From d41aed040f0d267bf8f9e2f513196c40e3b54b55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Archicratia Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:51:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] reset(archicrat-ia): resynchronise les sources DOCX/MDX canoniques --- ...lisation_Archicratie-version_officielle.docx | Bin 177534 -> 141160 bytes ...imes_de_co-viabilite-version_officielle.docx | Bin 389319 -> 130006 bytes ..._regimes_regulateurs-version_officielle.docx | Bin 252601 -> 108818 bytes ...utions_industrielles-version_officielle.docx | Bin 199687 -> 161413 bytes ...tions_archicratiques-version_officielle.docx | Bin 277321 -> 117877 bytes ...usion-Archicrat-IA-version_officielle.docx | Bin 35240 -> 18612 bytes ...itique_et_historique-version_officielle.docx | Bin 40431 -> 43182 bytes src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-1.mdx | 6458 ++++++++++++-- src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-2.mdx | 6313 ++++++++++++-- src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-3.mdx | 5005 +++++++++-- src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-4.mdx | 7686 ++++++++++++++--- src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-5.mdx | 6138 +++++++++++-- src/content/archicrat-ia/conclusion.mdx | 416 +- src/content/archicrat-ia/prologue.mdx | 1717 +++- 14 files changed, 29504 insertions(+), 4229 deletions(-) diff --git a/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_1—Fondements_epistemologiques_et_modelisation_Archicratie-version_officielle.docx b/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_1—Fondements_epistemologiques_et_modelisation_Archicratie-version_officielle.docx index f8462c3759b2fd5af3d230fb2525924bf456557c..0efa1b2607b2e20840a3dd802761f31fcde19f31 100644 GIT binary patch delta 140102 zcmZ^~b95$M@GcrB6TF$3*qS(RGO<0elZkEHd}G_TZQHhO+s>Wuch4X9o^?*I)lXHe z-p{V?si5Qe2KO)`t`+LV7TFg~Q9iL+E zuLQ7%KcrAXgjR!@g@OGw=O>R(Y+`Y>_x+Ze?MJL>bt|2f?LbUwoP;FUeZjVLZ~uqXm)mQ(z;#ZJ&uD2AJ{pQ-xNJ=lcFo}XX)iX9K}lx%!^Zy(goP< z7LrqQ{0c$&sW&o85D|Sg0_J>Vm<+4fuWk;%L?n7dBs%C7jS1NT;LT)BOi};b=L`LA z;C{>2@1!&jfkiSdfMhRyQi|-|u);Wxl|FrqIzHR|EWuewD%C`Tl{Xj?mbdaIf}6t1 z_iXWT6|=fZw3qMK<+|yU;FV6?VUpUtKYaz}b!~#00zKE0a}8y>2Owxz<@4HfWj;mO zH0Twr)_cPeZjPcd3?v(h%995IIA6tmo7vf-7+Z4kUX$ORME&@cSGtuNK~->Vxg-{C zjcHHF+sjc*5Eyy=@UQpZKVPB-Fk~fQ;f&^#<2As+z}6tZ!2W;X*8l?pi)#ZX0L@7E z5u$oNQKt?nONfXd1nMSY?fD7kIo?hDc57R#=L5s|a8C)Vo4R$FVo$QC)$n>?2aMpS zUqxu;*U`wJOph{kYyxMKUJrc>Ly+ZJ?S5mUpI|)Si>Kd+7}GRQ`^n_`J%-gI^k@<9 zE5hd8tHwM2RofHBB6i?3SZ!3c0a?xu!Eq3#ACdY_fwlS^_GTi^w*TsDuduI;>*_xzo0Bk|1m`4I>f9k ziHGa=*G3JV3ac?!h7;E?I#*bw8>{?mKUf&|4iE0eg67bkxo35QGgL~C?6R#;|Tfd%~Bw_CRncZw07o>R_#5J z{VS}-EM~#YvB3g8oLFnXr%K0lroZ%i3A*mEsSk{c0Ge9X*a+5lf>y!h=rJmg2qlAi z8D*a;>P7%ey&|>tZP+l>#4em+`A>rtGdZ5h=>n61rl;S^J7U3PJr+x~*(}L)K)P@ujgGa?z0*&GdT1>qlUXcqJtLc8uf7O;JG#WTh?MDkGoS3W7@?U1a(EgoG-*O;iA^yutl13f`5lDT^ZjB9nV@kQYIXP98jo45% zc0*3S_NVgS3pULf&W=D)(cNSyHZaVgm)uF`{h>o&x*PD(Xwi|()5qReZ-ndZ^e}|z zW{;0Y^=%w&`aOJ7lsPZM6c{pqBX@0Ta@Uq-M!1w8!XJ%&1z++*lEcF_)-RV2o1THZ zs21>xZ=f!h(O$s_J9pouPSTRJ}qx9 zJ)@0fKQ$4bqu-+^^6hpe(|KbBN88QRCRXY-ddY#1aIRVId&|HT&m}L?f&MqOu+BPq7AE3e6tdpwez0jXM5kUz3cvES~OPdgk z$C*F(&>5{w1s2@IT?EmDH6&Yt$PR&|)H_&BjH>6?A?$|uw-H+*u&p|Kdlf5jOKn5p z-aX3uGUHzI{ar`Ue&q&(WrjS&W#twl(v>_(bYGsH3~ez&2vgAI=2r$@Bsh<=F^{Et z$e^;WT?7%`VZLM2U&ld1HW6Zxg4J+Ec!8!t1GH|;t@<*4i@WqtQUd+cp*c1{`awl| zXT42P*AEpMUx;)~YGCBh$5z=gv>S9ha;5}W7Es$=3>=Va$8h%`@ZE7wIi~CC4z|4xyhdEXNa$<0XNXvAawLP%7gBqu8Eb0aR9b za#9T`C4=a4=MBCG77xyAk>XjkZu`ejIrR)I{ETHp$U5CAhef<&c6>v~;USW| zL~2k36LOT`-HI0z@`DP`oX(2GC&+oUr4D8m4@`OY9sLr1xOC7(O(Rdr$7zeY3%Qqh z7r#oAv&y8^EhfXWiYE+Vhjw^?kTQ=rQka=0WMzuCXWDxjvXB?FKWOIhM*Ir2v&jh0 zuMY_^8~#AmvwOp&Db|K-Jm{551}2TMsZ*S!ue$hN3RK8OT~f+|tPmQ3B$>eyZaQ4zN;W3Qyk@fCi#&d;tFIF((9kM`G6<7vtiVOU1Nv zuxGo~rZ*>?ZUup3T9dKIHN0&?#G+BJ8Ne;+n=#nCSa}WE;`(3n#ilJ@EusFIq)w9x zSes>nsLdw$r(lrlt%)|{G)8#?*y_=v36psXPHfOj^*8tF&F^S9xDQU?moqzw38x(T zJ!)YSy6;P7BKWSI$>y#4Ju3FC^_o7LAe3aAix+u@tLGKuK2xK}%G3pPx3|z0lhw%D z67P(0;-9IE%?6dww)cQb`KdL&_i*Lx8Ik@=$3BM!p(fDkq*&}*{)KS@%v5#%hY#k= z<}P}87WnD>Q0v?Jx9!YL6?Oum`%ME~xSWIm-6{-FS&{q^0hF3*YC!{pia|rYH z2V{#!7x)k|%v8!uT=pD*L+ulioSbajCx;sroaS+5M<)*;9o5lBAcy_-4%#V}cM>Ro zQ52a^*!~(PDDx4_KvoQ^0WQ0+=QxcCOIYWN-)dRxN8D8iBywr5#>Sx4X7T>a%i;wb zK5$;)BF7ynuCh{X)=qm0cO6{*k|L;#0cGT?6|nb<`%+`|%RJ8{Ugwat9V;Nq{3^|A zgl}@rGLoXL;%HeO) zRSCp5P`su@-*42ws}D4yr&XuyVHNURmjaaYz$N305~N@3q~w}SAnQfT-$r;0XdUME zu}_|pA`Gpn*g*7Sl^7{QyB`uhEJXq$-+uBh{n=xR*LZw4Y z)^Dq&3=cfH!-*%UnYuCl<{{O@rh^lBZK%)3f~d_z*co6Q^YZv{wS{2f6V$Pu(6Fc^ z685+cBKXf(i2=;d(csFZM(mrjAxH*$P-e{j6cp z?haV5e;Y^9=WksZnsJAV6`=F(&721v^)$1Uc&ePv5NzNNv6pg8{BFT1)l=9{v|1d1u(93=XB|$$W2O!IusIceDpva)K5d?LgI!ol)+fo3*of za5H6P`Z}t03{;twt=dbprx2P4@GZGL)K*8wFC=rAL|)+K6J-};rO2hp>=ATC5lY1) z=ba%h%HZTfL-t<@n#h%oKv8&+qaJL&0b@;k$9{< zfM`kib>%P{PoVvI9@lAZyVo7J6bvVo!T3rq(NZR3HqCxnas|d@(v-6@qcLHfcZIJ% zW2+5*vBTzir&~u>9hatj&LPtLPsvHp6M}J^;abbtsEyzppVl4F@U$&BjA?j2OYh>c zMa2>txg?&7L25ncNNSxaI7I>2hapY7+^)7q6(QI|8dX~sU1X0hWGh-WMlaC5KNuAK z#5JxkTH9v{E#)hD0A#&U!dG5Px$KgN+iPd?7_pq=^B8LqI#=2-!y>nRl-&fqH;-pN zPc5=<+^G#H%4jJ`3;nEm|H~zUJ$bbh9;TC093h9m-ejikTQL6TyAi>igY4UxSHWXb zdhGen2gPz)gdu8?c|e$C#D#Bu^8P0N;}b165<|mVkZp>{%$`Z3+?&g@K*dvv7q3t{ z46pxC&MiyO%>^j8+29ns?93E2!R0uA1WX#3D;c@mt52?gS(roDE}csAt{AIxOIHKZ zgoeGjC{EolInHj)2YpC+&Tq|sd=~OtTA#-K6BpK}bvy-^i`jR|&`3Fi6mamTrl+#9 z1PVdEugM&!^X1uce!iy(s)u3%jF#WLzMdT)sU(9QIKs(V#f!)Aj6o?hvGKaNbm=n4 zC$Z#)$LeI}kU8a^c#Mu|Xc4|#Bc%mvrXzEB6oMQvN-(5?OV9e4g;geeC% z@5Zi%DX%yIY5kA#&u#@@l%gB1D{cE<*TBuqTQUB%`5)8Dn|ZSZ?tgWv{J(X&R}l8k z*MBaZ9O?eae-HgXw(~zy>;H|!+Tm2Af5(VxFNFD`X0ubplF!k6N@|}zTOQdL}y4GK?|IKah zPzUn0P+(w&b^qJk*3?}MQ3{Um|5?h5bB7@Yt#?R7kuEvXvR!H0cFUoCSCyB$6;xIJ z;)B$Wj45sRhfIPf6=3L z^E+wBViUgm1si$TKwN?SFlV$%iYxvP&PS~&YtJpv>-9mQ=Ei*A^8JR)miy~|&{f4L zsPc44%K2gL$?K!6i|y_1Nont|(^>6B+iTI)#^Rnkf!8(fM^V+}k|(qEsg>Fcxx=38 z*WA-#4ktm`nVUkSaatkvYfV@BWT}_^rnVM~V#SxM%ohFoeaD&UYUbBA>}w(UN8{zO zb<#&QCHbpu^Q%w$f&ND&LHk!9!RHAwD6kbs-nx0yx)S+l%4+@knI>gk^>%96`B3Ji zVja|3IuwJhH#hoZHClKV<@(y!)U5l73mST~>~!Uh*AA!}r`y+m$@AQ8ECD==x-Bsw zJGPeF9tpl{Wlnb-lXMqMlXHFS?B;eh(>CqQRpLLIg4plx7I`f1l%AR>gSt{cP3`CE ztLPX~Ym!aP3l4HJp!e!BHJW$jAWyAjf0?iSHP7z1Pw=$U_qno4g3++VND|GFP-|p!H>fk&YR&Co;YDiY^S&c%fi&x~=<37!YjFa{Rc>yx{xO!| zb&E%H?P~LA>w~aecRdl!6Yv50$SoY=$GH298gcV*)Y6h>&bTPLIvYZKe(!jUTRsV*|xfOoUDD8zSva`DRNh^e7s&d zu7&@Gdl!rI$n=;?Q{LsBQ~N0OV#l*d(Pk=3q}3_Mu1&m;vXp6)rY!}L$B8!Hnw7Gy z*)q>~b+))mRb>V#t|$t+D&9Hn9X(z?pmkWzOt8jcSt z+gpmf77tk{+{CX_b&7M9&!U?hT6=g75BE7qje^zMJcCV*2dAJwC$XV1H^-;eHh1oL z%ZRNePromxMnuq%j395>)-5%;7t=&4Pi>3EG0J2Oo1h?aYd7zi>)I%<_PFvpvfIEmFdpQk4mpaZH?)LIRVA@^JnEQnl7`G%~Pue;80Dz#8zV8Y0?K* zq$7LPtLsDEZ7zrmk`;Z~@LrjtRvE|Zy1^Q|#V4i-rwW{#KDj3%9;vS=h@8DS0v9zG)?r18UF)+ZYwJT^0!M5 zyLOb9Fdr7Lh>rD#yo-h(K|a!YQ$vtvL!cB=Zxzc^(_K(SU)hlJbol$<(i|*v549q4 z|I9hFT|-goA>=y?`zIM3H&TGC7^~DI#AgtOk2K_ke`{XXLQ;~WP+6b)7Oze^oiKyR zz0<1f+{y-T%mTHN9a6j8v%58RE5qwWw~S9Yt`}z7#QJE}$>3^j>{jCb!ijdf=i-DY znQrMo;WY?r)?UynYf8a!qelttv8klWZPT>fbdd5rqO;RXSS2flH!PDU1MsnjHZHB) z3z2w%ww8K^w3(4%%b`>SvuU1&w7~+T#52%RWq(<78obd76WLl!6qJgR&y48e6mJK_)3%;GB1!oPe}hl<%^w&#pdkc#Dy^wY{eAJuwda z6E2Uj5Ig&EB@icslN2%`cxQlD;pAmqr?w6!En^em+-sxi8~_z%)^V_Rgu3}q!^ID5)glpJKlH;EPJkvw>>g6F; zLLk<28Ko(6o^obMAkes?Nv^ISYuszja@I|;y^vaEHPGYZcN}!(^TkQW1=q$$*$c9p z?7qRWcQ4uP)UI714!gzS!*LR67R<{P?(~$_3qOn{wK5gafkH?Sv!u5R6TQ zNIfvCv3|#>Hb~LWy|tt*5Ln@|ijC~30P4(6%k!MVaWAf7>uWe&);_Ty|L=L!UKbQK;iwj1jtSXsX}8J_H1=hNk%zdQk78&mG^p&^RuP9)y|1) zM@Pq%!>Pi;^BKHyrOY9L#zb2RRZ@=cFi=Fg)4wQ~T!N*P5vRuO=}&>CpiH9%vPxXq z;6w)0Eb|q?A7PbGVjlR~KaX6>xLmV4d35;3qb-AWei45G2H-nJB3z2}Qy|VXTQV8- zJUs@Tq8Zp5=olHZ0q@(VQqXRd;oeMmEk7mdwz^o;qVvh-u(BxT6zv~GlA~P4_J9q| z0dtF_(i_6XAQ_6G3d-eeiL_My-bF`ySFtdnnRX8;W>dnnHo)WJ0ckrh%QYF^%S`2` z+kJ3|6M$2bBA3boS8_6L0i;b5ZlF!ZZ{U&}paNOL0#q{0W^`DzGs@==UxU=x>khNn z8Y%K&*-YhK_c-j1^0&MrJTftI=NHMyWU9;(VC3fenKscX#zsc)`apAJV~{rfZN7}( z0unFTC?X)|O5i$Z$^W>tn{JsDxo*Fr!2|HK*l9O+;092<-2J`35#+L|*pZ>63=E(U zwOMSfW33|#(x01sm7^MHqbx|BlGjmNSPs&j^vr9U-l73y#07b3@vfYP$N$C$&%QV|d3wuB5cow563Hb%A+*VqP#I=&pMXm0$8ss-1l zI2ssw)+`{E1LCWSqZkL^N!w#-{GpQ%eDexotP#s<%TGpJDPWzL2bJ0t`!MZ#rV<8$wZzu*j&Ka z$wB6iRegTf-7KEdl>AS&_ekZa^)9u`L5z=PwtcticjT^IOk1Rb4PJaN{uz4S{ZOuX zQBF43?N|Ct5CPWeH>Eh-Y5zIff&fn7Y{tgN$4Y9HPbZj!*II&Tli^u7oW~BKDJ!WA z=RA3nfa{O3yR9Ejl_6Kdrc87`(7%dZB#Zy3pyl?_$?k5KUIlQSO1z{414hI206<@1 z1B2|7Dx8=138&HlY&H1k1?qL(+L^iP^yug*P^t#E>PLG?C1vzSm{+BEE5=GK1wsOz>Rjm6=_T6uo8ep!`y9dd1m2I4tPffF zh!`GTw27AnwUpjF^f-Z;Yl2Tzcz+dW@s=Ow4TcRA4?8(?ut=WzE3`wA29+)G%ww!J z%e>JMoj0kPX^&A|-#|frl2Hj&#aebCrVqs1RY z9vM3~9va0c>7%$A{e6D}vvxIIq1>6ejct)_ZuutBNBs)2i%b8Etfp{C;$D5yFX&KU zjE48fvrn7HhVj6HgJg{m(77o4SXlo2TPz^f51|G#$AB(JkwU9CviyMSNh6M6W#6m$ zRg#zOZ}rfKx_B*idd4JnrLAk~RqYLkSK+(IlZ?i2`QFe>(A=qn8`C^mtB{F!KZCt1 z{cWk~b9y?#X>0Y@X(gMtl@b9youHc)&@bg`uQBK*ug@l=UXex+$m*|>5?7poN+bkt zW2SVJQ0Kd_t`MfR#CZbhLB6ULabT0=JljjTp&HAIL5>OItMnojHdjs7%UT7=!Y3FX zXvK*$SMe$-hQi6Djd2H8_++dJN>IY9E!PYe@j+^ zYrh$jz&D*=p|H>u9ozM2BYU5;aD1HMpm^Vr?iWm#Q`M%K01Sn4t(^Gs8u@`hpiBQt z7u>-(oO1-&LY4l|PEDxIh`b46;D;Hkks!(lncx0Fo}k7W#v%yJ7``btlVzQ8jGNY( zkBy_vAFA{yqqw(W8(7-ru880Qx=jc3MrkAs^$7i_HJBTL*&>;Uj=tI3_bh**#sTFV*K^0{#pe3NVZF#T;+AhW zj*n)Ok{rI2o4;c=RZ4>%k=A(8ylljOfL{lx9v5MR{st>(S44j>N-Rd2q%p5DMyI^T zHGRRR7rv>`L%0jX zfO%{tc;M6Q{MP$dh25!AokkAq=S|KU$hQSjN@QDUU5`7PdrItkmr1G5Rh?fr{@C>N z(XLKrtxEn79)cZc7CS~Ocz?bK2skMScCBBx$gHRNMJ{s}XP{Z+WzGpF9X!5)jQI> zOciA1;^$HYl@#HuXtB0@{ayP_F>I;|`v}qgm`%~pvb_n4tbbKnupDv)JQ?8$i=0d~ z+WwJ(&FZ^^C54oN#1WD=5t_JGGMn_3N+JlvDgd}+x$>wbjGNfJj6-%0mYE3zQv zkrqMNge3uu9$4SUe`N9Lbf6XzBGgQLBgLk=e6I+Y_t5v0B++>ZQ^J6vw`prRR%hQ{ z_ddFk!Q5E20JOk)H5UbiPM!l-@baSLF5uQi({2O0i<1JW1ilac)!n$4B7blt6myiI z84FtnDyZzR;$v99yui}V{oxeFb_hj4K>!D_4w~GlMeF|X7Y8rI^RI5anBgv4{lD`jWQKRLM0fDz?Xh@L(LPOkY$tJ z&K9LZ?N(s;NGntb1736R4cT0>kxt#*WUN!F4el66uFLtQ^lC}tid^7eW|bs z*ZkRdIhks;A&bv@2N_+92wGmp{FRPO-mBL54dTzw?iy#{3S=$LPA5(qfkhs$nr=c# znEJW@3dV77mN zd)i1|M88VvxgHm;vYL~9cm0!(*AF))SNf!gU;h`g5{2dnV@JRPJq{5))?V=pZX7;Z zDJjKg_S%U=-yX4MfWQw>447~WEPWHoXX!CV8J7x*m`8R07{!z_T7YYqnK8w64P^%9 zTB*e|k-ynxuR@6G&sGzG3e7wailyoSdJaYAwbPh{{$uFoaM%P3&Ju~Y&Kf1m_eoY9 zFKTl#6ZH&D`EtEHXgr$tV{^~(a+r(ibqxbYJ}Z+xq`O5#N`Q0-(;RJAQ- zd8(fZJI=py{6}rE+veF5J%cU^F~c|wG=518MK>aFV;ZguBTn|^xh3g3ZtsvuD{d`~ z!!w`l%>rzX3H+@0)PXYYp(gCiuI^*7hiyfl4WFf1{@b)tv{_B~xZ~ z&;HgL{PK3f3)wpa>@)e#K|F~2#=g%&Y5?~IN#*qr2))s*hxSqH<>bkotiiUEPP`Sl zlEU+2?Tb4-_1|(UNR(negEZdCf{s!{Le|TVrE)hrnDlYhIx0AZ)sMC|oU~n%he9J- z1eZO(m->r6UckvW@x$ZZaGrA1?OmQ6Cn?XIr7&+H9u-J?I4>KsE6PQt5U_^J7Xxia zIv^Sb!YPP4@gy>}dM!Wmf=UBdSf{y_L>@)L@FRBa)D@=eQ9vz=j>Zn0>d8bV&lXyU z#fi&PDt9h?|LMflcGxR&wNE!#{k?TQS#(MskJ|>pTkFT5pl;IGIxWVJOvNkAeO%8Y zpVX(6%d`jqSB0dr2UpgJ;WI*!@Jv74HI^C`aIyN=fmH_y9`YGdA40QIvxQ)4{rPD41!rTLUd zKkplO-3h|^v@jTlwGSRK=T9!$NOI+yW)gEkk4U+poo8;;NLIY+4;2l2Y zr=_=Nf@aoZGgRO13+85ozUrj@G9^TS=o|D%=3)_A!oZ?f(7LR^tsC!nE1G>p1KV|d zV7KF@i^U4|*b1yPn~z7RKkX`e@Ty=uh=14p9c2;hC2%!zBDUNnOu9->?ShQ7aF(X*O48nF@1K)vimf&$&rxv1}UG z7y)hqErT^S27a|#Kv8y6+O|dwx`~2Z&aB_iZ$iTWn){3LEE1|M1;uYJJYdg5NrbRo zOSQ|F7lHy16U%82AJBex`*CIMTrQyHrnzos`_%2N-=mLNJuv`QrZ8(UImh7ts@Cbz z@g$awxR(yF_ekFx{En+BcHvbM;qn@|P|G6vyA4oA&7|9Y<`6({En0^G!HZI4^T;KCjhx1f@S4ygeIY4f$o%O6ovHC_LJ+`Z?iv2S$fP>*!AXwazQCF`kJN>`9Z_p*(Es}fr zP;+X0%oi?qPuNjO`VakkDU*jn&E2IpBOwOsJgdQSWy_g{`=^O%LgkNYWojJN+GJ-I z$VoDos%bZYh+qo67w|Hib^}T!*>d6Brd?$hq|7pq!tS14J24gLo$@-Y#HYuGX-XIY zxOW3#ug1E@Wo2gN|Lv()1yIT{mDYD(C9OLX)PpLuUT%8IOu{h0p$E%Rl_}ZzO#tED zQgJVvvH4Z@c#l=>9^y`*N_reW+}#Dm$%9=g=Rjm1VBR;0c#6jo8h&unC0x1{)}tr< zaoekP#Vx^MJDLv?Rmrp8&{y@!kYn30foUi*Y>}_UXX;s=ppED7PXLDPd@aMb&kM$ti3t6MC~MjD^% z&$<*WcV2%ENA7GsT9nzm{fbqj;c&Co26C)SaTFlJi_A@HkB$vQvV&Jten+eD9|-g_}OiaT&vkJ0MzgrJ38;@+jIw!WG$RsE&u{j<&msJ4u`IR+v_B~ zaiTIeLSP&u$A4i^%40bV+Kc3i$gh{Ke1)*h0d-pm{8Y+YcEKl*-s5^w?0Hi6=Pcn0 z!9AiSnk<2RUK!e)5dcDr-eLRf+X&tx;YJ4QHLM8khCcT21)*uP4`k zC(}T@F>uvp#{6o`8wawlu+>io&jK+BQM8wzK25NzZOiBf?+oS>ytGckn2`AUF+GIG z7Z?Y{s^)Yw!~>&0Xdmfo>|WqJz4%Shl(>7QH#yKa?>%+OwM@AtNYh1XKBD9>$*yZg z%KDin2%=#+yseDlC-S1V^{1I+@030igK$8exP?Q7^BBW8+`$j=M*z)I56*#Kt}Bqv zzhwY$GE%P4)XfinbYt)kICeiH}1Fn#u{&SJ#AgOb9pmCviNtX@h=!v zXVBQS(MC;dMh7SXWA`c5K*&CQIQzbUZSnS$^QXV*U%D&IA2xNoC z9!sOe9d9ZjN}PY+Q3Ry4EfsTwr@i9aCkk;3$YcXMAS*XhV=e@HFYfSYXk|B$AY1%Ecbi=}pz|?vAzZ zK6NcR2kIjMm}n}YU=n1`6t@C=0?t8G;7iK+DNdipC5C#;ztvk(14y_q(lMNq^hzkapcBtV$g zsAbZ9{|gjj`&*H1=V$o~&D-Ka-brN@H|4dj+=y>|TsIEC$(Tg=Efuk?wTTrpPupxo z#N_&e=zDWD$wc*Zn^-8aIvdO-{JaWPp>*A2%l?71gKL8a>UrAJ$jAd; zsa2^#vfstQxExUq`iNviA~AMwNZk`1uB$fYicg42f!}#DOca_J%+wGu zaIZ8xh}nR&(wY1ZP*UjlQG0e#MDMeJLpJ+96lAXhNklW!RoUex_vcg4yWX=;CV!@r zWJ8g&@mrEq-+P#H_9{;lav(0$3eIOS8{mCBI$gE{e=!pePU@TA25EM9O2TKzPU$|*m8o!LtQGonH7dngr3oD)5BKYm!2~ z7iUn4*>91%r1oRW7WQ@B&L1SrCR%>|F-5@S3c{B8J^9XsjF=M%JeI~{tlyvw{Xx8X z)0q_AgWKeAU=YVhCBM$_0_tA^|L~*}T2{jx(8CVzNo2zT2s(uWZDFTi$E{LFMnSZ= z`H$OAZ#uy_1Ua_?2DR;j9Ut1X722ldjq0j)97@>IyYO65v{PWDTjpPr=Mr7tOHITq z)<+a*v?c?c?$*w6uIiT9d}x7Oi!>GGrQQfnA5nA#YG+lrfr(r7X+@_U9eTP=ifLj~ z^x6=@IGUe=AZ>=yPrmq`s7-GMm#-)v2HEtUA@Rqc$0)zw)gim3>G(X}vwxaeOO8yR z?&$)n-12tqokDN*`uDll7ZUMAs3CC-l)yI+QQh4)V8L{Eq+AGA=O{#AiY$FFf6w=s zFqk0pb5>soV0D817&cpK4RSbBc?=4n0H3+}{*yBa4%8v^H)wkJSh(*y{w%^ILZNzR zJER$I)esUdk# zNTw39;u+zn(R1{2qf+*Uzo(|}Jq5)p`l%u~_+gLYeolwNYE1vaOY~R1sofH+6mf5d z)sWwOlOb)IHg#RT1Srz3lA^xh9pixBVYZ(0oI$%dT^wEALmKA?0ieFs!6t71yxUEL z=B{0W*(KtJQUsuaDb)m$Hwn7bR=WyF5`GHNA(6!KvTAkrzPehU*xY+myWkjHrwnPA z+H`o@76*&O%0}Q@poJfDi3=4hHOYYXwq@@+wYIo-t3fp$^_3A?u{SOvUuvx$tm%Rx z8VEvS8lJRJbemCJb=q!dKg-m-T;>tiSjKmP=ISq1#kKagcGH2V)mZ20G_sXlJ*LO0Y}<1nHnaMu5&wP97Z^X_8NM ztTn^OcB+TDS|Z)U&llr#C>ICZOlKXps}?cpQ!uz>e7_N?il#C@x5E_tqurmv;_|>b z{NrUf!&I1IxG6?%s;0i>>aSMk{I|53V<*?l&sZRuhac0O4-^*_eQ4hE!Eb$|5FTct zH~BAB%3RW%sh4<{+Y(3{3TygcZji2X6Zsw3Gj&h7BKpq6-qHGixR3-aeR(Ej3|$gf zC>}heLSE7=Yrm&)#w5nACXVoln=&t;ZnQ)PTc>U)pYAs?0-;<@gnTRJvAzt(w{kY{ z1XbjPpM88l6E99vTyR=)SvcXfP~h&ZugbqayZG^K4qza>jMS$h@J2T{96=#76)4)K zg!%E_F+p~OhD8`r8fdKiJgwl4r>0fOm5Cy#{E{Nbcw{I&D~uRZ-Q^9_8>F)>Yz)q~ zhT3DvM8B5=bOr+mk`Yssz&VcU z18M7$;ipmHdEUy=$5?zwYEpb6AiC6)dzS-rO&BU@rFdna%DKexa`D{Q>+(bd3_zL# z6Ny|UO*+eMbD-&mMBvb93P9ZbCKd2a1TNz{gw%&~p?gG+K#o&10f;XjH*Z2tEiH+8 z5dS+7*RP}UN=jKxCaF$CY!8!K_ovo%jq$O_3As)U-+Ou~_4Hlr?>3`c?@~xzZ_!kT zIZ5>J$j8TiTuJ0A2;=kz2B8cipV{U)3MYJFf|aADbC&BhrU45i)=+h13UbJB)pq1`5G=k% zXzT8<1tR1@X7%#Dvblw02>A5~K3BolmF-`E%JI#;PN-=@=Y(P+3DmTd#&#cI4^+4g6j`cyp-4(2fsem^?cu)x~1jo!s8H&k9WEKT=#VN3YQri1r0$1a;*R1xr}wX#teN-gv6{=atxvfu}? z&NQz{iY5kT_x-;}{qhC$gvKs#*I5z02td%jiTb4v=y3>IHiFV~UYIWMn~w?Y%1X6e z(dEXGt@2Pzr+?TDgKg?2j|`)y78ormS+^jqslOZjNc|i)b^ZRiU#}nu7UL!bcY1ww zD!NK;yGt||9Xu&JfZSwFZ<`UZ(;o_TYA(wf!%i*|h)r}6gM~8T^n8@l9@~0Y0vRRa zz(KbGQV%piE!+{_{(OoWpo!>+#yagzVy0`->vEl&tq7L6<)Gn?jyg2`O|K0c5Vn~j z@)>JN#aWY(Bt{upx7bjeL#3wDXWrA=Rr=ek+Ggb-#o6a}GL*8ayYX_**ECkp%JMw~ zLEM>|ce-Lqf%@lsYG>~NztNXc5hTijd@ddW=t+?&x!Vhm3Zy#V7HV7pgN2CmRHqn%yc~x-96-}ff1s@c> z?Q8N_9rF0&PL(NFG=uX*_G$7*?d;G015H4(zoTz|To*#&cF&~d(gRW+G+|Dj&YBQ- zN!2uCIWeO)d9dRX-Z5=R^XYHmrxv|W0mv^AWubseK_(>1Ojupvk$pRZZ9A%|v!J4i zl$NV7l!W0+9#T-c=iUZ&8zsw)sP0|#DW{xPo3#Ipa~kz-90}KKl(645IfU1|V#Zb;egWGe z#+^Wtq6VW>ZSoyt)YdP7&zU0Nhmn70o1;@2wd38MfE&#^#~>w1 zt{3Gmog7|HcQSN_sdMKc2@mM$--|t5^l;4p)ePjtkg)~jCLp0v54Vhl5yPZ+=bBL{l-ZxJ5yskJe=Al?H1Cg?Kf6`JE^ySk!mW%V~~O&_v_9tDyX zOKna67C?-Q8mHdi2|q5J&caCN4{aH-!@7I*PH#YLPNn%oLSsQWKv2++K}U5uW11;3 zwUO*B^N^8@=zN#^>}wb04pqm5F42a6xQT}8PdsE_?2vHhN_LT+x5Kb$WZJS6YzpZrs&BqqJ6e~r#Qp$FxJUtnIZil-J z4A~Fd|52$su}A3K%9HLv3w65IAzs6{)iIr(gWy1Yb^(Qk`of2h3q4rE=SD+lj?ZUc*t4hzx0 z#Z=m372QkRNC$rBJD?>ng6+Vb9yzEwmPt-ppP&en1Jl#4eo9gvzucCRqDz;GnIfk%jnw0*-6c~P8#zqiNV_SG4TJe#?p|+u zjNmWCpM}w4p_K$WFDn{WN@fM|}U@L7zkaivSXtFP^Y^`O1KvTpJ{SgRk zbOJF`V=&-7*L1I{n^9?Gf^Z$^q>~t~ooLQLxKWy*Ghwb+xi^ssG~DJTgLgB~VtDL$ zQ8M~vj~*lU!Ht0PlsTm`3LS6(nf~-c9Nr-Zot~#FDIfdGIS(&?2T_E2E90gB1!yq` z{=rzpT8fO|ckc4+Wt&+%Un;g7S++8%bo{YB!hO%{l!wLpA5uZ(!i54L1duoL9N*L% zaN^w2i}hqsJfUbi*&U!i+#Dtdqc`(_Z_go!Iw#ClT`&)~b!Q+N6BF8s@s8b|^Hok& z&tkd5C>19F8TpuhB?apE2lEEPh;NkoIh{YKphVLn7O)OoG=1#vY|$Kq1{qPhQ=QbJ z?|}*d?%|w#AY<|-#~9U3t9+lMl<^I}i5aROr5G~@^1nB-NP*8^H*ykrWhoKIUM4mm zz?>4!2XAx{rss53ZFA$nX9D^x(184T@bTxSGws6S!c@n9(tJW7#CxbT75Z9nP^z;G zgpD~Xg(k`aZ?OW9R_@JfJG(vrkJoqqx@{&#wQeJfF%Agp(PUi_g)=mrJr2AJ93om+ zkVmrSdsqBOs=)BxN4TRqTf#gk;bkAVMx2Ew7L^xrJw?1*ZcM5xWp!Oo%2z5AQ1}FU z&ZkbIelF#I;Innz;sT8z*bM5)jlU0sMPjxDLiVyS&}p&Z9gRxi2pXd=G^pJOs>Z~q ziG#}hr&1eJqR`6wo)yW3JdR6tHB{?N8cZlsS(~WJO4Pe)eIj^zly+yDqvU!j zQK>0*C$NKtl)bP8g1fC%@;SKku*X- zSM*YN9NkW&h&$zK$B#^HTX_I7ZCf9PLY4@0YliI~r4=k2>+xb@5oCA)Vud!)RoMw= zu-9^btXvbxG+3$T)CSV^pXIy|k*2$?>eAWSXB26?*$vmtbaL6hq z0ih#*b1I=8`HK~C9m1X?UqBbjJ7#u|d<~4*?T6`|wqFjoj1Yyd1N1|vV&=D+%K9LL z?83e;vjnQr8OTy|>Hw9Zh!ttrRLk*9&WApKl6gbNQ9dG%&Bs{St6c+I+*@Tx>8;2% z=^r_OZR?jZ5|q*7yNb3v6D!MocLbbL@r$fgx8{l27q#>eJBX|%e4%rCN}WUW9Ea2P z#+~!YSf&Gm*^ahD-5G;Z*=5adlgCAYlY*DN(~X4b3WqxhAR2|EO8DD{)gwitryOa2 z8GL18XUzQ0;g(X>XNud8!lVdi6k0D*D)mvO66B2=Q8Qy+ayj*hO6)Wx9izw6LNk`~ z@T++jti&MoqbM64lq3tlsJG|kaN;Cn)?7f){A|NYGY!{s({fY?%zF@0;%D8+4#px^ zl1bS_oQ=KgW$z72ODWXk;TOZ@hz6a1R4Pr{RXQau%ibIM$cW@@Ok$9!*CW<2|B5H| zjC8p7If;0hq~U^5C$-U|vh+TE^5a5z?)jWk-rq|RL??KBZj-&&L2me+?2yGkmX21b zNzk7{PHpo_8LP8%HHvYtkzEWQ8Jo5`%b}j?4tIU``UMD4D-nm>)y_5{mGWSJs-<^x zik|7Uo$eU>3{yb7(q;LGQu^iYgcOoLA%H*X09fXZ7=4)JSA=(1&815+N6j`h1)1=J z%y2K@i8cY+a(z}5a{?GMiHwNiT$Hen&BUaZqqM4(aQtwdj~yzT0pC~%E+^ZRjg{d2&(LMUa&O7urn@GcPocYCtl7)()BJ?GnwTjng+`XyO^#6~H01$2>PE}Bko>zxWKXTwW-4D=Q?VX~a1l#8G3AvF;e z7zLY%X9!~B=sL=@iB7W%{6Qy^ubW9R&Y*8Su8X~2CmG`%?cAJ6&<}5;!~qM9qXQzE z|Nj5}_CNmXfBdii{r~&d2Lv>al1iKM3x@%DV7m^uvVZ@7{^P%Y{`>#^AOFk0|6l*{ zw-32C@ongaX`aHq{_bBmp9Yb`&S1rkvh)3dEDu$CcFYkk5=4?8sQhd-ePJn24G^%oQ@edPt6FD1zc}9W=S5 zfIiV?X4^4|s&-U=sX3Q{ZJsAXcr@0Vi?&o#&y5=4Nk9y8z=8{Bls1gR^tP$aJ!I+4 zl;avPGbhrLh4kkDTq{z%CP+t-#6DfQBZl>ot_!bcFLlVS0b-Og7L_TL=kO1kOhb{A zmoV&;Wci$R0Myd3sta+M#k|ta@vFO4k_o~rF&|w(11Eof0Xt2tK)BsGVs`YiY~Dox z1x$Vdw(3!28leO|p4gkZ@;-fRzfx?KKibOxOW0_B$4k2E& z?YG(^D!4|!xzKvOZ*Lt5mqVqzN(%svvvl)8nKxiM5uPXQpwf05$}>BCKKI31ewvE}N5 z<$!PMRFsV^qE_L{+*$Av$A};%R~oe`32o?gmK-fSZL-;{PusDaXE`i~wmX@yer24E z@=fJ`srYT)nr?DkJEzM@tt|8ElqwQ=z*VF?Es;UqyfyGxknIM($JmF=13_VZ^;~q% zjUDH(MS3_abvjO0<%8nHTVXVswWfYEa=2bVwf6F$=81`$84OZ$0k4s&iDt~BLesM1 zf!c_Y8$)7jA1Pi`WYL=oVOF>t1^g`iJ>ElTI!b?N7M4!rUhz?d2P+|1$O1cG4p`u+pA2bui771*0~!&3 zEZw?NR0u)mXC=eXl>TAUCv1||-(%*=fW~^9U8+uqJn1_Xp2zoeWQnc991K{fMGsTq z;k*5(Q=erY_gb*F3OElt94ui5??eb?TN`ZK3Kj#TWOySyGX&raR&1psIp$IGV<%i( zJqkfM!gv0?;S_HLZ@7d`N~}I=fkSeCQ#v4E;@tF*C|)zw5db}WYTs?}Yaz&wA zj8Rc+VA^@pZ4o3r(}l%D}gn6ny6`+&#A5_&n*Hv-4lQVL_| zzsCtu(Cnmezff0I6ep7eHk{^Rh3VGj4Wp|oq)VBV>)Tu4F!_TXLyK6XW{1sxLzEQX z#ik7q$H;-1P*QBHEI{?*k!tm(nF^U`Nqjs`B@eh(-z-u>)i-kF@1_@z5)@gCghZ_D zn#YE(G?}*fbHaJ|!fP@{!^2M4XoLzR$ezr7=sVR2^G#86#4XoN-1OKpx=_SYyj~ z1DE^;&D#T85*W?c4s3aY)dFZdC6=RIUikIxwjP+3=DNYfle--Sjfhl#k;CJ8ILm2T z-^4Zw&2n;ee7`&}4O_{R)iRzUeji(khlMj>UStchSCFf^>UtTcl2-(!^&^@orSq=x z3@}JSOp8wDo{G;N@@|EvaDgX`#?+`EjA_PP2ZwmhC7X z<$T*g&qRi$MDa?~q15t!d#Q?b7HS#Aujppl`~)Xj<8&sc!&x#=t7K@T%(2z(r_f(d zK4uaIIqfZexcbCCDi?NSX({oBPH9!L%%=*UYEo{0(;N5@X@${zYeK=OyMOzgj0@je z{4mu71*u`M=e4qkaUT zC#%n8a!;N^R*AK3d2e66OQ0W4xvZXW*;1O72C|;TVnc#jc^iGjxGc8+sT!%B^`TC^ zb(0%RD2j|b?TZae2hCrSK$VsBRvg+ z^rJp4KY;WWo#6#*p@hSEQtuhSv=Z_3@V7Lw%vpNGV`XB&^q>)gMLNj>q|86o|5F8n(K>wS734O2vuFp{llhN}zd9 z3ENeDYU8L_wveR5mbIz@0zm652V-bb1A7ovk9l^ssd8K*f3oc)Cl*AtA%sS4&yvaeLb zAMl5`o+8iM-jOi|13@G~Snq=jm;molM-%)ZMj^Si_VIJVR5x9^Ke+b^;({@w{u|x60IDk~v z=|t(?U(Z%=STZEygIpywxdA_O>lpk|%o!fAi(_*YL|!hRCm_Me&@Er@5pof}0#=9_ zGKmbL=!$ZZ_OPaH zQ_G{k^m*cq3D!IgqubcGn@e!iD7izX6e?}igocz(wHjMScq{C3VdVL=;t`*J?pPQ& zJPGNd0g;J~Ehf|woG`ehQ2)tlK8d>YJ23k(2Fw@xU)nqJ(9v5%XX@o7-I?1}nG3>y+div$8(e4e>G|T#v z!oi}-Zt!Fgx=|ZPCP+Y%)7>jx&gRAj8o3>E&88A~{;?iR^-8!MsU+kI(?ZYE!w%rs-`i4A=1IPmd{-`5Aaxv;7-r3&CoB(Uv2SI9wqg z;iD;eR^ebq`Mg5%yuI!{t)|_?6Ui0;Po+idlI#l4Q3C*TVJ+g?(LVx;8*FiPkyWrK0U6|XajZ7I%a_Nm>CJwjYjFByk;F9 zTfVG^s_Uc!F=9*$1z^AK%0b@d%;&;;PZsES+x2tr`|j%{7Q%gh9cXMgjMUl-4-KfT zXILkyJuTUQ!Rj0$5`MzO10HTH1F&|sc^3lK7@> zkdJZ})&y?47fRXAi%r(jx_UF>NAljoI@B#zA3k7JKK3SuJT?a3kbBZ{+(H@ohN(}r zRer!ywN?T}pB<8akbrh77>79`)Oy&A;fEBkj$E8O!|T^|)IZh&4u@{@fDSyr0a}&x zS{FNz?lZ3~1}f>FAMy_vBiHM|DCmqX9pefIn}_6rYR!f?sU*Yl=%x@5 zR@OnsV_9n=X>~s9L#E2g)7vbFzbH+xzM{fXS*Dx zpcSgp&xmlko|nGfG=lEY_W0;4Z>60ifA)PScJ5yjtAL&mrFb3%78jDGMXK8b^80$a zM``hRj_9u`@5n!lOI2AsVX0ee{AGu+u|1Bkvv`gG!0Q{Rsb?OeIq+ z#AQmO)8#6j>qF$S&*%l5J}r$70#Kl}Q(zkB+BlRy9A;|yZ2r8g}d`oO58o|*Gs5+@cK zYamfvrkF{q#l~G%I_Y}DSdOl)^(4RKD&pYj-G(Cr=~;EP6AEi#PKxY?q)6>g zv^o;;ec`pt>=zg1`pW*D$m$E#hM=tIl4EPb4xtw-$~^j(Gz=-fSgP*o*VePDKX4nT zrE5~)(RSOq1RrWA`#xu!$>Sw4o66LGA`aLMU-iS^T(#9AU$`;St~ohxA;BoEkM|N0WxbNW4A54Qv+W^Vr+u_>{C|FHhL zGc_aH-Cfx-=DC)QzWU`~eEP9cb^0{QSL(CRfBwa%p00F= zS+#E=0cX`V(sy=jN~X8tg>0Eb+6ljRX!iKxd~#zIiN$koFqK1dDN&$*0*QOfY$Ui{ z(@Fzw?E=QHCdIReN)bxKfRS@OkG@wTaH&?GHrMQujFNSauS+g4QP}Y^()5UO7-HrN zdff%HL!R2ke0IWxvnU#@rLON1#q4zazpMlW5R!;QoQhzC=@(pg?SLDSeDox$;7!G- z>{EQTFfnkY0f)rp%dfqD3(JitIgJ!d;(c9`1HtSgwf~1T7F2-UylrR8I^s2sOxSB5U?k`uVmG2Hw(I6T-08J{AV6Q9A! z1rIG*Zd5Vh4Rd?IW1~9AI0}i#eDve|}LqC)`(m`(X$Yh6D8Y3lR`%9hzVN zI)<4--{{vpQeKSJkZNhyPoA-}y;wuxAaQOV=u77|F5g=wsRAriZB1{%fDoV?rN$_v z(5E&FpQY^7n*2fM;k31#8unG{cc2~@g2guz)-9kgnQ*a*Jg+m6=STSmpeBBT<6A5h#GYh{5O-Q;rm1#eIB+gr3gY(PbopU9p^U6 zXKvV5OG2gOd4}r|!;~v7gQe|cPf_ibsTwOald9bT_9oBIbUR>jIh1Z~Z4eWPY+@7? z)+IAy02LKpJ+kMdB!Pw1X<~r%*jivJ5+^k6UZm!KggDZ3G=uZ#w1Fay-GnGgbr`Ok zUkb`jYfxVUI%ep{)$?Ai8$7hHNRn19Ag!ylws6DJBcX6pqNdJE3BxGNWGXj^ejfa?uSJwxSXuC%cT1HZ>gf_4;E}{pFn`x zBYdTQ!h=Gj@SLN5jY|UpUtE-$`yv$^Wd<5RVSWL#8V!gJm3mNA$-6Nj_$ zASII=!^ezL9h(P(b^e-b4lPJ(FkdUyO)bR@^XN#Tql1K3wMt&I5YWw#*e3Iq%4)0f ziB;2mxuSz86`*Wla}4CPqsZKNk^X>v7<*oSs<9dx##uM`?b5$fM+QeC$rVSy)HKq} z?lRXdP+=n*VV58fee7*|;yks)Rm_1RRPq64AJPY-a9Jh?p;{=(3vE`MH{olQR zrjw2c*t6&ho@!ai=9YG55wC$gTg&wU<2;NdCxoF)b9V)$vCL_i;2y{E7R}%oH(nmF z`Ec*A=^{x%RCLxwnenQ_Pt2RpO=x+sp|gQAz6?gbN@}pgNR+9TaC}CxSoXLNnI0<> zvcFNE3RVIU>?Bs_54x9sy%@G1?!mDA=s^R!ALVqH!bFpSs9Wvbe~5gB zBfIW`PV;|`|evnje-aVN_I#fomBLa!1F`x9m{Ja z==^@%|1UCnwR6F>L(DU&>d@_>e>hgN4%FjM-7GW|0rrej{=K;GUqz15_}C?XLQ0RF zqOaPti%eJtb<~s(=;9p@u76Kuua4Y#9Rw{|)ge(+#7c~6f}@qgdGH{tidN<_W`#<{ z^fsHBRUMfMW^7K2gVf|DPtO<}Kgn6PA2XFJ#dVj$tynU{oRkmvBcdGT8@ql&Oy=rv zS?`c*dOLeU=O@u9JoWbYdMRap@g2&zoU&4VZb=xU0LPT!3#X<%)NB1ZF$9b z1s>Z5P|nyNzvbckezK;#3&y4M)k3yPxNMe6S^{&Cxo~HD*x_qEUKsyHb8_-TVUam) zTTJNjPtBnyYz_wv-)l;L8Kh_f;Pq`yuTDc4A&jDOTvy7#*zg_NMSv1lAzI(i44cYf zjeltGCqsKr(pQ)=8)Mit5S04tA*RV#_DgJ>%@8U@pz+!V7SwVjj9hR!X7?k71NQ{` zrp=^wvmpJ2K*sR!#V8>Z#Uyk z%H$-x;A^(DP+p}3ix4ov8%Vf?7*X|ITJflX(GiCEm`u3$HyRJvPiaz8Z}{>d@O$N; zQh0~MYP!iD>82cir5g=-D0J;yY~<^lmpW|41>fBPx4EExkg6K@34jcCkNhD2KGa+o zR7Vc(&rVQjHejR$yC9+YYCNN~<^pUXToa|8dZ$}OVea-;NmJCcSx@Y`TK!;-FlTnA=cEU4U`;_4NZA%*~7 zOVM|VYsfQzNlcc?WrZLdRjvn(l7jwFCOhU*zY08|6Dh>lZ+(m~&SgUrMYKGyIcp9q=?m1N_f39)ZwCObwvc|*i6d6dtBh&FdwS`aZ zN3%4+(3serqBKxNq-AD9QDkx$R&Pd=UXb$wMeh!O(sfU~Fz+TZ0qk4l$`y!^io&Uy zG~mfi0!0LCO(sFTU=OjEE$d49S$D5lR<)fueED_ug|X>*Q@fFrIK=5!A%LZwPd19) zNKV>YYq~W5^-@zSkr)d=Lm0Bq2iAz^My45=MT7yX-B_5&LO)Eq=^-s*5)v$cGAu8^ zKBfwP2y+(|%&eF;K)*fCE(j;PY7?YBtHp(jd42SAf(t-x|LccL-Yy!aQQ_ zu!{-5#L?%(7rCDTOca!vODipAgZ6t3nJLv*9`JmGzK4RKYFMOjZ&~2@wY8$6ai)KN zzW?LZwJ?kWUMhp*reMf7F>-AJ`%E-Ejl)0OauV*fI6RrdG#JIkVyIINTehYLegi!K zS#caS=C}%Rz`Ac)X^Ye1x>I#opD8E@r4>+(6kv(CRG~j3mC%S@9v0VaN47PE92tw(WkpFGAcmKrU>B+~NOhM{F7VO;xLgMq_ zL?k?&+s-^NgWRgIq~~{d=)G zpD5);S{?IrB@f3mxZMvK*Ph*f8vrb|2*h5tEbK@LJJZNYv3s!jVejdGFBW45rc{Rd zae^wT5~P8ZK157qWIeh4N+Og#De=8niO-XK^Ld_x@oe&{Hz_9VqM)78iBgJEsdQSx zOd>~_NM%^p@5O@rvgW#N+8PpKwQXi<3T2BaFf;qLk293#oj0sBTOCsOX z$uUndE%zNL2ub$^vm{{{iPo2=dEld~h|dz>{GwWIWf|V1CC@N>7O16Y9hpH9Qfebw zYRwx#w7>%g;0VZ=2c6LqO7y1kTpaOBp~6U=_*R7Of=`d+2l()DQKsQ92A5n&&i?Rw zZkd2>rB)`Rp&LPGabP}gubJ@E z1}Tj-P$Ih@UrqEkr}2T#v?YJJ~oOM_S?3FE_aQ|C!6+~>WgZ}0dHNd%<7rftuU}oFD%htG)KaJ$JT#2-o54~I0imu`+YtW z7X#@)8^{and8rPU?Ox0|T+g1meTMGntIFMs=sc<%0@$HP4F4}Vv;?-2eW5reRhSe% zEfp_vd6YHkY+J&-1^H&q%-OR=z~Oo)j}QjA8Hz^mmV?a8s2m?ZqOnN78g&&59YLMa z0$&aNyhS&Ep~8qsTKxE=wB6DA03Y_?Xpb0u}3cCESih#){gSK8*v=m=9@G(+;yO z50EItC7_ZeboVdnnJ(KfRyovTqR65jLN$H~Ob}atS>`cz+(WWKgk2?QJT0kKgNQm8 zwS&rbp#cjf+e9*o!jGG)1iPQ84q6N(m{s&Jl7mwiovH$$A)7Cg(hD&9gZ#j9}-bzBegKB z+?5F(DG2iF+-tLJ)v{%E(qRu zD6=cltFnoXlvkisfVcuX$lPlZ{`rx)Tguujvt+l~`@-EO8{RPf{ zp=x6B7M2+h(d``Znl);n%(XQHxncR!z7gm|V1fA+hCEZA`c0fsP_mr@N|JMP&09n9 zX%Q-)zj=!k5Jk821EoxxCovG3`R_Uc(3*`Unxw$f0e zs^VZ6)1z-R`qMEfW|M_Yz3x4F{c_eSUZ$HIX$W;Wf+*+_LpRE7g%~#RQUSh`(_cCC zGoOVAUHO8M4toreb&HaO26nDBsaUO4d?{-ks>$rc0>DHpT!Gj(0I?Q*2p@iXG?6Eo+5 z40G>9x`vTglDgSTcJ**NiLUcJt$d7_fK4M!r5EV0L4g+3yd9q#N6Sb_xf(O zU%xG3yyZ@_9NJRPD4k(A5@o3{3(LgJ#`j`Y)$5B2zjnsNez;<2lxt^KHt(QpC!(0m z4aZXPd_|xx@;Xhb6$pos>H}9yesoOL*e2l!c4JW4*H$_~_8}_VY4LceaK{2vx5X}0 zTov7~8odjQ0mBJO*)cJH$ShRd$wxW^+mqEVm=6;HSNedQ76=YhBNc9%@yG?;3QrI~ zOwSYf?+FjfXLNVqSuJOd*n}Zc0GJ5_bBIuFkcSP&uULIsbNs>M@53^F5!+>ttg;_y z8OzB0_;~f~dvQ~6Y*&MVIrEOfBjK7a6;zu5wn5CY5EA7I!vR`>0KcO5&{;;pE6&o?KYD{td;gu6ho3%q`s7D=8Xv`t=Q2yH z^f*yq(|mKlQ}X~E4t&Kyz5)+!gMgtWc|G@D7@&?4P59)GP3 zU;~wZ`%pYrkEIw0cM?$!1bu;$TsPgvHIKk_z!($`Qkl@$E&N48zu77!r*V!*LeAI3 zmPFdPI?5wn%Yd?(Ch1-tiDRaqUq_`;V(P>Tw=jB%kXWmtYg1124kRJQ4KW(GUe4mo0eoIL@}#Db4g z6-?I|<$vaT3<>=*Q4x-wBEdqqAkrv)%pEC39Q_q! z)He0Om-}w4$Mx;D9?oiRVTn7T_JlTAY7R+3 zR*4F1vOZ->=ZCD5q(=9)WRP)ZQ9%2G{A5J* z9sD*2cQKSi@I_AqHLhdVk<&Ue(MU6;)HO3eVyC!q89@ig_WFuervo%sy6}PcSqcBP zEzeOJ9%L{UD*t2w97<&W`i8<_5pqyFfn4@;`r2L!g(iJ`o&!PXsi-3nQlXG0aEbe2 z{hkM$wGlQ%>wjb|yyyLYxDa)4<_bFK>fVj9OI+sck24CS$5!ueYzWPtNP==|($?ER6d8o7K2JWItzUSoSJ)hUv>MNC)lPnT^!=~RlO=sM+pK~_nA>mY^W84@~e zLfl}c9X%9aGZ(`hiFx!$z7KUHL*lC`m#H3wKh8k@&tB(O*!?nA4`U1XBZ7t|E1O9mz+fa9v}UEu-W_HJ zmqy)!H&ZAIGTnuL%0lgFPbg=*y)WaTiXeVmoy>!^n9i#wya64zSvwya=9?4nS`9i% zNv_EBwo(>2dHn7M$(Z@eyd9bcBed){O=@u^Sn#4(`iFlOqIl;927#~=>thON9Y&MH z{JGsYEO=1{dkNv8>;<`VlzeLl6!L#`^r^5CnPCwYHMx3!+O45|xccka=RIO_Vox_K z{K%_KC{5UhJS`L}R4KSp5!7c8Kl$(hc6%9|bkIy<9yqp&AiR`aucew=s?ppC`Eh|b z4)5Ta)X-oAOXS_^4NGdnQMDZ4Dd%2QkI_&qitivc;Ln5v)!Zt$Leg^!{ zwUu>sUR)}N^!K*)V)>r@^N3!<2$*`A^^n{kwIa*4);HF57}gW;FD-gwMaMdg5ftBm zs26&9RDMH>a$ikZ&DK%nL~AQqd6F4hmWts4s^_NCSvc@6HdOA3!#(0~}!ztElzS%&pBb zOFabD^m@q8U0%Z+SC4RD9~VfgR2!}w){*&j+dzM$O?7s^u%yN#zBoQ_`s6=(T=>KX zdS0P_zlX2>)5j7HvU3}@QoHAqZe0+(=+C}2WaDHl;2&ete7?`foiCT3!3*;+jb~Le zRAf|3mVyk#!g!_#04|Q&FW%ukgc9|jWk)5IPHp1a2f@^ch!by@_FUqo>bjqCYONV# zJgMuL5{z*)GjGBg25vtfBpmNca8bK4O7=j14~7b&XQH5B6F)_(oZuHUdGBmb+e*1fR^NJl)3RK=$7 zxW~33eFCYM)D_avpKiB)@TKY&tTaF4Q5q&X4lxY@fL^bD(+fsm+)W2WGPC8eD(NPF zwk~@C!yM@VI2|atY@K-I`U}KQ;81LrsKR4*f=jWrDBNWH4hak>UMa~%#$b`nVBKQX zwHB7@U1$hig`wxSZ1je{t^%1f|Jb3F$S1Z%H56^&Z=TA2vie20y0!RIa<}X9?q7^J zLM2@!$1{>e2m0Bmi^TIu_;YmO>zDU`O(hj!9$?Hm$qUgR(*hlx?ioJbrT@73%`&13 ziUut?W5AA~PR_n7FbZ&Qgm(tYX_bLpa@R@NZUiqFnT?b2`*z(Nxpdb9BjD0Jk92d;^d_(e9@mVG zJOHxx?z{NLh3z_Bvl|R3HW-|Ll0W$N$(kubBccyXMNkZTRCf^KV<>GJn(2&1P$c;{ z8g>Teh2~tJfY~FvJ2*bLgqwOb&Yw6(H4oDui4(rEvZkZh)7qooH}>KskAy5bG|YRHrdYOQ?p z>Mc5WP~K+i;8BX|g~*OpVmkkIG|dX@tY7pRDDuWUu4O~U&+{Hp@H*7T(=VDS>ISy8YMv$wX1@$E>H-od7@3?6vjHlxFLQbVRO-0Oa zrChJL$0a$W^-uhN>=__PTiO|3zz`c4$_bQisdtgJKJHdGxK(7q@^tBriz@C>L5^cwhKw4`4nfl^1jQ_I*o3Laol2FR$dBiW& zdD9|G2yEtN%>6S1f696wXM1UAaQ@s~v>#X$=5>}T*d&6LT?jVUSVttnEwr@~ zr?t(!xVi!Ee}q{C+0RJ-cfI5aQ)kuK&J*veJ?Sz1V(wk54%$OSLj z9(bvB1nZ!_byHS$)YkdwJK||u!i2Q8??#Bzu+9dde2{4~65u4FC;o9HI# zBmz5jUk_N{y{{vdfZ`nZ3Q7fRXRxPxY5g>=O;5K7(A|u^(e^5R@o~iyjrZGTbYgcA z=tR+!1j<8ag$-fEhQA&L<5)!ywN2GgZZwX09e{mL$C}rznm+Y6feASSgWy0LZT8MY zkVIgPe@;_*R6~w1*elEk?}+>4G8EF{4>Z1>r+9l>2%8z%$Cqc%%w?+8ukz!aG*0z6 zJy7bI1!Xt=4J39(W6Wn9(QoQOoXdC?Si%jGB#p3GIRG`64Rdj&9SK$!h{$Db2IPSW z43Yq*hQ`~_CC;+wJ`Sgi`r~cXpPLu!2Whp^fBL+*`+MVN;qrbzq>yAea7L#W8hP4@ z7eWQ7x*7>$pvud}F3)%9X&m#I9baM3dc84#6u6!^78Zvly~a)1frT1jr?ED1)l8%2 zQMbL%@1rRZkuf0c#^~h;8c%MlHT>^bsvZ|`n2f4iPWwf3IS*C*4KhcZGmFhEj(>yF zf46Z%vb+{ccL*hOVbGyk^a*8|zBNs|LIK`?0~Fxt9{~#RK8hJ%2zOeDOz!XSo`VIV zJaZ)c9767NZjUEa^1B(7Q`eRe}a@rvn(a?R%n`2&H(k^s`SXZ&hBjn&Sjk` zkfnJ|D--}*dWHFnB8M%Q1LKQP-Z2W61M)y|k%cgk@|64YZ&m?fyFCF6}XQ@<)6#iX50ybI|8=T|(-cS1&Gxzh&=oC`V70yCh2cH{~xMu0Dwu zBqhOX3g(r=owmTH+4Gblj?|nD3b-D44)vFFBM>uq^<_Tc1rWN1&s~5FRZH>{;^>rk zF5zt>V45qQS?8m>d)+I;C<`2ee~I2-Y!_~=BKbN2^{DoMlz(wsBJ8AHzKmwbx)HSC zBG(YsrUk1B`pN7OXXkFiBe(|3fYi!RXKzF&B6M=-I8v&Be;#qmN;R0j)nZX4;-t8# z0soJm-1=S*gG5^@e?UZXO{;l$Z{w}xUGL*p|Jr0bB&IP_#M;_Ax>+V-f8Z~;xIIyB~?a}^{w-|e~lXeNtw!D+iLRhfoB;YWBxiiKq6p0=39C+Jg^JQNnxpN))IZ? zkj~PWB2rB`O?C7B(#1%;VrFkR$_r+oSj4$u>__IzYK}yuHqkZs9l5z}6JY{M3>Fc8 z@fn0B_=3$a#KlrOe`R$9c7Nqj>p0?a!j@D09O+>IGy`kLg)}{TNt|R9d;R5X40Qg8 zqeB`RPElpB&g+^ZH?UdfR}^KI+$sDs9z>)yPjyLGx2Xlh@ERRb3vgIdkMc=0K0!E5 zc>tSRglJ9Agb2>D9LTzquR=?yJgCI=A=p9h!5G-yo903@e_}@%8kQ7g%#DXj8LC^D zaz@pWQ{<4-=Ns%T=QyOevAmU+T4zrdd?_Jkhn8{`_?AuIgvxo^@L}|OsH^%W)qrOw z?^sM(Cv|d>in#l|Mu`FZmP!0@#4H5Y{1e7r92RK@Gfi!n7*16unYmu3<9&>@0Q<4e z^mMvMZ~;d5f1jdMD}y8vg|V<8Hmj2W2tYT_Dy!P!LZmqk>N zgUE_9si*#X){t9F&1gHW>0tH5lfzR;S0M8J_z`MZC?L*#8=T;xXRtihhxfpG(6oI_ z2lSbS8)-JC&cczL>|`A+#4(G^X>>**`*Er#ksbM9e_$okI0>;<=qrMCwedX7t*ZF4 zgw~$&Ax4MszoG8h%gpo0UoR?zBY2Gp*;k`(c{m^q?!wHz24CnW$K+XF7?RCMm$xXZ z8UP!01&%mD{`sxD{wJEGdH=~%tn)7|q_~tmWQq>Y7opWU#v-Yhbj)fQv-s4k$+;nxKdm5AF@YAFXRd#UJrWX2qcw z^JpIIv!?q^vHF6o&%hHftN+|zTr~aTA_+h;$?WZRC!RIR4IAb(q|zclHRV`K&G67W zNwDjDwiAhhmWOnl@#6?Lt99yrQf%#}@6s+=a#&l9XkgUuiWC2fh89OBIZ~0RR>dGG ze@oV>=){8tlG}REFS5suJG|Lrgq=tTrF{`#a!tchel&pyX4|c2`|U;`xN@)kS_a{O zsjkeRnDA|kVQOaj~0L)2Aj*_5YDSznbz<1?ZrTmAwy4Fw(~%=7J$*RO0qQXe}0h> zb&77NH-MBIqNcr_VV(3=&Y18!xI3!+G*29!`w%R$qV#@huwGCCN zaQ_sDju@98n&Yxdy@7nb?#|XMe`-0)75no+KypjTaaM;jm(2uR%J@Vvi8MO2@LuTP zc#5p`H=Yfb#>m%&L)Ee1{Z;K4t$b}p zbed1(x|u2@9?W^-SQ3lA1YmWEs4I~8XB_8ytho`K>=u*O&PB2j@T}1Af7tlqI+0L_ zp%X}Sc85yWEeg32jn_)(=JDP#)LOQxd5!2?>^roI+_4>n`-v}o!{$muB~_g{MJ7Gq znh^?8oJEOf)-ZPn3^-C^)Xdozv;*nrYCir^J6+RH{Cawf2Xs6dHZ4LPwvZOgcG=r> zLq0e*8TF22cuMYrX80Zzf62A8U=Nz{_Qw`ooB_{>;*~e-9V!{kJa|TNW8I7n{qowO)YG#i|>^YJeGH zfCcY5p%>{V*<;^lX2*_uM0Is$F@m)V5Y5WS$oO$T$BzAcKOUFlR*fpQkQ z4h>4*4{KwS8ccGl7%x%iPq$Yy;0{NjkJU%MGWE$FJMhq*RTtzgdtTyw~<}n z2tN9H5CkwbF`88A3Z^9Z7R60jhpsNxL+>5?NH;Dv94LH<$|~o)beslC^I4_Zk_@G5 zyyN;UiTxM4%H-cmX{EE2A@M%AWb%M|C zl6x#+F{bi%D5d=u(qL1p?94fhKIev*#xG^hT*Qi(Ti@kWNy1#9rI3aia9d)>Nn!NX z(uPY{e=a`reXYFw4#Ne-TnuN%^_ZOEMG6nZ|^ z=anuY&*9qsK$Z2UJ#q2T0P;tMb1&hL;Ec9fe?V_asE9Y?mxa}Vk-)@QxvaI6r?n`k zBpIAN6dR8I;8hBq^`xKB-k1~V*_#0;#t6b1ix`l&I(Kbd#(4-9S<6o&@HLZ*nM ze@Dq32KD^&qlOh@b~)1&0&F0|Iav=h)H6n!r7G8wL=tesv1wv`lAMXV1h{6o0F38H zj&;SDIFC(XI~G0PPRbIuOcOZ?R;vsyb{!RgGtXA~Yz=ro*~?1M`Kyf6)3v zN6GA)&EOE;gBXK}fotCzm(q}PjrA$BMaP+EOP{rSQVbnmc*g909vhjn1m?Vkjh3Sl zoWzg!9H(ZyyTLVU{un`qnogTtFJyTJkPO{w=gl#K6|8)*vxIf^)~#}MKDIeW2} zALq%N!Vt&C^qd1p!`04Zp%WjQe;<6dRAiVPwVs<9E8%#KR%INZA}zEy7E6etfMC+T zpVPjhb89(a3waTfR1BH`L>T&;CUY88xk3j283~~76CyLTBNkxkRbk)bzR6~e=iat# zFlx=K-MzWa5eD8QgT{L(r|))aux$L;Zfu~A#paH*?}7>)HW7+;wj%c{f0^$iw&&Pi z@84_FX!T;ID5Dyb2WgTZHyiYIJS`umyP>`$yH!WdYHKUPOhrv$s;8lZC@5Us+%+@0 z=npY#U5mM5a|6wG&ulV#B4_ids(MlQo(CVX>R9wy(<%~7Dwr`*+q6hccqB8jNzjRWf=YS%F6okchv5g? zd5UmOU(p5}Q9;FSGrK{G5hy^>E)$+XZEs+(xMzO2$0|9@181`hI*=*T?v6Ox zXuHEtBebQbL22d2P&>jahf2G<22_vvnnrYazxsePL8Af8r>_KrnGira0YZF8-$-OQ zXU^{#v|z~T3o%ME&$dynQ4rSAX0q@O1p9-_Cv8Ux;wE4Bs_0+v1ansJt20dePCQ+< zGtY;}?eK#WkrJHGLQbB6Chh+6?;pOs0uNSl4zvfP4}IJ48HBwe&^5DTP@Bd5pc%nd zV}rD%T^eA)IaytxAr{)xikr7=h9!A($!LS;Jj4*?B=hHT(`;voGlsdp>p4Z!`9Y8;i?%KwLd^XssluT_cNP@- zfib90e-v}xSU}<}@`a&p!5h|fE}4|cf#jL;#=y7L!C9`qNtm>1Ka3U`b+^~{j4nBO zna4Cx<7l!Ta$MicSl92@`#kgc4IU_0w19$5ig*EgCA8FAFqVp7jQuX6Z>7Jb&RQ-h zogb`%Y6TU#z)|HjXBaQ66(U*Rzz*9H#7$Y9e^LQzJ<}#K#Ngw+R!ua;XDdoSCD;&j zxO>^@g5B#|c%kYq;Dt3#%U{^>?Z5f?UXK`~g;|RpBp8xb)ek^&f&RM!R#s^VMN`cYu6fq^s zc^8k!32`1cA{@t7)E6H7u$wn%!{PO6hCbm_tLMGZnd;rI+!~M zfh}7k&aKG_4f7Em@%LFoSdPRjS?wbOe`p5ws+wDvNvK|Ml`VD{6d;mjNs>e(8(+`>_+06WGz7jdnt<)uNY%q6h2q3hTT(x@JUZ5 z1;WdIx|FOoTBN^_WOI!zkOR0hCq~&UjY)uPnj1MtSNAC~)%kG~d|!v?KFLUme`oGn zHBgMbKo_)&{+NpDD@wGKH2HmJguRQ|&JF7k@Wrd|-G(mI!x!S&^lY_Vl5zD269-C{b$;Wp4uyKpq!2iAxE$gVuJ9sf63}Du!};9 zm(ASYm@$>}$&?*^rMjKUr}HT|)f84`fsMIbdNk+yIZ2iJWg1l4%`GF@DzM@xXmn;d zBfHETdcJLj2&F$|>t&9&1;e41z#haZXWRw@q%7r;0W(SwD2U>*6(O%sB>IOD?AFRP z6DdCcGI&xU6I3DNA$ zQH8>V#^W`N5;uf|WIr0Qw26D*bnEfAhm;O;!yn~^b^Ft*Qo_5nMtRmrbpg3Db~pgRQq{t6e`n&?K4#t6)Ph&KTgUH^eJ6uLLJO$%06`N zM$O!gG*ITwTa~PqdCfiXC4@%RyDQR2s{3WF0-SqQ@CinP<3fwrw+6C(lc;|tyUp* zyN_+cfWRKuescO3Q()w{+83#rVxcAy?5+Wl$`e;gtW0(1%}ohQe<`r8?g zfoIu9n^RuGHd)2e=Q%7@FuanhkROKy5H3vCKLqS6jD6%V-mp9Jd(~LGmvaC4>PsG z&A7#nJx_b8a``j$@vj)Fk9n>f|IEOVqoGmg+%uT$zt!bL*+u(eq-K7Zy}=X3?)o8R zG-hQlvfjlulU>*wV`r^yl-$LqU0wonpm**X{QSjwe%1%7pgo^m*t&E2JIp#OHeS(%H(rDBeuoHQZ8hLc>o0ZZ-Ckm-+U9_5ke1 zpb`wFG(4ELX1Zg&N~fTQYU>~sg(qFbDbK=#Q50HY>7HG)j_%;SCk4+!ZJ>&n z8tSCow2)|_$dQPT?H~TIr^`4*MAM~e?wcV_f8imDvlJ8gttSYshHU^Uk%GZH6oF+E z+`(pado~@Ybe)#Xvco!~k*enQ2118owF?v>LTf36ll?p*rmc$YQ~qG1K>k$vO@+RM zw^~;lbKWBfthDet;quX$M~dV^>%{4>P5Funx6HOO+sO>@L;_^l6ZijO#r~R5R6iFP zf1CUqG^i&Vtu=t;oO}=h0dU0Pb+t7*4SIU6ZtAvspH_k#*G7NQ?l<}sV{Y1rtDSuN zvAo=|?gd^L% zK7I9@Mv;(9Al8(8<3que=6^~=LOSYNO|+h$){!8%QA_KRh?OC>PH$W zjk2EG`D7{*`y+CRQr(hrCaJb4tij1_{O+y_D%ph$dn)&UkO^Gm6euev9dEb7upvu1 zf0d}YF-z!iY^3jZ0|(c#GUbe7olO*&xR|W*NSCct?n!$}yS9vzWp5Kf%T)Z+f4@_a zrd>^_)ukg6)h*iyX}!sXsL4A;#K}EB{-rN&9;OoWkgav~!@oNPw2^$YqbsqL1L>My zLcYNPgu8k$+m>{yr&qe?)t0@5BkJ@fn`P*Z?s+bRIp{tVz5h3Wi%2O?+tU&Dp`#;^ z?@d%T%88Zc0;3`B+&oyP9WW83f5wI0cN4TQpFy7hps{FZAMgA)&{xYt3rBMgXqg$O zG~%0`3J_T(!MZ$s-QF7x7#0N2S~L1C)YU^Gl;TgJ)Il5$RlIYv8BBh$C#*S7NyHtTLz z>ye@sD8Ew5;{=hVbWEohf2uqw;L3bf(Ufby>24aX)5Qf0dUzC{A9z0KVPdJ=m@QeT z_$@h-Xzw99n@+kkU}RDaK-5@{N~GlO0N#MYUwIW2Cl@mzfdCCM@|3<+G<}fsD&?Y- zg^PcY0_U1bBpc1GDQ53<+JESw=eO+vS1d9*pY?a5+^}xV_(@H3f4AwTVk(WQKb5u3 zkRj`=vCoZnE66m*8-qBx@3ByI#}O`^b<7s4L}b@CkX?{_@AJi`8$?b{nt<2RaTzMV zRE(=CISYSp3TkO9*O$eNpBDO(0O#ydLMsPeDJMXNY%yzeZ>+-KpjD}BwYNt-!=7qs zOeeoRGO;x}aaPSOe>KbBd8wnbnPdDXbYCTXQ;>_xEgk5p8oonW5B4M$z2CSAIMHlR*wWIb4F^ z*Vm7bnLk_he|2!mnPSntQ6=*_-d|IhRBvvzfj>p#_kN>let~1-%BX zUH`JzOG>qDV4XJ(#yLKEB`V#Bb}68~fGO=*f>$ez_e}Z}hT3+_7*)?WV;E<2ikO%2 zP~^A#!4qGNtKk9~8wcnqrrgR*1wtw$S7UcID5ug?e->CY24Ti{mW#=oa{1FyQ!z7a zF1HWAuUI7Ve4as;WJGR_*d{|5Yai}rP`NVC$}QVs@;2T1$Zf7C!+s|8*?br}!Mz~Nk# zM=?~C%~R?{Uur_x5#O2>1~RZ~JIA&CxP133A{hW?0lrrq;n;<{R(yvVVwOwA@*Qf< zf5Ku`rXcD#EB7kM%0FNIOwyw4y74YHXb_vM3g=s^G)jTo4DG_H>~VBk;vI{+3wPc1 zgaaNm4174$jip;|!uiv|M0O{c40N0;LRI$M`-VPXVc{E1a>OYxp~H~#`;R5fItCMa zk&TFLQV~N?voBGOdXG<>Q9;SkDTWRVe>c$myI^oHq>EGbztn^XGdDDMz0cZ=xBw!D zR^XEGklJ23P zo|xv8FCf?$VuIAC%(l^zaz8|c2Ui*u-Qb6Bh4CmyS|b#)l*6Z>YM^lI9b&{L%}=m>@ z!xz0+5q6eYCKM>pFtCF{QRUr4e*s+`^yDJ_MvrR#K>Q(u1U`bB`spKu%mSCEF(xh* zx9*TWKOv1$xRN_|D$=+!zub{d_nra2@b_1UuymG9L4m!6bZ3i5msMJof2X4jFS0uY zQV4sg-ZMFS2UaxZ>qxlqo{Hfrt;urguGQ67qJ2Js1@R$wxiAgyb48K2&=Xe23mxUI z_lu4=4oM!n=_HmaqA>CZpl5H65H?koCH^!aa>)fIoCg{_!^)aTa*AniftfO&v zdwo5axCK<$R1QU4qAN4Ae@a=sw~(z0R0?0F)&$?@MrX`VL_&RhD`ze!ZroCH7=6+L z;skZr&D@k6IULx+o@Tm$sD=X7is;mL%F>{4pvVG*TEiX^OIuAX1E)3i`&hLU9=TAM zd9&WqE*20pLrCp7@6Ci;B_&GQ^wO(5_`MPP9nv^y@eMz|6#6g}fAUzYlzjqVIEW*3 z_^9@cwOt^1*TTjKV)$3DnJ<8d85A^Ts)^>LDH+B6pm5uAVqDlwvy9{)t=j>CInMf z(XqPC>Q=x$Xu_rof7fC`y3?)U^uQkSH)IaM2YczET8)+AK8O0PMYzj4e@G*!S`ZM0scCw(Cub2q zYUh5L7HBOke29sx3k)n!T{%o@bsGi}=@*x(Nj0CA;W{(#^R4RX5`mn35MPw77lS$|Am|u(ZHBOv?uyRG zB&!2@h#Vd15M_9kqNzn2dCY7i$>0LY(#HM@oiwaTe}-D(D~OhYoP4--`E%O`Uc&x} z?GFeyzoQDJf;*I<`u37TDo*;e(uC^oLyGHr(F=X3Sj?6bAZ|KIZ7`uxsWjX=EwGhJ zptKc3S*r&JSuY|X(B_xJrk=eRPs}ms5DO%Z|Ck@0`l@taR0#mwIBiSn`G6jLiOS{R zMR`7ye?aL4+qducQD}((R#S2_)eM>)1)N_7Tbphynw)NnluoU?ZNIyk(R71xpGa6T zEg{Is6uzxED^L<{v^#pV#_~orGDpRc`2|5vChwlKIqBu;_kAkvR(m zlBeY3RC?wnp6GZ$r2Sini?RZbz<%ed3^Pjo4~)k&i7{C{bH8dzyjD!Us_4l} zf0N{MESe)?bK9)=+q|jQg#9v=?Ym1`2S|KAdk-zyxdzHI3LP*>j3i00FqAB;luPBz zy=g5am}NU_tn|lBzZp&IiOskDyl(@Z)&^(BBErx2q?XlKuhXaP@=`Wu$T}5=DkF21R%qc8`H~hT{5u)(>U?xgBh-n_ zB8x;%9n?*46*Y_O%WkI%b5^#*7q6t==4kcEvb%0Tn`cy=2BUjM$?UWOf6+tLO-NoU zBd!(gK?>InLlgK85(NMob|XKo>ZO61c;Xt_m~Oqcy|MbjS`=Du zT+nXct{gzVlr_^u2>l`9z0_(5H^PAQHtoUCQON>_`WJH9ucbG3+g9_)XR$<)XsXL1 zeZd;B&rrg9YX9EdQdF6$e~5_djJ>%|0DB+#GC)AGY}z4XHWiNqVY97i#A@_Bbi7h3 zm$LA-@o`qKgSi6pFLt1UC{#$xL*{ZgFU9#T;MMebYyT|iop!Bh=gO9AQ&8`$KO$Wk zPQjqAno_FWqmkr)@s3H+Cm#gj^!G2W@G@76Vb3QNX?wy<=kxsif1~fxtV4L*Oy*Cz zapQ-hjSGc{B-QPss;x=TER3sDE}3d&+S$9f7sn5xLCKmnEDsBE<=1z@5NOxZ9ar9* zBk`;73?ws|{|%Jjt~DTGcHY>UP~2P`j@j7OMwlD7pQJ97E2ZcZzKIv0u<{nIv7i^) zwXri8t1(T(R6Dc@f1MjqM}aP5c{&RSQvof8G(}4~};PfoDvFe%#AC z%K0=3|5+)$$x@m*oA;{TUP?9XR<00st%iC;oU77HVG?2FgY+N!PC)}m2DdMkVni7s zm*SA9ajTMpiDzg7ohe)Vy9))jX);H(fLge&H?;JU4KqHgd`C&DCs~!t)=*@-#ot8_ z_vXhqHHAh-f4!;ikTSk%mJaWgsU;)VQyViCy;ZXA=oHz{KAl~RfaIV z@44wzUz*d3Mz2h^P+PV^-O!dxoxudvOd*7$7p(1!e?3ttzY5jRI&Ge5u%VS4eiFpw zy2;DoFH`V%P3v%*FUdKQGGGbd{#a31Amwxa-mXKQ3^C4G5kKtvr!X>Cw=H2 z8+qP+p`|MduI8+zbN~VFo-NN9%Q%S8cG!^^^MYLrJX0EAw{@?kI+2ZgHB5VTMNfZo zTaV)HO>c5PU#SLUQq!kRs~C4IFmWHtW2NwBe`JTrH|>J%GVRI>(Pq!BGV+k7WSoW+ z%G#0tl^ygh0?i&WEAVnM>4NbYv0GqGr0P>-gw;X~q`CoA7E2M8B_3PsWCU&pf!65c3|P6BVg3G=c`}x3=tZ2x^iz<^>L}+cWxNYTmQJfTsJzH zs!fhUyR~{IwXW8e?zNCW2}N0bCVw~VZRwQ`+)m+syv^U!Gbe~D-9uL;fE`vB;r=R8 zxb(C1Ly$RW&EYU%fBJ}~&E?Huy!;T~fBi#5Px<<#DffLd41GFtxA^JZ=+XDF?Y;<( zKMOWX=aipSfdD00M;lX4y9=N)Gt59CB%pkckbl5w+T7fG&wyn*@} zOdX-gxh4A{7#lw-Q2*w5rB^mNKz(4!=jcWrO1?Anj0zU++72ijfnGA|)caeve`N`* zUI{n`TViXSvsqeyLT_c@dzsg%0$xp8DMNkvu~TFhDTL8}p92zRj7=BtRBWRu#yBrW zZFL?{l!itx+WsaprcLu>!n-Hz|2}f7|6n8T$L;x=-P8#KAZ&_YQprRW;@v7N9XuqN z&Tp3x%0-4xv}AM@dU)FG8VTBA@#h40I$D}up$M3MmKQalR3yZ!{o zn7wc_^3E1Q+R%R#8?>6vqbm zU$vmfzLg<*UYN94#pYA!&poSrq?xwL!@p}i7K5?d2UnrB^~@~s$cCQtyxmy)0`jeC z^U0^I04Xa_B{UE79$8ovcjR7Ju2|v8&0dLufIX=i6+fL|}=0Rp2tap+{P)F_Un9as)u-2c_ z;r8fx+<*c)PTPH>Vg(Da`e@x^6dJvJ?p9S^@E0b(f29_njdD^CBvIbK5BWF_(^h7F zk61!qsDbUaaJ|b4AaSgjPIh^^52;;Tu8eC{9%iJ!?$@;I8W(@vx6L?fQ3XM}!c}{G zlI-9sp!4o)W_p@$-ZaHXb~N(KUNa2kbg8ke=zR|X-Z6xLb@H<(#ol{@*6^m#se`H zp8;Dsvc27Vc2goqj<-8r7#?BPZ>f|hCQ5!r9a=)@btY{39J^kZ9&f@r;~g-kH2xV4 zI!?FD4mXn&B$0vgOmHOaqg|B~hBK%wi_TiImg-K@Bb_hh!t*0Qx+K-7NFji}0dR-b zf2-nc;ef{DqtLLVb-qlQ7YN_Da>Gj?!+7DkWoCR~} z!@lUYEPt%uco7L( zY7~a<-mKikVJbD7NEHn+JFaGav$)hke{31rH!c?FR<3K?{cFrE!2tQvlYh7G{X)?sgC-{0_2td9t1)&YRl2oA}z$zM{;FGvoh8*Fuf+r zC{9j>{w~TKXp2BB{3PE}{E*tD=zVJPu6n-ujeB91-}Inng(6n(n=EIfrXpeie_oF& z-viqOeJka>;DlA$Wn0{BWFb<-$6M22YE%F)3K`TWsmRkChYHn!3 zQWB!2l#p8_<54pW_E=#8E8m-O@M%0RZNr<0#*3l{OQ3~FQay+Z^{igF1Id&bRm z#I;QswArOc{>-g-tC?&eGVJ@X;LpJUGNZqpq%(Veh2s_dwj44vGgO^I#g(zw7V4Uj zN|t+td~OVg=(3pQiN~@*!Y0%7NoiypQ12%AsA{;?vvoFbbl9qQj>?|zDX05RcPzDhY#;!t)4JVo0^p~TMs-n) z)+TnkV<8Sw+ywnIAkAt$eAT5p`jdQbwjGDntjNy-;?Fa!Teu*ZY?a!6rY~Zre+X0a zwP+cao~m?PQaS*Ef0mi$l8CG)yeYqu4l^J^U2w;A7M?Kh=%=aB$XS+*W=AyN z1?N5rs|T^bEG#=)m6h_OU0o}8eIPVk7@|jUm%Kr3eMgP{kA_e77c)ND{F=QyB4=Kbm(Vv!Zu9`e+l0}>OF-=_KnkK zMA3H{2g`wQ+ZSe;M#G&+_CM7`K5VXeFRbu;ng z4vwEifvOGaCvCcS9&kVIGJAgSm`$35dbe{=KL6|pn{)K&W$GkVwlhPg1DU!!QB1F_ z6ZCyFVzQjYvqfnU2#8NEXBoJwOfT(({+Azv2tO$$ClBEze^afSw%%yM4j%|yCM2r- zeXmrOrgL`0{3-f4pM(-iWF3j*mg1{6CyO|eD5oBG^t(Y%Cd{VC>?I`${PYI28M>&; z?H$dgS$?GroqjTMB}Gp##8wAWYztzcE1jBTmYokqNVT(#J3~gUe!dU6v~Q!rfwxjn zzrBoN1g{5qf3FhQ@7uPUYa**&@LC21M(=eC&YW($#b#!CN#cxwoSrb5Z1e*|VNu%0 zIF{qghkxOG(tNIM;&)2v<@DAZoHSb?7+gwu|MpI?mFLc&jjXy5t5ZIeTvnscr1h$8 zC)D^R@)M139ik@-_q%^vJ^ZWScV$#uF%H_q-d}U|f88HBE`qgN?K;S3JFL%`vAihw zdv%m#+%yr@DzR(0&N{Lx>Y6XTw$>tDr&c-|yN(a-RrZ1wk@qG2gkXs*muBTfo zKved1V7;u$hXUWW(J*G@wJM8~{l;MvvjmYSgaS?3{%m)`OL+LU)}EX8Gpu-aUCOAG z?X77Ee-h~I7c@SGG({=9;yBmQVPD3(>1wMpL=e`)O1ADu`rCpxc5ZCP!#}F-jx-S< z&tRbJnR6@-#g2-9GZj>YY@KO&11~LHB)RYxW4#_Y@p-$`2VoqsA7qJ1a!Sd~`f&)u z4-*U=SBxnlwP|EHvaNTREr~|aHtijV3xVC0f0oUwSXbI|+P&T1HetGjA@wK>oo;V3 z%u!vbUYDK&QhjL4+}_H7s%X zl+&9$(JElSXntpDISQN%{_Ts|qqL|gh!Rmk5QwSG=V>NOk!g*=r0l*46TN84PB9x# ze@u#4n&*@FY+=v6>ju{8g#7OJ#jB6UOqY-c)kWz;i)=ijvDz19J=E+` z@ws#Bc+CFZ$bCKuGAIg%tmZ(E0AG$3w6h~&GLmLZl)1;8pm2tz1cH0#l+#()joZ~7)eKb)DJ`dd2x32~(JWhNIyuT^ zUVJaatL5zLn4TITz)(YqV3D~=(+%k;??N;c$w>(M3y5A_nHAig@1PAb~%);P;W9L93;9R9It1FZ#`rTlq^=^=U;n6IJE#yBmlR2L%dN zmgDLI_jKHnv1rNjwb(*#+O!&5e}dlS1w~A2Z>FJ=<|^B?QF#SP%bGFlKh{DfyyZ}H z*==b@-$}=zHHwPL>GYEboKf*TwjG|Yz67yD)CqPx;Q$1k2y$g~{<0Nd{p#0p?xlUX zWiwZD0CeIEIv6DmIOM_wQdrTo>r@o+y;>9(BpkL&bAVX6^MeV0yHkQAjh!o-_2)?yZNee>rQBauG$z07XE$zx+}=wDRnug#7XHsgQR6v&tHPXB;fV zOLsuv;TaqBRB@kEk`)Q!eJyKWA=Dm3<5E5Tqp}#iG?lG{Q7*IBAGqQh!6d1rFWL zGUqoKPztbjO~s?bc?NiBfyR(#Q9Z5P!D8jPGzTV%Bh z>J;qLd&d>)pkXA)i?ywaM%sZWMo?Yv^X{})N4UI=j)EM^_I<0`hc5DNs_4CmNIxpY z{GG^F{m=JKZTX%wkA2MBrGLZp{Zn@-+1rseSdV$Lbno8x&D3@?YwJ7;esI$d^?SY_ zCurbTn!ZeJB+Y}6zM1yK^VL@Z@h`lxfVpJDJ9@b)Wk`&|h*Wsn)jREr2Zl-^C3jLd z>vii!qKiDQa41&Cv+V?OC!rOVJmN^hHklRnp|_A>dQ3!|)ThSjSbx^$CRH6K=n^NI z_Nti@;Y9{gjXE?lOg8Ym8fWO1N}-Pis|;~#QFuF}=-f-cW_fOW)_joKCcIKouIEwR zZ0r)0((;$URDbC8=I3meZR)fug+<7|p!K8YWSVQiSxTLOu2+inLzB%e957sXooTHb*mtkdqrT2fQGhhiR3H z_;`Lni9JZS$$!{G$0IkGfG$yfA_mUG#{3TgZD#1N;0Z`_kCq1`DDeDrjY@f{15maO z=R_}q-$q3Pn0IWqQo#~yFRI5G@8;^OOc$OfMOj^GW`=xKk3h6~TdRkdkBn7w1ia4P z(xk{|2C?!#f_eOVc+O$EwD+63cP8LWmYiyj3SxN7E`NKkfOT|howVq+Ls-Q>T;1+? z;5mrohQrr;1Q$Hft?xD-L!PgG1w8n;@YV=>YQ`{&Y7@cuNEK1*D;LgCH~1Q&&B9sJ zzN;(!3;{##h6&H)RT?sx!yDPxQyJu`c@prW^J=<;unY zx7F5t&<t3h=jtDMQ{Z}OQw3bs?1JIgz+T?X-8$^|6X2W}L={3?&E z9uJ%T00otPO8GL6_yoIp$hzz%YvnM~p%po~Cx2CY=L8~txJwg;$9iqB2A+0h&e|FH zK-b3Wxv*-Y75R_IFzq#CV3?l}ncN#dIhvJ58y8D9B>HBYC)Rcbq@D8c%{E(($87V+ zxKN%}=5H(=oeHlh>cE0lGbt3hM!`il_)QIdv}9QX1UndOt%smot*-YPobDh{5$biF zyMGIpx_T@>4H=>VSgKZmFhNpfh8c<-7oWOG@?Q27Rehj7V#<>}x2T7`xB-hwWHDB6 z_Wo17AI%C&VB#v@$YiFzapPSaJ?Z=OSLx?-kH{Ceb`0e9EqN+U+4IfGyA+osCv%8X z3-qXR$2h#m6o9%7ArM9ckQdlW%0zv?^nctv3H8dqXw)%;1?g}PCjf!@uB&(!J|bKo z@v}_vNlL}gCE93L2+cQvS*xXP-_a-y@mWOozHOe-z!|+deuqc58~G)0WIyREka!~7 zK$RxPeLWcl0TnDEyiHJL+Ze=}J{!R`C4RxK@$aYt3Qzf(ddl2C>B|~Y63ZyBLx1Oy zSB9k&skkr#_Q%2cR++Y}pegX?QcW#%XALk6K&#LzWu~U^;F-ybG6iz2%m{RMVt=AJ zGMz*y+s`G2w&)Oc_w68qLp?fHlI4c|jJ4IR=L*=n_KmocJp5C-3f1b1U;RyrwC%os z3pJ706B(byjjy(cBlJuWBv?nikbn3sWIXC?K;TDIaixxUB*5=SOMhC|Nso{X#QzFP zjhq=fe!9^iS53G2kAFtT{X`<61OriGXc`NA;5ARhtr==cK435<*RZwY!31JYkU*-U zXo-l@#7gC}yDq5a-H_^# zLj|B0DBrO^IK9*Kw!mWhJg;~ZI22@<1!{Xg^bi=i+PXGlcYfZ|=Xt&~>vGyjM{6ia z{RU(IxfFirWT}}~(aK+kI*sr?;%6Ne~TN}(mbY~ zpsFUX^Qs=U{pxSp?jNqE;YK;zYQq@Mk%)EHSq$rq#$;1K29?s}+@VB{KpIgOQ>yg2 zThTilCbrBKhcgoxgO4wUSkdO%h+$qj-b;RX-DX{~IG*>h7JsGr{c$s|m0Lkm5XF2d z^9-IH(}32rch^fHF-Qx-f04*Juz;XA+m1>A9<`ppVuW4+4o$YRcl~yoN4MJJ*!6>f z_h!hAnY3f$(yC@ql*w``C8t2|1By#h!0BHjKYCOg#uyLDe!sVo=V3K*?Zi7nJxsHo zKR#}*zEb3V`hP#M-2@*pEiYY0Lf|^^TLn=JcHZ(RE70#*fmF#X{We<8>Jq$73vNHj zaAw^PDWqsavdLJ*wll7iOF(9&kAk}IR2i2XT?}@;gvDD3%=V+Q(|g3U^2l8eV!Uk6SsAJbi8up| zg%>%vWq-Z?A}Uu$ypuVFe#HLy4G(AMlh=9TC!NvJpYmBXRSnTwy6Z8~%u_4)==SO$rNG{21>~u;z@Z*B?h+KJ#?lHS z>&==}9v|oEfp3?aBQ_~n=Wb-FrmjtHs=6P@r+-c@5G~kv?fHE2{4Xnw;TRjG@M}`3 zaco0#p>GXqjt+pGP@_K@q~%{OBuS5`v!3}d_?e6_miclC zP=7k^ZShnk(?2o#s;0bw;^5#9BL(1aYMH`MJyrCaD` zgf}shZ17Ie?`!U}b}xM)v{~f3LdKKCbRi%Bt#jF()J7>6^zV_aR$MG zN(De^yKcd1=E|39_HH!u1*2Z)Hf=HIcz>t4%8Wpelhe)}=-~0A=5y3Xm^vTzJ0J%V zg{D2E^K^NV6qda`JCn+br>EDrliQwFvL;SwmZrNzyec?s`f2QMDDLi}XhhFLCP zCRwYz>Y*~xKxb4Br*86tSFU_aHfxBhGbxHpH^* zM<4}+YT_co@sHkA^jKTp)(4}S{62tPyuy(u+vLSHa>RN>{BB3Fo8y2;Ul*W_Zw41t z@v|)I9LjQCOPfda5K~IC-D>B+bw{COA7oSx_27^9Lu8Wm%?QJd>fmZ`Olzp#FxSy< zd?jrGd&<$1Nnm{KdfymZa<(uxeSaG=HY{eEe(s<@uT~w{V3?9ifFyKf%qo=_qCbgC z@kGFo;goCTpbc>R4Q5xW=&FWPX`5}#(FnI`5OIng8pTY@GICQ6j7#H{fMIHOxKPEB zI5N8PwF>-<^kW%&X2aOyL|Zs&TeGhPuJZHXFjJ_IfRCsVZ>NqcyF!18>VJ3@`gHY{ zW~*;hTjr1=|6N)-I&~X&v1udMCZ~3q7wWyktxR_e*{?n5 zOhTi&TK;aQY*5)PXA6b%#(y#0#czfTJkRra?cm4eeha=Eiet1~_WkZElL&&8qYw$C z@*?s(otLIq*pVRm`O%fqtn!&j-w16^;{52^xDdNG3<#Slm~;RJy)~u}xiAJA|3AO{ z1^*G*7<6h*Y1RIiwpq%d#A#$`YwZ||v%Csdrms)L03x3d;_h+yx_=_w4fM`B$r_fr zbm)@8K`G>x_Dr3xObxFqgBu&&RwTMS`dy%GCr+4PO}zrw9z?_eB?eY z-5dICQ8xl2V1Irh6+RpDQX>mwVgGvp+u<+(}uD<~SZl zIn4{2UT(`2;Oz9dKz#v&Hfy}31+ITN`m7RZeT?+wTa0Y3fQ*IrM**cMCNAXos$?he zB@vxXU6z@5^F}q*P)}16Bz6p6l`JM13u}O z)H$w);D0SUZ|{X8Nu3nvJg$y&L$ht}op&djq?ZCfH9K>kPh#jK_cJ?i7Dfy8Rod0} z!Jkt_E;I;Bu*G=$^Y;vF7w92BTQS=amkR-?OTM@_i-BSqiMa31#+mB)J&XX;U!|&2 z<^<-FCyF*aR_NcjUyy*5SY5gcX>NoX_A}X(f`3J|W2zrEX!f`F>{R9eb=HbOMTBo2afst?*P6McL%` z3V$U+z+{qpdn+C-(z?WOX(@2_C@F@&qp79l@hZ_~veEf$Fsn)Tp#JG<_LnY0l2;qs za?w+G*Sk;V;svZhlRr9al= z1}UA;p_yurJ~2ky%4A|&Li)6FQV#)wzJP$LB4g}{(uf3f2iy{2X~m5V$x{;OyCB}MH> z%FI2xL4~(uF^DRsEaBDuGXbOF1%nvhjD~oK*>Am-&>c?+_LsdXxr-HPll|Y&e}7kk zKP40dV6<+@FFJ}0)Z+lEBaC??(_u-`TMdlc+D3ZOcF45VWp(2$<8qbUA{-*QQ&#IC z<+C2jqp>G^+?o{gVaD>_Xki+}q`PD-09QE3#B1Q#8FXn$f1X_7bA zqAKN<$=bh$9$-IjnxX>r{=eA{2< z4|=Ex5=pT(8;?p5wUe90Sqx*?WE z^`!ka@73qHlYg<44HOW3u%NWvgYzBlYIK9eoy$9N3T1U~%xp2~0Gz*iVVHZu_=iBS?gmy#e4CSMZwtdV|UD*G#Ty?@gU&l3xX@3YNXWI-nRA`AI@R^v1 z46TY9+lzy|KH4})UNZbuwaRuRefO-I3H?R;&Lh&ws|!<;sN_8!z9Bc)Y1niN=;}co zua=gef%^;7Avvm2wSSXV)dj?b_eNLT*c?(&3FC@7-YF%2CUSe`i2~o)aE|-&_wbD# z)taK{Pc}I#{dv&hNyiB(a%Cq>$^!(YGq<5WKSlESso5V$hpR$dXo%;=wRn*|X?E#e zNc_RU*Kemi&oJ6Fiv_JYn@hi(*S;TQ?bMkcDY7bifK}6Smw&OH!kV#$Z3$QQLRaZ7 z){~71(A)1-5+FkSwoFGxRkhwofR>XP%kgFY0z#$`?sp@7)ZVcJ`gRS?MJ3E`%O1Xd z^xTcl+)dVtQmwpszWS_mmf-QEV;2~%fkXR(=6py)GG{){1ge( z{uh0Y@tN*(W5#NS z``^_fDA)e1oMM15`_>4>4B(Rp>`^EJ35w&7bzGcQ*HL!}k2zjIn}L!B+eD*r;L>0HW(Krboz1}JN@y*ule?ZlLcGj<`YfRMeq z?Nt+02Y;QT082z>X**_bvLGtzdRRQ_5d~Py8KWLif*}(1Rtn3M#2uA^cbQ5>8J2;s zY-7=^pJ{ec>r!%M)J0_Dds+-*2!OTusKEp&%9s1g7A_K7n7xVAM@oc7^*%7kCA9^2 z)qWk3$XUYt7e5-}d)_ZR-7w*B7>Er88OkFM6o0yEtXB8JqR4YCxf8YJcXNGjc)r^o(c=^Ln~b#^3G3zW_RMkzRZM_D*nI-~C&pNUH*t0S_{Awp+cr6@4(6 zoKEsrv#VWNHOFO?U*)?$vU$!{fc6$lRE>@XYIMio1+8Yypuy0$*!GBZr>!loLcagU ze}4`MT>9w)_3|vyvaCcU;!b$>Nld!C%eiL2>}0?zdUqxR92z4c*P^j3OqxhXMnN!G zgl%_?Vxl?#iL7TsnFW6LSy`oQ=;prZM6kkf(>|W?Wg{n}ih2TdHVX?gUvPQVdMyLY zp&bfyS85)uM1@GY9kK(BBoJe@SKB+WZhybeAls}}q939#{w*<)#g~g>cDiE&!IG7% zj$^eHYVTVY-6JM^);!2s7|xP8ci~i+y|*?AtB(_uWY8+7p0Fn~IZAOk`vRxNinG_2 zX0Gd-J^7vAluocrw1C(i3Vy))cIY7m3LJ!dV3C|bnohj_7s{a)uk7@}rgM}L&A%(+FplXkEYv3&BIe|N=vYBx zCn3d;N(sMs_Rg!L{wgZ>7#CQWDUdGUlMZh3>D zo15QRD@u?ZD7VtvA|*vvizY5v9eaZEr=obNATav6IjNgnS_->eQ_Zt^!#8S288Pxt z-Mv3{xNOepxi&rFtN&Q{qJNZvzf}@t&MhTkO#p`H7R z*z6NOa3VSu0zp6*$@)$osolF!PkJL4VfV?g!g;OfAN0;Z&+ON0;GXJje`(!MeXdry zvIJV%h%m=q(Vuh)DFQ!%x|1KqlEbk|`qu=YmMB_P|c`xk~ zq)#d~frA~I<^44fiuEjF{XXwUoxAYNk&F!_L9?Lp6dJ_nR;Z+>h(}p#ZRf0g24E8j z?IUvot$c8Z%Gr;>JA5LuLoy4`D^K$yrB`C zNDrjf7EKTQtk~M6KeaH|frR#Y*7JQ6ZXTzU>gY$gZMXeMZbi^_04Cx!pe<^lFtHV~ zl`?p*A7N6m>VLGNHG4LpKGviZa4E}Xe{Lj6r`*>B*Ue$KPZbZT6Yd3z2Ge(cTwQ#Q z5A&$;+UFF`GcoHpUwO}c`^kU(FP}U+C6nk*3zlr(x=cl?f|?N=+!nD_vF*LUjg2j| zIh77SbTn#KgT{nCm9{>_zBtBG23sNMeHyKNPNh`s0e{o=8y-Q*>vrGiJJsrz--+%V z_?oJ^q}a0*?53M-Qwr^5dM1W9z5y+c3F#~a9pkb0BM%xO+Uj)?Zi6ap64QW3;}QAl zz=1StT0l332K4KG7^K+JG`UQ)Au(8Nx_h|C(6byk|U1n%ml7X0?U6(#55(zlMBX|7Jv#+=98dEH^sPHB@c89AbXLr2g zvcO#KXuCXp^{f&IKtHB{D{ootb&hp7kuxqr+iE3-5Q3J3p|5$a&WlW4T68nn1Ht8{&l#HWqOmw?pWYRY$-720(0E$wkeCM6A3i3EMq?Qf9M(eMY4Qu5BPp+YU@ict z3V$>m2TDtDsO|H(FwMHS>+igtWRq7E6GVoh?WlfMnn6^nt0v_Q9p6AYDc_m}=(EF- zivtA=Ylh}}i#j2Q-U{tWwmGU{c}?kNrOHv>_(Dp?ROOq7?$BJNr;f4u3Oc9|%LkMp z?S2S4s0NwQjD!*{rXj*q%(l9~E}FbUfPeO}(S9fWFr=8oe5d^Y9#cOE#vomX6u_xQ z!9C1zB6X9-6Q(i8Y6EQxh6;$2sT>?2pgoZFSKK+?4i(_j#>S{F=y*_!aKteOx;hHS zp=P0?;z~_2kKaL$3C+O}TD7I&G<729VIzem3Y5ObB>_;;ac+k)M&=-YiCn;b8Gplb z4ER!~JYlk~V1W;0-{swyK*3J&Ib9&@=(KFE3AB+RSs!58AYo&=AEXo@r+hsDIpQ8h z_CsSs4&(zg7ZMEz)wWL01@!Wy1b>DS*?xB#H)~f)$*PiGvnp6Zz*&@q=jX1s(}B*J z$}YNU8_v+}b{a#P5J&#Z>8f}jntvUf5HX^pLd@fSo|Q-npo_Q6(NiEO3Jwg75wF>+ zXII81dQp@H)OFcryWs7F#Byz#lI$Tmd#5m(31-UJ4qn4vT;s-1rgUchL#{%Kmcq!7 z3@$JQz)IH4GmQ_??D-vn0jFD2w4i$0Fz3Bnfj@4qr;XkelKMCGuxT!@`+vzA(n_NT z!cMK~L}s51DNSwH&7B;cyd_$7WE%cz{g%^z)gywI<;+_w1Q)8ec)D!Qvi^$&AS%2Y z&~<21K!*aqKE0s06roFJi+VNX2=`x<5|XB=l@=nmwCX=uZm+bzItnsD{Zx|A|1M~l z^uc~z%Rm5g&eBWG5j-1wQhx!VPGi)=OqW=?SJPt-gbf@}$0?|xKVgwT1BM^|^5OTF zo0i#U9OJEFRl{h9bRRDY&hHK#A)3P(v3 z3+=a!Al*f8MImIyUJro92nW#wKlIkqGXe%M58h|gc^GfXIGz?SSAUamruh6ih4=Ja zOr_Mr!Z?U2wc&7Bi{pOKu3>X3+V7`T$SMU;qB0Y)w5euErZ{PYrpA^Car+A6*aj8s ze3+ef;(WZ{iyWI+*E|)I8lk;usr&ol&=6FobWn!U=I_W*$Z6oh>zfe!3F%T}`hp>g zQOhA&HnnTL)@dc)>wn*FfN5-|HyqNGTSwanZY&cgAccoOj2$ks1&IIRPI)499%?g% zG=##Dh1)VILB8f?w)lRB)Hu#i%x^^s&Q)wohJ;btI>n(q-vN$#E!94tnvP3w?lT&Q zEP?XP%fl&ivk6il){PR6a`cLLg4U87qT?v8rs#k$+_URFLVw_O8i;+8)6O#yn*wU- z_F@%Ej}E@Udj*zAsa?%}&7O+?S|`~BwuY^k*%4+=!uVw6LX<=qm1N42%Lx|l;iL7O z&NgZO>-nVFfm*gbPPaS6-C$-5=j>>>X17DL#34j2e_0RKLo=mJ5#ky8yFp!lXLvNM zZ~UEGF&M>V$bY87*Y$P`wss16bf2(2R7nY92mlbp<2$OY{FMkQ)TdMI)Q&gq!;85EqV>z-!gG-2Pd9?~wNFkrLSW&sQo zS3xdiW25t;*IoMcxXf!++5ts3UVRXrKD9e~t@{n8B!5WsQ*64QB8VkruS^d`MJEpbW*R7s$8?S7%$U;-JWPqy{Tc}xl4}HdmwYjL%x8@XHsqH8hS@~O?RCsu za9bwjLl)mM$Z%3!bm0Lu*fp_XuLG}RGTXmsexpX zsbII$lYdPTyMEGUlju(uL@p>%4($?55|dnIhyg_qQCaAuow?O?^mS z8&zU8-WA&5I&zUHg7RCf>Bmd9AS;e&^mWqn`m2fOW4pD-WrlwS{S4VGKC?RJ4}mV9 zUP5YpL4y%u{Ifffqxa%qG6fBl=F;@9aMaONIe$uOPa{vjOOOpn=Rly!nSDZ&kedk& zvG8DeLvhuOkEXA}#Ir8%dwvEsNO!aCuNpHM--r2?Ptd|-Ut?4`I+HcFO>2@&KNNDR zI_Z#C_f_QrICu(f>wuMQ0B7WN9aRpb-jlYi7L02bhLNYfH>coKWdU+w$Ktrl=BNjz3c1Ns6(Y#k z*P>zELE!x1Uni@h(>65CIyQ7o8l&x?wtqOn{91i4X|m8B`8uXQJm~gu0=63eG5+IB zmkr9V(~Ju(Z2VS_8J4*NKDZ2latzVgF+QYxUUTAl6)C-{Jx>Y%e3Yj**o!KefCW}e zkaX)-Dg|$n)w-3eQNnzoO%Z8s&if}_lfUZsLtK_tN{yOqbzF~fnb2-E8!=_5zJFml zJgS>tTx@o4!fI7!ByO^1O^iB1jcH?atL95N2C=%kp*-5KS79ytO{Q7OB~PKL{Pk6f zZjWlbN1cF#9!*(l5@pm) zP2q(b9OBg}!jBH%DiD=JFb*~pvVUBm5kX3zslj4Cl~TgA*E=%sC8jrb6!k`1U5NiM zKt%1n$a;t*(b=Dbh{}EzP}50mlMlC3e@=afB3Z%xb-3uT$o+~!F&K-D8D)`;zr0h9 zUW}K9&0=q$m+FxILx_7k<7)xwcpwL}N5v#Uj}j$FM}_aZtqW&M@kanepnn!S8|l8j zIhIqQ|F_h!w;Xo$(!F-AS-9b__z^8#Ip2Qjq_Us#JB!qLb0fCiKjn7ALn2*|n)|A~ zo(9cWeoB}yHN151pOy(GLC|?oIlZe2LRXOedzX)3Q1aQ|TJn|;g;`+myO(a61njO| zcJm z^_1eh|0b+Kh9}jqQJ`_1AuUlrcUC1@{js4c3mOA)(-t_y82{}^w!Yy_EpQLChb2U5 z>^{BMNT>@$dF;Sms0v`Erlg2IqfCKY8r+gvswi_yi2pnGueZtnKhZ4yFY{(G z_qpXaV0!{`eM$-C-+#uWBM5FIlRT!l9dB}U)q`ZlafGN1P7P?deuIwp7BjS7eLt4N@p`xFgkQSv3RX2K}%Oxlq++{3y zv_69j$f9C?++F-r+iFwv#0gvdmHd(ioo-NE1<9AOCtV|_)W}?(y?*9IBj0x@{&SS1 zS+J@gm?wuGkAG66)t8R@DF-!AYdsx23;xrAv*0IBIt#M&T(H@TQg$kHm&(eE=1q#J zKd)4?_42n}J3dR50j5M}W5BOe+sI|9Kkz%RHt(1ZRAH1Ih>1HcmJhm(0S_pz+wykv_^P}+l+*rKLYElW2lSs@E|6)2Et_b(s^mBAlfZNCrH&Hla0C|`rBL`1{J@Pt}>N+HtOr~wh;lK9_i5xM}nF!}ST~wPP{Sbm_-u>E34&) zhOFQHQKNysjt>Y`EL6gc2ezWeCkANqKvzO#8N)S?!?H4a))=KF0Dp!#;i)AVz<3Y}hE+ZpR~%1m!WBlDsX@onJpyCEIN>cUr9Ga;95vPAIeTR0R2m3+r@XV|31e_)4=yfR)h?fQciVX1r|zT2Wg+ixC79n zUUS0<2c7F>>Vj=YrE$2>eV+=TaC*g;R)MOqyP6!A@`{V3QBK(GNR0qo!1~wl(34={ z+$swV*@^rt)bY<7H-Ava-Qf1-onXLne^^zm)oq_ov==OZn51oMy^};Q*K69wW*ew( zpM9B3BYjgAP@0RVWyeUKTEW^*=4M= zW7T(`0!Ado4-lsp!Qz?rgW25CP4sl#Hv?78y-k)IMKENk56kij&kyHg7LAEQ%$Zn8 z!$RCziY4brlX)d}9v$Nb&RIJ%d=2AT$&0KE$p{XW)3p>^A*Z_Yy{wILy4(9DrOU=< zr+RtegcqadE`LMR0AbsM-Y1zPj0f)|eF_`P7-huFUmR8)b}r==99zXL-uPRZe6!teJHL0`?C2p%N)JJ`Yu5)n z`0RHtkGsI(R>W>y>O89_n0Xltyf*#}-8h9;Wf zzJs&_w1{Qf$?5|WUi*rZ>PV-(Lmaa#V`glH=o7gH?Ab&1IsH@Z zr-MFF=uUl}@43uDm6N#@o@#{4vd1;W+2j$#s z0@2l|-yz1Q+B>8^UAH%If3?gCn4R=(+aYKm<|vQ{?bN==iBu)hOw1TufI)CM= zOlNxFO52YESgUjj#;-DM_mnhMf)@e-kKJUM>`!hNcprv}@7jAp#7xhTmR#4Ap^ao>)2=9bEF_G-q$z4-iQ%2Da&E@#!&(N@|`N98NK1aGykyGLyLPLxhZtCZ zhM$5}pKwxttl7&I{fpjB_x^+$m%lqET`Jkim&X~gH+0Yo)NZS~d z&caoxy`1=&ZN^8z2|HW~rGHZD`6rL1iu}wLSPraDsL5W?!$BpeQqFQ&$UvzV#=15= zkc~058uPt3jj^G>Zs1+dv-4yd|L_-+?qj{YQl7t~d;wdjeHXj9iqUcG*EEV7^}w61 z_R=rX{s~;M7ce| zlKn>8GUD`#S59B@P%`O`5m1s2+O(?ml*f+g?&zT4qu+kSUtGe;bvYaK#T`@{WF zi*-ZnPS&^Nk~2WmfgFJ%A#xG*54Cy9s>@d^WsqD?4Z=uTEDuy|MOc-$(@Uz1SASR= z(*qlgT-=^FH>+2D`hRiTrhELV24p#{7gnU&F$|VLM^&W*CGTB?FZcwHsr>T!W6m$i z`$R5SPW|;?ozikjor#MO5>Do$B#; zob^alUOAmah2ZMF);Knkvog1KbvBTy^3fg;HNSG~l>NpSHB3a#zp!gII<^*aaP*ZI zbI^KHk|0EiZzQ37jXtt`A9Q5*EH2Ym7J*=j{h3IEM6$FXMpYdUWSi)JH{Iy(?^}$s-jZQGTPnP0R=eW zl6&~a75p97@IBy4Vr+UXH%8~1M##ib1C5w(_S)9QQWH#2DvqwmIpI}Cr|WC=5G+E> zNQ)u19L3@kIbd{Ahgmd^gBK>dL%2nKqdJl443bZDlYau+ggZ3jcc4PrTU1tG*^wti zkr}dIfpW5I`LWSWyun~q$9AptMdXEQz1@cUsD~N6T!d+dv^?2a(ve)cPE=vHNt){R z=HnRco*i=SE}K~8ox$x!Y$>lQEPOn%@Vl|a%~{+o!eG zpNs^yn12Fens2tjp)c>YmG+b?ABHDJMZh(?z=zLw3g2xm%n!I^d6-+ z*7Utfa%4HBl1Yt-L}^5GdI+s%DwxyiE(C~>#4j@{?I7QSjen>qQ5obSH&_JfBKe{E zGgqs8+Rf1wY=w*}Av;zq74D_T_B6#>L)5LIntzJ9Q_WgL-c)rXEeZn-LHeh#Md!L1 zV1>kQw55*TF8ut0C)q97bc9E%deFMRgsjbtP5(w@az=wtRkNLadHttCB(Il-7Dc)VHd8u2$9muc#TZ2k6>ea&MfANme#rMTO%WCLh} zOb{jfOgj{Eh7q;!rw)amX15fD7)fj8a4|-RB6{2@d(&~eNUVb;i9$vn=!cuS(}b=v zmX2;xmnG6y+No@`pOAFJvvwi2hC?eqV}B_#*d^itXWzh#Ai0a9TS8H%N`z{}5>kOP zBl0@&VFyGC$Em{JNkG;IiN6eXx{|6weQMASXEUtZwMBJWWfT?lnb+W#qJX3sq>5g8 zYa#m-9E=@k^V)A@oBeH@!k9E7nk=A*FsIUj-bTw&$B{)IXqqz2kV;GZaUd1uL4V4b z5`#y)tp?*Kyy^b!T{eNCGV`#v(OYrVWD{7s#G<8T)~sV}A?u%$=setM=LuImmg%sK z8NgBi2yhfY$+RVh+>Em~916x0GalyJd!O{f>hkg%oVK#dY{s*$@g9>%)^+2J6771L!4@b_9!?N{|(x**d%gn#ihjyS(ao-LmW>q_UE=Uh%XX?Q^*u6A=m^qci7 z5ic!LnrJ9Tu}y4MMTCc?4Cf9yCIzUn=E8yKT*Zix;8PrQhdHWq zuCiM9_)Ji`eAxJL4_1cj9#AN_FYM6nSUerr== z17>T-|Nhiq$5-#bfIqRSUp@UiogrXV{Eexnp|@oZ+&5ZGssWr0kt*Xc5Oh zSuJToj#-Abt+t_~?>(bGX9XStCN z|D@fbSsMAI+sUCVLA?gV&=}f4_PbP6=$_}G=fK>m=zsKmgsb3hsa=&WV{FGf zeIeK&KZkP~--=#mXt!!+C!;fM7>>(^;i6nko0fN6wml&P6e=Ft8(8?T3eJD90W{AH z+(q+SB>_!JSKekDf`zQbc61H3;+W#RNr4X3OxPEx?nk%`UiCL!TE_SN<@ErWA_i%EMVX z=x+$K;|4FtoOoKNhGNV@$kYwF#+gg!SMIYWFvqHdnpLG#e!$Ut6<4Ut{{Wc7=(!Qk z!TRqgGM0@Y`J+^7uqBH>*8)#n0PG`RPKNf8Qr8aptAEJ7Vwf6GSlLH-lof@X7MD5$ zb!QKN65E|R4E=QVr45q=-hNegRNlg`zRG{Eb}_!fx3QwFhd~*`#oyp+>-?1vN0~mS zuUbAWPe;b6pVX(XFV5dgOQj^Xos-2He)@!+{7TzoXKI4YHND5_O51fW1G57|gDO~6 zR&G#s`hNlGRCGi(0p;br5gv85+Ix$H)H3t=?vL3PgEInc3Qz(F1xX_~cDV#b-g9xS zi5+z%gRfM969F)-lK$%{PuX;s1VTXvxbEJkb`zNxs`E@MqyJVZ+XE&51TOJHPHJd3+oYYgDzEJ1yI~heSyPszCzi9?G zhIU8WmBUsF?FE&MGk*^a8*wtML_)*IJ3&^T$w95@A;?$rInR8)k%|;mW7P3Y$WFK| z^*zeru*A76i2#ESl@-#lloD^2Ga+ge5r1!ClXq44>ck^$97C!Uo!o$=QX|sHavAkk zgAA8SoL-fGF8Yavvl!&NZCuk*(Yinq`LNuc3p#^bzBf8zD@c>bZGt%I$;n)I+gboy zK%~EXpp;>PhjuATssV!H&n^eGZfp$VrCEx-oK!4Ac%>o?`?=v!2`yt3X3AE^Gb=$Gp;TO3iLvIrj-Fge+haBs9fBwE6aVi$jr z&MGM*KMD_<4|*7^8RKBGT*gyfDT}jtZ0vs&M(I)DafrQW2);*6tY8c~ldJp`+h@yu znLov4hqA}I)^UZaP8io|*6I=XUU-pBrK~R{NkN0|5vayLFILoFd;nII9$imoMQLLt zP+cUy4Co7aufT`0o4;{tth~SpcVAk_rnPy9`xL1_>;L%YX%0h^#sL@(5&Rk24Rn8n z9pD8h&t*4AI+fM@J?$R2Qh^>M$|w@@i>nMMwbwa~CM-cvT0@}zXkNMsg;(PF$~f$< zTtaj|D54u+aE#~`j$`TkZN0m5@7~C+GUC4y zbghg9S6BrO>CQw?rSKGLY}?GOqL+W*p3>x%`whIQZNanUIq?kTtWVP(d!NCjb(KVE+o(E?=lxZu2@r~$<6JsJk4mu;4;m2dnk4+ zce^Ruhb6)84G?J9tywigSzY_^GS&lEDSOHN2?q?m>Y{k^R z3!<^Mmnq8*i_4xgd%T1Ld~mXj(d$*aG|yLGv5gPqh#Fuis}5{2s|q)23I!+MyHr{r zr^x?JgBs&)tI(aJ-g+aY_e(`Fh#U*v%^Q3UnD%BlUbWzJ1epa#8kR||gf3V=e1@NgT%Z4KT03p`yOz4l zk)PoJS3}OiA4$kyfkB-9;EP{=h5g-Y_`tPMV7iGkn(-ly^g_kWcCfr#Dk{aOs2}gJ zv>F?Q1!#;iNK{r9d1HU2^lk1dBfi$1YV*$~ZmE*KYI{eNdJ?nFMFm)*YtfrX9m5`!QQjUJ&D?-N}Wei_#y`4rAsaR~k%v>>b-Hb9u8t1`ZM0)m& z5x@9vzy8YZmadjxeDwvtAhsG{&l+CG;!IvLkn-#D3PXM+%qM?iaDsX&A~JuaB(Oau zN#k3zgyhu9^ccJ%K~b@R#i90%wv4e{1SvyA;>ndxnm-u|@PkxOh6CI@d^2)TqOwhS zglbc}D8q6999Vd;>+;4g4Yw8oxx3dK96sPY_aOt~bIPy(jLk&f157whX&2@&`=ole z4S)a@Qf|pcAZ346d1UoE?UD^(&TB0L5#jEJX~T*MMP{urx1h4mJ}%wfUaVgI{IkEU zR$u(;x9LB>{7U}w>KVZ)Pg=-NxEf^$q-8KcLLlbJ zLQlM*ia&!&TZ>;-6_vwOmmxj(i(mbXW@Z_kE>Ii;>ZN~}w;wgE>*pBLtI-h=Qv^`^ z3U3YjZn%x6z$;ZX*p%!{eSF*FD=RwE4$0D8Pud($Wluci-BZj$PXvk3Oqpz1e2wZr zl9{!tiCgpz3>~yhxj|49i8Yw*&dQ$A2iXml*vJI^!{#TNfhmPkn zTe;X_T33H*_NvgZ0^p>j2nGf{j$wXBXDmhe2qGi3FBciT{(Wm*;QVE}I#b3W=PU`L zY>{H+i|8ZV48If~+O!d7y`iU`79w*;Jn*@;MeGeU4wzKCRtwfpsgTT4)+0LwqqRCT zv%QrmCW^fDiZ_E~EahI2=^+AhjEl;03HFOIxdeZV(F87XFAMdwV23qOM4Xa$z2bW6t>{DVZ@o`U1;5c4DKQ}W%$C7qp^`kF6`ZMYLXLnlZoF=v zAL36`xjM_1`^~Ky9H)aOx0;`{_0%rp{5yY8rMPnoTE)Jt8;;qOi2B3NBC6oon!$OK zR!%3mJ)rR-N3)?jJh?h4zq(Tu^7<;RFu8tZuC&x+2^1T9d*5VUpA=2|(U$DCA)%lU z)+$>d1^Ht=^lxDb?T3frX~+{Q`01(0Gm$_=YGh&rWZzC|L3UIqgoL@7mB!Qa{11Q8 zJ@Mf`T1y6nH53goUc_jX0X72JY`m2U_Dy}a$3g>t9~#ICYiOW^wO3&`kZRr0PG6b{ z`SaDoKblOMBtW#T103bP-$Uyrm&gspoYoF8$Le^>Rs8^i#*s5GU_8jO>Ai7IpKc7c$dLBgYcCkl<*` z=?=BF`KV%v_BUnVGjF+{cbNTEe74JgN};9nFZRtjaunbG5|>Ob7(eg2qF z5Qqw4kB+9xGcKtTw!QJ3YoXnVwUR#X?=(hZVKnK1pGmWm`hQq=U{|jj5Ho-14ZgL> z(Ua&7KRj}DN4+zL1LzE97_4N2Jen3e$`ItXiK{th-CAzqZY4tLAnlN|Qz>#6!#}$F z79y1b<|tQ#;d>PAok1vp9p4in8t`N8c_CP`4rhmOMOv#Ejows85{heVYyks5`*y?ds9hqjyE7;qp@(ZL$HV zpuQ;i$QsO#5~u*WT^FWBj;}Lk9cWedME_lFMg3CKDjnHxn&qJIg|ZenaR(P@wNR*o zMUvTZVz>Dp>C{F&5fp#=!uo~fPP*2+@~&OC*mkoQiAEs>%p}~zwlhP6v6@Rx%hhkp zPlfD^xnWjdCgGCSKzW_{>@c$k5hnu(yYS3B;&~QKAVo>ww%>Tv0aTjXyKJ^jRa;^1!b*J zW^L!*Aiq6-7Ih{1TSb}gs=vX{G-u1fA)`oel3qaU`(xMs?k3e$u;syupz z1}zi{_}&_|SY*>%_1DnLYUk{(JUW^K1mFs#7khd%HI+!XZLU8=5@&4S_iD(0+?14` zJeHF3D${a5kX4V`)G7(tMJ~}+e)#vUS@@;}k#6`XaTR|;t`Hu`-DrdZ=6vUF%+`;& z&Vl~?0r+FC;~$-Wz)Ki~w|bv8t?Hc|cMVb+IXSB`^qIsUyfqpK(V4kUt?YNT(E9}) z8z>F3TNN{TPfzJ+-Dre$b9_9cLK3j?(W5jor(*9$28g3u`eCNJb1OzYhsotA~Wdboj%3}Pm6RW1`KA|cYEy}aAj5b`({ zEdvW*N+V zFou7R?${PK%8~qTZ>4CK$G|-QIRtDDUl3pZN}SOSni(R|s)87dGJ(=dl-0JIJkq?$ z-`=$3*g`e9!zHzla0`|2aZSMtwuC60ov!L+&9)G3m&R)xwbiP2OEE>~J#Cve`V+^q z!h%f8L^)1^U>*?jrTmh3+n86A$ao**03&~vjKmu`mv@`lN=&Jg8K|gCm!vh@v~yQ3 zpEn0YA;l+$=pwQl&VGnTuPzmvkd?C|N`)mN`%dAB^7$REVVu^7Z?}{F^Cq1g8+Z6i zcNLx0QY{s#EQ{`IRcNhJumco6ePI>kstq(E++o<$Z3%X~HW|W=wxixtn*#Csouz}?SV*$*ydr(W1iSN{`5Ww4@u_5UK zG|RCO@}d+DJMxT3B7F75IQ(;q_coeT3AVM_s~#c#TraK!rmb$cwYocY+m)_B-g1+= z>e>`Q&ph8y0)SPwY?vseGE;x!hJ01P)&$Z$?vMb<$8eI-#hr1q4G&UoT$h5?#r~XA15=b?eO@w6k zGAcW+Et++rqeDDFPf@WJ&F2|WOCfPqH(1sIlPKmkzn@MRmjaSo!kE z)pNnBT#@GVHb5Xk3KM>1Y|^q&ui1~79(IL~xjKq?zqW(!$(*pFt5lx9rumxlVDhg_Ov}kGuN;& zDnM!q$Nb04c6#V(|Gd8*>nKR}v`6j;pI#wni$LAoARHA@xNSm!#`mG zm_;mxscI_cRPXz5Z&PqT9Jsb}g^=at%X-OsrPsO!T=2A^6R=|wC>WYi3-QeO1fPGF z9Y0c^f7$}rwW@!G3?lITAGUCrx5Vazw%MvfqUxuiW0Q?|>4h}<4zF@Dxo@UO+LA{( zDgYw1aZ;h%0#(%;t=#2tf=K!&_&DF9!Pk;!DK(`)XhunhpY}AruE!f_Du#$Y-K7Wh zzEK?=m)&vhDCsGqy5Gs;q}K;CRoSMYx-OMsI5SQg632gqVqOph;sqSF@Ra}7-XK{# zBH*0AM+^i-7Xf}#+lkIXvrI}BfGqrnn#EZ-^#NGC=~Nx}(MN%Y0n$)TQq<|Qz%rR- zpnhTiJ;f2q>TejDJWJ7_VLhRmDyAZ|hTp&iw=v00dL32__wpZH0}zj16=#!*uL!l# z^+V#pylQ`Fvjc4P8vDOm53LF)^t9`Z%EZ~!EevKt(*pq`&#(K|f1-0c99S$KWfNS$ z6~SRzQgx*#p>UZveVR^=pQ;bdpQax$fI8#Cw;M-`A8MQEGDpxiC;r z(B8Lu8;kxtXt3%c)TK&@S9VF?qP>EWA8LvcizI)iw_j8DQ$9?a#mtTRVal)U8@GqI zU-G7@q88h|=~{92LktFW%vYd9!BSvg2BS;;yNqJ{)`3VOz$Ru(80!H^8Oxmx6)fY_}I)zH?kJ7VICL{#y}re$_^Z_h}Vm~ ziEDp_?Ri7gVA-yFuYtk_rY41PG@yNJT~kRx(<9!e?YFh`KAl8LqCo^H6V&3(MMSL> zIGCHflZim4Uy?q?*j_D;e?o6qs3<}#XEKBoMow4!hY3Tn{;_sY9L-^^^|@u`Ne$ZM zi;6_qQ84LxJMvU2(T~4fhB<9p31R0wKy82L^sU;nZw0D}J%LfWN>3Q}fxZR+K3wV1 z#4cRghTpqUMe}|u^nBVC1R#u>R{&k@T0*OaJmIBI+QPUS%1L57|CV=+135jZ=;N#6 zyI7elI>{j$`ujgFj5X}gQ?mtcSEa%mL>?j6z$Oe{+IT$q$drtlVqkiy7G7%ui#30J z9+R&U0lE@MM&6&(_WJXm)l?Pd_x>}2OQ`h6EY2>Cb1BZ3Ea_#kUBxt<$;8RYcbOMh zQOH@f#}Bw@b}ff*2xEN+_Y( z$pno-iDoM==iO@x@O|&bJFM#qc<{9%NY8Ry?z|7S-- zDa4G(dhQy#%MMOOE@*${b#AsyMSWAAL#Prwd6v|8>E`x8XU8rgJM_%)JL_tDlB}aA zNH!_6h&b~>#OkC?qHDAyIQGM=FRY~i5$SdkoPv7cN`|irK$QqEVdF-ENXq^wJ{1;M zf%8x#5w&qyA# z>ZKQW*p0R+z-f`PdPK6|Hyt-ly8fb!AVb@$uD!{6?Jv=>KAmd*s#i{)qm7PXMe|+u z7keZW_L1rF=MQ3+%17%m5FGC0-#G$b*OO?MU=Z;Uqm_Ri)Q*#r-k!ztz!s{_Pk#OL zYL!uZRo7otj#zD|EeGP)*hxU}9L{~eCcHrf~&AcAV#X~|u2j$TX4 zIx6Jff1CFD!Qqt=Mj`Xc5V~k%^0+UYf?91Fsnh(F)`i+}bXpMdnQT|JllRUovh78B z97GA&FKB;4x)NEzDZ5jkp&qgNFO5`Bou$02^m|dSJ!#u)yLwUh)?T)Zq>|8-sX~Z1 zk8B*qfZV}MQ~emirEt>8!doc6g&AE2g%i&NKIa96+X0dW9#+a#XK#EB=4=bn}d(7nph3BBqH4t4v}qY_R?@ zV_F`%TVpsfcLSVN7LrU4uIe5MC@S?1 z(-@*=U8ugXUtxzygvX|t1GFG-B2%dq4K0|}sIx3v%%R+g3i#LgRzE;VL#=n+EYgJ` zKB|3hfiGW3eT1vbgrr9HFSRWil>t=j2cmzflA?<-{3p0*f3=2UK56N;{dKoA-to@M zLX~_Uo5MXuQahi-f>V&AObGpr8*~{&drUt&0;GCR(A{9{p<9-)jmtM`clWE_I~QpB zJQ*h_x6ehV^T)cSB8vdtw(o!U-{b(1sQ>-%{yW9Rq%W@AAGY)nsqcy*CI^>6bJ>4M zr049|WDhK317l3vEgUf~07c1ZwxIWaYb|1dT4-vWy(~6wWmrKYNt;G|_ivk8vSvw> z_uyP{)b!n-Dtlc{;yn}|l!Z#&=ZWu0Z~ZrjvZYc8@2S1pm|xG_IP04Y_kWt@6S764 z^rliOs{M7R2nd8nMd&Q7Ak}JC4eft%fD9kz9!8LK+OGKasj`8(;GXKI-gNZFj1rRc ziYwPTNPS-~s)}N+`&d0VfB8vZ3)`6mRxvoD|97&*$h1L%TxM48QHOwSa|*NQVV4{Unno#0z1;* z!-Q_v);Ikie*$ zIP|gB5P>l>8*7!nY=r@7iwA!|E#vEY@NMc1L|T0r;V)mOQz6w6>3kSf)e=!e!SLDf z&SG6jArAw;u@UBTb1ZX>F^T$07%PKK+HdAjfgW4?y?`x*E&+c)*r6$r!ZEr1 zjw{}uM(T`|Aq8^#&E}W*aWQ$Yc|cRB&jvjs)gE}9f?RrT z>C{~IPYDMmb+ApLeYt-YzjdTMs)QNLog|rocID#kPA?sr-(q(7wUD>5qN`%Uu6wh{a42Vncjaj69=g)2qx0vRcGa; zZe>K;;CL{NpD;L{$CICv(@gU^h;fSoXq=3v)27j}kiOG{xO!I*Fz!)5?erhG>_0BB z<=;ORZ26PG?s+B+M)oYGl3SJPav@QSqnvc}=SU?bHcx_i0EDJq8yOSFU5{-7^0ZK;1KR8baEyAL2x!2w%+QbYT% z7@`G%M|vMO%I=ouJKTXkAAe^0=jtnOKi2+3kS0=B5!1}f`2ksEAWMStzov#c%*=eo z`V;*I2KCm4Z+^XD1U z;9n4s#A<(HMN8X?T7{;fQhf>*=kf^(zDIli3Gr~Hf;ps5v!|O6#maawV9+W2PROR4>6W2!n3ld23ZW?))U zDibt5>qk8PXAs6lXRV4dr7t#MVZW;SNcIBH9o55-bE^WRvc5$vB|S=LufB8zqNY#G zrthFX_wx77@sd#kDmFoM&Q8S#5<7uxwU`-pRnDu3HjY%`DQ_=HVZbWz?Pp^vgUpmb zW$S;7h2O;Co|`iJfg&W0cUc*+9hj1-_G$CTY)2f6S`>O|orpgxkP)#}Es^Xeg1Tf_ zO%Ll*$>!nyyU;XrL|shU#wglQ2tS6eW}v*&cx`PThjEDZCe*BjbAVd#G5~?(VHcDy2?jb!NHeVb*`LsLY?G6T=}YfT zmLrHx8Sc5k%z@Msx7xE5F%!&z+iPiKF-J#~8VSCMpzfe5q*`oRqB4t4tFk39cq^T* zJnJm-mkA&o7yL!W<6AHDdfdD!Dw~#^Orklim0|$$2nuN}uV|n%ZNz`T zTl8s8m}9}U^zbgDh}VQ{MbDDKGgFXk+>oA?wK-4euY0e9`qxZZb5S#4+%VqAB=lFk zj@6WFj=omF^h*NuaU(tB!u@rKo>BTyjzT==V68NeQ1xCqOPg2esMKf;V9d5Xbb_%& z=~9l37^JGWe!R_M4Vu9*38BroqhfzYI#BF@paNmwC&&W2=~Ws0<27cExBO>ZCt?IA zg-m^dXMww`ppdlk+V^y2se5B;_`dvl8SlcAYkOy!3UC%@0NsKbn-;2Y5EAut$b1_2 z>>psBJbBT1&4z|cQIx*wiUy-pRhw3(DvxpBc7``LE52LBYrISErXZfa^8$Zsi*Kfy z-u^^jBhpX?AhbB-yq?u^5PGn<{7KyJuN-lmmQ(9G@r48XEA^0<_D`k4ozJ28IHXS!wRIMCdQj&?_63?oDRxK|Cn9?yqQZYULy9hgeLIq? z4?~tcRrH7E-cGa*fDS&R&d`6Fi$jYmYvkv{L1~jc083d_=AZ->k4*CBJ$bq4wJgKpz0wRb$ z+(76roq(Mc(SpxH5B91Pi$d0a8DX#z=DDWgmU8dJ)X>n)Aj8s2Rd2*+CocfECkUv^ z-xxybogob*$MY9l8BDoT&3f4$RVP#3A@lZip4J{WM|oWog5Q7SF9>?P_?YgrU7!FA zwhA_?<`>6z2CT%1SbVzSp4f2-4R_hRq7o1jG)oe^JC590Z-OA%<{^E$NDsjvuKYV< zkFAm|KDlTrnq~JGquVjk$wwHYT$}5TPwl704!|tp@IW`j!?6yR(|wYXKw75lLv4g} zp5zKn)orik*tLIvqE+0_XL(0^)`DaKSBq{m6MGy%KuQDeNo9JCW*>fcEJMTONSVv& zxg0R)s_ZAB870NG5uDein<)^(J;&P6kni9KC|A9v1n4q;)p5tlrjAF4Yf*-qiUcI^ zIAYDhZ~|{_P0rCpH|&IHX65(y5pZLQi)T&(?M&rib9;aPO^4tk=h2Y{VdGYr?qi%E zaXvFr7I@HBWY8s*=11_N;Onx_5q|~6>3=oQpxx9ffKvEYl^{Yl|8NdbUq&^ zg8VX9t+Ice@hZmBROKiq)0E+nzj;D9HL3-kae0Z8?8%+AGU!6$lCDXOsWSW{xOT@~$mIY=9k3P3h@Be4(V;;n&(?#ryfKOd zZU6x>_UcQrI~tFfj1|==_|>Q#@fmZzNavCemU0vIPj~RoN;v2@4;Ug+hE+Uw1Hges zjs5hXI;!+FwLeqv<5drPSDbzaXl5?bJOBcuxcxMwLAxPJ)d~D3RuD))R z$i)p~*wz9)gHjl;x!((U89MK=e1TQxs=R;S3+&}DOBbwRP&oC#g$FtQXFio?+R&J5 zdB6?##!I8ys-?%$m*Z)a?M*#zGMLLMS&7rDjN|j;aE=bLz*bEgFZ1-gn4VJHeOw^D z|MWZ{y=Rd`G&EX@aEET#U+KgK%SeD6S@m-QMv@H-?{E1GGV~eF7vSC^>3fPt_j7+v z<{1=I0xfM2Q!l1FS5t8bdmp-5?I?G+g}YBjl$`VkvjVfGga(19-AQ{V;dKA0k|5sQC|`Nfgw zfYd*XRGJe%D251@mW?S*Ri82;C9!|l&0li4i}WaMv>TfRSx!jD=IB;knHFHKLe$cQ znO=dLVbsE(uQDU>(`1t#BG}j3BwfFobGx;4@PbW*k6%slac|| zpCIqhMiODK(IQ2f%qR+Nup_w}lJv3{y+dSGm1USOnTj zkW{{R$nH9)X4M%vCFi$2Wb;JGhKPLP)GpLOuU3w_Cng4GpmziyE8E#Tag%|FM{}*! z>DYE0$H)Rp%D|1+(<3Z-kK-q-1Y&vW{+cPb+SfPiwujK#(mETE0R4ZL?o9|*IK?rQ z#s!=v9gz|UNppG3b9ZY(z$VqZj-}uJ1 z0|(D)d0+P3z0lIWsx%MhBL#MiouwB_`U^_D*xb~#w6%7)5Qdpxt$xZL*6N2&{l|~hOyblA9~&56 zZDhLNQcTnx02)hgBYDp(RNVeyE67+=s?E7E>-&?5v7a#pg{yxejMdXItKWrYyX;WD z*UN>ewJgRerj(@n)xS{36ZmDN7+EtS(5%_3x`va1frC#q$+vgEYxseVsE=0Oh^u)eSD`^XWrNo;QYNqxg z{7mv85BO+I7Ds;oeIo0FxopRg6;AkD$cN~#D#rosiS`5rJu$gH(~bUx)-l`R!geQa zQMljr2Jn}f?ew6SWE)+ZdzJsBY|!a_;t+X?Rl2CnH7fx!0#!9}RM|uj*~bxS<*;Nd ztCILWi5vYDOGE(lttc$-^3lH5CLoRvApS@*0Dj_XMlQULeN@*im zWVY?Nst{3|-T!I+G;VLGyXC7D@V;=LL$OaivUaj|hdT(DC|@tvtW+tp!e$~;!1RDJ z;zS1oQT2U<`S(uRTH9_=?*T2OHP}f8vj2d6Y2#4!I}X_y)tL$NXi3x;(>EkEXxER-la;LDJH8Xhz~& zKI!NC=vY{S{D@+ImYePkZ$w36@Gzt_nBIS?bBWUu#(kg0gTOt1Tw=hH&@)A~yG?yD zU$h;SdH{Hd#RfW;<2slgcP{)VGB4V@byF?9j^}tNj{?kW%V8x@!{+wz&^-MN&`qS_EbD10s84H4$U0MlR+W#3GCbTSd5WfrXZcv1jTc{3mjbV$> zmf5$E2@)`njZrRRIjWc%109;0g+W(qQ-eJ>U*t(?s)&EH1aw%N*e!=#C4ibyH|!j_hkHBr#OY85Raj;)vg8~SX#dTKZO zhqaunQK4GRRdh?=lC}_7SOoy-V_8we^Y)9NL3kp(@(W)HYS)J$Esb5X4l@)q=5vE0YB_K#_DnRPK4IVdos* z^0-_6bVHG8E><_XczRVY*qSl8v%mm5IH+y{dDNsK7VT}4?8fJv)d9Rg4cJL4bd^>`B|qeP9X^ z)1~L}E&wk9=Ld5Cf5*4{xjb^8<&1-7#=^*IZw#G355YL|a%F^ZN|Ugww|UJU zM6Kk6argOl@mDQR{C-nA3WWBq zY)@5k_R<^8kE4LH2*`h|ULfwkGd1lZBsFhK5P7T)Cbdm3sAzK4SKY8pUvL^agbtl_ z$X;d^J%y)PnWjcmD4`j>X&CTEs1te6e<-yMxY_MQZDzxrQ*u~E{UEe$K=r*m3Cm7# z^Czw6N+e?e*sBznBkegE|EM01D-`pe%E4*o0C#h|oGfywYo~vVkRZ}w3VL=gkrx67 zJQ+Bfg$0~j>}l!#9O!sK+LP?Wp*4w8h|$%;r$q{t!OCDD>wBP#aFrh2{r|K#*?hny ztD`-+z$D-DL>m$HQ%PB@|EbU=^dTxFp&dP$GH&B$YB5W23Em=!m&yBJ?+C?y0B+7ODPm8MKjz$=LR5ca(bq$@ z2uKR#u!>Ur>t|IaF!HM2P!rFcC_ZU_%5tBbGPy+znp=Not{(VxRAC?feWio{@KRlm z&cFM>(fPN}a&-RFLj*K8gIAxS~2~9MJfdD`OkUk zvD#URZ)v|3IA-aOrju9xgky*0w_5oO?X%)I)$f0y#9B+l1YXzRJ3~xF5>a}Q0k>@S zB9p|BNgYPctN$W!^j#B|aD6^`$CIq*W4jUjk+uRwTI#{WFkiWV-^2z0eQ`qZS&SpUeO=3m0e*g)^NT}%t zZJ{Z#wg*=kX)w0`|8&+^n)IBf4U|;FDpK6As@@v_jbeCBO0Q)39(j?cAvH`5m@&xa@|XQw5^*Rr`e1xWY= z=|jJ4jAXsZX7Z}2$Ts3$<}byW4`-~jmajVSzU@3iIbQm2btl&FWuZO-0>X7x!(R)_ zNRXh&;qe_hKA|vf6#X92ZsN=b!nc3!1FurPNg0NyjNmtwqy` zvkNo~4Yr%BaiAMEK3<)+?E5ced4o|jWGu64l;QgeLF$_yjyeCB&!b#p-ahM@x}ggqzYu-y&`{}VcQyL zNdzTC-$DI709oI@QDm!E$(?RQiQqm5;-`@$%(7_ji6sDVJB z|G+=0PoFpDKaT!}$ng1@ZW4dRXIBC~RjD1TCxz!ANs9`CxT$rJ1Br7XTN_dHL+XWw z6QNnr6)v4--LQ<(us@Ad3v9vB8$r7~>>}ns4fK?kofSJ&XvAU3Z(}TuaYjwRa!*-Y zt9uBwV`@`qDyk<_jv%J%s~ixNr;R{36m4$nF)uJK8UCrfLZD<_{3U;HI&jP#06C_7 z-SmdXh{|eg1U9Z5iS3TCk~YHKbfiLJr}7a`^LU>bs+-;xQLeE>vj?FoEz^APS?EYx z=24z;S=sB{x`?N4&}M9JQY8(Bl=@w#l@h!L*NS*73d*2-sa+|8vq_7V)d&J61$IP} z$JjjJzv7?NRmtw8l4*ZiC?`!gRIXJNt|$$i^zz*1-E}(MZ?SSo*-cD3~#2R z6js(FtR&*WIOSH*q?kIb{tEtYu-aMo5USOAwu)~0C$e;#Y9Hv5LQ{1H!mC+ZOsmgU zs|u?{iew|6Jj0?(cAe^%cGNc5%Feu)QOR!fD>X6Xp?D5co=ux|CGPXe3F)D^H@$e9 zwVG2}=G?vKU8{d@C1$J0!=fiiIzPIhPdmBRt#95YlE$Uu@@g1&S!=zYEK%ML7a_FZ zP723DCraD$o@9RMoa(2OeGVe;w6AMtEKN|>zq(HCpdA;o2s%ycxH5)3SUkd75Aa0A zcZu$Uz??bTl9igyAYUV+T3^}YssgDM{X(bLJhnY}eiVPl|AAclA0K?0*2!~Gz7XJd zZMQrKtNH5>j+jQ4liMhe{^ubYoHP?KnCHxnAg)*ti0dETwkorLG^3oqtF6khh!Xb*>Ebg#O8I||T{zaQamh%j_>d02p5(B>;__> z>s7y1;k(P`(00SDZ0uogshTFVCrjk?OH7Wo;|tkL>celCJ!-nCrAyPR7-HNn3QzXD zMy-Fkvyq*5_^}BURw@~QY5+`#k~Z~C>3>>aJZ%W ziJr@?Y*RfI{S>6i9VW|YrAd|Xt+Xm`AZYJ;X8PCf41+$V6Qjojf3^KmCFn9BS#{Hf zfRnnlraB-i9We2j8uQXHM@d273cHHhc`U?cED01x?e9MsN4u(BES{Vawy1Dj1#< zSx7}_BdHX}NToYZMVhwpV$vP=RM@z247XCB3zNv+$_IZWn78(O9-q%5^ab?n% zJ_qXjl67VbqO?7?#>`1zr{;<_Zqk41H2sBVgS!R0j4ZK&DMsCI!Z*mUB_L;{iGm)e` zZMLvPWL}jQ$7-r%8=1`+$ptmaUbkwJ+GB>L^C=7&7^&DsYAB=h#fd4k?1uFBp_rNL zyV55Ei@0pAYX2&91uC*U*sOn!-Bt6^VDGiqdf5ZWT|Js}lTF`#fOzX9Sd>y`yQ95G z;Nc;fC`+orsHIt4Sa=lv4FMmhJSjwuhT5BqXRQIUd~Imaoc)RJW^`A`Vu*zkYS&hlRr_u>P? z^9RX&G1xx%`+t7iZZwTZ>zr14h;D!sNE&*;rE}*I7taBdNfm@m_~XrQTXOq@t;abxPx+~TRDt&C}nl~ZGPskVBpo2NN+$+QeZ*&=hJSi72M zNU&to$|gUxDqa(sXX=(rPDEN-N*oqcDLZ)xAc_l=@y+&K&y{l14Oe)&8d)IHe*$Q# z=c)SGgK?9d;u(J*o?@eRC$^p!j^$Hi|Ay!ZzhUMVT`->Q+nZNg`kuR#N^UC?^M?(g zC(X)FUO1)4TaJw8cWh(L@H(b&#pxZGNhE%a0VoBR15d3r+w|0BWtD)(pEXy_`y{V` z7!r=uaP0}h9bt00=!vKoqym2%1C|IHkadb(@1=OSRxg=G z#(Y~js1!H==VZ)XYI&4rG`Kl^Hvc-Uoq>IR>#M@gqM1vKb=?V=VSYz*%YLv%_I6-< zk%LCT+EzN8z5|n2l4tOH6{afx&BSBmi3}-Z>2FH=z6Q#JwW*pLZK8#>5DMA5036Em zb)>85hO&QUGwGXfB!xAcrRyo$le?!UK$^b_ zgeBiEZ3^Bt-EcVQx0HE*j%XUcOjCbX#IS%0$91QZR8*nmeU{%i;U#_iuD;RC!4(QB zgJ_%>LXVC0p6Jn@m0~zcL+gp6NNH7IT)-3n*X@3)Z3(J>g9gWgFyVM_4a*F80VbU< zn9N6AohBA)*UOaK=3U{z>$fi@;VA|JoAC`D;eGx#vAr7GEOc%q(n)IpUCWM{x)#uS z`vT3koeMM-boC=()I)xvAR>vwxo9Ry?sU~@N30<5=e9~!U{>nP&fS<{vi2a-S-*@9 zL+jHMG*k6|X>-+HFXPr3_#$Kuszk1iciQlgZmdCpgcMA?n*anFDwk|)YI@y&Tf>JB zAzt;6(-(@3k&?l&Yc%I|a!aNHZA{;bh>aJH`#+T-Zj<2KF{R6}x&XL4n(voBYkcOZ zXpZrNg`jK+$6ck|REJSj`NM+ie^v}Jknsx5)B~17v%7fqXXVQi+c?F|1+5(^TqC&G z8fH^gzIj-d2+0{wbXkHFwW0g8|IjPem97xT76QFw>RJ>HKK!6>$dS>))~{;U?iEOX z7d1LN^<2+2L4?%V9P%dE;o_n(tzdbIvb^cStML=kO}}lY!7fMcuX*gcw2a)!>9=lW zi_TW~1M+=Ue6c^LIo|28`b!z+_Yz4)RQ=o5dLpM+&naMKs({v&Xb1G#X0LJGHqm!kk zKVn40uJ?)`K~)ZQadG=Y#mhb-o=$iD_MITD4mgjWkRIA-z%1^2{bDv@XUJz;h&x=d ziwcBU<9$UFYU_^zKgFmr`Uxt-|~ipI#YR&ehz$&)OuF3gUr(t0di^ ze0kC+7JwNFjm`!fD*mLMZHsr}T)N>E=-sR2pMEcaTe5$otdKp!tuKRB<%Sl0cmK_; zJG>AYaHy@3o%_H(5LRq^RNz2#pitPhYqhhQqLg`jg|KNn=mW%SUBRkyH#S#EkX<4g zy8+&=45TI^GG98pd~tkRJ+P#ITSs^L$Fe^Q6Ot&mA`o0By`O*o2j*$LjR99UuaVK3ddK^(Er*;EQQ~m(D(2R=tE2t?+t*la(u+vP zay{)?YshIPbgg&wxF34qkDf8#`@ff37WK_2qoW+=idyZ|8EpcDY+x!q*QF|DX#Aw_ z@RB|gZ);6Yo_w-C>0q^gBh>4VkXslas%|y*^K`8WXi$K+$;qZYGS7oE!QnsTlZt2f zlb#dX^DJ>fGP0&xqM@v$Spg3TX6(k&%;`=>v18jPjC==btDn37VV}^mY^0nJvi&@X zy?xhu>zepMF~K8uoIR0AL^tv>c%e&uk;A=f7q^ z5RcI0nJsan87RHX)eJDJwPZP0{L;0=A<# z2wQxuqE^ww2%u9h+noZ_nstoQfX};heuQlA5rJLjG|$-_`p`oNW{^#w+rDr!A(ekhR!n7CT1EBPWaV*G z>(aSZo$=!P1wl|YrBT_gd($he@k2d2h8hL+B#s+~iu7lD!#oe^~ zBwj~eMWAJW8L1+^#X8s*kt`7!NO*ew3r7M|$NE$lz{>5cFbM6f9V|VLN32t3E!>=`p*DM z&_62ib=3;GU{}Pj87vR6gP_seQBy_b@bkQ@@NCt8!AId(5oBoD z@j>^WCxEXh9t+1jtIE+(qiR9wwF44h9TjNyG67&FW0ESSldyJUO1E%UA&(MwzaW`8 zbj|y9Lxi6u=3eSdLHSbK!gG1%7tE$AO3N@8goe%9!F#F$)<=EV1-=Eo3_ZXkkHJ4- z6ds9xVluDPJ!1gO^%-BoMTWgmk%QoO#hd6;#;xEF;yh3Cpx?4zo_7oar{Add8gvj|u-3pV6eB>=F*%f3ddnH9DW*cuPI)Ff{<>tLSls zg3$jhG8`|xAHgV&smDw9nT^U!|L;A26`1vGGbV^x7!yxEM}?8b#He(U%>rY#c<4zc z7DJFwsn$=Ilip#DWDyr=aZL?1aZO8fO=Jml5`E8JmeM;p-fbF}O$jDQ`jD#^BRdPy zEI~-`0=ddvV+suTS@WJb##rg6%76LhrK-HdN})6#1BIGk8H0W2UXv#HGGz*XyBka% zeDdOT2IEtsDmfA`90H=OUlULxIKggTmX6~w9LDc2yfyxFA)#2s+3J%w$x|v>M94)n zS)1|3XzDI{h$nCBev7&(C8?grmkhhkN3WR)Jaoth>(2WBHvr1^wSrCW#0+}WDnbq^ zWrS2&tG))%6pR2;0QAuD7Lx{lapaRE=@sM(Y!Ry*=E9q-zHN0|sn#uHKs#w`?+__! zVN;vrzVPHf!xt;=+PnLIKcq{|61t~I(%794r%d@kx0Hz(K-(gGzE~kl9(*dO)Ag&7 zK(EX+VYsu2ShK^L&P<{Fko^{DfjcDHiW@HcqV23y!&ogr{G>M|jKVd4G?Es0W^ID4 zIwA7C755QF4Lu%JsxKx|ZUi^y-O+QaKRlROYEiRZ(o%S4J?iE?(g3Xgyj0}o(Zjq* z>%Hl!tr(Ni$LX_Gc zTM0ZCqMrqel^B=S!xO@P)UL@Lb|2*{A5m&F{G~_1If_s4)Ak9M`U(fBT5r6ro_tOI z$ew&nDpc|;S7p8NCts8&7q5Z!aR4)`YS~>HFPH3CC(@;Jl&v8jN~ad`YRdga)-_D_ z(@sin4nqrIiY(_3JXSBCtu|)SUkdoR^g8RcfPCC#yI=^!ymTCYd;8H;!-6*2Qb_oS zcyr=-MCb|{JeN9BDIDlhMvEvYnO`~?7j-_+BdmBQ7=w)+a7T(w0HxwHIM2*lSNWgJ zd$sS2uA0HMsd> z(1UM0O>Hs{zq!yGmi5QZ%D1<+VySZ;7mBiZ%|^Vi!&0Ni&!2 z$y;${5St}`slU#*VKia3qdelFb=?_pYqjK#2xZZXnHHxQy$4`_mU1?k)=0XDO$Hy{ z%Uj^+QG#LtGQVlXFHy}lnf%!Q5GaN(K+53m^Y zld~1r6wK-Dq2;Rcqzxg`-!<^1rS3g16i4#j=6nzD~^>)v*-YonqW)D6s;Ij zrd=2Z^-l%y{Phj#;=1{@OjLwsTg#e=>j(OORR?OgobL!ZeJHwE$fKGZ#X(dC(TBd` z54t)!#QSkno@FYscycz+6DtP~S_bPO<=!)YCN^6{Z*=L->KZv^|N7I0s9EkG8!w8W zhk@Gnzx$VsyW*+-X!Z%O0Fwv`_^LM}1w)FK*^r1I6kMzAke1&cjpr>hI5FOHJ~|tJ z#HswMb!tslqP)QAS>4r;x9u%hx2`ABDqaQm$zCHq-jD++1gY*>=#29m7JkCW;0Q`xD%zJ-kW1;I2RF$RZB?w%1dG_IY3Hn!*>ywqO-}c3;&@9zdUmRm zh;%((d;%-QoR9OVFiwg6+r{pgd{7YD6LM}^9JSq`EN92br8uN+v;LKNP)}sE`pJQw zB3^B;7M}Mf#@zuEkJ+nW64*G84_F7H8-e(XnWZ)>y} zGvn<_jQ0Q}2~fd_vsssdw~TC}uZvemzOV2XgDOxr3?2}C7C#^r!lrGI#O9u7U?!Wq?xExh~9Th}P-BeIw=)&iG z2Y8)YVd(X^lTL!q#e=8Cs@N>>0&h0I>NmpeX(f2OID4JVLnL7p?vE1p)^<-BO=>ay z{|y&VD(b*0MaY=gG4y!{c>Eal+%3rFm_!_Q%2uu`tZ$X zT45DqqmBj*e6Z7h2PsT3qgRo$`4`emM!xL=K?+egbw%*dt%Z0sXLlbWx8uD1WHj)I*@V`f5&rmF&4R~P>BL3`|R;66$kv@qbccMZ`X0@VBUqn-MJG6^n+W;Bycm$U^#YMB>1b1IY~^?Gn7(PK!9Lnuip z_c>6G&jcp612wi@`oN0Lok&b}$nLwwfhdQ%Pmi{SIwibj)5!~2`KDXi%b)v?OZ?>o#9m*X(<&c%3A6Jbkiw*ahz5#o6-)M5bJNrenz4W1Hm#SbJ5dV2Iwp~|r3E8Yhl}jZE3qLC&fND%+ z*AJAuV`C#H4bDfb*#4@7&^+cJqMIrTwF_buc^KylURRkz*Pd zwr$t?0Ghk{H$Qz1hdhG)|JT2yPz@D-y4+o=Rm?9+p25HN5HLF z+x4~u1!}9gOOaDNu|iJ4|5+kmWzbj60KEmfot+gnkCJb>PE5#qbVG#MMtV$t*UKHy zbmliq>X+`29PZ}3gTt9U^sUTxBpfkR1+yIuS2VXAQspq@-FVxmavQe4HQs>yLrbN> zKVaa~(&<^GABMSc$JyN3B4p#L=8!vgYp**gVQNZVHQt-+p~InQS4!(Rl0yMJv|7cd z)d$3ir7vf!-1)ae=oH;7^=!6(zEV0{Vb@C?$qC=X?Y{PP(EF*^p|X6!LXgtF;j7T+ zLfZ*UUCd^*q%iss+;SxOnqJ3K(eRxVFoJ}8wsFgTMb=@!vcZ%vI0~TSKMn#eSSHS; z{o$kkw!CL!mM)|Xe7T^K^q4*Xpm(OO4$HO8k2l3nuUqrkUcHcQ1+fNyS{h(H(K3+t zZcEpcyshL8)Hk9`ie7ZtgtL9-8oNh+=YR;v&(OqPVXyTxlD=lTifP;A87Eu)XKd~N zW6tkaXZ7hS zfO$Ia%irFO2ebUizCr3@Y7Oz0m|_)a#~eANmtLu{8H&Mb^Q&L}pDES3NfkULb+$^x zDcPJVCS@^3zi6o%qBJM8sC9S@K#Dh-v}{tiJ~{g-XlNov&45aOUCg@<%O`vKRVGP- zzjw?wg^%89hDaF@2j{#{FIuDg3pV0a96o5R2Dzt4()ymI*pu}ED{1*byVd7}-GtYW zaY#)k`$Cfq8pa>$LmT+$V$>%1qqLG2SoRqILxiG@yCBmo42RXGiGPg)G82B82Ga{) zri0$Eyg@J7pC@R4idR+TANjQi*1O60DgvUWvyNu}vc8fv!M%s9U}_oBTRYptC{(mY zz(*-Wh-1Sj|CVfWbX~y0@1S6*W)GoX5OyG**GmWY2KO3Rg$ohe>q7%o$H)b;yi!K8 z*d;Yby}F{TIijR{tH2oP@}zXC9$IwPcTZm%jNFG!$be;kYt36&MvU!rt@6de6HKmN z>wYz2ShtP2)|tb}2SPVw9BvvSeU3%b^vt8Xq)4R43dg#5XEi?e^;e={C-u8>V1Sra zJDu0m{U!4rZ!mDVJSn5mj)EVNd9J}YB_WePFzb4-_How1GGs>tsT_&B@YDOC3O{)!$UwKGxVSZxG=Nwv-CB9_`(ya_z}l+CMCg+2*53q2e}G4h?vD zqe-Zs09qe29FEJx0EE< zD1)SV!wWq1&TTmhR;_Qv!b#~e+BlXPH(icK1?)rjoU>e~0v=h+ON*OUsfDkRk<7AK ze|~*`jo`MnLFzbFwz1(nriBH}O}743Mh)@%V>B^qoXy&}#3E+MbZWDnkjf!4th9Dq z!V@r1IWyajogV3MlV(H$5}^38)2G-?pzQKk=i01YDR$Y=)6pPmE+Bc5xnh%cdza@9 z+wT6~v8js_5fAjXJt182!VO2zox8evEOq36)FJtVj2cfu1}JinB2scr@9?1VdHi;% z`<>FXjYL9CY+8=0IAh)6@IY!CekDI4SqYSdHd`7^v41%6?c-ts|LxP6z|Z7t^&#H?bXuZIzzc7-!2K<#$W(Ev4N#%ZL6d-g zrre`d+6v2T^6jf3K;?t`t$O;B3J_9Q?=?tr6^7qWEk1gN>S}~=&cU--APD+ z_&cpwyRll+BaFEYDN}uTP7oT*Pf~RU(LIqyF%Cqja@4v_sgF;MUeB`{R{&z|Go|yg z-kqqm6jwQ$B`CFoMNtzf{3c9LDdN0;9+B9;6CexjLZ*&|x1dKqm-t~h@%;^%L~Lgo zNKS7yzl1(^+vf#pLbxjghO1}gvzl+(f_ub80i%v{`i_0>0Mo1nc0`3HBYWEbGl$tm ziD&~}QMQ5`xqV-l)umv612vv&S@l=rGS^+f7{`&|{n<#dm&Gb+pd?5<4G0f^GQse&ZyW4FxdDA`tS*TdJO=zqi40mjP;41*@p}fF*qT-il^ai7 zY+cy8g7(XM19P&lJmvk$pnb~0dX zs5sVn!9mG1`;x5kIz@A@C_`^+5yMPxU}U@|j>;^K5njLh(+R>vG2Je@)03Z4Rg{|A z+{%K*bb->DyF-^J$$bUN35pE5|YR#=r$4Z)E9pT z+k~UDv_r_Nh@(_%Y11fZx}c(a<>Te21cs*+1}uG2a@^JXteySDxcMZhWH4r({Ks)0 zPF;W_6)n@%>e71>xyiP_jlGFiPyu5_8|h>~IKX0at5m>rF7C7D=~gOI2`;kR$MCr| z`~96(hq(g^lPhn3a9SvXTtLcI$8Y{Nj}uPo7V877 zPN{E-P@a5%YHuDZZnhmgdNN@hNDIJ0`|JY3m$gl;bVzv_PHBqP-C=v(^4|&?n==tp zAR)`hOGxt!;6hzC0Y3+=3!(tT=w zl^_*Ih4Q?`MF4Y%CL3YLaJR3&#&9Eadh45hNM-o;NckLT5{OzU`TVp;-hcPRk$3%E z!q;Ok-3)f@Yq3>TL&AOHE0F=+Wn7kx+q2c=eMyDF&pNDi5soD@!kq za(XRbOc&Ll#kZnInm(yTKV?d*2%s#(unKm!Ns-6|zv9C%Z)6pAa@{vtLggBNDNjX7 z*xak8m^!|yUlEzW)p|5}r$FpG%{udMX&Q!N0SPEUw;MkZtK&H%KMl|E=n~vKrBT#R zrg5v~hD_BL-q!kdF!?he>_(@b#%%)Vxjv>WD)?>h2C290&Z@^K0)4*i{#YsscE%H8 z-#Y6skm+He;UV>8l#^zeO-?v}atRaIU~3*u>8|NrH>VN$EeHG`i&_7m(4GY{uNz0E zA5i|&y>QY`xQSG2H~S1q0ZP*@B-P|%=3%Rf%mINhC?L8O-4IjNBpR9k$^}SVkucL{ zl1QiM`c{h$tsGTYBVr18B|)0AT65SyS!G8pLpU=y0Z|{JL$RxDb-C1kjtQ_e43c4R z-$1IjKCr|;hLtPen~`JHlFi%~q(0Dys{pRH+l@iQZL{2Tj3iE9mR&EY{+1NrJF29# zhQ~#lS&yc%_5YN+fL>S0*kg%c;ZL8<9<)_gj#f#1&_KA(&S|=Yea%g}=@rcr;os{( zm7h<&KP$IPO#TdrC zA+F|wN9M<)&Sq&0NiB=3bnUZ?bf&A!YQp$yK|6TLXo*{sL})0RuFlh0bEWOAsWz<= zWh3HD?2Xzbi$`96U{kP|5%5u+mIC>m?sK2%bdY1vU9Yf9;ThdP8CFl&Phx8aQO77G zd;P-Q7ipQXI^sY?PE{P9yL?U+)7lkc`luKcsR`LJ?0HyaBGn)5z#NJevwu_)a(hVk zPJd(RTeW8|r`*$`c*~$an}^!RTC^^7-z{`qfkuhxZM(03uZ+(2B25toabkHiQuF_9 zV~&tY>m_i^G#jL%5MM#*@BX|ia_FsC1dh?!frqJ{;+S?3VI6mPq zutpQ#xNb=45u?Ub8{MXy zcaXL%&5wwGefc!P0**@4*U}}9WdDWZ!m-Fr?6FYW%=;Nov(a;$|1JAVwR;3b_O8*o z#+Ag1hKW}>gNn-+UIPA`ID#b@;WxywbpQ^DiZ^3GxZ0SlnN-`WIdZIy(m&FIqHp<9 zyC!e?p@ZIhScp%!l2KsW7zc?mag&1)F0#6e_GYqw^b8v+rY)c^ml|7vcWhejE6!yk z+h!QoBXJ?xdS+*5dH;m{T~bS~(=(ZgyC}=bDU)i-R0vH`vH|*r`KPwx^@q%$jW7oXH0$d0H?(RC$(Qv? zqoZ?w(JcLRqV27FRm3jT`3fubL+EmXRruq%{jD-);M-cDddGJHwi*rCYfe*&jDJaN z_N5*KGG%50^WDF>;F^HJXsLlCMUbWGRqZvrGp6=5w7tJ(1OhUrRq8XpIuVr-rJuh0 z)2byz=aCeXwxT?3kRMlCt_&bq>*t%MQ=!Cv!2Ha}b=?saC<=mefQTe7ciUF3tnJfuCSkGhhXWCMP3q|1n_JGwh`ext27E!LQeoVCw`{7#O*`)|7DVHK6COn_@2(7A%z0j*+5mq{fu$ot|Y=p}i7 z#w%Rk+J2hkWYhq;gkz%42@n@VN{&oX**ubE1~Sqmc`KB_L7FFHgYZpq`=DS!LPUf> zh!4B&mQ-UA&=7%$3=~rAjKPhWk3A~-DL;ZJMQ$NAtKes@6tM8IuqjHPn=V|%w2F_s zZHLZaHP*b54~sI_yP~wU57yJi&`Pv_tbsHNYs3)QY@WUynsM9y2bs9I**!!Hgcz!g z@-^VnA=!FP6H1=xX+}pO=T3DSvU){IXw5B1hdKd;J3Y?C%>ljI^#4n4!{=dmBshnG z1QQ=zyT&+SheGi2KKEL|u87IO`2xN{X%%M`U{MZe*3N`ARs94omzJ~2bxT)&YpSwd zUKW5VEgO9->2*M9>yyWmZu@LXBRc1VNKme1KLy~%=U-$a9)^PxDqffDKXNiyXCvP{ zp(^L$=iB4I7SW5fwXei}!v;KX#!Tt?wPQJByHzd3ecE6yi)cEl`D8|J&0vgmq8+ET zD>;)rCgrnuRNg_nMP=2Zdq4$$Yu1KzU@{w~Tu=$jUZpdP zIweRSDn&3&YN3V)tp%vu0{k%r#_sn@+>Fl}hFuxkswzr08p!2rDbfIAx`85({US!1ELL7s6@}UN5oMk90A*sZs8M76osAU0sL5xp?Ri%(-J9sH8h?^ zsRUtEhd~=8r_da_EVYJ|qAcXb4qQoV179l%sSP?92(+vHIN~@1K#_S8)cKTa%slI; zV=5Q7FcXU1QN*CwKdEPxhN*J**U6V~T^$Kr2O$Zm3q`ot72;sS{zajpM~oLgIuPX# zlNI`$0zZIPse#R?BXxs+;Ujyl1+Ca>(uZ7m9^RkQst5cKo1n`19A{N^*}o<2Zyq^yo|Zfq3fTVnU)FQgeuh z#{mp>Xwg1@ePkY&j+Lu!pbQF&b}0$;z&SvsF6Bccak)p(oe9!^%nCrvK;?{QrOL5k z5SS=@z1*nGhHJL7*)@V8vS)XyQ`3T|2P)7!RIzfQC~>3}_To6_pP2LYllJKk0y}?B z49)|Di~1UMF>fRQSR4cftFV<`cZ5FgmO}HXGOCp@{_P~Sa5mo2q zilWf-szG7Qu&ru;&XlB@FIH~q9e@-O2ftRINnfJ&0%-l+f-K3-JX5Gkva;!N3Xo|_ zY8OiDiV}!(e#_MW1a?@ow^pcyRh*61@sI=jsv}afnF}W*eMbbG7t7?7G*bxT6e7LL z1akERAqo!<1LWKw)k#q5R2ixb;=&mu3%%cz8B5N=3?VRoq||x2-Dl)0zL6YT5g1!k zFMXjv=$*UofA`-ERs8+${yTDxT03pREEhgbY@4_%rxV-jlmrczp4yJh5V?MADvY3eaFXR{(6HzIJZ-@%$Sflb(`=C&&1~pc2z>u{S&wZ+jq|vb`HY6%CmNJrFs(&In zmP);qpUZWs7!rn>s69)~(TQV3I(C=mqg!z(Lpl9%K}0ds(jx+QVB`-P_3JKwmR3{x zo9gXrI!;(R$FP9d%FD*bSQuJfhBF&;*{u|+Ej>zq4&xwRC&1KNX5Zr()$F=H#DpE|FN(BP!2>&$m2(rCm=s zdQ$2)>RO!dY&r3q%swj%8wu*BbX*5!8O&ps#L@%<^o>An+{knS)KLauBR;J?X(|g)kD6UdbWc2Il^}b9~Qcr4!8EnNxF}IR*WFD|27wp848K&sru= zl}Wt1>`wak?zoF3$9-^U;{l#klOVF#1l37@)kBh#QFaLpC?IJlxtU0arN@Q%p=3N# zZVM~am(8&3rqxHgm25(jNc2po*q{M`o$^(>I!jwA3luQ>sRGXiDr^AEa}~jgLT6wr zJ66u}ysT34jL)#9LyE|-V>MyvAXjX4p?G)mfnVGJpR@u9=(DT^K`5HebuL`iH^ z`w%NY*(~Z{bhC8EhZ>&ZW2io8Ym`$1Q*1E`%?7QQc5Fs!EQeK#U2(Qtj z6-tzSRK8jX@P%}`cO{^7G`4fL7GHnmJZ?Ei35$wyr035DU;<5Tg|onqPTy9A1*$?o zWUYhV=1!AVT`0s#H`02t>NccZT6OjtH3x;MLlZSgwwZ#f!b%z=L{*cinG08&8@9GZ zpbfiH|AQW;_V3%KJ7cK*HO#?(Aa~ExF7($^O}2yiJS=N4+u{Nx=DPuGr8XBF8xvIp z_{{qioE%)&-2@J^jg&&6Mty8v#UwVYSu9xD!IJt(IR*~ZOolZ z9mfQXIo<9YJCcvluzJ-WrpVuemeNF?nnm*rFDZ8arDY-z1}LP>y+m1gR&+&BR<6KmJ_{LJS)JLSs`?NQw{^~if5q{|>v_MW7t zS__U@yR49`E(Bt@l8*e6f?Q1Yjq%Aq75UKBCf>1((D3CZV=uKlo;9AeIwBwT=Bj|H zinl#K2|z$PW#9Y=H|EQKa?=WtNc5Ggk&)|p6VXajq^fqR{tJNDD7)YXVymiY~@#9Bb^uEn^FRmlY7?iZ!=qIH+ zwCD%Dt<^8f_;uTOA#UsKHre3Jh-fW7>Rk$A|Ez?ZvC&q|X6ej-E$W;C^uIaPYpcY^ zW|XQ@#_%%!x)7$D;1gooZ-oPDjB)BO*8~!DRbt${J@=2%A;x zo3nr5qJRy6F%F46=i&6F+w>hB>Vn>(Za{flY+gkl<=4gO;jazYkgvt+>z2fY9!=diPI9u17VPY37@8OX>oMOo_CaN zcGd2c6EcQ&1Tm=Qx(s&i=66aOAO)_n=8q2a(vgDlbGX@KugVz%Z@zSZq?pn-kt8lW z_!|M3zk^t_9BtR==U=*uf!{FH66UpRC89QOsmQ~B{t^-E@J((dFj>tKJFFSHn{n*< zEGUNdlNsD+E$+zs=X6F4hEi=9xbk*f;@$hDyAgsQ#_!6msCn4rN>^@Hsw8(5Upi+h z@(V)`Jlh`oVF_jgz&V21ZlF4@H}=44k&W4CCdYZ8n4F7jwpq+)xPIFswKL+a&Y*3D z2;2*QUC-8D0zCje9s$lDJUH@)baj7Y(W%(H*smf{kUq9jm726P)Yt(OAmms=$NB20 zML;JA)Y56m%hd2<*K|6j;5Mz4C1Yy85M{P42vH$bV@SWfdnXYHI1~BV&U`nKY}}|I zf~siwzG0irTqw+Lsy0RxzviX6l!!dqg`8J^nlE}2noo?H-x{nk6I{X>JbT9bKeB;R z**x*EbUILxP1~dsd6YTU8TZ3aq;Kt_xhrZ&N)m1xvuyY1rRl}X?V(c8pq2#V5m%BH z&q#^vTlGME!Xys@g<er~F#05~juq?R?)e|9B!vsDWp_-;~n9q*4=lNL68I zVQPiEYu9aOaURJ`qu3Po=fG7G@eMp!^?`Y5^fR0JJIMtnQ~YT~7f2dcSKU!7!s0%VS<(rfyBAW`38|V6WR=XLOhX zr8x4x{zY1GFTJaNsuq=(o^s0zE#z87X~CqiCUr1)v3-=Gcit=Tb3$be)J->@8hPPv z+fms4Mh0+1Yrf{WTLzVOSWuXLkHc>*ged(W*!4l!q9uxzLoI7 zdl@2_0UvO2?}lwS57KwFW(rtPR%@vJR-L(!vGLx7yQQuv+Ex+O07U>znrDSgM)Z)Q zBjn4a*A`6x(pRgu`LM@#5)2vllxEzhBtL~D^tsxdrzL#;>K)I2=e*d*rkCHF!P5nI zQ|7e`{y>43JbqRkBDkdho+$4sEsk}A>8m^qHYuFST9atB^j<59w~%TR+1xzzwa`x4 za{ML&dhSd{*!KkDzrtD8WG|w`N2wTV5z}0=Qmo&y-zuF8YG!<|)?k%luT8E~ z^EClFS2onw?OCaRfl5l>REA?}ukpilq03$aGw%s)wd{9^w}mk@UZz4G0VZ92HS$Kf z)Ts2_048RU9|iy28q(+lwV&}B08%U2{L&t{+><4nh|R&QS-3$dd?_Bqj(l+(ZECt{I51yUVVG^3RJV$$LwY>w zjrCAlGbdAjYnZZUYZY~p7Lfy}h(5<{b3H#DVLbWHh5p%okSrin&O!HWqN8syZAlAq zTQ5ju%NwcyJCW|53itxm7MM;r!#_n4Flx#F=&c7$XtHrobTjMi1Qh-`)}ZR8Jnb&# z={RCI5~`5cXNZUD#cWE+MO?;jMF`T*GHO>?G*``kg5KwijhZ6lAZw2Ix2mB;Ps1~& z78b1a`V{UHbq+wZMO@?As7wTdG3I87F?$ak1W4?kQDxWAsBRs`i6;E8WG#KBo><2t zejSAz0S* zVEq+;^4A}>cNDGInwHekyM>@Uj{zBw<&ZWrJpl6sC-R0F2#~+NIL6S&t|xEyv*^y{hM;Pr7T~t6@Y0frXw* zp;L@XiG^ZXdhW<}!tXCH(vy(#H=6(?deMh}?`hugG2XT0l-cW!CX`wRfWIVEUpqhfSk4j@njMC& zIc_&pE&W_XZ)pR6D_}pTwwGhXuxvX(RqMR7S1(PS0@=w2zyYY5^en}4m zR1cL27@=t*Jyg;>B&oMy;q1>O_Z(LY@*v_+Vdl>AQ`WA0?7%6^u7rkuGQ@*WwyO#wrRtmb_!%U-blu(_keM3P%G4Ld6|(#&o?H)Ig9fhjf&Y-~jJ(-6UKJ;Gj( z@J=BzOc?OP9Sjm{)8b8aYA^-X8=vm^)GWKQ7*$;LK*lP=l`x* zTW5l}{hHcMP!usL&lV$psq2l|0>BmQnkw)%fz`u|e3bXI)>iVBz2v2FYJBjZ{ZRVb zRa3yz7yf`;4W?=1$oI$#>EZCJ)#FX0frO^kUsEMs5@8aU`}&lOD$zc1xsxgnQ1+Y88?sWjDegifsp9ZG2zv3FyZ62S$tQ(^sUb3xfIBV?w=W5t5^ zpv2CT`jVypnXw{z6KB4@9#tgwH1Q9i**u4vLQZ#ebRB{19!T)w7&oJB)XYVXvEd?< zv#UUAaj-@J?(2y#kvHt$f1-!rf~S#gBvq>D zPV8$NhjlA<>OWmxjsKe+Zpxwj?)R6PYkq)n=xoKKcwcZ2$!lb1e<@H7t7yBGhy2o~ zmZ8}B_O{{Fe0%4Xw#u@YN@cl?uSIwymJh}bJjucd_%zuUGgshMZrOgVP8KEGGa2;fBQ`z>5=v7j9`&F+|4Vtp`6U-`E6qqw#;g)bhaz+X{7OP`j+Y$rxG_Z-5hITcvB*Ry28Cjuie`X zwSt^!u2v~|f1!L|wO_4-$C*+V(r+}$Z7QWNrBiW}KD(EX?POnW-@HEOjHlQlFUfH+ ztPWNK33NP=k&R+?RGO3DHoZbMq11kxYB%n@AZx-Gca50w;hV+dV4{2D(0l9;59_2h zk*rMY3LVU`J{k_EhKW`xW}xXsajRu$ZlEkFjE}hBZ%@CTjwJMS~qmI&2w66{B0RRU) zvQ3SXzCCjPyA-YG7e2@CO6TXztGt#KJ#T(#uTh^|`P*b-^DY&D>WY;XwxyH&_b9U@ zsUy-q!D-7M<(-fWtKWQvn_X6q#)RH%yZe8Kf6d~XNC^vgLo4F6!@5><+JzIFu@Bn%3#^QBI9>a0H~JnO{P9`Qu|qDMjxDj(XkJzRU!w zpgA%{Fr#NMsp;7 zedj=s;rw=ca4f1P6E@Mj1R zuE46K0?M`#T_nFKcfSVlGvzZkCR@V#FI}{(5rP*n*iA{pSFKNvI5UKJTq}OZtx5N6 z>2sh$e;rUz`-6g2*y-&Im7h+fg=;j(f7$CB#s+0_q=E5J`_})-j`8+gBa)^JjVW`J zpdvFGNa_BO@$@B$AQrB(K@|;e1FG1~Y-771YcRQetxP+|q8L$!_^+j}rv;|U97(yO zN^n34Uh!jDV(f2q5A z+{vlqQd-tIl;6wy8H00rYH9Sbc0~u!z<$q7s--XReH6LnnJn%Bb{#<*$Ave~2`X^^ z+n0l?WLdt>To=if11R(>Km(LB0>k5f>qa2XVd~m?MGNl z+UU~M(P4O7dTLM-mK67Q|s;r@WdwSK3+Nr&3jDYTa_EyCw*DI)W?nCk`-XZeoL9vKA zXQl_NCkmwQ92@SOdC$!1zQM;AT#`!J!|TK1_} zwylhqhAD5A_YAbicm*pDA2XO8MQe%f>o56lAm+bn2vK zx1IAmy+HZ}?4!Dy%7VLf%&jCW*$PQdx=d^VN>ouVDleAPfAclGZB*jmk-n;zf_c`# zb*77VXIFkdpmwrw4$d~OpCnzicNGR|D^KLOsxat_I8z`uzrwit)7Ju>p2(*2yWYYOD zseg;x^($XQe-SqAG?w#i&ws=rN)SqGv-zNS&)M~KXekq{tq>+WL8bT@M7wZ-l7^>D z8P=%lb3CKL{QHZT+<}+$p%S!Pu&F zy+YFNe~%WOND(;1sTVPiGyn?%B~e+3armYCs9zX5nmuXp@Cdq^*+oV>%fx0sW!&^Z zIQJ8>9@YI^`EN~4HYFSS(5#)xs*09m@?{4Ah^5zCZLSr=86*Ma*`?jGP-|5xOJ=Nc zyIyIoKB<6yde*Xo^8@pR&V&=wFrIoOZm9VSZ9@|Hc z{kjP2=z?AiBk{*lHSP~` zar3WId3quc?Zr6$v;ARaW9J+of7vj!;g}IDW2@|joj_Xq8>^I!xno$+bRX88z}K7T zf3g)c@LyTqP7lkb964~YZHa*9v|d#`-N$WuVb&iiCDOjVYnKj?Rj(&o$nY0VY7|Ht zTN-fMPLUCvA(_V@PGB8!{h_1%qMJ@QRHCM#z(X+j-_fPMQBv>R?oB(_el#uT#Mx0G zZ#d2hYxcz;Pqx9U)*^9Ng!1TB-3!Bdf7{)8b?BB^ss}T^ys59GL9?NTE37TOs=$Qa z3yW5wT&vCtBg2O#Y}W!vNy}*3OT?>>8-ZB^WjC0vzfif`^4Z1rVzTHN(re)}D0kE7 zDb_!iBqkkFOLj#GIi6f>+q?4;iYt|Oc3pEOo4K&q4j0m0PEqn4RLh6A<`*56e>~E2 z&0aK5v7&ifVkrX+s_Y2nd-5tHPb(FNNt+HjG{xYt3X%)LFp_Oe>E73dQdTwkKW`#~ zIiPk`)5D$WHc0i#Ik#<<36&lf4rh+EU|IU^{+sEDDq%Jloao;%ad8UTo6SG84O@%d zA~m=E3*&=Nrl9;gMAWZ%wwPq-e;PS(i6O)h122T=wRhx8=c0vwHuEm!?4p*VT1n|La39;mU^UWIo8Y*!pe7llF9d`f6$LR8a1ZJ zC}$h_jW$)m5xsQswZK@WlvwBsiT^Lr$(_o$+;|_5YL7ehSjuH0IT)~)(KAG+dOYb} z)D5Buy_{--$ zuOnJmiL#70ZX4+G6fa%8|I#raFR&_|cfg?%63wE0lXqm_gz6eAe-vH-c%Zd1>GUU= z{bCJ$43kg^C}h0waP$}G|45($(i6xrH)^i-i2HN&=bo^E)2`h%J{d||;7;=^`3urT zHzHVCb8M&!=*Ya{=oB|`?bCv~$qpy%8%Xcmn8&Ij*EKH5Y_byhI?zTR+V|;7iXTsyEaOzr}RnU~d zuo~nMx;FyZv5s?%BDcRG0##2Fm7<=lsZ52)gWf3$?s60&<<^TGA(&x`(39W-MTY$w zzWP()WDdIp>~h9+6DCXN6OnDyD~rhq>9k=bp#+ z2x^!qb+#@Af7Iv3N(JdEV@m)fv{YoRFpYdnb-N^i)n>Tm>EmTLDBFmDkQ2K0vGKKm z7q77p(J=afd!-*NAvxztr06;SLcTcXZw851wlAOnYpIt#@8iG!({jNb(q2!7^kJBd z3}$-dkfu>pL^oEP>Z9Ux@=MDt`&_88d8L#zSHTAXe=2Lm^6uYeM}${8n*~$T;p5UL z17vB~Q(%7}ZayHQaLA;34Kof1E4fS;&a50{cll&ePwOURRk)uunHh`MRn_Lc7Fbtn zE+wRg=w>$PEjg;a^`nG215^3tnINEKYFcN3?^6^pUMCo8$vUvSA{jG{s>Ob*`X9KI zz?R;ye}~c=L`)5WaWcIb7NGK5=Z%N_ww6|jzFpgF)K;s4ia}G%#vwN~0+{|**bFQ= zb4@+3v2YO8x<^r+u4P2aM$!-;`jJkC61pt!5}z)kX?>5shIi=29I%J)TB6`z zKJ*c3ckTpXR*t&bD5o;-qFCq2@Gw~rXjy706+WElS?|%yu>9Wiq2dQoM@g@epMyUo zVa`Mi#`?g)vmn8@=su1vv?S%9G!c3LQLnu2{~9U8d4*o=3SLs~eP<4-+Bv^U8jA_r ze-*Y2;oy0qMN!`@E77>!4V`EQw!l3R zRAG5A!Rju;h$%+;XQ@-|`@pLd91thMS6~?M_(>ihkzxW!m&SPt?u+4C0{uE+o-Dgr@HM5ik+4dWfOrbi&jvTiBA(`Lw2Z= zq$Ye2?UO|mXm*%Rm*)4AyQq9%1k*INpy1Fig*5lg6%RNPze~~(M zz;~yLtEErpnFM%QeKcETfUOlihJ)m=^iRCO>q1!qovhZAw@^!ODz1mDB5Ztvc(4T4 z=D(1S#fTc^CfhTTr6J~QF-^llp={&iY=tKfOjlSh>6B}~->xNbJ<*aY)q+mqhxAlvtw=qm`Wc z?rJ4svjR;u2y~TOKGi6UAZpR9+hGc76S#(f+Ra|7QT5n;3(C|)kpXJ8rd0@)?ey6X zh!&8u6fS||MaUMxHfyu%NCu|Mj{0sH+G5IC8oAhgRKbU|a!H*s1{w++f9-c1>rvRF zTHU%Qv#d()-R*Xf0YuBQ3A$*WZiSUaN>KWt`R=g%yKRYR0goA9^iISX2zxOKzz^*9 z%iofo%)N<|$xC`3?ZbpwO+~V2NDr00IaPkUT7Qp&AO!(5)Qiue+^#HLS{$tWjNfNv zcr6VLFNPJmuREIk>ji_Nv}Wdg%xLjZLoSkSC9lW8b}B5 z%Uyjt+S$Kv`*h?t%jDaD--C&(Z0TKnkVkVPg=+H;n{Mdu`4qJr933TVdhUm=X<>yY zp-hKz{N>wp+xW{`s-}pkjeP--Bh~@xvGQKKcIHf!P2L%@!_LlJe|6MePTDUxWI?^B zA_&xvY@SVxzTVF<(xm+)F``lVraNvdw>W5e@we)mZ1f^X5Bi$Zqhx=0kmN&sXojv+ zqgg#jfSOT;8}>I2rO8D9Wg-i-;{$R5F$N_}p@`+xQkJRcE zwV^|2R+ZWe)@<}IfBOx+#N|^4Hu2kA!6E7k!uC$v1pky#V#r>azJ@WFz&6?S2vQAt zU^EI%^6+Izn?6J4_Jz7~kLyyavqnWqFvb=< z#ysV$oGo%FCk|xL3j|&6==JZQH?npTKsb3Cmn{^{=)T=p<2R)`oltoEB~=G| z?NdcJ^^lbt;66`M4{qW_M%)j*A7m)6XyD|bQhRG)5Wg@ke<01yAZ_9S*A!kxBbr*+ zGuFNZ4p&Fke{~Uq*uzb`|K0aCZhCO9jW=%Zmi}?O?Cu-4u^jIg8}dsOPbuRUo4=@S z^S}>8RRb^`kq9L{G0~d}WM^v(gQeK^N|LTsjuJw(PP>xt=$zh?79~iGu?;fk)R)>7 zL=H11xNAA;Wsh%>rQ#%5NfUcjrxK2-%QxI`Qe^VbTNme4fFYVs7P%xEGgSmwz zh|0TEj%?u9`bYp>?o+Nyjv#^|Lh~F3H7@r$N=eYfd98UxKg&I{6Nl9s{LS;rB z-Nr(<5>FW;Vd|!-%FBH{3X;y-ldHN6O@ywf$TB8L>;`fF@?WbgS8RBrxC$iSz}Kj> z!jXY@f3FKdtoRg+htPmUD=5!KyBC;LP*Np>*$d`R8{C1w6N%tg#UyF}P6B?X4EF3y z+jC*>wf^3LcdI(}D@=&yUHCf)3r|aPGAxS7&{* z)jZ|Xb))6_Qh~pWCF+lfGRN+0sGWD+dDL@B?;0Sr%E<|vtO%v%cbup&oK&Sbq;)w{ ze@fjTF$8Sryl-Ps|6{(3-f1HpOq?%Hx!sp`v@{HIcQ2el-1KImgr1&!m`S#1Zzk=t zr76V4QgE;)Y2A}tC&6k-hu)#_c92PJ`CHTdWKc^Nu=KMtp{3)k5nT)TDi^VNQxqt* zCd1T9BB}o>2dzAUAvufgBODIpbY`&ve_d6(z=vTR#02%;bJSk1QJD@r^GzT(|6;1- zn)?)x6!**vC2Wg||HG2c@|R^xNiIhmre=f%1=mD+NI0P{Ac0~*?FVu5RuTb&c%wQ^ z@7OJ^*11kv5BAM$AE_RR*SNPLsNwt)ico0!j7h$>(k9q$XotNU?(uObb7Dq0f7+*L z)DJB5BOhOEud2SJcJ8>QPEolc^m*fqP(^td6H&%HDKe1c&Q=irkmJOGLgKqJJ+(~J zc9KXtZ8Gi4KPh^9;v+>_bN&8deN<^MtU-`<~pUc4L8nFoRWPh8XH$s z=u}+*3-`68aC|F=TZFjR(%Z&Uf7GK&hs@;1`MAUoxT4mnO7P>Z?b-FnzXH1t`ka2LcYDXxXFYTf7aexJd*JC zV$>ZzKEOk?8=GNsm1XY^GI2Qk2D;kX?{fi&E69Oh@S&X_j!#2b_(5Wdf1W?48=rEB zTesl72|ejAHoq?V)7lX@E*%uXWyfPfD~==k`VklYdez>RlS_+q!a)|P!=hi#`Zr3v z$9>b07HcRew6T=6+t>+(vWNKA1QBHs z8X@9C>Rk@f-{|q*u|c8pCE>C6+xGBmvyQ9)R^D83?HF7_f)9dsrC0n9{xd{Sz5rMx z!ivfXJZTxVRSot-_oWfOkmgEEVi zH;1+l!(?*+g_L`ce@x#^TNkc1s^I4wM;H8Vt$)h;7Pz0XDg*1xdyRRTm<_AAqdj%a z{a5MMus6$jg>dAJvklvLB0$GD@z3Ubuk#zFG=iE(e5Y0pCb1+-0P4NmB@6{SLwjJC zNwb4nPomM!+&9YL{Id@*IKTWP49>s5xy8rauB)-9i^VU$fB4UM#DAOaJGHLpA}rGL zKMBT(f9WF>Ii5#}{LG84F2ATC4f4q@OU|uNako4ge!45W+2E9Cr&=>Qpj!?P`q)j) zvU#}!;obLgAf&8v$7u3UAH>hPDm4d6_Ti-Q1BacNbE)_WPJ*e*ua)XQh0+MxYuNAF zYcpN2@arm4f8sv3l`8Kb`q`VrRTOD@$SL6_^FhwE4nG7b->C9t12ES#h{lQKZ+lvXQoaDAlwTaFM=7n@#TY9fIaC zK!&N*b&!`c|C2(pEoc-eRzzhFHve?D zFc_^yI1obRE~;$l1Ie%GQxRX-p}&Vy;K%|NPK|MBl{FwL8@|o0;^_62$G+YNb@^c5 zm(ra#e`4VCqYU=im%VL(#>`T%amgOA4dfoJ@Q92)#-dEAiW??q70_~jR0ZaCBjrlB@zf|Cr__jtKLZ-R!_#|dIpE?K9Or>Hd< zz0oo~_TT@BlxQ^(XSj+E=&P^ve+97&d^5}ae`l?3ROpOxZWchnqxSa*GOeP`O>p%z z<0$izB)p;Bx^f7HpM5i_x>2KqjxWFXzvb$`{Nn#H;De4bvH?_~R$MGuX~s(P)M&B$ zR>J7h=A@*2_>K6_>QG7Zx^x=AAXl}apWCu836_lG&wP1n4aBS|oHNFt9UlxqsMV|f ze+AU0-l%D(dPeH=omu~fP9eu!oCc?2yB)VkzbjJS(`YgsdHzeJ6WZe+W^FH^rk;lxrSrOUa1IbWf0w-sAi%7P>hf zt^C|f?^aEK`8?50<5+7qY=JP*HFzw6WxqY`!2d z#YNAFL-yP}V`TOz+_F|Zls4_*x_dQ09-307BRKAe;5wqI?#^swtQJD9AZRk}f3Enw zC!>E)T;bX5{7>TnQ%nfxVRqL7!Kcfp=qZ(!M*;ncqbd8|P6z40+}Y8yQYNf&n(U6& z{@SU>5*xZ_-=|Nctj82woz!)BQQ{E0`1%SSkBu!HYIRA z>9B-Xg)8?z0GBTsL>UDoj%J5Wf4A%zx6RAjsiN~;N-Y}-y=Jo@QI+R~@E?Zol7C%r zujP_6T&4q9CY-ByIm@5^01%Lb|!W1}Iond6Zp-r5b2MU^5YJ|yrZ)Ja}-)5!5XIM3Qf1e|ZmYJJ1 zI?3*|`^DxP1Lj0@h%~>V37u}%36E8#V2Mo|X7-E{nD60b~O`peRmu}x_ z?4qUXQ9fK*A5RS0)VEd}e{0jqk%GZKq!c{{D z4&FkE9x+8N`+~`>wd4?xg*+g^T4rUErgvf;Z^)``Z4iR_$-cQ6wYb9MsJREnv4KC4 z8&W&aF5o(e@l#i*&X(Q6x27HmvZ(6l$)4 ziCO=SZm#0Z@q}%%e{W_pn@jZ*pTj_k4?BzV>HSz^2uY(Rac}#amQHtSt z{49n~!xW5maN@{IIvx3spo9DD-1Lht@%6v`@Qn1i{K1-vY=T}~_}+vPesbj>LPCho zYZb9KE6lI*e|NQVs);01KVP}__-$7jh&PV=?9_C2PsB+_#$woKQck~alZWMhS zuo>X?ku%3_VB<)eb5MlxpSu0{)k#;|Tz?`m%ZzAE?Q+S?Z5f5hs7+34Ag{dJ4Q6a> zdKMh9f9nxnIZu>LN38CYCy{(;?_nV*b>I_qGWYn2#-bQF7#ttQ5s#k$lyL%l`h-Ci?Sluw<`1mnX$AA zw;)!cS9Bocx3$GDnX@WI>~vU3*@$%QFPs!Vy(G@eJ3a!9^>M4w`L5jcON4GrMtMyY z?9qpEfYT|AV|jbR=C^u7x)0dDAeMV$Xl%OrG5)C3T%!Sdn}4jcv6P>!i>$PbVzGV$ ze_%Aien4enHNIKi&b1^Bh{z9*waB7dH+LMdfdz&*WmBe{c_sC?C6^=~ijkDx4EJEz=vq%ab0ZKkz6m zOIbia5owoaD;~JIK(isP5$j#- zusSJUX#8HZRbH+o_B&{|VBXWbZ9qkGM$)Nrl*|`Zw+a7jcNW!zOP*?3pM(2J#MPD# zwqAj6rm#BVqAL2x{1PjBb=M$awI1d*_zITFjLJov2RAa0Xf7+_pYsE8& z_!$Oi^G3Y1g3Kx6g~c}IgzPpVvpD0rgqM6ttd<+6RBjPEYT4bPTcZMvx6LQJd7tJ~ z5mT1*wVAEGSD_=&qqYytq(mo4qcm4n4hIu)0JkgCh0!9T-icHS6T71}XBtpfrFtuJ zFseG{AT95;G7qQH*ls@Cf1?+Ye(|N`@KhfHc&e#gNKxKu~pTABnqu}xbH_>KcTtV0e& zpU#urZK<6+_PZvN_X+!lbi-)OJskI{`Ph!}Q(`tIoKjYRPiS1G^&|seXL{QDW%c0Q zCbt?KwblVY^qL{of6=d@^yB?8nDkl<>oohpI}}c7n6*+MleT5z#+3hH439T0rJz^Gds zCuD(0DL5U*1?*b9sb3`656D=kpe)w|Qt06^1*eDEL>nqYe?vU&*Iikx{L{ByuN<=e z!f>QlTIUlDC3F!=r&je{@@AH!(VZKmRtn-mj;siLQfOvK%M*2$d&OH5($Av;AB+if zGwL6iO*+if-juqeX1bLZr)pSDgSx}QY0YFt?jqoO)vO`}Y4T}lqc~~#I!I2=W0j_^ zHMMk1Q4yS#e~C?aEmJBHpLdT^H--rm$?3G(TYt902zBb8(1TgzALUl0i z=R9CHqjtBQooIMF>~yYR_kLkg!$7zr#r{R~ z2PDdfCi35+Eds<0dKEaUG+$78M5!B0C^0LZr0YB1@#+(7Tpot&8Fi#v z_6U}pf22kHPxe8m^L%m_AmUEsyR)(sqX+f0qZc+FxpH|K(o_WqSIrS8KY-XDWTx zjH*H_HsC+(Nd@<&aM^9CR2yw)YOUI?73kddi_fne%bps;WXd9-dp@*JPZI`H;0Mfe zjeU&+9OQ~=nU!fO-Z`F7x5ui49F5hwVZTm$dhDjyltL<@Dj}TNWGP`rz61ora zwDOWdcip1bCU=E10Q(Crd&VK1iAcYUHUh zQM=QB0II{Z%3vhK;f)0R>QL!hdOKNpe_>`BCOd7&3u9lkhwj}U%oIC*BkktHQy1om zjJ+b3i!4>u1`CzLi;fMaOMT?gf%I9jjBx_88OzHPR|C!2GE_dI+2ZDd!{#@1#lmoW zviWs(;Wgn1S8P2J>GOLN%Xio41{^c)0K_MvtzK}jV@k)~)5^`1iBiXGgQvA)f2|ET zG`y`&EE#BzM3}-(W#D8%QU{Kvil#N1`?aN8G(F#;b-vu)wJsiciHV;*y-QNs)tE4= zbOtu-8P}Et*1|OQ{Od#`>5R+BlhLpY4btvN>yPURZN6r6N^7TJJ&%V-#zJO(sFxP& zYk`B5efPkJO%*8GYZ*^}v*{OLfB!m_idQU_y~=#9D_(@2g@VY5g``$qOKyiugsuy+ zgU38{Vc>$k#2v}_s#+!7p4ZMJ{+kK5nruaP(Xp)XrjI(5zj8>%L^R(NKvC?#D^Ja# zuDET&Pk^`-lgkKxSYz@ zkKV*;`#0`Go4L?85d~@RIsAjQ6hJvtNv@zYBbCPwqv;1Lm>})>-wYB0cQu$lU;dZ> z^Gn%~e?F=>1N4xfo6Oz@e;10`q2$SOUmu2)lMTJRRb0x`ExK)cE&6nhW5BEGgnhyX zDmHWSNDLFFb}fzuK_QT?Nc1s^neQEL6j|#tt^KYTN*>j1Mc0T+TJfA++QyAFxSq_^ zCL#dih8P>^8N!2$y_HV8l#>9_MG0f_shQuqUOyUl4U1nQzez@ye*^Ou%zOUM`jWN+ zRmF&Y-%_Etw+Mo+tBZ7XuP_{T78n%FE6GG#b0q*FW5F3Xs#i>Dgq??$_Nr+JePs6#t;c~ud|OU@_hw;t=~HU z3@C^nBDXN^MjC@ckW@5Br$sBfO>Qe)H5g1#i$^!Zk&OHLe><_a*qt5%q6U=GBBcvD zregb$3YY#V2WsgobyQrqaz=6)7cPLZFX{|jar&;^a)4H9ir+Fj+MOm4Sz~AVKr&^B zsFQxjc5u5WG#l1kcIb1YrO(boY#45b2R2`ubz^5evTLAki8K?weG<;5d~hJCBPV`! zDj5hL=~?cme@ubNK5#ZGpNU{?$--ngPw!fS5lWz0)mFDh9`fC<} zXjt{yV2C!6uFlE9%N>Nj-L`f}jVGj;6{@R;^WdWQH!!)IjUgXm65JFj8BpSjVMG+j3$fDb1s3YTXk8e+pM)97_(9$-K6bcZrrZ$^)I@ zAp$h+mWMO3$_5)uKZ|fltnhm6`+yp#b)v3u1by^%Z6Aj8-_uhURxm!lbr&GLqXILO zK!4XP^x-|Xb@B-jy^g&2cif&hfHb~`jyU`pqb#7ZOfnE{g zxj%UAbMWhoXhm&!QNR3x1#rgSG@*hE{;F}nd=zYMe(ccpIzo`=JSt9;z?aEAM zUZd1F=?Y~ime6Xgk(4y1V6 z_ox>qIH+EwLx=PQ5f!_A_oJ57YJen9RPiIgxiNDt4tgj7kez} z;o53q>7|i#+oe-St+c~@R?z{`50wi023Tk870lH*)Y*hw2qOp)S54YcCeHAkg3^&u zf0RHM3T?rs^tJnI956+ytD1AHn)Xyh_Kgp#69B8p*-w)Hx0d0%{*R zith}%aP6>o#ldIjrRxxszAIx;wbLFAUD=+@se}GYCRXsH#s3If=iR@}6o`VjyNt2Q z)C+U0RK6(`y^vwDYzRMUOeMBipcdS2f198};rW+ZC8Hp3Od7uTtBRu&*f2Mw>;#aQ zgKEM-u9%wj1rq$Be!IB3wT_gFMy;eAIrhvBXV2i>+vgez^!!h#rE?AOjm!5Gk4ve_m4<2O%xb{nF$vG+2fAE(B znNY1hh2@)=?`882D_JgUH~6v5mVQK5Qhk9WBEl&;`){T8Jk;a=?KoAL81 zf6H@H*VrFPb;^ZLcJtXYQyRDZe=~n02o-e0yy1nBxbt*=Fa5OY)*b$^iC|{^nJ-|m;#?E)+Gh|a7(p^SKlhj7 z-9J~V{2nRauDKu8M-k%sf4AnTX9O7&-p_QfQ=Nf4Zzu%fSGa6vdaQ|xLDqy)h zxt*R52iv{Q(67GKu8j~q8|WSc=K`uKJ-L?d78gRSvPp74=EwdZf6@!VU$Sn<$=K_Y zap~FLG4w-2tT)2sh2JnM-I`Eu+vf_^rp3^u6HvU3bk&KHdAsbIa(9EqZ49}BLDR#W zmA;8{;8|AqNlm2*_7#G@iT>6Bde!&MitU*lJkGegh3N-{zo%gO5e!}OFe41lXl5k@ z9t|FRUe|KRdg`8|094JIiWBWlN zLO|X@!}^QO-((r|(n@b_aN|R|q8c=@Rry9Ogsk!r8rwNRgc6#58AxF$FHz0Mf9GZl z;v&W$(?l<n7@;qorl9!gZ@OQQDk1(?tep*B=-~+6hKudIaFqR59LnH z=O6*E5>Pmw&~lZ0T28uc;j#3m&V#-xwqj}XlqcbKe>J5BWaeH8++#EInvKxV>p3`_q53ZdZ`ZZ+>g2~+;vf#Zotjl|>q__(<+)els z^+9LTGV?a#i+WLL3!^IYi?o&>(pmKndcXxc1SsOm(sdyql1b7V{)ZYnWO2|D(*LTW z&nATPf6rC0q)~ABPDwztnVU;hoH`E9Ru!{p;Jgop5G;FC0O9XW?N;wayTg2*xIG0L zl&*Gh%#QZ%SIr0a53l=FUtxZ-6C-O1DY4XsQDT`;CQe=FH#bMJyhUo09SeKn4IyiWaSi&JJc z)0`uyuF&8UChK&SAN9)Am*KPd0_Wr^$RrTEH>HGZIkE#uuod6nv5;g@ta3CwG$B7w zTgN>_3iD)^ZdOHa+rUENSW>&M>v=tee^25q3G7)c>Fj94aN&dZQhl> ze7S}`=~sjb0x!~W90cr*deYQp+8rM&{}n{UiU-Ho$q7OpLQp?=h1@$;_S?F0BjfPB zuy?Ix)B9r1!)pI2u>iDXFs+CgjcNJIAw&DYX?{xH~$mbe>%RH z)y?1E+~Q+y*X!ze!f8iJY<0Af4N5A-?Z0^1n%gt4Yhfd6PV~tk{u*ytDt>GpZ^5}=U%mX>`e%LO~Ffu zs@S3e5+GaY<0}m;*E|Af8lko;f2{3H*C$(K7QwJ@*-nhG&FnkW=A=Dpa^1v^L=HP- zYP)-e-g$TM*`RIaza+5XWxeq7Ea2fhLscM<@ z2{#YR9&#q~j-h|0|771kXoNa$l|NdUT9>j$oVaes_ApOw!Uuy}`As1Rj}&6bGB8mK zd^_y;W;?Or0c$P{^f8&Ut@k&UcQ;rpHuWvw3-b3Gd#;Q6xwRdwIXX0;?FAJM? zt&^>8{r7)bj!x~lBm)lq+!9~A&PO)E=X|}vJ(gV12&eyGQS#dORwGV}&W=RC8syuq z@nHErnB%D?!1ZFkj@vYOAiO<=Nkh6%TRHRY$NKQlp2kXT6i=}he}K!eS&utqPM*i? z(nP^${@MZV+p}&yxjy;`K2fJ@4a;WOLbxPm60t+>tXYkiB2vTd?k+SPkM=3IX?L)l z#DAmFTcQ)L^%e5;$Lw~yj2B$x8wOpP zhDDsF#D_H+t^TIqvfYIppmx82}sOWUoq(J9`gQ*oiz56gD#5@n@`o0Z9; z8DKfCQ>e7qT(dyZ=_BH+dBVxj_`u()(>bIXWBo8UPnjlUe;!b?$z~!ITOZ?|DhI5` z;fxIUNji(S00$bnAbqbpu^$KR50b9i*jWe@1e61UYTls;Gh@KomC=Cas2q=Wfx=-9 z$QF=3QdsHAk+*bEa__B6V8vOOM!LG1qFoRO=zIp8YApa$Pd7!_PKWeG9%P<0sO&Dp zNUwLBLOZdE>3gV{e%2<@7giHUQ@9Q?{W9cy_lJXwYR!|h@m5=&v`hoE z12^PEBN)i3+q~ThefXGjMfm3ZxNEk0_-fIZ9U~?$e*~aW*RpXqrYH++1~JMmc*dXJ zb?K;}q@7yeL4#QDvCtR8$u_+O4x}04|ZUph-lAatXc5@px5GssCuo*xEzz zExI3;ZkX+vOQTnnV=8?qOi16V?>9rLG(+f2$NBDZXXux5#v#!$2Lw%OTWa53)DR;&$7TaC*f%?7f1t zIDA;od{WX~6U{jYV_-6Kcc+iKwj-3jvYeExwb8h8f>$l@HKEM6DidNqJC(?Gsrr?t zh}z0p7sC4C`k~lXti*$CP2SN3*ti-e~bliqkr=98f4?x~3lS!MSv-am9{T!Tk+0et*?Ipihef8=YP=`d z+kzryO_Xst_`n6&)qaPSR5IJ zf89DAq&0dc`NFls2*I{RudShl15#`gv^Ky~+oy+^vWo?!qIE5yiIrY%xBf=x)=j`Z zT(Ov@Hk}m|g7~Y)tk@1@pPbQZm?QB=8kp*?BRs~s#eZU5R>9yR1<*hVw1jJJh|nJl zu{kz(3#SKTLv!#TMcbJEfLtXiCOO~9e_FzsOi>3#Z!B&u`R>OzY4Oo?Sadu)dgGo5 zXjz>veD4%OcJffI)BrF!c@&Nr&Yn}Y3Q)>(`{)59}k=t zo?Rv9Qbn%UqJ4*by?toSu=)bv{3q*jQ3{SU@$6P({jN7D?wfyVS(4Uj0THO>fBI<5 zB|>5mW$#q{up9@cr+cg2KXaXJ=Fn~dT1qo49ovG^u8BS{3ldLsfOJs05_?4EVFnD* z_2Y}h+Cs?s6kZN}C;N`soiu$>#imF1ET@WWEltx~CL!Cj2*NtC053q$zfsgt2jcxe z^%OBxxZf)%0ZE@^_SjLfsOvp7Z8WX&nt$KO|Av2*w;tKjMq_1d&VjK;eN>4hr4smW z*D|UvAOx1}1e?N$RP+V`ElR^pEO00{W>Sq~tq(?V)#@j}a%dMrC0oO<2rfkw-&4u6 zbpS&Cp=-l~JE8-?GMdt4tjPr;t;r*FpM#p7p2Qdh9Wh$cWSomeP-&qbxD9GHUVoj2 z`6R0jv+Y(pxGe;+IK^!}KhQwDTfFskgpylr~dBd8HF z2+G1GLG7&e;>65W{`h~0F45Q4aIm;HS(8Po;a%HX^WcidOQCkJ)J<)cE4{4DAOxVi zYim_gF!ln=A~D{QW=BfIW@~3St$*llxo=_g+t0ba|8YmWc6!VGA}Xx2(dx_J-`8C& zXBNF3nWm%-@ei+#(#Vvv>+2yMf?az{_K$8j+fFK6D0XtKflqiQPEEfi{5W8C5-DF1 zkTwU&I6l(-4wkxX>-6uwsU`7uEg3%9FiWrj+C6FoavPY-EcW%QQb9$>z<*B15{;Hk z-Km=5U8R>kwbGiRT6}PymO-sz-qS5gk!QSbt~`w`#R2NY@<(KuWC`wv9c+KW2NvdN z)4L0`F^jB(UDv&bW_DqRZ@`E0%0JN&V;4UCS>`mkNZrp zcR_xR!?mZF&ea~LK_>|ND1T>VDo5OL;|=B@HBle9?st=(Ncp~pF^p^_6%yt?%Erlr z25!-fm19i1t-J`TGP9t^Gkg@bqcu^4UTCLuS|eN(*uU+#O~;BcSr66}CpCSKu5J2& zR5^XI`CSxh3sFiU=_pG%TP2+mnC#j&q|G`(9=9 zq`S1Q-%9_9pLnRD!?YhBn?6s{uG(qIP(L&GggV+XWwdcY=5psc=NrhK@-9oT3EzDv zt(3p;>P<~uTDiZn-P3cMAj^eEA5`I%o`X=)tcF{pv4y19E4Mp4@mlYv3A4OxkQ;mH znkwqAS>xR~6`on+t$&!Q$s0Lw)UIB7%CmlN-zS>477Rf3l!q#n;wxF6e59-rb-uADR#lK6QMOD987P-$I0JWjm$&#Y%5(CBo6FK<5& zXewRpI(reBkROiTP2>=^_BVXD40BzTOK%zT_{AKgfwdN`9e=EKr2i)LwvmNi)0AlF zIs)GA;8xU{z!m1roS3IN^RC@WA-`+K*4m#k5~^&sYTzaw!glgM3_Ta(p&r8k-wi1E z{bfn}0Et2_5qc)~BjsuLW4*_4hFfLjmF>|M-7dBXS7bXlWKKBOEs0mv~ISjtvMk* z`z0hk(v_6MTe5qe+KSPf_Q4V;zn1>Hz4!9^W>d^nuxi?=MxRvlLR#w7h+M-~=Ms02 zx?aXLB13IJu(>w3?I3paD&QJF3`snuvkcDQNHWe(vVR@PGMSXY1%nZR-#paYMFkxU zo55(VDq0y;30nHyfW(At+*GXKy`e$)G;*VG6%1itd*p@kHpQq{A^?PYX0n}4sVW;^V;~yKXy4#UsSiXH8T%<*2hCrp;r+>HkFU#Hl^Gx1bp1MTomb z03e*k9Cw1Etky7ds&f?;tcLOMfPmEeRK<65&Z?7R?iFR_QH?Stk6NqD^&$QLuQq=r zd8_gx#E96%8PZ}(c_OrcC^h+N+y3$QzuNp-jeoFkPUDroQuhdHMo`khC$oFQk|?3e z+iH{jBIXtOH#t1v@J|1lU{$DCDF-?tks)={mCBpGK_}tW{7Q6Iirkf_JmS-@IHHvH z0Es`tI5ylPzuH8r;y000t8MdeFUhm)7RuEJR1B z6|HLuT{&3HrLH1a{n|nAFD`JU{FF!%n56fu*=G7EOdTDInSHQ_)uEj^mbv7i%BKC^ zl_p#h9dO>tLZ_1^isZxF~c}fjoUV?(B!-FG8N$L1$pu zq@!KXXPj~KG$ROlzG6s7S(vx9?6d=CUsiAM06%FV>LEz&P0QMI6P0F5CTrjHs+M+c z+h2F{Cs?kkwzITdnSZ#eOxtTKOn-K!zN)R|A}i4!Az?X9N(ynEH8G{>Hvw{|4QNx~ zHok#^W!*3$<+kEtY2)s-qD~BSwMrV5=RVrByN0sifn2DKIAC7@V%ALa-S1!RP+1jV zgsKRy7&2o?2Z1{I5P9y(|C??6Bf87WcPPMhVhYewIVs+r>~jJogBe*yYvkS$eHfA=r;aubeW-v-uM2w;Ttj&x5B813JL zM0o|SS9h9Thna!V3Lt<1GWrd1r%LF6xAi@b{Cq5-FpKRL37dLZDcWcWV;0sB=q{3$ ziD8M|Ls!?L%>Gzp%T6;2(0?><&*Ub4gr&aw5yud9ho!L&t;ZA*MlyPk{ve6d6iN z4>0(N%9-pxm{=sBcVlS=~iUp?y~-&rBC&vw59|>VN)=DJxyH;R6KX zT_^Tx?MU#Fg16s)|G!?Bb6@-QbT5Sli>{tXCGDC_5?7T#>3&ZNbH=bzdPKMA@z=*@ zxz|_k>s!gIrzf1?uUU)8W@FnA@gjI3H~s(j2;BWQir|{t9*b|BBMPD!9U95j#hf-Q zkyo99p#T{Zk|E*7s()mk%7|-kFpdb$xcx=m{3*6aF-O{EJpT-!9jTeFN!XD{qQB<$PJW_4GP_3>>Hcplyr1QD2%s=TZ2cknDb+w@tbS&ziE#AHvf zx2s78C4iV@c1s)by{UFQ<`c50o zmLU0lk#(d;jf(^v{*ta+zyWa~>{_$(YFFl=*93d1(_Iv~)6m-x?#Chg@EQ8Iv(ZZpS_Z*YolDD+`uJ}bcpEgjjn1|#KgFnzu< zJt15n`+Z#SC0I_^<4*q@^6i;6>8A$&nbv43Q|w<6Jw6$LE=xd7*`|}tBME}GxtvIO z;ztsOIe(A9LZxTovvRQ@QMaJ0mVs!fzC}*RV&dB2D-{Li*q2S$f``I)=W|h^cD#if z2&=n`)0*N`0}rl7B@HRVQILO<>O+NZ&%L$IF;d3f?!hQbIoB&QPmr{EJW9@w9OHJm zC!us4o9xKCRRx`yU`f&06bZm(XT1ecGlI9NvVX$YJR+tTn>UM8l{n}*ytM|*{U`_> zC1^=@aulXq)91}p5ukjh{7}LVK~7F@1=-fG~q^M@j7DxE+z1Af0>%(&~R+7q3SQ#!C-S`634lNmj=~Jwf{$r<3Bpk%GlV}& zOsFmv$-rY>-hRwe{i<9`L4dN5I1w-%)_*I%eO8B26D=*9RKsO*C+N(&#N1kzgaR}% zn%WlP6N;RB!bZKF=Z5`>uFlD|HwsUs=ZtS@B4l=|-Y9T%1MHmmsjO(PmAxT7Kk0+@ zihSUu;ox7!`ISPV1EW*Z2}9(m5d}MS*Ix6#6Lfb^gA%1ZO$NJzg<@;DlzY~;U4OTv zgv?tRd=YHbkqE4aC-Vun29{J`Qk#D&2{P7*azcx4t2sn-GouM*u#x{|(j(?10CpSW z+&R9AAWL5+tg2Pp7-x%MsZ`8mqZNTl{O=E5ZvN@htFMr(n1!H{0adI}??ZX_RMHE% zsdUc;0i%`>8|_EQ)K>4Hr_iU`34bdH-e(W*eoS@kz0TXyaobMh%%*3ME7~dCNa^IY zyT)PQX(fUDMCBYlC$SSH586bUEa%bQJ9Sm*StS)Yqe%Ikw?jIDw{p#UY3icO-`*)7 zTLfFJgkq;(;b~22?ruspAO>i(=9O8eh?s*W(}#{EQ7BaxsOTK?M*pt6gRqJZg(I2?RN?$h>bdV8*b-jTNV+lU}CIxmes&J~;i~ z?HfdvQ_joQ{kZb|RFh=fk4XXX6H`NdYGKt|!!=U#M4al~ALdLzF@M5UJfG^GMzlKe zhPd>Z#Xd*|mf@$R*U#_%u)hpA91Uh3r2QS3KQ%`!77Wq&jb+mkrmUywunZ=Q@h<^p%N*{JsmF7o}hUDIdX2S&2A8$LhF z@++g+FS@V-N~3!?lUnGWe#X_I@hQcdhpy}vLr}5KtYGLm=+6f+*lA& zu6@p~)5K`67VG_7CU8#-JlQWX=+d)Qs5VN@U<1shVF`?5k852M&-$sA zCW;=UUACxDuyh@~_uv1opSg%$%&6xlk1Mg}`A;8X&GS=cJRsZ|qVyuCwj1TSO`6WV z`7*&eESKA5YY0iKCxP~g{gRcgsw z=_zgrKwg0mlB($wtsc&-XrcuSdOUYRw*oytOsIzbm}2L4B$-D)MO5TAg{Ygu5%5Sp57JF8TRu;SaX3RU0 zr`;g-7dD?Y`5*b}Q&yHNb8NSXoCr$U4`6Pa1S=s7wqADB~m3aH*WB~O|g+s9S)BB zHh;@Zu7~~s6w9*`4B~_IL8+4{mNV4#(=$?Jto0M87L0dem1}!aTr)P`uEJS3QtK6_ zOotn8u~eQCiq|A|p-!PJ_&*1$=w>#k`;vtT-~Gr|zY4nv<4VrGkv))nP#b)4UjM*E z@TQEFRBpda7`l*bMfa45$>zb#hP4z2A%Ep^eL&apJJA;ak=s}xS&0v%fLptg)>5+b z7WU;>(^mWEFEVRz;jZDf6DI`mgWxhxRpO*h(oLLu551d8JTaAP`fLqdAce2p+xWXa zQcDAtO;a{uIi;^5I)6X*HVS5||IX09*1j}hm||;HYc9&BG$xXW@5IDXJDR~>Re#+O z>`&8EE_|!wtt@B6U@Ih5F}unRHubF1O|PRKdE2pBHm^f7_B>Kvp{^q=NfVY-xGI9o z`J159k-@FB4NcqSj0=@-s(a0?#Ig>C(w7F_ng4>tPbk{pZ|yQb+`s zpoERpPoy;YxKk9z2p`d-Blq(?>VH)g3D;Ar%E|l?RDGfEl2vevY|BJRZKxsPL3nFm zmZls?q!7?rn%H|-8Q^(WS3F!59o=ksWswFWUDj}cJ1Q;LBP%sM%LqAeU#?YtcWjRe zOI`m&2Kz5Lz(Z7;$s{l>jm=TA4J7U@!;Wc@Blm5gY2ZcS6a~i>Yf)(MXMcVZhTbNh zh}OgwMWhVjj*X}R^>k6x_hym@RV{Tc1M<%oo8L*$_dZ{9>KiN#E=__1VT<`MU(XnJ zIhlb27aI*e@V5WX+dfdEZg;BvN$G6V1PG()m=c|KLetwF!5cY5OMyeZWG`P{vd3~} zB7tV;N1ow$Dz}XO;mF|OpnsaZv}baCQthE?NmWmVhSb}p#B)~(!XS8Zi<_>ToZXlk zz2wOvn~@b7P+B&2(lu`e#EtB+otJSm;`};{+vJ%-sEWVw!1k_`xzdrX)9=d^sXUdD z^=--XU3$q(z^D&wr7en}TdRN8IZ>kj&M}& znfKPy7i)yhD4AsklB8@d5g?PYoczbT_HCmHK6M<;uSRe=&e4Ez4*NW&6Qh45i_ZpS z9g_e|_Y|yk9DlQZJTpjBhPYTEw-d+LTqH4YL1{gg!sxWh!8>??0&pew=l*bomlX@bU%M0lL5JoCPm zX+Uf8gY2MW_1Z%69P0Jf3iO@Fs=qS%E?pN>A>MiIZ2LS5ntx1i|H#Of-b^fJpvdYC zp1nsC>cxV9(`#!?F$*FVBpvI&t@})|745s&SPK*GChLt9jU0h@&VER#cyq%kv@NHx z+MJS3^r0)NNPdtac>23r=SF1&f{aYC8)aiG^Rib7MOmW1z8kH7AYb+`MI@-ihY-L% z(goCj;CpZf;ezXaq}E+FHPh<_7-Nt08KJ0)?$*bl~L-!{47 zvc}JlfKq^Ff~A5W=&3wz9XQ+J=ZA3p5*R6Py*4nlWvVQ69z#h>!pt+YP=?anILDIDbKY@sv_6S8- zMjEz9qJJ7EZgo{;L~~#xV3M|`X-(nsNkf~08Ga(4kn;Dg{f-^K^zHztZF^|eoCKRK z)@a&mZF8dbjJwcU9mZ@+u2%BV_8w!CiZImWz^os>e=>yIn+){~2566tAwmrjF$f{Z zl(nY{i5a--UDPl&J??LZPUpF^!5(!C9O}_}bAMbaVXkhMiY%aZGHqq4WMtpYW1D`U zE~C0pBhc9o6x?#09kSOJlSVC4D+Rz>VR~R|QV{?F6peXC+gph>@$Zr1EBEAX0F9g! zVX;1KDT#N4r;zrH!1M+5S9(@ryU3KvWTz&`W*oFL&3N{h76qo})MAx9M7yp+-My#C ztba8K>rG#e+5KBS5BHLpPSd|>mLi539Xb{2guK&pL$XKW>yFKdRU7b)=|CU3PO@c= z*P*5gx^g+eX%4D{3B(0${B&leY7$R^nw@H2WRVqMW>=HR5Lwd?#q+`BC+)}om?3l} zfbny4E15GO2iE&aL|jaYVmC9Wew7n~Re#rteXhmf5WQpgwUgXs)0|bO^$GHu>zfZt z;2Blk2UU$tkzNxVI~2)QQBIJN2;KrBQU$d_Up^E(J_nWaA5CwQVl1^_Rq9U;;bta; zxAmCpNKa7PZ#_VV?*-t+%s`#%JoZiOV-&IN`O^tm;IAbvFxLbQS<#4YmI%60sec-y z24wC($O17fWH|?v5R)4LZefr%ibOwYVyc{bs9RSy&7Yb5?B*}{o(3aS2{nJ6&KE(_ zssgI~k+1PgCROg9*v$}(DE{Ga($yT*RZRF`!&*dpq)!V<7zygHv6$r@%zl34+BR4j zd`(*FmE?%jO(vfmJ@R~YDAJi?f`6J!tU8W5S?B_yjtQ#BrEY2E5pic0E&nG$W2pW@}bT zeh^`5DO+ySbFLQ?Caavx;NDP~EyBYcHM-1ZPsf~0>gdoer>JBw5qfDWbbo>2R;LQ0 zE@ywY(3z2Kte!cWggBI9=qSkFRJOe!}5M`0Rk}RW`cv4Gpe0D*oGIUeiuwoW|Lec=r z0}5*jN;@pYkiFh+mwg5eWHg>;16ztRa1Is&TA}HZ7q^X0<6F1T(tqw%g>%AjIZ&fC zMgMCDCIQ25iz$Ripo*JcN(w5SKE%Uj65A?MwNc?8;WJP_m42z(6C}7a%Sn@SHm8#u zi<@^f{9GkBayhXgshP&N!Cm7-OtnA?3AEx=;u9l@ZS)6PynppjAs}Z^+=B`#fE%H` zYQB#@=QoZL`*m0r>3;$bDNx9}0i21$z7CeFktT$0k-=3&-Ofek`)$1&jUnT@7;qN8 zKpNwTY3&6~2(E5pnZM)|iaAQ;p2V*t1m8us{Sh%tItiR2cEEpI^IB|vP%NoM8k*NO z|1G_&IvSB%QnG?FM16~3Ih?Ctv1P-=3i$t$R~$3RyFv;h6@QNc2`+|IBW6KiCZp8R z+(k^W+ux15|7=p?(x zjX4!o`fu|R<$u2z9K8ZmWAqh=q8*e&h zauVzB&5x$%F6Pf$m9TLPlW96_F*1+ zolbUauxfoA(@k$kzJHD>o+66Q81dc4Wgjg!jP?pRRqljI?x)%u)Q3^;ylV4+R9axU z$htMCq~)y8SrrtwULqju$mC_54JoJ!73q*DRO>^(@`L<> zBTuf?cz>X(x~-WIj_iFwn9_)UShDOa^drJhW$Gj7izjkl3{l~QMwFws9R7>NW zc@$NWGWV}0O@Qc5X@HJ$5qFHFLaE96Fx$Wxb$`OvqB71g0)S?+0emPVRZbAuZFiKLlh4F`q&}XV;d<8reOB-W|CizYQQ3S=Z@ok$*123OG#teCDjqn0o?pi9IC=xSL(T64T4L z5<|@~m=Bt>J~i^bh~3BN>`6cc7)lHDyQ3aIXhV53?l8^?U9J;ZwQA!PaD2r&h6aed zQCc!E7A9y_EN&$`2iI%RJ~Gqd*n*t8vkBN+?3xsG8gT&%L{l#;G@=^c%EdcY`hODA zHd;E9k+gh`uHD*4degYO)ZJL;5t*!;4$VjL}C?#T)IO@CTOk^?YpIOpzu8tNm-+V{hfj$>pkkr1s^-Q2dz zaHU_yxu6rwOHTzotv^;K;;V`&QwqRBj^;tkf)x>X&Y6^P3}Oxyz>XvE!CLEejcVaxZbXqasDIgTkmc4jm8z)nu9zsPo&#W}Ws? zQ6q~L?H;GBcVR?oU3zt{q*$+H6pgA#0CLQh%C41C;cs1@UmF1WA%AymH;>Ra)fcj? zpZyXP>EBiX(Zl7HiC<0l{I-9SCnffo#3HEi&$lP*K{AS?+Vyl$?_Ks!a)BPvRT@T@ zKFC54g*n0r@M=OUao2Xi>u>u|4|Ehc8I0IFlOwP{R)5Z%c2T%1ifY~bI{kLHN^tchy{A@%W zCK6)ON)bv~$xtXFX6MSm;dgSbi_Oz5xl;Pj^z6DIP+$ahk$-}Cx~r1PwkzxDZt=l~ zXJ^G$?tS#3v13=(i;OM`hJTa07U@7Bjwlp+v84hX(LetFH7I}-MsSD{+!#7A^h87; z?F#8}rGs+DZb<*m{aJNj5f+E6FMGprz<8BzEqDM;&+@Sh2kHH4L$GZ`tCEQq_c&)- zaWA0TqsYo8^nU=;Q9UdZi)NjK!SF1ODx-Q#3Gq>;hbok_Mc{bx90(<-W?fsjmFhSp zCET@cEo^cs)iR`hZKJN78Zg*P(woiPlg6faydWRaQSFc8b~+t8 z6MQwJx0bom5a!vYQSnF$Itzj7z-|nI+E^!X)|gVoqcW{%05LVWgRX8jW|v+v3&i_Y zjy^*!$VPGLieE_5_2&vx7R__SFykMt`{MA)d2i;bwjcBnn(8rzl?JZ#Mp1c?pRq^{ zuPv!{On**}ml@MUO160B{BS>(IG$Z|g6Lv1QS*4=(cZepmgxMtIfA_tW(Qe&Z#?l5 zK(E*-0u$|W8uiPVjjYW%$rh@FGOhdL?{8L$%7#o;=m%s=+5ggH!ogj9a8aE@>qc{j z+Ng73`i}#=y?`RG?^zc5G>lZ%l1NodwOqZ&Z+~by8R2u+oQNzeYmErwcyJ0FJ}kd0 zt1L*IXMa;3nWW#arYWSm@Fz{MDU5RNU{|v%oQ2yyEq4LYLu0odK?WS8MJJd6A~23i zV?53W+F5yPC@dF9iS%jDHr@hm*Mx>=r}zA#M*RZBcJ>g>FC~h z4S)3@s+Y8w^et2+Y=q}HKGl{sv?Wo8SUZeizq;U{DAQ1${qU^f*sQ=0rKH}cGVBwp zOs%Tigg#*4OdJFews-uS%~Q6&gjBXZuWNg{?mx08#z7xdiw0G~wtcV;sdtKH1qyZz zRCzi`hUQI(lb_`v8KdGVWPW}sVfg1jA+aVowpX=JbT3h_H!dbv*&-u7P>&(mqKd(+v zk|Z5TQluUR>8iG>Nm1Kmg-rxcpY%s+9zn5_T?+mLA!}B#x0D@NL`c~&Z~GJ-`+uLc zvwp%)%EfVCNU80)Cy6YYq`XFR)y5URK}wV}{*|x<3sJ8d(*Hoi z+UAM)m2QdZ+c_x7nx^z*mfr|^Z)n*F)!{8CM=Y+us<=frQ?gE>GK20y@_%~T!Jv?e zSbymdGP%crwq2Z=d$ziD&TcHF0T!C{_ zDMfL_;N;z`9gW9)f+Cnc*2G zbzhJ7ZC`g!IRPm60L~mP9)Dmuia|DKUGD6f(1TF#DG40vEvbRh*|q6Zl@DVx%4UpC zF1izKx@Oc`LzE&M1{5*J8N3T2v(exIN?UnRockJ-Rs}%j&M7{XA~fkvonOdGxOwiX ztXEknyY_zHtlHbea0VK)4i3@=`L6|XtrPyJd5>s+{y`6kjhraUPk&?Da+7_^Egqc( zK8<&?67VoUuBqv!uqsZ#aN0@nL2RL?f>(PT5P_glyC#_HZRE4ihPbZ@=1q6D?E{57 zzBT9ry;e}}p0u=x%w7G$woChK8SM`!B6wf-3pi=|e$C@!1K=gqzXnAjE8?JV8>_;{>1z#y zFj&m>gA2L7z8Dat`9+Q)%GWw+N}+R%3atE0Nv0;dV32!%0OE^nmeT2O1B|Xg!7phP z7GdJDhBonURk}7wcE_e`j&;7nFm3N)8xJEXxjhiQapQE6w13Kqi?PY}diB|odV;4e zxtOGldQ2#MjU*fFvi7c-<{;yE0;GTDqtS;KOIpWV{Nr2~{BzIC&;{5vVFHSV3lKES zS+1S3{%*A;)dVP!t?tJbY z?A>DH2rNhvl7CCuZ#Ft>dh@id4edF(oWkTnT3mXv3`dD6%C605OwfpWu&g-jS@uRi z5!N-(?0U?~x+=&_%9sD+zitLmp(hXJkN+mAeR?g6v!vI~7JmIim2`yv54&b^0yH|W z>Zq(?aTEbd^6$; z2rvR+Ccy8=k%WA{<;1ZmkyDt>XP5UAF5xMEj_*)`n+*yoTjkOZumW#g0j8(yiMBe5 zStQl(dc7ri#$WyfcpSZl6NuII#_%+i&f`(vt$!yA*G79wP^BXn<%XmKx&T@7h+yBK z$(VM`+#WjP!&X@uABl~2V-)qGE)=fJFd3DD?U`=DjdgStg9O*CTK@w*aJ`=sls%wB<9<4tFb6F^VFos8 ze}7izcVyEs@7zJ16x~DD>OXIxT|CvX{@unbzbaVOs29*VC;BHDHU$|_rAA$EBYu=2 zfB}*kJodB_=2oB`ezp|{nrcODDRz*XTPL0k=xKhj`8C9nrFc7iMBj8fF+tAm}{SzBrqFaPy zw2d25w!)`;VY7taG`UY*+~+&oOYb^mtf~R>SFY$&XyZ-BS24TjAinx$8QWdEb;%lx zlf)TMg{}G8YUV+N+9CLn?M`IlkkM6g7N0bHb!iAgFR|Nf3)$E7&nu zNC`khb+lo7yTw?e$sVi}%n2j6IY_O)tWm0tLABcfixwYyiEi_Fuj&D&O@9fMJ;|4| zB9FD5_|QF#)>~d_@CT|T3n7VWX=sip69T!Zi?<6eI4DHe((3$PrH`PkMGY&2-HK?E z0k*&|460%wiUgDjtho*N{X~$bd8;&^Mb(UN>uIYB!dJyK$z5T71SAIp`6qsB*+2nr zZR-6c`+73pyJj+(8cD#F?tji`B#K$b!8C(i4^owa)yJ1xP~NcCjvew;;sw{RDj!Ox zRePtdnGaEJ@1TSheip6_#}9ZPdGTMANL@yFK^&e3c_a$K-PhU>Iuj*g%m*zgE(3-z zdQTX(1RY!xf@E>+k-LXkxno~T$KbSK(*{%W26W>ao+x)IN8e?G!++pT;aflEHWKT1 zT1t{tGMc%H0SZ>*W1d1Um(>{}zK}sSEqgQ-O2j##)*Yp-OtoYy@T>>LB-;w%ZFEt& z6?+5nXXCLo)f=6JPc;%M$)PxuZrGJ{H7#Id96m<2#)xE&gML6*v;KfUwujaj*op`5 z6}3PJx;xiiu|{vs?tiX-l3E=4jalP%IMg~Zx6c1{+hks7g$tcU4p5I83e(Dx5>0WU z2lo(;Hhz($PjZINkhxX9X3%ebudcxre`aXZtaVZaL6$9lXStQRMw7K*xs6oi$03q` z{MWTT_{ZJ6U;>}_pRCmneO&y2KmMBzsL^3eks7ELI#}40BY$O&J(}RQUAtKS`lK`} z`eyzNDmE&snr`K|aj>K8%Czk<=1Qj+H4JnbTc_;pF?R+nHZ2|G_aSO zj+_e8#VMa&Y|InjYDlW@no)Utk^B_g(66^)EI*#t!kmpxmldNF)jDqqNTJMiz&)bg z1>dY?#Z)dwN`KurJKG9&lQcscW7{4yjav&SNL`o8{`RPv8x;9du;7s;mK-pEFRG;4 z&e2`WepRuQcy$5`%i^?hk2B!U$VYG(&AA7zmT{k|j}m!N(D~T9>vML$-q!ul$Hq3` z#mB}a=Bbo76)A>!n(v%1GnLS`wE^I^4za&*PPo$X2!9%)NX@z>YXoj|mSt!srFlzp z3Z<0A#Yzo=0-4IO_`4rrE7Xv;`{O=zYYXqw(%*Vzh7eL8SApjupMfHcxAoe`{p5sP z!6ps>$;#%sv9r&)S(OeL!#K8;?UZU6`C)ntKlb(L*2ijSpF=<(e5(~q0i{-uJSnz7 z&6?^AK!43g054|K18)0%II47-=GkLHS8b=T6yhe@{nJfHO9yP0 zqemCy_iFB>ZB{J`BZX7h`EDh{`i6;yB6u^`?0-aHU)&1rajX`!W3s%gpnxxj z9DK7O0f0m7xYc((DZ)|RD zHGkiC%g{dI%UD`R*KR^4_5DJ!=*s!M!ctb-alj=ZY?_tHRs6vaDzKey3zO}*6{I2U z6o%08FQzha0l8U2-q^Gsuv}AJqUWK5n2XjD=U4e_1>Xw}1B#-FFGQ0E-g+5*KRvHlSx3kLu7WO&$ ziEjU~9WJ%&gw$5T+w(A&m$AJaq2iP#y>K2&R;Xg7^&sefuW zM`{n+OtFPn0PNZ7Hu>gsQ&Mij)X^S8kbyX)HF8i!G-RHvXQ2uk>Et}L$TOz}Fabz4 zKuu9v7UR(Cc$GD49s{MPrDnF<;g!VOR_R@VA>e&{8L-3}4lYi^tFj_2n%$F&a$UbL z273-u*L`bVph`fu8o%dtYJ7?4Nq>`QO}A5ekppF3F~eL;I@ZFHod+j^DsfEuaye@} zdBF@e=d%bl32lwh4_x;@Yu0C8Q3+Yn6uh8SII(SI9 zv~f-Bl`%&x1Wz{I@>cNT4&sB-qjxe@ItG!{11th*+LtSB6XTwUkMIjWxg7ug<`y4wd$PBGGxS>ntuG$NHeX`H zrP6VJVDes8N1}yOh<=$ISAX@iHK4PU__PZvl9w(XxA`0QzUN#JXE$u681qHK5r=l+ z!r+Kd*Jd*E$Ok!-DK|>jE=!gRU)-Cr?qioqo$OoV%WKJZm9jsoboa)T?D$#1yd~EU zWEcB;_F~aC?3z5%McUw9yfQz4ik$=+DR%|7C@Q9%K-*R%h_G9X27ek)8@J%Gxmsbs zW0pgODYWlIc7sWbdAK0m{Bh*!OhxH-#+g4cs zhL$?{JGvI|XAtp_7=IS}{Asn`4vKJ%>-KMkTvVvsB~C(J<*%$OQ+HV7$h!OsXG7X_ z5hw>IXliZ@x@5^?SV3ysXswwlwqXQ2YFOddd8fs{Laxc?4SCEESQHtftYA~=%c*3g zi5E-}<&}_QN%vy*Kl?i4(A1PuWv_UXMP)G6DA|*`D!+Gq;C~w1o^;l&I}N{Pb@M2) zNFTh0BwtkgwVw$1%Qn5W4&q_O(d(D$;bHNeU(dOunR-w1#;Lb+~N3$J}8W zK{X?Yt+HCgIA-$=muy@3$^EeBESTB|8WhGYm$Th_WxVcx$3 zd&u?-lclCdLVu!e(elv*@8CnXl%thrcu(RWl_cuvQ6l}=vQ}3(9LrpMWh27B+_U(J zVArCd=!ft9*qU59L{Vy$lhjq`$`|i`d;_LcD3N$*Wm=x{_Qp_cDI!FzlbJ|s2~qc2 zgzZdEA^f?C74|?u%}E`zw9TR~1(+Y&qkU#oAa-@{et$SN8NlfLaI{b`Z8|n(+*Q_R zfq4c*I-Rs}Kg$7qD|)nOG8dazSy!Ql24fYl&8pIXi^MYpMXK~v5Z5r_w^iy!IobRj zWFd0K(3tp{@3XWPCztq^j9#7)@|Mr+Yagb^t)~~CXDD#M551>2yYT2vh;g`oQv8Y? z$u1Ux+J9Bd;=n2o`+^%mtxp))<@qV66(=dENGW-1MT%GL1(bsx0Hr42A|sc|Vt*D5 zTM5?cJ3_x8V%-M!35}BbYk3+y5Ctp0uuY*&i`Iat>S>0VmJL|w?^ejW`~rwL!o?MI z2)-5J-gj*wE*}?s)`?1y<(EL%Nihb63N9aAlz%Oco$R(%NQs53zG~A4j-LXetc4(m zSePnybKI0;(}YbdnO6;9$*b&yh>G=` zaDUdII)aO1!^_|b?s@ds-lt@+fp1*!Ovt(xrnv}Yq7g~9ttaO@tt0gwo+Sz)dDSb? z&9oi98r9|o(dJj{F>O6VTqOL^Fy=0$m|p*#{smQM(13^>QqzgrY#}lvU4MYpqW`dC zmMzO{9HB3*yc#Z4p9o4(QEZ}(rkuORzJJq_i#EC*)gfhJ=2Y3lX=RHe<8>^DIVQC} z0qSYk_L2v*Pfp+meNC|UiAr-i_*(#Dw9_*WaJVEJ(N&tm zN{;@&&HMxkK!@{`{bjE;x1uOmVZ9i4qzj_?)+?$gpdlFJZOVpa*MgBo)&YbaU4MW& zfCjP?l#5uWd|F^I2T{){DK)Ec6|Ng!h3SYC>TR$xZBz!dGrK*xKy6a8qgzol1wMB* z_3MayQ}S4>5(>|Ivp}7Qq+4LQ28l~ci*7#0fQeD*&ce5V5(r>OGGm z4!*#=aB3v1K}PX;`(Z3-75PKMbbp#5zH+wFZc?*Svwc>Qu^IfK*2Va6j@ zd3wZenJdjFY$?1ab@lUj6BJ}PT|DUm$Ffj&jQZA^%!n_p$Q?t`^LWUuK5U=?UN@_5 zZw8E-D*~UsV3E}6Tz=`_|4AIs(9hT{R9rpGCym4s&O`*0FB!7RK#zDH- zC1^;d=rg>%WQ^@R6%z6Cwb^`2t6vf`NOM*nVA^41=1e=ojFLnC6htKe0@lg`1rInQ zA2I;F2KfpS{?AAzqIMtio<;+JjhT2i(NfchQM-d-t6=jH>roZKZ9 zTnJg%_+UIR=me@yD=@4Gr~jLL%8^3BEwfzzTL3kT3aCa6m|r+>}sFs1wnnbX`K zh>fRgHa>-e|&l=l;>C zH`ER7&->H5QqTX=idota_s4AIbd2kmJI*{-CuhX1Fk1e+FL6a3I?gH~NsGml&vI$O z)!PSE2eXz+F-MOcWo*^SgwN}5+3mS6A!m#4Y{>x*R4P;}kAE841X6b#+aAm=fqr3I zy62H>Lmd{5>Mzx~C{me2&;D|NYe*`Csy!e$VkJ5~reOG}EYx8UHb47xyGH%jCngk{ zO8Nw#ptWg5!V{aBTV}7_b<(C4Xix1zo#{_OHfjCdSuCVQp3UEjvCJOotHpaWX58MI z{t4q>J3Z3d!&S9kt}G)&j#(&9hRlgQO7*kGqR(?#%gN!fucahnv>ya@4|h%~CRs9GSE)@=A-f>w4WBeZ8C5(>0`q~ zRb>_77=HnS1=#F*JyVE>3-oc;tO!=eU|(>JKpmhS*|V|*wtj!Co3hJ*&C~FhzZ9oYFz-9DD#%sJAaWM2r-In`Sb%6NK<71ZGB}>9nHG+ zW&=TkyL)ihxVys!HV(mp1t&Oxkinf0g1fuBh2U<%LvRZY!5u!%ckit_@40uT=Ew9r z>sf2MyZT30^?LAVeeg(h=T5$2#_w?0xh$gGhABb^4-$55NtKVQXlNiLfi->s^a4>6 z=82==S8fuXb&s7|fb{@X$+O<*?pR)g!Q5Ub4$q=n;&17RW_s;C$;`?3gkwzTm<^ER z9NN-xJUcZblXX!HTLaDVOHpjVyQ8+`3uOb?X1P!^&-kILzt#OH@Ia0WQlB>*nQL#k z8qi|s!9A~&J@jTpliQgzD!<&BPN;8>!MMdT=M0nz)aB495?k^>#fze zmN{dgI$E%tK~6u%O_AniHB7BfK1t}HMoh-wH~F|!0Np!H&#=JPn4O$9;|tX-ZJKc| z!6e`e)M66>!o-tIE*iQf(N!d*VgtF{hy!>x_!4WQfZrnQ-`=)eU~CQ4_O4meI^^W%`l~{t`9`a{xlgetY=RroZ6dwPvl(S_X(CT=Cbx_qACG!d(h#tpU2KKOPu@( z?zzJKG#7L1bw9JEp2>Amh##~Ez&YrKC8rfsO zq(SV_m-9sTMp_KyJyVPjs}?b0HX^1um*64$QBmCn&DTsj`hM7GKlPBxBVC)2`WWqYDoYq2 zaW0 JiYO*0+s-0RQ7AuvAyEf)Xm&E&FN4N;rR|Y@=uw*c$vRwRdy3u*#yWa`bx; zaw&v9W`{ zy!Ek_`_+lDpms!G3;31ZzZBC{+x={9i!x+I!G_xhJd|u=f@^s?NcC_}i4d$0y|b71 zEvcGJ;CL^j1QwF&XK$5-xV|*_lZy;M4l1LlAXd4GhB-Z*5@-oKd~NS&ZWDJYnY>$; zJB*l$rLB8O*W+sIN_n$lTrAm@zvT)Cbiovn*G4z1T>THtFd`}3IwRkJKexxOKtgwAwqkF&Nqa3Q3dHh@jVZK`)od0>5kPhzhzI#Y!@ zQ&(!igsnX0=p|u$X<)jtROq-z_mSFGsX(??jd#1rLb#|qaLVlfLMNB@87K4(JkZ#b z0hrUG(U|qd*bvWPsWp+#pn%NGP(LL~i!$|9EBOyxR+!{UW{& z%uP*Kn-(w${I#ju$-~Rz!|_%e!dNCMC+@1~H8m;@a8f|~ymG0aVLoaJ+IJqo6pmris65y8Cg3yHyMMd!)1|H|K$G-xk}HEAU8R;M>nULAb5cC8J|_~m)`OB+l*-T#c`kTv&2Is=za|A zOwIeZXiS&r_Mr-N<0ns?WyfTp1S^V2I5L8mh@b1I5ty^wic+mP75U9z*7{R#fI~Nm ze1K>EH~Vz4Tp?9XuIRwkw-TNnWXWKapWm2x-x`Y`-CK?r%5s|C2c92+ zB&VdOhN>iU)Hi3~tFaG}(-q%uf5Yw8$L9bGKN56o8z%L;yPm$I{G~vf{|RI88V-PiAl=phO2PusU1>y-2`iUTna7#~2 z7HolB^s2Fk3ujB@LWt&&J}be-$h?yLI*&7_T`*O@(%g@3id0pI*=*~;2~eevfTNjG zij{x-dyE-c@80@1@d6DG|IRTM72zlzy>uZqt&fd$oSI=?_)Bz6<3*m3O%hWYj`JV3 z;|vNNt>&z5N@JlbX0I)=FzTwW9tmYmJ3orADYp^A9oF75{q+gYvGxp^>nDFKIcG#A z|AN=y?1RrL{!$kP26JCWO#_UhJ70UWUY^mW*VN)P7rN&zSoB5Z!LU~z(U3TD;QI?2 z$>Ke24fSuEadH3b%iPnGD=TAPr!G|Bc#@=Rx&GLy*?&l}oh1SD?&}XO#(6Vryk=Ku zxK*K$A8|-=$=1D_nDDzQzhJn8=IhX1j?7Ypy`#SM73m8L+YmgS|{ zQZ}zG&JpXEU2m|M8JEJ9Ni2H#JW@I z9u>Z%89Rr1iy=(JcITYR$Pl=A`Xe6vSz$>yK{v{XN(Q$JCSw=i)KY4ROS3pRIM_Ta zeQI=xF5L+4;xv@Kr%?hALcmc_F>IL!n3?-WvQNiMp#&;ifO! zc`V^#K`eE`02k@C@k3%Y)v{1}VJF~Es#tU0nL;?F`b~`=89-$~E+y=JkLbG@m(@m) zw<>sz{rs4<3&3y~u$P23?rvLB2a6fq{b=BV1JA5#AH-NByon%GRt@WuG6cosS_$gY zq&*r3IEk|3s1hoMYzo*2Ex}=D??p_<^6XF1^Uhc+Q1Z3n4X6BKIq-}pUg2u1ny^AX zF`V3{|0;jSaaoEpF}-8m--U!FirMw{9bJk&PT^;tA3$8G%R3^p3K(mCb5=oyU99N0 z;n$XFO#9uUGls6)dWS{y^@A%t;-Jz+nriYc`V;L$)@@eKF@=T*kN0dHRaz+7?@Ja( z1vRHO`HDDTmek08H5m+acD&1{C=RSg*2eS41?LxN>JT|F1JYV;h$+m~ER`s*;V6Tk zptu8m5-@D*gCsc!msGnvh4kc8EbitUsEG|m(WfKoGxi^{LukYkl+&TPlU)o6FebnPu| z!r%%D0VZaTa+9Q5hEU@<#UIx#SLa!dWZ%t3*5Dh`V7RWcbk3K1-6g+oCO39u?=U5C zRC?*OsGX*4{YvtfnR_)KZ{_+@%5LLsG8c%7Xm*3c=lAV5)@4aVL!$PU?pdh*es?F^ z2adHihR+(o9?-OzI;!nrJQF%>D3`*Ti5uCu+ki~^yFa>%9!u=Ksus9nbg6>Q3D|zB z3gSuoLdsAuTy{D^pG&r?ywZt0bi1|L6*uQtMIQg^bM;dXAt`be;=VxPkBX)TR^h~+ zwa4q{^tSP--*!QS*Aud<#2nYRGW^tWK;w^-P(@gSKUW0r&Y37r^6~(os={(ne%N)j zSJi+BNIF!s=*C~I=zeHM;S3#QCYJ0<`Wj*0#z(qNZ~=LAeS9+RY39wxc*sL%Gs<95 z!d$wzd4NlHbQ-oN@w^P)zR98*bJOd_iwG!xLWaiA4fZ0!U;gzBWqi!LC$6yqfVv4B zf@N8LC`(dFSv0|aXENB9 z;(5VvST1|%71lPA5IUYf6-j2>Ej>9aD!%lObUaMS{=fa({fS>(5I!2CAl&ZAcD94a z@`xZMWDlWTOZ*sRJwL{ z-X5;a*sU4}5UT7n$_yfU?AnT?OmTKAwFMl&u0MAFXqN24#iTCJBa+*$9F`njd4_&k zME!xxkoLH_kfC9HKtw&J#}d6USAfR8QsD_34e&*0HoF^p4ZVN!^y9PvI}`Gmt?+3s z2|d2@&&P&p@Laf2q5Pi=NA(KyF9(lwxIo#gK=fszwBd;`X7PTuUl8`@QgY;Y5;x4D8k!u7yN4v z%0&0+l(s9e%me?fpyc=C88xo%KbqV0UGTqC%KCQW1i%p9c5~&{)Yc3Ldf!kVC46-2 z>_UUfkCV0UZT#ewrB$F)RNj(hveSIFRrE^AO=Pr_T%Ymw=&5#GdZ68D;cR|}Jvm{R zo!dL=*Vy)$z7Sg3njyg04aO&lbVn`L_FQ;o;4mZa4M#;v;5{+I-J->zfIECS{rs-F zioau%+C7O0ujpkz!Eje+$YHcl1-1@qp{vtqeaNaLaSAaRrobL44S>-@Ku8;|4cTlPFLq1+SpQd%Seb>qi7dc_*WnEA5&-6f~$5Ip(aN z^XX7B;Do}I0?-_M+dfB2@9H8>$INycnN@I~ZA@*TOr9*biAO?Iy4b9+XBwgQc3DS5 zG@#Yd)qpo&?L!V@LW|8G^b9N)tl|OBvV&5!i8fp&{sW^>0Yu9^@1 zOS8SFMz@JaZucjF`uSv5%eC6b5!0aG%_QWvMjXL`%(8!4roHzh;cXtL!Bt2hE7a1N zq?Jt*=ggHb$L8QS>Tju8BC9js>Zun<^vU@kQVCy14Zpcb*je3%ktp#b(02%f`S)m% z^S2y8AAr%;G3|~okoYV))$fPf#o2q~=?>7%pluG$&mSWVQu|lDBD9}TE zzJS(BW*uQaNhx@51kBgexp{>31#EG=ffQ{qNk+1txp2sGhoi-l$zmLyXI0)D#?8Ne zzrR*ajOOJ(H7=m*x4w1zcJ6UVm`BBAMIP$F)DL)E$9QJTZ?0_HN#1p}lKQd9`ZJ4ToPdgO5jGOX`*J>jtC8pNlyUuL3;q7?K} ziur)Nb7qog0o7%j9zJ}VZ3$<2!GYeM@SYB8)QSKTMjJ-N)HfS*llJ8>NJ@IyhELP_ zt^{;$!@~zQpXI*;sIjFU9o-h+2ea-)4$};UnKMQTXNk@(Ck^?NH?R!bnjZ|KUWRU{ zXc;e>Azk7*f(MCR#QE%otE*#C-fI)SV;$LUM-*=|mqW{08pHcARl9+z)zFz;c}t|p zNFvQGmw11Q9*#29Dh-(yR^?3b#>OAwt^jJ1Mj~Ci&7D46TPxa283$6;I}A^l86th{ zAVcL@Q4iaTk|l4~*P=nLJXD>3F{IZUbmx2+w;_c5w316oge(&@r(L%-a>^(1_(H3U zSy?XW-BjwPQZqL*R~^S2_H7wwVcZWMjB&x-BHJ+!Au|x<4LY zWu>P=B%@nV4iSj?mRLrbW7(9B!U3~{dS*ia(sb|3C}uuKbhfaRnQ+y_rBYpNRC{qx ze$~kJXgZs3#q>BTh@OIBhmSc$F6+>Hu>M=14oBcU&6ptN)_ouIVj-HPe4 zhSoj%pu%93uU!o_*$@|BkolcY=gL9cJ;G?yMa3B9DEDsE0cdBJl;Cnf5-6|fSx8+e z!^K|Ms#X6W&AxtRQhn{9&y#QVY#a48W`fPs(DmoxtkT@;*kymd+{c*gL52j6-9}$b zL;@;(^Rm~vxz}OxdLIJ4k7k9+3fcNgmL$Km>$vF#2<#Qw;8J-~ z>jZyd#P5yfnA6}bO!4#Bh6gmr3L?O*cu9pq`zv4b8;9QnYSiG41@k2}N*>T&2_sch zrhAF6ej+vGv5Xmuf+{r?Ff*5?zKc*_i-alH4b{U16LhL{UoHlq*SgAShf2K7xyhTS zIP+Mx+E{Nv5%FH}*M$CN(S~0bZ2Cz+v|TzRH7FCoMOxsPf6=EkR|1%;F^LcnkuzPe z{dS=4r&0d6x_5s_U$D0~EI*>eiRltthFK_^q8&z?I5Io8j>|R;{ zd`DaxA!8fG3XPK?+`?DrFbn%{6HgPE$RB;QLWg6#b$>~3C|aKIKok1)(X0%e5-ts;f?EY1g6l<=?xe$N#Bzpo?%Q~Ha?xo(rtwBx8$|(~ z(|N;%tL%*bnieScI=YkMe?Fa|qfj{8{*l`e8s{IIqY}N2TIwF>rGXNuT&3tf0|ha2 zqW-#+*F?0&%sz-ARuRrSWZw5)fVdXV^~%O5b(|{bvW!pB>Q3aE$PPW#))tnD6hEsC zzH1o@(pD@e0oln2sST0!65oj(T)p}ghMQ8FCPz;4ZW0)k<6z-QQEEQaFS$RlLZzlS z87|)cdb3>PUBI&z(+jWcPQ)P3|LURsbIKq=RP_;C5dPh6rpn+K=D9fI0LieXiQaDPYu2p*I2Qb|6#zZM1Ef2(NtNk zMonif+b6`fgQ+f)rkKAnScA$+V=%IWuC0+Lj{}P(EL7Aj^a8e7OZPXe zBl_xfY6u*jp6ndn$|z{%w}+kvxdkB6UA}Rq{?)nr^9_tDqG^GrX!PlNn&fQBe%L~` zSx#-c<+Bpv*9fEp;xy)fNSqWu=7RhN_fWXuJ85hp(d1Ld6t%H%I^_@rpZh$^C=f-~ zwl5$ly@(%(EM$b|ZaIs7nv&g?>W&JA!xq~ckWTaAi}d6%t9k34j_R`@K#y8xB@Ycu z%MImx-_n)s%UxKZhX!#Wv|f*>4suJwVg4)k^m$+n2-q25c)A*ZjYcyTXYnTLW0es& zOAgSNn<7$aCMf(8u5-YDHxtN~ZcdKzKn_%oD2{Z>v4m3#80-rqvJ!-eFAENfR5Gyt zILp!PBjLMvmy_5kGd#VycAL)kAPfwaEBKC|P>o0gb7~{`{%jYgzI?BrrC8>_qxy(_ z2P>jLpni=WY<`Fx0RB@Lxio9TrL-t&l{6=vfvpYwt=_pk;%T1IpR2g`r%?0CO#;}J zaZooOy?6YT*BO9d|7En#qVNpP+~toJ0&L36WgpQ<`Na!&Nnlq+HT)FO!qlFKz|ju+ zdHtJ*_NqQ^)eT-8N2Bnu|JN#v*l8gNgs^!w zWrIT|H0((QO+5n9(F*%8CWep)+CBh<|K3m=Iz@lxl8OUayY0z_m#8A6x27MqQ7uGr zZ_9gow(Xb9(}q-Xg%-H@6@Rg(;(JW@gV0mnOy47p310Q8ReY3JfARAC!zipJ0;`%p z`@mni0KMwKgELx$ExSIT_ChHkFP2vJcbZ%&87*3n7EPs<@c`1c+OTC{N;+WIg_^J= zj?<5U_EIVftT!UoNt@pbMfzGP5lNgqn3C@-?j)hyEgD6*rXxz3EmLousYG z{B#w`vE7xzQ&JSlu_ft~`D(N54M&I9Da3e<$a>{#)9aK0W$1JTqauy=U4_sp5(_i( zoQ4j;f}tMa>y;j+_?1Shm}`Q#7j$DJ=H{xzqVg4%_4ci zFP%`a5N2dvJrkzLYnPt;TTEAKs`c@h1jG*ha^e3FTvRseuXm4beCsko_YJg!W^G@xYj$G>Fi@6VhbRGU^ zT<|OE_T%;swcJR?PV$EKw047e5N2gce7)TneT$0Y>AkngTPOyfWc^W3S|@ySN2{o+ z2YeyyP$^Qbj#^D8fsm1rLF>>YL#t`sctbc4XfesZ7R+Vz zuclfIt8IgqCJitMga!KdEA6G#!pU6S#p#19$GZ<7*u5O=|1;tG9LO)}1$6rI;Ql)p z#GQmy2d1I?7sa;AmCWwT$Dc10X#WU8OM=ybN#I|Ck{s*6q;RZB5p`e|(|>_R`xRGV zFA64KK-m8P8NUL7Je^!DI9x5=+-w}*yZ&Foww|^9s9&Iy$RH5@Kj6nmpd_t&Fb(i8 z7Rm8TAAy&UQ3((T^B-XvsQ<&__R-$*|K#v<7LE>lk!bQF2 zC*q`uYB0X`e~#C`PmX`~DundE8DECn-NDk)?Y{^SUs8iW=r1=2{$-NTy>uz){{d8( B@5}%I delta 176605 zcmV)iK%&3s&ItbM3Jp+80|XQR2nYxOqK$l!4I+PiQc+KXFc5zCSCGD!QqVaGutd$C zTw-)a<6A8^R)x~E-Pr!U1qO4vnDpW9`@Vj6*K0D{Ri(EDZA2|oMEwAHAbFh&S)}M? zImc7v8OvnO%34B-_F&K~yGXc-d9C45*9x>1U_56eP0Uq_*4C<+5X09{G2=UhbmXem z6|;XX)df+Ef3X5c7z7hifn_m*a4^9%ScXANZ`^rL$gh9=N#Ff~2ICU!5s47AnKp+T@Tje^NCMdBj+f?n} z<5E#_#;2W~@yy!GuJ_{*?ZCQTt3{k9IF3L`-Sld^h+pg5D;h`63)P50D_Fz_aPc+2 zU{6*Xu)YTu1qbC8ap%36BjjWUqi{)}RbX0eN8tmsTcq2zmvDch<<|(xqYUE`!QO*v zpt&+LobC7 zzryePjfKab7?hPsmZV8``5@%u%g1`Td|us^MKsZ@!%IFvdPMW8YRimN4V84(78qt3 zA+p)zvf5OHwgi7LtqRJ}H0>DucG?F|NrJ=q5&ZVplh}geDJBe^O7^a8<2WHR5~L@< zR-Ldy`f!QoIi95jLzC8oe(!zvVuTDvIW5zIOobCN*5ILD9%hT^ zY6lm)+E1IhTez#u&osVy*8HklVA>b7Eha@-w8uQufACPZ?_KPv1{44N`&}>EgtzaX z?*e!H1?KtV=Lc2YWRsGPBRxri;U#p%PoB`JoYd1}{JY@)ebewiFWckNB;P+i%E}*o z@|DSOx^I8-DL$*ZxqPW8k4pEITmG}>Q}^B-y!UDJ1G~s_x(0M^fE<-iyUUv0SguW4vCbe^*3s8#ZSY(`rMPc{uLJYCB95QDyI7DDx1^o ze)-F9%}hu0%U}NTRh{3yeec0%cYb;M*8O`AZa@0$vxjndcbzZ!LF6iOUw?D@r#DG2 z+oq=VmY>W2pW08uLw^6bee(3HFTQ#H>f0}qf7{8QfB4(vCtv^k*_S{2^5?H!Cd*%c z^Zezj<*$GC^^326`uxBA;>(w5^77ReuYU0=`R3~v&tKuKFj$?NFV ze^0ZrG|jOa(<^M5q@E>D>#8MTYGru(hPRni`+YDi`?Fqx&P{TQMZT7x7H-H zn#|g^Aw8QsPG0=^hyR{6`5|dxk~AhEB|J9?w(GPwpugyQ^cO_r)FjRF-9aZt=zH&p zT|Lm6P4Mudo8azQH^Hrkw?BeSfAC<#CeT@bwtP1$ssa<1&;!MN@&qCYl>Nst0<UIiKxys68dl8MkwP#qj z*7vU2TA%2uW1i)ht#@$x$Ej_y$|60Hl`xaaY)h`!)}CSAT0gjEe`~$LUb~}K)C)Q( z5QZGV!z|LH7E^lt&P!G=P-n|`IXS}kFijR+VJ+R?K+)C<8dJs*{^h$1t^UrQYTbUg zu={L~e=fXx&AgGj8>G@*)%0KRYT)4K^@5hf8amP!kSiOnyGAnHy>N8) zlC8-G5Am*Q5r4c^*a7Yzv$NH&tm+bwA0Q?I>l zZLXO;eQ$&BbXS8I@#eO#>ndj-Wu|{rrYtWe+s=HKb?bG_e{AA=n{1%{`-7Q0BB#=A z_8^(aAGzp~o##gDR_&T)Ant9n86NZ|lN`sQ0_LbBVb#&x+G9(zI=_gq`s94KS+`=J zU9%P2Xi+>IPUZ3)`2gKf2+Un*rB1*6niaZt&1}AV8?A~*!zrve59UNv6neSXQk~;I z>(=bTar?`)e`fbjv^HL3Q2TkYpzE+kS(wT$-)#z!zxTSm$Gz6A-G#0A%N2dOzrpel z3y$XXpvmU*tY}Qq){DBV4>-tGRIO<$^Qn2m|8lUiA0NHI8RUD98E-iO{x)vN=bTgh z{txFKXYc^g+HEnGbnpH(lZPAZ!h0^})8rW|6YCZie;H&!ba7&sX0_f!cDQIel43SZ zUU&4uC6jDos%d?&d|OFUnXJC7sq~{oQ_p}zR|o5SDeoy zH}T8ghGjqOP#=r+NA{+nwWRf=8^L9NZ;a;22k+hp2k(M<@GQq^x6{5R9&-PhWzHUK ziifxaiT9EP!Rrr&&BdhX1$SwcGTSz?PI+CmjoDMNMkWgT2J2zL>NafuEZpCjMYv{K ze|C5nb~4@T&cHRxMn2dWzj(0b3`B~-ElOm3V|nCj?f+|**L|=tVjyX}=a}Lwm-)?6+2c&sd2!%&Kor7do5_^} zSw*cZN?KATMFBKi>%X>%TmAq~yJr79f4F8j%!eEIkK`6#naax9#39@}3OI|$q{8S- zCV9F11D6q~CdFz^i&DHKl`R+A8ryu3b*p~OGHDMt#5}~}`Uwg|?BHP0>1j>XZ7U1< z9`{<)MI`6hAAetme&vSOcYv@-6+`!(xJ zXc7a6(aO}O$x#MA0S#o?VonkwZ+5XycN8@r4sy3*_iU55Zhu~{e9)s?C+^Ru8L7yF zCR-d9rU`C@(@si31w?Gpk%PEsGG7XdSiwx!JN7!>pNC@?53_Fdub2P&e`ph*lEh2D zH47f~+RrZ~OP40rkoOL> zhM6zw#=%A+TP2|XaU?YU#Vmo_F`ah!Ol$VSqYL|Ym&=0M#9}0QxL3yuRcE%v#LWsW zP!e-g=RQsH9;m2|CK`_QGmHw zUcQ}qwzMsFG23CE?a(Jb^Zs2YQ?3`w#-mMaSr65$ei6LdsW?cPx38D)v}oTZ-*rV| z8Ei`rPw%Aij__v`rmDhwT1MWGMmTTv!db*f^xRwD#Oo$vhkJP|6TEJpUoYI{qdOZg z6AvBxUbN3mtR-n3e-4ZVx(Sn8v*UrO_NZ69oe489e~=x3VrlMIjbTt(aZv4Kx8K?Q zZtqRU4!8UErg`0-zh3#PM|U>(4i6*lyS_;CDmuddVR9R@{QJ5%;)%DN1xy@RE$^@G zWNY6YOOX3f?{IUUb2iuP;LolRWApuckM5rshI(38dD&SGf9`Y;5Q_p(vfGYPpgml^ zW6I;66ZyyA_5mQCQaMc)WoAjRu(Xe35wd2&iT_7{ zq2ms1bN4;BVL$EnZu-=BlR9}H|EGF-jFv#MLDxT*@0hi^|C)7sGkh|^Q@8xM3p8aI zJnz{bY_%m>f3G3gy<1y;{_{TH3CDB8V#jUB+?!Dm-{gIY_+AzXfW9^_3|Afbooy4^ z6G=&TMC^$B8+1ps$4f mx&!r@%hv*Kzf2GDQ_%85poRco1RGRppfoFz!4a=FdO; z1{km-)1ZWjnRUgYfT_{7QV*CSrywMntsF)CEQeWcf7=8{uQU-?`*8yD=Aup7x_e!N zUX_2`&FL}e!RA?2%wY30$?~_TvhrauIlU?Uos@;?_z&B?HZA|9WYGJh8vWxRC)pA1 zguz-EL4ZwwQkdKT{j&v})+V1PMF|RkeEDw5zuhaUd2?fr($1>tIbHi8LsWv+1Cz=fCAGjV?9u&XD5pQ_6aVDvhR%@TV^P)C zZClIdN&>=#K*M9*HaBg{WdO7Un1%wSh)`|T@YO0kY_#M_i@6NbkA1N>U;YD#^7$-g ze>8K}7M^5~4wg&ko7v3dG{rbY{sOj}*urA%Xm7TA%YPuv>AV-jkWm=OTa?e9Ostdqj^BUU~J5Li_ z@)_MeF9cQ31p1vehyQ;;1%%(!vW>T`{d{;Xd96BcSt>x+e^ z`%SWzXS$*_X#5m|cd#kuI-Rl#jAz8o*iW99{F|vEtGWxjuH(6+r_myW3IlE;f9p!7 zmgSd<@xA45_om25eAmgm@Z(!UaxfCU!)>bv*|_mI`zx*s;SW z$S_v_gw6wsBQR`oiKiW-PWZ8TvWv=xG)cDe?N=8EqP>Gdy?&W+ZCuB{mQ*VC5T6r> zLw9W~QJEDg`DkA+u&puqeu>hAf9_1T$7OA|kT+E^8{R1`t_Qw)nXNcKq-u9cSE#WJ z{=j2X%Hh>*D^tvqk!x>G*3Y~leqOU$@T+KR=;33Ur%EhmRqC94;!Y_!X&ZW%mI-xC zWLI1HBAfa8E z;)Vw%>^1Bqk{+&k42wfHFXnRyg)>JxzML-(Gt!LjZwj1^`)zBhnersE5Q7~7d$<`0 zZ!DBM+biGeH(fb=Wo4U>ez^6$qOg6*7Y zyd&JQ#6Hky!O*0nCuyZ5HfrClz0`5$L%D*egw2eNA> zwKgyv0C`pMWs3!@e=@6;BT=fO-0l=VVH1fQFxzbcI&AMWjByi0R!T$LwcPUUo<#n; zZM~nY{ViR4OLhA;dq^n)0(1d2cKfhThyy5k+i~J0smQ{u<~7L=b{;EngW1=Ez0IB_ z5XIHBG2Z%COL*GApmggKj(>utU()UY^)X?byw&uR{vT{zpQHNIpl{`@;rjK174Td$#w+Hxl z(oGLIR@rEZid7_8p@*0&l2Cb8d5@C|9SoV27>$dng@^^;3I3;idsbLlGLC_W$B-io zQ>o|05jO-lR+0T+G^C1_ynX`?< zZ`2b*VAfb^v6xM`T@tS@!pRasB1Z>dLFX-}&LhUsX&6szN)B`(zDrMA^ZMc|w60)Z zv0sy(#u|Tg+3pZu&K(O)J%sk=O* zvB;_9;BZ#a*3U7jKj6=cP8Vuw&U4{FHo$gv4FcMo+=0vo5+_H+k&oP$VgL9a@#h?n3BS<` z{qdiZ8#ICkH}{jTXhhjz@&&dhP4a{m2U#{OPgkTa;kJDDnihXrWCvBv(PSDER)9vO z@zJdD8ao&}i*8cN#&hYzwcidQwvgS>e`mb^h@SCjnV}QU3*?v)ZOX=t>mY3Qyn;cc ze)YUQL%+!Pxl=UXh|_Q?I4o>@W3`l2ARtvBu?*OAIRpl)fgs6kHb@`~4W?g!D1#&> zUe#)-*(EKU%H%iqAU1G8@`+cmHc_S!v?J`#h0@Pl1)l;zUYe-)V! z*e)WIqWq!+3nP`tl4>dvqecSJLYDtHd7&5XTiPxQF0%mxqSF8*(qI^6;XfwLw)_Xg z$4z`Wx;V|gXvfCn?0&I57pJqxgu<+8Dk%8qoT6aG;_NgW2;ZFik~*SKqr?*l8LkPB zlTkFaaBwQtwzIkze9W{n?5sdee^yFKOrymvUrB!=ZN|xYk0`{y72&SzWu zl{A0;;eYrXhlmUjk{L8+S?$?hVR>-V(Fkfi-%a;hU4<_b3YzCDF(_f3Ck1cg5>a zq{}$x8$V8zZ3~x=lesk;p$Yq>kSg*A9ET&9Hv(dW%?)pPMrkz7xgc5Kk6C0qN7*^f zo@zRr(`DXP*2LWw4A&2N3fK7aq%h!hLHnx@8}JC&YW2LRTqbvY25@R3e0VSQJEh+i zQm%Ale40}nBC7?djzD%Lf3H3FIqg%Om0om%!7kJmVr`vJ@xtcfw%^`EqiSweP`8aUYKUqg8>96CN=E zr=LN`fO(MW0d&3@(rvmBir>B=n;i7E+9amAJl-z$HPr2lrjk~zW~VLqzftxObA~C@ zbZu6Gkdn`NFLxM>e}B#m!+z^2&kgyP(<848#mL4>VW>9_5m1)JL9z9eE*e}L{o97cx5PG6JRfc5K_ zS0mh~g^_rT6+i&DmB^QaDEN^8`>?=h^tyEOjK+V!53+xz-MpfO;lNnam0khcjGZ^! z(ZvPgSU1dHN#XgBNH3sYMt(>S#(9#d23`RHrNuvWg&8qKhi$P~Pg^ybB(xPaa&BI z9?E!Hh@S?8KFGwV4CFLiQ_uh)!$#TdR}BQC5}tR=mBYU1;3On}^*}E=Jki_{_*UR9 z;^Aw6+aNPCewP`i-seoFRvkkpF&TjDfFwpEE;3l;It^}xO zdE87Te>;hU&8U+FT(t0YO%d2Gi|JT0LDd*(%m)8Ki;+buSzoo0$D4(STC(R|#mtd| z*iu|7vwbg&O{cb=PsonYuvL;DSI8RxRNyP=I&i7_N|=hh1vn0zqu z%ps!T9TkmND-(TNi%5lCg ze;aYePN;%ADd*#VF9lVSHa0Hwdd$+ad*ieK-K3}ljK@3CXP{Hf%Lz10D|X_tr!DIU zH(iKH03ESXQmMciSEv$F5q_&U8FR^VN~lyvzI94_q+hX>WWG9Gv2guD@_xUCjT; z1v&%zOdegBtumZaXRr7wa#xEU)sd$mGs1=7Qn&8GAPxeF0Y^pM5tt2kO$ApKe1$MZ>DiiG6$R;7sw>y5yu%o{RBvA9uX_s4QJ;vL^B-zFnkNRn$VIga;^ z+w}A7wXh_tu5Z}a^JUn@vi&9|J#zRwSJ*Pyhb<+%SJE-b`7-G4j-{}SKJqWvr z%u|t1Y@%}2D^L~FUSaqmYeb@Je=OaViT6vxXAOF=7ztftThJr{5|@0=H&YZfgL0Pd za7gJ?kj%Fn`y(f^?E=~xXv+YXbZ`*(F3@E9psvxb%UxTnf#HgBxut8yI1~b$ag_9^ zzDD#BWAYCmZ&!-Ymf~B-V!;vj!qBtp*`Fz3p4_Tj&fwJaHKWs0j@_5{e@LYe&!>`o zJqFn`qdAlB zT@s^-$PAEngdJ$@ja8Lvj>uTTA01T!jG7hm{VG(5~ zIx*{>hg{*Zwl#aiL7$3}f0YC1bRyW2incyB)gF-9N5!(mJx!^ zK#cXX9q5(_swZh4_aja93uu66oUwgOZhD|<&VAPx8x05_Jk=>%f3yW4eYxO2IOzZv zv{55c1t2FWWlfKzW<}+WV*yb3tDsOh<;591#xwh=0mBTlT*-}?MT3!(UD@)d%GBp_ zHx9%p7JxX&j5W)1vV((p!5cHAi&;E(lh^#=z#cU(1owa;;t~PkiH{f;F1Y|=h-+U2^|Hu- z!Lzx5?LMehQSj@2@+F&nB;_+US>4uYoWz=&=D=0xtdF26KxU1uXH>kRawXYZs$TMq zY8l8{?}a+6l3lqz;>)JK`bk_iuu0VOMb~EGM^cpIv}tDJf0&XOk97Mp_6MhA*uA$`5tI&S6|Jh^x=TZy zd9(&xN(PNQyqTeJQoDjDz3d05hb69$88qxLx<+hs#f%Ps z5dgL|%eP#Ze?uRzV#D8TMX8^o`o^mWE;|$EDWT-bvoi0>RFT2TRFo?Jhm`uIivJ=D z6wTV$!=htYl3n;XMz#VpR3^awZpjZVsb_0cIaFW^bPK4}&{A$p z)|)>#5l5jNswcVm!2a!fv=JNH(@3hU*Qjh6MVf4A5^)dF137?msdMp=GSN@?5N$Z4^eD5YMqSwee;GwHtp`*v?g3OSCDT&AYkPz82Q@=L z$MPk5xH38#&enJEteKN6zVN`x4OXgTHcekn9+BZRn^d|zR!xjAIrOvG)F)WRD#Lo) zmTeD5anlEKuh8ANez96cxRTd$uC%M;5Y?gezpEl9j#=8%VBCX{_=)xjvpzbcyKq02 ze~uhKl+Q76F#<Awm#VF}f_+4^|7a8jVNmhl(fJ9js znKoannjO7Ruho6aM@|gFjzf3iFFU%hGR99#BQ&NGU};P4pv$Jd1+07_F2Qcq9cDY9 z{9&Y6rOZB@8G7Of=y}Ok?U{1}e4sYQe+>%p;c6n9<isO?_aq>@MRu65U z2bC)l-5HpS9QP6(#3CFenlxIoFjqgcUv#ntKdwmLfRc6~eLh;zL1S`_cYw24O>+!q zZ&8{;%3u4-oVpGUnSA0{bYq5yK~JjGo$EnCQ0jGts+6p+QqoA56lO)2^h<)g-I}q%zu{V2X{Ye_~whkb@h%L$nOCcNo$hS$iOVyfnZUB!?K#A!3z5 zT}JT}@$^h#!pL{V!{)iIIu63@=?T2CJam;tjgL_I2&YG#$X*djiPR_e`2`-se}asd zBv>5x1m7VL7vhwx!zDgG8!X?c-a*}i6eymh?tw&eWNfj-L-6{1m9fqkfA`f7ed~IC z?ZYUL%d|(?99Q9`KG8OH0THJ70ZosOI)oL|Vw*K&$nCLj%x(ND&~vIE{h}e?gupcyLg$i@?6} zoI%9U5&e9?UsvZv#yEnEV<$G@?H(rwfj(#Y1!k|x9pD0Q#37~6BI)&h3VG#$B^x@#Vsv4ng0rwNFeM;uFYJs+q1n!2T&RhJ5 z4crxMM_IU9OsTqye{)Sy>0}jLguwKX7tXtuf_7emM^610 zTHhu&N&tk9&6~ofMcFhD7##6o$N@WmX^4P+MqBN?`azp@X+yE9o6DDq@~CuQx$QrD zK6UTiQNbR5e^BAGLwXvznzl$H)iQrEwlXU(r(;>+}-Vv0M`A5}ItC-lU7 z@L8|l>8J5^zT^jyt9*L0jeJ|Xi+)A(PX^3e&F&~#^RWb8S12*UK4NNZCmf^0cp>$? z+G^^~yOtuY00>^RjT=e-CPyrjYoD-5iz;PE!ROP%mS_ zIlP0+fmhR&Uq^BRbdBZ+z37-I$cKJh_(Kt2w47xMXTXl}lFr;K7 zI`q_ae^U}f7j_sf`~ko0>BLP1!_diw*_qotH{yH zO|p`~_Eg-N9isQ+2HbeGpLkT~cB{DGL!O+_9w@|84K=ZL!{y|aBxhXrQf7hEEuxYGeBE&w56s2^@u{~v672)306klUx6*p>sG#dFiQAfhu`r;r;fTXa!9@1)P;~^#ESU4t}a&6C!X}WIg=D1pj zlMxQ!N4@~Jm>luAitywG+HyUbk3`CW@IWk~=N|4P-?+)6Il$Ja=R@<;Ud^(&N%Zp zKN(BW5P$Mm94ALZ@TJE%0NWGaZLP0h<7y)ijn%$$ssP%#C=kdC%Q2^^-&N^`x~5bk z42-a!HiD(}RWFEaeJNf_UUmYEe=e$7llcq4ii8cUpuiiG}9qy}~w4gXF}|91-WVzl{gKi>nv4 zg(UOhYxm>eT=*ML&7j0eA3g)qCVV2+Ob$YthGxDoTm2DAv%8`!5u$Pg^)qY}M;#aO zsBb5C{;>*JcJ>PCwg@4ce+qv~`awE0_-dM^U37e}px#q7 zvM?29MPyzak_qB^e|Dc72@bhG!NgjPnX(48D`j|bqS$i1lo+R#aDa=@1fp0Pcg^Am z{-~P8hph8@&pVdm(9KO<1H7>BlBb7R4y-Qp1rz8i>XNMVhSMqXQd;`4DnDGk*xSyDz+ohf3( zTX0Zta7J8XQAW9Xj|Y#5PS1}w?{eP zw6!L+Z_@6l;3G4jp9PQn6im^G^D?Tnx2B8q8^-+&i*8dbR_QquA+szI87`()lu*OH zEjR=7On<_M9*LHIgQcj$4D0ighzf7;5X>sl(Y8P)@bo7P7YyLJ_f z9>f>Jn)JT9eqCu76^8T1FOYK`Yeid`UNGn)G zZgU6ie(aGXV@e$~;@M1hxxHy5Q;&U#5Un>tjtmrI&AMN9Y$h!$jdU`V6cMXS7qZ9S zapYIsf7LUYD6T41qE!;lo=-plX+4!LVqV}EBXu$H#JO_^QARwTyL*=Lp$Q!nV$NOV z=a53Ii&I^FoXXpQKRefu2ib>2MVPN%tSi?vQ|L&PD*{czwHCjRw$$=wCDfLx)F_DI zi%?^WPcO1U{~QsdhtgvHAaiL7mzZ#{Q0=7}f4DW>&jxiQi>y8L4ItF3C>HH8yTie$ z8j&YHKz{}hd?ab+*+|h+hGgk1HY;hXs4)hDOhyWvOkhIu^l94lc-RLS=Df$|>3cnx zai5yURIVyjcnjhLk_N>fL|7q1e{yM8nnc9!J$iRApJ}UO&!gvIPDY50g#sP7s3+*q ze{NSeV^2T*3ah=l0s9+p!DC^6@0^PLeQ*Zs@0}s`ciYF{_P#?9Kht(o4At=n?_@d% zR$WLkpF!Y`Kpg#2pg=UvBh$5~Ve1*H%En6&dlTELOib(o+zh1fATOX z0{*~ju^JN|QUyWKu_H=WYXsGs1#mc>Z4Q}`m%=6F>zvNice(7_z#c%(v>(poah<09 z9U?>yz0!#QV2&{RA6g!#JmVe295*i76VE%cm(7?ovR9UE6$Tw zD^b@hrLp+18z%h#lhKMvA3**-fAjgF=R)zEBTh#j9~@#j5$x#0OOz;ES0D;-ZjK(c z{O)ZqPlM??mU(*jRP*%F8O+nW=Q2;-It+Hfi}PUVPrBg6`q`cPp-%?CL^+VOR{t&G0yLbG zX3v_fy-@P(SSS=c?!tL)yGYJ&P*4#O+2K*5T83U-#(wf@V=-7%DUs!{L^+*HR;o}$ zN62<%#7z^|se-(C1`jhume7$3^k-{(q`VQFVmI)w~ofHvgskfoot{uh?=t2*}#{U z*N1{c&`*_-e$X2!ZnD=ez40JKcN30@8LlN(ynPxso`DxAB=5rS)&g=0?V=PMe0-Vn z;F2?~F!bt_a=VXi`)r66@Q%PaL$*sg7YUP|kmaV~?Ul|%p0q#uf4q_GKEolS9p!Zo zlQbw>bgfnisWVnJcruPY^*AVSi2x~BR|O!@0SNZ{BS>W47Xge$b$|smZ+oG)vzcMM1X|tf!4l7Xa<-u z?&4OlWhqn!0&PZ#r<}s9Xgyr#3e1A5V*T7Do4m+i;D$0-e=%k66&iKaiAaoV(1mc` zPA7r`LOda))eG*!b#+EhBL@u?cOs#U%>t3l%+Ebuhq(o%ze(sa5_85~sqHWoS}HD# zmQEFjRI`@QOl!ePK|vn-i9*o5NQ^P#^G>#vQdXhW5%}2llV4P7F+>2hc@3KtngwP- z!P$B-B(98{e`VcDPBxRkadSnrcxXEvaf2S|Y7pLyYE&YIlBp2FF$sCuxo(UK*{Gxw zUfg1OfXmrE1>)8<^7;vVuBl7TD`c}-fx2B#*g1=E1MqqK?(j#;y|Lwip5#R6=6s!T zo_Cm!*4*>49SaWXdSW?>2wx0LhAh|82_d<5F_xlpe?5~iK`@677*4{71BIBlc5+&Q zEpI5dt-Rp2kFkS64+6zHV{nPU-9JRoCO;&fW}I4>bo6-C@?AEcbVD@A6&arRq&Bc_ zT+LAyt*3`R66EkWsQR%7YNeZ-^|Uv$E4iM`E7Wh0B`EcgMoSW2JD`j^Zr>EP&H<>& zwl0*oe+bT--PUz)#0nq4{91x>)oQ8|zU+Td~?5iALqxNmi}&?cy@Z{1Tam zPmQ(;)2vcV;NHW(^(iD>)0V6?+FMbWp}5bcGdXon*=+Q({N+E5b8yDANosBde&xm` zyk*6e8yCmYnd2&&^d|I6*ExGJsvzvRAG1KWw*5s(Kefw-+aK$h6FOVhe|!Ypk)2KW>MDj38%XJ>?hoAm7|s1c|qcr z%;)3Uz9t7{J(2g6f>AjuyAl=xCRr@3DY*6L_0&}^#SzXps3|5@UaPg>o5H)oX5TeC zZXDY-XiXOg1KjuG==0^VxSolSOxKA=e`cFTETswEc}Ls75haLEagDZ_L%CEM^}PuB zV=(>|z6veXWJ7q}Yx-lgTuJ!K5jZY@w9W(*;wrX6q0F4yK!kuhqFS;bQaRa+w=1la zxd5@HzsX?y8sMztoIH)iRm{j2sy}=NK5)`L4wQU8x2^?)4agM&G3z0tE^atKm17Ss3g}&^;mwhY?qFgqg3=gc`Ic%FcVn@1ZIRxWg+dm>5Ir ztu?BM*G+aHD4ff4fWK7Eyf6#BE*a8US4mAy#2=m~?0(UM-Ct7a*ri-)4n(*RYXs+r zt|R86=V2STv%3-lUx2ztpo)bff8%NOpBc21%-$Hw8*EUg= z2J9``+^|z`DqlaQmy-wxx2u4>bd^tozNQ0K5$Tg07rcsR0}}vU8%Nu8poXdHIsT_-Y@F?-2t?*KUjFvx zIpR-jZ#P*Si5DFR%n>W#G~(x<%3VP2TGCwTvTfu&)i* zejkx~SS+|Ls&?yBx{&1d{ykwg(uOih%*a#=A4r+n^G2kSIv)clquH92xLXx~k(n8!5vypP%V5gB$PX!tcKPslcx( zq8CitFKfx^6m?3KMo@s&xyg$${eqP?Q}T#v#%b$7^%_3crc~h_CjWCB6CmBE@0eD< zCO#{>&`MpzmOKl7f41g%HP9PtD@6`tDY!M*vY2(x7mmyesjp(reP=vJ?>kOXp^@Zw z2mEWoY|(SvNQJaaxDS3*?p7xtwO$t)XYjW^hU9tO<3N5y^!4Io`V3PEEm&8@R3cJI z8{y@;H@vVFm)R)BJ)79NBq7MXEZIeIp2&E*k2`6yY;{#nf2p*MLw{0PliHVymjjgwZl55Gp?Omt+O1l7w=0W72V|I!ql^McG-GGv1225omAR1 zYNFzZ-Y$1h@%yai#S4vh)~V-&6=e&4(5UFN8e{l>qVq%&V?%hrr7JZqP{A}UGVR)} z@JoB)dwTbl8QI#M)Thi5H&V_#j2)tuD@GQ_{KH^geSN0PnTiWRojtt!& zo7+{A=%b8n*!Yb-kn|K{z6&ql`iF^oF^n6X{iDB~LX@_EQ=M9-ss`YJe5^z=WHZf16o#@>~u7x!Q(}A$kj6`it*s z2`sZyp`C*N_mz0X<_);>T)r_mBHiQYpaW&q z33c*=${MG|4CpqpTr47fKuHv)&N%|wxv|W{Vj4-Yfyt6Q4dyN2lp;OtrSd63)@QWD zA(oo1f9+*wwQD3ik|O|hlYrs(t**H=KMweB0c zaqU|fx4-Ne!f_vf$E)2iS@4h{Ud5=KP~qu_f1A->vhc6aK{D0m@N0Wn($s5%$xLIA z08Bu$zqa3d(Z!1X&tHChC5K1;8?wSti+}7HJjtTuSS20bD>>>pTlDX&Xyn{7 zRtN~(@#;259K`SN#)IAb6hI|{KG*HF`vQdV=gSf#QF}k2$WSsB)*{1gI4u;NY-)t(s z?0+0l=pa9EY21s|nzk!u*+z{FG}TmB%fIhT)XIQ~V3VfqkVsOqlw``0{)jN&)4BuWx`TR;T39(I zy~LPR6eBVjpzL~!q_7{uer1F>m{mqq?&IymKJSEb&BM5rqPAmG*{E(p{S4T!G1TyJ zFJ8z^O-y4Y56bKn&_^9ND$Wa~1{i-A)aM;mL8L{0eXYh7Z97GOcM=PGr-8vf-vVU`a(Mj<0vjh zj?R&GRQK_Gz7tqQe7E%(Sq7fcBec%rDxy&L%0H|R;9p6v;k+!4e8?hda@;3Y!1dUf z;wIy~)Ut7AVy+AtVrTXkQ~(SKNb06C|=EQ;glT(q+_V!*IITuXJt0J9ojb zzMiC2mlNq?@XK;olRgIo0zDqA{8|Pkd8jNuH0=9w_z+1^zJgolkAKmgTYo5iCV+{( zsVR9Vni}`U!j&|ZJcDlBM>a6)jAli6EC&~*$FTKSI*(%$yJ{-vBkp9P#f>Ns(wceh zF2XVoAj3@2humgFI(>KC`isN^GST>5M}igdt`R9~>F}`72-ua?sQzfPKXT=7kXk)# zs4&x5X|W84%QSi6KYyS}9Td@_+vIsK>^cE#_7b_exm6 zJ()_Hcv59f<}j5~j~LNPor9?2n*;WJZf7194>K{A$^LQAPfET0~0!Kb%Fko|=}~29$WZ6u)ppw_kwWOo}_!bc{GUwOk-+uiV%I z#OcZnO$p(mz<@PP~xKH zjz4X|g_!O`gfvU@M#zI*Se!`(T{~6blR0vTn85jRX@9J=7Xdv&+O(RY<;H6x^#E1f zHZgS#2YpfKb)LGu3z|RcpPGzeTJ5|kn$v2OF8(k(K)Ri7?COGxw($n3qYrK*S{>Zr%u^ETK|Aw-7g|y5tt{10Y zDg(O8n}6xp^O9#xTa#Q^92R5EOGKlKjEq8GtQ4$UAqE|J7UrgH8N-{XVGuf#e;~@wZ$-4JWS-=mvP-lTJkF{1vvoMC8ts6G2#yQs{-?QclrUE-n zVhJxHtk%pKgNI#FB7n!leI_{|Gl~QoV|klG^nW9tn_P0FuEBs~Xl6nYPj;*o^dYDn zMHRuJ>}t~4d{y9}WWODDT`yr!rII_7mU#*sw{j!hVLnFN^~uk{(gA{3nEJKnhK%)- zfaRIe{v^Uz3zFB?vzJ<>jP^}A-~;V+gO0vG2NdZ_cCJcQUq!ikN4ibZTI2zZDg{}p z^?zJ18fMV8LeXZ`Ib)txp2_9A*JSlE-|8t*;1OisDh;c!J#ijn=aj#f!GUn(v)6ti zVs74$OO1GU!<$m?rXD|wSkC#(3U+8NE=A8jtR2S+p7t?epnEY56VO-6JvCF?f-YQ4 zMaj4c^7`j;S^!U6|EvLbjce~x0w#$!NPkNQ_8+Iz&1J6k<3X9VC0UoX_77!#FNM09 zd!!@LEvAE34QVmwJfkP5Ov9jeN1hfDj_RgpkIA;Hq~@<~U2h`kdF4vD#9-+uR#=8D zmzt$qWGHbwkBp ze3{!%hKd#NJ!6}r6fU&d@)fY&tl%N|x2u2oO*i#nL`@%ptsR`nm@KH`D?$ByAHUv6 z{e0&P)X(?zzGu^XZo3aQ_>1@Ud7}&N(yv|r+^6w8!vX5r&^im}#jsE1WDO&58L$#jqOg}7csg+3=Mkkn z*27h%LQY_10$Jt?O|GdD&;E9V)F?~3LB=F`;R;cEl>FkM(h_TpYApF2WotQ{mLjf= z4I86onm6Vs)Lq0}nclw%K@oKlgguTKAT(ahUW2lT$$$o>dt5LTm__MPwSO3#E&z}a z@<~VLjP=?tR{D=}AXpLqwDq}K5yL3!T;EL&>qenTq;QZ3;C8sIX8HxqMI{`4RVxvQ z91|ll48n4)qTFEKdSWK)kFirs9(OuGcYYNh; zagVR_wJN&!*#Gta{ONE0^?(2Azy9n0`qQt+8NC=vT<@V#I9QR(-y?m)eF#@5Gy8O^ zD~(6vQwgq2pY9%U8a?d+cj%cTt2a{XMh}0Krm8B~X|5h?3s&?|&VQxvsx)EMj;>X!4OhXFVB)%r zikq~PH7{N)9kV<;0Q$Q-`6NOj$v#E`UM0RNB_(A18va$^j_BiF;oO{?x zCwnc%p?%$Cd#J~8b&yZpvW(0&%Ocx4(+u9^ID(LSUC>DVc75^?$5*1L^j8!W4T)jlW_jm=p(| zoLero?OinHx0@AZ+n8{-1!y1i%04uOV@ekn-5tw^aM>)GklcBDWCA24h9sBDR0q@~ zRv{N+Iyjl8a--x3{Af0%l9(!LzH))X*ti>IUp$VKIxQ_tN4B7~8+PZZq?HaM0gyA1 zX%ortQGaUYRhrck>$5a>BS{<6jKaY+u5Lz`*Nn67qXt7lbk{}SAq=)V;wKz%uJ|58 zipl9nAx8!mF{yk0z;}b)_0o>X?$lmhpx~4A3LZ4eU9c8qjZWpB7H%}9GUT5dQ-gd6 zUXd}G#(*vGS)6|C*;^{y1qliNLUM(g0(a4W_DMS#jn3o%D_c7Jk6lvkaB*A zu1Ui=U}Pd<#7>W$?8d4~8MBe`Rm`4pccB4S%iMEtRl#MNCSU*jr>PIZyY=!{xCy6J z(SM@zdMff(jqbeZ@&aGtNPfKUq9Z5Xca(jo5=TxZxSP6l>`OCdTgNwa)3A@F?F z?FZ6Er9i4#D9Fg+N!;5}`Wy?J&6VbVlEA9f6uM+VNTreTgYd5k4Oc@$u${x% zWoQfRm(f|moOBpxZep5Ir6qMCv$PknN+$vi zaL@=RaxBk<7L(!9pg;U59hxhMTR;>oDUnY!3|`&wxxzF3CW9Z7rO;zZW#MLaL%&_?E4sMOZC+{d_yXtj?aXa8zJbzst>Ya5l zQ~oN{d&Ief6-ye|o$-+zXK1wf4`%F z&uKL2TzZ~(9FPSJv0{NkVuYFLlI8?XEV(U*lW};wFb&#=9~L|zIyizd-TQ>YGNtC)nL3s$mU-P8x*f66?IGV*b@-G37e<68tXW)6f* z(&of?YnclJgQbgCp$zHA$(Qa@C|dOeX($Bl#3pBsK$eM}vDO6ZXF7l%bB+VP zuVzt@-2frWzx+lzww(yk5RGabD+%-azti^CuKcdTdLDYO!dKB@lu($lTNL#3I!*0wTYWo;kAfdMHPC;!mt@tU_fw5@s$5 zJ}bL7iErKz*Ez;K2)>vx0oeo0(}2R$`o_kD3P-Jf-BAwY$$y}2v0&nR=yy61hq$o< z;4qYcc1K8}2sY)qYZX&K>1Pg6?AA5ml~#>6qG zX35+pp?`uDve6Rjg|BcD#`dP3038Td3AWLmD}RbKXIDkqR%%Mx+BctMKT&uJr?2Zm ze_`TE`e?#aS1F#u`eeh1l5)KBy1lDho{ei8mxlZN)66rGGSil?qemS~GM>!I&!;A2+sr>|X8`^HLb3L?c^ho)xOH1jl_ zT#KNYuh6GZIrsg@d4(KNmh*ba?|-u>3tCnUIl3h}Uho)GEyl(9Bb)sVgFfWVa2Nyj zM1P)jP(2kA{JrJQC1>lobb|NNxBnm{cItkg!8S=_Vw^O&I6c$W^dq-;j9X?-*A=j_ z=RoWFF*@fbks@h(b#zjl4Vi(+Q@0f>22%kcs?EwaT-&^ z#&=I+&y3sVm{6Uko||>WT0r%Z+^SqfCVzLlmU?7Q$jMcQBqFWyLV0GoQNv?O!zZXJ z5}kI$&~xW9HiJy1%!=Q1!7lLvd>T8cZ6Bv6X@3vX zPg<+0t3Ce`WN5u?sTd7f0Kp_dGlZ`3hUC80y|@xQiw{rrAs(E;hj=*jA>!#*tN#?J z*89f{PCw4hs|c}D%Y7#ELgb69O812~D&rN^TCa({U%J51ORhFU!egA!!I+s_%Z$>m zSqf?ix+po{^>gY?jI?Kx2hk*dBY$u8M*5=IC8G}3nXY72WWuy9A%4OUXf^QIWR9A7k@@Y0Jm6D z`fX2s;aFu7iAh;BBs8+v+>I$TwT(=Is5#SU8rOIA@jCZoYn6CmgS*off|2iewTAfr z0RRC1|LlFsk{rjC<*%gm3NVYp2o%*#g4Up+NvfM>pu{G{F`H#%WMq{?krBywlu%m9 zX4mWf0oiN>w9K^9PCJ&(kAKXUjGuGwb@zyRpdeIvp$ferQTYxJf857;JQc)z)P2d5 zP`r(R>rBnfB*9fnmH>^49&tgJBYBC{S7JJm^cQD6 zMJvCd=6+`i2+y;kHo6GK1URDN;>~jNgGRNUQuWK4IGU>T(?ZpxHGk2HkuJYwk|IOZO z-gvn>LfRqnfPSXcojzk8j&?l!q{1D_L@PJc537?>!02FEAl2`RLI znm~=55gY1fR;7a;8D`I}+lWp=)Rm z9FpentDpW>@PAD%9{bW(n|kFxinOXfjE{V}`g=X9XUVHdn7DT0BM+XTCNXBUM*kwk z#<5_*$W&KNo>cDfr@#2bFWl$gYUjQB=Sq!lWdzb==i2Msk3aq7@x!|mxBH14yV#tu z!)UzE<5~o5GTy6oQx2J0Oj{TrqZ~I8*MQAv>ng=jWPiM5z-os)TtZ1iqN(WK`Sd^x z2XbDpA9$ZWWVvD=s13l-n5TS_@npZz`=c%zyjt#*iQm6(%Bt))vvRzY+J&n zgS2#k>vD#OP@s|tucrW~w1oq?vZy<-uX~{Jtf}K#o?#%Ii=y=x=R~$Xz`N1>IUrJM zl5|2VD$9NO>2DU`iePx}40v*93kOdn_*N?esegJC3$r<5ZWwand~E#_6_F3b9v^J0M2pHQKVnz){Gk` z$UsDRyKblbNPid(EPiPW2UUp?rS&hT{-rEfFJ8!ee8p$%I zKPFxwsJ2TOR;!7sVDsc&gA$>%)XO}xuYbLa6GOz)*GdGHkW!R_j-7ayANn}_y7OsP zb{>E9@X_i^E&1I$4A+7o3-cL&-+k!rmq04pl($w;om6=;%($lncQr?~FU6gkTa%~~klii}3gY%a|0*kGt`Cn^KY!$1 zmZz@{8#911u1mJr3=6b%1Kg<~STpan9aYA02mDRT=ug3xSx`U_q)6s!q{jZa%aLNG zIGXr|VPf+4Ad*ftiH+iAk!=jD_L_Uj`&fVMs*Z(dB2MZS;)tmXaGo)+{)7~nZ>a~x z#9X9XT_z`xGxd0XVxSPf`_Ys%=6}dM7Jy!%!EH19<^S^8 zzvpgF=>@afqAEE&0Q2t$Q7_&{W&OyAB~PJq7|Y$BxIZ<16nKe%QNFO#NkLCipjx%l z4iSoaLV_MQ8mK3-WJ3F8P9jxt8jS~;M+<_RU5j=UjZCo-4Xky>MX;jTrGF1RQRGbJ zgm|f1oddpWAcQ77FOFMu`{QfK#Q}#QC=gU)}#rB3wFt%AGHShkz8-^}gUXjpEM`#_<2 zl^PYUXwb0Wm-<%-s!Vn*5h+!x^PO-cvO+eD;4`eg{qmQ2cFxRK*ni4B|N8r1-^}z+|3ryoK@N#b*BY!Rl_~*iK(~-b za8>tNBz2j6EUhl+^|U{N>5!^6!K6Ha>!=W8Lci*3>R3jzZ3=I$hpu1G5Os1W4^eM* zn7111)p!0RZ~YY`et*r46?Pu4QJ88fM(1RSuJxoHQ|wYtbul zDZ#(nwNAwtl-OdTKJQ~}d;ZmZYc>w&#^{A0zL;%`0uiJ!RDXZYZ!KRMc%*zQM#Vcr z6KbG|A>%8eaxvSu(Vy^c6EcT995?i#jPBm%-}^sunkzrK+3gYAQYEZ*;YcC;K7cR@Ay~CU>9^3N<5e?F%hZVXk-mXcFjC8!~`IdT#Z3mT~+t2s3A1 zU+|e)ccxvLT7Sc(wSoIEmtw5~vkFGwV)LxtRz5;7Yy~29_pdHvnjTYYD!;4a5+-0UdpBo*e07@MX$Q=-67Vv&r7uB_@sJ{l&K@Ev#nsQ} zcrO!#rO5Xu4F-q@3*O}-e*v?v67hQx{}T0SCz#(voNJ(Q0B()xsMwM-s%>P7JX-w< z&4Qk>;(vx61r~oApG>SCMAw;*A8NCy4mRe*JB%e;FK^V>yvB*0r)Ho5$RGxu^6w(5 z&=8G7BX9q&n6<)UJTc~l+Vyc=k@h@4kfc)UL(%W*v2Ho+7SW2iCpMhQU4D*a2+c&5 zKDA8=F0ZDKQa4QodDV+2##JTRas;v_H;77dF0uqcW~JL7w5W+N9H zz<(y@-F)aqbIwBYF0_E3{>$K5%@8*TT5=6dSazNeTjspszQT~UnsFiqVH51%Cc7=&n*Ay2<)w?p#ecwq09A z{zp(qkRG2|(iN%y6C5?r^%%6*=N2|th#k_B`9`CTmyq7-L#tgoI#Q z(uvgE30cm2fMUx0VZ4lx9KN2JNAJi2>+3rtY5N0I0>zbK4OAV_ynh*+_uR2o-~ICI zFSFcpRqas}DC3N(@@vla@85SV`sD-J)of6i^Dgc_?r*UY`KhWYeHy5bXpN2juuLt3 z0~Qt>voSwo@?~2*KC%obO_@c%+ec@9HK_Su99kM^u>U8FZMC-G!rBT5&YuCn%9pgt zD=6n&QwP~fEZKIP`hO*BAJF7{vKm~&s|Q5NwcEZth!_pa;wLu@r8EpQ)ZM1CN^e8> zeb;$q=e1y|H}o!n4s?}i`~v5FYR&3|!uJaYPo9l6(a9hHH6h=5G)yPhc|>u+3LH0 zOWE@2Ya-}8;XAIr``2&3OkVWt+pl$4U=QO1y`Yyf`+vq&Rbo8|HTS6O53S_0-`C=` z&~3MUYV3R)y}M0pQ&MvfcAS||+1QCqq`=>?v4jK`gFbE94i)SWi|`2UT0Qm211f54 zjK|eiBe7W{1$#^*9{dGj*W62MGWZ#S8kGX<{e^GQl^E>l0dor}?#_q(;XR2){d+01 zdHyh4Ykv)rLYhcjKucJ?==^_(ScBZL6jK09P)pDImThDWS55AdPNJfulc$t}te8lD z)|AJ%gBPOeKSP?*XUshX3xq)vJ0|$1k!>Gb zzpG$YPnTKj$4AT}xwH7o6y!wQ|Kynsnv-rl1;be>cbyLq`KH{|O%2xmv)}eU{J8)q zQj%U`JR4RglDp7E$*u^b$Tukv#HeFLoBq!Qqhcuk=h=9M7=))gbN9JY-YVd<@RMeOBbAe&@BgTw;K@<8(UH` zevm@QjEYzQW-uV3M4%a4=BRO^ks=b@1Ai*S_;%Pc8#emNU-9M>2?STw~to$ ztum|eQ84urU1M3NDka0!iV?*T!_W@p+{VV623vs040ew~S2dOF?j0>PAJ{|&?0uK&F87R`bv9=b2iF)6@!y?NH)0l*1o<}&in^7!pq%{d&0D~V z1XF^n)U_@rl_lrZ&ZxF^EJoei3xD2~J_W2y;SH#SJSAr!I5(~ut?YLMUA`GMvm6a; zS#H7;f?d!*tbV9?W)z3b#YM$Cl8VI_s7h<85iv_svSJ~*pC&Cu#IcFe<4~(t@sR_( z4rM%f%DNK#vP8&z!(hk6%83zmhpl>S4#~$10@|5+(^vbUr3t}A4S*0)X@4Z)kITN3 zLOi2YEpszz{lEV?9ruZI@C^FBl9s}_s$Bcy%Aaj>&Dv6c8ge|dOp7{Gf||Xhqc3IM z48eQPxSum(=QY;??#_XC&w}VeBju{wG1wKTV9azyv=Gs+X>;ZbW!3%5^8LF$lYhJ%+&E=w31Fx7$pa-crI9UC+;yLZsmRezY|<-_U_xQr z9XnLEpU|B}v%9rFw2;cJ4&i{>iKbOUX=KgBtsFlq?XyYRK&uLkQV0x|hmx)POw6CC zEE0!qD%Fiwa)<~?t4MzXGRy{jVkIlAB9KPws5O00dsol%E#S!@?0+=SNkhsmJT6^m z6Jur1oJDky1nx(`o}gO*@WWpnAjBiN9%3gVro&kk)S%fXJ%^?CKpC6YAM7dhRl9X> z>#%lRnsygS-DXOp!}OJtlqiqmzFeuPZ4CjDk}{Fnzw^P@JKfiFwVHkwo{L&dKi5kL zZ@9vYxZYdzObbFTr+>WY83oWr+1#JA`Lp+#g8bD>U(@fAr+-x0Pd9?c_Kw<{cjyNF zrY}$bRNmJ85ivB8U8R0vA9Y$HAV`X$pDUA4UMmIB59dDpI`!+xbe|}4OHV9Qxb=J4 z=W60rO%mbAQ|*LK05fqD?&Jym!Q7wUBygte%SfsnaT!(R#(x|iv5fpGlao0q$;(7~ zFExfQ0A8U`6AsXpw(O^`j_Xj~nBhPO!Z9nJjBUORK|vACqy0A(>=PT2Tv>@voqe8t z-}>g(xR^Japy)fwQD%PzV>z*Lpm1#25};Z(U9V6qe1wFMQhvCUg2V=sb=Vd}rki#u zm=!9{tYaY;vVV5*!KNVA+6!`m_q|JmDzU34YfFO*-*!GluaXUDSH7sHUX>Jx$Fm(% z4KX8?<2V%If&gCNabJ0AUjqybOmUw-xm_j@9dXWTj-zswqZ|8h@#q4$#QU?EhQj12 z*`uh+e(VnWa)0DZ_#!Hd@6l5W&Z#!Cd@9?1p|C9no`0i{Qqa&yk?OX^WfJI>D|w!8A?udq4o5OcEkxC?t9s;l&Vq+mH5I)T2ZdBK^FsK~y@N1-TYMDNax<_92R| zC`?f&uMQ+MkpuJD{{nJXIU~zMke%UAL@6I#>9@S?zn5y#pW@w@sYyTn*%j2JKh^I& z^X1IT^nZN0{P@4L|5f#uH=VDN3kbJkSgF7rR(P>A_EIGQA1zQ!cMkyhaMld=-Ou~C zpK;d~89e>o-8bcEYDDvv-M?VIetG&Dg@hu@O?&fFyVj-`@{3DbU+;WT=YO+yQEm~@ zhP-I9^XUeV{Fm|@0rOBlNEL@*qSq$cri_0TWPhFQMDGCK$TRb@T~qxMg{OOVQGM-0 zh|T@GD&^N?T#6z%JPNvhoQ10 zLJP9fEJvedkt*Cm$5ycQI@f4XQL^@#XM&Fs+e*iv4Gzl0ArJob&+sW zlz$5MV}$sN|I|F5uUU^|k*>&?#HAc(1GAY6aGvcY=haFMV%<9l0Ww`>#$!CK`A#vX z%2%jj=}4@!X1v>^P^}@)`F3Q=d{POzjlHbr6In6I>UTvQSx9x|;SxU4n(!-`N~LXt$!;$N_}hkCgZu)X+kmU)o^fJ_v;c;kib&vi|+ccm)S{K<$VgDFhzybf<>rwbJ<&U9*k`U8LQ%H3Ja!a> zx27B}fZrSKgp;9{%Tpn0Rd0~JonPCRNv+POTy;MZIE`>^YRsV+gw0K_mA|M_&CuIb zZeNQ0J6_Q=CQ#w`rBZa^^*8&$`hP;Hot(e_;Xl5xyAzA?+HVZ#(&XeBtGlzoeGxl^ zEiH+qHO4-#Az9cdAxl}>!zdz*Y0reQc{QrQ2l_=7>em?Hd`Br{W=a)+xT&VVMd4Rf z_PlJ;eS1OtWRCH#yrRt?M9J`0=VBq(F-9ADYlY=QV;}0QX)VIOZU}yUWPAVbH zh1cw|ZYP1#efqlXT0zyI1wn87>z{vj2xJmDhZ&1f5+@~L(yDS}cT%?*g*u4w^s54) zRIy62SB9>p41q|JiyrsoGk^A)as>5#$XiLG1hv4CO}-(*l_Qv}=i(hja}O_y<|uR;I|eCDA|2B~>C#lfgx1 zmThX&_YxFsbvhElb})Y!Es?8r){9gOgpFSBJLI)RN;)?fT0Vz}q)?M(%%YZksqvZa ztdB0f+VofZ{Tor1X@8w^rdqKksoH7DzGAr*bV;H9VLGSt_|Akc-$e9bP|Lab*}*y< zh;hM6Bp2}*&e0N!RLj%%ey)pbd#E|WT7z;ZEijG+Q7hl&IkUc^jmK*1w*?Sk47xm^ zCZBCs%zb7aB8x3_w(J$*VJrcfT$_~&L%CBVqZRnvx+uL+;D0Y#(A7bdW8{N8tkFnj z(@P~xR8N!TA6OAnKQ7-yoSVzsUQ!^Yi27@8slq=oJ)N4e>TiJzO_dypz|&aU|MR1d zS4Xwj1ED@5M$yV$;k_CF1mQ0IV(Q(7({piWcm5pqb8QGSI*HSwfl#)2hp?lsV-qot zy^|P!!NrJckAKUNC%M1$v{10=n$y=9Pc#O$K2ya&o8*4kt9$y3lEX$RBj7^xZ+1$w zVUc+y10`2d0WHz2zvgNaC1(yxe2nrvlZI#80yYg&>hNcYiC`1l;XU z{|jaRJLH@63_3hTwh-`Ewq)i?*(NYE60uO2nikpET7QLop%*VQk9p$WG9%~p*ikaj zEcx#MpU*hCKQ3<~TFhoXIfe?3* zYYD9q{eSVOk$^Dg{5i1^o%}T3x9kq6n6}$F$RFwi^he_hhJHicbnUIF0!hJKmh3RC zNdb4c)@?44pO5v|eCQ%SDxvv#DCvDpd`r`~L;3SVxgED5MKWU-%KhNh%jlZ3s830JH* zj+h(A2Xn{1ZKk|i<*cO#Bj%M~S_kR?Ly8f3IPD~;P&crGqi9!RKDYjgN6~Ol-Gb!) ze}6DH?z%Kb#=wC=zg#VLtAtbzB>u^dWHyf3Ne|?vv zxx`ZL=8H(TQ$r%DgXSs{nh-VZ?=CEJnBG*WG#P8)*^-?l&fL&2*fL7k>xN#Zg2=Os zm>A*^FDXb7MN-enGJdZ1s9&>S=GO(bw|`;k#W7QQcc}gg(n0*8u+>qpi(-R=_6qpn z!veH|F9sztZG8RoH_$f*V3%5P98OEkJouF5!7hagxT^fIW)-&QMpV?6nXkB6McQS~ zRz&4Qtqg_eX@BGo`5Q5^Py;!s+QWIdv2j)UV z;F9*MYlGuELjDI|p1$6~=5Z1?IDaaJ`cF8Ab@l85lGVdP?#i*CRtLL}Vs&fSHD!Xq z@NmI$3%p@@3B6%kz_a$3?f5z3ERf+2g}1HOfnioC7%^`=(>$7#m;eId=BPJYi0A z4m>{LjTft~szUyh@M=dI){DJMBb;O0qM?Wn4LXX2I)9graexo|ZrT&) zUeQe>4t{#4l%mm^u^f_H-j*PW(Fg{fsay?ol%Megmi02hF+M`FYrEZ})vxTQ`9vAz zxE^2PDpyc=kL+NP$i-_~K&bm*qa;Zus(a}#$+n+@`O5YRK}vetFN0#FZ@xPT8f0T_ z{ZbCKg7Fe29v<<3zkjGFe-BJGX)ew%`n1?bQxW~WB=^fHSk8-j88Zc2c{$F(oVsJ& zBktdIC1G}+H1N1HajX#%NY&b()MyUL z!KKm>c5K(wUow95h|rF1I--&f9v<|^N@Ix1>hv!>@o#Qj9e9b)*9N}< z9AUw2K(&|pn(-5Wcs4Wx8g72@B$9GvFe9BkA(~;L9Xfj=GMw(rhW!TppgUVr3dX98 zqrjX!?G=$PY|TmDWC63O;YAP5S@50C4cT8^X->v+<$Zhjr+&;&F4lH z|I_DlYAh9;E(j(OH8D9=XW9R|A5m|APjC1z`&!zO?dfam_2LqYc%>z{)Ua->{X)Ej zO@GM;d*{<;WVGdaAk{_^(~!v*mb;6{n1XUbA!d(ialbmV{YA#J|7l=7hTZ7KCFbVE zyuD(B6@OVw=w7D%2z)>OmHDE1)`+D_*;6(m+XZh3xZ7^~+}A8}nE9@A?xURTG9{+W z6c(kfL(s|Ix;BIs=L7UvXY9sAZ4&K%btX0r|{)qjjeR3yE+HT6gRoYBOz&Sl%gDcaN$ z8_$k^e+YE2U7zHfIy%{RKDmB1)B@}wxHyb{@XwYKc3_T0dCByg!#OCuqTud`hO28? zV+B?x2+kl3_d|2wwDg;=7$ml8{--s}u#UP=BmZ$yJYQOYNc7voy&ZtKmV)*z2fDYa zu79>JH-`!=svy!sWuU0aI#XGl+tsiAfUe5s5IyswT{Nn%j$psGfIevb*Q91mpeuqL ziZhJrg}SVN8k?@4cnu{&)h=wco;HX6d-!7s>x|m2DXxMEsJ0;T%~K=IXpwJExrRzb zn)0a~ad&0rJ+QDg7&mlecNtV$iG62*O;;?A4c;JP~{-ildXE}bE&csBdVdEROVLBihp$@ zn_oBr^Wu@t|It`{Y`X{~0R5TDX=|yyame4hI@V0_P+-_ZUL3;gBGM5`04~4SzYw1urQh#VEW@hwQ0weNl%E**@PPCseP!ln|S|RICUmZ4? zpwL!%c+(`!wZUKCm38}4oAPbiSnk@0JWz;GQzz0aggivhr5mcg);hl>J6Vkaq(Ck3 zwj1%_d;)>0)ni`6lxb2Rb}xV;FsVy>~n_J0g;S2+!L z3G3jZw87aPjkI|Tyv81ClhsinDZgPV^3I6KfKBF1k;54HlYZOEclqUtj_|C?2=+IO zhYf`3hIEtviTcNNXKbrq_l1`F;XjbDf&yb&FAQ@31+02Dy%z<&- zalPg;O6Ck2cHzZQ^Pfr`k!E8eRqA%F!>zow%myv$+}sNfYwL_8lj_&zS!q8`WxL^| zGY%{u3wu9S#D>SkCn=UC5j{CNr>}LGDfM8ks*|<+9u}tjkZo{{`^MbF-(rFh{YB*- z%tYe{DMaXn3rDV*+&XZXM!N2E;xJnNdQ8 z87iCB6p7$q&k83d59xpBARinxr+IgJp;IeG(SVn0&WFee-{0@xKHO@INuGE$qk1sv zS$9L$z<)29LJ1SUt?T`-e3)U+`cPKC_jhj7{q75#$6a%A*89;pS??L%1uXTT9tK&J ze>>S90bX+E`_^vb7P<7B`5G@OdkY`GH1|7~#PRrzB#w`-LgIgTtlxaCGxB#&xR==D zP%5#T*0+lr(D*?LAJ8BC@;h8tT@K^3!Il5~55GS;_~KW12&4SZ|8V3EzW&v6B0YZe z_|ea~r94Y_=*@{Ao{&pkcwoJ4M2ofV_?y?*@%;FI^f7O6x%DxQAJUIfO3r&1`hM>& zLy9M$+$t0YaPEI`L~*=9ziFgwI|Q3WKm)b;Rtq&gJlvMn*id10HuM?hiDu<^qE$7Y zbsn<4|An+JVa5##>#;cW!T-naP$4Ae7B);f3CZE3!XtHb(RRIB+-gm57?I{|9au|h zH1ckkjO?YL_gXi(LUxtpM}or8L>j}xJmRB{#S2O`akPH~kO8n|z-S}~$fMQs&ZWk+ zSYyNfh=P_N82DKuT2b+iByEUnx1x=T4#L1xT>sRslAL6rcv0W&_LIC1Yms#@0u%6?5H*SNK(>3MCS{UCo6>VW&k3a#h?C#q zJb1U-&z(6bpFS7u3!`12vkLPM5%E;CE&%!?3G!f=ABydX-{a(lRcy$vg2DxJ=p-S; z(Y991rYisWZ~BZbPlyE{XLUW2 z#oh07xPUqLRD#JufMDHR(f#KKP09SQ02` z67PREA(g^f=wPV?$jl$a8t(qLb33J}MeJG4>ID%BM3?1JNWio|6(!!#U$B?(_ndcn z=3JGTqS9}>5OMk-W#~jycS)WG7Y3d@B(SNUm!OtVVDO=;&n21+D9Ci{(Ch3%{iGRZ|aE4IQ zg$w01mshmniBl zYYf-~j)(1xjGE8h(9XDfkWEoqQe5{Whnk+1H+>)TIuSUO!MI$T#BfRVtqjp1wQhe9 znK74<8|7Ql-2wW%10yKx_e~k4yFl4>yE0cGoGJiC>g|!wQn=)=s;7qWn@e;SiVD!0 z0BYs9TqfO=O@$L4FL-L*ahHoJ7&4#2Vq7P72%H}0HN%Lan~r-|z=x(64M|u>ke6zX z68A7ZNrYsB5GwHoHg)Cvm2h`ifuesIg%4_))7R1)!a1X6!sA7R@AGQ*nH2`gXxyl@ z#6fFt`;Pe60)MtXbn6jA=-*Z6|2#xI0ir#^;4STkuAQWQnU(!LI*f@fGoS{N27oi1 z3I~QH%10yJA-E^Q?ur}LMYPLH2k(L*IsdcL#P&*C=h4Z&?hk74tRw*O+fskbpwHyH z%qab2+hw{Fb$cjYbwY1m_tU6XC(xRTS`2w6VBRPqajdTcJ62O@vTjC( zJChExIfAkwQf+gQg^qIX&s4%?G}%6{_+-t9vVp>=bei++ekQ@Cc9N(CvD_F6`B?`3 z$&F5=^S^XFoAJ%yVaHAsOb36mk1aA_K3c9C{5d*$hv+2f9aua#Ehpvl%n*@+j8K7i z=~BQaqq}jg%f;(!V7bqlBO(>BN^4g=DqVh2piXt8EB!+$zzPyMHpvF4Fpa@EYaWM4 zTmKzL5EPPf;-Sxdc?D3U4sDaS=aRR7Ir>@cMtaYbgHi@4pV3>1+F+3DJ07tHSn-jD3m{z0|WYDfqVfv zO*ekUx$6f3OUu+Jfk_?Xss#-0%qA|(oTw|Sske|82eT~hJ4?UrT^)j*eXG=K1-zMq zMzz9Duei{y<^aQtUi5!-9<5IQFwayMKxg&x(Bkk+P5@a~8%#ft!Ihhiby3+3l2Ee( zW=?}^zIr3kCTjx){@OO(sFoqp=}`*~f5ge7feL>Al3~B2;f`RKB{n0>or+LO4u5mGxT|8WG4|QrjT9(n$KKg*>Aat8uR5cdG@2QL*#$U@^RAo%xVW;&6(DWd7 zOjLbd2+jWVXB_(e|9{hk;$NI?j%-|c*meRkl%HnSQxcVh(BmHD`%ih&wu&%0#LkGK zt-$@HCyf88(Nffhef|6FYZP|a#FcI=<%9+uEv`$+g5>{2J zHmRE32jcY4b zwCV=Jh--gqH`H6i@qMDSL$mdA2=3vcXM(Kk^fgV}MuG!1#2E1HRf0!m9&uzSFLnDC zAd!E*X#xuIoSw}+JOrKr_Te{!PRviFNE?|zumc6SRrHxz6BDbu>9B-k@F1 zyo_IvZviDm=>;e=04C4p8b}&(u2BPa%*-A-GZ=rZJ!p6TEgQgKNddWaXYec~e&bQyN1ta?CnF9ok zcHMi2)zp|vE2h=o-v-;W!aJx;TG&eGsQF>_fSdipf~D1%{uE91&uJm<-=vOgo!(bs9p-Ste(gc+#UC#KR|uhFlbd2rj=Ceh7bT zn#5aL1I&FXF56|>?R>t&f7R8dGjDC7piyK+Jb+RP&T!7T%DOco;ZmAead#h2_F-=q z{6i9j;2smUr6OmzNr_% zBKafXdPGc2J)ZS$pF6nX9uqKAU%{pI(dyUj>cmoSslpzWr++br_WGq?cUG;PMnmbS z-i$TiriP#=z$7g=Ex(U~JvvTf^zm^y3uaD8`#J~6KhA*&`ITn&Haaa}FF z&=pTa!yItt>72&>f>aHf+$ZlupLx(d7AvT*u3cy_NyS2Shs578b;=#iTICk=>wVI0ah2 z%puH9BLWMk5!DZYmRptJN#cJu4HlQrm%&+VBrZ~q7UAX8b2^lam7qS-V*ZSslfp!v z%&Sp>pM`7D-7(r96-k3ufMVFprV9vB;iIGxHFNVOK>~uw=6;ONOV^bDz_Em5v7Ie5 z8AiDm@YvD=QwkI;IA7Dwm?`al&I%VZaizS-X+7WhvL@&^`ek=O=^TH+Ix`c@)4;K! z97DL#P=M?t*&=Gk86y|$xbj5}wXCRYoo$u~HefS};xx1Djjq6$iuj+OsT$Ko*}wsz zWJ@vz_kG0hIF$TWS%)LeOhC}{H5P88YGT{X}?acJf0V>k7X>Ou}d zzmP401pGy=>1xyCsE5$2kDev~+=kukB#iM34@{vb2{I9Cf`F!u-B`wYYQ^q#Q{Ou} znngGYHo?6WsFkr$s*^T}Uk&hQ2lSIraBONtTMa9cAi0rIlB$0KnNb!6DZxRZF6Ffh zl8GIc(mM}+Ajuokh2q*MTsagH@gPIqX!vZadgbSfE?I`4z?nuX;Pexv3VvK`(}D5X zoL0R$#IEv6>;HR*rslexb1=~mWR_oQiWvd7oBFx z*yZk29L9=^qvL;5D2#lVaoANbj5$IvP2lncVN}~;@-$fKj%q!f?ttZ_frUU(Y5kI< z9e&<4d*L)bpMx;Ti*05`k4gbtK=WCn^T(V&_I0UaA7u+@-JSkLAee3=zrt@s(@qTc z{J|w^g3uyFPYqQRHv*i)QWuZKB#jP1W2*I=(X&r6yb6ColiubK{8-Z}SIB~UK*BRg z#klB%CX)XlPi#yw7%b7$dl@$HFa-YqJ;Eedquh}GR>b{Ijhittu$`;fCV%7Syr2iQ$sggBTq~Nb zYoLF$+WQ5w=?+5sfzY=RMTF44egeRAC`ptldkF|=|0Lt@XzIv6v2l%czk^PTf8E0( zh_pqmkv65$MoyB18V~TT3nGJduh(T00XtK2a)Z__31y^&p?|tI) z(;sgbxNNmPDg@|_`(XF&^C)olsN84$LT!H|gm?ymxrags!fqv0-_mkXE?Q;mNeUAy zfof_q17fnwmo$-OGOx>w)GHG0**WQYB;E{E00Hp7P|J=;)eU-(Crs_Bt2&C0u1j4D zgoYViOc#5AfHSppP&aSDyI=E`z!`dXR`6G?k3I7&+`Jjyjb07!G|C)DE>~LzJIjAG zqXiD-I0>jK)Tjy-CKiPdb_u|B-8hX2!uFIex)P^#AHIl~ht&S2eDmN*8sN;NM0^k{O)(7PhMa1bYw9a4BQ+m(L-*32YM5;&&~BgM;o&Rh)GldlZV(~ zF^Hp7ieJ={OeAe7KMh~7oNJKZB0dBk?5^TLOr*M9b<d?u{0m+pU1)WkV4k854$u%h}=pxftB)%4xxQ9W!mh`X9l;{7Jw zOS3t=HQl6!bOrDZ@s3YW#Yu$j&kIr-|kT}$R zFL$k$!sb2C#D)1`mjdY)|K!f#1` zv(%x3dW=AigMI_VSQ6W{a-qGd8>!_mLfvE#7oVOdhdffL=7VvvNp5zjqoOph9!9O! zhX^IBc1AoZ(NH1!^kNz%95WgyWo0bQi-bzR$Y%;XXA*;mg4xLZ-pp*#*C`sIBXTp5>>>i_Q$A(u#-r0$!`yb}a-D>o=WYEXqxl72PZzgqKumaEJZ~pv^{LN3U!rxRj?D^;4<3}H{hTy+= zoW?YbxtOr_gob~{w)FWsZB;j=FX=z|_u>A1e0>r7#h-iO4*9Ka zWpSX3XhpY~R7eg`Cl%V)Gz^$d5j~-aCY?9LorD_%vBAJWsWL)UQdc-xUY{k+7$gnk z=|?Y=odNB|h*<%jy45Bm^4(rFo)~{>ch}~@+=}_@hF5=9PE@=*@tYUc@+OTbxJyYY zr`CRE$t9jRhE<^K)*)4ai#fH_;${380lTy>>M3D|s$RZ@mF>+8jPj=k~g^gg7i1$nG!9Zmr3_+u`5<>3B z8rnGe4atA0O9=l~Bvm$Av-c-~eQuHLCUsIcYO?MO*Po9+!}usybyV(Hrb>IBI2ZGY zm7sL9@vGbK1(J;F)W}K5n4dU#bp-ux0eC42nZnckeDzfvBEusdxdCmp9|eK6bLXt3 z%bjkncff)=mc^$))@B*5P!vMFiQ<48b$weF5CeY;+>hwDe*2dpB>>dNuM+9A444Y1 zrP7H2kIpz0{uJ|{zDB-1y)1BMy^b%o+hF7w`8v@V5MEL*vLzflup|m&q^Zt~|2=}z zU{%0p>I0gQ>78z91I`X7B6U={xWx*M>WCJQ0vaRA+MymdPK9P1{4DQ15m)0D!ERb1f&31&~29IlL75Iqk-km814YH)y;t=Sm zsCSLn@Tn?0OJaV}!~%gy5Y-_S#BwhEVt&PUu-r*e3+wY8@{zV|)gwUvR$!{O1DSdI z2q%>I(tMs`(%2+gfgVtoIFz*;GqGQ6_XU5kv4CgwegkZykcAlxN~7d^huzEC7>GWD zx}ksU^iLr&yR~yRPn}jeO)|{2xcsnoT&wm;O!4Dk`$S&vcVb57RDd=e{}#7dxk@S> zZGDWa>c{7F%*5Uz&#V4!aT#0PKque9)r#>&ds3ElWnlDfHgsoc)@@4 zs)OX6H8e9w-ra3|-KPXpV&KRof@}tg_$t)nciuqioh7<+5HMSVs^u!Aselpn>xs2T z662{lkH$G;3hUx=!kzmc>L(2M~@#Cw$$TpC(8%DbS&k028D#&|1f`` z0q_!PcKoo9Omxs~#C$_Fzwj!N^J8U3pR6M6@eFJ2KF$Weud-C~-d<@h4wCM2gC}AQ+t0#zA9ZJ z2}$~zx9Vbrhy6ShEJ0EM6(kUFUC8aqcSR7~9mAtU22~~SQiay&{~hGXD^XUBA{T|e zA{jlC<<>GsmA))0m5p=F_8^OQN%Oc9^OgZ$?UihHRPc94%h!f)_jq!;2 zORJ6Y!lYQ4;MlM}!A*b)LLz@v!V)lobazZ}+uzqi`uQb2q$>%EUa^PtE)(qBZqvta z>Nb7!v#WHQK3;a4{=PZPLyhz2J2|lmiTsNsOnkD4U~mpYw1&EGvEA|R9rNp2%-6g1 z(%0Un#8WTkIChv{+_|IieZaYtpa!HdhN^8gSQ7>w!k!LU`hhAm7Ic3wQI7utl%CMh>IxktgOA-Vd6=92s;*~&s_Z+K5Z1)78@*|xDY-$Y=@uK+9 znHcKlq&G5h?)%gK8U-ShoYnFI0n1hrAf-?S3I(cvN+Jm`Q;vJL%3#id-w*jkn=(}` zCh@Ni_1X*5fCrnJ(e!^aoIjnP4=*Oce)yU7+_k?iR^Q{y?4g6Y`j>9KcAZ4?;*yQT zK-n;9bZBmWrj2iO>_rr2>;X&lxd2)zrPXt(d`9b9kykio!dr0{cGD;!M;BKv02f8$BNvm9dAY9Xsi2%M?9Qovi3 zr>*)=Dz$Ay=nQuINk3KgPkrl5S*9akL^n2*#YHtI^eBG><*O0Y(aE}Z8;amGh>@sX zT#(?sv7FGHni^^RL~9a;fzlz8?l0iU^6)g! zpa3*KA3lG^aTM%T9L>!f0|}*((zFOSqSQI*`Basv7Z_9cfetvm;H~b=j`@wKZyoq+ z5vG&4WXcR=x^l8Av*IRVdTCKTJjSzRHRAK^(=S0*Da@ddzmignJ`xJ@C2EE0KpXbl z)}5Wk`q)0AC-N%lEV*=I3%bZ{&N>$4W}+x&R)5GyGF9KjN!MifH_=c{A_ft| zn%ypvddSGErWp;ik=#BM1eUq@6879uJR$Da$)TkDEZewvbJCZ-2Yc8J$)sKsHCFX3 zeSm+l7O=k*a6ompre|9}wM_kx3xoD_;IADABL>tz_N*C?{9kzeO=nyecbFUwe{rHu z0rJaz>b>eg-+B|`xxitP?%Y`?ha}vejVo1ib#K)7v|Vwuib=2KNB~`)E_ET@(NaUPZD%$ z;ltB}oFU3UM!Vv9z!QjLrY8h$)u5hbgKJQ%s*x4^kgNs#Du{+VP2A>o;r^Zl0o}+n zlxa$4A`H|x`@=DiYE;jLfH;J&g;{?tQzgneY8sdVY{QMN#YoI&{J_rjaXnOKA7HfP zM%iev5u=EhDjm4G4PEiTBC&KkYzBrUPVFWY2;t|%Id?Qz(}+Z{;TH-)c}_ilL$W>y z?v`%ClN5v2DEkH)g>`fjTZYuOv=p@%FlZZ8076K}AG-(|hxr^2MoUHXQ7?aNLK-zb z66NnshNn))>@tbHoP=<>y8@wqm{3vjLSGk(D`iz;UCR>u%8;LP=I8<#Y+ZfM(?x)5 zoN;PQVh5}t?Xc~kKEMr){X0LKM(0<{uv?Z~R}ZS5`-5dO!2)Bp`3#d^Up%1>OKjOr zx)148CW-f9AqJl-IaVruqk4ZStRCo!!@osDXtorFMAJn`!>g+4=!(@*qY#Zuh}g37 z?N`IYtb)dQW{n*yW7bv!s}CtvFey9aNgJ5Sts9tbOLjKM1nos!S(A!oWh3!J$z9Y4 z*kV?&%`nqkRhpcs@e1`IWuHXZin%^vp>01Etw{2=xX1IEETB#OIUyjKgKsEpz9*-^7rcll41A0@P;lR_SSTSb z(enXOb+-I?4z6pGxGE2{aar|L(Zn;QO_XI852a{^@Zj3VSml4DqhJ@uRJd7`Sjo1N zBT}lJLQPQVkg5XD5^|2hzAWZ0a5Id83Qx{!P-g)Ls!RRoYD#Ti#o~l59&nXSOB$Q$_MBbP{KQ2eW^5DvHR4u|&V}^cHx`#r(iC zx&!=9#Z3zLK@;N?PDDgyGl>~fz9QMhT!x$OqZi?NH7FcimFhcm2G7{I;f3mSCL}qD zBoHhlTX>9Rj_YJ^lo(V{>m!4a9F>NQ_9+iSS@B`s>kN|%jlLYLVsw)j@T}(QQg`E9uoY z{ejkUmHZ)4f(4l?v}FgA=?%ySW;ya8k{?=;8gxS%wI6Z_@TD6?m^LukZ*(QyeiR^? zaAJ<22aOX@V&0w<+P4BmPfjsO_Hqo)&EM~cI$eJaCzSJ2Xv|xnLz&nGutkn>2|B0| zUlP4T-5{pa;-WkxAz*mT=$CRmEGsF4YPASw>eWTqivJG)0RR8&ecO&C$93(m6#Uc; z)btT4ijrsG5eSkn1XB`iNgt4%l~tXitjtng+S7jWtDp4)gkL-(;phOzemUUVH2fp} zk`sSx?Y$!+v#KvMT@^jm)C0k(>bhlQ#J;Y*)*<#;VC%XtrVChAk*f$#o^FexJc1&? znH5`%HR|S~%RCS$pwe=m`qb|4Br`8NQbRi_u}ZPBpK2rAuNcOKPtsN;QS z!6TTLBVcW_Dgx7#YV2U-D$HQ29+nFmdZKx=q0d_e+l26@ZTco}D(aP&5h)>EdQ2u|II8odaOudXGjB}l<9ode&&ZMdW82#A76PMPu zO@1+UY@5Lt`Hg4iG6q%qDQOAqz0#6T{(@@Z+R%~Y9(ea>P-o5qyv}ThoWfi zDL6*=3K}La2{mFr8$#QCI;b(%ejL%JB;}W50{K4N)l^yR?A`aE78qvdnBjjA#rcs8 zhx)~0tZ$Eg?p<||Q4ls(sEk;bi~vE3aa2#Dyrs*VvEdmad7XOI(H)5(%^4uICB6dzV zG0k8KXSUvvT;Q#g8T)QVkBmo>JsjCjx9hU5vw4(q%||ZQ%w82N!ZX$e3)Dm^DAGT0 zkxdp9>TfZx`-lQ=UR2}7+2x2&vn)2SO7Pd9lC7mY-Q->u)q1p$9rbN1)o5AGSc z)yef+iVSm3t-~FO^!60S1)4m}zw)Mmr^yABzivgR%|2&qx)TJr&fW`hX$*Y{XIY$6 zv&m>N09P|=X~EBsFNl+Ep|fJ~_`whUUc<&4$)Gx5&K3fil@2jf>(Ezvq`k~Fek~>` zk<7hpbLXE+^hc5kW7B^BNVASxbcaC2WSW)oFijPRwz8)nAM>cToC(=EB+R zmr_l<5l<&_<*LeJN2a&VzJUf)>gM*uutvT(iLrhzqBQTk zSc#F$cT{`w79)b0ACKdYLpDEhQnq)ZI>$6>QWnK45;kv~-|2s!{qyx(&?s;gKhd@; z*#mQz%F9*88@l~s5|S#kscAI>sML1>MCH{gwrDG7C+yHiU@E0+vouQj5ydm{hJ4Lw z;L}N6Y*23f0Fa94@w|Zam{flZQb=RPOU%e^Abz|y;%&iAm@bb?0IIANI=f#WNKpha z&VDTTWa>RNN5Oxikwri`Ge5Ps7G|*M@5yeAvsBub$cw0d9^t;ec7g4I6ee@Q}43gr+HvV!a=L*}F;K8At~jLeMi|e@&}; z5j(5zCMMiml6i9!>NdfQx&BqeU_<@f>ujjR^hi=v&4Cakz1~z*hPS|C zT<#aC(R_a*PHE&Tx9jOV+|?LQwuj8BRDm$OkaqhLei4KzO*#Ad>>uq9*{T#Otmz*t zPxF6q>6*mPMzw5Ag``~-fdhBJm0KL;O;@HfgT)+~?!Z)}In|Nc{cEZqS}A5zI&hCv z1(FjWqT%v$wr=f1@5*`mzwYYqd<{~#atorOwMrt5PwiGdGq4}0*v7ID{e2V+ot z|L?YIpkj9!Zf;e{%S za`aheKB?Q+Z6xBEOLYstxWT0GI252V(&HXjH|2`_p^+qfekV!7XZImV_*{SE1EWdG z_6dJULNQV}EM`n8q*ytX##}-PvR(*$72+;k##%u?8a0^KH+m1?PEI*KcdGwLWgh;O&k|+j#!OMD@Oul~A39En3A5 zOz3e0oth?z2*h5@8&a-9XRN!0D2PV9ziEH2dzKwV(&4cP@T4?v=&E47jWo50DTCKb+&ElH#c z*+7#1PT|ot8D()ES)!tXaorC>3(kg5NrarS{jjRMxo9|=uv(#zatR$GpcNbW+(mz5 zpZO>fYK!8AATP~{yYXA%AFIOZ*Kdsjn1m~Pk9837VbTNy*|ku)QL1QLWH+=21btDE zW1H=dAn#4tCh6mF^Zk^(*KO}At`uZT%oFQ#HR1kS|tUP&=S(mQL;yL@PY z*992W9Xt+~F;uSy!kq&K^mwYszm9 zG%7p6QSC)B8H6@)rh(Z!F1udA$R=$fI&*m;%I9x4r5~41b0AZ?`9;ARJ371NYH;r8 z>0P31AA{h41Rs+hhv>B4!imRV4$y4|h!ypj&4jxe%r(-Ogrc5Ng}^aQJ#nz?}3#rc1dNF{$U&@>KL&Q8fd zjigKY1vI0W=vmU_QaIwRn7nl()ejEy)f5Apq-8j4mx8tOjYb!S0XfjFN>Rs!n!P&? z8^{a;@acSm$Qi}&aEVwhhO7cTn81eG>p%4o-_5@?)S;>xVgloL2k1t!+gXF;(Ph1@ z%F0X6uX09;;AG<8uit+zw0O&TmgVq+<^UUwGu~Wx>d4+ri?5zfK;l6GXUp9|1ZY8u zMeJ^`Bv;fe#EsfH=S^y$ee52I2$;%pLU&meBs6^S8-Fr#y$HY!7R1(@ro~wLm_AP^ zQ{ve*{kf|_j@$^rmSK1VDZBh(i6=0GL&1c21xj-|ci(eXX>5c{8sli=?KT`P*qPMiDf}q+E=_QebtE@%Jt5MsLSTtqOzNg8&)@K*i8<6W^E^PMC=w=S#`<717l#@)F6(yT?=0d{|w zNW#mucia|AREkb})y_mnUq;D<%38WdD0~ATlO|%(!S>1UdfWt%+Mx~O+))^%(3r^a zby;Lz-Mw_)vsDFP)=MKX_+owDD*cv`2FuV-q(Xlhmpt9lWy+HJhoPKHi=cQ`U4J(h zmP09Hy0hb6(>5zPJ^*PLGgT2VSLRk(LTJ`Pu+tSek^qbuo-EyB$k)wLH|PKJ3hW*8 znR9^HtpYWJj6D;FQ!*t-ELcT-SyattGyb+JV{_bn+Xe_a@$&8qU%5|N$Y-*^+^pq6 zRzZKZslVXE)8i?u8_B{LD5$J+ag#6E*&AvJ>pIzPCCS~pTW2Vaw5zAG9(Ju}bkbZX z8RMv?!?Eo)_q0jghOnTwhhOv2Fk{TO{kC*)F0-~2i{(WawO~#Q8R+9-JVBD0leV>U zsq=)iE@oNBi;eg$BCXSRt#megWI4prfjoat3Gav3cr|S7MguO+|INTFFK#ke>m z@tw#Lwz2rTPFBTOr$C13Urr|8WQ(}*6??DBHPuN=R=-Mm;g{g`_MHnZL7EE{FlEwf znq3XZ{F)O8$Vge!5p0aRz{}eC)=Pco|_ZMO(7hfz^dV zfi8teId&7fq{QGi#`gc+_j9j326;A$2~-h-W9A)+8h={IhfVO{vRNwksm^1z` zWOR~VR3^LRExvyH%6Z`Hx8RCJU&JlY(%tJ-o7E=kYU5LI-cYtv;#&?h>BRKx`GZz( zXW0Cs9bxn5)3CYE&O80Ty(X`UtVR6me&*l(%};-%L2UGjs#x~^1&p-aTNXw8cYos| z3|m?ICb)~h30?$)9(>|rcn=iq?%)pKJYGyDA&g*yjt?FH11V-Zk?|^=Zfc*hRBc%mRpB6gZq0vjmzh)Pi!)GYu}8i0 z=e9P+d4Z8mlU@;ks5^xw#}cy!f_#Ds$%gL6{A5PiJ@<1|SAmTO`v$>Ra3ZtrmD{4n zF;}o~rm&k$sg`0CpZxXk{;<90x^ez0U^9aGPgK<*O;ncmTVu4$IHgpQ@mepws9G36SKW^a#ni%=;nU%1DMtK<%{%wMA_vKI0hubA!J0B3(L_oZvt2LP4Z{_x6; z`wjiRB!vX>=}}i>jEq|s-GHQMPTI*U=GOhpL!%&f*Nw^?nCCu!C8-Oz9%5OXiKIKx z+H&{HOR#_O2vJYWpkg{YdCAPeAl~&XFIyn}^R`rlI_ap%?*WQIN6)=7cr-YyA_Z1| z57nUxQmOz2CHdVDgb=4dQzpITKMV>OcdFB=*6fZ}Ox6 zt=oU(8Kxlyh+yaO{X?z3&4R7g)<`tl;r{Tfc#Tj8#ufC6%|ZYR!dxjVdBvswl+Y#f zBZnm0?LyzrJyZ3

EwPL_dhSiOZ6?it0L5@id6slQ9_}RXA&<*IB6*S9(kw=T^xY zT0dgBZXirFF;HvGx}vXjN2{zQX&v-U%S?ZUKPST^nA!t&gXN7bX!%{z1eG;yXs|0-M5#nd924H_|I9H#FAx zE^6;flzhnnB%?%+GbiG1z>t@VM;F%^30z|ZR8*21SnG1R&ThH0a;|=b&OluUcDsK& z)f{ZqkK-|$e3+x;AZ5_MK1$_teG(=1jX9W_RkQE4rQ+) z=O}Ox2!D)GJTCJ)BC^xCc!ZpZWi-u8A!rM60q{0nHZzy-dM$z!^}yRPj_H5Mn1=!7 z%d86zxze32HFC1(D@2IOI(*y-3>xLFHIAZwN|asjj#gCK<(%n6e#JTEK!(PT_5=@$ zW;ho!Bt2&C;v1N2r@B}Xyi8P`Z^dJ4G-jfnVy}tDj+vk0NYuskdA3lNYkd0$Z#+fY z1wpm#Qqd3;!PgGOw-bQ##DEA>Mf{<^^ zUYE@}GPT=*^k`=t+6e8lv=*~zkGR;TFo0~`v^kRN+MgW4Tv&EphoXjXEyne!wx9_B zhRIpCn9w_!`&Ma-=`Hj{>HUkKOercBkJk&d-8&W`NYgl=Q@2`=`m%pH#!eyE5{tvk zy&g>`(ZLL5KNhA0ScNA^>bov`jTl_!+h4y~>FY;UTT*F>N8r5RwX#=oZZ%cyt~&Sb zbrB0Wq@)*g8{#6Xkhav)Ng=raBe_(ER%LM||h+?VPR{;&w^+--Gzi@HvSe$<<#bG;}#ql9&G=`Eb zo~-LcJ}aeg)Rf*V5ykVuC?uq5vxQw@<0#o8uqat!>D>-ba{W?|LO9aoO=V1v?o$Ri zRlcreG)aX}y8EJ8XQDTW_lwOP$AN#M9n(pRi}l6r6kJLSC=-O!1r$iosAI~(QJ=Ql zkn6ktAW5K)3#5O&d%3=n!YeQ>aAuu^7M&;nsPy4;{>k}8=lL{n{6_aLUtQRO%h^#D-mV!d)EMJLwfl1U z(8`NO*Ot3QjWXwL^FXcO6U+caF*vf|k2yFnk2;?7po<{PtA#3bFG}e;vI#uO=oANS ze-m;B_9KrbF8f6^AOZTwq9Td|Iv-iRV6jw$sXFX`HgZJMqq7_pwa8B0ZKq1933Jwe z$l7Z5ZR3A_c@hG)*~uq=`{U0}fl)$>x1?U>qbf_Q)~pWEXftN*%&OA&u;^en#_iaU z^CnrZgxuY~Si39zCi{KXH)&!lw-buwjvuOt>pdn|TB{G^SF_6BNF38=@8MR_(oz+cAqSN}=QLI4#$D z$Uc8tW>9>he#Q`3#Q{)p!4{y8P(dndtBD+syZTD6MY&cLbx@jv(k;{(Cd{iUqQKzp z;8OYpiu!|kHny`41A4t!Tb3Y=ly!o?mXoHtH({rsITur(kVZ&BzN21D)aIlm(G&^i z0AT~W-b$)75f__pg?RIrmj@-15?{u87;%3WDjn<$9GdokaA|gxmQK5AIgy%7l$ZfCLl*$8VWCr9YswMv7zHMvKvq?=>%S2D=vhGkMQId7C~Txj4jlZRaZv@R z0a>mJxM=(&LX*?Ey^Qc3twd{K#4Te#_(vWRg+#~?dG5W)K9W~tB?~h=Wf(rPd@p}C z+3qBP!&W9+8h%$0OMx1juJaEy<|J+ z0{UvZpbC4Bi3mcD+qIKQMdV00(!g<#ju>6xE4iaGWwktMPOP<-F=Cews3#tc-W`i5 zEDNnv5FVH3(%R9QhM)e_;EgPfU+#abXt;ZsfvL)QPRPaxtX~1`_=FeX7|M5}Kw}LQ z_g4#3{hxhX8-MJjwe9~H+S}4iL0|lMwm+)a7Q~>UQ}@2Z6sAF3D9oO|HwEeJt53|_ zJ=QX5GD@tdAxFSmYYn+a32nzfkiGj4m!}#~xfov0<+9n_Sm3hVAKGR>AH;v-o5_qi zvIj1YcPTrE)ksxJW^$oTm4lz@5E={vz$2EAQJ-V5i9H#h$=2tkj(bZevbd9wZ4aoM zv~2c5#wm_?-7w5#JKPq=nXv0W^`l15W1PagDwYwQ-^^`EXF%OgaTl^_M9&+y^}_ir zC>d_jZu&$s=aN` zY+OVi6pbQa_zym%x7erbF2b%4zR&~wUYgRw{bKr(1FW(7fFpwsxd&^^A4wd49CztZ z0?omKUVD_+Z0+)ZbynSih~7Cfi1^1;W}2?YL9k(<<<9#0!WRyb`74yZllUBIoBFbZ zu1mt$P;(ZS-@6EFgIj=dRhrV2$WACiyqH~FZ5o#{yulcm%JaPS_465#dvE>hcf$53 z+D#L^4kHo+eEE$Fv@m!sLSiU?Vdxm3GUvR+6P%f36Ed#|vg zHtUfusvH%!AoZAVs(L;iN+fbRxAv58*k_Auvv3;TcYepa9o>6nZ3-N7RTJdgjIWtJ&xF?7PIF)ub`(o(T-!G5^CR;0DmLtag4G=LBo5fK~r(87@V^33?v1yO46mZKk zmqT!%!QER@o}<_ge4(>%ebc&(1ok;QZ%AD7yOG^v2a*#k1QgYOx26?G7HG^)vH|@J zAJ-!k6cgXD!=4NO$%vBTbbjzfNFAQYG8D#8HHq0}jZ_;)+Dmz&g-9LK*oLUef@fmN zZMTD?*h9}wB_JwzOti*)L;UbuTE~2)z|xv-Zr~QLoPFL7D0E?ey7ydUUDht}rS1uz z1WCu+nl{H1Iq2|zRR|r#p5wW4?Go8VnF;D6R)9+wB%+F}E(L8C4AKQORw}@guLlJl zK>iw>QpH63TOTWldC=4Bq^$h_0&ohPD^^`T=L=3{I*oAaboGHY`@^6=U*!f{Nd@I4=Mt&D)#Z^>vFVkE$<^e9?+@|1#Yc|J__o#mB*Ewh_lG##j%tCD&P#+G6bJj_Bs%bX}+ z(_}lF{ZhjD>+eVib2ZBXf#5uHVlw`In+eDLEqaEU8~u6iuG@r*<_7v+OnCwUEkEHa z?_WSzMC4BH~b*okY7uQJOZDBJ1pfbtznhv5aQ0XS8%T zzSR<9g!R1fD&sY|W6>WJYus;*V%p7lXyxo8jUZo-y@r;_FK!VL%Wl58F9 z9=a_@x(x13+?HpO9uDDZTWJmQ zLwaWo)!6vVUWk{>`U{zg>PGMig_M$FP;iCh4&-zJYYaMQp}-aQYm{=`6zMYf=hKW zj9I5On}!0lTF>51<;{FG{TPZj_Y#I2{dwi=xRReDPU&>iU{oC7^N~K}L1S2SxId=4;>P4ZID|T~?W+3t(A7AvG ztfnhE2tmS-wM%L?Fh;FRahJ0u=-Vlewv=A9<&MD;PC0f_bO6Dk8*y`5myoIV!sccs zC96pY&Ac>W9j_5Trd`UeyTUYfn~q|C5-o?e59vcw_cp_x4r}9V0qj?@B1ZB04B~Z> zObSA|#_t=K7)g<7AryTmNFIDWMycM#74#fh5Dqxco@7;+6}o)@nHA_p=qj1Q7jbgs zMgm&5Z>w^tg(qn?A^GitvRYkK?M>aC!i_odL{x5+`t&2D! z@yb5|F_PkDL=D$xS|Ao&q)Rf}LI_YW&?r<2`9+cI*e(@L#@A>ON3t~zBzG3y860iT z0R%h9)TWxqBBav;I1D$GXxcb`f3F#kihco=lU@IxOO>k8{o$^jtr=rXqjV`#$)epR z`|`Peo$2-l3E##!&8(I}GOA|Jns()aThk74I}FqN!UU#(pZ*HF^5>#~TK5+qe-w6K zzxt*%&<|u{m58b^Iy%;M*zeR7*wCD-%?#zZ2!qE?xIKcq%-f$F7; z=<5{%rjA5EgdyMFg4y!{*}Vab#n$t5uu_T%iToycQYvN|p_*gGTjjvj z4;+C)rz5G@8$Xny!=vyfA8N8`uU*gsCk~GRhk8laU*Kj9r$luLd{s^b3WQEm1fYGO za{`I6MFs{=_V6RDi3<{cZE(ez$?Lypn;?#x)|u$9Rr3fTa5@)i1bOS0)~JE6+`CH= zP{FU9Q%2h8PpQ|~wgsNgoR#QLJ%Rvof;aZy~mGq^_;lNZ!??1ri@R1UdVOU=}C7%BOnulbVTMs`h6|6y=O zbGpwGjx5qBx5g!Z>B%v-^Ine^jA}}Z-1p8fbyFwep!Vk1*Z+@+un>hCpe~5g$72^R zslm(r0GHy!yNO$$2VAOqca!H-S?#vo-IR(P48Q?@mSqNKy}ABVe!-EPpC>upUlw%V znIz6y+E^8%nU78Zg^&@j(sf2@0SZC;@;5Oao|LH(^cVMkmpikCQV$}5?L7^l7zKT( zrE3v(m8VQ@nyIBCeRQq;z&L#rl3*7O0RbYv84kMkvu=tLNq5+=b{e0xs=dCcvRro? z>0u+@bcM_a#hbw23y;v$qU92y$G(9RN7Q-w0!>LWj3xw^JsNaH_z>;b87y9z)}rJj zq762U7M{s}WJ{zi@GLNxI|UMd#doY@=u{5o<=K)2FJeO2-?`*TOemxBT9B zGxeKdpfu{S4zU)pgss6HTYEmz(Ixs?$iR2RPy7w^MoFb%jOEf4?InE-gTeRHGd$GZ ze{SQ1lUD0oMTx0Ap^C5Y3xQrM8cs6q>UE>`R*px19>x_pks({O5T@DVF@_|VBY z)AZgwS>fQ4RAL`>0BO>*X2d$fbd{A4iq3P{i=_e5L1oQPf*D+tOO^L3ZB7tX)@Xtt zez8r{%Ae%5dWO^{AVTo(h&$&l29ex!F)fHh;nV1?Bl%ZrFfjtBzFtA{RPG9Vd(l(6 z*sV=}UZ#w~q3z@6C~OTp11`B{*+bV64*}1@APuyOF@L;RmKzYcJDH>KlBy_ceKL28 z`1+CKiDTzQ`}9s;w9oIui>BB3(A5Vo+NTp)*Y0wV%%O8lMygP#M+!7SvT!2TP*|`LNVx%Hf+9k`vNcnI){{IW-%imCs*@dQ3 ztaPp-Z4mh^hI|~Tv41;ib6ghH8M_eWkV0LW*~aF)RlhuNZTqqE$5RfCvZYHb0Z1`G z?jo}?$u>z$@Qb;aD5#8B1JfjX&>rc^9s9Kc{m;BI1w({*&xvvr;3c8uRNzm+IoxkVk=` z|9+8}M~1{4F~4AGBf=nUOAVpeKfx`|BaYK#%ULN%c`=!ZROO4#qqj<=_oI@`zR3}! z*nZF}zmLPbHElW6=IWp>!Fq_z4aQ1;#!I$A6BY~dX&y8sBU}{V$nhMpQWG@BSz9XX&(yi)#nyr`5jnDOV$21bZX7+&15arUp2P4Q1*U~g=GfxsM`Bg0hsw9u z=#5*MVHOm68ZQ#hEd0;EeHR9}PakO^8s+>EePI%qJmOk-pZ-|Op=%%u!YQGDRI4$X z-WYFeL-vxQnqzt0Y*?}9Bj!!uZ=Gwdtl!{9CAgqdAsY1*LoDRGxq5Haz zIv+kZibvomNZCa{RY&5MEv{yN%;7Q;D-u~Jon%YO+`D$)jFzGiUKa!0`C7s9?4S^? zkLF@v=tEP3s1wa-JvmyELvja}4npGuehD1v`rie1WYVq%ojGy_m2chUNNc#Lh^|$t zC>Oz9Z3J)o{Aj|WZ;V8EN*j^T6sgE*7ihMexm4-ju3&veru#&2*C+jdb+R!z*yeYC zo?ZV3=BELsn@iqcm{I?`XYan3ZXNPbYDwNHWqW*emnT*vdmeLg<{%%coX1uP@p#4- z(OSC{u@d-8u&s#7R&KZoC=d#AwXmk#YBqYl64Ndn^C#YMzJ6ZNbSw>YA_NiW`T@0aCh}$Wu9E;LLRFm^Kr~%$rL$%_`tALPP!~_Nj2DA zt@TM*-@I>eD2gPMDOxijnCMBFazCeiHv2{`6Q`A`3|+>S;=Yx$QkdrzW;l01zl^(q zc5v5M{Y4SMtq9@jz*ki>3%V>9YBA)L2tF&A8}##hIn)#^oYgX*i!mq783qp!2kc81 ze0CsP9u;<-bs@Nak2D&n_3++};5hKiAERY?`Bh*Z7)|gJ8(R0)1n}wS-J+IzhRMeD z0t{k{iji+K?YTlNK&A#N!aEgB0-NXcTbHp)V0c+rrZlE37q;Ba=T0NP9Mp=rrjb>? zZHs0uDt!0d=u_R{JulyV_wIX*58yrr=Mo5k%?9)AEnFynoqaau<97$qGY?8=`JGW8 za_R;f#6ZG=Yb2ntQheih2=RpmqEl&QFF77x?2-9fyDJRDlN|ue1{E$`%S6t^Z5N5% z=AqpT|8F41=xJ8h6BV;e5X`p|?wh#dNJ%{FLql?^2jW4IGS+%bev$F*#z2^o)T7W^ zopAJSap7`*K$iqP$QcLFe5M*|`b8xnxMyde9m-a92tQqCHDf4! z2!qtLkz^c$e=wETi($|9{D`azQ?qGna>R?SjBdD(O&vHk3~7Hh`h9YKc2weDQv#$XC`U3Q#jmBOvutrXQdAbvqjkA?0plT;-_QwG=yZ+~| zztC^mhQ%r@_>ig2KR>UsdSx$KwfVEZ|EK9SF0TLg@3XSGt<%0|#>e^8XFnF<bI}<5o6MV67g`W;u zLE$E0Xy={bG(DMb)meoqQ`u6gXk;kK0gJ?mWR*b#Un_m*LTk1PKX)-S=a!BNHpAH} zmxD?&dvgYHnF()I)s%J2r6E(2$+k|dwTMVWU@L~RqIyg^ma>SbU!QDEe8b!-2B|22 zT5nJ>k{P#x$TCOT}k!+(YWQC>re`w0%D5 zZRVcfD08uhy80)!loSaasbX;rA}-_vmz{ou#NBlg;+#YKhok7z%hsMtnwy^T+5;qE z+=cdiR(E{Rkg`5TNqVqMb<_YAe3q{6PHm`?OdGA~KII8xH%TX#9(Az< zA)NOCjwwNgh1$;6wH7A*RmmZ$FAP zb*2khfxv&k1lJR5O0cYqCuy$NL5rgCv$W1f0!_<$iI5T%Bbi<;VJrqwQe!h-<Ijdd$=Y2J;Y7_@4g47PUm`m9i)Rj@Floh=+-*)2VMYL&}By#f8Yynn|uEkfH+p} zfrfhr9_wB;ZI;5poa!(LId@ImEi>X?t;XG|0dqF{O)*r|SNAoVWG1a|%S?#CqH;^3 zI7S%wT-IO8==oKhtrfi)5qXW|xR1woeO)hEP}^O~f(J`>kA2@jAYEC1HINZ`@6HP2 z`&K|?&P9JRX{bj41)bt2HVl98B&|ZGE9G|`^w5`V5pNd~L_MFOlZ*Yt4{3$$t|lTv z*|U;}V5d#}2--vUnm9kquT#P6+cF`pJ`FweQD9sxoV)m@6K;?+y z(%kd0^MDFHGYc0G!nl63nm_78tt0pee>~+U9J7SJuQ7ZCdcxmMNP_J! zU~*@j)#Val#C*bk%}KINB{c`(lsmmbh0Z?a)q2xk|ChF715vQzbVHW1>^>A4dS|%h z(uok3%xC-K=tJ<%E6Q@yBn=XJFk+zUajwH2tApr|3={E9MB(EZmbb711-Fc!-0*OBl>NT)@kZajTHiaQn<`$$U^1sd=@9V>6B9j zLS2#UD~={@(>%H0L&MtV3cbI$+BE&e^&3n|H0J}}w&0kPRx3N|BFIvwWXyAZ0wW(p zXt{`>OsAeZPkNmZNl~X`q&)9W?@Cqi%TQk^vleZg>|)PmzX@dO(+Wor%AAj*!1Jsl z1)>M3G*nxE#8_Pj2bY|vGVuC{U!9j+MRUVGWw>kJr1yr9F0h0UnIC43g7%~{5(l5A zyB8zcErHU*L$l*?w5r|}<(@m$x~f~FsGSV5caZJuv9|SL!Pb7ME7F}FsQ;PDfP{f* zEZ?ul3fvib8R@B4JJ68E*k_#mYjQR^&%Fp1XG{5iv8t^~0Iv)1srn^Du8J)5%8|(y zH6#+_=1L+Dn)EtNwbmKHroLJy42ja-&X5I`wM&Pd1?llbmy4c?00MdfbiI6r)QynU zrdttwZLcMHvSN&cVBBLB1k*?Bq4$JXe8NRqGSU2lhPnK@CTnOmP!$K7;$t~C&039) zyBJr0991i`l(N4c25mMlf&O7v7<_w+p)`sLMRB}Kjl~W%(nxGCiIc_BWc*5VI({S? z)gRT4(m%D?1~@uMu-mEEzl2It2hux@TckB9u2oXwwfk!HYDn2f;_`WzG`f@3_t+YD zdgXVNK^}fp>#QYtn?gTD=-HF*wdJa;(+m}Vy?AnrVUKYOqmf#@hde2%?%!$!a>Mv7)}M+I@+|r`gAnG&6g}` z^@#D(qMnQ;!{%V)!j#4PYRNQEzOj)_fNo!dM{@=i*-khqJvWkn z;6SD1R5!kz-wgWPrfSrNuG|Y?P%DW#c3iPY4Mv=S&-8+>%Y`uIf39x=id`vah|n(vvMKyMd{~2STZPj|0qjypGAfW!~ej;SAlFP zTWJ*x{a)eMZqD7~r0V;peV*L?vKiaZ-^@|;b3VGb?8h${h`%Y7#VBa zrX;$AbR34B5^Cy^GPUp$De35c1BDAaAQU8|*q~JPF*>m=?qw0~Fn=@V0387u>&vpm zK%2(%GZf|`e?#-Z{lX!GawGJj>+-cT8zruzu!LzpaI>I3WMU0v`Q#)XPVKpLM08BKd z??=?OmMiW&k55t0{`-%_b07A~4^{-jwF?_b$GMfE8&RAs1qoMCg$stqt&#Dh0IA#L zjUvcECR%ofpO#ErOFG@b{i0k}$@wui@^&dVVEtin$CFA8OuPp5586Qne+MA zZyUO;^K7xwS4w3A&Y;!_>PwwubFsl?qwx@5x>i2Y#h`TVaVP|TtQGEP#`+GjGkH^2 z3}t0?puBQ%&;Rh@g8VIok631~w8S+lnDsX zqU)?`T2gvpnBh);xtx7d4ayWv3^+-$SDwr1jRD_}n^g+jyGX!IcXJ#fNUdjNEyZm~ zRIYu*E4~C|Kuhoj#dz`;&Ac+=Bh+?7TQK8EcJ|Xa1(%vSgYKL+P&6E8$0T~?g8rFk z^Sx^a}VbkCXSTNC1=XekzV_E7wCZq+lzUNF=R*pNp)!0t@dI)f?xK7&AmpyF zbg@I;4uI==f{Zb6o*P5vhcu{4wljoN`v-CWU^KTfP;4nWvI07R5zyu$;eAVZcsH$~1&j zZf5Ex(8_g#BWm-Y+8|#ytr2WZh!e)$&&3jH)7$u?Ku`L~@T}rTz20XuOq*uMC)>Ec5h^|$sH<5f(qqnQsda*S&W^w8 z@O~P9Az#fTCG{Fn6T2|1x_)zM`c{`^Q%P5>9RN60qjup;SU&*0o;R)Y_X^P}0y$b) zn-Gc?@7RXfAv7E02sBOrQO0B()VF!~72v7-IQtNXN8YBH5xZg6L^@(3e|r}t>fQ-G zGFX`HvEL+Df1--0H40+xz!2w-`0Dyk=r*Z;Z$|~k?fnvBt1c`Fa1}C6^CW0Ql6LVb zR9o6`+7eYca*%nAQDIoJ$Q0UBRe+MUM8EHNn}0!gn{k4vfP3tdQI+p5pX}=8 z-Y2Gz*OF2c$N@DN7lZ<&AAbT=$GAp+PzXF7@y8e&s<_u>#_3(`rX||Kc)L#Yat<)# zm>b%COL4yPynrv|>p~CNkiz*R&}a(jmypINMh(uVT$Q`30>|SFzEZ~VPFwh&oP9Re zScy1t7kxCUh!ul)XWbP;Ic*8Cx2Syp-3Rc;wa$0Tm?}zzq~|m-7?ELQy%aKk)s}HI zDd7T)DXJo#q74yElJi&eGQ62UM1B;Ox1}oHST}70qm!d$x#zN|BK2-cf>>=)?gz32 zbxmG*$Px55e`us|Ke>w(?z11=hZOE7`Wqj3`#=i!*_0G6V(T19D7~-Ydjxv8FM!0| zuELG!M{eYT{BUZH$76WArJN*x{NmOrc(USbT9Pcx0FG-hcp|S5~};kX0jp@aipl{`r)M zIF$ct#(_Xb!P7$~4~0JwIUZ_1ROd&t=Ri)$%L*Iz!i!KLZ|v1UDsuF4_Zb`P8h1oA zJtbVn-DH4NRWL(;jlCzCLv^PBzutK4)5H#3W-((yo^?d9`oV;hAKX7{RXC7(^Flk( z9?uyh>XM?EsvsrpTHz~yF%j>;WR(`&8cWC~ts#q4V-%z1|NTc9FsMRk2l5gbNWFfm z#3W{hnB5T~5L199Tetio+v)T1L!yyzU+Kk*4d~nr?#HA3m!`(_t#f~~vTG`rT@jI} zznzo3Z`6f~I)ci1!7aG0aPIyF>z$*q&Y7v}w=VszD(&;B!6ux4l#S76dD-SeY3RKe zczN@k8TCzWY=#0V{|2(Mz)(Za2t!6K|F~|f3O9|@U=MjrsBv0Lx zQ3--}8K=1`*5~MJ(PvP2OJ}kWlgQ9B{e~PbmybP=nmS4E>dT0HF;kTc48s&A^28Q) z_6l%ca*%WA(5-oYM6cIEIT|SDqLoZPkPRW4duGhx6pPYr#LogIikcImaYL7b8{lrp z2D;b03-kpt*XXGzHP7B+&-un}7^R9G>zz|5M&k)apc2YNTD5M8+%?YG&d(}N;sA9u zpGGc*U){J(rZDtw9k(vACT}n{<}P=A)n5qE&2ZV=JX-O8pM4|q+mr|wXnxxOBo-B} z*e9-aiO@ff(%O#Ts4pWO%XoHe>7uq0Bm^&fdzNPxm)TN>7uXqhR-Q=$VIvO~YMby7 zMTFZ6KxJD++$-EDNJX^dF8{chR7d!qH-+T1i<6R=U}W z>YMd>;81mcA@N1s(1d|U73E1G7<6$fnTuh5a1eOgZrD@BEX1xnBL)~?NKu#ZmaWSO zDqctm7P?T&%J|5IecSW|{^8qS$UkB#;)Mu3W_cg&ce9y+nSTBH~< z=0s}>0ftM)jl_cBqgFV}ZH?$X+SU3!L=|BCE>01DMc1kjbR?t=`!?fcQu-hxCr1#U z`zZI@7aT_nc5P07hK=Ue#hvKO=1PFzqG7Tj-a<7-+$J2VUUOT0NiNHP&ksoOlz+rdB;ix)Toj1)TN76zQ2Nyg?KH!Dhn0YVL3FA;w>L*rzEW&FUg8JIRNMm&!yCuMhk zSL`{l+ePHuLmhfTp1N2dqI02(%4z`>atQ?XRr`qc=9U`3G~ciWkhQP$7a zeR!s`lC;FvWL&C>E=t+83d5hZF4u%w6|XN~GDUXB9WtU%G+L-x$>ue*vLQ8p7mTVI zc(q``kRVn}VSBDz?uVT>z#ZtdFGc|kRo}=70mfFh>#^#>6j*}`!P{-2Ju*flr79_j zv;}CeU7q4fi$`R zT`n#?)p0uKup3?1894iyV+8wnBtEvT!i!0}KP@w~i zN6#D_vWAdAIiV;#WlB|nr%@BoazfSvzk+`O^M{3`O}ikfq`Z`tZ1A;z-doXLs=E?} zd$)ov+lzdcPAG(#>o^(qgyB94K-OFpWgYjaS!s#J_uV7bEa)1K#tgGD6^p7UB0aA8 zCOcQ#5?j*BVJh2wI^2Z%NEWX)Tk-Uw$q z`}xsWpRar8K7$}Ii&XTjf*W6FHQRnt(Blvd{)wUz#3kSX5R~hGnF(Ut2Aw097{<5b4r3@?Pg!thCjs{S zlhg2#rSmB$LHE*sQ}S$;Td1@#W-9u$&xJ!F`antbrBO3xyxygrWF4BQx!;}5zBRd@ zi-OA0C{$p<2vLyFR;e|NZ{=lD3BFqEDE*Y`uANm-Affmfu@c&Q zNmedo@G2$;iER`$hUQ_WQK^Taoq_B@8|tIv%IM@7Sx?G;u+hxhmPL%pl|MA>^XGSB zpFh11_WASuVV{38!9HJRZNvpJE|9*jp*<-4`QRj`3%4t1J(+!-5@_?X*4CMPWv#0mO{qe7cfkIZnPN!owuQzbrep zTv*s25vq_3Gn+-%bi+W(ffjyFcAMh0wG(4?1^HWl5Si|*u}j5L`@0J+T$H&{{Pu)- zOFJa#HB37{4my%BEri->Y%Sbf5Cx-TwT;fCrMS=gcoan<$U0U}f)d=qs)eq4 zL^L+Qc_!tOY>+;GW|J@pqiEUxy7F_t##q8d!*zB2ws{s-J;^%nX#0g}lOr;XyJ*Oy z;_ShH(@Mg3N2w}#)>N11kY!5R%<6SPp_)?mMY8i&M=Ve%pLir(hnRTKcDu)Qg-{{< zq1Y``o%e8~vZgNNVqMADdV5qs^oZK;xf3l;q zmqDY)gzg-x2<%HDP7TI5j~SK-edq+?(`7k90HLtwLvfi`2vCv}0PD+aZhYv@{9){> zD%zE3A;vM1+upB+wiFgb|KU{n=nQpo=O$Xg;Tp44^vl=rgt%UA!s$t>eBeYFpbb=hzO} z4UpYq74Lni1jXzI&uM21AzR@+dv0`p8$?3U?=a|Xs-c&Fg70>DTM;)gvQS-=+~hV;4TmDwHkxG^rr{7Rv~PBL=u%xMYG2fF~xmXE7oi2GB!6FSaKJK{T^7>;erb9OaP zi0CA_^+6Y{Tcd6)QDMGs^+pDW_hF0pm;z_ha-fTwY%{gcA*xk(FSJ#g%%!0y&s_HsdHrRz%NSuDvBoAfLRTW z=G^`i7-7+X6r5*t?p^+tVKyiF!l-=Z0vUAjX(Ju5MP2C{MM!&Wa0 z59XK)Dzf-*b_b))UJXX&KKB>I%B5G|lYu=HHrtjeaKsf%+I;JB)hehRtXE`PpItPq z!kz_L++l79a+8%HjQu!k!JQREO(n#m1(Y(M(frdwipyc`%DFkZKdG^}JNc}54R9V? zH6DlD=`4Mz@??bI#;EsyPB)R^<(t}rSGYG1480MS>u3Elmt0~#wJZkFEOMc8H`fBR z3O5!C50bm%;X?4@lF9L*u|`b$qQ?W5iA(W7)-$I7`R=1s6MHc71e_kWQI=2zbZc%r z422|H3adt;W|oMpTQP77MPZQw%7DGXK3)wgCEdKZ{&!BMoVbO5>aRAKseJe6m~33N zP;IUwOvcxI{6uM=zSy(1#Cs(UV76@7670ySM-U6mObv9D{d<;TyAL`7?>YnS{x zXW*#^f*g@vL_Cu^oBy8NTr4oHfai!ZRqBBX%GH9B3sJn3w{U7CL|#rJ_@FxDIlOMq zQMUe;3g#$(*f6`8(XB|yzJ&N09IJu04o^Q#rGpGq$LS z(n9itbQAuX{M4-p8_12oqN&=&f{O6Te639P6Zx&KQp}1!VWGH{pW+Chc=t#5H-DU{ zg=ubKvy|E5TTXy9n(WNVUHAeeO(6G^|B4jVm}+=`ktTPSYT_!;9=2^)RE>83?Uvha zDOlXE7T{=yI zCRp+bu)7am^d|^BJ1cX^smXFKW!vrZ>Hhck=l`!L>&1h|AAj)pp``8v)+i~Q zkri3-S7A2MrdNd=wf-`wPO>w8QE6k50LEfJe1dD<^e@mM(#9`kE8R+exLoD5wJHO6 z%H6khB?QmhL`7*@*o> z&1<{%tm=iCYVZ&w^zwdx`rG2cS6tb*Nans+Z%#9}uikx8zY--}lmgmj3Mkv}!a9Ta z_~VZrKfFEG>a&fO-}FfDjH#Cs!mThFn~)r4?vRxirv;UUF&DZAd+8k0oyyBG%S5@3 zOp3Wi^L%Y9a1Cksr-IlqWTvv98Z-54=i2UEa{f>NpDLZfL4cKi#FI*BPjI`4&vk>$ z1~=5NCHJuE%jsCCi!H_#;1jWoR=O!m&PI?F$J~&GCSX~0afFEkw7o=`Ak@}908T7b zvzHMMz8c5WPj^J4vz`}qgT_Jd8(oL;sTLKcWeNBDFiRK`WA}2__v1R2t*0Wyt#J)s zs?0d_tW?QNk`!lujJqaSUFA(kJTI)dQuNFSKj^wrhIWKh$we&6_gSsMaHh;u#Vp!& zp$p`krOTY3p1(ZX@vIKG+ZD62v9?_u!yAcbuk=_G&mi=};oVuldCScIx)hAD5cBVP z_eovlgn_c#%P(P8(H)l|HJ06v!{&9&>h0tL>%3|r=JYLpk!YnEwZJ{*MJ41+{<)os zt4I|ewf-Au^dpy4tT+0CPpc7#L03c>E==7xm8kHYEq52_HGLB?XSiBSA7#WK2XxtDhr&-udyYVGv zfy_W>1VT1dBZ{ZJR>Ryz?XkeerArYTxd}AZUZG%qEQ`C#JqwJC$i%KZsaZWsyT28n z+r!%zQi;dKquZNTn^a;k4^R^C8pThz?OPtZ%jx5PA}r>Eokc5Q_;D_XJd|yR2_?5fUHmBOI^s43 zqJ2i4z5W(u`s%>*xK1ko+2FZT!eQ&G6aL)EF_$By3eDOW>m}@#7oA@`bGAYR-_itV zpL-O4`U&+;BA#FQ zC9^#HWgG}Tib6{ie3J~Q=yXmDflu;~d>1le?03)W^HV)HK9HgW-ibUd4+#E^3lHDDQzo{18xktx; zidnvQ!gV>8f=uyLoL#BKq*}OtHpBUUuFZk@_T7UMn$^)Hd_@s#>3pyXps<_T%ZVn} zzUb9XStB26)KDnT$u{@-M7`ze7W*n-kgF~?!TibKwr`9AIn?=Z?%pOg6>gFts)2Ak464M#+y{IGHaw1HW?ufA%>{e z`Ld$D%Ua|XhOn&a`BA#kg^FbtbY>?Uf0F=4;q|)iNbvkGrfTmdKdAr}o&V*isHEBzgST^P5!P;F4GP2tHxHvFAE<^l`7*p1cgq#}paN1i z842_0XYL79%l|>fC!~5VkgP@7%VN&c5;Rhf9b@E~urFdt7=c-0GS;Ux%?Ov~-VyN| zgt48O3`cg{i&{JcGtXZgk6@>Nl=o-OgS+<<&I%vjS4r8AT}~_0724xzJB6y02{z-w z<`F+#Mr9BTAF9GoT!miFsv;X0;?S3@g`>%q1)U)4zr=CYO|&K#j)7bZ;$rbih-Ctb z7-hO@Rn^=O2~Xh;bh^T)DcY(k*1dRXfoT^;;yszecdiWyd1*TFQJ&m?m!=p@xSbWu zPRld>+k$)z<@h|!QT%GlB5Nm5$DyWZPP$NbFS35(=Df--3CFf}txxA~&$f-=prXqJ z-n=0DoURP-sod~5jxcnV`8lzR=J=9qou@ddT>~Ac#w+NVGMNNd%BLOU4;%8doSx_k5gVe4Ch=?vL1!6a@83wC5BN)yx^ zh{n)3l&NS0zCI~2M7Y+6pDdzUq`TKM5e@FOC$pUWT6(9U=XS(d2{XqpNg2YBG%!QH&Hg3E(Phorjx$=iXF| zmDY-aM41pryCtqpqNYg^m4zAoHl>a-MPpz}9OkK7NNg1D56;Vfuu?IOHp}}7`LH;9 z+n5%QeJa#N_04^M-LA5IL}1rgblPpxf4E@i24U(*iQY(^c*@8_`zKiB2t-tF?F@qO zc1R|-=l`{cCf0NUuOrPq(CEerMeJ-Sm@xPf;jjICG~ z^q2B7=nX-!n6UMQ0j=z=?xPf^!@@0X}MkH{EekT$<)cH2p|=+fh5Ps+;1U zG(Ptqv#wrznafAEW>xYe0a^I{9q(g>O@QhYvt<=jVZ$zT?# zzx&wKtf5V-ZUaaWCYzq<@D944W>vSxl8cMPm4{;|D-9@%PEd4YG!&uDQyOnr+uAu7Arxno zJ)?L`Alq^I{}B`LBnw0{wKH?7vxo_(BoT(3s$R9kvOyF*&d?w|F+8@u_4LK2b*}kk zud*N0QXIDif=-@?#YjQQ4YhiFU@AotsOR8+-#*5?-Pz8k-*+!1fb1W%Q1EqlHo3WMmZty^^M#VCpvN912loqpu0H0`2sd5%I^HHqji>?r!(<)LEo5v zOjp&QESd(v{b+IiuR40f+V0Yuz4=C?yc6Ter1Qyk30tfIZ0 zK&RCMr#YqNV7OmnbRm78G^3?jQn^SBU4dKUe+T~14qfaDtOe0)1*;JsfPG2Cl7Js9 z$dIuVOXH^o-VQ_mDBVsmSEQW&v=ds~k|+nPwpHqgZ8`UaabT7;E0K8b1{K7%-vn&{ z>~R-vO@Dn{5elF>^`U5}C`k80sIx>~S^;lFwySt}#DyHu}34qPKd8dYNIPW5PDKAb)C?79Mc63v#O7b59`PT!ilB*4Ca7p zFG87#OyC!ygf=Oe@ThpQq;9Jamu%f9e@!k)_H)fbd`}^b4V$AMQ?5ePO)IxN4H0Ud zVR07$VwweVSMejJ>wUUIYGM_%i%?o@xu8ebg9lp@M?mCVW+DTwksynaJG;+Xp&yxQ z#V_ouY!%6fYf?B*L^5ZU;Ke5k13w!Gs*owIgWk%;06yfgzwvbFzmca_I_Frff7}yr zFVHLUCHFKkwuq0bld;oc$!~;!O_aLTMIT(8ZNH~UD{P*$I+WU$69#XgvD+B4+J*Ik zpiw)VTJ0$W!!uu+j!lLh>I}hbQ*9%Kh$bqe+hUFXacI|8C3n9K1bar`h$KY7eJ&5k zK>1zukT!{rChSOY)?%5vLEcsw#-WMwMBJ!}!0ibhx4RYYPChEiOM zfcQ;gNFduFsG11(EjILGKGvj%0*$YTkV^V@5gM1+L5YM+88Kv0t6C3D4w<;+DW%ToU%C$>lHI1+2Pky}qf;eV@LDl7FA0g=ugk zbFirpc}HTu)6uPf5DI*$lvu0{HT+-BUme5Ul284CKN-vE{JFSJXFL(G zJT&%*Krx9#d`iALf9-SBlB?q_;FXu}_AhCBBo<-6-Vz#b&%nv+w#aWKHQc@8$?|d34*V3YUVe8mp zT^IPxhn8g@s3xClkqGY)6OJ4h@f0B`)cb6S`T8ruQ%6{+Q z)2ji)b_T%j?FfKBoCm-z`tJ4r?LB#2W*y>F=a$`Hyr)5C^p3hb8T=a6zaLL>G;`P{{YU$`9Y&n|}TkA7&X z{$Y|G{6r>~e-Z>1ujT09BZU>h1C>$(sQ=L9gKwrmut(BC1oB`HBC&p%LhLlP26o@d zTpB61m}7XItWWL@*>xK-ix68o_`@^WoF>UYde zuU`zOGBt_=zDA;-b$8mTVMubYJPMUxGj8K%(}}6Oe>ZQ}W!@$QF<|nJ=!H5#SkugH zzyPg@84FUUiW2p4?re zX9+R1z|cyR({dM`w<|SZ{!tY6sv`n&sk$Z@>HQK0|run*s)WMM;V!=%Z1iL|Gg2 zEmlF4zNPf9szD%M#btC5dyaO}Xe1nuU73v`Cl+lv5k*i=t^?n490a7f=Mxe&$~coV z$Bnzi0WRhy_8cx_ZjU-LqUSWN%-7@dDT;k5e+B&1D3l5H0UGdvEIM`nK|6d7NJ&#= z{lOalie!%_8tGkI8)u0+c#&i~oO|fzDT9pLPGe(&Z~75vL!zd1WO~oZR$h@>gdLPF zmlwLUq`03)Le<#|8JYraIXN4N2&Bu8q*a$k7Q=U!Q ze@CLYO@TPp86fqX4w(o+wAGp6VnF1nw9(^KGDI}7^|zsY)o(CoeRA7a5H~`9X=-Md zw3L%=g+^Q7Fq5!NW95~ti%K*+l1>#qT71(g(sI(&fyO+Hr87B8kDxa(zF166hxaGh zM#|OXg(|a)uxMp_2O)o|;fMz+3Ax;*e<0xf-sne+QLbiNj^7NJ z0bYbgnEaFV`Tx#OMb$D^We~-bLW!a}7v$T)R*6O*j!O6PxL|Q7~ zL{H8DD=$^JLIy~Q!XcJf17^`;8j!#1zawlyzxYJf^^Vm@tKdJEvWZ#B0lxq_^2-LQOpWAPcmPn61RDc)xk!DNwx)NkI2o_1iWEWV z0&7td40D`ec2{JtP2aZU=Lm6NPRdCy$p9r|7q}SuRu~GFq~mH0Kt@7`Ub)j_ip^US zV$8V7(j_*R1LW{9t5t(ZKt52ye}pkLME*&fl-Eto{q(mq!3Vv9zt*()5sr?WlF|@9 z)Q2-s@SS22;K8>Gwo_`(WQ!tE28C0(JTb1*#eqs8;D4X3kE_*q{vSkLm1x+KooG@LSDNE?nCtK`@{x4E|!HQ1M;c@I|Lgh_d z31DM}8#JlNJT)@XSujJ?f2FbAz6_J_2K}kqbC#iG_pJo!UwFUoEmP}2m&81Fy0C)jt5&qHRzPDE=xWlv<%IE$Jt|e#23|DZ=3P z#6{mpG)t1#UXO&&2ZjE=jya#=Q?V2kza!^ev%ViwM!sMGZo45_B~2J2&a%-9I!2`G z#DTd_M3z=IN@fkoe`pf-{be>x>3LC;=AXhZ)m1BZcFOU&6(Xr>5$JLf6@`M~a;LcL zh8sTcxqTFOjd6bP-s{FVfBD`UjB$Qo-+Zv`08LNh4P$tK^nfx47tZb88gup)lCiNG zyd@Jlf26<>`9xpJ=p$VPB^nc2t~RgBK(b)?5puqPybV-Bf5^=vs<>2&mA#a#$!2uP z%#ibU7~tfjxAD5U6c-(GDSAuKscWCp-`F|4>NJR8iWgD^6cxXvTD7OFR_RZ@eqkn60V0W?vv}thrPn12dJ)O?he95_?t|w{ z0y@`!a@n@}m2ze=iw|{fmZ!vp;gb|0;Wd0N;Lf zQavvV|I4Q?CH{RT7tn6xbKc+e?Y%~h7ybU2@ZC$^P}*hg`0dZ9*Yfk}viyBl75L}M z{r}UpmQQ*7;RhNrPhNii{l_2dc=_>1?|r!I<&Pi#a_7q*J`R^qQH(?3U-zT;8lzim7BfxUc2_{n|2XLYq|?3;4ZR@-;!r(Yc0eqXs% zxhPrg$i~26682O0z^hia>{!T_`IAp%G)L(F6i$r179SU-Z?VpXiz;@6@jnmCx^r>4 z0qz%fYjOYA2qdtyAOVbdho$8qx?kF@rG1J5f80yu*hVn4-Q0b{1%^4gU*PQpZjtXh z|IF#BvY}!NsY8x?y!K8@?M(drQg1Ewx8*wPI4$w>#n-@#^%LyO#Vh^u;2?vWym7wp zDZ9gCnkVtLYybGs;%Td@-tV-j6Z^h*TFkdwmfcJKwhQ~!9RBj)Ed%}Pou22LAVS~r ze>2}fVQGK&^JY-Y+jK{7h=Y9FkA29J-4UuzhG|j(Vy%mXCiYHp^&1w5-I{a$#dC17 zpxCAmb~XuEwN=hjkAmK0ofw0gAEw=!<^SAyE`(`ST^&cNOV+~9G2~P!{Cbf?f0XTr`aIPox!`?Ncjc(={YQ(>L&N%AQ^Whv z?&8ocBB7wqr5dKuQTt9Rx>UWNh25=ca_@NG?I~!cnDxNg$MEixv6sHJO(56z9(RxH z{;dbUH^4M5MaNJY)<6k@+3DWJ?lHbxJhAa5l`aiE`_c~@Tx#L(J?fP`>IcrFe**51 z57v;qcc}Yys1iKVp~7O5kLvud%wdNN!U;NWq{~R8no6~{ad)cczfX|MBs?HTDpu|cIkAdPrcH#%_eeG2i{hy44z_fGQ zeDoA6Mp|<3W)J9Qe}Tlcf2N`Pf0bkSdxyJwnSa3i=2&ZGM$|`L8mp`=@tEhmQ{CUH z|G};269OSvE>opb%3kY}z^~R>^W&H`?*x{(cc#0`lrMU-BnESq^6*3{MQO9;$n9y65yYe{Qbk7?moI z=ui8yb|z=Sf&h+8+!*qyd+)l>jH$>rBA92@0;vdZO3*eJB%jr}hNfZ8^?>g6SC1B7HlT;E&tDBA zqMHy{-uu=A`PQI;F5b0YfBdOML|Mq_q-l%Xr>^^c4BtxCedRG7KmEHhYW(y!a>eA% z`9jW!Ag5^!;ojTs?J;~=*V5c3N5b>d4Bfypm5Vf}6X`e*Zr*#`y*FZAWaD;rREA$J zj;oWglYT5Xs>W^wN)Wi=`~3Eh4){Zee5fGx6?!4}j(7L+ep8Oae-R8jE*PA~%Y{xP zG1MrbkH-LODH5J5i6@~D(L8%Y_?#(S5$zp?_zH>&k| zY{c9bEz!k-eDZV{o*(UK9k)Ee~U1ZTotD9Z22-;LL$1NU5k|8y~o|(Gx&Z=(gE*!{+~4^JgtBX zQJTOdUG`;jNu+=8aNjn^ZRX53C@HYgRz6oBjOy~4X+}Xfdbq5ac<*=L@)7*D?AxmG z<2zkDw0SF3%~KAWH>@+`|Acwwt?2OHo&aa}?Z3mP_#1i4e@ou)h0rHluFG+ChN4Rp zJA@mBt+U-D;#a=C3y7H>Jbv`SqsI>yo%4Q_1_QwxDMOxl(9SuV1ZlL|z|)DE2w)PrkU zB_*1Ql+%>X>4Z9dgqFkjTuFPEc#ClI%Xm=ZXS8CnZ>$RJ>AW z%_>`!{iDTG6=2N4*xBULv$4-yqcPB#AnpX;+{aX(Q!7w*m*{5uT^{I2O(sQ1zsdiu zGa562f65!Q;bZf60sdI_$1fhbhb?;dJ$1SuS20wb36nLYGdMs#7^`ar2^rDi%7iFD zXZBcgjn1GGH`9HZ~csgTt~n)hZn{IfTO2_Dq& z{_^3(-ABqpIvU2#@;nG2PjOIxUsF;j2ocK96HT9`Dh=y-Q7xWM*-{YZ(RfM7;T~kw zf1FXNN4$TCC2bz$Mm$8~AKnCwa?nTktA|kQ&BRF6W3_~;(?DxUTci@avFS2PpmL|! zb_l!qRPwr2|A9v-0wN?!oKz4AO1LwJ2yJ9`euL zjzbkQCO6uI4xb+^wEA#S}3Sdyks_KoiyI(wr zh`a;ueO*38+NiYG?p;;f2RKE zVJu@b+t;Ez2gBEul?u;Ap`nUyQ^{{BzgVEmX;l;Grn^{8|H4GkgKBytk1huRMmp+6 zct07m5N#t%I)Hs&twt?$n91*|ywpmK%iV+ewx$;Db~Y|V6z|UiP4>-#qAVl)uOugm zpdWpleG{$nMH22a@r?p7-bOQue{zk*O{%3ZRoOt`-?72bjvK_~riRl~HzK8FhjyC= zc$4Z%ln|N9Re6~dM^PeSOSzdHldP#?~o^p!+a8123NuJxx& zW@pDz&KHp-cdp&qo&R5y$MO(<=Y$cuz#9LqLA1lGdoYpeT&kk#unf9je@mo#&QRp? z1B9TeyxQKW~Mb3I!87DQNlsLpn`CK+e8Ty$gFV|vx8MxN-IyM2Y?7#n4g zKD@56&$U@}GleWHe72J6e;jeKo7#ObVaP+fQM0CD)z39>lCqjIv)U7U{OA`C8KV6N z&vL@T7t+vVhC`KhUo_cT&Kil+8~kfx)Ano=E($`zy8KesMY}))b#R^iO13cN#z)yR zeecvOfgBe_E)l8Ap>gNzJ8F2`EZ2PK*KN0vQXp!>jA5I3Z~V}Uf7H8G`VgHQwTC`Y zN0P%TfLNeBDxtyUG;Ob9#6BfEL*}G?n`h$+HT7Gkp*q)EtDb9x@NMsWtgrf?z3T-)gmLH2-QmpNu52*7w2R6C7kHV28=dLpy+vJPUk~{kq@wdV zuBbZTwf3^2yUb)^UIsPXu|Y=Q5=+em#v1O@3T(nZ!wQCUe|}x~ze9Q3T1%Rg^csYC zcGaauoV0>~PNE*(i9jK1xl}Zqsd-1}5VQsuN)|0Oef1}~UhTZG`|6xo4m+toH?*Ms z$EtZ2u1H^lfO0uLcNV-ng|T*6#e}S=5;j8(0RtPEhi_Ec`pvN^;;w$|(qXT_QQRS!Y(5~GZTrlQ0<`W;^f8kC2i)P54m-<|_VJ@kkb-xFJ z)%f$4HQKU4i>THX)(j{!QC;3qGnp1jZep?E0tMdaxuIZNHfJp)N;9zrQm)MfF3L6- zY+KQ;(0Z3T3vH&`C?>BB1#NlycqH1QST0mG7LE9k?di3R=uSqqe3L|)nYv--&Ag_J zY*B{Bf17Wh>URq=f)MqpCi%5q-t^j@N#SVKm3X{M@e*>4r!1Qhg0LAYL1$(4V6Won zFxX|qfE}I6j-20hFvzqn%RuRb&+cEWkDUu+DE%2)k(PxN&NeU57Zg+(p@EWg(1qao z*$c$QG#PvaH}3hXAsbvkzmiMGZ&^6d+D7NDf9(9F70`jUsc1XolY6%;{)3A{+v|xH zu8Cd>5r2y8aGCfXy{DN#c+w=o0;Cd0(euo3$zj=f*3}=NpHvb1;$A+M@v*W))!PM8 zz_%}k?))X=jk8jrtdThnb#1jIEVPmj-Gv((v31U%qrZT&P==2%+rtASp9d$S#adi3 zf3P^2iBP+1&GJz(s?Le5aYa1$h6t}idlMWDYg_*%jlt=Q<4zUoq>to`+JFDs*m;9a zW~8V9?qeh^#I-i~GAV-H9((_JkX3h41AAP2B$EoI`BGUvxW^Ei8Wc4khrYl|0j@`L z(s`;W?;**};B5?|2_pXpt?#gu5HYNTYu_DHXABX$(<&{$H9R zAz^`Ug(Hzs5b};w0a7fuJL9yHG%27Q7#oj*lvp1VhtLcz zsK^XA7;?x-?56E(+4`mQ4}gXARz{PqfQ~?Ht9U_=rDx+F(PYmU=}5z%UfTk|f2S%O zp9hM?$*S*lthyhvrpUUYU##l(I2)fEexo1jf%rZ?K!Fa~uW@wqs;s4S*;R-Ms!o8q zni(#>{O;?e&g~Vr8pCezJnjVCfx8>4W0lj_ zSE%*?UrE~)aeK{W2Cy-8e6CTYa9gd&syQ&z&?b}qF@lYgs$uq{ICC7`f7%5xgFo2* zxxjV{P~GTybZ3HG>D8G|{pd(rDc}bE(LLQx?D8`D^XRLz;iE~JTVZz(xy#FW z4es{{x{Cyd-DU!O{I#y0Cu$Wfb=UNs z64sk_!aa)8I>_n?Gz{Xfe+2_nqJqml@2ZX1#b8sRiK3rAiG=vc7I#cODXQ2l&ZOHa z?Y*O-JZ*gr>z+HjNoiKDuNERyasJ8~=&VvtrS=1d-zC6|mp9JyI&Uh#`GgxH_l%fP zNij*}!I7w7Bg^I)0-$yFjDlDKw6%^`1h|bOf+w(|s1PG#!c2~Ee|i>C&uR)K_D{X+ zH||jyc(3<~5}r?WaxyaVo$fwSky5ddIuv;sKTq^Dxxw%bRBU<=M(cH63l5<#isFu=Xzg`pV15bl zOIK=NQwEvTiv6MOe~wER*?dt~S-&*sSEYEv6Dj&k+7y%SGs$rjxoa*SsX1H~uW0SU zyoy}aPdo|=0VM=Dq|l^6LC+rRGiTmUvh%-kme84qwgBqK;7|g|)C{*Y8)R0BNj^)l z99Om02b>CH^w^z_iiVHdlbKvGcDyE33W=weGMwCOmP5UkvZ=1iMDr~3Ravq8Gp&|9riil0%nk?Z2)fVkxD zLj$fOx3}A|f9u&&el_Nc-?m5|`af2%8((EIAN2hx%0Epz$hyKa0hOMO3+z=I$C^>N zR6={f@%EB0%mlzNU}nS01wN@V)a1H_3G874%f_=#yWPz>jD?F((T!+qtt%;T&c5LJ zqNz@+x|RL5soMM$C1|3#mgWSPOID2R2*%;11yQ{gcf<}@o#cX`Rd`H!rj}iMPb(=|((m9bIF3H9PS=qwYE-4CKIHo_e3B)H1#?H1Y5swHsWZq8>GEi%!^B+|g>Q+@K(z!qZ{@n*u zT32J4uBOLl|FBH4_|dUWz5I2{c&UU&5WxDZf6?heW}|a5WMPgMs%lQUEMf}?<=)-# zPl~OZ)(&#{CgG$f{ph#2HEqIJA|uUFI#7iW^GnR7o&?=-ahv+t*j3o65;kc|4%MZu zI(GXXUA^N9+yH`$fLKDw5LR1T{N>7K@b^(Wz0T}0;-MILvpr@&I7}A>H6dY`0GX%} ze_x|x>V8;Pt4{yf6SdG+Yy46RfEA+0A)cUw)302ZifUk(dYlF=5;zx-YUx^)Q9#(% z4MM3m%c6jLm^L2?s2GP?N7Cg?-8MY~_F(8klbmSnvXo|+xGVA-l>#ehkhl(+^*=04 z9XwHlnMu`ztV2go_IrfXmoNb7W78^Yf2ob*pa-ceCN4&SS&z^aczPvA_cRfS%5dJo zgr*6egtPyrNDn0u@PmM%JR&B{B~6&<>n%r@Z+22nuaF5$WObeH<2sV)bk|rA{?U~#f0{z| zRpv=th6WAQb<5|&QL9sD(OJISnkdk?<93^a3uYm0QC-IO5)EZ6$ugfilPRuWJ)I!v2^^*|4%)Pd;GwoIKb#Ya=-j~0Kx z%CE_H*$MJ40BYB5VT?l3!#(Cae=8fqY?;!_=?gt@lW6jyFU(K19koLIEWL{W?oIXaepIvomD!)z0p_2&yjG4RSw79RmAncwrEY zn9XL=JDHWDvGCKsWcf^c+>O*dW_V`}PO7l>3v4>2D8X}DRP5~j;!jA*(WBnDDSM)?V0qeXAR%!OmJ)E_kX zms2L=K%*F}tby5t_~ChS2Qrf7i0F^^2Kr`*{n~ z8R|*1sSiUAj6SQzB}0wTV|48aU|Kto+;<}#`s#8}>f3FlYbzM<@g8;^hc`F_`%9pF z&#fW7i3{JW=91>ua)JwN^E$=^_T%xu#6POn`d=2TDsXD7d@X^JlzMtUjH7iVPalMD zpB^l5fw|LEZP@L2e=(er5n1OJrE0Ir#6@Y992E5tqK`WVg>*^{@KofGp6Ax0SkDDx zFwv4zGcJR3x%>K{;GaDl$WIe@5V{`TT zWXYQyvB1vI9x=}~&V~Dn2NS%=fqhhL626*UR=B=+uEe|aeF%c+$PqS)3mnbl)*Rt6{+Eiy1iqe|~YJb8WOBFf2>xn!9kf)Nv2 zHWR{Nx)VcH4D zhG@G14ZkOX80%$(dwecUEo|65!1r*kFn zBz6Eu-8yjU+XyFt-P1p63lDQGgi5zCv?a^O+{2md;dsvm*VJvsUOkNai=`4dOagjy zoc68S;qQfwmA(D=a7p2Mv&TWe>ui;t|0{w8#)}KHMDlE(;W+D(7#TLgMNc`PvqpY+ z$1VF=f7u;tk+5G{OZ!K~*-kQ)A7Ze;9vW)hWx=kST?*+ap0p4qKt@a>2>D z=h?E&nW3@noF$*6kZ)^WRwrlNj$7(EFNdKM!xjLjhUM(FN-PCiiR`C?sfza$^%g(- z)2&32LfW;JaTVwgoD#S*gHoaK{za3Yc5P#R5us@4hif{~$YgCmTlfhz95`p7+K#0^ ze?yQ-lE4Ce*`5DaW*9bClY?pY{~++SR`>9tr>2|5iC5w;x6G8Jdzy z%O$6Lqi3+(ppF4|FMBhgPvS|Mxb74Ke*ii?Vxd`*)LBLcBKHzi=eBcdC6@`)H1lbv zC1aY&aFt=Hq|)9m7a`W3Yu%WbjoS95)Bw-i{ZwJ-O6PJYTTxd9b~O$ap%>G6U@IOd zCPtD(rIs=bSW%IMK?5@G#cuFAIqG1lb@cNSiR2hcO+%-=J(7S6T_6eWQIEk-f1aU% z5-)6qPval_bU__R(vzi$QQ;ZGCdFbE`8^@!o21yoMidwSV z5)j)R5ZU3ua#k(f9=M^5l`{f`Ao&n&xI;pSnaO13a_R2aprb1+j3wE)=VB^JFA!nAUvn;2HS_ZF86@SpdB@u-78<>{gRnByy4qs|V zz0Vdj?JD9M=1RS#Ev+Q%jcYkIt*}o9I}Gs6XsqHkoz}ZvXBl2>reYOx@GVVk#8S?4c@_%&-?NWsvLH#t;-IYzI8W+Rq z`OCi4CJhqmI_os3eW>FJEu3gJ^W{o5qtm4WzQly3mM_M-ML`f27DF!Kn2=btj=?cDqg9 zr%%Jyp27enflX7TTcnJejHps}g8|kht?J7fGdrx`oRwP0QLRZsW-U$YS6H9A5LG`v z&5$~Y`rMN%?Tekb$M<&N9zUMr9*69>*Z;ToK05CeA{_CH8_}<6zIng`n@?`LD zAXL)*iOX((fBiFOKW$y@lV`}v_dog|!dCiEe*=8|A(id^L1q)%BR>I^WOF^SMxJ@Q zC7MpdI7I!xerYYjqRl~?3#09W*ASUw5Cmf(ae;y5bWsT7iS<2AnZ=}g3twGp#9nC= zUSk$Z*!gSc@y2?4pu-HIUYFp(+>wxspFB6)EzQEuf0A6yD&Ft@EAIa9B-%lNwi3pn zM7y6&G&7kVptK}+*$|LxTF6+&0ZrJr+C0;SCz~Fm)!Yq8(E-I$8iCYwllFc1=t!w; z5(zG~`)>miAa|**uC92$eXqEE&;P6)hFNNwXcKz`NOAtk6adPFwL1E!M8ZgQVsd?* zqDQ+%f8vMpSI5}^9vjX&JIlHO18K9$j0n}8QwjRPla)*R%NzL!L$eJEHyf`#hCXUC z*zef#?j@qHx}8X@NgwHc?_cZQ|DDj6xh)Yl22yT+gGYyeg#|tLdvXg}3sW;ofB>}# z*KarBw#to|`sO}|i5FnDuo!ohdn%>%Q^Ow=f9;FXCfxcm?~HF4;vEf!Q}H!*%ai)S{!-~hED zk&2jxQOin^!Hv;@WI$B>;y}@p(0MMUHWWy*`-KafBvsH^N~M*3to&y2e~p1+z!`I#H3d0C`K#~3-?Qeq3e?1PT*ag! z2xIff-{eAkNq)!76PLL~nZ7NcJR+xrg0BmnMoV^42DNj`GsbqvZ<1IXqs_VfZG*{Z zKWV1MV{NQ`5=mwe(y)wps90gt&EA9P=TmyOaG5aJr8d=&vKJYIJrC+-)G zy3M}u-y;k@N^MYf77_9(6O~l&pFLuS6+NgoP2BsSmQ6O(&|Fnr;N%czf69SRp3n$p zCR3ost=LWQk^G$pfE~=S9gK_et!XN5*x~=8IjNdGPlDX>vta6Do_uJc6b=x~NbY;W z>)EasU?(kO%u;%|1wZI=CvUvk5KaV_RbkjU6|TKg(5uGdE^MtDGR;9td3!`!vBB_N zQPMV{+npk2r^LS45*T)=e|keY8QbGFXw12$s#lP_L7O>ElPz4TgFGY3Ad&a2s@leq z@DVa%7E2TAuR01gWC{~yfV>PpPa4q%jwhj3VGxKyhwM30;t|C5UW$xi`JO8VZz6)r zL@v_cyX9u_>70vosZ{{c@xX+Q{2b|G77J&#)!Jn5d&W=KBKz<~WTbka+i$&&x?Hix3UTE+xAKpr00W~+73=Kym zsA#!4K}PY4HALj~e-8yzulY{B{TD7aMh)|pAKI_(gP6ApVsdeL%=xD7RS)@A$lsS1 z+_UU9nOTupf>J0{SdG@P^_?^seHawwGqjf3DZwm0Rxpx8s)EZ+j_X zmNTN?Ltn|h)=qil0xz(!N}=8oja1;yB1Snop^Qk176Y2@1Fr5L618=L-sXY9>DgOx z4(<`B9KyJ7`isi= z%fdo*rETj(f7DoJsSdg#@ft{b$HpGqq=mJNMEX3llIge*cqwSHnEa zRCR!iN^eG?w+wxA6U~;U-$eOPslY`MKv}6MEn-t)R(w3o)*Icgm&$kO2mRo-l5vZ(v78pl(j6G}YoJAnV%$RT$hB5K_IwbQ zTJ*Dkl%=E>K^;o_*IpN}6jDht*6)XmBax^5-9)(hwcg?O`T(+w**uo}uRB@n+(JLk zDqooqf8i-hoz~UD)T@V=^z2?1luPYeshYr3>vZ>Wk$Fm0eo-o+w4~NTrFw(}wmN?) z@FzoE1g&wfWp(RJsjEH_tSaq0-$%7!XNUXj{6Az)uZdKI{3vk@hKl20|HLLj=9~ij z^N_jUQ;srHF8T(T`i=Jde$5%k_oH}|e_JdYpQm_WiSINhCb95!mv7YtYeSp2 z(f|*EhAQ`^x@DcoPj=S;Y&LrAdD@Aa^S;)lh(3|NgSDlZfyN)EUPpkc{?|SHvaA z@>5s3TwVT2x6UD9{G28ZQ;d4D#fW7?yK+dj^F1x@mXezf{2EU%Ja0~ffkE3ml%iZ8 zTWJENxC)F*$<}cT0GVXFu-j81e$EDwewF=}E#n+> z2v*l1pJlJKMc_Fjse^mb2*%|j53dls`{8UQa{IW3*M6&Y1DTvUC$x=PDS@QG@696QW zj+A5Em3{sD?~<$pj7qB=7b=}9f2Aa0cQb9)2^KtkJcDOc<~Y2kZNG85xCSgMO;nTg zMz_Tf07%pB@LjxNFBPHsI9ZcuIw~db2S2DozuNfH)nuK2SN=8@m4sbWbeC;ToD4M06>W-Dq^Lp$}e)#V3f652$YpGes zoR};z`obzA46UDk`FG!bXD&uP@|WLzEl-FOQ6%Zqz^R|KtNQEAAngY3pz+DZqT+4d z!FzMxyK!zr_TG*TK2>Ug$uC4W5X~j5=wF8q(TpY@bx0&bd75=A&7K$+f&@wh zfUeF_lQLO)jl}8xeSWz`f8?0PSKZYHiP1$C=P!GioEGp$#3NyZ1Xe8zf?X31Ng<=H ze7VWL%ZUEGK-$uaPwt-I<#?C)ZP*G%`QC!Op^7qf-JN0N<7 z9(YeMLk<~*7%Wu^OBGJC+CE7e3{DY}c{ zW#~`b#hW9m^$IFci^Qmyv}H9&b~Tn~-qs1> zbRDZUabY0Ik(IHXlqI>f%m|VX)mpx(i0D=MCLW$=(B0eQ{9J54*}@=YC7&KOc{by5 zUFCN(5QXfmm7SASS`y!71l_-bcV`j_sj6hDGYBK~e<5W>qI)zwxQP&^Ok1A1-1|=` z?|9+Q3%7Q$Uk25O3wt==eWNZBoH zR2Yp*4Z7ug{|ra3<;vc7_|&wjMUd4iND-c{Q{@S%V`v1;Rb3%`-I~Zu7eohA0vY_n zembkNf7Gbav!FqCAUKdjSBJE@7i_D8uHwZGU^uOsKQ4x>`Qu%TU84zG8^gVmF|6cS zJQy#LQ;V$*h? zcXP7I<52y>y@NNY4xlcD=_I1LNOQB-H2gEsozA=V1!;zo7MoPpM8w}!kVPnC`*EWT zf3KygTLi6S_Z~o^_fNk0{{a91|NrcLO^+nUb?skCXz@S-)niiPheSaXh#_Us7>j(O zgtsKJv!beVn3Y+RALSmewDtOJZ9wowY#FdO+!)@m@cxK?$%}LDy%CYs-7`Z?b#(Wr z7ZRtdva0eU;(nfc&W&C0lZ@%Lcf&p(e@i)BvpiB#^}eB$qCvob^JyjkX(BE{AtSOw z^F%Nek%~+v<+9ug(@DZDr4!D6JHSnXU!-OWnOtoAJ^g9{V?8SNe^9v~cIzm=D0(70 z(2~rC7jP1R=m&~0+-P~8R92o+(rY)OnNc>-!VDiVe_{4NWNiN{C3zK<$3UTOSsGFn!7c z9`J<`TxQ~?U4-VxoS%7-64ol1S6&OM*_WEL)*?3a;U%)|N5$t&0V&$7TP}p%McIyL zeJpFf0wG`)`IESq1F7f}%sRtw6eHS98e>l7pt`qUiD6q*s zV+zY-lp}5le^Lq08>C4%xqM`<4oxW+$(jch=Rt$1)~Fl;ag@(ub~T6eln!l)zQ+!` zcN%9IGJh?;GU$sR$(Ns|74#7ViLbyPpxl!Nh2F;j}wiEUt&Xk6f4Xy}T=y5=PAnMWFxaKjX8&yv`BN5PEd$LcvpypI7SFUShKgEn z{pFeWta{?~X}S_xmo4>?kUH~5vMGlF^P7fE}`-|Nl%srj#kDLnX+AU-!}pbmO_ zN%X@*tlJJ9Dj~A# zY|q_i#?+;5nD>;+dc8R;?1=m&ordv`;NgsC-7=W+s(}l-^=x+8RTK8F>ltUVlg44Q zz}wc$5;=+rlwr3&6oYP}mt=(+AMAEmE3tH=^_}DupS%JE3ayA)CCHn^U9BXhzbw9h z1+zas4KY!hyj`!b{W2sN@Z*jCV z6XxPk@sFnBl4l`hSwKMsc!@Cs8VX6Q5xe>S`t+3lz4l}-Ju8dB{1VWxn<%4Y)IOdt zfCD3`c7GmV_Ks)@{)J&Uv0>#nI;`^$O}Y?GZ{`8wL7H@9zT&W3uwbh|pk<39Z_D2M zt;VhHN{X(D?0;>yV1Mm=fZVQsBHw-`#QVqLy$JFCvHouSz#M=5PJ+IE=Y@{!wCldv zl>Ikf;b8xvdijeV{p3A-ye&6=HGTc{Z{14I^6Rg^{#{qS`|f)mzW>v&-+kx(_da;{ zr$77Ihk9r9i$3F-=-2$+jXc|{Ui)kI$GeZ-d-M~wJb!L!H9m%Qu=rd&v`ewm1aR;FvsK0;cfP-j#T#b{5hl8)9Wiuvcb^Dc2MMW^L-UAiw2eWWJ?8w7(-sEf8X zAwN}`3x92%g}ql6LrtZza=UG;*t2vdapFDrq${ihRD0@&7o?r(&E)AYmRPr}EXB5g z`u|w(2^|eMQGZt3zLV-#Gu0<5%(8T7fN1+=RFE<|FvKLdBKAjg$8>C{a=mMJz(GJB zm+3=SZGgGJ)Fqdmj!j5AmNf85aw_#R|BKVkNq>w36|%DTPN8fhY!UKd7jAyv*8n%3 zY@4!WgYBAtCFHslrTKh(TT>x2>ipOy&lB3D2%>y3j67kAGp2P;?hD=^0i|bS1KPYo zw0|>L(-cik@Kdw@4vL-W3eVIAxgPYIp15D|-TuE1hyPHQWt0y{*=mIa?f*iB$ToLl zAAjV?!BU405}!6$4PCNXStHudpAt*L9UH#Q1@A}hew}m>v@(`fxkKG*+f0L=-jXIm z{;lxhbI)SDz7Xk^^AP4MY@MimgUj7`_@CZ>oR^8kKAWKp+ffAG@ZP8$C4I#Q9H27D z^K>4U{hPYoikD~|56=UE&b-p3Yc}gfO$($ExFIVWtum;T%3s12b3%~bk*gUZ(SNw? zq`yh2sfFSIoOHD7b~3n463eG3pycME6~kbG8-NXEzgtJyu%y6i+`0ZG)4u*%;RdF2 zz6RN)o~Z>oJ&4%#U{wnrE(yO|>XAasm{SV)1-Iwsj9~D88x^Wu# zk6Jg9;WpEouQ1}As#)G2=ldjq_kW0GLT?7D5v8)Zzp>UpHB7N6{4THjy1^FO2y2XV zssz!H9Ef`ocptDI@xuPXhiURpzjWH=VBWY9 zjtthoIEC>44ZO_3fpBY75BI;yZ8!W}(*EjA91JE5s_T(pm4f|6J~HIwpw8_KmL~ts ziS|&T$yD6XDBRMuL>DC#UVlPUlR2aeNQ7>ti;+FY;beuzVsOU$$>!0sNynYANm$H_ z15%-#RG^Z4>L?eyv#Z#aaQirdxuIo=%I}%j;CzD%2As5RhkyMA`rJeuzU*3$ zyLwN(ttuy(^pNgVue3thhRce#{*OC#{o4z)wz6G#U@F3u0$s4&)UC+N=9#W6-g?}3 z|6KFJop$A*@Z&bJA2Kh5cG>`Bpo>7sP0L1mCb7Gj$*ZD-XrVU@yiTzQD#TgYLh55s z&SAk-viqst)$#@hqkqVs3N^xh$u1SXMrN#<)D0&=l71`j87qN>7>sJ>tQQ3fc#!Qu zd3dKIS><+|z^>B}HB6q${eQE;+R4aK+A6O6D(v^)j!r?g)x0uTaT;rckMjo6f0s0n zrO&fu#a_zjN$WS6Va~XGHf382p%u;@C(Mh``Bi^Q!M`r$w13!uqlDej=|r!cR-LPy z3l&<&n>T3BAOeO4cJDh*CAx_q9XEMTJe?A{6j^^U3Ra(5bQc4p`#rOG^|t)H!GcZM z8UlUUdU8E&m}JemZ^q{V&+)Qq#XWH0h{RmuA99mURxV?Uijgz>I|jfaJcAioAbLq! zBJud%`5o>0v48mJwU*7R(>cGZ*Y-f?Jb%PrTKbqx5r@QggV~`O$Tg`_h))W8DRwOr zhviS*8@nlCAzZwS&*})f?#xx+_@$mp0cu|VtwmWxcKwXDIY9-RH<k1b)c2f_EO@HryHl<$#t^3O#{w+_w(n^7& zY;7bJre2`hV-nr;%1SpRrH|JfJbo~4ue(=2Z&!UO>)EG$8D(JWhA>2;5;dO?VS^ZN z$#y&4|NB@cXsn?${da!ZWcZZRassy>#^Q-C#kYVX5);$(h^Z6 zTYs#*tGWryEhygAJL$W^VvPHL_bH&7<4aKCCK(;L1PP{wLJ7iv1eVzx;HYE!PJd(U z)QZa#Js}xZpx)3A%)tu^)b_V=tHXo(QZi0B+)`%hFEog&`2YG_iru^@Sg$UInw4#> zOYbj0HdC}yBXmx$iEMt@rLVh7pK!*7^?!Rp&q>eLqot88L9FUU+Qb;8#yr{hjXwnG z;?uHUgWM-g8}a(^-0#wJfASdP)z+oHweD+4Aw@#3cPhg1d1E6xB$7ke5O&R`-2dkY zWd!N0*g5D_YC>3@{!*nsCMH36Z+v9IG+KG(_^Ei`j$RqRG}OURsDFW+ z7uwpFBogl;P{F1KN$&-Pg@8a9>c#;eHw`kFN}qB?!y!)JNp1hy+noMtV-h}>)pNYz zbT(`5g>GbY~tfX0wTDL3hdOqyX0xHfKD|{kX7an$;~_hHPXJ@ z`dHTK9Kwt}?&wJ_X|c%DFT7!sitsgVp~T}s$&)laD>!>*3<469!GB4pAR8LPd0G+a z=8CXr*Y5u`Nz5aI4!{Vno3ns z8XKu!%aQyCW(GtrdLIIyx8%>ghtrAl za*U7%r-}okeun0^@7At2)K;(hZ((4cy};VoBKW)c%qY+ez2$-^-LuJ7bX?JRs?gPq<=ho1A;V@OxpdL zWu@$m%#;q}BySNb;b>I$CyYoYTt8WZ=#7vhMF?!3lu1hbEAR7COcvr6HDL=Kw@3@? z(&(Y%PD-Ttig2jJjzZgRT#QGL8fQTlc=6a?a$1nL==ld4*~}#0|MU^UfpDSy$*+Ek zBV9R+pMMN>`HLU@^V!Mc-{7TF?}UEwqqF+t^WUVmB3k|{*}>n(M_Rll)=)=Nd5G=G;KW4+mwtq8*ii>U(SIfkALl2|)z z5K;DeygZ3|JwV7^fd>lQ_QQ)Q!WUT|N=_A@z?c4PDkTh{`$x2dt`nXI{bW+2&nZ#K z9&4x(Bzy#MICD@c@6bg=sA z*l5%1oa9@I@IT7dJ93q+ihg#N)!v@XdpVe~J- z`si$VNJhA|hH_fXa+Q3=DLW6{EC4JmReu4A`bG)c`=$Cjb-%bSj}Kvr6E_Fx?G--# z{?tScc~;(3U&2Oo>o-N+nyW60rX%?~FmQE{%~Y;cmEq+I6Dw{GMs^q98%PyEO$>f? zs+*+~ect#9(JWTU)m1%k63vw5E5%h(rB!OLK+_QReldpnBLsRQ2@C2hl0M67B!2@C zYbpecbd&g#Pk>2li{C=h17l$L$vKaRJ_4*-`DW$$5QT-bfEw6kC1BarrC_v@iIv#R z9JE2~UWsym65+)@?PPpIkzN!omAQx1GNCbYh81eKqU#DvY@BfG>)Og@uh?8t z*dGk6Um5PIbl{BI?7f6^nLLZtQ-82rsxWptE5eB*&gf{V#*6_^c1xtlAqvq*s8Zx^ zc)EgGr(bgHeRoUOlvd+L17~!cS-lz(aDR;PrvXvtZ_fERua_FOBtpT4U|%k$EtKR4 zT^n>|re>_S*qa|Eos5{G=$4HmQtT2D<0<;!lJce-J{k+ zb=!^Fi8+|nmxyqQxF;$tC=S)%%PEQ*n{+i&@~ebxs^;ZNkt)l79)9S589VR}%9(ZaLq(Iv;fioZDg|c}yagwy<|F`y)7W zyzt4FpX>B~Lg3|3y+UwNpUM_clDP){A=`0 zfBD0|p(*BnTv!-oWTX~klmu!;)lcZuIe~--=<3EqtL{@nmJV$e(SLcvl$tox;T;5( zvE5F!6Tm5^4YI8bks$14fmpIB4cJvi=GGRuYClxw|QBRO!xtS-l@BW1W1hwxYP z^I@zzPo(-;#FT_n$mb?&6vQ@l3wyalwPPCfp9dAvj13O!&`JDEI1W@^!p<;59;_sT%E*{%2beToagj zsr)M6juaTP-}Aw7y|&MwGDEl|$Xa>SXH?nl5d&o9`hWMg-NzUs&>^}uhzXZt$@w6<8Yl=YGd>_X}xX@or#UzO!oi@<5feI{u0e05GG z4lS@A+J8*t&dU`}rbeL-D9M)J=ch`?h`E&8VD-BC^!FD&bl8TOf_d$7mL#H5ySPPt zE}wjYFNL{5=QtecB4b5_-Rs+8%pr#LyT2qU^RH_S(V&M zYefIDDdpFkJ$^8_Ve0E8C>UqhluXvPYJWgVpk!L}YEtL_v(}!KC<3!$Hlj#| zS!eO|vy+ypu;8}_9~B>v6Q%eRd|kavuz^xJ%v#qD<*l?HmwkBThEstT#D@ClP;~Q2 z${VL)=l!&kMJh}BX1JT!9PTI@FXVKNQGOVZJSgFZbQT;Rb26C1Ci(HXxcdkSI585P z*M9_1J(%m)-8H`vpyw`^g)W!f*1!x0n1C4xI2+s1E-zi6_ZJEGfN%W#t1l#+lwPDn zlBSe~(d%iLvH$1Wujqm#T?AZ~7O8QbvF;<0qcuWws5Z;v@Ecyok{aO0W@-`wcAHbi z#Gq|PA8S=0=~<&3_N}T&50|6?Sk-C;0e@V-{%rY!0eD>l@GH@L#UsmP0&-P|vRsZk zcYTGTFX1@OG;{+6>uK4tGR9JL!+A*2Cy+X-$aBj_1eaU4JK(f9rO$X&5UZF3o^#4( zGh|>jSZi-}Qx9=~KIz@2sI668QHvm|H4~R-hkb?d`%IYu8;3tZu)- zT+cU|@}4xw1Pc<<0JP179#nvd0tM`$U~u?gf~t~25Qea+EYq%T#nvT28q7(}W}(EI z`4b0JL1m^RbUB>AQg~aTR~Euw{(tbV2zL>q=F(^)u_MNZl)qT|Vhs15Uon6lTA2X- z3qSe&0ZTkiMk=~3T#q8+n@PATCXz^ITuB_xsMxX90XXkDwG?_o$eI^QYV`Z>nmCR3 z{eKiCDyb-)Zm3Qwv#8(y&%)kEo`xw732VUI$!_!@$M{44qX0g?Z{?UW;D5{G`%y#K zczU}1|BU#CpmR!GAVwx+HmNY}qX8n&-NXY>Hwwp?@W&A*UQdi>)(~zOC11#NOV8qW$w&fXAe@zoI)$>d0pQ zEjL(OV<`;NY9%r|^0zJxsq_Iwf`YfaDRWwe9j$Ge{{UC09i5phV@`)I1$`r7Fsx9y z>2~$;ImB4=x2@Loy|Dy{ur+(WwD!@mHJhnx)RiQI4B=Xgh zLyyXFz*cm^upL?6sOIpcOjRbZ<1C3lP~C(k@PFG#5H_yQ%70|-fE+leuPn^<$s4oY z8^?1=jMNM3j^HTfXb7x%zx-CU&Af@E(&5l9Xu2mIS>0@$^5zG$b9XXJVif*kZ|4gO z%k4NDs#YE!RPkpL9C^5Hf5V@ijT2}MMihG_W+A_HVB*YnuSCWPkNK8dw%?ULkDWHR z?WOAhSo@=A`hS&AMJ6!rE1?Ha7hvNFlX$4qPy-esJ>Eg>zr9D5xhLdfdFrNxSoOth zen#D8jZSj^rgGAlk#kv1oVu-<@$lx7uqyjOMRr7YG5_v4}rIW{_ zhrAeGQ6jv+g+HUgtL72}gPRnqXN+QXW3rQ3WqwTc(trOvx2@t;;pGtc0#D(uKUdAy z-vSoIHH}Ef!E)`fyyOiFDQ;tAJYUQRodvh@3;49Dh2&34Vt&{8^ykk~f82CYcOWvl z<=JcDlCmU)~FG6O%S~qIrbhjrBOG*k*#>4bAsEN=(eS@kSk0Dyx~Bf>_vYiI;8% zw>ecjM7}10=oAbz;#deuuNCPFeMqKDEz3O-5r0ZZB#tTsFsDJzN?a#wwcQCNRHa7_ zN3Z?6Jh4pf3r>`b5~AWr_M0h!%S%xx6M9j}mUD)R!vybf*>G@fu$MvyNgAQqR0t)Y z!q#9R(jJ%6ZH3{Cgp5Gq?kHcSP2PD+SLR4m(k1kBXC1Q0RPAzSQ~FGTlT!$pGFbP* zb$=Sk(=*jz^Ig6*FQJ-yFg)2zwXys$s}$zO4kub{y5|lIZ0T!gUHE4=e^KF5dD79( zT9dD9gam`JhZLKoz9=HhR8~iv37I>~Mm9>fhWx_n1395U$;=bAG2J;%<3>UT+w4vG zj74|9r>n!cE35S{C-PYE?kM>#Bzv)g&wp6juiS#e7UdGvZfj~#R(wWra({}61dY|& zFRV8k(3+GwEL?&1R{I|4`Fq!$bH6sXS0Dd@k?bvSBy~!&J+Fr3ah`s?V?pfv>cDpK zyJO&tl~P}iHAOvqjMs~#o{Wigr}%dalv1z3uLu@hwGwx`}&*GzeqRPGzmm)kA9fogD2pG<3ab4=(hiOc7|CEc{s zUbW8TNRqZ~yi?RM(K3B(U&3Yxty2BG$ZfRq-+wOjJO^CR)w)eV)r4-hW?s%T7#` z_lHkirP@d{ChR;If*BKa?wZQX!L@`4_t+3M=asZIqf@(zKTTc+%SxHAP|pfEQ}wJE zlo@E5W4?;Z?Y8V-$xLSnDXx}(xd0Mg6g$)0@);xM|1xpUkQJ)0gS-F{D31!8Z%Hz{ zY%{CABxO4 z-r5^5Tin(wpy8$4oJ!oJtkK!lUgWSowxZ>ACGU71?qi<%rtz_AIKku(;kvNw7^wj~g;ET7aZlg&v>F%m}+kg_Az4iIryF^!u)b0dGt%7J7MFc7L zz!kwzw%`AGEKKMTWye(f5Jq9$meSFEI~SGI!*a9*@+&b2{%No|US6R{nZ+|>IV#VZ zw~F;SE&8@>O*b<*z^7CHJlQ$^w(c*snCc*fJfnSDHf||$P=72%l!VPppBp_avh0iO zw}8DgLjaPj1Zw$wbJ{gGATakaq;{J@1mytw0V(OALc#U6M3B2s2ice^0d|1YB80>2 z%pXnm(n*gzp`nt4VYUF=yc}H#p)lroN#3IjM8f-uam$^UVv9l_)?)6p_*D>@@OGmn zDUDE>MJ>`i27j-2J5`U_dbfBeBW!Toz{3`njE|?gsZ!^;a&CEAR^JpXdXNF+HSJr@ z)co;5;yI%+zO@7l8yccdri2N?uOZN_h}!9No@J3hkcO7)4|wKPEj8*gpoXQi1nfO-{Wq-||A^R8)-*8I7w?aaF!ZDU6Mf}1?xGBw zw&;^L{(t&_jg^9~zmHqu-E5rJ)M6X4r#;90%HCFhu%&6qHDisx3T&XZ%S>=j2{yF^ ziz8G3ue@9oI#8qqe0>s4`aFgIN*4FY{*Nal&B<4@2BKT(Kp09AChrpISaCbnJx|LB19)@==bx7Rdu_oine6wtzbV0lG6~Q!QSzIjUTP?r$i_BEvVwBWOwSS1jQN55bie>Liq)Wu$I;mthHo8)#3}ek_ z+2vtr-Okc7iefk*ux5)!OP2M83TbV_kkZrjYou;vhRs_gA3x6u`&K};X~0Ecs1;eG zYO}xuK6c7g*pEW?oMH(d*4izZv2EE$8$#~J7X0ZM!C5G9#$3?Sp+OhR%K_(CDBQC9{8k9AhfGpsjn<0Tsm3ZnHNiA*^Vin-1# zyDnkCHyhs9WL{~7eAF21wEjgcK!2$cH%Tpw)%QzB=c_rTrXO>TO+AVyT|XE%b-p_%QV80KKihw|tw&_x80VK_wKtUT^ponz z#pH^dY&%C`?JCpWhDpDT+w|q9f6swqzejdH|3}3Dw`12q6voHWJC>|TVSf>I<(Ru2 z&JeJbar~Y-m{CAB2s6Y^f?xGz;9@z#&)va+FDuJy>|#6pKDqDMV~DUwsh7fjf`xYE zh+0_m)`r-bxyx79^)c5dgleGb1gVY|*f|m2 z#~!Qsc%g7p_TH3cQVbeSWq;?Aa&xxbk;g`|hLnAMT%)idIG#*o!*^zg`%&>JQYf9h zM=ho&p2s+?GR@`x(6HHlc7NkGr+Rh@eve-eqi!7iX$`0j8JzLwm!V;Zzdk$1zfSNuar9kn z1qm?Lgstqq20vQ2rZ9>f<4>Dk@}x{Eli2kqDjR15>>Pq2J>0ftt@D?6(2iXnbHeaGKecr(TT{71ZqHs|53S$B!De&k)Cv)$zL+NWEAu zu&(NWlPqxu*MA##AihPRD-*geAxMUso)HS@od{2%QRySb1S{(%kQm5C3}EFBD9tko znassU8Yg-t^mz>DBO*fhGvYK4{1|z9L&JsrKfn9D5%AwZJx4qVN}tyw(NoW~z1#y8 zt1!b`aSqBl+%!r=xJ>BPGR183$mEd^@|2N`Ej?IdTKH16HZg0`*7zHwb+u|&@%Due zNwCd zoSGp`yo! zSpbntq^M>xbOn3a{5t+L``*Lp9ft5zKc1*Sb8Nw#t1-ArCb<6LJf(M2o6;bETWQ|@T4wvm2 zzFb83xNBHD+LiW-&qsYmSIfyId;$x@OMgYCG&KnF$DBJ@=VBmZSgsXP;v?i|WG*?B zqe;MP8X^mcVh|CF>KUln1ST+~!cA$l>o`o`L~gD`q7duN|2g$*qqNbOuz)D36tzp} z(ewH=+>c-w@8<2g5A+e`MO31%q#hy4$yZ}F@%zXMf zc#h?G7Q|Kxyj>_&KvL^QiYt29`Ed54du;<=ZYEA}qs8n2+=0)g600i9)qiGNSlVAk zhp-KLa+iPtqE2L6#5?4>=z2a@VRXT()=tNlSF5^5{V%jjvvxjSZrJbPqG_$N!;q(V zT1pkiVX~2ic6l(G=yQY-1UGrOThv$d4px%`lUYZ*hUqC>MA$?j_)ff22!oH0+C~r# z8WSqt$v97d04Z~^Rsa~Adw&lx)?0~wEim`zd$zwoh%Z8{18GNmY%N=;5k@&wG)F6n z9OtUi$BY(+{yu_JQO#AZWEx5%qhSGFxo9Zs}m zk-sLtY_17&mSFrsJyCF}R0e?kQuY+2Q{{A?i+=NAPiEeekr6+XD1WjnJPZ%s@B~VF znKRZGDWE7VTAs_zYEuRuLe-=8#ksASqfTU2EbBa1Ov|DrzpIFxHf8Jc#@7cUJlK{y zYg@=MF5>`N^w~jCd7TeaomYokavUvR2r@wv!FHl(yr5L&e zix|zKx0E{>Hq2NUWtTed)%)Oc>k_S}jm{1@o}4C*oMRxKD`GC8Nq3o~?uQ!noEGtM z&K_EsunQ^JOn-O=0`o~011aLv$}A`}NSGfI@EloL(oTXorSLLH} zwR6zXY8@HV%2mx40m6V%ID zrLZ5|;}rHLm&-pKK;iRvyCxaa34e^2ye(IsWFUWkg;X-+!<%b}h{RzNKA2d47L^afO9<^7ZM2 zGPiOKD$jcYxET%*H**=EK@RmKMseYJ`H%4UubR8?J%8LnKD;?Y!R-PyQGZNkZ5RxXjp0Chp$vFWh22L4-= z%zwOvLvmzvpsk>Dgi7tIwmgu=(u3TFNxD=%TkX6|n>`|FW4=P9N#!n##qv#-dlq@_^`O06WgAhLFk+&vXoQ%J10hSPw?`wvBEw_o*qn)@j}O z7J?+l7EgYe{mr)2MLmyWvqjk`48n$sH-FID?v|_=N;@=`K6K(P(s0ki#60F9khE)g z!nK%B7-)K%lD!9?h;Ee9V=l+8;nD8=(UThC`~v&?{u&^+oSULw#Fp( z#-2w)>|hd3VZek0CW=sqv&(W=cZ&O0YExUgkNOqszMHlRiy?XJx@Px3-jfGgb$`3I z>amTU!%!uI>~C;@XsI7Vr|Ddb(-*(_d-+F#SPgstaUUQ~6RA+$@jGO>n@sUb3@UYC z8Kc$7?uz*w%ih`UXjVnA0|00PtUba-4rcQ80H?f zXJFx;lg-EKBPsD|ue}#w6qz+)cYnYU`3q1AJB+PgRA(J}<4PO3nnuCb`~NGXEk&}? z2NQd{CiWlUWP3q%`NtM&+u7F6-6+gv4MJh#C2XP2K%N_rxqt_zt*WoLLCdUewO~8& zwgYtd241-HvGOuXxRG)K5^uwhPxlTPj>}8gf%*4uqc{jDOe>CON|ir0#(%PeB5%dY ze+>CG%Z-HQ=-#=0rNw1NCY!_>l5zx~r@$D7=LxCfMlbYjoiP`>Cm{?O1Qm6&;ty9} z_N+mAqtE^Y>>;5ynrrc0H{REGXv!Biv?*qw8Ap;MS+25 zoGAt*u!N0C<;jfr!3<>{TYtAvwYYqDg$y!Ug9#vcqgobNyh@Ug&3a)kDjnUytE!JQ zfAQ(GR_ZgnoJmmjfhy)k43VZr5Mhb)TFi;=zQkb;J6%HSEzl4XMdi*bAe?rx2NLwn zahJ<$b|P-Z7bu^+@ROliSGmlhyl>*x{MbC0(l;3a<&hT@$Tt7HNq=~u&@n~*ZO(SD z5o4o#nuT@}vLVJk{F^R?ygcx_O~ZVNLAb1tS>?%^-1+x^{D_RWC*BZHG))DwIom_& zOQNrSS$sB(Clw*FKCi7&nUv#{T+iR0U%s8IwD+){@9uh@*FUb%BFVY3o4JaoaUmDo zOtF;0f+9V;E&HwkgMT;1x*k^aomtV-Z7pX>*KRpvcI1z~tviraG|x6}nQ$`&iCrHY zcS6-_T3ioX^v-P2TMeREoefABh)1uohEVAo5W^|1S0RKq?dU~7TlzR_AuRbj%0oY_ z;oNJO%k}mqn*?c@Jsf&ol%jo(x~D|27X;1UNQAKgDfnk z{ut{yXVKkMcB(ny`XE?ne{d@@GsHFnt{Xru0OgQK<;Jy}X4U9>Gme)dFd6_eT5|CY z6m5{X)a)bAOLT$DoWtHGwC;-WY=5!;cQ~3v3_WZ2HDik^@~+F(Lc*heNm2VgUZ)CI z$VDyz`t{x--+%00w(IoU^;|BJ@Ud)?=(Odq`JjbYVDwAm=G$%>OrnKjdWsEyh6!z8 z3^Mj46@b8DNlKp)(zL08X{T0M&YJ#5S$nYtgjC%yDW3-R5r*BU{g>=rQ`P0K(7DXg z_>q3Uboo!3{U3AdmcNmGpV&OqJ&7_x*DH)C(|%BXQ-5Pfsv5%I#Lf*&el~S= zBF~3q-+y-gItt-H>Z!Vy$n?F*<_3{5iu&69l{(DUwMf|1EV8h z1u4V8dABy=&a8}b-hsJ^mV2PCO1+}awlYkRI&EWPgO_y?|cBUmf z6lG7bI^@6A)DNUCN(z29dBU@k=->@T_;R7+rsgd@`0FF`$uDmuyj>y9%5urtgvfcl z{?|8hy_?b}nN1E8}rBEz1YV5v7T%Ez`V!!PSRm~ z=Y^K|wCldvl>Ikf;b8xvdijeV{p6?kcw27#{r~#w-@28a<=0<-{kyJu_ucnC{NRJH z-+kx(_da;{r$77Ihk7^li$3F-=-2$+%|4-bAHDbJL#~U@VMR*iH>>(i8&epeuYcDj zVwtex4#h{s^0~i6`C}=F)TXSWRo?EuYXS#ol5^Y}fB01`iG5p?fl3q6|I^7^Vx$LE zEu;`E5Sk^HyQZdWP{}YG$$>-d>UeLi)x3XMOYn#(#G*(7=0%ZOx;&CbbyD3{q(tocTr0zBF3p%Bw#;reXI~WF&oNPvpQg{X zQg$Aa?X#eWo$CivQYT46-B-F}l(s=g30yzw-v{106BF?#m@kq|US|ynlZ4zU)tGFu z_!O-Icc?C$swf;k8eDctb;HRwC5o{svi`}61kWWhN23funjDx|U?K)5oPRZK0`{pUZ7CnSe!<+k0e7XZiTiR{DbeHETBHqq&$1DSt}0V-pf7h3pN`>|K)(D~K7c|M*&3Q%ZBy}>9a3QWr?#^dh~Ymj#%-j&8N zx;fnjX3Wrdc>>NnrGG&g+z3lUB0=D4#TLUwp$ zl;uMgdhDkP{^e2e`x|Dxh^sDZbqSHf$bLLCMR;-$QnN-l*MGe6`N%MZvIxk!ajvtX z9(9{0kmY()Q*T{d3Bkq$Y5*BTxzmHlBrT-K z@>ujPk-9fhSK4H~!eE4iBw0e_GN3!u#hoyE%gsQsUO4xX*w za*NM#(Y4` z0Ci_Kv6c4gVIz{dEPCF`gys`?{{@!Vf8lMqKXvBp?8NCc<+{IDU*pu)FrwJm>U%YS zyV29S`+ra$?2o#d8n*L}9$ILDg}^LSUH0FxM6~LBN&(oacgD&Gun6x3o{OxUT1=laJA697PVQP%nUqe}D zF~m{>4t3aNSBJK3ao z?|+?_H7P!P=M|b1@7XWE+Qa#wO$zJdfT+lW}b688sb}!H_2SZq3$A9n{_0Iogs-??-ZV7vFp*i%>O~VQM1jvRm z5&fn@2#{K(es%2vN};Q28Ii$tpwjPiv$YCMS^j)l4x&o!jSj15gKLQg2ZSvf0av;I)1=?+9r>vbu}%F9Vu1dc#2Ut(s9qcz`sLkc3_j-A zET_C=P;@E%+Y4yqh!7>jz{Co=(00l`sz+2`LifrS(4uhX-J1CP`%}mu?{MY!9MDIC z<3<)^eLq1o`loW!(gxWVT8-9wsee4DR-s6)J!f70b$&Ni5u%S7NzOnjBcou{&2QhCo(_9>ERLSXb<vc_G(Y6-bRaewvgq5e|;kE$fkXo|&i)Mps zc)E??XU6r8RN*U1P1BQA^WA4Yr!Zod{$W9PX-QEBSBBOD{ki|^Pt#c+o?L8*P*an< zWyqDI5)zF7VnCh0l_BY@Z0mn>n*B1x5s$g!8_Z>omu&Um8fTSHWxLgVh@HFfURWny zuJ6Yv<>MPiDWBYCl=AUWM=2rNpJf`Spl;DOm)2TvFP^pD>2vE26(k6ynV9dJ ztf^eoG65wnJ%LfJn=>x+ZkNyfZJGDWc^Lcq`US1KAvw*%Njwrl-QD8hLl%;gF-ta? zsU2(3r2%<;B15yakdtLHCFjthSS?Pw^3IZl+rqjJxS57d#K21>d?(=ioMFVydrv5@ z0d#w$(50ozCf$F5FfNnKQR(71iyzCk{#1VrRUJ6$4Nr>Va4BFvRtgp+ z0NBej4xNkH%A$KXNAR)1+-aI(f(vnHIZt3HMCR%)4$OM4~mz)_vq5Tin7O zhhCwbu2r5%%~a>5+t`nnv1D7etJAtW(zBpzGsU&p#S!2^}!HUl%YTSxR)lN$fa zqIs;$tPy{%Q=(LDBf)~D-|?Zr@nv*(_I2yUJ)wLmhi|rHcMJ76IUcL?Vv7^A-gNFV zPUoU2syZ-q=_+<~g^&Tc%Ozh8GlAB?amza|XNSjqw&|?8qyyH9?jb%oh{QuRHC|G0 zU<1>4pyd>tg3h|EB$MU~zF6Jy@6jUjRQggK@9!+*uU0V{8dhz;qQw@;WDyPJd zD+Sm}jBmp5Y8Y`Yn%)q(QpxNsN8n;^kNkF8uWM5>mL6O&-rRzFaH4(h8%AYm-H~J8 zq`ZHF>Ytl=(z=-F2AyrIviH?@(6*zLpv#S3x>Tmi=4;A#&GvO;6z2Q*{Z^ImKA6g) z)mmp1(a8N}RiJ>xG?#kTnOeAyj6UF1%b?Mm_p5K2mBOn&Z$z@cQ2TlN>P33s{83vv>L`mzIA7A6-%sd@(Nx#^Pkq|J!rQrYd^m_O4v{ z#gBgakqS&l&uFUk=%2tU!u`pr>VNU0wrlNc+AGhBj!(Y$G%7p%tG`#+m!#LhE`yP{ zAAR%d@0N?NfBpB^KjqU*!-2Hm6tHpQI;-nVL`4hWZ{1yIqU+;*2;Dvg=`ml-L&rOVZ2cb3w zq7m*X0ft9V?sI1w`AQ;^fIei8Zkrl2!~f_^D(L-@+ibaCHsuyedaT{ww);9Z1Ws(b zz6?*%4l){E(}^Gad|2&SS9^A4Sy+EDuv23Q$UJ9NEQP9;RAo0sgzBIes$d5!sTCl=+@ZDzpt(>A>QV8@(b;%eyx;w zUXf_}D$ew>#ouj9-(o{ty;A$X>wv!h{j;hV#$OI~;ePFYIo69`KgaGX-M)YQC4{tG zNUBQ|KmYjaH(TTGH9D6G+2i2w$;1E4EsmsT?)Lg0`~#oaBjF|OvBpIR|2F-Tzx$^j zC7=Hfr%#@Li-%6?RsD+}oz_pj`Sw=30OW2h42H#)xZyT{9AZbesFQ8s{l~W2Qvr>+ z(R#Jm^fitN@qp9m1#_S9l+b@okA^nEB5H1`Mx`G)jh-%^SL$&Aw50VTfNkinXsG>`Ah*4e#)yUP{_if6)fGQi)!O%0E8!&iKb>*=7G+~LBm#OD7@^t;$FMxQ%ynD- z2#qm!53>QpoBDv}^p+R_n;xj!R-gvU8*tdYf+wX0Da!GIV$Oyep zZ$#+*}v#*c@uxoYDPkfFJ1>_)JsjuV^N5l z(Cc(pp&;@+= z3e8kM5kY^Dwx;{MJCeF-Wiw>RnswB3ZfB7OO6t_Be z=kJi7wz>4gOek$NPvS%s(M1y6aJ2B2xaY1Glz+293r<#W6qVslO9dZ<5{qQZJ#}M> z^UdOn!j%T_%qm0t2CiV;_+pGaz@mhM0UuDxhXj9~BuHl@soiZAl42fmed#Nflsjs0 z>KD^u)or$-%5q1SCdQK7kBbAvNpo6=%zc;lql~>3(LU2GHyybg&_+R{yyHU&>a%_LiE0O_UwP$lyYB!RL?qvfmV|D-HF&zsm zEf-|%pVgJGXOg}Q0oN>ABE5w{cHJ=%9C;}`i&qR3NBu%8)PiN*W>WWv0uKt!dTTb| zOLIOB7Tof1f&vo74NQR6?yQ5H0Eo=j=K+U3?S~1`QM7^cTre#BL78(hTbzj6a3Oyg zz(kg8UQE1&DJcVcq$@9iiLIEj07P(&J%d=mz($ zpe-(%Zd`(9+go-6@IvBX`ht|4RbPL_5S>(z+?DlJt6>K}fIz-tzu=iG$ZiUHhZkKD zwNUfS8ItmIxsc|Yc{dIw;BU6hH_UP*j z*1c=BdzWazYELcS3JATdv=JsftSr0i*%xokR|#kGm!+v9&xmo4W^ zQpY&9HBr>8fTt-XB1?opsUQn3nha=+#AyELnw8h24so|Q%S!4ix0oyGqsFb`)PU*O z?#WkQ5vAPJ!nfBk1HDzx>@E)J_#)48%jqXACL)j}!!5G(LfA$t#h#vX4#GM|d*pj< z@G8_y6y3^2+pfl}S4$<8E17@Tznli(14=C*{Zx!s>7*FMs>LgkarR_zUz;?$4RZeu z?KgkpBOmV)IBkdWjNgM;i$;ADvHPyPu<_+uORYD9MXeyiw)pG6xg@=D^`Tq*hy;KA zPZ7?XosWP?xkKsVUlB2i^}47}ni^@jM~I*la?di|E0Bllvexq~HW_~zY)L0;OB!+5 zn0#&Xr&QQLCgU9Up*RuoBOHwmteZs)#sv~~6#8-lye%D{+HFEr8MDhZhBmc;x#A+qPCfmC0!mQO7p=4SF*Tm&Io1e-s3ub{nrN!I zygsNM`f~lDYXeIqj*XZ~YI~jYb>46pX3`i`05!FqI#OP1SS@hL`Nt##F0C5W?$88l{E-HlR^$N}^L2qSS zcTH+u3Ac!CAwqu$9!HsWa`wA{zJP(*A3F=o2Uz5csq@d}$N6~D=>PO%oizXAKK1W^ z@uQ#p>-xM} z`CmSF*Z&_2`2gKcUgwj`-hEJP=2gEx>Bh0!Uh{;?KIVTVzx{FgS$>>emcQ@o75=$# z|9{>!@+u#H_UTXLg_DOr`{a{PFM0UWpZ)Y_;f?GCM|p?dztcaER&STto%FVJ{BuhA zul@8d(TBO@;+Ox!Eu5+!bm{vU@cdFl1!UHou8_pawRhJDcL)75<4 z$xG@=MMAKT-{OjMgM7H+dsqDH^LM=BKMr9g1e<#oQJ!}c5xR>zQoq%Gxg5oCFQdy_ zUE4RiBA4HRH@&9+MC}xr9I7fo>XiU2LkEO?D=>eqbwz`hR#B?usY?+em_Kk(BEzCm zS^Wm%>`M&7Z*FnCKA>JotR#PcZ-hS?T5naYKwPy zud9l-Yu@iL@6ccTuxb1totm8h8;Tf5*easnGbGC&Dn#gogeK&rsJ?r4HebC0hY2$H z!|;F0Y3%;t)eeN;d9M6>l8o(9yX>e$Nl`wj+&NllsZy**Xjpx8n|*Ao>|!YE`WHWX zQJ+-Wjs11i*K54o=`Y*iieJ4km;0?4+E*^JcV=i`v9I5ns(#PDo*q6Cnm3Whn$A76 zj@}nf+_55+weB(UDco;2O?Oi8C_;L`ky?LQ%aBB#ymLnvTqIGs*MP8M$TGe;WAejk z^x-tRo6|_Kj{$5-O;*^q4ZGgmCt^}vobHQwlOzaK8Ql{JT9AW%&6)I}dO1qX+{$9$iSnltH4rx$U;lJ~%l2^!XU8^0c*aL+6eN>>T83GZ^xT`%f_ivA2I7 zf8Q#uU*OFj4w4TC$pbk^uxLxBTEsn9s9*wx=~6n?$+X(wx>V;Eugl3!A-9*xrXWrJ zK^HgoE|`(vt8xVA7R`1TKWQ&A@FE7&XqOU|?2{z0F*8OU9mT3hJsE%bA#{BRT@NF4 zm0b(e0%o@^W)-LOG^Sw4Y0+;YA{KwRS<1l@%lgqqyh_a+y2hIG; z4XZxn!|!s0e20F!B);Zj?D@=_&P9fv^gGLymx(yBREn#5jBNwf%gEP#P-A!UUK^nD zJd!!E)jpgmA5N8rbE+st)twjL|8rQ@YE(7$lQJvURkb=P%KsI&`XjDp*am+XdWlM# zz==L2$cKw=|8wf=Rb2{%YnXP*HIX*2hnhmEz~#Fe!(F4+QC;JD>|Oy>YS}^cL{&7I z3h2v0&nFsN4x-NFS^giw+lTP>Fv443?7(aAPF0%rO0=VxEO$bo8>$juJ{A0mrs7;b z?26kY$@rf@9Isv_--6W9T(f`F-v#M;`6_ygSGm=KzdH`b_kGoNA}VKcJuaTXb?NEi zg_)Fi2kfrNO@iaoh{; z70e?F=D2@fvyKmo;f0V7Y&IyehiVX?q*wvV3knICLf7r#LtXr(u=amsQ+a|5sS8D4 zh$_RNPol0-B;=q4r~Wq997+zE<(x=?8#UuL2Ps-t?mk`ox~5!kH;tfwlTmkZqCi3%VMK7T^jw;{`G%8xl}`!WA>tWDo)&1%K0aIN*%E zMRg}|w#RCw1VJ5X(GV*@KN=qnKX0Z#yQk_;Tc#@|?RTUlQYC*45@sYlUdxg>xR)EU zN9EZk)=?|Z4a*bcBTe^gU*BzJQ$1GMv8uVz*y51t71c2HLh#S_or&*p2a<~6!_#X$ z^<~bl?T$uFe3i(V?VAg2((oBj0yfL70;>2Rl4l92AgWg*Y1t*DxZM$Q@w&jc9K-Q$ zsAM(m>6s#$$lw4I5lzxWPtMbr+7`}g1rp)KwcS6-;-VQEpbEikM zlwXL5a0QJCm<$BLGXAbQuQ$v(d`;nb!A}=okN&xC5lbcN|3Fo|cJ3frs{CFNG zgDC?NYleT{%ZV6IC34XO043xYp_fX{xUXW(@Zi`j4NP?ZUNr`it z*(P>z6mQDYal_sti+ZRcNzIzEBBQr3HAqCc`#paP=V%1Fo7FU#i|brp@bdTP4v?=s z^D$b5ePxb7NByX`(Cl6=VkKwvb+3ZX9PMsFJ9g^P6w0_XUrsW{=q~;vOW{zOaGc7L zW&5IM^;toequ}QjIlUb`d760{c!^_imE@VQ_<52i5qm0L;^v!GwI;E*OdmuuXDzyI zZ_a=Cy~C!di%s;vwybDuxJ(q0=sc-d~Ew9durA$rg&Hpaj;=$SWz zcrVJ(BblA8*OdviZdj{ayoN9tQW%kg^q+rfRd3ZnPIC?(5ltl)kzq8J?Z(HZbtYyk zqqt0+(VSnFx0>33qP9mAqPwy0=~s>Kt&2Hl_0ZXh#J+wXzjhG!L}+m5JCNF0B9>M$ z*}iGKjuDJ5UbpB{yC3ggTRPJj`z;RF7WGt5R9#u;6!h!`19Mj==4Ga-)pl2l$BBPi zo&M}R@w&u?mMD9tCZ+SL)|V=ZL5RT{t7-#>X?$gGH7(uIUs6OkQEFvn3vZ)2a)SQ2lh<&G4B=~hG4Kv&*i)T&mxcT{r? zuiEkyR%JUjj^Z+_A$Tu%m1i7yz`GBf$MZ}r2;Bt` z@Blp(vE$ew;i_@Z*UijoWbYm;%k3*9-*l9 zA$`^>ZrKmJ_<@qaf>bC`>Fo-WU}1^3h9k38^Hox>%GsO|J%yFU6G3!?(M8g^q+ukGB=q$-1@vV}oQbYeZy%LsQ;+4*v)993 z;OCc2Q#7Z{a>d-vbAN)()z*KcZFg`-*sE$r|K>7meFB~m=1s^xzGe_i zRmK6a6jgWmvwY`Nh`!wkKE8~!1ijuh6E;MyNXzRIi(=!$fwTnu9`A9GF;a$k-hN6M zCGpluLvte2r5eR5)ex#uU+AD+-Gc#C^YznGJy|f1SI|k}mB(2*g!hHYfIe{xQ(Z>_7rv)df$vN)#6b+C_Wn&NiXf<^<%~-48RL_%ZIJZ z%~4+e;I7AM(Qmu9uBLzU_tE^w^8=`Npfd|`tr;dpWCVa#nw+CQh*O+E~wYcm>I< zzOGbD17te4D4MsFw*Ig(E?pU!14roC4NIxp*K3zVm>$HI6^qNdfE@?wQ$T61y6@|) zTN*<|N%8@sugf==2>7rZF2O(LT?^Zqns~!DJtocyuucfpLxDc|$bbB~Ow6a8=op1-VJV&a=0OGB9XdS(W_a#_kSs7@)n0Xgl&DU9lo>$w6j zrkhgT>oRb!G3DkT3N0rx{W|QoN570Fhr^eQrGw9%xtTKciD2NQCCd6eN>auC#P>rxIv;3s6`Abfrk2jPp4Zo@(NT;DnG zDf{u$&!2vrWuA4#F{^Be+fTkTToe}>u3Ob%0b@D)>g>TB3*R&g0g$38yQ8B>dS zLzVd6C)Ovb7czF+6BpIdmWv(Ed-H#Ak&O1{%j7ABcYG52#Yf{cE(ZSxMX=D0voa{y zP~-$@8Hi)J=F0%~1s>_>EwHP%pQPCN+a^nI$Si+C3n>XAMIWVj@j;dG>d}_r)Ea5x z46k%*w{)bfHebW7BGWbaozU>4i*JdM{A5#0{W0Qo>zg7ynGGwRNIyI_Mqf%y0CQs3 zOlqpGBzNO6WF@oX5(uobFX%vWBD_HETr+yFw>$W@ySsAW^yA^=%P(Bk&+aU-a*`YQ z-7J3zQ$+N17jVs-$y9={laNyDl_V$C+WmBKl0Fagdrk&bo3Q5LAOpIvE8NO)MGKKw zsjDs$^$v<#=ko?~PJ?oZ;9v!Av6yI>?E|uOBWmRc7!x;AOc2F4RZBpd!+6@ak-|IJ zDL)jE8qFlP7_vrmkv|!_{)8a$SyRz$d52!ctT&Cde&bUPfZHS>dx){k_C0ioD$Eeo1 z+CQrlhl}XM<4wJbHtuS-Zlh-E?le(b+>fDOg%!JN(89=T0}nk^aR*S1OZ+odwxl$$ zbiw3@9+RFS8&3skAtS)V=BO*_CYpb)B-X1$isBKCBz0eJDsW54nVU|E#%oj~){dO` zccbzFw$MN}(wwZzjY}qEu%-1<)w>fm5~fOnI}TbBLu)-Sd`S0hO5_a;6q&`*AgjTh zIHgC;?dql*Nym#ZQ3@nf#FzG?3V%jF zySvdpoH+fWm=%XdjnH=xn_+O;Ap?HBF=f@Pxk=(Tw(81>NHvP{j@V9OZwBaE1D;N% zL{avuI^Igk;afG_S49a5Ew_Kwa=uZ7b<&MyPlR7X2-jZejL(y&VYg5Aq1z`kiuhO$Ce;6f+d&=iv{n@Q*>A?6pNS5PfG|ZA z6;XO13ucf#X`!!V1G=eCd^fVT+s$OG@$h56kIJrL*9B2~-+RX`-dFHJ=(QJ$luuRM zmqDDV*r>5<(bj4S#}t3gKGarIB6e-YQ@&QLAd@9TP-IbG^!enbGRKwR8Y#54agIE>&Q5rRhD=Og%o4ubb_LuevCCl%~4& zVywG`zCS847nI%8GUZEpDcxJHCiejid5c?8)aQS?9I{;`I%=#)J(G!gNF!18vq#sP^XnE4MguEn6S`H@R%6r-TospFVjT`O?7jf(cjpGAms#b{poGu-^_*`gc4fD_ zi~lQf&%L|OoBFEVSNRr7W%|^q6{o0AtshWX`L*FmDhR4*oVFg~=>*WFAkf+cF7rab zZ_$59Z>i0TrJ0nX!QtY2D`+vd-8Ti~Dxf&=%;eSX`oW3jE)&YWv_@+h| zL)~D(=h*zV-kPdzeVP+MgIsHokId}E%&bizz&{$1&}&CKS$-l=NXt1|1&59iZ@9be zC;a~>H^TovxefgPC;HCEy4_d9|3A40@c(~Alq%N_xSFs#7e{4-yuA1U(|XUu6%c_Y zAlN7|)Wn^sF6pSzhM#?*`+SOM`_O9Fxo3lmU#8VR3tfB83nHAnYhXXhBVIT~k*;7s z^{aVlqA(ecv^*;bPXS49Cb&UKsZG7A*Jw)PsEV)tLS0*3iSPX%5=gHSs!^}%Cpmws z1QRX&dXHtrHu1Q91?tk(J8#^+?Or+Dj$pr;_cVsfY3qaMgkED*ghgL_`h(VqK|7LZ zN0HOe5a|yt*b{F*tD51Fd|{r{pqny(b;+{BS}&TWE;!TkK`h%6l4%+@SpZ=roOQN= z+@a_WW%hkkg%m-dhDFQM#jjidUci6F7m)j80Kzrc2yDBuqL*m>M*UQY^+c?YO3cIq zHMDT-lI_L-e<{aFo`sjwiHztq4C!D6{AU+**Xv9;XKt{}rfY(k@>9sGmi8Uz&38HM z1T!WU;RSke6qDaRHIt~>hCq!!qvlDt?l#*X;~X&u+_6rUv7yl;yxJ;|0V{t(AnSJR zQ2+^JF_<`$6H*CbJ~D1_?=qKIz*LaK`v%+`B5 zqtYS_@K|FQ&Z&A*YK7B^swY-m$+_k$rz;a^%kL}Q;YjdU96nu8cx1_3ja}DtSTq1f zv937Fa&eWx39$VXNB`e{{FAh7fyf;?j#^(%y({xXxEl0KBlHqnR=R&6)S`Rr@_DZK7lIfpQy91J|^{`dsz7m%S}CCJ2G z@oL~^eclD=CSQFhO6`AFWAY)oL$d4@2N&S#_A#s0Jy2{ap_-EtsXNVhxI?6@TY2pT zcd@&zD}4mQPW>chNQt!{c3BC?=m4%|)c3%q=%+(tYiUD9~Vvoj}W(lHt1- ztHLl8wB}W_>7@euDzwFS@)>arh$~gOdVCD!z+gndcQ^XFn7e=B*-sbWH)58Ck8eRb86wKT|$5KsI=0g_P4>*m_5G zsbbrmDJ8*H2)~tS21i;DT6yYVqpxt2M}4|mD9yAb&QZVEnK@+YBup0=iB%=R62o14 zS{_?6=^Fg@)IWa_x60urPs$wqV;lWK=TW=E$a*hcw;kCl+#Q=b3&R3S8E>91q6>8+ zgn&acNnFwsJRXSw4oQQs^7?|(RP}b-xw7K;qNxYFSr>n_nIF?( z>WuLF6JX*h4gNR~_9+i;G2q4%c99Z0Ftu?jpsXvs-wlWbwR*;%OsfsNS8KTW)T*Ww zD+8Er$C-ck=|YZxKSt{V%#yn5MaNW4w(22j$nfLw1~0tP#*iqLQRHZSM83 zypYd%2wLH9>yt@Rd)a>oyeWZr60|Cj6OpJZ*A-;o1?EY5 zL)K3h-;{MmG*v@H_e-q^188iA#ty@bLjN?}_CbgEq!@E)sy~ZVLX_w*c27)T#!A+K z=)=$<^dX7gs&%_}Q>jG1&r2W9DRGlyk_n(zIuc2`uP!S^mlYQ>W2ZcX_L(3W`vp%} z!eoD0KkPd%8ljeAQ47q`n-hsuQPf{v;5Y>}xl%}7tJGb>PSZ@%1Jl&YwjI~IDn9+Y6 zlDkIFz`C6z(t_pbj#?b3!XHH?LhrU92&vx+x{%$9%oFik>5G?@+*3(LEVdW!k_j|J zJ1m)N-!J#*q(TC57hpWSczyA&9CIJr_VF6ka^C~K^E#M2@a`^yG_~&d8nj0)y|0;5 zNR4t2t^v#NV<;GXxfBtg;-vRDvKoJ!h!VlZz|UQ)hqfs@x`jEdMO&T`NhLWJkx=Ht z*3Z9c7VqaiI;cjye$-jnyfMdV{S#Z6@ng3PTZe?S{b}C|&nVZi8(!odfcF2?i@@b7 zZjdKKKy%vLl2o8j`@KXwF@izAIl^aoIHK?pke37))Sk%UP_vVr7@`V@iaLL{`fL+> zUR41ci89EiLCrF9C{(tOSiV^{5vfiLKJ^hupMQ>aYqS(`IVKf&tf3xvv6z|(5VLr5 zFSJ`s_CLC0vj5R>C;MOAINATnZ6^C)TszsH;c^pmAfRVBYOP{XkU`L*tzVJWpz*}XLg!g;-w#%CkPmqn%89!ZEQuu`rKaT_2XDYcTXpKp3zdJ za7h2gL9re0-=i?9*}F^0ep5Vw2QsgUl-Nzdd?j;#w_WiJ9G=rzU-y4Hld^(WV9}8j zK(^#NvcWp3sl$@xuuxeliI01@XDpT^wx5Ykng=_JC||@VNYJ?88>FyUHuzh2eM`y) zPvc~H$&!7oVh)W(T0cHvxFeCU{e7v6Z&$@^l%mZ1J6^Nh#><-4lOg5wgX#ITo{@BTx8gc)FjKA2rVO6?CFq>5!=w*4v*-!B(anj4qaVsT6+!r5#$&PxHkddO~X28(Ic# z?Y%On9(&^kDd6TgLbSe@3=D&h=!kDg{9+KLEsMOl`sHgaDU0qwi`*q{na}j4Y2|2f z?Ew(w=rxJQ9tEnYOU8vF{x;vJBY{@A{k5K6Q6PXLI@Z9D z(+UTz9KwHLIJ?$^nDOqUn+8`nRgsd7ICb-2vr#XV894W<_(L(RYN`17BPL^1?nG-f zj30$CbW#WgKL9`04f<_`SpHUi8r;%nPE~7$r6o;>V#aA4yHQw8DC>C&PHhS_mNV^4 z=y%D;(Y;(e{BvnFnkGy@*cj?sYty4GFbwWeY?Xh3IZFc4f#zJ@iM!%-we=Hty33q9PrNT6_@28GH%WYI?J+o6_SkLNR8VNt(N1 zpzS`zP*wppE8v}bdHnt+v}0yDaO&T#jVmOrhN#Nh!LYtl+`YK0(|fc7P-hZPF8=&v zg)1Rb3>8J5ng6K_up;cy71;AAn%A2;#~Xiw+Er%Jq7c$dNFoMjVCnDTnu_cxRkqI4 zJ-VzO_PmLU|2?86(kvw*tcU_sJt{;4Ny=%#9Ohh=Ji|eHd8Hd}rGYkwV3N44Sge`n zRD6GXQ`@JrgW!eSuO3lu6G+k%z*fKe_U~PBx2YQ%fkMbgls;3nbaf@ZUg7izD?)#- zXzJ#t!m+noNSW=gtpTYJ#b}WSQG5JWe)iq>^``Xm-XQ9_(wa&@qWP#RlO-c6}>p}d;gcE=!VkJg$+6HGYqpaqb1ld1Q z_~8X88$t?IWBF}Xwa9*YO$y$?#lR<~=ax0w8q8ntkc zphuy*q1So*>II7WprWov2{0Ag&z7DOB(XKpynU|Abv5$TXD_12Yq6FB>>6+zw7Y~? zsi+jT8-1Adkiyt#yup8?_#Y1xO-GV|o3SENFrqvD^5wCrQG!A=uMq=bEbgF+4`ah@ z<>|TP{l2N1eQcVlCB)yrJns6K3ehkjpCw}b{+wJFS zgq$Ry3hBw4XBFob&mR)bd;*+Kc5$vf41%(0crtLeMw2VnYvzB1l7}(aRE_>Ff(N@R zvfYu`_H^-EU&v6CPvoK8krD~(dgc7eBuoUb&H~cg-?=>==3cc`E_hBX#~wtKWl{(1 zjmRd7awCP^7UfbT>OPu zQ&I(GIs95SZZ3bZH+wL#la3Niu{^%W+hxU9rkgYklxjmM$7Eah6`p07F74k#*YMv!|EfH*PDtdp`qDemI?hnU~m`SW#a$Hkp?;fLtEmkGykP-1})K@v|E_L|@#7L-c<$edl8>fUE5!KD{4y61TB) z&f_LgxzwyQTnu}>>$OX;3NO9M$NIkBy1ep1dPOA87vl1qv3sM;HKd{Rky?2^qKqsj zZRtysJZcx`3DCx^DvMr#EVLsM)x_XH5xTh6?Kh{ZRky9hx7)@?Ip@}`W{DU-#Os){ zrIDFNCbfT%#E&B$>}X9YJxEcEb-&4a9C8c0|L0j&dA}MX*8BI}L=u(EIW{>k6U+21 zBmMa6tC?dSm+Ln=E)RJq&P1ye8#DHGvASf|sERSN)s>nG?clxzTgAJrEmiTY=sAQs z1^1WtHON6nPa&{%Ol6)xgZEDeW+c`~pgiu=#kYS5%~a}5WB^vxoaYJr>Y6^NzCm(5 zb>#4K4a(z6R|rZ*?*I3%_j;GJRxcyu5s3TtGUB9DR#b=}I6BpDpo$2NY3nd4d{vK2 z)JGfoLa%YupY+pMG>Jb_;yRUhUm;AOLyQic6i~u0H(n-@&@i3VR3{N#pY_4mtnCN1 z*2I5BF&*AQM}k~SK=P_-!P?&IltZQ5{q-6D&M23qS^Z)rEyVEIhbp9irDA3R>Z8$_wEm z$ikfFOxPsG4Y=)mRu7^#r*nR>X1U2<#$^1#D60)(1 zx%WAW4|(O;`sAFeNA!x3gu0*fiHeqdNKnH$cl}CrYfp;SY3LnhrMZv4XR3d~HyXc} z$3BH}6zDO!dsnFokuZ$sscTH;bw36smG4hvJ#6iLTyoJE zeTCfN0~}qZlNmwZl})h~a{b+26`xn$ z^@R~Pj$BrSd83PPomf><)F^*bbx0r@W$daeRGoycV4O;!DQ`usQ}r5@(f~u2YV?Zt zu2kF_$*FEjj0=&aAS39b*DZvo(8#Kf{B_;xcd4U683n|z%9%L@d_;6Af}k<#tI!pa z8%fuyNu-vV!%O!Fw!ZY8xIo;h!1hw9GU(dNNMTKevt0IdU-(HuMDc%c$)0Cn1tvHB zBBVjAse<-+8n$xWVIdxTQ@zw4;ZO&u2NL+iMgqF{GKP8y}{WhZct|F_#ibMxG9_yQtI++IH$n z4sWkUapvw^*5OPQ#ML2!n>eN-8dkt@Y^RoAayno1t_q}FVxs*Vi4*A>_tJuqUCa-| z6PN6q;AJ9qqCCMB?JD%AdUutWc|f7YCrNiuA(;yrXOXWKXQF?h6CRabF^ zs9CVZ#7=`K>-J4LGo{LEyGJ-c6D^CVH)Btzn|xOn7qtk!U}W4MJlFV+NvL98Rnu58 z-Rez&Uvrkh--!thdpEq+)1Xp}5m7P*gDbH>n10$A;0j?Tac$vz*sJ+)vXke>CJ!WN z$n4M>HJ5^nw#AtdKP0=KmG!13*>9Mli# z+=qs4>~I$oV^=S?D=}+Oa4;<#a&;3k&SQM$rJ8s*6Z2~oEB$jXOX&`NFgvJ zo0gzBUUxTYu z#3M*&j!UCW08>l}4m);yxztV?^4^=4K=J2Q0O)@v)>JXLn5m~U@`F>jcLOp+aaR3~ zvU?KZrx(Im#%f$Va8KQ#Jsw<>@&Of-FY+(ys8{EA4Amn%qW-|^ zEp);~pu!bsqjye}QJGs^wHi;v1U~HUs#OF&V4NpZJx4O))1z(ilCb^=OI&Q)Zg4r% zkmi4MVo4%S8+ALp7lh`|Ke~y~{Iid4L1_Nm-uYPT?`lHxXZL{6T-+Nrv+PSxigM@E zSy4_hzy|)s8}Q!47#?$$X8@l#)|ddb$sGxP#LPIBCVHrDeWsXHgn@$aV#SShu+nx& z?c7ZbI-2^rd+bpHF{kJ0;@f)8EPLd&Ng#h@-PWF7{K$?9ecXsB?nqblmq){^76Q!n zq;el+$5zQ`9_<23rB;u%!$iG4`0r6svS{}3pqvDSk-2CLp#*ZdW)(U`!p|OHpGZ;Z zU~6`@w9<`>)hnmYgRG2GgyGR@<6Rk3<}iRJ1kngJK?#FfsT46XsZ7X@R_-(c<*LODg=0HA`t%_1Mb?sPg{S669)Rr*j1b*i1%by?3!CSJnAFPYlUVxw8c-<0CA?ItQyBpvjmZB3+u%` z!Y^p-vk>f2^5qE>O|&Bki$ANTO(W-jwl|K$8H=7>DSl*1#8yk(1$KLz-*1j@Io3L0MP__=XrV) zHfFKiO?EO2Rgene4Vv0ee1*SXTiXGEK!rn5tDDo4lR=f#Lk_G;e!_9p^p{b8WIy+P z;J4v98#{Ua!mo4%OdTXPvCtEmXd3I!FscD#Bc|7~dljtPM@r65 z7vHndOO1==+@ZSIh)W5k?g@_65UKK#iJg_wIB4sb7@H}(V_Oe{lK9KhR;_2u!y>T` zx(ga!lxc({8brcgd2LzJJn%l%r})I(h|%&>Tyn{Ly%INwF*u%BfOwLB^qIM)a!FTu z#UsOUm)j{2V3>8K%;SRnz5F8Mi^iQVk(9c$C?N$>xJ@cnRMr~I#e|HIIeI|mtIJiI z3%)6viU^k@)NyaC7JJW5?@w+#y+6Cn>HW#Ir*{=4ma&!cgE_N-Qjqqw;H6Rju!32I zOgy22&2&WfrUltH1FVvNaW=`|(K^kT1K^m-a~N|{F>mp*U5r(Ma^x8<*wl*rYc=CB zLT^l5J_}biNLwP%7JZzz4wJ!d`l{g>O1JGnI31;_%U1Mfawluiu43j#y>TTwx*K^Z zje?9a3qFzMF|%Xzr~4uohKG>0xbIrJ`+zRIK<4nM6mwcZlJ!7;;k4whEaxgzkxnES z8$)g*OR@1do|^HnblH;oB=l^rlr2%w*f87G9YoY)^hkyGrCp!(gfEMoso~Y5T0KwH z<->wKv_|F9#;tMhOi6qQVASvztYB>5YlQPi~Vqe0pu-z&dmV zl}PMcIStsqelVGT!>`ina5g4qJ=gicvRh@XmDBQX99k9s2?gcyw7Q84eQ0@OyZA#g zT=%ntuGiUs@b3k4EOQ6$_z(X7}c`$`|H9-!p`>g~zE~tS?@VJmEB1 zf~;wlYrw*Ph6y=ik!TC3J~gph;ZY0Q`k?fe&6a437P5g++D!$0>N^e;QTxqsb}by5 zYf+s&USIw_>5hGNW0HFtFQv~vyE(}{>r@IoLGV17H1})h^eB)onuqRs?gG`n-+I;i zX+UQ-TXcz4GW$~~*z_ipiPH=k$=RZf?!))!hoHrUNyleT~k3LU&|GWx*N6nsjgE^a`0uUYz+k64|h1M1Oc>Ehcb6ke7 z6bXcX6CNm|SC-L-r?Z~2v*L^Zk(_-jSjIlgxVO?vRci^$iKWk{KN5=2a$$P`a{gvLCD zY6;t=4q%$TVjUr_&7Deu3I7}>P5i*?W~x`pLXPFeBzeJvsn-!+NNgDQwT+{K@1jK} zrxuud-Kejb!aU?U7SM{2_DriO|d_)ccle!as1JBPi4yKBp!BNBG zp|AXSNn==F%4iiyimf~cRS!CYmrtdCs_yt3_g=(1oEc9N1``7QoXBzF9}4Jfpx&?i zrKu<&X|b7mGYt#RjPq@K+8ufHcVNhwpF}n3r&FpO-Z+|Iz90PY&u?hreDTq(_~W0? zn>YurPuyoV#vu~`(h^f#(KEq0QroI8HrrzKI&+GQNvW#$@N~RxwmgjcQvdIRCyj-eV*{Zp$Fy{& zbh-HO_{MaMyW1?JHw(3y>uJ-19sVY%#n;>2X))Bp+uw94b|WQ#ObM9@i3JjDU-S_G zM^XNm+37KRIfvhs5Qd=l+L9)9;AIj7n^>L}-11c7S6@dsKB0LN==*DbHB?Y1SMB6f z<2NBEB&^ zq+aY!aA5^>AQ*Q02?nP)fgaGtxIsYNP*>HZOM-+p_A$ z33L4l#oA)cmb~0)Dq9FC!`RV|LlEBk6YK3?q4~`NCK#GWXrNGBW|Q+_q_p>+=lI-hsNgN zCb`w;L7xXx^2pO3XWADqGKne;+)*Zt%tG`Z$uGINQbG7d&*DFJCCw*E6ChVr_%V_4_65(n;N0PVIwnor)rY4+xcu7gvaRaI z&IF9q#b*lERC#fpmsGVJh_1C6F4kE!JF(4nb$5=8} zk=kPd-(p~YtwO|%(mUK-aY{#2*(hCzuxz5D;<%=C03Ymtlr zlZ$RVg$OUtd%fU;$W%r-;gb9q3;g8sdlaI7^Cm;`qhp)w^>> zmGBms64t1poh2!C`UhRzoc)sgM?OlI4HUD&(amAY)-G&^lo3}mOcNxj`8L8yx192= zJI*A8eg>|OvYv5GUWJMAj`}g=8SzifM<6&yN$}0-Rzj5fe+P!$G#H#^TV+`I3T<1F3_WLhYQ4W=k=^2!@* zI}?$Inmpo>xZNb(AS0EBEo-gy zL_7^M=_{@>L|Cj7>92mnL;QnI^Ufd9>o43ZWVYf<^Kj~C>BZ-?jehIo2h=P1oDV;};DcIS zk;`76)?HVZSG>W;pLxNnA8h}Y54NY}e>Gu-e=g|1&+9@yzgzR>{{{=bP2nrk3LCyPcHu( zAN|{CpcgD`{?8Qa&|#O)7#`6V{JIE>Dt=QAN2Q71rJsJe3HUaU_cQaI?DM{rKOOJB z;RD~uFMYE!MjPyhWKMKV+8+jgt0>QnPa^9OjL+c(r|g4aRxg=b+Aa5Udv0!@Z`H$x zTHd=%F;3q76rY>oZxtGl5>4+iw=iG#b9-)XzhVv{Au`;mFuv3N{p8909A9RBXX9Gg zyUZ@G)ce^zH@jbY(42^BQv$Z7?E5>JiVrXHDc}2ve%{d3rX+L0ntIoN`R+Q`9}G^O z{ICA{+vU$a=Tud1vleeV``=uS_Pdo1+&fL?+eG|tGl4%Z4g3xs%Q%G@*=gGy2}bZE zN`+yUO6FF&i|_SQcMT079);>h0G;=@-y?mmm+$M{5X$f{dpe*nXUJKx2Z*smQR#u=V1Yu z3s$u5o9qM56MPv{v<3D7qp_?hcH$l3`2W2KS3;hKU`&R{~Myv+D;oQ zx}$#taZSY>Q-D?lM%KMn*RV=Pu@X!>0)INA|g2{Q2Za+m*4iwqh z=hC|nJNrYf8QafC8$IjO*vXE{<$k-!&6;AI6wv zER?-7kteeR*GS4wC^;2lrhK0128U&6Lm{*sDgn;sf;~26R;XOlT%vhIF6w(G{@D3lw6eHu6vQ5YTh{oe;>)1E#{XD{u~upR6H*|PO2tJM8dtBdA$!r z-eGxu*B8uJBov%C5s+Mp5F2D-zzI>jYInIh?t_zm+jiI`IEfVfsurU({>taS6|0O+ zf9YDtHG9#jP=%svBM|&Yy4~N3?`9uoZ9j87`jj-pw;ar&jmmg|p9{Y<&WErC`b_uv zh{~t0vfP2Ip80B238gMqh3|w0b)*3V>LhFh<)(|8u495#Q8fZ1#nP?N{e}KZ_Q$~k zUH46YwmG9;+Z9mrk1 z9J1EIh-qnnwsw?<7FsZ9M+*rs{#AyS`M;PwTiLt#L%fi6N5U+Y2Kl~+bVk9wd}#Q} znD;u6$z=h+%Se+e{&1N2mHcx0LSfK}Ilk6Lp75L&Vlsu3TOQdon z(~qD_Du`mEj9fdL=t`2I59%r_`no18=w1P9s+3@ci%cG;dqo~Dd(g2)p1&<4IA%*_ zw$MoStpt_KzB;xSU;u9;x$dYJQmJdJte(CU6%d(oTI#tAMFEOrwTlB`8y@|CP*?I( z=8aoOzxRZRN>g>H#?aY-4|;f9v{%&$x-{<&$Kb!hA;^8eb#Y3{4w+e35CjZe04S$DLSmg2e-!vV5H>4=u!VthC!mP?4|!#r3n;SR~;^TYw! z`W`%_$q|P&g3ahpnH87p0a!18nOB&%d>a5<%m;fcW?1Btg;T8mY$za) z%q{K*XE*)Z+B)fGfB`O13XfjiZol}?UY9STFkXgo0qAPw1`ubLrUbPDz5}_wHX;A{ zrKkU_h1_y&PsO z|M{l+rh?#0xBPS2qa29g>Zi?E>Xex6wl*Mw6|vrPex}K}=UCTlyfH|&F=;X8qrkn_ zsEl=mqsD}YQ;i5A1_Ci9z!k}W!;0Ue=B&xMC2Nw6^=K^S>mk#On{9>4hU6ICek3N3#^piKqczpU+8IN~Z^2aAn zPad;7@#S`KL7~lsH&;>{DeGnxrHMpo?-HED0kb7PUkmDYb?36Fr|~?%^%cs^YYOll zo|qhjs0h-BE)uufDiNd=9%~U;gtCJj~2)+;ftDTgPU^lNmVLYbxeS z!3vi{{g0JJxpX8KRrZ4QTAAmZeM>HAq%(!wn<#x$2!Of3)c9iadhKoZ{*uD&A0jWi zS4ott=h_N4SFE#QshMu7JEX%zd?NA&le`RQWBb^4QDndvpVNm zrcr>+V-JdIE$}b2iu4rUyCBLfeS4Dqo=(J~356QRs5di`fMXR%U$smcYnhIivugWD ztjlEDc4TA)q+mAYH*m=hHSlN93_@vy&P3Huh6K$RUcp6wde)oVoK-9;iRl?~IkDC? zdS~fcD4uI=%4{Z;IaD)CQ2^2^Zztu^D69f4YgGMEkTsitlv}YF@x*j!Q3}&U$jf$U zkweWYgtHu5*N~k!kMet;+*M7{cm_OfSFJKJi=q(J>Lq1-OUk65m{3J4o zRR?tFRfMVgwS^3hjEM%DWC%NHmRSpb$_ZJk@OL6ozh=V=)gW}c3~eX5hhrS+Sl0Fu z<&eX}L}>D431eb%3w#PuZw{y%Mc<)V$9nrdc>vlet^MAj$T{Y}-dt@Wt^Eq4I;vjrY9_+0kiZOlB>q_T84Qc@6&ZY5`WYBvY#I-E{25DX#; zb{vZG>b4FU7KVg|3ZCCh=W%bRX6I+uR$@PUlS-`WEjH)A9#iynter)7;fj@bJKyI7EOMj^$jo0Tr3m6xOw++B5zk;@I$ zx<=ofTs1TWU~muf0222CunymHew+bVxMDze8(IMQS>BuM7w%!r`k5BHJ31tOfV*Nk zD_@wn&xR=KoTb)Z_Dz_XAq@?OSH9|&N?qlDy8YKKZ+v{(qsC{D4$i{Jb2J>`tX`B{ zCPyicJgK7_Ufwn6+!JQ#V?2YdSkTt&mRQCdHR^fTJ7oUSG80`WK+6x8CG+xB(m>^7 zOOn|6xv*F<;LvV%_{KxYJX8URL9^=pcJWa!TwL0A)=T_gtDpU z*pl&cp00>BIrJt5MDP0%SBlw~L&Z>kQUv-|Nm+poC0`31Eldm&yfx@*9ctl69So_> z)u;tBoGb7k84tT~)gmT5%`;S-lp+TV3qE1Sl*W@^0ulo9PyiHd7_qrIW4ec(zWEHD znbP`8@q=aH)IXZ}f;@F@L*#Un%~oM*8*a{KK`P7gg(fs?;sML{-nuVC+nPCl!giZ< zwnPs6=*Bg}YR$~h^kj<6hQ`pi1#UpI?xq(hw-19VEJ6qld#xywk!u}ObQVr72KZ!E zUN;~?=+RPv_9#FaxqY3!?-?9foj$8QDnA}VRFEkmp0w$!RONG2((InSaTD(|5 zP30lT%W&339Fn=W^1$s3G$tSjajwa>HI>9U<&pKv40jco||No73~)4Pud=4}tjKbe?2 zxN^RF>HDoDAsE0Ud6(*#LdNSQ?zg9jTZ#M=0gkJGkbj>%egov+)A-HjzW&k)-i8BS*)jgMO(nP4@qcmP-uT$@^F0cTCOcYYxUR$ zmM`7r{{gm$l`~{1H5}rUE{Nl^BdVuzDoM|lZCvK)6PGlH@a0NDC+CgtSZw1ISqz;gvl*ZTg_zEf8AGMC z$LUmd`ePg6JQT6Wz<`cpYY#z9SPl%?60$hQHa>~x7Ic%9H{P&of~I}Wf;=O~xXU8-kZ^dj7KY<^4DWrxR3)BX4J zf59x@vqZet_A8<3xAj|8nna=;~MAG#>4NqdK~Fe%A9kwm~T?Q*ng!3v;~{ z4#B5%X&+C2XWF>X_{8mNWKeF1HBit&MmfHL@jTW@xk(8UV@Q{Ft?3%Cdf-ycm=n#$ z)k4kv*lbRym_(!NXUDc&%f1Xnuxksn?75*+O?QmaR(#>^u?yl^n((8!|v zJ(1%|g9wV<**-4QI%phv0Gv6??(>nYoI>d2FuziDUoeK7Z@yk!WE5~2IDD^Kb`WCNO zI<@?|4N^8Ho5#OkR=9wmD2#B39H(#F2BZ!h0)uLj{C{-InS2g!jTl>w(_r?9TAeECo! zkirzOWpT93(cYoOpY_v!+Wq+O=lygj@8ZwL*)~fq812b_vnEoZf}ReZ@fDTcp*@A( zhUx-=P8qXIHx*gPXIw8D6tQEb?&SGjJoZ~=h>fEZ)qd=!)5RJ7TvycIc9?TrCJ&9c z=94HR@B}+p|K;J#J;CS-;^23YgU$Ei-Ku{#b#0`~$gT;>qxVWS(ySUKQ>>zpbtC?S zeX>fF+w+!x*Wt?vH9w`OmbPEmroIzeZv(#DMXf9BJd`4apJ?a~Y2KJl*G511(>+}% zato9rD@Y{JVU}mkC|J%1el;_$s^|$7xEagl#yiz4a}+IFFjm(dtN7$5p9Nco7XDH{ zG`V<%&N`s(Jq$Qt!t}q&+d-0_s?nSdYe*;R&d29)q7J97tsGqK$mH3xh?QLS2|>UC;EjvDzI%8 z7hO+LVQjIcIEBZAW=RqTPUh9u@UQ9TuZ~>x8|OuKNQ_|DFd?vrRt0 zKMv3Kr{z3)P=i0yVL}^_E7cf;*A@n9X@G?wExL*ZXk*E%cDj_(NhzEYrpJ}DL2od9 zKTW9C-yjvW-lMsJCER-sm`Iu;`Q6v?bmPH!7%-_BGps&)l`6Ag&BA#cXeQD}O=O0D zjME@Xr!qrw_a6&rsDYKV;{#-|4BmPj<;gMzt;lg2-d)UHI0MYHAik$Qp;kXsyre>K z2&LHE>p-AaO2UK+3$rL+hXG+tk%=dl0cQ?UwJ zM)_FA(pGQ49pBvK{V*OcOQfE|4pa+&zKB19u++sz-bwN6Q?U`HYYS{z^?YM<*0PjE zM2?CbrU7&v-Ix1>-f^77&~`WG9Epsfo}^(?RuA4X9Tme$fH6k*2z8|Ho+vvjaV6@{ zvzES%qmk_}BLCxd{)qc_@GO^NnFQv8RXv)dJ`LuUic>IKRagG#vY%!}fNa=*{Zb01 zMVEg4D(*l(5|=$4XY6Bg(zX655pdroawVG{@+j6c&YaKXxb8pRpQa$yozNnrKqPp5VN6_4lQ;Z&h5DzGMP_*|_F+5$@*q zD3&RyUqcYtjApatS4GxMZSd0Q%9o1q}evTAP>kZ6D zQ2Ix?z<}d36x<__-Eg;me;71#o@Z$T{k1SRvJZm_;|?fTnzVLmJ=Ey56A7k^UP^j8 z;x8~q2n)dY1!)rOsq-i?Q!=R&N#qBN@6x{}9@uGSuyIe~#XB@IlO!i3oRl-+wI*Nq zOZ*=;X>ANCJr|8PqCPj4n>u(}NXX4z9uv9s0VqZ%o1A(p7;H9wiC2Q0@6J9%+4XvG z;Fi!6;8g=f>tdynr;`C@GX)=&RCzkJ$MW0OP>XsfHQa!uR^@@%urOZmlA&?|LJTzx z%sDIOPogkn^2n(J8sRvTjLO2LtPW$e6h;j_rTOBAuO4C)sY6D$50S_Y6bDD*rq=)I z@SSK?%AJ;dcu~ZE5pF=>P8@XC+A$Vk>Bpe-(t~Rdzbo&Sdo$$XN!?f6&6~Qdm0v6G z0J%M6K9@3L9^7dV^9_kqIuGxL$|Ba8uXTo98}oUn$PTzOe|p5SAcE`FUOB*d4)RHh ztV6RJ8W;2Ha$x3&%$Uq#f9=MQ=nz8?b)u^}npI7tSEVL@EFLge9!7BaVtE)QBSO?k z^-j#L!`(c8f#A7*+An?B>9a;~>{D6!M^+RLpKROKwhTls;$H_0u5aOlO=As}eXt;z zc(J?mID8ylakzN*Gq|mM_&*+o+=^sF6UzxctCC#Vb6O}M_4364hfK`ZI*_mgeX`w_EGp6EdvbP0Ls zyPhtIm_yVl71s$$XSdsQXdlZpVldo<_ETS!wrTT!8#7VWVB3E^p5lK1Rq)R};Kzc} z*vtF{`p=mJiSm%-aDN-unYnS--$@LCkL>ZS?Y)mfuKe&HC7cZ^$&7uVKw=*OmtbY6ym!l*jvi!}mKpL#N@*0r7%n zTdFjVwD5+j8kV{9NMer4-pc+^8!mWw;kdegr4YZnC;(B%@71(~^%O!VU*C=ydTY=; zph~yiU&D~e=}>(#xAV+qa5fHF%boXP=-Lj<`OC@%99jm9O2g@=p;qL3tS)j0$A@$O zKsR5XK2jL9!Dd@`yQLWY@L$e+Sc!Rt7h!95?g;-0A4lf)Uz)6CO=xQ+F6kIEzZrmk z@K^L$C|oDv=_ZgeUK^QkG}uupr=XznFQp!rQ?AE(Fh5Pp0gqu;wG$2-ie=|{SdkIG z>0+f6PTC@Iy)^m~E*Vf+?2ArrR&ze~VJ1<-@|S^n*8IXYRg z;~!-O1Hg`;ba>=Ec`?$dwy*SN2;<{_lOd5=QyOlpjeL}sF`58LK(@aP$#p#Eb0&zw zKuw2}OzeX!%$Wv_Jkw!fnuqYBOxf~Ay;Tt9Uh4E*URUAZxe0p_nM|JN^y{gx21RQ1 z)=E3HtVzG9ATImxmsRtIGqzk+2kmXl$_!Ox*9KJ>lJDn?^84gPfxvTC58n@e{UFvF zfA(3EhEvYya3d{0O43pZeU~!+JzlFS3TtCPyHZ;v7=&d@SJ`EGxM)R4#4FBfu1P_Y zpdh)#MgLCV_tEdqgTruiUBaptInA5KyV*Hmc@U!?^fa+5zBMlFN4#%?v!kfq(p0Cq zyk#@f@~P?9VL@T&SKX*MwJP#TJoIhMe^E)=J(fN3>0>!PukknKRp_v^mylqkb`RG? z+X~CTYPIUVi~EBwV%AY2H?S30s`7ApdfF|uV1JxvjU3~>aqUgiSoZo}%ICWoj@q_z z=`13B*Szii?&USyhx9J#YEr4Uc$GxsC@+4GYlsOBPa3_Y@wAcYT&cQob(bHge?o2f zwamIb9|jfm=@DN_;j;-o2-?7j`R-UX#Y0$RCjv?9cr9y7=A6&v!*OF{{fG6p2GdOL z?aQ1bSSB419TA*AcV;orHGJFY{q^zWT)|-9$~#p-fpM6Ht?P3JOZ|8~seZ0kC>UPN zs*u{vw%&ud-DE_*QQ0v{g~9sXe0gPk{uG~lG?bS}Nm!4f0WunA^T z9o=QWU!DvWE0y!i18+%c*ub&%x>3<`eLmX{9Nv`&&PDs-Z%_Geg6oO-m97`ifR3oTA5jNH%|02$6!LyLdf6EL@rOG)_ zbrKuBPy+9x0~0TlA-f$6)iD4;>LseIS~-*wFVu3ex%{+vk6fs95`qgO!Q4J{j(s{W z%HiCT;ALQXD8%s$2AH-ilbW<%mGjd1*TiveoYEIk1PZI*9DX$`b!y?gdHee>ISHpL zQ1Y6`v)w-Xf%)w+0xoX?e~kZR$D5;FK>6{8JEBJn&vc6$sAY)sVJq%U_8)Ef9tHAI z)6pW&IW_YM4aMBeL)+*5<=D?I|7)9hpMgrM71)jD}+)x0!@KnAe%bB&Uy z*OVt*94-&8sUXLpD&^`eBl{uDXlSjk6ja%a;{*PX3p{>jRn!4RfB1}QB>BsK4|13! zqD~MCPzKmc@>XLyaMGmJBm^?NEB)5vc)YAW(zKQ~b8kGFz?IoxU7)7kUmmHiH-fBA zGkTB^@D*3h@T*aTkOOHAfoh0(f=e-03W`@qh=^3UM&^9XJ|(WZ#x#LyzvuCCMDzS~ zxrX6DHpu22JNIz8e|b9(&R<=N7@{6O=;>o8U5M4ekY1VnxwN@+xLIy^WtQ$ zQd6JKZW+KA;Lcan(z)ZWQ`JHu=VN71gvWPY@X%tyg1ekcmga^YeN)aYArK)shp%b_ z3y6Lbl>8UlYy||iC;OtWllBn|V?{Gx7~+>dKO68eFH-Xh9|~A&*}mHMuZ#~&ihc5O zFv(wM&qeg2f55H9*06Gu=47@%87a8k5%S?LRYaWqh~vKE-TC8Xx;)jWjn~a;*q2}w z_fbfWrKUs}FrP$!#b`yAsz@ZBBe@Es5wG(_#jyx%qM9R?j%zv3L zN;^@kzCUYwDed-~Jfy*QR=9h%b;_n(#@Tg>tzlx|8Z?oTA=@OUZ_=>UsVu!D;Ha|8 zs}Xcf0?|4DU=Ch4z1B|1RzG^>D@WHM2a z!tRDo2<9O=e)(mjDbZ*P$nxP}!`MZ@8NVWqEd?bU3}qd>9^Tuyfde^p9#ZoSG0c<_r|Uvecyty`{}`>qw2 zy{zb5&KkqFw-^=y<=wh3a&#(tqWkfkj#lEfk>OorYx$_aTl8GB%t~7GE4e9?VZ&$} zrc>*59T0L(Ilr!(V&W0e>XGM;LIMq1b2+}pCDpTr_|qp8N70vaV(K{yk|3{oNhUGC^|emXUl&G?vSB zC(QcBy^+sFAe28f^_S>spGP4J2!*hm-UGOTb*QnDb2Sp#=X=!>>2|J|F2&G(paeoz zxHO26HY9qBi3u!IEtPtCy-Sa|-y=^Oe+9o?S6j(yX^dxgr89@K=sEikFg` zC8IC2C{C9Q19Qt-q|TW&^K`iy2)1NB$D@1#0;I`3cT>T|3bgSnDxp&iAZd}1e^t2R z-YH?2rOFP)7O+${#QuTqivNat;Ee5XK_LpG8So2#V%LZdi*2D|PXh|0UCrS8kY!Xq z-Hj3)G0;M>yck{mRx8+x8D7K+m67cs(GJAtgXsk~b280?V8601Pq3=GMRsHZsnc|j z(kPF!PX4rnsfn3{RtQiYB%p@;fACvg_n)qL44#LUhx2rK&GxlY_#VA5Hj$O;J*?=? z!+n?rIrG{CA>B^J2uB5DY_raApnwaCT(l1YGnJJf)O{9(%M2Q0*-~GK8_#fFG+8y0 zRyXWBmDr32B=z*c&!cjv%bH_<`x+*1YYMy^K#ZfrVfeGM5qJNtTmz3ge~-n)bMVks z#1KIjJgN-XL{BCeIxf^CNkzY$OieR8%6^X`2^b3(`!CApeBS+hcwah#12*Gl!bV2r z@$bq<`6vqY(|h_p^K7VY0(jKz?#in!uVr7(>hgx_jzx0DJANOKm?4y%JM$$#4JmC= zi;+i9rwxuoF;RDP8V$Uvf4Rh~#M)Zfm^u+g(XX<9qS*+hXY?Ia3mg4~g7CAM@7b`x ze^oLC8s@qnC~sgtNFBy!SBYcQQ1e;s-cL36{Y)>B$CBHVzvUXv|2)=9ab$nM=??}Uu#0PhCdSme^cg7ug z$vz*OQs76WVU$HnmNV^@QD!LV&8`|H-VmPJTX|l7(x3Dr_(Gq_e5t&(UrrzX{+Yi4 zU!u!EdByHi;km3;BvU@k8_RVsz}~*(x(+;w3tRe_9&;5rg3nYMm=X81-tB?=n(4K7 z|9rFZO{1ejgftcKe+b)x0D}3A6;2S2=v`$Ar7=f+%r})n*rrQmpHht{t}S%UfNFii zvi44TIHxl3SwQS4hb?K`{3CTg@@piiw8MX)iR98nOMO!rjDfoIv1iA*#qaFkObZ0M z+n{&u`xOPb#%0g+QUn?-+qqwyfyIFq7q6Raf3o{U;{$wlfBUrF^FUHct2O}otogWH zC2G{V>eg>#(%J0QgqdKw2pdn*PuT#fhlW;VAPv)MGX{Z?>0_%gN`IaCqI$+(*Cu@3- z00o*I^<*o;fA2CFwZ9g&){?A@4t05xA2_a#Ps{VB*y9&VIRq3aa>OyQ$(G%p;2(cw z-n@$LMBW{7IvcBQGj<$fR*JKPw2X~MXY23vbz{?2+Z27W`=!kQyDj6YStmAQY%&i- z(Kcr9Q%yd95}}-1)l;}SIV5L;a2**NghpECJlu@9sU+T%pUq#S30Yv#03 zkJvO=^KM%7{$}tr4mIzD%9>Ut*Rw06s~Rjt0c<-e^oED_ur>6R+s_6EJ6x7K zol&JwBYc`*ZI(sW zGq7%nOb6I5(kMxyL5F!!#bOGys-;Z0_bd3h6-AkHN!;?|`o52gy+Wi1#`3DiV$B(H ze>>~9bqRA24CTwmZhZ)+Gq)qUBH#Sw`2Kf)HFwqRq&3<2h3u;TN`yxCKYmP7RNnX3 zKmXld2^#mHJ6Wm6A6&W$&KPFI38=2_Q9xPP?8QzZ&FUUKR?IEZ1D#9qfF-UiJ0xU6|F z1*DyEJT!)s8xSy*xBTT~Jw2I}K0Gs&#kt=L^TQT+^B^25G5js{p_S2`h@l4ee;gqV z^PM^K2LBb39h|Fnq0JRuTNe0NFc3JF&*MSS|wBQ{5VZf zPps3hGaKFGP(=vQIca5^B#&ORhTl4Q$XoZwQ)!LB%#Up#sz6?t^I+2Z=K_(X^%yk*e-LCL{mBAB zhMjAo5$W|2eG`{}2t04MU_aByoM}K<;9!w*5hKO2ctFsaAo}HeeAC~Ho~6~(OW_{= z#3B`!(l%7XcUshjo7zqp(qO5gMk_%X>a7$@Gk^sHf|Rq{|f z$64bi`^zCn%p5%p;hjdN7kR zmvray+*~;v&YZf7Y@Ca;O(z(tKI>A%wbOo%xJaI)XtFj8VrZzR=UlU( z;2x?YH~H@1op}~&bmTH9TGAXYB1$#Qub(j7k&K0j@ZQIP4|zNH<2z~2bh{Iz;Vcb{ zR$w5RidF(Hg*cz-1k%-uxUPAPNcFmMEXQoa%imSgHN7WML(YR+wQ4)hfvW3LV!B5e>mX3blf&6b^WY73OY`5Sp!&1{m%x=^63 zgX-F(-A(oln5SQ=Cs>~4XERi#k@u-b1?r%VRz8~KUu|}Z69QLT?Gw+MDy2x^;=}OH zq?^50xt(MCLEp2tEw2U#!QOo?u|V~2)2Q@SPuM2AXOj)ne~b|`nWU5?bh9aalg0zw z3w!KIlBPAgQW-0A_=3*Pe3@$=i}bB-6qp!-^U6mltbb*d1OY{X3TKC=*lQ9+<;bZK zX>vf={#)TA5J#!r7VZii2Z-68P$E|jie?X~lw2HyZR4U02Q)49rVxv@G}G&iFE;r! z5B=NSah$ZnfBAAL1vo!m;&6OLaw3{iT?WE_UhGOOJN|_W6N4;TQ9^IH`2JMRa=Wgw zUx5R_tcJYhR)2|snC2isp}K!GjKNX;m;3i>6kB!a+LdDgdqox9M9ApSDvaug>+-V~ zhJw+;Td&>tVy+A@(2IL=MYh9Ctu@w9ppCh#i1ywUe}d6{dO=aox?Vnv*6zS%N2qH{ z3^D70VYVVJFSIP`WD6SdGO8cj&brIsq(|>mKy6h*#~ho3fj%X~Y8`OXHoHnlshg5v z4*moCZf~jU_Ah3fj@WraO@+#Ps$iRT*`My{lh@AwQdfrqs>3z^yLj9@o}Vo}L!ojw z^VJ~lf7x>&gI||W)AQ&*znz%sYh-*xwI6Z zSB6xbK`*s6Rp(aW)?TX?FR?mO&_YF>d)=Ug&&7OxgOG8oxlx0tD;cL@~^DDHPzOEW1vb2gll z7xN|&%*vO>^ZnGnu{p{NBt3uxC3u-(nOg@}cMm!ros}XOeN&8EF)meyOFdW{e;X#X z=rX?~%Z=&jEqkPG6Y9f9ZKhM%Gy5uSJ*#os0=HB!O`p*}YBFd`Bj3vcU~WbgSmdGwje*?&0xFD&A?i8l~iG+AN9j!M}RH z=0B|cn$yzC8)AkuKQF=#+`^R1bd4YeLmZugbYs4>9%DgNk2m6z@z~Zj$VUl?p*0pm_fWS1 zWq;;lazY^bQKsfs1HM>jg`t-Xr+5Of?b@)ezD^Rkhuy`Vr zMD^jc58JwDdAmw%(x+_?iZ_InHmRkh!jtNjbTi6=`PHA{BKg&y{Zw|yhp+ZW@0163 zHs##C2`$LIkQ?rHI*|B{>G3Nc5px(QE9!ZaycGLFC9al9(K1aOf7WTQkV%j;XS`)O z9Er|3K8brFvO<=#o2c^=4{xj3cyu5yKUE4`iWt1mH!l;lN3Y{IY6Annt4pgMdqL4I zsF#AeU46xMR=?r0ql35%Z1#&ZPR?JvHHU%Au~fUq(nV3CA&d7U?}#F$THHtpXf$V^ zSry(H*?`v$8M1b9f7=P{<8nKPhUAXQQ@LaEu^P7VF+KE?2eY{1X&OHK-Lj*zbK>j! z-={|*mPqpgA1Zy3$pKi8^-TL_LlLZqIKbM&JQ)poVJ|h2tKRWH6`1)ZIBk*)CTt3v%JN70hOwRrLDqoMd%5;FTaFJeV~JM5-;J(WuC@f>-(DhYfgI`ZJASx%XTdXm{bA89<^CKv3`cZhMORF-g# z@s*)W<+9M1#?)=qd3=nv6G@#b0#AL7;|PSC{WE&{MAuDdUxbo1a9`LpxH31Z0Djh& z7ga8hW49|0e_+J5{FBSwoi^9QbjkRcXsFAZdcKI2y}eVOHqxk}nHtN!gfl@k`z$L3 zfC8LisBT`~)p%TW8>HwZ7*vVVB8V^Mjg&{599mojXO{Eg0TBLk7{a^9k*#lfKUVNq zh0bcSUg_HA#dWdZS-bIoRc4T7T!3b9UKbG{K8xiUe__Mot~xR>)z%tS$naWcyb_61 zQL#IGBV6hgLE4hi=CiO?v)-_AD&!7JglHpq?n(t?i2zniCW$1>Y! zD|?v*fTop>VL#6A!i8Owa9~fPn*sL(UWA0mry(7#^Qttj?hdo(RvgOHR;?&^GMQG> zFxeHuoKhp1rx%>pfvK`-z<5J1TR60YLtc&+e{;UFmD!L{Nm!~UmIIvgP~*42$&z|~ z&u?6xnpWbNd4eC~Hkx0KR|^6G2YTafkzl|163$A#6P!wNO+%=l zf4kl1RP2G zO4br?nkq*3{KaoR{QAvd^d*(yi*nSx5uHq_xf(1hNmuZ4{{CbHdx#7Smw<)d?oK{J z;Tw5O%zh|!3xo!gBf>Mu?S}$&f(}uRe*{>_+3e}oqausk0h)`-myZc;o=Amf9mw? zh`ii;&8$9g1cA`OFS*-5 zpreMdxyr}09eH-#sS^D3K42QI5YXLW*l(_vVzWsqy_2+tS-E_`7xZ&eGTb~K*stK8 z%WUJ^s5UH$s*&_PLlc@y()@3ge>??;4`o`0iDFWcJKXLRe?$t1{mG(d6lYh6qw^@GUFo;Dqv;r!TbK-k9CP0eh%l1g=MyJKqxXG@VQCu3qAjIQKly>@lmn(lhZ zF_N{iZ}k((WDfI|XaQ0f{3@(5rdWiOY5-qP5wztRNFujF!tTute# z8@V}#^6{By*8tXva%}ZsdVGsKFU2>flF^+;5786uhg3RR|0@M~j!CWpR}%?n&h=!F zBcufR;sTdf*uZ1_fv5T6glH2nu|ei$m}UlmDxhqz3xyo^M)}(Rce$a3q4()6r7yNo^7)IUKcfyX}P36;FQEU z0nu)bGgq@wA@j*+@OU|09)KxxWvp!UhmV6KVZ*8JN5_a_Zby#Cc1Edw&YgaQ8(2wa zzzt(l!Wr7?gEScpr&|H^ex_6xVeZiC4JHUU@ZM%y8cFsMe|)*cGPtTWB}Zvo`+YxC z)zx|Csn(9UbFjbkZK%vkxwfh%a24yoxZ}3a(2dezcf5zYvt}jT-*CP8L_yv1Q;X2= zDF~v89Xr>|zCVm7W0{6iYjhwsa5s+DGIk%I>={Opyv!_c#HC6L05(JXHTovu9Fw`c zTJbDBpj|KOe{NsSl5k{F3WF<$Sar>L@+^KH>iU#=lL!YNO1(P50wlShwP8Qz8dH-F)&XBOOGJaT&>Q=%Zf4(5~bBe?%>z<5KLlv^$MC=^cnxWaY1W zHNG}Sb9uePJG#zTJ2YL(61?Fa(FvO%!-x>zdzmh5eLQ#!^uKa)pQG4}-Gzahd@F!~ zHI)VobXgWr=5{vPD=m!fO^}UY9>YG8lQAp#40!uE>Gz2c#xQeGy# z;BcN#eR_FeHEbIUE$Hd#!{5vGU~KHxYL-renpGm4iL-4!dg2*bbJOp3mB z-j&;AYgz^JI;hjsHz%cnsas#t7JDQJiiNtO3_hx?4ST$4E$8AM6P;lKaAa3T8e;$#cc@0l)qk`hIlpBou*Sr?1V%RlI^Am-U= zPjN&xXn7C3@567f;-C|yc;%{piXhK&?}!ATveT#;ZxHtM@)4y#;oL#8Seg4Uf0Dhq zZC!b%c3;z`QJp9J63Pc$_>~z>sqOuQxtnLN>-)L{Il046tZ-!6HpkwJjdk1oLw;h_ zr4J3EexmwY$|@?&z?Bg~EnaUl8@h)&2lW%HK#m zLaPXRT&?*nHV1m_&kv@$)JRX`f5dDTK?n4Pd3!o^UY7AVNfrT}%FZK%8E@+kh)!D~ zh!}TGSoLb>&(hTcXs;+CtbDk+hm2Udz0nDLf|&r_`+m7;BEotQ^74)REhiyKWMK)f z;Trf1#aZvfh+kI0a&_7S;ZKJ88es|L0FWcOM6-J44~?FO%PwBxkze>@YED0gFD zJF8$CBixPaa?r+D7x*DZ(7U%qEO+`=@;EeCzjZLNVy>ur!WAQv^^DGE`UO2Z^%xfh zbxn`AH-s`k-c7xbZ=DP9F`Y{qA26_E2(_7pPLr4!Vu^;wtFA4{1ve(5FQnOLN`U@E zc+$4afk;@*jK~`4jZwtce=FaHARhU&1pUbd9;U>M*(o}-)baGhj(TYPSMvU+S{DPt zOW8zo7|&J$=ad=du%yKXL@v||q(gq-FEI{1P#yt->6fRSpvQSASy=m|;(Jgg7}A*f z6~?^wtHSs^jq?3^z2Vw+7Whz(rJYEoEqYv=1Kr_WqDt?3Sq)VJe<1%Nv5^mHs-{ca zNTGYSowU{0&)qPIJQdBmEi&;=P|FWVt)pAbl+w|K$=U>3g{q4_;`bV@(so;%hS{q0 zrQf@2Ed1kU^9VW(sDkXyr;8P6%!#@Di+Q5yL|H%q)2SWluOwnWYG`*^%62m$_CA-1+ z=Q3U`do8CUnZrkOQg{&3*c>LlB3!?x)g==swJOq(;@VJQf1sB4odZ&g-j2L*v}Rd# z7dB|^jKP`A5Uo+^CM4;y6`3T&Qrihdm7};XkBZ&kNWiGV0vqaHQ;YG?OIc8!L^+qK zJ^~F23z6oyZa0=QUR5j&>@V~W4tcz$5nevk=B)Q|%VdjZK0iwfoG9fCc1xb`mP^6V zzAkNAy7bFhe-rwY-@rl5DXsp4Vx>_c*(;X9*eLz9PG!+tLk`}4aPVQp~vL9bB&Cjwbs|genpLJ zn2eX8e-_}NL2_M;u}=PX5fL$X-n=tM^?ShZ<~=cGN86hZ!pNK0>owi^;5gb#55%-x zsCfw9VEcMo`F0X zmZQHr6YIrj6;`Qt$03v%c5SWHinaQ~FP?AEAn{CIZh&uu3KZGchT3ngQU#bbd8gjyv&)NYg&K(LK^m%a3KyqxY7ywgF6H%`|K zf90hscyLYv&nSWTNOd&uN6nCj9NEz+>fbneciNgut$?IHPmW2QG&7rhGCTW7pl3*g zlOB0bh6AI!fCU#d?3KzTrPoj6#X6YmfmRo!bk%$Tl^ulx@Y)N57mggui6o*Wr^*VP zfP??y?-{P<=bLJ;6qc45yG=e%%{qI9f2zO(RJ{)6DymiDdG|Mva#OhR6REZ6PLWHl z@D7^z1@=LvA*#KMeW*EO20g^^?2OI5-h6!&N}@5beZ;e zPH7}CJLx__ODnGQr-Meh+uLjD?9K?X&ka(Sa!<@gO+AVcGPGG-&HAE{!_9=VJyDq4 zaID0cwrUzZd$Uv=_S3V@ySk59f10h^JRc0xMa2QRd6?wdd>tp1r^kL)chc-?;=43a zm?fiFK2d-~QMbG6vNP5Xfjd8B5#x{Z^zJDCpfO%v%dU1IP9jz1z=E)VK`qCYnW(|NC_9&J*UMuf$V@gtt{E9grF{CLE zoMp^Mm`w_`NiX|SeCXPmrec5)Wyy7+p^w&d{(SK4?=I}1(O9ypHYktuC06u`tjO7S z3dN&tf=v?JK`0r=ODO}Le>(!^lNOQT87F^Jv88GxpFAshsm8)0=98#c%EVdE1%fC= zjPr^Weos{QC=7xv)=S0uPmxT9wQ3g=!)(3!c9`&2hmAOASnk{!3pd_VD$f99xB??vAdUmbMwSv9pQcr|aq@(!t!m8I;KN^PxUqxh zS_d6mNm-R`meQI;=3b9)|EkS9Z9u^H47wE^W z^3%~Jekc8zsT%ae_@PgQDL&FyWm(E9-nBLkRuP8Tf5dIChF_i$WY_%Ht<<*mM&n$t z6#KGh)rs1+kas2d_T#0f!#9?)pQmt)3dB|qw-n>fk_5%Nez$@F@!hovjt*N%e?rAJ zPKH@Ol{T8bcRH02gx0LK1%U2_o<7;Lc-Rb%qcS9X(WX=x9WcIlu8z<~W>rghvcKwU ziS9olf9@37gzYzkmhAV-ledB}Dt9>__aR3bIStcddd$(k)$cpzGh|13#UXQsh*|75 zZRHQOw8>#pK3=Mw8HpQ4aIV25sXZyp3zdSFg3CD^{_fPrpu>fj_#3Cv}s9? zmi>ZSrEjcuc(~yH#`{W>At4!;i^9xN!Y3Yg95xASYTGG$rh)KwstYi)O>Tm`;>7W* ze`t4hjh@Y;&mn&X%;w^(#Iu)oo!a!c!M{r!0$Cfe0#$#+yK!RV=SHY{urbwl_X`665O5i^I{ zrp7C}Q4sJ_#&I)!`0M?Jlkr(@@viK&-#(4k{s<%DS(Z&-8n;od!xpJ$;$8U_-I0>or%9_Nb*V2m{w?8yy1iMgut>OH^&%hs_F;==)FHY0=0Pi(bD$!^dC&Vi# z&_nvt^lU*A&z3p}d*wnj!uW3g;kRUVSJll&>%MYtk+r6|uMihVe`mXIsX%RmILy&~ z&N=RLR+`)4O@EaoqG9ZxImvPYAUf*=^s3CLR$Vflo=C&e?w##brO+TN@=*z{nn*qfLO)hslruh9=GvgMv4>SHDK-2U-;IqOu$ zWRad_nnRD*F%^RSe}4D}%@0pWno0tcp%WM~3AR+bbK}&_ij3yvBrMMn*U#;?dP*}4DhGa=$j3n;36t^@v zJ8!qUp60G-gxPk?^IK!59UFl6n#ZwP3E*3Dm2I1DpiN&Ef5i29afh=>)oXLdlT6l#Qt6IK^#q zwDXcf8L|JTzgec$1FtJH1DS&fI^+Iz4;Aa8*ydOZ0Gl5@F?O!hS1wJ}0ENmzdqES( znB{KyY1%!he~P1gsMCk9u7hjfP^&^7sO2h}VJ%q|-)G&beZcc@&aHsl5+8o^ILPvg zRB%1B6lu~0MA~f1XLW>@jx@l-Sm5%ycjm~D(wUv~)~-Bx$GLJ3n>@Al2uBmz7H`+N z{~~JEPb1-A!aXe0_6lS}qicTO0jw$0Q9EI)kd#vXf2rn*k5=)DhYZJL_pn)%YOLG^ z;~V}F;iTM@){%EAt4*DS!ktDKnJolEzA=p$ThdXNP0o)iLW>rL=Zk@HD#Wb_#{yF0 zHSn9|0))$7>)TJL#zh@lV2xd({XuMzD(FB7l3@3UaVc3Ie{3uCYW( zmv4(ye^8Ff_0Z*uTc}ZE??tzMRoPdlUEL40l;e=X$)9gb#^H$~q^-vDkrYc+BY-M6 zx*A~R`>4zRy&=ah0W`+-SU7m>F&K0$YP&1u^3rH#8ziB(mFl68^i zTxzxBwH%EWJ~5BSAvkk#I`-4W5jv8$(W&4tf75k4hIuUAIYXLcG#wRSLdU+AEc*8Flb<8l!#jqOr? z>$)=_Io4-TAChKWrr*0U{es1Tk z>R~LE?wRD~{YA|b@TVSmUnDoL*0lhoe`v4_*O57OtLyo-o)6_c*t{_*eaU6N>lHq9 zDU|LIx79XsF})5{#;51OWtI!9lfTH0%=Y(kB#4=8mBXcaueda{C_B)wResG>u1S0~ zU#h_Y@8dQsC4+1ME8aZKOLbQck>-q9RHvNEc_dmvcQqZ-D*!3pVdLRMLBYGD6)uJnyq z6>uo3AqY_{W-`bfb_O&l+-uo&e`9;5BQqGF9M!WAUz64j`eYi99p#ZE@Z!Di#3>c6 zbR4d2nd5Hlltf}&3!Q6c>|0|U^gwDF-)26rhiNgGNjmfrJtG`BIRfh+&KHpv`_hy^ zk&7JsX?l+LLer$R!WVl>KX#q=Rpx?dy(O%0KicqVN$wtXP7n@M*z|#hf981Zv98jM zc}vvp{psoY;kTzjuQ;mmG}76f^w;HyGE#M;WVZ0W6co56JW#`fP*-*x>~r(D%%6?< z5b=dD=k)kZ$Tj&W_JOIr>U6FrAlH>0>_u$wXY2}2PPgFbwz-Fj&H4r_;@Gd`3 zzZj~@fHwT{__C(0MphOBUoa(<bdu_@VDDKlK1@Dw!l2Qs>Q=$J4&j&1=kCC z@2gEgGZ&L2Ts?6#^?*BE{zY}%Sbf=fTU%pP|1?m#1>flx!>#)crtIGDUTh7e5XTH2kClu4CUXUtKX5PEXFg_k)HOP7arD;}qU zFxgNosV7!#25p}M;V^7Gf4((}uZH!mqV@L@+qiBPDyd!5ImqsOCI{h+{h#Vd_Mqcb z5%EnF!M+!?P<|TAe^$p}OW=mv^}}EK^|l8r(Su{jHXY!M$!Orrp_il9n^vy+;72cg zZ3Jy6$|WZI*Xb~5)8+gMKXU*82upPqOOuUQMb=c`R7WQvookrG!$VdKa{l}us7wic zo!XJC{E4j$S1UF99t8mt)DnM}=jS^hhqTF>Yun)JNaHDZe`J3`AookXo_#vM?IDDaRR6 z5|tZN3P%D6#!T5el2r4RR3fC(Q-`wIx*{Yuapl1nkpYVXtvTUF3XO8tFjrpNdSnA# zL_j-rw56uYe~tK2FWOmZ7)=VX70bNK)?Xxg|`&ljzbcpGPilwfB|5T0KhB%SDux#8Y zYu?^%yQ*a#frR7{Up+%geO4@GdY;gnxE@K`1P;rxf3oc2DwKeUo#w_(?UHZC{BvA( zdMV551hJpExyxi)DINX|$|7@Hx9c}@JHkAsHD;;FzFAZesgwzt{q`tuA5@l9Sg0LW zSq!5j_XIsbm#6BQyXg50}jP({! znjrEY{&xR3_`q&Ibot?wC&2eA7{bF@Gs--GOjf`qd?+om#W{=AKW4`5Kd=6yJ$aM1ce+cZ`iG7UXfF^P}NjT8iMr3uor+$3* z)qGW?qbxCG@hd4)dYQ>AEUJKRDeTR+s<-Ukl|n{wX;d&({#3eV^rLR{0P)msY(rP~ z6rG6$IZ5eo-G)NeBS-u|i~(YG03pQaQa(T_8pp{p#w0;oryb_H7DJAV;npE{Tco+N zfBKbK?bOj0!H^Gn#JBd-0}B;8;Eg(nBWbFar4fq+HW^4Ykrt&x8WFfLa>?rcWX(Eg`LtECE15cFrI)Xe24*1I z+=eCe_>}Jk;GZdAiif$z>$);#f0b>Hp#iCQ74oC^eHhQAJKsWPOb}35n$#llh@QuTHWzwm*N&!Xe}8lEc4SmM zC{ohH1KN|&CaDTLv!r_*ING)3BP{byAw7J-t{`La1Ou~jT^@En>!)`FWU1!$TtP%Y zD2J1)2e>|;pTp##48G|q1NERuj>2JyH`EsI<&pcX!SvmGJ-c60< zYKL<7$cpf`%6%pL`ea9m+V_*)igIdzpC%M&2B(?yv3L-61|?ZctkarQ!)ZsQG*5&VaSwY&I;7TMPfk(j!`p5Eu_4~YP?*m z->v&@KF7Z48xmO`B$T~1dEqlI!GtiOHH1YAyrrP9Kjla)3sG9&Wn{l z{?p%xc+1SokkTneq;ovOxf0@4)_X66U#8n^c*kcikCCSG+QVrEZK&IoygZo>LtjvZ ziG4ok%W7&)YvZL;+#QAtqg3O~8Mgj(w4@t%?GpNMyxfUYe=)_TrJJPVY6sVl6Tj6U z$P?-~B~%FjSFbiQ=ON8&TO7|hKdVbCx!vop(ybJuqAu8sfuM97++HsVc(&gN_$EE%-%50;dHDT*nf)OXJc2bOk4Xs_8T6tEK zb3!==GQ|DxcOFpOo^7f*dSKy&^TPhJS(DqHv^Sw287M+%Z%TmQhUj z$?TOCh_+s68RON*PT2!mxzEaa#OH6}6?kvLG131vsfaQ)le_Eq3SnW|GlbYvr*!rv zv(5IwLuHjADziAdKNJRzI3w7kfu+uU9u7;s7zg*QH|I6ooaA-enl@djOC0! zXvWL13x5O&;CUj5M$ltS#MuVg1l73eX;^DXC91hmnS@eVlT~3-p#xNb=b-vh>!t*M zODHb`lfRt_s(*H3htxY_vj0w4pI2DXI&bOtb)}_54xYK9mecJ#r#Z4L`OYUYztw+T zC8jTNsavZLrU{s*SklaHF89cVTogh6^i!|65P!TSE#h&gZL7K7XvCOkru89~dCxB9 zmE=E6R&QwCrMgM_k(C-oSGyR0HeKr~a;zNgWDBW5ttjS^>BF=1 za`Y02C$3gN(yx_8Ww4w4C(8R8(2rTQSfw8Iw^G*xn zw~eBF*VwuXs{4?A>*ESZssf*9NSK%^Qh)T4+j833OUA@G=~s~9{0jV#sG?&dDPt0y z`-*8>*Smn|k?ncW$nFIqN|s9Hnz-Q8G=vA}jNZoe2#6yh(j8N385f1D@Q87nWmu-p z6c!?da+aaGmcuF^HN(~h!l8$pOXbpv*q?8!#5P?!FYuontO=9CRGX>i6g;?@OMk`# zd>Rgy7ct z)n~TstwWt~oVXduerd}QG4)#TL(+yTjn4W8A(!Il!&gV+wFeo+fd`;CX;IyaJG#%&f`Ez=ET?=aHOg>NY#7Z!G`QjA}fm9m#74zZdj+~f#9 zTq9q)OHoC52v49l%YUaAg@cGdm+Pa{@q41Oiq0K|nx8Se#N$tZ^_IsN<9YTxh;&

lQ$Txt=64TWE8`hRPVc6h(VQ-18kIy(w^j8j}vcZDon|d1A{zeLc+T&Mw**} z!Ytg&Bb3!^rSyvID^q5~`(Xk0>y8V5`VzKi9wwt~I6)lSMQM=D!c`SRT|Ccvv3HZ} zBAQ#E99YE!p^~5`({|JjfMposrCvmCq;k_GeA80gR^oQm`yLAi=}R=khGv~4gAI5| z>-Ylalc7#A7`87n9nuLWehQfNp_`-)sN#w$ku=;Gt!M3kMN+a!TENktE*sKLK%_eR z<9F;hWzp7c66eWG+rml%a6lutl>g)bz((qPZHv;L;G5AOYJ?LtQ1nPmfvU(jY5oWf zX9Gk;847*dHzy}_m#tqDIM{M0LkZn-sJ3V<`M3%uXd}HPkkU02a>V=nh3|6HC!G)r zDC>~v9;)Fzg*=Ofq9ge72$2x^1bwb34QapqCaTRVRgrLQ)I(;|Pu=jy! zlMG@<2f7$kYB3GE<1(fjOo?9!hQ|g;s_T`HrDOwMix+I0t$3 z-zjc!Pi`&Ay>z##P$!#Hqv~dJ@jr9VBOMT)m;j-rYH;cgQqnV*;dz8^T4jz@V418W zn?rpp&RqOyZW10+5uLLFY;;77=tOX%oRpE@UL~dvJ{)Gt|Mmai4owNF4j0nld-_t? zi9+?DgD0xkYl;c#2K53SR=<~JfOtpYNQ0Lyfo@xazMLG5TzHlN(2s3viVFybmhPTo zZ~W`7VaPB7bzIIXzAQjVYk#kO9ohGvkMVt~0kig<*6S#;TYih*Pth$E&Iy9>HleU8 z(mD_gVj}Y~S6*%Z53SyHy+7fuT?wy;+E3n_2Sv1N-<&C*3}hWf3XufKNTQj9IwOiB zLkIbn&hN%SQP*%Kd&ix;9hh(+DGEBrGMbBKTUAn`GfRMVU0XTr=&(3M>eWEv^~!?H zEt`7*P7E?J*%mJw(Jn_AzdU7WjoO$AYAH@ri7HIFa`%XhNeS0j-dmRFKEEu6d5B4c zFv(x#Vw4=KFvqA%E=(-h32eHi8iE8A#lRWDXDb5d{>25`C_(xV9#n4O&gTY4DEJk9 zmOyc2y<-jhc7&5nNrM%2P;tQMx?wrSOEI-y7Cs=U31f{ESLkDZfinQl(s?zec_i`IgJe`NlV3Os7OwNA<1^+EuW`7bCF=v#@iU6Go!Z2H;P1- zVtYGmDea_jf#%Xsy3T&;Dd!e6QbQ5EN1L$ij)2d*AJ+VZ(^S`m2yUNX)ognNnqxO| zM^fW*SN1|xlkA~Dgr|E}+R&Njt~ZSV0;>^z`sVMpz^jS18M9&f^ItdMwM!U1Wa~*v zGtn{G=Te{a_>91Kz8_bF>Foo;Q$h^j&%3|UrmV*xh%PAk2@Wrs4ekNal#mihClD5F zAf3t3D{L2~H&bZmi?snZ%tcMhqW*gD-=~Nix7`-id`9Sm&X5Nw0L|*WiE|P%Bv|jP zJ|#7+0kw049@%Bkamp0;VIW@`9aUk%pa(_(yHG^lW+?L=frTw-%;db$LPlV-swXHq znCUx0bY!(enH3=sc;izakptr-OTpj(v2n-KxviR#mXqv-HRgIYHlTj=p5SZd#W#uo zyF^~VZpzcyubMhef}y@3fJoy};{dj)ySP#^f!u`1y0-+yFob%81VU>xNvEpb=O~tHuHk3hmZv4q#w#~UB7oGPp=i*~1b*1#XKI-|TIXRJS zBJq#WV+4MSbdoM`bi5qa#>4a#feHprB&qJd|A%eUzCZiK>Q zD>!VO#r3ZTFk)M|a^;eHh%jZoi_w)9{HrLnoIONrdv50Z?3w0%o1v{5CPL^Wi+z9&w>?`vB zb*xBM<)Tfb+jCWi1gUOJg`(?Kw(PLSl48I*=UlD?yNl*ZOj#mr{r5GCR(T+h8mVoW zDg+tv`X2o*MPCJu5Kw~iBHB^h`hclt2_F9i#$O=){kE}a7=7BGT*b-U##M4QkIcEeVIAAvw_hc-oi zO}BAcZ$A-r8@5F2oP-*a*%nYm3$i-4X(s?v*s%l|p>&Bd;Ep|0E)#JAD`Vzd;BXNp zi+Y?2xyl}pGvU4%Iq`-zaLbzuf`wa2+IK>dwi&vi+F%lAqzaO)l~W{B)0u=luFBT` z>)-#W>=rjJ>h{4z==QV5XDh{O_F?;n24jc)?0Mw|WHIg(ReqllkQHpGmFU_O&R4h}X$ecBjSvV?F>*yQ{LK4Q2nxP93kDVFBH_X!uOb-pKp#lL=7{o`o zl`u3=V1+I{C>l^iDYQo2ilahRx%Oey+1wa^Fu+`kaKa|{Y@`pL)*GjIbc7-G%s}HfQS6s{?J`tDC#AiB&T=Rq&6>0;cFIRhZ8{ zkI4bLrT3vxn%rTU>lhqKlU}#~<&9eV=`gzD-LV)g96_b+aMQXVxKGjllQE2?_B<}r za+L5!zYV7ZcZg|}pkzWB6crs3JM%uGUL-mz6OR66Sy&kee--Vr64oD93h$h4xCD3t zHtwYowG?BzLiV35QZxt9H^WN`wlVsVA~d=u!rN`{LgCEHXq|KbwQ^Q+iU~t%K0XB} zGz1gm&3xx=M(zAbzfTB1*k75((P3-}jY}oa4%BMxJFb%hySNhaB@$FH1U>O8jH*!qn(( z5XJlLvsu{4o+tTx z#+{HTs3byCpvXQ5ZpaM<>R{735-h4;)M4k}w#YvCU~RqGMBhw} zLaJ{Tn(lAEz4e)TWWGk?DN-g!rV+Jo7#DqTWkZ2z$vq`RNF7p zFSb6k&4yYh8cMC3vN}*g6hy7JX={Sv{Z8DrCE11prZ(pSu1I&j21+W*4W48>{Hun^ zw~eJKRB=Q)gz&(`2zA13L5|3|mNDkDC}f4wwhts?xWmXi8Lu*Uosk$Ryy!NA4`CP) z{R1@r=cG?;*f3`v%KQiQ=8;f>f)<2xRCsG|JikyS5Ys1b1JTwP+L+=O@0`;WW<^#M zThg9p&oZ*p9a>6Smog#>#A%$*7q!W`JUc5+PKsWHjFFx7b9-0p8gHCk zQboxzt9l*iujR5@%J8$}1iLi#0yBpUMr{Y3g-_T!l(`^i07DNH2fr8k@KjVpUN%xb zjZN4@yd34I!f0TnG%0}M2^T=}eAY0;xG=QdEDXb;g^W4gwm1f~0ljU}ZxQXtDc@iu zNqGx&jiB3h;-F+zY~_xR6$?;(95q16tt=onwCkbCLI9X+NgHigicuQO@I~v=wshY2i6uv&E@k@}Zv zz6hk%-<7V2YF#p_OVy&T#0@Edl|ytiszletm^Yg?X|A%mM_Br6Q@Y$E4b6HsjTUj%5OxPS=|4}}j=ay@5dzdDKDaK3$#bn;3 zsD|=2xL@yYthF~>Tq&M(K6;>xe{#?6%2g5ToBFb>HR7r2n-G+=D#PXNozfIQiWF#s zHq;m_sZMcMY7rFEK!I^v>2YzsP%mRJihiuIts7vYc$dC;xbR- zM{S^5$JKjwk<~L6{pA*`aM;L2Y|CSG>5p#-lj%D=dvg_NcWvaNpLL(?uqkgw~5s3_EhLFs-~0JXD*_$rCI zG2RoP-4)A74vR`?H^amdu|UXkZH&6ZOjD>I_o2x3s z|26;J_m14dpr7}Pw)7c6vu@q?wA7R#XYQgynWtrkZi=z*_D~khRq1>s4)Ml+^dB2j z`8qxKTYHtUtegMG#<5$KZOxR;7k&1hny^kAnYXdLW%|*^Eqy8b>pV6y+G1NFVxOR*GSAZs=C=&QuS!6@ z3!?$ADbRI8)7;MQ)HXmm4mM{Z4c$CK*f3S3!Ue@VRFc9hPW%zQ)L6rY^9KWv57rao zW#InFm;|gpm0XmJZnR#SRC9N3L{090+|p1*Zn%?H7Fn1}pbctH+gTuxi>5Yfr$SXK z>cB^Egh`;wbbXt)lQQ-=&zrFR6PW5w$QWMUm&onKcz!d%u;bT#c+yJGOAf&2I6F8* zAP*y`v>LinNR5O&tW)5LjS60Tiw&feVNQQ?rZ>E#6yU0j55k;&)|~rq_*JgI!XYpd5a!;)`hldsnGaoqw6ocq|K>sOwUM z4cuH?k_w_zTBX&+H=W{v6d67{8CsR}^410jla7*8UAY-5nTsVa-Q?O9kneaaVS;N5lb!X*ivo?QE93I9p=V>fP6->tm94aL%h8(T*-$S40vc^_l^? zC9t6!ZsC<0gf~kU2U4J&TOz`llfKMd{7a23nOWjIlYyr_0#onl(BD7+dcDiL$&mFU zMRJG%RR()+rvc?;)d9!a?`<`<7ysv)1^HU67zbWXU8fwezFN(3Xn@eq|ioG77G6CjUm2C5%KGbZs zcaZJt1%w`kvl6b;Y8?i&x_y~o*impI?aAa6RYFmj(feJN>$-LX|H)&K5_#fFp%by# zNjN|%?XG>rAo3nv7efyKl@y6c?63~N1c@sC)@AbqAb2(^JIM%y%`#_1;uc-gE`0U@ z=N);{ZXB+2$<2@ane5VvyH_onN|9iYDpr}jRpdi0Hyq`0f;#Sog-k{VQ>M~;hl#@P zoGm%LJio02XYhU*2ex?u!z|=$K=rJ~0l%Al(q4Q67PiXyKv~2m4)MY?a6~^Z>#8`P zJ))~VelKEVNTJvZH4Gf4-&W_{%_|WeUf{>`WIiSeN1iKS7qM9d0BdVk_opImRC?AzwuOlycD-NRT)&*_3wO{p4 z>SzdXRuZ9_iQSnn-Z4sQBV9z5ceDwSp~lMFi07dyo8hWbo`}ivYk5tko@}B$VVsFd z)m3po)O1}LX>l@|#ez|^l5ay;{k)iHJ|>+N=@gR12;3KIr?E{a0()D8NYqD*{&>uK zur@%GDT%9-z&QGk4zXKrYIHurjVEOG=;*l^ogJ$(?yTGlq(J+qY?c)V#Iv=N-uvM@ zGq-&@`{mOo&!0Y)9jN*?C&p2|66_VwFNL8dmkO`?nYMkqq4I~?=PkVrXC~bfe?0Vn zU)I-9{?}mPq{a43Z-}Tm={_hWlS;_e@gg&{e3d}Amb|xb@o-UeTx2wx^y%}JP;!r^ z`Sg{!EA6b{n~|!nCK|k>#IkQHX43a00#uTDc*7_zWW&6P4GaLr>Q+3t_AuhM195OJ zwJ^2tk#<3HnoFQ#5gO7FCln_em4Ygj;4NyA(Ue6_hR~kQK0=9_nTF!;m#$h475ZT4 z$L`5n&cnQ_s}QpFr<){g8NptZmvA1YQF&Vh(Fva~@to{^Q7Z695A*Z8Vpvz-3+4c_ z1}M*JcaP*XV|R}WcJZ$Um61ev1lbJ`Hh;QaLaj^ttXnGuh9=LtWzbwr82{0a>6BiIp2xIu{U>J*zb`xJHZ5nubrnjhd+uoyhWaI`9D z!BeaPu;os^FinX`oeid!*)I!MKlyc8w0^~ZSG26m`(N=HC|;`BM@7$O##{SIOBgNEb$RT;(qC|$jg~1(-NseD$bT|lcp}HPy!nW{XUgx|;+GyP*6;!w$ zPj_I}C?r!Ni&W&DgvJ%K{Y#{+zZIyA%TPD!TT-dSxVEdZmHORC&51E0LpQ%-r4On6 zrYu5<#=opx({wKynHKWDBO;CcX09rw`QpFwR?Pg>ZMPv@JQkr4wbRiXWa~({fn?|k z%T=!!kOt~_DV3mih}kIb*vW8qKTh4}^-L>DLoBvm5|4#=i(yo=DgwNPRlQ`7_-+4b zSGf(!y*4qHRCl+oHo_{jHCmf{|8B~OH&S}{5!!$LLnc4*Xz+WZc&xU6)Xgz}(My3H z8wq53l~2_CLswPdj<6>G_3!`Ws{j0l8#hlM@TZs6?ft6uKmTEqsk1VTtAljr@12jJ zf8pJ_`x?vf;liJz4$1_xzbUFy_mV9c)0_*l(4^h96d(+EOA-)9xDx=;HjLtqbkh{@ zDj#cN(otw=7H6r^#n-V@>6JjH%7uooT#pZwne9O9tMUJqrlS=3SKd|Eq(Q+$$ot_> z`}}Zm!w}HhRyaFFBDKAGTKF**UZY@WnGFIPDF(Ky79;9#jID1T&( z;(fU4?HA)xne6T`B0(G$UL_-MQUj@ki`IXrzwM}ub+bpy29l-hPBtik`s8b~fc;$; z-D6QNFQBSg)}l|?WfrKA9MF`}g+fkBsM6pReN5LLWt?IzfY?&@BXwe)EX#HYQJnS? zdAz4HA2rrSjn%6g($Cp};SfFnlOc$Ptt+h0|K*=&P}%Xn^e_J*l``bS;#Vd@A=4(X z!kDo#d$vNU5yD=+Cze5z-pf&udi-T@HG%StIoq zvc32-Bfp=`6d`i)O_#ia+R*XYG>WvBXkpmr&8)hjgYCmZt$pDLG#f=Bh#aOr48Vj) zu{Z%4jml*>`=pN*?ePr0^QbLuo038{E~R3m*gBddrF*b^-?Q+in*brY(AyEywrGc5 zMk~sCM@d+)s{%t4nz(t|Dlia9TfD~W%uKUpnM!I+zQo7y!T=OM>+tzBxG9r)X(E!QO)!S;ZU zUA#e!f3J%=I4+eGQ%I;KJow-sx{@})j0qpbm_n4BM_A%eBrCd9$UCCJtSx4!oN>$W zmAJ5D%o><8%BX#lU2$=eD6Ac*{jcT*yKbn2xrp5C2b(cZC3zZJ7Nr^;>D(QK@bwbQ zcL2Yo#{+ixCIu%SN-p?ktLjg}En`a)*F9G-fv z_=+faFH$D}k0Fa2QNkyEecA&RAtagpK*OD2*is&NmIIQsVI2H?-*`D+T$j)*-QnX( z#299AUx_q3-Kjjiz)FLIgQyMdbQWjZO2;)#Jetr#o5BbaZ|K=XnkVUOnr`eY0jVY~ zZce%nJRkXYN!$HxrC%5yk0RtV84qDiAU;nv@E-AiXm%ve5K*-RUS)d2%9m^Ul>~Fk6Jp!0ZV2 zVhhBo8j@QeAS!Z$rspAE8S54*)FqV_3<7?EHwHmU&M=c;(L^0=X(~A?&Mk6&VTe+n zgepv7Wvy)UHzv7&O;rpS){PTSrYL6Vc)j*UiOZfa;9w-5Qed%kWS^(=R-xDxxuGP= zjxuXhkNjpuC#&BUS+<6%r+`p=PQc(0(ezHf4S9Y*!TGnA>L(qgcG!GQlbyC{IczHZu;IQU&QQ{yfZ$OVsZ|Y&6bCE@#T=y|K|t3d;#}SZ6NSNl=dH-j#dDQ*1{*dJU{tw9(~e@> z^h{1MNIE~c4S6t1R4!Tq0wT}Lh)B!8(X4%9%KVH~ zm1t5RS-aF4Us8nNX<(Ds#!lKk6xWajkB6mdex`Q?T~Q}0PJFf6VE-$q7Zt;8RcRvU zF0p-0-TM;gH5~_;bLaqftW{MCha(CLm)d8`oo4z)-Gyf&SR(o?@SVs-=6Bso7O=CgEPLEc+P^%s3$^cG(I_61ih4J+&G-|7uu0kCGWoJ%?cYqtiSvy z^S!MAkJR*SY0pO%WZDgda|DqxH`^0JgAlHAIrwYdl?@U}p;Ah*(MqmF4%4n@Zo5bA z!$SBOhfBU2(bY{r-_V}flI&4AUysldj54j2vCgrO910Kf%amMG)j0FCVV0ZKg>P3w zY(lHX<0JnmOjjJ(twP;(&QFK`^m{9y5?#6S_B$tlU{LvV_HiFuxEFt-u{31?7;7KO`g1^009!;HqJjS3gM(aYhVYRX141_;Mb9xYEZk^wK@;s3R_wfWSujm4pau3pB z<#DCoF^2fG8JLiR&BF_{LYG1=>}kWZ3fN1&5;=-85X%bOz5(x&`G;JXRs@hfCt4tt z0ztK75)~L@85%@ouC#9W=m6t`a^0THM={%DLJ``s)7duMgO)Q$qyF4|IcMrk{DLhD z#^P5=Gn;lyksU^TK(iLN)2*5_muuF-yH5J%SmZ_b&JZ83?)53&!&+l#H6ffVEBq1} zDM72KcOm3GJaPvpmgXRW2=MRqpXH5Wn1wxLwnC%(Kx;24c`$UTjk>Fs`QN#X@Av?P zGbQ0M<18$-NJDCsoI8VnlOlof8P$Y@Q%5LLA+#et1BQTQ8)>a1+Cm~zLA537F2^>9 zz;eYs%aeYeY#1lbYppUS{=-^A^YlSWGslm{CU~0K8^2!46Ce`;>am{A ze(l;#IaA&oum#r2)GVSXBIq5A17Z--o0%t18xwa?a{$bpoU{$gHbtMjDyXB3Vsmfe zyaiyHhqGEr=i~p#%Lay#nE~WxH-Db*$FVX;O)vrum#UAFN~>YZ4kxT_v=UdewW!mf zPx(Z3NuSPsr9&5CJ=F;L4cJJJLyeM5P7r#;$`nF@$W9?Iy7d5{!Nw%*L#{#qYyL~J zbd3j@Loj0Q*NEam-HBzEtuXc(oK zNo$`yZJSe#cfU*ny4XIki+@>&q*6$hI)m>dt&rN=FEFB%VQ5Ff6E4!TL_W@ZW4#id zvpI3E+GPjc9bg&+D6qNM=mF9bJ?qvRe!L_ieve+PxCNr%fT~)JBMc*IkDH1y!ouAU zm-?m0)-HM9&e^l^OZ!Eo|I;72sDAH1^6&opU%m6gcYpljzw-a?&$s>uug;u){mZ3& zr{AKjU6g<0r#|c8TYq@yZT+&QRe>^ZQZui~@M{pS13$yGF4`J{LM`p`%5d#`%I zqUrl)bJZ&fyVgTb|6qJQKNzpiCvCaHKiB^M&znkD>qkHRiGK9>@%P{R=_QZ9ckuC_ z{^aoE@4x@ohaP|T9o(dF&30|QTx=UI`WJ=sZpLn$Kk{LBhZim7zxLPf(;s%=b}s+M z8&jaE`RDFKD687%FByY`Z_v-Ye1m^kdULTVXz|=Ibo$E!`;8??*H5hQ+MW; zUuy&|$5Mg%7(8&7@5CR(I9~oM_xg52_2;Nf)I)|X`rU8#Z|eZ+8r4%CO@||F?qPo> z;_+P#>#w!$-+dVm-=*(xhfkXH0yE2;V#+3}a13<)FxQjml?_lF8v@C^!raKNc*i zjYAt?wY$6J%X@AdbBBhA`IB@&nQ6iqPD)sv!o~!>TTG9?$QCMIvAw#${SYyJ$6fLB zIB*h}P9CLN%3<(78S;lkT?+F6=vg0P$D1*(zeymu7{v<%_BaB&AYFv#c&<3t{18gM z4WXn?|6UIk@(@Sv-M(LkAka9$<2XDiS9B^7=FSc3e0l{Hiy<^x;Mejy4?*O2Ia`tB z&ls*`7GpI3I4LJR3;Z)PEoW?o|N8fT>YWc1=41yDA_!-^T|-%|u2l(s2qy1*Fe$U^ z!fzV});k?&4A)36gX!3It8P_uJqf|Uv8S@CSUz6yq}4 zUg>DMrN4f%8lqWA{Wpyk<;B*c`B|D~iy9TQ;o!Zr2>lRGzBTcra-ZN<2Zt&A;iSth zCe+&GA*jRTIOEX6eCZD{|1ih(!Gl!%4y;{0_h!1bL zB&?O-ZQJzCvH|5Wde#&5BN3joTGFGwEf+)W2u_Fu*r(-x{m=hz;pWDG(9PUQ>qAf< z7hI>N@enEA%}CKLm&LXZR5XF^b=;(rP5~(Ire#Qa(4t)mQl&2Sv5`p6Lj-wa5#(>i zq=<8Y9e*vlu%jSez|7t%bc1p;z5zb@A+|gi%!8&z$0da{pQnQgyqz|?Srd7vMIOmy z9yV+rzUEx|b;c6CecX`r=^?VbkyG>w?|S;73#AE2Aa!mnEKLN`^RY>p->e>GD0=7J zOuOo!URIT~iw|+-4MQR$qjsm$4{k7>s_0o}a=X27s^29&dEnf@L)3Ue@NcQ>F`#ux*Y_5Ul}#xe?o(GD->LJkG`;& z>9#fQR9MIJ8qCT)`6QQ#*y$D9;~316h($}7>ZS4KlO^=cRJCuEcCe@^*$!&zdX0TL zYs#yigU;D=;g>7dIB_Q3O5qRXNx-#V~3 zJM}*$*V6hkuB^MN&Mk5*eXD<-lxKQjM769oWnGF^3vg5dpD%>=xGRJqyB)}y+-6r9{v-y~G~~Wj<*v2bD_SN_#?u0!mehYutIOs8Cs|Hk-;YpN76x zg<n{mA=NCU8iz6M zp>suby=Z{q@TFANGb?dN3fyE+?P%KNQEtUnLa{3^hqhdC8T?{`oB7_TLVS@!0w})> z=+}&#F8(wViusYuT;B{YSvTfXl$e~Ho0hXb5}uVe&vJgLl_^wa&)}Ir_3jmmT-I;`rX)jhyxeL-g ztjhM~#>BV|L~SWzKMG3k>7$A;k-CqZt2>fnjb!3SFt#dy_T=JEPgYQdh>cs)qL0*< zD5k(cS4fU)gJ{_HLp!C`z9*LXc@b12(9$9adbuobRn_bk_|bVjYJX$>ZS-*nx4+50 zY*A=+fi^y>2K#N{jaf0bP9Wn0|KKostti|`EkMH<4Z8GTMp3diA;G;?ikHBJ&TF@k z5GxfA%;q;VBvt9Cm&Fh@W)msTJsSI{Z+u9jh{{?^C%i>VrxGey^U>Tga&S{si^UB{ zE{u6X^}RXokV=N_q%J*exaD#$xADsxe^l1W%qIoZO;T|w9=q<5?cNR&Mi zQbD;&UT?}aEz}(SOGPbQ#1Tt)I}LT|a<-N0`f_Q68E|RM0$$n&!uRCdK4%a~4JpP? zJ4i_Rkm99ZB6Q5Y99A@}z$eQiSZO7YZYv!ys{c+KTP;i;Y~uOa7Az*cJ4g=N<5M6Brmxc;~i92Ue< zCL|N#m=;`qje3(;(4eS#Tp~mjVC%Sf{=HP0OFjX0g=Pp+y@tX&!ME~lZ9MOxvhkUVMd;AX_ zDR`-;<SxXqkuGauK^3f3nXS+S9s0)SoUdYIzrPyc zxlKZ?a(whp*eyBHVaYs z7-}Oqp;~UeY$g2g>s+&EH4@HK$!$(WsB$iT7=G71Ih`-uNMz9)E1#<3clzg@)F)J& z5%PyBFb~;JY`)EAj zI@F3`o|Q7aMTBR9oawQtq|FNadz*KicxM<8?@Lq95V@I(qX<)rDa&NNp`MNVb;681 z=c>S(f!Ku2j)~0g5iIVihyxHh#56y^-Ba{o9^T3$0n7GXZ7an7%6e@=g7vVGSC!SS zve&#DpZs)X558m9AKyZqL?i_M16A3P@{9cUVbi^6nm_n}<_}+}Ok=sizy;n}yN%xk zUw!qP;zY0UtFONLvRS_O)AxS*~Oq1d6 zwci-q#y@D75F}|npW1R3Qd_`*u-vkMzNkc{9s8;+4JG;eVo|gjEonSG4(MXx ztj??e3}uMk(Yi4zMV=We?#Dj2En)bsp!vpscP*}YlwEgjs6Hu9bwrKCxh^f8OW z;haAW2#EdBE83*ZzKX!INg_&5hR7b{*M9qy{bV=CPO3j)z+Xt=K_G>GXOyAvup%nZ zdP)M=@L84^+b)^^D&T-|lYUNtXw# z?(Bfiq9@;#sC6h2jf(I{Av488!NN;H(@FkVZb*LU1i=H#Xo!AvxYw>4QGu8P;1rX0 zcpBy}PhF!$JKhl{t_ovE799}nL^sJsqYe;S@=*6o08FFe zeCSBXrqIH+VvtYKLmXNxO#fNZM0(S_mSTQ*dVM} z;f`A!>zPG42Yf`l6`h!If4`oDIVqIxi#2w&6XpgCz_~S(3)}+N;_b`Oj^#}Yo2h1T z$i^wUG**i@TW?tm&(J6E2cPj-=qfaei*EzUBw!rVC@1-V0IcIj$mj>QpS@LXFb6=3 z!$=l!slypthNz0DyF*#Tb|_CkUBp8WkW6+G4pxHgNhw%GKD#k7)~J5jOp6dn+!xy}(mAwu#ZazdAm^=P)wBp@i%>b$ zT*{k@ZGTRC<5#BG;@}+nSiHCz(slg-0sVr@DpxXf=7!m{9y>-%0I}?sWvQzV=dnyF zy3)93zIXR7ZLd|LGr%Lb8k;hIQ2ddV{B_|sF^bi+U2$qdPzf7wv*^}FFQXVa9Xr11 z6al|~*qR6N8+yqixKHI4t&VxfNrrofi9%@AAILirQP9C~_^b4?%!EIkeTWvUINVY* zo?E!{F_WOVQ%mRFD1JTsgTKQAy)%Duc!K74(r0n!_<BI~S&xJK@79}pqKZ1seuz=^pXcuiEw2BGh!1#Bm#$+h;{(NJ>w|#D)b7!9H#yd` zM++Z^@%#NAC}t*8HG7vE^1Y3V=rvF;c*bX^%2f#DP+BZ0`k|NUtj9eNI{pwWQU zVYu(z2+ne_1cuR2fX#N$W7POyny%jaJprHx?`&gUp+%>eVQ$z{11U-caI1DRIZ6r!h-Vq-=r#ZZnKQbP` z(*h6+?+=7MlS6+DiE->%y_xCE>g|(LIZq*D6*+g_LyiXB4gab3$OaA_`u{DY z5y!55oECqiE&as*fR6nJck!>1YH3fx+g%yPJ%uyT%*x-L-+jsz{~hk*#WzcUfOb!3 zzkK@S`O}*Se_s0pUE;NIgS|iX!7rD(Dh(~+@OzqbR2!t0kyyPrtUvo@;p!*9E}1$0 zu4rrS*_*O|{y4Sey3{}zz)v4d-~!kFHcSaY4w^z-?sDlm^x1)EMhX#C`&p^5@9U8b;BD)b=km()(A0nsC`T2Gx(+t6*B+2rW&O+`ySv~ zTA)WDzvl&xZC^ez8A*o39&B{=3N8e)xR?Qgz!IQZk&#Zb*>pJ6V&@>Z&J zgH*dd@ir81pM6voJp|@!Rz`euNqQ5dF4F+ar?yu7JQS6qOrb=A5M8zqeN?Oy$b&}X zg1+i#RRTBUDRu_SP=jWOa(Aq#hrKLv>v|E4TcbDgdzsv&-WuUzgt}n%XcXDQtGFQ% zCI}u{9kk-Y<~-Lv?7jH&P-tK$WT}3uuQg8%DXmop{1rHM`nu*fcYV05fL?U;^|5^?kf`QncDbnJ4 z9IP|`UHLE#W^_ct|JpA6+yDv37Sz-vi1Y=)dzVf{9KB#v%zo*%AXB{fwpsZ_XiiSr z6yxo$%iB6EAv$G+h$HClyGf^e9iJ=K_*z%cxee^!#lODN^9iX7qr6oarpWzXjwP;8 zbev0uCMMRO#Bu!zD>yRJ&-}Sww9Ep$0lua;`GfbrwR^QU@#mZhR(`i=W5{xDOS!Lk z0h`zHWy_{KIT=`C(>BP#oE!&_K8{zZvEPVHBzSd(7Vi0h6!WtZ zAoAJo$^x=0?dr+jc-K}-y2ty$fg_G^u$jcez%EtPi<2Yb9n2}WLs^S?7xI8NKNhdK zJ+B%s4h;bH_a>Q)`iO=;NUy}O#+Je)*-)Mu4XHYb+lXCB(;}2Y{RWzw0oyPkDg_k0 z20;Z^*Iyw7ouzW>H{JF2+hXWW%hmt-zhAxSq(|j9jyG_DV%-Uu2?}9(qLH3D#fSg^ zxVimAr8ZCtqBsP1>@Z_Hqm>%F;XYRJDT6?}i`dqhkKU3%jilpQ3&k~~pa47$yHC4R zX{SYijHU>Aot^B(*9U(=D_@X-&L&>tIUoFL9`fHIlf#<3+4nt!c#McT{nk zkD3J5{;nZbF2O@+&Zc29d%p_VQuJ($EXb?IcvwReiLtc%8tGfCm1=mFYEm`jqZl;dW6veWEC>ae8_G;g&2tDZiN`GwFw zqAmp-W|JZ};xb;l0O-#Os`G-tCp4i>Th2`N$}>s(3~XXaV5L1+u20AUw<8G)iQ!qG zwys@-;+aZPa22U!yL?)#hU-iA+q6lWOxTPOX5UVe$O;mF(nfKtYcRVEU;qxMN!emm zUfoxE&8p651nyd%;MvRuxIitnlDo>D_o-`a{4se-kVCyeOCoM=deRQm25#l zZY_O1;M!)4BJQSRvW(zZZ`D$e+se$FNC)eCI$iaK)t-)>2u9oFc4Is+ffdU!ROp4FgyqZveTRTA zZ|AgksS^0rP}$cyux}b_vm}06oFpA~bj!D8uZ762K>n-!WJ#eUce2iTyAh6eAJPD{ zDjomcZ<%c&P4LZ@$I$Q9fkzH?BnHBQMzh2^;PW-7)utH#Ej3BR;6oc)7lAJ-&YbU~ zrmF;C3Sj&YVj*>l7U5zS)hdpOx^mGjBqc<7sV#_S)TRPIQabYoFh5FBDK&h@_SYI_ zPn!}Ul9#`&(-zB@^0@z2%s3=0t|@)5UsWF$Z4A_BF({#de}}mRgf`EVH8j%rlhX@l znddRu3M=QfNp*0)|VziZ1$mOM^K?4mksW8?hqRl!s z@(zvPAckR&G;o$Du1t73r3CQ}Ax@HBPaDZB<@K&zAxzQL`4G5a+F;_=x`c>w;_e~^ z+KHATX)z92TxlxOK&9u&$8zO*dYoeOA7mm@8FOZd1Qzm$^FsbtH3aKwBobjm+If8( zi>gTr0ctv0j11qIp!Hy#S=c<0apNqM7}Cb=o^(yMa(y>8N&(0N`KuPfcN@y_7p>4_lLr^~j&kEE}TJ#F6Qa;GlJYQHFJ3Ym6+UB~{ zB9f?GxSCS1i63TU+tcZuS+pVaP1+gJ7Q93~l9Y1ZPx2lidQmu>WH=h~v98%}(n8wU z1;>w3kbKC|@0BYn^77--=yUdx#G^b;^r8)wS&O!mxz?!(k3&E~|7KotFH(`9BfiMaAZ9kYE=t(CJk<-MtcjrA%82% z9(8GJ#G+I3w{)0e5<0O4NgLQ2qa5|)5R9az2GJJJ7;~?1cZy!xZA&Jh=8`n48*hF* zI7n=H;*b+=nwI!!xj-2_zM^Y83OmQV_%;yu;QB6ied)BIYX*OQar4fbc34~nySVS6|U=%T^f8L>(MGNFqc-tUaBD zdw{~$35p^7p#Q_w&0PM`cV+FYMEm)9GfFJoB(3DnGN+uTQi>5Lo2+sq){Uqt&741f z-zc-J+iYFHL9#lk^+=_d#T5O-W9QU6|i!MT?^^uig^!W>n!-_=#qC1 zh%hx7?>_Wqy%#f!d-kTgpF<4=CR6Z`WywwJs#1O|a4O3p!y0@sUC; zMXG=(^xI>}iSCdMrm6mOn|zKR_=(>_K7@bamWd4cq0wKBsc_p9CzQAn;Bl$IUfN`&dM?27%Nc+mQEr2fVJU+3x z__lVIl?(UZTy5}<_!b$Nx20YQzcF55ziR^TYKxWZynA9yUpe1)Umbh^73B01NG;R; zSFVHzV_-$B<1@NRTWYZlwJo)RhG`f7(9g23&$u0Uiz@_jm%^KcWP#RgshEakgfV&h zAJMS+ z%D6JL=Sd4B&yq3Q^`d@Q%x8)jFccN*snYo1P_)iwY|2d_ zPPoBt-SrkDLogGHeF5!(QU_5L0>K21bD?u;N|SrD4HwSpJoCur2TGP~#JWR2v{P(gdFh!$(@xyKchji=q?t@R&e39$RgJVG_z=HGOUjo%qGJ8G z5QjG-pDVyvGDQ!w7lKG*`$)gV$DZW%3C_28(5~OeT1PC<&b0N z3p4o=8>JD|uG|T}Gy?q%NSdg+Tjw*(bn+7oN!jHZVR&Oda+cqbd=T8d#1dji-+i2E zQ#5(CX41m0{L&xa_%HonZnJ_RI%h&h44~hRqj920+&&7v<|#{VU}oUIOOA7V9CWh4 zh6;4XX4?+Z$Cgw{+8H+cc{Y~`DQ52Kk2nHoxPIja(iyXnLS z6ITvgNFb`i9X9WQ;&tdijv$Sr8Ol-8Oa(qxSrkhBaAkB&;o%Fm4oP&iKJV(d{KNmv_M9T-kd%7F7n zNsdEy?HCnBFh}aYE+h%X$E^tuPOjaM-UIu9`VlQx3v;Uat7Ne^-y%A&j@!Q zjL#Wlk)=JVk8%cYOlTHB(a@IAdXSJm&B$GhB^D|JUSRy0Nx_=9Xcxrn{LQhbLMc;i zjI6n!WC-wHSio$+@ zNFd4;=` zerX`N5umUvR4gS${uQP882=8vMKXAQpg4aSJ7iGCBJt!~(3&}XB0i>1!^rUWpsGA( zL?cg+5oZ+bgtFqxtA+&Ym+ueiyW4>R{yuV_y%UWD#}_jC1vMJm|_yWzx`%>wf9A3haFx|~u!z;hj$PN>kq6j7&nI=p4Wac;( zhAczy1A?@%##zmq`EqE>Rp`)9>a5MOZ_CGUC{x}u}pp_5*Y7q z_I*{h&`t}qImVd)6w64w<53))c&AeNxbWoH@llr6RIl^K$Uz5@&%_a9J z%r9jjjcT6C)-+=GO=pDDBBo442VXz>RE|P1a@W?R@IM)sj8NapnV)c>YqV-o1y&L0 zBw>Z^?dA!voQbx)8X=~?Sp_ttOtMkf<$a#&>P_Q+W;Ebp<8ClSyy4Q}9hzfZasK}0 zu=0CFW-o&n({PrnRMz7f!hsM90csk2Sos?bX{I)STVH!|ZbTqE@&Xi)-RR(WkI?G) z9vJH_?MM{)EY6C}wjzw`nSe<{A&R4F->$UJssr&VR8mBxk|aXYxHbed7Vzp|vRVv` zoAxCrE7q8NRxZ4zcN?7?9nOs5AmRwV9?)ZfYi-)j_GnK?5maAcz6e~ceE`Ke9_3!e zLc^{P6@x}8i1yaZF}9srxrgSdAd`r9fM_B#yii545@ggHA2}6BRY6R2_7Q#utY~Q$ zcOn+LB(X*qt1c)@I#!m5nm3WH2V7d^vPYARaBdsNp6etm=BCTKguN!9Eo!jBnoA)_ ziWjnMweW3#lA7`()3xb_Efb@eG`0Tn&$Cv9CjRmtfp#y@ipRwmtN+NpP{x0oDGs~h z`Q8ml%PdI1=sZ?N%E{9SHL5dJw23^2h?uWTw zPsY`Wur zQYf#+b+8flj|k0!<^U5IU)>pYSTp}fZFY#{7>92{+DB!)3k zW;C4&#RGI^(TcNWH6Z+@6Cn_Qm0I$fwJA@GaQ*qOg}EIR`wE%TsrvONU{u(%*PtXt z7BAdces#Sg?4PhB#+NHKewe+Qi%>+QW!<{k`QJUCN`U|gQAA-xwgUv9fJr#Vh+p3z zoh2z#qTcSpoFv>8YS=0+GlgYKb%gX0!Xl?-%TY-!(OkToNY1EnqtrmiWbT{kPsnYu z<|0sB%M_0KE%uo|XRm6;-S}^ODg3<(Tg~)i$JAaDe=|T_DwX|4FjkdR8WMi8w=^3-Mr@~ZD``Dhn3nNv0cyR~c{G4*0 z>tV2o+mP7aYP9;O)o|FvgDS6L@l>k(Wa=!C1q{LcXhYKttq|oUT)-;7H)*Gg;-Vq( z!eapVTsJ!DuE1F3Ju0P!o#?Ar@jfIX%VBzSSRPJx*EO(8n-Infu{~ zUbql|OIKh68p1_NpgzZT3K5QSBA`hdNQG#1LvDyEEmX1XW*tr=>NKXeO}tIE)8Am!>o*>WVx%2E>A z;)yJlD44v+K}!bdjFd$^S0_ug&@#8<)8H%9FQo!q9aW>~YQ0%)l-yC2Kaw32r1s{9 z5u7Kf<3UAxi3Nnc4~na*VJumn#x`0ev2mw=O~qX?X*#~QsjH6zpCbuOeNcc48q=q9=M5MGNcqn&qP4#d(jaIlAFDZ z8EbUhvereLEA0wHNR){@CL6&C02)Oaokj_o^@0@AH`^AanEfQ6{5TTeEqy$%*FuwS zz#;vVI9EBS;o;?z} z7rKyi8251kB#cuvpVtDqWI&7`SZg&5+RXlF3hxOO2}V!(j6|koxv=ABgabwLr)No5 z%8E?V$&V<>D$<0GN=1h%Q=uIp!!#)@%&fu)+J~DVOrwX8pYlRnh-sZ!@#~%>1s@d= zmpEo6zj7e;#O?C0jdI;j8 ziq&Xpvov_jpAP>syVTAN+ihEJ^le()rQAq(UsNRX@B0kLWbg5SM=AINgI|t39&zlA zG<)P(D-vi5;m{%N-($;~WHAV=B?J+ObrtY!CU_)(prG9-%vpxTBipnYcMv;u&9FLb zGgucGv2um`5o_27gjo}@fPiy+3!;oG%G@cMaY7kAvoejWd4M@ZV11%F<9D7)MfnxK z_?LeCmH_!rd8ses_Vc%f6yN%`~{5BF}HWn0^0`<_E73w|*O( zr7&wDts9gJWd~JGR6CSuYdQ-zEULW;Cf(i&FpblaQxR<|`CA|@0cq+-5Q3i16zCAf zAw%yW7Yy~DI}lHe(l5bo|P*B&aj(2 zo^zRUK$@g>g56JMB(@yUtbu&p4HZXC7gdqaOozD(i14B3FGEqWD?hhqkPSGi*CUs( z=Vdf2p%XpzR;FpC!?Uuuq%U_mX|sYb1ps6d{qH4MeGd;$dKuLET&_hKfOMEcZ0o`f zpH*n;IFf9Qlcr3NGeSy9rdZjciU_${9P!2z4~Z4^)^(I)U6YqPU&nken#hU{Fi9n; zZa3?q_NS`Q8N+N<_{kX2vxG=Wz?(i^(dcjK4U4z0Q9Yp54Ky}ySwuFE8IN4n)8Sc? z_$`qHr-2;hAd3Ir_&d2NyCTZ`1Rhua=H<{rhq{nZG(hlBHCI(4gnn(_Gs)Yj^9lE> zD3FPCBgv$Z%&2lay&;o{a_!TsT>CKvSXI z0+Yk!<6YtSRcaRn`qn*?51pA!5DEu`u2NJ45X{4)Z-fu|l? zFc4TGQv@DJ6G~uK6hKX}d?;!dE5LL_jMqw)P)Nsoi4*Ap>$N7Lt>tDr@HzB$QHX2r ziAj0k#yO)*C^BCSa0ZuOz{hS`GTc`k1wyY>K{lH;$!=pc;HumfONn`}z&5L$H3P<{ zT|8_hzM0xLLeDHPloa2tICRttT{Va_1h9#mtah_6Wysxtf^r^r-cr`0m4bPLDSXtX zBLKmf{oH5vC7dDwInOIM_@DU2@^n-7y_G9MQFL6dK$^;;4e&ZrK(J1R7Jo%V8M4Wu zq0BO7U=L(#rPu>K7`oz=5tmG_fZ?SI$8)}qbFeq5a_C$&M=pV61;Jdo2_qJ#iArvQ znI}fx=hy4aq<>Kj6P9z%H_&PwXknZ*<(;z#A53&PQ_L{294660RIuwx)xwxPdVX5g zQa<~_pLE#OU%D+y-Tv{ud9rB0gX`@&8r$)7rGi9(00OO}Ey{6h8ikX`<>hF~5Nhrn z?(51WQZtyl^hb8+rgmQ$ESKC(z%}C{x{XlXYdZy^tKSdYhUu=T22>I9isEc30<_bP z3ZBeq?|o3QJasLB;?yFIcanB!Sx}EE*MdDuy26p}4qKAVpwwjOPILr6%QlVEpcon| zX3tAZefocVM*TqRm4PyvJ5!;-$_gGyOv+_B4>peRFFv29mTV9E{wfKl?wqwbywtxH z#@g2K9#MKp3sM}jepL(X#`j|)@!2U`VB4%osJ#m+8pl`O`#_X>NBzle#snP38T=9l zXnFl^T$AQr_onRQR37YPqWl)g<);PHxhVK4i5tcX3LOQXc-fRPN@MldbK$UfipSmO zr~ka&YdR2aw2H{fs1i;E(Xjs-kB%``b@{$H4S&e+NHx@y)U-USkYdW7kzPEVS*VM?~w1L1}#i zY(Xr^^Aw=R(FSdlUx#Y7D;bz-R)fe)R3v&(AcpPq5DK}SC*&{o z{r(12lEa5{&zRf7i3Ip=1LN227lyXr%(duLS~GQoR8Gm#P?twWi4rg6Vb6Cw0|8{ibX2%!!*$B#E# zYEbrl<9#N}6y5A4_BShD9muLmMlynM7W`Ns<@f*DO-UVOumC5w?3U%WDg%1D;vkKj ztNO6{VsWV-$0oakCj$MoMmi0h&A`HR6_eSEabZD;cdTpPHPx!n(tyoju!Z2zm9^;d z5Xo~ARY|2+7z5HmWo_hVS`e_pq}4=5lh8+^W5JLh( zr8sg_Mp6m)dlH8H7TH`=!fygfDnxSo=o1-1$s2`mC`U+pRM<9@Ee;ozLiza!F~1Nu z8ARSF&=c^^N_rB)#8d}(j8;81MeBEq_nWSd6SZ_p`pl@f?c!{aP;QtKh|Wo*b;-^V zIO^jB>xBPI!I#OD0$-{1Q^9Kmbk&HrDSm7asrFAYOnEx{$Wnp%IJp^}C!Rc%1?DO? zu0A~C7jEQi+`5H-1^LBN>Z~PjQdEjnllGe;3DX3}fx@pTy!_4wT3s=J6?M{0!8z)c zcRM~5Dl-M|q6tt0u1v|Aw}pRR8Z@-~AJ*uk`Nvu?3m`#1Sgw!LQ!;zf zoDp6*n(~u6xbfcWmGU4>qxPs)scH~b8S6BPH(Gd>$TVw;k+BUSq~w}%ssnj~?ARXH z1||YquDAH~9<05OschVdUvhbL+jRXCtHxJ>;i7GZE&i`*Mwhw;P*h5#0+EhlB^avd zhSxmNXD5EkE{6(xaxNK|Q-8B1*+nlrn@O2iXgH2h|u2N2c)rV3m=-yPWj(`EBQxH)W7O96=AG~wN;F1dbZSj-#u3eQUmJ+0O z^`V8P0uqKiyL_I|WTU*Iu#-<5I;V@G7b>%~Xzm^F01#q`;cciQrH?-k8*+Ktz@@Zq zds=E<<0JWPplct|fXN7a!gD4M7xha3cut$T0h$0$jN#it+-_ap6pg|&Cy!?}XJ|k|2#E8h4_by_>dF#=^A zo5B=B{1zl2KG*1y3UOC#78NGUFdqivPRdwC@SOM?w(?1=l!k?CUnyVR25IrdzfO62 zV+7VEV4jdW>Xa+DfWbM<1SGo!Z}4v{H$lmIB~0DHw={b0F1{tlw`#bH6&Ri5L(Ee` zI`ssdyo*0$7k<$U=dFs8gvvnY7R*2O91+WByiz(xxKUwR6qgm9kPuc;&O-_dK#izE ztq5(PHO=OBTAmh28`_%EgB#3eb8>jt8(vIu=TMl=4PeUEeO0q=@tPnFiHTfD^+B0u zthk=A?Umr3mqMq`mfw#s;X}~@C7Wq7LrA=jO~LE&*n_Cd)532Utn>+1YhkVOrJ*9g za*gt|9A;Qh*obXyrKa#1`7*Rfy~UMQb{8esvh&l%{&m=*JDahKD#z1?Y_5=JD&kd5 z=;XwOwy%M4x(7MwWg}JY(CByq;NLT9`?KLsXZPO^UzQnMH9Q_&OS4=KTPqi$R(ihW zY>aRuabjPl^+P#UNo9lY5Zo4Hu$%{!HOuX(GLZ^wk-f}(XwLB^U?4^G+J)gtgkA(+ z2c$Ez>bleXHIRHzwg4xm6RD@D=qjW*`KK zNmJ%)c~?Nm$|qeyJdpJ^2TP`0K$L^?7v2i*F`Ag&K!|~i^c>`qn6%wA+7+Gu>+p$D&bo)DHA1;yK6*1U}3frTv5h(?6Pn%&`810~Th?-c^9PH53b z#CZtN4rwe}!bPjH=$dwcPh~8@?!W#;lCp2{wZh=V*^|8UtLl$FzW?q^f;V zX*M7$q(A2}ko6r_K9WQx1UaI|bObotrBUcq;fcVBw1u5>aWo+gs1ql8GZ?ST)ZH76 zp4B87va`8xbuILnQhVTxQlLl6>QFhW&FI9Dtw{W8wmn1gYlJvxPUQUI^-x6!#)#X{ z^`Zjh?~i|tDHsLCD*s?LCV7n_Qg;zLdeaTKT$Lc1?7X!Jbj&E0j6ygd>{`lKNO3Sh zfx-nYD%Y_xa`ElT34^@fpU4CXC2+?BZZy9VxGjYy(b{j3#t+Xq72(h_bI#)-U$4mp zMGcWM(A$R5H0CD4_Ny&8k){;|MgIx8>@29Tkf}&pQ{V=UbzQ&UXc%^Lqd?=@ri~Yx z-7abYsR(aYSA|)=w#P0*H={&3+(5d4zHwPjNg#6;Rz|hpPb+k`m@HbnSk@Q_UkwVa z?Nza7(}Z*f1b8Zf{IVGCoLRe+xZwDS7F?dqFvKF+8~#bA*SdW_6vcQ$sEfFanjfyxOEeL(T*xAdq)NCq-3-QK=b!_}w zA#wr-BLW%{uQnfbf@QWzfF!{~YdDTHh)P4CSTj~#@(iGVIyXe>5Vb^tX8TxDJPrmJ zDSD_vO+;R897(6Vb~3jSTc*aiJ{~vVP?M;nut=5F*0M2}@Q#?Y2~ew0dOSv3n-MO? zOakInb-+Y1UZ65tnt76MC5g2WQ_Om&-Ty$aeb-E=L9@OGTn9)I(0~Tb9;Z3ZwygkS z+2=y1P%5jzDAt8mfTO_XCLlR5)znbuR3CuMrx6KFG*50JmFD;-o6a!%q3WR0y$2dA zab_}C1ej`da861Unq0dc1j-f|C*m}C@}`XlTnJ0Kcrn<>lw;q>aYipH+ZS@M^Ziv0tRzZWh$=Y9%ss=}C!n=mpgk$UDbD?rUgG|V7Ukgf>;RzRu0 zOUcR90xYmGt5^_Fs$r#Uvs2$m}S#LxU8m$KO0vuV> zr9F0tx4(LOc!LP&idzCq9^#Kg(nJSm_H-2pG#q@$E5kEqeVZuvz&`q*NO&*~`vfBE zN<%c~+!G;@8vUM~x3hX!aZ2fcbDhq3MM?2uHA=);(=;k3n;V(DQ!AiB^~|~xq*Vg^ zmb34K&XiHnGH(_EZgey@BCJBv;|FG-^#&-5}oHgupDsW-~IEBq*@_MWYnduAE zq4P0M*L*ZejN4g)#7WsNB{=eT?VcF34-spE-k_|LyFuY|fnei4xQl;f*=i6WruiXO zvIMbj`?$!>QG56&>P#E^*&M5Mt8(dxweRDj#aX#7(A4c-jr%-0_0MfULZ2yio){YP zCB6z;b@RAk!+YrfN(`QIIhV{oIL^Vemd_IZAg(nAp{sV$qDIrI?a5Mk0srYc&2vb7gt=rjzlEy3Pu%s7pHoCyj~- z%b!*Hr&KV)OuklJC;9+~l$3LBZ5voLln~X8tw5fTya=X9G)_aON!keO8V}QRPkV0| zcEm^Js-jyNJF0+AVgLS!R@8e}a5Wkrh~RUsdFZ2x(5Ctsr-KS9<&$96cRpX5hpf}5JXAKmfRCQ8^e9KR4j;IN7=Pv%Er|U=nIE&f%_AaXTee2 z($JAZ!w^9Ob05nz z>QIzsvXGhP?`x3s!V#!+itS2f?JaY=y1|Jm&bC#fjfU}{TP?@W@8@M(woYJzR@IKf zZpaoZQDSmBH)#%W8$?vX`$~Tve6sDo47JYFX4ROZ*|?X*z$0!P^LM9u5IU2h)y3L@ z2!|H0qM>>ls|D0u@&9&`mo8pPoT5&G5A^R3FZ5ih>*Z-H zgABRY)8^TiU_(YH%v42Y`=ZK47FYDQaL-3VjH|K}QR{5tx*_O&dl@KdiwMzfQ<@2D zM75j?wTZ5T7%%ItZ&o^-Y?@7k{O3C4Ie%(2-(@Yc8rceS=(}W%IwLJAqI-9QG6NFg zq5>vTWU%031B+}K$U+V&XiwN{4hb@PVw4Bb zKk3VyvD!)K7-PTy@rz^g?6MYq*_6l2=l9;3>mR6mCmvGBP9WUz#sT&9Zott)@Gr4v z9I?yZ{r9Jo9e+jgbTd}^!`DC(-M@t%Uw6N#^nd!R7uE0md;jjg|J6@_{KKFAmH(&T zs{Veg&YXVu%cXs`KP9dGEdRbw>y^Cohlk$gU+}`6H$xwuJ1NhKRebijKL?*Vxrk;f zpY-luANnYM?^Q2YP!!^-R}^-who1hy_Vki+{r{ggm3+)Q@4fpI{pj)I z@4xq>gOC5{$3H#z_)mWL{w0sUckuDQ{>eMZHQTlIa4|w{!V7O}j#Zz(02%Vz|UUAH*O<8@@q5^YSC|C5BX1MK33PZ=WR}_lnH_ zO7|6xhHRog+RNU3$M)49FKU_TaF(r-J{#`VE}QVfkIyLL|6iF zWb%8HBt@!`Hc2(r*}kj6)jhfy&qslk6qW-BcS;vb8gBx&TUW2?jO0diBaGogTy`{z z7U%;NSEbyBvqvimhrI-(YHrHU^F+tGl(y7EboS;q;WtTBWjwI2B&f_5p#Qp*xo#16B-}f5e!m9&4xfw zp!`}SNg^p7MuQ(Bv}4_!pWA>sRZl3+7hoHYfMaw+->C%y5@HS|*b)QKK|uB)Mtk$y z@Ism4#vPAf*?4Md(uwLLmk=I41Z(#&SR=J+TVA&;`Vgy)Zr*1~RNJMfKX11H>=x0+ z7L!~(VezWfOmX09<6011G~VW&Jp^WN?)ZafmE`{$r%WudKDI|hvvnP1nIDOlsSC1I zn?~h4%oShD=R5>vuL#UeOE`QOKNB?$2-;QXuBFoPrU3pBpB?WettNc{h+#EDKWs*+ z<|F@8Fur1m&)f)vKziatyYnGXd-MD8F-g_LjMY+MIY|_t9)hv^9*p@L3EiX;r|lsi zyNM(7iI&Bt{Cwo_vyR9n2({>vc4mT*^`XJVpRY>nAHuHJT>D=u&l5>=hcg1k zxVz~v#Cd?pdPu@!6XF{C9v>G}4z#pa4oN-)V{aOafho3GiG%@%Rl$Whe ziYuK^Bn~0!c9nPNf6T=`9`m#C^or}bQ8p8y1y}(Nv=AvDK7ZBk3wki8NXG8CV z9C9wps;t*_>5b{~v@QilLMHOX(E706Vq`u92^=_7qwNI@SO(-1o!p#TI)eVvf&qAM z8QfMB+|klao+VA>g!9He%K#wqahODlB9CXB#Xe0JEgVx@Jlj%ny{)NK>xS-2cI^zHy$Ty z-6+hx-W*4w>U*3iWabo|dk^5G0#XpFO7-bxdGU>94{CL4X4Y;2A+S=XClbkN!YG$* zxm9&}b9mksY<&n^+)lL4e^tyOc;%kx-jl7Tpkqt zj2lyt8Ak|ky|XtRl&o>jNK`2jgNk_I%Vw~t`%_2B(~Q2IZd>p%EJfzF>X%LC9y5RT z&WlZuvX8ivT7g3s-|osjRCcSV4V&n)chhP7JLfL0)Eit*l}@!4kfT_7h4(pp&115u zytQ1ZqB6i5OjsMb)uQG}O{n8(fL&(4xeN7rZY^Ok3D#C88eM(yt#{+4|J$D^wn0*H zN(SdzTLR85n`sM5DV8}Sq=+i9yqYsz)A(@SPM0NoL5$0IBv6nSr5$(k3cq(R#J!|r z8HB#T$K9a;2kBnQj;WStb{U)#Q(8&fL!A2=>Y$eqrFt^?HjyYUXNXP;JN{Z|QP3CSS=#>OP|(`zYDfSJ7=C_@uo7_>y_a*Mp>Q&yCq=UjGD zJUvOkK)H-{=8`c-oL71`6jPXK=LzWAFKs2<^MVQyzWFr#4Z^>GXE$|cuDuiCa5~$d zD(2lx+4@+;G-a@@2lNVhpWl^h>B8Xibi%mk4E&wffVbODm;i6So`#*Z`{hz%5?hj26z&_|> zUW9$j501S{51*WOpT7I_o%gatX|F5Av9BqY@ho31nx#RQY1`ef|7eC#cvV&Dn{!n&pY& zA3H$rV5(qF3GHZx|DV0LX>R1mvIYN2m^P0z11V+dJ7tw->P%Hh{Zic;NnQPBC38kN z08a%Xp!h(MTJ@XFSgmVzy(#NWXI7i_Y--cii!m#9ZRTIR`6YADz1KZFK#rri>Wm9+cQN*A{*BK&jyoaA}#bIgC7&rOc zuF%NI%UTor-W@H@|AaYb(di-k)>q-e2Zcwns&lspzgYGS#te~pXa$S@lHws%<;&+L z4??0|N{B=Ew$^yd7u&tcA0&Wbk1KneJwf5iWr*OW%BzD4iII>WOGb-B&xhgN^y7@a zq-cR=gdov+X0hhMJm0PnT#dgn_7cdo<~@eU;A2?-v66JFUp0K+ruF@UR)R;tlhfKk z>=N$5PN!CMmBbfCHKlftj16BsmX$@-r#XMoZ9^a_NzP0G8g3W}{61&x@u2HF_+2bw z=#I28YIV?;<=yCobJ@Mp9`z4R`w_Y>PrEEO({kEfS7kWIOo8$H_&^Y8T~^fA1wmh=x(-anaCSbLll zA5-r{&+bwrJ5M^7ed`2jbN*+}&tqHM9%oOngUSu3mhEnN{(_DC(1G2Ym8gI$zLe9n z$?zBSR?1gQNtTCpsuO$kNG&)^kE12b_5@ZO>e60LGIa}AL$YWTBBiA0ST=BiB17XA zM&L@z($Hq+n*0PmpKnG!A=$wfBwe zR?p5YafBk`I8sH{WCS{<7;vKF2>4gdO${E;pinK}&mIe+kjc!WXkHco;*k?E8V?OB zTBzLm6N|Gfu6&5d76+IrGWGrW=SF++FsN;WyGcFCM{({tO`t^2tyHY( zl2(@IFxx1Unx@PTQ)~ktO-8d0lWY&t^SEE~6hAR@&C>Q!hCr@P>KkA`rJ#kp9?D=n zohh!Jv8Mx3U@&dR8Mmd+z~tSEj3-{iG zZW|6`5fYu$O|kc2$fH2^7+0?yM?Q)I))Y$Jom)K@xX9a-7VhAS(wX+~%IfBp%zBAB zqF|9V0Z7up}+6#T<&|Njgf#0Fe-nnw$2hbPHxUrmyW0fQWOz=5&p2v_`3pzwPp4UYBtV zB5h^Lqk@vwXs-lu3ff4UgIcncmEmy%2+{~>A*ynez)m3`za^gV3(VOs7?pLgt%wkI zPRD=FlgVg(H%K^Uw&8;H6igjj8Q~_Z$El5b<`eznlcw&W+|xwFbGZU%+zc8qealpR zC?B~CNBB7V0^vPaC?SMe_TBlPyCe>K6gSfcc!`*m6_=_|LY#gvC}8H%7OilF#g&&G%&jKw=b^^2cJHk4HT z&p_fk3WzF!nc_u2!6~zu`R+XfdQIOk!yu|gO@tVZp>{`gvC8?&s>be#Tdn~^g+bBQcOPN76&1oUPIvxd*4P2H&!dVm?V#b*1xNp6S5Z>_lPos0|sgUI>~~HO;QbAZ;WA!&G2-F zxe6w=21GVkv6Q}MZEk}{dmt*D zV>6_x2F9y~5ksPCXQnAI#?@FDC!XPQm5Nv}6_BJ_dE+jaA$%Mi2M#C&;09i+Tzz>M zNQzDs;A+`dxx0u-ffb~yPYH3Gb5GV5QvTfm|`e!^fx=eJHpE zdKre(F}Wl22(!-JM1=03e!)Mej<=VQkT;M&>e&_)%2>NjvMZG!9ZV5BAyh31`#H(l z`V0&94;$#)X=9F-b?LO=6M4sUi;$WQoTEzK=1LBNxFG1hLB9unn*Lon+ppIj_@Q-H z(kEs<#o%WRDQ|;$UZ{?6{On=Lc0Y-fjzX{_mZfF8;-c$jHZ-QfYIGWnZFM zPJZH!G6*vo4InOB6a-u{QYjqQf(#c1B51b5GVu^9>)jwl=mHj%D~?!Hwxv=Ljo=m_ zpP7YX#^`CD*jVYPk~Y*{#&(=$JyUk=>K-v zSr%e{ZPZCjqBHQ)vDSJ7S3HKK^toBq;18Yn3I&r#US%7Igr3@eE zRBP46f#y>SOR>3#SvQk-o`BFzWtcq8A{`?iH{gFy4JGZFB6c&--Yyx668N-f*%l|- zj-E;q8P~7}aRVLeI?GEP_8tzb6agtklwXajfR#|J)_r$jsuD4pq@0*!$MY)ukIh*( zN6s%J(X4h%TLOjZO61o<@jcotW`Pf(w3RDGP_JClo4E7{M@50^f~%dyh%OPw(Nu-i zI2aW$X8J~yBk*cUqhA0Rz_1a$P7b$>aA|lIK4E5&E)?KH`WHPD-%(c0*TPB5Z~?6F z;TYE}wN616wb8fF`-LmGvd+d~0DrG>qLRfkj%;k(4)n*qQaezj?tbqN2$9hd4eH@L z3{xH>XK32FDa-6TGbc+P(g$n^DKbeb>%x#2sI2EG(Qe{N-A^e#<92ipx~Sh( z%r%VS&3YsF1tVDnJ;oW4kP=Jo@bFM88|X8iv{uan<2uME7i=%czTkPT8=-NPV@*0U zYHAK4pw;+d!e;_~M*f#r4z3(tOhw#c(K9vXqamLd7DLH^JU1I!sH6HC-5eKK@PQ0r zLH1FG7CPByotC+AJ{-1h5kg`uq^BpeA}6+7GBF^rW|^x|YN>?*5^~Ps3l{( zIOEf|N=K2OS6>+w%whBY=kjhxV?G*Zw@9v!w$z;txQ5YOp;cWh&;P`ww>unqd4XgP z%jQ%k5B>5UC4gdtjhlq`@_^6CR3X%#EFa~l0k!#60G34qET&s3SJ@~PW^cSi~ z?b^fca;YIxz}O&c3sUuxutxN%nOWI9{UNx(WSp`O@Zc~;07N@Yl9DNylLtjoY~F@T zM&K5+L#0E@0F|seQx!+97=AkoQ4z{ql{Y-{MJTwT+JXmhOM>bzs;R3c1HszGq6!Dt zzU5SmIDa)+@?-%55JrN?C|>2x(Wd(dl-wif;TApSH7rYfxQZ-EpcDOSEsSFD$I#CY z#h4+E!YN^YKV_*v7_dRg$;)wj2{&zN>$Q6O!+=jNpq@BCoj!@Q_a?sYJxJzYbK%M_ z$bu^%La^3ll+@ZT3v)Jixknocu{ybNoPFL@by;LFwZlI02&rAl{?!ez1Itg3`8Td) z0Iu*?L`7jB{6JD6g@HC(^zB+rb;3C-&!GAILtyZkpNUgkGQYu2^eh3R6DpbX3+_qH z{A+&vR1SgiZfm&&9fOvMYS+umS_8eK(X)pI?fk~rQeL1_NpzQ9+m-_|4D>{})2J29 zHmu6IKEzm7fx%h-JHPk%ci@3XE*5eu*V#LZfQzD95sT@9wx^`K4(-f%odu%i9ZhSc zmp;Z0TvTbFY-(Bb-lb`m?d}3!H({2!c`$+}M}hJh_PA)wf}C}OWCb-5b?=N#8)YUw zlJFx<8r;FBBQpt4*U$NdHg!}_t(T}TkBZLT!sg(5L@NyXyi#|Owrf);vSUpp#1k5{ z8qPihuBC2T{x;lM7=>QW&)8Wolir{Te5QdZw~`Uo^5sh-&{lCZ+~cQ0$(!9sWfyLu z5f&>;V%3{UJd5vcP--zK@8ZTUE-FNbB{X6e60PG1LW^!A0JNi98-yzv@0XjR(e9e4 zBqp*hdx)2Ocsi(x`1WNSU{8YJFh4()Q)P?r*2%`3-BFsFKbI-mSVd;ju)`Rl>`ieF zF)emrLPxJ7i$1qNsycc>s_eEnNpNHOCopFoh|v2??QEjsmxxK zUOlL-`xB!+lC}zTd_=`4nm2{KBvd3FJvx~!-YjE)3{)nNeqw$(Wr1i1WrQ_M1rj~B zR{G8XD$uL44r326$zZD>s37#fQOneJ7eEQ}9{-o}ENvG7=jB>C(*zqgj{%yTwtK77 zNy9W|>mYQ;!HUnExn;<6Cg~Z{1Zjk>#MXDmZ5r<0Z2QjtDa+6Q?1$lAIY~~(@G4cK z{meH%o^X_by43lL!pAkk;5ovhc?}mj)~Oqyt#YL%8Z;* z@H=@h90+z(`l@{Efn>fw<~h@&13Zujv}Y{dsILZiTA*{c$}Q%@LSN;QhWse~_DEYl zrjEXP-w5NK4I#*ywi4fyCx2g$6smnz_}kVMeRm z^?h+`IMBW^6nn|I0*pab`@qX?1aV4;UtP;Rww(hmdH6m}%%IDuV2V{8b3vvW_ZOft zLzBr|JeivY>(4xt`>4`C;l+UGej;l@7g%IpfR(|TD*LW8J6M{>nLxTvU0Duo?3fo)&X7lk(d z;AfUlky67ac?{W~#^k=W4JHt>%sCTv*C#REMFcLwnvJkgy1)be>W+3N6loo#xWpg8 zJ2dWu%S5uMaHEzvZ-n5xWe#)-*6V`)0hwSP%w|p9zB!RV_%6ePf-SW}pg?Yj6Lhm& z_GbaFYiJ9v7_W|_y;xGlB||a3mg92IjTL0#OP-*)%TS}JgW(ZGKi3s_olu4tczZfF zI6233JW^$N61A*z-glfp*+RxtT2|y`?4cjIk^(khh$rOrdB!RrHzXJ0C?L$7?0Ts$ zQAAkh6W-E=T>Hh`3wZxf8^`hNOx?^VjckWTVgg}|1@@sy$GoVmkOzlD@5$Z)2qa5^4_o~P}4LX&_{7Ik_Ol(y1s?IP62H@s}by? z?n*k}X;x#@f~uSn7Eb&>xduN>Ap+eb$fQvIfNCCQwoR^$F4kykEDm}TiamF@>0}xT z#$;lhL2tf@Ei>O3=33OQiskNaT+;dY9|G&3)W)@VZ%kj-pxcp@ zHGPi%jbBDNXY~>~AJtx=YJdU?#th_}3Ah~KnXMz8y z1ztgOVVRExNz&PJ4@^U;JO(lXo@@TwdR}Eu?eFXvIu{HfW|Vtwmwx&=-lZ}?rR;qH z?&K%*rS=+Z0z^wfwUpTtM`nFAirq52JEsgUP$>?8s)d9`(uH6-11@-ncU485QzBg@ z22~|ZhIvB+S|UTAdEYdwgp8uj0duh$mZ#YHjkjlIX->A!<#`!LeQwD7v5X!iEtIwT zD%643R}JXK!#i6EsoUJCs7Iqj7`}@E5otP$2Lt`k#Dn1AF3`oGg;AevPjj@0Pznvx z9oYf;6*gx#b3~Ws3blol@UuWQPSxQZu8~M&6gaU1MwULPA5hp*OJ0JSX?RV_wo$7( zP>ab7gcg6p)ViN70PYmMv)!N83$jWn^V<((GJjO@2(3R&PFyKPs%p^1%~&^A3ggz3 z)Y5y-GAVaUg&=$0lONI1jv&9Fznl7eJ|6jDaGA6_{p1gQ`;>AHoj6hWmk)lCcB{Rm zkX4xgcvMS*VfkU`4oI_AChq*zkBQtu9uP)HhCaYuO;2}U#9<`@VRl=i_u?8Q2c^mb zZMzGoYJO=4e(Sto4^2K>fl@0%a~_jMmQLr0+C z);lDn<4*!(yg@x;Pt}#^3`*QC5Q%HSIJec2A7@|o?q~8KW-nRrm-V8?b0t5QDmD(; zusWOPwjTqCmEFx&M}?i&4P(6|OY?1C>GU$mGI%R5BH@m+Z)+&oJuwu5)^1OnA#`zc zbEm>u+-7s^=UvnnE+JKhpC4rV6z~$&*IGXxgeUMQGqdwQSJ{F35{?%!*X$N_AkMOb z1y@HL^xi32G1&nvkZFoTs2RBGG&@+?2Fx3W$JyT)ip@*<RqWoax{ z>fgnom_T6YO&p1}lUOdqzmfh(>$V4a526IsIz-qx)YJvQ7OuOEk>kS|z{riOB9$S^ z9P4%>IkdbYpsYvw-?+{Ija7b8sH{MsCqLtHm!M+_Jig=EpGmR=DShGLTA|Y|IcOY= zE+ywcV=t0#ETBqvc#Vwlw&L*$kcPxlqz9%sah(vcnYQg|(eG~U1fgbv=jbi{Dw!H_ zf=XX%f#noOZffCl5^cV_TQqBB)Zj%k0E;d#v@$_0yZnbE}bBA^ime2BU zDH14a47833QsQZEPU1z9qykFc!%34q<$VgFd&YjL?bWJAWn_7itc3RX(ezlR)aBqC z|2PyiE1)j;X)u%+rFYvUDeL+%^OX1f!1Jsc9nW8r)9~ZppwX7PZo@*Nu3;H?3bBL% zHAR>qX-1;ekt_D1=rcx zR1vF+(KPi!A~8{*3#u=ol|+I5Q6AKi?6OmGgy*#&!MjYU+ihS$1BJq9poxysjVl2^ z{(J*?>rup#vFpm~wT~@0^nKQVTT`0Gnf^3YR6U*u`tPPGA#`x6Md96tEhWWR)ddnn zWu03YSEgDB+XcRJisrb|$+L(;#Lbh5SdnjQX8U?#$a|FtNIx&>x7m07($!t6RpY_O z7mG`2yoT<6D#QLP#a+wU*aZ!=$60%RdRG-a#&3jD9XczNrkI)NRFXX&2CemxM`V;z zyv&(Ga0FvoW#TthI9-0i9C>rJP9F!zAst5ajcj;Hrznp73SiFuuEG4QE$qgIzJLQ%qQMm z-n0$lT4Gq}N~Tj~i1byI2%!`!bWBEyEkdLooP`&?)}r@H3K|ha3B;$qFvGpYR%wV6 zSpN(2St--o_YbcCBx&C36~2@h0K=Hbv0652N-!X+yTA;mZra>o5?5t#RnS|CQ-O?Q zT4Ksh8E}C_pV2d5`lCU@Atpoa{n%cR_&Y)U#q$t`Kli8++-w^o*~X?9w+2**$N( zAjqZ1`?sdDNM0HMt1jazHhh@?upw=i-aOlKnY%*Ke}{{dSt@mj1?p6?%! z#jIe6LP-Fm2vKBTdDhe@vANT+FTLJz)^>pEDVb(QkFqp4v!;pq?HvteBX-k+HQwAl zTZ$^UoQ%cr1KxN3@3cP;)8Q(TM|(WYOzuT$k&!Ct z5(jJmq$30&Qw!;YQK%PBVdy@>eoC4=#Dz`|;y9UwD8um{!9i1gxBUbfdmjeTQjf+N0P3hiS~IHytT&oy!K4oS4w|VZQx)tn%AoqXwgpTDNG>9OwMLV5UQr&t|*p zDLbQ*`Q3%kDty*2$IfpN5`EyIMi?^Hmh4hji%L}Tg zW$mDv%0Z_$4B?j|eVTn!_h4P?_#1rFlFRxmGq||Znnh1i@RqL$C8SDLrJI(7nf(&c zkyLjYiyVmXwg?Z1F4RR`40{Slu29$y4f)VPM;#soGgF3s-k`xS5(w~Luxzxssd(s- z+*JgI=_|LYBe93NJX_SwavnY?WRanK8nGUV`cAt^8}!bCuvP7fjf%+X;vS_sm_7iF@zD6Riae`f%JiIV%9HY+Ky9+ux3*xD<(99#wGK0v?ASBXE zME%Bzg0pH)vv;B&P|N`&lGV&YtDn{wVjXh`SjJ(7WN?}7-xD@<)*ONv!9x@g8hG(>Khz#Mx<3kFM0h*4Ri}@`W07tn4NE|S9Ly#cFcGNVQMS2&3No$8-Qe$oDk$3ARNm1K>=Pi?`i@B>3@H;6f}*CP1QF^NmO` zV*rjSkq;fX94A(kL`0L7B5)^?NmHXRb9$|WW-m*GL{_eyDC|Zjapd=d;$wvPKs<*t zr@~F6##yA16eP)}?hezN(Y_YNz%~TgQT*GAlC&e^=f@}XO&-rao$@G+fX;;3m48|` z=YJ9wgCdq_f!QzWQwa?QOnB6A^Ux1Y!v;_vQidrG%m(}k$QNuGB7bIY@FNcL$s&R^ zm~>!)YRG{^FXX0_P+ed0%v1hnEj6$6NN`_)eba>|LnNnriAG`tjZ(KjQqbauP)cZH zWyHZ5D54INyi?lYgDQc%+`*)Xf@0J^_P?G2m{Aq&U9c+tEYn79e(Gz7{RkgKPXfMZ zUKgWVN4K3Vh2i~aR8mrElB}`J>eqGfsNR}%P_JaubRopWvEk7T5iH`J$d@9Ym{U4v zCHC@ICwu;%ovNw<9!LQ+YOTU0djX!250;2?1%S}m1oo%&@4UB;Hwh)Q6qVE0csd07 z7>*#|Y8dWi1V_a(>7#(B*NShcyWY%2;K4Gnu`GjSZi~Qx^{_;mMj0^uf|MJJb{AVU2Eq9=R@|ZWI&Z#j{ zxpu)C(qf{-5sC~V#LFtK91_lj=GCsV)B4`14{BxpE3$yDmGnJO<5)puMuT2F9cE+l zoOxZ1-l5|{(PxM)9{Thmj)gB39PvYYsW)MJk7 zB0TX9H2`6uhF9%GM}|@%A7HUT|I;E^7}jHJq|2aWUA{It5THus+^1o5l|jT*bhtJv ztOrGqi4a0eG!7ik8}Y2eg4sC13{Zs;)|Crl&)eCTTg`EYEqhYeKQ2u3<98jZ&SVFQ zU%m6-<9Fy^72Vgb-udB&Z|(F;YYJD*e)!>s@9X@7_dfpU;~yS;_`&-he*EFX_dfOC zryul1RYV{2?v5%5?a%(zhaZHOhPUdA*IJzK^{io^@iBYR$`ejq19^ixdi;5G`Zn8x ztGc&-A9g3D{zpIer2I$v(%=2+oligfZifwitf|s;iT@mdU4e|tiRSx zzkYXoJ@1Z}=Qp&N_~(rN`=l=AV;+3`$%p#Uay|L=eL$N0uJJkI=Y0O)9R`>sAO-K_GT zk95X1;T!ZbFE@GLI}{|Xy1onhEc&>&=~{*3xPIW?+jQXGyO=8mZ@A$ky*sSn=5^$a zaKDbUZok$@VqDNi0fTamr77QRd2ycZmzUP<`&ZD0dyNaY!co2A1#P2Y`j(4wjndqk zY&bU5_ZyDZ?dv%3_w}9|wD~sVu&?-x+3DUt-fu|$1Qpt<-|_a`(i(rY4ntYCXE{@E zU$sGBf0rG6Q96K3z7__bUpKZd4sU8Q@Y+xC_19$c^M3tx{noSL1Mia8g`2v39ZzJ@ zeVe-z!GA9MvfVf(c7xJ|y*+@pH>aP!TFAaV6B*7gQ$AIm`f-Amd%bxc@CL={x9F&S zNlvosTP!T6-5u)a3`u|ll_-a{L9i0NftwmQ-`?YO2^M;YShwr7*lY@w8tb8>tqXKh z=IO2i6X#8hlyC2&e*EMW1JiApQud&36`E?XVTBJ>LHmJH^FA)!U0nLD$7y-oGq+`g z_@r`Jk?n@3ziEs;!JNx?W?s6gy^l@beo?;$^z$MPX=t%CN&hL6T`>U!Lt&KM<~}st zxIFf;c}C&bJI4Z=?jj4`y#)FuSVD zTI4`@+)a)18zQ9cW7!)O%d)s6rnSf#S3O6ru`6c%Nz9GX+eb()bOO7u$_^e`~7jHImy1Q`H!AUchHB9CSKVFXTzB zUARjq$?s#&TNrx^t4i)M3w|GkpF4TX$s(a3-8uycq=GvSxQt^UvNd&f z`eyB{`+)ZbL3nfZyAm-iNw3Dbz)KjDscCESO( z+mDBmhPfcK#5a0DnSKp&jw;j5A$ql!lgg<9Vxu__rnjLQn{J)P{Z&1{V`PAt^s1=Dx z-G{5Yc(&hZtNWn!rUk9GnwgpO^%sa< z&*VV|I<~<%-$$<7ja-X*VOt%jdN-Sz1wHqz$Fa{KwRc39ENrn)Oaq{xBAgIy~4(2E9VpF|Y$-V0hR}zH=3!;V(3*eFM%r zX0MxMxLsaisi7d{XT0f}rMwR@Zy%y`$QCA0o9$fTFa~@dS#I4sHn^H5BK$ zWZKmC0p{DU?Be>v;Lz z=ySr2zTPdpQFQrcy6{g1UHAsl#Vgl342$KKk~gQ6v?cxpRt(!1hkgO=fi`;tj-lMp z260{`z2(tg`l-$4{ld5kq3a(#^%O-tBIOs;-HYrxS!8BgIB7*go&MdEk%lX@nJa*u znmV3hqfhW6KKR;=qV7D4j^g**=taKjYObH*cy(We_)XU?rm zu0~Vbb332V0-Bz$+rPxrO}Pg6@!IZx>%O(N?zVUD%Y|)bup$6=K#0F=lx+4K;azD( zWop7p=4r9Wve3T8D>3*af+!qsa7VB2c=qRA*mz^RwVfDi*zB%@fov)VRRgldeS6ee zVd$vnhs?04bez)zwFr|>Z+vv!Zrk>jvRnDC>$gp15s{w1STR$ccPpv~&b}mKTc;3k zNWFPjTHkMGIKq4?ySjf~_vHL&UxENE^zkdZWw{-AF;Ol{x()L$N(ZE@p1 zGnqfP504+RTQT{Z_i<5IdFFBo$fDg*nr4RmA>2ENkg(TsFjwI*=5{GzIz7uvPM+pe zkIk|PUPIoyi%Cr}vOnQxj-;zVhc46r(8I>^OZC}v6A>wo# z199L)CIEit#I#^S;R;I#1$}NS`YF6kl)k`)wVv9{9 zv}5!wb63`FP5;4G50V6vtUmt_oJHOaGe_To{FbI6T@MN0&Z{G=xTA+ za33&5-X@CCL*cQceA=JSiN4F6I=NzIkCoSGDGNr6wXp@|Zz%DYI=A32e%+(@r8R}C zX7B56srrRx%;l;KN$c>-uL}R-1HX~NpPabD`QQ57*H!ofq^R^I{4(Xk9j)Q;mLdD+ zUtDGbPU`wc+J`@Whd0q*xPq>M>u?nr_g}s9!w=uusou>GKm720oqzc8#~(lZ;lX&O*OUFJ5;hzd!SP7T)~)Wi7cKyB*$iYX{WtJZzP> zv%Q-hV%l8!^FD(Jj}`X=N0)OfU@B9dspAC?Z&)I%iNswi9FNA$==}&j*Q!f6_31l(uKOG7?0NElDuOhj#6cn|$4;tq6Q!LhD`WJUBK4lxiEl+u6`F$zDci4+US?0Yn1 z9bV&%OmWSxZ?^UnF?>;B$i5>J)5Fyib^o(nKZ`^BEwSU00w&r``~yFTxygI5L^re` zJ^h(#5%P29pwwv=Mc-0Njv-NPsB=uRC@F`Jh|@^^l4Vcc$09phfrkitmOjD#Odm&2 zeOa1n2rKAGl}Gcllg1VHQi(PnxkLx8fI`SjYf>A%;3$Z}vgKDdQr|RyVP6ZBp5tpl z*a7)DJ%)Z!5w>`mrby&b(zp<_(ieuCeZo+~4bS+(L#6%Q#jRtM9q4(K96JO~#tB)r zd|uT@IKDxSiaY&%Qy*!?Z5qFZ4$6=(b?^n@CpIOGQ^UY7QDo$xc(srp>A=t7HuCYc z`O;o}6eTkYY$8KWk@nN9w@rfphc|4kryUsu>;kZ@ZP>uHy`oe>{MBHbKV$y%OZOZ0 zD19*}9%P`9&o!uj4G&EVIN>51i3?5N>AoI4n)u03M7Ug*C})VNz9ly1$#9z3=F(kq zRxM(RHMSf(BP|}v>#Mr#5sMGMQA%y=(?~WIk2uzE-&~f$zs7iHw8%dR(e3C|jy{4idlpZ+42fL|Or2OT4GKHM_g%P&Uaf^OqDW zNLi+(Qx2cF^MctXeuv!^%X}{{JJ|V+tvjWypRPmpqJ0x|W*Xj@;`&nD;U*`W=sA+@ z*!k_n?mo?J9g@SoCIT$vS))hgA3a5?l%G<(Ko0*xgd^c$iQ*Bz--PH!<5xr@OnZC9 zEncw&E`(3lT>l|!xQ8o`fR<8+7PBA6U6Q=vHXsz<%Vqmmck2Dv+g^VBjo0164*aBF zk-&rF<3X#x<4EGfbi7V;fKTYv-5+ruil*BC-lCc8Ir;3un*giYqgncL%Mf8B4JCggI5Gxz1a>p&b~(>18ES$6c>wL9Dwn<3llBN zh}o}NE+xcy|0ER8QtX^p!MMEPVF)*JjT1`=Cwb#rv7MAErLmOcxx5O1W1HvrIQydW zjyQt(>mT6O z`aps^N;a5ydKO!|dsj9ZNHAIACdP({l0|m28I!$k4Q$)_qgC zYxD1|?=9vi=C+D7yiC&MM-h%(Sd2Qi2F+ietXydF1O%pFIIYKhG|bS7`lN0(T7K*? zASq#>q`T~Edl~m+UU{j%SS;tJb?sX%wt!DFlW|Wc%@Pk=OhHjY54=o%|B3+|m-VLhp{!6;+_~GDV6V3rY->2M4z-AAMqFwf@a`layvHYL%pPl)i$;KLuKiDM3 zY7261=1Q)~)83MJA$zJABd8ZLCQmV*zD39#g&?q*2~H5poqk4 zhqfE0R`~0H%anFDE~}!o5zt^eAj#-w4MjqCR$dLI2Qo;Sg27l>?fEV0W;v%XI?g;o z7oEYM`r2`kQIUPE50pz>lT@oXJ;Df}Y;i#%Mz5A{=%ncB z@JlR}V!^$~mV8k#+#DouDjn7tvM6-gazPu(XO01smQmjH;Q-KyWAk{1v?-9!N9rL;itNGiFV9#0W# zOS`k+@+t?xo@FG4X>XX?KF&A~rA4o&)5a!u0imb2aU6wBC>JyHU4iqEVGU#D(X3?1 zBlrLN=lw$j`gIt@x6t3LobaHRW@rb%mC0#!v-y@k|z<{GY z|5v2z(X4_L(%axnE(Z-?IzP7?$8uw4z^^)DiAKQVl&7!!sY9~9aMAwN0O|t#I_jXv z{9h3cmei$U7w!jClGTmjs@HC?J!?CeiHMQ#jt^+cO&F%7Wg0gc?+xvV!mij>pf6=O z14SKgCI4j9@WRQ0dKPLc<+P;h%jUo+E@I{6n2!o9Y9alsW`>4xH7nO{IvzKoO|*~R z7iDhQMdk^#G+nV>@kzkb!@0bN)X1m0LMKvB@NG`ldMH!k~Kz$_jd{3jB-N4h)i# z)>UL)BgzNV{oBc?eC_mnPjkgWa%9NsJ1mWF8#80drci&mI(9)ez3 zkci;Vq6!n&?jeroJaL8OtY~mLu9@ZT7aMcm1m2~!=37CB8tpaI{6l$(acoV`6OlOP zea8hQdn#-hNn^Z-<;*UY=YK->M%RLn6TmV40hOYDDU#IjpNS!rKOX3PEK}Z)jSw}dBezRKD~~t=7U!vtNGM_ z>8tMRuyxip%fsXM*@%2Oq7hi9NlL^q^NI_b-Z>9+G`;q5o%BvNF!NZRrRh|~#d?7m`2;wJ1AHmcqm5biYZ8&6DJew^13?Lh6 zJ3I1L1E^ySXB$AHrO(SYf;x-g84pl4T)hMn1F52L$lQRy`=)To9*i(me0cb*N=;zI zs&+WJXW_kM zw5G?|leuBCo0x`{_OH}<1|nKkSmz8b8&G$gTOpT`wB8L$&x?Bqe@8gO16f2%%>*<^vdqm=V))Wb+?tVi8CnMW{ z>~KWbb#{bg@ReddmP&H4sEg2!9s2ShOb6F;;86Bclmg}1(99(}6w_m`@nM@K@J=yy zEP)q@SJGX8NyUw5K8?Jrlko4HyQuurZW>0HBFeZ~DlK1qcp&-XGMCS>wOYhR<+&f# zLUhO~0y4{$yMYc+V!u2**Wh(-i*b$SbwW8vD-(JzUEJbpYX==!Ejfy&29}Ri1K?kI zke?s_REv{3`7_b5yfr%AfMEqpmkpd=lhlY&dy1@Xn7K-{6GsN$dYXuZ5U%UK+(2wP zbi+8xIC+kEdO)>GpyE4YLyyrgt^u}gT>f1#pdP$JRbWt?Q_>_gH9RM#aMhA&j5lIl zM$f*yPE)$hi+)!}7}PZly@aTn+1k*Iv<+9AqiB5%&dJ@ysQj_so*Wk!<5(79p4O-J zc!Hf!C*uXg8mz*ZSyc=DSF?$dHQHJp zE}d-H0ONx-?=7Q*ri{qvI7+7rIuO)P)GS0y1Rj0Obaztz(+tXk$A)xl$i!k$eO@<^ z@WS>r9&f?K)@_huO8KBXY;SlTWAmQsneaq%G_H|y4cP9G71B^J;*X6=Yx^%++>qK2 zp9+Ws?mq{-Nfj}%3uK4`IpF?xOyZF}bZ1$&gsdG!+4MhHdeH(=5`NXyAy@9|LTQZY zx2_~-CP)^AJ=taFT^Id6r8NNfjrn;K#b@MT=x+pAFlfqnXdVRn=qE)~t6GrByUjG` z6px+1=q|Fb>%bw0Puj8FIE`{^VyU1B!Q}-6_C0i33d^+jt2)?djIOW7CUown>|MC-tpMc?zHREhh`>kjDJ% z#5TU$$^qN|_#a<^qVW8Mh!0mh-)WdKy;0~ZA{*0TN(Zw|tidP;AY$QWXolw!Yvm2} z#W}`vDlVcGuux75Xrmq0)g6q!PQ^t9I!KIHtQ#go<85~|yd=F4Ooj7xR9uW%qx2Rb zj)n)t&i@HPB%%`7(xq=AbE&A z+PIURe`xHqmeWW%9zJ`y8<5Oo7`x03kA%hP2y3j-Q}D?Ni*S(jyd~Dr4-}&QB6JPf zT^AvKB~Gp z8qe3J%BBDW6ttDr>DPy&V=T{c_H6XrUcJk6dy8W0kWw=KtN|ta%g~mFFw7p=!cdoX z45K}9Q;eP(#tnH1OgtdQmaO8D@*tVAb&JU--<~>Q!V)4d9z6@?RCRdu{p6M?XWMXhetsGW-r z-kN527_m%i#zu9m*M$P^(5NXadc_QOGNc_u5Pj#eoeaNJB4^!N3Q3T#E4)WVay*|~ ztNsM}7ROUO9Qtx05sZSUvcLYJU+JvAR%z|t>Z|#mXi28kR_~n55ec#_t_><0@wEAEFCQ2Mk17t4Q z&R@Or@p~R#8@;8p(=NP&QNi>#6qx_&9rE#E(fntxp@<)T@_vLP9zH)QwDqx8tarn^ zeTkRVDmzPiTp~oaNe)fKV{lOOp`Den~rQp=?LypL`I9 zWe9px#g4jF*VsouZRAw?WMOCvS2DyQLv}}|Fw4%!ug5|H2>o0&g{UHn-9EQ{2;hCg zejF2F6CN?M$8q)@P|+nyWl&janfxo~lt<@y{S;NuOEkz%8)v1V4<1h1+jRlSwpFhRfyiIEluCcKz=w2lWOcynq;3j;%VZS* zz5r?28reezGO9&7XxX^YbxTY!PpD4DObYLFo{s`duWAl4E4?Shsj?MLA0CIfl57MeYsGTW%Wx;B3wc~mU0z&nxj;xsPeX=FH*QJ49&6~N1Cu?lyRER>RW}==WV=F`p*r!>_OsY&uN76Gre_5Jl<|G+J zly7>3_bUJ1_6y0snYj>Ck(uP*svEWtU(qxM^f(o!BU@IIp+{N*yR8~KFdjy1pYp?M zFKlQE#`0O~q}Zd8Ogl(>MvM5$mVGPCdpf0d<07lA+#EJ)$^Egrd4Fww{<0!>my%%W ziNrBMEK=p4 zB+6gOjveZ1O1L&6+7(8I_8NqAv}>*UIiD@KYNa!4(fsb1@y(V!1Eboj)yH?R z%Cx>GrF6bq?^#qsFWHjsbB}3V~VcJAv!Tg-M5X@00TD$j3Tmn_FVO=P$~ z+doast>EIijXN*!$iNGE6D)B5M!7}A;5t+v?&5~K2}Uh3mh*=X#H#_KCb;-YTp29n@U{HbL*{4L?sYVw6aG?7To;;2KIc)4%i@O8P+(TlA*~2jOs2yrmr;g?e*Z4gL)-IX9 zyCr#(Ckyf-20W4%`ok1f^Ub3GWzZ0=c)lbv`A>kO3-!CgDb_GoI=aW$3Ix_HGOC)> zo+rvxrk_Fg0~IzlOqk!&ezYNTwc?tOD3PxH?T{%&y^O{*QAZ=5D})5cy&v0Cz!*_dnw|eSRYaw+Ct^tyP>1xO(irtc5s#<)d2o-H z1g;%TKnl!?hN&Nc^E>P2{1QdHbs$31@%FXZ)3L@iLw+|8w>`QE{MAY4a?Uc=uu;XuK_L z!|s zEvszl<6jrgCha;j*nIn=rfnjtaMg(@(r!peA{8c)s23xu0Rg_GP{X2LSe~XvO@ud0 zfKR{Hq|tV4bv$t=*D{71u&xp`(yF%Kfgsx36~XQb8aKkr$(SOCzP$Enw*yG^C@k;J zU!-_)-hC-j_^|vk2QUN*g92A0Dt?fG3NBSL*n7gDH1m7R`qIJwN4Wl$MWL+=Y&5x4q2;&GFA$ve*z zrHbYf-PBZez~!-eD5rko2QlZ7SNw@mqNQD>#5~HBK650-2w9o6B6sk&)>KE|INQ+n z`YkgJvivtT^P=yR^_T&P9K3`g#FX;o+!}8CFz9hAz6~IpN32;FQ|xfG6H{f=9(S|K z%w&GXFdf{~b;7dUEJMF(GFGdIF}gDRqp6<;KmnB>>a~8pJ>P>lpC zCu6j3+c!W4Aq)-BQn3xbtsi5HxgCNt!p}Ch(3yGN!Mg33l4jN~cw{P7E+0-o+8h0v z3sM-fQ=yA|Zhz*6-ftS4Cqu72`1GR>54oox(@aq@elqUD`JH6bV*vd${W`sfoceSc zD6FY-{vSh)e-B#(F2$u~R+}koh*D&kqh+-`5-c#qAHdTA1g`r7^ zZ>7O7$>@lmPBPQBc7dr@8zsM*TgA2@adIa;5k|MW!Kw(vH&xjXL1F}OpzAq-632^) zPNOm2p+BW1TJ|Lio$%(YE16;(7$*uY`&o>sd4Pb+*DNgxfa1@u+yToCXZ`+{TeipX*;f=@q2c&&N@rPSlozawW z&4^>H=DgZEW-H?h?XFra5sKQ@w#Krnl6{-GF^|vm{?pRxmRi&mV;B?(Bw3>riyN z?f)^~g5r6q8M=^-B-#VR)JwoIDrPXui+oXWQjb=3=@rlrR_v`|9Z+Kzc#IM)+8FQ| z`nXD%8x`)OnOL1*HI-WkTFMW+dNqj{UOJS!!?;c~G&@RUG2m=inX0sV!ItnUl&JvV zzL$Z{#ggfO6usT5x(!FOo}Dmx=_9Z?+JNzrVe4IimTz8iFY>7Qpw@swI1Ynp&miX3 z=oDIj(bYV@59L(a`Cr#i>-e>+N_&2!NX)dVR)13K{ZR9L{%@JZUfnOCy%FQZPq`=t3yc?;1Ie+7ifDJXwAZn~{KA50ja;(^QvnvTq>19fM?zOKo^4pET&IdowT$=_ zq9ysoAi8n$d^y@FE}z@B^>PrZ3$8`z*v}8*^Nn2?2r8fWF%Ro$_9Wu{x}JgC=gZ^l zOENaJ?-P5u@8=eSfVOg`%AQ*G?)e!#mkj9P&u4TmQ+~b0o6?b9k`sJzC`41D;)2y? z!%(t5Mqo#2aO;8&4j)a$3|nf0@^;O8#OomI}ztl5wjtFu`+Kwow|t$uM9$8O9DVF=VP- z#)mkter}}h!hd^llPccKuAxLgLemF>;jag?fY)8qOXIhZ)Qi*F`hgEJnBX2yC zin39w9C(cgA2wOURoR|Z`MeR#NYu0Sl-9c8XiIg@cL@b}efMinm(U<`CDlWUd4qWA zv(4BrPdcIjd-Qv$0dOStng5g#)Lo<7MLeLYcb7hnn~o2-}3*^HM->sCCtCf38`IUU+CJ&p-mO7EoJgM;Th*kZC_+|3W5 zsrkw0X0a3%VbzdiXd8Ki8APtE*GHQu*XgKe2>5p9LEF$qa1A^M1`Qip8`@OTli)!m z+OQPuo;2}fK^}D|UPmcoTe`V)`8n6nz3_OlQdH{kl9Y^)UQ(~((RDoj27}}{E~-}Q z;YG@WV01PWzu%W$$}o#P0(K^h4bu<-rl*z~F_D`Y#SyJwx^9OvmoAfb2FMqDTQ4NU z!^DcnJx@Y(%v}Snv5{HkS(4W!>e+&6TjxVu7^PsKBmwEh%SA#Y{}qrvGJ@Zd*HI{8 z*3_(f!c7!%HM5vE2pF1?ZUs8NryN)@SZ))rZ|_w+qx} z9r)*ExY-njiKq~l^D|3_j{QY4q}pMyF(`(uO^Y5N)$YLv3FURIjL@I7_}3wiLWV=A zg*Y#~L96xIO*lvU(yECFXp{RTPO8)S=83Qt3Rb0zY4}`rl2JeLttBRgH(*D zuWHsF6S1ec+#k~8fw@ii>n;lwYTyLLFZ3p6s z>6BK=($R+aQ>61G5wZaGcshEbGEUNcYa{l`GcLF$&nzMt-f`y%fW@j#)z9_SUqBdD z;sLshtjan&5k4J1U6ESSvAEIw2b{4;+u&kUP$l<@1@HS?DvSw_WG| z3Y+!YuednLtO8twffZXd=}-?3KK=BALpn<<9I4XsaJEj=zwQ*<4g|I%xi>Xt1vmdh zjfzA4(j~QQzEQ*`$S12fi31gZ)*kk9(t@g?pc`8B!Uu95rpZqx$>{M50Ac|BYL)aB zK@GM!U>5hJ%eS1&nWYNwIM&vpU1&klnzRb;swuR@!)~*C zXzM855$&(Juv7_!uO~hBE-!;_YN5c3)?}S=JY+@x6t!__leSoP)Wuf<*7>}j^)0xw zxa(k1=m!RwR~j)16UAc?fE#c^v5ZH=$Y9Y*M067Kqz~%kWunsFWhIEXIO44sR6u-N zK3SkBmC&Q}KOPlK@V+r{9Ju585lXm&rbMM&*aEFWu4tEnqm5BonBsCVGRtE(@&WRp zuq-a(x7fu~2#yqvzCaOR_LMeS&%XeK*Yu64x;?Z$*e3WvCJ!%5NU6sjkdGbKpJL0f zm9iDZz!_+^{2p82;2F_jXP3!ssnVW~Squ?(Ff_`?9L4#|(w+F!Zs0!;%s!Z#0I$A+ z?(0TyQLNs}xE(y<E`xPzmRx#9WbsuPmMx@}p( z6G!+b03xRpRSLazfK2ijtd#+y0?n{y;TR&=dZXH|52rGtc#hDjO~Qj4FYA6J7nOU# zYISiWLu=Q*-Z1AD4j8U%EdN5OGNydpZfY{OWm@E`GV^7# znbUj|xGQ?fQ%>zyZY9Gb7sMgQ660P(ONO)3Vov?sf%Q6f$nlhPXf&I$Gqlp6m}dP@ z^VgUtFSB3QeQx@)OWi{G4&@k?tkcj`{q!<%xAVcLAAfQPG!m`M*x_o~R(!hZNS?oZ zEDOCM9sq+0sdYe;S3hCK{ds}2$Mfq#ij+18EK2!YTts@+$U zxiIYYbVC_aB^8y>V-nOBXbI3E7$|usfnEqS41;Jg)NkK^j59e-wijxvaI}TnuhY#QrwEP*nesu{-#fzB^n3n$i`lf4$9-xgLz3n@_@ zG@YgkJ0MSnCgA{=yb&SL32697M5ohfV=6kM@}qK>O>`bv>Qd6y=+H3c?qkQqF_O?T z8#ri=K|L$tKI9Jb4*f{33Mpw%5gh)g7BSHS+8WiSP$}bYee0GO~EyieoUhyg7(1iY}j0PAq|FZT98*sPWibbAeD!S!r67iLB ze|3-$2vrhc0xO{p$N&j0q_S>}z*Aa3kO{ZfILa^@+qX=jlGwn9viImjw4UXRFG=b( zFmxiD)g{Y#y!barCrgHo@QOv+D5B3Wz(e}eXtfP1cH{L{OaCp{oUsRTXR{RqELiuC?T$PUsUW@72OQC|`A? zc%F7Mu)LSwqLV;Az^Z;7=N@-}~kcXRr1Y%^Etax5O~{ zy*NzY6laxbkr#bws_fw5dmmAJf1Lg8@zIlGT8=+t4zfJVTd^bt$f10m_&f1b5}u-R9%* zWs3`$0b{)+ZxJ*co1d-|0Pmgw#Pvlr2He_t`gO7Aa)gqNQIobbXPyZLN92S~o9Vqu0#7qWBbB*`8C3TW=ML$>T9s9iIGXNV=o69>XbCv?vt64|vsyi_!FXz1?xIbY?i z7ji(wP|UR+WTPS?Dle{!NNPfh2xFm+O_iT>O) zXLf1DO)9=+tk0Et*!U?dvH9yi|JVOSGbNQDvkYzIU<;ka#&~iPJQ$x5rltpJ2F^vv`R{bp#`FbH8`?;3Lf^OzG@};bBb!0jRAO44O9Q*$ zhj<)I)fq|yO?ieK@f$w(KW2Ylx)oy+5{HG@P5-UUfJcT}%`@}6gz?~qVm8y>aluw2 zQCb%@Np)-(sDlc^JWN9n#OKnkfrKQ!H=E9k2$@#gqL+rB?MD4S3>FD@gz&S=REq>X zzK{a68$(1UzI4oS(?r;wtK5V9S|hX*LnT7{_6&?kyX-5|{ICD`Kh06nEqG8^ZNE}# zMe&J`OVZx@fBnzD{&Qm%d%AaJc#=A~S#m337_0G%BAx*RZAj9sOO zsXx7*Px$8dK^|j%T!(?BjoossWJv+?&;JP6Mxv04&UN+b3+Zdr3$?N418y_bk!AXFM9FnhePMcBCl3hNh2I zpB}-`%V6BHn&W-`x=Z|TR4zKY=G8|C9N&;H735o z>h8dp15sYP6_3C$P+&4%fp{Lg!EVJuX78cUorUlc7jZ9bIU$24J4 z)jyzBKIi!_Z;t?J!G%uCzpf)FXkg00G_D1)l-w$X;MIwrlfw{>ZeGb!!6`ZKLUVbi8|+eY&pU zj`<|hnDc*^ya9%q97H}R->glJ7W@~F0un3~p_Jl8_amN&$whKZ_)%KxcLHlSxrl*C zM#k1Tav4}J-GE+UGMpw(dC>fp#H`9*@+h!c%8sX}q8h#TGNScGQ;kBmyS}L4&<7i`P#`xhIFYR2_>7hCCX(*3CN2VzE3( zW{{UynR~2;9cEJh3 zh!x3^MS^9Vg~=>^lukz@^^dX*1LIiEZj_ul4mLs-wy1&H_7zO92}HyKLPOrd)hpKw z$H|yGx-G>cVQJUY7{NZ+WmK5!a?*lJ_ykgLVWvX|yf#vM_lGZKYx$Pl{vK-NO!$Cc z)kx;jMr0m~x{zlPGc+l421RcL+nF??1vd##(_YZhX2RCGF^o`EMdm1^n8etW&^{7Y zlF&F4PAr+DNkDpjvj85E?61f2NEd66Q@Ly|bRyGC3gT?)GeBjrwgTXjL0f>$Z3i&N zjo7Zc1WI@zWy{6jDNmUwvL0|^iPm%)gKH@v8=s6O;78ln#O%zJ{jUrX7_71xbrwe< zNYt zP%>;k7bkV`n*WaLMEZw&&rtl8?|u~HN;4I=qxQZgyaxb$P1e2B^1wP3xK5u=l*JaR z4f=~A8IzMcD9U9)F9p`qH(arI?R07|wbt%oNYmFc@a0O2DL;5RR@?5B`|$C=hbs*P z&69F}Qpv6OoOq&diAS75op?jDP5L@$n&Fo*;k6`)Q{%deO%C)co*TqxxoHYlh36g~f z#m;{C;fL?*{Db#C{^-*m9(?%0`yYP%;luYn^$$Zo=!>d|KIYx{LCQ~;Rbw$&YkCT( zs&1|fH`gU|m)n+aFBtSSMz8Q}H?C)QQtE&715e6-q`Ugvuip9eBiu2)a<-()FHX&s ztvLF-uXsIv$4$G7e@1V3X3oHD=zlkLr?wb=`^1*z*G4X)Udksu{AANdwfY1veZxuJ zb@k$^cUXU|n|}T7_F{pY_sy0%U(wh0%FeQg{6;JT&{CM3Kmm;d)a{bPJ%8y;u=H+55>^T|K1 zKF2V=|9mv%Z4!EK3w?7Z&P+#;XVsi}jdY^$) z@}vgu63321$!Ws@dUsg3&CAEn=NGqpzxG+qT7Q^{Vylg&=-QR!6Z4B($?so*)qd<8 z-sD>@&GcUJ*|636#XXy^HEs0`uj|Gaw(^`dR6AbvA$|G_JV2X6u!~Rb$~xBDKe)>Z zRrg-xbsycYwM?_)=k2t&dpbrud7uW521K-?40~D!9o(SMZTCz2 z_EzQdS1YJ*%cz8o1kb)Vtqy$nse=piKsPAZyCqNa+Sb#y9%b|d4{V-;5Yw4S#=X45 zi4qruqg(Xal)9;5;%#`mPhP3FxWxyo>c;ehJJ$f;iW*_vbQ5NtLYdF#Jd11V9~-C= zIr9s4bz6AEiK9Fbj}`c%HeuK}V~C`0BZ&5W9Qb+? zp(gL+y;~FS1^vk}ST&xJyASwoNx-M@V*~?1g?VT#k0lr1C^Y#(uMJfRWvyaVm zg5na5@n4ktx}5=?Jh`zzW5(JjUPuve2+q)W46wh>uil4v8y_v}@o7D#HgT3^@-dJntfHf>8kxbV>=zSmR z-I`EuOdGQ<`;;B9bW!7~UvjtVc1C<_q-zm%tCyjIIc9M4eU$flj}!VEo?cXrNhA#M z3qB}saxfa&wM)#ARymm;ib`tu5u3f6EsX!+KGwT6vECX_-{nl|_krGx4fF`YcfWr9NO#)T+L}e;|xi0K>#(E=B7ZgeS z0B_~BZhf1#v{qP@|zS#{m9{+*=-78O%ZGL!f^f}?a@8%s|x^bS^Oixkf%ChGX zd$Y1RTzG?RGM;EGHjd@S9Df4X}|am@=b$MFZx-^WboY*K(I_T1d8;&AGO zp@k>R1##R(G!RwHVU4{5e?zM_<73FHnqDYZ7)eXA!UD8v3W|Lkeru6Q!RinLS(i#@md;F}ze-SE+GON=t7ba?5P*+&ZFFvXtGK<jausqNDhJ-#Kj^=lj&A?@)VNfF!3f`&9aXjq|k5Dhg)u7$QM>RIP6 zn6&OoLtF0a`izXp`TsEky*UaLFfp~1FPRZuSVvp3DJ5BK+n;*owH%cR-r0Cxkeq5G zfEM$$GC^q**ss@278|3zVV9TRlOigg9`irE&eMGLeMzL&}g`e%b=pcZ}c6$C2 zq@Afe>mW#GS&{%nK)Sz?)qpt&pxwuQpiLWvNEB$VDo?#Ju_E720`kcCYh9I_CLI;{ zJ{}oros_{gWNz=iD|$Q-%5kVd<{8y#Q=ZW?V7V-%bAw5m!;Dib)VD{i&9BMO5(N$j zcLO!qcdt-T8FbaDzUO$_298uD=iEmITkR#Iwz)K$M+-_UlKIg8h2JaUy#bm zaxlTYC)2mB(>_nt9cTYgWpb6e%Hmwpi(ltWAC*+-pAO+`IqRLK{1!%-Ne= z<+j|xXw6PQBPdverI`(H+|m+Y7rJUjFP~US6s*!onrUa7U%m6-gIlpw*RO;UjlQp+ zS@jD=NtCN{eM#t-Ulsnv2mb5ApKMx1$NZKM%%U&RCFFG)-f|&i*hrB2@G64T4?q6+ zlTUtl@ZN_XeDvUxPe1hxm>UREANnudrP+LV{QmL7*Y*3^qd{*(s^23tK6>wS@&;&B zP_7tsH1T=rB{l-I-trV&8P9Ef;l6Y0Wm}W2dgZ#;+Ff&@Qtfr)Vh0>LTf9JlAG}ow z);3OAM~ZZjqaL*al>mCgL^Pt*NB5G<#Zb!N4d5FWEp&fy!PO)VI=p%geRz$6$&r~h z^y#irQPAe6UR1AKH7)Ha^Yzod&rNABQDd2S?M>Hsb?Z6#pr7e4!~Wr~9__9PcH*K& z9U9jny9;FMl-e}lRbJ~c*oK}pNF&Z)E*^e8X0v2jV!4_SI}J`FuTH;_a=>DfM`y7`7 zE2cp&_D& z2I+SSiB_fsn}=w8nJid^y759@L8uBcwko$0p#&(XPFY3N;CShSw&ZH;8bugU{Q3Xc zd$%4(t}|QkuMmEj$^omaD%rABLJN?~vMqP1TSwBkJ@X<2BR0t>1tVB-p)>VlpEqML zmGUHAo%krlK?4; zsiYcAd!CY#37AFNf^slN38jE%{zeqpk;wGu zgz%7jQ=C7ktcx9EzA3Z=P`F0LhN4^Tvi&knE3= z@dXwGHH(_=_pP6Nh%&+Xle}^#iVpe3LJ;V(Bc$QZ2*}#-qbSZmV1>LCQuBFJPVP%f zHxvpI_gq31Yg<5x@9lz(yfmwXtG%;qF`0~-B&D2{rNB%+R|qM!q1<82yieBsKlbHE zQ6fW0%5_Cy8G?av`zh6WFx}YEcZ3h|MkRA!5>6HP1*oM&8$%tmYrQahKCJkB&lwst zs%xtPXqlIZ(IwSJDv{e00@8sMC;*wtMD|9Y3W|_jImWBecN}{2&Zp(VnXID?z`i^F ziww@r{;Frh^|gz0E-Ae-nEInKUs8zw{btCsp^^lOvVm;DgsUo_ z%J>c#2W-IS-bH)qh<|Swi8Qj$+LX}2O|@}cY7oGul-LceaH9vhR4{0*6DK^C+lAt( zwPuglhl5!d>(*5^vd6K-{YhDI$eel}LI%)Oj?*`{Qo3@Rso@p|hgYo(F#1@FOB`en z2W~{tGv~ir>7(;ZN^@MDXOb;Z9|cUP9rOr@;kSY%ci3vdNYc6OeNZ~ozK+7RZ#UXb zQ9CK=4H|tV20&Sik*rF^UJ{1hb)5lxxzSg8yzlz_X-&7P&ZRt3(2|J;V7D$kPoeDl z^Cufuk5*k9ja^fEAvN6LBd&Sd^i7VUkcAA1jA!9OL@AX$y6qcRR#nDJTWC90>q~<4 zr*#Voz^F}WAYr}FYZDl*yEEy0Ct6Jknl>DXBXrrwXtQoAdWsvUopr1iNRzv37mK|2 zjGjQcTrbf*lj%1uUC)}f7-yIl02E~%4Odzfp>-%OXr?^*Ug-uMRh=@)Es!7pZO{wW zj0uiQ+G9@;F7aA?bd-q`*a67c4=tJdXct;-#A^+o?%2Oe<7J zl$ASZDi7$}xLgiRavg4-qQ)D>DzaL$%-qr9=@`f^(*o>>%$D)(VM?$7JVSQi!0%*WGwlmWZYPn)wF@YAuk6Faj|*O_zB@+1 zVHpqxa;KMrj&eR9I*Sm2{mN!Q$dTRn0M?q5MfwX0Nj3&u%$s)IP5DQ%@??bcm-eh* z>J;myv^Nk)t>aKbs$jFym?iRx9`9@-hEpve|H1>=Y(|b_s(@RhR?aYgWI*y#@-FGO z@~Fl(GM7mX$QP4o;+*&vtP{EzTCb>tXuQr#{>idA^uf`Vg-PosD=-TnN`{%u@0^6B z30=dP~Eo#wz!A}bD$P*g+#Xs*+-5?dD8s@8JE2U|fa zXZZji3QK?%UTt<2VFhm66cwY+sKv#7IccQk;n9wP4|G8Tdm^ck%uD%&bM$%X(jkvh z<3Qqae&QMe-GQ6}gHGMJ+=RI1muLyH4TnJV6_!BoPDdS)?b;Y`>Zpt5X=xq}0(-l5 z{_Hv=$fL^AYf=0&IFIwexQU(nsEe*GsjFMX`ktv=27qH&@=~4*2 z3bx-5uyQWd%H3keefRFS-Z+^wJT8HvuSz1TLycxl3dVqQuosdy*D+0xmZ~!o0Ra8M ztZDs;NxPyCC=S681u$%syHM~#Chq{=PipL3ZSh7V5Za-ll8IZRBv&m@MlP)HTbs^Y z_|6zsQgyQ6xw|mQso@c&i+NK~grXB2*?L_u8qz=C%;{dK=kH!!H+J@7v$cDn$qHP? zQ{OM&$W4rKq={C*x1&eJy|^$HgF3C>{IreJHU@b1n!ovY8lJ6F@=F0K>JvO^PJy+> z*?kKt&2i8xM0nRKP4~lL2@CC+JlW7?Q>A*V z59!eYHFdKpFZ4oz1}|<5q(j0a*cNhF?9*sVZc3O3@j6xk7c3FmB@bQ|u6QJdJz^~|^Om!r2EN}% z73$;I8r3ZNE?)va&)W0fSBSm&k8{xaW`)y2Ls?TWBIB9*$ePXpAQ90+ISvBXscMCz z3y~+_*?9@Td#5GoE^ykV+$R)*VUSlQYv|%#n}@>1U~Cf}zm*^0mJ6Lu;T2tj zb+bJ}35EPs(#iw?f&#cpRb>CLNu45<4%Yl-RjbVM>sAk$%dJIw1fH#gtkR z6{F1L!T9(vzUPMcZRWm3z|y4|z8uY6L<1LzHu0{0r+0hpQ5u_rbTu<|3pz%O&_7jc zQ%k|pJql1>>l+BeqYE80AbDUQr&gd>X5;rI57!9*WsL^gB(v9OyMnr@cVJzYR zW`)y*S8)_pnoP<>_DYVk`gYRvRh}-D`WnSNaWTNhhnnrS=T8>Z1;)|L2Zf5{LniXB z{7o3+RdlKiO|y};VFsgK3GHXYNy;nS!AoPj&T{T z>|cKIr711cNP;Vje;mLtt(#U;YF=mbP^H$(=#oi}0tRG(P|Mhf-Ion^Ze$9NwMK#2%tM+}_Uc}=Y&PT6Y3LkL?P{6H1L z6&Y@|jj02atbqZiGB347tTHgK$_>ebKB8?t`EJ$Z%gKCT%pJpN=}4Uaaso$%9oSBf zF%04ccO`e%0XE|IOE(AJvzYvt=|oa7dQGI){yp%=aHICSl#?!@ zSHC)&z>uwkZ~-(8+Us(0h$C+5%(s=;qvEll7U34$B|TU`yrAksYsDq-EFuLwMkzGZ z_s3eBjMARbaZEcRctQMAynvJH(I#uX&+|RYqRfSx)G6mRN(WtJG=@`&;Kw>$gH>Vm z#vDm-iK7oX%^tBG8J2EB{^A0M>H(KO3Im0bM%B4a7_s%S5Ke5Z^AE z4)Na|(=Q0P^jprVtP8DL@FIZwO>yL^gTU->wdw2N($1gONaavXW&{L2m`Sz_8%0S* ztwegF20P5M0_0f{8XXNdWS`-?wb>eF4v~2*nU0xTeGoR%aG#{d2(rpKKwv@+DO<~^*FY)N>0Kqf{09lftmsSLf1=X+|_;n z*hj--em~D8T_wbGA7L~!<$l->7p9iV``;~NPe%8nhxa;6T|CeIPgR|9Dn@iFJi-Ua zRFxFk*LUbVGI&5#H^~6kN(~tlUcs1dQ-BOz?A9)q7=B&RCES!2_bWCX_TqDgi32wr zZl1Gdu~DsqB=v)Cv0{J$t0lNiHsni*5RomF_2LkKk}K_{`o~fv|*Tw#y zY6>KvlTg;^RHOI?dD`<|BPJ6LT%Y}F{UH`tvFD^`@-AXH{(IE+L={_KfF$JC$S5e9 z;gV2P=$M9Vdez%2cyN0qrFZ=d3`P3CFV26vay-fsH&MBmm9w@5Z=3r%H0L>&ZHlf2 zt7Ts5@A$Askcsf3%!>?D=p|igTo+)Gi)~0{G;zboO9_Xi*pQs6HX2uEWpel_`VJj; zajgmv1P}CBDe3XJT_G(Bp4T5UP^a3P4}(gKG+1dv4t>PQ&Y*)%J@BFxwj!e(@=d)t zhWV|eZNe5)--QDxF>7~>dq<(3js&b|Pivl|fW~1htO6o0XZT@3KQcF{|8*4PYO@o1hp$-(__O zYnrh>S&VRyVhC5PDLCMKt_0DEg!r?P)@`9;@lexvG!z)|En8Cqq$o{Qd!_g(g*Xnu zb?Qo36g~OL7?3Gt@4De~s_2BwDK(jTM5bV(&wd-u)hMFo}Y{I|W)(eU@oG=I<$ak znVXt+y;Mr{gY6L73`?EU5O~g7YbFd=h-EBntH^0R#;EKO+8=3a2>}5nh|~z`nCP0{ zP0R)B9e-52i)+=dEnS8>r80LSzM=6q8urg3osa7yyv0pWDvKl zNC44AQyQh0SW_PpNcP=v(E}Znoqrv%vqyg#h?t^@nVoMi)}`M9H~RNWdGlh>?Wlo7 zx6ImasxMkG=V!8;cU`z!pL2dU6_7|~t_~3Gp_Puo6w0hQK?NU+){LduKkkQJJMZz{ z1I?)8smZvwV^m!8suayvZjc)tmq9bMR1N-sCkvr%phTc;T_S<@rc1;blxD<#L*|X{ zOP1`Kkl?TTo#ol|lWQv;I0E-$K>Qp_?O5owJpwxd4hXm4Tw)i_Y865upn(`iaA%^) z{ddu1=(^IG!ki}b_gMx|C#{&^=?I!(9%f}7n`HHqT9p*C+M~&R5e3C4ROjjcipEi9 zRxWO|LHLIoHC&-$=BXEn2=+1s_;FV9EFzR?Ql-?XMfpB!&wss~e;bR=}x?@8emZ zYD-=~`eXbmPw%P5Fw4O_jkf1aK|g;0mThY&gcQ|^VlX?{ZduE17A%-3XBz2kCjph)T|jUOZeGu%l3a*Wao zRj3&07is2dqKGYxP}QBTb$CGHuQf5i%aZG;Z--04)f&$x+|$_9t_v=aDm za#1y91TjsyK9zx4xabzf))kg%BP`b~z}dyz_b9hVa5!B1Jh9M~>*=qAf9Srnm%VxK z8}?AROnorE#{Y5u*ZA@m^HTk@pOHD3H6oY?(||HOa${}F%*%y!WJYv+JcjS)sX`g-f3)UC0Wr#x_FS0v1U*=&aTVIeZA3;?nr9QyP3D-aKFN-rbu zsjG@d&G1E81j>lN?fYg0tI2(fCRer`G&CI;!sS!PCC{4CUoN4?#P2RtuT0267q*GC98*l5+>CjC z6G=R3#Qj`T=ZVrR*I$zja*bNG47yipbzuKdbTbA+CET?trv;B{MtiaWZ2B1t4U(K< zXm3(U@?nN@s+MEN$|PXdEk=~l+pq}Z-IcJ|zi1?U7em3u^wMe36P(tN{XXL_ln#$) zbRU5=OXv2<`7bizP?V{1!O(i9ZPu_W%4j6OE2ZHO2lq9W#o)sGp>x;wx@FdW^_xHc zAyKz@a*L7{Q`0_~K4T(pKbJT!A1_l~oeD3b+rbFvlXRr_<)gk_e)aPr)up;Q*&EgK ziFb8VpGae;PTz&@F-~zNeB6f_Y`?58pksq=nJ*FROS5b~&je|oyiel6k&y&XDl?h- zT4Q=TtBUxM(qvanelzujV;n&MB(cgk<}&EU*Gd4taP=Xi53VTvy_^Qb0czrj&OS28 z%ALAV4NU7_N=|Y?h}1?I11<;vIviF>A1SS7J_Xao9crTmXLSQF_<@dbHSDN-ddd6i z$CR;q8NVmR-wSv`8v-`M)ZGlG5y4KB+c(g+%UxSQ1j-rlTGVh)TCi=K^%9MGCClak z*FNDqiGnjcX|b=4l)V=hST)7@6UOl!{;Yn?3-TltYuJ^u9@!+fS(Xa$`B30mBk2vq# zpu+;1k(Pkx2$BTh_zX~!qh#n~Vb)Yz29?xYhDWoU$qD6`u4Igx|9v6s%WhL9=TU41 zt?ke@PZIh* z(t3SsPr1c}EUrI_5H4@r`OpP{M^_8P*Ry%nS?g0RzPUzSW%L6SSaDf887W2#iB2w# zoi|;=DgUXzFFfk$yTmy}`Lw%W)TW)QFfNe5z5Lrh|JUsC<5YPWZ8g&;J+ZlEU+`EC zD<%1|3+%64b+5lmM8N_y$(WCl)G1>E_G z>!66qC3-}gEG=?jP&4Hzi{wALgyNX>JLg$#_!mf-xbWm0@^Sjq z`)xLho~oPrwmc+HuZC`@7$#${IQUj8mgQ>o)o;EA;!T&dzeDZcosz#Dka|i?0^15u z6{Q$}Kf$3P9l_C@XFa&ChKlkL{t*l>;KW*Rg|%iF4%47T3`Ek;Nj%g#;lV|PbV}OEyXk4oOV+FA^mNX%ICP&9nUiG$wAL`;X*bHJ zPvfE$=lfj{2=DGpKHW;A%@QlGBqbB%`WP_4yn#XZh%##c5I7F#vPm5ON_KW|JChhM z!0q!$ZlDmFPAmeBbv0?ADj*EE9ZwY2DvWrGS^n4kGfLS9m~+imEji-b)$LXG=RdT6 z`ptau)9iMAyUvzp6I!^MpBm~fvNqB7gaMN%l9^{YN|*{11=SmVs5<}E3UH^Bn_}-1 z?Dc(%%sgM2g{hWO8qT5_W?DoJb|)R*muAHg$1-byc!DFQ`k7S*u1dKw0h$$him_^Z zss!oqi3){|?KIKlNVs+KLIebRy_p8lu45|FSLR;+`40mHyI=kM&;OdrMIZc<=ELJ` zneK{Cz-Y^wBWxLQ_%qo#po;BXOiK>`DIg53hJuNlRgI)_wLL7JG$MwAk!gjQyir1C z79MNBQsw#i6V!=)il*96iMf7ve@|mN<_ZzG5RhZ3e5|#cr#h$7In|6m^tZn1G_11X ztDm>!Rmn{vxcx2608x^2k}e4y*I`h2u_}&g;I_@MmS-khDC8j{kBH-=aEo%XdC3?l z0OR@ou9s!ibj^B+w_b8*r)`Snlr9d_0!(&6AM>R1vtTJtvVi-5XIf?LqExNXuWhmC zIe7{XINcqk2K)I2&-}zAbzeba<64#jpm+_1rz1EJhC-GCtM^qty8nGMJmMkFlq*6R z%EpyYA~W2P0w}=V$nGN5@^HK%vxEA{lWHh$i&$gIB@sPGM`n?3jID+*$R?~%9y}6V z4fFo1-=w<1DO!Dxzxw&V{qz5p>Y8MZIK_SXw}1Yxeb$w;MAudOwtpRTFFdu{3V?LM zM@f>vT6v1v^REi>nPzKcNGxfjF~`8)0f?Wt(ar8FZ(z;&%I>pfQhWZp%9+f4zT{Yr zR;Lp)f_iw}Y;-dJ@cHwsEDliK28xFFhs*&MPRU6?&e96iTHcncGEzz5LC&_vjAkSS zaqU7hAC38L+u_Sq&o^|u&-1OSDSnm(#dOg{aeze8jZ~)xeUibX;O+-56z98S0=)60 zD2XvsYf5Vd)q2u8SZFFH6un7X3K11II!*DUNbM5gl2wB^zw6pSSt z?5(-=*urP=7`=&+7g2MTPgdER%4SlpU3YFZ6MTR$i|}0F(ji@|DLUuh58%_iR7&Tm zNsp6|PlkW{m;dso-&B*Vx}9?1n@2H(ja1AiYjmyKp+HD?BD}k6kovO_2j8F)=(Jb> z1Fh;7lTge>4Mwk$1tlL)Xiz@~@yRuwUJ{i9R`#r+4wnEO{RqvEKO7=}3zRG13TH8} z!(Y$i^6aah@Bi%HltzDIyk_FKatemLn*E6YTo`xOi;Q|RusUPZ7f-Ie#3X`B0E7Nf z-aD1^Tdf&Onx|8z`P2>7Gno|jRX%vsXUnqq({EDc7q`5&<71GH!KZd7Kt6G=LFxtV z%_b7j{!IqN7J4!zUs^Ymn--L6lWbFVfk`caW$m-a)mOhsG`Go3WpMiCSzUINLM}3p zPnCW8p&8GI75ZYStlecT@}vupt;4{(??_*yu}O6DjdqavN!=C+6fIbn516`|`o?2k z_F2J?&<>h4>t%zVDK?o)cP8j7;P>O0eFr9?@8am(^)V&iIjbbTn@Wr*wz)i4Js{$qD)k@_{LW=Yg%yyqY$uW%x zfJxiT1M^JMB@%&TSoTU_-Kipn!$(6|LHmEX|6a4 z!;Bt(jMhcqIyXFeZBl5do!u&5tEwW-7mpW2D+FkUBi8;sI< z&u(8}*PXm9X|3`!TLGDfmX`%3jOWsc7$e@s6imBr+H?Y_er5+0N#yMY`iWL7TX>$e zB)R9a;eC4s86>!Bv&2vA%_;^fXc(P}d)!;IB%S5i}&ZZt_GK{BeerI92IswhDApvTK`5a1Iwls5E^G z6MgExF^W<(XD+Qek^JL~R#Xr^0~vH>^YYZS@jKs;=;QBCe|D>eRGSrNz8e9+sdfnJ#UDVsO4pJzH6KC>k2V8}lV9^9|qiXy|%O#$v(% z;nIBW1d3cV7$!PUs?@O}DEudjmTak-b@pvMOn|u*3~dCCg)Wv#@-=n+Gwz=QzD|a< zY4AB!jbkN{9rfC`m*X61Q=^G3c43sE(I;~VUwY3C0AsH6b#&a9|y$}fcdqH1y$Z;@kuW%NM z(xr@p-XYYgi$(PEMDEfYeV>!U+^RXmVNhL#CBdE4q?!|uZLw_rX5&accC z5Hx5-2YSRYnW)?{Nuq(UqQ-`_WBZDH?`t|qN_QkLZtA3{cJf%-Xdjo zKvC@Z?;&FRUzYUWZaGNx5H9eCn9ao6YCP*~&_AV*X1R{5AixJVzEydAhnsT6|NH;_ z+ms)dh+7Y-QcwP8i0hmZ{6g7?8|kG3K|bd|eb2!RLjS;8Gxg1ju^P`P-1kBpADFNb zxkAnwTo9h8zxGmO(mJKsoa;Znmr5VCadpNRSr|F4grbTf+*9twsNmvvE!l%X_zDhwh#n2~m)GDN9o&$N0*Jr=KmYyz`THAvmQax&CV%{mXoawcg_OzUkH4S# zl7jTkW61^zK{`ub4?n$8Bm=bXKg9gk|99{22_B|em4GEWY_qebuBD;VtXVoj4Bxt? zdswd3a)6gAGGNmkSzfV~(W$jUeW+nmb?s8Omm$|bxG~%}@BWLEiKIC&h#kwkH8>1mBOE z&aIb|zj3ZuW~=EgC3;Wrgli|CZ=-d77XRj)TY$P+Q>yt5DyyuD3s z?Bp_lCXq*HrFE&*cu_x@eBVWj+zsn7;NB7^J4x0g(cEmb4^#QFj*joi z2|ma;@i{`uV(!W-MVAs39$q$_uQ{ZfWNX@*j%>-Olg?t-d4K)Fxa&}XPtKg=$TrvB zA%$ps)f8G_gyuzA^M;-tOTOB>wN%TJ^5V97w~72q;&HYvZz_a=$tu)AOnM9ts08{m zR2Fh6SfOnc1Xwq#_{H<4&D|K1IAX5MX0YsKzt!YVxwa7-ZQ*Qq9Z^9@VLVr|co#@= z9w0|}8082>i0Y?W3K$2A-*xpP46)OFTA>MmNn?~7x!MTD1g3eO^I{(-gN^NRs%-Y+ zM4gd|gKVG{P$7#H@PrL$j8t{};&_kp9CWnZVsLy&8K(&J=h=+mVZ3d1oGEL^R7WE? z3E$@h<3o$V@?}P&QTSDri#A&?QRSuwC@C475Eb{bJ1M?8)z{LsTMZeq#VzNJ3?RW5 zr(ehi4VBKsWE@m=LB1O&5}o0xkS{RUDDM>^1$Yh1&T1-(x;zWn^F$lh%NL&ECULK6 z8~x+>1|0(DZ15&BVg0p>wk`#_(H;VDM+m;3!K-liDq2&xxGIq<{s=@(30k37Ex-f# zI83{$KetWY!mG4cBt=*(D1b;4l#}v->D0vMh=$@`b zgEKF6UP0qyyGl~{jn;?|SfR4e6w!=!fsOf#yOzcJ`-9u%3+=VxXNSZV+ zFc~Dx)j8by5~CVzyd(^hnVyW%W2z5? zFlQ?YYQW_e$-6KmcDHIeu*|eyOg<=nnzaQ5CqKpLzmGE+hU+xIN3jvfE8U8cqA7G1 zm#)P)0t?bJRPga2z#8?Q6osJtrdx>Xt%3V9E-c*-^Wd^meE*(elr?u_@Do#1$#nfg zCppA;n2bJ%qNYj)w!PYke*TLPd+i5Dd;SFG0x@NkjJ$wvZODpMc>Bf-R7LRggB#Zu z#5eErE?IM)%cPY7DTNkl6(js@Zi{}$oInie$9%uC_VZlAH7db*08QT9HURO#Z|9vv z_wM1Cpdq+7plc&8uZ{Kb$t1r|%kiW}+DI?*^AMxy3jf+q8bA8H2NG-&Gbxw&W46cTsPv<$TkTZ163^tI%*P z=X0_;Hzdq?A2!N*Lip-FESCEC7|LJ;^>MQlQkH%-N{@o5U_aO*Rh1aJa1bqa>lWpyWbfytVfUrRMJgnN4>57&c#km8S!~V9(=WHR8kZ!@92H18GP^*5dVs)EH`F*x zV(!HGJmZ?5lo*ih>W~)_Zk^|fy0Jo8p zWSFdx-airqSPwOKCQ+sg-r|B7D??}2Xqg)3%menLT^_=nE=5UmACY#df`+Fxj0Jwg zp$Bp|DazBOt-Ktp#Cy;T}wGEl88F$<0I2xy&#@OsK zLE*?FcwMB>fBu9al29bJO-VJq>R!VUw^ubMDEf2t_t77jrDb zZy605$!RJ(oi$!M2=vx&(BDH;=lU4@eP{AvULJmu=gQ$aABZur3SG_dZ);#C=i8^P z1FgSF_2?1W1=xtw(6(9UW>_4*EHFhErX^z|L)uwS7H>9a1Lo6asEbEgpH2SSo&OX4jlTFVw$~c3w~i3lnhx@NGf&LE6a(dr94#JLM90L=uHpNZ!qUc+Q8jcQMqwi z4H6$?2Q5|%c*D=btfL#6wdPr~0Ug?0S}Q&^R)S0^HZUThZr1QF(dfFyOmh*dXv*W# z+O25gUk77*)R3;DFf*kkJn^BM5)=sC@VM#&)3_?_v6i)r^QD_dg{0$dooi6LKLMDd z&1Mbzh&e-nmy$Uu$cwco3Q%A%AaANm2r`oaY^yTW>Xr|_y7cG2^O~K3a={4Gg=He%23>^PDn&H9vnX0Ni6BA) zm4=N-a2t5amqkHHX|+V)-Y~iW(GK3v8z_nj?lIO zcZ#a>CmWUz5-S6+swYs27S2bni z&ccyXkMF%Jeb<|Af1e3QG&VTkO3I_V_elT3TP9SZkH3%ar%)8Wnp>GAvW~wJXGuoG zu38G6Oys$o_Iz6UYB&l+qPi-jSMT*mhWLA{r(Q8Hj>FkQ1JcmCh(Dr=+jsy3Q<^-u&<k(J6?3IBABdQVInS2I&i5~HkOYLUg*bsDZ(E`ik(_a=qdEj<;dR~R|5{qrc6ObH_ zp>%5mfarx{(1CXo@|u#h3P*Wf47J0)6LDbH&4{UDyn^3WGKg)EEwDIz-&)Qpi!H^z z*FgOn;G5nb$U|s3g~xkak4B9N&%OI1uT(B%kcRfx@Fnl<5yoC7JS%tpkIXNG(HKU- z6rc@XDDTX!!_CDHI$}_0hZ!1GSBF{(I&7iFT9Tu>D?RJ`OdbRqVOY&#UYKuGKiZWA z3qvBY)xXx`8l+6gOU_Xusrzw$9Xrin8x>#6#i(Lr37K3tE@w}5*wJZr4q|aGql*CW zx{dm`BFHO`b`b$(H-2IsF$3t~yg^dm|AB*iKWnP`#|d)FQTP_oeTYKpK?d~G=xN3u zT6R^o3QD{CzNkxu6qDaUI%1w5+6xcw|1Ms7!B-Na@BL~oO34}tL7EE&NkVE}5yvA! z7iPZ>a84P++3f;3`&s4M&%`e&^rW=_b)Pg0*9ei#bD0xF%?<(>2s~M~`WaHxEI8#( z9S3|ZgAP4BBYMm#+)TqWCKNRH(ut_RUY6+^iM49gt*0wQXs#&fseeEsX32E@i1I001Ntg#-+V z7EW0~_sm~JrG6h2qOoUTh82%F>H-Z}s+>^_?SWz@Et7O0SY)6OgcHw+*{9-c!7fI`BX;c$B#vbut)9-$Bay zd*3{XdIX#KWJ9{9et6X{?#|$dFzdLzCk~NG4`*% zQJiKM+COxcTU%}VyALUm;=g=j*Pqb~9%g6gIofmc^3)aK*$3oxKFZ`vG;4XMdvEW0 zEB@T8UNCF=zFA%M3TNMS*VEq|f1huTm*)pVS7{rjM)d_lSM%Hg6|Ds&}Yrp+nd;vRd zTmIdqEzp7DUpMcgY_p^P_s#I0m!HtjV3G>g%T|77JCX0T?*`tpLmYPl^}(yp;)}fp z4#_7w&6Ph()sCa|&9Jn)7npa#>jjntet%~z@;O(M&(77=v>$UW| za(8|5c^C8BuWhJb%ui#stIJpOo572jFSAuUo}+pIp}=~$3CsMf#`rbzPB&;(e;6ry z`OcLg*~#J&R-~UIAJKatReS z%W57Hh8WCsb$3Tw?Qv6LuhGO`cv~-pJ69X6S;hKED{dXX_P>WZW8Z%cSkr4C{4y*1 zP$1RQ$-H#)sg0$)cD#S_!u~iyj_AnsR2UduKJ$6)c;glRpkAnU8noa#ZmCVL0(idQPkMHAU$=bWY=pVeW(F970on6bconwt0zCowPvv&a(WD!xP8?zb)%& zqx#(Vv_*1AR}>9b5p6D84Cg%k`#TaBs$(};WugNQVApeDPFYJ0XbNmLaEjcB^6d8oWz z?ZEK22Gh8`M91c;7mN|d4rrwpJvX#R(2t7n*pUPtE>j9#+@BQ>CH=_9LwWoq6{ft5 z)RgUGRa^S5%n8W!7ErxoC!N&70pCqkGH$yu85KLq4)a5-W4W1s+v8M-_Mpcgp zpuFuGhwL-iV8}g8GC6pbYHnP$m6zWmJHwJwzF%MN=1xoQF$_@&wixoHSPBOEE2%f8 zv1jC?aL?bAUhgT=PWW$$9wa8nzih`K=@0AcLLn}p5hND})$8qlnoS?|cbjcG>~CN( zX}#SYYMsaCPn;L43{&O9fj34Q8|I^zE;@#&Vun}qO*!w;yj0i*{;}6LAIS3S0?YT7 z31>XD`#BTfrJ&%Y3c4d29C(@)800?zWDse4F<$wh2M?NlIlbt>%m%uO@bHnzVnfkU za>MDAXL^Mr#zA7EFBz1&Y_7C=u!v4=4c6R6s`p$|(+pXk_^A=pdml-=7YLTuU{G_3 zRnvAt`fA1xvU%ywzw$=aJHnh^X>?Y1ext%s`Q;ltoLM!9i8+5)F^G&q85t}9M8^d# zp-1;S#ha-t9JV04L@-C=#CTK=qc@~4IrPPA;Lx7%E#XZqa|7lsqr2^pYr4o5OcJRI zltj57(3f;bpKv#dv6fF)WcEa}<5&jqwh5tf8zatqr8`tqWone0n`;?;8^3^q3Vv*tIdTEQOCOsSwSH8rSI6N z(XQ>ZxD0BivD(QG`uOvcpWz1ouDrM2N9ulBXw~tqz?vKq)=vy6RyOxQa-SSrMVot4 zSY?>tOmpu!ae)7BUr9=h3XB!g3Ox@#7fqRp>|zAB@87^`Vn1&VySC*AcTWZj!~GVa z3#HOi&tF?eM(X~R>|OekmlJKF}6@X%iOb+q9Al65^kC5H8;Y4qg7FC1r^O}IH= zjSbzPZx2>m^s1ZOpyyo@duq(1dm-PcDMh}i?Y)0L$!%-boj%R+{jHwp`^jnBb3c0O zvh)7ZvfJ_b%5m#8YE#)e2mZBuW!>X`ukCg_o8hu!G#ew^6|5vMqQko8jrxw69(BH2 zFT5P)3keg{eo6Z{8rmHZs=X)i&AXV$5L!cLqkU+l!~o5D1C-6|dQO%x02{C|$^_N+ zVBoN(0g1LNc<1gA!nrP~%rSZL*r#xmdbV*&#ngktOwoOQ51d8RSj{y||8p&@ zmGm^tKl24^r?L7J`N%#FA3NguLlT#adI-U5s&nwxg+XJ!-PhOO;e2w4&iwLj25sLtn*HVs?7;#B%;pZ4|asUdE z&#PXOrlIEQwL_F!%Ch`7wpU3vU-V_sijk8nV7cGP#rFoyU|0cfR&KMz{jSt_S^EA` zeJ(dT#He&j8{wJ?5t4l;2R4`Q2K>9w0_)eEgh*lKWY;4~wyKCsa_wVMcJs1m?pal_ z2@mx?$>fGKm43N_t<^p#;)L)97_t0*FI$j<9H^_c*|L)o_heSsKz+e-_x*lYMB6%K zYca*Wo~GdZ4Y1s|q#R%;qtv)BfhaqejIovfsI}SdpX5OO*|~V0#M2Tp=_qp29MOfR zyRx%+%+Vqf<3>OJ=8#k|40icz-O6V*@h?rgb(npqmt4w)zb2?(8z~%FZ^%}Cu8iiC z$Zp?^j(V4}7yXTj=FGX_*V#(4(*dm-;t zU|V3@4HibkxXb~ISJBnOgvlN&uIO(V>RqT*rC>;I0_IDdoCRh@j2+tS<2ywLod@6# z=&H7BlP7uFc?-pfH<|@i#IR|>V%$jWT2+l1QupOw#4B7Aa?7BktXXmUifZUbbLy&G z^MQ2ELR5A{07z%%bUwavtt8a-=3DV8ra%k(G*kwWPEX5TXFXZoNpk#R?T*aLiONQe zC0wU9`|!v^M!|UNRhE@`CK0~?P5ED#m5m;{dHAf2=!?pf%uFRu+4UMf%KdoxRgDAD z!0B!!-G|Qc&B55i8pjcPe9wUh7dWub?ncAa{0SNqMn_M$hV4H!!@X)%rx$)j&*qten z-r2CapP#5VH&w;Q4U1OjDOImN19udIAKw)M#iatF$s{`83HL6} zrbz7+4ACYU)CU_DEi`+W8^N%%Gh`wHEJAKun=;a^G>Oz9(vGcWSGdPZ^K*h9v`m%` z7Md;!1Pxi+kzjo%394~aS%|)j3ms^rjv<($u%+dxj%JT+=7PBeBU3cut+AV@ ze5N(O9>Ouqth@@rcLxXBO3ox~oQQ zsvNh4ZWR_8lL&$c-wY&c*XqFj?tY!h(%tCt84cZ-sNM8-6$GS?VmS76of4v~IeY96 z#I($N+WGgQD%SIyHT@M^SbG0RITQm zmZRDzUv8WtE$c~l%xn@ox5(h_8#V|&wDL2Z5Tno^)EigRb=rD{rWpPmnq&zYfGgIR zR+AH}h~0Slh$4KAQrZ8gg~aA|`Ad9UMvyMO%8E$R;;=DR`C5T)Xj>u**675XU2Tsr zYA@^wHOSoVJ5pD@RqECYcbP?nj0?U`|9J39`3Z&qXY%>2=*eu-m@^#q#{QFAN`oFY zo>P~zx7G8?=cr-xK|1DRq4t;HV^?l!X=2E6$uoJ03?&?{DGIqajH|!x-`T-smm@9H zM}-IMjtWRBGx1dR)JXdk6)Hz*WRXV4oLOQ|i5*+31B{U$cG*w$i3?%=NOCG{IeOF3 z%d#3VBo_huJ@mwC6#n^o)SO(ESh4iuZjvUy!B%6>n5HJ2MPoGVC)O4969W8hwF>jG zDC6;%jN9*g&*|Sc9J{GS)gQ(O^Rc^^3m3<59}?GPKti zC%@Tu=ZBk?hQ!d~He^0?_Y?PrNyS=1c-TXbP4wUMFRqTv%@A1>EWKR+0rYAQs3=x8 zUds@Qs-ophmgzFspwMN3#bb);*KNwyCGnFk1QAKv6oy{1Cv}Q7a0Yo>NsGSo%@N#6 zGfv6uYDu0z&X4pBN!dg_NX-bbx;v@*@u6gqAPXNEsv7lwf{+fQ0y!;cbpv_CU^Tt? zv1C1N_2`JR7;s?)O@Y+n?aCUbYuhB3SKjy%J8%{YK@7|2q*se1!Xp`5XH(E-*@OEeN+RsKXP`Pxw8E;fU5iioaQF3;=drj**5n4}Ys0?oZ`*RswO%K2H z<9}scfeIdJlN%!f(m$ARSoLC8;ry;7rEcJR#KjVQ8y?gwFYx_BDVo6$h!Y*$w5Y7s zc7WkXB;6ow+1w467)rC99Q3@^64-%^kZ`g`e$=!HrkxV#Xcw~wnlh+hk)oTlcIH58 ztsF04OZb+#BLbUDJ{wkWa%zi6aw1WIc_eF;QvQ3VSvnMlmCNtaVIT*rX4W;6iw3=0 zJ2c?RqQZAhj)jT3i~EB7pMNvhDcHB0=_6m1HD0D}0WJosbZoCil9dQ}2HPUo1zf(` zXfShkB`2}NKu#Qc)J>VhLqtqUpq&lDS@6A`~^fiZl}MWS!He@FLt!GeAqR0qZ3V-hW!VT5C?tj?)TTK z5(){ub&lBZ#}9^{*j)%e{!Qw3vW?#_U4$zU=ZluDU8OJ+BBw$T0Tjb?>r&!F!@*3J zBN?qSQL{=pD@k7DPYd0KA{+zi5=S%8y`f9 z;SD3&5(vq)5x#{HcpNT;e~Z~rH<1h>GFuy-<>vwH=cBb`H`s4v@`8Au8$&O6UXou` z>A)~qyVf^`jjX^tcLeusiPtfnu|xUIX073x+dX!N2rUv&sQC&3jvs{a_eprOQDvoo0azG3ZzWRz$ii?jn&rS7S}SgAS*2{wM7>5lQT7zt$N2!fU-nVkihyZ zMp@Hz9-uEJ+lU5{1FKI!4ve7GC5`(o z5fW)`b0wWLn<2`*F^^PJMb?!mvD7ryO}bbvCXeOOVYV?}Y%1$GhPf!)p5NIU+0y~WsE{0&37Jq}4L{fIe{>|S(zlIf8bmt9%-pD)$$d4Y%yrcc_uoJs zqZ?rGa7g6NHjGll?3*aF&i;#$&yCFUa%}KC&7KrFxhZbay@B-vv(<(yDrJ%%857=G z9Tl$?GiXb1N;-Zhb(!?BY_s2bBhw}j5@VDIlfc%KoqgbiSj%W{^aGnZc&M_5L;mER zE4+3A5W`fTLRlxNw!ubyHUpesJeRr82Dw~}Tcq@yISxL-9H1B@SFV!$L5%M1hN$Sq zyf_Lf<}!M7yO(|h40SUC81|BJjS;rc0u@6AH{l%2w5nDFo~Ad$+KVbn7|qHx*>`VJ za<$%`h+X+QHO4_HQ=tFQ2xthim9dZpTZBf8fxkW&?)-Ws#P>_gTm}bgSA@M@Y4_;oRm~m zxWfLRlb51}^9*tTJg(iiwG1J|vELN2X2^;OBl#_#mE&DRSBYP$E=3Q)#a#L%1PJ3I zHX49RJu1N)<9xQrxJrCGjX~b2vh&@?-m6As-H=nG86fP* zbpneK>XjV;(fs0S6chH+MK*wG9z?D~6>;clZOf-7l(+Vv^x3omrnnN39uneL22XY; z_Ufd%8~R3xuY2idx~V4 z{mksBWYOk*HkR2tDP<=FX=nbHHeq9x%`}5W<+pb- zh?j{c(@Klv)yf7;$@+3JGlLJ()@W=8^p^MVL5_p)YRUq$;OH_&-Z2)X2 zsx*~J+uY^_Cs2ldCT2$#As2qN@8txr(pj>>O?TzBb)x;>9SrxR45y5L2QZBhu1c%^ zT*vdBM-uJfR@c3w#OPv3961lIwdQq4iNq2$n$;6w z=uNV%{}L~*2xLiXzC>xr+J2X+u?PtnA1*9xl2!jVAJ6`nN{&& zj0}p7y!H0ql|u$EIW6AuNxG(ttF$C|N&PvmG|34o$E%JyC%UEMJem;KqB7=0UwfQ< z%B1St?mqp@(T`(5tA?^oYq!0RS*~h|%tzNgy=D@f$GA+B#@0hb+owHxD-K%=xjvsZ zi(YXzr9F=?V@n|s;}w)sFNQlkSd}>62&Sn<+MZyr@hy!yAVR?BFsHoYl5MKPx*$SZ z#@dqR`1fv&N?yy#DkpBWfQ$EH^vj}xpD3<+>LLbWeg8rsmCOzQZgFw!d&pMvc8YRm zqgH;j@n9$c1(-CT;h@)iZ5pPmhz_bvn8}}Im$@^Z1hEjun zl~=|sH4Wk%aoj31pQm%rG!efqNzeM!<(Y5ksZLgSr8!5eaIfNvrX_ED(|E5QaA)!v zqpWqI4Cqx>MB)UjLMCZEt6EyUwyraiJrpt}P+7e1z9EGzjSmS3%?>bAmwwrSNsH2ql8Mxv{0X>7y>e9iwYqYCOmV= z8yr3opmw7n<`x}pIsM@hz3|oGNrO1fR!<0|75;#l$L1sLRMR*5x<4~brP8zc$B*ys zCWC2;t8$Z5Ve<2w!1XvRx8qw>5>N$3t*RjzuUo`jOmZc`KQY?4P?uPSC!?Qlr)HIw#Y_PH zIO$!-q`?=oM+{V5z5$*y5XNmAc*4+^=T# z2XijBE-^^n{b`Bgu2gggky(VFeg;F}Ueu68q;`H-ICWGX@O9@(Hifq8iYOar9A$p* z)*AL%*O*^JsrTD;uEMy=YfetCm7+`qQ=1Or&Mi?f2Ta83!#j-rX(=jG96?*K|Fh}Q zP4-z$^R4W@d4I`-oU6{nG}vSY@unri4c~fh3 z!E>xT!r39Fmw=vL!`>hGosV+~RF(LMkV70zxIhUOM#7FZb~>sv&OYdzdyHGZBB#oj zmbN^uEW>u&fcQrIbO0_veYeqIz= z{&I#|j?kS}T>)GUXhsL2NRhA0-*vN7RHr}PW3rME{3AFQgk9+_I7c6`b*Lq)zJ3Fq z8+B$NRlcG*6xp(gXm%7C+te!IKBKnP&hcoPfij zhvi#IcaaLsn9403g-~B)pT)J_hO*R~vq)W8j)@=++@Jk#;VK5({7L(mahU3)LhBBgrpJ0UijDrA~75 zk1+_$1Iy?9&pkca92XVKO1l&RSpHDGc^OfcL?G~9! zssw{+tCEZWa^1Ma+OOxea`!U}nPw>N!13-UY14RXjf*x~?oPf115Y-esQA`r{OgTE ziK6GC3K;q}MI|+Zpw`(c4EI1(?{mGCs;Ml(n`)`asHYVAR({5OUOFY&gOYB|InhZq zulkHGDWkrdO1()d@DF?7Tn5`mH16R5pd_$cX_G3)nlyyevOJjc?nE%R+mJcW#%VC* zZ~4>J?iX%6dx{iUsQHW8))&vx{_K7ac|2+=`c;!L;;UGrR-Bi4GqhvDlW- zp-`d52o0v=6j#0NV+AJh5P(5957HsvhT$m93}{052o=BRQ8UkmI%OF72sw3R>8dnr zS~;9Roi_tg^|}$3sS+CzbpqF?E7ntUK0*0Wsw8XFR+Y(412j^V38&)MCr(d; zmw9CcnL{d6Lc9*;{*$R>&6$f4Oi)F_G%Eih<+V@s_Hu(SW=X?VPr2O3fqB*|2km1n z25XHaI#n1Ch)H5_k#HS0(B`zR_??FL1m-0S$wpks8mN0>in!zjQX47chI3`8gpxb& zv&y03=pPZ?oWHeewt{ByI%~3zOvHfF1*&T?;#{r*Lco-3G81@#kW}K^t=tEg5oVCE z6megL0tP@hII^(&?Mao+z<$E4d1fcolv=-|2$BXJqwF*C0j{1TJ}ASo8bt}UHQ8z3 zT~{)DKZx8iJK(nXM5$T%U6&|sLxFL*9$HZM=p`~481kF3#zTIONAP?g*I|D7d7Y2n z60z*e26D)}?g94MD;yv_*jywC{4SpQ` zkn&!WZ~jYLWltU*HTOO8R|Y}sF~%f_=xXSwIT>kS<~;mRPz8ojeGeWui8p|O|sEVp0_(Gcup<0O-RtSI3HCV`$&I%J-?WrS^*-6)Mg$k4ArDCB@1XoPVaeEI zN--3U+ac}x_zdVWREZLv!2;;1EkM&o=}KdI31h?nY4g-5c&f8t7t`|6f*UM71}B@@ zgG7vtB)6LJA*lE&zA7)KX`CW&}ty>2~y9hGi6c}7y&BG&_ptNmf zuo77T&@~^Q$Xb>H@HhF|krC^ZihCpb>;NzG?qNq#56Q)2Zi&lh-)n@mYLUUnI}cFN zAqQcIYj!MdS1pCRCTJcttOXAMLg*90KPJQ}K6)E2l3L7}poXV3^NLgUm{sC9VSVgq za9qipJD$;hKJGlh^6K@5(HJBtot7P3u292=cE2Egus2+p8n&@!a6He?YTj9Wyc_KNZOfNR`S;S=s&OQ6O?VtMMxChI5L} z1w&tt+6{!n_P@;tS5_I}{U|^?qfTmVX71R*Ga`kn%Qp^&r3lZDZ{b^%E0Rz2h?qFj z@>dYHIbXrS@l$n}nHo7eg6&X7?IdMb*`??8^&VF%qK{{a0yC7qjKOd(3PX@)IFGUm ztCR2WKCr_=1XcONY<#?Q1|&Z;nAPacGn+d(%EHiu#1+iWVhTsFLK9sS_# zrR`7K4=uC@l=O&_+XVd=(*(l}{uR;`zmKx@#xI+%>+ixTDZ61#Tp;r`)tTdHXSRn%guJ{aZ` z6etB&c%;wqUd*3OSdjC}DFAw~xR|Y1*4}!58I{D!#Jg}9YII~784o@(>p5nZOC86x zB`BtO!JA=eRz#u5f77}Xbx`2zRDR?`sSdAEq;oTSB!~rS%%uJ&vyr$RTS#ccvFe#1 zwQyOSMz%fjeln+_ikgVx$s&H_U(Ta6n~^99dpV&!IpXruOku)I>&G4X@fOKm0zOOg zBr&0GOVwga0i?Fl(;urx`l&w!!p!)92U7JyK{G

%aTd!>qi(SnJC8vdSZo0eDiN~+%y3#*nkXWBBZ#AqIBr2loK3KeYVF?K&lbBD2xwslpWbj{`Ti;}P~B3(qXQEGzg`?_?D zKFxktODRZmw>QFT+!y^L!n|g$| zUYTX5me+e=th9se#P_X~bmgjpz<&9|mc4co1^%RWtmgGLTLa==qjigHwp2E(e4X26G)UJ3Fxq7`)l9SWc4GRJf(+1#3EnXXJkIraI(iDt+1uJ3U+Q2Q2o6epd;GC2c3jghnf*mB})y$<8WwO=wsg7lmsEG?juvK zVrU7CvtdL-q!Q^j2Q_&28Ifk_C`b4UJm=lH*|bZ-gySB!Xy}mks;kf3jdSayW6`LN zqQi!eP2BY^v}=OYYOKbXh+X;U_zR0rG=sX%L@o+}5)1q^c}#$%!DG8-;9O|>hMt&o zUR)%t!4H;xlq<&(Xl3o+1KR};xOX{uqg)&TBPUruv#uTD8oR` zr!IMOs>BY?D7CJpcCww7ymeLdp zSpsX9xx^jKds48wMWmeQ@S)f^1pV4@!nVzFfVjyHpb^$}fOumC6~T$~_J@-}?}NS5 zbs_FgVesr?+qlZ@oY+~cnfY+T2z34u~E0@|9#Bxc)1I}&R zyV{@nWF?8L3qk5CxL7FL4>2xrAu7WR7f{w^*R!W@%0fPoWVE=irUg|V_Vy<4Ow3LT z`NZ$dM7%LEKN8{Jjq%tEpPZ&9At{@u8v)^xVFxU^UXdoG!Lk}<@uorrJ%5Z7KhNQHkYDgi?v_(yl_VNTk3zu zsoLJkrs+4y9Ha3JpR!2dp@ueY5MtXI1P$Gy#N@Et7V-cf2JOtJ<6~v%TGnt z037Y?AiX-U7P&za;g?WppgBi);gneeV_8!IBh%iXN>8M;?n?a%dCR8bn?f(DRDm2X zsw0p{YB^$7fys@_+6++ec}qqG?88izfPKa7p}Lg77l8*JOu6|fTgEO#az^RJ?xv~x z?oJZ8%9@?cv(`Xm1YT~*bLX+8ahfU%#}|pJknp5Aw{U-deBoZQ>^G6mnx)=$rwX4p z_vf9m@0=}k2}y7wHh-EhtW-$Ep|OJKS+i-_*Bc`gbsnt55mrxR{N|j?_4uWa;l~L> zg%`2vVvz{ZyhWQonmfgbZkiWLAnj$Po`rcn*s`ivSC-{(dk!!v8^5N7w}7Dv$OZ%& zhvcZv(PoWAk%!pGN7VN7%DPFj>eqyiX^V(4P<#EV;BdY-N#ENlv2M_#i`=%}x!YbR zZ-PXIjv-mu zhYE@!Ms$D&eVs?}20L4!8Q5j+hMJ8#Jm3MeGcBr_iMQed8m6gn1dV4Z_dRUh*hPZQ zP?tlkMUm;vr6s4$KhcOg1rAVs?Iu57Uzk>NjJAZ!OEfIiXSSh7IBvm2_K znvzRS1V{$K)i8wO8s!2B1Y%R4_#(^F8n?GAGD(c3tV9rt(U;QrT=?%sjbT-Y7-@`z zrx?i>z>J%>%jxC!WMUNloC}~VM>Mzp-oC{`$8r%{_IH-APi~U@fTG-IHN`k84;K4# zVE1AV(rC5btUKDPjLh}jU7Z0dC9l)`xjWL}7bUh)M7S@x^(bIHPFW_m z1m{>BgxHj~$t^cDc++`y-_s2eX4r*^`%n32zDe-?@A)|V+?t}S*B|hwA64gi-+%8K zb*{3e@12=??LLhZz1+WC4%zlz-Rp{@cG)!FZA|;!*Yv~gm&)RoKl|VV`t{nK6Tke~ zx8MH3uH-7e{r1~$n*8S<{^G-rzkTo7&p-U=ykQW?dkp5B=Hke>~$#YaVP=4z$ zsUqmN`-F3X1@aL}9GJO_**AYTzxt%^-8G_8`2#8cG#As95K}FaHzLiadu-pFxoW3F zNpYnlqlpm5v3>hP&m4vw=qP}YnDyqH2>5R6)jvdC;;qGbnIr=l=0WxGoY1ZT~ zQRc)v%}rHsyQa(b+VK*Aq{a`jQyfjYVR>$SG+D5UnoHE%h9tLb?d7%^9!#tP3M$XN z-N^MFj*9CeJ35H4X> zw2f$URZU4$6M9CbZM<^RI~s3=>gYv1mkgTf)hn=dcV6iUM?WS4B>^cT&X)xXK;hin zklETaW{eYVu&3l&DI(egmla0LE8FIzS&8$LcZk>Trx%=7?G8c!Q&g8zMyB8ZadYk?<}K zH%;eVPEJPz9dsmD^Cf(u&e^SbM8RJOFq0x;d-=LoPfbYsy6++(Zt9%uX2A=2PJMnl zr_8#HfuOS^4yGknPPsRz1@`Xkh2s~yBAPT-(!JrRXnpQVP*HuglHG<<{7yZ{H|XKa z@cg)VFC^*suV;3vXC@71;>avPT$rXuK4mDOd~>LM7NUE_tS!$JVrd|J(|>^uW=yO( zl?Bw8e}r@FhcmMJ5@iR~3e{+IleBAkV=IpGi-3VsIkt^^GvziN4w-rF?hq$5cBVZe zx5Rh0YPMV9^awc>_oBjST0*7f!+&XgDdw(XheCFSs{D43?j!f;kZv<~MZ}e;O_tj& zsfmaN1Tv=Ft;uHH8Xlg8QXx{qb(t0|-iWiDQ=MzXOv<|`M7C93vxGwdko7x?P&{jW z1A6UU$x+L4?Uq4rl00_tbQsghXn{%>wPw1S){imcD0a4wy91FXP(lqU#8xpUXMQ&d zeAtl3V&F%@a-gU-1OLLP{gIhuLXHQ@w(295Fd~%osx_xoS+56aEj+pz9N%J61)zJl zKV9QVjTS|LnYLa`W2IS1SraS`&dlUMM%{pFp&X^9=~S9p&;k;&dsNICQ7bhP~w2^SRBYYZNC+Bu}Uy?OZqM}!iI5%=<%wji`+lb5E#Frsa8 z7{Bv7wK{~LS2nN~nCUrO$YeyvA{^#MZGQ=Pv=AC#bh!#8sT*)wLj&R?hSmA%ibb?_x$mmW*Ed#NXcisit|^nluNQXdK>zwiq=*l5K|Ch|C~K%BPA0YKqia5a#7X6x?{9?#3CA!!gr+v1Ii4mz zabop`d~^10qn;8s!pXjf4AwRjr19{nc1%E%z4}?kL60^P=}k}1S;=1Ta92CO3c>&J zUw-_4&e!s*y|5llB~t9gAHVheQ{Ke=Z{r6;mBzo745EKqvultAziR%%$0Usu&XG2n2MZ-Ih5tOvvhOK1i>GJGaLSuW`0)=VJ4N{z zdBwFPp4FIK{DOx}8#+IsXTl&nVVQ6&r9hf)XG#;(Qw{58vmu`0k=cWmvV;anmngec za(Z|%NeZ0jVlzIb|nvaXI&9j`9VqB7#ay~%}$J| zdO(Ts?@4)A0EhQTqf9WLn2&OU?9birAKGmK7H$`U;8{eNzwJ=5WMng_ zqJvWYg9GYp!r#~Qb8mw>@#skVibQ)hB23Aum+n_P-+4>LjvW=kbjFG#XPUr)zsQ>M zxqDqz8DO1zym53YJAt${Pi!*f&bOabeM`WHGL;G- zwRm=Hmc?csWYX%-!Z)JAG`%MHvZb+zTW-Acrp|V*q3?$R zJju(CZ`#xiId9t;Q2w`wE$(5{JYrMUF8^VYwR`v_bu8AcPL*MdEqxTwy=lbm6IZwv z6a0H|t4=~oFab)~lRaTHDHxrQUo73liL0)MK@$lS=t1RWw(#G5thx4$%YtovBpxu( zPlxGswxUU4b<^wn{{R30|NrcL%aYqhn(nJ0yqGA>VM*4-7s+9Ds3nc933=LMsi)(t z6iFaSrVIjfCcv)p%G+7@d4P_yIAisq&t^6gy=2Ub^pnhg%S3|3l2j!!$tq!COCmuM z$jhJq<@>*HcPRvv!O4nK*VGG|L^XDGxn*z%9=h0NZn*hx$(6usCvdmLc8yK1y|W{r zDsLi_6T$>D+;*FW{4eAO4S z^cRfV=|^D65X?4FZ6iX_>5aCcHLXrJLdOfFM~-*#HJ>c z+de&WGkc=x$e`>2hPY$o)lTSC5?CXp`1u27?&y?qsabLkM=B~GU|0KS1ASL)&g3Ip zF*wDbnm@rw0KsV5sR}yEMVpB=t$VUQ?q((ueMr6*k3>4}3&P16wn?IE86@dCDfeV< zF8_8PeG|RGl=0kF-^q_k`DTw8!m6&05udf4dht~$A>dP^z7^Bse`F8ti5hkQO;3V0 z^9N3ftzBIXp}0+E9N`;GO};7a@Kjkvyk!I?6}3K3Fhu7Ck(O=5`OASItc#+J5p-Hp zBH2C2Qrq*Tly>IVKNs0D93*Cap+e&B>p#7$A3^mAO5k*?f|RO*e3Vf)eWtLh-N`=+ z2CVn_`yvuitUs7?w-y-xyqPo5n{b7ZWX^kqenIaOeeslhJIkw;O@>djK+M0f7%%>tOz ztsTXf1C7zE_ISU}$soN?EM|79%5G_&iPJR+$^2p`XR#}w(6Lh>6UilFQrFMH+ zKjFUiv`E$)Nc!1O`F9L=L2kU9cxn&tu-c_*{jdXYi*ggcgRL@Ax%S<%4Qs{6%wBP7 zXRSpD38a*zsfPWAOhi7PbAU%#p{JH{YI%L!sn~C4mu_o5n8S%CA<*87>t|c!dIeMT zSW$B`d}z-4f6Es37UqG#)0vNZAZClY0%sYeLSq+A9p>+hBSAOHzzNP3>lx)5i!Z%D zr4DrMrKezFu($l(I|}YQvU;2z^h=Ro=^~>_RNYH^LD~7OADlG!&Tw+B3ypA}l$cIt z7T=x58Z1GuCKl^8zL;}N!MHNDSak3mm`d8s>`6aC-*=9LBr)3EeOw5RL5Qhfxio5u z8dQ~$cS<#`tv{Jy4-(o{0Bv4^x1c^V($B;X3Egcf(9I?6UWYJFo?EYLs!=bt20i3EVoY7^^oy3 zzQXf9i~zbSz@l(ouWH^|n7De4)_8L0B|N6-&Xf)V_TU}u^t(d+oW*=@=O!**M?M$K zn|@Thr_cks?rU5g?tCZodLVq!J1Cp8n8K2LpR|Fx7uba3_qSj?Sbou(Wm0OE$m!@3 z0M{%g>f=$b7W~nHW3ASS7vrLY-LHDX4_%({8YegCgK09R6VM_s562 z;PRCY4Jo5waLHL1_ zrH&#bb61)_ZjKoQNGO1qWH>vDm;`TdD8pXVQP5$zfnLp-2GpatA?!x>nj^f@aNk(VP8A_n&6L_{mD0FG-!fE`_&``p?1Nsv5(oA{M~w^#!Lg zhHZ5oBQ=II2Nzg3)~G^zGPNoVr1_FafcZ~ z`*f9!>ozah)rj>95%i?3lkM`6!%#d{zM8-+$vKZExt1Ee*NB}Hm1@YK6G7omSYDn; z4Fz5_OM=1@IT1=XoWcjJfivH7m!CeH4(fo*39~_(+Cbp8r~rq4(mYjW3=>f{^LPY2 zdV3XE?} z?hf1;6fesTB6HMHC3ZyDf-CUw=D>;ND0M)+-RNDCQFBuB6IJCH7R`v*{%2Nis+#o1 z<#VB_EBah-$@M-BcQRH@)A~Li3Fryl~87TAQ*#5m`a}b!;Gf4~vWC;k-<6S?4VmW$8FVw~8{C;0M9k zNv!o;sjM(HLTRc##5MufWAf~6lxCsU(Gd7!B58B3Dr(p5IP7;iDx`&j=n%Tav7^1| z4`9!Su%XPH#;uS+NMBO%)KB{(R{}4fa)g2*tgA-|;%4TSVd_qrt=_EuZ^P_{NhKxs zH!v9FLLg&opEEJotElO&#{R9U;L<}@DMT5Oc-pleBkes!w7pzY?vD^<`O!zA0b-Nh z;pNFm{Ag1K&&rNeqab?G+H!sc#>(o@ueEbo)Q8b=pXAI!V_T8$Mo~H<^6>cLMpkm+ zC7|zhQocK*z9TFBjL}3#1s` zo7p2ckfkmtf)Sn3NEqyq02Z~jS>GCQHm8=~5RAT1;!mpIF3%*Y?^ z)8be_SFd&3bD|l}92h*4jj*y->!JfsyXz7f$dfcPW$kMCgZ~}ce2Kpy#>Bi8^s{sA>=4+yGo~X= z_z@8xSUqXEF8m}gje^1qik}mBXNHn!%vwM$nfj z-X42wp%ad1B#+~$BI?gew99;jg24xsVeA`*w`?uz#jGA{W{079t=qZCS%nKsso$e! zksw@r$CT}~e&NM?i}hTrFptIMic!C7NH@X=G)IyNo(bj}brJ16Y;e?@e187)^Ax5ya=AwN9n-l4oh3qGpztis} z>L_Q~R$Ppn^^*tBsMca+d+vH>BJFGhyQho1&eEVD=<#UUoSDz*A6E-or7g0D){KLSTJbKO6c z=)ed~Ihs?TX9%`N;WFtZubI8IFcW4TF5(+Se_^U4=x(yvlRyvAmb?)| zmRxU$LJ-jK6N~8u&Ikf$YU@?M3Z^k88{{dZt-P?T+mb$`GgOu#XnvYa)(y4e6ldt~ zv^4CDv_<((LGmk0&2HKw7JVaUh`A(BPGuzB`ubv5aN<7RrD29%{3wH)v$~amg|GGb zXaBKe(>_7oF+ zE(NA5M8TWM^fN-aFC*bz<`@}Fx+DhWThe~>!9 zJPs6WE%&Jsh~(YzNoZ@@y6-B*q2tw`j|)P(N4L}^V?0373jnaO5X{!7qm-97I_||d zvXD3X2eqtYh-8{js0v`%YiDu=)kFF#3?=ucjD=`yKE@!*XWkEil$O(0+`tKow&FID zNqS?yH>f4T)reOt?yZr2HP6IXw&s{3&W~tZ0`5#w4xAoiZYK{)t+!RHy()vkA;uZG z6rUfkt6!&HJzy)S{Hro9U7)tsdR5fuL6R@-YqDwbX4qv+=`A|x8djW-j$m{Xk*tAS ztl(OT!Ys8S7A?zTZa3UPCAj^yjyzn)_&mW|v?_-TIw^r!pTUwZe>C-O>nZ~WRjT+&N_A3otfUKx*h z^$UA<&b2}#n3b@0NRq>6Pb5PC%UCflkO;Riq^%D?m%_~^CL4GQPKFA>{$7a+ch3`D z>h@=y{ezk>zRJFV-)NLIqwIgTKW5)zs}t7$lr6Fs;HFK9Z`KzF`6Em!gkRN?F+e*`=fC$p`)~{#V!~M~Fo+?i$xx+!(B7g+s~|>o zfDYxK`pL~)O--dZx?&EGjy_`h>8(B^s049Q`5X=yT%{& zTJk(VBlS~A=~hTtDPVA+^RaRans5Q;S46=hlR!>M4Y9UOB>zZTx>IBwVVH!ftT=^H zUlDe*dvBDgTPU!|V~tfR2{d~Z(V~ml32{h*2aWG;c8ILR2FQhjC7mXw|J#EYew%HE!Ep|e0X1q+6zwkD9w!7fLt zqXl8kx+Wd}UR|P4FtP_DiJ$#(jOhlqMHOZ`m)si*PgtLOLL*R|R%*_!N@vHG zp;wEb`wnqMzUxnprMg2~fikiKS;d5_9!jtLG&_}Dw_1*Q>6XXM*xRi- zurPD^pJd0uwLd`|SH&#`ih21cTU;`kj0gJTK5_H9>qaF?03KwP_3NSlpBS$A9LF!1 zfrDOKztkgCdq^1X)Sf<0d}`^p2KQI*e4utI+=j%M7*OT01IAp9z1)gp@X@TE*PLyJ z<%Eu4ngeu4CFk>E60vS$Gij}m>4u_SmuW`1169bTfP)d8Trz3#Xm*SCxvZqq2yqxZv>0WiRYtGW z8&oXElbW}jy@95#Mbr;|qwpw1rM306B}Y=y8AgY)nVOP7BRiG@@r12dyN1QNPE{5a z7z65FFqcT!jKLg+eSv7g>&EK8|MLI)N*mWGUOSugVtJ}1y2&`HL?QDgM$Pk>(MaK| zSaybyGR$ww{ReA-{BGxc^V5Z+C_dG}ZZHY3nY_BV|I81Xd}X6s^=!`MAbCxPVag&;#1d$XoyWeLzpxN zo2J{e4WOA{B9tV6$udh*2#&g{A-2UExp6b>P{z2g=e(uB58+=1CzPG5+#j!_HMB(5 zxkG5Zdz98Bo1DWLL2}nf#J!LRyIa3Z9O6mXgUs!&S(4JbPV6R)u!{-~Fn_X9|6$1< zBL!;`TFRjjpX!_&KpToEc|zuh4ITAja%}Bu8;UkwQ1B{T%~&&lU5ex|PC~(+DJwQE z)9|73UlU z1YDdU=L?vB-FOuPxh^_Oh+aRU!x~9aD4dyULSh%IH?U1|PJG737;n;e{0gwmkroXQdEjrz@u1y?*O8xDM4MS0(!msATQ1va)$T{|#b!q|?MEf{9Tv+euo zK76XmHKD{F@H9<}BA&3GQH^la$g!+^3648dLMg>VS@^mr#wVQ=qnV%LEH4Q9q6^q+ zbi@*=Vb|^v$R!W)VB9=tPxMCRC81xU(k1!`stE;6MGEupy;FA5m9N@O1?7wbaZX}^ zl?t&vV$-q2qbg|}<9+9HqvxVB*`=s@%=(;3+Udi7*pZrGu=j@1d%rquf)RK}F8l!c zj<$=nOH;mki9U++d`4yGfdm`|Z01RA$h&hbI3K)MqgTlX%+1D^ORT?%uOs%NB0KG) zG97vb;K$!uyxH#PzSP_hFGmT+TnvCQbo%U*k>L^yVJWuX-dJK6LaW?Cct}pL@lmy? zSWwg@v3(D@rzHUs+D!Z*6CI|>2KNf}Og%Ccf~(9~(pjn)>1<|j;BkqP`dSZFCP|ce z?Rmcm%~c_D!Wm*F=H6n>h=k5R#PUp_+@2&cwf(G~3(8|OKD`VNtLhkE;6XL-g~9hL zX8UE*7!piEqm1j{)K-8f*DfHGAi=2&JV#h%gc<~MRQ6x+xu2arx&-rRW^yX9R!o^i zeb(gh##zId=7|zf9#k3NKe5O|inuCZIvQ1$L0kxopRx@#sS|nSiD=4> zS!5K#XkY(v*qn^ zb=K`;wXUb&?G+`GDe|EThzP|oEASdmNL$g{4JmUV#Sdn1h}6l~W0=@ezQapC_jpzk zu7^l=Bt6ef;^zzort8GIrcX+BG=Y`vkhJGvkKE)sxzG|(Aa1!mE_6v0^irSd1dvhC zu#-)X3Btw2!oCSU#JYqvYE7MpM^3vhG=TRi>#^#Y%JWv6lB6j)Pjos5`(X_Upfg6E zRk{lDsvQ!sFo7@UjQsH@k<`uXU!>qb6$UFwf);_ojUs+NZ_5NPQs_*M4HvL|LgYA# zwI7j0QF=l)aJ#N!(?Ss7ytEr(>U=4iv~4SVv`EOEnvI2i+6N5;>R<}7I^^Txk*2=l zx@v?x)@7#}+f=BEWyWm>7sOKRxbBIE#Xdc@F_(hlW`dZDo^Ic2RhVijy{}a}=Zj3a zEd3?7!+Xz)-fOqw4^;Tx415;&wy!_=^b`0OjI3?&?{7Of$94VVT-hIA;KlGEQ+)l& z-Fx`)O3h&pyn6M6p2%IkdiCmMoqu-k%g=7Vy8Y>A_ddV<<^B6#$hMO2c}h1T-*W5i z#;unM@|$yQqu;&x1(n2JoK}+4YfcvdNXw+mQ}F97(-I2!;e&jPOONI5l3p)7Rk&0q z$&^5tvCvVcRjK>ipaU~%*JGb7Nk|esiwW#t=@2SvY!5+@oRfS(xGvhZ#afqg*c59t zaYR@+SCv6n750fV8LKId;db*G!99FoXw=7xG+AHlOnQdMh@NrwT|FiO+_&dm;6KVb|M>MM_doyq zE-oclzp$^06U9^CHQ&=3;}_vm&j4mXnZIZi{!!N7+K1r%=js%JBmOPyfGWb9k72OC zQ+xyUg1_g^mm9vw$+kc5{c+ti_53XtXn&g<-o4eoms|Z|`No<8|2l;~AJ-*+%k3}j zh(YPUeCOW1O)ua3;#Vy&$n*%N(Z!)CnI4gTgSz(qAo!TU}@ zWTTJ3#nj?aUUKYl=MH24o@4(gz%gayIZ4PT(xrwUE#xr#??3z?^H zQ}E@c^K_VkjZ^UQtbca20CzPvi%X6^9QwoPzxVOm%MwF44MRcch$G5pTxtf;zZz!X zeP>{%<_iq|V8NH3^o9~5V3(%){PDll`KS9Pr<)~2&{eo`Pp^weeoIkwjPhS zqzZn)pFXe4>Nyt2RWno774VKPyaIMLpdVILy7;>JCv0#*0Zml%DVg-;NVI*hQi{dn z)!!_V=3D_s`{SKP#Y|s3b1cQ|)~lxn>70MOQ>MXnp-RgP6AIwjbKz5sU2Vs>52Y=s z$6R#&{_ z%E!BZBc|wxHmtDqnvVGp;_PD!{ZO~g!L1)skn@=Qt%i#7svH8H!`8jI{#pak*J&e`uUcA+RIAdf4`F-Ww-h}N(X zk_ZP&@IhVbU&3vXznlWo4-Vi=;FB>VTAC8w(=3fZov8|CG8X5Mn>Pmet zJd;BJbhwlELol!Oms>Y3Jt!$M#6gFYHnzwA}^a0T7O>WS>-}uK(3ZO#-bQn8Yux$Dy*Nfl=XGZ})L$YC}7-~F+KZl%{ zLbA8n>W%NW9RiwzowgUPTS$+Duk5&X%q{q$Qc{vYuWZdBzB$;rJcr}hAA#8|?`=ov z2Q@dxn97)&A@14jJRE%716#ao-6bR7A@oUNtzY7yYCB<|)xS4tK)CIH|NK+k=Bh0Z zD)#w?yyr@@nvJ^p>-u(6^`I@OCJ~Y%e{JLl~4~9=V_A zcrF#9Bd3s8$T50R4~Vw|o;s=RAOR3I&>eM*(PfQVK$o1nA@)fzd5=g5ju_Q$#Zo*& zShHI{GSlhWeC~AU7Q)3Bv-d57CS?Qs9 z=YTi2Z*PAMkxOCnGeQbO@N!7A<#BCCEONZWh;xWo4tKt~9-Y;jQZK1Jr+~kjF)1?* z<(h+@y?;}sDYy}bNUL2teyxe4YzSI*>qs1Y(1MA-)(yp&gWkV!KMuE%4`Ivxx6co% z%85Pvkm8mnUQc0&RStJQbF7jb8Ef0iV_k+&CFx{=yIU#L67~4~AznG$N$cX3MP07m z%$W;9U}ySdp(+R7?+~*b?hJmfEU8%(ZH5OL?!h5g*{%0*@WBcKe&0qVJOnCx-n360 zg0YD%;8q|G7($i3Z=T;d_?h`3#VL=ev@%2~2fUfr0Y-N9E9uSZs;H;vNL_CBhOi~c z?1c(TUbjs<|4?kv5VoY4Gy#T*t})Kt@l?B^ymHvH_I+KR5<5OpZ;X)A*qL&o&^dmET>xN(^$ySbV zVz=P9oLQ8XLi(~Hmf8CrdeIm?Ef0&e`TLo&bCvTN8RD12-PqrCHJCTk^0JcZL%@=9 zvW|tY*`j|{;mJ9KEeAYn61E_I!K#IB8-a|~W~jX!@U;C47{nH9FZBYPp4A(l%@x`r zRD!PtvgILu$#5fQjm~G)WqBfpASTIuA8OYl4c5 zuqwuOC`KLjHhyAj)7)CUX=ap3E847T=LiXSpOzr}V_d#{WPe*1r!VzM^T7dAch|&L zpJ1uq+c1Fl)(7yrx`1IrNrd^LtPKfY^BO`q<;ARKNqSCH{{5H#lReitwY)0ljBD`B z!}xh&jni%faWsi9xJ)-Fv^_D?miN%6xO%JO{=P%>PRsOYsj3E3dk#mX%J5~OY17$Q zRXGorbIN3}y}c;ND1&GN!i#L8+UD4l_yPFRs<0w14qsX#4RWsi2qTMbC12cvA2GEC zg<=|YLit4;@w}{&MR~4_3m5LzTK4QSuz@)Zi;H%gVrKmMDq} zFX+aPE_{l2N(KW>t;p_X_NayNr?pdb$Y0g1^Cdz`Z$H zHu&Cqub8Lv#Z1A*zWkb@$)Jo{1y49dNy%+wZ{nXAWjXD@=6LnzpXlxsNK<^__>a4%qV-UB74lIUkyeBPD$9(nWK^Wz?laxhA%SZ zvhuCM~+7ut>lD} z^y^RHi1K6Qzu8py^E0q)U|+$h`0_4(0G``6(YGgEylU4WM4Uv57iNx&f&<7j3lf$X zor2{B9(fB^9cic8@i{>n%`K(F-u=8kwT2G-C75YGZP)iB{>vE{7mEk-gG_EvA2-M7 z5I`uG%u0bffnc~KPEmG5YB?G81hU5ZD1$+&NmC;WVuSj|DD5C@5S-oF5RAdqP%Z7j zzKV6~hh8XS(Hp@((>yv(^)yOi(Lp4wfbjHn>*JB6;}A&|MA9#5&gvuP#z#jGo*7mI z#iPEin<+TSPUrX{4&5A2S7Q%d>T6@(l&GU9HcG(lh0bH{)jbxCR6f{kS zU}KQ{pt}o9U>{Q^JDHi9Xgi0KG>u)7yqpX}7YI{WoX_T_0V`EeV4U#4t=MU*k_`iK zSz=6x34vcNrzs^sZckD^Jk3C(eHE)nGz1BsFyjBkf(``1EoFg|`5a?d(Fq^dgPc+= zW~|Vy*L>hSt?d|dehKrSioBQk>M!#&4^Bx4g)7Q&6)UUIOIpC@R`^=a+DXwXDus2B zCagAsS2p-nyYQ(*_25J=Ru@+J)$9jxU^|G-!#hlI#;92R7;NQM$}aF_h0^B_7q*V zN_Qn7to$RSfmrCJ+K>NUy{WXFqKr#pTSV)C&4M_qt-y{9#ZV|&P@N$9w^Z7|xs z`@u^={&aX7@=Ot&3hzAdQ^7TsJ{969#@eVtEx<^_$%SH@aN$G*QnN)nE*WpPdIP5n zf^^ZSH(cq$st={i(d4-i9Z7Hv^5?;9Oe=$5i4Jq<*`?nG^ZG$nFr^7ugM_t}$Hi5W zaN}bEtb4Kg6>fO-=ghT;6pK!XgpmSb>FR|)*v^t(?rJ6CW5eSbiw9_nai>J!jA9_z zK&4iHB~%kEnla&Av2^W`J@_iPFjH;a%?vYVt-}mvUR$g4CdNovjp(nesH>ccILU_h zr&i(pBYiVfI8}Mt>>vXSF{Z;rI>O{Ah6lI8sP<$;hOVhw^soq^MOzDR!y%AT!y7O* z=!Ig$22(;?)Dq+|hIBqi7TQ2>+u+^J~_l$ZkCLp#JbWA3 z|3`oSu7R7ID%^d3o2~wn!f<%K#9xWXUC`Yk(*wVIHnBq8 z0Nr5v$ARA&HsyXd<>Oh6?w@ZGfmu8zZ#4Cu#5I&tTS>j}D?HRfah+t($^hn}ErIIi zIeW|YV($7D65O=hdk1iuB1Tbjo{roPFhFzej7jE7OAF3^OgI;bad}X)5;dSeAVHpW z!5vRIk>(~`3H9o~k~}+AqG|mXHMQAL)|mE#r@ha(3DK$&HWnTMiDOtPnARJ!7cJb%n+PCk@t z>ikD=!Wh$?vip<4p73)hSCENY1 zjFrpV5=Q@DTU}C9hCb1pS8Prf+@|p$rH_->tG_jp5N>QLGz&GK2Q=PM14H0O)I&^Y z-W*d{yiVcZ*Dy1VPX2`B(x~H}W7@I6*;0m9P0w{@Aby&0 zz|Jp(MZpFmAI_TeYob6(8V0j37P`!4E#gol1(A_MLt}G3-PF!v?39)@&?6AN#ql|M zmAeb5L(Ie}KKH?01u1L1j}rzvSVL@UEA1EP5hV(EDARK*>ryT7k2p~W|Lpvs8`S2F zWf-#lm}Q+2b&;mhV@r-+W#*{8Ms0GGJK>70!-z`bi55z>lyvi1CU$2`qtTm%%N7P! z4*EVNk{pRwa&-HKWPl|wqZ+19F@|b8rfMeCiw;&`&n z>9PtT0v%ZWrgCR8?Yt3P2f)JG=hG&n#wD!@2Q@whlP@LB_r`=)B^SB^lUdP! zmO#}6qixDG?hF>4glmS(1NaWg!`On2SmVEHrC5b4wnE$sIU(qlCQKUo-MZyf`S79! z>|3o0@HpR?Yi$7FnM#pvi<6PMvU*Olm^``jxlerUr`@7U9;FkKv&FnkEVak@lgbPI;(7$;luNezBD(-a6ScOHX<)10`TEH_AUF4S~yGHg4aIs z>z@Q2*ixD?9n`=8(a68)_;%I=Otn>;=#^o`4B zD3Zmg=Z}Qs8t5)l`4Yx%B)Sr)o!(>@TrumOzEcZ#`ZvmzBY~l-|MpjT`2p z9?)+vry28OXGd@))+5wwFb9a^xWq`)J{m^4H`0%~v~fQ@cqFGZ1PPd|y_5(G8mM8s zd*l5$PVB9XI0o~+$&2t>ms#Uz{f9B{jrp?<4#L@lwVW=o8%9YVPn8@Bc%h92`%NJ1Uj5B#>I3Omt}(r73cay- zc3|iBM?2F`FnWcF4YMu1J6#K3UYDhoh8>?lWSS-&I?69I!-+kGk9LOtc_RlvcI4YN zDIw?^#e7njVZ_h;{XzG!}Ve*!_ z9Q>d}e$Wf%QUpin{+&C6BXqc%>m~J!6B5dkVP-_iGGB0~FvWCVkt<}XmTV_A+LGKy zu1U;v@P7_>f*&Cj;v#ZtrGE6FKZT)>n;^M^yK}e``aL>0c^9Z4j)F8bj-KmDZJSZ{ z18iyP6}^%DuWYI;;VxWH0|l=Bg9i6#aC{DUrk}JVTjUkb!ONLgB(`E-2rF_PFpkYK zvXO~JX=8zF@PX3$K(xUI59rW$+4s_t;v>V@OlC){Sk>#m8gYtyIplo~d0L-U8X5nh zHlq>JLW}KOZxI_Dp2MBVA41C*wZGRazqP3eu$S>+$_VLtvlQ42*`C9n?I+wSc-Gko zorCU{8ryoR0#B4Qa}7Sv{(T-#r3Y@$7oQJq&jIhVXPu6jM3SvYL}o`ztsK^R1&Q`;7Ig4}_8z9x4Ku&>Bb0*m>9Jj$ z?7i4Qa^h*GGDi^GNT=im(;fH&mh z5ljNzAH1Oh-fYi%#LvFKx$(hIXVQ{|*yiT|)V*GrEt82qD4PWJx*00960 z?0rphB-eH2U&(O9IDl|=ixf$b0>hk;o3t$l^bt9%suDc_mKslnqyes*4}QUiD*ebZ?K^ zFR0NP>Gk{s@=S)Ip&g5pu5ISxs$Dgd6rh^-N+rM{X!RHk-Q&Ca(>@X2@-hh#;;uNM zA#4G#Q-M?pN>UyFJwC#P?(yw?79^g@$5hMNbvVH<`(2duU!brw4fW8Gd{uYA+7)YZ zwLT(-9>UEgXRRCRw(1JXxvRX)I(}62*TY;_b4S?p`|thn zx4(P;gU6!L{XK2JO88gSts?a5YTI^Q#hMUtClsnIPR`pQ9JO-6SyVk1jPCo5{yFYr z=%@wRC`S~vSDf-Z%h9+#hDG=Hmi`1J+}bUvwTI@lx!f`)iX29bb5&cM+%E9<7#7{* zoBb;s+#6i%feU?ymc8iP9gUgCX4*Xnj(#ORa~xjSx%(?|pK?-v_}1I+Jcda3_v8Uw zEsk-zL26&DySZJ#fx4R1?`0wDbHRUX3C`^wC(G{lz5RJJr<4gKSR3kQF+pEF;;Zld zef)Swl%jdQ#emt=K<8L4*~_?EZEy(U4VZ@*H*F8r&ByTP{@&nUni5UgC`)azLWmkS zX`QdSYHBJvwPC{kG5$Gz{G$zQLW$mb40-PFX?sQxwKJx_>z6JOFKqhNa6vFh3Hc4R zs~3`J%n~M*MHIqO2$K8-RZ7Nhh0J}7gEINg7Bhl#XX1c0v;dlM2|qbgSE@XCvDxN! zWi21$r2BiHKk4hs>;LVMLmhE|DcV|#e$LcE)^d*v&XsnHlG0XAukLUwy%e^u>w)hGEQ~9z7p^=(i$g6&`soK7) zpLnZEZ&dL8?kc@EFY;FH-5=r4U!}eK{x{Ly{gHj~jc;cj?S*qCzMe3g&OR+gv*Ghq zygq8y-?Bgc#GP>HfOTOfQ`Pi(ki1ZikSxsgzfuqP&%c<5>BGe(?LT~O^}kf#Nq-v! zv!k}=*vg58DLv@VNq@j=ul`$n=$-oYq|L7!6>?{a2`N*|)O03YztqlMHDTs&HJ}SZ zjd%Xx3hvGXeCtX+m{TRiv#9HsZ3(ffx(a1{old#K-Jwh52k_b!- z+H)oid4%Xe7GKFuz=7Vw7v6a=Z~uButf|;|qA_-0an!qwhZm?&Wo_*QCQ{Vix;SF@r9rZl_^3TMY_^bDyyyMY-_`y4gPY<7--L-vsWcPJZwXf3VJ%p|i)TK5^GGp@LlAEWxq#ddC;V;+%8iSF65Jlc)yc0+dDQ4L2G zG*fe%kL^H(Jux0#yFoofa-Nww-(9!wja?R<9OL2oKfzt#-L#+FgS21W%@er1)&qj7 zVU~Z&hG{ojSh5;{Y|4NU4`I^FdOSSY4^MSmr&}lbx4BObycUw?Nn3JPx+|N_^~+Vu zZJ8(M@rfiW6wP`qZy1v^X2~R9&9*}LdO5w4&0k6c&MY)b_@T_49F@@MXGap*TMwI% zLENrQQ{y<-r;Ke5JpfB0?jX{6v@LJ6V{U`c^RY~e>PwR`vG8LeWr4qJl^dokhI4HG zY$xmtHI{8NZd9;UF$kzU(dKN1)%BP1f9lv#`Jq(sLN5*;g1%xAX28vq8AnH-I!U4B zLgaY@SMagtl|yNz3?L1b{<0R^7 z`mo`7%6hl=N{a+MU}{8eg6;!AVlfqTmXrZv^mqWiPX|Eufoprr7ay<9?WeP3Z*r{J z$a?m^|K(^^K+07_o*25p>a4DCTku(|?^L_FpK0VzJ6r~%NXeHZo@^OwW{XfRMrLXt zbFtX;QeuSbmwhuIAZxp;T%7fi&xh+jOzht>Uv;ef*nni-1-44D5eu^ z&&}8#vS)lpbXIM*$cKHKhKD&+imhEz)+9L>&@R2H zpT(q%!geEZwP_~i3UOZ;VbTw&4YAGqZ0LrIZ)HuaUKWw4H$CbPZ}X^!t?GU7nyTJ= zZ-0}j-UqL$>b>*y{ii=H{`lMfS^UEY*b!8+ty1iEyQ62pd@F!ZRv-GVEg2ava5Iwd z=DVBoV;lfz2)L?s?MPC#7qTC2wxo#C#Ixu>v2@9 zlY?a}(VRg?=Ax2=FtuK$&CCc|KA4IV2T;qKE~(81puB2fCVYgjMqw9cY)LmMhfHY} zaXYjtIWLw)YRJ3)>N$3wYy7y$6*+8RVj{6ZSaK$q+HrnBk@Yh<`xQ*j!VQ(AZ~0=z z-Nx}R9B}KPYbT(67_GMJLVp2Ilgtvc%Zhr(9~($$EcjVs*8sJoN#~-%aN__WX;}?m zMbsj(f47ItQ#fa={af437C`l<#V7H{zX@+@0{^Xv*2(jC+=_8Lq($)RXIfeX@cLlx5+lo%TcO;gVjhZfLWscH#OXo%Q%?G<%K|7iM)=4>7#2yPr@ei#110-CAlO+6@n5G`orUPv$th#5k;#v zE~?M5G`zUYJc(6)s#hbYVIF(kg>I%EgDLw_Ouj_)9`1NXo56<$XH@FM=7|RS zB&$HJw;onxK}GCE&S@gcBtViY^PCpCN)j=_tuUX02Z+4JZqQ(Y_OkRUW)|K_79F%f z+28j#bGlnD1O_g~_Iareh--L-&%K%zLWVy>^<8qwsP6ML+}2V(vjz2VYHg2dXSlWG=Ra?+?A952zVeXOO7b;%r$h)VeyhB}sc{^h$ek09C0l2FYTFzO zv<4op?LU{`fcxCLa#ZwQfG)sbcKDRQEyXQNG9j!$Le99w0?DOc{~o~v_iVVybu&Nb zm=7x}%y}%#*ri<1!b!rvt0&v>#^_kna||ay=o{;Qle@Rk)mk!0T6ytdThH75<0ri& zu{@y&$JA_wP>U5DCdJR@SF7)@gN zKV(sB`P_)8aS?L*FjY6^c00F?9yl0y)Ap8a8_0SuXN1}fK0V$;?m*d2{0#FJ*ml;U zrJs-=ZnUrtn@nthUP4`MvCHHT$TM;^lkfas$FvtMg=ee=?d>M_nS5x~y>KltxHX)= zJhsiIhfGdL+t_c!!*hW${%T> zftX)@1dX%?k79q=S+Od|GW;;rNLnYvqG?0ZVXRAAM2;O%iIpUCh;QBvuUB#$r+fD0y8&1l zdVl@;-g3kSP1Kewk57y1-y+hHG;reaO~aDth}+Fp(Ilgt^V^(pBSDU3x_0%!bjUuL zF2Omok2pA!RTm@38p(~Aw^W7~@|Drh(N3ccwHbhtO9=qWSf~EGrs|)BsC1a+u2d3c zCM9QCxf@Zdukkeu0$@JXdrz|(MpV6w^X@F;oPMRSCk1!FuSqb`XsQ?L9*w;!%XIxE zWVSyvl}U%0o7%rDamWSE$IjL`lx6fQkJ|2p?`OX>R4wcFO79!W`P1d#f{*mprW;y% zWGhaGcxUrpztdug+!fSv204kXuh|16vbxk8ngp0!#2viDq7ZaGkb|i#l9MQD|BEz! zU!kugKY!g41%@Ihf>6nFj2Uo5M!|f*J{dJ(Y+P*)Eb7NAUkmiU)Kcb>58}PGC$#wC zG*j__i=KJ-WD#d&&s|@2Pt#-o)#ri9<5+6LytNOou!bgc!qqZ@v~)}? z74H{U5W?=|;$_&U)ut6|JSE_yj!P+b7C6)ki%{fD@#pb{Wbyc-?5;sy;ySw*8W$~s z8~GbK{PlO{k-4A2?N95Lou1Lm{vx&KLAa89v(qA>8U^H2I;IZ;K|s&KEQFS9n!?&G zF_;)P06*9$wd00(T6~6EoNS?Rq`Bo<8Y1SiW>>>oqpk7ph;~@df?6sux}jE1MGT$b z(DHbo3QWKcy5H#G&~m1A&`3zX2D^IGt}NeM9#T!p>xNtm`u6jx@7qv4Y0}f6G4~Y# z81`=2!1ZM{OSF%E%=OES0z^OE89%~7(<-n1@(Ab%C1Fhv3`+HChq4EVPNivaTnlPb z;D$TBvS`_~;bk@@Qv`j`i$AZ%k$Y0%JaYZWWRT&7cy`6W&CUBK)jG~4vyw4-7)pBA z%{H@{i+~1O-mqs9O|=(j+PVWIPx}B#WUDdwmfZre-`kNzo+IzAQGd`Ee5>10w#f)q zT;%z6#{n>E6k$mcqa@PMXf0WRW^M^9c1xH{mei7E;a$92p&B_zp{i&@btJ~))~<$5 znS2xMTE|#wS#Z;_7j3-~_%6{`t={3LC}nvoWBo8&VF5qeS-qEG9gz^d#D4f42feee zB3OHJ%n@_Ys~Jc&shhFY>pQ5VU=x>(RM>~o5<18onGsYtU)jRHt?GtQlo_*u%xd6A zlx|dqrWE_==5uiS2IS-7#O9@+vEe~iTuKb!dlFgh01vaCZp2lJOWmCpARfh~Kv5=+9CY)UgnLLvbC&_A2mUO{Da zIs3t&6T42qq)&^#pDRu$QDGv{5v~J>O;JHw2=G)g3SP9&lCNG@mdASVW@aB?x{f!- z0+ZT(7MF156(+5c=EtW{JeEbDLP0-?9MFXy2U7joi@x!!kUiWHF21G22!fpdp1ui8 z=e?icOeZiEMaK5nrf(wpnman{VhJ^z!Y<%vg9+s=vA5b84JaG%5I+L%gF1z4J@w%_w!b4{= z25Qcm-L4bOv4^`X=FdxyF5$GOfh5p+RhY5t!=WEQGC?ILYqDtJmWiE_H?A9HCt&kSA(y}C6|&I-EyJ;^1^eCQaDL8qmwbc#4p(1p+G*m$ zUT0El5XhCc3nb(R_t&p1&I^!$0%r&X*g=?v;Vb~ZM+GmH z9&S+0l2T?=O%Rju#3#Y)z1ugyiE&}J$8P}76b`IY-K9pJ zMC~a_uJ`ylM%Q#=+qJlUB)elJ`+UfVGch8SpT1XGDJQh;A$%Re<7!10yet5*JkU~4~KoUu&Fl?0L1 z!TJslsQCP8lR_cXklYjdfnJr^^^E3&+gX_iG$DZv@h2jn-^wNXQ5g&JrNUCRQK=@R zM#@^T#;l<EQ<}()Nb@!+A7>k$U#qpqT8_YLT~+2JU`f=l>n z<@it8YLzhJW;wb_cM8|Ya1hnG^P>xPdl9u-1)G8E9RrDFd?-E&?#dohmeeMs9*)WR zM28NECcT77n% z=3{UUi$0h(l^kO=&&^Pa2ZLkKH}Dth5ctB@i>bypyB&s%tr%M?s&~!&8)leimLhLL z5xKg+kM%X=GT<|JetYXlHT)!rv4mP6C@JNoEG@KFqNiz9nl>G?3oe-8y%}cz_VkDxdyv zN0U7S zkYY_HAgLF+RF&fEfH;=OOK&M`s{TDvI-9GdAxZ$uNf)B-uK$A}TdyN{HgIKsm6S;y z(3$t^xS#}MLt1CKM^<>z%mP5h^89?;`%a$5EC-+QAaT$6u6TAJHSxq0Yt%9~temX! zk@{*=FL&=P>3i>Vw_^`H$MyS~j)nv6l=hQf6ky3CQ{LPMEv{D1N7WsHI;$fCgduDe z4e~fiN2?k@wwX52oO>Y_96w{2_v4Ipo=x*`Y<}B+QCuKSb>6fDa%cro^s=R{|GM+mOI>(q&W2YYUpU4cCX*4JkzRGPGZsQ< zStfmQj;WAJalCyF#)cuwbbe;FZ0Z?E)Muy8SYuuBVF8qPJ87f`V$#-NQowNL6fZww zDdQW7S?@0hqHnP&<8&kX-ioX0Q5!1<&kwWd*Kq~qWckCP(kAt_I#=3Wdvb%U7Z-7<>g^MsnHhPwl!=JI73kNy|Y#z>3 zwF)jzON(bA;Gnnt#{21$&Gxc#t^4*iez^Y6EGrP{+g1b0mawDTEC;>O#y}PQbDroR z$2Dn)@rGPatirz`7u5N-NS?gRm$-mD^U#b1U5Ww7V#&eK;=3)|^&H62RLJBAE!&M) zXEM)=qYQ~JZMy51ppsVtBu%%0L_=(-#xg5F0 z^;c8qR0IO1Dx<9`PNrtF1=m!2{bg+mUf>u;r^}rl*fjeY^RZDbGbJt1lEV5He%d#{ z8zs6xtTpHeYMxsi**1}Oo{z%?SM|_$+0(}+NGt_fldCJ2+`_&t^0w!`&F^WRw~nU_ zrKbkG%~hS^h7Nj5v?j6gb%=+w{&!r_?L^^O&J~Q9B;s{4fd*>*2UC6VV6GS{phW7) zmyQ$)T)x;2)8+M-uDKz?mnn2optG}vmg>$YeBbia=Ndz$p^C4UBtJh;jMdGp$pB6w zhbvHOfQ@$GBqg%i1O}>5ZQOPh%3u1x5I|SS48IuD)9m`F1RTd{;w-nvli-m4yLm1# z3}G5y|68Ff@aA(CS{AExHb-YsVJ_Zz?~lLz_y5Mw>xb`xB+jKn0EQvyiv@D^>#vFr z;Y9s6QgBcG+0L*MGm)wQ%dGLkrCg#56fyy9Y%Rc`yr?~tZ3$9C@&cly)&{A*{_6CW zO^0cj-JJ$aY?w{g0kEN*K*HL!MKo! zcU4_zLz1;+5D1TbUf@X>v`5jgMi!LiC=tZ~#?K+QVIa+jbCbgLE?$*CpDn`RMV7VsD_96QZ?lzO`xfx%fbBBP&Be12 zW%C-Gw<`B{%UdzB$ng&AF+VMSNtWW)-STcz zDlvNRs#eN)klS!~KG#FB@fv|UNSvMNdoLo)Y1bES0$ksC(>?oRosbhTCm>5w-DW)e zx8K#HHuO@*YZOC!$29!OlVPa<%8dKGomeso2DEHEiEWf56yWh-uh1hQybcg(d7^j-wz8Dd;a?>(wcU zmp25oDrVGO1&3lqAe}d?<&Mb8n-vG@Gv_)Z*a%)GXyocHF$`ZG?~Y%f3)1#PD(j5% zDDDa>CI+mDBIPGxfc!MTZW6@TNkVIJihHG#e-=iaq?1R?u){hn)D<&7i3vVZFw$xI_J@GTqo72IJ%i zs%#Jjul?jNjq>O0Um8d_c|NtPnW99pN+ZzEc#y&>E_3o_q7`VwDHII|Vzc0@M^#FK zehk5QC}V9DqV7d+ssCo^!f0=t*Yhl{%4bRSV>v1E!K0XZfFmDHYQGSlH5=@wOG7qv zq>wRi+yp`ArPaw)yKGdIKI)_#l6(`1x1SdO zK>cvl^6ivsYKIsIO;a#&+#F3pNEK=?%zy$fP+XSnN*#fkpn)6(Q9O~!Ruz&o+a zIVFmcTA{MUz5mc1)!Y+a$Z4#=4&%!6%6ZKsfBgL5LZEC_EGhyW6i4tAJ4&&0nTIXd z!>wFUQ*_MVfk>CW*aW4%D)$YZqV#u5D|R-xdJ`LBBE6LP99P`>HHXaV%WCkILix6S z=KbKSeli`(gBTuNMS+9l!u%QXu-bq(&nj7w)VAT)af=KrIY&Xg%7-I*WQ|4Ucxp7^QvY}t0y7=s}`As;I@sE0HEd60pc8Nx;KOC^1 zYiXTnzhSbT)!9$c%&jI#-|QppIP9Dm2$#*9v_K>~rXM!ZG}(EwPcc&dyTxQZ20PMZ zjJ9@iyGWrCPPw05)bkxte>SZN+(~&CHp)cp>@+2F?Yp|mVk}H7`qUKpQ0AU>NJ3?x zOr${KstN=;uJmYsFGZUiHdmaevhr!r_w(`_&d2xWKPjQyL^6E2GhWJm(a+uW0i|vp zi>E>X5z@8Y-?#hWJfq0Ms^N5 z8M#Poqh^fv3#I9tmZ@&nr$As;n{&0Ku(JJt-Y6=2vnjmFrzz{8CrnCoQHvA((9_Zr zb9g^Ej`P;@uZ4>*PNLFn>El9rNzagMmbw~uR3x#=3}6#Cx31dYR#ntzR;{s6hA<_p z6Tcd#7RwR<>q5**`Cm_C^2Z=TuD4dHN=)tqzEBpZy-?y5PYt)21}v99J+jG}Uq*l% z7ci*mEHtHcIF!j}V<5Ah!ahJA4j^uU(3AlMnI?)|zN(=d&%C=W5 zU?ANg8d5v-y;5XFQ7IK&T`NfRs?||KbFfxbj-{n zdooL#X7H!W5OZw4KrqKD3s%-f&(3ZLKSQBxgT&C1M{AjBA~yO|GRE3VGB}tLjl?Vv zQWDr{N79b7e^-_I+1p4$kd-C5@{FC}0*g~-!UW&D)W!%7*pzL^H`_(V5;B{>`Jy|R ziPg{t0E7yNRnRI%N%m4P3-pJ#NPkNLVzFeCCi$|1_x)m zdIfMga&_j~U3WXbqpbpUA&objl+xL&#TS$ z!{V>x_c-lM84pxgbR&b3Sg{VOMMW=33S!@_Sc7WR43q`NKsM~v z^R}^Y$8pMTZdc0W=&5I2qm5+_e+8^hLjQ^v(`JUY?Z>LFT+FF#!P2a%NveFw;7jQ{ zy|Nb-)n!i^{~DwNGy3=ch@&sU+`SAyFKk<>Ux? zrY6*KEvHWDUzp(GlTp=;)c_8^oLWxGaLcv_09`<$zZn9J-q(0~HRKx3Ki848g`>xt zK5r(r`V&z1F*v!5-cYL$mNw|!^7`2OF5#7mc2^2S6R+0?LDh-7;=x24zYY`{7G{*e zYPN3Z0^=;QM(bZT<)ZC;L^a3P4LjxX$MeyOkwf=_cLf3sd*A9h4dCVEwLfHC*-iCa zyT4*RgS$f4tY0axLW^P%O{{IB($q<(@%lfys8YWbb163GGgOe+OgGyuCJkRhPv?BS z$X-h(hET9nL3mGP;!4XOQS`bH%WqE_iE+dpZSWB~jVtEeE)GR1$skmcUh}I2rIaYs z5bKtx{a|FIz8q#;?^)4eZr^HVVi>M}KVjgQ(=;e!gCClXjtuL8X=+)Up=3SSt2vD0 zhwSt{E#iu{GmdIjCVXd)K3KpWPW;AF*T0#o zX_92lvPadBGY<#3qDFiO+)auaa|Zb$kY)kjL1RE^9%1TNfY}Sb8m~P)C3URuEf5g$X)}3O@C}e&3yy!%IC<^jJO;h20 z&NMgFHU{pXd`Ft1FcjZlpf!1)ia-=9a0Pe}?g`#5aYri9KvbzpdK|LH{ZV(D@Ptn? za})1dvnVFApe&oqY!PMewdfF`-v^#82;xXVuES7}EoTGp_9pZ4NHDwEX!DOd z-c{`n#7N|tn#F0d8Gu!)WbDCkJmfZZy^(N>zqARe>Jc|&gCK}+XIW`$^!x;Uon5Pz z7GF?+P#wHbvCE0pWTR8A8Y8Ob>klD$)#!C~6DkZh z06RNlQSCjcM5b7P%*pUX z@}iabgMmzqk#B16#r7Fig)r3RU_I@OCuB+%wv6;dI@-A~-w!5O{Ftg_mlgSMRvhOD z1Lo`&Y{%ieW07)47%+f9h^0aEMt?=J?LvHVLr;9aA68v-JXBC@$L1e#m@r`zcy6l zWYq{umQ4HzR+`E9$4sd%3RCWo3282wG-YFo$$(1#X2B%Z`wRM(3?z|dMBkJ$kh~pU z%f>+R_Ny33-h20h_uly?3?%l$zu{5wn{sCxzVq}0RR;c-4d>(QMuEG4UR-Q$@@v7S z2EHQMZ)3vgXSzGs?nW|rXq&cQ)9@2=Z5bDlPi%(PwaU$qxA|2Cu zJq{$2@T$>hJ6k=$WH5sO2+Iu!9CVCTk|G;zrkjX|-v~x@bWo=uNPVL$1!lg+gt@8= zFIE?=y}%K}^d$p=_&*Fokq^fWhl%gFBP(S}1Wn7R3lSYj->S5_5p0$IiFrb{oSPK~ z-yG|reou~=;thNwd8+8YUi=at4o40YJn#eFu27s(h>0z(S@t?y3$^L0H@2L!B^CkQ z9OEt=<`hY&WG$nFgX~iifME);_zgf`=!lL16fxHCSpo0~Rm(78IkFu}YprpOg)y zlAXk#tmb{QNI#%D?=QxT!ztY^%cN3FF2r=}C}+G19Ef=i{?8NEWTRNER-QPM2gbli zp~a*O_+>hTU#5p9923H3dCd}`d}>z=92rBi zl~Y-rgCVG$T)>^?q+wI6?}9xu6Wgb1Wi*OG&oB*c-cc+~^Sl}B zR$~ms)QQCz<}^Ixy8=_s*Iyme6vf#Q{uuSMsQRyFb@W-55{F~m0Ss@!TbU3kN(cx( zMntVH9H|A{-}TGB838CTl8JIB90YIh3Lm#?tg_}1Ub#C|8V}OU*|Fzo%UYxUR^s03 zNeHr|HTSlD4_4?;|M72rFci{@Jbt}VC{(X)B2q{9Z8~wtjt92H6H@%LkVf>Iyua!~ zjdO?aWm}D?&1sd#GquDp0J?H0@hVWGuC_~wElu#`#cT&JwsWjFVwswspVCC}e3}M&{rBR1CPb&iUPPM7Z4p#2+k(B;rdsNK@9Q=h9+cGvp%*Z20LfsoZ+M96rz{DlXMO`^geS=`{P;jf9 zXy=J}??yZ*Mac&2e2`{i18{7*>o2c7BrefZfQjZ@hc@2ZkQun*LrzIyF+dK{ds5$C zWz)HN$%^PaYAh|B1JGPtfm*1qrr8fJql1B-dq)AJmAqLsk+uz~tXOsaVy^gU$O3^n zn_g`BdyF5BV4XqxX++(qBt#ur5BUCB)1PWhWS^C3bY<=GO!v}vOcp&0+Ow)hgGbTX zuGyUHEWrdWmlyc^9gxX`s^%<7{`LNI1yJPTZd6G&++M`5M@pnpc*k)~0_=88Shk!T zSZj%J16QCnxK#$pJX>io|2)l`#vb`nuROeBj|)#;!8=|6h>A9+Qc`ksu!BcaaXWSP z>id+4Q*P5R8o0@aT$=XLrY_r+x8-J@fPIY*Pi7`5QIDxc%cQswJPG7z5dTmCbxENZ zZdxl#SISoqXFZ-4zl<`X<&KO@(|cH;abFjO_NII;*J27%BNKk%uD~s`H}ljj~oys=`F{ty>_hf=!y@$ zcoVt^A18o2MqJ8HY$$_~NSR}f?tha`Lyj#NLPbrnK*YRh*-LDm*JAg@@^0ebR6U?K zp(9%QOd?redR#%hHxWfGwwEuQ4B1&}VRDWC>L5l!Wx!62+j`0?$ao37Z@Y~A0r!l!lkePMZASh3m!ia4VM|;(d zXbhN(9n>h%yvUD50!y_k$wHDe+@V6$+tH*Rj_iIa4vpOOKeDp+Vh^K8e$*P_9q8P{X{klm|`rm}U znHRMot&+D7T7H5`ZhLru@%OFwa{!VboN=|q<*ui&Ob$sa)0o&70uet^zbaBHd*Hm% zqQJ0~pgZgY9Xe{BV-K<*(e|tMin!D+IEqjjC|uZU7tN?FpzsD3(aS$2EJc{=j>}DS zoO@L-2c?Xl#V;(zh7dX;xtp4(HTcR7n;B&-CX=DA+=(?gyO(sq3Z?4NfWg;j``g+J zKHIx~>8*fVT2;3I$)q+k3C8xhY~bTDo}Ta5o?Pa8zTU27Pup0##cWwGZ8nX& zHE->6R-rRQ9%P0xMht940E=3Kkzx4xz+8=ykYN3+jK==fOJY`UE2-5Dx8Ds?LLtYfQ~M(^+g%zGJ1vaIJBd>rtN)Hr@~}5ZN95YO=z^|^k!B;Rwx98 z4-ESLk;OlE_L&1yp==P;vQ(ZxJJf5uq-{8)Qq?q1ujVSiq+Ap8CyBCsGQ%D~al)RM zMB!@e>cEex{Mif*Ps{Z0{PeW`X}bwM4Av77;?D(epuR+x{D2)$Xtx%7-d_Kv-vMPquBT_;#_pY$oJFaq73a zC}jj0`fiT&&mhseLc879?I?_-J1OG`%94sG4AEveOlPlSDt>6=rYRY5B%jKNvyC({ zS+4iP!{5N%<9j=|kdy&=Z=cxrv2t(D9n3xCv_lCVsgUyC#=yC>-)nwAbS%$8@)&wa ztD#kBv1yNM*D>3T*)&eYz{@yZ?=*3sMq@LDJ`*1s^2JmU@@XGD^IgAT9>17}mb8<1 zB!c@dNfX^(rJIP|Bd4Bn zU}Lhx$5Sac7RQ+8=S1wwr|mmqc|exor=7M9ou5?rVph&TO(BQzqUysi_b?d=hBd68 z7JqMb46A)W0>O$9*Z(qAft}9;!MxC$FDGmzb8Ixw?&l2-Hs_r~r<~utX;SUcq*}40 z`y_Hok#be1;$&^lS%$pRtPYUtEY20hyWt!nddaefNj;QTNJ^eDf4Tn3hEpJ*_R_kU ziArkr5xxwKr^N~cu!pA-Ft#f(T`Qa2iExiMZ~;=`MHO%&{flN_Ku4}Y?xmgQC9%aD zxEPUr%}Wyix2Hgt=DGFdS#}EYyndb(lTQi|Qwd~MJygEI%GC!TiGDB+%VdDE-Ni1U zJ$)Bt{www@{g6-Fbz*@>>R!gc&|)M~NqWNSoq6C)Wu2xsSyhE>DbiezW-Pgv{>k%p zJ&(1`Gbjc)5|PBW?Qr-nh(*ovt#<|FY(`2}PA&qiizalVYL8VhQpAjfaz$j1%>q4B zisRaXIo^+TCLpTP_s)VIYR21%lD8t@bkuS<$NZOnW^CBFN}h?+fW(lds_9`aTW)4` z(GQNdc>I>M=kMrM-Aa2NDbc?>?fIX+n9&;DN|63Te9>J5=|6hw?f2gQCIsnriQm-- zzw`8ir*HEn|09kF1Brlj>=Gat`L!3h=XW>X-(_hJm6^a|%Jo?yTqQ=2`lvTw9X0)l=dvgLNQ(;PLvO#jwcunLQ>GnCs)eEkL{B85uA z8Y*>r{ET6}wt)-di%6(kF&QQnL#0gyLN;+&-7v#bq$V0c)0d-iIggU+*u-x#EX^Mo za$G+qt-s#LN9;8*RBZq`QWN5!rN-B8(nH$FLl;r^Rs{ccxR&ye*LTOV?zi~=aIQOh z$(&jYO)Sb7_5)o^r1a=HOUPD?VvB5^y!5Y;Z9+TUakx(`-Q1dv0)5C3z{r7(hGwKH zdiiWjGXD%|lGtC456>!ur_J-|XMmd{|pTc!Hfp)WEkiHUy`sbW4|?4X3J z!WZo5a((y`^#ZYL&oxoTNb$O%IG!Jjl;mr(RSJWeg$3tHB-tcLvlCxyI; zrO9N(U@yu2C$(NOQL;ofm7!3vY5fe9XR_4^yqhC@<@Mi$?2vQPo~tiIf|(*)-H z99Qj;QrzsH&$9Rmtjv`A;@W>z{d31l4?2VX+Fy+h-$T$B+-jV6%XZlx&*MK`Hthyi zPEDs=w_NAK^f2SvZ6+_{{Wdu(T=}Qy6ouX1XvTNw71(x_+-^1S+QX8aP-WtN=NhPX z7Z%{-=AWAvr>4Hk_MG#ePW7bP_zcd?eA|Wk(_AIB+b`wdr1P)b#GblP>nCI5XHb=q zjq$>9m*?1`-#4^bj=LOIz&PH5kcKw^2Xgf=Q@F{lcoBx6F)NV7u{N_2X#Ap(kof3I z$2Vfs>8V?T$k0-;rz{pqU)!;|*i^j^vWzyy%;6|Zimfn|I zVSv)=6nZ4}+>m!wOAeB50aK>bsPjLJiSj<55;*vV>j-y^c_B$P-0Am~!}QujTZWaqNL=z*Yz3 zXy2Y4{$X!TX2AX_!nO?OUwhqR(0wG9i#+_`2Ptc(;Z!N7ZKjxA%9709+Gzc~4=Yto z(IQI;`925jxfbq5MyGR6*W6!puM30@bU;~;J7Ru`sAE#z`#f%YHJD~E*!EiG`2rn} zatbF;+A-N|r)CL&Hu(bHzu_DoOd2U0J6Fe_%s`d}`X`O78`>KOpHm5R--?^7!QYK2 zDG^7_bKo&Erl*2)3dYi<#IEuLdP1y&OB8<5_S8iX(eN_$)-f2Z5+ESB0|83;ggr^d`LMj5tQ`;5EFziE=Ru4+;_aom~l zK3+L=2{}^quNpHgvEOFByaJQ2O2n)^W`hDca3Fj!S73?Tcd_Nc)FXbT%<3pgB*}m1 zn?(Y8GDKiHN_*;Ali36pKy=mEXDUnla!?Iykf*ZCtYw1Upbo_8GMJG#1(h>4_B#nz z#AG)k2Sr#}V`INjMUB|c4Ad5&QV?6xPo8o^t=&Rc+ZBt~IKy_S#279Du+k6MM=$t@ zK!De=wmz`*Qgb}lbVHvp$Z2d;Emup?N@EK_;1%dKwT?sK95|pDY$3vlxCfKQKpVet zPMM4op^KBxrnZql30=ySH}D>VbK-lM`r>kgD>6_QCx2UY=l@*Qm-1!LDk^7G;^s~t z_<8v@io6f54q)i?Z3msnBOE5y>a#_^XEBhv*+wf&2c3s@pD_5rZp^7u=;X_JT8mLcG z7oG@aR`_D)`@&&NXwg}{^LiIKy+^)AEg<<&1-;yI#JjecIm%EXrTUyKnPlivZJ@Ea zsK%8+R_x?^&=im8Xp_?3F{hwBACk1Lo)z^New<#f-O=J)zV@PFaRePC+M4k~2lXk) zhqyXeA(}WfF%j5vViI}P*hZTb+U@eRtb`4n*B~P#;*ctmzOL1?NK|)o1u;`X5#`rD z!Jn2Yg!i(;*{&#(#IN(R$c@qZakT@Ibl0>IcT=3O)rsz^alIG#GArlCs^y!{jrykgiw57nBH9UFyl<;|TuA4BhzHO<(;T)l*H@#7#w!J=mmzdZHj#;|>bP|u zjNZY^eGh?S9i{YPgni4@BEmV4>`7z5otDQD@5p@-Nbupbq^d609a#j??29f0&zzBc zx^L8!`o1vBOSGyucP<&>rft{dJV&YE&@RFBLQUu_Hq78cwWURUn;LLbZH8;tPaZt< znjxh&f#gr7){@;E5V>k@=DuZs$_c#G)v$rDAjc}o4AZ5Xgs)E6zd_af6Un(Q#%jZ6 zz4EyGx;9*FRaYyUhu5t1jVi*P#QaAtbp@y}a6H=kJ)c(>&9rRMTktw=%`WEH40%VZ zPf(HQX0LU?9_13MBCg0c; zC+b}7)TH(8Y$=B)+IZQgz0!gc;q?LVeyEXdw(aQ2Gkk#tZLhi-dlsO)9!F$Qoh5M_ zrWTNm800^kN&sO6ousm;-5IHQ+25!Nft}9`weq04C7q57Tx+iME&X|xO#SP1(2$MT`%zl>8%{>1nQ5s(>Et8x#Pl zh8RYXoXRZfhO^Zouw+~)PrJ!6%*&EHm&t@PWVm+!*dL3}tSEl(J1Zlv1QL&~RWbl&nZp5IgCT(bzY-XvlH~`>wxj>ap%CAn2 zUiS);-k41`Q*D$%dJvp7Looz7Rth;K(C^6&F?rR9$4ee?UPe8?UI`aF(oOc25yM`; zM0`Q2_Y?W)lDcE|&lQ1qp-ft0P4bE!&r&j^Gx+Z!&m|r(^)WdC-%C{*oAc&@ZF^2qyH3BdcDXEdt+FWI%R``f#k4V!<1sVn1 zA%^{;uK~rQ55ZehJ3e9Y2`a*%Gijr{@SL#< z?E1;|zdl)MEQw#h79cP_l+A@dR*z1Ni!LapK;HeL zCro!q|KKCiHRhKl6h%FVf}PwJ2G5Yay?xbWO{h-z8*JQZhE*3ob$2VI7{v#DFsjYDQ{hZ~hoFY3(v)i7@prIux#rH_oj zP4DU7M%CtV4u%)Oai@{9hW^$p_oy8n4hH_gs`_otJ`#~$D+IKDZp^Q>iUZoG_<|V~ zO@Z(5jFWtf+)&}N3M$$qA2Kw^!wI#N86^x0q*DQ`5EK6hP@xwQ&SoEyA%T1r!r*`| zDy_QWa^6&ANz@(7>7dpbvdxH{k-Av1!KFAdSEg^eK&Vhzw$?%iYrOtFJ6I^(D#(6~ zwvN;DFzWPQzAC)|QoXtbT*#i4Z*K91L8Y15l=!-!@9fes+(;6NFnH3m)R00y8CZ5D}s=hgzmkEN**%oVtn1OIvKV)?}}|*hHEq z6ldabNX|Ux40OkeDi^?uZzx@@ktY1$6LEb3Rf`H|o`mpY6|O*&?YTy<@XtNVLT~^0 zowu}qz`E(he0YMmMKv*H0ls2nczo88eea0t|8?GsT?-+RxxdJ9d8fg;TAf&|%dE(M zh|@#9Bx=ql(ksAvZ?;x;mp>)LT?Lf)2+&s?)8*%9AQRl#D`p_X?q_3)&Am_l3D#oY zQ{Ksj(9mgG1mCth9BAI+u*3#hJ<2qVII8wCg`Fp|xsNW^g6Uzan75%`vh#^mjf^}&Ix{AB zd27{zmJS8|Jazfuukj{)l2KYstcQ*6TrFb-mz137?_ahkMW;p~_zAAGDnT2yL3hUT7A*6$G z-v(3=;D5dfA?6OUDRRx}{6XQ5hzWCkQHbG9fyU-Sex?Ws+&ALG%PBgwu~lury8F`( z`=l+(rg4nKgc@hN&A;^9*S#wKaVkep0P;M{*{<#%9q}rv#F%CKI_QdX-j+J5M$|)W zv!_r7g#N^ozMPTCvn`jB-13ljI8V-;0{)s-YQOWfjE@?b)af5TdH-D*#`ZNCG$!OH z%_h~XikX<;-9q__^8tg%fdoxcF4bMcA7soIXNk+Tnx;9{l}=_-4Qik5Tt+lpFgeHl zA?^<@aB<33!IZNhSGHw4ZG?Ze?I`YS;1z<}s#L&egzG<#4Vh&*k9{y7gP3y0 z62(Vj)d0ymLoq7!&aI}5N-!DEZZN_=)hkqg6Cbmn08wnu&IjkKwxu()TAn+u-JI_9 zRDr6O^S3DBz1ve&FVe9Q1PsrI5tLRz+N{lTV{ckyO1UU<>sK@ixrHIHPdieHUg|>u zxvkzbrtG5rCAr+Z3}PIW(g|V8cg*w7pj+VIoa9!H{!c`=1Wl7XnUSM+=srX8l6)V6U<0P=OWzOW2h z4}Q(Z>SmA8G$c*Aa9tZmt#ELe4n58KP&xLob|fx__}!+2Kn)ja&jEn;2LJW%{)UP{ z{Yu4eXLtaWI@sMKY!E?Mg-TR2XW!eYL)tqRnt*l8g4M3|;KGbb;4(?GPuE(}JXIJIW82~@t&dlmkM2S(C3Oon;~-l(E;5Xt*DYug=o zoQiI%;M6;i6IVxINy)g-*K7F(5I1S=a9nnz%glD)x_%AarCM*^DIk@Hz9f5?wW%Ia zP*!PG>F}>|Jw$~1WX>_emyoN26zeNMFXw)T6yUX)0=4vCPSnQ%yEZv32jxGZtgqE( zG=c={@Qondc)vkxSscuA`@JN1yO^#dS`#brMd?*Mi1KqmCWXX*BoU*0)yz#}!9 zg8eB&b%BM7)?4;})CH|yiBMLTrBsZ*EG7{n`HD^9qPn}Lms_ghr@kPhZB$fdN*j*) z6a#7P$V9(hn`KkJtRaTCC=#T04Y?N-?W2?SVW6DaOXP5c#C)0=MxCMilUqIWDdWXo zvu53AYM0}0&Y`VG7gq>wvEcDH>Eh3mL7{AB9Ibg&Te5M>P$?#fwK8980NwQ|t8EPY}}R{F76?3Isi~(xGWz#;(d|NwX@9v}MYz zbnrHhAqcuD?>~OWs@Kb%lv7{2Vj!ZPA?b0T)<15oLU8#uH_rY*oEJ^wemIPL$b6$S zA_@2oo?06;hs8R@RL_uqB>D+BumY+t4$Z6CPFx_Sk%mwIRjH8%wUkWu05N!|x%?@0 zpNRG!O%|_vlYP(Gu`G*Uixf&W@WhWEKY8-gck;E`ul^YSR8~B0qdi%Ui&s#hv;ZhV zGeu6QVeS2<7oE`%?`P=!GRZ?)VLFPQr3w8T$qNnJ>7@W+WsK8KB8b=SoU$*-u$9w^ z0w?}IjGBB5V`CK49OR35uF!BO)kpySUaDf_lOn5pR6O4gcrx&WojExjndg~4SWH`s zcwEoJk9`4b=2bBr9?Zj2yN7ye`coM|-_dPkiBJ1dWVfSU7gpS7211~b+ogY3uy`RW zPzgvft4aD*u26* fAi@9LyE=eeSfFiL|0}vTd}% z?6?HEo%%bdV+6c8)7E;LBDm+qiS!2y=#{XWA?k0S`*In?dL;N2-~1)oYZl*pop?^x zQID1mfuKxwRW)tvJ|JJ*P9MWd!S9?;V!a2V$rk;fccf9rE&wfAYMi|+LreG+{*0Wr z@I*R%CsxKOol~0$l_C`8sdcO5_*s~xDUu*JY$pmkAR=C>TqGLJe;wt_ICEm11S4&26a%^I*!hpZ}>lYsH*3PpHlwoC91OsDYV)p?C*u?wM?u+w8uEcwu5dt@rSukB*L);(Mn9Juy%bV~YwkmO z<*XARkyU)>8+g8oW2X7~%mD0+=xv85yOy{_oLAP#*sQ}Z&6~{?9>9m6rCfYDurAPs zf1^hMk3QAei8!y+A4!E|)w5(MaqepL91Qj)3~zsHcoyEH04G}FqLjT;{r!9)?a}i` z#YgDPJUkrKueyKr8Ab7|D?U5(2c&a-ZPXsDd(sK+K>sxulyZe|WWvF+lcYql+Cb{(*``*JO`XU?RO5nomNL)B-- zdWC4b`t{MH=QPvp9P4HXJc5R^sfFB;?Y3^HNfBK?7wItDe{0fIJkT-FB`a6GG*tX+ z)+HwC+ITOetkL7u-ev{xANEI0`szUFvO!SL(Vry?oT;LSGJ6urPrup{LC7-132FTD zuF6~I#l|^Xg()dVB&fL!oZ{T40-49U1#&C3Nt8PHeCNjx{@fm35}u0qC>OR1a;leKd8H zN&BIn7&_61B#WL3p$Dly!l0|hpsRQ5&Ichv@S;)GJXuTx_%LF-EmILyv&VCl=c%ts z?aZsZdSb51b5-I2&)l(Rb6VO7`z*9W(?ki&F(Do!AI))AK+ zv0qUEwDML6K{5VYlrMfNkW+xuk0z2`aepa*L}bhOa@0} z=k()Qx2Arj9QD%r=1Yk}AzKQO^ww7G8sBXH>u!~49Yt_OZ1&JgWcj6>U9-BRBcybP z>v6cf-IYYZDLieYt8Qh=a*fAWgwS7!!9bO)Y#wzP78P_pi+Lg61`zeBeN zG8=p2ni!mA81s&0Hl@D_eLr&g5@@M43oq$Eiv zI~ST_u#P@_gu9;idb!U?{@&{1%Z9Z?x!tnj>XiU6wMn7QTGb5|D9eI8x#kZBrZx_h z_?NOR_?{sJu^leV6^(tJ>-619)hpx-k}-oKcxn|ecOWq4V`*daBd#vvp zf1$tF9y|L}J|`7z$8 zEjNBc{NWG(QlIMe{NWFO_^hjb_U_}KKKaArcYpempFMv6$&;V!yXoKggdbV|%HJPi z@qhg2{YUR{y7Zj>Lu2VrM!y*n^Yr2=Z@k|Zy$TNQh+5gn$SvJ3#(Vz$sp$7v^`kto zpEjb^0Ge7SLQH+x2hHL+b51x!wPg2#YeyBmfQMq}KqgjutB!7(3h@IHy_^8)DFE)_ z9~>DVhCo?O;zy?k;w*k7=jO%ht^Z^fuQxU0ui$7ih}#BJ$_&@i6szHre&o#jdN$n`U2{5@F-a+o2uNG2rzY7=Mg6K<3x0Hv z**m>yLkpJgE%&OUJwoi2DJ@otO1EY^huF4|E54j?^(PG^J!f4XNRj>Y>0!q->hY1|3|EU-+kTg{b%e5gwiRXD4`tW#^SKHZW_4p~*RumB zPQD9LI!dbO2(V){u@<+Qx;jHiZA4dQC8wo0wrwU1^vS-rLEv5NMMhII+#wlaLeCLT z7=aopNWzZ(KuC*7hR>hXDIC9G&D^|QkJ+$JQ}S%ZB6fK0@>ppk@Qov*a1sNe-Mn7j zi5uH8C#K};aw*699DPtS8;$gEXxUyW3$k43o+4hJ{3r^TRM9-=_L@bk&sbgEHgnwP zGi!J#mVNPysrusv=ox=wemT)Y%jQ~wPhE+Z9gRb+%Q&1<@>z6>&G4@DDO2S*jvvXb zX$+>ro}%3p=v9Kk$-0`Xj>k`a@;*PyKjTOp&x#k&I|hd7WlhS9uQmsP<^95+hJP%6 z-A&MQZ;OvX?pXVZPk+Pb;6R3zn6Wluo5t6R$9 zy!CeY{xEnPI5p0jn|NqBq}P6=ZOF1=0n3l{j=z-zy`c_+4vD{kgh1=lE4_(c`_BG` zgf*T0O1cBVMhlf1*|gne$<1V&hL~*fAgcg>X1zC#JPioPEX6rgQGV#Wuw(=<62%bF z>C`DB#*Wzf=_P6f6r+$N_yP$WN%Fmvihid}=Exgt=GsCh4>s&(^2kVovt`H`4DQWm~UElj=^nX+EVUaVZYEK2Eo%buS)e zZSjJ*kryFMX3K!MiymijqB=wmEmKGQ*UY{XW58WEHPp`%;jNx@)vKr_BB>uu3-S|3 z&d#@;uYNK9Pl{l`?DORBglKEj-)u{$+dgG$l`PXRvks$df@ZU=&;?<$UJ3V zwo8m^wPy~8HFEk)lizIDD5E(Oc0KDholo9<%J7Dk!6CH-67sdOKWL;jN~kLu5vECZ+IvvL#YASB>DzF`K;t|8HN)jf-?bS2Y)Zl`=bO z$uOBtQ0`HUF#+liMmV_P=3J{!8x^?Uu7FQ}`A+sTKN0zOS=%?P%0cvfWpiXXAAcl5 z>KjNyNImwBT;`EmK#7ih&g&$)idF#P4)acydwTU}nlU^Ny9giJF^B~ z?8b8`#iP=HKmwaSs|6giXGLOot`yz3pJCp~)aSP?2SY;Vrg*UAy>4w{CxZW?qGJ8f zjsd!lnIBZ`<4E7{<>o6*od9HFVhvmlQfurI*G^_~5p(F`D8nbNy2t5AjL;6{5@77g8z)`1{r;r^EHNRsId^~`@b|I%EJ-+6kXB*IcS*))!_MN9~;!Ar&| zNQ2zAJdZ=ZYg`Upzf@`3U=sh(u5#0@+^It~M8eKWP2C^ZRU&H>>%JgK`@pVH3?*yP zpe(N&M&t=h1|UZ1`T5ixzZ?CQ7~eyVrFE3Am}g{-{)%tm?75}$SCs)cCe7y$5gnU@ zny08y_@vC&osC;U{0%AbZFt&3BS4EjpcnV5KJ6&nrFrQyV24)4Cy$Cx+x3#|GPcA} z=3~eS?t%&HBGY>O6N+w5g%X@>Zp~kETBHepI~o^Y<4;`_2D@ zQ3xeq(T_!ZUoqTik(t~K*{e!(jKfvGm7pV*;%?afp^Ib5DGI24jrh1>R9iN>t@Otj z>DJ|RrB}RkNPNN6jnk6D8H#{zf;_CRjZa-u3MiIs$_m`ow7HBwVUA1IZo~`I#3Xh2 z_7y)-nXD9fAgCRWxzWv%_@(PkHZY=86-;B$d=4tksS8ddaK(%*XaoCm8f1vrunxU#&Z|HTSj1t&9nV zMZ#2Ard+v7IV09CEFn4I9^mz-HsxV>=Z2x1RtM*5Usc6Cv=(by2dA~xiHu&^Z#w_* z6d>^gRS22kMv3@{Ml&@w&_Y4k4=$z5O|or_Xnv@vlz&8WDTQXeP^fBD(dgnRIzxBj zLPf885DktQ89QTdwWUn99EBHOfW+oDK1GkZVE%a+qC879nRpWg^T4}*Z`^pL;AL98=&&u1{Ak<)q~b#{BrQc{e-I_2H$$-RA1+U>)AUc_=={J?FjqW}+bQZ6 zsDI8F8jM+Mpgm#&U~R!S`rsRS&kwLR)!n)UZQYt=4=fz3Bghg`aeRn#U1MH!t+DDT zxmsrhkL1D+`|WzNx%g@`Z}6%{O0ek7{S*t3C0Y;@zfh`3oIz8~QB{1$@`Uy4&Tc|P ztEjXdhy~)bs{R@wZwoFP)KY3L6EuUpOB70rt3pdZIq~B(%Z&ugaLhyZI=T=> zOO!3Ms?WNocQ5<-_HTUTJPFfd0OCYCY}EimK)k=xR&xOQ$(h3MhP|;~ocjzfBUFbd zXt45Unf_=~gNz0Bw}m`eFwMZf)G~wLMfk;Bc$nv_d?@^zmAsGL@?{-JHL9aKOimQX zo*ITFHugBZOM35x~FORh_j>C)RLaK?`KQ53FrF)FLZN*rFjr`npAS0kq5qa?uZL zR)OYRy;+vQ=TMxcww+rIcF7N}u{+?D7ndatW(K#Jnrm8%Frhd-^-r|GOEtc$S;<2^ z#f?3B)ay$Ci`Q8m9ZBWkTEkw-959s|#k566&8u!&8bV3?MW`WzoT2}q-4c+pjBPK| z4J5_b+6Q$OsB7+PG^y*&;f-|fx*yu*qX$n@@xBmWAiUhC=l&b_^F{fo4XFska_>T-Ru< zOjW_bMIl4x6j{GaHT2Y1+C_~0Ec5;0^xyyXpHE3=vH8JOkhw?2M-ygs@s6OeR!$Vt zxpdA1hx#g2%3bJBcd%U76EZcKi!dR%R_ii^Q$g3Qo%zK(hp``3L^qn3BLYvJ0vvs#Ys3;J#xE`KvpK9-@n0WRB3BZgObW@ODB^tQy~pbv{y8*OtclZ!f$Q2 zQCQRIyn7atx4YQn`0#mM9Kx~ermE)lvUfa9rD~2H^&)TZyT(}$bjmRGsk9SzMME1X z)vbljkH8qR^(SxXSUzMw<6F)pZq0<@u>Fkta@9#kBU`-B(>kHR-F7R0a*Vhl@+^43 z?k5L{!PCWSp3d{1XImoVZVhdI7$V_2$F7f^SvBRU{Y{Mzbww<&(tmq;kEetUff*f?s&(de;30_P}}0r|!nt;DJL% zJ&kn6J^01lBXHhtP+|CJ(APdiq54AQGHx;VD$hehmowl=L}4M@1#Zf*cPYflKTB>? z=D{S#PVK(=w^ZI`8*1lxWLG--pL@in#jdq4@=C+xB%~f&#$ev$J&5Sh9lI*kJP1IO zEZbdFLj(rHE|mWR=&}uNUyV8ek5f&>EKQK#`6FmBBVeCg!woPA4I_VxN0$nfGiC@3|+?VPu#7T`|>=PX-KsE!n0SRdt&U@+pC1?omj% zA^k_Ma)Ie1OBQg2XcM}5?58iq5+wPjDv=}f-Q;&8f5s1eqz;~go$mQ z{>xJ#tv^5~6P>1xoIOiIZ^mFcoXPC*Gv~Pkr>#tB8NhtPH0}aY~%Ta(L+h7c+ETlwVtNuf@3>_}VDuYTx#MT+~`Db@v~k>hot9Zll)?A<~Q2 z%RG{aRQ?F*izNihrmLtxRQ8k!glVY{qVWZtk5P@P_-HDvvue#Krm=1w70)EKvm`ES z!Uosn6{Max2d_8V24>oU`X?!HKH6K(3-_0{1-XH@Bwl)1KoJspy$|xbfgNWJVb@z1 zFQ@epd>rm%67r!a12f@A3YKf#uj_(oIA6t~UQ8l{$Kbzr==-uz+EY-s(9@k=oK}-> zV}A;M%~$inPxmKtQzQSE)eUx1)aP=aWsAyjU< zog*yk0}66CWxK}t6kA4B*^UB^%Ol{DG2M|`IiAo~F=rfoI3n#tRT zkn!q87JLwdziCXV&cTH8gpbC-yAjW64yO3E^UE%5`+nV_mnIbuc@Lp^50XAw#EE|7 zGDztuvCm)0pE$ASiw8F7?qrnqE3-XwO*eG@e{}+d-E=F04T#b*X|VIabnMY9V?pVc zbyyVTuC9>L zbTeHN1HJ}Tw^=ip`uP$H`Cl5`DDfX5u!MP0}fs<0-vP zB4cW`{$rFIIN4<#6CZLr>-dD1LyQf%WxH4p1aV>YuvJ`CrjGYBbc?^*(80U@Q}L^^ zZOgObBdp-K&@xv8XABM?0}f$Ok!`u!ay*jC=02Pq*F6(O^m}kxtM#waxBV^hQSi6@ z@wH>Gbj?6l$SIMThp*${|wM74TG;5cjm31ap%*<+&& z;8~5UKDClK0+y_uY2{TD3yQyj_cL(0nAfnt!j}Y%jj5 z&UoI|<2-}#Ti<8RF!#Zue#VI|KzcLNp*X0FvQd*x2p4nihGYk4G7YFqcz@Fw8{sad zsn^I)aO)Y71s6F<7hBz$#D3R@>aNY~*tJ0~FL5?FT5WS}_}a5p=$8HooodZ^`qb7; z$rp(O)eede{>Kga0@OcH5i(T{9ioRtnq8wy`#Hr&L-kbh4_0-m{8@9>fHuQ6h+aW* zIDUZH>$BanA&9WCP2{uUb}%wxF7H)I%j*VxnP4axBvG;O&rCge!3UY{u>EL)MXDF4 zJ#T-%{4R9$-b*?C4WM#+wGY^5@EcrcfLQr3)f=^4UV_ho^6wsnh+lI{p@?4tDFcz| zuFp!zzeOvqx9P3r=)H=Ucxb^+w7=*?W-|`veMs23jLO83rfa&BdPFKT1-(;|2Qv?( zNZ@^5Ci6VBaj)zv!a1f=GRdsvhOX>TQs$oV*Pp_6AoC>KL-hFl3%iEBKXOK&2Ds|r z&}Jzt!hy+>?*FAYX@Zwz`qy&SaIl!Sykk9au9>IS{X`|DZ*2k?625`ZB8<0_Iq!Z; z^w4e4dlR)UIb>Dr>1-Sg9s>*(FNx|AjXBK?l28cETMRI(2}ijcY!AIqXL|yv%g%42 zAwWH0ctnz(Ux=*T$iE$ca(dj}8oZ5=R*q%B^SWbKSrIe?VP!|rffo&HcD7g2w(}K@ zc;_ncdE2{J+2<7Husu6}lZa$kl&kHy)R&V_9WeI9_vXYO2FLoW&rN$y*u@E=GNr~YBfu7(U7kC9j zWH;@4U#!RnJ5l{WJmd%pID+S?DOECn+}sN{!^!5{I{sz zl`9rrx};Ut`&Hih8<~s_f7wk{IW;54hnQF8trDxSq&Pg~%Y0I3$^{PB{b@LIOe9DKUfm)j#VvcaQj&?ggFn~^*3HUflrz)^ z&GZ7N2L>qraREfe5BcraIilx7E zs(YxWoYrU%w_l?Ek-XN0jYfv7n@ips3A3-5M|Rlhoa1vl!8;G#fl)Fy>&sJ^)n^Mr z7Ai55ZlwZ{pF7fN2pvd(F&fP0>_HjG`Ss5$@-po@sIWUsI9)wu5_9tFqG}IK&<@r< zQO4a=H68C5cYEJESSVStxD)KHI0T=f%&UIT7N8&3O*tbb1+H^IFR83z-yM5^FgtGO z|B;+Cq=jb*#ZS2oihD6ov{*ne`XV5=GTB?!J}_};3g{)QD*MGgdT3x=^WS6z+7{)e zW7lC{eY%+`B8cu{Ba_40fHG)QI1K-vK~nL27%#rWhXnjHUq&v2YvHX7$}Lcfmb$N; zwt6z6D9j9o#SyBLs%(X;T$JcI2})KC3~{#F`QrEevcVEYFq!7w{-Ibi!;%_8N2e{= z|89vI61_@D+nmb5j93%s0yx2Z5L`Lof24+r+3u19$Y|U3xeD@(7k1j0d6UkJS64P` zgqpKWKBL{xK2;ET^f{M2vz14s$!{nxXvo2}=5{7Q6W$1;D1_v>`;9peocbRP@-^E{ zqqKev;UOXn$36OI-A|m|AW1nrP!RUc2eFI%o%5+rT|6uMRX3tr^zj+hQ_8k@?xSM! z9Z~S<`#%TO4lZQqg)vE1v*a7vQS(;Hd+)ycM1krX)-b9^CV6#;wIpk5b)<9%h4u2N zj_@UDI`{sj)V5clrmV4|45x0gf!N>Qxz$uRgZ6UBeqKeYvulYE@Q>v{|5TAQqg+N? ziBG5WZiaw#Rxb#WsVFB8G8oJZ%8_t8OV3-<8N;juA4|^>%ns4*@aGYfks1TgI1DPN z`n&&WqdCdI^|VG*JI1pyqIwmuE;|=>&PID^LMFa&?!Xf*@gQ4Q_C8aNsC5#UKxDuN%+pN@Mf+Q*SD_1^Ea=ZF65m{e>$VU!EDP~wg z)4v1+GxzhHvkB4=TK4(qpRw6uPWcKRZTVE4YS9nb2;^Dikm)t0@@zNH=kMRlf>(Hz zyWAeYE8hXf!$T5!Ip=yG+q32r+ifG=ZmCli044S1P#elK>9lHxk*m0E%0U(W#ivH+ zt=d>44+!}~Qb}Vh?Ly&@jeqI;q_9Ha+L# z0@iFxA2e64wvo}a6nL5Ps?!Nuo&!B8EWi0nNR<4;`R5X%h5o!OzWJI_h?VX9MW)2c zTCi;7m1(E<%2(^~i+xV~hOnXgvy0cpBhwSx=gkV?mJnK98@7Z39MT$@>fA&T$*Vew~zO8X|x z(1ZAmR_Ly%m;*C;%IAc>xoZb3P#Xq|{v#G>vmZe<+^0AC8B(uKRmp>bJ=!Uh=o%?g zREN(z|4DJ`S|=((1Gig4-%)u1F7+;k=np@(-ITK2N+0?-%!b02qEl>hu})$^cDtQ~ z5{9<7W^H_T8Y-7{wo)9?v}N;i#tsIxc{*Y+;RV6lb1T^yb_skh2o*zSF6_&4 zImItPr|nz04}<1h{L}NlDz&y)C-^6Er6OYx%4@oFAhnZU%{T8LYzIa;(ae~wr(xEI zb)m1cuvgiznr)_fSMLAZ-(eW$OzILvt+9$Z*1aR@92WV2O3~@S*A`efPse7U-4IGR z2{~bPJyxBLS;Pm#H*R0q8eRSU#-_}i7JTidThUEE(7Z6Pfq||6#f2GOy$J&S zsQ8VDTg~L75Ul)Nk@i9McKZIOX(MzPZGQsoxQ5onL)8M3?@nS`Z1paJCuPGd3oki% z`4zhu3pk!G2tjel@nQ2Bt3R%+9)UBY z*DEF!m8$ltxmunAlm2-G z@JFW5l~W2Pmhk%Xk)jXtE5N3B^h%=G^P5Sox?ne?)gSo$ZtSX#f`l)^o5lh+J%S{W zRk16o*fls$>Kk~@hrTP%l^3nM0WjAR$S4=*c=sn-eq^$U1zM|5-z2Yj{|0PVl6?X? zB4aUeNewRS@0oyG1j<)Umj|t{jhZ&-Z6T-0D6LrQRBzpvK0nE%Q(;#OV(eJo&NWkL zHTMNunRGjsTthE*m=5Bi@$Emxk%Q^)X9htjmA;(JpR>=&;^Hu67^YqZ5;7o@)12X_ zHoFLPaJ4<`E3<0`O?lES`3PE0t?Em?T1`kcm!(>QL`YzwkO+>7J*H7+{>YAbqNfvE z{iuzy-Jy0~>-wrig_Zriddb>Z>Dc?C%5ZSMB=qxgS_4t}Hfk=zUVAda?^9zc?Mk{h zx*G@yRBn=dfrh)YMjo1V{-m1*#d;caXRl}eFl1bQ{w5ihpTCWai~i&-H<@j#{h4Db z z7h-tm$ba(}ae`P0W^h4>u95qEPKPu<{I-8Yz>RO-`FSj`EPMH{HXXRWVhhT?CvO->pI}W z6$mdnOD3qUoPA-HAhM*SS}^{hNy~cc`J5=5A3OwldgCwAZq_2&FvdAY@;=EWCRI z)l2hT8}z6I7U4jtF9~UI=rZ=I(8|qp`9*s;DP7#LcRCDaSF?UqH50*NODEkA+z6{? z@rv9@4|zA@J=#s8KI6FF_DzWC7$1T)cm@#c++MWsHo?Lr-4FbYl%X;xc?3b1oYA0tD=`j~~{sbTQ>D z0g?-{Mx~Qj5%dW#wE@yz{qz8}u_^ zZq$r!+o-?fY156PygJ_q1Dm95{Z3e0SzN9<9Zf85CdTY&xOezlci(}Pd%)o>n-XqY z@+&acP~ly?#&i(4-_5e2Y6}VrzaNNMql7y|=OvL`mOeIZQ9)Enq}+7mS*dGUfN%~8 zhEssTD)qpG2*=~DoJO$V43SS#u$8{RVZw5<2X+KeGDL~mWNQ}Mupppw=wyyT*_Ha0 z&%fdvF6Zo%2^VES%^?hsZW!xIqX!SH?r23kH}2Hd4=-PJ{vM!3r^|clnz6^?_%N{S zrzjsssT>rdd7{3}b0^Y4^G2?#TUHoTN{G!2Hi0;AK^N9JY~LcBgw#ItDd$8&n$4Mk01L>m2N5tCKOGT226Tv zOD;6)E$#JW(vy(cpdE*D!%lnZTT2uUG6BXo_YblgyK|s#i4dl+$^A)uK5ayBjkG_K zaM){UW_VMdjVK~F0~9E=K6&> zHI{5JBm!Vxv$!jzP*n3@H``1lW0!R=m@!hum;>yb3kq?rZ%zi5H$;t=HK}^sMC>GqT zQLvp{1(CYTM}CO4wn(CdphLryZJ6;ScTE^LCWTR*qHeN*(4;ZHp04T`2YS^j{0{Ss zWzS=Q&)I9J`O`1 zNLCvoJa3>rwPs%IcIf({FrNnet7hUb)a7&+qX1AC3H$=Adu&lW^nSVf8e*h%fAbJ= z*81PS8Cmv8{#-B?k=P)rHOchPUvp#PSy5ukw0xbqd74*ho(%d^=Fa6Ln>E`yB}L+X zS)C^<&U&>`{3bT*9^hqSHeJQJ>3nW<=$x57?8sv=7OPG~1RW#P^uWts%!QVcVQ($1 z3n`7r!oZina6nx7vs#-Aw@yJ!g2hdGubDM+=IbXt$@xXl;x(6#(Xr(eW=Dk1EW_aK zNQ{XO7gyx#xvugi>_$u^vSdnwiS7FlBNRUTF&vwvUgry)!rJ}Wz&3oXk5mcD9qjbTo6 z@z-2KXA=}K-N;f5Jxu;Cza2t&<5-7VVJ?n#FFT({*-4eptizUR=Tw-Y5t3rvvok3& zx3*fB<{;8a$k)9lax8S9GnEIKFA`#lK7Z-@m9krM0srz}Dh9r5E%@%{%pli!VC~|F zMc1YXV?IM{*4)B$L5*S8yDE5K3h=9lMlIq@?H|sIKTlb5kBrUpz$1x`sa7jt4#oU$ ziijvkOR$$qnI$So6(C0(mhTBhDE2v9GwT@?P@x?iWGK>EQ9`yPV;vxbt!p_Kq+(xI zmT+MH2wv2{T8E}NN(%_BkwN~cN{K^Y6a^n};W3G%B-FQBpZG8Krxta)Hx;$&X@yzD zs4vk`!2JnQA5H%97LrF@@-h)|VWWqVOSiG~%kI)n-8iE9$MnIWq&2a^Cw zwJu^xSH>^>8N+B5Ov=@}AyqS=sj9`jcp>PXV%SE_ zus({LL`Lclwpo&fdO_K?GzkfOQ=(dXO(Nk3P}L?vkuR5qM_mBP8t_{4B<=+H3C0^% z6yn^Xs?!*1G^TR@k((^IsZcA?Lc7>`h2TLc!ft>DIiToc7$QuKm6#Ty4Ik}%cH zg73h{x_k6kd{zt2(}qgjtL*&JSu2SePlhk435+j$mb_>rjlEk=?To}5$-P9OD_n3` z%zUqAgHGv5F{MW^2(CC$tKj1G(r;to-(J(SVDnB&g z5eruz`yNljqvCgy8-f^DIS8z?oanKJVNy;J`Z9qWu%`u3cuc()R9aq1HW1S9d`V{` zWbRElg6u6u!g5?>#yd*q5DE!DfY|h*n8(Tx%Ri&q<&LugFc@r?s7ctCy|1Beu&DuP zAUbZ-t%3vKGf__ISH(@bAP0tO`%knc7cZMM52h$hC&sV}G%-Unh41wp=w$U^PY8%A+lXI5~QD#{Mf$)NFu#Y}UYpXgf*ANW6O-#r)D^$VQRXg&)oWoyQS7|*83nrI?(fQro4u5oL%6@$2N(`wwS>LzbbO+(F|3(P>pA16apNfymts8MH9NG^0 znhp4)$4{O-c_(L%+(h<%3ZJ7n8mKfu$RIopGJ0lz-L)Xjvm}~1Kw>|S(&#|Y8Q8hc zvVfm9IY+_c#h2?|Gzg3p)Lg91mb*Ag{ z4C#I=qf|K=*3$0%jsGy`#V`AE_|AGA>HEB>N-oGL#e>}qy7}pEQA5NB9RIt(U%(Ae zPB`sE2M%P~RHYQ=;G=+Ak)VPJl6}^w)`ql9@O=1RQ?|p^IP|&`43wed=+{APapO}H z#v=?z?G#vnI7BY~V-!UX!`POWL(5%09iN%HCEbeWee%roj-$TW_tqB8fz~&V&!LV| zf2;E$aURaAZYcAU%$Noy#+%IwU1U2GwGn{@+=B7A;&QY1vlCh<=b^4IzM~Gf4^uk6NNbecJfYjPp4FyyBsK7vqNy75*mS zvE)s{r;aM(Ih7@nNWAT+t`xdX^((R=cl8_!mD5x&gRkq=Z#)}G<+xH+Ggb>b>oaA1 zYDd;TqIKD0{yhpo*WdNipn|FSe$JGOL@b|{pm42wQ(zhOOjrRq+;3bPtoj1xW|7w` zqbj$G6!vHCFfBKzA}`7IadKESgS+$6T?$m+L8{L!u8K4t7`D%Q7&mCbu{B7&ARPGez z5TSX(u+IiKwT<<0v-Zr4#fy!Ey20@n8FaWbo(a+hlIIlRMk-o!wq7}X;l=Bhm_t`1 zU+{r6U(~)WXm}0~#*wL3Uv3cwz_b`fna+>g(3_4);0M=%0SdQnyPoe7x*zK7vgYrl zYT>k(S&D}Bj<#}mw#n8JMVY#EDtq7oYr9YD{t$GmdMO$C|QTL!}{PjOU^1 zZt9%?modk}zcTi1F$80WP}HTQFio0TsyVS8gJ$f|Rj$m{4uB|`Ho<(JyD59Wax_C1 z5_`W98C!%Qlg?5Ow7yJ)2vB z{89Hdy7}1MG}}-2eajcfaq9SK^2 zgGJ;_Eh0sJak;t|ZeyM@9(YUDG6xXTKEy)5IiORz=kIfW9yDX&Hwp-ejhyMYj=>ty*r&fl?aizdH;+~M~bWna>f4gFcDz2JYk)g>z@=nwS3yWgM3>3OY;hIm_pggA?R z>;ZG7&f4N3s36MB+ckwMAi{$$P>QWLDP!ke^vnHtJ zRB?_zhbn};K%NLT8RZzLTmOug>x08nRH9ItNCW4Jo2eD$qF#l=d~G&5yPpB*aDSef zD}9||BXRL%Q{R>p*xw)w{(FSHOm< zKzbzL>ZcTYpCXp%v>|f&qioYTe|GL%FLXC%vG`GAn1r&DpClnUiazIAz*+sEu9oB& zLi>g8OBIfBM@t9I7frALiMq?$J^*?2%UvBL*YExVd+27(%_(|@@IZD3v%0qIarvhU zvJf_o0#Vo_Z8sF>wICahp6|TP9eN`tBg49>vB{lSkK100P(SNVLQCRAowz{^uOYnD znzV)Z^c*K=y+`e_MD+(~`Ol}$%}U7`C6QH|kCq4-GU&l`ny>JPlLicqsT#8;^og7; zfB#SEzgm>7zn(Jysmp`Q!t)KnC|fyADO=CSQdMT8-4H*>7^t|65RF z8?8u?i8}P>v534+AK#OUFHUGAqf=U8acxNeC_?>dihAK2I<8)*Tew0I^x@uTa~-Rg zPc$iJa><7Ct@nHtvTZ@AivYedlN`>oCcnJ+dOVRn7Cf5D9`@;{`b|WZ8K|%!PrGd5 zOH4Pq>1Y_GI0fk`7r!ipJ6|B)FCuOvpe2zB=j&}=y#)MJVGG>I%|Fx zl)ELbtV$v`<_d8B<4EKZak_yBYfzdev}W!4>!x=6emdQqt$8*MDc=3mT0U=3zR!`b z$RL=E#!L;2I6I9ZIdkyZ!BjIZn|QD4R36a0Ich|iz@=ex)hdtSDtdocf?u``|g}gD2hsd}VfkE8GgmLU! zKK<8HL1cW%k*?f0WGV+up}1BRs#BD}Ii&)^!`6xFX+Hb2`K1Rlbq&#aW2~8^HVRk$ znm=E+mHa7KqCKxS?9)0fbX z!XXWCMXO+HIreTjvEpoGl>1*7oR<3M8KxOO*yc49e9rKIY?#F$|1mQas4=A44oO;? zTjiIwpFTv3VwTzi1h4m2j_);5{)6i8Qi-*OJG2r>>Q)TAGeuxuSNMM#(kLfuyYh!t z?_@Nif(NFkiax&!T5hhLL{A>nnSN96r_WI@VX!|?38Akbd1qv|4CkF4p2Wbcx`aiC z*tzwYn7<+``Th@|!P=jv|JVMkoQ(y~jGl#nYb`T}WPg@BCh50RRC1|LlEBZzRce?q8|Z#SBnv zNV0`{Jp)LPTVq&8+nQ@h*Xv|fu$Yak%u+rGwpO#Xx8B--;Ej4Lz}{%5-4OmG`Xx8M z@0=46nIyYgGvwi8X4TDNu_`k%9_R5r?uCyCo8Edvjn*4tTcfB{QAh zqVY#Bk;TW1b-;*Dw!uLNfOn^V7iFD z#KR05b)0o0iXeJwa8;-m1bwFmu%3hb6mPZ~))kJ&ocz415<{Klm;D@r&98p@Ng@QG zTk%kfjSQ5Y^nhG+uKVE#gjURW6ouEa`O@u==ll`)O97c!(#IS4@Hlk0J~# zJqVFLu;)nkxSAR$QbD}vSwBL8fTo%WtYW>z;AeN|1`-hAEetBmH;kCwAZBG+;vz^| z{T1;HFRMea98Mk{gz_Md%jQu3rfMJKT3^uU%w+Tq2KAez6nD8MXQeHfX?JQarS29T zecV=sI;|(b41(neXS}D?0#WEW0AK;gujV4%ajAr=Utzo&@zF%rplzFdB4&hXS${Dl z<-+IHhlKAwKozYHf&ILCi<(KQ9AQk7N5{9pr{d-Z^7G-|Wy%UIF$&qn4Jv@TEe`N$4X+;7EbM*2VB`pQ+&1?9uk%uRmCQJ&A_T4Q$~ zc5K%AB?w->W0nxqL@>0+oG7ysF$^|%83aMlAWdhk+wnI9M9-?}M-1GMyfdjiZ+5~Y z+W_dNIrXu*dRt41U39=Yq~z!(7@kUV_W+aUeg^z5sPzo>WRG#{lF#_9hz8aTY28kb zBlkiSV&yjO==M8e55i?UFqr*9?6QZ240tRtSRW1eg&w^mw|;|A4Rxt`NNmeSbwanL zdPGj~zqJvVC6AILQ}^ra3^582Bw}atusi8v2tbTt>a(GoS~oJ|T!0I#7*9GC3XZwoeh$MRU>~Jc2Z`E`{c#4~Be2a( zERjf*kP)t7;%Gu6bfr<=_{dL7NIbeKpycUL8ni7z$qO$yqV4=Y>+AyOB<{sNc@-Ryuci4Z5jFHX#K8n zi9tM21G=SL;cr$vv$V>QL>v=f-oHFV)vdy>9>sBIb z-^ocG=nsuzdv!c=Th4C~n8Fic6aGCiGFc!Aj+;_0QFNHs0H8`tCF+=vzT?jIzcg`MxIej#hwQ`b)UaXqW{}U8oG- zf>#zOGwh@l1TvZ=Db*N`lkD!ap1=Ct%mJJo$@wsv0AFC~$rpfHhK;QNg2!33BroWN z%@%it?D7{ zPv0tD-)-EV+-VlUc{!RK0SXVJzal{c?VGJ@hmDe4IMMlJL!hCIYCMAq72vq>gVX4i z>|Y-xXYVTIez1T~>$fTHFXsLneb03MonL5fn)O zkM@u8A3o=CGk4psoFIO0B6|zSa zK>yIFrfPbsoSeR2)QKhev_#H)Yl4^F$X&wul^H?eAeGyaCTA?D7#=x*-Yhn zwEX_V>rtxI{P274Q>poj4^XN3p?&d(O<$X^>$s{=sreaXYO=MZ9K9N9mQ3UH_!C<4 zn}-yC{sOx>__*5ze1n;{8sKrwifdm`1(w{JjN_<|+Mr~gG_58&)3oYg^3!|$?CZw0 zizg6+{WB4gI@bm5MGbtZ7($sCfd9wknv`imS7>(OW=^nBw-4g|8xzI>Ma?>S{L(u+ zB}@;R4Lph}galummyICZA!##Pb)4M3wjE>=De`|L5>vI%a2$(etBI{`?S-T-o?bEG zwJler&L~eAC58YJ$!HIAVe0J)XiPTMlw*%;AC%6tLzS|6I^`+X;xpSM{C69QMbE;{ z#IZTdt)usY-`!SgU%PzI#~4FawHwIQak{rFg+{EkL=(ais1UNMfaQ+IOm+2N@z8rZ zWtNwOBgAcw#7cE*>t-zO<9XBeV;}zsxw9%doyfNO18(_)pT#$4v}6B`DFmNHiBjWfq#APq8^CE|^v8E>URq~jVr2%JDJi)E{LJ^PN%*U1C|0)vM@)fcy8?DoB5 z1}^3p)6AW#rrku^x7a{HRbn1X>Z;GE{Jb;ERXN~?Mj`qO_b4M~kg+zz>pK;#Zt=X40jyvNGNV!+D=k^xViTTN7spqL9+r;RA`?V1?=?dJ~^ioWG2WZjDaHfPA( z#+~Z#=C~5iH-9}(Z5Y0R+EO`Me=}5+gg)E+Q+2!E!u!YJqaS?ldw=z@fG?RKjM*k` zv=Yw98IWRiZ5tZ$bEkf^N)6x5)>B*>q|1(@wINKe6bU8MYv}F8YoHb#erUs`74gRS zr*FEcx@3@~w$6=@JMtYjB9}a2*~c2w30c<3XkN=wbVC-LZaSYlnb7d3SP7?Sran;F zJ3s$}QX&4(?_@(87e1<@5T7)lh>fO|OJ0FMdH^nc*6dZ$i;`b)qU<31zS5!@ zfvQ(7=G7l3QM!zgBNQLQWk1CIEuLB9O{cI;?X}fsI+)u0FT4m)iFOSdSglHZP*~D(nFy1){Zm|&JJnQz@%rwO*weK0XwJ9kIO+%n%&?Od)) zGv~A?v`zfDcyu4|C;LW(dqq3$ejKcy&umy(y1PC8eSBI6Htwt@%x=^@aHoMq>vp+k zD;Dik=rWU(UEG9*J#~+ou8ILOkuLFkY(!B_q=tt^Aux3{q+atmMy)=t4#%go@yEFO zp|<^pD10qLBPRAC$#|#YD6I^E$8TEl3&wCbZG~Sj4bABsXU63=#>3SVG!({PFrW(a zr65`SR?y9N+OQU6TjB#f;>Xf0>{w@oihU1ugIihbEHqlPkS_C_l1#Vlm3jVd)zZ3N zR-yC>JgQLP0aqnSNR!4Qq{tc>AaZR&8LQT-asMh7A+hWuuyU=f z%qKktPbyGI)E+@lUMPZcYepLOE4gge;BWXX0SpH-K8_#K3ig`sNv#eRaSIeTw&`90 z%TFhwh|5%9;8Z_tdvZ4^IK7szMxbG^?6*=`8j^Q6=Zn91cv z)Armr^cjN$;lQvTRBdtxpPc3tn&i@TX-272XwB-@n&}jG_N)JxWJ7x`01UC8K;tED z2hHKwChnKp_lKf0v|s&kP@rkK-eaW z^0fV4Dq`BHC<0|?T`6HDGL)CJFLj`;_ypnN-Rv}=4vjG1SnPp%VF0&=7PLh$EGtKO zH(}MMegSCXhImj`)Z|{eMpzWi&LEj|CW~;??Nj^~>-C0l568#-s6WJL`|-#+xLK&( zR#W75JT)CmAfe<~TS;-@nv4w&E*EbHX;`F|0M$H-?by||Taq@+)Z7~YMp&4_bs^fT zq(k2&1Z_DpoRU-kWlWklrl8aBj1UFf`#dRbtJIgO7cRHkEu{vH0gIVHIeRksS&I{7 zQ3hK+w8&LR;z4rlD%O)sNubN189+>^8Q%(MV-CPcEYg{ru(JFX*dQB)XcylU!{wH2 z%5iHZ&V5|M2n6q};?&o5?3L4I@cm@Nz&APi?g?74KLBVmzJV$t#tD*)2HVQjHbI*sf+&JcL~@ z$}abP5Z=B!=B5dnOycxXU<9>;O1OJ|Mqk zB03a>K%2|JK&i*=?sIl-P4e$Fc9Ne>F*pZ^le)!iHRoK62=Fj+&Cih;ZYg|`+ICI0 z7Ote15nrNC98$;le-o+uP({3V9+|gGX^mMpSGannr8Q=f16wpgTcE{&iH6tJjFQ`u z8kif8sWtMV5K&`C>jt4L4ed)Bp;l_EO(J$|S!{}-65;e?(Ha7ymQ>%OH#p|z;GbRI zb(YEd^XFAQGj9~s`#!$tU4nW){18FC@9QOg*vhbLUd{gh7vht^>M!^?>^j9|Izz>l zl30@3iiy)jvv1mJZQ=B_LX2-Ru=lbfDOQUeC9YSd@E4O<18+zI#jb{OIUPRlInq@)^qdai_Op4k*%U$ zG$~ITDBVCWv@D`ivchf8%#-C1x2Z$b2ALT~lJ^O#1PXJnp`zvY?v>>io0sQRJqsQ) zkcSi#rcE>UYHCZlw~>)0VHwi7gA{Z#Qe$=QWG~L@r150xWCEVW(=FbRtGeuWk(RWu zvV^VGM6=7)^C}kJ{QdX6Pu)HZxPBkcM6fe9%>z{%=6?RXX2N$(kkXK1rYB{ozgT?w>;OADB-izo-F+fl2KlH`wh{$ihf9$kV%iYgioGRVZ;pJ%_TAD>#6`$ zK&!vpn$)LK5_P#0>`_b8&W@!tl6nPm>Kb`)T3alev+Z&0esT*d= zaUY+WW7{Z}zmP2Jq>OYyqghzIHd%fJ&Zp#_oEGl!4jr2)ePe#!^?83hx<%_^T7sI-{vf@;R?Xg9 zDTIhcHc@Br%N)g05tj#bw|B8@pBPd5oom`FO?)bMP3 z90U*k4DZ}Cgr(wPqo6a0Gdzm9dgsOsLw_0rBXA(Aq;?INxPszIbyn+mX`kY*bB8Ar zoxY+@O&yje#nK8;NFQUfE6DLsyPd3bFO5oC;z)q1?^w`k{bswwbG-oQ0IrMS-@QKX z+a|v2T?aa>Pn4S3mAr@ilmM~pynwXMHxHeXgQP|An>8Cy!SMr*XGx;yzZjx|UocagnTAwB<5)^^W(*t&&a-tZ3yO z`E{7DS^uWzW;~v!v%$W+q4SHPOx3cG2XHInj|_AaXTp6o?83-7 zHS~w8x06V&o16fVAP?5#lvcWL<~B;mKxKVL$00i!& zl$*FctVcmYk~ju-A|owG{ag?m$R72I>tqVvh*~PI+K3Z;aK-Zzx_6Z)^UVmL@}mwA z_iC0)Vu=M(1vzZH-(*_+YB8_{jbkNBQC?hfzznTt>R8MLxz0kP{_!2iPK75R8^WMx zD(k=`<*Y;99oV0p0f^il*`Xhf=lwo(S8vB+0ig?FCcIu%S;QuTMf^J|vP_{icCFut z%&Pk*C9Y#No%c|c3-&@PMeXLHHrj{FsZvEunkpKhCf1$}rgw}Iu8M8h!lc|w?F*!GjUji}g}=yW zm4-5+aSK*hyIQDW?)$D8^>;>mO?^~mHln53gspK#iK_6VVaAQ~5ZE$-CB5yHxZD(Y z;ljIKyb!e1_%+$qKagv>k!}6`^t*4)w!Xek-^ii1>9wz`WCbj3Ot}sr zKhw0D;bA6?h2(JjejcuY&b@qCUSj!-eZ-5wb5MkQ!eRmzI%>e_c{LP z7c$y$t(Yc#)5b`1u#Rgp4D(SKR+q;Xs$^NV)#QgZCf8w4d}JXF;VF6f)kP(=y?BPe z7Au)KXe59$h1NA9uZawJhUBHTN<>2hwZGIbi7%Q9MEP2A7JakW_gg(DZYh$k*W!B8 z#N`+dCb+>OFwh?F5cYUZ)OolF)x1?r{7%H}L8J-CX%_jj1C2Zs0VUdm%yZfv>c`Zb zPjd5ls(l}u!Vlu+pFUM=jEq1eI(m~-76;MQ+v@AYf!!Vs`ysY_XK zCpl~`;G4pK`f$qSgFn)Z%IrPD5zm2Tj`}|o%lB}n_4b;*n~w02oQ9B6N8t(=f$|vI zUPXCUUQb$XQZ+1QV! z$MdG`$3Fg3%o&23L$@L=a)+YzC}I;Hg9Uan9y-%`zw6a8MPu4s9N$W7+C^yl4+@%E zp0)8CyC#q?M9$9f*bkGjW3Rn6J6JN)jyq*M2I1FfRJdDiZd1X2lAwk9JjBHzQ$}^x zOw7F7nfy`;+%_LsIZ6&&ehLhM0)G@O8rg^+B{{J&*lt>|Kl;-b|E_cFA%{bP#T4ze zsWwG97#{h`e2G814$hsoS^nX}rr+I+s&vw0Pz*sw92C~_de<1<=QR4}wW}ylfS}Lm0GBUB)JgA!f}Xo-<)l zSjUm}o6SE~T`d5CPkA(6lL4LjDGBb3BqsIA>5QN73R&1Be;%jRSsN}10#-V0Mv#oz zKy-0d@>Bk%pW}D7`Z$5nx{MpNjIcvE4dnm3PA_GxDjVCd>Pr*k^o)4FHjPanIWx8SC=UwBbivW zRV~>vl}}p$QAkfFlBGCLHG>w?X=z)uW5o<%#N%n@rSJi=k9V$`tq|>^La+XpoQCp?|eZ8>G7*2p|#2hFK;mTo0DJt{UtaHLj z4x9c#ld@OpZZ~oLwD>QZtfdX$3(`EGek-1&brw9a#ivZ0v(LQO30aq2hM6XBZKaRI=&Of{>puCi4)pv1X{_J&Wmyys2#tw4x_0c{Wd! zrya-Lyf}ZFF#^XJA0LCNt+|~q^UY+=7$_m9SQPSND7`9)B$PLUM-VY6PrrOq1+@9O ziBQphYw0V@zaiyi^_Kt!0Y0hj8Jlf_E=_T|%?gq&7mn@? z$zD_fL=dFwxZRi#+SS|1RWfX?Ua%F4Ys*SnZVph}e^IwwFZ7apDIS__kq_R<%Jr*i zrZc3A&kWnL+w*WYAYRmM<034|wqN}|W&x*Ruu~*l9?jhc#^HSPW;eh~Mx7baW<*-D z%GKgAMnBMz72YIX=pIKKx2_DM6YJiEIluL3oRxR|9^Bb8y=zUsZ39A)!eu$J1(03& z#OO#ilu=GFyt%COk9{MOCEaf3vZ=+EZro-Rto*nvlf}jK6R_D7{6QAe@&Lcavexp> zG->lUl}4~#L-5Amdb?d{X=P?W+(jr7vLC{r!BH;c=t;X|eW-!=-7EJ#nS<-<3$0qQ zey^ynMb3fe?Dl96c#i7Unfd$`F(tMzq^^fYH#y1VxekHah;t>1Ju&aU^e`@hs%JO= zakIhG*4?-bMM0V5i$fFU%MBsrD%cR5{A%NYfA#i4@?krj%HS);!53ARHbnOWEMJSC zKt16JW3R;rtMp2dfQ9F)KZxq?Qwrd-K(grK+5pS}*YlF}6Y zr=5ek?Z;9L1!5?D{JL&z&YsRu_0n-A?V4)e!S1~_zbc=^ibXxr3+HCqUMoOu1u=w) zgQbIcv~X=$ER75)S$DkRhj1PbmQGdOzD4yRPA~?AZsTl{M7er1aybuT79~nVsa8+E7SnE=aEY4M*st{~sSB65NyBlwRBl{qX!Y|38`#N8S!>ad z`POEupATYGnP4c02jPoz^`(Il-bvTI+lT!U2#~++Pfxw%+S_W0`l|7Y{_~ zd~7&Wb)&LoQesjyTmD@NA_%}hn<4HrRV~EPj*4e^5!Krm-PW$C&qdOQ^3n^_S#19?Crm({Bi^T=W$As;H^^~HE_wX%I%MEjsIN{D6p6%Yc?^_l zPVA<&nz@OuZZL_$^zwv$56f+!@=8p3?|aBSEM3EVxh-BJ2^69Dm=V?+(F?~DjEUqM z#lIEF=aw&w75;EM(NEA<5Alh|Q2))S!M*~L_VLMxi&!1jCKz*rcjFwmI{Hdbm*W8n`g7jgzJwQ~7kQDv0$WQOR(vF)FY<6*Dcd`*#g&y*~xQ z+ehkGo#0D{GtBa;1r~HV7uG*a>`%D=h#;fxtym?`;?6}5=Iy~q*ox!9T{o@XvyxK; z2#FWQkeHd|)jx}o5JG4WQ}99Z8jwlWGk_Qmv~dXXe%*_duk^U&zky8DoS(_5B{U7H zouts(XW&wOGOlnQltPYfL{?r6;QOQ)c=uD;W3Uur3Fc~l<&wCF>0)I!R?n-?dQF%l@P_Y zK`Xbd2Gy5CL<1bA>_doRHfY_mDKnA#0Rx+1ZiJb80D5ODsBZaP)9nl~J#O=#jBUTK z@CpU7=7A~-ZVxZsly)ku)iRWYBhKgxI(!veuBTH#OgPPjwwR{Eh%G64(j%*00i#N@ ztau2q45xf@ML;6@5Z$G=8pouUvuw(hveAxb(*!AJ>RZ^!gw}f50a)-4d{$Rkxm;qp zmh=NpAGhpam#z8~v~1QEBcw4a;Yyi)%{EIW`F0RrUMuTV$GD-!L42UHh_7zH(oRCz zQPFH5>2Ir2ICICfdPkejq=MTi{WvISVe=+ReG-BtTW_*>#>|1yUzF9LU07sQhFRhD@dcQ z{k-xk)z_&aD}4j`!nG{dlL-Y1J33c*;{X&_^U&PNN5L>v?W9DoCs6GfLRxQe(4hwv z5QD%!KI#L&V=}1LL2)o3K{958&!p&Q-@Twhh@y}orS|O}{b}Vf87Q70G|@|eGaxFk zl5Pe#kZxf^B|h8qK89g?f#HnKZb#YCZR{yb4$LOnq0<+c+WPA zpCjMTT0^Ut>+DuqKg$0VG{@4QS~MvjSx>7<1K*vL)zzHBCZZs%W(Z-lveR$+PQq?< z3vTfMOl$&u2^&E;9IyUUpyfix9|FH?Yd>Cn3Fb^Ee_?M~@@F8f-J=)rbV8%glJV=d zL?83nRHBB5vho<_c(oV3)j5*MfE3=RILn~=!{<`ShaMC>vS@*`64(he;ud$wc5Vcr zD2fV%^yl}k4aAB*%!U<7DS`v<8%8zla9iPv>h}`%pTtE0)nZ=x%yu_Siw2mZF59>c0RYMsd7AYq4t%lsY?4}} zm^aG?y=v8s^AVU3bIC5~e2ysgOeF#md>qBddl8rx(XLM#_L(@R73w|I?~PZfs^c(aPbOR%&p2*WXHp&vk?+W6cYfX4_iY;3)XoQ`s}76PFD%sRs2nZrJ7;V zZWD;Y<)X~MnOx{4=`y*FD0i7fpQzFibl~=ZU~-5gFMGBN!LJ^y{(esRnYU($G%J?E za}XI*kOLX$7B>`fr9Oe{ue!ts!2DXKy&W|;s<>hs)j?8WG%1))D5Us~WxAT>K9YwJ zt-gup*H|cc2-RUssG#Sl%l9(VIk;j;s;S~c8l(y`UuY5Jbhvtphq&~>OYS;_=5Rtm zj)=TbBpJ6E?3}cKgqkCLxRH8raAt3&YS16kDUM|rFS2b;c@P2bkt-^y>PzNH*b9fD z!45>_MTQ{?+u$zh8H%Ka~m^K{`F}SI;|{j*FAM*m|6(=F=U@= zOgnWK!NpsBS&Mo+NL+m&lZmpHxOX?yP7^%C=RtOj>j;#Jt8cpMkR->;W>8G}GmrD0 ztjYD(wRUa_l&Khw@B-hvPgt$RR7ZuoLg6b{XrD|t_%aN>;+ZeoYK}8qRO?-WHHe-; zhv!RUab|saJy1$c%|Bj!dC|9=0GqR+>aKoQvEeatDo${`u>=^qTs8Qvn5wSSW3Fc|rC#ng+Be4@k;k_cM^xptAg_P3M>FC$OB; zKHED=c#;>??}tj1a9q}0JY(JNZwmE!*PpDlgMCt$pDO*%aR>d|>NKY3l~YI%Iz@*I z@i@0NOOCb1VG2)RZ`(qB)8JyqR0>-u@&*N@N)JrB{niGL2W*Q2w}psVBa+e5U^a+f zSbr9hjrf+=JvgKBcdwCzCo(dc)>+DxA^-rns&$#vI^sSM_xPa+TkBL>781Yhqqu56 zzGxOAGX=7}6uVinUKUz6Y#U(wM5sL(WTY5SUA9Q5c(bW?WE(JhQk4G2Q~%eR9Z<>; z@id&4v{A}T^wUwHhpl#y7CM)m< z)5BQXB#PFB6oN5YxQW?R_Eh&k!Bj(Nt2cH+2|rX8*W?vKE4@tnRh|*zxB56 zPb=a5sj0Rbnz~7u+bz&2MOTez9nMFLvQ}apyIqRiiy;X$aw#UhAPz#DO3B$;vDWnI zR@eCZ+LpwOW2|b0U-Mc~{1~{>faQyK<2G_VDz#ETNBBih@O=pQKBXfwPMInx)qkRn zbT;Kf>Ah4mod~t;Y=d0=PKigC0Iaa4rCTX>{1?&}HCpDf2cphqYnA-t?X^ju-{D$-T34tER9CgMJNJwD5wQ*`#Ff57^1PurQYbZURA+D`vj*aT z#8bVYS(P0(A0@ue$J-PrbPFB*%|`_hU%8C|EOdLeEf8Flb6B9E6IjwbRy1X zvnDIPN}&o#`L&I5%A}L^jZcL`A&qh6x()yZt~g~imHe`+hNizkC&On)vv3PtwHS}` zAUF>*+NYvama688lEd7=o8rP0Zao|MzEOizT|_R>eYSYkVKSIl<#kv!^10=UUj1#| z?zTMT)v{*tx2?4?(9`rbPhrR5aXg7;U%JjyRCdkZDk;;{cSFpr& zRb=!w%vb;|H#;#&@+t5sI+U_7aZwGwF4}2Sw2G&|LPA88ZsX90Zbx5jmh>2 z0wz`81`SQ@4{9M(zQsBMK12NX+8?v(;+Oj>2k&-)^a%HRHlvc=FFZZSo@hnE^x)ou7_+A>n~+JdsD#zX|nl~SygQK zm4-&r-ow-LP3D)b8HKOsT}J^=sPtwY3us+m2F7$0Wu`ev)4kaIR9MyUxjh}i3^Zo; zWe(#qh`0#jf;u1oXF*--hCRkr+?sP05vKjHuSB|4m6Z}6ZV6k}ccXp;BWKwh5{4F~ zG*4vLLcGX)nz*8MPnv=(`P|#(yHpVz5q8Y0f>v$-l17^xPGX0qgXGbue;~Yqu7kw6 zu7)Yn8Jq}M7yRCLYA5l@ib+TI=gUv?cI!b7q?O5TumFS|6*k~eAHKqK!ZBxyah3-f zm>`N07Tqj;_NQ}Neb!kBHKZNZZ_mH^n(jMQYS_x((f2O5`*Rw){+{b zh?Al^QXS(G5(^weed7cr5rz)zq9kRSEJowDGol?G1YIocXblS1GAX;ICHNAcm+t@@ zf=`JMnhPq-98VQU0q7+&sj2&6kPV4)#PC}I~Ncm8Z&7F4dn89U*av_YX^K>bi zDGHC}hs6g{nnxE#GnwjWUBRcb@xM#ZV0ZP$o4iw{=Ir*s1wosn3|xZnPs9|JHrc&; zW9u~Gi%LE>Kvfuo`Nv{usif4ABHJl629cVQ0+-@NxH1Z=v^aHXiYEWf!hM>KEWQC? zTGlvOc47~vn9*-CF4!$)5THHJYpWzMfKg+Cq1d*mMD%Y!BVt~-k#LXGyW zkAr;mhjyh}!3{AeBzuswHKR4Wrp0^IMtw9z?@%8Qi#uu77Dv!)Jp;GzDI|F*XWsEG z7lD9UC8$E3YBV@JWnU{HWsc8Hjx)vvsvq?bmW8F9KIPF_Yx*tBvg2j~Rs7{&tVFv* z=>x3Q12pMGQoP#dKQxTf6FNb$6RqTSSWv@8=C+BR@*Hv&nL*q-7V$Fq^T2<*-8Rlj zX$nB&{#=P2D;XxuFkna}J#3pJ?Ss=4!&0dZMM{L@e<2{m1fKayj8tia7FW9;Dcf6>I+nVcX@O|1jr6^k3(%rktvKN7kYZ1zah%%h! zmGYmfw4QEn0u|ly>!|}NrrWqvt(3-7WLvzU^mU#)DNK~Vhc=(Nd&b{Ok6R`0vzO8n z+80e9b5Y7>7lkof)iq~eHlts|LoUN+@pq0<`|WL#g1KQEty)|r!*S^H23=-?PFt&~ znEB_O_b`7%ecy7K#WiNqneisB{uzRA&`tz!KH;ozH%VPn_D?nAVmaFInPsz(F$lx{ zcYS62JcVBgg1^9K+3%BRCi{H%T5ohNH@sRo~N4YYzuLZMM)S{u(fP%IBm(Bsh z1-(~geFsE%Cu2M*xvZ25&tu2t)(BIBI>abYI5hxN9Han^9G=ixeR+T~?D%xf7tmXE zxwQ%$n1!Qax$SJRZ4|k%x-?Lh;<`Q@g%9Sw6G$d2HrLW*lem zpe~Z>@8fT$M(iF8rb!7@k;YY#R1s*gQytn;sj4*;A4P>JJKP2n7o89BW1C4LZM&?5 zv#j)iX12+WsFT9J-5WspPLK=DFmezE3dc=$OI%@T<5S6|ky|8lk9dkf$m7e?f;CoP zN}kRJBZACvZK78fB%AiE!7!N2v7_z*c24@P`RxM?fVNHzZ?)*B+DYzo^VNoS%Nw!y z#@Yv4ps!g9H_$D_DVk|w?uR|Pq&~!z{(0OaXtF(Dl6F>!XNTKxejYc%cvXKLv+G^s zBTsLVzla-qikedPqHZeU=h`LaoaJ*n{DhvRr^%s$x-zZ~J!6dG_x$#xhNylD{id(6CTg;;;eH?*1mJSxpP<1)b$i}36bpH)zSy|9d zfD2=oD3#tPb;QOyWZWU;zyR-_rc*~}P}yPbu0dkgFBRXv`h9vLU;XjL<{tp;YbmLN zd{K^1K@|#JK^iJ6ysT!1z7UR^2cwAYv!Z+U%F{@n)8Jk&^wFDt-*dzJDL7t-d)5|s zJTSgRwn+wP+Y2BT8--(og}C8?WznL-``pYq1@DdfTvJk6Zs3WWok^F6kV|NTJTqPn z3k=|3cPdzxbxM@@TQWjg;lmliw_t*_qAt1c%CZDm^J0-ynLG&}LUu2Vsuf{M(Ux6P zm*L3P1f_WRQO7gm?4M33@Nz56;Yay2h{YxaRoCXSOx)GgM`kOy8AQ`b4V|x>da%@etvZI1)ka@kb&n%dsxCQGPM&PmEacT4b)Yk3j62({3|s0 zif+sur_aTG)hhQ*Ac^WrzkxkxrD8jo|MScUPFuOh74`SYQkv|37MjIz4&h*bvH7Lg zn)G!e1zPOIr)@9fKx6RmoMyMk=UMx%cefQRDuU`lZFZ6QNGt5qI=6b5Yj9no#~=-JA2R&6s;vUz84hYt486F0ClVI(5$_vCwH|^Bb{b?W zs0HZgqZ-2Yh>QjvAN*62vVV>BZnB~u^E)M?06iY5=P?XjQ)?ucF2XZsM#?`Y#X-Rb zxXrueu$IT~C!4-YxFjHwacCL0-VEqzJ;S5!(+!K?L@R{iUG!XxPap_Pfp0T4utSnB zGvCt+!d_sV0y=aNY7v5s`KY8Gv}Kas%*)*HPmEY~*uk|9=C^ZJUHz`wCHtMaDtb#< zBl0osoHswQzfl`TGx29ny2)J zI5X<izxXE}+44Zl8bLv*wgHI*^eBsASSWlE7|S>t6HTfaIzr4^6#6o=+!6{~{ZD5-6!uh{@!d*xCYv2( zRP-mgP$k0dZmS`=pPL$p&q<5goCHHvqCym$-p;)N$SOP19&$Hs(OgBBQT`kp! zggQm8-5!q`6Ahw5lyy>lC4cRpDIJQ?6(&NSP#%qFC5{Qm4do&TYHCn8B6>a;mRDU1|u zwogcNJZ;wF$_e#BOhD28KykRWJVXK%H{i14O^Y6Xf#sN!rJa`5o#0^J_l@Z4c>ac> z-)WZNQ@BAJH70B~UDd~%R%R+1@i zLy-lz-%wxb=F)h%a$kp;74#nJ0g93I(#foh2i?X?auwv!u+iRH86yn$zR}<9ef(6! z1}D`PJ<4fCfvV~1KVVWP8zoMDwvtOqVluwvNenI(rZ6)Sb9Fl^KRx*Zslw(U@o3kG z%AAZ}r++{<7#P9Ce_zi-vlEDI93?7gW)sdfm@X#UpH*pplBiP25hVGy9w>2;$`>iA z#1)PGe9#ZS-o#iGt8B@{VR^B6m2P<}t$+C@Q{_S&2c)VEi}}ckB08G>A{Qn?@tjwM zqpVuyhGA!3spo<-W{(s(a%jsBiJu!tA$dAMhk$c`(O?sl%2JHgFF?&R0v-_yaW9x} zFj|wE63T@aiJyjZ!0cP8vdpOk=3C#+7ON#Fk*T!C4@Uk&KOStr@p}w9o~OPFxMIU8 z*t(Xju3GRH4Ry|$sTu7xwZ7fead)d+uIYAUN)0@q5S@<#s+gl6w}|!ZD<=i)R-$ep4;c4Ykk> zyJN`x2Y^nA019XD*O1_6t$e)I*X=N=$`_482MpUaO$_^r_;*v1#mKLsd{4lm-(zX} zQP?B)1mgL2K-u%^OCI3@XS#reZpy6h_K7?t=^uTXse_O_VzY{G>yt@*NJsKr56T0y zF6XdM9`i{OdXBqVj5lHgyJ+xx3qG&m)P=12t^`!4{qD`?6bYEicDMPo94&fT>d9dY z^amKO-g4kp!(REAA_c_c-&{>LIHw!peJQ1Y{&ai>@kq=V zN1v00D3(!MWLm~m-rsY!d^nes0P5I5G$pwqrnw9ruo_-$CO5n3QLQ!42MPm1lAZFSm{=!&BU0KF<%sukum z;;Wl{if?Ldl%}&IiwZngPr=k3fsfPDQOZMo_WIA$ZEZ`Kp0y)g4T9qkbbCNMI+Rx` z7Xg6n5|`*IusEnSeu3--nSd zO1H_!91@dCK}+})N%Vs#`0%8lKzk>pYxW#c!PQLXsm}2Bkn}F+&>HNTU9(^fW=FRq z+*R%{yQ^?J?r3zYB{cV<(OwJGs>CkI=WZ3_FDYz)I9B`4Ov5ix@z@N_zMo?%aJhsb z&^u+&!#d8LAxxuhZA+Y#Ql>4gw*>W=_j_rXN%wklH1B6c^d72CY&2;JQ<}*q6O!%P zvI&}eXj(nBed&(%$8I7oNH>O&5z$SJbTeh6+5u0l)wD*dl3C=hWNc@tKQa$vYA^M8 zX{vHRYP3YK6#pv`j_rJ{Y(6h)!12nJWK68IH5R3fY6bK~ktg>$*UijDJ8_XQ%6D)1 zSp(Al#VbN);pfNg8p_UX1)m8~zFQTolQuYe!@L%jOoo0>lCy{zWNlY&Cf3l{Nhfnm zI)3rjaTyFj{MpKPbk&fU_vjCnjouO(P#7^S{e`pYWqe-oO9~}HVwSp~)E&b-viMV& zE?=0BoE}2xCdRF@Q5;`s%w!)}3olzCl$ekD*JlRyPLSRwC8&cb?-!J1^GG8=H}1_Z zaU9fOCsX@-Qjtl0AhTIPa(zo~a&4`Q1gXcovp2K1ZAxSdp8hWJAOuylq#h>uW5iC? z(6_qMbKPiMDJ_fAR+6eTrHWgeoB3h738^2a$pFe8Vauf8a$ht%-m8e>0#dw?g1(N{ zcoe+~5?++Qc^|^rud>*jpl4J*bn`~l<^*DUI*P|CH=H_-Bz{Wbov&ol8^KD-_PeH? z)n9H=6tv%tW6Vs`@7qR*l=9WY(Vvd}aEi@I?AcZC3Rfd|o|*kpNFi4(jW{>rCJ8a% z;;?%Q_Zn(~6d1LZi}Fs6cCp&%)XZH40iRl&vyFXRKN z%|}b{#xQ4P!xf0RkU8`T@|EG0FxA=rCA`wl0%>r=Fq#5S}HitTH#YT(k?jE)o9}aF4?g>Kn3@S=$ zI!HO;n(>P@naZn@dqfCP~?CeYn-_FIgntrwdaX?Ppk4|5Apr7 z)Y67EA9-C|V-QtL@nRVdQg5Z7qy$cT3CR#W1(!2V|ftXk_AOI8;1nz+6xqCU-4+Qurd#p7-;LhE%aT&KlOudgj|PW;22)k@+e zexau*^YgSbUx@NKCE)w3|E_c;C(JH38)&CGyt66y~ai&+buXvA7Ci5WV z96sPm16!p7o1pb7oN^h24Bb&FH{@mWzO}0g1$aYewOr|iwDw5vJ@0pFbmK|k07G_M z>so7TQrU)Q26H4l<(M*Nv8_~1l2ksyb{>c2TirEZ8GX!B4H5_|wjz{qxq;1#YEwah z5b>u}6`I_8h%?!l*G zP1%mK6=!8#g^!0|j8vW0+pF*{9SW&=t7HroQiarsC5{~(xeBVaYn(5+9Z~wX!2Y%- z5jk#)IS1~i3nDOWL0H&vq|6f2$hSIZP3x;JiszVVzuOcb@CV&d@4SiogiiT_2C0G` zuFmaNEnh7{J;~G_N>w_v7>khEXF?lfIOE3R>N^DJbV(C6=o?^TwyLsaUE(1yw;;-U z76hw_CX2YTsQfgkk7n;$qVZxvR>dO&)du_QRUMDcrBD;9hC|P-jM%Hf!}Hi7dV)oYc< z1$x3Ha!M%<4QBf;!pi9VHgA4QB2n_g6&&y+<@P$JE-crchXJhc#EB5;xWSct z{|>dZ)ow7>=YY)=rqB0O9J`g;(zMq!k?RUEaTSO0BD;fn?nlcEtE(=Wy`xg$HS?!j zhb!`)TMK#ke&Y* zY)aGEh!&t6z>@e#Ax&hlwnek=UN8FgTI+~V{ns;mp5FENJcx=wu~u~wJN?!kOEe4E z?4hb6{+?2H(@w0GS&1e7{{R30|Nre>O>f&q5dAAU^(41W69j1j^YDqdmR2)o6ap{BV%DUNrnS;$R+A15#BWY?Uv1hSd=pg&8WWv-jPAV#dqb5Y-nN6JBwmVG#fT35=?m!ET+ z%6XL7gR%+Rb>Px&;+iU41Wtlu?S9d=^qoOWASGGlzlJ2Ue|F7(mFsqY=*`_?Y~47)C9Bz{UwyCxak&nJKPGi?Y%0K3~vP6EJ- zjz;I|YriWUd@HZu9(K*{q;x+g)|qTLo{Pz1r-RAF8c^R_G4s5KpWeSj5f#CGBxp(H(Lk#U z)el6QPd&nlfi?TfJgw+6-L$4v(4(i8bqv%u1G53FyH2!y>~6&`QfQrW_s5XR){;&l z_4U(-iO#2XHG1CL3yHXNSO4%}!nc%`yajkucUoOPx-9ar8%EhQ>kbR*hn%DAxuH(F z3l#53ZWk2RbOFuoH;0ngP zn$sYt<<_XY`h)fO>MM7;m0QCE&|^AJeF)Wuy>cd+*7Pcqi{z;w;C4ePs~^J&NVJi2S{)w`>MxN&DYUGcqGhoGn%32J=w6~AZOB|6`9+WAVga8x326yG zxh$EonE7}2vxSrHz7`uZQp`d8iL6Bti%$^QDD=ftv}ke*8Fv`=&1w@dgQ2?gj3Kmg zP?lEhlanB2sYlTn*DgCjCe9tKXj~Nxn7~ye!|}LIrq~Dc1j#z9@$;=gPf-b(O;;;E z!TAZL@!&>Ym%N{t+D~Z3-)$x643^}d8?;dKyOZ1ovv7P8jo;X;DG-LaaB?XI?`!mt zDi;F-Vge(G$%&P|!M-{U9=j(XDGr=-vn>q`(Ad7`d`3DbVsp_CAIENZgG^Qa7h5va zI)e@3oXAf2MhGg(5=*V=iurQP&ns9>T84L@1#C2xu|&n9`5^dC2MCvrVy>V&U>SDHxzhLFPIVbTnD&aRG*fx>hDlOI{R322XlM9Fs1ky6e<}gW`)M!@zdP z%Q1DtDPaG!(xaZ&`dZni^!Qid>MP!x9zZqLiU7K`j?v@U+TJxY6*>pEz8OC|);HU? zuc@1=bvU+JWJv)N1r*jOGtL&FxoC!YbcS^trO~nkfQ##4>fj=312Li(rIPKs((cJ_ z3z;Dez6xd=(aBSAT0w&uPanf<4`sUCM#b+UZ&EuJgLR7Jq?oki&eNX%%!s|Z`gMkN zLIxE{R8*a4xtrX_Z&*8I7PwWdsZ`>!*vOW|&FM|(Wi^a-75vDZq$ zap{;yRx8H|MBYvuUf9Dq$t+os>7d19k?WjzO;5J`>5kPz%V*K*qGy@sbzGS!wmB79 zg{ArDfjZRhm3PSsKlI**Y6fKrm-LKh+SeHskYjO4gx!jAn>Q?_6Rsm&`+3eO3043? zCcpB{%(*LyEl(>@T5D0mg9FVv0;8t_brRx7L z2KB`#xa&{kJtnh7F3DtdH7ua1?28!`Sm%;tpa@_CpnW<^ViKJK#&kq`0n{ejK@CMR zq)`4qU+R9R&@*Mea6QPY4Y_=ES<+Wk|4HvlEws~U)mBnvWv=#q7qC9DDrMFp8yCsB z?gOk^GEI7m4Hsw6#??lxrej5JcBaY;JwQV#rBg#)t!A>ubdxlqqfC!PIb1q4G^rF4 zKBaZ=G^Br}civdrOg+9lLR0AEa;ja@n_5jtq$Xt!A)J6qWBY;ibsJF1P4%eNx~V z)EuiBM1PqsV<@clGB)#Al@zdMsQ{$vV!={qZXXgQ-s17hzda#XYO=Bsy)y8MO=~M) zO~umRn}bH%HyeQp00hw6;t_NAGgao$`M=XEz$aJ9RfFqKIfzwmD(p!LxExG3%u*4t z<>N>Y_n{GN^!!Y;fz4^&bFdffu~m*Jr<1%TqadYOyW;8pXALr8WokIwnn^WN6Y-0858fMg0#@P``t#nKtc^R;a*dkCejNUm}r%NlY;d# zQ}2bWDdJvxp5`-WzQsDjQ61y@h@xJIbsUINY(vy7`sG+ip0d~o(ak4E7{%T*Yo|gJ zyX5UcXodm>z1>~Qw5NB!_HLW{1B(`G8JMlPMBqPEeUzt6>O97&6hebZT(gF;YkQ1Z z#1LUhvxSlst(p&S75wjCd_U{ucXP?@xRH~bzwma-X*~8@ZNGb_-xdD=^TV|(I=(;! zqQRfh57jx%Q9Av_={JoDUC2$pJJ{%b)AwcL+|!z*@B8I8j&V!ldseOV)3&SkU+Bmu z8kJ|ioW8^;t?BhqndefR8<|MnB*pD3@!_+_1zwpYmlv_~E@Quctb+HjY2xqU%fk4}B(+X5an` zP)i30t1I%U5xxTe97-AhP)h>@6aWYa2mn%(eOv$l0000000000000pH004Jya%3-a zWps3DZfA2Ycx`N@k}*%iFc5`zensS+IxV7ws%ce*iUFn;A+cSYOJiaCBKy)%em!nO zLmx=Kx6$v^;g?9T)yzDmDcOnT4t^h+0GjYTqR?DkJ zI}gYlT_K4txG--sQ8CwZDTAueLKsnvE@~xt3mi+omo53C_M|X`7_~-D(sU{qDEOy=Zl>c5v`7slr)a7CIcYZ=;wtg}2%muh5Te;S+|P&y>1)+s4N z@%cRPRW~_z9o9EidPJ5-fZ;yY(;M34N4>(~*Id6{vHmvYvBz=6lzJeaTsi{~EqEt$|)&~ZO ztbQF)lnRhJfe0UGlGr5 z%e%SXx%l4k(EFPeaKU6J2Q9aWB~Km%jyTf1T@4_gKmMX<7X5)Tg8rwT7X9Yv?K)-vh~)2SF^KNoFEX?ee2`nD3er^aE2k~50G*3eP1yF z1~K!>Euu#G*K#-aJvham(y0O9_el2;q?Tj4M}Tc6-+QgIwg-`dSqg_CXs5J`L17iqEFK zM8CWn*Ho76zmn3ee?5X(BIPOtGI!CfDla2j2+FoMEk$+1Kcnr=pecegDJH7xjYmf% z`_7iD2IHL(%51!+TUC^W1N93iQm!nT&+!YpTjD+=^7M#%kX!vxyM&B0`WE5RVgvcG z2G2!KK*Jwe@o>{cB5OB>S!X7~=QU$h zK+pCYMao~E?U3BU&ik|)bnGCEJugL)mf$4V&wxlY?4pw-IvdXDSyF$LUy6?Pm|0nSQ55NZsybkW1;2r4vc73&D!Frq9T&FBSkk%F#+PrdExj zGjLL6q?)`ic;tf@3_eUi1$;(Jq%id+V`f$$e>u2T;k5O= z@~r3xg4HyaB+Tx=;O1Acy6OG&Ir=U) z_=suRNOSjfDHbtTfRt?Bxl?MbW2e)Fid*uYzS^fVhP+l)jj*tF_jfFL;bjluMr5Bi z1me-NX7t{L#=U9HnOsn?BSUF;;l&86GXTG94cyYSIFWz- z3cfJRbQbb>tRgzY=%_BnJY8*sw`|(WHoHhYYc*|G&uv4l0|na*9s^ddrdt+Hk%NYW zrYyM%%M4PcB{aO=Y;W2u6ei=e^05^BX_QqL7~}c0_a*T>IJlNQ`+Af_vbkX*Xw#&# z&4>Cv7@U?lDOKm4bk4g=Rxm&jRDyMYux{T;pe^l6T@G;BBMi)X2Q=Iy)~o3-<+WpKLHWqfSqSkO z#!0T1TM%E*$GSe&ID0RtPrJx;1hEZ*#uZzo>MEsBJUQdoPlw_)*iXW0&eN#a7l}yJ zSntCk17l9vMT#@&qP*hCahrU7)1PVqckN^8J(vzYV&`&Pz<2G09Qogj!5hNf8u27Q zpLY_SdDlXiwEj3!%z;C9-!OiiO}D)m>AE zwXwqGt;t$CkJ_ez{*nwpjX!%fnWBUsLzQ$J%a+*g4p1YRGJqY~8hSjjIFs-xkxcDe z%TRGo)a+*BSG}Z8Hvi~zx_hBRnUTrn_#|IP=8*@%T4Wk)fdY2*Kt{wtGuEGluGs^7 z7ot&;ja&gT0iY%?-AAvWU<%xh#p7yGhP5eo0;$i53B=_4A*+zZjkMadrO6!&BInVa zGaBZ#y2ju?g#j!uR=(FO9>H8ssh}5lKjJ}uEpP-63rnBp-{Jw)&v;-3b#m8%m^)Zv z5{~xR89N+dbi#2)bK{6f--b7$kmg>g5ee8YKv)Ke?`j}2R196H=6miGkv~|+DY`!( z8HV6qP%Rht*6O#C-K3CG;s^JX_yz49C&meBQ>A*(Udh5-D zjzY@MI)pK_Oqq>^L#oD`^?{V7{=7`<5z{hoWzd|BFf(cTGi=Kf(+)HCl^!iMUzn@q zU})O&J7hQX6ygiukw@-DYPVhy%4y@nACy7N`U4zUEb!8uk>%(k(EkwdJt7pz91yms z2UR+g9mXuJL`CS)B8F3x5YTobrQ)C>@*VqKVmhWO?lL85r5;JEC3l|gIkyJo#4kGf zG!I^|*HV1~-x{n6HkbC+tyIr!6*Hm$sixl zzX;mmxG)=ESqpk&76{F&x5WECd6vUZUldd)Huha%g%x8Km%6Y0`sh?}{L25!EKV>- zb4yorLXI)Zb{g1eMS><|p^jMTPg!oNL+dF9Yt2l;C?E|Upd8CE!7+=ryZylsa0;D>VdoBO*k)Px>BJB?yOm#R*b1CNr7= z7Z$E`9DT%t=sPZk;e7()j=g&y1=OpDG-3x3wTmMjFH;2I;q`rqV-Mo2 zM|^A4v#T9F7*!HOs(70|fzsORr*9j#*%}bdtpcXv>ZY#0J!CC+m%JTOE07Y>o^hDl zJ@@?0np(2XfGcWF>|vju_<;XMYfzt zZ^bemi_EAyVn@=YJ*wV}T-|-gE7B?JZ`IF}5(!v9UX&Wu23A)ETLHz>Z)t_bb~}U< z@#5S>N@8JPxPvFs!77p$X<@>HtlgWHF`$(K=eoJDsob?%R{H{8Kw!)k^@dGXt7H}2bRJI3}^pM#0*gV-3A9>_m` zs{d<9Fd~ZwEqgFkjC*-*vd~6>P%An%CQ38}Ybd}*K@3fkJ;ztZ%@!ohKGV-oil_Cv z!KABqx zoi)gUqP;uq4hkSb;KJ2uV~mk3LBNdfVaQh%(4L!l27@Ou#U|2pB$a&%+BmE#;^!l-Xy&Tvxo8tS;*uS%}hX9K17e>yq>!`}6qQu_B`FpY} zpEqvjPvYzuyM>u0$sD)LM!M{X+iVjTOk`H@8=3}>m)!IuGpc((gJBwDm@Hs4Q_3yL z$ZVe=akklbUZ_ziCagV>D3|$!?;|kHirTh+Q!MPR+rzvX<>V)Tj~v6_Mr?u662LSG z?%|*jTkL2F=`@KO!_yZg5M0eR&)-r$oqg-OmR4V!i9X83||J(jdjSic}O6ZVj>Ev#v*6-v z(xG*1_Od+?NY9Ox!nvh>8zvpGpf}JBu771_S=fNb3M&0t?ip;e!?nkB%DL*3J6LK4&UCT)lneMnUsNCzx?S$qWPK@pb zE9H|Svc?*Q>D@%aY`R$*omIdBlIEL;Loq19rjQkzwI)x3!lI^PqWfU?oY) zApV#fO4TSO|AMM~IVM=8U&P6qlROt`WX`$~0n-WbZn{QV!Ei}-_2_G9S+@X}?A|X>LGIX%QD41hxRmpur>3JbS zyeZ&>9urh8piX7(=%6Z$k1-lH4h_~nRjwqzwQ>ja*ev?HF{aA(YqNkp)^vqBy9qvq zy8cLgeusDFF`$gma2+(9@)v9&n)@F(#Mv3+0KcP`#<2nt(I^!9jq#a(nlkPs^kbNt zJJj)iDOh#=s=R?l4Wg$f`3H@rn9&J@nX9FPo8WCs|NG3mBv&3`fXwK5n12Dvp}qS@ zsqZf|`VwG{Xg9{p{y#NcE+GDT1EJ{K{X^4b9ltN+a_#F^cvBnhf7cv;hhHvhUmH q-}qm0yx;McUHexL`Z9+5zxE)_`*>)xU}2G>Us!14zn(yMSpNrEA;X3M diff --git a/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_4—Vers_une_histoire_archicratique_des_revolutions_industrielles-version_officielle.docx b/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_4—Vers_une_histoire_archicratique_des_revolutions_industrielles-version_officielle.docx index 73a9d2e619bedf1902f1d5336bf8bfba673cce35..bef7698353622be2bdf419c807d38b7bb155a7d6 100644 GIT binary patch delta 160329 zcmZ^}V{oQX^X?lP6Wg|(Ol;e>F|nRxV%xU$#I|i)6Ki7adEayD)Y<>q``fR&?(VL8 zUA4Np*IHre2q9Onh)S~H5a=Kyv^R$J|q9j@m8N}9)aho*8}1UBjk}t2@L937&xJZPUE(u7NExX9%W~EyNWuT_RpCi`ddR zVSv(sOrW9;r~*ueF>I{MIrTMyr~pr45`|?_$xcQG*B*i>B5HCYcdUu;3NQ15f$tpK zZn8>SQE1dcLiQ3g9i{PRi*nYJ$}S+?)-Z8ZM$LRl|I|Ov`hKo ztTAW>wI9g#S94_}s^D63kB7pHu$ZlXWdxxc{pSZW$gSlINY zd$)f_2Sb$ALL(xR7xWoQhU!KtPbp%8**qoao6Z;% zR%{F$MrjuN>~NCR$Zm|%U%r8hqAxhmPCJC(p#M>TyFC>BKMJV+pA`6~fhPDY_`mJY zNCQC#`d^TNWcn|p>A!%H1N#5TgAjVdFP_3@%LNf+z0Hn<2F+~`6OpyqVJn8F+0dzy zn_FF?1Bsfpeem-Axvr3Up{NQa=~_KLV#6Du7Qk5|w<%g}@Vt59gHazaolhRsV3V-y z?bd9E8BJ<199U=MH9u7OqXN@-%sLRtQv^dNZ*m;x2T_OUTKps}K$3>lr;27!8+|(j zs!5&B@IGn`V)_8ayc*SP-A4Im?Och~aO*R(=Du_|Wxw4jFn>J}9es({fPd0e3! z_k5}-YzMq~PE{AfO8BE*)Icw$JD;0s_p>^P_`H!O1MbLoTg~%b`GzJ!-V+(1Icl_LW6EJZusIR%RN`Qh3~_;HhcFvpOhe>bnuiF5Wer* zxq!X`$C#6Kz;Fy<^c}--c(L)PXxNPzl>pdeD92yrLblm=XXHHR$A3i#8fI!ldRO_M zCiDMOlh*xLFk`U)$dD%f0Y(DQopjmc#@wFOtZz%t)aE8N*G}A4Rso`Fs$FsGH}G|b zN=Y50LvVv&kG>YpcpQzM{ARiXorsqj&pm${NDP3#-OG-Gk8kt+eA3;+Gh{g=q(EEr zH_w2gL~;`VW~TS<>gPnu2f>T!9jX4NIw3nb+2s26{B-IcE{bahy@CbwdZwq_k_={hDdqB&pr>CB8;$uotpHJCKrSt7eVr$ z;9*zE=6HBUkQzF@CVc`%7V^&OUJfHs`(wi3hX`h~(pPuD*#6|A9%8aNT8k`u%Xo@n zNa)G6hf$s|P|)q;w6bYm-bV146W+({MnHEM9Uj)KC#`mlMhEn39w|=ws|@v?LIzcv zjZ~TcB(18p8&|0Pna1?(=f~QaAPzqZS#5h`=1+$Aw2<&rd58?C>OFv$G#(TBV@>`i zY}6@6I##qEri>ueI&7HHo1?>2F=*w01wvkAXfCqAiGgKA{g;Qyj+ED@7X5FqY<)V0 z*wN43sx?S&$YkVPSt5&kydr-^G4Vx1Fu(3N69V~2q#7Vd_IN3mLhrdKrwvcR* z5v0(wC*nwtG?PXE670uDK27?H+Djtl#Da-h*j@!%1ilmm=S%;IFxOMq)JW-Dt^^E2 zmFGJof37$9h~Gz1r+`N~Mi94OtwY*%bNScApThIvm;M`wF~K(|zWQh1>jdTrA9;5# zY|q~m_dK<{V?z7HLC(;;&v@6z=m4{#h1*6H)rS#@|PcZ?sk>uZKiUm5(vF}2)UNx_W688dJEbp%^Jwt^+jgW7 z+zE_~OTMIF)$8`Pr!C4OWq5XMoTG#R0lZKJk3F1Q^776`C6*wVA2EwC1m+?4UO92P zkg98X{UXN)jxq#h&HG9{7)*I$3{ z)N%3QOO5J%tw^Wr;~=i#E#S4>g7k$}HUapWw>dC1ob$iEy?F3rIfx)C3TA@hS*Llr z8@8<*@LF?L*-`(;0R7L(U zT1`G}66_Hpluh{0Bi&QHTY`K@S2s|uY^m9qJc(f2`U_5_ z{~}$h%x(&OL~G{HOAcMT4Z1dqw*oe1q!ZtZuPjrbX6uJO1F`3K4ltwhK+l&(JKndp zT*HX{+?Jo79tBK0e(`b%(Dso_$|CQNxbN~5{xpB=gXW-?HCwLlT}bwhs)2GabCflm-CFhmeq7 z>3nba%5CFTq0zA_M^xO4L{f`oo+(qFLU=_B?)zq?C-X=R_aC)&jydA}(IEFiyZTQj zq3;#nd>g|E53;qUSM|JdnRl~ET>F>rj&_d_s0WSDj81OKJ)6osuWDcnR8RcE0!ey% zw1%N1<_lFLGE1F2&nR`lX#qz2GabLIA)cr2Kzb%G>By8>;T!IdOiW^HoV{1pHeH(p zQaS`REVb;*TQPVP+BzsG zfKsx3N9-?KZ7ip7zTP2Gl1l4rWFj^_BMp|tMiJDJG>U6X_Mbq#ivgSom_i>T#@H)4 zNUL5#@aO^~($mu|2bJ-o!n1sDT$oglC?<>y;i;fuKLGpXD()gBQ0kIPDSO{jL{)*J zImqf!4Ge3ZJO%EP60(lPGWP~{M==jIBB}g_8;J=Rz&t_JqC7#QlSjTAeB`7P^$jlC z9pIdwMDOu6xja#A0wAYYr-Wxn<~JSAkmAdH>TLmK=O0yMMe@qL7PwZAJPUbxp_Dsg zcxVbZj~pGQti(4oPEgs{x03b&0{cj85hO*yhZj&5YX2@QmD{HTw_J8=EoR4N%=Y2e zTUUI+SWxfdY**_i1GAOaScn$lqA&Lha?wwVb>lH^0lv*F1hYrNQb>YFtVVKz^E4om zXc!0ZxwL4L0d7tiP$s=l;GcI!>>4e3_*pjbQaw5Df=4AcTOQ@65}$Z^zUF<(@gd!} z&h>Qy_)pIvJoD(o4Fdu)CGIdP$K_r-6cRG zosA?9E3{itkubiYI8<_qF3vLs4y|m;p}=vB@C6qs630tCsAi=F&(1=GyH!8Lp9Y80e0b%%XP$BHtGE^sMWT`Mosh2EvZ zuU(ORFdm($h}!WCL$yEmCj`RoHZPVyZ8SAm8fmw%&=uErf!7$%5%iCsyUK^?9d2&l zh_+Cvf(+NsG`(!KlGj!Xr;ssaXf;oK59WesBQuZ9`D(KCvFqKT(4L<|4>x4wt)F{$ zeE$(Dz?m;5=wEYa2=zaOx&Q|!2juKJY%rsb+&rUGKih)^3n^Q3*jFy;t0lEquaZE7 zV{Rr~3HfZMt&?3gyutnY0+G)$gNPWH>7ffV1+>gM|2(F0@b!C_8rT^*B{g!j_{+pl zbgCN10M?O-BiOU6FBhE~!~4w>es@&p`RbJAK+l95|X` zBJWZTamphx5bh(w}E4=N6!@ zU(&+hN8dSbY22$imkLK>7=_bRkX+9W0mH6MgnDhGGn96^Ysqw&f0L~-l4s+358dIZJ|sd~{LLUFA*AVNV;(@^W;-P^ zJdJ9L#!ig^Z+R@+CPS4BPjhmF11Q~Wr$W|QnX11$cK>ZZIlEbjw$e=< z!bM@*sGIEg1@_-jv5 zTx%@W+Kh_C&LJsw_WGEfZY2I+U7cNT0$BWrA5Teq$+RZV<7g!&bIcXG{) zIDh}0=DLza?(|!p@X4y(O)2_Vcidg7^R?=IJkgCK{QQ{iv6)bw0eEm%JqHn8eYo`k zdTc*_8SWfu_Fld{_S|SJGmpiralCbQ0v!g82?aa)ArHCt@!qpO?mL)z<@{L%6ObR} z1rK@*2%M!}SGXV5`D^wkga?}WlWiL$`&1Li`2E@WDo!nrfAVZRH5Gk!+>~|`*?SaS zY^Ho-EfTi+F-@9i1GpYN`(mjM;MY?o9sB~nuU`RqPam@ncZC&^OnJF!)4SbwS(QWA{vRV*o^?6y zZv`DZjvr)k13ta_@3xNn&0I-L2=6WwqY2MxDf~!08Lc}gfQ!51MHe;=U@K9tdDz+A zE7u|5s``!Y#_!ejW0*}_{&7unm~Ys_@KbQu@!a^*=C$!s)6ymA2=v>zGSZC${qwl$ zp*F(`CbC0cad2%_eNhb@iTm965!w(S>QB>p`EY*hIkfJt^VHc9pGWVGb(rySig3EQ zy4}L`Y{|V0D8R02Nj4vvtQaxbju;=}s+=yxJ-+G*ehndEpwhM*2G;5bn5`?Qv!M@G z+RC&;5B_GFEZF2=0;o?uKj&0?e3sZW-HgZdG1XRyxKBF0R?;2~>Th0oJ~)wPdDC&` zYpGAGVO`wxyaCEu7LrD%9nPQbG5mpAiXoT3?E$X-=f9ts|4d=JAXU+i7K z$JtfExPLB=A->+rt3|$Q8qW%OdrI=ndPM#`4x8865`G299vg#Fh%N{A%Z^Nj!?Hu0 zx(!3#etxaF8m4{*acOmgn6s76)lRam)3Yr;xDFSA3*kB#Mj)d z=3GEBqQZp3rcAC4orija+I=gafMWfPjvUSNFxsf2&6 z?$~(jP+%0z0>2**BX@MM&><4E)q`&LmZBqT#53&3Y16w5p5Qwd*HHNB>|dhU62e~c zx@uefV%zGFL?qGNq)TAwfJ)^7s70Lq${2N=W2P?IYy2huYgukXwY>JlX^Oq8FQ6A_ zSmkhs^3{@H$u@qIhBiF|2k*NZ&T@X-b#!7k>Hk^((yh1FlQ27OKxk`c`E$LE>~I9j zl*~tJYB3WTxN2_~ig3}KZNO+|yvhu605RmU*Xqfxj|`-;i>Sg`bMyUc>!-oDUe+v7 zQAo2GW>Zx=!V0HYGC&I?kTF$h0^I9rRcjgF%M{VcA{~c?|g6Ms>hvW3S~zv=o$&R#|i{dQWt8h)xi-l#v4afaf!l%yFs5y2|b zYIa$FWS?27uAJL^q1&aJiBIUaK{adENo%CH!c2RxPx@VY?MQ zegHOGia(~hjon`5ZNCZ$UA65`LcwOesR)abv%t&Nc+a|=19c<|D%NG*0 z1}nOTP$oew6qivtkJfG$7l=JLvSPh16r@EM%DWsLl9fvY5f~L7KJCO>OxnAszh~+9 z3gh|Ph>oydNII@DEkTQ@M}d%2kU93OhHeOTE%L4OSu%1u(z5&}036KDNr1VYn(w>g zuv=}@%Tt{T)FM2~VA}%Q+8{0#6AE&j`>Juf%vhNv43^GSYWBRbkV|gI`xf?1L#Z$1q!$4%h=7WkurrrI#Z>v~CNjmAPF*58ip^Put3VDn&mNogr z6%C_w?%Xk*-?1?$piX^%AL+5B#%k=CiU9+SX_>*WPu4N=8HL#OebUjJOXa@Zh2x&^ z086L)v8LnZm*1@?{RbSsJWc@ni*07iI^<6L+{u|UA%TpK#o%x0+PEMW)s2`HCc zSaO5i;#l8cIeR819`vY-PcB3SRTAg;l2ffZz@YmsDsIvQ5F+GC=M(I~$d|V@we&Il z7MaoR&}`sS-s`1-z1El$%>TXopWuwXr&rnW9k*aoWrr$09B8R9Qcme>v?2rk2#*x(0dg z7ngouYIRCK|FzRp=3Z>#rrv7GAs#?%vB& zUjPFEXqf(iK1G7<9N&?B1os5QdzVp-nD`j%tFJVE30)2tEuG&hP0(~|@4OcuE~~Xb zMVdwlcWc3{@AS2H|)!DY5Ql#Nw{YjCB?JNjjROitj|~E5nbmjvHRq$bX4I ztof+3Sb3IVS12Rm!NM~+ez4Rd$tk(CWBb_fGp9hU3%Nk*7sG~l>j5(JZWd6t-Sjwnzs!5MYp={xcTr52aSu|19F*Bp zeXs`sQpf?Bt#WV0>V1N%jq+snm?4`KprGhLHNZtV(e-#0DXZ(j-P@k|mb+rK=;0dh zG!%pqAI4vE-h892?*Rkx0j|jkaYx6*k-L0zp<1yN0?yuoF=~4aEwNJAONxNIn3c8bjg15y;k-Nz*#dL z9|EMwFWF0`ICM2~NevaZeX62fF>q8GhkU^;>tx09e0>b!Kx_k$O$LPy^nu*P1&y4w zUFbQOw3Ev;bmi3rivgUVYx%z1S=a|G&!3Fr$VoP2iCmWfmmoWjTfU{2DuhGEp7$0AM~v=Ns3(Y?2q{ZYVgKMCUqHN zA39OTKvUyRbGoWzO`(m-fdmaOOm!fluS}>&cC=i$o_QHsFG5YPn0bSJn&2j|*Vv-5 z6CgXR>WD((NIN$7yyIC;aY8g#hh(X@Az%{#_@oZ3+p6~{lThL1Uv{hju-9kQOSo{2 zSgvslW{O#75Ok{-AJE1Qrckw@0neGJ0pe-+2pVGv<;DQ)?*Tg?M zcJu9yBIM9R@B;E_x&v;8ruxQ^2YY`l?vY+k8#fz~D!)pmEpe!#)OgCOe= z5O^XFE;hx&CdvVO5W7AVT6{f|MTb>;^zdVexhV$=_huGc}*ZA@A+nslLUlnz?Ud zL58qm>x8xd?}X0a6Y;{km2W#V^=`$39X2SWPgq9lq^P3}j?R;}^qaT1?mrK!QbO^b zAAdf+2WVd3%^i0eDyVNF4nq@4Mzy|;&gKdNJlQb`Meq>;HW&ezR8$GH&iGo@A-%ry z=L7ic_)D6)eGG5H?Qg&S< zNC&C!^LsZkbbA>Bos6XqJ{PZGi(r^$T+v&DyN|Uez(155jX*52U@R;2jo4ARJ$HxP zafC5Om-JA8Uo&YnYa|VI>Sr+z*uPtjwhGw|`mY?)rDwL500#pYCy^Em9Rwgj>iGoJR-ky)36d0FPhN!wj*D-zJ7lB-EQ>KO<^fR7NrE7ZUYH!FJA?*}duGF%8D{JClPwtv z!netY4`AMgf*fR_JIGL$4t<*mLZAQ9AxOmb5eE{&zZRZXxjizw?5G7PbvPD@HS+?O zyxChjTc7^j`-#|+K9jJxIFT|j1##b8J*DV8J z7-e38_1Ysnrl5C;1^r1K>)Q1Z$1cptHR2d?E2eIg&Ow$IiHt4mf0#x)=AQ*=beVZ1lG%>{K8Z%s zv{U~ow%<>UceVz>mhVs*9((xFy_bEzELRf24Nx${YqE6BuyBl1?4&|@qY*SX$~n2#E_c7w?^J6@#~dgsc-Je9 zNdImcoqt1phCR1g^BY^YuR2R;VJGTQl>B@q52*U$9v`TZJf>BH=84e&EN8uUW+fVM ztSm-`9Vo#|WPc!sGXk$$*D~S9IV9V8)kvfVhZ@bBqA!i*Xgv-_b5d%mFgrQ<;dusO zPm8OqUl8$OV@2iRg>8-S+%JB$`u8>PtA9_j2G(&p6i}#0Rr7g!!8au>N3>c?K9uvf zzG|rBnKYM^+gO|RyB$RV5)|nqSg2r-5lpKv1Jw7Bw`^Y9#oUB>+>D}GHCVG;9xWtB z^>D1%e&d_Ml&pvt@nzr8JtG!03j~ir=Bz{Xp{HQ^LY4k?VY_3q$#5eX&$Q>Qd-oi7 zFMs*CCA-1;wNk!?>U_|VobxI=)4R+r+XIaWIV;{w;kwhv5qjeBcEKJn1`lwRtS3%d4B2`nX45A_lY@)pdU-MvWPGm<|` zJ|QXfl%n4UD?79dgBU(=P&4tCA@JB83xx3sO4{#sAhm6t0hrxK{3B{_Qi(H-j`le} z2~h*(C+D8uI|t|uKvz(y&xgR57?f$e5x|(6V$0x1vH+5GPJ<@{0;>!3t2w0JWY9us z{d4wHQtqOg6IXu11))l31yIK4?OcSGMy*{qlo>UW-*?uvN*PG<)9}JyrV5pioH1Kx zB0fnXdsK}2POw$sF*lXLkC-XOq`#!TdvnLj?nic^}iCRt$d$7mX~C32tUqwQKUhPTWkAw$!&G#Dzk z)z%VdYT^QiiW>Ad8vOK34`YnC2#fdVsc!OftdPdRWdib* z2!J_jv|I(^rDvw8+PrbjY?ZT1y(Y6pan%v+1gW5}y7z3H1#a(8j0cv$2Nwvc4?Q58 zX)uhSXd=*_yWMmBxUiz2JJl&nuOApDLJ^S-fVN+pL=&2+Rug&Slr#Ye>x&9eCc zt{jxnuU;rmXDr9Lf(u-6SUx@*nJqn`#wW?ZCguXH`ks%f+L;C6XbNeThj2TS?hyH92KoprQZw6CTC}ks3QyP zuA%u_?`@5r)nKJd>#KeI2(u^H>-CbhwiXO1@qf>>$ytSUEW%-8&1_BNvF;^~$%O$Lx3j#(ll` zDsk@ek-AFhcV-wOypUSRiS`g0Oa~*-r5z%1Sj_<7%5;Sf;~g>W1X&TJ$NlVRH~UM`+- z{JlX~RKOEO^FR@m7jP?Z9w&=aQ6pva3Pqiv!r z(hq!ZX4~3kZ%d%7G6`bz*3@MVnb7nIolc0uyiY$*|ysXP}mcOryb1cTSigQ>OuLuPD>emk>UnVsXM9raeqbGNvp|8 zH0YO~Dvni)6YGTzKxkuV5Hrc>!(PZhuXk4WrU;N4Y8w#L%dryW>*kLz%}J(4C=JB~ zq6L+$JFWtRUDV>_Ets+ZQy>{P)qMoC1-ut2U4c!EM^*=*sBPL`q8J3Wt&1UNA)f^* zZgBxTJGB@hoyicWkFsTUbdX0neZ2ICLSFP)BUZ!ojAKxi&Vd|>C-+&uHt9MRRemP9 z2~wm-6_WY*iLC4vL$94Ejh*k7pl!66hB{PknGMF zFZkMid$ZKP=toRlAfx6uQ&A`|zF(7LUWhNZV8IXPVe8MyLl0ToTVaD~Uu-PBU6GDw zZAF$?-HX0*we$>w6xjZ~5c3(@m>j}}IAYkpI;G`t-sMrLWhhCm(bA2qRdb(aXIRM& z!3gv{#uGbW@q^0(`~b7RoWvMcDW`yFWKl~nzEn1#ZnKUJoM3wQd>x~Nvy;-o&d(6S zaE7YTh%jsJIaGr)`jzhdc+!rrd~3_EuW9IhU?j9L z3$l#EQ`90|P1st0Ft}Ran6yyYj5QSOTwA#%TKULIR*)zIV4@)FiG@pOKn;@HuWQ7R z+h^d-QMJH{%kmsj!84=`UR#6660avR{a^_Po890$PrVq`%J+imVt!eFE+C*C7Dx=m zKn8c3J|_^xlqK?yO1&c!Ig|0sGQdRDYk3NAP@1)n1IaUk@xV);m9viaR8k1v4_6Bq zTG#*b;5GgQ*f9v+=7BWM^*eTE$Wc*Y1L_FbEKHptMD1Z(w)1FVXhZd$%e=x~nShEw z3e~xinfGU7ZFW=Rf9Mnb8qz7#&q`@rwO)&tB-UQkl-e~FXQ6xL>FRJ7!|WA6ND6i@ zU{Y&noGQZECK1k|jy=U$7 z%eXo=h`I5Q2P;euW)6eGHv6P== zajw`DJUHDibp+XF+E6l;1$sxGo24(RHh23qL;am!DdPAjORiS)BZ`4ixr44^ISZ6h`(Hp;W94EZhFzS0`9Yggej z`jX_0KDA5i7if%z8a!B6#h)&w&PT0^5f1)$UZ~5wM6s>uQmHOj3@hO>s)>yg_RHz6 z>b0Wx>1pi#aB1KCnb+h~2Z-EN#`O(J$&F?+s)#WM@JYYz(!S@Fj)&4mPN)FQ{HRvm zRZ8Pu(p%| zaWe&C4#Yvf98!YAgY2-#Ql~L9`6j7cQIbR=?OkjoohSU=+>APibd>SSric zVv0|kL?yW_`oclo*m~IfI#+?@u5n6_m`L*swZM4p}?8dTDkRo0U}0pU zrIV87Uq8`qpe?{_nZ0#@_%g?r1oX}=%imxkVq1Bx4vtLb(0CK^SWI!4frYqH=gHPy zjneyj(}{v=V|fgStz+a*Ge+pwQC+qz8}6euP-+p_bNKLJ7F;kw1 zf?hh!V3*;UkB&{dSj`e+iDTTJVXEyA?6S%43vz%ZBj{!)%vxc1RH#i%drQ3YSSa*H zA zaEkpm!u@9AwDs4uYtu&_<>}%V{Gqwun za2KFeFSb|Z7nnWl$3<4vA|dq#rK0d$6IAWIUW!XIQzJ!bTS#o#)soe$TuUE^xG5YfWjXj5R zxUR!mU18eOSMT08@o+gC1tQ$t=Hd%56n|v-TyOwoMF?6}g9`3 zIGi(zMhKuSya?tPHR zef2bs&S@|9SI(50u}KQ9Sqp$J52=O^+L3w^Pk(X+Emt`%$UGRn7^j0n7d^TGdY^m{q`lj(1L7RQk?FKM@ zAV1gwiYX(U3EKp?i?W<62!<)dE2tU@a!ZX4F5-#vo^TrF5rV~`&<^0csh zqx0)ny9_k7CT?xmnCRdQLjQ#a#E?%c>U?T2M9(Sxq18ego+b*w@0=|ua2m*rMe(>B zCadx^)w@`GL<7mZ> zzji`ysvy6i(vwQ6$4b*z$>7$XTQ7z7k6VHuNBET_MLX1yXs17fq zzm(SEY?j8#mJkBuMCkOSFjw|xB8-FimF#VjsR^n)vqvF}|5*HxnU1#jGf|_ybkSvy zCA@zWN}8Ppeb?tSv1u-CaCoPxf1yfItvUFO0C@pI3ps3Q4yMV2MdnC7iQA`&SZF8X zlf73GG@n%-g_W9mK*f92Xc}w^`jR0Z#uaSpO@pQ1;Y|zZcvXkN!@!DlL9Qp7ajhgG z)$>1zbS|ELRI-6-Y6luV#eO#jz3c_PPx0R5lyt22S9cJpq;{t&N2<{*ZuA>Pw>P&> zdi?uqIKIlNq7Q!9(z4=JdX>&-C>bBzU5$TlPXp}krZPLxG6wC5%M-w}5FMm8jr4gZ z#~39J??wQucuf6!O}sWmzMR@wMl3Q%89&H75Dj0&^iHLHPR4cPZZ5*D8j7ak^^OBw zAJWMJUn#HUbP^!0G zDGSh`K$WS$X|&?g_$@Lk8lG!OhFJOcD;$Rd54GtvDA~$&UHht{BF(RF>POnL1@pU1 zHExrJtSqDw;~g7Lw3@jC zJ_r}U_7A8?20q3rZt?j#Zx~K?RF$A<Pp3AI*#af!psJ9oTn?vAB^F5Z} zY`J)uxc3e5f~hvPPup*6K^afT3+Sed{$fW3?y53tL1_%>sUvVG-_k9GXoSj@M+sNJ zz1YSxC%L_Hko0_BlDQp&wwivDk4*9})pyTz4%!{7uLX5W^nxC}jERWSK8XpKs@sqV zoFU)U!9fe)0n*-%x{(LYxT!LEB_6fhgttSF)j%~>aVuhQX}lPT^a=5k1|5p5bU_+n z7a>&!*#)p>(>^%OQA5{l7`6O+JZACRb?6`W{)gU*VGaGPC)0@-)T@!bAz!@TYT8QaD-Xo?Vd@+@$$wxnV?o0lntO5FGr|G{d zm_%Tsflv@J^wnHmum4mj%d<;kzX7!W;#-4CF^Yd6&1t2|bW@)D?&s#{)3zXA`I>*C zC@k;`XQ+NJe9=X2K&c9!33V3WlrMNv+fanp{HKW5V7i@CSe6N`r;RjYkhyl@W5M~3 zj?GIoda*iJ`gi)ZWIXVeQ=wH^b*^`hePlaT%y5LB{Eye@40k|2GL7gRh8| zrK31@fiqRYS-tZvZ|n22VO|ctRIIIWZ1zr|Y^(%cj^xjE^s-weERoKjRr<_aHFbID zR0imSMHN#XXAdgM4fCm`ImuPKmf{sv==v_Py3M=X^mC*S=o|r#S4DZLEJ{0)wtTB_ z7HJV4M8@~0_&LcmB6j0YQS12RpE5~eBj+~C-3=TiQ(S{P=7+l>tR=)ZkJziPP1wFL ze{w^--sz7n5=rc%iT}v@`(&+|1{|K)_$z=PC@O`f_b#Db0B^a*4QVrv?nm0 z%d`XMGT$(-QON{QB@i9MA_@NzTVB^elMUER?NTL4BTjNwyqB*B%z@Qi{VxDVK)And zvMTR~neKy%wHQN3HrF<)YlLx3eYMv8FZ;b))jq^f<53gQsd5=0Rn82vz*kqwJURy_ zv6tuw?i{r|=EkS>a17kv|;VET8 zTb%|=g6TG4b&QC&hkz zK=OKE#^Hj;h{_;l=JOdqf>wR+X@`erHSR=;39d!)djO62wJQvwKp#3sKtEVfl|!|f zQs-G6HP;hh1@<7YTyPXpVB6exE{MnGlr=>h2dft zFTdGk0himGUqrX&Q}4*bhi4^#xun&N>+bGnuqlJTsK+TM#eh<KjZ^ZY%B_jx_?9%22}#KEk^+ZQu;~o>H}rj z3-elRt$K}ZR+Zs%Hg3YSrABM3H{OUhs7H{BAtZ+ja;9y~YO`*GA4ML@BDaYR4%s+r z6#XvtRq;Xp#g~1(JsZLHjx2EPtsM3>hiz`_zTsk)W1*$=exxtzSkAKOO(kFrTiIzR zH;FypFn^J3P}W|Cj>ADYq~UQr1>*$SPQNI|n*Zr5#@MX+ZBQJQhae}as!728s&kqb z!=bc$BJx232GqvVp;zcqMo;X$Rn2Q>dFoKdhsEVr`0(>xJ)YGp68UW{k(Y74ryTG3 z8A?G_vtGE4gwjI?>Y`68f}Cvqk#D~!nJh2}(SP_0vn}999v)RSPcK{cs#u3eHpNDJ zc!Hb#*ibB2wN2!|?Jm}BB($_!38%nb;5cXOO3R;p3t`KNCcPO>VqQFl z<$p>b&{aeJQ-hg3+DD!#<)5&o?md3;4jSVSykQ8OF(%1=JZ@&{BhDCjK_|;YYec9>lr(4d+-?|;%+Y+?(|F#i`D_dIG73iNJopIfr=4&Ztxd?U zRGF95dO2vUA&|~`5PL;TkUvey)rQ^o92&ik&w7>4!_+yiaz9~W@$iCteHbYeT7M=K zSBM$tSY9+_w`i-n4_%ne{0-BvXDt%&eadDm-JKw((#HSUf>*C#T~_7=l}U|+5cLaJ z6_vTBFR#|gMdS>^t-SA`G_@V%sY$U zZnVU{`|7_H1Gyt%?dL1^4p^4g_$@8adTQa1Ar}e05!+)xj~@^Zz!Ia z`5%8i#GOq;NA5y7d1ndsU5L@9x-q2-*0Y>|=k3E;H?qd7xMQo1cCYGPE`J6u9&@er zuIepIH%qGV$PZCXc$Q5MCJk5je?|Jf3PnFaeNv zbt}#;Owyh8v~tX8?3$f}F@Ng}Y~L&r4d+F!a=p-Az(K*IL<}WVSgeJ)ow0wMF<^3; z$()`eR#a3X*5<-hJ;n)~Ss_S0BNQV}<15Fy5&90CBv{IW?RVOoC_Bab41Wxu@Y7^i zWI_PB%Jf6m7zMXVQd&srp=@9xfSPqod!Fsu%;5!Vx=3CjuBH5qJAdDz0d~2f16j>l z>*a-C%41a>NOlDy^(b{lNSf=JqP^13t1Auek#MOaF)JG|$JlhjG(IP586{`O@Yn#W z`E>JC1m=hZmg%70EE~6ivzKnTp(RvZMRpH}#~%Iq3QMGETq`a4#;{s|mVYHO zr{W~fODdApP6wh|;7mGkCW463#_e3+LHqJjT_>CM8>VC=S$~}p5tThy{Rj}%+%$W; zdC1GQO-KS$ZL0wI$1yTWXi6{bxN+~M(q}t7p{-hTVbJmOPxziWHNH+O#-3QLdzO8) zP2xMB^{knwtVvir>vV4dZN^>*h>d=l#QBB4=?jz4A)BE+kHDm_ZQxF|NPj1jv|VP} zBY~>8mk_V*c7ITiT_~xL)Vs9_AYm)a#H38YTxI=xup*0RUDI5Cqq_9J>Uj_DMJ<&h z9^>!JI8&6vbL#E~cv2MqeDdJk_wFxJ(sJ&iK^omU;}d#0ZL4G{ePN|{>Ztswwq>A5 zg{sFZmv|G*H2Zs6s!j%HzN`icO#gA}#(E7wmK(Z}e}8Cg!t`n~eK+sf44%@a6>621 zaWiL2U%mpg@wCv1!u!fv{xL!wDb)^WQEzD~$C#eq=D>{W_yPloMQX(@25N2WgtFO^ zPB6}ZFT^1lLpC&}9}`1%l*2(J2?dr@2EYzEhH6Pls6 zb?NhQt$*)kNSn?VF+5z?8XuZF$24!P?ZumTd|3T)_obZn$sP8eph&hllSpGk6Vl@+ zZ@qQDknn5|u|A#m-LXY_WC8P>fd%br)ykfhWX`3QkGziOWut-NsaNuUbp015ZT|Sl z+wb0wk`Yw_$GEo98w$IN-R;;~fwnCmS7O;YUVj~gVzvuJv9jY<$& zK4Kq$>AfE9V;zLeAW@Dj4ZPHC=m|qnq7f$*dJV}uB%u~VMkIUX;2S6awEXuC&D-4X zCWtVc7xz#I-tO8ud8l+WdnrlzEkO0K852G)|6^C4Bo__kl&J2R2rsHeNsxXCQi=!j z=6|`$71J2jAp>e|o`-FO_STV$5RJLuX!_`gQ)0M}{K;@GIzi@{t2R>cXem`l2}zn` z&g0J|4qi%orDO-Mrq+}hv;w0fljM!{#KsA-O+F6dJBJmNZPK)L#q<5)!qT9V_jS;p z3U&Vk-MJ~hI0}4)Fn1fd-4cU8i24y&et-01+WVA5&4A0S!b@(=+2uEb5^KcS$(mPs zipqZ8`6gGVWNrW6V&9jsY<6Tr!cNOY>55|K`i3=6cV{I2D(5GB}b9fP$;<<@bD}k`Wp9lhu|M@ulcC(pPy$ zdSh~>1mR({X*N;0Fl6>ooc*r%*#~G?JnE4s%n-DB)QK@=S8P(DU;Bz!e@J(e!%%Ulz%t(`5)zOX$^b;k(9pX8D4O>=BW@zYLP>$NGeg) zrl0H7H?!_p52)jtH0Z~v+G216WiyT3N}1F^cz+E7FU18u8ne#KpxAK+)WPR+_Bze_ z=u#wWGh`^%P~wcmmokn@yxCs5wRMa_)iv#ZaD9U}vdv}ERIAyGQ$v;$rhjV9i45)3 zDlemZi2#L4QWUakasc(BFz_4t4~84dUujSB;t(8ee4#SPFsqoSg&<_@Okt=J@yjR) zfj%_JZ#2MB(pT)&O3*r0rq>pny7IamnRb29)@I;!1rk+1)p!|CX}4(FvpdViPWEXI z#S+@ol}c1?I!cmy*WJR&>VKg}HmcSmI;oqE^OGput!?BuPf17H#TAsrXNRBTcpPxD z2#kFG`LOt4GUBG}CGF|FzQy$F$uJA?&P(XNo6@(mw5|_ z$tCEJ-Lc!*aM_t2XEuxDyK7XfLqqXhI}hcr#%98*NJiTy6}w&6dVgJEQ7mP_lv5D- z>Lw+TA);M%50cW$EH%oXTvs(E(L~JQU{!t*sG3@eul0pf0`kZ20p5ynY$zhn8FRD!N4!>h&ut_p7x=&wQM>wSD`VZm z*O!j22royji%!GlL`~ZcC-`d?YRhQ>jRmlqoaAsbC7o;Q?0?GPT3bi1%^sG&82a3` zm9a&8(U!ZwTiaX97rnZ1bam=;aQbnk%3$sU8$kU5=xC>jAQX()h{oIVA`Nn zoLq6i8q-e8x_`{%6RBzheA}j5mZqbrgXu$YIjajJ?^;hp4X7`?vBa`f?qda6<@-b+o9Cdy}NZ_+xUbj;V*A9^TB_W1Y-6%%eHw}}7*qy@@%RCQsec1f_726b|^dG5F9l+`y)|%)p@%esEkm8O()Ny&`I$wZC7k&#QLQ1r^|F5#NO)Qfwd$GZ!fT!M zYb}1^ZhsmF`rMqH3T5h8^(6eJBuu9n+E3p<|$i?Yode55Y?zNz@qZ}@u`uKav( z3dt$1`>jWh-@dP$c&FoVxrIUEcn;S;io&&NOy~~Un&^Mm_fKP_MLa++s0=jneT_fj!*0i9|J@_bqVD!>%C}-Xz zm}SBW(BmIf2}wr!p76-l7zX?fCS-<5*36gaQd`!BcXbResj5pnTlu1?9I(Sk=CIfk zU4K1jF2AN#wD`94Ohd5|b02}rmuM$jRUt+Rlom3YyNy<~<#mey#_wU6#%@}j!7>3A zZY-Bz6RGK*uZ$sVFbp!5LlvWI(xP{tFB@^$Tk3FBI6TD<1(3s1hXubtnH4pdXtB58Qx znsgz*Ad>)Mn~C~#ykA`7Wdp5RS;|(53JHYC)^)qKb}cWb)u3{08a58d>y7T(z<*dY z2_{0+q$+i^1KGoi6%=d`w>o!C}9P72ImQi1SC48ta5} z(Eadc3{ygv3?S=9r^vCxT$ZI=*?*QKom{Jy;o zN7SOL;_Ta9%HWwhSh#zIYN(mi$et&C=S4MnpTLYEIrt+QJoeQ*p_+T6WDuA(wdt~) zbtWtnQ2Ay%9pGN(^Bz*#E9&GPx{C>uoWRx1Rp6~L9i&VX-+Q?JwoD)7@_**De{BLl zmRT~ts(WvY#PYX{MizS6S9OAbde4IdS?phhX##TJ3V;|-G)W1-Q6Oo z{uduWo7I3Iy^rjk>La{*ZE0cTCXG%n-O=8S`L|VNiL5X$0f($8H=7=0!M<2&@uF%| z=7{Syr?VKJ+8PZQVkZ2hg@0Km34k;!D{EDGlh{=$4)JXgW2x1HKXvgLQvCTmQ zPsnb2O6$#@vWjb449Pr{kC-z)e)q{EeB$wwpFQFv%_>UhCM_1RCKIbL6v;^v@L{3# z=*gOs)bA%}Iu89~0$moj#p4_vHtOx}rWn#D8iu2E%f?3+4n? z=W|u|+h$CK8A2^(Rj~h(UME?FNR^U4yxb7nb%Oh$Q@izHch(yhg_SM&amCZCUEUJc zju`_34*{_dR&7wB#hOgH35gENoVH^Y+eQw2`)|dSPQY*fYV2Kwf1m-VqZY&jM&bst@o?zbyVyuIAnm4-cbSKRv6PZht_O2-xJ4WM1%%08J8I z5l1Gi)b`XsV#XS$U$ba$bXC$Elxy+K`JzOvHl}DMR3tGgnGhj!2fehi&WAZ=0r<;^ zAvap8Gev%ml?2Rfi|%eUE*+*?2Tw4} z?8~Hqlc8!HynnvV4RDMU9GJeMB5s?s)0CT!trD|Z_2D)TyJqUT?d^-)IdZQimlf77mhtjG#xy>tRhPp8aF$On`bZXd zH=2YO2w(kHFB2yb21f^sf>u{Mj05|Hl1jM%b55VZm47$3W@c&H6>S48;8`?l{GHh8 zne;a#V~s;gB}@~>VfItMHB~Dg{ax}T2XN>g$!%Aj`I0kW^?9sSzk-8rFk1CrM~+F9 zJ3HB{vIA9eVkgfXnc{`fS%-dZ^k54Sr&pB3VaX0Antiz0_RJa@M z&4wA;WPfTef3xzC%)_SC&C3A1+;w2^QM*AFY~#byOg0J8ub&)gOCVWL3uS4~oYlEI zDo$bd!46E^RJP)rGm zt>YMrCA*JRenMW|O%PVqLHBZSqFDn#5y&JIp9a8Bxj=JUoVdI}2Q2xU`)az1+>7%B zdhM!D#uyn40-%%JFloGZ9LD~+{J?M6-*-cl{TEqBi!DVGHX7pA9s#h_T(Mh`dDW)m z@PF{%<(PR`W~Ijc(9q->x1Hm&kHa7bQ_43yQF1kosbwXZB7{jr+Mv20!<5NgDJS2S z$(TtyxfueJPZ;!;ZO_~5P|R|}XK`jaLVTv*9{W+5e~uiy%734g{n7_pWD+HA1g<3R z%~b1ff<;VYRFu_<#8o0S#=nx_ZJ|js%YT=%1QfL=E5|1^?j(tE{|dCVKJQp+a+%v0 zHXGWS3#=qlM;&f>KPf(NRAUfKq+>BnbmQa%z*H4J^cMB`SP}=ybYG+{>;3Rvm>SVX zARxY*khk%+h8^*3L|d4hria$v)Evk4>Y7;T8T#FoW)z*s7j}fvrMS0zp81ppz&7|&O!}CdDrF3>gqIr z5Tl0AMLC68FZkMeF?S0gYmH~t6NK#BlOOwp?V3@?cNbWGu9L%CNwE+){-@7+GKt%P8B*ng=-f=gbQ zDTo`rnP;R&2cCiDupHni#_6z*MGEFVJTTFHCp%`2mfWI)o|QD_kow%? zURw#waB%ZU2WA(_B4JSOSIkN%wPMYM;R!+w!sq zNry(KvvJ7D!Nyf{D{HVJi+^O@bCP+5v22@7)nAdk(rWC=X1w1UEZ9f3k09*6HJR_q zt=8%WTibnY_=4v{!5aa_Dc2rKktPHT zje}ihuG?EEW03a4y!#Q0HFFEc!!`?ZHawdv5lk|gZAN*exPMmJ*x;$8{7lLEm7&Y{ z;^Ts%9=Hesf@JiTPWg| z{6Z3$&9;Ks))3#OhsZAKeI;r^Mj^lvB=d6<{92Qy)aoe5C)4S|D6F}T;zJ|LzwO~WGhU2oTa=oc{tjh!l4{uHAm zb#5{8-Jg|%@_Seb_}Qa{37qJZG3c(9A?QBA1&$%3Imx^`wbI*(%kj$SY+XwnQXM-3 zB%0WENPoLMR3RrHoiqUBHSJH7LD6V9jRX_$ZJWiyIb0fF#Gg-Td12`u^2K&y4ZDT( zTNwTNO=BIW?belBu0RLJYZF^O;lYC&M~{uJ8RU1Jp}I}zs`3Ssi~YFtiZzSm1B;ys zl%Z5KIEQ7NT)zEfv ze*E5hKf8a|j`qWd_DC$D_55?AxLlLUBzA`#4H{#qH09>?=#Gb}AsIhTta0Xqa+osB zI!CqGOD^OTcneR#<<#}SA;LDFb*w=AdCS*4TAN_HZhl7Em} zdSIkG@+QiJb_XaHc?Vd)Rlh{Ur4mUBWerh>h_XZ@ePds3(H+L*4*uZC>xN2g@tK&x zetpU%GA!!PNlOmX9bxs)m8bc!*w-?s**<NUB^%pj@;pj zp!oyqWC#LFLr_?{{L9vL7GC-^jDM8nT(+*>SN$*dOk#40j$x>Cv_H&_r}Uoo%xa+k z39Ig2lo?j~r-49ITXQyb<}QLb<}MxKhVf!7(-L%rzy*C}pf1eyy)nW)hCL6`xH! zLDf9?Xu15d_%8s+e+%W7XE>4e;)bBz<0o%FzVo2;bAa)ynMw{ROZ|D(UVkALe;p%0 zwm|mz)EMQv#m;Qx&WgE}Q}4`}Ai*@NnwoIWg58M^92KQNw@%ij5|Nf;vi>`t0K7F02PQcm z#uo9N(1va=BvLFoW#*LGb$?*%JV;2OKQaX9brMpsV6O1xA^ih<+f=% zo9YXfS8Kzt#}+3?4r1uak4fwim!i0Skh(wNdQg?*)Mzc+=@byx8m&pka4;Xt|t<&j&^dlp=FB0eNV&$&;5h&I@uT!Ys0V>}mSDO}MMJkrw zUvHc=Vm0&wQ-%`OYJcp}*4Dl3)+}@cap-7`jcO*gx^}-y65CaZy0N7>)93(`z#5)i zHN$W(>Rqp^I4g)WsER{Yls^pt0-lI>qC0v|c4;1tq=S~dKB82Ygwd|Du|7UnJ4&q7 z>RgW_7W=HZc;iYHj?|-dZ@`U@g|?FKHKE+Qk@hX;inqO zI#0(xHl%ag5UEjNPpci(I8%8#4P^RWcjH%n8S84!CC&Xj7YTyDWnkLrCv(GK)6yOmu`0;|fJnm!(cS;Eit3KNp@$+NGI_TG_o3sF&TpcgS+gj%_2R>5thJAUQks05m$=SM{>2=k$;w)p5~R{n9G{4ri5(5l=FEM zv4$16#~RXFmKe)63w62J39A*Nw%D%aWE%N-5N^E1TwjIaM3^>u*C`ff?^t(IX7@@} zE_91}Tr!Y^EGd3)L(HX2Teolq#%Z)8=6pXTGx;M;B-ZZSjHvXcH{5v%Lzd8kAY*N` zhJh#;zkim+S?g{^7F0F`Iq-)qQl%tDHZ@_FC{|$kZGgz}k5Fi_?&Sc!GmfmQ6adeJ zl#6?b#`66|@xM=H-(M8JEZZ+QA+EUhyxbuK{k0tPJ`%7nK<-}DU%pSk5NsGjnYMko zwqUt7LB%}$3wAQae#QOtn(>X7e_5UBixJPtS$|xS!d2Mx6t)n*{qsc9=(PiyRYYP_ z8zW%dO@9K7dN4C>lj2o=RMKmjXy`we+mE?eOMMu~SL)oz__7 z+80!=siMo`i8e*?NpO5ZPx3VmD$&rYBD0*Do47e&7mpvs{x{uvJA6^Yl4ax#$!U8?iNp-wr{6gu*us*Uuwa=)hlh=q_wL6**5<7= z6`jxGhzhxw)3lqQ(qMum={}}l%uokOnb4B4jxmXc9Ny$DS5*eBjoV6FKCY?(?z2u8 z(l&%6Za)@(-copy9hgl61HjxZb!zFlM6V;Yigd77cUTMOK3~aDGs-H$p?0}V4$R(jVM}BisCQe7l56*Hn zDP2|7vgL^N%sp>ovP;Vd6Mw{PD4Z!QO9$$IU2Vz3d0j2??1a83)Hd}^<<_bf!=y#Z zeXDG~mO4HAOnbbK%Rm`@Jh1g}k}cG3gq|G}aTp{!aVDP=8|OdsljW?>L|cI+N@0<) z_qhbA7Q!D@!!4#UZ&J6)kYbZqPGMpnc!b+5p_7S;h4DzLH>85)gMS3u)m%K#rntCU z9kPyd6XtiJzt4W7fA3L5jswFGYeh&}EH{b2F0^f8^&7S(Mt$?-RgQ&WXJ%5zRSOtxKf;y1*{jGtA zhgz_OQ-+sMsxc8$`N)jL8jU4(VlK*C=#<~(Ge|@7lSrudZdgbJb?T@k4U!0D)40DGXWL1r_#kiaLaPBeRJV3)NEyO$%^o z)sZ(cBU;4yHc7MO4Sf#E2z{^2M1ZLVl?^dL9uyr;(0|TbY=O8Y$iKc(=o*1KXHfRh z{3NUj&fIB^Yt})PO_hJHM((!segJAQs-3a>1&y<1JH|M7v_6$Zpy%M3QM}j$iWfyJ zQ%8!ci?qIOFiFaHODHjOf|RMDMqMCvt@DrBcq7DXK}cfWTBy=MH77?}u3xTwJ7bZW z(dhLqyMMG1q8>1{oGLv=;GQLCxgp|I-1{CGjF_oC#a12v<7d?k2bcfwKfURZd!2Ua ziDp#AoLb%M5oe=2n0j_YZROER;^SzE!WdAI4Ed$3Qv3T<7Os=?C3wjKv;N1I-e zLVsExrdCCcIE|DYSf9eyPC_m%w0Y=hVHi8>-jCi~0e}n8fb3gUzgAsr2zWL~Qvy%( z#zmd|E z;&WdhKwgCB-ctBHo^>LA6G_2lw~lzW2!9U{Pkdw6GR|1EAnry6_^!>$ht>3wgz}V0 zGY`S4cB^pFaakPL_2sH=qnvRb^fFsMDdv5ecK>K4xoWKICv<8r>tNRPoxulfvsB3ai5TPC&x1Hu70|BNw1Fj|0?tf!d zT7PY(u3K*VdetFOMft1VK-*4yf83Kw-?0chS9~`KHExQ^!=yLjHWji8|BpRTBq+xmx5|;Fz7TF7JhtJ}RjDFBOtd*?U#- ze@b$=JIv`Z6kv~lchbwv$Ur$y?3SEOO9Ql~TH^*B;T zMa*oh+C~`^t#*ac&!~VJg^0Jcp-HT9ovU#%Gj3BpkBjqBO4m{8H_p56+zNjl`g(%K zM$m27OjMO7eU?M$`jJhrqc%{Go;+l~lbH9YK+(eFiRxSC-cHyRY-}XRuslCzw_qTkB|2iOuItyX`WZ%1`f@yQQEbf%V~Ty$xBd94i?P(x zqwZvx9V3;gP7}bJnTF!>|9{q~Si!XTh)r|Q$H?jeOwu(Cc4Z+akm zls-2qs(xp)XXPrit{ikysSdK6nz3vFTixc=_G^kknm{DshTrC^N|px;GO?0B9$1ii zzY=x#HUZpi62)(uETNCZ61NPE&MhAdu781iU(FAk7Y`6-rx5((BY)E$(|_}K(s{)h z$4nRd5zDpBwRg%0IiFx;0f*`?L-N;2CKe2eLOWi8PP-zHJA2%!s$a26tR~!t8lPgY zjyx6ivXvmi;(Dy|3SP*G$b#RlwhEH3x>Z>?KQ1e>u{O*&tY&WX9&CFb6ch|~oU}H~ z^5*!?4Q*P0Rm&^ELVq^=rMvSov&qJ3f#&6?g$KQA8sRvo`G{u_Dq^R^`11I@SakoW zWqUHc{2piaXw%}6=Md}mC!Pn2I@|Whvyfv=C&7?71B_Ykcn-AbRy~l=byB#DUPxs~ z7jY!w>dcrI4bTYZ0~&4AA_?t`(c#f)uT-8|KTYQk6!(nP6@SHTGZ|_??>?^LUXWu| z`KNB$)kbcgw5{X*BKa-KW@`1_2MO2-&y=9=TxI9bFr3%qD2D_`RHGps#~gxBWosE$ zlFmWT#w#7SC*riW+=WhuVU-(N-z(ZX7%6D?=v>EV`bfq@_0uXJyXD_Z<`aaPCF@NU zH4$r@G#f*E|9_&6f3lygV)&Ke$${U(2qsi~|PwvKa*Y?gHa5 zqZy9D0DrBN9eGv`Dq&=O5p9P=^|Vxqer?14yT02Ojj1!B(V=b{lpXo{M(knTSO@au zzn;U_@C`be(rCwWIwfgY@&>hYBqk%-jy0R=C6osO)`(@_XZ-|6+(e8w%aBG^oldJ0 zB&BQHZ0wt!_oL(%A=H!Tkdv<1Gr0?dh3hJwTz@)Q?YQ|fNeX;OLQHOFqkYt%pcW)u z7i3laG}?eZ!1n5WtnA3GAREu@U0-kI!t~}Ptk%$a7KR(&SVYgHbWGeN#IicGhT&N< zTp-Hlb(2%F(gY-97v#-(3@$Ae4qSEf#V7z_^t&;Ek0LW#e43^plzmK0dosk#`yF<2 z^?&t&(T|J7Dpuq7$7-KN0CMmMNSm-M93?YhWh#&%E{#+y?C3b_D2Ze9*u!-+mHVp_ z;eig3bl;am+q0Rwc@tSI1B+pAjEssISWUT8ss!;Rr&M|gEu`!G$OhvzOCvfwwFyCr zrP}@0di1Srv0o$^PGrr7-hJgdFK{8G?|+kD!VTc8@?K|A`7j!&Pn(p|x|&`V=MoIG z%#+i}GlYzd<|P5OD&?AL5Gyybg}DQv)PZLQ!Y_CYysMHvebYx-n`DA@AWJ(Q5NFM# z{nL8q6S{UfWm7_!Wm9i0dWs@u%}l0OKBx-58Zu1Fq_86IHKAAC@#;vmO?!3NB7X=V zCQOGV;>+F&vmdVT;o?f(5s=0N>9Cu)G2QwBVwb%nxi@mY#O}n-`7GDX=cVh6Ar4Kk zLX*ug4xLC^5R050d&JpHjL>Y7>s^F6@~+)V>@HnkjPAmAcvJ6cBb)29(PaZ2m_+l) zT9C9}dLPa2F$t_};8B4|ltDKw$G=BnJ7h2@lbHbR~4^Sj=|AIZIK z52kPlXlaZo11-XoRNT+BbQuG37vpt{NEc>>gfdlK3ovGIMDo1WFqO8qQqja&Dv`j1 z9J%fYiy{Df{8NEFbOEugPJb0it^8AB$d?Yjn-6cgZmRMXj!(uNU3+E_`p|nT;b?fI zSfwfe`Vqo+G;lt`Sim`)U=Z@^zOHhVj}x>)`^HUYnDIP6aF81kprIqK#0nRHpbw(7 zTBoj<@~+N6D!OSOfDRO~#u!6i#1hp?|H|kzcfTKt6$n!$i|&IdjDIFk^+J2oU5z4{ zY-~l>{%=g3I+jluvyZH*&S}7&GEkl<&dAMr(Omf>^U$*d3GYV-k)=y`E8Wg>BlW{U z$|m5*Br+|yFN%a&z_%qVm{e97X9sO9m3YuMcgqH>w*x}ynlvhTHe|orhg}>=u=0`A z3DPV#QqJc@T)Wi>8-FLMGZ1~Ys*du&-$d}tO%4eFHO~?2b{awMr5;|ACWf+>s^r3j z%74#MZEP%0Mi|e^zxDyEA!QTkSYPIY=DKzv{cD=5Iffpw*MGfagz)`Em~>q6G9J9P zLEA$E*>Ly55aIi_0K@vWPf7M#GMIH*p*!fR5Ic z(GIg^oy^amAb-_PM-@w=a?1H>==3!N<m@}p!(I_=z+>K2apy;G0 zPO}K3Pescx`+vkSp#sLp$PKo>y@h-8abdRiWvaO2e1sd~Y=%Oe$$6h?8k_gra%wE{ z8X_%X_Nj?$Jr)RI?|R2;zLqPrg!MX~Wy07W(rL+flj5 zGqfhfPc=us5}&+2$j*2D+8DVo!HQ6B8n}zeMkNz|>wgn!SzO0qrH2@{+>c3GlbCtk zyu<@Ot}vo*UbX27pxJkTE~_VK|r=pk>E{ zDclCQLE{rgxmJ=_iOu5C014a5;_|c)1>0uFb;@5N78lbc%y?E6;W%!>sZD$Ahzzn% z=$Hs2RT#*EgA5gM%^->qu5Oq2{fmV63=l{+Fn>ViL3L(*mytKqG}M-esJm%waEi5} zRO^ejw9@3nu%5zC0bx+NM(Z+~MOas6A5(pml-#-U2w*3$OBCoP^r(ifY+G{i9zS{a z(Zk{s3Vl_p8hAI~E@aUANn}Uo#)^tpoEB z-+wx34)r?^-+K77;=8Z@TzvGhBB&@gN6urr3pB=5skR zX_Jk|%z@dsn9q$|#8zov{3%9h#&E~El(niim&$nYT?*DVzU}qTVhFnM3;(mX#Mb`I z8w$~0;ay9*_YQ(A@SXC*o5dBDFHmUDedYp7Nou7Dmkz?I#^M@}cdP0ZiX2&$RDbMO zvgF%5VNDd15pHi8YNe%-kjqJ^Rola`$$i>Yn3gO;uo*@YM@>G@e#^KA`F;8$0cCu+*s$SKqeq72U zZFMisgbA_N!4Q8xrE;cQ5DP!3Ie%DKc-KkHN9~qv?#FTrKSn`moHEH{>Nu+1BUuRX z)CcXhsbtZe)+eF!oEZg_tA4(oxo+FCxxkoGvBAnd42glsGLc?nQq9JXo3+kF0^7YL z69B#Leh5dbe4-S)gBC^?u`TIYO&s=03*AFN;upjt2u2JPZS8iUcjDLGk_+XNt zn2`@u3;Uv&`Xwre)PMevTEQ@Fz#2&v?uQUsjYFdUx4nGjVqPFH)oYce9qZN|q%*`N z3m#pRt9FU|`K(Kas}dPB=oVeRT0aC^uf6=2lCj_?<*={%4h`o&e{WIjAAbAw3q3ckYC4SfGh6eiC1{)^WH^82E9a zYq057ioS_iPzDJ9i5zko(iVX`7c^1?Cfg-S>DIAvVYKWTUSm`^k$?W&CiwV>nN>GJ zVO|zdW5Zc==FGYZ<9Te^VAKnqsXX!Xau2KSx^erdX*5vqzB-*FU?>mgHtx?j|GdaX z*!Wb9B%gTqy+_7!)y;chqaqbKX#&}W=_=V~hf3=DXqT6NQB8OgAxXA*g~TFp|0{t;gH;kbkN+G?UH!HH8!dbi4hCullHI?DekQA|#WwPjQlw{#AuissSsE z6BjxyS?HH-U;&a~+!)PO#SkcF9!sZkZmmtbOJun;AUVE;f=B({D+d`oNbKdLNFHPL zGDtJmgNIc~)45`kO08tDDz}Q!A7)DVpqdc(Os>s%yPQ9*Md*sB_?zMukv*$LiE68} zw;mQBV*5OP^5`wsxQA@MF8E~s8qH5-Qc)dK&uQAXa^272AGXz(<;9>wvy>()?_ki@ zKcaD4U&nEb8-IE3T2|0hZf#PpJ2v^}<9Bd~$3It2!mv>Op|U2lJOY~Dpfx+)9)l|N zDgvPl#>q%rJB5Ae1Xp6D&nj>9#n`)unI!vq;ow?BG;KMJW{x(swrmV8usAGSq*K>f zJ}AXRJ-^{NvV?ESK!pY|5vX5~1JG*^qMYCdVkCAYbbl9F$t<3uEyRXh@WzC4pW?4bO24-y(o9=?XD zHS2CdDeZsq=+f69)+)w*)2L!)MQ9C?>Va}nRytTjG_5x56(ZBNKdTrO(Ph}Y%`s?v zynk1>;D39v#_c9>ll5IvLy?6SY=f5Rpr10h|I_ydMOmhaB09t;IWJS}EesYF9?rgR|?EEl+9jw3r)V>C&$8R>d2itgwkgJ+YBG?A%KX!I1js*8I^ zEPwrYlvC0>)EOc>h!=pWk^*Pib+XWf?eri;&Qu?89fMeXT{Q&gZ=pb}OcaY#dDDrV zYaFlrNk$juq=ZsW!zP@L<+;u~Qs~2_4Rk03yIeHCo}~qx%?EryOKBggKx3)1QdMXX zs-Z2#&}{~@m9N)T4oOT7PChI?N36+IMt^r*l2)zCL?_%~6{V_&=^C-56dqgWU9re6 zaTS&cD%h%!^^ZZ=einknI;^&!D0~r-av<2s(US}7#*4ic<7+LVIXddM%Q711b;aV$ug;vk~S7rq5%@B z42xMIlU!@Ztg~UJ30`2o%cq;QV8@yZYpq8ZDadro#=Tjte0vV$d7b);q=t21VPC1a zSw*dC{YhyGs=S_6kIBD7b^}#Odw;ToT++E!-#rMF`i6+0b`zTtpj9&>i;eoBOck_f z1*uqhL5kVot>7)zXrU7d{vPHy?2ltPULQ?muxRooUyOZ zX(EZ!E(e252slyb-2PBNXJNCJHa@3OyNYd~JH+DK$(y+{Y{#b-k`se!l{NeI^JrET zIF!X^cx_o**Gt;bX{9ZqKs!va8>hZcYhOx-q8|?gL#l@8+tqH_UuY~PHtU?C4fuAP$-;Y$7^7?fEn_+i z8K=lzV4$6M9Gawzrw4YObL7&2E&OF!i^#nbVNF>|m;c`0`38R$mLN=2YYlkAsAU*EGu9b)|x&w>h*Al zd#laEZ@>QbU*386&VA!R5zL#hSkgEOvnb(In=R__XI3__(8&}`UA(kQ1v;a~izdoG zFxU(PQPeaKt61C2$X!|ToKVff@sBW=`nwOllr-yxCKI{5^*DN^u{D1`7?V-h)z}ee zMo;&s_3yybS%Yk^H!*n0s`#u%nW2N(j*KnHp-kA83Yuk#0@!vgbYO#VqQ2g)d|?y656yoF#J8zUXl({q?k?!1 zn6dYozn_l@G+aYHw`Av|7fe$RxQLyKq}s|=V){pzAspYq<=*0&|IlSsTnd4*IG!5> z2sGuaBt@rLs*vMmn0Eg5eN{ce6v0)^i6(nXQ-4>&*#CWbQ9M7J#<8isl%GG-ut-q> zJT$Qj+-3&)$Vq?pMt7$6f}Wj*pfd*LK(U%wIL>&I)QwUCO?=)}@|1krYUQgk0YTQ_ z!67-qaDOhx`2>BhoCp8u*~K6>vnieh&BkscMzbpZ(Dh%`?Y4MEV$)E31Uan>otTdI zpDBGnZuGP%wH95s$$dW_mR^WmcpJPIWjcKK)juD)N#B2c_21Hd>!zy%*Uh*>ADfI* zWm`rO3MzwiARQoiwGS8%*9mT*EU@%vXt;cE^*{b>4JJoTYYNTA!vTWp2?+kv2z!Uw zDn@Mu?E}@xg=eut7!?pc8u~e%^0J6^tA(}Srt$~*uuiN;`L@CRkyCSvb|Vge2)L6^ z9#evo`$B&gowNvEQjVnQIHMJ1BVI~vJ4kw&$hYJ&+f_!KZ!*yZwz+#ZVCMfk&I^FZ zF!iC*qVb5=y;0a%%-}?GKB+}F#m6;JVsG$`>LL6@kHOw(I@Apjhyu2jlNvt^<?9#5k zAiMF=eMa=>C}JmfmOmi7AO5!m2T9M{heJE(RSbcfimPOA8`zaS->UUQJF3z$0i4EJ z8fjq8mCjvt;og~AwxP$$?2+v4&Bla^Slo70GQNUDcP)3S9&WcO>Dn=`$wnEto-1$` zDVu+!7w2u)tmXNwQ$eZHo0BBREhj8^c_P}UhsRkg8CjB~D&Gm*f9{Eo9)9|;`20*B z$ly8Zv0kmD!!rN%QM(nBcb5CH(`uzZM;L)fpwiq*M@(_|Q)_az+w-~#)i^HyMaiQ( zcEP%yf=3lTA`9DhjKcuPZJL@kodY5X32T2q9!hhI%3e9Ed%0NnMy2k_OPlbLQQ@YZ zor`6^tViz`K%t7_ZX9e<4S^~;D1?|j^fc%k;cYdn4P2O9&<3}GMx#`P$yprNBE4DF zs?Kk1T-F|B=n|(V=`a)xtod2r^Tb6B?+DIHk?b&h&B5wO?rn6?uj6D!+y!A5tocaqFjwqhGRk9;f5>K z9I+L$s=#=7@S7P*8PDPzg?BQvG2abZ+G1e>(BvqHL5AMBcBm!fY`riaj}I$biG7UVD#ZM#TqFwPh`jZ?xq(7pv}^)|-l)43jz++i+=lxnYkh^g$&rCn*xRdM)J(k_lZN`GBxGmLISBkSQ`E4}+NWgONNR&`sA!1qf3$xwOnU?2 zbpPux%l8u+_@YQ~(2rxqn50Y2sML713zJJ@2Xb;v9DGQTqucHpiUjsh<#M>g^`J5% z-zxmHsl_sZ(K?$1?j5tN`0~y_&@5efnFr>5CsbS-j|RHCSsTT?pkw7aBE>@c9<27=oXE;}h@bn32OGWJCCRh7*xw*5l;@>PMUhOs;G-M}UAdl0>d8)Rs zBhl5%a;Lo(D7qrw{!sBcZ=ky<1HF_{no^}1#2mZTVR3Xq3WrLM_hQ8 z^rBQI2bS%ouUB(Igxr7o7epd0%ptz!4Y0_}Ft_D4aW-$eNbV|(hTI=?EF8pht(b<& z`xd$+sI>T~m{8cxFq2Rm^DZMKca0N(OhVBxE~7<3x>wHafmoMisiY8fCvDQ{*9M$5*%}IaXJLCmff`qD)nBA)tQSfH5CIZO zNB>nd46pu&5K4cprQ+!nhUs1B-*gTMoqs(AQEFzfIfNuou96`g2@>d z1ZGadQmhmJAmrI^Ab1L@3LrsMx?_JQ>#|v;V_)hi`MXZ?3pv)u)sB?Q)y^4dNI`+$ z)SUS$y^EwsUB5-v*R9~3#akiCxrA;F9N-d3RBaV6(*1qa{_^P%!p_y+u*pviAdEX)5>ejkDC^n#`DX!mT-EKzkm$G>`%P)PuC$8_}mqSu5(|KDgs zDE)cLF#gAsTQ=5^wFM#oLU{neQ#Uv34*F+a&s3MtnFwug8Ze+Y-gwX^gUFFwi>7PV zwq{!*t#}xqN%^>`NQPb)56Ny(O8HGEp`A08F~@%q)`p`IRf|osrY6uZYJ+JS>^wA; zu%J_~EGHd}y5RK#Zj3Kw@k$dffDE(f$5R{FnMtXfrFJIk;EMoS+3$K1TEUQ~t@RW^ zG98D%WUU~h82h1Itm&PHiHGv97(&xiMVAni-h8R4C^=6H{<54yruX`lXrb$)%EWBU zh4g>TcknJ4D9hg!`HXxAdKb$7NmFrLos6?|`7VRAO4_ZXFfCK2mLBhJ?y^6&qJf3- zl=kwCjF-k*PMFi|Pm10LD$$|IqIlRGVxv{l)GV$o)Tim}NDEYe;VHu37N`)e)biV) zRgI$B9*16m={)Azk&?sed{|!sy&K4nW8Xh(EwoB?{KxEE0j_MImaHfDrDPCvg>(5X!e$RJ?2}L7QSrW zFJ)P^eUGU6?9`Y*Y@-XLAw}@f;8i)7-N^vv#!!tHn!#-9h*m)m0`W~@W=vzHj8uP} zhT>>064_rYalML12{I5s?cWk86K#w-@OH4x^gtR%UopsYb zG*s`K!vsW*&&o^+fsLKuXu)IZ8g75SjRB@N^{}DJDKbVOJGJxqn0KT!3}z}ZnWv%P zJ=WSuO$jodM z>4Mu=L7Lv%1lm2Yw__t+TjaLU_*RKY8U2%Gb;+~=>z?l6xPA!Ix$x`=?7Jj^b2S2ax5{2Q*^c>-a@?P?h?*Q~JsZfx~|aSZgBwgRCJb zK(D?>vn;DbNpN$4;ST%z+{k--HAfI^)T^o=ErXVZ zKB*?lH_T7SIs__SV6i3MZB5!F9fQ1fz)Zrc1d&jsdGSPiY)sz0_C95*t$p7I-dO6H z=^6_u`dv@2{;W+HW2=S*?80e2d{VDMXSWS#NUE?{PNY?7!6bhM3qf%d6Qq{JZm0D( zIfzKhdTR*0a@vtnn2ii6`WB1yxi@V{9&TQSHJ#f$(o@gP#iFls0Z~(3^DKfHO*geS z7hoK~R%w27v?oUW>D+!m2aHo zIe^>$-5fK=4M7FZWA#v!J$AV7$fbhbo`elSVy4YHnV4-9Y*tr>=@ImSi`6c@Gd4;p zmqSzDjZe2Ryw{lto95df%UMVy?|;SIf4yToyH+wUla7DdfvCEoP*|*JyKF9UIZKYT zr;yjkM`#CI+BTIqFEsRYsyl7}TOkw$;WQ8HGOJUk1>P)EaS5xz{Nw4b8N=yohHP5IbsKf#1{l)%%p$FJUU529%9=XEXIvY$7?^t!yNcI(xP zD>-WGb{p~$&-RbvugJ*S$vy=F1E`*^-@Tcq_0LjT-LyS`9Fzf*|4q3q#RIH!rert$ zS=UdBVv=o$LA@bz6v#26KP|(5B05$zQ|78stIB_^&}YB9oXuM?8=&gymM#I?4vGgA zbrlf)8I;pwtmqn<61M(YwLTVSz_r}%nU9FWBM(SFsNeF&vMuu14$XUg6W9hLU<+mn zgP@J{wn%)sg73n{3JC!yY;^h^E0dKgIUpn$p7g`bq^HkQlF3vvLkDoez;B~mm2|=` z%&vc%j;HBAo~=OTt8gJq5QH0@j;)GDMYT~?Wa<-|p+EKZhqi{o$Bik?l+Ur| zC=k3nTz~quu?awkt4aB=X5;_S58vVxf9x2bT7168bN*6)ry?y3RBaqZP$Nw=4NK*9@wuLGM^8@vbCh2JrCDyzdK($ z*pfdlt#<1vVDRz#9ft3)!mv_YnzUy5PAjtqOk;l2QOAKWd~Lhb84gjjvv^EsXL@I+ zYN_E^3&=ayu&Nm>yL{Jg(Mj9~+79(Lg*J()Y;|eZt%RE89qqF#H|n9>ph!-|^}2sm zp=72s(xFqcXyZCCD2?eUZ#AazCo)`W9MD%s>DyEDmdZQo;T3$Nw|7-DV;ZBr7!BzY|yO z7&xe2{P+=(>P-DhL2;1ISdR2Wx@l9jQEU=BAwTlnM7 zQ*)Bbo%{S)v-G)D(P^z&5DN1z)Jf`%61Kh0kBJ!w&Rk{$sAOMm zvvwS-^cMn*X@9Kr3G3~sRK8lG zO8e##i~5KK$Ol{WV&vq%xsU&$8P2E5;k!%o8ep<6GaVf=*V@WK3#Uk8M&@4k0xM3Y_GtD~P2SGSi9x6FLrGMqu1SrJNO z$vYm61h~oUSch$~PfN6`L9FP+GdG?;1Sr%G3mY&9K(kyLodz5_nU?GaUA^qiZpJ$% z?>Cre>;Qa~Oa`}9)8K!U73l6do&QvS@r@+$U!knw2v}5aA5dVWO;O{4Z9GgH!~aA*p`~Mx@A$wX*{*#@e8L zgEP2r59s9noB`9uR(JK4N`v(9DHi@Qz#rC%ol7{ zkjcEcPpS(5{peA$E1~K3=ksV3T9qq>{Lnb%77Is=(&4oq<+-nG#)L;2du8)3Jwt-A*OPx2W3S&oKgZjg@10BU zzV#H<;>WJU!m-P|zr;?&3QZ2wXYc+*#B}3Y1eNn_qas{uoo+99J~i-qqO5K@^?UXf zk5b5(W~7{XwQGux^~Riv4&RTZq`B@`*$PcJtK`q-sxyCkN@-qD3c~;tUKW|7S`1qf zS$8frTKZ!KAKo&&PGs)2{7Yqt1knIz3@Xd{g7ziCusYR#Li>We^~m)RCKKc#=Oe%~$?D4d37 z9U$ow6qbLbj2uHPL82xSu;vEY~sFMwM2xbiVH+L4y+dU{`*wFC8$4tnTSGPAzq z<5fLE^-rvi@+MzGobL0r4&eWsmmGXxwHLK{^=H|;C!C)fNN+7*jmMiO@fGH=#+-$W4@*Vr?ufE@M9?k}-L=ooe>BQ~l zmGA~D()EkhB8N8e3emF=Djp`lHY$D4+U!n=nD}^t_$}|dfQSjzNs;QCdgcSP8!>-U zB&8aBH7LUI#PLqh^u(xQe~_lL<@x35I-~DTJR{9oI(xZ^%GE08bX&}PCa4_3gX?tR zoO$9xwL1a_qQmNq{!JwTR zRsA?|B9+FmQHFQMq7kx>2W`&NHzb=NA;R#R3}#Vb=#39|9r%5lIJrRB*Gl@`IZ zF1b;)ct;@>nc|iF>tAHs2nQ-{%dz2)PGghH)~c~<3rXfM5-cj0HvGBDNEv@Hi|Mn` zlDUuwG9Q#(mUgzB(`a##=V4B@veV~D#q2V0d;v&`WuuJtWL(#4C@ngd>y>{xzKTfd zj^=S}8bG`x&Yi9+LE@s?5{R;f-9hPa7RW`i^6?{(ovmeK&mPAu{WkhW2_ejusFnrj!dmbRR#6W{c=@+!^Zv?S6d6rj7? z1IKUH`(-2FwwD~Rqe~JgZH9j^qk%f7TeSe))>%wBgZWvI8k$;r$AukxaUDQ=$r%K-%FteW?pa_TZq@W|z+S3Q5}xwadr9 z4KtN}aZ$MrPdunBuLrv@MFI&VLL3qC3K#0Ew1h8g%#R4fqVoz~lL3F-yE;pgzoDni z9U&TCO5H&m`Zk!&v(|gBWK19#{!L{OOfM7jSb5IBc zSc-|?VEC+Yo>o=AfA#%2IaC5QFx4xSNYGBeJ&;JnUI=L{%0?>Xodtf`eX1oaz|1;R z8gS-pX}Y>P`E7kJ&7OZFzRho&VH#5zc_HW2cJ*oc@V4a-j=yp-FMj8p(*^q8<3xAa z_Ge@DvgZTZH7dt_(@=Tq@ErVzFSnn!-Q#JTS7X)#-AJ`P>JgwsnU(7QQJ+`#yI^$i zpiVv=s@*8!@JD=$57V7!sHp_C-cQ&)zQ{Dqx@ zaoZB`IY8_<8+yrFagt+pY=FuuxfXDev3u_r^zBi*9O*8I1@{?9GrK+F<87|Tp0=7L z#%9TVuFCCsw0A-G(0X#f%8dN^#s^>yXO7$u~eKdGGynq`mjd zOcpG!F1&D%e#w8b^iT<|KK+qLRaK$BE}QHr7+HID9dS*9e*?nLo3A-{0G(4IOl9&( zU9WzGC@q@E)J)7w? zKhmEb_}z$yj{~STT<{dcll{Iko+N$t&fp_sIS&`Lr^Jgz9G7|~;qWg+*oi$GSh8M< zl>I!R`KpjJGy%F)z0Ado9OHI#R0%l_?k`*hIW_`5PK6T@SWGw6rME5=VxNH<>fGLK})RYd`%2}Z05>uUC^>*8k9Y3eCWHUOHFnuHe*##w3fW@ z)K4lQ9J*Z(3Z#mFnoe6CSgd;nTY?`W1g4D{yaPzI++4dlXL@kwV&f;XQkrtn>%v^l z?(ToJgM$$;ISXh@1U!@a*5Ogf5=gI*<=m&b5qm)JTy=KcQm&tx`ifuBpep8i-F9Gf z>Of|*^tcZJ|G(`j0{(M7FQ>eguGaBW7guZs3&lkBO&g>?$76ld13QDdLb_R@_{=O@M?eR2{$U6>+#c`zY1`P_=0(I5fusXlsGb= z$$sFC7G*|gX%7Y4|zSp0}0qi=rvZ@<`S_vNrv3@iH8jc-tyg|xvbWiIbf(B3V3w34grI+! zZlI5zQO76ghr^-W6pqZrUD5f0p7C`|xA3n5ScMx#7z;OK)X5Tq(|+GEymRH z)bfbN@s>F;cUj{mbi&s}R!S2xc$9w~h=6q#eXl2fqLm2k5U}C4-h8?u;Ui(Azt%P> zuOjO_10bRh_qC(n=$e4@f<=*)kMehub? z-VephS!+~O_AFHHu$d`Awgq5szon4v>WArJm9zv_T!W;5$(5ofLywL1m0s|x@2q?e zH)Kg_iZ_S;j`C<+iRaFIAwwu!Nj0z>NM5d83o1j69)|XeRN(T(eBJcvD3nx127rITAJ4FmKKRqf zx+ueH9`Pt{L}oV#jF#sLm&5Po3ZL|2@Lu|bJ^}?Rwbp*wy5C&MuUEjbDElw7Q4KvI z89k0}Nv#G7Lx`TFChKpQ(cN(ld$y74IRGarRYYiI#cKjNx)kjy>}XwnD7H6ESG&%J zF2asp731Ebi`mgzt5<)2WJGUKoEL`yIQ-}K2o_^*ZDPaPX!XI$mQ}DNW`U{N-&JS= za<6Urv&Fd3-i3Z_8BA~pwo+g>%7Ym9ljNgXV5-;tlG1nxa;EGwEzWf#XX{RkQ*w=1 zy4TnPm(J|(W;IJXVrhl^*S_Z)6$y{MNk1=;_r_6LBmyG`)E9qQ4j+k+H5a4<-dq%l z&}bWvhpT5f!QgtQvzkCm&>&!{^h?w!t+FJqVjErI^XbmZNCN*Idb_kZ0^Fp~OEK#b z`0>`Ur!rz?=~4_Fej+=l+9m$vBPp(-AxTQ4T47G02s9T2(WDn%HF8nXDH_#HvZi&f z4ye$45}%2*DM^1y4PJ%n5kSG_x%)xk?eIA$QF^F;crEzUj-ceNk`J3T`brfA7) z;cKUgx4-S%i%XGzegU71_Iw^USNC$V`zk$+-&eP*zY|(%efxYRKm07C65V{mPZ|@PYPo6w`k3?Eg7}$T&OX~vCkyFrg_~DQLSf%?b zPTM2Zk*}*;aqv+aI(^M_I|yalTY~zC94K1Scr=MdU()qV9j2kQ ziuDTTx_TDzG1^h`#v}P>7#6YeKYR60XIm%{EgFAzQcLMTkVC-k%>KFQnXr11Uqwi^ zjUmb7Qln;_{4TC2LJnHR<&3xHYF}+6d>cho9T2_#YBr6j&+GGvg_E9gAd}6l za_cLzbyCSe4kk1$la+TNO6414mC;1uA&dLTkrDpwmJCO?iKCM@UIsCbyc1^J+I{z^@qgHL*eW$dm_vW^9DA+;D~wLa!7c4V)& zFtf@CZFlj>{yhaZPq9QPU%A&qJ2;_v`@n?e>A!hG6CZaQ{iU(yk@(4%fP%3JmeJu{ ztVz=UP;XgBmCoh;NMHb+#r-c{eK%1V_Pu|fz_~&e%g<4`r0gU9y~OA*`(}&X{RK+$ zarMF9#Le5Mi-ZR6+67O2DrG9VDh<}uEKcEQYzz+tShJ(ZBu3dIs9kY#>Hv{^l;uw)UhS3kjz#Vr|>iEnH6dU?5;VX7i(wzp(AKWLssH z%mW^cUrXw<$WGRVDUc!rSS+|x|^y)vWce03VplulKIB*PiC&B1ML@l-GapCwb-_ zerVHfrcbsERK}N&r`n3z(>Uqm!5vJFD=MV&zDEgRKs@g4c>K5ln_q9`E5U(kwx0{@ zSIig8`*o?@82nJt04lp?$59>whyF&A)cbL~o&QKdvn6UH=mK0-=MCZKgol|uoCJ;t z0@319QcxBR1`$S7B>#w$p^JYX!#4R)s;OWbaIhx{YMLpXMZVD;hVJ57)v^hw!tUFn z3+Y1>xZ@xA`q(RxYKq^{nwl98L(;$_T+{;CnV}O1U~ksKf^+P3ZV|>(o~$V)+HG=KG!WF1Uq z>T)h{V8_Ka`ycC3INp=Oir=4h4A~O2IDpKQId^GF`ft__^2&}C z)>;A59QVzG{vcEsI(>f#lFY0Z3_~9|9yW$KssqhYp(9A|ah`#spBt{@L*wNYalBYO z9W14V+qJKi)SrJ-+r!XvLn}Zt%CR&;XgJ?vnv@NuDA}vEb&Fng4Iy=@^!oS|E!}C% zy!jVxAg5T^`?8UIeDy{8fZjU791HKNOC1?=waSjoGiy34h)7aY}2E{e=KSm4#;xsbc;s@{zrUw<6Vf76(#NLSsc=>2GE)lH)-Jk{Z8i|9Y9R`i=Mef2l3@1t}aAXx$NS$`(* zE;&S*uW^cJbL4HP`0K?^aiDQFIY}=dMkr*6F4TgRUvz&RMR`EL4YJck!Qp5OeAJCtkoJ_y4`sI4TdS{8CiBTTkYbR@cJ=C?wSv2 zfimKczXP$!^dRy)Nd*1KeH|O=E;XQ0`I=Z~pYsyrQGk4ux(3RZkb)+Xf@I&G8Fhk} zeZ*N3TT_3kl!piVX1U-aM+w?ug}$`5nxY$`@`-@aldRNngh9Iw$OMy+Vp`B`dWTeL zwiXaVIV>AS*T(*U%{tPSI3=PiV0f-pKELin;HR+%e~`;gB^m!v={Kv-s)VBB$nMQ- zr)1g+^Bd8_f5!I2APMyuK|kh?A*WBrRjz1h)k1%woJTfF@oZhzZ=ORGy+Q~cFCq!I z;ReqkrNo(p+3H=J3vf)p)7or~Gc8TF!+H0-fNl}qi!B7@-cjXNJ6%-)A(d%C4B9~h z8j()gZ4c>{xHq+SYj(Tere;yQM}dazBJF0xH5q}`3vbPSn5E-aCm+7}@N}(-Ip8l( zo{4`oAaCAwsBlw0{MC!kRv*Y`e_YQZ93hAl68csbum0a*^(zr*?k-m+AAk0%)8go5 zm#ldE_jp8R!-Tz60^+WoyfFt5bPnXd1eiD@P5VGrr_QO;Pk&Vw9_eokI+OnMi}I~B z4Zu;9ZZFQcR6ENJIH2gK@VR}(Dwac^W2Ao((1*p)tlq!2lh0oK`qbQcd1u~zZ|&J= za;q=)i(i6m?c+gGN(QcY(vb?Nfv(B`Zur~hSxpB$RRuWjdQ1J&pg)V(T~i_?E1 z5$q@PLKLfJxh8|Btxi5lH%1N5WPSWr+&R0;Nox9(7r#qWPHRq+mZ;;F)*#WwSFE2Tinej1i*i!wd9EF8v6>tWITg2$p>065y;ND1PT@HU&_q&Aa zqAz!l+(Zm!@Ql+G)J?$0M&wUZA~hZmR+9wSSf9)ULl5Jzcg#n{sTn8?5^#c+oHZOH z*HVQzolYB{iH6iX@+K@1xS2wN9NnhXw@s`5SsrOe^-7Qnl?o%JEIV*PXD}GWm6lj#wZVakCuP6fX$z&Ym;_G zo#wDTxJ1pcW&mn($P9gZ@4q3W0S`uoaEua^mWrTb%gAVMG0q_^Z$$HRaCUk$w z=i@+85?WqP^%ATUsW&?AQOebryBlL(pE8#!T{?^S{kypun=@TT-ZRn3QA%XU>p9{9 zGQ6>Yvb7${eTL4I*)b{e!Y_)hH0U$TS)plPZlwijY^6}}fR=v|Sg*`+%(gD~S)w<+ za%>{!+eS4`VOzNmB6NP{muCw24O=w!q3n1m79sB!pT=f+)Hshe=Lgmf^YIYpJTFsv zq>7wEO;%>g??s7|OlnGmAMtRxLFj>!r9|(sO^>q~STrf`874y8J2&@Ye&dNG6OrPG z4^6o{=j%?&s!f0L)v~w`+Z67NUVM);@336W?)-jgj3@8B{p2U7YXw=Lb1d}+0DQ}p zJ8ST?{-4pH=d3tnr`_hNxwsf=Q?zHW43b?|;v>SAJG{sJf#$G z!T!#ZwT`GWVng|!PH(NuEGAP(Trxk*10ax4Pa&0(k0yomcXK~g{LlPdmj(SjrdxX& z9ir3(eZ7A-tUNwnK6$&Cxr6%oFsoijS^(2B`+V%3^7-q7;gYwTr6B6nxeB7KGwV-b zhy`nSBjjGKl^8t=@_kL1PfHP5h4pA$3dPetdT3ovidZ9iC+Ps3=vXOE?Y9)8y=DL6 zJ}J{ue4>P}WB^JgLWiwwmRdOP7GUjTI&syIk*0q-*WdK8htE^}oaQQ&>PE4@O+)m?ujlRhNg686hd-ocr;=DPDT?QzIoIAE1e zS#y8z0}4voMwWoz55N;S5of8PRMcOkV4Tcm(yBl{xGyzOgr_zLya^mDVGq|Aq#lX0Ks}yXP=Uw`1}xUOg2~v)=IYg-Cg2Vy z)#_k7!1|o0h_!k}N34gS!*MTGMY`sx*|;8o0Mg;ZAh# z0VX&e68F2h-44~<>c2|uLe&KHwuYZ*-4uD+ZJm#X55*oxli_K(<{e$*?qTIY`S<~% z5aX*<@*r(AIb``mQ7z$P$AXz(e_(yiUFf_XwV7YrTG597alL;wvv9j- zpDpiO?*zHyaPj!@YIM&9I>|&2r(4KQDEFniqYfi|3*Pt1)$SExo1j(-BCjTCcev^X z@wS4e6#LAolr=gu(F~m3aA`!|cDW0kI9qIeu^^KaDN>^ z{HL&ZOa<)qwT)DQ0z;M)z}zj0Q)T1uG5z!`6V!C}l44@p-bL}J9HELQmpY`eQ)gW- zcX4F9P!IC!p@H)v0!^ewZfGR0qXQe_S&+`Za@j-eN|x&ML}BgC!K-=#r++bl5X+Ec%}&{fbu*)C7n1y)A5s`zLoaS zB*3-zo}B`fImSmSGqLSpcVDoQGoh{VIarJpSV>xGtK+adD3C}YVBRnKc0*rn|3(TM zzg5CBD3~G2q26U{ z?{@X`l-O_6nFT(Yly-mlpT_+{WU9~Div7#K9G$Ix)Z8@f0quX(>??#!_TRyQM#91B;Ke71E+Pck@K{9q0d z{GPpiTIf5bALf51Lmm7KfD;+Tg&VA!qMTiweAr$~4Eq9h5IpEa@apf5Qr0KoCZgzkDbalJ>qM5)7Jw6;%!+HAX zk84yYn|o=AzVr5zCq%O!tX5N&w*|b(^==NUIIp&`BeEQ?DlMDH-Ol|$HURgz-5B9~ z{6uqdCLHpCdD3?t|C!{T$K9snHqJP>_c2c82;8+?A_qqZ5g{$O*K=jd!=c0CF!CZ`#@Eg%a`>MXm=;JZ93(*Qzk64v}C15n8F$Kqv51~RQ9;w z<5vkOQ=~mt8kXd`zw{FMQ_{{P+iD>Dj=sQO(QOa6gL22LqVzP(r`0;pDOk`|tZxm5 zl81ll-q&KnttXKII%IjiNZ+yH5g1>1P(N>V^5W|+J~>tJTH4g_$}7~Kb6*?>(~&6o3VAU9GYq*Q;^PWiEw^E1?=3^6>n`+3(mBHf3C$KGYtQNW0saUia|YL6~2F7 zUCrl^%uGvkn@-QugP&EVmZq}{WC)5k`;5@IoOQ;`m~o$G?!WKgeKFg%hBiVbaA@CM zb^(T#zH2I3cIOd?MtKI5(w1VZJ(n(`lD>#^IQiRST1~=!P=lJ-OMb&M-6$qeSX2v+ z{74^?dhS3>_q*N}fHOywcnGmt#^isrEoB`Q`GX)26uC=`YJ(W)z$x0%W}{nJDNT~- z;IO&Z4R|1Z)l@=%ExBPzi|W;X7M{kf3{Zt+H{D9R~)48QuyMk+JGSd(O!!WV6o*he~-($H}ei8)?GT~6zY>}4jiI;Fpb^> zmTr1Mc&q-HBAv&jduHoux{`mD*j`kCn}at{cj<=pcbArzH1zWLS=*6CV{M(sIaOOP zI`Sq=5C#A5bBf>N#J-PCQHp41{|4dApY1bVW9GplI8S4(Q%3+@*2d(IedNEVrpP}k zZ18Hc9C=_2IL$j0CJ8LJco?-a!G6_+v|6YWk`}`AH$zR`VeO>xL!^JqlwB5at?KP$ ztv5w$tHK3_WD(LNJ%QM?E|v6KQ5^S2NKe|#1R4) zT;3vOU~)8JEq$=k&(VQ?<}Rgj3t9sVErFHo-=WZj`8TeWABpStJ8=E}Xkfn#?y8wW z^cszcsbq$0_gXP4o8HWDviV_QVY08nVZNiq zGvQXr8ZkuYZ|d+MU9DDPz;h~Pi3N1lx??K_7#vyj)s!LXkKKPxFe6vV8?UNy=}_IN zFAbo&S|-OQZ3)v&&2twi<~$US@{H1ca?qcrG-Pegb0X}%u_jD^F0!kmYfQFpumZht zb)dZ=xs9XU6F3kUz!uBh!N8sP_!j^$ ze3Y)3x)JHqeUg~w*TF1$q}00DU+WE)!XmSrNnRC9mj0xE=!x8s))k7YT$vC zIeZW?DYk5MtRn8N6;B@sb=`_V>lZV1`xKnuIBIjlUFOVTmCPOu^FuH1ugeHtG%pE% z=%;^b?>M2jiq^ju7wL$!R4_bUu1G%+TCph5LskQ6Zpb;7CiiWFW+PeCS+8+f#NptR zv+Dp(K(W68H|gPI@izh{Y$I^IjEygwOLa<;Mw`TP0a}P}yh3qt@<;+WEbdD_$Yibc zrjep%KmsZdeFC~1B3A3PP6l%Ot)294)om+$g@$_M6^Wlm>ant)&^*6+BpP8Tbv|Gn)_O z_d;SJbAZ)oGNTi(MDxRh+nj62n~Ek&N6+f(X~s44)HvdaN$oNoTEqH{@6rF`Dw5&V z70{c1q)%Jp*`+v)ft>M5vVCSwC_fSNy>t?OyZUX)CENb@tFQ53*7x$!{*orgAn0GL zUf4I^tiGtM&2x|MeUi>1fwb-5smI0{Jx6M~4~iK)j>xS#kKObNms3(Uyio8K@*k>y&p5rcdLeH$Plo4}+@%rt$yDe3UHMeo z1(JXiik^dIRAm*uR5+|^R;yY@OW`|H@&AFz{e%`YM!ZIwG8@$fR<}g!+iR(YE@e`8 zMYY@NMmJlFwx|oKfE6+;y((b8GoIDlE9FE`(cWq}Z>E6~w;AqSkyM}Mb7@d1ov1>8 zQkQky!BJNbnJ*>qu6mm6^bJ5z`9&AfWfe5Bmxtzp7%{pHrI>R-I6^ zcDyJS&A&SpV-&B$@w^88r(|R)e*c&2Y=Bryldu^7Mz~(_F_g2EL zqtKTK;Gmj>H?tU-rB&I;|L=CV4i4VJjpj~S z>Ggt->k22pZP6=NOdyUul`tx>Q0XQqjFsZ3Ho8l>uKcMgqd)*$kf;w{#g{sN8Zk}C zHd_>89i5|)DuC}KAq;Jeb@V0ij+d;;t)z45{%OZjAAfq6SN|*tqbqmiJoA@zmx>Aj z)k;5I8!Vyw7F6*(j#G2k#U)emf#RZ(;iL3%8|;ZJTi~KC_WsC=d%}Tt|Z>UuNES~IdS)O)(wr0R&=fc+IqJ34$HK{~}6gma^)Nf9>WEGce_1ja5 z$U=vi-uMlsoMHOR+g0U|Mo^^WKOnoAk*%SBieiW1MmnNwn)lKW_0S^w2);slx8Si8 z;oO$Mqf8g~aXkqaVO?-Iq}+bGj?x+`?YWpW#Jb+*1=Mta*t#DW-ZNx>a9~~?oONeS zpSk%>ErPTWgBj&RXSu2>s2t)JerXvWMx{yLk$HQCW76R_RV!4 zQaFUqO+#&p`wWi%-5KJ-3(ys`j)&HrEYMH|2D-EWmUGs9#A79Y3jI8tk!mE&!BS3%9ii4^P9`@Lncvn>xS>R0ivahw|lkySZ{$w80zZ zw9eB`x;Jb1>C;n4g>xLbsl$W|5a0$)LdWq)o z5G(#zo?CLvTFanvX8{2sJg2ffMIlL zv4w5LEfOWwqx3v!(Teg$wrRiS4+L#2rG(gku81MNd)JVMka=J|DbNg6xaLfiOkz4~ znMx9ksRL|(>8T`GZLb9H@Sv8p=73%%`2q8UG&R88LrF-Fxcs%GWURN;_f&2X(zIy&FRTFIBrx7Kw<>igrQYd`z^HEhH@;$8NK=mwm}kL~_6 zBt)*?K{PCn<(;8e3esfKu#Hx2qzH)0JnXHX0`qi0Z#0)sY+e}=nmwu7V7&7#i=GtW zt&|~u4FtgDqjfl{;YYR8HO70m4pauWf#f{gY<8jQHlM3Awf+~fjy?FagG46x%)(Mti)*9z@})q zMT|V6?CDbY#FxJG%(PG4ZHKaJy;wgQ{Fa>~_Kf0&9PR>1hD_O@s#O`*bKZzYkl(u_l7%~XsaOrr}DtgPP@K;uKj{~+; zL76sEeJGy2VXgD|a(-PVvEW}1n-b(*90{(pv07@>rf@R(-MGsiNc;^}90ZvadNWk( zAl)My@J#p&XIv~PQZRdVV~m(XXRlCy>kRg1G-YqD^$RNUJR5Td+CiSiK4@&#Ynos% zZNeqiJm{~H)W^AuDiu{?%n24dZ*l39S^&(85K;<;>F}((5V@%`7q{)yLB*H05oZR3 zQC4;(SzOP;E4`o)QCWo^vsqRF)+gR1rbP}wg_Ra*dC6_rLhgbi7x<_3r zdU^EdcpFdjrUzR1IIu@?P3fE0(;wa_Ca^IUI6Z*NBUA3C1*aq3kDFBkdi;6HK(c`w8YgD##20xXL8S#uoaNVaz8MIcLGQQem}0}P(?I5dVRx|p!%QN`#M z&p1bF6TYzVI?2%^KJ2p)Yp2X(Cutupndaipl0}deCUQX|=BYMFpalF&`2j-s5z*&Y zT2!XHno9K5SG74ef4I4S7u@Q%6$mitUDhd1KK;ol0P>*IX#W{!zCJ|_6zQuGZPhM! z%eFW&+!!D(klg(__Fjbk(Rr2POw%>p7IP_*{@GmmPsKZZ>G|bUDLOXZH{ABP5t}T$8{Bdiky4grkj3lXEf@* z>iaR3;q4SW9Yj4c7oBR3J%*>f=jNC-KljW?3)HBk(@?)?RixkRUBTU?|DEi9lQJH_ z8euA!zETc1x#>W>h?{|j18vz!;i~rxZCaSMR9-;Przzl`AB{K@aczsn6hM4brq+pq zLMxd>Rv`(Y8(MCEVSH70u)MVl^0UuA`~Uv${~8m?IFnwWAD;fyVeiIE$>eD3SX@`P zXt?Ultc|+1diU+sRXq=xp0cH1!z_QLJ@#?m8AfQv{d`_v9iEpf!sG^IiN~n6)-FZR zkIuSRz!;}v3KC!iNg#GwaK7rKVADi72^Pl0GExVYrmI$eL&}1ZsUG;N%1heI3e)?k zXOwi&=b@N&I4->tK&?*MLo^fdl#r3a7gRQYzzrXg^P~Nb5{t52v&EELo@=!`Z_=~> zUnr1M@`8ygvXzu|D=TGyLt`%h0(MAU?aNx_)~wDwm$XG1H-GN`-CZ8T`qSUopI7fQ-i*@)hu^9DK>Uc&x+ zm)>b8UblspZc2QSzS?Hs$%Qx2fE(fioXdz{t^!zD;r5c}skfb;oNG^=C1_Y@-5W1@ z0*k=mW9NK7;(@IWrRU2_1a6Q=(&DQSq%VAGzf4|#RA?ZNd*uASk-?j#=zn#zeW2B4 zd6Z}~{Xv}x^^@6PkvC3HCq9~rmTO2&+BT%{sl&Bzub72@R6`_EqHi@S_5@}RZga_d*3NcZ31my6 zWi$3TS{qwxvkzx*D&geR&aG6f6}`iJ?#p+IOot8_$LDqqGHJA~uzickA zTIoW5SqV)waYe&e)?D^W`YOG%6cF=e4X)37DTt*cEgdIq8zi8VBhUP<*;$+7 z^`bC2$UZ+bgjG!Q5@uVnY)ULxAdiR6D{6eXN=Uax1WP^n#r2NS%G?3OKMAW7K&4oJ z9aFuTTuSRlVPX?C(07$gdL55vqoRXQ*dtEJ{{U?1N7WSy0Hop)pU~G3xapgLElcsD zQt;Jf(Ejp2BN{bup@veDAVMq4rTUkDLAF}>E7q&Uuqv&bZ~Ddr+zTV%1@y`d{}@Vv zpp4oNC<<<|a>r(uDz~b$(NRD&u6^`>EdPB|wQAy4PZ7@H*nS60<-+6;PDM?7=%@M)T{`#bk9&8LJOvUC{TEy z%bIyIpS3<)zTAVGqG58Iz6yFAjywIJFbmrr=dWyUMx7>ObXuR~4QH(%mHW6250e`8!}}UqdSb$?bOByQ}RYB+FO%eb@%w8-=RTdjRT?2^=5*YEfWF(i0q@s z$Xo8@tk}|V@Ntlu75<^}2#RxmE%W^L^P{7KS~am3uk>Ea=EgkZ%_0fBEC6f?uF$70TnP5 zv}mx9POeq~Ip<56B~8M>sS5cf*$Pt-L1|Hdr_b2Uos)xVX*>%RK0d;KVn>*Af~?*u zBKU~&2wR08xgq_0IR=Jcm!rOxXs*x@qu-LS#2Uyz2-H)Z%#mPS^tar%+;yhG_Hfy? z^**2Hbi#yQH^OeHCwK9=Q}z5m^a5Y~F;TLBaxsw$q zr45RkZk&807y7^pi`yuFt?{m`DP}D~xs|FD#YqwITsr|HnQ%ipPo!OFLthmENb?9E z-e%+JL*30#=ssWp_BympyWd9Nw`DZLl$3{DH-mw8>HR{oyL`kq6~h4{_Eu-c0PeXf z!Fts-`NwiJ(s?xyj&%~}tNB)Gd^>`(gDloXdYGPre;^Fi z&?@)@!b;cu_1uyz@QY5T19a#RWmtUeFVZ_*c75k43ey2z%nI%p6s%2h*vAA+lPCoD zTsuabrDyd=b-I=K!&R1>Cjlsg$3TQW-=z{m^1&>DqMFM?LZFse%&iGqEpr&{w&;Ww zWj^5ZrdQcF?*2}H8#(zVo5^IUB>hY$i~-_3v1!Pi#&I(?hE@o}K&&`RJv0ZsT?L!3 zxocV|(^~Br3yEB9j6@U2M%P`Mi2Q+8XA#>bqzO*PEKnD)Kw0QWNYklgJ5=Dt zX+h7E&TMC0JKEUbnX9&Vi-zm2c{!;u%BEL3)3iv+eg4pY*bu1PYq1-?ClsftM_|?$ zeJ32Y^0+iw01s4K@rN1Z!}dX!z0T*ZPUfON{ZwUPx4U~(kDonD#}u}Wb*JKHYto&7 zk(!vHLqdHHi>A7>83vB;Z=_QWd^ppE} zR>+AuT8CMGPY&p{fzFYRm!FO$iy-6;1f?3^R8(Frz!=4 zD`^lvb`K`20Yns%JmVXY)V`SozzwYl(arK{K_0ZFRT|7Z5aNeUqE(=99M_~H{(Za; z20M30vLFLUCzhUQJ#)kbic-*qN!|U--@N31MYEwGFn?}lkS;U0GzckHEl1SXqF^rm zerbo1=)YzkR;sU=OJ7$0^g}3RT^Jc%6oWoTI3_KjYp$9$hS+72s&%4;ll;;jOdbEBOCV@} zyZn_gXAn$zy_7usv0Z~4?9fJ&4V{2f0-m*iHCc+1$T&~i1~_;2AR|y?!KLSEmzjaq zSqb3o=h4xv^G<%5(T!%nOpbHYI=iN$||qQl+5Z+{+=1gCF}` zuu36t;xS7PbIf&2>p9o(qx*T;voP_0t)M|bBHqG9yrKz!8QEs>=g#{Efz2KS=j7Id zvc2qY-z~kV6M6QqE(@75qqRexTaxv(#7Rh?fE7}C7v@|W#Z&8o@pdN(9+ugEuRETD zx0LbgxOu&6zY<7|Y|D#&PG5S9GOQpe9Dx4GJqeQRk}9e_K+aq{49<#~*$XBl z$mJ$1f5aIW^I`7fA>GycTvCI*z$91Mox8KZe8y2}SK z7qm3rkt$(6B!fIPCEZqn+qtYO=zAXWGL%NQi1@y%1s5&1sHVvZ-H_Fn*%3Lp&m7^%QbWp9zFgMyJ<3K?A6+^6knyax~s8 zD-c@ls7u723P|vOwi-iId|i|f`w$l^mN;!JNI}s$$1$O!wUC#YTJ-Q)RB+oJ%}$)_ z4FzWyrJ1(O$jDNbab@*5hKff@$U;AY!SSeWW{^=2P~Cg9Uu6GDbtxe6EJ7O-dc!+L z0AxBQ0dl4!?lrg;dEg=M300op^cnO2EJ$KCb%3N}A0O<07CgLS_JaSw`5}9pfXnDm z&)2uG&8|gB_v?NZI3l#aMm^)Uk@Kzex%1{?9yo^_HCT2(sHyArkf?{Irm~L_j>CSj zOl3^~$ri^#7&B+lQl!V)TFXIwsDXFg3xTSLo_#%D3j@zSaTMNQpC$vVEDB}iZsu%S zxFL7&7muiaZ`r={m9G^1bLZjdu?Bb&+7$dL(dc3xH;^8s>PO<)eIq?M9GjHnwwzF6 z-h&o3(xACQZ@@Hz(@)yIyOb#r<3#=Py6p`y*0I~n!O4QPm3N92(O{Km4Y!URX(+!> z)clfyi7KXux=ZqG(J#h_dUTdkd~0L$FgAW`1&?2UO0z&OzP}VUCx8dehCuJhNy8Fl|cx@8!N1sU~7=* zG%lEbG1fViJwop1Zx}t<^Se4Y-OB`xO1xHWSlRTmbazdGvPzx2s zAeJeeO;#2>Z>;_YZ9YknEBzi3mBE!oe3a3D;Lm4r&=DAA2KMIA^s&$2YMa5*v7QO?CoAP5V0RS~| zBe?}(n&@Vpe-K7Y4~(M#D|qDM5nb_e@weML)8OvoGH8Y`~d1eVXn03@o7`~O6S8oX|=gyL8{!418T|!BNF`$#QrjJ?8xzhT&P!c04qDqDe$3vaC$z;smw zYd#_4WE7Bup&Vp(p0z7|qAQgZ3g+r%+n*aZK0uuU#-mkCS z>doD>jJH;)rdyiA`Fw{o$)&)C#41;jaSvA6K>H`4HYi^2xw1ZgoXQ1CJKO8K-Z`1d zJt6$3TO^qRglm{blu8=LdwFPA2N7RQ*(*h9576|}h5lr<1@AuvXsk8Bk7^mL*y!qq zKmOxDQ(2jI3_twwza64eD3Hlb?Y1(CvdticSw2`CBIq|20FVjV>{;498Zv18tiB6G zdg#{)vb&kpUUpD_ovSAR)3kEiEOc9nJmm>ip=HNDe!Ak@x-*f1O72o%Q~>Pd=JeZO z0&r1WE)Q^;aUD9wT{dAS`$d-i@<6{Eh_M)~r8BisyC#!-@=2Nq<9bmb_aR+J(b1K^ z4l!r(MQd8?Ndih?qQ1SM7jA7TXZe@4B_Z2-u@Yui?0wjOlEXus4r7dc9hT+t=`WNT z(i_O>J?y*WWKzdp{^@ykZJKy{Y#E5_C|M(0$P2S@Tjv{x#I;u=0c}H&xSHZ`qb92u zQ;k`x{lb*41YJ$IIUc0eMv7}Ox!%#XU*U=}-Con3nd31r%e}s8>M_Hw^mmfApf?po zRAk*5=CI{|dJhqDt=AWA%s&z2;oMH^Fm`$!`Y@F2WewBb@$KL-l1m?RDcUXovVLQ= zZ~PpsyJ({+Z&vAe$BsH%$Kd751Gyq0O6EC2^Myn7=%kjz382`aq6)UEK#47Sh_Eyb z$+4j=MC46|oR745G`JMHA9>p>)^ZSs3L!a66AGw*ujT*ER9I303p;6Xyo42^>4YdJ zkhk;?Hzb74L;3++A2;6dyJ@lrjPVl`u_5XfYM@A@kxOGB(Fx{?p?iA6QGMZr7&l5G zqczUw^KdTUJ4~&|vzZ)7oPUrf>?bqkM(0z;d0jfSXKux@*;+!Ozt&)aGkD_Hef7O6 z6QtLF>8oI?jzTh zjk@1r-$9=iDsn-{Lbe3#Y6Bebsw-KhwAiwhFTjOtv|;s+MFZSoD4MO?dee0EqCp-yw6krO1ENRL>8pqIc>7{#u-CYM zvpZmIyC9UC+mP`0t*6MVT4&6A+pq|;!^Z^IrMoh6<{>X*Eh=~8oa=hpKg{{c_$Bq` z8DLllEm@-HArB2DPuihgG_)ne>&TN#3snmYBeVjWG%JbXkS+_@K%4a3Ql5Th?jY-! z;N_jHGkeXs(Ai>!#=0GL+#l8YVT6T$Ge=u>7UU`{6OcT-p)8qKbtxRs_>@ih>Vx>l zfT7nAL@Qsr$V6~P-DD;2Xdt$AP!#beIv?3fjjUL{yu2C^r7Kc+k2a(GTf z5OplcPaf2qw#Yv$th-QaXj0_PL}?qnr%36kXjpLD+<~kImGrZF?D76Hk{J7c@qmsS zUp_d1ovKa+Z>{{BP+bkimXzEn>w3_!I{({kO^BezNsUjoH5Jb39}dV>?Hy!-8N}+$ zLbvrx(Z)hMWi}Jd?=DMmTO~$ma~Nxnzfc`ye79_HylE-Eoc#wLFc7^);JOV~Y){^Q z?`<5`@BU<+3FxcRr)uV;mM$1)%l0urCQCN zbshricxhj>Orj6&4+jhj_RI>H+t?~EvqLv9*rdy3Tlr(qu`evnIYT-Up6qZ{7OPhS_kqK zl+8UDQKcHT8O2?Q;Qa8%e`Io0jQ3?P#-Jo^++)n?K8FMPSQocK_P|X8AjTU`OP)M? z|H)}g`a>~v^5p&ZMc)5VnvY+Kp0Q>7eEGA}ePJlkC*NkNFZWr0Ek+`11ZIt_91jRr z81^=MT;5CrbneYIT{KkS5ZYsJ4nJ`);zPFmUq7vMO4Ok;HlW9IH?9x9ca71qvPbwczZ(7tg64^AY4cxvwzkY#~pK#%v%32Uk zQLhN}liVJ59QWxu;;c|oB%o8WU?6LlMQj5@d&kq<=FW5NCD#6c45i0I{pBNemQo?)vD5EX$rnCoz^dZi#SKB@ulTCDJ~wpDhPuG*SGx=(QD_2 ztmt1v$P@W|OMJMdCl>|!=s6!QS~CXeyc`-%4vEerQzC`YaX%q)5yAdii2x>wbeQUf z$hxL@(HGUr)o*Lz2oR_Tnj=&g0AIiDDr?Lxr@0EYKg+x&jseQ%!}RJ;0zzGT2b&Oo zi9VeyGJBUD7g53CMe>CJl5SN)1X4A{H&VR{`b}P3)C!s`8tDNtldd8!9_!yL@>0yc zhvrg7Ql5E-28S&AluTmaD`=W5;PhkYjc#g}!(Xt+bnX&6qcONH>YJtCiaNPdb3;1Y z%yVl@#iXzOrM|*sHT@-)>c$tTs!x1>A3532qyF5M zZ*D4Jn^+&HTkESef)3K_FHWse0*v1DO^0@+fJD#|&*OIr!TRR45zd`FgtO*{F%pTZ+qos~M z3HnFRgPo1p99J0$w`y3ooKJLpt_;vBG-NR0wT92%d$Mp33S7U;);W@Y6<}owQjvQO z%lu~3M$H@_CA$bV45TGx6nTBng2e7~o3qyRx3VlNTd|78P9f&pbRso3X+?9KKWLrj zy^f>W+`7$*Y)z+1(m3lLcJ8ktZzeQI4HfNVtGJDY&xJvG8R5b)kEc*Fp!R#>udRWM z(HDy*Bo3VB@)PWk>keyw=`9SXLxO1FNX)OG%P#D6KxWVixsi*tH%C z>@R17NL<&$M2q`{|9YLdu$T-Lxzs_dCbxU7ev1;gIRH~Dv1*uqVxSj$^jb@Bp#VN7}SDLaQ zFdh`fge-Q*vCJ(Xvwxc?A9ORXh1d;ECGod;YlTX!>nSz?j_Lx8Qo7>A2A6lnhF&l|n@6UU2LJ=nhIP~~lz&Ct`6FJ#J5u`UBKByN0 z>iMzBl_0IB$(ph-G_R4`Ft=24=T$8wj|d#%3w9=(;T~Gds}tY&3Yk9ULgt~HrQ43f z_&yi&QI*brgZB6Tbe0Sll5yaQjjzW_8vQeB@#Yl=n%06HHvm;$W@o9`WmZ8Ao z>O{bQWi1}L{9W|BP5CQ?1Ig_^)mF2-nBU#i(A8F`X(xNeT5xH7>b@qwgPJk)nz$^s zkpGt3=CH>xE*fb9$$YUqJ&eS$sc%@Pi5%u+Cz8~N-`!Z&vXFx+^wz>waeb#4agfLi zdc;_zQE)D{5t6AeMDKE~bH;T@IszkH%5zA6CY5&66(kI2B6XRqPZlqfvZE|^a~+EzZwOVR8Ogh?&QNF#z%Ijo(3 z^*e|G)E24)5m-#vK8nruD2weE?99HXQQF_GKHNaEg!4nc8bQ%pIyCg0eUD0}y>3hjI zw!(9Ymc<-8A95_#+(8mM^%hXWR>ko8u*_>BtXDM6S=`+tRs{!FoPtufg6p<4I z=u`?`gS|V5?^{cUVeN9strP|cyNRFHy_n#veqK$$Eu+nwH;(=(Z^%cVetq_vQ#ml? z&QDqzGR;n3zOa*k1m$IsfNMYgNxZA)v}B!@HZ+_{qDX z_4{V}gL)I{uR0rnsZ+eEriyl#v@TGG3!O#omQZL`Bw3>&Q4iN5*g@;(&Ad#;!K@v+&jSf z9+}X;!0y>eB+*HKL86x`-Q}RGlw+!ijEM*36ZQ8prG$>jxn%X${~^77lV6wWegeyd z%(f-WH65eOFsb0(sQ#Xz7}B4p{9Zal_-CfoD*4L|RAvRJJ_F}2a_92%iTx8IN4Wv) zc31%$zqEY3Y#ZH|-n&_g?O`L@0L@P70$YMLyBsMN-Viu{cU`3oF_wUuxT=^t)SW1A zQr^No$I8lBvmZvUIFof*aH!JL{Ec@wNeWMaEZY1z!x+dj zbjRf}n^&-Wo_N8SMU*d|;`0^m9*otytiPrpQVunLIERydY^r63+Q9%RhI0`n{} z%%;>_fN?XiwolNJZ6Kv&>(^>SQI3zeyM9@9U3Hc6v-HQ4qMV_&exu#}F_U-oa7;1i zyt2bl2ST^o2n$1q}8yR?_*Q6K?tG=LEf?oXed>XZ?*PzBPrqQ}w|c%;3` z566jri4p?3e1VePMou<9(WVZDMKyZ9K6t8MLcA`BZ9H@}`0HU!WqnF=6`lz}bEe8Q zR#*L@p`u=w>W(g|)ul@q!Xzj*(y7LyRrET?Jj*D`(Y%6Wp|;7EHw{VlH4X4f9ntRt z=m>I<9I$gX$Nr4ix(;cZ-5EKGgrSbgFTm%2@@QQfN+Nxii;ICk!?rR@^=g1qu^}mB z-@Bb-OBzY-9TQGeL}|9#=ug03Lod#HF0$&%btp5z`jQ^6mf#g4lZT*!Do-G35U`DI z0~4&lCaU(Au`OY*Fqmt-pb*t0 zmVb9Sm;nSN_%tc42YM7q=$AB(kpOAyiS&cdx_KHJ?jq&CkI;^n2zkm$|02gO%x&1{ z*r^3PHb&@<%ggL|lp}3KGyI_eoXhNG(ZqmqqcqwGc0uv6XT&41Q6jmbyMq@k%`hK)j86~43h>TYePRItGTBTbq8m~DdGI%9^ay*UkUZ?Td`P8J7@+K z)E&H=)k!scd-dwO;3asvAdwfA$TrIWsx)6B8q2%a7LB(GTdaD^~VGyL00ggf#gHGyjJrao{Fo zKw`Cean+}+&N0-%d~vj7U<^xGf(deo!@f(%0VOa~D~?Yrty^V}Rg-$EXNSl_Bv;BO z?DLCx@+NE$=s>=sSoC)pvXvuL271Nn(}SaSx=kimD>PA&r=GwnN-1`PnO;W zT&NTmF9o7J*nK%~G2%);mo{`in{j7)&>Kk2OSvTOiNNBCC>0}jS*D^|l3t_sj|EdZRr|fTbW941(lxG!BNHQ%1h4hQa>q zh8y#RA&7u(E1oM`BKCz9zdNT4CtJ^wGNxE>noz)_({@IGgioqQX>M0_dhXsa+Vnzm z)Q!TagJ22!!5}HzGQ?|Lh$gV9xI+VYpq|3dt4_(&(%>TAZ(e;>H=C>Ryt?YR?MxW` z8$`F931mc|e@OaaL zOv`_r|8DHva%OXgvBig$qQpi=C)uj8F$3Ee_H!wJ5X9pO9EciNMYy(LFegB+euc_t zB(YRhwTgl4K+>^^TNK>zzI^1~<_1E@a&#MS8nP;@uJ3MlYDDqKiB3p}i}EL?=mKF% zU-ouYh0;=VTANJXSi4e!sF_?MWlcBYe+~H;=qL~A{}AX!?Iazz>5~T?lIlm;U^r*L zNWkcS@BvoPA{nmbh6>yT@*b0=tk`hF&|ET`wg}0j87;d3vFwO5@V~tJ?^kX5BHz}{ zeejWT*0IwLE|<-+>=<-6jbO1TLoU;1sKGxL1rnIOTCX2DTIbW$+(NKP#z|`#Ct+J( zkIiM(nLp%Jzw5{Pd-hxlGX{X}=60R2`gKsXG`xydJhNbFS6YiHmKd^ZU!*sG zJ@1hQ*XM21eOsmD*}J>Q@6_&wyjbe+zRWt_ozM%OgQ9?!A!V1*BS~oKv-HR|!CV{K z8~;}QP3Cj!k=l$KX(oT${p&x>+fk8eW1aR!Ip4_Bq6b`ZDv=IRib;Fc;7d@^1R3SN zm&u}X@9dbS(=6@Lh~hO!P=Nx_qrG*1B%!j8H$yF+m!ZGLLfB{fa|_pXxhhVI3ecd> zakI9wTGorK~9`FRtd{mVFt_jU2eAScOC!wkhp6o z{@S-D7?P@&Z8Zf>RndMdYhg+f(IA6;aAGX7>xHSHJYE_`EsK=zA&Kmxr= z_pWA)*EMLe3Kw~-o!HPXvY8eO1(dBu zbCxmpbc3uv)QhBis4fX~4{N4fx&~=B7@Jax3q#=2UWFc1OK%>0DFN?6v*ZUD^;D1n zdh8_c^X1|U`kTUcSHYj9%U|Gs14Vy|Uy~oC&uyIDv^~yH69eTCEV>^D@pYTIu`pG6Di(kMI_t?!N`R}M zu~t1Ii~O`7=WR8NQ(BDOZ38jb{wDp$|1QE^^?fr-RcWPq$oHba(nPI)RoC#XuA8l+ zQi!!IAU;;T>3&eUc%g5h3BC!b4GaGgU%5iCIrGKmO@ zmOW#`ehe2;o}e&DdF&1O>W|F0RFGt|FAs(z0i+!ER-#-##$P&58w+|;wmBT5q}6)= zc!~0$6X7;q^+lKt9$OPu6A1;Lue56&zp!f8oLbv|I*5h2l3IwnIiLnP zH~e=zwI|Rwfjqd}nHd7}G<7HDA@JZt@zV6qcK{OKp!h4^kYmR6kELB?+h7+yUqqM` zTdp`4#W9LC{_4-|at66xl{J#@dNo>Bg#^NK+JMc1T6U@vCh2e)aM#@V(%aKk!W-3;fmn60s*tXKqyR)fyT5S}v?wW+9Ugn+ zxkR0^_qGuV*m#MB%sTfZiF^J8Dw0I41ooAy~>oO#k~n=f_ewbQAf6 zdQX_?h`(_r4%t^3N!i}x& z@bQQ~H*743_0;Ub!I**3pEsvcG5O10Iz)~f@VAzCG)$Fnf20))r^@+{9k)J|%ht#d zFag;oOi7q^s)*9=yj(#m7V08hW(dqt^jeQN^A%)=OuLc66VM@U4(Xe%l&Oj6jFCqh z#D1o#Qryr8#;7r0QGoI?vQv6S&AIu9wLVeao38~aK>zebIM=E^;N76Z8B*53^o{Mb z;_VG(oI{f|e-Fh;4dMq(J>`5>#x2>`PAx7nSu!Y6ep7~<0J!<0AFt~4g?`_3$K!44 z)e9}0!ot5#pn2!*x1W*;>4||KhX<-DRzKTjliRhO8z1lpRL`N&#-3(^90c5)lqi+0 zi3X5r!p!dCv3H{N6Q#mPxng6ZChmuMvqB08Q*sx3z({ zpos8fn!Mrf0v1YDo$TuXYAz84@->lk@L5X(SC!H_bv=F*L7sBJDQt2-3H*_qB|jpn*3XE@K-oA&ZNvYm@_ zydJPBJz!NJ^^HM9<(>>^Qk}Ju6nAQ(t<$>32vyf2jV8#6ul)$2tp(;7>wNd2z02hX6^6 zuDGI2ElvcobXZxHh=oy?1RIkiB?XIMI*MbFc1<24fHFq!8U6`hUGRz)N@LbHG5w+o zvsg79VDv{-4u0}^yd$&8a2y1(Yr9K!%KXrltHY#t3z07(KhylFbxSMXT$0c91TV#y zf5>Nr2T?vbG1@026k*I_?oC?qoub#$!-&2as9a){1VuA1q`fd#NSWrA0zO%q8Chr_ zxP!PEf;mco4=-e&Vw66Ft^q}6kqNLxDi*9|2^!C84X8esL3O;lX=s+ zQ0$UQd3bbJZF@I43xhixQ0J74k}z&+e?50id7=HXLtD`dcWp$>7pl6`a(Y+Cp`F46 z5IDvR=aP_Lof|TV=Ri1}u z7YGkdF>+w87rQ^pHbg!zbQ5Y~$5i-%;MAdid5b{@ijaMPJ;f7rmbbcxLt6nJ%pnh_ zlhpz)oO^tx3WS2AUxZ_6)m4$H#^Llvi78B)l%D}5u(bsw=bE*J3yJ)-_C)fiy`ZTT zu@12QYR3($gJAr(3@nB)s|YFHvR7WF!;Tx`SNOG%xr)ulyhEFM z7wJ17Ve(Ox^cm6GN1`b3eQxAY4~$YeWG|26G|OcDY@o5Qj8)lOq3-znQ`>KurW05_ z{dv0eQj7wKh%-!obHs8?$2Tq`y_W+{>fue+-OnBxN~e_Hz!RRk>dc6~e`<_lg?79KPhu&ChFx^tK#DD}SyM>9M8iL_ zjxk%i&07%V)*ZCrBc8V0u{V0QVl=)%Q_LGl(pe(<;Q%uz0`kbb1)K)U*atT5q?iaV8Py7cF%_)}h)+?K z$uxFk`{pckklxM#mNo_%+BA}L3Dtu3bVZ^yd7mYe<@f~vc6L~)SqR31%gTnBv(y6@E=nk*WNeHF2*4wtr6Kgu7#s4~HLOOcheAKQ?=?&p5AN zoAdE0F|fiP_(c9d_<{wgpE7Xp{dYo+M2Ca~qfoaNe-L7EdMb(rd?)+mqemI0_X^}! zjeMKQSx(P+{3*Hy6)VqC$zMnTw5{s85)pZcX*CA^1}q~PRxzT9BefprC#Sb(_i*2v zlCt%^0xsT6$~^n*`~Ug-Yaf0UY0@c=l;=9ukfAyzTl|bOEQ~ zv##s*f3km-?@=F+q!N9wJ7Ym-7N2z9@7^l9_tQtKb;GfzG)0^nabzf#4HGBnWY{K} zU#CO4y9n##5AE=3!KjTsdKuE0?9(>nYvGDc!e7QY_Wu z*+qsFG+2 z$ms)RgxwY!J+{J#F19anHseX7z}nsRDY8?q9yNJfm|{6k`|J-zS7)cIi~9QiI}ed; zPLlGaAhrnNef^Ki1vB0}d-u_!4~}x-ElPSP_Epp|R~l~#CcfK=4Ue#u$()7f&6+^a ze^NobQv0-udMF{l4i-;Iq_!J8j=*$C>BJ|s1|9`d6(WLDD*7amwj}n$R-7?PpcL5y zUILG1_FfPHKzGMnewcku=TvdCbX_K1->5@5LV{MRkAgiMVgK-vfjCj1)KPn(S-13f zrA@-GBNMX*s>)uqn%8>dG2rPHf66vbO2=tK@kr^K{gauHQfW!1EE1scv~POC0-MyoZe{Wd%i-aT%1c_|Z89Si`Ez+NRKChCjPqGBsrQ%UzZ~*Gr zj~yE)!v>T;kC53f5b(Nid%rbkkr4n0gK-@3mUl`%>1FVwM_$?|&a=HyR-VbxV}VPE zM(egRq$-ckBCrLu3aPLo=Jg3xA$A24tQO2l&f3w43cZQ`_KEeef4JHW;iwRd2D5z+ zkhqh1KdTHW;!!0C$a1iz>oMGjLdD3Iq1dvu0S{0T^6|c;xN~S`Q5tl^w#?+A@2J_O zi(pK}C5Y=AuZ44`raoXZ7Homhvsl<`Hdx{!yl46hBa7dnp~u_SJI=E&t8F`6TxF-t zRrrAOOGU2dirYzg8?7&%)Kn zsAI)o5J4;)K3N1MoySxscK`HPk?9N6b)cQi7`t*GVFJ8T@0w|Zd2Dulr230S7zkN(QY26Yk4f0t@^)M0h$dY^Ik{1#bozl_3a z;^2)Vs4ELe5wL|!86-S=T5JH$%gBwpi@Lw4hQ(d2C&SB}n8fI5E2oOH?Qk3d&Zz^+ z)J4r=r&kZe$wI2u)mfA}GHxph8nCh(3)0mP%vqdpS+)Sfoh zF5D_n#gZ^~{ax7nG#8%0gUf8sPirF876Tlif>qdDj2uk)TSUYt;RD#2Kc8rWlcNC` z9Uwt;_Z$;>WzBehH~>mN4@0^I7ZI6WkvB;tvnaAf30=pu=1}bxgfpeh<4!kSex3(l zf0wF`l2rN}caS5?gr15D0Rr`TGW71sbvvHb7-L7ttV|>$LP_2IbWhP`QC%?vUqplI z?72g&<}b(s{2e?3cLotK??dGB>FXn+894?vxKrzP#Bhzp%$)bA5W0S>soQmctvJe{De_Vo# z$?w-BWXeGh;vO_=XnKF}aJIxY>2vLOqs6YoC}+R>&OhCL_kCml&Jo>t!>52zl1O;( z&0qfQ-AC{I@+drMe=4o6&ceoUbi1LYQaT!OBskQD1}(e@>+kq*m)=)wne8!Y-(>j+TwdvUQyBz(&=Mehlaxr3C~ur zAr4)b?Cd^!@Z=(FvpoBvf4wTkZF&61rXp91uu^;acYnl73UmudbKAICvidIUIat(k zLrxTWw{(aSmb{F%K%@YvfaPcKsR}!o(UGi@(6pDL?GcV<>9YdeCZ8jXVcCPv+Ae%O zWPb`Dp9V@#>Vg_+rx)Ql(w_Q#d(mW<;o*H&Qq9;LQBPzLL`{@ae>e`!y})1V&@we?i(}E^6U9 zZh}wF2|LN9)uT#9rnqUaLF-2)v4_c;Vr9E+D{i|oaaB}`xL2pzz^qpUv&`4zpI(Wa zp<4eqD=0#;*M#v%EXzdpx`^n^xJpYi$z|z*-rQRicwQ+}e?}FqdS)vXzJroyj4lol zi;I#yr2;C8<4v^Ffo~&p1NK<2$@ypil9E3)8qd9h(KGa2ewrvX#XCjUz*>A3Fxm4r z+*ApL0{GV()8T+%6hp{&YVuhbF1CW}dp6wc(2PcxwBdM41EI;-36q#nMCmbYzuJo9 z)|9EBa4;;Pe|b3eW?-$7H-uMHAvfpfCdbn>M9R9CLB#!AXD~fr2cgt8Ck2vP^X#1X z6rxYdG55TV;(%I|8l^?aqdW=63f{}eS?}i4B1JA+xiu`?!2ACbYdO+2@?pOmUTJ)IUMHN6mUjtlu$w+24<5N@J9ZNLc8ii>68D@`1LCvNk7zb4>^ibbdm<$EV?};S8*I z*sM{RNnN1@Jn2>1lc8qJN^Vk~nnag3(b6e5MkZ(Jo>ZJm71`LnA%7BNn~^Thu=7a@ z+?8T^-_LLOhM-iD@JG0%!cDy$^ZiD}g(U2Bf92QInzb4_d>%QgT|dOIi= zhsSA_M~m)?1ID)Mqlqmr)Pz5l6Qm)vpiYQLI?Pb@0J1;#n+Gs#ge@D%P%-*P1T!g#WC2my+lM9+VT%?~-OEgX| zS}VSL(c&vGb}P1#GfT#MD^}8tlghMFpW8yRZ}^H3OF7mYB;$jMe~*Qj zcxZ{re%UI#mz(><;UlKakwtgdYMXU26q~yJCWMPkRSyu+EY_@!yuqza#{8<$eAcU2 z{xr1w3*P0&N$bE&N*3K*|P7XMcW74$E3r9zjZhBrmDam~nL#3AZJExsZf6LaXIAk|s zlSkA6X^MbYP;JY&`@J8CKkxo?$K8i_#rqH6fB4RiRayQo-sXsQUGQ7})!Xde*vr>G zeD0gs2zKV2*x%hIe4#nsWPHLc4)MFDEfFO;EiFq2o$)o>aj*e&)ZF&tGUx($y;fKs zbS+OzloUoe^>}75Am2@hfA()Y@9cL-0uJuS|b)N8afpq=k8!A(z`F@$Nk5F{l|P|$H`8}irig)=NkZL*>5{ApSvT1Q0R=fm*K zCIRTEmuT=(7&*35hu}8@)a*duLY5CrX*^Y%-X0=S&n^^sM=d(_f6z%kUa9$=yM%N==6ohv+P7@znJ={Ra@ue%a}VcGo^urtQ@QO4vCb7r&6&xyQYYD zNkP0>CnVBzwA7NRS3EK|go~(bx+ln(LkgLb5e3V6K!r5?YC3+8ooyjP5 zIiQE5F+oWk=sn-Pq&9q@XVa0e4_vsh*){U?glNi|L%RV~e*@++vK;J4$k?Hh!3IV? zAxbfox1SV4;w2Mq<{>;M{KKjt8CdwVKDrQMsH8pg$PVExiGxN9F)ny>Rm5bz8pe>{ zt|Qbl+N#|1)_tO=2%;!B&@kCy6W9h1?4F{tnHCN0jeBu<=XxU<`eS0n_4TXRRv?0yg?cBb@3heVvTh%GdNxMOG*9dbhj9CkB zF?@v6HsOnw{lIb~)CXr>o7cX-Z9u`^_*v<`fB4eIV`!c2E*QAxpNFJmMSW7gi+e{9u5Yh0Lxqr7K4O$J&g|u3}J0JbpE#i zVM_T%f2_IgaG(7#N(j+fHuun&jakXmn^vSV&WatbQICR*70RL!6`==h{X?!}2=#_n zbr5|X=~;Yv5n^SZy?mJcZalvr#OI84@mV>1({``Ie%xd)+iz|uK@N$5_l_uA`M4XK zHUwUvZRcFU*T9%yC&cHfAGV1k67+81Zj*Xm=w~8pUV{SEPVNX zVvB7mk2nTsP4fkfeQ|E#ulIOa3I|Xs+3Mh~E7cBK6buC|by3lQNd-%UOYx>~8nT8^ z2Gc^NH2E0nBQ#HoB7!oPJjjWHAghoz77&5b5|mZt=>N96>wl2R@DSDR;ubxtSjkeC zf2r-zwAY~$oC036k{lTrZRYz@&J!1PJ|dsa_;&Ml>LC6@Q+ zyqkPOPt}$1TA(@0m#ls{Z%peQAFHn8e+#B)fy2<+WO$jXKGv**CoQ$AW0?UUr0TXx zysGbf+#LZv6zO0o&825lAaYEhx<lj<%+$$9_9D&#-)DwR?S(teuvCkc) ziSOCE^ar*ptBP|#{svi~kqqW-f8YJ2DSJWH3PYE5wW!h%N0(|4wK$ez)CO$6o+$x!p(eZ=LuG#J{PEYnJlYeyOOpsn z`k4M&a{{SS4eJT6+eIB_PK3=>kW~StYP6ynEAupnK(--yR_h4}fg&;~f4hN1jmBZ4 zGnX>q*{V50h&SxiLTxxDwcu=6^CV~GzQ@PlT~mmDK;4p$I2^B#414u1-tn}K=FT!^zNq|@9 z^OyLVJtle|l=1!MfBoCIe^v#4ia_|TgUxB6z}SquyAmCZsOU3E6?Q@}HL7~j(N_MD zWhy)`TN_l~X8sbg4yoHeuFKc-H@oZ;I@Z4_u4YpNUdo3&$$r;a(>y!YhK zFJG#tq%$E96nW1A7gWV^B}XH-XhA0d!PPi|B}F7>g+~F}o;S!zgx*B|wA@HkJ7r5o z7$^TeM6sYtqD7}~49B9hOe#)PxBL_SGa5i4tkm?;;l5LaP-9yT_ntJo6j>Iw58>93 z&qqBn)Sj#!1L)zbf7zPjgZCo2$~L;uRB_Y7dZCj)9H1>Mav2Z0BBK|Cpe_V?zsY#gq*egAIM#8gf7FP9$`o78N*+kLULy;7 zDrOSYlM^iLto+0@VmOyu5MxaKXHI3hzJRe|q_yw@Sa3NX(Mo+QE+yi%=3LH-x?bgh zl-kTM+2n>!x1ZE4x2lUo_GrG&E6wF*e!!-&yBKV5)6`jhqRqg4!Yy?+NQ{o!jvQKF z_zkWJ4voc_e*g^uUKO!{jRBj8-*6@{XyJK#IjKYW85Y; zl)r*Yh}l@MTg28tAsU)BJwIcAbcw-fWEJuKfmPE$gk|4N3Yis?Yv+ueMc|Fop;*0Il2^@m-!JujPsknRwA~Ef z6r`crtiu=KTrI=u8m?}+mEV2z&aap;DKX~w`me`pE=>k%tyhsqu1kh?s7!~vDxjey zkYS4se}Pg^?vGwc3ZscjS)nH2Aq0ihK~pTX)$UF7J5CD@fQ_&$SrLPK33-z8Ft0?X zF|Ohu$Vx>hzJ6eP;@Io3DSV`2J`jZxgOudtFdjA+V|kAby=hY2BUK%aStQ0Tg3gi2 z6`1HP8)U|kJy&?nBq%335%LnWM4Hapzas`hoL6sLg(bu~ljV|Q z14PKGw@nQYgluI`@P(=8v{Ov>p7g;9bU}{*ZU}H6*tP^PTZg4RVL!o^(3gk~g3Ub# zTwoWkTny`};2p!=97N;2Ixi30!}}98;gP=RZQrKxw{9y1e;KMu3Ygl!y0S|qu+6?A zf5-Kzgh_m)p?MzlR*y(?lcB= z*U7-@f<2s5UxIVJu-HAclTR)V3LJ7WkyvT(4&lSa?#?_CiC0{>-I1t2h=Php$oueuO4H=Cz9C6IiS(v&d%y~B_tgtjN?s1er?YwN9*B^jTjZs`>>)M>DpElEAC(Z=Cqo& zB`4gKy|!O*h+4xXiTJ&i>cccSf6wqRL?)%wDbY!yt}|01L5;MnySUArQk1}~~$1OMsI2R1dvRai%e1uX>DRVHT|3Ke_f9Ou7t_F2x zE`i8%mh6bGDrB5a@JwLso_FYz3C^L9!xkQG(E?jvH3b7t0X=A6GnG;|6;0^#31T_c zN``ypn>Ik%vTS&+A09s={S|Yv*~pC2s7HHhlcwwFp}HSDB6$X)>);#FxLR}AJ#Xwp zeNRmK5S_$uRTOR4r5W2qe{J%78(LBD~2> z-WapfI44UlhFb)Bi<@r2Hb%M7$cIOxotnLk=y;dh_u$Vonf_7Pe>qXyG9psA3-$H4 zXWhSmx|Y(Q!yQmy7F)rp=cmBGMRKrL@JIRryPjSNFf`{2rF*LJ6lo9ieYg|ml07Ef zUrC>mU685?QeOJzFaLhuk?^UM;5KmyD`;7|u;78-)ZLJYcQ~uGLBz4rD5re_@9DD# z9x8(Am-mY3(IVo|f72g1Od|c&c}1GTul+Pw^$mAo-lQis=e^eHlq~(zI7KN>x=Wg9O+^Z!J5He}?6rNRM{1L$`lAj%tO-mRk*0o4xCa~lc7f6kkDUJK z166ffBlLxhdBlxFcMtXampLi8Jh`KCp!tCj3j1g^m!u9Zf3mN7a3*b9pL>dSQf9*z zjP`pO1+?0?!7#vQ<9xIe(xVhO*9#&CozEJUKB2!tjrz|AawP-sfF;WG42*OYY44>Wl9iy?co^jRvd6hAukHU(91X4CX+6dDfpVbgO`y>bbjtT zqE5T}uFH5Zf4A{)*BiPs(^R}ruKz}0@6%a^gA^VZ0O)=$SkhR#`K8z=MHp9ZS028N zwjPV3bKgH2E;*Ffz5xX={siwV1Ur@JJ99%MZ0`_4c}T|@?y3V9Tbq*rFQW)af3rBFF#Mi1RLV(fplY~&Ud!zyo+8{; z)bU(et;kGyyD>0} zf5wqu!6{G3W*wtUmpcLdocf)|_W^#L9ZMi4q}e{9Jjja9aJPsUM-z!9aMSrt1*ASk+9hw2fX z6y;&22NUcG43J5+CnaLqb@l@8w94Bvx(7hl+nJhzpRlr@)8=c)1z1@xNvEE|0rkZ- zsFZztp`ECv@PH)Ml<_3BbM|cdn;t>ui$1K|D7b_c;)>t&Ec``)Y188S@=i(Rf6s;} zEVtO!_9tkc{rEbk0Ru~76&b{D$)Bx=ok{hXPy%$8x`6mF{|k%nIqw6mCdbz#2_?ch z(_V^EV<@>Hb&WMlbCgs^fcbs6$ypixS`(R%0A;aZY(z09;v*h<;(!2sE2{7_9)w5I zENUJK_RqsSoODkDr&z#QF%}Y?f9t69bz2|H=D%gu{+uBcloR0A`Px^6+jxfNz*$kw zC=v#E8omc=J;~UK3cpMpGeyRdh+0LJ0PG|gZYQ1oigW)vY9`fVh7YYe~TMRe0S70 zaYV(23f}A1k$@U|SyGU=`J9Zr%v1EHX~&G^u8TZjzJlVq7eY9zgGCR$mm%h!jF`z)qf*#LzxvQ(GyUc4!Q=HMDee?kxkl~j2YC$R#e z3zHcbu6D7@IJIiqPe46WbmH9>X+o)#Nq&Gi9Xp=V*R?d8Zu1s~6wv7{nBpDEQ&aYF z6iD6?@FNSKNgvDk7{Vwq=vJW^MF;3DXstkN0Ek!78(^1*HAQ@EC9AnH7zWYM5T;TJ zsKul2CgE<=5Rwm;e^js1P(i$$7EJXdOSo-=QG3r6CurFkn_bpV#rTAY8DH!=0&9+c zT_!dbdvaak?n2o`T4RI?Qum0{YcL&Jurkg_bb-^U?tnMoiC~qeYpJEB<}4m~4e>^; zEQ}NwU0;$+vX86(29mBscwq1DHpUn0b{D1X>_*)b^}@b`e}pz+@h}jl3m2+OP3%H8 za~0s@LFiieQPD6Gf@JMxioY%5te)FXl~sFW?9{X%UvC*P}gS0p|odMN>+ zo^Vqh_&PsTp++BMxv1-h6khj1vZCX`umz_j+*bmj-{tZy95L92XHh8oM>ynVlX8i) z(`bA}HRV-g7hoUZ?u2{Z?shf?WO7>e;7d>NRieDof9JDbWZL7g?}gRX5*wzH-n)35 z$w!*dmFaT7Dni{EQW+vY=gEfP8ty;^XtS-Fq4vcYtp?P8;c2yKAl)$3IKY5@m^nXk z7>zS4L*_fyl%J6JBY}OSG{@i_>K)R zdiqE_%fJ{xXBkNQDNR-^ake7-IT#F*v8VC27u-zQWP8W!icfRV;mJ3_85o`HaOVq8a2NkmxW8j$+a7-k*U(&aXfL@@nEaG-W$jgPjx7^h%dp>qZkU{W zu?C%mB`ul+Vw>HMN+~V_nluM+H3px#kBf56TkSdCc9`?b3yZqJ5I;653Y}~0eaGq- zPMag1HEfPfWum0pj)f`eaXR&uxWk>9tlFM+7&bC(LxA*A(L?Egf|a6oLhIzje=b6q z(xEtCUH^^EYjCY&M~xqQnHOEl9z18oFZY6wh}Xzd>9QWMCK$WdaN-}!HYeongyG~!4|6ZVNB$qj!-GBE(-RCBIc@heS&Hx#$fD&9WnrFupB^q zK9g|HBl;D=Z&{Lc9;Q82W4YD3f6k+D-DGguqHC0U_lcaweI+Sg-1qu^QikG&AY7uw z!Fhn{3Lr&(QGC-O?PjEPOyX2N!l^y1ijaOu+ho>#56_n9{>3*-GEgF}XujAF+@7yO zCUYcQm@}xtakW_6*B!8C3SO z*l)Oh3|ypGyLFFl4IyY5l!@uaE?(c2WJ)f;~f9Pw`MFI=S{l4i6c+2 z(94CqbTfhI=N*-5(d~dl)9&h$%UgI=k&wsL3m(*c)Cr zapSRAfJl%ebut=?#W90G8({zOr+bA-&$^dar0hy(B?b^A>f;^!-=StMjxOQq$3n&&V%P04v<_QS}DTON-y z5jZmL@yd=GzW%vye;l=3BK3Nz%YMr%5W~1x7l9F|={H6SIKU^1qS1`Y*|P~jx{hen zc58HSA|1ke-`H%Gc_CyIESaaWOQQz#oeCUMORN_|Nr3>co-jt{?C*o(vh4SZ*~$2s zM^c&uIn=*NGKozS3kH^~G-JrZY2vxbvq@5_jt&2Mp5L(de|{Iw`pFN-agl0?@w821 zi{-UcM=QMWZauY0_y<}s>D9_|@akg5^=2g`!#_KPcGC1(A>H-aeBajmnGFej5QmcT zXr}_(9=s#a36;Zn<6Q&>M@V-dsPv@GfQ6STKxDRNRtM0y<^LZl!Dw<%z)+5uR_D`W7S5#YU&N4OQapbH?K;iQP z9u89oq4Fw#D><+BNQx9;LOS-U?AXvmwE4r+>e6-Z*pp@NtVac@!#0Ob_YRL$e%ZB2 z%|ZhGe_UP_@dil@arq_ymh^MsTT8qE<&pr&bA&w@UTi<6*7voS9#<#gn0k8-Fm zAvOS=w*+0`FJM~5zXIWnL9g;|g_O+`SmCu_g@qD6(0K_Avu->AH1^*2VTva<842pT zy>M8X)5o7Y%O0GT+v@nSyk?bs(zRpQq|dmrf22Qflt;{$XjXdUT!V3I#pZOvWTo+-llEFwmlXrD+Z~)IOj~Yj7Kx#O!(02vFg;tWk+&@149ANJ6419JLPTYg!?SYaqM_zf3C8< z;)TN;o<2KG?#*Me38c&ftQy$|51y9tuTwdnPl1x`j}9elzkVb>K=keOuRm}6rpZ2$ zCH&yi=cl4S!6onjRVVw~%sFUCMWr9BOD3e_sW{Zd%q;I2HR4#Y?u(L@ma><1_%xwj zU6S`b`{JcKKqsBteFp{snaakSe~vO-6^{rvAz!2`(9!#~smB(GDY=3ZII@ui#_*rhi|}MAV8Fi+ z5;LQTp+zwp>cnx}Q)OD1ZoO-v{VO2MM zO3yOJAt`EBA$MLy6`itHn3hU|mw2$H(%y8Xa{_O7AalNBww|M7*j}Ozv2sh*S^det zju2^Mw2n!&>FScoMFJf+e_K;GTVI-RVYPlMqyyMk)|epQ!B7+H1H=NPfe*}~X4L#Pz?#BTX8 z)h0D{;I$uFTuxD+{siowxZp)1LA*gI1?19E0T*9>8@~{Or11Eye{`1pP+A{--N_c1 zHNm0Je{A{}os*eg5PM3^e$6_sE4CqSbaIkQ<-+A3ZLVloDt36P$VaFH2|lUwqcQgH z)lf+085S*j>vHl_GwG^fYQ>Sd{56}pT0!%RH9U*XW~#iYD9o~C8{9`59G@A~z=ndC zHRQ3V3P~j&nC>Bwe}vbJXb5Ir2c@dj4JD+(XZ8z46Uv6VN-}*V20FWdn7fC~RY2K7 zT+PnHpWE3_L1lvtw`B1}(@Tf7JD0{QHIqA*;H2=v_m9J^k;C4Y(KSAwbGVkq-Owva zKmLRkXV)v9_($W-v)C!!6><_NV_3~B!f8ViGouO;xOhlme{ht;?(UZ8V{9LE%*RV+ zTu=vj?sOpLQOxgaIhKWzBVHKe%_S(PNXGw1G$hSa9R|l zGM2fr7h|$Re>bIC^UnGFS*>D>oY8Ql(LQD;TYjx>T#hFG-mpi9xg}0IA+FchSQ7 zZz_r0`dy)VsM6C!W>ByjgQsq|i;^e+ePdXiNlFCu;LOFMg2MUsvsR z;t#wxR+%(TFRpg2bTmyWVHRc=kvytrO4pt8a*>v^xFX=z-B1W-T%u-3j=D z>2MGhm65Da7^NLMG1tI`l@V16>#@QL{RemW>+#pAj&7=P>Gi~C2JC%FqKTAfRMq=g ze<)@gZv;9R6WxJBrRHv41Zh^m+;U^z&u#Yl95{?<^_;UZ!=||YJ1`wXwFPV*;T7mq87cicrN7X7Gjf5GZFo)@Ftd z03#_jX8-rSY9Etl7B}Cj!EBLWO`rO1 zo4q6I+<8KM%JY2ObYRIHuP6pQgedT_`pz5i^C?yTOiN%BF}4bAf#oUYwrR= zhJwstA#;Zs%8dA)EP(JFL(8P(Fa(^Mpkj ztA3GN=>s@So52eQ(FOYs?vSDtSI%2`XBXJNuD~V z=%cKj5@b`s(`x%)qGEe0rOFT@MuZw1pnpVN=h8zSF^Ywo2j~2+S=o{+Jb|Vz(C#;q z7`6}8+`XQ(gOYNen9u|{vf7=q0)g2CXxqo z*th}&l4P?qtOHGL=M|XYkmmtWF7sQJGw0;g+0NavLqWT11=qCj5hB>3=OT(|&#Y~_ zsT59>Sb~b1=;gfwr+-eX>3CCy#Tz2(q5P#V68@JOIZgudN9WE-pX^2rig6yBDI{uT zVtLN_$s&4Fq-5#Gl$JXIEX1jBTY4;Szq?=_UNTBcRmt#7%r6BVYB zpP0k7p#}u&0<{2BlfQp#E!ZaEQ$T8w0D^HD>79UL4?rv1qGP(^O$5?)ti&UF>W%m2 zNykabYl%NkDu_G|^XtN$aa@O3+UQ#;5_*%SZ;IsO8YWfwommV-Dm4mgx*itXxn=XE zB3K$^d90SULw`Ud7P;=Z^!_>Tq893c^RDQN&lg?M7iGvu8d58M-du(dqHM!i*K!t~SuNF~3 z=Dz#7=r7J%(l@`4cQ@`DV$V<b?m5~5Nr2^-62O) zvz*5T`hQyn;V8m0hBTN|0q#5QnT1*bjLsyP;U)mXE(T6a7-ti%Wt4mBYjUbbd77~d zl&CE@I9Nk}EnMA_g*)dOIRBH3;rQoKFPwEH+!>>+bRi}}WDP^MeEqFvO9Jp>Rc(f& zH>G&vF&m5r25uOf*iGuMiesh?_(2I{B?%ey0e_5~Pj;!KyvXl1HIa!9$WcbCDN5<) zp~oa?UT`4L%*rmrAqC#R2aol+;vqWY5{XmGXp$w5I3x&CjM)w(cke&LeVS_!C;6{h zsxK=Tczqm#<{CM}+>xq?s(^pLyvKDynae&NV{hOlFS(?L@cniKIa-F!}JKnexa>FHDdvPGw}45$y3#bgs1 z?ugd5bh0o@E>FB#d2%T*+Sn2_;Cs$?|d45I!2%Oi3G?Rs4jVyVs_E5wC5M!Jde zp;Wf938pCIhuI(HUko`!FItK=_%8{Y8L;a64g^W?W z{^{uhUM=umHk>Mhm%+6&{k~2bz z@FL(E$H_WG9(A)iE*-O1g)O5PCSm6_6+Z`gc@rtFyv=3QI483wNgt9*G&AP<)@l8{ z4{u+FBaS+NlvdO{E@A`PiRUgqfs5<^1P(+cdOeEqVRot@8nf97>-{s;`hQYIjh8A4 z^Wd}c8~$pQeQLeiBS!u(*jXuG4D@5NN+Rw1)p!ntEbjf;f}^=dYwqbk6J}z~OsRzp zkFM3Z86nS9ZK++Y#$EhAA9xs17r-|$7Vmak9?j1&|@>bEXeKynF4 z|6JtIT$;i}cYYHgLq{2aTz@)?c3+KG2r^;PR&+&x9jw1)iftDjFbaZE$rM|NEjBjh z(Ff)mj@+b|2^*_QsWZB`=NW#4kFyz%w`}T?G+Q8ISgiOtvr70fMORA!Re!z|*<`hHFf?tneZ;9JX zQM2@caI{qwiT*#t3=S&EDb5R1dgF!FFOSECF2zhWF6ty5~&FUx-q&IP1RA_d2+ltOi@wL`)E0Dl_EHIXXmXz}EeE92MAI&6r z7q;!>e7DrraV6feNb{S|8`jfeB!gteonpa$06lY9)I?0tn~>sh5;-}>rrgY`_Gy_z zpHVJEI~bXwoPX+EE|iUzbP<7~bNQ8+e6n8z^u1lMv)V^hzdaO4&6SN7H3vIsxhI8(lLz_HoD*MIkYGHNKr)vl3Zo8!0Sq5^v$ zSkm=(HSsqI>_3Kxw4(%vN(A*H4-fDZ5Xn$ijuVb}Jd;K?(e@D@2AQv+18Zqtjy}^0;&ut5Is>R>Tavjk;n~B5} zD0{9D|G96Q%D348?j_9h5nV3olyl;42((LRnt!tEqgpQAdnjoe7K-Gib+VS6JPb96 zDwK~Zf{++Xz>FY)a`tKsgpw3-!ptRrkc40w$Ew8VS=F^eNFkUZ%cVH(<-Yva3l)D3 zd2rO|n zS_51?l0`2`f5U47`sH0Hsdzw069?iJj~O{^i_A!(6cLVRg-D~eT47AuvlM!Sn}3T1 zEqAInq{}A;RXIykqeKPbhRPVDrKwnDkL@q%Sk-F)pK;?nksVHGcG6sbwy$)1O$6+)M^Gvk%4J30~rol($%}H@hgt zA+jHcZhH*AZ4IZcaDbUEj?pJ5Gk?f+g3nK*F8mnkP4tmCqvk)UJ%slcU64=O*9)ka z(}m^EY%N!pHMl-}?`V?OP7ovIsod_&WoPb8R*H>|*|{??)=!cs`;GdP zn8&6+SlLBEk5ld@$ss8GkqL+4?P1(q|7Ft8moYIP3}2zqK@W@xojdZ5?SH1`FtZ-h ztD^ez?HZ}SK~yZZB+%G)3OHp^(1+P`67geaa%Gc7Ll!*lPm8`NURBxiutT#4tIfmj z|2pG(|A6Z~$-cZOGh$~9E$x(o7IsgYc2`m_;j+w5M|i9+32g6t_`$D^fDN{DIyHFZ zK9J4M)Ks3N!l-dW<+RKu6@N;za{N3AEIJ;CtaTl&KBPBu)oY!gT}T>GRs_=zXHHl* zAci5EFNHig6jwD-)wjYEqYeyB9mFu5JOf$QO)idzPpeUipzzvDb`ljl zRq_OTPQGYjcdPci;fF_xYTfO{!EOkF)MjHl&_)&{5ekZU9x=gyrhiz~N=~YXMy3p2 z9wRdVX@;>xl22=NbX(hoMI@K3&v{o8x$`~h#2qy>yJF$Zo_jUuG76EggQd9W5&ui1 z@Keh`p`y@{33X|U4J=MqL_nFoENT9_^9aL((UBjq219^AA0DS$BYYxOyv1N61n3o2 z)}6xE+L?QjL3PB;(|;!6GK$HRpaG~%`8s4>Y<872l$|nx<1N=DzrU5_5Ierg>$wv7P=%6oua-(=RHcy#Evb zL-$@>g`{|`ZEV=|7~Uzu2Ew~vKyai>p-{Q}PI`)B-AVu7CwDgRzVAK1=QIfrjUK7e z@#S-3E&!hZOy^y(yD$NIH||^#qh+;zJ@TlY4Id+3&l}Fk4@n`ew6CIRUd~u&rD&Vc zAla8y4%n*>M1S-zRVrpv&57R~s%0`37HjHN+ws35A-?Btz*A~=6t|R zZAENvvk#e^=u?YcPBdZFDcp>Pg@Lsv2U1pJX4?ThE=ZsKzf*$or0sT65iV?4{0feO8OcS0#MHH0f~;^pRad6&WhMkbGk9G!sQ5!n#+eOHMgNk1W zVtm=qwZLPn)0eUEqvFyEq6TrSSfb}rhU^-;?XZp!W?D+II!GeR0wG8C^jY#l_k zO0>frz5qp#f$_76!7*p9vHO0{M>qR|9e+Y{C8kOyzokNtfbz53!AujE9|CRteCc*# z_#kZqU#xOaXE|a8_g|(^uNj|By$jPa)^K7=0{u%K!q2#%oKx2>R>w;Z&_D(g=&U^!-PrN6FOE9Q8M2*x&LySE{rS+vFWLu?SN^wmwyyQ z>^;Mnm_FS(6zw;lxnX<~^;%WvPGn@MG);U2sSZogmQJ=&`gU^`y(iEUT`Xg5uqEuKE27MGe$z^c$RMtv2|%Qn|7hXJqGJAZ zb#Tqtb7K41iC7^^=|>mZn?xZKy?^(t8MoBZqeD2Kj5R5<=8I(a-kx2yv98X9 zpH}F=6>3b(_J7%#xEoNL#XDVxyauIzoghUi@RasWo#OUNZCyZ(ODHNSATHkV{l1O zpYf&h6h#hwC(}vCG6BAWdYNYGp&I=!) zms(J>D2GyCJjL+M#3!6MmwzfO*bC1*b?-=9mNhrvdfXDaz3QabYr6mKIcTuSNpGtE zcsb26_4TZza99Wz4#3rGfGJdmf>}r5W|VwFhaiEkiZ^H4+clLw>u|rnKm}!fSI&K)FPoBIiiNoH!0V$xpY$|KVvSMeoT3-S$Gp>1n=-L>mv)yz; zFH>Pt_K7%uK>?DbfPcP9(AbHyc*t;T41fI#qcXGqgD|`*-wsFcRVvz4@1YA0dE}A* z81>wz?SljylZ$5q1Mx8$q;FJ1dljMsrO^Y8STNrsw3?uzdI*TD%FAeRIHzW&g(R{n z$v82xIhUkfv#%?991GmW5lcNWikYm$fa4xf$$v;TgCNhAn$zw&y=eQ3 zqA9ZfV?1j&n@s52-MlW!7~WWr#56q=lcy!IYsOU&B=B*l%Gymx(A)(*`AHYVn1>IK zM0P_({Jr%AvmN^+kjVlMAAW%E7$9@iz@FA3ait6+InRWSg!%DMv1iIej7E)OwJ4|1 zs)sOZUtNZTX@8XjC=rtCJS$mJz&`4y-h1E2x3_bo=Os$;w3_#ltJW7zkP6KHmLUq= zb+5*+DjB|m#HW$^o17%6ERSEQUz>U~i9nko`8^CmOug~%k|JC<1~w)zncBO~Skyn` zaJm0k#H)TLB+AT-3CFHtJ5)~U9>gR>ys*?%#)!i=cqp&2?zG~*HWhp!q9 zOGaiQ6p*yiP3kIVgC!wi)(ViRTj?NitHD`Z{1l1cJJ!6QejeZpDtdr9z1R-H@S|N@ zfKVd4riX|;UAZDL;;D6y<*TK_pv?F*V<~Gw;FTRpT9v4BDby2U!KgHy*TzWaru1A3 zb|#NK#(#tw7>mptNN{@WgYfu?fKLx8zggp!)pxW{AU_ZpbvrIl6i0JUZjqQO#8!)8 z0>0@&Gih)we1XD|=7Hx%DlzMSySsJq;zxuU=o}&VqO2NeT5b<1KXgU7uZ_~dfKyv_ zA})>=n&2hTB4=rW3N)iD+$sX0GYpa+oqBcXtABk1Jn7o7{SGg*Ub;5n6!nC03X~h3 zZWoQkfu#Q7rTEO9zWDsy)hG0dc(Kx@7^7!*QS@YW*;A)B%9r>-XTo<)^!mFZQn6LG zl>1*mpKyDg%tPe65W{fkjiYZ*Q?T41fAUkdCqg~I5ZGwfBgE{mgmGW!2HR{5_|&_! z@qbOkzlw6PG~3{9DHO5 z)Qjc^p*ah@3%M#&>rUhfqi9wcEw*Ldr%9|1G$sQlKZv7h5cYcz@%ib>5Wg!6@(_8C zZ+$avvJg=5TKx26#h2VdQC;)^|g>uMUYa3LnysU zC9fg6Wx(?|O~f=3@8cR@{X>$>?b!>GN3c|ZrcRHC_HJCU_g)~HnPQ@n!l#Lf@F&oj zsxjek!3Nl5QC{GN`Z`mj1>qF@oqvWNoz7?ByVX#j1*ng4?mR5+|0N~MoF-XVHH14` zG+dhd&aAR~*KZuhLrdmq6wkw^Dw@5W4hucWUU<5;g^U>M_q+9}y-mhHxKoc!)2e=A zc&Zw2(KD3$shC1>0+iqjv3{c&InNTaRmi-B{*2j~%B4^+CjfFwI=gvdsDBd$OmO>kJV9 zK|5z2n^-R<2q<%(^iuA0Sa9lDk)|03|JGO)^suA4rACQE-d*q^p4F`GhhrOaE*b4` zZ!!toOOvQ&xr3`@Z*1T7SAW~xaQ&ZKwN}^>U(PUq6XgL2&k=Zht>wqmYBO>Gq=ui& zrG)cyqY^!@A*;LNZeo+$LLCI9ZHL;Cu>B(s^r&Asc7Nf)bVov^5=Ca& z+!0uX7R8qCD38@(c{YGG4BK1uI>BvF^jCR21wT_iB~Az9SjdY~=@vx2;VvaNyI3rC zQR!kTIuE9BMzdZLcVdi7AaRg(@v16Wi*rp}fHQlqE9uhk@PB1OSpMPe1l(PKVs?jH zia8W-yje2ryb)|S6@Rq=D~jM};U9SJ)OzlF&}N7U6a}Kgr#`k(pHHC^>uG(q^bE+e z#OU|J)N}V_U2^nR;GE^00^|#ennukJh`|@CGAi9M$qt_&)Ta2(AO8E3SOHysC!#>6 z4x)&+x;i)Inxv)_?EJQst~9I3%8|=f*Efe}s)tlMKXalYkzz@7?uEbv<1$LD^;&x!gCnpVPh4GHBBF69Vy*s~==Lkt_S=`{&u zEYu|1N*X&fnxxHrd~lBFvr_BTA5a490k6|e=bn_i7JuqPDUO#W6!ZfOCpKPe*QNCr zc$!>swrn0Kl$Vf%o0`*+JXxM*Ka_}{^#qfWYdL3EZM@CB$AxTnL5^};^a~Wi8FH_d z`c{WMvkiB-qs>t2<*;>W;6?u1tZ(YCvWy?nP!h}FmuQBCQKi%}zK%BlL-7{LD_=b^8X-G#` z!UHFF*y#&HHb9Ounp3d+**!G+fp*|7`VV#B#D88)?xm6&M6}H{UXuv#nh6q1(1}f^ zo-$$7VTU?}9H`*EtUj7?EKN^uKx?Uwqu<1kQVvn!Y;%rHiJ{(k?K~3bNM5Urj}24# zMro*U0;9!A__<89g(I+51!Upu1v>RlC1nqHCnSjHn!QoqA=aMuJTMzMPQ{?7 z9Dk59KGhLvcb5h|Md@lV&dD}icMw%bmz26kBix_TwZ#u~UFHcf7_o@^|Ek1EJ%Zi1M2t2QeUoqi4qBnFirQpu z_arzlJFmz>r}9%W+}^0OG3`AxzN5xce}CM0rs12qu6e&hnwn#3$~0+Wdxe*t7p!rn zEd~Cgvh{ME$*^Xo=?&v8H8&Qj7Z!tPbJ1IKH;s4~`VU^7l39=4u5PzyT%8!1AllBL z2O7OKpuN^l=y;Ru9xL!P1Kd)SE7S&}XpO@AVU zgqC5uicuOJ%OLfUTxMMtyMC%ylYJci(h%;|pW1fa5&{uP zWVbT2V2~$E0O6+tCnbC=)@LcOQh$5XMx+yy23lC)@^?UXq?@mzVkJ^Gj#X>9Xi0ba zY(F+JO%Qp_gWrDoJSX`RFd@woDpQL?b35vVX1Z!Lb}E5K>$+OnTqy>l*S`Sr~HD1)~%yp7Wyl#g`Yw zAmb^ERp{Mbe|tV!M2a-gByEDgw^k~!>_MQ&#nynj*@9qM!~Vd6jy6)UXr}C7KCTEw zPBDgmxku;`R--@(rS+Id;NZ%?JHKiDu?wV|MRV5*;MN1P5f2X8gMVF3LtK<8i6UMi z-Q~hm`MN#l%-$qkt>`l|(@92$2JgW*dxn^4z6J>QV?9)H7o-S|BcE%etxr4eB@^J~ zcF}gE-PorXNSc1pjUqWJ@5sy_LyX93cDQjV2B?7CeJRH~gna!_Uf~KmQ5T#b4pp}x zT3>}q8nt>jspt?xMt{m9TPn~sPoX<;;PHTIN!2E&{o2Qlt#mEgw#BMz)AOA~oa?0d zy(Z>b0fDEBfh3eaB>70*FW~^hI<@C5b$^7CMMYZ45!lScvWxfulL?YJsZ8h-Ja*Q3 zP(r`4OI%%N-(eH-Y)6lb8N|agx>kKlk5c=6@ydSrPjas@jTa3zZX< zuIc&umUV#-+p9FH-i$bgFYsws-PO(%?M!TfJ)U{ut@PX(CwdX z{v50%jEyM+_l7|`t7;YkBQ}_DiE=J zNqMMlzQfGmIe#X`mj%vE#lkXaoUKM^#6syS0=l>=gvIsX@r!4lJx(i2C1wJhI z*p&rPYRa*yNwkj1mwpUoFDd1M2XUM>HFEa~t`*|sB5CZ!MNg|pm2^*B&lRI{D=5^> zPu@07Sp8JMkVN(@xO>dw<~wbozAVBPt0{`xzVn^q6nyM7w)C*%2k3_7xljH~NzRve zzDi;FHh*GFdr6j;&rib+z;ucu`zcio7e&QYNDusd_TXkNRTO`tT`#^JBH#SLq1m!8 ze#hdtRdeo%aA5HsVcmp6Ce5;Z0#`GM3Lp}ao|!$P`%Va>)*>-IE9n4EB^M#I>1|Nl0KsFi*fhRz zz7C}P(K=nj2-_2*Lh53wCB^6mExFQz`oiH#Mn3_N7s!0bUcuywsDB>Hr}L)eJ(v9{ zrvn1%|khkKzDe6cvR&t;D%jcf~U z%giDeWG*G%z+^-0RIVMuX=mN1TqI%gs8*RHVV27J$aU<`yJEY=cJq7BGC5|L(3pn~ z^0z9L0}{^0g}ja2r-^r+C;VLPiU)wus(*6*C#C$%FygU*BK?U=z(pp3{dsWNdmD%Y zJTHR?G$MRStE#(O!5F23gkuwWFoy6eE~!3^Z< ztWtN){yZ!C-ctW>RZ7}l5hNPGFw$J+iqN%picnczZA;dKhA+6-z8(+~Enk-qRbxRC z%mN5~j+``&uv@x`|I3jcM5JMt552}!EB=~|2p zIU7<5e)l@Tv)}24#4+y=2IoaJGE(5O;#_ZwRaR;8AMcoLjpz?BSjCN03Xz+D>U76$ zz;gS|V^Bohr-B)kEuo27&8sQ5xGH#jr;ZZV2_`8~#Jd7N-wnB=O9bU7J%5+0BD8`Q zuX&x9)TY*D7=bC!03uSfxK+eaiBmdSLAgl{)EThnfLI9mTPEnq3f{hj>VWVAT6kW$pE+axWF)_-*j*6O;6RDs+Qw#YG zJ71#cj$AaPu6~AY?+Ah|<;K8>$v52x{^Ls)s0I zrCqK>!TLV*D{-8kkJY+7AYIcbO)|PDU1f!-Tcyp4@Xvuy=oKgjd~6X;Hgf-`WaaqW zquim&%HC;GW5(-cgY#4f{@5CFh(%S4lpbZ-#|Z&nklD%l*IdMzH-B@!O{opJ7{DZ6 z7*MfYQ8G9Mp(IV6v;brE+{>zq=6`%wY5%AS5s)E0D@W;g47m@0P<`Sw&ZoS^#YCU5 zzd>uJ~3?3$V^feO}y_; z*^44+ZAqH%01gRMBY_MYPz3N(c1b&giq7}j1`7MS@bWs!CT+OLD_Z)nY4GR0h{**n zbYt$I)gM*?su@wL)zVZ^Sm89&p|+bzPOKhIWCY0XLw~4;e-Ltdupvnts#4>pzO)}W zA%;8)`+%FiHSFyeNrsW|aTGiBDhAvT{;DKv^cOyZjzz&dvkpCL7kbxc(_f}oQw3iS4Pq8?jo zX+laz|Cy*jKt;%H>ah`b!tgVsa;k;JDUf^4Ox_C*j$U0&e@aDn`}KJ6XNmchQ1ql} z97`EFb{Op|ZS}~opqq86<>rYlMELgc;L*5C{C{0a>#1<1yY*4>@{qp!7t3%)LsQaV zb)Ktpi!E52iN3#q{VgOd*r=&oW29Ee{uCOY2nm?qp@dDRD^BSg5j%%|Dm}ou>2Je< zmSFOR7N^At^U0DtfyH#$@nvn?Hy3dczv;tAD0Y;WFshsrK`}^~SEDe%BDn(VEET5# zR)2QKh@?G~_}b1ym0{R#9J9{GluTgw;brn~kOQEpeEaFzD^jU&jn99yCpIq2?F zbl@JN$G8Jd>QrI%D)^=i=8!YMZ3$2>_0X01Y9o)eV-*ut;x9}bPs~QQvx@Ulkz&;M@4x>={g*ux>a+j1GM#wj~s1SdB%~) zgpNGwcbMXoyCh^rP=PmIEsxIwh)L{Bg*WUmc%@R1@0~ zaf*}15ITvh;d#G9wUT@Q>dx@ivF!|4L)?F>>>0Y+=!|(t4 z!8;)<{Qm!aFUM0L**M?2r3ZPFmdxFrB)>VpI#Y6}G<5WUj*20a7251|f{2-zI`H1} zqK!@zsq%ugwP)ne!Oy++UT3Q5bYl`#fZX=|WmA>aD9bPM*)+W@B-)x$$bYb1Fg%AT zz<279N{EL-hna=Q^GvopwUG#|e%Y?#G=_RuTl7@P)ffpg#tUR>tjCh*b2*G?GHRET z;9HtxN5*wn+TmS<8L7g&3^EHPd+#x0TBr zaE+dU&>_mmJBC(ziZtRw#eb!?%C%AJul++4M}Db|30l%-`VfoqLJDhc$Kea)Sd9Ne z$p^KGh*VMyfECR-hH=d;O2}TKtqGi%b|-o(?XbiLwj?e-XVU?;Y0`(ItdVK$DRwk$-T3DKx|shYtxs zB9-IV1?6O!I`aV=Vslu;F+y7xc}|SxcX3Kb%Q{W5S&bunZ%!9Tgn|qOiX9muK-glfv?uo({2~?9 zV^0bPT6_h!HLxDDiR5bNVfo$&--IUMvaU zWA-b$qvR3v2!Hv})ApO}_bp|+#G`i>WA8kA^eEhhs$rl~D5ky+H?tYzE^Hzvma`vC z@pjVvmCv1^ZBR>w^1jr`JVYp+^0St~-f_rBeWr_{8$^1O=KvB)!q$&F8btMPfu@tr zwK2HXqb*m)oN3xMEF%+=o$LP?`~V;Ut2^|b`~hv%<9}&Mr(eni$Ax6%lZo&hnq55S zfp5xxP`!aD_%1&`)A~g<0Z44Iw@u3GinR4vs)N6gj&<$ZT}iAU`Fl8HeaC8Q0zSf0 z{Gz-P2`JEX4ua|c%qI&&(@6B ze;><~W|%xxX9z^M@vQ8_QK$ItLNr-&8y|4iJpqn;P{tmF0fujcnsG>+JC(JTGDAe0 zet*Q*d?M89#?+}$0s0Q~U9jFd>d7;%tQ&BaI4DTT-A3^6!4Hpc45g-qm%RJv(FaF1 z7ixOTyc~}tH}aRt@r=rwm3e@iAx}#2{H5%nT9baIZ!m)2EFqI7aI{f$@{%_3RFF(} z8!LSfgB1B2A%+pmX=QNVt`f*d*$weEEPqoaYM`ke)FJwx{V{j_Q;@UHQFzS7pj1XO zVf#3#qfH+Iq)xOFjBCLn-%%w$MHg?1D)Po^$tczn@GaQ5i3!-Ycul_2 zcbZrrHZ@w?6j0N>9CHPq^zw;Aw!zcNK^mcnY#KA*w-qC;-A}pnveLAUNI5>Nq`a}&>3N^BdG)RD}O!a9nr98GH6;QUtTs27B&q1U9M-tRX4f{yhz!)o*>j##OU3 zb{O86GOUur6rb(YiIK78){mG77vDMM3RtFX+wBMwc*D32#5e zlxMXLe?054Pm!H#W%pI9GVQG>R-ak`aw_J6f?^bt`_`MNWgZQahO+jkviJY{Yt zn3Jh40iq&G6fmeiNp%&xG+_tLM;+yK|-9wj`XT{gtQ>B^N_*Hh;c1TU0LTiKT^eI_;5eMi2h zS|HPTbXYQDPa>IITfoY6i z2r0zf%+}-RHTAR;d4Fn;NqwTW?@6&rMD@bjlM-T2y`Ud=>L!e&0n`a?TgToibIFZY z&8%{37$hpN%8&|QpEHDzJqIeY{wdG0GS3$%Ubs7TZhVTr|c6`QWn$9?!AB3?veJ5h-4{_VLpXAs!)FVh% zNl+{_z?dRSPCucg5%iXVg2 z{NXIXK2Gbjq<=>ob-r{AD6^B^nzya?w6uL2J2@T0(_qqZmvo5V>=RNB>sh(->#C0y z82bc1Rke!DoZ4u8v5&%K*Qm^Bcr`|8EGghBH=^f&#Vl-FF7nWD!)f|fk8xcvIF6hv zdbe6aksFrp9o}E~0*Bp#RGqdZX|L22$~ly%_cxgiY=1Tt(I<#Dw5lkXzvZ(L3Rro- zx8B;m^xEDBk+c$acf1f{t|QT^xstDqUEc*WbghY%D{E*`LqxFMX>^AA$Y4SBbdHhy zPHb+t-L*Eq1{|KZbP&=$|~j z1o`@Pcz@vd*KTaU=c89LM;-%So%+<*f6e_dqtDb45OfTcr)P}oPYNT&>R^jxhv1G$ zKl)$P2>yLMtlt9Q*&8(m6eZz|y95I<{Bo?D#H0iFks%IXh>prMx6$B!Skf|ETcxCsF@4t+zCL@A6PE-r}U+t3HX}f-r>Qp2ClgUY17<4ik^_f z!hh(^ZPZ9NpTari4SN-b35tnO9y{}?Byc!o)&ic07#Wg%n0j-{V132TB&r(p|ZRb<$D%L5fn?is@TSme{U1wYIYG;UU!V{Du3F; zK=6*|44dq^Ex+p~^MlxqJs`|BqX^@_cFSt&h6V-}%8d6mw2lBrS;ekebTPA>O;v~K z9`3=urSMNEYpEO4zCPsq!U%`R2IuowhO?6N*4~nthF3K~QB(#^-9%$CCQ_JwWkz=v z>>1Hz3a>uGX~_g1Hy#(Yq3i)_ihn4=>d`QXUKW#6$#4X!nqs#MMId(qsR%XqBq+|{ zkU2UqrcKzvNjl7l&ro!0NG`ENW-k~DFxm+;A?#inSX1cpJ+rAP;-1HS6thwpPK{=e z$R8@H?p=u?jPX^gNJaU1DAiVDpK6)i|Dlt57*3Q!lKy%4l_Ec6vG(C3!GAJ`_)gtQ zmDDX(qv&KJGgOtw?2`&}$fsppj(?7#Oh9!BpZTmSH#n4xayu(Xyrd=qLu|*bsrFc8 zPmj4Ja~-+~M<^u~Q`V@g+JJtXp4}`p%Wj1c9PM4IqH=8mPjo9c9RLY`e zHsvbpIiMy`WA>H)^WyqHF)Yd1Ew1V%q-Z($6Y6}#n965MR@5++Y-P#0(}-tKKuFlS!}@?b_F}c1Jt7Jr6aw-Qi9m%L z)j^uoazt%7bn*neB4x^GC0&rZSIf;aHUbf3cLKFE84W}U*csMhh666V-Ls_Ph>YVC zopxKPKv8^EbrebxVSh+`&kTYTh#<`*9fOC0H|Iq}Jw9_0wWojo;dde%7%rBABCyg3 zxJpElY*U(ZBIKlv0Ogq(%?x|vaTDTpgLn8M9JXD1MStPTi%^~Q*~eiE_jco8r8m_$ zm=SM3IWYN4xN+s+KdpvDIx~eDyCev|`{*5#3-J9(TD2mn$bVV=wq-x63ARtjH(yZ^ zEC;F@f|wYmq>CJdj;0j1gy-*_?yH`(|hh@ zsu8_atW!#?Nq2>wJjWaURPJEDI~bM;4#h{5;%0r*68t(ZmL))b zP(B8bx}0YE+J9MINB%Bqw6DDnABS*iu~$emy~wEz9cR&K=)ftv1uJ!505}ea60zB- zn)^Pmi#cd?n!A^zrL-~6X>`n7;KsMY5A^DR^mF&zj@phjuy~%szr?-$IhYlaA6-&4 z%2my(;D%dA8+{``cDP&3E+HL(GrZGSNl-J*#iyvRjOwB$bFj5~O9 zfwo{@(A9FIwpqe_D)xGNOHP%Exk9m`u38=q&j7r9t-5F~Ejg0z^NbIH8*4u5X@_;m zXNgXaeU$1qtRRArodkYzPF%Zse0^lKnjVfm_fs20$A#tkSBvOPGT8Uhc5I%}C0;&V zv7-Q~UVjkI&?gC!rVDI&dbs{`ln^d}iN|KlFXucI(pb1zv2c&rK%h*~1Mu10Ptc?wzsX{K_Gi@KnDJUkIQX2W~CYjBtFV716vZlwIrwx*3 zaDQZLz|XrZnPEh~AjuUh!8L?t^9Pq-10Gr^O}8&f+_T<#4lBtpc85nyI9 z?S69tI<0sv$_E;i1XjAyIledVQ5MJvw+?|@H-M4vO#uEN;*TvMFx&*lLz3bg!+t|r zm@EeEysgWmQ5<`{y_;JgI#HLE)_kq(!zSde%YV&X`c( z?Kgj2B`iewv1`78k5dR|$Lppg?I+cmg@FMDs@z86$tkDq6U=Lgylgu85<+%j+>~vv z$f?jo*>r7OkU4c5F0ZdjZ~w(})4pIpCPaXt@esB|1hDdK1|6JgP(-;kz?t9c?!%g6 zFauv}jxFc`C}84Y_Ia1b17ub1_?D^_lHGs%Y8xtRcG5Vjj3pLM-x^||6fiX!Q=UW) zRCEtEbeU-VaIr4D5tsXl6iT0as8gAEQE^OfEtL0a*tRV_%r`jzd-@0j%WKcsU}`N> zCeg%DDZ^a*n${w9%~OSBIexv8{muVa#!?}u9@ka)Md^`;$F41ly~$Ju6N`>#R`-A1 zD&$@f!3BW?SaJ0>c}TA0VWdplpDq)$A-_MVdeuPSu8Q`_U>_23;xL7kqtl(H3dmt} z`g-qJdzigc;pICk zGCKB3#P#?7SnB7_H8r4;uMsd(kvD%au@;3P%GAakYst6cnr+s--t%P8X?oaCE{cx+ z@JmWzzsbmPc*tlM_k+=xt$&Wb`a2(f@cwLf*3U2-$R4j&=tVAJGeLnRB(Kpro8r>U zu3B#DfL0c^ote1K5Uf_vw%~SJYWsAGt||-wEFi70$Offq@_|9Rebk$!4JWS9NX}}v zLUU2y;U}E|siTQ@Lo0Y&|z@c zII!T-wT?PJ6l7|lOI(EKIdFf6zfjUe9rB4`O24L4LpnQb1%Y9q=y*g?4@D&@1{p zJ=87V{N;Z@QSi-Q{yjGtu$s;tFa4&t|2_4$vu;%9P)c6E-IIbVE(?Q%bR|=_p$0=0 zBeEC~iSuF{D^cT;I+3*rVu5=A)+ucfO^EdP6SFwZrh2skS(i=P2T_%Y$%$q;ERRYW zV9Z48y0OZ6|JSeUvzqKT{gsmeQ`R;?sMpSh0X(4dc+z%^)Ab%Ou`+t|nvM zVz?0JWWOssO=DYhl&#k)OpK$(SrxG}Ph31VQ4X-iR6u8lwcUT2;=*sje3?249t0I6 z$5nGYR4f2dG&vVf3gj{dpGW!PS1nhfqI1%SNOKY4GnB*}H13BF3K#sD*~5(!e%Qo@Y1Vi6?KjXx29TBDsuglDD$ z5$*~1@MINN-1b`A8M8KR1W0Bx8|}DbS-(g<$=vgO=bU@4dt_B20?LGDHY6%DGQz|C z-gD2-_v7t)d+iAuUn|3Vj-Z>)1x0taK>>d(cpQJ;DYFPkbiAby+VhZv12z!|e?-5H zb>N$CU94tMAFFiR(-ID1t4Ca>VH0==ul`a5Z-qE>bqC}d>ERUhuuLzesp!z znWx?xI-F9AoFInM?ypk&OULNrtkIP&`_rO;)-#H{ONXPNPpmJzvmd0rB*O$IC2_@v z1SNkZuxZCKIKeH*rTu_k4Ex{sQ6avX0vl5K6g-gvS_4glA6LpuNRQB|+`iT@E|59U z>YZKI)^I$ss!&(K(mVfB8*xqHrZN-RQnFx8bgmkBj&Ey~V;9A+cZUZcrynAFO`R$! z&1Q}w9G4fWy2v~<$%`IqSc#hVrizI-$BKXD$V1T{xN0G$Kz_&NsUocV(QWDp=F}Dp zhX!qUSpFTnNvY!zYah(N&`98^v?L!xS2mSRbycd#)+%M`L*K2Hf8T>XcxV1lnxx%H zK@u-7t`$YpRRLtDhL$DI1O@PhPYN1s8Glw^LYJ>iOXABJH_fTxHX((woPDHyhcJJI zZ@pvRr(9?E>f1vgD~A`+q4!pj12+%Nj5g;XS$Y{80^v|$3vfO3lN`}kDmGQ;ytcr* zI&e|;sPo?DE#Kx~H8a)!5HSX5bL4i&G+fyevpF>(;2M(^WLgD|hC6_<1em}tmN zIT|sLbo(3@pk`z~SL;|bSCDYkLu}5&fR>*dHMFPB#5u~U9 zn`1e{>)yFJa)(vMr1u3#Y`ixi;2Tjlh4PaVntf z>F*$~A9#Q`epU6&T;N@Z5fYW@u4=7`jD91_ZYIkiL%d04TWnREkBu&K0(vk|Ain~a zB~ZpZfw+YH2xb$tt^cM#d_H#aJgdb@qejWrgkd|YbR+y|s}S3bF2rvph-cLp>*(M` zr*)SpOFBSppmLrVEhA-3_Y;4P)GV)ek-L3*NW8N-E@#T!^Xj{814`+;ZhRvIB7YOC z7}`WqtUP@`87asr7|eN1?Gg#o(!rxvlbWHTGLm{rQENLW^bKm9RG;LC!Id)G4(9-3 znFODPhh+l*R$likNeoGHTOU#im>aw1mVT?wLE5|<+Kfz=?W1LS>o$KxyD5tCNvuRt+?MBqeXw=fFgp5GDH9xYY2AA4EggqJ;%djjWUuvwS}EFkjm!l3c$2< z!4ycUH(DXo8Kp9FZ)y}mv{9Y`S_kRFr8Bd?+4XJF!JRq1viV&f)Xv;lV4Bf&!4mdH zvOq$WY~T#A7^c~C9Sh`@sgf{Pg%tCIJr#~1KYbm~a5>_ZN#lQV>YVRh$jKX0R<~FN zkrwzHDHaH8R2RdsQr4YKwr$GI+f?klVs|&r(eub)Q2cSVZfiSaaU)*+E0F;=Y)k2@ z{Cvh?>{k};&M>^NVa7gWIe9V>q@dIo-mUD{X#v+0u*2g^9t!-2=ByypXmPHcOybH4 zn*l4C(;|mh#Z-SRY84Pr&Y-Hy?AlxM-CihG*Is3}D%#nk)O=6$-P|d;T+Yr)BElhP zAKX5A2QM@vO8}fobZ%&|h&ofg%wDHtDxl!ERF$eyB`7ma?KGtQPnKm`GB?*;B;4D# zGLT_PZ!AVssqoO0)IejhJc4wvOXkd$1w)NYrnF>bZ!CX>i0li*)U{w^_!$`O0d3jS z=qDYEa1kUOE^_<}YZ?qpT}1=$^M_`4Sr0m8yqdXAWvjvv6tKD6W<_TyYXEqp;zo~f zK0nI)EK`dv$6Q0FRer4%Xxb@RwGIEw(>`;_$ec1)5wej?HY9E4!eln55$&wel+5HH z_nod~Y`TBiecK&TNYuGuR!P*%68QRbC9X)va$9!e-?uWMYwOhq)4J}y9#6*IJkty5 zu2vs*4W)u!UaWrC|6%nzaq{~jm7uFH#Kvy*8S=su5yV_sB7^uoePq|wGFU#5S{nVA`)tO}3;R9-EyjbR(HNHUj+ z@a`zqc>hNqkLWgQx=Z|1K2hSYWBWvcMWCB`EepEu%EVXVG?jv^Quo#VQez2baWs_V z*aXP7P+j`+*E5PojJVRGVowWFF$K7In69X-4Ed28BKTQIM_JGe(0}}C3cJ#WNC{DQ z*xi3bUPI<=SY!Q8Ey6;CMB8jB^7fS2%!KbAQ_7n`vGYpyG4a8m=2(=7QI36zFoW_J zO6VtzIJoQnQzEx23Q9TBob4)wvgDdoW z=%s%o``Ej_X^Hs}WVjlkMPPVsm~@YW4pTREj(l`x*tyyLFmW&WQc-zvn51KuV~c2m zkW&J5x9OSLoW7V(%9yE$9ePmJvz8^AX1Y=4>TFa!_2z9502SuZ4##A7DAl}71*dAOIX?b zAf!Rf=b%vD&(J6mw`fE1ctUHe9e*>q_qX)`2>{hvQBF{V`#+~^IRP;Ho6u<0^w;S& zc35XT{H6pMZ3;9*`l*wI;?Ga&UrB$;C;G&r%fB zPrIq7TXdKGqbLxga5&@#0$vaAPD~~?X(~5{DSwOxffofbzI5--K4V4GHg|vAuwjum zQv}7%(^04Mhyz#Y7S$$jtw*Z!N23s;1mHXkic2YbEq1N3X{{s5W|ez}`#3Cz){IKI zZ7sLs0AE-|9zz=OF*T$B2Gop=w$b3X!RAPZIC|qGy<7JsKcU7e1cDQw#2)K|t zgvCu&0WmO0Fpw0p%O!}59T9)O{jk~rF32Oyk@69up<346;Os~p;FA-v$fBQp;W8B+ zB4+QAZp`)2-}J$pE_;H8S*){10=ZCIbUFfx<25xQn;lKUR;A_#wbG@H-wrCvy1%ih zi*!%5p7vbC+s`!H+(ubBd?V#k&Vp&aeFoR931)y`hTx%J7baVjjn04E!~)T#^Ig@O zX#{KQ=?5V(hn#cNyMvOwG;zho<02)@{3ZpvW+>CvUEIpqPcS1X^8AiXCuyD8d!~E0 zt`9sAb$k-vLgst|A0vF)&NO@Dl}gNehoxSCu@r+pMJ5$=qzYqOyUHrfDtttOT7fjC+H!&oNK1O%bL1whsl5ad}N)cFP8RIJG#bo zJOzt5|JZpZ`*W@WfE9F13;=*Ls@Q48pbcp`r2PIeCgx+lLVYnaJit1WBzE+0DJP9w z00V$%GO}}cU2nc_1~tZLUdS{<-m`=<07WRj5g^pM=XjUJhM->yR)m#8xhiO$9F-qX z*8b1{vDvd#L&1Ll(2F;bhR!!)UOH?CH+_(-jg-K(6hwOembiFPE@UE%&lKr1BY`T7 z%CdU9ov2{^Mh*?%AxPYvMrr#hMV0l?)L*yV)jemb46C=zF6D69ZqD1dG{+&tueqEY zoY$|@Kh(((Jf>Df&QYC>oaLl!B{RJmM}KyuB58V5D(`=l0%@vEuMmVt?pUHk>6YAd z4B-NmM+e>Dn1%QWye4ksowqi&gN{JT7WGWfOkle8W{rJye)9?_QVwm736cKIPq4Iq z-=@<)o#>yZQ*gHz5`&yNSxGPFrgDNg%JZYPOIdh2!hie8m(?9kC!6cOeNn9Im66hat7oaO-by7XQjZ2y3@ z(Di@VHXRMSfBG{QKPW^(8))J+#7b2gkqH`-o6JD zi&b(Ck7?*-803@kAEDelVoCnK2`kkMoik~il;j;eMOfVUC>xLy>}~!#n=IUdZUStU z0W*JlSG{=>)9#r8Q9DCs%swbZHSll8qK{%4fu1GFD~b>o(4JL3$z_pDHZBzEXi!Cb zNOdBO@z!(Eu&Qvr&1SmE{lI^G_UnpRrj!KBuMF&FHf^YPZ>II)XDJT7`WI=NfCbj8 z-h%7cjG7s{mTzzuw`ArGa|E{TbAqjXm0ExETM6)BC!Fe3P0^e{{`gSp zLs(^iiy6|!3e*G?ROLmJcO&&C8i<(K@y-1nm@}F}0nc5^(2?BeZ3C>_)vx}aOHQ*@nu+Oos5B+HOgr5Y^K`gE z^~Drhjx^~bBU{3xfIGazm3XL3aVPXnL$oc~X(UCd#56%Wp@zNAn_;ZNa8i`qM7e#B zO2hv0Ms$&Q?S}yk8|`pW_)8<>;6Q(RYqzq;!X7?b_LVU%QpP-Z&S=?#s?17dO(Y2^ zH{9@n%d3=XNt?8x(;#b?jPAm?=S8ZL3dTbZ$5rSUr*iS|g!j)5ov&)bJX65FMHT*c zE>>i~qddYJi<i`5OmY1BP^NG zG-b~*zWIb36*L!%Prl8?rZq6M!)DVr)*H;ib0yn7Ih=Tz+wqD zUgZ&^s39q@JAX{ng1DGl!z(;lqFd4R&b{tRjXg@R58=M_~`XBD>_}92QfA{un4~*MSUjONz-uuaWfBkNH`0KWRBF7JwFnzo3SkVtU zox}V|vT^BAO1I6M1L?^4hky7`BGRjGHwwKWzD0Ui-r6mNj{JXKlnWHJ+iV!2ZFaOy z#!R9iLx<-+X$FP!;WlT$io3Mz7{A_6!(RLc3p$wfSyi)U(Y$}U`l1#fMYNw2-m(UJ zS8i*9ydTXP1^0`2&{xw)b9MF_q${jxbuBHpX=proJz|s~Fs-3oPv+$o!J_Y&5AV;P z{`_5-&qt>u3e$PRN#B%E}MVu=o~ogVgi<((F%A4CUFzI z-F*6$sam8+J@%mKxo7hk7y~Q?80cHFfEI?B$aL|XviY{nRyTPNt=qhanJoNyVvESb z*6cS*Icv3~`6e52EO;0NZep9win5sW>%yR^bP);8>{jR2VDv1lF@n^X0`-iP87?Uz zkZhnKCVPKu@eZ=lHZ2QKr8R~qq$ajI@PtK5MaZf*q-v>#1U4=wu|cyV!xXbfE81;W zT}xy=$qf8Yw1-W1E3ja*9GIc#T|L@yFqK=)XCEtC$2I`x&-`RuFu&AsLxq*?X)0{j zZPr@0=yDo@HTu6gm+17w(ga~^haeYu{=uNy00@5!0J>xdu=a%n@FM-f(`@I|^ZN{t z{z)I3X=eBP=wGN_2@lX|qhKDBZW6&bGl&tRu4y=ebVWaB<04vjWmRv|oSNI$9s{vP z2zL|I8nqmM>}YJuYpI_Ulw)Qh4ktX|ZrWbaN$w2U)@n&cI^j~3vZUq7xmR;aMXD5$ z6bFAle3tFv&b~1xT#8`Q;AW>|$GPv-BU}>bCmUwpLU=(MZ9<76Swf-2GphFsA`3RN zks|ZfMu&OSH>Fn>yM-qEWCW1X*o#;O#{=+m$=!2=j_tK%F+~=K?EI7mCt9#%anE!k ztV}-Z+2L|Sx)VWOgf_RA)3C8&wMiBM(>i|^UOC{<3_DHNG0r^U>nhfL*flddtJA-v zao)|&@w^MnxztSGG2`9t>Dd*!!TC)))qFKqcqQn|5vZqMn5{88^50Ro)qosV?K1bw zOuC~!ZHgUH`dj)X<`d-HQAERrgVV6KT-h=|%RSAA6ZzIiL-F~k`_d8FnSo^q|NMVw zRptCbx7O7V7aDI_FYB=n++VZv#p&CNgNmLtkdYCQ$ePnr7C6FJL^>|gj~g>6mO)8S zJyH7T3{9kyrVS)3jOFig$*n8*ped>KhW!MXqg|bO{$bFwCr}~hc zTRB+FDXUngX^n2%PWcE_AU#~a`qunci(qZIK;p_&lrho=<>-R7V8jla2wAn-NMWSp z2f2SLR!q-(WzS%HzP#!6BD{YiWNH*VT^Xy;n_N!^MZT}#53uZEQYk~eY&xe5iKY~d zn9lL1%E86`fOMH3Mi$r_ZFM*!BjqV$-I|q?x_k^~T2kOIivG0;cbc1VmO7_GpUL8Q zc&t_hml)aZ7(h$?t9m)p=W{4(X0HR(5|J@($G9NVVVL=DP2Yl~Qqz zvs19e=E8pL>hl0q>=fw3u6wtKx}6EuD!SUAM14aM1og*~1E&(vwas<<9{iU8ItJyp zOxCz6)V&JRzm!IBltp>T!XRMD9Yo0-%UT(94Y#dAceNf#_0c682id!E1LF!D0@^@u zV3E;sIR1Z+Z8p0_gje6DvawbsZo5~_zpTeTm-g4OzI$(^_vDQ&Pm$|ZekP%1%!GE| zUJ4Atz90fUDjf$1q!t-+NlIL1&NA)r;3TDEB`Ip$rX@DSl$Fo^0HE)Y0>T||NV0cD zuAnrN6&bv{Pfw|6{F0F+87%P7h2TP0q_)ZUv0Hzuecs!~j$|{~aQYYOhnOOUJM6bL za2{grBz%3LJ9`DBm`AMS0={kc%*T8Hn3aAjql^nsnY-=uLWW`y@vZ!aVZuhkH!LxecwHejGi*C=s)X5Ro>1!xU)MIBgm(nOsOjWZLwC`o>CzPC6 zJZ^S%r{q)Ce+5Y3ZiGgFV(ILIHIv2yZko%qXVk%SnK=|uu8?_jWW{Y$z$h#0aA(>D z{c~^$<@N$DO}NEFf7>brgThX=G7Tp&M?!xeS!5s@B?fA%MOg)GMiUQ02%B{$45V*M z+mje_dMe#2MQRu|mni^6J=o}m9w=%834Zm@Ykt>M#ig?zE~VT0P(w5roYUzKCj$uJcH4T`>H#e?muACxBt;{%Sh;%jT_4XK(%^ry z_2Qy+tLnz>elIm=ttg?`2@Gnju4FfLRBdNAs9IK$(nxcuZ*Q9{m0}g$%`})wJ>eu5 z7E6RKYVf_8xPtwYP#np#Y+&Ea}5-exPfW3bsnT&cH^SbM4de_Bnm$hQhDda+~^8~2=evRZU zy|8JO_g)UJnuIqdFb$QKdV;1 z{^av&^{d~e|N7k*UwrmCJC0`fo)4LkT5LP%Bp1#gMu`oR(7Zn+ykVKJR|x`Sh|sZN z&x6B{Qpr4Du6*jF9?NQvYa!#`7Di%po5_Eract4Jdr9^;^9Ib~ap&Z$n6|P3wJ>zC39vq7J%!Xd?RW+h zSKUthJ0I}4dace%<4VK8QmggF8xs?<$G4&B7@(@o@VGSG`POUsZ!?xTS+DLGL@3MEDUH77w%WON@%Fd>GwAy+b5K30K&`VGd z>bZVLNuuq~OJU`;Sr$Kt=A#m>-J16>pY0jH6PBKD7-H^KX^k;E9pi90_P&D~Qlwh! z>*kQ(rb+H5cb}Nu}q%{Sw{jEJ?jAmzJ?0BqSP^hzCsj z1WfwaT$Y}eJXKd=1T4)JpGpdn50_r(Ia}{jNiZP7a5z`G3bkKy_)O^Rvwa4jx01F1#kicZ2?DJvUr=;JtlVen(xmr6eI){wA zZV_+1oPs^bg|H^lnDButDGU&=e z7p)1cos2=HBi2fQlOBV0ZuS-PF*h|+e;L|R+9-cPkK;TUexlD58?3(KAcmP8Yz`@5 zUa94+|88uc0U$Fq4H5nu_JN_}n&*wu=)BT(qh1z|jr#pmCM!3{BT~2{93^scxeObK z9Uzi<8VG_9FaQ%zEB8IdnNCc&vLpbx7emt(+@}c4oHfnEpWZCjm|^uS01-8BUX) zx*UH~t?3ZBa;}1WXSrd_0fA`i+Zj}?(p*Y+qNY)XfSc!y82@aI=b&gxH#y3sGV7Tl zQOXoUOZBt6kTug}1e`*%2+xkl_Qutkh%tM2gfbj&W42LAVV ztHt*!58o6ZIw{Sx=!SkNP(j)(u%LvlCOg&D3K2%#*do=yYE2Wz+`08=PB4_^ds=^ncPf9y899Da4LU~ES!2oQSaJ=Q98qqGeq|>F9WM3E zlpcI{CFh(mPBX$(Gaw=QZUW;}BU%atnc%AI&CjpwqFC>sp zh);zM=0;GJ;G&!nkj{ye&(ayuU#>on7xnyyxG0H|e`^lC_GB+>MN|)s8tQ*2_+e<% z`8)`gOZ}egNk;R6aJRH8uUFmN!6P=Yl>pZW&Af6l9p;eHHqfV-5A5P#ckCtn$$68m zRN8ZqJM@~HjHBtB@%LW~-9j$Bw%dR;woOO9HtwVoLUL`leAn5K5 zUKzoJy_RBhXo-^ptg@S>kB(`7FiQn0SMc=KXk!#?qgshZLI&LcAJ5sd+QwTF0lCsb z!N*t)f$df~TE%mfDK<{WhQe~n&X$Fn?Hpw*$-l}X0}C`IuDgkU60%DG1o|f-%PDar z3UY+Y+O(gu44txLWKw1Mu!^7S<8EWf9e+nO^?ub2z$vNn~Deq?smG>?*y(E~&q73Ki zz}Bn}7VNmu@!5YUKFJTvfc#RV%w#m_V4iXgHiLmw(P<9$24o}){e&q(em)l6__4n{RJM{U zU&oj|x!05xz4iEYTg(5AQqCVKdDBnyFyDpg!l8{gIY*W=Kk{}Vhprj~zXh_~R)gH?R&bpS6);!V+E7^k4E zQg#{ic-HUYonM!lN#C`Abl4sU1ea5%r+p75gopzcLMK#mmlR zf-qeo7Aakrs6eKO8tlh(_e~+}Sj-+ic(!br(h^LH~c7~_-Lhw?>XUc(l z{aLHr;4Y$Xj8@^5Yc}soi|S=p@3T&{vEv^BV@2gjG0CYX%lm+A?K~@1Sy`BJ2EI@( z6<1x(Cyvh7JjpmxuY}(f=f3BW!361Ob6$TnUSR0xM}n_I5=r|EwJy#IM1XV{FvOnDl`|gFznlhEVZ7Of_JDHDAgyJHe@q{5ijm) z1QZ>EH@I&Cx?lnv*^et_Zxjeo;S9`3TtR)|Hj(>;O$oCtSlb+!t!hQwQdZY+l?H#) zT}Zu`43Z-P5XBt;tTk$Jj`QIH4JxNn+nM1ECsD!lvU)MbT2j-_KkcIVz>k0FmCyG)k;Z=datfH~a_(VT#!9 z4nugcW)Meq@Wm1SZ1@nWsJ2GE&31oBc))ml>I92{fIN26dDPy(7dL#b^h)`r`!aJQ}p53;n#>wJotVNRB!R@KFW<| ziiuW(sx@r`jD8x-08jc%_G_gx%JtYZE&meYhG2lZBz-e1KgE_1$`XG`I*6H*cbXAP z(l6`1;3!j)pudf1R{1qxk3-Qwv8+^@G>a+R5eZ6W$5PJh>iz5xR#Aq&)lTY`L}3v2 zsyWhy`gfXpXr58xxX0Bq>JV<1se#swwr%H8gr?~ZmQ{f$Iz6La5g_3tDqv|rBI~1SW0%!(r+{2VJ@dR0V3W`m!6R8 zDXW!b;ke@_S5ncdEZilETulQ&dIISIs$6*Sr${4mCKSKnPjIij*%gEmZa$iJr> z2Z6G83jO7%j((HrJhSF^+^uZrdNVNf#B`9Hv# z&Tp?OF2a~P8k~SoUGi&!dvYaO|1(M92W)|7wqS6^3P(ejrP&b#d!BZfHMWkN5Jte6 zorxCswW<gdC)etELLpM9g{(AO8kpqBrV(qKDVr_9~;TLcyxQlS4!96n3q> z$P!`;g3>lHx$4DCRPUtz>AY=dtxoMQ95+DA{=k}mMT>xVaLB~0NKxU0@?s;q1gE{V zZAc^js@__Yd5?bJq3mbH)H@WEOOc+4d+>l<`BQ%=ERyE>-UX;e-z+yF&9l;kRLY%i zzMBu*vYsDXy2!lW!Nvkwp>T_BRMFN)E;wgyu~wDRO|T}GH!!ZM#g&du0pMKsTQ78j z{B2cYcToNah)?LWwf1V~(zW~x1qc*EVW8*lTed`YsyfAM&aNAdfF6==BWJX8Apm(Ao z370K%QgLUZ&<9$0t<#9f@);TmY2-O!Ct5eK&-pOu7o0m8zj&VeL10Y3D@KNmit`JFCI^rJ{Pnp z3cI!FTy|-Zs+11*%Tz@*2AQJg)68e0ul}W9u4U&s21;h`qnObTVWTm=WWT$DG%0`a z`Z)^dY_aQ~vO>Zb-vs09_7Gqmcm>DsX`R(u;PERKN-7?uc5IQ275(&gPPpoQy#W?(*VIFoN~3#S z^Sgn2p@38|?WL8Aj$D_2421=H3x=f&;N>T zUruX6$>EMA{JB|j%;*Ifm#U)tsuYFm#OOf|CItl@j>K$jyJBW8b;4+~=J-ZKzlOe@ zyw%?RRjGl!|EA0T7Q9e*$iFew%Ez8JGESYa(vDUDvfs}baH$4`&$ZJ2r|y3)v*w}; zqy4PzwJM9qnamRC=K7_2W71XAGTs4y%L2;}@Z&=V?WZZOO!7_?Jvk+8FE42w#;p+D zp}ZR5&=V<_L6DF6o9W^ikBuMaoVOn}qYPO#%>bo_bOO7jT3Um={?q@N9@wtL_Pzeo z|3wfId-!H`TpD>8|KzIPn}~m@BFR*U#gcA>uzWfpelTrUFuFNH@ts_mP<^Mq_nYC}hjwQ+h6m7x z&A(?#!Jkunm zup7U+oYH?qtWuV(ur9&`nv!%`(gw<{{H-YMb($2T)ihk?LB1SNGMLcp>7%WTdRGd4atpE2k9$cCSSMxq{ooz;A!jJFffw>uU8y`}G&{ z|Hc$(4x6Wxt)MVYA)*B*1e}T1i#~`)k=!lmZ`N9y(4EbDpcw2vUs`@Rv`kIMavoIl zuUKr4qMzz~ZO6}HQ6N^cQ64N1a~_1Wt7G33@B?`b~dz#j)b7 zg{e~cZ0{J9Nsp%`!vD6dSDb95Of}>BFRQs^*Iqa;Pn;3h>He?jBceer(wo?5=yy;k z;e&oy>U7@BQCb=~DIaZS-zff}?9)WI^}>*;a<=Vr}{lY(Nv` z)1TecQiY_WeJZqTCLx913T014(_m}50jUB|jd@d;{D^7&6_{VHa1BL>Swc2Wlv&e+ zUOJOwZi~->p*F8slY9D_x=r+q5pX>`8lC%z&(iVYtTRon_6T4@)2aO~+6(BB>(AEF zgGIo9Jgt&T%Z_9kT*ICPf%-I)yMaZnk6bu>tsP_*4xAZ^nv zPhmbHZMuyNmaZGCRU+(~8_KxD54bfx3_>9?Xz4vgb7O^O^?N~P^e^QB{0g%JDGz^U zf+K0YrqbS+qFU9mfHax8|3jFE&s(5vPicXD)@y&cE}4rVKg%-xo{=+M*3aLq3@^Bs zKHXO3T0<`=t*5V=$<#l5cop-uy97XL8vNF21r)M+#$=7$2%_47460)}eZ-Vlk+?>4 zD@8EbsWY%@Sbs+n2C`&~W%VMF2x^81Y`q2iXNbOlX9 zag~3{JrcI}_L#IlIyHS`_6AjO2yp=6O(p^3te^7O>As_z_EZC5!!p`{G|N%*A|;v= z)w$RG>3mgdNhX7>U1K7xhaRkF{9-3Z!JyTiqc{pc8i(_FVdsIm&3zEa%IRTT$r%c( z{5jY3JZbI~rv3Mu=D;Qmi*PQlnoEoHRjz+fu5h>9_S23YjBTcPNgGip*!CiEz1`@9 zxy(0b4{9`<0@mRj4IOJ*Es-Xsvmd#gJh@X@aw$V=ZiG=`oq4YIup@U{m5Sd&i4YQ& zJW?8(6so?NYQv<-Z*0776VQe9rRhr8+ldmr1|oCv$nQn-j)r&RT6QMgl?ANDDc_5;_2!WDp!gwAT3w1qIwxqAIJEr-L6j4 zsD5hFM0a3h;+=*q15%K^;<{;O1#={w=bKdFwCglqB>Oa{1kDTKS3Gv?Q`X_m!A17e zi2a$3_=CWyV_2kQzf>a10??vI(UO0QSke_pJa?5Ux5F~XRgi7~*+cUvjehI22}??2 zMiMF5@`T{l)w1f&C@&ptfHWX$zeLwu2Kx`6%{x8tf%I;=eGBNQ?ApMaTF?}?O>VFT zFO3XFmvP|H^DBL7Dh#9wh-rx|fUXx)U-O%UpiTr?>{>-8``$JA7{c$CzL|dk(1p*C z=+iQ9vY&-QQzHTOI;10OU^6FL5?(TfQ6Ot53iy!E@=W?ts`+wY!JBTo9VaKOkFu2- z@0lT1vIFZqlUI2JS9(_qX90u2uu;Pi*``M?wM2-C*_LXLyEwHzkGrClEsO#R)rjfP zb~q;b<9O>wSL_CxY*xHF^|*h~6$oMz91N~T@om}HrMj-=<#J3M@T)H$9}OqzIz!RX@J+=pBCw%W}EQyyCpq zqPqNiNL%lT#eSiNDDK+TZn4<3gF$Rb$FAhi?z5DuFyH+=Nt*6Oap zOJ|CR=viaxB2vkui_=8gFDJcZY(=Wg4=D|nL$A*1-{#->61Q5b)xcOPacl{_olvqWAWwc z^qvSZ-5If%BFxwb*y>SH1%;_TC2w(tQgvGkAlCW^Xvb{o?G&nqwv)3{)s9m6x@&*e&47+zUX2(NtD%BL znA`L>^uR6-{z`vM3g48QjN=3AygfHzS)~>OEWO)>0g(hwpW)`LN)LbGQ>u!j-u*y* zVq`4{9x7+yW1l8x!piSfkG4{mn!OFx2hHn3V!MxrMXBSv!*#ZHIC5BZXlpkn>Mvq7Gpd@tQkVP zn%e8WIEzzAWnOrPI0|QH8?RUWSfNx?nAFo`ZrzN*7 zo_Bdu=pQ%XX6%lblX^4n&vueawqp6STP#FdO0oN=BUl96AkEoDf$!I7%HVpBa7ouyU^E=aB zOGn<$%(Y^FsbeXcMa(gV%&{o(Ms=^E3s|5xWYXOllYPv<=W~yFZ75*+f|RLvn;9`x z#GA$a%mmN6qMIGL5ljQ7b-E&-6Tc2_vhyC8o&qw78JB~b61Sk|;E~FcETeSy<3t;D ziZF7gC}v8zWW3(-1zB>n8M8YjwxrbNGVH0%&Qb4w>|>XupGiZa8)?Ozi%RnEsZcC8 z`Gh(subguIol*TjQpC;5<=$Ss`VPGfL6-(w3$#xyLOfk9QC)`SBDzZgk_y26!|I*p z#gi}o&K(=Aebb12ZEH zgX@cy&K;rgCu1om^);UcoFQf4Ib;1C!%^)@X07l#3&h6i9c6q1y(7AR>9;%SqTNow zA42h3!?hGJDX_8c$9H@e34_eK8a!)*>m3Gv^v6-qF%U&9QpUaPc^yo7Y*0z0JEWDI zqfXVx8yv zxz@)jQv@78R~9R|dIv)CQwSv8Hg?tM|F;5`yI2W(pM%G-Ko;3pL}wr5(in;s1rY+ZLDHpcVg_bPg-NHS z8SYY;$PF0XuZWh0dR&UW(?4U%Fq>t6_gv_IoGY^jt`wSmkjSYFd(d*$4tagY{Fzru zN?!#r2rRK=m7i`lh!0D$U2S-Qd|jN#fO1ZJ=GDIoc{Sa|R;qxnrj$W{v?}ph zCTyFOlF8G37Zs3Oe#ktC+UabvY5JD(#CO8TgXejAU&^B2*d#gKMbNqcHk3qy1zbwE zNr=_Z;!Xi_%K#3?vqwIKMo)^UFF0D;G8t6Dl3~$@bn)r@xB@JHmktn*pI!&495;0t zQPeO*wzwc$RFw_sk?f z&n)$L5JJB6(Wr+^pVV#WVtemJn4sv;_^9;UW6R3cGH0aSa;`uaC1JF_X=3Gc`c|TmgnyaRV(SSYHhTSxNR7;YY9+k3wM9smyGS_+MGW!XiK96V%ato#OjQe2=}p94`qriB_mch!M0% z_N-#;ADaoo?IvGPipWmA>2GS~pfuSHmcpTfq&TbRf4^e#?W*437jK5?U@G|p z#j4+>@BjC5Tz~d5W%}tf9^b8&({o!x@}K?g*70$CkKcUw{L^56F81WhbRxbR*T!zv zOvy4sqo$|n*q6R|zIxT0^7SOt!yUz&BxR7~k01X0(~m!U_W8THw;38qE@2Z|nL%@p zKK6wBcY4paO~$z%th2lk4uv(7(^dr`6RpsqX$aRrIZt&?upEMkYA|ywhddp#7q87! z#7Cmidc>>RlpUM#Rcf8qedDhL=7e44U)rM&5G@N#%6tL0Sgs`(3ho^_nKxp zur?;0ajzb74(j*;4SxUYpP&Va2YG5(X7+!&BoWkI7@Jn{;Eq_&8V1?K8a)9q@3@j7e7ep?cq92e;d;zD#F+JU--Pos zsYJxeT3XL=GrX_c%VU>fGqtoCfL-|m>3QvXhxQZ1VXzh*u{(IfPc6?iO>C@z*XRc- za+yWh#@f6v#ah~MDKD38bjI>hm-8f*=Z8xy%Fo$b@ z*&F)dmtm)>FE-9$r^mb8swihj*-TDh0Vw=(fvX(V@nwApdZ=Ma1;0Wb_J=^!aRW&C(ujjjd+NSI~6%6Oh$KQGHC-42_-Rf<~hrj&WY_6TB+R{!i6+RW3 zmXv+KF-JnLV#Tt2N%?X)78{f~Y(MCKs^Q=M<17&4TGr{9jkXpx zefSYHCYR{OLMNasJ{{+)?k8MrT8VlJ2jQ9{D$r8xX}NmBA~TGvcivKlg5urvPM&@#GRr*wG8CnG`elq- z0GxLj!QBfFO63l;7pLKSp#`GrKygbaT)$Dxd9-t>7bj6hvYzq%E^v8zd}oDkEOOui zWYE$!6Vnnnv6z{m93<4TVN5x*L8^iN!-I7vj%Vnm6e12;v;>1nx&( z3pPOrS8nI`aBZvLeplfC#ehC!H7H zM`1HgLu8L$)mM}+ifxHPkKdfxuA6C~=8^)iKq%SEP$AmTvL}7p3MQyhy*)^>vAXrn zl$tHq=Jj5Wad>4Qzd?d-+Dc zZFN*QVR~~;awx$C>r89MZ&b3Z0L*X=vH=R(181fxMl%3IIF<%DGX=RaLY~?& zU@QEbTs%lzoq7>}SG9N`op%v#%NHh9GHW=ml>)y7Vb`aKd!Ot3#SxLN^q~5dkl=dQ zQT5zdkz*L4NqW7xZbDJWs!|qrYcEPiy+{Q%QPxXT%IGSJB zuy6YM%CA!3+F5^`YJg@PmFgA>9UBliEt=}h6fHv z(gD%p*k)7137X|>E8n0hQ@qeDl=O77^8-weLJG2aj_l&*wT_H)GE;Bo?uIVm_k#Ab z2>!j{gtlF!!dcn#(owfa9Fx$RU&r|hUbn+jrsCc(XpASI&17V za~K^xD*qb4=M(%7k&*Mka%uUcERh=j2a5uibI_2QyZj z5#D5fci35OM;g5^(^0>XvZb&DQra11O0+e|Y)Tn2dy4t!d`Sae!G>4=Iw^Ap67*nNwJ;Z|r_bi;Ux|iI-Lg5jMr)%$7^w?~i-OEfeGlH{zprzn8@2ZFGMOo0~X%(cX(EarDLmTl`{B2Y8MT>3? zd z_CDbXct}{8eU>ZPbm}#zpNE6F&bbYLK{4>8QLU3Ll&=6~q;o7UGNIyx%emXeSvZ((O?M?(e6&(c=~@ea(w(V{ zRd%vHsJDiuYPoR7yTC4dY(87H7cPH4<-Yc;vTDSJ^zEA!&}FDy+d z*4vsCuC(I>A0!F*6BrLnSw{(-wPp87Guh%}YB6wj>{9p5lyc}Mcntss9J~=#JVFOB z8Qp)(yxCh3AtDY0#n4`*#VTwYZa=c}cGKSN4RrhfjGv0aLD*0*OfTUGo5Dz~RYn+bR7H4E zl2~v}i}3NRW%CAuwo}3KId-8Nn*1`Np-G&;T zy)$sC(OZ-Kg?F=nGHd9)W6n=3gcU$^oovNN>=rW$69E^4)il zs5urj6yfp^*Cot zE&7nGH{~t^CJ&PAsqWf8Om{q}@9>1~Cv+j((b<_7*~CSZDiYMJ1 zGW(?X^L)I9v$t%E7K(j92j8GG04z+u!z}D}DJ733E!Tu&!+_g-JhIVFxYe^jAM?bJ z{GC$=oO)q11h^-w&5LW%PCe(6w2^n(?Na;L4rhASw7~Tt_i_=8a~q(?Sy-~gX6{b1 zu}RG0?9w|$4anSo>?7!$6+M}yulelVy4d@i9aok8L4kb3z6lNz!BxQjfOWsquQGp5 zI}t~EG|bOrUlR$F_q%?1(`&DB9@jUE{B~YN+18z+)yHWon&7&7Lc%-jLCo5GAoib!>Kfn z1|tz8;r}rt+rWw19iH*U9CP~$a~ z+c{oDR9|I(P}GusytnZX%8M31OGVjw>HxKr?}Vq_+OpF*-Slni_MK_i4fxR5@CHlaHPH^`?pW95+_9rsgWyf^eW7E^v((JL z^yD%5!fiuCJYn&lg~PLKNs(;W3Q*fP;hH7Q*uVPrtjyQ0=d0=Jyo7L;_G76N2D?oeHI->R8f;?vQ7A z_Q47_0np~uai|glr}~is)2r{Es0iU>d^R8X=G?DNQAIH>rq%3fTBB)#J|fb9!?cxv zB^@{6Y1BdBRcEj5l^}~(X-i$}D?WTi@*IUUp( z@CLIPev4Cgg8=W&yKud@lyK7ZUcDyL>X5<2!V{fUuyt>PQH&dMV=5BOEl_HE>yv1I z4IxyhDM+2y0BO1fr0#;a?4egL1a%GvzQaPl>Cdfxi5H75^gyeP&1M>{0P@s+>xivUGYlp`ts` zO*Gtn_1!lVVrl6AXQZ3I{LhOBAL|T%(9KRsJ-WhIKy10ONfor^1S&1JTY54BGqj=c z=4qq_c~fQY7V@!`AC`$MAB_2^8LP8lm6Ku`f?pr;@^Ual@afu!p%K-%#hhk0M`z94 zPjfrDls}0z1hljL{5A#R4ssR!l}zo_X{J%=qCrnZA6H8h9qU&1Gt6#iMFqou8~g$c zB*3Q_7PIT5D;6n~B`cF2h4n4kaEi;Z9ov{vf#QNq_MvmQk2sIgGKFGf^#J3Lk75|m z=#ig)rxjs(62p*fA^D?Ia@uA{*~*$vL93c`&c_c9KOl;0*TNF`fzyR_)}|f$;2#^S z$b04WpcLq_ik27`2ydz)_O%(C-z@ zXshRv_VCK#Vjk$t66_Qe(G*$g&}%yd8#?9u+6r8~r##Bt?Wq=Q%J6;HrWZym>!x(BK zTYKb<^y}HN`qqw|p6m0R1owdJ-cbQhSD%rU6_~?%^v}&-yyvTu&kv!As2763F zt;sAROnD40TIsa2F7*qRr6NFexz*(r)myXmD9I;JnfDl3djW`lX{oK@W;RDn_&6yI zM|P)2UDuj{U0{u-A42ke2;i>DqZL2 z@hUx#SN}4ZH*d3R=!z3jnP|`Lgr;QEaUOSC?A1`WkaxVETG!Ql?BhTN;Melx_h^C2 z)SN}BoTa|(%c($rnGkIuW&f9di-M@~gFjb})N<;_97_i+X8~3ci&k`&Ol!RvL#bQ3 zrsFp7JbBbh=)wDi78OAh(^?Uc6+n%&b2r|D(AdyE>f z`zXNt4&U#8q+0-(`~C*-LwVo5M60t}wAJdppZw&%z@xsznHB*GpLm+DWPJwWfPkLSc9ylL)wg8>Tfs+$j6Si5nW;(+g_#GdGwyC}y(=n`l3kshDaoH-zlb0gQvMt=d&RT`f^uF^#XZ_vPE%uv~42*a`_2%C`7X zs{HR09;hDP=dnPuoPfjjfUcwRe}53aqZ!PoF@@HEQwv#5cvL!|Rs@=f5NQfyY$G%c zuHburUuTN%yns^2VE(dsq3IU$nmq)kHHTR~p{&3#Qeiouh)jJ;FGgYm`VXj3KB7aB z`fMBko8t7!Eav9wKr5bcm+elWu4y62K>k{pbRgzc^Y;ULhB`pPSSBd7sHaX?9UyLs z_}^J;<8*ypm6Sf`^EIl=^U-(nbazg*NNMMPZr4P?Exb(k_YtStirpHKyd=q3Rq`g5 z)&I5L0GIUpy4xtn=|nN>R3KkFC!ywYB_-jE2lGx!D*pQ2YVmy~Tcv~`zts^7mORrj z5$VT{_P@3c!_>8I6Os+9eUIK5zG;eumOQqh=}^GXEL%*LN-V2)q$g85Auwy5%PmBI z-^B>}o_(zAuCtW3T1ACMNkvllngroAEZ8S@@qp11ISe<}-~E27kHrTHGc_ZI6xzu)+BFBxR(y@@y) zK!Lp>9(&sui%z9|m?nGUUP@WXAg!0z>|x6)58Mq6U#zUdIf~Y-ya{}Uu^Pr{t-Lb% zg^H5lK~w3lBMg^QWteU2OhY&w{Xrix`?QZ~3 z=U8`(5KBX$VEf4&OvS;eF0SqBS=iQ0Uum@cj!wvwV^ZiU$3#258>N0M1?00pmkc6! z_4;lAg|_G-0ciDf_3BT5Sw4Ls=_j~bHWx#RGOkSEV6GUDHTd&O=nP|`{6$|syeiK| zGQ^P}$Qj*`hWFM9(}96T0|Lue^pv$D1+*WOzHD{$Ab0vqWf#NB%r41pRusLfY&r^Q z2oC$)yv_qpp6$OrE{mJ>chj+ou|@hnbpTL+GivaHs)Xofj(!(^c?lHNx0@llQvx5o zrD`}R-?umpQLFIU*o#Erk3d(3xqxWFr<%Rb78{xVgGBLZH;N#G$4;ZN6mnEL%)+2t zQ{dXu4d8?`F0k6qsT+RNPbrJu9Znhxe4b8?Mv(T9YP(4r<}8}yPyhD6NDY(0E)-dr zi%BxlsD&)*`eIdoZnBxM7Hu}ucN&#&u!{j#6V>91v2UE3M4|GY0LZHB*5>o^@m;5ZH4?I2Zh z$ZpbZ>WN`^Ckz@M&Nz|lVT+}5Q5ak7qGvZSKJLk9~HyQCy8aC0i_kuriyF5}^*D#>p6SB{p^E5x*8H2lWk2 z<+qj+s(o&Sf+%R zGw0IuXx>-h;CgcekwryV!kbSVw5tr~dCT9g(v>h~7pk@5>6a-J#QR?3qxVHWP%@Ve zTwZ;D_oVFPc-Oq5Ikz1<&54+VS!eo;=Qui_;pyt{Qub>*$+K$Kbw>o>_^b)Qv6{`* z9?F?fh9O$No_`BmUij-f1!D6X*skD+NayT)3xo$}gEj6{CiozeU(gxT1qBzjPq2*IIe+i*zCZe=|Nx7()As~1A%XqMb8bW_3xZcxoN;!LI4*)d$Sb`;)WnXNqrs zO{Laz^j*%!Gl@;}d+%~*EWE+w)XCb$rFdrHoyoN@8WK3{?^9wn2IVg8QlDwbtJatK zZk>Kn?qYsV)2%mM658e#hfckqd;522W8lsi7I5v5pPu^_E|lM9baeYy*YD@Ui>IqE z%fB~W7o!10c)xiaLPSoT2HP0kBo^0yDz7XIg~@U4Sre%BuuW~^+jcNPlOI8}@E+Zp zIv_Ck$c8f}woQs~HJ@Tsq;2Hh0_#^{K|3kZM^7I6V}}!}ZGtar2Fs#(TBNlAzuN;ysOiCWP-Jo-aERqeCMf^cc#F9XJ+kG zW=h)BG$l3n_U0`+#Q2)rB`0jyJLlOyj3DGOn3eiVnO!UgF=qE}J?$Xnxnj|xtv$L} zH9-`@P!6t4+Fr$d`=I8X(!G%OohqNAY}oIuKUC(OY}#PvxN$=ZBT?M>%GMzpQO*ZJ zEu^!xX{yYk<5sfsl&g{VKl2rTDqm{1)!r}Ts?a$UIL&luS*v2uRVXzT?Y^RCrcwx@ zZKkK{rABOdtTL8mO*)6Osb6@A2x#x72gY4Q#ZH5@QFjk**aK1Iu9Kl}a)dSG5{$-| z36hbOzbLEj&YL%aUoBCMQArteo*%U z6SU1lC42O_QFGt`q-gxxz$#T9u9ij$PP394^J+iS(2}-%?!(W;1$;y4@Ap#X=wv^S z5RE$$M({x`T_r;Yd$nQ!@;F9e1chjOdZWXWID);b=1xL3AzMs>vvewxjPZcB$PM}h z$JKRnn@4TiOHsz`%2N-2?s7g;(>J<9({0tzQbW zzkyL()c&HkBW)*+MC6okA<@bwb8gg_H*H7?PxL*qY)nsy3^+M|BQbKvWm??Nx#M(3 z5Gce+dMyz|bInbSqA@B%IJTYx@%R@kZ)HDCwc5e#@P>7JfZ{HH zZKg2Fw_iW3ReZ32YAK#~#WTz8RB-dMuZK}e+yt*s2}2A)#Lx__w@EbY!$5=74L83W(c0_hACkBFda zP)3W>Mvj#XKWoavXjutKI@cb{{>pRlLY3wej(;nv7Uow4P^#uN@W-ZZqJeSoHp!_ z61JP~*_U3goU$6|o(A4pFqE6+TaqbVHtFlK6%E5ZZNKO%MU7l5VO8#3ZOE|xmIe5&E$KpX z@_TO3-!-YC@2-Bv4cbk6UCX=MoxS8e|J{e%;%9#q{@|@!`wtguyv=&CKYsr7ub=)L zTk(rQuom1Z>DlbpqDfRcgbVlT4I40iz#F80H124A-1Cj!UQt}wC|660HzH{6cg@|j zeS_BI-M6-iT+K%g-5>5&m$lB4>$QMGsW>iqXscwpoiz)_Nx-Kn)-x7VlRPTd`@0fx zp0sc(4!EfSO-1)CkhQO`=)qA(mM{{sVFRDVuE+#6Ymz zNEJkNBs2Xmu;Nv@FdRJ+zp_^4JW}FDHU=Q2Gq$KP=3bp;0p#A#o`8JZq1n;BzKx99 zZ6g&=NyNNqcY?oT_pTR>5cz}me)5xlzpYRoscbTunxo^!SGe)pHF8mw8Fw-1fn zjn7{SO-k;@84U>%H*R))+fd!usyMNy-Sz8Q`>{ej+KOGRj<5sJZfr!fM^-j}+a(y} z6eD@ik5!PXqaap&b2Gh!p$rE>d(p3#_m^kfXQy1P-B1jHnzb1zKrb+vN3VpQm)lB` zhOwDbX-4H7DKgzwSFm9UPG0un0^YI}mP)%ORY?jRnK^@xE(;rIg7!wC#-@@p&LD(L zUXWHO#7PYNBs8Mvk<>`URMH)PmZ30u>}p7#9u*jIr+ZRMkT}Z{dl7g<=w)|knQ4_; zY;1hgtrh>WWK()2dgt9H)fIM|A|i6EW@}o&*V5mrN^FEiuJrQjdYxAEwo!fgP6mFK zx*az2)J_Z*QuHIU4~+_=@bLH7FV{o6%^Bl(b4@~{(0*E_cXZ@<2SVY0ypds;JQl9ZYg^iw5*tZb8d>UOSR2}+5cw~?$d~$| zwRt)dh&a-DLMx*v>P3}<+`+Ur7UA#`hXGKIEOUNaUH=B4G;cCRBWkhD{v|roM>?3L zQ-of3It$Tvkq!so#y8h}NBk=yhn|xM7dcL`wKFm3Zj{$lN6_Pcsh*RVf^X}*1jaPB zvHq$5I=J$zCFVTSXCS!U5l64ea3GxzMSfxLDNV-Hnp z!-JDKVhRB%kFxvZ$`g=LMArddJBjJLU>WiF>kM+@eN{4Q9Rz5;H zC=)qI5L1qR^?PaY^e<)W{wn>^2&&Z2-mT_D-)Pm#v_4}jplgi%7{x{Bxakz4d5(Em z-mm3h=mO2CYK9{1CNXvvfr1d?*64UHyoUXm(la4irN8NatvkID&G@XDZ+L_BC2()x z3O8m{_Kbq!lCtw}2ix!wvp>%sl@6!4N4ATvY;acgeGFFNeu~9V!UA=3AkT~8+cZC* zX_w>uvFeJ4;)v($-p#JBLtKgqADG{KxkmEQplgBLmy~*?3!*~P#_r!K@kzhC!ynG7 zex!8S6&ezMmS9E#Uye(+&76N~x7gDswOa-t{n8i1MaI5ce>_#~viTfD@neFBevs0l z&eWCe1R~N&)BCs%y*jOR?V5L|Khf&MkKXrCz>)gkEW4SrpdqC;Q}$QC=Rtc51!?44 zGI*B}i$r{~Q;Ad#4#C*^ySlq#QIC8jr5j+kBQNoPVLY>!dZ5XaU|0|I5@prs9eJPo$APN_HM~dFg#bSyL1FnjYNFeJhby1#BP6P_WTmakR(s6XC)gI~U zm7U|yB~?^Uye5!&%Ue7bef7tVu%EY-`qBhI+sa3O8qQY!g{2F4@nPYE{1$OAO<{zI6$Fo( z7uU65jBgtX+_7O=L#DkG3n(kpqzIT=c2aaTc0rs0Yj?hV^p zN#p5YokDMu$vhcQgX8(nqT(D78LV2%w0F8_hqi{S>ejxJ4+@&8MP@C3H!vMkZb8y`lPMV<Ouh{#jNsB)zJ*bd){t|5aUwfq zhPf(gR$m}Ri#(n8*M0lqen5xEZy`LwdMcH^qzAjdk%Klx-|K!$S(+41rW*ZJPazc3 zAe=887v=Nk?lyV{z5V#0f*GhbeM_JdJ`O|1oe}HWO;gyhz4{**P^jl{e}fjf@mPP~ zZm#QLyZYj~Ryn5UDP*rcpHdQk(X?ikDfOJs@ZtctMa7iC>45e~pbpsO~yWh-G-3(^#{$4rrtdyMP)09%xEKhr(@56^2N#yp&P*dCt@6X2>g!DQoZ6wi5_*|p<5Ij@BL@HF z&(Y(9{lsn2Pc-{DnT{%_SV1ean$hs&T?H7L-N6d1Gmhfv>eG&Y2AT);(@NL$MY`Pp zwV?|j^Teleg`d)>qS0et-$5`mJJ3%~Qe6st_xr}R6#Uag9wuNBM_eD``$xsv%&deN zJC?7iZ3<0Dy!4d*f0@oH*kqgrpF+6ATiP1qXi9V=+x0< zWK?aKt}fYiVM|#%h$jfkwN=k`40O}h>lKykI`Z3$rv@yvXgQno;$05XDOrHy!o&MakZl_o zVZU5`IM@W{oMaQpGtLht&zz9CLUj82x3yTl;>3^!p?z`B8&6CBWDat80{61^&=}5< z=fu$p_CH18`ds^WvlemIQVCj?LWJ0>HheiMKQ^zVVU{W(W4POS_nO2D*Mlq?emtwG z%AzmlUSPL>eliY(?=Z5@&89@O>**39*hD?F!Z^n}>=6Ofe z|HG7DtCvG5-Rm8oz|AOmeBl^4F?Ty=g#w3FH7UO%%`=wH0tOCK4E z4&PDrf^&Z}7RG|-2dWLUZcAC=Cwvhkvb)`x6|n9N_wq0cp3`tnK}hA^2`oSx#r9=O zS#Q*T+%>ZJrO;v5!-FE2;GcL(Ncg_2mA9|E`XF0@Zsd6?>Di}q1@gp$D*TU-S>HjB z$SIm)kY0VK2Lkde(;&2#xJ@N;`v+&0os~q0SZjZYCOKs9HZ6AdZcmU|uepxjnyK6v zE{qKm{~=VhQqtL0E2^u#(XjoOv;$*xtiJ1iQ$Z0>=Z9<=RkqmbRUzDtAj>g@C{}t& zk3owB7isi5;^@sl*G<2jyQbj)-SwMEqL~XT*i*6YX<%xewl&@`h;-7*IT5a&=o@+P z`Pc~;86mbWfrQOJYojDGr>cD zd5&b*EAflJ6aF{Gy@a{cKsl=ez{HJ^Q*v#v4{ zPrthNS%Ufy1!vv-Hi%*gJXN>u4MU31>#D-OFx|k*rrECR&DXR_5jbUsn=XST_1{y> z;I;-CSQ%cYR9Goj+>}I_Gh)8oj1w+@B;U~==2}Aeo@YJ;Wh#to5a|tuAZ@9qkdac+ zD~n6P^LFzxr61`b7_XHG-r!ceS9szH-@NqTmS*WWEA*87*q|zY#y;=`K!}+Di(|9u z{}e%1JTLCYenJ6t#Jw;~dnH>-$whR#3U+4-c?%ugAk}fomXloJayp!U?HuTB zq1kL)5sK}&;fLh3p=hDAD)(-nRFrbN;9%uiR3t23r=>dfH`nQ(@1&rqx)&eZUNzmz z)yMtN|FOS4-CVU_eO{+W^ucX2ygXdD-Bq=Eo;JkStKT*EY%NKv4DkK=FfZV_ef*L6 znOS*zr5#U+RKpz18o0HX<9*(L+L3_Pi%xRYM_WKp>I>#3U@2iN{)RaJzB6@$@HZ(J zovcfl#n69QKJ0oer5c`htW9C}V+9+GyewY_)-6bD_$}C5n_>n_GDO2;Z|`SPQO%DM z3M!o?kEVE_IhORzfS|M5Nk_{9Etn#qBr1mb^Q58D4JKn-+g@H`DQ!=MWt85MY@(A1BhG4iS;U&7 zQ3V7xN*4p>(u`8_rxlV^#)qHVpaiGbAIBL6u5EBXF@=GAKlSzzryLIMP#O7Q5E5f^ zC{X+@^{{PW73&0d{d(%B(OD&%UBAef!2{KENh0j@E{SmpkTGX{5%TkVkfOwXZ-3<8gPkliau{Dmz-caP0SbJpE zFnr2R)$_9i@l!{Cyh)e%eMruf^7U>YnT|HUDVXLwi2e9*4oFN~LeJCfp-Hlti%V!C zCJTxR@EUvc{O5nyw>7)E3(*MqJ6Agt{6BP)_Lyw~)2njckMA)HR;;T^@(5pu_JG-S zJpN`VgzkT*s7$8yN+wt{E;Ae>f<0Y*LIJxd6v>U8?igo(1hoZd3e>GAU=wvP-)TJF zNzvG~E65a3xLY2N5KAWN@}l6@Q|aAO+PnPxJ(}W;etbqL&IXi08apb@2lXYVs~I7q z{G609r|P@ybVPf?whIPy=VM}Zlc;_=WZ%ERiGIxfReKJm7%VM-a=plQ_;M}7<7fN& zj}jDrlRk5Q-S=Pr)yK`Du2#S8dt}jHv|oSGf1O^|4(o2MvM-Rj&4XpdSka;n5PPAp zy!vj_bX{wf-ul6=x6~9^<*=$v(o1dnjL#F!)k@FPRK*MO#AJ{UbIl1OX6mJ?j7Dc= zL)MgNvX|NHP@(nsQhDW(gGAKRR*`DJ;Wn*?!#mG^8O^)(fGXuc!oV_%WCuxJvbzhx znWHncD$lM@IjmHW{Jf<8{j96(7f2-PVLI~yHv*RUA+8OZcAR#`DqA?h&E zNJdtNbw>QC>O}l0AtQ79ty$tvp0@eyqi#+VD?L@}DlK zk#0L_iqR$jGAVnPi-2)DMt{`H77=iQSN#;^N1U z8%920nb4cG@^)y7p{9yNK3%=~Q^8c*_LdWELDDg zP!*F6;4@VnKpP|{n@=N)RGhWd{?6DvtC9vWLK4yzH_$(=Bx2dW3 zLcA30xm$cn^Lita0h3L>iLqDRdR!U=21R9UN}DdN(E*SI$Zz!f{1O8oJC_MZoKP%> z_NwiS9dA`ARk=0MFyyn!G2LiE*(rFqyf?%Pf0fRJ>;zBg1^ah&T`ar*yV~4;sI!2g zLcejM~-@br8gHG!e0}p*PJq+Mt^( z0-Md{>tbT*4Jr)U@_h2bMj=@;kp-?hO$3OYgsJy^c2df#@ULc*-EyPppT0IJMK7Gf zTa*#Xfjz6j0`SofqPcK?&=~w6#e``uC=iF}*m&EmSS*Rpkndo)wQLE=`*_kJyc>;Hg)*tF&%07J4hJu-u*^cS}#^#pt_en zp6sgXs|ve%k-#-^hu8wDMTwcE^BY?7Ax$Z7jf+qpbaP$1t1q( z^p~g+qrUCS+1s1*IkP|0fipnx}3S+;l$LaFs&G-#;e!ze<1#r#_F(f)=8jx~5 z$>lPMlK(;}%>SgP_z&gFdsKcSm!7y=`7X%$9S#)hlZk+zkSQe^jSb1ETR64~28UFsEOEZl23~W#G2ng94?Lj4q&U!+nhm?mJ(L zT36e+KfM2fc4yxmID(}u>D@H6tfW}@j~DZ!v{t0Q+wL*?>)LRw_7i3|+y`+g9UG4Z zL1rH2BzxKnG{HX?MP1WPrjMH!@=$ZWXSV2W&B)6xCF4yWf46U?2K4)r@$5l0zJ$d- zJlpiq*%O+7fJ*)Cj-X$!(zh-2K_C;#p5Z}NR;7gRui@cC3uSnGRVuz2jp<4|FIa@N zoXpG7FU$0l*nHH}?1A?@@#sGk#ZB((DS;>BrE>Cc##N*T5;FAcuEh$Jy9=4`GVOwN$fj5&u}Geg7?f+8C#NoRXdw|Z+siG>0LSJucn@XV)~lY%ro>Da9Wk@b zy0|%0S6=P7_Y98Z?qdg`rC7MT6q>u82^9r-=t z63;iHjH#k!%Q-dvhr2>6I|{R-uiXwoi?2h26xLR^=8#?ppU*mWFk2oDdYd7%ANAlf z`!{q{f6rpPdUs|k7SWQt%PBRM{*LYicGht8W0%8eO28}1Umpo?N)lfg>`Z1t9oSMK zuKNQ5eivsskf%R2Eb~n-IcQ7$Q1*@FUeLa$V340hRVMaFyC;sJ&tT4AwW2`HW-)LQ zZbpselAc+%oG6u+>)U37j6^Wl1SV!{)E`02e>*kjI494M8|fPN5nraftZAk;r8o=V z$5ctXYjOIYI=YB+Fky`;$te%pA2^LusVwKXxisB0tQ%EMSsN4doJjBqjUE*zfwFs^ zJ~pd&R1f-ptM@nWy9CooU+j}}*NQ4Pw=)aB!dNKOy|*Dy(+kWX5so1<#p8&IS^I3~ zf3#7cD?pFa`q1tIQ89eTINhX6l@2{QlxKzX505m4Aq68z7wre}eNOl?vdOM2)h@Vc z=R8PZw(E2rO@Q?_%R*jr(OYr(@Y zz>t}+=dRkLD&(pQ#Zd;*JBI$fihZ6G<0-BQMWU9w9&f0_EL z$^KdIP=~Ym*kpfU$=y-&`^f&dFDvogi41%1qC7pL8ktb5{D^Z%CjE=!IaSDNsv zz`#;79I;&e&ke~8pb*1Jd`5*ejH1QZvra#nhWUi~}SY?{?=HvdLD z?U*(%!Y3I&-*=At@c^=z6)0x1tj*fgtV|>jh;ToCF5e~V{S@^wm)nvbM0(JjTKV4t zi!Du4rF<(eT~(dV2w0BgJwMaWO>oWS=?%XrZi@sl9o>oZo47eG)x~niebKwJ7=4}IOOF{83aif?yWdKo-$V-8(|<#hX|63)Y6H;5($r=xUt$9;D!A&%>yqG| za@Mt%M~!^wz0EdYeuC{yuO&3YnMG{kXhh2B>yA%(j z+okzyvy)^)Zq>Ed1r(m~(mM9%l+fEFX(%V|J>jDSagy>p->S_N7*q~S;f=HmO?I&9 zH&n?-GRO9QGAy!8M&qIL%{0J#HimfU%`7>c+L`Ho4SS=gf6mkoEZpd>px<$E2`09h zOh@3ZPBZ7$HmYwegjZP%W(=1d(Esg(CHpjfKtB|a4fIWlrHp)lsN~ zHXOH|)2$Za?2;SBb~t&;uc5a1L+);DWXT-xC{d*if8K9;ke>3ED5Cu=#f;2F^ za$cgUE^}S)aNNL^`WN&RHxn38s(E1KA|STu99dH<4|S*MSLWrIh^}riEClGarscN0 z2qefTf56g?+lrp7(*09p8Gw7?P{KZqi%g9ZrxX_5u?mB>D~F&7K>9nB<+!m&ppJwx zYmXXvC6dYLjFZPQ@qU+?y)vM>iQ+*B=c^yreEIj`7F=ELT0M)1uW;h2q*TsJC~vDS z)83^>ZPSePt@mHHKvnzue@Y6e(~azz`-Xb@e>Bn#LOq~ZRSI=vn!!-z`eq*I{y07^ z1dZXehPD7Kq5G;yu$hgvyQmF{6hpEJ^NWo7uDPKms?>g-k1)y4(x8i|vK&hX_jdA) z!YvTzc_oRg^;gPr-g^Q`x4Yw%Lmb+SgOzdk2tB<#IG$o-p2p%30x4W~K7pDFdIoEY zf5n)}vTe?!G+j{8%J=SZ>-lHy{`Qe1Aq0g9~`t7E7`RuGBilL=f&XwLV8b3_B|1W9*7> zVp-h6KpZGkxexz&h30D4ZscrGg$B)%e{;dl3Dt-ZA~FfcK=m4B(p{0&7aogakdn+K zi>yM2(u7ZnNyXt4aC;i7a4`chx@SIfm~(MayGbNzD{e|&_l zyaUUKP=W-F>`P)g#ri$mZYdEd_dGXD2Z$@p(AcNM!B@|-zmhirb+ z$fza9KA|?9@5^GCWzH7=(XNH)r8cLfKOpRKnEQs}=ri@Eq^$VWl{C{BSS5Q>rYs9`h!(FT-nGf0Iy;%ji3^x+?^0U0lr3psW--7x zl%W#%vlP&xlRW*B4_y#E4WW;$RZJc&nQhA45oZgu)1vCzni$GiYL%Z&kxoj^q}KF^0Zb?dEy$dkf4!wRM{C7zGBT@V zxsj#o0=*iX#NP?q;A7naDqMHrad)08EAlZ_U1!{4YasNobhQ2` z8_baTbkYs1-X=Vte}fg2nYs|$9-cJppt?lBniZrQKVf8)wdHh5XYQFNayM>dBHvGz zD4O717vjTIw0=II!j?Z;yj^LXY}=pZ;LOq9igovNYVx+YDtf6kM1<>B=Q{h|F-=(l z5E4!=34v+8ns?7skWr%48c%9lZD2aWwpJnARn49RFjaJ$f6{63`xHp~b!6p(O#Xc{ z9~yj9oFK#Q=x}c}n88Jc&ZV`4<1wHWs!DC9o2(WS?u*&kq}@TaE6%%w#cn4)!DE+I zYKBTpUnqRurlr_!E=575hs9bXo5Ri7h1-wmOB_0)i>q8!)oxJ>qRF&Tvf65{a8gR) zvNCwmk9fU9f5=c<4)Uyaf(NC3)~uUx`OepMU8?kTGF;XPS*T&gjx;OJ?O=WWR_ycF z>>z|JB()Elb}OjW5D+dn;X7NGfbfGCqXPzc!f>#Xeh}6%UW7?|9cK(-(k=g)L*cy-r?c zA{{YFf5;}8M*gSYm&vK)$H}diHEoQ720 zhck)Pw(^4gxpCvbP~PX#6;KU2JYW_Vs4D?5D=^1kSJuzuWlSvI1yE94U6m`V)P8Y2 zHk-4jS7W{SRne#m<(#~eFjUodk6$6j;bwd5e-teFoc`n&{q^dqeIqgWy(jN}@Ceyw zUl3Ag@PhQ+<3>Rl2%%_sLeEY-kP^&ZH=u8KU!!Qny{M*^bp!A8vO& z6heNrM+z!$Aq!+aZ!pi8;Dw?dWf%sxJR@jKVCkUe&Nj zf9hMBN9}N`N9T)}=09}!@JgwE=&G>`(5*zJ1bZUPg)SXGI`yMCtX?j4mO@~!-Na!|rv9?sy(A{7th z5LX<5qo>uRo~4y}f-uLKBo~UiebE{m;Sp{3=zyUbMP zWD#$2P%i%9jly#jDrr@dep##wf62kg?#UF)ugK^ zYXCSFSG6JGEY?yDu9C1pB^#OPbTF}+@ik#TgwLAT0_%OXbb!DRGW7IUvF)Bb#G+hn zN?zQU^6ohU#Nk8+cQJKzG4T_gDm(O^FUrM4d&0}V>tkbE=f|93=w6oKf6un0iGXjF zRj?_;5`V$odR~eiFlN0Az(Ki&g%;jaKo+xh^x~3}k4y+#&*1E|$$;V~?0XZ-rmAoh z+)C`z5q5u(YZ}p_1`y3l^m-iX#X(g3Uzf6+2+Ukz1V|p~W46RQoTF+_vYm%{%zu`ejHnDO@QJGHs!}(__M#H4Hc&g_e-W~gb|pr>;|q2` zwBk{59G8q}z4mzV$tV@J!S{zE+P^X}HS-2S)RB15pQM{~7@R+eH+`t9ZP?TgZ}@zA zsd>Wox4awlGaDI6n>VB@;RtF5>-|deyy%8&ac~L?Yxa?-DjTj(AC1nD-@~eKL1v%9 z=)~)wn_?ZZob|N+e`qR6wD!LfZ^6nHgyJ;2R0;vknsEEh90T(+PS@uh3<$K&yb;P@ zsEebD(iS;c#q6e!)FeC2B2szU2tBE~6?$S_+}3T=QXVx!28BKbNIXR>knK8Vt|#n= zI&Z?w!Zb(F(TSGdw;g3TpotNoHb_Rzo^|``(^L+QgGvsrf78rO9y;WHS^XF)E>laa zJ#Nl70_WC+Zxg!p_=i3cq+Fp5Fqu@^y;5VBS@=T3&z=(Pp1BEy9aYjk)_TlWd3jG( zYz-Z8eS6W-)}TkuGEbgZSV8nXj4*-G1+V$vbIAc*J4WzesA4-!`0?X8dk3A`A^bHA zVE9itXlwmvf2eQ;@KiaCU+bEk^vGuIp;K3|L9W2*s(PRAIFya>SRjCA$-}&MZuqRL zP+FDg#)U<->Bcvr_3tGiZ|j{Dse?BQBna);%c?g04#3;PQPJJ)Q2IH_Zmy{3Ezk+- zvN;SG?n!1)z)`7qp)&q1bD@8-cKIM#&Tzafo|hJue{;10^ERrsN>rZlo!@FdkO$gS z(y^){RXDW|6Kxl&O(6@;Ded#NmFZS|;}9e=4%R8QYBBCmQLawQqPfMQ5OSgQEEQ|m zi^SkTN(zmMzHM$bN8>DF*_yhj$la$3N7ZGr%%wsV!XMG&d^uC=D{MLi7xiVYpqpeJ zxY7$6e=7nRPPtJxf3Z=T4i0t9i(P!lR1>7pjt8)IeL^Tf8%vdPXPP6247URAE)B*r zX&W7!ov^^qO;|BCx?;eg08|f2D710bQy}cbF99d@^+L%8STHK-ydDkxE|HcEI;UvT zLxeYEq7+rYeTKM{guHS|nW4T{E4XIjsU=M!f0RIb^oZ$zzScllY^v_niZ2-zn=>x; zS3~xp13*m49ykd8Dw=;VTenGePsC3@P-_bEsjgq_)IpN#=c}f?j~Abc*b@z6Xhibv z&pv!YaC}*T*7EDmzfzw-rltLY!M0c3OL?F9uHYf|5Cmw{GffY#YIL ze_YQ*^W`bk-NKD&IsQC5@Z^wH7Hw1>FFuLR4)L~q^u(fGSimh?pEGXA#Tb_P5N`cN z3v~6hh|irQ+z{4>Jh7_TV8o)x4#~uaVrv5`3w=E3GWz+d4Og@p(gb|Qw|Y9(gUH4X z;SBn;EY^#s?bjy+vvyXQ_TGn2o}4d4f5i4zSiy_`F&3fF?&|9k4_L$8MQw}_fkJ{8 zqD@T$83p2?cb3~IMz^RrU&!Xj`g{m>?YfbawAB5KgfzCq9P&-#WJMjo+c zwJDxn6>Tp3%cxz!MkBtaEh)Ah)4qO@p3_>|~Fmdujl>sORed2v7 zMbX?bbohH2Re?0$j)Mm;S)B300kK7LSAy6wzV!ronFRL{D=I_IQ0{iE7!>Yw)q2*` zPyv?&Yrr*8e_@8o4;~4ifAxhP5@#)nfy_xaX0&SX%rHr z8?7}+)_V#d#7=foB$<=STwj#kS>M*{Q?5jIfnWi}*HPW@V9?Yb;I;beZCL2+ zVYqh2$1@kwrYo=C&`nf7t+LTJKrg~Sq>6vcf|yUfg1vTZf81)g)Q$q$)S}Zf?l8J@ z!@&cdX;#0zQ@(f{7Ux%Ow~&vKzD~TAa;4SEv?!at6lrV@vBnpipY)GrA!xs%RWGLO zJ&7-zF!XUobC!O4R}L)SmBv+3zuPPM6g!aZA3U0UHbf-s(ko4FG2_+qlD;^f9+qu~ zG7}t45M+lue`OqE7dI>pgzc@ayEyn?O7K!d|EM@mKAG@^_*;mtOwX*OhGOZZqC&#g?Mi`hpawSC zGZ6@BnzGO68#c2kW&uVjBcdfeT&LI@sc~^0n#=iDe@ZkuU>4nNT|e+*1wze9t<0*S z-xNl;93HBOPa+de7(T556YMfG@KVtAP(R@gIb0(dK#FU^b(oRlNcAFNzbn z(i&CMe^BsWlt)s|yltrot>u6n?S%}n0+?Z(xBI^o39KpcNCuZ4M8Tp;o2jKI=iBpqV=DZN?qRp|KyIRd_FJF9H912ch; z!l)2x&m?_oMXNI`333xnLyIH_QPUVkuZXOX4&~6`i+3g7Z=9a!5l8=GptzdUo ze{9=sa2!~y!4;ZUh1nI&!Ptg{RovNZUJ$htZ7R@wOdWRHLZJ^Zg*g|41^zmhBkLxH ziii&JEw|)?GV|`l9?JYp{wRrSm5q@}O(D?J8V(f|<%qM|~wC|wQRTzEM zxyPMSXSL2oGTBjyb5*PbbXCMTTX=FEqNJ2GU3BpX4^D&k*jMF8>s)Gf$f-z7r}z9t67WVwOpT4bJSjpj z#$MIaWqDkuhFZ-3Ez=O0v!zTNW>WPsVzQQ{-#Le_tMI+(KPd~8wC1pLf7`q6g9k59 zKUEODQ??Zo7iBHa%hDtI4H?*phtweY>^AFk&^UuGE|`HS;)D>*2s_DT@KuD$kTRKA zyVq=4yz}epPm7^gE`Aw;YtgrtXuGT)KcZM^BcCHuHl{S;kQt_6q+4;u-J9@0t0rbw zJ_~^2PgJ{$6=HK&|L@zKe}rXt6Lyi6gqVYer7Z%J3_;~;-5QRIT+aImF?{CsGXPi<$BF^|5lP1~?Ql2YC4b+x_^J8+F~ zB-u+vYF2bsDw8qQx@)UpnJn!f@!-sryfJzz;+99c;^}WZ7{T#!f4EG-vTl(|DUeVb zw@x49=-hO+2ePk0qCBHio8j;%R25pMj)v-1svlS2+Y!NYVH9diQ4qn@PTj!fJcW64 zw2&mIYV5g&a9gQrv&`QLvz>ZX=oI-o$^3?BmZs54M!qkUEYP*F=aiX{AQynxbN^>a z(`S0{mD+vN)qNo5f1-*RjHS{GRHV#`Zcbi#&LvZ&Nm{HbfvLa_?1b~|Y0TTT@xF}u zsO&UQs$c$s3wLk19)CUOG;xi`DTj&7Le;~Wt!y6f8af4QE+~LzRnFD`8>B|vf1m*XrK+_{!ILlh9m)L< z9+lXNTwgcERwZAbw-sb`LimN*l^XvYGr^ku(ED6&>x8Xpa+}sTaG;uBNS8+>yN9YI zZ~vK?Vrcun6T2kd^BV*-PWAO#TZ^{&=W4y zv0o@A5*EOpe@D1MtPdNkHW4ylnbnEx&oH2#-Td`zU3KR7lt7++l!Y(5*e{UKR{{+n z+J|-6SHu#W6-KT;qJdT{Fy#VQ418_L-i%)dqRDIAmH`D%c$i2mp^e{u#k=sT-Z?!bIn_Wi(uYbh@}_qY{g`r){9Gewp(fA6yX zDuq{1evy`s^z)$~`UnicQ{<^tVj0{Z-AYxt(68asWr8Q%(U1-%YNU zz-&0ejP!1!#l|WjwhpU)H}YpO8GF3=eUs0<@W}9Aag3@lO)rQI89ZSeT=zKf{e3EYf4EH}3DNm9oAdiB>K!-3nhG2a!UXRzu9PYh^6kL?D!}!59rJr7oSny{u#^3C+J5yx4V#P zci6(=9WQ80M9@;fMkO!C42a79bmzZN$R2b4vmQYiC3{RjNG1zu2kua4^?FR)<`9=< zf4|3V|IRJ=%F!t&vzi-5w)yihWC2#mhSw-qQ)>y;lab2I%REvTpq6FJxf0`rK`L5K^k_)9q&ViOrQyE3K!Y=x#OP(u9 zxCItIPrA(K1SwYQKDkzgAF_si%-fRU|9G$;L-X%KWtfEqVp5r>*P z*)~mb=8qSG>gEsG=-roQ-g$6xf7n62Oi8H*^O!%VW0VU(wlMW8=DwZ|>(P{|O2bAT z?q$mMaR*=^B2*{I&trU|JG{oIav$D6C9MUp3%#H;UPPIt>b?vveTwd~rde@e(ON?d zdy|Smn2p)7(3=anF{2H<1dzu=mt#t8j6$vwi@HLDZ(19`%kC2-1_mdce^X%z!FiNe zPb8jEMR!+4f7lbAWS&QX7^Vjl7Q&_C$6^YdK`dQOyfh!8lCrVlEC|$yW|(}&*aE_5 ztK6H)CyRuc=nc+Vf2oAfY**tws3 zq(^aT+289B37ILW#K4~RDShD+b?~)yUI=dH|G$ z$QdwjjcJH0$}?{_!Ol+-GwMW+xGp=>3)qIG*_FycfP3mer=ATo%%+Wadt^{qn(usS z)g89eJ|}_5;nu7Pf1Db6coV5jDp4_jq#zng;wwL(PH*)kGJG zbqEqH`~)=CYves;+8e=v*9bF|Yko=DqzfpLM@GZ2F8bR8`_GKOv0F}_=MDF3rne0d@ zM8I3bmdqT=Bf2t-xlTpVW)0TqHd{5KJE0bg? z8|7>D&rW11iq)bAK_iCVTaECqWJDkKp7z^xvHS!ff;fRevL-c{){9z`tA+!cjyzPH3PyvYRNG z$-UaQf8jONK)$TBoj9Z{Uc-as!LyXf5T7ldP^m&QwFpn9Nf#!CwEPRZ|b zaLn3yXVPM>+bVk0^|7(kVQ_QOZaZ|^j>=(T%C$<5C?l6SC*7;X?5S6Mlk33-Cbh5Qkje;da4|IXRd5gm%ARy3e%6=BNL)w;w| z!Ll8UCUxg5Fk#uGYXg4{1%`;#kSnQrvq*gzb}?)+>?M6_8@NBza#WI52r_8XcE%b} zn%|qDI)Z|{<=~d}+bjh2ZT;@Mg#(O$lf{*VBGFpWya!ke@}*2EyR$}%-G5bBqRf~4 ze~QcC9-ZEP{u?J1Of%} zvX0^~LNe(h!b8+}x=49i2*tgk)ibi9wD!Q^~PX+YJl#=-awj{fkvo9I_%f3dEb z&3oKL;r!J2QSWPe$-D7)pRes_c>O=RKltA5_x1S&-sa*UCVlYuL)?~6S_mXy(Hr8pE_oC)OV2aP^#S<+qdw24{I@;n4`%1hbaF|uQsmCmaau@uMpwzuqO)gM$+@G%PFwJPvf%Ytb?Os zY6!}7qe$b_G3~SAVUN3JmfuRB5EfI+TS0bLeNNyxUP;XEi@XGafS`o=j0QdZu6>^S3%J1iL zQCuoefVMQEcViM~qfFt~OwiECK(M0t3wxdM4&S>FiULj+5;d6QCBJLQ^Aaac{G_hJ z3UnpI(vqibTQ&Z*IL_s!e`&i1-KZ=cX;(8bkgW-|S2Df^Zz%xky4ply8czuY_u#mJ zpD}@5W}+dfHgt@JD(-_@^dW@(FBkG0qaDM=^%fKXPz#9|dl<6TAWYzdk`%eqkkul; zvlV4I8=;f-cj20vk<|rno1Q|tAmv56WK!|5j{EvhRY+;?D$v$xe-*P@MdgP|f&)#J z4Jc#^o~U3F0c9#4ngt00_5n#MOgWj*ZmY7LEDAR5L6#>itE$l&DkKz8p+Xg!AX1(l zkC%r_#_1GZQ8g=7sdpf>rKTB>m~{pJstpBO-LtvJH`f1QS)liGCy#HFJa>z+5a zpNScg^V^Dv>Ajx}w>-6mD_425JeD1fv>!?55Q+SldvcEd(00RnP)g zSr(7iagS(ezxQCyb(wGo2&$x7kiaAT;nWV-7L5s7g|uQ*rs8KI|GT}Y6$3xkjpQ5= z#u}d&av^Dkf9c7IVK6-<>a_Uuqo1M7DTL z{qD6J@vO+Q8mU*qdPQRbLKK}yxycTcFm`U2UF(j7f1m^vj6V79FaH*j^?wWh|NqPU zsLGfohxZVi&Z^AtSs&*a;7(YbIJPc|USPKNRMFBB;3snp_T-zj0&=1)JCK-Bc}mbb z)a5odc&CnGR?4|bOv%%ZES=)Japsms%e?ILPT&Sb>{1A}pHK<4nx~pXt_rU)(zjvK zAu~Ctf9`Rud=4{IMs3&^K*vs7YAad#aj+j#!Vez5Ctvo1$3I!f+(XtE@$zmlFz$1+ zu6%mqfa`#yLW0|n-L~*#A@macBnnCp$`jadwr*66Me=Z-aAmDCFrXnNCXrHcRqhMP zBanmoB83pH%r77%&_1?Flo)RQrbZt8V;r#Pe@?_eEEsWKUkMnr^x(GbTZnb3pE@ ze@z2Q-;PN8s%J%%cnmBfh7SALJl4EfPfZ{#zpd2`GSJDZn1g;bJI~f{ywAMsSmj3v z5;0iljC944^_z9e+(CB-}pj%Rfn6~PgXRg^>rvMv7C#@Z@_Tl zpx>OKV64F?u^vvOoeIL`jf^8F06Bl+S6)$DZr64)IYIp{o${OipblM`+!cT)>*m?& zXz2dn6`}k6A2@V>4pk@1m)L_$oyx^KWwU?0c=x9tJqauL-JiYt0X52g=K-3&e`9&3 z)!74&>p{|7m618A-*1^f+6^OfC&uqGpVmqTe}I|dZM=_E6>R}x_8~dH7mIg(U5N?! z;+O5XD#m)4g{=8f{UD^K3af4mmBXDzq|3#-Kl|xV9&toIZ$5i>ncmy<;QLv2>f3_# ztlsToOX~K)@Mkv1R7vz?P8un_ z;HErFDLS>#wn!c&B;zo|M1QUB&O^J?qzEX7Nvm*b`oWf)u}ZN3-`N$77{EbGG}H+@ zCe*T?i?!&JhJxu)MxUdKTDX%y)W$yPK?~=hfi=(OS?#@^iu7$jhCh!gfBvstY>6$Ai^~bhf}?bl4FG$6rmZhiujkLF~pIH3~3Zf z8SArc(TF7iUQt}vqQ5RQ*+ShB6iKU~+UL@M#u5GPf6jF|Hr%ER&rgUi-~K&~1m}r5 zy^)0kme1I)P~?yBo$_~kf9dGVZC8tU>piAtpRwU_3_C(mm0S7>=N|F}nR1)>8&Wg` z$YiS?QPmMv1zUSZURn|uzun4ol=Mf7ze}qYB4H$JaH}2xFBB6a!SiN|{Rh6GdH!_! za{Bf6)wFj?%5GEO%F?j&ANm{LYMlHA5`*)!n$jV>w4=FlCWhhme{}!&dVBim8`;z6 zF~l0m#f{}9aE(q2cg9tI@)uS*2*(4L9@2`gMtDbdp8 zXYYQ5J@M1`4@(nbyDmZsRE*YovUi!D$@ic7JS|gQ629Ojn#xPAD)7pcbYP(R!K@8m z>KF=yzgIK8p&bRxJf?Y2e~SybHjleN0mGl9Tvz=jg) zZN||n?fTK!EEFN2Am1%_GaBKzDmVL0z{MoGRnwx zv%2b9E=1cjQgUFf&goSMa2Pp^mV`cDe3df$5E~dgw(7l*`*4}BiErm-gIM#0*h8hB z@1}SM)+o{ze+gv*k#I11x?d&6pC1tX3|}C)3K<4c--2!{1Do*Oz^SH!5o0Z=c$)B~ z1@Gkh=8{0eyILGNMD^%a%pfSawTW7K*pfnWDG~E5Qb%=?P2UFyTaL?ka}_}XSFuPn z%Z%C~-3KE9WhfPyJbjt8M~D#P&wubN`i{^|Q+3x&+#$zfuh z0dUT&Re7H&wacDqL{)SG!c&;5p+#^cc>{>^hir%288j#VNXPFfS@DcduD0;R#3m3o zdKnTIf2wU~@kh>0Cx1P(Xp-M4H-)8e=9sMGPR3D(iuf@A;0prITLf$-bnvq4yk6K&^qsV^eYPVH;_0T7JmpU1$w@6 zFNUkITVd)FqS7~g*qa}GG+Pz^DK>i<9^@$=e_lNWfS9~GM520fB)210N`BrUK$+gV zy_iW29<;TGz2@0};mT!6*=1pnwwrjXXN3@1s3+KE>1b^QRjMTGh{kf#fl_EC>z8)q zoYbqyDa;tfj#DR`8yL;Kji^*9)$chz8lS>6nzax*VQS$7S^S^xYx$f(WkmFs2gZWRrid(VJRBs>9H3YV? zt~TbW`H&T2PyVVf)o`{&=yY~(CL7UvTd59aw3+E0R#h45y>lDJ$){r%I{;Axf$uSp zgw=IKBk+@a%HK~nkM9ym?M+RTB7B8Ve`{9D7+4`lDzKZ9UJ}BZzHSnbbopA*+JP>eXeMn5ngzyEG=n8>p|Zfw4Lz3p(Y}tQY1F+=sfBR1u3V zRXAEtc#P854f)eIojLt*t^q(T39#@k?s|op6+^KQFT}Fb^yHH-K3}SIdNGujrt2Jj z@a3of!sfLSxZA!j2y_0xB=E^1fm#*RzMliq7i4usX z2^i0^3;)cs%NhAQ)zUl*m0nkEgv3^ePY9@gi(;Et2d`NZS)B=-zA&&1{Z=UCkz!fu zS?t~1Fw0sb>JR}*pMR2FL!m&VK3un$NKdGQ7_E-$%_N?ob`k9ylPHbme**#@-lKza z@24L|be`041m$IZ9N5ry!mC0_eM|Y_k^y4K!`knBs;7yQ=fA?qa{mi~JLLZq|YK~}@Ok;d3+YrL9%AWkR=Kgl?Gfz!a zSY5bI0nZ-_0)^}S;~(WI-h3k`BXVLU@8Z;nxc+h_<$rVw29uT2#Ni88MHl5mcf!3; zcI-Q%n|dX;f9MZIT`#^2r$8A_opv>}vY_Q&K1$HCByW*nh~3RJ{0XZ{$;(algHT9_ zs!N#Y2awuVn3sE|ePQh}|5O^_sl`CKG;&ny;Z}CM)ELoRObXJlmm&pAfBXTG8m-!V?OKtkaP51S7eviF zlu90u8I8JYP@pM!vkS3BV)^LeNaXU0TcAJ+<%OafR*s_A9Tk4|MQ;SMu+FQxwyJtB zmTo|6Lmo|1kQ(!=|6%mGY1z5VCsU$D<;0FyH;=0jV#AXVD1Q=dfm7&yTdl*%er=>;psc4~dCRn$ld^MM2K3;sPgK^2X;J`s0Uf3m7 zCJAg}toC##C{y6`BeFLk{b>yuPurmIZ}r? zd0X?vfLXv*(I!_zZ{LMh!*9y37oU~|j)vd0ZC~!odVo>@zGi>+`|$GEQziDcku*wR zK_LR{E1iDP<216yrJEEMfIO-`M^vL(^4S>jrZVI7CYt~Q84KBfnpWm!ZSJL}vkE_7 zfAiaNGPNoEq>&Dv>s9!eC3UEaQ8^y#*O#R^?Xb%a=%`aGiB4{zI7-0Y-@MdHBReFb zekSyp>>V?6m8|o1PWQra{;{nc&B<`jBz{w(O&*`Quyn_$i+0d)Wr4nE=$TZwss@=s z=7#GX6Dg3-H9zy&ZMM|kjzkOEbU=X#f1LD*CR(QCl}pv0%UK<6SXj?_HX~Sfy2p8i zYhI${idDBZoTy3I_3G}4k6d*D21>hR1-#WFt~qD9P~sstQdz$tk?ZM zqnS_dn!)Kiz6oDMs^{>8t0xuHG+jF+mK_xfifli1H$~l2;ukA7WqoB(B|($zMF)3x zcXwxScXuD$T`z;X!^H=8cV}?d!QCAO2KUFe`)7Awcl4i(tdm*Q5!D@)nJ3%cqFP!% z84iG0n6_hf_#{vf)o))3gm2P9vMeM;zs&?a7O58cx^XM}o3*MluKz^$gbrKP@}>_a z67H07-Z}@$65)2+xmqh(?bTxs!A{kA-Ava;+uZC*O$;&jYrXv0i>`~QVJT;iw?;Zn zn)73e4k!web72K(^s-^2@%tZ|l-(a5tjqyN3frOwDZhwwGx_KjPa+BHgALVXnRbq8 zb=T*%F&W=_Wj9d`H#bWIcNv3w**GEmX2)9c$Ck#na)qcM%m#9aD7eq^A~3QU;%$wu;Mrax(b( z&ht7y3R?+3s&;>y;hSeruR#em3oNJ*W8tcB6jE~K*OP$my5UZE)S~{ zX49-poTeO96$bzik@v8SjS~)tlfl;UmROfY4NJ1UCQLF)aqeN+TfpqM!-fgzCH@!- z)#1`iF}Z!uB^l*mx%}^ifw% zMk0|DX}|?T!cj&=)0r}_xd&MLU|tcy`7@ie;qpb)ZnZPrwYUjlO0>sy)6fcz%oFkT z$utB5^p~VUL0emBOL1#+gUzn166Fl57lw0AL!7a`E={cw#@2w~$1K@`3b-y@r}j3c z*Yg=%=~bw7DdPJcp_QNp$Fg3E1ToeUIi|6s^;DJ^Geq4-Aq?kB!Z1)}jOhL=b#M0& zg27*tHBuP8ANo}f)~5VJ6U3w=dX7K~(@dE`bxUz|=hvRVZf4YxQnaGIEy#wZ#;ZJM zRBkI`D5)L2m3TCi7%VspPiqf5QY<3s^?qM4E39}Ke{FD2-K8>`2K{Qyw=r;}4Pj39 z_j5MmmjbtiDx|&PuWMlSn>_4!u24PSA2fyi$?nsy6DQuFI_J){Uxvxk*}~M((RG32 zv}BEIWQES)9@g@m=47Od_W_WL*ncP%t4}Im5zkTXLFAkk>guignZ2)X=*U_p>zGfc{YDS=uhNtlk3p4MF4r}3vhwSjQ|`stU!fWPlCAAc)w5SgF8K}2 zq{+Y-1`VvGeK64wqRJswh|@EeP5xKKAB?LnPhgBy-H(C zC_S5sLfqV~iLh>7sqK4Ta?S_SC4PC#blePcgg>dWUHY^_g%z;(JGeu&GYn-o%SU+5 zgVREr3|;L2w|-#v*0h|SqBa>fFcPjmX;Urenal6zf$2O^==|}k96=Y?hK^jX{=eE2 zGy8uB4^YgDznT{aNVt|t8;!`I3I&yUSr;eVy9a`&@&I_{fQ;SXlXcc5R|^6XxpQN9 z=XWcMzCeXe{Y`LxZ<04hXi?a){$QS1Zab5_NUDbcHf0dP@f+zhmOIYu=-*GrbK5kFpl*f?D-=&0LKBz6ZojX8oDN4?!?4Zf(iRBh2^b?= znHw&u-puA)Kg-Svhs4t%SW1aDdaajq+eZ6sU&fz{-T)7*5rL3@)KRVr2z!4bl-)ZC z$H@DJ+f0Bomsc*`q3)tI-<0%wmZxp3EyF|qRtFwfc&K%MPVU~;n}y3>yTe{+9RTVC z{Q4Av*5V^r7{x92n9E^UJFaVYKj7NKn})rt_9>m~(9o1&_Z-+u+6fJDEu52B)8&DT z#OXY~bk?ZHx-@{{fXrZ%1TI)VGZ6GWssHWjvDue@6hWy5k{pt@11?HkDB1 zyB7*kV4Q4lzwkVgoZ75uO22r`4qQBxX0z(DIEhcd4_N+%^%HYZR)o3Q+uMLhl&jt2$Dul4!#gB(*<+vszB}&3Q@I~i9zarqj0?cz}9YwqCxK2E16??POE!iRz3+~@G z!IRW6WRN9?!X%j?`_&g2m?%d^MPBw9@;z`#?uAI9Yw*@|(b8bq@R#an9nq#Shhte~ zFmv4CaTcYsFDXkr8AlG4&bESyuD%K7BYD|){)6D*IOie;()R(>SH3?xl|UCpPzw%Z8A)#j{*ya|k-$D}ZtUu`tT z6Ay#)F}(n@iGOfbnx4630PIYozW6c(&F3tgGHUpJHpts6hs=%Yo>Mbtof-R4kBO$X9A zBj3Elg+tHkEUR{g!I(<(Of3+$kJ(QVuLl;exm8NcoU5je6q+v6gn4Zn-B?_;O^a=# z^DM-xR)ewQZf6eSb2KLzE`h{S81LySbO-*HoV1a=^qOo{OiH>`%X>2noj8jSCte@Dgf8G3+E_c+f9nT(F%ypB+Ig|NCgPR z9ih}xZd68OUcYkqfY`F7g%H-$Xkw>n-eI9vCR!bMw~5)JI;&C(ps!w$9e9atLv9YB z!o$De7sxlIN6e!2;ESr?(iQS83Jrq@5obRXg{Wb*MBS4yN{=V9-pc@J*+C~G?UdVk zMXV{QEY}%mYXddi_JHtBd%7ntAp^;mg>|7&iRb~=u-;X0_|QZ3~H&9VFpaK|TF z{S~HBe#rz=5_V-UDftW8aF!?GN(VJgjru3ME}Bf?`-#bEfD3qU0Y6WRv+moV2D1hhNoX*RbFKS+J{r+-xBO?Ik_tyFdC-CD1*1 z`}$k7{!~Z8R#9nxr6yyKHBXCH81wT1>S1aENVRqFvaFy`&;>R=m8=n9{o0CZ&@$7a zONX4?yPxd6f`Qv9{g3I-(jUrL^Ap-lplG9TPXuBt$|WT~7Gj|!uLx>X+cd8k%JB{e z7KW%w?OS$D3br`B`SI9d^ZfSfL)hQp4K`uG>W{nl{zs6li`U98v zJVxVhU+ut)Vu(f&FCVZ96E=$a-uAf6pT}Dnd*#T++JI(3`BJxttzy#@Rkh>?w9Anb zD{8oQMcC&f8=MJGkt4y%9x;W$mbU( zfM%PY>HzFt!HHV4d8C3P61(iA=mL(lJ5DKJ>(`bhhz zGGGOhy#~!wn7bE$Uv|SrWTP5Wy^BLA5AVMh6;)_hjk-@%3s^Sf;KsG~x#i144q2T! zf~x$Y#RxA$y$>5F@rqI$EB&1#p5^NnoHAkbz6~Ttn%U=H=%3UcSQ|!&KCU>KaLcdf z>jFaUCVC>j*$vSrSa4shI8hc@saZrSZ5pbp^r@kqm=ma>PZGbUb&Zdf;+k4l7N=^0 zBV4&)jwj(8MDTw?9p(xhwIZI} z>mf8WWF!|NcGDv6Sn_>{(!N{{o~*MwV+028HJb#I$8g)K+)r%OP`vDRESLzwXT_Nd z;=*7aJUm~R1YFttrUXmbZP;JY)Z=)Pju+<%950A?S$X4bIq*I?0Uc5C*+q7jUX%L^ zN(i)-M%Pr2)q?1l@{Lr<@S-3#f0MRGA2PGkH=X8T1=4=Yy2T+6wU-{ehTpBG69Q6G z4xc24@Mm6h6SBur*Bq&u+{d}*8hM3p@=O9H8&g7mQVslm$rVoLM8z< zIW@h(mHXIG$Eoqf`Y`0X9`I~$DYfvY0|(4MwZ7S=M~TjLTs});C5AazrR@}@^WuU+ z3M^m9|L&^r;2WKLUi$6@>VYcq$2zdL^0=(2;bBNtYDVv;=$eQMypyztTFyZlzkIKO z3dtnq?3vBb$Iz2Y{yVK&t%rUt+l!FpH(#te%<7f3HpMNp3S8uXNrA(gXw@T&HczvV zGP+UY%tG3iGCxemrD5!g=lut`{H>%Y$X`(z!K5rtRjt*|0s4|)Z!S^ZR>DBK!$gLg z`gQR+ObL}xn~W;B7{8q2Z1p-@B*-7C^-RN4G6lbGh1>AyGx}u>OOngKwZ}ObMi33k zly)FaZ+iKl2pyP5=HJqlTGG%+*hjg8xXLT+4lyqZxd^6_Hm9~Rp0e*`7!*$?su+qY z{NRJ!4g&8d-uBS$+=dCwL|uSd;rCRjQ|v-=v(WP?e21q3^e*2I_9#NW>8GdCYWgMPrs$k?-t%5 zwg$YQ2%&RF(D5m+y76MD8(CGi%G-o4tNHoPDNBSOppmRgc89VY^+z43fiYC-XZYix z0<%RmBa+QEZ9P$#oSkHwygn>hgvM=2R!f5a!v5T)t@NgM!Ff_5_Og3gS2?f;-tN8M z=H9tKy~{|ms5K`_6?r0pym6e`W{HE5;paO53l$Bz*phlyG#{<%UY!h#l+Gmpkjy)i|UL{JcZ zM1i7s%Q@8(9iuJ$XS2wrPK(2&VG3=vNA8zWsj~Cjs`)3Zc;d(I^L%6!ZcX$Bn>u>@ zaF;*#5{JA3U8&q#)Od(qp>LSP+P!J8nER-lLs1*HY+G=FbkYR}1 znQ&FIb4rrg=%5I&f*4+UZP-fvkpGl6TzF>+S_lJ~Y{QrV_Bl06oA9?$5hwELh{Tb_ z4(WWkF#ROI?KII}Quc8|h{Z9YM#p7p|6dJ%9>~S=`8WE{nL?ov-9)juxtje6ScgOEA0$Lv*iPdJd*8qX^g`<6vtCM+()L_2w4Hl-> zhRZ?m68X3R)QDq~aK#WP84Dh}z(szSL%DBD*7Wd};1rVZJw`r);v^1UUO(=HNaluS z6ns`gMgZMF@w%>9lEQ1BZ0Y2Wo9V-;?Qr%B)GV4j{zL@-3w!6;}DBYx}iZ(F?jI8(*;URm#NKln9A!nzs(_3(Oz2 zvUj@PCfS0MDNpqfyIz}1`++aiYaV)TaQwUI$s}z z_jj|(UYIuc$flzfzEgUgcR+Ohxa48~5%G7XEXGI%p{hf0uq|x%^7F&o%4j>oz`^3L zzAcR$)W=BR5FNGR>neZnE|L{5yFhTSv4ZVlPupxc9ueR7cqqXAqpL6kzyBcT(Z55* zU;vW@a%zuexa=@WQO-)>kkvqo zP_u5M)ILjh^yorO0VVA8`aK7?5MPoL){3_Nt^yIcVFGGe@PmJO8w0ICuFNgsFg;8~ zY;I6{JYm7j<$UGz07aoM{v`>8i~L}TQ#qCusD2UVtBB_)i1F;~F*?;IQ1(ON)W zI#~-LmNZYc`YVB)3nhQvN<>&;&L+qA(W&42KTGW4^fF$k*?R&od;Eg4e@3}_UT_h~ z0a-9MF9Wq?ebn7|2tWy(VX9UkEwzYz5@Wa_zL2=8b*4&^;zR0ixafUbieq!vT(~aJ z&uw$N$Cl$jO;O!Rjo4VTy)#31-W;B=T|G7nM5G%ZH{-1ie&t6gkL3Q#_pJB#q|2`gwpam z0-J2)If5*!e#ir-HT;}=Q~B-kN!siB;n8e($@ihr{_SW`<0^*T$mI}^jZ3Avo#}>La2Ur z)ItjT@TM+{ed%I--)k6^L!m6Q)t$&PmTl8Z^lwHTZ|Pj6sHO0uZHRO`iPU=*%bDNp z2(h>qvdyX=DiBnOvYy7ZbhxO9fd?E#(u$1y?zbm}IQGuotIf0GM${)4o{F{UXo93k z0&WrPYDxq;%whj_wkqzu$_+M6r&2ZbkS=de-HVP@2=a@05}cKw4Vn>)sdVHv--xG( zG1bJ`h&8CIic6{sEM%|mdL{gq%%AEvQznBIIP(bdU3E0*txd)^Z%Z3xfw|H&hVI3w z#4_;G@lRGW0DWZqsoO)Xa zx_Jhwq4o$cM2Xn}Gep)A8qqHpz|WO_8Mw18H&^D7UAy8n ze!f*28~BfZI+&Qp2JvBx6n~w6&j7I7&{fd)2_6JsM%gHomrD;P2d0 zU4_sSI`!m~o^i*afYTY(?RR0UB{YPV6l_9Xt3f*}(P(fQ`-jv6c~cf1KZ<<%CTU@5 z2EZ-XGAt$YlJH$tymeWokq?$7yEP@Udjyu!#LUW+`cYl%5i8dV69519OI0doyWi!c+$03*H1*r7DFeWUoA>Kmo#*8Q|JPW>x0su-WnZs_yB zBW`VxW}|s;W*Dn`(U4T}rk^RK2JtCVXV4gMQ#h%xKZY(O$@Z0HxGzSyU14XuH>lHN znyJVewKd+NAWk9F%nq2e!`I7_L&|o4+c9O~J4HtrYXCWz*bH+8-VJ0`L5iG@iaW;o}EH0g@>mFC3=lVIPKItPONCno=(HtY~fUMtQb;RSXH zbiV6NG_EG7G$mba`hWV`Kt24B za1V4a7dtOVdS8-wMapQzmCH^A?P)|{hfJB=x!hI|sry5k$NRE~d$zwg>^ed`-cdFwn$ruMD73=@hZ z8}b`~oz5k$742|Q3u#Dofsk;El&31puOXC^LFuqgyq(2=mNpX@Llk!;j22It5eH7N zmR_62)n?<4sz*AtCUkpLKv;msI}51KGwUiqLLw}lyGoI>EPjRo8cnKXAgyMYSgoyh z=pK2OFC>FW@UJ;#eFM~j1**V(^m0&KSW4>u9zLY$1!nYTb8><0?+r?W3T;TGq6L&X zipm)6Ye^Rw z;teWV7^W7JxgS@gN&0d&elxZ1G&$eohDjI1pm_EKd1<^essb=VOnGS^>OVT_jQ&Yy z)!RTOvEL;7buX$+lNsWsUP@^mb<H(W$*JdL@h(Tlcx=_~& zl1push&&=JVF$CTPsJIZKmm&S9`|}fB9k8GXnOJ~VqQ?YYM;I}RH558Izp$0##%hR zV>)pI=lqI^T2oalJHc9bZwMZ{D`*JBzbRdU=Fl+;xy!{nO^ZL-bUeJITFK!tT;Yl> zvpmHu7>hS;(HWA-Y1R49$3t-TlXNJ&e{u3XRd5%Q$d@N|RNT(%{{xyMsV6lZoNM$a z`zPwI`CqIhBk{W!rtH*aSIgZ(OPD(U$}ZQszLDGhyLd_+sJ)~x(q~?}Y7S&k$wKwU z7|qj_qYsBi(z}Z@%bqc}Q^n@PZuVxhp|{jVWFTRAt=L6pci}cMa(Z z*t!Shpqv#=?-14&{n&DZ(5_$bjc6=4t=Ql!3SF6D4uN|T%mjKo6Gb8+>W(@r7M95> zl6MQAmW5Ad7*(BLx7CW8DhS?#_+gd1K%}PNDB%q+m~rgM!)7xZ+y|Sx6k*lh{jRij z-9OKNtAc;i<`DWELwDj+J`JY8>u}Jqf>MPfjXO8ak$n3QE!D5c!&hB&Y7jhk@Qw5HPWCl)^*|cAH)@yK zHlobcbj8%xGKa=3j~+}x!`AzI=0k@ed={&z8b&iEp%74D%^LUYT;w0JEy;;Smn=n~ zZ~lIb+@Hs?)UKxo;okSk!4}8Qm&@(sJoAkaOKzYb#QZMSABNa+++0Hkxcq{-3M80N za)?j)hEiuX6ZL>;9Nyya;KX%gIBswpB%ZQ1$_;gfaPdzBPJ1#0nC7Z= z+Uw;lX%<>hey>vAclM#&VmG6`sY7K`kuCKZoc#sz;3q}=28sn5{>H~R>97o+ZCy3&CHGo z2cLsgFhSs+hap{ks2@3@=m-8yoPG3mirj(NqQZliu$uG7B*#ixGlh73i6tz}Xkcpp}vkoMmZT zblMlnMBpg;P)5d{-#SPbOo6mkZvnfVz9AfG=_5yWFyjsOr-e$>skYq)Gy8Fi{D^IDmaQ8mZxEfMLs^$hp?FGHuw|cP zR$8%l8ZIFoDhg{--}zNARSnie>1G5Bdj}_Ddvg*|@@nQ=wqK*#3u>fImR-KIky3}j zNf5cFehN4}O$&Y}^T{Y*@3u2e&5XDT*?KO-b`G78g9L9Ry0cSS9z!(huv7K%HrBsv z(iNXqD1-k_lcsn?|07tzqR(4z;dNf0et>*cy-2i3>$etC4-+ zjMp6%ONLyi#_lqI5HY$qoL;6D@9!Yl!?!4NUPr8LWi0XISMl8KMbOa^C1Fjs+R7+$ z*j5mJf!SH2X-`1>`obX%t`VhO*;m8sk(G39RnaI6ko{;jUFx0VgoB1NN0jcMikkNL z=^p_U^v7&N-e_s2-_{I*_giZ~OW2{t$*v8ny|DK9YXWHbG5Sg$a!A_XywI5M=@k0l zxN{}O5Wdo-1_6AGshqVcS~`E$E-cL`8Acej4K@L|q30p^bDK3Iy1gL_XoPf_K4h{I zCMIReQ`9&f7^~$8k44(`L>bYY!|37VOnO(Gn)%Icq;;PMu2K3>CLU41c+rW#TYV5t z`xD_d_Rf?7W(IAsmIU?L@9kutpd=Myl~S8IOT1f_T((AwLc|)rY?cc2ghR8MF&MCV zCOl7@iY|34ZZ+p|w?IQ&>uOt3HDVu05qs;Anx?|6USt}rVisB{ zQZ-^a-)baTW=w;~h4TzxSuDapCJH8XALnd+_S#Nc)Hphyhl``;^slva_Dpwqbttb1 zzRWGks|GS>wit+aY55Ud8T&uk2Ge?Eq;6*I6uFiOYu|Tql6t9DZ!5+_(}z~*vllR_ z#^#Pb0!!4WW!P5@+d|6Z%Msg^BN%pVTMQ+obJj#;ZGw0RO&LMJge$AMx^c0?)LdEj zioeyqs+`&}7aw$bu)+`8ikwWn(Q%j&O@l*q5Lk-ohSRtLnsNnf_GN?lzEG9r*hk{* zr71kc6Zww`DHL0r_Gj0*0pCE#P>%**EZpM}RC;;*>IlcvbF_A#4tuT^(f%|h2IAVx zlFf6Svy>5YYK|Yk@`B4NB%g1hO%WU->Cdp~F(b?=E^J0LV!tOcNT?@!vSDCIIjF@{ zG${44MLi%d1oWYPnd)NS+2*B2_19J@RY=fa+7ovF+tF5T#3{coef6<+eHo3{1x50p z2wtob|CnjCxxS2x(1=xFuuP6YC(PEa2ptXHP^bFbg^yzfrlg>4Tdd(mhTfVKSJ{_Y z@Ok;?Q@Zgtljg(Gl?q)ThB~#?1Ii&zU3j8wZtFFaqq1JNgnA#VkE%ZG)p?5Pvtz9} zbdO9t8KjgE!IiC`Sl0=67ZhI>%J>XxhSFAuwA=rN^jol7`BI^Z`<7qz)MOI+Yu0#4+CzW7beESM)EYN~e*2=u)N=@@E_qWC+uj9ze=1{wO0@HRlQummF~hs5(U zN*3aoqDi&cc$T=gwF90UaqFD^CP7Y$Js!wb#u|FE{?oDCD0i_e?e_^>x2mEvc%ND^ zPakRgr#`YC1QAu9PEKnB7?uv%f2mwl>wNEh*x}&7BqFyInW#Ef7utml<;>3poK@gVtpWOX^6KU;dA4WviWOIx$djD|(+^KW_?MaKnq`Xc{kA z=%{sve!@7~>neocc-b+$eO2i(94O5*b6Ktk%Mrfsc~@SrU6a}p7Sr$*v6;E9Q}8p2J>%Ukk)Vkkm|Q5gz~brh6VwR-ouVvo65hr_aX9n^DL z?-8eM*U;U937Q%GeHr6S8sYn*h@i{PC#|CVyz^uo9{Vg$EOPaIBkiwfLd3Im^;cqf z-_qub%=H#A?zo|o!GH@Ug!s!gL*R1WGHFZ?Jg8MBRH#<8DARpg7?xr(_QkL;Z;owI zxfw)dE}hVFYd4*si<~`q7^XmvNP3MgL!+e(+>QDCX!4?k@!n#@-L70iap)P=&!yO% zbtco{5KvQLPFIR)393B~>7@c2fwxTHD zN@U{ZSS@NDBKIjkX!6##*8f9;5g)mpJi|i+gmrF!Y5W*5IoQp0gj4!Z&zd6oSXxX=qe?aNW^ z+tv0wL6(hGI3>n%d3|nBF9L`h8#`|!x~Lqi$vDq4jZ&VU&^YUaI+N}Is3xrwlWm{gY)Ln9mIyYIO6sI|12D z7(U3zX%z&`4)q9u3XeU3yHlU1#1ssl!5;^|K6bl*1<-u9p?uC<&rtu1-(#!F2EK%Q z3VX55sP_<8_VFo1^pbw%Dbev=o)u&;*)nX*pOR;-m^&Vws48DpPuzC!y8VRfNGZ!i zvr@Y@zp#<7Y*OwQY|~$X1L1U{DL0=L)ILBFazEPp|Ek4c06;lkYX9vKJOsX7Jq`e%C+6tjX5rvwr0(rx;cCF-WpDR?C;2~L s$N!$>4?FmV$z4Z@B8}QU9ahUFDh>b+VEOtC=3YlK(e~vvdqxS zYT?h2XDpQkt!fDwI)Fj*{3>NCVYP-wT`SO*gYle^Gzn7~+E}X+j1Aj>peAq%>Bx1h z1+{-J)g@MxebEwdM935iu(Y6-;?~etqa!+67HqUsTU~Vq1;bE*0BH>lgAkvz7PK%I zFLcbAQgC}va8Wvtqk3=nC~TT0XyQ)l`VaBj^5MA~)#tK(Dh4P|kBuZu1GP|i&LHW_ z4a{qNcfVSoJR;GxPo{oIRuM_U8+YDQ{Of;yYuLxN&Rh1BxVQkrG*{N`uqS^2F0ZI8 zx9-97we}ZJon(aCRaVs4rCa)%Lved>9v85oBXPw3A8G27*pJC7oFrl7&e=$VL04JB zj<J0)Qjp23E5 zc1PDnX)vw@8+Zq4XJO-V?p*LE9wk?;)0|;c$jvH-dy+L=Za!~egwZgy5r#NhTCs z0bMrSaN+zVHYN#9y?W3Z(A(BEZ<-5llx8`J$xt{TeXijL!*yfXgyfg-8}{I~J@ySy zO9u$CD>b-V0RR9~0ssI|O9KQH00;;O0Pt>pTmS$70001!NdwLU@NRyy8U!8z1MqHs zvpWSZ0R!-Eev@+=B7f|COOG5^mfqgKBEW?~0$C*%MTrkt9H=R&TVqNsiyBYc8{uZ; z&CH-8BT{iAlB`|{-g({L7_foHY=-OsW;U}ide@2hBmGN!zH`ofMAn0^tXnK7T-7$8UOPIxd9AQb+0LqF@#(d{`+xq+gS*!X*PCW$>b9|; zUOTq#+TT3*5C7@u{aITME8Fx1eL~~zx1U}cy5_zsmv&{`!Kx~|*0uBgplnz7+xfgI zt^V(tzN7o}+OqH0_dobR-*ninZ9~t^+iqog`mUpd+Hb7E z={~yl0iJ7ymAt5`H?@Ds&G6h;GyfRB{)6NVZf#2X9D06g>2_GWjs7t6-qOiFx}_gd zHTa07X@3@MQusAwP`W;RO^46>ApT!}^|Wn&#I1dd7t@=nnZCO*EBdk@e)!JL^;&-T z;fL?r^4>@HKD_zEtvmPb-Mjtqhj;GCr~8ljf`5m6h3ueOyaMz~)}3{>+t_Ol9@0^$`py=&i+{iV{J#pkp_jLv|Ak+y)=T3mcWwM7 z5B@9J3_U+yQ*DuX1&C& zbwzI*dY7Bfc6DV}^{y~Ov91SKkj0(1bbot!W7{?DZAV^ToPDusXSQqbKHC>F+M4_| zc0RZC34Lb}#ULIr1KI3iTG>W^hiL{|yTX-iZRiZS0!IhW&`)Y+e1b~+h;>VzLw;d9 z=v(P5(J!UnQ;^?r+ZVQ=7q?Bj!t3Y)>f*RCMQQ7yDrSHE`G4cEzVfjj*_qeB0e=sI zRiFd1eSvE$W&_r6(QTh&nagE^-+9gtdXul6&{EREVKLUG<9qejpa0L*uIc^n7(7xB6xHMWlbBZn131ig|(r(yZvYSjm{S2cq`}V>+y0t)fjvOUmkw- z5}$NfJhVN%f_55xY-2iD;f=*UZRs=I(6OoBR0yRD`pxuZZQU-!QV+Q9jjh}D+TzDd zigx?|igIc2tg{2{q_}AGA-18gjaI3%4V~=L$`3L0A+%0dWD3*aX*&MH)PGncz2hal zxuMOu9{8e4z9{IlkU&#HzX`(QS7SiblBlMup==JWjWkrjMm0J!7fvr1y zE7y|K9R0SNw4Y{RZUin)^xuo@bpVPEWU*WxDTTw-~VO-$eUd|4z+2p z)8+%6%RSqi)32CJMnyZ>d4GGp!Ith37}NQdgXfCvANl0`+aHDv>?5CjZ~MiD^k&s| z>m?mxr^jDB4UQBJeQLZKwkczCH?npxb`8B2cVKN0y^&qoz%+5L%qKKh1@cg?t>`=S z4Hxb`D0q_p?#8nZR)e@%?}9^cxu{mMF8KE#i8svI3NOlWmnW~alYjTSDxDRRNl}{E zLJC+*aXvGcdc)Z!Szd}QY71wTZAmU|r(jK*S=a|XIhkRcmt;BndXnku>ViUy|1GiP z28WCs8aZSNi54yUF+T7VwaqFGB)5OkJ&jXspHUcP;U?9+y^G%M!B;ie9*U6X6e}V4 zEhn&S^rP2pMOR4I(tosw2Pi8CGS5*V(8)qGb4YP-TWP%cPHN7 z#%s`{>B&pNoqv#8P|iUHDUE(8vGE26`4-M=XG3yFhf{CK&a<0pgQqy_rrc*k$C&?G zw8I7^0Q`k`Y`T4+&!AEOL!r-D2b*BKJ!ih}qGvdx5~(+VtT*3DdZwAtfwGkbqRvVZ zob5m_x(fD}kEv8IX$!5TB*QcTikSjLq zr|=}F?JXUT8O7lIoLIKL>Ia0H4xZsc?Z6x*2r-}ZJ9|@SO6zntAlt%4UvM5vSAN=K zFWJza1%I2LC*ZyRR>tR*%lEf-%lEHfw)S02kV8{SRVz=#LwUI52^V{w;3XZqsLG#X zvI*{ZHEnAt3G}1doKLh-+bD-D`|NseS8Ej6`6+VHl;Yaq*`(+wGgu*t+O5p{LjGE# zBUgl+%H1eF`33D;Q?NmJ|28fvV!Cfv>(*78Tz`_6gF_FM<33~#ZDoD;w&Z1vRyQl1d=G31t;XB z@qcAeSg!?u5Sl;*ClaW9YLMCvWc?{&3lH#qTEO^g#oI@yV(wlXDFqqCb9hFY=0@n z%MIk~nmzzb=-_6`%s+gCU~zAUB4??PzI7$F;Iqok#r2~*cW?gn=RX|X{pjY6EJ;NJ zWW$N7HVoB2EI3aum!_MBB#72)W7cG`w8EWh@y@t=T5vF-g^>fRc6PKHiaRkOLmfDe zb-(0mPbvhV1wALL-WRLEp-jv;K7Wc19KxquWd!WnOWzYA2Q36*0PrP6!DN)t3IM{c z<{~`0+Y@dYSvLskk&9Ni3VO6|DNZ)EK~HZVd+N;Je1@smvuDjzi}=O37l(H4>|Ez^ z_YOOkd$&Kz<6K&_D-DO=0nn*6wW^tSCZx>t^T?stzBjPP=`FH=8A|Mw7@#rGu{Y5la^s>`L{j=0DhymZ zde+-+MIKzh@_CkFWoX|uwgXHFjmfGv3@7+aTel_MsorKQ;+}3eFEN=p)5LN&Suj&) z8oz92`1;YkJ0Fsjy>;^_lYf<^EjplkFJZf2P3ZU@yB7h`D z8k$1t0c)nwAR;pZgB~~$rKc5cSua{T^Gg8|Q0&a?h0ERW=WXLx*?*kiHFWRH<^*Yz zH|MQ$Hs{N?9BMG8>=aer^oV2Owj(t|gYIe79^kGDpdjv#BvaBof@-^~rnP_3sORY0 zSlmc1&AL|vO5f94xz7c*NBr!#cTs(&Jj9f|dub=TYBkjI2W|Ob`h@Y#xByi7x%xac zNLb(lb$gCc;tmf=!+&L>e+*A-um9e@pmiEH^h=*n{#RE0MFVfs`}-&@>D)fNg~I#o z!;iSS!}Va4f5bdQ9N~=1k}KOS1THN2pRzsh7cFG5PXx{;*^4`F`lVU{SQN4Yx(99_ zemoJ<6TVy`I}S`6w*$VX6<#nT6hL}$75dP7bDQ%uE@|(&foh$_i2j1D$X|#NeVhjUI zA#=cdnbHPu8Q5DEw`q`jg#T)pS2AJ2+nsS6(P@{=P*WPRh7LRnvPrWqM{SuF(4J;EtEa z>y}Kzb7wER@={g}r8&Ev_i`(iSTM50Ri=&)!_AEw^RqISZXdusbYjN6M`<%vMRP*? zvH34)r;lpjh|L1e6+T-~f{NVvJhO#ZtyXZ|p34fry0z7a{M^i(+5T(<<=e2zX zKJ@(}a5pGlF;Ci|SHR;*>V}>$d|DtN&ISrP)@u~R!QC7aEj}52c%Zs_qBaMx3OpMk zp+ET=`mk{$B)#+K;Nz|gmAS&5QK?1}T?AKR3H9BaUw;(Npc(c;x|p(x>FgP{5lRgY_~WvJXZk<;bEuz-b}M5JS(Y z8(l|-S~CA(`;^M`PC@`OWdWZ_cR!8%Z{yxef`4X}xt-|l1p1j4BNB^pNv>?MeSzdl z60!5R+9O&CQ`u93`?$VhLSC`abh4urFg5QW;JjCyzlsD49g8{GDeaVxD6gzE^rQ|E?sx}au2NGvL2`+eNJ0!NvF4R8vM#rNyxW@Hbl&z2DPm1T%&cw ztkt6O!59~yICNB>___yOwfb(I(`<;Egy-lE?p09m=w*U}w_ZU|P=EF-o^*e!cYki~ z?ZYEZD88jLR}Zw>>b!zj%zYn%pGR8PAmAKA`UP0zOXFakAwhTEGI2XixIj%29xNXj`H>6#a z_9ljMsXZ4+prK(VA?XQ0!NcMq(|=V8zz}TASpV`*fBpGi&K55Cm%sdZLfZlE4qviF z-VUtCz!@`r(W-^*qi~m^X6&UJ5id03DA$8V$Bc7DHJx74ARmnG_3y)jQE*(%Vk~oY zc1;0ghmy`Hd$xHC!9N?@kAMNTo%TXw>8@}P^y62GZ$rBBr;+C4Bvp2l1b-()y&5LH zi>vfN>OFjhT(xMpL{q48@qpxv`?hn|stkz>SLRA7d^WME7;0Q-`BhWjn=EbDqam6q znK>bT`I4TjKK)A08m!l7=jcb!8Z4N5o3p0^EHT>lNN>if zoU}P*~rq8ip*Y&xH9bg|ZB1rm`|dIn)&N%(I{(M0tmZU-=lDW%yO zlvza#py5)x=)1u;)TCkbFzDc5FtL;L+W?x3leyCxhdNHz(%f zbF-;t#UrLL=D5&|E`R8Yt}2V)v{N@VPghxPVtcME)PAq-yLL+9Ve#;=_>7!dCMgAw ze5$_Z^4HLLU>rL62K^3lNVIn)r97W~&QBvo?j_Y!6+sm9;l2W_F57Z?e^&zCPwsUb zu`t7l;u+51m?Y9?!!R|fAkkGT%?n0i?6FWH;K2m#69u?;e3xB?uzf9@8uW(ISwhSm;Q_js8fFbjLY|2Q!vN);edEnN-+;^CFrMm zng6IkW`oEA|BavEbZcp*&)t1o$V^geitif1pK*&3t`?264*8Y=c^GoSw0=$NiepQ^ z5bXzsRya{IB!BPHVZo)~iZu=GEORh|TKtzmIv5A~Jw^-n+4d`9W`9VMW7eQzY`7`1 zbNv41%4BYdCWqVzzoq>qOf`2=aNUIt^&VS93$Sj1z&$L!VdZ`XFIvYeuCWHO)F=1` zvsAHpVuyhLAIaLDTAj=plXP}IFzrBUbZT#FG$FWo$bU5MeQR)@r3TGy$ekevXH75Q zdSSL@f+Q*`g^iHMg-#OdCbV#D$qrPNnh9s~6 zp-v##Re$1cQ%QR-N_58C+4q+EqNd})^&<*ahcz{If(>c|Qq4vTcIp9v8y zzTXuX>cEHLuy}N83n~>zK4H;Ya+7uFHHikKm4m+mH^HKaHdA$EsjQ|7d`bb0&vHpO zJRK`HT7%mCEmenrP9q}aSo&XchKNMyIgTeHcz-?#I7tHl`2OWV(kLfZ;tb)dyTgE^p*N=$J`j^8 zO>0jtW*L=byJ{Cg+Z>vT=jzpygzZ;63V*%1@Zd!Hcn38tE9Ktuke{}}Q(E9ZK5G`W zMHXe%rl2W6kAHzS44obZwK8IvSzc@2yrki{g#!8egZ8WmqB>GVs6K13`;!HOEsu8yBpbiWzs zqN~OOg0xtt!-7yVZW_;KCtJZf=5W<^c=i$%0#2%1t=aVB{Cliu+a8Q6LKstuR(NFg zy5zpF%)0QAlZkWfl&>m~bG{pvoqvo*A|vWhR`SDrV;gH~T4IfuXhO^~InGf3M z14DbIml(UD5uFhusefE2@1wgnCakvAW`Zp`Q=d@y2)5#IT=(gW)UtdJ)o`-dC4u-P zf2D^f?s>Vqw5$WD!X(*l8a^w}Ym;kAVFYaAJafZXhDHkBi2m(c<>=3~gOEyGlsa`h z!3lTl%%UvBsZ_R;qJL>acNXvG_H+i??%9=@fG&;L2Y&_=3GpS%9l-I}!xz26NRLUX zM>{EUj~4V}l~1s{gOKZv8rf?D5XM3VKU%x~hD@k`mf~Oi`R|Ct!L64`9Nc~di37dZ zS3EHO?(J+5=wjAO{-G3w8j6pcIs# zL8SN^zm$R%`V8h1w6y50PF1tT*4_1K>z?615GoT6RvcbbuV1fO?ckCyMRh z*>`40p@(TX(Zl*C2?{Zp{mVYe(@ZSa6g||cqY!Ubsqvi-qwOh84aB@Ge(`eq!7>rQPVeMyF)6&&Oi1i=IJHB&$4 zC(gaXz@l@t1@?ex(vTi`ST6Rc)`_B+a5WynE>4AWv>9cM6`(yKXJMD(4VL&CVXwPU zokC{3zKed~OnxMYCsOT3M&YNl(+&l2sWg5DGK&Lwg)65}xrWhtwG7kdV)?k}HlDQM zE}>{HWMSLMkQmSw=!UPVU4PkIp7SUJ4-*#UZ{gSAQ4Bdi(2xxK=xK z<$H69CPscX8BdtbE8cUScXiz7!=ySoYE3g~l-!JHKcEhQRtLfd^g8?`s;;1al?7xpCwma1<)X2O?aXAFU=Xr3OayVUWQAfPy}aT|M1>FZ za}f#=ZqgbgQ`h@yL7|KWIffY_6bflnZ@5^Ue9Q_}p?`;Wa`2dw@XsNv7jUKmtQg*tM$8n&=3nYko#Zje<@b$m=f+Ms?hLr$poNS^4p$ip(>u-4Vf%5M~DES~6 z?(P#Qv-g3oWZBTlv0li{G1Il}xVRxzO=)?#qO4nA$bS?z6%q*!!O-~n?1R;mM?RB@ON=#R$!t;$14Qjf_ zR^&rQKzlzzV$M7m zlS@!qwFoH|J|aOrdZEY*pSPHZWM14Hn%B-!6n_c-;W-ZI)+r9?V&VE9o(I?e_~`D@ z(GN#AKe|o-x_9qPxV~P}*{3IkFs4g*`|uXeA^bz}(9F8XvZ9}NpIMv`iE=>*<8(~A z!GI2W)s->j+n+U};TAswN_1Q*Yy0#%Llg6FJ8l=2Xby1-UONcfFl4C0@4ot-#Atykjt74S%=Pwp zS!)VgAbhuf;zp2ZY->31%EwZpLw*2i+YQGBJbR6|55bx>Bd0%P;$hR zj0_ob<%!i%qc&j~oEXfMGCwLmf+=NQ@Z2?-2QFMz-@|lD$EcZ{_uI}FK$MdK=aYz- zbyl#HsP+GzKS&zfp5F<@d$=-HOqF3Uj}LVoOmY2{_uU>8UzWD`yJp%BWK6&9+JBX$ zV>s*?=0V>7=-$WoZcK{5Z7E9ry8ZFE%YKoM=xBFEJ1@Sg5E@><72dmfL$u~N2>F}> zDY{trGYa&7%znM!w=JDcx?cLYizu=j-Mf1Pfdr8{5KEd0!mW9-2S&ajmXm$2r?i)C zPls(RR8kF=IbdJC(Sseg$;whk_OP}75a)zBvbZ>fGr9B&z#7NaQ*J`Q}- z>CTtgX~$~z!d;tIRwi?hr=6p2>-Dji2qr^c7N(oQEtY0o^|Fc+36aZc&7f^s^Jdjn zO@P*mhxTdQNS`sxZeb++T$eJNqudz=bTB570jiiu&f+oaSdzaf&8&M#SbxOmXC1WT zDMrc6QYFLbKth2~F1T+yON&lSFFs}b;B05YMxw!JMXfWyBEry%FbSRZ(#))TKk{uP zy#H^1prB1<{R5@)n6D_cv=asOd9d)#NG>9)Ci;kR{h$>~D-GCkrkmVnBG_kc=NeK-e{GKqB_U?kK@a zcr!buTt&VXtUF|SFg{VR3vhOu4%$^DG=8;-9IpUx3Ca&VUfC<2N2E)(ljZ4=2~%GH zuaPe~#xmqNXP8|xg8m@Ea5kdd86FyyS2>((goD6pf@Aglj3UT71b>H5Ed2)Xf@(k6 z$o9$P&>aPiEHVALxy{>GKz`!Xpg&&gc@%Qe%cks%1d1dbm~H>8Oih(;N0n$LLB%AX zn0ZPo5M8`Y5Qiixfv!EtIm0|?<=$#Jjvmo5GgfDJNOkw>&F|8(tbru{Bo6gXrvL}* zlxTz^9f95+S0-tvc7JmA__?`Z!Dxw?j@NC!By(+F2D#jOihP!Xot(`-Vl*H8$&_yA z%SXDTZAm}`$Ye9Bg0IliMq;y+MD*h_JuSd|5gOEzW^CH+pZg#?aeo@ylTOabQA4x?$+3Es z$0SJO(Zo8JVy98yom$p9)M)|)N%vqx-%93Krem2dO?Ihb`82CT3`fh%12ou^MDZma z=pA+l{gDjhkO#yk2t0C!8!7iHMSq`+`lIQ&@J?!a8+U$I3T51T9YD2*23}@fofX(o zvIrNRR_}M+zJD3%N}L2YW!c3+9WIds2n}khnbr2iyn2>Zrb1RD%L>pj;z%V*eegV5 zGnbK@bhcSzhFR>{&XgiJdtW?}z+*?NA=!8(Yx4M3i{|guGdUW`$9(#GxgbjAF|WcG{b0u(;MoHlTyru3&z z5~PfB_J2&B;AlRPDu@rqT~xB$e^bhB+90WWwQ(a9k*fkStS%9BhR^iT&C1aLTAt5rlBy#siI z%S(kHq4U;O&pZiC2G*PjSq`Qs3`;U~t!R~OTYrLSapc-Si_2m&pdn%F?emQdgmo^9 zcpe^?V-dtAomT0IuH}?55vXz#)xzff!?@<^i_mERN(YiJRp2~@kbI^??>jO(vT$ct zw1}NXZH+|36Fp2j^?;Xg6KCw-6Jdv(5XN{Z{g+B94 zdw<}lAq`z3p*JZ`BN|3Tni8FSZb!??3gIZTBChCS0eeOUJ#&#IVYG7zjN^k7M%v>X zr8>+bWR!BIgHLhsc~X9zIJ!$I(Fq%orn}M^(({m~&nI5fy_2Rw^ka@2nKHx9w`_vQ zkB-Qp&pj+Y*FB5Ouqe0x8at6ee)WQhHh(+Wdm#3K(drdNvzQY-&lnR{vD&6`aubd4 zAYwM>W^c}sgkRDrZM);*vr_ag65j8fEXzZ-BMt+dqIIiwfC>>!lDLA^mw8$CE_neG+^07QYS>BnY4M}BNbOMx!XmR4w+Td~`b$7+KeD z|0P@NBk2NV-R_<)e?o5K;)>4ac7J~oK7pcz(~LpWWscFMaqsOW9BXP&f0~ zJAAiu!xPF{DjiUg2bv6M(kPWjN%A;KZ1mfI=v(%t&dc2SB4XN~(_%`)pnrEy(2;Y$ zsCs>aPkJtkc7dy>&!OjW`@W+T_0wy}FR$q%^f7ln#vfBC*I6ZIm^nq9^l7)1nz2{% z#_gApH$Hp?^2Tlb+7sV>=4}US;})|v-l+eP9-GfjrzB%!u5gD%mT}^bP+7NtLa?T~ z=L~y1%9U}ss-pgCo=@W$o_}O;Ftat;JS~!h`2rJ$mkK2TzE4UcTz*N*BEI60)jx$Y zx7r8#DNRWUs#9etukFYqH9ZVuC*1V*JcmgWxTS5L*kNR%67W(~`MzINQliVYoKSsf z4@}c9F>*>FMf;9ji-!WtRN?Ie+?Q3hKI#=@@nt}Qg1Q$*)oELrQ_X8WPh~xecU(Irn3iZ|MH}s zmvMPw(BI$dW6*e>kjq1-*E(E^4Duf*`PK7RLqFC~f5r`Iwshij6{MQYfk}%Dr@iH- zFP1~2vR&NK=V1CULkHOr{XdMf`|#$t)(}|Yqxd#>r=cl?$vsl9zF%m$SNeH5=f9-j zR}O7T^63j30)MeQH$qqqV{J;Qyva8GX~@eLs^j#TI7LQE?-E}s`z4Mf%L9cdgG1AD7O8BG9Ls2k_{c4W!up{lagv_W`EN5-{p>6F)Z}sn4lz8FJ9SY zg|r0b|6-JaB&U@yRq!)|00FoET0`jA=@dgvUxn5Ygu==|ZoOhF{%f+8gHAaGuo3|_ zZ{!P9WdcZYX1ZC>>!bzsCbK*)Yp)U&0aaIQQ6GnNdfe>4pfJj}p}5-+#7odR7#iBl z{1+2LDt`!zM98#C)0n#Sm6fZLfr|EjbYW>&r_&9SVbnWnXxXa`C{qbfI3l`6THoug zTD5c{OddFY0;dPJOu4F%k}rFu*ykN{Bc04Z9s)QqQ>_fygKw%tv>|)a8BVRogR&pc zz;g^yOlMEY^QNH`Wnq)iRpOaLsWgP~<23N6p?|GVU043=&`*S6j8SoPJ1S8fqOakG zVZK~s`$9-CQYjmNDV2Uj4dC5{j*vYI*~TM>EGuczsaZ6wBmd1nKwki&d#f6desZZD z^P9-u1%7hqo^QzS4Ohqv>h8&2Hb?;rd2&&{x7svM=M09S=e}xy_242lqKi?#k#)i> zD}Q0xXG&w@(Wk`?(t01>WhACcK}3_-+`c*qh3` zb<~vIf#)rsP+#(z3fT@p0$rgHily4`vHQLYavi1YTt>X+>g|o^wq^(2UnXMFvvo0Tuu0!YrQ? zstQ?sh}+4KxF*z9ZHMG=?`hJAPcc?f7>ku9#{XRm1|EDK=76VcAYbH`S(>pXet%C% zULW2}c|u_@6SFWQXa-C1h(cK7mYg}VrTwPu`>I(i&59qLydEs#ZFh=i)-Z(tj34Ob zI_3Zkon8)p`JJ1^((+O)?R3_z%#2k+vzg#*3zASvvX~ZSuS_^Is;UVOu zOeUu;_~Awc3=>$2514_2pmQaF>Td1cMSpcBBs8EOPYC>+(Wphj?)pmtB7Y_ogG??( zs+JTR%>Xz!KK zk>yVb(eqf5pm!OTEZdezf^jo-oCt#<0J3?`tt8cv?`+j9fu#S>EvuiGKL#XaXL8HA z$&JuymKf^EGHEgjp1x&1P=8FDr&f{ip!`=0A5Q6(E&luP({_A!=*P>p=E%9wD10jUZ z|8;vz(e?I!WQs1X)5buZu44f*RNACMS4)snc)(3TK?mTNJRBP^mVfPw4Qua6b*^Rx z;{DhOQa@*Vxk4svTm7t7rX?=pT!n4}B4}t@lsFCR>x;B(E&_^Zo~qIWSL7m}N`HtH9cA$HD$Ap5OgD=! zQCaxzgjdjYmy@2;EBLM&3n>iqd7cyg8a@8Ew_)j3^3IvDKJoj0olIfxW!}P`{rtP= zOd(U}0ECzo>#9zM(wq@{O>~M*+S@)u{wjLE$yhBjYpWn--K8YN&}W)wD%~XH1HoAV zV9DBEUil7B_kTKKBv6-gyJ z!g6J*n=m&ptFP=-gR$4~u{_m=#X0zXCG^N0sedc-K%AnXQ6@4Trw3dkH1MTFUCE?{ zNbH=9xih~2Q+N7?`Wlni>f+0GD9up!`Sbn91N{zgntwY+u?vwif+Q z83;;8hmyEQXMGn2hiI|z1R_&@c)2vIb%7B9$4VD_#H14`r@P`<*g}*hi^jB@6e3OR zbmUdUCV$N7p+vjbA@#bxhN$Q*uB!3y6NM78$OET6_*iIyDMu~Q3O-fCGil%F)bPO< zi-wPr1u;mcWz-E1l>&Yhm5RDr>DU~`fmU6q>Srzvw)eWo+=(iXJn=^%70{5NNr&2J zYNI@q_LxTxWbGOGo*frCou2(TRZSsexdf}C?0@iL`=X_-%y9ToJN?R7@<(SOvBg|q z#sf&acpis>-Ox|Rh#a*UQ6_h1Vk23Phh4iOzdxHKdfI5Ve`B8l zCuh1J`8~-{S_zq|2D46i^t9L;mw8r%vRB3l$;e2)XNR+0_Y|XyRMqQ2vHxL|_Iq~C ztJWienD%a&z&Z0F*n4)d+#;^gd-SA%(SNLtJcgJulrSxJ+yU_F5ke<%JSo{t!l>13 z%QX5Cz*V-L(E4&AVUwgyOZM5WT}Nun%!23XRv-+~^@|p{xX-9C`irfCY=2e=Zd&t- zaxc8UpR_|S!oC7ch<&@NtvQd2)ur63vvyAD^SH|UOa{Q^0S!qrPyq}qUS*rP<$vKv zq2!GvQfr)6S0;J$Pf(_Wez8kS@d-Edx;9>wBr|p9hoWS zP;Os1@X>O1Yl8#|RzI6|m;kV{n}25V-gA|N4&??0y{xv+S&to3ar-9yTpgP{n$Y9f zt>w~GSfD?xMw4Pa*Hz|B_2+f)@)i@d@)w9Yy2sog({9FN1SiD?f&;4jEe!f7p)(1D z2QU1`yGI5v1>SEaD@DfBYivL&hN6c;f=>Ep)q7rYZKDYdf~U3q{3b0@{eRmZXoVDG z5*KS!h0p3HC`s*F%2`G564e9#{dw{SUnlmpx_lNXNQ8`%fQ$(uHPHPdjk z=MXDwj>c1===D6e@ah<^NA@XMudfHKlw>bGi2#LT+WW(bf}861`KISyKf3qf?HiK_ zMf8|T)h4!MVT$prxY5jRlYb0*+rDUQx4^cE?Dm`z4>KGN+L2zRIT|$qlV!`co0e_c^k-W`}n{4&;6>ngARizic7Qhrdp@YIYKj{teH9N<=4tX`WGJg@VT(y0s94YfW zoz@AaL$5Q+nZ1A4su@hYR*~@9zwF@E@jnlBfcY$%t3{BuV=dV!zcRAk!?<5G<896M zA?lHYVRa&rFTI!7VVu6bPs6ko*0C@8r7aR^mv+vNd`%gACiiyt*3k`K2*kh)5^!rw zRfM2~%ge-7JOUI~ZGR@{Oy;q8bE$^V6>eW_01$i+uTfOd6c&QeI9C_-dycrFE>Gcg z;U~kaZO0*o{C^|@J&6ydbF9LHq3_LgC~@#JDC$X{KijI(X?Wit1xg8g&#sC#P^RH7 zV`bH`peo|(>;*v9>hiSbRh%`SX+6xwE0)OFJmu%u)w(ui27le;eTpcMu_~=|gB#_N z+VH*vnS?NNCtHS?mO=xkpo3Fs z;i9vYkYgU3!ApRDY#2(LseG#?*t)J%>MYb}ofN0J27pc{S7}6DFz;$UgYu}%i(_!v z&|yXMtxu!}*njabK2h4L%8H8~IZGE&f1L+3CrZ8kaAg9xHNrK)}BzN5E{CUC84HM z)3Z!S(1(&gI**?98n<}gWk48`HX#(L4HVkDR=5SfN{?R0h_!U_B@g6~YWBxfk-$9~z-goXsM zZx#cW>us~Kb-P|G?{G9{)+Mt$W%Q&Nkj4)vUBQRaMq&~ky^CL%C*+zzO9|sv#n7qF zYKQUbUgp#W4ZUFap75li6w~H=lJ%hceGnc?;eT<@098P$zpU5fn}kmgTHa91+xo}4 z?L1KuiJEO@j7tGNZNUO746wJcmn?%muqqPI z{4|Uj&>RE!sZx1~SP<5!Kw4+i)P|?=M&Zm~tdo)+VG@cW9N{CkGd@TTV^#ZjiRa1Y zMJ9QvQD1+z<$gmROGMYt5nm7n3qkIvEKs&QYa2!&V#E>G>5E@Wg7mF7ec(3j48Y5? zWZAAWW$M0fm!^sXeU)vf%qVqXSE_=BeFYtIX#@&opLGfl8}#x|(Kei1N)iG_4?K&| zAEXjXF1~yZ_xncG%S8YGJ-axC3S-klur1Gy_Y;4kY8}Os&RNDJ+G8_7`74oy(xMX6 zcoX~20=>D>_s7S0F}_|DGtQh)g2hwt0+g7>?7a5L}c65JQmwm(YTb;7Us+a7s`xkRzIWJ+}nM82S zcTZ9LtiZ*NZ7S7Mn3rMhcRtN>nZq_c#)VgXD~~#kmX) zU^regRtSL z1XgF!F{h<3d)}O#Epslzk5F*RH_8GC@V3)&@3VGAcVCc-syZy=R3Z`uEEL{3hsAH{ zWJ(_~-Z~kxxB}Czse&Ba|LoD+X#Dt8eBK7V#wK;gUb$RflgvYeVL;hyR?X*wn+TDY zuA`wRE2DB)VtDsd5RCKGq*#(9{Pmjl2SA|K$F@} zjUPu@sn{#79@%tE*Ld8II*MQ?X{RNXIs6rkrkT+mXURe+lLkQBNF3i=0mgqMF=k&r z_+b0T0}Qs7@+`g6>zDd*#ySyDHZf?BRvAA?_@l@j&%qO&fzFhP!b~J=%|sO>h;942 z@q&*|Bf_t!m*FIE%ceJpL^z%?YiI?jLy&RY+NyWM6sVBWCcv`P6KpD=8xM;w8ty=e z_|fU1PXbTop=*`%EP2*RjW&NB*OM&0Dk!n-al4$@(;MM&=CV!l3JMeGR>=lB`)Bej zUsO6GcC{C$E7xk-_Z&s_9C$f zB}S(kM|OeE@DU+lfBXD~wq043sn#t|(e-K`V?(l5^oY)fe=XGL+nayZdSoC(yh}M; z&~Y(clSz-9b`u(a(VaPl(X@?(bA3Aq5`wiIvFO*!rG-Xl-2&qX{ardCH}qWNqnHS) z`kFn`HGUh+ly>f*2RRcDw>&&QIary5V41P`Yii(1yB9kHLsV4}#xwfn|alw`wUj zVt2Fsb3gF{kt;YJ%b|i(bJmM-;)c>lsoMtaRKEFD!}beCino6<%lyG7B!MEV$@7KE z{QpNoM(z`ZESF||V!qTH+5gvHlD&C~2cMHqtJ`BnH3<1Jb)yK=$ru%soLaOjK!@ff z(;RfPx}!jfd&VUkWZCoFn2UCk`>i2<4reH;IyQUel93$fv2ud)}eOu&MOo0J+hvlOvaPa2k&I$sPDl> zKfPc1%HO+_;pPrFO^VVPn~O|wW_?mvXyQ5QAsR-uco3_Ln2~6^?LVSZJ%l-W#j>sa zXk3A|AyyjYP16p*`X__qTv!4s$phvTN!f`<>T=*+HN$_f!j@C6ZjdT-?4|`*hkiJ| z?Szm~P%+vd*>uW>!c@JoHtL~r21JV6bukR(guCZrZ7!CL5h{aM`LW>DL^>keGV*b- zp<%Bzr47x_ymc$lHWqtrrzOq1#8goNm8@EM9QzVa{sl-}W)mt4WT z1{Ue@%Q=6E6-UmZvW}oyA+bT9ogpRLf8KW!`@uw`ICKWB)LDeuN=AeK`e~q(i}O3J zM*x0z+Uf;^1Xw_YnH%C8`elR0^m?hYW`tzNkyoYK*+Ub0$x@!X&V3;yB3z(Uc+G^- zWTqF*?qEAc4HYIRaDfozs;D8b25yI^Sg`g|7ZiWEJ&8()1GZyWILnrDqd;7$ZeV;; zO5oQsmlU))XQ5ZGI7n_PW=_aSzG8(Wrgl`dk?AAx1Pku?cx{W%x*wl*)neI0<~+)u z%UDgft{N=!qUvfsSM*t!J9;DPxN)-XOwrNy({z5?wKDsg^&XycMW+UtV;ZI>I*~aH zH_;SehGK6M(aRpK zo3i8MfYzZ&%Ip=y|ZB?T~loDmL5c{r;J?JU_W+`?YV>)5_htdO$io~{1X zu|tByJ|Qr-f&tms!T^WKiuN@f=oevzQt`X5eg{g&_Iatu<1gv3&B&TBi!aF2)$V^% zxJQrS36hRbSuZ)4gQ+&bk3Uj6D^wBDAK_MSCqS1 zge8}-Z>I>HpqKe|+qCPpJ}w^0H0ewm^xhrN=KAIK1?EHB&S-I?SEQdB&5Ua@!^kK) zx&oU(^W3mQ)=j(jAbqz*tzH7hq70ZI&F&?llCA@H#*5giPN#@XD17Gb5e|P%J@%u% z7b{aU`^eRvbJ8QXR>t@lhITL^2zE#{@~x zr1NJqxD-`Jl+e)pKP*0HC)R&Dq2_i6zlbGO zDE^5$9`qi>@pPsC@u#8fKY7!8cSeO!S>BpoW!xBYHHBlkPcRtcV;j^Wu248+U}Gu| z&GN!U5`!}cL{g+mC2BBdlcm)Cem_CZqCC}h3%rTjkfX+>P9IkAp(KA(-pT-itm!lB z?7qqLnmu5wct`7GWceLF&5!iokoWu1$(f3HQTgZ+r~rPl=)kqy99PW!TZ}Mkc~&(9 zl0?fI)+{8319(soXX6RWeh}zruBar}xO-*Gj>~o)0fh&1u4c8eoz`8|g-RNd7g_Ky zaxH-~dnV&r#*|cB_=$f3!3|_BpLeC##AZ9O-aB6jV*mmj7r_o!sTz-EqA=!(68Eom z-~JqdACx{%#o4p{HUn=9H_YdV6={hCSX0%qO8d3@BDIU|weVu2p~OJynK{NE96;+3bvm z_c+y6+nIXe(JPq~9T|x^bbhuGtY6?hSb!QhO&Cwn@HU7g8zBAzc?OUXT{WUJ6#@(6d7 z1o^xV6P&x_p>uynTBXA$0 z96mAkM*vXUbUw=X9ShT;&Dnb_F}WX4R!Vdt+D0^F)$D)Spkp=}9Sxotz^s3MdDYAz zCMv3w7V6uwshp`rcLycNu9Ay^Dh%{=LhWLrg_po!i2{i61fSFSN$=IelVl1kUUXM% zLv1Y+^MWca?f4GZjP)?Bt8$lBL8~-s{fAj?GLsBFYaRtD{QL+lJ1icXg7s%SApoD* z^VC)^wTyqkUbvC;B$~-whN5_TXL7G7tm8%q*@4la@TdG9S+h_86T*`alVX0yP!g2I5?~$c!7cufo;m7jTRwuum>+4>{~)tR8ei!6Nsmgo`EA3e zg9A=EAX2%bGXU$algH`+j@Ji5&p}?zk_{98q(6TM++XBbM7~-<&tP}d=n{pyf3F!oArKAilcjX?jGE^cVm*0W5=NrXmAV9VRM*i z+X#Q@LLMmPUSzHAD3{Vm&6z7L%HEs@uf`f|4fHc(a5lBBrO=^3eYBck?DU?qb2&hg z>7bz&`s-=rBY8|K_(4uwvE=kaQO>@PCs3-jIs$E|q~NncGosUi9=ve1>8?=m_7Mxb zK3|BB)HoTT=FDTuQk6ln9CRosCQ<%jm_mP)Gm~j~E;#a;GMn_Q=M_Ki#<(s7Q?5{; zgbe*Ny;I4R^@~4lF+NX56 z8HYA~4Rlqxq=2;t0p#fJty?z=N-owzE%inrh*0dx7`Y9{r|c1JLpHMb1U%BA%D;b7 zk4-JM6O7_+$iJcIGh{Sg;4ZW7K(te^h-vAx8Bi-=C_JPT`2%2MnXw($& z1SL-9c`;eDfrIUV>_b%4A!5A%ZDfD$#H9R|q;HFmi7ib?QLc_Z@d?38nI3ybKg1%Y zCVDy3@zbX=A32Eog2iX1IaLq8@Vg7MOr_1d6Lc!gw%1xpC_youii;h7kIa8iBig~L z+(-UX4vkJ%5dew+&yy!+18W@!0zC}N9qHzTs<~@Ry2D=fou7BdTH3fYI~j(X2WW6o zJKsN#HV|-PvbuhRg0@gqf!=GecP1j3G7EnhtOSOWo(k3z&mve|Tt7<@A9?ZZ+c%JQP!@)oQ|v7C z+|s8#M5*O-9*2lZ1$vG-a}!ovQ8k)VIJpwtWpZSzPGrcZCyGPR5tlVP|N!J=)ne?diw%e;wX_FsRnPm1fA#D`+g zkv__6-YFp`CHuObwFDgeJTooGfBC8@{sxltDph|!qidi0Z#Oggnt8qH|-{9f^kbzx-JM_Sd7^frUymG`oC6Fm2^T|L3mESeiZ^j zjdPII364VWH8SP6Nnd~0O6&fTWV^>q$+HK$%)#&PzNA2<+zDGbd#V^z<(YVpAE{q zBpWCCYv+oiRzAVknHzrd_~x;iqq%ERyxEuzW zzGWf+_wtf9I{!IiW$QtSo+Axd)uIU+gYTY+&15)*VjF*D!NldCxg0P3yt&j~&&RRv z?brLgylNYdz?c+MIJMDSee^V2pH9Cs8hx+t2_H2rFFMhTiMU7*n%2 zT@?w*A0rQm4P`b5!kT#jh>)fjp3>PI7b) zU9p(_2aM$|m2Ag~b5mPnP3b;7kz9L*(Q0L-apAsub5&v+c9W>GneH6o} zO9=ZJ)o6wZM1MiD@%ZOFvnO(ftHO$!sgfhN0Ql6-_djUnopigNgMZwZRbZQ~RSJs} z5M^I;Fd6d`q`)i}J9io^0`}yUL+BAQT{t!hfS03HTD&I57Ru-sziY{i_Qh|Xl8Gh* z@Qr_cN?AYo`ycb34mq}}y`C3Q~1W9eSQ)iM=ayIVQE4ae>xw$C-b zQ{poY`^{Rb3^NWa$e6CGMsTA6+BZo7>V{eHR?}_3oA_yEWJ2_`Mu6cZq)!8ihgg4{ z4Zf!3fI$ilR$(drc{AJCW{?9Dqi8SJ{Y1kg4S&MkV?=NzS}xqkKemnNa>YOz%@TnJ zaxG;8DGGTxM%ZpD%7TD#?JWNQCMr$oWb|@zI9QFR#;cfKSWQ(5*l0{Gv&q-|tx0)` z2M@GT72dRrret**Q8XNvXaw9B;iG>nbRP#(#8C$CqVGSWhsv(H<}0m5Pu`y()lm3? zGK}Ka9VO+}B?y*OaJR?wlU(t+dD`4BJ|kbyu4^mW&aU_k|J386ol|CQi?1|qCiDKC z^>wH`X~nIZM<3o`LH0mY;oUDY4d~plr~_HCYz9ahIVv5JkU+FioyV8+QQ?1nof%4% zvIrHzSQBW6$PR#874)oH%+kz&q~D<3*L(RmHg4Xi=@&4u$_^*#TZ}J7Z?tWCZ;|LX zKy!}!mQsDUy|2ZI<4Z-zJa;DP?k6~V`TVTdtuIZu%Ul_sF(IS^MoxN8?w}{J*c;TWCyL49plTH()!bgD^M^a z`||Zd#kY=8nm*=zJhnyUMoN)|QX6)49NIVV<$XJpOE`0YU23iNu{`J+g*#OGL|{O> zny6cz1}r?I3Y$BI6!J%39fY_=X+Y2xZh+;|xNS-4cy|y3pFkFpQ6ztvV)xT#Fv$vH z5x4)`r>PRff=`5R?n|Jnghwl^`()f$TD;&M7B^f3-y%XxAz6rRdZlWi$=7oWGVkr1 zo9#cg!IwQlnZz4|803aqrDHRkpGTjEsc}EyR|u~a{VWl_;zpxPzDA&{Gz)LK=q>BY zi>N@$RmV}W;(-n;N-BS+Oy0m0Vds_3U2^l;N}76sLg{j)NY79j)v*gVR&3S@r`9M2$Z4tpo^XG|tp zFOQuM;dRwj91X&XQ2tEO2k?D#Q44{D0;8zf0{NPVDue<`Gk!%(r-Q;6;97OfWH=V= zCW}M&Xu+hq)Q0c5I4@G<%q#GIWu&V%o~x3mXLx}PL4Eon$<;aCVNzhe@ZI`Y5*?+) zp6upm$V#O-%%gvvYVwrK0eoTyFWa+2es}&9lN`sjCiqv5!)F8zspjOXp zXpxbgSph~yB;!#;X{GJVR@)vknHD4BUbF6vHe=ectpA99$@ur3bKE^Lvp|7JI8c4> zhAdP*Dl>n={rGu&k0lb70KmRR+Bu)Vky_{BvV5om*hQ?;mFUKS=SxiY)5FNrT7TR` zn^ReKWWn*B6{}STVtF?!1wZMUlqZJf?S(H_6EWPZ_{UPw#(lI}w+PP}c}hOd9%#UGv(Nob?=Mlvu@xpghPhY;H8eJn6k$bJEC2}siuQYWDtM&x7nUP>kofd zJrx-*!+Vt$ycj1Faq2_>uX~<uDMIFUzi1}!? zHETKwa?V2H4ks84xul1AY}zQ9QtFB1&jM-w+D{CeimTqM^aFSBjz-uueOv^&c{$%`P^?}HUj(!CiYYSE*QJ-0> zuZOc0Kwhe4yKSpxARNgrM1-d}!;!kJ*WLvOHS11a$Y|xi;aCI%_64Om|2BW5HDM)g zINF>euGcTw#s`OXPzy+~-Mh7XO?-%U;}!sGHlT0%5WD=k5o0teiLi=n=w2o5KiFn@ffKoFOjLN@7H+F0FsT4anGz)N7dx)Fe z_8UUvxfWP(8VQzSor4EpFW`S8Ii$VNZyNQtaw3SM&Bkv^ouXW*c1^$a>C7DG(znD! zDkK>E?X;YBqI57N&r9~Sf{b)!(lto~G~03zNqWU5i3vwwWf47!Yf=LU;lyU`c^IBw zr_*PJS(0SHLy z`CCNqVnL;SF%I&--Hdd|AY40D*-mjT)%jP>30FsT`O_Ts~XTQ~0G zNPYDIq@(##D&4i$Ngqp$6^A4@@*+N;`VaOi>ON<}d`?6$HDHi{S`#E_l^eM_jw0CX z{;zQ3Z_R#_AR%*(WWq)*q_OJH0||M0DzJx^j5*Y9^!VmR!cl*z3-JGiLPQhsgo>na zn(K4qekwd_f2fT8gi*37{H1J)tnwq;G|-E1bfb zq$jAV1X*ubm_pAJpyE8{TU=(yxiTiHOs^u&dGvXKA$Dy+*P1~4!-xP9+?1x>EYt!+ zz%OF?p0mJORtYGA`g^W1HGzQ8%M@3HuF3Y#L}AP>p`3r?Y5n(6c#OFJwRu%Y0vsPr z)cWwSG;`v^=wTHQyx?1lfx;9XbFB_H+ovx@y5Kzb2Ml!luF~_4QvkmdB)>4bqv*=2 zy=p_giw7(G;wvIqM9pa^p6esp%X=H{jS9_F?&jclHn}yHR*z8j=B00 zgY8&nQ$_@Wrg7jp`+yVv%v8`;xX?p1!-Tw>gcMM;agKJbuGS*BhT3UtFx8@20vM4! zgoOCKyetd(8W{2-!C&-DpZ#ZoSSS!QNal&8!{E(i#46&p6WCooZiMS(d|3@pL?fJSPj4vJhc% z^kfbDZWTXHgzKbK@OtXYT5-6oj72Ku-#ow5V(PMBW!oS4FhpB(~ z<%^A9Dhahj57xb|j6pzHLkS5;1&E{=!hDc=C-Ei5!BrY@;=Y@ZnxgA53S69~e7UkV zimhynJuPO6r0|XL5;IG-I&2z(HQx=A-&(6u3}=tx{HhD?SFTuA&H8;=56!rdCsp-% zZBMxq9{csues`)XCAs)Fx+{8CK{^texmNeu&RlD#);bG zXwTE{l+=RXcdrghx=%aeQZ!30$ddF0S3-BXHM{(yhz?bf4=t+I*p+{Z?J5H=Cs46u zViJX~fQPQu4UXwogh9Xl337C0Mv%f@;1@kWtLdiWcgg5Bj>l>JQmYYV|CJfiiMF6$UfnYB|H|3aF>Z}19e$U zA4&hA8+#GD2XB8NX&pizDO0*+axS&A5|X1YObk$FmBAwz5UWJl(N_}d7F~F&R;Z~6 zm094(WZY1?V08~g{&C$T#_~x zf?ykwIJoJZgl!cHwjD^hhSYqr6sb+QTUz88S`UEHloEqtTvWLa6Myu&?V)%A-e(?y ztV$DGRo$!gtg7MrKY_&U`oz7*&O(DVF-!6y(CSG+Wju~W9M{lKKe405qeLK2RWuo59DpE^-Awx2zG(@W*}9#=G~oe1(S zxw&P7Vm6%(5;nWRW}e@dL5I2z^1IynP_4#whA+Xmty=$EBt7Cp-;12dl4}>qlP@(- zW*=R@Te53MBLPn$qz(eytat+_!Bw{IH4-+P4rGC;~xi!5M?t*Su^w@wQqkgwIvARG_i#`qj*n}SZZg|pZ=BVrM>a| z@@R{x&P#%{rkE6;n?*5}XKwb4C{(J<<|!VuC8TV2Btf*{Fg`mb?&vk4xOCkDBVsWl zmT_Po9e-&6JTQ&w+#0gVZ2kGeJoAP9ysF`-QnuYP&oyMx(VbIX$F>!Z{BzO1c@R}>;ym{=RfZ9Re<-<$%H)w?A)5%VGoktjW`1cgav(631I-|l=4r-+>cFF zv%$kE#iC+SBG)efWrff7ABIKOJ#f;Y)K(*eCryea9-_8Cj02;rB z2jQpq{LRIYJG4~II=x1P+fxke${hz$nmhHR`%k4){v1mmif5}f7o8sDZr2HPo(;*~ z-pao?HWXyUKFK0QnT^6A_CG*SA$8 z^gh_r4Km18d&sgKhtb?*$@&voWkv{w?vJbvF$Vf@oAl4St`(vbojVanM_hBT0s;w!>UF~I>` zp9A7am10nA$dbBJ>}ya(=vG8>zx+t?868$y=8a|@_^diEJDwg=7AjavRC*^Xg*^g) zsG1gfgnZ29#w;!QCB=VlU!+E5E6{5@guFi&*8$V&krpkmC>7qhYKoDZMDn$O$8S_o z2>vqsAV8bqQNvmU98E&INKqDwcM*0;f>hxWlPD4t&=mh-nsgag$Bvx6(&_y7rMDrn z6tUEbmoW3-Vjgw%=d;0Y%GHjm%G8-KS?y_})koF0j&rw#u!(Io;v(&f^)mGK8%`OL4cv>&97`qiH z#kn}$3&6w;JJzw+4Dj`drj%d04g`Tt!&(omHP60+b~x%cwu7QkMAh;M^F#S$+$9A7jzJiwE`< zZMCza6dQI91d?MGO*6pi^Z?J>o=NJ6w0nQ#oyhilXT&K2)KYZ&F8NfrRkpkmyX$LI zCI3pWyZ(R3me?$1lwbHa?be%CJ9RS`eA%R+TDB#LPi$dC;{fI6Yu!ydoj$f}(Ugy_ zHP|#OOc?o(fX7kc?trLZ!C1Kzbl|tz7w$X242tfX*^RGSf?9w3ooi0!v;Q&{U3W42 zMbUgSBQoN~lVXEf^I!aXo}hX5q^M;h-+1c7N6&wMpKt&Q(us=Et-E5WWq;Mk2{*0t z!a0{t$9+cANw;pe{7ZQzzl>9{DRC>Zwq^uTQV#X>{`(&$K8(BG3p5F9{5$&y*NL;s zs#4VPvK{{bF@;`_S=<|wPxG;A z?0%WCDT*t#s>wD%X+WbMJdwT4J?v$u1amg=&{euB0TQW(or5KwDAz52IJy8xECZv= zN2;l#LZ>E<@Tz*ruYY$FT;qU=t%+63$u57XVW#v(SU?vLM|ZW~8`vMJFiOnp-fvYo z!hWj)SE*+l-p#yVbVkz&bcZ&})Ef3RSK|)=26eG?nYw^W=dKS`dQaZ~>vup^#eTZc zwB~T~oA#`k{n964r9Uu#(G?en!QdqLJ^rh9x$eKI5VzBG4$!*}HZ!p^3uS1GwQPU> z*5KSw8}A~imkx(&lbFXvmi$joap{yrOmi@jhHC^2<^9t)Bg_)i%qERmw0Y{Qz8q(XplPCggvRT{UZDxOp~ARL9kT@iQBXAa!1MP)=s5 z_$Ay_{EfVEdjIYnl|sa_8V7m&32k3jK08_Vc+&f~^-1+O$WsI`ND8G7+82M20`xiI z@0~vgZV>Orl3;~&l(e%-6>>#hbZ|B&siXR|u?}iIh`ev92moU_0A{>~SefGvOhso*~?zWaBeN;LlP!*v^GKm7gGgzsN}p*AgGcc{Ty zb2BH9*XYz+9ObT$1M)`CEmZqhR>$_Yy+)bpffHEz(REx~A&RG{$weXs)EgIBmEOfo zj{*&;vYSZ4tL$8#&OQ2|rNEU8``)(FO8C5T^J%Fq?0W;P$%BD?Pn&;9_q^inB%4k! zY}VFEbzAecc9@jj)a9A!cxhD7v}YfOc=c9NV5FMD<$C5!B7x5=c9d8|%hRX1#DsC2 zDSe};4F0WHcgCv!XLM21`DR`04L8+{k-bKrd#gvGwqcwaI6;Wl?`dCSx?Kz1xrAxU zn)-=OZ9fmqdF=YHekFhZ-U3H>f7XEOg5rTcm@Q>0+etSVJCzX#mSp_8VC9ID4Z-}C16rWw`MRC=p zGL2M3<_OVdLP2_J*@`FChK&ncY3&*-SwV%?BD#TqB(^1@u)u^nuc-)=(4-$*jG$dE>Go1x zpQ!qz+O_&r33`753${@_F#2Z^4pL2yTs>5*qleoh=sNsRqwUP$CCDp$K|1pZJa*nGP#x#U74%9!K0wL(O>PxCxr&hhV zF5&Eu;gMM10MZ=tw|Vl*;FleLg#ih8(@}7S=YXuAm*{^;Q+?A{@yfsya%KCt`o)_#*R9W z>0@KEmpOlGG8cR&)hDjB^14d%=1?}5I9PU~V6X#8rZM9yS@;}B9!Fe=_ZttoeX_@r zeyF*2^cPXbm7S-l%O)zMpjy5wIwlq))y%)+s6BtyVrjt(8%Bd^C-=iFQcwkefntR1 zA&%P#^z#?Qrva8LW=_ua$jcM^^MAcFC?x#v`sG#~+F!YDU*gc?*kzUUFMHBX3qG{1 zvhWAz2Bz4aRdw69Tb~R5#ud%%(=*pM4!izakXTn0d%O-qi*QoV-?Q!fIqF2up`+#C z4}X83-3Tww%2s{KPlizYhDZ~X)4LblTW((d`R0<{+mzRnI1&zOqG^i9jQj-2naa6b zHO^&Gd#6uk*ncP6l**i*x;sS8N<)z-_yMv;MrR30m&x^AqYUdyLmsMFoLDqaM?ddK zJ!TS)(gV5V;skw?@r#}(1q{M?DkVJq!=@YXGUK@-n0>p03zK}XemR{!)r8nGUbL6%6>V1EX zU$OaDo)w#I5OPnc4RK}7QF712%9;*y$0l)th`iYOEBfyq1;7Xdo&dB7xZvcsbZ>?} zbd4tapSkfl>Fz1seYfOt&05AKdAndxC4k4Gwov!VX!bKRRnZSqMI6Ccx>}WRf&}QI z3Q2)HB4TEypi^@W#%E64skI*pNF{%T8O+|A+moJl>S3)GexbXDeQ2gau8*URo*^;q zoAey8RFjGPwjR5P*Ob4uW1?NGyQ*x_=mU_cTEYAc=EETZ35;KB`U$<&9LU7EWnXxp zlIBR>6}9mvhaPP?rA-1W|3CY$3~IwSvx1xewblw9&WxAB7+f!E0|Q5|$g_XIg2}SC zZiLH{wZ!_b4oyQJ+1%{^9KRWxRVJmD(+Bq+oTzaR8`c850iC;0kI8nZmKFIYyKcV3 zsI-8WlT6c>MWePM{}Lc~DA6j5bwN6Ee=Dpb z5hU_ClT0D)S|v1;Jn>p6&F64kw+KvFL?2TrBSbAzPGiDid`u;?KskR(ER4#w?UrW7 zI=J$zkx{p7+5=yoqF&+^ff>pcy{DD^@v@DT&BLtss+j!k)KETcryV<(&o2LOsh(x9 z6_=@8XDf6CAfSg@6G-lbfe9=b$ISyT4N;pUA!#7CbPkM9ZkIB#cJCEXNI%O5f#>=>MnyHOK5l7frjzx?~ zC8nTZ)%JZjlynean9hm)UDoS^o9McdC`>u59RS{$jJ>kfBasq;=at)Y_+g&iKgDPoXew zE%wrEY%gn$*6lTdlzwIojDXra9|YhbSCR+ppG9glZyz_{tn&0F{9-p?(Mi@YaGsA+ zk1uIzYMH-f1S5ZE`=(;Yn)!SB&oJh4JM`aiK>g2e$!th*AimrlWpu^-O^iV2me4^N zPI2)yy6VRDQ+lfA^`hU>Roi;1{WER+KAfoqx=6_=B`P`{PYmt>KoARd|J2~;DuyrZ zxT#c>U=$INlX>#D&S9P*=v}qIwGX`Gcz%tnC+s8vi~E1uv8@grDM{z%kbt|WIb#YL z<(#$H6y}ij{6n#s3b*IRwAqoaiV;cjIUXJ>9R2Kmd|); zmr}BDslTnnL@T@F?LdpX&; z$je|&@a?_m^X2IiByf`m6?}W&eG0G1vwJ>soV$ zCwul5ZIFiAnfHcaxTXweZCCvP(jraN`Wl-GGV%Y8<=U(}x__Vq*3GO@>nb!TRl-GV zOKPX$gH<1{yT;>;Yarw)oFCvA*dgi-;ZQ1t!RY^>m~p7;N7JHNnX47WylX{`v98_D zYSn*BhT2C}*MQ6M_bY#zR<&wMUjFMjav?szM5s`Tw*TM-NkRSr+8+4&g|suGZ`^Yz z;D!kyHhDLZyvTT)s%B?CNZe5_JVpW=)!;>~&0Xb}X)F%dBc`N@df}PB&KyWrE`AMl zKlCMOpVtJcPMVvCtcLuJu0^vGMAR86@H2mMf&Tr9|9paQrCxz@PpMa>XIWRR{l$_S zneb(U_?0B#uVO-`E(j{F9%|QywLXibXJc0_Wu_GE$J)_|J!xxVf)<|2gR#`p+Bawn zXs!rIj_Z5l7-uC8YL%HbHE0r;9NQARiGMV$jg7x*m1%M$w9k2RI=SJE&0=2ye6xQq zgp6B2fii^EqLjGhQk?`tbs9-Hh<||uGo7o^f#ks)RE!#4$)K`4n`!F?| zjEsD1X9u_GiKuFpDw+e-M6V#R`EtJATGZ8AOT=gjRqyym!*`6<(o&0ziv)i`)wJ?H;FoY7`y0+tk^{g%jk)1n($_)@9R!M();cmc9UY;t!>+ zVGA`$9HN-zNQ8QJgwsQ@{vSd3;MpvS z26-ZHJyvs-q^PS+rGgZ)!exJ#!+#-hNKw&OyvGm`PYl-+x37gOMsV&Fnk@v=a~Bs- zw(Geo0kfRCZiU%{xD>kJ4gS)H`b$WzB*s-j<2-`^-@W;9b7x`R^nuWm5^x?2{jx(+H$`^Hp9KUZ0k(N$jAm3oR@pA+hlUp>wIl_=q_ zeNbIF*3YuZm4BzBF2jG>a`~qq-Pp1-du~f}SR5!kstDwT6ikrqQic@Y@8cyBEsg4_ z-Q`>8oF=#c6jWizC z>eij&_@p@@-~=%_w08)vk=|U!qY!CtmYpyq2uKVEt~?owi5h>k+NiTB$tN77$b{)= z#%rZ`F5qSk0!9S*E?Vp58F*!H=nya^EgdBKle`k%;)LOJoz8_>2_9ZSWhNJ6aYdmf>G6*Jn$d=L0~ ziRQmNxLMTTp6c7D5`Hp#5Yd4!eG&cUS3CA!e*wr)h$K!sT>X>%_sE7UYNVru%Rui7 zkdi39;$UOMe{<%q6+)j3ly?UNRWlBdU7%xOG9w5;O|kGsQtzLCWd5!A>kEI(FFIdJ zrP_&6XJ1tYqTN@{@%`yEv5ukYO)+5K$x-Xa+*UBfRgY8~tNYUO3@}Z< zZ4tAYs5YJL9MR2w0NSmeM3I&;kY;L25TDM?!sx?cROzk~clLJ>a|xityP$x6BKl42 z2=Pzce5pXRRS-UZEZ$I5JKsY*Ztabfeo8;!i+(`dWTQCBKN*!YYguHr5gfQ0^viz} zA4MkO#5US1TZqz@%5t8>Altk!yvlO3eHG-IF)O+-dbgbC0ytfv!x5Cas0S2B0a1}d zlsYCfYtGu`Y~}$_w*k$R2r){}PT7?4FiM`0Z)Y-Nm`WOdgqj^)RE}VME=SXH6`VT0rs6w!qF&`UMDde} zXH5uqn&*dEF&ls|EsVcHusneHj8oM~qUBfwYPa?Be+VOo4n8?2U@aVJBYa3EH+#il z?(_R_w4)DylFDEp`x8XXs)qVlqwQotesu}W_a{gbz3x>FF*$U9itUi}Pm^3$4$GWo zN2y(1=pRNQ3nt;nXJo{!C_evjHybGp_s@ym5z`SB?WBWv`2tWtNYde(+ci0Oj;Mp1 zwL>z7drh|N6Qc{0C1*Kkj0YlSM`Q!#n)K&YJ9Z*}bd_+xjE0ND=lVq0$1lNlZi)`U z(MDjt;2F0Z!NrMoKsQiyP6lVGi(>@rK72(Fhu5AexM<16BUd#DfKAOLJ(Twg>lf5H zs`JI4PbafzY-pE>P+;o=gfz!5m7*JRUko4H7$A4tBl2F2Edn?%MDE3Jx(9j(tc|}M zndBUQ9}OQhG|){G=QgeHC-Y@9b))Zb`L4<Lhl?Iouo>8f>2bN6wLRrdc>q#p)9lf6M*xt&$^N6R zH$ijabANE0p*ZMJ#VuN6->ZCiLJ8U6Kxy_}xqedUc=dI9ydV?5@&uTHk_tVHsRTsZ zRcqk$ibdbnv6X98U{V7owz6Y0xt2SB7yVG`wtKNBF#^auY@pM7_itmDo!jq8&I@2@*1g^}&`X-*(lVzB2R_RcS^YbC;C`x8U*$gdV<6ofM?Pkz zgPWyax|!jV9Hj$MklkG+Xf>S_dX#H?$R&{DQoUhtY2t2rd^5JA@ zb7K~^yRDaU^hCi#^OqGGexfRWH=0JMF-3R}=7|yR1oAA~Rg@ya@ElxXpu25ubWkQ% z@W?(;b5Cyyzt0*8kUM_S2*40-`Y6>ZN#i1-QLskQ#>cz3L9c?>tm&eVTS($DfW*U? z?jSMnmgA1RWE8-kH0#>=2$D;1?)3iM4^C*o*cWBD8^*Zzo1(tx9i1hAL}DVe@6@S~ z++|;4G}!swA?3u#@V}At>!4e35{eK7Qi^uL!6Qiar|#ArZVe7JAJqkw_c`3VSAXXJ1pJ*ox` zN+#RM!sQ{8GVui`;9kEIQ;>PW@b^)7>F=3OCdi1;pH1u0f6cXjhA4k^mmL%s*5S$@ zNZ_&pP1YSR+$6a<`k@h%%+Y64uxL6x^~yzFx1|i$ePk2n8-GNjckEMXuxn%( zCv&vPh7}nk*jD(JbMDHS$R%MF3Z{U$r^s??ba;gz|N3OyVQ9H?j!mt8i9nJh^#n~< zH9dlKKMsi1YXlN8au)b4dnd~1LTW)`5frE;x0?W)1MXs1dAAT|JfvGo>*5(=AU2Gj-Mt$2_3&bd{!Vg0k>&Q zRhb3yktu6ZmE4^`#e8I1`seZ}!*?Q(q}MTr9BilB7MJ%nvG~QL-?u~ zWqi$^LZSM9^K2Vv;gVPo2)aNdJ6Kfvo55nSJIB(H(=?Os7k* zQ4B`VbB={7=z*UhSe@R#eMc5QT!|%2OroVK4={fy0fm+P51Zl@4Le^qmOVi}wRYbX z7yayWe}-fURw7}O^J{+LzMK6HjtKd_B<`?^ikzE&wdFI6!$oH-B+mZF)4RAHrymM4 z$;VBejKZA~ge7DUdVx+$WF=y*R-(1YU5v`Q-UuRxS$4iO#3zGi&IId^uAVnfCP>Lq zHn+)p%~AVe95kI+Rianen;&`4aR&n@10NL(VGhia36LjWAAJv%$yBR`1soF^Uu6_) z>3q(A$^Pj?zS)1@PyD&KDPTTMApGnJG!dO7D7>NS9XhRbOp%rW{bAbnNDR#k+@u-| z$i0_vS1sGi|Jjtjit8jJjmBw5h^}w5)sKdSOS*nN)ZyBj2{CZmDj@jAAB+A!Baq1t z-}K>fbPUf{M8S`~UrJ?ONX1+AbhlLS**p$^Dyv3JCpPGB$T{U=k;~i;DI?&d!J6r# z>voazGL`h&Ga_|uLQ3_!G#mhePlnspP~nPa3)BLY>n9doM_+u(QbN>4qf36G)+2v= zeNw{*YfW_{+8*ZX(s#Lh(bqXeUOw%Oq8Q z$kgL~@Zk1|G%6p5IAq%UV20Oeq4&ezXHSZ8#lCDh(c0CSg=V6Ej`S6rQT7V_a1g%y zN;I(7$5K@d6;;CEl(UQRjo3f#`0)fZ3NFe`mdDyKpE7-f$TMIavqhU4_k=ozITk7d z+=rCnbN;R(kq)myMZ$>rS0Ob2$)I6><__X4sH%V1p*|WGY6EaDMTz<`Ie~2c%qdE7 zem51(JeWpRj!(c4Nq^r~R>tEk;d9OCyqX6TeIsMEkKZs)=N|~MNZ{rD1~yU#$f625 zmsoBLUYQ_^x%x78uH^S(al@LXZdIYsnp50x1ocRJP(*T7%m_l==u|RK#p^MD3M6n@ zn~S|U@AyLRdtoW-aA&962&iF&*;Fs#kV^bdI>IFenmc+?D%FLP?Ah3-*urpwTa(>Kmml9kyX6AN5IhYMkLwhYC&gQY z%x4P`qDU#@yofByr5+*r1pa=1w!_6%SSpo(NDUletKi!)H!MCiMC@tb!|cJth-D7u zH*cEbG;6O8Q~V(C;f7KOyvCtJNrcp(UX4vEcJfU(VY zP{~wOGW?BAq>KP(<0}2TS%+m)Ly(9b%tRZ@s=8k_Jb{j#=U?xZ-jga#xf7hK&a~2C zyoak*)U0c4v&j5KSgoah;$T}&mlmJylNcFh%{G4NwKs!4T1`}k_+Y3nyn^GR1i!V`%z1;{-EpIOtlLk zaI*8U8vWc&rNS$sl;Zz6oL#GH2*BAQ*zr=HSt=@laSNMPfzc{Dxepk61f@kwCttD&iXI6%;V9Y0W%5588A zzsJtz3&KS0lP}WG-a>WQD5zUzOnG8&JLU|(fIi#=ZzIo_OFJj~0LD~YCe1Nt1qGxO zBae<21qT6l^-r!vXqL>_ow@xSj&9-K*kE%mBiD3p4gVj%SH2zFp+eEtNL8f(IP`mT zk{Ct;GE$Od(X@kqOKcn6bLx5v=Ax_4$=V_SXVL2{jk9ex6x~w)ArngZ*(X$rZtTSv zLq4B>lfgBk>Elj@l~^grlt>)|yi?_-yWRGS_>u`ZTd^xerDBe$1boK5#XxpWI3UJ? zPD53m4EeXs>_Xg7*YqzC05|F2AjC9=Rb#kA)~eQL|-3)eC)au`6`4| zX5m51fW~n0u-h!U3#n%Pad%FqD!e*?=Xx%joQlBPq5(Lm->5PidYs4RvVI(um4ceA zY5;(NZ|r#8^IgFF`hb984=$LVaehBv{*UGwooSzjh=Fro_|tRy!U5@XP(58~B&9}@ z)hIBSMDuNbDQnk+OK@#V5n>9~N(iOSFA-Yi#9S;COXbDFVZ5gHG-E9(A>QIf>8q|E z{(AS;-4i89awfmS;!4Xrhf){fGHXyC&J^&bm0jnkDvUu(zWSVet!EBnqjuPUJZTBPt#TvN53W&cdl3(EGoCXtN~j#9cte)zXN zFHG#`AO8L>Mj^mK;Mh}9X|69q<L93_HW~4Dpxc~G57S3N>&@Q>37GwqEDkC_hw}AGR zF@JgL|NiHYyZ3u`Is5YLqW1|wJ^R#u?#QfN`HaBLe&2TARLy$!DcPR=>=7)PFWk~! zb3Xp5u!j5%8drrdDyk;AUwJwxeocT4D4eT*{PDjZx()yMz7cW1icIoPEdSS^R7da?z|+Sptu42Jh#p>Z6K7KnJ=WvX9@!7#yFfuBU2BVEr0jPT73`Lg})5@NIWX;w?2!km63ByK8@n)0`fHvnlumH{S(v(Jed$@n+ z)hnA693e|qmpOhEe=)ZmB)RjnBX9-;s+ETC$oFCP@!^RT-b-m-yGGkir$4*TL^*)7 z3EC-lIvm>XhD3#{$4dXm(~H`_UG040vaN_ZnElcpOl@~Tm4n+S?0lVngS3$>6aE2z z;Gr^Tz?qfLt>y_qhr^$Jb~^5>0xdhd>2$HW#^whK)yMPD3Lb}@?zm0__Y4ap@kgI4 zUtfzGBS^36S?|xk)k>XV$?z~3L;MW}1xtTRs{UP75=8?eiEBMWgM)Gc&1>Zwn@2{r z3r@tetq?IoE=-WrZ5G9Uh#-}zjo1d|$=QN^3hI9N&lU8x7%Ly$`tsK7>6u^Ky*1Et zXWa!8YR#`7HEW*+olW!XEP2|E(+3}-kU}lwq{)hXu82aU`PI%jGX*5l=ZqWH0) z+&%<))4ED=MC2d?jR{Lm4Xfv4&GxOWo*(`$;7M!!FrNCrc2;$N{<0u<7hM4Vt5x`w zQq#wd3fD!qs0LF31H#isNXWeieA5IzdI1egmTuZu7*GvJ=OPgGraqOp42SIT9dJ!wDU$xSF?JP}&bRtQ_W=A^^#Y|~ifye+3)y-$FX)b(pU}o)q*=ss=(;gHIdjCBTiO6;yxE)_r#|@ZOf!>7ZZ!yl97!OLT9vVeT-TZf-?aA zo`_yP&=lv4o)XF%)2_^R7mN*==D?X!pU26GYl6_M3se$ZYXg5p`CI5AbJ|W;gev2x zl1?uYRYYokY|OAR1kH*OVlAgKYuuk$5a)b*Or5@gHc z$ikp{iTie})J+JNdDr)$%{lJZWdIVfc-S8Kz`j1G>5dRvK>FIi(#(e^X>TKQ^Ht?@ zH7MdtCZzMAzfW=l&%~QDG7@2yWKOm#K`Rhf95cgzR1Gj+!Mux}RctgNPw3ut&K#dE z|1Y1y>(8II5t4W-$Ciz3gJQb{UYU3>ky7K2zO+D|>VH;d0wHFJ%_K)RK@&{C+$L+i zq55G3u@sXeGAgj1<$A=bgQsy@vIa-fCj*WcK0kuPusn)*K# zzW(}uD8B=n*fwqip^o<;IWRhb#2uk8GxY_wh%OKc$2ZVUwC{IFa>;d2(g^^9rfr z-E$vk%4$dy$Mw=lFp$bXuvIuC;?qdUyZO_vOmtN|^0k<#%r`@^2F_$SM50jBu?y>S zKP!Z{hZwZ#s&bc_=2zo0!fCYkL4bm3-J^f+#`AZwt$O$ld}cb4$?Cvq=~bvf`Fu6zSy+byn!AwnG*+`^pLejPMqp_TN~|{l~?egKXS?Pu{QO(76Iv| zKZ+NHFrWSBNJ7r%1%drOC+a0W`y69LE-mf{_fJp7{owsmZ~$89Di4ZBB>RMb};aEA%e6Xk$03brL{hziR@uTt5D%0A>w3 z7@AAa?%-^W;mPU!J0H#^h=|(;#7l}GKkRc0h)DQ*xn&)zN}8ml7CtQh20OBv`JxRC zY`m^Pb&I;JpKV0Ke6|Uy%Is`W`b1lZXZ~IMmoA!i$tF#M#Hr}yQlM9fR7Veg5sJ{F z$*FzM$rOi_ePsfuZ2L{jf%y6rv_7@6mz>vFy}}WJAuahU_&d$JI$F7kb@h_w!CQ;r zSDvMoJRma(P2&LM72yFuG6ciEX_vx@6J~M!Y5UPS1AKTIbE;N`y~Pp5E6+JL-Zwk-vHrrRZv2{ZF#$5kwqy6 z2a+bK+0}z0Tfz+~gR{whryVGIo~-5iwwneVf0?>LlK(FxVevbYcoLdG#OuB)#)S`B z>nUj8ztCVDaHzD4%9WD zt@Xwcj}4d&V7ccegt5|^PuXkQVPi5tm1vi7p2Dn$O&+xO)skvbH6`7ZJUji-uC$PH zP7_xxO4wZp7q&Msje)u!u93K}nRMTW&Bz9i25}`^Weuo*Oj)%JE2xt(P~#}WsFK~* zk}o6y5Ok6>>W&^IQp2%Yw9^5s71eJ4k1vht!i5`cfeUW_L|8#Da%wCTXwgw$gK4l5 z#Qcp8`JW^|XMWkC&D2ybCGjc_U_LV!Dw&3FwX-dvy*_8(`gQE@u4zq`t}7A$w9x^n z-FjT~F-T*7$Tf;1t)L_zHR1gEEO@B#`HbtRz>g@-3f{hTBxPSGfjPEC)jdp=R}yh+ zR3?|-*J>JgMgTSyZbUgKXG?FleH)>?&EO`3fx6mM0ejXQ8=&xUA`4~###T8}yJ{jF z7J8jESg!5cS6qB$C;y&VB6d1O=%0J_{l? z{pGl@iH;rOixwN(*={gU{l*lLD}bg(1@D|}m@EClU3EXVbqXGV&?kE2A86HQKZhOEU3k{Vi0TAEX~e`I-U{bCFD4f_U%&`z@Y$F z-VM|r>B}Y~_$m2BtkC?LAI4z8yjqQYq5vWUb^lC3V9jJ+j}PJ(#Wr@3%rw{fFR6BJ zuYYEcB+G!?D#KtL{rT=F(3<;uQ`0#7JghT+qs;cpzpUAwTB1IPdNS{y{BMc3*by#F z1O&B9a;23aCtY z0x2B-)@-UrX~vFH9qMAS2%ca>qV1=uD*Q83rmNr*NAEM6NTx_t1k3~)f#OT?&_Yaq z3RAHzz3?vjD3lP)Z0DK)@-im+jh~EzMu=r)0%Masr4XDX4=gcn67k4br0S#oH#Kp| zzNmR_Lw9^6z=-`{U!ZWJzy^cVUL1;{on!9fpSB1^V)Jw`@b9(c% zFh|LKR`f1aH7RN}TF@0Is%L>HQ#;XrC*U|88%$w7*E?!3K#Yx+r)s0+PmAqv`8OS* zno&Zs5qX^v*#k~ju5lD*?g+t9fA82$QZp@#qpEJIZzByk5!y`g9fs%-H2}Z!mZsz| z1r_=lumnV}t-0_Y&TL94wing&WS_(VDqvX=lQ0=%u2x;!*gleOzMMX#3j-*Be~Ji% zzE9qqv$9_QaxzkslT14O`2Xei=Q4?W?88{mpW%w2Np~ND3U}^OR^jx-=5SbYDlWa- z(vsEYAI#RhvSgOy_wYVYX4MoG7C z$F%e=g_`v+Z3azRa+cX`M1$6UuO<4dQqjW)0Ezqn&MQ)zI-0n+Gp!J>O=`TyZfn?f zHfoE;Bvs%Hv=L#3GoS`B^0L@!T->=Z|8&y(`ix1r2N73t^p3?rC`TVW_qMevVQAKXz3KkpecC~ z+U7yik)b-0LtRwGlzT65TM|sG0J6ngMN|{6&&Fh~qb)c@Dz+C(jyzT7!QddUL*JJ$ z-%(?Wx#!$31_%AzUsO;FO!Tj6u}ucuwd81ZjRoF z^d(?bwP)T2j$@+B#`f5Xac)>{9sTaz`E$K58}N5*xJ&gDNo+p6ZHi#jsdXDM8qjIy|Iv2eFoU{2@krLr zq_RYWugz7Ge86?m9m^OsCPkp$039J@>TO8_)&zH+ja?-<=UKaH*C^_h48>wLHkB-N z%%g6!>fMP!Ojkr1sF)mFJ?ro<-PY}9q0cZCgY+p>bSWu+c2L?og+G!$aYH~lO5o7k z!ua>B?W#Yh$lcgn^K$ZcjTqmE5|ws(U1Ti~E4xhS31L>hvD{{2QHY%8yowzlDJU7= zHtmuFz-FvMX+9P@bvV9OMKM*_HCzAZ>89EDLFq_`xhzL`1hwpS6?9JeKq#qR3KTXrNz^>^iQH|mgPC&!yJIRFz->E3vpG&X5;qZ zWwp(Je*&OIEPw`nKWY6-(&q#+DSP}C#`&**_~|jwrQUuF;PC-6){l-e-s{I2dZkP2 zUVfDH5f-p>A)$sR`vABd2Yq%@?e40+!ap_!J`1m(VHIf^Xc(60C$T9=v6^;x{M%qS zAYy~ocTf7ceG-Uu_+vXF)R5c<;E2SF=;+rI+LqHDC3f2mOZQX17#L`(Nt8thWq zEc{-AyB&>S`ck&pXDZlaeNf_wC_f{Um9AR5S27uY{mmdtXVULPR&|~S_#ky1(0;zI zQ~wDq-yj&OxJRdrRW?*7WlaxtQ5!0zgt9uCNqp+lI~)7^T1iggdk-G4YkT|l$*tLc zmuyKbofL;u|J&9ghSY1Tn>VRo0*@QGAaa^J*(iA0ThDmwk^(T7q#0|>)BAVXyuN$y z#MHSqJ}~v+fIhoeR}vq_MJ=a8%{oxnG5u7ox;M?vGKwPy{*#P)gdc769wO^ z73t+(t5q+hUV8`{Z~Qis4kK{3>sFvreqNvo!0Qz=lCSHpCcp$3#fy_AhI3<dTPPkR>*qxA`Ae)RzR56-Uol1#6o9l$i6)A{H#E$PnMHL;Ag(Q0ea7jwe-ao%-I9 zhOSfVac{jIeIO9337&X*Cn78d>cr*wJnf|6d)rdDV}9+`PND-e@vA!xhg6}xS*nNS zTp@Tnf?SRSxejOT&<^I7{iaW^*N2M!q$~Rpl{9fQN1p2xds57PY|ne18_61kg=99}87QdKbV z^40ISCLSj`c`tWHQxWtymjSu{Ts3??s~a<;j)!zgfYXa>Du45INvrT3vy8Z|qQ{_4 z0wAOkDgVSVp&iu@b2VH*nHTWIJ4Hi6(}VFWq{Ai(Tf6>$;VCp{_ECUlc1{_*L(=H- z&$C^n&;r>47e;-bM^_fzKL;8s+9b^h?~xQxkhW45zf8sMor;q-?k)l~M@zA5Q|qW& zkh$&QjNN6|mQ_cVYo~zi5Ku4+*Z3S{ntVbDnI?bs^1X=DM+Nmp?`XQ5B079GFAkn8 z?&>-|V?`8yTsUlA!J16WLP~|ha*pZm&fk=5DfP=5>ZMNX4F=usIg3p}XiG@U($p(O zs- z;iC+H!peCJ%S;}LC%rYC6e1cQfEJ=mZ$ClmujNzFZB}C+0CB66p6&|8QWTzl1`Oy^9gbUA@a4K$)gE!dxb%!7dhhod)G@TpQWFhh}aDG6&Z^g)_h z%B)8|oPR@H>-fbI`e#Au=E;=qWI_ziYeX;31zFZXJyvSOm*@()s4>t5<@3WCvQ>gF_#PiYzouSUOier#6L5R>HH<<;T>L66gd z9_oZX*qP~^ScoZIN%8b0d3tj>;Lze*kBQu&bc~Hpt80Z~d2A1uh74K5)M!kCe6| zv&3DZSgc|U+Nt^#)S=ynTUcj`dU`&X<1B#22iyvRJ$s=&_Mjw`nd!7`2LS-sz_)RA zlG0~!LJNI2l|Z8OAeOV$g~@z>Y*zYXm$zQrqS#(y2yUpwe!cSaLn_1n2yUQT*IoW~ zG%|#a3DS0^Kb4*l7OZK*ixT9k?=D{~LYs)i#M4_=P>ZOM5dGH}tBMTqg{byc@9tSA9FKqn;-u}y-8;*S) zSvym-A`ebl3h#_x&>*FPv=E;0WR8>Pds{Qg#v>%nF?=X3Wn}Z<#xJpc#(K!QnVy7M z!aO1D&6EDeajy}NrF-{%GI;O7i9yM&E75U};M5U1I>T=`*eU&g?AX>5N;cA^rrijv z0tZ`!_#_N0aQetv3{Zub*HcJNv5V8%Q%u&{zOMv!*{I)=ps7ve3mF(WUqzLY!ImmH zP;G+fZGdB3pWN2xQ9llSqkdW8>%M9tg6NV8Ns%9^r?KW~i3QA0DV|=p>rgeT+CAUl zwZgD&gd#w-S_xQxo+Lw^F`1!BQYQO6YGG806sI(~?Rk0=DdJ3f1$hIm*g2$P5V`#a z6mrXs-^MiKD3tGR!lF1-ToOV;b6_WAq=6-h>BuYKV2!UTlw@3^t9pE{;5pJK)s2=XlG&#ROS6@K>R?1#iuBdZ0~9V80jsDa zA7~UwlgMW|l~rQbC-8m2V_~@bi%;t2LGm+lFc2ZSLNG=`yr$!3Cx}%&#Bk+PB;-=e z3wE_H`rrplECAj*_RV?@iTr;T)oSc0*zhSLq@pS5y0sPPN1wQ-OebJ{REL<|xO?mU zThLZ3CvT&Fl0Yt=X{kD9BHQ4GM5cf;qIknQhu&}>=3wb?tm{I5k~5Mp$qMLC{GNZ| z{gb)iAXji@nfxtw{}hngaf1qHdEAQFMLOulqrsOq+g6;4icC-%S<+8l!Mi6xSo&MR zn4s60HgqP#sW7=}2O)f>^Rnx+lkGf2r}5j-*X&b&E>)wQdjevaq-->@gUJXOOBa2_ zsxCI&tgkr_rpVb=lixZEUpgX6bIed+!aYW)_1i_iK*5GuQPz_d(YKfmXh!IN!bZdf z_YWXgwc9h1r1?VZ+@w1Uz@m@BosQ0tk763D>Xe(dqsZ%9aJN@FB$d1Z>^%+aR8F~Q z3eie`iLLpX6p#r27b9&SQ)_{aYd2X(t<gpbC!fBE7} zF2#&(6I=-lpSsG|>YW>L0tUGaAMv%`5^?KFjg5Q&^>2t1n1otYet1^U6A2?QBSe=M z3kR$A)Ez6mM?Ny%m6L_XcoW=I^(_$+bm8iM`l@9}242EXWNf`JSMMM%>rQy=CA=)` zIsZQXacD$-<&V9ezlZemJ^hV;n|mMP9}Bl?JEzR8V&%V?f495J-8w3}>%ot)yWamN z*j*3w&;D~;)|TMTqGNvJ&-p*iJ~6cLK0H?lT7nn~`9BnKcfdf2s#ZcrmU*u0Rdeot zO>e!UhOL({uiQUHwX$h+@JO6i_1VI&d)Wjf!zDA!mGPa%A&$(i5S`rf?@sY80hq5v zbE0}AM4V^s2%&IYdKpXl-C`ncn74cff|S~1*iZ2!QqDQ&3NG`7)~;ckU!03Bhme|* z>Zv!`Miz3HFP0Pl%RkpY$VY=%xIaICB~|eM@aZf1lRU!cO~!}b?wy&l{=1mewQ_lP zaafc`Uriz}#p8shHmV7qDDjGUAF*AelTplV>1sWyqsLgl)x{i%jXR1GEj(40)))lRLdhP4xOn zFmrQJxB)~+;vY=5-GRK-_3Fca-OJ3iR{;Ar5#$G~}Z`eOOb_DoDq`sr*U)GQn zlFSiR!e2sd#Le0vROsZ6lTn!nP<{$ur7A1fQQ^-Sg-pBQ{*X4#=K%}l}HYDf{ zyluus96s{p_t~Nulda`{=&WUzEP!1x&2%wP&O(+V-ep4EJy426;kH8?P5;c;q?&V$ z_5zc`$=|X*l~&D`MwRWl!H2qOGqOy%ftv_x8^V@5-k8al!U1K9^MC_7Or~TGuLuiF zJ~022ZGA?1LL2lY1;$C2&lLdcsLg-aj4STQ*R!_QY5B6PuMc4~; zz?x@Rznl4HT#-Uy%fuRaTuenfG$!(xOb$TVxxp|gXc^(GPR=}y3U48ulGKUfgUveI zS!DV=J3Su3aZ#p!PU?KM^oplZFHI6E*!r~(a*XRHMO08cA&7O?gs`ZfqZ6gp;G%L&*X^Sh`)tf~o#N#|1<{8KArbQHJKCF&%74U+t znGV>UGV94$B z+(=b@k5X#ZgrrQWRNC7t>?ZGU3l+!QF{k-xW^N11*aZM`pcW!#B=ttJ zVA;Wyd4beG?+>x991i0(b138xJQwTKpRWe0VuZFmah0Xy~GB)34pVmoM4a}v?x zCZ#6&S_=K}iS8`$txWOqw_OtAC$GV60IkWgU|`RFQe*;wJQ~hs%BP2ec}K5@7sFiWBGda#DDU0S1-oCJjUK|C(*j8N@WxoIp;mJ{Dn<^G&g15KZEwzym=A~%88k*V7iP7n;Z;3?QGlR1&{ z5K~N?-kMt^JnmCeY_b(^Tii`apnK|laz6q{r;jGn|AiNAo+&rZw+P!_rXy3 z^eHn~Dr_&35pTY!MCtzr00960?7d5m97nb$_*WcvF<=6oYEsmTB&Gls^(Zz-m4@Uk z)lTsAu*h_khkM8$Sxl|8opo)yfs4WbSDFF3H#LjFomD0JhfMvFvF|+0j(J3XQlbx#l#Gmwhr8La^Y|V&ogo>&DfyLPyjfA{@pZ*Oc-lRhlpTD&dgtCfBCjlZ#`OYL zgh7Y!o0!woo$5d9KIoV$cF(A~DSeBzxrbE`&x*waMHU+fkI2+TCt$onhXS={RU>5* z0XbWpVRj%&9xM+eE+Tfi%ZGG-#@pCXP8%eNGqwGp74GybLV8U=dQGfbP24MS=iB<| z3pGg2jd`A4aR@0vP$Thsm6OL$SuY?E5JN6eVoJ(3{gtDP%<|ihCsi@T0PG2s{!Yvj zv<)}1rzd6cl*|}!9B$f4gR`!%Tu=~=?#G&^5qcYOR)gdE>1Ut>e`!*Ggb+do6R5^8 zos7AW|0voR3v-HtM^!Tuj1wmC4vkOrqf|Q32T8wgaKMgDU`UP(aHOH8uPr+&O{0jQ zWIr}g3y4~TF}N{y|4pys19wbZH1FUefO-%3N}EILr2eK1w%?c_`pDUk$UFs0(K&6y zQ2G(b$(^RwPp`ixA?Q1QAAR`#3Ef@)_;0Dl>FZ+q_qa)4^v#OS&Zjg)8H)!;c2{kCiRfG=)+aJ%^3w@ZJQvUr~!_HW5%FegWM6RDR)$V6S7Zy=|CtV0*;_rr=Orq5@8 zPFqd2>wiPOav2$LJ6 zo4yqOc)NpB+wLb+0RJd`2|EVJG+K>d=)5p_b+d|2QEI_-_-!VTTK^_boBG1F#d9CQ z5EV0i-zPqnYjWm4$P?F`beDeBd|0#>rC!o|bN@K(nY)TnFY zFBkzgp-DUl48LzWLhRss#cN^9n+P{ftyl>bt(PfVeP~S9@&qTgXm(2sk&qPttv8QE zI-+?{iHKZ(qH7=)G%PRlY6a8VaT36CqZ=S^w-$r7ES(#bQ{qg+rth4PU|;GLsls** zdO@09B&#$kmdqrlP{AI46urC!M09~R$ZHm1T+lAjqRHh`6`Uiefnhx6E_-0?>f|vJ z_TGJPhCAi;4_n9quJ(v4nI~UVXU#!O>N7>ihiGDdm$6{o3-L$GS+u$I?K{EBi+>7o&5f@;#IN27feQ zr4{s()a%GKy(X4_nM+uXDB}tYTE#1tWE!EHmnqqNWg2Mw zuP`DZhK;`fei2f-nk2S5@MVA+*Q7mnQxitCQN-cScPaXp3I6rC(-#f8 zX2sLlM_dIs!E%mzNt^0i*buxe2~F|$f6LlpdqFY}$)Q7=YxN z-oAZTl}OaUo(`36bg$KO{l#jXst2BbT?czdEhaEdi0h~>O~h9bmHUXik#4w9qX7_L zbD|3ofisG5{$67Y6#~|;F*xkMLSOjrAA}ug8sq}#zrYYE9(%&}F^Bi-6g90?si*mnVr-51>X*>d?anWMe0k({ zC)LjzL}i+hKlE$L$2Ih_pZlZGH7gQ-Ej}gZJl1y(8ObPeMHa&6BfVU%6>1=eznEzq zRYW7%Ic!B+6nCAqJz1+uWX+L?qFX=A!+FDmFACl28M=m0=w+i$u3hD?E-^?(?TB19 zauE2nV3o`+f?UHp7>WtJa&b2(T zOjP>DKqT}Zg8AL1Qx&X!$%Y|;#lX4{L_M7OHIzk2mKHv|P%Ks=;Si_*P(ZK0f`EIo z?-f?b2!e}C*+ou7d&P!5`bWG|yr9tzFT+3z91vHk>wlGA`9(!+V9mPy=>UqDfBhZF z^sAv{ghW>(Ru8GHGyoGc}%C{RjROenEpW&u3w+f6Wuw>xn~NS5iUV*Q%Z zZ$Ib5{rP^w|J_lMwO9(v_&;zf<#>+DCzKc%I9ax^BjuyXIkE&CaWEj&7!iG8aUx06 z!P+IhpK5q;rP|ef;FwE?#}Jxhe@dq6Y)Ymh!L*>U#~SAd5~Sl$DN1}|$nsKFLOeiHR5Aq@Svqme;Bs_O*VZ$ z;j*(38%08>>op^LR#X3r2{VB*u5xDzerB7h*j6RArQ-=WJLDe)_tWjl7JaPWD!K%$ zR3Ld!QW4}y$PtIt?y-0t5NHoa5^!Qo`-jgTp0LFLKDJME@7%ldQ7H>)HB_`f9)AA( zaq$2v@nbi`q!jE}Hf$-@f7k!-P<+k`KgF$&AAf$5B<4KePhS2*PN2^#bb}i<&P;a< zd1LLCF~l(Tn~ARH`Aofz2iU2CO!kj{zEgK8jo1J9G<_*45-7LxYX$F%!4NLMZdXs8 zykbh9HmsizB-BV#Brs{W``KJpvNU>Pa*TUAk)ML^3 zdr=P$zRGxR;>g@@tE1{%{C+6a$!53TIj|yVHS%<=6DS$#+3f`-+KUq>=nS*$HWuvp z0POK)u*1pOGP^Y9fAFy+$kR9Un|3tEXE#x=!WhZzNcyw37*$;q$mAylYsb`}>!)fH zd@U=%{p38!cE(TifwQF3n${3kE=Kb8%tK7os3>kd@=KOX7pZbCzN|){J)Tb(Ti*HT zBbc>tC?H@O+w2G|yH(vU9Up4St_lIH2UgsAF2C0c5MQENn6z#MU zCz-Vx0jos6E-$EyzZvh;|FDJeV_zGpzCyd0oEjB?lsgw3QR_(2x}T_zg>p0F{S4aT zgeSV{>I=Wte>Gb0{12L0`4Zg}n_HbXs-q40Y*A^QIR%-iqpBA%<3)>DYxQy#@Jiyw zMj!9cdqfZw5dJPT1)f^Pc)HL?RfEmKmWn2Np2cp71r*-SPbP$6PC+F zPR+=E%C!GMC<0@(G)FqABmJpqds_1@9M?2(#(MOBjjoz69Dn=xi>Jk{pUiJP(fasp zh_t9vs!?ev7G1j&l5~u*9HJH^V4@CChZ#E!J?%69^t0AVJx3mWcq=wq5W%5P zSE|q6svDcTi|DV?Wf6_STsRFf2e5KZvN$1>5->aa3F9Bfz z6I24CvTfbkXUh%h9!@ccs2L172|OHA0wHlQ4X&d_vFA(4idVLltc9^EE-TQl!TF+2 zCY>i4mk8v9!e`5}An^S~)+D9$A#0ZQkxag&1POP#Gtq`Ze4HcuYcG9X>12RvOKeYQ ze-_T#uH!&R#6}vKxj~8=GeApMfb>3VQQCYtxh2usdUXnjQ$%(xur%%f$SWA2r#<4c zB~&ZITKT1ODmx-fpE8Q4`r2uHJ)yq?Sl0ZDh%1MP*!E4Hugq5RXs=PfACoiS!Kn{~ zvFIhub7scBk#-V<=p-7(I+K9&(Q$>ze~u930Zf#-Kcv*Ib2kR(h`SPNr6w(Gx6pV7 z(qAOpA<{U%JQevI6Ep2xQj?El&+?V!HB~PYkzh6v3k@BQ>QF);k}rKl#xDh`KqH!; ze|Be((}v#>+iz!FJ{*VW9BWTGf$1{M{$196vKZKBI~fcfC=RS+a2{j*%^7}@f5e(W z^NmcFAQ0?=?46Xf4_lu@s8Pm$Ja>%Z*1NawyniC6rFR=|#nn zF(Ef?s+SPxLT_dmjol{oxz1o&e~{Cbi4h^hF%Z@bvG=kS4~$zKTn&Icolb&W?Y^0> z|4&FB`CTs*8r8)i|49AkS<_-4U;og#;oP5CCKHPaNBDiM^OGbUqnD^gHwHPG)RiH4 z2vBDT)3clyw9opHX7po!*~oXxlgKd2LWWUyN?|dCwrc>ZtGj@p)$bcUe?{vPqev*S zLvxd<;_&rY^d7?C75^A-+_E447Myu^{3pQe}P0*YOZelj(?7hYW{ zA29OzqJ@V!uSBJZaJfsJrko>Nzb`{eOgJJGaV$e5_D^^WmurHvl=KZcvD`B%caA3R zmGdfYdlm+kf3DeT>2douj-H_Q=uBp%&YGd?2z@sAi9Uw>aO5EYTu>-XWhf|OLuGt1DQUZZcbG!=>9+Fnf@C*JoTq zO>SgCVTG5vbbR(WZ41@|NmoA*S29S4F1@ys=4g620Ga0Z1Xb?4&R^6Ge+^vpA^pAR z8zp`Cw@h01Hv|%Ie?o|myHr$X05|xx;TM7Q%lgwOajk_VMVjTsw``E0#G#Dly+m+5 zN478s#r;{)GvTkRLR@Yk>*}(ieT3p}{Is)`Q^%74i}&O_iJ~bFQ&_Lv+R_`#onR}` zRa~uDG^iCM``D}_)~iBElju^U>w`dnJK7iI$B5qAX!P2le?2^a!$|VB@JMiLmTm1Z z2pCT^?2;=X;k|UU=dh)3)fd-)o&4f12~>o!4>$64Dt$s{v3#P8tJe6UWn!NCt1>l; zHzTQ<;cB{w(5@(OOCq4Xma%E^^i_fRg$|g*Ls04aamu8ge$6b)-=d1-r}Q;%YTib1VNc z((u?NJy6Oo!>A&$CGMo|^n^|39#E9Z8d9hh=FzkKB-Yk7+hgUrt!M3(+3Y zsvD#Bf?Vg3v}yw{w`Glnkr}*EU2F^@qq5!wqmp-)Cd{8`~zre?A{tVV_`8V_Pz}z8Ge5fMu?2Sv>2n zs(Is}goHL1Ah|fAy@oCr4j0yL{U*h$6D)k~4ZoU;yn`L; zuCRO$m*cSW9{Or^Y<=3FCxIC55F~;Ue}yWMf%m!4(1=<{wkSsh`)TG051+5~pxO=W zd>-vJRFJe9z#KD%>Kq^NyY7GdWnPV@MMhx)Nn_L9+<*>T&%m&XGNySMed7MRBk5`q zi9C6t%l*w8Qgz^p+=YGugP*yhpXZ2`CfQlr1cmTV>AYVRza6T1GWv`VVHJ435BAM!`3}-0S(RHb%mtTPGu^#fB91i?;>G~^6VO3Lg&%;5s`ddRJf2j2)z{*ApGz4 z>T2G*ePVrgkbcFEH!?z*MvlbQ7z_VRNjxm+XBM{}wp$!wPXR4mb2?eIW$~YVLVB{~ zIYQ{e=aDrhm{G3wfpkD9s~ug^1;qxKMTU`ITu)5@Qse13X`xA~KUeMbf8RPfIwL4e zC#g$W=CN8#A`<=)ZDne@clF@Hq{XV+YoCBuQ4>MP#2%v}8(NN6=uf_AHvM#QRXlAb z61L4BXRG1Nf8>uHHErsvJW=%B+js7;j>g_5B#dr|CKc@Aj094O+ZpZBPl2Bzsm^Tp zPV0rLCdQ(OLaCMqzhli*e_x@N{%Uo`Z|samDf@^&R)gMgru=f3^ORzegAwB;C*e2dv_Lk#OsErR<}OwA&B~!^J~+Wf=_#YZu_WKbR!#1L`+Ryf zKE5`D*du}XCse3c*Z(b~8rv<-=8-m$oHuWarXFPhw5k8bG`~i4G)EP}B@D#^ICE=; zHEt=&)7O84n->Cm2@&PVoiO;8nBh1@a9ly(V&iWr^F4-nD+WSnKcNUjN=vK&eopLL z)0TbdQ{P#z(3&8af6d}|IGQMvNgs|-5&cm*J@SuMMFj!Tb%U$OCj-9W7om0f8H@Iz zRzYS`a%VZ5^m?#FI6s1*xo~u*v-cTE#JdZCs9P#f3dh`B6fd2&>!Esefu`I zJD4UgI)piAZwqE%jHC9qg=DV>AD_!`qh$U7yP>TM_A6_k`WoJVOmw7+(i>*kC*u_4 z7I=*{T{WN2!`m!PCb>jY|06KB10IF6p;Dw6HC_22;yp9%Kzk8k|#0I=CvfF55pJ0so`YksWbV5XUi(} zgB!}UAE#ZIxDXE^`u+MJ@Nh$|K>Jm{b}o#flxkB`D5q1=QtAh_U; z^KN21e@369P@q_<)yZ78~f(`hq_O0I`=h-bf{Necmcy>lt zKXXleQ7W#PN_1u|RNWr7&PVR7ae>nO-@B2-lP717OwZMKTGcTT|3~)ba zsTN(4wHVvfaW;%Hmuu2>PwF;4^QhGhH=+|w``d6al;W_12{@v9;i9TZ&;@j~aHx@1 z9v21qif1BDCDO2@jc8!>0bOV%P2NaputPZL)u8RNhs1@Le~LN+Qw>aynCX8QA)~_5 zf0IE7d4YyNT}U}T!mDF;hcRn}7Rxv}nGlu{{Z+MYfjdzdd0=O?uFF#|89H-a+a!MLviE##%1rcehgHomnMnijkIDpW1e7yOO;yjI>;v=0eQ$^P7 zR~WH=^SPm|uKKPZ)w_AaPiorBR-f{2fB4Wk6NgnYp^Wg{h$C>j*wg2aB{G(d?^x41Kd$(oz zb$AC5W&LZ(bNmJyCj9)WD09~Lf7(>TpPu8%{*RiKe^vVPuG;u_`|7J_ZY|&StFOL# z(bpf``RLvEzq)h#{rCJ&_wIctf0tKY=M(xM@+$x7HIg2^NsHU^-aB{SdDkEQe<>af zJkiBoGGc4@{pO~yZ3sf8X(x!}%X~Rd53&@4GwJ7Fk+Ny~rsMZvlRaTS84H#h19of$ z5~a5OAAiAsRxK08K5}4czP!``+7G$)FUNkTLFXZ9=Q0Gvyf~!R&LX~%f5o!gdJUj% z($d9zp+%!;#{hfff{-4hVTxw#TMQtmwx}BLR>#?gxu&Iu)A5Wy#Or2@J>*aC&L_pJ z2?RSoXiL!Qd7yw{lPL!XhQ1IjFaa80RscKe@)LScKlsl(0$bq!0kKnmcdX64^2dWf z5JMDF>yMJNie%lgLbFRRf8=(&sxOQWI2~fqeuq_DYG*bC4s8O{;dH*wj)ns~WrDFS z&jyJjg#}Sf#YMmAnHGjGspFmPEOtP0rxqii83RW*>2K9u(J#hdV~X^X$hSsA>JmA` zL}s=5S^x{36rqpBSePS+@Jr0!QEmD7a~^x5qcu-yRo9V)67YW{f0jZEi4sr607eku z$Vzv`d+)sa&fSuw9!PFM#yIAyg@(eV<7$nXO7oD!gj0@5C=bsDa`CHHqI2#mM;Tc5 zXIRE#a5n!bp)*Xu_YC+DEl^mh)^_empSeaWiBEaf!42}wQjEJHMjsO{U8e{mI)=eK zQ!QsRNa9&5-OW+ce|&$h2>}qs&Q|+5+aBb?B&r*+pzFa)SzFr3^^&N5F%ulbcG5?8 zuHh*hGs0@+*sf>PI?QX1DFi2SFk_&W(<0-7<;>re5LB#pY_?^gAV~F?PMn-_Y{xio zsU}Cqcu*JTqh3vtN0HejAOn;3WW>rT$)>Mbd8#cr2u|u#&i~)*7j`-R3BklXT=#BlkV-G*v9S ze0H?iT>r3Ys>vDL$d2>OqH+AxuH9gb-{C(${`p^DuNr}G&Xivnr_FxhH;C{rA5Ss*5?;zzutnaVuJ;9yJG z+@hgDFdxuoNf4f&Lug@~g7^KE_3KM?PfAOrD|h9SV|^C-GbkP}u(|~GFF52CgQ)-U z-Cqbpe~n?y4=vlaTDM1%YbO(>O3Vl{-dGdeG^}On>#Hu_)<<5~v}X6K<_BHN=ft>s zkCY~n69M_9|7Nz{?!K<*W&*k)-#J57--ypCHPzUWbqf)!kyCEj={0+74kETwy3H~KBFiZ_(r ze`bk3_ZMp-rsD_>z4nH9*vMRL5+bXs?G)EW#v(=9@=6KKbD8$QN&JPXu3G5dZ5*+6 zE_n_EI9$crOqhqPnpPU6_om5s_SF*De_-q?62qFP=1zW;J}C&g8y9fF;vCdyBJ(XI zcm}C@)NVV?^qDzJ&A6`6*B|#qH@Q-|qU;TkkM|j902ic*!Xo?%d<=G1s$(B1=m^d; zGgLku+{*c^|4+r2O*gjvpNki?D9Y^82rn*N@r7So$ixB7TNlsus@KKSN--gCfBBl< z@>wgi6wEL#bce&jMqi?Bn{$O}#ZmO0ktkQs`}=tF*F1F{)o7Q;4-{n=uByqHXyONa188o(Q#{8@&68^SpeSuXzMWj`{E3R{YB5$V9?%ETZ^yOMdZ?)XkA(RF zsd>z2U%U8Ok)G2>KR*5)`#A|de~gCxa&vNaoP(J`dk$K~1*sVpKKyVrYzgs}r~NG6 zWU-eyi}TgOb^Lf17{S_&~U0 zp7=#|lX2d#hXFdzXQp{$G)hzpes4i5B~5e{5LGloDYZVW*Daj z{?Mjht!E;j;74fLxQ$QN{9m0peqQnSe=EhE;MCueFsQ4-6chq)f0Y(DHJBhpS6%;i z#T$l<=@Q=BJI)BzIL;eJ0|a$$;7E{c)zwx^Y9$-fhG*#SNKEz#*qQ_91>>4*h8R2s zSga-{gC_DaeyKkPROne>tD`i?41o9OVdxHMbTYFC4>+p+FNRXO+*(Ulgp zQnI1n51Rzvk4U>he~TnS&tz-+SGoRI^p}G3vStotzVz^St{bijs9ph1%oBSHUos~1 zVX?yCrypcxv>?(^m%0I43A1wuIp@hJqq9-){nPJ2-OX+S`d)A%F1Rhw*VRrsHQ-+b z7EZXK3Q}Vhmtsn?rl5=s9(hoMq@o`pEYZo_Gt-pKRGu0Yf5Y?eTt?wsPYgA zJF{3<0!z%!Gebn*h=l!r*aYZFly9K@>Tl4;Zi1?3nW&*+4yf>32G#ORbpc8@L(K>q zX9F%Qu2{F|e|pvT@s@7gCz^XbDvGx&^GcRabTU*z0?FC7umjnhB z4;fzjW&q6vljaWb85{p;m{Tf%f8c)I601H7u)_9RXd*xK(9{Gx1&Vh}9_4!QflUS& z2=BLZU+eD!O0gn?p@sMxUM@(b5|Rs-uBvBNQF1g!e%Ej0LidX-(RatS9#_q*Z&vcI7jFUG?S8o7jcDj+xhDJL#jDpqKH zym!JQS^(k1@{4!!a_kV1>HzgrgsRVpm>L|pH*!m=n|zSj>I5sx#S+JmzHZn}&4T@p zC%%7ye{)$je`yot8+{VYtim|60JQTn`l<)8(k7JzA`KYz`#j+T&E-n~M|_B&STO|p zF&vPuwoah-l&1!K5*ln5SLY4R2THa!$m99?`d3*?+kbQ~X}qJ46X+h5?nG_b6rx9m z+PXR$5?N>nK)wca_mJ=r}5M?M5|{ ze{#=qzaV0$D&i?^b@pM#2eORjA$RXW=n*5bDw2+w5sdsq=Pj+7T1r~Lh94CfKs@JV zJvZf21wgA_19_A-#*aY-MObG+38D^B$ezHOgWh3SGM z9Zl*PNY9junMsB8jT!_az^S4#J(QBqe~D0#Ek^4uQdJ^PMovQ{GaztN9HR(po=aNd zM7afHkp4+vS06kYeSpA_xsfUK34rD1`i3(`R)J-e>LUQ-;!HBK))Mf8NSN zvUep_iHe4p3-1{)r(hr!w&vD`?URa%do@(6=3JWFOV*Bm&d3e7-L7pomyOn!m}h@7 zg(gHnnP0=h%S63E6F`(4V?jUA0Mof1o=lC?o&%6u#mfTHpC~J;5hB?_5<}4-&u7TxMh(kTUvdNj@!YmJqM6IF@4l0TsHXZ9Q z>lTp196&6=T5t-+^>1NvW2_$neJ9%?Lqs%&p{)yR%~p~>`t@HY?vB{he_T?{fibw1I=y0KQnv-`7 zZ0T@W>S0T86Z##X{=+B|Ub{TIz_K>>J{a8z4h^JUB8vD;qDlN>+RhX#S*g!ek;m6~ zoU!6_JZbx@Rq>hgIjbu(e|tyorT1mI8I*STtWqa!tn5koF;U*#mTmOfkw~p7V9fr- z`wYnp9kAGIPL{G?`3=?PY~8#xj}FbtRGbcvDnYS~`zHPgDqsKL$QrreZonRoE-p*m zg|Q-P#E+}XW>tK$I`=u3!savH^e+L?^2_(Rzgn3(QSaWq{lN*%f4HfT=x8bpFC8D& zso9@%{3TT!+sB7A83zSh$sD*e3A|0lNF}*~9z4*?Du}BY+Hr&bP2dk7qC@-opZ;KH z7O)U@&~680K3Z;rc==}}hU z7r!W@#0aG6M7EtkrB>8`3WELO0hn4-hY||0PEh7JrS@aaXG0#H?WKf({6WX}hgs`;rW?&A=Lf27j{BV?w2V5g3VM8Mh z=T>rp`DT`al$T+v>a8N~quTy5EHL_dmq-P9$`boxK{h+bJ&>+{V(O9%VaSbes8gk0 zBWdT1h%Ai?e~q^iH81rh;4~*-m(XMsx^@O#N@l?@8FrYPp(>5zJmS|WWX?}{!;P=W z-1z0wA7bcIR5mjpAi!bQe5rl2x<4hLUfpcvN{UW#p2Uey#Y9>?@+N<{(DZiAYu%(+ylf+voYBID+gvnnsLa8u|Hf1@vRTu(uIW##PEA{iaY&6T{> zjhmSm0l;CMihP4~5zx5rJD%KhsV{e7;G8geLX;&nr}cW!J~x-&I$ZPH1q#2r*3IwU zE;&u{xAs|dU%_Yp(lwiE;LJm>-dOZ!lQlqw{m*$+=A;~D^k1IyBDM#n_Q$P^0rIyF zIqlgve_a0`d5VgY;sLHdE+^gE%bqB>d3zYixAynMP2c7@Wr3eE#tqJtRtuSRzk1r{ zT%kp}Wa27ejU7Rd`)jF9v5{-o9gBCOVs9Zx9U=Q!I~LO!_UvXecjsfiOD^8zaQc-a z3;2rn@6aLdSK)^rsHJ977lSBm0bbiABiLyv0Br;E}m zd{hm1MvH>ZFZN2!nD#g(XswBQmNZZG4w9A~SBgApMhQu+O4hTd--OI{O4{nwh$K4L zfA>kx0&O&!PC0_Qi;a_1(-4vZA}y9qSwlmLm?Q`fo%{#y=a3#u4Qxv&FryQvpf}Up zp)$Efl4y${DBF8pH1(ix&&Z1cvXOK0l_45OVZz-cNLR-3Y^#S$|4M%e$tJjt_TT>7 zuYGYy%|nq{!qoa44^VoRajAVSeK~(;f6w}%cqWA4v3OV?c)8uwQT?(a(R=@Xr9XY{ zzJEfhu_U1{@L8%}WX;LZ$iBAdov^+%6?e^O}GNvRioe|N@+ z{fnsoatA^}LC%%${#<Ad+fSM=A{dXz$cr zqXnI7NEVy6MRFxT@s5i&ZYETwW-DrvL(MuVlyS>5*Hv?y=U~&u$m7S4|G)qHf4BV+ z%Q;-|XYYOxhHR>`9sLh=g0roz2rw#(%c+q^@!sv?!mm2VbXu0zM&do=f3E~Q&Elzk zLldn}#W7a>e3r0f@25LN9a9mv>~UMlz=nFr{M67PW--8ulqnYaw|4UMbq`O*x?#bL zzqOh~LSV|NygTKT6B^Q#MUr1uKr}460REEl(j@zrd03PKnsKe004FiW9{k5m2Lb_) zLI9MKxF!hAiqyjgyMKV`e-Mecx*=~DILW!OpsMr3GuFe>R3I>|KY?xvN7@(Kfx|pv zadEVykq>>o@u<|}WDu9q$d`dIVM*dUSDUlOZ@T|ZQwEfgppa1&JU6OzJs=6(_TbI( z1pU5$AJyv1x^@B#+8{yt`OxTr8?o|=i`>mAs2kjk?6LO^NIMi$e`|Us-HESfns;h= zD&ZjxM!syzpx$8R#3Nlr%h?;|B0P;`YM>tLZz1C-NO%W5D7YA)4?HFUo5CF_xsSxLge4}OXvU&Zz=@w0 zBV}kh;XrN11#Vx8f0_!V^wC5ahQ~Gyr>jnl|mhv*4T&J)JW*_AKnp#w~jpe|5)2CHc)0v|(ebY)o`! z{LjB-9F)(q0x1VBZ6q5K$mIr-#!HhA-p4poh?E^9t-DFR##s@2j6y_XgsY9Jsm2O< zIymLajc##W4ISl`^+i?B?1@HMr>;~sx@mmyaxdw%W3J{m`53TLYKgPyhpp_i(XHz%ne~D+?u;B(bS7KDO9j`}pnS10l)hIOeOFCy@=uVw}O4-_3!C%PmkRCK+ zPt`)R7Ebsa2!V-SJiofXR6=bl#w~KhwR~S^tD7B8S@>>_d7P17W`&kt&|ApoNH1t9 z?;n8ntW~Gu4v}MuzIz$ z?%XbUy6Q9h8Odbv45-B7SwElC^!3h%Cnb37K0RtNk_tmIU)-MwSbWuNbVl`R6Z?2R z-`^=!f1Lr9#1>?iV1A5>JmO zwWEkg#fZNtpdQiz1i+VUiYHDcJgVHVa_kW{8-bmZce=I^^v6Mc}eBG0iA#V(0q_L2uU?ta> z!wk&ZHnIl(9hlL|NBJ5Dl~u06U;E3rg+v+kmPsur_}1gsmsQK^31z}`b`w<;^MDpn zP-+aS4Y9AbPqsletmq>M$X`cr^rYk2nk1IAL5Yxaw|$B=__04;h(2?bWtRox18(4o zf5t4Kl3A6Cy1(3Pn03H{#w^K-xPhx}pWt@qu|H*GKcZ|o^-onY2tvn@xca{19l-0H zJ-2c*(`Gyi0ahk;chh3=Z5(F}mt0@~+<-Ncg zn%YTwFw0)UVh#sS_yhrl-UUSr`T=$f{PPjT&A3B@+F8I)5yQ+=&14dLa&DbV4*?Z* zSBZU$K4CK z{?2v{OWriAejDZ}Qmb0kMm?;E(&@9MEp`>`NO#=vtZ_s%f(}|!G#aOqr$D!%*19kD z^k~zmNrb%{RQ>QUysBA4BI#LUt6`$5mV50yvA!ikUc`xq%Wd|0Qb?BHe}Z#R=1kg% zhir4b)&9?`s9A=3s~ZBM-LCDoTVy#hz(h6CXxOHeCpbNAo|)*{VSb!R1b5_EQpIG807{e3csGk zp>S63T6X#NM_9!NT2xFK*|Cig;-W+mTG@tEMYn-9{PGr#xfdMVQD_^?(x$@A6Q zP|uOJyufDPfcXK-0*M`#^L&az9SZ_H_vqcyX{>u#Et*mel_Ya#Z$+R#G5buY1VDQN838Yd* zmFxY}gX0N1GPY}oCR10ye0OVPBEcUOWawJ^DU#8=Q#>T~0T+M(@Z}nP818(?dX?7b z=%}nAU&P@oaPSh1v6X0A23B)Ot?oy0J8Ki3SgwZNPayIuf6@fc$rwxx2PR9!DLiC? zR|?WH=xe+U51oOX(`G;|wz&+cjH*Ot_7=IoFfdS21ew0Fkx0&Kz#wvSG7rRr`RHU( ze->iJU+|1q`S)8lRK@4jx4fu|j{#h$F8iU+v%Xm6%n4cj{Zi2{dtlVo;z``aoMCb& zLTF<9RJ6?*e_;U)Gt?h9lrBXQNCL(3HIVpnQ=%8R8f1TjT7YsDR0iM7+IZv-gnBud zK$DTooLecCj)jb7C9#2L&j^?X!_}KhGj$YSN`vlE1ND{iW-Ei&V7k1J{Dgy&;@5%( znB>Llc{B=9lBS14zDz+o)(^txt{snEFGXmUmfFvvf9oC;dao(tfumo!;|M}Z31-7- zo`kUtY5=w-HFXhhig9cw?EY(vulrYVG%B)8Ev(#2wCyfuXqAwI89dbk zawHQxHn2TZ0(3J0*H@*!0ZHwnj41xqWd7G6penShM_+U zI-`!{uLJ2$`!hVC2{4ajj*Xh+3V?d-H)n$(f8FpvEoW8KbN2lwV(x{T4g_H*r@f%tKFrMm@BPNW)gd`kQqV)h=#mR#ccuHX-qZi#oU8VE4I$ z7K_?`o4%1@grKIG1t5rW89pWLOjQqDk!+=q23`@2?d?-ocAf~j@LA%tJt~*#Sj#A` zf4oMlJb?at()f+t+(mCFfLjlqvH3JZT~O%M7?H3xqamrpqei4YDSXn^Bvh7qU_Y6w$r`G*sXd5CK{$A<%A2fy|1v zTp*vz2)9gn;>`+&gEVpj1p0WgVQs&rR!t-8EBZ6|oR_%{xJ%nN6}C~|DR|q?+1Rww zC9W#W*a)`Yk^%IjNDOD(jef15U_ zXE80s-4awjkCe|7&vrFr!ob!CmFpjTTw~`gw!AK72T#4<98wF#hVOW_K_`TEa|}1M zsh>7JJhjEA{an-ZshWwv&RYVfqJjBjyjgpgz{rFuOx)f8-SrhXKBBuj)2r&J)j=&R zx`p^$i9|Q40HYN_Hxj?jc;S{pfB*gr@XIPsXDRbnT@s?V{YYxo2d{XZXt*@lAZ?)v zM``fNi--fX8ru2g@thzeae#AFNP4v-osyIw+(-gF`pBSsc~8IRpS0ye}>*d;|{Sd0myrm`X7)21(wrjG|?%B$P@*?fFYG zwgh|(CL*FgWIsiU_p^Qkv2`xdEwfdl=_M>+4H|o8g7`*+5MOZuEZeSpU5tp@Dv0R> zP+<^3STvaem`2;*O;@+ve*q^xV*j#=oe0xVkFtpS$#9X<%-SNr7}Mdzx!gqPuefe@ z>RhH!9}z@~B9;s=@XZF45o&)Ve#(nh3O0GyXn`b=a!5jl7We?=U_NXzPJDfF<~XN0dUU*S%)cxfB%WtDbz$G4Xv6F z8#eGN{77PGi`o^`9r3!n%nAyfACMKe{;6RhsE9Md}@jc z{YIltZL#It?CF3c;JikJY!V4nHSv8l<3fA*u-vVoXf6;|Sb2@2T zkEVTy-gROM!>L5hs+PXFWPL{eAzQjz`Pc{)XyD8yy(Dd|T3)+PcUf(NsKZ-QiHa~y z?nV>Co`h?0f58V#PrB;*zfB>Zp1UwEFj6seJno&x9M8#QjJ%dgPK?o31hwLEz}x`k z$jn*;o|>6zbV#g>WPPc%A$ikKFIOHrYu59?jczk+pcmlJIo9Av#y|$% zHT1@|*bR7t*P7xSdg7fYbUhNvO}t-as_mNs-Kg}Ue~hyVvRuM%WO2K|c3inAcgV3= z?sD>noTbFC&7w1(up*34iiJ)4Y6%$2=}u)OHPs<82u(#ohf{T&l0O+q+Tpd>@xS!W zn@GsqCCsmcFl&6xC;9o%?fl=A@vVa61ap^JuaJL98@8>w;u63E`8fWrQ_d$%0;GyZ z6RsHXe@EPC9NKl5MWV$})q?=X-dX@yXx6uHj-hm8pL^zD{q`;aNTvfJUoa8PmKx|d zaj4|%a4)xQA5@?_#?&#^cA?1`5AIT|LP&g08tA3P-EnvM3>Y5BH*%=rDezK8J;AKe zoAUE$Q!+heN!7tT8{&!F+!#oVuhr2Y&DzWvf4y=$8d-vwOm4@DJ2*dt&qZD{KS+)E z$Pu006yhtQ7Y`)YR}Gv7u{ugnOlQ4M)0W{r2p~=vqSKS)@b3V-g50pbrBrzOBfnwK z$$$V2C&c~T4uEvR60`cO3GeA;z;I_-%KiMhz3l_kVaS(NJC)!^{^ac@^+-B&_vbZF zf1BSqzgN2RyZq|iyx}J`?PaS^c{lv-@k$@NBkvpj0N2{Tj{iNxOrQA;_P_oUaFzcg zkNB7Q@B{qg%=r`B|MNEfQLTM6^RM>aZGI1*#rQ{oBk`{#&++?ynDFzf&cn05|I?-# z{`4GA_J7o@{Hxx?|%5zo!jrf=YP6)??bt~ z@;aZ;2a#9#Pp=W<^(HND%X{zKedn%^q<<+M{=@@KSrS!{5r`-bpOefoy*Zl)SIzW# zE{4c%dgI)~gPwD*1n-f^ps1z*Q#Up2IP%9onvNf7@2@yR$AQ&R+uMiu^$?1pe^@eE zEo(dJVKJsTk*UtBPs4LYo+IpJ`PtGAHbN1-e|sz@Wd=j;b^gTT1WC<1Nt`!5FUT{3 zrs!+(ITT)UJyZ!dnqN1_mW8oMV`o@`6Vc-X7%?hT#K{=BMO#{Cb^^nTMHr2Ktv{5V z@$P3{u-Vx@L75bRv1?AeuQ$Kif8Q*Ab>e$J^*7|2)z=&=`4WuD4iXX0PNN9`M`f)b zj1vP7MQJY#JSYYo6R_d>J4Ot+q2`vFCHog*k8(D%HwmSU2rtR{9_QLGk(Cpv$si$_ zwGuu}+Jbw9lJnF)ekIITgz%eHlmtxgRTUbR)aKA-M!kxG`C2?ethT6=e@koCC?sVK z^e+6F>$ItBgiCtrN^Le260(wXfTsxOZ?>X~$F(X=PNV$Je}>Zt^?<^PUjUeE!W0Y| zy>;aSWmjFw!FIEDs)4WnRE+ul&l-T|uev1%yE4J)`f;l;X9f_7!n)4lTsXcJn-ve$ zMID3%2xMp-wGFdvaE;lce*u$qZ=|Iqk|NT?p{6lTtFicc9-5VirLTHXA8V{}=Tf{1uL|z5g+{(xW|4nbrK5M=x*6dhe!V zfIP_@VZ&c;D^|8)bNCxXx5(iuare3z?khYVhhV@@c<*Ge-IfMsx_siB@vMr zXY5ISR;D5~gs~J#9jf z&SK3TY?$gahJ^35CJ85m5jRaszT!ck1yNTlf?ETvVN8VSbT@$=Map-4 zh(;sOlf~r74Nzcn-HKZE zRw^k)Bh?r9NpZz2FbO1KDEE~|#LKCb5{vNRV{mQ@6tV$het&n5YCLA9`ANe-Q*4># zlaPsZWXjn-l0B7aAf`Hg^Ohn*z&ayMtcVIur&Kb{W{genev4=uqj8t*0Adf)NLR=+ zhA3?(3i(thfA4+%QVmrgrfMx6Y*WUdDm%ZlE~%$G@-rR&9_*zrJSE0WvNNEUa2? zi)0Ilf90~+@#jv)+L3N(zBeW&1TL^jy(TsK^?vkU0|mz9_kA*=Ky zb8TIV{q9RhXnwIL)S|?;;k@n7)SYNsjbnAri!bucE8`<)n~ervZ#s?9u<3p>bEA(N z25$=)0zmR8S8vjJ4xu;7rHT5TyOGYIdj6?He_L@&T;fj3jf6sK@xoNIMLW4{5l3O3m3+>6hje$CF8a(ow&I zJ1Kh%hy3?^zgUq=5_hpjB5@GXdser4bZ7-VWQ6#_VszGU&#>X*?Bjq5kf3i%=cE&*7 zfk72U#WM|M)NX)`3P!$qs7?7;@t-gy=zqL@d6zIHIe0fY>wNm z{UOokm1NL*%NyY(s<&Z%^yYgB2Z#KbAj#?lrd60VE8`Pzldwfw)hsrdND_41lz$x4 z84U%|Q@0*}(vLeQxZwgasE1=_1vs^-LxK~hC4I6;>AE^2 zKoEljf~_4*di8g_?fO;Np3G&t@Ok4jubfcZ&=2bLo2Z1sTQCzmn}@T?C%DZzleYs1 zg5&87dkq-vQRa^*-}V7ej&Tdve}7d65;tqGj;!j1SR%icW0T693FiaCn;4V%=gG6i z854Nqq~!91hXVFk{yiXbXCTrT30a}#<^!I)l!K0ECrPJI(1~&cOve+b%rGb|YC=vY znp70e5Qv@OSW>ya-OkbYDD%jp?oTCp2?~R|P?{m-j#!_&KNlanswD$q`hSGu=|B63 zRNT6A@9y1yeD@dszk4S<+-=DWTfOdf&CH^<5&iWCY$pC&UrG(l%9mKr91yMOTRrQq zs(It^PI&5j@18915gDNn3Pm2=wYJegH5dNn;}#!XKNp|72E7y!;tDfWJ6rX}C$N*(zm_GT?$5 z&*7DB@%6Zej=Olqv2fz0YSV3groB0G(^cOLLbuVZ_NbE9X;N0eqJKm4Ry-;AlNbPY zBC9Zq^ynU^(o6+C8a#f}UAgX*BN(c7Y1Q>{+)X~j6fC5wr-3c^0C-^H=7C9;^o3Z; zkGlZG{}Bih_BhF}22c`e`|7+Rci*r@6?j`buzyU_fo^2KJNw*4IY?>mWi!P}+_-Mp z0zU!_cj{A_ZGeekt*PKJ$06@$u0V8mr)4d9 z+|t9Ql{X$MwlNKQg%P;*SpzJD_!}wMhL91$3BruZ#C)Vp!fIp1@Gw$gn z&@Y!wE5RCqS3=Mar#0MfCo}rS5Loq0#$f4g4bzF)7KyC1X;jy@_?XB!n1a(F;*XCb zZN7|1nSX~QJbg|xtPvf*KS_&`T2&j?Z{-;9MT3O8cm{-=|JL{lVyQEzoNP6$qPSb) z==+cF{tFi#$uJSo$sQ3vX57lS2%doD-i$7}ga{><4KaUmtO!8lKDu*a8ziRBb?eSY zAKg7E_qIgnm+zg#&ImvK-bv`i6S_!rP;qR+-hYD?tUGWX+0MLn$q6lXHTg1R@?%08 z@Py!9ylh?-C! zrEr^31n`qi2d$)`epCeM8(OJ8!LC$01B2>Y8=sx6Fkkck!d4ieqpls<6I%qZ@|%(A zq<@>T!c2&!)jlJDiX>q=FRB{Y#r&GuuwGC`DRnvn!8nt))IMWPC!JBWvVE#HaMt}K z>DvU+WyyyvLIRc%n>c*+n`H+NLT{V#I)7fJ3fUG=lI1$zx^wSCngyi<3~6tt67hN-7mQE*Io|q zu_~ujvMp2>G0#773%$&8$rxTv;RmyC|qvhOr)#7jv8k?!$X%kdszmw$-w2 zE5POR4X@!B%nP#Ei%>7i2B@a?msBo

7IRvS5`<8 z#rQ4=os<^P1cHue#Pb01);~Xc{`@3-e(0;*;)rpAAOLykUUb%OMfgupwmK=Tx|3Sh zUjMLdh-1)e!z`yBy(`x9#Iy`Xzr;Skp_>#(lLHtWT+`twY8&vLB>M}M=(+$gtb zeo|}@ZCn=!QvsqR<33PVve;zq15jl=0!3*I1xTEW6PVVDp~~PW&-IY*&I`yHXjo(8uSJJ5B)}PEd z2cbtaT>Y!cIV!mdp5fg z8Ptl~bVQPrDbPp7g#&>4WC4GmQLMG6XP&Q7Bxzj$CgsjP5o8pg(}yvOK#>NM^)Oc-i4PAo5>nN!xQx?l1;n;%5UUgS@!m&KP3 zf_yCLK&}mBG?^kx?(et(i^AP$)F@_rVmgVQuKx-_mNLNJn7P;c)EKNOXcAaKCi5hP zcKJKX{;D~1#41%}7k`^G3MFp6cA_DY!2Aqt_VDQ37}gZ5D7q$u)oIQFo(}z6Go{Bd zvgrq6m4KidedLcO?x{Q{wWVH)wW$Hmv#P!&&gDx_O#+s*VzcI5VJa-1d~7!YFrUtT zfhI@)?hAPavL3)@!&9_#X`du++xB%(NuB~KFyo0qiBMIymw)coi8v-X8dt;QD2*}D zCgDO5Slnm%{tnBtB^4V0Zyasboy-PCy6iB+u27D4f&xq-qB-+(i0VbRZxWPpJbDBr zFBbEeij}BgRSHmLf#h5fYy=nZ`MhoVsmwf1;d@HZg|)Ou@-?%@0FZ)ELr_2LL;-QR zPjV(*Jh&FT-N`Dm*SRdqYX|sUwn50KIKwIO*%6wxq_!FKDn+mnuE}jDfz|RLsTuZF zV9uzeD1>|==SON#GUugQUZnlflPBok8Ud@wiOHKYZhx!hr2)aH`CvjSSLT0~qUk{@ zrDL4i@aHZ zm(f1ABKO=CgFs9l>a6W+#;Bn%B4A+jH@6+xv{1aU@mCfsgeI`>Zf=cb1a<24^fw-~ zp|{kj;D3Ni;2Esyt_*bQ#>Fkm#Sz!rJT<0Jplgfpz~ekcu7AwoG#9xb+-(9tpa(!<6jg1ajWJGE zsLl=h;Ocsh+t_&Xe~WESa63gM)9{Fqm;6rwVt- z_nU@*B1hD|dm_52{Yyu>krhLBiiyfrl~yGKG;vE4k8RBdOfs{3oSIUL?rSQby9?3$ zF((5cuuT7(N;hWm@atzgRW&8=6jhqKP6RTg@N{!R*rK}{LH}o(toq~#w~!~fm$>fw z!GHY$F%N^Q;|bwczi>B1U|R$EWauAbI!ZnbET&Fyiakg2zwFI2WLWLlT&1 zY&sLUSJw7@>|0h~l!JQZ7e;?RE6H%{hKVY1YZ!xr$wkWvLboTSxdvSx15p8d+!6n+7BaR@mu1m`h1Ov z&9M$4$2XLD)L}!fAzZ04eWu9ofY`AH56f~SC%@XF`#kC+N{{%Un4?R*4>aehBY&h^ zn5IJ(h5PuRfOK6mD*akNn9dZ9W}qdU!g;ZRyGt2xhcL7nWbXBR!PO;|8%6T#%p+B^uvd6WNn+Q@H_4>*D|+@JFt_hPCCwX?Y7-U8nzaw7)`{%Z3I=3)PKt>&+?!8 z!T)@};s5R!Ys2ID6z5EqyItH0r?04yz1c4}58Vt%B-KxOzTl(EC!Ot&f4f5;8a^L6 zC9zGkjHBUArh05Y>{vq4r3;Ec#!nb|N!5G8{(1#KqqWe^6!{u|pw45# zQ?N_-t;A;ZS#Td!7C=+IQh$WZE20|CB!xW9JU2ACVEbR)t3y)Z@buy`27%=i5=h=@0R}$XO!i{k-t+M}U~>z&X~g+V2P>Ra-HE`GK?uUEAG&d1v9s9xc=85&_wFKjjC)% z9lEi&<%>VG`CC@qE@S>(yJ3Q%wV2G}czkx;cAXIe!8ZjK;#*kP2%OO#qi-Tu!Trjaa)&?syk3&}o;98r}BqFSS+= z{VA2Gk4K3Ox4}W%9+p(T50WQpTQU*kgyf(I{FW+T6UNnL>@)0hTqC;5I4J_#hkt}h zYKwp>!u>K@aWHpDd)r|)F#hAa|9VVu&=~l#D8-D6#oJt*^nZ5bxbD3xa$L7d0Ge1& zmMYmDJ=4Vv1e9g=Sq(y;gqS$ksr&Bh`FswVu2F>u1rAY%tAQtoZVES-q*Uf;L4&?0 zyZN>hoZe{GtZbqzF+4JsMBntKgFsRlP^j2d&59;no2tI>A&&SlE|40?Qp;+0QSX~I z7hbJr{>v}bbAJZ3Ja;tZxhfvkd0I9QW`3VJ{BQL8eF=chkojw|)yAu*WN-FsKY}J= zQ+36o9zIu6%|C)+a+d252gq7C-9H3EBTy|tY-Je=3 zK9y&Q&@G+1QqYW}Y&m6%TZypSlJQew(&Dd1e`=q`Qh#|fA1*K=sYZA5dRW(AtaV-u z=Z%Q1mB<}w%uHAh>dhJ&7Ey!c-UVIs!&kURR3$yBlp4m15huk47E;ehe;pO8x+$=RPkc!kSE z#w}@Y>V7IdN-!yOsnS&5mr<0nGXToJ%jtPFP_`i%yRXTTw1r$^hJN0X`^P{=-oO=% z(hMH45}?n@FpAGyKll(<{I;4%PmO>%G2F?Y@_%K1^x2Eke?CFFiG?#sA6dNZ{>Jfo zj=mZ9cZOUt$f1==@`=^F)_R5@qrgA3G9!z{O8PR#v(poJauA4&FsS{V3r40hKI3)W zihuF8OUy}Ew1i}!KrD?+&0GPF!Kcuu`vqq2od3ni4M)tl6Hb946#=4PJuh$M1V+nQ}{d(mo*)Xxd)I8&JBWWsZ<$wctp6F-FxnNd=HtAb_PR|#!Q}6WRj8PHh@3J z5hQ6WBqr#Y)`)oy0gGrB101w|962cwp??d8pY}t%YhhiLP7@eeSG|Hw@nkm|p7|w8 zxrHuj{&GRUHCUQP9nUYtQAw1{&cV=gO~L&3s3(UPzf@ zldn%|d&`aRz55G$?Ydq-_yK%)`aSf0B>&%!HC+kL+W)4n(69OYGyG#-(dVXrUc*1! za;Q4`Z8xv!jc@Q5z>uKdrSG9!p&Rh^>rSzG+diY*{Mlo?nSRJG=(pa$k2h{Zf9;1K zzOR;gtv~$m!;`lB?D`isZvAlm+JC1v>8o3}KG)}@zvmu*5dAH`d5b7xPkU$O+`Rh9 z)thwk|GBu60_a)bZ$kxzAlq-JeHLp`aXDln_q$f6^yE!c{+*J8!#uuUkYZ#&eBXy9 zA7*pRZ)0A!O1&db#NkD$+L|)vc60V(;^M$r3dclenYV(z2U?SEh;ost+J8>9OvjtD zt2jAj$KR!kg46$Wx}t)0pd=Hr#f4+#d9D^SLj@nQrnZ?&f7{k=>44G9b(X%m?evAX zqeY}RlQYM@T>s>UpPAzjzNG{YMhl}nn71Aom zx&QUgY9dEJac}I}ZDsP~v40ixqnHT9--Zg+38Lqva{GD4C3*@Ngtbku@sjMpgajB= zDt{muzvIAlTX5oJbJG$T*6l)8TEfcbf2T?Uvj}cZxzScW+Xq7#tvXb~C81-K8*Lg) z@JUS>VLv$Q^Oa`fzQkr+8b_eQ^r5cW&NUw;Uza95^=J3Cvn zzY|9u3K?`*AJ=}vG$*ZK!gMg2Z0(3jSO$qBKy`HhI!;XUnv>S|GbOI619Lq2e*%D> z-7x3q$k~)s%$myhzQ6tPpGC3_67>sF2BM@-+9aJMw3<>G{fU00-41j?fQ8AA^_m%C zcbs_C<&c0ISql%iaDTi$$h1yGYs#}1iwh{|^dz0!U0f#ugo3%lNHR|m1H2a&kQj3D zzt+4mf<(K%gSLKRaFXqg@e#S8Y=jZ-+PB=WeC}z*2?w5Vo+3xj%Z)HLl^lfnrPuN+ zOlax#wa0eEDW2?#pk*r<8Qne%?A}vqDXz#KqiEXE|5eYqseda3I$A%HWgis^7r=lz z>qDW~=ar;y-cNh1G?6$CMc(`9Gqd&>tDOO*O{dDTb1Up5t~$GRXv6x&ce!RdN>Sbcx77=)1St9}a@;8Cxz<&Uv)5Mjw@{-PbfqRIMT#|hX z=(P!XYo&i>RmaqzjaOH*2NwC;GkM-(Alj{#@KpP|0S)HDB+wt ztCJA%T+N0`_k6jgYiy9^{ym-cV-HFme1|^!3) zdSOeR1%C=&IyfVvm0-hoMlDy2{0gO8^}J-LBHwmylwPt~&F?!5YIt1zqMpXg)O^>) zmUrWR_FQdJR^m`8kFmT7`Z9GOcR+xe5J}o+gGI!rX_kHO;Cu1kALKpcVolZOtTPXq3*eL=GR_FXC*N# zW^FvFq4TVn+HM4#>HTuqiQ-8Osvv_cUDxuAJiZU#q?o=Db>N!ie3Lggg)>uHcj8KY zg?#`Rp7VArg9GGAh|p@I45+Nos2Rz9})l167naBP}9hU zgn!GiD@`nCU{}LSb1*zme~`2td;FE}o>h$-8MGm=|E6rg?lo%+4*u2is<{76@jJ@6 ztL8Vck9Pn5{o=~QwrTONqgf)?v!l>QtC(d)<%AeJB{c(2unQ9je`m&Ssf?8gzR*JJ z(|`8i*McWgD>i*roC-#}^>UPzYj^gS#(xMsHuLRI8^}6YUylA3ogn499n0d%S7YOj z*zuh;{$slfn4@F-{u`faA>;B;VdQqDW>6NF!}DlO{4{ zXPduPu@54mK=uyPB&w#e(KC^|YQ4R0aN~391yl>zyt7yZ$jrmu$$2)jMh)C3wU(Vkc)Vm<-J$>n7OGw(t7PuoCWeTR^mc?r60Ko%_F<6-F8#Fk@XyetRY!J>9)== zMv7AqrKe<=8shV`7+XhoJ`G0^dKLr&ER84Xy?LVU@)%Ha*vO$UYlDEFN;<{(+ zvlm99prCVfAvS1{aUHG03^2?xOW87|?DlU7Q-U4oAR#_st&M|8#|Wr$^GX2Vd(CLD z-gMQV{y|*#V(ZBNgiFqe#~Ie55jl1~l|yz@e;qnqLF=MZ%1+B^Yb3Del7DhzG9qoa zPG+63Ie1EcOlP6|Z|QZvTX_AL01tQd5k(muS3F*~ZXMO=n91n7sG#ea_7nm;vJ7qm zoS)!wqejsajo0N#5m)u!9ZYV;qq2-E0&+egi-f@mpUlgVq1l*8n?xAJ*6i^|n&&Vc)C1C%9{!xBEX+)eb#m8gU5J=h zY$1Rm^+g`6(cW4ibFW8#EIAK$Rani8ZxE7G#>jQAS=49$*^kXCOMt@8p!*Y+$`bTP z#)9EHjS^NkZGUl^Vp#&FkV8#k^3I#f4Ne|`fhOtW9{TRr+w)mF#6EjE@aKFI6k z${Ik`a$TLEB}oY~{b4+(jS9?CQts=THh(8a4jfL|xj>7|Rl(MOI?j(di{R5PV#$s;pYfo zd}d)O;8s25j40M=QLiQ3F?#SDZ&E;=(mv@aEScFS3nNrygT-^cu*cutnH6^yZM`gP zygw5!c7G-#;X}m2$0V^CyhDdrNhiefUF3nP_MM>9zaE+I%iK|~@FaRihlw!ErV)vAu#`GENeCqIzvOW7h10Ri>LyLf1qR{l9I=AbKgjgF#Qk=7~l=ODR3)KXK zl^lSIHi0EX@K-?g^ILLuLFMBZ3^}^M$YplZ-hbBw=g-(+c!TEgJr^$O1bMnkiB;>4 z7pAV$!AUW3w-yC3ZrDg02sjyhD{CeYXpgB|o*D0k3?UopF5HBk+Z5x3 z1b=SF$~M4*Bhe?F(k3kwO-4#DW*@F;n^WN~{Ca15Ni%cOVNV;azUD;!v~bDTsi8E= z7YXCdycQ)0;kcqF@V~nF4F>OZ^gk{SU|>weCjI43xk>sbjGdKjJ;fF&cco}qZ3U>D zc1-hZ|Gaual#kQXW&@?c7)6|Abe*UC_J1S1WGN`5=gqLCT%`QBs1x431@KR2|8rf_ zK6_UAJnCRbm;{~6h6+Ziu`Ylets%jYlpxrYR%~h|gU^#H;Dfnq*aU_2IEz;td~qcd zA!=0rvtPN!%zCIUZ2RgtBq#L+$C%`;uzh6E1walsYDY4`6tpj!fq8TYvMtOeo`0{b zn94!WEm)xR;4bp7mC?v~jK@o*R7DZlV#=Y01X`89H_YCpIi??2D`ryRV7Ryy?Y)R! z$(lY()k-Tzy0VEgWs+J>$8~ukE+rI7;AAvwXJkO8D=?vas5aYvmKbcz4CE79{F>nM zZ_7>m5lA`xeF~-*hK9*^!Ih*Pi+{GWYo*{k!H$1ySL_NVJr&EU!`#kkfx@RAwC+R? zH{Zks2vdWUrGrMC;E!n)&RZV2RP@oBXKq$R)Gl}WE7i+((mAcU0arbT8KPjXMgCRA zo3pmov@xs~rF}s*s7sji=GXR-EwcspI_CxkHgY?UX+FYBZT|Y_anY*)SASnorZ}bU zL?YL(HkHt`j7_2k!N7~OdIeFE&>lL+JA4OrlP@{8KH;|QrFW|?JyEn~BIBUF#X2FI zi2!IvF)2?#O^}ZQbqSgYV-4N*yp2vFvrQ;afut>x=S9po=xxiodY%n^u`omMiC{s} zSW;lD+Sl=SMOh>#C2&G5ihoKrCVR2V^^CysL&uq4NL<%yZV!3Op76=A>^wvB6W`Wm zAm6w3!dZ(~sM-qMT2WmY$67MF+~6-g5iqAm?8D_F`z@qzme8hgzHnoB&{w3q{|DStD@ElOmVWd4#y z=Na8%iF@f|pp}}~s~bSwrbZ<@TaevYyf%dUh{>jp<9`+qBZOI5fWoar@H*Kf zIWuWBpw<4gPAyWvq-ttq>xL;MrnvVUdjF~Y~3B2soa_M??wokL|0elXRbT8urz zQFbgyrs?Nx<_vXhghDFh+y+|4dG~e8d^}c(SJj*dO@b#H>#X797!gol7rlVM1>Vrl zVrNEF&QCY?r10!kD+3GUAi*A{E z1PkU^N6?q&;D0^)qqNG@-@S~a7TuFQ_tDs!K`>PRc>f;}Le5^4BJ*zas(#{~+Xr>M zUa~02>}{lL_{vCy2S2nm1038~3S!O_dsz(S9+NBr&pF$vnTT>!JEIs5XR369g{p)> zaj5`L9a&qd0I6@lp;v9T6ZRVC0=b%4G8Ur!2BaLkwtsjlXAE*%C|}go@XTe)G#Wlo zLS>A{3ItxGHtBiYDd-r+2T{zD#xFoTOTWz~q-ehLEX|`f4^=1NIVrs5ONpPBA)w>Y z(`T2^8B+_$dA8~eB5#NOG{=dl0Kis^BXTFdTu8h;``4k{!;6`&gk~0r>^gs)Rt5um zqp>moOMhl?h?6RtQLm$BL%-Ut+1>qiSPc5yb?Pc!`w*ocVOHX|!zmWqL`2|i*zxZk zj;7~3o$PC2V`gGzFMAm6Bp z04T%v7-PlwQxJ>!C+U{YDQi~QH`PF@q_>p_GYS2<=-r&IcU1*}*g*>(s>76 z+0b(rOIT+97w~bzdZhn;A^d7|Nt;1@zeG;Fo=PGKz)Q6)M@{I)-ZyFlW?3IhyyTU5 zn)CZJs@OnKU3mX-DW_<3{bng**ZS!l#DCP&IFhZ#%6Qa0YiTPz%X5O)3{d8v!+3fL zg|q4LHtjR=K+;|0$)?G^pcu=E3g<${2|kFWa%c}+)l75Hg!3;}>cvA}uIcpoT|1U; ztcUE>{_mWgk=g{C`{>(}<@~>L{nqEV#3FbCxz}bOcaeFLqI07z^rbW2rS&O2u76`| zVImnpOF9#~NKb)j`w7ZJ@L+T*W`7|&W07*UtLwh<Nv27L0(nEp0evNTD}Ogi@zmQowZ zDH*)_Ok~sEz*?cE)8=VfS~xcDfA|eM3?8lQkuIUaGnFv#f@!~ z)x`bl80vCdqlMV8g=l_8UDOoYku7+iLcgyJ>PXvtkNH9$)rpbL@J?gRSb;00HW7+1 z6?vaIpu>#Dp@O|MZGU{ZtHI@o-%*dlpanE{K>N49`v(viO|Z?AdgZ-Lzh8%A(GWYq zJUR^FDZCER>tIK%EMv?OK$}?LaF<3RKlYbzI4Uwh5nYiBx+&GGWY^9QOZ z)G**e-4Q9N;ao^A$*EB>nub)qt zMt39x@rAtD&iSn}!3tfCRGmVYAF+I~JvPTkV8WG{Sj18es_~XP`|R+|4ZE&=e#-0+ zp4;rZ34c&-vo#gk3#oM{I*&0aaY@eVSJKzY<*Ji7=NK@5j4yArxkb+sj(B!uu1yGW(95|r=_wB`RkySZQ`s?opeai zAM6r>K>(l5c96@nNs@Ur3a-c{{2t1$Qy>5bNq>clE$JG#ixs#H^UWq@Stnu+x6%cp()=YA6^=80?SjIAd^7>{s(7Sa&a)Buyx ziWOt1Q*TtJFP$dCgE6%*ow%D`$+!#gG;`#cM^}scrO&H)W(XS8lHmCc=h^(Ex>~{` zI(wO=1j*eM3MMlu137f!`EuYb9HB=+2Y;nfHa)V7RwU<^yS$7A>&e$)aHb@}V=Ai~ zDvo7?3(5v#(UR3+FjiWzv5|s?|LJtK8R@@YIZFJRtQ+ZJ6icFo_H7F@8;m#dET!wW zz5wJ^dwW#FJZ(j6cpA5N1LT6~mcg}84VNfgzYx{uREtsm2b<<{w}d$HNnW3xB9p%l@&$iq44y{M4dt79GL(ou{%+BCbtqV#On_ zgXF}n0*mmvXmM$$T2I8QQ}e%^Ve$hp{zJt4?D|mvYgUOS-}Ff#@1y)-U9saB-*()^ zO7%ZBr?f7`r*}h{X?q+E5cm|MlWXm(PW~|@hH6uX)S3Dxl`Z5i81Hxt@PAEdmOcXc zZT|27{`3<($Qz#lQ32(Yo1e@S6$X$1wu{*J&>p#7T)Xy(-d_H|L1q-Fqp?mLQ1JU{ zDX5%B>f#`wm#Wg}gj8G+pC`V)suQZklXf3zrydB1j zVo=rglg+WreKIKnF`@nJuz&xnPOv15z6+iwNRS}N>Vvm9LlkITmRO|x` zj;~|?zgp9JPm!;BUe;r;^O8kmWx=FKHDBntk0;{(%NE~2|GmI7Vm>3~W>gl^-{>eh zy2b!zwt{1eCN(fjk`DDM(`FFrb5IYejJ6toXm+%4^2E(Z9)&fMxPJ~jhIJ0zjc@dB z&_6ue+I%hQPB*Vp{fu-+&n(}ZxL$n9DRBozGrE{$yMNbwb#tCRWInL)2u+;8LaI1iCoHKvPf&+5l(L&4ps?wT(xfFzq7rx_s$B`8 zh6=t@Drg@M)pkws^&i^d*#*#P@cb*PPm71`*bHd&{^xuE z(ks_*-TIV^ep+&33CGj7-l%%DG6aOKBoNCg3fE>^kzHj^*M>kF_Z$|Bk_(zHUQ<^6 zjzpwPKlrqXN{zqTEJ;Cm+5nNF5bX|j+(;QB@cOC!>i-wYa1gN|9sM4>y9nMyoJ7xJ z1i=~_r4IfF*MHT;<8ob}{pX5OwVd_s6V+R(Kp*_~TpHguu3h`$h-*qYy0rZulsLw3 znyV>BmUg@)(YX=oqWQ=c^a*ek?3Ad=gnlj#)E>iF%I}7d&Q;5$n#!tdCePndu=c6@ zM$f%T`Uu>*ZA4Q<^RKE=pJCj%inX-7n3K!NYArGYpMM4+*2K>BYVmt0bjD#~-ZPgG z2PpsNK39U&Xa^;zi1vF^u)tg5Zbd>~4YkYdqSW_iyIp%9#SBahm}yNrq4q~?t+Q3Qs7{~H5x-6W16}g>zEw}`uf0A8wK~c65Mno-uiDkZ-T@W zEWZcEwSUmxH}4lj9jzT^p~-~5ecVud@jB#Dai{1mYK}ygh^l+9S^7o{uK@n=TyFqF z^H$QRhtoJpa4E)`(7shF#H~H2T$D_)DU1$)Rl_c(l*MEwG$PO-2X&pb$Qj{q_9B39 zWCDx?i?@p1zlqLxroj?zkNX1)zHLU@xF+INw13N`2&Zb#H&B;@3VJVcqjbwx;vcftWTMs} z{8HEgc&snJ6s_7*HuS`_f~QK7PqJg4?H-`F2NY%YGdR|{?JovpVr9H&5o&bEEbn{T zj(=UlCMD7A#l&Tz(l>87XLcM3ois!_l)DTM6;IKM;ZcITH&&sLZ_#apn1{+|d;0k; z?I<>N$p~t;Hm7h(V%rmTd@}x-Md)6I!?_x_3Sia%PKo)9uDiq0iko$KsQ6{7iFtu> zw_u~J*U;%R^__{-42xSOSQ5al+77GePJcsbk8g`_I=AV8ZO+_cx@Q~ z=qIYjadvw#S}Hw{mV1^?=_wa!$DpyCCse_B!Mq!?wtE)H63ev`qQ!P?*9&pB$D)j? zU~M)m-~GBTd|hLmSj#LZ-z?i^;qbIDw_r5)#AhxiRdvsrE<9RBg7pl`*?)*v0$veC z+F6e9vJxK|?@}cMu7+1c+v;lZFzd(^e>sue;nN}NM{?G29`Z+h zKi+#7J~-O47Z_o2^Xey8Z({6?`6X^Z$GQc*WHlqiC%cejy_yilrdOl4dBTopO7NDP z1v;OwSdy%5Q3dm-Ahoinrhm3ivuOM&*j5ScFE?^pgma!*#h7Xs<;<9dyQH%z=F~u% zwh?w=Y3%lhsz92SLH$D5h%Dk0I+}m`<3D%sg)^aRaM);B&!E|2c(Q5`KO2@vb{+lC zhtH<;RfsVRln9CwYRU6uh67^;rk{%`anKFyc%o|$T_+=ZQMp4&!qX)i@>YI6kIbfK5Xj45lA&1mC!~Ri(9q&_w`$Qu^+c3 zm4d8}CkdRGIWn5AYd70LrUebJq>8J0Gi&$|6QbYVYuGdn1r)Xw1BfuV!hIENLodb> zB3@g4{3M3RSNQe7kbezvJS(2~O*^bli^t6=-R%6sX^FP3SsnZWZ(O^6?MS1o;43-E zo4uc%CHw(`JUwz0x<*!s7g4U9cjUg>m{CkzibrtTLeA5)zJBZT&yHq#44<$Vx9SJy zZLv)2W;@)|E)bN@8OBow36wx_w{ltmyNiSpo>ARRS6|G9FMr7Sk&f+tPpC|w^pi21 z0at{=#MPl0N>plYub!a?htkaS^Q`FUYMK@e>9#Ep8a_BxBOm4#yYSj!0ZbXj0^9jR zJak{_o5QJW;C!&sQ0G@88pA@S8ODY3jk#BGEP2fNJquMsp2e1FL@`>!!mt&lb~JUk zgK9~ip!A?zkbmf#WLvUJ@wWFpI)P_@5g(ki#j1dTgq1f_`AS%n2S~xb^23RbKb=p7 z{{b7Yr#);FETQ}t3tqW6D_+mboW;8~U&bco|KusVAMCTAr#cdec8lLI8T91h6#Z(y zQe_Y$$-(YUt=kgjFgvn}nya2e=Gm0zu7*icLou`X#(%fn%D2UxmD|j#{5a*i!T|1g zjZb6@a?O!$0g0G1Ye}?I&_HLLxnPrqp<+8_kSG=s(W2i@P_D7b1zVjoY6HeQf{RkC zNt2%iUfp%AXc|F&l*+du(`vIF+c8Ctjxw&{>9DX9<^Uh#r`uls|8Bo?yVK(<%k^5z zvUk>pYkv~klB_vhP^bzfoPd-D3v1WV_q(II@P?R%U7ozkim1LF zIcRr!(pDxYSGukLFxuwt^^d*tw#lINHL2$+@CUv0Cy@wAmk{Z(HTw|YLI*KVgu54$ z06W)_p7ZXjce?O1Sfn!3z&wy-BA9JWQI*W1gnvfnja9JB2!y4|xA7dlZ(%gn!#A4( zEdtL@XxFVm?iu0F+&R|?ZAh!tM(A!_wg~XbI)Su)U6gOrd|oMmsm7_|j8(}44NWmK z-kAt28QEesd~91gmTQU|+6ESDLbn16uJWVhM^K#p1zs}R>FemxhEphn-2L`G(o zG;Pk%LDX4V28Ow(p${$1(h40T^p0u@)?d~TkSLT7F>I4peY2Pe67k`_~ zvxt8cV0Ba;VPaiq{xF6(_QqLrC0`yuECUfN%ph|+hpBlf=S)lPprFzp z&CeJzS&O9A@Nq?OhD7Q@;w(%+2uS#ni5_tDv6zo<$Hz%;K zDYR=J`ekip{H7>SZl(c~`Z1t71b^Egp@W5tDI#ov1J^+ni1(XUxBm}8z^d#17s$qZe9s*+UNE?)VX_XY&j0~!aE ze%eE<&?qT=FNc%z5@nf~HFg8Oe%*;O zZ`)@Z*FAfTH`5RK1^xC<@Z*i!&|~=FhwrPUe##$y_~A)g-um>`Ctv(<~;u?2M z+GAv?qpJLyOU7AH2RN3XcugJ`xso(vlDPAW!($Hpbhc9%i?2a1X1I;U=yT z$tb#A*Q7?^&;*}c_PG_@DOAPMLL&8nZIE(zniWV;RMiZjwD3L7sekh^ym@)#2vt{$ zdri@eVj0i(o);z$d+VSB7MldMmSq?q+z%ooK$Nz9=%& zwUoBzUEg8MD}@W#Z^8m$_w~Sf>rb1K((^`tFvvD4Rj_8PCamhBmZX%WCSZhU-11Q= z%c^C)g(~>BL;N>-SbqlDBPkaQJD+>*=Pem!`~;@60r{}!_x1`kzIyZmOFVE9bBW3b zMu2vVHe`iZQ8$k@q0CGvD6#iqL3g~p_1w+fCABPh=7z@P9c|S%jFwB*`t3Gdh;J zrA)bo9ZJxEX^e!)h;NCq&#F_D?!Ib{E#S_;CS3Sl{mUnUi<2`SY~qcmY0}qM?yl+d zoE6`&pc9NURb0k{(U=f`rDKI=W z+$s;W*o6JuJg*9_ALo=X{KI@u@TpmL)|^o3|a~;za>_Oryg zFGeBy(A-GtLVq`euFT3L%3ThioYn{NT33#aj z{{W!NupaY*l^)UGJeG;{xCtZCz%$jPQP*UyJ9z8bkuEYHvs$i&QHW`lA!FM~BW`c> zae2b?LvaY^9zck1hC$l%-j(SIcY9eq3hRGp4c{@yEa&uw7eqz0$W!*MdEO;FJswz5 zm`5#hn@LGYLlqRoJdvCQzA4T&BCrZ68o|n$5@e8n=Bnr-_ zJDwWIt69z!J5YcC5=-(_5oizA!9A2fD(-YqCVp!Z>6zGyMO$2p7*IiDBPX;@tZma7 z66~ZZzLcLpxj~t4B~r1H|H)jGe}sR2AsmCF^8o;-mk3I#isa?1OOXit6y#aHw)7PF z*?W+UA%~M?ZHCPqn&JJ(u`)G5&@n*-=qNS^z%xjuDVRAh0HmDVRc^?M4lUX_|KToE z+e(t3-MSr{{!|Vf09?2RgXJ3w7ejkjGs$M$U`dK+moj(y)W&1d(EX`o<8sG9bD)vtoram z+R^0=9vfMmqw^eR%d#FB^JeOUmq4ZQ)z9N@LdTq@dYRe4dIsPyf|=u7=%?o8$el33;&AE8;J77V&I(y@Pf+L526;9=Mx z8r0g`2@>YdNsG}rbd6nU$!0WUjLH2d-Lke ztJmMb!7lk*zof|cW!SI-T^oht2t%a;3ue1fxb8W$Q)8E?YNb(Jl*Lf zBk-73(2w&#Q%`@#6>klYI0y!ZISc)ktF8TsV79=vHq(izw^7y6t8M2M+mw2kF)ZTg z*!hJo+v6$q-`Zd}(k|$Z#tr@+fx0sTBY`g*fu211X`8cu8zUU>ZDZx4LEw znOF@=)ik%)BJ>!i;Bjb2!h#pMVqE@JvqF)~J1vk>&U1gC{J3Dow*~2RTzZW_y03yu z13#_BP9IsQkp0XcXY|$T>}7ilczpyw3X!FBP^b>SCe6-!_*6R~cFJQ60iE$^x~GB( z_S6hQQVM$N9<~+STvurV>vUWu_a*qoM_F!bVNM8^*dt322YmoWXG^-3u6z!s_98%N zVk2)ZCE0&&!jux0r$#qi6viV6P~1J|nk?fHahD%)HTbf>jgsdsCa!JG4v2SI&%x&O zo|2O_Y#QNX&)>&CABwkXmOFOk`mLK^99=CQv$&qI_v*Aou5}5!Y~k*5Aes9%1{|e+ zBemL4-RqhNB-mDCB7>y(N3@F??dXloWMB0axAh?vkkaJs4 zn)FvJnb&3dJudh8feo8mO2A(#q`zWW-iZ}eAkGGP%llC&?uW9L0RSn{1GLC z*}@KoO02-4-BK~>w(A6AI7H36JUzU7f>5IDR)~|*=yy~Wq*LaW3%GQ6O&jF;QC2)c zDS2)5LQA4&mKE}4aU<^)Pnq+~3P=KanXP}5`DO7*&I_N0&ID|exqpY zRlSXlTZ#G=|9oNMZ(X$krpTJ}u7GT?k|evc7c0Q|&R#4kg?gO0&bzspF2}^kj+;=x zU!GIr_nqPT_7<=9I?%xDl!h9U(wK`;g*|a}s(SX(;l281?Ery#kj$*Sp&5w?|wg#0csgh?CPJOBfHnX?T2AYS)YBTs|)bH)8Q3T*|e~H?7 ze}G>=#WWfOSa4~B7M&gnHltxyJ&LV}Bu!C1qZJ-mC4TW|0|d5uR;X8Uda}jm3pTzC~LQ202PJ5dn6f5Gs|mOC6qe!O7Ncn?irzAhX^1`N%DFlgo0u z#3DsQDo^QZ!QwdV<%3>4BP7u<me|1EJN|s#`WIM8pvTa==>;56MmEIzdbgZQ!=C^&3|__l@VGk~S#L zb}HW(v6z==YxC4_!b{VJ$kXd7(X`}s; z;KZ~~{wkabsB-);^2xw>DQLDJezRzcGOK&Pu&%xn6t5^52+}Hza})a+2tN!4lSA2us-cRl{yD0l3T}`)(Z`+>&jqcua z-&237dS?kR!`GG7gg@uQ^+c@VipLM}bF~hJNdLyocSXO`>|sle~B{QZ|Nc{EhZ#H|=TFgj|1U z<9mR_q>4y^5p-UPzv!Y>4B8g+hGCK_O5EtH)kYkfAY_1KS-zCqlD~%ZdEX1ZSSqtn ztq61_=a9$n;G%RDaNxtoOsTCw6C$?#)h%S zsxq6k#ijMSwOz9uZ9ss5E}gZ{ynugpj*L`g&hb9x(ywIlRarY27kRN!moDc8mq3YD z=k)IzA*!5I2+LA6OQ5oy7tS~bXJSC9t7&@7Mx*v?tG(|CAv*STu6A8DCX zT_Qk`&&ZW2AQ%e!6tz9}BJ%i$+Srzgae9=BBS zR1}tm(>y2VjceCG69+oYB#zJiR`$4Ve{pH6C`ZvGy7W_iUQ zn(*Dkt;qGK8z7xTtwiWb=6iH;II`(rnuQn|aCQglzamFjBznXLKlB4++WsDp1JK;& zQKI5tDD${HS-@T9d@+9uT8*2`9*CxRBuJejlgGyjcfS;_ zF`G0v#L~n_Z?l+0K@7`7HnblU7!QgCH>VbAg>wEb}9H8J$@*1T*r7yT4h&ac#c=rB~X)trXks~>^29>w%1LO72;Z{TG z1*yFTst)B?y0Z-}M^*~u~G+HJO?iW1n_IZ-&$CNe&N zCCa)`aNn%#q+=y;%I&pmcPRoRGEIhZU!VX8Khle1D=>d;TE?blp4F|VFfSlZf)bib z*7$e!QgW$G;m@*<=Ovx67j@MMOS_EGR;G)Gr`x`7Lf{+k`gaL^kK-xlERA_fzvgP+ z$iXds(ECrFxNx={EmSsx{~zAZk*Tmy>e#Ixa&KDGS=v;f7wf?IWB|5;&EC2=88`xCWi2 zD|RDKu(c{XsA|WQQ^^aVm6x|iC%jGRU?wO8BQ1Yq!}%rjlh@+Y-uRo0b8!&;>o@+j zbg^bUHnsDs>hgJJVsGcAcYs++J1`ZD^0NQpnZEh?JodX7*&QRYIB7@^p;{)aHQv^< z>%-a0dFSc~TXW|bt;xia!4f}?f;ii^Co*OqA|0dyO0lz4UCy^nEZ%)Z1q^0cr6LD; z@`!&hi2$9w6ptA6$pPD#*c=!e%*})O2IUbo3tQXa1+mV0@B&p4u!xW!c$$?;*|L5^ z?5Iz2f<88Ce_7j&vK2rDQ_vywb{ThAKof3NS?4WL%)=wspP+ZA#;$JzAU%kTkAeZS z#LLCsIeH3TR?le@`m&m&cPMoFO6h~<%I1H2dfxJC9QQMdf>sRfzeo@R9EkQfzEgEe z@ws3mp;+?l(L7B(_Y$>-cT`aN$n+47Aa=mwv~l7I$HFA-bC`h_Uu#&wP0KkZnrOtw zsTb|rUOI_Au4%~B+|&uRL>h6Nu?FXIsgf?iVU7n6t(xlc!O{1k!|pHhD=WnR`}-N90(8Fh1Ji7VQq+4vRRi;yrUXmOOCI7*}(<#}t9iseiAp>-)t zh_RWF_5~X!Pg-7xt2t1r=->!~{#<|LqA>j>ZHz<5ba@H_^Ke`GlJx;&sLk?3xNX(w z9c4T>aJ5atu>c$ju}l5Jgi}iL;v3JY*wUadTPS)aX_cUf=iBTU*w zU47hyb}%$)>BQ1wC9gr$mFu@|T{|+@bh_0huQoPS{9vZ!FX9kYZ&D@GH-vvr-kZ=n z=ut9!7A^*b8G+wL!Fl{C3SV?YOCyHq7d9}{Uc&4=Un(*FM2knKsglAt7h@aCZ#mafFE*v29w-=B9_w^S5jdOCd+JmgL=cMk}~}cIWYR8M7{B? zczFlW)Ja6&GE2$iWjaIZ0lDPL`qs0s7ad?*45yiTu_+9gN)-g5FB!q@#O7^g@93)Km`W+h+gO-+ zZtQG*vov0UH{B)EP}+Y5_$Jt~bE~~nt+m%n&pf}KRAf6nEv+F{7;7JXoF^JbA-Z!g z&2~CF&esD#xkA0bHghIGH49IIUS1+{F?YHbD6@9St0C2=QpA7Kk!2No_-Hv5o{t3ub13%U_7&?IhB}AKHIFlNlqi4bwKx?ubSIL+`Y=Q<`dfkVVNO1nves|71f`q? zV?m{4OIrjqIsEtFi5|*aX&YNtSqja?ZYT(?25B`%Tld&rzD&v5c767eDj8( zPQ2f3Rpt?G7;m5Wnm=~1hBN*rbp3n+Cy4zFH^Ppoupuu@5(YU^~9n*^Pjb}yT8XEv0WArhfq`7;&Dp{Sstkb9-V$>qf^{g9-Uegm_qjQ zwTa@Ow0AZ^qmjz@OmIfh*r3?i^v2M1|QJI8NjRsGPonW`Ca&UPQam#VU`IEo2I7Fi!~ zrj`ivpVv2rwoO=&9djZj!jBI-r>Vf2q3-Gio7kfK1KPQ-l ztGJ(zE+!S&Z$jyn=OEz&TPC^V^W)Ofk-?LbUCfNRwxHS7RVP$o(_<1Q0unaJb?<+R zV9YD}ZB2B}WJxFPB*p0gXVq|6=YOa27_8Mq|K$F&Dw zhc-gy9!GGf|Fu`TGUk0gFjGoOFNOmJW-UsOVNE%4W$3{wGtu_^NqtglH<5P1N}jGr z;nvYrqX}=Dbo~={iqbeN_slZ)eHBJM<8H8+SEab%hWiw|XPq<$wc^R7ux)>bB?ALM zJo3xs*dtW+VaUqD9C(F6&jX#|EQGqtJfBbl>*+l**{zWL;5Qdn?krAF?JtV&>EmMQ6_2|1DXqS~xC5Z?=@C}n*MbD85@j`d zX~`rlR3@zM*dPCaO7p8`3XTJ0IqvdAxA^TtLJ-Br=NumItyPkIINg6n@LG^X)w5;4 znUT5;&e)^`OH9R+^Bt;&p_ve|GZkfHmsc!tYJi)UPK}wPKHSiZ#1_bRnmCktjqeoA z*i#`OvMl4&g-pUXW)glF!`@ttlz72;sI1Rk9=-#7iPB{NDCk@iSg<)^Q|iWi7)nn0 za0sJfX7{n9RZuL{)@Faxp17$AY$1^eoGnSVjr*X63MNSKmNJot!=1mEncy1%usCoL ztAi1)#Er3$t0xi)z9Escuo3l$MOcmqP&qL18I z7hh4C*+5i~mdmg{dnv8tP!ishGlp)*_jkVgy13hRpr?c`AH6P3Wx8i4{=_9dK3a<= zJ!d+#i2PohJYRGNZ%J#z{pIYq1TR zA(^xS_rbUuUO**T-Pz$MExZ)G(%1ykFr)fz8*6y zP)bxlk0MjyewRy3D70B`({aT|TZdkUh!{3<`a;jljBm6NA>=I$jvrz$4BikR&WrWZ z)`XT`(F@F2>r93oJVw|F(P7}7sjN@UfX#o7mr;Lk!${G{*|zJVMTe|t+(te?wJENA z{oUiEEL#)_pc^}IaT~;}n=@4|Z0xpVyALAtk*KQ(jU!uESW;btfTvFJ42TcGsR=9D zFbGK|W_X*c#U1WW1i_k_wksI)i3Ci^o=~^|o&m)Y9CXZkOebLUxjntE)@<}-aBB04 zlr?{Axqkmr&M-iniu){p7o<&=YdqcqC9UnAR6Nk=;KtSiIC#nc|bZ|hc06|@1O z$W)m}uOam9CVrEmE+Q1xg1Z8j|iURR> zUZ5Ao#?iuTs?JZx-KNBFVJs5OaTs!IT22|G-GbGzyIeZ>v+P3nfK3Q?E!Qmp9$h*1fvL%+*Z86Ct+8&K(fpqRtKN(abfDa4w{p!nq7gwG;$ykc1O;f2u){lyG6+!)iwOc>mMo?Laou*8C%br%7<$JHjfoFD zL(nc)V!Gt&_D#+*2Tw48d(h)i01$tL-^@Fvz~nlrY%-EMnk&ap)mL!a7&ve{+)*>X z?29Yq*}u+trpCW-RLX5z=BwS*pnKy_HYmyC(y7FXrguWLiaHRrL-S zlXu-pEyEXPg-JS!0nG*$0l#9V$=#}0)lj%mA9yKl%nzB{Fb~{M9XEkQYBZMI*kxlq zG372Dm7O|y&AOmzv%yl={gi*FBcVF)R`B;cs;*lvuOF#Vo>%!^S7V4GI{^6o+i&px zefR7jn+9!a^AtjK4}>SR0gg2BC^a+Y z*~GZC1Zr>ZWjfF>j+nmIGSZ=kv=RLg8>%iSAIpg7$+FOL*2;lzD${=s`Vj15LF?zh z=fruP5K65;oM?Tg_Bmru*+i$B8gnxUm=#Q`3KUNkw5p;BKzH_HRZpizzHyuOgxS=W z>VQ(CQzNc}3s!lJGK`?_xoF?G=Y9h)_W8ZN8`rK~n<>-Tam$@8P8-$PGp&l%*-Hl` z7?lAr11zq5)3z&Y$UA=<_cNHbzoU;iZ`)_|3T3GDjfZe+?c3!5ooY%IG2r5Kkbz^8 z>%5JE)L~;_WF8B1_`FUBRK-rRS=sRb&9N`nYjfXszjlmwx+%B){Yq-Rl3kPQN~8Zn z5Y0Kr75+Z}00960?0rj*9M_fRUkS{j!9r)zr1d0)@qnUei*A4F0Z|^KXG26r-psmW zWJD?+C6-rS&aAzi0UEur*amuL;hlFX^dIS8GUq#wdv8P*X;(ArmP%?gTCU2*PEK`jaSO%;sX1ITBu8Dei5{8b^m!7ueBu5b!aOl)||>1%BGW z7on$yWn=k1^`?K^n6=*BdI9jJ6OUfQ-4D90r1l%bo-^?2~>mS|a&U#ekhI<&9`kBAUko71+K2H}r=YC`ZYqh}6a&ft# zMv&~nIH)-|7D1Cy#(|b~4b5S24*QXn`lBQArH`LaUAgkj<{kMMFPz(bPKS~Glny}s zfZzI6`>nF0_=RTN%HQ+#X>ISa~A_U+Bjjo>Bi`9NJIMb|-)g?)`g9 zzw-9#9o;ew{^m*9Z0G~yRr-!H$!-YmcwX7B@au0pQqjWPmfee|cqjduU(rW>4}TM^ zi~ssxo;~}@t@Z9ad-m+>wtD~Whwr@e?CzcS-lebZ-TOd4sQ#Tt{ORvg*;Q+U6v>uJtr0wwBu#Br2K9G2^zY7Gu;n0nSLowzw`# z6xf~7b6Ia&xMYmPg8H@_5{uYGNo0CKw77pqXaGe)Gr)^X(oFxD@=O$9BHU+y3Qb7- zwDh$oT;txcgf!cW@b#MuU%xPqb>B*6HyqPnSuxh9aLon?j+}kGsa>Nuz=y$vfJ6}A zmOuoFs`|_nZz6-8cRbt1|`>lLI%in)j zeuppV?^9ukNf!n?(1^kt{1>Sh-NcC38k)X0Z5!nM`ddU>)A_%mqxvaegW=yXsZ{lLsMj>s$pAN z>fJO-Cq7nAQOh132IbO^9P9_3;t7I~HiiCnm@4aoZrQmKt^vHK;^Wt|HR*rZvV>&I zw#P}E3qI%S%>|l^m?lsX)i$kIq2p?j48mnR9ZyS2E0${PR(0p!4ft^1j3vuo>&oVt zE{mogzWG=_r^G})0bAP-c6V=3P-dnhwiHNVqLlZXc0WDGjbj?TMQhcX>SIvp_cRHE zGd8eCPZEZBwl(qe!LJ_W3Ce#@-PRvJ&OW&jHg zj#q+b4t0{vx4^3$>p=rgR)LQGtT8!r+RK_1SaxgmouaH6`;@1zhpvC(lIf;UBa`s} zzOw?$=mWhV15QTKEtquK9Ul;h1%Sxa2Bjm`^M6VEjn8m363BStP2VA@niK2qpEN{z zq9wwTpp-0eb*QKhQ7mj>{z+ez^=m657GD&x0Nq-rZOu7u)J@Q&fJ+Gq)%n*#JS0|W zbf7~)jK)kF*~Y&!O;mp#ZR$=16S|TVbmG&MCrf+cB$HuGJ0-#X)Qh5MyBioRQ|`Q; zW>s?P-7Y>+xf>B6vCfBO+Kgn0iaqzlFU$dFzR%Rv^80_ z^u0tBy74%PMt>^in7mOF_H|}73sL1PjG!rQBkRomma_*4=yWet5JfbjBvA(vfLq;2Wi4xq%HT2`|bP z`i_2syYYWqov4v-=*<OHynpijlPn;g}%q{)fLxO2G?Tv`?%2#MXhu_RUEL2G6l|R$5$ZgtP zFM@1;(hC`aZtGqTG;LZQKJt`Bs)ZzF%o`0Og%y8)b3%*grqh$rnny(Vn^mZBxa9J3 zn4)mv=CJnAf@sxBERQZ2-p`>7T6R_eFn9?(*;^lJQ`hV;sF$uqI%&nQuCG9N6XJK( z(WYrf4!Nv;h?ror`8>&&XnrN1@%1X+Qxj|nMbY0Nj%D~y)U?HPpu?pltX|l=bD?uy zK}LVbZ}TtE`KivDVKk)S$psKG)XFvPXFPoHY>tBsuqFvrPU&rFA6aolA!vfHraSLKpE z-7fr;eG-sGSPQXidWBYX8%10JN7gZv08vJtyyPN5ZC_g0E1|bjW++hrPfBqe^pbz- zR>q%T>2DPqZsFO){IWUSl4me{h-~&Al@@-f^mrntk4weW~mP;6g^m zz`_8d3Shkmn&In}$eOWKW>x1Du!wqeN5^tm*(^a25aMQC8gKM!SPI&xS#xNyc0yg8 z|MNv+O;U`gVI1&g{5@s>_BAgRUY&pJdBz|%y5onCK)d|qUGX~mL_I~{v;#RF>l$lB z6$lxWNW-vgXV8XWIEQrUp=u(#)ntW+)QTdOaq2~W4c=r)PGGis;`Jm#605Lcq;|W4 z=$&db!GapF08S!Dz2OV}G@(4cpsi3CRx-XR*mS4C8ZN7>TGR|DU1Al5*>`_9I=AI> znPFFGBGsXM=EPWfcHPv;JKb9f{bh-uLY7Fc#YUW|Q(S1gW(@YK%EapNo`RQ?vy4@} zI@I^}CR=1Zvj~w6_=fq+0%gGg7sR9?YDksc%{c?uDek3jw{9|nUhSbPXXufWvt6rb zi{N9KRke#VyB#e?N`cP5W8r@QY#`N(n*78%9yz@gsUUY3*R?vAN#>&|PHqwNTZom* zy{AiY-NuN4^7}}8F!|ScvU+Y#2}&%@`XsCb08bGJJpH;|{|Y&Sj62 zJNA>;r?VE!pS1euv$mW&BzHTXwuyffIb;J&THpZ z%d&crr!gn@DC6o%1`B@@tOBf!9$n8NPKsIauIU`8R&(G;o}-1qxW1|UPI2Tr<#350 z`jYmiA@fzTUqK4;TIjuVG*=wxlzbiOv=@Tsr^HewmK zF3FlvV{^w z`er*rlt+{(w-WnkH|KbIFjB=U(`i2}teXZVvLwKUKnyo1&Fg>qG_#tlr;LlmEEKcsOhx%* z-Vb!At1g$-edyUtQfOQCeUU)rXWg{m^ZuEKRa)^&swc{^X8OLXOC95W|EDCzxXBXw z{x8L?+^vMC=dY@<69dtx>##^D4tY|ayZ1i$@Tj1)j!Gy_77W`>3~qu*PNMEQ?(2S8jD{z&sE)`{tYliAH)|igZcLsxKGw z-kv;02~K~ug}Hec8ui0fB?WIH=(A}sT5(I)8&rP<2Er1*7B;!U?U_iayymwVYf`n0 z|4M$9*O<=}GlH?SvDNxJf6tcs7@dZ5Sj!gGh~f6^KJ@Whvt zw$yF@@dg#Qp9`quQNQajHW-VC<<5h<*>AJWE$-a|@*Zv>Xd~}jcmBswILXLHIW8N{ zeCmGt{)f>5YAG-^7t{<)A*PR#u>FK(*$aQZ2LCXXCIAbNu z>n`UD^!5)ZZFJ+GZICovp>F{u2;CaSoY^m=y&M~JYPp4#f9lcWi9V+F=(Qn~@kTQ-933pzg;t@= z?tZc-`X|}}9q7!o2F2ncol6%TZdGM4kkMA{)}(Xj8dxkxrZOrVlN~UasK|4$hhA;K z!KJ7nI9XA_o@tZKvZs&F#%6Q;@MM3ii%(0SVS}1Q&WvfwBMW*Wn)~L-n0|ie?$3{y zwp9xGkz&R7e~M?8aB0_QbCr{yP-*M+2luC$4ir?JLJMfSuedekYa6$^;v;<5NKxr` zHB0)@vgS9j3S!2G5b%*A8yobSGsS*LCduNXZi8`U?iC0o>Hy$bY@k+FY=s;dvQmXuIdsS&` zX3Ub^aXu3!_EUH+!{;w(-^EBGJgbPo=5&JgjBD~*N{D8Fz>F74d?>a1F72?;l0E#M z;&4%Rf(jlJ{#P%Jb=X2tklufF?b;jdHie#-E1`UzPS}Q8TtH?|S0ROAkyL000V-&8 zMCAsY?vIh>@zl@h0eXAZkR<0Z5Ke3QF9yAlR{PhPAro-OYwb73tcM;t7f~pkiHckn zXOjAj^2c@~6`=^W8s!4c8~fNsx&7`$)XXPf^Ku2ED$A?UqFxlKO1gjOkwAN0+C8-7 zr=(3_515)0)pSkfOr&drglum?YQlvMM>Z#t(o;FcH1KTN!gEV#%Eos8)c-#X&hZ|%boMFNcNXL4N-(= z#^Sc@pb8&*fP&rNJCT2J4V}L_ZEF!>;sIbO`ZpTVdVUOm!R9i#o}$Q2F*2fFC;ih! zq({|dQb$M^HZ(fYsj!}H6U5O}+dw+FJSt|*j_vl6g6oHXvzl!a54mt1VtJjX|K=ea z#J<{LJ`}PtrvrIz8lMXGKwqS#}u%hz?B!G8(f`9)fk^Gl|19#f{;`_f~K!oTk zGA^d$nOBwMAHIKloTtI_5ALk^GU>ZLmVnoGkf_Rg&0l?y>6*WCRDdTQK+at;+sn*_P05|509FP;KVZa43&g9i3{qI8tUpin{2#O`|e! z(ul%2+;9s7f+EtrzOHd{BF`LZ$t0&b@X5MBbVt(zWjTMPtMIJ4Ij60OoK+={d}rmP zOnQVYIY=!foL>4@Mt#2N00j+u!Bt+5G=$*?FptDAhxNVk1cIDbDZK$LMUK-||D(HB z8AGEdl8s)-@CE=UtMl(P1vIMu<2tHmHB#r9)~p~66EXyAKZ00{=VHGqf^S8jjUha# zxtc=1SweqkF^j9(%V0ymbqz^Rk#PxZ6DFa0B?)rfnpX!v`zcvcDYOE@rK+M>#1pdq zY?4A}yb16Z5b9^1Wl9Bzwn#&)J)z3wcWqjV61JS}35kE=N0KwQhiwvOZK{@MA~~6oUuAzJ z$x+TzFj2DLY)o{7^YzpD9~a@BA!sEAF|dW8p?0!vP@;G zD06?NO2O3el0?!Fk%Bd3*~5xmJtrEIuHloE!L8?iEOm60x#&=dXAf*Y{Jd5uKXVc3 z_E1DCh%~WBt*5-ObEC?XJ*eS<^>p0%cDN2y(H!Y32!o=7=Rm< zA02J_4k5(*w&s}vE}N52!Qi`n1pa7YDG}8bA#)X8G#;wT^fq3ew7$KGYUdKr6p5R& zV*w=3;9`BO@SOv<;%-iO{gRR+j8lIZryEp~4MxE~0 z13VdkChdffJpEEs#yeV0+*%k-X^wH#l%gAq%a%tv8XdW%rC2~QY84b3-OaY52$`6k zaw3v(F}bF8fFT!nBxNP53WK8czO;>3t62|!aN0u5Sm(hq1iYAH0x930v|oYR zc?vGH$Gz%-fhj1EG(gd?B7-e;AnI_e>9-?J+OC)7DPpZ1)t;`S|F;()Bd z?CW0 zb0*NXMWc>w+qP}nwrzhM+qSKaZQHi(q~qjtorn8y>->jZYger`=NRu<>O|K4*4PFS zRz@=v8Sxc>sc9gIl6Lwga;*&Wi8t=-?zAA;nCT|Ip7btE>)5B^oI0J@8LV3}i`>j@ z>D7*+xvP-*h;3L>;aZRf_IN(qZH}C+8f|Z@X*SMBkpWfj9Xas5^fcg74*73Ydnm@v z5G`)!CY~e`4oEyzikeX%RHQeY_;}Aje^492VM;~77RoOfTvwZ2u--yH-$;4dCaR=n zM5aj+6`q71w!R>_rJz9@acx-CGv2a-EwPi!O#2w16fM(g__17rG_;Qdfy&GJSZLE# z!eb-)L2eI0vBWYr-+#+#0$elo3#!5Pl4fyBa8heCf%QWJA!OOGqo49k7LuiQ|2=l` zQJPnPgTJkVlwsFv(Mqi+XtR~I;(8N}lqo&v&TE|Sg~P4S+wGt~|Mb6VcEposYRyRF zNHJghosN$EFiB?LZ0`X9H(N?j$rbR|U8XdISK8r>8mnLf3j`i~h0rKcri!asCyH#cq1)54q;_ECqGnuR{x-Lm8 z?8=T_Pal>hOCwveO}zS4&2Uiy;4RPH&|Qbpla3oAO12NER?a zZ`2+!#cv}@Aw%Id(jX=}D6o;NEgfc2^fZs1xjSeiqGIZi7>N`1ljuhqVnot?>@o{T zb+d(~ceL`_oo_4$b#`LLAK4Yj>%~Qjus6@$)$t@H2E@fp)6)N;--|z83|;5nX4|Qc zW}!@W2OO8GG+y4l2_7^9nWdC}p(y~cMmr@24(GwccUxm8#bkTE{D7y)+5Ad7t?mOM z1>%;hH7{}5rDUwdwKRuv{|$Tkqni^BZ*uhapK+Z8lq#W@eCRZq=k>1fS2WU@mT4FG zWnY94@XWhD_6En-K&km$K~H}m@@fh{?d+l~5ULe6cy1YGHtmpb2nSor9}aTBkN+CG z8iZ<^p%A$bOMSD**wdB*hf5BB;K&-N*+^^{J!5BwW1Rn;TDaT9syU5u#5+24$lg>6 zze&HK8G2lc=!(~F?%xRfk23?Q-5eJwDPuvX*-HODBW&TaE~v-k<_w10HIC7s*~J}B zXlkJTH@!KuS9xwMTk-(%VOtD=0z}c#9o~4%^7I!g%_Rtu3Ykp3jLJ`=6H$gxgN^6Ae;v0+*^ zocHeWgCOJj>rh&v)5aM3BfH;+Z4ZKwsKK7B!q$=v*|Qh%JP7jIz&Z!@#NYiv2WoT#2;PB>au{*89jj#ul>~S8OfM z4@LkKGbSweDGAfQ`?&tYLi$U&dV z)@d!>W5ygjGAWHU(U zfCDh$({cP+#y-5&j+*U-yB75m!{0c41{{0c@B`G?4p>av$RuX~Zef?wOi#2+m5F** zEm4Y~mIxB;&cl{VijVMeJ)>nW{aS~tP_k}x@-vp%qzurAp_d4Ps9v7`a!(id*X~=c z+=B0A`3V%a$L+SyspX1xdcCtMb=->i4IIpvBT(B%1p;V#;~in@7}(3PpcD$E);YaLr~D#5-D~FE`(-EW zmZ08PM6x;wpE6T+YXbI<22q2vMDfrR#J1%y8P0Wu^b+55xaL_r7^yCb)X?r+{fw4_ z9Z{ArXz3M^xCj)w9n=cxQEIe`(`o^4RY63rT7)pH!|%*Wvm?Jq*^sQ(_x&vy%}=Yk z=$%Q7fWQF2U(KK{8w%Oq%?_VCL*fty@`(3blk0mR`psG5sSsBQoxa}|NShD?%nmey z>l5j|P)%_83ImBJ z8eHV_2}2-q*=p>SV51f(f)$k4<#U?1(UlwK{J(;K!z{~XfuAN$X37XLPIj0vf1QtJ?802x-S)klAo%!<;1>FUW{1me*6dcz}42qT*%Gcd*&2OTpx$z=%t zBUI3LCsl@XK`+a6me&upCMBIU=+gH|HvJYLhy#tx%F5KG^l2?vpwL$96Z zex+&3mLKD91u}0Xif_rE94iTHBZ1(OdYIh`AI3p`ExAF_0SJ=dClb4F(KVxj0o+&U z9G)S>D__^a#L3kWR=aj+;w6}sz4*F9WM2k`K5>!t(9xcLs|@M%mkSmOI`$B@s5EFm zewb{9G<@h~x`VTPI2XjpQ-&)UPKeQO&?n^WN;@5^jTqR%GM^J66mBWUgsH8qN~0(5 zygL4C?3D{3@pb6D-T)W-NXMs)X^Im$<<~ZjtN`hQs98)|8$U0RO1?pCg##nmpNxt*7=85BbOVO#Np9PL7Z#}>s<{o|fS!!HEV-sf(lp}wYcXN4<%&K3THXcM-GbU}E}IM1 z0t%izM%Id?-m7u0qEzMqzx5X1-9`RDVj5dnu~gc|TPR1GCHOtTBNCR*EY#*nAfKZ2 zaWZ^eA=p?x*`9-T3fRDL7F~_5U`N-uk6!R%cX`Zi5c0GCfv_0_POk@gMh9^|WzSFt=W;s2S`wN#QoE$zouf zvUNjt38IXH!-WbUtBf@TwhR8yJtFZWgz%IM*N?kSHW=6y))2A+&Os2B2t^V2alN`t z^X^AGox4X&NinB35F97!OkqRvEF(Qjc)~W9)j&WyiEH8r%4h@1N#@nL#q^sHqon9> zFA{O0)K(vq7=q|ONy&;281@l{PG<_3kEwsI*>`m1Xfu$0V>TA_ZWm$PsMfM3aryRQaUtS4rP4_nH)4??MAwB1Ux0P+IXua93hxX9QSa4Ury;a^~DTZ zH3d?*v65MdFh|2%`_t6otmmX9SKoRc!|-)m&DF(N?3pqo*gDgR>gP)UNeJ!8AIhxP0~E-o4;u_> zC(W#^Tv;deu>1x9!SU&D!`cmqQ{r+O8qINWQZLq_@dYwz(a(FJC9lF(wLmw}rLuLf z7jwkjWLkwIu$Opum_n0XU5=v@)qVwOnkZ62?4u%OkAbwcTo(06HRaBvMt}3UX})p8 z!|gn~G`ku=6EOW!to*Zf0hQ$*^B^NQ)vp@~s|>4UP|NrWd3ftT2y+M8vH0J3_6 zO!B{|=Sq{Zy{B1W5aDrkIqc`^{;d@%!4M2AF4*z9Fl`P#y{~Dc#nGZ|=(l2ZH(Fq_s4AYZ0ZuQ0Ra$HC<+IcukTOiq>ujJy5V^aF|?;H*a% zQ&kB8Qh_a0xviAP)C^IWvI5ImIymK2Y&Ib)==s3m{8G6U%`xmWwN;lkG5%(g)rX&w z6LY*}IjO68t=kK3BKJBQIJGp2%thQnOy1vmD~g|Ywh>B8dsW~5_rK!F3@4WZ`3fvp z*;n{O`^O__@LBzJCT8!iEzH~!WyJoQ4gma%2T005@uR~zFfj?WnORNE6F(DQx7T^b(%Xnb&9O0o+Ur6Iwn>Vk zM3`0zPQ4uEAq%ufZYf5(Yxtt>lz_0z2g*QSXBHft;~*h@)s|9ZeG6?+xe9u4Pyi|` zU_OT)7&fI;Z;_JHgeesGWVl@+h}^185lSPT{Rr1szuZ}wzy+bP zsA0wH7kGSH%qz3kKu=;Xx^9=yYyvG~okub@e%kA{va8>PwfrL7U8u(>jpyemQnc)r zMyA{jj9wz#P&=?q;ObN6js*>Uy#WhGzx340JhbV{C1&+M>!DSRXauw+@e zJ$hMw?MU4+G=yIVPjsB4`CK7uGY5Ou6f0SEh)mk-%+Iy`CCz2DO2B3H83A`)L7 zx)!QbR5V@#p{V&sg#cOdj+^6HF{>jK<3SO%erAwxiIKd(<-=tu3Og90ewDY)A9s`3 zRSLjx7UbTaM-9Fx$K)vnrKV`Ss%6c_Tcq90aINDWp-61CwrJ_!raInGmR>}VCmql4 zXfV1bs;h8)v#4Ag8KI3WeUlfTooKCCDwvdqEFT;;5;vY0Y119M|2!*5+sj?9U(^8!{W zidRVT4d@F;&~A}t-QdL)v#Nkr_(YY#1g}T>S?1}80@UOnU1}C@Eng}baav@__1dN& zf7;fErRtDa8~{Bx5-`Z|A@x<0y?l19ul>alMDgoO& z7ng4K^cCb}DZsax1Ek*ba!dC$v03GDL^knuhW5`005MYagje!s8*%5ptHEG@b+;`b z)$Rl2wdwyNssw;Ws@5i&|DR9={EMi*{O^b=@}xuD+2hUizl7>w%pk-$a#SY_n?2Aw z14wKkhXOJCG@4vD(@c@QJSs8}{%~BwL60FrFzpP#bR-B`7@EHmkc|Yk?B3t>g@>UU zWDn+%bQRIG83*l+MD~ZkFnJqOB&5bpAHZ#p$Dg=>vLORQxNfOMX8A zPW`oSlyL}L)ZGCMJcCK zdrkE{G??8wra&fxqvzTM9ylH* z3_q-JifDwa`yz}vs~{(&VoUWO|9R-E@8D4A3S!Ozo8?~L* zu=vCky}miry~(E{hUr8nIIrTA52%ZeAaF$pRUc((DBC@?J!rKF$e%@2I_}(5crEIL z)-N@?+=_ygxIHx@88b|eZ<&aVuo6Spu{1rm|Bh?No!{l2SS*}IH_=C|w#4`V8pG@RZ=>T*gzg(${zW4FC zn;0YR0%@}1w?!m0DiY0k7_D&R4TmGCPJHO+&{ixu#5i79I?no+F?GKhO!|PAN+kB} zj0pwYngkA;e)?WY0jgYs8xg$=FhAe@{ufYmM+fzW@K0&opGxq

xnSvLVdi9!*=$H$`dNZ%S2XdW@miwF>1wMjc>lOyAcn6`md0!z}FG6Eoc*58g5= z*HYCM8{y^%C)MNRn?^W(OkEPb6w z@#BZ+MA*^j9!0YUxO_{@>-ao>GS8%iA%#H4qkuApzNN9vRr@k2A}1$QDLXm-VK*j3 z$>KGW8Czc&)&-il_u_G1yQa8;@6%r>k!oO3Zp4E1%WODbym2VDF!KTWz^yVQ)(F!m z|HohFGcS2m;P6{r3}7=37FO&6b_>NN-4IO=_P%YW$@?8kVPy)!IhSN{uID1R^wNR_ zvLqu(f3lv^nP)1<5^4}0f_=E*Z7+8iO62{l{6j-v575;x%B`;?Paqh6(hK{^7XA+DdixxHfM?Wzpm# z{d+-B;jY!L^P*k3#|9I|IKTha`&80At4sX-P<#}i3RjKksRU@%>y5+g zCobyVzA3&Y@r&{FwA?Ud#ao0KUTq!lT_nFwE~zJ`)D6@{n%N%)D;&p?86AOh)k54w z#&MxI@v0__j0CsE--&zoSbKox01WB^eCeCiOm})05Nh0f4X(<58KV#X`lvDR|Ldvb ztIK{BR+2gsb)bRJ^ZjmN;0yRWrx|f9Nf3dA;cCFBJ5A+-l9SJrR=-Zl@v>yia(pnZ za3p#jb!u{|v5{p+ioPJRI$t4r9C!lpd3Uxq#fiOdjsR+fjbh6u2FH@_*nk&+F-POj z_}RT8HPFhCoB9P~Z~*WYban15{nV4{|4Z`X%(2pK7$MqYq2UBst>4-O}uc#Pl+ z=F#ulwi>IiDFU|y3GZ7E6bbmg+=H`?Vmf!IeT05}_u=YmZ$JsPdppp9m9nIH=Z4sA z?9$Hw7y{K6z;Xka-T+`IQFbw49Zty@PboAUW{-{k7L35I3Dv&9li-+y9^c#MuonJL zC0VR;@wZ{*9NXf2k&n2D*`Fc7lAO#GECJ-%Y_lDhn!_?>7Ug5; z9vY}TNx>uCwj2w*ztYAy`1`}8C~SIr2O+y)RC>wEoVwY1IYIF*`$sLgQpz|pRh7^C z+;nn(F7smslUj=G1PzXAa$qfJe?F(HG85|qZ425b^0Yw0GB`t3c#VsAajCfN9E$vm zYR%O!bH{%vWCEsF7%$`b%lkixZ5On!HXANBtezWs=qRUw;B@;1pavv*xC?ZDZn}L0 z!gP?rkfb}jhQm^dlA0(Fzyy6(Z@4XfA?k@|B+K8wKXm>XH&htmRXMUMMW)z zikP!Njy5kztWY%*gG)%HX0U#jZ<3tTvxzRCOfZXZQ2-R=2Kp#6_Ck6x56~srjLJ_x zWnx+#R~%S9%PZyoWhG&$nX)lab+h0>KN8wNimrnAOL?>}`G@)H94fhrza{?2EGj!N zYqWNnwZWfre~zv2#1V^g4%qWx6%x`IRiG*!0S{ZM>1y~6$A*icx7Fz|-c9!GT0an7w-4*8glS$|K&R)KWX+dRilmG7|srI;pbc6&- z+v@Q3g_TZN6bgIxGFY_nm9uGz(fpd8w>Qi0*c^a>SnstuS|)8=p8vy>CFvjsaWI~&PK*53&Ci%70*d-i@IqBilaXBtH6ucmB)rmI+JPqA!4HSmL`CR(gg zR-yT8#d`qHJB*(jm(du6jNH5<+l}kMb_39n`#|2M=pZ<>J_P@SnQRmmaM^rDJse6^ zo)+mh97~(xGP8gplRNf0@kp2en6E${D*M&a2$Js$1+hLCUkBe%ZsXfEe^~$F=PA!P z8B^B-CMK<^xE@>BD4$QHz@uR>N5=1W%UX9$3b57G;hL#2BHTwIEbG&_8D};tsCK6m6Y#+lm&P74W_K_{OSuu3e7AN zpYbV4zD|LX@`yGZCOBQD7Ua>rL4z#qZMjLw#-7V}UTktk#^`mMzNmg}v+11{==hXt zw01%qVERO9wR^m>l_lIwA|(uwU<4$I*6_7F)xWpT6*a*%@Vv{1_L=o4!{R5jsWYuojzX{4KoX%x=!PKryJIwqkg`%dK zUpWEgZZ~lHb(9Si9Rs4@LXU={yOwt56iE`2Pk_J&#D0i#J7RoofK4W{3=yQx>L-}V?miFlgkkn z|F`G?1Du~6nRUc_1R%3*aB9=OzKV*(tQTB%x zy(x3^#C8&!&E!z%^uQh^ZcMmOaUSSpA;6m{q$P6hMKRlR3oa!@W~spHF~51Q2{AXi zB*?lK9fR*>)}3vtuz_#?2$UH>d9SfA-1@*ie?m}&gX>k+eWs{z{G+DAhKUlmuOHTQ+=7cWG)&46FrjY93C2iVVKch~p2hE+MXho@ z8vY4f|G@STeXjJRQ~Q2U``i9@V{&~OGxOu#3ID2Eqk#| z%DuZ#4TuaR;O6d@-Q}(eH-DEm!2{qO?)4W$k7Uqus4DhPsOt73!#dAZ7BBm@xZVLr zxhTa}Ktt)GQhdtbUV5Kfsr)fV>^ECefS}AgW983nLZWy;hy)1Dh=-t5xnefGLrx`a z;!?s7G=VixaMOTX(1456V7M*HehBZ}WlJMgLbZ~KIB1{%PW4S?Xb}0<(*h`R<`IK+ zYPxAgH_y33YRH=)`;_$WG3kz?w6fsHsU)hLueYqV)ESuhnREOk3k!A~Pq#xH;Mfuw zCq`wabP@KBrvUECTFh8WPFeGHTRlmo_#rV>A24o|Wg_j~ zJEXJ%_FE~TEIBhYf(&*(GuN;?jL9pIY=%Gbkz6c4K|tYiXnEmK3zs8solDPh z8EPmgE=E$p<)l4uG^*Dk&z3wiNji*^fhd%Lo0-$W#{kf2o&9%fy0r})tOW7E)fCOL zoG6FeH3%~f@XUbyc-d$N;9NI78o{4jWjX$oQAF?RzRZ9k<4)M>8x z6nVXaZNR_bR@oX<*BtiHrq4llQy_Ir)iyWjSLb4Eno0=WVxl4Sz}aWI#rD^wR9%D- z-ZV4|MNuGP2l>qVR`fnr2|a0ph7R4ls={&<80cXvZc<^@S^Mo54dov3 zK`MDQag>ZTLT#odUm4%eWZyA3T~5k@h+=r31z^FF5-Ff?FI1yC8Xeecg1thGlzMn5 zTCTx0DCms}rugAQp3mCEK5Z~mlTnXK9)fZ@Q9(%-D1KEQQpU1S;UO*&%}96g(sxmL ztLy2PFKUs}da;^~M)e(1>Ev{%Urd8?l= z3$tvsY#$=x{=P7Oj)qVuTKmn=usN{OCQd}g#@Lm*t>@JK?2w3f>vnFc6U_Gcy6P;R zKdM>;AXeyIM^!DPx{spW)JmxW!TyOfh@;A|(%4p8HLm zT6o)NC*osig*I{-6?@`DCa1-{UL$b1Upc*Yk@pG|kVwQJQ?m<^O_lb$(m*G1A!6Eg zI}1^FU~1U{G+&q0lL#uJR4O~Qp^B8COK8=eIj*FU#>7O_(^ZmBgWl5fqBR-%>irHc zlh+F#>)enOSo8|dvgiQ){Y`Wt0!}I^;Iia`yeuVqCI~LqBESWB4qkG$ z!V^zuYSM5Q%5l2Ii!v0Enp8PU0TD^g1*I?gwRaGSlri264o{-`yQ&sn!Lwsw21KtB zI>XoA0jEghui;r;AVZWY*{m<@J95b|IVVbLgOV|Hd`2$~n!}Igr?fm?r?n0=+YfdO zvh^gJ8m96!$>Q>C)Rcz~ z;I1A1uFt)`JB4(~D!_MNG|KNm|Bg=+-$hQ!xx4)nUy@meWa|BHf*h>96>UGDfF-4J;XC-ejblb0oX3v9? ztTPrRN(Zwp;NH+ueDUGS1DTm*qWRbGq=QCWj801V&3_q=eZaQZyzkG?j@F$px3;XI zv=eRnt=Jd%Pc+O?_cWh~MNMkH1jmYMmhp&_yw8pomZ+Md$tt4YF}0uhU(LsO93A*C+U^gTsn)f8v_YZoY_L!9=(C66pePN| zhQ(7|d3zr_ua+b?rzR~0G@L5hA~tnO8sSgZH5)$4#Ngt>0X!8`UBl?@q&LVj(Ou(L)C*o0It(9(_d-5Uov zw?ricB)|$%+O}BI!+c^9Ru;>yNNx`lcU$yYl?p$RQpH}lp2eIJ*e0?oS? zOEZ{m9PX;6LIh8~+^0Ae~q)E6Jybd}%JWaR=pw)oH>;U0I|k za2>7U?c=V*!_FDTqAFEF`Eg|<(xR7Lr1|Eu6F@LGf;%2VKYc9w)cTj+5m>}@Os@Mc zgO39eT+}=06N%|l}Qsu9^*lG7-9jvCDR7ajB;Nrl(ys3U-6j5g{{3{~9buvAE|Y5CEO9LM3EvqQ|W zS_4*}8}%&#yz@F`HZnG|aAe1Zo*V{m{s^)D!QP*bAz>Z9<{(mpJeXu6#e4@e?1nHH zRgG)@S=SdOMy3gV0R;Widq%i6->^UuF~Gc9iV9dd>^=xX$OpVPqy_i)Ka%!Ty98id z=*&psXFAC#ZunzOZg}=~t9!6JQ(?m)%AnQqy`O{Du}|0OWhRH`iP4V)_GW@(ckbPO z#8aLP7C3Cj!IJeF6})8DZs7D7Nl2|Wn`vs!PFgy4hn!rpK8Q~=u`ue1TOs+Me_Tm= z-sO!xX3PnK(Fsu0br$n$h?Ss9llkC{bYtOd^o!=wmqIukdFfnfYKQCB*1spISiyD4 z<}i*m#xzL{pdCu4ni%3eTvFvKR7_pTWA9|+c<(?6i~Wt~lw2QM(ZhHeaWV;!oCQzO&~RWoKo z*vvMX`>{u29cbLus)mZ|U{}_YT1!)*aBY$gZb6>zMHU={t6TTX>@M5}ci8Z13rRa zuXY%*r}%nhd`7%`_&h*2(;+}n{4;Q3qKdsn7&xxkRVI$~dF~j9wR!)J5S|uvS-d1B zhUojQZQOtUa7T?2V}nvK-cuSTWG7-_WYwEAkdZ~%zOyiuO{5*k`@9pAjT3BARX9dQ zx*o~^&ze@U9J55{oJdt@0N7iV2WQW(2HXDJVgbCqC6-JomIq8(OhcqEH-uK|UHQlg zN;A|ed9M14iiN;R)Yum7WuyXps#z%En2*`^FLy{u7_L${FaIUu&rzgBn8-eO0jl)+M4SF1T4F#{vlySHOk&%rgE4&)t?MGyr;TMWr zo}L7MK=eiS;+qVe&_Ea7HVFf<NY6wfNxyX1&iwcCNMLypBLt8JEoaw(Z23`RQ_VA!=|tuelz^F$gD35JIrvtqqx!))P1I=4JvU zr`y-pTTWef@S2$&I~gS}>Hn*r%m+RYpaP?XObN6FS%SnzVXU_vl`RCon{NPrW4 z1l!{!Z(@nEsQ3R_P4uf;=&l#XRKrxK47n6}1ISaqekXA!0(ese%DLrrC!*>T$r__#;`Q9q*#bD9c&m3dxs} z{>fyC8elW}gO{qk7lGh^n=3V(hBD9>_AUSYAnD~P*gdxhh>y5Yc{qUr>f^2y=cOV8 z;_Xn<{>5rt{rarnM{iXs+zeWg@q=M8dcnu=fDQ7CoeuyU>{F}$RO?Ik=Zlem5BRv; zrN!0+0r<}OHG>jq6@XTwNPVI2sFBl;{ATYELIL9+!t_VB^ZNc!?4EU5*yr<=axg@M z(MD|`fX96WKsxIh$QWnoLAk~r2vbyCUFzt3$Kuu7Ptj4hm6E|lI2_HhktauOZ}X48 z7@^+FO5=2F-0{~Q2B`KMF2XF`1-gwZ)C{$C&GRyV8HCqj}LH+2N>=J zV|M;lK5Ts_`~_mpX^|U7KBCBS#$YB`&sX4Q#|A{~U)`(bpk{i_bw#PL9 z@zdlX5HKsIBntXPv(bw1ZeKIK2?vWV(UBu*Tur%cXP=DdCn`U4a!X4L=V%fuH|53| zwSoUr2a!sg=Kuv#{i0m8L6}x6m(}3E6uorNU8Y{5Zv$#A6UD&*xMt?ao_c1SrMB2e zH{VI=I$F*N;(dF}NzrlZ4E_;dus(Mwj619eZ1)GFXL ze(xqAybiQ)pQ4Umm5Fd%Nc^nSZ8#7V5^Sw}3bWWB-@d&!wY*&B73A^huiJP$Qx7sc z9l~c-00ezr7aO-DY~H^B4(A#>`rSnp-a)-y!fvR3hF#Kt-Ff`0(7V{vlrQMs?-9=~ z+f9t*qb|=#kA=E7G`}T;JB}=8nUAma#=0%-+nGj-*&h3|RA@V-gj$#%VRUz}&gE5Uy?BpBM5 z8(~#f*2jaKAB`$%mN zkF@=0^2MX$&Uo>VA;y{y2j&}-Ixwj*BR)Z{V6{ElcN0A5v55=&&Kwz! z@hFrX2^(2NrOJEi5Hl=(30DleUWc>2KcK(e2iC-=xeK`LLoxcyAvZ%bWdi0zb-1b{ zI{?cb%dmdwd4rZ-OP6;B`-<3(!hetkx@-p@t9~LUxZLq0#3S3lYS}5QQEw43oN@lz z)x?B0`zAd)$JYUG^VPV?k6nvnaj+IsX@$=i4@P03OLcEgyd$KfcnM8&4pbrL-^m2K z$Epnm+J)Y!5IJ3-N*C}f+dIdskurQ(4*&I#J!#u6172%1mehQlU@R1 zU(#PbqOi1A%h+C3ho8km7_{Ik;wucOcBH6*MY$xa$VN{gZrOf}n zhpLn@*iNpza}nW40-JDH zO`W|yc%+=H_;lH;JFNT)3d$R$Q~_7fWr1WXRO2N;T}FYR?uflg1&XlS9q>ltl;p(* z!7@HbE7kyUT|^~qRliJk;xJ+gn9N2lSSFB&8tx&IVMae%enHs?7B(4O(<7g*(r%_{1%-%SKhn}r#9@Wo>Rfw#ps>Z~3lWA_@v|0*irs(C}gr#p{byGJs zT74P5y;-Hvx{WjAT|2*zcB86HB8(j+AZ?T{A6wk~{{F`Co&*5wabW8fl?t7nz04Bi zUhW7W^U4z;f(#4|7^E!B=Gx1fb9^{jYZtWndgCB#OhKBOS88}eDcx(1fa^SqfDN}v zoV5#R{W|VA>)!VjBg|JrnR;tUBhF<|AeTENPT4@{@8xqVjyfdiIZlGu zab@TP_FIWA&j6jLo?)}}9g4>_{#Xa2ifd>g)o%&ybAdc(s}zKlTBEhti&dshxKd#k zHw-Q#UC$#~f99ni)XNQ;2dU7mawR887F?+nOBApa*-$DLPGgyvp+JzRvzra!(9ZwZ zE4It{4@kZi;=aUV+V4}_95TFfaX z=GNj6)f)wII6#s%mL@=?=`bdeTSjzw=XZmR?Jpp!7qnC(aj2HHhQ=D|qr2;n=@|cF zsp834x+BjrVb*3;$sqSTU?1)l#>-^a!C&( zOzI+a-~_b0f&ZBVZ6@6OCulXkl2NyJ*5HFU9|qTGn|qL8CfC1{54kEeC6N2+wO%E}F`ptSdyzzi{|n-SSe@3nDDaa zGag_1+^^-eRoa^b2^~HPfxR4JvJhlh!%J#T;F z_BV5#}%#@B(Hr<*ErS|Svq*(vB;l50v)Uxyn597k0WGtY4f)3Xn3#8%!FEUc z+Vu~HSn#=RTwHq&^@A^qHqL34c*VHwJO#w)hYeUB<;Mn++NQ-C8)o#4Kl}$jK)}BS zqI?qPO()EevsxvjQ%^tdIG<;Q8J=pT7D#|0-UJ(bEMUHHX*O8sW9|$n5KWU#K-Q{% z-DUs>bhFSCTT@}M9r)pSbI^g*D5lYosQOhl%(bO=p9S9@my+E(U~2mG)XKn&*Mj(G zbYuO0V6^2cX_Y&_08$E{xAUj*t4!?p=s9UuCZfkjf4gD-ZU8koAur^CM3zhbr!&5D zEx;AYIxw;Et^_{yXsB*NMfYVqz*E`z4r!;4Kuoop?|=nO#_TCWA`XlFFLX=+VsGk^ zraBWg42tudAsG&nz!8EHmRxNruE?VBiv$dRq$M-fV!7F)4~ie1zTzVMUanP*mHD$A zmDWQN42|9A>VJgnjslZ)rqGKmd4G6tdiel!b74%HVD7l9r zuE7>xlig40I;s3jQZ=bxOSpOoI9rWLR7qes;^pYHhZj9*ohOIzfS&-4Mz=%A*6M60 zZll!05X0%h#D^VzmUQ-msdyBA^4s(b@)S_QPq3zy&X-d(W}9KUFS1D z#w6$(-Wc1X;B^qdwU&~4b~{s=QsMHg+{sCX>)5RH>>EsIUyanY!GeHT4jSUU$bOJXKFDK?}I$&3;NPu)e!}%RzS81?NX(bLv z;$oF75nEBKcU|FDcHD_KlOJY(l{sH4RFh{6EjhCeV>*1ISS2B^oJe}aQrm=GMZ=<~ zkvM}#a7=|={P3de@y3slnt#12FR^K{--pqqPDQa7u^hSEoA3PMZOKU%tp7gdylnMg zy(ao|8LrP$jM)ZunD1e56iv1pz#xL(cTS!<{?C8SE|3 zHBHwWXD4(|X33jTga#;o@tThhB5k8&{)=!gMuDA{CJE4l^lO|8ui}u^7HTgTA0Qf< zD&vtvL~XWhdTtlP=n76lWSb{uh0&cB%Ob?O5pz8h0;~6RBz)*qH*h9GzCH!781Bp(*)3OR zB^l_h3}5bSi{UPvakXp{YI=qUa{t3bE-f}FA!0kCPk|-q9-{g-mGexHrS45nVem!( z7jP{35&~2^>W@f$NN-PStB{d$ykKdQ@1K+vyf1r{L0B1okpXPm3LK5qL-Q+ZKPh}mZ8!+tJ|}&7O~~BEu<LM-K)AM7P#LoIYST%8(e5bH!*;Yu-5?DH7dUQ{u7OOzRnLBqv%75MW8|ctF}vin zK#TjMXs8f>u}Ric=ZOL-uW2BB2Zsm_eKdZ;{bR#Dhx}IUPLPTVE5^+v*f_2|xFuoWc(pylLm19KC(^&h>sjwe={ls>FC9cBd17*Db}sXNvK- z=#mpQk}b9!HPsUsW9(Fm)*y69X7*IcJTFOtD2zC$GWOLUOP@^HYZnZI+K#w!xJ%W# z$!#O4rO}yFKB>2S?L-pJoh5hLyhAF8HLPDre=!b!s1+#12Ki(Dz)G2B5{fb+%7@fc>Rt2<2;eRPhETzT=N z;NRj@v?nzTRd_tvN!*lEd#tU9-UQ5U%hXV%;sUAx(G%jmD(SDX`Ze$Q7Yy_96) z$3ieXx1L(X0))U)NlM#TQ9iW^u`HCNAqiAx3*0{F|8*3j!qCcOp>b2aD00o*I!Eb>uA^lznT&DJaVO1A$ z#pddpF;NyuUc@nRbyBfwgMn+?j#4D^t8|WZbGWFldqRKX{GE22bE)6 zJ7a%7!>C5xr4}VQuZ|r8$s!}t5A$CCoesjyWkpr`2Xs;Q6L?5JO`H6Y7B=Sk1Hhe#h zYr+O5Rkv74yFx`cj+94_T5(K`%RZfFRnKrd@pDrr_^CCFgbv%;c8TLqP=&63p9>d6 zo&mc6)u}v2Ppv39R>W6b-#Gw`UtnX&%T4*&j@c-^Y@MfG&bv*Oky2fMdtu;#wze*Q zM2Pn6X(Y_2@OM4QZ&C4pIf2^DK&)2AfNI!9U$$^nwckLo%{3PGOsW$T@=3LBZQmfF zGOdrHP;4J(a6%sB*8;3O4(+y-B;`1-v>jGusQuehT+Hg~RKK5hi8>{-zDSB$+$d#Z ztxNW+i8c!*XQn#U)S>x*HY9oI@bDHXbsKqGOdCY_@t0}Pc^%x_1LPL^W$1s|>euR!MH zm40~dEr?>N-0pOzH3vv#=XZ0IN~ zL_HOYZ89zpI@rShu=}R$pa>3}tI{bNbgeu^w$j3fqq`ak=B~~XNg?y=?w^EtAAaOY zV580l(Q2ag7gi#YEvQpN?-0vNXwX~-jy278+gGLtS5f7EEJ;p0FLM~#cHkw$SYv8k z^C>f}H^PR7oyauEV2>z11<@Yr%kVBpdqix&U_u5NlFO7uqb%Z8E=}Ok(&%i%>bx#3 z{o;kV`d5Kj9i+9auky@|X_|ktWLhP@;5HQ9C;4xja3*rh+7ZEZDZyJg4-2@QNMRYC zOA;Xeq4g4fI~>|evRR1Mqt@05D_eEl8twaqOk=ELmnY;3^<_^K-C=_^4QRaOr=$_I@R+%9H+i+T#+#)U)=WtX(#BpP7|j+?Am z1EedRCRA$OBjeOIQfg=Vl9lfaQH==MMBVNR<=m%AOsPzvU^857j_>nz)ojaN0S!A2 z72_wGS7{bExc^Ks(WboT1WaO(#isXs03Ekta>~e!DSQ|9mmczyKSZn$>(7y=>y~(gt`hC*<@GxnvN3UK_TuMPfEFtGP?|y zkTny-k+|=Mh4W7}unBd!`T!%gr^Dg^%?El(+uiC>TZ!oC^ZTn0yRTOt*1La(s3tMf4noDlyWhn0gNaX9`~kD;=Cu>xv;{&CkW!_0^J#4prpGPO*cMrq9rj`o*k zchXp*j0+UVhqKSa7Z;)1u*p>wvXc#!GI+~c0QpITk>*1+*s1C7&L)T*I5r^G2voIO z{wF>Wrs(WLEPqmr0-0=F-59~TN?T)rN7iP8r6h&s+tvS#XR$%F{HpTaPJyftc5-4rncC7(H zrnjf9^l*H2Vti9QGcHL-BnO4d@fO>@qo#+Ri-~hZ)_O^ek*5?EmOr5+xctGC-G$Uscf&ASJ2t zRPh{@jPn@XqY&o1-oT|^A{mo^*WV0x>9Xu8f3Elel$>jL2*>mX=aEaCh)&i8uprc%bt$?|)#s z*7A;Z+x4;-@HT>D^NgRbRT?MiN|c-e(52!;Pxmpx=1u$M*k|q0gAnt7_0taJbjfj= ze-uNFp~acFf#8?tp_ME>PLJ;Ea|YfG^OGzCVoNAF5# z3uj78F)YUmq}wFY0YiG~vq%;VeNkFT!%}M5xw-#j!pKB9cPF@Vwd^ z!AeA8`)%?oOq`#{KFx16XDfLxi40*Ba6U>7TUnYXsXAYgd56#5BV4?TzB@S6In{qi z;V;fWO(YMrGp#f66mQUk6aM%Zg+7N!<%yvrrj@m{pD#i=XJcr8%pkN!l&W$l?Z9PN z2wqHdt@*=L>|qww<5e`$3!0;reS=lRV<)N$(p@WxEM!=0Mb=1))K_4vc*Z37#WAKy zWiu+n{5yOGE2(ot8k?~y?)`V|Ko!{MlwdwZhSds;aJjVpV6fw$IQe5hANHizCdcaV z0!!B!OvOkJ2v`k&HC0tn-2JjPhD@EJW?zC6N-^Lr9wTk@ORAQ(b3iuXmftqYzm}*p z7^lFbYv#0IHTYBjW4PU21dCV=do7IdBZ$xnzw>ApXy;XNU`R8Lhe1WEzEb4uI3hRA zO&y32_uQkgne)36WUM?L)+Xh$T_SBt`U(CjH5>FkUwMRor&WI293__2$k<_n?2+nB zAv)mK5RCxv7y&)fN$n79&p20cn~$gjgynWo_j2zw9Rs32?6!Jv%c%4S&5n&%9Jjw4 zT2f`ANL)Clw2_Dz7C~z*eRN2JGtaND1k9Kt6fBe+WoSsKu)J`h4IWF;%f=Uw-~|DA zX_a4;>!($JuhzoVGfepKo;mPqV}?_h#hiBnagnMCw2q8%Xf<6dZ>qCwkK9+Y6@vLY z;{+q1P~c>p3g*b)OSasjD$>}BOi!c+&QZ|mWjiL2LAzYibABd8qfwR!qds#Ih6*Rq)WP(A#lR@y> z)pl~Eb$1^AV_jO#6b=Wq&|<+k$fOgAkMpi8NAkD1WkR@nDxMo6X(+dM3`attJVyMd z^=rXiJcmbythEjIh<^2-ad0%W9l%KzXOZ*YuLOAh1h1uI41V9`+QQ`i_EZ_TC z!X#Ay2NI$t#*N~AJqfy1-tsiWM8ef2dta#rn@(v5x=&di^Xy;}6Mn9s7v)k@LT*MO zQ<$Lqy}N1@^3L{=2J4_h{LM%`{e>abWSMk-9TIG!{rVJ=8QTjs!HjC;U|mbB(;UEF z7vAfG&DUHCZTI!2qVfT>wOx=Yr3tgtBfL$TO74?au0H?IF~Mz5kMN2tq9w5VA|Byb6q60cp~sL& zjKA*GG+I6d)ZAq>P5~?{vMli zXY1}9GAcU);?o>~WhXnCoXyG~`tLKuibABrPJQOm;|I|g=hajvmGiO{rd7m$?Flfx zwYQ^CK)S4xV|K~*kBivs+g_9NGml{>9yNgjlMOj6ZxigFkLL# zYW2Kbei@$2r8%V_KtccPNS2yr?V`#337n8x)(!V3~l&_>S~R*#Y|X=mB! zK`|l>MKXm){|?Ssdlp~zmxrou^}CNfFTC~;MH*Jm4CU~#zbWl&=}F0dd`8AGg?K-P z+c~OQI^M|gC^fSnS5Hus#B)j1OQb_o!3FuFHoz)YG)Qglo77E~w1paa>_!p*v4%ng zJ)X(+v*TC+FgVIC*^l@~Z+03!F*2owtoyNr!bZUdf7fYXj^dGn?_#3=T{IBrDE6n8 zTfQH(B5>1+n83@i0+L%)t*)^uo~hkr3=6wgnOw29^ITQII@g(@m$$!@0qU&( zn1K9*+Yc<{pyNqQ)vCNlo4&ckutdK*`()){;XNB`LfTA~DP*6eQ2t}>l%0CrL~;rX z5i(Nj6d+sJZ)9Z{vI2Q*(%qE(l^)iDTF@v(6Davo)c2F#S*&`0aGiT0DH3Dj3cm^0 z*N5#(Rx!?SO{&7C{VT5UO5lp+G#F;>$R*ly9jmt%{ znWJGDQNH1xD46+wbbGuz=PA+)yF9@cd}TJ%v{j^SBH6u2&2U77ieoKWAIf9w))&x< zq9_?N)ZfIiLp%R$Yxh;S$IQ^Gb&X&Dvcaj$hFjP6HgU6f<4qmdAP7+tZ2<8Ytt*>D=`ge;_{^5=DP+1S%>`g4yq*<*i`{y~f9VEP_D=kI><#!te3h5Of! z`1gzU_<7eo4MqFYPx0dLNA)JW`!De4ZP?C#_meNb{B5<>@BihOUw+oD-}%`)Z@=;7 zTYvk`JMX-I{qvvx?ceHfPv7SQei40_zj<+f`)OD`?N0yRMuf9m_w9Q>+TE(5ciIlTwk-5UiCQi1;6`7!HBikVWKg-@_-eNq%XdB zgfMsY&6+%>Qv3naq#@Ohu>PSp*mEgIzxes~rHVy=G||&x2m4k-q;m>a)M#AiWjO9) zv%>Oifkt~SF6L)8Kzb&Bo$5-bgl21jt480^K;_=*vl7^w)G8iwAbQleTyK@AKMQpO zev-8w-s!@Z=>Y*t3sy=!0huXkvnD{#yO zJzPJ!QZ-$(W1^&vVB^Y-bzKvHlH)$DP*#3jW%4Ei4hn6M#OG3eR1_Smib&6+yjr9E zPB}Q4$_rvOsu~E_|5icJw2cxGo`eZfqHDvZS{3WBa9KMM+8Vf!6#XHkpTK+85h|sB z8P8&eQI-=gCb^)+^x4&aKiimB?5u|@GTUE8*VrS{uNj*fjnXW%qiNNjGwbu*@>Viq zL*%eqT9Q8gQZ4x(diirmMt#pt(nWxn?o9%ym#T zo5e0gQccLO-!@dNg8V9ElMds}%VWNOfPUI&f-gwA1VI`3GSTmc1JYev3l&({*YZ!! zhfI?^(R_+h=|=l?!!n0O7Y=ZC0?%+DvbthIIP=){6fxJhmywoRc4KNnwOX?Rvnpi4 zTp}0UkGcvAZSbyDCp5*Er^Wtg6ip&WdsEm|LZ6PwfS1M$xi1#2&lIb^%vD-{@P|d& zkemK-@2Pa7v?Qjr;@M4b8Iu>2g4m-^du0QEvwB1 zx(y^&Gef^zD9v0}nUJ<&qWd=!jkUq-LK{jP;bJ=?Wj6`RvffVp+Q8X=Cc#d&o&b&w z?@Zl`zR|f3+rJB5Q01=oO=UBGEl-!Yj5Ze02>F^WK`g;%CPk5gwu~NB0%nTesa1zG z5=O87WU7`(_chZ`Ftk!H`*UJ*W`vAgoi)7{i&4}(iqcAQ80B5Cjgn1N4=FrJ9G{3V zi3YKuji>(Hx`EboupW+oia1ND53uqwH|?0es$KOE93t435S(IZm9ryoQ6iRq!!_vb zDRQc=$wep02t)umq#fiHH-;1UJQgmPgrQEeI+ZRYeWMXau=8f>DX z?($f>ggnt$+6cBsNaAYBC@Y!(Hf7v`@3hz+ZmZ}sL>hIeVkh-~3%nPXIf-2uZ?TIZ zQUOrj@##UDStd4rd}YfUM|g?wd&nD(${7nqsc4CFY-tbyKEvuC9zQD7sJ^d%mq;T< z4UTyc6E@9WP$x_wHZaZ6X(9x6P3mX$Fb7@|E(2>Hiee`?-vtBY#q&eepYcm9QjH|y zuL=*I`m>`bo$9-Pnhnd6{T5|(3R$5fw`Q5m41!sIfJ3Tu@Ri;VK+%G~U%RHIImVh3 zY9_H#sfyFmW1D-c2SB1q*Rck*aV*mP?e?SwGNan7wn`SQ zLZsT%t!lK0Ip273_01rT89ArVNYKKfRXefeZd0N&heD!%dY04c+!AM*J-tS!T-9yB zI97|+#V!Y#KsxDKB*ydbe17P3c{nV@bnvCNlnhVAF{e=#SXNaCH1(o;dM4K;I#Xqo znG%!=C{k$)OdeIGP;LoY968p-(!olH#P=4t@``}ohLo_Z$Ef_j5s)u%HbYM3%W%o& zY#4q`MxHZ&V?<%FB)ML($_T6=wB%y)?yPMJMWH5qNnPffXc1tscAe5OSK7VkT%l+9GOW%C?_OvfWxF$sX(K}|QRpEh zSlwKP)%{y@I*H|S*Kc%_Ew+ZDgx#Vb1_7}ffakI5uPLcq8a5%@p5_vYQzySHYID9df>6_RQpdS4u!`Q_G$ z4X1%LO_bO2;ygj0&0$N`3@CxX6C0`~EVs~FN+h0V)~T87Skl8e<)a!xN!L_GZns*gh9$K_;HuO; zGYZV2{k$5d-*!@0BWTZt*G}=j4$u)OmkRUQ-uUU=+fyz=hG`Aks6A%fdrK)J5m%&~ zpsuUD+I0i6)>^C(&ej*@p+-)Ln~%9Oqmz4oTfr5Cc?>j0fPoo~B2-2A(!f@QO7(i8 zyU7iOI3jVEsvLSO-W4K54z&-H17`IKCJ2Ail10h7ZbS4vVteNP>EYLtq+6idpyRR9 zh2rYA?NmIHJz0aXT7IBq@+`Sjt6t&&44c1EN}TF*Y&3R`XO{Dx`q#&q&+KH`o*;8VGf<7aP& zf4%e0^&IMV^n?Gh&1OsMFIh~?ZGXUjxs!ZW_^$H5N9^qfFI76+&@T%MJ7b%sf=@G4 zHVO$q&9#2jD`Hh`7cb!cHRlJ-yfw%IOB5=s&6r$N z>L)O6a8R@d6nmdl#fVNmqR2f#J-My>&p%q zi+TuY#ZSXR4^jK=dvAwoE+0hMkAedHM)1FrF~XCM7Zv*A5wIb>86Jd9DvYV6ffSl@ zo#{xQI0dEnr_tc#YYY^+u}hjD;}J_3@-Wnj%GabuYQVQiiraZ+1`%OTzs zvwK@Uc}fl4gk{X%dncnH#-+%S8a40Y>HItYn6Xy=Sk>4uzMHP{kl zh-X#!;Bns62W)(QK{k?T)KF(v*`g6{m`eQ*BG-&O^a)^{2Lq znhL$#Z%sVqMdDJosiMXiU+I%m`=E^bc&#bDL*GvqVU?(nYqCGLC|m5#o0cTKq#$!$ z)9Yy&duhGh=(2RQJ(_kqu>=k)5qAbE=A!8%LjWxj(QvMR$aKIaUhG(p;6j7g;?779Meu8W9J(RSte9ty7O`zS2~I zhO2MC68ckAX;#qUqS!d;(uAvTohK92bgOShTkQ_nVe0dhg_3)B%u4DV zk5nBSm$J`)a-`6V#41&MwB}N%$Lq;nY2+z z#6t|^w!YcCus|C-hx*5jT(@s$Veo4rq0 zzh8xjGWD64*U6MmBxd&|TUV@Yqi*1V?W}ffeF8JNZmYyLd(}>jb{4G7uGwrmkb9QJ{Ual2-OZ0zV)D2rgWYWyR)#oSn#LULV zqG<(Mwk*J8U{q*?sG^<9p$ZusRo)pL#i!nX2R=QukX`H8f406Zajv$V?_a}KsSJ%X z6RvK%?JEX}#?Bxf$TV_xSAFlUj%1OfK$! zb_@1J8@Ub?G>2no-(A*f9;65`bqk#ObJ1i>z3|L2n?`?1Sy68sp+ZYjssCz{jM9|) z_Oq(7oK{~v`ho%Ai!WSwzR+<&1{OHc;7hh1_wkYi@Z7lAMJ{LS`N7(-ZiiS5+(=ZS6^ ze|sY1<6b;#nq>Bs(q6cNPwNISk5PlV<%B==(}?V z@5OE{@gK1jl+GFrSG-`~Spun9l3$elffcE?FugXLr@OJ+syHO6ZA)|MGx|e_8$0+7 zi`rXQCW3{)bYVU1`B5A~s;nd~$j3F|5P->c1M-chFH48~;bHr;i)!_Md03WxNRd__ zSL4@R|8$X?0&}9D-7Q$&SPXDEa%mIH=}NOvRpNkiUos1f+DdK8JL-}JbICM?kEr#r zVQ;R!4eMZ&_^r#lDS; z(M7f@p&H>A{`>z7)%ti5QYBawW%Jp8|KF=SzXD$e3w^!%hY}mHpyT@8lsl5tGI&>M zxU^E;GmOHsl-{G^8PFK9p>SYmU!1_lZe0@~Ijk-w>~GOiAGAq-kd1T;H<49U`{U}e+?01;La^lrPk2ezuMg_#a0-{1^a+o%=Y>vWTC!a02G1LLxcaxzeF0`j zsYN$j`yYQm(dJlx0uIrm@5Z)n!fCOSj?_hs_BYyfLwv=7^nhWp>l=ZG&>R?YBR8>D z9=r8Z*&whH{8n<q+N5*v6l;^Ew0P~d ze#Qw|Y+x=pZpqB?4laOUVh-s{YC>y*vs5VWv|kt zd)ZkVnRkVM<1n0^k3RV9SHsp9~*{~ zmVz9L4px1qa4^W|?}F`R9ZoK`YCbxRdvMiYM6&QBw%cBYer8dUASe~=02Haq-5ft1 zzULu-nKc*kKzQ37?xa89HO(zLA5-(1YPAm8YX72xalx1n4Q2c;ckA`k7|99ZB7(_= zPU=jOAo-&W7r>g}s+@wOW0h_STRWa~$@Ii$H5+l+$mb{2+Qyr6KNqu;O?Vs_>gn8g zDd9FGJPOk|HrmO8#*DEo5T=&G8C7Jr(x_2?%Dn^@mu$GfASTC?676@1<{kej?P(G5 zmN+QZj|0gZHi1IC@oIqZAnAas0M#7I=}C7n6PU0HO7Jr#B(rfDcojD)^x5b_pn+ek zEXI}VWL?%2bBSBsix&wU*6!lNH0by~9``>+GWHA?k)*+Tr>BJUqpB zKK9(sc@6@EpM-)&{zeg(M3FPq@2zIIuQDS742lS)08*u?+v>cQPQ?lIP~o&`jJ-r> zL;*6nj!NE9E_kYMZS>15ONQ&BoLP>4x-qg8rqHJ|5#{9E%|T}f*Y^!Th%L4;iMWUx ztDcENW!eJNZQ4OSQcz0LXCEDIkp$M1lF{h17LjvxZMtGuHn3oo5WXSq3IjzJ5tceT zud5c0Gn)mk3f2`Hi7A9?$*XdUrUVbG#5Q!3$1_JU^RQLa+rDgtcD9A!ROu*xyhUky zy9NU*e#!9dcMubz|HI$`G3E_DtBCKC{YPMg2{9ETmeTjXp5iO5F_b;a8Xf0V8m(D% z7&y)no<(xZXl;9q2-^LSElFl5sa7Zt!~Yc#O~-Q=J`Rv*szzEKC|V!Ph;RC%P`{{}*jCpizJeFPk;gS&@_&1~udbz;*9R z?G^32=T%$GN))qX8CDN}{du?@Ga^Zz2c!r8yHWm39W0jT4F5SZEKdgflG~StrwIkc z8jw8BEH|_Mr>HyB!x68g@UO8?6?4kfx!B~1;-@ewoHi!>ClKn)scM4c ziNm~HZtB>wOxYNkqlGko0tvTJF)}rOEx;&c`+X#re)#%80V|+XRF`MEs}Q!Om<$Ei zjA80k>P`3F-%E}4q)T+rlf}zjHn=z1TvFkL4oll!Ai*ko0V~C@2f~YPQDDv`r`F+E zFG0r9B#K)?m@Jj^vMO7ii>@C?b1cZu6+*@GKQU?6Eb=qGnJ7JflAcbF73`cU88cj# zJN8Ttm7tHqeqEP`91dtu(S&*gHDbhK&iSSlz)~R?!$YQINLnsaVFxf#vL!*#(Zx35Ldc>9IXC`XfD;{N?TGPb(BHlU~S+y zqBf8k^8j^0|P!9hQu2mJ{+xUEu{RS}c&+it;_bDqm zFHv5t%a=E%z5yS5g~BhV+wX*7O<)qU+f6btOQh(W5@-E?fI@X9wQH;Y8P#wE+7b4) z^_e5p#zwcmR)_4>did;YvB@>06tT*gc0L0iOwp<P~U-Ygq`CIS-gp2Xm%y zpx1e8e7MDb4h{*!gDF1dN`MNcmev%Yi!wZ#So7P}u?4ooJ}S~wl$*qklMrSEB#9#^ zoO^3wj}Gx<(8ie#Ms|FXNwLjW}_03X_4m0 zR&)|J!bO*8Jik;Q?gly!6{?eklAF9*`t+h3 z!nH3~|2&;{+wH2fW>wOwa%{wsNB9)JZ{0Mdv}X?@iL+m>TfcB>_aG$P-FEe9`m-M{ z`?HbOy>r(f|LDr4>diREs7*9T*@Ut{G|3a#QM^&ov9i0E&KA-hDPNO|G+&EjNPx(8 zXhQ~nB+{{OPqOkbLc|+wcI}WYx^(b3ipPtyNQw-2O8p-p7uUlm(hE|&Im$rGtipwJ zC_R{|W;L$x;ntaB)w~`w;@}h8R1g&Pg<1zJs>xjt*>};^&rbAB1?aaED9a2#QK;L+ zx*j7G#hic$uFyVb$Xceo-g@Fc5}(dEER6Vnj*vN;A!TZ)KpSX5(z@0QEhnpI0u7R0 z82-I?C+X~apn+&)>?rls3ye0FcTNQ2+v8*VMUMk&l$GqwFQjvjrp0Bflw_q!xBE%B zNUHF4i-OO`Nl>RDoFenn%(R_jZvKqu*Dk{NO4)u=@(Y^W zN7b8ckRoQ2_=mB*&0BTYp2R+LJm-gO7#S12DLZPRFGM10Gh{k)>XauDb$(t(aNu7D zJhimxwe7lGQSSwqb{rn%BsfYI>pT>Hkh=}$VsrKFI8idJ7cvL_nS++VMDB?xHwbIO z6}~?8D{_@7s?~=tlAwDM%(e6Cht@Q-62JAL9%o}j0Cu5%`<_;>-aj0v|KrVVS$lp zW16zwqnlFvY;;G#&89Y(w>0yqhqITD`m7Ye=+2U!o;;q*Pf72#9l{T*r~M#pK5+#K zi|_WF`6ft2ra-jvZq(0g+4C$b?Gru9Mb3I5>P0PhOXmOw-B!bx0O^58hJAYlDH%e8vF`w2q30nc1lI|I|+7J-TC;_2gT~w4?q0JyQ*DPQW3cR+=JLCGSN_bT7}gbs=HT{J zgG6dC3&T%Tv6{-29_9l3FltgrxR z{FiQF&D`ygu}J;AQEJ4PSkM)@Y{lRYU7Z#ag|!Ic2?!`Ay+?;?BIO}8S9cw?gB*s&4^os z5Dp|tfRo%R3BdQO>6utaUxSQaRP8*^Yhqhxp%4g-pUe&oRTj&Kc?0sLSOPbJS2Cy9 zgxOuMyR)lr!*|*#L0ecAZMR?M$hf!qM-y|G;EmHB_?U8km{7=skYKWEQklvLfCL?* zg!fA(-*-ea>8@mdvFB6!RBt_gG;7@V zEQUHlSvh8Z;Bi@z3v?vj7A}09DZ;46W3F(#y0bQ&OnJfT{fT68bzkvn`t0+z9@K2* zSG^Fv?G#rr0f{+xW$SmNl`7${C#WZfGaK!h@D@oA26}bf&Yg3mp#a9W@RugxD9J!x ztL*0X9Qmmz-t}T@jWKK}3WoAhuuD$~ zy~#lo!njmJAbS!5o1EUFXdwE+QC#9+PVxL{+Xe(W5uH%MQM`r{vUREf?&2?aQvmDh zyM6~Sl|#hTsKP?}GQ+kCV*qJK zfrvMMC(Iw%@DOc;vQI3bO!dz}JId*g>WlBHJ;ui7oFSbVCy=wAA&CjWOCCTT6dow> z@+~q`>EVDy&<)EbrGx%p1o;sB>qTyX3QcUwt3P&&8eWlUw2(ISqI9y5rL*`Bf%UKM zx3yh+hO%5{h&Meqyfr8O2O-j^**c-wgHbbomhNatD@N30mhNyebeKN=Of?^^$nYPr zSE;37vHEZ-zpm=S3PS4!Df(C@*3yyJj#S75Lh|ge#d3IBm-v4nPOk1Oj@VN){qyhx zrttzfM)>D%>)pk;P)p^lH{SU9UA2`Dhu(s}J>+DTn_5*n0WB*#2`{ca4>SLhSbVy5U8CKD`ZsSDZCU=qL|zhlD@F$Bde&9 zUsYNv!Z^|D0-LdVcbbk&c4GO&60v^^Egaw(2tW_8VhQmNqZ2ag{O{-jlg1T?u)+0!3VZE(?@({x3k!0hKId}U=3(C3;Q4;wQeAK9$0O5`^!8L&> zT&?RRWBi(1KF{hz3PWmR@1B86I7C@K5V{geII~ek>!VdUf+zx%*2|j;&5VV5)#z^c z(Yg_^SgLWKHc9LDlF_UZ1&p+dlAA)~m@~Bl&Pg_X%tY4O21rpC`XDiXOEQKoM6Usm zi=B&Jq@(Zwb6gN2E~^GD-uiczLWF~h{fdw3ru%GzPCL0|Cd+dWs+km@PW`bDd&Kpgm%|#0FdGHMjKHd_`g%8UL})1M z*JIS4o3mH0U@JgSei2%1bm+$ZB1=Do}zr1opV5tI><;Tz}&8W^>EjJn_W7J!z6I?n?^m_ z%hVat7Ibkf&^<%M7xOG6b_D>u+Ury~al7s&^&;3dM8YLG+wo91rAW>!q@v2)WQr_q zmcxWy_lS*DwZw?d4R<3^Bl$ysiGun^- z{8kAI;dNh4fUgtAg>_^Fd^D{V0uAdm({I(EFjTQ_o^>@G^s4|q*FL+b&z%$K=w!v^ zCNDPOF22&_Yx$x2XFLaV1*IP%hS{~v(g?=tku2-q!5yl9Qt^O95OSzoLq7IKZqH%) z5%u*1Iz1Os&t%Ytco-_{M>o&I5dQ7F)iYLg^%H$)ALlN1I1*_hd;Lc?VY-oD)|4!t z{u+N8u{2O^8W#F_$qE2wK$*W4fuhvzLyGCrNj0uklVX$b%uLm2->G9DgNOuN(H@gv z{KP9yB}52zgXU^_e{Q4}G7Br;reO4i+2u>N8%265^J@8P{E?aCCO~lE6bp-bq4|@c z>O!jD0M7g)l8alU$}mMZ3Wgx794MUV(z5%i-<^`FNH$^F6h~TAN#2yHe*l;mmDIdd z?Oduv_G+#;l1x}~>%Js0PTg^s^uSbS7(9PVyv1hDmj0}|e{Gl!m5J{73=%>H;s_g3 z=57=D<%#oRg5!)&=Xl#=#v(Z_BB|6Xz8)ZydQfQ8M)f0e?wR71)!{d4s@$F=?>D0V ziR>;<;j)4amgQEltrCZb@PZ42J8LeSvuYL#X5D#XeLV6c7KGtxo-5ikiBx?e3Gt%3 z=>_F6rFs%Be|=K0zMM4V4IC92tKa;@(HNi@c7>^c00eHjxyY_jxIE8SWmH^|LY<-m z?onU((}E^O78^OKgzTGuSy7gv%VR1 zIBrk0O!~)pJqzr$cFkB9H;Kccbd*D&{AO6T2RvUkv#y-f?k1wI@raAC(VZ4mTw03y zlGMroe>aIvXUYV(2)qy@ebxig*ctXs*h#$%KeMm5*k$jlvF>9lY{@SkkIhW|c^hInjlTB5cyNP=3S#l@M(Ul>r*lxZ(0sH}0A16@F)xViC z(ohMm;q7}ryZ7e36;tAHfVPUy>MK>|IdqYKBFYqaT)aYDT!Hf4yRe9-Wuv_$Es|I$ zf3TW`ALe2|0K0SL9gvw@CruZtnZu$72F$S^J;@ z9XarwZq5pmAuKTFgElr9Vw&nk;K#~(Gg(J*V4PP0mIIm~6eacFf%&!^LDqoGswGnCV|udWp*3Q;j@emqJC+og)60cwnktP zi#T0bVsY{$MEybPz&(K^e`Ah$xbw8X`X6HlT0z=0N;==iE_=y(jVVpxs|*Kv(}?T# zJe1|?O!{UK$fBL~u~&?79yeEF5i;GLLgQg|lr`$cSn2lE=?T#|co{h}RF!!i4sU@0 zp{V0l9;=~nj|lF5OzBqOk0GS?6m+}jHqKJIALR;*m&!PQFb?03e?B%CLx7?ieEAAY zP_Ju)Xp8Rb>c5|Dw4D{cm2^|tJaDyK!q@k;46)Gd-8jl!?B0P%mw)YXH|6LOFJ$oH zB7kZ`E)g(C=AE2^;KQ!ra)z?XyDQL&YBWTbyf36nMdqRH-kSzJzbC=R?OrPi71=VN zrr!u&k+>yw;$6=Ge=7QD(x2E(^@fL?pd=6i<$H@WUti(Au6>oExiL{|6&KgJ#fx2A zm$J}>ANG6&2IY-kTFDJmOB>#z-L!5@F0MPr4lr^bNiSHc;l|e(CP>1Bi$}F7sq8t+ zxRgk1ZGzJ}_o*67^rz?(V{F_vIT@>7#rf?WHZOBGZbUM;f0=Ly^=x6s964l0$=Pbtn%**WDs*QD z(9O5|bw*sQf1XSO6F`BgZ)=`2UwnbG=IWbuBk4rENOm3h9jR+EvdxdS=BZ1RQv>}n z-ARO(64nxN(jskl*QPu9<;1rpH9EPl=7xGt8oQvS%N#W%Blv!iV;HGmz`mCoie5IA zj~uj1FYIRg)g`8EE*6%`t}-uJ_yGEjPR>oF0&O>{e`RG@5EPQ=BNIAQaK`U8J}26h zVcoKckfOO(cW&UTUEhb>muu)%hI?1`ZQbscIFRlpR#>WV{ni_Az9A+vq{6Q z-fpL5m^Gf3Seq9?c+sEDUcJz1*bsBO07)QIjZ}+X3#phNvm)kZv;T)1t)6B}Ae(C) zq#vTwe}X#MyJ5dJxu}Uej-s-XxnEi zf6bI87orY_+GS?`8EZ+N{K8GxcO?7{(gLL!Us3sK6K9@J}Z;I;l zp|r7y9MqZ4ziqM^#Sm^hopoBibCe^?e|{7@p8g=5^)%haStsbl)pi*8A8`zzgaF9>PZz=oEJ0oTR4+-Ko%5te_qCj+O1R~6$Mc0t&EO>Fa8 zkMJ1AGsHgSkZ33*aC0O-Yr$%yVi^*1RJF&<9oW&7!+`x#ZhOK|C?%XHLma7WsnQE6k#E2`fesoZwwk07RLnNDe^Z< zZA`MFiog~4!5{J0n?wl$^q~^h(~6pGy1uD$M--Kq6JZQ43Z9pO+cLGEe{{V|4b=*a z3eVso54DE1tfg9zeb!k)m5j6#!h?uHN{=3vs^&xp!wr)GWV88oZTXnRyxv`2oa8H_ za;S2E&`Vm<+yI~~L`9+YE|v>X9Eh20SkS+`_y68o{i@sT1U^0km&oNXYuAnK2cFxT zqp8ScU9JRV7z#TH7^PsSe;RMB2{#AY-)HVK*lO&-O`3H{97HjS9{+HA;A|JwCMNz-lWUFv_lp73+}`wd~~ zHO(vkN~a$Cj(vHDXNeqIcNdHXdXo+%NIfC9pKjg(>)Jk_QIHdR+~J^=N>|8J2|x&NX`s%FC)%@s$7*?9Zut zUbfw)jz+A!a9T-vHgQ=ULEcbxR{cQsTqQ8zy5abdph11?+;lDq4egpEOFDB2IdZ;~ z;JGGk4i!nN{CY##e~}_k=2!l577MQ|v3iy5q4y%}I?tJvTp(}@M_2$TdRd3eJY^@h zYXG<}D(^fd5_pmam{aqQ@kD>`Q6rrNAtAJvo%a%0D+tl|w;)V*&#}^fN%$w4xj((D zB|wO)wC$7EYL{Euy@Y&*tMp%B%Egv=!3+%?3DC)H%RykpPPe!}%)BYSM+GAvO8vQ~;F6p!abZF8|BL$nr2 zWG>U@zBTJoK7_~;39dd@PBEMXYr}je-gr1TDxUdaF0jcvB~aZeP9W|_o%QHv&zF|x zL)V{IBEibOf8Dy$%9~3elkX+rq&qNX>2dQYfo z%Z#c&N++l>;-wwha0Pel`byls?4|~Bo2a6fb~LyF99sJyf0#D*Z9*s<)=Iw0`-8Kc zyNn|o;=RwAQ01Y?b6K_FdJQJDOGoW?RAbdc*>AxalLKK;MW2ZOzdeEcVN6z3M1Wmq zby=s-e}-e5)oEM?V|dt@amGK9D?zmiNU`Y%ts4EkwtczN+yJCQUcLBc3zo$07O?Iv za2B(Pc=hce#32(98cW9v35^u8?1NbdB`1DDxGR*ThV%_eC)SOOCR>|V12qjn;p0wX zK)4eWdXSjVft7VyJWG1c21gh3wea)t-LK;kf2ZrCuQr_+YKkVI;s$XAoOY+rT~1A_ zg60(eND8g$8H6iuV86WlWqb8IOLc^mLv9O8=+HCrnxknFDlg_?Ta^tx;`M57do1%m zwa!Kjp;pY}1pO<+!3%LdRC+z24`W2|Tg9tK@p*`5xm!TwR;y;qf+uZTVnZ!*BsjH> ze}&M&6)vsr5%X*0Hjf_62eln+09U!y2SnW3?$FeUc=M5`z@~~A6`#)zW0Z^oZvNy% zZpp;ET(ggtR)AQ`ZMR=2(Z<*lk)$QDGNDH{wJKzJG*r(+0&mGSei)KjWgSBQDVyM#Jc;XlXvE`1b3T>rU9+Py4h=ECvi2bFCZ5ee|=;` zkx%+rNQp+ovNNPe)j=dxZJ@dAxMp|tZR-b4IDeIG4*Iz2TZWT=KQ%RjlnJ$&K0?Uh zaJd{MwopYXQEZ;1WY#=z<{1^x@SMNI=wg;!%lF5`xokJu_avQ+pyN^|`F%)w8UxAU zs2w!331523Rns{JfauUs3Qo|Me$B;hZ;To~TZc6TP8BZgjib?CrCP*kJOxud zr4F(+)Au14m8k*%iv2h!?^_ZiAKke$vI^NN#8!(3Id|b33=3GeB<*1cga^;-?bM4( z0=4fAx%~RK{zD z!FWvucNJZL9b6W9blXKz^gH7e%9VPM#`@g_(}ARgMw)sk#g_iz;V>wNocPCxcGqU+ zhEm3Jl&TVWb^0vOUcKDxg#gF}^~rxK!+H7c$5r@k;*PO6+vPu3B@QyMU4B!J7pwOx zrwJ``S;O)9e+fSc;YZ{je>AeDeP)pyGqBM zq3AuYdNx$uK2ex09AHM-iOcXeESvM%w9uzTL4S$>84;$wJ*Ot4e_nKqaVV|Bv619C z`y=)ZwAggE*>b0dt&&6^TC%`QpLCHGE54VG7_VZVPpyV%Ql5Ko+T68lo)4L|GLmX% z$%G3Ji9Bh2TvH{u%6!R|B$|#yZE=zEUzdGZ^B>Xq_TAN@kka?~4W%1MTav{r$&0x& zNulTvC^L#`Of%6Ge^Q5QjYXL>QMMs!*yaoy*7i?12_{M75hXL?6}TN=UrT-t6CzA% z2U84k1{!RfnVwdKEfiY?Dki?^J9NJc8@bqRMC)igTi5-X*G}|5C?d)qsY8#<7M2a4 zMYiF6P1PW_9ya2B+7md^n^G|zFQ3WdEERorRZdn!-=2{Df4+jHNK<+?3g6F;u4YoF ztHGH*bNJPAMNdxiOBpY0okkg%;e?oU)I}EKAsD5^mUS6Tl@|2Q5*)zX-YIO`^Ky)q zO<@D<&>)e;m%M5y*CB`5tekH789c)m#$8x~6DKT609`69kFViJWBE^9VI?`g%8e^i z7@7MBnSjDgfA^4aegH4ggiSD+3w2r{v~}VH#GWnIOehpUY({ob!s&rH78uS$n01iX z(SAOPe+vft_Jp*=s7j{m_(5oPMPMh7LeWskrisOo9bl9--FL@bpTb}(k-G_0p&-@6 zH3l5j9ODg=aP3%s#$1N6-cYCHY%%<%6>q9k?OtN)e^|mSabVUb|Lw|l8Y*5-m*&Va zxJEWrH`?TMBRg@fYdcDqhCC(wH}uS*R(8{(vXTr}@Pw+5U|i$#zLXSruQ(buv0<<` zAR|Y*u4iSF!Rv&1@02dSg?pgiTYVk@yvOD<;o)ccPi67*9(Vh;Hs*Q}OWPu@pzw`u zH-1CFf98l#}ob42yC0w(sJfCSXQW^#^8stWT*RHnJ8+vjnGKZQ7 z3G34u;W7Id()44br65Kh0;0UDzp~KAVL5b5dCygPjmAc*G zD_$b~Y%>g5Dvc?1%yb^UQLWX5lvB=O&e0H>e^CKXI~+rNa}uWJz9$9*BCZ@3bIKE< zGG;>28i?Bp1u$4rt-Ro(#taS-w;JpkXvD*a3Mf|q7@0EZmAyUZ)MHEu+d)zoSFBe9 ztBUxfml8qw;fYOLoB0Y~BpaqvCfWa%#_z7a<+u^amN#EzV(iiN-s)H?z$5}hG5}$_ ze*#jZT79v)Q$0KT?CTmb?02JOHw+@buCb@3>F9!|=-`fa>Q9{! z&t`@ZIp3H2d%NvTZuT3o=oIn6!jxo&X}1#(+jL&IIoJoR?kaxVxbQ!4KiYwM6Gsd2{ zFm_+%3~?V2OV@!hKr&892s_B7Rww|5i{2RBnccRCq@nI$HbPhzA^8Oa)WRHde}UG} z8ymNi6!|H@A1bNQwXPLxIyHq(;Rj}hE~$0Hk*r?6W6i4_AMDCTd2cC>1gKK-35}31 zEBn^Oz10wHSTHQXIZCkFL&oVf5Tzm|Z#-##7)zo&1o=%OH9U7?_gRFtdN#RFqILaT z4@_F!zXn1X;+5`AY_l3dVBRVnR>FB=a^FoW2cvEg5ap;At94XsRezm*z4JN5o>^=~k32zRQ6vHg=N zK9r#OCH{zN92b+N1UTDG&i3E`=W3ip;&!mfHiw?8fB)aBck#6aHYQz=@WphpExi!! ze=m9Pp-jEue5r_ve{f>e=7Lb!PQHa8%@4%xEG#OT2iAx*)Kkkz872yehcVVwD( zW1e4EPGb$bJbf(>hbH{PP5}>69<$0J#BFKg*&`C|LVOGRL^osXcgR_SO;fL{SBGT2 zR?ItXXBK`8W4Lri%A5XDiSQK=Vx@|X*OzPv#xl#zjfCNIfAuHiU#%2V?tNv&l!#$e z@dSOM>MDMc(uPSiDns2=O6#`p*XQ6ca0O8>@)KJ*1Vr1qNYB!tnuvq1;ui`hoa;<> zhf)O>(Qpn?ZB0u=%1R=`UOoJ$l~lQ`pfvdO)w-WF<|Tb*G_pcu{xJOhe?t26_<1O) zLv{m4(<7k0f2}tBvuiG$QY-KAt49w%;fa0q|AiYcoP8cLjJxS7YGw`R=zcnA6&2Db z%;Dp=S07(rdC&}Q#9kID7-|ps@Q0uL=JA71@5Wk9DUeEsKI-i!6O$z?U01Yf_2zD> zsJ1ZLbTvG@3{%U7wjr`nWt!u|Y<`7Eu}89{(~o1Ef7`m-NHr1Jj^-pSBSx8C<3{r2 zaHuJ!V0_gY6_KF*WqU-s6fwY>1d*{|kX7m39)-bf)}XxcV^tS!I`?f0! z%Kpz(f0P}VlX!LDCs^3V~0{j>RmkPUx-AyJLocO1fdu-#V=_ ziU`t8s@e2j$?>kc&v_m7rGP(`XK_!eeVZ!#MsEGzi=T`BjU=Sz4DMJIoMV$NBLll( zsZ4F&p%t79o41OP2uV~oI9eiyLXkyIOPjyH-LME%u&~j7hWGvsL{Z@(7@P&@TYP&c ze*yIhYlAnbi?^^+#hv|m9li@k4y`PINIJPdTR83{lBoWKG|3VfFpJGtKrhHAAb;w? zM3F%XQflk?s_nM#RPQI=;i_>uu=es*hJ$g3k;w4G$=MtSD5q?W)c*PCa8Adpvv{#` z$ATgX$|(OgwX?g%f9}t;%fOg9wUO4*e`(Kg+{}GWDmYx-)EgXszez?P`ro?Y+=^~p z^&>DC^QKHQjaUCRuDruS?|{N~G)p5^Gzlgo%A<_zO^$PHyrKx37e)_YLMALq>SM z$Vl~u%<#e7hBw^d43ZVPO!o$Ke^HsHyl_|4W2Izhz!d&*B7IiWFYt&PmP@p5p&iB^ z+A|L+AWV#yXTmI^yyJ#M(|J)Gc5zYgzhEvstlRJ1J}Xq?TzXi-a!&l72hwEy5qm)e zg?U;GW-1yOG(S;CUEicZw9Pe#DmB<;FVzOJ321%Mz(is zlE@peXOf48x)(0r#;`zqKHMdW!Fr~O>3^f39!a^27>dIM8>#6?jn7T)@dTB*esFU< z@&K=PJN~yVkXR2~e=fFCpWzh)sn)t@zZ;3c#6UfBM+jXqb{ftmWkkHzzi*ncjkS#%2teH4v7^n@QWjPALnEI#+bxR;9f2{l~XpwTAG%7p}s+Sqa`!Z{Bvs{B%=`h<9jrmgV#;A>h&(6|*#e0ca8$%UEaqN;z0m@>)x z?14QNpC+#}X)r?9lNXw$vZTmVaP7>HbLgO-dEivgZ=f2ewqrr_!3~Hw*C@q1Y3Ozv z?weD!kOVGIf9Tefso9ToiCo?W*t;;SDQq;u)W^!D>uSyBWpPbALQjdsh0AI-X6o5X zPS_?;ZrKtRA{h5Jl*kY>+!BGH6oX%Qz;fNvw>3CbYS5z*I$8uEQeIY%EO+T%q|=V= zK14sNWXC*GisZ`YYEr|1!`T*ADQX-Td~egy75%;Gf8gzXTD9xRHXE}oz06~!wtBr; z@U2c}_sn|lxs+;=mqFs5&U4@!C%86>{|>?3z4;uAkJhN=K!60dCt~%gkyDbsCmkgG z(?yw5vxJAe=lPz4a7_9Af=Wc1?AM#B8}yIJ-(2RR>fVMHz`UO;`t!5mwc@9gc}P45 zcRFaae;ekOqe$VkJ@Hs3p%hSgaLKmio^d5QV%)bu_`$%RUXA-A-G7yOeG~IpMRoG@ z_d_aHdec+(~S~L+l{QOKyt!U=q;$cZ{v&pIjh$Z(jrfuLn|G| zycDi5CTExrnGf8`t4Mr-v29|z(u4gpL|k&se+q(Xdb(WaE{Jk7I8SOExv=HF%ys3G zt4xMc^hi?&I>Mq*=l_1H-K4Wd+Gm7-$ux83j&^R0cb0jqRgWOUdQH3`!sbv4TyIQN zK;sG=tvpsg>UggD~xl`QOMKATc$ifRwdJF(4J>$Bkd5gE){(~+Cg{JI= ze|yL`dZ4B#MdC#TE4c_TRYJV8TktEKvrufF;ijO!w@5Lxu)s`c33NEJE?e` z+t(^|4uCF}_%&KLNTCbLIgy;9t}$*0CNRlvWXY>*a8!9S(kQ2hB*kKRp)8peMh22n zGJ+)6dZ4aY9lCSzj76AP@6%rQK!B0Te-QQr38Cpy9ht0IcfyF6bo%hW%re%{V$C>`F8ywpT`fz z?7nrezrO3zTRFp@?6UjmlrFYw@IpIn`FOTDYxMIU{Efc%)ly%3UoOUfVVJ0{e=-c8 zPh^^g4eIiU`R#A;#|C3Rw8A|GY)RKMIqyTzF8A@14GsE9o4dfnB%&GV|S z0wuSdK)(WD+r^!fFEdEksKAL|tKu3=Y^Ug5QD%xmEM47Pyf_O$8p2PSf9Le!K(F3En?bIexDFLzf)QQk1X>TVF)I7Agi{UqSL9*lS4dtVGs6sQ~z|M^jt}H~RNc zRo$@2o?k+?!kFq#lEFCae`jO?zJRL6Ok)F<-{Xuos5wLAiX@-Q_|P|9pSNa_{o3Bj z&<>ZzTT-^n!-EY6YE$Vfqm0YtAu?}ibgS%WtH(n@&ytEX;2UpI8!m#5G8?6;*V6lR(OvYohf7nC3CF-N#IKEE) zpa5AcG)q+tRojn5|Cz4EIXb!-C*$Vg#bCI9>Ao4_I9k5YyfVTAnFrk8gDEUS z=Aa~O=yD}gB`G9OLSKrB5BIf7CS^-tOz*IlkGKv9o2gPW>=5+r zyx6^;6QZCz17_V(?HxH>9?V(rRv zc_#PsBkxX8UdnWl0pm}agB|BLT&j;uhpcd7MMlNFKH8Xif5-2d1WA#!VtKc7=Qeps z@0D%%-;6vh*~{B1KlS^HlL^npQ^F(VY?BS=&16c6W|?5upK*TWol|qBBR!q0w-U?O zYRY(x92{v^DNiWpwu{VH>E3~mqf!;~Jj%$iH!CFEiv@|^4lJT_d1tE%P{s?MS=dGD zAz6lVBz=^#f3%*6G`R6i8BwH+l*wxujG%&bULaSW)t$O})w=F&dkga_(H!HUG=EAk zl~>1=xRG&TWJ4(&^T%B5l#g=dn5kK^UkDgW6h0XmdN zeH9G2zJ$k|Z9t7K`k@qtBqA(y7}Y#5*Y2OuqIBQ>f6I&1GpH|f%buciluXFK4_eGg zR+w>JiEF(v<~`4TvR_>G&=GkiP>JvewOKnUnQ4gg&*&i0W8PKduEWuMRcwi`N#(o~ zD$6XVV1ot3%s!$+DqYFXRK?2rhKp%`oG$)-REBAz8XuuHA|LDoA1i&2Ct@LVS^q5k zN$C5Se|}}8G{C<_uM&gR^J_`T1j;WSLpcM9N9~gbw7Lqjk>EXp-T^L%u_#UtkU#O9 zdb@V38i}znHkQ>en`z5ajHShU<$sHhCQN>b8+uOvddF?FmDDRE1Zr8t8?Z<&ZV7SS za_1sakqPcOX>}#7%VZ3oc7u)f72j%Q#=z@nre{Y#+^wK!E{lbbvW?=S7nkTCOHt?aH7MryrF3n z`dbm>1oef%v%=)gP)^p#ts#kfxjD1NZPpQgrAA$ge<$;VX+?~RANtw=2 ze}u-iF7NsqH0!zh277w+CKgs5l09*t8xvRxVo6C04|UO+K?=Jlt}NL>*bpfr|zJw#hkC?*T8#Dj^K zCd4~-Xx@Mh*EN7VpOIb%9h_HCFp{z05~Fh}6sv;#VkueOoV@8&s*eah@r2YS`Ab zd(QGer0}e6gEWCR=etg@8!6&}e~1?I%E7#ls=MGMF&-JZWnQT6i?l-d)CpFS{hBio zQu0@oJG>o#S9vb6jkXO z#hQmzC`oX{k$iNFg`J^Z_AxJueu5wyW6@$k$boNvjfx5#h=M$MgOM`gf9L^d3T`eal6^Ox3rXJZ z1gf;Gv%OU)CCXbCuZ_K3Of6&~=uV=mI7p??Wi$R8NKm&dbpcmIIF)jZ6G0^TxUiac zlF8mmi3S$Sj4x|oN^zEl&x$FDJE9&CVMz?HM1R5 z!H0yvL-m@T*%4Cef551zRQ!&)Lyh<}HFiaLWjh8Cw*Ij2_Q2H4jc^xD<*9mWBc+R% zC*sKbc3vG1_d4I>W4G&`^1lX1ooRt)B>)b{565Xq+cZG|NNkXl4!zh9Qw;2ybf1cq ztvB+CuRdo5K|6Nm2AXD_h zMlQdbXeB000i?TWgcAZSReppI)Gz>srpi%s<#vX@nW*IpnQ4zJVX7Pn8`>s$OK@~! zN;!#OX2yD#3Xf)2Y%2b zA6jUYjdWuF#NJ^rqnKRe8>f~4WNdBScP9~?CW1KOBZ;`zz(55n3Jt?CEbKCcBVVIh z?yl-bvCeAwu8B-03!!?vrjaOsN?R0H+)I8WjOT3We*#a6H7a5lbF|u)F|9cmw#W5~ zGLW;`oejf;q*a-^8Z3Sz8Bde$^f3-~;L8dT?rP%UzO{Bsr1c5x)ng0@jBqa;Q7U0jf_Bx4)O2gN-f@=|Dex7_t|V16lQ zNy_wY{a)}QmXTG%fz`cp`Wu>1>$i{1?@}wbe__9c7Z!Jgj$BuR&BK<$51!#nP?>u- zv&1jLl?M~}Dvq6@!ou>w`om)N2NkztgYua7r`Xg~%N+P3(tNR!cnD4-h2{qY`K(sv z!a1~bk-pSZ1I&i!Tl9?7pz@u-J&JdDnI3E;mycovsR+GW9xTXdx|bhc$!v=#d`uR; zf1{6MSU#X@=1Z-fL7~Lnk|0y`!wUzQtT$IcO8BQ`AB$U07NTgeL@YjGP zbwPztzJlA8~`WQ&9Kw~9_Y-BR%Bx`zX_@w^@Zy@(#(}=rQouR%d;{KGY&FIe%!CJR2k@HBh*v&n_%AhHWT2x68IjGUsy%|e2f66M0 zaM4R&stQtQ-ZQ|3WIGbTCDJqj1ta*Ws)>}eZ;iSzSC<#C!RZdI)=0bIn%dYsIi=Hx z=h1L{d5|mp7f@M;GZ|SmVFP1c?Pzp#JVsT&HgUk*N}$OcQ2!@yZvwF-6@b%&-y$f_ z-nZCYij33#b&vg62!W8Ro$51}e{g+c&uD%n5~+2? zaQnL^o^}IZpAyTnudr3ATGEi;CnaqQIt5F!qNp`%k-QP zWq(__i0@ONq`Ix;LRE!@5caCYJABBj_ZgBw+a1&a=zO-c;bg)~f0V@s@4ffSchUJy z6g86F24vt;?_of6GM6KVhT*S@uYf5lMQQKDu3oKXs`H8|PFV=y&j3BzplGWFuoA zDZ1@li1(=2=fTGHhEjS^eqmNNtZlJ5!+MbI3Voz2d1c1IB{6v}x%>n6FyKm~c)jgL zd&d3|5y??*cfuu((wb;62v%HJ!s;$6IgIN5p?tocwrcv$e>#ZsS`xKQVEj&Rn&*;l zabmNjewq>=_s2kRl_Aa8l*6dz!*VjT)~fv>t`wvTX6%n3Z8E$NT4ZCn=f7ESaJ90H z=x4a0M%efbxB6JZwwxai>U8X|NqYV)26>ez)Aaqm(+cBR$_YsfIM&n*87K?|?Ppg{XNz_=GRC zcs;cipnnMekr>2EEc&k5Z~<;$hys>1b>MLeBFuklf3Z_Z+`5W)sN7$9sZ-50`DU}n zu(ykl=y*}Jt>&hs6mLDRiAqTmk(V~rvir$>^j%J(wn(4c9{qp+H-tL|F@N_{snmI+ z-Mh%1vkMZ`=?=rbM+V^bJ(jFUHKMak%egg#YuD>rQUp=elu@%)@hJipWZ$fc>3-n1 zebxR@fBe1zXf6Lt{Lbw_ziF!ahvGNg^WrJte8=-#lkk0-ggoYAeb1^`bQk|I((Y$P z2RR;batDX=E#*+w1Y~)DN}wiMv&zZRsOqN}%yBB}feciAq#Q~cQD$pta&&OObK5@~ zt7`vnC_d$b5L{!4@it5g(ZQrQ#DNt<$w0ZGe`VPQ)&#Al!3+YjzQm(W@gjT(4!Y#8 zxqPp8b>su{K%HrzwwxIMOr+XG5~e%I@cp31jY@m{^$Z;ARWnM?Viv7ZL88sO6N zj$TL&hJhTR*w9Qa82EP{bR?Rz8!!HIYYIio%Zxb)v5x_1QkF+HH`BTH`~l9wf-e=c ze`nO*Ga2PrLJtXb_do->>3lC?pNm7D)6Zu#A`1+Q=q|(%yvO&`C~kd_pX*M9JvF`+ zYLavx!$Dhrd2YY~s2!=0U;G=GWs_#qDU>j2ABQ*HvOlECs{zC?23nrX#rZFLbSi2d zSi5-p8f`nxu@b;ODoKsDHNQK8rr8Rme~(u~8rUbP;%UWNZN!+I`ZM15)3ir*tV4e@ z1qsj>fn^nxKxS7Zw|lm^pT+^KLvR!g&ahm3b2j9 zj%EJrOgM9Dy~KT^<_)@7vigL(e}MmNJcp3w(8PKO@(s|k^>B|SUUkJ1SLcV`tk^iW zR0tbPAp#-^+nHaN1O7ISmm)+qq&P^bl>#;(D%}5E{y`5=D4wVeCK7H~{QGVpOlLm? zlDeQgC^-o7d^~zhN!VdjHdiXTN1S2ip%Xe`RFhUxLtm z&2jwo?TIScKE)_G7}N7`g1S49{kPjr;*}%PJiqiULX0 z`V&3GA>2H=JX^a#Tl@V_en}~Oz^SwAiqiaJQw>1_N{KBQtnwBQMN~x;g~e~&`KoWA z5p~b>2 zca*zS36;+mP9;)`8)zxrgqha!a|K)j0buWKg$Fu$n2Oso!Qg_wKUg(+7bK_c!Qj< zm*VW$IJh0v{8CVR2>*v-Gi@PpoZ`qsQ$chKjb&OYW$ z)4VlAELmLGe~S2S^Ut5NSBamUwq(M`I%&dj-1LlJcPHZ7oAX4pe56f#@$w`s>iJF> z=%woVCR6eV;Z@Rmy2CRbJV*Rd@sBRR*Qx9i2hL~@SkUn}V4$p~t6s-D?K=lbf3Z73=FEHJuW_XuNXva}JO!;c zt0^gYV6j#(k$fm_ierEEoqPWg#>k8571dm}wiVgWUl+e~SHo6IrsuR}z{Q5<0pBsSLkui!Pd>Z`Q}eR0M4WprDb zJ^woHe}qwB?(!BjG<45QA`;E?=|hpgd8ptCS*O(w^KmTk?ljX+X(YLa!)16>z4}!! z$ArzPWMWSm(^kb3&Puu?Wf-3eU&*DOrzlok2iv_-e(}Kv@A9O=Ue3OtUO_f8bx)l@ z<5?}^XHaHWv^3m(D*(R7tN&M5`QF?hXj@9yf9~(yu}+ccq!y6ZyPhDrHM+bV=kyQ= z-E2EW?c>tsGq{f~*0Ks;GlyKs4hco-Uv0OYx6U3Ff81+*?6W?l`{9jVC1XJWIjo?> zf9nW|1VL=7ArnuqjHLTyLHD}@8$_Sko@!BVLPmNTt&dk#kLX$8>AK~!S}Qh1^tcZ6 zf1JSh4V4(q?@2$->)Gtf{re9uS@{CcV$*B3z?+gA4K<9S>itKTJT-j$>K~yUV;ZG* zC=L1K`0_t| z@I1Nm1iloQawB8H>-T^ISXG#7RT@D_f8R@#b+wBS+hP`+s!5TwWbwF2zE#0f-W}Ag zp#Up0Ip2i)>`6AQV+sqhf-hOB!+FSyCt}l_nKNk(7*ze~hvN zuVe+M$4W2(&cx@4U5t}5ULQ~>cMpu`ROAxqjiOM{9+{ryb!z1x2l&(8FHM=#krQ0$ zKeTGxNIPRafj{c+&i1E;89MQ6rkUICNkWN@c;|WXy6+|P5PLR6f$lz*-#8H^$sCBB zO?ebctfC28PZ;O0S+9{iVT(m5e|%UhHql%1{c+b&00yb`Es61pUF zjXFO`<^3(?Yl2=0U0}TVU*a^VplWYKFYbc9ej2^-xOFB_nMf>}&;f4!jJxQoneSof zbnZ3tgUcd^GVYd8C1{5-$YDR&P%v{VDNmc&Z>+T{=2`Ws%QE+W%}(tUq&Nxw`#(e6UH30HI91+t}tBAI|PLH(k+Irxp*YK_BP7ONLPpvbR8{#`jm~-z23T62PXKBe(9LuA@$ZrSC4wVlzfd zTNIq%8myO2bB>W^w+=X~e>()I%SqxU_}DjdT`LsPfdIPu=_g3C8|BL=no)2JSBl11 zv3yo_9rqvYS(tHBK$Mg=DDpznLi6Y*cQ5sdD+=i%>ztNv{r-#j^6F?;kR&O3N1xMaDv=B?~f; zg#^s%eWaMmY`#Q~5vsj@{-PR>)>00X;}+iCJEdqUC8a;~Cz2i@%2}p&ZLhU1}x|`Prr>I{60s zdd}RfRJN*%Be~nVE>s-QUCU6}5=*Gz7~3af_E;sYUQI?#hr=RUi7K$tLJOWzCiU9% zjh1F??n5;!-@Y>Tg-X(Y1>)O|=f2qL0%%_fw=~w#YWj|3Rs~sMG}dB}HUM9M{>S$d=LI@M)17SW+hnE!TLFW;?Emsb^wD4-dVl4G z)HINsjFM(>dXGn{$zkm_gGQlM^NSe+Bbk8k>50P%)*)K$Q{zww^)Lrgns*OWY%Y^BHZgF?nGS?sO|#Y2B!_f@=(%^Q9%Cxl@JT zC#T6%|GCV_vhO{4$@7ITcO6x6M%ejd_Yp4~J~TofG-e?QGCyPCSL&St=g+gKazF4> zysR@tnv0I8HhOJ^;g#OpCCZbL2fz}l{r3HirC}f%`%v@RTT#o@I(_ZkOe}q9d#rKV} z`^ulE)UxpZA5|07|AGvbRrWu1MvwOK?b=aYZhZEJ>S_Bu^ZQS5mP z-u~?WI6Jhs?SH-hb7PS2`yj)u#663elZ$tZse$-ae)C^~{@#~{Yo5GU{D)BR14?Jy zgP-`&Q_176cef>>F-VMxLN5M@9)vG)~CtHq~yOJn1~6D{#kcz zeXF;Ji};2ZaV~uaOPAww{OX-oHI*7bl~ll%J@`=(bN7j|xs^C<;Q~u(_Ia6xmoApB zXP(tglMzo0jPj0~%Y{4Qr{{{wK+Cw{GCfz35&S@M_n+-qGa|iTRBCwCI$jj2U3L3! z6T$SZFn$U-xYW{wKIq%CbqVfI1UoUt^ueI_z8;hjsiH_(^3;PAv!3tZM=uOOv=Y%2 z+cXzRnEo6YUwawu;65{(pW$UvTU@EJrmf7CMA3Ze%RfUS)_9ORxL9RwMbP3|t>w}M z)o}7&b3_0eyfi=uH+qr|Ud>9mG$Gdx>U@?zJI)mE9G0->b%&DNnx`m4J(1S|);OeS zE&>Crm}Qq!&z&7@PQFLz5%Lz$`-{Bqs_Q$y)pq0Ay>a&$h7^9?^|sB%k@h||(!o4J zJ!j%Cv0YU`geR)mxHFIM>n#uWpu2R^tgM;aUDiyYS|deJ#si(o5JO?i%~;(!8o-R_ z&qU@T!x}v`2}D4)$I1#peV@xWkIgEeja$4 z4k7p3W-mH?u{flb?;JEd$=MPfpBmC%T8Qh4gVH5x7I%vj$g!)Cy@reLBGa$cJ5ug3 z1R7ba)4YvRhX(??mVZ;JLgAf$gV*&DvnReg?Q#LNTM$OTIH!j9;B0`J2yJtlBU9iM zAugHU%}aCa_K8*Fjeh~${NxEA6wO$21Ir%2cdqJd)p9Or?=^9)pRT@4Uj#=$6N_@| z&_y&$(5JG5Do&Oi3iMTC*jH-eG=|tizZYX4XwI>Y+oA@*9c?2_NFz}VnegE7C(gVV zwabi1bi@9$(_9O#*v>q97lN?YLZVIT&ENz{xf&op5^JThcAo=qF&+%FfF098FtbGl z=~Ye9OOuIqj#1qCPt_n}RI{UE4%po!XvE->H?#n60i;4f+aqIOJSnzHy7M^3o5rSp zQ*pWGY&=96Ai0s_u~=26W{$rU{uAo*+pN5K^%o zm0%cEb!1P4aKTU!%2v^(bC6;?*qo(=74+#AD$+m9=+^z0nkQ)u zoLTu+Gmv|Vc@>i3Gey=5Fr-ZU9U16Ok2WC$axJBFwf2>?PbWLhsJ>{Ti8Drpa}@m2nqm)$SKKbERa7$JXkZ@J|@=P)3gX(IeK z%|)-yeyowbnoot8(eP;>J@T8ajXFEoPmgIDI~d>)?+V+cuB8i#o>5F_#qM&IX?rv6 z(@GO_$WPKhxl%^1h5DK+@5IKg#S8gpJCfENJ<#iP3KvdNiZU01+rz#6b#XRMH6p=| zlUU>>?mw>w**ajd8bvO!qm&2IeWZ;*!%C!z~V>nH4u(myi~8Yv*+LBQebaTRQ@ z1fPf4dYRcF7b8j3?33P3n+X55RUzGq>E;0FJD|K|Y76DcJcrDWx_8)HdP;1>^S$Sl zSrr%7j2*N}D%V|RZmacH$PQ~;Z6d3eC%mqBiQC>p0;dD$F>DzoeA=3>j=@6rHA9|p zU@N}ODLQP9mT_A(#dO&8xb}v`3j|_{%7&N3+3suB&`Q>$UY@7|;+E_FIj${wlPCai z-g+N|h5TE!OB+P2n*;KQaZ|V*^yN+U!{xEC(JtW8p^i#y{f_euiVeezfJShX;A+xn z3Enak4Zg}R%pkbiY z2pFx77{ksY#>ki^nP}JwIW<2;pREAH{b{jDF67`2PRg|d-gun9qhd_25kMovHCCe~ z0S##UrS_M3R6F17iVUjg;wEm)h>UL5low>BKAUZK~7pOb!1#^HdD$U9fr9Qzr z(IzBkvMClGV3dNK%mX~|i?vZTP-3G@KW850#3#Wl_!8lRO=#AA+qdnX@PPp|I`V0o zbxlJpiChe;#R7MOK%Oj(b3R%zr@Z~LijO*G?XArk5I`UuGrJW<-~J3;Ya3^cURGK> zTbVBhQsc|Gb<2>cWBOp(Wp&hDZtELKY_bZr3FF=TBL@or*F z>v&-{vp@2-P74Q%z06vnT73G`Xh%=4tSUV8;A9!@+BFyu=xIKu5^WZ~S^Bkcz zC@H8shXdg|0@d9iX9j?rgb=FIW*&UYRYu+1L*_#jm<5HzrECVbme zMcd55`4NelXczZZMV>d)FjdLGL?KDe{RBWp;m7HIWtCpXA_NfkJyZd2FG;8UvD&0i~-m7tgPPRp%5z}$I4C6H7Ur& zNQ6#c*g%D^u|Z36=j4;+W_#aCDn3BYGzRc79P|0Zo03?%KjQc1R7r7ctJQ0L@gIXb#1@SP=&de z(g-8G%PiJsc8Dx0MDUyaN3(e4egxMdw{!IxGvxccZz2k>#A%Neap;58|D__cu-XSy z1?k#9c0NXqylgo7MTt4`L+l>8<1Qi-&sXm0~{hXX5(NXQ+s3r@nRM)zNd(EKe?n0axR zgRv2@bgRAq>0X`#z)$H=`?Z-ZTByir1f51XmNR*7VPd9cDZE9|w=OWEZdQYAA1dAR z0|sdDa5izwe>!ZYi7u~nFA`LH55g5?Ckt7c_DUnx*j91!(1?- zgx80*W87@&uiCc_6F;hekxJG+HU?@IL(LZ8zJ{#tMrGLo=ER8f=`iIK#D@$I`b=#I zpzt^);#$zgyf|HWk%R6yW~K%pCG&2dbocfc0{8!w2l+y{A*w8(l9qY}bx^u_wT$g; zL;@&ga&G~Pw2A+M?0RW}3Q%;XJ^zk~(eUt6Ulhz+crTQ^7g@ydIs%<4+(xPZyi1F!sh5`MEYIe+Vd>S4-T zZlknPDW+4~*+NJI*gu)x_y`NIt7h!l%mF&#`*NtI$iWCMNODRlR9~$mw>#~$z{JHp z^(2M)VmlytD`R5wLl$je1<<}?)l1B_#!K<(o&^8IiQDT)L=g_MlLh0}bb)dTY`1!b z{19}U7I?XX5vQ^_%g&(rC2}NPNwuC7^bk_ZhxJffRIQqX&J;C!cKb3HEDnZCS3?-&ynX3{Os&>*Ba~vCAGaWHL zE@GetRFg!&U@ldhBB}}joXr{ciGM|?@&;MTVjN8iuSbehuvYt6Rtd(WX7or#F5z8o zx4ci=#-d7fylNLT$YV&Gq$l zR0MKrCm+mGeb#BpIsYV{lnJAJ_#@{T%(9Pt>eF>eDv^Vf1{(}|&~{KsqybL4550_b zj$u`JB39a=ZR!EQgYg_MQDH>MX2~i>=+5>+_}ym~y+gF=Szp}^4~|ML^spRm+StNN*gb6%dTBi{>W8$vA3q z?IDl4snb!SFp;{V$({&D05h)kW@?3ZYEDco6NrY)&Cqn`dDP#soB)72BkUM_K-Qh=3d5_u8y?F?-^w=Qo zP|XiS81@T))xEcSfgVhLJIXL_{#BI~uvYVE^vPl5t&Dgb`Hg?D|zH zmo#OKcE9(It<+=3i3$C>SG@mG_L;39e=v=Ss!q9CoN?&}E(Ks2e-6-S;Bv-<+qXLb z`VKJ;qRKCmn_I2sq8+;WK2<#2$xbJ4yAG_533iiNm-6FrH|wSjmgRB@qZnu4X)RR= z!46$_l48eQ``FRR`q)-ogsW1Lt$Hs{O_L?T5VqIL)j9Fe%E4fnnx1HdxzsE(iVZzN z49a(ntZBY|ZUMXu40$bzxUv=izqbXK&s?lQc$xNWv*5kKX<(csN3rtZ>2l8U=!d|C+4 z>m_$DnCZ(T^77b0VjACBNbJ(MhS`tEBUD~(t-h>8Nk9WCVasny8ePpGF-Ak|G*2fl zeT5n60e%_U;xU##<-Mz-(`aY8pC^n1sJ^lvvBccm>6YFR%ipDh>^ZSI%g1;Yj{Z0? z;w~Nu*olBxQ8!JBVmQRx8j|&P!$rbowX%ZUSN@qK=zZ3DotYaQlz!uVC6V)|XdM}R zLim4ZT>$U&`Pr8O<0LBgZ6Hz7^oq zFTTUrXtd(ua?e}k5ocD_m}dmfIvp0DP+ZT}P}w{u@I9e}VpCOaa5K>x&ccG?PopcE zqeM&#M+!sQG$VB|`#pUQa@c+f#C;;>f%GXy7siJaBHjv8Aq5jd-mYQql7-Mfc#=u1LKc85PnU zOBr>j6w?p3DJ#XwDkG!(NrIi_g~-FDuK3qSaJkMyY}Zf7AtAWj8s?GmDl~*TNVpzW z8-P{I%F?FC(p%UDjA#yT;p)}BX;LOE7&pGUh*}Zi&Ax* z&ITFP!J+F$)*aqahf&p6Ydc_W1rE`&L|I+^K*qu#s=|ZrNEk!Kw9Z9$TRbifER zHkWc4JpWZa^Ue@oVe5H3Y|yW7U+s_B=cU88LsI`7V;{4L8U|q3t%Aqb0`OM%Ip{b2 z675dhwcD@;H%|l%;=o(D#W*O_=c$$5)@o~%*{THX>5rZ^4GVMFU zfdG8MEFxY;{OMm>E!=+a%G!gjIG~0iQQ?@}lLEb3n#)r{Dl4Be>m{jK0w?nmmkt#4N%+qsaX{5 zr!CG;&XH>fgD9$OA+*OYoi^XP^;Dub=lGcP*Orm`a$mi)%X~?&kiLy#vEv*xo$pez zO;k*{UC!i%1^uZUJu~w#GTm5R33WFw1GFZLJ|n5qg3@ofkIA7kk|A6=iE+6y*E+^=UTrJ!UJeO{?1MHzh!R_vFzLw zh$njdjWHap8Fc*a7skqQ#cus+7v&g&Bg6N(jEmZfq5ca6aCRi5E+DS-M9Jx%G4f-y zX=%9AK=CeSF={k6Oz`4{m=$&0is1?`hB3#lt9JJ4p9Wketh``NifVu01DaqA{$7 zQuT|zFwNXwe~=-TW56>8c)g_LWO39urjKG8Lvju+%fjd+1Dca`QicWL2@Z6?&Ng>3<(J zkgQ}4dr0Pzgf!!A#N$O3Zg-v3m=zLg=5E-}qw|xXksNyD41nG|n>pp!THy`-mCJ{?3ZM74-Yr%0`B){5uQ%-4{FkpHTQ zYH0lsnH!pc-xf&)_due|Wu(!uW+O-DlQf0JNm%9KZ6cjHcB9@JNpQ0CP2pOBF;wqy zLqSrvs$%{TTm!hlI3?lnR3e`1)n>(EVS4#Q6e_*aQZ4-eu&M&Y5gkB6)=*Rb=ZnNHr7h&qo>AE|rXTdW=x zliPO}+i>|G2;TvP^@)YjP_f9M6f(*0a+;nY$4*oV14}cnsRa=|UjyZZurU}>S}DIKdve?1SD!a6ud>btm((#9Zg*cqAH>JWhJkPO`; zdP^WP%A|Pn=w<<>Ju*ovf!{yI2UK@|Upq=nz%)qeWMeM2>#T+57&Mf!!_taHoF<%w8G# zTG3Ha<-RwQ#SC$>kKPU_+t5p`ZvifXp&qVew31Hk-#4{&<)Axn3ksbH|RT$Y^RO(YO5Zg*xh%^To*<|1{ipO+njot7|B8+5G zd?YlI%YXLb)?dC`l)0FHRidcf!c}*qKSUkjI=?%^81tnNXMeq>4(g6~K#&7pQUJql z=&Hy63`|H(IU}hc$fm%7x5sl}6vPTjEPJcGxkO2g18(yC!PYJ50x`!e(Ws-wYkdm4 zvVxpja6dKMz-~_8U^3fbmg)ccz`VyZm67^_K-c%37wK%5n}m=CF}DAr^wEmkf&Z-? zwAlO`uh<=?nL?6=^#Q4W(+a>z)nf=GVp78C^7cr8-!kdM3|X9c|JE($b;Hj)(a z4ae+U=U5hp#DTnOXAp@iOm8aeU||J46I=7#WVpd*^M_08L8mAJ=5`i4vk{=L%mi&b zVlhFAl9QBezHHp4GjOzJu&?`!F3;lG7}?nA6ps9fY@@nw6ANvj9BWmACYZ8%70gYq(sD_YW7*#ol z5yw3Hv*>J5WEWFFdrJE0se>9?o(rRXa&s2Y53+dGwt;| zFO+QpEKf`Cn>OEc5!dBP+QhK%!SH)HuBJK18p5X=c2vP2M&!j}Rlt*vean_Tg&hme zLPhV+$eX0Q_zcWw(Ca4C52f&?_INz;3!gKt?9rBNBzEALY3BI@tS`d|Cw`EjvlcB# zG8HFUT@XX`^P>PClz>I$E>9)S>5`{Nw*8YTRu$OVJ=s!slEyH|W&=R)X)aZE#?_{% zS_K8*YK0nzBi);xBE)$RE6K;Vs%jh*a*G#dsXEdx{=>L(E7Q7@yliuv9rm@GIm#l_ zo;PJyc^&%uM}B~xd0BwE{Y=z{c#mwc$OV#=e!;+UEGnwa3s4A3V-q$sCS*#<;SL{y^N3dgy!nTLn_j!URp+RZg=|CI7BPn%DB2BDfh7Nuk2yoyNW$)d zw{m>D?P5=d|3=A{ZpDjAngHb_YE_?QFu=E-2II{lfc9d7fK;cP#KLN?plA*qR{Q%4 zQ!j6i?P+~X7Le)j2VH30Eu~tg&FRn`ecO(c0JVDW(8t)I?bOMhjvig17mm%e?Lvi( zL@8#5KtI|vjE1h;{;OhrV(TmARZzR{&sk0Zc6s%6@V_7DQzb8T3h#=YY+m!qNX1RI z<^v=mK}}2J`AzL3+|GM;X2sZ}Q?XmRz3kntr!MA7JU~7tY1T(5GWdJwq{@j_cYo+o z2FSgVN8;E!GFw%^4JL(@)|!{ZDUvw5p3-YZ@GtKNtjJshFH+@cQ9a%>O7BLu2IQtlRO;1WB|qsT1BVfP#Q#fl@S3+U0LF zM>oZzj{w@Nhhj~PbB1JACV{HO8U1IJ^&Hv`U0t%KlCL=t%U%(;7V2aP*@9}j8g_YB z-H5o1mGZhGerbsw_Gr)iYnno=XKOuMg^-Po%|pcruK_92wfm{wl6zXnH441A?BGG2 ztYlS60gTRySmYD(_cE{P`lr1TX9^Ml z_o+{34*Q%nW=!DYDvF^P;f6npQhX7a|MdS9?PVsD?%s4KZd_mcpYEGt{X&hCqSxG% zCMW8#*T5Cv154aIu7h=RxL!*A*5Ih-EmR_5fI1sNX;5eR#i zumKc~Wkrk7C4?sVFUT@qMf-GUfvLz@kSx;NI!0RROe3Lrq{OmW>EKmWS*|O?3wU^6 z=<;e5@Ot*LdibuX>%GVnc6ysce&;4Yx>h)d zHHijBYxt{H%L1`=b_^U`XSul4Q{0zew1ko>UqoJb!fhlrLl&p$_54`Nd}v(c%MwqO9! z{1(&-N6dN&R^4tvj{Wb0HS9VlNO)T@2X-_ilRr4w#Wb#g_Lk~A0_E01kxmh~@I^wN z*9?xrV7$nVzW30Dn|uAA++4CWto;UXaX2k-7FphX6_QBtt5Ak}yL8u18$fdA6pWr_ zNz7oN0!OxhFnbhD!_;=um1q9Wn4FAuiqsHsD7x<%{Z_B-1m!v2=6N2|>E(!$eWzMEKjxmUsr{C!mRkL6-c43VpJ!s^g)PxRRLSkzJmZJ-G^J6+1_&g zB$K)dBW02JyYij2wn%QG?GGgAhU_AV^6s`4@La%ob_>XB+q0wZyXs*Mb0^tT)f7^_6EXIF^hHHu_vnfsA5+zde>ncLs;_@? z(RtURFp2dnwC0}Cb;Wj{*wcpGra{n-Bphg^g!$b5wo?SQ=~Rh!aUxMH=IX8AgtTGN zv&|zY%*+0Gz=RB9wv6dG81BSiskY5^b-pQ}?UbZUMbFjr78dOT%r4%Mtn|`c;j5)f z({N?r&i;%z&{fvSE3+600>y!uhp{EKiIGGryAO(YuOuEvj>8SVFldg$xJE%0$e<$b z2dz8E@K!~@9l`Vhi*s5vh~p2svlZ1?M0_R4!d;mAbkEBgb01kwRA}W&2!NjWFu-~{ z$gelNH~Q+5Feh^X@E^^Ic%VK^jerV=l)Sg5d187a!4VA%RC-hyjW?6TbJN%Mx4BZa zJO-7&6@|MEM$$}%KeoVqA#?&NZo6O7|7XceGLG(M!eVirj&AYyBoMFEdb4uB^d5*f z8$)Rm3IhB%gD+Y2j$3wo;y|6{xS12g5ogAIHyJ=;pJAVGvrClRW<#tg9x-@3GFvW=5 zH9B>Z(qy8rw1*a^)8gLen_)@fF_cRqj#X)pw(ZUp1oFpgotghG1paRCM^XGNS*Via zK4X4bDOU%e9U))wrrpq~9wRq6zE>|EpD&_H3gS{`hidyDP$TO6OgkV!FJRjS^Lqp~ z{c2p{tS<{~XhiTG*oyI8`#Onj13Vc%uC7~wZ@JC>Mk8tL`1%EJn&qK}YtVcuM~R@; zJ}1$#SO;TU?Dz*3l%ZP2757iuF29OjqCE<4PuC^Dd+u;Lc05Hy=3hPvIR%Z2lZ z)Ta|Vr=s+}nw#zN>SG+LY_5uqEx?dj``kHCHb9F$ritF*8)4-h7~FDmF7VEDK&f#= zjVuNr9EJ?N&u)WJ)5=$yU^0ff0PMls^gdckdhfznU%zw*ag&-aevcrL-2=$5RUo)D*3=5rY6t($03KwhaC>m@qUw&qQ;<^i?S zS&n;;O3lk=zThgTcRuc>oBZrycAx&n$#xAup)zi-c8>h!W5}Ze6ou_BwS7*AznVF9 zISIE{Mmbcq{U=SO`!TY%UBSplWwErAR`W;(F>IFe3DHI3(@38j)T0BQI z4!W(`bgV?`K8Si<0X?_N+t050*=JXg!5QqGah~X|}U?{hj727jfyOsF-dQUm? zEf?ib57r9(wXJ3UxKF#arRL~h&BKzGi!%JwK^d$~5|(Ty_6W(a89ij2SxQ(zI8#6! z4h7;jJ8hTPGE^zEHFKh~_iob@B|a&GVc8IEXxc_tZzzQlclcB4F|yDXa*P2M7q4t1 zhPLJ$jHi>!>o>x|$7YJRp9PRLZ07NT*0l@Xld z2_q9fGj!fpb^hMTiKx4}XWYyCmUi$LKX6#v=wGeXRIJe4Fxa<9$FK5xUXNPo=(7#I zz;q0Ig+4H?LsE8a!`l!0 zWO1C3o6oG)`B32-Ez|%ke+}=Mu;MisIIuuiNoFg+vIaRY9U(gq%%ag{_-Iii$Xx;= zhwKn6BWkMqtj8oVU_Ei~iP0~m@OXNe;15+vCXVCK(BAAsV47%5kY{)BeYb_Zx+K4q z*RP8;-7%0?XSZz%RQU7oJBWlwqEFb!N?qj7v1}1B?w3XFiRA%k$=3d2?Xhf{o@TqZ z05T}hdvcV_Mb>@t=?o~*V+mLrlu;1f`eN(ffRiuU7vwEb82r1o&7{6y9Xt%U1OY9a zaVxCn3&(h*@%_+LV?v^6RPOB8?UCO>V`SIM$0$qDW6^}UD7ULVJNA0o zFZWgPAcn!(-0cLZ=L84sQP`9gA+jHJS`P}!lqG~|-6MQ9>bO&E+cGmiZn_*fM^B|A zhtEV)p6toIe;k=>P$)pmpXL*Rq&dYBgRk76mmxi9 zccg1(;ee~HXDUE5SPfJPjrGj9R|LdqjpvfUmaDiP7G3ETS*cJ5NZ{0v&yY7GD;_Tf zu5touJ>~OWzES8NF=Ypaie{J|`ZLJ!MTZr`QM!(^Y_)0KVYb}e&$%lz>tL$NEOEBx z%z?tDD;AKtAiRH}f*os0JWX2rDBnBTb@=ViRnMt+GJo(N*zfmDuf$Pw1kde17;^`T z+FL682tQ|B=7jy&%~mWWLbPH%x*&Sx2ugxR@1Wj%WA_`YPxE{jrMv6_%=}gT5z1vp z&oP`A9)8d$PwWQiR_5mOd%ZS$95ar+hx%)rP#%EXrg$n8a@2)Ia-K5hYRUh;X+@GG z5Ch+D%H1aK;aJTg$Cvh66U;|S3e{s=%C!?3JUYDjT;gCJ+Fj4xP?cf;jG5VOSg%H% zo=SWD^_prj^2s~hSRy=3*l6u3iiQLJ>7{1X1DTR1XxZ|Y9KR!_4zwHXz# z7Yy)sWuaeAxFW z^U&&=6sMv*G0$ts=XZlNB=eaH^0Ob8PjeuN)#P(yVQZ&hHp6|zWv9z`q(I|RSGni6 z`%3N_sLnaI-OXzR$=H#4j+QSeJfo!Mc8phm9y!>JuwDG-NHtljaDSq(-hZsn)Bevt zD`YxIBjhxV$8rkU5t2`HJg_OWct*$*jeDFu481c*uPN2Hqq{GI#oo=G&LvOehUM~T zJ@9lmLeg9KKB&rXbZN6KYfmIWuEwMZTi^8-&)g4sVw;?x-Io1Tuhf2l^Ft%nTo^!C zDmpLbwMrAH`O4j<+S=mYREa7K@CH~?nf4^MXx?$72vBK59!1*hO)R6Wa-_ENC5d#^ z&2MP?I)FrGtVtkpO{)c)o-PR+64twg)m5ZQYz~2`+EIK`{_qC}wt==7C9=U&%VIiC zpk)7HCvpN>wz4Lib*@7Q?I}}{9juj6noh-oLJ2nao`vgbdFv|2zrM^4{{Uok6yFqx z4UTtaDQ(6bqA8P9EcZu~PLjPzx%#lE?OCsSGsCM|4|g+JQYiQx+ZmZ^Asw@S>p13|2zs-of zSpunYoP2G!Qkr`%SIG7v{6m&?HFt>-c1p24oI_d++n-Odk%!9Riq?T;hU z%~C+35{DUf+TaGqjw#C}VGO+vipr}HS0bdfDFW-1n2K7JhR7(QBAJ5%No&dG!*6%F zt?>AhuH}lR7!FwYww5^^04Tq#jOYJtDM$)=u7QRME9TA4Ir#xKpjt&l*|Cf@zNw}W2ZvohAe3O!j8~rch=bE9mWjFHrw#W(9;diX1=%%B>sye zaD?>flU>i7!Qqw@iNl!-VSav6Cn?ex?)6n>^?RCKu^EGy{NDmCOYZCn&U&U};sh^n zpk;*16qF+s~S@49d#5_LG8-R=S3`%)$fi*>M6_7F(>9b*Hnm<*j%ara?IBX<5E> z8Q=Oh6ov@A2+qhS$b5jaL8^LHRL-XR=0sE~L8NcHLmuofljHut}#AfTxg< zJnJh2sTfrJVI$py%+8|6A->$4t}EF%#rANjN*6u8ThN>vudBxMA7uVk|8K*aKEuPB z_V4eZ>Wgy>+v&z4Pktgi1&6b_q!Gnw@Mix-1JdVkHoqJ)0j3u^NKUz(jfyzPhrcp@ z|F|#|jsL$gS#v=rl2sxCJt~E#xAEzP`lZ|XO zDRV4_q5U&0(7Z3?G>Y`|dx{@rlEzdtQ&Bw6ok@2N{-2-#eK+t+<0drr#i6-(p5OR$ zs512m!34v0%4OT4?KlBa^KMTYOMf+>qQ7pEunE6cv=CLSlkq8W`2JB2;IT~*GS{t` zOgrO~8&9qNU7M5UR#xa*|1$M{wJ!Z<6HOdvqB6!lcYZnNV$kK=u;VFBE|u+j4(-(# zgJ+F7*vPxL68{ofOWZv8Rt)DqI&JemCugF9&tMSg?{-@mS5&o-3(-N32JV%m>}o;PQ+t&I7L z=gR}4sr(a(6D2M$c%y;~om?o5E*l#Kn4FUc*evqGetOg_NV3UpaSrUb2R>Id8^kLE zxJBSf2@y8?cua6GcNA{Hh$JI;2q9|ZPZQqyAchlimT9lxozc>(fNi$2A}|6X<&ire zX@h>nZ4%#z-be$D4u=$Wy-(Na2Q-*%+HA~)?fAw4?>o3*2*3N_3tQ-9_RqlC8n$+7 zo_XA)T%gk8^{Z>$Jn2+VhQAILzK^cZ6d`LdwDBw|Nm|R1-85fa8eZMJkSd)Mz{66B z#EBzfH>ECjhKm|c0O4tYF`LkD^6Nt}S2lcK-cHpZw(%l!6&*#RG{dOAKVyCmRm~s+rkBj`+&XM$ zv6IZlmEok(B21&QWrt|c(OU3FzvfrK#6^3LmnLF?jg_Y_Yb7XpwjM% zEeInwZ;x6f01*R{)+D8itb!}>pG;|Kbu5Oe)SuQHZaRpLxOkA{+QIigY0K62C<=F& zi69Pp6!Gf|USa%v8y>6)InPV)PAi1)dd-tAwNSZ8FiAnNqz;m8KV~7R%Rey(j(v%e zh4{fGUU%Xr*KIe|k5{mPC{h8R@X~~P{v{9F22=^vfKSnfI%>({aNChZD-<|GGB!J@ zLYZ+tNa-e4v1@rZcZIgQ*IcoyM)Q0MK04n;Z>yrvq(`;qe`MEH=dxN{f46IRfOeZ@ zRTdu#ywxVDu|Y)7sD7S4R-B%{akn5bywUJv=%Xg-$yXf~6c;r}5!)JD8u9GjpT7)b za`u%?0T0|R>sRx9Lg(~62Q(wAQrr^;t!q{7h%AnZ7Z(uDAiAZ~QRhhsK$cdGLyK1AdnPawAmdm}#n&E~Yc}b*V5VL}Qo@~0~CXH|suQflStt_g!g{5I13L6E! z{)Rv7=6%C4!yjiDO;Npb9h?K*TPxL-)+m@mXB;dUKVH&kuHp#KdKAIO9L;DOZnlxc=1`R2-Zl<*eLh- zC<>uh!gn4sxU1lkRb@<1GDehDwl;$PgcP6lgo+$-ZRt(_2t`baI+fdR+FLl_vt2dd zK6^l1iQ(cM)&SRC#x4B(J%c3a0~jrN)-hR!mEnU8-ey^6w~{8WCfvS=#bjQ3PxyOT zVfiGgs$l0dFd#L1Id`02rZB48C0M<-*mz%sMOMOw|be;CDv?S7rLMghZ18zLcA_ z$6B)Cca?;Bhd#t=iC0P+)3Sy58<%OeZUvti3DT)Hfon4l_P^vW(}<=I{b~RG;;Ui( zE_R1%47t|tu}g^NhU1;8-P5DP2xQlW#{%e$hE`Y6NelBi_Ybhg6jQYU@B}5F`CguYXYqenypS1{|7@ryuXBgl-dV?oU2}3LsyeJ zgCDfRVcAq#=GIENRymb7=i`+(?j&YN-k3`byh#SKb%W^Ci#ox)HR}S6D2;;5gy}N4e-r{}W7Ue!B$vjL1oZiB4Osb1qx1rEU(_VUc z1+UwHUAEV++I}^06iB+nBu4@{P9Pf|Hs5-hRLfQ8lbC8Qw$tGwx!*YfRXV?_bW+vt z_2lzp5mcwq+({4gxxas_kA5!vurIe1cc~)ThrN*O%wR4!B=Fqg5_(YlopjhF5g5~zE_=9R z9bnVU#u`bCQ7)x_=N(zz!%TuNHSkBtLi7+Hbwoi+T&?(6F6e(IdVi1fxvP&_>NWL- ze5aE5XTsBa_!iE6trLaZ`p$KxQwLJ1X?Sa+yj{v;%kkO8`9X0y_9hoLMyBJ!c z>KV_NXlI!-5psVWDOhbb)mbj@E!+clM?%BcZSLpRdt6v0r#4qQ1mV_OYN(X6bJ5xC zD6E^1FTzT4MR@ac+Ss68D#5P@X1<}V0O%P>%}HxMeV{~A{E8m#I|r2X$2rTHgt!o0 zU6wV*YI8N}v{*@s&N_u@XMTgNJJ6urTIw<-BY%;8Coq3YQ=BgEeNFwjv85Dx%5>h9 zOnS8T1l3BbWJ|3f&Q$4cd7-)Nb>Ec{U5K@g`N4#Am7sj9)E)Z0&03WZu{v){6^!hw zr(I1eJ&9m-OOk8Zocpvum`rw#NanhIenezBt!$JnG_(@?tY4uM+OLZ5#=260cxLq( z@5z@o7PNn=2h$kKa!>AjaR0$4cQFFI>m+r#%wIA$alGs|RZJt;xyW)W5|KjnqLOX$ z<8<+_V`x#QWEkg~`mDdV0<>MI$N163pO03x0)8_A4>^Xcxm5L`xrBqW;-HgfaVJVt z>H}yYzq;Zqu+F1z>!w3FKOczDu3n17I`xwtn$dp-nyrz{I+aa%+}T*oW%tp}Zx9Rf zoOp>|%1DJY*5m3)Ny2cx9_xUQDcP}Ek+UTOUxKzTRsc| zhXj8(&|w!Ql8}{H?CQ*+X3dj(f2A@Ek;yZwoGAVUoND2E4QSs~&P6rv_4(9Jcl0CW$#^Dk%5?_7CGPN)&;abIa&ZX^I$w1&;YF9o*Ia%}o=Di4v$>Zfhgz7T7BYWd zm>e(bt#a*bg_VZe?F8on*&(*qPn|P#}!X^`yiy?qp4Ja16;s^38*kH07u` zJufS?-f#+nV@T^(GYaxh!uhc9DI$MNkcARA7|7&BdF6?+7{gM+k{{5{rWeOJ8(EDL zj-laD?ofzI88WSEQeqzd{N;J_USPhl*4$TiNmZ1uU>GcuAO@)to@A+3PDTLurc8^x zNj>l{Kdgc-;*3k3CCYyhXeLil%rX*a+C`2XO45D}DshllR&wT6+m@Q6!Kr_b2RLi3 zg?{0cnSEJmsId{T6MEI$s!V6o>8Yl?Du8e0+?rvYjY!fN%8hN5BImw)Z1F{iE;s8gDE+ks79*A{_U8r7kVrPnxNQ zdN^GPnS3mY=~!N2K2Sl!E9c@Suf3fbvu$--pG;zr>U*5C27oHgai)!&|LOp1OqsMS zU2h_4qi`)5bVZCzjwXL*7#yK!XR?WGHbP}(LB~}5x0@teSzkQUv9YVrHlBi@|JIQZ ze`GY}Los^mYRSGFbPg2h7lzcB#{wrbqpfJpx2sg2v#1~xV$JJh(tMmB$_bl-y%}$C zTeT4t->u2B=~mcn{3$5D9Y$m9XA&36X7V5E&Q#GM^J@{3~sSxGthRM-$)dIKF+a_{P|R82GpLW*9ZqITcTh zA_EQ!ZsLPl_GOb)mNr`vh;W&?0@m=3bLYb${G62@m*&vBv}Ka@sOqZ*kRNJMu;M0b z!IE98H2ovWhtEN4ix+l%gcP>oT0V#=YRK%IJfo()=M_FLe;NTea|5p;{T zlY~7c5c@NRf!Sie9(vJ+peCdp!?11P$640P?6k;?!5lVjt1r2u&16DCivxmBc9N9( zK!-8P{Wkh4_!{gOoWlUnp5mDGDffJ#a4&bAyrv#ix#JhGkI@w{R3 za;hvG4<>(zQsRW{j1U9YhLa>2~4xfK=^6E~*gM$wzT)-+V`&wCM zQ4!Y!+fC5Yg@02bKTq{FwGF9hx#W47S7&{Yy7}U#U6sgL=c%3?`7?55;B`ugLT`U# zimcPDQW>6dwgJDLpsnJS=S21d)!5fccz`Z@D+kP4ff6&P4Jieo0@j#AQ3`Gf)Sj)vBd<-ba5pFU)?uG|#-h7>#kjf2@fDe1k+AD4|HnAHE5JjTqV zq&8wlPZpoMVd|>EwA-@5;ck+6fi-`@LW)|_HuUc-XS1Gv>2>tR`WI4;N)m^|YiQaJBW;B|u)GsnJUTPcxyUru;uBfZv?VD{>)fa| z&DzGKrXz*78ci2rw>P!qBTawt75*Isl6{fRas*Z|oQ|TEkMr{`sZ!ksCVTg>Wlic_ z{*!K5W&)^4?&oMlUu}?Z_49gFRX^Y<)YkNUATrU_XNVJ~^QNi~rU|i8S&M|Eb&LEV zzD|wlE?Xa1Tx`C;(FhNTKg?PZAI%`9d|@pp5@^d;rQN}z*AdF5Tb6(6*Fodje%p@# zh3{RJ)&Deg)Q#komnOOG>eb+Q&Cf5*1*!3Dv=z;b{Byj<6^NUbN1^A)T=Rs?H>wXxr3!Xiy zkyekzlcFqs*U6pvWsb*J+u7F|3?U#Tj1V|8JliZoQ-uHD_TbC0>YZ@_Rl`+NP#Eb z&r7vCDpV<hnb*AFlYa+DTHf zMJAH%tp4n-Cs~07g>hhAenn!lHHM=N>(dO+Kp!hvzcCYo;P?S;3cct=Mn~r#2R2s* zt9{Kc1a51CzqSc3BI_P8DmZ!%)3MLs>kDj-r6IE6mIi-A-4LC=SNxrE8I@Lk1vt~{ zAiZl5;vz^rsZ@L$N9XY9*@&uiXm#^M);Pt)BZR5GejcJ{Vw&bOys zt0eoVbardb{IA**82!C9cd^j>y>4-}tIxRNQJ9;+a%xpI;?YU34>3vW$^nhiG}SvU zTR<8RcIbbGF}AH2RE*RR0!k5A45<4Y&NNsnFO&QqCHk14gbj~q37MxF!n@;SzxZiY z&F3y6)BKlw6^(_R=PV%?B%4&wV+<;dO5quu!LzK*UC0JPsZH`rBjmV)U~CPT?MGlu zBY69`Yapj*K;AmI3EAvd(zm03t8QOd( zYMSnagtG|xi!@81w7d_LdjxQAm|op=kh-Qk-7vPD7mqe&CYvF-!a+7m)KtQ%y|v{A zDx7~AaN5-FnW@{Utk@R1~&EeCVk6RQIBSYFm6dyecy>Oa7rxMo!5 z77<+@K?Osyk?gigj;V^MHZ+|Un4ZZDSsz7TNleC2yne1keojdinbMo9C?6n|nhG?;5em9j zMAsW{1kCl6@tT=MNlQn&J}-EXX{>gEy~Dv3fCJGpZ{bcIm<+IUbx&F$&Z}UxH?Myh zBY$1Ver?wu=;v&wjlQUEc8$N}LHOB|)$DtJoBl$JpPkB{lE3y}{^tJQ$XCNy_9OoN zy!dutsP1@3UN zsmcjEe>VI)W8+EmRC({W%}EpKN^Oc2jCCPppgm6sq{$V>`#Ny?l*NSH@TXexkhH~xdaG!=v_Q(FP@cZ zWg3@kqd7_R@tJAh&s0zo)1Zc|y;1@2M5}X{DfUAWW4YAHH052u)v+)KlwdU%Zs0uO?7{FF&q7kQ+@JrS47wE{C@W8<@s?16g9Yf%D+34N0KYO z1921ijl0B#_6$t>MWDb!x9a~`P}xAatGR#4YTma~c@5i>HX}STkYy=kR;g66HcF%Vd+TVpCo7~>+Q_7~~m+NX-te*P*iP@eR1+$Z@j3>Hf$ zSjyJxs(x8Vf$l_K^Ty-+^*;OGV6iD&nVzn4i%7FmGneM#r?HA6Sf;Dv7E?YXQl$bl z#jpj|)tCZfU$1{Lk`>>&BxOq~d6 zO*#BH#gYANySX}(#BoU-fnXmNi>5_x>(0Qm)L4xUA#>toUHs+WUaI2z%YW=UM4ZTn zFJb$j+6d9aq1AO5>rH!7OM>*#&?g@nh&h$>ZD&bRFx7vm4i>pV8;8P#c~TWC5`Uzl zXjU4Rm8G%3&DL|UcXo3S7YtmaKPa{7KQPq$_uVm5am}3T$+UqHV&-CHi4#Mf1*31T z@*6?5RKJ<+ZcrvI@QowQ!DAfNw~@IH%jpK%S+}V3qAZRpqHU|ky&dLyiX{%a!?b<1 z-u#EwYl!;o6yF+YNM!uF5nT! zSw%yr$RS$zCr!JWt13D{xs5J8^fD@mRHpt{;D0x{@~+g@!rY&xrlp;sjoyYW-w?p+ zrN(kw9m&Wq0HSi8`mSk$v%OWh0P@z3CS?D<)Q- zE1+GIVddMdwz0_LQnIneDEA43&Zb}@u3&$%vLl%j-bhjK&SdG@m61CPs0$K^mKcEk z3L268WvE-UY_Q=2lA~>^;r)KanAXZH?&a}oFx;689V%>ifOPC&Tn1sxaH(j0W^{xq z@WF;M6sYt>cP5y8f7awTJ=v0?(TNFLtVB{><9(zwAOg1xn|jjVVQ71a`XncvBBOuC zqcCSbT}QS=KDze-ZrDfnJ}%%50g>Wb(}K9FS94S9D;D_zK7x`4_{6a9C9FNHaHg3^ zjOHk{?9;V68^`e^NmL96kGoB!IOQmJdFb=5W@#Wc5 zQyQWXM!Es+->Qq|P$``zHu8V?qh*iolzTzx96D1`&6&rZNrOa0Wrw83#f*y0eiXdf zwHTV2S(f4*hYpxv&(Kn=Be^F`iYw|uOVYtF?=D`6rh5$o9kHvM{jMa2GTK(D+N{AV71Wkr9aEW|$ zV2HGyl(w`8Y{e#e&eMOYN&jfv$YH;L zCgSl?fGQ4Qj1ON1#<vx>ai?l`_lgIf zes*7iDiPF z_{fbIsXC*|Pi(9K7?_5dMDZoeIr*>CZrEyT08{)NHKE`R2pV6h-5%w>8Wbf}daSQLK5A>*it|s(Bwc%6)yT0prfLY`g7P4;yU>Zz~fzmIQm% z;}_S}-T8kEG!bFB=j2s5m;I1#czX)5uWz^)d-b-=j8`nwumGomT7o4iX&Lt`jIc3o zMcK|>y;7>EB=N-C^4thqGW(yhmz~lDiAPBa8~Z6+r=uqs@IR{#kR2^}FcYTs4^?O+ zZpv1!OUtA3ypenoJma?HZ;py*A-7H$ZHVrIE1!(w|8e-+k#33keS`kZyBHUP+}vBuQ1U{Q11m%j#&yatCrq7k zECQ(_%T+&2Mc*j#=9Fs}NtEoQ2J}ixTx5G_wn@){hTkREm|%-6$K%XN#>0@CGS8UDN91u+(tLS)OC;|B z{xBX0iy|3TjK|kLOXgMa+N&9A?+TLp>5Guuk6#AK{q$Op+&PpB6_M^}+mx;HsGv7x zXzu3^K4V<_^ut3mmn_x}qvPe|lr#S;`zQaqkvm_heG#BsxfN^lZGGJ61la*SUZQ`r ztnQmb5tfDhd_6&Xwir9GO$^A1+Kat;tN&1)L#~!Xstc$Ej*r*VTrJ{< z(SDCINs&O6F?9g3d z#AaKSBzh5XMIe8us|mYe^*n!*^j3w*v5YW1&LNRF|T8oRa=xaG1pPdnRpf}oh_5sc68@mWfGh0oxbv~Naug;L^@MM;5|b+ zF9SRlhgI_;sn*_0_|wi8hk}#bw2Cq7eS|>g628ig_4x_CSF++gOd0i)1EZgQC}Hq}`w#9P0;4nKnIq?L-A+i9iG$p7$Qqhht*bc% zRY#kwdlkWypE*A>hfsg|D;Gi6dmC=7Kz|3!rs~ZxDk+BK9vdH`rflGKTaLP^FsbYY zvf#-Ez5d*PPURRlb20K=kGp9Z-Ad)LmZpSp=SHicld4)Bm&+fn=S?pA-V1KZ-8?G| zx0sIeVSo|*KSJ^N(X#HBVWL52Y*hmcPeA>jQEL-o2Zsb@6sv#6FrxoW*UOPI7Qd4X zT=fOexUm>d<+RxAMt@JxKzM1(fAv50#$imT5<2& z#6uZn2*PWr2pkP94b?~$df!DP?>)!)7Z{;kU>V5c3`-y@u!pVPow?S ziGDYHX=LfA$JENm9XEngrbJc1e-v;#VYB5}i&_;Tk0a>X#O}^J8)-od|8L(uv1oo= zwaZh~dbD^5Eh$UDD9DM~(^b88`OSARyuVM4nj){4FLHkYI9?H*4w4gj0(r9D_l_U-|7)w_mbNMqjP5;aRm@R~ z1glxNqU3+uy&w785}M~5iaSq4bfhK}@$Gv_&`x}U7qhCFJqiub!>eQ1x2-Ah`HPwo zFJ-stVg2Qni$Ax$MeyXGW<7~{S0Qm}w3YHyaYhNq&8^ za6sY`IusIP+<%@7buwV`AOm?W*NF;gA@Xy&zSy3TNP@|NEK3*^DJ>=1U`SK919iRB zMsga;wbZUA15%Eq#5|OZRv|w6_KE&uE8)9RKAnE!yD$HnN|>0dZ8r?1iu);SsB;u5 zr*(fg3Y@I&Qmva-Hm%EQ2Or^G1X135jNE1k^Rr$hyQr7-RvVsqpp_eq2L#~Vk5_Xd z)JOQ&(X#9NdQC5xr_(Uf0jVfAQIPn?&|&WkP+OGRj;450n!pdIp>#5V@X@MP^k_w{ zei3~Qba4I2quHk|ZD4(nE0k1r-x!JGHPe4;y?5RbaUGK3d5uTV>x2j&`(y~wTWl~j+|T5=LuGC5X_oQF6772P~9%IFQB&5bPXPvW$l)vxD9G7HGeg=Fy2oRwV{AnF*IWsQk0~p$uLXFQU3-|hG5mmds zQH||h#b3kTIVtDn0+=N(mwna$6`a16;PecwdC$OU0~ZiXFRw`6H*7jV=N5;lTiQW? z>kB0}EbUUipg?@hr)6gqv)dRGvH)Yh7U%Ys-_GVP>gD!mb=(mU> zrL0T3WmCu@I{Z;_V z`zK_45KPP7l`X9-NUg$1Aa<1zba{?eRb!)_!5xCcg{5U+*>0+qyRy?8_Y!|`kM?LK zk}2fK4KY~^7YGgV^#f(_Pjq2&IyT^@>Y5OpP7(p{fi@`;#Syl`73sgD4J~^%Pp5$y zpL_-{soeeXjKcnOFH|-NjUZXVBpEZ{#!4+Vi)F8*iusQz0zkQ$#F|QP_38PxGdC~^ zvP;^7MQpLJ#%}6c7hpBV%)fsc3-VW9&sgxo`!8rWe)2NLf**RH^W}EurN)9EaQS_2 z!E8|+*C&&tg`<9Tm1XNgtnuDGYD>=jVSS~e$2WUAzi>mFbpT5fr^yj@Jm5FDydOmHm3{w$$;ywigg1^cMn)k;jA}N zHJUXv`z1Q!vA?hh>_C6MtGoFBC<7&{`&BHQuDTVWjV$R_(ngT4UJ5*X@mf)zn-;erbF6EW&=x-Uf=)(suI_zJ@ z%jd%f`-lCk`%!=D+QIFA@c9Ry`}6nBCtK{tNn#Fl9`~HnH)Xp#tp+vdXkYPJy#BF` z&m0|cD1OJ!2{~DHiJI+>srdcx!Gyl}2~{Icyl{NF&Pea2qm>Yn%c7B<*b$yU?P*z; zy^qxlTZl889n~F)!^0_F`n$4e3dx?T3YKWgu|q_~jlF;C!j5J#;>PVWpYG)5`ZT#V z9szi-Ej+2l7ha3N4W4$Ds;`(9br5NsKc$wMl`TLscS4YNqAZccy`>7yvNVyPaHMxk z`R8ycbQufWlxC77n7)P8K>aIO_$vQ`x~7!7qMrdm`Z%vld1l8Ak4~f zO%Y*}*uj51JvG>~$0jvV*P6Qnn<%Lmn43>fa}y$6$W^y;z9D~$_c$@5s@odB%@@iW z!pF?Dy>Od%a+^buxv87R+o`gY2A+~^fles)8j|z>(cL&2eH!7cUd+k#C-Sn+CQ^_d zvtc?dB``vgNuE%kx-%`UHaLW_eDL2@bgb#sZPR}wd+=qL0^m9BEvu@}>*X>7N-NJS z_8y=rtkvYNt-1-9mcSJEiZ5-34Q@FL^o68Q)>K;R<{*#Jx4NGYuy+^F41$>*5?^^!8CM$q zqAy9UX_8r?1z$HvihDHcbS8lr=MozdcqOQq=z!}?_3^pH_@=U9_r~uuXMCou0 zi}J~rQ5661gXiXx7+}*0d}!X>w|vr~`AjDV$DO1g@(`h(ITxQB4Ln3f00+3WOOe{L zc*_`(9PT~y3O4$2WXo+{Ez(mcme7CGmM4h|)RvG4HUHj|4$*O$a6d|-3=&whe?JRC z7RKJV2;)u$3-mBueghx@r>Gy}%^p0mpOYR)p!qIO6Qv>w%xeVNpvH}*eP9HCPaU@1BvrwwMRvKqoqm{;df=b)Dh5X|p2-gI<+9p4V(lr}7*o`y_oL%P z?%&efg}rHY*x`tY)NmEpVxE8SZ%RFR^KHxVaYF#pNHp78Pr5uS-Fno>c_?Op80HUk>=Q{mzYBJ`w@lQa8OQqt+qe& z2mh>DT=N&EY0(#lfi3p*lEG_LR}GR2D%ag=F8k!We^|s9C>oDa6Q70~do`OQS2R}A z<#L@dHNBF;V3_&d8E1b7yu=sZhAhm2<2aNd?Kdc2;>dB*_ph{n-CV9<`$qKlbbrxj zK9u2aa6|%Jh{HNyr(t))cuwRp{d3YoxeEgd|Fs^r?3uXJP4nFBxh> zi+We@RBsQCph$#33>!*d8hxlHZg@m2eU_fGv#+3+&~$&tmcHZZKIfCX*38fwgb}&Z z#}h5m)2;`Z5Yw^52`x|dL0!3yud7qZP>NsmofR|@2}H76N?aHbb%-6Ec;^6UwF6Qm zU%otLvMlAKM6;o|L$B+4)Xz~#2yNGQ;S<*liUsO&D4upU10`whT1!zjPQu}q?u~oJ zxAO9lVl#isP@W$_ZcYLDI9LzXM2YM)Ry-^-Sx2B(F0~FzUQM8T%S4Wm>g}qet|-?o z7#W0|W1(M@i2_y!92~-wNjh@8r{^;r165Oric3dW9IusYweRSSV#zc5cVkX2(PTw_ z9sd5iIKFj7(rJk!8u17Kv-)nC@>UoVT6q@qcg26Yl&qA4B+JusTLZ5A=-$V#kWyU> zukmFf^9|j)R4i(*gOVoj<+1FWYJd2?-mv~MFm_H?G%6!npTk7adooYVl&r7!G(8W8 zoadwV7^rHxX{A4V@+jrR53?b~89$!(X!Aj7oB(ntmUU~$&J5tzpoVv?-UNSpy~S_} zI?R8HsKprCI&))Tm=R4JM1%O_4cREaGSlLct^ew8d~HGE7mp7o9#dl+FvI#9{IAFz zmZh!7&#WbqSdm)(8`chfoXC;|oa97)VVn#gFejFSCVfO0qC4&!gP2WLFAftpHe4oB ztrA)KWXEdF5>SKDvhX56F)K9h`)WGVs=9wR?!2Oln)9cS?M6RuIjzFyMT@z%z78S^ zeg(bqct!gRvDn;}V-w$7VkO_6gXSxMxf_U4%IOcAG$hwRU`AMgUP*(!gU;Q8rT`1( zdUrJ(qLJI$l!B^m>7#L)sPXihri#5@B`!w7R#sL0GJH-XgDD4i-eJo!?GRXoVflZ< zuToMvrSU5J71;Eq_Li`HbC2=owAkVc=ibH{3QNf(6a#}Rhgc!Ec=)z0R>&*$&iFgo z^U7Rb)bN~Vd&B}#AReWeV~(d2=2gS)D9`j9Z#$$}DZw!gAZQ{U`4}N{lZZ(QPMmNx zuBz;Y+8W-e_&ymxC_4E_3p`~Bp05>ZS;ST8g`$Q7M18CvvXGh#}$N{i4vN1ja)D9T-t#UG<#y?N-; zM=-4*B)guJrB7RgG~Xv3ZZB7y`bf78gNTbuvdWBc91rF|JmV&mUVfp2BgA(kGkV%h zmG(5em)1;ryqgz#;BD0H6iCjAy$F%X0acm*Fm{~%amxQmg0i2^Ec<`%oXtjvs=P54%9tmU<59<_PMnWhv+>;Yvq$C798-Xk*T1-|+K+`*7qO-bgq3k1B zS<25#rGR74(rRcYut>5L1V(*KU`6`PFujwqPgj<6oGd_oSXYzdz`o1&g2N0!AX;2V z0XVIj*iG0_5Ikbp78ieb(=C?yx8j7w-egl8IWl~9-@7IdZdOQb+0&Hz1wezO(`0?X z8ll=D1Sttb{|b^}4~STtEOM-WWJBJxgs6saGIGpu$qC>g4p9-WyLh&%gQrn}Q(;iD z#=YVn`i13(TjK&7W@AxJIJl^8;<8opvj*yL%jlhq z@5)8UMVc~}E#!aL&l$bcb#cDgV63Sy*aiTTeriTIxhoqg4d0Q?IOxs_adiNMwJJGg z2;P$ca}4ue!{!E)KsFCF6`!E`r_?eml6RfjBI1E#Zg-<10H7aD%D5tTnnOMs(rrhD zC*{w`8tqQ(^6RyclTv3?^rI@Cw2`E(JKAw7f$IX9D-?fGPRmvqHl?g%?X<1p=*`~N z$8F)9&vt9?rO>oSeS<1bCrpSEi5zDA>G`S1c^0mJqB9^ib}-DY<}JD}NEHZ{E+zQh zJ>Lg7>a96iNViC_R1^r+q*f$lFUcoHb4UnO7JJFQ;BIPK@`7v+gsd%2jH9X5&rWxZ zBwSYv1$}?Ft~mAV+9~pIYaZ)egzxai;K3ix%?v#0x5({nb+yX%*(p+DD-P`!%iR5S zd+@ich;RzvVfrEPsFg&#Ivzm!TzW^41ta4)2^|vS$|cAB%>ZeZ39??$|Yh{s^bCixrL|&OJ#qS<4Z{f6JOY1{ryhEOEIoBBx}|=^(hp+p;zS za>eU4z8NQgbZv12Pf1_wektr7>5|qR2{t;;X~H>_dXm*Rp!oN<&`6+ zGZ}x^0@Eb+D$FfE3&kq#hNL{ki?Fp1F8t+vc&HRMRU-2k0qHQx-YZ=JkzL*>vQ7a@ z2Sv>3_^Enlvj%Z*Xv`)A&4OyyIprtydVUvp;CfF&TWZc#O*ChyHX8k;toY033de<|ohSff>PGtt4CT|YgqSIjsg)kIz+tM}qxH5&+cz|m5&ARq>n z;TM*ESmHO5XL4(f;Kxq2*Zbq12?CTJD;LkY5=?(g zrywjkjh4m`Nmz9g>M{K{I=OA>0~->p&&Ym`J5qgXne30{AfM?&ZPSEtuiBkSUKsj@;x_Hu7lwBClv!xN}K?AUW zNiL@I7~nla<9;WeIL9W~RYM|x!3kygR~S~-pMb{~N+{0sv3Bz^6o`kfj6VXP6Im1W&6a&z|{&zpOM*{a4klAn9^ZJTAx6^Wq=m z4}4QW^CI&@|6Nt0&?>r<;y3b1 zS>c`sdCn4AM>A=o(0jka$0Lc;;FuGhemZDdKJpkzIc?i!P~y5Ue|$ zOJk)gZ!|fQq=3f~)|X-lz-fQMNKkE-WaKbr_UI7)ICb?4HVszsxlU4YZU^5pK@!A81P#1| zLY+h9ESI^e*Tk!r<0a^CNuWb8=@d{yf3WE`$4U7Ze$muuG!b1;Cb0gI|CD>OtmM*6 zK7^yz%X+J5)?SAlz+OrGAzzT%Rm&`K2IrqbpTok3VzXVPJi31@7pe5nYEE~49f}|#GcbZrBEJ-6 zT8-FQJzqgg;iP@VUxpSbwg2~@q#|*at=!~twX53tl{G)!&Dq|MU%+Af^rd9CKi=ms zrt2ELW; zU-@{b`EMBuX^`}%jO#ZvxyXHRSut?Eboy8R4p40b)}>04g{d1K1@wGCExP0;%ku6m zqFkfu^_$j-S3c{T%Kv7K!ez2#QzmHfD$3VyJm-Jl8|5Ia$c8SY>{Bc`3U%ro!J@S3 z6GzngYIg8j522g8j;A}r{Oc*?{UOzuvIx=`5(8G4u7us>}uSpJv=#{Ds+WX#eSdbBragRe(OcQB>pVukSufEf?^ge3DF@mYsX-U$bJ`uKvfzKX z;N*KL^SCJ|O7(y|4i>OP_B|RvDfPwqfEHus?l@5N=G~BOLR` z)&yemJ6xS(cP>g3U}M|1ZQC|aoSfKpo)g=)ZQHhO+xFb|+syP&s9vkOR#o-hsZ`Y< zd;FDf=IQCs=`J%>qkvr9{l@KrsmJ<~mkqnPPCoE?0@1M-X4K^gsi$N{WNG(_ie~0} zqJO+LQMK8%fv9F%uiGCs@3uUvs@?e@momacwr^fHc_IWAR@FZcs=WwfO~g#k622hG z&4QT=rKY#I+%Vlc@B%q2>2jQp27d&XvE+e?IF3-aJYY3xJOTK+x=!ceLky;AOaTyY z`f9|n$ia{&^tsO*-Zn1fUKlnqrsOR=$ILI7zjguIh0OAm4qF5wan{3{LQCI zlH_h^A9rHVvIeYE({4&=*Z2bO=5$?HQ?#1G^I5r$l*!U07~qqYjlqH@_j}DT z{+UbO<}>nR;lyNjD%{OzVvylzBXU_tTnZl(zfxQgJ=ALsCZ7y3xDH>&M?IizJICXlBqa0CFSm@huBI8yF^v84I?9fc(e=qyr35XBg2x8=Pfy95Bad(Qyx*NEe^!C|n|y!XrZnXEQOTqvHpLtE zC(NGyy~Zc)LYKAU4MRU$=NHl_y-&ik+H!jZE7TUT1W%O)YwAm0jg`@U;}*-`pr!{JhTVl?1$d zQ)wzUh$pT@4BiSN%6w5W77PL2Sd!ipuc8eY#6EB~bvkxmba-Q$4>}@vDKUSU37GY{$kWk+ z*3F5bc-IAc6!wH;E_F9A9W{2WYY`qSa~p7rRGJoYZw% zBD8E(Dr}V(2fx7{7ih<`Y76IWc-!b^4DU||azxgQcM1P(?sJT&F;`sUd5QRgnjHv` z#j+pTILd$z_+>Q`HY{^@cmeo41hCM$2dySsiW5~CVq%4rz#5DVe~4rkGd7wPzvW0eIl~92t=zSk+`hfF9K!@EZHRdET&X(y#WxR4i66wMo~wva5<6VU zw>BsE;i1$@@$?gKMKZ==^@(MR5Yx^BO`RR1Bkey%K?Za-VxvXZSNP=RuvSsf%?sjd zlh?M3enL$=)tPo@Er8O51EFFKlCjp}Eh~%l=4|Em<0&ti$)Fpiv6siojc;EAJC5-$ z2KCla%jDR}yZ-Gw!TO1X;+@7L> zS6SO?ML?Kxe*a~Dc@Ag-EBIpRBG0A;R?(-o3zaeRw##Jr*UJ!!lbMTE0RN2~aviX~ zj?xX{9xW5Z7QmjVq)=DaS9wbOFZv!_nw16 zf;L)KTjgIB6#!k#I1sB!q3pjpR@+NlT$)~f$e(1ak_+-=qBvH<>Twqq_roapg}-xp zg!#s79CcMQ(w+x)EwT#1pcK#E@B2#Lt?{uMPVx{Vgzp?TUC@ZKg6>Y`@ET3PK9{}(kv~-o;ygB)L$q6u<&KKRA zU|tojWQ>PMaf4dQu0JeGuBZ~j1piHWGfvX|gJvZlDlj|D@@L! z{Emhdg8{tkE`nM5UoQBZXTOmDGDTg8tZI;TQ(YhFCH^6A-*um9kA(<1O4}nJeUUf- z!h)Ogy=_0e=T8vm-|~Ex7O5NR+$wrKVGy4l2Sgr7GQ{z2eHZp#(~%nG@9U3{Qgawh zmn^#UthaAZ1sG&e`H+5d>fYN;clNGmu>)hwq<6LX7O zOkVVU3MYssmGjN1Im%3at=Zg)*e}?YeP0pY(FeUI$D=sRxxHW zC|>*@T5^lkQG*P{t;gY(sbD7rUh4eYjCSS&cycKSzy5M%vlf_P$*ES$_vw!u_rctJ zSX<~Dd2}R7QDz?{Hr~Ur9RGlcAa+S#e`_qz#ZCoz`2Ta(&if%LC5?Z(W+YPV;2t2QGG^dA0htf%q|UO zQ_bd&(MRY~{>9*lG6`rv#+%!o9^GNXAv!)vWdF-u7mc4n%i#1T^LxQ=(u>l|Y1l{m}i)((mEB6y+u`UMCFX>$r4; z!#$@fR>`6@{v)WABp$;pj!RFO^F=JZtj1(KK%me++!6BNFOJX88HHF>*=A9u8AlOvD>UoYP4Pl&Bz^0w6Tx41~1I z^T%u3a9;Y1WK)Dn^p*|}Dfe?eY!Pm2p0v-hYWKE^VLmoYk%y~DBBb>|FT0#XlZtHT zk(zHlleEG41mnZ9h`Y>pU_>=}nV5WpIg7atKU@suc(huHhfk0=-WEk=wU{~nIsR`q zEbtS`2qzGdWB(8uk-eS(9gtf*37Nw?3%aZ5H1eu1KJzwn8OQpRzN!oF=81{F)`RXF+{-MiPa%UZfhusBdK7a z$c#3~H`VCU&E@F&@H8g&P{#ZbCE%A{=GhMW3dcB0%*{Bx(Jx9Z7r^DlBu}zB6BxV1 zCW-n8R!u9;d!VMNXNkqE12W_}_vu-y>ixI%(rD6KgFrb_05B|9liA0`T#@{Nf(Os@ zUH=?KOCIntl{pW4t&OU@qjW?YV4IB(nu4z50 z$FVXk<+{6UkL3X!TOP)Y zTvebG+2 zQ%=I-a%LI`JD6}c=MoE!y_m8{!5LGVsAe*?aH<(`yP18zPd*p~+~daAzotz(*0q{_T?w~x;rjy~gH*36TSb`!J ziVSKu&kKS#To^`NhlI=Zh(E?|RJ|0j%O{lzP58S+oI)Ok-(UrT|Hy&vEV!l|B}it# z9@(wBG4R`q)u+eeU2z&Q!ingT067uk>A9ECsWX@v2T3( zi{(h!1EProaf;!T3y1DAgi_zJjbC8ZI7mm;&`_vpzr!CNSAy|=t%1lGw4=Cj_qZyz zS0z%Jm?tA#vls|cgrBR3fmt4JGk6`W46jkr(vuIIn!9J?U&0kOP` zcSA(cUH|pkBe`TcJ->G`bQ(mhhwJB7?2EPP0KW4o%VT-;%-5fVvi+Wf5bU|L;|P?h zg}TU|kygWMtB{o_iW!wg&9Dub+M~k4O0|}kd*Ls$D%-D@Qcc9xu#!!j^=QhXd3U#4 zgcG`4Rh>4X>E#PO2KFWIWlN>xh$-sg8F8Ay`_6C_mpZ^K>g=YlRmm2F4vYdQ1x0EN z0SijgNXJ&+r}}t`jXmxKyQzCJx&*v!dtQ&aw%OljC>{oC6v?mZcwzwot|ZC&Wg&tU z5@VtvhA`M>Htmvcr0xt2`O1i-**NReliG6ix+gH>YI5Roe}^5e)ms1f!c{5e4e<2| z{4FZVvc*JvuEFDgh$_?7-)w4qiTq9K0PvR@O0hSXi7biq31Q)Z{KN6uzz8qOExm51 zgV}=7P(ahx#uo#e!B8Vx$?ZLNnpyW&KC7^^eK5+jMs;k5@0C|~x=dhBSsD}On*=ly zozn&Ch}hPYHO@s!uhC?0nDtm|z_=%t9hi;-K>=cXbDzs12V(jkY5HGbks@&T0mjxv z^}x^HT3+crKFiwJP6G8J9sp_igXjLu58SI@3R!9L$r__MSQ0uB6fM*8H2eQm3kP5k}t|St|_|VSG<%ki6Dxje~F6o#9 zS||~7@lAOt^3!}(t$szpSUo1)*O`VUNReZu=0$$>RHP`sr%76q=-CW@mqRLXE0^O}NkI>O|4jp7V=b^k*CmpJU3M$(c|iE`YvzY zVe7!V+kxk(`+SLP2KdjhLQG>KR)kv6Rh^iyGq&&p`cKhJNz~IJH%V^togSX!M)hjN zCs;`&tj2es1*6BDAh#TTWpa{zd+o9;M}pKoq}J zlgr*&Rfq^pgS7$Px@qwfPkpF&_PPaAHtm7adAE4t7&QeGiaFN=c=I>wFX;-jhy0A- zdxoXJl7M9?gn}jCxrTl~`-X6N6prut%j;XE^8>>;)qae*@?Z67x4n+6)RexVGbDr{ z885u{#QIQ6R*I~K)V?=7&@6r9L_asl9CM_Ndk+n_?hC~sa5BjooxO}zGaFrA>@5VW z&)P~nC-o61yT?ihSo|Vl-f5Rik9Tjeu7OFLEeObsxIf8{1?QUvD~e|7H1=7+0DQE zW~YutM#7&@d~TeBhfR^sSbK5ecHgzhruogN*EPOa^|Rg%fX-$68m_y!k;3Y>v@ih6oP&FntR+75!rw_7D_FitFP;$2lWkSIed4z_5VU!H-v-rsVsJzX zz1rQTEPl+wOfJaV?ixHrp)+A?_G_i$Wkt2XqL1y>qJ6>2^SW#dOi$TFF`PI#A>*jFSX#%YTuBJy^{tp z+%RGUD144tDCMRSh$4NxJ6lhRvOQ&F;RHjT>OyO09D%gzBS6V{g>O#TRPfPR+@Z;B zUu8?dBU99xnl ztv^DQvU-g{9OGyMCmi zrZ5@`^8iWB5}3P3FOwdbpal9VcuuobUH)*g%A-=$?y-RJ>>;fw;n*iz(#Thmm^99@ z7{gD)G$Tb!JL+*32Ke{`=EkXvuR&-JQPU{KI?>DB-Na&>{_0{5eF~m!-QDIqrk1LDOHOcF zbGqdB0y-nrcM@_Y!sX|f^Qt{H%ta&(X%7+#|7-i%F&5tI;dN!Yq+U|J<8k>Q$3WwS z*5|7@d`x?IHdenF@b=!ls{HjO^?NsNFq-}TQg|!y!QuYz^X9v$*OTF$Q1YK}9{ePEa48;^B4#9>R}BOEL7Dsfqk`q;=kl-Am**0?i0Hj@rL%khng z|BQF`L(CGq(UTeLU_v8_4cKGJzMeJ?`d>en2A!b}31#nY0QHWI;UykUR#i(#4CLu0*^(HC zHIMZm)=MZ<39NRf%gr{)QgyB1GGo{IYpv)E`NC%2@3Iy0*gK8S=wm{P?EdXIFD0uW zUQa2nI~*wzz?g1qK?p=&5x0bGYth_>?8KM}SHV^tgxrt9d3*5*l7upKREAsgn+lvA zI!?HU6&!CBcDD{gH7u42Mzf~jVdPr&nR1=;$%MAAt7x|lEX$|_2FE&{7x{BAg!bB! zGIGVISpofoiB8q|efkddfk911{ZhTpHG^vLMzRYtz!`wB1j0cDF)lw;upY%@l}=*k zisb=-*^*LbYL0ZAKRFeAYagXTuVlaQbWG!J+qDnUSAKq0q9#c-^*e$i9n|Yqmo?oV z638gks4HeVr)NAUwRNtYC66WOtEY>uVNKU9{7ic*XXYk)&c{Z57t=Jh`^&$qcj0ju z%~x;?P}bkK_T*!W_17_(rmbyHNY_^YX6Z0_l7%9*9t)X@E`5Vi!T#9GBFh*03=YOz#oQL1+1k1|bz%oK-5!JQZB5v>0m z1x;)n`^H(kh<@{xL#EMMu;UE0lE-!JNvBiLDBn6@DvxKo|Atu}Mtw&Z1 z7zVpyh$zHFk|i5lvSBB6@G9A6V3Cif^`)VS#22FpI6~(lP%9;kp_V7A^YzNVSdWcZz(%?5T zipLzyJ_6ar>Z>$^r2jhGC7&d6f!+X<%iRX} z&>nITjUI7Y;xWEF7=hsavtr%nGa+%pnjgVIEcL;JyO8(M3G z5|`gKtXKkiWcI%=29wbiP3hV4`Yj&dwIDMjA9f86%2+jZQ(%E;S@j+EA2p#F5AD%M z40BF33NrY#h`X5@!F&^t&#bx8=DjV|h5oS(IQdTs$KCKA4mK8lJAp-t)JIa9^DfI4 z)9KCqAPsgdLfUu%Dx-zRtkDUwoXkH^+#>}apqyO8E&s&)q1v~dSh$hD^LA*HjlkuE zrfl&o9N)50{|vkr)4}N=6%z(Y4;IHcz~@{yI0f9bs>vjFgqYqI@Vyw?yrFR>*bbp# z3UWoVySp%k{SBFDrxqK@!o5|tBRWhfj4Is2tW|-i!jx;C) zVdASZ6MUmwQ@N$6b5dv^=+zLN}D$wx6)UEj|~G@Uxt z6s=O-GzAL)=8)h>vzQqzT~y2+*?swmcFH94^MgxsfzF{vwfPNtTq z!?O*j1n)KjLvglLFiLgt&Y7vNI%h7k4;zuVwdg_sk^*L(XIbHYoFdNSiB{bU#(dIr zB2OaAL=5@dSJM7rb`K$)tgnVP(;ENPQOM70XUcsgkazSu0Y`2#)|E1f71($xRCxBE z4|lPRN-@jOi|UXh!__`P7$K1Iy{WDwUR_E`0$DJOWX3KEn8I9=2ghG5L7wDNK9TG42qJ;Eg)A= zV@JQ(TI}iRtd3;=CBOGkG=Y7vCix9!lq$r^HEX!0pEf@+@08fNMO&jjVh>$9 zKWQ`JdXp$u8}IF4bg}6?4)_d;ZhUu9$=Sp1!GdqCWZWTiyNfW)~ zK{5bcK8yyKVuWzpcteT~f+B6%Q}w)-VtAdqvE z`&EXClJB1opIdMnF|3!y^2L|T12&BjITTQW;?vP`Q1j5%x1n(nIvq!K5PD8!Ogz3L z*1D6w0&uP&6SwzCY?h*Zzr!L)(77AGq{7A&>74UzIwl}!u4jZ_H9q0r=?RX>aQ%bt_3;CtD|s=hhXyj@jx zfn~izU_ePN1{0HIU3{BOGZ*i&X^P);sj+~c>HV%pTkFt~ky$B2ymabQ8p%3S7*q0K zK5jLzIq@$jCc7Z6>FN{t%3GcA*xAqC_C;@9WzLh-V52og>-_XhdRfamN?GP64 zv|!WDKV7JAS?6EpR%lHyif`}Rj7GO`_{yF``76Cb7lUd#G7M180b6XExxc^6Q%=<3 z$Ub)D3H+<8g7s`;4YZ{L=tYT-O46PWy^es7%8vlwJe2sdzMMeELl-|v;%^Obe`<)} zd2$|Z$(;z)U0#&Ey;#(Vg$gBEuN1H5%%&IZCvAh%`kbX7E(bN z2&gVv2lpj3r1;RffbUTT_}(dW+v-L>j=$RSS&t3UYJQ0nIxXZw?fLclc4ROJQJ~LT z89t)iDSr1BtGFpUrPv6Wb)X-T^`CFj=j|DWG#hWI5K`7YL4nUUFKjhuuudy3E?_ft zg5R@Vi70!kT}wFvn*PYmMs2X^b=K~%uW<79<-N_uzfY4q7Ho_sdU;KS%GPth2Y=a5 z29qE%Vj{=NaYPX5&5Bt#Q1Wlslnx}hp00ME7ftTx;;tw8#kKt%OevWcX&tBVy9VBG z)(UC={5P*DsHOPl7ATL7ASn&YzpgbKrXwQKW0MohN)$pA@c9Q4kLqv#7 z-@LsL^o=ShAMkzuyoH185D8}^2)cJHIS=~J*{ru5P_K28!Se7uT3;+jdF*Cd>iXsH z-v@3a%&wq0a&#G9R+&oZhky^R?1W>8Jm3xw-ComgxcwZx*-}d11R^y>gWU3Sx6>zz zjXVpw(x%OJ07DUC^gRLHa-z`TNw4!PFRxUxU3McxEg#^F@q|)I9DLHi>`h|WYd@t9Fyau?ywmhGd$?{k|Q}p{h$uWqBG5%ZR zYlHETSKMhrCY=B`3#Bj()Ohup{Fg7@{w~A_F85%p)zdLbPU+5YBC~6UX-&!HTd_(y z08@}36}zKp6#ue`_L^9+!aIakK^KD)nWUC6J#f-as1H-QSW6MOgf4Z>0sg;+BMWm- zZizGZA8P|`hfT)~3{j;nGQt3JefB)Cn)ah>;@TwTU`Qylk?mvK$n3L9O76gpEy^N6 zMxGGY{MM(3xqXr}Itb@!DHJxPxWdq7z|!n*mN+J>sPQ|QviK?SdC$g>kC>Whm?*GD zyZ;}&?yj;J|4lM&VZ#VdMcTg~j4{(v#RvaFqeBQ~yDy4Qc-$xYK_;%{;J1bHH^|~^ z*-UAT9VQtlhGf;BaHxhAqCkO+pmbqgMVrKmkSoS`d$>%nY0J7{PVXmK1K=*H0B^qt zuCT58?RGt)WDrugG)9s69X!&|8%hQ=c(DE@4(ef?-Wtok|7jiomop%VvAXL4=KHmh zC?e3!qMOCY7qNXYu!^Dc9x}$uh0CRl=?pe?#qCneAGi}D*M~Ck^9A|?E%qZ?!yiqZ znA9j4<#(wIzZ$+6ff6y%UKT=MfGq+xkQ_F$jL%}4U$G(bganrCB-vqSJGGkTGK=N7 z3uKv0KeJWHSeb!aQ%R6zbW9tSoOZqfm!LBD1w`XWS&l0;_eMh}h#ik7eFyt(eb6@S z+66|IzU;Y#-y@AdW<{5e8nOH-zJg$6#C=z+9fV_KDRSkzfKYBl1n#Y8K<-4;=w3gN zg^|kEisj|X7Hpuo5!KhsK`-*U<{_OHnYzktrIp?EG(sA%dv`^{qPAv#=*pu~Dywtz zo6+qV0so5=YXYEW`35=kq=dW7NqEho-M?NIrYqH?0N1#h^X35kc=l>m>T{OU0O97y z#U5XA z)-+!zY)Ac#_3bVHMe>`^tfl29dtfW_!`R~BYe*ymO=h$GticX0qbds3qNWN<7^gFH zsE?u8EZ0aB;O#(r;rfrpUkWmBM*W++CK$!|nRF}#H8dzi%F}uXpm!b)^$c#R1IULX z(SsV{OcH$p{OE5A%Xq;i+duYxe?BjFzYlMJ&H=xN{?FK?r2%Rp+!RgOMypGrPP|1{ zpcCojL2IXJ8mRX1+`JesRn5BR#H^_Od9y*u`Fw@u2Ms8{ZeoVKY!|!6R?Hs>f3;dr z@KU@ZkDPl8W=SppevT%?AL`(a7T7~rjC9P-GY<6O-c~y$Ui4CBV~=jj;^?%%OB=&F z*OUF^^wCn}A5&ELV~zias*`cBr5L!d#Tb5fV4b6f-O%97(t|gLgb+BKc275%qIMFE;Mgex7Qj z-4VaieJZl-U@X;mU#TAYNy>I0#T3}*+nmV|b-bgC=03?1jSpzHxMR=i^%X6WGrV2) zXnWlAWa$2#4)$&@4%n*VCf;1ik(S&(MtbwI@;@n6`byaq%q+YKsN8Hi-UOf!t3#EfIno_N44DfNJ$ zBb;%>KP{15+d1%lAI3YS=Y18;V(DujFVqtO!XBja{oVw#EP%uwKzcU2u2hpBxj5>V zPbg?Ik4$4VH^RF0rOldwq@y{RLV&0(Z2lf)INXB0M7M3@8LUh}}F zUl&9c(FtCma*@m9b{WV~ZjXzI)O3Mx_^K(;e2nV8UZNB+)yaDi1QZVE>8l#7c7@#m z6d7$|=?^+*V;|LE&!XTaZ5g-3uOf~c)$`2%pu*v}?AJR(A-xwX)_z8v+7;X?$EhNO z2gY>*Eh*mU@1^d@4%0N@-c(t`^33PhPzW~GZ9fGVo)y7PuF?Ol{bza@$m2Ai7GFLC zBDF;0k5$F~>AcfqRMn3JpM$`C5DIPu+&qW|1StJY9S!QuGf#6HF9^ad-^*ePMTs*c zN&bWBD9LD1qLMd6A#1Nk!#82v_@uK4++U$fiq!FdLusUDuuq~e1rkrrrdKF0=^K@X zl{_0o@KSwvG>@fmPjJ(v19Nts5|3|%l4sv&b%O6@#M+^FDAM=!)6BlpDfX)hD07ms zse0+lu;86mk{0^j>7p_Kbt{^l%jhX)G15}Ka}Fu1m@7u_$kK9!+{Ap)r@7A%MzN?l z977^)#`k=P$_P)MwF9^%5N~EB;@4f)Byl$`g!Awx--?BFjXjl3NpgG=(d)y+C)1(i z??JlXxp_a{&JyK3!X)(!QIp*RoVYC!_iFc02=<63`T3_Tz3%Um%Nq0eFXIVQl#rIjc8CT#e;iyd)*AuS5 zvS6SfwO|}~BSBBu$ydQggY<^@u8Nnq-Re#G(Fm{Ayr+R_x4d$M)n-cpyjANxHh1_W zWAfGGja<=f(^dV4B6-a+nCj21l46xze(is(aWKiR6vJo)(Vr3$>oX9^FtA_vHjg(D z8WtLLsgwOjEB?vIp=Q>Os}I6~6lyNj6V|r$u_0QjN}rr}DfIq+7+67tw+lXg*8Zx$ zC+Z#NER2ZC5_@ueNxvEa#18yp(9#<=I3R9y^rBsz!;9I#4(1KPb`cX4|;c zV|^R*Vvo~D;+j_Erw79)BI$yy6ziX5s3Mjggx*FM^6?&3!mFy2BmRZl9A-uYvNwE#5FkX|IRms9|VLEI@e^bzyPd=e|U~#nR;AIz4^_al$MAY zqXTnW2f`w)*1;&)y^x;V;69dm`I0S}(_#l!X5TA~g-XIKg}yia*divOYqkq{BpP{T zXAEM)EZ^Zu;^o-@DiO$IY*v3Jo=x=9C&VN;?QyZhZpf}kRDc8bl&g03Pu`1?eR=W@ ziIl`WyT>Ta>JME_V}$zu6XMu{_5tTqNP2A2Da+Nx;aP)JJSicQsu{r8YO~++wR}H+ zuK(>VR!3tsWa(7wh8U(pF-qxJmY6x=LzS;1U69g+C{oS?gz3IdL`R{4}#8m^za{Z|4RS|y0%OGoqY4nC#qy}okd50zvxr(D=0iNkz#NK^Bs@9vCpJmRT_iIE0Z)JVs|4rVxU)Km5n(TX8Vsh4} zMBEc5aB*AXPVL5d6)Xl$%eik~oEs@S{Oh>+znb(LNrnzGJyde~N8`oApSX>dc zLF>JZ=pK^3+y!oW-jcmfXj@l%-oFuhBfDGOe}8TycR$AT z??eHb>^{$J)vc)dPu2E^?4pgEl7cr#u@KvxpB-Coge5;%`YqR=cMYzB^54R_OM=gZ z?{}*2Wt)NCpYnRb1^?myWezDt1+&}v_9lH!TB65_FCMS&7MuCH&ntWJGp1!~KzH0= z4QU0$E?3U}Q|1l0|HKhaURUnJu1^tOn6@xnzG1%2Wm^9XcArKKe~^*_`6b#ykO7z#2bqw9-TlOmvU%uff-5Z5Ln44nFo^5* zvSdw+K1n_ol>GSZM8&{RWI1zpy?<^L^s5A_q!G>nDN@7lsnDT$#Dm>F<+`poR^3UU z;c9?H5m+6Eh%_cE#d#6O@brko8QYlbS(TYrov8yW=0vcRqZzEoJz?==dsFG(3ji-g zOhH)95(*1X8h_>#=nfNe#W*ZaA(_(0nC~PS!(5~F^AFc{Y-oUPic^v@`LhuJ$;?ZmlNkm!K^X0>b=%^&xT;JdW)tV%ro*GS=G zU-$Sn2i2fe^p_zR4l8O{f|=z-;x~5W!zTd*X8fz2=a(Mkr}py&kpBE*c! zcl)RP2m~NjMR=WLj=**L0yFeE zd5@pE#rNzNWzroUJ_@Jn2F% z{tFJ88NDgpj4X`5gbKF^GnTkt(=*)f@%&z_3}q$8WX3@7Q5;?$1gu3D$<6X9f*~u! zdGxEu<=c*U1dw$-w7>Rwq&Z<25*xmey?k`+_;|+qyk3C1Ze;3Xn&WM(UkhAjM)7Pmq(AI})Kik-nR1@k;1cz4k30az5ojFQ>s%OXZbVsWb-LvzN;Q9gxmW^vA^<|!>Gh9)JR1s67X z4ViBzo0%312W57fFChcdBXx4|tQL5Jk?k(|wtSRV%qpga1Qg7&j_=SfKrPB3jm!fQXg2%DC1D$yDpk?xz(a~*Hc6mfTcR48{59_Vs3zUWuzdI z{Y6CGi*8)oRJz7XQ`w+(P*4_Pt5Su_2~iJp3QiyDx_Hu5@&l)hnB;-josI;-VAZb( z?z_0X(al(p2Ur3^<6+c$gng1Yx%`B&QMh~z(p_Z97{`j<8tI1ZwcFZ)Uo`;v+6jVj zZvu90Kuvlf#Z!z?6#`87MS@kGVY`eWM(I(|!Ml6 z#0(ZuKx)_KD&yQduwUNgDxhMxVDw!2nrILAuvEq7_aFU|4Q!85cl;zU)wgS(_n<=Rl3@Yn9{ie@6M!S$}1)=+d%s##d==K)>>8HwvlJUU0u~^tw@xe zOV(voDdDE}%3^POxr~-XF0g6NY_bA(S;5h!tF?YfeHmJ&dYzr>NYUT^{^Mco6h^2Q zFoWVCI)CsuG1+?e?uJ;Mil2#J<1&1?fWyg{TJJ=t<;(lwI@dU2yxo8T_>GO&rK8c0 z=N?8rJVJ&OtxvCVfh^rIsYPq1-+!`Avu8<5qN5Il)#d<)PXdm$O1(LfOCi=+WixSK z!bM+>YQ?koR<;NH-F>9bf2Hqa=#kYOx8kPNeo;=b8g8s4r<}e5msBV;A$M<^wGcm$j!RY5*z&T%xxaCqN<1RCe6YlyZa3-oTxwr{Nc9X zIVeHU=Lm~OZn69-4d^RP{1Bz z!-&<&J%oSNbZ5V-xPkPK;&dD5Q*&=K<>(YX+;fWVSP7wr{2%W>qn$w-rYrZlP+$`W zpDk=SZ;owXghv?Fexu$VJ~+H?)m~P-Px%y}P|w}cy}I3Je6X1L^RiDBY<&9`tqIEe z4}<^Z|LLkLxk+#!AaTn7FaPTT{a+{X5CsD;oVaNP!i*Gh`-w*Uii7@V;(#W2p>jn; zlhAN#ro$gEMQ)|qez%P#%r0MD_BLT^N^lpCCC3kEdgV--JM+N^(1-o!+{sjv+F;7S zD>h3RC^OIvL$ycvU~zoAO&Z1=v>wZj+EPV7M2TD^j&2_4SudDl1LhPy$m5xIo+}ri zxg$*$aUl^oZ+J%pM>YA%@&Sngx2g(oIahEMo?oIWfECtXM)BpPO3Bw0p9JHXDtOLw z=AoS*=I1-D5k+=?9?ABOy>w?QM_p>EwJ}ovVjSCP_%-FXW6=7*c=MXD*4S(HMs#(+ zFL$ELTiL%gcgJ7&5lUqI-*up8@6zc1_Z(aNcP0N%)uRiPn2AOL$dt9)WI_sg;LS`f!7ntb$mD%71`>zTTBSp z9&x1eMoRRnWAQ?JUb-JLIy|YN-gmN&S>wWGhJ8<)rD`UpJ^jXC|0(DAo`xMY&%7)< zN@TxIIosUw__k%L&5Wc736B)tgvh3q6Kpu1wofVH%HM7r5r36c-*87#M$PF!v4}*y zgWGrtuAQ8>=KA-xoL-Tz`dsl$k+*A#7+>!wbJ%BHvcLC+)ctnp$x>;#{&pYNOf)#S z=k7C~PS*3B!Z+V6*u3|(*yZ|2_4&EaTAsT)JkMI6x9eGF<+U5T#h!iKQL=sS((1Rm zd#~TS^!u%D?S*@n+TZH_-L!XU|E-W+u?%zn2Tk~%#5HS~g!0cNI`#Yi+O-=^pBFa! z%-;2W`9G%EUASYQoA4{LqV6=ikS;CeUXkb$uXtLC)ISH=cY+;-I4 z+tC<(rlszF z)xXiY=!;R>KP%ZMn{p!lI)1yeFwE-d`qz9qr)OT3Psv~Kf09OhY^u)bH6Y%S|7$er z=kgUrK3n@w;k(V>?cqmlN3%;m@pem# znd{_5+}W@rvGDMt(i@F!N8{U%{%$+U+kO4j6BNm|qpvqG^LFp&>*kLt3jS_VljpSd z?4IswsSdM+*V687v*mq1DBA&NNT!f6N|w!|{7PkCuUlBTKZyR~wGc zeeIRAHr)HTVV>HX2kgsZBjSb4Eac2?@NfS9FLU-EaOWZV+FcbnW(EdHbF^%J3<7}zQnKq?0r7*80CECy|3?r-Q9c_3LwSBtihfFda%paAUWr~sZVtK~$nAPm?EycS zrr#}Lk^?*UAJDnXSAH^0mnmgZQUuwHTp{qI*lY2JX?lDqlMGlHazQ18qRfGbdHS4E zCV8+jJ$h%-u=q;+lBnHi#;^Yco8UWyN?EJ!Vmh4_pW=wSv19w1}@ LhS*0AAi)3tsvV6m diff --git a/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_5—Problematiques_des_tensions_des_co-viabilites_et_des_regulations_archicratiques-version_officielle.docx b/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_5—Problematiques_des_tensions_des_co-viabilites_et_des_regulations_archicratiques-version_officielle.docx index da7d1c128711ce8b6b3181f7bfce2d9f73bc556e..c0faf0c50ccab76e314deb383dc61e5059c22378 100644 GIT binary patch delta 117040 zcmZ^KV{l+m(`J&1Ik9bLVsm0ml8J5Gyul=y*tTukwr$(i&iihCwOd=Yx9Z&LANTxu zp6+w{>Fzu7`28Un3gMUZH*ho%XlQ7VHQA&X1QH-ZaZIj{>3jPfddyYG9hI^Xc?ozi zB@HnZm_5rQI~!S~aT~&iXL`OQ+FuVlqjT1W z+sT?-&&X+ZnKIvY#-rk#lViz<_3smRbguxOK4KfEnHtJ%1H>Tnobt9E!A}WJEd}+< z_1>_E$E2tZBPr*i^5Pm=*ZT+%A4fX^Ob0{phaXQ}F}cy>iVhi>5v(}(32f)0Pfwx6 zjNCnymUW(AASS^v6x#;0RuCc{@L%skySTrkp`c07RrHKOK|t2PKtTS72Z;X?5!VDt z3j7Zb3jGcCyR0SJT$ME6cR|2ruA7xB>&*R8)@l*_yN0YqN3gS8Ok7N@7&W~kMDAf0 zA2gKh6Z7rCrA`Y~-)MX)ZB57`(=kht15|zuY;EtNcj-l`;8u4+VM0J1ls4aO(jhz4 z1}HR>4bxCnH0E7{uJX-VuSqupi?@d02gq`BC_PC~3xX^xrhU)*&F}YLY}WO>>r)-` zTNKasDt%^8gg${=4?J*4Ls);tz$w-J8LtAp zmfNkD&Wg&`90+7R8h6OAi1-YQ$@xh9t3gl+Tsd25(3v4k1J+yDPc%1Ml^N3>6dAN2dRz4p((t zv5O7s#UB|*-qhQZ1gX(Jsw6Y~RPcZn*aMjy+Y|T?_)DKcg&P0BSNy-g|1b7hApiS` z)A%;=?O#yT(SQ?x{@0L(VEnI|OAhb=^9@!+R47hs=#aFv zR?DBLsx@tjnVIDU8W1Q+8@tb6A1iW+XYxvr;!fowgBIK&zkS&YWY$E=b)MGFJkhIt zC$h=HYAj+FJe(V>Fv3Z62K=h@+-Lerzn5U>51aczx(TCeWQ~nre26qF*ww zjOQ>IBaO%ve&`L|c3`fKUnKa-h>{O%EQsx1A(v(9%^oSs{^8$I z1O+`lD7mHZkCmDKA1nXm2L0bVDVPEr3y4}}`W|%kfu4A!jao}2_y-*#mq6vzukoqJ z9)+pDEkoo_EC`k)VqdKzvn2$QC_X9JqF&@9F-LG*cT z>3I*H)KG|=2zG$P%K%cKoS#l#-;n~_VP}+%sJErz!2i2Q2JX1F0`tM+tgv+TBruOH z$=c4XPCe|#nu-FWwZpCRCFd1Wm|klwltr%8h%zJN>s*qSo&-q>F?;Yl5a8x4=|H*6 z)tiq0`h5tIxg z$#~JZU3_gT(-Z>FON^+04OOr~`6-OhPZ&mPrE7&^&EVDRFS6ZvvC?6&0tSueFr5N< zd{lQXWNZM2BzK5(<)%4$Q@>=LLZ@}DxgGK2BiVA^jcBUyHJOW?t=l;_hVf}P(d zNUUbz*%##le}d$bgIX%HfCaGAl44VZg1!Fn#)Lh39zF1N^zH&jTCtRP&wq|NbxQdk zuiF1o_9g!3Q8Up0=b-&>tS2o|ffECoV-9Pa7#mZn)y>JN>YOCT>aiONinS=Jzb`no zYj`?>BqVl|!8t*&hF)?fUH69${TXjSN24W1GEX0SV}0SSx6{MmqMN-w9yPadb${#; zkfYA|7^gr|AUgBarY3i7X=jAX2EhH)+E?^X7$ct(Ly?_C_+>(kuwug4>9#5U5tYy}gQ+xTUtCaNi!)efe=8#s01% zh=6jV!7^ihlCpBE5xGkKB*rgqZ|1fbQMf6Ha?2|tA5z@M*_g-DJtUy4YZp#je^~I? zoa{Jw$Sy)MQluKX2tUX?c!0r!t<_LIU~%^cxU6vhbZCwp{f|LqM^}SQ3HJ{*I)AWq zZCd)sp^vSyWe5+5c%)2eLX&LVJRf;f7hxF{ivr%@;Tr=DOe|i6G1wDWX+L$FdqPS} z2$s+g5~!&|QN#!8F+G47>!FTEm9C`noRBFtXS5QgOO6JfCjs96+-Ee{=?EqwHP5W9liNK`)zefm!S*qy&^zo}5&FlaUo3hfx?IOS)_VauiHi*DyN-+f}OFB2w7)5<+h4<&W>*gIXpyAluiwfU`2`&xm)pJ zMS4)hf4?DG_>+${am(ayO4U>b_uGqd8*7>Jz_Gv ztN6p8o!3m%>#yj4S(F!FuW;6~d6E!gY3q=!uaDamXZ%*l9XMz&3b9b^?4ek~*O;7sDa<7Qgia;cnl4)W}<+Vtjv+pQ#g z%wRV5xQ4$?1Yb1jGlO_b{$>jDE?HhfvAF)*aN7WqtV~_N@OTSdFxcPxKD2irwmq-7YGib(9XhgZ+rR zI@Jas#b$DqLQ)Iu+)gMoztI4CJCm)B=HO2gHz1v3=d`2>%y2a~hz16c74{yB%WF>c zd4ghA;YYt zY$RpRfw;7OA<40!U@?`GoDSal$e` zkqji|up0VhH?AC)F)?Y|e5qR&#P%-P zy~6Q%2>d705So1OxI1|98yo@zKV`wNp*HcPJRH%w8!9b3A@%|X5 zETjdMhT7Of=K6Bv`qdUrakW^D;5LiM!hcMe4oahHre*B)1GwC96caKaju07s#`r5g z$dN}uj}K{Z!>zb#)DD{?7f7V+moV?jrWc+tsfoS2SoL$yOTn|qm#S2gH0WR6Sq{t( zBQbySFjvww_)``wVlbVH@?v2dK>R*QeSQ`kN<}M(n0B=GTZYGZJS^{L7gC-@J$GQA zHR25kyh18~-FAe=wq?br%-Pg)+nPmaP0-6p=acIrYyinfZz7-wqs;KQ}7SK~;?xz@h$Z71Xg*biI^_9KrGUof?dOGb4D$v@nwC#HNiMyyp;%$C;MGdf4217&$ z{1eVl(Dfy!AUgk4117}(gZlqyx&NvL6p$o-MsTR43np+xKz+<+?O&DSi57g*dek8m zQg~m>A7muwnD_%EHJ2{e3!03a64*k2sNU!{zbuUvVk1`;CQMY4NXrJDfa$%hqL7i}`~NXR)+z@AJD_H1{8hqWL=w zv%{rEWXMYz;EWaS`WW%vOnZfMEbz&9KGekALz*ovD4eyCsDkBXxMnt%=gb;iW&Lzr zC1KwH9<|rI;0DCKzI~zhPfi7DD8%%I<;rtN#alU0wD7y=MRnEU@Uvbv$~t>NhX#Ao z@Gj)Ax#gvsm=G`SUgb<=(z#yNTDJAIz{*A76?Gnm;6NfavviTSSId^q-TAP{bjxN)N+`kNTOV3I9|@2%V|4a*2=1fw5>!?vt=Q65*ftMq z$hIpySf=G*K9E0STU;VjwA(IYl&#Fa;|cz%V;sBcpvffV_Ka0NJH~Q>3 z>5dAsTu)#>?wQ_im%9r!v-rV$)1ySE*@id{l;_3dF{=Z|7|78O|K>LYv5qW>(0Ks3r<&kb2#a} zK>KEv;1fSd24G_}jI*^|)#}eWaQ49PhG+MOK(W-aK=jKRz`^d-dZfECA zNg({8Q+nvf#)uq&ZBpg)h;F`83t{BdKEU`4bm89!bfs-MPh7SITW(TM8OAtkV{ufo@?r4QC-AP@w#Ct*R#>u%AEdg}IJoBR zBXE)G&cWX$KyLxFkHb>cfAxHg^KPtBu*G3}1Pmeg-2L0NHFd?<*CZWxS(24@N8S)wB5&XZ)n!>FtpX99Nnksr=)G#_^9fp_1Q=QGljvZdmd)9P;E}0TMP~e zFI8jJ;U~3sm1S$@7K7TWc-9(;M*^4J>pd;l@)7R`KR%Qg5^YSl>z@_o1R6goH4!g< ze028c)}N>h8MfY0tT^~cB)WTWOiXQMrI{}+8DIdd_489#a}7a`Yx!StO`J`4%y;B6 zW1q5)$!oMa!U>nJ*Yi#0)YroMzY4#kblt4emfDVhW$nSkb$%eL^Qe_|fq`$yJ=xXV z{q*R|57Q0%l{8C=AV+?S4oVK=gt}s!X|zH2s`JuC$x#m1Cy7AMLf%^=s!~qXmeM^k z0}uF6&vaUKzG%rf7(5_cDv(aX^Ip0xI!oy8*uykzC4Cm>CCdupzK~$!X^16$I$E z-p@8{=f* zI2sP0;y6;yf~II6p3xA#qP_sr)N4*dW;m#J)0Jkg@p^t#eqV3i7agA9K#nw8+&4Fy zxui)ZxvDEy3V?%7Nu!FN&UK6KgxyYa*;QKu;Hq`NVYlRAHwTTB=C*FYlPo{B17b2r z&uZG7PHsoAc@1O>m=>t^D?=Xb zMD<1U-cLD>HF-|KW<8G|59Sh<)Mc3%PF&Y^qq(|gH3NjBec+^KOFaR0c}Z7Lz^`S6 zmUO(5qoHWz`yuGqPhMhaa6pp}cRvRrQ?>ol%no7~%;Sz6W0kz6_!Qy~#)F%arL zd22AA<25k3wQ=`TW7bpCD5tV7XR|0+(xq~@42=bp)-AdsbMn{glHV2;l$%7Ned_g8 z34eG+^LTx2RMg2r0j^nErIgFh%{@1_S;iuLiAHMOu zVSnF9=YZa)EuYd&CMoWM=Dl0Z6);UglHl!wVmLTRpl9on{h;QtNcT^>sj?>sz z;!+%5`sX3p7Rw{s=RQ?pF)jn94dz<)iP}XcwTgwSn-rs1q>l&fda!ww-O<=Z5nM#y zXJ*k2++Dy3|KFKY%GZW^K%8JMY*1+|1?%AVDD&iqy0Ihh_P6pQk86z`dk1E+v4xJF z{WQ68l4-K73oq%Dv&h<0<|>cSW8V;#}Z+FKbup%o?mGU|}FOn4WsHQ+If5gkW8 z1|F9omr!oWOniHTbH;c$5ILysa&fEj$#79vPaOAFR04b^t+sMS!d8lmJS|Jdzp*Q} z*PaQK61zcux+rTH*!%hv&rK}6nPWY*^ZgL31vj@G7twI;IH>P;ZYn-_E&O5Fb><8g z%27ENKt`C#PO~2HzN~^|!sUbUNyO>3XU{9~9g2~yz&g5|MYyJ( zxuA@nfuQRIR8~Nsh{-a3+2n~LQ0KP7M1OXZzn2StRnp(+rWY9hr1U-tfMk`Si`~=v z8`p_ERIh^w>~W`7oy3TkbP65S?AX2)VufhF9Ir-P2vT7X582RCaZR z^tFz3n{RYSoHK@DxEe{Gf+<>yc!;U3s2+a3R*mfrcqY}EZ;+)FGuR9P?dy+{PxRf# z`sN}Y3yFolMRB`~^jVFercutLDD0fXs(P|CHO_vD0pu zIHt5pTr104nGpUn5sqWAP?T@xT&}iEsj~nZ{35;p!Jtt1F9cjV;*Z5$RaY6AvyJz7 zJPmFP0ObOY%xwVU52-e5vOJ6wGn>*zXo9q-)~1WShTGq{H?c{PDt~hMM4bp<4?Yt( zCPZ@)eOv1(IvqX-LUqI_`QG5LyTA(MEzQ?6S1ycwiX3D4r>xzvefZfSMWe{H6L;+f z`Bu|d7|S}JbVQ!j3D8q7(?ZY)ZN7ooZ>1 z0}KJls~XEH($6&9r(EQ&Kt6ae-oStoy=8~!E-`MG?^Fd@MWaBh4KG(b#TPg-Aa!qq zPpL!VoiaptbOdl$o!hIC!48O(EGw5$1)XBYoOe#Et*`6z1vFgwaP z;;mM@@0isfo6|%R+Ep$WIY6Ew!Wg`qNnxCRM@g3?4ZpUYi!GPNeSG1<*OKJm)~Gfd zH19PwYQo2m)HL$5dA`_-_LtLual3>7nG=dN|6~oI$x4#9-z)6n8ggzG6~fvVug9qW zMPBXpvv2_OsW?;lQpQ)g2EkzsXpX9HKe?75AU)i=`Q`4_pHusb+B>IXB3ON@m~)sV zqIZV5hdE3>OG@Edl%9mqK&1_UQ5gY=$Yl;b|``dFfiLor@sXyem$w4akx|WT6iSCmTO~SA{0b zIrFVrHEh9d0#A|m=kuKdTpyns`YuF0&|OSHo_@@ETd@PChm<6i2?wCrCC9HWMJ1)0Mt zu=cd%)EKDcVuB05wMvB!8fKuf2S}33w4AX^xu!DA67WgIqxEV%694f#!FY2&4pO3h z-ciaRX}@PLy%?I``Abe1X;O=*&4;eQ)JXkg!b~<+99$BID`k2Ea8EbDS2Q3NB)9A4%~K%4@r8dX%c%H3Bz^_Eh04%?|@tgbu3 z4cV@MA=F#ik~1O;i1m2!d;{Y#`K zPFA*`E{C)QUy9bmeY9l_kzr)O9-Jg{(9zUV9I_)8Tf?R$XSe#hWDjACwj+TJ413?N z3-1}%CZh=SQ24rL>6IIcFxg>lk*S*avl{b?e4TLSom-Cp+rel?GKcKOO;cq?#w1?* z5JOTi{@;-3XgEwN$B5KF**c_cXFm%TSihQ*C~m6u?}Kiukoue^1xPxZrTtLWIm@i` zia>pz9|L|Pgy|t68l!lI#a{gu98N`p4wsphqHjwezHOt1mAPf#595P%x~KoRmW^N} z;$>GKco;wcdgAK|kP)|*CbIg2d!Pgm#M|ZQ>I5ID>3!pZR@|cv_DQ&Yg3OWA$?g!D zOQJM%2rRwujVN7E(n1ht&6Sp<-rhI)d&CP8%8QQ<&+^!$AoLANzf%^R8+AJw^Mr-F zczp}PH~HhnZAKK*9dBGY1>-P_ZZ==>AObULY6DsW+@kd8xQ`}ts*}^DkPxwR9>pHI zOl|4v=U211U9#fAJV@%KQBvZc$Fr2jrtuppb_QlbPV6`%8O#4*>%ke(_0n<6>t%Y7 zWyLRmW9cRus(*=uhC_P+GxXp!3%$NLX(V z{^0!%?1MhOuNj+#6*v0h*Kg%h%Ba{d!Z@Y%M(M&ViX!&^2FD=Cs_@@Lmm7apCfQf- z*?dw2Bjqq4Fp+M@@LxpsDtnKDs#)?{Z}C~{g)J&J)!V>8x*#^ohsJtlQvZP|{ucU6 z8_^B?3kKBUIMA~;8h#LKO@YRTBX4xvP4X-P7|?AyH<=)M^mVmol>(AMu9HVF3!r!P#8fRWXe#4uh%EUv+$iLRzpKE4+r5*KukWN!%r z%%#87Ho8F?Q6&SC&BI((xaL(mUufm?27-}`zY`h+qF7n3!eMyXwwJYYxO6pFb@9ya zMu9x+IFWWG96Je{3_PdJ{CqW)_u9+1K`_-k`6U*l=+#VVLQAxy^UQM{q(KdAyVxGQ zr<#Y@2X--BIZtAn1SKOrb#xS4jauD(LhQ0kAPT-?Xlo!~Z**__ z0ZWkJyBIi%{<`8N1L+2cWURPcQvNGVQPwPj6=c-wq?QMC%R7**Se7(;M*Yks!;3{e z5|}*QR!>atKBDf%(y+Ll+E@l7F+HN_UVg;fZ=<-eg}k)QG4XhEv2g3Qx<2lJWgxzo zY0i&R?{S(lC9=PpPN#<7zD`0bH=+5y!{C?=% z2TcB%L-Jo=tKes&;t5t|7BLoMbGQ#(YK4$b-Z4g7sC6;^PF9EI|Nd%?TF3JVTI@mw ziUZ6cmn0j9T?L$=SAt5Ju|k{xzJ&3U!c8S|aFKV88=K`gs2TwEJhQoYyKf~y(3bdu?kKg9T*mEZkwqo5> z{%Z(BxO9v!j^O#(>X3a&81l`3Lk-}RXW@>8NA--D?nBWA_SNM8cqD$9Qu7(+jo)MY z!F{_r3c^<}322r5g4L@iU_wE0!NjNwQL;C@nZ7c`+LU{6xW*%Qq2B$?i=n|7@WT;+ zjWN#cEpw5`#MMkO+KB3(r+q(B3h!>|X!SILd}Ta+UEK2LNTVt=JSivFt&WV?vnKjv zR*okZb;eMhK+Xa{2_nPD?5*u50)PDo!e(1doO-qPqHZSpb=%8{OxqYKWgCxU;?u=; zV5WsMK7L%4bfZKwZ|9C5EYd!P1d0>g<3(t|NNmA2R#ZiH3_+S1n9sfn0Y;uKcA2Yq zHjQY143%pdc9V(n*=jW-Y0=2Q;yx&<>w$A`ZRvJG@0$%!=N_;2bl}|>O5NY=%f>J6 z#d+5-*VgSWqJ5RhK5ekDl55n6T4g47%-nc_lQbxiP6=55Y3KIs*XfkT#J3!am=%~E zTa3-H(HbO^cOY~e?V|`(PpE9QVWSSC9sRmkj50uDDR>%5rL**;!IkF}J8H+9jZGXs z8n%@xlH&)KO$IUUT>hBfPC-K4;ej;HrR@`%H00liwr_qAFeTLz!gO%>K`dl(0J8?xP1E)ndGq~RX@#3#_HuBM?<`ogjP+9l{C?wvkC?I zG`gjUU&&HcLI(95W{wNB%7+kv6`wY|bKVoW}S;@xrl_5{_6OV49FvFbSh84*6_w#E(6G-(xR? z3HdBELUF~@9=j&SOfEEQQ0KP#*m76#k```OHKtzQETzVn>r#*^N(`i1uRpz~*_~I}7zp>K zTxj(wG|-A^LEKpjEr5k#K#q2HTWKeER1pL$=e-;#Mcm?pqrl@On!rc2)xd*N1}^)U zr3KPr)AdNN+MWs@Mf7(YB9Qh1Rh)Hqt@CuV?JVHQH!j(nNmBFEGMrX7v~_)iy&{Pb(5LK=L*6)-x~uL_f}1N zHp~RABU9m8gVy@)h@}WCx$l3+?cz5@tXC2qJU#_tyD}V9BtX<-LT{zvE~TMgFW)}j zOj>-X5|KCen~iX%rt^?{^`$vyZ%d~+DM{oi2;khA zIDTeq@dEiyrxLoqSHJW1wx;+WfIh4d7SCljWwO)>Gc}4y*_y$9%=k5&U&gmh&1Iph zX~Ng_Lo%Ojb#nAR^b8x%5o;%#zT7laPY_l^`9>GuDlPt6&P%fHgAaE}=7_ z8%qT*At+paGwad^uj2d1fWWQ>L1j#2!l`&lMDR6uXcPBD{rID z_h04TH?DS4paCt{Lyr)I$=>JJ_}#F7S4k!b1?99rsFTztEVtRG`-R)0v~sU*6>$Ea^#snG#sug&(Z!_jM2Wpb-# zYGn!r#9dvrh{FQltjmgcu}NopgyZ8XJ%R9EiT={MPn8s(np@avU{^qT^SjPdt93Zt zEc59AgP9qMm_oVc&&CIw4l`c~G+kGttkJe~F^r z5Z=?wfUk7rmnb9o4;uUR&7{)AN>~wp84(|A}ymQJ3t}=0H^Xg!C z)3+8I|6wr1TbDWXDd(??UY__YvvyRW4%uLSME20nGo2BsR_Ls+lk0p6H1W3M^(F@M zXNRUvpfE8aI+0l+>N3Q0=GBQ9=f6DtY~tY6 zBdEp5rV(fWBm-?6uH*aWo>d=VTpA55iK#BeEA~3|Ir|gMx^2agW7AQPgDf2jg$|yj z8`DWGyebj#45luElZt#9gCq%`=<*%UvlOf4D@Fp|SUO$^o)! zY_Ua;gC<6luQF(EpEk1|>UeQk{vH>%HQ7Q)@oExan0Y_*r1oLuori}`h3}D|_ThJH zEU8B+`IULg_VGIW#=|1Gzb|-KQeu8;3tZ{4xV9lUTz-r%SG$cT?YZ}jN-?a!Y#y>tY^J^y!P(nmRZ0ygYB+rwmkYbOU&95-;-pep zVi`a1?9opIXAAN&nH&)n#)Jl*IemrMBq53KQJolDT8v$iMn+pKe^fRE2>&Gh6O6Nw zlUZ5iXeEDwk!HNw?~-8L^#E}y^U8Sh*89DdaF5W4>Bj23xS!%(s!Uw5kyvr$LLCmO z-h2#=aZVH?degwhS3*~n$YzrI!?7va!u}I@|E7_i^?^k{8D-OXMex`>{uy>M=Ro_p z`(PS4YZ89i?+3GFgIy-ByHH``*8h-TjW>lOw zI^4UfhfXwa;AeD~Yo=G5wz$n`FCI-m(S6=tXnz8T z3^e^!2rT^VO1z76zBFy=v|jsH`>h|*|Kg< zpKBKM$MdV2FQZw@ULaxD`B*pgIC>crL4gXg@?`N33?slWYGu%iBwv0j))IHuSwm61 z)TWDhDlO4g;Y!nJzi2=4TNy#hy6y!~@{8#rl(ot}xlk^3D28@?kcsMqfe@6HML3ki zz}kO7y986QmnhHd&nnRF*MUFL^hZ-^u1eakn$4Y89epYsVh8WaohW?Yj{*Cecl?{k z+xHc8`;GR5(z8QD1fssJm!$1wBd}9qRORkf!T7E#t(FMs@-AJ@P>Q8BqDKpG9Vs-N zbS+R65n3e~(v;!(WoCIu-Fu{yJitSKG^FPyq}~<$(?65&r-2}QJnWVv!e3bzofT`( zWcXTgMY$SXwPyPq#>Bz|S$tz)o-vI_vspUb-wZ53BNe(lYDB}-)cXMxx9XfS2ODnx zSN#~YJ>im_d2($Bds#1mq=P@;WQ6t|#8ja;xr1iNU)EI_EF8S{`Y*MxEnAj`XjPL0 zW(qcp7H5HWEV{Zlm!y1RGO5hCzYm3uvSfVfITToUJvVh0|4x@E9DxAF+Rf>*lSS}8 zc|NLhwGT4j?e&Oc=CX0a6e3((q))}uRQn=)4&^Q#^+_izRv^e3v}p>&Ma6NU4>%^n z4GWL>Shj!KC*B60jukR0z%3Cgpsl(fjeX0Z3_X>ouyha_t=x`nw!&eccXO&K`dNwm z0WF9uq@Y5Ru51RIqEeK9Y_IepE)AXfkl1IOfz$frKop5~J=d7!6gV&tBR73sE-4Sd zBAi&*Po3lRz1&NndOOYlJZx>?ZpJv_aEzAZooRSqJ5^B zekn7CUNsn`x7gFLzoa4)Nb*uAzd$zf=TFNpQTD-09Gl`BMT!#JMyIa)#^Ri#omFBP z^v|a`Krg!fCkZWJmVC<3$Mub0rFA-I%I7i{`P1rmPpl-(Oho%}^DS-9g6};{E~29v zi((Pzw__T^qJ9Fx2g*2xD$H|sBo)F=waq44NG;!_M>f9`S@}a(Hi{+puK&EbKi5#> zIw>DqyCUFG_rTE8MpxYoADZP@>7B*dEId}b$yET6@^RXdsg}q+LDb$Wn39u@uB}JV z&OJd`GW%N=Y1fr2^fJ%g)|oi4kXf)T)=-LUfJFr2h(yf6%y)&?Oa^QZw(Q_c ze8<}9uG~&S>VQ>TV5qv96t=NSMyzOlsT&d%!YjzV3skUKoBsfoT(@k0*} z&ji|bvslLNkU5QBsUf|cTW4n$ZXUnJr>jXHzE`*a;3={n%4jDG7Fg88WSJ2t%y+H~ zVzPH^{RENxbNY4Mr!9lMSxO{MBIVktSy0n{IIloWl#z77c>)Z*5s@YzDH<$>`a~lX zZOlg$?)pkERg_n?XIM0gd;eQ+{xUfB-?}|36r;L8$WXXvyzdNE^N^dXvxmRwK(zcg zDfT$Pgqx$cR7YDBFg3+3+#ZIw;}d>s7hPxM^wHPg@LhORV{x5(Yjt z0BH&=g-fLH6SPV_bkLK@}a`Zw(c1<6EN+mMc*b~%@ogn0=6AUbFg z6xy3cef&r|(NZ%qnV*p2lZ8?SSHL%9Qs4TU9i>#UM+8n<)h+0|HBggz52aE9`W@nO z@vr5N!X1jb>}2(Z!g z!&MVG`8iFw3fmdnrw6Hj*VwZ=v!94Eq?YFC+xzCG`XB){N$#fy+EGHJ)Atp-goJxa zv#L%@l6OlO#Zou_UuR|`n^Bz-JU3QF9#EN5NO<(v1rO+YY31k%1T(w_8>U#z{!&(e z8;UWZJN>?R@$-t@U;kl3Zf|a>InX9p;~nS)oCe5a<9sXUjqogU8M*(!D0*s=Va8z-IF8r zPr);bm+H)PHznl!)ZUkR*WWI89t1XHKRH+|d~&3BZZg-wBXGHQl(*DHy@sLkI3q;` zYYAud@i0VD5?DtZZL0{3m5Bxc^Hk9hAcAh(P)%PF>xiw-L4b=?vPxX z;78;*3^XT|lOLItY=}Q%NaNUoZyZsC)i0CLZ6_}LYBkrl&jiwIFh!SC7WFRbzaX9L zWkC?njx4qCrebZ2KqB*;{;o6p58Y$IN@( zq7vfWl_pIr4DN|r%^#$kG#v?fVTEagJ)xu~gc7GS3J~oFiYlsf5}iWO*g2Hh5iO5_ zv;`l%9>xI6Dp?sCmPc%@%y4PLX#%3>>_3(_dSQ~e%6yjfMNw0eG zLFWASiuO|FCi!^)%6?9c_rYF#c^UP+>PjGyiS_If-}sM!2wV87rgWOc3<{-g zaR}M5Tie7D?kH*3LOr~qy_Ry!(8k#XgVqjlxq`Adp^UP0yq~y{`@b_UWHR-O*nfA! z8676b-44%+Ppid~l;#_ki%@~bu2tdSJecJ5E*JBLrl5}G6|B|(cxi$H5pjir%bRJ~ zbfd5AoM8LZ@L91EyGX>0)^t`&$vualH=_F>>|M}n^7DM6JVMqTc`jP<+*G?(bNksU zkXu*lo?R0I0i)gY`QU_G35=;zv|Rf3cX~I zw?zss*0iBef*33T`mCl8!C-Lqn^hP@%;L`4lP1nm9O4lL3D->C5hlRM_)3}ChZk;W2-H?T`OHORW}Q|IkJepQSUyT!UKGbOdbaz zG=!q;&k}p$@N{O5moph0zTq%`=&VcJhVhLRhh^s|`etkZ#aA^jy;hEm#Bz3}%WQ~P z!>idiaZ*E}m!hL;jLziGLR)rv#M`z=YRs>yLjeVZHTtum2!-WV8@6R2Vd#;-bpoTkHRQ z1?~T_2&=y~K;xGUn$ATmqWT5`H=4ntvv`l_H1d>JYw9PgU>3WT`J+Lm1^4SQYE{7B zM39lc#_FeMdts09;=KO1JokUCbMon_S-<%ikinok;KaIiFt_XaBZQwONIB(k5T<_1 z@Kc;GGw+vK!x((

plo-?)0qaEi4P)lu2T#V{zoN+*V2#l!76NMz+XmIv9tRYJ0L zLmC^6ftdPbSKe9u3HUI)M1Ym%|B4au1qn2rB$O6%Q_sQv#M#geo_7(${vHl zErKt;q)luvUb6;TdpIhjsxqOPg7R><40Q9-=#3qYFel<;j zaDOA?hXlI4HWZ_;;d2O!9nZCcJ3?7)A7{;HKiXFi_&qLM4?iX=J5@Kl&5 z-N_RDW!}bg6`a9>;b>6o54RiU9VA!Vsf};Kv${Sc6&)m_|0Wlo@Ac+x#1vExOqeGh z|IL3!Ao^;&l5Af`zRrzE6EefMTSl}n=E|WtPTsM7r!T_@Xeue?_m{d}y_c~}w`nUk zl((+!o|oZxxKbM#H(OJ1hrWpzx)L6zYPr}=w^FGG`89a;WYb5VX1@@oH0~O8fOltk zdqsH1{^gIY7x%A){MXShOlEz3c!!A_6lg#j$%!z%=ZC^|{x=_ZVYo=7Fg!DwADhcd z!O_!VBQHYf4Wo3h*Kek(w5qw%&&Q@^T=nlCJxSb;-BxTY{0N%;aVi)MPrh_6jgER@ z#+M!{*bfx_K(8KW)9pDs38P-k9@3?dv5(w3hsWwY=I@&^$g1W)L?ya|pp)8nMF6(s z+CxJe3)3aa+8SRmv-+})841wgh4ljR`}IbZbLnS-^X8o(BKt5s%#tg`rlr~|#|7%Cy4|=eq z!*6}7^^8G1=3lX|mQ(qW2@8??$_&*ACTSKyYn^$Q@s>q4=g_dsX(8e!ehtvrb%#uG z2V;M0(l&~vWF}(n?9HG^Fw0>VRA~J+E+iA$BLiv&4{2smKp>}RtkPY_`fBD7Di_-I z1ztbC7kbo%_Ja(Wm!-hu>TX0tp`)D59SKOLf`~6dm=T^*N7Kb&CX92q;2dJ2n*OOZGLw~?F?jpCXEhc} zEvYD&A(nTxgsKQGMJ>(Ccv%cB;RXINkkUdLE$?qolV(X)H1NpNR!|+A5U70oUjQ*c z&cCblJL1GQn}doSkz?oAyDwMzZffqTbtiJ)P_MvAibMnS0rXcWTPD+eM>Fw*pKY_e@g-4MrWc%S2aX!7HuR?ZaSr}gN;~N6{urG{(AS@ zk&_5I9xY7~wsq3Gog|nLfASRoN4}pv zokFtM1EP;;L7Ft*pYj|9Ys=I|7KLwnt9N2+KQ6O07^b_>zJZB3$DTzdDWBsKs)jp{ z=olSUH8%w$S(~kZJTZ)0tc~MTx#hg>Bv;rz>UA(thUV>|TP8~^QApLf-+`EYU;I5I z!dfX>*oJEGuZA({SE#O}e@qsYS$;Bx!$o--c8cYMGBk$loQ(ynG9Reo+Kf3QWnvhl zJ9s+6teY1o`hDwKN_b)E->W`SmSL42oqk;l!e?tPUMx&H6@r zb?C+|*&Y>d6~Y*t$~)UHv;%sy>YOV%TPbuPwA)!SSQH0xuE?2Xf8M#vf>#W9ZAc|Y zn@!o+YmEzTW6aTRiG)|07J~UlGnG|lJ^+$yDUuMmC^-$p>T~HJ@)FYhns#oa@na`h zuZzYB>#QoLHiW?KfijUoD*CaIuf;;sXO!&ZT=S6LU7=PR1Il}*nUhf2b|^wo=e>OSylEZcoKD zoa|hux#*-;P&b&;q_F7upGCbpw}<%#SZ6Y!M%V99IHCGp=Ti<@;w< zs%m++Q9j!@HcPkIoXV@U2;Fy;_qzF3eY2cQ5+;7GJpows_`ynaA=Xk$5!zAsqVH!=zA8JYR&^POwYqtg=IFxmV4O_jvco!I zNYkBM7vIPb;vLrKJ@(q<_?FGxphLGT4Ew0h>u>p&@&a)Fk4sQwWcUnDmL{cy$v7fX z0@3vt3K7?zve2wTV@E?@sVAnIlfsY{`HWNg-L)M}f8;^NuJI2wN6=ltxguYzQ;I>S zjsKw2=ot8_7g#Xb51?>}8(GXA$F&u^7 zL(275=aX%Y0!6wYIs0i?9A!ifR!kNwUyiN)inWa_W-hgm*&=z$h^*D8Z@vs-xJf;?h*T9u7&o;3<3oQx~|KT?iVT~T#Sb-C6s6O84VC>CiFy>$(4|@ZymC|t> zPs&JE40Au*#cku-?HVsC-Y!pz+0elBl#$_be+C|FYIVr2M(;;Z^>7WZlJ8x_!>~hZ z_!c%z-dx6Eq|aTac0?6M(_=7cV(_k3%p%bNAH}c-f1m!ZfBe^fv4Zg}DqbF>TZ{lBxwFq2BVL9s znzDj0YLy2Px*!kRv$5o?T6R`>It&I2tDJA_r7Hpit1&BNo}-uG$TK-5XH8S47WAy7 zXA@NA0f3$Wd5_-QdR}J1pbkeTDLni&C20)XZdS4PW>hqbdExIvH75!eNbT7Je}CiO zv5xMjcZ1L#S=8&94CNbW42&*8Qr$u%+t(s>nJP@8yM|40KbpHL!6VmaGB zZW-G7iIzh>OAanqS(=ZO_bzIbRWgnq1@8FLP{UL|fDT%N)7O0Wq6?#$Jq3*I?pxts zXx81=G{{^t_DG_6!G@PhhQrQDe<1=n+kx+Vz1nd@$=i6Uud>ZiXi*IY?@CfV5f$K` zjHzO!tjVWUaq@d92XYKL)J%SLGIiT{NYb$G3BLCMwgx}9)-Pj)>F{L(`5Gl)3&2j` zSi>OJ1vhe_WW)5uB<6IW51}7Yi#N)YxgmF8gRcD&t3Q`S>tuaswRT_#e}e5@QPf`3 zj)z>hwf2^C<8@sL>P_k`w|feKxmCjmQcJ^pPkZ^;RMK&cY6?Vn?=Pm-rXTE=<4KY* zGl8|mxLGo~AeO3C4KqotyS7NRot!W$g`rg-xLotVPD5od?cNcOhB%|)T=&p?;&TTk z^B881YvBTpW$RO9P_IZ3f8L82*~uoMkLv9*SgH=%>63Q7)c8bhAT zyE@cFDo}J_iwr9m3@%f!uH(>I?2kYYLc7OD zxh70#r?ZK!h)Lx&qPP*Om<`2{X6;_ADCjn~6q0%(ezaBkj%e1{e~@+D(*%2321K@% zcYo(;8JS&-G_8bAsuDP7hvUC-A z)|@G;xmyucS@RB8f2v@YADd`!Ao!?P5axyKcU<9f*4Q$ukdiJU&mX_u2tM|O1T$(4 zE`B6d^tn3u9BrD~n8dIDct)9`HoW*OM%;hrP8wa@Y z-DqV-S6yxox&gYwSmr4y;escVjKm+aivGE0havNo7vuDCf0*vTWFliwIVxs#lu0Q@ z@bg$#GPHI@X^Fx8ieOqSW2n6=ES<*P&5HSn^1o?GvN7BW-|+ty0U52d0^v|LvH>vPZB z&hb>Sxf--)cBiyHX2jYkR>*Y%eY6B=tro;?=kf}i_+hCOZzJSbt29KgKouwn!9<~s zFV()ax{g;d5WcfaKZe6@xsL<^kF9YDbL3tM8Qzy)e{iU!Hie{}9UHCU+rB9$lPozl zT1`t2apD8c?=BdX!#a20WEQ>hjYz{7Hx!;*(;4!lBk%2)a)YgpmZM6FB(GBxNiq_v zrz9^9h$+AmeRV|TG*I)OJvJlT5X4yfv%;yBA=knCm$H;or|-R}T)Rw09Q~<$$T>_W z%NM+l#0Ro+fcCOSaZ^l|bG(T0;JYv~V?Z=Du<&Z2FHJdn0_Y_m+V*jOY+z=1Ys ze98F_w)N3!ys8W>vp-P;PG)z%n2yg+FxtXfj;{4+EZaCdr>G=oKXRDDux^PjtcZE) zw4~8%#+Lb-rFZ3_M4J=Gimi8V9X7Ac$=2qwqmm7;@MwQdLKa8ZRhW-FO#OgHzKzT>peHi6THbn4PI_AOZL;&u2a)2F8L3@kEO~IEt4TS(hX7@4k<|nh(>@30 zm7(~6vfSa$Qy9P05=UNTlx`huV_vS{e;OrVZlo720hkgIq#5 zs))s>*aHE7f7(6N|{!=AaZ+f0B*D zn@>TiSHt(#h~dt;F}a*SJL=NqD-}XkJMwW=tS{Cn*g#*XR0tYZ787*hn$B5s6n&+W zW5bhdnt@!11V*0C-;5suW*ZJiXB_RJBpO^h36T52s=S85r;8q8ITiz zRuw>H>O>Vwl_-qL>)JGfEEnZN;krz*1{f$=V5vz9cqw zkAqaMMTBu~ri?5Wva(*Kf6-~bNB$*BGV{O7R&1RmgL!USD7`nOhk?pcBgEd ztn)8>lPkm`1y4jelqUh2*zEB*)^T1ZgktT?NftZJZdGl_!If-!t7;UmGhkFeW2?do z`;`Z^;H5N>RD#MAcaX2cUsgr}(Z9S57tc-9$gl_#GyGi`D4_yle=~a^avrG3rsM^-VNXyLky+eMGHHn9`ku>WvEzx(!vOt$ini+sRbIi(lW8yR&1a&Z{*E+WcL& zo4?CN2t&+PMcwq{e{(&W#)VS7dHY4CY{UW;TV>g5f(A)fZ?HBzNq_IQ*e|6cOlD$B z+G-ME4?jvxf4z7Vf6*`!XaJL4q5kJks1$C?6Uss#rh}b9Ye|i0mXtUO5k>~Rd4iAO zd25=WiA%VwB3PF|7T;qdh8eFaL2uYCI||U|Ltg_B)wS^Ke;2t|v1q{#6k}+P0=3pF z@&c1awavyJZ{*@9L{?N(HMdv`H7JKE%`p-#5ac4*?Xv)G|c&XG&7g?x3Z z#uijZLrlD?e}onRvNoF-DJpW>jzKG~kem|{Iq9{mKBya4l`v}|_-=`4)+O8ma<0zl z>hP)w=Nih%n6@7OTK|rmAsU50s%(!*F5Z=IbA&P zfA5Vl6H}_9Vp~GS3Su^#k*i$*FH@7lSiHMhtSknZj)9~dR_;xAy%z?N!}NzxdTTt5 z!h~Rjs-K>}*P$FNxmP8#fQ>v>B}*|#O8Q+i;zPMa9*C+!BhG$Me@>dNP1-fR^OsM~ zWFj4H4uZ;QzCqEX7`~d#GSikK2q;Y-e`6jdnTOD=;InbUpo&IyrIYhKk%ykMdrHhK zx{c*ObdLFU=qbQ4@AP41KaXAAPH;KAJZU)S0&fPoG{u-3o8NNxruAadX{o>xm_L`S ze4=6)`xe3jiwA$m+ALK4&_>!S;qO}yijnplMp)|TkYl2lsW4aX3eWC6O&@#Nib%U(ek)6c(!_#>3H?WT$V94m^|saVzeK%p>x2Qg~}Bf6w&~t;FZrScE}2JR!3(up8hfm zhmlvnUGo!AWF-AiPIs9YZe|*VfkqTDP#|eVZ!LKYc9kYjnr_kSqcS5Ke^6LH6s7do zSfSm?{)u#Q+dPQ(rDT46XEq0+(kR0e!(we_Jrl>(kJj_-U@LRCuH<}{UwO^tFg%f! zUbLZt1JbGXP$3v%G)Ha!lhaFL@}yKlp96`(!REdEr~0*n<{N4NXsyEJ5&A(pqU116 zdGcKDK=V?I;Xg_pD{eLle~=H}d>u^_gufoBX(Pa7?$?g+An+3hfUI}KK01Lu1vx3X zj+psH=_M9{Q|$T$}MMr>~zMp@~KwyKmzpA#87WSI7J5;e}+9ev>Ip}I#5XZ zC&nxzR!#s3V}gA6ZI%-*Sp%wT;1y<;C-Q{pCO190;b+l>4ETl$fS$|#>pxq1EVG(- zzuHM_tr0;+#C+0rjCiUiTGdBBNM>&@Z2eX8c}Va~ct$A}HojOz21(?BnaU!s=%A-E zlQaL3UupE^{Rb2pf7Iq`;IcV)ccZVg4p;!m%iB3FIjhLRk%e3q6>Dwc=-6oKY3&B6 zTEpwEGR^~A^onT;xfVo$V^YiHJxw;LrliL)gY?PL+95S8I+2e2mUgsI)fCJ?z~`KC1Bjg%S(z6+6{S7aryI;VJLm=41Qe}_^`Z)bPHBC&kaV@;IV zXB_ay>>RENC?HC=;c^HTP3Zn9Yvw>&Wm04*lvZCv(C?mq#OC%;tBYEsjj2F4S>h;{ zj_kd=MuQa$qbt8b0)wuA{c&IHhn3QnK^D^TGG(f+Xnu(GP-Oushle8A*IjYVdbEbq zoM0WB4`z>@e}AcEi89PJN@K37ROu^21|PJd;L2;nvEipSs(1ZkWX8phLk^*6JlelC zhKGFjl|DD!f(huyGZl=SP5rWQJ+=^e!ph`XzsPfi)HxJ0U34UrOGbh$I#ze09G%2v z!-;9oD?UPJ8EZ3nRWFoBjUBk{73Zs(z2JwfI5%|0DK7WTno(@A5FzI zd@!;o*U$Pz+r%jjL4(Vkij5Lm+|fI=*IbFUWbHW-!$VGf0~=hrjIksyDy&pkwR#OTM%C!A(q0|MLDXgfu&Y- zb0Dgm;(y+*Vx&f3qc^ zYoqVMx(*^alUhqsW;UX1o-Q_--hk>gtT&3Q8(Vdkvqd_cn*iMog+@cPOc*atU$=OO&IpyIPx*K!mNl|e=;X}B^J0EFMx(f_;ZOoLhHuM(qzTt+kh0C7=-bB zDVaFThNe)}Tf320CugNpK`$z6u}B}@RO!DS+uqza9wMw3(6ILYlcCaLi-nitCsr(s z%Pou!quR=6Bu-(aLS1#@P{FO4y#a*Y)D|-g`6cU7l1f%o#lY^19Z7*me^gn`!kEsM z(`=jk!0b>;I}5`fp_zODH87|GB6zyD17N@oaDXC>NJOB)_R>Itd!yF*qc|m7t?lf` zj_6D}EvjLHu+nGZO;OEla`jD}6`sYaJn^J)yzzPq+PD#tCv7b;E&Nl&k8nvHmSOX@ z2_WHvnxE^hvi6b!2s*e!e-XS#&WNy#MXqTW-hET}OLBH|9$TO8jCq;CXE!K7#oIyw zOJ7xZb9 z+Jr@q5B2K{@~j#OrG*yaMOKE=Z~#ganG#2yJI~K6D|VUswP)kmf7@y*j&Sz#8 z))h)rw`zA8*eT2Z97T~y4Hi@EWQteJXiX)}Be7(Jc?KD!X2nKG_ubkz z60FwV>_9lKoSxZft_(IW`XGdQ0p^=m3+l)OR8EYHY5^}Hlk_}BDVX}<3>}(`oWdaH z_E9TK$fp^p%Du49pxShd40}7JmGWxSdr4vM*i1fq4)n7z*{DUD8`1G*>0oH)vkrHB zIyS|l41j4$f4TV)t0HXqMi;^7T+TNO7p8h#Mr789;f_f3vZSPNqv1l;x{)n3a~#e` z!IPmsSv%hgN0SC_yk-w!uL*sf7^j(kmlxTZGY%YUVmF#QKWtg}m&l1Boqq2cVZ6bj zBMz7d8-$s~7y>o=$a8#kkdR|Bdu>sfb;(K-}gEV=?ws2drU zT0s=Je}_2|?hYLJ=l4G;iG&5hxaO`kF9N<3N2}AA(B#qeqrPu zs)~k9uixnL7&U`~C$^BG&Es)nZhpiwoTJg~f6Z>2B)9c4FmMz*j{i1;FMdq&0AY@b z0QCAe+~y?*mhH7MoM4os;i9q?H)d*o#KHXp&0)1sk8Yyql3;ej$O$BIXll+!wb+6J zWlSUsbJ_#Z(LHSqGM4HV+nbCY^UT5W>x!yW7h3GiRs9*^fH~_A_GeZf=jz%=3MqVI zf1~ODQiKk|vgV}4NmSXxm5pH9?#SYS1?zy7gbJ#c03TJt!}mm^AzcS-vH7wpTHK5YPDc=^J5)ngGXOO^Puh~U2mVP=w6O9e({pW z(aD^`DQHoEo7hsOdVr{wszPJXTQh%we?5<`7ZGT&NXV@`R31^rW|=mZ_5bX8+Fv*I zvF%Sk=j!*%nICGqYiA$%%zyXw(SC-{e;WSaqwnpzhdnN{|6=;Ie2c$${c|kk@2$hE zPyu-;Wbd*0EhTAtE}a~kJ8n8DJ=D`dPtEFfK~GSX9Pzig8QIjHy#a#L+~gnuFM_p;@i zOHsQyGg>&;hbPwtfh`xV-Qms<+&4Aq`pu2jhqLyms?|?#dStahCHZy~-t!Kl;45G6 zevL<`Ig$wwd3b`N&2k)^Ga%R&;<;724X(zR`N9DY*o@9ZXC_D$L7k>A88$c{yr#N-ucE0fQ$d~(e;!K{VS@E#w80t` z_BsAzeO(h&E(I^-e;-PzAXu#9#E}#vVhmXtLa9G72)zWF}`r^j5`Xi5DO%gDk6nKMa-C zd?<&V_l%vq43KW|e{Y9$Td%&X&&{j!RIk3N!RfA5h?A^s1D7C4VzU;B0-KfiMN?WH9b2wf2*j_MkG+pD80}V z;SeM0xo62o)NB$D$sOO(^FO#8Byt--nd_uU3+}l=;{{gSe>Ni*oNoXZ$^^JhMS)o9 z>0k~=V8~Qo95T_YUMu|@nTn{VsR7G}6g5{mRUX6VZ5E;+2$`PPc5Inpkp!E0aNgZ^ zwqsSC(5cB~P-XaT5{5!4+9V1JZv0@a_dV6K-cZkzNi@{cL+|8Ce0E+>->OCo@-xN=gJ1dRSFR#VV z#>_sjm6oje-UCU`W3y^`UKv06*!cYY+^ptmc(Y8<5h zCuBaw_MXs7nYC4KZ|d^M7SG^h zvz^MyiOok7pMZceD(qG|udUGzf-LW@Z1YU%W(=iUJ$ICVKK54dA7d-p)^~ckw(+bh z*1p439YW8Axt+|;FdB~@j=&tiX~cQ9Ndv-Ie|jgaAX}+jZd*Z%w$fWSc4Bez@kQxW zq8k)*8I}}hc7%kjODjJ&yHcK5T8g;+DIDIYQUx(__bOF*+R_CZFJPrDi`(g^lsvR<#u#sq1$oAoKf&x+va0N+wh=LK<7c2()b0#4g4buVx{@k#hT% zW>x!LtD`Z<_8r|69K)h!!6I1L6H)PUTw7e5b2}F%*I0Ed?@fVNo6V3~9M9LhMeX`G(Xn#TAx;mczUILV>(g1d5Z_c8R=wvx3&g`rhjSoe;frwbCJ`~ zW2%Dc>c4NyTskf$qpR^&p0;qu0KXoi(uHYRNY#xK<}gVO?j;=|8E4p0r5hE;qV$y2 zt#$$Uabd%WHA;1EQ3@;V8IgLy@0ZPQb+g$viAO8HdN*>bcAczpDK?5e{sZD^p5)~* zG5%TXVe9iRrIc1Z32_sYf1?QGHV3JiSRP<)Nwgmpm=?+zM8~DUxwTj2D3=7}zJ-dC z-i@MBtj;jl*^I}?bVkfKet}%?lLD0TN$D~_0{7dze*oZCr-Yy|*;(-#V{TVSq_uKK zF!Gj>kBp!|47}0Dsz!ekZ`|USTKbs@_Cdo)TiXz$OPcbK{}ax_f0(g+8$+){q@YD1 z0YUMhdOR&GFHX#MMLK5tF|usEini&Q|IO_=Tm{(>+UYM-jc*^jt~FUjXq)gqA?k-~9%47y(pQX2(yD&`GxSXoRB!(8fv^?7XN7vhoU!t|)r`STUe5&|MEeXq^sNp%|o$-e>{Mt?JLaAk4Lm|a3`YqjBYiPxQGrsu-66;Hmgx0#1CJUWtA^_1R7kfnpum_h zjOHpmMy{unbFc0iK74^jj0qgHHPm7qULu@5FY_+Wf7XK1Ls~=;qEs;kI$_Y9vMx-R z9ws6Pe9sl7V3?i&%eXn+LCBW*NB zEG8e@w*$B;DxIBtTIE!Hu9acIT4_J)PMw95PeMCuBMUM}+x zb@_7%0T82aA*3}r7(TRyU&4ggbT|%kR^aiPaik69?NLmk$z_FZBPytRO*%Ydvvi*B zmuY@@DGxgnOPfd4O3Q|~99~0ZT^B+ZecL+$_2#-tFJPY6E)O-;IvnjAMBnd7 zCw*snA5l3XcAKURjmj<4^&X+NS~Al{hGbm<6jZxj8jJaEL`IF_jgyY_L;weSnaLW2 z?R^gQ%^~qri0+gYVynimQ`aQp+I(PfW()N|J^V8WZ@AQI(xT#ozm^>-?j;|l})P<4e%DM18(H!PH=t3Do#V)vN z>wC(pWWI?a?@hf(6H}d0cR8(?S1{{j7fueq4W_W9P=L@Wr5YAJ;(Lms3vVQY?ru%9 zf}&JxJj`rUAWW^Cjd&ai`rWdUwZLn&)LoBnFkHF$z30p=sUD{6%Fuo7+Ug;Uz z4EFG*ILyN&E6djwDK@6A@u1nDH-T`5vnn&{6MI{QRuC!k_<{Q$L(6Nk&ehE^me71w62~y@tBVprQcaP}Md$I@NjB z+9eArIr#8#pu*EVP%|Z)~%_dBDodNz0s7KsJ&Wn5o6rHQF=&l z=AHxJ#4oLJj`ag^AEvy(;TZbEy!54LVVH+q>dbqCUSRZUg0u#aQ1l7OReAq+&vkzA zaUx~qd{ai9f2~=Wl9XN-D}#6RzmFK9rrq3I>6dK`*RO!%>E#?5;M7qhKAAHr#k48t zJNiy!I?B2@BNvcC=2kb>M9Bng&#{5zo~~-}!HdpMD?1<*v&bA7dp z!$lQ@Bot12R3-&nTVidQ)O3{$VuEg7@`gfNNbj2ie?G7w&H_ZMxuG=2WLzGE=mYxu zc?aGdf^M@erwQz-Mv0?Lb-v>K_OT%asj_S<-Q3w{7(%n%DE!i7(kgNZ@LjmCat

!Cw1`tIBO548y*=#e*&(LTD81sCKF zZHHTgr#FdNk^QNu<2``tJF6h7(^I@vmoc<8fBCOdvqGeVsJI?K=ihndF%%w^%9y@h zdKY^Xmg6+PV#yz5xZj~*Ib&RuFj+|XM=?fuoALH!3ZOM- zzQBBLIr7|IhBzhpG+#reE`B2ufFXM_#l-T3(Upw0 zF`ZoTW?kgmholS#Y(l;j?Zop0AHiw zwu)w#9hyy;f^5Tb;0AP{TNnv3-Hcn!f1Z%eP`%JSDG9y58P{jXG~TtDi0x-bS2bvD zdSC7zrGI`S9>)k(#QAECqB7+s5U&a4ZAx*f)(dKCP2wQ%2ouT+Kn$I%hdE@0JkJ-I?PY+EQ`~ zo-1+s?a5De@IQVDbKGHDq<|F2xmw!v}%}kd7n??t=G`{nu&#XsoSSn4Q-hvWE9A=i*Zo*I%6b@o33;K;w70%S@8*pZ4eJqB zpk9GPF}Yo9b~C3~r*?tmLr~V7KMh3RjHj0OQkqr;q2(3$yp=VHF(A~%f8;cr9f6MU z8J_@iOH0{?VoEGhg#Asd0#pM2o&^Ea7$zu{tAeoLT&1a>ir$m7meL2H&l0)=jfzQl ziJ}0~evx}R?<&TV9VAYi&u+AiI*QNS9&1n%C1p*wLVZ;!$5#o9=43Fg)!GV@x2CR6 zueaSH6VSwsSk zOSqGQ@^JixF7CF@6iQ2*xmdDXN<2#k_uQMf;n;+L*7O-l*$NOLbFC+?>qz@62(MaiM7uDhWdl-6gu$V1DMo2(B@bzHf0fp#x=Q7&^`99r z1-ncCE+QG$m=Ma&p{$VA9h$Pppf1Y1OfHZZG|Y_$5z349_i`BOR*eO`7eUbwp@cdR ziy3$zAC-29Rhh!={s=CGF?dUReuEiT@Zj`WopHUh`6`cbhn5p_eHY^qZmK8Ux!U$p z=#r~xTkY0TXWxbjf3=n(I`io(h2wpsoT(Z>RUjkK7l9-gntpCWoQ^`5*LfU~CB0G1 zS&fc z!2aoa^~%?oMVn&8T12PHNz(#PERz+%Y1y2NCgb-}_Zvxdf6D0FuH&@aZ<-G?sY)WX zB;=;tDt%F$V9t;*>rkv|DaEZ=%J#0Wwfw(oHkO#H<%X!T#+3p z5=AM~e_SuRkM;T~N(ZKGm#YT|w=m|OlG!(4Hbb)_e^BR2|5|s+g!H{?e?{(%)Vi=G zyoyP5#xW+-EwKJANNqa+wt6o}%cKI)H&%Gh@A`J{%$i*gOZ*YqcKcTh#+FKI`a=M1 zS${nC)0cG;349y|q(<3cnX)#r1yKsnDub$b5uStEFPUa#v#w?%K1(G|SyRRW(#Yv2 z?|HBle_??j4#xv})*DvZ%qtZbGI}oQxLv4k5yW<})wH82yCDsF#dw9iNRCBrHEu%0 zV>8$PKk1xsjgR1F{(sOlaqA`k>8_?=hc=STS^|*A{+%`Rk*`i+%$uTm7bhrFcZ+?( zO=O?316Q8)e*5&VJ=RG!(eES*fLA68M+RMp?lpN!rxuAnv=F{BDO+@GwX-SEkUzR>w|s zH>X{0!A1D>6VS#o*`nb6f1Os%mbN;;v?ey#Mu7&pNE}bT!yviGU{)gS)){H7{k${!HD(zK#QwE+We%zwV;=5dKQ_}h%5 z08mEj$XVEOBt=Qops{!|k4s-elEX>Uf3jhQJp{&4zd`XdQ~aoHU>p+pk^ro7B)TOx zwI(-kJ!DA35b4-g!z?X*e$-4Pv(r@hkxT0lP16BXv+GpFtVyOM9MB5li&vFaEd6Gy zn~;h7w=Ge%Ri`eu$(i)jzTo5)s0~^m-SynFV3@hw#@$xAiz)O*2?;~HPvQ8Qe<)nw zvk_E%A~&^BF-W@fx@DzQw9a(9W?Gj3D?N&eXJl)!4>!l@PQ8yeglgPNhJHQ4_OYIA z=8(23cqGpvbWn}eaHPt(Wwojt`u@1{%<=TNpnpc3BFxrayU1Kx*PcUcK8d6bE{2l} z+b{<&HZqprMc6PpC&2=DJwf&!f0mxPGc_^^cSXr0m(ta#Ufy|?=d4AxO0@zutIT+- zN?&Amc$>EtIttm{q-{l^w(tQ6Ez7#(S_brqUu2C2%IK|LcfG5PDal~lz4K%|2_}I| zH)O3UpD+m`KtS0ZnCeMNgX)K+)@W(E>7Ct>7Tawl8x>?O)zmkJmduRPf3|wT-y8QiDxBCooU8^+b;jX3lpcKAW&wqR+jk7v8NMkG=V&W#h(k_)_dr(C+>iVFV zs9le_GP2+#M%Y%3qJ^3)(4Wh(99x3{;}ce6PpafdNUXWOv`S zFHrXZLN=|e-5z163n?~m;+U4STF}0es%>NK;rttwHl?M?R08C@o+jNK}a|w+>Cd*i&41a63B}2eGz*0W0FHd>i*!lw*`t&ItyRtDyXV6hB zF>v8b)9ud6tS>Kce~)D4TcG1T4(~O{IPfQ@6nqj!{3`1~nbHf_|Jy|p1XTG2siexG zHHUts($Z|y1KnH`w`9ymFbge_qX=pKL4khgt|A0l+-9blE^{o@u1c7pTZ?5@+50h( z_EhyCcscF2FfuTZjPITTMynh->WwTZ8k%YaUo=nheyiPYf5yt}Ki6IAKOFJF5a5PF zeW>27X3k7Ojy?vV8x@pQfOR{n+L~hi7Bzk_!aREmwiIsLpdz1>Ho;v=@*(W}l$nTZ z!Cm=Cj={KrrzON*B_#o5>? z#(KBFH0-BQNqATvDf!(M=lasdwAI$o_=WUp^(8=UVmDeWUlsS4C<=uEZAW3E>(dvl zfayQ}YNQzuNoZGi03~BD$PCk7{pNHS+L04%FptzT7fSX`)TJXjhFdhXMCA_os1xzR z_1|Mte?v)Fj7mz8Sj-AHUn{C2#(JT>yd9ZgW-h8d$$B=Xe_CRA0=uY6qN^EzDezc$9mEpL#`!mM zD2kYtk)mp{TlCLd^m|kvuY%x}C+Y_Fki1gu%1H;9%$4r)?(`2WmMfNT2TT>(Ws6`i zWvh0s;@m&FqKrU^^rp=DxP=p{l5jSf!6*N&j$L$l97iZmWrmFH4#$5gp_l6ct8%~2 zfAjl1x~`Bgh&yt{Cyv_XsP}-SV|7(@m_pJzvy68?mi&98`l=PzM)f~)y_H~LG1b{b zA#3gEvPrHW!x0!WiSGLn4D+D6oa%*qQdZ<49_~I6L3}wRkg@U6>w%cAAY{8Jzse~1 zxr!73L_oX0WmEOGt^F@lblAXvJR|wo1R72Sk$)%Vz&iRQLRS*>>SS+&94yqq(8FHO z#GPNnF~x9B^wj0c@N+1P=;4&M=Sa9t5ukJ+d8N=wkQ?0r8Lhg~)_c8M2Nw{;s{12} zcRGt0my(uP8(?;GI`T%~0uA73N-7k%L+2)44svJ6HKM>nG~xplOPA(iAOJD&U2fdV zpnpxF?_|T))+HskPjjQm7Ww5+$8O6zj@kxed5O16{#YXTdwGVWfeD`k*j zC1?f2&1O-j6rZ76pk0L#>TC4ZNm0}%2p#6Dv=CVT5cZMj)2eh z5fZg}j5;Z~wP|q~07L+X!*a1#z1j=)BY)jHLqz$sVv(!R<%Oy!ggq3*%>AAywx{S5 zC4zif%9-DX;rU-?5x%@{WmV2I>&qG6ezCOtV$s7?OE<^Wh6jXvJc7Bl6K#*eN!GC-Kh9xkMY%0;F%ibVU9~#!Y=11! zI;26vcxXb~gzG%xz+40c?Gn9)=!b>Zf@vDQh!Q+x+VNr(jZR| zq=e37IEfaRK30+0CP-T7YTz`#O+xmdMV(qxaJxyaj8iZL}bEKA$al%2P-1!pB zv(dV-A>e``C6@foi8{D_*gG!fGOd`LkEEhgv43o~s^mf-1f0OfN8NX(3Y)1k$Z?HK!x7GpQgq8>;IgQ6 z6b@}EOu%A%r$oTlyT4m>Bz5}uuXexVJUJ}%zLv5_`WZ?V^3%xH{nhT*0!8~<>9j-m zN>D8MBLG~#$|Z9O(9m&bN~Ee&M~O~*i9eM*GZf6WS+BmoH8V*~^?!$2)lCK4I(&mE zuWWv0Zc5V-k77$Y5;g_$*wMk@J1%N@XJ*I9ZRNT^9P;CBRo1!@STjchADgL={GFuq z(ziA<)ji75Cl=}?h`qI~RT+>r#4>D;JHE;Pt!48Pb08hIb+SzV){w_2@%)DjFTEs> z%jWA8RPL3X88VduhkwG+26e|Iqh4ysxY{&eF`qtBDi2=|SQNe1`Z1Vetb5gq;nyMf zP=Mt)2&JegZFFO^%nW`i|GihmlaR=`bq8vy5a(~Y3I z8miVH^#N*5S=)Ws*jWj|@m8Uk$wo0+2{6gGJDdAw$_$l&cy>iq2Eo-p5yhjTa4(xZ z)PXjSFTP=H5YFGVrDIf{up5boFsn~Xf`N)*=awVnP?##M#w`@%+G$ht;M*pbNq^29kds!`$MdzbN@r?RZ$ss46rrhcQkK~5r?t?%P1XVkMzRShx&;|i zig%_=v1!Xw+GSv79fnue_9vKuWgI@qA`~y{2gCP^n^Hjvk_e>OF^qGTL*dxbN!nB- zpImyVdYV$7sYd_|?C=S8*LsiLjbtD;F4MwFptM34WPb!g5pr81a2Q-yQ2tnnC=|-5 zGj=!CDI7D#SEg>Pwhzl@>;^(_PZnGWBQq^Qu|yOGS_w{pp@|_)UcIax;amZ3#}wae z5aF9KML8)dpglYrFY4Fbn3!mPoc88enUa|*b2n>lRQ@#DETQIb&pg;jXibI+tbh`d zuCfWl*?(akP8TFy3GeICq2Wb_wtUbBty;bMrHQ$0iNb_(thZbljWci(Pnfc8gJ__= z3oMSr^Uy`@cS5AXNPO^2w4fKWoV*_Nb6+K#AL7j4TphE?siGl|rWW?x zC_~*QovjL%>WLv}ABKM!I0c%@RZ8Yc89vt&@PFVOdV!h}-uh9%LrqHI!w&*>I^`%2 z#HdySo~?5%MtLIgCKuip@b^lDXiew0`o>uBs|yBlVSE}>9l#Tsyk=GpHX^}E0~=%W zhv>WD%Q4#_owodi?b7@A9eeatg;!TV&o2}BOHOt#*7?N4RVIOkSLL8?lkp{MF0b~S z34aL=bl)@d+KT@a#3x3?uQb=Lb~R_3q%~j<3AixRK|;*r5x>>3yE&<@e9fXq*d3$} zVGt~~;$(b%iKH$%U6K9p`Q5~p=qN3g`=cG8_2|2daHHGj)r(^p62To_&v0ySMC$e} zCf+*QaO^DktbN+S!{=V#JR|b)-VzD7D}TH|uN^h_2{t+BdiW4}R=otxR3FLo({_3( zhpVB%R5bmTV06OG|TZ!*HOS#yYEHUr*x6 z^dt!wp|oX>V>ct6IHhd%N%OZVo~tT5nR-v@E^NT?x>dsgkvzWkj?4LL3F%p^(5ZR1 ztfEvdI`s1?sYuwj!u(!i3bcJL^c8`f3FB}Z43M(RI536%>cia1?z+MYE`P~mUV&S5 zOG}LE{{BWaY4b#B0kK?MSm6{%#JM01)Yyn$K^v=n$$LEPUTkXIqAjb$LJ6B=4vymJ zmtGsoJqK1v8bG3!=zP<7DP=QkzEObqa9GY+u{*bt39|N1+toBqc)k0*C>^N2n!)aw zp9msZZZg%`pqv@=@g}E5JAbl+At_(VVP^Ku}+b6~y!nzLV{J-@#qAFPi-u}4{`PWUd5B=%qe1FJ(IrBqpckS#W zpZV{;KHAUl`A@?id~|ufd)VVL`!A+X%f;D;>^Y__x>-gRWpAqIdBaooi{^&Tg z@~-dpFf5p~+p{x~jB*^zuZ%LslE_`v=CPerb6U=z$M3kaFJTIX@tCp|(Ne>dTtAl* zj1S!r%4`ZKOUfh;2=(5O8{bc7IQCyJyVKI9^_~$uJW3@t#i?SxF^3X2|G7eL zr?iBbBC(gKH7lox^J!pkMo>UhkuI50sR(QP^m$45H!>^ns7@Y9=o?(#JB4R_2{bSvc>(63_TxyQQX8T(C_y1UB7gl z5xcF?LMdjMC$s9hHMu;+%j{#|9kLTG#c0?HIs5gT_kSmtC~iWxqr6AeH&MnkLKqRK z!0F2;&#Gu^Z8o2~6epQ#KNtR3<@Pi0Lk@4lVAIB%OIOC8tx^!|#kYu&5JiJbiT0G_ zXr`=)Xg%C>3D*2OAJv?js(F+AK7XG_?Z^#b&VApH3?fF9=4N%RnO65H8%x^~;a2k& zvT(OB4}Vn^!@wED2Ucp-IDuNTvGS%P%k;!+anUFxt^IehVsgYPGYbevM&;3#vR)B9 zvl3Fe`;^iwQ>+V&^@US8y?>6tXQ%}Ej9r>`BBH-lnbQgcGnBiYq_D_6l{NFXV?4-$ zwf<{_VG=vWCiUKu#kADAh-XNaG87L9rwX|!{hZ>o3~O3Yepwsj zpMSPJiq>~Nsb8BHLr@>b-K$@=c^^4krPpkViQ$v;I9;+)-VB!0&11H#N*gh}M0HWn zqCTRSM@pqawM*~18EAr#D#lb}Cjo~_pOoRcmnT%h2~CY-d!qZy9Yk4I57tp4g7ZM} zm5a_=((@E~hnkD&VIs>>YiVMG7H{u^7%S*RJDeXDo2Q)Gs2_MQrQ+{j-YUAWGf;%t0ig=IBx5E2*#D6~E zk9^LO{UEsad$t(5HbPE>VN(P|6>BFi6bS2^nk~xK9W?IRWZV>GSbD{=8Q{`V^JGq@ z83(s{MLe&ea*i@oJdtw(+gws`#AVugQ-W}XFmvb=l+;#QIv0UH4pKKiNxL`7=4o3} zZB@<$$D(B-HkA(>kvwjue7^jyjeol%&X0(ev=-;7on+na+s70r#g0ivsp2w}jha1^Fr=NJ|Srnxq#kR-rg0W)peVYtBa5l;*Qzf{VzJE5B@4r74 z69vWwS_HyFPIr>lm?~A`x&L3{-eyUX|1wcR{lh| zo13YrshSke%XnDbTG78J{(p|=P`P$SlEEbS`aP`-)bL%4Y45a+(T4cmvf53VDZg%qN644}U80Pssk#0%yb^ zwP8(qy6)_arJGLSZ`%o!GbIzS$Xt3LH4tvNGH{ezUj<sCM?C4oiIPyxCDXNgeQ?RIxCd$fKfUxzu$*+qA(6?(Ec zbU;On>gDPNWiNfBrGIt@>@EPt7rJA3{6SWRuG7`YMY`KPmec7ZuhnVwky9zwU_VrG zWh;$sg|092I7b~M8j5JIHq~x}%2AqnHl*Xp@eg(`I#(8f%Jo7eUA`g}Ns&L5_p;oi zUU{mEIEeBS*q20vcCj1Y&kmthkv}U?F4l>oQ`3>Hdyc;!KrNtlf(PR@eYsyEAO`<Q|lFnd|#;;IaGKjn<|ix zOYL9}D9hPf)aq3x{Nxutb!ICK#g@P(R;PD{%$`Tp0Dt{4Lehq4GSr{J#j43Dy*sy8 z;3`@paB4~Sxe;HovQjf_`nW*XEz7V@2V^r#}`u&8P@klCvueh1kfbn;Ja-%{`>X816D@qz>QH2hZ^HN zEOk{a8#S#`=CIXL4(PB{+*fV^tCTfoN0vy~C30}Si#pGSDkAE2f#0|9$S7|6+UEq| z+`0Hifirm0+|BOJ(83Sr$0w|3{Pzs*Q*Zx<_5rsGW{ z;~74;rB;Bnm z{=3NqEsCT1SlrJlaV8?--Ex}ms*4>OpB9JNVe&6jm;Iuys4e+#@o*Fh^@@NiBiu2| z?SKB~zb5&WfJ&tG<26_<&TdT+w;7^xlZStL^I~zVKiEvX%$%{dn36d62;ryX%|qq& zDp3o~(AHfpr2(uu8TxQF3{8z9;Y+Pez(2=Y-(ecI<3+Th@N z4MVwnK!luB2LBp@w3&^ISoBgpcI9c|9Ze63u0=d7Nw;z%tmy=<_xq1ONHmXkn13z3 zem-gYz{KtN@n18N+bS6Zf{O?-w|6S?5e5kSg4%k?h?LYKtZXvt-*M(N`w~)0_ERiW z0oo4L`_L9j@qQcI>!>BAmLPvT&b5*;TDax7ZtkZ!rKCMbwCHLVseC~kORf?qXE+;&OTAv*O{O{)y6NkP zOAz^xJG1l(9PxohL+Kg+Ur);zuGl-*nOAqCh7A^Z*_Eq#ATsZ1NG&TGy!h*i$>y6= z%FA+u)|7&2lRYb}*WRRNQGX@5gJYyE8&eY$d-LG;t0OX;hEZ5ylMooL1wmvJZ=c`=73iX+^m2&MzuEkPi8VRxaqrP?h|29fO?v1G^Fn{n|NAcTyU~_W2 z7p?vAln-(&T)?dz{UfW^nKw3AB`g(VTu`J%=|T(7I0WWhpnL_(>_>21F1Ox-W_;(F_0D}QvqZDHwx1pz`iRnq~I zy3-YMlZ!*N8Nt;p`E$EzM^zb?qu2S?Bd^+^NiotEoU@QsiM$;;>b?xseBvOSbv?Vb zF|PGHcY z9^)px?JX8Ria)S;_bM8#Aq=q<+jT$iDr)Lh8K6H9CAEkU0)K$Q(2{t9@F-Jr5qSgN zu)_5;v(?n?zF+6@5F5!Ar*j9N?UG0%nF%6ULV4B}@PDE=MY5!s+}60>sg>n@sZQ4h zuL=g=FB{M}y3iei;nVXNSa6m07W`Y*wfBtWQ&HgpJ|K!A->KAAfKD3x0lcksM>D{? zU{P%CSEkKFYqhE{|iFW8D%>`&kB`R>me>ZwtO~< z*iA>cNsKTd(Vx`S?C5;*?G~JJ{k0GoX4T|@am2hBo|d>s}jlNN@%Xb zi)CJKE9eYz1K{pvv?aU%nnVUiWaKbnLZPaD&?|-=G-NhE@ zNq+{Z?&72_x5iQxMK{zDCGARys1;>VR8?sn@zSpWI##Mz`KhGAk%23xH$?@tTaQg% z0xBp8vsDQ-&116*(F|b=&HY2!?p+gAan6-srt4;4MOA?g(p-hr?NoepI<}=%d@06Q zek3!G?mK(JAIn-YF?>39gCD64H#VPI&VS+wyUnQXge_c*Q8d$Ek#SVaXv;#aW3%+- z^9?A1v3-uOHhkdLM9Um269b}L_aM5i$LmxE~sow;*vW}EobYR9UDCQi-s+% z^W?mj7EAt)Qi=jn#O|Dj?+0u@93Hu0*wv1GLoY@%*5XLj?BF1P*&pFUG=FB9TlL7g;-g-njc-Ms8<}JBytz?&{*dmhTYkk6;d2}O zFjvp4h6)m(y?s(C;vljv?tep&ZG{pxd~wsNvFhX@R2GuWw3PuQh%;0+!=G8BC@C7D zTuNR}9#=Lw6lx_X(x+}`05$S1zG!qV%y>qUj)ZDVnNKfy7Oa_a{i%jRD_JUumiQNE zFT%|8kS`HdcbWHlRHrio6GuF(;SK4atQ?0+dTbM#j7C5L0CJRB}R zt?tfJtDB#ge^Ul9WfdTfK%}vRTuyu)^qj;Y1~d3`^La}Z2BxtmrkmU3;+ZvIn@AXGM2iVxJV>wB|K#bmLCs`B z1~EyGb>(c80eVu<%5BEIW~)OtD>4kBOWi?6OQQRx5oD7?wMWE%zVrHx}?iW1CU=HIvQ!!J}-A^M&{r=teboZ_qC?u z8JCTLHgS`903eEn{t9aMa0$0G`C*vKmmBhOr+*)p>g6Ru*+x((*gM34n<_%OU7O*> z>+n}ToIuDmR0Qcgncr7nI(}5bt}7INP4sm2`NaeS$H6(ATNpO&`U=B@L9Bnuii;MBw6%9s~VTOI(9eSX9|8MvhvaY~Z7B z=<`Ma^A4k@tQL+nLu}~)Iqh-L07|a3KvCyHX(J*Bj)a`@(6!5NLj@#ytkVu58GnP3 ziKk^pfiifZkQMwhcPx0Bl}mIOvH_fZS=cdNs3?QH@S`2U!{SNlxj(X#KId9oN3_k@R$R-}!L^2$s%-*Hf zn0uY1^Yvk4!O<)w>BJiH)u7c_CStW+wpmInFK<87PwTewLdt;#8#3N)%zs}y7ge_T zrr84Exzc^)>Ove{8%`q_I2Fz9lG_%qvy)dw>zwJ~d7r1N$dFM}M`Ui|WYfu+%8p7I zIF{9|P&gn<#=%&zE4W$UB}9&;ZPYui^h~xH7NJ1~V{e$>Q?D;z<+cG8=Kl%Uv*H() zjeY!)C-3aT#>dKa>UKE^V1L=kWjetRhD?F^lY3>mJmFu z-03aZ=t_b#`~qr2EhNGWRG{+9R=XZ805^}MhB_%Vr=v&-a zDjVO^+U7ifq+NFMQz^0O-%*JS)mPaL?n4i7xV#op$5Vtbm2a~-7Q=L{ERiR;XRm%Y zq%+<+ZCJ6>v$f$FD|3!G+xY7+h_h@EJ*sHffxfzf$C0#VJ0>h9xqeRUL{Y#t(2B1Y zD5c%7k@Bf^NL#8YfPaJ-&`hF4Ok3~3odPGq->EsD6{nr{RZg}(6%9=x5iucqXcC>z z9?)rMSNQdK&OI5_fL<^AjlMdhtT-m?2_M*C?r*vHwZWO}x8=97{;W9P*_#9AemeNb zKa)4`NmAEI>%ej1MwrLDBxoH7S9Pxw9|ohQxNx%%tVey=ZGT7Iz~qh@m9e!g%-jgW zFKpy_w#I(D&%h68-$TRctcry?s2$1v(_@?QL2vv(6b6!}t*B=M`=uO_ZX zmmqWkeGQ6J1AlX-mDpxXv2SiWBJ(-x?g~9j?M5kyZaZSJIN6ISZIA(c%oTh1Ii%Z? z7>}djl@*ME@p1y{?S`}S3FwMbcJO}8uFrPyDkCV86TYE0t$R)E`6MP_gsv{P)U$fq zcC08cQ`I$t~|6Np&^i{ z%-dW@>wm3zzqmUV-`r$o*yzCdYsKGe-XNBZioHai+)$q`-;l^-dB0!HuXrU3jZZsX zzUp9roGANq34pcD?XPxU_n~*u42PGSYt)+yZQ^nlBxTVo*Z=$@h~R$D-0UF%g>Ko` zl0!>9#!J5d(+C%$)bn=}qI=6ifpKXn%S(YP<9|;#)rfLOU@zb5LWJ_;vvPJ{4yZYO zaj}1-O7L(QvQe+Fi$xMD2N&Q-*Y7DjzvyDSU!*Y)$O`h+x!$EPWn#V9qimI-3j!?^ zhs(B+C3+x|#OuP%gc3d=T(W?IYQqA8Km9p6KZ@<2u61SqCIk}`5EeF9*|(MtXa7t90oE2D9+Jqni4vqFw}y+Fpl1*6HCap$#oeod?xeu-hF6=1^-%8 zAptTb-U|-)D$3-hqONO#4%(zSL4QFrXn%yEpMfnryLr_mI~Q$EAi11yx*y*+72~_> z0TN>MB9MifZqhdoQEOJ2buOdQh$KKO_#VZhPD$-w9%&aiK+6$BFkdzAUTe{2{x^^M zw)uF^6b}QwYm8=wnN*b$3dL^QwCALR)cN?j!Z{V0-Ol3XQo#n9nfd@oy<{}|^nbq& znM%TN`L=9%&Je{hvzSce?sH-Rq)DYotN+ME}g=>09of5H9sjoFvo9@`OB+y5kM6p<*PKHig`FKy=ujlx-8ShNNNVjT zX4Snf?r@KNBhJVH^BwSnyf~OE2jr-*DJ@+VmyN&&fU2vjjcJfMzFsD^D zwnPoGnc0ZF#e{M>HZzSjmxc@#1h3VhM@oO29jA^n1A*c->>h_Jx6t^ zeH8AS)=PO%Qw{@@*019?d;IWxIzJlc1y5H$qPHYOhI|^i;)2uO?ey89uk$XgJI%n% zRZQ-Nk?Zesk5_8j8-e1?y6VtklsYbh@<$n|gH0bN`6N)4O9OU|jFOlj2TRms& zcyIW8=S0HAy{YkqGJz)GZm z-C@gmYNC7^bKf_kkiLSQcGGZ;N9!p%eI^A_1j1(U4svMC0Doy5YMDBd!oQC(1RDxIevBVNC-A-V}OX6k@j?;VG&CbgHDmUt! z&RHzH)({MBi03zs44&+vi|0-#E+CS{KdXk&)D!V?jTXWM!zI_FF>9gAtcfdxW|&+( z+zC=|LzVduPJeCHQk*$_VOY@$xzJ|zQVem+9`$ZiGa%B1-vw1_HV~r>nH;F5EHP}l zNT)KjnOK&glE}FL7{|>)Q%_R#1l-J5%SO}z*OdSrGWXzg)h*pzlVnNPU3}YXRfrd` z-a~D|=$3fC;hk?UrDMp_GFjDI9$56U=W1&k9kX7{efu%1tEOgv<8G&vD+FBPsiG>YGTnk(aFp%hW9%0$i6 zzzcBgn26cZOKm5!?{qM4*%ZB_P*18YaX7eU$mU|F-W5#A_wBY&fJ=ob*@zVehIkm3-XJde|AQx)IH z;4Q73YyK}vyG8JxiL&2X=lbZdo;)KOckE<@v$cf#Z&(0*lJ=AftY8WFe;cnD#m{(i zX@6loai$KkAX9(*APj|KM#H4aHoI1|Q(I# z+88^T>fMfm@V0^QZ+BzBU&tzEJNuv%hN58>aoj$}wv#yio}Hk?{DMTMV{#2~3iGkz zF~40y0U;{vH2ZmxVZ0Jb+d+-1wqC)imyX|OgEz9$s_H-;xo(r$seC))=Pj!_aC)VWfOE5)!Lh&gYFMm9p zJ`7CvRYJRf>yS7AC>r3&)|H>M7GV=U9-jY7;}QL>GNy`;41mI z{@|ot=+dD|MX8#}v5N+-a9BoSHGhKw4q7!TMw!(vj<9!Bf2EKp^K)=4-QRw3I${!9 zvDMRhUR6lsRg){<`Y2f>aZv7&q( zyGeL5EDlvS%lYXGwgIdL9RKz7zy4v{DmM%R(qQ!0?LzrHSQCwsgx28R0e_-7uky-0 z8fE>~Hh$sA+sD99RVa3uYim_{n5)8iEV|pHI_V34$U2(L`#shr;)@f9XbPNKoOWtC z>r)*KQg~LlcAz-^2L+%`~j{ zssJqy|JAhnuzNW*7>UWDN|4GBn|XIPqpjj{59bm$anQZUsA)F;8L*kQuuRdpUKf1>xIh0Sm;rBAZd9hK4^3%O~-jU=gCd=@I;D2k@PA15VDF-L^ zFr%3*5woU8SLuB^=a#qvT~Zj*xoF|o-7of4h*PNv>WXH{!#Lpfd$#?vh9Qc%o-`zL z+Y|N0rrl3<-=&+qtn_+;**a&7Jc}IdbgT*rU2UuykKM>dq;iU=`ADfii#%ua1qtS` zery`XN@c-bE=A=V`+p>#AB4X}?@Sx64or9IPORgLJh>l$!TNB2Ssc&ejceJdTWgWp z={R-l8-t^xi?7&2B)f)e_Iemkwl z=V4=Bf*ij?!0p0Is!V`Q5>pcD!3$i{WLn5{= zExZw8yyX^#wtor)AjhMbqnM)x#h`$x$oMIueN9mq;Q6ax=4i$vTP_#3hxCgyg>tJ1P09<%;78)0j0p7)(MHWm)=?ts>@FoQEBs?DAT{$;BP4pR$_-w;M!O? z3xcQq*n@DY?Gw~8HATuA$lYq6OsjTRldE7JBy>%AE`I^Jtjc8--K@7nH|Z8RA>tVp0W*3>6IqTEW2iSl&l z7_VS{B7cE^JS6*_rnu8KYze_rAL>A%DDB%DyQ;_GFPq&~gL@iXa(Tb9ShGuGr#!km zcskN#r!6-6hnBC8_aS`Jw)8k0yUrXx3RN-K31911u@g%1z&^S<=(u_TxM4yxQ&wcn z-yvVJT&@`m3-q(gCrGEcp+lXwZ&Kd!Lt*aP?0-Wi)m9DgW(uUL);Mn{*3U*4#?t97 zg#5bfHF=?_MM1R}R~e7$aJjH)_&cKJc49IQ8Y>mP~oktq3S1t9vRfT(iPT5^&vW&fgZEt;5Wcc$(Zli!&Lq zVD@`Vy3PQR%m|b!&r%g40J%?|VV;OMv486SEI+Ug!cTCUm$$)7$d5zg?{krnBNuE#ITd)$zui zs1++{2J4o3jt3`2SO#x+J@}!hD=<-wNTAWgyk;rAqxv=1v zu&g z07Q+YGH|gINV_5hahyaaP4~MI^>Wwu;B-?OpqYgDL>Z)6r@CG#Z_@41M1PV*z2^0; zm;)q$Xu~jVnwjk60G7VphQkmo;jY+k+Fwm?^L)_@|M>p^0a}~FzLBxii0(Dcq;fy< z8sAI8G09Riju8~NnTFb%8KyW3(Y{#$2!u)5LT$0OvC87VwY1oZRE3k5*Z5!)WmEvR zc5XO?6dLLV5=1hX=&5%!z<`B4;ByaoUSG zJMl_EF1|krbHPlr>#jkLOj~H}ezGpHQ{Dnydt0@LH^Vz_UF>2c=oBpbJZ7hkGIAYn z(QK4ND~I}5(<@TKrWFy)GjxHa0^%C0!Jt7%yUaNcU9{jk87^_ca4~*s7Hq5{pXNv*3BC8?b+rO$+@%6uzHF`o`kdHKA z?!`2pb!0biQ-nd;Rub$`nnY6G$x9yflB-&Cvs zjq9V2WT!lAVLRkJIH@=4BmHoJBq-=Evp=}K*!cGFN_S}|xjxQk$2eNMa^+Swyt#a0 z#-yF_R6p~~(xJ)l>PvLs5Z=qt2ZbQ)CC1mHIw7m716)Ubv*eytAxnTSOGDYsb-gJX9LxgP> zmCqu$Hdg@W0lQdTz*t#DdG|y84jQfLHuy4-bnm58nnRxVbN<<`1vTx&JKBPQRA|9r z0WoUma90+6?dtbyNbLZX#!tJk%u*)iR__wQQBOv|sei7&_B+>Upu!0!Y=ceevD#ku zw4OuWUxGpF)MzV!+2~6CTJ0mmsYA|xel6RI$$gDM-J@ur%_6BkBA24XP-smPk zNi8yhv*@cf$!d9E#9?gURKQP1H85z$cXJX zt_C??t^j~~S0lBdY{yps1U6Z8S2O#C*H-0QV1E`C^~^fo*_1a=k*fNMfv4V5nJK{P z11a<@pH2s~S4R^JRt{yfubwK-V3{D*V1~eFEx>;K17@-DN#!d0Oi4sEYBaMl z7k~KaEWOXHb=icv0roD>rZ)QxyDrV}d7U`F^Fuu0Q+nhG<0v1)$I4bQWs?wI$Hp&l z$P$y(z0{7-b`^!6S4sW-vQ1Y2|Fb-pnt|dxx>zo~mC2h|9QeD(Mq64ryl3~R*XGq| z>olgyTVB^*Hg$X=Ddt)36_1iBvdN%Y^M91w8EF(Vq}D+X-p1}2U{BL?1Cr&5e;Q72 z0->d;P;R|x(}=QwC=NZoFOhIu^KvF~UqWRa^W@7~%dm3IEQET^)z2Dq4)M%TlV}Fb z;b6$RqbfhaYQz`3`aU#D#~a721kNauyU)#|2F3HZcPkf%?mqqQf8pC({~I{pFMp~& zM>WpU8F)9_7WV%!ne`X%o@Mh&M%rd8M{XZCp@J=N~?WA$w}!5 zYpCHRd1Ecq26JeD$V1|2(?(7$98A|w`K5NkS6WAS6%>#tJj`wW)n zViP~wzUlSmm}$u!=znRkcL5!d7#JHOn(%yL6LVc-Lx1&r9vY1wmTo-nrGI5}u}685 zGyXHoYZf#nS%P0CYGY{ZnuiW09GsL+m?*!DEvm zwjkshvgzVhhnU>`rQqsFK zoj_C8N)Bbb!$y3;+w9RA*E)C?M1+*Wc*|I3)1fg2S?@ZFef8a45`S;V{gw+2hAl+6 zu^@C?A+m!+QcS1OXKmB7j?g{>H1;+vxySmIxzXq?r4JDhhTr8$qzSI)9S8lkxIUXKNFuu%T9nehe&Zlv)jPv~`P^2!@xz%mnP%z4;%9j}$F1)Ra2Iy?Tp2x|m3+myNE%Yxj zj9Lx!w)}~$>4|#J9e^18<4hlqE}e1F2r~ra$FsmK(cv6_Huyny-9Bi6w<-V3lSs7< z)&(*wSI^h4T7N5EO;IYjY_r}kzf*d2fIrBjS#qTRR1MR2l22@SCGwd8aDlUeB(ljZ z6(#Cza4-60m?E=+bJOwqQuBRYac|siV7$54v&59J63-8Z)Qsz+5W&XB&tk9 z8?X`yR!+DbCwl$%2dFrWt_OXlpHoRW21wo7XVUl3@HpYEXZ|K)%=MvhK235d^M_8L z->nn=xWxF!es9%bWnaiI@vYB}GoV_mePQN>i3@6ym_UDJ=l#^-y~WJhxK+zPXRS~H zs{o)=%B$l|2>^F1ZyD@AHuOLV!GmW=8{%t1#9yrSech}^J`2u44L4+)f^k8RCHp_j zY1*bGWNZ$si>B^2qiL0xP4odg3#{U!#nwjmDh;)8hNUevB9N!92wr z)7@-XwIGLFs!fA4)g#+P5M>2{V9GTACt40^`MlC`sPgm+fu_6O@NUe{cn{XxE7R(Be9;YZ?7zxdwau_LGzZIj3iaoT zE**!)qE#l_;pH;~8Q!4{Y4A-hwh>vK!^Gg|K2&9u`)-SMSP4MRt@+R!%^t(Bsd0bg z-MBd{-R2W23}8C+sf%o7(+*AJj`#g>A(e1y+qmWbz#FLN{!o z93=2h@_UDM@qv_X%g?Wb1Rkw8LSOBi@I>FW|;Xp`M()zZLW6VY8eZ zjIuv8ob(x-qG8kR_APPI@h%@~gh2FL z8>?TlDL^n&D?0flQc5=`B)_bj&kt+F$aZ_#G|hlsZ=D)pm|#*z1So3@`5`0{mQR4S-C&BH^W75Ai?$SBcxEDrE(JZYnJ2_M`gC5u>bTY)Rur;{n&&gUya%}Gc z5b?(Htr=phf^ErhkPxc;l1v8W}<>T=>Bz{{3Fg0Nd z*<8r>(H+>xxGm`bN`a|VAZ2x}{uWlVvDvD*Ww}-vWqzosp~+o{reA+Km+PTwEFj6z z!4R`SH$C@y?AaPz$jZ7K%!F1Ytwk=YX>q#IC7g!8n^iQlnkBC-BB{W=SShbuyXrE! zz1xNKO@>2xGMW${Oi)9UCZ@2C8~%J#A-bQ!Mx2AxJ`WGE%vTe*rxnxWxB&WcmW@xtFa z?|$3|^IB)aVb#2nk(H5BJj>@trak^C8b{aB<2(|FR4yY<2rhr6Xfv2xwPis;Ln#%> zI>TO|EH*Jh;I$3)oMBlsz3j2LJia@wT{Cm|{c02ISxReL91K?t&fF-1MbIM~(n;#{ zhT%%H7ibsPRPOYlAJ3Pt;^ko0;%NH9vMWMgAM^DkhRG;z!z82C(U2V%%rBN^o!$;7 z+1+XQG&k^$PR)P)hN&tl3>8iFB%j$hWIphV#wl3)_v8Cv_R}W9t@Qxc`_K%TTnDo3 z)E;9;Adj3xtXAj6Hp6WX8!uCk`%(9@y$hci1juDQ626#Zt7#i~|4+}?gfXe#mt8BW zHQU2H>I7C^5}TQa$j9IJ#dhyniB-YWtaX2t#V&kE!z5Hlp$h>A;B>~0 zVGFli)G9x&EGr8KJ~V6BxL=o{O1FJB?fEi|Q@4?ZmFW+MAxZYW^(tvPTyAXVqaZ05 zDB*==(N9+yNXyXpa>`bHxM+x%tv^~4;F@>NEaaJjK=L@=5z9NO8en(rG^6?3;j365 z%^)7PH0pnp!Inae0l7bx*f3F!K}XR3ND69D-)>qX*lfqye1giRTPI9|_8jPe86S|x zM!wHP6pdn{Oc%TXPGY0PK*?)1B15$5g4a2C6G2D_VL;LDkSZ>Hz(MR4%XdnC>8Gk) z2-{lChm;G=SBGoyhGGP6-#8KVyq~p}@Nlcg!qI=UuuiblZCd@v$I&<={~zbLeKA_7 zaW3`k7pv3_PGpppC~L-HJ`mQPKb#+*Ha%Eb@roS*FO2aZWrc88OSU)8gM?oW zn7UIY)isHfbi(7Wh0U~FvYymx+f5^~AIO&=33&ea<3#uOV>9sG%vs-7<;XgfR->P$Kcqwmhmejld4Mfmw3RiS4h= zEPs}4v#i<>p^ISmE`odV7C$mZrD^XN>%b|5RN&L^{uhxJwCz9r?qB4C#rZ>%)R%CL z&x}?xwJ&lW5HjstL%fo=EMG!OPOpI4+4X;Mtnk_7{h3D9g?o++HR)n^Vbgbrj9Wsc zIVtJ%ZY4yZ{#$*0>GU$WgI0QF;jYBlu(b2QtS-pBgmv|LARCin9+t+>6wj^wM0%Iz z?Mt_37FQlEB736Pyg+_cPF7S4&QJqXPHg5#%O;? z9{D}>^s4iaWd5rGEL~cRL1IhkU7Et1P$$@?0k$2(_r52udYCrSn}+h4l>5RRSMMF6 zxW${kP7PPWH>-1QIm>fNEqhxzP!;&KX64vncRE?>JN+$~?TA2BQyD7&=51dqSkXZU z7h6=xfz&X+U5I*rxdBF|g;hej0%Ta}~~ z2wGGhOmD#_eZ)qniqy2LjuI_{)0Hm7)uf^U*W_z|eSaL@XL+IeCeTfGsSI)euM&r@ zQz7wVqY0JUDbJ`MhWQ+9Xu}nLyZSiB!V%MbKPT(xeJ$Qx5NMl1tNK+(0=s_#$|S(+E=@frPDO~I`8=1V& zCOyV4dT+C8WVmo<#J{7Yyt0_m;>*EF;kU%4zH7t1m3skz#&$TZu?_rumD`R50?$8# zV@=WZl0y13)ooWCisoqQ0!`f=E_G-&UOJ62vo;wENNMPz;6N;pzGi)475qE++$=@< z?FRw(da?rI!e+A69aw*LusMY;u_qKV#eA6QN%gr|jlk7nq5q^(udVG})dGl4Q-nwF z1G}DGyR#dW>KxHZL^vI-Z8L<<5B_bjlFHt=Vi(L1 zIkI13G_6od2_D2zgBb_~(-<=&+mqnB5>%-!?}mQ0ahJ_vHYR`8yE?b_ilX50LaIAl zh1)~S%yC^w%$c+Kd*)*?e^n!fv9A5IzgxS+e5&ddG8CATR}~UkQpD!F$sWg3#qAfX zd>l1A+GCf^sZcZm`YGRlX7-5Ad+qDr-kmL9yMv{X!0Z#u~fcZwaW+?0m&- za)!8FsI6oDW%7T&y@lt|2lGJREZ1s%e|Z~UDSDO7#}Gw3H3|H{&E$U~E4{5jSWK+= zY+MZhOW=o`;Bd=`@ZxU#_M9eRzw^cAoNPpH8MpbnPi%oVta0M1)76@3x2>1X*F(ZO z1~;n4hV9ysW{<}1ipczC7Vph$D&Jr+#P>;>%jNE5A{9zRqO7 zjX!MKv6O!%y?Zi>Mi(!+V1SVs$9`!Js9k#3+8X?=w|It&SeX9+!L9xU`!#aFsvV&G z7qvuo)`Kzf4U4i=I@ZTcW%SDazp{=mEi}pwdSm^0;D#3y!HJIZ`a;zp%3t4>YWw+( zAwUXgr!bn_{-q{Y*%lt$OP>9RzrG}9H}e- zo*h{*^I6g<$!PBqD2hMZc&~1?@3!GHi-P}j=tTDBmZOx+@Mi4xY-+0u(lCT-tKg?(%;tJKzZL`anbE$;{bD#E~VEOcEuyS5G5C% zZp6l8!YT^(mMD_T?QHZxTWEf!Ab*>3?wFPXI+Er{;vbuXca$ zgv9wZl_b*gew3xXUQ-rmnnVu41@9@f=Sm+oi8V#0&@mUC_kB7y&~t!p5}(zdHPdd8 z8y#Zg5QsapZxr6SiBrIwqczOCJzKJ?cCW#lxqL+Soo*$5sZ5|cOAb5U&?RmqDTxaN&rloH@Y+_8%s>JSTkM^J~8E5V*#R&RS7y%Q&I5^B=!CxRN?*(PX*SC^ z9Q%k<^+<2oUdYz2q%?S6K@k9!_ExKqk}8h5d=T^W=v#j`lRYH6bPh?fGH{DNkKV?f z9jCq;aLKoObmo`7=9QU1`6-I(sAv9`7py(MgbrAgZhjHMcf&DT&?#oYkS z3u@DYdq7_})YgVcG|)m{cL-($!Y)Srab{yZd*^uBB$EM{E^&S@EnK>EA%oAiBjqzx zTVolV1JZv$v_7q`cc+gR-Dy(JW+>4@+iYJptm{xXz^>L@5>mae^QHE!$Kgn)+E#2B zJ&AZuz1)LyD!-I|W0E0FrrQ@=U>?4=r*s-~td6T@)?`NTDijx8cE;`|N`@#>vWQG) zB$|1sEmunOh~?v4UkP0Wpv-$BR5|cuoUZG_MNog9K88yD6=-<~=&_ZHxb{sYls6uu zei|;(pjLSiUsWH)z9Sd357>nidi#Nc{DAObF8uYXmUK=Nu8Ga;EOUHt7X64}E#Oh! z{-1}35p@3L*(!p2+-l3*ZG6kJpmg9w04UEfCkBCF^3IM~^J3T16wKB*9<#ml&|3{W zHcEdTf;Bg-ybQ!zh`2rZuq8-gp5giqZUH%p;=vvxSHGn2h&Ei0ZbW(p$Bjc)~t_sXLI=7wK*`hu~1WIOmT78${ zu&~a^*H^jX^~c8P+vvoTPu(Q#Az&?}xg8h1FK_%HpLW`LbTsnlH6R`Q1ke?c+EjJVyObGUQL%xfm0zFg$mzX13QFHr41|a>J0by{oaSiaoMDDazd$>^eIXqQBHr@ z8_!<^7~M!gq|@KGn8JX*sb z!~yppHA-LH4&Jmm5icr3vlAl2<| zIma(;I(tv*VygW;QNngQ-1KV&?Gdfp4o-hZYvK;!Tx#=?zaWURs0I~TRPc=>18;Y- zaV&p09WXZ|_VfK*g+%}!{uY16jP&pA^uOLtQFz%-^+7s}E*AnrNOrl?)eoAYSDcc% z)@Z>NiKIEe6_gqTlC55lGQxt)xXm4BbX^?6>MaG&dXwHE8X3(YNtOOfeZ#rOC>-a&N$j4TF!qQUa9{=>{{x-tHc7@> zh2T***9P0{=1N7bqU9+3LM*{jO>r7K86DJ)bYk{!aRaV50bO-TkH^(j_@+}e^xic> zW5yk~sV{pprWt&-%W;1#NlK1Wx$$U``6vx|Mwce#J{W7?RpZqmgZhMKSo7F&I-<#< zE+dsh=$7?u9$m(eT8QRx<~7f!siabZiOVpU2VK$71vw1#Z7vxQxT(`>FOEp!faKVNTK;MOyO+Z_VijVq2rB>3co)<+xCMC zj)bbu?QYk{-vwmYH5EfU)^NoW+nNZ&K@fpmb`iA_5F~#<;aCpi8n#sZQKE93Jw1cM zKGFcc34GDwPJ4e&<5FGV)!E5`24&YV6Mtpm!`edGf1&ZeO0_SbqmZ+8l*5rv+IkS} zV>h~;GQA=}hjQ7QG*R;_dJnd;PJHol2eAG69yrw+fKt~}yo4K|JZ(g{L{y~EK%ZDc;D=c|eL?Rs6r0T_w#gAjiV%t6p z!M)E&8tv5?>n=z9{yq#|Tw)Lms$(M!?KW+SMY9P4gVq@%zk{*BfMBd2$(lzYvx(%X$f;v=eYsuCP z`a|X(5d!6}P15b7;$NcVpE!pUI^@op<1)Odvf!^{m_5$9aYnOFrrvCOS`0h#Hd?;* z)$Zr(-qylYCw#^8wzCK7b(II0C75noPE@9+mlT`{+^lNLXWMx6T}xX@#a1ldG}egV z>@$Dm4X38UGwJr$;tIf{A#)b(j6MW*;AaL4$-GrLy#XS2I+HKyI1KCi5ybXu z%OHv>-8`S4+}2!V0bRF7w_a&U_0Py!AB=za{Sq>&S)p~T`T^`r73oqp~hb9leF2GOx$1#T`Xok23n{W-K!@J5&ASac-U32&U&cNqoK!@oO9X2@%yTRbUE7R~9{l3oG4sd@=#gzMW zR?F$;D9YCvkML-GIA}vn=W6DKA2yxV!Nt+)Ip*3ban0MX^)6XS(#9V2_M|4$5^+3@Dh1qgrHph+5 z4vVEze+Te=u2mgQ><{Jp&3zijs(Ca5YEp|%PkyG8twGZ-Z!zECpOk;qqyC6|nPwkv z5X-mjfwx=ZQnMC5QAb<9b?<;N>j%qO}H%Xz@mingMMYEJ{ zw?CH3B-G$kP{gQQ1Koc$b!+rXwCg)1h0koY^_)&(*t1Kf!B%encL}`%B^DRVN1f+f zwKjFux2^PE0;fV$g=7HE21=EAxWFLWEXE`qlbS`f(Ojq6m&f5G(tXq!O3bBe9)PVh?!3E_XQcY2_ zQIo32P~=id6XX(*E}d^k_b&5!_DU`Y(;N1N^>$9>d{BQy*tYvi-CmM-we=s4ILY5t zI)gj&4HEHF&~=!hgxIHb@mDDkAozv6D2!qCzsC`x-`$0t^ZkVaElZGk8N@j|g+@iSOvRjrctf@AY;Y-U$>OvtwY z;Q4<5i<<1lvYnav1q#eOnXpAWYnPzh0G?L!=l>#@Me^okg+NtIhRy7S zzh$V{G;FTLTg4)8SrMvftuN5HC671y5D|YKftu|%j#a7#SY-=CYeS_)pwm7fc&pQd z-A)XUL}0g&Vl*a{+uq8Nu0$5qm96ZL4D_BkB2MxE$J<1}J#n~R(jIf85+ZrmlH587 zZL++2ls2CWoFJ{cU#You+H3gud%b^djRpzUozZX)o2mTrC}#>(eGaobE$pL+zHxu^ z$rUOBVl0c%b_J5kuwo%S0l`7{n|N4j&>ULWKJ1K2j0v2;dNPQ$OgqbU^DWwlcI^~fqj2?dM*b!XihTBvQ;g0gh~xCg;dD@+42UHzpUI3 z&!@5>e^^k!_Yc!)Ig7&=DS>U+a{WuR43U2)-Iy@&j+thkCz8jboBEADvCjf-g*naJ z+`c0H+#ObyO9J>dv;#Zg8+6e}#*y4Pwt4vY$4C=IP55$Wt0dtDryg5k6*hkjQ_1YH zWcX0p0M-F=rTMx;nlt(6VN(AO8osN`c&2oMp?v^sr9xqKHp7EoAR}!JR~k$OqAwQz_(9hbM%n1etP4m&(CW~ ztb?YkVUtT->?R6bUkwcCAZ>qt=VSTpWL|j(oCNnGYd^uZgiTe+qsM=!0sYfm*{>h} zqw<9XhIjM>tY)fBvQuZ3yRF&6CwKHI!3!V3If}$9U@%<0>@4pp9+3Aa)u5ry^%KDI z4W}B5l6RfiFvS-HR+BLWo6Y=psVyV}<40)gQNLvWSc%wOm`JCbNz_ppe{jhX;L44rclf|tqmnbe0h(SJCSc=rpUg#j3qSvEwa}C0wqF8D zrr;?ThMjGW9xH#}<|We=Fh7iHfkN%EG^GVx*Yq{V=OZ0Np>>o}pUSiF*_8u{T9t@) zVA!uQv8)m)E!OTkAPj!9ixY=&rM5;MkR3k5qSYNWs91 zKI;Fr%O0{pS7wcZi#Sf|V>5IRs&RlxT~kF`>I7_w zgFab(c5ohzpgLA{Tbd6TSbhLer1!Lt16*px<%|=Gn#*uarG3MCUYTEhrWaxj6Z6t| z4Y=k|*KvP%vmZ01>XMFi1G zYIsqvEPQ8(J0Z}!zLiv-#wC*HZ z=7mt8^J|uB5`Y7;&6MN(MQ-yjas+iI%T51-*2e7FvRMe#ymK>i*y{N6GP|)-48S#4 zVoAM&I+>3F@)WOK?s%z+NH_`6>1;8nJR^BQ5-Xbyp5?s96LS`8_ho<)d5cOQTH6QBvL^F{GSloL%qyz$h}bAHp-?sVex z=R7`z`ono>TG|PKsxFx$WF1ho zxHAn)(gSrVO;@LUo?RS4=SSE#QHsO34L4jUzYqZTTJo=wIg{c%d*a<{>v-qMRg5ah ztcSpjH+E&NaRns!1+Dpe%!44x&Cq1$HC%s;5^~YF z$61#GY*IOBd%uE|kD;~n)$TXOBM6po>i%c4O#sd1Gc1h>TS{GR=cZi4hjMSzi~cM2 zQ_qhdmJv-qiUwDkXcV{?vjog%DN?+h=2RYq%p;|Zw-vViMa7mcD$tICq{g>#+iAk( zRY~dZgHlV^xfoyd$wJY1%;tYFwH&K{2%)^7SXBjQj(n_hj47fmz~Q<*S;zb)6m5Mv9jrg$Q<9Zqa-}4>{Y`tF#L;QC!YN?h zFwyZzjz?pXcPx7X0W@>QabAgfft<;e)=i1`9^{1k*wV=8J?KXe+UX*prw^>7w z08r?+rEx!<{}7l|!!OyF+MBqZe6zRNChna;1xtiWkR+`ZbObRkX`=I;h$m@k6y z-pEswP=tYYH0b=a0dJ@zl-e6=^=`&XIUV{?zOWQylhODjxNNJD!vlX(o9zl2;|oNN z*C4%)v&VTcY(bUF#Li*vd~O25GP;`m3*!6cq2Ua>1iGt(W0`-#75u$-BQ#bA>$p*+ zVIM2;PF>bXoTBbC!a(C(DXG$O zT=&*z#CTXquq8G?9GYC&)lrQ|kWf#k?TEuYdP3E{w;JT~b%|u#zEbIByb8`yXaM9_ z;g;vmbkreF13G_<@x@TxMXSCscVAKi$QS5b?$6%vtzS)~(Al)^ka5OmVR#@Gde79# z9rTAFn1(jU#aLr2!qgVxkrIVHS8ZgOIO1(vmbEjl?|cI2B+E#Gz8Tp!HyI_CtyLA)>Y?cpC)?OTkH0`AE zkk#47L8C_M2mjdbPk0-H-lV-AyizKX(mmAD+$FRXHVK9+q-&~uJbe5?#xF6=RvR3f zEcKS$in!EX$%ljpc4+GrQo;_e@Y|?4XJzN!#N)u$)~O(=fDkTMQ&RxonM+RE*$yE#d)~+F+sbQmz=ZEtqf{itkN&na-`A1&T7=kYlcL6@+Y!U_oP18Q zvBrOkNVF9>M8X6Tyb9*hkbkAko6g z(L4g|WhhR{OdIIm8-N?_=Hn1L_T<_o_o;v3(uw%yHI+4O%P*wNi!1aTm#%ui!FRi7 zs-30d4>m^N=62cQ+s|d3TJFQGLMdr>q_G=&1;ECh#yf1?`v}XHfRmvPlFzZoI1Zwj zpRekDZv$jz;DT}68{x$=ol!DU$aNM^a>LVZ@rxh+>WKoKQe&Rz$kK&hHr_XPOypMU#k+!-wj%YB2q9m@*js;Yl;l>seY&6;U^Rxnv>u4=0&49L$zV+=05Z^aj)?j@cOP{rtz60#Gcgy4K-ajgWu0iCrXI zMPu(W!Ad^g*%AJROCg_;hVLSc^A*tQe_QWD(#`?SyI>fv#pY(?_g=Fp@Zri^=Pqd+ zRUDOTcJkoRM55c5^+EFq<#y4*eJDTkc}NQ45pGLWZL$_>UXofSye@Yz+6g<3q&B37 z6oTmjS|aD=_9&Tmjkq+vl;FQROr_il)$`U;M3rq4S z;HdE#F`gk?c*U|Er)DIh6P2lRW?>$n=J{ZHH1ZTIj5MRW}&%E=)cJ~jT&svz-p=ah(xKx=;$J#c}YyR;fx zg)JDTqw%aU4PzvyOSNZDYxeYd=8S`Ichf zCDvFjX%%JLn|86wxQV8}QsO_yHmX#XDW&8w%!}6>shGxPK6v21=RA1$?Do%Cp0Vb` z1VGZ}&Y!)s{G|<6+Dd=cb6~xkm?m^kyA(%bdg1Dq|HzA$u5dVCsJ2ZH5ny4G?{M$Z zvevM8?Wrt#;RqUnNYs>d0O-o!Sv^PgroU5vGM~oIRbj> zNII^8{Kq0I5{&s_oci^B=hh_1Lk>e;yvb<1hEfvB$p?`~a&WY-a%Ald`=?2Q>^+Op zI-x$aygcE_eYNPiDdT?8N@fNL_+`siZj4`8R`dv*uhoAPj=9e`n5@5Xx1{+QAKvhn zVg4*MR}w4`2S_zWxyJRqu0iJcTeRpyJ6F3M zmMn$iWZ!>}_+;4v&*S;F{D*!vz(m!f)=d(Vc+DOyO(1{9EG?{66Fk#^7y(%|N>L}x zs??@iEm=>iE7Gs$7Po176D;DrZW5nqrT%o*eBLTBZ@Zy4?dV^IR{m72!E9DXhc0;A z4nEsw?F1X>BlLs6*_ai^Y1jqA?wdxt>A$xinhgs< zuvEX-q22_6xnW*ZlpUw!>&+IR0F*3*YALS6b#TnKEIKHaSGdm_^5F@qR1~=(oyFMl zTt=P)I`CQZ$6;;<#Y1i@>jC*OKb%MQzm8K^=#7ps|(fL9FXSEm_H^lo+(65W!z8%@xg?Yk%jgvrto;%1MK%b zmWAA`s(-LUO5uaI7bH;;EtuiVHO1|R>H1%z!x&)9htPj|a3f zYvoCiVuCD@Y^^K)Y?3%-sW5SjQC?&p)dV}hr8-yHJWScLY1zrXGwGw%LC$}aK}O4+ ze|2vY7vA`-t}Q7HZChxa58Dhb@LI<%UlX0EifEs&cZM%9NA>N+O}up3y|7bmkUVs% zGKP2QwvzXFRtwVmR;S*rU5;aN-}h`Et+VUhH3AF2+%&_b874!=@hCazT5MqS&BvK; z+5(6zq%+<5qe{9u2gm_ZIS+0+}h#;Uf|2=xQx$E_mjt%B-eo3&)nO0_{GioJ^gr!C7@!#7CrL zTw}iq3INF|=iP<=LY+EF_`<6WxbqObM3G#-2-&Z#ak@)U35*IL8E$`PA)(ArlSE)D zo^dRZ4qvN&v1va0wux^UYC`oab$#HNyKd`<9E2q#;*&2Gv~5dclQ-b-GpA;ov~}_! zM|HfI9mvN+`hIuw8WY_@$F8QV*~00D2Snq<+-7TGx6^7#UKj<7x+VHNBrIF9SENHx z5V8Gn~8pOG`si{KHi~&@Z>wVi`L9F zcf@b1cH=lz>FF;CGW9TuZ)=0vC9LX;Vb^5j;lYWW{n|*ZE>3@R!$Q$(T)lE%UljuD zd(VBYB;M&3eO_(qn#@$0GE4is{H^PTMZ3rtMh^vGx!R0(G zO^c;0m#irIHUGrK9P@EA4QQ^uwfaxsXWT8%yt$ zxz7wWZNQTX1?9x;T7Yml*aSJ>RG+dM%wl!^nniCiR&@I=!Vx_E{DBOT%TR>t}<&LaG-ce1;v{5-Eka zGgBzSMOuI0E2zXY0s#Up;job&q+S!p$$FAYCi8;7IHp+7AKBdX&=%|`@5}}q_IA6c*wW{AMDK-N^#{BZ! ztWBp-Xx!5dhcI70N;Yxb?*ybKImb|b;jE_99&Ue&xx1m!hzTvp<52zA?)rt+w@!5f z_s6~Y(Es=WJ!Va|=&YE5G{a=H{7sAF(~Dbd>asV8vHiE_rv7Fq*I;`1OKyZ|ed3G8 zO}Z*%wc^0RhB{nc0hJNkFOsoi>4y|;a0%lbUJ z^bdb%XGlDu($ka~pc>q^dr>}|y+WKIQ%P6$6-+cMXp^*K^c;^zPe$FG#B*DpGPh+0 zoM>0)Yr5^^Bw0yz-$inmdy68bHbk8y`gXmH1D}@*{|x zwe73juSq3j+B7_2P!EOFbN>NJH&nlv$IlY%!AL)AJ|*}csC`W-+wmArNS|*}ZCA?( zs-cmraaVS|eZ((VwU#)7_c{Azz+HMAt#F_$`~z0%lj9>WCd%OshB7XGkl-;hZmWL5rh(tR(hi$sy{D=_~;CC zJMWF|zFC)j^CHeQkRY%*%Qdi+R_X~&TJl0LyhCX&dKFV~{Zn$+O3qwWxPpIv<2IUE zt`MTgXT{C-byZ6B;uwm;}13rqOcS}yC7TG5y!x5!Dayz#aJv(9#Hx`5Wx=)YeV zA7A;q6MbuN+pAIPu#RhMdp5WNoRhI^^d094hGDpmo!^k(OGv7!i_ z_(n$IwDQ2%yEf~3CVfe#ca_!J2vZm%5k){`$319uZJ|{8NI2%=p?wu(nna3l={Cp)lmn*QE>%4zMxa?q!f^i68 z2Y6~B6nVjG9gF>#oGY!LdefPdD~!6jw1_w&lB7z!?Q3HSvV?)to5nq)u09+Gn|2qC zJhkR`PzWS}?c_v8JR&DkZ4)2_=86OUd&5n08c=$zw~q` zOPs?RQ&itzyj&FVc`OOkY|8X32wO^t56s79EVpG0?m+?~2*NGCf@{N8R}2iiOd2ZR zu*db`zxs)VI9pqmt71~oFcv??d~hI1@izhao#dA(umbBc`Y%<*ZnaQp zY;o9!^(<9c9D?xz*At3roi@aws&j?Z`tqx>i4vjJ0g#1{Ga0l>JQcwwt*uYL)MXlXs}t!JzB7E zK;1)yM$_$Db@l~q)N3ErNm*v<{&ents9~}7x!g9n=6Y=NVLT;&Zw4>1W?S0U1EkIG z=RPUA5ZZ=m#jX5flA@UnIdt`zsfF^*;+c~XS3NbZD=rUz%5#7kWrog;C=T}TaI_4RR-EHCw zuh_q&ILJkbs808g0*ybf35JE=Mw(vMeS7n=K}0Xq+lEoKYHD zZC4~%Z1vs&Qo1>B zZPNdBx+{H#c!l2N*=hF6?ruFi0IP^ks1q=ywjU3@6579iWdm;iN)Z%iPt;y!WHR_= z>0Nx+f@?cx(CP1OW6=5Y-;BeCE>wf56*x_zY)BaC&R83%4!4h*6ucf?|cV4XC%dj9SZC z_Btp*FBBku^BcBZ&=@w1VWgbJRyn6W{AMvSq{ocVCpKfH~ zk()Aq#JGsnP$Q66bNF(Bu=^yMtBe6WhmU_e+d1(tmqidQwkx?^-*oO~Q^%*Dw*lQYP4cy49#}-S<=psKBO|!6@`sFAsqsZNgz= zZfUb1G^F?h!vM?g9{m1#s$Fhx$v4?YFL`jCEh=uwWU~p3fT&nYOsqwx4DvaK)kHe?sy!YMED0nf1#Dg z^#mxMM!0%GdXiMXCrXoVDAgaLPVsI@t6QGMuhUCU3h{cX~%0}Ku9D!X-!q2e68vX03Z^M&JEnd}c}dRy7RK({ zv+vh(I6YCZ_=7%XcyAd7@D*>T)wBeOnG4k9mam$50HxYCPRN#e6xHXH6+AdJndi;Z zL*vCGkWBu;E`u!AymJ3Z8)CP+E;7 z9!QC}7vyS|YQ3o+jV^4F?uyQhuvNwgfCkJq-J9I4cUIP;}^MkSvZ;xKHJwUInARrr>$3K?Bw+N?vvFfw%p#@(PBmGf;RoM=cwGI#d-nX z<&Pt>VH7@x>x?D0_?<(40JEEbvv^vcELcnJC8dC6+ggccmBJ`D1%nvlcSeC?Z>fyJ ze%>2^di>~;Cf|>QDtJOB(2(u{%^thtG)vKTA@SI}GZG1?+GTSmxOG%E=-7eb>irWR zgU=&#(F~Q%y7Vg0R@I+TK)@{(%6$*-qkKKR#LlZ!EhfNF$ z)}A{$o4e&a4fHz`X-Q3!cU}&Fnb$QfS5`69cT9VKLThxD4`TbUbCO-XP3C6Nz;ZZ) zKeXyTr7Gub)yrdloVc=a{W5cIRNgSPZtixKMr8TJ9w4p`?2~kXWL2XA#5$^8z15 zTVeAWLoy~nU;eSUKHJwrIC)T?idMncw%cRoGxKRSOjCY;{W$F6>Y1h~p%3tsT?4S@ z;TyA)Zg)5IYdImG8?r<4v%mp5^WImI16%(I#Ep>1UOILEJrmLX5#=HMZL~CTnE5%m zq`z5)jpEwvnFK^l7*A?4xUIPBh!@!Lf}3)YU2m&B^5b-(8DZ#OJP!9fQ2uXgOcCX2 zpg!oy*mydBW(Oj_E4d3Xaiiyn-Nj-Uk!4tzpWz2!Bh=L*TP0S)I22oyz0_IjlU5S$ z0!mCC$Arym7+k@plUIFQ_XlcSeW2<=h;yyW6LrE$@ z2dYFq&El$4^go?H{_rq#-gQEa@h71IXY;f&K0~#C+st5AtY>@U({!$jy>mKGHYgP< z39_ixw#av*o?vLjmXCOP{#*rqko>ZH4ZUqiir_CEhDuG8S@}Wxo2RWmo=u*8UTiY%T|Xe4RD%4GLm#SC;sg^rOq%Qu!SfG}yo3tJb2I+0 ziva?Ep_2!XbtkkdBeZKj(M3Cy?k*aQ^t<{V>`jcqgrbnlLzck+F=>bxy0Jx8FWYaG z#g>H)t*w1|C?r~Ad&R_T#0dfHUK39-TJ2| za!Z>2oW={~^v27{h6Tmkf|a`w-u=fJ3?#Qd8h%M+sgwR&;EN076&#b?JKc`8|d zTG0RZk3;}`dK-br1u4+bu~~{xsIa%&XOW6>75jNyM00OXP2@1!^vMFs>g`GDb{%_; zYL8V1S+82`zLNlE14F}%n+g7>=GQRgcS4O!baH(iW2Q;TF9kr^`oWbXRey4iQ^@kGGw>EHDqZ8-%E`F^|ZfMcu&$kl_ z&;wqMSOHsSW+Z{wm9GRzMf-^OmF7>5R~ru}`ZwiV0g;gJCza%r%oCgV=H4sY9oA8Z zc1m(ZF1utTK6lHRt%-k{>wfd2UD7BJVzL%iDH~U*_%(iKEjVt@zDszmADB>o+y0d+ z*k&hOG{uHUGe@OgUStILFwQ!v{PfwSt zKrp)Pj5!sJt+8?pRp!#m>L{XrRL^mGAJ^F_rN54G6Gkj=W^oFAii~2I+KeOx9ji~t{GeP_cDb{Eti zI6a+6KeUU|@%ehIVvNFmxyh#K6?S;l*OwQW-;@4_nC3pOi!{(3;}}VQ6&WQ&a=c=gY0;2>cn(Z$c@9=-0$XPU?7D`)QxsuCyT zQx1yNXTpi~W<^zRH<^ieo`QIn+_HoLVcTu5Zi$KbUgm)*ve&jy>8d%G??{p$n=Iu+ z8eiS?yycYTr%5NYLEJp_h((NemVb}l$ zKp|{Dmj!eMF}yh-YF8hwIQhEEU3{pzEM8P^2VuY3{l>a!%1_L=q;}lBpW|5Vf^05JVZV*Ox1XRGg(><3|*E2EH0gNUu`#0B z?thOS6r~QtcUfm;sEk{GAD08zf0A`X3S$a!$R65UZUd_U)q^;azua}j{Jod1o*(Ko zy5N!uyW!jpmNY7V(%FjF_vuDC1DT53u74{CB#9=OxMjuu9eki$i$?Y>+|Q(BA*> zRHD@%h%Ia+t!*;wbfoYBt8-i3HV*BzkBN@h*1*4CPOPKN91OrMdALslY1n5vDQKQ` z3bP<<#C(_}sAmh=&C(n?cpUEeN9N+|IJzJ)OJx1q^wm6nEr?~u(}#ZL!m0g7yPby3 zRoyla>e_pgE%7EFw(<)8ki=>v7XHd8=q-(FoMnsYtCB9CF)g#cS7~8eKo|)rO)gkA zOAN(AX0kicf<}{LnpEIMvNoH7szX(D%aw4E_Ru$-_w2nzzh zmXHt2Il(rK3q_Zf^q}4JU;n&HW%W%Jqxt`+dzT$avNJvKRUBGdR;wFm z%uE!21_e%$J>sAwb~o7%VBu~NX(e;>pqX1JQ>)%;JzEJNdP9~5kT$)W-6ZBk@=50W z-}m3nF^?n(2%bF)vN9t4YIe?l{>yjisxGd>@Rd%ko9{YQDxKM%hqEm1x2D@`F9vxI z>&Zm7^)#3!MWnQj2m8CN7h}wvU|`ZBY?^g{^^?NJud2etaTipW%BnvSp1bI=R$ZE8 zXT1r%OP6O9BfW-|y)-cLV_s+~MhgKBFmcjq0v9oa1nt}?8}Twf$L*rfO~sEp4vnK` zf?`X@?+Gn(lW)|il^z{;Z{6romFB+$0Sg3Z(bmn?xFJcz7*OK zjLX+jZH!(A4^^N(OFP??1!S8|Y@NA8b7nf2R6SQ1g1TN@NDV!f8~eCyT68rhJ3n$W&!$3Bu7e4=p z!rv@4NcuR5L?b*FaNb~l?U-Dz{10`}IM0_O(9*a!K=t{;tPn~2`fiU~9J2qK3c}PW zU#F>cMT1v$WaZmAKhYWqeH&=*NKBLfHtUG*q@C(u`f{t5BYB*ghI{#fW-9PHtQ836 zOLS=g)nBhve2Am4T;g)Ef&wx1R0(qk1_&tDKO{BvhFQGot)5=|Nz`2csZu>o{2rAS`ukP9A9n?$?=zQvVm7(Njv@=-fzThJ4-CrMkY@VbgNn zup-whca2`?K2yDQoME|xA%YY_DWPHN&o~C{1m)q5=GBj?PMPjo5}<)7!N^vPOaMBS zs{Qo)iv$o=E~^uN6p<;KF0<*Eom4KHVxQ_dKQs>lje1Ocas{82GZh_YUNqGfGN;=5 zl3kW(G0?GL83h6-&a3C0o8xeJyigBN>Sd-!lr}q4bNa^aM6zV8oci??N@Fj$^M$)P zv~XR>w&c>q!ikvESG@;nc-8wh@kFk#2YbTCDRJ$EmnC$6j-Q591jHkvZ}}u8=~7nh zWubg!^)i0kN$f0T!tP}<$ajP<(`jhRbX#ap(UUC#tTPVN&?Y;v%_i+W*zpQBKJV{rdY~{cXp8{PKJJa)5r+f9@xVTnxdV|M9;duu)<-nb_NlRgGYTkUwDoSI2w(LFmaiUn`Ew zLtq}Te?;@L^EqrBxt+p^u45?tBYGotn3kyp9i9r&IR&;!ECz^130(@tmR_^%&L!06 z(`pohI9OsRsK-lg4gDa2Gg9rU)geBRP`jE(Ww`c#aQqU;$f%d^ID|d22ubvgYK>zf zb&qua!_ux-^;f0SD?9n7u1$6BR^uDhl11BtP$-;<^N4FCou}&%vPnL;l92RVV(beW zf4Md7=O)eB_4M>pGt*DKag+;N4`p9r@{ph_rbPBZ6_ZjLQ&m3oe&I?OR_Z~vy~mY^ zs*-Sjj{i|6&XdX~FtRYYpYm((pZ^LG8VgszvYEo|7oH6oww>?oq#ZAUMfBxY=$|D; z;pQyqvDBOIOVT|v?$#kU5AUlB^g5y_x2Va(?leYrruK?Co;1l~vNJLn-W*zlOKX|R z@i@F(heZif)vLHOjJqobW>vNRZ2(ev;h@2PK7R14()v}^#d&AhKNrS0BwErfA;{V$ zD;2u0?cc&?EdMr*Kpf0se`{#Z(oq%ZkLz7$e7{oTO*Wz5@RGg7a9v4F=CuB0>gQVw zy*wdyhJ~3qKMKSszz*k<2E1GX+dx{E2F{Y8m|eU!PY8o7Z$dm1+DvZr8%hR72usp` zb9*ZrsF3=z+&NNDAw`{!wcnSrT{tPAG*920W7)el)!`MkXm`DkdR}9E|KV6Jo|~tt zmZ|VfI);R%p=T!YBFY~m#E5VlfcCR3c5_@DwCQbSu=fGIM!GHc*Z|MFTF0=~wXCs~ z2pa%3GapeGnptBi`UT@c3<#QN<%Yd~8lq|%Ul)D=mXucUy$k}Y8qlS~%i*>Bb>>ZN zAoXlxN#xk07SiJ4i>5Y~EQ-mBuY>6gJ+9B@U}BojES^%d$+k0Jiz=n~Fk9~7`sdtD zrq09E;O42i=^lwQxH&SIE%7$Q9J3e>b}3)Y#fv1M0HYJ9#mx zjsy<~Yw6@<>p^8UsYV2u?xY5-11V<%%fb#rv4h`W)2PU~Q3-a>$d6G{F-7h;6$-%# zN5KWfTNhm=Ck7vnX`^#>8fOk!oCM!3Y6e^fY0Ho1CqS9KS$lb!69;xctuGbkXdAi& zka4=eNectc&{{5^*qSVZ>80R*NdM;WGZ4__^U~TxTZO!`g^2LJ+K)PB z%d?Kj=iv&+m&wN$go0u2J8X=aj`w1{Os|%}S0mau z;LCnU8qjR|UFNiZMbjK0)QhYWb;ba~>h__*-6h&O*rh7+^bd>57sK>WG?iPH{fQeQQF^FWYryO^q=~43^u?xIzB0$NcykN;`Ui)RV*$`52=}D-0j(}uZq*R^c)KZwl zp0`g|L0WA;1VcwsYeaAz&ehN2=)mO&w2xLwVi^HnUPb|YSwc1>{rIf+-T`fLbYiAl z^7V;ZF|LSwJ-PWneorQV$`&ZZ(J>5B_j*s+B|#E@{RLr8eB0NG3u~q+Cv%Bz! zv#9!Cqm$^>uhV!k5QJ{*93dj{lGCzRDX306U`ALuZ`V|J>LFN#1{r21Ab)dP*Te}h zFKy?nY7n<0!>vqez1XN0-RPmaGSS)xk&@Mk`kNq}9`yQbAY zH_gs}Zhs%G6+`6%76G)&aqfVEokdj%#R|ci!Uy`JF4na6JPqkaDZD<`nx8mt^nT`X zHz+8%N{%=0bhyy4(a`_qB9m7GSUD zQvP@oV86)_Q_dn_5#7xW3)(e$nBoLAoWG@ixz3@q@blYD6ja)hz`w1KZA3N*Dc`*_ zIu3P1=TCv%TZgyRJFXjut_WsY9G2+ZamW0fr{QMI|aB5JdIkKi{6QfkC4nh;4Kf<;=v^ItzD}UXKgA}ITGZ5 zmU7IHUQ(^NCS_mRaGU;LRHYpyIxgBJBAY!x9K%(E^I{mbA>4M2GUt%ndnR&!({I;| z0Ml#JRmE>Bl!%56yLG8q=jp&LftfEPB$c+}sN5%m(Ymde8h7DD3p`At{T3%rXNL25 z?NxuY_|@g5=TG}{keYRN2&&(IgS!9l5VXG$HIF`pPAY-F)xXAuhWmq}4&O57 zfR>0Nt!uIKJOt`e>Y&;Qt#()#$Qg|3L2;5gZ883E`Tr8P@@11;dh!horv=vkFTJY&r`oH!`a&zvOr9ink;LlHd7Cl2xZhF- z0pG^E?A#72;ewgVKyO1>&6eLz@_vM|t%swnd%#&zb#T=<)6q{**tOXcgAe;GzqO0^dnH8tbvNRMqj*>Ti5Z@B( z#GD2z0Kq?6%8r|iM*v?=)yL)}?FlMcvNE7r6=OahGU_#O#~H-)`hJ zxn&ELY|^;lagpXK7=s(Fx7mnUt{3d4|iszFLsuJuMyMQBPBVBTc z%Pce(#9Vsbro-c~UPfK4F7Qy7`Z5Yy?~SQThiqjAY{%{AuvMggorp<0)if|!P{7~b zmscGWTwZL|Ls$3K4+iEk{7RB5X7z^p=ITqn@#xtb?b>ibvV-CJ2dBFvH+%E*eiDef}_9OvN4{Iah7l2@^f=ql!B6;EmvrJFKH<27~N(=z?l>oQsm zDvgT^lBTR|s(%zGjz6rX&4!XB@a+j|E#Twj@@UE_Df1GeCvb49UytYd1lE#!PF7+5!QRobR26?++9&}hgu2+)drQNff z)sCJTy%-Ye*(|5=((Co+yu(U7~D4ESc?BIu4-2*&nq38CB`7D z9!-b&dSt`ueMb2z60<(Al%Y4SWimoIHNKWX?_r#{erx)$Hq)C!5U zb@}$1jB~I`wah2si_4SahEjWqKt1yd|1x0bmd6q_2cA#wuu~?{W zbky{JdA>B9A~MSK{iKpQd2OD2>F5RchSah|lX*PqfU=3hY4s^8PP znqS)UxLDYP%rN5!Oltu95xrEK2TQ@X_KMWS_op68Bw<++MW$hfjlrBfzGBUF+NC%S zzNn9sisd~U?cOC(;*2rCT$q?wZA)z__0TSVxVjD+Wj*3sGCq!L*OsiSwH$Ln$M`&5 zR98_nN7Y3jpHQ7QFQ?g4q6kjhI`!osB%}73Z*}thGxbn`}60$Yi{EWlJR@fVW$(5B9HRumh@=TNG)03 z>e3-+H!sjJf(o+bg}UsN4)P9@(ygC=rpr;Oj2Yl9@`PPl-0Hls|56n?BB8Vt<^Z|F z@`H;Fju1(=7|?(EJsyECQ;R!<3T|AR?(kG=k9qHI z_h4TWsA||LO@6rj5r#$9GL@eQmz3Vc^(BTYU@a8f9D?EEg=WGA>oiG%K(;=A`qq-d z%G6>GEh*zyoU`x65YIzoy{0Bp)uM66lOg~t4D$qjku@kP-^TlH>yqZ&sJLlUMx{hE zBAsLAhyJ^Cr+jjiFnZ6p!2&JfQ4-v^+QuvCO$yMlQmQ3gfm)m3vS)~Y)S zPh4#Z)b>#ykNGDc>PD(W+>RN4wuWr&Ej7Z2JgTZK!WVbCI2O+sFfOtRwfx7do3uZp zrU=YzL1-yAhr%~4n;)$XJ=5NKbB3tbd3+uEEzSlL^LsH9B~!@jAUji@+Vd$;Ci-z=rLnv|=w+qJ9PknNVQEQBAb>vag1Jml~a}In{OD zqf_LmCYc9MV1r9@iwG@5mJsKrj+lV z0Pgfjg?P56ftI8EYTG=So;+0A6WC<^(QtXtN5U==ma-5TAo18KA zFD~zrW4vk9aeJSfwU&h+v>w*{oN{MFS&Z8_#ONB(Khvjr?A4!t)uwbDE+@?<4$#ut zLN5xEGHz{v8(GiA2Ik=yG!icAO+Ihh=!8Ud~Yf=TJwNzFLTpF$3zV zzCviI2z!APuzjb(HI>?agY0Gwl5`4W0KDdaIMyF`cS0C{zP24c{c=+6tKJpR)q!pY zuY#>1+8?Oute4fj86H$U7Q>*LZEJJxj%%31nG+EFt|G31gE9M_$I#D-%5XXLrb*Cc z1Wzp)85LDi^ij5Tn?n2!nI5BaYAKqZBhxb5`G(<>*W~MY@A2X0Y^36vQU4hSM>X=h zj34A~JNRLLKMTnS+qXs!G2v?tQTby@(TK43If-}Kv?LPUuu0^7IN7V){JX~f?e4Vo z>HQa1#X>7ot3UNG$vPl&9_n$?B3=g1;}FJFdM9*dmB}ma)+RKI*YUIk<%nDOV_7*k zXc2x^Phnlww(UGiV3_*do|X#2jrneD>@zks=;2&{lHiz%I*ScAEX_Af*I$?*f@P!E z%e4=YzqI09%HnhON2080EQ4*yM@8%b@z6y91b>l|8fdOjLgtlkq6zZlc`$6}@K}D6VR$oTBZr6S}-I>eveS{3}qs1&xjm$eV>rYYqymsaSL>aYP!+#Az>_EdSvR)88wS5|8$HX{X{*7rLsmnJhY zq1WxpLWJNV^lEqaSw&_>HD}W#*|&Y?-M+GZ72A)S)WN#8>`~U_{uSwMA=Sc=Am0QE zx{SRa5Jn9>t?E*7dsV?%FbjQ&8N3? zwiZfov7qP9E(vDc)DCtb+doj^J5}Ko89p(r)M;0K0}x#nk?xF^9Bv(^veOr*0&9cx zbLDv!mvrA}+|AN?+BQp}PJ#9_j%$(#AMm`6R?00^ z<)*aM@X1sBJ-ChcGqw9=JD0Ou7qW&&S7oS1^c3NeCww)ZRJ*lwu9z*OF568~=T_F^ zA7&jAQGsQf9gcV?w-x<7w6IJ=iirA?>&l@V)9a0{@1QtTjz%#OE1zG##B2z4^@i*zQ*R6aZpMP;V}peE+fUnOq$#}kkLy-4GpZe_R)iYj;P&bXzy;a#Vjr|^ zbLy3{mPViTVQ_oCn}RNX3RfFYF1uwI!%wYFsIrPsR(4+M;QLW?5pl<(hv~mP*mS3X*L6E5JWt|=8zwes_+2#{5M8Ux zO0!s=s^8Zg5!1T#0122mkolY78JwMvhx0a57pHZInNnatKeZBnTBLj401JEte0>rM z-CE3;o4RstxA7%q-^^4A2oJ5aU6Rz8#HQ$nUuv7#JSG8ZwMx=v*~YImLFCJF8s~mA z707%wD+rsbNVs*W)F>a<5DxeD9&*api!P44Y7J&!h+(u~JH>X$q~Styxzw!l%cf%Z z^=vdCd7L>W0<86`Pa1q+28~6Jk`s<7&+-|oV1=|+9t@a z8R}4iI53GG8n`*H5r7C#mh|~0N#CH`-;z?c8!OG{Xy|f(-Z$+g$K5jSX2HMFTF06= z^pm8#*Y{@~iTm_<_%MLqUA}8@VvtvtI?D+NuO;fgyh#2k2+gE}Da-I@=l(xhMXK&+ za^4)Me5iEs5}!?5)5dg<+p~9hBvCnDJ7spR1VCTI7fsUwuJ+VOHa8bG#2751YmRc; z2PcT+pZ?o_tcu$w4&gbS&*+15zx;M{wSV0;NYYF0@TlFPXW;^MCd)?U51->6Z#*ZB zeojN(sak1AZdL6Q$ZozbRh`N(B~sm^oD7d-H@nR@@qvjC)oixGZ2E{lG?fxBP&P#5 z#hgRZN1E@-Wcq%<(h0fGbSfqFy4%dAn!Es=Rdif`ZjZ`H7Cza82{-aOuA!Wm?om5A zs*_^lq#)j9pH?kF*@;yER(5)E?n;+XUW&3Hw2-n3jxotCXB@JM1lF7TWF>0N>R<>C z1q)B8Gx;fs)hRGq-jMO-5E_7nRh%m4^Zdw^jlGc~-&YVgO~p&7XJE8&ZaN@R^4PZT zx06VJ;n-=W&U0W{*^D#+lJ)Oqgr~lt_?NtBgvW^u0W*HiNY#L3R-jRDJe1um2NMi# z=t-h?wK=2`mY=O9d?Hcx#u54vci>mv(adz%XjV92e!ZQ__;= zL93{2%nRi0rC3Mpu0x{4Rut{UxupN)3$HhZ+i$p}CqUZJj5@1a1S*PV=MMF^ZP6cp z^O*JSo|?Y#^9}xkegU!Pv4m93tqqiA3nxmb2b&{W10&h4G?NYMUF+RQy=#d!o6O=J z_q)%2Q~Ezu>n7V_>QP$*+H}z*Sp4v4`>lEe33zy`7^68%?u{%GGv?fbih=eXq?)3Ikw7^<7d)?bi zT$a44O9`@y@WPy@p*Q^7YB(ZA)z!GRib&cNk6$6y>c%dSBi|fg_U&D=Xp*7hXDQ7R z4&b+&ziClP4wd);5j?c%cr--t{^-eYJidmi(qKOblJzpT5$@iE)-QB#7*-E|+L!}` zI;(e;l<*Zn^ub2E0NAMq!0rw;c%9}HNxM_W3C)u&j&$i79z?mgRzj=iJcsY@nAb`4 znfvMEy5p1X^j(z-KVGxpt{cp-e*wwha(z`FfM3<7Ssi}%VtP=eJ(zJo&iSUYWg>Uj zu#u|4cr%uFiWr$y1X&kpx&E7fD!R|Ptut9?&UqiOow&&ps@S;?rd6%2aGz{TwTLmm zqLGW1+s7N62+cSrfra74yr3}6A9}~@5<2V4>NQTfRmu+_G|Bvwlp|0tFLjIVS`SIN zQYD92p2yb<6$ect>vf18$K`l*nf9C+&`>h&^BylgsoM~2(3M*GU6`hs#M>~3T3 zX#E*7Xj4Cj7Ugk&m+zkGSAn(N*|bm9b0JyQ^=}3A(BF{u<}A4V#VE8VG+gz~*1>Eu z*pvdp2e#Wu8_PX^!_!VhoDqoAX50(29(Kf=;-1zdY_~clYwc(=H_So2oTzH?1nvRr1MjrGvpL>-7;PAy4Dc7Lez{0`T*< z?)W(^OQz|w!yC6*Su#hJY*7-Cd4^G{Wze%xArW56q>f2{nvp3`FrHS{a4+3(sC87k ziR4T<3(F;}Vy|ry1)0D9cv|%0X}~qCwQVzo3(m-08NNknMF_O@A!unL{ISm~9U@xLMbQ zc_H6(%40Bp@#?PlQ2e?xR@_0jx49lpSF?UJjQ)q-hR~%p*#&l;uIg)}X4fp*XiKFq zCzle(v8s)UvI+mYvOTG<{lhNi=-$zxs?3MJtwTpnNxm37R>iHkOAb{A6>J51*=@9y zB2VO-B3dw-5wW|AGmZ3TR>DgHO~4dYNGcIO8`oTaDkrE|Oj{)#Gb0S1{Xx!2hh{C) zcRRPcA#~7!#gn1Lj?0TKXGm6*bs-Nf9}X1)8h_Hk898@-Wu#b%GWNiz?e;i9SeDK0 z%4h%D=8HF9x!xP~k)r8MvnFmV@H^8_@Evp-BlY8x(V;4d*mB`aXjho_p~+6^~0#4%nmiHT%*F-7ETR)e)+R zj6%;=KSTMa*KLCPm@b%VQ%S-;*lFZK8OQX~0&K!bc@8 zEa86@+2z=6{qyspJRYXvTV&xnz10^v>OQSfN>uN<4bsk5+yn6oUyURZYY7`#1A;K_ zt#%2@#@o>+I@S2<8NZQF56HsFYLI+?Jzo`gw|MtRTKSjxS@wFMtF3R7t;n>`}CKFYO1B~m#u=~=5sEsF@%yLA{svma}SJ%9Z#Zt|5U zUMFBz$LAKdPUxM2yfJDJyhQc|C|jr-yD@-k_$S)$x~>Vy1v+1S2o zoe+^a{Z@NoO;ar`Vej65n%(vWjJ&>O`Mzl;SFv#_SbSx5-GDzx(MYtmS_vwDU)3fE zB^Yh|sH|~lvqHs`P~A$Awd~-DD5aY_lm~t2Oz3_Df@63+On+E)O8#(CJ3yEeNpWg^V+UR@x=TggO9vc(*)J1NprBuEIJL)iT%d~ zTV!UhRcd)x=`<+vvV2)V!E!>Rd9m~IkxXKv%QB3Y7bR{vZucW-WSf=jiq zRq-uF{N;O%zE*XwPj&iQ9m`pZ_#W*L+N&dh~Ls}IQ(%dTo=YV~Iy zG5s+|e={ns4aLD`J1ET>G>6(5O}=;sRP6hz!))X!;AoB36F=of}raP<~RkZ$0b) zTRP{t4jvD1_AlkON>t$JYO9Nwyu0BW4WqjRm(tLG-_-c~?hZ|YOQc@jKo%uF$;syBjC-x;al3-UHPn)P+8gD{zz%>GH3~v%d4ne^bj@DoyrH^Hk$9$z|hU50j&JMa{wrZ1s(^#(5ZU4WV7O(fn#rjwCZ!$!tzy( z_Xc;^GdhIRWgkynq_-}X>QLH|+=g5(>rI7!+C+sqxZ_p-rPiWo1OYf-PBR*~;|q(fjFD=9`z`8Siz}X!7rY|qf80J?du}_SBBxe@VKGsbsg6aS$S2RP zkz~2~)GP2#Gdi%BO_2t?4Mr9y5S@Goq{QY*+@)G052WYU^saMX9xQBv zETuoU;r<;XmUN6GMksGXs|v6lMq+>${?|x>*;onj!i3Ba9i?w{c(a|uwsvc^8ckqW ztKbkkE4oyA1j0b+O~s}jRG(7z%1X%s+5$ysUjQfx7%f8=lMo$ zb*nqoWW3chs2s5-Yc65jsP#`}Rg^1#u2?pay|c+;W!_-$T0OcHwkao7mjC<~fhH+c3SZECLE&5d-bx-R7if!3Z6 z1@#?_pQVjqk}x;HsG6)H`H{e`*8v)<(Pv=FOUHx6G9}!H_gdK`D)|GQ{V~@}efj zAL)5FQrzy9rEQ_W0%h6OVb*YQHh4fKWISyeK?KHZ6EpchDDj1I44=_ne^^d>l~TOHNN7&(Z|Nsuw2d5Rltv&>t8(kJ%2|s3d{2t? z2B#?YT9!WeHYrnJm3#4ak19axZz5B_!Uj7HTf~iy6N@iNIkx zHfSH0KLOZzLp0?^(Ez!29g6-bW6*{nf`k?(=6A(wTKc(5QzErUe~vzyY>n$>k}&(j zzIA;gVO}*&hWnN+SxwF3#Ow@}<%n+8_7ORTwCQU{5k1aiZ4P@@htyF$#1jQqZo$$( zHrZVcA`mh=DXX1A*l^b}b2MnYfm%7?Kt8f7TY_d;t=ECm_|Cb#-5Xqv)TB>C*J_Wi zi9ED6>iRAcJ~|1QPhe|=A+wO9M1MU(``tCNG} zBWlPNq@FgndnBwZTqAYN{%J~ffNCfkoqWj`G%Qx}1Bc$ztL^t*5@L>~c;2l%;BZcQ zI}Y`PEP6BnwL#<1IZ>mBIk?39_jZnz&-bIsXet^zn!=K(Q1xx<#kX0hYR}TT)elB1 zhH^Wl^@vmwe^5;^qk<}w#64w|9)y?| zD3)7#@u`V>Cos5(N7IGoWx;WSFkZ=@ESHjz->dI%l!N7T1)S(bOn}cw2vv6By=o3p zQsf0qf^zizeMzwp+pNnnmSXktIwDj44KTdxRjtHLe=!E_tK||^d4FP-o{8)ZZVSz) zwM(yI?aXV^ok48~5&b4syPeBNx#0RDddx;c1k2ITR`PYAXE~THv*Cc3M%wX7jvMOK zJ_=4kr5Gq*dk9?xP0-5+!j`au#?FLH5JSu9%Qouown{p^T zdfh!S4Oh4H?d*h-qhd|YoN_qcS%KSB;#Qgr9AT+8s|Tl2e=PbtxpJ|>BHPf>#6WkN zHyq|$hA(U!pEruFd6xg$Z{}>HcI+x`e?r#;bW?<~V}5e3j?Uu7r|*~%kdXatHsz8X zCm{4^$?}l^9{Gn5_O)}~@X?=sdVzPmtSL0xlP)t>0Q&-EcQ|-p5)h zYT+RK0^fq1Sn+};%|f|=V&_rHe`zYeXGCdAoKE%FM-(b$m-x`a@6nCRjK&XDYSV>f z!a!50XuG@ z=AAhR87ZzdP4>to66V~!=x5kN*p9E79jJp&(h6+FKVFsphWYBc+zvApuR zPrZ|?kM(Q%tg6`asF zD|A~+WKa6Jy*Y1)`0IUVfAR92`box4vlb?ZJ8E}33v5KTomy9i8dhM^IFW5clTvJ$ zU8pL*LT30$Abq)h`e!%H1oY9%yGXCh<5x>fiS;_}IbrICf0n=s?HK{I$j{{neiV^j ze1t2zRHof38$D20HBnud`Op-s^cCf9xx$atc5i$!1tBd4r@vAbe-8hVHoP3{qlvTQ zi;vRa)_5d&?9`vt?Qdx=%KV9Z;#wmFoRR9t@hbA!H`SIVGepnM-(QY)d)=2n zJFvXUUXdG=&gac&-IQBI1mzkNsvDG22uLu9)XcSPceBHD)aiF6t8!m0NEwO1g$i=M zdw~F?dgX4@!ol$If5Y{n1{coyKc&t_=g**2kF14fh!&}+{2O;Ptt*A%+6pnF)KhzY z*Nw?F+D7}1I956mDr#KhjRm>HJz=4-?@L9Wu038Yt(&qgfF{L$KvANYjLv zG_goTN>X3OYl|tn74LCs8}pYFY?*hI4e{xpWXyhlytIYCqpQ(FUu2WwPryIrX#4rN zxN47o)ar{5eb70N6vtBn%CchpYA8JOgB`)P}jVhn;0pDL|c)0p2ap024rN95lse z^w>|FYsr+;q+p=VbSD*JTfMQnw}sRG@}$*e_mazsFzwDqSTzU10#0an{@-B@fX3%;`hbit$yV<=d@d^ot$;@-`n2 z1O)fKV*}t;q7`PCx{;-2!S02U{ozXK0kCPtj*EoYa^K3u@9#_^`cp~xnlEYUe1pso zxo2&qe_p3MrbP7s*){AC+jgjNtWVa}-sDY(T-EBdh!R6kHmaE;TS;2E@izUNDj#=q zopZp5pb& zOj!m5(ez;ENrH*$7f44Z0GWb&dzR4FEHWZcf7W$W_utgJlA3CFrIdVt-jBvs-^$L+ zs=-il?KE-;8SGhzXjk4J>1Zm0M!g``ID@@u^cC7e|2D34HUXPYyS4}b6^~%#EPC-A z5OJWuV=Cc^0b?W0yZ2gVy{p@Vl7!i|dWGCv_8n1@GPxxZ?OsRD*=%c8uHc#^vO%J3 ze}9+dfjx9%Celm=K4*=jx?3`wAN%F`vUXLwL9B2#X>F(sR@fDMrURNxYSUGTw#pf) zA#%AL)9$4o_3=s1u0ox7%s15ME9$C{+H3+{Ryu2Re=W{m zP@sE?)wyrdWXfYHYugF8)$(~vyAb7X>*Cds;%)gm4mV!IcE>wBy7nZb8PTPw%KSK} zJml0qIi1QiVdH^N#^({E#F1RQp)+GzQYybwX1ivV58U87V8bfHESCcVuI6__e8*;Oe_++AmrD?A{fp|#0Ls`>%-DqA)ZdWED0SyMRsLOf z_b%{kGMk81I(P&p1RRQpVM6Omen{y?&=%PDDfK6n+FWLlkCdE{gj95|7P6J)!d*YU zs7h+t@{0C6<2F-zlqj`e`A7ptx9kPnvzAN6?>6QF_5ZwNU%lM4CBc-{v< zUZnDCGGtc1)+1ikyx4Y*eNJ77$8yL?;%7fzG$Dmji_o#o@kilj&?m;wVcXT?Vt=zG zU~sPYn}pOWOK9(Ef054O7lXb{y)`_rfK!%2xJJ%UT&vSU1!2I0w3o}rTeL68TI4KY zprQO?DLFf33F- zji$y`5reC9Ee6A7Xs-~b^J0z9p3S@prO@CsQgp9S8V)qNf7Q}+6S{0B3-prPWXQW; z%M#W8Ro4F?ISFLSk~c5Ud`4QB<<~!&Cr>|3qfao%PwVFsTTitWDo5Qvk1GD=FWz zf*ttgs1bak=tZzk=3@=5VD6ing;t~y?b0o5l8`oSGrt{IA}MhgCidwuHxjv}?9j`* z?cYmC)Qs-(^t6O1NXXU>AB58(TY+!|AQQN&9hFMNf6CGV^-Z2IbmiiUJk(=^5TVxw z#pOJY?(4MHUE&|NWjs|DeQI}DPNBFM{o{q?*skuBuGWBnXG1~|>uAOq3A&-LX(;)% zAhrhgxf+>2ξ#foamHmtRN&^F}ahxi03h7!PqLCS!ok=Cp)dX$xOra?K?* zD%G<>f5>f-$){-XtpQinq@q0a(|;1xK2H?7fSP;rq($TRB}&S#Dm}30MVrB4t5QDR zU}zahGSsbvM3)G2M5kDZxK}4kXm?NuRDRO|weejlgj|iM{i6`sx|>h|X4w%uT1W7O z2(ub9m#v*jo(c&(ZGJpJ5UxBHJn~r+HEphtf9PV<(k|k&B!QZb%`#JHzphI2^kj5W zPHA*&$h=`4)TS%QCx!fNGafX?mX&DOt!1hHcH1YuUjv|89rcwOCia?(tOAbo({bu~ zy8n=hgB7doTHMT^vFi@!L7B05LL)wkld>u zf2|`G6STkppOWbB4|Qr~#qk`oY5)2jKP(Go#%V3B$*iq3;Y7=_jm>d{4W?Bf^I;TN zC|Dx)@bFHOPOm@~xhs`cp#t##{(VnKCGu0bF#sDV&Pg&L2q=0Upy4kxpEybkn73Bs zDY)2tPAY8y*q#PTheQ(dL+%pslCW7=e~*Mx6t3q=`qX*{+?l=|GRJT9k-)s_4b8BX zJbUSHWFk$aemG8}VQ+Wv4NFdR!M4pNw)0$-%GEBGQD`;4lyqgX7OYr`3c5@S;6jX_SF_})a>r!Q!iknw+BlgX<9zL?ck<&=CjIKC) z)qxJchcp0vHFlbR^c#w@VYB$*DZ~Gm0+4Q?3CRJpqd*#maA@RwO|pQU_BUf z#q{=!4CsnC`ESMXdt)z3nLVEt6vB!^xwZRhBtNkk(RnIgCvJoZk^oqPf7!t_gy@tk zfM=Vfnbf3ZkbygmvjRkoo%zw5i-%mNdRN@nAA40%E1Me0Zb|cquC8*syiVnzvoBYYc!>8uz8mi4Qq-3#}vPEj-)QyUIG#`R?wT?!x z0bUscnm^aC!V>sM*^|L#08B+MPnv3TVAG5AxD~wTFG}y{3@J6{FgY%b4AhZ#O@(@|Y~{?N z_DdJ|$)>TCUGG}#R?Q#y zv-C1oXR-@Iqjh|Y10kIR+6P4C3+^<}g$_#4f_pZiTTT3CpzooGL-Der52Mtj{VpZ-%gW4beZ3w^+_M5e28^90$)=}f z-eNuxfxBj2IdgDiY@{3Hd*s%p~{egCzVVMNt@L z%3U~66bUT1nC9nt#>ZJIi!Z2IVf~Z1H*Df^088|Xe+cSe!4VvpZ3CpJ?Z@S|3O$I- z_nn|S!fBi@?|LZW9m_>)M32(|cKGn3lZ-Tlb(1ft$<4A)cj}EqhX>DcG-d8^0+$S~ zPfI;;3TnA-Bmg!{2X#;LNFVuRqgf=n{{K8VH3Xv<{9277DkaIS5_6TGLo85tgvlxr zlbYrveM9M_RF3!uEpU1qPl0;lPS6IjzK6f3vW zHTnIai5+RME6zO(dBu+N-CYhp&i&c+!zH{wf3niS?K&tb6NYXab_vb`X_`YR#R6&( zyr%lrDQ|)zUD{C>2+)82^>$K7)aQTvFWC+ABeo);oq3CKqe3#6nN6LHY%V_Bj23-3 zT6yv%vCEzJ&I*BUeKka6x^&1E@P?cNX#$U?VckT@4&vB5^R$#fPj4bH!&k^f?zn8Nvrs@Y5K|&E=hDiBDa;M)g)~T zK%-GFDkWBI^bEXVov4PPC?*bZ&3BN{`h!$W|7_Fjr+@0|?$g?Kmzn%Qs<#`)D9Lr^ zx}x9iay)J?+>>*k+qjc?rqvChnp@Bse?Go(NF>20%BZ7t$U_-V(UYXQ`bRMY%1`;) zot~-u)HZfpZ~m0p%u5qADyKwtDW;Dv@5?sf;g^?USz~|er7lD=ErpV|Gj-}ExXIt9 z(%68J!Pelt(}_U$#&J3{T6mHcwv&QXVXJrx8(*m@_vdG3HbBDl$>~^RX;kaVfAFAY z;d3U+D_?v5iK550M6Xv46!NU{1fS_-L|^$@Em+Wj*I!&z6M z72XK7hR`>|RH#8m#ys6pXBLh(f8nk*I5KQ5eEA(yrj72=omrc=XidDv&SUB--qLVA zw1x>4>!dj(R2ZXK^U?2ikQv>>FeOT~Dh^?9t1+8E$qA0K(W<&(rdiem(Zez(E4OBR z2RS}go?W)klpb}j3p)jI2Fr!e_9Z3jD=Z2 z5N6~~4V@0f1+%K1@_%ZK#^ewx=ao`mr>nbc;*m|;(_rVRvlDkj(;MDtrBsouUc~fg z3s82=<%LI)Lm3Nw_nilq(Kr=eGJatVw? zCEV=0e4k(^R$i717bs(*f1zmH#}oqdI@Rb6l1fhpJwS(30B*|x^Y%V9eB-+-fJMI7 zTeX^y+15ML9ho%O)T2Oh99>nL;c-%5_7qCWae4VrSjDWVu5)vfY8!0|L_|@%YJ&V0 zhZ)q(nl_FV!i}uO{0Pj7F=~0g&@iAGViQ=-{f`8MK~B5}j7b<3f7K{Ss>kuVqXF(2 zh&8OJZgOKEyeqHy6CIzlwd2xD2$d3fy0GaXV^z!To32=vVwu+VF2vZG&Wf0vE^A`A zrpYM!ZspJqD#tCMCNEJODSpT0j6us$lZX#j6);p2B#cM^7+UDdoKiq6f}27TQNxt# z=pttxf<|Ay;N@5%fBdvPDv?yWG%JQD<@qH7$y;V{>B_AmAyKNs~~0 z-(Pe)y)dv+po;f+YcMF+iUpMD%9cP?*>;u??8&YjA>1dqfBzqzC&v>yc*Pm?e3bE% z{DE2Y)q3Fi*d!7hO*ABMQ<67`zLqL`YBDIOmTVQtnI>eUjBM}lXgMOUB;!# zs4H%W)+wLHr<*1TVB!kUL^!``qeo+~gdQ)`cvCP;d%TtqxT54&JidYRED_@>J+hbe#oRy}S;gO_EjbV;84A`}4Pohv8bCD>;0>|?9A+mNoz?!t3&9_;d-y{Hr zo$A?Ue9Y{=LXRz*N2d(rEje7|lJ%i^{kf1UEd)LubZqsEouK*e@esbgniUd*<- zLozZENtzG4A%^_W(#x>pU)IT$WXooPZo}r2b3K+JCtV5{Q_`uc!vwr#2N*t~8kFtu zHi`Bq{2)Lpw#N|;B(X$+0T&Ju3&W)VnWQX^Fer|eEiF|6f)Q~Bk6 zxV;6hf)i~addgO$n&%O-Bt+WZNZwPW}bce#&*ihRSd8=9Tdi&qPYLCr1A&@jOAxU(2H$)&JZ*v5BO)wpI8?q*p*uOn(g#;Nkf zB^qd;uL`ek4*w1jYc+KZeQ}ZCe=SRn;956gG@(ffA0W*|F9c{S-AyN0es>Lmk>Z;! znJ=?w=yYIWb2+}h67M7fRM!hvVbrqmH*Hd$v2k?55MdruC_{AGnok43P0|i5e8mQE zRJ5*Yr{>n1GMCspO7B)8A5pFDa$;P!vkipnWvtqQ;f8FiSJ^8$?93dKfA6-uQkP9$ zEV_5!>L^&B6<8DJwX28oy5|ClY78~*uBL``l{*h=y)1vg!!8TXzrO6-kJsF{dM_86OJ34+Ohk|o;y;d{MZG;D`NmBvCv(avO+sAU%9)(hOXZDCi1>g{A%vFO$?U3t5|DI*`$KxwZV^`&{G zvhh{#AH5w)`0JY`;dbAdrt&X`G-4~P8E3WB)JtT<1q@QN+E&;pr?Wz@0(0}K!K@8U z?q_cl$*^=J9PS6;{(dY0vQh#(v31gK99k<(?EU3@c}{W#NQ`hge^@^~wW5>gfC|S{ z%ajUNH?(7*AmYmUJ4O8pT~JQB%la=$^EumBd~Os$YeQTdGKQ+VoLzW@(+{PYMLTj3 zJA1T|#myCq$n|sOJ}GJGT%wmUn)q70bLP9y-a*9#d>DBQs&&z$Lju!g75CffW+xbJ z>-g~Iy|2A4zj*gMfBknA1tepZ-x~LB?^Kex>N^9!{bE;!{PqI48li#jG0Iym^xj}$ zv$2Y{g)dL1R#RIrm3S-oa2PdsRM86r?AM+RlMEyfvPxPiodZWvTl(WONq zuG9-kuhl)mn8+q84?1S7oc@&`R1Ipje11z?vs0acC@fh} zRSZ`rBm)>)_2k=;?qJMbzEy4sYR(K#IPYKc^l$?a(A%9ZWnc9# zS@wL@j_zCL_U`}0Mky|(n+T_i3g)*}Kn)KoU%Zw@*AAAm*u5&g->_ige!7eicH=Yg zu=Q`#9_MwL;kTunc3S2rX!cioC&zLb-eFLtgc;^Stc${CQ&xQ0r!?1$W3 zsX{z@e>tGlyQ}JIHgSnzSDm!-F5eygPSX=jqC4ZLMtQ=Yt={rq`2K^PwRe{FOL|PS zAl#XYa@aQ7FD_+MP-{!Qlye+fFN(rNfr&5WS`5;pdo)^vVyDZc|L&`_Q*Thl;iecq za#c)pNcqZP#%0x5wT}CkgkfYkt~_UK)qxvVe*r~=rp>d>X=ztVjQ9Z3>m1bE9EdTn z`^FgqX~wsDH&h@qhV1P}Y27C-rnZ!W$Il+pTdL}oF>7r5j;M$SB}SJ>^07{pt&34E z4d$Q_e78klq>K`k@hrBUEVYlh?+FKMM0;ywXj;U}`Q2M8`>b{KHam<#3)RZo=7v}M ze@;j}p5g~!eVw^LsEPSmC1(Ae-}J-1W$Hqt3dj{b$^`5y&qrmf`O}Gwu}U&ucUK(< zyXpkEO)YI#BU^Cfg|t3%wvgXgt8XmFBu&s>u-KhPll9WU$H9zAxcH}lV~Z{dDARvt zAo({#`JD6fUonu(+nEmuEx3|*CJ6JA_u4eLdeYFdZO(#$o00*1|xE8r5U zqurxX&xWnMk77RLg7q7F>*W)!i02Xzd0k9?`!bQ8>993-Ni*}iGDX8?3jn%g z+82AJ^+L9B2~8^{4K5oJ-14Lue`6~%(mR%GH)?PI0s~Vjl8{PbgAlaYOkftS4OJb= zp}N@%p|tV3!ldu@IpqdG$ly3=5{`1R1d1WZ=v*TBZPwu63!L?0T^-1$A`z$IvD9>W z=~&%06_!a&LU1b$h0K&Ny7^5!wA_JbVy_YqM_SUUoGk>ILzzq`U?qWDfBW%TLE592 z&JVP$qWa}_h4XqIS8Z@Wc4&CfK?Q#Lczu7iAGDw0hJKv8oCtLSa!oUn=jGEs!ItmC zZ{7NIIK)&9YvGk;GNDmSG~+hy2_yp1oXo#o-tIJ@*&`ceSx_Y^&Q1a5*#6QK6xWVy z11Y-(lPPgeq~?I)xdq_-f2{;cd8#IMvmX`|t(8wQk4x?w64s+20MTB$=h)8@1CfXv zCN)-<)321@bE%869Vo!myiBTgtHuor^l?1eD?^fTeCcm94=R2oe_v1_sSW^NlwC@1RvPzAg&nxiQ0sia1)V z%T-+#Hj;d~+v}%cY-cvAi}pmO1nIE;y$ev3IR45`qOq5HI~|==+Qr{L(?Hb3%Ify* zYkDNek!0&YtmdVBe|Onoq3ql%=DOsca#*83x%ry=?IyYH(@0~w`dh}KTk#30-7D7# zA!g}Q`oGOI<)N+5fbD$<{W=+m-furAE3$H4#6Uo994o}pd~VyF;VJqS$&vQzW#uWe@QRBx!m=(du}#3Ly-A-=}Yh& zLq2-)0_b%+%!Z=;A(}eSZdqojz_N&?j2(>>$#163haU%2YwzJOx2YY`w-t$INIuF_ zpCV3oxZ-|4&ytgsP_ZC6t8a#ylJljgNO}r``N2=Ni1mKjJejBo0MkicLc3o`L=a)V zwiw+2j{#9?(>gbGfJs1-|VL-ENGciQV4%q;_NKCoy ze;s3jayQ*=EkOa!J9+$)C{q>@JFs%7B_$xv@c!5)Dm~p!p z%}S=^PH^?)9WG9nxaAMD>6Hi2Y?#UJ6^z$GuyrflGj5d|4J9DPfAC0jyAr-u8952?2f~TMcXkp+RT_SboOH1>G-W>b1v0~>^YWoa86Fw}`Gg~`f0ViZ zM^9jm)f<(gxcMkjm4Kx)91*~~ys1;+h!ATlKJ8q^LuyV~c$c#IuyCnskZ}DH_z|^6 z`8V9)&f~Lkk(HTtHdNn^e?N_eW%niFgQmpRmhP`;UsjajX+-0)Rqx5NEv89Rxjpdk z4xnN1O67W8-tjnBJQiksmv^p#f1F2ge3>UNT!5*J*yQ8X0FD$;DyWBpmh($E?}X zo%IXpPEM!aPN4~%vss)&a$8c3uFJ9hi>=sy^oM~MUqFtc+d)to#l zu?|Z`3N>nlQa%zXa{>Hxe|!1#d%3m$FjKm8NPGx>Mw6slb`XkeG!|Ius${Yv_K?cS zs$*%Dww7yJwE|u;UY*O}J|crrwXAhiIZu{_EPxR#dTPETp8#@|O#on4)q^%=#VP>- z_nX7dUQ^v$Q;E)?e{Lle#jA}DDa^%v z^wSAmO*%15Y`;^M`K2Hi;sjd+9Fg~y57wxLydHG2UtyKse|))I-^!M% zuAho54rH0U3>C03fBG~sM;l8ytopZF!G(H6i$mZ>XYOrL4QA)%vdH*;vbob(b>n0; z(`JMT&kA@~7}L2*Az!M?{^5<9WM1l%9*oeenjlt}jFUOVxZh^el9V4)guiAr(N zqQ-4$G%~^<9MBTMId}e}$7ZJ5xvz-ie3M*ScGL0BnmWj(f3Aq?ulU3!3bce3fI{~j zL;Zl0q^Zc{4_DqG0R&=z<@}ameRq{P(R-@wcU+igZ@XbA$5(c49lksKM&{BNZP8u8 z2M1D+Gt&L}$FNqOS3aBzx+40#yS`&VVRzYbggiC)PBtY&Y}%8v@CU0v?pxBUFYT;l z5Nq2^m-}x>f6cqr7)LeaVG6LeIe_Dj#zfkX-1)sEnPPegjHO)TPJ5YG(`w#4{nImSu6#iq z`D1cu3zrLqtrgwF<;5vbPjar#x#n(iXzisSNRuuse~S&1b6MX0EY-FkHVzhcVvU2d zv>g@HGxosX8P3{HWliEgQvwjFS<2`3&A%k0iJCEY{X}}UH`VS0i`usnQU@^i2-x*_ zs3zE*)DyVT=~t+_qoUDZqJxOtumu7)_Ic=t5JJrQ z5N|@9tOc8L7S;_AWKMO94;X<0@N73yK+`8m+4*NvQ`FTcbIA7b(TLZs| z_k=k04lA!XG@B-?#KkkGZvEtwX|i};1ku_aZ(m?EjRCdiMjBA=paaGU~j zbw`Y_rK8@8&5dA$9Vfmb7dA-}b|es22yxb)L~T)v$!Rinj&9hFq{Ss9%3Y&b^`K@O zxT~cuatY+e@xqaQ00XqKoggY>MI8bUt^f9skU z90gniwTj0kFHQ-`aBhJu8TO*`qneIH?Ji^Kab5M1(2i91SFz1H z`_Q;#z<#z%*I#XK7OIx0Q@2(+OYN_Abm>p%F3$`;|rBTz(*blY)7&z@lMy{(cqIJ@-cal0c%%nJ~g_8yh;_LdesE3sC{yybSpb?62v5ep`f;pTU}aqZ(>W`VJlTg~9S$V+YMU%Q zfV5cuGS(O067h_4#rdF`)^~)M%OVSSv--n{7n5(R898)@H&s zPgMcpZ0WM?V`!>M+vFk<+q&Fmh&Z~aAlAgF3RdYL}fvDS6TqmBsujd-l) zxt+3oa1JKkz1s$%TV>|0%CWi11uF@)+Y&VgzD=<%#;@ZbWEWg2MV)AjK8@2Ag;W-P zF7IEej|>;f7-Mm!UndhO5x9PQ(OelhfK=)c7>Z_!*n4YaWxdl|=&-f8*8Ni8#@x|a<72bp3Ei4dpS=He+JENECXBAp<$R5i@{&yU^jbanqVuS9_lm9B_Nwl(WudK z$+jyxj1LKAkj%4f>SeyBnBc{L-1r{80)V%`gDGI&D$r-Dylv{INLWlq%PM{`ESF{u zf0}aKchYXMRSC)~-z-pa#+}wfp7$q%oU`mu$hc9u==~^5LAtD~iBE$gdnBmk7M4%D z58GstFG(SuHUg*{*Ya_qZod2x!%x!^J?yMMWk&qxcz<@ctUrg!?K5mZ8#_;z5jF|% zLl}Je>S%ly8;J0m2A^SKxf`_eG~S!_e}!x%cF*p9p0(X-^mDs?lnhN)jH>Hl5_ey5 z@O?D92AR*PrT`BEM)fGEUyw#9uhDKOT>F#5L{~LQ*39~17+t<)Ig8-5u$Zo}f4Pr# ztiR{k?3PfKkkw$&uQ(u)aQnFyPE=}IY64g|7Z}RfkC5^A-m%u3J!EP^Ak!_98<*Ei zw%MIK6|JV`>?SG56K{QJ0egkhh=3j~4ZtvEG_J5z_WjwFIc;k$JYCl8(1CF}ntmK` z|JquEr1Ix2qf{aZv03X9(WF{Ie`?w*1!rt%J#3W)eBznRYBbbIQp-~no65DE!{ojs z1RJqAcN`rGU{A{49hK^~>TABSYS#1;W(XKvbA~0#Ce`R^gs#e-bodb`CaQISfg=s)1tz1j`{!6ck9YvTJPU zvw^X2sw%Kr|5qrVx%N0wWde2l2!q!8h|poVtc>MW;+8~d+?G`se_0_89APh4PX=#z z!{x|yTv%BN_)X6Us-~q#OmpJ|a?w1RVOOxLw31`Kad%g6bHp6>CV)A)mE<~Ehs~yV zrf~#+uW#f&V;++8f)s*K=suWcGW@#p)D8lyE83OW-J)?Bv=6Jwu6W(@-*?B+nUU1Z z&cs1Ow69sKJDY8EBXy>7ZE66( z*i>Iz%X`~9=2m45$Vc#%E3^9teR*56g5U$rw-M#MX8|oZMBcvj3-Cf22J)+g5WXiR z=7}d>rvm>em7*8pW{VszsoTHPuaP1VgiCGhu>v`Pgke_12&Rib<@`cA^2@cvoI z;H1fsIiRE=Tq#z}EO0OTvBx)xij`Iqa z1%D>b-VQJ|u;CXTA(&CC``1)(KeHvHzI9|L#leby4Ghr2LQ;=w{YX+-0?27qiMyNi z$)qPZer98Ye+2$v=ay?$D}D+!>gCPnO?*s~$$eXL!gZ(zLkc^eB!iVKgErSRm zTo}o91puXw`qKo&D89NW1Q2=&Yi_KTLb) zuG)d(e+dnX0eX)Q`O5V{=g~>(E$R@J06Rd$zoDeDy_O|tX0-+j5(!{Jfoe<_)Kz}F zQ3REC6ato+pSO}LFKYso;U3p+m6m~c;?eEPdb2r9S_{ejFU~Y7XD4fSIT+5I=(rN6 z;73-u9WwxkZhY`Ty7wNf8ByPsw`Vp!^h#I%qbEbW(SJ){>)X0Xx?UzckE%dGz}Sd8 z;=Y#%@fyS?T#WYei)8g?gS6N}mZ-drL0HgiS}?80#i8Vm$bZzd1^6XS3w6@#gY@41q)qRkng}M) z5+EO$s@b|j8gx1lGtrDK`%>NCw5H5gx9ze1iN=9)q0}zno5QaGn7U;W2>YjMiWi7% zt}_#Sf6F(`g?A~Fk-Gt`>07g^5S;9cTTxyzvc$THNe#)_-Ept*`SK3^%Jisd7qCa5 zHh;|QQE169G^Kx-ZRYrBwFVQ^256Ev(6cD0zb?H--E0IkggC6!7nY8PbwL++XZ9DA z`j;I_cY__mvS+jpC4|M!)*uEk{P|cusvp*RjmtfL-RGMkbbLl@Bya5`iCCW@xeKT} zyR5&DcV+bcko6-u0FSW{yMfYzQdT!bd5-tH{a&Zyc-(-}SwRx32P zvJu|CJAAJn!^Sq{`OB5DK;>sFiP^>f@HHA{EHcCNKnUDlZx$Rh{QF8mLv1xF+wb(!RdbckFYwiJzzh^nW5t zsTt^%s`j)Zquw1*Zyir*Zo8C_Qd$qG@!;rqek1kiJG^dyHa(BaH-}#>8A>1%OHbeM zX$JikYpp{)kG$^YR%ppZWr3s>1*NH>CWs8;>Lc>3RhnliD`ZwAEmZKq+%FU>7pPPi z)OTwCJn1vC=pGw44S+Xa8wfKb3V&f*Wjeq;`p4^9kT!<&$=HuK)mAS_GI7j%das5C zQnqUJnumN}6{6vQDz^?&;8W*m1a7-iO&X~+Q>T=$il%BmyDbVfWdqV{RMqO9YNNcS z_bXp&xLM9IVDjtm6%uQTvsc_cA?MQ-N}C-A*Kjktrt2~uHMnGU42!#1_QqkeycSlNOU2E zIHKr904rN^3JfJg^ZRM>-hVnRRgg!@iM*nadWeHWKL+X?q}~^<>iNb2V8UPiuwL#P zda)j)yvz7irWD?t+D}QYa2rT+7v)kxUYJ z2;m4u8#gr~xD22ap0sSsUKW>op<#FClZkW8W?sOq}J0W(Ar_Q z+$X6WB=d_%ftAcrzRleXZ=j0z5zrFQo>*4(WxWwr zr@eRIm-(cW8h5<1t0@WF(X7+okkf!fUDH=@zqQ*1)HyyGJepp4pX`9a)EBM(tYWfs zElft0{87ETyttPmo&KUqUQff#;BsbPiKNw zB%Y;WYO)+xHECAIc~%sN7SM&D$}nk`D?~bOEf`)?MK-yZRoWbHXtR*6MH*Jx^&Q)< z)0K)%QkF9rafU%&cuGLE^`USPT#>C+0RHk(i!8#E(5hJ%f93jn!@bmzeW{Fe>rz!x zzl>^OcE_dmgMVkBJ634uAA$O4;!t{yzUe;dw^^mFR+NKqzbV(Fi!3M^oF}slWPrV1 z+BNOnRo8Yxe(2Ve>`|SHzd6)s&Rs5r8^gw0@|9I(+~gYDn#@)ntbWI;z~hmuHF9RY z>kzllgZNIwOj^Iuu2L&{(`CH%@2EbYz|hQW%SOtR34aKgqp%!zXdFK57V#~Aj^p?` zx|TK~z&a%V=~NO|TNce`D&IN`g}@x^+6-@1zP{?>bIQ@GkNoo+7!(Qz63nc> zl@Q35+kYw`82g-bNYTZ=bGnz}%H>{mf)J860^<=RDf$&tT}E_*)>y-!s$JH?dz zVvMful7g6x6TIUsEymBu;aD=$yx8lVAnZ5+;eSv)aJL2i%*}c?x8wit@Q9ar{C@q5 zdei^)H-GuB8}nlikSe>yd@skid6@1OmVPmp9DAG(fAz2b>R)&60rEsm36m>Zb!sWi z7z!Z24p#M_Res`sA1=%DaQK_)^6}JBbh^K4ssD@9f9RLf;rq+9URBMZ>;*FFu#En< zMSrAzCv1XG{|$1ouHvz5+6_Ozav;{Q1e%Hvze1kJr3%`G(tOiCZ%c)Hcq{b9IPf5Cs7e5#n?0!rB@5_f# zObr8)D`Rz@J?iXPwcIJBsGWlT3F1(pWp{ZQX8^3UolMPN(6H+>m-qw8TC~qN4u4b9 ziZz!(8@#9Kvq&Q{+tMPL?}4rf&0c{%3zXOr@Gn0c64Io z>UNS0eNY|3zuWqVW47s4o%>}F(P?qN-Jr8--qZFP0=jo3t25^YyBH$(Kn+_1Y1|ui z!R>+SUU}(H!rgN|@E_~#r>Z=f36(FrMpfvT*Q(9UNY&T99TEDfI9STHTYvjjyl1G| zp7s7{S-}ShL!O+=u>LY_-yD7;lQC_(aI9PjA=K>|?eDH@)!Ek-od;ok#5lQLdfb8< zH{8VJ!RgSrwB_HEse*!VcoC=M!N9_1X$$a>Bs9E zel~cBv#th%=5S{Qe2q(;XnzpV1W&z4sDsk*U+Xxi{qZogWV8bugvGAiUVN}61Zq^) z&F~qx7hYp~E|?%iCLFqNc-AT6WJ)q@Ht5T2I9&C<;EveN`JDBIKPR~@_px?^zKT?T zt2ofjwsHb4T0^e!byt{iZ5A(=jM16=vSi1yn0f*y^NsGLES{ezg@3U&o5lFBDzlI} z@~(N{Ag44a$+|?dqVlLNu~`tQ9C9gAc#8IF+Pyv{KtG+GtcYgw2}1i z&q^_kL;1nHd-kZCMBe*Fuq1{BwS_E=^sH)7)>@&&0Dn-Cua>zt1`o2PY-FNA4={O` zX*G1n*YPrMMsRr@+E4Dw%MlzPS)v-AI z8eKf}uEjrEZ8n5geCEd93;?;(*rdG3^U|L&?>k=5U0J=QRQ|4OOrZQLXLmBPtCCl~ zgMaaJ0BC0s_Jc#Pbx7~n+{Ej0;F=t`(kh^%Q8sLUNvZ4mpTtpq)6(mrcEaI zhXed?UEhKCUUNg&!f8b6+OyMmIBp4T!a8g%82^)ar9gLSZiZZhgz4Og*1zV`07{;b zVA%5|Wzfy5lTn`B39yq;*mWAv@PsPPr+*YcE;4-^#;v{re8G5BbW2-cP4N9swe0d& zLs3`5d6OhZgw_o&2?2A8(_nMj8xv^RJ?h!hze*T=-JqKCz9axw>sI8xRT|9e*}5kK z{|{r6m`296Vw2q9tT(!-DYdQS%%E`b=?|}a-h9nbaax4z{gZHX=r9EN>==mHo`1Q@ zYzk+iOy#TQ-z{v(O_V~L_$2Cb#r&xG$}3`$7(cH&2FIEpSte~5vdH^S?m$VpWaTX_K1@&qNO5lT=!Y(hY<4(+v8SV zFzNUl34;N;@K{kJLqiW+V!7j5`3KjZT!z|L4GxP4yd_kPrr_x{#3lrymw)lPXi4T5 z6wUq1S%a4Rq%y|Px)+6efCfEum4B}vOIE{w+j-5O!t|(v7GZ*R4K464DPzu6_iJ^J zPE*%;lM%CeHvqtKRW0_qQboT^Q_pEwtCn2qIWt!ZVv{5@vx;~!Wqr0K$)BBvDob< z*R58rx<3;<4md^+0oI1{Rkzbbu1;5_jwi>#r>PWhDv5WJqgrvr_8RO*;<@J%sbnB;oBfGM)D?*fK~Wj$hkq1u3H1z^Y7G{( zp^HUXwhZ&UY#FJr#sxDUIAys)b|W-YjgSj>LT{*9%eFE`J$-f~w1pcjBi-fgtuKg0eop;lE&Ics zB{^vpQ6$0Zd51%_j7~EP!sT8!=G@5<>pc#l*CV%GTw1%wYQD%oMC5ebd zq@rm^QUvQ(UTT@#mJUBA+MGa&`u;@IFuAah)qEDT4Cn1_82- z=ju%a<5U9Uw38>LmoarmB`O$IoE9NfQ9B;c8RX60ua1o^7qCR1GpeOmSPtHB!7~0HtiGk(y6@s0H%p)N>IU( zf2oE55z>VJc^Dg(FTCrdAX_YyRN8K~pz%mLl@>Fv(d3!K%$Y~N+jY0hcqOP+buFCK zlNbhktE0Z26ulS#CNSwi^_Rl#JeHl_i*p43Hy(a-?~9r;y|WE_8Y2=h~;b4Z|(_s?FA6YdIB8yV% zvCgOce{!tjuBgNrTJhxkn0%)=_TP;a=I6}!=arg+>425JRmZw5k~3*KT+!o~p5eF) z=K$^Iu?=gs_~(vX*nq0$|a?1_f2 z*+91u1Xz!oA~u}CNtZjQ2eJ{Me@@xDhkw#5t`ac(N)dE`XXsiAr3Fk(diN`g_I_rB zIzMXsz6?T?I1>qagC)@2&}pnOJmgC2QSOnk3-~Os6t#7MJ$px^p{-)XY=+!VSw=d0ad5KqPq3Gxcf;yP zc2xuBLjd-AY{owdFPXv3gERl)#C;vN)UVTb@^gY>2O-{|~*k}ByK9;6TgxhC1yjsqHmJ0ckp_c=iO zYDK=&=w5(8Qm(lu3i4@&#iwAzNxBFJ@izhf+RUvd zCLgB8PPtQVF~RuE52LsYTz?l&Lg&dnp;r6Kie>w-R-#dSHos~Vb%j1;+BiLFhRU5j z2Gh2~6e9@pjXH7Y2*E>itvBNZD(@-}FqnWr42-Q{UVgtGxUWe4)Dz#vku!Dm2bWD! zt_>-Ej7qPO!HyLM@%r%zuVuadL&=Pl&;SDZz>5v27f66I7=;gf0e?e`r}^>AJ5;2& zvu=>5vr@4vI8AMZV81SHA|a83h!`pTYlgkNnl16*wuIzK74^T|%R%;Yj6~{uQr3xp ziGt`DVD!>Sq&r`pr9}!PDus0~0&yy^8=Lyjffo9MQ8A-Ir8LqRg)K~nfSY8f^dNe* z%U}_jbGwl;TKa>|V}FffQLfGW_}94tipK3+Hz=&doXfRP5=XCfTza1FL$^hnG${=) zpVxf9c`ChUm0@+HY%CztR~g7(yf-PmRxT$UIj*SU%U!330!AJ)ePn;SR}TCbO^*aOR{HVdFzCzZTlL-ABfPs{u+nK)Q zpXrGbc%*b$Re!A{FAdciE!*f200W?4vh4s~1%SBhZMVO22wwO3f>)jPLdKN{9ZN0@uX^(Na3&^(!k*sP=GH8UV^h6zajTp|^nh zRHd|tI=tYkr)n%FvWgbFRKxE2-Wq*Iu@LeMC8*X2gM`paP|tWk59J@+Fce&0=oXc# zB5-rhi!>;@hSEhCg?_q6hed1IaSbk~i>PpvZ>1PTX;+Xg!U^a^YBSFf-H7`4cp_wmUkCN_JEU6_4CE1s_V1ceWP4Y*6Jj%mC((I0Ru7dnE3Q9lhr(fawmQ?P=OM15+4 z9R+jQ(BMFWqU>N;ocnAW!7vaG);*PuQdD*dWLgY!5A2Bw5^$nNNiWz6mHsO!JGH8d zU=RW78TN8_5P4XKLV9@|L~OpXQ$tG1A%D4HA`_WGcK6G#B}M3d1EnCCSnJ9}mmcc$ z*-Zxq#z(|IR`8CE;1KBqLhtcNNw|(~zIxTNcJQk$3|W;#2q1i`y!l7eo0f4k+@AZj zw1BPuLFzUA>3jxVw-@u<;7?Jjqn6855{3_5A0mDb>{W^bQt0q(8S=o|tfEyjB!9I9 z6h=OJ5lLJa+=sOC=VraF7);1o9YpG#)vq7}h(Hr|7TEq1u-y8|vJCPs5UI+B+oYtt zJEukJBW_#++QXn~igV38HzbVZvBUJ&r_+$k{C?plHM;h?S2D5_Dg0ol{iI^zf&2we zPgSBkT$p$yDE>)g4WzzOVbs+urho5Y@QBMNqFt_6W3p(&DFV+QToY}p_*tb3qzyBi zW@&8f@tmsPG9VC1gk#kuI@PGEX7RG_s8a$J2i=OIg8Zr8s?gN9ZQjSx^vPDe$3w$?|;zABHB$zf$7ck?Dut8&LIJ4 zn!@I4{+0s+>fa$5j#gU|1D#jRRlPIHWxFS>z9X~+ffft78OyZijQ6nEK9`_in8Fmr z>`e5`o{MZ++uhEf*9yUc z{BDv=JDsp(#OO**pX0fpTvsQ@RcQ-xBjfOM#$2hKEW|jz5)n%k#J_1){VG$f&K|SFrk0e$Ni3Z z94JEumVz6j*9c(IjD_TALv#31n?X9=UPU010fIhoqwR9r!);~hW=$i-d&INz8K*V_ zpOSE=R74*o9aPg#>VH$ac&Z_M1=l084$@k;!dZ_{zLZ>TRlBNTP>j_oinnoY=!tN)I_&QSch<{Z21byM6xrtwU@Jp`(bP?7j2+<9@O)CXXN;tkqK@>L6=f;G`>ivK99W;^0kGc27JR z09;%eRtK{f8GqDZC&;j%fiEF8NV&P67v7YPaur!hl9IW< z8r@DaS!E2E=<*pOTmXV|4=QFXkFR=UHXpX9MDxZ-7)w2^E0^>K84hg}_F-*@sjd1C z*Ev(*%?j3^Q?1meGWo45u(Ti4vUaU|i>wgD0$+_vzM&i&76p<*#j~2sZ z$?4*lynHYj(Xe0Y2$k$0$jyPFVvB2Ix-m&p*E3d*u`Zsv=bBeRZL?wyfzoHf2A{XW5i$X}o-dX^$;iNkL-9He1bq9H4B@%9 zW9J^)RnZBKhFDqCN^TCP*KkByhFE?Aan2gmLbD&0gp&rEIp!owW5cUsX`$upu)f&x z;0kzdqgAAvKniGM^1V$t&Ys#zY33FT3THcIn zg}}CwpAYFsrR7V9DpXOot1L%?TP~Os+g;r*1f?ARxx_t~5e(BNaSvk-r2MbeDP681 z7QmTNL8L-;2n3M4a_)v8lY_QyIk1UW#fyg1VoDyKj#7EqopdCc&Qu3)X+MlV0L1c4 z1%JOjUK^W?nMCS80=z5sQ-a?%{0ZoAdi<+RB2=`(6Pbw3lwxq1^tbYT>3&E$@p0=? zsk^5R?~QmxoxT{-_=@V(6Y;_%+xd4Iuk@Yw}_RsGNC5Pw8@ zrPG7hL=)4s1E@*q$G3Vlz5ib0320m1m86Z<5N8`;-em4T=sUa%L!usIi?<+V*@Bj< zR=VW&-u|}sy1pRkGtWZZ2w6*HUW}A#(7~GLu~LN28muh^6*;Ku+AS^Jf=Nw#d|W4apO5U5pIT7O)JWa=mo zv5$Wt_F8C7MVg%s!(KMo1U}3^am*l}Z3o(+l+DJip` z^}2G=njhvmyy4M&DFlQdS7M6kGLOc`1*QsT?v;GHRt!cim5zl;rhlG@JG^I~^8Ws8 zc|A9Z5S85OGon9t*Yz`b{5+%3`n7l@Q&w1=XkoY)^`!?@eKMX|%r9``>J1w7x!mLv!Gg5BE8L6Wi&hkh^lUBV9W6I=_U`Kv&|ad#aBMHw>a5j z`xy(=vaV(Mu=}}nL=F!Pv7TN8)l6-jLOfHZ(tGa`ClyVcabX%LMbz8R|BF;_-+unz z<~nqO@_4z9BxG5B;yEHsXI{4P`2%2QSREoW^EwN(s6GouoqtnQ%L!tLy6A*)n}u0v zXPp3~RBqL}cSeg!G0k4F8d*7Y59mL;?wcAq_0PWs_*zLnB5>r<^ZA2niETG3vSOhq zFR>)Z;Q>w=mlR6Y7AV{=6q#g*mrUJx-rZeX&`t$Q`C2lr=!tYxMgXr{v10=6> zdcF{b(|^g?y7vKRz?cxF=U6x~9t#?;tT5N+1AJ`7##HSEsnBb5)FkKhm<*KY##v5eq&-&eaZns}|8KeWZKX2e`^t3pPWaLfX#3G1f|I(Mp17>WdN zHIKor$_ET8^U(z|j9s^cl-wbP<&RE-&j0chg@5m^2qe`qt>!kY@34WprR#A#v%uGc zX3xp2smZI8djO{Ooj>GSl}R1a_=cZsx~{oF>%>GOJ42V`{m>3wR$&!|5h);*ESA&A zb^T10$j(5I;xR%IMh$T4jwW^3Ns?W~-(=H-k+Mpr*m(9?xX2E$xNF0zpj(G7K%@pT zOMk{wh_r(uLf;8-<(bVMz@8C;!?vNPNz$|g1PpsQtzk`vZk%`{N(QM>*qD_pb@t(C zt9VszifMmPCj)Vl=gE{gJ+XmsY}JYvS)jxC$Vk+aBf0Jk-)=5QvNZ;rdU=a2N>Bgl zq1i7?To&G)v}TqX%I?^A$tpyTM-?~iy0P3J8{ zQ+iqon#X4Sq$>}h{fnFp<(5(hNLri>Q;Xp|O6zdq1j%}fC8D}oLX;(0W6Sfr(W?(Q zwrB>4Yr$H6B1;vyH@f4Abd?L=H`C0h$yz8=YTh(Q$m2(anZqeg77pJTUsK6&q<@b8 ztT{M9!M-oKsu2f-6f<1<=UhazDc$ zqVCOzw(M!#b7x1;y30Uu_nKjmca8^S6L8X*KU&#*M3|05IX11f5c*Wf(x@54&vV^0 zO-U7s6(*Tx08ke4$9i%$8>Bw=&3_tI6}W5$?n`=kN4LuD0RfuOd9-|tsK#4w5Qet- zU{pZQH13j`q#;b&-9js977OYCF9M9gDNDRruspl5jXIc@*K=LECZTc&>}>Gsc5xjI zou1hA4Hy^7RsD6*amMrKYbnlN={>Bt4F zC`MbYdVnp1dzQIP9YA*3$>%K0l=T`%VzZWi$p6dNI7GDsK4H%8RRal>H%HQArClpg zv2Rr&r@nHR1{JQBeZ?jDTYrvSl5|RQ74&OL{RHN~tM-LZokDsDKkznBhq{3hxsut< z%OMy+R@6|gcsVawJ;994nNV?S4k(O<3oKzs#c_8B$T{ofQ-z7M8xV~;Uc%+$207BL zELDZ7k$iC7`eDaFTIuLuc6n9j-Wwft+Pl=DS|xoOU`o1NY~T#r@_$|E5Zu@-*sO%e zb72PWK!K0)@d@uAJ`9c~k*MK>kG*XC3CgXmc-0a2D)+xr3nnlmIwV$6^-h~4*Y;Zy zV;fmfJ7N63`yInJ-9@T78@<(B^DM~A504d|m0Ag6Jg-16%1@Ue-p_r1V!Tj9Y`8*y z6or;^T{&xEW7TT}B@MMp7wzvhnslHyU{KQANOBg7!ThIhtP zHQPcyLcr(A)PEFi(VaFIgP{^XcEj2@Am0HyM}%Lpo+^o&{WaL$mNz|g0#L9tMREB` z+%C27-GxC^XTyDqCIE8L2VKU=TL&9z7&M`!;h{`x!ci0_F3udX_{6O?Yv!yFSo^m8 ziJrqRdr_$<&`Rt0v$2?ye(A{s&{X$u6HMd$GST77A%9=EzPQ5qE3pC=MuNPf08A0_ z)}V$-;kfBh*5qWePH&#Fa^kJc0;5uRUNvwUq0EEGc@%fTdJ=(SQT3UD^YVt84N`T{ z(tNd)&1ziu(DWK!ebJz!a>wBbZ)Y1#qo4*U!4@UAtcqp;2RR^7BckkJGJ_FdnVc{E zo2_!gg@0xJ&vb{X)KGiJE;JaON-D&wEipax#V0G&$u^L4t6H;aUfw^nJ-B6D-2k4937U!7_cDCFxx;o zh`Q7hU#S-qxd6h5FDu&0_ief5abAv|I!Q#^h<_flK{+b+ZA84KD6b;MV_SjfJ{j1Q zgOe#?EiyD!5<@|$(Xsyc)xC5ng)k*o3tjIkdl31Zl7_Sq!Z`sjb0<+7Zml;~zLEM2 zm&)b>q&+i}3Qs&ZB5I8iJ$~M&sIDagdqb&FB2qJJ z;eSUljdt+!ROiG`_DZYVYFeSo747&O&;XB0X-!GeUL)Z!Di582N!1=iu*3c??hItL z6dnoYhJ73jhP)(B3D+IB1iMFqIST0v9e?~H9Yd=5erc^Jhk%9dWG_l^Ee@XvIkClJ z1xU~-;YO;Oq-`rx}s{(a#t8W40NmGy78R{PS^$AW+ZO3LE>$iTFmE6e*|akIAMpG}x|Lz>TIfyzOq5Y+?in)^J}D-m#scqk$`4Ym}_K zR7B=2N)82^0A}G?5GQMJZ7NM>WioMlg;qpW$t4bHWw)MkIA-5VN$RDG{vYnAYsL$4 zBF#Hi%?j~rc%I0z!c&CYUUFs7+de<$sdSdTgF-8Ov5(|6VL&0cq!Yq`X}@GuA^&DInek>tiWm zAznIoM|hC#29?}>XUB$HCRcXJB38R%&R=uDJ=^KpS|J)HEuJkK&AtZRUlkY5!!Sbe zu<$WN65COB`{P$7$gy$7_ijG!)KOr|D_J#$>o0@thcz-RDmh~qk$;gqO^~nME_XCE zr@MG7Q>XHu2r*)5mso?9JAA%p`JbKh3jh;Q{s)bCme+iSj8d;o4uvN0M5C_D&ZB69 z;xCutmViH$H_s9S@|E0vGN)1z=v?W4>H(!G){zxl2eo;Fj!O7k{#G}K@dODr#dmR} z)m#3NPj_p~fOpU&jl&XTKcBSf7^dg@F^*{7@ju7Ai>lSX`TVGKd3@WkWv z2i62Ns8l(0%VKS`U7i4f2{m-xUYPH)Rj!LTg#bl+U7gR_^7cfs08Bv&SmM;W0#loP z&XJmB$87CEQo^}+_Y~Q`PWvHgF>S0b-nsN*wSHH&Lr3e`M^|fGWV?B5dCkF^<9+u) zgb#~*EUI>=#eYHiD^+QIb2mO+uzyBzmpyRt4}=(k9BAKLkBW-`t#^$SsNd35$nbGn z9qhcKdYtocM4dS_ZU%AeQrcMbJvS%v=SYc_d6`K&N0O(^1RTq80Fi*H_9lZmai={{ zh?qbWg2?Fq&;4j zF7$lC0e?AgPpQ`zB?eM!cY`lq+p&c9P~CsQt4UIqk#0dUEq)&ertLMk;@7zqpK|Ti z^L6N1>CzLkxV1s^R*zJUn#e;=GA7Rv%3Nq{5Ug_pf0zwR1p(T&x3@g%U;9aEC{vbe z-QSDGbSp(n8`;lJ5Pm=}kUd(t`#UKewd9u#1b_Gw8_uT=WjRODJ#YJTS_vC<;ZgwDZxUc}?+P8#-k=Iyw- z3ZTZWkL7N#K^JGCf*&B%U?+y$Ec~wBUhuCJ#-CTD>49_qr|&q4H!4ol}xb_$26 zvGooBzBf0e+OeL)psCL1fZGdWRY^4abZAqPXOYI#L7%PkOgdqfRxwlBuHhG~YLeWv z!E4L`RBM{}k&@OFcP!Aa;^&IYR)7BZv165ZF?r*PV&q#^^d>jW@b6}bp?oYtMk4&$ zOvX@CZ$TG&!Z?Hf7(;xd_)^vW<(=j%p?H$x337Yhqccd^6_->TE(unL)(pr*VZemP z3}_#*ZtqHM1|DnLFO(q0Rl_C`HU~YMovC)ss|p2Uh>djYzW!Cfi~cCg3*1ht$lHE@#;=8FTcM z_~u&hGxi>7Gbg?fn`2NH;eWv&EiBkLGSZ3}d4v{vggNGnFO*iS)-8ug34o ztcV)`ot$dAs_1ps4kn-Y&SK71f_v|Nu=K!1h9gEVlIohsB1 z*$G@#;?r2RlG31(yU0KUyAo-J`2vT1N6pZs+YlC&R3wXDKu(shKz}qw=GSGH-w!YN+PhfZli#L$Ieot>+Dedw;%Ag} zj#>LZ@g4cyn_<3x{Bmk5EEqT(?+aW^MV(dUNXA!Hbe*nRvLt~EaaEcK|J_Yh-4Zjy zWl)$F=eg?C&GyCI`hP?tr`!U!bIkneJsXrjQzG@0?!=;s8=%v)NLnh+-J(O0vJN_F z0D>tOxrxA#{$%_k!8d~LER%_S>-P~}2;~S>D~Urrz{6C)j>(9LXdKCqF>ZTkhSn8H zz&>bU3p5y{frx7F1yR&yj7>xhS)8)+0MF;$kY|K zevP{dg%JYMhTbdk(jhCoy3MuPLJ0Gce|;N$L8&MFGU&INis@!sLO}G$2P;sd)Q4*m zf}kmH`tFp9Rxr=SjR(Rj97jdUES$Pucd#g4ya88S$)ee)QGlF8N;NxN5q0ybcv_!$ zSrII*0xfQEWq)hoQ*GnR)l%^^2kH8?%TftddwvU3bNl!=R$B8WD-6LtEM`Oi!5j{+cx7`f`KUW_oc#+f=yUOP43>U~R1s%a?U z)7tawbUjmi6fHGF2KG&|e-!7hjh47H@j?}vwK^XFIpoE^NeaSeDcNfYB=TQ?jEa49 z;Ze7lHGdl#>lRBqa9rxI!$!NLGCatBVYZ^$ISHd}r4riFS2KGA&Yx0&ckUs!b0v6g z;y2AOEKE7z{w4z{z>HxaG+NhgYOYFh+XJlW#J)ai=L%2NpS-Wkkd@iJvYBs^kR_TH=A)=6f^ zYavk4T|ufFF2v5Ahee4$r@3LOFB)Subg2A)fDOT|V(?M+Jow(te~`-!W3v6WgBGe% zYk%s&i?>&4eLJ1`s1rpG8GLS9YDym>T7bryWkVskQ6V4KNxm)@9kuCd^_NeDuCT)3 z81iP51+B69L=hN(9EtSm;2Py&%-Il(uy{2o9V|2x{N!hm`0-f3vRS3gnb`uGnv7$G zS-3OfO~w>brkXDRBz5yiFu%=M`AoU^PG9?xOx019Kx$@BuNGw>6~N|hlhg(k zWw14e;_DMP8*jDO0FCys%i+b62UPbDCYt3*sjdky?E+5q# zx!&ApjNR7l&m~dFV38!7U>hL10|2opcF}mnIXfv0py=%t?&P%y$ zzFVYA!?kzJL6_ImxYR3>5D!#uGNVcU zAzQ1&;>NP3fmeqU0$fhXO#TWJylme)Ikn%$d`k!M1zqsLUwWq9kIGLGjA{$iZqz*1 zvnRF^7s-&mpnJu$bvG4nbltzmne3VEdpa9X;U)9sW$V1tniYvfXiL9jB3-7}DA-)B zGT%+e4$5Mff6V(ypzXAd5KP>&Hw=;tXSn|Swq7)xqB~+}_zhc%`$)_hy@$nxBy0gi zhF_Z&g8c)8RYxYM$hn%o3)9+4<~P16>qyQxGp655O}F~q?gcSAMn3(*-BRk7_1fU7 zC6a`w4+PD@S(gq>b#>BHl%c%&o=*rtR%V-amj`_I1+_Bg++F1y?*mLyBB-hF-0hP% z&J*}7#~2YxAb7QH%{*dfSP_X1uU>Wk8VwnuW8i}d+h|KY>rj}UuRFRQ4j;{m$z+ra zt_QH2o<%7!K%MGG6Tz;Xn=~2&?>f5WcoususP<}jYu=rHZ}QF5foxv4tFMP?^Z@c>471yb32pPn# z3oI#I`j!qkJUt<^VpW&MA})lH^Eu`7vqL8*XlSZB!p5f7uMr*0JMAd{r;k$?KDC+n^B<2NQFv?{@Bc(_d(+tUZJ4R=|4JWu%Oc zqp703wYS#FfIZnmy~Z^8<3wS@#9q~sjoh(G3!vghj4e6E;80~d&QH}7B9wgQ<%Qbz z=0fM;Gt`i-DX!2RGq6qCzPo>Zkg#-;lKL_a6HHmiq{PIx<9~|hDBnM>5gOEwot3%F zyu|vNMDWwy;v3X1`sf`MTE@c)x7y1-GT#b>IH~#7JLac7VOisT#FmTHqzY?0)(mxy9N+kJLr+GT!q_!-<8qs^REfyYO zMRRdU<>ABPw_I|Xy;K}lI1C^ADj!bii_mEwY1P6t;qy5n$As6?^94 zAs7&ny&ezI`imi#ky z<#f0FUJtd>sz3;^M+ay{UGT|c|q literal 277321 zcmaI6Q;;q^6Sh0HXV%!ZZQCYN+qP}nwryiQGyDDaKKW1fpQ@x%l^k^LtE;;@ ziJ}ZB7#a{16ckW$B)1OG|Iv{Do154hD>~UbI5QaAJDJjZ*xL9iD=7psBKf_mC-jL> znV6s$L}u}Ij$FiywQucd{E=RE8wPm8!m+zDT@LTQ`vUIj)@>gDs_)^qAji%iLkph- zn!sZ;%`859UCt+()28OA#fISG4HSqurZS~Ai4OUiL)8f`&C!bD5z&{6yRewtG^up!x`O8%RuqC?!j=UI zQqY3!V#i>3naONIe=9gBav`O7O-D{{u-z_*^{%|mKUiM{s0dUsn7pgPDJJ6KNM%A; z1$xgB;!VZQ$oP1->lG2h6lW5U^FyyIWh7aMC z07_R^P2+h#7#07X9@k?Q+NGwkx|yQ$B?;Ka%^3%`xvAhc`i)QdAbKn|kvpS`T>9`S zSuCipF=XiKSD!iRyGn7l&EEZnWaOD)C8KW}Qezx2{x}yw-&d4@grfIG*|P=)0@?uq z0#f|{C57~Vk}`B~_#dcTB{_v_Mx>s8ePl76NP#UNx6+}NFyG3O3q^v*%eeotn+aJ zVVQm+$MD+mtvcMHX(M$SxWFgu)!X5zYjbCRM_t;c>~oghQy6vZk|I1%ifwk8=2}m2 zRoG}%VMlENt!4RjX_X7b1g|Xtz-1%c#8hbc6UE2)2*C}Lw7P>ZT$xw9KG=q`yp=Fq zT<7ILXw*e2t;bA`WCAX0abDzx0Jp+Kwb855!1*vnwiDkCUnhUavU8)HAaDhDo#Get ze`wmIa@%$PL!F0i~Q$gOdja_#p+S5VYNH z>pCRh5tG2tw1n1NNn>0HM2Bx3f;d5+4gadShNH%Gw9+^VZeo1v(m#6Db~ zk5_B}83dF4`;R?)B5&JbKl5#j|DEe_4JaV}KdT@A>;L~Q2m9ZuzLTkqGXwqq#@eMp zX;3C4hy(9@qfBr2w!fk#&Akx|*^<5i2{U&P*|L&lTKjv7FkOmjgZM0;=jS9PySRWp zuksW;Nbu^ez^EX@>!E@J*Y}p5aJhC1eT({1(WeWex+(by81cl9fQ(s5z4I)RP^V?* zC#@+ac+6JMWzfSe%R5HEO@Q5!rfqFdODj!B84N;hnenMdIwBN`eeMHw?IpTV9EA4(hIsiV1?|#_yA8`3&ym zTULqX(f0G;WD#HdeAa)Cn!o7_{6B$Co!&$*{yYA{{}nv$e>>dmolF@1Kb8Iqq^`E6 zb}s*e|NkkLG;KA^h$Qy@3B&ZQ<@Qy8Hoci5+%^gT62ljWcoob_IlJd!C2}OppzrBX z&*G6_q2>^9L)*t(KFAFso)#)#>BG_~KdAok@CcP_r512p8Btdj2qEnlBLnAC@5gt@ig@Uu1a`PF2Mc&IN3#r9rEv83e1ZQ@F)COvga0Xp3;KU^ssH7h|5vg9 zQ>&Za={Q`8HZtz}dIyJvgaFAX6RA>^Rb?RwWj=?$C`zhwUc?$68lu>z@d*OLnQYWA zHRG<3?{f%VP9xlc?n{)5?0CK&8lLt8X{H{8XFYM%{Yh%hx;}K>U3$ zciC`*-{+bRu(a!Tjq_!*>(+{MVcPB~)Atnlv!;!BxBGpnom;;nxW1hqW@~T0t^5An z-PLs5*E?D7x9wJKyPno}Z%KG1?bq&B7+K!we-FVC^E_g2WB)W=J?EPZIC&A~Pei

Ftg7^0{i;++=5PZ`*gf?PzUY<>>0) za@CL5hWkz{8)a5C%xS%M}GZyE7Fe7TYLMB_`+H^C?&7kY*;)r zo*;D@_922d_o4QsUhloxrhk0MKQ{PM+OTBLQCF7#eN`>+)w(yUuJ8M5s@?ZK=WYM{ zR1JCG_l^(vj&|QqZQi!zKfO*!o|qroFY_lie(|`_^4fWF{k$IsXkTLY`*QkxFwK55 zy7YOJf1K<8+#e~e(^p5Av(gN66yHbx0r)?_-&pk@sGE8>!N#4Rk1qE;fc9_e^6ti1 z&BLsxmb1dY;C^%p`KgATenEaSyj=9ZmG!Ympa#QbJ=m|E8X7hlHC2+8xvKxO?B#Ryz3_iv^WSJE(FE3h<@h-)hWmTy)<-LjoyE3? z$%7pi<@cP8OcL7PcDu27055hbtgugQAp>J_ME}!T;gMs#Z#yAS(pZwti3;zj58-F6 z-FbF&dGHXLdd>jmg})nxA5Q_9)Gv-+FK{0oeQ)(u?f4){-4u_Za4Bj#Yi6(XVvDuo z(MH(@;KCC1blzSkyUlIONBW`0$lKC5GK3aKw)wXD@i&jXDEr8(j$x4N5Hq#Y^c;zAW0Ea!q zh+sG_lhP;K9<$5DpBk0d$!GNgzn;I&y4oeEfLuRG>sFUSP{NRI7aciDaj4k=%f}Pu zq~xw|W!xLM$+Pj{w}s}{`>gWnHd?T#;sFxi}_%=*h!}eDEvsbvrz-xEc{b82zd8M&{fxd>o3z4nrR0hK z$lP()tTjR1PNt@9?5e(AyCza6LnNm+*>N>;wH(=jxJC(Ur|7Rm+oplV9LpM8a5dWT zbq536 zHD~h1u33-2FS#Bbb;sEv<{}yr?`G@p#H8iK$%30{3ee|!^x?lPS}ys5^0XqbVlb(? zK$_G)v-=U+KSf=p9Ni4UtoWXG5K45g}okiG}j+Vf|94HNnTjg zYb+KcczA&45bq4FY3>AO*I3rakEQKp7)Q}Zg@qBU3#Iu;@pu!|hmfmJ*IT%F&oufe zA`bKgdG4|n;}c-dn8h?EFYnOttI;SAwR{{op1R#89|`>YJ`ntF`^)Je@#3y`T;(8O zlux9R*o*(&ezl3U*wzA<2xR}|?sKr|c6=4Iz2Ik5iN9&$_vT+5#*{C*XZr=pps}3x zMu+X9+=~8H;M>rx4)Yqr|iXj0!DfN)yPO9Vb~m9KkRb3d7eC+W=N6x*&n z5KcDlsTs=a7d>~-h$?S-owPt?{Zs)K5d)N8O^&G^Q3mn2r{W^9&BMneIMF*#&KAX zBd(@rBTFlubqanpVo!>*HcSMLd1Zyg7P45`B}TJRH#^6ndW(b`DbVFkC$J58`!~2ww#DQAbvb=$gbf@1VW8 zVkuC>bTG-76(1>}e#|De@g48zZ|qL&N}ed)&;-vdx?&h{G1Q(5e~4!sCxMA~F`kg> z2-mgv6trCA1e%(?H`!On($0rx?LsH4)1(bi-$V~(F?@TP8$!zs^Pi>2-m@u^* zqwYCe(4s{1+(ep765$l9;}6+~0yo&j}Q{A!6VpgpC=i-Q}jhG43Gy@x3#Y^DWlK!WY=N zg363kS#P#eMDW|x8>_QmU4)f<`YtUXK|K9TxVI$^vqzE zC8A?{T;o09T0>@U7YViVOB$}c@Y4(vTYZNfkCXu78MWK!b=G?3KJ6E3bLd_EItwvM zCOh|+$A~*C`3DJW7!BoVDfu7hRn19g&7Z2$JI(r2)7)1Zv}cwNz($}w8{ zTDBYyH;UsW^=Y7ax-Or24_0;~j9=#t7z9RWI;NeM*tYEs@k7w%0!}QtH~SR>;6t?Q zdhJQv1NVs+vpvpUtm@d!LaIxmOcvj{uL5%K_#bXAr9#mbbM)P(YTUO)x{dG86O99M zY3}Uh*g}_+bTW0nc}YvS7)j7TG6hXK)1^Q!3D<)vtR4qw)#jruVYdY-UpVyxOH5@z zt{Qa_2ehigv@JmcWf`K<_4GGZhK2K$+Fb%elt7~e2@PGjgAviV&YV*Q2I*!Yz(&ah zAF%<&4i-1!`Ug}zatKso8XO-#+~i-6x~)o6HU6?uKRv%aFt;wSl{Dh0zMeiX0`#mu z+&)%*!r3e(78_wSw^aQh^s>FiP^$TgUT;R3osZ-{E@AGrW8cSzQV2kJu?oS>F_tCF z%U3;~irStl5be^-f2BhA`(E<1iG->j-v}t?wxqr$Fp!kYOkP6nr})P@S?I9$dM{+5 z&qKAo3E`AG0WZe17eJMV9Q{^Cx9DZYvW^INeysPT1UrWJKG@D035l?<4Erb^uu|8YDt-3@r?Tb9l@>`(QuiHPpe!;3KRCGAmzl zeKKtyz5PZ%7jrur#nAEuzg{8pEm+Lt@<9Wu1@_#WER~|&q2!zF^y)2h-!u#U4 zh!4iOIV+^WsnAQU;K_pi+#DOI4||IqiWTy{%Sxm^d|4~7dwDZf-<((Dj;nly4{3+n zuf>pf91|k@#Q|6N_Whwi?J14eg9Vo`-R~IuF*+Y(1RgzP1PNxsdIV#i3W(FoC(EQf z8=Hon@!!HI@@+>Lz2x|i1bl_)GkRDa?!XVHA<01T+$;8z#?;E%h8D|pIUGZIK{Ef5 zY;d2#GSYbKKN?pH#@ADd{c*f7RUm}~l6F1FXvr3sI?rfMe95tI$Anfqw8Ki+0pYbJ z`%kpni47p}S?N>%u9FVYJnw_7-J<~LZ>XJb%-Kb;{5IF_!q}IiOQDAq4n2AM-<}-1 zh8#+rm)uVfE6~fr(n+EDOtVMIT_jZNeiM#W1)G&Lolx)zGLpgAtMF3GW= zWOe&#@>0{PVYVXvIc>WBOUe1IrLB_;A6Fk=?#HsuKe_qm|KQJhTHOyUo3@Px9~$!W zWc*$cvu=WX&vT&Is~f{M&0A1rEd+ZzE&9`uWi1h+DG~~c2GkjR7?Oom`b<*P%Oj-% zdelC=;10Nch1~eg+>Ael9Id3aOX-YLlia_rP2klnZ^-f2J8FhX{xSIHJ#%C{ zbM-~RH_Uo?&%ylb_RwmdAEnh}IUjv&5G6$UD-!L@BKjM`IM>8;5`sV$4U$m z)oQ869y@bd#Ou0CzGgT@Xjyyl{u-rks* zWTk5XCTC4$OA8Bw%^vk6#Z_H)ZUK(hL@8AKF@P+w7U)gYl*UJhScbY)b|7E5aiX0^ zEnJ??sv@wQ^1C{(@&lp5Kivm5JM45Q>1EG#`i^Vx=)ChO?hk}7+U^pYGIQ~Mr8eKA z$Y`OU7tZy@*(I_1x9g@64mpFFbihGR^91U8JGg#SD%C#9FGiATRJx9ncl`&kF6xW} zu442O$_-!d`6WZ)<+M~RAn)P6isn1P)a5k<&hJy($9RnP%3FXT2!}QZ+fFW{3(DrM z69R8oTvbvclF!o!AXr>a-*7aSydGaBW#CuE`|X77bt9-oYoOs!KIx~0bD@z?u;Hp3 z6}4Hl9+>-%Mmd0m)oD#T#8y5aWtVd5qtM&?fs+w}W*uFBm73CcdffG~u{MH)J^5cX z7DqkSxy19%@HqF6_qjgf)6^T~kkS*7MwcHFx0dku&o1zMq^k})hMk0*c%RT*#BtaG zz|q2&;HZZ-ZJ-|1dq@qaG zxg7=+zB{1+Xi*6dD%HWEW^lEl7T^|LOHtm{2*1D-Bzm9Zebrq_pcy;(aH;Q9Jxb`B zmfJrAIdrVT^O&?+DL7$9P>h58(@a|1UTBr5x(;Uy#^quKa)>(+eT-cv5!wo$iDuVVc1Dlvp0Zoc1sSO>wcWLkgAE*L7b#@qPY-CW-(VDuYJTfA(fO7 zE$!z37O<2EK~a*erR`N8hS>C&^Cm_nJ` zEJradeot|HOPOyLy9#h_%*GnJggHl+6FzQNI$&ULm9A*8-fs!@4Ppx~+W=gTFd|DR zOM1Cm8#3%->+~Ktby4jmwG>r~l{Qg%@YU$FhdS{~U7hj|JNlV0Yo8XTX?PnLu0KSl zoyDZ}PF@(zcgGX)t}LmUM8Em9Tc<~tNJRzR5!}H2{PnHFa>C|NCh@~kJ>i)4#J7smA8x^I?(Pii>u_Tg zC|^#xlXE()tk%3pthXd#k0BM;;K9UxG?Y!r`-y^O3|gP16Os2Ex8rI`%ys_uMhkx-NcM{FlJQNe zZmM(gFE$Hcmv~X#zLO(>g}`{j@nVz>NWNihJLeQFa~7ixzY<{z6zjddci&IGY?5Ej zHcCCsI2nD0tqU14)v+_)UZ3RnX)YLNqT|AJ-@$7uWGDOPey4YS{#Ir>R=y(!-zs{! zXoBj@`21Mr7PCHYXe>NFrO-M*So(lfFDk&UcBKep`Mk!K-%738hzOcQYva>VMR)e) zBD|w-0@EAl_xod-3Dm#+qsJDEJH0+xv>RePrfsMUPWvefb7)e^Xv^yY)z0)Vf8P2` z$KOK6(Z;)5PAbg-xCcvKY4BhVLOeMl32OJfLvOjO9^4+76~>m4F!$uB(NL_;V!Cmu zck0(9wlJ!<_;VmlR0i@T`qUNf)65vRxQJWKT57ORty|UTokchbn)d^S9keUc)nXuF zHYGx5h^)D^27kwmH1rT}A!Y!WAto`~()!|^<0;RD0-iT(fic5{N0*;qYJiQCY(gs; zXRzctx=8m)aVeBP9pxs2FoyHc&eMLR7_x~D2y$elfnmhcXG6%)rMBTlJB{DXG7!TP*!Zl4oEfaJ-v94cI*I~+p$+|B6qW;OeR=VCOK74!bwMDjyk#{woxJ(ggS6 zOaf+31wUyL`8QR>0$A)bE;)U)3wz#Rc#_bGb-Vg?w!K+9nOLja)La+CcY_tV;OTgx z;UxD+6Tec*cB02Vx=hyIO0{ioV%&nqvR1*Ck|lMLizmxKZVg2uDaavpUGZLS; z2L4_1^J44Y1fBVrI~d%U7WU4dF+wgWSUc0oe|N?&vzi8YLpp@7aoC0>B_E{{=cV30Xo4HzY zb$hhfk3l%`H8u3q5TyoIZf(rF64|kPsqJQ!IRy%1+6B*gbvcK0>uKfmW#JXC42;9w~)5@ z^QgC6WjstD>Y=-LV;}CiBa#IoN$PF{WIly#T`zp@JqrQpEzkO9ncK&9agp+^M2UZ- zIwm$2*WEsujF=}3**y2(PnR7p^jgb3fxKD?tP~BHCy3$1l`7C0YWdQm?`i#x!doc| zZpTwBg4yFU)YOYxNxNR!w4-`TkVh0I))V|!yExnY?Kdx)@Y+*-6arW?Y5GCG<1rFb z|9s7pQ2WFKSi&#f3PIp8VC>p@HPLd-f1E4$QFrnra1PKeXwZtDyvMom zlS-bi)3D_Anjishy{eXR9i?nTbZRHLh1zteKN(~{r#Jnsb;BPOiMatizGn9DmD10x zXM~sq^J{fU)wU1mcWj)hk?OiurmyT!(if<5lx9YNHPf2VNn=u0MV5 z)zj*p_1QsF8NWNPoj7nW6T*0^f6nA~B(Pj*mg=@DQOSy(=rlD1CazKrJDi~|y4-rl z=rySvW}iJyeXnujniA7$)lsbfiO(rHlzybRjN$tUf1Qln0XO8C-m#!mPl1(on__Or znebOKL)RC|Zlu|svRoCtYf}3;A(+=(zsbpO6d`X?lW6Zdve$D#5&YEJAPt@Su2_0_ z_1W6X4WobzO-MOYo9SaQ=F9OME{FmRGNX9YGfGF{ifZ>^|Gi6&fNHCk`ep9)rIC7j zfZ^eHdB=iD$55cq0`V&<;Iw>5T_J8Z*-c7L$Z3=cZ{e>Sh6V67Pb`*P1X1N$oe}QY z(_x$|=1y+VV^7b0&TMt*rErjsc(rrUWE^kEfsxx?Rx0S^*eskqqU9hJ4Jcu@gp+b0 zVxce>68zC8IY=+wk~0=f3Sg2_YTB!#WYM%|2z49Wa#(Z^cHIBE9A1T=LOn%Pq zG!~Xt>LiKD_(Ermms%MyIP9>!RL-wij1Ls-{HkTGM5_#V*pH^z4V+?8idGO z${8FNPJh60=`>cJv&;EGe9E}APLc$lJbi1mwv5_H*Ea~7Z7O5CdHv3F<<(IHr4^2xzQR_YePPmUSksa4DNYB zhlJW^mq%CaRsulq4E-(LFf(|=nIuZ5C>BFI_K1^B|BStAB%Q@Z9aZr%itpjn3`pcOg?M9oF>dQg>*LUkRS#oqC4)Hi^sfB%_Di_ItEOsSycZB z<6bDKxkfv!Y>liCitx-@R+6OFfa)u9{-|gS>f6zTz_`tGtgw}M+^)@!_|`P*li%5A zmDh12eaf~pS89VCi=cb=i}a(mgchVUcoQZ&VOtFD6Marc~^})>n$Ktyo9vY z-ZH!VkL8!L7I#8u$aVI}7 zMnqj|E@?B~`GONAU*aLKbwnN*6lE#NNSPR4FmXHCu#C6Xr5=>QT3q%>&UHHs!DXF) zWu>8PYQf~Y=B$$W&r!yLk6 z14d2U>dOegf(y7b3JJ7AXy%+tDP{$zC?TOAZc0s5G*oWLxnkLsbnU0_)@?R}_3}I^ z=mqa_!ohumvotJ#7gUn*ITn|lo@okf6lLt9|HN6TsG0DRGa^x;5D$RW6OShXTGvhq zN#SIVLeZeOS-U%LI5!Q{WrcX1OWFBlmtNOl=fx;&(qddFkiL_=zU z^HOSM(tyzC8-`7;|6)8v642_$@(|2NQ6B?1bc# z_>3dQ!d%)tdMK7nQ8sYBn4O=Up9&#oQsk_Kwo1(l|;ZO{uTKws{d*FGdky0h@P~_BhR9sGK%Cd>)#UB!-nsG{0P!4Fc z26kXj;lN<_FZ^Ogtcy4KY>bwu%=Ama#CC`7XpeYYM>UtLNLhcEw2Lb9wBZaj3B z-E1H6aWd*&A8Daoy|LNXVo^xrro-#Uig;P{!R98#N$tQAUcHNl|1eLgaDqkdAwOgw zn{3WAgX!wsf+;`9e}cSc`@Y+Vd2J-sPyZhEx0AdKB6Ercg9}oeG(SN&aLKkTPbEbS z#U2h&DV*Iz%F(1P`|;>eHY%|APSG?iLZ0BQ!|_`N%k$77j2NDRZRUN!~8wYS{3F)Xc4|L zo@Jr?T2m!)-dcad{yay`QV%HK$~Q34vN6oD>+9{4m4d4l!z#vNt(Oz_Ji7y7W=R;QC9LrR1#3-wG!yomx#^ zd8OMEdIF?lbdzhv@R%{;ll|wFJANkNU>3RM>`N!f zzAG}KP(OC6S^E46MKjw?vK(FFENN>=5V3R7d|&jc>~f1dCMkTW$Nx1a6_?Dtlr0UV z38wjr;p>mRy*z1{p_Vz0!%S`;h&*qWP_hOA527}DsQ!qXUxH2{ zyOQb83HrbAt1z-r6F@`BZi!MBOqf~t6ys6nGwsExG$lERhwmavGFbdkpO-cZyP3RP z=5-rJLqA&-yWBsV>0p?E!g(X9Hb6NK{l>&rqqU7e6IeQP6EB0xKVt$y(OB$};^#2W zr_#nCSOtL5(pxb+{LMHEwi-8Ei7RAH^1&y5>!-B0?ekskrd#ql#mv8vX5onVpfQub zGFZEg)n4l}FUI(uX9E4i7ME1o0O~dgd}7e=q6KDuYxtdZDNR={4qx({GGXsaZ15hb zNjDI;W=5035LdKD=Bf$>In@9s5>u$lhYi#K=q?o8b|B#np^r{kDeCcE&$em3ZBKCM zJlNTKpRuD5(YHhzTWF_xg?K8*l0nsg65Vbvxv)v#fKzD}93P};mgWsE1aVJ0ddgAO zN9J4~bOabnz@m)y(3Z%akqy!Od8}4t&-JB~_NZ{Yv=)3&kCg0NM(@YZ=yE2+$9uY@ zj(K{30$E9lUS_GZ$IfL^ux1B}foR6_Vs5oKlH7dMZkm)eCCj-(P_EisvYUzb=n3c0 z)!VzIe7)RX)VGCIJ+ajnBaE>IBH6Q?&hz=4C!-mzZf3V-pO1A&hWx%D{LS$1S*w?4 z;WN(g6h}Xz=4cG<`55VJgd-t`q`L{D#YS1?`T{qK24rL&ngWnLm=qcpa<513^-Q-otNoKxWm>x(iTkjzAzdDwpzi4h5q0n3#MkkFph zyZ=NIC`av+J=pWXbjU_~n3HYNQq^$}k^>p0g{+n#{A1B53>hy*Q?SM0T5iT?9p$7EfJl+@+N6wSm)tJNZ=y+&wL!!`5J6d5P;Gv>uE zO&C>_VHkg@6dgZSfq<;4n{b(8lthYbx=U}}o7LBHcykt#O|+pBg%l;AX*8F*rp}Ks zHDkLqC)Rc;b*cBSbvQfOGb3B?-%?!8&X=yL4EtuM9n#fxWcKdU*;>X5G$#*eatK^G zh62M6WV^MzixyULA|JaN+=)@=+9iAk{?+a1ekfr!m!6jjCxHrch*0H=VKu;v4|U1~ zE6SX!j-4_iBbIqWNIVd&G=d&DLk*%nM;iKsSj}`QoslDHu&C1_#uom z-W)ZLDnsWjlH8UxvczJu0$e3yPn?lc9dZw8L@BG_Jx3QUHHmTN=wHfk$nTfhlATVw z5gPKnJF;GxFBH&e16-B|JPacb`}U|y(CJps*Td7uE6pkXoMt`m8~-yLhi#ebZ13aL z_t)~Ct+E$))s2+#mC#nQUcN5{73Wx8OXie(e1?-o$P7I=EjGQ0Vk~t${t1Av2vJxZ zw;4-&+RR~@!5y*jY(Oc!HOY0Zsq^F;CW=jv=(&voR(g^nrjO2gnA=Y9sH2d+wIOfp zfD?r=;=@@ytgty&l_41iKl`i&3+85?VEBPhQlk8&lCNJU5=^LqL!bSSBE zu@i9?DbgD?FxLw0ZRfX^le~nw>$b8!2xi48Tl7=|po{uDMTvn~3ES{CrEg>!`97xM z;T-k%#ofS&U9QGtD5CNk7t5gi@0XKE4J=;b0{MYmuQEcpdl6LbJw4kb1;Q(q$g1RT zAzI=!E-FXz=IIS_tg1=A{)i9UZA~kP6%iW{GV@7A-Qcf)e|+>K2w#FE4-{2sl`sAH zR_q@u`=NhM$&E}oaOMbUMG}0WDCR*q0tZ7ZTxbTUZ$(VOy!$8Uenk~&#_57~>l9rz z9q7h=xLDM(;5lzkX*hy2eY;(b>qMZWI3m(vR0M)+93Eop2J$D4sa2865S7$sMIRYO zS13e$_pqqC+at5!_%dQIEBNXprM!gwh_v$cGzgTS}ZI3skcvoN=o zapifwbOYz?E?C0NcRQ0c?%f9cLRFtLYlfv*l1HR&WxWf@`^@Viv0p0_`*i%KyFsNQ z*6lMImZ*j~LR>KZv*>b^fal$nU{M=8S5^39^(MHVLy{*)&>*8!i2grkFPdw%^_ep0 zZvM<~Ie4VqdlK|RSqxHVOgyG(rkCSnECXcHob!=jqh{oRf<#E`!e*itMmQS{CI?Hn!He`dyYW^R+Rr-U z?vDDn#DdxSB0hg~_+gK+CKs!d_@4B+A%Wi*ifKMTER2hEC8y(M1ZZkjOzeux1P{g* zKGo1m;#0D%?#arPoU8*R4#Enx8SFV`nI2NH{8JNF#dp!6Y09ZuVm~kyx?Npx`d@j< zD>HT;WsF^w`+tjAdAyH|;NoQwc5&J0Ahc`7H>ryqg>?PPZgh4TF<#xCBNOWPqS72t zbqXWqFW$IMkx~DBOux+kc$2q)@IW_S>uMZXtJ-!_9`CEcr9CQ9;kC_U<#U7PZl>q2wZZd;cKbPnXe~WIJRU!PEX8}pWa$Z24jMp)G0M%vx-W7m!fZuBJ!JPnmahK zXutbI*W>$PipH1A5R!r6lZry$V?$3h+fAc}7!EHRG*8a|wpkESphWk5dt%tMMI!IB zqBIP4z2Hck0eO8WYt-=#zo{KR1O;HrC-W)0@_=rjhtz>WU?y@YO&BZ0TyP|Vb~lER zjg@uXX0$>%x9C17olOk~HhW8g`|9z;L#v!L&6L{|i9#ESWw(52!cG$eCMJ=L*9!6) zLIVk_efy5x;j<5;#UleD2jJ&(X5P9DZ_p?Hg*fUmL5@is^eW?#_wloNu&l-zsg?e# z*IZ8d&9o&zd9L)aJrv0QZ7reF}k!Iv6>Vvm6um$vAsaF-SL<@wE4MSVcv2mA# z7BBhjD$FpeEg)lfqO9%Rat8Z>GVH247U~qa%vh&Qw+CgCnjb^JOtP8A%C=$c_n{2B z9n+c?RHbVgz7w4f@H4&N?XMR>>30myeaHyCXQ1fwMPQG036X^|4Z-jna5~5#HQKww zp6UIdjl`OuvJ6v$L|d*M0%~dP{e336EfYg4!#9sZjw5-Fr&V#iD3N$mMcp!<`m4DD zZ1X((_ryI$Toy#E=QvFK^xeT9)OyM)NuY5!+pEa6@|PC_Vl0d4(BLX&pi3!}G7Gsp zM*LRRfz3%a2>ouMK`0k}Nk87XcwZLpbo z8)0?@ojhihuLY*6XE{2Np6D-=r#e>G2)Xgqh{+-fv&%`w%F+{pZOetKRGwO)4-H8h?O+4I+_ckx6=#ZhB5q2X z*x}~e|GFC~De-KQ&tfF^+6xfMkp=2eO7)2vQsQe$`Wr}JC_324qdvs?t9kNjTzHfe zlz^~Qz4`S!MVG7~7Ke=L%|xapgQYinux!(y$F}lIBuq|V0k8GsN28+I9AU3-QTu$Y z^oNeKik(VH!tiUK@~cW$%y}`c%zOqRYpG(Ji$3pe%Susekg3Y%gC&P)C2VCA!;**p zQ$B4Ye>7BREqQE@Hu`SDcWVPZ2s%=-&sq}{F(H!=7H4)O;(ckrSM_!%^?VcfFJn)G z8e7zaUS;anRk5zXKT%fa(XCwQzzdea3RJ|T?ZOPH_Ou-IPF!3-QZfN|;>BFalgW~a zv?nbuxS>c|b<`c=w}SNqi73(X<`sGK`Y8cEo+~3m_&OPRkLbg4Q9(AFW(~dLkI4e# zvnOE27bOTjF4K?mtO+U32Y%kqFPtdI!|?8p;qAUT0qWIH&yp`L0zJ{e{07U);GZOX zCS<3`vIkT+SjI(>Rt@k!#y0>58e%;4yh_7csW_R-Ijbl$w4ia(O&U57D`CX3>kxXp zrUIo<>+@MAjC-Pztlbn#u0`=V!3m;j%ec^ZS@rd7X^8HBCqKZ+4!2)?F+A}V?-59+ z=DUx1@@AWQ|BQjAH)RuNR?|(Lt{^CLQIbUqqAwy?ia^#Y|5kcR_S(yTV6ebTwjQu0ToO7$(efo`E#gvdU=pp{1ZXGC2>>?RW1C!4;u z!-+$Gn@rR6r0aMU0HNUygy?ZcRe3ZERHWo zPED66Q|O}xr?kVIi&3@^K2`?#GusS|FA4VX_vIyR_(2*Uu^laYfMKdj&{c(JPkq|-vWC0(KgW&DsbcccB6(P@6+zzx3W$TW_{@LqY| zGegiW*F&431T~i9s-)%{iOUNwd^bOZ6wPxEjZ;9m!e!RKDZz2YtbTTk4xvxd`b@Yu zGCQv9#+>lXf7|~nIwz52-sqjv3T^Q%ybD@|2SJQ{E%ptN^drehw$|oK7WDA~%P#%^ zeK`~5sjnvlf}dBxFr4}2wLREM|6b&o(`v!uOfE+B{&il7rJzA9qTTdt>%*zB6s^>z z1xtG(VJX@cqNE-7^EM+&@*_DZQ0nW^=Czsx)5Ia8$uV;S!^7*dBs0%7l*N9#u#hof zk%efY{TFe+x?}nR=*LjM%JKh2Jcbt~f-148f*`fI?;?VJj$M5#|4Ks*5L<%Ij=0sK z4sAlrE#+CoXds8$MS0H!1|qe1v5=jCPw1)iA*GKGMD6$kg=j#R zQ)R)j0rQfoaX^_O8sp2NyF~fQPFpZ5&CMZI3tGt$|Ffzn6ELwe6yLM7*HP}FUndP1 zORoOu?M={Zg1sm+<@!v~TR}BpXp7*++0P2^;mtUqp714wl)Q$3SNe9Jcr;Y9hflo- zh>`48xs%Fd!*OJp8P*_;7TL9u;L$VO)2My}B7%i9mlx{ zeL(TFQ&wkQB(nkd{IgDO+1Zh$6a>=rN`B>)ocsSZ{Pm|NkF#0!hW%Hob}L4E+1pMj z#=88i*eIIn2W~7%Cq4D}H>>$b8CUxzYS}VvJI-?6PZVC#j@whqHn3SQhHIU859ymGbb` zX~AAU6=w224|;o@5KZL23H4Z^XwrjVn;uxq?qP!y1}|*xVCM#wZgK*8tToeiYjZQx zI%&tEwL*04we#~q$%l2cQExS&Xh&VYJv~1QYyck?Yer!ujJsq2xhSqSlm~T%S`B`lT{QVq+G)D5 zvsZYw^nXoxDk6vWN?6s8y*5Ey)sDnM$ktGmqXH)FhT1SC)s8Bx*cx*` zv3l4jzJ~5uGEf;TLg`&=PI{uBBX+pAh9Z@w+X3DCsx+pBmtN{HtU_jRkIBhJq)dK* zxpQ12DmzT$-;cB!dM;XYo*BeDDfJ0IU)C!$*-WG`%GkM4d=%e2;f?WQoftwXSCdQh z_u5*Dd$?VFR4QXK#67xZu8Sz%oPlnd_Qy`lE*b0K^@|A?EeehFzEa5K506B%ZsdH;E&%pm`~8T`=%VMkJ#n;zVu?%AM_oT@_nf__gmyUSGxL_!w0&`oD6L@|RJ0u`9jC5C zdlJ1LtdIN_zwh&X`G+ zHVU4o={A%mLO|Q%rsK{^xGQ~(}!;jGyCY$UoFnt2YNVr&K z;fp%IvXmqP%4qD5FYD`E7HP|!mP9OT44N(i;f0gy;jG$eZbqH7Ye^N3aA$MNQOy ztTroJ@;0>7HsT5JCUGBgVJU7I6N=3V2B;dX=eU=m3A`{wZa^|)M?APj^lP2qd`2#2 z;!o7=%6E-1jUlNaHl+7S_O#Q&jH(6E5@`I$7((Uc|FPWhlxKZ^j<0BasrDAn(j;vOKD>h$m(-cS zHYNm=x@ctuXl^X=>EO7%t`*%t=orKhMhv<0+T_7JfKnFF$qctY!LIv^V!Icmr*m*LP>wQ|JjW~<;tRLD-f1GW?eTHiL3Oz}e<_m0ZTO+W|*FX#&oeQONq<;I7P;&E@@;;pv8^j*qpX!B7=)L zvP!zHjOnPWI4LacP}kH9dzZ=Fl#F>PVSUV7T6r70|U>N&Zrn zZHhm8QTpvIW;00AL?HD~O}=<{+)_Pp_e&mISk6>Y&-g{t$7F;2R{Z@L2Y<~rZO(+k zZQLIynB9T77+tztL+18!8*~(1JxKxzPW9!G*OJJ+GjHt<(3rqKz zAe!J|CGm$Ky6w5;f>)+9DT6$%6?3wguE)>Q_4cRhPUg_ma4Wp5VBOJ0! zsMNwIU|2nymT>mW+&W_&tVAFbIcPD2(;(CZ<*BQ;licZ~*`)Y5OWcD&d?Fnn;!SCYubvz8Hh5n{3p6gtuNs`S&>jZy z_xd!4B{74YlNQXM)C^|MPuh=7*B4QZs+Bf#5vQp=cExIB9ZRGu6iB_Z9`-%H$gMLnD$UMi zw1`)TB>t3V_)naTEz=x|U7|BjY=+ITezoxdBD%;7e>Sx355RvgvkL}v@dIM`f-@Svq2dBeSQ3E4CW z$5}bFTN$XYH^EWH$x0{QPkY8I8aNY&2BeRZ3_qz!f65@`4ul5gwqPV!O=hMFuLY1% z?2ZKrG|wib7@jJUhFQ~+6jmL})*(A&?FAjc^0-e8EemYzLW{;05Uz3L$!tNaxh?PkLrw z!9n+A?853N=c|}-c!p!2)eTP>`HCHFE&QQr#o9-r%$Vk_0rn0J*ZZ2ECo{mx*6q++ z^0s2dRisdUQj=M0$r+W*%$~<2D?L$D>3wku>3C&Z!Mq0kH={mW_sa9XQWY#rYHli6 zhvQNpyxOz-2vSq8&y1c+hANxGHGWc1&st1@8@#%Bx(-Q%ZxEKXo!?Ue&v?oh_l-oZ z0j^)CT6NYel}kHl<^!=M5g`wdr# z$45j0Cb;#7Q@We7YWsvDlXCLPCt2^6G&1#2`HLcRf2!Im}fnkoORP9AjK);r}g_z83+Ro*AR1pny z;I;MoOniE(rRa|xT`J{6Z~|&F^%hv9tR1Qm?X_`ew?VqDTe5gn5F@*=&(YS*t&7}D z+D@7fZzyJd@Qw$)9yU{ruc8c9M6zUl&^&I?vE|%p&bTwiSQ*=$5_0b^U}?XE<3JW? z#|Xiru{d2zbb^jzF{ljR$)`%PnR%yO56bj*+eMj=QrOCSexA}J_;eUo-rnkm*nr8% zB?GI0VC7ucZa2-ekrnpdh3Aq(ADlLYW+me?=_EDm zym}V;#eew7w){_wGy~9k>OS=FEf{?Wl!EFHd1+0Lo$*R5OCH1!=*t?!q)vJ=i{R>V z6%-9~dTrPtu&K-0!R56MTN0ZF@|W2R(pQ)N`n>xRLo-B^+J$cFLR z&y1;@!2Yr_%~$J6IqFnlUmt@~^_j|G45jaar@{|Rhv%vIj`nUn<%w-ruRN=C2NDN zU#h)j=9{CBU&I0gmmj2CLwUenbWZ%vyH#j559Hx~?fv$1nj!WnjkG@YD_e%{$Ir5s zA)OHE3pb;Ey*v|_ZTofYy00JOVER&6eQ@UizTLQ*R?$~q{n4-W^1u4(t1sK~y?5Sw z=k2c^y!+mJ@4fxYU%dOSPFOw7r+gi9lDDqkA}2XfoArD1{GGcGc;bGUKh>B|e>hP< z;D|_&&EWTuxpJu^=tURs4<6VX-uR)6+#_L(zr?@8wzh>RI6LsCV~y2maz#-Flqm^= zs(gvr3JFv~`yL8pCXXXNk#h~s`0`i08mH&@2pn_b1W0&JCAwh#leeZr|1#S&HN z*uX*y{`-Ib=U@I8>rBu>-GvU3g7l%#```Zq4oMv{(GT)PHetv`FQw^kO>sph>hw=5 zrwSG-lxlKOYml)^U)5fgM45(IBgQlD4(}p4L84f{ur$#0| z6zZI~H9I&_LzQisz6>Y?`g@u^fEUlLMdi`m(tJf)^(UJXN3DX~JZZ<$3GDpT%BZ|z zT4!V8lj((7NcJ9-&j@%s$&Wa$annQL-DOckCN@o=2+^tP*+HzDJh3%k{F%%N)NKj@ zI(1T&(lSWeA{Up~%QAvcxynR#w(`#)n>O+$DZq)vIk7?g(0}UL4msT_#5WHFbdm#>ZQ<{`ozGCkwg`YhN^c{ z1Aee{6#D67cm|0&r7iA$f1ZmBEI4)gI~uN&Q=H)3ql7#hgLJR*G$?+KAFu zqEa%WLl|p~m1%$7us^mPg;~94?xwAVMW7Kmr?+)@@?N>q^Hpai;%@OpQ=Au-F!Evb zaHbD?02y{3%NI(Nzr4h$Sg}c8<}9(u3s%iv-e7A6i)0roerCAGF6TL(Y*yo`~ z#SsbmpzshdQDl;QX69_NoUp@*5+YvqVIB3N;3ROSlI~B4D{=~xh>!ctEDI?a@Pl-Wa=RJ~`JO|~m=+wd5K{GV2SmM&UEV-pJ@=`A;|gb&=_ z&?0XfAPnHf7r%aOc8^D(Q!!0XICeLBe33bPf3H1o{;D_mYL%!pJA^!B&Hb%W7J_B5 z5))l3`ZkyFM6;PpWnG|Ul@ft7sk#fRtHNxhe^apZ3sok^{A~vZ5Cfi?F!PCgRigE^ zveJAbR~bJBG;zlG(=C&GkmvLM`U}_nZ z#QmF57;JOZ7MR^Bv?o%mahX5>VPRAfpCy$jyBe6!fk zkPMvSlp)XZ##O$(&+m@{S6q5IvzWC1uQb&@Oyp9WnkvuYgu^;+=e)_UGt zd6`136;n4fux8%Ca`IgV3hZ<-$|y0LP5;q z+>sDCPAV%hFfT@G-6G}O7qd@?n9QAJB#@6o=RCH-8La_1A5R;H z3JsTck{agC(*8dTFod1n?@4t){-cyXG_ztlAlh`ED~o($Ssn5>H=J<#9EGTpPiQYc zp#^pF8E1nR$wQ#aVKLrw$H_pz%ShbA9&;o>{a z&DyCMoFU#pc{;R~KOX23LbECUNYM#%R$cse3V!;NKQ*B@_yMcQ({&->&99cL*pk2N zGx9%f;TKY<1Mqe-j<7FG>#NVj^`Hb zF@yk@TrBx=DsD0@Q+Sf}_hLEF+yoWY?`iSwj zE9vkLZI^&Xu@YtdCrj6t_EoLfL{B>w1LAZ6*xqw6m;!x%oKYk_Q6?k$jsi~#eVXKo z;plTJpzvo~@`1I$mlcX}FWe)DLNb>)kTWm=KOrmHh(a4qjY(5^c{yS8gzj{lX+}Y( ztS1b9)ik&&KyiVqAL);URsoU3V5_2~mU6mO7Mfq~c(_iGhQPs&0~&})G-cRwBD^o6 z+_Z2_3Z#W4g@9hs3jBUGEq~OU!obMn(s6;FBKh4rpO?qAhiDzuliVQvKt8c=UOcUR zXY5ZD&Ctw0Egqjk;HP+u?~6gheM?By2;JHJ_kMLxq(W@6XqG{9Qx$W7eltq_s$&vP z;dqm_$qGb0605!O7?S`JO>~9T-C3FcfB)#?kBg7~_|9x@%A$C1@BS~|WHV{0z2ZyX zb)u835>-MBpgayES_o(f40YRYPcg&(`Io=8v?V&47Jpra>|OfyDYxm!JBzED41P;=3xvM83nH5R%)d>K`K(p2;t9y31a)A zOOJ;8&*rpjFaB1Z#@-WK=W+YzG)Ai!7PhrYiUrRMmheA2nk?^o<(`lP0gm5vPMS*1 z{fft4JcTWg&))dbS9M$b0Xs~4ljZyJxYgf;{*;W+s#wz>9`V<~o!tlb?){P$=odFC zPa(G>Bpu##=-{W3`KD`BK(Jyt{5RzW0AX|m9S?D2!L0*nhX}vkgHY&Nhcx^ zZ#a%v^>JiGq(KgkGprQWB2AH}ZlsCG??@}YWE{c8G3}6EnQsPQt>?VwezLMxiKv{K zdX@J)_o9t4o@uq7C8uMBzt6z~00b`7ZyOdG0G){a^eT>x5j*OBd`&A-)?b8;OZUCm zDyf&!xax&UMBN7cYem=CZnT|MGcrQGd>Kuu(4px2`Y8&P4G+7mvU7MQ4xr%lHG-vm za`7ETr|XZr_f+i6QjkP8JZe%~#F~om`|F1Z+nJJ8RKjJqU^B)wa<1bw($LRQ7rGl5 zfy)7Ms`xT8RRl{BRP?Havp!6#(G86Br;Y4yi%S4n+gW-o_a`&OxH%-}*oTmfO6$xE zM1Y)85!qb<;{F+|bOqpr6#j(NC)2QDc;ml*^!b|w^owKK!}obdBaO<~AvE%^m;! z9*^75YQQvOi1V2%ew$T}Y{= z6H5MPbMbF9hrRX%`jk5S;`84`4(X1D&Uc6`Xs8%60*}V_48e@3M!2yfAx_0vU9U^# zv|R}ns%I@N?w6w($7;&}F3`Ey6lJf_8t*d()POql`Ih}0 zgF%=wulQ(&>rD=uIA95!J9WayYIPk~zqdG#v_o0pJB1awc=;@#scQrauEObR6f>!P zXL9btqyhD?Z1FePzCKI!Io@u$j7|5kqH#XM1|+l8Fjxk|Y;r7gcGV8~I~`olXMa?8BpzxzMiI^tul-Nneh0Ie0|Cs zXg^Vo?P6P%K$PZ~RmbPuk$p+$BYXKwcI)_V51sw^F%oNhCbFZxN0n6a`B@8BR3znA zmdbI8vyp@gx395*){a-#7>P~0(L_ZP>{G3A__G%E2cQM`T=7I^u(>-IYyZmb>xBO6 z7wId=*HvSbNWq3PF)+dplc56_>0MLj$lpSyj|?KkOq><*IZXh5v*(->_9w$|a>0iJQ;kDN(|SOXpGg(mnuzIbHbXuBfrH9ZY$%C z8L80ywxYm;JpLtoDEbn21JXm96C%)7PPtwVY#zw-dsyfk21bp>blaa(;3K&;_}1dM zN8hOTO~0uBHW5ou1eiyFuv@AnWv zM^V=4rM#{pkE$3&A8aM_w#Xb14m2}Q>u&J{yL)PD`Qxk;R1w5aDC)tAIfYuWFd(WY z%C&ukPg;9wt~+G9YCExbni<6PbmLY)T3TW26LckOz{~?AD@D^xePW@_1lb$qE;D5B zejtT?CTQV%+oGEg9<=aFNMWOw2B+GK)FPtsDo2@j-nvWHDJ#wdr(WUybSUZ_JAO28 zJZgubzl}=rmqOhcn&ML)#Pi}mlaYGA_;jZm_Yvw;_wT(~yq^O8)Zm-|A6%&`x%$Ur z%TvJbyq2JNny`|oq{t*KffkNP0!fVa{$AGW3e0P zk!GH`aQ=vY$=Tnx*4mG#DoQe|f-0Rsx5ccitc-}g*ItkBfjMq>@?m*~?e@TLDR(UI ziWqWO7UjBZH~O9WE|5z6lbZ;~W}mJOl4SbT$^nAmwUWlS$V0Ti5`+t5bTepeeTt^r zUT{{lmk*u43wZ%@u)rkGamh05$jM;wILq{XW%J_uUZk>+l8y}+llQ0|09J~*SoCM( zDf6yyYbjD0fKh0IjKZkFwbZ5@86MTVLw0)__bI4J89Ac6=mJA$D0O;$;Wk}J{H8Vx z!2J{6PJU&j57v0x3xadAr=J4cim1Sx@xvB2f+SD|~T^dy1d_#lIqD@p6BvKJOzTb=sF%S3pkohleHkKteHT=_%H{T{fiy_)ck z&`KQ+=U-I{zY7)Lt~F3arN7CO${A5Eh5HS;zDN2&d zk-H20z)51kPOt`UW1>ce-(z=`zboeoItZ#{{hA}5+kzfWsz%`~3LcHSLnbp5QVhm+ z9;cIm(Z*D`2XhS+Bln7DK)OW|b$SdNwbl;Y-uZl}-YGUbYj9<|l*UPD0Z9U8jMPD4 z=3&Mx3l3{EcDr&#y9Ey$=`RgwjsB{Z>=L3&*njYNZOrNNLaQ#f;1(~;K;hR7+`=tD z$%~^NSe$XV_2k#dhX7XL^k){9g2)A^#^hOYT!JISau#c$GYzFs8GyJmI#D#tB!Fb# zH)9#aPKl^)g(W1ZNKh?i+20>)1vZ;WxdH4{f>S&dY|8eAMrnJ$jEU9pn?!|>r5yj0 z4`k}z!9mTpVD~Pu!tM*PR`l91Jn9{>Tz+3~kO6I>;d`u0>0uv`-0FM@{gz2zKb_Y8 zDFN(}zFM9CSrBDDg*@4pJxRIf88nb?1IKqwn|c52PeHqzOJd^dKuk5ZdeK75I*-x= zLNkcs>sU8=9}-^dt{)KRRGfwhEsd;L+p*iZCX< z)nX@^G_(Hs?(OMZV5W%Pv0p=<`Rvd2#m8>5O0{$uSB@pS!?b~LFR}nAOu%g~l^q~A z8+Z`6Xl{iG99zlfUyp*J^G8-qOq&=0o&QC8BZ83eU(m2C8TT-d1kiMqE-TworM9*r zQOZn6I7%-YZ5&IJoad>Jz!XooSDb%YJo6cEiL^_uy4?E+%GAv7ChoCCrPO{`xYl$<+G&pzSRC0WMF#+iaT*xp64i&X;TE7G9 z1OC%dys{6RoxKq>wTKg%Rv{QF6ro&F)co_`Q*~5}@znKu!{KaP6lKsOlTY>G^LmY- z9n>*&#OBw}Ad~DyOJ!4o8S$wC{+`Uh0_hBgPUySAT8^6B4 zDuQ-W8QSG}Q&=Q*Qae}U>-D>`wcdO@(4`$?6jw5^f^hP1>l-xmW{XTkmVCWy&c8Z_ zzI?1N5xY*i`bETy4a8TtD6E!hhnrVh{Jh{#li>J+Y|0p0A37N`4h??A8ggRNh6ESo z52a542vuqnC&q=e`xK54Yb{k}QJ?C2GcBjkufw>79>MPkZ?YXR%3c*6jNT#E?DKw( zm3>s`CbCX}Ht6;J7_w*vD_pLAbSJEvTE_VII5TblwDie$eQ?z9^dD4}EqNdkcrNk( zPNyIglyVl!iC#xHmujb&bZN17z=faK93*vb3f9XP0X5c7KD8086kt3>I+c~hp?Ut- zaR^FG`cIDis3R!!wu&3bac68EfA4MmQKH4Tzdhci8q&cl))EGItZ+fpjltybCk5N?XO9vsoO;f}Gb)he3N~FKWSmK$X1R@cD`lFfIp6O0_`vp2#2Z z5!TzV{Js=Y@i%^tqw2D6As|8f63*lY zBmQ0fG6oXj& zD94#J3^(ANvUA-_t67eAvC~C$hCb#IJ#9p@@ zk;y+RhtKO0|1&U7EXxUc^x`lzCep?tVcFsJ2;YP z84LsvIzK__hn)@x*)rumD^SLI@z#ft>ODwyU*=zM~ zJ3$C5sUFzBFkKdt+r?q@jJ~EA%WwqbL%%AROHQZ#4HvxlqW3tGE+P#Q!L1;R?Gi5N z<#NUf^xhDBh(pD#!c>|p(88!`YVd7ZlyZEh*}&hvt08g=O~ zko+(0;!p@DY86>CfM|gO9hMR{u}a*++A;d}ny9o@7pZY?_A}Gb49h-|roKIm?}y6G zlm;OSDZe7j6;Auv`B3%>_)XOH<0eLhwTsOF|MJnPATT^%Z03v5>0Z$Ab`sXLnrI+d zW+#3XGPQNUIp=AfQ~yT!jM}HJ{=)~+v>8}qW@)3&ynH=Ba&!!Q^B@w%3+@|)!i5-Z z2ogpQVCRR^PtH=gdadWI?HH;X==6YU$a5%cS`nw!pMp60AT;IcVyKv*@(5VMaNE(n zI^#G+#cKrTx!@xh{7ou1iv+C1r#{@qMI90pimJkJvE{cSoU?pBiH@8PtbV8AIo+82 z=qv6J`mm5gnsE_~hGzIYNl9CaKu4b)%whxbo>BSmnN>_oYotEcqrR_^fVehBv%c)* z%$3Slc}_(7F?9RU(A@&Y*2sZW3i%-%+Cw1ald0@4goOOtbB26? zE0+TSB0!v*#s2tr+0(DP%JqoJR(KJXKCt$StmVNx%`7)2=7b5ao}m=7LeIBlSY4blp2;-&;!jlk|K81pnFm;%%xstgxL&e{AZ3No zSLB*Ni@=&;VbamlI#>j*WSZ?-1rKG21NQJrJQ<`viuM2bB2VcP_RDip*KulgnQE6W z7{rl9pNT-!TR3jIAZyLb;%VwX?fhkTB9e;&YBH(lpxDYWHK;TDZrV1X;-NBGUmt8} z*W@Oi>`na;d%42}+F&V!06 zJ}Vof6)&&RLJm~AnClJc#|6)TAvPSsN2X=_kk;*N z6#o6o{}GGz|Hh{5JVZAnlYGfgyc8Eo8YYa%_fpl4I%>)hHZ#{|lFv9qfljg-pprn?spJxXA7m;jxT# zduK$vl(Cy}fHp7)m*4Rf@7||de|$D=if7%lp>NUoe;-e4U#@e8_$$|*m3I?Ay&3Z; zA$_M5x;wI0BLhz`hT&8E@gVNLjo+mw>Tolpe&vQNQZ#yEqpdF58fmC9?(?uj&3MkD z53FIi_1adj!{#=1=9AvI`NX85Gwac9e7J243nwUwfyp8)|;FYtv14V<*V(0L0*6IJ&zQ94TCB2f!Q zQ#%*aF03pFVY-&#M#1Zbs!xUNq~#{mQ+7vAo^?$f942t^uVE{QxDn*GTl16IYu|9M zxW{JJrMq7wy#>OQwCOuc!qo!h7Ndf(hFwK}*d_L$`_!M$Wv~y=YFHLDV^u<^(YQh zBK_B~G9qf(gcK_pd@#I~RlSMsnPz#CzV%X^sDlf|dBV&EtN%I6>GnEyOxcL-a(pZO$F@e?kACwU;N180MWs} z?DKH)ZRO-_ea)#AFvp)Ib>5e}<*#BqU;BK9Fr!)GowRsXNhYDS7RjDT1)oWGHJbVu zYufLEzO0)lON0sq?pCHMCoKc%ktSsXNda{m+>JC*8p^q7e+3AM5EoJ&Inn`vOWdZT zE3F%hyJ*nqOanj)h(!7=QEuHR$KL=9kb_%n`BvXTP;us;XRPCeV#!=&SSHn_TKOeY zDLwPP5GSD`SKqgdxnS=lC^9ZoGR@n4#5h(pqeCPl>`O`*ih{HF5>GxnFSp_}p+5?Y z<%ax_q=d8@4Y8>-eFS)g)&d5FX)1l#h6*^YsQMerq`Ccobq5T>2Z_DRBKiQL6KsdC z62sU}BU$^Aez-Q!(+# z0E3|k6_t|e^la?c!t0loj2`$L3#a{C_538Um)ti7>!bl|*e>>58ijY*x5Fk`wvE_M zqIWJWKb)k`9{*yQQ!JA0VjrGRm8;paK6Ok+SAo1(Jo@ZeaVKK#K0^<$-4)NksM_EC z4uh%J4mvZ54S{oK1a3*G770Cxl7$a6f#-m5?IVmDyQ&VvJ}OLwAqTpCDR5EcWKx%s z&+7&w%25oxY}*O@NBl3`iadFF1#Q6O-)WaGKSEW>CJ>&fR~pXeRWPr*O(!U26>H(k ztEg}RD!GggNCFsZt+%AH8*C`kHnKpr-q<-RSm6XUvB*+(-yxsBhD|KB#!Eu6ebAwS z+fvE>4Ao_HxP-BhO>IbzlSAoOPan_FPX2tk^DB2&JWagj9?OS!{cv}sX36GQLlL4! z=_jm;XVe>7r8dj@dri4^60B3g2+lA}Nw9=5VJmxzH15>0xb_8RpdCg4|6&hU6dihZ zaUH8CJ$v~I;?n^`Fs5JBz~tBcYW@w=k%B1|l^fB8Uy`8nzPU2t2KAk3G2KYFz*LzV zQF>Qv1ATlNAXmXA%7FbX287lhAK|{JP)9z{+jC}Iz|<`l1yjoAEFoJYYlv!h5R9jnc7X{twtv_;CZBlXw&uN;~}Aq_+YL5-uP+mp1<1K=T;WUUq8B zCJHiK`x)xSSu$bjPQm>WGXWD!40-{#=cIfz2Ji=!Y+?9>HS)jzC^J#1s0^wRRapgq zxZtsxLckTHdH!-EpeI;Qh@6>l4Mc_$kH@E2(8-1g}Y={5v5hfB1)*TLNKnL7*^@*J@lp$l@igVpi#~9 zvf_9o*E{v>zs&YpYL$Ppmnl$vaJ$tp?D?M-MBROpR>@e01;&wyBOK+Gc-Ul0D%Q$2v=pHl zo`kX`lJ?}c8Tejr@Bs`Gfu^e8%niOG1ijg130yzj?hUh-ww0gx@Y z0J>EYpp1Y`3|hRy4@N*+UDS);7!6{%rFLs_K9wn*5i6v8KDwqm9PD@s8jHkh`QO?a zc1@KQ&Hl$1w_Q29jA?QHU-Z8H>O+i1d^oUF;xOYC-m;DL@u+O*(_F@r~lA{VV&=;+ZH5+&5m|eU`Zce; z1bpYMcit9<0E$9UEpSq(>prlmQhb{V21LIt+a<`m{paYaf7Pw~sKZ0}_xsMT?GJ{! z^x??|Ctn{tdjLjeHT>(3KA;r-Z!sG1cjMz{-!%lIC*IrZP&1L2Kll61UVTSi8vYPo z_-A`1ex$wDl8_Imxd~_XrboJNN?VXJikLF=A%u)71LPme9f~lVUT52#P*0_qR9-{n-qL@L_ zVt3C3md%kw2vq(_Z92G3_B!=>Hi0_{73OX{JE#()5dUbsx)W{_n2=Tp1McG=5(k;o z%IrnVagw%TS75Z-^&5h$iG3S_kDakz&B-n=b^W<~{ufp6dr%Kmr!bX4Jf0}mQ3lYV zv_h5HsxBa#UcRgdG^s;j*$W&DDqt|d3Ug3T_3!vG?TV%bNU&M{;gSEI+ zgs?zGB?QuMwuPp%i?+xT+x<6sON0T{%_4k{ z{bb`OXc=`?w}a5@k#GWQoXXwQB+P?eN{T!sD_#$j4$(@oR#4<$t67a;%W&&Jce zEft*?3&NAfto;=unMrL#2O)&1whnSbDdiy=Ag|K5=m0QU5Ea2x&HRRWBGVRaSl9}Z z(%OmC{iZL2*_M9yG60a5q`a=g*B3BLkt&}A+4EgG@2?+O^>$R#Qq|c^18BiZ)gBXU zi~&}@fj+=3O1Xgr5E%ePnhj$)T?~BiIi_7PG6VG8OqDRhU|G=}+-`ff?rOCprvK31 zG(?YeiO_(kX3EK_`pGYP=bw$_e#K+tGbK_Qp8&!9s3X~`71F2KQww{L=O3+oIra!b z#|)TvG<7oDj4hq3MK(PeCmEUs4Wrg(CsZVnOD~xd0?r^a?@PYIavkuNrfKU8sfcS` zrq}(rq3?qn%>YtBt-q9z^T&alGCUa))g}Hr6Hw*kV!`nupU%`Dnr^@57YZN+Ct{pF zliywYt$Y81uI*R~Q*fw+RPjniR#d-xzI|4IlA0;3SXPu)4L>sS6VH8#Xp1yhR@LifLYK z`6nx_cmBVI3u4PtU-jMje~A}vIhMh-NjX5;j$E#D9)XMru8#Fa zI;3U8QqT1&GiH%!SQQEVab-aR`+bp8hBZa+H+*0BskCTfM)lh`_qGQu9Y23=(D^bS z-2?qDK4;e2jlJIDJ&PQvF+_Zuy6gBA-n;l-CC+7UG?!6Pkf$q-<9yOtFvXp%i?yRz z;A_R4@1K87D8Pe0kv|t`XD0Upw=Z)cX<0m}{-fZNaIht;K+$-hCD*AxJK(T8J@+An z7!V(oL~ef+9*zH;fmE$&xG?R?`nyjujxDlIl)rA6s5(4UrAQI`JM3QIKdPo2h5%L+ z^gvXRlvOBtESW@%ypd}eXliJPOPUiY*7$ek-NcvdMAs!l)687ZBK4UJJa%zXFNf20 z=MO}`Qf0_a;Y-Cn?LtU&U&M)e|oHn5+s1yXj0;Z}`N-D)kgsB+b?>~yh2UdopGJ9Azxr@q*8Wgdb z7$}t+&K45jd(}ylpvmqb6;s^e@zc5=YJX~LXoY+5w zDtRpimkVVdAC>yZ`Gk&j*Dx1#6WpfudR%B7mvo@u+|lot=%2qV+kJ;B4>uSzxSBml zYft+%FSb8J00(n#urFkY4roC7&r8fAkA9mlHNv-h)D+Lk=2-eCE0CCMj|HihAbcJ0 zALXQ_C{s>3YiNY(7v?)F+4SP{ZCZC-lwTQyiY1kC<0C0IR~2MY4n3V%0&mY`Ke23J zeIdc=lT4#GjClplUZvK zl)Jw6!G7jeT=|n?+JjQ1?QanuoRNL`6NnHF>4`D;r4<~7>eTf3EXD)g zp9)#}h4i399a+mfS{3>~z}UBwS*3r3$0<)axcuJ!sSPY2&_WOQIT=2lRUjh@;`MUxbZ?rKFdavmf2QNC9b^+x4OH%vPHXIDKPDrMEC zqZr}jFgQK;D{P~2MbWb%U=6)CUCyE&d|m>zU?Gu>WPaxE$QwZ+-6l!inLi>Su7l=|;3x zUaCf$o_>Y;gAP(|FmGZdq^TSfgr~TmwscO!D(av5ooLKQ0_}X#tj4#Wc4uqxIxij% z_%ip350S6s9*hG9h}zvm_?Kh|;zO%K?Z`y{rxlJ28GGyJPL0bajuDCnjM6OTq~DLd zJxZw+kPhr6pb|ZbI8)~PN7evSLEAoVIGle~NuKDxndFIXZkHCe3SD`-=1fzT6Th_G z(R9hof0-e_s4X{Wv1y6A;BsC$X|Rf4T92BEF546Hf`NlZJp#^`X5qAZ)Uk ze_p%-44)6H)#=iy)updqnG+Ci_fKoWnYLKK-4x#8KPAZRw*HfP)#p<+DhZjInWn>P zYY0fL!6Anh?n=qP0cX(Nl^%ENax^DGbkDm{2mCh*V)&Mw$bWdAf%Q@rcnHK>Hs^mj z@e%#@l)tKT11t7m}JHWMe7H@e!40iKYj3E zRs8zlLo{Hkdv}XY`(bWb0xE9OMjQY}4^vyolDHAfE<+mD8l0 zqZg$hcH3woy1{|o!Ba7K)j)-ZRcK(GF~yY@i8Bl(t&FvWvPlo08R#>OAWlR(yVsmM zE}3o#5B$_G+%~L#y}p%-vemnM=lD8iVoGKG!eiM>{L4|WR8x`KzvWRAgc4AbM9o(H zJGgnYp`KQ;IGTq1MDsDoN>eQt%bjeNLB@aD!l9RhNWk$crsXY;n}Ka7d}oE=M*~zj zTGE}U%7(&4bFr$^9krKLS91D-Len3-ZSgDY&$Cy3O;{zg_&UD0X)OkLUPxBiLDH=AYB)k40@os%c`yWd`KE~iSaee*oP(zZxI_iAJm+F`X znOi1n&r<{lD9v}JYBcs0uAqauXE8Vv01o} ztoWc-hL$O>sW<^9ZH${TE8vho@dpk3X_ zL3+8~hgew*A$iN53`_BWpR@B1AXNcrwEwJp3tMC2K$sCT^5is=!^Y7c_!$`*LtE)? z%o}N!B$3X(zY}|GW_0gma?I%)GN5RXSg}k9@BYkx4-O<%e*km%gJRt_*)joRYnm2n>E{~nMn7Bk%;g^zRf+;0Z6-o=rR8;tCcV#y-^ zqL69MK^EzSuhl!Bd8$8s?7(HwJX7MZ3Tr#W(XobX*Jhr5kDmR4uTkDpXU!XJi8<}v zb%=um7$)QHT%MHD6D>?(eA3P_C^fSD8;1}sXD1AEAQ~xfOs;;Orn@;yJs6Qo%)>Ql zU+F=Sh)G?iXWARyV!1dNExtEs=J?H&>In@+IzG>End<$!-43Wpf=Nk}_o-9hN65+s zB{?cmt}o|_g5@xHZvJR^Rw92rdFJy4{0aYx6jS~`KIwq8c<7f5peZL$O8>ZrLdN7Uo`dNH4$MSXngG{{BJ9y{m1+2nS{8(p>Pu2W63IkY?}Hu;~9p;Y6$v;|a%A3=qZ?P=|Pf z)+f4y5PKDaihWVzWF1K0DjPsZ0ZbK(VO~nTp)jn%3*~&fMQrLvEjvu??Ol;V2g^Kx zOR5mGhMfr=hsxPJ^gG*synYF7`npM@bs_pfC)|06W2?7LepFu~MyT7rTSIPG(WR9v zzo^(?3~iDUayU{ix`&O~1>+O&to8?EL2>vc+mZ0nGWh1cRyFWEf;p-3h9G&UfaeV7qHO;4Q;e^s^}k( zR#!Z^M}HKb|9K1%i^z{4>|m*J{>etA&uT#Nt4)%`RM_vT&ryB%c@*GhaeezGBr^lX z_fjX@apZB!pWW}e8mCOKTFpDN^U9lDdhW2eDFt6+R5AjTY|=8T!4X^fzi)o+33rtWJQ? z83xwaRCeIRXBtkb)ACS{tWgkfWgc&w*#yNk3CG&xd+rsVp1(Ym14oK(efsiTeCa}C z!MI#onHn_!?NmM&+gMYU5oJh+sRq4{xY{g#O~$1nWtg#`SizN{QEQ<_lPRstVtHHC zn3NBE*RiY{E%gB+vybyX*-TaVr=V^NonDwc(!D~2!&257NE$Da79bU5{D$w#keTzg z#(kfk?AGE!6i`9awq&KmI}~Zt?}fJo7Mwk~*aeJlG6K2)*rmY{qU`NSDn(`4T8o^{ z1uFv|y7Y-Gm?Qe77*di&a>I021nY6z73nTuBS18Yl^P|g){P7rgEDpmTbH}eFH@|* zx~hpO*|SJ&uSe1LIuRS!v&_Ej#r)Eho4Vbp$) zu^m_mpXGj$8Q7sg2QH=nnpPsKUey;zmbV{ibhY-FHU$XJ8x_KFirx@i`zl8i4>aLI z7X=uY#`1q)e$Kxhfo(B@2f5DD83P3Bfv7qK@5*U3^Bc_ z{P!fMAK1Mp5~R?akfo^l1hL)$2zE0Xs5ScecQNdePK*{m1l7{ z?aP4}klj=R{y^^{j8bstgkbT4jXbAbL;h$WV8UnHK8qtda=|l}czHv$Hqk^0c?=rc z6ri?x6Ua6>&+ZXVe|u6JpLMEvl$LjY|MHLiDTsBWPfu$e-YaCyj)=gdrc2x+@mo0D znc@0-A>__dER+*mtqg8weWgjDN*X{?1bGrQE>63J;ZKMRqCD5%L|uOW?YcAcc8@~R z@M{TBN#J}Mdl%AXyL1j`{pYBV1Io$0^pl>|>7ZSv6^tPfD$f^H#`H7E?WtU>yX*jFU!Th@((+wX;{5EKv4;~t2(dnO* zX1d=q*B+>irN6r|{J~&&0-brg!7>^aSvHAZRC6-vdYF^=5me+Q76Iu;)_F3RU4{(_ zR4%Wo$sx9wk#4szO; zKvbDSX}S>N&iI9UHaWCYh6X~CLSW*2A+E(<#YDU&5U!Yds0P=v%Qh8CbyqntDTRei zK9zI2J*Rw1&Z#aO`Tn#8+#GqBvSKpUt0w+~Ha#kV(F}QdT%c8<21Ti(uV;}PWC4X*(n||ob=*4B#D7g z)*?}DrG#zyPiR=zfuU$Re=gJPOk3jCGrdJehN}GHQRz@E=bMQn2g^ClnuJMir#$)m ze)&bXE>!jWP0(q1?;uUl*Xt>W%1L8^xp`@}M12j7uHFC$Ny%yI7zz1wv2&OmwbcnmG`02aKw98dZKygVJQFLQ0Nura=SQcmV2 z-~ief1bx)kSHxAVBWgIl)Xecuy7G_ zkJ=mzfnSPj1|b1lA%==Ta#j$mw58K_Ku6BlG6^&=%HvOBt;xR7;?}s*DKei#tISeS zqD5|Zb~pUfehwzXEz4Shl#eAY=%Cr-whoW2hUaByIh3uhp`groD96*8ubK`4m|aUl zfOw~_miCBf6t7v0DGgxI8Zao6wnu?Y4R+SSScI9 zSvabMhmK#w?grM6qHD+Q3!VwgE%;bPfUYv$`e5K2Vf9atT2oD3ig}dwFIK3B^33FR zePScg9lgVDIxWE!!{@1yoFl=@XHeBC`9PF3Fcz~;QEDk9E*Oq6$%Qu=`Jz(Yh0BPM zNYrN=o$IwjGF0*3XuFjGgi;3=ZTeCyO;X#y>EvVvceDkqd$5Ys-(Y1e>;72g3^A>@ zc%!5tnaDYgvmOOabISIMiFG(`>vBgyfLg{#<3lpfE(Oy>_>72*smiDIv9I}PeqUKp zWyAbLg<;59kl9AUcKBu4w&iK@0g$sJ^~qd=skf=z1(2{P$KYI6vXd@tkf;7*Oz2K{ zeYuHNT%$G%*XmwnX$13(v2{JecrUV)?_9%QxtilnI#Ghq!mayY07Nj!6*F!f3N7dXB>V}jw_6jRYR3Rx+$t?LE8;JEBjwVf zQm|D)7vHM%RfdRVG6=}2DWXLARn`j^hSdxS9*iR+#6>SEgUiTA0b73PdUCLylu4x_ z2*&|D1eMb2&%fF=;yMu6#tJ9u-KhWY0h=|W{d2%@S^hytY)Sje0&o`vmAXYueGd-W zO*2Y;Hs015<3d$;7}-kR7e)riU{~`YZ7k`Oq|=Rxnn=O_0kf5ngKtj+vQ}r{b9^&n zYhLdX>r2C9yMrc!r zKufPk8p8{QrcF{d$TBkP=oHB9tA4Hx9^35RgkM_hsmnJ5%SV+J36Tl48ym&=QvJ&Q znSj#tmAzn?ZAf7tFrXKwdYRBx zgW7q>7|`bNFQ}9eu$t>0hcxZ%i@vT(6=Q;Ih4!?Ae}Wo--?Z^J!cW)FnP7{Y4Az#t z(dG0VEYCH%EOPDlg(=FXZ^92(S6+nunhtvuoVco@_6_s?9Wz)@8> z)dSsKz|0V}aD|=1B;*!}pC^LNVRK2>xM>I*herzpq758(8Clin(ZI!@QJcg3Uz;W^ z?hPLrsRBA%$aI&JN4{7{&9#sgS?ke1ak*qmuxDci#98KiSoliow(?u}f*+-OVK1XG z(JT|y7Qc9#r(~lx>i4JExC4=VKhQfsml2UCBcjStyt~7+b79+CaXYPpV2yfArC{6u zAl}&EYBs8OCQLa|b&5LP;>kqjyMNxO3RWuE=2BRN2HB{4cah^l%b*5=g6~U zCLP;pi>=ZhoL>L4I(mYKs&t5AP1c3Epk|njKUc~*y79@@D=l-RT7I+phEze-o{e~2 z_7>Ed_Y1m_DBaBvqfXoUU$f(0j>(Jk+XLjVexWTUY9$V8);vP(tc~XI<+KrgV<0-F zY#x_nizr$sNmJEt2J-*SWy%r{Ohm6Cf9s-U7b(;O!Aq-!C_Gm$ZBt;Cka+5sOxFjl z76EL1U{$AG(PVUE&N_W}#z|I4C)F)eJWao#gvG|IMey?}44{e}r^k z!Sm!vS$yh<23+jIf%5p5x9)xuQ}Fd4ts?G`)Wa&1BY1`d|JLQ#6?uPf7%4@VP^Pl@cJUAG5fA!|1 zEI4md!(s~a+~~!UB2-SgO1FI(%Gl)^#B54yBWGI=nn0}z0HTQ|Q|pDgUWOR%Rr{4j(5MU5D|-<_XiP_!&OaB4a4cK`e(*d~On?92228in)>YavnL zSHlcxG#t7?8L@OpAn-}!Q4L8b|8HWOU~`_Cp}?Jhv>mcqFtR-}(P3C>xZp9_ZK7m5 z&Ek0}U>+ih1brZOJc>26uTK5OfEnq|b=)MRN_2-)+Cd!p8hBZ(Q-KJUgI}(GNz3>7 z+kf6{Y@}sgwaCW!+g};#)icvSk71aEJybO%mAnq!K}<=BMeEB-nLRR@82m1F!Qm(I ze!>Ds1c`QSoe1cD3x3$^-^IEu{g?Sd6%B*i>Oy)!IJ4(0biGA4deuaH1P{&FtZ#H` z*QCfdl^u^e(2Zu#;lsux<~;6&>>_N}%>))$G5EcC{UzruI+3+ou1u@IUnQ?EGnQYh zNg3T4E;X=UWX;cHiIiC=W~Vt=dpTV72mQIbsx;_~jyh9HWYmv$JRR#>)kuZntm56Xv<)FzZB)kMt%t5ro9v9A?|Na#=gN7j*&jqK42s|W zi~6zv{&LOiz=Qmeal8Sn3ant3|dfF|M!=pHw<_Oo#0wYMb-MTS#MHA|i zfIIXUm6D8lVK#!_KvU8w6)@C}A|m>mSQpM_Ka*53Bb-Ca8m<;}StSAMDXg_IqB` z0(QwcV2vifj|MrYs$N9O6@QM?E&=@{=R2v+Bu$ljP0T2q5^CYD@1_H803ESlO9cW{ zTOLN0)$yqX7G>YwcH`@-+9NlPKZ*de+mw4hz zHeB#f+o&cUcSV+ES#({cMh`9Hh7<(c4kDlCD<)?lau1%WX)=}dMpm2Ul&g!XP-OGe zVp$y20+i&3IKv$=jMRVtpGQNhHpTm04et!m6N*Ks)h)_@CJ#&a`h6+N+t3NC8>P0& zmf3f)8)6~a-x!c)kMqk!lWDE})W>TdjXw0hwre|v5x;@odF$3_k`osQ}=Ob0Vx zC&2_9&j9!5#9#idm4T?0)1ZU-R2U=42#gKK4 zI$cW#WZ*BGE);EVZdDU@+YLUvYMUYL+>jrW?kQufP$61{c<1CPdry$Hgf4bXyAS`) zi;9I&^mtWhzt?XHJ9D#V6pS?u_e~4L`kU+Y>z+xn3l<=}%LL38mrCy_=l31q=-_#i znhEbLh7&Qv!j0y;IA+9KRSgVnvMJL9+kmOr>mAgI;Ar;gp_%7Wy;3KileEH$ZjBoH zD?*)pRJ3lC{7Z21iKs&6EW1pzbWzH#zebX|wIMpEF5URdPB)gRS>Ulg2e`borr2V$ zyBodCNV8RWT%R!`lWZLpWkM^+O`F{X=?QgizIG>sTQrJ$i0%L=Mz4f+y#6!OLL+BD zDC_LnTLu?Id=nLA|Fjw4)WTh2-FqPcG4F%4Kt+M~4G@$i_%v1czDsQ5Hy~_mrq@QB z`+;8O24#jK4RskpOq!OA-!}pF*OmuAe`y%iKI7OeIM}%1%Y9YMvn~$@O?^Kd!bsYm zVJF&yy_SdmUAx6Wb*YMqUpFAt9(9|4VDoVS2L1{2RLV!foVBGg z2lnO2<<$@y6MHi(`^)WCA06YS@`xxv4E;Jxo;8>$i%t%Law~ONQc9JD7XL z6IFT78+iuXb1P{H$D5*71zZ2c-U|}(vo0W(D5RJ#`E_OUT=}bnV_*2Kkz+CSs;3On z?OthDK%?LtjaD80srvkFy*2N&LDevPyg+0)f2lt6iTy-+W`(FbXcsmd`@HS>4HmCi zUw%)FIDKEMsax=Tka@ULEha8q>EjGK689H7nWZ6~=`aMDM>)|{{eXW~DFy-cfbF6C zLBFJHrB@0@0_}VHnkN>96EafA7w+0%{Xk4E&OOK`1Mgj8?kGDVOo?sebjh)6;!@;= zMJ*}ClGCxH#ZQ31gV(W+Aot7iBDu>fS;pGL*#Z0m*(estBTt_*+NsK-jh z=w|oOzs`|Em^NRS$P0pP*N1z7yrPD}M@i|c%xOjL%ohO?5O#!*pF6#13a?h2akK&G zZ}%?wm2Ho&ryBSpP+?KUSbbb*j*Cx1bhTLNFC5$`X+ze`nam$VANsa49Y`&oAZ|{+7yR<5(p6_p;NP+a=_3K%v5~r zHLE$+8BY{PnniolQkD#9WWLiKpu-cBgXACyF?vv-dz#aev8$hVU;5=S~@WK-7 z51*RD;>v?a%PYnFhWTkpA|{b=dg0e$wID`ZZl*&p&^sUM407Bwo0gHBEX%_TO{Yjb z+%fk8-3R{i0#+V6HLN zxN^g=EWxS^Wf}A=Pm=exQX?Z0!bPj=nM{3L`k;66OL9~F-uSSrV0niC`*G*PiQ5z( z`!ow=bGIn1`ziW@s>~^B^@$bSm8)fuv;NLIZ@vBFyQ`u^;8tvsG8N;hN6)QpC0w*D z*n7b|QBsv8S*!pou>L5<6l32VLcrMEFbKdG=RMcIq;Pdr#x){M*+f-9Q@Q7GM4~&@ zhB6mE{NnPjJ?(fB6fvo!;WB>wAf~Dt7Aj0oG9Okmf>TQ={Z)C%|IJ#3O_8AN&;Kk) zx%b$ymiM4k5lO<6V z_B>YgbF6|B+_K^tow66|UGJt_%gc?oA%KF)>&^K49iM7Bh zPd2X6LJMs_t4|N`SkW{nOVFM0%)45>DN#52wOO2=t^0Zt7tl0zCoEvmfA{A@Im!`- zj=k2;G0U=6E}n*CKaC$Zf#7f&U?E(@!cIN92UPuT@Ze0-cxL+U- zV?wI1OUWh}74*hQLqD>i!cSGv7VAeB&)WEM0qXmF@(W0eN1iy5E(zPbC986<3W?IZ zti+O)Za*sV{dShaBns2U3!~wkXu5DtpRWVKShvo=(# zeAa$A!SCbK&;Xa|JotKD@Y4Rp$81t|X-c{^szsi63y5rw3oKLX_#^wqB z4^bm2%navr?wg2>Ke;<&vc$e7h)VV><nS2$86-? zumjQmOf)G&z6Z^3|6CHe6g>3C=ba)8U7dClCBFKS#&SK}Hxi%tuz3h9NYssRm8?T> z-UqU&QQLbVgHYSbv=-uletXW4$5ox{NJP%XO$!vgq7CS#7d3SnZc47`yW$CF;zf&` zh2JL`q&K$~Ld6~`k=ZCuYiYNI`%7>0k=O)J(Vs=`fxJ*pIfW3ll>A^-R~m8MjzjA_ z095EB$u8?3>2D?e!*;25rI&P-P~-YD_?V^o#e1yyGkT&1#czbmY`Y_+9WIU*>?RPSqumIJ`s$8{t{o31rO$B z92652Kbr`(k;ZA`m-_PIz`}7%a+^AC20xd;8=_l#d>a1CcPILkwLErQ#usNsD|zX_ zseEho>LzNp?rypG()*-P%hiiuZsAi2wJwndP!FjfLx^0DSn8-a)Eh# zrxHolu+G}G*3gA;!f>c7xz+lcF#K7mjOM7D;Ym(tHa7X0B<>@`fO>&>h&7{6($Bx% z2NhSWBE`4Gxs*?ee8M}?`Z&}Z$d-QLx2XRk|5l==fN+9ebv{M>*{Z-F>#Axx_-H4! zdb=6?`l|7zd_bUs5vr3$_{F785qO&}qt9}rEr?-y86!EnkMcx&W#f=9$*mMGY*S}7 z(d_Cfq!ijA^6#I+iz6ynRZIk+qaNPj5=c~KB{V7xy8$Ri>KId(VUzr2kdd(6%+07v zLhyVsk`N`iLW$^?2^%r1NbqwuU?lEzLuByI$y|mHvjlNf;byUMrcJJ@uen4g3FG%! zLg}>X4-)(tQBhs-)BMj-g8MJ@hZFsYKMu@E#+Q2~n*JLV=0&@l=rPC}%u9KLUHNs# z3O6b3&AuEF3%`hBE%dBp2O0t_k4dpHXXauQ9nOB@w5IM;JS0k1fk+T{I);bmFAR5H z4y|pb*$E|WI2}uU3)m12ua(LYA8T#$+3L}jnn)7)lUorPq3@U-fVVq#UctbWSUE)T zreRSO)uIgP1k++9X+?P|BAh{vu_Lm30|r_HODz~3(5a^0U7#e0s$YazYM|goWrAc% z1ha`d6_?oo7b{7Nu$TMR^Sh*fRz@%Qe0*u$#pVxyFKv_uI+2?~4|?=R(W(=SAi|H| zpB2%Q?0Qu}ztR_;+ij_w`pYibphNg`<0Nebv=D52`h%|6`>TbdtO`ylK+E_{gOh>f zOQR>cQD2Tz;~(NKydY5^Q_UOQga<(@OQzjlE`s z2CdZQ-08Hh8_k~rramgnbP({jHg&)%>)(BBUp{eLR5bO%MDUDYUp#|C}e#{$c!+pmt#}a}O8?jzxlggJ6 z3kBBLY{@}EL@u<&sgGMpt0l8OzNC1e#;(+MlATFN^$W;UJd(iYY|gfteo!7ZVU1GV^&uCC~q)+eFN0 z)ZIo;S#kt92?9~04j1o#mO{9a(tl+Yk9pnrC@-C?-ktv?I+`umvQAoM>sOtrd-Z{4f~l_To!6~Ap=PL!2)@`itIlFdBzLlDH+N;2LU zOs?MRfIv(y3n{<_1n&0_zSHunJ44}#pQ?o75P?FSzev9Do?sy6w^^Y$=BJfXIB?$& zr-psyUCjs_ktL2&W$_#A7sA>{ZEfbNg~C$mx{HDi{S{&tX=N!Q1rm*xxzr<>H49#F z$TMNlJ1yj6Yn+3{&LN*aJvZ%_Q`bWj*_T|`-p8tiD(Ww0UG{fdlxTAkC85cYv0y3IiA6&=@%;?Z&f%WNCX#niwSeg~2j!xK4kcbNXA{`KXsc90tID|MHLTy!FmockdM+ z))be-syQpkrXB`S;K(TUHm5$)`<%qULQ;y$25D)9T4OaA=mxgxO}YVL!at{NZAen3 z3rW96O$16&RtF1L^%JDcr@0oYW4{{Bo%Ap@;!)?H_l%af%77LFNWasQgzcrG$&F541#H|C-RkfC zf#eQJ_cku4R#RbWsx=5$mqARaUEJ=dqyms+Dn5Pupt$p?PZXswHtj`%osWsB*8^iR z-(6ka3`r#{>@Dc>Wc0Chx$Pz)(E*xvf*N~RKz%rko@ftN*AKJ3B8gN26^4R_rad$z z=`o@tkWSuHl_a^1{;`Q%GL4^i`v~0eQLL+?1M1YEM~RXwqa_V-Wva@)%JB>7WRHP( zt?~*Au7(IlKT-aJ-Fz$)|Ly%XHK6Z;qN6%3fvTW=;C4OR&Cu%BAkYzfhk(G6BG~Z022W1ePy8F~jRS>-d^YO9@r-&vbEknkZ_8@D zIYL=o+~ThXfKy2u2U@Qq*EDPRvQ;`P<`ljz2#Y8pIaegh?rnZ0<%eKGxmL@*u>(k7 zx}fP2ev*RG=h6tA*+5NHgm5By%AZ2h-b##AN_Me$6p_TiI0Ww3$9lzoOB$lovp%qBAn%ukrgR^&d&A0$3E0G7??tb9aeNi zxo9sKuV@zJ_knBSE~SHGzYLk6I5kBgoWJrrW20>v$TL>d{V9*;^_nA*SGM8^XMrrB zL`nX7EJxX^7ij$p&^J~x2`i9)uSK(G)}T*t=a?HJ@RX1S6@Yn|m?&&IcKwl7Qo^et zOH|q{PNzv=;kHk6>l_f)Kzi}A+%>*M5?ED6m zF^}3lQ#a!lWg-Y*TT0zeD(xwp*h@}Q!-0c{AttR9|KQUVB*6E=-~P>!xl{_tO3FR< zkV`2*$WNT!rtHx~lOE}3{J(n9Fy+Fiz=vY8nO_(d2M7YL$R2>gc(Pc4x3*%nI zG;rfm&9j8dwTW$P#7ZA>lvC0PMk*8G4BdoQL$g1VtL4B0B=BCca7EGnUfb9?G>S9;P;K z7cMc3Kcy45T?NBa2)$4%sB0jqSqliquYdHQxw0ch%_?@2xi=+%0Y|pVJ-U_@w{kqy z49K2IMyE+Lv+!IO%Sp7Gp$l58Ze&Pqw0|u*d<_tie}guhzq6l~t*|wOEBNZF{<^1Y zjk5!g%L_%vQf1?vciwvIt-FDo01!>xnxBBCJ{mpjd$H#q1G8i^Av@CTr9#r9{sTYJ ze=*ZZ2vp|GciYbW8}0hcW!7e=;WDjdrov*JFjDd=)O} zQ}4ERtlP=>J8E=9i(Kg!1llC`^)XTy(GhV&%C56)i;ZT01eKL4>&t zXPWVEIFU|hw1|;i0{4DH8MYq2aXTI59{SP@yBoPD#L$Kt&@_6j*nV3OznW5DJ_9Kl z1^W-BN?xMNK&3N8ex3j!I` zvys`20O)a1Ps^z(KCP?&{YS_)Aw^Oe?t*EO4LEBUG4Eb^6f9y&nF#sK)%DQ#PJzAA z2~cA>P2B}|Kk$U9PRk0tD{0C25M1>&Sxl`VnJWtG4(Z$s|15_?t#dP}kpkxB&a=+i zM8PAx6rb3)-+dP_j9HUCR-CpJja-9{R%j^kHQD>|5)9448SV=--Ra=rh#EWs?$ddqas8peR9gA3^yPw>A92#=q z_C)lcgq!OB$uEm(D$gt-i=*wOyHrTAKR~e01L%vQO|TbzE{#I|%FFe@+LqnFXwUSx zF-HYEx=H1eMrb;`Rh4fm1oR)>;Q))37I9lRr=vTts#=oeF z2-&{VybUGa!E}8yZ=6WEkg0MipYFFv2kfw#r>O2lMDMuvi|PD7h&dZiTjfWJ#st(B zC^h7_9P=t2X!t*MR*8~+-)%)e0L~J)ymi@vT)^DWXI>oDh+>_3JkY>gMUXm9UB-Y+ z#Yx~dr9!Iqj+c^}2ATZ7_H#SYJ`gA?PM>?lGrzWd;D(I4Pd_($s4W=vfA&`K|3Khv zUHTyVzc_yvz|_x|DUhF(#Y4^~sqg_H+gtD4T?J1m;p2^#sRAUKfVa_`7gPGMe29PV z>Z2XtX_?2RB^XJK*OAh5!2-%JIU+H>n3DI8VrfXCEQvQzZsXSjlcjP8$a4d-)+#S8 z*je^|(O%g)(lVw^D;ZHz46=*JA;9<72%gA33M7b?lgX+iRwOX0;FpsC&BoSfLrCjH zh_}@wSR~dfY}rv~n&v_1w9@vkHdGxf^#}>83hI|6fi4U+e~8`*sD@)TjUTm ztgh%pto_}I;wZwa+8X;Rn2y&_em?`PYYf1e{djo4`r^>9cD)bny#=A&Yoy<%^AmtY9f{vF`x7M0iv` z3=KrYe-t{KK9n$m+}DB}KAe9wN=|`u1PMh57K;29(%CqeV0vrX%StnAR{FXv0AWC$ zzZ7g*rY2Lb2W9%S&@bO~FUSXys=X(jOE;iMT2Rtsj|RW6)XJfWgCb1x518IiD(lBU(_e~_`LLOoH=!B=!1~9tc zWR3Mnm}>+YHWi^nu1cB>sRVsZ_`JJ9W*Brp!$YE|Diaaf1a-7*+gK#|7C8n@#Rajs zazT+*JU^Hxx1HqY6Kz<;0U^cWU2xBJnxY-BcqK`@pQ$NLb!$BnJ53_?W)+xz>gmUo zShf@xjHpBc7&B=^td}E%`HSEOtNzXG?%nP@{(S&}cmgYzB57Kl9BX+}7t6ff5g)yH*Oa&xELr~1nM5|0JtiT_0WWPMnY9h4ie4s)SRC1bM- zP*-&p6oX5hX%slxp;Yl_c2;HBv0Ia4JW<;uF=FMjO>`k;@rD7)V9OTSav)^+Ur>gvghQLp(}Si&TjmK2R^(j^o?-yR z2s{aH>dQ>FX!ir2OHK4wuc!x}U4p!rNt4f|0WgNwlxVW3n2=w@Pl^HU&Jz+{NC^{1 zrF|&9(TDrl+jli`jdmZzz#s)cl9?v)c#8zqcpED%EqrZR^-_G8{Stt>tQd1iri3hX znP95|(STzqM~!U+y{67&(O=ShvBfelx81VHvo3Q_%GsSggl3B5i&4Be7tGr>?uApX zIa<^72*=P0rv(T%b8eMM!wE3LnHT3ylTC|Gv>oCO6q;fXaAZsiCuJ5ieUY#V<0+QG zH2q<}i#3>h>sV7^Wi#mU2CCVZFs~?Qwdu8+-aGQ9u0?2WsV3oEK2GXz$CFoRWk41D zUk}Jnr#bAge*(#p3pPbP}<~Ku>ZK!Jzs+{41b%oX? z68XreQ^d7PVAdx5Jcs~NXbM%QuE+oJ6DOfEZtKh&>ZaL6jzT{24f4EyW(X^Hve)3g zsB$V2lDS}(@aF@yAwx3f+^!%D6M>o8=+2Gog{F9H{Y^p{jT9c0mYFjey z=V+LHS`Ka%B6=WC4$)|eQzxPkNCPlgaHICPWC|P1I%nZP7|y~ZQnfqzvZ0P_$i3eP zV_<7)DJ3O|6`+G2q&A8k=o63)ESx2fa*UHBO=n}Pw^Z`n8bf!l{Ymv-k~Ri1XNK)j z!Y)SUL8dqgr&*t9BnttTGj`KppKNNa!IG$r{-i@U@euHr1!_kSzsvfq7R0fbE$c=J zKROvRx_E$SIiKC>@sfwU((Z{2>zpa+8j)4n{OIQjp)Q(m02w816h(#a#laf4nj%6Z zMTte0Xs`y)W?C;Lm`zHQSkokU?8^P4I-oRtBHkR2+W-C2&>PCq<1ig7bG8=A?^pwRx)CpUP`#?0(bTgoM=M$C_pyC)tDe*rvkQ};V(GEEb zbx;_kPcf^DN%9JUOkSuc| ztCA>b#+d`)9?_t9*3(X!!m{@Ky>l6GI4L)z)iAF(%1qvsx-??CloCyx5qg6jKlZs( zCH-8om81d?k)EiiMCi9_HR4`Cp_TVK%#)2BXm25#F@MV}8?e$wzR_TxCn>;?CUtup zN+!xIYO_!)S*0?~+qxP1@Dgb>ehalKwoNgcVS?~PH`z`GmHanPoL(ITYGppV<^N}^LKv_BwSuE9v1d6_{1c%B`)()P2 zxHP1++q&VT45h>4L~kZ6kBh$3_Jl`>Vi zYYsbCg!2s6OQ{eTQLAzt!JiO5^GiDlli*a1f+dwy%akt^Jh0!^AAI((_zlpA#mBTy zVjps@%7g9bljVW3K2mV_?5G(PDy(D6~Y4 zB%4&23bILBt!O?hwq@BHMItk+kj<>jVm^w1R@% zzH`pKH?s=p22r?Zv=*Wog{ne6Zk~G{-{VM2GU%~*?NM(FQI}G7q*$LzBbo?exQUuz z(R`NDjauYJz9ccdF$`(S#uCIfqWbwjK6w~}?PVh^cePqP%ji0wJp8kk4F!=>=qIk1 z$!^$6ADezZ5+6N%(ZtS6S#}gyEr7cs{LR=5VK(#UnUNuS3$7d~yIF(fAq|m9L|WK} z5i~|qDilahmiOFhdL74S$>cmY;y)x3p3`kaXAz3xq8hwgF$j{vD{vqCu&md{dE& z0J=y0M1*jM@&JSwJpnZ>E%xTBj5-8LmGXm6@fUC9t4E8Ux8H!^@=xVims9}$u{PQk zPXQuLl3jSx-s4$%AJn;xZXhEK7a|HuSzrF=O0#5MdEu{3Z<>iP_#Tj21__8wTX*c? zs@ZBg)@q}-^t*>be|4%6iv7m{XnjE~ultc{3X<&2K`!K zh7O2!-s#{S-RU5D@1cUh>!@onX%a45>}ckGnS%{rT*FwhKi0>TFEOH_+ciAcTf|^| zk6~Mn(mU_P*P0r~N#bhM9LHk)-?`7#TME<&cLYg^oNpKwo< z+~aYRlO9J^w}Uvlc^wPGGHt0dH%L<@UDT9AIWfMrWa1Jj{V46o!Sdn6xW^jI4*^($ z{6m4RT0d{;EPN^iTq3@QSC;zQO)z&}Kw2g%3mDqN9^ zVYK2Zi5l@i@(Y)COH7g0gd`wk^Sm4*=vG@#A;kyMansnv8C3>wf~e3M<0~l7&a1{ir15w zdf0R)8d;OMQka`Z@*ByP(H`>612^#$$aohe!JXyXJ;1^q#unQ1K;X9uVVQK9eD)X1 zd^a9oL!A->*Tg#4lfgwq{f;4jg7FRg$muvQV21?}=u-{LO$_LuI|H&a(G|_CQPz9t z*Q3Sfv(A!D=~t_&lMi_r55?EmS9lP38Q_RSsK|FtU=K|gPb~uFp)K_)&szq>1S|HTfj*R z*`BMNj z_F|+)d71~ahZ{-u+J4vV3;GDRe-E;mB<4t+N?1{-2{4?no*%A5y7JX8&B>gQP)}^+ zfSQw~#eh~oRzinjiRu=MyUC}K(=k#=KGO7Dj5SzOM#sB6-~mCaC}I&wRhY04q%54Qf^>1m9nwAB@8c;tPTY$nHED*~-zuQ8%$h}gLl`W4%dULUh=D^(%m+RsEv z9I2Ig!$ARaGxg|Vpf?fM$sh2Pgf9Lgk%q-mW%?>_W8&(l%NP23{Gb(zak~6tZDyH~ z@R4XTKy=MZT&TN9H4q#c%af`yMkJKnh+6KPB<+hakeD8tt-XG_aUVqSU^Zukp1^BqEu+VL6M zuP*Nrh4jEVE>GqLr>p@xQPuZ-0xJ~XQ*EU|hZ7gd_n5YlQJ2^!gPU3mukFj&K2kgI z{h&V?Mhkpuuf6CY0p@FJD&)&Uq75=D!n7r%yM;)OMAMNx+w!YO!_$9<@w5>FW(knH zmQ~^X^q9#AsZqZGDgyA>3Enfk(Yh^x@~$%E@M9xU_js}^;|g8Us+FgsZ9O=`_^6Vp zd$s9a#J8voP{meqR97t`tdXcxcPyDSZ-_99{*2#?H3v7i1KNU@3nhZTL3Ut{cRG;K zO&Z`2CzadN(66;y!CMpP%4QUJnB2#HH-$ z<7Jnn$Rei#v~-(9BGdE8534@?*;}@VgQ0jC%j*>x4~;d>YxpW0c&_)A1I!kIf2O$W z*3*GzlfXoDsGDTgK+TqM@Pp*QE>SskT!sjJFd3$+j>JSY%4UWl;UKRy6-JWUbTH`o z^kW8S!~+w3(kn&v>_QwKvCUMgnj(&B(U|kEQIE&!s)>~7Q$Fkt+f~ptchk#rpa|3E z=U_Z<+HQN+_7m`cicN|QmP_?^*VAk+Nl!m!Z?Wqwl@txqw1?&qVsGH-t7ppGM|LuUQH>L0exS~+Q=ug14aC|r zaow%j4;MF8db|Au9ftybqIw={2^vuIiJAc>94ypX0#33jhR@IS;ti>hjfL0>&$KUP z&I89!dQlogB;o`uJs7_{ryMmco`|rYieXp-Lf`_A7MH(ch^*MPEW$oEb~96wyM`Z4 zy6A3)aXXVpVMf9TCd@b_?1oJ@7tV~fn(2!ZfIlX$#f=Ln_%2iN9aP8!Td>$b!$Vu$ zPE}Rih)UvmHcRk&FJKs|#3;L1_1;JB#C+sl$1?d!QU6$&HkiZBILW*d39FmbgoXD! zL8ap;)Fn-o_vunUHFW5;A}&)0Sm4L06FAwRqOPmZg*4a%fx<*dujHDvIG7C&uXECz zTE0PSUJRdn`j>eB-={(-5?R_Tn!=x>Z$U(r<1=2iX_jHK}k?0u{F#|>Hh6M2yc(mA0wMh+j*AU{GkM9;3ZTRnV5 z6^(-5$LCQqVawn4YB(xcg#HOEz|gjdR-g(~Fw1~&dtFwIrWvrwJ+0;rwe;t!dg!_F zpd`6pwNMZ^Zeg{Y2bfU>E`v6ojm-x%jG z>Z|(ff2!+}aE*nXCE3c!puWQ`!4~yIkVt1yOC_yS1~46R&ghQ|+qjLwwJASni5rry>8 zY;K0*ez7ZaNj{={3Nd_=7vD&<^k^1UbSH^)CsK`d`-PCcU`H~<{DkFxDAc$nKlHc^ z77#C#5|1CwDkOQx?n)g^^)lI<_Xy@0p;!@{ctV_RycZnf4HJ*B9NEq+p-YMfxCv6` zR;y0c%hfJ1Yp4cg?Fawc2xg#WG^jl|xNB|zp}zgP&?|wUlBoBc#lo`Yxd?dq82paC zomzRmpw(WBq^U1!4mc+jjmjeNgOl>d+b;TgYN$%J9da?>6*0AvRlugHYP)5uDcij`4zP$*3UXi+m&ksL8W~}=;R7XX$Z_%OUp;w(sCM}x$EkZWxm7s^ zIf^L8QRh+bi#SqB*e24bR6`>AV@Hy|?$12=b@W&2Dd0;#Km%qm+s@Qq*J{{x%jO7X7P`0_toN=2=IJdFTThw|F8QOT&})ajgTK$d{EbG zw=Uso^G~I_i_Q9N*|Bj8R%*&78kh$PU0Z!}rYS7xO*F=0;L)XxUlm?#r!4-pFE;9} z-D&KPcZ&t(PUN3%(df1@&88(^o^BZ4%q44-Rix=t6QyViKg3yv*-4}qD*UwNP2HM~ zv6+Ww4ho>)J-?p1^!EtveV;NRqFVZbdM2UqH0vl${FrlsoDF)WPo@TJA=yLHv)a~G zDbcXY*2<@HVNFzo>zISR?W!HNehtjDG@wsR)b+LY?I^x8Q&&4EI$+wqw`{ zpqb~s9?GsXv&sQm7D1(n&QyG@NtSodO^$O~(W^CABr%)6#4Pzsk8Q?4iQ+0QD3H!n z!6S#T(JYi6Ek0#`!oDTaQ4{qssUenBK~Tev+Wnpt16rav+my8ik>!H+%$eeOK>)yI zafyC*`G-u34f7Ndd%IOVp5N}tIXFA|!JW>Iy1n0B8LvMwyKCvJUlVg)zSl%+nf*H_2OE zRz!~?>xznxKO0&wmq!4=Z9{dA!uqs>{lk)X0pl1Z$zP9`|32`#yT^4`mESBEguUww zW@3#P>fud0N^(aF@)dV(h#^5*Y-L8AE^wHk7dZuuC`T8qKBCYX|F%)h2By2%|Jy23 z&31vKg(ydVq-!ln$ZamQt4OwkU1p{Emfa8!!Rk^nRdgygZPoA<>+&$bow#eU;lGwz ze4+>Kp3y)3pFjQH{6qir`#=3RKboI)E$JHWvB4WmrG@X1+udW!FpeozdxE%Ze&$l7 zLoT0E+nRIfaW3!SM(8arcqC0eb)@C`tIQI*pgNUE>&n`4YtZe*+IHQ#+aTKT>?(1C z@Cr0NOguyeM?XEW2^90z4EO`-V&T@JjU~GvJBN9z7~qW9EccphTGu0`uZ&Z!o=_VG zlsZ0U!K@qEt<%~2!vZKB)9D7rX~lJ^-9vX+vhe^^AEUDv=fop*oqqqmp7^Fl}rHZjwi4N!8wo^`4~iOjS; zSwXZFBU+p8U|h8+n2jTs_seK{p{x^5wb>l(#=)$2B{hRW`gDRZF-r`|qKXvv&>d6x zwZgEdxla*{m{b~56uVuKX&k@>*krDVVHzJIr*?J;!U^glz51?t2Tp=>CgyA#bc0Hz zHrs5T+jlv|xJmURZ|)CDJRshZdq1qo46AB zY+}B$eoG@DkLXQQhN$$8}*@m-o;&!9dav1NU{bp;KP zU|Q_W(8nPCvXtA6W33O)GahK{{=759xdw$Ln-1&-;Nru$GnfW&FtqggjD4mIXqP^@ zfA>{4^8;e7Vv7u$Wmebt3|jr1PFWOZ@=r1FGKl_gHvsNLzd;z`0w8lGnfP`3Cnt0V z1$q_7lPtbxHo7AHE~x3^xNN|QCB65kVVczse)e!s&z|e0+hvtcWCJur;L3$MEaTsC z!*=Ei<}Ph8s0WlFe)yd0=$dqN_@%ngE5AUKJjbH!q%17j zoai4eg1T+ij~1UdhPe@F7bZ;nUNz+eSE3ri-_%;ZrMDpZl>|K6As}g2B|qf7?ruph zzN%fg$)@)> zz_f2`d2xV8J<#C!G>iJ^stCqmX@`_QKSNW9GDH(RZh#nL_v}h~^DU5jU@>}m)EIyo zu(Yx{$IUk*Iimx+oQJ~j+pbdjU68`J-)+ab4;JoxWh>Y0C*eaF8&1p= zW-+%&r;w+o9y~(#@zG5*kMLMLd?Mc%3Hyjes&adht34OnlEq>}H z46`ktjWAkSx<%Y^!B-nindPq`1uk{ikc+9S;NE{~TRJ8>GI{rJii(<_-iT;;`;~Ay z{`R*?w#xXD1QoakKCZk5SV*+Ggaui8g0&#?N^{HjDdcieDb3CH^50$fRRz_kj?t&( z%2Ay_rkX*jk0{J8BNQbQ;B|)gRTPNa(-m0itG)#yp;zA;2q7lD6+cu=`DmJpLEwxY z!kWppk-u-S>g6@Bcg>e&3M;=cn`{2UbaeBxHrFp3T||Gd8*r(o?d*6Ur2Y2tBsdg z=TnP7;afpdT3OY29B9?Z{7M{Rv4G5m02}{LAzoAU_jQTgviTZmpKpo9q%lb!nVI&C z^>m1ue;upJ@Jvy^E^CNduD>bVG2pO3E8ge-ip zsFU~_Ypgx&z4|KMz+M(r2&2#e={SNuhg~>sVes?BcB9?qDMo+s_$e!Ah^)j zsx8nib7|Ygf>hHk=EMr46mtW76{eYHo$Y0#l>_EGUd6s?b=>xx_;b4>XSe+F4}`*I zAR$qZUL}XZWP_(Yxlr$EU)3`zeSbj?=i^ybyhPfeQA)%+-SP=$CGU>jeRk&&%UdOa}pjL=EW8pKml<^idB zyH-%W8Z9@)(k+t?Y9oZL$stT8G|4t3tW~sCZTFs-YOrUxE~(+jo+`&ZG0a~G5m-XL zU&dr0NHwzQ8RM|7Ob8S|gocI47T35uoJ~9&^5F-@++FUSc%X!O(O90IbZR>AXbKkq z1W~P%0Qav5n#7-ZBhUlhP=K>BPItl@L~H)Z=q*mKlB6;3Y3zC_`t~mEhh-9(Hi47U z_6UFJ>eGri;7SQ|yHQv9^qNv9CjQ5Pc9L8E)7RmaTPom3&2Pv(2mC}x|BE29VsI7n z+EV7!w<>z5`m#XPwuyM4ug46b~ zW`s|(#WSl0kW{(vewHk-zV*(#?*irMDwB27vi4H=$A)wV=5*EsAnZL#6Tz_pHZISJ zCKI+iTYL3*F1$Cq_0EZ?GI$VBQ-rt+&Gl)n=@)O0+bwkJrWbo5{w#VKS}aCgRX&G|8R;&nm*zP$UO&z&KG9};H1>2H z`|R(MGtE2CKBi1=B)LZw=hYg8Ro$W&x7R}$;lW4N$X z#8Fv$eB7Px{7pNAc__e53hc=%J;cdtuczKYs!`*FXS6>`SWf53wX=Oimr{pI`2K~>kLsH>6^<|n z(doIM63Zdz&)t!m*lQW9-k%Q4CYz?KEhCLCg{Nvw32s@nQ)^XIhLR_7D$V2e`a*(I z9?{SCy;mlB)lotrDsH>dINw~MvT0+Lx++o#(7l8o7{Zd8n+eZqGMo&%da`K2yyq%g z&NPjyIU8aMdsDcku%-2I0owU7RBIuz6GHc6bGHfvl)=N_{RB1G>+`ljWsZ1j0K`Zf6Gz0uy` zc8LSS&=pu=ns!W7f~R28qx(XS)MwA^g_5MU*>Fba zLpc?WHwfo4OaPMRTldtlnS-%HTI6BNX%bwozb%7pp(UHZX&;26&1i|dwmg_+33J=C zmeixr@OjJ@gFnnn(Es^(K4c!kuO=+6QXgk_ATg@2_p-5fJ{`aM?p1YdF5oD`{qv<; zRb+DE9=YeH`(QofJMrn3Y`Wc6P0VgP9r&3w`wR+tVzv2ITAW4Zcob^ zk+yOh+E*w2S^LeL%PBL-a`E`H@*9c*JbnCxQ+Ei&y14jby!PQIpFaDQc}yH?sv27! zIH6>FWF$l+dXKRvcaodoqbiV_hlyWC_a@W*0!4-St^YesG=jF72vwr2(2@gzs_)IS z$4KqIUNP4F!C%TIHUFI+ZqP$P$@(RVnZ?gD^i{EJzNpI1Euddkn^Oq8iCuh$E}W(W zO5(R&C1EJSO8!jfaOVr?Mu|AtI_ruwdE;9@{J}dvd>a&iJ5G+bZbNIwRSjM(8%!dc zp;&rz&nivpz!cEfahRq(iJFmzK zqBn%0bvBaHBEpkPAv&2?)U><6(|Mk;)6;>QB|Y&;<5OlK>@WZtVLm&JK&dKVLo0*R zjUD@%m){Phkzm7bN;0ej_8yEm(2CbNTjtWFq>|6+^%h|sM*ZWNsI)?+T-r7L`|GE)oWEgdkcz=mXp5*R(B zdMf`VPuS6`n#b@ZJaI9uVMdjYWkno$)&~UyO3zH(M9Q_|+e)wL5r9N00`IooahFAs zTcX71VZRh)amA+M_;}JF zHq>mAxZ z?nuxfku#4TJ)Fn*=^?V8A`9!bg9gIk*#lbGuG|Jx2_sG~(UnC$C9x}8x?m9V29+-z zWcMah4pXq55wP|IyR0`aN^!^cy;k^%_Alfj66hzXylDAwbY%C(1TVTEVJAolJa!Q9 zH{SOZgPjA!NPY(%pi+Tr?r3OpVpx^CZ+;}Gz(3e_SlU7?!=~>NBpJfpA3x*u3D5L1)Z1162vksn`aoS5LUa_?i+1Ct05(NH@(`WBVUJSDD1=3e&*$efS3 zUdh@Z*%FPiy!Y<$Ili^9NRp+uH{-s~MYXNl%B!@_xcCWxH%3Bu z#FII^+aKU#je{_;m5t2brV7+RRs$z_f~*Y>_+YQiol>k!c~d<|0M#3vr9 zrzPuDJe)4kN2Uzy{UIZp>ZyMRTMm2a3v!kJ32e+yWBvz%QlEKst}T_>ddhU0YIlJA zXXs84$D^O5FvURkpbbKtG;Xteh#Xi|xZ3S9Dpv7m@vJ2ax5wUuUnpyazqjv11v#o8 zIhn@NHbI{m?lHCM0u_{{3?gJC@!E)0l*31QP{_<9k|H;MZVrM=m-nha5l3^t3^j5g zC*}tf1M0+n`=A{Dlb~2`NL8<{V@=e#Fsb+ns;aK0Hu3z)%YVQs#D3pm(AYK6j|y1z z>?h2RV-#0e{%pGAk9GoXpjQG?%Dd7ozQmwPDJ#xEJ zsz`lSu)@y-_6!>`^yP*AELBwix_tl zukzxuL52w7DA{iFcsBjujk0Zz0qShru!%w!XF9=`SJ=vWMqWA5ioc0O)G=EcZFBjD zQSD1M*?F}gxxr*#RA@3xr6q2mq*gO5I=dOV>k0hP8#PExNt%-K4x$fhqw<99<_`!b7>10T`e z{-ed;jnG&?8LliTVakP1^gzXJWch(!%+PA)B(fK&lDxYlMyGo)8_(l1hF!;%awH8e znh`*|#~tR#h@n(Gq4KafL9}i_wvhQfoX7wU(*{jJiyV>B{qn5s&$1?4{L^^au2#vR zd(Y0w#RssQTrIvF-DRojnlqipkP=31ut}1%0l@d}+d8AYScn3H0cXYSFcuN9xHyzv zJi<_(wOg~Lv>dU$QZf0xn+i+ZHW7$a2{MMmU=3?rWie|c4h*7dWeA?Bl+mXej&T|i ziy!bx2K0VVP5CYwCbwU&Qmvh=$BJHmlhiQHp7XbDyG9NEkL~zuJazy0#J%OTZNK{d zr{$0>y`qgO*nI!jjNVd2dZCk9Ojo?07M(P4DXBH0O521^C0o5fi$`i1+P$YC^9)OU z^rDBVwOxjcxvkVBId*8W91S&by9IKzmml)B>$o&ZqUG^DW>{^4Kp@k&%UT`S2|pG9 zmb)!^rRt`a|J^aln~xoEpe<+Ots*QR&QA9!`NvAz(v7AQB$$wKfK5LH#U<92my$>cVa#Ph<_Dm}0dt}F`G4=z z0R8~jK-LYuv`iCVo=hLV>%{Y8)G-qjH0sJuzTW;w;PRt++Q|L{0q0LTNOb#N9D?FIq%BB1zb$zee!~wR1~OsF0#!g1Hu5< zM1k?SuaMq&gM6#eg(pc%FC7WrAm5d$cg>dx6)uET(T?Hu2(BCqp(R0QJkjowguaBS zrCU^|S%h+nPFu`Q@-Z358f|(N1_S6c^PW`$JpwkZ@Bb~)SKEmQySvH}eE845`EQH8<|vS+?CZ?XLGJ# za+oG;Cp}Y2x%ZLLdFlO}%agvX(ic4U;M2yEd7|AqQw&He>BS<<<*_7)#88URdVRF` zAT|<`cDD!cD>v%4>ZJpv>~P`=rxLjR2>D4S ze8=}@o8y-X)5OfiL3J1WbSg7~qIZL*w;R1`Ahxy!a(?jpwbmRqa zzMYNr{?P6(yMbyx!^O7rs*;fYfooScd8b>toUluW&@;B90rgFMo^E@E)wo_Lo^vjZ zS!?v_krbi1wNns=y??Rw?C0GT*4AihDz(hJmghA<z(hq z>^f5FF*mV0mU*5%H_1D zAc0xh%SvjccZlV*JHz&(Y=Qww^Z)*NEW9S4yNO$o<59Uc>;GE0u0t5w$JHX?s90|* z)3=37d@3F23Sf}xkTvXA_=95BkPtoGoZzL4@oA<*H1nMimW|*D=+9t?{mcU_YcqSO z&B<--JcZ{*Q;9fyP4f0EZ?|Wy%LDgr>6PF83gOkQEG{-|QKrs#tV7nokUScNnst4N{+`^;AXeviT2@f3e z3*$B?@Li3?Cwr)>s?jJ!rb+#Y+s7;6d`Zj{+wCB<)L%5NWPH&_I%P{iV>P|sie<{D zBsfpZ$lDW7AG*RtjDm7ptrv zPF8JO%#wVLxd~Iy=8JpnPrv_Jl4bQ-JK9-YVC>O|{HdN_j7Tpc4u7!3Q&YH!pl-r$ zj-h|yv)*o6X|Kgf6w3dt>uT+B;>9C7(Y`+ssU@*P4Oy}0 z7f_ZJK3%5_QOYxd5e~;TdRA^{IBSdcyqcy~C2}dwmzfi~6mIDE~&JF~h!*-&Rcahe%xw|PTxCOzWQh`^r zs>^f2{6v3?k|jhD*hzAa62!8{)+L;10mzF}?t2f13o-q!(2_1CH%?JiLua#KSMT}Q z58gYm%XaR%b@T_$p!+K2NuZv2;koEK(B6|yx!OMH4r8}&XrCTvJU@wFNVw*=3@S?RF)4pQkk|~_Ox;* zZN{a$3vEX(m^;P_qFIxaY9ZYZPkr1G-&&f8B0-(%i;eC}9ZP{8^gx(c92^$@zE9EI z0(K->gociK#!{RRSSKvsHlflcxsIGt+2~g2M0sU5*@rACQl^^mqcv>MCnLPikLvaP z(a6S(QsjM<)890xXWZ^xxkpwNh}6B>trEhY4Of-B`;BA>urr_%WR?}ou2-CFox2O{ z)-2>>JmPAleZQ`(FJJ89Nx-gh*Lo(OJuz9=bQRE|ai^k2I}~EfHm!?@OCgyjDXO>_ zB~6J}$fre4zmZ}=K=j7ceK`5(OL5jZ7!rPd*z4W4Fqy)cBxfGKc}R^{ z#-FAq(BN$`Wq9U76+!uZEB1$IG6N>zHr1HFMT%=u_TM9E)hQetxrt$}zw?mnJGR`| z&(wuhP&TxdLAX!_r2CZSITLaP^Nky}9&b;Ook*h#0w`B+<a}C?iwtwmW*0pR%k(wq-gA+QnBkbWK01IzPY%Rln`6 zVVztJ6Ap7Nkb8+@O2Tui`a0XRC+lp4eD)i7f~ZlUU`iQLm;JwyC%DVb-?;Porv2)T zT#(vZd*jXvP-gmpr@Chtf~QS88w#3ksx)Va1V3fz2Fym6>h`G{LqlZnru36?gBb?T zW4^OfoZd~GobRM99}tTv>*~YD;v2Rp8-cM;dEghZTb^Xy5MAJFk0boa8(Imu>{O=x zK$h9Xfb&N-3ZA&MGAC(J;?_8sA60L=N zZ0h^nxRr@dm|LVOe3J4tu@uS^j(b2@3O;yAo=*1D#LC-X4>Q}}GQ!PB!^DeE0zm*z zK(N0!7wSn4=i0WMPFESG}SjO~yHb=*O5PW;hb2Hf|9mkBR!7La~P7Vl(jvS38x zhc>({nG>t}%CB*Hq zuL@=Qik}>Yx?UI$6gM>_2Kdr25&oSX`Fhu`yzvENZxo$dB5NBy2httQ)2Y-v)=`=5 z-Ch`5bA2F|@i1;$vVD_X9FFHjV>jluxIZA=>eP9i&Z#JRo6wo9GMToORyv^N; zt;f=wR+-q?5QF3aNC32YfQ|#xC~~u8ezqU3N;TtmDdCU+X$Ahb%ARVd&PC zzM#t?z^lfsP<$WGj`f%sZVm?k*ln7NP}R8S-}^9S?tCxYc`;Y}g)7g8v&DzwP~+M) z?O>wLiIsCcKF{@;`Epy9`B{>6`qn$|zWY~i3*JeBBy7yoB%8eoUmXsP*TF;ETF$BoHfMo{Y3dW zeNz(qU2ij3ldo!WU9HoeW|NsW%G2$`6EevGprQ18D3a!V-J{r)rVSJ+MvC6GD;2~X z9932WatiYZS0_Vc%{?$>wsEDgsPx)li)!+nwn(4T+Mca;91)ni7pVN3BPT2Gn<&Dx zy}w}pWT={Dm;^|-l%7W?o2sZVSEv=*f%o@qvhTAC7WW04R7cBB_YUhCAj**+wf64A#t1GI#zxz!$U2uM zCR($9`u$6;S9RzlUdGu+3k!Xm9U8f#6vqAd92({@o)q-2dl77iUgdkJ*+~_boMvpb zQaQ4L<}%ki@4fQUNVA!XQJ+w8b)!m}xSRCssmm}WiPDk7L{wt#Un3K?S_~Up23SZB zW9#nMxyiZvwzJ{&C}eSpOp*O4ar6yuJMxqGaI*Z*sRqw27WqiU_$W%D-g-o*49S)S z+w5CcN5-Y4^{GyFLD_}uV|Uw=(m87*a+)4EB!H?04K(aAH0XuaaJ3febJ5LgU5@2@ zUleHpQsNGaa*5@zWUz$5XnUU$fDDoYjUrHd@j%k2<=T7yklr4^c{>hz%IxlN<) zluLs=d!g<~HDN4?k%NWcS`Fuufun1pk zEm2_`-nE2Cybc4!au0cMr4kCf-Y@^)&Nof>3s{5<4u)b3u^ER0b8>h1?tN}|g2NLn z+={YmDs|X$tEq&oAGAU-?cYr#cA<-)QJTv&Wi!V`0qiItP`J=bZI5eB?OTZYY8@L(>AQze-JWKv% z`L+6a6+AK(El+41#Rtku-`fF?=DWgq09=mE@ zJgKi<+y$F1hU=8DCl{=B+YO9K&D?V)qAz0VMVDB*&r_^RZL0B%(-oXU#J6TxWcBRd%MckeFg%mCL=SS7XMXj@P z@zyUs`snQ>iAxC+Zst|pXmXwFk=1eTHaeGdVOMbBK9ljH$ejv;GFzOrF4_&Udj7U- zSF5hQaFxyTa)k69F!h<%K<;@tD_7L?PYf^km7+MU!IemELBwuQKCE@AJz9KJdI1i# z33b=?#vte0Uy@H?eR1;4-OBOEBF9(yruF4mv?mg*d~H>ptV(w3>+JGB)eLna7{{yh zONHOEL^GFmT;7s>FD>xc&Olhs_%I#N0iiq8I1C13>dP=Or-EKi>Ib_KEv3crLc=6& zX)wODO_Bg&omg9%KeAe|&~h&DVo|M&?zr0rT&OWe`f8wgxT`FXSlX87ad4U&%Nr}h zy!jMap{!kn9R@Z1FgB7PvLw3$)A$Fpy9nI@en0~s{N5Fwq7j-h0TqzhrtHKM4Qa5n zUKVE;E_W%s73?-!yL+9eEhc+~xn{_b(UXd+bz>bZc2}l)h05-Gw0Nf4+gR;LbQTx9 z%9IBbi;P;KF0gn*`oc%HYOp%1p7l1$>T0#hHu^(5&UUq4tYrOhg%(m-E0t;D-d3KU zRi`Kr1@<&rpLvKK*6%o|f46C0)$qvulm8s*wv(8AuB@&2!cMPds#1>uS7R@kMXfqk zpxL5*fsb~W7&OP4795$wNK5cgt zU#Xa%l^CPv?Ya?<5YiASF`zD1S;x()bN_+COgr&;%y#X_Z}QY0jx_p(#vJ?G#B=uU zvFCY&mv$wsQu5N+it;jjAjI$r^;l~<@{}G$CjT`oR!jkJ-6GJ!>9qskg2y8~pUeO5 zd>=pZ9WZ`SkHI5dE4*pDd!hX8qQ3k$?zR*~bt_Bp`@kGt@CtRP4ZDZ4QR?%oZD;A) z-suPZqCd<-N=iA9m=2^8O zYlrP50|5OcxS9moHg^pzxOych31-HD(Y+zCUi>Ae3(cK$eP?NZ{CzKf;EXzJuzh`y zuuMxK!8g==Z9v8XH%%2_``qoc{%5rYQGA^3jgJ-|H^4Y&ZUa2>Dc|*TexQboIXg*W zp|?|5%$-AJpxkX<#ydHJ(8JuTK_MquBI%?%7JHb`E~LNYe$xI3l6^Z}3GH!SX-Q{P z^Q5T`?{?j3%teM*>4WNY~ni{7JXp2T({GSr_u z8>QE|4(#ZQoV58lnnk>4u^Uu%*f{18jLLV49$KR)jdc@dJef>+dJJ4W5XkMew2cW$ z$L{XcZGdao?tN8&UmEc?+qk+58BoGBOs@|Lb zRcceN)!9822nJ9WMGXJgL?A3tn%50L&ekeQg$Id#OsBjj-42L_TG7)efd$-T+Ykpu zjxRCmY2>5?L(G;7Uc3DE>ru*McZ2f5L{hEGzErz&7gFQ|+^1*UDj`<&gArf(dtE8Y zi@p5zWU}`bB|OFy#N_@^|A1ON)Va9)19mWxy<6n}@1Mts0FOP`09!SOcCY(nS00Wy ziI^x0j%Lfnvj`dP;>RyDcR>0(fY1=VaG*~<`#{w|?Ro5%k+rN`;D+N4^e)|n5%!9!2!KPP!b)-J9~wQ<+g@{{Dh#(8Q1n=Qz8^0T4w6yw#rob*}K#DS*-^#W5JTM4Zp zQP&AoFq2d-0xjK;4R?Fs(pg&L#h#V4#L0W{Zo_gz#hOgy2|ZFP|TjF=kX__b1y%}(kB zpYt6%uq`ITM%AW84TGj$01DtTowb{mlcjI%Kqtwnr!WbAR-Xyp#ZA^^Ym9L-leQ4o zN`0#|oQKMbbre@{0K5cuULhhpT72M3X991lNEhI~obUvhbkfwxB$OZb?eWovK!Z}9q3t5M* zCdH@`Kx%1=$*|~7$5WF>H;5nq#TGxGsL!h;Gwyn{M(oLj?--AMwqPlcrO2TUzPN^?0h>xh^K*Hmi5g++ z=<<&Ph08RDkB0}M4}RcHeoC?0dkeL;^g{XhM6Y6KV>j=`NO8Lv>!I56`U$}$=ymst zGiqSCXI|86x#^?83{B{&v00b4LikiOA|Y>*`Gzzkwr;yOET>18yT#bF{o(>iKuU}| zGR@U!c+S0T-t0@$jp?D|aW7>SGj46fS?`GY<3cHq#%=a1BpXD%*sWj24ZK((U*_}z zW|tYwUqI-6{|oNM=qHuu3|Ls{Y@Q2vtUw>L0X>c}wGz{w=&k0;C2h@KnG4+BPus4z z9yxYoHg{medwHJ4yefB3Pnzc>xr@}Nr8{-RvNY$H@XS8wy32nT$$)C(B6XrWnDPwW zg58wGy`R_Z)7Ve4uc~7(EWaDiXL*-x;44)Vr!Olt5)>Ie2Fr* zu}HRwXHDLD!U6>yz(`hEFl$~~Z++52PE#0x6{V9laTSP04t?5WIOc+cVLIBOkk!mm zvHsDYI%_-X)iE#JT)r5zPc&5@dbIe+w|%5U*ZEtIWRnY1rr{_%$=J@TMYbz*5oe8x zy&?#*si-G{rXhhjn&+ z1N3e;&34q*-aTxdAJ=1E9XaoLVCd-gKLdl4rftyaYx)sg)CxL~s(QvDTMb7_KxvwB zV?8C`I!W}b+xB5&TT%IXR(*0>mF$uFJ(gw&Sz$v_xm?**DdYpNWix2@0uF zSe|YBk?kC|&8k}eRU?*C9baTAWVn-q-3nYKA_Jlh(TR^1Qo^Ds)5I4N5VjqlN@jH1&0!O|LAH0-%)dq$J0RIuC>T_-LTbgYgnT`#WG19PoI-CBZ&ydKG=w{ zK#m;Nm&y-evdR`HQm)f(G{EgLc}^K(j7Zt@Xn4b;C9th8Qrqb^It07GaG3k*_Ab&aK$j0GS?c^MW@Jx za(9Av?Hqmh44yoG@{9XR&E9(KPTZCJ)wprnt4>o|k$dV*M@{sbaP^*u!qJ*KFdXEuUq_V@tN>T=h`k}VX33_rX2*Ae&4)I0pDUQ zCS=zzBaF}q($RAz#A@9rJ_!W1>kYbY zf6}LD9#+lz=ufbnkz3$r$eDAso!C`zZ=4P1lC)VP`UI0(e!|xdu@q&5wUz#Rh)R^( z%QMu^ge#yepVO!v=(%d>1lc0Fy9TvB{1woNFaKBzVP0DH2sLFxO&XUS!62`M${3zn zmv}2+&;3hFp0bunga6wDx`c|HBER&){RY=(5f%fW%0;8Y-O=aAuRi38kTc zTuO)VDV5Fqv{X64JFv{a?J+6M?R~@9<+qpr#x6gtGej0#ur=n4Am8MNPia~tAG#es zcUd_QrKepGGv^i^Oej?ghZVE-vII-Is>^djQ%53DF5Yn{){bfg02erK)YQ8Tf*vd8 zW=1APyg5?vCj*9bgNsbUzy3O<6t~DanHKXt2#PX|^z=~{ftQ5GHKw1(Mo8~9qX1Ei z%~9t4FCP{78_Cv>J3P_BuvjMUC?$~RGdz4hc1ev8=_a{v`Nu?)@Q{+RZKb`#?5=qgtC6Zhy+ExMQRZ~}krg&L@I z7jEwn_^8!8rLjw(zY6@@k@JyDeBxP7>i$T_e#6e`q1frwM%EU1D=yfdQ+sQ7*-yv6$IC zjg$iimonzHU z>mG=sWcIrm<=M0H!s=4-NVOxAp=;NkjvP{e79y0EGn~Ki@#2E@QnCf89=Pv1v#3nBke^0H=1FDDKThRpTUrqGT-u*JgLoeC0 z3__<+osl@_sg%|LjsC(<&SZlk@7B+h{8e*V;tTemX3eB%6X=?Bx*<#9JaRZK*^ zXh1dQuPys?N+@#oCEkk9Mwoo367}(iC7K&Di$>7fsO@4=iGJU5;Z-?kq$L?NOrG#= z_uPzIpIGZnvX9JF^KB%F9z0_s+l!_i%FbgWnwg&dm6_=Ip01g_8S)xIv^pAEGJ;k%P+GTmh)aoEeAW_3+uhtYT00AVp@=@(`Zq&`X z{f-y;%qbMRj2D%9ti6Qucz^cSZrx>RKzeLwp*0(o`ig<|S|YBx+7Ttxdp~YEfpHqC zT%x#K)0cKtTdO*mxDRjIh{egXE^~o zOCwWl!X?{KoW7SEWq^7<_Cm&$POi!e{^eo^KVq~j&H5@(;mxQk;Xm>*;!H5In2r|=B3oFCt>%=&%2K@Am~LL8Sr8O0lN$DlN$SK|Ay5s z+4#P5PDEr?_YB)p72Q2tKoB@p)!mhu5hu>&yI>y2K0OXgReXv7{4j6R7Sh}flsS+# zNdptcnqgV(sBnEmtF;`{@SzF*-pBJxALnI+m@CuG2^R`V*?UL_pIub&@y>J2W@S2P zYd7LC&}&Zwb!U#KP4p1t{H479r%{%l{I`&Qh`9{Jx?!rYzRg)hpZX9fZbK1LgyEv= zEfpAy489b2&seka@Y_Xl0&)Q$H-)iIKbk9sct&1u4(J~&vJnA|bpW?Y&FoKVhX#AN z7^dnvDrjUdlvd;kXi{e5j@&`%kkfZdI_RonmFQndZK6qv|LJX0nw`PaijkzLsOuLO zG$J&y%k8L&tnw=j0y8I`5Yb2^yaYZxhJ$2#Y$T%ax&i;@#Ea0>mct6YP79X)3W)T1JD zLt`YQ#yy|Zh1~7&$i}sjS zfiT)+Yaiel{CK+Zu?_ml%2T`kEq1YV{{HZffBfZt8#-tr^4cczJ#UUF|7AQLD+OAI2Q%-0Sv3-#9OMHL zh=b8|riYX^cyisITiEYOB$yWG(=UD@R&iYHPz*hi>-sCd2wgiI|DyJpXCz9^?<{us zC);aYuacL4EA!1S3V&kwtVR;9 zoD!$kFZ>nNi)J3DOY@&O^1&taH$g&_^St-o`9}`4!=gkdYNV&o9BHJ_G1# z zIhn5KC6L&G%XmVT|08MueFmnZ!PvFkKeNkAxxKVCn|AKya$d*I1MfkOVSm74xFHfz z zKo3DPz3{K#H~H86-v>1c^Dewd%I}=kw$Dl7p9CrT^bDz2n17n2k*!Pr^zOrw;gE8G zMI*|H>?AbKc-*IOFbDc^emk81qkcn08)kp&>lr5$J>`;MG%l}*AZnT}jOpnI5FABB z7g8Nc{2!^;laB*$0ulVP-fgJY$31s%yi!6{gFeK}uqX1cXPPq)hG_kEmX_!j9A(|2 zUwgwQ1eH54i*u=z`Mq8{V)KBOtb|v}rMQGpW7&l`r((qFf~v6oQyZN}#-uTRG^MsW zIpYy0j7Uq^gw z0~U7Jh=~0mR7(2g;`6a~YjD2a%9v|u-+N^l3s)AZj!D!}ph1$Hvp(~wa^+;-dFS1C zo&ffV$0kmqj$#ZY)(YqQ`3h8@g~%8kS_C*=D1MZuO_{Oi^s92L^IaOL{wG$+{~+YI zW^|#r#CYIPa#hn7QCwxduSkfcwBg*DMkyPT@`Sp71DhkrtndN{#3+gy_Q`3Js~LaV zOT5LrK)P=oPlTR~)ri3fu2MuPCt_0!wfA&B4TOE zC&vbiJ)#bXmXUbWYbzu{oq}p*&4(;XpJ6h#f!?8NKiC7$zgpwTcaO#BTnaiNStI3h z&;qWzUNXQuQNxCE!}Q#ZCXvoKt^W}FQ!NI!Cj2JZjB;l!g`3T;rLQWViwT_I0nUf6 zKMxYKDacN{_D87_?zldrJih4xQF-kyt?Pd?|Kyfc6E#7W`}&J{`02jX<>Oplzi7(3 zNd9p}@LSz*3UIY3LpVqsR8`hGV66VSTzv`I)T*y{NSq-c$7QBR0RjG%TfFthU;gT+ zZuH4LY8z923_Yhm{_-E5NT!X}0}H0c8Fl^ss`LKf8yhR`_(jOD*LT~mAC0eCHeW)`5XZCZb>Si z2w2(4%uj%uqV0aQl1h$q{Ut%bk?_kFo9o-n;YNF6R?yo-FjNK{|b9{bvU-hKH-UKfrXV3;Tp?>FEZcY*cLl$-8sT~7W?coUx>SPnja$aQT=gl=U{ zEO8pn9`*S&8ZYXO?t-s>A9heVoTMRm0!57vIBxdm)b;Pc}@o*-O$HsV`IJb|?@eAKq>q{H4CE9_p=?O0Y-6FTm zP=iEVG7-#)TUMkAv#_Q<56U#sW`=l(UkPhcSr=+NNv4L)G6*^Mmt5tNxeKmYXqD>j z{HtkMj~9y{PGfTqo>@QXAWc4YKgaO2TznQC7~SHF3)l5mi*B{}5Rm@!<|@m{1wXCt z-33B?gp_z*dJb+;aNMir>}}zFZMLa9OU4JtZ6iAOe%BAN zNMHB|(EG^i_P+3A>%kpudHmhYy%^Pmy+Oy{%zVhU6fye>+<3o2WGiHg_lY`dK)9q$ zxg$T*I2TFJ5nxT5(kM>BQh~Tnb2kS5ozx|NE}fTSP{KBlYog)35F1SBrp%ORVPIG< zF?2BF)}1)Q$Rv_>@h(gv&56TCYl#(6a1%nH>XuNsaOUclw9}~iV6NYm7l_PBmee>y zlk^Lq8XriLc^|l!V000FwSmfkpd^dZPg?C^#lAINXJ7^>GmTX{mmy61lG-FTUrGv? zEUJt0`kz|;hnWFfT%GszGPP06+fXiV3c~66x`D1rp6Vd4Fa&UntSWeBF9jt6jeiow8Baeq3lq!4V>nA*{*({I@EkaxI>CHG ze$8L08fyeAa`~L!aHCMbvL=N7D~uP;|B5WPCNsx->w2@12-+`2Fsd&WGuoOf!f|r+ zD)$lPy(w_H2!J&DFqP|xys+JB#H zY<98&d?Y@zhQimQw%yrr5)dKgQ$6P-H(^Ng-m0qH4pT!pY?5h@-c+IlJ#<#r?j0ZKP480Y0x^;x{N0m8JWct^qJE8Y8G%u#8Zr*{nz zMD^HRxweo3bcc`0dH&=fo=(v2Rn9WTD`kU~Cnu6fVY^F5$sl5uQDIBfkZpO;O%V!$ zH-t(IFtTNC!Gl!jdysSTpFv5tiuO5~^=U7Xv&b=f+u9B_%T4%C1Wxt-(Uo8_|0BHtnufehuz@kqAyIw&!P|K;o3RvvA z`m#8P{tDNfHTH5U?TWtw?cBFezabPNFeM|Z79S}qnh8S3)mjhy_<1?x>OdOKZfi5V zobk)w7{AiCc~;eAa%e)-)uF+w2-e5G<}WVl_DlbjYWMRzPZ&beY$-S)=XEv%*^$)b zU=`9(pj06;d|9KGNRyS5L0oLZP0TwpE;;jlp8x0#5?{GvI4MmUyLFw@|k&0h|YOe7y z<68c>9Lpb1?&xyJhP5cSexIVV3>J0tT{q=^lZZ!U%1Y|SwkWwk{((QlD(hB3F5pIo z(8^nO^)3ntWZOw8*3H)E&h2~OW(nSR;HMvfdQ+#SK0-V!=4{16Pk0r1ln);f5>|xOg{Mt6n-il{hNtZas29d3*7B zSzRCwllPPB7Tm_eA;_F$?R`^i5rV7c;+u(bYhjTvrgU<2VTMdl<~pWH*JG#>qvkUjZd;r~7^Mnr{a%^IZEXRrmFapvV0j zN?%2nt(ah~1-IlcWZh3rJhA){d7jTwD78ffF$W1W;C>mybAC_E*=7KhFo4Rq$TNYS zULtu@`fr>Xh|T)uGRz8Ea#Nd{{iNbu8hSUXB27GLvB2N2B>=Hl@QHxBjeB|MXJ1!&{MJ;Q@BN~&W!=N zYAvrs7+Uw`W@Bd+qRz$Dwi_?5zZSHtub6i})e!R$@(qTXng}^#N~EpzB#pL#y>bsW z4TgP&;2J_nFlXr9h$%g~wnCp_A|T<}d`IR#aZl^kFVpB`d;J2|T*_Mw?Is`O5@e*JbRJyUBP}RHIrU3LV zwIu?=%Jpx?K5>M|v&{AHH?^DY2Jkq72cO7%zpN%ZUT_Sm-oEbc?$Sm()^*Ckp36Kv z`{k*=>9^xq#-@C(=Xn=l_M<&g>F#_x9%=8ce>=sR3^Fv6*>NImqErPMnoV5^oc*!o z=f^$SJ~ZRjB{d_^BZN>7^=&C0;dZW_{Bi3aD+)7ne7K3v>r3Er>Z2>INQd}Z4VW5r zOcjT^ErxpA3k95sS@Bg{3W;Fr>rMsTwY3R(RX|UR2>-NLb5PVO7t2Y3G1bs^Q8!V1 z^+xG0jyRT8cZEtfap@9M4Sv<=_%mG=$;*AYuIT~f#`voLW4n%%g0~mXZn_hwEYurV zTBfKjgzW48`~|2}im!nvf!Jk0Mt?X+k&BQ-wY4^u{dbxne*08__%b z$w7c0K`}wB3IfUg5R|%S9b-i0^7^0fNX5;zSj;q=xQ$K$qOW3tOp`InvFkAL_2bb(K<&97I zF0n9>9QRC)nLlTtg#YB+BoIf1oAS+=U08mNT6bm)nlpf4cP6UV}LW2|Rgt<;dOt@W}@Y3l(wO5jod(1Sz&Hzjd z^bX0|3+AEazujRgIEqXrMzBaZpO-47qq6cuhKo>~;9dR6+t(X8G;#D!+O7AoD5(46 z7iI1ZyR?|9x~36YbK(#uPKjy_VUKu*=mi*Z4N?}ZB=>Y3{IMdX4^#Alh2ZrIf72(R z7BCm;YPnk6W75k=?*qfV6@5zPk}OpI*&(GZecA3AMHem+-_A?2t$~;WM+**Q!xhQ zBzh-EJME`CL41UEMG-=Fw%g=Ob9MuK(g<$_pKU!f+kw};!n*Y_7p|++_{IF34#IEP zRf_W@LYIuxC(#zkcDf6(A6{lB7oJZqTZ9w`rA<&q#2ofGk@cC+G{%7}6ZEEAvu+S^ zlR_nJqF!9=ZW@qx)pX-{e5A)CIyFC>YiY-fB_?rbf=fRGfi3B{XROW?sqE0stk-Rq zOa4rdH7tGmZr8EaZN%VXhSNwo==XDj?BFRxz*%(BkU(a;Q7OvUC&Eh-F03NUsVx{L zG?b}NT^}-aQThB$HV=pXepzT3r5C#zvU)BzzNHs={5LNlK&Q3qPk_U`_iHom>yC=2 zNXvcLZcAYnO8kt=1Oo+H{atiJ zu&?06Fk7J|AqmaW-aU6?k-Q)?%kl9f4xbndn^?blVGAeF`_vR5h{$D%0@4+4qRQKW zoe1K;da8?NBKr=874XM(N!;!|z#QY(Qkod{L+B-;Z0$#-C?~r=qTK^K#V`mbfy;d` zhyDi}uvwek4%=YXnrQ6})}O4yNB2x#@i_6xdIJOtFO7Z42rnrYi8H7F*Br8HbBqqE z)VO7WnqU}eyJ2zVrpw2(x%a999q%VzwUriz8BaibgNrMlS)Qf2RQBoTyOst?D!K*+ArH<_-67V*R8nP?D-)T+@4i;e7f$--5Ho913*JkHv--hU_6b~G1Zee5 zpF)>DeHI_+pP*zNFnbwDy2P*Gxi)v43@RxtKHA@>!ww{hNX9?2Zn#q4LK2>5;bqcriI`8iP1OaUn>pXP`68Nodx&w6!Gm=ScWFJjUiFaSzCB&4Qu0+hmY1T| zBj<4i4sjoGu|5g&vEI(x(`inik{R2rFV!-%M0Y1pDmH3E z$l4lBP0q%IXS3}4sg9`?nvCH+N(+LlW!{bRLXHm;Si;!+{e3Ocmq>)lFA1JkK8T|S zi?kp12k)n>?74cB4(WF;{EEmgQxzil`Jn7Hlcv-!Z>oDHMkPNnM^?u@9or$PcGTYW zVpid=p@XZQ|G0nv6PTe?l8T2wC8<0MQLJeuITr;~&M44ri3Ax%BMg9}!Jpy-Uy*Qo zztL8%#Nf>4B#QIcKW5DCv-`Y=#!tBsh}|KH6}DOa`LCdLgK4gq8IHB_bQx@b$aG|v z%3vu{O8N2;uH)8Y-e;vR1cCpB_c zw4E~8jMGOmpzDv3^*^E;B4tKGr44qr*l4Z|3?l^7RWn^ay!__wfB4i59DlOci$OHH z8c{7|CZKJqa&g{Iqtr`9sB;X-c;Gs@zk`kTcL#*-YrB`ANJ9xxwqH#=^-6|o-9uDS zz(>OS>1nJL;M!l2sJH^xJ8g2DFGR~5uc_{VhA#MEeD*$V!oS?*MSV`6JD=Y81VFt) zM2B2Q(5uL`d$IFJ6p#Ekp(e3_?s@!B!5`^Mp^k-Dpn@@yH8seq`U~6mePv!$9dyPxoe8_l(!RQ*01olYLqdnI8n$ct{6+UW!xpT-A706$XhV@SE!wn~rH^ zP`hJr#{i>X8YwS`ugQZvY(KAAbiGk0ETIS*x+2dxX^f=^ zXH*r^eOK(>g)haJ2tLFRd8?ADE`EdxE=b5rb8W_^7AviG0r|QOfkYzz|9nzX%0LEt zrY7YL?Is`K&e@#AaJOI1=tOdKA&Izt0hh4;AcM#qX1c*0GOQ^(E)oNfu0ar>p1tfh z0y8&^;<3=m>8Yc`;kiu9fZq8aW`MfKg!r1sESQhA(5i=k^LuRh?(rDVcX0?g0xIPu zwWql(f(kqNQyD0g?8t*avJivGob9V~Vl@{$9P$Xb7g?`wsD}+?XSWx5o}{DM+6uxD zSufK~P11@otAkdAx`*R4!jd+yjW&9Wo<%QJ?T?Uz?80anPAR-XKl3hcyyI?BK(3lgw;BDJpa%_;vVIl56nM z(R9L_sTK)@JPE|#W#nbISj`P2Uu4*lGynyU*KO+d*s>HH-(z1Pm9vIJUk((-!1PPS zYV|#nbOp8a@$8Xj*S{`ONoD*qYcuzxf9!ReCpl0ny^~<=H}_J}3ns;){u?ZI1nam5 zg@u2i;I5?g#)2IltCw-YCz=%YiJh+qk4*5sbF%xFu3Xmb`aAO5+i4>os+(P7A9**t z_vv!>+MlIA(Bi!dxZt$wzxb1P{>1;wS1tXB|9;s{I`6tKH)a3j=lHPyp?dijfAW3& zbX#ux!};0Ie(F~GC4cs_pMB9)-~aA+-}%AM-hJnL-~Il(fBxQkKhXQ4zvdHu5BVj3 zc84WoH+S!Le(&w?@#%eGN>GMOc;^BYj^J%9o<5tG>IU+Df;k^AHe$zg`p<3OjYMb( zDiI@eg61ae<@*~%aGkG8o^nUogYg*{JK6Tz_&oes;Q#m;_bJ79macDWf0p<(KWLSf zeq*0I5~1w*iROU+({SYRXZ^Gen(*R)TTWxwcIbSd%R#0TPoBzzY!#B=KXx_?7befD znsd_0{~Oxl@*oAw9k);%;&2T*;DD8i|L*vfT~(1-4CG}=*%4eb?wK!`Hdo_?6A4_Y z-CPh#z?Gppg+N!gcSFp+K85|F+jR1{Iw(0*FGU9Ai2ASr>Oto+9t3nA{kMaGF$HXg zCfq{2r3?d~m-pxO7=Hwii@F!FszF4){PJ^q3^dAJ1gh8qHNP)NhH15;7Lg(t`WReN zFN+ys$K(k{V1k7r5sgnYVG?Ak-wjy6Y|cSaL))fYQOVYsgZiOQb>7#a02DQ&gIZxf z;X4!w6juQ4WM*#1>)-poXb4L>J&Vks{Rt=#;Z^a!_%)V2&s9}tE=;q&2xLRq0+opF zocZsut<|$>C@ZF)rn?;O-Q!9A)Y&hIn53U%l}1dKLY{_40Iefpc62W8{Yj5~sDSml zecrXo3ql#+ml%D?0Ss3Wv5OwNs?)Iux;0?3YQ9!*=`z-#+Qz)n#sLx_B_;Ev#4z<{ zLFq4{DJu#vKLuaP@7lY1#k~I0*mQN4#teiMoJJ6Tw3Zl+H{C$}f!)+_`<_b=ZYbla z;Uv!)IuNrX7Q?U?Gl$F;QAs-+jFgPHLN;Jp1zZqx4_9gnoY&k-PV$WwvCGWW`@-5H zqnN}YTJJRSQ>D#R)kmKI%0DiA!qD|WJz6D-P2)}I>EnWo1Jg=U`Nbet$aJi&gvngO zzLe;|5}l1*T`ZJt!IPk-s{T-4e_e41p=CeLve>l&2A(j~C0Ly^Uc{uilFzPq7WhpS zvXJMK&%df#hGgYhypSrSRI+`C; zPwNT>X&(~KHJEpgsCA%;BleIuv(wzWmK$X8^!+t%w2q#rxY6loy zc!;7x$&QwP9MdfCAm9!;iAu8$nmi*scc8l%ai&OqB?uq79F^9R7EFU?wPeEZ88yso zHe?3*wfvK=M`rH7bPd!Xd>AqYh-c-@8cN!Z|L4E>U6Ca~y!GyT|Ngxv0lq!=cm2aZ zE@rjP;t&6P;9I=x+7pSm8TCa|Hw-8zZKppL>Y_6Ik{Db)>ttU7OeHKSfimn z6ahxUFShQD;@z!DUfVev)8pBa!=ypTWZahxE^G!w6DnP3#uh zuf}uQiHWF0X;FpIFx4AA5r3{_#$PCH${*3o+MLdrI**SiJbkPjuwwByb#>vI#gDqF zD*d|C$C-04qYQKX2DtiZen92f%-?zEop+xUvWtECsDl7(xqI-iY z9OS-!$urh7>*-yK_2vHqtmD$=EiNi(1Ze(N%}I#T~~}A8JB_jkJ@W(K9V}d%`<%5XvzHX>W3Hn>NALa(k9L-Q@Ugk)QN-Ci=?>4P#AT4ZYGJA-HiM{VuU~vM`GVxU z4@m~wP8i>!6%gk)7HZV=Tl!Uc4k)H9wyX6FoV#;4cI(qrVMwGV2K5?C=6!DmqDQk= zDX5;NQ8Vmu+rL$6EigA25(_zk2BB_%=V@PGXum#8Zn--2MJGwv2JCY-?dc$7 z?Z^c3!K9obRdD|UdRRQ(1X0AA`_8Wk+|0TX+sRGmmrCer+>$m98`6~&Sh}&Dme<4RFW@gpBp6~TL31(Pft?a z`-}Ip-qo4+RnFV$mu6G1f_j|pdg(JoLx4hhG{Yc)S>k%VA~A)Zp~k^Yc6nMaZaNtx zy`R~zd0)fy$O(kqMa^SF)~%}O2Cq-g$r}$RgPoEc!xnqOjwuo{GsZRM@)p_zD7w{~ zm-&BFBqGiJ;117}5Gli7M9P9lJE#Vd&*O)Q=D_tz7~bx(!YE=jFptLx%p{r!i-9l+ z*W<|Jzonh#U%>eJ>#^rKZt5$_r4or#n@yyLh2k(M>67Fcq@2Q!Vs?&J2loEi4#Bp;K%9cTu#)>dM(Un0IX&DjSy4G z^;s+a_0Fz`he7(_Gqle7R}ni;iCT;%g5P9lo&m=aT^N{kop=890mNOnp=DUkLg;c1r+;wc`KAgs24oH|k zU6|XA33Ibp_~Hw?fpQvlQBK_@GELTZ=W(k${V{a~g#H%ysa0^70d9O+kR&1U!}v+_x;;Gs>h@?J`?(s| zQI+2FA{5Ds>f-u0F!~9%@t*Dwl}5`cUBH7BI#)i+*8gsNj!>@cjnLB7+C~S(Iw#h$ z2Xg$)VP*#1vVik);=u(I>_f&u}1N)UZ7ngc$qz&KF#EO z6?Wl%kvxExN6%x$$lM0)Is_-C!u4^AbLy+zN5-%iF8v=r==aVz?xln!6S!Zx0CGI~ z*x;j^@IZh3<*$4u^2cBP!vPA2%~q5vtP&O260s@NQrfw;?u&>eP>O(6WwuD9SF3h5Ps2xa zLSoO6O%SwE2<58fzW3)u6Y*JEB8B(UCF#WWSNbtB8x?T%Eg9fLJl8(>5Pc*`CovN_ zxuVnE%KPJoJsngu)1{C9J`Mr6XRy7O$`QT(r3X9XAlw}~1ZmWZ@-{hcOfs@lxgunWce zN@pBOVN!(&m1!YalDO_Fv|om9ZMX5|FkE~<2C({+@X~%il`rH+_J#TO*>8oZ@vu|~ zHLrtpfoRUn5veLp3@q8(i;s=dL2e*F9yYKU1T&uEkB>s6iy~0(&+Y<_Kh_=r&#A)& z&UK_7@s)H~{rGWbBhc`}ak^_i69%ylF}}Whkcfd{%H>oFnW!c890QZg97Vm|;^VF@ zo8{s^)@@r?-FOdB&%g53qK^xHd*qvFA<_Q<@SP?3TX(V2KGK{?RIkcbRF>M~i{*VF z37czIs9pB7OhPD@6p~tT)hP0j^YPuL6v&pf$mZ>5n_yH~BZEZ71-9`OO^`Z~4S~sxH{`=qCR^ z0u=mK7j~plnuaIV67g|ytR?3HS_;ocS|r*PNfNPw=bSv%rP3rt){Iz1d|SAvFqbnZ zKCix&R!bAGc!4*4`eggwGABt5NP+n`3CR7vSVCI^zgi zM^^{G^W%`9D?RACr5dd&b%XyM4&E7Zs$k~jq!G+M5}1T^w{y%HULhoUqN*-F`x8I- zJASXcD^X_SeW?A8eF8kX3`PQjcF{BkO_Y!;Yhx#X1fiRMR!+_0r*#Fom!!pOI+f&3 zX1>5<)O5zL?_9aepa1(OiY{rK(sr@M6`u5z5Nw$)3sG=t_Zf(qX0xyeRhy|Mh(|=# zQ+UBx8Dv7Or<=_q1-`$uBqz52n_B;av$)>$vpbMP1+?<)^c}-YPli^#l~qRvbU)xf z`>09A2NU|HL$>Y#3#b^?wX0_dG@8F`B6qWcEWF8-gc*VRwRV@B$YU*YabLlvbhk0Bn53MgX@QaDA=_ukj~$S!!$-(F+}F zEBwtNF^SwUalo1NhC@9X(?p~2y}_q(`UEy8T%59jUO_s2{p*x=ZkCIDs*In*){TF{ zFMRn>8`4+zZ?cnAW{sqxLNRDVxd!lB|6LDF$2OxuD{B8c%r^OP88ZB>@a+#dDB|si z+n2J`q~{mdCB`PRf3o)&{;7#cVe|gD^SA~tsSv{kZwl>W3hr-bH;8*Ox=tD6duoz^ z6SQ~7Hbs8`v{R`%-n{FI3M|J*#(dhSIuy%5;Z?0lcyE`D$+8cfs=Y){jUt&M3{^)A z+`-2=U=o(O(WQ|ioUeZL5RC%ylF(8EQ%(V zV3D?Lutm}fx<^h_on&%sUgv~BV}3}bk=KvPcV9e5tO%m|$QW6+Z!Bnq!(dxNGkR2d z1L|9e?TcrL*VVwYY9!McM-1Lmj4|F5WYxA#-V~g%B?EQS`6QQbma-2y~)u%-w6k6GTa(5wCFQA?4!IwO!40wpizL{j0HOV&u`KLu;>AE#*KzGmm* z;Zg8ze)OMEJ;9AdDrTF6CBbanNpbqPGzQ6&85V+sfor4briu9<79)hc)_q!+Dl13C zLZy9-AarG>n^Y7nX5t=3tm76ByHdK&*r|bTbkh6t>X42{gaAGluNHA;snLfT=wGeA zglQyQ^W{}r3hf%gJL|4R@!|MzYseqO?7iD;y1b2{S*&;%>`lPAeY85O=GukY z-vPp98%5j`Y+LG&wQZ*H`uC#(@ceQc49pjq$c4x&PW^aBn|hRlG7B+>*u!{Ob;~dX z(U)$36lj-QfRTf_V9d%(#VPaaUDW4JsM=*!LEc{qb{`=U@Hkjwjn9om{&tF5`q4*j zj)S+w1jO2XMVN1-p^$A4`#V@u=0oGyzKF+M_Je4t!+GMW^m$sTjQK0WpJ zx@=9r1cg)=WB@TM2mao_WVTW?3m<%X_^NSaru{zO=?=nfU8>VCx0;Y~OU+7k@qW^I zy|=qR>o(19e4_p=w>^CKthfF_j*D)g=;ch0^Q!!(SOuLGgdV1V(=oC?)Fas+*+->8 zci`z8>b2PnpC_s$XL%Xy!7$VD{K|8m#g7iAXXq0doLy9OfDA05_*p15NJsDT@7^J! z?dx+WMYvWlW8$AIa>qu|wx06LC?w&AnPy|kEP6lF$f7(~I#lGH4Ohbm5igTd^UlX{}_Wap4W4?~w8GNle?Ltz~IbqqyO^>M3foPh{3Xgd*L2vT|My&Nz@$NGgJ6 z7=6CnVu!g!Y%U67!=JUpF{r|#7~J6)6}d#Q!}{pZam)Tl!?>e=DXFtU_gj_ne3&X* zHnYsMAaMDVj*iGRiC7qSmhLipJMr0lJhA^ne=lq8BW%TgrgHoAB523KGr2FDB8R&EEFG=x(J$WRniVo$^OjVT`ANx2qT6?nJ2bD zOS@dch^rELBit)^2ay9wT$8_j{>C=fFSZw58x)mTB4VU536@YuV?-2uQGfYG_a&7d z7bc*$@yi*HeA{h(a_KkCbBC>Q!F#@{n~k`%LW`Ex2nCy4GKY{Q4`(F7C$)Z0P*jiN zz1A+B#BD;<@0$AjV1w`jA)FgW1vdjM%z8~mB+5X@*&sn$)(RFaLvNm zTEblnZQ_mJz{@hIl&CMrK!ILSvXwxQBsQEphk4XMlQMZXs;^TvU8T51To~QH#{5P0 zNI*jC8Sq!C3)gdgMiEBHKf%QZwhp7=f`{ZoN&F!6e(cqDjSW8mi9Ac=Qj+ZE?D*p0 zw^N=}BI$m3~q)-8eunD7nc}oAY?jqf6TMZtC)tRjC(Or=c)tikIC{?3M zdWXIr-5L29dO^25mAONUry+|DVS zb!pLUKK<2Uh-FNhjv1KL;U5XShw3UYf-5Hs4x*5zBo-VPn!yALmFD{Eoz6F6jVa2m zTYJ3tK^R=wO%xj`j@FVCbSx-c?d^&=-CqGu1rj{CD1Y z_j^yoT)e?7e3MxZY2B9_TySEMnf09cG-!mBX5*Ng%~bE;XM5GF{R$NCdR3DopO^zA zCv{*Zr}`Q<%oeaPmyr1Y3|+iv6|_6VTuHPkmk!mQ0vxAN7vN(D$;%WAyZ z*T!-{9OQWdU=HwmTE2&yJ#%q*VixL zrck@tV>&v4=MfzspUBV$1qZAdu=)mRk@!5P6B`ROPJAj5d#542QEj`4#IqR+(B?pb zbc3{1rHH|R|2z>AAy~$Ym}4gLl9C1SLM;cp@vfgE_3;DStYN zZ@RP#RxPRn2WCKN4D$SS_1!_zJuwE8nF%x$~P!9UaX^KH$~o!V!sU7{@T2 zUHB&?ZYoyjMXR;s@m&FVjwj14ibm}@d|+Oz0>bU2f!fqvqg3HC+@dY*pDB^+_t^-5 z)pX?z) z*dE}nY3g&Zy_#r9-Mdj4T~cbh1Yz}fa)Xb}RUZH5wp^MQQ#m4uV!6+u5|Zet87;Z4 zn!2qaOK4_^Tv8Yx4db*$q}0}n>(|OG+B@%CnH$nC>sLB4ir$8h?S9I4=T3Yuo()sQ3+`%6gu0nSY(b*Hq&vQ2&)QUh^25mr=yCbVLe+|}Ao@u3!}h%Zi{5?2^; zUu6d{dT=!O#P#MJdWeaEi&EKv&2e<}h(IW4U6O)#jVu`j5d?qF0uGR_>GJKx7k#%? zQ6!C2_L>VM)a0dPvgTj?tV}FJ!#@es3;$yB^mz6mGr=2FCZL2O!2Sf{JhN(_OW&(q zn&gAQn`Urpjhyw4YHn#$e{OYn;43||ZWGT~Bp`bRHcw|5Y6QpQeiKaQ(TA`l zfGel4hyIqZ>uf_TqhQ88B`BO8a7rhQuos&H*VvPOvsb6OOlZh15*jS$!6M@rWbI$h zN&ObE&Irz@Mm~|;;;hB!oQjAy9L}7=75WJa9h0l5} z9UQ(j(TYvYROll`ZK=jFGLIy}Qtj9nX9k8UWY8@{6e&ps>c_QV&YE=I=AxNQHR%pZ zypj*-ty#u6;cDBCO9Zsps>|kBrHWu$^tX`ObSVRRCJuU(TNbQ29P*AAoX- zOB$$2Sbdnjp2Lw!KBZz5gWI6PijJiMa}>-ZM#7RzStRf$7(G_7sO?URD3-M=WyWQS zC5e0H2sTO_=`G&sT~n{6#r~q|#35u;H**6+{|h;|TeDFqK~nKc%5YMOwkm5KI#q>Z=p%V}Bq@RwJ&~}?cwk&|=Wz$jeF3;Tjq?hZXg~kaU`o<#UX`lxP z)vuZZLSZ|sIZWDFe&8Z<7+@wey7JthRLV)r+YRJVz>4gwZp5ZzrGqL?+T}D13AIF` zZP&NmS@P^HK<%+$pLaovA@1FH^^RHB;=-?zUv%wE5A2Nv+Z9&w+JMm3%hKQVTZIbt z$ulRtH%b3zRuQ9`7}#kxY6`eS;;%)>AWN#Xfmg++Mt~pjgxS|reNf$#>^(!O>BQTe zcJGAk6a>r%nK4ea=u^rpI-(^4ezHhy3X%?7vRT#n#7O7{y->!j^zmdv!;X8z^rR0v ze1`sQFlr@%w-rc7po~QzDaR8QFNZX@Nsv`RSn7PFcZGjlP`y${B6yT}|F%Zh4X>|%1BUoyq z>5O$OWQxg9H}t9}p)JmUXN1GvvVN@A#eW)98tZVe9-8M1cHJ@1~^y6xg58K0oia zph7X*q@R6|ltAYwC$sy3-cum&eK~~3!+iemOPb)GHPUCD()vli}{VU1vD>7*hE$?gmbWN zP>D{LPyr(#LS@g*xy~dm{6_;3nE&cYl^10;jZq>TmVoyuk8~D}Jb}zot*+F@r+U!I zXo(W7MR>ZFk`L0iof-i~}u6MlIiE)!^@F%5oRqW*;}v;>+N zHV;Lb^9iHk^Yl9o6_UutN$$QUxs3ylATd${Z8C3 z@D-<_7PJ#U)8@*_7k2&(N8F%hF^Jfa56RFQ;AAOq49i$JcLPyXs#PdFE#Pu^+}+sp z@Yi@=4#s~(#t7xmT40ZoN+vW&8hg|m%_wKLw{FXc#Ystp1S&?jmg$N9Cb?mnrikRZ z3yGelGozLnmeOj{>;JSir^-1#!(BqFIk74!VnU@YkUS7 zkU&JA?gKQ$ISK`ZlI_VFxJXRdg_z^KpbrN52*2Qb(m z==*0;;osDbE~&)qAM4{e4W4nfJ4_9PS5$&+1~0U}Gne?B+_5q;OzQm}y%WQ*_s4a^ z$;7=%%iM#g%*|40Vqs(Lnj%`6_}hzRr_ecns}Okj1Ab-TPzq`>Ro8F3;CQ2|YRdH? zVo_L(Y<7i~#i<**d+|x!Fqdij6ECUIZ2Cq#@|z*I@lFYbXTLw-Zef zC8#|_S%?Q$n!W)|^w=*)*6#xa4=#2z_n?ktRf)AYWovq>86}*a)2668!H7yVCU{G$ z@>GaAOC(2J4u4$r*`?UK?R>t4=IBx z3M3#iJHdk979V)3#Q*=p)$H!;t(8Ux1ua9BCFbvBn|06KU?wnWwoW`feUepgRM=u~t!&Q8A`H&^3@PKRoImKJ=WxjPNz zIu=R3ez3ra--ohXNT*?4YGS}b1i5a~$i!V~799t*UZ)|X3@dsH{AU0IdA zWV&hv?W_z{fl}f42ru?PYY3D9^c%6{&||}osxycU_}?cbIPPn+gf-ov6>N}D(2JHo z^2-E9si_1(By}5j_K_&UAEQ$tRl$>W@;7!U_8Sq2ws5)7fv_Hd#O7B(xx+FV+4M!Nje!w^&dIq_k5L<;z}n6mD&u zfCE)E-B9d(XfS!TUZ29>fMGe)cghok4} zLO?r5XENQ2f69BoDuu47m=#oMCffxXUzkE$4Zfzpak)&4<)-HEiczAf)ywA(?~-d@0%YpO+ugLaG# zjbfifQhZ*@G{sM#tL2N0$6Z+6+BAns-q!+F&A1X{LZB3sZi@y(9$h^SJ+6N{apv>k zw4R2sTl}yqn@Fq$!g8(Yj;}xL_}KcjP_7BZx1w}`5mnorm85J{KC>d0XQjFDP=oCi z=tFhecDtbWc7et?euuJ$km59TE9fL-$wQ>+l#;y-hOLR{DSz;=af8jx5*Y%WedNNr z{*|}?vAB-F7wWG8xd2%r4ArKC)2+EAEeIznV_4`6lU5&@%|GkGeb zEyEBWfEK^LnQoxh24u119^_zXz3vOdHZdfEk8!y{g~okgojYM$k27JIU7Ve9e}#G3 z%Rx~`Pi@c|J}c>0bo4HC#YCU-%Lnp}(pp7=L0qe#B#`i0H!vNxvXC8l8@cIyI@p0u zDrngsPgjeNov$VY|L3UPInp@Y&d#XfwN&MEs&|l=pwhxpF-Jv{c*4p|nyua7>$F2i z8}}6d1^T;m`wBn_<_khbFji7f(xa(HKDGt!AE9}l-g;88RFKs_>gD3WT=)ox168sQ zu82}^;;!z*j5%QyD+3BH3;wsNps}wQ&IOXT^}7=!VzVkG;DU?bc{h=zoD5x+>$LV; zdMm&*WmI9opPh2axLs#{WlWnKF%akw(`Rd+yJ-%V=bGMiUs;zj>Vuc#1(!A266&Bd6&6*rJc@7%%X{!q#tXgSsFuwFY#|=K=}SD(X0I&iu{KP@ zzF{Ml`D7zZb+9WVxFKDVI7u$bjmRW*eI+CesmIxdTCkB=23efFdFi4QWXz*EY1Ng$ z7v9*!q%3nf08M`<1L%_;Q`yUuw-+DV(M=ceDv~!OUk{BB07wOKNO-zce<*QKUPv62 za&VCgYiG^c-iK>sj%Nydc4 zsIE|u+jqs65-%hA9yO4Cvt66J^O(p(NP3M-+&`hCL&ypnv5MdqvU6lfmZ_DJ*Ob$s zXxjL(7}}^JOurJcKRW+pzFr2-fYk?@9U!Z!>aB1;uu#u*5F(h`2N@}gd#@c{ZP}m-j;Z;EVK*fV$!j^4is1(^!p`6GR<}w|g;yuA6t(;-`=3NRG z3a2zqv^Bzx_FMTMkhsvrC8ue|P0G2zn`q5>I_1a*aB)z|-ZC?*b6sDY30G$65yjL6 zw!%D6jE)gPN=_8ZDfS8(Fy?R?%?nZp95;~)dzYw}#0z7t5#ytcKp&*NY!mG$d-CmR z^xGI;Ctc!Z=z6qSkV=uwsz5`jTX%DegwOye8E8u4?SBe-Bv#)tN%^`=a^HH;he<`G&#|^hQxY zub1-ChAKo9K6m4N+#;QqWw}EPyCgm;Xe}+$-#=ii=^dkJg-L7E3q@{Q*5;%V!KCcY za zn@T=9+YB+YV11)9Rx{zR&;VjFhYo4wW8o~p+lsG=gf(|zWmJoZ$ zwWxO#+m6byTKQc`Ngg3d3N~Buz)fl2(C4^9iR4#MqZ$D!JXIxpPx{{|?@ePdbj-JcHJ>$qs zZc&%2LSsTKI+}e!6u;8Yf3JB&s`197IT=6V0q0M}VH(2LHYH9<^zf3yl@-ARPvG() zV<`e@U^&C623IxKMZo_HWOuAxKNK3~HYivPNy<(R9QjjP7 zjl2~U_)?b)JEKYu<=SBPf%3+6E~oxYy-HhzgW429EF{a7GR#;!u?7;Az<|LHdZ6h^ z17?!_#C!(&5L9TP%bJ^I z^*pDhdSP=WOGzw-p(~@VXq?2`sgsBq1J+p*ROHImMU(dj2%Sdk1@d7Co zyoA0yFGu*bni?&5RY;fTEGiM{tCZ`+_Ku4h0%@ZoFy(w0XluUBv#SXIk_9}37Z~yf zq~^~AK<0$~6a=(URIu5so2*U(9%5@uGnl=X zE#ujHIjPbZ5rR5v$M(IVwQK0Pvi%RAvNVy_`?8t13F}A08FCQTX7%)E!oAA~uvp4OrX z@GSsajB8u5xC~4JLLrz$+k&)@E+-W+!`F-abNv4E-mQvc+LPkVodk?FuCvc2!Z&4c z80T!!?<~+J+g%`3DyCO&+)P?vu#HI%X4ccakHA4Y@hiY_gRtjgDx}1$I(BeounhnF z90opp0Kr^b|DGDY-0Jp-H5TB}(&9?h#0eIbvl9`{^;MGy3LuX9+ty<>_-(VDbbbe{ z%!o9$*TV*J5-T_GuAE?T{FA8wxd(Ap)>W7|s{~;PuA(ge01TL4E>ls>Y8bDUYCo%Yip)n z<5e0ORI3-^H98Wcg@%o>3z2;+g)pj!Z&_}LSo$^=T~~+SV-Q4rkC`%}1i%Hf(Gi+Y zEb$9tvUds$c}$TZ9@pQB(fKUT3Cu24il`HVldg|An6W!?+BHZl61r75Cx5){3rU!|M#G(NXN7 zP_H_PHFN2fnH*e@rxH-+SJIa3>$O&{C^y7wz{ou>Z5$s#n={sL6reSJJ zqd?muVbke~iRh%-J!EjQDE0qr-M*C{_$kY>U#g-rf==o>qN)n8Lc0EXBS=tHfE%KK zg5HLfqE!?Jw^&G3bQzms=gJH?*Rz>52;<5-AR~&5mXh{k7hypD+REt=Pl_zT@9C_Z zlEh({23p>W7eY{5ammvXvWU49rTkW%%*U1n*9gj_+A2#C^iYWOsT~d(-Qk(R2(qfx ze1xyoqRIQp2t(4 zz{9jYxsPY6N;W%bvTUewPguh5=cfB=;)FoV7IeYQtzNK-{EnLQ@}kCKG6+BKr%^vW zmn0*KgjEg(9`f3Ja*^yr%;K+KES-4%32SOmJ}07FeaOcFK^bp9pDxETIn5(w&*oGR zO=Am`x}PqX()IHukChwSU|XAxF|?O_cKz!!w*Ti%O4kHayp`xnTFluqtV~(HiGrcd z7;kU#&M5J7D)3KKcf$@sRZ7&`CZ<6C;5jcvi74@KxWRDG#9Mfy1Ie=pDjjyCi!>vS zm0TQ+rFi=#`Wn3P1L!3^mFzH|!q>z}YY?cygeK`iECW!p)W|t`jR7`KO>CXKlZKu| z+5Ds~HxDu9fAB0JGO12S&^rdK?P_CZ=A!c{HKeorPJAn8r^=tn7ta5RJZba4{P+L+ zzkmO)|M_43=fC_9|NsB%U;on+4sLutwd?92`0O|6^JyLWp6l-VpGVbqMgrYQ_Q2TG z?<92=q0KRvETF(y3m(z0K;~|G-)rWSkc5SB(Wsd>T0H=fi3hpNsC49(6yIsyYN15n zk7{2gD8!R)C`}<_;+bEv3^88*bg(cwZNi#J&B;Lyt+tHCz&r=BRTLB3kh93(XN~`~ z)te4#1#}k(|NhOcP2a(69zK-COkFbQZn5{DwB3ZjB((^SIaT|$iII9Vgf(lDdOqoP zLD1u*Pc9U@U28}E{sb*g;5l`M?f+!Ru=PT3od3NcR}0myZrzvLi`pgmV#|zIXe$0q zH|2{-hOl{FiWr3xB@Hk3N&eD4B@2c)A^@J-9!Tfo;{Lg$eQ9+G} z`SJC^x~8l7)Yf>Vmd+l`a9x)5L;co>o}tTtQj@AboOh?s|rj*y?S-rpY~!Bd8fJkz#@PuLic-Gt?I}=N+hCWvyIeJ z62U@rO3vygl{V_?DD#>XXfNZ!Y&i+SD`uTKv5~%sAa4I300030|LlEBlOxxa-d};W z5+l%Uk~T$=jNt^;kg@X2+zH(x%(89#jFMa8bo%Iq}HRCIZ z-fd6biBUuFl3k2%=mlMm1sUAS#d{z9{NKDIN?8>}Zf_TbK0zxjki`VL#ojKWaT=(N zN-r?P)n(O<0V%fW9Qwb2z6rQELK|f#PU_a8puaE?S}K-fne143hgeMh2>N-~uY}*8 zyZv!**>PKkv|zQ6@m((?%CpNb>pUPAfe;?%yyrcr4ut%FY;P)zRleM9QTR zshL!qnJZSan;JdQ*7c!oU7yf8&4x&3W$Z?XF-Vw6rLbQA2Y2-;Tzg->yn;7*oASBN zT%IRLks$(I3f7wky2a=nQ0I5U?UZI+s%!cpb_s{MdH9LL`Z7;@*OvJX3U62TOW>}6 z25n%bhjSzdA;D5UjumOM3c*MiPXv`%%u~lK&VOHI=C=aZDD5Ti>LU z5kvIZOPZ=(^%?sxlS&?lYnC;~9C_sq&Ng~0j}Chzd>g`b3Uwh(UuRQ+1yeN(@G<+X zTM~&aGXlXls5~DO?gzFaqrjAF-RMke53jqd+Q?PmlMl6c!YnouA&#Q1SJOB)^3FDV z49u~*zo_xo{9Pj>Cny&slupiZ*YzdtdbGqNSFqy$^8WV{0Lkxr!Zk~SiHY`sT;z~K zwu)^0^TxEGNLpsSe%XkGFYQEAI1QXHK`~1v~Gnx)bJX#-R?pun-l<}o&~Fjx=l1=WlZMN;sg8dLx56> zZF41tuSzS=kkP}U>-U#+W5{VaYoeASHl4o*nW9XNNE2h3edp9=Q@QlozKrK*05uxb zv>S{%(14VgAi{Umw>}a)oRsAYYS2M|snD>eY~nqe3@DwSLv*c=&f9hDan^<9Qz-G0 zWQ10IJn~$RHWhMvAq~iB>V{ny_R24var2GLZT zxC*^ob&n3NGMarbeT^)ZbU9#*7XXxPqWZS3}jW2}~9< z3K?j((CBs-xb)LA0cOGdLg3>j88yP7m8o#mR?YJP;ThlH@49JK`9!p6U-<8%LIETB zh3n3=2iXt)@S}H@LjD*>cm)7m53M|vhFIXT1^MlyoyE}y4>dUq^{Mk##UKL6xw?p1 zOdY~mhjgS4Oc1>e>cJdz z>gVV$`+>%>6^l2SjGi}3gRVdL^2HmuQIq5)Dyk=F+=>ii$dl3z+rnf$vtKhIEOH>K z@1)42X!&`>#A)4JFU3C+#C}Hk8NdSB(d(VBK~XC5c!VNN7v8F1pgW>f6}g}(3GSGy zV5%cCKc~=H%+(B+N1{xT9+Zh62yjXzTI7k=YsrOM6U;((((!Q8jK6o!0%f40k+)M( z<{qpOYo=%BOLz~WP&LMKA$(lef+>hXb?qFPTqdGu8&`0DzSf)IP=%`s#8|)hq_lpo z7;#M$oKoPct)Idd1nL|s6Z$KEArgr*?u&CE8?xIUG<~Bv12X6nWd*PQ0neO2{D%62 z&DEbrlDUA5>Zak*>ayB9%G9l5myaXuzCB=7drme90)|2 z1-6y4_D)V;OOIFfU3R3LwPO&OrNQ9OYAsG?-b8ba15vL*1CuXCrX?aps&6(olhh}yYWhF& zS8X@=LwW0LHOuc&W2^MpqFQPG@$svN<*$7m)NWrdDBryJdEG>Cu#--$s!XISvP@qa zG)`-CDu^Iq77?%MU)4{NJU22VY1~FcAXAR3+8ON}p2S>lh`P2Sz|JFC#T+4w0qB(Q zwg5AV>V_{Rt{f+u{;i59-5~~)Lhg(B2*u=0n836E>t3}hn;;$;erGbSDh%lB&^jt- z?j{7cBMR+nT*x=s8|h`-b!#ca%cK9VUK~2tP(_4XXce=pwumA=iTgMl<_gteSl=1v z>io2Q>R5*TSf08cks4y@XM#0E5gy!n5>fa>DCxDb-P49u+CxYz3B6$&4X3@;bJa*lPAoT{tVjtD_UcrDb*FuT$%>1y7@=6+~kb6`;q9|0u=8;-YIW@qq>fB8~mkp9_&3e)|5q@BQ0%mcq?r z(*-W+u%%Dz4n;L%C)`2q8gYTjRgIV{$n3V;QrrBXAS%c^)T#y*1bEg-BirXG{zYJ= zSaIX1e5!*BZ6kq~OUFUAJPo4h%LPZh75nm90N_npcC^TbUeW0sA8@mAD}iDsnisem z=bfF^HXe{;eQG1ifQcAXq75Z<=n~AF&tv#)0$3FsCAr%d zu2Ww}0?;Aa0xR#=Hpo2f*%QIE*Qv~4geEJtSRgDlV?OJu&W4tp0;4XZh!N4F&xg32 zxj5X=k*<&utF~<&xaaEHoxsXd-{Nv%^&J>t%m7IBNG3i4>I_V=>H|LQrdO~H3QKH_-UT>t`&)R!zI0jnfYBK(BJu} z2i+xKM?LNOwZ9?$*z_sNx~~>brxlz($|Pqhh2;|N8}eI#4R zwbmjzL5Hsj0+Kz4MdR67YO6~2HMB$1g0;vM&=D_p%wB6jes^(ks&ojMAX(6OI8@>> zidUcW+FbvkIWc1>lS$}60?-g`8}BcrdA@3tcNDQ7gLr0(b$YoIGfrnSZC&WBtVWB0 zIO41RV!{N37<1}C^+zx9hugRH7+wTJo!(W6xTj37fN{+=cxP{vdsoGeAZNSWPPajh z0U@7WOdpUM;>>%Bh$JAXXzW`x3W|uE2&+=elF?-UGvTiteb15GP&x>YiK>w56oyBA z1u_uq3U&Xw-#NU1Z`s%167Q-yR&}s#>Z{(A0;osSRHKk{{8zfSmU%j=Nu*U}`l2+& z=L_NC9to=~MH~`CirM2~#FO=5)_wuqjx0azN%?S65(Q7`@r}!>M|-PPd%=^Hy=?fu zD+0n|6arJ3=4h%UKl?DN2HR6|dRTS!&#;#RkA*uBeL+^*Q?FwC@QX6jHmzr21cqip zH_f#&L#lg^WpDbGQ&FgL80WLspX~M=d6W+rS<}?(cIfyyFTT&LuKopQ2_1MkkSJIs z?2373ekp<-`##nm3vgfdV?6xK{!Vx@oY@+`LIm)Ls2iqXFR(5C2t&cjC4(s>L*GrE z<9y4+bD?ig|KoyQdR988s1&~vyI@XHESl#U?|xIepuk^fPsltxVVDC91#L^2rB}QY z3Xf0R?UqN!V}33!Mb~@6A^UKStY7y;6-32lET@WO0`?(*9H5fuC`nly&?I@r04}~y zjILg698LZPGq_ug_H$J8XYQD~6V{S2B9X@bG2C%0C+VixP6{GhJdGvU3(cxy!RBLK zfIxOy25Zb}cOg`&mGzZcI?PKc=u=Xirzfw7DRyFHi}D1glyp`6uI|VBn#`CSg4y>J zlGWbj-k1^~yKK)7U;ZFbw3e6#N85FILk+TU|;{r<9(cKG^35W&sTv90d|x z9)B5(&4u28z(=qC87S?DN#YSaIuVu)B3hK3xwm}SU%P}lmn_;aEgq5?;;>A`yN8*K z%WYNMk2TRfHu6v%t2j?_!6PBEG1Bx7`&W{=HqMw}ZM}73`5Ak^GD@mM^PLZK%&xD= zyA>hryM4TPre=j6BlnncreeSukpT0rvu1?tb}PfngKMRYf93V--iP@SytP_8dv325;hK1cnTlk?hCz>>UNEOL zZecW>4X+P2p7J`s2RXJ=joWaL3`d5XWMEM#^zq`eiRHn%*0UVD6=QEiVX;<(YcSzM zvYe)7bbIOq$372{T@eOJRrDABrcc3%u2{ql5~%X6#Vy>YB`fkT)K5e&>#57`Qydp> z9c=dVXx*MzBfQ2~=0uGX%k|2PU`8fS3N-aAW>p`svcGma*w_E3TH6_|ngCuvp}&e` znwWfgJ6eAGmSD{?zh*>yenZpR;;@d{sa$A{Kd|5|H3x|$F@3<8kh5FCemA%>KFlzq zFq3TIUtN8FAYjI4h+D?C`)Vz%#yQ&|VO^CuH@{HW^1w5l`c1*2qF$up_8D>BtSV|= zdMeQH?AuoaE$RDO;H+P3(0|u}&M`qs%Zuk@Sh*(-<4Zl)Z3?NymP-q@1d)L=Q0Lgp zBc$f7)}-Ps73LkzCDL9*EqE#O#)0J~H=j{DVI+F)(&N-o`m@!l>)}RKI8=x1hWyy5 zr4*{kWsq2iyy9ZZSCQ9fl+%JEH+w!sf zl=<0}hK>F<{o@d%8b%oh8+2ECB~*KY%$r$X$l)SqJH@Idxz27!bZKS!ljiyh!h_jF zaN&`r*qiK0*{Y1=Zn5oyjKz!g3^Si=2n`(I@O}@};sd(NXNlSmA|!8_ARVmp8msWP zac_QV&0uKI5>PC2*&X}(jhra!2(Sp<;9zWe)~3^EAp?F3CaR}h#a+MkIbqst5>`wy zl1kK^D3}vf_vCCnu`bh1IZ>;k5GMWCO=~%Qn8x?L+oHK6d{cc|!HkGAyQ}|k^2Gf{ zcd2_wKFWZz%YHWu?Mi(wpxsuqdL3vFdrw9Es(VCIyiB4cPnRRMN_*&`$B4#6`5}i4 z)N+Z*0|h-#jd=V)wm2cJ;7b)8qg-@^9Se)L>YLC(pDSl9K6w0rVWBK_h}_q|{_#Hp z)=T{?Uk1@LzDo&B<6(XBDSY8G?1*U z+PM)xrN931zfi9j;8GUGfBoZs4e#*F%AX*Yi_cJ9gP(WkzMJqS(q{E9m9FhNxLr&A zt!FeuNaCueWpM6YrZhQ_9 zf9vFlbx?&Lc#W7W10$bmU?HOrAu6XW+`h)_$Wf3=G-vOxJL}p_UqvDA+^0h@a|z<$ z?F*V`C?jNzV*j~~yVsi&7jGIu3&o^s1(xaW@i9;NG;-)XqNs4%=^NZPY9~wtOc71r znzpJAwfx1o?AY=X`a$E?3ij|f&k1x`e=R+~`jH~P3lqZ{j@0yV#lBm87I9)WOd zOb9!Goxn@X2=GkT*s~7RiWNjU69B4hVlz8`t{Jmj{b@>{E=AuUALp!RP`PWnq~@C`32N zwnEk^UZ?YX@flX=sC7>`LI~J!cyKPy?@Ew-)cZOIHK`2VM!tai5u_qFRAr&f$vh?K zaWi2*bk8aFC2$O8j|OMM$6sTJ+e0uOp_(iu6!NMkL~|(MPZ4_>@Yrw?^ny`$==PBrlCWGNVV%)Kvo9= zQ|*-nSAH5=$+?i(Wpe4Dl2I&xsrc#hMWxi1IuTUeAsG4lZ}QnkPYySbjVnT^YIyvd z-vB!$SVvMxp|o3(wCIi?bT)c9stZUqq3q)Y8GFN<#o0feih7=&5v6Lr>%WJ;nfH{| zg=@oz5{N$O&d?+ytVC&fo=^Pm;RO57Xm`>1n(t$a^K4Xrz>U^C6hKS1WA3e0HEXU) zosW=4l|1&O8Jb`SG}R$nLz$(#gOWpD(7lAC5qs^72=zGE$xZe_nRu3G_IE4Ty4h!5;?3O2zHk%=q+L;H0j>$NRv*Jef(I3)`R>E{Fi@I zmM#G!i1%q!eAAyVwa9?@JhfW)`U9ps<(6*bUDAPzOx2f=4$pLn^L4tJhB=?W*A8e~ zi{L_PRB~KtsmH`^f8Z90{nuRhXC2+BotTo5nMy`T_)Hk(ES1&6IXhMEfYjfm7)P<) z2IY>%KbNEHO}C=>>Qfq;566;4uaUT&!v9rtS%wY+;$A}o^}#c)@ZT0Wa({)ze{Y;= zyB60Irxh4#D)@miFJ#W8RfvO|QR+h*)=E-16Zk4vxS;wZ_EXASW1ufaaR8~cPow*J zSGDLYRZFEUo6PwjJm=MFf*N_aXma(S+#t+IlHdC^Kh_G{L*oi^zD|B!b|y8q zkuc>$|6NJJZMt!^@ej9prR;@_kwLK2|v9>Exg6D>4K0x%$M| zxGA;2#R$ZWs$DX@OAcG}6yU2|yc*YAbjeYwsa``76U zTKw*^YPbIH{LN3^{fYm{*J%BSf8TZjTy)(Zc2)m}ukmF6BDemVpL~c{x7E(C;@|)N zt9qj!|M$QD{Wsm}qYpm%*}K1g|HF?y`sm;O?B9I&q23aGn=kk|Z@@YSoa^8j5WaJmpRY=o??)vxJnZKPv4?8417p z-IxFOfBlnB3a`GW8phR&Z~Xzxh7vBoj>O3*jIr;SlvQHC-8%~H)8eYi44cWiCZ#$Z7{;JzFM@7|`q+ZF z4xyC()KU0~I^Lsn)m+O05&|9gnIBe1#!@($FMI+eQd^ zRfS1D(bYfsTk=TYE5{!lGNh0ph9H;NNVFOYlOFd_t$H0r$p=$bn}}QKM-0>3pg?KO zBYF(3=J!$nc>8+7g}Cf?BJyH5?3^4vwN>la3T7s8MRHaXZkkOup!TiGl{Vf`W)+?i zJ#wROLg?Dxk6)%Ot=`RgKS_VENTU03iWZF14Q%VK5%HSHQ51mI z|B-TeEQQ`uY)+rFK8^_R_}ZIUK=sAd(B$@}e46f%{t_ zciQeGYkj=#jVgOk&mPV#_uAY6=ckqthI;7e|KtR*5Yqs0**Oej%Ln3p$7nEV69;ca= ziW=3dpZml}A`DK(rhew64;#-54fUy8YQC$}LL@sO&ikf;M$zOMEdC zXCKiaYs^d&Jt4iuCeP#7hYkwC@QmM|j@uOf5Q92K1$%l&_Q!o6O55gvX^yNb^({arz3N$rZ$B*?=`< zV4!dgS!TmQug-(b03+ypFP;RdA)JJ0KV|F?IyU-0@b9a>S^TQ%pUIypxU+mp_TJAI zzvw49{QVbs+D$(5`9;@OKyw!|xqR>EAH4sL48@YeDeIb10m@%9RjY1mHZ)axPaItm z+^jqZk{DRbVx5`LqLqv;$Tow6A9rP1c5j0A@H)v&7m&xlXq>p@1OUwQg-`@~6b(B! zM1eR>DFZl4jFgbr($i)z_I2=?spJx%t=@LKqeMFZ5HzYz7YYRRrRY_`!jjup z6gm>-Zq;9q_U_9D2+vZu*6-7497Qi!tpJJFyIq#z)b%{>@6xjQ1AjH_H) zf&T4MEoVZkT+5Y=Hw72HL#!UfTJ7LEfdiz=8E;1~YAX1pJ;GQ)8Fe2)Q#_y|AO5U& z8dpe4`yzLdLg+IYsk44RGbcN$AV$ZA1vHl{LNuK8Ow>8<17#jys))ZBdWbz`3`}U=OrII?` z=VEz1*2)obO*856;_6>U zzZlA7Rqwz1-be4`WTLaKe4uL`!QS_%-Ej2+UC^!S_3=Ig%!qniyVm znB`$Hp4%kzQ|Us+POH!}&jCCwkaZTnn}BzWk6d$W*Xr(HZ0>!Rls!45UaAJ4i&fDD zrDXmnRxP8{zbJaQUGMUV2x}UomF&s0Hrx0NT%hXHTimrV<*MLY2@eVCz6(1m8(# z|E%|(#S7Hg|RS!@Liw!rioReKM4M*v-gK&wluwuk9^XOn%)jkQw)DQf7y0BApMqK>lwI8*2#$ z5PYyFmBFz@ZJ=2WsEWmM$Y$q0)=Lc6NjqVkoOSlyZV#$Epoy8WU_i;tIw!2CIAG=E z+aHxaruWwdLh}(JVv5D-3TWA-{9v|HLpI2^&Mj>UMd(HK5iJPkjlpE{y`VSb++;7G zB@d4mUnLT=i)2R)M=IqA|3Uvb0J`u|=!Vp&B|K{Hj{|}|$sYn>%U`pks}h@?pz*Q| zBf|fC@v1U}-4TRrRqf5zyAfyazD|YdmT?ZhOpq%y3H;3Ta+cSk(|}2vm>`&v0GbC? z(@nK>@DxFp0VjIOlk))G`-Es4`)$(FG8*98nBQWp{IDa3^6>zCTvTFfa3mw;Ejorr-ngXA zC;qmvn=57AT%b}051N0bu-EkH5EzTwwgT{_VBx&^l@>Ro1mH6>Ul;jDF;fyZQ6C$8 zE_C(%p!1u)MvtL)7g8wI1~yX05g|3%r8I#=zb5^op?6CFQW)+i=UY-NnxRxMpv?w5 z`8XkPK9>L^TP{Wcj%@^DUQlGgWNmhpKO;!4-&njZZo-}Aq`t`Pft+ZcA zPcBgb`%u|Ueuc|(y546K&acEL74hi)?{ZgU(!-4UaLK9!>$v!ht9$=>zv}!W{_8fV zY^rGUB&ow1T4Ecwng?+);WC>>K_rrl!i+?nOfyd%!BlH=+tx+OZ4&D$n5Xsfy<(hO z#!;VBA--$+B4I4_c<~#23b|;@@&`(A{p2T0JNkuAn2&z`-aAW$w+m1_^bBUV0nld` zgyO}EC7UuYc&sqIPl}FAPjcq>b@Es;nw5w@@e;t3dt4^IY%^+Qrh#o~+i?OPXjb}^ zq&sA1$wsVFv^G|88bt=6B9^XMP}izk)!|!f8RM7O@W9NDo~l&VFT0BiHoJ;vPzP6y zJ}?zp-aq>Q%i9MI(?j%E9jT|Hq7%Y~2_j<3?a%9})?{HjG4_cngQidNZ`KyLm`{+9 ze!aT%iOfC3kZ&$+lpK$UQo-YW;B8b6eUNKBueDUuqcVw6PY_P3_5FSr?1kv@(mW`DnpkxQsarVkicI~u|QUfZ4#KXX}C#c0Tr z7Wrj5nOO6oLI=JnmgMGBzf7Fo_~W3Gn8A{VsvAd@y8mHYZRse@!0|9rgkr>?Yk*g#1?P}U8k_;Ei9uCCy6k&M5T zkJqfNB4JYlmR+&f8$nYmxyqx58?YGm(z0e*Y zTr3dl&K>@Rs#l-W=jf)>eacg_!Dd3EBxu5QzHLYryI0*_>yH*^ml)wn`*lx6b;+cp z0mK?!8wDCoHvS+M;nBD>{i`3b5fN2i5O;F-cc~oeennbo(pTUnlt!=ACa-|$Jx4%t z(n!fL0XbJEnIL9->|)uzab8mmwnTtJ2n|tJg67%{IyCk>IU9zc+8?HwsT@XjTxflR zx1X_j1AHYdzU+_+TI7YxF|)0JbeYU>3(61-Ha)BG8G0?y2CLA**mQ``+=vaTK2fKs z!JbDSyF^Rw%LFh)CIrv-9G9)c7HBacEgft`LLlgnXk-tHJF?+0_aH&s3v&;p<)u6n z1t*dRrLNQmMVwnSstm!MCcl^yy(AfToKJqs|dH=(oY2<&YaL%_Y`vZLZZ5|eX%@a|Osfrl0 ztvl$^d2#j6XciA*zY7He^)nhp&haHj>d80nZ0?`x@|3b-v&(>^Qq<2HG!HvsUq)YZ zGDja0Uk15+ld~i6?}HRckeAN&{B>};uY36ZRf^lt$;aO5$pdTfN(P-`lAOH)>-R&NA4tmSA91bK)j@aL z*6{#z*sg1EksbF3UZMWNCb3Q z5s{;zNh|Yip{rWM+%%6vV|w@S@HJ1Il8vfua{BHm>Zeg&8FzG6|Z2qysx7+q^hyr&(@u}SDS#s8? z0rB|~xX?>{Q~%Ge-1c%TQ;+@h{deE}**i;dO>d9=bqCdoi$dm695A5N)LGm7cOz0h z9F>Em97c5sI$nnQlk@881vb+}po6|ia)vCZYREV6-(c?#m7oS3OZ@ZmFp5s4SxbiA zcSgTRHM;`wAK>4>IWRA+ghpdHmV%3%=%jD`Ic`{6V61ku2~kg8#>mkKDhGv&OFN~l9=;U}~cqo5a)m#GkY+AdPa>Xljo$(fDA{F0`l z2vyS#m)2C!p~(e@LlqnDwn~8k*`wP*I6M%bd~))+LfEeU%=2WO-Vre)0vWDVeVQ$E z%{KWh`~HIdw_o=1T#?XKusEK&y7b4=rHbJU{$qeG@=20@2qZK2rN9e8_>{jQ0xvBPusm`xrvZR^5UNhDrtp9Y;wNIA(btjT49xz*P#Dfb0eQI#)UL5UzP6)B++f$C*x z*w-+FX$#w&JU}`yxFCHn0@NQtEOmo|)%kWS1%4`m$0FbR)riwu{+fPnYhu8qdkY;w4e$R>$qYR z8ads}dTj+4nO{AI=F#fgGz~J?<$ah`tozO#)!NG#k&jCAWiE|6>mdwFm8BPUFDQVa zU9MC$z8E=uiaZ>WU}|0kvGZx6>+#|nUx7gnzrv^*5(Slesg~ZU?`9S_^V&#{cBLto z>!45V%rGHxy9uvSzp!W{W?(BVV=qk}Znh9mi%vbFKkP4UQ~s*jwiQTAW3~9{d+)#Z z!8>{&J?T=KB%k}lwLa!UtP^|LZe+TbfBN1>AN>5CBg&{CfndPqi{n4k&s%VCY7=7Z zuf8813A1XcVT2#Ow|-j&Yt8H<)Y~j!eDe4TvC zhZCir)O%6IT;>PyQpcIuQi`w+u&~w>_n{86Nbi((Z-PDv0a-AgPLidRo4SS7p$#5ye10Z|D9jzTvSwP|RL7^U1kf{FVw3V*!r1B)WJp`Hwzf0%NA98pCyq#lqp zO?w4!M8Hu$UVXn6rJtd@xO&0DWK5rv_E2q#tqh%|V(k3#^t*O=L`+Qj+6_O?kT;gY zZ!2Iq{id7HW(E#diNQ^Z$ITbM!e$1@2~c({LWgvyWM_j22o6qW?zxh z8uLMTXDp-nmn{AioFHJGhjX0#N=%9DHsmbe|@wzbaRI=soCG>|nwivD+g8T9qH^_aXo zoO5ggT;ORE3Nn8gYp$VIn?|U3`3>T(6MU$jQJ806snwZf7iWzg=`=6{dzKln598To zApPRlk5_+=9am~^q~d#F9CVgualneXEtvJ^9{_PFD&{#=JdEm2KZ2%CAh1EOzKH+) zO-c=AYG;iy1jJTNojHWl1h93|_cg}kHA;Y4|3ht4V>{JQe*Zx%swtB9CHbnn$x7G0$NFW~pA*>>UvI6gRq2LS8LQBuzDSF3Tr^ zinDR+tM41$L`vVrXz9aUw9$FFu=UBKm?#pY?ReFcZo2QLQgoNXT(k2V=!eW`$AKn}JD$Ik`pasnH1Fds^~~+9&_Zia-LfJJaDmpov)WCZ>)*zB z8@#!x-J{Zx=Pxbp$2ZhRT0r*eXkL^8n_@B*o)`EpB~(blU!B#I%b7NGOsdNCO@5<` zBG*ejlAtRXr))+n`SwgjqsV$1RLKh8f8%sIU-GcdgzJ%&_e>8V@veN7;-hm(to)~_ zdj-^(qB96-9Vnq;vO-3iHahcivYu&#iP9LFFyjn+m~!;kChR(C}F+)j{WW8*AwRRrgjiDiwww?GT`hzzEI8x3@nMWas* zPHJ`kGU{x(du{g(J!;JJ@Q)5)Esh4?c>0=t%%%eKYJlJVBS@G@4hlQCdTmhCC#!MEzvWj<_RFA47FM9 z_xOkZW%Vj0#Obov6PzL9hLXb9W7HF3VJ*0(blc$Nuc#t zwQdJYwGMIS!kc=d^a$QKiY^8QNDBR4_4S0m(oMXOVobMu$@%QA>jJ%$a`&=GapQ%* z;ZnZ&U9iMcf-OW^0FhOm!N3f-5o0r4D#*W>e~Fucr}-o^!K!96#K#NbrkaSG3l~8) z?~F@)i-FZLyo(;z@TS@At8E+PFEjg_V@2phv*OOXF9N@kj`dv*AH$~(KrNd;p+W5h zp(+sW+OeNO_9)Vg3heFhoa>DP@BDSG2;%ZcYzXxX=EL=|RG9xLooE9+khA6*!1rZz zm7h%tLy>^wr>6o^1Z7LTlK_ite%aS7{?$Q8;HmyUGM3Dyzqz;NUBu@ zOCYIPhJAYpelw3cOT~RYxe-b-S4wp=EAY+<_$wBQQJyzNB z5PA%DvGl|cP9*2F-Qk0@7zjuSqsQB^b3n4+9^d`Te`etFyVd_;N62t=rsFSd$-}hx zBm_G}vv6rlk*(#UB8ga&aK5{S|5k5c8yNdPJYkIRBzvzrUy9JGHP5PvE)#EA`Eydf z6AGowRF>_Ao}8BJ`r(-9pk>{yNL$yo=OQo^mf{<&5o3iLyn|k-9R0zTs%op|xd=tV z`*87edgf#K)Nf%-+phYn??+uojB`GoUj3;HW}WjxHKR}sVSby4`fAW7mCAoyVF8+) zJ$~1_!Fcq}A8Alp&U}yt?fs9HNc60y$h%tbxbIa919CflwG59JUn5l4@b3;=T#x6? z?G5?650O)2+uW2M+sz-w3hIl^W2t=%KQ&=p;6op}$p8?DUw)MsDfa}Q{}safn}?*& z-&jF0y^v2ywbl!%9=oE_kTS6U_RT*gXrAxB`%X*(O*onhUl^SJ#(+GAR*Y?~YBh<^ zo=RyF`$ES}buOMmG-oWs%;SphzFL|?dE!DJ z%5{b9#Pre9CNWCTnsVlbtTG@0(<@-83y@t^1)Ziq{2p)8mzY+QAeyzTr`|{pIBH9T zpbt2YN(Q$=edQ_C)$*YLA+g(N*hJTQq5rYzHr~ zJh3NgV)CT4kXDB{uc8_AqJ?)m*b%T{M)T^3xw!Yj>l!fV>@w!aPk)EDwZQ3I!;`CO zs1*<0C7)00I;)?#?Fn*;Jar2hJK7HoPPe<{TJyda{#LGuo?DA76?UD-3aGXlk>C1* z>8q-Oui1|zRwjOTe#fR-#+|Z=z%2~uEY6Pj)p3uoPnAJ3S$MJPihrGDOyB85e8>i^ z6oWS1jSHe&-2I02@oSoI@@rPeAyCOVhI~l=*A&Y?L>)*#i&B#$6c2dWdo{ z`sZvQb6_7(t9e^IlyHG)hkj)g^zEqR)jKb$418s)d#J76lqw^P+!W_Mh2*AIgOXRX zzkHjzED4iRuV+?X_>?X7K$2T=_X{3y^U*U>Tv1(6{5?`a3q6>-)U`H3euIN8>Vx>B z)St|E2{k;nt>Drhu|X>W-=p^ZhVg_4X z^9hX9=gZT5T{+C#n7BTmKD?Nhu!i!iN@^G#=Sm)s8;M>C?+A0)pG_F z6QW(!LKUbNSwh=RC(zBxPj`Q;r4;(qxGo!F->qSa+Q}ffEI5rgr8Q#(77`PuiR!;5 zZ{+tP(|@r_HQ&I1r;x)2yH*MC!H!O3_Jd2+s_&l5!C)Jz+hf=<=ou0pmK|_7(n3r- zNm0)|dbY4LiqCQP{a_RzRjoh4^g;%tQcqR#u3{`BTVIQPN#1ZI`Nt#`O>Af>Cx_U7 zx-WP~bP<*CeI*6q`Ij| zSw+F!G~vwCq6*DTgrYlt@m=K;S-)#k7^)?_5rAKR;`Gj+HLsKzEdzMUuiP!ePO25- zV@WViiGvNmWs{ffx;3_NQzsg4Y);Hx9eNeB*Mn51K;yw;+tG^?Q64oUufq!FeDJ;_ z+TWR-cHLAuAq)#9D>`IrNyBz+V)={JW#^tPv`)u4#dH0oW%jFXlA~VVslX0TB3Qgr z0{Obmr5iX%SN}uC&BS^uhlHfL*w}ZVsrEkSbo=@w9V-91cQoFR5SfcH=bE6YVmAXC zQwO%HgTY>`?`y(@G3THs#`KKZnene!b92ZLXMFxTWunO6+9@yQ7$^LRT$TLYaZ3|5 z+ElymhzyxFiiTW@;I93kJKr5xl|~~H>k+6n0jz@I{;}RUpS6$T7l);!2|m^bBAC5e zpTEY{6RB(DK9P7>t7deyKG5`d2-hqO`z2r#d>a9tzV;Cwyi=wH%_<*65&FfbX}Nr{ zV4f+Ac4QWzvAt9S7>?tP@sZGr9D;&J+LAuV`!Y}Qn*rOGBp3_4l zu)aor@zd+cxHi!gl@h4X^4$42^gfQ1m5sY%fE|vH_|Kqg$%3x0b|?ra_#pIYVcm&= zx`{Cyx%whXu?WwSJ;=l^C>#|AK&egNs(W-Gn(Dp-!<#mW@0>j>l_NqiW;e|H!(d~z z$f^tp9FMb)tr8jDh+YDyB6Ho45!|V1^+uoJCA`~826V)(4V_M+EmB6EJSsW*D zlx5zTuoO=4*IqRaZ91G!9D*d!I_Z+HT%Zl@)$Io$taS}ejWjP>!a)}Aef0Bpm-2{2 zC0^~ObKv|iL9h&6O-D2JDA+wRSyfqZOu8?+-m-~canl%j@>?2m?siifWPUmO*iHCr zw>P0q;BzkxD*0ML+3#AF37-g{gUxFM7z`VE80~|a;lH7Oh@D8*D||vuj*AAHWtPO} zRwJJE0@@rb7#p5b@9d@w?KI!;^~r_Tf1Y#4nCt(l2A=!66k+boF`~Gdo?@ZDE;;i6 zM9d_ns@ipqLY?dcXp6X?wBW&RZG3Pu7G@7*qpE%1-_@*ue+8k)F!7QA4rjM^x_PTV zF0q+u8g$mLQCc%ED0_e_*AJL4#?p*Z@eA281 zbPCJ>yI6NG%0iic#HwPMcHf^*m46Awew5%_JGhejt#v{Tf*cMsQ(;g_pcsnPN>caF zztaqjkYJ@zgFHgcE1XL}p>``^wNEhpYNuvKI`AdPPSn;BF54)0L^ehRd(3AGbXIGX zzd5F%h7cpOcg#h^2n;FeU9QQKI?VoVFsDvO6ej``_~OXyNbd64zijTV8=n;dGG4eXl127O%D z$^yxOF3}H7Jqj?+_Nz>q%n9Vi9}S>XEUm+7v|syChYI?m#L*f1NljpcDILmvdE>pH z=M)&DKv0DkS1Al?t)A01S)xKmRVkYa|0+?!h!h0{u!F{* z0X(hQoASu>H`*x3fRlBOWR#``rMO;Ea7jb>8VxRcOGq^?R{!Te`^6Li<8Q1a6mnmM zJl*vM+;Bi;;#da56)?f1{hk7w`>ob-y~p0H(1EH^oiTraLgk6~91+V7_r=Ir{hZp}a?-K4KAE*pyb8{jp3Jqw@ry zz^RVaTh<;G;{GD>OV_To39Du^2%a8>4pEa5wLlv=j(%>?OV>xth{YovADQKk&zIzb z5g)ej`_(jE`dWl=1*5)pt4c9asS~LnOg9j%Qs7iP4bXN*8#>7Y1Q;OmK#sE$k$4-P zr`GPmBB_1kR1$GdOot(xP4qLo>-kr+jqMXmR&9RvMgzX)(2ripCH8^9p5UmOB0gpX zUW&pMD=A$?LRL%Uy^PA^0@54#MZFI{rW2fKWkisj0`H$5T@m^FVb!$BZ1JK~Ce5%C zB_y)U`V0wjaD&bz!w4C3C6LTi>u2jvT&T?jMVL1_^WH4b&bGw5KC0HvXGHLjbX4@F z`?>6E=Y=5+@`2gjvd2%GI{FhPqjkPZ# zVP%{iV(~vj>&R<bKrqOmhAxn~M9b3JB?W)9XU=b#3x`~usfbQyxZN(G;77zIn*vfHFcYRwViRFO zAz430!xvl%q_9`0Q(zKZB!B_s^p<@4W1I6*K#S;4KSZo1hilYZ65|1%r4rab=z*)` zrDe`1f-n{-LxeT0l%f;_l=W;1z$xY!hS6apaNPP(M6LE?5Nbx`U$nn$trudPo- zDsn6GNlr+@BHKpWZT~4R>t3|m%G$z`QH}g=rkaxr9+o+D)~^7nIraD7_SJ5OJzexG z7ERcyb*zno7K*`GPkcZ{T3_9MTTi)j{hA~<=DNU&@YvtwK3eB)E=Z&O)OQinNP zt98q}Zi~axs*cjmmRfbJ7l!V1`j!yp2WrDS2w-3iM#1|SzEPv2mRSRY74`kSX`BeB60>$|ItN*dX zfiBJqGSh!@3AyfJ@$cN4V$i?>w8l34-Iu@PXa3#qpylQ-1r^eR^L*vzGwOtVTp(yKBE!|R;XhGDK_?-Vi{*}YpBbp_{rnN7wtm9-qoAx>%7_Z z-%Y}Vz^pkgssoKvYT(J&leTB~-Cin|lOOX44SSRW4sifM0x7Q$YYm}1XLZP)7fu{| z$aQ95CnK7A1d}&dlZk3#y&{hkUmU{7D~eLduNXXf8G6gc9^%&?IEM|l{ouB);i6di z%Z0)6gNfFktCwp-ra&E`10#k;(jjT$MfAPLB z{Q`S#P~D^eU%H3U$Y1~XU)Ee7deHv$kN>qyFm{ceg>`PsFpJ7l>j>CwQjV9*M}wYg zO1;e@cyLYfM{Vmw_>}d7f%9xwnKn+@gyuA(Qi15aqnXgaIY@gV%6B+EKKBdh>dzzJ z;R!kq+t#FOrK2DUS!gjFdg)Lo$!8dV_hq1y`vCD+Rm2{|7ZsIJQ~3=V+)1wf$**XO zmgyp1%Ga)@QT3Y(E+}n7&1NuufnRnag?qM2@~mZ5^g%6!?Gy0<5Wm%q|1<+j!6kPUeS)juG&Rubw&- zK7nhZS-psZVi^saD$_GK3P>Ur&AKN*guj~{O0j@>%wK@Rn8krV!Oeya2lnLC9Tny% ze-s(JI?>l=Iiq4DrfR3uZcW5}=z9qa_q1(h5|tXmBpG;=!CA5!_Ov#edJLB^5#kix z{{!Ty#G((AUBTJ-@Zu|kMTJdDGZL%raIXs91+dhoLBfWQYtT$H-ux*UPP5p>Mqm%b zpOI09F5+h8$_gBrr@y**^WWC4iEMeCo?HLu`WPJb#n)die){#3U;k#gc=Fj7OW0p* zom2?_VIpa{_s8w8n1Qfi515sIgui$sGJc^CF}%ZqMjKu!!6z%ijSJ0vWtE_G{h2nW zWROFRML!ah$xUBzJRk4kMkY8w_=u%_9n>*yeq zzX*7LNkl$*{)ylx#cNsps%7bKx&j@=PJ%O)LvP7fRjeSttXA@yLf=%~8UEQcc+|1hv(3g1>U7EzSTC{7%-U4X+DfLmu4TZv4&$oVa_ zqS(SxV~GBsM=w52)3~jnpThHeeCd1nn2DBb_;qGLYQ4CKN~$(aph`hG`30MbifgTh zy-xv##Kh))WZ3(qQ^KJ-czeUkjqlPXe{v2wi$y#kDy(S7_%zUEdqqm z>zq{tMy$o>_^GzoY*rjdj<*R9oOT>=E6wEY;q0R6R)1Js`k+=Oh#4_hI`CC6*aCnC z?Cai^MM}obXus#JYw9h=Sd#OL@sCqym7woy6W1cS<0t3OnC%2%&WwP%aUvsHZbitQ zMXS(Fg;q2PBe$&+gvM9X*@Q_;t z5KVaq*X7lVtA8GQOJ<=cLU2%-V4rGn%bY1nao0zR^fLAJ=^H%h+v@6nQne!W9Vpou zu7xlv$z$d*Wb!!pw6s(!v#R{2i3;7J(EHgn5_hITaoT9&Wd9 zf52ZZZH5$E^vPI??F1=@Rlq4jxXaXv4`SxbU&8^2nEa(;be7Qo2tBkLzs5^HoaQA@ zuU@oHy=J@i>QB_ZyL$00ivQ{qCQVNRzlLes)r+;D>a^!6`iGO0iP{=VsLRyyMdvaRDUAV^ zDivy|t>amOsf`AnAmr^J+A9%d@4ZBh1777{}#SDawabYZsprkZ4 zw6Y25Z=h1`5N@US5nEk@Q#!j+8V8d>6L9-lyORAuspo+N!xZ*;M9gn1d}CJ+FGY;q z2?v(GKy}Z+P1@2Vb|ym$w2fsoD*VE2*K^HCTnktP@6i?kNTrE z5gsqTb}fZU#8Z4%V=cNyuy_wAWqX?Q?Uqr$dYLn>p`eFNP`iLTl`5qy3Af*;L@(Tw z(AGH=l4^Q$5$ZSm($%_ROG`9x7+M775J@U;!}q>>CJ&7wg|$L9U0ZqOF7=J$-{`6; z{N-{n%jOf3J&(1sBZfR+UuP}AvjaYcs`FxN1FvaOiG=L1j<3Ni!Pz$T zOS5TONn+x^E2;xiLVq~n%k=1wZGAU&?)=TQ+m+;s)SJg+4P&vj?g)0|AAzt zL${9n3I?$Ne9DxsQYC6pFD(Nz6%I_uUt}7nCV9D^JOEnYp>OWK}UV!kgrAgM2Nc4V3=ocDKbd+y*R0s%KMBvZ*EG z@E?QH+Zx_VE>@FNkalO3!bTfcEz!hdU9D1rKEzoH&i^m2onDZWohYAvEyAUm#`x8ug8}fvunuV^&MNQqv{4=}zDb2o`Wk#Wm|fB?Pk^#{XznJ%2kb*}4WN+!#uCYg z5ov)4# z(zK>b+%Iw-KJ#Z$J4_hqEs*hdD;Pd z7Xn+=)~j_l>SkI|?7&}Z-9Z=_wZ-SX_$*^4U$#)Z%ny(Rpk&~r`G@{OwMW>`2(`2@ zFmoz2|J)!3RQ@>MEHje)Mh2ZBWbzLL)ZpT8A5KV1Rm$oyoa4E!nUR9TVxo6C9#egH zX3TVg=*fd>alwmg^uFB#3ymJIDlR=nI7jdHFJ#k1$k!OY33~ZLj zpOr_RnJfa^L9x3^n&h?mo9Qh%d3hxJ1r$$i7)G{zFPY{tk90ce&ct&@I%uVM2^+uFs!z+|ijI0NAsst9GhA@!PRgqCYq(;GBT6 zL0!|COe^~d{p1vmQ}7=RrOY9@`QvdQiNN z;kcwdUv?EH;Uy7sD}_Mz;kRg9RVO8!_Ymi1*Q-#}WP}+VcXpal5PF4Xn~q1&f7BK% zPAIxDN`|p zCe|`->(f&S{zJkPKZYhqr?UY>5D6mkc{9^V&m?p;EHh)8okCyhq3~5t4ipUf9)(ae zo=cpzT5MU}h_6r9stD^52N~%Ua>fX}Gg-?>x}jiWo@uIkg9I(6xMonRFc1ZfI2auu zBN`sg3H6y-BmL#S{VNpEOhPK01GrM(p*g>Cb?}A505Z|O)hyLD>OOa%NRuePn9+yo zbgqJm!4q|9x?aIpkf>b3K8rgz)G_EI%iH)*A7(*-6swkLGHkg8;eGlgo}$%LU^)lZ z{=!bnKxz_%7-$fs&^fnuKm?nYkvr20KQOQV7pP>_JNP6|YMRA|uJE~qmJjFX2A z`{KwwzTftBicU@kYH{if_&MyIp&45BEfhEGO%(9Zn0=)))%)$#NJXz6!f1vCZ6qq3 z;sV64>>oA|;o>u&k7?6daPF8fS|1cS%OEoQ@^k%cm7KK{6@b%E#e=~wPqyalbL6JT z`H{1f=lc~Ki0R=&$@Ax+3p1B|IH51?XheJkZw$35ooGXkJyxkM(Uq@A1}l13m$lC% za44&`@YSD%gJQt$qS-UfTQO^tPbkH~9;0v`ZY{tbY8_D~$*C@euD^)*h(s3SsIUpX z=fnko;ju+le2w0^WOJ&n(*Ty+=e{L=Q*7L@0uYC<ODAt{PG6 zM4`^x7!8mL-b}xi8d!2F#B<;Akgl6!PYrssTzy|gh(l;2;b@ORaUd}V4Ude*P6ZLh zsQo44-@Pdq06uZl)W}#$T!ntYgyC1JD;$>Bs(X|TG3L0P6Q55fh^6-k4ZLAc-uXkb zasHA&sfZq{)@YBsId$$0Gq)Lv(CwV8e+1q^aWt=chgdz7)1=BCmE`G6Ja3`|Jsy!V`F z383E@u2`H9Zw3hK`~OL2)*q+J;cS(xthR$XSKBIjCe;>QOWI-2L^p+YUXZfU~m= zpav12pax}ApKkydoqzv-~)X5EGdoKRnxp=*UpFSYbpg>k|3srL-aEZ8hq8t=Ib#!RmVHyT%r00 z=<2YJyg3L?5h$O~fe(`v6V17W$23e*_RQ~Y3#;?9E6LvIey(YaO0`p}%E)2bd*+7TJfFM5|DL5gghj0-JHOSNYw>cb9s zqezDt_?eZy`VLK#$^7Hd+{FnJk{YU6inp?~dy}Mr*^R$@;zxt-k>9uM^&B)v4HZQT z0@Ni|s&8MlP^boYYL3Gu#0RR8&ean&@$Cc%;q_k)Q z%n}gDR(Fe_HQOMNlsE=aG?JR0>5VKZ(laZd$cSV-QU$HFopt{JZ5BhaWv1R}rya`r zNAxA*=iGbUJ+fW^k>Le^y^)B@tgMU(_v`m@9(`yCTT+aM2Uwo9l!{^=M9$^WN9 zV@lbi`rvN?s}+YkK8V!d5Wki3II75e8z_S8N^{B0W<(I zQLPox20@uAQTL04qzGsc6wL*s9i$(Xb#psn3t>X-I*!p2)f;~!M--o-569_tu^Yn7 zEV8BaG;JX1>eK3hNk``&YEzy{W0cv94lU5}6j7GsutSd))CDs}opckNAetr}gv`b~ ziM@;Xvgx!XIm(Mt2}eH+$M;_C^7I;_TeVu)b6s`u+Qf(VGvA!M0zQp^F;SAip82Y zZpEV#5McKergQ6#O;(l%Yr9GLu|0<1P35 z_yh#ME@iWWhz}O2l~ogPjFHri-|V++B?@D@&{0n^5`S;U^3a7owAz!=8LHTAr~`tW z!9|9{!RY(V+29xC&Z4g6l;o7Rcfbm{V|Nh+v4mNYBW2(rFBv$kPce`3wyN1n2<753IdlIurbCuzoYDATWnj)VI&1=+P%WmH1>*%jzV|+ z&9NEZQW=04e|O5Nue3Sa7s|MaQm&~&M^?JGY7Y7nUeK{;$)MAoS`a}|kIPZ4#lKBx z97j&l-*B|a2Tvr&9jesO&qghQ%EcqZWEhfs%2t$dmoIcI`HO8?jyuyC@ySjZ^*(el z7mLAX)J3hDTD z@c0*Brg}&+X!nt0@V`LJum6qz6{VH<2P(6wV=g!v^vY+qC!Kw_RJtqGSn8+XSmi|u zra06Lis@0=4PRXND{5C#C~8x(S_R#)gcQQ2ZZLXQ8o>&Hm~LA&a<2;iE&NLMuip7p zHJspYp<3VEU4}X;Zgp$GQ@&|D6N6}6KYboLI{5{%CuGOj8^Kw;(E9I9MPz zR>+EG6GhbAgXOmL`Fzd|6{CHHYX1J>{EreLTIgFeq{;QR&#xJ2M$nM#H@0nb&Y~z` zu7>IKCZ+RUd#(kz5O?G!qJ)Ixfsv@65q?G*2El;1_105$UYb09#t&^Vhj3MvQ;m#9~ z16^Xlj~e{S>hsxS)ggZElJ=EuwLAyXM5=vm5O69qZAEsCizePF(VxzbnpVj$WU&Uz zG4lzqh*DsQ`JYLJDRNVdd06;T3m_0}I;B2pd#4S?BwP7l+1^!VH1d-m+=Yd;=+0%`aTpY2ThPL zK;@10YYdIWZk33zzh2{z|2_x5&q%g5VgMd~Q`FCTsw1BH6M(x?r5J<~+fVTYVN}iD z=LMzH3HKxd2Ua30OG#1L49WUS8As{8DBUX|*VTXs=hi;eSX$5Z4YMcclgDvYz3 z+_wx_p|@F{y7K51#1EiZN!WQ0V4T5B;t>$hDYM=L6-aW-P!>~|Y*Lp3oJnR_(_%dD z^Yy{+z2{%YMZ!_OUq(@fe!8akqg3M9B#aM#bV0tJt|T`&0Ds>__Bpa^x`2LDJpcMf zuinVZbY%R7V%sD=OyfMEP{70bRHq+BVAnsyT^pu~`>GWUPJ7sHapzy%iRcw1*Xdai|7ui{gZk2r@4xd!dAhBJK|WD=p`+;gqaUP+DXo{$tUn1NU3Y$2_;0c; z`n$UR`|BI?bJ(_3VEs_P-HcnVQ-meLhAdW@ZaT5-bAf#!A`0QBBI?>X5Gs?OhC3Su zJ_N>Cm@UEqpXXdNTpgd(w<|6ut+M*@sT<+~h_ARfb(7mwx<;+CrFo<8%J?{^0(oR& z4O4F-z=$c`HIpbKJ|8ZB+p1|hQPP;eon5nT$4Y;yrdNt{>kL}VUpN(0wL--NBe=(Z z_hQpFKr|+E&$?ITE`{sRuDz^`{~%BoDVzLvp#gz^A#v7}*BHKoLs3#IvZj@%+zIZ& z$}ylfm;sRlj1LN8(U_mB9|?xz?iIUjIRoyK!;Ct0hm%Mwu32NR^C|>G4yTACDXXmZ zla0t5o013z^ZtQmY+w0uHX@i+=b|4^w5tb~S$G_xXP#0fGIvLm!nMT7%rS?-o@<)+v)QST?Az~)(NE2)Vo z&qmnaGN{Q1rCZ1l_+YqFV1(kn{MlTNv|Cj-N&mV=Kl?RR<&+7bW=xZ7EkIC_&?mf6 z!5Q?hc?g(6f4uwbp!biLzMF+1gWK(nBGKYoELM9!DM>xI*JMk!ji_D@(`NL+g267k zAfAqJk3(Ggo6cN{cW&HK{FAWD$&1C}ahq&`b#*pbT4iY5XIy0Ak;<)ig9=vIS$g#I z`#@VvZC=&7nJM2go&rld97XC@`*q83L=ICeTw5Rg>q#95Eh&F)*@|e|Pzz*y>e-8Q zA8%a++#e5dv)J+(?3pi%MF?Ku%fTLLWs_aEm~h5&+jg7iS2_o^%zTo&_~p5-eG0Z` zK5P)$T;V$As75QUl5SGseXMc|)83>1!b!)Ezwa6XIupgY>(%5})xKH@!QTxDz)(H3 zD(>@m6JfVG39yX%;>-wFcwS6xB)%C*BufAsz zZ~^V=>T$ReyR^neWtpXDaRd`Q*Cw`7KO(Fnl#%o$oHDUgfr&AFwW3D^QE zTt}j>{&NMa>AG@R$l=l*mgXp#X=@r!T*9%z*^Pc0P&gqw!52qCdXSYwvv#ZR6b?fx z19#@S(tqOfKjHXq+AXU{sQ{nJa|(&NIIA;k{}@(YC&%!U;6Hqqjs%KTPWlIpCw- zojRv3lNYB0-n4_3zUu&f5Kb@!B--@mzIrrq(KdfGPbA49Q~vlvfKzH>d&$^iG02D3 zFf^9+`ClYz$~y@MZgk!e--r{8V&*QsR|xgP{4(0bSsbXPrTip2RS}9Gu$tRrCZ0NP ziH3I5lqkC_jlrl=o7k!8Py)Nm?JufMO$;37aRz3qNcV1yc(woFDMpHxQrusBG}uE;CDQsNBWw&|xKzVISVSnDUcRzlknMuW-n`F`@568&E81T_;#SU~E$3fOJ?CSp^w)2(@`ckBu?|bu3e+Hr>L3w;m4Nf~(WdQ+#rBz~{pm_lw39k$x*$1gH#)YaLeiLfC<1q; zmJ|J8?lJ`?sgX;b{5lzgDcPR#i)rP?xDsq+4uqLA-o25Cph*uU5&S*K9OlcV)ly-S z&NV_I5y(|CYKU4l(tF&37=3Zv9zHbo*Dq$t+WMD|gUAcbQn<7SmGd{5Elyja8fP2` zH%VsfXqOtCv+eKT$lK#!V_(MzEM3mPDC~h3vFxMX zU;=cyr6df_7Ryb<#yfSmCRl+&=%OvGP+!5g!iHMOXCZgs+oETm64;mXmmiNpjh-h^ z%YlFX=Rw&8(MgXtU377xaIb&!wz2_SN41(;G1rTJfazFM{hKa7h4YM948d8Rx(*WO zntShx>MV6I9YWqcHqqTQ&V%IT3-cKT&mgxmA!GeJB%BX1u~ciS7j>594pXy@;NB5@t+RW+ z!aJ#poU$*ezG_0e#X%R8oeVDT_(MG?`NTD46s)}eX>h1cx??$msx&&1fG*WS0Fk;B zMr}eh2lmqLQbKhqoEH5S4{&Z-al{Pts<7s$sXW%I)+rKI+<=Zaj#H6s5v2MLHWZ40 zHWV*fS}oCY+3K^Xjv0GAnfq1z9%knzOD&chg!vKJDCC8-ZB?9q!xs6$nYWCT)yP-o zz|zd54IX8+giGn@IzvgV!-7IhZM*?&{aHZRFTJjQ>55g=Y~GbmZ^o^>sjBz2z2%+o z+9#{Y&wi5r!j1gpE7t5u+x~7_biexoZ}z`bt^WDPKf`Y~#n!LG-~RS!9V=;AK&@ed++^|-WUCtkN7?0Lw<7o+WTVgrP@Y+-EOV~{L7Al z8*cnR-2W#Y@n2eBPHLqf!T*qR+i_5|HkQ#g(Y;fgrBlcE!`$m-1H=nHj+b9!GY6X| zdK!tbE?Yq<(RM$3Lsp+YeEY)=2lYve;>K6f-G|py)4>3pjD^j6R_ADKlMQT(G|M5-PR zF-qT%#|WBUQ-Bf(V#W!cyiG*H!y`zUq&XvS-p~O)wsa!YnA@x!g&TZ`W&)_PSb%zQ zs#F2!Jt)k6oAvVWr^D4g@XVQ)u#gvu?RCX2FKj%;eblCypvh!$Uo3Q3}@6e&1L15Y7e0C_kKkG!`*rH$ydo`ABDB7o*bViA)I9~ASnlb#&y zbh_eZq}H?zbm_Wmc76gHQP&pJhrtP8B^?5)Kf-HMT!+%eQUnJ?bO?#NC?+HmHns&3 z5a|$y$JMQiG7`PE&`>YTleN4rePpK!^+m4^9wSWwC(eC6EKR>!iUl@XfuH#MTIuo@;XM1(xKH3$#5@0C?>A}DnJ z*G>=q1iSab9oR`1?E5s-F9U{3Gs4Q39MKto_|OPOuUgboiz>+Z1z{#IWP~RvI{WJ0 z<2ogzC~+lZoPh##DQ{L33F!4>cYo%<8s}lLB`qr;(;KsFK`ufe>UP|U zv!kf>7@)`A-4~I|qY?zx;filc*l>KKv0(!8O{|xrQUM-e1mrCjj}WGl;P9OHam>Hk|gi+m=`F*&6= z$RzNvM7KrM?eIqgr|b{+dvaEnMO{J&1RI;8{+)eGxH6Wm7}HGGUkuUF^2pHP=zG-+ zYs=8sTneSFldk0?u?N7L7t#5;r;BSUY-Toq9N`f}9o8+>Le>>N#$Wcjt$LFI6yL8D8YPMQ*!ge&>+WzTAW4|a5jFaV zOE<|qZN<$&7%4ioH6HT|5yy{EVEN^k@)TnCnWZvX%Tm>gK9C;rv@K8~xvaE2M^Uyc z=SkA~3(%ml*!A2CCat9XDy{!2Ss1p>XcHt?nQNmy`&pyg zro%k<7L*ktLk(y_*NG?^O}$~6V+hpq?|k6*pUtz`0I%CN#i1v=BfdqL_N!vs$h-VT zJMkx>zQLa%JWEKnj1EQsXq&W7!On{uze!N<7r^}JczKUuhd=gLsUM)vIIKaSy{L$L zz&U?wv#NUL5b*uJRd%hhORyw!t#PIf8~W6@-TawK082_DCtPa?fHl(VnvxOe08AaN z0sYi&rT_G?XH#rwc%_})EcfdD+_GBHuj_T(7gyY+2(CR!OXbEtSkFDa2&{qLXft_w zW3ykFJA*|JlR$DB{eI{Ca-XL*6ZOHTdT(hp4Wjs2f3o{azxsQ-3 z=|1vg64ZM16aZXGix}lzM@95T=e8^AU1MO;yYGUYL93_nVu0K95e%a8JE2ndlddaQst0N`L#^w!#>2cm5aR zj|v)J`8-@^KqKVseQ}H&NoS?Rt({?$GufTiGGQk@m2e5nVMx~HT&7ZBO%MxOs&vln2GwQ9qnI4eoy@2=go3y8mWS( zd1Bd}RV@yk$Nm8NnIAlAh88?V zUwwX#K3MwLQ8gE-)XH^B#_sxvuPKL69= z$=?+|JiTv7<3%I?j)49y(8I;_Yo%a>33I#vX=zgoI>tk@21sHM0V>(*_xwdIfpDpP z(Q2Y^rBkeP92Kf*5&rav>wPTYfK7m-$oo5y4UVYIP9zy+$d18wGgN*j!g3jX2btM_ zG+;R}LFBvVO=F@Aj#^`arYZOWa}jAGeDjBJEIf{OH1i+BIh{gQ;-!#+<)aK6(a&OC z?|)QpDhobglI6}S!S7NK(0FeC_g)m3c!bPzg2OPY5J}T60TK~ZQXG5L-lS*IfJWK( zn7wUHZC!*R2s*ZJm>Nm)H#2CyKB|Et^?)2Wib039=`_xA^Q_g;1 zn?oT3GAEvO1*&BOg3laaeEg`ZU7smpf0kZpiB5Ev>p~CEoo_{N?t^^dyO`HCgNA}b z@{Qp_=Y4>JxOb73#ZvLLI^4du6woZs>>$JhP|&vU)fJ^Sa6kyUy-y{OB|K(pwC3Zm zrt%2t)QbPan4n_$p!zNf$h<)2=TLz*b5-Ml5<*eB4E$d-Tm(D=K4PvtKQ}7KXft|Y z;NK`g;VrqsOGwapvPCih;bZI?#dx$nNrN>O!0)}Vs8`ot{?SpHn+q`8EH`7`L)Zjt zGBwsgkSR85r(l)p%n$MVL4J!}cm8djCoDqglde&8N-)XGoGX3X<{_n;V|t>gB&c6G z&t$L9otROeDYVj(PNa<0iW%Av-(#M3gn}P45xq?00y3z!`GDVx=ieOP!0A@56y4ZO zWM4SzS&4Z z{lqVv#V37TK>UAy(aei~DKlFoFr3AL4E#vw4Nw+vpU0r$8USee#XqSbjKGyFw4PKu zhfe~@YsDxqx-Qj6wn=EkKP?R}0xD-JT`z%FL)ZN+?tj zXt8adIq0uKalSltAgCvcX=%REp<4DA0J5A5Bw`VxQqWm9R9t`G( z7`EZ-&u*zbArz;*ps`u(F*!)an=Tb-T+&a~Xy0*s+&~uJbl2KZ=M19nZ%B@OaxAaZ ztIOGm`_SB-#-^em)>PGT(pR#5bh#A4j$_`imu^IxA zdG<@1XIL&CefG%(fxW4a9+1(i6#sESPY-{q zDn+&3y-<_r2mm{AV(ufAHQW818#yS`dp-s=RcgDSVlF~ZS zwVLSYOD}pbGwSeL><;oHh6Cx+scSDKd>n5&vn*j$Uu+-d0=$@TR zsjc~D{@MCEU!1o6Y0(sme;ZHQ^^s{QS2cD7O^N1qNBzSLU|=Y?Htn`@N$()b#ZITa zGVtZkAj)7dSA~$BRPjOm4b+k#M*L9OXAR2q&TPapChh9EX+zdPUjS^MQgXMJ#UCd% zxcc*#+QRSw1P{?rYrXL9GmRhb$PUd)_WAM@cGy1MTra*z88nZJT?Il^zs=LhfA_&V z@7-m~<^XRj5uXCg91||a9`%Usm5g^P*m~STImwu^1zOSMoe-EN3L)Qn3eAHzA7iIuFUbTy>0b6)S|-_4Ai=RZ3x``Hao zC@0l)R}Apdc`fh5-8@O}uNl%IuP?>c!$mu{_J|M#^K|Ux@(8e4WxGPsPIFbx33JnU znhx&R!q%mxDSD3`0Fkk)lY&O2GYT^`n^h%)mtOb-)Ks?rhT3Y+KOHRLjYPW^{wQ7k z#1YIV3;M@=HH{K5D7ey8dZgGR_?gB?%CCm%Q+{cGVOG@_(L_GaBg_pe`0TW*tDVm= z^IRbM-ma!yGpCbSjaqBH^WJ+8=4N7De*~_iWr2D9alXWBe&X51g7y7+s*Pqj_c*X8 zX(tN521}Esa~mMzq|ip+plZf2fHxI)6=PplO>`1R=o9EnlpnW>U3tZ!V@6H&nY(oT zc;c_4m};JDOId7{COX&oNGa0sts22tPaJ`8Y!L#%Z}sqn}m-&5$c>#ECKhwPz9X%2kU`1w8+ZAUdopD z$-P?0n!&0W557c;_f^+f!xmUW1;xg1pRq?@5C3_Jm^lg^LwNlVC^pRVYI99%|x$O!Q_klG1!h z{j28lz+?geT7{6{*8UWEHUr!I?K~hf{%iY_;JBb|g1|-#I%atEMn2n(b#q+`|8zbb%FGj3mBwOX>~PqVQP^?OF%>Fjz3^w?aO z4=qAXc!vH_v?tDFVx(bKWxMu^X7j0*cSeb1Ob8IhUejG&ukoLTHsRy_WBs%!gDbJe*eUggj%tT?SouDE8mkE?;agV@7`!(KGy}oW* zzB2Mpv0J@W8?IAL%E295M)QNI`&*GpRE9skirxmgw@4LKPnJ%soqL}=RN>VMm8L(J z@!JZ23^M?$1xGE(YE2&N1IQwOXzG&Uh^SPcw=%PnLrGIC%34iJ|Dahi>j|J)Rv(K= zvkJ`VUY+7XCQr^7|oD?}28Eo`ilwO=bVB>Smlim5RgYrSVQmdwl`Z_`0 zeAWf6+UZI5cT2$Zdc25CSJTR%`1!&Z^*OcT^xNG#s?7V#qQP=JBjgkI2(U(fRh6f% zUVPk+Wii&ng5V;O8gi4i4W{UiPqcr=CKEO0&O7h@(?8q=G%n-Cep;v6SWV^9=TpD-kVsw4-L=VpHQ7 zxXITs6PveTKSz9hft1R!I7Kp9B9k^f?Brpcw+f2*S^P$(nae6+mFa`EOs>{UwP{~?nTOgzvFm8s)&0*O+$bH;MgIiw}}0nHpJ zH#FO6I1-t=l}0El!WWrRSo&AePrIWrPQjNZ--x-{a_}W(`v@xMU&U>o@2FN0z*t;262+E9w&U!IuJZxy?Ny@d6 zw=#?jz#qC4k9|>+qsxAu9Byzwad)yCnhxNPh`JWc+Xgm1) zuhyprl4xvD_Cul1 zqL0J88%}{x+nusYhZi^J-?epHMj_6oMTP`RzTw%9-=AQhUON?FvU~?55M;;f)b87Q zA1=u8eg1PBzEQASVHa=trTiw={*|v${$q$vq?UF>zh6=g1umqCjPT+B5NRqwr)$jb z8 zbOIcm$qo*p6$Qp^aKa29{oskh&F;zgzz`xi#miar1+wUsaYbYBRDOTG^~+}!Bf6QNUbo4T73SC&purEfDN`3 z$U9*U(hXJVUw`*qv91G@fBQ_3@{lJYhL4-f)XzwROWX zJ~kYq{*1J=S=%~_X6Yvi#CP6(@GhJXu%P^bKI=Y8hRUjdugP&gExOeEs@)Z$Od=N< zl=xLxiXM1AY^Xn8mbB{mUn!+ia_RdM-{02fU;k+FDe&JtHdU{-00_f?h~t>{TVy2y z{sLl6-L-_;Nfwh>oe~k@>ho{+rtQLp+qM|@1?W-YQ*a<0n{yZ$_3Bs77hGT)fm64_ zX@8=7qCM%$qwA`?mcGUxJn>IgdKAmWqh@HUh7s#?zva628Is5^Pkqqq7eDtqu&42g z+CcySYQ)`zP=O%G6HV)ja+J6z0d$Y)l;5IHre$TiaTtmzu4;PWN%Y;eL$!~PV0qUn zf)J4Z24e=!i6|3YY}CzK6Hj?HcI6Cu;igqA>VfMNPhNdh`g3EIMP2Id1c@Tv&b3Xg zam4EF!1cT2j*6Y`;f=A4>mT1J?Hx0Zq33SVgO(ERzOoyH=BPwwz454qP+}b@H!{V- zcbxU+>-w$Fzdm|?Ph|kidFsGFOlZ8z#n757_Ts=ZxG_()*Dz3AzO>H&s2NUi(mMs4 zPPY*U(NF0gr!(}?I!C^`HueSbxPJN4@*%I941G2FvT>_jHytWxIfuC*2np2kS|^4` z4<-4%JnPJ00~@4#qgWc*A1Cekp9d%YKzUj~Cv{Q&?%qjzws`c(-Fc@3mwyGnN_TaV z0RaH#6ox4CU5?CemH2q4cffF{eBPQxOn+o?st=Z&SV^@|l%-Sn#Z-~H_iMUDx+|7a z%__wEC7N7X`$c67l6h*yUPg@LZ({l{spH43d5iq2{R32n@pGT`zhmWrI8hZH1JE>| zr~~0n&YTqq`JE*q*26OIEB`J0wFzaDDZFX%6k>|yqa3mv|0*CewQ?_Gg^y>j9lOcu z=x@p-j@`?8^vUAOct`w^->epoCALU!@L9&B;}D5NX`O&|WyXNUz447*hp00YX|bQp zV8Uc@MY!C5jnj4|g~F)Kf|XgSD3C0K>>os>K>l!#_IRc2}dSh&CVsG$(|@+L(4 z(HHv;W_gc`Zk6RsD%*QLgzR12?$BvsOZ^vZz1kMd;)|j@^|u6?ADF_H<;Xq}k>x;# z2I$>1L_Jg!$2A~{Yfh3l8a)5*tFiLm5A6ksscXjq-Dgiut1!A#STk>Hexr$zyG-#B z<;amCCkDJdIkfQRQ&#=3+9N$>n!LrxIvBuxHwMk7v1=-yk@y@C1-|q+@MqeU&wGD! z;uD#VfVuRc@?tY0PQt;AG#m*Rnk%8NVk1+X{q2!I2(k<+O;KG37z4; zkUvqDC!U(zE00f!v-Howe>0=xf)Au{0oKr|{YdgKdrZ)4(XzmB#}1z0I_Q@O{&0bd zLjYCYNg2fu%2PKe1^onsxFHOCqk-3+wVtXzDI0-Nu$ONzo*hh!5FV-l7LMBDQXtl- zPU5hH{BA{_(^-UNO-g)!3vt+PWvqp}>2KO-T5F_QQrk13N)YRONlscH1hk^J+=yC6^2^kzh{lXdY4kbMX9HJ9%q>lV zGVqyvu<44ZOAy<0`jMs}wagPT|4J|F< zlS}QcPU(?XLgKi~ZDshau$56o5U!|ov^;>^Np;xZaK~TeYBH!x;^giRq_LNL+c0J` zgPb=V0*zd0+2tEQ;dbt+p)8_O`c&p8-lfST63Do36zz zjE(gjcyHRU_g`-6ttvLbgUznew<;=JYdH#PRwq@6LH^9B8LYliRZTtG60)l?+?-00 zL@D@g_Pu@F=FtJMJbu{dYEHiAn+`s08bb%MxcH&_7^2?ABzgjV<_>3lzL5d zUMMd5;>BmVl>n|7)w*#z$zfyxE3N=#&1$IVIKIk?qXWI}{LdonwcU=HSwBK6<%q|p zdEkQ+_z=XqWh^Q{cRiwXcEd_W>e-+YmM9u2n{|&C51!Ddr(Zl>YE!Avjk%F`lJu>R z8k{}Z`u|C)+f~AT5@;*SZqzLbkuW9WA3&eyO8A#8AQ>PQ+~5B6cOCY2Xy#HNwHM!j zt;*9$LO}-=*Yy=4FirtDNd({k*`%bBpGV#~Nr4dzlK$>#(GAi8_s25ZvY|rCwwypL zDhvl9Inw#pSUqJ&);3S9aLZKO-QO+T>@?o>Mp)3M?XibaCNrIatlEL`Jyq~t+COD) zBt6<#IqEwA7pc*kkYFqBZ;RQfM47!;FKE)LI)gvpCPE+5EPfb@jeHC6Wty+Y)wfcW zouDKN7*{`bn-D~UuzQXtb${{E5N^NhJ7s+_o48k>e?2qpNd9OH2Mh!d=x?_>!Gf;q z@l0wU!@Sbtm7sv4EPXm9m_>9$4pa*{yeDd&PRPU-Q0 za~I+Kw{pMZ!qSY@Cu4A4U5#QmmnVqKx`%YoHwBlf_75IwJwsi|wA;~b(1@6<^{J1C z(HA=d+J0OLh-y@Q6yO`>#OB*E7vMWtL*tjGB5Sec`Dn&p?17Z6`x5%~UDQ=q}Xh zV`w%(Yf&?Nhtcw>WN42MemyvYWQ|I3XnxoXn)ypyLmixRAzyU{kJeAh6NWQC<%#yt zq-qG(cUkuGOPKO$CzAh-W}xvD=C|R~L@=uf-z0QYz83t>r$8{t68`%Oo1h$_zgaI5 zEw+G}F*r$q@m906;V4Fl7j^uYcK=;rNcF8o&8SstW zrDqF)RyWs9<&VM!RW7`^mE>~vocp@CCiKc6mc4&Vt}8Bhe@5-4ZlTMSzt&?{YOmPE zu9}s9;k0NrRkQi$A3yl9|Ci5Iy8-|GlUMj^GZ!puwbnkaX-<%0NsWGn48^AkrwDt{ zpW(#8MDn(X1^Y2UiH2CQp#WGwr@wO#0mj4I=0{9V~GHup0z+FrMh_1La(6@MLV<~8npjDQ@c9)GL#i{ z|HQBXVwERdYRbZ2?FEkeox+=iq=H!({4%!0t7i(pb~kShvX{K`>Oh)Y>*Af~Uq8I5 zLP|dT>VKlTW(OX zh)}2-bsuH(IzSzVu6XKF%d)pOJUgUD2F><3E=44Dma`$hg_)rw3xZ3fHgP z0n&s-us(2ZiO@4;Mq%F!!MHW@mHdJGl&I@xJ{EOtW8W}I-g}-wBH2lRkh&}ROL+b# zeYMjR`;Z6z49(1(ui z@}Gn^opfUmY^eFiii#HVq(-fTiNxeSaMz0yN;;^h`9aj?X75>Ek3o*pptu`4a;-kSam$ zNF&0zs5>zq5sQS-GMc0m(Yx^yj?uwHc!uu%(cR*P&bi?;Y_cp>_HI1!D^^?DJ|KbE z*+Lt3gI=(|<*gxe_f=QaWIKNO`)U{jHT3R3`NdT=3~Ngn*cLihOP2q_HJ!s)kuL&+ z>3>*qpt}Y0eIt9&b)aPW#d!YBsBTJvH>xg_1hmtz-OTJ`qZ(&ew@6rn$OYlGPDrKV zX7;hEA;tE<;Mz)cx7ZA`XDjrAUQ3;Jp@m3?xVP^Om8f zW+b^QAMuMFDLuauJkAC$1znZu-z4|wLthaZ)czk;Pmn~!9 zXCYR;!uRW3?dw1R6p#n0Cy%XMOnuC)L?UpZ5cH3EfWrRtbEu*=W;Xu_;r9gf(?ZzR zg$lL*1GWdKuG}F<&$^$`^UY_rjlqt>@>f;Ybk$9Ic#?Sg4GuvGR(Eg@6DMbOze#3* zzxTZs=;ld!Vb`q~BnFXEEMmsZq0@)oWU{dnM1IYnUbbCVZCt0{B^k=IR!HY`{@tg= z3H0$6x1?Gi?EbxYWbr^VasJql|_i^1X5J#Y$OS-7?H69d3!z4Z{GMoqBA;adZ#K4BhkQ{dpUv#ki>UUxoyOUA4 zmk|{B{fO}?nM22(_Wfe7!VU((EO%t+JRAIdoWgC{9iu@;Pm9iz@w>B|a9qi>S z;$b8He1B+Fe`wuRQH|ACkp5nuf9F?+koq9G%P#PJw2w?LV*&!;TYAV5m~oC%Kf0Zq3lvgEIrgT>{PaH{9o z0kHPXInq>#NGM-=86T=!_PC02H;T5E(9GDWI#B^fx*ko*+S}R0?lr{z5ay5At2DqZLm0 zS|=A7%M<9NRL+RqDh8{{B?qV&O}N=W2h@$Pv$*3CtojjboI?(s7&%b|rz6QIMv_?A zQkUp`_nFDGMsfJqCsS&>ova( zjh^7&b;!q@c4wwCv~`>h;v-DH!auC1ZcI8hbBB|OlZ?VfE>ZT=0ir-Fo5JV*{I3YO z%(GwSycO3#)EMym)3{g0;CIbenNjcH@-Hd7@cGyOGW)l>>}TKe%$@bC-uML$nx>dq z_&f%pT}2mK$9~Ta=YM%gKF)FVEp~3GhG{XB>&AVc*Z_!W`2(Y(yCIwGsL?84xWTET z<9B0*3}`_e)kG~xeAZ8UY|BXiUK-Wk$6c~O*mD~FLu!19DRubY6+TS8@88W)9RH9w zu86_nN?r#Ftm;bU=JIN*)oC)`6Bt26qM0dkmwt>$iiu5#$^rN{8lFMN;Xc!ShIWBO zdU(Siv5^q!)9`)!%<_ljkRe#Mtt9j^%Z>@j?(|tN7pl@dI3i>= zFUVJXWqOAdO|=CMkcha{juMw6@}_r?%DXd1=+8skZI0gy_O13}4l8Q%OZ007x=`}T z;~PEy`uShuhq=4U6hp@+Dd`<94+A`mY$a)gLs@H*B={44&8Yk@1P%L_(5gS~4)cG! z7_P%w9CuS4!+Y_y9aj!v)LWEg1&MZ5CDCY0kD9qtnhUM5T!a<2(Rrm`QG7bb=+ReB zgtue7kuY5Hq+`E1K>4hzdMgr4am@4(!E+;pw6FCb_K1%_I6EntqFzRQqWQC3ouyB8 z-t*ime?Xv?b9_XcQ}=}8iH=Ngo``^leN_;j(jroyIXFYCDwB430wJkY+;sw%SSo$3 z7@_LK0s7?!aFE-ar2h}iDk+CKUfJH;M;GLDg0noVKsu|>)puY9{Q8nLa#KdN(OA%l zSmq`3Id$WhPI6F4uP8ka1^H)-ooX+4yPh%ywTt)~5<1nXQ~Dz)@!{dhp83>_G%d&S zb=j^u{BACs(lN!mer>%BA}l>*zh~>=6~4M;V9kNt&FkF4{BR_&QU;^gPwzf>=Vy{< zCr(3HS<)YhMzA!eU=O5KW(X0^kG91h;C<*P{+R=iM1pKe12oJabJxKBhgn+Of+?;~KR1{QY?RKYj3hiW`O#Q!Iaqz8veS zq1{S^vG06d4FI27T=*Ky9}@$uRD`xw2!PR74L(u#Pwn^Mv-uU^&w&4g_fwkaPv5XW z!tMXJ9#0?@h$bw5=Pn}}%Aox z7R)N2TUrW=Buov6^EA#g9HFVALv&zZQUP&5QdU*-Sj-4$OxCQ_lLIwfKbY5)9!q)l z$YUOTQZbtTLvJl<)D4{u*k-+hH=ZH$h&x=ClvyQiy{GF_;W;-99OQx|Z`(oPd{+#o z?L5rE3)x=ihx_|cZQ)xl<{^8Z2Ws!<>q!SG_GpyRtHvdEw*vx>8uXe*tNLbhQ4ol7 z;4%=5VHdm-xE=}Xht3u_`h14{jA7B>BEmj2_9=NqJW1c2Y3P$8-mpj)>J+umcC6g8 zbxT5yk|$(0?NEr+;4SUF&z)cDU6zt`Y1AL#2!A!6|A&xV{)bzyJNInyA;k3>92xIC zShVHPVre6>)bbOfM>$(RdgVxeIJF*H_ehktJ0ik)As z7f2 zn3D3Y>FJ(rxM`kr;GOq=_TX-i#6pwGual?L52LA)Dk49W z^FM(0oML0ydm|6A&@qx}aG21>;{6Z;daJd&aTl5(?A9eZ33?cP0;P<4BGDo3v#w(q zXI7f}(Zy)Jk(B|R5B^dHP}{+7tBYzj57H|hXRpA`!biRPi(fYaJK7T7MA%UX;C!63 z<}~Pfel@lMUR<>8Lr4slKMw}|FCI)-nrs;zkIekb)XtS|Z}65pOO|93rDtm}eM{P~J!oeA zSnbX7J6{yCw28=ydPIqEd}{s&Bq~ot+Lj9W*{SlLjLE3I#;`4dev;^&bZ)&AF7nK* z(kql)G^M)DO&dhP^IyKq&TV`cMu7)K_Dog+Z%{Y=5fYH4&JcCFd>No9Azpv=B$!S$MDX77sGhgU?vrZ@sM<1gh=-4*YNT; z@1?KyXopOaye~DCFQGq1BD6}CzViTyJjlG$;YzXFx%zq`{^QHN^6A}f>@=K1DfuPI z3Wqd4zkg|m3q6E-?->5Wi$H-Eqj~Q^#yaTnQdj5vyA^o{{#b*wYrjLYeH}!t8AN;u zTF}dla90qntM#~nJXvp|Pa{=!gpUo@STy;@i(S!F;}-Azv>1x!4}9XE_@Annv3$OG z*7|a{IvLI4pm#N?5{M?K5RtBj!eCxeunQ6P2rXlv?f4TV-`Th=ijv<6BIFL z1%H$+bq$op;FF#6Z-Gm0r0VV$#YO~$mA4q>wh9C@UWv>Vtw=z>aigizy8vy;UqJ{2Tm7;8rE{i`xv0 z$6ED(p#I=?`T-1eUv)uXlj{%xvu6O{JB76AE)#;&<0hJq%QoJ(HF&RB%OnB#|A617 zFJrNV*g~`(6aP%fDahEQ-YpQ-X#rwZkmkCDL-`ejRn@F~;oQkrs1O9OD@Zu$t&=Ij zUt;HdQd4%`eo0!4qR0P5h0F6B>a!=0?+P(_SJlk!RIxgYclZ9T=uo$7hbWFe4O}xD zQeT~^y&j8Abk*d(liLPsl6Hlje|K;b5&U#yu1}N#C{P)G$UAE(OzL91w{kW4^uoG@PIpnNc94WfVN|}DoXni} z%?y1G>SOT$NdtPCWeL+s6dIaqB;WIdGZ~5W=^X<45 zp_s~lH_9ix4QKa(M7@xd%TpM(k2L-{R6k>}O4tfdIaHvo(>BdsIt$Ug`r$3qa0@Aa zEq1MCngzX~Z_R0o6XRT|pu! zLVv086E>r5k-j+bmC%OmU!Tn;uPAaOzHm!{F4>P!a6vrHk|UFD4!8X%K7yqoX$RMG zJKoMF1!94w`=pbTAVd}8CNq0L>R%!;UbTjCr1qu(rv8MtL zby*3eLmzhR?4+-&6KhFEA%Dd?sGqLIDQm&Fn{=yZWu>LCwSGK>lu0IkG~-vlTL9CQ9uMRo|;$EMeQiVXqWw=Ce*%8iWpH^jgU!ZACCT z#c>xeAboz^O#*8^Cepe+^E_t>xm}!!ErU!rE!BK3F)=x&u%ZC`*IjYXQo$f2{#~uZ zm~8iLz@)0(R4(tWvomDc^O@hK^N7S-u5+=M*9qRrjc2AL%JLAyk8K5o9xW|7Rl6uQ zK6R%O+r$-QCSuF?%(xta!M+^`Hrmqasgh-pJUlGVPvJ_0S1XY;SG58W+K7gWAc{h) zW8&M`W9}S)lM@*|BY2k?iDoL&uA}Qb;Yx*Wqj~V#XjQeuk+4oTd3|^(}d&E@;gE?hWn7VSd-~uSJxe&t`eB9Kc?HpjO zrZd9cTeJ4NGgCx|ct$ANE>g_h!5C;!thSiT4q|R4Lr-GcsxAs%N8Gg{W+BP)1?mqo z#>mbXD4(4;o3~ufffG_cF{A8NANK)#z|NzvXsm}PstE*4E+;=kmtdIwOxn|dLW)dR zyhMYknmESOwNU?YK+$@03RlIXD*%Q!U=SB`zeUvHt!6!$+OGAs$+MwM{=f*YhIqpK3OMpc)kua|KPRR)4dV}^O$Y4ZvH-tO=w#;#b`K~JA;N?l5#5neF zC|L$xU99Zek+Vs32|JT~haEK#uT*>v*b9iJxw9gm$nbA>U`J^^q%T`~R zeMo#s?z%F@aM@+N|G$aa*X%`4Y_L!X;+_YG@ZzLzyAu);xanT_9=-Z(pmR^#F%!Kb z>nO-C$D!D~jaMeFRa`9?;!w-)^`hlf&C0)US~Q!g+5Gd5AN<(=s~`LW!GHhc6~5Zh z(y0%=P%VL34}h-B*goK(+ofPj3DcMlp_1sM#Ih;AV!V({r6vOi#OqLt^{Q^PE@)OP zUpGaorCRfh+pufrUHQ`Vag;3M!Y;jU8{Ij1reqgy|xUj52sn%DFjXdasi zKr|fBnEEnd<#@s;VLkh)Xs)-Ns8RL4%-9W_`iZxXG+f7SxThX$ZaVY8ge(dMQx~fp z_uWnNjN@T`CN;zbxrHN_OTpT8%C?EHw?ml~>VFlBQwWXGILhor_q5cYFqkkBh<^+8 zaLhO44TW^I@#?;UPO(EHtnnXN{_f4`$2^X;l9fhGu;(9E+?s3H!<5+s@$Z33Ort!x z#S@iWuN|?HI8wE>A<*+B?vbxR(N6_a2KwO~L(@HI^p^ulBjKpBQ+*J}$a!2Em%sDN zMTOq?=t=IS)=Z1s1hR@@QiDIAXjvXM2s@-w!fl*8t+5$Ts=#3uWQOp|6E@XG{7{(r zHbs-GOsdKM9{>RV|LncXk{s8SCHgDg8eAjIA|a4^ln9w9V}UFQ)ey-N!LGg|nTLl* z#sNLtgZ>Bs9F_H~$2GleM$@E-qFL9Zdc+yi>O)#za`#$$pNB^#5`YkKl8MqlA~GT} z(*5{3`?>a7#+qDs$WIC6+3EF90^XYTb93=*^u)BY&Cu6#p%m~mWjx))-m&?-OjX9U zIpKvg^)N2`i*G>H76n09Dlm^XV+$Mp1BG@VNOWdQJ2{erXoUY}G1wWRNb{sC_jV_lrW;N_Q+KrW`w-z9mTqB9 z@aORoE$rB?i7%^3x^-sqof3}V+Yq8;G-Y3PI+c<)0Ooe8Y7>7qAZ%3hQx4I!YevA9 z9=Wev*_Oqlx|g`U+m{Q5E?TlRhE{C>_@C8v=piD3lF0kT6i`PCJ5_=2pquUI9y7%+ z7J3^|U}HNiV+!gU`E>Iw!i6`2eByiK}j? z?K!PMG^A;>;o`dKBu6yeSi|mKJ3)0@Dz`mpJ^;C^81+dudd^Ww$9&B)xm=->mp~+e z*8z8r;o$&7NC0_}#_{Buo2)|J03ueF#hh<_`q~5%1|*^t5toviXOgT~nBK%qFn69t`3;RH<@wDz-WraqK?heZ!{;b-dwb@(5B`5LXUpx~O%_|Gl zRDD)fM%Xsat@>W$pws{(m@55Y!9>o}w%W*P^fSSL2L^fjl&J#YE#SC*Vb@QM=buy>DXFQ6+{n=JeHVhZ_3JO zEKT^1g#;yMvNvRZdWtLp=jCPnl;>@1M`M865wnnv?%y7B%}Uwz&9D>YSZH(0iG4+r zf9zcAI@IscQ>~2j9po`7QW}$TpNKx95j9dx?*;vXBNWgM2~Dz?#?b^y2xZp$Wq@n-V z?TjoiBhI@hBlKFsZ@8w+=of~keGSPN*SgU%ymMoDCOwnZHhO?Olu5a-H8&X+!Ru%k zQ%g)Ucxa_oI63F1aE-M%(y_EErv-{#znYOnaj2EFJx7tzY((bY0gND@>-?bHdd)h({c^kP z-AaDv14uT=`j!Bvz4ME=89^x=Ba(%&TF+_$M(?Vo?0rCYStkLQ=dxXujfVx;$*(aB z?3Hg+vUgH34L7*8namq0$EIYi#coseYx9Y3)eE-p3ZrA^j_b;9{F7-ft zmUdwtS3OgArm+^ntIMYeWe0fSol%noHF( zek(Iz^e-=-4Qh5nWiQMg40@&-jscSgXE3-qrW9%~vsAX-R=x?}j1r{Dhn-fr@%mva z6gj_~I(Jho1jXME(|Vmysvl@RdVFvGRYDT0HSu*hjc0PPwAtK2BZe5Y;b=X17L138 z^Q`+jS-i>N;M@zkBu6L#W~Kx&s!fv!xMzpyv_30zbY)S&cctiwII8#N3?9o363=3H zrz))r?K9av*2aJ*#LnZgKhp|YQ)VrkW!cW^h?f22#yiCaC`9P2jW3wJm`C~b@3|@4 za}-!~U>KDZuxE0x5rh=Eh|Bm6@n{@gYe#&On8}OV91j+#L)YKR{Jb4Pt zK$jh0NZRIFfm7cVST@V;u5oMkrreU)V0Ye%rye96&g7@^2i#dC1g;5%k{;fvxbfeo zMYEKlRr{cNEqWjYxN-?-!ejlwYI ze28@f2aOV=+)Eebv`017dm~e>uQsq@c>-FBTNFkeOq#+6qV=;Q4m2=qp7inL<1aWp z)?Ut8l?BFq`di70O3yO|apY6JIKA;s5U+2>W5|gvT|jQ_)Hj5ls`wD`F`1kzBQnYw zM}X@|!?S}^w57CiV0_7h0rR|vbz6{n$M=eY=o9;BUBJS6#+lgGqbmG2eNI8Ft8eD! zG&kpRH>fRv`y^LBcIqk5%Mk9WY%0`9G9Aq}N*FZlcD>tr6o14!2GIUV7fFd34ZRrq`$rFWYyv9L zu<;|V1gDr9@z=m>@9T0hVd8DKV&!KMv`m98jxR76`8Q^GZ%^{{##KT~NU)$tyi?_h zG<}y94pLn@dy}dFyn^)iNt~({6WZeB+#%O=Z~!M9vXF)(#K4sTUAtuiks&lk)yenl z7#e=pFoyP$whl0lbkf}$xr@talA=^I#|g-SmsY3>`F6L;<;%*xxB~FN$g)9O-Y5)ARY+K8@$W~{n>VemN}PAeLMZ6PHm_;gUs8!7 zlkq3yNjLCmGv=!V&lR_9+0JwS{M>hoW#>-a(?`=W6NqRVKJn=*530ZnBuR}|I0Yp` zAiSBSS_hhQAM}Bo2|U6rv6g^))YSDOog)hNjh<%NZ3vE$=P5#S#hU)Q=|-#Pdp=i) z0$pPO)1`Y@r(>wIuOpLe^ouCD)`TG7)T(CAF>>_fhK2Pf*3NyY1s+`=ygOw zh^A~k9Yokm0MZ%?kkqjZCYqx|7@o&m+v!X!$QG0dXc&!TH4zz6YQnBf0#tl%S?a>D{MBj8aWbGjyy{E{xHhVaEvEuhx5z{T^5lLm)pPS3-XwE?T6C2z}1JCD&l`nA%uW?;H5TS58KH%Cr)~}HZ2lfOb zXyN64GqP}1%Gx}cDc<=4$tBU;SIPTcdHer`0hk80RpY7<;Ua?QLzhAYbL=fn5NvGv1P{uzm9KavWTSy|G!eR%7J<+A6AYH zKXrBK9r&9SWWcU|FSaFSZ)?EisS@;)YlvKNjzLL?BBMXw2mEwvp__gH?3NPh3h#8O7qz-Ktg;e3f!TneH94CwZ6b=Tm>D`0#RcSd_hNoeg$D*(z1a z*0q$0MEeXn1N@U)RJ|p`r^v!2ailz?7AV}AS5nTXG}M%xbbsTZ;{JFVSVS?RixTP6 zvcXs2n;QI)N9D!8{jqG-4VL4!8+IF3DF!COjR{mJO}qYq!N9!?qVBa-dOI&#JB2tF5>e7_wjpgZS&8tPLs(ZOG zF;liq+2JhvFKE!~KUeIT6{K^PhERn{86??F>dPOQQuA1x!)IWN^oBN{B3e%p$9xF|2z6e zeVx>dyeY>4mJe$0WJ*T&?)g@A(2~GTS8sqRnYs@(0W047js5+%fBvU`q8M5O zmUQb&lE}zc{u?IyexH7(WVF19G8(}1AQdh9DZGrluHOyCS}y*4(s(mTZ1c?9=Q_Bk z{DkK*A9JCg6}55sR3?T_+rSx3o|m9GKjU69WkalQE9r`B>-a1Cn)!;VO=@v_=$b|R zfaWvefFRIgpG)3`$Q|ZEHThY|r84J{*z#GaOqM^yZqC(D`J=XY_wKvz2Bq9aaU?3o ztl~9Y%MeJXHhtX%LD0+{4%*f7akjil;*ilgm0|;1#|NW971*3>74q;&0YVyCXzivn z1vGuz(Y1IEe?L8*o|;e>zHW3*`DZHrDY_&S;2{_D)+e z`-^8AuoLQKay{hwlqU_`0JScGMp=uf?c-kl*0>1cCbW2Rv5 zlpka9l2Td6z3)VUR@3nG_>=s7Yf>_1UAHKx)otOMf&raynQHx1tN5_=NRm15p{vBR zfDI6#>$Gn1!{+{!m0>SXJ65aOYn0ab#))8p2B5xOBz!YMEQ z_js*F<(p0Vp|zBsEVKb?^s6710AnX@&QJRKTzuVIpMUnj+p?bU{i!ArL6bF$n#D$T zSl6p=l_^(S{L5tg#Ds~z>ALew!tE%|4B+L{0BKi}Tb7j|M1#tUnSi#jSi8P^0*x!+ zX;HGNjs6Fr)8h`M8`LE-+WL>{KNkNlL_r@(o|30CSic%g!Rz1SBk^FrEBh~|U6%U` z^(W0#{Z6oI5lN-K$=YOk|EE8@Tim^S7iGoXk58lSC1E{LBO z#|e6(&O_mHUdwv!qJG{ciazqCV&heL6zdA3ZzpdH9E}B1@`Zm3Htuv4D0CMF1P$e8(zg{l$p%&)?6|)`SM)a4Q6F9*M6N)o-nxZsP8uu~@!sGA zn?qrX2MwBH*5V-iRcYa^_lvcL#?hCQx9LH-*QgxE!GM_>kT`1-U}RprHYu?3_qDg8 zAT!wp7ymL@p>FAFStSJ789O3kT*^muC1L-#$|itY`LB7T~O#m zJIbdfc2Ap*6G~QMtH@mFTBJCoY}TWL0#Bd79Cr!thg`EMUxsJ@lve8{Nj7tIsp=;# z4;NW+FR6D?|^OB1jd+3Uo$$6*>AqIbMjj4k|;$-*`3xhs6*HK~z zSJ{+zGJN^gfBp2q+nFu#`@BrO#H%{U7QPdx)i0ggMIN7~EF#qbw436#)4sRif)=Vb zmg?U)@f8GFYoRTB~`xjLmfZ?a9n6u(T@ zC>c>nRhpDg=;qf+Y!0kV@6FA`E7M}Y*^U*xOyZjJWm`9sTd`T?VE_kP>!#N0;+e-> zX*Dn;=&5r>A7k6KE3aa7+w#*)K*^)PY?RyK?vlh0IICon>6>qD3| zs5cp2Ab)Yp1~mZ25He`W%sjQziiK6f;ZC#Bov19EhOWj=9F-LdeBV%~jK&Fmgf(VQ zrn)##8dcb`OL7P09rLNhCDr4rYq?)<&h zGuB`|9wn)1ZDr0bzLsaw*H=)k>Ejt9wcae*P{m}SR` z1Ib;7z`Um+3{SX%oj*rSr1AG`8c~v=t^$1XU`)@5h-bvN3FYAr=-|Hw+g=MQi&h>y z9t8TASM6Y|*4~jpw5|MVDe++06Qwq1=~J|@WN<7*dD3;jD>1sz=EHh8#8Egw2?Bw_R$>J4NgEvi^M$n3bop+iY%AQp;nbSb;|?kO?XEeE3nz>G55_Y(rlW+Z3uHo!Lz_KwPKzqR(ySug(}3 zZutp*a4<jF}j*lzWNjU z;?=@~C>exwb|mx@dc?yg6gVCGkYAFtRy&%frBd13JEZHTeUL=F+5-<#REZ zg%?hjD2=Ej=UaEl5vh~><$%`wcAtm9$$qfD9#iaNO$R*Jc|T{PzGn~#wL>}=8VZb& zWIi3bQj%30R(4xCgsq-6bD=Su7})f{9&9TV!Ic6nye(-(%85pdMC2|`lk&M&0lF&; zEl#cP{?z2X!($zLx12(v#U=x0T^)nxSeR1689yXqqtzX#qmuVIvlPOg;ZE_0tm#)0 zo9l`rR?s~y2jt>k!gQS$Tr0=Gp#=gtSY;JAKrd&DN&*#Rc zG@%0$`>h*wW`JQ+f8I%W3zk{uwTo*wJa4-aC*Xm|)L404~F2@HG4mSy$j z5ncKm8o1!_`zWeP(Kcx-Q^9_H9UwkwysY^-ou$QlXs++TPojj4y7Hjas{&a>)3|e$ zLlN^CM~mZ!sQHohPvmL93Z*ljbg6RRVsYxi3K9Cc;uUZCG4?5M4Cl3D`|R8!yw&0L zS6JUUEyBI9mliDVm{C|9TU8v_V(A%=9v7sQ+$da z{AQtk`<&>IPuFN#YU9kQk}iu8j2L@=sAKrF(<&KCm@)4cvlkNKXwR`YSPJXxp?~vs}aqJ*Q z;$HFvNZYG?O)fzW*`4AaCMWl=g_NX}>WjiA5W)fm;s70+RU#@&M~s_5-yyeuO6Icg z@oJ1UN`99ZnS-7_Id>2N9tw8w@hf@}^$6VHL@P1QO&b@8fF#dFZFL#R=**d`>9UWl zI59U4v8qeEwRY#$BA*6C_@SJ|cZu8aIW6{z*q^Qq6|P%;7C$G|D5KvrJ@rAEazXbB zEoUvKDU_hemxm)^)1{P`fp;lqb2fOx6u0bsu{<$$nvcf{wyM@RNjK#5v?OG+`M#7( zX<V}o$@z;I_I$zYBy!AWqBLk58 zr+_`hgd7i?rT_S2pvH*CWtP@6$d8#MVfyEFtlq{Z2p&k^S(1FG_~d!An4>I|7E4WF zGw|$cc+0n7MYk8<=;*1wZAF_auRn1|1xt4bMtJ?rjNfivQcvWDRP^jH>|5ZKbuWJ_ z{#bR|MNu{0IL2VpAkRz4e1zniE3(!Wna_G#nkD!TCtM_ zl5g0nsbRjwH}v=S}Q4jC5*U(@KHCOynH80$O-^biPDGlFc>gxq${qBVK+k?23FP-}MWzx(D8 zDO6NWO#jUSbmR<*0hX{(JsHXzTKMk4Q@NUw!Zxewu(o^gperl3RI<~RFz7K&R)OUdi5`J%y&Z^3NX)NRXs4n@TqXTpnf z6+w8=Om;rBl~?33sUzJ=2^K8Yns8{B!t=#4C;C5T0i1H7+8h=e)dM9{m7uKDz_ab{DUqc zKa@ZRyoGupWcetpMB7jbn2bGN+{?=N4H`97bz=$etbd;a1ot9)cr2@z`t~f~KGuUy zd~1d|+jVX=%$UAWX;Dxu&+pD+<~$En1LWRP2L`ZFM%-$v{wHJeJLxJ>lMK!qA=j)+ z9qOJQR25HzIqytIAfZW2@jeh=DD}b<5MiMF9XN@#s?*XeA9%M?h1XN>zspC&)jEZ2K>x{;E3eGzQt%92@4L0iI=;_@yg&J!J`daR zhTPr(wk3(m4r}noz2Rewt^5!g`V`~Se*Q={D|8b2dL-HD3`%7}jtQ$FZeb+6DzwMgw?V=nBSYc%hlEC^+%GZQu z3KMh^efYxpBIM-<(|?fOmbkI9eoCM>x@U2rR%TIym(+j6U-JlnFsx;5cFItq_aOfs zv_7HN0W#el1tP2WdK?7WMzvnHVgvdCUSZ!^pGY%=!D2(ys!`%&lw0{Pw?u6b5Hn&q zad$?8H4qS^_wb~dY2{X5g zP*3IumX2e>lQ|vrpTUC>`(ha$ku`iZK@IbJ6|5iTX_`qn(G)hi)q0fd5zOh}zYFV` zMu1qaTw=ii-zhHsNxhe4Kj^nDE@7d2*4 zNS5-n%ZWV&d^pHOTmmy+1&9t5B$hZ$Ge}ZGG#4kCP+0eorMcj3SwSeacelu~1=WpW ze7dXstVCcUO5B}9K%V}zO$0dzY<+Pt`1P&%3`}i(om$~77B!~*0|V=l<&L&wNID@$ z&UI8#HQnVT{^vGb)7?k)`;J}`(F}z^kLDlPC zzh@Bur#v(LQ?a8wFp7vyFDo{L{U4kisiab+rl;JA2aQ;!HEURQ>VVY%@b)Q4RJ=gS+=l;bFhxVMdNUoT;y9h9b;W?WjhQ-ay4%sc|(LdwgaTdJ+?F@r9pb69MJ&Y zse-v7F??&AeFfJ**-bWbsiR4)pGWlrtVz{)-~hv8_*|dwXc0{wgV?@h8BxOu^M}HY z`8e4vTY^kN#+KqsR$8sx!)W3w{En#!phd9b^NR#KXjo3?p@p2zxiv=dziBEAOjhOK zUmnOKkYgaR!6xX@BSnMt=i@m$FM%P_^ELpuAl3*&jX3xlG=N}@e634zJ1n<6yFO5< zXFLIqx~`$oEbe#h-tCF(c$y_Mc$U+s*Wqk}YT`^aeQ>YU?5~iWj zkc?_Z4LpOF5K$Lef@^cx*6v5$3!Z88dDqM_hGF14B=gkW6=1$(Iu{G;`Z!KNlAAbu z#~1zag2NBeJaa_e}BNT zvhW^0P%ekAU*4jMOft8mC=tmr6cmy0vFy92$WX4xF`Dbk%*Q1GO)4&V1cvU-Q`2Oe z*0cU7n~Qdt0H9hVEz5O{662sJFo*qPbvc1D=W>siSeBGufbKm)J{I<}l{OC>1@^Xr zA-s%+ui}tgDa@=G3z8xs*>&XaxYi26rzVVxp($8}Bx)8TkjJB3FHmzE!|~_rsaUu z%Vjh=!fK>FmT=k?S)9R*caVy5P-@=3=B8!NiA)P&ZR_0C7lsvOdm#-6K{B=-F?+-ClDk#g6xQ{&8`cB%qchKOH$Mx7yOxW z@tySE4~YJBBr{Nd&LV~sv4o*_cG4EX8;}X@_%cjCghf(XOv)$r)+)t{WCe{ZA`v68 z8AIq%oi;$P(u#aY#LeSpiKuKsk<2Bk4YUrez0;lzb_l~gw`Jew+TVJEr>)&xHDDe1 zm40}o>r7GJ{XeH%C_as|U4O%)kGY3{v{tI;uj|`{dC0%!cEAN!1o&*b)*X~jGZk1~ zZg}^&Ghg;ZRB;cZN-uD%0u77H{3z*ob~>T0(9&cM z(K!5#xp)yE8MFD^`0`xZ?)XOGay~3pcjr)4OQsc+hgsvIX|H^m@&e7b;=L3n6W*~E zZJ0QHIVmB!mh%i-T*XhpSg=vSIhch`?+xB8YlVJqp9_0L48!IA#kje6Ca#y0?;ImC z?!TzEaQn{f3(t{_^-!tUrI>aaVF2j($O?r?%_s_$)6kHiaF~$C4tjf-hf+Qh@RzQ| z)xv0RJYSAhqlnn;BaDhaIu4Z&; zDZ^vhGrCqo{Ds;o!*fC2qu1nb<>+NUeak zqyZ;)#N9E2<{EKr#wh5L)_VSFZ83R~Ll!6vh8*ObMR%S%x38PTK-W)nOLOq};_HQ3 z|Fx%pQy0Lq71=qBmQY#Q>RD1?Lv3Mt?&?4`CE(BcjI3VlB~!9I6Hb4MiI8=fh5$w9 zxaKbrea1@H_4S@(uLbGKKsXqR&)NEDihi5}KUWOG16638H(4lW_T(D=i;`5U5I`?d zsgT+Ok{1cTpU&u30HoY9)%Qr%KQk@fA+gV>e$L~t;kqJ=y-DR}veRD9Dqs_Mp-pMr zVxH`^oj^YW1$Bm^8AbEnx5H+EUTm}S7H}TXVYQ*Q){hl4hQ#2HSGdBwH<%G-pCCEw zkg~H5;TP&P;ME7eK+Zh!>GyqEZNN>AKQaK7zLkp^B?inVtIPr{0FRT7^tN^5V=o3R(IwyB!ijCvpM;DO!cr`9Bytge|^sC{s zX5Ht*-)$hzg@HNFf3;)Od%075=4Ml;e@^t#4`hnG#nHZbIr$pJ-Zc$bX}uLHRH5vg z-&?X+syyH7x?B&+^Lp4hHiM8KHslJ&izpCGjWQl9R5i^GcV*5KR-?9DDTY^tnesHQ zkR@79U|uvmz?LwRk|Q0Y$!U5NIDsUD^yZ~TNfK7Nl?0AMK&-pgTb&tHFH@FQaqo~6 zF~Eq$9CEKln4Onv0?uKO!Q`R)`C zp$b4D$*7dQULugK@{s7qWe2&wn(*MgY}VS4(5{_{O8Uv=%H%oy z!yA&h`>2w2`Iis$US=w3`RaWUda5U9)lJIUkY27=9-KvNjD(h~L*E`t^I@&C7z+lx zZ1AgKWA9bbj7P;(dXzC4L{}sjx#Fp%;yxBrEHC~vI_=)pfu|sV|ESqT2{?7j7{GX8 zyZq?$nG~PW$(=kN4d%0(Zs1O@(ACRv!^FG?+Dj0JI8(W0OEzO7+tgPE1gCn?5|gVb zajlBa;+*uvKrDMoXX?oL3iiGBgUuA>sf;YlG}49xrKMrvnLbedP;s$x*etuUU!__I z%nNFZGtso{w!8AYy;6T$1x0-;GL{Y%13)g&v{&f`bd%zuCm-SC&FHU-_CNl4T3scL zGUp0aKSz-{=$8zOg9s$P4`s?*R{#8@zp^P#HL>aRMew2C1X2 z-y_tifFWBu@o83;>Va$b4P0vcSc$HeRc`|hA{mf)IgIC#>+!8=&8)mO?ZTX&SD`T( z^0W~qVTKOkkW_0B;1f1%oEXHZAEX zJb}|8C)*{JDwxFSy!P4&Lm7!teBlmiXr&RPoP0PieOfkvH`m$>^#6ulLE&%lT)l;~ zA>nmgz=H`3P6_((($P(9xf*OeLDn+XJap6&d2>KoCNhg%<}{aGXO`18Ba32kCB1HbU7xxX zNUuxOv+PY8-Xc(+GouiU60ta(1La`6wJfz9(P1>hmtkAy0U|0qqzGlO_bMT#GHoGx zU6ar)K#2FH(XSINzAuXcntjR)| z5$2Czw3RI%VFJE4*$9X+vOOEi-KI0>x*V4q z4oF{tAnC{fDZ4R*vPFfW1n!tNU~J9zj>_KZ60-TmA55h2{Iz^|C3VxUv-s|8&*336 z-hJJlv#;sei)Sm-viNc;>1Up{XBzVRQq8{T`c z@~^$~6T9^A8>5&n`>+2{)zoGGBl&694Zr%)-`ssqzbN@cQ?JMHfxGyZ{K~5CfAu4Y zYW(W>Zaob>ZUQU`QT(kO@De=u}*GyqRscf(}P$ z=r)bhJqvu!+EwaDOwU2L@DORghj{;toTg@UJ8*n+P*&dl&8MFiZ+$Fbt1F8S-nn~s zQT&$w|C`^wd-v|!i{cU9|4rAOH?{oq;isQ3ijVPs^>{$rR>|4uwkF82!g1oi4BzD1 zh#`nj6p5;9S#=7$l!44VW8L$!dh0%D%jT(kOO{9c*1LD#1t~t=`NenR72q2x*Sj_Z zeZTqi(b-Q6oA(Tqe8oF=i{Jd?h7W>>>aB#q+{TaV(J%>kw#*jgkN&J+9J`0OhYbyK zI#O$fw}VPhFE#^>*6PipA}mWI+7U>B)qN7livU2&;R3p@XVH(`j%50FqB-r zCLNx6@Ie}Y{p+?i)xKVN3MWOk)`oTs?=f+sZWX?b&tg|A15@-X;ouA&lRf+3s@nom zPM@?E=hP6>Nx7?)q>U?Z16&*bzrNMIuR4gzagN2ouEfBMq+peDE34S6tk?Hn|Ce9? zm%n<+oAr_=>T{NUlr9>0C*pSyAB$>^3i$7(NO^+@!P0c^u5i84(%qy;*m( z%XT*k&pENeT~t8Ma!VR!x_w8T%!i0nK&Rg;8U-g#5lf)f>a?eb$3l!N)pa*rm1 zk4Wvs;3tZo-nmQXpsznbqo%EO0OgaV#G^y;)`RZR+mIgGLtB{jm(JCykWBXW2%H@| zGQ|vjq^a$|6Qw}fq1$cL{~)=zQ$VXXq6!uG1to^PQN{Z!t`4{~P@z0;x+Uwv-LCx7 zkLdbA{l*H2u7%Ek>Ylw`?dGqs%xj*R=P+6)!!v$%NxaPfA|lNrCeM7d?F_wuy?__L z|F+oIJ^%Gxo`B-Nb&lEcqL7stNAZXw8%}$VchA(*25v;)&;GB(w%evz@9XrT*idRGq{*)&n@rD~B>EP?Trqm8E6xN+0=OlQKn zRs6T)&fpJn#ABCJaV|OhMv;u4KpzL0ea2k=V-*nlOl*?eyCPLGDcwna{m$Dt$3JTp zQ26%;rTWscOYI*Q@>Ohw0gIyVp$b#E;@!JHy_;oK2A38lu!UVaX#^Nt%w#=SYjUW- zgi?=b%fD(SOPN(&b-*vPwlx~5MNs@WtkV6}K;J;JX)(R!l)fd?)W-ara^Vbq+K`?- zscmFJ9@j`_eT1NJV{r(>7D$-yzk{LO)cscSnQ~+=sTG^a!QFN5&O7Wk{&U2*wW3qB zG^?ZYgCcH5==W4&QPq@}u94dYtfi-r&cX^r2zQci7)Zc}5;d^^IJSNOUlAP_&rspL zcvg(1>SwA$(_l%%D0%`1jI=|f^eO6RCf~h?#5r|(?=dLF0{oKX{iW*L#}6g3TKE)u z@~YLDew5gyFW8WcVqMbNd5 zEq8;{Q4eW-d7(S2t@4>>URgPoI+}YJ&B|G5SHt4qRmr25eT_YG@M-xctS7ZgIR48? z&Yl4TDs5CCxkZrhPfkoTa*aNMhJnljVq=fN(RS(DY-2wjzUU{owO$_~QmIz9=hd{2 zo-`lbf_gFz&!Dd+zv@;8Bq=!-NutL#l$J4&M)Ct9;!WshhO!U-p%(#^U3Uu=T}GDW$>`T?wT#oy^7nJTwxFU33BL!8sy%&guQ`=J);0ZL<}sE?72` zO4i=SjKpg}u1Em)j-#*h{EJyA&6%;nG$~8-A;wTiz6L$$gDT=Noj47H>@7MH1pI0X z3up>+>(`3s9oKqPliQOwc0#x>nc%c7rbevU4!lhm)GrO*EdQ31xq&X)v_0|zTX;^( zM71%2SGqQ3yI6rb6lpVH?L&l6%ruVyVz$`N;ijzNNw-k?>UsL4;)Df3PyED_j@8EiN>-GNov=Rf)Mj%~hpdctxX z6KCHlK^Znnod5P|p(@vQ^b;C2K<2*xc2>VZUBkzEtR4Wo??d*!E&}D!4Y?VgY;ga{ z-jjp2oI*rTOcon&;$md1z8=@|XkIw$FL~G-Ba=l{T-adM~s_dn8^|WFh ztIUV3Lrq;gUt8+b2Y@O}gV3U?*Xx?$+wDnDJ|IK$3W&Vn44Co;X(dCs6O;2@Bg&ah zyV*2Gv`?4D+q`}>$ShXwJobX&v016n`$4-(&f^Qx=Krjvn~&15{ zFpw!3#`#S>!;@L#=G1H)vyjX3WIb9J-;H%tuF7(|hTF3NdewTH$n|&e%;U|OkR&=2 zp@luLr15fl@%49{Ye}6sqK;*lM!=CBCU9G89s2=q9TZK9cZh1*Rmlb>D04hbsTc6U<8fiqRFazT7<3qKUAnDdPfvfuGVJ&V*54bbU51)U zH$fZY#zIVGzVUtqkLC(1&k_HdH5Dfw#(QwpO;eLqr}y`6pG{6Y_l=^jyfxn7Nchn2 zvXtKQ-)<6Yp%c_Kf!nL2>KLOjar14S-os67Y-7hxbSn--&?5>l8&WC%Dg>HGPd9A* zjHabCBs!OwcEX3~kcfNmV(#C6eXU=3{dHkC22wAodUW*CQ9{j)bN~=7<@YNG*LJrj zX7*G}sKziFl#h)O9^0IW58P+18qyg<#aNzdjrP^!asczUtNxCd)F3S2I zTy*hle7X%~f*Xq}$t&ERqg>pu!ONWbuf@j8hDDPkr6=5zU+Zg3N{&!y=`RU|MRocE zD&o2J;^nVI?Soa?rk^lp^y~2E;mE3r&=D6T31UyP{vZE5?PtHFydIv`mz)!{ zv9&P*FH%WptKUa1JwOq5^|Zgie1Jn}yo+9kI+77E+;N9dmm{VNulneIeQVAs#~~B} zjXAZN_`Fe-f&;fTYdh;&mK(*bn*?qoPkG>2bd8aH1XI3o?`i^_&eHPJ4cX^YxoGyK z!4cgrwb_P&jc>*}YNAl{6r+h-{TFyP;*?)hafG?EKDSbps!(rD>6nO#kx*n;lAt3{ zjsujdNm9~{K7`$SdJ}RP2dS)6pN$OR$-^6qL|7gwU!-x9qeA2=x43fHwSFQFi(;d4 z2KSTX&R)&!=2oq1_fs?IsBqIv{moa{ehAA#@|8Rd zy05vWSWqE)lWx&8c`VVvK+SRQ?ih*cv5xO?Z5H)kT4kr%fD*hlE)>=8L040ig&(Py zO8^>63_YDUuO_Im!bi|od+d`+XCCCrHC0AFpyskN|`w^uLGWMMLrc5sCW;k znZml~#5=2C&m}_6EZN|_!iy#t>D8ftk50c8*nc&+wLI6v0S{#|f4Lxye{Eb=n8FPw zBJyhwI_7;=mHo1_!+1Dtym=}S%|s&<*|HWGaO~uqRoolt0}E0a@^xZd<`Ni-knh{8 zTSOorh|Kn!DSeTIk6_zR zgnd@g|Cl$u^26)CMto);Mwo^F)1I0C1=&Ut(~b|Otu^-1{GVKuP-5%?6KP3~*wzwn8 z_eE%w8R@F)#mbOr4XjCEcWoa}=aWWnp`c?k+Ihm)Th$JD|D8Ltb4DSmS$dANjOngAOmBcV#|}ZHRJDjsbnyoCx!v-G?(EnT)|+ z;F%2kpt?JK^ekZkO>L$FBGF5vSV|b0Jtc?#Vd+MtYVxEq+7`Zlh>`{V$+*&WJ3~rN z{!W@mM517TPG@jhRttGh7uq~L{Ptzp_tv?dBwUgdB=^C9q;)mc2gn$?#hxu0PbsO^ z53ZC$&FRoHj#b_$kF4X!;>*eB_w4m|4wY5>lhat##A+o1JePCxK(cxi;K~5s2)A|{M%r2H2>a)77 z5M8p3V;nrT;7YYl`4-j|u7(z!>i9pb1D%{a^MgT>c2b{sBUQY#BcD|2mHE5d?qoA? zhDfPW^#^(I(|Vn2>A->a!QqdoQhq&^RWF$TzB!O z(W%xgP|Q7ps3m<9g}En<_sBFz;h4|>Kzgm^6aC2mvFC5gN>CD{>aJSu-w zD@lR*sH^6J8Zulu1hv@~Geq7O&rq5yC1cY3zUEz1$Z@g(5syx=xAJa68(RF^ermho zVL76h3V=m}U|+&$WwlFyB-KW8R>`3MSMip9JZt!=*cvbBi8{>VlKG#ie`py!Pxg!; z^*u=DF*}kJsPib3Dj@L`ZJlk`&7Awn6utVSQ9mzRWs8NBg_)rnHClU>L6K)>rke3w z_PEGUM-pBr5gChhNq{+Y)7BBEG?z)aWr@g7?i3#+WqUQJ>9lXoB*e<05>L9&-5%s5 zyPm7h+E}&?ufrG zy1mvsCynuCIp1YvM;%Dp@g^?R;#fJ|?gF8Tml9QV+XtLG@ zAVwa6jeoN)*5vBu>Y*Yrr2=km(gdw$_N;B zp~UB$p_XWs>O5=tIqc|6lnpPGX7kPW=%j+>*Jl@BpHUz$+kzcl)yl2cVoQ+anu1)v zAX3sNAhMY2hWatSvyrWq>&&Fr@B3qFknO<9-=#RjJc|b|Hv3| zsVz$RTvsNG*y61Cp%q$rqJ1Q@6Js{VdhiX}h_ySHjoxQ<0<6poaRn5h}>xyL6jc^!4*yowkVh}>G z6Pfmhq(K@c9^82w97lHu(^|AUI|;?_(Z(4^bSLP3g5Ng{^6GVUu$CJm*^vkZo7wUnV{2m=Yd* z%jtI+Vb!xdPwN`glfOi$BViy<#hSse&VJ}^yy~v_ZC$Qhd;YFoWjk&4L$293{v+>% z_a3Zful+dvg%>~g0hd(^(s-OS#r|-P;hj;G&?596}=NIq2_cyk__B9{zI`m6^Jbz^A za{uhkFL>S_VMYR#VD^*ZNTnaa>YB3G(|YOn&e?S4!alEcH2>nIJc$wh(CQJ}@_Z`> zi`h)yRgD`%E$hGk_Xq#?|NPHla2MZHTDibjXq@s{1Gl_}_s3CH-Llf?X`b%t{!B*$ z{fVc+MV3+dhESN*R2|P^CYOOfCHZoBZr0KDoHC?P35Nh!EcQG?{&Xem2n$c`-E_w5 ztx5(xYTeuh4UKu(;L`ccv)yu)F=0C%W=V@8%mtN@GV<`vr+m9fBWiih-FaW`Hp&3( zYn~X<8MSUVugMyZnfCn*u!1>&vvQA(t>SUXm+D8B<)Ff&&Srt-&nrX@IvgYOkUoXFc!qgu6~y)Ws0--F*@4iH85NJ# z3g-?`P1s%OAGk;ZK|G-zOK;*OV z!+rxdbl zuz2x5$BpZDt~Sjg!=b@BJaXrV42N1L8Js#^5CC!-l$mYy|V`hi=&Ka@o5>H11l8DdbBIulaR0^p8~q$tFxv)Th|~IA9nIJ81lvY zJ`VGEt+iR&FkOYu%O>&GXdu0VUEsECznn_U0!QBN^y)`RBrg7hn9MWsgVaR=)XpHz zG!R(K`&pmQb84t>rtxMnW%%F6*|@;~a9@we9q+!5-QAbrsA)}N49MKZm< z;3N5f%AmB1_dAG+$-A{D$(0yRm?^|v3IoGlrD+1(sl4yTVWMxQd z4a^)`Oa$t25Q{pB&!&a{efboLSMh;tW#;&G@mo06-*uEp-(Y@_wU|-^HF0bufgK)G zAx^s#Z&{CiT9)7m@cDqY%e*EE13_BV6JX>zXU~!TxiK+@rd)R7L^#s2?8PQF2~j#L zQfdu6O~oOgCRZPGC=x-D!EYWPk;q<=YrOyIg9Xw@aSbD^L|~fZAgb()%<16@@#Y>y zCGhp<@in@&2Nc}S#_``K;MclS8aHfIAN^qV^#;`rYub`USON!tz8rvI$F6j$HeqI>ZqOH0zX; zHOvPMsL|G37{j?88?OFCV%9ufy-RGzrtFn{r})^oN+bgctc;vq?nj3#?H%BBh%Znh zWO%%FB8A-$dZ5$Hp;jgD5X0wbtx8RFEWNC&P2FSmku{1&?OcHavewQ4Y49wiH0Uba z9z@OSv+<0R(l+q3M^ljFW0+u82Cd4qU&eIz&(yD6gsxqaa?iUQIY_8=lCIa09vBrqrC(eE0->iG0IC zWt08B$ETy385%gHgn-z$MkchsMX~=Uz32AAQo)K$etgVc7k4Issg}^0a}9E!E*0D{ zzOXX*yN`ry!8I+i&*m#apzRx^>WsF@&R<(99jdR(%!%l-Bp~PrC0`8} zUbWzRgti-|2O+yTByCTI2J z)6~~VRmAkg+gmMa_^A?QOrcBt;YCTg3KNGSxZ0B@b`6%;Y7=t|0U4~eyRO&LuptUG z!3T7T!|2Lz4W9}`z}J>kj=d}8nb_Dg^Uhb;A+LYb%D#G`e8~}$f{b_ea?&if^WIWO zVII48U+LGKF%Ym1ctEmlO&%nmoDtrTI9f@MY@WH?X^dp18{&q?D;N0~Oo9$jh# zkQPgh=XFAsM@3=}ew^Ot=W->kkK-8TqAilF+$w+rUV3}|{{R30|Nrd0OOqVOl_vUE z;?9b&8-+`v#qJSg0~u7L*zAS~j41Xzc9D^hSph~yB;%2)>J@Evz1C`WytB9$kjzH2 zXuD=(oE6IEkLZ_N|GsmMyGK?5AjC{B6u^Z{L{(O1WQ6M{Rs9Z*A-!6%9nvL3~>h1MLNw$pOC1hRz*n zky!NS@uHiaF`i`I818&2J~eQ?n8X^TVoK^Bwf;kqPKKWzY@RB#A3|L|y;1YS)OAVK zuIe^A-pV5nW3)h+VPQE;O-JEoqRLhb>5LvKpOf+h(QGzrM2^>;LGsVJ%%Z$col#2q zs5i{F24a8`e`qu!{==LMb~2CfAlmmJr+!JVh7m~VR3H=(qRnxNIKzu`8`BAQ^DsWZ z=%DBc9GzFQIzpn3ZQPU2lCq+aQ+0JEO#K0pY$+@Jz`@wnI~hrML(u7!+9ijXiC?tk zSr65uWZybZ^vw$7#pbP)3yTiE#VMKYD!+!^f?YwyhUlT6RNwF-_RuH~*?rJs~8Lj&Y12^!w zzvJ2@D~4*`f=M3)^Ddg~A`?!CX&@BV8=tA{30J<&=igTW;E#3!G|mnCr<2rC7_uxN z>SYjaE{j(n9j*g?bb>Ms%?MY4VCaEc{?X5W_Ayy~@+v|*uHY*AYSmmmW7iW7$vmD( zK-~71&xVur1QWhITh(h^fjLs{YB6PnT(26o@)-~I`M{MyaU3i+WA7muTeBS9vi^ zwO0BY@H;vGHxgekn?}Gf0}1 zYiXkOYkb*Em00Iqo7xL!sWyhX4E*4`{o?@^>SD%=QR!WD=UtN5c@1q(cL%(uV%8aP z5K}Y7n1Ls}Lt^b$tMA6B33h}Lb8_C%}P_yUFFYU;o>ey`$eUNjk+i|9#FSR19 zGgecc7O07q&|C~#OO2bXa7S6~;zlEM^n%%1xAC$Q>YZNAo$iDPWMk)?wryY}$hZKj z*447u;rEZuVwpj{MY+xuqlxG`$Nq92H-LuBRE>#zBaZ#GN)ly|MwvKzDo2cCe=~Qo zO`9Q7S|8#br`vW7Fn$H>EYoBW9-7N>?*NI0)~e^D-U)5# zDBZ$3Eg)l|4HTZs?wkfBPb&rHDB75#@Ee1mt4nb+&yWauF1zX+JXQ4hB-O@!HBW

Z9mFZj+*?r(d7p#`=n3PtX(&ZdoE-t~>!Q5~V!>fd#AqQ;(SfX-20blOyl z!X>}_qUp+gom1^03ZvCr)FTDPSvuJ&7>A8yvca!z;z)_;ktjG0rm%V;gNlHqmy-?` zAyO_<`r;?)oZnu$({AW^^MZFbdjn?Wji4KYK=sk#EHA%3ZFliX$lGC0t~4U&N6kAQ z`9ue{<}NwXu2_I1i;y2n*dKoq{@6?YaVO}@Z-d%WA8a@#t1xRh z8q;-;-AduZrV?Xzdn*(>RU=IS;}Xx_LlPSKTf}Vl!P9sJ(g7CK)b|t?L7skvDz%+d zl`&GSb|;7jo+GyNfazVv6?9AXb#?b9TF4Qp0gNDy^`e>owBt0;ogS^X)#G4MWp|B^ zp2q&vMxXD>y_&%J3+C5>L!(m{g358vW1+qfn~S(kML zI@zLO(iSc;8|OFAWn*o3vS6CjxID`3_6ojkk}ux-8Qt}e8%^+-J*%fphMEH@mq=XM zhCt#Z_jee(@@vQ~oLww>CUwvtX}ax}w-68f^x^Lw;m@B`?!Z~Nr9vcRe31$SnJqwf z+fWikXkszBuqk*Hqhkqkw+%% zU;j?Q@#R@@`QLSUh1EvG)?i1f&4bNCf=j?->>;A}jTa&td)A}US#33ly)o^yuw}Wds6E5NN?h9&NkuJtL3&(S44tR~@zB4UeGb#~ zri#?3<0FJs(m+vAO@=pht1>;BB%8?a-r`qHRUzj!^mJX)8>y$RQGboI&W$a(eRV}x zeDBFCQbT65eT9&L?oFvHBlQ(;cxm?9v0#fet#%dVc1D+UfiJVV*4tmy-2tZAjG2XK4g8BRrnoD|MS7;X=|A zd{w*Qp5TT>FMFVN`40bfDbiA1zo`0{jOGLHY^pu?v_`8%$Y25yEzw)>?#+uUuGhz} zO0N6a(dM&n{&_!DGe1=`KUFg~P|dt*!~ayV{8X{LI~B_hUFknnB|lXqM_5)rRUSW8 z9zRtcZ)N3i{RHc$a^$CS--E^6Fyl?Yc8k_Z{_i z{II(9y}K=MT%x~scj!lSBW~(my^~H8?|HxFsB8R6Gbafk>NpLf{ zw_Scq1rW*ydQvADz7mE-E~;T{-omE$=-O(pP!6bQywV!&ZB|NHQCwMD*A%im!8G03 zA%qpW>}n6nI_N@>8_g@gQ_N}ZMb@b)Pp~*S?i!Vh*tgV^EK&E3|Dii8Q1&jSevRa_ z=q|q>k$L|O|K;i4?q;}DJ%`!KX*dY6`U;=>7mHf zq*zmgi{ON#w@^%1rY)_H0;iZrTP46r5{V(k_=)93TWq|nFGU_9W@aO?AH0lyyi~}x zYc5zo)GF~}b~&l+#>%sTh1uo5Hv5uu;=ZbQB)6(4EiTsUD7(3k`f4=|mFc=m*JNs~ z8KPFuep_g4_Du#6*p{yhA$dF>;E-gS7s0k$6b)}rwEF}-j8Yq(=g9Amx!bP4hP|ZJ zx~E58+^@0QaZh$RmFe779u=nN62_aD>4~cQ%o&gJ&#EZO?h>^NtC9t=zDMN>K6?{% z1h;3BO)OPmYpQ5v@FnY|H+=vL;zw%n?>JEwaaAJ)r;@`k6ROwW5^5o9&X9a z%sXhBTf)*rZ>n4 z{qpp&jCDWyNcu*6*H(=MfvxFk7^t{w!x?y1Oo|(ew(fnA@N!q+zTbugjZ1{}F!oGbFRYT+~YAvIeJbRO~B@CziXb*kc24alSezxP0ktlp@t zp*#ao*Bd54n>4opns0(H;|fEci5)n%ilk2QMQ0__g47%wPFzM*Ap{Q7uvMoRw_H~4 z?>p@#@fNr|OZ!Q>kmPX!Bo}NK47@XJaYzJtuwpS(US1w@wnK!(#^h?v>4{+mFu8XJ zQaTZ_pt5A5h0!fbj~ z%M{O>HbR4qIm{bQ=a`pvF+MB%w(H_{VcjiEeSt>y>1IZNgfE{+sT)$ zsNg6m5TB^XByNif_qA58aAqQ{Z4VrxySk9mwq**hFRAkRyK^GqsuA}~3?kW+(!-z! z&6kjVz86?&xmuv?87= z95n~u(x1+w^fJ)Um~2xqvOZfQP8DVyFu0w9o(^i-qMR6|n!>ELP2SjT78kT^#)$pe2+WU9 zRK&E8n!t{Iy&W%(3_QAV@A-5#*j__(FRM$`jhglB+pb?1Z7Lkuaa(@0w{=O)5(6dW zjW&gLkxE(zFqL$_N>)g{+85>B@^){Ki-L*J5dR8ptwJx3JXX1$d6(u}AN}hQ=8f_V z9$>|E{*HVtkHM9kc^9?pX2r=n@^zW67xE<0Ja&0!HKT^UBj59%JMfj(Xj%^%e?4WJ z2}{v5m(LPmEY#|@Fnr(M^e57o|M!p*AkgndbC9I&)wwrj1=tatx=Nvr$nxv$8Ii^C zno2^dk^*TUMD#?mk|C9C`)jQ)50XSLrWO$(KvmwA@215k$1emJ1+|MbSys9RZDoGp zo_8Zf(Y9(rl|L5-$pzK30rTnx1YrO?K*PThmAIcb;A#{cAZs(h-5zrbs;2S8+n#T> zm=+QIThX}K7*p2{pa*~+o^}&xd;j%psFAoJHn1Q&YQpXf6`RuMzxwILse} zw`iorGJF|XIqB^4lu34S`Q6F#=5ge&c^F4_tqERsl~{d6ygMu3lbYFzf)X2{Di|w76ZHZp`0|*mS7rU$QR>T9T-eia%Cl?u>4KE@vaj zNgP|DwbgU%A}S8^`PJLlAAj(;&rOa@TGwE#iGH9C@`>H@){E8`=M0l}n{a5uNXz)Q zuPNDnd{hGVdbsNSNQ8mrd$Ar}nxOQ!wSZxRx+^LOdFHOUZg-ueR~}~<@Zk_^<2X=2 zt@|uDDVd*6?z@%M9#ln7?vk_t<#Hw5n0iq+-n2e=z=&UBurjkcTB#9E(9;zDw6Ir#X zoE^5lDJT_=Sr$SoMkr$gz!si)~X8zyb2o=3c~SwJW9CTb%mA)ei2Jj85P82D)O{+g9pIW zo8sFZZrXZbMXKWe5rM~D6Du!mt9}VC<6diG56#7+2pwSV73ol7&s*lqA1r#eQ1uV3 zr(F7m==Q8`x}n>ixm|Sk(cSDJwo*%8ozd3WEs!B79&OS)^9qV>g zHJ}}Wl`}!0s7OS4zr$TP$*Iw)tfR`1EYXp)qXDSbZi=Da1vd)F`4FxEhU^L>#x2$r z0xAiWb^sl><659u9fQ4>=%}aBjC^gM=s+?zAqm(_5R`Y1ZBw`P<}lLWZ^PI09a#lD z_u#}1GE*$3Wlf@m{L@uE_MfV8#~DSUe#k>mKQw0_-=O6Cv1e5&J9Xm%;wbR_JrW-P zok&oEVRk_0%ik)#RywW6U>Mw*bmbKDz+&BY$QW5+skkEVBstkcs4Es-6r6A>MNmr7 zp7V1v`+c$n(IPb0di)=Odib(X(1t`wZ_L8L}cwK zK{UmJ+#M?4k0*5#${5p|u0e3P0YED*5ye#3r;(wgMz~i8kjf;`oJHKq1;nOGKyqOzCy%c;ZkG`t zRSBDLaqx#k4SG#gA9>oLe1Ln&r>6F|yg{)(bOPMfp%5lDQ>oR1=kBmqyA#_OK0hya zwwyGuB${~WB^vV||6erjKhenuIS74yHUPHQR2$RZc*dOU#=>VYbMO*GNl~x4U)tAp zj|;{*GzE$zlm!G-wRP`x3ZkiL!jM-{6~rrrdIe$jFt8D&BO*U^_pC35Lys0BDVe2p z9M}kA=Vu5)2SwAcA_sEILgk}2OVK#pe8oiSJ>Q6cgL*ZF|P85Mdd z)1|zAhcR9$b8JaKw5cg2iW_C^B827I)Zvzln^VW? z9CvxRRrJV5UTZ<67u=U?)IMR`bakat6#7i&id>XSjylz--;v?-SlSmP$$Pl{SB9CsKJoHqpHjE|w^jEH2zuX*j*z zxOx;olbYJFY&9;5p`03Vj8J-tw(yQS0x?0$>I%milF>!KKyA*;#9@5m_IgjGs{hyF z*W@i~c0ckagI?zlmVyN>#GuX+v}Yv!F~P-UFwIh|N>6^MTEJvs^hv2LH%u8tPADCl^^v%!weT_1^^u$f>kj&<60mbS4TlhIIF zPJ-pIa#3~I=Pn9%NHo4tUu&7`Z-Vy8;L;;nHW^v8bHzxSi9O$R+LeNt@&G-H^@6>r?1MrRu@ijZWYD;i- zvF%Wu)+}oj{zpJXJ(L~$zh;!&AW5OuwHah+F3YFM0_kSch#8Y=^b-St#JOPOi4Y#@ zc4M@WfRU;MaYgZLlX{!2tflQHUiy0*d}dwz8%|emZrxZj_hxSZ70NNNl07y|qSLga zYb%W4T?)KbDyfg9H+0Lw6hneH<_2YSv5KRkFeDq!Xn7TVDk3)p-!HPG8!HTCjT$I| zIoHi&*?;^On-P_*W&@tX;Gyrrm)y@)uexVO6wx$`_SGsuhso4c^&-s!TwXpK2$>Eb z09UwlA_2&Zao_b!$>Z#E22Y0TywTFPu~3(}xVDqr`^Fl0Fs3}*#Py9^c`^@9xQr;F zDfO&$#=V>{Mq89KbY+PsIU8YCn#M!1?k}IM1%aQiao`1pgWjWdI(U(p?SS_-?SxtV z8S?QB@6HS-r$r$uH303k0XQ#->1Nzy#Kc~Hho`;f{J0l`8HiH0L-6d2q=)*6&g$JT zp4|KJqn}B&>>p3tiea2!Q%-x3EnE!xO^2!ttFKiInqX~RL6mK9KAI4^cm8MrqtZ9+ z*ArQmVnN6F71)?Dy95Q|KXya6(?Sz9w>U>{>NbeYDrYXgrr6Z)@%VQSzu;*i2HN|6 zJY(Sv>(Ew>;%eb)W)!}D47o%(jVW<2usipy$j@!1qkH*mS^38LoHH5#$$ZCj;w-P0 z-n_wabyVPs`qyycqQmpn`(8-gy z_a#?Q2D;Lr^E1ByieR9kXiz1L+x!YvBK%AnlpYj>W9q$4xIPtsdYt^ZVe^jet6dgl zr^_0ro%yyW8bIRYsv6P&&S3giw?S-KL2#pDi-2~mIiJ#*bcD29M)Dp(Q9Wds$WujN zUujmms-*$IlzllZ73{#Bg+#R46r9V622jEfBc9fZT8Q0@XQ06p&n5fdi^rdSeuv3D zZ5LurHSWC{%;G1X6kof_?Sp$C-n(}v7lKSQP{%#~?C<_gM466GWK%NGQ{2Flbbt{XA)-iLrD z(F)h5OzsF9yR!3i2t3br*^4-%lo-#}&2@Pik~0tZq7+P{$$8|xXLIkn+2fvrA|cEV zGx?OZqHh=S`9Xeq2K03A31#kxom`;H1DKFM?mz?_`3sjCa?szHt|t-?u~HSyAr6Jz z-|ETVRC*=Z(zpsc1)b&BYJ3c)#8HG7DcMZQ+Fb!>pJt!^DizBxh_PO!pb8}WJ3N=w zsxIm4CQ*jFoMnk6Bh_rv<078A@*AtTp(vmH+j1=YC|RVE*`LcT(U+63%7n)NC?4YWL@)hgQL!^Se$fpYl`%!4?mN+Maeugb`6fPbQ@8SSDUT6^RTh# zRwZ-`f^$zKcy9jg`#45-_Y3zFC3G05aR`O?(K{OPCGY8d#Bn+}DaL^)*(f3`VBhqK zeb%JBLKC&^F5uIw9nuY&e=brr2J=(CkDc#F7r*t&>QRdU^q!5u3X)|1SWUm}p1L@h zXAe(*_c*tHHU*;_rRupyJZ%_jMGy#8R!U{F>o0zv(k~Mobo|_N4#AlkWW`LI^2VUp zSIXJ=LYt{R;l@g{cfM-ssIxIEHxF!9&Sgc{clz5^R$V%6`;m zk=hwVQUE5gHN_#&L*mH>xST)O3Kv~$ut{>GHrnXg`kni~64D)Bx9Gc+MWUueyZXqV z`HEBbK!g4_#c5ob>IG_SAg_~~c9PbnLl_OXj1KT&ZH0M&bsp)4laiJDF=!O8Rkx9Fl?wtRG`N2amc zs^R!q(Qhzp_+iBKBkjAg8#WOu^~S;uMv9<%^ogEUT6JZ~LEgFV1=*5>J1kdWB9TpA zbCV;X5v>C2AyUt$sLxeVi$7HU<_$%qT^&%#^UC{(_?fpc1$`+@#kb}o_Pf@h!&GCC zkhWQW{e{vFipL$NTBcft265(AV;=!1hwPULV(E21d(E==6kX}8o9g_g?`9^Z(#@Xg zClp)y%V)|O(H0cj{K1PU4?-I_Y6o-(Bq7`zh8(NVKx-$UajxhDRp(nYgL?rjisSt& z0EO}Mp=mukip50S;~OnH)5R9_F@*4pjf^X;#Ji`JF7{GHpnl2WqHRE2J0h$0Sk3(B z@_AEG;Ahy&`>DKImrm0omclyl!LWG zT@#K*qh7Z$^EcbeKLXw=3{vT6mf@gE=ilSS0$iwFG#wui5y->PO(XxiEC6CgO{RQO zyLdk7EzD6b|2x`qwj+Ym8daexYNt~+e)+P!&K(t|XIJ)q?0$Chebv`W0Unt(I>eI( znN}t(17p#ezV8Gti;jtlcLeUB{k;N^nhPkL?g{&OEt#KT}uXX-b-sFc=~TW{VIA-0{on_@%IX%8R)`&3b)+;>_j zltO=HFdP90D9tGJ1nAdJ6k`RO0vRwQ0t^NsBhgvM^IChC73ZUaSJr@P% z2uq;`e<5^4RRJ&7+Lw{6&dsYnO~>o>xcnbf4}X z(H|y@L^o)hUbkg|VS|x*qeERWOj_mmf5$$fku$A3bxkx?a5tf;fDBCF2f`z$-V>en z2fqWt9zr!azWJt(kUP2LE`&BQN%dMZgHARBdl$>nl@72=Re1o}V;Up($-a2G8S_Hx zW<}ko$;%EbFWN$2%**4uKe`mXjMATjt3STf->h;)Fs5%cBnFlqP*%ePrbM!zFw?lf z{T&BJ;+>i*k&6h9v*RAwkzJjHmzEfSU7h3`X1{p<77*>nt0e6b&4-SR)G$*sh!kR` zse^^?qa_vqi@CUY~|nlYEtJlpR0Rn@KRuTxw4X!Fd=0 z--EH$K|GaPyO2`Vpcx8#URyma-({#KS7w7#GHp?V9XMO`Aj6Z(?@pGQux>huapVOL zR*p#*+ue?#iv0n!NJG3pHfvrTL>4P-7=AEsVODzmv;QKR9H3OM&Rve!qMZh8g}}_A zm+2~mp=(GRh@AM6#V8E1r5HJ(=0#;3xY!qJ-e8;Iu@bgo4D%|>3H|kUj9H}SKd+*V z(|Km!NJJy1QJP4@H`H+Lxx_e#ktJx9Og8o}pP#8cfuYMT|JRjHck8aitz%JR7m<%E zNY`2K-$$R@ZB~2zQzFj~ZNDOAE%3I<_<8x%3-Eyw)n@8?-B-ZEqN61vLxS&mCR-<4 z%=#4O7CK_{o$Ye{@~r6BAnpJ_srFq;*;a^#*by7-QdxIz%q2ePO~3xWTvw^hId(Az z;mA~_zizI-oD>GLoam4oWKYjC_k<7K^2t6YDNQpaA@qv06{vSH>Dh(BdMAA3a|P9#DAHOmhHCrkmU46XY-d-n6)pz8Gu*0~@%6>FR-+X&5VA%% zQ$4Yq06w^A*A05?R3Q?Hq*&!fw<@PuW;Nw?S!rFpH9|dK0}Ue7GMIl(o{UHOh1jXF zU#Bc~cl>;??z?G=6ZL6*RxAlg&v_k82G45osEmA9Pz=LKRyUJ2>>Wi;( z8F+I=3d?rLcEBqPqPj&{AQg{x^yJ}i{ZhLj!QLYzs`4yv*Fy1%YTNJ6)Fz&Oub8)WA9ai1x zi6Z+FRo09SOBT;?Wjq)eoFX+9)Zh;CW`>58z7*R8=y25SBv4QCXcYz(&=m4-65yXs z_`T+{b|xo_T{41f%x%NhHUbSjey1HaMgQ{Bw|wnV7%6(;6%8k~XhF5mnSh`%1ZLmO zRR%jiC`_NZS-XT#QwOEy;{l_hC@C|bP}@Z@j#3k(Sm_3yWa&H%5ghcU`V+INcs56t zS|Ul5yq_8I4RKF3apH>1yVJYF7y4FOl#TlujWi@QNjLt$>w1T`b0q^-!v@yJo+H}< zu7%3q$6~ev712xU(W$T9HrM@6)f!%n;9_rg2k*fXYwF-zLzu|s110rUJ7gkb;cA+0 zd*+jP4+~~3s){i9(Xu-)nxOb|?73I`MIN4Qs%7Ta?eFim-LLwp`1wD6GFaG3ih2Fgv-}@(yJN&e0cW8&ZJN5OJgg8^;s9#iRRLH3u>?diu!WF@52 zsprWVI&zGp_tD*9P9oK!@hG+5>3%5!$zJ?dx&lFUi|f^`sHoy}YpN&O%xx*RPC71_ zZPl;L@ly#smHm+K>Jz0nF~<88lX%`SOv@Wb45ZsNVEx1`fSQiuX$MX>3G2At8sKI} zZPH~evR_|5UrI_P*QcugJZnDsS)xJMRPRLCexM?xOZDBEtB&(^L-JA4NXy-N#?@xg z7lRHQ`fknX!3yc)CtbTJ27q!0b0QGz_O9T3fvuYzKhB*AyI!OHy}Q{d+zQN&0qGT% zs7wU&sE&bVOS---Tj-&E>FdF4dv-Bc!#T}!O6p7eK#W;j{z4#{=bWYbx|EP$>Wr*` z?QMaCgqeYtv`)N?6^IRV1`bhG04r|S=vd0=$AR` zXxfNHlt@Vzz80Vr-Sw94)gAdb@dC@8)y32;$1cg62Wl( z`w{fTcfT-muul=es=IgZ@^}q@3N-?}yDnv~#Z0qyi4g4F<1V?h=_yUCfikXD1LI~= z4R3Vh=A1o7Xspt0t-Lcl^qryyQk|RT+9T~t8oQO7&&T~yp<8~DH%?ZE4 zgHD7b4qCYKysnYnrr3uy&JR~jH;zn^l{?IoW$X>=puXzGt}1!hb+v%A zycfO646k~EyfPf>n_5V}Za1t}J;{p#SR93#h<9|CF&-ZmaM<+_4uv_)G)!g)$?8rf zMzvaF!-=*v%s~lR%ouDoU7BT7OEXpvHd`*mIHwe{x@TaQ@-d2G6OmN&0KMseG18PO zuE=6>l4YnEBpPE;yZ2XM%d~;$ztmbYxs$T%x6?4wI6~`|Rfc!27Lc3#cG;CKj|HT} zw6Vs~5aS6r$eHM7)KJuF$gO8h-`y@)OZ=jrfQ0e53#wKXi@K=owuY~r zHC;)lqj#x%)JA&1k8;@ zN4V1mXkeoX(vyFTMl9 z4;^Ubs$5qpBjSD9StYda=`zIG2kKyad z5V9TFCngTDfXL2s{X2kD;gMO3$id%tO}Fe^$jH5Rlus6h42Q8>LGCy3H2Uao{_^b~ zP|)3xyKI-ybn80ov*-p~1<<;+N^=9Nh zB1|Q2YI@WnPW#5a_t8Tw2lQE?W!a2R6e;Q`6qbwc=-W!kI=&~Tdfozj)xsN@CZg$eoh{pARloz_c1PCU?sI_S=4L>&^eXRB zx$i6DFenVZjk`+C5%fY4F{SM;M|~?(HyLsg5I$NJf3=Sg$?C=k77T-37!WYO$h?=* zg_1j1#eOlb=+$|0hO0l?Ww8-VC9mQGHtPabaob~cwqmA(*7!H#isI83K>8b03Dj|u zM0_KzJZGo}s^JcF0AQ{%nyZlwXoIySn+(H+dj#h`88bZ!5iYQV8qdY_r4re% zCNhmm9lB4v0XUuq^M48VJyM-^_h-;i+%Tst?q#+y(B8Y)+DW(sXHh^`BM6a9U}|}d z+f63`F9eYOpjq`0UW0yzx3h4E1}A3oB(}QJh@A=Q?r|Rk2e2#7YQO}cL)i*n4Gt|s zL|6(L2tXhVck>Hx@ z&`_~!!{}K+udA$lq?C+K!eso=u6a?yIN=^<+7Q7r;Q$}`3Qa|6gCzM{Ox*j?B;kWu zoTY|y_8gS5bhiwVkIGSR2i&+KtCXno5s@9FT!4Zvvv^*hDfqDk{6{r@1CI8+url@- zUfhLmrmmI^?$XVUrqHg!Sk!q zX+_-_lE~&65*RtGW(DK*eHT^~qt+^><{V$3q`A}x(GEyI(VJREscJ2s^IyBJEEYnC zl^^&<47vh25BVNILa~Q))k!rBLKpsxOJ%=ivH$TMfOOk|^flIF{oICHrjW}poP{7| zx8Cd9<(>klYYq@;xQ7twYy-|WpT1w?a551wJRfn1eHLai4infH;+ zL6QsJKeNH~R;7&vf}Zg63fYuW!y|7cad=YV&ujFj52EnA=@^j1c&)M;caBl@4NUaG z(jc;q`qe#rqT$yoMzHczeK)(sNBxF!D0NNIUugin1J6%48Xq1zQYXvmgk(l{D!xYGE5c(guwV2UBShozv-B`so?9 zS%alg>*^s8+RwUSTVo^Ru27?P&bTYPlNle&s2ScWc#oc;iNbZj79nf|kKxzb{TxJC z?s*$TLPD;_!Ap{5j?t6$wIkAtVvqHi>X?qtv+6JZ->Fhyour_f+XUmsv=;PLu5tHm zWahK`LHmp*Xc|R z$Nle#f}=k;ef;E3nuNwsVdd1IyRxjv*}zwOC_`8GO`af9YhCLOnxtT-#xq~#08K`o zhMGBq&ZWB?H;t`~4*q?)XulSv^$lc~*LzS4Mw3rCss87pRzZ_Z-Qdm-3KCRhIe=Qu zs+HtJ#1`fmV0jAJP<<=10^Em#^$MW32!&DUf$CfwQYs9mZTaz!DqpBepFz!GMH`~q zw6*Dnxvlik-H)>u|Kk)?TUWn&F&yYRHY|tU-N(8zw zPJ@nuLS`n00t>;BQ58W1(GjR1yIJ@oVk+ z;HBN-senRc)Y@0>Awfb&e_aBSyzFJ=0(@JP{&y~V=^Y%B+EKvn9uwmnOIzv1xrO2g zj=Mh=^KB^wNkm;tS+fOcsiHsB^<^qiEDp!P3A+5_C{ zcfDYQiYxo@SdZj!D`4;EB`Sxz_HVa78g!AtZpZQ2$&b5f;X->tfvrbXWcMwq-7yBz zuX~-fa@_-6a@zo}+Cmj_?&Bx-{w);&rbTi2XQV0j{^m|DTcBRrMB~e;aWOl4*ku1u zEFdfNIJ7CO$AL+wUX~6yr&vkAJsGc)5o#NjI?*V} z`$u7@;>V=^oQkBot`frhS0?j#C^t|oOk`^Z|Ra^dDL z|K-2roL#xf3y;txr?tY)86S4lok&^^VX&;Vp|_0aM#PGu{il6ZurNUj6~wb=n42WA z@f2b|jBeWXGxtRwr22ZMb$P2|O3bUf(4q!x@~re$;xBW6>BatMk-`1uKU-_j~D zNb86st|oFk(`1cC!3YTF?nLLB02V&1TZ;OaQenvKtz%H>ICfG_Wx|;M>)w6A3tBK{ zzn%_nkn*xFmzNY7Mxqw8e=1ryN@QOYU%MkH`{3~e-cJF(OyHf%pHN#kf?l$cDpn!{ zR!LJ`W>|Q%?x}_-HwemR(1tBRsO@+?(sYZ!G-=JLiLIVTc+vvI1|B8hQtv(O>hgJ#n=^FcRP0B(qOHNhKS)Zl45$y_IM8Z%vIzzkgShGNN%O;Wn>yJCqnmvLCAwIzFUG6*>tXs zGI=Zap?~@I&o92`on6&Qqc-KiO00w=H`O`_D3qod$DoSjPm)DwR-k#Ix8t%+-kE@rAQqv@e zR)_@V$=CxiVLCKH#UrLu#z+Q%TPNJ+zHb;&e`4+<_9gN~RY39OyCP4!6M#S_k=TRG z=a2|)6;B|qOv$ZZ<#GmLT4E>&+|{DS1X5AifYL7Qw1)ao zh(?(Q&fR^(cQ#HHd`VQAPvRB&62x3e50|J~OOy6Rpb_?;)LAh!X009D2{9ts@W=#y zmsfd$zRi=U3ClxVyyRs8#R-8pwQ(;NOGb;^bErNttBo=$@~>f``YdAN^haMG2TC$p z{Gl}mcBU+wJP0Pq(m*n|&r8U)ltP;Bj_YTo^tXJlv!re?C1_~&Z8@6FBk8V;!aCl7J6wo;Mw^<|9?W!*V`&tKh z-W4VCYVxhqD$lH`w<(^Y@f43NiSK~1U63N^R`n?D$9_44Kc)@AfGJB$2~_;;2fyvg zuieL7{(l=}tVMG-&+dKr;m_|#uM;4Tf&dV{!^FW6b0kF*;5{VOCtLV!+>{SK(O|1Z zF&4nPeAu*VwByPYanr~={4i;%Dh$Ip7;e9bI8R<(TuhUV&Pe4rdgSJ)eRt+o{6y^$ zN{!8x@=G#3-DU@f{%R^)Z@dyJC4czNqH7%-7Fu-S+2S?cqWOI0etg2;Yf&tybmdZR zDJX~}0@_f=T*cSlJ<;1zanz{m4Plh-qGF>e#Z&yCI=|~4-PqTQ3Cb;V9T(L-LUV^e ziTFZM8+9gT@J~fMxmxN@e)QYk?{jySx^n|3>8I_k zcB!NwtFkYu@%LT-b&9)El-^|&5u;mNJ~ttf)LHsWz1&9u8{Y|CKScJGJ3T)=cc->Y zgMV8s+@58!`iWbJGN1e{=1My?skk}^y93b8kgY39aw(IC=BG9>3bY}%(M8MY*?w<| zY@Q*WVkM08o?##ZqgY)eReI>}3NmXM%g?YZ)M{d(f*LUT7W&4g9NM8CX>t;ZqIr@Wf}m28kRU6koLXE#o(l+ zBrb+}0+XCm((<`2QjEM3S0z_#wgzcRpE*LrwR7KRdsbHw3l{6>hPG}@j%!|`YstDk zO<8g(f)AaZ{lqLi-{GVe@&*(@U~ayydcIgn^jGKGhiw;n6}3TTM9&r6Hdwozw5@u* zv0a@g(76M8s=Y7@J23_t>x9UKoK$^g_ur=)|_+8V;MPPR@;A@=!n&C4fC)uL2N(NCsY>kPlwE0Y7y zO~rjwgGrHwv##I$Br6RPOfDPB#hQEBt9!-8c(ze9iCG;~l;u=`d)iA|%e0fFhpXsa zDmLGqK!k%3gEOkdDpRYG2sG@gV69koi*15>Gj0GBiJXjD7bt)dr3-pgh@c6_K$32? z231jLW%QTN#>!OUW18^|)ZAF~yFwZ^z2JQ~f~V$L+l@56+_~FUua%;MeeT2btYn&7 z)6eKl%PQtV%;5C7%}~AIweZ;^bs236>}j%Mm^AIWy7%vpE&6T(B6lrH=S6Fy6yRQ~ znL~l#mL?im;OkM@C8KQ=o5e&CltPs2FmN@`0vFDLNLL>HX60%c57nV zBPOmGHdcO~Ghl=Fnb8d?;Lr~io5&qfdm!v@a?q_jZW_41!9h@v!c z=}+JWClJ>t4iV76@mg7J6?59FXp)NrC%WG<@G{|gB;s*41evQk0uNivG!*!nplO2d z0thkKoCFY~js$6Gu%EbeMvdmL04xwnZ>ZFa>?npAge*-)dOxxa6pk!(lsk7p%{thy zFoUL>I%}wztzg2AGKHe7Q(*3qO{&?5*^^kW%H@c?TV!XFL7~mmT>dK;tBKnO;eNIx z-MTKOS?em-5T%HgPR(oW$AmJt9~Ao{18;SR>gqPg6L6|Qs~&0x$WU%N59cXmne}iV zy2h0Mp`fDHsjtbc4x&Hyto0d`?ZzZ)%0>&LoNSt_Vx@K7W{Bj`B_itG>=To`9STk! zh~5;z+H9;`y+#9MEH`&j{C#mjE`9V(P^NM-l!zjI%dJgn{l(H{fDtl3UJyD+R@?Tt_!N$qsKtj+WXBrJetl{5O0iB&*~QGy03%}UK7JfEM|Z3&@x&8+HJ1dFmeIg(ZR%U}$ZD6)G_ zA~||$VH^KYct^FnKyQ7>2LWxGYP|AlBhlt6@(3;!2^IRB`r511or<)*SUd_PV`&Pa zar{sCIJS-ZjwfyhB;~N)_hw3gM{8yy?!9DK9&!Amad(iEnKiOzvIZY~QVnI-6gfl| zPnH#OK{bAcIqB5kKZ(Qr_|EM)CdAxm>P3WTT?E`xbzW@hw(3nMgexpY)rf? z6igUdsHue^KF`40M{ldeEAcDj@5>_F-32<%h0g|MPqJM1V{wxF`JFcySpN7g{RLaO z4_7NIH-3jw)!l+$_sMD}XnTEhCs(H*f%jisFs9Z4&Aw?Zt)d+=ayzIi*knV|OIkxjRHCsG~wMZn3!k$zGV{(+Qs>O;ppc{a(E< ze|#$F?jmMy)Z`g!p||VM-)psGzfAH?Pb+UXsz;`u9o$f#v4Mz!G1!;YOui?8u~OU| z(|Frcm(&@Y>hrjB_5|f|-45pd7-T0a7k5gkO%|owhD#5FJ@QQ4t24yIrvOc37cV4V z?`>W9xHa=KGfKF84*ys^=#Tn{{LDjo={xmnL|Q?yRCt*ttqlc_`rD#icdjt%Cj9F+ z7hk(9@AA*PTpOj`wAEzLs}Q&?Fl}UhVR~%ZH8E7YXvoX%FeL*~kt&4%rVgn{Q~9q- z-bdJOY7@k1Ca!oA>0W@ub>zy{>%N-3xJW2SW!aVVZI_w2S+-rVwvr?P1ao|`nGl+F zJ7fDXn2*0&C-q2uuCJm_7A5$#fvHWu;0(qL|AykYEbGIgz+ZY~3lX*RM(6@Cy?idp z2dvZGzg(Oy`+Cbd9TuTayGa@KNho!Ryd%8bby=s((Rl8hG(Z_7>p4X3wh_xMSQ=in z2R68D(n7>|vcC0vV_o4Jz)cvWA;N0`!zG|)75TIt-1y$6BcJGv5bt+ARmpvx>JtuH zbCW^oN$QGx%7-waBM;%d(n%atN@WPs$;g0yDBQZ+z|C}D*49&TyiFEzfJJY_-Z>c| zBK^8|6-|2qUsS#R~1W@$mV+=AUVQ#aN~)6(n^`Pd^nYAd=?Ob(Zmtl5JUV+uqs|6F z&#aqdV-yp+*cMncWbCe1wY1;JTJ!KjcJ<2sc4^6cs^5Zs0@h+zXlH^cY$&^_b+YKF z!>vr|G~M8By{#H*@GhF}8*xoqxLBz84R^3C`7_vqt*zP~hHA5DNap6iw(mAuAiMte zAEuodP`cGZ&tvxJqhp=QCPlHgXfmp@3l`Wnww2!G6+)9du{~TnmTREyC1k_Dxw}%5rgBMWZkW1fsnsZi<)~bWiGy_V3(=`3;UK-uBq(J@oAyL8iD z_v1-Pr2rb%U?)K0RjQD&FDL@2(#mrmJF*x6Sl!iT?(p{QnRNXTcWf0HY4@h7Hmz2Q zekQMA>}yy3pW&tlwgm`Vlo)2r60AEp^7fF!5tEFkgh8N%YdJrHb(FbHulmbBHj;;6 zdA0f_l&+cPl<^!(*fG2j#qvNS(|t{uBMU-1dCol5H4n%nNpv0={JR| z%i1Eg_~Re;q^VXt@99kq7K$0$U9gV`>g_Z!TJ9z5>t zTxPYy^2Hzxex6xjS{NoskyH?@BSU+pY~XelJr9F|C}66JWhZ7CzUH~3^x z&A!kmF@J&C1NN(eDu-Ssjn~n7yGpvFZP9iHOFlLiz4raC@t{F`dG0^qS z$;3pva4G@{kp3Rr=MK625};=-&tqrK@Y@iUhiPG9neL75$CFA@t9W}+UX|z&lF?k! zcTk;=b&tk=I|gBM{WSmV$V@TVS!fFvhL8OfXg?GVE@X#P6Zs-(|H^Zb( z=khRVLX^*mpL0k7eK}||$rR1U0qF}6zFgFz5U)?HzM?Se-rn23-|l^SeGGq6wF6sn zE`yf-Z!=NR#S`R?nri)rYIF;In10XyPcu#qloquT%}%=lLJZkw#qg+Zzs5s9b(?Cl zsH>A-^G9RnsVo4ZqlzO9a}6QOIMH4y^H5!GyduQ zSfKyvIgn#$T;e1P3b<%p4v|nr9?4h0jdY?X@U^fYMM=-8(8>0ixxM=wlBY!jA%W2e^hZh`^EjKP-p;P~xZd$F-_@C+QNfRw3*)b8D)}4CH`5u@KexG&oUmOyNA|JK`%|^(u^K6B$(-6 zD`RvMJulok1WFDbA}z?98XQOZ;%fd96f~{ma|=Gz^i3n$$>nz^%bKx-$g_0{eq2HP zmujFMH63{Q?D6=*#bLPkj(jKRPmOt!?R)I+qB3Rg(27G5mgLa@NkF#0Ae%WpLOb>$ zO!BqRP(_(lk(^;JiRQthKVguLPuyI7L=o3o2PXUp)Es(qE0qa#NLh0=_>u9dR?(yA z;FzGQAa#}MQW>+{YB~&gSvZ4s0#|TmYeMW5@iO{5lG?I$zb%BIz(jgkuUpkUrj*ez z(bMTB=^`_gRmep()w$}i1-0xmqI=vC#SG((7RCP$00960?0w5}T*-OntDNz|K}HnX zBz0{nrX3`kYEdTHoF?0ry-{SHIw&N0E~RsUh+cW?wO*iOHg4JxnvG`Voe+AEd6UWS z`~SS00s%I}ssz#W!d3$)0#$i3|NJlC<+AUG(``b2)@R;^@7lZMTY#O?S*E%#9R_qL z8b&^)+s4+_>mOdBo2!l5SB+q1L&}p^9jBfN9O>AN-6$l=wlVcvn4~2vZ?dUTNRb-Q zy%Gy5J>sbL2XD^j4)eNe$1$m-K3*?|%vE0Wh5+FY9=c?DgRbbjHdY3S?^(AnI z$?hzEmgO`k9~$xr8*k=0-}$j4;PsR-kKA=!DxOP!1V9&$q2!fjR@BVou9f+vKqVto z3C&X%`4Ru6J0YtoZB%1lb78+6>JH7s+n;{=BdmA51{Iu-Zcr&McT0j*GZa(J(xMXW ziMJcUVDi|hUeb0Du&tReGgFmshK=64v!Zgbt!l5~y&sDPxZ7DzL`m^}O)*1%lK%0KSV%t z(^-Zy_n!hb7}#IdE$T}OIs<#nAooT)@ptbC7HN;W6W=YBu90E{mC5S4N~*czzXYX5 ztp_pg@}26iVbNTivCgDxES)qzMcjLhFslOfXsO1P?^V?* zCg@lYx7FuFCM4oh(9hzLmjO}~$8r%54F#f(Jz`A0hZciSb3AZ=BGkNe|5esq;@FaL zJ>%Qm@t!{0LU%!vsrRx@wd9#vLAY5JsRYEYQ%HW(t2#G828fE;8ObxZ3Z_RYBEp33 zuI=;|ipenM?t#Ii^Qf|}T6sjFSpN7a%NGyrxmk1q zTSZbWv?}D{6!PZf^Nt?iZsV7$3Hp*wo_Zh-hcK?qWl@9cMU_+8bwfJHejlamN_`f- zYk(QtG$>X7Slt~Gr8*k7__=U=@U!}ojI%8$Rp4&HRaoe{^Ot9RE)aXSt`6BYT?m|( zkM_1Gzlt{3aL>^e9;2z$EtN8QgTOTS|LC|%x_59TpU zs{?bWJ_QQ_P1%6>{k$5WpblB%_aBM<0SO?^!IVFO}sJbVX}5Lbtb< zraXXy(`)LCq64EAY~OLhZOWtS7HuxtW0aOs-oPlPOzt+y0_jetA3ql zeJR|p<{PmaDt;MolYPgea<>2~#-up^p^& z*+F_&l)h+57&^#bpDXJHQkN^QeNrq)=wJ)aG(L&!)sO@wdKrrh?`8vj1^?THr459Q zVZ+PxUK=jnK2Cw=A-Ri;Pu@;+pG-9W6Z>B@U=Lh^=RGPfrF-%IkAqpa(EVx}U%8Am z&&qqXOjn$&If9+y>|(*uf+W2_zSdVdxt=2xq;aebw4KjYz68tNecpr8irZ1yM<{;i z*UQo&s0k8p##0j5nK$XfkMAn~8y!jD50lDL8jk+5+)DAyusJ$;Z2>#Du`xCBpu=h! z1#}3dvaak%f3j;)JOhNY53KOl?v)fh#UrM%`3O6^ekEBP95uYMQ5NmyoQP%*xGyHBHz7%wTt3e_x{-@0m*gIxonk#hw)O8H4n* z8du{BbJW{BlXSOhABacS2J>5GA>RIZp#*16QR>t0j=lV2@zS)%7IFZtNb7-qy>sjK z?Z_7cT{IZLDK^8363|T9RvK>l>YUT{#I>Y2eY0@~qhUd@ZD5jL$q?~z&I218KRV+h)3>% z$=VL2$x8x5j)hyNCoVB69@Yn69Cb@G9Gw(5GKTLLM^*8p8qL8|Kj{G~YINUyxIWpq z1#FA2s$;dJ-uVOrZlNEfi62CxB%P)4hYK|7X}s6%yLHgAlUAZkZZx@(=@7Yuo=dp$~t>&ES-! zmH0y@MC&{^&0b^13!*H2?w+I^z>~@K3V1od0uxsxlXKwLt^74+C87_>lp0?y-R)y0 zU+d=ZqMO~sDJGu>ngCiJ=R9lkcn%ki;U$#FDn~cdw_<1C!>D{))zxZH8lX0pD>qHQ zw9*lzAk_@MjDosHhXE4L@|Rusg=x?feyw;9K~moRfu6uoW@jwM)GHK1RL7V*tMrQC zQN7x>fKl7=-HHUZde``fH z4C0nHG}^iEfLo}d(^QhGQ#v+NhVFGss9|B-(r%>BT_R`v=Af<)4y!3*HGGRgV>?C| z4L=eaRna&YgbOIB$^gTym6urSB5|ixwO?>JWtb)=qY=P`?C8MrOKxbRU`{!C?yB#5 zRN)2O#MSAqRmg_t#(lVl|MK{$`Z}zcl!~qu0C;qCs25Ia$Ve8#rgnfcg!9_D*#v*W0qu*Y5R@kj*lyKRT`ScT_t35(3VOmUFd7v-AycLc$KT>AztaK`6|4~B}(&O65!V#;H7nrAe@C< z<5qQEAr54((Nj;=vODlBz-(xWPl|g}IlYCqGN`+1&ZLS?uz4d53v~s^Z6;6NbO|-f zO+}9Vo!S<8AQ^w8t~ct;+QHm&&_TPxo#(9Bc)?^GzQ6rLi{fbPKPyJ~itZbE?D^=2 zBKANHXq!RFQ_{>5ZpJI?5)qrr`g#8vr7o|MS$S!X;nM6b4|pH^P(ELv5O}Usp6u4u z+yc?x`v-(290k;4e?zN%+oH=wu3Dy+U{$;jW!}2@YH~5Dt{0+G@zbC2KiCLS_Lewt zi8054AWWt>no*}I++Sojc$DC}rSXnv>gzqLY7t;UG%(Qu=kLC&Yv5oW-^Z^j(;hrC zQ(ZiFI{{tX$5m~+;=Ws??&czpQh<_KW~KmmJDZta#nfwyBxT#v5V;|w)f{(|h}Ylv zM_Y}pX%@vZHNSJ8?jFS ayBx%m;aH_pivnGRuS92y^uP(#zc$3We&!AxZB%FN8& zr-akcwea@JIj7O7gcJ2>Z~ zJ8_l7DsyWZ!bAt^icLL@qWsGrgspioJaGqUqv!iwjSm4^(y93LB`U}FM$~$>4iT7U zSFk_*ZX~gCA2*~l6IFIVj_xQwpnRXmoZaz-%@l`&Y&=X$)vY0sJn9qc zCAW0$66xKOhh)wV(%9xJGN-zBIH21lKf5T8?=|Ap)i$s)TgQ?djrL_VZG+g;IeyNY zTx9FAM7DIMdReT-`+w3+CWS{r7&3mY=vDB8{CJ27nRchUhP=>#LRaQgL)B6ig_JM* z#mooARe~*R8c+{i4J{7jwzN_1(QCxb*ai??TH3zjQZ|`=27AV7>Lj? zicLBU8$T*k@`fm42=O#*fGyUv&;hhNjln6%VQ3#*2-4ea^7?2SCMB+p^pUfa5Ll!vXG-K?B&bdt#k~B3;Y(D3sP{k?m6BlVKw5#`vj@5gT_3V)Ma_uT zs@u)Ji{O8ufuPlR`X@1wR%b?;4blJ!?F#RI^p1nOj{q6qc0PExpfWXL+D%pV&;n7& zdbUa?*J*hBTe!mEe_FXkSZL*4iJ}X6CK#=k$V=LrQ!DQ&Gj8_0M|E{$Gj~|X7go<8 zFQr09aTi!oaJ!pBF#0oxQm$Jo=gl_mrerHv{HrJp^;&}RzFh+JHd8K4Sx%L$YcJ;! zYT2Q%eIF&Y_zwo(jcp;CUiNuWksjY>tU@RyiMzMH>Dts(*oArAT4HYLn=X}~1?S11Q${tn;j-&j z`LZE*vGtaEyb3}fe8(sg$oKaMQ&!O%-6M&7`AkO#sAheM3L4{-L#taFR|JEDXy}r8 z+XrO(ur0N;uk~i)#19DIf!`eYyM5Ld5PP52eLqfQixg+~HYd?s#e3WNuN#c&TZ+9! z|CNf0;Hfu@s4dfYR0P{qBA@1Cve7VYlmmTzLh#$gN3wQyqLzg62UC?HJ9Z~k+bUc? z35wuowp8)h&Hem6ntuZBr*@Ki{BFCZM)I?PChMVx?W%ZKcBOR(%YE-5)N-{figW^R zCO@MEPdS(W3wm!B_v9&@WC?yZ?%cX_`=$twtm0#K&)<5M#L)GsLUsGrEw@Z3BBrSt z!l>2oLUEW7ey*$CK=5ytG^6Ub>%y|OY9S0|3~~G5nKeuGU9Eyb8v94}g0$82$z;0@ zrKvG^t$a`Gt94E;HZ$2llHMOg&*_?=IaTf{iJ=oUC*k3+GM_n9OC!g-IKyGLbXimT zE(w?SzhJgKnS4}HgI`B(66>vRcMJ1N4e`D{H|W zpuP(dYgNdC4rDH6GypZiX~40?_$Vob?j#CSy9rn0N^ zCK{`x-gN!Ss{-I+JJ7l&mqCWxi<=t8R3x4YzY#RWdL|Q@N<;E}-??@BQ|$6zfeQH# z?*DyKJXYaXGvoD?U|k#OC?VTN*zg9rH(=xC{cgdsHZ3M|3tW-MXvvBPeM*mA6mM~t ziUn%< zpdFMvm*0!3u0ZoVfBn<eO{SC%QS*QIvhWogFZ7b4@}>d#l;TUwx+OAj_EYtv|D zmZ-Q6?su{bJ~F3&M7s+6cu@J%@3q?EOGhId32QeRGspy?b|GRM)gjt!>dCrtkENhd zJH5ncApYU7*WB^Klh9+Q!xZ1!%yZKA8c?1Yt%z|PBkiy@0GR{N|!DnwpB59<_4I;6??5Mh$tw;nFgIx&e zlI0iUR->e=y$4EBJ-nQ?z;5pY<{Vloi7{|amEV>*g6siT9d1&Q89g6?J*(Z(OWmD2 zJEiW8Z!Yv<*l$ZzK++#U`;)dc$ogS>DRcdqGlRfTy>FCQ1)1Jzn-~{*6*+)WGf}{U zKC^MZ-aQ-LPh`t^>n1@PxShBJJ*`*X5DjsX-&^kgess5jb_&x{Ez1+YBK>+=+3^Sp z^;OMoq+PctWO_m2GjzJul9YPej^IaT8iNW6?mIAXRJlPX_E5>g(~^#p$qHo(Yb44aZfATkLsI-wkQ7<& zwJqOp0PUk3ZLa$la~ieo_HyPZ?t_y4ARD};U{-(nA5_gIlEkg# za;oc9_l-*gFML(kEN6JMD{7tC)*blTAJUeECTwc<3{+B>nY1nu1>n!lP?wCnK6L1Y1~G*#goe9N1n5u zyk8wvO*bCp$wqH~`r|t{Mek0}r`TP4HU>yqqHDKjK(Y3DCjIk?M}o|{f`P!UZ!QL^ zULC93F)*3;`f0OU8?!Zlu|es=xHiU;MQwu{dNe~xIOcm@3uZ_vGojZXo<86Z2ku@T zD-q<}LY%i0RwlsNqxOA=S>w|_3^lG%qVr`s9b@Sj0dXPEQ1*Lnf>HvJYbP%Wsc^Xi zXpY%;ARc$lLCTiyJ?q>_%k#;yeWu4<*VruW6IA)xKGx?|X;-$%^RTvjXh6dX)I2jm z7D13=l}C3^tu5_Fj8Fz4BH;D-Ml=pgh<__Dh*6;hP($*|sulQ3Oc~|W4FdF(*t!VZ zh8b#H%9AtNdqj1yx}95U@#Wbb+uprOF7$pN0ZVX+V66+7Ul}%DDnZA!Ww**Ut@XB% z`xZbgq@1Yjj*Z*oN2Xot=&@f<0t_TtYU%d-P!dgbYzG4L#l+kF)D=c! zMD-?SR6zB+9k0ZSq+li-QuQ+k-0TNhq$c`ScSS1xGCI6_K`~tF^55-&X~cm~w7%xS zBolV}qTNH|9BN4kqf%-V)lJ%aulWLj77tC$zcAk0NT&Im`=!?0a*qfj;3GF`ee8uT z7X?M{!u^S{4<)z3 z(iG$A|AyOB6ndk+Ba2IBnjU+Zxgm%iihG9;mRFynVLn|?Z4`5XpS&Zm`bl{3gB%B? znx|v;vJ*CpAiV>Qz)_z*+nXKXYV1IejbyKDLJ zS3c0woxx9CgIPn;bPL~ug=)Qpd%L3Wv+2!i>!l{RU-KmEdv~OnQFrwr%y($x# zZYDtA<6{S;)TXwB7tkVec;Ve_86+lzI`7nJ2Xq1iAp+4W-8I19q8bs81osuPf!Q}p zvck*0JD35p7XD}M??@6yMW^HkLDFgf!Eo(|GBPY2WJ%fT?#a?@vxBftz3QApME#!SBqkVV5r;9YLYEY z%xO3%kIcqmJFI{d0x=4`qCFF%X0gX@Q)K+JOFmB?SG{)m1=BN^{50Aw6kj%I7Mu)P zvsKa_(GgAR8n*3s?@p|Nf_(uW9CcQ(JdL)r(h^{8D2nj0znvGs^Oz zRBgeATp61iS5;@F5+`#d{?zj#=BjuQjNgDhQB7Di7WH3gf*W8v7j68HRWImi;!9$A zB@=q5b&{IKsNa&eL>hZ*I4hmsF>=5bT9SFvInUhqwyP+s_CK`afeT+*SE?03Zri`F zqy@n}WizQV(h)npFRguHa*+x#&JAGB2wut*6D2T66kfz}PBaRXQ+Cm{-8RHmM_qe8 zU5L!>3jYh4co8VZNZq#5c7<)1Yp$#@6t`*LBM*sQGQ<%4k)8leq}`{4FfnI(5_FM!OflR ztOr&9G=G?7^ph{;2eFgGG0P*#uC}w`4dmgx>UE`$4SrUs!9}%QZNQC zECo_Fooxrt%J#Zk16g?<6r9)!<4-iEW&6)Stts1<_vzbUirCgo*^0Q%wToBvv2E%K z?x&kauEEF5*(|b+ipz-i=APf_A4gqES9oVzO|f}(Hz9M&9&@Lz_tUAi zocbOJh#@fv6ZNNn*l=$fn`eSbwI%mXg;)8LKSyO1fZym#I-0#@`T=?i@)45CVyP?{n zsrNOihrjIgS;U1|2-91#^~B$E5iJEZ)1bbZ;1kuk%GA%dOD=U z{3>73LuNY5*;pRq=FmVqIQ{lurB11GlC%PoR!~}zt4`4X(PdtAwi6F6o;S1~*mO$r za_vXy;N@d~#BYI`COE3Adg`+{(y&KP{sX*&w@m92s2V!$UU*L2xf6=qYaslc^~WV>e%MVe^ZLiiyLMw3~=@g#Zf{#D~6Puc0HZ+G3 z<{9m^Su2(K0s>Cz+f@ThlU3~8Tc?YwoH!KC^^y!)#4DHM?EK0)?4;WTRVw5_$97ez zaFv6IHD6DYJ9d*4-&N_5Wh5i|? z!kv=@eh^v9!}id&R~^a%DBYx>j47FbYMG;0TyNEa6nx-$7jkT;z9=j=6Xx{GN(Z%N0xd744lwni(7VZ*^+ zJJQbCCu&LpRFXzI)W>+7LRv%Vk~Tg{e(nARK>-wSE0)0B$aU@|m>A`*&kW<2IKUh# z4O&pL##DU7UN_-(U9_0t0K1KmQEmjCXkwM_+bqZ4twhHCdWHHcmmlzD>Gdftj%s#t z@wlV6c1JYQL96K^bBY}zBc7_zpGaOR<1Iymy0bL6LRDD&iDyT6akh;#Gq{>Z`=mo2 zL7bVA=RJ1-8wJp~4=u!DAM2IA9im$nh&wP4d<08+ZQ(=a0X?Hn+%QqbP)7MyBvGynQutD$YAI z6ek{bvWPErYkc~qK7F%HifA036s$6{JC&VWPp|!mFSlIQ2WPPy2{J`3X0g%JG-@Jz z2d7^S^+hUUpNH~1YaQ;B4RZ}&B$IzAHcTv#6>ADz>Fyu^orlx{dMA2Z?|ipNhM4t> z=!_MF&lNpmAF$FpdQi+}*Fg8i#gt>y+jr0-cido-yAF(bRmxu_)xH#x=Cy5rGrKl{ z?Lh@t7!mo*I$SU(?9@9m*!VPCZftSYp>`izR->c zVv&0aViZ9>IXnfQ>+bhIVd8-wd=-!f{znxmPjTLq7bMVNz5vO`yD-+*v8NJ*k}$4W zr4*rNQ@b6*T2N$m7u*JGz`W6G30>ESy9^Ywy(XFWLfribJD6@k-uAusAWst(sYAOo z9{B805_eb2s82LWF*Dw-S1JGuzp<@^Lyr)P*je2h6uc03uc0IO(!C{RyLjO4Avnb% za@Ol9+%n2V%V=BY8$vB4UU{qszi6OSN~cSzx{lIMT_g$s;07Gl5Z9#5p6MgQ*1bu^ z_zsp9(na}~Ke&JhGJ#tb2yTwC#ePLmaK_a9zVz`AYAa%><13I<=}7j$NNWj>r-cma zXL!L4kg6H}T0+q{ZRBM&X2CUZWT*c+D-LB>*V<9GA|i2u>)Q%0Tx;}F|E;_e+CA!q zbbFE3gJ^JyZ(kI}*uuT~FWF3^oQL~(fdCci*wo@tB`F5>q*ZkcLwU6QAPbIsK2_tfr?aqKy6>WEEAm^FmT)!uoTbLm>|}~a3J&u&6(!IZ+`RW|NY;8D+c#( z%6F6rJA3CYSO=E7GJ7tiUa$l5Zpsr1Zz721X36W_8)&sn)f2P`b(ZC+3f`)!tYZF998R;X&bx4kU3$?t#8o>jM-W-|-C{U@p+%Zw zM7umFM{TD`?vp^6*rfnN)u2H>c;2SIlK-D#I;55JyVn~A{n-;g>GAc;U{wf`lj8$% zE%d!4O^%r4L9d}2)FagRIRvIh98XLy;U*_P1;`kenEzp_V(T))uCC$>P3wNre^PuI z%LzId;ntHO2?GR1KOVNhzqO_ENO>2q5>NkKn2nNT;y;P{a32R9Cy}zWngnm7qE*wp z(gB+6Wc;l#4bY@fzUxOZ_#>)M2xeVgnODt$c1r>AXSA{ zM$Zm-wZ*5D;hdS~6#udtnq(b<&X@ayglK&m#**@V%s5=_dCj*ms!wRj5VC)St!mrB z(niV`gt~cK{FYPstsNGIzKLQk07kR-yQN8+4J;@ zRQ~v|Y7p4M${M#VdqvNAs<=zorvcxHWWaPwd4(FWScEyn4DqDHs<|Q#&U3#eYD6gI z$DMtxsM`Ui@d|7ZwmCOT>1)SfG~+bt&vljgmo@s+>vHwvtf*c=TzDu1n}=+(>tr!lHiya9Jo;PZ*H%6 z9Rs~u^&>9puACVcg!@Ea-VI~?3N2>(9bvUpG(G6QdSA_c)RQHR4YXQQwKdIdq)3-8 zhNt=F+cTdfN}5z1llRJWBs4AX&?P9VC|O^vO~3l2_(%MUGTyB`kM2hpzI)WXci|A| z7rryvF&sRul<8|~#V7-jQPO{{J`VZ-ePnc@%LSAM1q^4J=>;<+a@MiU#J8yY5wE`d80Kq}J~D zuH3)9^*8RnT6Yip&%gQYZ@;Pz^*#Ldx4(VSl|TLQk8l6zx3_QotN2^~?lSe}U(;&($tRyO1icUi(P4XM|M}aydejy%Nf_q|+xc!2dmn@R)gsQj z>OOy7;hvV^#Nna4;wALY^Khi+*tx` zrQu~ccBAU56)eA4i5+Qa87cvHeyz}7L=VNiTS$>*wpKmk$F;4=6NA=pA%W#X+pu1A z*d4j2ZtI=Eog8=bU9qm<_J|S;6iN}=f-j@8ffUW(0A zB6;PsR$9tlI+~LE2e&`{@lT2yPr8%5OZ39kK#$!eQhYsj8*B2c&YfGgZ{1w5Eii#& z)*aM#88zqWk>#6MXkEq2SKQ67?wq-+1tOWHzgzOG7y2BiI(+l8p2m?R01J6G3lxXk z@k4RrfqS4|OzyJkP1cR{L^HOrD@OMgUd-NGu0!|JpWR%jf6h>LQ$HjvDYln19=WK6 z|9h%b=dW8Nwl|)>>fP}?S`@!DEh5!()4p=cC_7b$ApQ}sdFoC2qFonzxxlmHfZzD1 zPab}9|C8eLskl!9<^$xvEQP+Xb>E%bgjb75iLn@6h$9Dcm*Ws1V(O~V12zI3rpxI6 zXp$ZK*b5mTc-CNrd{B}Y{2~wk)!tCRv0TxB4i!O~u0Hh6~p}zPWEU)J)slwlb@YAhgQE z#JxU=pRy3etg6>33LApawhv59Z<~4TP_R3Dj`z|bXHJf&f3VUEAcx0KaCo+Q!lF~P z@oJR7*SmOz+c);}DNSMrF;KNbbcc}Nh=0_~CjiLf6ZJd|E?!e6#{m)%aHwP;_PT4~ zu|cOl>+KBRG%y}|5ElMEPvCT6!(Ycy^8@J9sX^gR^^Y6>GA+Bq!|W;VJ(sDtD*E~4 z-m9%^Lh~QM(~5~+w)Oc`*Qc>-?_*rnR*|D_b?&?Dz_ymJ{gJ*F3_|*Acf=d2LU?g# zg>rb~Mb~{(WnIwcN7K0KexF6r21{}0Hf|$|#mEJrvnzGHal0II_o`iSK|rtVA+Vd? z7~1Vii~|D055H(8kl-1AOM!$;>N?m+`LDmQuk@n%MUjd)44G4d&<*s~4!%js4!c{e zY&L1RKRHFIrLGPgSUp@UoReR?LaLfRF2>dy;-TNbC&wy&;JENR04S@F*THK#=Y{$0^aguSvAWldnNTO zx`Ku4!#3_)nIu_JTK!b|3u>bM+_);fE1p!}eB)x6!R3CxcUeI3)a5CFl(j0}kok;= ze`Re;nSVFklE_{_4@25iiNGr{?|GIl;{x38`jyKQTm*bljYr)oTaNgno5CSc#Zab- zV$xIAq}8FxHY_~WP|#7d#IkjgO)eDW$CQ!k7Fj*IIIBDexWc(IMxM14&I+W^pl2z@ zf6ykb33e)bQk#kL6_spRC%Gc4!$U}8N{W{br5}1i9Ul%%Rc+h#YU0(}0D<$3J^y`0 zbFIAH79eg`MI!DhLQMP*Qz%@<2j=ekgT^J0+%MtMPjnnt!4zuG@9O+p&6BDa)lDCFpyN zw#qV&Tn`&>LqZvg5PH9fBJ8u2&3G0$>Y-W*^_^?a@-@fV|P-iHPpkY?>1GQ z1}S6X?VAO-0$wb_8_0X%?E^l%A#w763Y%N6YG&c#1=Z(P=|c&nf;pZk%4M#NygWBcpr<&+6@;xU;n0bLz*Qz9dB4}NE; z6Ba5Ts}-CMTL-l_0xHr>%ryU@t7}%D_eN8i#z?gFq9h|Q|5!<)-(^NSxr=T*vQxv; zt$s;E*N+w^34=?E4@$Scq3Wqa$Md=wgpA(i%RegU8g+|*UmApHfLK`P(Ag=-8N zG3~MK@ht&j%PEJKg$i49@J16ke{bRMxf>ZvR|shda*l#ZQY!m-EX*sgkwVAF)WDX= zt^s*N@Di{PEvG8X3tQH8VOxiJu|S>C&&Tlo3gHgY@)OXYU2A0??H9Z(P1S5p|D!zG z`F!#krHu*q#zl1|XxTzGa(0(*;%^enu5;u-kXy{ymRp9aSyBf*y+p-8MrvgD+>od5 zdl3Sa4+!R(4D3HC9S{El*9$~PoDDJeb}#!ySoVC&9Y=4HpsT{U=j%;9x-nu#dZ0R+ zRTc^5$T;?#l%U19`>qd*)InT=8{`BX!Zpy6mgtrXHKUb#|LC?f^*>0Dn;++QUDa117FRNac z^~CFF(~VMKT_|O`Ltx2+gzC?plV-tLN6r_MhIienGqpeh=|$&r4u_(z_{xhGTJIw!=!r~NEBav$)nse_m%9T2N?zoj zcDOp?(3I+*Jt(o4H&~p3tN<-XVYYjVHI?t#L_v5_QHWCIj|Q`3o$}nptTjmHIj3n~ z2kE?_6vHRQ2L8_zQ5wfv&{z3EqlDV|opci~}eYMRBk zC-odMO?$YNZ{6Adt^9$}+x2cAs^Vqm_Wzlo1%^GtrYc7R_6qI>1|m;3n+q%Kd2?K{ zRU0c2FYs`MGO^(~o z>4pa_#~^(4i`n3vzs5g7iY?)%e&WO5t9n?Y$l*g_S=ss`hf(>fl4?y+%t0F{_AHAs zj6qT@MQ|0@?)Q21D-r6ts!jBnZ+*nkL6$AOtG%)at%@sLLz2lN_E*RPnqys`r4%iO z9DVy8zUeEx7=n5`vuGC{M)*$`ev%u$QFbm2mm_s!!Z#a>(e&#@)DmVXzI<7YLA7dY zMjgO6rO3PoSb|g-o|?K4;TziqRp!`ejw5U@->3uYg4sL8j8mA@hq!sK(fILE&0Y#_ zowbdoEod%Uc>S;q4KTbQ5@zhuPl~73zq*^2H3Sy>-ma-SS-9UEeyzS}uSK}4`uc7H z$8oIyw>OC!AqV7Vm7}s0HW`h_k_xz@B@az%-1`vclv0!(2@yb*efr(Xk4!Cn{4ha< zoM|r$<^n>td51{sbRt@*T2-*Ggh<{n9Uj`jL_!FC)CPgu4kvCuzV=^fHLLQ4mCl0+ za`!qkNF&Bd*n^?Q)$StQCsgu>8PON!1f9g>NBWEp=a>`;~ROp)#*_4W<0-8ujoWN4yAY z{1iznw+PQIQO@JuN8hu4w6~uPC9*iz#4m#(n9C*1X5jozik{ULC{1O+$F4^6q8($Y zCdD?PtpdMH3UbaV#3#^|gTt<6IWFjUuc`*DsYxi`20E8AE$%BBk-_D#3zDSnMnJ`i z5B;~sedu3wn+;`Y=0|Z-v#0@pG$CA9wY&1EWqL!|<|!FVzoq$_U(C?b!fFV_{<==}juHp|hea5J-E04ym)wNy` zbvgEQlq?S2O`xW$bU$ikAmXKoYSXT#iWFmY)Os9H?b_-7Zcv1;SAc;qPmlz`Uq5gk zW;LbrGx^2HiYVSMHn7PJ_bb!bRq?r5n&HUiVe+JB^nTy{-UZQDaGUriT+GE2GrY>D z_;cIsJEH?c4oCC?PmeLA+oHl>;FHhpt0aH;U_$r#*)rKG^tJ)$MchDDeR zSXjZmE>cA7w%!uEshC)R{PS`eW=TQ63JPy91UH)_cj~ePI#%Nlc$HL|y58ZwlU6kP z!5ElM>eD*Imv2zr`&wGj_QOI+#mF$k1yWy~`1r+C%Jd>JANjw4@(O8gF4*O#1K+6? zQ>5a0-Huuq3MsRC$c}aRrfZc<(KXAR=m1=HjFO5$=PA>(>wd4Q*P7&kRM(Dl>=m$g zo=;pxh`blfu0&SNx@>qkpc)t}FY(%R_A<%S4sb?mshr)qM2xcsYwx%s{a~`1cRn_6 zh=PvG@21YmSPNYV4;yZESgNTF{Yg``&?_U(5YidJrNKZmGr06J3$Oz?@f>Fk8*OE} z`H8|0^n-8Uv?khXa;uigsoO%(=E)HrY>~hN)kk>cRyxN6BjC$w(zB8;M>9oKeG_F| zor;T-wTQjM8PrO<{SC0keF_D$jb5FhG1c`;6fG`tHdcE=2;QLbGLK+_IXwL?N2}b$<3_Fj&)j{wPC&}dI@R= zU!&~r$7q}(Gl~GR*zt9Hwq5Suh_|tI^@Z+WR~~x3Yv1lXu3UmY?)ULX9B8-r&|}q8P$ExT?5=h{%aD3&?=jrQiy~fK+JNns7Vg7UB73_i z*1fG&L&^8RX(sRa%0t#u-W%0bpTC_vnMKZMW{&Y7u$wX#hiFAN%i1^UN0(=BI4Pt1m0XL}G_!*`)n(6Hso#3L`Ya++{(N=N~iAwv35MC!W|o0i9V|REr^8Cj^R5#e?;KdZ?PjL=m@olRdY}@wYL;CL?VJu z6PH8vx*|j-w?buyH<)zt*i>s*?xSa#nmqsV*-ek8`0~*cWElwO+OaFvi34yH${bR6 zk#{WF``6K-IasM-g8QmnXIUN&jsg6Tz2uK^@7tq^#^C9j!%98vDkw6!*x9z|i|%!8 z9#@678LEKElWRFeA`5me2m(m9J6Ao9t=T-)5u*X749%qd_Qv#C6*F9Xrg^c^q&pT3 zjd3M$7O@6M%ca*7<;GC0^hvZ5Wgk(8Pu-W_jl|pSg3)rh*D{6f2)67Ff={7O!}1iC zv}286KsEuRzim1b|GaA~8-m6CZmMe=r7m;#!2O$rUXnl#@&vKWZHDJvY1K9aa&Do7 z$aA6Hxpn8(H3D4Gn*q}hqF-iXynMxKH;f0;TgX#hw6Rbxy^v)bMygS+5h4Fr!Skim z9P~27cK98plYn{*g)5ZAQNx!b$irr?jxf>myKg~1$VrWq8v1qw#BD38YklQe z>w1MYF1}=ZY;ReEIj$ov^h}L3&jr8Nv}e1$jls24WWKN60{#<)q4s^+r)A@e09 z#4~9qdj_RTs|hCsyq$aZ7?aCtdojZ>)3dO)5Oit$8YbKP(~2??InvYMN39 zS>9{qvbcy{uePU4&9pW+FcwKsVdheoN>JXKoD$a#a~P!$e27ox8jUVK#|leEu-{I1 zyf@u5R)wcbHF>_mLU6#4dXjFr(uwkXOrB?sn_5waZ@pRvot2g^Ir9_7DZ34ctx@SR zW{yNd5bQa7Iw=e*jhcq(t1X|wg-2Q|rgPYme;-_#DpV`}se_W-G`?Z~-dt*^zp?7Q zKZvIiyrXBnlN3)~IMfqYF#tqByT95^w>tgqB3q9AhQ^(Y!q5Npi!e6K4=@m!X6VKw zYVZv1y?f2ZWuYn^I~8d9SWfsq#gD7XO%nTSmp zKB6}^^H7uuzBOV_hGUl}K+G)ZymU6RgQKn=4#-yD_fT(JTmM8_S`pt>X=ksG(!!|n zzgx$gg&ap{b(=WAmHEStyD!)08h?O>uvxbqoL$2Z=pDGQ_kWzeUiW;eAi%zwQr_72 zl|Q;WA__EUvd!EQ|MZUIG5}{`<8%Fyt7?Na>((UzWwH;La=g_vExVD({^%vw@ zDW}c-mW6uR3Qb@R)bIunnF)s{6p-)(|-@N_o%|8De#L#kkNY{4N!sGkqem(xB3Fvp>mJS7aVT!oUIZ*q z1cH(!R_|uvy(9OV1VZ688j83Fl3X}yNSY@JRGhZQVk__UU7`&;$e?;leK#uI?E2v& z1H8D#-NE!DB<#T7qq9H-#B2?PeLo<9$g`+TQ;j?yjxJW;W45+)z-6cvG4~K{-_h#? z)G=;nIhl0gK7I4jm9gkt9h9|^QacJe?sW%f|I8zGXk^fT51IR2PT|--(Y%Ff#;4!P zcLPaJ2g8sW^AcD&H_VDGM%I4JCVBEQ}8%vXS#k5cW8%ZZtL zrbQ|niLJ{G+@b|;abT{C-Lu>8d)?n5MdwC$nWD&gM0QJ-JAn2#9j$NXk{f5V*S+me z1~cTheebXNbbFr$eV;~_I|YCOy|a(?L9N^+t!Z~`gpxML%zrQ4WrB)eMC08_%+0Xj zz4qa);9J^NoS~qhA*CyPk~5`(Gc%6#wlL^IvyQbYOko=UbGKC}Qpn@6YM=-8X%%M^ zTD<;pR~DOv7pj2t8Mu(yl1qesif#aOsDv+mjoa}MjTf<4S8BhO&M@Ez| zGS_vDCSt2VOm+m_n$?|BsF<7iSOA$M1hXsB4_3^*%>-r6_yLc)(G_>Qh7NuJAFMk( z9FC|b0}nggXvA@+%BsRL0wGp@jMPrEvJ3RmHKC2PmH- z+a>C!TJPwp=c(9uqwlZ%^fvY>hH&k%?Xmje>IM$#DtMRt;| zV(dm!i+HlKYbc%(&hU!3`vV!_-38ZMG&uI$3qJ?F;NOzGojqSC7gUwlLx7W_B8aHA zOm&%&GoTcSK<12;mf#zfEnE?pSn{6DG)B!>7s`hl?H**3KZwuPZKw{CO9n5vg311E zER%qQ%oSwW-b8VMMS?vXJor$O zA5!#y?KVoUg+18;VN-a`5WUN!Lm+5bg_cA`rEF0pqToFEQPM6*zS~`^ak0T%n02MA zB@6=CC87&QRQ2iVx;edT>!A!*OpsbT<_U%C-glR8yW~ zmJ^MN-<1Z02m8={buvZb13Gg|lO1k?FWUZkvFCGTvN9041S_>8n6d%I>;RE(M22Y4 zknv*&iODRxUR=vL4$-O{t(#*js z*U*lMhMH>X%(iR~e9?ee=AOIaja@5utgM0KcLyX-Zm`(N>pUoapiRVs*|Aky0nK= zuLE(Z!^VAcyEdYQbp@&=12+VMRZbTnZz^AjM9~HnG$$)dGnBa4DGTZ${Am7GiNy5& zjOF-eGoYXtM z7pXdZgZZIsm<;_({7KvT5scCg_olfrcU$!Xdd^8rKXxw3+8kMwdb@UuiwP>2?gzH!&%E^iA+oGqI;g3x-lLko->y6*`#s>15ghd`7)c6Q@PGkrzRXIuuvI;v!7!Tb_F_Lr%?dk^Rx5 zC^uBJQ}a#Vh*P|U==Jw}bkexclqNmnk?{cf`E z!x5!1YeB^QlJX|pR$1e@kc}Jvu*k`Ovgc*rrJ%Buz{AuZTk4huwivqqwdwt^#_O++ zRNcq+1kSkMxF5Oyk_I*ZGu7&ziy6{+}dYD3x>6)d8v8ZdIrTTCs5Wn-U zBll|D8!6-|^%wf2c;@aITr;2m?7NkE`K5<7!qgzHZzfQ3#q`>`DB>;)vK9bv9K@LH z`Lwz|r_kN>{o1s+Lisv0*LUAig(zEPf6^s@V^wrdNWE!m)Q zH_FRq*MOI)AC$`@G?+q0RHBk7vwHmgPN)9JV_YP6k%yWM`W*rRYW)WOC~^n#Z!&WL zQnfKCS(H4d?(rOZs=}r=Ek4}E703s+@uV;R+O8|3@|st6d-`8`Jr z56V@q(EaOROeWvi=9F$XW|uvK-}lS$&Tl^nRbw(aENB$>w*%obP&l9@J%;+q+)8dTwqe zorkx$+H)(p4T8c9lX#$>dhr^N?FGAF_kG_Q@l4U+NB1EQ;gu*b>}iG3Xs+gkDE)$97fNW`j^y((N%cxRlfb_KH{EyV#n3w~v3zuNAQ% zksLO|K#_I;oN1z{kawx!vP_unCLqP+*82Yd00960?0rj<9M^T`U&-)d0ti>b04+)) z8AAmLKoVpC#E7K4RNT(Ws!lK~vzU)I+AD3n)^;XBqgj}c!uHY&?bzWz;$Jf7`_8$K ztZo2=QFR*)ctfJQtE($B?>+ZCzQ-Y^6Wy`)T2&-ywUTm4uDJ4TKs6mv4S^~)3kca& z+qFq41B*bvH&31gfu;&2iQW$T9(KHWY<&GceBdaW$a6+r#;r-K6Ro8dtIw(P<)f=4 zLXgLKsSwb9cTovckv#OfPCm!}1-^!270OX+_fbPLF;eLA)4ruxs{{hvIONQ@2u z8bQ=n`s|NA`4QoLDt!X$+ijfPKi^b6q4Y(RwLp$@6q+%fIIBKp4N8BUtFlx&ZSgVG zHUzN2A9+LJO(w|ldtJj=ULQ{_x>KvVRF~q)lLHC`X%VsPo2@uF~1*w+GP6zwJTcUkr zN5?_;>0+h;9#y{O`*pjX!cUNY$dd2ffE%QX2Hk0u7`j^8b^?Cb%F;#)?kzkMGo5sw z!4o7Lc4IH~F^S%NHL7|}#y znT$_go+~d^ozH_bmTMw@K}Q66vI93sWwZ%x3O9}vJWuH4?2Z+yNm6j?*7G>KuLLn2 z>j8JJD8Jf6<%kJD+n;Z?B7Mxez?4pcw_-C`qVa)vRR(@X{*!Th!6Bbjyt01s=u6@> zf4vKR(}njxzMZ=9lPfxnny#EoJGg#(uK2%JEU>fCS6eTAivu6X*BD_4xiJcR9hBLq zfJThVogWqCKZF6Z|FI>>mPc%(Y>n^6gn_m4=e)n+O)4Nn+T$s+>wkaKi)Tq|a-ne1(G zXq-y%#yYJYI`w5wgc&9@(bsK;TsXZ8QhkDV3{{I(iq^0-^Ym6_Yue*B9ctV+)~$(O zqedt6Po-Epf39CLk#Y9oY!wEvJLFLGG)@iVlmkJ%mM%UMM>@ zEr&|FkjU`o35(kYj4YCQd2%J1E~OW@!Rqot!?C3;Rnf8bvsEa-il!7jtxhU#0vZYP z7l7F+G(U@a7N4)rN&Ogb|Dhw`YAN^0FEy)rJX*^mpo!KtAa@>@_E!jf(Q(tDPGh&E1S&Zcta)aXI?wY80Bm zOLLBYzS2QK!vOK5nzo!eNLBPtQb4hla|5aF%`C@dH?bOXDaolK$`hVNrX7`Wz}$4x z@{!wmtm(FKB_3pKy=jl_3;C{V_g!zixV^E+HdnsXFW+}hucj-HYRt8)cV%avEf$n zb4LS$DqySQ@l_>1C9RJ1kMK>;Bv7V@Z+oV6xrZ(=dc1C!1g*Nwsp*)~Q)1mYwd6Ns z2?HNT4brQe9fGtIg1|IRS0{b-O8D-ZUo98r3U#+x=+t;@xmbykY8$Bg*7@x& zfj*mrqil8>fqVaGul*)@Li{GSKwC{AKgbvdnkvDqF4=6NVi03tt!gopOE0{5%-#!c zPkjV-TD>i_ji~xnV;$A23QwN9KIhJ^Vj?5HI;Q;)F!)sfzV|A00O8Bks_r+WH&s$I zWE3Z9Dr+CKe&dCqvMh6UV|09s$fx7T@HOC|;B#dx%!tmppbnYqZoQ3eaB%{)!*$Lq zsD7pPWS0mhBqW5`O2~C1vI;f!-OAwb)ibTk@)(x@MiipGado=97KUiA&| zI5!R&$+y5?^lj0t3f_yoYn6U_(@Jx<)lm&5du?0wrrzWQx6$?Kfm8u;R*9>$LZ)!+ zsMti6(D=jQb$k*qs!ge@LWKm;4EH1Sg4?S`5(1RQF$%&(K^cf-zx5@0F`NGQb@^WD6Z(C zTGI7wz=w&^%Vb0L7dJS_kk88&saF>`c&QUx%W_tfV2gP4UksbR8J?-~i5hIlX_dAe z0zl6XR?WeoW(6c+f9(0MzSg3gChK^>S{}$IhpA5SwcOiy`S_dp^2@itc!wY~X zt!PHT;?FdV-I4r*j8sd&f29==2YP`Hpzn7@H`T*0XC~$=t}8oc2pKix0uwR0W?Wy^ zDbB?epHT!bOAwu%2$%A{l16)CGWJf zv$RpWQq3u32_UaUfGcb#M9SWBGM4vBs(@uKLh;n@sQn`y=%e!2ihQ})-yu8OqYsTu zS2o=+1CkyzoGs5nf1U_O0H_HF-V;aBQgA+x#fv-`_7k?r?~{3LiTd2G24|T zNPrZ_Q%wBOm9>Y%Q_ptkvCzkL2T_V%ks%ataB49ov25&24z6ibh?Y0pPTj$P-ZTV( zz6B-_`mM0Mf{2C%yyKd~xKqA1yozGD*XLk;c;Fy5*E`L#6Dhe$G{-_UmwV?Un><4h zEWCbYLRhp4nDu}%mwV+a;)cZ7)0`4DZ{1iZ0`#d%fCOf^f&sy+CLw!( zF95HwW{%|57bHl~=ZArSirZk#?cMX^g=!I3_Ru$4Ll1`LNa&OI1-i%JkN!UWMDcCB45x!AA$T8`&Y( z1<%Ec^kU76swi^c=L3wLo;LfdtLBpxk;w})(b zTT9mm%gY@t1AUn~OUvpuGt1b?CSVRr%$kcCZ|*KM3p5hdF)@jh^1vVF#nJbm3Ro|) z`IRab1E&7`yS4RE(8VzdUL6a?73{GN2;<{)?;^O4nkA$r8~)#V5ahb z%92~jMU6TNcqB>Q(dSeDP2IYq$2Df{%2D{>_MM+1H~rxD2X_{*^zf(FntoGN$nI9= z2EsR$ca!+R;;1|sJ9;({J(BQwf~A5TSMIbby>7D#JmWN_G#d8wvRij8HNKk#oFd$C zQhg)8+M)1JSB5m&riAe50JCfUP^&+cH%9n`+)Mmg#xN#9i+F#9Vmic&pVN{ zV|@Tw+D#qD@sx(z!RqcXF2JkFWi`7ae&c1u&I+H1R;v|AkZO`nb1L{ealP&Ar8&eMZQYi!NA|(z z{q&5va-OaXqTQMhzr+mZM@llRTMr48$k`xG`5fpJiMDH#s%%*+z!+Em}J3ur>%|IR!R=0q6m?r;%S0a@T1+)`DbMU28k!WqcYw(Q)k!qxdG9YSq zS)rOIjNLU~XV+TeGh?7p1;?WSb!A|&he((uSpZC+-lR1F3pHO4B-ZwsD=G{i{5D9* zMD+piP98<;jG2k`yK>m5mB&PHd#Rr4t>F=gg!f06q7rAmfRdswv`$AJwz29s!EL(b zj(IhladosjKru@zIF%`eHflDHM0%I(>hDP33UqdRWHku zHc;FFOhB$twx>GHkgm~M)-+5qYc$`Lhg3=B@I;EF+PjU+)Mviv>$UturEuV_$UbD9 z2UfKx+MwqDk?FUMrk@;U##E?x+o?Q3^4D#!C;p)>PtO0vt2e85Ka97P;-v$}lX~K7 zfr~^w5N+qis_)Gram{J96k>^9TAd0!M{#E)a;iTee-}GnXL<4ubo5f`=J5)&_6+GC zA(LUus=b7?9ehC=GtaYDsBY&+A%`AF1~if>(2d;@$RDZ)oel8)s`>MqUng?@L2VQh z6~MP*xc=rB2Q!>W{h79TjD!>)nPGjxGkY3}*7f9)S*DXEx7tGJc^plc|Dab%rft-z z@sm=y_~j5R>#HWqa%CUQrMjy5=P-;)M?2G)!^vG-qm1cp^zK=N5xnWn4Czc%Jql;` zIWTA2Kn$)5Ad-3v_@)QQ$~{4l0V8Es;rfd1hTKG zu#}^BVW^Y?UYqhVhQg$^fjyuOZ+Xh-`!saj=qef@$uOSqk&Gt`_FQjXuMlC7iIC_H zL9$Zi9OU^)+1hz%M~~{JNqwgPylSnZRGhfuT3x8}nrUJ**c~_Znz88*UhuN&t-aM( zYuCTb-F}}uC!L~6U_7b74NDD4{hU0Af5GXcahoWQKYK;qgEUMh;W?@BfO% z1U|i0JT`?9H7`>==+T?z+V=qXj;{=g5A%Uz2Vw474GOeE^1c0o=4GF3Jhy)~g`PFBv+Q~8qfY}p-aN=7FdXxV`d$9<4&5Q!0~sg7U6@M? zOwi8l>wm;-(=6Rh`|Z?3g>oz$cDejG=jEm2{^PxusrO#ym4fSzJb)sPV|AR|!Cy^Jr?W*Nc?l*IXkI5jRI6Re zn9e-6!)pRKmQ;d43d6AmZ>!~B8hu}UsEPXia$3$+!3h(0$cxf8zu^}Q8)_xNCCZ`h zxa*e&+M@l|a0wr2sqb)Z>3B;Ls~3p-GL_)t-CxZ zn2;(R;QIaqwo|y?qw_x;Eo+W80#bnk?&rOU1*ig>6{^R^>Gi^`Z(|f!e$D-TOb&MGvni#TLBMc55u=C z$5xdUvKe3zK{_kX>dRKlKeP%MaLcYPw3zZ@(YE(>eIgq2WRu^J!w5$ML*~Hn9`*QD zSfuQhDlw;#8R89HZ*-Ov>MCCz%hBK_UqZ+?q_j9`yQ5T_gs0X_L_5_ZbhPP>-i})U z@d`xx>l3n{^i|ub7t>{f_iPIS5iNSnEW=^g$1zB>O{PD*{-Y(~$vfCcMsOc)$(gpx z{Z@OW3(ICuoO+Vl+TkPC0RVHiBTGw-CK~k!PxL3eo+GcYxbel~uNTFgkAC{mP5u?1 z$S*EwhLD!hT6bSI(pvG8$JCRp4Hk*Eh2IkL;oxQ^f19qD1G$&z%R-&elf7=-r6xtj zn5V)RU!7FNqqFhEH(fvPrXWaNT{pG=2ixk6+-BTboX=0E!N)XfDdDJQ5=dYla8k6Td+59I z8X;}y;u~cqSY%oz{*~y<2Mk)`)tR@^sCkpBKzclw;fzr%)Z1)qZZA31(9RlDpMFqg z+0)8CVc@KK^gVY5&JG93n7pF)rcEEcdpBKQns=|opMpzfD}C8e>*ZAV+ZOZG5iZ4*$2Y%58>dN8-vNbEiB zNP#R;4M~Wr2Er<#!vk1r@`fc&zVAF14{yH?)%<`NcP|ytz@7tmT3S3A(3#1DT;o#- z4XL-L`EQ~1K%2$J3&Uj<(0-UEp6!g~M2ByqIN^IyMR}3JZx_Lym#w8*HQjmDfA{1; zrct+rUz-&_mgDoR_<8Rj3%F#f<@}%7nbpVedRzR>kE$<~nJ4MSuO?Xld3wU|EWG{G zn?Sa@;`=}ErgX!E7MFYnMfUf9iCWurTQ(C9FJBji&N99@^14%?L58@+VU_>AjT_iO zygrA7aljCIPqUu@jz|sjH~nlSp@azm;?BKU;{HojupDPV;Tv~9yZ6f{S*$6^@uEtZ zsgxpAn$Du@IhT$_RY-B_w$kRCEv!?YVOD9)(fU@qtW#M$e;QTHQ-{gb5F+uq@1|`v zW96cS9I6w*1W#J6tcev$Td7_goML&?sDEt+JuP$;poYi^kJqQp>{s(dYLD!DJOps& z`DWQJpNC0CyPPy-XV%wFGhvgb6V9Z%1#8q|ZqDUrm;&9{_)PQD&~Ck);+cZE6q6^o zfg66T2u9?c&DkLXHaV^zOUZCM0){zHU(oiL6>qSgOInm_IL^@4AKzpGdLgTF+dyR3J|ZU}uyprO$y~ zY&jym^U+T}^5Pgyiq+8zAL(tBz%>T0&Wsp+A}do4?y@^Ne?Fd={B3Iy58YxS8;Gwh zZ46C7vHa={sCnGf0V`bV>#lL0XEel?=OD%K`M<4CtG3h?i#y7 zkzRTGSfOyw($Woj~=K7OG@hxZ{(y%2WI2&pp zvs5Un29n5m4{YkU?%xgL+8m5ZZnOh1_hjWR4dJWeGnEOdXDUINT2UIVy<+*VyE8X! zs-v&l8qwm;NB{Y|-%HTAebWjVqttRW50L5MskESWj@Morcic}}wAmUXug$Xjs1S(= zc2;=Z3k%YAFTVeG9JpgGyZ8HlXB{JDNm1-X8+e@uNDOc8p%eqlKQ-C$N{5l8h6vND{lH`0TooV0sRNH&9LcMbi#bdf7 z3n!(Ystlaw4-^vUrjY{Vm9Jp@@^)p7(A(mQeOcJq+nHj1`F?XsIQAR{rYUlA0U!4aLZDy zPOkje4dv8ST9xvFDRK&VP{pA`04+LG4)Qg>5AS)s-aQu!Xi25zD^A9q;ErBzl&p(n zhCZf?L2uhRWVs?)De+^rN&nJk*JX&dh{T&v`zG0FMPaHY=KoJ7<}P zrf@5{C4tG8+z|^xi(p8e`(}7+_S`qanQ!pyZXlf*W@{s7y9MPWWI;N=naXv<2#`=m4!aMD3!d}^`xMd zQdw`EI?v+0nhD?J3NRYA)Xb`oPaa3i{P1Zz&NPnn$KZ~aPf!HswY*|*+`jSIL`CZTWZEW!)0|D)YoSt-mZc$#cT zs~Ql#8Os-;6ug?J0KN<4+@pFmMhL#B35~UjX7fKJ_Gd9D-=$bZ=HO;lw8TlZ?-5wv z;Wgb__u(pFY=xPB^wr+S$V^i}@l?Uku-BhnCR&Ru$zd zQkLn&uF%Yn^*y&ut>nF>^#>P4MDB6y`S=%$!sB@Ai%R@t>P1r-xnyLx-tK88C_rLnN_P`(9{p|5$wEdfz_;t5+DoQhdJlmeuP#ohk zft%CBYCi#mkX2wq=uE>h?G(EmC$#)w1OOX_EP#JG)t2k`=QKJ8YE6T;`FnYTv*Po< z`-e6=RQ2n2*~uayFXmpg>GE{!F`fJHCJixVv+m(fz9a^#Am^}^wG0M;&hb3_k`M;k zBktSRt-4kaE8kq1lXbP0ioQwS{#o{;DsJK5ym>Rtho~HY{eeeiZY!tx$e14fYAA;#mg7TL1V>m9yTa2RE+L7Mx+#vu!ah?^1FM}Hvpm_3 zp1P8SG9+_xgqU>$aV2Jq+El6DfG;0x=O9kYvF8EeCi`#;I&zp_=!K?FoZa8xfDom_ zBMEkK(N>(4She!=@(eoRGN&1y>^#C0b!4Vl2GUijVE&fGVa*^V3m-T?_c3~4kd|Ch zM-YQcJZo<4QVQ;#z@=j-zH(wF_;aJZTq7NFCo5~0^XE`qBX7*$C zk!*^-ExuH3!v`A&`MbW(G!O?95~E zA7_F=%yO33EA;vhDrhep><|Ka=v#KR+qyML)u&E%5y0z;&WecTZ4Rr0d6@zLhZ0J7 zPfj!66C7SrKu`_{h>l9<_pfEPwFMCc(S%+@7Y)eUwA zm4BniX`Xw(lZ!|i2md&vACF|4{EI7oA$Ls*H$aWhT-A1;W}RLtcZDJcu)3;1)`ifU z^#GinR=9n4`^w2D%`?uNE!e`XRyE2E)do9sok=I<4*DS&#tm__D#spsSYyq8rJ~Vw z=&Get4^XJNSQCm0<}=;Z@FHZcbRci++{}|gpiM^X?5*On9i{dQZG7j^XjGXvHwRJgswjGS9$XQbwW6-j(iH%_JB0Ed+W- zES&@rsLDJe^E`whn{w@^^(k8tFP^p^N}Tw`CVe~OiioGXid$7mjvf5^R`Bj|%>@Z8 zo5}2-!}e*gS{zAn}E697a~GPBWnK5nw)jYe6azTJfNwif(_!& z6>Z<(dp-o;zZaEI0X>`NvAz7By!n;a0mernZ-NuHo@YS76lOpCZd^B7O}(|>n<}U! zG?iIedZ!_mKmv@orB>fFP49@~dk^xm%OBa-Z6N1k33>Tcwv`ZfR^8OMwfPifolpMV zx*PM*Xo}-*9R9%p=16RUR3;HDFKbO|&vn(2&%KNg1V}C(n{PbT!dep|se;AA#yvHG z;?#IS@*j22@*x$VT%AvZM$f{_geTB^Q&?^=df=ZkM-Z!i{a>-~`pHb{@Q^w-Xx;aE zVlmh1pN=z26t~6J;Ns3L%f3SyQJaP02zK4jP4jj_X3z6@;r*>5r?3B0;aS8yw zyf2$sf`%3Xj*8R=JFpx!evn1Jy(9kAWcs=?n_b35JULLU-!=2)U3o~-*FmXm+)dx}W=ucuuM5JEuyiX7dxFlRK}S=|2Zn109ktycRg$TGq$2 zT!eh@>^ZS)Mki6u|6w|2U#xc^O*C*!RSGfSiKAYI!s%{THb9+&5mi$dqKe2FswLMzzogKhu zU2E-1-|NY?KqJv_4f8-_HHG?XNV@Mq&r4qdx@>>`r*W?0nXT&!9+|Z~YGW?#jL$WY zw`1j1pJoo_2kM@|_$`Zl?iC6+%mFFpo1|aVON_DYt5BfINu>wl$FDTXK2Q({xIQq< ziV;Ee%7)m?a88^_BF6LrIFL1j&sf!^DTK#xv*0;!M&$oE>}r62Gz^-3f+SZ9FNL`W zqJk->h1dG}tr`nXT;OXo?Aso$0`{ZBFP&HO^;^9zX#xgKKkO-b-XY zB@k>?QsEMaIomo1U6}ezvL)swR7TVZJ>Ae$IIV|{ya5f5SC#pqMb+=Z7_!n07gu}> z5O3?vCA#J`M9PQvU4-H372Sx0%Q9~PE1wF$2b<7)7tK6fO=F{C<192xH0la1Vd8XJ zP+FKNEZi7BR;dK|be;bZo!W(dV?!QtWnaN05>Qaekr1XR7Y-yC@QVOgTW_iX@87V% zD#jZL6_gz7>XvRYp_k5hPB3M*!=^uxQ+AUNE>?VE*Uc=3!a=km@pu`#ekoi`yxz|L zY&V1|LkZ?E>rGi7+QGcv z^6YNTEVy1$?oY=2TrPRDD^QXS#4@d(*53yox~||>U}0!*J6MT+jppR{JsvjPmW6Uw zXE6CiVhax?+S>HHHrwX>yHPE=$uz*b$PrdosoZHKREIWE+AiaC97E&_67zC{?rE1d z`GH~(t?;-P+=Z*4NJIG{D7Z>EF~vYKZC?v?x6f$gneLcQdg|MJ8)n3YFZ7I07`_?z zp0&cMMx+g-#-5v`UAp2F2ZXul#BMnVPE1uSLy4&S9XHYhey_|nN4B-Gm{L1W65Xgn z*AJP<33Cs5U8$HDX~$ak&Oxie5%8-s+??#l`&n-o(SzN2Jd+-}PBXRUiy?qVIo3k- znur*!*F8NBB7ORDj@*HHiGa#^jcV;bC7^6J;PAkGD>gM^s>UL1R%MHfZ_U~G;`{m) z%BQ7v^XzVEM>Dy7N|>0*dT+Wum+j}rCb?E7=q0bOg*t*=`?L6pZR+5I0YC)KV$zQ2n4rl@)HORGc zj^*LINs}h~7}@|D7KyIzFjwu9pPA`a`yaobpsr^a;2HD8Y~8ft7s-clF1Obmtu9?v}9GK*laDS zOi;V{B>w6PG*K#3iVfr0^nD}(u%}$bYQ}8sB>8x@rF?|aCY2JQ;q6z`)9Gv>HGl$7 zKL={3=@8dG@26*csEgu@$*tY8o7UYV-|yDlc>aGE#p7xE#>8eT9xsX4AXaL%sbyb5 z_x$|1BUtsS#|tmyJ1bk{peLa1h5$c&Z$tCl9V6Y=YqLoaX%q;H+=+OD7bM2CWYE_K z1KxaHqu32mEDb-PF?B=3BbyT~{q{tkHW*p%CmOSSTGM1SB2{C0w5;p|f%9BsFC^|Pxk5BCnF(q?cb)L_=y z0(g0w8oqPamRY;{pxf$eQrp4oRg_F5)hEJW5{r{gyjLH)J~_humNi#}B7#S%C+M`s z(IJbQ<7^-oCCWAM2yE-{^^6Khj79i8|B`HZ!)0LH=x8$&WKsw5JR9(WwVHl1in;kJ z1ZzwuJ$y;lanw`57XVJRnG-F@bR3$}(Kon}1!5WD1%f$K%ZzDrD)8la+&vK{wTy?}jdF~25L;*hK4>PZux%a9n z(ndVle^ZvOK=#`bQQ31k>xFK;jdan^pZaanZH{yG6VzF#Pz!6Q5mkOyttNSvM$?Ys zx$66uvrp#~i+bD<`M%kx8ElDExr{_$ z``0Y(URE$>U|Ze0qas-iU#G7HHn{86#P&gxx{P3Yg|(AX*;l=SU>39QTGCt_?kWAz zMoyaU2)Tw?Z0u5E>c;E3S3yX3?hTT0)8|GsM48-dTe8s#l>#4Z{U1x!*oPGray2i! zX2!c9mgT9beXE;um%duT4q7!ljUp5pV;wmn@}F)c>oTfq)oN5cb32DuiT%Uu&s+T$ z>N*MBq{){sgH{h?)GqdDbia)?@$+(%8uKtS@|^}Le3%}RT(b8lf)RUM*&eN2iCprL zE5DsE9aio?#byAE7-_l1=|1$VhU$VBmTtR-n~q?{ZSSE}CViz@GukcH(%n#@=Ntn-u(`Ky>%N|p1=L=ud9`P%HRI>w_kPTkAL)|J0Je` z&g~C>^y51}{ph2g*b}n%xz7(`@A5aV@zniu-g&Yg-nw&}vG^->iygRBC0!#(qoQ&L zS6x}3*5353t(rq0a{FDs533@qr4I{7p?AP*(HA2e+4WmhxWH9Q+KxojxRyiWr8~?~ z*U-jA=kUaBwt+H1Z1(i57`7+yY8V0|L(zA{nf4y=xt1d`(kl3S2^L-=(QsCt*l$*h zUW4Q4TjN$b9hYlb*8X!<3ayyC6UskMTH|k=|1KQ79Xk#Y`^0g%+zLh^SDfw&=0?L` zz)|ZZ=)!Fs>RyPW2QSd23X!7_rlEzweUg`N-1)zb?8sKnPTVwjyDaLLyWVZizZ(f@ zREUrd6SE2;ctJ&%>4A;ul2>hyZd*;K6g6a1MF(`K*cV!Iz?|6sn{Ciz4aZUGNp9O0 zG&KP`vzDX7RtO$V+4W|8&3OW#Esh-lcKdpm!*!E6eaJUW5vzealj?BSi{QrwegDv& zUdhTw=S7$4ieHjCD%HM3MN_8LJ$s!}&oFhi&u+Iw?&B5%D(l9NUHOgwqQnN4sv~uz z4v>P`n`F%EHZ`Xpk%AVi-sW;)c?q5~b;V`3QA&pOK`0GsNYLGkMnz~pne|a*%{FQ+ z|57RW-6CvPMdMcSFg&M)?{L?f9U{wOZhVv+{eY(R^(F|I!f#Y}0!vWKHV_%Vow|DG zMeL^9E*<>l$E+mdQt@+hvp5Glvmf{G%;xj%3pVOr(%62+mae+i66hTH50S_w5$~ZP z4MALY#{&!K9WSFrgd;k?(9IoI?)3_UL&QG30V3oHxQRXmrcCOk8Ac)D%?y&f>{^e| zs<7ov*O%wduTQ}9j!Y-A;Z#b4-n_OxhvH=7CLMMK$cCCm1hRBb$@9B;Cb{59!dB(enF07hkdY=x+-iF&(v0 z1;AGOD10l44W^{T^+o?Mqw(_oEKLYLu!X?I53MvZ zg4==UF}cU(n7U5NBKO*)2@oYoFYzLIsvHsFRmc6LQ|5?Ib6Z32%xG*o@6m$cq(L6= z7OS?Cx9KYb)>>U^V#O_bPu3i+Rhx&8{~~?aDN)qWF`-4m_3I`paJc|rK%c+J_-)7* z)GK;51{`hPxNK5x%W5Yh%dBS^ZZ48aDd(lwzmyv;+j5bJ!7kVufG9+L71|=Zx|pHJ zVN-a+ZbdlD3(az%wSEAn4)lwcQH@S-qvaxgv$Mr)J^&XgD)VJY+BiFjwh8$iy8&_W z`UJjRhx=^Za6MUcetcuA_Xcnp%??g?7Xf*JcInV3uC>FjM;QI>vKL-^zm+84*8W$cu7f{6#f| zu=0N#(K%q4(-+4Ptm=vEG6HJb*2qw)b`Zzv6BSj49AV(t#L2%l*P zAxH8&`SDE*lMlT{Vt$(2Z{bEszfl@5>Qrb^SObL5DsiCYO|$8;wu(8=xd`gLc}Ytl zE#hXjEy*n85;um}u4-P8v7-`2luFM;Ek$k>yCsr@#Gu$|X(=}c_R2NO$w>i8^+yTX zVh>zrh|ag=wUCiZ@A^1DA+VvE@to9!(@<&v(MRLosJ=xdEnK_H4s zh({Po(naL+`&pLT^^l)U2SJuBx0T{7EG3}I4n8X{K?1V;1k4--FL+_QA*PNre8dki zUzrk>M8VM47=lMvocjrQMXG#cg8&O|@? zdIDpb2JrMP`XRqcZ zKV7?Rw139wDVJ-i;DkzGAiGSw+}5(<6ZoeoLjTb?0bN|`R1of(iDi5Es}|op=00Q4 zN-W>9D=RCSlc!TD!9!sk{ zO;~=gN-;A2b6Kl&UO6e2C&?HBGfbr{0$4cPgJ3Y6P7_#i=@Chn;+5GnOr-sgx;y0| z%Z6m-xqm6CeNfz9{|_HHB6@}zw!u^!yVf%QUqDfs8ziNsueGf!=$#F*k@2sCOY$&^>CDi9!()t3>ZNlXYbvf62BWwM|)vo(O8V(a}MUS0Voh2WFt^^r2 z|0tn&lCDg&F*Gk#KN`4{ zL=@)AZ%xE_f zqozIvF+QY>Rck56)PQs-U;eyTc7bsb%tVK1tLa!4j2yD2IU|d7n0L~_ew_@SKS&_~ zaCKdII#{>ac;Ze8906{^t>RvVdPo_its)IRxPANfLcaqw1^y8!U7l8B3MSSp$aBS7 zOw)iQ&YS*p$4@chS>XVaxLjjQu*zf70iKCG6}3A7SBfBVw8Hc zmq;YHAEux8uwWBA4@E(I|L5XS*FNDLziapV)~d&tq?`C$qC*KX_UYJH>1E%kjuT%GAF+xJYpjSA@#RHPHp|k=d75bWdnM)2HW9z6K36(C$SJOiYr`X<+%x_Ok{>r6! zFXD;<%GNsw0#wU%z^j9x$_*13e@?xQo&7#+cTgbd_FbB7WIN3$X!WtIiA>$Zhdu)f zwhtH>o~qUISMXF_TU!+c&Wq(G*_7XS@hQqL z`}KFz$d-ug?U0cu)<4_zo1oiOTzy{?O~86s3M7n7^IUc+=Ll*N0jCn%(FC#HHXcg0 z1T|)CDcg3gSd=L{ZK^~HMdx?&V~kc8?4CSljwZ!2l7Vn$<-{ z&Q9~v_Zm+@mIj;Dwdm=g*k`3aSJ1jfc}O)qtI=@ag8MkD8ti70$Cs*($sL}?(S*=g zC_QgoAF$efVZdF^CL<=1dy1?Ov=rmiD;NnlH=<^S;&^Fwn$p& zTgmO*I^=!^XHvoO>9jIKJr&OBB;}|fB3JsOq4nJ!^vT8{0Y^>Gik}rvWZ9ySenPqyKeV zH%c2hb#>FQ3Nb7CEsP2mDzGz{$%fYpO^sHq8$=Yq8J{0#$~>FYVrL#YDvsBqP_BF? z)pxj6X85X8^gQo_Uz$!0E#@*Y%XpFYe`IP1#FGmzO{Jr35QOau4{@(}z~}1oWP6+kJ&Rv_sYKMs83S7;#STe$keFVPr*yzL z@$z**q*k{*h=-jm=Wgeo4pN7W)D}ST7p?F27}at zUQ9P-xemfp>z8xT-uzupMdL-2RsZY5Lt_+NXiU>T-^sd6o?2DFDT;L7>OVNaBl=D#aLA?R=YqVwe9<)vB zi>t8zx4-LaHLKnxSj9KP(Cvx zhN^;4fuuV!32m0U*?O@*w~vmscGt<>92NnaC;4|**1W$DfAi>rBR>`mZSeg61K zfquiWh+_2Wzv5m)i$`Ty(Wx2L8vsomdHE#vm8ZY5BLKVsG* z>!#b#>SQQ3b*mkOV|g7lS{9tz4WsGu%l!%rv%+GX?`UIAro9ANq-duCb@I@qcq07N zgD9av>tQJu8=&l^1pfmRm&d&}D8h*uVXlVcawV#Nc0oN@+o+AC4rXjms97Sp!6Ydf zx-!6|@(mhJy3*fuLh7_-LJ_1tBr@r0n1Ijunv9}7_>I{tNK?8jrk^PH{djg05dhrStdp(0kW<9cWu!VZVd)7L`auwBJ7*&3p4b?Iv$fPBQko4a^m; z@wMqLF0^%x^I#aJ#PG_F$2`r8_oLZmqr9x0EIMgLJ8VPLFxfC}T7}7%8{I0Aqs|h5u zULuUFf0ggifnq25tnmdBsuag)X1(Yov{FZrI6i-Ec*dJnQ^`%BI5}Fsfre#@@$f2~ zyFNf@@Bm@}*C#sm1<8hQr><2hEtNlG+zDMHYtT{TWI7(}KzK?>(ZP(>OCO*j z?6yRJqI9~V?Kw;mi(J31a!d4?xLC78_Q1eIZnBeowk~cwuEteUKU)-^ZQMV~Eq>C| zee7O6wAI;P-&~~a&QyRQs?oDzRB=&Qo~Q^7tH)Ixe&|`T@<)S|Xu;j!R29LhPOB%& zxQ{sycamDz6wTA&W-{38s)eAJ5$Azhwa@o_S9is|(zg2=9zMwg>fjfb7%w0##ZP3jhd{TO$!CECXeKYQ)BJW+aAgAj+D zQ7xycZW$hX0B1n5{5-=<*Oe-^{j$$^ulY?0d|@7sobmN zQ~W(VS&JuCx6K54h>61ox9|MqKY#ao53!@CO+9+|E}-JT5RRZY!^ZRwwOO)>M~tGT zNIol0q*E0yyWqc*3~G_Mz@kGkMA>taeI}I>GmpGPQH`4D^2`QWi_07L)o~~FE~Oo* z6sgL_Mbwbv??|?40!{}{Cez0oM(1p^cocf3W;F4KZP%7{q*noRTwMY6R3e{S_POfY zPYisy>69jx_gZ~}87GwK5kaQaP1z156Pw<+7CW>q>r4HsC_RCS%r#@xx2g0|whb~j zrh=<|S)B$uiGyi>n`#v1X66FB$ij7ed)l6RxSae2L`J^tyYY+;QQUl*XREwb9pF8H zn>X9@KY{P~{wCmTXpNv#VXnX&{4(Rei@I1|N)d8M4u+AhFO>C$=hWpFbZAD?D*$;a z0pxpWiMmMY-JU7oxF}IR%v~+uhFqUU1y$g9&QzFGYmJNvn(t?Zj^$WKVcLU&-(J)L ze4{B9YjK7TS$fP*bq&dQq@;m}S{kDZS z0$-@!wI2?>S&+TH59sdYlwEs3*(98kr<1s#g=e(WP<~$@)}uM;RYiXick;|nD!TRB zV@er;@9Q)AEVi=ZbUEvTfuR0sl{}VIIrDveEFM4{jUrVoB=?i?2-_sMB{p8yC)J1M z^`*x1o~bdYxM4S>4pF=X_m^vDzFqk+w>HorA84<8CUg2C$6Jq8jd1slc+c)~V4e znh7g-*}+=YO=G0+Tq=v77n`nS=*m1_p~R78i(ZBBcwmWKaF=>-8)RSfiBlUF>g@KY zE8Z|(@**y1Vh?Cnb65`Rr_fWMYyaDpda?7_%tnaot((v!8iMkRwuSPz1>B8o$F|1U zDHw8-J&a-XvhN@UWnX#!@@i&FF;>lRD}6J%?m5XFfkzqa%@V@w6{y0>pD!H*q)a>} zb(!07Q1tp>jiZQhQm-jD#u?007o$z;lAi=Y|4OOUd3-79{*o*%l6bHf(?oKa*{Jma zG@GpK4(@b;h;A$X1lettdvxQ@M?e1X<^t+W>gY#X_10Y7Jj~+6^^kcAjy|<_%j{Y& zQ^uD%Z-8rlH^W6p-^?h(0>$|sj%c2Q_ZTAN`}@DBFGiwBuW5hT_1mD2mhstL_#kq% zh*SpbO76-`$nAYTwampj#F-?xw$4z;42E(h0BJxIf%^(1VhspshFl@>@~gPQI%Jlp z#+}3cw|^?)OHx3d+@K1@CL#pmd@0Ocm9m5SGqkYm-{wbG1rRyj3pv3SAeaLljw__bAhC0JqwTZA&ZUp1D>#3q2N7Bel^q3r^|Y($ z#l=OLSO%NfD$9LsS2(sWb82MXbpw4KB&_7>J<-iOJ{;fsNOopkJ!nYu)i!6KN^AlH z%5z#i+zIo^C$c%Kzgvsq&PPAN$+~;U>1{i_1b$5H!j6g-_8YI{2)uOI(|HyaVnAzl zSCl%euHYyix``w<)2T!#sixB^xWs$rSB$v|)!RSX>@H78@4-EHfmTmNcmA)aH+(Gz zjb5%eRLQ4Z{Y>3|@On0BaNq;-mw|Saa-Xl)6UnkgostYC2(dsdc_=3kj_LF7}QJEvORkIrH$Ze{oWZ1aM z5@Wp2N#tdE4zwm7UiDTX;lr-Jtxs1z2`}{D*?D1T2?saqm+&&1rX_Tp!Y@U|L zLn&l&D6zIru{#Ts=-1$0v{875bImYt{W!H`uUk7~Y1?ADLpy&&g@^d|$P|*dC1*A^ zI`}po={&bDSop+WUD_+h(mN5micqDD3pyIiC(F9kKICN{^Y876xl3uXys7P&4Y_4s z&DBg{0L-?@DZ&H_?y66_HErkdtOEvI_-$C5z(5-*C+q1F?5Y{F97p$ zo;D^i|1Df@=g*(jJT0SO1v!5`6528#LD-@ndyK%ZPm=MZuUc=W2mqzZQK3X%syFv*^s4tK#S#VLt76?( zrD?VQ2B+`&cQ7Jwr?-k<-8#CP1>(8Dpr-tf-z(Y>y|B;Z6MCrrrt=vXp}5iLc&AS_ zwJO3kBB$9f<$ur=_JXV>RhUf#Jg5SovT60b*46F-(33!ElvWpt4cq2eU5dQOR8UrA z#;y@J&DP`oP@bHjX#29;o^)8_Z~>Y6dRv3bDrK5u1(dV4yz49L7H=eX3VmMn6s6w;H^#-q z-u0~>^DKVrwsd`qALs49Ctdd!bP}>OQdH}YkUvT=Mu}mC3h>6M>UBId9b!q#c|PHf zGce*(51phE89a}uuU2@|{+(0OKl9-dW7S}icxcZp-&_ILEZc(lWKqSU7gfQ7VP>WW#w51@=~=e zdc3Fjv6p9t{~rJV|NrcLOOGQ*cJ5yxypjNxJU!Mt)EBo0a!X^&=#d5^$=CO8gkUmA zMk^mwJ_=Q{^49D72Lx}d_5k)qyV;dUt0AtGWdYG+iW%MP^2vIFIi! zX&&64@1^Nzwd0uTR>`+?0sNgOiYTi&D3^G;!BU}t$i1Ri26N9=ZdJMl1qo95Lu7yS9yP!J?21S3xdh?z%+=4n1AOszU4(vwJ)d)nJ zjQj#dXaE6HnKxCII>taGptOZgWA=M`Aa@NN3}YyTYVu_nGJGBLE@aZS_5QpKq zH`}IWcTKJdchDEdED&+T)tFQ;W3^~@-Z?|G6xchG_X@vIDM|eRYWF9ZxvYXe>vs)B ziC@tbKvDCLRK(U!xm?U0^$+CfV92?^Lm_r`Ml^)dsjvsq&!dD_zDr74uf3)Qc-&Ek zeC-OQy84%C6b!HPrCxkR@Dju;z!a+KOuqQxR2xiJI2)nUS0@nv?!3m?(b?D0Lz#df zqxE^{K#57mrHhgx+e4>&^2Bh|)z*&RFoGab#^rD00nlGKFg!=4oRuN^LcF&rj%^t( zzD!*C{Izt~#)H^_&uL-tCuUWTC|Ju@;E^;(Xy0Yd7NJM&o(Mn8lg5EhbVjM0GCFZ$ zWkr3DPYKO06o8*f^37RhEf)vsLCQvnxm~wZ!;}*LjJ&~4$PmI;@y9;nd{d^fBB7RG zkiKj%li`g--!gfKJ_1D*IqK+?99yfE<~u1iHFq87pa+nHGVg+5RH}JyCzr;aIc|w0r&Gyi6WzEy)uOE?*liE{ zmi^8pKIOR5_BI`~84j_~j!7N#nm))zXR16d5eeX`N!9z=GKuc;?}&%*g6W#(p{)&y zOlcw|jjfkPav)l-NbSRd&5REKYeTz0*Ut-u(_zQ{4uCTfJ(7AQr>gtb9E2eJC+ISpYnHLPb^MwN&sgvPNKDI(15C8S|U-BLyNQ2u9-S1k7Nvj29&3T_0c#yQa)V zsLc3?1O-Ny6K8hy z=i@WTMX8UYiE$-z+cOsDH}HK>r7flVhV!~lt9Z3@2Ivt(1iF=Lc2x25HobLF!g}24 z(6fJT(5T`Hf^Mw~!n_|WzTzJbd}RdMBmzU7v{^dU_1X?4D-Q(uLJ{KZ<9lH@sO_ZC zA402wfz_jaL`eT}!FQAvsQ#fyu0FsL?OCu8=TFOXiB`TTua|$Lug+263v*@)!#K-7 zP(v7@ujZDo~8U*oQAUoh$DE->{X7I)2%!96=vOv1HL+yIXk4z@Afs9cT zQ%A8w2Rd&nbt1U5TO~lyLhQOhuep&{j8bp@Z1%MB*i)4kr%-WtkRTiufDG)eX~PZU zM9@N*2y<#v`o};0KQBJV@U;scu9mJfh931H?0?{y9lIWNJPGB>vCIiImKvH#NJFci zDFS!D8=Bs&8Dnw%Tzc|mDW|xY9MLUdyjj^4hFN@u6>$effv9@r;=Ngugvy;AKgoOZ zuR$xk=@}RC7JQlh&rSd5sl8gBy}#tJx>pFhj}siI88JLkr4n6bOd2s2rVX)0KnViF z7q8Z4+Z<*t5AtMs>yWY1c!{vsE7jPkn$1PF$@EDVP{wCrZQ{e zo23`8N{r^&#e!ww>VgiLPIlmi3Qpz{Ioe&dWR2WrG#CHf@gb1fS1lSQ$6%X5Cmuq5 z{ZKi^e7|M5;q&>uQ6YRsnM$T*k}b|aGnn4bBQ{> zRi6%(o1!rKpg_iB8|8z=7qxer0jiw!hZV%(>(e@I(0Q{DChRhr)ia}nksiw2Sh5Kp z>S`D=>{00QiNMVr7xGli*gW^;)BZr3GKk~z1=D7NASyF1V~>qgMjNBMTaSulZsWui z&*KTUFXF&!q%z{$FO~sy3W+YWimN^}Kk`v-tWDVCUJIN)02JNA3Y+tyaQ-B7TO>WI z4U;F@P&7Z!BLB+mv5Qw*`ks{n!ea`V@w*~PY*rVqc);Io8rNygM~OC|5;+t9hCh(- zOJH!C0^EEKJ+VUiGbGHC|E?RJaWFLSO4O$clA%5Qc!Kd~r3jd8U4%|*D)Aj8Y0Jjd zS|R8ZY^)Qt=C&C()?6>-EINB5qv{0QwMd#6I1EgD~HCEFSu=e zzp?Q&j*&Cb0UuFT!rJ|d0!qMUP^;D9r|+L)zyHCsbZ4T-FW*KWFm0>F^*>Pz;4GB& z@3{fCSeZ`MqgqM9@y^Kn*G!~w0^$sCvMsV7#$;epB`2)iY_zFHRRBv2(my{P+J>cx zu;~ouhGP84+KPUt_{(2B`H%~7MW3^RZzAGCi81}5jH?XVAisB|9lBgvUeBXv&xUVm z<4uWyAa1p#DLu@MDKbJ z{5-q>yIpbObz+I@R}Z&s)@g%AFw32Wh}NFkdW|^cwKv;lBQgLyFYA(*gFow$3wY^I zf5EK3mda5DHem{w?YNdt)=M`oK}${@Vx$CI_^~UCbR#qA%&>_bFPp~`ie8L%DlY^I z8wquRuchJDLg)9ME#CGedxUz+P;~kB7eDsmy39r`SoLZX*31)6UL-R^9N#;8 zYTzSO_e+1Ax0W(e|A3;4gt17!>nY@VMMdq9PM3N(;P32BziT@AB^i+e&d)P)`aM2j zTC)<8F5OpCQdFW3h7I2B+_wl&OtG&o{)69>qM#f<9H18LheM}_Y@Cs|_mPsb9aB9h zLOJ@fuB(C{T(&+E2WsEb%XlizhgW=%sn^>%pPuy#1v;Q0?OL@g$@2Absw8r7{b5_i z17~cvD9*~6SV8Y~P8H4CruXJ6_<%n$rL%78lZ`OAV-o-V&ok=R85Mwi09nqra7{z* zMzFN2c3?B#1abs{{H4c=mrG?Z?*NnFA9m;tECs4p=Cb+n^IShf5@#c7 zhP$~o?lsruNS9!&((Fx`cq9-6G~R*K@t(89qm2-s9dk0)LZU!2M5ee&O^Q;grT~b> zkxs%RLLtwwGHaB4&f+vZiyI{FZY*~oy|CXc{A>7&+aTmO;%AHCfQbGLi{E7lxQaX~ z?*lA-^FuLbBNjZKzU8Kf&nvtJVa=zFk;WEh3;PCoQbX-d8(fyq7xBM=S0DEnnAi^sjbc-%Rt^*1`F$(2BXskz{hiXD1Y70Km9U{F;pO2qZ#SZnq)lL18%$wI16y1ACA43dDqtMcY8%H__8!Y$(uL z9>LA&#VK$q(CV^`oKS;2nF00<9d_pxj1uf-!vbH*neaV-1bovD{^4#Px<44dtaKy* zEit}mTI@fr}fsBSv3c~+S$b?79jK*z6&4sWgZ4;61J`2Ea~Pb zpY+(3dqu7uwJz?v)9oTnN>1O+nQemn;v&HatG{uJU2!Vn72SBk882T?|Q*0*V@v9nhP&wMxIHItfeJ?J|*~G~jt_ zd8Ev3j|LL*Z`o){6d;#l4bI~RI-smX2W7<00h#qk@y~N1x$#8@^N`12mXWbBYd)esE%CcP}S}SymS3187aM zSkVzd)Q6@v;w!QWGLn+@cQf>rALRM^ct#RtvAuW|lwV~A+bpOIVXYfhIu6`YX7`w} zR;(Iq5Bt5iwqK`$F;_%+;eGB-qnxiwb9&|Zv4B0Uv#DLhEfPV_9K0gi#aAA2)K-Ci4z0PfJFGOugF5(}FX zj*g{&g@Y?VeeOn}f67fYc_1Wl;eN_6g(p~w;755~4z1+7tYRWEx1u%1Uy{9sxnd}7 zPS6oIA^nt-2_QnIkH)VHI%l^6W!%1`!S)+LrwJLg1&!@ z+fitH1Uce4E;i)Kc1&5L=O}Cqy^6q_^a%_L=oP2lYd9+@6Uhmt#)@bFL1XRpHxGn}a6TMfahIt>rdm5lmWK3_m zu{6HsMUUsYY9g8Ox{a=vEM%q_+o)g7m{E1=IzazCo-6yo;&WXgSg#b%KnM}JRAt4y zrn$-l656(QUZn|%_2apydb$gXl%8vsnJ=9e!m;gDCSs57LMEC+hl$ZcP7)G}q=Dyo z!zqW8{^H*uNW_Mx6+4|CTdO?nIJ91&bL**QD6q6^8R10Z6 zz#m~W?!9UJG$$Hst`zs1gj6DLdN_%1}g7+EE!`D!f1t z4%~cLdMHb@EyLK<(B*_&p2##ed#?M@d8ARorDd`3)Cyy6<8b= z27D^LT{A$vjV|y?t}Fu_fJPr6nZmk{wzlR$0H7aK6 zrdly3$crhZe>U3znRavGGt5oPJOTB7_2ip=QC5P$*Ta3u@dX1oHiW6C3%R+`1cNSo zZ;M@+`7ZSpg=-O3VA~KPN&378Ox3D6&AYwJ?Wo5$P(D!2C60(F)sg|_xyI5x74@I{ zV&^6%C}4r*W-LDS^FQQwf{nL9C@;?bASK@RC%mi##vk-0#K#V;QTC*RKSoSjGxqH< zkO~!#&ouz~oA?A1RieF>449QmDu^4kIDp|GI26UjtMw#B?tPY3_hE?a&%{N~)#jij7@X2q! zdGd>2efaAqzy0W=-{{}h_xY3#q3|w$`}#T4b)Otp?<+_V@d#|ywCm+>XOl#!D4=EhiRUlW7jmGK}eOKfGT6dBdG`6|{nSVG`mwq649mR&HH5hq14 zur91Ly!m3yWo;S+2t^~yuadTx?nQa=y)NtW&_IJzrv7bItC?M$O7vnq9Nkv?i~lTk z*_@&a;kP7^%?`N?_PyjTDAQO_GIQI5v-aJ^kG;o`ZCX)7(;s6`_ML6M{*hvLZ zv~pBvxM1Pss_`zn!SJbDG_-x_CbPe(Tt_A*?kU_z=ldz|ZOf=FF<-;-pubcxn{x3F z1KS${WejCdWLUq4?+o3g0w!&*RxPuHk>RpFG?iQQ|G!->Ht2isr<6CAE^Tj1-;lr| zRKgWeX>`$xj{ceuqo{s)kJ*g85-7h0;u=0T2vCiT)ROerA?wCz+`XSqL-wI%#C>aA zuku!jwWL(UbhedzXS(yQhe1~#BGJXG(_9(b2aAs-2k^-{B!tzAsA%0@$!J3NW{Gng zf@Z@kU-`8B8wUlZ@L5$9y@*gw;jTu-YQ~~M)0#DjIcYLsa$G{Phpr$_ztum8CV0fGD{U23+81LH+S}+2hK>j%Ij22 z{-qPWDxv)#xA(n-S)*)B{S%muZ{25E^iL_i>x?B#hs7aT6qUSMvly!^!)65&j6p}V zK}{Vx`5D(qbcWCzd3}&fuQ9i+=V>^3WQAa4q=PA?Tnl=wh*D6k!j8rv2WMceqzQQ9 z!JK>P_j?|90DH#BfhKNCV96*biOO4q$M0B&OW_2V^c3aLsX9H+p_rl}8etOg3)}XL zQcla|h-AhPo}!yxJ(fF|TRHY%LkjMW!z>GwXW52kKsMde;t}i)d-X`mGHB9{$BLtv zB?HsN20B{wr#m@+Z^nyF0KAR9+bq5m{r;SoW@mzo$u4Awv@~5jBu@zX_H1AezELof zUCH4?b#8+))Xf?M6CC7e)c_jW95urO3@tae1fc_Q*cRmTMf-edZ%kT%fk|xp_Wd_wG}cj zp#4r|aF_w0P01ct*Pr;6?QzZ{NQ1o2UBx(5bivF5ArS**5M4@%@N!;88tQts*t+96^xGS#ZXPszT5ntp>TuJpo4WISI%bPd z9tVc`t^QauLHZ*ja#CE<>&!sZ<@yvVXkOm%M%B|fE=gjKB4c^MD;(#NERS{>1Y|vJ zR)2R)_06B{gM~l!3xn?a#4)AR)JlO?Nkg#N^89N+h{V+iQeph(blDCqiprO!FRNRJNee6d)RN+oz-Q!V=?$jx9j3R+0JoTah%;e6q53#SbKEV@}Y=1%LY*dP)x-JM4R2z743uR zlHGd4zOMa=ys(v@j!KS;dY@qnn5}vsy$Lb{&1OS+g7*?oKeTKy^^=eP^uIp)oTX9! zzG>Ii3}<aMEem-eN1~i)+cpDTOn@W06V{DbvaO&I zv6#imHSGU8ti13fOR%;5$*|`vie3zxWwfs;HQLev+QJ_#5nJq7e6hDB{s!Mc&{#zI z@P+q#z^RKrFTD;H%@>Pp^gx(tmQnTIXNPtH^*9Gfc>TUtbd*Ig zUThH6nq>Cuq5%8?I9NT|^4xSbMi=+IPNBAQWBb+rnwdd#2$-H_yoM6Il}ulH<}6{0 zw8m{*AYP3-8LEkQlo9Pl`>e?_?1 zLcp$735!(vIHR_AwnH^lKCWCBEyD6F``R67`vzSnFvb?2mG^bhn_whFnLA}{pt9{C zM3D1xWc-?*B9Je{<-CX9r3H5pU8P8}GoCG}9gMN1M5YdG5Oj)a=Zag=x;Ge@p4zr; z23Mj4p1YZHy98XyR=rqVTYM)qrBrU!1GYcqQ-217y>k~=&Dk^0dTYF87!-?hq( z4!CM6faG+}QaM7-Q(-&t<2nPs_})9Tr%+_Z3HAw%V}iPG`P3&UxK_!O@bD`q^Zh<2YQ z2H?NfP~a869*P56;61!+XK7m|3CP;AhUA}VpEjy8d9=CyzO%!+Ie9?s-KQhp`JloX z9ynAR%wz2r3l>G!hah%kq4IbV z)iSl|-F1|Aw|M$SyS*MNd66qmOaGEzgy%k6`^TRAN7mD}VS~i{Xf)#5 z7TVu*)UPIQO?!@iDeMF)BG$nYMUL{IFT(A7X_Jc#%FoMT-sQl&V?>jbR-E+BCtnF- z6$X|BhyGED>4z!`h3-Y}BV+D=G!9WMY+oaBg8U>00D)G^X?O|@(| zXh^4rUfG)NO+C4OUJJLbg=VwiV1T5|RF$^{NSpPOuL#kItz7LYR(zMAH;~6Ff8PCb z-*Ki=p$wzSWh~ZU$}O0$yK18R_WI8N*$T@3N}dHJLvn^uBUm)8$f9ZM9R_IT?Uj(Y zOMB?DY6M7f8EYW`A6VMmtDA}bQ0iWu`Y&fGAVlnp@wQPP5`d$%5p_$kW@V72<#H0` zdTBa(1I7=~k2{B|6QvJ7=$U%QZRI2evW!}D3&_c#gzk{AA5~ntIXQLFU-K>nagN>> zqpy2^wYbjE=4PHQ*K=vgBBdHO8z-O`wJWy=4KTJS;pcbEj+8!;Na9vzA_?Y4gJ$n%=y0CsGTz>ao|k ztv3^==9M-$;HdIWsrC&70IyA#m-BzxsV;32@7Y4~hqb+*&g0bAdo&BXdA#+&F6Hc* z!d)etZ#BqyU>6Rj%rV#7J*TPXm)l=h21A~Q4Tfj~`ET~mc#9P4sl{S~P0 z-1iqhR`%E^5IMIQt>fji*=#fDa|KMmL0k28O6Lc#a*#1rwg&WpJ$me*Na@lGT=c$C zB&I@+F-zWAI%8q5wyeRc?PW;((AAa>5xS4oF{DqtBA}FTGY9%;H{uah9UiEK{>FDh z<1RNu*49f+j0_H9=i^vSal5y$>*SerfFASbO`2UJI7p6i8v@Y1A^_;16k6B!%D@40jA=)Pw-=BabdIX~%O;v2`&uc9Ka$JD-SiKYr zT07pR?r-*PpXnkn*FTm&dA_^BSqCzO_ss)7)01H!xYW_XLS@9vSLB&ZQngunP1ov6 zn*?n#!T|~N1abKN4;IfYd)7<)5=uC&-ljD&P6Uj7+w7apdn7_bu`}+3BI6I84PNoH zUc-;W#d~*W(urT$sQ#%(!honJL5{Blz)L^k9g5cNg#*SFW^x!H4U4Ve`!r`K7^OI7 z+{C51Nr`I!v6(uT9D6`QxXNt32p&q8T;1|#|KQ3MboIV;D3LM+2?jS9#-`=_rp3-w zdo~3X;pXU{JderJwdui6e*x`Fm!WUbu&(r>U7#>~SS8=45KEkF&55J><L!$4GS$O}=3flAC(j0a^3kt9d|x2= zmj`F*-2s%AbrDkszL}-&E`_QrOB9vR%wO&5zbx$I6U2e27LWJ zk+r;OZWPs?OT$3Y%S!59MO1Ss9P8SLI8(g;AD%3$dG_&sk41!RgKk|&Efek8rRF!3 zhYrF;X9S+BKxIXi;r1M3J?v~adqZAJ&OGkx+086MDv2!gJ zu4)7vLwByU;~~QlE}hd}_$tqx^M1RM(_lMw!|EmfeN=*?NE|KSZOfyG&?Vz>RzetD zhlZNxyF6Xo2CkbaPJ5uuk?t{@kyOAb5m!HGJgBoGgI_dr4P7bYVBs| zY-;;(1>D9j3F$4^G-<}fu7xtWgYGJ)s9w2Io@52r(mxpt*YR{vEOA|L#zViyQ|Ui% zgr`N7*%D<34{BN~d|p%>8sP5<=b8ZeCko>-Sw+fIFpW*ED0{F9GR3RU(I7yto1StT z7l7pa*pW7SP~u6}atMJ|9qml$Z**SqM2fEZU|1cwS)p8Bnchr~7f#%+MrN7JAwL~r znCCHr%z|c(EMFK3DJD}3AZG6i=I0u8p}fM8Z=YUqJR_*nwgi8RCE|2XF2NF69#*Tk ztMt6-bC0%y-~*XMrx>#eu()4HQGUP`eWzS?!`EfMhW$Mv=Ea{H1>daF2x z`WER&2H@@W-%qk{s~vtii0QnnT&?ICwb#2vUv}CC;3GPUxgM1yMJiJI>cc5_$|)Z1 z8a2`YUV!7I2_5yEntjhpGtl3AVd*f*l3Xg!9GM$Sd>bTqRU;!Bj3gugOF*>0U6E3d z9aDHWC}KbqwdOvl(+lK_P>8n(G>K(~^IWRKDYUnc3D%Zrhb`mjfQ8)7#6VXyLY6;3 zKI5lUT1GYu2T{FnW=kyCd7(T)e_WkHk`X+wu37Vxdi9s2qP0q4)iEXnH-~c$RghMQ*-tf=jHiO z_GTw7)FoGKmQlC&U=}=LfnG048yb5E^@WwF)#21f+ol&7ry~0pJ2SLBBu?+iFwJC z`kSqnu5IxJ+|KD;Ra9<2)`Q1%vh0w2MDb_LvE6rP15e2v!lA1Nh7c*w#o)0+>B6}Z+fU5RYW|bAsLbM@ zo2gOn*D(fu`HLq{-sh1s^dOo4_S0V&kQu3*>v6ORjlEh$CHXbCQ-r6`#j3l)abIlT zczs(>FwK)5e6E_=@$Vbq;QDckm(|l{ojyCa(Xhc}ycchmjnTIA*0l_D_X=38SFMp^ zJ933De5$)`joJPDF#8*3V`e1xU8ZvWe8hHrAV5-qDdc5aFAk31hTGiJH!L1a zaruQzG{%?ZUK<Sr(%rXVcSF2bX?$NTV5iVa}?u zvy*-ij?>$4AaicIL}6@f4sTV}AQ57V^;V{)Lv+_=zsE)GPu&q0!fHtt66}ZvINPcsY}iR?&1}daIN4hxL@R@UNwS^aI5!$ zwY=Sj!8rR&uiVlb`Kk5-QzuyAFoyb)13f#}*cucCS|6uu*s|1gXm`GERL~E-?Q+0d zgh@v&S^wz~9HGN#op)YDz-0;uaG46HW-nnI7B52ZOO(Bmi3G65rx!nzEN3$oMWHYo zRZ-|xZRqgj;)=I+p?c;Xn|9x;JpoD1huawEIJAw=>h3t_)z^Oht|mHN3~YN^u!21C zKFFSbZ^xdCOaF+gynbR6$gxnCP$`R%oUgaNi+}wdW+!iYQ}(u9v%}8_(b0L%LAxji zcfykE?`&}VVx)?Jpk;1!tC(WYM9VC{pfShe10lSoVw)RI50DPfE8E0KBG)>-R`~Zw zxppPO*S?#TkoY2$O^&`u>btKg!L&5^xfabO-UnBY@aIfeA7js?oD1jK%t_uYO;=GS za@$(C>X7w=#tNMS9`n^v!Dfdxf9g|8`9q)lu<8gLwvc{^VhPl86(3~Li|kSv8Gb8t zR31-YM>&QBmIaU)dx2wpD77A4>IX<@oJem3Lc(dE*4#j{tGPx(md;ms71GlTZIo&~yGWBh}g4vP_4g4GZF!wG*`McP}-F>QylSB>d?$586d?9aB%0t@VfV^OJYX*m|B)!Iu!cL zg(({1Z8m$1l*#rF+GT_ehuh5+lPK? zwQ06Mj#Z7R^%WjZzZq&oLx{XCRul^xXxifi)p@^bPI#ozq5ai0hW^{S!nj&rBJ#1i zW$1+8IE?cLelD>&g1MsG$_KgyqB~zf1=cHPB1+Did1`k3nyS6ZmywcRf|7KHWRi7b z9G?^*o^f>OYDx=h`Oc~M5D+UDufC(=(XH|zU8FKjLqUSlc2jHg!QOS~?;Ai!*3s`|eKPF8+1V+EwF+SaQsFo%-!1 zpgl2UsnF^uqooxm0+qAFnFlzVf>HlvdNyw85HxcqPwDj^aaX+WdQOxGEB9wytlzRSpAY0cabC6VDuaOrB#3iOU?zvRku z7Ig$^FfC9XqTHi&AaL%GwvvchlHer+h)+pZapUiNJ2)8#`ZdsB*b%w zDp(eRemn=k^OO$H6349(mB56Yl)z6N{nX-qVK1fFg9(;&f@3I%4)bADy$rDc?9oqSAB0ml% zK%R<|3$Ec5-Dbww(Ox~ps90;kwQXyMpSfq56>C@6k`~QXR7(C(7eBOt6%;B)uXvq_ z$WP@Rj!uT03(%qz*}OKXwo=ioy5|%Fj1);oUJk8WJ3j~42dQinQ5wTXUVMUQGEH^( zdNJzGn<-v>Nt|>k!T$CnrP2me9eQ4$H^^r5;2J1Wn`q|PTWyLSvD8E`y3e|S z;{r_<0FJ}Z7Zyw~*GfPAbvYJI;~%&Pk3WudTgAW$&ErRw(Ir}{*bXOBX@Sp|&$IfW z&3Jr(&oAMVb4y%%)kn&EoHGp?*Dqda`NC%2o(V_Mi<=5v1Y_tH5d{boaBbWrwq|)h zCC}F4la383vl#z?5@YDY&_h!jLEbz?iCFryUXiq8T*1UCxmTo}*%g*YYGK2+%?j-= z(Igu>05CE4D#2+u&fdAs40Wf76>m1@7t=C6rU0fsK9bf;54OekkJhYRz5S)U`<3jd zC*iq-9i@La{z8rCV1h>P21XVA)b+GW0=w#(V`0@a-&Usm_Dj5&e#x!r-Tw~1UYm+; z!#Cgj$!_#he)G*YUp2+AKm72?N8dd8#jig6^^@Oz^wDqh!sz>a${$4Eao|PLb38uBHRfBjMlX=8&`=BwIZWi(%PIL;QN17HhE*U;hRK09@w2ouJXoh zZC0H1Yg}Rpu4XMANXUBfH#!vhzr!Hzf!&9ts-IU@TDAx`wsImbLN{aZFWAw(VKt9b zB<}l^Lpm;lh(#)T6O2eE_sHHMKq2r zV-JD;-P>YUC$FS<+N94HO;?Q{NF=S824E9M3E#EdwvLA@=(5zNJny7q%b5?$&@Rx^ zmS(QAta8`14sV*tl=JnLHp^LuWo%Q8T7Phea}kC2F7>_#Crn9MxT@=_y?uE)TZZgE17&p=KWu~Qy`~%) zXBw0;OZO3y#{dRMBQ{^-Lgp6LC8_#oppEMkc!fDGP3A98hvwkAC_x&9wNn)LTlmGV zlS21{s{>`>%(l!ymMh6`yzV?2EQiYT!Mp;MLo;kPt=8-G+I(NlxET_bJq9v4~&ktcv@JA*0owcdobVX2jMhYrdBy4NlC`UDhOi9IDu`gMi3~tIxea5498wre}5h0?|nxdTaSu$ zj$OFK;%p&$7~a}q&0%t1Hm(m}u-ymZFhV9(zc>u;F<+Q#B-^xG%F{Xy-$$D7fFXOJ z4td(RGye~(r}y2|J09aC_Omkjby{yi6`c;KAl|f2j+eL(mhpu_D1%kfgL5Ba3M-2YiaZQPZVXSl*GLv@A-qW@lo!ORge(Ze3zZ9sx4XP3}$@G=*2 z0AGABx(1X0ycDAZkVDu(ryL-GAWw@Jo?w*mEwHR)?PN9}lDR zP1^uPUiON7hRZt9ey7=?f&8M7U&w&w`e}!e@QUjIT$G&Fm<{fK&>NaqFL~3A&%B>@G-w-jA3(iGvC5fObu`wr%s(q@zEoRG8YX$Va2NmT%fL_`bxi=##b-T} z8To2Jt;DAjL?L4=1X8cr0(&T{LJa*8Td`_M#-+bFZQ9MoMbv8R4^rM3nl51KV*g zaMj~zXaU9UM_v(^Bg=Vc4c0W}*IJQ@7<^|Ex8~To$!b(H4v;CzCM-;^WMfWE4*`cT zdl%QkG2F#Z55SMla@~ALFn==AVD;UxaNVjPeiLxQwY)d7pD6bf)Rh!$$YFASyeB;{Giz4fV`X)C-pKgW%d z^DaE5pFJjS;c6fYNRu4@O4cdWX^H3`$iPVb{#vo)I7vqJpdc(#{$5t3m036bg3kPB zCk4QA=O_5AXP^&F`006#BnyO-$%S@Xyyg#9BmRByN);4)(5anrDAS+UH%nYkzhX*R zG1m9aZj_jQP*;9=zl-(8$E_*Cr9z-^YtEzI*30$gYb(ZLir{GCAP0Rkmn&)Z+z~nP zz{2X1PHYLP`?e_{s^Nd$K+@I!&<(5Ju`I4{mu|qIr{t27e+pYocaK>7=8J|tPKPtp zZ8$5anp>1E9@s_4WfZ*ysOLVSK48k^mGsfq70GNq>gaI;6kb685trBGf%yS!eYy;Po=~H%y9kq?}bR3-Yqw}KoSp^!=A{!Q9 zxe#RdEwhw2?~`EC9YH)ma!u{8LEmL|nH5tM7q7}-p~GX#ayZL#r{=yzXrs3wjKIIi z-8R^ounRqg)r~aKMJKaXMWm;gTXzMlYh)6}2(ax?3Cu3M;=C?)6oy5ay!qCW+W9bVd+7AHpX;*8-BJqn)wfu--T z%g|`#h!|rF%+2^Rb0q`(3G8Q_skoE3qO5>npSYsfBCCQ1t)@PM`b zasd57wW3#+a&c+BHk(b0zN@Z`SLG9f%|RsdxHSQscM z{6e}LLra%HLEq3vc{K6s6QOw{Y7e^P!RS2S_KUpu-)5XShdY6{t0-XXi&?}C2w`o@nLPZR;#uSF4H^Zn35hAU% z8IZL})RY@45tGIO6m|1>BeH(_a7urWiIS{sRR;AyWj6@t+0T67NPInE9@ia^}`FZ_Q100960nV&Ux1gRQg>*aj1U`brI|4kgG#i zvDYA8!NY zU9{V-rdMTA$+R;QZtrh4a=K6yL;O)@)0IFkNMjQKyPsA~UGlJQU98@77TNX^*RmYe z`+Y6}R{$7r1cMz6B>ZxabY+kL&G_i(`@fueZLP;2`+~8$|M_ZK)$z?a1#edB)!eC< zq??7AGw6hCa8eKXyd?1zw|XE!6$`!(@a^1$FuZj0aTs-|T9Hv{>Q`7?prTe_N(jwu zpS#?h$SFu|CQ_sNS<%h(Tr$zQ=4=35N=YT^Jw0=32vc(#4 z_n4fGZJq{R^L{fYz)PYj|FFW(DSBc3JF&HLUgpq~y=l6#(EZOZIA$qh_V@Zt@cCJ| z0Hxbj1$iuOOdb!S{aK9gmorYKt9xkI_cBTPcl#orcDpL_aUIRgDFrB3Y$*Dm#M?={ zAKV0?u2>9XR3!@2iY`$!>%HnG@48*ni;?|7_KNDYJk~U(Z(dI50vufUVki!k2de=t zs$_rK7Q#NMk^L@O;vem8IedS->2W+|1NUPa+J>=n`s8oV=a`Blw#Gb#LhTjn=@NIE5phji=Iqmho%LxALmX_RO_XfEWv1wSppXu7?!W@XPU^Zc` zA%8XMu8?>LNpvI`zLj9STYTA6+dc`N3ba(qfB*B}{LSCU9dwg%1H+ZnW-i?t(S+yp zZ&97dLu+(|TnXjX&qm$d`2Ux``SM$`zLDHFAZ!nei86dyLwW$MB9KJZvKh8v4_C;$ zdDn_USy$Ba*4Pxjc`=cw-|TMU!J*7??p6lJl-6~MHxU(}^2RPtVX!pIBA zPsjo1MG^vP(MSVy*7I?rY;cBY&z2WAr!yaVXLO0?ISbaC~LuK3b|8 z%G!x!l+r}FXjH~p6+Dh{>{HSVbovL4^_XMGF-l9^M$R%12@S);vdYqKbIH=?CWX-) z&)OuE2p!C`^uK8rS2#sC=#W;z9Fl&mm4-!cWl)R3Ju>!?>>Z%eiM?9yEV0g7m*EeX zeM77_H7M1DoO$hE@~C_0ee{htnWA(ITO?j=$Ge&|s*L2bv(`l>B^ASKZRZGe4EN`? z=scT_ve`@_Ok=mN-8uO{q{@SFqfx4RvXV|pYQ##uVFnK}R?FE7_5APc^&d|jF+Lk7 z)GLtM8vNKz2d49!U%(IG4MWV_wy|GuS;NDcF%5NV5VJ3eW~_Q}D{eA-;&-HEOo-|6 zF*$cnr0eHY#~o=J$)&l+JZ9;!b<4kqyf2YIG0W10iP}S}QM^pxrHjccQ0WTJ>++In zlR@|TmRLP7_%E46c~(^Z2@GJ}wPg@yf=WZzXfj=90F(oSEz~9&uRS=V>ew0Q!U)>C z%*YPs)~oY{W#6?%v!H#s@^|(&A_Mfh)~AMI&Py2RLJToq)C#5NWjb5?Jl$@ zt0SyccL(33j7L+2i>%-E`ppgq;JsF(AA7r;sJHtLQ_1=uj1pWgMd|7@Bg9}5UHka1 z7DXh=M-J~7kGyV9*^d7Bw|d9u{=E+@bymXS$JnA{W~~fDwPr{dD-Nb$VO&3!MbYfq zI6SLSPai&^A|I4vQB(F>cnr$Li0AmkG6HKpFzh#x#XyL@MivY4FA0bwD!{4gaB1z< zG4+w88*PXj7QcAxy?Pb^@IzgM)XBE0LKbIf4&kd*KrnI&9O@pYHDdg8$tKP9snlI2 zkCzp68d9Skc!=qG&UK7Spfl_*uU?BW3F5%4QQ}sdZz+SPowVpt(wzETRKB{b^SIn> zF1ci_fuf)4_o)e}dh{fgh6dlDpqZx5Sa}S?(|1Aq{c*CNp&h z4=AO-Tg~`P3Am>Ut5DiW88qhtzU8dtZm7n1y#(wOW*>$LUO}-w+6?@6Y&Gg zcJ!p4Ts!brJheisS`U!!=++HM+<@-%A;=CGx$&61Q?*K#2C1_(L3!7=wwMpmgW&kj zupN4c5rky;=a&vK38oU3w<&g^0UdZwU@)|=RhjvRYt}`- zwjbu0ft7T(D{eGmXr;^BG2nl*IdSJe)7Y8u$Sw(6#bg!sZMI4-ta7pV$ExqEdFypV zW7x8DByB*Wv+Wr;|#U!!iUJ_-8#%1Q^>%mT@G`X~NZ9BEeu>ff4SrZ)6EE@*p;HeGJTn{0{yVREFJt z+bQbFk>e1V2k%19@>#Q+F_k3Q{E16@&t3*!!B90?YP($L)ro4-YjGxeV)I#XjJ$m0 z^Td^9^GnC7Y%GmDGzZi^2kZk_lnbsjf=aXY>Mn}o`*7iSIG|(XIU4wa>V*xY8Oo;4 zSwwL@I<)E-F+b8ZzGcnT30bFvkB#rHjv_zB-ll0skJz(Xy-V^e^~f5tpQPSbO?~o4 z8890o~6M*+QJI`>E~-u~h3 z4?x@(+JYXs8W&rT^XUt3e|Y=n9P8qQ<)c9sNYOGt;<+~iP>{@S0{qT$;gxVP1r!vtb7 z^(FBO@6{eV-=4q!I5K6oZ4tvf#euoYKK}VB#xh@gO&mo7Ut?IhJP|q7S`&a_OBf6QnZBM1jbY9T zaY2uU!MzxVL^ql;rzvyby7Hv-jEEK#MsztxtJi2w5dCMMpU|4=oOx!ggiEI1>l47O68bx3)v8>F_*vYD%v+b!v8VE{KU9}uTr(6Wd^znYsxeacv!QNKl zJzu?Ar}Ol(1>tD23>4XX5;U_nN?h=$S(8oEp}^7vB`!=WIY`CeJ-q^AzO3_^jCjKF zm)ndxwcobys0^UO($lsc?cddF3Tn!-cE*aPumrcF<47vDp#8f3V+)H73tqL`nw!CT zyyT%Y1BJ~|O?#sS@5;-u1M`V|dPvb@U<>bMlQW+8uOYm%pZ017x@le1ZDo8JXrGgV z;QA-!%llp{D4w^)nFNw(Bz&X&N8(G#XJiKspP!3GE&(5|6=}tmJRS)8&o!|-`cD~& z%I%*?5wdQK>IirePrZL_86eR;)x*G6ewMulCfj!1r~-|@3DoTaSW{$!OovKCId7j! zj`HMd`wI1J5(Z)A?23Mi!o{X*e%Ex$aYN3JzTVZXvpvk_%4jp3LdbraxmjeqWInFwwkr{=fTw}t)NL4C~|xoEtR z#5{ZyBl!uSUZEOn!~tYuQxXs6r3u&20y?Vjy#h#fMN_QFtfAHX)K5(M9rKLtHw1*l z+M$!4$$iQ=U-+N2uy(W8Z`zLXWnQoGZ!tCO(MsE~ETYl{9l|b^S;B+2foIQyDy9DT z#$;Q%Ni*sZE(ko}-ngvn8?w%JyDf4xzGr+clAwNaPvr^-8k_J z+bUz^n(s85q4owPjdQ~N#D?W5w!RF`;^2kUVjPinSMdHnbnMTiAG9&(gAwxMTMP|| zElH>7+4wWx8nf+^P$A_r$*63SvO3;Q<7gyPnFz8&^!C5L{Cb&!!{G@x(})b2sjKf) z`2Zb|^ZwopD_!!Jsd#N6lCKo$TZ+qonO!U>OZUh1&ilcCK!~?vXq?G;4K( zJo4i=XhstQn`sD=0DUF#m$G~&&s~yz)^w8-WeH6Q94gD3YtP9}!=PFI(Dy~Q&6qli z3^_dnJalyy6-t(OBjE?^s+gzpBRM}#fKi0lQzqBye}HFVU?X$azHG zob~b+#?K?*nqPU9acfM6-Vh$2tPzC0j|) z!FoNl2}aba4hca(=wi)tnA>^^QYf~Z6#S(t49;wVVgJPp~c znEN`Mp1zAr61n2{UK@ZmZGI=JhuYf{Tdnr8T?$?vv*yKWAn7Y@ zU)?NFbYS?uWAxU;V1I_huS-aB1?$U8KbS+#y`~IjL?xZ2QUv`ee;)p z`!_2y`bUaM;`N;8?YzHF#?e{!`;=WKj|G=s&uY9GV5L3GMNT4)yw5wM5{#UFfr{Y5 zU}%|mSiiHon8r{PAJ9}rV#Y%Dz@fT%5wFM@k$XBZ&vMA=qm|ch+E4Py{7BD~90)y0 zkKUN>8zDQRD)55VQ58ukP^2N&7#mjg>~W--f-}7`Reo9*u&3hi`c=6s-t7?q&=%hm6yA6{<3fOb4d#yPfjA01iS?5+^<0mIM(JTA~ z>FYcnbHw~LbfDuv2-Oc7&BFsEER4!0wv7svDTLPX%5;Um?a+l8ML}%#74peT;7gc6 z=F)Q7B+xOKU_n`_gqL{Ts|NdWt~&bu6oDT(HMhO?u`c*y-|HRA$RjYD$Y(QRAh)fW z>mLu*?V-sLiC*2B;JpNml?5pSWvxC$i{Z3GA9O@*E1`}0%`P+xd*P0(E{lod18fffDW8%jAyx!^J?VlM5i;=B2wOVNw9L1z< z;R&|PA2+T)OEpeQit)|zvI6Cx%hQS*KuOvW6z_1)xO#b#53so^={%?-mhBz3k( zl$R}UL+WSHntPtn8l=_ZG6s$2Vk`D^-c7;zn zyPRhHI0OHbxA@B{%6uMsRjLHRrWu3642vX)8Zs|Y{5%>5@+`yi9)n*&S+^b(8`~@j zWyww%^vZtH7&<$7o;cuvO4FIx4$P6n#Zg;uqQrJ*b}3%?kx^d%iFBSAM+yC?u^OI) znI1$QIP$LFlzlO%+o805MX!eF=K-M&Ypvf!TBG<)iTmJRb_v%H&IqZp^~^%6iijMc`IDASH7T%wjXUSPlIXD_Dxl8z75Tu@{KwSzixFxakS!YM|xZ8 z5k`tUUb&l}!x}27AY|;-8-f@lezku-rtqJ-x>40Eb&E4vH?0MiwYrg<1?$Bn#FwsP zp@1Odu@3cmGJlk3qO0mIlD39OuFq4`h{EkeTR>^HGBI*~1YSL7Rfgx0wobrF)PhIVd{XryX?VrrH z(4V3;_~PYLpoV#OCiTI;c2_sSbOvfpN5#1I4B@)#AU5Ih>M6eD#X{b_WDt(CSXp%U zeYauTz1YP{j!+V_nh|V1kjn3I%59I`L~-}xniHJ7kAQWC@mM}SJNL;zG@3i zoxcwp;4w|%W9_q-M7IQIkSVfI(eotP3kz${yE2NAGMXO@gFo#OX^IsLhb|9F5l{X0 zUXt+VxGZ9Kf{Ja1rH~XqJkn%ZNZg-fp)f2OyYhD=$yYv&oouf7XVcXrs6zYdHzBWf z{YURDLg<)TEb;=kATDv90}i99EehvZ$an0q;BV|DI2*{@a%N{ckkXy4zLo&FqxJ=< zZZJrr$$}wT+I4-IF`x1H?sAS)))8aPV14V1SBvwh+1#GSI&-QjulU0)`MRJ`k#CJB zYCOY2cbsbX93vPI-?H#`+3h-2?W+evX@lu=av8Owf_cI*MhMYQny?}cAHSnb(-I_K ziW%tox>V60zJv^>m5TT`724!Xi}ELqWnyH_x5ZxY$4X|=CKDlA)gx%!ofSvUhraMc znzgkB!kf^G?2GhS$x8pS#W1-Hz=2-7?7g>8R zyF8<^_R4-5ysP-uP%UHOIw3F2%p-#i5>*5wz~K8yP8nvkn2E|2>p#9QTs7>wx?h-a z%ko&qy?n1_eifCF9`k2v>jVEE90r9K#zyiesO8)Pq2)BsV)!a4+&${5fU;7ji2|## zs<@8TpEf47>&3%UpMp=ar0`DqPVim*hotY!0T_Sx<{)*aRqYLNm6ONwtD@J+o%Zsk z9C=6F6#Ks0_TaW1=5Xcwc&H~=-Eg3Lpv(kiTkP+*$abwQlR?+-6U*bi1V*tLYsIJ< zh)dQJnqzv|Xp7J-psK|&p?!n^V5Ty`#K_kaE9iFDXx`bONBssChRuH~@mSyf@K+3o zy|{14`&)(o&K(eObkwnTim}fbz3-dj#^K<(s2Jz)B3Y7bRaw-XI}+pjZmuE3wM7lmDQfsI8eh z;Gk=+tuF#IQg=*DY^+TVK?7&MRgpYl7H_`l%Sbe3G*hI_ck+LycZBroat^^|gC@da zzK-tn0Zjs)G`yAHDLF%5Wao2wa>r)UhWV)MQupuzA5T!=Lp#I#9P@3(9PDig=ujGZ zMz)j%TiH@T0f4KCM1uLocdR7v^A@8#*&@WCBrCiyRcHBiF(wv!C}cON*@gyY>;GXg z;V#a@2w!a3YdqG0*Ds2nIGEM}#hEdUU#wluCFQj7?#4cW0|(Lj6au`~UMRSax2R)0 z*3qWJ%@NDJ`O~aTaLNYD=P++xrj&^HmI$9GVMyxYP*DPEDYAn~&@wnAmoIv(g`%5c zV#RVkA6s~TzkJTF_>)!)n#t6DN+5X_WrGNe*q+Hd-vG}c(waF3gVaD?6csf z-WqKzYNU0dZ8pu?kRl=@i}lHvItH;5RfT7z3Ng53rkblEws70~8&I^o`QywwTP_pD zn)y)T2$~?a*B4irD2?ERc1_olU8D!%c&R$}t)c(5<${pfAPQy@+{M6y6Uh;KC7vO} z2Z(V$bd`N~L*A1fPT;tVKETqE)^K$8U=oOAxzEO~`&z{r#YP9^>OkU8%^wur0pij? zIH&sy>9x%Q$0UN#{iTA9_XvtN+3cHpgc1qAGU1`I+XtfDbro`T??lX>AOOv1O)LS) zt&pPpDkUU(PkNNoO~hviL*{Hlp|tHy>py$@!_Pm>8CcaVdm__fXr5sYb(6oYUV8x zrRVWo^j)Jghc^#@9*LS8BqlrGx z9+6v428Ji75_J^Y8cC)oXU5WQOkaGUwAUka;ex5H>(Myjx&h~%)uXw41otz;L;N;f z31JmzjnyhwTD&hW3z7f>G@TO9g8^9ULSmNz*32&@jp{!F0_NY~08}72g^r1~vo94k zP$NUC5b*W6rNF@teq)H~YbAmGY@Eqfz=zRpSWp%YBXW+nf7fxgV)kXG7mMcUF~Q+# zOH|zR%@HqAFQlm4Uh+Q(3RyMTdT(=eWa2exI^uR|cvc z>f@a&>r1b3w#$U8re_}XVt4(Mi2}8?%A2(6SN92{wxO&{!Q}>dck0hkA*6TmZo>sC zs*QLd#v!2HCPr$vDw>8dhThqTE0ezwuuK^=0R`?Mcp}GRxVdyId7neMr zqGaXSo35N#;pb&TgoO4VK=6I`#hHWR`@`=w6gv0Al`J01BR`)}UCs%3m!?>x%-%{RCCFo{3Wxtg@2k99W_tcHynin?jouUU=pRZx1Zsgq&#i|aRACntYj0;eZ7LrYY~ zv|1u=c;ZueQ_~M5K=7pDUP-(Yn4hr$z~Vx3AG%GjSmOHMCO3dvtD$4 zWriFZ$T?akP`Mg{b7N6k4Mo4R-tDg6tm|TQ24gW6@|~OdITe!c@1Q(!6X6}SyE#$_ zhN>S5)3=GW(dE26DSwh2D9RFM8z1xeia>8E%MqR^T#oBESyG*u`HlI&nw}@)j7?FJ zXq^_DW_q2ewa5xo8~!xeY?-mmHYDq6S0ES(ES1sq;?RgWGkh<5OWAfr$j$Yerl{?Y z&McYz$@cnety!-58C9(ji4D`RuS(?*abQXaV=Ob*S7YH_Sw*|;SO^L{Au27#Y`O+Y ztxA8O_6l|fc9^z+ddQy1SVWr)!pqa<%Wr>8*dc_Xa3mB>o)&{;Rt4mt?CbrgVQDu( zO$yKY={+ZV3ag$Ex{_6>QruZK66=7&IN7>F!{TmVNT{~E(RuZheG4xw=56~fj#v`J zyCV&sOP?^|n-Akp(^PgBT5k)doL89Y?c}XV5g4MaV(z3GVHf*1mhsawj!VGQ6?K9t zzJh7Pl}L_x;g%POtwoz_K6vJx;B*Nvwnlb)M0#QE=`KU|!NA?*N?;KaSEn$NoSzMHx;@k=OJR^u{LEIa^JU zLa>dtfJtf@t&IUH1|2u?=}tRB&!`FfrRy-vlFY#{iW6KS;lD4&OH=Yrr4d*R7{EoxVx~b5S+)-OJSA(9PkDLHY2XR$*tZvtNpiZCtr~md}|I5#q`@VidFbs)%Ec&E8 znDb^L(5oT(mNRKUTpv=yiH<4S^6R0j_YF8Z)-L0_j5XkHKh`_n2`$UZ;1>I}1*OqCNv*!_xkGRgL`Tt}grT zg4T%LjE|31_?VUPB;-VRXl83Lx{dCKs#V27wk_m#&l|8fy)%dAsQ+e4@)=8~1r{4G zcTS}wO~~<@R)GdthV=S}Mccs^!}gK7q;6k{&*PBaw|`gwSkd#&7H|K&v=;}GR#b}b zh%X0J^^O%pym6=t=SLa4vQzZNdKyL$M}frnIICq%kG+c{i!(p^5hJdb#qHYrJXp&i zRsjw7@n=!YbWRy7f)4f-)luErzqUi@-gca~!7$fz{t(7fvT~*a!VlngzTC?}SQZ|? zELfx(jnSF*1mrTkEZJMalcn54v6X2U>vEu46;{!}?#@-cl|?cZ^FEi)7yn3sw+aV< zVv5fN3r~F#V@0!`6U`!P=5nbFKS0?DArv`UIFWBx$Ks;!1$VJYM#B$|yO)p3v2;OO@=I?z5K%4AAa#ybBNa?I0mQPwH9#6 z{saPvZE>2Qyp;C~yCQaD8F|L!G!aXwrf*a8hho%Jc9g8^c>@&J&^nhUkS?bk zkOfzC8FznRSAy z-FxQPn{IycZZ%uf%2_2(w(Y6$AdlIXOrOkU9At4!{b1ElgQW8OC9o9`1`;=^i?DD? z@p(mar*Gz$gWj=tWIdM zRZH^PWqAStB{ISv5$1(x}jR^cIPf!%Y( zq@t+stBYNWuK{PUKeK|gu~!<03Ruk_P#N)Hwb|~gs9;JI&stBDq_PAITcx~vkONpr7QYVX004(`JL+Xq#Qa6?0bPkx@V2spghmw{1xo|v zz{cJ&`p8tQ`g@UFrxqGAk0y*=07O=;%V@_%S(Hi;I6E(wDCtew-p_)wwO7R&8FTe4 zeiagDw=Tv!4=nM62bnebfg_C1(fw5bMnJj0=8h#zzTpnV-iU!2%~14xy`{N;z4rqZ~x_A|1b5{>Gt+><#Wp{8F>nloC7o7ls(8Va8Ov zM;6A2g2A9I;RIlg`ft@@L_cOVdR0I^THnkeKlRA-i(?l7U4X$U@Tgk>&a;3Cf@}@0 z;Q%Rs@20~c7e*d?#k3>NB#?3TeN{}!E8sN*7sP10zQ2eKGO_dwbyYnCYOi6NDicuzXu#k>o|T7ZptWiz%4z9}6 zPFKjHP^Y5u+vyDxnF*Tp&E!8k^5Cs|EmICa_(su>Y(8jJmYsh9{=Z#Z; z@~o|#@!3J_#SNU*Q;zaxVm;Y*BWqZ)CQA3AD;A!Dc04HTuFn{2AGHv} zZ%J!a>djcgwQ=V8OJ#?={j)iszq+Nl?rBJ%DV{gghaF1-TgOn%~0ZhBn#W%tYlfu*)!t% zgY^Mvn}+&%pyRaM4dRxiCevE^p9HrUstDdHm?kFa1yA_FqvvHp$p=ARAW_6Y05Mx@ zFYO@L=hNRq!wM}0RjK_o>lxemKyXA@5zps*zC{*Z`Q0v71(fEmMcYChpmB(my6yvm9fV z9&>Pni4Y7LB}~9}pVLQ&3r-)MDbCZ5$1`eiHQQzg0NGYsI{eJMjCINJl0>yO4;y?&b(u7o@}$h0^!Ut&gA@_sdbdvR~Ad> z*zSv&eETea1B84!QMKp?an)(@)yq;^ac}&KQ^N8MJwE+hPmt zs$uGtMGkYR-MH*s>8r9>1M7%}+OghEjsClOy>Gf&(bo9Lx|5aAy3(^O4p}pDsj9ku z(#s%KG@f#^vVNw}r3lA|RoF@>OA_<20u2340v4l;M8B;jjCH*Lkm{{#@}1Npy}|R! z#%?xngAt+{6CC;UdYNi{mpyas@~xl#3fNd5d23@EQv6xhfNau)yDm0!hf*#ZVi~~1 zMkx|dp;5$oa={|du510nY71uI#axKB=z1Ur^%o=j*Lt-`hK$%aR%@1KmPj>&;zS7` z;(^qkCBa=;C*6u@l zxZrrolRF=%1K6}!)(>?))r4d-PdnC0iaqEW(>ZE^GmQyTdUWtA@Um9_h~T53Tv?C! z2PuRHulOa41veo_*7iAd;vKioKf22AJ>8(nagmjuY`FkVvle5~pk|8>`)YE@G&NP$ zp&y7wVlb%2iLCY<>5klR<4dHgU23Dr+g$YX=GW$F+{uV!AP4aB$48tB3X)fT@^&nJ!zQ< zGSFkUXc`V&d_`_j`vm6q_Sh%FqtH&Jc@E+>jM-qBHo5UcjiSsXm9?HR1!8DEi~fN2 zP57mhs;t`Rs^PkIU+mDC4BlpKfeY6kksl`q|6U$f{j@;|QT+az>mMQ`jN?n~L$r_Z z73_UvdJ+~ACnoH6a3YotzgRCrbrmqB;Gyf zI~I-vl8E)u!SK9z=spl@;IJS&;&e2_mQ?F55rVaivoZd?Pwj_SN|R>X6rENnmG!JH z7FR~8KUreL&u0^x&8_8on$_a4rk?{ z!r6a?;VF9qRA~qBI2b7(M8u7HEr@}Kdr?7dCU1(V42Q(elMXpq0*F8`nztfiF2HrXT6;hE`Ln_4T#o5%(CU5k#v{ROL_RvyjT2x2BM+j=sFSCVBbagl;u z4`40iAm$0Q@|MYqLp5!4p*&`y?)8U(bso(0p9mDwMy!U(;LjVNit2*9sTrXv5hKWKM`#dGLH>H>%w7j%yl*U2SS`TxgL1&Fn*LXk4 z6=lK?ly#3c#c-Ktg*VF6gM_rQ>CaWDB><5B_5_fWMN<+C;3*?4epk2KMRy;ZI!le$*u9p<aUxOtaD29Sy_U1Rg6lKRalZQRym>1lnV--)2lJ*T4yg^P5<&QpV~tf7M_Vi z>2$IQ36^>8sxM`f8un{YZ}S)UO)K1>gyT^Cf$ zd|ah+J!E?B+p_luC*UM~4vTY)dTQmx&mF*@6E!!EU|^CBc!IgO^Jngu86f!kA|F7M zw8G93(<@zr5oVxN`+OWev(9 ze+;UJcv(=c9RCd^>7S6bEW{E zU@B0S`0w*h%@`_8KH<<>EZudC^s|i}Z!ds>Oqd8o-8|W|Z-@?&U$pwA9HgKEF=V*E z?=Eb(037ODs0qmX!_=pLZkw(Lri=`ME!2xjR7Vw17Me>(MYI>8!3GR^MN5oQVCHds zzPu40HD7M&{OBi#RTZ~&1ptyw4VLF)Z(nMAS>afP1YlB3URk;dfv$?RJT=M8+Wu8G|L3(M~KRqQd*DY zW<91SsS+a8@ob2cCjt^jgEDtUEjlLWQQrVCGQ9#^M|sYSm(_ywVL?Jbaew(za4CgT zx361ZK0mSKLXe*fJy?W{bwpkbmUAnMzWoHVN3K_F_C&LUQ^RGxW_AH2c3{h=;zaYD z=rvvzi!#x#nw`1W+BvJxh8-o0DK>S5nqaPV6@Jn218gq)=ZV=e8PD>6)+zLDuAd$vvS zyI2ifze42`#Dj?_nPuyTi7mX8)pe@%L=u~|xE=b$o*6B4Er!iZ@5<#E;81;&zeJyngvz&=sr%b%C zt<#KrM8_R5cI)KO)jVbDUYiEVFtK6XA3}gmXyfp1sWDScOWLFPy zyCe-WXUtN?Zo1fI_d;Xyk_6hr@qT=)$z$RmU$&ZCbx$+ts{*Df4;_w%NI8M56hm|r zheV*C;!_?UfA8s}oVWWQw9b0d%U2nS>ci zkxB9veB1L`;9u#$?cObOglY!zXlD@hiMMrwfF}33_{$^d!9tUtO0*Gx1Efsi%^D=y z>d{f5gH19)Z8+O_+EmZXRt$6wx$?`ZZPGjKsm`*?knxB|M@*}UTflK$d&PM)jz4?e zl!dcondB77g^DSaWm38V6&0rzpwq{BF5{~t_%o zY`Yz+xHFdjv!RQ?HjDdUrqiBA=333VtC9~BQs z7QX(J$-)!R@Z3AeGg)bSA=t~%TC8P7%$G9kd7@0Vo8}Z`zG9IE`bXWq*G%81KVQc% zZiN@+nXHu3U1Kv6@j`WVZ>|V{P)ZBu)U7H5Fid?)U=fOCq*iBOr^KAggkC+TXvz_j zdSo#Vf~QB>HYW283T1Q@U31^Dl6f;N=64*t7+R-Lvq*}p; zC*Qrbw|8}mIMMR3mOYHP61f6!B+(lQ- z?3PjHMq+Ty5|TUEQ(V?05Y`cUAjz&3p>O;O(}$H!0LjYh-;+=|9Hj|??WFaP>o=E( zocLZnkgizkBaUN(@21K*Q9lp9)G)0euz@Uf7Y7G z@a)C#>UGs`C*@#_Jg`T^c`0K8c!8m)#NQYIaWNMvDrLV|?5a`2a`grms-kIVTkGgX zv0o#6iZl(2D;gJ=oRCE)ouvo#b#T{~q)4c|l_vT$OCk_-qOGKEgnM!isB)CJyOcF~ z(WG(+N+{1<*b~|*4?m#T5Q*#wne^v|Y}PCm>2(8OFVfm6oCbuY3aP=~P|9A8_r-XD zqkl>S)W4sggKmP~kTJtY+W4o=k2$n zz*LP1V}er+=jo>gK=S|nZ`FcK)wsi;%*dqiw4o(Vlcig3FQ{`-I>-KW@eAF^gnIGh z8>?QXk!mSx&5#W|Zz?0Oa_w3LI^!4}>rj|7M&wwTh``zo#*Jf6HKU zp)VmzJ_Hel8JUdY4P^JeX+r=Ep)DoA!47=k#9Q!98u1f4LgAOeyJ$Vs$+TO9Ze31TSx zzMgk7=;$b6^j;Ac-XJEE27Na*JRZ1FlRJ{$Ez<~`b4z3E5Rm=Um~hyDn=PpK(O4Jo z&df2|-esdyY7i+BHhO`EOmSlKX`yTJ>}A6jJ2=GZ8z_~z)x}+r(A5RP`1mSgPvrn> zN%ZHtGdb@EJigJwOS2w~^gS*7^AI95{00q1*aj$P=vY}a9m~YFkFR8J{BFJz~kyhqyhtqQsFA-bNy=-fDw2t&4V7%k5saZtQ&X zm-2h9&94MzP6mOQAFX&ByZ2~!Ly}^x`p%CkGsK?kmi6D1^3y=$(Ng+lHSpg~xuV%mxiFYkAVkm2l5u*rz;(dHx;qP^jfxB#ib z{zB-q_Nu1eoqfbES07W$oiNy2z$cU9Uc9qll1lv z8jZgFvm>vHpzCW;U>e%K9#dP-f!EeWZaQ5o$@}8brPb`6L2OsiX539;K6oM_ z<)q@@^IpYhx#6F8{W>hR==jAI=Phrh)+ApDnhh$?bd$VwaCR4_{vFe$S9E1L?Jb*P zAD=l7aglG+Mc#`uGhFODajxyB$iaqX4a?nD_A1I-ZR^{i-|154t#Qm<@IfA4<%a;( zs%KAr01AiIEB#S=z9@;4BQj!VOz}cqDeSJ?wfFRmIDD)6@!_@a^t=<$Y!HJw!p&;> zL*iZPS1R^$t``+n!H{5R?ZS`%@ha&!rFKqs^VY9TLmt^|vRZa(1JjJ}ZqjBu!+@$L zrtV2Oh*h!;vsaG#iym;UBkGh5FUVIGv~+9UMqAr&!Jm^Qnw(e);+BxIDyBJMwyi-| z(i`STLF?V~9PGZf5@2EmzNVB|KZr#d=2-|E6WEQ{+D#Nm5mk$9mJi^?r*Zn7H7m~Q z`?z=a^-m+CZ=TO)18O&=-D33s%zE&J%u!Ie5IN&Eo1DJz9e~?{%6@h?o@Ld<%^0%H zY8wtX6-Nu{TOzg0XmGMV!q48QgBn%JLx?oQy2k_N#(iprTR3DDGtH%CQe~)4lnbEa z2YWI*rYkl+= z{1>Y*_)iwi=#_mI2;ctU?GLGg7P6u8J8ypwTf&A}g-ClykE4ErG(>~6f9eNd$SiYs zr+DSamRZw}gnE5l#uNx;uHP7kfF_$TKAtH7qQjnx_vopz#IUB5SVUcIWk#OdiN?O^%&eN0G*69R6dnVF;1X3j~=PwG&n>B02ZweR)gd6_CPu0KXFkxLnvIB3>Dbrm2Sj zjFa_*;CQ~|>3i5F8)5_G_nKlWR#rmux+4>Kx|r3Iq%aq#U@yg+@E=RHO_@J!6_g*? z?;O+n+FFR`z{Rq!$9Qlc1dKO`%aFtPSW@d74)LmPp*9{z$#?Msmf&YHfALE#e5v~3 zXCDCPe$>?co%b!@%*HyG5ijfUXUmgtorJUrbF86Q8*1_ox$SC$Ee;)4$BN^O>MVtP_aI@A+#EqChl&O4kgCi)>iZl@}hAz6SY~lraW@#d{SBYG^|A$ z7Zkz3VzmHV+Sd=-g7nxMWZD3!!r z?3<~tl_<$gKKPT|kmxcUgNLJ$H1gD&O$@coj8(lB)OlPfCM;MuI^7BiAwi$)+YmmX z65Gf_co}w>R%23?-2fdhgd@+1%#pm*j_7kQ{D11|h82eB!HfIW=?F$>(~Dy(CkJ9* zZzoHHq0C}Phl`X|#*=3gNiscxL=LY%;LuYL%<;*>lBy-M zD@DO@+~!g4Y0T2eZul-EgBzELmmwZJ_u+T083Ux+AMgP8!M^6H|D=2oU|{0<_C?z` zZZ=tq5eTM5UF=>lLQX;;abBQi0E-sEEO?=e;D*OnoDsV z<3{R3^&<6w%p}U*vdwzf_0ZoD{o1y4yx9(GCf3Q^`NRnS7@vCAI~bwYOBW# z{Fm>Q3{wD7;z%y_SPfVqK9Q0t@eL?Em($qIr~p1H!!OJEV%`1o-AW$skyHv8{tz2` z5xS(Wy8;)X55 zY7-N444j)^j_KScVO9J#aS(>^buoQq-)E4Q&JdXd9dC$;;P*y^;Fqoq3Tq3DSgFM# zaZc9&z1pz_=Uk@(=!|No{}#7QY$ad}_FgA9fg!NBD`JfLNz;VKMf6Zf{H@1!eFZWK z?e+LubYAcle-olRKYU;h#oeW)&=!c84uANzd~!_y*r@0|AzI(z{_|~L7)*mlk^*QI z!@>R{h3Oj8ubz_1r$8}>#V-~wV-JCK6%0&Hi3ug_<;vTXwiE_lD$S99*D>ao_(Qd! zu*5CVpksgq_9c-$jq;wQ49rAe}01)X`ENLgx^XeYg5P0855jzE~U$92mUJ~rQ{~uNcSRqF|s zQPHLBR4lu-!sy&P4T~t&tt+tc(B4_=Rv<5^pf)6?nZqrcq;4saQMC!uJt@s9xZ03k z(KarvqeVds#C#wEfrcK#4_PmSsc*Wgs-LMEMNF{cu~JeSQ$tn4VT*I=tFY-rsVLs; ziZm{@W%!JEP3DTdv+W}eH=QyCetJt1Iw>1P7lrye^WimlITFk(+Ad{)JptqE!JJ-| zJM=PUXb7a{7m)`Y4zS78X_etwF0Mvv9+ZCvdW2@GwL-&)1bVfb;`-maw&g`JD?#jN zS?x9Pz}~)kXV;`uT*EBqzI4(qxspYCvo5-s1Dk<3?6tV?y7Md6;bmxHTLQrTMCH$i z(aOx`__UV$i{+7En2cd?5^X!F3B6^+=ZT%9>c|$eA==iR6^CG1D+M*fGK@naiIKqn zhZ_v$AO|1V9F9OM#WagS{>PBV~Mr4<k+}|-9PCx zjA^?hS;8<8A$%n&4?VYl$uCu?NO|0`RV~Gkays(K{H%-L#}kjynk6@_OT4gtT2(+o zT4yNY@_;u{>zA6R@gnJ$ML0dDeu2}tM9Eccqm{sWz!w$eOz_kV!P&H8fn!a%glsc% zmS$cc(@KUeJnnHkau$_86VZdrV6oPJ(xe;kfA$+OS~qg=7I_^m61ms08*d0OKf4X^ zj!u`85YQV8=n)P29j$iCx?+Ld zy)OE7ddV~ZZNJoZHBU_`TCp3uvZH}lguk`kt%F8H!Z84gt1qRjI4{`Qj1}w+b*cgq zPy#a?fm&@Xdhs>_If)Jri|iIY-_}!0kqVluC={XXx_bBeIN`mftND&RY`x`XL6;ad zd%R@Uc&w1T6hr>3ch&97@mI$^Fps+L(gvISJ5MFR!~w4>Z5=egl^in@eN8>bE{pPa z`Y(bT*p8^(J1_7G4mp2;>AZpB3_OLfSltyA1q7#4FHQG3?blkR&G- zOUb@zG*cOCYlb^k8|rHr;KRC=c%!W;ld4R2?2q+y5V{J)u)Z6T{O|$uMO_c2mYlK} zm(aBuN}SQdjVQ>QuxD)>N2<41f(F@JwK0}q`}Idhwe?+uz-k%5b^Xo4r(PV+LMUD# z8mLJq!$gl4BzSTrE`}J0Y1k`JgE$QF>_fv`5^jiNukC{gDTDf@pYWz|PT<~y*g#8d z(QJ6l28@mw4jFGeIC?i>uy8Vsdp1cr5J~m=;`)aR;%+sHNVDE^T~+W)>78gCZCg9g zOH@l`0Q1CeF|Bj)FWT7y+!~j(4RFp(&m4{CLEFi5J=XJJ4y>&u9>T;nVWt?Xnm9{X zMQmC&41v8q=W9R?vBm;=is$O>v;MW!{lN257^=zJ858A?uf?MG=;;;r1(?AgfnkRX zAxv+qWWe}9+#PsL>a4Mx#)PZ<9Jq&Izaq^!GbS&Sw!jIB&sG8;fY#l+OC}ph&Mt$)v0{ z-QLU}o!E5TvB6LClefM0E~-`~`cOHl&G>g2$y`>u+L-)FmsO~6H0gAD2L&^x?ng};5obFY3Yma_Da|T3$b>>0w=NS_MtXhtOn9uI9_158b;zv*h^rjNr!G9!)aZg+Uv4A zS+774tKbnos&65HRVb@RrOwr7Dw#`Le$uy?t|eA9`iE!u(5Zfd~inOreC2#50S&eg|HU&&Ma-E%2^H) zaM#?<$0KH8f(&J_$GQoQBe1S;qh;AR>Ob^L{Kd%A1BG6p#Ex}xX6d|JDzrKxk>ceU z4<{RwAEQ*^GsK-q3F!TAeFtNUBi=bI?s4KT|ZYTaf00030|K)wl zavaB*?yFSH;shDd;E=Yg5#=~?P@rVXLy6+$N)r9${$PIxk%>w$s zQTgSmFcY+-_>LwFrqa(RDBr0F(t4T!3tDx86OgJ6eTKCb6IPqs zM1fln_XNcZFJ4NZ+)^Pt_l77`F|T^xg~-7K+o#rNh;Apl3UECk8hU})mvAJ6%kFYQ zikd->i$*zI%*czQF^$kMM{l4?-cRVL&FN`EC9B9ml-NabpU}u_=rl!!1ut==j~~_N z3V#tv-&p{}2xgSOlVbDHU*(p?KfUkX)Qtye0~MkXHPc?r?%QWZ<2E1C)B{JCy=F5~ zs9gb)$MwqyvY=G2Yh46a&tF&~F>oTr7+@7S0My;>|H8KEJGx=?iSq(S6(znb4-xF} zh(7&?rWQF?nB)D>1xz%W0Q45u+qO)FnroNrA& zs2o2!eX1XymPQzLjpieOX?%5AE9OA2s^XAn; zP5ZoYIIwGxy>Ryl_!gHCENLV0p7MN3WO>98<@dJ5Hd3s-_)oV%yPqcS`KC9JM1X{y zHj)R&v0a#QgwBphM(=Hg`7ns=N@2`{nFR^$eCKwOD;!E_=-j&Z;Rhexo@G2qV86@h zL^GOC`CeR*;^1);ifn=)C$t$y&@W9*V*5&`K@H3@{s>kbID72=;dY+r9I|$IQx&}C zQ*6T-Bj8G}YdDjWua`cnP!AWymb?%n?YZ)ygQ2f^FRvS1`VpMQika`jYy zw6Mb|lVw)}o$3;N09e)Dh{&ljL;ST+2yeO-g5ZsDO9$Mwh~GTg%_){U)+~_6c_Fis zXNJxV-l9WY;K{Q%KMhNk1NdWfc)x}?{hQu1u;y1ar8nyWZ96gmr>{M4pBO=h6Zb!x z=0M6GNEegEAC#wawMe0jm6_%7lNd!= zr&an^NHW&I8) zmJ9m`xF>5%0jY}m=*H)AjOlne1$XZieK7n|n`N00$MQ=eNSf%LlAu!Iu_uw=dnAA@ zj!qVgGh2^zjlhy+%*;^s5SG<`Ny&gdldEqOO+C`xZkPF=7VI&VCJg}%@5$resrBW> ze|r>v5KfDfAmfrC8t=%oU%lqC7-s15zmgV z%@RsP>8}2>b^$-zG)YRjXZq>MyLLs*qDZnvIU5vH6vnT!zzUm|GsIl%QY@plfwEW6 z86--5=VviKBS^TUN#Cp54D~n@5z$k7Dsqg88VVjSm9n#-67aF06o^+WyxDNEGOGOc zL9=`H?fA^=o?iNVA~%9aO3NpY1ZsTd*3%-^?n!-byR&N3U;HhY&IxBM^cD}N4e>B> zWACdVny)^9H84y?n%Pcv>t}cGefT=|V{f`%9>Ar{{kkvbwwk9&#!Jt}A!!_BrzRhS zy-mJ`q1VV$z;U&fYbDEGt9?*r7OQlAwQq}^uAa7UirxbrxEzjs7PwvmhJ)RxrO%LV z3y0BxM|SlEU)GMmwIbP*Jh@|@bD*{@tTbzcyH7aQky)d*a?qbpREztAhRa}@sna|} z4C=L(_0+eb4!AaeYp5o1XaAk(V^mEGy|#u8(y0C6N*FjTc0zHyILF|ge1N1gQZ?cd z{xJFoE~pPAI?xs95Equrmq<>I9FSYHHDHGh+-$~Z27+-+03d^P3_QsaDYrFYvPqUr zIjW$p9jpGY&gJaX`Yvc{r(A5(8Z>$Co{dopR5R)Ok3j~9)oS?duqgU<_UX`jioGZc~Huc;UP-(CFk*PLzF?5NRlD}+=HPRVI(Mw_q<)+#UAb}-+ z`p2#)FOpyvqMPt+s8^*2GrB@x=+j>H7YnGzBpF#mmmRg0vXx8nsne(eHlGa;zsRUF zfVtxW>e?L*8>SA4v^Ty&2$ZR=_ct05nxmN-ZixS(`Xe{zp+iD@+=N z+L@0Ews*BGDRAL7JQ*(jx>^&^R8%d37>n0)NxVu-v9Ws&q)5GZLQ9JQaEw?9i(yj> zF>PQQDz>6wiLI?UEYHD_p000o5i}0{s?C~ozfvM?jw6$+`X7HB7C5Du`)9mIijEeg zN9PJWCX7?V?c#f~Wg7F&VM`5$RSOnNPCe?Jh4lVTHC!# zUcMFA=m~#;Y#BkShs#JC_kXAfg0WYiI)0$|Nrm(Vr=& zJ?M_hAUX5zw^mxg^#N$p%Qm$qIR=CQgA_QV}Mz!m2<@~Ijd zQ5jJr5^?opH_r_Dz{9+VQUpVUkkoclFD?P(EJ$8gH^3|^+eg!L8aAOcWOY#WO{1qX(=Y8QY?b_%(HN{l zRusJiu#xmDFU~hZNs_47o%Zebshybao5Ex#5bI8ZFE$Jgaa-lqKfN~J91Zi-KgAiD zq!Yq>#(8_9RO4rN?|yijAu)_I;}4;v%c)*=43;59-_g7nqFOB*SlHBX#6d>brO7*S zs?apQW3Pab!A6>*mzaI7jA4;*ae##|47i2KZVj~~%i(k;Ko{VaW@9u@ZLY%@;;KbQ zD?`XyY45~Hhk~_6(W4w2W^^o$fnHZ%tgH|(shv=-NOJX%yp^7`vrG}MMaf+s)_%_0 z;J+AIIi}pR6MvlaxSNDZ6_EnE_%Cu>QpL%?XABxK(8a-`^F;BMzQ~)S$RLfC&1euq zs@|lKwN#7uM2X#F@#mpu>5mVE#NUZt_t+b@yp7B8keCFq~dS_$}wD| zViVewcvQOKByQK*9e=z_q|SnOTAHIxXT^*f4s#O5_I4xNFIGh&Lml)Y1=|~t#VnmW zkSc&zv=tiy6V2$SX<1f5JX_sN($!it*%CGRcdTLI?qgf@!a43BmHy6Mpp_XW=gv6* z>9TdwWXj^M!9$Cw#u1U*1$4)TC;IYrkMJKd6Nm-L?2PqN_LfnIFMyh>b7TwN#f<}6CF zH(l?4V#oX+CbDRci%i{#W0LI7EP(qe<|GR4QY2Ge19{=9(3o-wT>cq+22ZzM6l6)8 zqE(4>un66ze+4FDe>=x}v$=IKb<`C`De+g6o-3&8$hcJ1m&Z;gX_iY;Dc;}X zI07?p03uY50-3O+OHIY>1;tIUe$iI5e95Q(OzYBQH!Y%G%wjLZ7DZyuCWR9RFFF5X z@gIH%F{$2Td!b_%S|cVgl8tmv@i)dD((CL2you6Ct|nJiHOSvOFCxk#mL!*Y>)!nj z@7`4e@N&Ha zH4-&|W?uSKss2)t(S*fKzALZLw2RjI?vud8(%EsOyY!&!xx;lEYOVCRgi*I0c;>P{ zjIHIR1N4WA@4`=VTN|(8kH!03>@0omC#EW5U#!h0iVZY92))D53nc|cw=Rlh5opy+ zEts0Cb!zfPyP3sCBl|Y@RqQ6&MW$^nd2Z)LsedDq(;NR4nuyp|8kpWZfP`VM($|gK z_EFd|**MXQoS5Rymc#=J9sbTo`;gtGjwy*ERTJQ#7LH9MN;&eRQeO9S!)qiguQaHX?am_jtC&wzWqtAleFh zSmT>;98mHPr`La=UHuq#012D6sn}|bRe8cfA+a7znSx!p+j4s;KVSb5rECU7erZcX zDq3cK=1ziAhQb%;uEtu~q~hOt#`@KluoD0&3{iWjNZZfj0ff2J z%Cn&pgElg5mgC%SKk~I>)ogKTGxLtDlI%pffy#k-N2xgh-wdmC1-W%fkSH7Ij5jg* z#~+7nnxt6rmhe=dh-KWqUKeFU#!_POM|F?75XY0|8+%MH4{9l*Kwf<+ffmXtc8+%! z3Hhy+nJ7*aVhE;r#X^Z-;m-f2r)>Yr0y-fj`2eU7e zH=|~WJ6MzHn>}gAdOdD0xl2a}%~igX4=hspx~a$ESTzWP?havsat#s~?$~h=6DPR3 z)ahm%H8UTHZ|#xu>^>b-2XyK`+6hgyWniSjs#K0*3<~kz21Qn-lF?^#OO@L_>Rg9h1 zpCqY|EonM30#KRNqNq)tYsr`tKpWy^}N^7~xqS+$0; zV@ql@^}>j+DaqS%YnL$Re5UVI$J~`LgK&Z*k?!J-8QEuuKlly6YXUxwK{Q2X$`wGR z>q^~BNz`{M61}o>ToA&|Bb7{co#{#LH%**|9J}6X7a6}Dnj&r_kBeNAAh3hV4^WML z1AHaTwr}iAY}>YN+qSi1PHY8GGbIv{YeCK=j-QTPI+g;sV>tEHo z*6LboudZIDF_S}E#q-;lW64tD%ETE|bcRNTKubgQq@(!flI310`do<;QZo53m#mq( zuFa^P&d05@3|E}XmrIYknh4Wt(^E4RxJ#i_Je8?xu(^4z)LDN=SU(=b2)oXL`Ei%Uy&WO7T ztcIfPro;O=RSXE9TXYJa6v>%^u0Ve+jeKX<8%IM?#af**{qc%V(uHpV*G&htOI3o3 zj5c=%4w5$#wCj#7J<8%_XlQ|T2?hbHS~uF*VmQG@u12w1O9kKN?uaWQ+mOUUD~JAz zANX-e7F0$mwEYzn{2YpH5^;p^i)Jz@znFooZ4?AJtU6uU`TAM`?c%-@(yf@vMxV)$ z9<5SMqER&5%95M}y5&M#!jgX<>di-cop3z+qd>b3g#S8`-l*rr_W8$N^F@tfqv;Nk zFv|t4=d;H+zc|t0gAzsK=Y-Ay;#E72?dO<`e&co-FB^h4hDNJ)1N0{OIL6Um7YVRR z1w1|pN`%@ACll3S8hc`VuHfdvT?otm66vtkG)XNb5lX^9U~?0q?(Z78V*+#A&X~JbZeo$ zpg@xAZ&N#va^FnWBP`O$jZIg0VAX))}8HDcJM5y*$v?Y>G}#+t?@!cl5mJHL7ed8i^n@0* zXWmUz_!U;%3A*2wHF!HI;`}*KI6|l8V{>O@Upa;iRG7V97cp)>as@p4En-#e%mlj`+$!o>&aB8Qg-16WcKFMxMon9YIdGaK@@}2E zZLU3RhVE9nk#rG`0}Viv52fLWwM{h-42dkFNAcv}@Qvw%r7Py(zNYUuC$jg8*X_sA zUgG7LDOxd-$*<_uvSau|c;(Jk4iwcGi*Tto|KvgV_!TO8g_(B}n@F87gakYK{B?7H zFNBn+-MkE@7#>9oSprwFJr!SzR4;4ajA%_%OAo4{>PYj0&S9*CKAP}UFI7p}r;nkn z07wiKJd$8<8Mi5Go+Wz%`eY!jx6f`sc!%YMR@S7vi?N~fwiKz4#PPP3kzK_G99GPv zd}F9DtaA@ZjfvWBC3|`SLjX6CXDzKnw;u&?^tg33O5V~><1>#0xsXyC4oYBOuwr&w zw{FZei}}P^Ex!8wVrq8SF5e>cjxf5^;~NVMp&FNP*H*G#VJP>8S3b2RgC5+hx3<*= zif0=u$DTN(6^9{6&IUo#q87sLl@UiY*xg>38h7o2w?GeH)Q@pJvtiKV+W?jnpWj#z zOdu`4V+vSpM%0__pA0DajY~p)1%0*pso7ceEj6RT!Ylk0BJjRQ8lF^59q}}(=k@Wm z)+e^3XzcA}aGRx(jo%6Sy#7|c*Z1*3*-3TivAJwil!&C2U2QUOq8~*g2Dxn)ZBcKJ zWIZGL6$kj-DqZMw>@{UvBFeY+1r+;CH=_rPzy5LzU^wQ{>z^)`kT(53$PCkM@Twfy96+_@*Tii}aPzwh=&yyNV zt`Bd%P9AYY$r-3*gm5pnF?_LD6#(Kv(hW8G8jOZ2&ceY~gqq<&$F*Bj@`OeyTCN0r z-iQRg8n`SH6}6ey3V*pJUNamRF*p&9?Pzq7&uUUX&7KEk@59XT>_Od@X+BW$0P_-MdjYPtsK6~iGjEyKcK<|{b2&V(z7S|apEy2@!3Dv?PJ$5@HsPl*111PtHM~O&A z-ceQ@m-L2d4k=t<;x{uCPeMV#Nf0&Cd-%nW$I|f+L0mY#5dbV%DknbGN@)Z|&pHzQ zgSQ1ym6*|vGapBE$Rvp&wMC)s7`o+92dM_;`T5KnIyXD#1^rW!p6Qyff5?aZ29(RP zn4w3d-bXvo^`_ZOHckhF5dyGaw+{uKLg0V{YN|ora67V%ol51HUALQ4MmZd}t_>_1 z7m5ZURl3D~Ux z!3SF?PSf!g#w?O0T*~`tOLMedIS+cdgOg;cRhmI!x8e__p*wVDYu%3fwLAsw)U;Qv z2_wV^dP;{S)qHpkI`Id!uWC+aa`)eb4rw$Cv>H(|EeS&A@9AXRw|SwJavE*}i>Mfw z9s1zn2bY{vicCK$w;?(B%9r~j9W%bzWw`7W#${jgq%4emGwkkNo&Q`@q7+Hj& zt`m*fUV=M^y1*1k+{XX;5NNfO-mpq8(<2R2=n7!hC=mly#yWn=S6o~3s)_ON6DPd4cQ{l$btNBM)k$3Wi~dM}SixH!n*;s3_8}_lk(Xv*?#%4DyPYGO z6|dlic&4Q8br`?4X1d-Ohe(pzl%OPK*s^d&*ma3kyI6Jgrv0i@2`B z>L3tbx^Ye^bvab-rCnda^<)(^MDa9@$7o#u=i_57v=cUa|#+o1!FGH8ON}U z9z1{6(VUbm=&>YWwt7=;BDZ!1oLhuWojHKBSC!%Nvpy^stoJb^VgR51s`Xb>6VE1%z_-(Mcg`fPEO#~;!Ry$AEDvV z-5rucC`&hS0aB>hs&LpG+4_#_8099)vb6D?s=frm?=C5`QGj3IFqcLYgg3{|zWa?E zALAI1e=X%1K+SJBggA)YGPF3#Dny>L80t9nm=}GTYE^_*oHxJV%c>N%?<+h^gm%s( zGlHnN)`tL-(qIm^;}Ptu=#_Ux=19jR5;}J}A5Wn}*&P7jO6JB0XtsCS4qP%VhR&`y z=$zjTr5%q8w#z3Z`YzYZ(d~Q&S4lxmJThi-p;s=zPts$!gVOQOr_9qvX7*gBUl^8d zm**SVvJg$a*Ug6w`@M860NRrEHd|uyY8A#v>dea(`xb~|VXs8a)vV}7(17Dw(=MgK zme8)&XFIqK&A8&U>S!>{_sg2nd!og{yUQH=wzQRz`gbq=87MIxAuho7a&qLrdx*9y zVF0omJ+S~q2MVhd(=Z-6k!t#ac5u;M=h7n>l|vhLGXV6rhZlys$9`Ls945e^pPipi ziV}020b1m=v=DU{9Ya8nG7W&_rr+Yn$!@eUnjYH*@?G=^CxoWD1za5~=_MGOF-ps? z(Sw+N$MkjnW`o$8Es&mO*J_%ddzL)*)I?-adt}AfeqT(Rxr>S z+%JyyZDJWaElTBYcd?QH-s{O5;a86u49gB(wrJ1-B9j=ZL&$aVh~Td6a9f_Nm1ebXbns(ysZdt>7zCK!?hO!IDWw^yuJQVy`& zSkWX!k`}N`Pq$Z|$l?R@Ay?B@W@ z80}5qqq>U_PGy|?abIa4M@YsPZYQejsJXXGg=m2yWnyb?v@uM@LuqsjOZL1nNFxr? zFhMZ3UvZY+8T)iNQrKWYgGKS6nY|IaU6J^_qam*O#Ic45P2h$a#c4Yp)mj_)U@|Ck zHiRHTFstyYxpH=6EWk4n04}RG!Ah#ni9aD2^R7BxE97jlKajrDYu^tJ?KQE|#-ej4 z#}JvE_B4LzMU19m7qBbFLwoJgyIY4kJ2I(`dUTr4E5|#9qCvpmLF4cyU!ju*I9p!>Sba)y! z=`cwDgGsS2u71y8hH)oPW(Vv+%uL(o95fP~k*U?SLI@kDzSwAU$-)3ac+jNe zN6!#umfQvT{*mC!3sb;Lz>WkKD0G`bssxKems9`k>`???8PgZF9i&S3Gnh|8J&>yy zhYcWkz?6_#Q=v@tIb!^@5}r+qv^Ex6+NwY?9E0*@^gQ&1cjXuO0_b%ag6LF8<_axH zMP|3VT8N?ZF_2P(e8n~#%Y@R8dUoBi>n>$u<4R;^edh3ZJ`Ky>W7TK5R%vaP^LMpZ z2DBjZ2>YGq$Xl#g4y(ZldLEGDXAkr=b0f19B_Wlz}=qBSyUu0(IQW)rWr`?tUw-UAu!+F7u_S& zH*@P?&fC@V#ybJ~Gl|vu8sMAcFCtqeHWjF2K5Y;OT(=fQM7%$o2ilyW1bV8$-||hH6a|WP(3kFlzv{|(uC6_#B)8G zm0f{xD1%+?VIW3&htwYjvb`hMHJKN#odJfF5Zi*pQ@t`}Q~KiYI6$b#-M^xxI*(dE zNY23f3Z1zg)<}WhMyj*W|LL)NmkUe|qm9Jd$WiKu#!4V?JaC5Lzxr^U_C85Pq)^2) zQqn7#=9bUbR1jG269#d)g@_hd-%o99G*XeiaA_ua3>GK=WlhTufmIZExYQ_`QGLpU zZqhPJUhs3pP?%XYUDs>KbV0XBvMPahSD~tv zv5fll)BTdLiSWkKYCXjgaDPJWM>5DP<4?s9HF=~#tLHYn^;LlXV?NMP*n{+Qr}i^? zaK6IW7=pQruM#!zO4UFK8hR*HLb^-c6+~YgLI*FU87{|>ndUAlytI^tQOOwQ_v2>C zjif~f7L(4Ok%oDr_S6%eedcgaMW9xKt1YUMnNm=nGepqD{XN*=-6~8|jixlE}_ROy?NYp>a0bCtR^ zcVA4B(QrycO&4A!UKtyuC5y9D80OD+7RI-Fsn2@Z&E`UY z(Xek+G|7_T#xN6Q)vqv|QyZBbxGwrCm}%=tpJ^md&04c_aJnTg9;GZmo8VyF=T3Js z#Nppi`w{lg48iZo+iuhtZun8J3`^3c@~!4*lq~hik&0wxRE1bVX2b0%J(~FKT1fq# zDNWYC`iR{uwa#|6nM;I-aji+X#JsUpA_-3$0SyRPmCm_TDY8fBqZaGi7nc^ckDo`! z?n}yF@4r7DSlxX3+Ch>Civ}7`P3Lb1uWeKLn%^2|<%P_qE;goghtO`ak+7(Lq9-6a zU<5nIK&Mo&)fl3SCU5Nj05d>TtC~@U14r`3>K`wffuCHCx;Y#4thUMi6XxeVM!BT! zAP2JZ24|m0c6;2SLY47-l9_=&+w$(o(xyXmQ;F?t*`5tRcp-5W;Fym8bY#Hk8uewS zjb~L#1p5@Mde2@I)F0Vv$V3uI9(k<3o-udfwu17`L-fAgYOo>w3(QA%c2RakNz9fE zjZi!EZVblZ{vg6l&V!u#geum4%hG~GT&7VHU)jn#(;e7#!X7ELb-jB;XAPrIr?>Y| zjQu!ezVbIV!kl(OH@WzuiJQy2G6_HgBI-U8mgN$pTc-r~owJ`bS8Ae`G1^Uo$^n8^ zGPjC8t%b6UW%4i`G#}7b(|8lMegeVyebD{3Kg<)9a4TAc*k#<(6H=2KG&4vCPGBFw zR5Kbi3QMiW%kwOt-QvWaP5Y)pO$f5InV&@`i)GzvCe~i5|B6;iMM4hkN4mB$H)%Kd zc~3s1WSm5n`I=`eUkpwIV)$kVPf7Cpj?j4Lh@Yl1e>jahbK8$Lf6{haSc4L;4$~*0 z6f6ytV|haiXMs11L!VU(lAJNGU}g<-%Jq_gx>#NZ>>aen(lw#(W4}7AGF1H)O31rD zEn^XpKGjFguqL6S=e^fgnJ8c}+y@pi^6B277f_!XB1+6hu*lkkR)qOgTn0N$8G5yP_AK< z;XR%4$b^H}dTl;ORTYa3u6pLPzJgu6pb-b*5`i+6d9=DSzMEB%_d~Opb}JljlcyOR zE4@=pK|`FxF(6;G-Q2D18&Km%ea72%G7RxBE?;!lEBGQ;aIlh9x%TKGl2s2)90Ye% zw&OIM7JJlo%%>38f(et_&t=kY?;F-?1*?3h{Ola>E8910ABLqaLkWpPE}-KdB6+|) zO<7H#si?{x=QE!IjE2vCxg(rKkvnKob2Srmuq(A_*sQpLkMmn|#*s3L^OJMyJ4G=+ z`6hjFrkL+i-J)ubYElp*VZgPk;LTd!O&*Heh$JKhD(uqqF}?ocE+Et5yP=b~-5Vgk zADez>vA31Q=C!;x+H4$p<#6Yg5z14vPI%s)#3fnY z@q^+s0CbZS`~>nDsVsA74NU_I2J;&KOAOU)EY&31DS{Fg&?T=z&Nc!V;^40+Mc5xr zjL0y`Vad;T6=oNA=no8|Npe``zaM?Y#3;^Ckk@{f%LI0m=}tTGinyt`MHgYrkBCLm~&}np%f7_Pvf! z>@~eTzABu%P0H+fh;eq8>E$|GCv=$R;|+#NzPMfp!5f}nx}IkM=mSv6HY*yV4@`Ki z^W+f;f;Uk6+T1y({cZh?sitPEge%IniWLf3ui8C?!v}?(+>hmN!o!g>Tku&Ag>0#y zsRYaRf(#ErMv-Dn0|_h7-rT``-D5J1xDzLrn~M{^9;fH4KAc1m7#|sOS5q$-w7C6N zT4--{5|~@%fO794z68cBG)Ys!o;Pc0B{iiyp$*NNPM=gbF5*EY9&TT6kZEgnfYtH# zs-;GUQl&B)Ja|6>LfawD(2}YMDQ)oQMM?fXcI|u=oGfj^l9bG<%wb{fXeC07AyL9m z*d$3AR7BezA zUHbRQPYvepol&W>K$cB4O%dQFazVaBeCy##gW77HVY$#>PcSab6ciLtQUtf|=le7Nosd5F+#Q@v8C=W&04sY7 z7kUpn+u}q8g?>i3!3&>AYWGz8pAJp-*kKW%*_gt62gT>u2?J_-HPH$R&C1mv5##nw zTi#Er>gG`jHi>x8d87NrywYNU@=E!e>=?Bti~Bi}AVD-g;`?<^nZgHOjhD=UGYV-) zufQ=H*fG#ta-^_SL(u!etpQ3jqdGg9&(*f07)=x*L<41P&WR-)bAfKg__?pd4N_TW zKYkepebvYmtFpO;!5h9W(GbRu22Y*A)bBqCDL*G^IrgOx>A!8Qr2+hKs?oRDHnb>{ z-}A<;mZ4g50d$vMluckOjxjwC#Lv1g=ae6(ox@7FE`=4jIM^ z|Hj#kPwXF*8Q?I>CpA3Z1bKHQIAIEzlmq-82Ro$5^MlqiKp=@K>}4Nw5RJ<(kmTKx z=Mf2nAtS77S@fjPNaDgE2DW)vVo}l?E0c~M1HR}zn{_Y$R|RQ z&qpjWx~u&opVU*_M64VIdsCKDXmVWjh&O+`+kTsYvi=JIrePs{hD6(|$FC)@m`0K4 zYIlvEC_ltyF_CG!3+Gf$EC1eG%Lued^=wGNR;1k^`C*H#?1HLF<|7nx#9BND znijwEMoya}(cZ)R6@La4{OxhZ-M^4Y0v=bq>P5)9JY7b9u4x3Z;X)7%Bqc?L%g~$` z%=?T=wF{0JHN|lQV5LRUX2S6azECiQ{EUM%dX_8JpuZ=5#GyUN=Cow5YMEt?BRrPF zBkfa{FR3G)VBf`p3EUAaruIk%ADNc3_8aWY1)QB$=68*lJ~DTlMQLTwSdW#D!<(|2 zm2mYG6>!GOG_X54oQql2dH~&T)IKTKuw+Ne%!eeutg$M8u5`1JO$J_#`HMy3!VZ4| zbCZm-o3jtDp0_^DLx*t)g8N2`HHwr2mh#m}_$ zoY&bA{Vu3DeU82(d=ZmsM&pnkQag#Tz@}&fJHZgY3KS$lz2IUF%{_~us6{! zEcjrwbL-v3LLnNwrp0kyx1=P=I|Y_Cj)4!0$DWIVa8k45+EVHtBD5rQ)Wk$8`pO?G zpVtE=#Y_U6U}G0;7qT^Y7swoI4(tJYzf#+)k?ZNd!xafiwLtRmV}AHn>Z8qA6~@N( zYp}$~N;eV9M83CpHPwNseUP=Mlvof92@wOhkcs!$kub6ix010!^qGvjqM>gAm}Bo! zNBLRV)j3n?%nl38kedKfM3^q)1SyJA3V1j@^J;dkuI~o!yOAezn_2)j>Upq71Z5Lx1Z*}y`} za@&Op8-LqvY7bC&bTOi-A?d-ji_Z|?;Ms{OG<%JUV2(d&9knyN+6@^E4uExh!^fMUOJER~Hio+r2I%xt6%(0+N?pWr{$6 zWj}HkmC|dB-(bfGFD4>p%8&^5|BUIw!>XM z9yvSkoX(pDR((S`(-_YdneejlfaZlrN`iixtX+hbue+V!=dzVR`=yBbg?n<_4gfrS zWFb3@DiB{VE3Fk7{L8^Woczo=st(WVkS=>~AUYj@d{(|VIzWee?|eY)s8CiP6+pOC z*X*Va71|msCw#yak|B#O3{8E$N||H|y>4?Gfi6sSY_fxDp)8`_NM?2ah`{Eui+@i`L z`FxpRoPtF!THd~J!fm?)yHuGLo%R5qUAyQ`ea>+CC~a<)M?8aT)+`eQGD!KW657RA zsMB}GuwT9gE-f?3cacRSmZdZ2qgDv&2q0T1=Zk>GV_1AdKmcjz(fvB?QxElx0% zq*cH8-<1`f^BP`rl?DbJq@wz-zhkaR&aYj*Org6(BrQ-kaVe`ZrmU6th}Nq(xx_gE zbiDF8^DNskHp=0IR9RJt%1hF-n=(yo=#;rRF!9w63zu25}nlJVrS^frb?o4XOa3 zl^c6`h-`AZNA3cvZ%kBL>8^*39uVl1koXH9YmGv0&TlF_7;8o3X*^U{n#via(Y4(#=*gcJErM6EEnQw9( zYtc*e%2joXJ<=<{w>k4p87+%%TDHcI(`=k~ zB;7)kqM!Z}CF>gU{Ed7F{l!iS??CXvIhSdLW^t=4msJc%b!naM-67av+3K!SMERpz zxX;<-y}96fmKA(^2E; zO-9uX9%!os<8K0@GQ)HMK~8x_h|;n&Hh*|lSxW8eT<01+YeO2TTSXK zn1j?NCJOVt6$Cp~8aR^9WEf|!_fcv>x*Vb*XVsH>?++axdJu&Qg@f35G!5m^9eh+X z2j3OlGR9VKn{FtQ+SVJ1S88 z9teb|?9 z<@49uUmP@9>Rt=mmR0l{YkE3oTdUElcyn~DKYIKB!KYiH(m2ac12Yi(|BFxdu6D*| z&Yx!fA3mLJuG<%?qeASw@P~vfjDxXT==_YPR!f+Rs!+DT2QslO>>JwKk+pwO_O0p` z=D_5+8qnWl4`V#)=`(5!@UP$Z0gmu_ex-{g?;xD)3!X-EtEEZ`co}8>b<%cyH~urH z@^iJcpE3;69*i3LfwE7pm-D5ESPXk&@sVfb#u&U=eA6j%-yAF|GM};t?;BoBaU7YN zrRP@02jh;ledXu&+2vjd$3@L>%iBv*N zCt=%~?}_%D^(SG9146Y8WVc@Pxwh!`yR`i^0{qe#0d_1q85&*aw%f}qT|dDgd+w<2 znuBqt)fVvP!F{h%PJN|xVy6g1@T!&0|!Imf4P3H2> zMUVMT(Dq3SdApzqomh@Zp1gIR)UzYit3U zPZ&|qSwU7r_r2)Y2-OEOmh)t<1qc6O?udJ;ve6+7@wJ-d*uk5KW z9J;>@t3RBozl^ItT&llJt3TYTU;bdyuMJB13hnBW;E!%~O^!JOe2&)&_5a(Ljq<5m zbwob(s+m2&K-JUH%ti0dpxu-*ZXd*mDE9CMGtdk|p{J@QmMBIr&K`9Oipzr7@<`+@ znbdQEsf>;kQX<76>2dJQn{R|%=TsHVuGiD*miAjo5+?|qEWImN)VBKcs9tBffmvl2 zIDt~_eWOQ^jKQEg2rsJP`JXNi5dnVJlHo5G$&Y1F2cFmKqEFJwkt2D^FJ zpj0i~0@xDHm}1gnCBqIycgqWxK_X>v(fNyAa~LknVV0wK-Hu{e9A(RZv4kjISX zgcgbvse(I-!fAk+gqc#D%z}83a3z|=B1G|c5xs`8yc4c-uA79_q)v6SFU$q zLF}n{B5|QJP1->ui~AygBa!gRXtth!CyYN#Gj*`92Yf18rca|tQ3ejn6;gfBb3xnM@r_6rCL$T^LLpod01T{T<#cmD8g430M7uBmM`r;`8i(!;Ksr z{|La}(Ys4P0coG8tIzKrnfZ4T1N{ry#MK4hVD~>&u1aw|Ep;Krv&-2 dgZ)oqkfIFuCtHAk;66V7 zbMmBZ5Cekf%NNv8s3@phM_C0GNfcj-O;HK{UK(M2Bz{8}&vy?nNm<209E(8^2(!~o zeT+WKdKr;=z{A2B3l>=r1puuK*%MI=pIPmlFpB#T*I~$foS4?1d1G(p3>(^4|IlXn zLDB*rx@Zv~B-6YKwX9N|NUrINf$w9)0FRc!WU5#%;wb8zFM1*c){(kHaJK^e5 zFBowat1G=Mi$nMYH;VM)D9MY00G&uJX0LBR!tOQMXL)s zHB#$#8i|lx3nN%MuqtrDoEri^kC$MZB|F%PmLKdF-aZR0qPNE{)+J^qwrKIuP14Ga4B3T%HPDG9tH=6<%3$7~e7PpIC@XEZ!HMu=2M zxdsru9q6|@pG_M!d9~JKo{Yz<0qGqJ?Oc=+Y-CucjGf03B!hZxB$cprf_%DCh z{_+R$KNGieH2G)R#qqrIe+d-o<|~>+s$@tmsA58T4sZd2gd|G9HrZ36dI-NB%JPG^ zT1**eYt7d^%gdLWxhx1bPOeVgWZBrzrvVgcL8rWHN}uV{Glg_oe&9R@wP6jETHTQu ziaF2}LS6~0PTxl=ScGFxBI~w;9T;cC9k+xU@QZNElDZte_&Pq{THZ?lbp)EEUrCNv zRNTPU)abqX$XYc6o?8Ua3<4}JuS?iOp#b`_U&^hSkc?k~^3!;a$`j7)eQyXR_E0_A zMP%@k)YHq`Jyw1?gsUb}aDz1qk^U2a0xuo(q8V0nZ4<9VLF>j4C5-F1FVP;B6V^pe z_pL{In6zB*x24ww-}^u=2=NmdnC-UBkAPKXk|--@-?l5{LnAAHy1si`M-n<5^wdzjIE!BSj< zHnVY#2lkv?n9WP3 zzCp7jIa|7ZN0ciRcf*yz8GULb{uG$lmlO(9NxbUVN&@Z5ter|7GR%ff-a=T5%x-+f zkm@S}d}3E>_#{7xSwC7y41E;)tJ}+d$UGiVMuO$~Atw!~gX=hQipTaY;bIo)<1ka5Ms*fMWabOSB;r6aYhvj zX#Fa`aw0oz++38VTnnNVOdOV}i92?7WV%_1tTIEa(UR+wS=nK?Kygqg1mr6Ov#C=# zf_bfTnN<+4vBp6i!&!=n6?5=L#QdddYqF(gTvnkRz^>c`R=pd}v9u=)rd=6&Y%ERQ zu@ne7$7~We4D5Ok0kgJ~U)Il99`?)Kne$!7bs}Zy&Vq>xf4oc$wD8f= zZS={oJ71xv%wZuH=9*$Bk9rRoXc{sPn?Djj=)CIfR4P*4KZs|_mvkR(I<$#x*bkEu4_d$GiP^*PV?;@iETU! z*Jp(U0N~l>e=Q6DqV#uBbFuj=2L4$VhJ7XzNJd?bb@dQeu&o<904<_NEb0Ucv64WT z!v`Stz}-bXO+Dm|MFx0@6j-Tk&3HGaVmr?dggzMQ7Ei=qNu6eWUWu71m&BNp*aXZ* zh>5puAGVzAzAjc@!t%M_(gs+1KCYrxbNyD{>T_ERwt7FVUid!;r|J1G7p_LCu}kLv zM*2%KQBsKH_P?le6zSa2Ge%FA8(eodGL38JQClz{p`=5oF9pCH)ZekOy4nH z?0hp0o-s;yN=5kXF?K$$Pji0`ru#$gl6Ox2P`0MKcFuj&J^@~lJ!Ef_d^fX4_}Vj9 zi*!Jb8oOogbZZ{Gs@l0YLHJ}XG-cYopZ`(4DfnrmmYdaa;DT}8k=OJ7hI|<*SVz54 z+OfvomY1iwWqkA-#yzX>hn30;(WcJMk?C0`0)S1f8*a3{oZ|f7~Jd3 z-O1VdbF<9v0Uq#qu$)=z`$U#I_+xPAl^I*}a;uA5D9@MkSy{UyZ^Tc7aB)NL_u6{H zUf&CSTllemlDWGF$Gl5Ev7PgC-CJ7v(Z4&J`@PwlnX(k)_cr+B`dDE>W^pkxm;JLw zYlQyALtD>1VxRW}VSCmh-O9^P_KxDiH|sV({BSt)6epJDl$ElGa&URmee0_&l?5%+Qu@*(jhxN=y7aWz221m} zz5iJX?34Hh$oXt^7@ot(9+!8@7jgS6);FEoji=*m=7&#Qk6-E0xl?B?v1!a^gwh4x zxBV3K&f+FEHU}!oNxC*#>!+>F0q)@q5x%lELIvZj=;x(31vzIc#<7&;Y5!B=v?Qhr zUq^2T-fk(?>(61d7Mj1sxw*nMwl1x=Pr*|guDKviwXam{kE|WTV&cKz<&9R@Y$qVr z9+fh!QxY`o zfo(x+{@`Qy+Jea+1zoQwSP1q0x?&sHPJi&im(;{ogH~?-k$3BjpF@;m110nkk;=|2 z{7F{#{P5H&x_g?D2G-Nj_$Bf&+lSa#Xq_qf?8p8$Ru9~-v|_v1eY9R>TWM*>@0a** zM%;7CZJ7@td}a06CYgvG$OWnAo4yyBef!|K`N;8R1k)~MKX$N$vB!>&FoX78=ki>l z9m+jXSNB(0H)+j>JAc3U^7K;Qf$SZ_5XljHH&t{Ge}!Os2*}yKkMKqnX$f5Ap|dZz zBY3xf*~rD%$K%g2suo3jG^;aEzZpwGx#0(~Lk{PUPl*wsls`jmq_S`Y&GLFANSZb0 z+jI1Ti>H3-NWsOaI!%=X&EN}pXV2eHv$l}Cjq{vvkF2%mkGbfQ&%(oCx^#210vs0o zl1_fwXGIKU6A8MD{B`_9Bo3Sd*xffhm>t2$k^{KLiN&`1A=!g%bq)8v0wd};`K?L? z*X#2)6X)(Yn(>5j6K9I^Jqa<-?sTh%beY~(8$UtTL39r}I}tHNJER@Nl;xU-+jU9s zi`U@tEuSR61?B4`vIN=sD+AIy!8HgJp~QFcM;8;5d6pyd8tNNO5D855{F&M3SnS z^|M6LA~@`{tP7gXvOp zuCCz}3hr8U1v;M-saItHeEPI8>UdKIzg+mZfMMnHMA;Ap`tyJtWEW+2(j17kKGNVu z;Pz-DuDM&89YmrgIMN#9z(#snJ!170At$7r-1T-y;$|u5|Jon&nerQ5UY8TFlS2{& zcr#i!mZ#1W-f16_9_6WRE0+e~Z3lBF#R!9m#2AvG@oI!^{iVe$?#L4-Mt9dgcFt(J zNmU)39!)SH6`#U@yEIs1G&zL1#l0Jmj8yt{m{8;-Q7$9)@zFLCX(_xS5+|+;k2O|!Mg57aatR;z$ zNTdY%vyW(cGGK2P{`5C_Ozo1s4L-#RJ|})$ngqxYe5N7bI+`d?rHF#JCXq$@7zsRt z8R5%go|of~T9BWMGwJgzS!$uL&u}*Mb(C!$RZ|d2t#1udA_YAbSF9VZedtecUC=Yv zdv~Gp;9V>Si2cDZSWD0ml)04-d=N9pGkT4bqAQ9Hjk^vBd^|Af9krg)n6$^a;!dIp z@1?cC+6Uvi>_K3$UH~CiRtH+rrVkKle$`>!NVCyO7lb}%F}4ZS#GG0_?sIU8%Z+^x7>;Z!0G{Y zSK;KoZD^pdzuPbv``hwyl;x8ic>g{^Z}u0?c2!F9jyqn)eHdf^?7OvRCtaD05lL$U zkW0UJ`!>-rZrJtZ+)+TnKr$Q*5gC(wtVVM^g59^DjUq{i2?bHoeuFTQp%>(g(rYK= zEyw?i{YG5Vb~F?Q8dT+QaT7=)A|F_fcZ|gcji&V+mi!6*stAw@H+N4QkiiA_TpR6e#?>^UXwz&%; zevD+U%+>K(YY&$eR2Gilzh?+ATHA+L!Wf5SxG8W5)cXo98)=1_uZ5?0J$b9K>-9Tl8|WopKkShVM|frVod8y9>9w_Y(GOOQNh zfu(pgL1CDWlNsz1%R}E=G(Pfka)c_+`XT2<+g>`hvmFnKLuiOMhkJ~k3eS~3dL|kN za0X_D9y3SUlFo^4=@h@%HE3@+v?6ZZUtO>MUR?#E!qmDL*d^KO~L-ta2O8 zi3`+-)qX2RQQ9ARO%Woxi_1uG7I)nk^Jz_z^=w(`waFPm>1548x?>8YZI=niDJjyg z)G41Vh5XBi3^BpialR?jcJ)7#8{l`nN#R2#*aX!Kdf1VUB?0|87W-uf0rhnCVaRV( zkb%9^>n+8!)&-<)=b^_tl@02BQ}H)67CZPJy<=OBl0yY2M6>S1SzJ95p{kgP4~ILL zV+HxH#`9ZB95Vs%>DY4Imup5-3dDw$4j_M~R`R|Vb{k{E87xSRg2y_FrQt2WPAb^^ z>4A+e#=$Ou&4-RfO~UL6GE)IMhA@ff-zCVi2LQIRK-~V2TI^sLLoDOK(9Dgsa22(W zHwP;@@s~U50tFx~+nm3&N=Kw=0VIQ1mMPA!Zo^BsAI)PnYoGV4^1@Iuc*)1J*8AZe zh^Juzii(FU)Z~p?mCmTTS8FFZUlPz?-6F+LTM7@;Z% z)Zm-B2^R>TFKk5H(9EW=VBZ)+B%t$xYDz2(OY|liHL;AAA46#PRJNFex=ZrXl;c?6 z6G9O?%Bl1eEKTE|a^Y}Da288e>8>;c3{QRC_?D6*Hkqt8LDr)UJ!`RVZ z-*pVY)J3sGq@c&x6aC;G)jT7hcE~R@^^T1S^_66TX43V?#4Sd7r06_*zS1)Xm9V@+ zGzb~SS92&$nvYYV$;&jaZ&pD-B#+p=A|+W?M_)sxw17Q1QfcYy>#8(ao%SJ7pA?Xo z_-H+R64y`=Jufe?7%_bE@`S`uFm~0U+y1ixQd8IiFjZ)Hp`S58p%1rm&zAGU!%+>0 zfuImw+zam&tDg|Q@OJp?fT}0JT_!TlG{(Ew$h5K zBQ+06eCe6>jBa$B19!}T@jeT&6GnxYYnu=;qqEiqYWqdgt~Cd9zOmnA$+(c4gA!b+ zhqO`0lticM+cWi_?A5+bjdV(j2j@z4ccKYzD4NR1GG4YKxeUZ zsGFF-euX#Tt~N3!FvCR|J_=D7Ff%1Xp^Yvx&yfdgQ5ETgh|y)Hz{4a*Viqk=@1hLX z_Dlt&0Z>+c+RHMRhaiPW^iF6JIFU!BaV#ixtq+tIoe@Ssb%utA3C+DQolqp|w?GWP zs8T5q(DR>ip*5aW&UBMz&cE=)IUIhq{_4C8qeR^^#u1+3Ll-EjkL_$G{BuXJ{*&K%x{9aT2OJ8a4?@d1_7sl}KXl!7#@!1|5iszb(I} zIy=pGRMcB<`C7pOCcQ-T`x>D_JAt-D0516ro3solRI;?teC8DNeFU}$HvW53x5X`* zs@Ej@$+#iCrvHZswo@=T(rlA%uHz{~`j_EN)7}XhaxT+NMJttC1@HjuXRJCLND~V9 zoSH^48~Rzt5IrtAHPLQ@Kt)&rR<#h9n#0FbAcEQ8y3_6S%a-H#CZA1d@r!g5z_K9} zw8gbt!UQ(j7Dh!*Jlg&agj}v|Qg>R^H)`guF~Gz=e9qszUB-wyR6%N2ItrRqaHIKI zWi;V{=>yK0!2~Vkas(=!cD)8D0_fDyrRU-!@Sr@*`le`e2ht=EFer2P?!!$|93=*^ zMSIS3dox3S93_xItW3QAke)Q$o9^_nv27|Ji?&pvLK!iVJ)@t<)ytTB$VC^YN#8Tk zil1~DkL;HmO@^oM@M~yqOBnW)S6->S;V2+$IIm-~0ccM{!dg)fVg3FP=vM^mp|vkx zOR>(gx)2|?94==#B?f0DDlD27?_-BmB0(0`6;fx`HggGqm)lWr7ecKNngmH(V?r_c z2~;+j5kEXSh;r}5XvCy$V+#0=)6wpS&~^KnQlO9#<+mVPMYs0_!ECE(Vg)1S4zd#1 zpv+3zwKA6ira37M^Q=48DCQbarFowlU`m#iPPl-tV~0T{a!c6YCBZ|RGiFAWlt-_5 zT_KHx;Ayp73g`F=%5Nt1g#NH>*Nvl=ll;Nu#ZCYNU;~ufYmT38mxLZ>RfN9maV`AZ zs8R{H^kQSR)<3#Phd!MufRgG^QVr?pBmj>>Fz&@}AkQ|BOK-w5Wni}DzcFCZCdNWj^9tdd820m_Z7)Ww{Xs z1wBWq#K2gMfR*hB1O$Lhf@LZ&eb?9b-Ax3p*?yXknncYos1(q$QqTlocn7TjA7({i zQcbWNJ(8s6QR>WDfbuHvJaK&U=+o(|hJ-JLD%M~+f|+50s3Pf{T{W0qUyv`t$`iG^ zy<#;Jn@)rDRE3dwKx(h~#A*3F|Lm6y<0wJS##!YuVg6TM{hn@J^hFx>sC}5@+${a> zDZjFiU_n=W3Cgj{sr7c5yAY(6|AtnRqy$yI;T%qiPIJc|O`Mz)Ou%X^`h_hQ#72NM z>R+ybOh2hm;=SZcU`!J$%2KY40vjS&vYPUf?3g#Ur2+Y`;oLA+n* z2;;L44!*FfVUF|3iut2L!r6q&$NJfOjmB87U$ zbbV*LAT`*evQbd1UvG0`SY|{eq94*9qgCFIbX{Aq9tlZ7RK=vK7Af1%!hXuX!*D9UQ}UW5YgRq>>NeAtLDhVsGGCTF{{!I) zKn?0^glcoza;|}7s;cnw`y8e9n8Dj;&Sy4`V z-UgG7M!|n_jV5^oaW0Sg3>YyD))_Mc%5>UTJx!Dw{#!@-w<8v zMIj@7NXBNtoy{-09ZvD_xdIOr(NF1RJuQDG=)|_ZZC8_&o_#V2`XlH?YA_~=b;Ru* z`%!JzE@9*e=iZZh`w*vf)9qlwc^5ETfR*}Kqs|J@fDP!3q$Y9jIzFvs;Gx#?0jo7h zPxpMh_#%@{nFTRM068~HnDpU&+h7#4IH6ms6Ue2&b}q|+H<`kN5q*c`KcBu|NMPZ) z##1_=ae#pB?JLxb*pm;S{sk`WXB<7E*^8JZWjlWoD{#FN(vrK4z%NJ1N+)1TBXu#) zy(cvYWDr)Lk@&Nf$*12-Rb)TYWl}Ct)xHEDJDdA9=kC|PB{3~l{q*{Sfde3M2YgCqTQpK>eqS*S6@Okkw! zjahHR8tU~D=)CX>u9FzU{!P`zOChUf|PD_jx6BLS@MDP(!kY4ifz zeA63|!CGLp&(13dLr^Nj^}2m&Z`Mu{Wff&Q2OSVgmkV*CVP0pzQXsWu6RmJ|ieEe8 zhollvPB~`{8gNqF{kn>nw<1pENcV`XMxPJ&Dr9aZ6 zY7B(b)`cS~kU(nDxy*)zq|_MovJE+N&{$yjCb~0f;RosjI7TOK znd+6{kDTCdR+cf7LN?8Ed$e+4-Z+|5up`UJ2&Bs5lz1)cKAtbTjw7x&0?c)6Wq|ae zLx2)$UP(c-ZRz^tZ6GwYK5f)f`_tCv47ion!-1 zRg&bUbN;Kk{vg4kK$PLgbeE9a-6Z2Yi3E{rk0a>YGGwXy>%C1LGuCVWm4}H0<`1UW z6e-^flvTU<27YeWQVl-njf-?MX0EGOX6!%XKn4E z(>unl=+z3ZR!x=iOl`8e$4)D)1`<7KwTa##{YpVMj27hw7AnPDheP9u7fVHFcFyjZ z_FGxcuT9SMcY!J*hHDw~Y?OW98zX2yaPieJ|vipNYBz25C#-Zy9{ZFt_#jUk$)>`KC z^{7$1r38hnMDBSy0Cav-(%p=_eG10`Fl+Vo9uYyV-x)MzvTWFE|h$`8=u7xLD&i% zYS6K+7dFSxpW6HaYiO;y;BSC-af6mo05*V_%D+4ZaW#c3tJx?!r&;zl?)73&6co+B zt==VZGcBG*1zkSJNNI*l4T`cIpDgRF2hf^GU-q7xQ{L>x!fq*XbK)Mbp*#1%q;cnz zeWZ0GligCFc$wD-;7%U}ZvS1n5F9-^)1uj6bz`i}=o>9L4I)oAe{)yt#{AlX#=74TV_#MLC-o#3kX2^e&b2s4;Dpu*5u4H>=Z9 zuGsr5*tYw~pR^D~Ii+>(ND2-pN&PjgDo}Ak-1vJ3%0p( zSgHcO%_iNUipR=}TCQfJ+(A~h8dDpWIb>CgR&2MW8-t>jk2}#OZCW)hZ7Zwtm#GT< zgpyfBB_b$ppd)p(J6~{nPfoTnH=`2rOG4gF>Xs`0)29DZ*#G}vT;jgo_6SGavQs8=#Bh9lyNnSWV`UoZUlS`t}yiT~n9#q|06*KNF32Ila67{Yy4-_;|`XK-Q+j~%%g z;56z2;gojxqrJeZq8R)pZ<4Ca#H zD;CEqj6-)pqWov8w0Q`f$Cck#RlFHkRGNH~N5Zjku|rcBMr1hBWVzZ=N&~A(Ploko zjng$`W^$%}^_`QK34v9Q%)fmGJLhvv)O@Uq zA(^&b+f#issIlOLPa0}zmz;GIG4pZ6mMb!R%jKTW7BoTf>;#=%tMp* zQPS4X05iaSpL4@x&nGOVm6L`-6kmvjGN`5|X_xK(h178TfzNDyzR=*J;TvV**+f?Q zRQPwtSnW{(^YJ53yqc9*cA>~UNrbmm$r^+GwO!&;VbN z?PaaD2-mbN27+x*P=hZmjq114Cexh(nCA5BNqk-e`K(KH9>+OcxSkBzR(s^E&-KC){1;A@qHw)x z^(dHX7$j^MHoaR+sfmp|Vlwp;mzz_jF+Rs-W$c*yq4LZ7%67KzaQIylrKhrTB|e-~ z*$7mZGBH+JNJ9NWBvrEAq_gT{?NXi*`_v`vzb`iYsl}0-XA+(fVUf3RCfp z;6Q6^8x&!#44W!;?EZbR2PwgTI}*tmBc>At@d9)OlSq$I`w9^DjSJWu$LbTlwhu_e z6F(DJiO{5`X;BN{%;ehqhZ631EYpm*U<#n|n_?1IDX`vmR?TKM4GR`N$9P1P{2EU4~bUF_dQciT~}k)g}Z>-1vAtsCKH z6A9xk;~W9~E}p(upSUnk-+`5N#m2I;9*d*CB|28$U12ZqO+SB5I17msAi3YH5*ReW zYFnaLHIqZdN~{1j`-1|q{oe)ct6g=nhB!~Iz}@)PjhHEXy5&y{z~ASP99nGt$YUu~295LxzLM&Y71zKU*ZdLqj>)() z@HuyxzPdMNu&?7sh!laaZN5?WDpxipIW_m!=xPXjQeyFjMcpcUJ z2Kz77agPWm-9Z5W3akEyE7R7+#?Zv^FWLX$`gOLv?I9b=$O~`CevDeg({2OfjJ`jS zKx6@K-Z`LgdP|5@65;ra@uqMS`&j|{na>H3Q;1^H(GXr{@>zUVh8|lah3}CUer{1N zE`j&Uw-U;83yEY1x{lccZEJbHqc;eXPnneSSnC|_isn6l){KjOU z1_Idn!`vK8sU94%{6}W6+ytR*L7)5qi>`6IF%msmfc%7TvBbrcmPF6*FIf@u5i=Yz z5@W_879G&bCM+B33_t7;mEKaWM!w;3@9ZHyNhMQd6to91T>-bjvlTVq>ys`MrNNDRW@q3HXHP-JvHCgYB0-rC& zad=GVI-Ul(OO9#cjhLQ@`@ft*@UC)R%lh59qZpiZvIV;*hdR6h}nU<_awg)%dJ7_5$9BW3Z-3@4gSw&9E= zEF)8F1`-X0zTR(N_!`n;V!%o=r_HqOk8>ElZNDv2PRdJt5oA7kdBhtzrb2w*->shl zO1x6nJsS;9jrVN^s&F!Xd*DGg8)enBFU&YxlU7$oDbs40Y22?IZ%AvZrA}!!%q$;O zPd2AE)zIxV8)fHnFRc8VHyQCaZ?c!P?Kxp(d3ZXd%IR1SS=&qU@*0UaJ z)njT-rjnLVyPfP3Yqe}*F3c|0u;NhN0W&>iU-Wl^7fekSS}j#B+Ld&|TA?=Mnxp@O zSY2f-E*<}7*>DpJuW;3_!5&u6vROkN@AN}9+{m=9}5QQ(X2(S=f z!@)#=3jpW+%>`Kg9omA;-+#CO{?E|=%7_$d`m}ZUKY9P>WlaSLUnkF0Apd=vf1cju z5;1BVXa$+i{rQx}D(GA@KR#v6|9HM`O+v$CafMsT{dv{;Zj=DetZ_CVX47vc(av=s zc548XMn`>x75Iq8Zcm(6@2Eq>Zq!EVm~D&aUQa8Ig8Bpl@EwWS8YiQ@URy&MIdd>Ik)nrCHyg!Q^qZ1EmcJD^=nzYB`*AuRBA$-Adtd=fVjkD5m?h4huyx(R$ z(nKGqAzbZPa)xbR5zYKDtATwp;-Rw-%Ae_i5;Ee)zlY|z3J;L`L%g2w=gvd6g0G8p zO3O_WA3(-N?h3b_mL$q&6$<r*X}Wdpk69jRPHS!_~4MURFhYQmbk;vU$v zv8*bku!7I|Z@`w5YBH(Zwe+~mTDD|E+(w)=q1?6gxD2OKx7qLOsN^$3c2Yj_D=6%3 z@Fqa#t3LuS9<$UWRKPSRB^@Z;Mbi}0_}LomSCF!K6eDdO*EJ7pkn8+`8s|)I9`J_iAOb>n>hj*XgMyy(fVLhlHI>c0$u&y(^nhsxI<-Nmi z&N34O{!j6hTelj;sxXXTq@=q=uw`KlIHZhzQd0~m zJxzA1YcIvg!Me;E;#}PtcJ`)0aY_yar|y*247$DF_Y{#*Ip6I*k6^ z{^?%(w+?P5hD!fKo$17K!~Jcz5&6g(aFn;EK#06YlszLV>I0N%AW5;dJ8DLXofQ%k z@2S%vB%H}fnQQlc2xReRM{cBrpwQ@teP>WeJxR{1A zyI6Oc(*(!Yt?1=`!u~I+cjR5k@(_PpMuY$W;Q#+`O^R% zjb`YbZFBT~KNnmh=u@Bu&Yp%nXW1BOnp0%Xyu5GjZZ2G$jKROlVsOOn9*+>C5_k2! z?(g@7UVp=(fi;yL3^bQy$J~0MZ`ahZt%)9hJ}`jpM>?Rt{TW-;LBIRx<8Ds7B+R9W z5dIvs?OnxoIk3fZ_Vm!-dgf@XL-1d48Nkc46I!&LGAJibRnLNKx!3Faqtl{^2py&) z=+ubr>y#b4uZjM^YJx+H%X2Lto~@QwIbFs72MRQn{)pIb_Hgu-^0Uow34LS`6bX%R zafVgH5YCdxl7@l25-yyE@mkw45a*DXw2z5xht`-=Y@infM3x&`Y?Y4@jaj3sy+~+T zNiEjxH)jZ!UL5oFVpf7!A@w zq$=M@gSKLHznz2TIX$%nD0Ae82AppOy2g|NPe6#kW$ul3esZ#@UsQawbV=+!yMoSO zv}`Cyi=9&PP57(>0mJVi6u&3rc`H-?oqng{*}1-$9)!~1!OjZJD5i#I&!h z%*QYXcA7u9LU%6tKe;zFlV`Uw!MW!+>V)EZ1&J`Ia!grE%`UyM)gQA)R*k4yFH|-* zc=^@LuGh)eTo}vEmwB-|;Il@nzSyp;m8bSUW!G5ibqGsVv#SQUop8CMH9@AXxM+$T zJQ6`dn|Bl*uLxr*2W&PeF?<}hg)gXL_$#dM8n}hID%jn$LGY+x>~2`zNx7q66COOu z8BLJ~7sHCUk>V~Cc(^$Sjc62jDooxb{R|P`Ez>VREkMrQCYu`o+h}?8^|-4v^Cbe6 ztoPWfn*@TvGiw&x74wZ(<}rNGVS&}ZWBPrw-V9(M2kXFc%AS7v<#huFKzY92@tzO9 zsyyFkB3ZhDSG)jT-Ma_|C+A|xqI%fz%Ao(gN#K;6nohMYwCUl2YfT^cO4~_2K6$iM z@*2vT00;$zZVPc)f~>@L@X@JeN`JyFq*0Jn=vtO1q&YqRRgeuYzzVm2uPZ)lb6jQE zPU{EnOXffTmmuU(bE5y11_@0d!Nc}lfy$oWVvsBHl<9u$%CS8bhwGSYk5c?AMkZ_g zud6eQH?AT%^p^42mI=0HR3T#&su?Xm9IBhOOsYaXa^gEO!n0vDl$caz5T~K0-sA-` z(f#@w%+dSyzRHTIi3ReqJZbFXH+rmkOVdKmd&K0VS%qbqsYs1noH3RKAf$?Wq_NKJhHjHa+Pea{JRbR3H3yFA`WjJ1^&PSmyg8|h{KmC`9xZ;D zh}dyFObNi7H47XtVu6)MKK?A3#~a4@1-;UJe~Cig8~*@H1cS$|)q%&4Y$`Qau&KgR zFM?cVuwpfaC&?W%kIS9=Bh~MehJD7EQ9tkB8=tQ`kXmaOKm#)~lhuf$YzKtbtksvmTdLK=2@l&@vz`!6 zTn7D<_cRfBB>2@aVBnq>O&()5d?e$gi?W>JL5onQt2+jDFU2msLe#~O&WN2Vza|`y zIN^G1?m-xzmCM}WUA2#xw!RfYD9bK%stWrfY!!bd0`!I{h=&T~bm-=Q;9 z3pf@7WlzOH*QEw0+yiCz&rzLh{EtRna8@#_IB)u+=8F+$0g{7u5B#W+e!ET+G`toF zr%E350rB9C)0mCaTKQ2M0y(i7G5snB9jsxPd*Hia$jNK!e3{!}s1M6}5uZl8mdat$;wsIM zuBLz=o|3MdDV19vp@1`zvsPMzt zWV#&0Yi9b**>by{_q52!h;(GjL*IK0QS?=>*h4=(RWCt>o>8bttil$J?ni_3Rv2%S zy)nqlL%hw??r)FIHvTr0YDGTRemHleayStN{+3>~4Y+*6yu2*{8 zsvW+fKp&?G%jNI%A?%sud=gX~;)^pGbx<#A3pVIPyMyK4|7wpe0Avfazx|lf!2jdQ z-_*{|+1Aeaf60&Rg#Nz`|1hC?pvQ8;ZfRs7kBU#AExZCKLJ=YdV{FD=AH_}9I?J+U z=;A3~e!bSE8$NA>nJ@{UdQsOU2#qRTfUzeM`jjxO=9$A3 zr53s!BH0k4<(uK=DCH>eOhBxG1KC6(PQl)kQDzq?FNZ-7SM>8PtJu8e3Yl}zAzq+C z@I&%2QA+#ETLaLrmJCJobbqxsVg=+KY6nrzCQUX{l>DG1VyE=9(W=(TOKYK6P8-u! zypDPXEyE)uM2dgn(T9R#^vd`0qYppHPZ*Bp_AdzqnO%;)A=Q#mD8o=FuD3K(n96d1 z@`Q9wr(08TvX8Z^eYb776ltY;dl?B=&Z$AN{$INM=tsq$@UJGH|EuCq|9=JNY;Iy> zLjUic@t<2L+sU%OH~zL#-+rN{-0C1V5C{aLf)?PZUIetf^gAHYw;-?YY~SBnWdXcZ zv{X>3Y-<0B&h_9uOpiMrgr}T?UJOO28tC7KATBYFw@(&*-CTV=gdsK(Bqe|vCh|4} z>p36M4Y#~`lDB=_v6Y(Q*(KPllxR`M6Jpi z^4HA{Y<;sbMKj>|T2uDMz>~UXlPAQ?iRqHKD6=K;n(5~n6CDYYq-}3F_t`JD)%aYd zVp=ceY1Qey?p~(o_9LE~1NY@_$}CX)_D$u+;*YMgoIa?O`Q=xUYT)Eb2 z(J$vkJ@)G?yd_rE`@v++ob`OCIF_&5o~L-~4qh02}G|<4V>g7iQWN)W{z?%zvq5@6Qn1O7_=Qiz_EBk92bI4ldpG z@MQMSlD%FX&I`3KO7q%C9#ozEDC;lJUWfh1x88lwp?|UOvRGk7!kLp|Qwml}I{cn` zD?;@`|F*>D3Hgf{x1HFex;c?u_ng(qZI7h9WE1mHCU`7(KF6JM{2Ivo$B*=Q|%yuQ<-UXn!8Z58r1T<%XQ{8>)XU z<~U?|BG<y` z&~>Aq5`oZd0W5vtx)Enapc{aGS_8s>k0=H}&u&21j(#)&Lc23?>=)^v0(6b&oAwbJ zlYnz0;LbP77JhX7=-bH=`Z<6FCRjgml1A5#J`sb^&Z~=MS_WM^`rtM~`wxAnc9fxR zbp7aqE(rY#OriRbhhWgPqmNY}w68FOYDXKnKsNz>d;noWnK{h=@X-Qv&FB?8Lh~nk zsAiPv9$i0r)rQb-;Rw}_UeTc&fnJg!jOcNO8iAu+3-D$ICNR*b2tUI?U=qLU0^$Jx DeiM_P literal 35240 zcma&MbC4!M)9yXCc04<_agS}=#*S^Sab6ciMYrf9Gh(Em7o{kt}@HI#R-wR5C5v~@71bF;PzR@9LTWI*+P zQH$#qg2f(Y=|yJobO@irineXqtfNXQz8ZeMp=DTIB<@>dcUtG3huT>Pc0HTaA~^CK3lwg*o+nq=Jk{chnTEH;r9n_^KhF->rSDOt*| z88|>NNL~f5lOBo4c`U5~?I~}kz!_KIVLM1+l|g1kmc96dzu$5+;K)`^Z`47BKp_zCNBjE)hb{(Zw?Fu zv(^9g!Df->D$@;2UE6!fb0MRQs+Yi#lECfC<%PBrLsQ~BvM#NidK^|tBkyX zRA>>56&Q>= zw)R)etUJ>Rc+H)>$bdkH$kwOrNof1}Az*D}BeW#Z4PY-n7dfW|CuG~EPfU6D1Vv4x z&-+q~O8Ut$20Yx8-0z;^rj*dP&GvWJKDk>M$b~?$zA-%wb42eYcnVBvCiFs-zSQBz zY%qKu5pE~0NVyTrgky>HLJ5y=sC)CLW*s^`o9jrLj7O^hsci)hMbjh}$^s@zeKl4! za|qI6=fpX(Tpf^06Ywclk%2MhE2J*G7ee)%S-Tkc9vt5g9?m{V+2IJ=#wt*OGnxY< zu+L&}*!fT{BKkGs>9L^n(#+`=YEZ^kR8s2IM%(;gd00=_Vt4^c9^qU&ppvC<{Qp3? zq-qUS`v*n-e}#hbKcN^pJ384~|Ch^j9ZWw1YVh7x3Dnw#GGzRGV;li1P$kmZFN-#MYDyqlcm#4<+pi*aiN3MjKX^fZk059|TvoJ+ z!NbOYBWVaMIZ9A1idLt0;Zr#b>4-&a6?5zrnPaB=(=Ydd6FHTa6xM=K-iW+7-tNv> zzN8S0c5Ys`Z3#WC3w%sBF#a>Hy=5T3)PG-n_wW3FI~(l3yLt}BR*v*^|7ok{`y@dD zND#Z8xd!Q;uFWdKMh#tIvzg-FesPo65Sh~A#hN?Y@-Xf4s(pA&Zzm_jgZwRhEO;6*e`jq0N=s01(rCf3f4YN?Tw3UnyG**A^g-a%J&Ym+0 z&G$DR`o{8kVrMc$A`^4hyn+8?pd*K8;nRP^pZ#CKR)&wXa0R+SLQ-+MgRR^c5EhDO%F4wg&8nl* zo{~NHHf#ngfeI>AB|Ud4*~_~Vg;6^$dWN7Su@_#0eW9^Br^_#6l$zzKVo2_7M03tS z8GS(leoAFi#5oT0MiO(f`NTr-F>ACT=(m9mUHfTqhi|Qv65ZdVP=dhXUALQ4P5b_r zLMNDH*T3K|=x4{5k@&~F+4xc3kZS8QV85JE-^0!GuqMS{Auvk_(EO5o7}$BMI1Ri&b~vOjKJIOYxe%AR(* zr*n*g;efT#7ZwS#h$sKaQlKsEa#U>f^5C8%s_7&WWlM%!2RaHI*KKGL$D`_QPGLKThMV-66&^- z?P<`Ht*RkTa$9P8q#zE$(Wcbly2-5U0CkXGjEcT&-&U?ibkhyez_X@p@i%H3fr;#rTlynAvWvIKgflBQrsk$Z`V7&C4#DMrr zO^`+&Il#42j(z3WV1$K++Er5w$5N zYhmX5*gJ5DfAoLn7;KaWK-@~?-3A~tR+@j>Fs31VF66<@a+c`BDm#LNDurq67t>DKohbOOFThYvA zm)51PpPPu86|^=I0O@5;X!Djq?($M`xBOFv!i5B)+;~}9_$nE)uIrYZ@j$N@3?9^5_5dS7VuzNi{p~@y+wx)v~9<`<})iDnSyzgG__;hq-j>W`t>Ev z4Vrs(!i7(8*zDNsx5^t8{8N8{0vI+ggnnYI!0PnKc_!}{;(xM!SwMj2UwDp{imtK;nl;JSctP-mQ5 zY_Ziw6Q*rcJ=IA_e>=$(5>1pVSo_UGX$s4GYMPaoT&?J$ar<^z^fHPCUW;aCTDOZ$ z!i%*NZJ^7A9adx~zzasFRR&_AEalZ%VhCvYgZwCsMZ!8X%9{ne!7&QKy|-)% z-@dCs<@Ex^_?I4l%1x!!Cf?O|>oY1+0wa1hML6tgke#O@z#96(;sy>It(CZ%mqnP2 z-C*}lG&bePLz+5KR!xzSPt=Zls6spI8fZZ3q2en2cYs*~k+Y-$Ikgq?WV1rPM5oLC zWP9NqSLPh7>4G{_EBPC?zUAImBQ_H@r5pU4>!?QckMG~R{|bX3I3#}Qe}c#IACLdH zF!%@R|IB+%X2#aW^#5%E|HK&paoo4?6*SC6UYK+U|lF`g_^gp(wmpW z>j}%Q?r%y)W%q0H1{nUFdWDPgc!@+rb+!NGk+_Q*ij<-J-jb#en3_;N<<8sbw%MVl zs6%jqsb5T+CD!!l@o5PtqLwGT+gqn2%nNp0N&rlBVPDE<QB6UlzbGIwbfyE4B@Ytd?4+7?u znNqTAb$y6UNBk%t2?)m)`SGgkf zy8Du+Y??zX_RBWPW|qO$!08_|z^-I)j>eT6ezfPP{SwZhNp@x#FNr>x zX{!{}on_#!gP=Hm3g-4@C(8xqo#|u&a;AVKyf%RdBhvN=O87F*;$LPL`CR z{s+;=yu1&OjgT-HvJ_kHj_3EatZpT5r3AuhAX#eo9R(URr%15Nhjiy9>xwH8G+Z^1 z5CW6^Ac5*cg$NhoD2@(cIDIRFEt3LZ#gQ_wd{z)sA)3yD)EyQ_swb89E&sWYAqcZc zRCfMRRdZIB<{&XwnAQ9Qk|BK*a4Xsn<{Yh?cd)wcM0Pl){s%gG5BE^3xIK1q{zEn- z8`pm&tRHUG(8q=GlSV}|30&X!Oq+kBwgc8r zmKtEmZ_}R)XHni9TKCJBsJ0%8x3TVn!?@`La^c9<1>~Ux^h0%tvddi)oMa*ge&F)h zc!lFZw7^em6%n!(Cj}5kr{~t|<^<2fBehU*iDNX485k^MwxkT}c-{O_w*Nyw{bTa& z&UY}y&sT)^=;#oPCC0lbkaU4Aj4by!R5?kY?hqN`H92ZEVIc) zM>*gpvuVH^`ufnN3tfe}mxEKC!nc6S;>OiyNN+;#@d+(w>n@y0dtX0`MMxy^*Z}RiMu~VhLi0%51TRg=7uh{vY<;Yc+Od`pM zGi__GUOZwXpqHjXLOw}a2}x@h`1SD*ghHJ7G%wXW6ZN}@D9L`oY86_u?bKQnmNCSF zLD(|WLPRFuO8xm8%4clT@w)38PXiwwL_>EAJY7Oq&BVydtyQlF|0L&u&G*A$r@FeI zfz|t^;f2@h`QSx0ui`^y;mYTE+t%kxZ|3{GYl&TDtJva$?(?!sP2cOrHuuNY_hI8f zMsMb0R)(5Gh%M)Z&(jvK{h_WK?!$t6gY9WH_REE{;^WJ`XN%Rj_NUXd2lLujIeKg!Sc&3QlXTHO9*k$>;sT32^smG79OYHyE{zZd1+ z%`WcjCEZt;;|aD`-3?3ZH*hDK)~WSs#WQ)m9u#E0FBv3zGCze;fTb@To>tvm@i z&y71IacS(`sX7e5cVDZ`sXM5&X^fp(hbEHYMJg$Z9Y8XdO~3%!AtV+D>W@D@DGuO z2wz@HYy%BwGda^Vp=u8#d{y)xfJ!w;tiz>ZEX%fe$#1!zZXX>s!v>w~nstk&n~t-0 z=eR3V(v?*fPxlRnmd^4|o{A~G=;SP)%9@_*!^W?tpU~X#H3Y_5My`DcdlbFN=qzis zt6C}Nuhw>pLqCP;Kyuup9S8EIy;)YhNrxkanJrd*U6w6&mPD^{&$x8Lhr&Jh%BNDw zOGM)0gW@$C<8|$xX8QgKAwJg5CBjAT6_qJ=gS!1)*2#ge_&(px?q~q#=!_T^K3x22Hjk~N)pIENz`|0h1HMl0cBE-FJr@>rmdqxw zd&1XK&lr7onsJm}>Onc5wlB}Fwj0|0b!IB#EyL23YRvHGYRpXc%KJO|#W7bU!m9Ca z-Z~dZtQ-dI;Flahx+;WZYWb>-)~pQ`MHu@M;o~N6v%?8jd)3 zrH?Z0uLHv<*+Oi;q}nNd8p&aDaM^MRtlRHl*Cj*1`6`aUEn{aMQ2EAEDpjC(Lu$>Jbb{>cyK!7zj~T@cZas z8-mUYT|UvY;2R;8oE~bptcy?O$w$!ip|ZVX+VCnuxgxk=?CPK1*;oCKXoI<)a|3Ja zBR)koo8qx1@VSNwhNnqcE>Jn4Wnpjl47vw_+(4VncSsgZZuJ$H0F_g(UybL|MW(&HBF1OcYVSJI4xqpEy+fN8>g~TyR@MPV?^wXXBvcG+Y zh|_!=J%MY3x!$TrNH6ED1H1U?E#`YmW!A~k{rl+Y()sB&SarjCDGVb#(mK>46!BM3 zmGM^-Lu%CMBu80DcIWcUB>Mi<1a|0*fMpoJ<3=PbJPKzY20nu)(rBN=vbuHEg@y^D zm8FyUecY)ZX6s<@%Ru$HktjlIBr?WkD6}WIXyRU_7n2@%_W~+?4a+lT+|L!mikK8I z0e9bRUxOvmj(*YdgC9TrX)Doi^_0e=T9VjQg~CB@g#R4FsrjwN0EJ;sapd-;b*#3f zyq?S`-<5Z8u2)6-P}C>T<@-bImhyztkHK{&_hHiAc6cP+z|K>~L42TZEx-hlS}A%& zpXZqso;P$Zz!i(3F34c-D9rx1N%3kO>{tQ{N}x5Zy7qWs?>TaJZb{wYUlciRH)=;N zmQeKJT3UdvnEy#QKGeh`T$|YO`nYv$mW$Hvhtay_3gVR0SmU$^i?;8SuSSOSvA@;d z1Jo87%~g9|0&BMIjOj){9M#q;q=A`~nN!59_uJ@e_?hk>&cr&NvvtqQONJ&?--2^}1ch&56;UCeD1F$bW|tS;BUl{T*eSi^V(&1AlIO-?qq-SS)=ir&vo zRB`ird8{z|EwCcq%PS$VRVhWfG=lI@ax4ou#vS$XIHy!~@qQg3@)+>1;W1xOn>e3h zKRsaC!10Cke!Y>a(jgT@x}E%OmLfkQeseGnq&(UwHXxMI=>EV%g1UeHojE6Vg~r*=6m=b4*%&hk0iik`Ud|_0b~Xi%_w|o6tS46 z-~&{Mhw*#73tN62xUJ>1oA_$q^VS90k5C&lPE~zS@I{b%YUnUKA;7r5i?KvBZR0Ba z_TCEfH^hn&)qy1sBtzQ$DsWq8IA93TD2^QILA+>$cWzT$IQKqI#dh|%J)|FG63jme ze8Mii<5E+NoGCA|;;vkp>4&7Az~X+)WKnWIcN)aTbHksUQuuMDeU^WYu?dXY#ONj8 z^)}Uggou|_TM()q{HZue;bjq%Rz>-CYkrSb!~YY5VGltUV#nbG5W_aS&YPaB83s>t z&|jKy2;`Cu9hb@(orzR4iGRJbHTEG2*QT4&8v6!*nAK3WH;4uOHLGF_1*=Ych{Jrw z3V|!mUU}|GEBMR4mrSU=(w)YKXY%&|oItZ^c&(;;=yTH$lcr_7+>WT;NemIV%g?n) zS~x}lu`>Bzj67!lkB7~Wy*+)@w~LAVKRb^h#dNJxJe5_~Gu0X6taAqbnUHTA_RbuJ zLdEdNLJr5iARMGAlZXof*aCF7O0K3*_XdN~)Cb8&hSEXB z>R1T*yi0YrF)G@2T$GGsm0>_5WeF7#j+Fug`br-@j$chtlVTom?)~fpoN`NEWCJ|+ z7aFYL&mo@Th#qXp*fs>CsqWQL$)No2k2q(jy4<#DpXo=u86SZ+$Z3#9L1Z$2&>DEZ z1fGp`AMEkJ<41V=AeYk;RblB~@!*)LAa)_+Vp~DA&Q2NX8o^Eg7w|3eF~5{#T98zo zPW6H)kEbKM@@>06y|@yCk<QOLk7m#!govAr=yfvJ;1`3O{!vfICmG4zb=^Jh^CZiEX zQqskVcSpIbtRSXXg@G&y?|D&KX+N%Tm8#sjs5Ok-x*fS0f<)NTkRTRx2>g^5nj0Z2tZU;6lnstCiv+pN5m(HSLs;Cdt zQ;oi|1*SJ5V<_e6kH0N(>w)>W%NUcX><@=0)y)^sMMPA7dDks|4YDRF2^tU!YF9m6 z6;3G8L_-f@NGQ53uMQtmfV4uN!A|!Z0?{?)>tw8jis%Xyd1cVyQs+)f=A_YABwVWt z&>GPFWZf>gl*#xtao?3G;@vWN|8P$t1iy;}x5C4CZJZdkiqDTQJ&8xJD{$`e>%e#j z^kr$qokYnh=nn1~X!+6L<>o`8{Xj7OLEo&}57_`O4V*sxFQde-z1@a@VV(Y!UuDgV zd)jTC>7aFzJXo8PZMzR5r=tZut%*8Cc)Ga7`3pT~vnSN(&x+d75U0P^#*T!htSxf4 zXn4!pb%{Ugzx^(m-pyGq9xB7eYL6NEjn?!rp?Gy`GFS&*`6gl-HWfId{t`Uy4h=Z9 zghQ&|5HU(F)Ukb=rp-RVz<)=Bv?u_`DqS@XyJq#)W<9x{CKG}I`i|t?#iJExH#$!{ zQ^aN^MEq#(ZR-Wx!^k7ejLZfr8d9TU0z)$+<=IkA6IrjzKlUa`Bjt?y8fzUD4OPOf zzcj|pw-yu<_;q4x7XxHx8NM#{BPNp=3mMRc{Q`B{Lb6IMTrR-^q%8#lD3fz% ziM>|?uHXCV#hLh9legR`XbV)QYU7?ithpke{M15ncVo(j6(t6q@J&ug+*sa&=5cg~ z>;II9iHxQp6$==s+pC8yby^H->uLP&6@R%EDHMC}`=?tAsDm$MCsL}t; zB@P+ftx&VF;XFoGXI`w4NZLmwxC4qcwggYK?w<;wI3SH{(+s_Yns8ZfF+(*`6(xL} zP@4^2l!|I>qD$82mA))hR17b;HV9m|v{+aCJmwmN`^k?ryaJ7(Y43)%p6!QpsElg- z(wAs^HVJ#Op{?1Vy(u|1D_C)c+Q4G*xv&>`BFgABt-n`Rft(}ioc1AnShIGn#WqL2G zPz+<1TROx0O>m%;Wm&K|mEfcs%jNV25if|MjvpZoYYO1Z%dW_RF`}j@UlP z2(7_Fkg>q~34~T2dH7R^JQ63F6rZ+{AW{n{Yq6oJeS$!rRzt4|9!8r8#Wx0uodWzO zK+Y&0Rs^^O#IUd2;3C%8Vprq7eDa>5YK*HL4s=@vyS{Djb?wx6J(xL`Iq#;gy%-1@ zZ2)|hoE+rLXyy3S3;rhqL-ed|+ACj#=ymNpG3yXA2)_5iHVJGL_U9ubSuP3TEJ?WU&peJp!WP>W&92FKrDQ8jR@MV;}q?v;9-?npdpX@6=-Vmee zJo9!GA2ZmOTjo>nN+e=ww*UAbM<|q?@)j!}LFCu0_7^q8pfX!p1N&e#1_QY#`N$bD za3S44x=u@qw_Xc76vNI45zE@2SI2;fgke5wG%emUMcl4b8|_<$@~}2oG~>Z4vc5Tz zsA91u>vhVPUhhlT=qJ==b|*@Z0j8AKL0zE+Sf!jP&m;^gJUph?=!;J&)n8f_U26-V zM4@!S-}=nSX{D}wLS4X8CadN!u^*C<+^HmJ*sESr5NF8e#i_xo$a8YA-Brs9F354}iH zMYFyHz-q_qCZS{GXgQ2{$sBY0vIz*I-4hj6hs1_OX5DX^%$oOt(+ib07C8%NP~I9_ z$|OMbQ<#PNR02hTy#6bi87ny%*x6j*lrB3kAqActyfAKwB_ZV)K^6Qg`riPNyiRE&uy2FvVUwjxV^)$+NyU(WBeF4RJ_)ty?CLw@0y7ljJGOR&Z=0cE>Ta_TwsNw0sc;grl z+rb1k@#D+5vcArvU#j=NbOn; z%Z?tMEWn8u4rp3d8^z8ONxi#tx%zEhH8PF3k!eo(iyZGaCGa&KK6PH9QIMHbx}_dT>13nX>nSi6{u+fG0ZIAh)8EV)>i*codN0*6Y{>A-Q5>%q6B)>p&qk>X!#6SiAPj^gD2drmRkt2VKa? zJ0dx+DH^o(U@=d%UKu60_)Ji-NWU)1+BrH40v?G@`Bm z5fYP}K20lN&{f0w`ofD6P~li7F@1e3zB$iGPVSpcchyKSakK_EUs#!X%HtAv7pPtw z9_7c<-j@KEG#3p3aD)_dshZz8z}G*B4xjU}urhVQ)7W3DIC+K=Opk^9fGy;GUqm4D zs;vBidY1JR-HGRZ!~M5AWjm&fuk@f0b*$;`EyipICiGNkRXCn*!k-!?%*sNj$opOjT(L3br2t?c=`<)iSCl2u z$Dyz5*xmA;6kX~eE)3?_%`|X!s&WjIR05u!|9O$ z?A589yO+>ry|6ZS#MOEYc0h!E`8B#fh z+!THMk;VQZ$3PIPmr4hhk!V{w$(RA%(QE~diP>j`jh|q=Go0)z`sQhwl>muZWgl!& zs56funifYI6>P#6uEW`R4q{g4^=<$9 z)M_7@93n+${o9jOgR8agH92ytPpe@p>$#5C1Vpo+yx-NZ_vH;}6V1_Y1m`#f_OLn% z2Uk~eQsV^hKKiaC4HQKsB}Y!Vkbu#1{e{S*>*+#QTMR8+X3z~_?JyaintevjzM$vDpP%Bxu8r)9p0ct`WI5%&r$K`Jf>sxNv}3 z;I9)u#V36NXe5Q#Bm#rU*0W^Cf@|8d96R3on~*3BC9Rp{5<|=wgA0`%qJj zxmWPvBWrFq;2$mVjj%1Lb@~exdwo>FBI#arcmKM>7n|QWC>3Sq7x29R@Ga6J932Y) zy@^=5jZZ<%taRfHL%7V2`9ev@y+Zn%h0mp;rvPQ4b~(+&IIdE9q40b@YPrL8yAzHQ zAv)rFc+xF&$VysAB|-ac{?S-xWkqQY7);%{SV~!kp6JUU)sbFVlG<`vBk5q!+ri8yE*IiKk-0G#E6+`CGJlh$#zr!)loot zeJ2b%ao#JS+N${bs<*kZlU583_Bm$P^$Sa6JF>xZ4U4v7rBb5`h1|neUk7FgZV62i zmB2~pksa(HU~=On;f;=^8dhT}Uf)2nVQ)d(82i#$!7Otx&7>69yBAU5!aSnOpf2l5 zQR9BF?D z!Kew&U6&@3DOfyPODs6j(9$^SiRSXsktrjjUJdttAUg%Bx*|<(fc^R3s^()&ZM#)% zZ*3jW^Q$EUqnt&Q^~)(D8ZtZic0(472TC=8ld2D!Xrck8ywSH@di2oLPyPn$mLVjn zao{<3v7J@|c7g%6A;@eN>3AzQa7GDCq{HwIGUt*0^sxL+Aet3VM1;l3Hcn~!%5wP! z27IH<>|PgGtJqUq)5bxiIhCm4h1o{7aX&I1LZ%#~k+3RvzmZX!N+=~>anyacTAbXt zdksM|u12+lGba`LN?BWjn^4C-o)Z&Aw`i97__lmygvcnK`B;q+#O^@1NpfzkNj8L0 z-w_<9YIRtJpbUMJ=k8!gS~nfE1aTw1hs-o=p4HROCU7)gzEBI<(bY74z+4G;}*KA31>h?!O&Z;>u&3x6#X3v6@}(aJ84 z8hGS)04jkJVUyuc{+!x>j+9SSp#(y>(o;k+Hl2*k+Deo$#eJtPrHr8{vDV z+K+z87)!Q>f(wN+i@EG{PJCI+Y!CR+&D8PuNoR%bb~rhgE1iL9JGIa})2dUkz3)L2 zI4WzN3Pf=B7jL7j?MfQrTf^WGuwp91zyGGkaZH%{8fnl8+B4Gl9a}xNz>E@(!$K$L zu+2nf>S-PcpGia|K`ocCy%qT75Ib^sytfNmDx z@;QhL+rY8&9T1L<pC$+b@6zXa_6}v8##blZV1V_RW_G5l6B<41)0QRo>z)?isGn!kcp5g z$v>c8r_MjP`zzP9s+kC39zNpPTu&sm;L)kES}jTkX}RS<(%kf7SB{M@4<;!eL>=|ItrcLX zcKFMi6aX|bXc}+lT&8a%0)HC1pxI_*3PCm_uDWxy`ub-2*D!w`^{kYmR~LW1dYX36 zJh-JKX`R+o=lD9UvUV&@7*@!W6$Xk~cti(WAhA~0ooBxEDtrYv zQ@k5er?ev1=iTuFSCLoQ3iYW0QPzv^rjg@EM6AvD%*3 zZ96pxVc)7xUyWW04j$?VBb}4^ENIMkpdBW8)7kP4S+01DQ*^OnZ(EA{!tM9OGrRpk zhjn9Pv>2|V29}!LI-gC2M)8m-QcdQvcx_`}5);Z5N(!@+El6hLPVD~Y1iTW_9v?qCOAZYY&b6;&Sy3j5#B;xlVM`N4hfoZ1f zR>)L8z-OA36GjysjW@vx0Ol~S>6RqTrLNrT-``U!gJHR`N%~5T+~#b80AUa(k-7N& zhYRnRZMFjtOo77(_rqu3#?wD!)K>EfXFfNwyDY#rmNgw2N5fNb8N~P zJJZB6W^|h}Ym%NHaGBF`jKB`Q&6v)~bE_7_eX7aA{0-|d?(tKv2WPB>?LeiZ^G%QP zZ4uRGE@NZ5P5W!p&e&LhitW#^MOAc-0N>^X^SzU6I(qnwak-ruD?Enk-76_=NYg%P zAd+SU+)7txtY%ZL`kB1s@N^@h2BCesrO1Lc5vZ=f(42N{gdG;3yBS0cAj{i(N_a~e zj}IxKq7%zOVz%LC(_D_xA{`)=dLW9Z>a|i^jG`Q z1yzeWs%x#aRdrjXvlGMQPdbvIZpw{^_7H0c{6m9Tk_z+=y4rzoftyu-%Y6sq<>NZi(g8SV38*Ur(Q_+xXyD`yWaO0#rdc)S9J}K$Wr%O^LjgbFL zcju0=()T8lHmq(N*eS3eY_}?07qZq2Qm;w$+iZLWvB@9;?e8j<*qS|&AltTpnE@g1 z@#1c6F>bO=8AV4GWHIkhN}Uv-1{^Dv39e0*0nxMiI^q~Hkhc2RPB^?~qyE85?d z6wZY-UVHODN@4oact3-#y2stdM7gisHL_ma=Zm184m#OU%UinyC3JS#c*Pl-O*`*e zO93-lz9k|^tbck;B#K76EN3>g`0j6SX^n=>#p5X^Cchfl8 zXt{Qy(@rXC{00nMDq1SS9{P_a^P$4UDnSHpzb2QYe*m;&WAb; z`vZ0uOhI0QioXr+X{F*o2H9P8P0LD^Y%9seFVQInR53ucCo4HpM1EnQ{z*}o5qyMy z4o&^@5sl0!o5_7p7h;FLz$Iq`?XzC38(tGJh$u>AwijAsrq>08y8nskLrS=#vd|J` zt&<|At2WJRc|qgsx!Y<`F;(C67M*g(SkVWznFWq%e468B3BN3hn>9)2P%qChjqJ*z zg9Z(ST^PHtJM`x+9tE2tbxM&AUgN_<6Ut;<%q_qtMJu;*jgXWu)@a)=r^00<;~McP zhxz@X{`W~^sI3L0fG~e8;$L^VX_8!1K8~1Y#wkAXBA#Q8M|LERjpC`~1fti2v$a$` zq?Q8GXxRq;rGMLMK9W>!&{sztqozj3hIovs9JIIf!$4eFYJp-D)m8KiWVVWI|CBi> zPjIvKMMP%_j=9XLLsjFh$?8^jX)~So9J|z)FIl4=%B(!8J%0s~mG)1ltneo_53Y}v zQ^#6bnOSmUG@WjpRi@7xp&HW9+LLjX+@@-!AhM`O|ZU;5Yqj9LRa@trPZce;!^G5jhrHqIjZf&k|ZhjIz>t zxpg=;+^;p+9eelA*ym4*yFIH|>Pk^c>9bjmz7JAGDRD%o`?}P!1mis0<}|Bmy?X)u z5Rk@ZBQ?Crd>>1{AFL78DMLCvx`Dp8e#i>O(m$aKgDhkYnn!oTsAA2ha>kbkxw(Po zs`|>AWj5S%ZYc4whysk$AQP`{IFd^pkT}NCt>_jB+fp6!YhW?J?>xMylz{shVvU$q zN>Z9PWjXsKo3~IQP(p`rwYqh!>;8;56-&b2WAbiLuxSHV4jB2n<(n2vcADUnA$sgL z;x*!)x3`Tl z#&$byYpDqE`+E{ZkRZ(OoLANzgCv_X(r&idP4gGVSgC^fbqSS*zlxQCZ}x=@#=&|K zj4m>i&Lw?}O3)_-X;PYf}iG1_5II#9ldh#0ca5K@l# z*q%0jZGt&a%dPlkG2@4!?CMMjjc!4wOQEv0;1e!zWL)lR>xE$F=wYFByYU_kmrF}U zMC~k#9l2#*#T$8sXX2a)dO^ukk)2k?pWud=nEIw|?>8*b-;Fb8PK@Su9XS_}rP*%U zo$%sIUskSivlXM;N)K@*Z^7LeX@%k3X6^Eb){3>;7Ta?O2VaNz&8%a`a1tETWL9^F zTnn$kNhd6L@QW75BSdIIKm*B0WPV~Y*UxzUC|nU7FpnV!JAx#kZkuy;p5|-ZSJpW; zTlc{C%>*Xxb#7ijgDsjwPHtJ4ybpj5Ldpmo`Rx!Prh@%;^tyvNO3Avzw$e!5&nt-Y z?A&sHE0>RGm~1VrQ`8j@Ld{L=fEHo+`_(5}?AI0?mIFopnB)R)uug^Ufyty*M5H+Bt#Jj|5BayNd7PkM@=OGbqc zx|SS+0>sn4ELfyHy9&`!&B_H;9altY%S9-@#3b1ag;qWmZ@M5orsd0#gsD(3e4AHo zvTayZKT?U$Ig&?hyc1=cR^vvVt=2lzb`_SCX%99@)O<_tK2)X~9Sj21d@C}-RbDEV zGwX&X!`Y~FiktV_S}7jF$L~q7wZt}wG(lcuUSe8I#meFem8Bi+5+%O(j)Epy7TY)) zi4w<+s8jFZZ~NBMi46iD@r1J|LxAVyO{VZ4 z-YLedue1#fu1j*TvJ+SsL%tVJjGibKGNDctYLvrLK*b|&=M7aDYQP+F{W!fLx6w;dVVTThe6rU#f0vna=}t+r~*0Hn)9$#pcd zgs`OMRD&+e+0u@Rs>V3?h^0MFOKmvwW8b_XlsCZf< zS#Zy(4;=<0C^|Q;!?&; zbAU&ZpCq-vhfohvXdMO%V*N8l>XF{0YMYt@(Yav~N{^^)GIg?>+K zY@D)I?L{a0?jS{&xRkmqlp)0#q{=nVp&O4HOd3+3LS<&s(`bMQb-XpJK>udSs-)A3 zso>g_@Y=?x;W_{no#8}Q(?ACDTG0HK1embFhsDyETeuPy_zqLi68N20%9)2{%J>+~ zHu-tp(u%K9al1|e9_{R(=WC=46`754MO&66G=(^hPU1q=>X2`^hwh7)h@8@kijb0GYl9Za0ywI3G`)_PEHdNiA%_{+73W&%|u?DI9uj zR?965rDA-Y1Jr}q>xW?gngR;ERVRrVG%+1zP*(k+Ca%gNQ(ll#HjelSt{hs|R*1w%qA@J@C}JNA5Kr#L|hyc28P zgS=%ryza%QkG>cN9s4PTT55~Bivja-?>R(=lQiiwvhGz})6$8{y2qucpT$Oej0K2y zO1&$TXCGj+dWC_aK5JL_cm8Tqe*9V&PS#8QzIj*y72j9bYKF0tzd`h3Ud{)ODinA` z*JR-AJm*OG5@@Pwt|FsvBAthdhKgt}%87-QRJXZLsr_>fFH)}h*D>}b=NDv77kMX1 z9o^Fl`YrAyx$3ekoRivuSKg!mFHz_r{euil94Z=brbtMFqV=N8#3k%K=Cb03$ zW9s(?NiEtn!DM8Xq-;2Q`33xN1q~G5Eq*cB)z^Zha1jtp{B|*WND$&>@Y~H(^EWUo zX)F7(d8o9en2E=u|stuT@j+ zQ~<%puU;41oQ$PCuu2^Z&E~>;E-}Y4aoVtL_mgA>q~keL$S5{@C%6nR`JP6vEVc3; ztB81)=w&o;wGKm=WETi^_=i(a z#(4V~8l~AOOV%zlWH$O^CDE`mY@5zXwV^XYOg8O8W?C}?8iBx{MOMJ69FPOS3b*!; zk*W*Sc#9iWU~L!69@-)VopYDMjUi9zW;~#b(U9HKeT&>qs6wS${W>7zLm;|nr?Oibe6IXvgvI4 zGfm0L`$XpL$vH3)i*iHH+qCQ>&dY4tjVL~LN3jjxB4!CT6Op}t&-AB$zd( zcA5rqE;H0K##{7FW~xv({|q(iY5?s~Qfx4FuSbcnlQwiJJv{(5WyS{ECjJ_w9IN1c z5@pt~P`9=>v>mF57q-HH%DdpNWpX+4zdMWCLepTG?}+l8Ib-J9h!Jn10H4M(xfu=s z_=q|YrKhn~8tuQ$S?}gd`2{7b#@E%nHnJh)6&q8|>1}X4d_1xWy5$O=$qCX^iD+#X!J`+Y%Ii zFwVXqSch|BNR5bzxYZdN!AKzqudf^JlEU~I|+Z! ztgxyi;1m7K)%zq@>?-ESYwP9hCKgPT$`r&j;|H2~bCxYXP4ZD!?>8IG!`10K!qF7| z)&q3I*MpRGL=^jp7vj08rE#4En8Y_NoPN^uaLhpN4=ocY8&{En!`L6lmqk^lb(EC? zR2=^`e6W*p99N66JXpSdm+j~6^YT|pT?hb&!E@;LMy`dCfC(b0o~=HUb?wF{rT;lm zCh~K}3FSZm_E2?hL&h3xa~Mq&8Ar!dwb^NN4i>9Y!q?XnbnVt^H#hZVn2vs1H7-Y3 zMG$4|LAOeXc>aAyk(IA~$N_Q5~1np2F1r_-1}RL6=$T&O)vnvbzA#0lkEz%%J?F zkA|fqHA*zQF%e>V4~9>0 zZW)Ka%T{jR$MZFS0N zR3%6go42d<4?WUkg+uI)sk}lOS^^`{&Vfc|0;&!KLLH~WSW`TQ<8idRCDhil)&JFl z9?AQI{cl57ya*oHJp&NJEsJ zE){PvqY_q+a3ChMMzl3xgmqlljbq_{BrypJC|B}cWBD-Ovz%{%N$H7HCvK%5gc&?V z1a0JHEt4b*p2(N@M5&)bax$Q4qec0$O5xQi+Q~Xujg)3tU;#$MXNc!kBeRhJTTgC5 z9P1LZLFd(>Hw4VGQOxZFjk~#0V)~kv_BU%DEt^B2P1L=hZmt?nosdbO#FT$Vr~0&4 zdVaT@;=-{tNTVseYe&b>Tq!Ep_k#2mub7eSHY=w2*oI%kB`7u-#ABFuEsOApNoj-7 zu`9+^^BaFFO_y^*Xgb4zlFADOBC2PrPt$SA-)*fDLs)!g8yB&tNNNCeTZHIQ;iTc- zt?fGz$6y1C6j@3`^z=;Z^_K=!tBJgnrD@8%gaF9S^pN4u?YFda|4K|DgHo2V19wW< zx3ekP5A$wDlczh%SwIoUrkLq1pf53sjk7;!11~}sWfbPilXhgQF@ZeGvyTP^W@WFK zJ*=yUY9N?hJ7sIl@XDP(vf^18G3xsXN1QbbVXJ9q%M4h)<^_d_@#iSX4{#nqQ))(Q zqfPv(uRff9eLYtkDv>c=FSBoMJGlC`ngJr~M`h!08?E0FWhS5X7uY(+(Ru?E)vb+| z!TAu!2f$*zH8#D#jQ(udqq<-iurOU56C@~N8!M>IPywV6n;DuZtf}U1Rn)P^ih6Maso$ znzmq{aZKDiu9=EeR?^B)JK%`3j241raji?5;y}k&j4C<)U(SM3bON zYT#9>{{frGZe3WzPT8Kdw@~)Qjdy|JTX9euw0}KYiLW!-te1OQJD5TDzf`g6?5iB$ zg2`__vVLEA*P#oUO&UGm1cup3VyPtmtM;DMEdMH1qQjnsvQ zR}K3W!;lEsEU3&W$y=yXux9n^)DwNn7d#+%T1e>S84%TTmD)mX#^_ctgO_0jE$>0Qj z6lVpnX097O@ttO^4Rky{_7wk&8SRUf#Api*kqmOPz*;@-{f2UY`8y(*xj8d#oT&dC z>8%$HTUf1aWKmpY)D`9Gu6GO~>Y4+}oaPS^ea1)$eN(v8v$1armWSnzcn`>FQvLR^ zy^a6%ySZR;yk|$BjDB0s_fh@?47eiWS}D;J$qifZ}|( zD)z=nsdmE$C~@VCPVLkS=ftFAckD^47hz^lQ4$;G8O9?7LYb+ek=`yx)v>{;P)UJ| z4GOt@Y$bGSD?{Z!Ho}+7c8Fj8xR0NAKowSA2L(dYI>XT*9<9VskL-MvnEg~mOyC2K zg*QK@b~uUiG8A^T0kfv=))3r^lwzkgxXe3dX(Lto^1RYhO%0z8Q6aAMi+OZqL(k_L z_iUc*YbKHh{oe8{37sl@0MiI&F!YKyZ@?lmc;4ulP903qXmh>v|I5{5>yHlJkN%@_S z&@hZ4TyakVdnWf54k#yBT1e~B0oDT6xHv7L@SDWGwveaPDn4wD7~0gG4CEr0IeV2- zNnQ`PsyuSL4i(BIjL>FL&pCTc#@=tFy{wf*7M521Qc`a5ZY&5JV~Ndmq;VwUU=YrD zlIYnDvDrLPtMGsvI! z1R^^0W-t3I&=>nm3UhD`vNI}@u@XS0t_4H>To%Ki_|8lgX<3sllS4R<$WoNe*Kb1h zeSi3VXCmla!I3tj$g{q0Y10i_VPCk(CGHYsTx>-dCt4&oVg6^Ad@?J7(i8l&_}_ z7NQSwLnLBfkvjf!2%8vj71SeXXrhP_iu&Q(#l^(!kNv+Hch%H$5WEM=QcT@7;>zS!4}SE zdlfqvm3*w4W~V|8NA@0sq+yKlFoO;D?lWEr&R=FUYKd}sWsDTw;%~?0rShcuB^TKa z_Lddbq>N_-Fl-g2ves8#&W%GOiI((70|!>nO+P*3nT5R!Ss!WQV}OkhUY z*v6Z`?wJi>_{UU7v6Yd563Q4kPeEw#9b#;=P!+*)<@`s(hz_QV%rx7i(7-S{4y)=F zmfPH|j2~`ay#OqZ#C1nhJ_KB^j|h0y8O4t#ei(mPr(AIXst8GnUR3T{A+V`-#X4zj z41Td;Fk_gz5xU1H-EYSG3C+b>Z)t}jV`oGvue)lvl?&_GH@C7-SP>ac=`JTH*Q`p#B$Vf-j`D`< z@YX!})2743MR@ zy#*41rr#8)0pbIb0P?k6I`G_u~KG!wc7E#A2z&Da5TLs=WR zhb!^V*}BMzW9W>oTqPe9(Oq0@7fl=I7_0XG4GH+vjR2E!i{(wncPP5*_LasVQA?o*Um!Y1jmpHo%P|MwY5Cy`o z|1f8?`tVTT!$cOyFeqWNS0rVC&K!v#SLjo=;f#XY5y40Ce*Kjh-0wYy`e zoA}6y{v{)PNsjNc)j!Gqa{bA2I<6?lJ#yNU)WJx*t3!hdTv=uX63`eix-K@BCbQkT zgcY=!N{+HHsnf)`V}G-#>#rb1rx6xr4EU%LJ0hZBo)w(xif=9BZGz3+r9=re)6zr1 zqR6F8Tdb51i|m#;noO1zX$kuSp!4sW|GBLiEkX42n55oaO+kJj)?xVzS${WLwC0_mWpXY%m<0o2^S@?#oltCna zhG?hjO_7-B^0>4HTF6xDL;G1+M8a1W)c`~-NWxrj{7f z3aD@B93Cl+1m})fJ9)BeZ>)9iUi9@?C3hjl=Mp5mtaihNTtS_w$r1h_K@`@r1m9J! zDTk4{=_H(UcPIE52xGyS0E?~bzb#^=|G}?I(}b^iE5z@IVMLl}!AAb4{|W2mugM~} zL`c5+(|@c!(u1Z2=mkvEQNQB)-!)h02fu({Cf0BhGUe;Y$dr4=@{7Oyp|9-7evKRT%#7K^=XN74(WE*i# zBm!eYXhy5g9P+-In2-=l5v6zJsx5Q0%miwa>psStk@XB-RMly&xf=PXWB^;kL~I({ znqJI9vuRRp^CW$)_sB+UR+oKUCjPmV_9$}EE81M6%>(+zfE#4`CXxP>+ouVrF@1IM zlT)~#wfhw@ZTAKMGV@4n723vJ^@a2Anrf5sW-dd8516y|LuI7JI@Lp1C{%3Gp7OEf zb!U4=SLzkQQZ`tMDLh&`wdgAyFhV_t&|URSgpAG*px@2v~meGHVG1`Jz@Rj|BB6Dh6e)7 z3c`95COW+en8VSCOo$@zprdvVv-_R3-2+ zC{h#f@o1_W`*cB!?vl9BYX&k`oRV}{739u)ZVEoumX2-|R4e2rGNILism|r-jFk>f z%wHEBnpAZ&P65kNo6y@M&6z|*RB|jb&i5r4?XB4j3P53g34cbSv~rF}s!ta>{~c|W;VF^E$v>(NJ) zpJEftx}0*+^t^}sNWJKQf7Hfa{Mp;E$R7FCVky01?iO~)McbJ)NZ&w-qS-dCK)|$b zKi4ivPqb}9l44nF+gdR7hZmFQH}DFEZaU2c3W$R{DNJn z2W{N*#*S(!5n!$I*RLfoywJ3rHiD~aLDZn%R~?%EhQ_o}(5yN$oo@#mHC}1l{xqE^ zB6c2WDZEuK(~Z1k&akkN7`#7N;XW7MRw*`{-u-C&OJVXU8#+z9Mb6^?^*aF3*V>CT zI(~9oFt5l?Kra@niAlL}ZmzVGUE)AfLzPIQb{7o|x6P=mAegYo1NH4}EK3glVbb~i znAQ8~2eLT&VKf>Ti?#FJ36@|&Ix47a2fDeh3@K%boNy>B5}IwBNef@L6{9lCeD{`{ zuF@_pG;d>lPKVE#lEU%R_ZN6ava+4SZYzUsS#|YtzmAugS++%qB0eQ4D3fRir!C z#r#qoNtx>`8%<>C3`UxN+##s#<-v+5Cg6@ciUl97ymCXc6fFMeCSnb=F`wNx8}f$d zttjWK1du_gP#3ZG%27|b>6Dm?v>*GP^OpiLhrY8zk%igIG=z(YydixIbLxJ5;G+@isB1H~;+lWTbSv>Cw0=2Tw^T&)w?Az~?=`%yZ(6)1T6CCAOi12lv+Oh~MRr|6z!e znOGSVG);_i(Bvj5hLu?u$R*Cf6Vx%j?{;_E+(WS`21>AQqc&|RWeNDhLm)obNx9#L z)uN^uQn&Fi9}Lx(v%Rg4WO^-uqV#5e`idOXb2FwcBAYM_CFOFF@~oQSkCHYG))HxH za0Xu}Tu$cqs;}$0g&E@v$}m$d|G41Ms0L9mGbZXL#0Un1r(W*w9;6%ECEtESjz>V!63FCVu604?Q0TW1#Y zv!nhINGR8a#%c=o6E@iqzcKWL$Kd96+I<(+>SGMMsOf1&5H+YxKVP(I8|UvQZ=()v zEXE+v^mcFK!VXE0qEpmg-i?8YJ%ciX)MYZ2xre86>N@_|8m>I;2vLI!zMGEA@bGzK zkRKmcIq#W#z?n2HADQ)pHlY-a>pw0dN3ag?+%x{JY8d1nY*d6g>Y%dhu{f<2K=ve# znvy*X#!Qb)E>fYSRJ{KBN}Drhr$PcC+uJWm;75qrvUFwdoG0bmTTDlmZFJ5Ld5=H~ zsFXN~$DWcyd!_|ZtQU6ZAK+Sh`Rj)PsHYf5j;Bo82xObubtsC&>}7UTW+M2SC8(?$ zO_FFnjcGhZ4K&L5y`n+r4`*D$mU7&OF$pYJn|;$Y)BsVuD`tk%DP+NceN|sp*Z+<@ zi}8GGSEe$L2e=7EoHNt1B&mjrO zh`|U`?VO~hBs0DB{bE&|*dGXmh_}RI4b9$cU7dhSc?@Setpz+{O+T`u6YaT!>a)Xh zYdI`_lES)-XWoR5sX*LKS>rSAq*BNz>)=E&Cb5pz(z8eH(g|9_8tGAFy2#i&k9r=c zR@xj8nUS6F7yS3Og~p$G?0MDn#;J*wLm7GPq#eapK;?YNKy2c#9oT<=3gu+0?D}=u z#M-RLe@vrm{I{5V9@-Dc%|T~6-`Hu;M(UMwbDoJJFxTK1TM|L3YAeNf?;S>*S66@o zMm=<7$C1Smi(Wb3$t6x8J~``$7+>u#`c|#D_->GRS4nlh5m?=T)+Eh>aD-C*MMV(i zZebd1RS~a9-Ukg&GJ<&ZkgzALk4^;x5Fl4S1gl0Ni5a?4K^QjiLkzsTTB=8RYKI5zqtn5otdY^!cJ`zh$D`*n;(BCUIw_*I?+ z)^c~guMt5XUdDa3QwEGM?2?<71KfgdmTDGQv&Dh-&6p72(fNdl*r^JA%Ilq$WyUb1)lDN|i<* zhOXm+R@}=C>HaUS|8;7X7(i=;ulvn1Tqjef?MOxlqC{+HV#hv^KMHb(jR#I>ESBji zCv0=hn}rx)E|HzzU^J;Q>`}&cFK-}0AWPLXV7{1TS3RFC z7`POHmrH~mOI0a`D;F3SO%ToM&nmAb=^1NA?4D+F!lvN(9o3y^n+?M{T6=DS+hC2k z+Rw|@TP&2fB$xa~FXJC)O+HkcJ>x%3-PVEp8z=TRwD2TbxakO{ojzg!`eAe8i=ww) zX4mOeckjrCEOU>`I(DF9sU|>Un(CgKfBqc5@H|3m<>Zvo(uu1EV!O!MmSMG7MqS5s zc649IOuQD{D~*@1p0#S9_Ol~})HFpj$DK3jvAL4_DiR%zA4Y&@M0dmeC#x2rkGUKN zoC9uw=hU&oU%!U+X1JMw^_wwcf>(vx;zN$Og%UI6Msgu0(Oh3ijeI0JH2DIrN@l&}{kcd)>IQA3cqipaBj38jz{ku5 zUsVR=%nTyafJ zXHDmIAER>lXUlf~MwJlpS;qR|;rg;(aU+4Wj!tKcJrb*lo#Hm)BnI_K(r&5M_3WA0 zyGtl%t7Q90Y}=b5WfNnJ(YS|wn4T(})>X|zox=di&lZPF>xn6oAKE25q3VIT+_j9potXXZ;1JU?8X}Q0# zI;5<-Wjei&^TEIX_QRx^e^ld1#j%OlEssvOP4s=eO1Zb7ToHitz^1ji(-cKj-@-_1 zNE-_i3~BMrm%ops1mAr5FV9wg7byy|io{?gb(uG*j7Q>K@=efBOxOqu4_IgNq$0}~ zCORGuOgba5K+Rasll_q+k+mU)8GoZk=Hp+Shy>}4Z;dS-OX0e5u3eF7nT5ug**~$} z{UJLZu_Ced5-nJ0a_=xDSTrqm@|gY9;doZM%b*WR9j%}YCH63M-&Muf4!x^R^o*a? zmsJfc791|aeZ#7Z%*hZ!xaJ>5g+w<n~&}(bcjkAKiebWjZzXBdxi3sYNh~J8WdA_74My2Md~UiuYNmHZzr?^fM~RH zgvB^Q&8m|rg)CFhvj{-iQkCX6>5n6%@0@?bFlEt?aPxqLTj*kWjwQ6~?@jEz%7v{h zYC-FED^@yof#p&IDiQUPc1TOjJgH0jRt>|6+Fx= z^+OF?;m_vzUCt~l4E)L|hW%G#)72GxoBVQFvBj$m$MN|R3RTVS4joWzNTK-EymqDf zbxajKTbULJEIvJ3dBCrCmcQ;aeqfmc7R4w#U`vmXZ^b%js(;MD#e<;?=wuV&lxWkwO}6v)WdK+=3_{En zgGjd`d%H<_NbuUkki>I-4%*1FjE)>txHz3mmGd@)2>ffzBM$a=zhP^~{#NAa5 z;Q*+vzr-G|2@ck+GJMm`HZUw31z%IGGfNZC7L>r!>A#e(Z&aiZ=DkCo7U>OZ#AsH! zSg}$o?sTIyiRVNhgVNZ8$#2hgh5TA^|4DSgfK%Dh*X#J_86}HuZs=F;_twn6Ja3L# z_Iluw9cc;q<})wgO*Bpw+M;!%44!ZIidUA9)*cJril0=PLpKGa*y4Lv@FIHty(K4h z-sj{V(M8&msChgzQGC}RoQYhC?ke0D2d^%8`?8{Kr9|MXM3rs-+cM| zjPzqsPWtA{f63{3W1&Ymd*w$M6z%7Yo&mY78{#9o#<_d7_D|wuJVwk*HDlkVP|OZK zR>w-CXC5vZ4@lC!0gfel03$5|G*j1FSzP=@zl#8Xgq?nSqKpFVxt}o{q^h%QzugV8 z7nr`W#uuvLh){Fr=yT;fFfw0$7j+iQjy7Z699r4`=(pu~$JJE5YWsn+^Gx391{phzviEI|d}WcAyuU>EODKd2foh z3*3SqGtys|9bezTjB%Nh%w9e(^`OsNr&R|K`q6olFa)trkNrzD;0-vvlfUss5;~^= zUlJ=Z9ZjU>SEd0!4fJifq0YwERqgwswi0*`5V&|4Q@BmmDXf$RB=Hs9=$lv4%O%mJ zro2r*1&IdMcJdhO`)$%CQ+ytV9S9*Gjq9Y?ZH7ggb z?GFfooRFrf>%mgZnG&hfu{R8=Q^2+?AuG`sK*gl#X@e3qn8+@R*4`a&m4eFp9${jx zj#59Y4#?=Xj0|wH7Mbsk%m%3yyUTFTy2>rL!bAi)!qx9 zPOp;|bptPT$;k$*inA z%%!|9MQ|a8U_D+V1et78th+A($0S*+m7XwUq@!w0Srw}jHwf%2CSW9RBQSEWiINSo zQrCZ|at^nYwO^+M*SPF|N!{7GOs!&t)mWmu*{T0r4}D{mVe8}19FnWX^4|$$?d(5l zV5aJzV6j$fqx1zxZ{v)@=G|af_EQ^U&{c4vgskvz;-M_l*b~jpyLtDw zz1BSy4?}0I+Ll+))Jnw zF{2nhiv&Kzk*R#-i6=)W)2ElW7oYqY7WG_Wp&ksI`#k}&B{xPA>_caozK(Ki+#dxL z+x+%@6R`n?4bl=kv(rr(gQZ=|*)5a{O2obWXM;6pr&FQW#45avGAI}li*ayauf8dY9Bzy?%B2HD}dU%{u)}A?Rv>lk@<=?jpi?GB~5j#cvz) z{+FkttFfzwP26H~=6)1U+mMkv(xGTM8OW2lxy`4CgSl_Glf4M@Ee~xGH=T0uwJwPE z6k5sZCsJvuETy4NR03TRBNJw7CzLVkp$MWH%oVbHyL~w7eAa|*B3I3bRp`x;dOy<6 z*!$ii{u<&3nswBj)v%Z~T|KKi0Ia7>gN)(9vhw!SG=ozpAjayJAxR-Yf@&bpI&xjM!=OXc*< zO90c`IV#Ag8|A7RYywl#)FSrnqoaYi(b#;WS^laS=Oh_*gxX^Qu#QVLqM+A)>Scel zOczX?BbFLJ>5INm5{3mN(N2`Lbn2qtZmT->#8Icl*vOvVa$9;SZ*WkK>rYT#BKI)I zyrzL$-HUoY^*UT6NmCk&MUt;Knt8!m+Q&wiMZpR|#v*Z6Vxg?HKR5;!TbPQL(>S9#kgj5yF9g*WdH>22?-`)ZayhpV$}tzC3-R>Bu_-g#BeW~0mpl2RQ16hw zRiT|MlEx+E)Hf=?(Y8j0P*Fy(lf>Cz};u)kL|`2pT$bR8#l*v_pH*k&V3;BwpXp`}Vz%)!#NB zdKZ?E+O#!#AXsaUVkK?Vzdh2&$wrR=J5(dG8kR+;=&JqRkA3$%$&Y_){M7;o>`!kc zdX_L;1Z*d4@M|yfr53IXqqk^a>xh#!U}VOA>qS3r7h9eJjW+#Yx;7gth>i}t zo)jk)yH6AM!vv5e66iy-wtwz>#c+{(&OgM&REnX-P?!%6#r<~6(FXLf6;-2B<=ORD zXB$WQWpoOurT~1Bk}IH+z?|PP&yglEi){$J>f;VzPHn8>m$S;s^~vn1louBg@|M8? ztqt7_a*&b5yfCzAM8?B%s^K&Gw+HT3 z%hysJ79EJ1>_da864uASpW;181ejuZ!nP-PlTyWdK`)HXT(b7RT}dx}l1K%1!}Y(` z!ErH`Scq(rVT^1Zk-z8$7hYp|lMCZl59B1;Hvl~}VJ=0EH&IF{4U5;rWM_)`Qtngo zL@&@{B#uxL4u5i zdnL$CDaL|-qq1m4);DDbGFv`fUVjbZP9~2URko%s)H()vMGJ0q$T0Jo>!Tb)TxiEN zdJ1^U9t^`!IekTh=ehDg#!xX^InmqGSMVRr-!>uN=tVAA^+S~OxTRM6Q18o|i*8XM z_iB98M!MuzE9Lv^np`Uk>q$N#g%=1%lX#e72S)#MAkXsgVvHbxi-9B#;U#oA)~hQS zCQ_xIyns+-WYKyxbk@XA{SlTK8_r$Brq}T<*KbO{p+}N$YQHEi$;^vGU79 z*@DmIC8yrHqX&%oyox4Wh<|47^4LoD^E7*g5YfV^En}JdvE|Mf+C#u+-dSU{$Yce0tO*4Ac@QGsm}H?`vug~X!bR%R=AXV+?ZcC%4-c#-kD zUqqmQN2h7i$VpIQfYga8SL~n?U{+Ij42=(6Y084Wp!rvF!|{ej%ThWKTp!-!dL+QT zI4~Cq!a{M<$oz^Rv;`;ns#R&9c zmJeO@>j195kO+^Efk)o*AG#6s9>a$ux3(H_K4V41&ZA-uL8<-!hFGjgR;g}>X1KnI zBGY+==B=43?eW%O;cdM6=s1SyW->~4SLNECJ8PLM_Kxq%S z{pqX!^5mQft%T}g%5BA-3{ID?M(uz9)Vgd_N4&|)E*SPR(1(GfR824DvDXpwpt~AQ zG9Rp`JBkk}Ii$D)ZC}rmI~8LVQRhhKs|a(}z(D_4w9?eYHJ=D}W3yz*sWKt_8 z$&4>V9Bs=ASDsXSdV$L?7a|WR%dJ&U2R^YpKKS}{CTTRMDpST9S2V|0iS5#?bR8uA{D98LwYv>@8@RjYC##VyiNyp=V5;%}TsVjFQ-Df@?LV4~^u^Oj;(~ z#?vSn$G~8Fm1y;qCt?h7-(w<@sp%p~--tCWbG1zI-jtmYk!cDGXmfE7Mr3ET3+G_` z9b|mV`gJ-bpY39U8-HsEQ!P70mcn;5Wq2nCc}k4xej!2N{Te9WsY$=w4%1)29_+1E zhSgDaS~cchQEMD2rfSdxRXAqSFy$!m%d~4jCi9gtMB$8ROnxQv?&BRA!7-B<{}AxjyCtbv9$d{+I^g3TRoyu%>?f6mlMvEA}E z-m5Z`%GtKHv0H;uZDK7*eis?*LJm81v{yL_p>l8huDxShWvx&-K;dz3EcRwaamcmb zWPfNnn4*HwspfEhAQJ-q-VHggVuPLUvPXS74|)&(S%&$Wa<$XPo#UTsX4~a$n0-k~ z8`^)U^c)-27Ixub%HwW^D5Do?8*5`=S0a{`>PuJq!>pnjKnEyHM>~MZE~z_JEz@l^ zdpL9jl{TNBugcBo$EHGfvp;d-uFyw*T#Xjqpr-eZKJs&@gBQElzUr7SVS4J3-)gz# zIvu6u5LuEzM|sIxqQZa{d!$|Q1SvlZZ`1AM(+gzl1HOZ{nN>w41-eosbY@==a5u5|`;;YWk(aMCe z`m{}iIoc{Ut}b64dS$B^m*NfTHzeA$ah0TC z`k*GMp>P@?#P3G%8!IN69Lg2P;-kYXN|Y3+}~DR93^T!X4W9 zHh;IOS}4M48WPZF{nwW5zSObSrU`y3UTdzz!`~Y`PK|)esf5UPq{IlZX?^X$4OLq* zsckeBqU5r1m7rXhTb*L^%^N#9S!=W_BM#}P1P!u3a!^Uo0knz&C8Cy+OShygS5;}f zl(M?N3V2$JV5AWbqilF*zrE5hKyw3L8hU=fTC(eF<)e86F!QZ9v!BSOq53FK+t6w< z+w{Fm+ef?ung5C6+WdmlEcbXe8O*a9Ex2%FT@Vqp$cskHdz2a-#E%xI+*6|~^jbPp zd{u4W|EM<1Rct<`!9tThBhF?~%3TU8ajJ)SnOTs3lQ)Ew^xn`SaP*>O~>gM1bZ~n>@ z*$2fs6F>)RM101NU_N0nK(ABGbZYAz4AyBUkj|BwgeuCqr_n)Fya#S5N`$SCMF780 z0vqSL9GxnbUUirZ#DBJMwh!=SV?Yss{ohkjrMTVwwQRBD55e#z)WzdjQ?L)K`J$(H zDogrjj)cikGJ0&7&J~NP(XS>pfEupadTy=9&cff4mfyrE;qTS#>RJ0{Ia*h&{Y6Q@ zE=q!P2S^TNQpwDDT&;F?rN2NzXFz+i@^ijHkNC8!Z`&9dpQbO`ik(tL)}X<+qO7U4 zj&~~t_}8y5s%e_Jp>WnB^hXRqN?59@0EeZm=-AMvlsmEwPCNQPGB=%VV+2d^V~aC_ zH)Eqhd8tMAjN?rV1#ZejJ9V$7rAEKnpof!2LG>I=lvN|D!4Adl%^_ZEbfLC>^iV8n zt;!C~bmYca;r{mBGUWd_qdM^eG31Y(s*q^(00E()1~0Stas8`M&L_?tV&)goJ^%{x zDD%Eld&?C)Qu>ti340^vmLFkZjK?+ssRDaE`QK6F zLa?BE>IO%HAx?X1J4&P+Ox|hR52KRUj9KP~e%B5>6iWvfu`mZgxh1rr)F`w^O44sN zSF2hVdV5)S#u2?j>NW2#G!(!s?Ihd>YqKgms$HY;p&skTj*59|mJDX!VM7#V#3(;< zy1$z1M^x5e2D^F_p<0RhF=iazwCZ>rTAAd7H#&_$| zY5VjyoX3tFWNW{eEfGWW8FLV2cAa0swyAmShh5cCF=W_j)`6v7Fb(cP@}`wzc>(*&yBYasED~fdNaG4Cul1JM!3o7_B~Q|7-@KfH?v~1*rb&k+ z&5Qe~o2s>gAlvIZ?yyW=)D?HgdSGh(jX*-&$Xs7KJ=`>0|FI33M6m8_@dO3iCY}!{ z%A#G8oNb5#ZMk&JCMvc;Q)^2g8CEHu~>#(~6UOKCWG{Yud` zCWaQV)7SqF_LKgAj7gzJtxr4>xxD`4L4pH7I$G1FXq^#FMNGzM>(<9A#UMW$SNZE; znupwWy8VPPk_`@Xp78Y@2j2hn*Mq^KTP1XhR^O6fur;KQYjwb=ooQ9e0ZeVd1(Q)q z5JS&g`!7^vSv68ovNhla3z?Qui<)~0UnM5iI@7xa-lJp*bKk2b(F1w1OW{ClpLhkM zl9See*c_$L!%O`_IsP1c1DQI6aTx7)%vuKt6@CcjTI2giveV3a)Nhg&d@#GLxrGh5 zbgNm6K+{?3AzSuvP-Q+}|Dh*BY@KDK0hAJB(X{>Kgr0fYW?2J1`2uyS3Ul?4f^|cx zbe3*NBZ(((B^U}rJasf2Bj>}6OOiLELA|171_*K_AtvC3at%ePX@~$=&%aG6t-|JB zf1?(9!?rfNE>$r74*dYo+gHGxg(Pm52k+}t>&TK?rpTd$p+MkFEaA!fQw}11tCoZ^ zc??%ceb@PV@2UojU_lxpUj=M1>d5RCQd;pb6;Q{-O3R8nbNC!iV@Z3^!TEL>q!TvF zSb7lU59n%*H@JP?`u*s?&CL%>vhUi;C|-C~>*3KoH#^tbUfQ7XvVp}KUYuC+ZCm5el0`+yiNiSHm@&CdpnUh*houBbOwKDJdombh?|MunT z#c&tSRlVf-VNd28V9W8~8k;s{i5I_)^+`UGPD?w+ZZmZ|e!|NCVhz%cRly=}#smakJ=wUT90n%2$OYvSv;i{tU` zG|hU=;xFt;nyPxzPE$+@zkE%;c_2cwTW;acxm|}(-I8DD^|7fXWS{h;)P{vVD-N=H zCfrj!aU_>pw|Y|GTJa6Qt&vu@CVb!yTe3<vNZtDK6~Emh{EupI?76nIPVzR zVFlxbqKSV}UOU(9SO2+z^&h)%-LBnIn!lxwNT{jpkf;nwE$<>6;#keX_h;+3eF9Gh#P>-}r3X433f|vU;W_{wz0ze$*Knd;VO&7$fP`KmYu) zOD|*9JT|kK_J)RUUGMg6a(2S4853gDm+BwC#`Ew%*|e<|#m#2Nc#@8E>bgBToR~8$ z)jYks;^?*6l9_ep?l*t)B;}cXWyrX@<3s3d-e29@dM};2mwq%kJMOwl?c{Za(@I3G zuF1^;?snyIRZpum6rSc~{HUaT;W4+ct5fHsyRI*^`k zD%yPTS@wk(zk8~$HwXCK6#ex|xAL-O)!mzy*M)q#YPvW2c}sPWC;Nk$+jL?=#FOn~ zYT|pJ<=?#jUsvaU`JpbI>NM+KcHk&~bpD|}-Ay}JG!%yIo0$Fb?&rI~U+ zKGM5?{gG4IohzM_nYHKq^m@4>X`xEk97C3s(>J=S7$6t%tp0!-w zpma%Y(d1u81)lV;dba8?t5q|YmA5Kveyz?u4ZHd~7g_)R2o0WO_>6DchxK98ufAc*@1Jhs;JexCc6ibO`57_3 z>*{W&=gaqAE8lhTxunrEK})^-@*RSPw*=SoeLOYS;@14`z^le`W&3}n|9rOnQAGWZ z`aeI`Kgftbwg3OC_5UBO|J$&CJ=@PMytg^o{~q-(JagfV-e&vq3Cm>81n%d#s`k(D zYkSF!ZSOB9ivKnFTK)Ty-q+KW|FidAeH-VupVO2h@k{iMTl4uh-M=q0%~S5B@XhyI zHy+%V-yR?T;(AiR|GW${ZCUm?WzlEfw#?2*{Z)U@$8_G$<9l=yR@E&vet-PirdpZ$ zmf83AJhG2D^YZ6^@O|N{Ja(C#C}CjGIK>3KqneRPgh7OXgM))1%B?kehhy@kOyCu% zcYs&hf-Vt81;86o1B&tsiuIH8i@?{1qicVowWB>8s67CvT>wSz3ZN)ldtyNW=qg-v z-4CxZG)xET`Uu3J+j9}XmKjNRa%pi%el9ixo)&#`c>&aQ0cbrpLN|~l3cQayz9==P zSYHoBqT5`SvMToqP}y{#Mi~^1W~|Vglp(r-UMS54Ug!(59ji&mm$CDsm=prMbry0b zb4g`RD)>fbbY~#n9uB&%9RU_`K{cb?-j1#x`EqE`9pea~#{<<5zH1!m#&L8bknc7| zO#uCTF!v+fDUGfj`HEfCC=>>!2Q1eiqZ@#nI8p6C4djBu4>=A3yjg+43W{xRh6BLJ JyVM5a0RU@zvrhm3 diff --git a/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Prologue—Archicratie-fondation_et_finalite_sociopolitique_et_historique-version_officielle.docx b/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Prologue—Archicratie-fondation_et_finalite_sociopolitique_et_historique-version_officielle.docx index 3c437f1ec1b41afdce16e76a5c99574d02c2bb22..351366f1e852a42ed31f9ee3b4070562bd1d6a9f 100644 GIT binary patch literal 43182 zcmZ5{Q;;Aq+HKpmZQGc(ZQHhc+O}=mwr$(C-T&-9+^W3~NviUcI_KnLA}<9Df&u^l z00BU#oT|;T+@IwK2mn9{4gi4sZ&ypm&eqw))>%*4!`{S6htA!`x;c5$Hjn{99&bk))YayeUQDTEYd_&I=enc z;jd$sMGCb6cNRCRBaG#4l+6*<)Xb?Pq_)rFl^&vIBmd&~q>4xK2@K@1LGa>; zN8TjO6=wt%mS0LWoykJNhb^rRie8OxL$%R=^xM>~5bdINj=|FD&IV$H_8ru#X~XXsw~c~>qBTP6b{dJ0Tni&e zDxfN0!JHccKaZDSn7o^^@Yi7iTO^tkl5)}s2@f$vq(Cv$I9 z12phF7<^_!G7|~Ci7bI8!vhLh8>M0AG~vcVAOlEI@H8mjVuSI+WD9&Y zf&}(->29)K%mHAuk(f8-N@a87o@f-))Ewlh0##KUpYEO~b1{pFC7U6UjkqP7Y zIACwM$$=-&+_u+ zW-bfBjgzaBH(53|^l1P^SkNi&n$l;w^h_b0mLE9JL2XzArB-)jhF}gf1(R38s?+z8 z3KZcOl*qX4Ul-vnlC!1icSN{C za5r2ToYAL7;!lBzeMzA(mBgx!t;Er;%-X5cAwzBGI=GG_rpTP^e<6H~dy@2T88X@b7oOv4G-20& zg8K^w0D$xl9ydEjV|vqnUPjr#(E7iMn@-yNXR=^IZapF>UgunqAXF~NKn@}TgmNTK2{GmLqR^zAtHw;3I3tVyXvvpfIgy<~V!MxSE%qoc0SmU6M z;VebRh&p&9V#=%9nrx{VmsKeHvnw}&RquvzEbR$_X;+3E8%vRQECoQ$F`L8<1G^rC z!>sM(m-RE&_@v}9V}=f~hswJPNXc|TQG6qkC&-|7Cu?JjXoQ8=PUG-xt&Vc zL!n`(o4yZu2mb-}K7!x*)zTe_3?;)3c_Ip8JWko!w}sq1h%zJPGY+AN!|rS`g8ccTA3 zcz`G8G1cb#Aexx3KIi#Se7hGYPpUd+`TI!hgR|h;pQ!e~EP2-x@yrGN^Z!&p|1}H$ zW$B+$bFujs4E)C|Ty^WzlB~LrzVY=E5#$jfg;B*{sBTheqLC;zn8+j1D&FMyMq+!| z?ofz{k{lAN6qCQ``}yZ?(*v*h&B3Ed;koOwz%yg%1L(dj|G?_>8oy|I-8#t%?@X#D zxG-yE2(%7&ydz@bpI*f_uj+ov^?X{dqJ=U<$?W=^UfS{dUS5ivUHC3KZ{B);pW=Vt z&Ex;=#we}WRJPd-{>-`XU>wRsS@gmoAA6?%A z*=gy$bt^=EtMfWolW{a_@ENW5G-%5I()&A7W7$!=Zs6KGYw&S- zSps*v4*4cfg3Uj6Cj!qD)RJ)|8^u2D`&9V6`@X^BEO#Xz>ng+hWb~Jpx8idfnK$Bl zwAbOS%MQo2`tJ?8UGK9O4mSIAufjKOd`QoAs}qH;?}J_h{!4@Rz53)q$9Y9dx~(3HkskYZPbz;# z?6H#pm2HN@1^8Dme)^kI;LqM^?#}Bm5FgZR$?ory@4~E+gE?HoLPR_C@O7k5Y$FDB z`)n({V14}WuJUFLerX9_qyt_ATNLO`?HBm%3wJw8H$_)tCb>@guqoZkxA$45!0!51 zPnxHOG2mp@t_^kjhXz|WO%%cFfy2G-+H7>rgn;c+5PQV*q}xd@B0y*_Bh>S2;qy4j07(Sl32PJl^3VulDnJfP{ov@``i^@$Mrno3iu5&1Ez z&rP{f`Gd&L3M*UwWVy&}jH6rfCd}vSQbV+aX`I0uD!k5k;D~Z}?JoLW9kmBL9)S1P zXlqGz?e|iQL#eHu&E9yg2NgYF)5hM5Qce&(-X~za=S5y|3_lkQYdbyX+EBN$=Zn_c>3Zv8SRikwf&h zc9HfzxRw~W>N}(Gcs$+I@nRU{oT(N_PADPa_Y1z}Ls1q*AXaD_K%$Z}Z8mV06ShMu z`+@m^q*W(|K{im2jibYIA8-bV-WqhZo>Xv}Fr{f?@3XS-yA!07Y8!V^Be$9>zpg3C z&Hmkk%+Rsc@UbHNkH@B=b(U2fScFMK`-MLt)&-Vn8UBPTQTVn;hS!)qN^MlWuSnFISqnH{nr@E% zjvWW-CrVYL<&m3o-}BeCcs6zR$2Hep?Lum>gTIRSAb1Pcc1QE$RHLE@e@9sL&_dgb zyXShb-d|fXa+7bYhe6P~V6K*@08`>;0j<#fg!Gfg=~Gy)vS z$=hK#UOQLt6T>=^qZ!>`ZIg>&ELrwA$gFvVaS{^5<6KGo2a~l+Kw#?_KUHU9_A`wm z9@>rwWN0_zN0U0kC-^(1atq#;AwDgpdqYUK#pisHI5fj%=-wLU}=*+HA)1OG~s+9iggc!s69RRp`L%zSpANKD0A5bqU{B#|;^0@N!O zI)Z);Nq%?NdH=2NAaAxQv=zj|zwW5=*(Q%3KvTCq!EbD5@EV2m)#R6Wz$QGUB!N@Y znPfYlom-QoiRboHL$mj$! zaxYUj_j>@-Y6H46?Ad=;?ldIQ95G~AL~3=cTSWg#@++_3<{>&hgxA9avBw~#S#j6- z%cWl1K_jCwA#rq81{Rkqz-QgLu9p3~X4N@GjY6-x9PHf^nP;>tge%?Z{j$$!3~hc- zU@PF*fgvzI(aXj+z|8~8RCLPeF)SqaQ~IjNn(oSfd;n`bq?H~;NmsO)$HoZ&%SxPK z!zMVusy(XE z!)^w)q%=MGw0K1shDh>IXTZod_xrF8^7P=DnL2N_$>F7h2sTkG+>Y)eAPEIcL{! z+AmiO_w)v!^q`2&-Ld$(puIo$=qrRjFL`S#1^krWIz1DaHGtebVa(Btku^^`%eLUc z+WQpp>h8Z7sA;RIm7|5pX&jwAkhtGpEOaZZ3b4!9{N?Cgq3Cc|&P#bQ=Xs$=xG59Y zrH;r5VEb$a=?E4WtQoeqP*d&k#-s4l%hLA4i2{&l+&+J%zE#)rdzw0Z>MbhL~E@p;fEBLxh9$?}M$yWaHoFTvKEyg72eFNjdHdQqUM zS64SthhV*`e~{xzT^lrOgO5pjaNl5-ttCie#Qf4yCsmDfclr&FlrCQbjaVtoes9tp z(h*Wn)K@X`5ea!`K>#WS?K?k^A=+Mx|U&65sk zc`2FQKR0*3PBMr4G6;}72RH7P)D`bIB-!1uoQ_N$jP?D5qa7O|Ld)e&;P z3)K-0%-S3t05V{+cg%X3y_I7b3AB>69fGcb3K+s$?T*ZJ*Kv_66AVGE-P==gS6l+8 z-41*{TX%m(Hg|st?Ybe|_yJ-3`OBTdBNu54v%}#-q_X-cS3&H7CmR*765FW)h%XqI zb(~5EdBcub85F+~j1&zT_BvH71HHt_>2Gjlg_Qn=OJ3wNYK8a#D%_y~NH@&}w(GFd zm_j$Z`VdlVJ0wjLp}sq+A8B-PrhKcay-pYt)JKSCf=c4?fI{n3Di16k`3y?G@!kHm zz4=KEZbf_7+jd{%Rtu(CXb6daZsL3;24DKIIk?yBc+rdr%oMKxTiw0n2zQ&@BcpLm z9@NG}GMn7{gIM;nu{*vo;>t7Cc*v>Cqg^*j)PDk&eK8MsJ8~U1^t7YO(Px6)6U)ee zcmu5-_guTFJrGYp%CpLc2vPWMjWyUs;=efQOkWE-!>n9-D9n4Bq^4&>P5{ddW&sn( zF$smHf{PqKL0qKaGST_FPtpDc>mz5;2xn53vCb(K+HP7U6fu>|Y5Tv8@0~|}Wj&^2 z97kd8zH1RjbUt&9m{MdS8Hkdos~=UG3qbILa>vG1o?`_eFCs|Ln62Z!d2EFmSk;i4 zBN)J!4*K*ph)2#d3H1buZH=unYdwlDEBbb4sy$qHctC6 z5Y{1!wjUm{+LrKqXY_)uoxggsw6$6`wLZYodA9Cz`kmL>WC%5;A3{$W0>`)v6xz0@ z9}Lzw-}~650AGG2lYb9EQ>QYVwzmGf`Tf|~sB4&njy077P?$gRKAY1Hr@UQ7_OXhA6!f0L~<%pOSG9L!to zs=~dS%EvK%2NPhT&;GAc^hTNgtOr(R;CA=EKPXiKNXXG?9rv+8s-&3!Ql*uE#GZcf zVTu2A*tdsYG%xh)XpUYfM_EHm+$Q&WUUO%qn|LL_RF%c-aHtD$TT6zoduiW`&W7f>ompe-VSLrtwmD}xfKX5jX%adLQ67< zTrn7!&VDmQcj;Kl+(}45Zaip6U&gDs^n8`4m|$8Fkp>BeS zYSq0op*Z6_k@&5YJr!bC1FJhaTR3=%$=?daym}&JRd|{m%Zp3hpP?O$(yKbz+9N1Q z7gKVmF?M!GwQw3jv*v=bp1xe;DDfDgm>v64q9~H>KP#^?A}!5pJ_U7u^wGnCVjRqw zR$`e@GoEZ&Ad2}z-c+B)44GbO70Z~bv{}Vg_ZTFvl&m}`f%l@`pZ6x&4V z4CJP5xq8*C1T;4W6*`-et` zr-PS^co+Bxhbc)M=dfV|aufJ7F0Ga>>jAC>>@kmyFY-`y=@+Lw!Uyzs8CO1<=Qf{> z?zLTY_PeI92{L0k$J1+o%ST5z1)TkG(w8ecc8LJnQ~r*Hgm%vL@vozD41^4!Kc3PQ zt!i(u#>4#7(QMNl!Ykuymd!S#g9hF=%C7q~mBf+r_$!K1Nl^)U26@L!#Gv&XAPmhgqG zWv8S;XC^sfsy;6kK30eB7)jBh7b3{Jyam~T$;87+g3*5$LUXbExHi^LxL66iq40MR zc}>RJnRMT=JlLX}l&Aq)8?hcHe32XkEO4`3%?b61WaT7!s-gKOr7%Tq=5&=!8b;ai$lA*4liPY~(cj5B0{_V;yzX@s#eBIo*q_i)OxzaZLr|!g zX3XD(!_nX@C&xfL-gn#cy7CP|q&2EBV#ygd^i`+*lkyyWOcXYuX?jmFuI>d;TWvW^ zX9b!IgL>E>rGX6ghum7B<3iz+*5U{u#(=tcaW9I%lA%_s zsjaN&2IgLFozwA@V70B*OY#RTbQdK2nc^4_r4(i1>s<4y9jv)!GuJnZyRI;GugfF| z8I;s8jP)|W-Tjtw>+g{;ji5mt4U2%OfNeXGRBn4kudgdnBX!jB*``Q@` zvc{)8O!vqT8m`JHK>rEBuP+z;^oXur6R%l+xpl^--fW9jlB_D#adQRbc%QW9O-~8z z&HV)woEN`dyuE!)9v+G}uU)ORjZ@fUv7~F>W?VDk%WxAUqWS( z6T*Wd1;td^{Ffyl)Eq#yxzb=SgXrbVDIt&0`0twwrAg2N2RjRtp8R#W$ zm&-2`QguUkUOK)j%u_B=gY~xrl>U!S;ZD(C)zCJLjI-mCslr%PttAdP$%hF_;vOTl zC=p0`s`ladaSOM&So(GgA610rBAf>I|uL$R~9IOdl0cg}D@;rEj%SV=3IeKX!_`q_rjyD=T zig>G}tU=N0FuA;i-3jWi+ZpSG)v|~klw7%Mp{)+k`v&j>K_vPM{hn@09pkpEY$$sg z?W1uM1Qe;lJ_47!olLa!Qng2iQ<3=m)AlyLg=Xw2Imbk7ZjPIbx;t2BT;$R%N#hWW z-?rV+zC0s`GEZ|hZx_pY4V4&p%5YB12trFCOIT>+S&+-iSmk*e+>s(*Zg|0RzjLQ> z`=w1{W8O$xJdS8c1f7f{ZloVrxuS1_>BRtGDOA)f4Ak|)mq)aJI=&Fiu?oCjTy}Ka zUPxF{P8H%(0g(y>p0mn~s;!E)q&6#TZk(vm_|ED~r*7ze_xB z33Ym8gtCCKg|e#I&r31YV-^qEw^(q3$Aoror-WRNNN&S}8wuNNU7-vKHdEJRF3FYj zRn&UUC0M>4y4)@{`i&iR>-H>24&(rK^YR#Z_6^>|?l3D!Vitg}4qq>7RkXm}?wG%k#ZiP6?yL4wb3A;hwZdH$# z>!?8zq5*6p9>y?ePzcJbbR>tkx?h&XXT`7DpFgu}4L)7Nm{ZT%RixS-fzx{&jcJB-_%7gfdMQ}#tiXL1I?p`ypC{34klsQ{L;sWa3Ww* z2$)Y-1}@yW9wIXm!F{qa(B3g}H|z`dO&RKu*}fr%YQ zGB~m7_@!5NBt}S+fOE>!6b(!WXR{*WdafzQs@f7n>N8FX&!Sv!KFl?S{rLryQ~qOv zn?fnNKFB1P)gBmuBVxOmLYF@}Cuh4o4)sZHQ3aon3e%AKlye5}4I?az5u*w_jc<^J zsFeaaO){x!OyC>@>;u*UyivPxULUMSd`j-Z`)RL#$ErC_6IU?1cPnnm5;n=m95zh~ z1!{l-jbriQ6thUMO5%;QI)simlH+TT$C#oyc*T!cO~yiFUhzpxz(dDZ$i)dRVkjWV zPOFy7{6yVFi2dlh~NUc0E!M0INpRh%*e?Tt+F%!yI>NPwS}-y{nJ3~ctrdZVBtln34FLR+{% zyK*=`RbAQY_(Hi;Q~*`<3rhYpx_ZVVdDwAT5tYcGT9kTTFee;FE5pj>vX=b-v^MJPtxc(_SfC|hm=aU}8 z)a1$hk3@!ohrBDBYC)3>y#^=IW>C!Fa*hS6v7~q99MKCNlHzEvC5R4HtR=;mD6?A1 zvdS;__U{Oj(m(-@a%5MI@8KNXYF6D2CC3dxd`Aj#S$<(JgUYPneeQ{;8lq-fNJ%3t z5z}%>|NO6oqC7z}ML^!(@*P`h3LQbQQO;1(TznBj?o|}-7&zqI5)1lAWvM~K#~}-I zffGk>l+A0ij(z|O%D0g~f5($zlxEvq#45F+f@6NP>8$*#sj#~ge-7kQhJEo1oO5X3 z$kNMk{h0<(k9Q^2I58oI?uFS690vd+ZXZkZzl<=S5aZlH{veB#1=mC_W6Q6>Yg$$K z7G+X-D=S8mnpXP#aVjTC@}T?LgoYqQI9Mfz_w(SLwQ{L^u|7^18=hH#->Q9=HUlc0 zEjgV8c4NTEJ1v~COpirm7_gJ55#apZ>dhs^bS|?bW+I$i2{# z`ChHAfUG}`_b2!*2buf{{A30pc-yz*`3B336SqXaNJ@h1xA@JagZ3mhO5i30a?z0}n?RteW>Ami$BnAjal2U+!Kd;BWCMrw zTov?-3>$d;Y^WYmYc9%z_=!5FZV@c!SREudy7Jg%!w+p?`_oF|Vv`hODi6+6t$P=8 z)HAWIY8JST^N&g`Sf*?hc!G!B&;28799nZmUKM&fk}%`Muy|*4ll8VlUG~Yh42=iX zMgdwy6S@Xz;kP!L)#Oug1P(=`JLR>?`;17k1!+Sd41z>`xO;hm@HxFdU_+))qUpHq z72I7A7GK-pw6wbOq7J-D#OHU}XS+%CB!9;Bb^qC;sQWaB#pK-HK6-__EIm0Dnd9ey zyabn~m4ZcJ6eNp*#9RR7psv*=1~n9m@Yv6gT8pYVOE)R) zoQ>ntj(G7{MnaJ=6xxb=;<^h>F^m+h7l))){RCD^vq+X2YpM7oRjS~JJ^S|#Lo1Gs z@7qYBcJAtW`lnDr(x8t~gmP!>A zAK%m}bnb$xZz!pkxnR`6mZP39kaXnK;S+`3=@ZQcs%Mr|CC9s4@0G`n7q<=Mh`j=* zlFZSWhy$)=k1`{Ql0PGH_JXPG1A!T7OAH~h9s_cc3gOki>|payiU+)j+45IgcY7c9 zFNx`!)b1mFQAB)6rnwEOmsF9|5PUB5eNGj`?2IufRr8-veMn-zX}gtSM|NN(|&LPAo?qh%U7Xp`h2std84 zO_&SHZIjeAT0#%7Me~I3*$X5cDn=2+klpJekktl!RS^+e}KTT)Y*=*6jV)1+D+ zx}C?MAO$a-;t4`o>rz0N#pV}r7=>jBS2~3f^%*iTDxKq{{QV%%b)7IZILX_7y!f5DbbCQRXbb^mf5Juz4j>(==z zoq6J4;dTUh(|3zo*okTLMSIS%!-yy>RyPPj?nZ6n`$lX9kkqu-l<6_8HMVfDfoS-eicT3F@)D|#*c4{=M@A8ah z;jMEqXlksK^GeiNU7yZ|NXA}Rv~zPMQ>B^gOR08YcKIdP8Ekr*u;FnhYGg?YGXJCkmb zsk%sG+OAH*>yQYdALh$+lYhO52)7M&+v>$KPt$y=eJh{C=p{OJBMqug*N(RL$SVCA zfBpp`kAzIV<=9okGiMeb5zW=8IQE&a-+CA_2)8EP6Vw?D_e@N)RgD8fMRTOA%Bm3>@lxxRXp> z$Lwl|eJd z7c}ixyVlKtp{ZDWljs#jx{<#XavYZ$iJ7OAa&F!&ZD@=E4w`7`%t!<@stL~=W^QIl zU=+SX?ok$_qi0x{+r=r{&d%90nQ=VQxk%i!H#`iRX%|)P!eZpSzMQuwwR_&Q(T_cQ z#5YLGA!F1YY?Cr!(y%4x2Jad>2CqAr`*Wk zsOW!Lhx=C;Iq(9_tFj>hUordzUZkPlfwuhPyD!2^sW_I{INWfnf%^yX! z9V_JE?5DJp%lE~+^Tfn;(wrUE@_ZcBO-}6A8s$HI!jC(Q69%5{motgWxQ376n;>)N z9PMbORm&8`+!+KWMRj_uun=t*K2`f)Fub;wnHe{8T29xqeM1V8mQ{+{hQvUBRVGeT zf8J*$DE__m8jx760ye1t{pT!gl65cX^O9IKLDlW@%UR+?_&Dsw%PZ@{#C5{-S?8m! zkzB;8zH_0{E__)YH0pPn#sYm(>i@D}(iIB&uLvL*c|^a2@qgV>U(s`tS7tEN8Im}# zR<^L1kyCL~vx2>!fmEQo-%DRUSP*aI34s@FD1&qvQMsXQB-fX7!+{RJT;iJqWSJc8 z+gAC+?Z@*Xz7WQF^U4c22!F3`K05n-T%|y}1Dl>$2HMCs&y_H7uLNv!9c`l}*;_DR zf+r>oQy8>uaNkSLGt3|XXB$WoyKYO1TUfZmtn7fb4Q&QHL@MooS3K^B2rii5Wu zRpUyHj0cE~>=l>6w7|paXz51H1Pi${Q6CSg)Q-0f9>fXeriS=4t}EZS$mN{nZx5bp z$;xrjsHY({5JryD2}uO6C8O`z+!Tt$AIDG34%n5gi655RDK>o<^#^pYI+@XlLrG+2 zEhTj_#=5&Y+~>ypd*08MBI_^4sG1iALpjdJEO!g(c!tm=Vh;$Ta^~44YDHKehtMin zKjb$p!l1q7uJ`42tG(dEZfkOu`zL!^ln<)reQgw3=Q>$O=f1WQJX9E(Emp4|AhMH* zg!kocx60WN7+*$LVryFp{oJ;Nlcae^*n$3eUy>kwVNUI_l%q)Rw3Cj?t^|eKJHN`Z!W9wa%aF`GIT+(+3inYhgc!BxF>kG?wkkI%VvKe*b+3MCk0fworwYaQ{XE1*AE;tM7Jh_~LCWwO@i5Sfy*nFnnVaj0sO%%ty@)Gv| zOV}eeR3B+%OQUm5H=hPZhB0g+$R*88109iNm7~83l}^U7CD(mX#?a2R?lJAWdnANi zQ*AdjL8>(#Ne(luQY9$(EC}YbzFTGXYdBRZ ze=~U3H4im2)$uD4qFen6nQuZGSRbHHAmi&jg+Oe zsEEs7VsgU}^JMVk=c}b1DOndy)A}6mDg5qtHJo<}ie+ky7LTLMp=CaJEHy}I&rnAj z3v;r5{Bkf1$Biy%@B0rL0UqRZx@0`tt{sOY_yy*~T#74`hDpot(F| zGi~-CX{>erO7Rx~D7HQUEWJ{x3C0;XDr|RIW%ZB%DoFDwjoPicpRj>uJCSN&<-ZSaWbDqWfvsqL3%clwyO($qvImYq4z%^+=FC zoCPA#lIzB@GSpn>Cj^(Y%lC@ll1VxuyWi%9&P4Wl_24oKyE6H99GlU?o?tXloFQl~ zcIt#X9!Y_3gkobqeED8TYdb^XxGhrsn4YFX!hKMl55d|o&2r_Bsvt|tCa_}pD*w1f z+Yct9C*6NC=?xNxGO#Xvc)Is-x+_^#@T@I9Kr(QYLbRlkb>`k_6p`aDg&^*fp>&g= zXw~ykpi9M>95QoJ>zU4l4%*&jwtda`t?veCl!?$9%TrtB19+H74@Ug*b-oh`~=Nct~x zvr~4kkArA46qA?EpjiG-}8$#5Wq2wibdC}%@U z@EnwlyQEsBSrm{Y9uUxY!C|~mD76h($!jh%YB486zTdXpa@<$o)B75)lLIX*q?pdo zGE@oWsuSy0>gTaMy39c#eF;WbFi{T@<`T?MC#`aaP^i5qDu5oZ%0?vQ%4l)agNaxP zL>l@;i!@A{YtgV< zS{OZmqPIOgApo&xcvH@WNOZ+lah`UIP^m!GSfn6?RBV)&{WnaP5ZmDZG*P{lYx0Rv zWojTslabduNC%6n&ZoMf*P^Waxy&*n2MQKXxDt7p#IA(aBvgnSq8m(^0D}uXq zAppau{w?QOj6ELZ*oA51IT9H&|{h<7!)wAh__Lwyt;JIzC@xgJD>H^5|A12#S1nbMOa`y@=ezk z%!X-dgcJA*3DfVjmNii5RM?+okoq)(^hang;ko0HTO|LA^*!f+TV9*E+{S@8K$b|| zJNrJ6=ZKR`>PBrVo#kQ6Oq4OB!PH9hW@e6p&No;!9ox#g=cI_+Yg7r(V>^f~a8?ZM z)vBUr*iRA$DrYX3RQFKATymjJ&?BP(gD5~ye5F3C#%(F`V3$vWN>IY&C1YJdPLdXC z@?)Oq9J2Oxt$8=U1Uy?J9LJK$8P!b(EZpr}>TrkX4NwsC4{~^e^A4+zd;$RP#YEl1 zgvyo&YP)_1ya*x#>nRwpARb-_%;S@IcIsr5GVLKh>Nie63^`sl&M+iY{heC#tXN`l zqlii010T{KiPCYXm&?v#jPL?s+O$__*kRe-Ha_!65@Ie7LN1u3u1Z zH+MjYNF-x`CjP~vnY+r&6f2;0wwQj^GESE)|)U17J`8dgpY-$;T#qa>s|N; z3C6l$vMz#OyU{%ktSm_AVX+fTsl#jVvhO5XGzyz_Ic)5jqRt*9U^&2n$fqcrhO(4} z+8x$x+Za?uo0%GFi&OLBjqo0JHOLaw{<_;gsv_QNHhEM@8*U0ihF;B`mPdDyAO1>c2;I8jp8^$zE4gCMHg?OZ zq-Fd}MHMxkFI|8=_On$RS-Ka@;RM*XTgMqKCkvdGlVFf&e9Lvr^;sxh!4%gM^if_k zwQM5qP(F0~Lsx)N=7XEEc@ZXh|sxwpQ8t%B@G|n7Zp@|pV{G*R((PCb*n7OCwEwOh;tjh zwQ(3@hd+-vbUD>5czW-9`4P@x8wt~l20{xq+9-2qRidh`>l4}KG=hLdb((j>%*8|q z%{_r(L-HC3zj3xTWIVbUK0}0tq~z2S2Z`ND4euO~|C)^$mhefetCk#?a~ z?&Hn54C|Ir2kxmPkTIJ9S5%%5mgxv@Odo3L+7mHu!_N782zx* z`YU`0Csgpd{=g8~IyC7Pk?Z!y7P8o~==hK&w3-%l(+^HHQ1EDWb!dz`Wg)tO<&RIw zcdapnO=ilUaMX|vd%L|Bj1ey|^e-pn^`rtrXm!%Ee$;3Vfp(%Jhag~JwrquI-^%W1 z^D?%Eg^7!b_92z5iIgNG_HS1miE23Oa78 zRqWn??amB#9hiUSB6vAlVTe+{YFC55+|AxWXpxcxUS`c30ADIgJoj^pqvI=Bqwyoq#RkiVKv_aBLFmmw^%6@1~o zoA8~hJQjQCyA?VZRH9Y+Bybzv4_Y2c*LJ;fyBa)izD2nxpjp|bCH@aVK)$~oD)57x zHj|0D=XWYYS=5_iYfSFzy{CfD$Qv~0E_Zrtuviq%;+hC<;4(Io1#9^jCR7C2dBI|U zt*v6s*~nCs-%S`b)&8wGez*380Ua#dm0rOP_ch3=;9epTvz4(lmGAf4%7U%nJ zV%m&iko>91ooorVXt?~KdXrW{KSb@V6f7^%ZE!#x@<_5rlPUN)iussu@z~t zJk7PdnGG7kf~*#4*^>E_ZGsO}n~5t?_Uafp%DLu+u4KcGY`ckr-33Vgk?lt0((v3T zS$zdYYP#`IOfF0jH>Qlx2h^>&%V1%H4Wnazg z=^5>&q}@@*na|4`jV9rn=cCVSMBarS@xoa*^LDltJbtS6(&s-NF(gPjT~*1fxosPPUB6!h&Ay5lcKp! zv30|*46j7cpSX`k2IwD!Rs(sR-*;bLqY&SDg306c8*&zs?J1)P*OF|^L~5Q;Yd%B} zk7MT9ZkjS<)T(7yv8b?JP$SABjiXIppPSZs!TxQ{dJpmr=)Xs%^_x#tP7Ua z5)a}sb%lXVk=2;uqzd#gOY@>W;)42BZ6c>2m*q+=a%J2qk$}IfSeUc~n^KJ2F0tOH z-U}Qn4|$bJH{9q(>Vbhq|H%c<}zc*S6gKRhf(Ql4Qjwo+hL#r%c5zfZyYk`^%*w3pe) zw^fxdsE6FQP3rvMj?3lmmU2b*q6WQr#e5m2e>*8J-gJq0I)pZOYv9D@50ZlpWYHoK&LkIwj?DCR>y1r0QBK2AT;+u^vEA}6s2~UP9r&QH{AYaN*~c!&3cJHocD~}ewmfe?`U~b0{W5lP&=x@PPM#a?sN&^G zYLvi+K^+F>? zaPpG6kJ<^BByk2Ifo90YWHXIa^%!3a-d=5jJ<2MGl0lZ4`v!M@u)8?ZC-du7xrj6) zJY>Qo%1@8g@eD*8mH&dkf5tZTxN1Q=W|CQLhPVqX3y7YT7eQOVF6l9(iR)Se!_0Nd z*jHata%O~@)?;uZ6H^hsiUb%tfZSPjJ17MJRSm73=}>J)L-MIasUI_q=VWi+7<>wr z>r9RfAu2DxrjgwiC0h+Y!BBX<)fTukad-~LUN;!CPQ_#~?IN>k5U+}(>(u1xZsq4= zmwm|kRH&oCNyW<9NgY+%b|jfL0tQPq_OP<<|5Joat)~!M43J)Dk3ayK6Z5mQ{&S*Vt^` z6JC5z?Zz>$YocDW8$j7o>PXV+&S%^qteI@u3EAPGLr0RbPw{?{3c9)&BDmKeuPhh6 zMP$Dq*V4B))bm4%O zz)G15OzM*);e()vQbOVoIA+T#7Nz^GEeO4_0 z|M(yO+yC)5o|K#c)j+8oo!r#{0l#s-^qK7DX*q-Yy1E+F=qOyej@1|A1{bZY<)Udd zAB3UQ0beCiW6Zs~qw@wb(p2qiM8p-c1kPNo)$4VltDW}Wc*LZlR z=Jf&!;QC6nEsv%Y>iKlr8fg<1V3n2moJJ9KATPbAHSgYBNaFA}E4?!YQLhclX1y^X z&Q_7y%=|SE(k?WaTT!awyV*#?J963l?MUs_0nBU_L3a=bcj#?Oi6JzX9$vhjh?e-# zy3wj>%oM%13e7FP)1TZmdGlCqI-A#tCW^4!IyBI6h2GWFtzFRNF*>MI<~7S)>+2k0 zlPUX@rK63AwBRbmglkp1JSf4cCQcKFoG0_2T30BdVH6~Dk`eI81rW8R11w?yD`RnE zT+`@D#lrR!tcQjzf6de{;@ts^k%XF~!;<@>q`6p3$Z>`z(G^)@k~t=Tx}_l>T)HNb zuV@fA^SZ%SZjM!+vS4Z~(=`X=wDux$Ij9Ke&ESL4)RDPQDl2KcG+ASKg164l(NmGH zNiw3k?ov-pCk^CItXkoeK=bC|3Z9Trgx$PE5wGAaO`l{rfi*;_IG zB%_A18p|)aIZ5t8mhw^fmSOddS{X-WAugcZgKffT4$VO`h<6oH2xTmAz(`RAPb}v} z9MF>Zu?}QTIHSkKhmCvf1N$eACLfy}Wj)Bj%!RRCsj0`I?UnbV8@spfsAjKWsaZo4 zQOGzD%m!FB0#JguH%hk{Szpa3x8i2Md4-xO?U^}8rQTmL;FK(HKHqeJpb{^k^EP3Wr?pFQR1AO1doT9%`L55#T!buh zQOqFLDhBI0GjzWihAOF+Wm^5E!`Fj}91Yq{tXk9lv^7mQ04dou?g(1d@-L)MaOq~o{KmuXPgUkZeaFVdlbp(ZVY#0 zXRwXriG`<&cwU1c=Oh^ZKr8ivvsN#0Um3u9%g)O*RP?KUcTb-rY8@Y()9X7|ulZG- zlV=-oBG3cf#CMbo0eewiXnt9mK@?|&oD}`CI$&X~cTjnK?HQ*DtDIDBy3*(h7V4Co zqT@~YS5EMZBX&@!vJU#g99D$0&GW8`r8CCKQ>kkOk9%WR65eyZsgHqoS!R0EMZbW-x-=-ItB65L zJ{x+$X1Yqby-|Oy%$WCb#z+_C2g;0OA>WcKA~vQJ-uHtpR+4dnooU`UI|$e4j2^s&S1Vfyacym7bafP5it}pXtcq-AI8*9rK(eiz4E{<2Fw5fw zWikS(X@)Gjkxf26&0?8E$FQ8L|>6$jLm(mP^4+Qaaf}PvW65J)-qjUA5g2Euc`;-h?#ESs-8mP!_UqD z_IHQ+=t;#lJ@+Hbqf(8<6HT@*gk?Ug^C8T0i7QKV1k-`ahI;vSIS~+W66k1~)-^|> zYBPUBf(q7bY%Gz|I@sKyLusq!Gi5P9xET!tW#AoB91-G>g&NLlbGNMRmy|n3VOp7G4j0AcDrdlJyMm3a?Hf((+&h~9 zZhB)-28pcmoAArxd*~tM5QU5aJ|*t4J_f`6OQT>DV?gPJi27i?Egl;@E;ov1y|!k~Xrl*Z{NnGM3<> zBgMRGsBOKbZUNcOdKz@@o)OQZMM+Y@aVXv^ecX`c+t5c?pYBOd{xXp-GWy`N))Y#x z2CfE1{40jWe2*+?fOP6G40U6A3GVUhver2leNgptiM~2xh=8~LUCerOnHUoTe;!cr z)6vn&z1D!bbII3YlRW>RvQ{>Te&;j+tM_?##J;Vd9G10M_*5+e0O(*7rOCP`NvU~W z&3C|6VX3LGi58gf(xo2G7s%dD4J>61?o+1qr4i~cG+j6w4}~jSV6;OSlKLSEXrCwszb&Wb1@cU%-NXWRDotBk$lQ@ zL`;jyRQ9Y4;?o1XYlGWvtm+|68Z!#{WNAbiK=y7n!7~*Jo=-O+Q4rIoecFf?{`y?P zwN#Jxn{*yeO^PHJGeX~zSVI@>T4hsE)*ss-rtwFMHk_jbA`cz%UNt@ z3gLZfEk7nJR=Qw0ca*9h{OEg0ls!(Y!JsBsqejPqV7^0T+d88IP)AXNQ|}EdBZ;4c zrY@DQY-}DU=XR#=;7$3Cxft|VvEzqB{%U_pc;iA4FG3dYRAv=Bw!J4uE)Qu-2@%X2 zQ#p|UeTs)l_~2qLjd&;Epza^V>fA$R?bgZt>aOAei?EpL*s$9iW4DIe-*#cG{SNJ^ z_Tk;e?I*?0`rRupU_Y$U_f~yt2lb%%BC8!-0Wm=RFz-(Id6)X#A&P8F<1DgVk`8E` zoTLK>S=7>A<$Xnu%7U-0)I0t96>rCYQ~z*E1fFHrhZ( z-1=&!p{Y5@SQ~XbX&d$?uhlpCz+;uRaCvwoiDE{#4mNUCXjQL~K&9zi<|V4@TTAh_ zqd*1j6BWX#awu77O(sy6>&wT?k`julA?O|>edZ!-Cy|_B4NhwVIAy=I!S$aGu_IP) z7E_C;s`3895ksdeJniSyL5sKR$%IJC7`2DlVzDN%#T6=9zzpJfYpMehYNC<4ZLWx7>1Qtz z(=WiR2YTjY;hViw0tG!u6IDC44QMIIM3}Ih%Q(3r<5dCEF=(i=sdU8IGKw{H{AU7R zt|(fE47!uwzHUhES7n}U<4vG8%}o7VoY)dRUw`-7)C8k)2;=Ik?q}QDjM^nPtLm2n zZvc5T3aKJHFln%)r5KUDwVRHk=bTNgAH2j0PPAKVrZ|K(QY*WijN4PT`@`G&Treab zVsz02=}Z6m{pkfHgbG}98p8k}6j>5x_$ZQCO;jqE`0{Mc`WIZg?@{3=lj|b5?wVsC zR1y*G1wtkBXn_G9T&((M)LR2e52v-K zVlY-)bbPF2bfvq|TViyzg^YnHO3B(yI1T@tMut5_SbjVOEY)8RCtA`&=G*bGTk zuFfix9SGhS_&Fc6;CUpfHDfG9ovUwzZEdWirmE9Y zQOU<^(9LXh3KEs_CIgFY4*S&CeVf|OT^VlCH&g0_?@epx|TrejS zEA>$B?a4wivA$_ATYdB?2(ge}x)|y0r@8<*=qKt1x>2;;&IM(c(8LfZAgY~K7fEeZ z9Grx7Zy!F%Y+UBFyD(2fY|`9&6Ae0^PHJ?&m~2L*?P^&X^R7;bpiL?_6#wHa#;^EE zU)>acF7e>d6t7HK<gVD$57;WR&CB9B>N&~jkC&D2PMq|22(hU25`@)DPY%YH= zR~CG3;!DmJnH$Gy=E24jdRGX?GkTVk5n=t4vf3JBt)vV9%}KeUwa+K8)?olb7qPE4 z`J`jR=g94e%iP+4`31rjDN?5y;Fodk?8lBVc0N|ZboIl<>iDT}jm73|3@7Hl(Tt6A z&4GcWN>IEa4xL%Budtc`R+1H_b5__G|0!7mI?acDu^j03^UfrCwOmJv$TWEc5mky2 z!%%&WqC7?_R+0o6qi0xFCYJ}yTJThe0~k&Abm%e3Bv(SkNUAPGS%*s{Z&Ni)^ZtQ$ zzTM5xs0s-t-OjuV;&I!i?&T?opDf;pLsEc+W8!HwYzS%eZCedWz;jo?d;4aYj~&Wt zxtZSC;1reuBtwnTe8#0Z&(2n7CMPJS1Q}!;YU1dTC7+j(-D=}dBNgC%=_6icU4uaQ zKu?ctUhGJx)iokpoGWKj#F}TIN>c1R=Yypp`dUhRHK}|IMv}$v;G#6ot)5qx@rzN5 zR$R){FHcpw=d-bS;`YUvxVsBdt_5Ck1~YYaVVbUe95tjl8lQr62rN21Qd0#-u1mw1 zeyX9SlTTb`TPGey?9S=tXqR3HPL;|WLdLD-8QOx&r8|hZ%{eVmQ(8BA)YpTh2#3xdShDa8zs!{<*amU#q#o<5)p?H;Y1?8 zu6W1w#X%2!)MVFgBXIgAQ{Y037z4y8$Dfs}To1XL?2k-VSvFp$^XTGKzvI)ir$OdM zuugRyM@If?KG?xJ#g!F#7C|JQ0x39k5N8^pydi8Q1sHN70RZu1&GR%NDlG6050jvt zr`HDcaLs}8W-XU=zf3;<#dPXUB{6DyuPmZ8*GK8_Im2FJCeteB&d58LE^%j0)>l2L zkn}JA*T4SffBE13^?&}C|L0%-CzD`{nrd<*pyXpRK2a>aTuLTI+0k-2OgY-dYIC5O zF|`Ptz8Sf!7`4(y5&l;nePa$PcP7-4}R1!?aekyvUiSaVTWua7bN74w0xucJ91%v(clF zih0r%+wb|}*~G=8O$C{r$es;TF-5T+fEd=4Y2p!DS7W<{af^)qnLHaOo7GE&g=LZ-rn_!AO?YCMPErR)<%LAH$)OX>sSX1{;CnuRnWhy) zXdyxS;AZ*VbuXw!m>JJ|p~Ld}Jk0VQ+8{mO)u`P|7Ep{g`{eW5Q=)QYXh$C>mk)qzTP4g}G)y6yYLB|R_YwGbM=Z{v zdbEUruxQy3@F?}_+RHv6h}S4h)f88afrJ3tk2GR)I33 z0VpsT^b?6baE1o{KTxZbDH6Sg(+n;*gP}FpJCB}DJMoKHMvsbgpQlLcq;Nx9U{QU! zx_yy=G1@#*GYC#|W*xlNq>3b)r4F~Z(X{h)`&%Dpe~DY-UHDlCy-g_C0EcO=VA4){ zw8qhMgfXNcathJNRh#^gbF!^7-ajT0HDu3|Y=%!pceOoxd8~(KKaEL{K2m1H(j!8? zk3us*il9@WvAWr}IwagJErSuYv}4l-fC2LvM8XxgeU0pFsaTTa64+7+fgsM zKaxLV-h-?Nq8UxDv50~hyDj=%zh%nAicN!|SRr-mrG*yZ{PjG!D7sKvC!J2|B@o_l zy0Jd{OnAGQROLW0F1#NmM=NzUeeeoM1}e)1 z5>2*BIs-DZ5_9Ln@bo@TeX5cXFJ&w|m;(8o8Lke>W-M;8T|VJ1D~@F_ASFao_%Sjr z8&fnM3#IXerXKpS?)O?GdU&XWot!Gy;MMUE#d}_-K_n;Tk5RG_N--gunM!KF6+bqx zbHV4Hrr8UdV*<`f_F>JxvC6zJ)6Sg_EUlWznmr9Ue2r}HNt{`?$INyv zkMp3e6U_p) z-@tV>MvyHznSg0RG5zaU;auf|0H8s+FdZY3zKw zP^_F+DH@p6Jy><8S(%^o!&Q(t;0J9}agh<7xQvg&Dh=bPysBEle!u$E-}H1ML(L5AVa@H)3-WpVlP(^ zSdOG#GXrPLS22s*-M*+g-PuFfNaDj0=MQd_d_)TLQP`9_UrFw!DDLZ(*6U-QX-Ts;b$zhiPg-<%7n}I9)ftBHiJ<49;G*SAAQdYtv zdtoG)-m+2J6i6skS&>XpX_FE69DHs+Y$azJk*R1RghfL$Jq03)8LoT#LNW$)|FZ=3 z2+Ov`Jca+ z{tlP}>j3sn?F8=5=%lV8)Ff3hM`BlMP!S%jg=+A)4&QP=7cI;;sbwLW5n zhds`$lPy#DOWenNID_AjlRC-H6ML{~$3_Hb6HH1PNc-K?}{Qf}q8Aq|mzm(6W zOA1IH1&1#M$H+Fgv4*oRe-iht%-LFR3VX^eh{>C3q%2&VIXhWO^R&=j9JrE= zSIu?8QB}>Y8GVz-y0L78&93P*)RIVTj55|EJJ`KYu`Dc)F5u<^PH$hx2UMGG>E7e% z#rpflb3aL-6FL$qW}Z?7kq}r4qzwohqGOIy-cb)BOqsm5f2fyh07xHWpFFo;2r?`$ zm!r<9zu>c9h@HGbDh}WVEMPz91zoV?%-~EfbfM?`g;w2Jq$6>I$Y9CDDgJP+5;<@N zs$Jp=)qQGj{b`uZY4P6j7^0Xuc}ECtNOe>>x;r~rk%2=k*VZsem}JHX5`8HVaPnm+|v_^_`5a(d1Zk3 zB!6hSZS17VwObGtfKkTqLOiv?^{#6>6(8R8qZo*)_)qgye|>GtY~m;+Xb)-jfjc0Y zDr>n^aR6CShtRaG&O9)@VoOd-M<8rX!UL0nrFVoo1Sor}59r7O*@@5RZu{uno4GCi zyy}YQ_yl2;&;Bu{LFCyfo~gy{;;MH8TT06HfCYQ?BvK9GIfp?aal2O19X!c9UY%E=?(%G1CCPb;p^k8J(#^AT| z4qol6x*-qcd+JCzD0Lh#aYA&YbFPBdJ~0qRans2p&8$xa{O?h9Jdsj!Dq}UMv+8`g z{|Y$4RSSme`xU;cp?*GL%t1tq0-_#(5nl~jC>=tyNkW^Zrb;y8>cntWT{gf}Ogk3H zGkGaK&yle1Wu`o!*Hev6N|mB0@=1<|w>7nZ@|X*q0e(asun&!Ji^o<>8~^-=8@?M_ z-|w}{TPcs1?zYe{$m#;SeT#-4^a%f;HIGdp2;(`;+IF5Axj2ocg(QbHFhf5Adx$b~ zZ7|}Kud$>xz#%}(~9%%5sS0zdn^|GO$3p%%|uiI+pMv?`m*iQxk4RIWzj2O#7Yw2#rsbpxk{{#$) zT_97&O?4<}slXQ%xr(cKvt^ww@=@=@qqG%1>#jJRWkajBV}qHEtHL&d47D*HA$rU5 znY}F*@@c49sqjLy27(-*!0lDB5ZPS0Bk_-s5{;P(L)?aHtMgA~jdB{%BDiZ7gR9bj zb^n>$7f0GSu>eK2mqY(NDe(hHH-gC}7Jov|PqK4%UGD`kTEC>A%?JUZ?6NL#F|U%Frj(vkr!;iAyU-0D2kN6BJ<~ zt68>yOC*@Qk+zs7VgkpYA_g3*G@C6a0jKQGBK0_J;tcI`9;o{4^*`i*Nu9nda=81- zD(4EbtI>-uCx_Im1aPA&ntwkoOJl$ z)tHtTA=<3}7d3(LP z^bMsa)0@U<(X#?EO~Rn*EF9QbpBa>5jwXyA0du~NY|1aSd8#@Nas(E4?fn<3Yw(Oi zIB|0}v!P^|7TB`>#AG7Z_X}8!`733nS*QgxWyRv=aS&&i(qvL)V)`?~7^g|wF*JCc z&0#*;ux&*FG&$@rE(8HS`yIyZ*wli>a#rG+wLL~QbXB}BTMuM6qCEMIE!l+l=1(=tEM&LW)!tU`C^-CS-g@7q(>%E#3qY0GwYB{?J< z8F3A{H)XGLunrXX1P1fN6CLUrm|>oji% z2+0w+Q_00RI9KbQQ(gQB-W0RfS|4~ixE*-aAu=vlC>kweL##EMKTHRtgGi4XZ;&kS&?UJlOChYG=#7}CNTA>9p5@qwWj=iVy5%zAZ%Vk&xv#a=t6v+MI zu0$9pLu~%}ZxKQM|8f&wA}QP$)jgY(&W7`t*Hsm{7OwX-XW7BwT12z&VdOgC~84g%x$Ngg0ICdI>5h8zG9 zL`BX4Qq?iFFs~&(J%5Sf!4k4GJC^n}#H=9>)s=mcUS-Ta8v6-j zDGzZg+V%5do=e$ZYXzZNfMzM7ii?_28FOs1k9n2EVo*Ln*u}h{U1}3F8zf6 z^QNi`2Ni}=Eeot|_F5sB9#pCd&H99QV+SriZ=%S^7ERGA7Mm!vJgR)?m}vomd*RuG z7Bgdz=fNUU&3@hk;KKR~^JINniY9nPMP-voKUQ9_H?sMxtjsSgxM*2wWEY_IR;zz{ z!Ig}Kr6d+Vkn8@DH4}rr-Sb@P|DBjf#!oK_vy}~lP6ejaPIeYuxLU%aA?Hf?T|%;} zcrZpb(JRVj(js^zy>iv}y0_^Nby#k>ls>1`t{hN2dyFkePgM!-(?G2}2xpH(3!8zz zFYAqF_ep%DszJCAUDZ9Nav>oGfU<&ZmO=#b@0c;mA8wFAreAkU(mDwk0lL{tbSKnq z^Ec4~NtWCwQ`TFDi1(OPZ^pegvnnAS6*2yW--#m6hkkBZM`2iBx|<0&@BRv#3}C9f z($vivfRtvb%wA;D43e+oEDPcsIS8JOJ1lLiVUD{j%FT*nje2XxI4*brhL;8ARz!{X zo2K@uo>?u~BucY!nsCGVbXNm7{Gl&4rju-SIP%jT8Paa?1WhvwII1tHR2GnR)$tZ! z)K)Zw;K}1$uS z8u#FLcHLZj*S&IUW6`uK^M?N;`=%P0NBsI?Y05!L_QvTDY__04x~7{VZ~Jp>fP)G= z5{XJ|b0IFKaSB=dEj zZL%{B64vTjGrF8fzF0bgKs4H|Ok#?*D$49H+ThjS$K?exk(;h{%%64+17m%dRPM}* zi3-oBi3fZ@D|4Z;32aLLp^o%y&Acrr+p!22PkBt@(4!7dkgGy3yTvY>mD;Ff4-hZg z7NEu(v z0N^k3%elVpLuISeh3+b*8w7FI3jV0eJPBqv1NLU3eK!)eMs#;h0LH5&eMZxB!c9n0 z#Vp~jdM8a4!e|rJP>HH=3*my4!B+?B^NFouK?IH6Xxyk#mwV#Sc76L>og1*uV&2H* zq_nL&%oJUEPa>02ts@2YUVicqZhi!H=-7 z%*~iyvQREXVw!|a%$R;Dz4^%qQt9ts-{z)(oOc+ zJW+-$6~}X&p{f<{;#kHn?I~RywpAY8{_0Uy_}Hv8r4QB6 z7#NplD2krt-L{i|AZ}cpl|dfEBPTX3q{rN|xy($Q#J1Ae=Dx!PWgRQUT8vves=J)S zz-!4)XgrFy($G;2Q&`vpFSyYesmK|PW~cEVg>O5`1muD~sh_FT(ofF{@fc%IO9z}5 zp_b{;D75%v8l)H<$%AaRL`$h~#$j|8YO+ee@#X#?l~&;GpZk5};A@!dD!!yV#QS}r zj-&X9N3B!Vw5zA7ZJadJha~T3Q*aWNS!objHqAjbr_@I7Zz9vG_%URa!kf10E{w{L zCfn4SSX5uj66}BrKiExsX```d^nI{=g&?-}Df25$PZAVNF*&?>fmF83)P=RM6nBhR zoSlW@@T)$WP?MQ^5e-8w#Vc`0 za<{F0l!A!I_}3lDkiGc(o;1TcE>4z$s(N6%DpLE8 zXIZNk?@Bsp>}HH|vau11Xz(5Dgd8K`D-!rB?Ze|W|KS$Q3EXf-E7lHa@~H`gg|)5m z3?u5xQOL_!h;@oQX}H%UjA=t6=rZ4|BOJ%o8=ns%mNxTb7Yw&e<^wertKF!4ujAD(z z%v2&!GUC{)euIAiC!7kKRU_LDT{QY?i%{I|dTM{ku8Lf|8QrpO-(ut}eoiIM4C zRB;M;jl!1=hum1KBG-jE8i@%fPrBJyW3_cNa2)wY$^V-sW`QooukmWWT*yH8eBQ*S z6n>Ob{&<#5F=R9r&BxO6*T08(RNNe^M%LG+8a8&03YtgC?0`fLPwxnf&@w?A8z}I= zaW{1n;N*E%(c|CGHCE(14!P=~k%tk2Xg!Ct9ER(5Llq4bQXTrOiEAwf8YBhNe3S_# za2p$16&I`$B#%&0^}z#$fc*~Ak3q}+9sw9Zh%QTRj5VT^jUic)LT z>n%g;1!2~X@!oS3Vc{ZXdbkN?j_7YZ+w(qB{hs-YH--P)6HY1r?VH zrv!}D+%>SNqX2PRa(D{>6ZEwOHsO;yHCg}l4%8IG41;V;m&&3`&e~~?`hAyCpIp*K zVGkr(*G4FOIH9p+?8)2ij7u&!KMA%Hh)HmPZcW+1OSVWQ?zliZ@iM~Q4f8K3+NR3T5kQdmUG*XhZr?M zCBww?8JK0Tr@94CH@^bPcH7$*orPJaPQ$zOSihWMYLivJ$l#KbL>TWAyQ2qU&XDQX z0&`K^t7<2hAvPSlU<&ifzj_Za5b95WU|cbu%TBBrX)Oh?Wmk_uWEK&-bfSnQLZ zCkLtoaKwgEi5X&R3K`acz1})^Md6EaM3EU%0XMh5-O1gEZ&^SaOQm?td*y8ECjcw4 zboStR_klr1j6Oxn+KnA2XVf=+^DN~`DGP`*kT^7C!|?qs?ak858+#~%qox>=wPrCD zi`h(X>SQCJLn0h)MMp~Zd3K8vwbxvJ&{)>u}785y;=Kt`sg4QHfy1gi#_f6nNo zihF^-WnCrYH<$>R1e0<6>0-Exc0O{3<$~rIyLT4PBh7r^gZu`7wH7e_3oSTDI6vIkrZ{!pfS|x&>n`Vp(iEfw{mI0&T zGjasz8zv|KlORu>02EC^erpf|Q(u+_f~#s|^ryO7o=YuNw9K)AJA2Fm>O5kUB{?lr z#I#;xG6V#%4Z#kJB(2gZRAFZMZ1r2KpdWSh`o_cljQDCl=^TEtp2aR>XP0=4ad^Zc zlN%E-HmZbO3U>89+C(<7%zOE54fsHh(C(^(l7_|%YdZs(br|HS%dbA_Oc_b#Lrs<8 zs$nfbM=-gg)^V_~v@W33k8B*a)n#(IDA+=qYE0EPro*|X!7@zUS~{hxs^je(qfV3h zpd;ke!;EY^?c_6#s1(RTg-^0|_npki5wn?fErP1E;wNB`-2T^T2rCwiEH7Rqrq3B* z;x!U$ZsQVwfQwS+aYpj1N>I>{%}GgP6cVlGjrNt;Bwbhx`H?sNqN-^Oe-{1HB?4l} z{eG;DHk>+S{q1jm`&(yVJ7kk#yc=@Ge@G=b+4}?jkFunC`&+Ai-Ot5N!|rqD^*Vs^ zn&O?z1nW$^q3;=VD)YE3zUrRxWwmrHJ|R7N5Tj>4vG;7@P0m5YR4%FjjEni?u{}Y1 z_c__Z*wPB?-=(V(*>y&c=c{E}xJ6h9!NgJi(i>N#fWJ*vD294vGg^2JyVTfk@% zca?1Y){aS!hZkdNjb1mdjF9Iz$LNo&)^(lTB)33>= zuxl>G#*?hg*|eir+Ot`Ahq)!*VrzQLxT1&C2Dua@E}(%iotRc1sU#%#cUyrC+-T^} z=Gd!hL#!Z%_u^qQa2=Tg;S!G3)G(AkeY3%d|-V>k1Dm7W~qM5XjQdtb$w}-PRr04J2%r2 zB949K60QNiy2HHOV#~DN123}CcWA+WqjffWUpmu^hl#< zezEYFH!P}S*Xs9w-jT934_H1NBom;P?`lo#{Z#5ZiIA8Gxu~!#XSPTvQqQ|A!m^2E zd4ESt%~tBr${d-zMOyQ)VQZv^Wr7zcA4x#|Z;O9p>=aagC1w2gZ`mt4iF=Rmh(}DM z!!jly`a`uO-ugqa0JOw1By`h8ly@T=D@QlVNM_4J6UCc??nPZkW4^UlI{oY-*4ci$ zu(R2!uHiQLDCESYG$QHb@#iGZFm}VR^3H)XnhCX4w*~N-AeTfod|zWitt5?ki#E7# zv5{NM(r5ozEUF{um63OOyw84@AVT>ZGxaXAJToAVQ&3!?D%v(DDcMS0)yT21f(hB{ zaNDVW9=b8Fos+)jOg%Na)m3jzP%DMU+*rzDsD_}n_6WbpeS!AkH-%jMjvbT=4^NHS z3BA$24wq53ELd4fih2&A4TlJtrMZs%6?U&J@Gz+}9CjHpPc6`XnI&BWO`v!E61Txkq(#~*^IU7MIae_IaIr>WQTB zI0l;#%;m;^T|@6vLe+VENY{+#yWm;p3MlV~Y&e%mA=5#6-{a_gh_%vvIhG!BPqcA= z)m9SMN>u!T&RIw%`6Fl^=!bq5WX~5LRnMO{`{D<~rr%Z_``0;SqVwVI90u>g%;Fo= z*%)5%>Q>mR=*zz6vo-|73RQ9wev+8%ANfRb{`E6AO$a%l1vt7)n}o>j-;$0|a^cDDucUR{k^vdc={uJ2eOmDWWg zmuTAI5#zCj!z2s58lZSJ%#&(!nf4Oy)M#Z2?-eBOODm~0ob{AfNKweoVP2|#92|IC zC_QF>!)SQ&q?y*DhmbK3^tfz7o)NLymfJ2(MeR`@-8hfunz!VR-DB;$tW1Y>U3%4a zdk4?#&}=lz8vD-mI$c2Tx{MM>R#%i9p*Py8cepJJJL~pmO|&8C8O2Jhhswu-Wo<@E zngsagBervW{Pz?UDW>OpAN!pb4|CaDw3g&`tk|W%AG|U>rjRMDTO^8V4+Xc`7d8-r z+0A3nRxHYp7=}JH5dPQlQ+Xu!?f16j z&AOb`W^!Z_3;DEAvTMjl8G@MD&13Od5~y&L5q4@!Aq}47V`fc$G|bXJlDdgztlMShH%yqO1X{>!c8szaG7(qcSCkL<$efcK&ztTTxu! zKXWvS-HxHM?f$8}VxNgn7C-M+r%Pmy!tW+KNVes`5gNv?S=!ueig*{RvFkchgvQNz znG9X5SG;lQMu9goaXeOD-*}w}$7d*I=IWGfCXA@nzJ)@CL>NQRvgAOZB09!VB`xo$ zY;A%~YtR8mi=|&Khh8Y_$IB!rX@M6OVt>!Zzs0$=3v&w8JQlYXq3DC(KZd$h%i=sK z9uf^ns+05sk5&81}eQKOwLAtu!UG>z*-_*XspCsz(Dmn3JEbkWof2+Ha z9Y>BM`YXhoYorlm2=WNB4z?i-AQ^2)*1ei6HfvC15w(n({v2OqUwrZ(^qDyTYh82@CMD+9CKL1=KT#Xh+>II{H&$}Z&Z78vxLD_ry>*iI zL+Dtgi^OtZ!|RXGSYeZ&0=r)jMu*&rj!Ysd_Lg82q$<1Ea@52k=Jyd5YO+Hggit|b zvWuAm70?>Ux2$v@+ElP5^xcbK6>Y?4&I=b+6OC;t^L0Rx!`a5vkr!f`!N`=VR7Oa~ zHQn8(k6n=Yq*`Q+nJyZ1<503CxAr*l6qlD;Rm;p^n1zLbiyMDhk%hNgtC+Qy=VmG# z@-xx6Kb07149{EYrN^M)66<~(d=>j-x^}{_%}Sy>A8As8ZF6h#cmSG92^}n4KR-jdYIj@`GNePV!g7gwJ4v-l>32s)mXVOe{> z7e%f3MiMKyJOu7jkyk4Uha#Kodq+|(y;V}d4?e4~+Mr>wK=V$ZT740-&RoA*Y)Mpj zlG&}TZ~kzfgk^X3PPa=Or;d7dX_u-BLxBC^_DNjErI11GIEhFj`n_XA=NMWBq#lqR z@+5Xzu!&)z`oay%sFkXbkRU-(c4*2?;oqrCAHK%#K`#8XE#vAYAekRIC$~@dX!3>) zLbWRvsEbG?-bP|NM1xv*Qs-S9~bIm{sfL@-$U)HGAkYZqBE)rpL~Dq#Edec`FRZ#KQt;Rt+MZD>S@WDe1YxIQ?s@kDVe1L59-Qi-f1eO`y{D z*;=q-Z>M`%2Qp&h6cMvYz%mXKLVYbNOFGSP{N?AUK6|q62P7oK&#HHVEe7%mpKo`a zGZb(##VgRmWW&pQ?L>f0xP}+r{kyQexC`zU;+{4_SCYXlRXy zzuN_fUUqe8r81YkV$C5}rR3s{v+9L?w?RoM)?^CX5Ym<>)0{971h#gCPW4E2lj!$R ze>7c#1!F^F_3Kgzku&NjjeELlT%T3HYjT=()%n8sa7NRnHHlC-9dQma9SU`eAn_^C zM{Lo(Nsy(I@6Qm0N90M_n?Ch9&&?67^GT&My+_6sSl9fJmyDI5fLAPbjw>zykf^uU zXPoB5S0cW@jRQub_rXOUYrDN!4lkvbk`2{`58f>f9{Ko^J>oJd0LJ z>`@y5-Q@!ah`9)I5Js1hA8W~tJFiiHL0W#+p02xI^$x?hDb41^N+q6~RI@3`(U$PH z(o!(>0z3~I4H&qJu0GBlQ9at!1r*qo8(4H0=K&2iY3cWrZyRl~=Wu5|22LpK!h)P*n)9k!Vsd@Js(msI}ODZbBxJr zL86-oq}vW*W0Np~gF81G5-9{Q8I=|^U#kUsraCVm$INqK0Et|ar@W7wXixc7PM%*Y z7t9fsX|myfLzjtc!Hu%tQeFd-5>*nF0r$zxmEr1KCsk3ZvATb_Os>YF>||UOEFT>j zja3{79E1c-sbZJzrj&rxmz=4RF&x)rmnIq(?kg+mRnNb;6k5}7m$TNiby@&P}q8$-c7Lsoy1Xh|8vU>xPvxOPrH)Z+N&{&j&s57;o!OCUB6+SY|)b zx#R~roUpdJCjaQPC}e2GB(I~if|>jf(#9EtzoZpAQ~8|2|3#WgUx7Xi>SeFG?<(Zk zb+6FTMzmu#9xZJ^(*XL!xaPXuk!g#i zUSgpv_fjEiT9?x;LOi)sd*GduFO_Y)F-A%x){}4`?v!>>Rn30VBVwdP8P;3h)UKyt zOFl!pMZxTvh=}q&meU_rXD^)sb0Tq?dWDh5`bu5X2j(c-Q=pO7T;~j(8ayOik?8lL z?kR@gI6u3V$ZzCZ%{A!eYo>{#orlRoNm#pNi;lBo991Sr)_y42WNxP*Kawoc3Q~Le zA$VD3-;ek1*ah}}57^5ql^jzZuz^F7Ue&V)b3p!Lrh(1|4h31unCltYT3g$TFXhUNM>#JUS#O@cq z%Of95v0-W=_ibRT2oh|2R zJx)yHAt+%9rR_)>j$F*-El;UYrE~eNM4|@5ivlxgDRjKXmw;z-2`%wy zPW{-03lx0jtBSnZ14Nn#eMjnxBnYJ&4}Fn8lU(&{yg!VbFE)jd z%{v;r5|#jYRo*=MkdrB;pS?Py7BdXaOO+CL{7E}vvOV1|x;0L!=&inHruRNO);@1% z>BS5(zR}Z?A%n^4tW7oegUru?W4w%JUo?Uo6)-xQj8ozLh<1Bm7F)#SZfYuKTTS>i zoT@KYa$gUA2&tGAH7Z2D&8#y7U&ps(}GnS-V*{WC7c=m`gNuS zAI^kft)SoyWOd=e&wPj3nDG3aY)=h*Ybqx|>hn-`ABI`+IlS*{V+56-ig!_OhUhrj5sw6+yd2 zDYNDmrH82Sc=yY1Ujb7cOYEN1dDR?SQ8y`FCGT6EGUA{gkb!`JAb|)JlGNikN6gwl zfPn76fq)PJR3|H2eL6b>dwUa0BRg7W3-bcSQOi|>h}JSPgd*>c^OR7F`GvIkupD z$jy2%*Sz8eA%A2rTLZ<%Ct9ItMpNdGsd4?w>lo)@9ZfFGZ%JF<+}eBBPD zp=Y`eXEqK`I_%X$q2Zz$UAjx&IGVK5w8zb0U#@CFb;(cFX>ze^(g$nyILHk}TKs*@ zu`G}UIa4jl*|55|gs;W;eJ+VbC-fNiWkqt)WDP=H2CYj!u&o?_%(Si8=V^L|LfrQ< z`1mz2zJ6TD1T-z7D(AY8D+bdrHQJvXWca***ij6;^NB^ZfmOwX8N#e&Nep*%erFd& z(T;mMcIB?T0dwve3ARX;I``5Xd)j4?{1%zI@`G@V-G>B$MoVg6)gurKm>I7hR(U z)jA1%B8iof9%c=|XB_~~G2R#cl%--69?&0g-f9`YS5z0bwJ(|VRtAbZG zhA*ln1PT|L0j+lX`DA!M@mrU}IuqLJE_qeF3Vf37MwWq5Q^*&9Ha~X&uk1}g6wzzN zYeEdLA6z)$|T+~S$&trlr8fc=-_`K(I73Tgx9b9$@dnKda2`a z4ErB82N&5IEF1=6zNT-mKeL7(`**juHo*7s3fd}WVdd}STHsrr6_ULU>h#ZQo|cYXmzo;9`8BkyQogdIEe-1@hjGKrP%iU#f2DV4-VZ3sCl7x_*`+ZMnmWJaGRxU@Jl?_<{~Y)Ptwn6{!$|ZmbqQh+svB!&H6}ms6Nsof(2iX$JD-dM7>IWF&;3& zCMDKq=wsFZJE_OCpi1?^3Q+7U;;iH8A9l~^;}MlNR6s_(7S`l*>OEXg0zKPrGq6jH zxz0&eUwp7~!H(f|QJ!JHG$cs5TjqP^YNXzv9!Hv-^j!JU-d-2r?2KwCq}^bD+Ov(Nm6{8s&lu)1a4L**r60b4F587N$U>Vx)4lu(u+vs+2UQT01en zTQS;@R9{KE*`Sw^!!@(;N50VzK)%sVlBT=Zh57#R#B#emtxxK1q9@04W?Ty?fiGsh zW^^VR8V?r3oFZ>5-3{xii_tkW^vvj(upa}#1^sfmr?id#NUjIxSo{xq#`l4#m8Op6 zK(h`*V^YQB9Gdk6he)$|17krp;o1e8iWb=MG3$Il1&QW+Ic{9Jr5X{dP93RbvMGjZIk_MV`UM=wb0A`En3U#hX$g5?&*^hM z1BsAZiwd=-Dii9?)nVumt%zTPb32mTC}0t}mSCj=!9AvJg?R2_w3&u|TcG;M)jG?r zDq2q^!D7pt{m147p|p3S%8!qF+_ctyITLNr0(!i7S1{bC!9G$yiI!u3Ub;w@^0cvx zsX2+_0ZCX$o#NEc5QljzLStR+uipo_y(q;oufUW(A(f~o2#?AtYEd(XjhJ(lUV$3c z6_+RGmGamF2$md_qwytP`#I=faE#q0NWUlA~)VFmMWDb-RY&htotd#a6f8 zoooHuPUBgEep&|DXB&W9^0!N(X9f6!A4~f`T#}6G?$BO*1n^BIs15nq&+$U3cXD@7 zjqvyb%mM>37@zJh7iW|Yb4YfH8Lz$AcP?Kb^jOq%gE~;2HHaurJ~~ePP_=n|E$Qrk zw3isc_r8rOTf0yx_y)@WPC}B_?YoZyeqvW40)lg$V97|};4`JXKh{m&nYxe9&qap{ zzCgcpKd}Updi3V&+n0l1k3zt8oP4m~4MvOEs7qLdS_*CiiSev_@Ub|k7Mp~@OKglj zv7_GV+tPhOg1;t{iU?=Bij}pYU$neU?twFfIlX4*+ZB1JSmqn>zvU2stuT=eki#J0 z{N=Fy;hH%a=*s_xccu}^1=mB5@Z~wZ$5z^$93k`yQSy*5zYAERmN?PeYPSI?a#Dbw zpX2&QSe}*cq7OQTI#BG~jt0yhSOlw3Y{Tm8oH&h>3iL?VPXwNVfuQ?aw(qLg1O-ii z9P`-b$Gs*#?Wev&$!&D91|96AU{Hjb(+o~y4~2~-{1b`bizXYm?`BSj$4U`PI>+PC zM#sx`Q>qYnnx&mww^;vf%_Uh|f;1!$(53(o5d2@Qv9otEH~8b3o~fz>84;4X1b+Q0APGXvH(=9I{22M7jMf%{HU&a4B5PzisZ5BP zRA+?N+B8My^?uAbfHnrEWACclahQRgtU5+&|M~Nyvy%fS2ZMi9aRj#T<;^Z)Slkb- z*Q={7frltKRPg$u?Vg6hjED<2wDrnr)+M2Buxom-txy}Z$Dc!s8fcf#U0e;xCj?p4 zA%ZW1mYs`O4%?Qv_O344Yj^B*)d=1*4n4TpRsyq@V>%^7Ny_O^jaOP-KQ$Uv5n+Nf z`0eV@Jnb?fw^Y%tSq!jgaJbL-L^71J%f`!je?o&r((Mv?P3{anP`oth&Y=zTf+3+2 z%ucYV=)##Yno`q~mB9s5Gn}d0`eN@8k#sS#ZqVp+2={a%e~{#Y5eEFw2$e~ttvO#{ zUS28EDT*V2Q!AS3>?V)!l7OL@i!s-g4!$QhPM|R1yU%HBC zC~#eQ)>781>H!%J+Zh)EMgyG3?fKAxUee})yUQj>b4{l)%rfMBYBv1A&Qh9-Z3YV) zYTE0jO9FS>cs%AiRD@7WSX|9^YR-n2R)Eypc(yw}t6Q?qI=fvY3G{sNGXq zSm5SVFgczjoN=PhH=JZgYCuftEqY=(vXmWIzZaijE>|PWnN2S0;IzVJ4OaRYI^v+p zv2%a*6Ii_@cX>b>NQ~fNx6Hdo5yo3!c~Zg2%TmN@r}2YF0cUfwJ& zR!FT6-9GM@!wD5}AjieY+^$0<$5mu>FYKldd21ZM2WbScZ#P(70a{1RrmMkOq@FJ1 zD`UCBT3p5F_n%lYSudTgJ2j5rfeG@hh>Ga;On=mYh3c&a&n&);^2%-p_JMYNxcq$7 z`=EGtm4;;M1W|eqe0t@;@1Kx`DT(4@^;rTf>O7W1bZk7yJkO$o8}55b&uj8V(%$}! zsk~cX`Up@U7)(=u!yHr@mW_u-1!KxBP9C+aq-@)~Gy(O&kxXs|JRb|()|IBnq{Uvj zZZnM+yeFv*K3uGTOXa@yYcdoJ{#S0+w^9_goJO6jFSlvVXO8UaL(w?4S=Pt}G7%E# z!wmt{>7S!Z69O+7?kpKUHV(?B4njAe<^)5xvlNS!Du<4|g@(A+E(Q{jNc3XYR@NBY zL&Z6toq^lBUtE=&5!N$9os`56Jx8HMDmT{8WIlzAjvAGkCVx|RKwF3Am6p=3@|jBO z0z*Sm)x@P+Dr;{OyZ56ZId}|K9$#?Bf?nM$Sfl56) zFFGST{O~%QZ4V~T___dHxJ}%5dNL@yiI8~Bdbih40Bv7^@I7wyv8kXE!*R`!M6%ZC zx-~Cg0i?JwR+fHBURG3J<6=d#UM2ZS7D5`A?686z+i-b_u(aaxlNr1*iG%dYnT{3> zUeFiey%^X+pht6NI8ek~GnX8^Nm7?b^x8 z+1pM8sWgAN3UpWEOD1lIOXnNPsKnYWhKNBg_o$VZhmBB}B(3q{I%4jzWob+P;wBwQ zHn!B&$cGiapuIx{;tsAQ2fONCn_Twn^k>uD6LpD?H-3BTXXW6aGONzd{%;(@Clduk zxnEBDG4Nsop9)gOSXqQ&FNONDWQO(VNe0@lnIlvY+_(GH6hJdAI6y5>C*G^OAC2in z)vRkbh%balG8PG~jr!U%OxooLRb)D)Z1GXSjf^B!qA8kz;Z>`&zv9kSX<-KkZ7i9O z2*%BW{mi}{@!jQrZRyc*P7WuFFzVlxaMMJdPjsO{sMgdRg1!=C6JH=~qfcSLN|Ig@ zj6oc6+%t9|h>7>=afeEo%CJC^itR_+xijjDSI{q0{8nOW(D)rln(CU&GhT14<~f!T zBStKVabJCxR=q0Rt<}!y^R5>@-a0=F%1wDW>K*p6UDui!7E2=!fk+5P0<#GBDS>v2 zMqd^1Pz1C!B|B}K5}aTMwAHV>YRQ;)m2Cg?1QwCcDL1P3dK|e(HtHSlgL>M{8uc*n zY9BZhvthQ001M29EX0;dcAF5$h?I!v7TIY(>IOOcKIsPRKO~J#8`oav=Hb3IpDnABF zR}E;Z_j%`zqtR7*REWv3o!Ob+UihJ108*0eGRD#8`a+rgE#W}lz%3j1mTV{ELT`Rd zG5C`UclnqchKk+XelrKIT16Gco(*@oF&<@Ngvuqu`G)0Zm%Gt9xXc)q0}tf4`ZhG^ z;GM|?+DybVCc4$h6044<%BXXp3%Af-1ucX2BAkW^BPs!Z*-2n z!@3)64nd{u;I1CDzqzzF@ousxKjUoQAMeV=^HxcZnb`L$ZdHI?Uhbby2G53O2nyS` zJ<#ElZ}8;%df1Ja&cCJfVNJ~E5Tjrd9Un?4gSk(i7z47&Qw!z09oioD>`1wx>AN_X<2_1{X5=niLf&k6V$oeVxARgsb_z>>=?H#U$P zO0t7-2egi-m{W4F4K*vhHLW@1t0lR+=?RuiDM7LP=9lljD|!+;7J|jrZL)NOX;#mN(X~F3i$_ z9!ncbDHT`Me}-qdeBMck-s^>@n1Y!NM5FBKUWX(qG>)-O5PDc$eAs~{(&Hz=hwdkI z*9GS-=b_fou_MK>-5R0B?`dw>^Fva}buHBib(V2A{PoX+^^FEVbI})>ap^9>bh*xfy zpnUHWt&{Drs5P-BxVs}>%DWUw75GW)C}rh*%86=lp14G%=|owEax;nYwUat$1=Tg; zCv$pw72F79QRR0_ic#VoVFPrZp|t~V)w7`HxdF@WT}9}({8GVKwZfBkvRj@6(R*9v zR7O*;t>zTVDkO}x*JpZ+k<;k@_k$Nl7@~^B#2cPdw8>+#e~$_n@?nn90B>gd2OuEq zzjR8=*1+73PTxw;;n$GwmsZjKqEyUDOZVcVga2&J^0hu1o{`E3!&vW6J}tckrGL7U zrk(;g=|42>EA?zlxUJpsdV1k!?Asp|KD$7iaOSzh7O4pEiOV~*Yz><|+P8}Z3+7Nw zV}0bt=q5?qHhqO{=j$A7Slm}3*0zV zOH!u;K{LTQ+_*hwS%yNg$KK`DBB|kogd4F&HRZeoS$J;>v7j}c1icDm%PCZ1m3PXx z%|qI=wdBVI1$Vu6Ia)jjn%ij!`5?Iu>BInqSMBzg2ie0hWFhg@f;mxlu{VT4$Syc7 z8S=&rv}@8C@|vTU@LUjm4!n2LHgq4sMZ%x?*o}f7JC4XF+kgAq~i?xBB#xLRi&VZ#RT}cJNKpya}Bm9L1 zT=RWu093$Zk+HS1wxiRrw*GHuOc#=fU_kCU!1?du*#Xw~Z?v9+oxPRCe`5g5f+Rx( zD2VmX;s0MX$oIMY7XvF>gZ~D1YT=;117J1*aG1ZafNQ>wARzYp|El$eI{n`4y$aMX zj(~E#05c)K!ozA||{`ZNPf8Y=i|7BX{clhtY?SJ4`QGde!73%&S|9jBoAAD-UpZNa_!Tb*YJy!7# zJU8)A_-~Pm-#PpqANYrZb<$t$|2tanJNWkw{vYsZ)}P>ib@#vHfA8AV{9m0+o)^Xw%uLZwr$(CZQHhOx4X7&Tf6Pq&vWvge1E<-XOdYNtYl{0*X=BM zDPRy300;;O047UsZGiuAApX5Jwlk7wyf&QY9_9b!P}end^UjYv{f zCY4l#l$TQ$lm|I5y|S?k$DP_~eY$l>Bs-o*Zp+EJznXggqqIB#SDh3?Cyq2i0x*qD z=%Nx|woH_r&`-D+xEvE2h|{0o;gR5!bU!-SV*{g}ya!}gtTQSjz#2|gv~&+kaY9r# zm#fXD%J?*=y2S83K$UNSBUb@r97tGHV_+^S=Gctl-OQ||OH%-3-HS7oW%TZkL z7|Y`F3VpZsrv3e##Hg~@WG099M^PPV_+`*5dlELM;@DQ77#2+DB${jEmzT*FDz3q1 z%Vuv6@R)Bg;u{9(%3N94-K-x?AAr0RI7HP(keLo30Kg^?z~B4-jSa&8WMg1&|1TPa z|DaJAPGNV!bBVW7MkRzJKnPC7cFd7MPF_p3p?dRbRZh;nw=gs1X?l66nso?&+4Hu0 zBFZJTzzI+-J%6@E>|0_(r-}8B?@S1quMh9*A5%Ms=HoOP2*L9XhTEV&pab!e2v@_6 zULdEiQr0{a#YE`DWwhC(ZfCtP0>OolSxoFV1K8$wGLQ?spTBp+|F+t|a7mx7yQGiu z4P0f|5CB8S{*%%I=~(`WD4cqNDRM4+SJEO>XWXxc==QZTFeC?4U?P~LAvk+m;_2?| zqeYje+Gc_$F+k2ZQ6WfJSe>+gWqXJjrvjF zO?B36S7=b4#6@lsCVzm5p2@B0p>|DyP@jI=6PIlumQ9fS8fj6;X_`I@1u7c5^=aK^j0Z##B`UN%L(W}E2$tZRP-z(4Kp zU*G>d|954B{`*$X(Zt$`p6;KqW??`Qm=OVN&nwR`!^^EzMcBBhCwwkT+{Zuu_YGK< zw0NoJ?v6ZEr@ZO_9@G2jDRJ>O&R4HzSu!p-XjNxGWT3(2VE&%VYjby)Oq;o$d0mO{ z!LY}zUOp&OhymcSIe*|>w_#%Av zclmSw6+F)08E$rt#`OPJN`IZEi;an`^FQ$auf!6kEdM%9k=J)9#!pSxk9?G=^<=@; zkuLxdJihQ}{>dww(A=1t`j1GmdxQT&DGwk3;UoV%Wn_WTM21f$A zkaR0J!-t6oHEzn6+u>^AQ7qv1&1XdM;rKi{BkLJL?z%_;?XJIq_&k0^F%4BFv-Nd< zfc_&fN@x)MeQt_Q>s&hsz1gN)-Z!b=uh7)wpZph7V>Fd;YOZ>*~@ZaZq!m$>!~` z3zxQzZZ$yYH5kc8j4CvZnpE^C(;12b6`VJy)Ki&is02&A&}=kwe{$u5=Z@@b!25#D zFxZZ2$7G_Ww#;AIBJ(!p{8}wfq!fuy}eeIQ1L>{k$$(* zLTAEi?BDzv!nsg%jkgY|ESS-Gn)Av>^R%o2q7BD)9gnJNKu0M%>dJFL5cXjuRSL+K z-SqXYYt;W^_@R|^rYQ9(h>6Elm-F3(R-_~*-67pgTFkvl=^CW~?BK~H`VF=mZKul< zRjS4Xem+JV5sxY33iifFmrTk+{99A>jVWW_z3-sL-FwCC>@Mf3Tufi1DU?^z`NV_o zW}k_!?_Uj0VV!VP`0Kjn|EmV0{)dONxrvPl{l6pQKTNh$Wa2g$5JGRiP*ZPpkQ)j3 zgHb^X@l-DYT3-hokmy^H*LSubZmqHb-YZ)xsZ=(#@1pZOcn&k-kB8tX=b#ru(WwRp zwjqd1%@gcXMBX-6-wt7jjRZ&uphk$i4Z--Td1(v`oX9X8_a|ux20L1g0}+IBuz%|) z{5pPF5R|H)S;CZH?&j2>9Cv5VM1s`b=hXd?^-d_wZnP1|BUNfenwR!>smRJs10x1q zIDQ)ma(9t%Bwyng%*Itd<9W_dyCUW@Ux5&h9e5u*yQ)XT>hTZ18|O=}PCbHx*gQ4- zS<;3j8N1i=Jd~`Pb$Q|jNbXepFavLLVTZD61yq>|z!^OE-af(pFo@F&+pjIc-+BAQ z<8yKr`}rP~^ZaAVyQ_U${CD0t03TeSPSmSBT{|b-&fATkUP3cM9{BwPiTW(>@>>j1 z%zec{iVduiQ7j2JDyOTzU2T>^$W?_grTkb83wVIS1nsm@ymq#BB*r{Wv%w0>qc<}R z2D4%76=W}85f8Ke7K8&wtR(=4iZA5FmqnrF-%b9Qze+$2OE#dkGjEE-tD}16FH67ujttv6B+RX^PX^4%tN4+h(?71z#5Jp_ zPrO&?vlrz5*!~?rSdhb!41Te0%UZ|&-8C){N&I;{(d$IGLrG>Y7`Nth0kJJ$54i|*-4 zqa`~qKN>Xqk9k8IJ*R)-%_ zAxEYHQ&~nbAUP61Tx2PUq9;*>OgQ zbDspdl3_+P{uXmim^k@k?cKHgb@*WIj2mS-3|uYc$l4K0-MWy_I(Y~`WmkDf0mFg7 z6HfA350{pH!cG!rzoDPbs%~AV!r1n}Tu!@6Xpck`i-r?2g;7M6>F)E$S-Prbtbnpt zU8h_<`t_>b!C&R?D8k)}1!$N3PAjt(VeqRWWrIVQPQf(C;EovweYln(E&Wu|uS0`2 zT|pbo=FU*}=vUr73|gQIImze2b2I_g21M1VnAGGRbZmbbW@@I$h6B)%~j z-Y+{J@Y|Me!6E_=f^W6HBOrO!`(GJ3a8z~jE(m2h&WM{5Sq2GDkRxg(FM3-FrW3mf z@;^>LdBl2qjX}*`D&P{vupX|K97xCj?kIz0ofQhWP}SU}t`&ye%xBXC+JytdC3igpbZ$x32eF=c6$K$s zd0==)GL(~5>PakjzX3&n-vF2GeoiL4?r|f}lt93%#QmFL1XD2jMos#bu}ZEA+3c+| zYlAQ!p=Ua1x7v?exnHINivvoWYMhDWW!97}@}O!Q54u{MWt$y=B}xYSG$TSpYs+0NH|RuQlPd zYCVa}jq(U9z-iTZ5SiJ%$MVvc=TTc)0A4&*h4Qcil##V7D=a$b)@tWxuno~)e0{u2 zpvnR%IfgYdA)L0613m-aVO|dO@#B{{%SgTHgHo%^1#scGa&k`?_1Tsr5PsEil(BVs z*|_$UK4yXfuIRZr9+w48(#GQwc&}Lx8QG$^RUe2<`_yTh!1oUY7;(8G_XA6=^P0Ck z=ehcuHP}yHpzL@;-~$@c84Ft@c#6835vmKnFZw#i(a2?$P>es>gPMp`;w*BnI-vU==@mV6DHt-H12p~T zPB#NoSVYEF;%1KC zZu*XEWocWED0bqkHhfnx*$_7RSjD#Xe!N5-lezkgxp$sH#F^msObb$a_*Cz^S6P*I zn&-sheQPacRC|=z-Wlg^R!U<*^K0vn8=#ro!L{E%F$iRxVpt3e0HBTLzr`S=|HL3u zJ6mUE14HY7n;IiYo0dR~f0LX~6vEd`6?4j{Dip~&O=uk-e@3oLFh})Y^Gj`Z+Ni>` z&8lZQi5c&wSwf;oaz*P{Jd|e8yk}RYzPa>^dio^mOV-0$xAV4Lo{9pV9Cc`m_Nvv zYO9h5O-a;2tXIO^mJk&{mdaAz-DO6MZTd)0(wHQyBjdc;fSVlSVBGsFX0V-m8dTn| z5Wn*28Bw^Yv^vCl2JU>vMarN=&!-7T-3)UIR0LSVURm5hp<}d?)(Wx-Q?Q%tKZqu# zop?yorYdSFG7E`1k&aYo=iGt}Nj+8Er1OWEHQ+hRnvl}k!B4lUs0UYEpzdlNb|S;$zQ^TeR&(4GL;S_9+!IdQwxD3G zOC3-zd6JpNMlH{E>}9sZ&7@YDH7hx2Abt`?k&m*HdQ=d~T6HlI72M2S(9v4=^}fKZ zQaP#l7FM8sx^6|S!)o9*&fYRJ>6y#6r?GQePSG45kN(neOeR^x!8~LMMS}=2BF($>`1{8a) zr6Xx($Oq;d%RaWd;O1O{?p)$mO8pgD`$X?tvb&J-ol^V6CAsjPGXGu&O%>iwAlVw0 zI9p(BO~HXFxe}77R$wek(UI_a4NkHNn8v45%RRm;->z&K0@ZEu8L;z@nC7>a0!A*B**;_fH8UOeMuT35=bHUl0OPc*ruN$fzh z(sV8yQM;eqP;e?jt`i4wGS%r1wgo+k z)2NKip}w%HK1mIF^!D=~fGOKJ`LM(sF+?OMOULYrpI4Xef`rOpq6?OL7SNr3g_%#_ z_S%c+(6AYvM?W*$fuA#&5}3)8r}FQ~3#K{GCCrs!XBNf-g)2}e79)tp3;9;ImGfY^ zwE9H7m%Nuba9kFjYJy|EL*3=d=2R}!7Pc=Hac~nP&gk)uv3W29ErVid)c-Zz3l(eymxsH3t~;p7m5p=YtalMUOpCbJ`)PBie~BafB)BjjqPk3oc}^& z{OeHvcWD2wi2t7rkEI@|IFi#8()K((0|I#fNOv*`m#V51YlVDq$r3?D!w5wexm%jw zeRuWA9T`)2wbC_fL4aT_wd*kQun;{Ij4Hs>p-t)Y0Kg3Lo0YqB?@}kZPPbopH;9$R zTvI|po(x0yCogZkpX{$&PCrAhxprNa_@foLAGf{tH-~OJ<$}8~m#w?ruQ7Q)SKx8q zU)amct6!Zrp}c<|p&NJ}dfooO|Lm*Dtq3()3-PHr2K##c`uob{Do=V^W^HA$$YwKo zh*^6!F4N%CxV_glOaI4XsF%_AH73hrhsWd7=5yiD0NvB$))S-cnZ_?RtL>Q@f8DO< ztHy2T-OVnppvsJ6_q=pl#<%$k|MTms^>Oy=!o~MlZK!=GMhLl7!gjcIad&&g1|R_=#7i72hU31q;Dg4Lfn%K-$AX7EPJuHmF{S~tQ9Axcz5cUBkc=>JC$Rw z+b#!t#jNdxj%)L@huG&nI}I1##!E}BomO0*x@-G2mj;@e&FT!jd&PP2&R5%M&hkLa z&$7kX6xx2*?zboSn<{sItH(o;3}5uK3i+nOO!45cisLZbPMVGfOSRr!AJ=!EoY?ni z)4K?Ir5?}v>bBeN8>6kx>*%Jt*)aHy>`x1QwAk&}1?1~{l7$-ELsJ){w82&w+s@B@ zz4UVL_LOaPDz9=Iz1t9dn!HR4P2*--f#%dtYfJV$bKA7C%#^x|LFFC5F`v8JS}V`% zW8|%MnueQOi*Dt1{Z*LjlG{of{i(obTUTf15wbyY4(7>bT3l7!psmHT^2@`p zX}3a+p3isRvJZV3(|N+hHl4Gna3$m|tD$}>+{u+hNLB9h##GmR)!+81*603{tApK6 zn$jlRG=&(9%BIWp^7T~1&0vq%2m0;hMRL=c%h0b)3+=bE5r`{Y?s0m%b^vDuWtTS0 zQP#zA@cVx47WVZa&QJ_>Tzs2 zE)4Hmsh0*_j}Lj3z*HzY=#N=d*zHm1xLW63w$_j4%Bg8WN#m&Pm=biH^_28-{oS!E z^bhB<53n8;;(c)+VN^HXscUha&fQQAH^KMdGr>CWjpKHWeJQdp^;6u+{!3e1A0r!G zoy;0;2B~GIW+46h>fyyuKDf4uOt(@y)z=NAm7??o(jVPFuyVsuVxFi{tmn?SS-z z$g)V>mQ?;+KEy z!FYzpI@y)ttGSw58VuDAN_Jt|0D9o~SUJf?a>kZF*ru8{X4tzrWPZR>8Z!ew$@CFj z8~yF@4APF^uJyAibP)%+H66km3UPU@capR{TZX}sYXsyRHDaGDt8lh2`MA7fx)^`%lThnc@J3y@O_Ep zX#CVtjsMiPt9r;|Z=7$Y>G0TY^y{ICk$e-qozPh4k=PxC7(?pDJ%@fSr}gmm4oX@K zQ?cg7Vf5wAz@pC&gbll>8GYHeG4ymHksC@Bc^eg`{8p``dEo;r`*|XneQrTN;n}$` zkC=m*VYXpzN*sOOyMl08^6Tm zrG^)IgkhJVlY@kNf6M5TrZ0Vef#$eUxty{tDJ$Tka~O=F0hPtEY-@c6R@!$nfI?X=lHz74Y}Fl3}#;Qd^RcU)z2hfs!>Wz2M3#}h{wrCr!K zO+>dCB)wKRH#N<=Io-t_2OShp;v;-Hl>^jmnO+}hmiY$~TS8IX5W8gP#3BoI^wGjA z0zqrX;HwG$B{YBOQ5#tPKw&s@&}Pm#ZVE2qTzNtTXt{E89_}}C%5C%;pY0X^0O*US zG_Qh?5~SKuu@-MY=Kf>kgy~$oA$4E7%^_IcADBzCC~F;_3Ukn-m4P73@*pwMCfZNb zu9Q@P)XP-LODOO`WG&*(ZDLZNJA{xpFBk_>hMggkE!^o}9tn5as=Ro|ztQ#kMkGT; zh(w2jmYXs!W90OZod1AiYsRSj>A67muqzR0;nCEgFEdcZH#~fCg5qjt#G3%xUD-Aj z-a=k&{)506a+_n|Aj>||hvY<WQJH_ZIk-ahJH<6Rv&}5ez3_p>C zU?fP5j(=$-Vpw&ted~RxWv4=Hpi84QmFaNU9?ere7t%NAW#6b89o0t zo^Y!*`Zr_zy#owtwRBxRD`d|$d5{d@XX77;;Wn!=WX)(^#Ljbr$5XP_jnx|&kLD;YAVhm(gZCMXLD7WfD2~s`qTACzTi8KEQZc4T` z@bc!p8es#%{)z)!)542(l@w)v7f7kJ>()uRn=DQ zOJ6^pw}*AVD8|=HRPh4%Eww0V0PD*H$*fW5XiaL%{9T)WeD_Jv zP>xzvw*V-f)?kb?T+X}IrR#2O+M8em>w&tS5ux*zr32+sCo`Y=QGaKr7DzkXpIrSq zhikK72ahWkML=OZxZ8(})4kBMVkiBJ`CMST!}Fya5W0&BIj*o1{2x~i;GrW4hIBhD z#x}$xlrX|BB)lO-2_bYcpy;I2-IkE0EdW)50bb5?O}q(sxhYI&s}XyP^A>s3lfkMC z2lnURGg=S#zb!RMZw9#*UT|>aPwOcE_^NY)iM5|28pxZM8ssm%7|O$Z3B-4-&`;J~ zptHmZny)Rtd{&1Jspi^CK?n_W*9!Fl{pQ1Ry`S#4lnb}Lcaa+k-TaxNq?ci@9g&7g zk~(2t%_;yNjUeGWt7?#LY8;_aMSNZU>Ba-hKir0K##eL8m)jJ9#_)rBo{Ghc`&;BTRui*6?RXUCQ&9hYYD$k8BH|1#GR2hCYXh z7yG#1tmdiul4F=cJ`NV`mA@TQrY0WXkDzdLI_Gx@L4HV;n{B8ik2+1wOU^PS)}5vS z;t5c}lq4jYhrO6MRa4U8hzj2RDY)K^p^O8jcvMc|;cyP(ls@YR(C-_RX5(CjtlHrXIL^>fGZ;oATdWeOZ0^?)@xQE5%Kd4#9h=Z zGTt)TJQ^X3p#+SlE87bR%ILT3G8hg+4vcoi0?|Pf9bdRES-eNds1eG|CY(Y=8^8+SQy}5jF5fwqpoCs} z-U4VBQNFz$Uxt&v7-{xfllT$b0>$*lXH`(4RT|nMAoSHCuy;V+I;QVKh^MCK(0mkW zt2SS1uVaF+BEU+93`GN6R*7_Ojccrurx3`>p^XNXCpa?aDE%i4VRWE%wei6Q`zOzq z-6LFfi*ilU1Dp_^D#ojZ+ABqS2Y_LM6ncR55jd7qg-xZ0t?IJEg*AcwTuM;#(vM*Z%3Qpwz$lia6 z*ekJ~ynrE5pQbe8Ha55I+hDf7^NX|$+{3!V)Hq|OjVQJkwz(~pkH!3;u!nj-uu4c( za+TUvNr#s&yxs@oGtCXtH5pA3b0jlYioL)MCz+r|xoy=j!G&}KdEYafna|{@4RgS3 z!ogT*w^TXWn6M7N^diK%Z!$tFOTiVtEoEht6rq1Iw}wBqA8>-a3S_!oK-Zr3Cq4%r zyzt)r7sFiwZPnAs#fUh;ZcR0Z@Qgp2Ms&pJ2F>9L4`(@DSGlgTK}O1M$F{{VNgToy z7y}VSoqNOtg`kt8&})0l+3TPzUS_8i3oSA+a8jzlL?f(%ArU13tI^*40iq_ZWa<-x zrn$psqY$SN{tL*KN5=|5fgB0a#{Mwd5k<93AABZQjC5^@_67JM~0$H<3*|chI z3Vxh~N}!8WJi3(DfipKGuf%$RQRKRsZw=FKQdSqABmEH-wv$8Vc5T1@7EG(|UfmIx z|9C%ZfPHqhG!6nsD~vkesx#oFfQ8l)4NIC_q~rtX@X>O$Z*$?e26YQjavN0w zO=0n{UX@v6d+V4B1e_*+NU3k$8~9|+HCh#3H3`esQ)&R{QdH$N)>EDvdcJ^yO~2l) zDXlNf{=lf=T0_a|aY_9tE+v?MG?ouh*9yMYhIp=XaQc-w3K17VOJjzH^?cSiu#}`> zFB{FjDvV~N@s0TvK{se%6fR#TGGaE6M6vM|lSQHYqp@#vSC#4?cUs!}S|Mm4y&NCMb&ls(iUZdZ3Co9X;f#s_B7tCb<Bmxl7w6^})t61|A*Z^Hbw(vM^??thc9q9Z!y}QqNZnmikSPetPyE!d zU#jl5!uhC?(}{T-$^NF?p~%d-LJRjjXiJxOVqnXD1pp`8igkapT+h66N+ht+k95!7 zujSalVZd2SsMDlzH|}LVuT7h3TuNp9Cv)``Ye!o5;+!aDAn?#$=U3 z<$&{kg{hU}Et7{~`FG)5YN%&(V9j{O)5(auk|NZ$NH~0ZK==wLeA2R%ZRyyu8L*JP z7%Pnnebh#Eyd;4&v#LwN<$`Kj7gL;ADpGF?R?C9zLt>xZHgIERFip#rq3Yg5!7A7I zSQ<{7LF!o}w#UF#EM;r=I%Wq8&n&vgg4E668i7JW5O8e%+D8Ff{#P(>cRVXN2vB114MJ2`)ZQJNB@qP>`_v4;YceZK2;}=gvfcJMc}X zfmf^h!F3I-FPiakcN`&n-#W#tLo$Ooy^Z^#1bcj|*y&kA%hPh3WdQ$Kxmv-W=XgW~C|9U^p-y zxN7*oByj}z5v8#vi~1dVEE{sd_fi1cBh^~)(BoDmWHcty_LdP{o%;`zU4}of2#~-L z=}KdG+9E#B+9UEs)8mqjjm)ApaTI|~&Kr}+8W*k66$GdVbYQOXb;zEJPinkLxeoP$^jz6T+3(hz{kOl zqFV>r^ulMk+K8<6b*eF!iQMHf>NZaWFdcJodd0FukU2YMao5sDUnw8%()|&8TSRXx zg~V#Ei^CgRh*J^!7^$>acW}kBtM6?%Gr{{l5Y3?i#lF!T*=3Az==v%~YU!*#8@C`s zh%bF3d!RR|LEEo22JG1T$)SH7o)1f^#cOyRa1Ocb}!o zVoWHCG%$*HbFr{6PGITvH^~oRH0`s6MC+Xx2)qo{zjuxuXa|(0t1VA@_KS8tI>bfi zO}wNY$%G})xH&FH<-yfz_O&o$7)XB6vB`Igi>VTELt**m(f~%JZ6ilTYGUT9V$Eb$ zTB(;og;BQeb?`L}H!>8+dMPNx%}0hVvtWg56tr)N`e|xyL+dIiEtV?itxzTjGqqa8 z&c$5A6?r>3U3lV)+n=gg7B4%ka9rewKZrjJ=f09A7)_Q^+SKd7SF#u4kakEIM%P*i z&-;kiNc10)n1%}FX4iya^ngZ^-H>pf@+GH7IVt8c8F{HAYwomwy!EeH*^DdPmKlTO z8;iEc2bXwzDK1SAu-jComY9S#?f~3+Ytng(A@BE*r+?{wO)s>iUc2A5;nqfySb7@K91D>-Dn7&FjQxcASHD~r}-u2 zs*&ol$Xc*B*cyK=8!c~Jp|KVJCz{Y=QwzppeL44)xK4wPz;S}J?SxBnuCd)|caWC( z$Zae})@&M#9xducTyJi3ZWb@p64LsiSuG~}UJE-hBjTweNI)fq_4jY9cLhJ1O!5;1 z(n5JOw)zE3otdYZhidY~U9iH;o}z2@n=qAZAOgC5-Z~8m$V{}%8}F1&7}636D5uX| z)58ivvG`!q9tO4`#@K6`Wm9Xe*?zc4s1l3uWwK<}d<@XviQ6liX-B`#t!@kYSw;@h zQjYqW_)#cZR|P%4m@{cx(ZO}+$RzuGK-!HF>ay>e-BFCookXMROT{=5l8iUHSc@2Mu;>19cYhP>rfNfd~t^LSWgu2TZa=P7E^4W$S-35PzY z>tM@FIp*Q2Si7)wW6-Q@!G)%6=S!9-V$%T`B~&k8HP;~0WS+c4wX_UUAjX%(OvK`2 zRxrxKwTAW&_&+92d+E?yB}U#^^thIxVhE;n$k8i*`pg$^_!b!reAWu#>xxB>uOjlh zu_LaSFs*cDtpFBb^w)GF%>#_F@-9FsH(nyFsJT2wF+l{27bY2Z&$U-CDluQ59hNBMOrxW^oo|ertZo0ocVgcH zZ%yhH{Y6Rg)Kg=m|b?T4FH*;XJ`noEF_HF&4PX z+Hf%Z6k#6nFo+|E^OEBh15q=R5^@}Mi5X8VFLom$PVnQA{~n<_vZNEs?#DlFm_!P1 z((nKw5%RUIuck)xsm87M*@iSEziZ>1<8tp08uXtYwi{u}vJa2)@5cq}%T?>vYTtgA z2=YUKkG^B7TR465))fR!1l!4Dv*@z~;+YCvj%h#~{YPDeT zFIMC&W_yl@UB395ZQQZEklnKqOk$0?99SFamxaq3j3v(1lmrn;%rb_hwE%H9!&xpi z>Eol8dPHO%7nqDKP;WsJX8<5vAb9WQ#R+pj0UCnj7f0515wv9j_Q5;=A{54&GOeO? zHA*2sL=j0iIq*>`u%d~@H1Cwv|IAS)`?bl2V3oA&Dh?RHr+fMp-TJzlQc zg)PO3dX=WpO|kt71AUO9F7LF*WSSw`s;(ssogC~%vo+wg!F-Pae~C~=B7w4qmyxrr zITkLe{H(c)0k#NeL8g^^h4V`I_vkdI!h%ef;92 zx>5K8PJv2TVV+7^+8QG7hL35I#aSryDegy)Qb`Lr1qI5de!R@(jSm>JyfiN~w>uNY z9QVD*6OE$Xx?QjowWQ&Orn8=Q73mw!UDT)p9%P(%g*Wjn2RSP7B2+otwmoYG; zA0r|0h|lU$;NYDmyj5m7`NUM%6liWggQ+EMjzLkdWsUkB+EnLVfaTVqYsTye%5Yt% zZP~OlEf6q6_c;(A#&Eo}8tuKneyq>uOoeo2z-ugF&UX#EI6uY9DEV?Xa+3Ic^Wr4; z*4>;5IN@<_Aw$T163>w^+n2HqMHAmjZ1XyU)a5raU#~yxaIZ8Z&T4V5QU;&N+awgw zfiZgz)QrW;&La@9=tycGGI<~qYizO};imemiDF4CCfimRS(d?!dk;=pk$lyw@}Ve$ z)nj{AO;l)GrcX?H3b?(t6~llf&L`8OxSXf@jnqE0ITE7;_A^GNT-Rc5Kk8eB(b9U5 za+#d`ra;=OpT37bZM|Wxler?2(!!D)J_o9HHRg1bSK$zbo`}<+fVO}&&y_jXdAGHt z>{CMo6b;&bpRgQ}bQ7Inx)D$2=2667V4zlkl;}XJw11mVJ50I+*Tn#rx^CQqhqb(D zSilzJOPnMD=R7|S0DKWV*>>Xf~I7mlmQ^7trdswPh^M(TI|Z!N>j zECZ-ll-q;Q22EWrAKEN`nS>(nbH^Z$wAxbribQ%uH`P*dq{%$#2l$Q~3>6?rNU$UW zlXJ!kk_$5UBrYdz>uiZR-<8c>vK&;ej2nC15jh?))6^b>h~FKcGZDSf7SRxJNzuC| zr$Vf0{*3k)Z7em0Grz_;ZR-LsQQeky5SW^(@pX%IqSOLDgM6aTk{6ax-QCn{q4AfN zeShl0N}ih;G(M70q*-M1PQ*F{!_pMBLuNPYl1Ut5bIq2ZBMa(~PB+&Y5K$i}wp7R7 z{js_1?=onk|Oqo$)~jF`}HjuMMJrvRruaIwjy(gRq+t>dnv{%vsRTK69bIp zt{tYsgV8l!ENn)E@Rqy)LvAmN5IK((6~iZIejV)cpWm_d)w$j3d?H%`zrbv)^bYY=uLc>=Rg}x=v-N4A8r>l$quo&Bi zBDF4BAU#M@L{J_riWgHq7Vc2a5;ow0!mvlD;?kRy&MF>@Ui11SZ6m;{nD&#>a|{TyxJ=W6hjy8K6Pxh-kkuWaM}ecm0P|K9qb)t~Rt*yY8*wo#z?fz? zkG+O@=txEHNfHPFv}z?0p=s)^{AB6O91piMyUd;o?;*a}h$it)1}~+~MR8+=*CLqi zP;0#ilxV;psaiRzzofdAHd9^n1SafKJfi-)KZDyqpJ96`;wc1q(~^C_xsodpO;v!R z1Z+%lo|B#cJj;9EGtZ45Hf&J{26EzShjEhK>xvO>xLyt1W}!nO;P5y$OL&&>n zIE$#cr~@rCbKuRf2W)KClWFl1_&p~JJ>8ZR8@iQN3bln2_arV8(ZLb7zeDFrGv;sm z=%)jVG*kJZ(?Q>`o4GoM3F$O+3%2$8*fM&{Hu+1M|23t}w>CSW`j4C=lbGRf_rUEO?6NlkT&coEAKVQPCn+;y&QOdnWvO0pqylfrBl-3&%Bob zD0BD%0h`N45VzO5Df~hStt^gFLMH_hs|jF|Ft<(8m>IfnZJ)p8&Lv~VPN27$ z@-biX(P@!hlQeJZa$M^7as}i=E>thtdeFFnoLc72|j-rcVv!I+@Xw)M=x2Y}58WxaywJ z^El$5@u+k5aQQ$}2p~2M>q2yDh@s2-=! z?W*}#JcrhEydjLp;xOxxutkVb-Ur?<(cvI$Y_9J@$t3F zd6@h_^oBOfIccs;OCrlwdUnZ|2lN07*^y)rN;(EvV`nBNWvZx3ATekDFK6mO(Sd?w zrvmRnC4{;_R`Zagrflu1EXjr|i8PFdie+fhL3i7_m8!ee zbB(g%k@hMrI|J$8{xP1^m&`ZLg1qM&J+b`sl&9QnWi9D~qbXptGbuDyj4BYo5FqWH znmY%Vqr`3MHTtEzgOhdwme7hghF9XDiMR6B4W5Jy>lWu6T>qQ7LcV0y+*#EY2mZLm z-UPsixxbn^3dyc#*)wvU9zt6gEP{C`oj1vz`O`UweYF+`@QB|akwD3%Xl)&dI!R)f z^pl25&$*Vk_$doHEHgXLLx@IgEFE`8(#Cp?!;Iw!8FGg6v}rMq7nr5;@PNKkt{P-M zb7pfao2IQ+2Crn5&QOsGF&(}#LqB<{8hyPwoJKn-HhOxf)Yfy(us?@j9_ZW4Isksy zJgNgHuBwmQ*3ADoyAUq$xmfsHeBo1VpTWcRleF@3CEhT}Cx1@3kbYNfR8IK^>Q*TXm-U)cgPiif#KMD9O*g8X znnAPVwjQFkyG1;Y7v6TfbquSqQIxat@a3!qro4j$0_sZ4QEv&ba@h1 z8IsdHjwO6BS&)e0EB22sB^DMV*N;dK5Ny0O%$g$^Qyov2Q-Cpp5iH{L zeI8|LZOtsr%Y+hSvWRZ?g%^ux zj+4uB1NODXSMiba+3_AvH4A%IT1Q48zy(q0T8_3nZdY?wvVuD zOETS$x?I!9lrn6j!IZnu>~-+zmGf*u3t939zhhIh6H_{kjhUikVW~)_4LN=y#$_|1 zPQ^Ggsk79km1XngDpKg-Us!$4eb*+ZsqJ%en?)o;9;}qDo=>!&gMyC16b9x|L+)dG z16A4BSdb@%x%f@KYF8$k1hP@bcKV}MK8oaFr%dr6uBQ=ubJii!z%|`Zd-=jETo+>L zeiQ@hOT$lrz14v>YnWZ|+S>Y)_;13Jn1QBdu)g(#X%0G3QU!)go$m?*_uS5^Nzmtj zLV?1c5O`9TPG-F7Z$%M%_%`d#g`sYh1|+*rcM2Y%%8=@}Y&4O5lcciA2ZLJG^l%8t zVOM1)M37|sx5JCz3K-9KqxS53!w`B!zS!`y20*aKEsCau&LpT0L~-&p1QpV?4bXm? zdOr&G=W*kbLTGlLne?Zhk`Bsosq(DpY&uACb4HV6kWo>=g#1;KsAT{7$6^n;Wful1 zj$v-8xOcgI@HF-hO_mG(p{=;$ zERskko)!$Kj4C*M2Au+Hc~ji#4pbLZy_pFSCpNB92ZDCJF1t9ALIpB&ox+GlM_rj$ z6uG2CR21X}P-aAM80|-yRs=IJ#;PiaM)m`vO`YC?*EKbW?{H>^ePbLTD-z$LWVQvd z08)_BD$<~k$IXjfKg`Nm33D1J6-*5>mh0^Kc;Bcq_#*c**)i|1ze`$)JILGxyWyw< zAJ5Jug+pqsEM}P=sH7(n|H}5a%?RKdtqzB$)LcixbQ7m6ki|av8I`iYacE8*1vONz z?g50+%IRL~khcKFGH}R;v%SvLiKzTx(8VgrA+5CEz#H%2uCEP?*#qmET^*;2Vc2@% z3<60cz8zCl1!#-GN6`O(NRou_@@sGY?8A@WVvxOO9!nN%HjW}ROF)?`LrT6~{h8LZ z*u;?nRL7^S(=5y>QX#QC*S=at6Hc$ON7g9XeuOn!J3n=<$MuT9rZ$c(D&$*t)MIF8 zmeit|NmnW-_OzX@aGBJp-xL> zkKk!MYTB`Z9MOhO7m4oD0sPWG(h|r(nyBQB5j~1waE3)ksj^bNjjAN7d0KbK8}Xzd zOleKDnJjSG^l7yTtq3`F5SkvN-M@13SX3@q#e5-}mfFBStJ_73=vvT@Lypz0 z5QTRwmSd(utX8S6mc|iDFH-ekvJcTuWRr>3HYF|Avo1SNP$wQ@YlVaAP^sP*yF;vm zLRp=KjJ2|Y!YWFZ5Jq6VO%|%AQ7Dw# zoWR)G%DI=zT#PERq^=m*XRm3QOb5!OSN+gBdk9U?>%{sgG7W1tur49l{_U^%*u)>| z87F-m%_Pdglxy?RQYvf7b);D}Ne}G8DaS!E%okRe3xRT2$%%rzPA%hu+`E9Gs+qwz zYJnGF?$T|R^lsGfmbc z8=>`tB%2zkNRe11i~msW3Td~~=t&V5RLF=5=JwDgJFT5%K=#y#n!usDcj%p3kf!pb z+m|yYTGo~iJN{CDN-p^a3I;*HhrF%gMg$!oQhc2eg*@aXCRFZe+`Y8&+!w|*n$~7( zM()noDy)75D*TPLv_)yMTyaKTH{ILdQ_;mCn_hM`qFRIMDAb$@?s%e_5;?9=o~A5@ z2)7W(b>OET93rD$zmJHExYH_o%?zq1t`?VNT^(8PvDbv`+7Dquw#fBj&@uj-r9Pmw zW!QL^5i?elsdJF?#ge(JwB6` zSX1lw*X-nis(mPHTCDk>J_2csNX0(^j>Q1T)W2O*SlvnYB(nTKVAULH`xU zVgMFNVmy<9s;v)fCb3wjtY<$p5%V`QP=gw(qTiY@Y~d=~_~#=Qo}9%OnSfga3>H;q z9h}ZfGcjhny?R{;lqB-xz_K!8HSudY0riYZ7Auqi$_ati&VyD94V9uso);eC+=#-J z;@zt-F;m&M6kevwf|JiWF4hrhsxK;Nrm0_r9lNr4&?f0lI#jr^fe0QGzVcaV?pEtG z_(OIK?mR)jj}u0tXzF^V{l@}jP{qp5_)H<>mXmQ=m0jwLqWB3e_h)UN!f#F>v4PCnWO zF)pC7Cg{k|qwaO|vf?+8Gvup~|qAC>hkt8y5fRJxP3HYZjZ z7S{Sk%aN{_!BBK$xZ;!~$JwcFkqgo+rXaup2li&x4zh5@*`nSWplaecnM8dt1;q|v z6CwF;#So&5W;QFD9gAu5kB+ock7}IDI!;V!Wob1i3Eaqord(8mN3?HEC#R!&fC8o^2$?;JDR~~Rn>uXdqr+#`RV=dl>L02fm>%Bu>#Mr@ z>JO%`A#eN;F*t@di7lxdMZ+hc7x(CgZHI0Atfs`e^YZKxY$U=|viH0+G%$vp8V6#v zB)+H&RBL`scYXr@>KC;EK_F9>qn!IUF;5S4Vv;sa`kz)6 z!h~UCLdS!u`bpbI))FJj;*eeB@Ece1&H-tMlSw}UR58wx$K@z;MI5(_>Nkf1lXW&| z%zL3+hj+}(n8DytW&-lFoIfCU@`+Bi5T{Zv`MNMTF!DnHCLm3y{ za9+-|ifI4KMPhEPO02S}S{idec6LUbWnJr8!Neu54On6wwC-DH4KO7GP;10ot-M!A zf`@T-Q}BW2ZrDz_p!s;{NbziY%0Saee>m*h^`m#cqnvo#F)K(mQ*n_MRVME$wvTv# z>(OLZ3`F@gvL4+qsU%sTB-}EQZKCl78=Y#K=r>$F%fKkDmt?Z)t0eFw-f4G3QdQQ* za>u)_#&-CAOes@&EcMowa~g4{2^}C8T^YH?Ks@7pXA{u0+pnWojSb#HwvmxP63kzo z#N$fW)uioXBz$yHn)UYgv+6!m;Gfkzrf3#{iQn%Pb?*W5wl<~$_R=QhLIRvi!FHlU z+#o0U^EDyao+WuBLyb@ZWM3n>Pn)(Qm|}IMKHMA16$7^~>6CwtYMqi_Y$dCFD9EP~ zR9GF5|EL&GtKR~ON!eipX0!y=B>dxs?I9aV(oN-r#^uXhu)@z zS0Bc^YO3SahaGA#fS_fSv*?k=&tNOQ`yC^~Ow{CJRA}>wxvI@M{w19wVd`vvf)UGY z!&}5IoF|Cw0$xd zuod9!#U&fA+#?tF&PkPQZnct-WXBic@zjRXHpblb4YR3f2W!t+ec?j zmla_Rxn-K{h$bz-RjG^2rVe;gXzykHord_$T0_|o596FFV^nie4TCsSOYQjQA1?z*k>h^ODttB%$0iZz0b7xh$6CJQ2FJpDY_k1oij4u(NpK%l%Slo-V+KoRE|0`R2DQgJjgdVvo#m7@oCl=xm8NBPMr)?BOWtZgFu0H+dOP z%Hp_P;=i+?z~&B{G^a{@ha`|peDlMEY*UokitKkwDHtlkx?eWL;-0QNRlQ0q3T`hA z4+^rnd~trUv#MIEs=EYg(Q@I*B^t98tBHgNCu$u+x$NWiwxN8f-@YWmcR<7?m@cMk zG)4>~TL>Teu*AHEb5V##brcO1sh3nPmh;CRi6b_21|Elt-bGBt%-s-$=-CEnWP8vJ zl$28l4`+;*N!dxTLEm?y(`B5E1O-K(mGdxWFePO(d)-|AScL| z)Jf@Ttd;exb7E|1TD(sK-naQ639QVzNZm?KQMMaCwZ300N!hehBt~~_8d<4J+JGk8 zcj9ul0n%V3)DiDA6!=M2o`JQRZ#;^VmtXYFjcl(t-%NWWf|BaIfWTgJALfBK8uhZ` zki=-nXD}O7zp|?rwiZoxQ_?nB#R2c-jm8kDn-`N0X`NSD)1-+ZA6|YegBvS4C;u1q z9ur&Mbr6D1sIQJ>O7L7Jk$%`-rz_eaB{AHvzp;K}#hy+z{*yHIDo#BG{c(xnrp-VCFuW7`y*0bQoJM9A_RcxQqcGSr0X&w;!4He`^_d?Bi zA;|A(b{DUg8KFv>qo?dkZfMYMt2n@o7c(oBS|6GW=bu4tGH*@2BGXgaA0rs*|jD%jDHgI-sAPeiQ)E9@z3 z{k5`9B2yaEvxou(leTw(rl1@<7uNR5@Wy^flgpf|7qMmi;jx%TdBKflsr8H==^gJB_FjjBs&tfR-hh>4ktDDC0zNW z6aq5naIICt>vedb$D4zALn!5t-F)v z3B7W4sH6$v6}l+(en3XP<0z%K$8_u2AQvmycG*Oq^(qev6xi!R${_3*PFK-)oosSP zV85syp-yOkFAC+@K5OGY1VeM$$z6@%H_KLWj6sV7>N<5u`t28uMh}ZC14aEY+gTa_ zai)s`1bb9f>@OYLUUTo+Ndl(U8=LZ`oZzD%%uAzxyDctACVTTIvGnd5@HUyNZX>g# z*b!6wpi17PkFmrz-u`Y*AJH(*nw&pdb`0u%oz>&-=)6@C(7|Sxw z&l~Tk2Ih%uRMCZH&1P?sB`rChN9j*;z5Y8UAtVgI+cuFgkUJ3Z#c~*c>zJ8EQw;`E zSfK8vqu?~wb?LQT9S6j1mofuB(s+S`{mHl;-O zb@s|7X@5z7$Ryz@1#41k>;Q6S*NPBsNKNlGOIvC}(^= z>HvhSONL4hoK~r9pw!Q$O;3`IBZRO#WCwHW5kU%`sYVrIUjtHb^y{in+uGox3!^|k z86)Z!A7k({=Q{M!M{92%QC-Dig5f%k)M|r|zzB&$lB3Y8<}NFH!JfJQX+swI!V;c2E)5Koi{}}+`BDRNRo=4;ft4T0X1It*V)BGZHbi*ixo>>(!Hs&=JH zA80_LarhS>>A?`LqWioM{c%M6h-8(!2r~^)6s$9U|FQCol>QInvd4H3Qoku{HkEBF z$pqT&oP(F`XVq7OyoK^`1{b5n)BjKZ>A(MsLd0+0T=)lc~7buaz*HDyD^I*XX0tRQ&s%~vcSuz}!T1+;q zaR%X1f}8x#11g~~L9AlZ@N+Waea(~Mu98DJ8yc%G)zv&WQ!MF=O=qN1l%Z8V=a00u zsIPnFeYtrDY9al@->mh{7%HCjY@)6e+ZNh$H96SKi}RT8#Nn+9V^!bF=49QGab1$WpfJpkvLjGFEb^K5Q)0r@K2h3vCmDbrPr8BdVd%CYJ5XKxofW5v4nOu4UW^N z%RN9l9GBW%t>)U2y*kDbb>6V1p@)J%M<`}WPh|~gOi4qn+EKVxHNT_swi*ICaaeA$ z@~LZv8Xv}Nvf58XL<&cT&tjM^nlixsGcIdP?8J}`l#-XISAWgKIpW;`&XMG$qhFHy zqg=dLf5?G|C(+|r!jkzP9el0O2-mQ3`SiYVw9-+NuiPA~T4e#;v`W_;kn7ru$nl_U zpf`gLMpH`WM5!dDG1_ch>Iwh4WHV7sVkpUu>Z(_Ijy%D_Y1IdaCUC!Hyn^Rr)L?fp zk z+9nOXjivWqWYn&;19DP0f5V3$mh;7S$cAWyEEQ2iB9<*i>t{2dzm}XZ>8NG11Xhk@ zkEXUXYRj_9VEbd&xPK2EW)r=d4MNRE5l5YfnmT5y^nwfMOe-zHX3y8EW9nbTI~uP< z+1hf+*zQ(iLF93iBt>m+xj*Bw&Z{0KfS|HH<~@}ZQ#M0eY>`Xkvac{$Ofvb%sSrD( z?uawhv=@pixOB5b{$#wpk_X^zduW4d1!dN!vH^f6*sgD6%;JeZef~JlxSw?FuFHs< zz}Zc`I4i)0+c`HcPGI2TmJP;oIlrX%H046%pIi;roUDWnbm1W#LwT?F=C(8~=Kf^n zarLRikttfy!>J&c9t{ID%hksa6JXrP46gA2jsv+EX~s5So4^x`LMM4MLk*Xt34X@n z_}87ic=wOKb;?yUAoCWNS7}t?g|GeV%qO%~2ad;#(;Ip6C;YHSym6?`85jPZmglic zRwoY9N~3n-G>p?v$PjIdn!K^c>o(6hnNuZ^^8J@)HLw7r><69a!M}2HVVvgz#SiQG z-Y?;RQwjMV<{n!z zrvg8NZ>I#cnE09n1E<&{A4j|nB`f^A=tVncCrU0kx04-LwX;0ITO;{;9Ik6rh;nU6 z@+ue3MN!piR|4Z3NFZ42e;RZbke~@nMAL=IOWFYP*kFN(W3&Q(OuL!R%K2cZmt-qA z`U5!i>dpWD|9t+>|K*?mmw)>GTS_z~@hqc0DkU5G1d9e)V&ua%wunRr>Ft?XCrGeY zXUn5^<$HUf&SvU%*^FIgJM)M{EGj@F6`7pATUa-k-6Y4|XNGMvmQ_{YMK z&hxs9qsEaW>WK_TP&-N&BN>&L&)V@?1IEqP%0XJ30TTmasc6n$Sf_{|X>Nx0`9m9= zA9YUUBHkYxlQKbDD~wpHqlyGM=AqcQB)%cBoEN8a`nzLu^c>@xo+B_nS4BT@+ZvQV zl(U&mox`4ruO`5g&0z8c`&w>jmC@uT+b}Nb5XE$Pbn)gadh2`9vQ;MjO(<`Q@28m1 zZht>)6}ZBb*mRsdoWv(@;jzRu9Sn4FG7Lj(+KnJz5VWv#YeWp}ggdh4rGlZdm8 z{DJBUmE~AfIi9iwN=tOgR-5ax#u4Q*Oxs~f{IW)85)zL7ps$~|Fz#Ue6fzpe9D2qH3i#KaYQuZABIj7;jP7K`9R>_1hEiaz5B=G=-J2P8 zE%jh^Z^5LUa#ncSXn*}i&x_ez2P^$(>8H1B&iK%)kO3_3p&fXDots7S8j4J+hp-+I z*wf2d6lD%fi{v)WP}P$rwi6msapDl%Zz6ukfqHGTv;K3a@HO+O>JCxX!cVb-KpI-K#l zHg8^TiZN6h%0xY`elo5KdbUniEasaZwT0UDp{DhSvEhAdh)ecPEH)@P#3!Pj9u*!z zeFq!WpdT_Np3lLu!87ieMd5xyDV#*Zu_AZVa@C#=Jl+|@W-+gh2ls;2SI{`a~9E6ZQQ`-paTgxQnz&5_Xhg@<}D*?}N ze3VRgBWkv47%m4wEIX1-Y5>T%guFI552jPn)Fyo4a+$h)ZKFF{n)UufB4-zq_sM3k zxsZegwef=qQB}fFhWQ5VCL6847${BcWX=TKUXqUai7MDUS_kNZ85t?!0TZkpo*wl= zOzp~X*ARI`!SIDRqLyV0 zFgv`^EjGSund^ta;@jHn(P6UA9_q`K{wUyX(mb{_d$PHOJm_Wj{ z3p>)D!>^$UJ{Pk}nOHMCih%JsX_R#=JpdrcIZ7>?q%hWEy#2Bdhq|edV(2bt$!%4#5UeBtsNwQ||MG9Axj4)?UrzldMNeXE$Cl8D~2#i%;t?_C5;7 z3wsftRUU!r>+Bi#KY7sD$BLUL{CpH}>DkaNoALDXcwGI(aCL>P_jG7}!NB6D5=l&G z*^sUM%m&$OKNn@gOtygwNkX;-4YZv#lS#~hKANt*BBo%UJtY7upn)@PGslORdC*!I z4QCsrm6S?b_P!HX>6TTLAkJ#W$bv1Iu5I!Nk%^391s&FfP=U)nH6a5#=+$!9}ZC|*;=IQyv{{Gd{Hg$zAS|1&w1XjMfkrz)I{@i zh4V_{wZLf*07C*@fsT5nnxh0U4}K3dkvd~leZr_<_S}tT*Cu96Zr!gdD|61Y8`zr3=)jbB5pvjn! zaXJsq3XCj-RrG_-r+T2w=t*L0M2y)j!U0(b201aBtpzrMuNF)bN7W=&gFn)A>lD#v z0~#M!KWf^CO@ILE9)kAgr211GK{;EXvNpdMUvCMmY?`!6Wv4N-#WZmG#evhZ@6upQ zWqE^zB0riXzr4J+8~nZd4eZ0vJB?*9JPy zLo;-#8^{G83O4A78y;Aku$tz4hy z_6xn|RN0OS9BvsbigpF2GFPJ%R%9cek`t(E9vNPX@qo_>*G@Z&J}mPXsqH&wU4rqt zK8rAQVw4vNHdPwj{+eFwLyg@3$3-@D_2Z$wss2Jd``Dh;KKU2Jc0d!~v|{Rv+42%_ zGU;fQM0~x-CVx%qD6ap{---%nltcKt6L-h$|1oXDtIz-I8M`F(l{d(n53g1DiO*iy z%POvKx`Z|#J>$Gbl}imcqEePma=hs9f&QAbNF~Jjgs4I)YI6BzE8QKN<_CA>iTFq< zP%lxRa!#;Ow=b<0$Uc>`Olt5c8n37#yR@GFEu#&qa6%)8b$INV5q12N@}yfU78VU= zh1i&@Tv{&#lFXAViD}gKq_$67+BnUPO%g2f?O0hp{YK?;-{XW<)i@g|jLY30POiwL z@&=x-v+!Ow$iL4@+XmN}>Xfry2llB&)z+dUjb{yDf^{0zyJa8F7c2*z!&J`5Fcq3{xc&WH2-83# zybrNQ>(sz_uE%-Vow0Z9ibJbSftVb`DaJ7WUE2(DC&iLiZ$`0NU{jbNQ;%yVTtg?x zsWJ!Le)0O>TICYWSt%iFyB}ly59|na@IER;O@D6-D${w8&4@TWipzRd>TRMYwUT#H zz*#kiUiruySvz1ZoP$|_pvw*w+7>I0N5OoPM{l239BGSNlNF^?o#jyZ>tIaV} z>Va#3zShQMJOY-pKu}eAJzmNhf9oXjp#5aMo;D1mLukfUH66FLQfGE@Rw{B?UcQ&O zqRKK(Bv$(|Q&82(zz=!UX4h_VxjTAX~3MbpIt8Qv{dP9YC8N8!iDxh$TCPOzczz8W6O!FH<=}Vr=Sv_ zaQ3e+Pjerx`cMD&KmV71`rrTgfBvWc_n-eKYvhmJfO4{EMYTTEsD`#Gn}4Gq%&MHA z6fID_*3p*MIi`~~BGrH+H>2F%Ss`84u;~n@%je$Ng33=wiL0-fgFkhO?;U!>YfAvs zUvysZu<@e`*{CRHI*y5(rVsyVSdSC+NxqRSd!$fu%84Y!&@`(&E9Ln_$--Mi(?^EL zITv6*?+<<*AH2;>PThh#5`tqSYdpK?tXD}a82u5Ec4#GGW2q#IOm*+3Y|qO3!6%Al zjuW}_xyBMT4Zr%$d+HDLPPOw_zj=bR=adIfjBB$QdtXQ7^JkKzwNp$q9}2n{pr>n_ zRHw*?Z@~PVaYkENQdkacf8BAK&CE!R1vniQna$SWIul^YuYt->#5cLFao)12`thgnV)-R*OM&B`1CXJ_5on2SGO+{L_ib4`W$aM5?5mMir5xCer>LU0R)>=$6-5c z82A#NZ6Qq@5;Ht4pol9T%50|rd&b(> zRWt3eJJS{&`NJU5f|FeMyBve*00*U5lK<4XXW4xBShB| zyfzhLC-OxEMej==qV9%Hx=r&OSUkJp=SETxeI`RvE?gfMc@Nsq4r{yzQ}%jS`|}wv zce;$zGJVBVW!0SH`W`YaibhOh+_O_$K&f#LadWwbOv?VxINda&Vk{c9i&nbqk?Kt0 zm;JCA>)lQ35EGfLiwSnFEq8E6*2)Hpn$LacZT;DO?SrKRUCq=Ad+e_fowbzujAbL3 zWt*C)+%!%d51a)DE_;>DVy`8e7K_~;jUuwLA|-0H)hNn};p;kf9vfL(8CPKNBfR1q8K2#i^2%A4B= zN)D5$U@#Eaw?n6*hM0032jQ3dxFVhPB~|QF8cPj9LobU1SD?O`7{hb*tns@ z66^ssb)<1BPqb(n9@z^z&ah)giuE*7J*8&Bu2#}*9ArO?8;Oi3#G@MSa;7G%(i{kU zWbo7NONk571Vy;`leW1LBlg!YmKY|ix(gg@Xs%@(Q0h&=t3-;X5sWyTfkus9$=Eov zwZW-KU+eLzMJd>USs^!rmJp>4enL)RNmc;IYFVP^q9&z*9s1*7DBzQ zcYF`6UQIjl@OaW3v;+Tc_o}w>+FQ4~SzN9UizGqAzuwWlh(%{R#um>HhNY>OPOcZua30Ns-UnAV`4F@*SF0wkKL7g%h54O-dSXNn zN4(l3ULvLE;ANiR>je1Q->SHc+JKejn{`BH5#1OFyBl^sb?tHW5h!@jS}ZW@K0#TU zsjvqzqPJ{aAqIYs8=Y`la_K?8qSs_!|0%doohB;A2jl*rLZfj4x_0`OBbOd>$x;hc z{;A{yeVhOoRJQ5F95dttN6*<$i;-k2yIURjR_l72M;{=CaSl@k92wZ?pQq7qyzojE zX1z2Cf>F_dcJfV-%|@=*+qPH#&6#~J*fp_V$g#_^s4}_EfX^kkeJLMM35C*U#M6tl zr(Z6^EZ#HpED|m}r5cTdSRIHl;fhkB z58KXMIh5JyX%$^$XIM{udIh1Q=j4q{zopQo`g)7#!MFSE=QrfetgXxK+X=Zf*4{U)8EADtk654hH@U*fG?yLx6ssDqGFm5Ig&&4x&CF;%p-i4Ptg)yMKtck%w%k#V z6#IaA&!k*f7Peu9v}byM$bdj~k7XnHTf!-WfqW_oD0}0@(r+Gpc(ZiXU(|i|0-s=V z_|-qeI8`U>);70X&Zqk74|ihjR?(TF^o)0tz=W(KgXg;KW_7pWdDAWPL;IW$bZ&dY zwXIbl(-S>4+|Jh9Ik8(l&55@cpRgHISmD#kWlEgP5_J<-ny-w;acT_~SlvM=I^p`x zG0#n`P_1;z1>p$v8&Pu5Jqg566`q-`x8G=|V4_W`$ikt!Jw3D9^WN9rZ;)ACb>RCv zt?^wA{&Mwc$0{I$%jPYk0a-G(a-_mkbk}V|c`F#@#P=y?xgG#qHh56=;fWrdCV+^h z1l_$U_>D?W=QtqVrPR8>pD3Eb_!0F{F0beog)Ia&q~u|PGsEGAowoZZiR2Q@$@kS| z8?3k8b)ed!$>ihCToc>ptQfuYaUiwwohfYEp-s^`U~GoE$|rO-;5$D1)cr+0+32iB z=eqUmSc&u%f5YoOD5#D@uPr-h;54xvosVuKtREbJd-|tQzNT{?ATgk(cJ#&xt!8tm zQbs)NgNhgrO;>N-d=T-CTx}yWf9qWiB)wVpXy2l=LfEMBYhejnUfCkZNlj z?SS}Vs*}`p&Q?mHz6Etr-tnO=a6Vv}gCri>x2x-tr39x{TY*MlIoyL0^kYvprnx|H~qSEX>yJ%O&y8#bvCdmwrQ$BdaiTt{3{q_ z3t?5Ge6EUi%}QHTS|8E(aZ)%0J8R0@>X6CuB%aWCQl7WVi>+&gyeaK4`AiDuLQY1j zwE3PPwIO<;B(Y7W=m;%9osFx?ekPask=z=!O_CPnh&U4IdtIK8`=QGKTIEc@5zt-+ zkFM;NtC*F7$1Z+5hDVCM5tJ<3i^wl>c46Lw<-Ti8)s^(7)lT)SKy46zKVOo1^!{gy zK0GwQ9t~JHLQQ-@*|ZZjB-c%puLn?a9Ti2`#rB*t2ymCyi$NF=W$y@CGXTzYIs%qu z{>m!T4pDgB#u=_`4ndgHU-f=qNf;_^zW^BB})m6B?;qcy~Xr zPL=rXy(W_YkT~LFUUA)x&K|huRErp)af7Cye07&j1+gBf+U zqYc8*xlK&B^D%a~P-is+zS$9T^v!bPh#uJQR*fS>hbqElYSB%rxk%_ccR=1nUM|lujbs`pP~@ z>o;W|jpYAWQb2^nxoBBY!PN<`6@IM?yd=fuaUIeBGjAhZj91Ad9@r}!JVVj0?4N7b zh`W=Fy}r{J!pXe&;#2f60FTc_9_8-#OFSc;AxcG}C4mSh>7RbR8pm7AFmf%VtoU`x z&wpJ4`&%lw6||vVTPU$yN&ZG8HfoDMI?M>xrTMOX94vvH!;}Cb_)hJyNwt2aOh^Pp zR}Ve4JQL#!k5iDa49gBU2$mFP3dR9`8N#eeVx+Fwa7<&?yQ+0&Yzrnx7FXK^Xa&hC zI$lCzZL^dT;0JQi5tg)Lys>?eOFq6Avyk}dqSRE|yqpBMCw_a8VGtF-294tpE!AoC zda?--crVL|vvLUDz<5u$K2g1fA7U0BFu_1=uEYalUT^jLCx^Kt9p(OUAaZ69hh&nP zUsluz+Yd`eeA$L0n+*;))NqC63iL`|X`A+viEVo@o-^wg#8`GY-71?g>}eS1)2&TF zPv!OVOt`3NDO`f-?ktr0+?4`|Tvat^)7!b+w2hB)$O={_8kEgffV*lSMsKL7%GfB5 z>4GmSVwBN{DmkWXk#-#cu`g6SUHJ><%2IXQUc7Ec+b)QyvjNX4AO@(`^NpNIK==M^q=gs)9toA9NgHWMOw64DA&Z0A&afO@T^nYaE)a3sW zzg|3dImn7kc^%b5!Yw+4`#I9~W__*}UdTh!UN7z(%fNUfG6L8Imf>AijAhhA2fKzc z_G~^A`C!j# zzahK6exSo7I;wewb^-QXdDOZJNG4sXi1Jxn33P5AmmWFGsN0rw5_JGL| zIa-gapOJ+a?G8yuyjYO%B(8`w4^r86#ob}gP9xr)J*VY_-^{hG&PjLX6R#QKltH|Z z=Fb}Wyru%;1yE{bkY4Y`z(%`iS!J4|2w3c~iKK1|m$V-pqaOE_nA%7W6IaJsKCnjK&|=S^j_on6Pms{x z&ukEE&D?g`{B^VAQ4q@PecQ(oq59c8eS%m36;>Y{D34PuR>%IJ)EGI)Ku5`lgG(#i zp;wajnyww&NRMuR^C-h<*9ZD-`+95*lgUGH1yS;rAI~e&hE`!!Rz@E=F`|%*aPQ&0 z(orG)K+}%95*L(Fn5#qKJMG}=^QtJXB|D+%DB?*IJTw$wB?a8NRws`j%`>8nMqpIk z>e=3xccmx#`bv@NfhDOaMt{?)h~?F8?OR2dKB2ja5r{mv^!YcxLElGB~-aJ&T!q`2I?x zDg)Uos>=aZj_jFQ?7!T0Yrml?%wdLP%%C!Yw-;Y0hzFKtJ=9qZc@JrN@;umUDK70J zaP)N4>#IU-9|0e>EdV6QfYTvX8AxvR=!_I`1bS8PRrep!S=ZSibp)(7)uFVU(f-

JU zh7VaiWBSkeCwN>WdnPh4YXlo(-$aa#lYL5mPJA{Gi|^fqQ`!R#bwbKISVvv)Mwbmm zj9i9YqCm%SkP59O&HIBPJ}!I*rj^m6DJFI2RK~k<<;$7DpN#27mVnQJ;ZR&9w=wkZ z&w#H|IMJ-rD#>to!m(X+ZlyRh-rgnSByrG{-JE>XW~J?~d=g$3wZ2!1a480$AKi35 zvF(Z_sl2RJOee2h)<6NvpvRxLp8&|{B2rpkZWNLa2YmyBLT*)c_a*_NeWMy^DGSWWKzsF@#JQmAG7TUTV*LIEy z#zyAZ$dQDNl?V!bDZaMU%Kxt`1DqvDReIgE!=BR~DFwny#^>-W~!aca#kT2*3g%lLE$1 z%3VkM;w3B1AC+i}8X8o?joqB>u!oF2o~Tfxx9sF@GEIYuLkr=H3&Chr;c?mnt^{(o!dfv76TC2Lcy0$oUprQ|b=&pFx zS+IKBa+?Xo(ybx?cb`zlgSime&mMDDWiV-wz}r; zhv)j6Qr6Q)bIoTC?Dlb&nK!-uENJ#Nn@1w9)kuNuCc@oV4r;^P&K1#xAUf3Waaz!D zLR3Ve7b8@YON)?}70cX-C^N8BaYozrZbE>V(VSUN`Ugi%BLVOSElMOZAi`6xFx|w@+F#rqa5Ytoxg$gRGe0J(8z> z;8>-qjre}ZG=)zheyLOMm_U9}Ku;6eDQ9Shat-=nLm!$~BzIFq{;rK~$jppdI@m*& zQ8>$Bp?;{K-}uJ~v3Ex}n6CTR_*x22v(>z2dLQ!5j`>YX8t;!?j?T^fvOGoY{e(t2 z#8u|;71~NWR|7RhXD1wL6(L~wpe4Lz%-kp-=5U_9(leM#MD{0L?^TVGZy3?3N0~UB z`O9QUc1IP4ZAxhD8N?cjBf^w%L&isZwQ=EE^XkP#_UDVc3N|#4Gv4{pj|ppQVcYtN zkawjEI2|aC%HEKlmMB*3jd0eh-Bz=bA9DjE3Ee+>&wciY-LYzT@uFiMBr)zoFzWuTSqHk$rr=N>x}KL|lDRF5>^qVu5_NYj)FFLKHg^SVj+n15)WSxW^9 zDRZkL^<680Ho0s0A~#FT^Gh|PupOCk+ww9x1I##76)`ZS)r2?0TMOCGoXTq5`&Wow zZQ#01fQa|DGNhy|?NaEEvhGFiitXqbyy4~|>c1pM|K|0vP6qKr^f*gbnU-NX*GY60 z$re@<>wUE(uOg7wfV5^LYBmGS+1KRVm_tVPPSrMTpY%Cy4%>cvBB93nRbf6<3$hT> z=&-LkDtC2to^BV0$eTV+WY&P(%YzffYS9ocV&tRh3zDMO&OkyHRP0QxR0hO6C?zJV z{>r%OM?+fvdH-fhv)bREnM3s`g{z@v zo{T~o-L9%kL}(!GBK|#4;JLxYPBSRWXdM-spHr70uNHJ6|hzs#MAKC z7?W5ec4!PoUzv^CiI|~C<5f9T*fi02Ims^3;lvV&!m8;jfMVNi&C}HgqSV>S1d;S+ zx~QbNE%W#;Y>U;WVrETF^=kTHxq`?Vaa!>zi%Q9L?VKw^5qdFrlh{KZzwkQXOXp}4 z%A+j&_}AmV=sjhdSwhX0Cy`PhoN~qqzlVQrk|pEeL1mG-kUFYO9bx>2I^r^%v*s;d4G53+-K0Frf-YGCWFEW|s%_S^55bK*U}`q? zyB*UquK^wKqjL$_f#jxLQlRV7cYoI8h??frean4bd>UEN<4hhE^t5+ucx#*#KrBN? z%^|_%o*D+PK?Ao89(~iwD|M*E*+ePQk2)|s_REHvBUH)tx1Y9wG=i+G-B)BB5Qb~r zhUWZ~Z!XCG&{-Ts2-iBk=D|Q)fPPp2BGCfFAOkZ~7zslPiM@xy&|5E^N8Eeu#qSKT zxp8Oxsq}LC+tRr@QfcfBLiYsbBY0QSdjZF5wkR<^a&ddorNul9@*$c(s}TFXTjWWf zN<&{$jw(i-mk=1&S=njnbJQZ*?{XI1TazKnc+}>YGqmDAe>^z2EPA^oT<@7wmRd_1 zmyyjsiUp3w6kE2pJaTgf9y`YI^&|`>cr%ak+8xx1lZX-zW;ovDyg65J)t3{sX7Py> z$4^eYc})sV6=lbAogRlnu2^aooN^{AS{w+?Ii+Y!e<3SdU7pHIwe&r1mql(9Djl~|3YD%m&?tSt`_07u*#A~< z6fRhs?rCSr*zHTcp>eX0|#Y%FeQNq{-8f>y&i21IDm)A+U{jHR61m9$3xlX zVZ>k@z!PoM5iG|msk&a5>aWf}*oVfjUV)#vw<&w@wKGRCA~`v8o_|3%v{{DSPG*;1 zg-BWqi7!eXN8Y8O*|?>8XRGx@@g0e`i`VjT+^v`1PJpB!#Kx zM90T0{RfCLL9$AVkG-9*1!@z<+>X*2-)l@ZigE9FIxvO&8Okie zU)2+C;m=sT)q>Q_3fqL9)dy z4M5WkxOlgqD&h!FnGa9E_=P5kN;D4*;({VjPXCp%PCHq;zO{mKQ3zU3giSyY23)U` z&ch}hJ+H+0v^fJXh+IoQ;OvE5H-zp-Mm5FtBzGmpZJKj}g>WTp&G?)( zeoAMH7z;B)EOvrbpD1|?S0zs&t&S=vr3F3;?CB5fa#hz!C>`KBx)X|6qEiY+`lp~p zoU&1B-d2m4K=L<7aWnP!68cubiGdS_HOvpdy$$ehi~Zz-pHQtDc4QWRle5oOHc$D# z4A9Y&%*tggnb6c*lB!=41lP2T6EqoyOr9f^#|TJVYvrg6 zz!v^@v`dSGC4>_;`#1IK-gVTGXJbf~vsm%3v64X&eg{iN(ysUZWfrrv}H zYwL@HFdIfkj;hv7yI~yjZ2_5CvkNh;t zLMQ-V`20-hLoeh)u7AxE=8dV&?iWm-PVKiznJ@bi%)b0!^;)4c(F#v!WYFY>0tz3u zwupRzT9ti37yrEWjQb{u4Z^gvqi8`mIu;wdiS3$rPccP5c~@1g0NfZL}x&zR4m*!x2-IL?o0%=fHC3%}mDULS7oiSF|S zJ~5JLHM(fU>V%(QI1l3+ywIWaUfzmBtw`r*b;a9p#Va$c+s;gL%Ao(Sp3_LqxNHiPV^6fbf1WGs26*u>5HL1Gh%r+gh+9O7Ur; zx$2s2zOklFwoE*#1K%$h#p2I&EJSuV0;LKe7ObmIHLS^-Ro_wz=&9h*hxa;}y5G+L zq+8|`@#a6#n{B6iMDc{kfHYUbFV=)>ap)&X1|c!tbmvW%nJ0>-hFd~#qQ!GgyC7qc zkyCA-{3=1z3QoKz9ZBywZi!;uo#xe&1he#H&2XpD#1>{cnWfb0tG5OeKrZW3<8T%) zTHVOhBTfa&Mikj-RItwP$r+3`{26Iqivwbp=3L-BjY{E$FtF%kL8U*#2lx zcaNi55d{8uqbp$w2WvN)8O5-8Y~oJ|I~VcItmm}7tcUh4O!H-aD3yMpWuQc7dG!gD z**@dS`rVoPc3PUc zJGY0SnyCD=MUe?ED<>}?Tdd}cj}eFi@RcYHsX3$)pQ%$u8jB;wSrZX&r`%g2hkaY4 z>8HX_jHC(ILdqIbJ;Q-3y1>mmq%+g1BR#Xx0hl>|Gyl3DTU0k?sb@RemnR$dS>;~u zU2Gc72!69a1pO#T!G$xjH#&8EX`@kRXyVeVJ=SqvAek@YA|6j(!9FuX+Mg6SxJoDL zN=Lji98iI3MIhGY$dlc%9mehVnJ)Bfain}8pTBCYecX79w<$@lYGKUFK}``^pie67 zg;|~XPfAPI>|)|=jb6LZkLyugsyg&Mh+js~CMCD=WB&Y6W9~J`hNyP=0SPas8T_F_A29)r_czxqjj0$x0GVU6Yfx z<&3ZaAXa*kFL|F@m!={}SQ4mka1gY&t)Rw}i4UaRC33CZ#nhTLh$@SzA|Tn`8c%w3 z%CW88p+PvuU&t5zU@wrW;&lS#KR&{l^Q(gELq~p#z@GIZ)L(OmaAUtW|J)2 zhBy@0e^zt+1Q-(hQuv+m(sGVZdAZOFWw(;-a9Pf;?8VT#61&B42^oBA``%o9zATWE z0q+_}BjEkRle&wiB7mxHX1bPj<<2@d$d55Y;ea!GSSp<1$5zJhh-J(-upNklCB zb_9NbBPjQoAp3{3D@*a@6FcT{MWNw+e$Hw0E{_p} z-0wIKdpwm~UpEB{J3R7kW?i%0eDA(<#W>^I6VJ$M+=?A$3sfy<(!n*4f@xEKS976V z#!9#doX&`vna$HvdEsJ3-2QgIRePG!h0tROn>p%J!^gP3K8GW|$}sGrCftj*i>6Aw zXdP)sO#31k82Z7qvb*7Zx9GOt2l}rT?Ct1Cn)Ku`v~u0Th*Cu|#IwNLTvkqd;YII< z$#OmBb?MsXrta*QJ5hlQtg)>L$w(_k*a)P_NdyQXi59B3Y6s4eHOyoJGmFNmVZF3L zT&R0K;eOnov1)HOWV4ChqO0R;ZO0-W(q*s21so{|jwuX%wzavE)Zg>BiO*+<#b(ZaM)>E>JmQti zS3GwB3h_!bMtZ4|PL6NA4gLX~81`z(+?k*=-^h2v`O12pU=ML@z1z3R?TmMXJA#KYK94i_tnfqq1WvOJTfzZDi6}9wA;X z&RW#(OlFISwf`;i%OO5$5r~%5^NdUSCt%ZWn8q`Pjv`T@(T;nY7;HHCSa;G|(W;G+ zoiQWzw362|l|bQDEl6u=G>M_#Rl{PrY7WJk*|$>{(vQE>VWlKUt(&-STQJD6`wmue z&)&UMY@a((OFzxZ@Jg9QTK#4BOeEfw*bwP(MWav?SvQ-GC+?NJxRu}{HMJ4?+jlW6 zT;2k<+CcSd1S+Kx*Z}WN4Vs9nB#xrvlF<0UO+m>i$}9fCD3>;k$Pd{S!b?G03f79m zREGBy;!+>gr7S^0>;jEr9Mf~cvKGjX&O`HZ)TXW?P}M>>kzuKX2F)ei8Q0qvNfQT9 z)OT2BJfHDC9FLm~T$Gr5N^{#AsKibV8K=dKU9jTHkjU~WI=IJPT{efPft>F0%LmyT zxgxPd^HH++t0y_G1iNg!2Q4xSgFNdr0?Dx4cYoOLP30P?$z4hYL49Z>3i9JE?K~D+ zLAHMVGzJ5D>aQw6nTbWw$JZ`~>I!w$$w8k~-X7`!O%^|in278dFuV0gGRhsThu<=- zKT>T-N|9+WA#dX3!=d$Mqx)*vHmJ}?drZ=aL3GA0k7n_i$Yk5D@w8~}7UkpZt}!XD zSrGTCvIi(nFiItmTxBfdKw^rcKxe&*JKk3sVpKM&uLo4 z-W8}XDK0RSiZtP{y4G7#!+pOu=al)SQxh6YEx?Ma z9ZW!>Hmt3iUh1@E25#CUk5^wXEmn&-M>o9K@mR=KeuZc(pCA3y$c;EEE?Sn6r-)yC zj$#<>kgDFjxfGSzvh1vqqB*~4&G6%)SWx*BWC55BQ9BX}1$Xg{{kL+tY)4mlqU1 z`mhBgaHKp`GZBUUg4q7F&;V1u^@bXL7X5Cy*?y;+q{T0b%0+kP`$qqh-YlG znz_B`XF&m^>xdFUP9f_nhHk%y>*I{Lfp58}+f`mtQ4HJ>%GC;U>H(Je$lhSH#Eo$T zoOpW2PYj%sR4i)Wkq|q;v8W&JKd;KLx+HyH@jjp?VfEtdJik8b2hFkKuH~tA8fSR6 znk%@Co&2bMrucaEAw%}nhbIC}C;X>p$dy{|^2;Y&_+>8iN-&ixbVt)qO}AFyY}cQh z3!j@+K)XJcGr~J>t;J#ax`bZDGM#EX93V%}sx|^uXi_Xs#`$ zu>DJh!{4trsLu!98v2u1T?rW_(*1GVFAMn z=*j_t>1pp`>+!c9>^y4+Q^U|%6aawm4@XXr|BZXvSvy;E{;TEwn*;)cX+R!ktCbA^ z!2Ux*9qs>n;OXaN{a5>87&sEjF!vo{@xuE9o`>c0UxBc3b@9|Pw{ZGv0l={(*-pUt z8Cd@Q*@i{mRLk$ZwTJQF k1pc$Q|14l?qJKN^pE*=lLWEfY05D)D0G516)<1Xu1MJpHg8%>k diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-1.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-1.mdx index 3e006ef..0ce4f99 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-1.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-1.mdx @@ -1,1477 +1,6381 @@ --- -title: "Chapitre 1 — Fondements épistémologiques et modélisation" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Chapitre 1 — Fondements épistémologiques et modélisation +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 20 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_1—Fondements_epistemologiques_et_modelisation_Archicratie-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_1—Fondements_epistemologiques_et_modelisation_Archicratie-version_officielle.docx --- -Si les sciences politiques ont longtemps trouvé leur ancrage et leur légitimité dans l’analyse des institutions formelles du pouvoir – souveraineté, contrat, autorité, représentation – c’est que le politique y était toujours présumé se manifester à travers une scène, un lieu, un sujet, un régime. Le pouvoir y avait des signes, des corps, des textes ; il procédait d’un fondement — Dieu, la volonté générale, la loi, la nation — et d’un opérateur identifié : le prince, le peuple, le juge, l’État. De la théorie de Hobbes à celle de Rawls, en passant par Rousseau ou Habermas, les paradigmes de légitimation sont fondés sur une ontologie de la centralité, de la scène constituante, et d’un sujet instituant dont l’autonomie garantit la normativité du pouvoir. -Or, ce que nos régimes contemporains de régulation mettent désormais en crise, ce n’est pas tant la scène elle-même, que la possibilité de sa tenue effective. La scène subsiste, peut-être, mais elle est vidée, ritualisée, simulée, remplacée, saturée ou dissoute dans des procédures techniques, des protocoles logistiques, des décisions sans auteurs, des gouvernances algorithmiques. Le pouvoir opère comme s’il n’avait plus à se déclarer, régule sur des justifications faiblement exposables, et agit dans des configurations où la mise en débat est neutralisée, comprimée ou vidée de prise. Non pas qu’il soit tyrannique, autoritaire ou caché au sens classique, mais parce qu’il ne se donne plus à la critique selon les formes instituées de l’opposabilité politique. Cela ne signifie pas que toute scène praticable ait disparu ; cela signifie plutôt que leur repérage, leur préservation et leur réactivation deviennent le problème politique décisif de notre temps. +Si les sciences politiques ont longtemps trouvé leur ancrage et leur +légitimité dans l'analyse des institutions formelles du pouvoir — souveraineté, contrat, autorité, représentation — c'est que le +politique y était toujours présumé se manifester à travers une scène, un +lieu, un sujet, un régime. Le pouvoir y avait des signes, des corps, des +textes ; il procédait d'un fondement — Dieu, la volonté générale, la +loi, la nation — et d'un opérateur identifié : le prince, le peuple, +le juge, l'État. De la théorie de Hobbes à celle de Rawls, en passant +par Rousseau ou Habermas, les paradigmes de légitimation sont fondés sur +une ontologie de la centralité, de la scène constituante, et d'un sujet +instituant dont l'autonomie garantit la normativité du pouvoir. -Il faut ici prévenir un contresens majeur. L’archicratie ne désigne ni le nom savant des fermetures contemporaines de la scène politique, ni la simple description d’un monde où la régulation opérerait désormais sans comparution. Elle ne nomme pas l’état de fait, désirable ou indésirable, des régulations contemporaines ; elle désigne la condition sous laquelle une régulation peut être dite politiquement habitable. Elle ne se confond donc ni avec les formes actuelles de neutralisation de l’épreuve, ni avec les dispositifs qui poursuivent leur opération tout en comprimant, mimant ou relocalisant hors d’atteinte la scène de leur propre mise en discussion. +Or, ce que nos régimes contemporains de régulation mettent désormais en +crise, ce n'est pas tant la scène elle-même, que la possibilité de sa +tenue effective. La scène subsiste, peut-être, mais elle est vidée, +ritualisée, simulée, remplacée, saturée ou dissoute dans des procédures +techniques, des protocoles logistiques, des décisions sans auteurs, des +gouvernances algorithmiques. Le pouvoir opère comme s'il n'avait plus à +se déclarer, régule sur des justifications faiblement exposables, et +agit dans des configurations où la mise en débat est neutralisée, +comprimée ou vidée de prise. Non pas qu'il soit tyrannique, autoritaire +ou caché au sens classique, mais parce qu'il ne se donne plus à la +critique selon les formes instituées de l'opposabilité politique. Cela +ne signifie pas que toute scène praticable ait disparu ; cela signifie +plutôt que leur repérage, leur préservation et leur réactivation +deviennent le problème politique décisif de notre temps. -Il faut donc maintenir avec netteté une distinction doctrinale que tout le présent travail suppose. L’archicratie désigne le cadre de viabilité dans lequel fondation, opération et épreuve demeurent suffisamment articulées pour qu’une régulation puisse encore se rendre explicable, opposable et révisable. La désarchicration désigne au contraire le processus par lequel cette articulation se défait : la scène se retire, le différé se contracte, l’opposabilité s’affaiblit, sans que pour autant les régulations cessent d’opérer. Quant à l’autarchicratie, elle nomme la dérive-limite dans laquelle l’ordre régulateur tend à ne plus rencontrer d’autre mesure que sa propre effectuation, en produisant ses critères de validité à même ses procédures, ses instruments et ses résultats. +Il faut ici prévenir un contresens majeur. L'archicratie ne désigne ni +le nom savant des fermetures contemporaines de la scène politique, ni la +simple description d'un monde où la régulation opérerait désormais sans +comparution. Elle ne nomme pas l'état de fait, désirable ou indésirable, +des régulations contemporaines ; elle désigne la condition sous laquelle +une régulation peut être dite politiquement habitable. Elle ne se +confond donc ni avec les formes actuelles de neutralisation de +l'épreuve, ni avec les dispositifs qui poursuivent leur opération tout +en comprimant, mimant ou relocalisant hors d'atteinte la scène de leur +propre mise en discussion. -Elle n’est pas le concept glorifié d’une mutation silencieuse du pouvoir ; elle est ce par quoi cette mutation devient intelligible comme perte, comme désajustement, comme désarticulation de la tenue politique. C’est seulement à cette condition qu’elle peut fonctionner comme paradigme critique des régulations contemporaines, et non comme leur simple redoublement lexical. +Il faut donc maintenir avec netteté une distinction doctrinale que tout +le présent travail suppose. L'archicratie désigne le cadre de viabilité +dans lequel fondation, opération et épreuve demeurent suffisamment +articulées pour qu'une régulation puisse encore se rendre explicable, +opposable et révisable. La désarchicration désigne au contraire le +processus par lequel cette articulation se défait : la scène se retire, +le différé se contracte, l'opposabilité s'affaiblit, sans que pour +autant les régulations cessent d'opérer. Quant à l'autarchicratie, elle +nomme la dérive-limite dans laquelle l'ordre régulateur tend à ne plus +rencontrer d'autre mesure que sa propre effectuation, en produisant ses +critères de validité à même ses procédures, ses instruments et ses +résultats. -L’ambition de ce chapitre est donc de fonder ce paradigme nouveau, ou plus exactement, de nommer et d’outiller une forme ancienne mais non encore pensée du pouvoir — la régulation contradictoire instituée. Cette forme, nous la nommons *archicratie*, non pour désigner un régime de plus, mais pour désigner un méta-régime viable de régulation lorsqu’une triade — *arcalité* (fondation déclarable), *cratialité* (opération traçable), *archicration* (épreuve instituée différée) — se tient en tenségrité, c’est-à-dire en tension dynamique métastable l’un à l’autre. +Elle n'est pas le concept glorifié d'une mutation silencieuse du pouvoir +; elle est ce par quoi cette mutation devient intelligible comme perte, +comme désajustement, comme désarticulation de la tenue politique. C'est +seulement à cette condition qu'elle peut fonctionner comme paradigme +critique des régulations contemporaines, et non comme leur simple +redoublement lexical. -Les paradigmes classiques — qu’ils soient contractualistes, décisionnistes ou délibératifs — peinent désormais à rendre pleinement compte de ces formes. Le pouvoir n’est plus localisé dans un lieu, il ne procède plus d’une scène constituante unique, il n’est plus incarné par un sujet identifiable. Il opère à travers une multiplicité de dispositifs hétérogènes, qui se soutiennent les uns les autres sans principe transcendant, selon une logique de capture, de redondance, de saturation ou d’euphémisation. Michel Foucault l’avait annoncé dès la fin des années 1970 avec son analyse de la gouvernementalité : « ce qui se met en place, ce n’est plus le droit de faire mourir ou de laisser vivre, mais le pouvoir de faire vivre et de laisser mourir » (1976). Hannah Arendt, bien avant lui, avait déjà diagnostiqué que « la disparition de la scène publique, c’est la disparition de la politique elle-même » (1958). Claude Lefort, dans *L’Invention démocratique*, avait désigné le pouvoir démocratique comme un lieu vide — précisément parce que sa légitimité dépend de la possibilité constante de remise en scène, de re-questionnement, de re-distribution. Mais que reste-t-il lorsque cette vacance est non plus instituante, mais neutralisée par des automatismes ? Lorsque la scène est formellement prévue mais substantiellement empêchée ? Lorsque les voies de recours sont techniques, absconses, et différées jusqu’à l’oubli ? +L'ambition de ce chapitre est donc de fonder ce paradigme nouveau, ou +plus exactement, de nommer et d'outiller une forme ancienne mais non +encore pensée du pouvoir — la régulation contradictoire instituée. +Cette forme, nous la nommons *archicratie*, non pour désigner un régime +de plus, mais pour désigner un méta-régime viable de régulation +lorsqu'une triade — *arcalité* (fondation déclarable), *cratialité* +(opération traçable), *archicration* (épreuve instituée différée) — se +tient en tenségrité, c'est-à-dire en tension dynamique métastable l'un à +l'autre. -Ce que nous voyons proliférer, ce ne sont donc pas des régulations archicratiques au sens fort, mais des configurations de désarchicration, parfois portées jusqu’à la dérive autarchicratique. Il s’agit de dispositifs qui continuent d’opérer tout en neutralisant, mimant ou relocalisant hors d’atteinte la scène de leur propre mise en discussion ; de régulations où les fondements deviennent difficilement exposables, où les motifs se dérobent à l’opposabilité, et où le temps du différé se trouve comprimé, vidé de sa prise ou rendu fictif. Ce qui s’y altère n’est pas l’existence de la régulation, mais sa tenue politique : non parce qu’il n’y aurait plus de normes, de procédures ou de décisions, mais parce que celles-ci tendent à se soustraire à l’épreuve qui les rendrait effectivement discutables. +Les paradigmes classiques — qu'ils soient contractualistes, +décisionnistes ou délibératifs — peinent désormais à rendre pleinement +compte de ces formes. Le pouvoir n'est plus localisé dans un lieu, il ne +procède plus d'une scène constituante unique, il n'est plus incarné par +un sujet identifiable. Il opère à travers une multiplicité de +dispositifs hétérogènes, qui se soutiennent les uns les autres sans +principe transcendant, selon une logique de capture, de redondance, de +saturation ou d'euphémisation. Michel Foucault l'avait annoncé dès la +fin des années 1970 avec son analyse de la gouvernementalité : « ce qui +se met en place, ce n'est plus le droit de faire mourir ou de laisser +vivre, mais le pouvoir de faire vivre et de laisser mourir » (1976). +Hannah Arendt, bien avant lui, avait déjà diagnostiqué que « la +disparition de la scène publique, c'est la disparition de la politique +elle-même » (1958). Claude Lefort, dans *L'Invention démocratique*, +avait désigné le pouvoir démocratique comme un lieu vide — précisément +parce que sa légitimité dépend de la possibilité constante de remise en +scène, de re-questionnement, de re-distribution. Mais que reste-t-il +lorsque cette vacance est non plus instituante, mais neutralisée par des +automatismes ? Lorsque la scène est formellement prévue mais +substantiellement empêchée ? Lorsque les voies de recours sont +techniques, absconses, et différées jusqu'à l'oubli ? -Il nous faut alors un paradigme, non pour idéaliser une alternative, mais pour diagnostiquer cette configuration et la rendre intelligible, pensable, opposable. Car c’est bien cela qui définit un paradigme : sa capacité à faire apparaître ce qui était jusque-là neutralisé. Le paradigme archicratique ne vise pas à remplacer les théories classiques du pouvoir, mais à leur adjoindre une grammaire supplémentaire, permettant de nommer ce qui échappait à leurs catégories. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de savoir qui gouverne, mais comment se tiennent les régulations lorsque les légitimations deviennent faiblement visibles, lorsque les scènes instituées sont neutralisées, vidées ou relocalisées hors d’atteinte, et lorsque les temporalités différées de la décision se trouvent comprimées, fictives ou pratiquement supprimées. Il s’agit ainsi de rendre compte des zones grises, des seuils, des bifurcations et des fonctions qui régulent sans jamais statuer. +Ce que nous voyons proliférer, ce ne sont donc pas des régulations +archicratiques au sens fort, mais des configurations de désarchicration, +parfois portées jusqu'à la dérive autarchicratique. Il s'agit de +dispositifs qui continuent d'opérer tout en neutralisant, mimant ou +relocalisant hors d'atteinte la scène de leur propre mise en discussion +; de régulations où les fondements deviennent difficilement exposables, +où les motifs se dérobent à l'opposabilité, et où le temps du différé se +trouve comprimé, vidé de sa prise ou rendu fictif. Ce qui s'y altère +n'est pas l'existence de la régulation, mais sa tenue politique : non +parce qu'il n'y aurait plus de normes, de procédures ou de décisions, +mais parce que celles-ci tendent à se soustraire à l'épreuve qui les +rendrait effectivement discutables. -Dans cette perspective, ce chapitre se donne pour tâche de poser les fondements épistémologiques, conceptuels et politiques du paradigme archicratique. Nous y exposerons son architecture théorique tripolaire — *arcalité* (ce qui fonde), *cratialité* (ce qui opère), *archicration* (ce qui permet la dispute) — ainsi que sa grammaire topologique interne/externe, ses objets de repérage concrets (fonctions, seuils, porteurs, signes, temporalités), et enfin ses critères de validité. Nous chercherons à produire une cartographie intelligible des formes de régulation contemporaine, sans tomber dans le cynisme ni dans l’utopie, mais en nommant avec précision les tensions, les prises, les scènes, les ruptures, les points aveugles. +Il nous faut alors un paradigme, non pour idéaliser une alternative, +mais pour diagnostiquer cette configuration et la rendre intelligible, +pensable, opposable. Car c'est bien cela qui définit un paradigme : sa +capacité à faire apparaître ce qui était jusque-là neutralisé. Le +paradigme archicratique ne vise pas à remplacer les théories classiques +du pouvoir, mais à leur adjoindre une grammaire supplémentaire, +permettant de nommer ce qui échappait à leurs catégories. Il ne s'agit +plus seulement de savoir qui gouverne, mais comment se tiennent les +régulations lorsque les légitimations deviennent faiblement visibles, +lorsque les scènes instituées sont neutralisées, vidées ou relocalisées +hors d'atteinte, et lorsque les temporalités différées de la décision se +trouvent comprimées, fictives ou pratiquement supprimées. Il s'agit +ainsi de rendre compte des zones grises, des seuils, des bifurcations et +des fonctions qui régulent sans jamais statuer. -Car penser l’archicratie, ce n’est pas inventer un concept : c’est l’extraire du réel pour en faire un outil de diagnostic, un test de viabilité des régulations, et un levier de critique effective des dispositifs. C’est interroger ce qui gouverne à débat neutralisé, ce qui ordonne sur des justifications difficilement exposables, ce qui affecte en se soustrayant aux formes ordinaires de visibilité, de contestation et de reprise. C’est rouvrir la possibilité d’une pensée politique critique du réel. +Dans cette perspective, ce chapitre se donne pour tâche de poser les +fondements épistémologiques, conceptuels et politiques du paradigme +archicratique. Nous y exposerons son architecture théorique tripolaire — *arcalité* (ce qui fonde), *cratialité* (ce qui opère), +*archicration* (ce qui permet la dispute) — ainsi que sa grammaire +topologique interne/externe, ses objets de repérage concrets (fonctions, +seuils, porteurs, signes, temporalités), et enfin ses critères de +validité. Nous chercherons à produire une cartographie intelligible des +formes de régulation contemporaine, sans tomber dans le cynisme ni dans +l'utopie, mais en nommant avec précision les tensions, les prises, les +scènes, les ruptures, les points aveugles. -Si la modernité politique a trouvé dans la souveraineté représentative son axe structurant, sa fiction fondatrice et sa promesse régulatrice, cette architecture intellectuelle et institutionnelle semble aujourd’hui en proie à une désynchronisation profonde avec les formes effectives de la régulation contemporaine. La souveraineté, dans sa formulation classique — qu’elle s’incarne dans le peuple, la nation, l’État, le contrat ou la loi — présuppose une centralité décisionnelle, une légitimité visible, une continuité symbolique entre le fondement et l’exercice du pouvoir. +Car penser l'archicratie, ce n'est pas inventer un concept : c'est +l'extraire du réel pour en faire un outil de diagnostic, un test de +viabilité des régulations, et un levier de critique effective des +dispositifs. C'est interroger ce qui gouverne à débat neutralisé, ce qui +ordonne sur des justifications difficilement exposables, ce qui affecte +en se soustrayant aux formes ordinaires de visibilité, de contestation +et de reprise. C'est rouvrir la possibilité d'une pensée politique +critique du réel. -Or, ce que nous observons aujourd’hui dans la majorité des dispositifs régulateurs, c’est moins une crise de la légitimité déclarée de la souveraineté représentative qu’une crise de sa capacité à structurer les prises réelles sur le monde. La scène parlementaire subsiste, mais elle est fréquemment contournée ; les mécanismes électoraux se perpétuent, mais ils échouent souvent à peser sur les déterminations majeures ; les figures institutionnelles traditionnelles persistent, mais elles ne sont plus toujours les lieux effectifs de production, de justification et de révision des normes. Ce déphasage — structurel, et non conjoncturel — ne signifie pas la disparition du politique, mais la transformation de ses modes de régulation. +Si la modernité politique a trouvé dans la souveraineté représentative +son axe structurant, sa fiction fondatrice et sa promesse régulatrice, +cette architecture intellectuelle et institutionnelle semble aujourd'hui +en proie à une désynchronisation profonde avec les formes effectives de +la régulation contemporaine. La souveraineté, dans sa formulation +classique — qu'elle s'incarne dans le peuple, la nation, l'État, le +contrat ou la loi — présuppose une centralité décisionnelle, une +légitimité visible, une continuité symbolique entre le fondement et +l'exercice du pouvoir. -À cette crise de la souveraineté s’ajoute l’épuisement des grilles de lecture fondées sur le sujet autonome, contractuel et rationnel, figure centrale de la philosophie politique moderne. La fiction du citoyen-individu, maître de lui-même, capable d’entrer en délibération avec autrui et de participer à une volonté générale informée, n’a plus de prise suffisante sur des architectures décisionnelles automatisées, sur des normes codifiées par délégation, sur des processus algorithmiques opérant à distance ou sans concertation réelle. Le sujet y est souvent affecté avant même d’avoir été informé ; inclus sans être consulté ; contraint sans pouvoir formuler un désaccord effectivement opposable. La subjectivité politique classique se trouve ainsi contournée par des formats de décision qui n’appellent plus nécessairement ni la volonté, ni la délibération, ni même la conscience explicite des sujets affectés. +Or, ce que nous observons aujourd'hui dans la majorité des dispositifs +régulateurs, c'est moins une crise de la légitimité déclarée de la +souveraineté représentative qu'une crise de sa capacité à structurer les +prises réelles sur le monde. La scène parlementaire subsiste, mais elle +est fréquemment contournée ; les mécanismes électoraux se perpétuent, +mais ils échouent souvent à peser sur les déterminations majeures ; les +figures institutionnelles traditionnelles persistent, mais elles ne sont +plus toujours les lieux effectifs de production, de justification et de +révision des normes. Ce déphasage — structurel, et non conjoncturel — ne signifie pas la disparition du politique, mais la transformation +de ses modes de régulation. -Mais cette crise des catégories héritées n’est pas une vacance. Elle signale au contraire l’émergence de formes de régulation dont les prises réelles se redistribuent selon des logiques techno-fonctionnelles, administratives, protocolaires ou computationnelles. Ce ne sont pas des formes qu’il faut appeler archicratiques au sens fort, dès lors qu’elles tendent précisément à soustraire la régulation à la scène d’épreuve ; elles relèvent plutôt de dynamiques de désarchicration, d’archicratistique, ou, lorsqu’elles se referment durablement sur leur propre logique d’exécution, de dérives autarchicratiques. +À cette crise de la souveraineté s'ajoute l'épuisement des grilles de +lecture fondées sur le sujet autonome, contractuel et rationnel, figure +centrale de la philosophie politique moderne. La fiction du +citoyen-individu, maître de lui-même, capable d'entrer en délibération +avec autrui et de participer à une volonté générale informée, n'a plus +de prise suffisante sur des architectures décisionnelles automatisées, +sur des normes codifiées par délégation, sur des processus +algorithmiques opérant à distance ou sans concertation réelle. Le sujet +y est souvent affecté avant même d'avoir été informé ; inclus sans être +consulté ; contraint sans pouvoir formuler un désaccord effectivement +opposable. La subjectivité politique classique se trouve ainsi +contournée par des formats de décision qui n'appellent plus +nécessairement ni la volonté, ni la délibération, ni même la conscience +explicite des sujets affectés. -Ce que nous voyons proliférer, ce sont des régulations discrètes, réparties, non centralisées, opérant par la norme, le calcul, la procédure, le protocole, l’interface ou le flux : décisions à fondement peu visible, à justification faible, à énonciateur diffus, qui se donnent comme évidences procédurales, injonctions techniques ou impératifs statistiques. L’ordre n’y est plus principalement commandé ; il est implémenté. Il ne se fonde plus toujours dans une loi explicitement débattue ; il s’inscrit dans des chaînes opératoires, des standards, des métriques, des architectures logicielles et des agencements institutionnels partiellement soustraits à l’épreuve. +Mais cette crise des catégories héritées n'est pas une vacance. Elle +signale au contraire l'émergence de formes de régulation dont les prises +réelles se redistribuent selon des logiques techno-fonctionnelles, +administratives, protocolaires ou computationnelles. Ce ne sont pas des +formes qu'il faut appeler archicratiques au sens fort, dès lors qu'elles +tendent précisément à soustraire la régulation à la scène d'épreuve ; +elles relèvent plutôt de dynamiques de désarchicration, +d'archicratistique, ou, lorsqu'elles se referment durablement sur leur +propre logique d'exécution, de dérives autarchicratiques. -Cette montée autarchicratique s’observe dans la prolifération de gouvernances sans contre-pouvoir : agences indépendantes, plateformes numériques, circuits de certification, autorités administratives sans délibération parlementaire effective. Ce sont des formes de régulation qui ne sont pas nécessairement illégales, mais qui échappent progressivement à une mise en scène démocratique substantielle. Le débat n’y est pas frontalement supprimé : il est rendu inopérant. Les délais ne sont pas toujours abolis : ils deviennent insuffisants, fictifs ou impraticables. Les voies de recours ne sont pas nécessairement closes en droit : elles cessent d’être effectivement opposables. L’autarchicratie ne désigne donc pas ici un méta-régime symétrique de l’archicratie, mais la dérive par laquelle des architectures régulatrices continuent d’opérer tout en se soustrayant à la scène d’épreuve, en affaiblissant l’exposition de leurs fondements et en comprimant le politique dans l’exécution performative de leurs propres procédures. +Ce que nous voyons proliférer, ce sont des régulations discrètes, +réparties, non centralisées, opérant par la norme, le calcul, la +procédure, le protocole, l'interface ou le flux : décisions à fondement +peu visible, à justification faible, à énonciateur diffus, qui se +donnent comme évidences procédurales, injonctions techniques ou +impératifs statistiques. L'ordre n'y est plus principalement commandé ; +il est implémenté. Il ne se fonde plus toujours dans une loi +explicitement débattue ; il s'inscrit dans des chaînes opératoires, des +standards, des métriques, des architectures logicielles et des +agencements institutionnels partiellement soustraits à l'épreuve. -Mais cette prolifération n’épuise pas le champ des régulations contemporaines : elle rend d’autant plus décisif le repérage des scènes encore tenables, des médiations encore opposables et des prises susceptibles d’être réinstituées. +Cette montée autarchicratique s'observe dans la prolifération de +gouvernances sans contre-pouvoir : agences indépendantes, plateformes +numériques, circuits de certification, autorités administratives sans +délibération parlementaire effective. Ce sont des formes de régulation +qui ne sont pas nécessairement illégales, mais qui échappent +progressivement à une mise en scène démocratique substantielle. Le débat +n'y est pas frontalement supprimé : il est rendu inopérant. Les délais +ne sont pas toujours abolis : ils deviennent insuffisants, fictifs ou +impraticables. Les voies de recours ne sont pas nécessairement closes en +droit : elles cessent d'être effectivement opposables. L'autarchicratie +ne désigne donc pas ici un méta-régime symétrique de l'archicratie, mais +la dérive par laquelle des architectures régulatrices continuent +d'opérer tout en se soustrayant à la scène d'épreuve, en affaiblissant +l'exposition de leurs fondements et en comprimant le politique dans +l'exécution performative de leurs propres procédures. -Dès lors, ce que ce chapitre propose, ce n’est pas de rebaptiser “archicratie” la non-scène contemporaine, mais de construire un paradigme capable de la diagnostiquer. Le paradigme archicratique n’est pas un paradigme de la non-scène ; il est une grammaire critique permettant de repérer les conditions sous lesquelles une régulation devient fondée, opérante et révisable — ou, au contraire, dérive vers l’opacité, l’indisputabilité et la fermeture autarchicratique. Il ne vise donc pas à célébrer une mutation silencieuse du pouvoir, mais à rendre visibles, pensables et opposables les écarts entre une régulation pleinement archicratique, articulant arcalité, cratialité et archicration, et des dispositifs qui, tout en continuant d’opérer, se soustraient à la scène de leur propre épreuve. C’est à cette condition qu’un tel paradigme peut prétendre à une véritable portée diagnostique, critique et politique. +Mais cette prolifération n'épuise pas le champ des régulations +contemporaines : elle rend d'autant plus décisif le repérage des scènes +encore tenables, des médiations encore opposables et des prises +susceptibles d'être réinstituées. -Or, pour être valide, un tel paradigme doit être opposable. Il doit permettre de formuler un diagnostic vérifiable, contestable, falsifiable, reproductible, à partir d’objets de repérage identifiables : scènes neutralisées, mimées ou relocalisées hors d’atteinte ; fondements opacifiés, euphémisés ou difficilement exposables ; délais comprimés, fictifs ou pratiquement supprimés ; procédures automatiques ; figures d’intercession techniques. Il doit nommer des configurations typiques : des régimes où tout semble fonctionnel, mais où plus rien ne peut véritablement être remis en cause. Il doit enfin permettre une lecture différenciée du réel, et non une généralisation rhétorique. C’est à cette condition — à la fois théorique, épistémique et politique — que le paradigme archicratique peut s’imposer comme une nouvelle grammaire critique de la régulation contemporaine. +Dès lors, ce que ce chapitre propose, ce n'est pas de rebaptiser +"archicratie" la non-scène contemporaine, mais de construire un +paradigme capable de la diagnostiquer. Le paradigme archicratique n'est +pas un paradigme de la non-scène ; il est une grammaire critique +permettant de repérer les conditions sous lesquelles une régulation +devient fondée, opérante et révisable — ou, au contraire, dérive vers +l'opacité, l'indisputabilité et la fermeture autarchicratique. Il ne +vise donc pas à célébrer une mutation silencieuse du pouvoir, mais à +rendre visibles, pensables et opposables les écarts entre une régulation +pleinement archicratique, articulant arcalité, cratialité et +archicration, et des dispositifs qui, tout en continuant d'opérer, se +soustraient à la scène de leur propre épreuve. C'est à cette condition +qu'un tel paradigme peut prétendre à une véritable portée diagnostique, +critique et politique. -La crise sanitaire du COVID-19, à cet égard, a constitué une épreuve paradigmatique : décisions exceptionnelles prises en Conseil de défense, sans publication des débats, avec des délais comprimés et un contradictoire fortement réduit ; régulations sociales massives imposées par décret, par indicateurs, par plateformes ; gouvernance par courbe épidémique, avec des justifications largement internalisées dans la logique de l’anticipation sanitaire. Dans ce moment extrême, le paradigme archicratique a révélé sa capacité à lire ce que les catégories classiques ne permettaient plus d’interpréter. De même, dans la gouvernance algorithmique des aides sociales, dans la notation automatique des élèves ou dans la gestion budgétaire par règles européennes automatiques, nous observons des dispositifs où la régulation opère à travers des chaînes de décision faiblement visibles, à scène d’épreuve comprimée ou relocalisée, et à fondements difficilement exposables pour ceux qu’ils affectent. Ce n’est pas la fin du politique ; c’est l’une des formes contemporaines de sa mutation silencieuse. Et c’est cette mutation que le paradigme archicratique nous permet de penser, de cartographier et de critiquer — à condition qu’il se dote d’une architecture rigoureuse, d’une typologie opératoire, d’une exigence de validation et d’un langage partagé. +Or, pour être valide, un tel paradigme doit être opposable. Il doit +permettre de formuler un diagnostic vérifiable, contestable, +falsifiable, reproductible, à partir d'objets de repérage identifiables +: scènes neutralisées, mimées ou relocalisées hors d'atteinte ; +fondements opacifiés, euphémisés ou difficilement exposables ; délais +comprimés, fictifs ou pratiquement supprimés ; procédures automatiques ; +figures d'intercession techniques. Il doit nommer des configurations +typiques : des régimes où tout semble fonctionnel, mais où plus rien ne +peut véritablement être remis en cause. Il doit enfin permettre une +lecture différenciée du réel, et non une généralisation rhétorique. +C'est à cette condition — à la fois théorique, épistémique et +politique — que le paradigme archicratique peut s'imposer comme une +nouvelle grammaire critique de la régulation contemporaine. -## 1.1 — Hypothèse fondatrice : L’archicratie comme paradigme triadique de régulation +La crise sanitaire du COVID-19, à cet égard, a constitué une épreuve +paradigmatique : décisions exceptionnelles prises en Conseil de défense, +sans publication des débats, avec des délais comprimés et un +contradictoire fortement réduit ; régulations sociales massives imposées +par décret, par indicateurs, par plateformes ; gouvernance par courbe +épidémique, avec des justifications largement internalisées dans la +logique de l'anticipation sanitaire. Dans ce moment extrême, le +paradigme archicratique a révélé sa capacité à lire ce que les +catégories classiques ne permettaient plus d'interpréter. De même, dans +la gouvernance algorithmique des aides sociales, dans la notation +automatique des élèves ou dans la gestion budgétaire par règles +européennes automatiques, nous observons des dispositifs où la +régulation opère à travers des chaînes de décision faiblement visibles, +à scène d'épreuve comprimée ou relocalisée, et à fondements +difficilement exposables pour ceux qu'ils affectent. Ce n'est pas la fin +du politique ; c'est l'une des formes contemporaines de sa mutation +silencieuse. Et c'est cette mutation que le paradigme archicratique nous +permet de penser, de cartographier et de critiquer — à condition qu'il +se dote d'une architecture rigoureuse, d'une typologie opératoire, d'une +exigence de validation et d'un langage partagé. -Si toute société humaine connaît des formes d’organisation, toute société politique, en revanche, ne devient pensable comme telle qu’à partir du moment où elle institue non seulement des ordres, mais des épreuves de l’ordre. Il ne suffit pas qu’un ordre fonctionne pour être légitime ; il faut qu’il soit soutenu par un fondement déclarable, une force opérante et une scène de dispute. Ce trépied invisible — dont l’oubli ou la dissociation produit la dérive — constitue le socle conceptuel du paradigme archicratique. Il ne s’agit pas ici d’additionner des dimensions empiriques hétérogènes. Notre hypothèse fondatrice est la suivante : toute régulation politiquement viable, dès lors qu’elle demeure discernable, contestable et transmissible, suppose l’articulation de trois registres distincts mais indissociables. C’est cette *structure tripolaire* que nous proposons de désigner comme l’ossature régulatoire de l’archicratie. +## 1.1 — Hypothèse fondatrice : L'archicratie comme paradigme triadique de régulation -Le premier pôle est celui de *l’arcalité*. Celle-ci n’est ni une simple légitimation externe, ni une justification rhétorique. Elle désigne la source fondatrice d’un ordre régulateur : ce qui l’installe, ce qui le rend recevable, ce qui l’inscrit dans un horizon de validité. L’arcalité peut être juridique (texte fondateur, norme constitutionnelle), symbolique (mythe, rite, idéal), scientifique (protocole, indicateur), sacrée (divinité, transcendance), ou historique (héritage, mémoire collective). Elle est ce par quoi une régulation se donne une origine et une finalité, ce qui lui confère sa prétention à exister *comme norme*, et non simplement comme fait. L’arcalité est donc toujours invocation : elle articule le passé fondateur à l’avenir projeté, dans une tension qui légitime l’action présente. +Si toute société humaine connaît des formes d'organisation, toute +société politique, en revanche, ne devient pensable comme telle qu'à +partir du moment où elle institue non seulement des ordres, mais des +épreuves de l'ordre. Il ne suffit pas qu'un ordre fonctionne pour être +légitime ; il faut qu'il soit soutenu par un fondement déclarable, une +force opérante et une scène de dispute. Ce trépied invisible — dont +l'oubli ou la dissociation produit la dérive — constitue le socle +conceptuel du paradigme archicratique. Il ne s'agit pas ici +d'additionner des dimensions empiriques hétérogènes. Notre hypothèse +fondatrice est la suivante : toute régulation politiquement viable, dès +lors qu'elle demeure discernable, contestable et transmissible, suppose +l'articulation de trois registres distincts mais indissociables. C'est +cette *structure tripolaire* que nous proposons de désigner comme +l'ossature régulatoire de l'archicratie. -Le second pôle est celui de *la cratialité*. La cratialité désigne la capacité effective d’un dispositif à produire des effets dans le monde : son opérativité, sa puissance d’action, sa capacité à structurer, à contraindre, à transformer. Elle inclut les infrastructures matérielles (bâtiments, réseaux, plateformes), les dispositifs techniques (logiciels, bases de données, interfaces), les procédures (circulaires, décrets, codifications), les corps organisés (administrations, directions, opérateurs), ainsi que les flux (budgétaires, logistiques, cognitifs) qui permettent à la régulation de s’effectuer. La cratialité n’est pas nécessairement visible, mais elle est toujours active. Elle est la force sans laquelle la norme reste lettre morte, la capacité sans laquelle le fondement demeure incantation. C’est la force de transformation, mais aussi, potentiellement, celle de capture, de verrouillage ou d’effacement de la scène politique. +Le premier pôle est celui de *l'arcalité*. Celle-ci n'est ni une simple +légitimation externe, ni une justification rhétorique. Elle désigne la +source fondatrice d'un ordre régulateur : ce qui l'installe, ce qui le +rend recevable, ce qui l'inscrit dans un horizon de validité. L'arcalité +peut être juridique (texte fondateur, norme constitutionnelle), +symbolique (mythe, rite, idéal), scientifique (protocole, indicateur), +sacrée (divinité, transcendance), ou historique (héritage, mémoire +collective). Elle est ce par quoi une régulation se donne une origine et +une finalité, ce qui lui confère sa prétention à exister *comme norme*, +et non simplement comme fait. L'arcalité est donc toujours invocation : +elle articule le passé fondateur à l'avenir projeté, dans une tension +qui légitime l'action présente. -Le troisième pôle, enfin, est celui de *l’archicration*. Ce néologisme désigne la capacité d’un ordre à se rendre *disputable* : c’est-à-dire à instituer une scène, un moment, un dispositif, où l’ordre peut être mis en épreuve, critiqué, reformulé, contesté, amendé. L’archicration est ce qui rend le pouvoir *opposable*, non dans un sens antagonique, mais dans un sens procédural, différé, dialogique. Elle prend la forme d’un contradictoire institué, d’un recours possible, d’un délai interprétatif, d’un droit de parole, d’un espace de reconfiguration. Là où l’arcalité fonde et où la cratialité opère, l’archicration met à l’épreuve — et c’est par cette mise à l’épreuve qu’elle garantit la viabilité politique du dispositif. +Le second pôle est celui de *la cratialité*. La cratialité désigne la +capacité effective d'un dispositif à produire des effets dans le monde : +son opérativité, sa puissance d'action, sa capacité à structurer, à +contraindre, à transformer. Elle inclut les infrastructures matérielles +(bâtiments, réseaux, plateformes), les dispositifs techniques +(logiciels, bases de données, interfaces), les procédures (circulaires, +décrets, codifications), les corps organisés (administrations, +directions, opérateurs), ainsi que les flux (budgétaires, logistiques, +cognitifs) qui permettent à la régulation de s'effectuer. La cratialité +n'est pas nécessairement visible, mais elle est toujours active. Elle +est la force sans laquelle la norme reste lettre morte, la capacité sans +laquelle le fondement demeure incantation. C'est la force de +transformation, mais aussi, potentiellement, celle de capture, de +verrouillage ou d'effacement de la scène politique. -La force heuristique du paradigme archicratique ne tient donc pas à la simple distinction de ces trois pôles, mais à la discipline de lecture qu’impose leur articulation. Toute enquête doit reconstruire ce qui, dans un dispositif donné, se donne comme fondement, ce qui y opère effectivement, et ce qui rend cette opération contestable, révisable ou opposable. Une scène peut être déclarée sans être praticable ; une opération peut être puissante sans être fondée de manière exposable ; un fondement peut être invoqué sans traverser les chaînes réelles d’effectuation. Le paradigme n’a de fécondité qu’à la condition de maintenir cette triple vigilance. +Le troisième pôle, enfin, est celui de *l'archicration*. Ce néologisme +désigne la capacité d'un ordre à se rendre *disputable* : c'est-à-dire à +instituer une scène, un moment, un dispositif, où l'ordre peut être mis +en épreuve, critiqué, reformulé, contesté, amendé. L'archicration est ce +qui rend le pouvoir *opposable*, non dans un sens antagonique, mais dans +un sens procédural, différé, dialogique. Elle prend la forme d'un +contradictoire institué, d'un recours possible, d'un délai +interprétatif, d'un droit de parole, d'un espace de reconfiguration. Là +où l'arcalité fonde et où la cratialité opère, l'archicration met à +l'épreuve — et c'est par cette mise à l'épreuve qu'elle garantit la +viabilité politique du dispositif. -Encore faut-il préciser sous quelle discipline minimale cette triade devient opératoire. -L’hypothèse archicratique n’a de portée qu’à la condition d’être mobilisable comme protocole de lecture. Devant tout dispositif de régulation, l’enquête doit ainsi poser au moins quatre questions élémentaires. Premièrement : qu’est-ce qui, ici, fonde et se présente comme recevable — texte, doctrine, récit, norme, expertise, tradition, indicateur ? Deuxièmement : qu’est-ce qui, ici, opère effectivement — chaîne procédurale, infrastructure, hiérarchie, interface, instrument, protocole, calcul, corps professionnel ? Troisièmement : où, comment et selon quels délais ce qui fonde et ce qui opère peuvent-ils être exposés à une épreuve, à une contradiction, à une révision ? Quatrièmement : cette épreuve est-elle praticable, ou seulement figurée ? +La force heuristique du paradigme archicratique ne tient donc pas à la +simple distinction de ces trois pôles, mais à la discipline de lecture +qu'impose leur articulation. Toute enquête doit reconstruire ce qui, +dans un dispositif donné, se donne comme fondement, ce qui y opère +effectivement, et ce qui rend cette opération contestable, révisable ou +opposable. Une scène peut être déclarée sans être praticable ; une +opération peut être puissante sans être fondée de manière exposable ; un +fondement peut être invoqué sans traverser les chaînes réelles +d'effectuation. Le paradigme n'a de fécondité qu'à la condition de +maintenir cette triple vigilance. -Ce mini-protocole a une fonction simple : empêcher que l’analyse se satisfasse soit des déclarations de principe, soit des seules performances d’exécution, soit encore des mises en scène procédurales de la contestation. Il oblige à suivre la régulation dans ses trois prises irréductibles, puis à examiner la manière dont elles s’articulent, se disjoignent, se neutralisent ou se soutiennent. Une scène peut être déclarée sans être effective ; une opération peut être puissante sans être fondée de manière exposable ; un fondement peut être proclamé sans traverser les chaînes réelles d’effectuation. C’est à cette condition que le paradigme conserve sa fécondité. +Encore faut-il préciser sous quelle discipline minimale cette triade +devient opératoire.\ +L'hypothèse archicratique n'a de portée qu'à la condition d'être +mobilisable comme protocole de lecture. Devant tout dispositif de +régulation, l'enquête doit ainsi poser au moins quatre questions +élémentaires. Premièrement : qu'est-ce qui, ici, fonde et se présente +comme recevable — texte, doctrine, récit, norme, expertise, tradition, +indicateur ? Deuxièmement : qu'est-ce qui, ici, opère effectivement — chaîne procédurale, infrastructure, hiérarchie, interface, instrument, +protocole, calcul, corps professionnel ? Troisièmement : où, comment et +selon quels délais ce qui fonde et ce qui opère peuvent-ils être exposés +à une épreuve, à une contradiction, à une révision ? Quatrièmement : +cette épreuve est-elle praticable, ou seulement figurée ? -Il en résulte une exigence de méthode. Lire archicratiquement un dispositif ne revient ni à lui plaquer un schéma, ni à distribuer des labels. Cela consiste à reconstruire, pour chaque cas, l’économie concrète de ses appuis : où se loge l’arcalité, par quoi passe la cratialité, dans quelle scène — si scène il y a — l’archicration peut encore se tenir. C’est à partir de cette discipline minimale de lecture que les trois pôles peuvent maintenant être définis avec toute la rigueur requise. +Ce mini-protocole a une fonction simple : empêcher que l'analyse se +satisfasse soit des déclarations de principe, soit des seules +performances d'exécution, soit encore des mises en scène procédurales de +la contestation. Il oblige à suivre la régulation dans ses trois prises +irréductibles, puis à examiner la manière dont elles s'articulent, se +disjoignent, se neutralisent ou se soutiennent. Une scène peut être +déclarée sans être effective ; une opération peut être puissante sans +être fondée de manière exposable ; un fondement peut être proclamé sans +traverser les chaînes réelles d'effectuation. C'est à cette condition +que le paradigme conserve sa fécondité. + +Il en résulte une exigence de méthode. Lire archicratiquement un +dispositif ne revient ni à lui plaquer un schéma, ni à distribuer des +labels. Cela consiste à reconstruire, pour chaque cas, l'économie +concrète de ses appuis : où se loge l'arcalité, par quoi passe la +cratialité, dans quelle scène — si scène il y a — l'archicration +peut encore se tenir. C'est à partir de cette discipline minimale de +lecture que les trois pôles peuvent maintenant être définis avec toute +la rigueur requise. ### 1.1.1 — Définition rigoureuse des trois pôles -Si l’on veut que le paradigme archicratique soit plus qu’une abstraction spéculative ou une métaphore critique, il faut impérativement que ses trois composantes cardinales soient non seulement définies avec rigueur, mais également rendues identifiables, documentables, opératoires. Le triptyque *arcalité–cratialité–archicration* ne saurait fonctionner comme un schéma décoratif ou une trinité conceptuelle flottante. Chacun de ces pôles doit être saisi comme une dimension *irréductible* de tout dispositif de régulation — un seuil constitutif dont l’absence invalide la scène politique, dont le déséquilibre produit des pathologies, et dont l’articulation conditionne la viabilité d’un ordre. Ce que nous allons entreprendre ici, c’est donc une triple opération : une *définition théorique fondée*, une *détection empirique possible*, et une *justification politique nécessaire* de ces trois piliers. +Si l'on veut que le paradigme archicratique soit plus qu'une abstraction +spéculative ou une métaphore critique, il faut impérativement que ses +trois composantes cardinales soient non seulement définies avec rigueur, +mais également rendues identifiables, documentables, opératoires. Le +triptyque *arcalité–cratialité–archicration* ne saurait fonctionner +comme un schéma décoratif ou une trinité conceptuelle flottante. Chacun +de ces pôles doit être saisi comme une dimension *irréductible* de tout +dispositif de régulation — un seuil constitutif dont l'absence +invalide la scène politique, dont le déséquilibre produit des +pathologies, et dont l'articulation conditionne la viabilité d'un ordre. +Ce que nous allons entreprendre ici, c'est donc une triple opération : +une *définition théorique fondée*, une *détection empirique possible*, +et une *justification politique nécessaire* de ces trois piliers. -#### **L’*arcalité* : ce qui fonde, légitime, invoque, institue** +#### **L'*arcalité* : ce qui fonde, légitime, invoque, institue** -L’*arcalité* constitue le premier pôle du paradigme archicratique, et probablement son socle le plus difficile à cerner, tant elle opère à la fois comme fondation instituante, justification régulatrice et horizon de légitimation. Toute régulation, pour être recevable, acceptable ou même simplement durable, suppose en effet un principe d’*arcalité*, c’est-à-dire une forme de *prise* fondatrice qui précède, encadre ou structure l’effectuation concrète d’un ordre. Sans *arcalité*, pas d’adhésion possible, pas de stabilité cohérente, pas même de contestation intelligible. Elle est ce qui rend possible la reconnaissance, qu’elle soit volontaire, tacite, imposée ou mimée. +L'*arcalité* constitue le premier pôle du paradigme archicratique, et +probablement son socle le plus difficile à cerner, tant elle opère à la +fois comme fondation instituante, justification régulatrice et horizon +de légitimation. Toute régulation, pour être recevable, acceptable ou +même simplement durable, suppose en effet un principe d'*arcalité*, +c'est-à-dire une forme de *prise* fondatrice qui précède, encadre ou +structure l'effectuation concrète d'un ordre. Sans *arcalité*, pas +d'adhésion possible, pas de stabilité cohérente, pas même de +contestation intelligible. Elle est ce qui rend possible la +reconnaissance, qu'elle soit volontaire, tacite, imposée ou mimée. -Mais l’*arcalité* ne se confond ni avec l’autorité, ni avec la souveraineté, ni même avec la source du droit. Elle est plus diffuse, plus profonde, parfois presque silencieuse. Elle ne repose pas nécessairement sur un texte sacré ou une institution solennelle. Elle peut tenir dans un récit partagé, dans un protocole symbolique, dans une logique immanente ou dans une mythologie diffuse. Elle opère souvent sans être nommée. C’est précisément ce qui la rend à la fois puissante et périlleuse : sa naturalisation tend à dissimuler sa construction, à faire passer l’édifice pour l’origine. +Mais l'*arcalité* ne se confond ni avec l'autorité, ni avec la +souveraineté, ni même avec la source du droit. Elle est plus diffuse, +plus profonde, parfois presque silencieuse. Elle ne repose pas +nécessairement sur un texte sacré ou une institution solennelle. Elle +peut tenir dans un récit partagé, dans un protocole symbolique, dans une +logique immanente ou dans une mythologie diffuse. Elle opère souvent +sans être nommée. C'est précisément ce qui la rend à la fois puissante +et périlleuse : sa naturalisation tend à dissimuler sa construction, à +faire passer l'édifice pour l'origine. -Ces formes tacites ne valent comme arcalité interne que lorsqu’elles orientent effectivement la recevabilité d’un ordre, sa transmission et les conditions sous lesquelles il peut être contesté ; à défaut, elles relèvent d’un simple habitus de coordination et non d’un véritable fondement régulateur. +Ces formes tacites ne valent comme arcalité interne que lorsqu'elles +orientent effectivement la recevabilité d'un ordre, sa transmission et +les conditions sous lesquelles il peut être contesté ; à défaut, elles +relèvent d'un simple habitus de coordination et non d'un véritable +fondement régulateur. -Dans l’histoire politique, les formes d’*arcalité* ont été multiples : la monarchie de droit divin reposait sur une *arcalité* sacrée ; les constitutions républicaines sur une *arcalité* contractuelle ou humaniste ; les empires coloniaux sur une *arcalité* raciale ou civilisatrice ; les régimes technocratiques contemporains sur une *arcalité* de compétence ou de rationalité instrumentale. Mais ces formes ne sont pas mutuellement exclusives. Un même ordre peut mobiliser plusieurs sources d’*arcalité* simultanées — parfois convergentes, parfois contradictoires. C’est dans cette pluralité que se nouent les tensions fondamentales de la régulation contemporaine. +Dans l'histoire politique, les formes d'*arcalité* ont été multiples : +la monarchie de droit divin reposait sur une *arcalité* sacrée ; les +constitutions républicaines sur une *arcalité* contractuelle ou +humaniste ; les empires coloniaux sur une *arcalité* raciale ou +civilisatrice ; les régimes technocratiques contemporains sur une +*arcalité* de compétence ou de rationalité instrumentale. Mais ces +formes ne sont pas mutuellement exclusives. Un même ordre peut mobiliser +plusieurs sources d'*arcalité* simultanées — parfois convergentes, +parfois contradictoires. C'est dans cette pluralité que se nouent les +tensions fondamentales de la régulation contemporaine. -Il faut donc affirmer clairement : *l’arcalité n’est jamais une abstraction métaphysique*. Elle se donne toujours à voir — ou à déduire — par des objets concrets, des textes, des procédures, des figures, des lieux. Elle peut se manifester sous forme de *chartes*, de *préambules*, de *récits fondateurs*, de *rites d’investiture*, de *serments collectifs*, de *mythes institutionnalisés*, ou encore de *grilles doctrinales*. Ces formes sont les signes métonymiques de l’arcalité. Elles ne l’épuisent pas, mais en signalent la présence. +Il faut donc affirmer clairement : *l'arcalité n'est jamais une +abstraction métaphysique*. Elle se donne toujours à voir — ou à +déduire — par des objets concrets, des textes, des procédures, des +figures, des lieux. Elle peut se manifester sous forme de *chartes*, de +*préambules*, de *récits fondateurs*, de *rites d'investiture*, de +*serments collectifs*, de *mythes institutionnalisés*, ou encore de +*grilles doctrinales*. Ces formes sont les signes métonymiques de +l'arcalité. Elles ne l'épuisent pas, mais en signalent la présence. -Cependant, pour une lecture critique, il ne suffit pas de constater leur existence. Il faut encore savoir *où*, *comment*, *par qui*, *avec quels effets* l’arcalité est invoquée, maintenue, reproduite ou déclinée. C’est pourquoi l’analyse archicratique exige une grammaire plus fine : l’arcalité peut être interne — lorsqu’elle est produite, soutenue ou référée *par* le dispositif qu’elle régule (comme une éthique professionnelle propre, une constitution interne, une doctrine auto-référentielle) ; ou externe — lorsqu’elle est importée, projetée ou surplombante (comme un traité international, un standard global, une norme transculturelle). Ces deux modalités ne sont pas exclusives. Elles coexistent souvent, mais selon des agencements très différents selon les régimes. +Cependant, pour une lecture critique, il ne suffit pas de constater leur +existence. Il faut encore savoir *où*, *comment*, *par qui*, *avec quels +effets* l'arcalité est invoquée, maintenue, reproduite ou déclinée. +C'est pourquoi l'analyse archicratique exige une grammaire plus fine : +l'arcalité peut être interne — lorsqu'elle est produite, soutenue ou +référée *par* le dispositif qu'elle régule (comme une éthique +professionnelle propre, une constitution interne, une doctrine +auto-référentielle) ; ou externe — lorsqu'elle est importée, projetée +ou surplombante (comme un traité international, un standard global, une +norme transculturelle). Ces deux modalités ne sont pas exclusives. Elles +coexistent souvent, mais selon des agencements très différents selon les +régimes. -De plus, l’arcalité peut s’ancrer dans des dimensions multiples — politiques, sociales, symboliques, biologiques, technologiques, épistémiques — qu’il conviendra d’analyser rigoureusement. Un même objet peut combiner plusieurs de ces strates. Par exemple, une Constitution n’est pas seulement un texte juridique : elle est un récit, une trace historique, un dispositif de légitimation, une invocation rituelle, un cadre symbolique. Elle mobilise l’arcalité à tous ces niveaux, et c’est dans cette multidimensionnalité que réside sa force — ou sa fragilité. +De plus, l'arcalité peut s'ancrer dans des dimensions multiples — politiques, sociales, symboliques, biologiques, technologiques, +épistémiques — qu'il conviendra d'analyser rigoureusement. Un même +objet peut combiner plusieurs de ces strates. Par exemple, une +Constitution n'est pas seulement un texte juridique : elle est un récit, +une trace historique, un dispositif de légitimation, une invocation +rituelle, un cadre symbolique. Elle mobilise l'arcalité à tous ces +niveaux, et c'est dans cette multidimensionnalité que réside sa force — ou sa fragilité. -Enfin, et c’est une exigence essentielle du paradigme archicratique : l’arcalité doit pouvoir être repérée, évaluée, contestée. Autrement dit, elle doit être *opposable*. Il ne s’agit pas d’accepter les fondements comme donnés, mais de construire les outils pour en identifier les signes, en questionner les conditions de possibilité, en analyser les effets. Cela suppose de déployer une typologie catégorielle des arcalités selon leur nature (politique, sociale, psychologique, technologique…), leur position (interne/externe), leurs objets de manifestation (textes, symboles, rites, doctrines…), leurs indicateurs de stabilité ou de mutation (persistance, fréquence, autorité reconnue…), et leur degré d’opposabilité réelle (peut-on les discuter, les modifier, les interpréter autrement ?). +Enfin, et c'est une exigence essentielle du paradigme archicratique : +l'arcalité doit pouvoir être repérée, évaluée, contestée. Autrement dit, +elle doit être *opposable*. Il ne s'agit pas d'accepter les fondements +comme donnés, mais de construire les outils pour en identifier les +signes, en questionner les conditions de possibilité, en analyser les +effets. Cela suppose de déployer une typologie catégorielle des +arcalités selon leur nature (politique, sociale, psychologique, +technologique...), leur position (interne/externe), leurs objets de +manifestation (textes, symboles, rites, doctrines...), leurs indicateurs +de stabilité ou de mutation (persistance, fréquence, autorité +reconnue...), et leur degré d'opposabilité réelle (peut-on les discuter, +les modifier, les interpréter autrement ?). -Cette exigence de formalisation critique rappelle simplement qu’aucune arcalité n’est politiquement innocente. Toute régulation présuppose un fondement, toute arcalité laisse des traces, et toute trace peut être interrogée quant à sa source, sa fonction, ses effets et ses conditions d’opposabilité. +Cette exigence de formalisation critique rappelle simplement qu'aucune +arcalité n'est politiquement innocente. Toute régulation présuppose un +fondement, toute arcalité laisse des traces, et toute trace peut être +interrogée quant à sa source, sa fonction, ses effets et ses conditions +d'opposabilité. -C’est dans cette possibilité même de visibilisation, de mise en tension et de mise à l’épreuve que l’arcalité quitte le domaine de la transcendance pour entrer dans celui de l’analyse politique. Le paradigme archicratique en fait un des trois piliers fondamentaux — non pour l’absolutiser, mais pour en penser la structure, la diversité, les effets et les conditions de contestation. +C'est dans cette possibilité même de visibilisation, de mise en tension +et de mise à l'épreuve que l'arcalité quitte le domaine de la +transcendance pour entrer dans celui de l'analyse politique. Le +paradigme archicratique en fait un des trois piliers fondamentaux — non pour l'absolutiser, mais pour en penser la structure, la diversité, +les effets et les conditions de contestation. #### **La *cratialité* : ce qui opère, contraint, transforme, régule** -La *cratialité* est le second pôle du paradigme archicratique, et peut-être celui qui se donne le plus immédiatement à voir, car il engage la matérialité active, l’effectuation pratique, la dynamique opératoire de tout dispositif de régulation. Si l’*arcalité* dit *pourquoi* une régulation tient, la *cratialité* dit *comment* elle opère, *par quoi* elle se propage, *au moyen de quelles forces* elle agit. C’est la dimension du faire, du forcer, du transformer. Elle ne suppose pas forcément la violence, mais elle implique toujours une prise, une structure, une chaîne d’exécution, un vecteur d’opération. Elle est ce qui rend la régulation active, efficace, réelle — ou, à l’inverse, inertielle, obsolète ou saturée. +La *cratialité* est le second pôle du paradigme archicratique, et +peut-être celui qui se donne le plus immédiatement à voir, car il engage +la matérialité active, l'effectuation pratique, la dynamique opératoire +de tout dispositif de régulation. Si l'*arcalité* dit *pourquoi* une +régulation tient, la *cratialité* dit *comment* elle opère, *par quoi* +elle se propage, *au moyen de quelles forces* elle agit. C'est la +dimension du faire, du forcer, du transformer. Elle ne suppose pas +forcément la violence, mais elle implique toujours une prise, une +structure, une chaîne d'exécution, un vecteur d'opération. Elle est ce +qui rend la régulation active, efficace, réelle — ou, à l'inverse, +inertielle, obsolète ou saturée. -*Le terme de cratialité dérive ici du radical grec kratos* (le pouvoir comme domination ou capacité d’emprise), à la différence de *archè* (le pouvoir comme commencement, fondement ou principe). La *cratialité* désigne donc la puissance opératoire d’un ordre : sa capacité à s’incarner dans des instruments, des circuits, des corps, des dispositifs techniques ou organisationnels. Elle est la mise en œuvre — mais aussi, bien souvent, la mise en contrainte. +*Le terme de cratialité dérive ici du radical grec kratos* (le pouvoir +comme domination ou capacité d'emprise), à la différence de *archè* (le +pouvoir comme commencement, fondement ou principe). La *cratialité* +désigne donc la puissance opératoire d'un ordre : sa capacité à +s'incarner dans des instruments, des circuits, des corps, des +dispositifs techniques ou organisationnels. Elle est la mise en œuvre — mais aussi, bien souvent, la mise en contrainte. -Dans les régimes politiques classiques, on identifie la *cratialité* à l’exécutif : ministère, force publique, budget, bras armé. Mais cette lecture est à la fois trop réductrice et historiquement datée. La *cratialité* contemporaine excède largement les figures classiques du pouvoir d’État. Elle s’incarne dans des *algorithmes*, des *tableaux de bord*, des *logiciels d’évaluation*, des *systèmes de logistique globale*, des *normes ISO*, des *actes administratifs unilatéraux*, des *marchés publics automatisés*, des *protocoles cryptés*, des *formulaires numériques inaccessibles*. Elle peut être discrète, discrétionnaire, distribuée, voire disséminée jusqu’à devenir opaque. Mais elle est toujours active : elle fait advenir un effet de régulation. +Dans les régimes politiques classiques, on identifie la *cratialité* à +l'exécutif : ministère, force publique, budget, bras armé. Mais cette +lecture est à la fois trop réductrice et historiquement datée. La +*cratialité* contemporaine excède largement les figures classiques du +pouvoir d'État. Elle s'incarne dans des *algorithmes*, des *tableaux de +bord*, des *logiciels d'évaluation*, des *systèmes de logistique +globale*, des *normes ISO*, des *actes administratifs unilatéraux*, des +*marchés publics automatisés*, des *protocoles cryptés*, des +*formulaires numériques inaccessibles*. Elle peut être discrète, +discrétionnaire, distribuée, voire disséminée jusqu'à devenir opaque. +Mais elle est toujours active : elle fait advenir un effet de +régulation. -C’est pourquoi la *cratialité* ne saurait être conçue comme un simple rouage intermédiaire entre la fondation (*arcalité*) et la révision (*archicration*). Elle n’est ni instrument, ni exécution pure. Elle possède sa logique propre, ses effets d’autonomisation, ses inerties internes, ses formes d’expansion ou de court-circuit. Elle peut fonctionner comme si elle n’avait plus à répondre explicitement de ses justifications — c’est le cas des algorithmes non documentés — et comme si la scène d’épreuve n’avait plus de prise effective sur son cours ordinaire — c’est le cas des procédures automatiques rendues pratiquement non opposables. C’est en cela qu’elle constitue l’un des points névralgiques du basculement archicratique : là où la *cratialité* devient *indépendante*, *autosuffisante*, *désarrimée*, elle cesse d’être un vecteur de régulation pour devenir un vecteur muet de domination. +C'est pourquoi la *cratialité* ne saurait être conçue comme un simple +rouage intermédiaire entre la fondation (*arcalité*) et la révision +(*archicration*). Elle n'est ni instrument, ni exécution pure. Elle +possède sa logique propre, ses effets d'autonomisation, ses inerties +internes, ses formes d'expansion ou de court-circuit. Elle peut +fonctionner comme si elle n'avait plus à répondre explicitement de ses +justifications — c'est le cas des algorithmes non documentés — et +comme si la scène d'épreuve n'avait plus de prise effective sur son +cours ordinaire — c'est le cas des procédures automatiques rendues +pratiquement non opposables. C'est en cela qu'elle constitue l'un des +points névralgiques du basculement archicratique : là où la *cratialité* +devient *indépendante*, *autosuffisante*, *désarrimée*, elle cesse +d'être un vecteur de régulation pour devenir un vecteur muet de +domination. -Or, comme l’*arcalité*, la *cratialité* se donne elle aussi selon une double topologie : interne et externe. Une *cratialité* est dite *interne* lorsqu’elle repose sur les moyens d’action propres au dispositif : administration, personnels, processus décisionnels, procédures codifiées, infrastructures spécifiques. Elle est dite *externe* lorsqu’elle mobilise des ressources extérieures : cabinets de conseil, normes transnationales, plateformes numériques privées, logistiques externalisées, financements conditionnés, technologies exogènes. Ce clivage interne/externe n’est pas secondaire : il est décisif pour comprendre les asymétries de pouvoir, les dépendances structurelles, les logiques de capture. Un hôpital, par exemple, peut être cratialisé de l’intérieur par son système de codage et ses tableaux d’affectation, ou de l’extérieur par des normes budgétaires européennes ou des logiciels achetés à des firmes privées. +Or, comme l'*arcalité*, la *cratialité* se donne elle aussi selon une +double topologie : interne et externe. Une *cratialité* est dite +*interne* lorsqu'elle repose sur les moyens d'action propres au +dispositif : administration, personnels, processus décisionnels, +procédures codifiées, infrastructures spécifiques. Elle est dite +*externe* lorsqu'elle mobilise des ressources extérieures : cabinets de +conseil, normes transnationales, plateformes numériques privées, +logistiques externalisées, financements conditionnés, technologies +exogènes. Ce clivage interne/externe n'est pas secondaire : il est +décisif pour comprendre les asymétries de pouvoir, les dépendances +structurelles, les logiques de capture. Un hôpital, par exemple, peut +être cratialisé de l'intérieur par son système de codage et ses tableaux +d'affectation, ou de l'extérieur par des normes budgétaires européennes +ou des logiciels achetés à des firmes privées. -Mais au-delà de cette topologie, la *cratialité* se manifeste également selon des régimes de matérialité spécifiques, que l’on peut typologiser de manière transversale — sans pour autant déborder du registre des sciences politiques. Elle peut être politique (système d’exécution législative, coercition légale), bureaucratique (chaîne de commandement, circulation des actes), technique (infrastructure matérielle, logiciels, plateformes), symbolique (dispositifs de certification, nomenclatures, codages), économique (régulation par les incitations, budgets, subventions, sanctions monétaires), ou épistémique (production d’indicateurs, grilles d’audit, référentiels de qualité). Elle peut se concentrer dans un organe, ou être distribuée dans un réseau. +Mais au-delà de cette topologie, la *cratialité* se manifeste également +selon des régimes de matérialité spécifiques, que l'on peut typologiser +de manière transversale — sans pour autant déborder du registre des +sciences politiques. Elle peut être politique (système d'exécution +législative, coercition légale), bureaucratique (chaîne de commandement, +circulation des actes), technique (infrastructure matérielle, logiciels, +plateformes), symbolique (dispositifs de certification, nomenclatures, +codages), économique (régulation par les incitations, budgets, +subventions, sanctions monétaires), ou épistémique (production +d'indicateurs, grilles d'audit, référentiels de qualité). Elle peut se +concentrer dans un organe, ou être distribuée dans un réseau. -Chaque *cratialité* laisse des traces spécifiques, que l’analyse archicratique doit savoir lire : *organigrammes*, *circulaires*, *protocoles*, *outils numériques*, *normes d’exécution*, *rapports d’évaluation*, *structures de chaîne de valeur*. Elle est ainsi repérable, documentable, parfois contestable. Mais elle peut aussi se rendre insaisissable, lorsqu’elle s’autonomise dans la technicisation pure, dans la complexité procédurale, ou dans l’évitement politique. +Chaque *cratialité* laisse des traces spécifiques, que l'analyse +archicratique doit savoir lire : *organigrammes*, *circulaires*, +*protocoles*, *outils numériques*, *normes d'exécution*, *rapports +d'évaluation*, *structures de chaîne de valeur*. Elle est ainsi +repérable, documentable, parfois contestable. Mais elle peut aussi se +rendre insaisissable, lorsqu'elle s'autonomise dans la technicisation +pure, dans la complexité procédurale, ou dans l'évitement politique. -L’un des grands enjeux de notre paradigme est donc de réinscrire la *cratialité* dans une scène intelligible de régulation, en la rendant à la fois visible et confrontable. Cela implique de la désacraliser (toute technologie d’exécution n’est pas neutre), de la cartographier (identifier ses vecteurs réels), et de la mettre en rapport avec l’*arcalité* qui la justifie et l’*archicration* qui pourrait la contester. Car la *cratialité* seule — même parfaitement huilée — ne garantit en rien la justice, la légitimité ou la viabilité d’un dispositif. Elle peut, au contraire, devenir l’instrument d’une opacité profonde d’oppression. +L'un des grands enjeux de notre paradigme est donc de réinscrire la +*cratialité* dans une scène intelligible de régulation, en la rendant à +la fois visible et confrontable. Cela implique de la désacraliser (toute +technologie d'exécution n'est pas neutre), de la cartographier +(identifier ses vecteurs réels), et de la mettre en rapport avec +l'*arcalité* qui la justifie et l'*archicration* qui pourrait la +contester. Car la *cratialité* seule — même parfaitement huilée — ne +garantit en rien la justice, la légitimité ou la viabilité d'un +dispositif. Elle peut, au contraire, devenir l'instrument d'une opacité +profonde d'oppression. -Nous reprendrons cette cartographie formelle dans la section 1.4, où seront croisées les dimensions de c*ratialité* selon leur nature, leur vecteur, leur topologie, et leur articulation possible avec les deux autres pôles. Mais retenons déjà ceci que toute régulation opère par une *cratialité* ; toute *cratialité* suppose une structure ; et toute structure est politiquement qualifiable. +Nous reprendrons cette cartographie formelle dans la section 1.4, où +seront croisées les dimensions de c*ratialité* selon leur nature, leur +vecteur, leur topologie, et leur articulation possible avec les deux +autres pôles. Mais retenons déjà ceci que toute régulation opère par une +*cratialité* ; toute *cratialité* suppose une structure ; et toute +structure est politiquement qualifiable. -Ce n’est pas la performance qui fait la validité politique d’une cratialité, mais sa capacité à être reliée à un fondement exposable et à une scène d’épreuve praticable. Sans ces liens, elle tend à devenir une machinerie efficace, mais politiquement inassignable. C’est cette articulation — tendue, instable, mais nécessaire — qui fait de la cratialité un des points les plus critiques de la régulation contemporaine. Et c’est pourquoi elle exige d’être pensée non seulement comme un vecteur, mais comme un nœud paradigmatique à part entière. +Ce n'est pas la performance qui fait la validité politique d'une +cratialité, mais sa capacité à être reliée à un fondement exposable et à +une scène d'épreuve praticable. Sans ces liens, elle tend à devenir une +machinerie efficace, mais politiquement inassignable. C'est cette +articulation — tendue, instable, mais nécessaire — qui fait de la +cratialité un des points les plus critiques de la régulation +contemporaine. Et c'est pourquoi elle exige d'être pensée non seulement +comme un vecteur, mais comme un nœud paradigmatique à part entière. -#### **L’*archicration* : ce qui dispute, conteste, met en épreuve, arbitre** +#### **L'*archicration* : ce qui dispute, conteste, met en épreuve, arbitre** -L’archicration constitue le troisième pôle du paradigme archicratique et, à bien des égards, son point d’incandescence politique : c’est elle qui transforme une régulation en un ordre véritablement politique. Là où l’arcalité fonde et où la cratialité opère, l’archicration institue l’épreuve, ouvre la dispute, rend possible la contestation organisée, et confère à l’ordre de régulation une dimension dialogique et réflexive. Lorsqu’elle est neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante, la régulation tend à devenir une pure mécanique ; lorsqu’elle est tenue comme scène effective de reprise, elle devient une architecture habitable. +L'archicration constitue le troisième pôle du paradigme archicratique +et, à bien des égards, son point d'incandescence politique : c'est elle +qui transforme une régulation en un ordre véritablement politique. Là où +l'arcalité fonde et où la cratialité opère, l'archicration institue +l'épreuve, ouvre la dispute, rend possible la contestation organisée, et +confère à l'ordre de régulation une dimension dialogique et réflexive. +Lorsqu'elle est neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou +rendue pratiquement inopérante, la régulation tend à devenir une pure +mécanique ; lorsqu'elle est tenue comme scène effective de reprise, elle +devient une architecture habitable. -Le terme lui-même est construit à partir de *ἀρχὴ* (principe, origine, autorité) et *κρατέω* (être ou devenir le maître). Il désigne donc la capacité d’un dispositif de régulation à se rendre *opposable et amendable* dans un cadre institué : une instance, un rituel, une temporalité qui permet aux acteurs concernés de formuler, argumenter, contester, reconfigurer. C’est l’anti-mimétisme de la scène : non pas faire semblant d’écouter, mais *produire les conditions réelles* de l’écoute, du délai, du recours, de la révision. L’*archicration* n’est pas une option morale, ni un supplément d’âme procédural ; elle est la condition même de l’habitation politique d’un ordre : la capacité d’en reprendre la maîtrise et d’en rouvrir l’autorité. +Le terme lui-même est construit à partir de *ἀρχὴ* (principe, origine, +autorité) et *κρατέω* (être ou devenir le maître). Il désigne donc la +capacité d'un dispositif de régulation à se rendre *opposable et +amendable* dans un cadre institué : une instance, un rituel, une +temporalité qui permet aux acteurs concernés de formuler, argumenter, +contester, reconfigurer. C'est l'anti-mimétisme de la scène : non pas +faire semblant d'écouter, mais *produire les conditions réelles* de +l'écoute, du délai, du recours, de la révision. L'*archicration* n'est +pas une option morale, ni un supplément d'âme procédural ; elle est la +condition même de l'habitation politique d'un ordre : la capacité d'en +reprendre la maîtrise et d'en rouvrir l'autorité. -Historiquement, les sociétés se sont dotées de formes d’*archicration* très variées : tribunaux, parlements, assemblées populaires, chambres de recours, médiations rituelles, procédures de droit coutumier, juridictions supra-étatiques. Ce sont des *scènes instituantes* qui ralentissent l’acte, l’exposent, l’ouvrent à la pluralité, et, ce faisant, lui confèrent une légitimité durable. Mais ces scènes peuvent se fermer, se vider, se fragmenter, ou être capturées. Dans les dispositifs archicratiques contemporains, l’archicration est souvent neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante. On convoque une « consultation publique » dont les résultats sont déjà fixés ; on ouvre une « plateforme participative » dont les algorithmes filtrent les réponses ; on institue des « délais de recours » dont la brièveté ou la complexité les rend impraticables. Il en résulte un effet d’évanescence de la scène : elle est là en apparence, mais elle n’opère plus en réalité. +Historiquement, les sociétés se sont dotées de formes d'*archicration* +très variées : tribunaux, parlements, assemblées populaires, chambres de +recours, médiations rituelles, procédures de droit coutumier, +juridictions supra-étatiques. Ce sont des *scènes instituantes* qui +ralentissent l'acte, l'exposent, l'ouvrent à la pluralité, et, ce +faisant, lui confèrent une légitimité durable. Mais ces scènes peuvent +se fermer, se vider, se fragmenter, ou être capturées. Dans les +dispositifs archicratiques contemporains, l'archicration est souvent +neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou rendue pratiquement +inopérante. On convoque une « consultation publique » dont les résultats +sont déjà fixés ; on ouvre une « plateforme participative » dont les +algorithmes filtrent les réponses ; on institue des « délais de recours +» dont la brièveté ou la complexité les rend impraticables. Il en +résulte un effet d'évanescence de la scène : elle est là en apparence, +mais elle n'opère plus en réalité. -C’est pourquoi l’analyse archicratique exige de penser l’*archicration* en tant que *dimension constitutive*, et non comme simple accessoire. Comme pour l’*arcalité* et la *cratialité*, l’*archicration* se déploie selon une double topologie : elle peut être interne — lorsqu’un dispositif institue en son sein des mécanismes de contestation et d’ajustement (conseils délibératifs, commissions de médiation, audits internes, organes de gouvernance participative) — ou externe — lorsqu’il est soumis à des scènes de contrôle ou d’épreuve extérieures (juridictions supranationales, contre-pouvoirs citoyens, presse, ONG, instances internationales). Ces deux modalités sont cruciales : un dispositif peut être très opposable en externe mais totalement fermé en interne, ou inversement. La santé démocratique d’une régulation se mesure à la combinaison des deux. +C'est pourquoi l'analyse archicratique exige de penser l'*archicration* +en tant que *dimension constitutive*, et non comme simple accessoire. +Comme pour l'*arcalité* et la *cratialité*, l'*archicration* se déploie +selon une double topologie : elle peut être interne — lorsqu'un +dispositif institue en son sein des mécanismes de contestation et +d'ajustement (conseils délibératifs, commissions de médiation, audits +internes, organes de gouvernance participative) — ou externe — lorsqu'il est soumis à des scènes de contrôle ou d'épreuve extérieures +(juridictions supranationales, contre-pouvoirs citoyens, presse, ONG, +instances internationales). Ces deux modalités sont cruciales : un +dispositif peut être très opposable en externe mais totalement fermé en +interne, ou inversement. La santé démocratique d'une régulation se +mesure à la combinaison des deux. -Mais, plus encore que pour les deux autres pôles, l’*archicration* possède des dimensions qualitatives et typologiques qu’il faut savoir saisir. Elle peut être politique (assemblées, élections, juridictions), sociale (médiations, associations, syndicats), symbolique (rituels de révision, cérémonies d’investiture inversées), technologique (plateformes de consultation, algorithmes de transparence), culturelle (rites de réconciliation, pratiques de dialogue interculturel), épistémique (revue de pairs, controverses scientifiques organisées), ou territoriale (forums locaux, gouvernance polycentrique). Chaque forme d’*archicration* laisse des indicateurs repérables : délais institués entre décision et exécution, existence de voies de recours, publication des motifs, pluralité des instances de jugement, accessibilité des procédures, degré de transparence des arbitrages. +Mais, plus encore que pour les deux autres pôles, l'*archicration* +possède des dimensions qualitatives et typologiques qu'il faut savoir +saisir. Elle peut être politique (assemblées, élections, juridictions), +sociale (médiations, associations, syndicats), symbolique (rituels de +révision, cérémonies d'investiture inversées), technologique +(plateformes de consultation, algorithmes de transparence), culturelle +(rites de réconciliation, pratiques de dialogue interculturel), +épistémique (revue de pairs, controverses scientifiques organisées), ou +territoriale (forums locaux, gouvernance polycentrique). Chaque forme +d'*archicration* laisse des indicateurs repérables : délais institués +entre décision et exécution, existence de voies de recours, publication +des motifs, pluralité des instances de jugement, accessibilité des +procédures, degré de transparence des arbitrages. -L’*archicration* ne se limite pas à ce qui autorise la critique ; elle est ce qui organise la temporalité de la contestation. Elle instaure le *délai nécessaire* à la réflexion, à la mobilisation, à l’argumentation. Elle confère au processus de régulation une *réversibilité* potentielle. Elle est donc une variable temporelle autant qu’institutionnelle. Là où elle est supprimée, le pouvoir se précipite en pure *cratialité* ; là où elle est hypertrophiée, il se paralyse en sur-opposabilité. Le paradigme archicratique nous invite à repérer cette tension, à en cartographier les régimes, à en diagnostiquer les pathologies. +L'*archicration* ne se limite pas à ce qui autorise la critique ; elle +est ce qui organise la temporalité de la contestation. Elle instaure le +*délai nécessaire* à la réflexion, à la mobilisation, à l'argumentation. +Elle confère au processus de régulation une *réversibilité* potentielle. +Elle est donc une variable temporelle autant qu'institutionnelle. Là où +elle est supprimée, le pouvoir se précipite en pure *cratialité* ; là où +elle est hypertrophiée, il se paralyse en sur-opposabilité. Le paradigme +archicratique nous invite à repérer cette tension, à en cartographier +les régimes, à en diagnostiquer les pathologies. -Enfin, comme pour l’arcalité et la cratialité, l’archicration doit pouvoir être qualifiée selon des repères explicites, éprouvée et, le cas échéant, falsifiée. Il ne suffit pas d’affirmer qu’une scène existe ; il faut interroger sa qualité : est-elle accessible, proportionnée, pluraliste, transparente, effective ? Est-elle un véritable lieu de remise en cause ou une simple mise en scène ? Ces questions sont au cœur de l’analyse archicratique. Elles seront systématisées dans la section 1.6, où nous formulerons des critères d’opposabilité et d’authentification, et testées empiriquement dans les études de cas du chapitre. +Enfin, comme pour l'arcalité et la cratialité, l'archicration doit +pouvoir être qualifiée selon des repères explicites, éprouvée et, le cas +échéant, falsifiée. Il ne suffit pas d'affirmer qu'une scène existe ; il +faut interroger sa qualité : est-elle accessible, proportionnée, +pluraliste, transparente, effective ? Est-elle un véritable lieu de +remise en cause ou une simple mise en scène ? Ces questions sont au cœur +de l'analyse archicratique. Elles seront systématisées dans la section +1.6, où nous formulerons des critères d'opposabilité et +d'authentification, et testées empiriquement dans les études de cas du +chapitre. -Ainsi, l’*archicration* complète le triptyque fondateur du paradigme archicratique. Privée d’archicration effective, la régulation tend à n’être plus qu’un flux technique ; lorsqu’une scène de reprise demeure praticable, elle redevient un ordre politique. Elle n’est pas un supplément éthique, mais une condition de viabilité. Elle n’est pas un idéal abstrait, mais une variable concrète, observable, localisable, qui signe la différence entre un dispositif gouvernant et un dispositif administrant. Et c’est précisément parce qu’elle est aujourd’hui menacée, neutralisée ou mimée que le paradigme archicratique s’impose : pour rendre visible ce qui se perd, pour diagnostiquer ce qui persiste, et pour imaginer ce qui pourrait s’instituer. +Ainsi, l'*archicration* complète le triptyque fondateur du paradigme +archicratique. Privée d'archicration effective, la régulation tend à +n'être plus qu'un flux technique ; lorsqu'une scène de reprise demeure +praticable, elle redevient un ordre politique. Elle n'est pas un +supplément éthique, mais une condition de viabilité. Elle n'est pas un +idéal abstrait, mais une variable concrète, observable, localisable, qui +signe la différence entre un dispositif gouvernant et un dispositif +administrant. Et c'est précisément parce qu'elle est aujourd'hui +menacée, neutralisée ou mimée que le paradigme archicratique s'impose : +pour rendre visible ce qui se perd, pour diagnostiquer ce qui persiste, +et pour imaginer ce qui pourrait s'instituer. -Les trois prises ne se subsument jamais l’une l’autre : l’*arcalité* fonde, la *cratialité* oblige, l’*archicration* met en controverse réglée. Aucune ne vaut sans les deux autres ; toute lecture binaire serait régressive. +Les trois prises ne se subsument jamais l'une l'autre : l'*arcalité* +fonde, la *cratialité* oblige, l'*archicration* met en controverse +réglée. Aucune ne vaut sans les deux autres ; toute lecture binaire +serait régressive. ### 1.1.2 — Objets associés aux trois pôles : corpus, artefacts et marqueurs de repérage -Il ne suffit pas de poser des catégories conceptuelles, aussi robustes soient-elles, pour rendre un paradigme opératoire : il faut leur adjoindre une capacité de repérage, une inscription empirique, une série d’objets tangibles par lesquels elles se laissent saisir, documenter, confronter. Car un paradigme critique n’a de valeur que s’il donne prise sur le réel. Il ne peut pas seulement désigner des logiques abstraites ; il doit cartographier des formes, repérer des signes, identifier des médiations visibles ou latentes. C’est dans cette exigence de matérialisation que s’inscrit cette section : expliciter les objets typiques, les corpus textuels, les artefacts symboliques ou les dispositifs pratiques par lesquels chaque pôle du triptyque archicratique — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — se manifeste dans les dispositifs concrets. +Il ne suffit pas de poser des catégories conceptuelles, aussi robustes +soient-elles, pour rendre un paradigme opératoire : il faut leur +adjoindre une capacité de repérage, une inscription empirique, une série +d'objets tangibles par lesquels elles se laissent saisir, documenter, +confronter. Car un paradigme critique n'a de valeur que s'il donne prise +sur le réel. Il ne peut pas seulement désigner des logiques abstraites ; +il doit cartographier des formes, repérer des signes, identifier des +médiations visibles ou latentes. C'est dans cette exigence de +matérialisation que s'inscrit cette section : expliciter les objets +typiques, les corpus textuels, les artefacts symboliques ou les +dispositifs pratiques par lesquels chaque pôle du triptyque +archicratique — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — se manifeste +dans les dispositifs concrets. -Ces objets ne sont pas de simples illustrations extérieures ; ils constituent les signes métonymiques des trois pôles. Métonymiques, parce qu’ils ne les résument pas, mais en incarnent une propriété structurante. Ils opèrent comme des points de condensation du régime de régulation. Ils sont les marqueurs visibles de ce qui se joue dans les tensions invisibles. Ils permettent à l’analyse politique de quitter le domaine du discours pour entrer dans celui des traces matérielles, des textes codifiés, des procédures instituées, des scènes ou non-scènes où le pouvoir se donne — ou se refuse — à la lecture. +Ces objets ne sont pas de simples illustrations extérieures ; ils +constituent les signes métonymiques des trois pôles. Métonymiques, parce +qu'ils ne les résument pas, mais en incarnent une propriété +structurante. Ils opèrent comme des points de condensation du régime de +régulation. Ils sont les marqueurs visibles de ce qui se joue dans les +tensions invisibles. Ils permettent à l'analyse politique de quitter le +domaine du discours pour entrer dans celui des traces matérielles, des +textes codifiés, des procédures instituées, des scènes ou non-scènes où +le pouvoir se donne — ou se refuse — à la lecture. -#### Objets d’*arcalité* : corpus fondateurs, récits de légitimation et signes d’invocation +#### Objets d'*arcalité* : corpus fondateurs, récits de légitimation et signes d'invocation -Selon nous, l’*arcalité* est toujours déjà incarnée dans des objets, des signes, des textes, des lieux et des gestes. Ce sont ces artefacts qui donnent corps au fondement, qui rendent visible et opératoire la légitimation, qui convertissent un principe en présence. Dans l’histoire politique, aucun ordre n’a existé sans s’adosser à des *objets arcaux* qui en stabilisent le récit, en performent l’autorité et en soutiennent la reproduction. Ils sont à la fois vecteurs matériels, supports symboliques, rites instituants et traces mnésiques. Ils permettent de lire l’*arcalité* non pas comme une pure transcendance, mais comme une pratique politique concrète, localisable, documentée. +Selon nous, l'*arcalité* est toujours déjà incarnée dans des objets, des +signes, des textes, des lieux et des gestes. Ce sont ces artefacts qui +donnent corps au fondement, qui rendent visible et opératoire la +légitimation, qui convertissent un principe en présence. Dans l'histoire +politique, aucun ordre n'a existé sans s'adosser à des *objets arcaux* +qui en stabilisent le récit, en performent l'autorité et en soutiennent +la reproduction. Ils sont à la fois vecteurs matériels, supports +symboliques, rites instituants et traces mnésiques. Ils permettent de +lire l'*arcalité* non pas comme une pure transcendance, mais comme une +pratique politique concrète, localisable, documentée. -Les constitutions écrites en constituent l’exemple canonique : textes fondateurs formulés dans un langage solennel, elles condensent l’invocation d’un peuple, d’un ordre, d’une souveraineté. Mais derrière le texte, il y a toujours une matérialité instituante : promulgation, signature, sceau, archivage, lecture publique, mise en scène rituelle du fondement. De la stèle civique à la charte, du serment à la déclaration, ces objets ne se bornent pas à dire la norme ; ils en instituent la présence, l’autorité et la continuité (Arendt, *Condition de l’homme moderne*, 1958 ; Lefort, *L’invention démocratique*, 1981). +Les constitutions écrites en constituent l'exemple canonique : textes +fondateurs formulés dans un langage solennel, elles condensent +l'invocation d'un peuple, d'un ordre, d'une souveraineté. Mais derrière +le texte, il y a toujours une matérialité instituante : promulgation, +signature, sceau, archivage, lecture publique, mise en scène rituelle du +fondement. De la stèle civique à la charte, du serment à la déclaration, +ces objets ne se bornent pas à dire la norme ; ils en instituent la +présence, l'autorité et la continuité (Arendt, *Condition de l'homme +moderne*, 1958 ; Lefort, *L'invention démocratique*, 1981). -Leur matérialité est décisive : blasons, devises, drapeaux, emblèmes, photographies officielles, tables de valeurs, chartes affichées. Comme l’a montré Bourdieu, l’État ne tient pas seulement par ses agents ou ses lois, mais aussi par les formes symboliques qui rendent son existence perceptible et intériorisable (*Sur l’État*, 1994). Ces objets sont ainsi des métonymies du fondement : ils n’épuisent pas l’arcalité, mais la condensent, la scénarisent et la réactivent. +Leur matérialité est décisive : blasons, devises, drapeaux, emblèmes, +photographies officielles, tables de valeurs, chartes affichées. Comme +l'a montré Bourdieu, l'État ne tient pas seulement par ses agents ou ses +lois, mais aussi par les formes symboliques qui rendent son existence +perceptible et intériorisable (*Sur l'État*, 1994). Ces objets sont +ainsi des métonymies du fondement : ils n'épuisent pas l'arcalité, mais +la condensent, la scénarisent et la réactivent. -Pour l’analyse archicratique, cela implique deux exigences. D’une part, replacer chaque objet d’*arcalité* dans sa topologie interne/externe : *est-ce une norme auto-référentielle produite par le dispositif lui-même, ou une injonction importée d’un standard extérieur ?* D’autre part, élaborer des indicateurs de vitalité : *l’objet est-il encore mobilisé par les acteurs ? suscite-t-il des interprétations concurrentes ? peut-il être contesté ou amendé ? ou bien est-il devenu un décor, un rite creux, un simple logo ?* +Pour l'analyse archicratique, cela implique deux exigences. D'une part, +replacer chaque objet d'*arcalité* dans sa topologie interne/externe : +*est-ce une norme auto-référentielle produite par le dispositif +lui-même, ou une injonction importée d'un standard extérieur ?* D'autre +part, élaborer des indicateurs de vitalité : *l'objet est-il encore +mobilisé par les acteurs ? suscite-t-il des interprétations concurrentes +? peut-il être contesté ou amendé ? ou bien est-il devenu un décor, un +rite creux, un simple logo ?* -C’est en combinant ces deux axes — topologie et vitalité — que l’on peut faire de l’*arcalité* non pas un concept vaporeux mais une grille de lecture falsifiable. Ce n’est qu’à ce prix qu’elle pourra fonctionner, dans le paradigme archicratique, comme l’un des trois piliers opératoires, et non comme un simple horizon symbolique. Nous reviendrons plus loin (section 1.4) sur une typologie détaillée des *arcalités* internes et externes, politiques, sociales, techniques, épistémiques, avec leurs indicateurs propres. Retenons pour l’instant ceci : toute régulation laisse derrière elle des *objets arcaux* ; toute *arcalité* laisse des traces ; et ces traces sont nos premières prises sur l’invisible du pouvoir. +C'est en combinant ces deux axes — topologie et vitalité — que l'on +peut faire de l'*arcalité* non pas un concept vaporeux mais une grille +de lecture falsifiable. Ce n'est qu'à ce prix qu'elle pourra +fonctionner, dans le paradigme archicratique, comme l'un des trois +piliers opératoires, et non comme un simple horizon symbolique. Nous +reviendrons plus loin (section 1.4) sur une typologie détaillée des +*arcalités* internes et externes, politiques, sociales, techniques, +épistémiques, avec leurs indicateurs propres. Retenons pour l'instant +ceci : toute régulation laisse derrière elle des *objets arcaux* ; toute +*arcalité* laisse des traces ; et ces traces sont nos premières prises +sur l'invisible du pouvoir. -#### Objets de *cratialité* : instruments d’opération, vecteurs d’action et dispositifs techniques +#### Objets de *cratialité* : instruments d'opération, vecteurs d'action et dispositifs techniques -Quand l’*arcalité* donne corps à ce qui fonde, la *cratialité* donne forme à ce qui agit. Elle ne dit pas « pourquoi », mais « comment » — et surtout : *par quoi*. L’univers de la *cratialité* est celui de l’opérativité, de l’effectuation, de la performativité matérielle de l’ordre. Ce n’est pas l’espace de la symbolisation ou de l’invocation, mais celui de la prise, du vecteur, de la chaîne d’activation, du code opératoire. Là où l’arcalité s’inscrit dans la mémoire, la cratialité s’inscrit dans la machinerie. +Quand l'*arcalité* donne corps à ce qui fonde, la *cratialité* donne +forme à ce qui agit. Elle ne dit pas « pourquoi », mais « comment » — et surtout : *par quoi*. L'univers de la *cratialité* est celui de +l'opérativité, de l'effectuation, de la performativité matérielle de +l'ordre. Ce n'est pas l'espace de la symbolisation ou de l'invocation, +mais celui de la prise, du vecteur, de la chaîne d'activation, du code +opératoire. Là où l'arcalité s'inscrit dans la mémoire, la cratialité +s'inscrit dans la machinerie. -Mais celle-ci n’est pas réductible à un appareillage technicien secondaire. Elle est ce sans quoi aucune norme ne s’effectue, aucun ordre ne tient, aucune coordination n’est possible. Comme l’a montré Foucault dans ses travaux sur les dispositifs (1977–1980), le pouvoir moderne ne se déploie pas d’abord par la loi ou par l’institution, mais par l’architecture invisible des objets techniques, des procédures ordinaires, des dispositifs modulaires. C’est dans les petites formes matérielles, dans les *objets mineurs* de l’administration, que se logent les prises effectives du pouvoir. +Mais celle-ci n'est pas réductible à un appareillage technicien +secondaire. Elle est ce sans quoi aucune norme ne s'effectue, aucun +ordre ne tient, aucune coordination n'est possible. Comme l'a montré +Foucault dans ses travaux sur les dispositifs (1977–1980), le pouvoir +moderne ne se déploie pas d'abord par la loi ou par l'institution, mais +par l'architecture invisible des objets techniques, des procédures +ordinaires, des dispositifs modulaires. C'est dans les petites formes +matérielles, dans les *objets mineurs* de l'administration, que se +logent les prises effectives du pouvoir. -Les objets de *cratialité* sont donc tous ces éléments — concrets, codifiés, outillés — qui permettent à une régulation de s’exercer dans le monde. Ils ne justifient pas ; ils opèrent. Ce sont les circulaires, les formulaires, les badges, les protocoles, les interfaces, les codes sources, les plateformes, les tableaux de bord, les feuilles de calcul, les applications mobiles, les tableaux de suivi, les logiciels de *workflow*, les API, les grilles d’indicateurs, les tableaux de synthèse, les diagrammes d’arbitrage, les tableaux croisés dynamiques, les tableaux de pilotage — en un mot, toutes les formes d’objectivation opératoire par lesquelles un ordre fait ce qu’il dit (ou dit ce qu’il fait, ou fait sans rien dire). +Les objets de *cratialité* sont donc tous ces éléments — concrets, +codifiés, outillés — qui permettent à une régulation de s'exercer dans +le monde. Ils ne justifient pas ; ils opèrent. Ce sont les circulaires, +les formulaires, les badges, les protocoles, les interfaces, les codes +sources, les plateformes, les tableaux de bord, les feuilles de calcul, +les applications mobiles, les tableaux de suivi, les logiciels de +*workflow*, les API, les grilles d'indicateurs, les tableaux de +synthèse, les diagrammes d'arbitrage, les tableaux croisés dynamiques, +les tableaux de pilotage — en un mot, toutes les formes +d'objectivation opératoire par lesquelles un ordre fait ce qu'il dit (ou +dit ce qu'il fait, ou fait sans rien dire). -Un exemple banal : le badge RFID qui contrôle l’accès à une zone hospitalière. Il ne dit rien, ne proclame rien, n’invoque aucun principe — mais il opère : il autorise ou refuse l’accès, il trace une action, il différencie les corps. Il est un *objet cratial* par excellence : silencieux, infra-symbolique, mais puissamment effectif. De même, un logiciel de codage médical dans une unité de soins — tel que le célèbre logiciel « e-PMSI » — encode la réalité clinique dans des nomenclatures standardisées. Ce n’est pas un dispositif de soin, mais un instrument de régulation tarifaire. Il ne soigne pas, mais il décide, discrètement, de combien vaut un soin. Là encore, la *cratialité* ne commande pas à haute voix, mais elle affecte à bas bruit. +Un exemple banal : le badge RFID qui contrôle l'accès à une zone +hospitalière. Il ne dit rien, ne proclame rien, n'invoque aucun principe — mais il opère : il autorise ou refuse l'accès, il trace une action, +il différencie les corps. Il est un *objet cratial* par excellence : +silencieux, infra-symbolique, mais puissamment effectif. De même, un +logiciel de codage médical dans une unité de soins — tel que le +célèbre logiciel « e-PMSI » — encode la réalité clinique dans des +nomenclatures standardisées. Ce n'est pas un dispositif de soin, mais un +instrument de régulation tarifaire. Il ne soigne pas, mais il décide, +discrètement, de combien vaut un soin. Là encore, la *cratialité* ne +commande pas à haute voix, mais elle affecte à bas bruit. -La *cratialité* moderne est numérique, logistique, contractuelle. Elle est l’ordre qui passe par des *formats*, des *fichiers*, des *interconnexions de données*, des *réseaux de dépendance technique*. Elle se manifeste dans une feuille Excel de pilotage stratégique, dans une interface RH automatisée, dans une grille de conformité RGPD, dans une API de décision algorithmique, dans un cahier des charges d’appel d’offres. Ce sont des objets de pouvoir désancrés qui ne sont rattachés à aucune scène, à aucun auteur, à aucun moment visible. Et pourtant, ce sont eux qui fixent les trajectoires, définissent les seuils, imposent les temporalités. +La *cratialité* moderne est numérique, logistique, contractuelle. Elle +est l'ordre qui passe par des *formats*, des *fichiers*, des +*interconnexions de données*, des *réseaux de dépendance technique*. +Elle se manifeste dans une feuille Excel de pilotage stratégique, dans +une interface RH automatisée, dans une grille de conformité RGPD, dans +une API de décision algorithmique, dans un cahier des charges d'appel +d'offres. Ce sont des objets de pouvoir désancrés qui ne sont rattachés +à aucune scène, à aucun auteur, à aucun moment visible. Et pourtant, ce +sont eux qui fixent les trajectoires, définissent les seuils, imposent +les temporalités. -C’est ici que le paradigme archicratique joue tout son rôle critique : la *cratialité* est souvent naturalisée — on la croit technique, neutre, purement instrumentale. Mais elle est profondément politique : chaque norme ISO, chaque critère de reporting ESG, chaque grille d’indicateur hospitalier, chaque bouton « valider » d’un formulaire de téléservice engage un choix, une structure de pouvoir, une distribution d’accès. Comme l’a montré Madeleine Akrich dans ses travaux sur la sociologie de la technique, les objets techniques embarquent des visions du monde. Un logiciel d’attribution scolaire ou de notation de crédit devient une *formule de pouvoir*, une manière d’opérer sans apparaître. +C'est ici que le paradigme archicratique joue tout son rôle critique : +la *cratialité* est souvent naturalisée — on la croit technique, +neutre, purement instrumentale. Mais elle est profondément politique : +chaque norme ISO, chaque critère de reporting ESG, chaque grille +d'indicateur hospitalier, chaque bouton « valider » d'un formulaire de +téléservice engage un choix, une structure de pouvoir, une distribution +d'accès. Comme l'a montré Madeleine Akrich dans ses travaux sur la +sociologie de la technique, les objets techniques embarquent des visions +du monde. Un logiciel d'attribution scolaire ou de notation de crédit +devient une *formule de pouvoir*, une manière d'opérer sans apparaître. -Les formes topologiques de la *cratialité* sont essentielles à penser : elle peut être interne — produite par les ressources propres du dispositif (procédures internes, personnels, logiciels maison, règles métier) — ou externe : achetée à l’extérieur, imposée par une entité surplombante, encapsulée dans un marché de conseil ou une norme transnationale. La *cratialité* d’un hôpital public peut ainsi être entièrement modelée par des outils achetés à une entreprise privée (logiciel, audit, tableau de pilotage) — et donc devenir invisible, inaccessible, irréversible pour les professionnels eux-mêmes. C’est dans ces cas que la *capture cratiale* devient notable. +Les formes topologiques de la *cratialité* sont essentielles à penser : +elle peut être interne — produite par les ressources propres du +dispositif (procédures internes, personnels, logiciels maison, règles +métier) — ou externe : achetée à l'extérieur, imposée par une entité +surplombante, encapsulée dans un marché de conseil ou une norme +transnationale. La *cratialité* d'un hôpital public peut ainsi être +entièrement modelée par des outils achetés à une entreprise privée +(logiciel, audit, tableau de pilotage) — et donc devenir invisible, +inaccessible, irréversible pour les professionnels eux-mêmes. C'est dans +ces cas que la *capture cratiale* devient notable. -Mais les objets de *cratialité* sont aussi des vecteurs de synchronisation, des instruments de temporalisation, des matrices de codage. Ils dictent les horaires, les formats, les cadres, les unités, les seuils, les priorités. Un simple formulaire Cerfa impose un langage, une logique, un ordre des cases, une hiérarchie des données. Un algorithme de traitement des signalements hiérarchise les urgences. Une clause de marché public verrouille les marges de manœuvre d’une administration pendant cinq ans. Ce ne sont pas des accessoires : ce sont les *architectures d’effectuation de l’ordre*. +Mais les objets de *cratialité* sont aussi des vecteurs de +synchronisation, des instruments de temporalisation, des matrices de +codage. Ils dictent les horaires, les formats, les cadres, les unités, +les seuils, les priorités. Un simple formulaire Cerfa impose un langage, +une logique, un ordre des cases, une hiérarchie des données. Un +algorithme de traitement des signalements hiérarchise les urgences. Une +clause de marché public verrouille les marges de manœuvre d'une +administration pendant cinq ans. Ce ne sont pas des accessoires : ce +sont les *architectures d'effectuation de l'ordre*. -La *cratialité*, ainsi comprise, ne peut être analysée que par inventaire minutieux, relevé rigoureux, analyse située. Cela exige de documenter les objets — y compris les plus triviaux : un tableau blanc de gestion des lits dans un service hospitalier, un calendrier partagé de réunions dans un cabinet ministériel, un tableau de planification logistique, une messagerie professionnelle avec ses règles de tri automatique — tous ces objets régulent, contraignent, orientent. Ils forment une écologie matérielle de la décision. +La *cratialité*, ainsi comprise, ne peut être analysée que par +inventaire minutieux, relevé rigoureux, analyse située. Cela exige de +documenter les objets — y compris les plus triviaux : un tableau blanc +de gestion des lits dans un service hospitalier, un calendrier partagé +de réunions dans un cabinet ministériel, un tableau de planification +logistique, une messagerie professionnelle avec ses règles de tri +automatique — tous ces objets régulent, contraignent, orientent. Ils +forment une écologie matérielle de la décision. -Enfin, une grille d’analyse archicratique des objets cratiaux devra intégrer quatre critères : +Enfin, une grille d'analyse archicratique des objets cratiaux devra +intégrer quatre critères : -- Accessibilité : l’objet est-il lisible ? manipulable ? réservé à des initiés ? +- Accessibilité : l'objet est-il lisible ? manipulable ? réservé à des + initiés ? -- Traçabilité : l’objet laisse-t-il une trace de la décision prise ? permet-il un audit ? +- Traçabilité : l'objet laisse-t-il une trace de la décision prise ? + permet-il un audit ? -- Opposabilité : peut-on le contester ? en discuter le contenu ou le fonctionnement ? +- Opposabilité : peut-on le contester ? en discuter le contenu ou le + fonctionnement ? -- Temporalité : l’objet impose-t-il une cadence, un délai, une irréversibilité ? +- Temporalité : l'objet impose-t-il une cadence, un délai, une + irréversibilité ? -Ces critères ne relèvent pas de la technique pure, mais du droit politique à l’action commune. Car si la *cratialité* devient inaccessible, non traçable, non opposable et instantanée, alors elle cesse d’être un instrument de régulation pour devenir un dispositif d’irréversibilité autoritaire. +Ces critères ne relèvent pas de la technique pure, mais du droit +politique à l'action commune. Car si la *cratialité* devient +inaccessible, non traçable, non opposable et instantanée, alors elle +cesse d'être un instrument de régulation pour devenir un dispositif +d'irréversibilité autoritaire. -C’est pourquoi les objets de *cratialité* sont le lieu d’un diagnostic politique majeur. Ils ne disent pas ce que l’ordre veut être, mais ce qu’il *fait vraiment*. Et c’est à ce titre qu’ils doivent être lus, commentés, cartographiés — non comme purs artefacts, mais comme formes incorporées de pouvoir régulateur. Car dans les plis du code, dans les cellules d’une feuille de calcul, dans les scripts d’un programme, dans les colonnes d’un formulaire, dans la norme d’un pilotage, se loge la part silencieuse bien qu’agissante du politique. +C'est pourquoi les objets de *cratialité* sont le lieu d'un diagnostic +politique majeur. Ils ne disent pas ce que l'ordre veut être, mais ce +qu'il *fait vraiment*. Et c'est à ce titre qu'ils doivent être lus, +commentés, cartographiés — non comme purs artefacts, mais comme formes +incorporées de pouvoir régulateur. Car dans les plis du code, dans les +cellules d'une feuille de calcul, dans les scripts d'un programme, dans +les colonnes d'un formulaire, dans la norme d'un pilotage, se loge la +part silencieuse bien qu'agissante du politique. -#### Objets d’*archicration* : scènes instituées, procédures de différé et supports d’opposabilité +#### Objets d'*archicration* : scènes instituées, procédures de différé et supports d'opposabilité -Si l’*arcalité* fonde et si la *cratialité* exécute, l’*archicration*, elle, *régule la dispute du pouvoir*. Elle ne légitime pas, elle n’effectue pas : elle ouvre, expose, retarde, reformule. Elle est cette part du politique qui consiste non pas tant à faire, qu’à rendre contestable ce qui a été fait — non pas à dire « voilà l’ordre », mais « cet ordre peut être discuté, modifié, suspendu, défait ou reconstruit ». L’*archicration* est la temporalité de l’épreuve, la scène de la dispute, le dispositif du différé. Et comme toute structure de régulation, elle laisse derrière elle — ou refuse de laisser — des traces concrètes : objets, procédures, formats, supports, signes. Ce sont eux que l’analyse archicratique doit savoir lire, documenter, opposer. +Si l'*arcalité* fonde et si la *cratialité* exécute, l'*archicration*, +elle, *régule la dispute du pouvoir*. Elle ne légitime pas, elle +n'effectue pas : elle ouvre, expose, retarde, reformule. Elle est cette +part du politique qui consiste non pas tant à faire, qu'à rendre +contestable ce qui a été fait — non pas à dire « voilà l'ordre », mais +« cet ordre peut être discuté, modifié, suspendu, défait ou reconstruit +». L'*archicration* est la temporalité de l'épreuve, la scène de la +dispute, le dispositif du différé. Et comme toute structure de +régulation, elle laisse derrière elle — ou refuse de laisser — des +traces concrètes : objets, procédures, formats, supports, signes. Ce +sont eux que l'analyse archicratique doit savoir lire, documenter, +opposer. -Les *objets archicratifs* sont ceux qui manifestent — ou masquent — l’existence d’une scène d’épreuve. Ils sont les *métonymies du contradictoire institué* : registres de saisine, convocations formelles, procès-verbaux, comptes-rendus de délibération, ordres du jour rendus publics, auditions publiques, formulaires de contestation, décisions motivées, délais de recours, avis minoritaires, publications contradictoires, protocoles d’instruction, rapports d’expertise, consultations encadrées, plateformes participatives réellement interactives, avis du Conseil d’État, saisines d’une autorité de régulation, etc. +Les *objets archicratifs* sont ceux qui manifestent — ou masquent — l'existence d'une scène d'épreuve. Ils sont les *métonymies du +contradictoire institué* : registres de saisine, convocations formelles, +procès-verbaux, comptes-rendus de délibération, ordres du jour rendus +publics, auditions publiques, formulaires de contestation, décisions +motivées, délais de recours, avis minoritaires, publications +contradictoires, protocoles d'instruction, rapports d'expertise, +consultations encadrées, plateformes participatives réellement +interactives, avis du Conseil d'État, saisines d'une autorité de +régulation, etc. -Ces objets n’ont pas pour fonction de produire un effet régulateur direct. Mais ils changent tout au monde politique, car ils transforment un ordre de fait en un ordre contestable, c’est-à-dire potentiellement réversible. Là réside leur pouvoir propre : ils inscrivent la norme dans le champ de la délibération. Ils ne gouvernent pas, mais ils rendent le gouvernement visible, énonçable et amendable. +Ces objets n'ont pas pour fonction de produire un effet régulateur +direct. Mais ils changent tout au monde politique, car ils transforment +un ordre de fait en un ordre contestable, c'est-à-dire potentiellement +réversible. Là réside leur pouvoir propre : ils inscrivent la norme dans +le champ de la délibération. Ils ne gouvernent pas, mais ils rendent le +gouvernement visible, énonçable et amendable. -Un simple registre de saisine citoyenne — tenu à jour, accessible, lisible — est un puissant *objet d’archicration*. Il permet à une décision d’être rouverte, à une politique d’être contestée, à un dispositif d’être réévalué. Une décision administrative motivée — dont les motifs sont publiés, les délais indiqués, les voies de recours explicitement mentionnées — devient, en ce sens, un support d’opposabilité. Inversement, son absence signe une forme d’autoritarisme silencieux, une neutralisation de la scène. De même, un procès-verbal d’audition contradictoire — où les arguments des différentes parties sont repris, répondus, hiérarchisés — est un *objet archicratif* à haute valeur politique. Il rend visible une épreuve, documente l’écoute et matérialise la scène. +Un simple registre de saisine citoyenne — tenu à jour, accessible, +lisible — est un puissant *objet d'archicration*. Il permet à une +décision d'être rouverte, à une politique d'être contestée, à un +dispositif d'être réévalué. Une décision administrative motivée — dont +les motifs sont publiés, les délais indiqués, les voies de recours +explicitement mentionnées — devient, en ce sens, un support +d'opposabilité. Inversement, son absence signe une forme d'autoritarisme +silencieux, une neutralisation de la scène. De même, un procès-verbal +d'audition contradictoire — où les arguments des différentes parties +sont repris, répondus, hiérarchisés — est un *objet archicratif* à +haute valeur politique. Il rend visible une épreuve, documente l'écoute +et matérialise la scène. -Mais comme pour les *objets arcaux et cratiaux*, la puissance politique d’un *objet archicratif* ne tient pas à sa simple existence formelle. Encore faut-il qu’il soit effectif, accessible, activable. Une plateforme de consultation publique qui n’est ni analysée, ni suivie d’effet, ni même modérée de manière transparente, n’est pas un objet d’archicration — c’est *un simulacre archicratique*. Un délai de recours de 24 heures sans possibilité d’assistance juridique n’est pas un mécanisme de contradictoire, mais un leurre procédural. Il en va de même pour un registre de doléances enfermé dans une armoire, jamais traité, jamais rendu public, n’ouvrant aucune scène, ne garantissant aucun différé. Il mime l’ouverture archicrative, tout en l’empêchant. +Mais comme pour les *objets arcaux et cratiaux*, la puissance politique +d'un *objet archicratif* ne tient pas à sa simple existence formelle. +Encore faut-il qu'il soit effectif, accessible, activable. Une +plateforme de consultation publique qui n'est ni analysée, ni suivie +d'effet, ni même modérée de manière transparente, n'est pas un objet +d'archicration — c'est *un simulacre archicratique*. Un délai de +recours de 24 heures sans possibilité d'assistance juridique n'est pas +un mécanisme de contradictoire, mais un leurre procédural. Il en va de +même pour un registre de doléances enfermé dans une armoire, jamais +traité, jamais rendu public, n'ouvrant aucune scène, ne garantissant +aucun différé. Il mime l'ouverture archicrative, tout en l'empêchant. -Ainsi, les *objets d’archicration* sont hautement vulnérables à la capture, au vide symbolique, à la neutralisation rituelle. Ce sont les objets les plus spectaculaires, mais aussi les plus faciles à rendre ineffectifs, car leur forme suffit à donner l’illusion de la dispute. D’où l’importance, dans le paradigme archicratique, de ne jamais les considérer de manière formelle ou nominale, mais toujours selon une grille d’évaluation substantielle : +Ainsi, les *objets d'archicration* sont hautement vulnérables à la +capture, au vide symbolique, à la neutralisation rituelle. Ce sont les +objets les plus spectaculaires, mais aussi les plus faciles à rendre +ineffectifs, car leur forme suffit à donner l'illusion de la dispute. +D'où l'importance, dans le paradigme archicratique, de ne jamais les +considérer de manière formelle ou nominale, mais toujours selon une +grille d'évaluation substantielle : -- Accessibilité : l’objet est-il public ? visible ? intelligible ? +- Accessibilité : l'objet est-il public ? visible ? intelligible ? -- Temporalité : le différé est-il suffisant pour permettre une réponse ? Y a-t-il une fenêtre réelle de contestation ? +- Temporalité : le différé est-il suffisant pour permettre une réponse ? + Y a-t-il une fenêtre réelle de contestation ? -- Effectivité : le recours aboutit-il ? La contestation peut-elle infléchir ou suspendre la régulation ? +- Effectivité : le recours aboutit-il ? La contestation peut-elle + infléchir ou suspendre la régulation ? -- Traçabilité : la procédure laisse-t-elle une trace ? Une mémoire de la dispute est-elle produite ? +- Traçabilité : la procédure laisse-t-elle une trace ? Une mémoire de la + dispute est-elle produite ? -- Pluralité : différentes voix ont-elles été reconnues, prises en compte, confrontées dans la procédure ? +- Pluralité : différentes voix ont-elles été reconnues, prises en + compte, confrontées dans la procédure ? -- Revocabilité : existe-t-il une possibilité concrète d’abroger, modifier, ou reformuler une arcalité ou une cratialité ? +- Revocabilité : existe-t-il une possibilité concrète d'abroger, + modifier, ou reformuler une arcalité ou une cratialité ? -Chaque *objet d’archicration* doit donc être interrogé selon ces critères. Un avis minoritaire publié en annexe d’un rapport peut avoir une fonction archicratique extrêmement forte, surtout s’il est repris par la presse ou les juridictions. Inversement, une « consultation » massive ne donnant aucune suite — ou sans intégration lisible dans la décision finale — peut être un ciment d’euphémisation, une pure forme d’archicration mimée et simulée. +Chaque *objet d'archicration* doit donc être interrogé selon ces +critères. Un avis minoritaire publié en annexe d'un rapport peut avoir +une fonction archicratique extrêmement forte, surtout s'il est repris +par la presse ou les juridictions. Inversement, une « consultation » +massive ne donnant aucune suite — ou sans intégration lisible dans la +décision finale — peut être un ciment d'euphémisation, une pure forme +d'archicration mimée et simulée. -Enfin, il convient d’insister sur la topologie des *objets archicratifs*. Ils peuvent être internes : conseils délibératifs, comités d’éthique, médiateurs, dispositifs de saisine interne, commissions de réexamen. Ils peuvent être externes : recours juridictionnels, mobilisation d’instances indépendantes (Défenseur des droits, Conseil d’État, Autorité de régulation), interventions médiatiques documentées, pétitions publiques structurées, tribunaux populaires. Un système politique robuste combine les deux : il s’auto-dispute en interne, mais se rend aussi disputable de l’extérieur. +Enfin, il convient d'insister sur la topologie des *objets +archicratifs*. Ils peuvent être internes : conseils délibératifs, +comités d'éthique, médiateurs, dispositifs de saisine interne, +commissions de réexamen. Ils peuvent être externes : recours +juridictionnels, mobilisation d'instances indépendantes (Défenseur des +droits, Conseil d'État, Autorité de régulation), interventions +médiatiques documentées, pétitions publiques structurées, tribunaux +populaires. Un système politique robuste combine les deux : il +s'auto-dispute en interne, mais se rend aussi disputable de l'extérieur. -Dans des configurations autarchicratiques, les objets d’archicration sont souvent mimés en interne — pour donner l’illusion de la scène — tandis que les dispositifs externes d’opposabilité sont rendus inopérants, dilués ou purement formels. Ce n’est pas qu’un régime serait ouvertement autarchicratique ; c’est que certaines fonctions, certaines séquences ou certains vecteurs de régulation se déploient selon une logique autarchicratique : par neutralisation de l’épreuve, occultation des fondements et saturation opératoire. L’autarchicratie ne désigne donc pas une oligarchie instituée, mais une dérive silencieuse de la régulation qui peut traverser tous les régimes, tous les secteurs, et dont certains groupes sociaux ou certaines fonctions deviennent les porteurs structurels — sans en revendiquer pour autant le nom. Nous les appellerons ici, si l’on veut les nommer rigoureusement : des porteurs de fermeture autarchique. +Dans des configurations autarchicratiques, les objets d'archicration +sont souvent mimés en interne — pour donner l'illusion de la scène — tandis que les dispositifs externes d'opposabilité sont rendus +inopérants, dilués ou purement formels. Ce n'est pas qu'un régime serait +ouvertement autarchicratique ; c'est que certaines fonctions, certaines +séquences ou certains vecteurs de régulation se déploient selon une +logique autarchicratique : par neutralisation de l'épreuve, occultation +des fondements et saturation opératoire. L'autarchicratie ne désigne +donc pas une oligarchie instituée, mais une dérive silencieuse de la +régulation qui peut traverser tous les régimes, tous les secteurs, et +dont certains groupes sociaux ou certaines fonctions deviennent les +porteurs structurels — sans en revendiquer pour autant le nom. Nous +les appellerons ici, si l'on veut les nommer rigoureusement : des +porteurs de fermeture autarchique. -Car c’est bien cela qui est en jeu : non pas l’existence théorique d’une contestation, mais sa possibilité instituée, régulée, documentée. Là où l’archicration est neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante, le pouvoir tend à devenir indiscutable — non par tyrannie explicite, mais par dissolution des conditions effectives de la scène. Là où elle est simulée, le politique devient un théâtre d’ombres. Là où elle est instituée, explicite, traçable et opposable, elle redonne au pouvoir sa dimension dialogique, temporelle et politique. +Car c'est bien cela qui est en jeu : non pas l'existence théorique d'une +contestation, mais sa possibilité instituée, régulée, documentée. Là où +l'archicration est neutralisée, mimée, relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou +rendue pratiquement inopérante, le pouvoir tend à devenir indiscutable — non par tyrannie explicite, mais par dissolution des conditions +effectives de la scène. Là où elle est simulée, le politique devient un +théâtre d'ombres. Là où elle est instituée, explicite, traçable et +opposable, elle redonne au pouvoir sa dimension dialogique, temporelle +et politique. -Les *objets archicratifs* ne sont donc ni accessoires ni résiduels : ils sont la clef de voûte du politique comme épreuve. Ce sont eux qui assurent qu’une norme n’est pas un destin, qu’une régulation peut être reconfigurée, qu’un ordre n’est pas clos. Ce sont eux qui, au sein de la structure archicratique, permettent que le pouvoir soit tenu pour comptable, et donc transformable. +Les *objets archicratifs* ne sont donc ni accessoires ni résiduels : ils +sont la clef de voûte du politique comme épreuve. Ce sont eux qui +assurent qu'une norme n'est pas un destin, qu'une régulation peut être +reconfigurée, qu'un ordre n'est pas clos. Ce sont eux qui, au sein de la +structure archicratique, permettent que le pouvoir soit tenu pour +comptable, et donc transformable. #### Vers une cartographie métonymique des dispositifs -Il est nécessaire mais non suffisant d’identifier des principes abstraits — fondement, opération, dispute — pour penser une régulation politique. Il faut pouvoir les repérer dans le réel, en observer les figures incarnées, en déchiffrer les signes, en documenter les objets. C’est à cette fin que le paradigme archicratique se dote d’une sémiologie concrète des dispositifs : une cartographie métonymique, capable de lire dans les objets non pas leur fonction immédiate, mais le régime politique implicite qu’ils contribuent à instituer. Cette lecture métonymique repose sur une hypothèse forte : les objets matériels et symboliques d’une régulation — aussi techniques, mineurs ou silencieux soient-ils — disent quelque chose de la qualité politique de l’ordre qu’ils soutiennent. +Il est nécessaire mais non suffisant d'identifier des principes +abstraits — fondement, opération, dispute — pour penser une +régulation politique. Il faut pouvoir les repérer dans le réel, en +observer les figures incarnées, en déchiffrer les signes, en documenter +les objets. C'est à cette fin que le paradigme archicratique se dote +d'une sémiologie concrète des dispositifs : une cartographie +métonymique, capable de lire dans les objets non pas leur fonction +immédiate, mais le régime politique implicite qu'ils contribuent à +instituer. Cette lecture métonymique repose sur une hypothèse forte : +les objets matériels et symboliques d'une régulation — aussi +techniques, mineurs ou silencieux soient-ils — disent quelque chose de +la qualité politique de l'ordre qu'ils soutiennent. -Un badge d’accès, un formulaire de recours, un tableau de bord algorithmique, une charte d’éthique, une convocation à une commission, un registre de délibération, un logiciel de pilotage budgétaire ou un protocole de saisine sont autant d’objets d’apparence neutre — mais qui, situés dans un écosystème de régulation, expriment une position archicratique : ils sont les métonymies de la structure, au sens où chaque objet, bien qu’apparemment partiel, renvoie à l’ensemble du régime dont il procède. +Un badge d'accès, un formulaire de recours, un tableau de bord +algorithmique, une charte d'éthique, une convocation à une commission, +un registre de délibération, un logiciel de pilotage budgétaire ou un +protocole de saisine sont autant d'objets d'apparence neutre — mais +qui, situés dans un écosystème de régulation, expriment une position +archicratique : ils sont les métonymies de la structure, au sens où +chaque objet, bien qu'apparemment partiel, renvoie à l'ensemble du +régime dont il procède. -Un badge sans nom, sans fonction lisible, sans statut accessible ne signale pas seulement un problème d’accès : il objective une dissociation entre *cratialité* et *archicration*, en empêchant la formulation de toute contestation localisée. Une charte d’entreprise affichée dans un hall, non opposable juridiquement, manifeste une *arcalité* de façade, sans ancrage normatif. Un algorithme qui produit des décisions sans en publier les règles institue une *cratialité* opaque, sans archicration effective possible. Ce sont là des objets discrets — mais qui configurent le pouvoir, organisent l’action, orientent la reconnaissance, verrouillent les possibilités de mise en cause. +Un badge sans nom, sans fonction lisible, sans statut accessible ne +signale pas seulement un problème d'accès : il objective une +dissociation entre *cratialité* et *archicration*, en empêchant la +formulation de toute contestation localisée. Une charte d'entreprise +affichée dans un hall, non opposable juridiquement, manifeste une +*arcalité* de façade, sans ancrage normatif. Un algorithme qui produit +des décisions sans en publier les règles institue une *cratialité* +opaque, sans archicration effective possible. Ce sont là des objets +discrets — mais qui configurent le pouvoir, organisent l'action, +orientent la reconnaissance, verrouillent les possibilités de mise en +cause. -Lire une régulation politiquement, c’est donc lire les objets qui la rendent possible, et interroger la grammaire que ces objets rendent visible ou invisible. Or, cette grammaire ne peut être saisie qu’en articulant trois dimensions : +Lire une régulation politiquement, c'est donc lire les objets qui la +rendent possible, et interroger la grammaire que ces objets rendent +visible ou invisible. Or, cette grammaire ne peut être saisie qu'en +articulant trois dimensions : -- Le pôle auquel appartient l’objet (*arcalité, cratialité, archicration*) +- Le pôle auquel appartient l'objet (*arcalité, cratialité, + archicration*) - Sa topologie (interne ou externe au dispositif) ; -- Son degré d’opposabilité (décidable, accessible, falsifiable, désactivé, mimé). +- Son degré d'opposabilité (décidable, accessible, falsifiable, + désactivé, mimé). -Cette triple clé permet une cartographie critique des dispositifs : non plus fondée sur leur déclaration institutionnelle, mais sur leur matérialité opératoire réelle. Elle permet aussi de déconstruire les fictions d’ouverture (quand une instance se prétend accessible sans organiser en réalité la pratique du recours), ou les illusions de performance (quand une procédure est techniquement fluide, mais politiquement irréversible). +Cette triple clé permet une cartographie critique des dispositifs : non +plus fondée sur leur déclaration institutionnelle, mais sur leur +matérialité opératoire réelle. Elle permet aussi de déconstruire les +fictions d'ouverture (quand une instance se prétend accessible sans +organiser en réalité la pratique du recours), ou les illusions de +performance (quand une procédure est techniquement fluide, mais +politiquement irréversible). -Mais cette lecture métonymique ne s’oppose pas à une lecture systémique : au contraire, elle la densifie, en réinscrivant chaque dispositif dans un tissu d’interactions politiques. Chaque objet doit être lu comme le signe d’un régime, comme le symptôme d’un équilibre ou d’un déséquilibre entre les trois pôles, comme l’indice d’une articulation spécifique entre le fondement, l’opération et la dispute. Un formulaire, une convocation, une écharpe tricolore, un timbre administratif, une case à cocher sur une plateforme numérique, un ordre du jour publié — tous sont des *objets-signes*. Ils sont les unités matérielles d’une régulation, les cristallisations d’une architecture politique. +Mais cette lecture métonymique ne s'oppose pas à une lecture systémique +: au contraire, elle la densifie, en réinscrivant chaque dispositif dans +un tissu d'interactions politiques. Chaque objet doit être lu comme le +signe d'un régime, comme le symptôme d'un équilibre ou d'un déséquilibre +entre les trois pôles, comme l'indice d'une articulation spécifique +entre le fondement, l'opération et la dispute. Un formulaire, une +convocation, une écharpe tricolore, un timbre administratif, une case à +cocher sur une plateforme numérique, un ordre du jour publié — tous +sont des *objets-signes*. Ils sont les unités matérielles d'une +régulation, les cristallisations d'une architecture politique. ### 1.1.3 — Articulation dynamique des trois pôles -Si le paradigme archicratique repose sur cette tripartition fondamentale, il serait erroné d’en faire une grille statique ou une typologie figée. Ce qui fait sa valeur heuristique ne se résume pas en la distinction de ces trois pôles, mais dans la mise en tension dynamique qui les relie, les contraint, les déséquilibre ou les ajuste dans toute situation de régulation. Loin d’être des sphères séparées, ces trois dimensions n’existent que dans leur interaction mutuelle, dans une dialectique structurante où chacune affecte la viabilité des deux autres. C’est cette logique d’interdépendance — parfois harmonieuse, souvent tendue, parfois rompue — qui constitue la véritable mécanique différentielle de l’analyse archicratique. +Si le paradigme archicratique repose sur cette tripartition +fondamentale, il serait erroné d'en faire une grille statique ou une +typologie figée. Ce qui fait sa valeur heuristique ne se résume pas en +la distinction de ces trois pôles, mais dans la mise en tension +dynamique qui les relie, les contraint, les déséquilibre ou les ajuste +dans toute situation de régulation. Loin d'être des sphères séparées, +ces trois dimensions n'existent que dans leur interaction mutuelle, dans +une dialectique structurante où chacune affecte la viabilité des deux +autres. C'est cette logique d'interdépendance — parfois harmonieuse, +souvent tendue, parfois rompue — qui constitue la véritable mécanique +différentielle de l'analyse archicratique. -L’arcalité peut subsister à l’état de vestige, de référence peu opérante ou de fondement faiblement mobilisé ; la cratialité peut s’autonomiser sur fond d’arcalité peu exposable ou faiblement assumée ; l’archicration peut être formellement instituée tout en restant sans prise réelle sur la trajectoire décisionnelle. Chacun de ces désajustements produit des formes pathologiques de régulation, non par la faute d’un défaut absolu, mais par la déconnexion ou la dégradation des pôles entre eux. L’archicratie ne devient intelligible qu’en appréciant le degré d’articulation effective — et non simplement déclarative — entre ces trois dimensions. +L'arcalité peut subsister à l'état de vestige, de référence peu opérante +ou de fondement faiblement mobilisé ; la cratialité peut s'autonomiser +sur fond d'arcalité peu exposable ou faiblement assumée ; l'archicration +peut être formellement instituée tout en restant sans prise réelle sur +la trajectoire décisionnelle. Chacun de ces désajustements produit des +formes pathologiques de régulation, non par la faute d'un défaut absolu, +mais par la déconnexion ou la dégradation des pôles entre eux. +L'archicratie ne devient intelligible qu'en appréciant le degré +d'articulation effective — et non simplement déclarative — entre ces +trois dimensions. -Pour cette raison, il est préférable de substituer à la simple figure du triangle une lecture tensorielle, c’est-à-dire un champ de forces où les trois pôles se soutiennent, se contraignent, se déséquilibrent ou se réajustent. L’*arcalité* oriente le sens ; la *cratialité* donne prise au réel ; l’*archicration* introduit le différé, le possible, l’inédit. Leur co-présence est la condition minimale d’un ordre politique habitable. Leur neutralisation, leur mise en latence ou leur domination univoque constitue, à l’inverse, le signe d’un régime appauvri, voire fermé et autoritaire. +Pour cette raison, il est préférable de substituer à la simple figure du +triangle une lecture tensorielle, c'est-à-dire un champ de forces où les +trois pôles se soutiennent, se contraignent, se déséquilibrent ou se +réajustent. L'*arcalité* oriente le sens ; la *cratialité* donne prise +au réel ; l'*archicration* introduit le différé, le possible, l'inédit. +Leur co-présence est la condition minimale d'un ordre politique +habitable. Leur neutralisation, leur mise en latence ou leur domination +univoque constitue, à l'inverse, le signe d'un régime appauvri, voire +fermé et autoritaire. -Ce n’est donc pas la présence de chacun des trois pôles, pris isolément, qui garantit la qualité politique d’une régulation, mais la manière dont ils se répondent, se nourrissent, se corrigent ou s’affrontent. Une *arcalité* active, mais non révisable, produit du dogmatisme. Une *cratialité* hyper-efficiente à fondement peu exposable ou désarrimé engendre de la brutalité technicienne. Une *archicration* procédurale sans fondation partagée tourne à vide sans adhésion dans le pur arbitraire. L’analyse archicratique repose alors sur un principe de consistance dynamique : *toute régulation politiquement viable est un régime où la légitimité fondatrice, la puissance opératoire et la scène contradictoire s’équilibrent par ajustements réciproques.* +Ce n'est donc pas la présence de chacun des trois pôles, pris isolément, +qui garantit la qualité politique d'une régulation, mais la manière dont +ils se répondent, se nourrissent, se corrigent ou s'affrontent. Une +*arcalité* active, mais non révisable, produit du dogmatisme. Une +*cratialité* hyper-efficiente à fondement peu exposable ou désarrimé +engendre de la brutalité technicienne. Une *archicration* procédurale +sans fondation partagée tourne à vide sans adhésion dans le pur +arbitraire. L'analyse archicratique repose alors sur un principe de +consistance dynamique : *toute régulation politiquement viable est un +régime où la légitimité fondatrice, la puissance opératoire et la scène +contradictoire s'équilibrent par ajustements réciproques.* -Cette dynamique se lit dans la manière dont une règle renvoie à une doctrine, dont un instrument laisse place à une critique, dont une norme peut évoluer par révision. Prenons un exemple : un protocole sanitaire. Il peut être fondé (*arcalité* scientifique ou juridique), appliqué (*cratialité* technique et administrative), mais si aucune révision n’est possible en cas de controverse, l’*archicration* fait défaut — et le dispositif devient pure contrainte et imposition. À l’inverse, une procédure ouverte à la contestation qui ne serait pas adossée à un fondement clair produirait du désordre, du flottement ou de l’épuisement normatif. +Cette dynamique se lit dans la manière dont une règle renvoie à une +doctrine, dont un instrument laisse place à une critique, dont une norme +peut évoluer par révision. Prenons un exemple : un protocole sanitaire. +Il peut être fondé (*arcalité* scientifique ou juridique), appliqué +(*cratialité* technique et administrative), mais si aucune révision +n'est possible en cas de controverse, l'*archicration* fait défaut — et le dispositif devient pure contrainte et imposition. À l'inverse, une +procédure ouverte à la contestation qui ne serait pas adossée à un +fondement clair produirait du désordre, du flottement ou de l'épuisement +normatif. -Il importe alors de penser la régulation non comme une mécanique fluide, mais comme une tension permanente entre ces trois forces. Cette tension est le lieu même du politique : non pas la résolution harmonieuse des contradictions, mais leur tenue articulée, leur co-présence régulée, leur exposition mutuelle. Une société démocratique n’est pas celle qui équilibre idéalement les trois pôles, mais celle qui rend visible et opposable leurs conflits, et qui instaure les moyens de leur reprise collective. +Il importe alors de penser la régulation non comme une mécanique fluide, +mais comme une tension permanente entre ces trois forces. Cette tension +est le lieu même du politique : non pas la résolution harmonieuse des +contradictions, mais leur tenue articulée, leur co-présence régulée, +leur exposition mutuelle. Une société démocratique n'est pas celle qui +équilibre idéalement les trois pôles, mais celle qui rend visible et +opposable leurs conflits, et qui instaure les moyens de leur reprise +collective. -C’est pourquoi la cartographie archicratique ne vise pas à repérer des dispositifs « purs », mais à diagnostiquer des régimes de composition : *comment s’agencent, dans tel ou tel secteur, l’arcalité, la cratialité et l’archicration ? Quelle est la qualité de leur articulation ? Quels seuils de domination ou de carence observe-t-on ?* Cette dynamique nous conduit directement à la section 1.1.4, où nous décrirons les premiers cas limites — ces régulations déséquilibrées où un seul pôle l’emporte, où les autres se retirent, où l’ordre se fige ou s’effondre. Ce sont ces cas extrêmes qui révéleront, par contraste, ce qui fait la cohérence — ou la défaillance — d’une régulation. +C'est pourquoi la cartographie archicratique ne vise pas à repérer des +dispositifs « purs », mais à diagnostiquer des régimes de composition : +*comment s'agencent, dans tel ou tel secteur, l'arcalité, la cratialité +et l'archicration ? Quelle est la qualité de leur articulation ? Quels +seuils de domination ou de carence observe-t-on ?* Cette dynamique nous +conduit directement à la section 1.1.4, où nous décrirons les premiers +cas limites — ces régulations déséquilibrées où un seul pôle +l'emporte, où les autres se retirent, où l'ordre se fige ou s'effondre. +Ce sont ces cas extrêmes qui révéleront, par contraste, ce qui fait la +cohérence — ou la défaillance — d'une régulation. -Ainsi, loin de reposer sur une addition de fonctions ou un empilement de principes, le paradigme archicratique se fonde sur l’analyse différentielle de l’articulation dynamique entre fondement, opération et épreuve. C’est cette tension constitutive — ni soluble, ni effaçable — qui fait de la régulation un fait politique, et non une simple organisation. Et c’est par l’analyse rigoureuse de cette dynamique que nous pourrons, dans les sections ultérieures, préciser les premiers déséquilibres (1.1.4), puis plus tard dans le chapitre, les formes dynamiques de la tenue archicratique (1.5), les repères heuristiques (1.6) et les morphologies opérantes (1.7). +Ainsi, loin de reposer sur une addition de fonctions ou un empilement de +principes, le paradigme archicratique se fonde sur l'analyse +différentielle de l'articulation dynamique entre fondement, opération et +épreuve. C'est cette tension constitutive — ni soluble, ni effaçable — qui fait de la régulation un fait politique, et non une simple +organisation. Et c'est par l'analyse rigoureuse de cette dynamique que +nous pourrons, dans les sections ultérieures, préciser les premiers +déséquilibres (1.1.4), puis plus tard dans le chapitre, les formes +dynamiques de la tenue archicratique (1.5), les repères heuristiques +(1.6) et les morphologies opérantes (1.7). ### 1.1.4 — Premiers cas limites : déséquilibres, courts-circuitages et régulations instables -Encore faut-il que notre construction tripartite permette de repérer les régulations qui échouent, non par absence de dispositifs, mais par déséquilibre interne entre les trois pôles constitutifs du paradigme. C’est précisément dans ces cas limites — ces régimes pathologiques où un seul pôle écrase ou court-circuite les autres — que la robustesse analytique du paradigme archicratique peut se vérifier. Ce ne sont pas des anomalies anecdotiques, mais des figures structurantes de la régulation contemporaine, des formes typiques de désarticulation qui signent l’entrée dans une zone grise du politique : ni complètement illégitime, ni ouvertement dictatoriale, mais oblitérant l’opposabilité. +Encore faut-il que notre construction tripartite permette de repérer les +régulations qui échouent, non par absence de dispositifs, mais par +déséquilibre interne entre les trois pôles constitutifs du paradigme. +C'est précisément dans ces cas limites — ces régimes pathologiques où +un seul pôle écrase ou court-circuite les autres — que la robustesse +analytique du paradigme archicratique peut se vérifier. Ce ne sont pas +des anomalies anecdotiques, mais des figures structurantes de la +régulation contemporaine, des formes typiques de désarticulation qui +signent l'entrée dans une zone grise du politique : ni complètement +illégitime, ni ouvertement dictatoriale, mais oblitérant l'opposabilité. -La première configuration critique est celle de la cratialité orpheline, où la puissance d’agir tend à s’autonomiser sur fond d’arcalité faiblement formulable et d’archicration neutralisée, comprimée ou rendue pratiquement inopérante. On y observe des chaînes d’exécution hautement performantes — plateformes logistiques, tableaux de pilotage budgétaire, algorithmes décisionnels, procédures automatisées — qui fonctionnent avec des fondements peu explicités pour les affectés et avec des voies de reprise, de contestation ou de recours soit relocalisées hors d’atteinte, soit fictives, soit matériellement impraticables. La décision y devient impersonnelle, difficilement attaquable, et souvent non négociable dans les faits. Ce qui caractérise cette configuration n’est donc pas l’absence absolue de fondement ou de scène, mais leur dégradation opératoire : l’arcalité subsiste sous forme implicite, technique ou déléguée ; l’archicration subsiste comme possibilité affaiblie, mimée ou neutralisée ; tandis que la cratialité, elle, concentre l’effectivité. +La première configuration critique est celle de la cratialité orpheline, +où la puissance d'agir tend à s'autonomiser sur fond d'arcalité +faiblement formulable et d'archicration neutralisée, comprimée ou rendue +pratiquement inopérante. On y observe des chaînes d'exécution hautement +performantes — plateformes logistiques, tableaux de pilotage +budgétaire, algorithmes décisionnels, procédures automatisées — qui +fonctionnent avec des fondements peu explicités pour les affectés et +avec des voies de reprise, de contestation ou de recours soit +relocalisées hors d'atteinte, soit fictives, soit matériellement +impraticables. La décision y devient impersonnelle, difficilement +attaquable, et souvent non négociable dans les faits. Ce qui caractérise +cette configuration n'est donc pas l'absence absolue de fondement ou de +scène, mais leur dégradation opératoire : l'arcalité subsiste sous forme +implicite, technique ou déléguée ; l'archicration subsiste comme +possibilité affaiblie, mimée ou neutralisée ; tandis que la cratialité, +elle, concentre l'effectivité. -La seconde figure limite est celle de l’*arcalité* désincarnée, où les récits fondateurs subsistent — parfois en majesté — mais ne produisent plus d’effet régulateur. Constitutions vénérées, serments solennels, principes éthiques, déclarations universelles sont mobilisés dans les discours, affichés dans les chartes, mais ne traversent plus les dispositifs opératoires. Il en résulte un régime de performativité déconnectée : les institutions prétendent être fondées en droit ou en humanisme, mais leur fonctionnement réel s’émancipe totalement de ce socle. L’arcalité devient alors décorative, voire purement instrumentale : c’est le cas des appels républicains dans des politiques autoritaires, des valeurs affichées dans des dispositifs inaccessibles, ou des codes d’éthique utilisés pour justifier des dispositifs de surveillance. Ce désajustement génère une forme de désorientation politique profonde, où la norme déclarée et la norme opératoire ne se rejoignent plus. +La seconde figure limite est celle de l'*arcalité* désincarnée, où les +récits fondateurs subsistent — parfois en majesté — mais ne +produisent plus d'effet régulateur. Constitutions vénérées, serments +solennels, principes éthiques, déclarations universelles sont mobilisés +dans les discours, affichés dans les chartes, mais ne traversent plus +les dispositifs opératoires. Il en résulte un régime de performativité +déconnectée : les institutions prétendent être fondées en droit ou en +humanisme, mais leur fonctionnement réel s'émancipe totalement de ce +socle. L'arcalité devient alors décorative, voire purement instrumentale +: c'est le cas des appels républicains dans des politiques autoritaires, +des valeurs affichées dans des dispositifs inaccessibles, ou des codes +d'éthique utilisés pour justifier des dispositifs de surveillance. Ce +désajustement génère une forme de désorientation politique profonde, où +la norme déclarée et la norme opératoire ne se rejoignent plus. -La troisième pathologie est celle de l’*archicration* fictive, où des scènes de dispute sont instaurées, mais sans effectivité palpable. Le dispositif donne l’apparence d’un contradictoire — consultation publique, boîte à idées, forum participatif, convention citoyenne, droit de recours — mais en réalité, les conditions de l’opposabilité demeurent formelles ou insuffisamment opérantes : délais trop courts, opacité des motifs, non-publication des réponses, filtrage des revendications, absence de prise sur la décision finale. Cette forme de mise en scène procédurale produit une illusion de démocratie régulée, où la scène d’épreuve est ritualisée sans effet. L’*archicration* existe ici comme spectacle, non comme épreuve, et contribue paradoxalement à renforcer l’irréversibilité des décisions prises. C’est le cas par exemple de certaines concertations environnementales menées en urgence, où les contributions citoyennes sont enregistrées, mais sans être prises en compte ni motivées dans les décisions finales. +La troisième pathologie est celle de l'*archicration* fictive, où des +scènes de dispute sont instaurées, mais sans effectivité palpable. Le +dispositif donne l'apparence d'un contradictoire — consultation +publique, boîte à idées, forum participatif, convention citoyenne, droit +de recours — mais en réalité, les conditions de l'opposabilité +demeurent formelles ou insuffisamment opérantes : délais trop courts, +opacité des motifs, non-publication des réponses, filtrage des +revendications, absence de prise sur la décision finale. Cette forme de +mise en scène procédurale produit une illusion de démocratie régulée, où +la scène d'épreuve est ritualisée sans effet. L'*archicration* existe +ici comme spectacle, non comme épreuve, et contribue paradoxalement à +renforcer l'irréversibilité des décisions prises. C'est le cas par +exemple de certaines concertations environnementales menées en urgence, +où les contributions citoyennes sont enregistrées, mais sans être prises +en compte ni motivées dans les décisions finales. -Ces pathologies peuvent en outre se radicaliser lorsque l’un des trois pôles tend à absorber la fonction des deux autres. Une cratialité surpuissante peut ainsi se légitimer par sa seule effectuation ; une arcalité absolutisée peut neutraliser toute possibilité réelle de dispute ; une archicration proliférante peut, à l’inverse, dissoudre l’effectuation dans une sur-opposabilité paralysante. Il ne s’agit pas ici de multiplier les catégories pour elles-mêmes, mais de signaler les formes-limites où la différenciation des pôles cesse d’être tenue, et où la régulation bascule vers l’imposition, l’impuissance ou le simulacre. +Ces pathologies peuvent en outre se radicaliser lorsque l'un des trois +pôles tend à absorber la fonction des deux autres. Une cratialité +surpuissante peut ainsi se légitimer par sa seule effectuation ; une +arcalité absolutisée peut neutraliser toute possibilité réelle de +dispute ; une archicration proliférante peut, à l'inverse, dissoudre +l'effectuation dans une sur-opposabilité paralysante. Il ne s'agit pas +ici de multiplier les catégories pour elles-mêmes, mais de signaler les +formes-limites où la différenciation des pôles cesse d'être tenue, et où +la régulation bascule vers l'imposition, l'impuissance ou le simulacre. -Ces cas limites ne sont pas simplement pathologiques : ils sont heuristiquement structurants. Ils montrent comment l’équilibre entre les pôles ne relève ni d’une essence ni d’une norme, mais d’un jeu d’ajustement toujours instable, toujours à documenter. C’est dans leur désajustement que se révèlent les conditions minimales de viabilité politique d’un dispositif. Car une formation collective peut se maintenir durablement sous déficit d’arcalité, sous atrophie de l’archicration, ou sous affaissement de la cratialité ; mais elle cesse alors d’être un ordre politique pleinement habitable. Elle persiste au prix d’une dégradation de sa co-viabilité, et tend à devenir un régime bloqué de contrainte, de vacance ou d’impuissance. +Ces cas limites ne sont pas simplement pathologiques : ils sont +heuristiquement structurants. Ils montrent comment l'équilibre entre les +pôles ne relève ni d'une essence ni d'une norme, mais d'un jeu +d'ajustement toujours instable, toujours à documenter. C'est dans leur +désajustement que se révèlent les conditions minimales de viabilité +politique d'un dispositif. Car une formation collective peut se +maintenir durablement sous déficit d'arcalité, sous atrophie de +l'archicration, ou sous affaissement de la cratialité ; mais elle cesse +alors d'être un ordre politique pleinement habitable. Elle persiste au +prix d'une dégradation de sa co-viabilité, et tend à devenir un régime +bloqué de contrainte, de vacance ou d'impuissance. -À l’inverse, ces cas-limites valent aussi comme révélateurs d’une exigence positive : ils indiquent, par contraste, ce qu’une tenue archicratique minimale doit préserver pour qu’une régulation demeure habitable, révisable et politiquement soutenable. +À l'inverse, ces cas-limites valent aussi comme révélateurs d'une +exigence positive : ils indiquent, par contraste, ce qu'une tenue +archicratique minimale doit préserver pour qu'une régulation demeure +habitable, révisable et politiquement soutenable. -Enfin, ces déséquilibres ne doivent pas être lus comme des erreurs de conception ou des dysfonctionnements ponctuels. Ils signalent souvent des régimes intentionnels de régulation, où le défaut d’exposition du fondement, la neutralisation de la dispute ou la saturation de l’opération sont stratégiquement construits pour éviter l’épreuve politique. C’est ici que le paradigme archicratique déploie sa force critique : en rendant visibles ces dispositifs qui, tout en étant fonctionnels, se soustraient à la critique, à la comparution, à l’épreuve. +Enfin, ces déséquilibres ne doivent pas être lus comme des erreurs de +conception ou des dysfonctionnements ponctuels. Ils signalent souvent +des régimes intentionnels de régulation, où le défaut d'exposition du +fondement, la neutralisation de la dispute ou la saturation de +l'opération sont stratégiquement construits pour éviter l'épreuve +politique. C'est ici que le paradigme archicratique déploie sa force +critique : en rendant visibles ces dispositifs qui, tout en étant +fonctionnels, se soustraient à la critique, à la comparution, à +l'épreuve. -Mais d’ores et déjà, cette exploration des désajustements initiaux nous permet de poser une hypothèse structurante : une régulation devient politiquement problématique non lorsqu’un pôle manque absolument, mais lorsque ses interactions avec les autres sont rompues, perverties, neutralisées. Ce sont ces configurations, ces bifurcations, ces effets de bascule que l’analyse archicratique doit pouvoir capter, nommer, décrire et critiquer. +Mais d'ores et déjà, cette exploration des désajustements initiaux nous +permet de poser une hypothèse structurante : une régulation devient +politiquement problématique non lorsqu'un pôle manque absolument, mais +lorsque ses interactions avec les autres sont rompues, perverties, +neutralisées. Ce sont ces configurations, ces bifurcations, ces effets +de bascule que l'analyse archicratique doit pouvoir capter, nommer, +décrire et critiquer. ## 1.2 — Statut politique du paradigme archicratique : méta-régime ou catégorie critique ? -Poser un paradigme ne se réduit pas à introduire un outil de lecture, un angle interprétatif ou un cadre d’analyse ; c’est inscrire une thèse dans le champ conflictuel des catégories politiques. Il ne saurait y avoir de paradigme neutre, de grille d’intelligibilité désengagée, de dispositif conceptuel sans enjeu. C’est pourquoi, à ce stade du chapitre, une clarification s’impose : le paradigme archicratique est-il une simple catégorie analytique, un modèle typologique comme tant d’autres — ou engage-t-il une hypothèse plus forte, de type ontologique, politique et structural ? +Poser un paradigme ne se réduit pas à introduire un outil de lecture, un +angle interprétatif ou un cadre d'analyse ; c'est inscrire une thèse +dans le champ conflictuel des catégories politiques. Il ne saurait y +avoir de paradigme neutre, de grille d'intelligibilité désengagée, de +dispositif conceptuel sans enjeu. C'est pourquoi, à ce stade du +chapitre, une clarification s'impose : le paradigme archicratique est-il +une simple catégorie analytique, un modèle typologique comme tant +d'autres — ou engage-t-il une hypothèse plus forte, de type +ontologique, politique et structural ? -Autrement dit : l’archicratie est-elle une simple catégorie analytique, ou engage-t-elle une hypothèse plus forte sur les conditions structurelles de viabilité politique ? Est-elle une forme historique parmi d’autres — ou la qualité régulatoire minimale requise de tout ordre politique légitime ? Peut-elle se superposer à des régimes démocratiques, autoritaires, néolibéraux, théocratiques — ou prétend-elle les traverser, les qualifier, les réorganiser en profondeur selon d’autres lignes de fracture que celles héritées des sciences politiques classiques ? +Autrement dit : l'archicratie est-elle une simple catégorie analytique, +ou engage-t-elle une hypothèse plus forte sur les conditions +structurelles de viabilité politique ? Est-elle une forme historique +parmi d'autres — ou la qualité régulatoire minimale requise de tout +ordre politique légitime ? Peut-elle se superposer à des régimes +démocratiques, autoritaires, néolibéraux, théocratiques — ou +prétend-elle les traverser, les qualifier, les réorganiser en profondeur +selon d'autres lignes de fracture que celles héritées des sciences +politiques classiques ? -Cette question du statut épistémologique et politique du paradigme est décisive. Car si l’*archicratie* n’est qu’un modèle supplémentaire dans la constellation des formes de pouvoir — après la souveraineté, la gouvernance, la gouvernementalité, le management, la régulation — elle n’apporte qu’une lecture parmi d’autres, certes originale, mais substituable. Si, au contraire, elle est conçue comme un méta-régime, alors elle ne se contente pas de décrire une forme : elle propose une nouvelle manière de penser ce qu’est un ordre politique viable, en le définissant non par ses institutions ou ses idéaux, mais par la structure de tension entre fondation, opération et épreuve. +Cette question du statut épistémologique et politique du paradigme est +décisive. Car si l'*archicratie* n'est qu'un modèle supplémentaire dans +la constellation des formes de pouvoir — après la souveraineté, la +gouvernance, la gouvernementalité, le management, la régulation — elle +n'apporte qu'une lecture parmi d'autres, certes originale, mais +substituable. Si, au contraire, elle est conçue comme un méta-régime, +alors elle ne se contente pas de décrire une forme : elle propose une +nouvelle manière de penser ce qu'est un ordre politique viable, en le +définissant non par ses institutions ou ses idéaux, mais par la +structure de tension entre fondation, opération et épreuve. -Nous entrons donc ici dans un moment de clarification paradigmatique : il s’agit de déterminer avec précision le statut de l’archicratie dans l’écologie conceptuelle des sciences politiques et de la philosophie politique, en distinguant successivement les niveaux de régime, de forme et de structure, puis la portée des méta-régimes et les critères de validité du paradigme. Car à la différence d’une idéologie ou d’un modèle de gouvernement, un paradigme n’est pas une prescription ni une utopie : c’est une configuration conceptuelle opératoire, falsifiable, interprétable, transversale. +Nous entrons donc ici dans un moment de clarification paradigmatique : +il s'agit de déterminer avec précision le statut de l'archicratie dans +l'écologie conceptuelle des sciences politiques et de la philosophie +politique, en distinguant successivement les niveaux de régime, de forme +et de structure, puis la portée des méta-régimes et les critères de +validité du paradigme. Car à la différence d'une idéologie ou d'un +modèle de gouvernement, un paradigme n'est pas une prescription ni une +utopie : c'est une configuration conceptuelle opératoire, falsifiable, +interprétable, transversale. -Cette précision appelle toutefois une limitation explicite, sans laquelle la portée du paradigme risquerait d’être surévaluée. L’archicratie n’a pas vocation à devenir une théorie générale de tout phénomène social ni, a fortiori, de toute dynamique du réel. Elle ne vaut qu’à l’intérieur d’un champ déterminé : celui des régulations instituées, médiées, symboliquement ou techniquement relayées, dans lesquelles peuvent être distingués, au moins minimalement, un principe de recevabilité, une prise opératoire et une scène — fût-elle affaiblie, relocalisée ou empêchée — de reprise ou d’épreuve. Là où ces médiations font défaut, là où l’on n’a affaire qu’à des réactions immédiates, à des interactions trop ténues pour engager une co-viabilité structurante, ou à des systèmes formels clos sans scène d’opposabilité, le paradigme ne s’invalide pas : il cesse simplement d’être le bon instrument. Cette borne n’amoindrit pas sa portée ; elle en constitue au contraire la condition de précision. +Cette précision appelle toutefois une limitation explicite, sans +laquelle la portée du paradigme risquerait d'être surévaluée. +L'archicratie n'a pas vocation à devenir une théorie générale de tout +phénomène social ni, a fortiori, de toute dynamique du réel. Elle ne +vaut qu'à l'intérieur d'un champ déterminé : celui des régulations +instituées, médiées, symboliquement ou techniquement relayées, dans +lesquelles peuvent être distingués, au moins minimalement, un principe +de recevabilité, une prise opératoire et une scène — fût-elle +affaiblie, relocalisée ou empêchée — de reprise ou d'épreuve. Là où +ces médiations font défaut, là où l'on n'a affaire qu'à des réactions +immédiates, à des interactions trop ténues pour engager une co-viabilité +structurante, ou à des systèmes formels clos sans scène d'opposabilité, +le paradigme ne s'invalide pas : il cesse simplement d'être le bon +instrument. Cette borne n'amoindrit pas sa portée ; elle en constitue au +contraire la condition de précision. -Et c’est dans cette tension — entre diagnostic et normativité, entre transversalité et historicité, entre critique et cartographie — que le paradigme archicratique doit désormais se situer, pour s’éprouver comme instrument de pensée politique et comme hypothèse heuristique à l’épreuve des chapitres suivants. +Et c'est dans cette tension — entre diagnostic et normativité, entre +transversalité et historicité, entre critique et cartographie — que le +paradigme archicratique doit désormais se situer, pour s'éprouver comme +instrument de pensée politique et comme hypothèse heuristique à +l'épreuve des chapitres suivants. -### 1.2.1 — Régime, forme, structure : clarification des niveaux d’analyse +### 1.2.1 — Régime, forme, structure : clarification des niveaux d'analyse -Pour mesurer la portée du paradigme archicratique, il faut d’abord distinguer trois plans souvent confondus : le régime, la forme et la structure. Penser le politique suppose toujours, à un moment donné, de se situer dans une hiérarchie conceptuelle : à quels niveaux se déploient les régulations ? où s’arrête la description ? où commence l’hypothèse sur leurs conditions de possibilité ? +Pour mesurer la portée du paradigme archicratique, il faut d'abord +distinguer trois plans souvent confondus : le régime, la forme et la +structure. Penser le politique suppose toujours, à un moment donné, de +se situer dans une hiérarchie conceptuelle : à quels niveaux se +déploient les régulations ? où s'arrête la description ? où commence +l'hypothèse sur leurs conditions de possibilité ? -Un régime, au sens classique des sciences politiques (depuis Aristote jusqu’à Linz, Sartori ou Bobbio), désigne un type de gouvernement fondé sur une certaine configuration d’institutions, de normes et de principes de légitimation. Démocratie représentative, monarchie constitutionnelle, autoritarisme plébiscitaire, théocratie — autant de régimes qui décrivent des architectures institutionnelles différenciées, avec leurs acteurs, leurs règles du jeu, leurs modes de reproduction. Le régime est donc un ensemble visible, énonçable, formalisé, que l’on peut inscrire dans une histoire constitutionnelle, un droit positif et une morphologie institutionnelle repérable. +Un régime, au sens classique des sciences politiques (depuis Aristote +jusqu'à Linz, Sartori ou Bobbio), désigne un type de gouvernement fondé +sur une certaine configuration d'institutions, de normes et de principes +de légitimation. Démocratie représentative, monarchie constitutionnelle, +autoritarisme plébiscitaire, théocratie — autant de régimes qui +décrivent des architectures institutionnelles différenciées, avec leurs +acteurs, leurs règles du jeu, leurs modes de reproduction. Le régime est +donc un ensemble visible, énonçable, formalisé, que l'on peut inscrire +dans une histoire constitutionnelle, un droit positif et une morphologie +institutionnelle repérable. -La forme, en revanche, relève d’un niveau intermédiaire. Elle désigne les modalités concrètes par lesquelles un régime opère : centralisation ou fédéralisme, pluralisme ou hégémonie, verticalité ou collégialité, technocratie ou populisme, rationalité procédurale ou charisme personnel. Ces formes sont souvent hybrides, fluctuantes, recombinées. On peut être en démocratie représentative avec une forme technocratique dominante ; on peut être en monarchie constitutionnelle avec des formes participatives. C’est le niveau des régimes effectifs, là où les institutions rencontrent la culture politique, les rapports de force, les usages sociaux. C’est aussi le niveau de l’analyse comparative, des études de cas, des diagnostics empiriques. +La forme, en revanche, relève d'un niveau intermédiaire. Elle désigne +les modalités concrètes par lesquelles un régime opère : centralisation +ou fédéralisme, pluralisme ou hégémonie, verticalité ou collégialité, +technocratie ou populisme, rationalité procédurale ou charisme +personnel. Ces formes sont souvent hybrides, fluctuantes, recombinées. +On peut être en démocratie représentative avec une forme technocratique +dominante ; on peut être en monarchie constitutionnelle avec des formes +participatives. C'est le niveau des régimes effectifs, là où les +institutions rencontrent la culture politique, les rapports de force, +les usages sociaux. C'est aussi le niveau de l'analyse comparative, des +études de cas, des diagnostics empiriques. -Mais en-dessous de ces formes, il y a la structure régulatrice : un plan plus profond, plus transversal, plus déterminant, qui ne désigne ni les institutions ni les pratiques, mais les conditions même de possibilité de la régulation politique. Cette structure est ce qui permet — ou non — qu’un ordre se rende visible, controversable, habitable. Elle ne renvoie pas à une architecture constitutionnelle, mais à une configuration d’agencement entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, et ce qui permet d’en discuter. C’est là que se situe l’hypothèse archicratique : non au niveau des régimes ou des formes, mais au niveau de la structure régulatrice profonde, ce que l’on pourrait appeler, en empruntant à Lévi-Strauss ou à Althusser, un *inconscient politique de la régulation*. +Mais en-dessous de ces formes, il y a la structure régulatrice : un plan +plus profond, plus transversal, plus déterminant, qui ne désigne ni les +institutions ni les pratiques, mais les conditions même de possibilité +de la régulation politique. Cette structure est ce qui permet — ou non — qu'un ordre se rende visible, controversable, habitable. Elle ne +renvoie pas à une architecture constitutionnelle, mais à une +configuration d'agencement entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, et ce qui +permet d'en discuter. C'est là que se situe l'hypothèse archicratique : +non au niveau des régimes ou des formes, mais au niveau de la structure +régulatrice profonde, ce que l'on pourrait appeler, en empruntant à +Lévi-Strauss ou à Althusser, un *inconscient politique de la +régulation*. -L’autarchicratie ne constitue donc pas un régime politique de plus. Elle n’est ni la cousine néolibérale de la démocratie, ni une simple dérive technocratique de l’État-nation. Elle désigne la dérive par laquelle des architectures régulatrices continuent d’opérer tout en se soustrayant progressivement à la scène d’épreuve : les fondements ne disparaissent pas nécessairement, mais deviennent de moins en moins susceptibles d’exposition ; les procédures contradictoires peuvent subsister, mais se vident, se simulent ou deviennent inopérantes ; et la régulation tend à se refermer sur sa propre logique d’exécution. À ce titre, l’autarchicratie peut traverser différents régimes politiques, s’y superposer, y introduire des inerties, des fermetures ou des parasitages silencieux. Un régime peut ainsi être démocratique en apparence, tout en dérivant vers une structure opératoire autarchicratique. Inversement, certaines formes autoritaires peuvent encore ménager des archicrations ponctuelles, permettant le maintien d’une conflictualité politique minimale. C’est ce qui rend l’autarchicratie difficile à identifier, et pourtant nécessaire à penser : elle ne se lit pas seulement dans les institutions, mais dans la manière dont un ordre rend — ou non — sa régulation exposable, opposable, différable et révisable. +L'autarchicratie ne constitue donc pas un régime politique de plus. Elle +n'est ni la cousine néolibérale de la démocratie, ni une simple dérive +technocratique de l'État-nation. Elle désigne la dérive par laquelle des +architectures régulatrices continuent d'opérer tout en se soustrayant +progressivement à la scène d'épreuve : les fondements ne disparaissent +pas nécessairement, mais deviennent de moins en moins susceptibles +d'exposition ; les procédures contradictoires peuvent subsister, mais se +vident, se simulent ou deviennent inopérantes ; et la régulation tend à +se refermer sur sa propre logique d'exécution. À ce titre, +l'autarchicratie peut traverser différents régimes politiques, s'y +superposer, y introduire des inerties, des fermetures ou des parasitages +silencieux. Un régime peut ainsi être démocratique en apparence, tout en +dérivant vers une structure opératoire autarchicratique. Inversement, +certaines formes autoritaires peuvent encore ménager des archicrations +ponctuelles, permettant le maintien d'une conflictualité politique +minimale. C'est ce qui rend l'autarchicratie difficile à identifier, et +pourtant nécessaire à penser : elle ne se lit pas seulement dans les +institutions, mais dans la manière dont un ordre rend — ou non — sa +régulation exposable, opposable, différable et révisable. -Cette distinction entre régime, forme, et structure n’est pas simplement académique. Elle est politiquement décisive. Car c’est elle qui permet d’éviter deux écueils fréquents : le fétichisme institutionnel (croire qu’un régime démocratique suffit à garantir une régulation juste), et le scepticisme cynique (penser que toute régulation est toujours déjà close, dominée, irréformable). L’*archicratie* introduit un plan d’analyse transversal, qui oblige à questionner non ce que les institutions prétendent, mais ce qu’elles permettent réellement en termes de fondement, d’opération, et de dispute. Elle ouvre une lecture différentielle du politique, fondée non sur l’étiquette (démocratie ou non), mais sur la qualité régulatrice de l’ordre. +Cette distinction entre régime, forme, et structure n'est pas simplement +académique. Elle est politiquement décisive. Car c'est elle qui permet +d'éviter deux écueils fréquents : le fétichisme institutionnel (croire +qu'un régime démocratique suffit à garantir une régulation juste), et le +scepticisme cynique (penser que toute régulation est toujours déjà +close, dominée, irréformable). L'*archicratie* introduit un plan +d'analyse transversal, qui oblige à questionner non ce que les +institutions prétendent, mais ce qu'elles permettent réellement en +termes de fondement, d'opération, et de dispute. Elle ouvre une lecture +différentielle du politique, fondée non sur l'étiquette (démocratie ou +non), mais sur la qualité régulatrice de l'ordre. -En clarifiant ce niveau d’analyse, on peut désormais définir l’*archicratie* non plus comme catégorie critique isolée, mais comme *méta-régime* — c’est-à-dire comme grille d’intelligibilité transversale, permettant d’évaluer la robustesse ou la fragilité politique d’un ordre, quel que soit son étiquetage institutionnel. +En clarifiant ce niveau d'analyse, on peut désormais définir +l'*archicratie* non plus comme catégorie critique isolée, mais comme +*méta-régime* — c'est-à-dire comme grille d'intelligibilité +transversale, permettant d'évaluer la robustesse ou la fragilité +politique d'un ordre, quel que soit son étiquetage institutionnel. -### 1.2.2 — L’archicratie comme méta-régime transversal de la régulation +### 1.2.2 — L'archicratie comme méta-régime transversal de la régulation -Comme nous l’avons établi, l’archicratie n’est pas un type de régime politique au sens classique du terme. Elle n’est ni une démocratie, ni une autocratie, ni une technocratie, ni une bureaucratie au sens formel. Elle n’est pas définie par un mode d’accès au pouvoir, une forme de représentation, ou une structure constitutionnelle donnée. Elle ne se substitue pas aux régimes : elle les traverse, les reconfigure, parfois les parasite ou les redouble. Ce que le paradigme archicratique propose, ce n’est donc pas d’ajouter une étiquette à la typologie déjà saturée des formes politiques, mais de formuler une hypothèse forte sur la structure profonde qui rend possible — ou impossible — la régulation politique dans ses dimensions fondamentales. +Comme nous l'avons établi, l'archicratie n'est pas un type de régime +politique au sens classique du terme. Elle n'est ni une démocratie, ni +une autocratie, ni une technocratie, ni une bureaucratie au sens formel. +Elle n'est pas définie par un mode d'accès au pouvoir, une forme de +représentation, ou une structure constitutionnelle donnée. Elle ne se +substitue pas aux régimes : elle les traverse, les reconfigure, parfois +les parasite ou les redouble. Ce que le paradigme archicratique propose, +ce n'est donc pas d'ajouter une étiquette à la typologie déjà saturée +des formes politiques, mais de formuler une hypothèse forte sur la +structure profonde qui rend possible — ou impossible — la régulation +politique dans ses dimensions fondamentales. -C’est en ce sens que nous définissons l’*archicratie comme un méta-régime de régulation*. +C'est en ce sens que nous définissons l'*archicratie comme un +méta-régime de régulation*. -Un méta-régime n’est pas une catégorie de surface. Il ne désigne pas un type d’organisation institutionnelle, ni même un modèle de gouvernement parmi d’autres. Il opère à un niveau plus profond : celui des conditions de possibilité de la régulation, celui de l’articulation — ou de la disjonction — entre les trois dimensions constitutives que nous avons décrites : l’*arcalité* (fondement), la *cratialité* (opération), et l’*archicration* (épreuve). Là où les régimes désignent des structures politiques historiquement repérables, le méta-régime désigne la manière dont ces structures rendent (ou non) leurs propres régulations exposables à la contradiction, à la reprise et à la révision. +Un méta-régime n'est pas une catégorie de surface. Il ne désigne pas un +type d'organisation institutionnelle, ni même un modèle de gouvernement +parmi d'autres. Il opère à un niveau plus profond : celui des conditions +de possibilité de la régulation, celui de l'articulation — ou de la +disjonction — entre les trois dimensions constitutives que nous avons +décrites : l'*arcalité* (fondement), la *cratialité* (opération), et +l'*archicration* (épreuve). Là où les régimes désignent des structures +politiques historiquement repérables, le méta-régime désigne la manière +dont ces structures rendent (ou non) leurs propres régulations +exposables à la contradiction, à la reprise et à la révision. -Dit autrement, un *méta-régime* n’est pas une forme politique particulière, mais un *rapport entre les formes, un agencement systémique entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui rend opposable*. Il ne se lit pas dans les discours publics, ni même dans les textes constitutionnels : il se repère dans la cohérence (ou l’incohérence) d’un dispositif de régulation. Ce que propose le paradigme archicratique, c’est donc un analyseur transversal des états de régulation dans toute configuration politique donnée, en interrogeant non pas leur légalité ou leur conformité, mais leur tenue archicrative effective. +Dit autrement, un *méta-régime* n'est pas une forme politique +particulière, mais un *rapport entre les formes, un agencement +systémique entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui rend opposable*. +Il ne se lit pas dans les discours publics, ni même dans les textes +constitutionnels : il se repère dans la cohérence (ou l'incohérence) +d'un dispositif de régulation. Ce que propose le paradigme +archicratique, c'est donc un analyseur transversal des états de +régulation dans toute configuration politique donnée, en interrogeant +non pas leur légalité ou leur conformité, mais leur tenue archicrative +effective. -Cette grille permet par exemple de comparer un dispositif d’allocation d’aides sociales dans une démocratie représentative, un protocole sanitaire dans une dictature *soft*, ou un mécanisme d’ajustement budgétaire dans une structure supra-étatique. Ce qui compte, ce n’est pas l’étiquette politique du régime, mais la qualité de sa régulation au regard des trois critères fondamentaux : le fondement mobilisé (*arcalité*), les moyens d’effectuation (*cratialité*), et les possibilités instituées de contestation (*archicration*). L’*archicratie* devient ainsi un analyseur paradigmatique, c’est-à-dire une manière de lire des dispositifs en détectant ce qui s’y fonde, ce qui y opère, et ce qui s’y dispute — ou non. +Cette grille permet par exemple de comparer un dispositif d'allocation +d'aides sociales dans une démocratie représentative, un protocole +sanitaire dans une dictature *soft*, ou un mécanisme d'ajustement +budgétaire dans une structure supra-étatique. Ce qui compte, ce n'est +pas l'étiquette politique du régime, mais la qualité de sa régulation au +regard des trois critères fondamentaux : le fondement mobilisé +(*arcalité*), les moyens d'effectuation (*cratialité*), et les +possibilités instituées de contestation (*archicration*). +L'*archicratie* devient ainsi un analyseur paradigmatique, c'est-à-dire +une manière de lire des dispositifs en détectant ce qui s'y fonde, ce +qui y opère, et ce qui s'y dispute — ou non. -Cette approche n’est pas purement descriptive. Elle est diagnostique, critique, opposable. Elle permet de dire : « ici, l’ordre régulateur semble robuste, mais il fonctionne désormais sur un mode autarchicratique, en ce qu’il devient indisputable » ; ou bien : « ce dispositif mobilise un fondement fort, mais sa cratialité se déploie avec un contrôle affaibli et une scène de recours neutralisée, comprimée ou rendue pratiquement inopérante ». En ce sens, l’archicratie n’est pas un concept mollement critique : elle est une épreuve conceptuelle pour les régimes existants, un test de viabilité politique, une mise à nu des écarts entre l’invocation des principes et la structure réelle de la régulation. +Cette approche n'est pas purement descriptive. Elle est diagnostique, +critique, opposable. Elle permet de dire : « ici, l'ordre régulateur +semble robuste, mais il fonctionne désormais sur un mode +autarchicratique, en ce qu'il devient indisputable » ; ou bien : « ce +dispositif mobilise un fondement fort, mais sa cratialité se déploie +avec un contrôle affaibli et une scène de recours neutralisée, comprimée +ou rendue pratiquement inopérante ». En ce sens, l'archicratie n'est pas +un concept mollement critique : elle est une épreuve conceptuelle pour +les régimes existants, un test de viabilité politique, une mise à nu des +écarts entre l'invocation des principes et la structure réelle de la +régulation. -Mais surtout, cette conceptualisation du *méta-régime archicratique* permet de dépasser deux impasses majeures des théories politiques classiques. La première, *normative*, qui suppose qu’un régime est légitime parce qu’il respecte formellement certaines règles (élections, séparation des pouvoirs, État de droit). Or, ces règles peuvent subsister tandis que la régulation réelle devient opaque, automatique ou imperméable à la contestation. +Mais surtout, cette conceptualisation du *méta-régime archicratique* +permet de dépasser deux impasses majeures des théories politiques +classiques. La première, *normative*, qui suppose qu'un régime est +légitime parce qu'il respecte formellement certaines règles (élections, +séparation des pouvoirs, État de droit). Or, ces règles peuvent +subsister tandis que la régulation réelle devient opaque, automatique ou +imperméable à la contestation. -La seconde, que nous nommons *contextualisée*, qui affirme que chaque régime porte sa cohérence interne, ses normes propres, son rythme historique. Certes. Mais le paradigme archicratique montre que certaines tensions traversent tous les régimes : celle entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, et ce qui conteste. Et que c’est dans cette tension que se joue la co-viabilité politique réelle d’un ordre. +La seconde, que nous nommons *contextualisée*, qui affirme que chaque +régime porte sa cohérence interne, ses normes propres, son rythme +historique. Certes. Mais le paradigme archicratique montre que certaines +tensions traversent tous les régimes : celle entre ce qui fonde, ce qui +opère, et ce qui conteste. Et que c'est dans cette tension que se joue +la co-viabilité politique réelle d'un ordre. -En ce sens, on peut dire que le paradigme archicratique relève d’une démarche post-wébérienne : il ne cherche pas à classer les régimes d’autorité selon des types idéaux de légitimation (traditionnelle, charismatique, légale-rationnelle), mais à analyser les conditions concrètes de l’opposabilité des régulations, indépendamment de leurs formes déclarées. Il reformule la question du pouvoir non en termes de commandement, mais en termes de co-présence entre les dimensions de fondation, d’effectuation, et de mise en épreuve. +En ce sens, on peut dire que le paradigme archicratique relève d'une +démarche post-wébérienne : il ne cherche pas à classer les régimes +d'autorité selon des types idéaux de légitimation (traditionnelle, +charismatique, légale-rationnelle), mais à analyser les conditions +concrètes de l'opposabilité des régulations, indépendamment de leurs +formes déclarées. Il reformule la question du pouvoir non en termes de +commandement, mais en termes de co-présence entre les dimensions de +fondation, d'effectuation, et de mise en épreuve. -C’est cette transversalité — au-delà des régimes, des époques, des configurations — qui fonde l’*archicratie* comme méta-régime analytique. Elle ne se substitue pas aux typologies existantes, mais les traverse. Elle n’invalide pas les concepts de démocratie, d’État, de représentation, mais les reconfigure en introduisant une dimension de *régulation par tensions de co-viabilité*. +C'est cette transversalité — au-delà des régimes, des époques, des +configurations — qui fonde l'*archicratie* comme méta-régime +analytique. Elle ne se substitue pas aux typologies existantes, mais les +traverse. Elle n'invalide pas les concepts de démocratie, d'État, de +représentation, mais les reconfigure en introduisant une dimension de +*régulation par tensions de co-viabilité*. -Pour cette raison, l’archicratie peut être mobilisée à la fois comme hypothèse heuristique, comme outil critique, et comme cadre de diagnostic différentiel. Elle ne prétend pas tout expliquer, mais elle permet de poser cette question décisive : *dans un régime donné, qui peut invoquer quoi ? Qui peut agir sur quoi ? Qui peut contester quoi ? Et selon quelles formes, sous quels délais, avec quelle effectivité ?* +Pour cette raison, l'archicratie peut être mobilisée à la fois comme +hypothèse heuristique, comme outil critique, et comme cadre de +diagnostic différentiel. Elle ne prétend pas tout expliquer, mais elle +permet de poser cette question décisive : *dans un régime donné, qui +peut invoquer quoi ? Qui peut agir sur quoi ? Qui peut contester quoi ? +Et selon quelles formes, sous quels délais, avec quelle effectivité ?* -Encore faut-il préciser ce que signifie ici l’effectivité. Une scène d’archicration ne saurait être dite réelle du seul fait qu’un recours, une procédure ou une adresse existent nominalement. Il faut, à un seuil minimal, que quatre conditions soient réunies : que l’accès à la scène ne soit pas matériellement prohibitif ; que les motifs de décision soient suffisamment intelligibles pour autoriser une reprise ; qu’un différé non fictif permette la contestation ou la révision ; et qu’une transformation effective du cours de la décision demeure, en droit comme en pratique, au moins possible. +Encore faut-il préciser ce que signifie ici l'effectivité. Une scène +d'archicration ne saurait être dite réelle du seul fait qu'un recours, +une procédure ou une adresse existent nominalement. Il faut, à un seuil +minimal, que quatre conditions soient réunies : que l'accès à la scène +ne soit pas matériellement prohibitif ; que les motifs de décision +soient suffisamment intelligibles pour autoriser une reprise ; qu'un +différé non fictif permette la contestation ou la révision ; et qu'une +transformation effective du cours de la décision demeure, en droit comme +en pratique, au moins possible. -Ces quatre conditions doivent être entendues comme conjointement requises au seuil plein de l’archicration effective. Elles ne relèvent pas pour autant d’un tout-ou-rien mécanique : chacune peut être satisfaite à des degrés variables, et c’est précisément cette variation qui permet de distinguer une scène pleinement praticable d’une scène dégradée, simulée ou empêchée. Mais aucune n’est substituable aux autres : l’intelligibilité des motifs ne compense pas l’impossibilité matérielle d’accès ; l’existence d’un recours ne compense pas l’absence de différé réel ; et la publicité d’une procédure ne vaut pas effectivité si aucune transformation du cours de la décision ne demeure possible. +Ces quatre conditions doivent être entendues comme conjointement +requises au seuil plein de l'archicration effective. Elles ne relèvent +pas pour autant d'un tout-ou-rien mécanique : chacune peut être +satisfaite à des degrés variables, et c'est précisément cette variation +qui permet de distinguer une scène pleinement praticable d'une scène +dégradée, simulée ou empêchée. Mais aucune n'est substituable aux autres +: l'intelligibilité des motifs ne compense pas l'impossibilité +matérielle d'accès ; l'existence d'un recours ne compense pas l'absence +de différé réel ; et la publicité d'une procédure ne vaut pas +effectivité si aucune transformation du cours de la décision ne demeure +possible. -Là où ces conditions sont formellement affichées mais pratiquement neutralisées, il ne s’agit pas d’archicration au sens plein, mais d’une scène dégradée, simulée ou empêchée. Cette distinction sera décisive pour ne pas confondre l’existence décorative des formes avec leur consistance régulatrice réelle. +Là où ces conditions sont formellement affichées mais pratiquement +neutralisées, il ne s'agit pas d'archicration au sens plein, mais d'une +scène dégradée, simulée ou empêchée. Cette distinction sera décisive +pour ne pas confondre l'existence décorative des formes avec leur +consistance régulatrice réelle. -Ce déplacement suffit à fixer le statut du paradigme. L’archicratie ne désigne pas une forme institutionnelle supplémentaire, mais le plan de régulation à partir duquel des formes politiques hétérogènes deviennent comparables quant à leur tenue, leur opposabilité et leur viabilité. Elle ne concurrence donc pas les typologies classiques ; elle en déplace le foyer d’analyse. +Ce déplacement suffit à fixer le statut du paradigme. L'archicratie ne +désigne pas une forme institutionnelle supplémentaire, mais le plan de +régulation à partir duquel des formes politiques hétérogènes deviennent +comparables quant à leur tenue, leur opposabilité et leur viabilité. +Elle ne concurrence donc pas les typologies classiques ; elle en déplace +le foyer d'analyse. -Elle n’est pas une langue souveraine du politique, mais un cadre d’analyse dont la validité dépend du différentiel d’intelligibilité qu’il produit effectivement. Autrement dit : le pouvoir régule — mais est-il régulé ? Et, si ce n’est pas le cas, où est passée la scène ? +Elle n'est pas une langue souveraine du politique, mais un cadre +d'analyse dont la validité dépend du différentiel d'intelligibilité +qu'il produit effectivement. Autrement dit : le pouvoir régule — mais +est-il régulé ? Et, si ce n'est pas le cas, où est passée la scène ? ### 1.2.3 — Les critères de validité paradigmatique : fécondité, puissance et opposabilité -Un paradigme n’est légitime que s’il rend visible ce qui demeurait obscurci, dispersé ou neutralisé, tout en s’exposant lui-même à la critique, à la vérification et, le cas échéant, à la réfutation. +Un paradigme n'est légitime que s'il rend visible ce qui demeurait +obscurci, dispersé ou neutralisé, tout en s'exposant lui-même à la +critique, à la vérification et, le cas échéant, à la réfutation. -Trois conditions principales structurent cette exigence de validité : la fécondité analytique, la puissance explicative, et surtout l’opposabilité empirique — cette dernière constituant le seuil le plus élevé de toute ambition théorique sérieuse. En cela, la validité paradigmatique ne relève ni du consensus idéologique, ni de la cohérence formelle interne : elle engage une éthique épistémique, un devoir de rigueur, un engagement de réfutabilité qui doit orienter l’ensemble de notre construction. +Trois conditions principales structurent cette exigence de validité : la +fécondité analytique, la puissance explicative, et surtout +l'opposabilité empirique — cette dernière constituant le seuil le plus +élevé de toute ambition théorique sérieuse. En cela, la validité +paradigmatique ne relève ni du consensus idéologique, ni de la cohérence +formelle interne : elle engage une éthique épistémique, un devoir de +rigueur, un engagement de réfutabilité qui doit orienter l'ensemble de +notre construction. -Mais une telle revendication de validité resterait déclarative si elle ne précisait pas les conditions de son propre échec. En effet, le paradigme archicratique ne vaut qu’à la condition de pouvoir être mis en défaut. Il doit donc être possible d’indiquer, au moins en principe, ce qui l’infirmerait, ce qui limiterait sa portée, ou ce qui contraindrait à le réviser. Plusieurs cas doivent ici être explicitement distingués. +Mais une telle revendication de validité resterait déclarative si elle +ne précisait pas les conditions de son propre échec. En effet, le +paradigme archicratique ne vaut qu'à la condition de pouvoir être mis en +défaut. Il doit donc être possible d'indiquer, au moins en principe, ce +qui l'infirmerait, ce qui limiterait sa portée, ou ce qui contraindrait +à le réviser. Plusieurs cas doivent ici être explicitement distingués. -Le premier cas d’invalidation serait celui d’un dispositif dans lequel aucune différenciation praticable entre fondement, opération et épreuve ne pourrait être établie autrement que par projection arbitraire de l’analyste. Si la triade n’ajoute aucune intelligibilité, si elle ne produit aucune distinction supplémentaire, si elle ne permet pas de reconstruire plus finement le fonctionnement du dispositif qu’une description ordinaire, alors le paradigme échoue dans ce cas précis. +Le premier cas d'invalidation serait celui d'un dispositif dans lequel +aucune différenciation praticable entre fondement, opération et épreuve +ne pourrait être établie autrement que par projection arbitraire de +l'analyste. Si la triade n'ajoute aucune intelligibilité, si elle ne +produit aucune distinction supplémentaire, si elle ne permet pas de +reconstruire plus finement le fonctionnement du dispositif qu'une +description ordinaire, alors le paradigme échoue dans ce cas précis. -Le deuxième cas serait celui d’une confusion durable entre absence réelle d’un pôle et simple défaut documentaire. Qu’une scène d’épreuve ne soit pas immédiatement visible ne signifie pas qu’elle soit inexistante ; qu’un fondement soit tacite ne signifie pas qu’il soit nul ; qu’une opération soit distribuée ne signifie pas qu’elle soit indéterminable. Le paradigme ne doit donc jamais transformer une difficulté d’enquête en preuve doctrinale. Il oblige, au contraire, à distinguer entre pôle absent, pôle faible, pôle empêché, pôle simulé, pôle relocalisé ou pôle provisoirement non documenté. +Le deuxième cas serait celui d'une confusion durable entre absence +réelle d'un pôle et simple défaut documentaire. Qu'une scène d'épreuve +ne soit pas immédiatement visible ne signifie pas qu'elle soit +inexistante ; qu'un fondement soit tacite ne signifie pas qu'il soit nul +; qu'une opération soit distribuée ne signifie pas qu'elle soit +indéterminable. Le paradigme ne doit donc jamais transformer une +difficulté d'enquête en preuve doctrinale. Il oblige, au contraire, à +distinguer entre pôle absent, pôle faible, pôle empêché, pôle simulé, +pôle relocalisé ou pôle provisoirement non documenté. -Le troisième cas d’échec serait celui d’un usage inflationniste où toute régulation, parce qu’elle agit, serait aussitôt réputée relever d’une dérive autarchicratique. Une telle généralisation viderait le paradigme de sa force différentielle. L’intérêt de l’archicratie n’est pas de tout dénoncer indistinctement, mais de qualifier des écarts, des degrés, des tensions, des bifurcations, des formes variables de tenue ou de désajustement. +Le troisième cas d'échec serait celui d'un usage inflationniste où toute +régulation, parce qu'elle agit, serait aussitôt réputée relever d'une +dérive autarchicratique. Une telle généralisation viderait le paradigme +de sa force différentielle. L'intérêt de l'archicratie n'est pas de tout +dénoncer indistinctement, mais de qualifier des écarts, des degrés, des +tensions, des bifurcations, des formes variables de tenue ou de +désajustement. -Il faut aller plus loin encore. Le paradigme peut échouer non seulement lorsqu’il projette arbitrairement sa triade sur un matériau rétif ; mais également lorsqu’il ne procure aucun gain différentiel d’intelligibilité par rapport à des cadres concurrents plus sobres ou plus précis. Si une micro-interaction ordinaire est mieux élucidée par l’ethnométhodologie, si une formalisation logique se laisse décrire de manière exhaustive dans son ordre propre sans qu’intervienne aucune scène de co-viabilité, si une séquence historique particulière est plus rigoureusement expliquée par l’histoire du droit, l’économie politique ou l’anthropologie sans qu’une lecture archicratique n’en augmente la puissance de discernement, alors il faut savoir suspendre l’usage du paradigme. Une théorie ne gagne pas en dignité en s’appliquant partout ; elle en gagne lorsqu’elle sait reconnaître les terrains où sa plus-value devient marginale, nulle voire dérisoire. +Il faut aller plus loin encore. Le paradigme peut échouer non seulement +lorsqu'il projette arbitrairement sa triade sur un matériau rétif ; mais +également lorsqu'il ne procure aucun gain différentiel d'intelligibilité +par rapport à des cadres concurrents plus sobres ou plus précis. Si une +micro-interaction ordinaire est mieux élucidée par l'ethnométhodologie, +si une formalisation logique se laisse décrire de manière exhaustive +dans son ordre propre sans qu'intervienne aucune scène de co-viabilité, +si une séquence historique particulière est plus rigoureusement +expliquée par l'histoire du droit, l'économie politique ou +l'anthropologie sans qu'une lecture archicratique n'en augmente la +puissance de discernement, alors il faut savoir suspendre l'usage du +paradigme. Une théorie ne gagne pas en dignité en s'appliquant partout ; +elle en gagne lorsqu'elle sait reconnaître les terrains où sa plus-value +devient marginale, nulle voire dérisoire. -Enfin, le paradigme doit pouvoir rencontrer des cas mixtes, ambivalents, résistants, voire contradictoires, dans lesquels certains pôles demeurent robustes alors que d’autres se dégradent. C’est même à cette condition qu’il cesse d’être un schème qui pourrait sembler dogmatique pour devenir un puissant instrument d’enquête. Sa robustesse ne se mesure donc pas à sa capacité à tout absorber, mais à sa capacité à discriminer sans simplifier, à nuancer sans dissoudre, à être contredit sans s’effondrer entièrement. C’est à cette condition qu’une fécondité analytique cesse d’être une simple promesse pour devenir une ressource réellement probante. +Enfin, le paradigme doit pouvoir rencontrer des cas mixtes, ambivalents, +résistants, voire contradictoires, dans lesquels certains pôles +demeurent robustes alors que d'autres se dégradent. C'est même à cette +condition qu'il cesse d'être un schème qui pourrait sembler dogmatique +pour devenir un puissant instrument d'enquête. Sa robustesse ne se +mesure donc pas à sa capacité à tout absorber, mais à sa capacité à +discriminer sans simplifier, à nuancer sans dissoudre, à être contredit +sans s'effondrer entièrement. C'est à cette condition qu'une fécondité +analytique cesse d'être une simple promesse pour devenir une ressource +réellement probante. #### Une fécondité analytique : produire des distinctions et ouvrir des intelligibilités -La première exigence que doit remplir un paradigme est de produire une nouvelle grammaire du réel. Non pas un surcroît de concepts, mais une capacité à engendrer des distinctions opératoires, à rendre discernables des dynamiques qui échappaient jusqu’ici aux outils d’analyse disponibles. Un paradigme est valide lorsqu’il élargit la cartographie du pensable, lorsqu’il trace des lignes de crête dans les zones floues, lorsqu’il permet de négocier avec la complexité sans céder à la confusion. +La première exigence que doit remplir un paradigme est de produire une +nouvelle grammaire du réel. Non pas un surcroît de concepts, mais une +capacité à engendrer des distinctions opératoires, à rendre discernables +des dynamiques qui échappaient jusqu'ici aux outils d'analyse +disponibles. Un paradigme est valide lorsqu'il élargit la cartographie +du pensable, lorsqu'il trace des lignes de crête dans les zones floues, +lorsqu'il permet de négocier avec la complexité sans céder à la +confusion. -En ce sens, le paradigme archicratique s’avère fécond : il introduit des distinctions inédites qui viennent enrichir, affiner, complexifier, mais aussi clarifier l’analyse des dispositifs de pouvoir contemporains. Là où les grilles classiques distinguaient les régimes par leur degré de souveraineté, leur forme institutionnelle ou leur niveau de centralisation, le paradigme archicratique propose une lecture en termes de tenue de régulation : ce qui compte n’est plus uniquement *qui gouverne* ou *selon quelle forme*, mais comment la mise en débat se compose, s’opère et se dispute. En cela, il introduit des disjonctions conceptuelles d’une acuité nouvelle entre : légitimité fondatrice et capacité opératoire ; forme déclarée et opérativité réelle ; dispositif d’autorité et scène de contestation ; régulation déclarée et absence d’épreuve. +En ce sens, le paradigme archicratique s'avère fécond : il introduit des +distinctions inédites qui viennent enrichir, affiner, complexifier, mais +aussi clarifier l'analyse des dispositifs de pouvoir contemporains. Là +où les grilles classiques distinguaient les régimes par leur degré de +souveraineté, leur forme institutionnelle ou leur niveau de +centralisation, le paradigme archicratique propose une lecture en termes +de tenue de régulation : ce qui compte n'est plus uniquement *qui +gouverne* ou *selon quelle forme*, mais comment la mise en débat se +compose, s'opère et se dispute. En cela, il introduit des disjonctions +conceptuelles d'une acuité nouvelle entre : légitimité fondatrice et +capacité opératoire ; forme déclarée et opérativité réelle ; dispositif +d'autorité et scène de contestation ; régulation déclarée et absence +d'épreuve. -Il devient ainsi possible, grâce à cette grille tripolaire, de qualifier des régulations auparavant dissimulées dans le flou institutionnel, euphémisées dans les discours technocratiques ou naturalisées dans les routines bureaucratiques. +Il devient ainsi possible, grâce à cette grille tripolaire, de qualifier +des régulations auparavant dissimulées dans le flou institutionnel, +euphémisées dans les discours technocratiques ou naturalisées dans les +routines bureaucratiques. #### Une puissance explicative : relier des phénomènes épars et construire une cohérence interprétative -Mais encore faut-il que le paradigme soit explicatif, c’est-à-dire capable de rapprocher des phénomènes épars, de construire des séries intelligibles, de réduire la contingence apparente à des configurations discernables. Là encore, le paradigme archicratique s’impose par sa puissance intégratrice : il permet d’embrasser dans une même grille d’analyse des réalités qui, jusque-là, semblaient hétérogènes — parce que dispersées dans des domaines sectoriels (fiscalité, santé, climat, numérique, sécurité), ou parce qu’enveloppées dans des langages spécialisés (juridique, économique, algorithmique). +Mais encore faut-il que le paradigme soit explicatif, c'est-à-dire +capable de rapprocher des phénomènes épars, de construire des séries +intelligibles, de réduire la contingence apparente à des configurations +discernables. Là encore, le paradigme archicratique s'impose par sa +puissance intégratrice : il permet d'embrasser dans une même grille +d'analyse des réalités qui, jusque-là, semblaient hétérogènes — parce +que dispersées dans des domaines sectoriels (fiscalité, santé, climat, +numérique, sécurité), ou parce qu'enveloppées dans des langages +spécialisés (juridique, économique, algorithmique). -C’est précisément cette capacité à unifier sans uniformiser, à articuler sans réduire, qui signe la force d’un paradigme. En *archicratie*, des phénomènes aussi variés que — la gouvernance sanitaire par indicateurs ; la régulation budgétaire par règles automatiques ; la gestion algorithmique des droits sociaux ; l’application de standards techniques globaux sans discussion locale ; ou encore la prolifération des plateformes numériques de notification unilatérale — peuvent être reliés, compris, comparés à l’aune d’une même question : *cette régulation est-elle fondée, opérante et opposable ?* Si l’un de ces trois pôles fait défaut, la régulation devient fragile, injustifiable ou autoritaire. Ainsi, ce que le paradigme archicratique rend possible, c’est une lecture transversale, critique, intersectorielle du politique contemporain — non plus à partir des formes visibles de pouvoir, mais à partir de ses pratiques effectives de régulation, de ses vecteurs techniques, et de ses seuils de dispute. +C'est précisément cette capacité à unifier sans uniformiser, à articuler +sans réduire, qui signe la force d'un paradigme. En *archicratie*, des +phénomènes aussi variés que — la gouvernance sanitaire par indicateurs +; la régulation budgétaire par règles automatiques ; la gestion +algorithmique des droits sociaux ; l'application de standards techniques +globaux sans discussion locale ; ou encore la prolifération des +plateformes numériques de notification unilatérale — peuvent être +reliés, compris, comparés à l'aune d'une même question : *cette +régulation est-elle fondée, opérante et opposable ?* Si l'un de ces +trois pôles fait défaut, la régulation devient fragile, injustifiable ou +autoritaire. Ainsi, ce que le paradigme archicratique rend possible, +c'est une lecture transversale, critique, intersectorielle du politique +contemporain — non plus à partir des formes visibles de pouvoir, mais +à partir de ses pratiques effectives de régulation, de ses vecteurs +techniques, et de ses seuils de dispute. #### Une opposabilité empirique : falsifiabilité, indicateurs et critères de lecture -Mais la dimension décisive demeure l’opposabilité empirique : car un paradigme qui ne peut pas être contesté, ni mis en défaut, ni éprouvé à partir de cas concrets, est un dogme et non une théorie. À ce titre, le paradigme archicratique doit accepter d’être testé, confronté, réfuté, sur des objets situés. Et pour cela, il doit s’équiper d’une série de critères d’identification, de balises de vérification, de conditions de falsifiabilité qui permettent de dire, devant un cas concret : « ce dispositif est archicratique », ou bien « il ne l’est pas ». +Mais la dimension décisive demeure l'opposabilité empirique : car un +paradigme qui ne peut pas être contesté, ni mis en défaut, ni éprouvé à +partir de cas concrets, est un dogme et non une théorie. À ce titre, le +paradigme archicratique doit accepter d'être testé, confronté, réfuté, +sur des objets situés. Et pour cela, il doit s'équiper d'une série de +critères d'identification, de balises de vérification, de conditions de +falsifiabilité qui permettent de dire, devant un cas concret : « ce +dispositif est archicratique », ou bien « il ne l'est pas ». -Ces critères sont au nombre de quatre, que nous avons déjà évoqués en filigrane, mais qu’il faut ici poser avec rigueur : +Ces critères sont au nombre de quatre, que nous avons déjà évoqués en +filigrane, mais qu'il faut ici poser avec rigueur : -- La *présence d’une scène effective de délibération*, de contestation ou de décision visible : une instance réelle, et non mimée, où les décisions sont discutées, justifiées, révisées. +- La *présence d'une scène effective de délibération*, de contestation + ou de décision visible : une instance réelle, et non mimée, où les + décisions sont discutées, justifiées, révisées. -- L’*existence de délais appropriés* entre production de la norme et son application : délais de réflexion, d’interpellation, de contradiction. L’absence ou la suppression de ces délais signe souvent l’entrée dans la précipitation archicratique. +- L'*existence de délais appropriés* entre production de la norme et son + application : délais de réflexion, d'interpellation, de contradiction. + L'absence ou la suppression de ces délais signe souvent l'entrée dans + la précipitation archicratique. -- La *motivation des décisions* : tout acte de régulation doit être accompagné d’un énoncé explicite des motifs qui le soutiennent. Là où les motifs sont remplacés par des chiffres, des tableaux de bord, ou des injonctions automatisées, la scène politique se dissout. +- La *motivation des décisions* : tout acte de régulation doit être + accompagné d'un énoncé explicite des motifs qui le soutiennent. Là où + les motifs sont remplacés par des chiffres, des tableaux de bord, ou + des injonctions automatisées, la scène politique se dissout. -- La *possibilité de recours effectif* : une norme est politique si elle peut être contestée dans un délai raisonnable, devant une instance compétente, selon une procédure intelligible et des modalités non excluantes. Le formalisme du recours ne suffit pas ; c’est sa praticabilité qui importe. +- La *possibilité de recours effectif* : une norme est politique si elle + peut être contestée dans un délai raisonnable, devant une instance + compétente, selon une procédure intelligible et des modalités non + excluantes. Le formalisme du recours ne suffit pas ; c'est sa + praticabilité qui importe. -Ces quatre indicateurs peuvent être mesurés, documentés et comparés. Ils permettent d’objectiver le diagnostic archicratique, d’en délivrer une cartographie différenciée, et d’en circonscrire les seuils. Ils rendent la critique opératoire et la théorie falsifiable. Car il est tout à fait possible qu’un dispositif tienne avec une scène neutralisée ou relocalisée hors d’atteinte, avec des délais fictifs ou comprimés, avec des recours formellement ouverts mais pratiquement impraticables, avec des fondements difficiles à exposer ou à opposer. Dans ce cas, notre paradigme n’a pas à s’avouer inopérant : il doit précisément décrire, qualifier et mesurer cette neutralisation, cette compression, cette inopérance ou cette opacification. C’est précisément cette possibilité qui fonde sa valeur scientifique. +Ces quatre indicateurs peuvent être mesurés, documentés et comparés. Ils +permettent d'objectiver le diagnostic archicratique, d'en délivrer une +cartographie différenciée, et d'en circonscrire les seuils. Ils rendent +la critique opératoire et la théorie falsifiable. Car il est tout à fait +possible qu'un dispositif tienne avec une scène neutralisée ou +relocalisée hors d'atteinte, avec des délais fictifs ou comprimés, avec +des recours formellement ouverts mais pratiquement impraticables, avec +des fondements difficiles à exposer ou à opposer. Dans ce cas, notre +paradigme n'a pas à s'avouer inopérant : il doit précisément décrire, +qualifier et mesurer cette neutralisation, cette compression, cette +inopérance ou cette opacification. C'est précisément cette possibilité +qui fonde sa valeur scientifique. -Par ailleurs, ce paradigme pourra être confronté à des contre-exemples méthodiques — ce qui devra être éprouvé dans les usages empiriques ultérieurs du paradigme — afin de tester la puissance de sa réfutabilité. Il ne s’agit pas de tout faire entrer dans le moule archicratique, mais de tester la pertinence du moule face à des réalités rétives, résistantes, voire incompatibles. C’est cela, l’esprit de la critique : ne pas chercher la confirmation, mais la disjonction révélatrice. +Par ailleurs, ce paradigme pourra être confronté à des contre-exemples +méthodiques — ce qui devra être éprouvé dans les usages empiriques +ultérieurs du paradigme — afin de tester la puissance de sa +réfutabilité. Il ne s'agit pas de tout faire entrer dans le moule +archicratique, mais de tester la pertinence du moule face à des réalités +rétives, résistantes, voire incompatibles. C'est cela, l'esprit de la +critique : ne pas chercher la confirmation, mais la disjonction +révélatrice. -On peut le dire plus simplement : le paradigme n’est valide qu’à la condition de rencontrer des situations où il échoue à produire un gain de lisibilité, ou dans lesquelles d’autres grilles demeurent plus adéquates. Ce n’est qu’à cette condition que sa fécondité critique échappe au devenir tautologique. +On peut le dire plus simplement : le paradigme n'est valide qu'à la +condition de rencontrer des situations où il échoue à produire un gain +de lisibilité, ou dans lesquelles d'autres grilles demeurent plus +adéquates. Ce n'est qu'à cette condition que sa fécondité critique +échappe au devenir tautologique. -En définitive, le paradigme archicratique ne vaut que par sa capacité à élucider ce qui opère à travers des justifications faiblement exposables, à déplier ce qui agit à travers des scènes comprimées, mimées ou relocalisées, à donner langue à ce qui neutralise le contradictoire sans jamais l’abolir totalement. Il ne se présente pas comme une nouvelle théorie normative, ni comme un surplomb idéologique, mais comme un opérateur de détection des régulations silencieuses — celles où la scène se vide, où les délais deviennent fictifs, où les motifs deviennent inopposables, où les recours cessent d’être pratiquement saisissables, et qui, de ce fait, court-circuitent la possibilité même du politique. +En définitive, le paradigme archicratique ne vaut que par sa capacité à +élucider ce qui opère à travers des justifications faiblement +exposables, à déplier ce qui agit à travers des scènes comprimées, +mimées ou relocalisées, à donner langue à ce qui neutralise le +contradictoire sans jamais l'abolir totalement. Il ne se présente pas +comme une nouvelle théorie normative, ni comme un surplomb idéologique, +mais comme un opérateur de détection des régulations silencieuses — celles où la scène se vide, où les délais deviennent fictifs, où les +motifs deviennent inopposables, où les recours cessent d'être +pratiquement saisissables, et qui, de ce fait, court-circuitent la +possibilité même du politique. -En ce sens, il est un paradigme à la fois critique et méthodique : critique, car il met à nu les neutralisations, les évasions, les courts-circuits ; méthodique, puisqu’il les mesure, les nomme, les cartographie, et les expose à l’épreuve. Ce n’est qu’à cette double condition — fécondité analytique et opposabilité empirique — que le paradigme archicratique pourra prétendre à une légitimité scientifique, académique et politique. +En ce sens, il est un paradigme à la fois critique et méthodique : +critique, car il met à nu les neutralisations, les évasions, les +courts-circuits ; méthodique, puisqu'il les mesure, les nomme, les +cartographie, et les expose à l'épreuve. Ce n'est qu'à cette double +condition — fécondité analytique et opposabilité empirique — que le +paradigme archicratique pourra prétendre à une légitimité scientifique, +académique et politique. -Encore faut-il préciser le régime exact de cette non-neutralité. Dire que le paradigme archicratique n’est pas une théorie normative au sens classique ne signifie nullement qu’il serait axiologiquement vide. Il n’est pas neutre ; il est conditionnellement normatif. Sa normativité ne porte pas sur le contenu substantiel des fins collectives — ce qu’il faudrait vouloir, croire, préférer ou instituer absolument — mais sur les conditions minimales sous lesquelles une régulation peut être politiquement tenue, c’est-à-dire rendue explicable, opposable et révisable. +Encore faut-il préciser le régime exact de cette non-neutralité. Dire +que le paradigme archicratique n'est pas une théorie normative au sens +classique ne signifie nullement qu'il serait axiologiquement vide. Il +n'est pas neutre ; il est conditionnellement normatif. Sa normativité ne +porte pas sur le contenu substantiel des fins collectives — ce qu'il +faudrait vouloir, croire, préférer ou instituer absolument — mais sur +les conditions minimales sous lesquelles une régulation peut être +politiquement tenue, c'est-à-dire rendue explicable, opposable et +révisable. -En ce sens, l’archicratie ne dit pas ce qui est juste en dernière instance ; elle indique ce sans quoi la question même de la justice devient politiquement inerte. Elle ne prescrit pas un bien commun déterminé ; elle rend pensable l’exigence selon laquelle les décisions qui affectent des existences, des milieux et des collectifs ne devraient pas s’accomplir entièrement hors des scènes où leurs raisons, leurs instruments et leurs effets peuvent être reconduits à l’épreuve. Sa normativité est donc seconde quant aux fins, mais première quant aux conditions de leur disputabilité. +En ce sens, l'archicratie ne dit pas ce qui est juste en dernière +instance ; elle indique ce sans quoi la question même de la justice +devient politiquement inerte. Elle ne prescrit pas un bien commun +déterminé ; elle rend pensable l'exigence selon laquelle les décisions +qui affectent des existences, des milieux et des collectifs ne devraient +pas s'accomplir entièrement hors des scènes où leurs raisons, leurs +instruments et leurs effets peuvent être reconduits à l'épreuve. Sa +normativité est donc seconde quant aux fins, mais première quant aux +conditions de leur disputabilité. -C’est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique doit être compris comme critique plutôt que programmatique, et comme structuralement normatif plutôt que moralement prescriptif. Il ne fournit pas un modèle achevé de bon gouvernement ; il fournit un critère de discernement entre des régulations qui laissent ouverte la possibilité de leur reprise, et des régulations qui tendent à se refermer sur leur propre effectuation. Son exigence est minimale, mais décisive : que le pouvoir ne soit pas dispensé de comparaître. +C'est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique doit être compris comme +critique plutôt que programmatique, et comme structuralement normatif +plutôt que moralement prescriptif. Il ne fournit pas un modèle achevé de +bon gouvernement ; il fournit un critère de discernement entre des +régulations qui laissent ouverte la possibilité de leur reprise, et des +régulations qui tendent à se refermer sur leur propre effectuation. Son +exigence est minimale, mais décisive : que le pouvoir ne soit pas +dispensé de comparaître. -On pourrait dire, pour le formuler au plus serré, que l’archicratie ne vaut pas comme idéal positif du politique, mais comme seuil négatif de son inhabitabilité. Là où ce seuil est franchi, les décisions peuvent encore être efficaces, cohérentes, sophistiquées même ; elles cessent toutefois de se tenir dans des formes où elles pourraient être politiquement adressées. C’est sous ce régime précis — analytique, critique, conditionnel — que le paradigme peut maintenant être soumis à la discipline plus stricte de ses axiomes. +On pourrait dire, pour le formuler au plus serré, que l'archicratie ne +vaut pas comme idéal positif du politique, mais comme seuil négatif de +son inhabitabilité. Là où ce seuil est franchi, les décisions peuvent +encore être efficaces, cohérentes, sophistiquées même ; elles cessent +toutefois de se tenir dans des formes où elles pourraient être +politiquement adressées. C'est sous ce régime précis — analytique, +critique, conditionnel — que le paradigme peut maintenant être soumis +à la discipline plus stricte de ses axiomes. ## **1.3 —** Les axiomes régulateurs du paradigme archicratique -Les axiomes qui suivent n’ont pas pour fonction d’ajouter une solennité théorique. Ils fixent la discipline minimale du paradigme : ce qui en garantit la cohérence, ce qui en rend l’usage transmissible, et ce qui l’expose à la critique sans le dissoudre dans l’indétermination. Leur fonction n’est donc ni décorative ni simplement académique ; elle consiste à donner au cadre archicratique la rigueur requise pour qu’il puisse être mobilisé, discuté et, le cas échéant, mis en défaut. +Les axiomes qui suivent n'ont pas pour fonction d'ajouter une solennité +théorique. Ils fixent la discipline minimale du paradigme : ce qui en +garantit la cohérence, ce qui en rend l'usage transmissible, et ce qui +l'expose à la critique sans le dissoudre dans l'indétermination. Leur +fonction n'est donc ni décorative ni simplement académique ; elle +consiste à donner au cadre archicratique la rigueur requise pour qu'il +puisse être mobilisé, discuté et, le cas échéant, mis en défaut. ### 1.3.1 — Axiome de coprésence -Tout dispositif régulateur comporte, en droit ou en fait, une *arcalité*, une *cratialité* et une *archicration.* +Tout dispositif régulateur comporte, en droit ou en fait, une +*arcalité*, une *cratialité* et une *archicration.* -Ce premier axiome constitue le socle ontologique minimal du paradigme archicratique. Il ne s’agit pas ici d’un postulat normatif — c’est-à-dire de ce qui doit être — mais d’un principe descriptif fort, fondé sur une hypothèse phénoménologique généralisée : toute régulation effective, dès lors qu’elle opère comme régulation (et non comme simple agrégat de faits), comporte nécessairement une triple articulation entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, et ce qui peut être adapté. Ces trois dimensions, désignées respectivement par les termes d’*arcalité*, de *cratialité* et d’*archicration*, ne sont pas des propriétés accidentelles ou surajoutées ; elles sont les conditions minimales de l’existence d’un dispositif régulateur en tant que tel. +Ce premier axiome constitue le socle ontologique minimal du paradigme +archicratique. Il ne s'agit pas ici d'un postulat normatif — c'est-à-dire de ce qui doit être — mais d'un principe descriptif fort, +fondé sur une hypothèse phénoménologique généralisée : toute régulation +effective, dès lors qu'elle opère comme régulation (et non comme simple +agrégat de faits), comporte nécessairement une triple articulation entre +ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, et ce qui peut être adapté. Ces trois +dimensions, désignées respectivement par les termes d'*arcalité*, de +*cratialité* et d'*archicration*, ne sont pas des propriétés +accidentelles ou surajoutées ; elles sont les conditions minimales de +l'existence d'un dispositif régulateur en tant que tel. -Poser cet axiome, c’est affirmer que ces trois dimensions — même lorsqu’elles sont invisibles, réduites, capturées ou en dormance — sont toujours présentes, repérables, détectables, au moins de façon latente ou implicite. Autrement dit, on ne peut pas penser une régulation sans ce tripode, même si celui-ci est déséquilibré, distordu ou saboté. Un dispositif qui n’aurait ni *arcalité* (aucun principe fondateur ou récit de justification), ni *cratialité* (aucune opération effective, aucun vecteur d’action), ni *archicration* (aucun lieu ou possibilité de contestation ou de révision), ne serait pas un dispositif régulateur : ce serait un chaos, une contingence brute, un pur hasard ou un agrégat sans structure. +Poser cet axiome, c'est affirmer que ces trois dimensions — même +lorsqu'elles sont invisibles, réduites, capturées ou en dormance — sont toujours présentes, repérables, détectables, au moins de façon +latente ou implicite. Autrement dit, on ne peut pas penser une +régulation sans ce tripode, même si celui-ci est déséquilibré, distordu +ou saboté. Un dispositif qui n'aurait ni *arcalité* (aucun principe +fondateur ou récit de justification), ni *cratialité* (aucune opération +effective, aucun vecteur d'action), ni *archicration* (aucun lieu ou +possibilité de contestation ou de révision), ne serait pas un dispositif +régulateur : ce serait un chaos, une contingence brute, un pur hasard ou +un agrégat sans structure. -Ce que cet axiome implique immédiatement, c’est un changement de regard épistémique. Il ne suffit pas de repérer les structures visibles du pouvoir (institutions, lois, autorités) : il faut traquer les trois prises constitutives dans tout agencement régulateur — y compris ceux qui prétendent ne pas être politiques, comme par exemple, les régulations algorithmiques, les logiques d’attribution budgétaire, les procédures hospitalières, les normes de conformité technique. Même là, il y a fondement, opération et possibilité de contestation — fût-ce sous la forme de leur invisibilisation stratégique. De sorte que ce n’est pas parce que l’*arcalité* est devenue silencieuse (par exemple : une légitimation implicite par la science ou par la nécessité technique), ni parce que l’*archicration* est neutralisée, verrouillée, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante (absence de scène de recours), que ces dimensions sont absentes : elles sont alors refoulées, verrouillées, court-circuitées — mais leur absence relative est elle-même un indice paradigmatique. +Ce que cet axiome implique immédiatement, c'est un changement de regard +épistémique. Il ne suffit pas de repérer les structures visibles du +pouvoir (institutions, lois, autorités) : il faut traquer les trois +prises constitutives dans tout agencement régulateur — y compris ceux +qui prétendent ne pas être politiques, comme par exemple, les +régulations algorithmiques, les logiques d'attribution budgétaire, les +procédures hospitalières, les normes de conformité technique. Même là, +il y a fondement, opération et possibilité de contestation — fût-ce +sous la forme de leur invisibilisation stratégique. De sorte que ce +n'est pas parce que l'*arcalité* est devenue silencieuse (par exemple : +une légitimation implicite par la science ou par la nécessité +technique), ni parce que l'*archicration* est neutralisée, verrouillée, +relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante (absence +de scène de recours), que ces dimensions sont absentes : elles sont +alors refoulées, verrouillées, court-circuitées — mais leur absence +relative est elle-même un indice paradigmatique. -Toute régulation effective comporte, en acte ou en puissance, une arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration ; les pathologies contemporaines n’abolissent pas cette tripolarité, mais en opacifient les fondements, en autonomisent les opérations et en neutralisent, miment ou relocalisent la scène d’épreuve, parfois jusqu’à la dérive autarchicratique. +Toute régulation effective comporte, en acte ou en puissance, une +arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration ; les pathologies +contemporaines n'abolissent pas cette tripolarité, mais en opacifient +les fondements, en autonomisent les opérations et en neutralisent, +miment ou relocalisent la scène d'épreuve, parfois jusqu'à la dérive +autarchicratique. -L’*axiome de coprésence* a donc une valeur heuristique fondamentale. Il permet de penser les situations où une régulation semble purement technique ou exclusivement administrative (*cratialité*) comme étant toujours aussi fondée dans un imaginaire (*arcalité*) et exposée ou soustraite à une épreuve (*archicration*). Il impose ainsi une lecture structurale de tout dispositif, qu’il soit juridique, logistique, algorithmique, sanitaire, éducatif, écologique ou financier. C’est une invitation à lire dans la matière du monde les tripodes de la régulation. +L'*axiome de coprésence* a donc une valeur heuristique fondamentale. Il +permet de penser les situations où une régulation semble purement +technique ou exclusivement administrative (*cratialité*) comme étant +toujours aussi fondée dans un imaginaire (*arcalité*) et exposée ou +soustraite à une épreuve (*archicration*). Il impose ainsi une lecture +structurale de tout dispositif, qu'il soit juridique, logistique, +algorithmique, sanitaire, éducatif, écologique ou financier. C'est une +invitation à lire dans la matière du monde les tripodes de la +régulation. -Cette coprésence ne suppose pas l’équilibre. Au contraire, l’un des apports fondamentaux du paradigme archicratique est de montrer que les régulations contemporaines sont profondément dissymétriques : certaines n’ont qu’une *cratialité saturante* (ex. : dispositif technocratique opaque), d’autres une *archicration hypertrophiée* mais inefficace (ex. : scène participative proliférante sans effet décisionnel), d’autres encore une *arcalité rituelle* déconnectée de toute opération (ex. : invocation constitutionnelle sans effectuation concrète). Mais dans tous les cas, la coprésence des trois pôles demeure structurellement repérable, ne serait-ce que par leur retrait ou leur échec. En cela, la coprésence est une grille de lecture minimale, un seuil de détection politique. +Cette coprésence ne suppose pas l'équilibre. Au contraire, l'un des +apports fondamentaux du paradigme archicratique est de montrer que les +régulations contemporaines sont profondément dissymétriques : certaines +n'ont qu'une *cratialité saturante* (ex. : dispositif technocratique +opaque), d'autres une *archicration hypertrophiée* mais inefficace (ex. +: scène participative proliférante sans effet décisionnel), d'autres +encore une *arcalité rituelle* déconnectée de toute opération (ex. : +invocation constitutionnelle sans effectuation concrète). Mais dans tous +les cas, la coprésence des trois pôles demeure structurellement +repérable, ne serait-ce que par leur retrait ou leur échec. En cela, la +coprésence est une grille de lecture minimale, un seuil de détection +politique. -Il faut ici résister à une objection naïve : ne serait-il pas possible d’imaginer des régulations purement naturelles, spontanées, auto-organisées, échappant à ce triptyque ? L’anthropologie politique, les études organisationnelles, la philosophie des institutions, la sociologie pragmatique et les épistémologies de la régulation nous ont depuis longtemps enseigné que même les formes les plus rudimentaires de régulation sociale ou technique comportent des formes minimales de ce que nous nommons *arcalité*, *cratialité* et *archicration*. Un protocole technique repose toujours sur un cadre d’invocation (standard, norme, autorité), sur une chaîne d’opération (matériel, procédure), et sur une possibilité de révision (mise à jour, signalement d’erreur, audit). Même les systèmes biologiques complexes — comme les systèmes immunitaires — peuvent être lus à travers cette tripartition : reconnaissance du soi (*arcalité*), activation immunitaire (*cratialité*), et tolérance ou rétro-contrôle (*archicration*). Ce que le paradigme archicratique affirme, c’est que toute structure de régulation effective comporte ces trois dimensions — sinon, elle ne régule pas, elle dysfonctionne ou implose. +Il faut ici résister à une objection naïve : ne serait-il pas possible +d'imaginer des régulations purement naturelles, spontanées, +auto-organisées, échappant à ce triptyque ? L'anthropologie politique, +les études organisationnelles, la philosophie des institutions, la +sociologie pragmatique et les épistémologies de la régulation nous ont +depuis longtemps enseigné que même les formes les plus rudimentaires de +régulation sociale ou technique comportent des formes minimales de ce +que nous nommons *arcalité*, *cratialité* et *archicration*. Un +protocole technique repose toujours sur un cadre d'invocation (standard, +norme, autorité), sur une chaîne d'opération (matériel, procédure), et +sur une possibilité de révision (mise à jour, signalement d'erreur, +audit). Même les systèmes biologiques complexes — comme les systèmes +immunitaires — peuvent être lus à travers cette tripartition : +reconnaissance du soi (*arcalité*), activation immunitaire +(*cratialité*), et tolérance ou rétro-contrôle (*archicration*). Ce que +le paradigme archicratique affirme, c'est que toute structure de +régulation effective comporte ces trois dimensions — sinon, elle ne +régule pas, elle dysfonctionne ou implose. -Il en résulte une première exigence méthodologique pour toute enquête archicratique : partir à la recherche des trois pôles dans tout dispositif étudié. *Où est le fondement, explicite ou implicite ? Où sont les vecteurs d’opération, visibles ou occultés ? Où sont les voies d’épreuve, effectives ou empêchées ?* Ce travail de repérage ne peut pas se contenter des apparences. Il suppose une analyse croisée des textes, des objets, des fonctions, des temporalités, des seuils. L’absence visible d’un pôle ne signifie pas son inexistence, mais peut signaler un déplacement, une substitution, une capture ou une mise en scène factice. +Il en résulte une première exigence méthodologique pour toute enquête +archicratique : partir à la recherche des trois pôles dans tout +dispositif étudié. *Où est le fondement, explicite ou implicite ? Où +sont les vecteurs d'opération, visibles ou occultés ? Où sont les voies +d'épreuve, effectives ou empêchées ?* Ce travail de repérage ne peut pas +se contenter des apparences. Il suppose une analyse croisée des textes, +des objets, des fonctions, des temporalités, des seuils. L'absence +visible d'un pôle ne signifie pas son inexistence, mais peut signaler un +déplacement, une substitution, une capture ou une mise en scène factice. -Ainsi, cet axiome de coprésence ne se contente pas de définir un cadre théorique abstrait. Il impose un regard méthodique sur la régulation comme structure tripolaire inévitable. Il invite à lire tout dispositif à partir des tensions qu’il organise — ou qu’il neutralise — entre ses trois dimensions. Il est la condition formelle d’existence du paradigme archicratique : sans cette coprésence, le concept même d’archicratie ne serait qu’un mot, une abstraction sans prise sur le réel. +Ainsi, cet axiome de coprésence ne se contente pas de définir un cadre +théorique abstrait. Il impose un regard méthodique sur la régulation +comme structure tripolaire inévitable. Il invite à lire tout dispositif +à partir des tensions qu'il organise — ou qu'il neutralise — entre +ses trois dimensions. Il est la condition formelle d'existence du +paradigme archicratique : sans cette coprésence, le concept même +d'archicratie ne serait qu'un mot, une abstraction sans prise sur le +réel. -Cette coprésence ne saurait toutefois être invoquée comme un principe d’applicabilité illimitée. Elle n’autorise ni à projeter artificiellement la triade sur toute configuration empirique, ni à conclure qu’un cas devient intelligible du seul fait qu’on y postule un fondement, une opération et une épreuve. Le paradigme ne vaut qu’à la condition de produire un gain effectif de lisibilité. +Cette coprésence ne saurait toutefois être invoquée comme un principe +d'applicabilité illimitée. Elle n'autorise ni à projeter +artificiellement la triade sur toute configuration empirique, ni à +conclure qu'un cas devient intelligible du seul fait qu'on y postule un +fondement, une opération et une épreuve. Le paradigme ne vaut qu'à la +condition de produire un gain effectif de lisibilité. -Il faut donc expliciter les situations dans lesquelles son usage doit être suspendu. Premièrement, lorsque la distinction entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration ne peut être établie qu’au prix d’une reconstruction forcée, sans prise empirique suffisante. Deuxièmement, lorsque le phénomène observé relève d’une contingence dispersée, d’une inertie sans structure régulatrice stabilisée, ou d’un enchaînement trop faiblement institué pour justifier l’usage de la triade. Troisièmement, lorsque d’autres grilles descriptives rendent compte du cas avec davantage de précision, sans que l’approche archicratique n’apporte de différentiel heuristique décisif. +Il faut donc expliciter les situations dans lesquelles son usage doit +être suspendu. Premièrement, lorsque la distinction entre arcalité, +cratialité et archicration ne peut être établie qu'au prix d'une +reconstruction forcée, sans prise empirique suffisante. Deuxièmement, +lorsque le phénomène observé relève d'une contingence dispersée, d'une +inertie sans structure régulatrice stabilisée, ou d'un enchaînement trop +faiblement institué pour justifier l'usage de la triade. Troisièmement, +lorsque d'autres grilles descriptives rendent compte du cas avec +davantage de précision, sans que l'approche archicratique n'apporte de +différentiel heuristique décisif. -Dans de telles configurations, la retenue n’est pas un affaiblissement du paradigme, mais l’une de ses conditions de validité. Une théorie critique de la régulation ne vaut pas par sa capacité à tout reconduire à son langage, mais par sa capacité à se retirer là où elle n’ajoute plus de lisibilité au réel. +Dans de telles configurations, la retenue n'est pas un affaiblissement +du paradigme, mais l'une de ses conditions de validité. Une théorie +critique de la régulation ne vaut pas par sa capacité à tout reconduire +à son langage, mais par sa capacité à se retirer là où elle n'ajoute +plus de lisibilité au réel. -En ce sens, l’axiome de coprésence ne doit pas être compris comme la thèse selon laquelle toute réalité sociale serait immédiatement lisible à partir de la triade, mais comme l’hypothèse minimale selon laquelle aucune régulation stabilisée ne se soutient sans formes, explicites ou latentes, de fondation, d’opération et de reprise. L’universalité ici engagée n’est donc ni celle d’un contenu, ni celle d’un schéma explicatif total ; elle désigne seulement une condition structurale de détectabilité des régulations. +En ce sens, l'axiome de coprésence ne doit pas être compris comme la +thèse selon laquelle toute réalité sociale serait immédiatement lisible +à partir de la triade, mais comme l'hypothèse minimale selon laquelle +aucune régulation stabilisée ne se soutient sans formes, explicites ou +latentes, de fondation, d'opération et de reprise. L'universalité ici +engagée n'est donc ni celle d'un contenu, ni celle d'un schéma +explicatif total ; elle désigne seulement une condition structurale de +détectabilité des régulations. -Là où cette condition demeure indécidable, empiriquement inaccessible ou heuristiquement stérile, la suspension du paradigme s’impose. Il ne s’agit pas d’expliquer toute chose, mais de savoir à quelles conditions une régulation devient suffisamment articulée pour être lue comme telle. +Là où cette condition demeure indécidable, empiriquement inaccessible ou +heuristiquement stérile, la suspension du paradigme s'impose. Il ne +s'agit pas d'expliquer toute chose, mais de savoir à quelles conditions +une régulation devient suffisamment articulée pour être lue comme telle. -Nous verrons, dans les axiomes suivants, que cette coprésence exige également des critères de différenciation, de détectabilité, de disjonction fonctionnelle, d’épreuve critique et d’opérabilité transversale. +Nous verrons, dans les axiomes suivants, que cette coprésence exige +également des critères de différenciation, de détectabilité, de +disjonction fonctionnelle, d'épreuve critique et d'opérabilité +transversale. ### 1.3.2 — Axiome de différenciation -Les trois pôles — *arcalité*, *cratialité*, *archicration* — sont irréductibles entre eux, et non substituables. +Les trois pôles — *arcalité*, *cratialité*, *archicration* — sont +irréductibles entre eux, et non substituables. -Après avoir affirmé la co-constitution minimale de toute régulation par la présence simultanée de ces trois dimensions (*axiome de coprésence*), il nous faut désormais en verrouiller la distinction ontologique. Car si toute régulation digne de ce nom articule en effet une *arcalité* (fondement), une *cratialité* (opération) et une *archicration* (épreuve), encore faut-il éviter la confusion de ces pôles — confusion qui, à l’échelle politique, épistémologique ou institutionnelle, constitue l’une des pathologies majeures des régimes archicratiques. L’*axiome de différenciation* soutient donc une proposition forte : ces trois pôles ne sont pas des degrés d’un même phénomène, ni des variations d’une même fonction, mais des registres irréductibles, non commensurables, non interchangeables. +Après avoir affirmé la co-constitution minimale de toute régulation par +la présence simultanée de ces trois dimensions (*axiome de coprésence*), +il nous faut désormais en verrouiller la distinction ontologique. Car si +toute régulation digne de ce nom articule en effet une *arcalité* +(fondement), une *cratialité* (opération) et une *archicration* +(épreuve), encore faut-il éviter la confusion de ces pôles — confusion +qui, à l'échelle politique, épistémologique ou institutionnelle, +constitue l'une des pathologies majeures des régimes archicratiques. +L'*axiome de différenciation* soutient donc une proposition forte : ces +trois pôles ne sont pas des degrés d'un même phénomène, ni des +variations d'une même fonction, mais des registres irréductibles, non +commensurables, non interchangeables. -Autrement dit, nul ne peut fonder en opérant, nul ne peut opérer en contestant, nul ne peut contester en fondant. Toute tentative de substitution d’un pôle par un autre — comme si l’un d’eux pouvait se passer des deux autres ou les contenir — produit une dérive, un déséquilibre ou une distorsion de la régulation. Et, dans les régimes contemporains, ces distorsions sont fréquentes : elles constituent précisément les mécanismes d’euphémisation, de naturalisation ou d’occultation du pouvoir que le paradigme archicratique se donne pour tâche de rendre visibles. +Autrement dit, nul ne peut fonder en opérant, nul ne peut opérer en +contestant, nul ne peut contester en fondant. Toute tentative de +substitution d'un pôle par un autre — comme si l'un d'eux pouvait se +passer des deux autres ou les contenir — produit une dérive, un +déséquilibre ou une distorsion de la régulation. Et, dans les régimes +contemporains, ces distorsions sont fréquentes : elles constituent +précisément les mécanismes d'euphémisation, de naturalisation ou +d'occultation du pouvoir que le paradigme archicratique se donne pour +tâche de rendre visibles. Prenons quelques exemples typiques : -Lorsqu’une régulation prétend se légitimer par sa seule efficacité opérationnelle — « ça marche, donc c’est légitime » — elle fait de la *cratialité* une *arcalité* : c’est un cas classique de technocratie performative, où la force d’exécution est posée comme source de droit. Or cette confusion efface le débat sur les finalités, les valeurs, les principes — et rend la régulation imperméable à toute critique normative. C’est ce que l’on observe par exemple dans certains usages de la gestion algorithmique publique : l’efficacité devient la légitimation. +Lorsqu'une régulation prétend se légitimer par sa seule efficacité +opérationnelle — « ça marche, donc c'est légitime » — elle fait de +la *cratialité* une *arcalité* : c'est un cas classique de technocratie +performative, où la force d'exécution est posée comme source de droit. +Or cette confusion efface le débat sur les finalités, les valeurs, les +principes — et rend la régulation imperméable à toute critique +normative. C'est ce que l'on observe par exemple dans certains usages de +la gestion algorithmique publique : l'efficacité devient la +légitimation. -À l’inverse, certaines configurations fondent leur légitimité sur une *arcalité* hyperbolique (sacrée, symbolique, doctrinale), mais sans *cratialité* concrète. Le droit proclamé reste lettre morte, la Constitution devient mythe sans prise, le serment se vide dans l’inaction. C’est la pathologie de l’impuissance fondée, ou du fétichisme institutionnel : tout est dit, mais rien n’est fait. +À l'inverse, certaines configurations fondent leur légitimité sur une +*arcalité* hyperbolique (sacrée, symbolique, doctrinale), mais sans +*cratialité* concrète. Le droit proclamé reste lettre morte, la +Constitution devient mythe sans prise, le serment se vide dans +l'inaction. C'est la pathologie de l'impuissance fondée, ou du +fétichisme institutionnel : tout est dit, mais rien n'est fait. -D’autres régulations tentent encore de faire de l’archicration un simple fondement, en posant l’existence d’une scène délibérative ou d’un dispositif de consultation comme source suffisante de légitimité. C’est la pathologie de la « consultation alibi », où l’ouverture au débat remplace la justification. La scène est là, mais elle n’a pas de prise réelle sur l’opération ; elle fonctionne comme simulacre de légitimation. +D'autres régulations tentent encore de faire de l'archicration un simple +fondement, en posant l'existence d'une scène délibérative ou d'un +dispositif de consultation comme source suffisante de légitimité. C'est +la pathologie de la « consultation alibi », où l'ouverture au débat +remplace la justification. La scène est là, mais elle n'a pas de prise +réelle sur l'opération ; elle fonctionne comme simulacre de +légitimation. -C’est donc en refusant toute fusion, toute réversibilité, toute réduction entre ces pôles que le paradigme archicratique se donne une force critique : il permet de nommer, dans chaque situation, le pôle absent, court-circuité, sursaturé ou mimé. Il rend possible un diagnostic différentiel : ce qui manque, ce qui déborde, ce qui est confondu. +C'est donc en refusant toute fusion, toute réversibilité, toute +réduction entre ces pôles que le paradigme archicratique se donne une +force critique : il permet de nommer, dans chaque situation, le pôle +absent, court-circuité, sursaturé ou mimé. Il rend possible un +diagnostic différentiel : ce qui manque, ce qui déborde, ce qui est +confondu. -Cette différenciation n’est pas une invention purement formelle. Elle s’enracine dans l’histoire longue des formes politiques. Dès Aristote, la distinction entre la légitimité (*díkaios*), l’opération (*dunatós*), et la délibération (*bouleutikón*) signalait que la vie politique est tissée de fonctions distinctes. Montesquieu, en distinguant les trois pouvoirs (législatif, exécutif, judiciaire), esquissait déjà — dans une forme certes différente — une tripartition qui répondait à ce même souci de non-substitution. Plus récemment, des auteurs comme Pierre Rosanvallon ont insisté sur la nécessité de distinguer les formes de légitimation, d’exécution et de mise à l’épreuve du pouvoir comme autant de modalités non superposables. +Cette différenciation n'est pas une invention purement formelle. Elle +s'enracine dans l'histoire longue des formes politiques. Dès Aristote, +la distinction entre la légitimité (*díkaios*), l'opération (*dunatós*), +et la délibération (*bouleutikón*) signalait que la vie politique est +tissée de fonctions distinctes. Montesquieu, en distinguant les trois +pouvoirs (législatif, exécutif, judiciaire), esquissait déjà — dans +une forme certes différente — une tripartition qui répondait à ce même +souci de non-substitution. Plus récemment, des auteurs comme Pierre +Rosanvallon ont insisté sur la nécessité de distinguer les formes de +légitimation, d'exécution et de mise à l'épreuve du pouvoir comme autant +de modalités non superposables. -Mais là où le paradigme archicratique va plus loin, c’est qu’il ne fonde pas cette différenciation sur les institutions, mais sur les régimes de prises : fondement, opération, dispute. Ce n’est pas le nom de l’institution ou sa place dans un organigramme qui compte, mais la nature fonctionnelle de sa prise dans le dispositif. Une même entité peut, selon les cas, incarner une *arcalité* (en tant que fondement invoqué), une *cratialité* (en tant qu’opérateur), ou une *archicration* (en tant que scène d’épreuve). L’exemple typique en est la cour constitutionnelle : dans certains cas, elle agit comme *archicration* (lieu de recours), dans d’autres comme *cratialité* (outil de blocage), dans d’autres encore comme *arcalité* (source de légitimité symbolique). D’où l’importance de dés-essentialiser les fonctions, et de relire chaque dispositif en fonction de la prise qu’il exerce dans la régulation. +Mais là où le paradigme archicratique va plus loin, c'est qu'il ne fonde +pas cette différenciation sur les institutions, mais sur les régimes de +prises : fondement, opération, dispute. Ce n'est pas le nom de +l'institution ou sa place dans un organigramme qui compte, mais la +nature fonctionnelle de sa prise dans le dispositif. Une même entité +peut, selon les cas, incarner une *arcalité* (en tant que fondement +invoqué), une *cratialité* (en tant qu'opérateur), ou une *archicration* +(en tant que scène d'épreuve). L'exemple typique en est la cour +constitutionnelle : dans certains cas, elle agit comme *archicration* +(lieu de recours), dans d'autres comme *cratialité* (outil de blocage), +dans d'autres encore comme *arcalité* (source de légitimité symbolique). +D'où l'importance de dés-essentialiser les fonctions, et de relire +chaque dispositif en fonction de la prise qu'il exerce dans la +régulation. -Cette irréductibilité est également épistémologiquement essentielle. Elle permet d’éviter les dérives totalisantes des paradigmes monodimensionnels : les théories du pouvoir qui réduisent tout à la domination (*kratòs*), à la norme (*nomos*), au discours (*logos*) ou à la scène (*agora*) ne peuvent penser la complexité des régulations contemporaines. Seul un paradigme triadique différencié peut saisir la dynamique des tensions constitutives. +Cette irréductibilité est également épistémologiquement essentielle. +Elle permet d'éviter les dérives totalisantes des paradigmes +monodimensionnels : les théories du pouvoir qui réduisent tout à la +domination (*kratòs*), à la norme (*nomos*), au discours (*logos*) ou à +la scène (*agora*) ne peuvent penser la complexité des régulations +contemporaines. Seul un paradigme triadique différencié peut saisir la +dynamique des tensions constitutives. -Enfin, cette différenciation est politiquement salutaire. Car c’est elle qui rend possible une critique articulée, une exigence de réforme précise, une possibilité de reprise : on peut exiger un renforcement de l’*archicration* sans remettre en cause l’*arcalité* ; on peut contester une *cratialité* opaque sans délégitimer la régulation elle-même ; on peut interroger un fondement sans paralyser l’action. Le paradigme ne fige pas : il ouvre à la disjonction constructive, à la critique située, à la réparation ciblée. +Enfin, cette différenciation est politiquement salutaire. Car c'est elle +qui rend possible une critique articulée, une exigence de réforme +précise, une possibilité de reprise : on peut exiger un renforcement de +l'*archicration* sans remettre en cause l'*arcalité* ; on peut contester +une *cratialité* opaque sans délégitimer la régulation elle-même ; on +peut interroger un fondement sans paralyser l'action. Le paradigme ne +fige pas : il ouvre à la disjonction constructive, à la critique située, +à la réparation ciblée. -C’est pourquoi cet axiome de différenciation est, avec celui de coprésence, l’un des gardiens fondamentaux du paradigme archicratique. Il empêche la confusion des fonctions, des registres, des prises. Il structure la lecture, régule l’analyse, et protège le paradigme contre la dérive spéculative. Toute régulation est tripolaire ; mais chaque pôle est irréductible aux deux autres. +C'est pourquoi cet axiome de différenciation est, avec celui de +coprésence, l'un des gardiens fondamentaux du paradigme archicratique. +Il empêche la confusion des fonctions, des registres, des prises. Il +structure la lecture, régule l'analyse, et protège le paradigme contre +la dérive spéculative. Toute régulation est tripolaire ; mais chaque +pôle est irréductible aux deux autres. ### 1.3.3 — Axiome de détectabilité -Tout dispositif régulateur manifeste, en acte ou en creux, des signes, objets ou symptômes de ses trois pôles constitutifs : *arcalité, cratialité, archicration*. Ces traces sont repérables, déchiffrables, documentables. +Tout dispositif régulateur manifeste, en acte ou en creux, des signes, +objets ou symptômes de ses trois pôles constitutifs : *arcalité, +cratialité, archicration*. Ces traces sont repérables, déchiffrables, +documentables. -L’une des conditions essentielles de la validité scientifique d’un paradigme est sa capacité à produire des objets de repérage. C’est là une exigence aussi ancienne que le geste épistémologique lui-même : toute hypothèse robuste doit pouvoir se traduire en indicateurs empiriques, en phénomènes observables, en matérialités discernables. Sans cette possibilité de détection, le paradigme bascule dans le dogmatisme spéculatif ou dans l’abstraction stérile. C’est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique se dote d’un troisième principe fondamental : l’*axiome de détectabilité*. +L'une des conditions essentielles de la validité scientifique d'un +paradigme est sa capacité à produire des objets de repérage. C'est là +une exigence aussi ancienne que le geste épistémologique lui-même : +toute hypothèse robuste doit pouvoir se traduire en indicateurs +empiriques, en phénomènes observables, en matérialités discernables. +Sans cette possibilité de détection, le paradigme bascule dans le +dogmatisme spéculatif ou dans l'abstraction stérile. C'est pourquoi le +paradigme archicratique se dote d'un troisième principe fondamental : +l'*axiome de détectabilité*. -Cet axiome affirme que les trois pôles constitutifs de toute régulation — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — laissent des traces. Non pas nécessairement des objets immédiatement visibles ou simplement localisables dans l’espace social, mais toujours des signes différenciés, des formes métonymiques, des symptômes infra-structurels permettant d’attester leur présence, leur absence, leur mutation ou leur dissimulation. +Cet axiome affirme que les trois pôles constitutifs de toute régulation — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — laissent des traces. Non pas +nécessairement des objets immédiatement visibles ou simplement +localisables dans l'espace social, mais toujours des signes +différenciés, des formes métonymiques, des symptômes infra-structurels +permettant d'attester leur présence, leur absence, leur mutation ou leur +dissimulation. -On ne saurait ici se contenter d’une ontologie des fonctions. Ce qui fonde, ce qui opère, ce qui se dispute ne sont pas des abstractions pures, mais des prises effectives qui affectent des situations, organisent des rapports, structurent des dispositifs. Et toute prise laisse une empreinte, un effet, une forme. L’*arcalité* laisse des *marques d’autorité ou d’origine* ; la *cratialité* laisse des *marques d’opération ou d’effet* ; l’*archicration* laisse des *marques de différé ou d’opposabilité*. Ces marques ne sont pas nécessairement explicites, mais elles sont détectables dans leur performativité concrète. +On ne saurait ici se contenter d'une ontologie des fonctions. Ce qui +fonde, ce qui opère, ce qui se dispute ne sont pas des abstractions +pures, mais des prises effectives qui affectent des situations, +organisent des rapports, structurent des dispositifs. Et toute prise +laisse une empreinte, un effet, une forme. L'*arcalité* laisse des +*marques d'autorité ou d'origine* ; la *cratialité* laisse des *marques +d'opération ou d'effet* ; l'*archicration* laisse des *marques de +différé ou d'opposabilité*. Ces marques ne sont pas nécessairement +explicites, mais elles sont détectables dans leur performativité +concrète. -Ce postulat est ce qui distingue fondamentalement un paradigme critique d’un prêche dogmatique. Là où la doxa se satisfait d’un discours de dénonciation ou de déploration générale, un paradigme critique exige que l’on puisse identifier les mécanismes concrets, déplier les chaînes de causalité, cartographier les formes et les formats par lesquels les pôles agissent ou se dérobent. +Ce postulat est ce qui distingue fondamentalement un paradigme critique +d'un prêche dogmatique. Là où la doxa se satisfait d'un discours de +dénonciation ou de déploration générale, un paradigme critique exige que +l'on puisse identifier les mécanismes concrets, déplier les chaînes de +causalité, cartographier les formes et les formats par lesquels les +pôles agissent ou se dérobent. -Prenons quelques cas, tirés de régulations empiriques actuelles. D’abord, premier cas, un algorithme de notation des allocataires, utilisé par une agence de service public, laisse une *trace cratiale* (le code, l’interface, les données d’entrée) ; il peut laisser une *trace arcale* (un décret d’instauration, une doctrine implicite d’efficience budgétaire) ; il peut ne laisser aucune *trace archicrative* (pas de publication des critères, pas de voie de recours, pas de transparence procédurale). L’absence elle-même devient un signe : le vide de contestation est un indicateur de capture. +Prenons quelques cas, tirés de régulations empiriques actuelles. +D'abord, premier cas, un algorithme de notation des allocataires, +utilisé par une agence de service public, laisse une *trace cratiale* +(le code, l'interface, les données d'entrée) ; il peut laisser une +*trace arcale* (un décret d'instauration, une doctrine implicite +d'efficience budgétaire) ; il peut ne laisser aucune *trace +archicrative* (pas de publication des critères, pas de voie de recours, +pas de transparence procédurale). L'absence elle-même devient un signe : +le vide de contestation est un indicateur de capture. -À l’inverse, autre cas, un dispositif de régulation environnementale porté par une instance participative mixte (État, ONG, citoyens, scientifiques) laisse une triple série de signes : charte fondatrice ou traité (*arcalité*), documents de cadrage opérationnel et matrices de mise en œuvre (*cratialité*), comptes rendus délibératifs, délais d’amendement, protocoles de révision (*archicration*). Ce n’est pas leur perfection qui importe ici, mais leur localisation et leur lisibilité. +À l'inverse, autre cas, un dispositif de régulation environnementale +porté par une instance participative mixte (État, ONG, citoyens, +scientifiques) laisse une triple série de signes : charte fondatrice ou +traité (*arcalité*), documents de cadrage opérationnel et matrices de +mise en œuvre (*cratialité*), comptes rendus délibératifs, délais +d'amendement, protocoles de révision (*archicration*). Ce n'est pas leur +perfection qui importe ici, mais leur localisation et leur lisibilité. -Mais les traces ne sont pas toujours textuelles ou objectivables selon des standards positivistes. Certaines sont symboliques, rituelles, spatiales, architecturales, performatives. Une salle close sans public ni captation vidéo, un badge sans identité nominative, une convocation sans mention du droit de recours, un tableau de bord sans seuils de déclenchement... tous ces détails, ces formes mineures, sont les métonymies silencieuses de la régulation. Elles disent, sans discours, ce qui est légitime, ce qui est exercé, ce qui est controversable — ou non. +Mais les traces ne sont pas toujours textuelles ou objectivables selon +des standards positivistes. Certaines sont symboliques, rituelles, +spatiales, architecturales, performatives. Une salle close sans public +ni captation vidéo, un badge sans identité nominative, une convocation +sans mention du droit de recours, un tableau de bord sans seuils de +déclenchement... tous ces détails, ces formes mineures, sont les +métonymies silencieuses de la régulation. Elles disent, sans discours, +ce qui est légitime, ce qui est exercé, ce qui est controversable — ou +non. -L’analyse archicratique devient alors un art de la lecture métonymique : une capacité à repérer les *objets-signatures*, les *vecteurs de fonction*, les *indices de prise ou de retrait*. À ce titre, elle réclame une méthode à la fois documentaire (examiner les textes, les procès-verbaux, les décisions), ethnographique (observer les scènes, les silences, les rituels), sémiotique (analyser les formes, les signes, les temporalités), et institutionnelle (situer les effets, les fonctions, les jeux de rôle). La pensée archicratique est une pensée indiciaire, au sens de Carlo Ginzburg : elle traque les traces là où le pouvoir peut les avoir effacées. +L'analyse archicratique devient alors un art de la lecture métonymique : +une capacité à repérer les *objets-signatures*, les *vecteurs de +fonction*, les *indices de prise ou de retrait*. À ce titre, elle +réclame une méthode à la fois documentaire (examiner les textes, les +procès-verbaux, les décisions), ethnographique (observer les scènes, les +silences, les rituels), sémiotique (analyser les formes, les signes, les +temporalités), et institutionnelle (situer les effets, les fonctions, +les jeux de rôle). La pensée archicratique est une pensée indiciaire, au +sens de Carlo Ginzburg : elle traque les traces là où le pouvoir peut +les avoir effacées. -Mais, et c’est là un point crucial, cette détectabilité est aussi ce qui fonde l’exigence de vérifiabilité du paradigme lui-même. Un paradigme qui n’indique pas comment l’on pourrait attester empiriquement ses catégories court le risque de se transformer en idéologie molle ou en critique moralisante. Le paradigme archicratique ne postule pas l’existence universelle des trois pôles — il postule leur *observance potentielle dans tout dispositif qui se prétend régulateur.* S’il n’y a rien à détecter, il n’y a rien à réguler — ou alors le dispositif relève de la violence brute, de l’habitus incorporé ou de la norme informelle, mais pas d’une régulation politique instituée. C’est là un critère de limite. +Mais, et c'est là un point crucial, cette détectabilité est aussi ce qui +fonde l'exigence de vérifiabilité du paradigme lui-même. Un paradigme +qui n'indique pas comment l'on pourrait attester empiriquement ses +catégories court le risque de se transformer en idéologie molle ou en +critique moralisante. Le paradigme archicratique ne postule pas +l'existence universelle des trois pôles — il postule leur *observance +potentielle dans tout dispositif qui se prétend régulateur.* S'il n'y a +rien à détecter, il n'y a rien à réguler — ou alors le dispositif +relève de la violence brute, de l'habitus incorporé ou de la norme +informelle, mais pas d'une régulation politique instituée. C'est là un +critère de limite. -L’*axiome de détectabilité* fonctionne donc comme garantie épistémologique (ce que nous disons peut être vérifié, infirmé, cartographié), mais aussi comme levier politique : car ce que l’on peut détecter, on peut le critiquer. Et ce que l’on peut critiquer, on peut possiblement le transformer. Cet axiome est ainsi un outil de combat intellectuel — contre l’invisibilisation des dispositifs, contre l’effacement des responsabilités, contre la naturalisation des effets. +L'*axiome de détectabilité* fonctionne donc comme garantie +épistémologique (ce que nous disons peut être vérifié, infirmé, +cartographié), mais aussi comme levier politique : car ce que l'on peut +détecter, on peut le critiquer. Et ce que l'on peut critiquer, on peut +possiblement le transformer. Cet axiome est ainsi un outil de combat +intellectuel — contre l'invisibilisation des dispositifs, contre +l'effacement des responsabilités, contre la naturalisation des effets. -Il en découle un impératif méthodologique : dans toute analyse archicratique, il faut traquer les traces. *Traces d’arcalité* (fondements invoqués ou naturalisés), *traces de cratialité* (vecteurs opérants, effets produits), *traces d’archicration* (scènes instituées, temporalités différées, voies de reprise). Ces traces peuvent être faibles ou fortes, visibles ou latentes, affirmées ou dérobées, mais leur identification est la condition d’intelligibilité du paradigme. +Il en découle un impératif méthodologique : dans toute analyse +archicratique, il faut traquer les traces. *Traces d'arcalité* +(fondements invoqués ou naturalisés), *traces de cratialité* (vecteurs +opérants, effets produits), *traces d'archicration* (scènes instituées, +temporalités différées, voies de reprise). Ces traces peuvent être +faibles ou fortes, visibles ou latentes, affirmées ou dérobées, mais +leur identification est la condition d'intelligibilité du paradigme. -Dans la section 1.4, nous déploierons une cartographie systémique de ces objets-traces — non pas pour les figer dans un inventaire mort, mais pour outiller l’analyse critique et fonder une grille de lecture praticable. L’axiome de détectabilité en constitue le socle opératoire. +Dans la section 1.4, nous déploierons une cartographie systémique de ces +objets-traces — non pas pour les figer dans un inventaire mort, mais +pour outiller l'analyse critique et fonder une grille de lecture +praticable. L'axiome de détectabilité en constitue le socle opératoire. ### 1.3.4 — Axiome de disjonction fonctionnelle -Aucun des trois pôles constitutifs du paradigme archicratique — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — ne peut, seul, produire une régulation politiquement viable. Toute tentative de monopole fonctionnel engendre une pathologie de régulation, une crise de recevabilité, une opacité normative ou une instabilité de performance. +Aucun des trois pôles constitutifs du paradigme archicratique — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — ne peut, seul, produire une +régulation politiquement viable. Toute tentative de monopole fonctionnel +engendre une pathologie de régulation, une crise de recevabilité, une +opacité normative ou une instabilité de performance. -Cet axiome tire toutes les conséquences analytiques et politiques de ce que nous avons établi comme architecture fondatrice du paradigme archicratique : la régulation politique ne repose pas sur un centre unique d’autorité, ni sur une mécanique univoque d’exécution, ni sur une utopie dialogique sans ancrage. Elle repose sur une tenue dynamique entre trois fonctions irréductibles : fonder, opérer, disputer. +Cet axiome tire toutes les conséquences analytiques et politiques de ce +que nous avons établi comme architecture fondatrice du paradigme +archicratique : la régulation politique ne repose pas sur un centre +unique d'autorité, ni sur une mécanique univoque d'exécution, ni sur une +utopie dialogique sans ancrage. Elle repose sur une tenue dynamique +entre trois fonctions irréductibles : fonder, opérer, disputer. -Mais plus encore que leur distinction, c’est leur non-substituabilité qui constitue le cœur de l’axiome ici énoncé. Ce que nous affirmons, c’est que chacun des trois pôles est nécessaire, mais aucun n’est suffisant. Pris isolément, chacun génère une forme de déséquilibre radical, une défaillance politique, un court-circuit de la régulation. Le paradigme archicratique, dès lors, ne repose pas sur une simple addition, mais bien sur une disjonction fonctionnelle stricte : les trois fonctions doivent être tenues ensemble, sans qu’aucune ne puisse se substituer aux deux autres. +Mais plus encore que leur distinction, c'est leur non-substituabilité +qui constitue le cœur de l'axiome ici énoncé. Ce que nous affirmons, +c'est que chacun des trois pôles est nécessaire, mais aucun n'est +suffisant. Pris isolément, chacun génère une forme de déséquilibre +radical, une défaillance politique, un court-circuit de la régulation. +Le paradigme archicratique, dès lors, ne repose pas sur une simple +addition, mais bien sur une disjonction fonctionnelle stricte : les +trois fonctions doivent être tenues ensemble, sans qu'aucune ne puisse +se substituer aux deux autres. -Ce principe a une portée théorique majeure. Il interdit toute régression vers une ontologie mono-polaire du politique. Il récuse les réductions trop souvent opérées dans l’analyse des dispositifs. Lorsque le politique est saisi uniquement comme fondement, valeur, idéal ou texte, la régulation devient pur symbolisme. C’est le règne du mythe ou du droit sans effets. Les chartes sont proclamées, mais rien ne les rend opératoires. La Constitution devient un fétiche ; la norme, un leurre. Cette sur-arcalisation engendre des régimes rhétoriques, où le fondement reste sans effet. +Ce principe a une portée théorique majeure. Il interdit toute régression +vers une ontologie mono-polaire du politique. Il récuse les réductions +trop souvent opérées dans l'analyse des dispositifs. Lorsque le +politique est saisi uniquement comme fondement, valeur, idéal ou texte, +la régulation devient pur symbolisme. C'est le règne du mythe ou du +droit sans effets. Les chartes sont proclamées, mais rien ne les rend +opératoires. La Constitution devient un fétiche ; la norme, un leurre. +Cette sur-arcalisation engendre des régimes rhétoriques, où le fondement +reste sans effet. -Lorsque l’on ne considère que les opérations, les effets, les instruments, on tombe dans le technocratisme ou l’esprit gestionnaire. La régulation devient pure exécution. Il n’y a plus ni fondement, ni controverse, seulement des flux, des chiffres, des KPI, des indicateurs d’impact. C’est la pathologie managériale des démocraties libérales tardives : tout est gouverné, mais rien n’est habité politiquement. Seule la force traverse la langue du pouvoir. +Lorsque l'on ne considère que les opérations, les effets, les +instruments, on tombe dans le technocratisme ou l'esprit gestionnaire. +La régulation devient pure exécution. Il n'y a plus ni fondement, ni +controverse, seulement des flux, des chiffres, des KPI, des indicateurs +d'impact. C'est la pathologie managériale des démocraties libérales +tardives : tout est gouverné, mais rien n'est habité politiquement. +Seule la force traverse la langue du pouvoir. -Autre réduction, lorsque tout est renvoyé à la dispute, à la consultation, à la délibération, mais sans fondement clair ni pouvoir opératoire réel, la régulation devient palabre, paralysie, forme vide de confrontation sans ancrage ni effectuation. C’est la pathologie participative : tout semble disputé, mais rien n’est transformé ; tout est mis en débat, mais rien n’est gouverné. +Autre réduction, lorsque tout est renvoyé à la dispute, à la +consultation, à la délibération, mais sans fondement clair ni pouvoir +opératoire réel, la régulation devient palabre, paralysie, forme vide de +confrontation sans ancrage ni effectuation. C'est la pathologie +participative : tout semble disputé, mais rien n'est transformé ; tout +est mis en débat, mais rien n'est gouverné. -L’histoire politique moderne offre de nombreux exemples de ces régimes déséquilibrés : républiques fondées sur des textes constitutionnels irréprochables, mais pratiquement inopérantes ; dictatures fonctionnelles et performantes bien que sans légitimité ni controverse possible ; démocraties dites « délibératives » paralysées par l’inflation des consultations sans pouvoir réel. Chaque fois qu’un pôle tend à se substituer aux deux autres, la régulation se dégrade — soit en simulacre, soit en oppression, soit en chaos. +L'histoire politique moderne offre de nombreux exemples de ces régimes +déséquilibrés : républiques fondées sur des textes constitutionnels +irréprochables, mais pratiquement inopérantes ; dictatures +fonctionnelles et performantes bien que sans légitimité ni controverse +possible ; démocraties dites « délibératives » paralysées par +l'inflation des consultations sans pouvoir réel. Chaque fois qu'un pôle +tend à se substituer aux deux autres, la régulation se dégrade — soit +en simulacre, soit en oppression, soit en chaos. -Ce que l’axiome de disjonction fonctionnelle impose, c’est une lecture différentielle, exigeante, des configurations régulatrices. Il oblige à penser non seulement la présence des trois pôles, mais surtout leur non-confusion. Il n’est pas rare, en effet, que des dispositifs affichent un fondement alors qu’il ne s’agit que d’un effet de langage cratial ; qu’ils prétendent à la dispute alors qu’ils ne permettent aucun recours réel ; qu’ils opèrent à vide sans principe exposable ni scène praticable. Ce ne sont pas là des formes accomplies de l’archicratie, mais des configurations autarchicratiques ou archicratistiques dans lesquelles les trois pôles sont mimés, exhibés ou stylisés tout en étant partiellement court-circuités — comme le montrent certaines plateformes de participation citoyenne entièrement encadrées par des algorithmes de tri, de hiérarchisation ou d’euphémisation. +Ce que l'axiome de disjonction fonctionnelle impose, c'est une lecture +différentielle, exigeante, des configurations régulatrices. Il oblige à +penser non seulement la présence des trois pôles, mais surtout leur +non-confusion. Il n'est pas rare, en effet, que des dispositifs +affichent un fondement alors qu'il ne s'agit que d'un effet de langage +cratial ; qu'ils prétendent à la dispute alors qu'ils ne permettent +aucun recours réel ; qu'ils opèrent à vide sans principe exposable ni +scène praticable. Ce ne sont pas là des formes accomplies de +l'archicratie, mais des configurations autarchicratiques ou +archicratistiques dans lesquelles les trois pôles sont mimés, exhibés ou +stylisés tout en étant partiellement court-circuités — comme le +montrent certaines plateformes de participation citoyenne entièrement +encadrées par des algorithmes de tri, de hiérarchisation ou +d'euphémisation. -Autrement dit, ce que l’on croit parfois être une régulation équilibrée peut en réalité relever d’un effondrement fonctionnel déguisé, d’une substitution abusive, d’une délégation simulée. L’axiome de disjonction fonctionnelle (1.3.4) vient ensuite avertir que l’effacement, la neutralisation ou l’hypertrophie d’un seul pôle conduit nécessairement à une régulation pathologique. De sorte qu’un ordre privé de fondement exposable, de scène d’épreuve praticable ou de capacité opératoire effective n’est ni pleinement viable, ni légitime, ni habitable. +Autrement dit, ce que l'on croit parfois être une régulation équilibrée +peut en réalité relever d'un effondrement fonctionnel déguisé, d'une +substitution abusive, d'une délégation simulée. L'axiome de disjonction +fonctionnelle (1.3.4) vient ensuite avertir que l'effacement, la +neutralisation ou l'hypertrophie d'un seul pôle conduit nécessairement à +une régulation pathologique. De sorte qu'un ordre privé de fondement +exposable, de scène d'épreuve praticable ou de capacité opératoire +effective n'est ni pleinement viable, ni légitime, ni habitable. -Mais cet axiome a aussi une portée épistémologique et méthodologique. Il oblige l’analyste à disjoindre ce que la régulation tend à confondre. Il impose de ne pas se satisfaire d’un indicateur unique ou d’une déclaration de principe. Il exige de chercher, pour chaque dispositif : *Quelle est la source réelle de l’arcalité invoquée ? Quelle est la structure effective de la cratialité mobilisée ? Quelle est la scène concrète d’archicration instituée ?* +Mais cet axiome a aussi une portée épistémologique et méthodologique. Il +oblige l'analyste à disjoindre ce que la régulation tend à confondre. Il +impose de ne pas se satisfaire d'un indicateur unique ou d'une +déclaration de principe. Il exige de chercher, pour chaque dispositif : +*Quelle est la source réelle de l'arcalité invoquée ? Quelle est la +structure effective de la cratialité mobilisée ? Quelle est la scène +concrète d'archicration instituée ?* -Et si l’un de ces éléments manque, est mimé, est désactivé — alors la régulation est déséquilibrée, même si elle semble efficace ou juste. La viabilité politique d’un dispositif ne se mesure pas à sa performance, mais à sa tenue archicratique. +Et si l'un de ces éléments manque, est mimé, est désactivé — alors la +régulation est déséquilibrée, même si elle semble efficace ou juste. La +viabilité politique d'un dispositif ne se mesure pas à sa performance, +mais à sa tenue archicratique. -Nous verrons, dans les sections suivantes, comment cet axiome fonde l’analyse des pathologies de régulation (section 1.5), comment il oriente les critères de recevabilité du paradigme (section 1.6), et comment il permet d’identifier les formes métonymiques des déséquilibres. Pour l’heure, il nous suffit d’affirmer ceci : le paradigme archicratique n’est valide que s’il résiste à la tentation de la réduction — qu’elle soit légitime, instrumentale ou dialogique. Car toute substitution d’un pôle aux deux autres tend à transformer la régulation en simulacre. +Nous verrons, dans les sections suivantes, comment cet axiome fonde +l'analyse des pathologies de régulation (section 1.5), comment il +oriente les critères de recevabilité du paradigme (section 1.6), et +comment il permet d'identifier les formes métonymiques des +déséquilibres. Pour l'heure, il nous suffit d'affirmer ceci : le +paradigme archicratique n'est valide que s'il résiste à la tentation de +la réduction — qu'elle soit légitime, instrumentale ou dialogique. Car +toute substitution d'un pôle aux deux autres tend à transformer la +régulation en simulacre. ### 1.3.5 — Axiome de variabilité différentielle -Les formes prises par l’*arcalité*, la *cratialité* et l’*archicration* sont historiquement, culturellement et contextuellement variables. Le paradigme archicratique repose sur une structure invariante — la triade — mais dont les modalités concrètes de manifestation diffèrent selon les régimes, les sociétés, les dispositifs, les temporalités. +Les formes prises par l'*arcalité*, la *cratialité* et l'*archicration* +sont historiquement, culturellement et contextuellement variables. Le +paradigme archicratique repose sur une structure invariante — la +triade — mais dont les modalités concrètes de manifestation diffèrent +selon les régimes, les sociétés, les dispositifs, les temporalités. -Cet axiome invite à une prudence épistémologique fondamentale. Il affirme que, si la structure archicratique s’envisage comme universelle dans sa logique fonctionnelle, ses expressions empiriques, ses matérialisations sociales, ses inscriptions institutionnelles sont toujours situées, différenciées, et historiquement datables. Il s’oppose à toute tentation de normativité rigide ou de formalisme abstrait, et impose au contraire une lecture située, pluraliste, géo-historique des configurations politiques. +Cet axiome invite à une prudence épistémologique fondamentale. Il +affirme que, si la structure archicratique s'envisage comme universelle +dans sa logique fonctionnelle, ses expressions empiriques, ses +matérialisations sociales, ses inscriptions institutionnelles sont +toujours situées, différenciées, et historiquement datables. Il s'oppose +à toute tentation de normativité rigide ou de formalisme abstrait, et +impose au contraire une lecture située, pluraliste, géo-historique des +configurations politiques. -C’est là un point d’équilibre décisif : Le paradigme archicratique n’est ni relativiste ni essentialiste. Il ne prétend pas que tout se vaut, que tout est contextuel, que toute régulation est incommensurable à une autre. Il postule au contraire une structure fonctionnelle minimale de toute régulation politique viable (*arcalité, cratialité, archicration*), mais il reconnaît la variabilité radicale des formats sous lesquels cette structure se donne à voir, à sentir, à habiter. +C'est là un point d'équilibre décisif : Le paradigme archicratique n'est +ni relativiste ni essentialiste. Il ne prétend pas que tout se vaut, que +tout est contextuel, que toute régulation est incommensurable à une +autre. Il postule au contraire une structure fonctionnelle minimale de +toute régulation politique viable (*arcalité, cratialité, +archicration*), mais il reconnaît la variabilité radicale des formats +sous lesquels cette structure se donne à voir, à sentir, à habiter. -L’*arcalité*, par exemple, peut être d’essence sacrée dans les sociétés théocratiques (charia, droit divin, clergé constitutionnel), juridique dans les États modernes (constitution, législation), scientifique dans les régulations contemporaines (données, modèles, protocoles), ou narrative dans les régimes symboliques ou mémoriels (récits de fondation, mythes nationaux). Sa forme change selon les épistémès, les cultures, les histoires politiques. Mais son rôle de fondement subsiste. +L'*arcalité*, par exemple, peut être d'essence sacrée dans les sociétés +théocratiques (charia, droit divin, clergé constitutionnel), juridique +dans les États modernes (constitution, législation), scientifique dans +les régulations contemporaines (données, modèles, protocoles), ou +narrative dans les régimes symboliques ou mémoriels (récits de +fondation, mythes nationaux). Sa forme change selon les épistémès, les +cultures, les histoires politiques. Mais son rôle de fondement subsiste. -La *cratialité*, elle aussi, varie fortement : dans une monarchie absolutiste, elle passe par la cour, les ordonnances, les agents du roi ; dans un État moderne, par la bureaucratie, les lois d’exécution, la logistique administrative ; dans une économie néolibérale, par le marché, les plateformes, les algorithmes, les signaux de prix. Dans certains contextes, la c*ratialité* est concentrée (armée, police, haut fonctionnariat) ; dans d’autres, elle est distribuée (réseaux, *smart contracts*, objets connectés, délégations multiples). Mais dans tous les cas, elle opère. +La *cratialité*, elle aussi, varie fortement : dans une monarchie +absolutiste, elle passe par la cour, les ordonnances, les agents du roi +; dans un État moderne, par la bureaucratie, les lois d'exécution, la +logistique administrative ; dans une économie néolibérale, par le +marché, les plateformes, les algorithmes, les signaux de prix. Dans +certains contextes, la c*ratialité* est concentrée (armée, police, haut +fonctionnariat) ; dans d'autres, elle est distribuée (réseaux, *smart +contracts*, objets connectés, délégations multiples). Mais dans tous les +cas, elle opère. -L’*archicration*, enfin, est sans doute la dimension la plus sensible à cette variabilité différentielle. Dans certaines sociétés, elle prend la forme de délibérations démocratiques formelles ; dans d’autres, elle se manifeste dans des rituels coutumiers, des médiations locales, des négociations informelles. Parfois, elle est incarnée dans des institutions (juridictions, instances de régulation, commissions indépendantes) ; ailleurs, elle est extrajudiciaire, médiatique, contestataire. Il arrive même qu’elle soit migrante, déplacée hors des circuits officiels — dans l’espace public, les réseaux sociaux, les tribunaux d’opinion, les contre-expertises citoyennes. Ce qui compte, ce n’est pas sa forme, mais son effectivité : *existe-t-il un lieu, un temps, une procédure pour contester, pour ralentir, pour disputer la régulation ?* +L'*archicration*, enfin, est sans doute la dimension la plus sensible à +cette variabilité différentielle. Dans certaines sociétés, elle prend la +forme de délibérations démocratiques formelles ; dans d'autres, elle se +manifeste dans des rituels coutumiers, des médiations locales, des +négociations informelles. Parfois, elle est incarnée dans des +institutions (juridictions, instances de régulation, commissions +indépendantes) ; ailleurs, elle est extrajudiciaire, médiatique, +contestataire. Il arrive même qu'elle soit migrante, déplacée hors des +circuits officiels — dans l'espace public, les réseaux sociaux, les +tribunaux d'opinion, les contre-expertises citoyennes. Ce qui compte, ce +n'est pas sa forme, mais son effectivité : *existe-t-il un lieu, un +temps, une procédure pour contester, pour ralentir, pour disputer la +régulation ?* -Cet axiome implique donc une lecture topologique et comparative du politique. Il oblige à contextualiser chaque analyse, à éviter les jugements hâtifs (du type : « il n’y a pas de scène politique en Chine », ou « la régulation algorithmique n’est pas politique »), et à toujours s’interroger sur la forme spécifique que prend la *triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration* dans un contexte donné. +Cet axiome implique donc une lecture topologique et comparative du +politique. Il oblige à contextualiser chaque analyse, à éviter les +jugements hâtifs (du type : « il n'y a pas de scène politique en Chine +», ou « la régulation algorithmique n'est pas politique »), et à +toujours s'interroger sur la forme spécifique que prend la *triade +arcalité–cratialité–archicration* dans un contexte donné. -Il appelle aussi à penser les effets de mutation historique : un même dispositif peut changer de régime en changeant de forme. Un texte constitutionnel peut devenir pur symbole s’il n’est plus opposable ; une procédure algorithmique peut acquérir une force cratiale inattendue dès lors qu’elle structure massivement des décisions ; une consultation participative peut devenir archicrative à condition d’être réellement suivie d’effets. La variabilité est aussi dynamique. +Il appelle aussi à penser les effets de mutation historique : un même +dispositif peut changer de régime en changeant de forme. Un texte +constitutionnel peut devenir pur symbole s'il n'est plus opposable ; une +procédure algorithmique peut acquérir une force cratiale inattendue dès +lors qu'elle structure massivement des décisions ; une consultation +participative peut devenir archicrative à condition d'être réellement +suivie d'effets. La variabilité est aussi dynamique. -C’est ce qui permet au paradigme archicratique de circuler analytiquement entre différentes époques, sociétés et systèmes politiques sans tomber dans l’anachronisme ni l’ethnocentrisme. On peut analyser les rites de décision dans une chefferie kanak, les procès publics dans la Rome antique, les plateformes de gouvernance dans une *smart city*, les logiques de coordination dans une organisation supranationale, et y chercher les *formes spécifiques d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration* — sans supposer leurs configurations ou leurs schémas. +C'est ce qui permet au paradigme archicratique de circuler +analytiquement entre différentes époques, sociétés et systèmes +politiques sans tomber dans l'anachronisme ni l'ethnocentrisme. On peut +analyser les rites de décision dans une chefferie kanak, les procès +publics dans la Rome antique, les plateformes de gouvernance dans une +*smart city*, les logiques de coordination dans une organisation +supranationale, et y chercher les *formes spécifiques d'arcalité, de +cratialité et d'archicration* — sans supposer leurs configurations ou +leurs schémas. -Mais cette variabilité n’est pas un relativisme mou. Car à chaque configuration, on peut poser des questions structurantes : *Où est le fondement ? Par quoi cela opère ? Où et comment cela peut-il être mis à l’épreuve ? Qui fonde, qui opère, qui conteste ? Quels sont les objets, les figures, les temporalités impliquées ?* +Mais cette variabilité n'est pas un relativisme mou. Car à chaque +configuration, on peut poser des questions structurantes : *Où est le +fondement ? Par quoi cela opère ? Où et comment cela peut-il être mis à +l'épreuve ? Qui fonde, qui opère, qui conteste ? Quels sont les objets, +les figures, les temporalités impliquées ?* -Ce sont ces questions qui donnent sa force diagnostic au paradigme archicratique. Et c’est l’*axiome de variabilité différentielle* qui garantit que cette force ne se transforme pas en dogme : en reconnaissant la diversité des formes, il préserve la fécondité critique du cadre sans figer ses objets. +Ce sont ces questions qui donnent sa force diagnostic au paradigme +archicratique. Et c'est l'*axiome de variabilité différentielle* qui +garantit que cette force ne se transforme pas en dogme : en +reconnaissant la diversité des formes, il préserve la fécondité critique +du cadre sans figer ses objets. -En somme, il n’y a pas un seul modèle d’*arcalité*, de *cratialité* ou d’*archicration*. Il y a une structure commune à toute régulation politique viable, mais ses modes d’incarnation sont toujours différenciés, pluralisés, situés. Cet axiome nous prémunit contre les généralisations abusives, les catégories trop occidentalo-centrées, les lectures unilinéaires de la modernité. Il nous impose de penser les régulations à partir de ce qu’elles font, non de ce qu’elles prétendent être — et de toujours articuler la forme et la fonction, la structure et la scène, le principe et le contexte. +En somme, il n'y a pas un seul modèle d'*arcalité*, de *cratialité* ou +d'*archicration*. Il y a une structure commune à toute régulation +politique viable, mais ses modes d'incarnation sont toujours +différenciés, pluralisés, situés. Cet axiome nous prémunit contre les +généralisations abusives, les catégories trop occidentalo-centrées, les +lectures unilinéaires de la modernité. Il nous impose de penser les +régulations à partir de ce qu'elles font, non de ce qu'elles prétendent +être — et de toujours articuler la forme et la fonction, la structure +et la scène, le principe et le contexte. -### 1.3.6 — Axiome d’incomplétude systémique +### 1.3.6 — Axiome d'incomplétude systémique -Aucune régulation n’est jamais totalement saturée : tout dispositif, si cohérent et efficace soit-il, comporte une zone de silence, un excédent d’indétermination, un reste non maîtrisé. L’*archicratie*, en tant que paradigme critique, intègre cette incomplétude comme une donnée constitutive du politique. +Aucune régulation n'est jamais totalement saturée : tout dispositif, si +cohérent et efficace soit-il, comporte une zone de silence, un excédent +d'indétermination, un reste non maîtrisé. L'*archicratie*, en tant que +paradigme critique, intègre cette incomplétude comme une donnée +constitutive du politique. -Cet axiome s’inscrit au croisement de trois traditions intellectuelles majeures : en logique, il résonne avec les théorèmes d’incomplétude de Gödel (1931), qui démontrent qu’un système formel cohérent ne peut être à la fois complet et consistant ; en psychanalyse, il fait écho à l’idée freudienne puis lacanienne de l’irréductibilité du manque dans la structuration du sujet ; en philosophie politique, il rejoint l’intuition lefortienne du vide du lieu du pouvoir : « il n’y a pas de substance du pouvoir, seulement sa mise en forme provisoire et contestable » (Lefort, *L’invention démocratique*, 1981). +Cet axiome s'inscrit au croisement de trois traditions intellectuelles +majeures : en logique, il résonne avec les théorèmes d'incomplétude de +Gödel (1931), qui démontrent qu'un système formel cohérent ne peut être +à la fois complet et consistant ; en psychanalyse, il fait écho à l'idée +freudienne puis lacanienne de l'irréductibilité du manque dans la +structuration du sujet ; en philosophie politique, il rejoint +l'intuition lefortienne du vide du lieu du pouvoir : « il n'y a pas de +substance du pouvoir, seulement sa mise en forme provisoire et +contestable » (Lefort, *L'invention démocratique*, 1981). -Appliqué à la régulation politique, cet axiome affirme que tout dispositif, même solidement fondé (*arcalité*), puissamment opérant (*cratialité*), et formellement controversable (*archicration*), contient une marge non effectuée, une part de non représenté, un point aveugle irréductible. Il n’existe pas de système parfaitement clos, intégralement justifié, absolument maîtrisé. Cette incomplétude n’est pas un défaut à corriger, mais une structure à reconnaître — et à assumer politiquement. +Appliqué à la régulation politique, cet axiome affirme que tout +dispositif, même solidement fondé (*arcalité*), puissamment opérant +(*cratialité*), et formellement controversable (*archicration*), +contient une marge non effectuée, une part de non représenté, un point +aveugle irréductible. Il n'existe pas de système parfaitement clos, +intégralement justifié, absolument maîtrisé. Cette incomplétude n'est +pas un défaut à corriger, mais une structure à reconnaître — et à +assumer politiquement. -Il faut ici opérer un retournement fondamental : le reste n’est pas l’erreur, le résidu ou l’imperfection d’un système en voie d’achèvement. Il est ce par quoi le politique se maintient ouvert, ce par quoi la contestation demeure possible, ce par quoi la conflictualité ne se résorbe jamais tout à fait. Ce que l’incomplétude désigne, c’est la condition d’habitabilité d’un ordre : un ordre totalement saturé, sans reste, sans hors-champ, sans excédent, serait un ordre totalitaire. +Il faut ici opérer un retournement fondamental : le reste n'est pas +l'erreur, le résidu ou l'imperfection d'un système en voie d'achèvement. +Il est ce par quoi le politique se maintient ouvert, ce par quoi la +contestation demeure possible, ce par quoi la conflictualité ne se +résorbe jamais tout à fait. Ce que l'incomplétude désigne, c'est la +condition d'habitabilité d'un ordre : un ordre totalement saturé, sans +reste, sans hors-champ, sans excédent, serait un ordre totalitaire. -Dans la réalité, cette incomplétude peut prendre plusieurs formes. Ce sont des écarts entre la norme affichée et l’application effective (lois inappliquées, règles contournées, zones d’ombre procédurales). Il peut s’agir de sujets non pris en compte dans un dispositif (populations sans statut, minorités silencieuses, besoins non modélisables). Cette incomplétude peut aussi refléter des effets secondaires non anticipés (externalités, rebonds systémiques, effets pervers) ; ou bien encore des désaccords indiscernables (controverses épistémiques persistantes, dilemmes moraux insolubles, conflits de valeurs). +Dans la réalité, cette incomplétude peut prendre plusieurs formes. Ce +sont des écarts entre la norme affichée et l'application effective (lois +inappliquées, règles contournées, zones d'ombre procédurales). Il peut +s'agir de sujets non pris en compte dans un dispositif (populations sans +statut, minorités silencieuses, besoins non modélisables). Cette +incomplétude peut aussi refléter des effets secondaires non anticipés +(externalités, rebonds systémiques, effets pervers) ; ou bien encore des +désaccords indiscernables (controverses épistémiques persistantes, +dilemmes moraux insolubles, conflits de valeurs). -Ce que ce paradigme permet, c’est de lire ces incomplétudes non comme accidents mais comme révélateurs. Dans une optique archicratique, le reste devient un objet politique à part entière. Il signe les limites d’un dispositif, les seuils de sa viabilité, les marges de sa contestation. Il est ce qui rend la *scène archicrative* toujours nécessaire : parce qu’il y a du reste, il y a lieu d’ouvrir, de discuter, de réviser, de reconfigurer pour permettre l’évolution. +Ce que ce paradigme permet, c'est de lire ces incomplétudes non comme +accidents mais comme révélateurs. Dans une optique archicratique, le +reste devient un objet politique à part entière. Il signe les limites +d'un dispositif, les seuils de sa viabilité, les marges de sa +contestation. Il est ce qui rend la *scène archicrative* toujours +nécessaire : parce qu'il y a du reste, il y a lieu d'ouvrir, de +discuter, de réviser, de reconfigurer pour permettre l'évolution. -Cette perspective a des conséquences majeures sur la manière d’évaluer les régulations. Elle interdit l’illusion d’un dispositif parfait, totalement efficient, entièrement maîtrisé. Elle impose une lecture critique constante, qui ne confond pas efficacité et légitimité, ni optimisation et justice. Elle nous invite à repérer les symptômes de saturation (fermeture des recours, opacité croissante, mimétisme institutionnel) comme des signes de régulation pathologique. +Cette perspective a des conséquences majeures sur la manière d'évaluer +les régulations. Elle interdit l'illusion d'un dispositif parfait, +totalement efficient, entièrement maîtrisé. Elle impose une lecture +critique constante, qui ne confond pas efficacité et légitimité, ni +optimisation et justice. Elle nous invite à repérer les symptômes de +saturation (fermeture des recours, opacité croissante, mimétisme +institutionnel) comme des signes de régulation pathologique. -Mais l’*axiome d’incomplétude systémique* joue aussi comme garde-fou contre une dérive inverse : celle d’un scepticisme intégral ou d’un cynisme paralysant. Ce n’est pas parce qu’aucun système n’est complet qu’il faut tous les rejeter. C’est au contraire parce qu’ils sont incomplets qu’ils doivent être disputés, évaluables, perfectibles. La démocratie, disait Jacques Rancière, n’est pas le régime du consensus, mais bien celui du *dissensus institué* — c’est-à-dire la reconnaissance explicite du caractère toujours provisoire, toujours contestable de l’ordre politique. +Mais l'*axiome d'incomplétude systémique* joue aussi comme garde-fou +contre une dérive inverse : celle d'un scepticisme intégral ou d'un +cynisme paralysant. Ce n'est pas parce qu'aucun système n'est complet +qu'il faut tous les rejeter. C'est au contraire parce qu'ils sont +incomplets qu'ils doivent être disputés, évaluables, perfectibles. La +démocratie, disait Jacques Rancière, n'est pas le régime du consensus, +mais bien celui du *dissensus institué* — c'est-à-dire la +reconnaissance explicite du caractère toujours provisoire, toujours +contestable de l'ordre politique. -Ainsi, l’*axiome d’incomplétude systémique* devient une clé de lecture herméneutique : il nous oblige à chercher les zones de silence, à interroger les objets métonymiques absents, à débusquer les asymétries invisibles. Il renforce l’importance de l’*archicration*, non comme supplément procédural, mais comme réponse structurelle à l’impossibilité de saturation. +Ainsi, l'*axiome d'incomplétude systémique* devient une clé de lecture +herméneutique : il nous oblige à chercher les zones de silence, à +interroger les objets métonymiques absents, à débusquer les asymétries +invisibles. Il renforce l'importance de l'*archicration*, non comme +supplément procédural, mais comme réponse structurelle à l'impossibilité +de saturation. -En philosophie politique, il est donc un principe de vigilance : toute régulation prétendant pouvoir se dispenser d’opposabilité est suspecte ; tout dispositif se présentant comme achevé est dangereux. L’incomplétude est la garantie du politique — non pas de l’ordre, mais de la possibilité de sa critique. +En philosophie politique, il est donc un principe de vigilance : toute +régulation prétendant pouvoir se dispenser d'opposabilité est suspecte ; +tout dispositif se présentant comme achevé est dangereux. L'incomplétude +est la garantie du politique — non pas de l'ordre, mais de la +possibilité de sa critique. -Cet axiome fonde également la dimension anti-dogmatique du paradigme archicratique. Ce dernier ne cherche pas à dire le tout du pouvoir, ni à fournir un modèle universel clos. Il se présente comme un outil d’analyse ouvert, prêt à être ajusté, amendé, contesté à son tour. Car lui aussi comporte un reste : ce qu’il ne voit pas encore, ce qu’il ne peut pas encore penser. Et c’est cette reconnaissance même de son incomplétude qui le rend intellectuellement habitable. +Cet axiome fonde également la dimension anti-dogmatique du paradigme +archicratique. Ce dernier ne cherche pas à dire le tout du pouvoir, ni à +fournir un modèle universel clos. Il se présente comme un outil +d'analyse ouvert, prêt à être ajusté, amendé, contesté à son tour. Car +lui aussi comporte un reste : ce qu'il ne voit pas encore, ce qu'il ne +peut pas encore penser. Et c'est cette reconnaissance même de son +incomplétude qui le rend intellectuellement habitable. -### 1.3.7 — Axiome d’épreuve critique +### 1.3.7 — Axiome d'épreuve critique -Tout paradigme qui prétend décrire les régulations politiques doit rendre possible sa propre mise à l’épreuve. Il doit produire des instruments de falsifiabilité, de critique interne et de différenciation analytique. +Tout paradigme qui prétend décrire les régulations politiques doit +rendre possible sa propre mise à l'épreuve. Il doit produire des +instruments de falsifiabilité, de critique interne et de différenciation +analytique. -Une régulation n’est réputée pleinement archicratique qu’à la condition de rendre possible une scène d’épreuve où les prétentions arcale et cratiale puissent être opposées, arbitrées et révisées. Les formes de cette contestation peuvent être publiques, instituées, rituelles, situées ou faiblement codifiées, pourvu qu’elles soient praticables, opposables et capables d’infléchir la régulation. +Une régulation n'est réputée pleinement archicratique qu'à la condition +de rendre possible une scène d'épreuve où les prétentions arcale et +cratiale puissent être opposées, arbitrées et révisées. Les formes de +cette contestation peuvent être publiques, instituées, rituelles, +situées ou faiblement codifiées, pourvu qu'elles soient praticables, +opposables et capables d'infléchir la régulation. -Il est une exigence trop oubliée des sciences sociales : un paradigme critique n’est pas une grille qui se plaque partout, mais une matrice qui se teste, s’affine et peut échouer. Toute proposition théorique sur le pouvoir, la régulation et l’opposabilité doit ainsi se soumettre à une exigence classique : sa capacité à être réfutée. Autrement dit, un paradigme qui s’appliquerait partout, tout le temps, sans jamais rencontrer de cas-limite, ne serait pas robuste : il serait vide. +Il est une exigence trop oubliée des sciences sociales : un paradigme +critique n'est pas une grille qui se plaque partout, mais une matrice +qui se teste, s'affine et peut échouer. Toute proposition théorique sur +le pouvoir, la régulation et l'opposabilité doit ainsi se soumettre à +une exigence classique : sa capacité à être réfutée. Autrement dit, un +paradigme qui s'appliquerait partout, tout le temps, sans jamais +rencontrer de cas-limite, ne serait pas robuste : il serait vide. -C’est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique, pour être recevable, doit se soumettre à sa propre épreuve critique. Il ne suffit pas de produire une grille séduisante : encore faut-il qu’elle distingue, qu’elle discrimine, qu’elle rate — autrement dit, qu’elle n’englobe pas tout sans reste. Ce que cet axiome institue, c’est la réflexivité obligatoire du cadre lui-même : il doit rendre possible la critique de ses propres postulats, la vérification de ses hypothèses, la possibilité d’en faire un usage précis, situé, contrôlé, opposable. +C'est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique, pour être recevable, doit se +soumettre à sa propre épreuve critique. Il ne suffit pas de produire une +grille séduisante : encore faut-il qu'elle distingue, qu'elle +discrimine, qu'elle rate — autrement dit, qu'elle n'englobe pas tout +sans reste. Ce que cet axiome institue, c'est la réflexivité obligatoire +du cadre lui-même : il doit rendre possible la critique de ses propres +postulats, la vérification de ses hypothèses, la possibilité d'en faire +un usage précis, situé, contrôlé, opposable. Trois conditions en découlent directement : -Le paradigme archicratique doit accepter des cas où il ne fonctionne pas. Il doit être possible d’identifier des dispositifs qui, bien que dépourvus d’une scène archicrative explicite, ne sont pas pour autant perçus comme illégitimes, opaques ou injustes. À l’inverse, il doit être possible de montrer que certaines scènes régulées — pourvues des trois pôles — échouent pourtant à produire un ordre juste ou viable. Ces contre-exemples sont cruciaux : ils signalent les limites du cadre, et permettent d’en renforcer la rigueur. +Le paradigme archicratique doit accepter des cas où il ne fonctionne +pas. Il doit être possible d'identifier des dispositifs qui, bien que +dépourvus d'une scène archicrative explicite, ne sont pas pour autant +perçus comme illégitimes, opaques ou injustes. À l'inverse, il doit être +possible de montrer que certaines scènes régulées — pourvues des trois +pôles — échouent pourtant à produire un ordre juste ou viable. Ces +contre-exemples sont cruciaux : ils signalent les limites du cadre, et +permettent d'en renforcer la rigueur. -Notre paradigme ne peut se contenter de projeter une critique externe sur les dispositifs régulés. Il doit aussi être capable de se relire lui-même, d’identifier ses propres angles morts, ses propres effets de cadrage, ses propres biais culturels, institutionnels, théoriques. Il doit intégrer, dans sa structure même, la possibilité de sa contestation. Cela suppose une posture de vigilance intellectuelle continue, mais aussi une méthodologie réflexive : usage situé, confrontation aux cas, circulation interdisciplinaire, réception contradictoire. Car un paradigme qui ne se discute pas, se discrédite. +Notre paradigme ne peut se contenter de projeter une critique externe +sur les dispositifs régulés. Il doit aussi être capable de se relire +lui-même, d'identifier ses propres angles morts, ses propres effets de +cadrage, ses propres biais culturels, institutionnels, théoriques. Il +doit intégrer, dans sa structure même, la possibilité de sa +contestation. Cela suppose une posture de vigilance intellectuelle +continue, mais aussi une méthodologie réflexive : usage situé, +confrontation aux cas, circulation interdisciplinaire, réception +contradictoire. Car un paradigme qui ne se discute pas, se discrédite. -Enfin, le paradigme doit démontrer sa capacité à produire des distinctions effectives, c’est-à-dire à différencier les dispositifs, à catégoriser les régulations, à qualifier des variations de structures et non simplement à répéter un même diagnostic vague. Il ne suffit pas de voir de l’archicratie partout ; il faut pouvoir dire : *où ? comment ? à quel degré ? dans quel état de bifurcation ? avec quels effets ?* +Enfin, le paradigme doit démontrer sa capacité à produire des +distinctions effectives, c'est-à-dire à différencier les dispositifs, à +catégoriser les régulations, à qualifier des variations de structures et +non simplement à répéter un même diagnostic vague. Il ne suffit pas de +voir de l'archicratie partout ; il faut pouvoir dire : *où ? comment ? à +quel degré ? dans quel état de bifurcation ? avec quels effets ?* -Ce que garantit cet axiome, c’est l’inscription du paradigme archicratique dans une éthique de la rigueur intellectuelle. Il ne se veut ni modèle universel, ni dénonciation automatique, ni théorème d’indignation permanente. Il se propose comme grille opératoire, comme outil d’enquête, comme diagnostic situé. Mais il n’a de valeur que s’il peut échouer. C’est dans cette capacité à reconnaître ses propres limites qu’il gagne sa crédibilité. +Ce que garantit cet axiome, c'est l'inscription du paradigme +archicratique dans une éthique de la rigueur intellectuelle. Il ne se +veut ni modèle universel, ni dénonciation automatique, ni théorème +d'indignation permanente. Il se propose comme grille opératoire, comme +outil d'enquête, comme diagnostic situé. Mais il n'a de valeur que s'il +peut échouer. C'est dans cette capacité à reconnaître ses propres +limites qu'il gagne sa crédibilité. -Ce que cet axiome protège, en somme, c’est la vitalité épistémique du paradigme, sa capacité à rester un instrument de lucidité, et non un prisme dogmatique. En science politique comme en philosophie politique, la vérité d’un cadre théorique tient moins à ce qu’il affirme, qu’à ce qu’il autorise à penser, à contester, à distinguer. C’est cette condition d’épreuve — toujours renouvelée — qui fait du paradigme archicratique un outil intellectuellement habitable. +Ce que cet axiome protège, en somme, c'est la vitalité épistémique du +paradigme, sa capacité à rester un instrument de lucidité, et non un +prisme dogmatique. En science politique comme en philosophie politique, +la vérité d'un cadre théorique tient moins à ce qu'il affirme, qu'à ce +qu'il autorise à penser, à contester, à distinguer. C'est cette +condition d'épreuve — toujours renouvelée — qui fait du paradigme +archicratique un outil intellectuellement habitable. -### 1.3.8 — Axiome d’opérabilité transversale +### 1.3.8 — Axiome d'opérabilité transversale -Un paradigme n’est valable que s’il résiste à l’épreuve des régimes. Un outil d’analyse n’est robuste que s’il traverse les configurations hétérogènes — monarchies, démocraties, technocraties, gouvernances hybrides — sans s’effondrer dans la généralité vide ou la contradiction interne. +Un paradigme n'est valable que s'il résiste à l'épreuve des régimes. Un +outil d'analyse n'est robuste que s'il traverse les configurations +hétérogènes — monarchies, démocraties, technocraties, gouvernances +hybrides — sans s'effondrer dans la généralité vide ou la +contradiction interne. -L’*archicratie* n’est pas une forme de régime politique — elle n’est pas un type au sens de la typologie wébérienne (monarchie, démocratie, autoritarisme). Elle ne désigne ni une structure institutionnelle, ni une idéologie, ni une culture politique. Elle est une modalité de régulation, un style d’agencement entre trois pôles — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — qui peut être observé à travers une variété de formes politiques. Ce que cet axiome affirme, c’est que le paradigme archicratique doit pouvoir être mobilisé comme méta-régime de régulation : +L'*archicratie* n'est pas une forme de régime politique — elle n'est +pas un type au sens de la typologie wébérienne (monarchie, démocratie, +autoritarisme). Elle ne désigne ni une structure institutionnelle, ni +une idéologie, ni une culture politique. Elle est une modalité de +régulation, un style d'agencement entre trois pôles — *arcalité, +cratialité, archicration* — qui peut être observé à travers une +variété de formes politiques. Ce que cet axiome affirme, c'est que le +paradigme archicratique doit pouvoir être mobilisé comme méta-régime de +régulation : -- dans des régimes démocratiques libéraux (ex. UE, États-Unis) : où l’*arcalité* est pluraliste, la *cratialité* technicisée, et l’*archicration* souvent mimée ou saturée ; +- dans des régimes démocratiques libéraux (ex. UE, États-Unis) : où + l'*arcalité* est pluraliste, la *cratialité* technicisée, et + l'*archicration* souvent mimée ou saturée ; -- dans des régimes autoritaires (ex. Russie, Chine) : où la *cratialité* peut être sur-déterminée, l’*arcalité* mythifiée ou militarisée, et l’*archicration* strictement encadrée ou supprimée ; +- dans des régimes autoritaires (ex. Russie, Chine) : où la *cratialité* + peut être sur-déterminée, l'*arcalité* mythifiée ou militarisée, et + l'*archicration* strictement encadrée ou supprimée ; -- dans des gouvernances post-souveraines (ex. plateformes transnationales, régulations climatiques globales) : où les trois pôles sont éclatés, distribués, externalisés, mais où l’analyse archicratique permet justement de recomposer la carte régulatrice ; +- dans des gouvernances post-souveraines (ex. plateformes + transnationales, régulations climatiques globales) : où les trois + pôles sont éclatés, distribués, externalisés, mais où l'analyse + archicratique permet justement de recomposer la carte régulatrice ; -- dans des configurations historiques (ex. Église catholique médiévale, Empire ottoman, URSS) : où l’*arcalité* religieuse, impériale ou idéologique cohabitait avec des *cratialités* bureaucratiques puissantes, mais des *archicrations* fermées ou clandestines. +- dans des configurations historiques (ex. Église catholique médiévale, + Empire ottoman, URSS) : où l'*arcalité* religieuse, impériale ou + idéologique cohabitait avec des *cratialités* bureaucratiques + puissantes, mais des *archicrations* fermées ou clandestines. -Cette transversalité n’est pas un luxe intellectuel, elle est la condition de la valeur heuristique du paradigme. Un cadre qui ne fonctionne que pour les démocraties occidentales technocratisées, ou uniquement pour l’État-nation, échoue à devenir un paradigme. Il reste un commentaire situé. Ce que nous visons ici, c’est une grammaire de régulation minimale, structurelle mais non structurante, qui ne présuppose aucun régime idéal, aucun sujet politique donné, aucune culture spécifique. +Cette transversalité n'est pas un luxe intellectuel, elle est la +condition de la valeur heuristique du paradigme. Un cadre qui ne +fonctionne que pour les démocraties occidentales technocratisées, ou +uniquement pour l'État-nation, échoue à devenir un paradigme. Il reste +un commentaire situé. Ce que nous visons ici, c'est une grammaire de +régulation minimale, structurelle mais non structurante, qui ne +présuppose aucun régime idéal, aucun sujet politique donné, aucune +culture spécifique. -Cependant, cette opérabilité transversale ne doit pas conduire à la dilution du cadre. Pour que le paradigme soit valide, il faut que l’application de ses trois pôles ne soit jamais arbitraire, mais toujours décrite, analysable, vérifiable, située. La transversalité est une épreuve, non un relâchement. Elle nous impose de tester : que l’*arcalité* ne soit pas une pure invocation culturelle, mais un objet ou une trace repérable dans les pratiques, les textes, les institutions ; que la *cratialité* ne soit pas réduite à « ce qui agit », mais à ce qui structure, transforme, opère en lien avec une normativité fondée ; que l’*archicration* ne soit pas confondue avec le débat informel ou l’espace public diffus, mais définie comme scène, temporalité ou instance d’épreuve. +Cependant, cette opérabilité transversale ne doit pas conduire à la +dilution du cadre. Pour que le paradigme soit valide, il faut que +l'application de ses trois pôles ne soit jamais arbitraire, mais +toujours décrite, analysable, vérifiable, située. La transversalité est +une épreuve, non un relâchement. Elle nous impose de tester : que +l'*arcalité* ne soit pas une pure invocation culturelle, mais un objet +ou une trace repérable dans les pratiques, les textes, les institutions +; que la *cratialité* ne soit pas réduite à « ce qui agit », mais à ce +qui structure, transforme, opère en lien avec une normativité fondée ; +que l'*archicration* ne soit pas confondue avec le débat informel ou +l'espace public diffus, mais définie comme scène, temporalité ou +instance d'épreuve. -Autrement dit, l’opérabilité transversale ne signifie pas qu’on puisse « voir de l’archicratie partout ». Elle signifie que dans chaque situation de régulation, si les trois pôles peuvent être analysés sans contradiction, identifiés sans ambiguïté, et mis en tension sans réduction, alors le paradigme est opératoire. +Autrement dit, l'opérabilité transversale ne signifie pas qu'on puisse « +voir de l'archicratie partout ». Elle signifie que dans chaque situation +de régulation, si les trois pôles peuvent être analysés sans +contradiction, identifiés sans ambiguïté, et mis en tension sans +réduction, alors le paradigme est opératoire. -Dans un monde où les formes de régulation se disséminent hors des États, où les régimes hybrides prolifèrent, où la souveraineté se dilue, penser politiquement exige de disposer de cadres qui ne se contentent pas d’être normatifs ou régionalement valides. Le paradigme archicratique propose ici une grille de lecture qui traverse les institutions, sans en présupposer la forme. Il est donc a-régime, mais non a-politique. Il permet une critique sans nostalgie de l’État, une lecture des dispositifs sans fixisme institutionnel, une analyse sans ethnocentrisme. +Dans un monde où les formes de régulation se disséminent hors des États, +où les régimes hybrides prolifèrent, où la souveraineté se dilue, penser +politiquement exige de disposer de cadres qui ne se contentent pas +d'être normatifs ou régionalement valides. Le paradigme archicratique +propose ici une grille de lecture qui traverse les institutions, sans en +présupposer la forme. Il est donc a-régime, mais non a-politique. Il +permet une critique sans nostalgie de l'État, une lecture des +dispositifs sans fixisme institutionnel, une analyse sans +ethnocentrisme. -Cet axiome verrouille la capacité du paradigme à ne pas se refermer sur lui-même. Il garantit qu’il reste intellectuellement habitable pour qui veut analyser une réforme locale, un traité climatique, une base militaire, une autorité administrative indépendante ou une entreprise transnationale. +Cet axiome verrouille la capacité du paradigme à ne pas se refermer sur +lui-même. Il garantit qu'il reste intellectuellement habitable pour qui +veut analyser une réforme locale, un traité climatique, une base +militaire, une autorité administrative indépendante ou une entreprise +transnationale. -Si les autres axiomes définissent la structure du paradigme, celui-ci assure sa portée. Il ne vaut pas partout, mais peut valoir en tout lieu — à condition d’en faire l’usage rigoureux, situé et différencié qu’il requiert. +Si les autres axiomes définissent la structure du paradigme, celui-ci +assure sa portée. Il ne vaut pas partout, mais peut valoir en tout lieu — à condition d'en faire l'usage rigoureux, situé et différencié qu'il +requiert. ### La discipline de pensée du paradigme archicratique -Les huit axiomes qui précèdent fixent la discipline minimale du paradigme archicratique. Les premiers en établissent la structure irréductible : toute régulation comporte, en acte ou en creux, une arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration ; aucune de ces prises ne peut être confondue avec les deux autres sans produire une cécité analytique ou une pathologie politique. +Les huit axiomes qui précèdent fixent la discipline minimale du +paradigme archicratique. Les premiers en établissent la structure +irréductible : toute régulation comporte, en acte ou en creux, une +arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration ; aucune de ces prises ne +peut être confondue avec les deux autres sans produire une cécité +analytique ou une pathologie politique. -Les suivants en assurent la prise empirique et la portée critique : les pôles laissent des traces, se manifestent dans des objets, des pratiques, des procédures et des scènes qu’une enquête rigoureuse peut documenter ; leur déséquilibre, leur neutralisation ou leur hypertrophie permettent de qualifier des formes différenciées de dérive, d’impuissance ou de clôture. +Les suivants en assurent la prise empirique et la portée critique : les +pôles laissent des traces, se manifestent dans des objets, des +pratiques, des procédures et des scènes qu'une enquête rigoureuse peut +documenter ; leur déséquilibre, leur neutralisation ou leur hypertrophie +permettent de qualifier des formes différenciées de dérive, +d'impuissance ou de clôture. -Les derniers, enfin, en garantissent la robustesse théorique : la triade varie selon les contextes sans perdre sa fonction structurale ; aucune régulation n’épuise totalement ce qu’elle prétend ordonner ; et le paradigme lui-même ne vaut qu’à la condition de se soumettre à l’épreuve de la différenciation, de la réfutation et de la transposition située. +Les derniers, enfin, en garantissent la robustesse théorique : la triade +varie selon les contextes sans perdre sa fonction structurale ; aucune +régulation n'épuise totalement ce qu'elle prétend ordonner ; et le +paradigme lui-même ne vaut qu'à la condition de se soumettre à l'épreuve +de la différenciation, de la réfutation et de la transposition située. -Pris ensemble, ces axiomes dessinent moins un catéchisme conceptuel qu’une exigence de probité intellectuelle. Ils donnent au paradigme archicratique sa cohérence, sa falsifiabilité et sa puissance critique ; ils fixent surtout le seuil à partir duquel nos analyses peuvent être tenues pour recevables. C’est à leur lumière qu’il faut désormais lire la grammaire topologique des pôles, les formes dynamiques de leur articulation, les repères heuristiques de l’archicratie et les morphologies régulatrices qui en dérivent. +Pris ensemble, ces axiomes dessinent moins un catéchisme conceptuel +qu'une exigence de probité intellectuelle. Ils donnent au paradigme +archicratique sa cohérence, sa falsifiabilité et sa puissance critique ; +ils fixent surtout le seuil à partir duquel nos analyses peuvent être +tenues pour recevables. C'est à leur lumière qu'il faut désormais lire +la grammaire topologique des pôles, les formes dynamiques de leur +articulation, les repères heuristiques de l'archicratie et les +morphologies régulatrices qui en dérivent. -Une formalisation synthétique de ces axiomes, sous forme de tableau opératoire, est proposée en annexe, afin d’en faciliter la mobilisation comparative et l’épreuve empirique. +Une formalisation synthétique de ces axiomes, sous forme de tableau +opératoire, est proposée en annexe, afin d'en faciliter la mobilisation +comparative et l'épreuve empirique. -## **1.4 —** La grammaire topologique interne/externe de l’*archicratie* +## **1.4 —** La grammaire topologique interne/externe de l'*archicratie* -Penser la régulation politique dans le cadre du paradigme archicratique impose un effort particulier : il ne suffit pas de décrire des dispositifs ou de catégoriser des fonctions ; encore faut-il comprendre comment ces dispositifs se structurent, s’adossent et s’articulent à des sources, à des normes, à des injonctions ou à des milieux. Ce que nous nommons ici « grammaire topologique » désigne cette capacité à analyser les positions relatives qu’occupent les éléments constitutifs d’un ordre régulateur — et notamment à distinguer, sans les essentialiser, ce qui relève de l’interne et ce qui procède de l’externe. Ce n’est ni une cartographie géographique, ni une dichotomie ontologique : c’est une syntaxe relationnelle, une mise en tension structurante, un outil d’intelligibilité différenciée des régulations contemporaines. +Penser la régulation politique dans le cadre du paradigme archicratique +impose un effort particulier : il ne suffit pas de décrire des +dispositifs ou de catégoriser des fonctions ; encore faut-il comprendre +comment ces dispositifs se structurent, s'adossent et s'articulent à des +sources, à des normes, à des injonctions ou à des milieux. Ce que nous +nommons ici « grammaire topologique » désigne cette capacité à analyser +les positions relatives qu'occupent les éléments constitutifs d'un ordre +régulateur — et notamment à distinguer, sans les essentialiser, ce qui +relève de l'interne et ce qui procède de l'externe. Ce n'est ni une +cartographie géographique, ni une dichotomie ontologique : c'est une +syntaxe relationnelle, une mise en tension structurante, un outil +d'intelligibilité différenciée des régulations contemporaines. -L’interne ne renvoie pas ici à un contenu clos, endogène ou autosuffisant, mais à ce qui est produit, référé ou assumé par le dispositif lui-même. L’externe, quant à lui, ne désigne pas seulement ce qui vient d’ailleurs, mais ce qui est projeté, greffé, imposé ou hérité depuis une altérité institutionnelle, normative, technique ou symbolique. Aucun de ces deux termes ne doit donc être compris comme une nature ou comme un état figé : il faut les saisir comme des positions fonctionnelles, dynamiques, susceptibles de se déplacer, de se brouiller et parfois de s’inverser. +L'interne ne renvoie pas ici à un contenu clos, endogène ou +autosuffisant, mais à ce qui est produit, référé ou assumé par le +dispositif lui-même. L'externe, quant à lui, ne désigne pas seulement ce +qui vient d'ailleurs, mais ce qui est projeté, greffé, imposé ou hérité +depuis une altérité institutionnelle, normative, technique ou +symbolique. Aucun de ces deux termes ne doit donc être compris comme une +nature ou comme un état figé : il faut les saisir comme des positions +fonctionnelles, dynamiques, susceptibles de se déplacer, de se brouiller +et parfois de s'inverser. -Cette distinction est devenue décisive dans les régulations contemporaines. Celles-ci ne s’adossent plus seulement à des sources internes de légitimation et à des moyens propres d’exécution ; elles sont traversées par des standards globaux, des logiciels propriétaires, des normes transnationales, des protocoles techniques, des dispositifs d’audit ou de certification qui reconfigurent de l’intérieur leurs conditions de fonctionnement. Le brouillage entre l’interne et l’externe n’est pas un phénomène secondaire : il est l’un des lieux mêmes où se joue aujourd’hui la lisibilité politique de la régulation. +Cette distinction est devenue décisive dans les régulations +contemporaines. Celles-ci ne s'adossent plus seulement à des sources +internes de légitimation et à des moyens propres d'exécution ; elles +sont traversées par des standards globaux, des logiciels propriétaires, +des normes transnationales, des protocoles techniques, des dispositifs +d'audit ou de certification qui reconfigurent de l'intérieur leurs +conditions de fonctionnement. Le brouillage entre l'interne et l'externe +n'est pas un phénomène secondaire : il est l'un des lieux mêmes où se +joue aujourd'hui la lisibilité politique de la régulation. -La grammaire topologique a précisément pour fonction de restituer cette lisibilité. Elle permet de lire chacun des trois pôles — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — selon la manière dont il s’ancre, circule, se déplace, s’impose ou se dispute. L’enjeu n’est donc pas de distribuer des essences, mais de cartographier des prises. C’est à cette condition seulement qu’une critique des régulations contemporaines peut redevenir située, informée et politiquement opérante. +La grammaire topologique a précisément pour fonction de restituer cette +lisibilité. Elle permet de lire chacun des trois pôles — arcalité, +cratialité, archicration — selon la manière dont il s'ancre, circule, +se déplace, s'impose ou se dispute. L'enjeu n'est donc pas de distribuer +des essences, mais de cartographier des prises. C'est à cette condition +seulement qu'une critique des régulations contemporaines peut redevenir +située, informée et politiquement opérante. ### 1.4.1 — *Arcalités internes* : fondations auto-instituées, justifications endogènes et incarnations professionnelles -Les arcalités internes constituent, au sein du paradigme archicratique, l’un des socles les plus subtils et les plus décisifs de toute configuration régulatrice. Elles désignent l’ensemble des justifications, principes, mythes, normes, récits ou codes qui émanent du dispositif lui-même, sans recours explicite à une autorité extérieure, surplombante ou transcendante. Ces fondements endogènes opèrent comme auto-invocations de légitimation : ils confèrent à l’ordre institué sa prétention à se suffire, à s’auto-justifier, à s’auto-garantir. Ils incarnent ce que Cornelius Castoriadis nomme l’auto-institution de la société, c’est-à-dire la capacité d’un collectif à poser ses propres significations imaginaires comme fondatrices, sans autre fondement que l’institution même du sens (Castoriadis, *L’institution imaginaire de la société*, 1975). - -Mais ces arcalités ne sont pas des abstractions désincarnées. Elles vivent par des figures humaines situées, au sein d’institutions et de professions qui en assurent la formulation, la transmission, la ritualisation ou la mise en récit. Toute arcalité interne suppose ainsi une communauté de portage : juristes, formateurs, responsables éthiques, pairs reconnus, anciens, référents professionnels, tous ceux qui font tenir un fondement en le transmettant, en le réactivant ou en l’invoquant dans l’usage. - -À ce socle incarné s’ajoutent des formes plus discrètes, souvent non verbalisées, par lesquelles un collectif stabilise un mode de coordination implicite : postures partagées, rythmes gestuels, configurations d’attention communes. Ces régulations ne passent ni par l’argumentation ni par le commandement, mais par une grammaire incorporée de la convenance et de la présence. Elles ne remplacent pas l’arcalité formulée ; elles en constituent souvent le soubassement pratique. - -Ce niveau basal de l’*arcalité* interne révèle que tout fondement institué suppose aussi une économie de la présence, une grammaire implicite de la coprésence ajustée. - -Ainsi, ce que cette section vise à démontrer, c’est que dans tout système régulateur, il existe des formes instituées de légitimation qui proviennent de l’intérieur, portées par des acteurs situés, incarnées dans des objets ou des rituels, et investies comme sources de validité. Cette légitimation endogène peut s’inscrire dans une diversité de supports matériels ou immatériels : une charte d’éthique co-rédigée en assemblée interne, un serment professionnel prononcé lors d’un rite d’entrée dans la profession, une devise affichée dans les locaux, une archive fondatrice mobilisée lors des formations, ou encore une mémoire orale transmise entre anciens et nouveaux membres d’un collectif de métier. - -Le critère déterminant est double. D’une part, ces *arcalité*s doivent procéder du dispositif lui-même — être issues de son histoire, de son organisation, de ses acteurs, et non être imposées par une norme externe ou importée. D’autre part, elles doivent opérer comme principe de justification réel : donner sens, orienter l’action, encadrer l’usage du pouvoir ou limiter l’exercice de la force régulatrice. - -Prenons l’exemple paradigmatique du serment professionnel. Le serment d’Hippocrate, dans sa version contemporaine prononcée à l’entrée de la profession médicale, fonctionne comme une *arcalité* *interne* typique : il est porté par la profession elle-même, transmis par les pairs, encadré par des corps intermédiaires comme les ordres ou les facultés, et considéré comme source de légitimité pour la pratique médicale. De même, une charte de l’enseignant-chercheur élaborée collectivement et approuvée par une instance collégiale, produit une *arcalité* endogène : elle incarne une norme professionnelle non imposée, mais assumée comme auto-régulation éthique. - -Mais il serait erroné de réduire ces *arcalité*s *internes* à des énoncés symboliques ou des proclamations solennelles. Elles prennent des formes multiples, parfois discrètes, parfois ritualisées, toujours incarnées. Un règlement intérieur signé collectivement, une cérémonie d’accueil des nouveaux membres, une archive fondatrice revisitée à chaque crise, un rite de passage professionnel (comme la soutenance de thèse ou la titularisation), une parole d’ancien transmise à un jeune collègue : tous ces éléments participent de la fabrication arcale — à condition d’être reconnus comme tels par ceux qui les produisent, les transmettent et les vivent. - -Ces formes différenciées d’*arcalité interne* peuvent être typologisées selon leurs vecteurs d’incarnation, sans prétendre à l’exhaustivité : - -- *Juridico-normative* : normes internes, statuts fondateurs, corpus doctrinaux élaborés par les agents du dispositif. Ce sont les directions juridiques internes, les commissions de rédaction, les cellules de régulation qui les élaborent, avec l’appui de professionnels de terrain. - -- *Symbolico-rituelle* : gestes d’institution, prestations de serment, cérémonies internes. Ces rituels impliquent des figures humaines précises : maîtres de cérémonie, autorités symboliques, garants de la tradition. - -- *Éthique professionnelle* : codes de déontologie rédigés par des collèges internes, charte des valeurs débattue en équipe, engagements co-signés. Ici, ce sont les communautés professionnelles, les collectifs de métiers, les cercles de pairs qui en assurent la légitimation. - -- *Historico-organisationnelle* : récits fondateurs conservés dans des archives, affichés dans les locaux, transmis par les aînés. Ces mythes d’origine, portés par les doyens, les secrétaires généraux, les figures charismatiques internes, stabilisent l’identité collective. - -- *Cognitivo-formative* : doctrines internes formalisées par des départements de formation ou des cercles de transmission. Il s’agit ici des formateurs internes, des tuteurs, des référents pédagogiques qui assurent la pérennité doctrinale du dispositif. - -Ce qui se joue, politiquement, dans cette cartographie incarnée, c’est la capacité d’un collectif à produire ses propres règles de légitimation et à les faire vivre par ses membres. Mais c’est aussi, et surtout, la possibilité de questionner ces règles : *sont-elles effectives ou simulées ? Portées ou abandonnées ? Sont-elles intégrées par les nouveaux arrivants ? Sont-elles citées en cas de conflit ? Sont-elles mobilisées dans les processus de révision ou de réforme ?* Car une *arcalité* n’est pas une substance ; c’est un acte, une scène, un usage. - -Ainsi, un règlement d’ordre intérieur affichant une « charte des valeurs » n’a de force arcale que si celle-ci est mobilisable dans une procédure de recours, évoquée lors d’une saisine, citée dans une délibération. Faute de quoi, elle devient un artefact symbolique décoratif, un simulacre de fondement. Le facteur humain est ici déterminant : sans porteur, pas d’opposabilité ; sans réactivation vivante, pas de légitimation durable. L’analyse archicratique ne peut donc se contenter de repérer des objets formels : elle doit identifier les porteurs humains, les scènes de transmission et les modalités de mobilisation. Elle doit examiner la performativité réelle de l’arcalité interne — sa capacité à agir dans le conflit, à fonder une norme, à structurer une mémoire et à encadrer une cratialité. - -Enfin, l’*arcalité interne* est une position topologique, non une essence. Un même objet peut être *arcalité interne* dans un dispositif — et devenir externe dans un autre contexte. Une charte professionnelle co-écrite par un collectif peut devenir norme externe lorsqu’elle est reprise comme standard par une instance ministérielle. D’où la nécessité d’une vigilance constante : l’interne se construit dans l’usage, dans l’incarnation, dans la revendication d’autonomie, et non dans la seule proximité géographique ou structurelle. - -Cette plasticité, cette mouvance, cette dépendance à des figures concrètes de légitimation, exigent un instrument d’analyse rigoureux. Nous en établirons les premiers jalons dynamiques dans la section 1.4.7 (sur les migrations topologiques), mais il faut d’ores et déjà affirmer ceci : sans portage humain, il n’y a pas d’*arcalité interne* ; sans transmission incarnée, il n’y a que texte mort ; sans usage opposable, il n’y a que vitrine. - -L’*arcalité interne* est ce par quoi un dispositif affirme sa capacité à se fonder par lui-même — dans ses signes, dans sa mémoire, dans ses figures professionnelles, dans ses pratiques rituelles. Mais elle n’est fondatrice que si elle est vécue, disputée et habitée. - -### 1.4.2 — *Arcalités externes* : fondements surplombants, légitimités exogènes et figures d’adossement - -Là où les arcalités internes émanent du cœur du dispositif et sont portées par ses membres, ses rites et ses récits, les arcalités externes procèdent d’une autre logique : elles s’imposent, s’importent ou se projettent depuis un ailleurs normatif. Ce sont des principes, normes, récits, doctrines, symboles ou références qui ne trouvent pas leur source dans le champ régulé lui-même, mais à l’extérieur de celui-ci — que cet extérieur soit juridique, scientifique, religieux, moral, civilisationnel, économique ou épistémique. L’*arcalité externe* est donc, d’un point de vue topologique, exogène au dispositif d’application, même si elle peut y être intégrée, traduite ou contestée. - -Historiquement, les arcalités externes ont toujours joué un rôle structurant dans la formation des ordres politiques. Qu’il s’agisse de droits impériaux, de référents religieux, de traités internationaux, de standards scientifiques ou de doctrines économiques globalisées, elles procèdent d’un ailleurs normatif que le dispositif ne produit pas lui-même. Mais cet ailleurs n’agit jamais seul : il doit être relayé, traduit, interprété, parfois contesté, par des acteurs situés. - -Le facteur humain est ici décisif. Diplomates, juristes, experts, formateurs, médiateurs, responsables institutionnels, professionnels de terrain : ce sont eux qui assurent la circulation concrète de l’arcalité externe, et qui conditionnent sa vitalité réelle. Sans ce travail de portage, de traduction et d’activation, le fondement demeure formel, décoratif ou inerte ; avec lui, il devient un principe effectivement régulateur, susceptible aussi d’être discuté dans ses usages et ses effets. - -Les normes sanitaires internationales offrent un exemple éclairant. La Déclaration d’Helsinki sur l’éthique médicale ou les recommandations de l’OMS n’ont d’effet réel qu’à travers leur mobilisation par des médecins hospitaliers, des directions d’établissements, des juristes de la santé ou des formateurs en bioéthique. Ce sont ces figures, au croisement de l’expertise et de l’action, qui assurent l’ancrage — ou, au contraire, l’exclusion — de l’arcalité dans la pratique. De même, les standards comptables IFRS ou les normes ISO sont activés, traduits ou contestés par des acteurs comptables, des auditeurs, des responsables qualité, des représentants syndicaux, ou encore des agents ministériels chargés de leur implémentation. - -Les formes différenciées d’*arcalités externes* peuvent dès lors être cartographiées en fonction de leurs vecteurs d’énonciation et de leurs agents de portage, que l’analyse archicratique doit repérer avec soin : - -- *Juridico-supranationales* : il s’agit des traités, conventions, accords, pactes et jurisprudences émanant d’institutions supranationales (ex. : CEDH, ONU, OMS, OMC). Ces *arcalités* sont portées localement par des juristes spécialisés, des diplomates, des délégués nationaux, des magistrats de liaison, et parfois même des ONG expertes. Elles créent des ponts — ou des dissonances — entre souverainetés locales et exigences universelles. - -- *Scientifico-techniques* : ces *arcalités* reposent sur des protocoles internationaux, des grilles de validation scientifique, ou des classifications globalisées (ex. : DSM, critères IPCC, codes de bioéthique, référentiels de bonnes pratiques). Elles sont relayées et stabilisées par des experts sectoriels, des chercheurs reconnus, des comités d’éthique, ou des agences d’évaluation qui assurent leur légitimité technique. - -- *Mythico-civilisationnelles* : certaines *arcalités* procèdent de récits globalement partagés, tels que les droits de l’homme, le progrès scientifique, la raison universelle ou la démocratie représentative. Ces références sont souvent portées par des intellectuels publics, des corps diplomatiques, des enseignants, des pédagogues ou des figures morales qui les transmettent comme horizon symbolique. - -- *Épistémiques* : certaines *arcalités* sont véhiculées par des savoirs naturalisés, tels que le management par objectif, l’innovation algorithmique ou la résilience institutionnelle. Ces doctrines circulent via des revues internationales, des *think tanks*, des consultants experts ou des corps intermédiaires intégrés à la régulation (ex. : cabinets de conseil accrédités, laboratoires de gouvernance, réseaux d’experts internationaux). - -- *Théologico-politiques* : enfin, certaines *arcalités* relèvent d’un ordre religieux ou spirituel transcendant (ex. : droit canon, charia codifiée, prescriptions rabbinique). Elles sont portées par des autorités spirituelles, des juristes religieux, des conseillers confessionnels, ou encore des communautés croyantes qui les revendiquent comme source supérieure d’organisation sociale. - -Le statut topologique de ces *arcalités externes* est fondamentalement dynamique. Une norme internationale peut être traduite, adaptée, appropriée — devenant ainsi partiellement internalisée. À l’inverse, un texte voté localement peut fonctionner comme *arcalité externe* s’il est calqué sur des standards importés sans discussion. Le critère de distinction n’est donc pas juridique, mais positionnel : ce qui compte, c’est le lieu d’énonciation, le degré de prise, le mode d’activation, la possibilité de dispute. - -En ce sens, l’analyse archicratique exige une vigilance accrue sur les conditions de circulation des *arcalités externes*. *Sont-elles appropriées ou imposées ? Sont-elles traduites ou fétichisées ? Qui les active ? Avec quelle compétence ? Pour quels effets ?* Le facteur humain est ici décisif : toute *arcalité externe* passe par un corps social d’activation, de transposition, d’incarnation — ou échoue à le faire, et devient alors un fondement mort, déconnecté, décoratif. - -Ainsi, l’inertie d’une *arcalité externe* n’est pas seulement un échec technique ou politique : c’est le symptôme d’une absence de portage humain effectif. À l’inverse, sa puissance régulatrice dépend de sa capacité à être habitée, interprétée, mobilisée, par des professionnels, des agents publics, des collectifs intermédiaires ou des figures institutionnelles. Il y a une condition anthropologique de l’*arcalité* : sans corps vivant, pas de fondement durable. - -Lorsque ces fondements exogènes sont naturalisés, dépolitisés ou rendus difficilement contestables, ils deviennent des vecteurs privilégiés de dérives autarchicratiques ou archicratistiques : leur autorité prétendue neutre masque l’impossibilité pratique de les discuter, de les traduire ou de les opposer. Ce n’est pas leur contenu qui pose problème, mais leur mode d’énonciation : lorsque la scène de justification est neutralisée, lorsque les délais de médiation sont comprimés ou rendus fictifs, lorsque les dispositifs de traduction deviennent inopérants, ces arcalités tendent à devenir des injonctions performatives opaques. - -C’est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique impose une exigence méthodologique claire : documenter le statut, le portage, l’activation et la contestation des *arcalités externes*. *Qui les invoque ? Qui les traduit ? Qui les fait vivre ? Sont-elles révisables ? Opposables ? Intégrées dans une scène ou dissoutes dans le dogme ?* La critique archicratique ne vise pas à disqualifier l’externe, mais à rendre visibles ses conditions d’incarnation. - -Une *arcalité externe* bien internalisée, portée par une communauté compétente, disputée dans ses effets, rendue visible dans ses limites, peut renforcer un ordre démocratique. Mais une *arcalité* exogène désincarnée, mimée, figée, peut devenir le vecteur sourd d’un pouvoir à scène neutralisée, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante. Le facteur humain, ici encore, est la clef de l’*arcalité vivante*. - -### 1.4.3 — *Cratialités internes* : opérativité endogène, chaînes d’exécution incarnées et pouvoir discret sans extériorité - -La *cratialité interne* constitue l’un des points névralgiques du paradigme archicratique. Elle ne se résume ni à l’action technique, ni à la simple application de normes venues d’ailleurs. Elle désigne la capacité d’un dispositif régulateur à produire lui-même, depuis l’intérieur, sa propre puissance opératoire, sans mobiliser explicitement une légitimation transcendante, et avec une scène d’épreuve devenue marginale, reléguée à l’arrière-plan ou pratiquement inopérante dans le cours ordinaire de l’exécution. En ce sens, l’interne n’est pas un dedans organique, mais une position topologique de clôture opératoire : là où la régulation tend à se suffire à elle-même, là où l’ordre d’exécution s’impose par l’inertie du dispositif, et là où le pouvoir agit comme s’il n’avait plus à se dire, à se justifier ni à se laisser reprendre. - -Ce qui distingue fondamentalement la cratialité interne, c’est son auto-suffisance apparente. Elle repose sur la densité cumulative des routines, des instruments, des protocoles, des langages, des procédures et — point décisif — des humains qui les activent, les maintiennent et les modulent. Car la cratialité interne n’est jamais une abstraction systémique désincarnée. Elle est portée par des agents, des métiers et des savoir-faire qui donnent forme, corps et continuité à l’action régulatrice. Elle est faite de gestes, de réflexes, de scripts mentaux, de hiérarchies tacites et de cultures professionnelles. En somme, elle est le produit vivant de celles et ceux qui opèrent. - -Les figures humaines centrales de la *cratialité interne* ne sont pas nécessairement visibles. Ce ne sont pas les gouvernants, les élus, les grands décisionnaires. Ce sont les cadres intermédiaires, les agents de contrôle, les gestionnaires de dossier, les chefs de service, les responsables de flux, les référents qualité, les techniciens de *back-office*, les ingénieurs système, les analystes financiers, les secrétaires d'instruction, les coordonnateurs logistiques, les rédacteurs de procédures. Ce sont eux qui assurent le maintien opérationnel des chaînes de décision et d'exécution, sans qu’une instance politique explicite ait besoin d’intervenir. En cela, ils incarnent une forme de pouvoir discret, souvent invisible, mais absolument décisif. - -Historiquement, cette montée en puissance de la *cratialité interne* est inséparable de la bureaucratisation rationalisée (Weber), du fonctionnalisme administratif (Crozier), et plus récemment, de la numérisation intégrale des régulations. Les systèmes informatiques de gestion, les progiciels de suivi, les tableaux de bord automatisés, les chaînes logistiques, les plateformes internes de décision, ont progressivement capturé les lieux où se joue la régulation concrète. Mais ce ne sont pas ces outils en eux-mêmes qui détiennent le pouvoir : c’est la manière dont ils sont habités, objets de routines, agencés, par des professionnels spécialisés — dont les gestes techniques se sont, peu à peu, substitués à la délibération explicite. - -Il est alors possible de distinguer, à titre opératoire, plusieurs formes de cratialité interne, selon les vecteurs d’action qu’elles mobilisent et les compétences humaines qu’elles requièrent : - -- **Procédurales** : chaînes d’instruction, logiques hiérarchiques, processus standards, checklists, référentiels qualité — incarnées par gestionnaires, cadres, chefs de projet, instructeurs de dossier, ceux qui assurent la régularité des opérations. - -- **Infrastructurelles** : réseaux techniques, bâtiments, salles de serveurs, bases de données locales, outils physiques — entretenus par techniciens, agents de maintenance, ingénieurs système, logisticiens, qui garantissent la continuité matérielle de la régulation. - -- **Algorithmico-fonctionnelles** : logiciels propriétaires, plateformes internes, interfaces de validation, moteurs de workflow — configurés et opérés par développeurs, analystes métiers, gestionnaires applicatifs, qui déterminent en pratique les possibilités d’action. - -- **Cognitivo-organisationnelles** : division des tâches, routines professionnelles, scripts mentaux — savoir-faire incorporés, tours de main, automatismes partagés, qui rendent l’action fluide sans être toujours formalisée. - -- **Langagières et discursives** : jargons techniques, syntaxes normalisées, grilles d’expression — maîtrisés par rédacteurs, formateurs, communicants, traducteurs techniques, qui donnent forme intelligible à la régulation. - -Ce qui fait la puissance silencieuse de cette cratialité interne, c’est qu’elle peut fonctionner comme si elle n’avait plus à répondre explicitement de ses justifications, et comme si la scène d’épreuve n’avait plus de prise effective sur son cours ordinaire. Tout semble déjà cadré, validé, formaté ; la régulation s’effectue dans la continuité des procédures, des outils et des gestes professionnels qui la portent. Elle n’est pas absolument sans arcalité ni sans archicration, mais celles-ci deviennent peu exposables, reléguées à l’arrière-plan, ou pratiquement inopérantes dans le cours ordinaire de l’exécution. - -C’est précisément cette fluidité sans extériorité qui devient politiquement problématique. Il n’y a plus de scène clairement praticable où s’adresser, plus de temporalité suffisante pour l’amendement, plus de responsabilité immédiatement localisable. Ce n’est pas ici l’illégalité qui domine, mais la fermeture autoréférentielle : le dispositif fonctionne, donc il se dispense de s’expliquer. - -Dans ses formes les plus avancées, cette cratialité interne tend à absorber le délibératif, le politique et le symbolique dans la logique même de l’exécution. L’interface remplace la réunion, le geste de validation remplace la justification, et la décision se trouve redistribuée dans des circuits scriptés, normés, régulés — par des humains qui n’en sont pas toujours les auteurs explicites, mais qui en assurent l’activation quotidienne. - -Ce n’est ni une dictature au sens classique, ni un simple abus de pouvoir. C’est un excès d’opérativité, une saturation de l’exécution, une extinction du différé. L’acte est effectué parce que le système est conçu pour cela, et parce qu’un agent, quelque part, l’a validé, routé ou exécuté sans avoir à en reprendre explicitement la pertinence. - -Face à cela, l’analyse archicratique doit entrer dans l’épaisseur des actes, des routines, des formats, des langages, des outils et des métiers. Car c’est dans ces gestes distribués, dans ces validations discrètes et dans ces corps professionnels spécialisés que se joue désormais une large part de la régulation politique contemporaine. La cratialité interne n’est pas une mécanique abstraite : elle est une matrice incarnée, à la fois matérielle et humaine, dont la puissance tient à ce qu’elle fait tenir l’ordre sans apparaître d’emblée comme pouvoir. - -### 1.4.4 — *Cratialités externes* : dépendances encodées, transferts d’opérativité et chaînes humaines déterritorialisées - -Si la *cratialité interne* décrit l’opérativité immanente, auto-structurée et incarnée dans les circuits de gestion, les routines professionnelles et les savoir-faire endogènes d’un dispositif régulateur, la *cratialité externe* désigne quant à elle une tout autre configuration : celle d’une puissance d’action déléguée, importée ou imposée depuis l’extérieur, mais activée en tant que levier effectif de transformation du réel à l’intérieur même du dispositif. Cette puissance est d’autant plus efficace qu’elle circule à bas bruit, dans les interstices du droit, dans les coulisses du pilotage, dans les interfaces contractuelles, dans les standards techniques. Mais elle est tout sauf abstraite : elle est portée, codée, rendue opératoire par des humains bien réels, agents de la régulation déterritorialisée. - -Historiquement, la cratialité externe s’inscrit dans une longue tradition de délégation, d’externalisation et de transfert d’opérativité. Mais ce qui en fait aujourd’hui une configuration politiquement décisive, ce n’est pas seulement son ancienneté : c’est que des instruments, des normes, des procédures et des architectures techniques conçus ailleurs viennent désormais structurer, de l’intérieur, ce qu’un dispositif peut effectivement faire. - -Dans le contexte contemporain, cette extériorisation de l’opérativité prend des formes multiples : logiciels de gestion conçus par des entreprises privées, plateformes d’allocation, dispositifs de notation, référentiels d’audit, protocoles d’évaluation, systèmes automatisés de reporting. Ces instruments ne sont pas produits par l’institution elle-même, mais ils s’intègrent à ses chaînes opératoires au point d’en reconfigurer les capacités effectives d’action, de décision et de priorisation. - -Cette régulation par instruments exogènes repose en outre sur des porteurs humains spécifiques, que l’analyse archicratique ne peut pas laisser dans l’ombre : consultants, intégrateurs de solutions numériques, responsables d’implémentation, auditeurs, experts en conformité, juristes contractuels, chefs de projet transversaux, évaluateurs mandatés. La cratialité externe n’est donc pas un pouvoir abstrait ; c’est une opérativité déterritorialisée, mais incarnée, qui agit moins par commandement visible que par paramétrage, intégration, cadrage et obligation d’exécution. - -On peut distinguer plusieurs formes typologiques de *cratialité externe*, selon les vecteurs d’opérativité mobilisés, et selon les figures humaines associées : - -- *Technologique* : logiciels, API, architectures SaaS, serveurs distants, systèmes de *machine learning*. Ces instruments sont développés, calibrés, ajustés par des équipes de développeurs, de chefs de produit, de *data scientists* travaillant à distance du dispositif régulé, mais impactant directement sa capacité à décider, à prioriser, à exécuter. - -- *Juridico-contractuelle* : clauses de marché public, obligations de résultat, indicateurs contractuellement imposés. Ici, le pouvoir opératoire réside dans les mains des juristes de cabinets spécialisés, *contract managers*, acheteurs publics, qui conçoivent les termes d’une régulation par contrat, où l’exécution devient une obligation pré-formatée. - -- *Normative* : adoption de référentiels techniques, d’indicateurs de qualité, de standards ISO. Ces normes sont souvent diffusées par des auditeurs externes, organismes certificateurs, experts métier qui, sans lien hiérarchique avec le dispositif régulé, déterminent pourtant les critères de sa conformité et de son efficience. - -- *Financière* : *cratialité* exercée par les financeurs — banques multilatérales, agences de financement, investisseurs conditionnels. Ce sont les chargés de mission, les experts en évaluation financière, les gestionnaires de portefeuille qui fixent les conditionnalités d’action, souvent en dehors de toute scène publique de justification. - -- *Organisationnelle* : influence d’agences de conseil, de *think tanks*, de cabinets en stratégie sur l’ingénierie organisationnelle des institutions publiques. Ici, ce sont les consultants en transformation, les designers de politiques publiques, les architectes de “réforme” qui pilotent le réel sans y apparaître comme autorités visibles. - -Ces acteurs opèrent la plupart du temps sous couvert d’assistance technique. Leur rôle est d’« aider à mieux faire », d’« optimiser les ressources », de « moderniser la gestion », de « rationaliser les coûts ». Mais cette rhétorique techniciste masque souvent une reconfiguration profonde du pouvoir décisionnel, où le cœur de l’opérativité glisse du politique vers l’ingénierie, du jugement vers la métrique, du débat vers le tableau de bord. - -Et surtout, cette délégation opère sans retour critique systématique. Car ces figures humaines ne relèvent ni du suffrage, ni du débat contradictoire, ni de la responsabilité institutionnelle directe. Elles sont contractualisées mais inamovibles, mandatées mais inaccessibles, présentes mais insaisissables dans le champ de la contestation politique. - -C’est pourquoi tout diagnostic archicratique sérieux doit documenter ces *cratialités externes* dans leur articulation humaine. Il ne suffit pas de dire qu’un logiciel est utilisé, qu’un standard est appliqué, qu’un cabinet a été mandaté. Il faut nommer les opérateurs, cartographier les chaînes de délégation, remonter les conditions d’élaboration des paramètres, tracer les circuits de validation, identifier les espaces de décision véritable. - -La vulnérabilité archicratique se joue alors dans l’impossibilité de reprendre la main sur ces instruments : quand le personnel interne ne peut pas modifier un algorithme, contester un référentiel, réécrire une clause contractuelle, redéfinir une grille d’évaluation, nous ne sommes plus dans la co-opérativité, mais dans la captation de l’action par extériorité. Non pas un pouvoir visible et contestable, mais une forme d’*imperium* discret, camouflé sous les traits de l’aide ou du progrès. - -L’enjeu, alors, n’est pas d’éliminer la *cratialité externe*, mais de la rendre contestable, traçable, amendable. Car ce qui fait la force — ou la dérive — d’un système régulateur, ce n’est pas seulement ce qu’il fait, mais comment il l’a décidé, et avec qui. Le facteur humain, dans les cratialités externes, est donc la clef oubliée de toute reprise démocratique du pilotage. Il est le point d’entrée de toute reprise politique sur les instruments devenus autonomes, et sur les décisions sans auteur identifié. - -### 1.4.5 — *Archicrations internes* : scènes d’épreuve encastrées, contre-pouvoirs situés et régulations instituées - -L’archicration interne désigne l’ensemble des mécanismes, instances, fonctions ou scènes qui permettent à un dispositif de s’auto-exposer à la critique, de s’interroger depuis l’intérieur, et de produire de l’ajustement, du ralentissement ou de la contradiction sans attendre l’intervention d’une autorité externe. Elle ne relève ni du débat public général ni de la contestation extérieure, mais d’une épreuve organisée en régime endogène : dans le cadre du dispositif lui-même, avec ses propres moyens, ses propres délais et ses propres acteurs. En cela, elle constitue une forme précieuse — et politiquement décisive — de régulation réflexive interne, sans laquelle aucune régulation ne peut durablement maintenir sa cohérence, son adaptabilité ni sa légitimité. - -Mais il faut immédiatement clarifier une chose : l’*archicration interne* n’est pas un ornement démocratique, ni une variable cosmétique destinée à rassurer des observateurs extérieurs. Elle est une exigence structurelle. Elle est ce qui empêche un dispositif de devenir son propre absolu, ce qui rappelle à l’ordre toute opérativité autoréférentielle, ce qui ouvre une scène à la pluralité, au différé, à l’inattendu. Là où l’a*rcalité* fonde, là où la *cratialité* opère, l’*archicration interne* ajuste, interroge, entrave et recompose. - -Pour qu’il y ait *archicration interne* effective, plusieurs conditions doivent être réunies : il faut une scène instituée, des temporalités différées, une pluralité d’acteurs, des procédures documentées, une publication des motifs, et surtout une capacité effective à infléchir la trajectoire décisionnelle. Autrement dit : l’archicration ne se réduit ni à la consultation, ni à la concertation, mais exige la possibilité réelle d’opposer, d’ajourner, de modifier, voire de renverser une orientation prise. C’est une scène dotée de contre-pouvoir, non d’habillage procédural. - -Dans leur configuration la plus accessible, les *archicrations internes* se manifestent à travers des dispositifs fonctionnels de critique ou de remise en cause, souvent portés par des agents internes, des usagers, des médiateurs, des délégués ou des référents professionnels. Ces formes, bien que situées à des niveaux intermédiaires ou périphériques, n’en sont pas moins puissantes, car elles incarnent la capacité d’un système à se réguler depuis ses marges. On les retrouve sous des formes variées : - -- Procédures internes de recours, médiation ou réexamen (comités de discipline avec contradictoire réel, médiateurs d’entreprise dotés d’un pouvoir d’arrêt temporaire, protocoles de signalement). - -- Formes collégiales d’évaluation (commissions mixtes, panels d’usagers, jurys internes indépendants, journées de retour d’expérience). - -- Rituels réflexifs ou symboliques, tels que les audits participatifs, les relectures collectives de chartes, ou les re-signatures de serments professionnels, qui jouent un rôle de réactivation critique. - -- Systèmes épistémiques intégrés (revues de pairs, dispositifs d’auto-formation critique, boucles de feedback opposables). - -Ces dispositifs sont souvent portés par des profils humains modestes mais cruciaux : coordinateurs qualité, médiateurs RH, référents éthiques, syndicats de terrain, agents expérimentés reconnus comme figures d’équilibre. Ce sont eux qui, dans les interstices du pouvoir formel, maintiennent vivante la possibilité de la remise en cause. C’est à travers leur parole, leur écoute, leur capacité à différer l’exécution, que le pouvoir cesse d’être pur flux et retrouve une scène. - -Mais il serait incomplet d’ignorer l’autre polarité de cette scène : celle des figures formelles de pouvoir, des gouvernants internes et des représentants statutaires, c’est-à-dire des personnes ou organes mandatés pour exercer un pouvoir institutionnel à l’intérieur du dispositif, mais aussi, parfois, pour en réguler la trajectoire. Il ne faut pas les réduire à des agents de domination : dans certaines configurations, ils deviennent eux-mêmes des opérateurs d’archicration. - -C’est le cas lorsqu’un conseil municipal pluraliste peut bloquer une décision de l’exécutif local en convoquant les textes fondateurs ; lorsqu’un conseil d’administration doté d’un véritable droit d’amendement associe représentants des usagers, des salariés et des tutelles ; lorsqu’un bureau exécutif est tenu de publier les motifs de ses décisions stratégiques ; lorsqu’une direction institue une cellule indépendante de régulation avec droit de veto ; ou encore lorsqu’une assemblée générale, un congrès syndical ou une conférence de consensus dispose d’une capacité effective à différer, amender ou rouvrir une orientation prise. - -Ce sont là des formes fortement instituées d’archicration interne. Elles sont régulatrices, non parce qu’elles détiennent le pouvoir, mais parce qu’elles détiennent la capacité organisée d’en suspendre, d’en infléchir ou d’en requalifier l’exercice. Là où une telle capacité devient praticable, l’archicration interne cesse d’être périphérique : elle s’encastre dans la verticalité même du pouvoir et peut en redéfinir le cours. - -Ces figures en révèlent aussi immédiatement les limites : lorsqu’elles deviennent cooptées, silencieuses, bureaucratisées, ou empêchées par des délais excessifs, elles cessent d’être des vecteurs d’archicration et deviennent des relais de la seule cratialité. D’où l’importance, dans le diagnostic archicratique, d’évaluer leur pouvoir réel de contestation, leur autonomie, leur capacité d’arbitrage, leur exposition à la critique et leur prise effective sur la décision. - -Une archicration interne n’est jamais réductible à sa forme. Elle doit être interrogée dans la matérialité même de la dispute : publicité des ordres du jour, délais de convocation, accessibilité et motivation des comptes rendus, pluralité des membres, possibilités d’appel, existence de minorités entendues, capacité réelle à ralentir ou infléchir l’exécution. Ces critères ne sont pas accessoires ; ils déterminent la vitalité politique du dispositif. Une scène d’épreuve sans effet ralentisseur, sans temporalité suffisante ou sans prise sur la trajectoire décisionnelle n’est plus qu’un paravent procédural. - -C’est ici que le paradigme archicratique prend toute sa valeur. Ce n’est ni le simple fait d’avoir un conseil, une commission ou une instance consultative qui garantit la tenue politique d’une régulation, ni même la solennité de ses formes. Ce qui importe, c’est l’intelligence du différé : la capacité du dispositif à retenir un acte, ouvrir une objection, entendre une contradiction et rendre possible une reprise. Là où cette possibilité demeure praticable, l’archicration interne maintient le pouvoir habitable ; là où elle se dissout dans l’inaction, la simulation ou l’impuissance organisée, elle cesse d’être une scène de reprise et devient l’un des signes mêmes de la désarchicration. +Les arcalités internes constituent, au sein du paradigme archicratique, +l'un des socles les plus subtils et les plus décisifs de toute +configuration régulatrice. Elles désignent l'ensemble des +justifications, principes, mythes, normes, récits ou codes qui émanent +du dispositif lui-même, sans recours explicite à une autorité +extérieure, surplombante ou transcendante. Ces fondements endogènes +opèrent comme auto-invocations de légitimation : ils confèrent à l'ordre +institué sa prétention à se suffire, à s'auto-justifier, à +s'auto-garantir. Ils incarnent ce que Cornelius Castoriadis nomme +l'auto-institution de la société, c'est-à-dire la capacité d'un +collectif à poser ses propres significations imaginaires comme +fondatrices, sans autre fondement que l'institution même du sens +(Castoriadis, *L'institution imaginaire de la société*, 1975). + +Mais ces arcalités ne sont pas des abstractions désincarnées. Elles +vivent par des figures humaines situées, au sein d'institutions et de +professions qui en assurent la formulation, la transmission, la +ritualisation ou la mise en récit. Toute arcalité interne suppose ainsi +une communauté de portage : juristes, formateurs, responsables éthiques, +pairs reconnus, anciens, référents professionnels, tous ceux qui font +tenir un fondement en le transmettant, en le réactivant ou en +l'invoquant dans l'usage. + +À ce socle incarné s'ajoutent des formes plus discrètes, souvent non +verbalisées, par lesquelles un collectif stabilise un mode de +coordination implicite : postures partagées, rythmes gestuels, +configurations d'attention communes. Ces régulations ne passent ni par +l'argumentation ni par le commandement, mais par une grammaire +incorporée de la convenance et de la présence. Elles ne remplacent pas +l'arcalité formulée ; elles en constituent souvent le soubassement +pratique. + +Ce niveau basal de l'*arcalité* interne révèle que tout fondement +institué suppose aussi une économie de la présence, une grammaire +implicite de la coprésence ajustée. + +Ainsi, ce que cette section vise à démontrer, c'est que dans tout +système régulateur, il existe des formes instituées de légitimation qui +proviennent de l'intérieur, portées par des acteurs situés, incarnées +dans des objets ou des rituels, et investies comme sources de validité. +Cette légitimation endogène peut s'inscrire dans une diversité de +supports matériels ou immatériels : une charte d'éthique co-rédigée en +assemblée interne, un serment professionnel prononcé lors d'un rite +d'entrée dans la profession, une devise affichée dans les locaux, une +archive fondatrice mobilisée lors des formations, ou encore une mémoire +orale transmise entre anciens et nouveaux membres d'un collectif de +métier. + +Le critère déterminant est double. D'une part, ces *arcalité*s doivent +procéder du dispositif lui-même — être issues de son histoire, de son +organisation, de ses acteurs, et non être imposées par une norme externe +ou importée. D'autre part, elles doivent opérer comme principe de +justification réel : donner sens, orienter l'action, encadrer l'usage du +pouvoir ou limiter l'exercice de la force régulatrice. + +Prenons l'exemple paradigmatique du serment professionnel. Le serment +d'Hippocrate, dans sa version contemporaine prononcée à l'entrée de la +profession médicale, fonctionne comme une *arcalité* *interne* typique : +il est porté par la profession elle-même, transmis par les pairs, +encadré par des corps intermédiaires comme les ordres ou les facultés, +et considéré comme source de légitimité pour la pratique médicale. De +même, une charte de l'enseignant-chercheur élaborée collectivement et +approuvée par une instance collégiale, produit une *arcalité* endogène : +elle incarne une norme professionnelle non imposée, mais assumée comme +auto-régulation éthique. + +Mais il serait erroné de réduire ces *arcalité*s *internes* à des +énoncés symboliques ou des proclamations solennelles. Elles prennent des +formes multiples, parfois discrètes, parfois ritualisées, toujours +incarnées. Un règlement intérieur signé collectivement, une cérémonie +d'accueil des nouveaux membres, une archive fondatrice revisitée à +chaque crise, un rite de passage professionnel (comme la soutenance de +thèse ou la titularisation), une parole d'ancien transmise à un jeune +collègue : tous ces éléments participent de la fabrication arcale — à +condition d'être reconnus comme tels par ceux qui les produisent, les +transmettent et les vivent. + +Ces formes différenciées d'*arcalité interne* peuvent être typologisées +selon leurs vecteurs d'incarnation, sans prétendre à l'exhaustivité : + +- *Juridico-normative* : normes internes, statuts fondateurs, corpus + doctrinaux élaborés par les agents du dispositif. Ce sont les + directions juridiques internes, les commissions de rédaction, les + cellules de régulation qui les élaborent, avec l'appui de + professionnels de terrain. + +- *Symbolico-rituelle* : gestes d'institution, prestations de serment, + cérémonies internes. Ces rituels impliquent des figures humaines + précises : maîtres de cérémonie, autorités symboliques, garants de la + tradition. + +- *Éthique professionnelle* : codes de déontologie rédigés par des + collèges internes, charte des valeurs débattue en équipe, engagements + co-signés. Ici, ce sont les communautés professionnelles, les + collectifs de métiers, les cercles de pairs qui en assurent la + légitimation. + +- *Historico-organisationnelle* : récits fondateurs conservés dans des + archives, affichés dans les locaux, transmis par les aînés. Ces mythes + d'origine, portés par les doyens, les secrétaires généraux, les + figures charismatiques internes, stabilisent l'identité collective. + +- *Cognitivo-formative* : doctrines internes formalisées par des + départements de formation ou des cercles de transmission. Il s'agit + ici des formateurs internes, des tuteurs, des référents pédagogiques + qui assurent la pérennité doctrinale du dispositif. + +Ce qui se joue, politiquement, dans cette cartographie incarnée, c'est +la capacité d'un collectif à produire ses propres règles de légitimation +et à les faire vivre par ses membres. Mais c'est aussi, et surtout, la +possibilité de questionner ces règles : *sont-elles effectives ou +simulées ? Portées ou abandonnées ? Sont-elles intégrées par les +nouveaux arrivants ? Sont-elles citées en cas de conflit ? Sont-elles +mobilisées dans les processus de révision ou de réforme ?* Car une +*arcalité* n'est pas une substance ; c'est un acte, une scène, un usage. + +Ainsi, un règlement d'ordre intérieur affichant une « charte des valeurs +» n'a de force arcale que si celle-ci est mobilisable dans une procédure +de recours, évoquée lors d'une saisine, citée dans une délibération. +Faute de quoi, elle devient un artefact symbolique décoratif, un +simulacre de fondement. Le facteur humain est ici déterminant : sans +porteur, pas d'opposabilité ; sans réactivation vivante, pas de +légitimation durable. L'analyse archicratique ne peut donc se contenter +de repérer des objets formels : elle doit identifier les porteurs +humains, les scènes de transmission et les modalités de mobilisation. +Elle doit examiner la performativité réelle de l'arcalité interne — sa +capacité à agir dans le conflit, à fonder une norme, à structurer une +mémoire et à encadrer une cratialité. + +Enfin, l'*arcalité interne* est une position topologique, non une +essence. Un même objet peut être *arcalité interne* dans un dispositif — et devenir externe dans un autre contexte. Une charte +professionnelle co-écrite par un collectif peut devenir norme externe +lorsqu'elle est reprise comme standard par une instance ministérielle. +D'où la nécessité d'une vigilance constante : l'interne se construit +dans l'usage, dans l'incarnation, dans la revendication d'autonomie, et +non dans la seule proximité géographique ou structurelle. + +Cette plasticité, cette mouvance, cette dépendance à des figures +concrètes de légitimation, exigent un instrument d'analyse rigoureux. +Nous en établirons les premiers jalons dynamiques dans la section 1.4.7 +(sur les migrations topologiques), mais il faut d'ores et déjà affirmer +ceci : sans portage humain, il n'y a pas d'*arcalité interne* ; sans +transmission incarnée, il n'y a que texte mort ; sans usage opposable, +il n'y a que vitrine. + +L'*arcalité interne* est ce par quoi un dispositif affirme sa capacité à +se fonder par lui-même — dans ses signes, dans sa mémoire, dans ses +figures professionnelles, dans ses pratiques rituelles. Mais elle n'est +fondatrice que si elle est vécue, disputée et habitée. + +### 1.4.2 — *Arcalités externes* : fondements surplombants, légitimités exogènes et figures d'adossement + +Là où les arcalités internes émanent du cœur du dispositif et sont +portées par ses membres, ses rites et ses récits, les arcalités externes +procèdent d'une autre logique : elles s'imposent, s'importent ou se +projettent depuis un ailleurs normatif. Ce sont des principes, normes, +récits, doctrines, symboles ou références qui ne trouvent pas leur +source dans le champ régulé lui-même, mais à l'extérieur de celui-ci — que cet extérieur soit juridique, scientifique, religieux, moral, +civilisationnel, économique ou épistémique. L'*arcalité externe* est +donc, d'un point de vue topologique, exogène au dispositif +d'application, même si elle peut y être intégrée, traduite ou contestée. + +Historiquement, les arcalités externes ont toujours joué un rôle +structurant dans la formation des ordres politiques. Qu'il s'agisse de +droits impériaux, de référents religieux, de traités internationaux, de +standards scientifiques ou de doctrines économiques globalisées, elles +procèdent d'un ailleurs normatif que le dispositif ne produit pas +lui-même. Mais cet ailleurs n'agit jamais seul : il doit être relayé, +traduit, interprété, parfois contesté, par des acteurs situés. + +Le facteur humain est ici décisif. Diplomates, juristes, experts, +formateurs, médiateurs, responsables institutionnels, professionnels de +terrain : ce sont eux qui assurent la circulation concrète de l'arcalité +externe, et qui conditionnent sa vitalité réelle. Sans ce travail de +portage, de traduction et d'activation, le fondement demeure formel, +décoratif ou inerte ; avec lui, il devient un principe effectivement +régulateur, susceptible aussi d'être discuté dans ses usages et ses +effets. + +Les normes sanitaires internationales offrent un exemple éclairant. La +Déclaration d'Helsinki sur l'éthique médicale ou les recommandations de +l'OMS n'ont d'effet réel qu'à travers leur mobilisation par des médecins +hospitaliers, des directions d'établissements, des juristes de la santé +ou des formateurs en bioéthique. Ce sont ces figures, au croisement de +l'expertise et de l'action, qui assurent l'ancrage — ou, au contraire, +l'exclusion — de l'arcalité dans la pratique. De même, les standards +comptables IFRS ou les normes ISO sont activés, traduits ou contestés +par des acteurs comptables, des auditeurs, des responsables qualité, des +représentants syndicaux, ou encore des agents ministériels chargés de +leur implémentation. + +Les formes différenciées d'*arcalités externes* peuvent dès lors être +cartographiées en fonction de leurs vecteurs d'énonciation et de leurs +agents de portage, que l'analyse archicratique doit repérer avec soin : + +- *Juridico-supranationales* : il s'agit des traités, conventions, + accords, pactes et jurisprudences émanant d'institutions + supranationales (ex. : CEDH, ONU, OMS, OMC). Ces *arcalités* sont + portées localement par des juristes spécialisés, des diplomates, des + délégués nationaux, des magistrats de liaison, et parfois même des ONG + expertes. Elles créent des ponts — ou des dissonances — entre + souverainetés locales et exigences universelles. + +- *Scientifico-techniques* : ces *arcalités* reposent sur des protocoles + internationaux, des grilles de validation scientifique, ou des + classifications globalisées (ex. : DSM, critères IPCC, codes de + bioéthique, référentiels de bonnes pratiques). Elles sont relayées et + stabilisées par des experts sectoriels, des chercheurs reconnus, des + comités d'éthique, ou des agences d'évaluation qui assurent leur + légitimité technique. + +- *Mythico-civilisationnelles* : certaines *arcalités* procèdent de + récits globalement partagés, tels que les droits de l'homme, le + progrès scientifique, la raison universelle ou la démocratie + représentative. Ces références sont souvent portées par des + intellectuels publics, des corps diplomatiques, des enseignants, des + pédagogues ou des figures morales qui les transmettent comme horizon + symbolique. + +- *Épistémiques* : certaines *arcalités* sont véhiculées par des savoirs + naturalisés, tels que le management par objectif, l'innovation + algorithmique ou la résilience institutionnelle. Ces doctrines + circulent via des revues internationales, des *think tanks*, des + consultants experts ou des corps intermédiaires intégrés à la + régulation (ex. : cabinets de conseil accrédités, laboratoires de + gouvernance, réseaux d'experts internationaux). + +- *Théologico-politiques* : enfin, certaines *arcalités* relèvent d'un + ordre religieux ou spirituel transcendant (ex. : droit canon, charia + codifiée, prescriptions rabbinique). Elles sont portées par des + autorités spirituelles, des juristes religieux, des conseillers + confessionnels, ou encore des communautés croyantes qui les + revendiquent comme source supérieure d'organisation sociale. + +Le statut topologique de ces *arcalités externes* est fondamentalement +dynamique. Une norme internationale peut être traduite, adaptée, +appropriée — devenant ainsi partiellement internalisée. À l'inverse, +un texte voté localement peut fonctionner comme *arcalité externe* s'il +est calqué sur des standards importés sans discussion. Le critère de +distinction n'est donc pas juridique, mais positionnel : ce qui compte, +c'est le lieu d'énonciation, le degré de prise, le mode d'activation, la +possibilité de dispute. + +En ce sens, l'analyse archicratique exige une vigilance accrue sur les +conditions de circulation des *arcalités externes*. *Sont-elles +appropriées ou imposées ? Sont-elles traduites ou fétichisées ? Qui les +active ? Avec quelle compétence ? Pour quels effets ?* Le facteur humain +est ici décisif : toute *arcalité externe* passe par un corps social +d'activation, de transposition, d'incarnation — ou échoue à le faire, +et devient alors un fondement mort, déconnecté, décoratif. + +Ainsi, l'inertie d'une *arcalité externe* n'est pas seulement un échec +technique ou politique : c'est le symptôme d'une absence de portage +humain effectif. À l'inverse, sa puissance régulatrice dépend de sa +capacité à être habitée, interprétée, mobilisée, par des professionnels, +des agents publics, des collectifs intermédiaires ou des figures +institutionnelles. Il y a une condition anthropologique de l'*arcalité* +: sans corps vivant, pas de fondement durable. + +Lorsque ces fondements exogènes sont naturalisés, dépolitisés ou rendus +difficilement contestables, ils deviennent des vecteurs privilégiés de +dérives autarchicratiques ou archicratistiques : leur autorité prétendue +neutre masque l'impossibilité pratique de les discuter, de les traduire +ou de les opposer. Ce n'est pas leur contenu qui pose problème, mais +leur mode d'énonciation : lorsque la scène de justification est +neutralisée, lorsque les délais de médiation sont comprimés ou rendus +fictifs, lorsque les dispositifs de traduction deviennent inopérants, +ces arcalités tendent à devenir des injonctions performatives opaques. + +C'est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique impose une exigence +méthodologique claire : documenter le statut, le portage, l'activation +et la contestation des *arcalités externes*. *Qui les invoque ? Qui les +traduit ? Qui les fait vivre ? Sont-elles révisables ? Opposables ? +Intégrées dans une scène ou dissoutes dans le dogme ?* La critique +archicratique ne vise pas à disqualifier l'externe, mais à rendre +visibles ses conditions d'incarnation. + +Une *arcalité externe* bien internalisée, portée par une communauté +compétente, disputée dans ses effets, rendue visible dans ses limites, +peut renforcer un ordre démocratique. Mais une *arcalité* exogène +désincarnée, mimée, figée, peut devenir le vecteur sourd d'un pouvoir à +scène neutralisée, relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou rendue pratiquement +inopérante. Le facteur humain, ici encore, est la clef de l'*arcalité +vivante*. + +### 1.4.3 — *Cratialités internes* : opérativité endogène, chaînes d'exécution incarnées et pouvoir discret sans extériorité + +La *cratialité interne* constitue l'un des points névralgiques du +paradigme archicratique. Elle ne se résume ni à l'action technique, ni à +la simple application de normes venues d'ailleurs. Elle désigne la +capacité d'un dispositif régulateur à produire lui-même, depuis +l'intérieur, sa propre puissance opératoire, sans mobiliser +explicitement une légitimation transcendante, et avec une scène +d'épreuve devenue marginale, reléguée à l'arrière-plan ou pratiquement +inopérante dans le cours ordinaire de l'exécution. En ce sens, l'interne +n'est pas un dedans organique, mais une position topologique de clôture +opératoire : là où la régulation tend à se suffire à elle-même, là où +l'ordre d'exécution s'impose par l'inertie du dispositif, et là où le +pouvoir agit comme s'il n'avait plus à se dire, à se justifier ni à se +laisser reprendre. + +Ce qui distingue fondamentalement la cratialité interne, c'est son +auto-suffisance apparente. Elle repose sur la densité cumulative des +routines, des instruments, des protocoles, des langages, des procédures +et — point décisif — des humains qui les activent, les maintiennent +et les modulent. Car la cratialité interne n'est jamais une abstraction +systémique désincarnée. Elle est portée par des agents, des métiers et +des savoir-faire qui donnent forme, corps et continuité à l'action +régulatrice. Elle est faite de gestes, de réflexes, de scripts mentaux, +de hiérarchies tacites et de cultures professionnelles. En somme, elle +est le produit vivant de celles et ceux qui opèrent. + +Les figures humaines centrales de la *cratialité interne* ne sont pas +nécessairement visibles. Ce ne sont pas les gouvernants, les élus, les +grands décisionnaires. Ce sont les cadres intermédiaires, les agents de +contrôle, les gestionnaires de dossier, les chefs de service, les +responsables de flux, les référents qualité, les techniciens de +*back-office*, les ingénieurs système, les analystes financiers, les +secrétaires d'instruction, les coordonnateurs logistiques, les +rédacteurs de procédures. Ce sont eux qui assurent le maintien +opérationnel des chaînes de décision et d'exécution, sans qu'une +instance politique explicite ait besoin d'intervenir. En cela, ils +incarnent une forme de pouvoir discret, souvent invisible, mais +absolument décisif. + +Historiquement, cette montée en puissance de la *cratialité interne* est +inséparable de la bureaucratisation rationalisée (Weber), du +fonctionnalisme administratif (Crozier), et plus récemment, de la +numérisation intégrale des régulations. Les systèmes informatiques de +gestion, les progiciels de suivi, les tableaux de bord automatisés, les +chaînes logistiques, les plateformes internes de décision, ont +progressivement capturé les lieux où se joue la régulation concrète. +Mais ce ne sont pas ces outils en eux-mêmes qui détiennent le pouvoir : +c'est la manière dont ils sont habités, objets de routines, agencés, par +des professionnels spécialisés — dont les gestes techniques se sont, +peu à peu, substitués à la délibération explicite. + +Il est alors possible de distinguer, à titre opératoire, plusieurs +formes de cratialité interne, selon les vecteurs d'action qu'elles +mobilisent et les compétences humaines qu'elles requièrent : + +- **Procédurales** : chaînes d'instruction, logiques hiérarchiques, + processus standards, checklists, référentiels qualité — incarnées + par gestionnaires, cadres, chefs de projet, instructeurs de dossier, + ceux qui assurent la régularité des opérations. + +- **Infrastructurelles** : réseaux techniques, bâtiments, salles de + serveurs, bases de données locales, outils physiques — entretenus + par techniciens, agents de maintenance, ingénieurs système, + logisticiens, qui garantissent la continuité matérielle de la + régulation. + +- **Algorithmico-fonctionnelles** : logiciels propriétaires, plateformes + internes, interfaces de validation, moteurs de workflow — configurés + et opérés par développeurs, analystes métiers, gestionnaires + applicatifs, qui déterminent en pratique les possibilités d'action. + +- **Cognitivo-organisationnelles** : division des tâches, routines + professionnelles, scripts mentaux — savoir-faire incorporés, tours + de main, automatismes partagés, qui rendent l'action fluide sans être + toujours formalisée. + +- **Langagières et discursives** : jargons techniques, syntaxes + normalisées, grilles d'expression — maîtrisés par rédacteurs, + formateurs, communicants, traducteurs techniques, qui donnent forme + intelligible à la régulation. + +Ce qui fait la puissance silencieuse de cette cratialité interne, c'est +qu'elle peut fonctionner comme si elle n'avait plus à répondre +explicitement de ses justifications, et comme si la scène d'épreuve +n'avait plus de prise effective sur son cours ordinaire. Tout semble +déjà cadré, validé, formaté ; la régulation s'effectue dans la +continuité des procédures, des outils et des gestes professionnels qui +la portent. Elle n'est pas absolument sans arcalité ni sans +archicration, mais celles-ci deviennent peu exposables, reléguées à +l'arrière-plan, ou pratiquement inopérantes dans le cours ordinaire de +l'exécution. + +C'est précisément cette fluidité sans extériorité qui devient +politiquement problématique. Il n'y a plus de scène clairement +praticable où s'adresser, plus de temporalité suffisante pour +l'amendement, plus de responsabilité immédiatement localisable. Ce n'est +pas ici l'illégalité qui domine, mais la fermeture autoréférentielle : +le dispositif fonctionne, donc il se dispense de s'expliquer. + +Dans ses formes les plus avancées, cette cratialité interne tend à +absorber le délibératif, le politique et le symbolique dans la logique +même de l'exécution. L'interface remplace la réunion, le geste de +validation remplace la justification, et la décision se trouve +redistribuée dans des circuits scriptés, normés, régulés — par des +humains qui n'en sont pas toujours les auteurs explicites, mais qui en +assurent l'activation quotidienne. + +Ce n'est ni une dictature au sens classique, ni un simple abus de +pouvoir. C'est un excès d'opérativité, une saturation de l'exécution, +une extinction du différé. L'acte est effectué parce que le système est +conçu pour cela, et parce qu'un agent, quelque part, l'a validé, routé +ou exécuté sans avoir à en reprendre explicitement la pertinence. + +Face à cela, l'analyse archicratique doit entrer dans l'épaisseur des +actes, des routines, des formats, des langages, des outils et des +métiers. Car c'est dans ces gestes distribués, dans ces validations +discrètes et dans ces corps professionnels spécialisés que se joue +désormais une large part de la régulation politique contemporaine. La +cratialité interne n'est pas une mécanique abstraite : elle est une +matrice incarnée, à la fois matérielle et humaine, dont la puissance +tient à ce qu'elle fait tenir l'ordre sans apparaître d'emblée comme +pouvoir. + +### 1.4.4 — *Cratialités externes* : dépendances encodées, transferts d'opérativité et chaînes humaines déterritorialisées + +Si la *cratialité interne* décrit l'opérativité immanente, +auto-structurée et incarnée dans les circuits de gestion, les routines +professionnelles et les savoir-faire endogènes d'un dispositif +régulateur, la *cratialité externe* désigne quant à elle une tout autre +configuration : celle d'une puissance d'action déléguée, importée ou +imposée depuis l'extérieur, mais activée en tant que levier effectif de +transformation du réel à l'intérieur même du dispositif. Cette puissance +est d'autant plus efficace qu'elle circule à bas bruit, dans les +interstices du droit, dans les coulisses du pilotage, dans les +interfaces contractuelles, dans les standards techniques. Mais elle est +tout sauf abstraite : elle est portée, codée, rendue opératoire par des +humains bien réels, agents de la régulation déterritorialisée. + +Historiquement, la cratialité externe s'inscrit dans une longue +tradition de délégation, d'externalisation et de transfert +d'opérativité. Mais ce qui en fait aujourd'hui une configuration +politiquement décisive, ce n'est pas seulement son ancienneté : c'est +que des instruments, des normes, des procédures et des architectures +techniques conçus ailleurs viennent désormais structurer, de +l'intérieur, ce qu'un dispositif peut effectivement faire. + +Dans le contexte contemporain, cette extériorisation de l'opérativité +prend des formes multiples : logiciels de gestion conçus par des +entreprises privées, plateformes d'allocation, dispositifs de notation, +référentiels d'audit, protocoles d'évaluation, systèmes automatisés de +reporting. Ces instruments ne sont pas produits par l'institution +elle-même, mais ils s'intègrent à ses chaînes opératoires au point d'en +reconfigurer les capacités effectives d'action, de décision et de +priorisation. + +Cette régulation par instruments exogènes repose en outre sur des +porteurs humains spécifiques, que l'analyse archicratique ne peut pas +laisser dans l'ombre : consultants, intégrateurs de solutions +numériques, responsables d'implémentation, auditeurs, experts en +conformité, juristes contractuels, chefs de projet transversaux, +évaluateurs mandatés. La cratialité externe n'est donc pas un pouvoir +abstrait ; c'est une opérativité déterritorialisée, mais incarnée, qui +agit moins par commandement visible que par paramétrage, intégration, +cadrage et obligation d'exécution. + +On peut distinguer plusieurs formes typologiques de *cratialité +externe*, selon les vecteurs d'opérativité mobilisés, et selon les +figures humaines associées : + +- *Technologique* : logiciels, API, architectures SaaS, serveurs + distants, systèmes de *machine learning*. Ces instruments sont + développés, calibrés, ajustés par des équipes de développeurs, de + chefs de produit, de *data scientists* travaillant à distance du + dispositif régulé, mais impactant directement sa capacité à décider, à + prioriser, à exécuter. + +- *Juridico-contractuelle* : clauses de marché public, obligations de + résultat, indicateurs contractuellement imposés. Ici, le pouvoir + opératoire réside dans les mains des juristes de cabinets spécialisés, + *contract managers*, acheteurs publics, qui conçoivent les termes + d'une régulation par contrat, où l'exécution devient une obligation + pré-formatée. + +- *Normative* : adoption de référentiels techniques, d'indicateurs de + qualité, de standards ISO. Ces normes sont souvent diffusées par des + auditeurs externes, organismes certificateurs, experts métier qui, + sans lien hiérarchique avec le dispositif régulé, déterminent pourtant + les critères de sa conformité et de son efficience. + +- *Financière* : *cratialité* exercée par les financeurs — banques + multilatérales, agences de financement, investisseurs conditionnels. + Ce sont les chargés de mission, les experts en évaluation financière, + les gestionnaires de portefeuille qui fixent les conditionnalités + d'action, souvent en dehors de toute scène publique de justification. + +- *Organisationnelle* : influence d'agences de conseil, de *think + tanks*, de cabinets en stratégie sur l'ingénierie organisationnelle + des institutions publiques. Ici, ce sont les consultants en + transformation, les designers de politiques publiques, les architectes + de "réforme" qui pilotent le réel sans y apparaître comme autorités + visibles. + +Ces acteurs opèrent la plupart du temps sous couvert d'assistance +technique. Leur rôle est d'« aider à mieux faire », d'« optimiser les +ressources », de « moderniser la gestion », de « rationaliser les coûts +». Mais cette rhétorique techniciste masque souvent une reconfiguration +profonde du pouvoir décisionnel, où le cœur de l'opérativité glisse du +politique vers l'ingénierie, du jugement vers la métrique, du débat vers +le tableau de bord. + +Et surtout, cette délégation opère sans retour critique systématique. +Car ces figures humaines ne relèvent ni du suffrage, ni du débat +contradictoire, ni de la responsabilité institutionnelle directe. Elles +sont contractualisées mais inamovibles, mandatées mais inaccessibles, +présentes mais insaisissables dans le champ de la contestation +politique. + +C'est pourquoi tout diagnostic archicratique sérieux doit documenter ces +*cratialités externes* dans leur articulation humaine. Il ne suffit pas +de dire qu'un logiciel est utilisé, qu'un standard est appliqué, qu'un +cabinet a été mandaté. Il faut nommer les opérateurs, cartographier les +chaînes de délégation, remonter les conditions d'élaboration des +paramètres, tracer les circuits de validation, identifier les espaces de +décision véritable. + +La vulnérabilité archicratique se joue alors dans l'impossibilité de +reprendre la main sur ces instruments : quand le personnel interne ne +peut pas modifier un algorithme, contester un référentiel, réécrire une +clause contractuelle, redéfinir une grille d'évaluation, nous ne sommes +plus dans la co-opérativité, mais dans la captation de l'action par +extériorité. Non pas un pouvoir visible et contestable, mais une forme +d'*imperium* discret, camouflé sous les traits de l'aide ou du progrès. + +L'enjeu, alors, n'est pas d'éliminer la *cratialité externe*, mais de la +rendre contestable, traçable, amendable. Car ce qui fait la force — ou +la dérive — d'un système régulateur, ce n'est pas seulement ce qu'il +fait, mais comment il l'a décidé, et avec qui. Le facteur humain, dans +les cratialités externes, est donc la clef oubliée de toute reprise +démocratique du pilotage. Il est le point d'entrée de toute reprise +politique sur les instruments devenus autonomes, et sur les décisions +sans auteur identifié. + +### 1.4.5 — *Archicrations internes* : scènes d'épreuve encastrées, contre-pouvoirs situés et régulations instituées + +L'archicration interne désigne l'ensemble des mécanismes, instances, +fonctions ou scènes qui permettent à un dispositif de s'auto-exposer à +la critique, de s'interroger depuis l'intérieur, et de produire de +l'ajustement, du ralentissement ou de la contradiction sans attendre +l'intervention d'une autorité externe. Elle ne relève ni du débat public +général ni de la contestation extérieure, mais d'une épreuve organisée +en régime endogène : dans le cadre du dispositif lui-même, avec ses +propres moyens, ses propres délais et ses propres acteurs. En cela, elle +constitue une forme précieuse — et politiquement décisive — de +régulation réflexive interne, sans laquelle aucune régulation ne peut +durablement maintenir sa cohérence, son adaptabilité ni sa légitimité. + +Mais il faut immédiatement clarifier une chose : l'*archicration +interne* n'est pas un ornement démocratique, ni une variable cosmétique +destinée à rassurer des observateurs extérieurs. Elle est une exigence +structurelle. Elle est ce qui empêche un dispositif de devenir son +propre absolu, ce qui rappelle à l'ordre toute opérativité +autoréférentielle, ce qui ouvre une scène à la pluralité, au différé, à +l'inattendu. Là où l'a*rcalité* fonde, là où la *cratialité* opère, +l'*archicration interne* ajuste, interroge, entrave et recompose. + +Pour qu'il y ait *archicration interne* effective, plusieurs conditions +doivent être réunies : il faut une scène instituée, des temporalités +différées, une pluralité d'acteurs, des procédures documentées, une +publication des motifs, et surtout une capacité effective à infléchir la +trajectoire décisionnelle. Autrement dit : l'archicration ne se réduit +ni à la consultation, ni à la concertation, mais exige la possibilité +réelle d'opposer, d'ajourner, de modifier, voire de renverser une +orientation prise. C'est une scène dotée de contre-pouvoir, non +d'habillage procédural. + +Dans leur configuration la plus accessible, les *archicrations internes* +se manifestent à travers des dispositifs fonctionnels de critique ou de +remise en cause, souvent portés par des agents internes, des usagers, +des médiateurs, des délégués ou des référents professionnels. Ces +formes, bien que situées à des niveaux intermédiaires ou périphériques, +n'en sont pas moins puissantes, car elles incarnent la capacité d'un +système à se réguler depuis ses marges. On les retrouve sous des formes +variées : + +- Procédures internes de recours, médiation ou réexamen (comités de + discipline avec contradictoire réel, médiateurs d'entreprise dotés + d'un pouvoir d'arrêt temporaire, protocoles de signalement). + +- Formes collégiales d'évaluation (commissions mixtes, panels d'usagers, + jurys internes indépendants, journées de retour d'expérience). + +- Rituels réflexifs ou symboliques, tels que les audits participatifs, + les relectures collectives de chartes, ou les re-signatures de + serments professionnels, qui jouent un rôle de réactivation critique. + +- Systèmes épistémiques intégrés (revues de pairs, dispositifs + d'auto-formation critique, boucles de feedback opposables). + +Ces dispositifs sont souvent portés par des profils humains modestes +mais cruciaux : coordinateurs qualité, médiateurs RH, référents +éthiques, syndicats de terrain, agents expérimentés reconnus comme +figures d'équilibre. Ce sont eux qui, dans les interstices du pouvoir +formel, maintiennent vivante la possibilité de la remise en cause. C'est +à travers leur parole, leur écoute, leur capacité à différer +l'exécution, que le pouvoir cesse d'être pur flux et retrouve une scène. + +Mais il serait incomplet d'ignorer l'autre polarité de cette scène : +celle des figures formelles de pouvoir, des gouvernants internes et des +représentants statutaires, c'est-à-dire des personnes ou organes +mandatés pour exercer un pouvoir institutionnel à l'intérieur du +dispositif, mais aussi, parfois, pour en réguler la trajectoire. Il ne +faut pas les réduire à des agents de domination : dans certaines +configurations, ils deviennent eux-mêmes des opérateurs d'archicration. + +C'est le cas lorsqu'un conseil municipal pluraliste peut bloquer une +décision de l'exécutif local en convoquant les textes fondateurs ; +lorsqu'un conseil d'administration doté d'un véritable droit +d'amendement associe représentants des usagers, des salariés et des +tutelles ; lorsqu'un bureau exécutif est tenu de publier les motifs de +ses décisions stratégiques ; lorsqu'une direction institue une cellule +indépendante de régulation avec droit de veto ; ou encore lorsqu'une +assemblée générale, un congrès syndical ou une conférence de consensus +dispose d'une capacité effective à différer, amender ou rouvrir une +orientation prise. + +Ce sont là des formes fortement instituées d'archicration interne. Elles +sont régulatrices, non parce qu'elles détiennent le pouvoir, mais parce +qu'elles détiennent la capacité organisée d'en suspendre, d'en infléchir +ou d'en requalifier l'exercice. Là où une telle capacité devient +praticable, l'archicration interne cesse d'être périphérique : elle +s'encastre dans la verticalité même du pouvoir et peut en redéfinir le +cours. + +Ces figures en révèlent aussi immédiatement les limites : lorsqu'elles +deviennent cooptées, silencieuses, bureaucratisées, ou empêchées par des +délais excessifs, elles cessent d'être des vecteurs d'archicration et +deviennent des relais de la seule cratialité. D'où l'importance, dans le +diagnostic archicratique, d'évaluer leur pouvoir réel de contestation, +leur autonomie, leur capacité d'arbitrage, leur exposition à la critique +et leur prise effective sur la décision. + +Une archicration interne n'est jamais réductible à sa forme. Elle doit +être interrogée dans la matérialité même de la dispute : publicité des +ordres du jour, délais de convocation, accessibilité et motivation des +comptes rendus, pluralité des membres, possibilités d'appel, existence +de minorités entendues, capacité réelle à ralentir ou infléchir +l'exécution. Ces critères ne sont pas accessoires ; ils déterminent la +vitalité politique du dispositif. Une scène d'épreuve sans effet +ralentisseur, sans temporalité suffisante ou sans prise sur la +trajectoire décisionnelle n'est plus qu'un paravent procédural. + +C'est ici que le paradigme archicratique prend toute sa valeur. Ce n'est +ni le simple fait d'avoir un conseil, une commission ou une instance +consultative qui garantit la tenue politique d'une régulation, ni même +la solennité de ses formes. Ce qui importe, c'est l'intelligence du +différé : la capacité du dispositif à retenir un acte, ouvrir une +objection, entendre une contradiction et rendre possible une reprise. Là +où cette possibilité demeure praticable, l'archicration interne +maintient le pouvoir habitable ; là où elle se dissout dans l'inaction, +la simulation ou l'impuissance organisée, elle cesse d'être une scène de +reprise et devient l'un des signes mêmes de la désarchicration. ### 1.4.6 — *Archicrations externes* : scènes surplombantes, interpellations dissidentes et figures de contre-institution -Lorsque l’*archicration interne* fait défaut — par capture, désactivation, simulation ou clôture — il ne reste souvent, pour éviter l’absolutisme fonctionnel, que la possibilité d’une épreuve externe. L’*archicration externe*, dans ce contexte, désigne l’ensemble des dispositifs, des acteurs, des scènes, des temporalités et des langages par lesquels une régulation peut être contestée depuis l’extérieur du système qui la produit. Ce sont les formes instituées ou insurgées de dispute venue d’ailleurs, portées par des tiers, des contre-pouvoirs, des entités juridictionnelles, médiatiques, sociales, scientifiques, syndicales, militantes ou citoyennes. Elles incarnent, dans l’architecture du paradigme archicratique, la garantie minimale d’un dehors politiquement actif. +Lorsque l'*archicration interne* fait défaut — par capture, +désactivation, simulation ou clôture — il ne reste souvent, pour +éviter l'absolutisme fonctionnel, que la possibilité d'une épreuve +externe. L'*archicration externe*, dans ce contexte, désigne l'ensemble +des dispositifs, des acteurs, des scènes, des temporalités et des +langages par lesquels une régulation peut être contestée depuis +l'extérieur du système qui la produit. Ce sont les formes instituées ou +insurgées de dispute venue d'ailleurs, portées par des tiers, des +contre-pouvoirs, des entités juridictionnelles, médiatiques, sociales, +scientifiques, syndicales, militantes ou citoyennes. Elles incarnent, +dans l'architecture du paradigme archicratique, la garantie minimale +d'un dehors politiquement actif. -Loin d’être un simple complément du dedans, l’*archicration externe* est une structure autonome d’interpellation politique. Elle permet à des individus ou des collectifs non impliqués dans la conception directe de la régulation — mais affectés par ses effets — de poser une objection, d’ouvrir un contre-récit, de formuler une plainte, d’engager un recours, d’exiger une justification, ou de produire une enquête. Elle est l’une des conditions *sine qua non* de la soutenabilité politique d’un ordre régulateur. +Loin d'être un simple complément du dedans, l'*archicration externe* est +une structure autonome d'interpellation politique. Elle permet à des +individus ou des collectifs non impliqués dans la conception directe de +la régulation — mais affectés par ses effets — de poser une +objection, d'ouvrir un contre-récit, de formuler une plainte, d'engager +un recours, d'exiger une justification, ou de produire une enquête. Elle +est l'une des conditions *sine qua non* de la soutenabilité politique +d'un ordre régulateur. -Il est essentiel d’affirmer ici que l’archicration externe ne s’incarne jamais seule dans des procédures abstraites. Elle repose sur des sujets politiques et des collectifs institués qui en assurent la vitalité concrète : magistrats, syndicalistes, journalistes d’investigation, rapporteurs d’instances supranationales, chercheurs indépendants, lanceurs d’alerte, collectifs citoyens ou requérants engagés dans des contentieux stratégiques. Ce qui les définit n’est pas une simple extériorité géographique ou institutionnelle, mais une position d’exogénéité critique : ils ne produisent pas la régulation, mais ils peuvent en suspendre, en infléchir ou en requalifier les effets. +Il est essentiel d'affirmer ici que l'archicration externe ne s'incarne +jamais seule dans des procédures abstraites. Elle repose sur des sujets +politiques et des collectifs institués qui en assurent la vitalité +concrète : magistrats, syndicalistes, journalistes d'investigation, +rapporteurs d'instances supranationales, chercheurs indépendants, +lanceurs d'alerte, collectifs citoyens ou requérants engagés dans des +contentieux stratégiques. Ce qui les définit n'est pas une simple +extériorité géographique ou institutionnelle, mais une position +d'exogénéité critique : ils ne produisent pas la régulation, mais ils +peuvent en suspendre, en infléchir ou en requalifier les effets. -Dans chacun de ces cas, l’enjeu n’est pas nécessairement d’annuler une décision, mais de la soumettre à l’épreuve d’un regard autre, d’un langage autre, d’un délai autre, d’un jugement autre. L’archicration externe redonne ainsi au politique ce que la cratialité tend à rendre exclusivement fonctionnel : la possibilité d’une objection située, documentée, portée et rendue audible au-dehors du circuit qui a produit la décision. +Dans chacun de ces cas, l'enjeu n'est pas nécessairement d'annuler une +décision, mais de la soumettre à l'épreuve d'un regard autre, d'un +langage autre, d'un délai autre, d'un jugement autre. L'archicration +externe redonne ainsi au politique ce que la cratialité tend à rendre +exclusivement fonctionnel : la possibilité d'une objection située, +documentée, portée et rendue audible au-dehors du circuit qui a produit +la décision. -Pour permettre une cartographie plus fine, il faut distinguer plusieurs vecteurs d’archicration externe, selon la manière dont la contestation s’institue, se porte et agit sur la régulation : +Pour permettre une cartographie plus fine, il faut distinguer plusieurs +vecteurs d'archicration externe, selon la manière dont la contestation +s'institue, se porte et agit sur la régulation : -- Juridictionnelle : lorsque l’épreuve passe par une instance judiciaire ou quasi-judiciaire — nationale ou supranationale — capable de suspendre, de réviser ou d’annuler un effet normatif. +- Juridictionnelle : lorsque l'épreuve passe par une instance judiciaire + ou quasi-judiciaire — nationale ou supranationale — capable de + suspendre, de réviser ou d'annuler un effet normatif. -- Médiatico-documentaire : lorsque la mise au jour publique d’une opacité, d’une contradiction ou d’une dissimulation oblige le dispositif à se justifier, à se corriger ou à se réexposer. +- Médiatico-documentaire : lorsque la mise au jour publique d'une + opacité, d'une contradiction ou d'une dissimulation oblige le + dispositif à se justifier, à se corriger ou à se réexposer. -- Sociale et syndicale : lorsque la contestation s’organise à partir de collectifs capables de formuler une objection durable, de l’instituer et d’en soutenir politiquement le coût. +- Sociale et syndicale : lorsque la contestation s'organise à partir de + collectifs capables de formuler une objection durable, de l'instituer + et d'en soutenir politiquement le coût. -- Scientifique et épistémique : lorsque des contre-expertises, des données contradictoires ou des enquêtes indépendantes rouvrent une décision que le dispositif prétendait clore par l’autorité du savoir. +- Scientifique et épistémique : lorsque des contre-expertises, des + données contradictoires ou des enquêtes indépendantes rouvrent une + décision que le dispositif prétendait clore par l'autorité du savoir. -- Civique et contentieuse : lorsque des citoyens, associations ou collectifs engagent des recours, des pétitions opposables, des actions coordonnées ou des occupations symboliques ouvrant un dehors effectif à la régulation. +- Civique et contentieuse : lorsque des citoyens, associations ou + collectifs engagent des recours, des pétitions opposables, des actions + coordonnées ou des occupations symboliques ouvrant un dehors effectif + à la régulation. -Ces vecteurs ne produisent pas tous les mêmes effets, ni le même degré de contrainte. Mais ils ont en commun d’introduire un dehors capable de troubler l’évidence fonctionnelle de la décision, d’en rouvrir la justification, et de rendre à la régulation une part de la dispute qu’elle tendait à exclure. +Ces vecteurs ne produisent pas tous les mêmes effets, ni le même degré +de contrainte. Mais ils ont en commun d'introduire un dehors capable de +troubler l'évidence fonctionnelle de la décision, d'en rouvrir la +justification, et de rendre à la régulation une part de la dispute +qu'elle tendait à exclure. -Dans chacun de ces cas, l’objet n’est pas nécessairement d’annuler une décision, mais de la soumettre à l’épreuve d’un regard autre, d’un langage autre, d’un délai autre, d’un jugement autre. L’*archicration externe* redonne au politique ce que la *cratialité* a tenté de rendre exclusivement fonctionnel. +Dans chacun de ces cas, l'objet n'est pas nécessairement d'annuler une +décision, mais de la soumettre à l'épreuve d'un regard autre, d'un +langage autre, d'un délai autre, d'un jugement autre. L'*archicration +externe* redonne au politique ce que la *cratialité* a tenté de rendre +exclusivement fonctionnel. -Mais l’existence d’*archicration externe* n’est jamais garantie, même dans des régimes démocratiques formels. Elle dépend : +Mais l'existence d'*archicration externe* n'est jamais garantie, même +dans des régimes démocratiques formels. Elle dépend : -- De la *possibilité d’accès* (ex : peut-on réellement saisir la Cour ? Est-ce financièrement soutenable ?). +- De la *possibilité d'accès* (ex : peut-on réellement saisir la Cour ? + Est-ce financièrement soutenable ?). -- De la *reconnaissance de la contestation* (ex : les minorités sociales ont-elles un droit à la parole égale ?). +- De la *reconnaissance de la contestation* (ex : les minorités sociales + ont-elles un droit à la parole égale ?). -- Du *délai* et du *différé* (ex : la décision est-elle encore réversible ?). +- Du *délai* et du *différé* (ex : la décision est-elle encore + réversible ?). -- De la *publicité des motifs* (ex : la critique peut-elle être entendue, documentée, archivée ?). +- De la *publicité des motifs* (ex : la critique peut-elle être + entendue, documentée, archivée ?). -- De l’*incarnation* (ex : y a-t-il une figure capable de porter la contestation, de l’instituer, de l’assumer dans la durée ?). +- De l'*incarnation* (ex : y a-t-il une figure capable de porter la + contestation, de l'instituer, de l'assumer dans la durée ?). -Lorsque ces conditions s’effacent — ou sont instrumentalisées — l’*archicration externe* se vide de son pouvoir régulateur, devenant scène de théâtre sans effet juridique, procédure sans autorité, recours sans destinataire, voix sans écho. Ce sont ces situations que le paradigme archicratique nous permet de diagnostiquer comme formes de capture par mimétisme externe : la dispute semble possible, mais elle n’a pas de prise. +Lorsque ces conditions s'effacent — ou sont instrumentalisées — l'*archicration externe* se vide de son pouvoir régulateur, devenant +scène de théâtre sans effet juridique, procédure sans autorité, recours +sans destinataire, voix sans écho. Ce sont ces situations que le +paradigme archicratique nous permet de diagnostiquer comme formes de +capture par mimétisme externe : la dispute semble possible, mais elle +n'a pas de prise. -Dans ces cas-là, l’*archicration externe* fonctionne comme décor rituel : rapport public classé sans suite, consultation formelle sans débat réel, médiateur sans mandat coercitif, tribune ouverte sans suite politique. La figure du contre-pouvoir est présente, mais désactivée. On fait parler l’opposition pour mieux l’absorber. +Dans ces cas-là, l'*archicration externe* fonctionne comme décor rituel +: rapport public classé sans suite, consultation formelle sans débat +réel, médiateur sans mandat coercitif, tribune ouverte sans suite +politique. La figure du contre-pouvoir est présente, mais désactivée. On +fait parler l'opposition pour mieux l'absorber. -C’est pourquoi, dans l’économie générale du paradigme, l’*archicration externe* ne doit jamais être pensée comme un supplément facultatif, mais comme une condition limite de viabilité de la régulation. Elle désigne le point où le politique peut encore reprendre forme, quand l’interne a été saturé, quand l’*arcalité* est désactivée, et quand la *cratialité* devient insulaire. C’est le retour du dehors, non comme menace, mais comme ressource de relance critique. +C'est pourquoi, dans l'économie générale du paradigme, l'*archicration +externe* ne doit jamais être pensée comme un supplément facultatif, mais +comme une condition limite de viabilité de la régulation. Elle désigne +le point où le politique peut encore reprendre forme, quand l'interne a +été saturé, quand l'*arcalité* est désactivée, et quand la *cratialité* +devient insulaire. C'est le retour du dehors, non comme menace, mais +comme ressource de relance critique. -C’est aussi, plus tragiquement, le lieu où se manifeste l’effondrement des formes démocratiques classiques, lorsque les canaux de contestation sont obstrués, lorsque les figures de médiation sont vidées de leur pouvoir, lorsque les institutions internationales sont tournées en simples arènes discursives sans effet de reconfiguration. L’*archicration externe* est alors la dernière ligne de fuite — ou la première matrice d’un recommencement politique. +C'est aussi, plus tragiquement, le lieu où se manifeste l'effondrement +des formes démocratiques classiques, lorsque les canaux de contestation +sont obstrués, lorsque les figures de médiation sont vidées de leur +pouvoir, lorsque les institutions internationales sont tournées en +simples arènes discursives sans effet de reconfiguration. +L'*archicration externe* est alors la dernière ligne de fuite — ou la +première matrice d'un recommencement politique. ### 1.4.7 — Interactions croisées et migrations topologiques : dynamiques de déplacement des pôles de la régulation -Si l’on a distingué, jusqu’ici, les prises internes et externes pour chacun des trois pôles du paradigme archicratique — arcalité, cratialité, archicration —, cette cartographie ne saurait être figée. Les dispositifs régulateurs réels ne sont pas des blocs isolés, mais des ensembles dynamiques, traversés par des circulations, des transferts et des reconfigurations. L’interne et l’externe doivent donc être compris comme des positions politiques et stratégiques, dont les objets, les fonctions, les signes et les effets peuvent migrer, se dissimuler ou se renverser. +Si l'on a distingué, jusqu'ici, les prises internes et externes pour +chacun des trois pôles du paradigme archicratique — arcalité, +cratialité, archicration —, cette cartographie ne saurait être figée. +Les dispositifs régulateurs réels ne sont pas des blocs isolés, mais des +ensembles dynamiques, traversés par des circulations, des transferts et +des reconfigurations. L'interne et l'externe doivent donc être compris +comme des positions politiques et stratégiques, dont les objets, les +fonctions, les signes et les effets peuvent migrer, se dissimuler ou se +renverser. -C’est précisément dans cette dynamique migratoire que se déploie toute la plasticité — mais aussi toute l’ambiguïté — des régulations contemporaines. Les dérives autarchicratiques ne se réduisent pas à une simple absence de scène ou à une saturation cratiale ; elles procèdent souvent par reconfiguration des prises : Il arrive très souvent que l’externe devienne interne, par assimilation progressive, et que l’interne soit externalisé, par délégation, transfert ou dessaisissement. Ce qui devrait être visible est rendu opaque par changement de topologie. Ainsi, la dérive autarchicratique se manifeste autant par ce qui est dit que par le lieu d’où cela se dit, autant par ce qui est fait que par le lieu d’où cela s’impose. +C'est précisément dans cette dynamique migratoire que se déploie toute +la plasticité — mais aussi toute l'ambiguïté — des régulations +contemporaines. Les dérives autarchicratiques ne se réduisent pas à une +simple absence de scène ou à une saturation cratiale ; elles procèdent +souvent par reconfiguration des prises : Il arrive très souvent que +l'externe devienne interne, par assimilation progressive, et que +l'interne soit externalisé, par délégation, transfert ou +dessaisissement. Ce qui devrait être visible est rendu opaque par +changement de topologie. Ainsi, la dérive autarchicratique se manifeste +autant par ce qui est dit que par le lieu d'où cela se dit, autant par +ce qui est fait que par le lieu d'où cela s'impose. #### ***Migrations arcales* : du mythe incorporé au fondement importé** -Dans le domaine de l’arcalité, les migrations sont souvent les plus silencieuses, parce qu’elles s’opèrent sur des plans symboliques, juridiques ou cognitifs dont la transformation n’apparaît pas immédiatement comme déplacement politique. Une arcalité externe — norme issue d’un traité, principe importé d’un autre ordre juridique, standard international — peut ainsi être progressivement incorporée comme fondement interne d’un dispositif. Inversement, une arcalité interne peut être projetée au-dehors, universalisée ou standardisée, jusqu’à perdre le caractère situé qui faisait sa force. +Dans le domaine de l'arcalité, les migrations sont souvent les plus +silencieuses, parce qu'elles s'opèrent sur des plans symboliques, +juridiques ou cognitifs dont la transformation n'apparaît pas +immédiatement comme déplacement politique. Une arcalité externe — norme issue d'un traité, principe importé d'un autre ordre juridique, +standard international — peut ainsi être progressivement incorporée +comme fondement interne d'un dispositif. Inversement, une arcalité +interne peut être projetée au-dehors, universalisée ou standardisée, +jusqu'à perdre le caractère situé qui faisait sa force. -Ce jeu de migrations n’est pas anodin. Une arcalité externe internalisée peut cesser d’apparaître comme fondement discutable pour devenir doctrine implicite ; une arcalité interne externalisée peut, à l’inverse, perdre son autorité propre et se dissoudre dans une circulation symbolique plus large. Dans les deux cas, c’est le statut politique du fondement qui se modifie : non son existence, mais sa localisation, sa lisibilité et sa capacité à être repris. +Ce jeu de migrations n'est pas anodin. Une arcalité externe internalisée +peut cesser d'apparaître comme fondement discutable pour devenir +doctrine implicite ; une arcalité interne externalisée peut, à +l'inverse, perdre son autorité propre et se dissoudre dans une +circulation symbolique plus large. Dans les deux cas, c'est le statut +politique du fondement qui se modifie : non son existence, mais sa +localisation, sa lisibilité et sa capacité à être repris. #### ***Migrations cratiales* : entre externalisation opérationnelle et reterritorialisation instrumentale** -La cratialité est sans doute le champ le plus actif de ces transferts topologiques, tant les processus de délégation, de privatisation, d’externalisation ou de sous-traitance y sont massifs. Lorsqu’un dispositif confie à des opérateurs extérieurs la gestion de ses données, de ses outils, de ses référentiels ou de ses interfaces d’exécution, le pouvoir d’opérer circule dans des circuits exogènes, tout en continuant d’affecter directement la régulation interne. +La cratialité est sans doute le champ le plus actif de ces transferts +topologiques, tant les processus de délégation, de privatisation, +d'externalisation ou de sous-traitance y sont massifs. Lorsqu'un +dispositif confie à des opérateurs extérieurs la gestion de ses données, +de ses outils, de ses référentiels ou de ses interfaces d'exécution, le +pouvoir d'opérer circule dans des circuits exogènes, tout en continuant +d'affecter directement la régulation interne. -Mais ce mouvement peut aussi s’inverser. Une cratialité initialement externe peut être réinternalisée lorsqu’un standard, un indicateur ou un outil conçu ailleurs devient un organe de commandement interne. Le problème n’est donc pas seulement l’externalisation : c’est l’opacification de la trajectoire elle-même. Une cratialité externalisée peut échapper au contrôle politique ; une cratialité réinternalisée peut, à l’inverse, rendre invisible sa propre généalogie. Dans les deux cas, la migration brouille l’identification du lieu d’où s’exerce effectivement le pouvoir d’agir. +Mais ce mouvement peut aussi s'inverser. Une cratialité initialement +externe peut être réinternalisée lorsqu'un standard, un indicateur ou un +outil conçu ailleurs devient un organe de commandement interne. Le +problème n'est donc pas seulement l'externalisation : c'est +l'opacification de la trajectoire elle-même. Une cratialité externalisée +peut échapper au contrôle politique ; une cratialité réinternalisée +peut, à l'inverse, rendre invisible sa propre généalogie. Dans les deux +cas, la migration brouille l'identification du lieu d'où s'exerce +effectivement le pouvoir d'agir. #### ***Migrations archicratives* : captations de la scène et externalisations de la dispute** -Enfin, l’archicration est elle aussi traversée par des déplacements topologiques, et leurs effets sont ici décisifs, puisqu’ils touchent à la localisation même des scènes de dispute. Une archicration externe — juridictionnelle, médiatique, citoyenne — peut être intégrée au cœur d’un dispositif régulateur ; mais cette internalisation demeure ambivalente, car elle peut renforcer l’effectivité de la contestation aussi bien qu’organiser sa neutralisation par cooptation ou mise en scène. +Enfin, l'archicration est elle aussi traversée par des déplacements +topologiques, et leurs effets sont ici décisifs, puisqu'ils touchent à +la localisation même des scènes de dispute. Une archicration externe — juridictionnelle, médiatique, citoyenne — peut être intégrée au cœur +d'un dispositif régulateur ; mais cette internalisation demeure +ambivalente, car elle peut renforcer l'effectivité de la contestation +aussi bien qu'organiser sa neutralisation par cooptation ou mise en +scène. -Inversement, une archicration interne peut être délestée vers l’extérieur lorsque les scènes instituées perdent toute prise réelle et que la dispute ne peut plus passer que par des canaux publics, contentieux, militants ou informels. La migration archicrative peut donc être émancipatrice lorsqu’elle ouvre la scène à des acteurs jusque-là exclus ; mais elle peut aussi être neutralisante lorsqu’elle transforme une procédure vivante en décor procédural. Ce que révèle ici l’analyse archicratique, c’est que l’épreuve d’un dispositif dépend moins de la seule existence d’une scène que du lieu où cette scène devient effectivement praticable. +Inversement, une archicration interne peut être délestée vers +l'extérieur lorsque les scènes instituées perdent toute prise réelle et +que la dispute ne peut plus passer que par des canaux publics, +contentieux, militants ou informels. La migration archicrative peut donc +être émancipatrice lorsqu'elle ouvre la scène à des acteurs jusque-là +exclus ; mais elle peut aussi être neutralisante lorsqu'elle transforme +une procédure vivante en décor procédural. Ce que révèle ici l'analyse +archicratique, c'est que l'épreuve d'un dispositif dépend moins de la +seule existence d'une scène que du lieu où cette scène devient +effectivement praticable. -Une analyse archicratique rigoureuse doit donc interroger la trajectoire de ces déplacements : qu’est-ce qui a migré, depuis quel dehors ou quel dedans, et avec quels effets sur la lisibilité, l’opposabilité et la viabilité du dispositif ? C’est seulement à cette condition que l’analyse évite de figer l’interne et l’externe comme des catégories substantielles, et qu’elle peut les lire comme des positions stratégiques, historiquement mobiles. +Une analyse archicratique rigoureuse doit donc interroger la trajectoire +de ces déplacements : qu'est-ce qui a migré, depuis quel dehors ou quel +dedans, et avec quels effets sur la lisibilité, l'opposabilité et la +viabilité du dispositif ? C'est seulement à cette condition que +l'analyse évite de figer l'interne et l'externe comme des catégories +substantielles, et qu'elle peut les lire comme des positions +stratégiques, historiquement mobiles. -Ce que révèle alors le paradigme archicratique, c’est moins la simple présence de déplacements que la manière dont certains dispositifs tendent à les rendre invisibles : naturalisation des arcalités capturées, dissimulation des délégations cratiales, mise en scène neutralisante des archicrations. L’analyse n’attribue pas un pouvoir d’action à l’archicratie ; elle déploie une grammaire pour identifier les régulations qui neutralisent la coprésence de ses pôles constitutifs à travers des migrations topologiques devenues politiquement peu lisibles. +Ce que révèle alors le paradigme archicratique, c'est moins la simple +présence de déplacements que la manière dont certains dispositifs +tendent à les rendre invisibles : naturalisation des arcalités +capturées, dissimulation des délégations cratiales, mise en scène +neutralisante des archicrations. L'analyse n'attribue pas un pouvoir +d'action à l'archicratie ; elle déploie une grammaire pour identifier +les régulations qui neutralisent la coprésence de ses pôles constitutifs +à travers des migrations topologiques devenues politiquement peu +lisibles. -La section suivante prolongera cette réflexion en abordant les tensions de co-viabilité qui naissent de ces migrations : lorsque trop d’externalisation fait perdre la scène, ou lorsque trop d’internalisation clôt la dispute. Car si tout dispositif est composite, encore faut-il que ses articulations restent lisibles, opposables et soutenables. +La section suivante prolongera cette réflexion en abordant les tensions +de co-viabilité qui naissent de ces migrations : lorsque trop +d'externalisation fait perdre la scène, ou lorsque trop +d'internalisation clôt la dispute. Car si tout dispositif est composite, +encore faut-il que ses articulations restent lisibles, opposables et +soutenables. ### 1.4.8 — Tensions de co-viabilité : entre clôture interne et dilution externe -Dans toute configuration régulatrice, les prises internes et externes ne se limitent pas à des composantes topologiques repérables : elles sont vectrices de tensions constitutives, d’équilibres toujours précaires entre clôtures auto-référentielles et expositions à l’altérité. C’est dans cette dynamique que se joue la co-viabilité d’un dispositif, c’est-à-dire sa capacité à durer, à évoluer, à se rendre intelligible, mais aussi à rester politiquement habitable. Il ne suffit pas qu’un dispositif fonctionne pour être viable ; encore faut-il qu’il tienne sans se refermer sur lui-même ni se dissoudre dans un horizon d’hétéronomie indéfinie. +Dans toute configuration régulatrice, les prises internes et externes ne +se limitent pas à des composantes topologiques repérables : elles sont +vectrices de tensions constitutives, d'équilibres toujours précaires +entre clôtures auto-référentielles et expositions à l'altérité. C'est +dans cette dynamique que se joue la co-viabilité d'un dispositif, +c'est-à-dire sa capacité à durer, à évoluer, à se rendre intelligible, +mais aussi à rester politiquement habitable. Il ne suffit pas qu'un +dispositif fonctionne pour être viable ; encore faut-il qu'il tienne +sans se refermer sur lui-même ni se dissoudre dans un horizon +d'hétéronomie indéfinie. -L’excès d’internalité produit des régulations opaques, fermées, surcodées, où les fondements deviennent tautologiques, les procédures autoréférentielles, et les voies de contestation soit illisibles, soit inaccessibles. Dans une telle configuration, l’arcalité interne tourne au dogme, la cratialité interne au pilotage automatique, et l’archicration interne au simulacre procédural. +L'excès d'internalité produit des régulations opaques, fermées, +surcodées, où les fondements deviennent tautologiques, les procédures +autoréférentielles, et les voies de contestation soit illisibles, soit +inaccessibles. Dans une telle configuration, l'arcalité interne tourne +au dogme, la cratialité interne au pilotage automatique, et +l'archicration interne au simulacre procédural. -L’exemple paradigmatique en est un dispositif saturé de ses propres protocoles, de ses tableaux de bord et de ses codages, au point que chaque décision renvoie à une chaîne normative interne qui finit par évacuer tout horizon externe d’évaluation ou de révision. La régulation devient alors circulaire : elle tient, mais ne se reprend plus ; elle fonctionne, mais ne se pense plus. +L'exemple paradigmatique en est un dispositif saturé de ses propres +protocoles, de ses tableaux de bord et de ses codages, au point que +chaque décision renvoie à une chaîne normative interne qui finit par +évacuer tout horizon externe d'évaluation ou de révision. La régulation +devient alors circulaire : elle tient, mais ne se reprend plus ; elle +fonctionne, mais ne se pense plus. -À l’inverse, l’excès d’externalité engendre des régulations dépendantes, instables ou asservies à des logiques qui leur demeurent étrangères. L’arcalité y est déracinée, la cratialité subordonnée à des instruments ou à des opérateurs extérieurs, et l’archicration disjointe de l’espace réel d’action. Le dispositif continue d’agir, mais il n’est plus véritablement ni enraciné ni amendable. +À l'inverse, l'excès d'externalité engendre des régulations dépendantes, +instables ou asservies à des logiques qui leur demeurent étrangères. +L'arcalité y est déracinée, la cratialité subordonnée à des instruments +ou à des opérateurs extérieurs, et l'archicration disjointe de l'espace +réel d'action. Le dispositif continue d'agir, mais il n'est plus +véritablement ni enraciné ni amendable. -Lorsque les références, les outils et les scènes d’épreuve sont tous déplacés hors du périmètre de la régulation elle-même, l’ordre se défait dans l’hétéronomie. L’archicration externe devient lointaine, diluée, parfois cosmétique ; la reprise demeure théoriquement possible, mais pratiquement sans prise sur le cours effectif de l’action. +Lorsque les références, les outils et les scènes d'épreuve sont tous +déplacés hors du périmètre de la régulation elle-même, l'ordre se défait +dans l'hétéronomie. L'archicration externe devient lointaine, diluée, +parfois cosmétique ; la reprise demeure théoriquement possible, mais +pratiquement sans prise sur le cours effectif de l'action. -C’est précisément entre ces deux pôles extrêmes que se joue la possibilité d’un dispositif politiquement viable : ni totalement clos, ni intégralement hétéronome, mais capable de maintenir une tension régulée entre interne et externe. La co-viabilité ne suppose pas l’équilibre parfait des prises ; elle exige qu’aucune ne se ferme sur elle-même au point de rendre illisibles les autres. +C'est précisément entre ces deux pôles extrêmes que se joue la +possibilité d'un dispositif politiquement viable : ni totalement clos, +ni intégralement hétéronome, mais capable de maintenir une tension +régulée entre interne et externe. La co-viabilité ne suppose pas +l'équilibre parfait des prises ; elle exige qu'aucune ne se ferme sur +elle-même au point de rendre illisibles les autres. -Un dispositif demeure habitable lorsqu’il peut mobiliser des justifications internes sans basculer dans l’auto-légitimation close, accueillir des prises extérieures sans se dissoudre dans la dépendance pure, et maintenir des scènes de reprise qui ne soient ni fictives ni délocalisées hors d’atteinte. Ce n’est donc pas la pureté topologique qui importe, mais la lisibilité des articulations, la praticabilité du différé et la possibilité effective d’une reprise. +Un dispositif demeure habitable lorsqu'il peut mobiliser des +justifications internes sans basculer dans l'auto-légitimation close, +accueillir des prises extérieures sans se dissoudre dans la dépendance +pure, et maintenir des scènes de reprise qui ne soient ni fictives ni +délocalisées hors d'atteinte. Ce n'est donc pas la pureté topologique +qui importe, mais la lisibilité des articulations, la praticabilité du +différé et la possibilité effective d'une reprise. -Le paradigme archicratique n’a pas pour vocation de désigner un juste milieu abstrait entre ces deux extrêmes, mais de fournir les instruments critiques permettant de repérer les points de bascule, les seuils de rupture et les zones où la régulation cesse d’être une scène de confrontation parce que ses prises deviennent illisibles. +Le paradigme archicratique n'a pas pour vocation de désigner un juste +milieu abstrait entre ces deux extrêmes, mais de fournir les instruments +critiques permettant de repérer les points de bascule, les seuils de +rupture et les zones où la régulation cesse d'être une scène de +confrontation parce que ses prises deviennent illisibles. -Ces seuils de *co-viabilité* doivent être pensés à partir de critères politiques précis : *existe-t-il un différé ? Un recours ? Une scène ? Une instance d’interpellation ? Une capacité d’amendement ?* Ces questions ne sont pas secondaires : elles sont les conditions minimales de soutenabilité d’un ordre régulateur dans une société qui se dit démocratique. +Ces seuils de *co-viabilité* doivent être pensés à partir de critères +politiques précis : *existe-t-il un différé ? Un recours ? Une scène ? +Une instance d'interpellation ? Une capacité d'amendement ?* Ces +questions ne sont pas secondaires : elles sont les conditions minimales +de soutenabilité d'un ordre régulateur dans une société qui se dit +démocratique. On peut synthétiser ce croisement topologique de manière simple. -Du côté de l’arcalité, l’interne renvoie à des récits fondateurs institutionnels, à des doctrines professionnelles, à des chartes et à des éthiques d’organisation, tandis que l’externe mobilise des référentiels internationaux, des normes trans-étatiques, des mythologies universalistes ou des autorités savantes. +Du côté de l'arcalité, l'interne renvoie à des récits fondateurs +institutionnels, à des doctrines professionnelles, à des chartes et à +des éthiques d'organisation, tandis que l'externe mobilise des +référentiels internationaux, des normes trans-étatiques, des mythologies +universalistes ou des autorités savantes. -Du côté de la cratialité, l’interne se manifeste dans les procédures, les chaînes de commandement, les routines logistiques, les outils métiers et l’architecture bureaucratique ; l’externe, dans les prestataires, les plateformes privées, les standards techniques globaux, les contrats de sous-traitance et les audits imposés. +Du côté de la cratialité, l'interne se manifeste dans les procédures, +les chaînes de commandement, les routines logistiques, les outils +métiers et l'architecture bureaucratique ; l'externe, dans les +prestataires, les plateformes privées, les standards techniques globaux, +les contrats de sous-traitance et les audits imposés. -Enfin, du côté de l’archicration, l’interne prend forme dans les organes de médiation, les commissions ad hoc, les délais internes de recours ou les dispositifs d’audit participatif, tandis que l’externe apparaît dans les juridictions supérieures, la presse d’investigation, les pétitions structurées, les organisations indépendantes et les alertes publiques. Une formalisation synoptique de ces croisements est proposée en annexe, afin d’en faciliter l’usage comparatif. +Enfin, du côté de l'archicration, l'interne prend forme dans les organes +de médiation, les commissions ad hoc, les délais internes de recours ou +les dispositifs d'audit participatif, tandis que l'externe apparaît dans +les juridictions supérieures, la presse d'investigation, les pétitions +structurées, les organisations indépendantes et les alertes publiques. +Une formalisation synoptique de ces croisements est proposée en annexe, +afin d'en faciliter l'usage comparatif. -Prenons un exemple concret. Lorsqu’un algorithme de notation scolaire est conçu, déployé, ajusté, contrôlé, interprété et évalué par la même entité administrative, sans publication de ses paramètres, sans voie de recours externe, sans évaluation indépendante, la régulation est intégralement internalisée. Si, en outre, cet algorithme est développé par un prestataire privé, selon des standards exogènes, sans insertion dans une doctrine pédagogique nationale, alors l’externalisation redevient dominante, mais cette fois sans ancrage arcalitaire interne ni archicration active. Dans les deux cas, la régulation échappe à toute *co-viabilité* politique. Les critiques fusent, mais le diagnostic devient difficile dès lors qu’il s’agit de rendre compte avec précision de ce qui a failli. +Prenons un exemple concret. Lorsqu'un algorithme de notation scolaire +est conçu, déployé, ajusté, contrôlé, interprété et évalué par la même +entité administrative, sans publication de ses paramètres, sans voie de +recours externe, sans évaluation indépendante, la régulation est +intégralement internalisée. Si, en outre, cet algorithme est développé +par un prestataire privé, selon des standards exogènes, sans insertion +dans une doctrine pédagogique nationale, alors l'externalisation +redevient dominante, mais cette fois sans ancrage arcalitaire interne ni +archicration active. Dans les deux cas, la régulation échappe à toute +*co-viabilité* politique. Les critiques fusent, mais le diagnostic +devient difficile dès lors qu'il s'agit de rendre compte avec précision +de ce qui a failli. -C’est dans ces configurations que l’analyse archicratique prend tout son sens : rétablir une cartographie des prises, identifier la topologie des relations, mesurer la transparence des bifurcations, détecter les zones d’autonomisation dangereuse — et, le cas échéant, proposer une réarticulation des circuits de fondation, d’opération et de dispute. +C'est dans ces configurations que l'analyse archicratique prend tout son +sens : rétablir une cartographie des prises, identifier la topologie des +relations, mesurer la transparence des bifurcations, détecter les zones +d'autonomisation dangereuse — et, le cas échéant, proposer une +réarticulation des circuits de fondation, d'opération et de dispute. -En somme, penser la *co-viabilité* d’un dispositif régulateur, c’est penser sa tenue dans le différé, son ouverture à l’extériorité, sa capacité de reconfiguration, sans perdre son ancrage ni dissoudre sa légitimité. Ce n’est ni un équilibre idéal, ni une norme absolue : c’est une exigence politique minimale. Et c’est à cette exigence que répond, dans sa vocation critique, le paradigme archicratique. +En somme, penser la *co-viabilité* d'un dispositif régulateur, c'est +penser sa tenue dans le différé, son ouverture à l'extériorité, sa +capacité de reconfiguration, sans perdre son ancrage ni dissoudre sa +légitimité. Ce n'est ni un équilibre idéal, ni une norme absolue : c'est +une exigence politique minimale. Et c'est à cette exigence que répond, +dans sa vocation critique, le paradigme archicratique. ## **1.5 — Formes dynamiques de la tenue archicratique** -Penser un paradigme relationnel, c’est refuser de traiter les régulations comme des états fixes, des catégories stables ou des oppositions binaires. Le paradigme archicratique ne cherche pas à déterminer si un système est équilibré ou déréglé, mais à analyser comment il tient, par quelles prises, dans quelle configuration de relations entre *arcalité, cratialité et archicration*, et surtout, jusqu’où cette tenue est vivable, soutenable, opposable. La régulation n’est pas un état ; c’est une forme — toujours en tension, toujours en transformation. +Penser un paradigme relationnel, c'est refuser de traiter les +régulations comme des états fixes, des catégories stables ou des +oppositions binaires. Le paradigme archicratique ne cherche pas à +déterminer si un système est équilibré ou déréglé, mais à analyser +comment il tient, par quelles prises, dans quelle configuration de +relations entre *arcalité, cratialité et archicration*, et surtout, +jusqu'où cette tenue est vivable, soutenable, opposable. La régulation +n'est pas un état ; c'est une forme — toujours en tension, toujours en +transformation. -Cette section propose une typologie des formes de tenue archicratique : une modélisation des manières dont les trois pôles du paradigme s’articulent ou se désarticulent dans les dispositifs réels. Car toute régulation effective engage nécessairement ces trois dimensions, mais elle le fait selon des équilibres hétérogènes, des désajustements partiels, des déséquilibres provisoirement tenus, des saturations masquées ou des ajustements régénérants. +Cette section propose une typologie des formes de tenue archicratique : +une modélisation des manières dont les trois pôles du paradigme +s'articulent ou se désarticulent dans les dispositifs réels. Car toute +régulation effective engage nécessairement ces trois dimensions, mais +elle le fait selon des équilibres hétérogènes, des désajustements +partiels, des déséquilibres provisoirement tenus, des saturations +masquées ou des ajustements régénérants. -Nous nommerons ici forme de tenue archicratique toute configuration empirique ou modélisable dans laquelle les trois pôles sont en relation active, selon des degrés de présence, d’articulation, de visibilité et d’effectivité différenciés. Certaines formes permettent la viabilité démocratique du dispositif — nous les qualifierons de *synchrotopiques* : elles maintiennent la tension entre les pôles dans un espace de co-viabilité. D’autres sont marquées par l’hypertrophie d’un pôle, l’effacement d’un autre, ou la déconnexion entre niveaux — elles conduisent à des formes dites hypertopiques, hypotopiques ou atopiques. Enfin, certaines configurations ne relèvent d’aucune pathologie manifeste, mais laissent apparaître des signes cliniques faibles de désarticulation : perte de scène, opacité opérative, ritualisation creuse des fondements. +Nous nommerons ici forme de tenue archicratique toute configuration +empirique ou modélisable dans laquelle les trois pôles sont en relation +active, selon des degrés de présence, d'articulation, de visibilité et +d'effectivité différenciés. Certaines formes permettent la viabilité +démocratique du dispositif — nous les qualifierons de +*synchrotopiques* : elles maintiennent la tension entre les pôles dans +un espace de co-viabilité. D'autres sont marquées par l'hypertrophie +d'un pôle, l'effacement d'un autre, ou la déconnexion entre niveaux — elles conduisent à des formes dites hypertopiques, hypotopiques ou +atopiques. Enfin, certaines configurations ne relèvent d'aucune +pathologie manifeste, mais laissent apparaître des signes cliniques +faibles de désarticulation : perte de scène, opacité opérative, +ritualisation creuse des fondements. -Ces configurations de tenue ne valent ni comme jugement moral, ni comme idéal-type figé. Elles doivent être comprises comme des formes observables et évolutives. Elles ne sont pas des essences, mais des positions dans un espace de viabilité régulatoire. Et leur analyse permet, dans chaque cas empirique, de répondre à la question fondamentale : *qu’est-ce qui tient ici ? Comment ? À quel prix ? Et pour combien de temps ?* +Ces configurations de tenue ne valent ni comme jugement moral, ni comme +idéal-type figé. Elles doivent être comprises comme des formes +observables et évolutives. Elles ne sont pas des essences, mais des +positions dans un espace de viabilité régulatoire. Et leur analyse +permet, dans chaque cas empirique, de répondre à la question +fondamentale : *qu'est-ce qui tient ici ? Comment ? À quel prix ? Et +pour combien de temps ?* -Il ne s’agit donc pas de réhabiliter une typologie figée (équilibré vs déséquilibré), ni de fantasmer un modèle harmonieux. +Il ne s'agit donc pas de réhabiliter une typologie figée (équilibré vs +déséquilibré), ni de fantasmer un modèle harmonieux. -Quatre grandes formes dynamiques de tenue archicratique peuvent alors être distinguées : +Quatre grandes formes dynamiques de tenue archicratique peuvent alors +être distinguées : -- La forme *synchrotopique* : tension vivable, différenciation claire des pôles, articulation régulée — une régulation habitable. +- La forme *synchrotopique* : tension vivable, différenciation claire + des pôles, articulation régulée — une régulation habitable. -- La forme *hypertopique* : domination d’un pôle archicratique, avec effets de blocage, d’asymétrie ou de dévitalisation. +- La forme *hypertopique* : domination d'un pôle archicratique, avec + effets de blocage, d'asymétrie ou de dévitalisation. -- La forme *hypotopique* : effacements, désaffiliations, mises en latence ou désarrimages des prises régulatrices. +- La forme *hypotopique* : effacements, désaffiliations, mises en + latence ou désarrimages des prises régulatrices. -- La forme *atopique* : mimétisme des pôles, vacuité des prises, spectralisation de la régulation. +- La forme *atopique* : mimétisme des pôles, vacuité des prises, + spectralisation de la régulation. -Chacune appelle un examen différencié de ses symptômes, de ses objets d’épreuve et de ses points de bascule. +Chacune appelle un examen différencié de ses symptômes, de ses objets +d'épreuve et de ses points de bascule. -Ces formes ne s’excluent ni absolument ni définitivement : un même dispositif peut en combiner plusieurs, en traverser successivement les régimes, ou présenter simultanément, selon ses secteurs, une tenue synchrotopique, une dérive hypertopique ou une archicration atopique. Leur fonction n’est pas de classer une fois pour toutes, mais de qualifier des régimes de composition. +Ces formes ne s'excluent ni absolument ni définitivement : un même +dispositif peut en combiner plusieurs, en traverser successivement les +régimes, ou présenter simultanément, selon ses secteurs, une tenue +synchrotopique, une dérive hypertopique ou une archicration atopique. +Leur fonction n'est pas de classer une fois pour toutes, mais de +qualifier des régimes de composition. -Ainsi comprise, cette typologie n’est pas un classement, mais un outil critique : elle permet d’évaluer la tenue d’un ordre, non pas au regard d’un idéal abstrait, mais selon sa capacité à maintenir un espace de régulation différenciée, active, opposable et soutenable. +Ainsi comprise, cette typologie n'est pas un classement, mais un outil +critique : elle permet d'évaluer la tenue d'un ordre, non pas au regard +d'un idéal abstrait, mais selon sa capacité à maintenir un espace de +régulation différenciée, active, opposable et soutenable. ### 1.5.1 — *Formes synchrotopiques* : régulation différenciée, soutenable et habitable -Il est un mode rare — mais essentiel — de régulation politique dans lequel les dispositifs archicratiques parviennent à maintenir une différenciation vivante et stable entre leurs composantes, sans tomber ni dans l’autoréférence close, ni dans l’hétéro-dépendance désarticulée, ni dans la neutralisation de la contestation. Ce mode, que nous nommons *forme synchrotopique*, désigne une configuration dans laquelle la régulation s’institue dans une relative cohérence temporelle et topologique : chaque prise, chaque scène, chaque opération s’inscrit dans un espace-temps identifiable, habité, pluralisé — et surtout réellement traversable par les acteurs impliqués. +Il est un mode rare — mais essentiel — de régulation politique dans +lequel les dispositifs archicratiques parviennent à maintenir une +différenciation vivante et stable entre leurs composantes, sans tomber +ni dans l'autoréférence close, ni dans l'hétéro-dépendance désarticulée, +ni dans la neutralisation de la contestation. Ce mode, que nous nommons +*forme synchrotopique*, désigne une configuration dans laquelle la +régulation s'institue dans une relative cohérence temporelle et +topologique : chaque prise, chaque scène, chaque opération s'inscrit +dans un espace-temps identifiable, habité, pluralisé — et surtout +réellement traversable par les acteurs impliqués. -Loin de toute idéalisation d’un équilibre parfait, cette forme n’implique ni harmonie statique, ni absence de tensions. Elle désigne plutôt la capacité d’un complexe archicratique de tenir ensemble ses différents régimes de légitimation, d’action et de mise à l’épreuve sans que l’un d’eux n’absorbe ou n’annule les autres. La synchronisation n’est pas un alignement mécanique ; elle est une mise en cadence intelligible des temps du fondement, de l’action et de la contradiction. De même, la topologie convoquée n’est pas une géographie abstraite, mais une cartographie opératoire des lieux, des organes, des flux, des seuils et des scènes où les dynamiques de régulation prennent corps. +Loin de toute idéalisation d'un équilibre parfait, cette forme +n'implique ni harmonie statique, ni absence de tensions. Elle désigne +plutôt la capacité d'un complexe archicratique de tenir ensemble ses +différents régimes de légitimation, d'action et de mise à l'épreuve sans +que l'un d'eux n'absorbe ou n'annule les autres. La synchronisation +n'est pas un alignement mécanique ; elle est une mise en cadence +intelligible des temps du fondement, de l'action et de la contradiction. +De même, la topologie convoquée n'est pas une géographie abstraite, mais +une cartographie opératoire des lieux, des organes, des flux, des seuils +et des scènes où les dynamiques de régulation prennent corps. -Ce qui caractérise la *forme synchrotopique* est d’abord son épaisseur incarnée : les régulations qui y prennent place sont portées, ajustées, interprétées, critiquées, révisées par des sujets situés, professionnels ou profanes, dirigeants ou subalternes, mais tous dotés de moyens réels d’agir ou de contester. L’autonomie n’est pas ici une fiction, mais une propriété distribuée : les fonctions de pilotage ne sont pas déconnectées des capacités de remise en cause ; les fondements normatifs sont susceptibles d’être rappelés, amendés, interprétés ; les décisions prises peuvent faire l’objet d’un délai, d’un recours, d’un retour. +Ce qui caractérise la *forme synchrotopique* est d'abord son épaisseur +incarnée : les régulations qui y prennent place sont portées, ajustées, +interprétées, critiquées, révisées par des sujets situés, professionnels +ou profanes, dirigeants ou subalternes, mais tous dotés de moyens réels +d'agir ou de contester. L'autonomie n'est pas ici une fiction, mais une +propriété distribuée : les fonctions de pilotage ne sont pas +déconnectées des capacités de remise en cause ; les fondements normatifs +sont susceptibles d'être rappelés, amendés, interprétés ; les décisions +prises peuvent faire l'objet d'un délai, d'un recours, d'un retour. -La configuration *synchrotopique* suppose également une architecture documentaire et procédurale lisible : les textes de référence sont accessibles, les décisions sont motivées, les voies de révision sont connues, les outils techniques sont compréhensibles et discutables. Il existe des scènes, non seulement pour décider, mais pour expliquer, discuter, contester et reformuler. La régulation ne s’impose pas comme un automatisme, mais comme une pratique politique située, où l’ajustement et la réflexivité sont constitutifs de la viabilité. +La configuration *synchrotopique* suppose également une architecture +documentaire et procédurale lisible : les textes de référence sont +accessibles, les décisions sont motivées, les voies de révision sont +connues, les outils techniques sont compréhensibles et discutables. Il +existe des scènes, non seulement pour décider, mais pour expliquer, +discuter, contester et reformuler. La régulation ne s'impose pas comme +un automatisme, mais comme une pratique politique située, où +l'ajustement et la réflexivité sont constitutifs de la viabilité. -Historiquement, des formes *synchrotopiques* ont pu émerger dans certains contextes de co-délibération institutionnelle, de régulation collégiale ou de gouvernance polycentrique : par exemple, dans des agences sanitaires dotées de comités d’éthique indépendants et pluralistes, dont les avis sont publics et pris en compte dans les décisions exécutives ; ou dans certains hôpitaux publics où la régulation des soins inclut des scènes de dialogue entre praticiens, gestionnaires, représentants des usagers et autorités de santé. Ces situations ne sont jamais parfaites, mais elles manifestent une capacité de tenue différenciée, où aucune des prises n’écrase entièrement les autres. +Historiquement, des formes *synchrotopiques* ont pu émerger dans +certains contextes de co-délibération institutionnelle, de régulation +collégiale ou de gouvernance polycentrique : par exemple, dans des +agences sanitaires dotées de comités d'éthique indépendants et +pluralistes, dont les avis sont publics et pris en compte dans les +décisions exécutives ; ou dans certains hôpitaux publics où la +régulation des soins inclut des scènes de dialogue entre praticiens, +gestionnaires, représentants des usagers et autorités de santé. Ces +situations ne sont jamais parfaites, mais elles manifestent une capacité +de tenue différenciée, où aucune des prises n'écrase entièrement les +autres. -Ce régime de régulation — bien qu’exceptionnel dans les faits — n’est pas utopique. Il est au contraire ce vers quoi toute configuration régulatrice devrait pouvoir tendre si elle entend rester soutenable politiquement. Ce qui le rend possible, c’est la *co-existence organisée* de plusieurs formes d’intelligence : *intelligence technique* (pour opérer), *intelligence politique* (pour justifier), *intelligence critique* (pour contester). Et surtout, l’acceptation du fait que la stabilité ne vient pas de la suppression des conflits, mais de leur mise en forme dans des lieux et des temps politiquement institués qui permettent de les canaliser. +Ce régime de régulation — bien qu'exceptionnel dans les faits — n'est pas utopique. Il est au contraire ce vers quoi toute configuration +régulatrice devrait pouvoir tendre si elle entend rester soutenable +politiquement. Ce qui le rend possible, c'est la *co-existence +organisée* de plusieurs formes d'intelligence : *intelligence technique* +(pour opérer), *intelligence politique* (pour justifier), *intelligence +critique* (pour contester). Et surtout, l'acceptation du fait que la +stabilité ne vient pas de la suppression des conflits, mais de leur mise +en forme dans des lieux et des temps politiquement institués qui +permettent de les canaliser. -La *forme synchrotopique* est donc celle d’un dispositif où la régulation reste habitable : non parce qu’elle serait consensuelle, mais parce qu’elle ne nie jamais la possibilité du dissensus, de la reprise, de la reformulation. Elle articule la puissance d’agir et la capacité de réviser. Elle assume que toute décision, aussi technique ou normative soit-elle, doit pouvoir être située, discutée et approuvée. Elle produit non pas la paix, mais le cadre de la coexistence par controverse. En ce sens, elle constitue la forme la plus résistante aux dérives archicratiques : non pas parce qu’elle les empêche par magie, mais parce qu’elle en institue les contre-pouvoirs effectifs. +La *forme synchrotopique* est donc celle d'un dispositif où la +régulation reste habitable : non parce qu'elle serait consensuelle, mais +parce qu'elle ne nie jamais la possibilité du dissensus, de la reprise, +de la reformulation. Elle articule la puissance d'agir et la capacité de +réviser. Elle assume que toute décision, aussi technique ou normative +soit-elle, doit pouvoir être située, discutée et approuvée. Elle produit +non pas la paix, mais le cadre de la coexistence par controverse. En ce +sens, elle constitue la forme la plus résistante aux dérives +archicratiques : non pas parce qu'elle les empêche par magie, mais parce +qu'elle en institue les contre-pouvoirs effectifs. -Elle est enfin celle où l’humain — en tant que professionnel, usager, citoyen, responsable ou garant — n’est jamais dissous dans l’automatisme, ni neutralisé dans le silence, mais pleinement inscrit dans les circuits de la régulation comme acteur pensant, sentant, contestant et responsable. +Elle est enfin celle où l'humain — en tant que professionnel, usager, +citoyen, responsable ou garant — n'est jamais dissous dans +l'automatisme, ni neutralisé dans le silence, mais pleinement inscrit +dans les circuits de la régulation comme acteur pensant, sentant, +contestant et responsable. ### 1.5.2 — *Formes hypertopiques* : déséquilibres par excès, asymétries de pouvoir et régulations verrouillées -Il est des configurations dans lesquelles la régulation archicratique ne se déploie plus selon la tension dynamique de ses trois pôles constitutifs, mais se trouve déséquilibrée, rigidifiée ou verrouillée par la surdétermination de l’un d’eux, ou par l’alliance de deux contre le troisième. Ces régimes — que nous désignons comme hypertopiques — ne se caractérisent pas tant par la disparition de l’un des pôles que par l’hyper-développement d’un autre, ou par la formation d’alliances asymétriques entre deux fonctions régulatrices qui marginalisent la troisième. Dès lors, ce n’est pas tant l’absence d’un élément qui crée la pathologie, mais bien son excès, sa prétention à suffire, ou sa capture des autres fonctions régulatrices. +Il est des configurations dans lesquelles la régulation archicratique ne +se déploie plus selon la tension dynamique de ses trois pôles +constitutifs, mais se trouve déséquilibrée, rigidifiée ou verrouillée +par la surdétermination de l'un d'eux, ou par l'alliance de deux contre +le troisième. Ces régimes — que nous désignons comme hypertopiques — ne se caractérisent pas tant par la disparition de l'un des pôles que +par l'hyper-développement d'un autre, ou par la formation d'alliances +asymétriques entre deux fonctions régulatrices qui marginalisent la +troisième. Dès lors, ce n'est pas tant l'absence d'un élément qui crée +la pathologie, mais bien son excès, sa prétention à suffire, ou sa +capture des autres fonctions régulatrices. -Cette hypertrophie peut prendre diverses formes : autoréférencement dogmatique du fondement, suractivation procédurale des opérateurs, inflation de dispositifs critiques sans emprise effective sur la régulation. Ce sont là les figures d’une archicratie figée dans l’un de ses pôles, au détriment de l’articulation d’ensemble qui seule permet la viabilité d’une régulation soutenable. +Cette hypertrophie peut prendre diverses formes : autoréférencement +dogmatique du fondement, suractivation procédurale des opérateurs, +inflation de dispositifs critiques sans emprise effective sur la +régulation. Ce sont là les figures d'une archicratie figée dans l'un de +ses pôles, au détriment de l'articulation d'ensemble qui seule permet la +viabilité d'une régulation soutenable. #### Premier cas : hypertrophies unipolaires -Dans les *configurations hypertopiques unipolaires*, la dynamique archicratique cesse de tenir ensemble ses trois fonctions et se trouve capturée par l’hyper-développement de l’une d’entre elles. Ainsi, lorsqu’un dispositif se referme sur ses propres fondements – qu’ils soient juridiques, idéologiques, doctrinaux ou historiques – jusqu’à les considérer comme intouchables ou indépassables, la régulation bascule dans une incantation dogmatique. L’ordre n’est plus ajusté : il est répété, récité, invoqué. Les exemples abondent. Dans certains pays, la Constitution est sacralisée au point qu’aucune révision n’est envisageable, même lorsque ses dispositions deviennent incompatibles avec les réalités sociales. Des régimes fondés sur une doctrine religieuse appliquent, sans adaptation ni différé, des prescriptions sacrées à des sociétés profondément transformées. Plus proche de nous, certains codes professionnels — par exemple dans les universités ou les ordres médicaux — sont érigés en principes inamovibles, invoqués à chaque contestation, mais jamais revisités à la lumière de nouvelles pratiques. Dans tous ces cas, la *sur-arcalisation* produit un pouvoir qui énonce sans agir ou qui impose sans adapter, transformant le fondement en carapace immobile. +Dans les *configurations hypertopiques unipolaires*, la dynamique +archicratique cesse de tenir ensemble ses trois fonctions et se trouve +capturée par l'hyper-développement de l'une d'entre elles. Ainsi, +lorsqu'un dispositif se referme sur ses propres fondements — qu'ils +soient juridiques, idéologiques, doctrinaux ou historiques — jusqu'à +les considérer comme intouchables ou indépassables, la régulation +bascule dans une incantation dogmatique. L'ordre n'est plus ajusté : il +est répété, récité, invoqué. Les exemples abondent. Dans certains pays, +la Constitution est sacralisée au point qu'aucune révision n'est +envisageable, même lorsque ses dispositions deviennent incompatibles +avec les réalités sociales. Des régimes fondés sur une doctrine +religieuse appliquent, sans adaptation ni différé, des prescriptions +sacrées à des sociétés profondément transformées. Plus proche de nous, +certains codes professionnels — par exemple dans les universités ou +les ordres médicaux — sont érigés en principes inamovibles, invoqués à +chaque contestation, mais jamais revisités à la lumière de nouvelles +pratiques. Dans tous ces cas, la *sur-arcalisation* produit un pouvoir +qui énonce sans agir ou qui impose sans adapter, transformant le +fondement en carapace immobile. -À l’autre extrême, des dispositifs se replient sur leurs seuls instruments opératoires – logiques de gestion, outils de pilotage, normes de performance, procédures d’implémentation – sans plus se référer à un fondement discuté ni à une scène de contestation organisée. Cette *hypertopie cratiale* est devenue banale. Dans les hôpitaux publics européens, par exemple, des logiciels de planification budgétaire, imposant des seuils d’activité et des ratios financiers, déterminent désormais les ouvertures de lits et l’allocation du personnel sans qu’aucun espace de révision éthique ou politique ne soit prévu. Dans l’administration fiscale, des algorithmes de sélection des contrôles s’appliquent aux contribuables sans publication des critères ni délai d’appel significatif. Ici, l’injonction d’agir prime sur celle de fonder ou de débattre : l’action est auto-légitimée par son rendement, sans plus d’ancrage ni de différé. +À l'autre extrême, des dispositifs se replient sur leurs seuls +instruments opératoires — logiques de gestion, outils de pilotage, +normes de performance, procédures d'implémentation — sans plus se +référer à un fondement discuté ni à une scène de contestation organisée. +Cette *hypertopie cratiale* est devenue banale. Dans les hôpitaux +publics européens, par exemple, des logiciels de planification +budgétaire, imposant des seuils d'activité et des ratios financiers, +déterminent désormais les ouvertures de lits et l'allocation du +personnel sans qu'aucun espace de révision éthique ou politique ne soit +prévu. Dans l'administration fiscale, des algorithmes de sélection des +contrôles s'appliquent aux contribuables sans publication des critères +ni délai d'appel significatif. Ici, l'injonction d'agir prime sur celle +de fonder ou de débattre : l'action est auto-légitimée par son +rendement, sans plus d'ancrage ni de différé. -Enfin, certaines configurations connaissent l’hypertrophie inverse : la scène de la contestation elle-même prend le pas sur toute opérativité ou fondement structurant. Le débat, la critique, la participation, l’écoute deviennent les valeurs cardinales, mais sans prise effective sur les décisions. On multiplie les instances, les consultations, les procédures contradictoires — mais sans transformation ni effet de structure. C’est le cas de nombreuses plateformes de consultation publique, où des milliers de contributions citoyennes sont recueillies, publiées, cartographiées — mais jamais traduites en amendements effectifs dans les lois. Certaines assemblées universitaires, saturées de commissions et de votes consultatifs, produisent un flux continu d’avis minoritaires qui ne parviennent jamais à modifier une trajectoire imposée par ailleurs. Dans ces cas, la régulation devient un théâtre d’*archicration* sans *arcalité* ni *cratialité* mobilisées, une fabrique de simulacres où l’on débat de tout sauf de ce qui décide réellement. +Enfin, certaines configurations connaissent l'hypertrophie inverse : la +scène de la contestation elle-même prend le pas sur toute opérativité ou +fondement structurant. Le débat, la critique, la participation, l'écoute +deviennent les valeurs cardinales, mais sans prise effective sur les +décisions. On multiplie les instances, les consultations, les procédures +contradictoires — mais sans transformation ni effet de structure. +C'est le cas de nombreuses plateformes de consultation publique, où des +milliers de contributions citoyennes sont recueillies, publiées, +cartographiées — mais jamais traduites en amendements effectifs dans +les lois. Certaines assemblées universitaires, saturées de commissions +et de votes consultatifs, produisent un flux continu d'avis minoritaires +qui ne parviennent jamais à modifier une trajectoire imposée par +ailleurs. Dans ces cas, la régulation devient un théâtre +d'*archicration* sans *arcalité* ni *cratialité* mobilisées, une +fabrique de simulacres où l'on débat de tout sauf de ce qui décide +réellement. -Ces trois figures – *sur-arcalisation, sur-cratialisation, sur-archicration* – ne sont pas des exceptions, mais des symptômes récurrents des régimes hypertopiques. Elles montrent que l’hypertrophie d’un pôle ou l’alliance de deux contre le troisième n’est pas une simple pathologie marginale : c’est un mode de verrouillage structurel, observable aussi bien dans les institutions publiques que dans les organisations privées ou les dispositifs transnationaux. +Ces trois figures — *sur-arcalisation, sur-cratialisation, +sur-archicration* — ne sont pas des exceptions, mais des symptômes +récurrents des régimes hypertopiques. Elles montrent que l'hypertrophie +d'un pôle ou l'alliance de deux contre le troisième n'est pas une simple +pathologie marginale : c'est un mode de verrouillage structurel, +observable aussi bien dans les institutions publiques que dans les +organisations privées ou les dispositifs transnationaux. -#### Configurations d’asymétries : compacités fonctionnelles, désactivation du tiers et fragilisation de la dispute +#### Configurations d'asymétries : compacités fonctionnelles, désactivation du tiers et fragilisation de la dispute -Toutes les dérives de régulation ne relèvent pas d’un excès unilatéral. Il arrive qu’une configuration apparaisse stable, voire fonctionnelle, par l’articulation efficace de deux pôles — mais que cette compacité même neutralise la troisième fonction essentielle, réduisant la capacité du dispositif à se maintenir dans la durée ou à s’ouvrir à la critique. Ces formes d’asymétrie binaire ne s’observent pas tant par une hypertrophie visible que par un déséquilibre d’alliance : deux fonctions se renforcent mutuellement, rendant la troisième obsolète, inopérante ou décorative. +Toutes les dérives de régulation ne relèvent pas d'un excès unilatéral. +Il arrive qu'une configuration apparaisse stable, voire fonctionnelle, +par l'articulation efficace de deux pôles — mais que cette compacité +même neutralise la troisième fonction essentielle, réduisant la capacité +du dispositif à se maintenir dans la durée ou à s'ouvrir à la critique. +Ces formes d'asymétrie binaire ne s'observent pas tant par une +hypertrophie visible que par un déséquilibre d'alliance : deux fonctions +se renforcent mutuellement, rendant la troisième obsolète, inopérante ou +décorative. -L’exemple sans doute le plus répandu aujourd’hui est celui de l’accouplement fondement–opération, où une *arcalité surcodante* (forte, explicite, revendiquée) soutient et justifie une *cratialité* intense, rationalisée, automatisée, mais sans aucune scène de différé, de contestation ou d’épreuve contradictoire. C’est le cas de nombreux dispositifs techno-réglementaires, dans lesquels une logique de « valeurs » ou de « principes » (droits fondamentaux, transition écologique, performance éducative) est immédiatement transposée en indicateurs, en outils, en grilles de gestion — sans passer par une délibération ou une médiation. On retrouve cette configuration dans certaines politiques publiques européennes, où le socle normatif est assumé comme donné (ex. : cadre climatique de l’UE) et mis en œuvre via des contrats d’objectifs, des feuilles de route, des outils de *reporting* — sans architecture de recours ni temporalité d’amendement. La fonction archicrative y est réduite à une formalité. +L'exemple sans doute le plus répandu aujourd'hui est celui de +l'accouplement fondement–opération, où une *arcalité surcodante* +(forte, explicite, revendiquée) soutient et justifie une *cratialité* +intense, rationalisée, automatisée, mais sans aucune scène de différé, +de contestation ou d'épreuve contradictoire. C'est le cas de nombreux +dispositifs techno-réglementaires, dans lesquels une logique de +« valeurs » ou de « principes » (droits fondamentaux, transition +écologique, performance éducative) est immédiatement transposée en +indicateurs, en outils, en grilles de gestion — sans passer par une +délibération ou une médiation. On retrouve cette configuration dans +certaines politiques publiques européennes, où le socle normatif est +assumé comme donné (ex. : cadre climatique de l'UE) et mis en œuvre via +des contrats d'objectifs, des feuilles de route, des outils de +*reporting* — sans architecture de recours ni temporalité +d'amendement. La fonction archicrative y est réduite à une formalité. -À l’inverse, il existe des cas d’articulation *archicration–cratialité*, où la dispute et l’action sont très présentes — mais où le fondement est fuyant, instable, non assumé. C’est typiquement le cas des dispositifs dits « participatifs » sans boussole normative claire. On débat, on consulte, on auditionne, on vote parfois — mais sur la base de critères fluctuants, de valeurs non discutées, ou d’une absence totale de cap commun. Dans certaines conventions citoyennes ou assemblées expérimentales, on mobilise massivement la délibération et l’action collective (amendements, projets pilotes, décisions concrètes), mais sans jamais définir de manière structurée ce qui fonde la légitimité du processus. Les participants eux-mêmes se demandent : *selon quelle charte ? selon quelle finalité ? selon quelle instance de validation ?* Ce déficit de fondement partagé rend la régulation instable — elle tient, mais ne s’oriente pas. Elle produit de l’effervescence sans ancrage. +À l'inverse, il existe des cas d'articulation +*archicration–cratialité*, où la dispute et l'action sont très +présentes — mais où le fondement est fuyant, instable, non assumé. +C'est typiquement le cas des dispositifs dits « participatifs » sans +boussole normative claire. On débat, on consulte, on auditionne, on vote +parfois — mais sur la base de critères fluctuants, de valeurs non +discutées, ou d'une absence totale de cap commun. Dans certaines +conventions citoyennes ou assemblées expérimentales, on mobilise +massivement la délibération et l'action collective (amendements, projets +pilotes, décisions concrètes), mais sans jamais définir de manière +structurée ce qui fonde la légitimité du processus. Les participants +eux-mêmes se demandent : *selon quelle charte ? selon quelle finalité ? +selon quelle instance de validation ?* Ce déficit de fondement partagé +rend la régulation instable — elle tient, mais ne s'oriente pas. Elle +produit de l'effervescence sans ancrage. -Troisième configuration d’asymétrie binaire : celle de l’alliance fondement–dispute, c’est-à-dire une situation dans laquelle des principes forts et des scènes de contestation réelles coexistent — mais sans vecteurs effectifs d’opération ou d’exécution. C’est le cas de certains États où la Constitution garantit une très haute exigence normative (droits fondamentaux, principes éthiques, pluralisme) et où les scènes de critique sont multiples (presse libre, ONG vigilantes, cour constitutionnelle active), mais où la capacité d’opérer ces normes est structurellement empêchée : manque de moyens, défaillance logistique, complexité institutionnelle, sous-administration chronique. L’*arcalité* et l’*archicration* sont en tension vive — mais la *cratialité* est hors service. L’État est « de droit » sur le papier, contesté avec vigueur, mais paralysé dans ses applications. L’effet est une sorte de suspension normative : tout est en droit, tout est contesté, rien n’est réalisé. +Troisième configuration d'asymétrie binaire : celle de l'alliance +fondement–dispute, c'est-à-dire une situation dans laquelle des +principes forts et des scènes de contestation réelles coexistent — mais sans vecteurs effectifs d'opération ou d'exécution. C'est le cas de +certains États où la Constitution garantit une très haute exigence +normative (droits fondamentaux, principes éthiques, pluralisme) et où +les scènes de critique sont multiples (presse libre, ONG vigilantes, +cour constitutionnelle active), mais où la capacité d'opérer ces normes +est structurellement empêchée : manque de moyens, défaillance +logistique, complexité institutionnelle, sous-administration chronique. +L'*arcalité* et l'*archicration* sont en tension vive — mais la +*cratialité* est hors service. L'État est « de droit » sur le papier, +contesté avec vigueur, mais paralysé dans ses applications. L'effet est +une sorte de suspension normative : tout est en droit, tout est +contesté, rien n'est réalisé. -Ces formes d’asymétrie binaire ne sont pas pathologiques en soi. Elles peuvent même, à court terme, assurer une forme de tenue régulatrice minimale. Mais leur vulnérabilité est structurelle : en désactivant l’un des pôles, elles perdent la capacité d’amendement, de régulation différée ou de réancrage critique. C’est pourquoi l’analyse archicratique ne doit pas se satisfaire de détecter des « présences fonctionnelles » mais doit interroger leur différenciation réelle et leur articulation mutuelle. +Ces formes d'asymétrie binaire ne sont pas pathologiques en soi. Elles +peuvent même, à court terme, assurer une forme de tenue régulatrice +minimale. Mais leur vulnérabilité est structurelle : en désactivant l'un +des pôles, elles perdent la capacité d'amendement, de régulation +différée ou de réancrage critique. C'est pourquoi l'analyse +archicratique ne doit pas se satisfaire de détecter des « présences +fonctionnelles » mais doit interroger leur différenciation réelle et +leur articulation mutuelle. -Les formes hypertopiques se reconnaissent à plusieurs signes convergents : les décisions sont irréversibles ou rendues telles par l’absence de délai de révision ; les fondements sont inaccessibles à la critique ou naturalisés comme allant de soi ; les scènes d’opposabilité existent mais sans pouvoir effectif de transformation ; les dispositifs sont structurés pour ne pas recevoir d’extérieur induisant l’absence de prise réelle ou de contestation audible. +Les formes hypertopiques se reconnaissent à plusieurs signes convergents +: les décisions sont irréversibles ou rendues telles par l'absence de +délai de révision ; les fondements sont inaccessibles à la critique ou +naturalisés comme allant de soi ; les scènes d'opposabilité existent +mais sans pouvoir effectif de transformation ; les dispositifs sont +structurés pour ne pas recevoir d'extérieur induisant l'absence de prise +réelle ou de contestation audible. -C’est précisément cette fermeture des prises — sur le plan du fondement, de l’action ou de la dispute — qui marque la décomposition de la dynamique archicratique. L’analyse ne doit donc pas se limiter à observer la présence ou l’absence de tel ou tel pôle, mais interroger le mode de relation entre eux, leur répartition différentielle, leur possibilité de remise en tension. +C'est précisément cette fermeture des prises — sur le plan du +fondement, de l'action ou de la dispute — qui marque la décomposition +de la dynamique archicratique. L'analyse ne doit donc pas se limiter à +observer la présence ou l'absence de tel ou tel pôle, mais interroger le +mode de relation entre eux, leur répartition différentielle, leur +possibilité de remise en tension. -C’est là toute la puissance critique du paradigme : identifier non seulement les formes saturées de pouvoir, mais les logiques de verrouillage différentiel, les alliances internes, les affaissements partiels, les symétries trompeuses. Une forme peut sembler équilibrée parce que chaque pôle est représenté — mais si l’un est neutralisé par excès des deux autres, ou s’il est réduit à un rôle décoratif, alors nous ne sommes plus dans une régulation soutenable, mais dans une forme de clôture fonctionnelle non viable politiquement. +C'est là toute la puissance critique du paradigme : identifier non +seulement les formes saturées de pouvoir, mais les logiques de +verrouillage différentiel, les alliances internes, les affaissements +partiels, les symétries trompeuses. Une forme peut sembler équilibrée +parce que chaque pôle est représenté — mais si l'un est neutralisé par +excès des deux autres, ou s'il est réduit à un rôle décoratif, alors +nous ne sommes plus dans une régulation soutenable, mais dans une forme +de clôture fonctionnelle non viable politiquement. -En cela, les *formes hypertopiques* nous enseignent ce que devient une régulation quand elle cesse de s’exposer à l’altérité, quand elle fonctionne trop bien pour être ajustable, ou quand elle désigne ses propres limites comme illégitimes à être contestées. +En cela, les *formes hypertopiques* nous enseignent ce que devient une +régulation quand elle cesse de s'exposer à l'altérité, quand elle +fonctionne trop bien pour être ajustable, ou quand elle désigne ses +propres limites comme illégitimes à être contestées. ### 1.5.3 — *Formes hypotopiques* : effacements, désaffiliations et désarrimages -Il est des régulations dont la fragilité réside dans le défaut même d’articulation, dans la carence silencieuse d’un ou plusieurs pôles, non par domination d’un excès, mais par manquements, effacements ou indéterminations. Ces régimes ne sont pas saturés — ils sont désarrimés, désaffiliés, incomplètement ancrés. Ce sont les *formes hypotopiques* : configurations où la triade archicratique ne parvient pas à s’incarner pleinement, soit par inachèvement historique, soit par délitement structurel, soit par marginalisation sociale. Non point des régimes de déséquilibre manifeste — mais de décrochements latents. +Il est des régulations dont la fragilité réside dans le défaut même +d'articulation, dans la carence silencieuse d'un ou plusieurs pôles, non +par domination d'un excès, mais par manquements, effacements ou +indéterminations. Ces régimes ne sont pas saturés — ils sont +désarrimés, désaffiliés, incomplètement ancrés. Ce sont les *formes +hypotopiques* : configurations où la triade archicratique ne parvient +pas à s'incarner pleinement, soit par inachèvement historique, soit par +délitement structurel, soit par marginalisation sociale. Non point des +régimes de déséquilibre manifeste — mais de décrochements latents. -Dans ces situations, ce n’est pas la force excessive d’un pôle qui domine, mais l’effacement progressif ou brutal de l’un de ses vecteurs constitutifs. Cela peut être l’arcalité qui fait défaut, lorsqu’une régulation se poursuit sous des fondements implicites, peu exposables ou dépourvus de justification reconnue. Cela peut être la cratialité qui s’effondre, lorsque les moyens d’opération sont absents, disjoints ou dysfonctionnels. Cela peut être l’archicration qui se dissout, lorsqu’aucune scène effective ne permet plus l’expression du différend, la mise en tension ou la confrontation réglée. +Dans ces situations, ce n'est pas la force excessive d'un pôle qui +domine, mais l'effacement progressif ou brutal de l'un de ses vecteurs +constitutifs. Cela peut être l'arcalité qui fait défaut, lorsqu'une +régulation se poursuit sous des fondements implicites, peu exposables ou +dépourvus de justification reconnue. Cela peut être la cratialité qui +s'effondre, lorsque les moyens d'opération sont absents, disjoints ou +dysfonctionnels. Cela peut être l'archicration qui se dissout, +lorsqu'aucune scène effective ne permet plus l'expression du différend, +la mise en tension ou la confrontation réglée. -Un exemple manifeste d’*hypoarcalité* se retrouve dans les dispositifs provisoires ou de crise, où l’action publique se déploie sur fondement implicite, suspendu ou faiblement exposable, dans une zone grise entre droit et exception. L’état d’urgence sanitaire prolongé, la gestion dérogatoire des flux migratoires ou encore les expérimentations territoriales non encadrées sont autant de cas où la *cratialité* et parfois l’*archicration* existent, mais où l’*arcalité* est suspendu, implicite ou réduit à un vague impératif de « nécessité ». Dans ces cas, la légitimité régulatrice s’efface, non pas par volonté autoritaire, mais par inachèvement ou déni de sa propre condition normative. Le pouvoir continue d’agir, mais sur un adossement symbolique, éthique ou juridique faiblement assumé, peu explicité ou difficilement opposable. +Un exemple manifeste d'*hypoarcalité* se retrouve dans les dispositifs +provisoires ou de crise, où l'action publique se déploie sur fondement +implicite, suspendu ou faiblement exposable, dans une zone grise entre +droit et exception. L'état d'urgence sanitaire prolongé, la gestion +dérogatoire des flux migratoires ou encore les expérimentations +territoriales non encadrées sont autant de cas où la *cratialité* et +parfois l'*archicration* existent, mais où l'*arcalité* est suspendu, +implicite ou réduit à un vague impératif de « nécessité ». Dans ces cas, +la légitimité régulatrice s'efface, non pas par volonté autoritaire, +mais par inachèvement ou déni de sa propre condition normative. Le +pouvoir continue d'agir, mais sur un adossement symbolique, éthique ou +juridique faiblement assumé, peu explicité ou difficilement opposable. -À l’inverse, certaines configurations présentent une *hypocratialité* : les intentions sont fortes, les textes abondants, les dispositifs délibératifs multiples — mais l’opérativité est absente ou déficiente. Ce sont les dispositifs de « papier », sur-institutionnalisés et sous-dotés, où les *arcalités* sont proclamées, les *archicrations* ouvertes, mais rien ne se passe. Les plans de transition écologique sans moyens, les comités citoyens sans budget, les programmes d’inclusion numérique sans matériel sont des formes classiques de cette dérive. Le geste politique est performé, mais peu outillé. L’action régulatrice meurt d’épuisement, faute d’infrastructure ou de continuité d’exécution. Le pôle cratial se délite, et avec lui, la consistance de tout l’édifice. +À l'inverse, certaines configurations présentent une *hypocratialité* : +les intentions sont fortes, les textes abondants, les dispositifs +délibératifs multiples — mais l'opérativité est absente ou déficiente. +Ce sont les dispositifs de « papier », sur-institutionnalisés et +sous-dotés, où les *arcalités* sont proclamées, les *archicrations* +ouvertes, mais rien ne se passe. Les plans de transition écologique sans +moyens, les comités citoyens sans budget, les programmes d'inclusion +numérique sans matériel sont des formes classiques de cette dérive. Le +geste politique est performé, mais peu outillé. L'action régulatrice +meurt d'épuisement, faute d'infrastructure ou de continuité d'exécution. +Le pôle cratial se délite, et avec lui, la consistance de tout +l'édifice. -Il existe enfin des *régimes hypoarchicratifs*, dans lesquels les tensions sont étouffées, non par répression ou simulation, mais par désertion. Les scènes de dispute s’éteignent non faute d’autorisation, mais faute de participants, faute de prise, faute d’appel possible. La démocratie locale peut en être le symptôme : dans certains conseils municipaux ruraux, toutes les délibérations sont publiques, les procès-verbaux accessibles, les voies de recours en théorie ouvertes — mais personne n’y vient, personne ne les utilise. L’espace de la critique devient désert, non pas parce qu’on l’empêche, mais parce qu’il n’a plus d’effet. On ne conteste plus ce que l’on ne croit plus modifiable. L’usure de la dispute devient une forme d’abstention persistante. +Il existe enfin des *régimes hypoarchicratifs*, dans lesquels les +tensions sont étouffées, non par répression ou simulation, mais par +désertion. Les scènes de dispute s'éteignent non faute d'autorisation, +mais faute de participants, faute de prise, faute d'appel possible. La +démocratie locale peut en être le symptôme : dans certains conseils +municipaux ruraux, toutes les délibérations sont publiques, les +procès-verbaux accessibles, les voies de recours en théorie ouvertes — mais personne n'y vient, personne ne les utilise. L'espace de la +critique devient désert, non pas parce qu'on l'empêche, mais parce qu'il +n'a plus d'effet. On ne conteste plus ce que l'on ne croit plus +modifiable. L'usure de la dispute devient une forme d'abstention +persistante. -Ces *régulations hypotopiques* sont redoutables précisément parce qu’elles ne suscitent pas d’alarme immédiate. Elles n’ont ni l’éclat tyrannique des régimes autoritaires, ni le chaos visible des formes délibératives défaillantes. Elles perdurent, parfois longtemps, dans une grande stabilité apparente, faute de tension, de friction, de dispute. Mais c’est une stabilité vide, une paix sans enjeu, un ordre à scène désertée, neutralisée ou pratiquement inopérante. +Ces *régulations hypotopiques* sont redoutables précisément parce +qu'elles ne suscitent pas d'alarme immédiate. Elles n'ont ni l'éclat +tyrannique des régimes autoritaires, ni le chaos visible des formes +délibératives défaillantes. Elles perdurent, parfois longtemps, dans une +grande stabilité apparente, faute de tension, de friction, de dispute. +Mais c'est une stabilité vide, une paix sans enjeu, un ordre à scène +désertée, neutralisée ou pratiquement inopérante. -Le paradigme archicratique nous invite ici à une vigilance particulière : il ne suffit pas de vérifier la présence formelle des trois pôles. Il faut en interroger l’effectivité, la consistance, la vitalité, dans la durée et dans la conflictualité. Une *arcalité* proclamée mais jamais invoquée est un décor. Une *cratialité* active mais sans prise humaine est un automatisme. Une *archicration* ouverte mais inopérante est une illusion procédurale. Ce qui fait régulation n’est pas l’énumération des fonctions, mais leur co-présence dynamique, différenciée, habitée. +Le paradigme archicratique nous invite ici à une vigilance particulière +: il ne suffit pas de vérifier la présence formelle des trois pôles. Il +faut en interroger l'effectivité, la consistance, la vitalité, dans la +durée et dans la conflictualité. Une *arcalité* proclamée mais jamais +invoquée est un décor. Une *cratialité* active mais sans prise humaine +est un automatisme. Une *archicration* ouverte mais inopérante est une +illusion procédurale. Ce qui fait régulation n'est pas l'énumération des +fonctions, mais leur co-présence dynamique, différenciée, habitée. -Les *formes hypotopiques* sont les signes d’une dérégulation par effacement, non par excès. Et c’est cette extinction silencieuse qui en fait des objets de vigilance majeurs dans les diagnostics archicratiques contemporains. +Les *formes hypotopiques* sont les signes d'une dérégulation par +effacement, non par excès. Et c'est cette extinction silencieuse qui en +fait des objets de vigilance majeurs dans les diagnostics archicratiques +contemporains. ### 1.5.4 — *Formes atopiques* : déréalisations, vacuités et simulacres -Il est des dispositifs de régulation où les formes sont présentes, les fonctions identifiables, les terminologies stabilisées — mais où la consistance topologique fait défaut. Ni déséquilibre (hypertopie), ni carence (hypotopie), ni tension co-viable (synchrotopie), ces configurations appartiennent à un autre régime : celui de l’irréalité régulatrice. La structure semble intacte, parfois même sophistiquée, mais les pôles archicratiques n’y trouvent plus qu’un ancrage vidé, mimé, stylisé ou rendu artefact, sans consistance vivante ni effectivité praticable. L’arcalité y est mimée plutôt qu’exposée, la cratialité y est stylisée plutôt que véritablement rendue opérante, l’archicration y est figurée plutôt qu’instituée comme scène de reprise. Nous n’avons plus affaire à une régulation tenue, mais à une scénographie vide de la régulation. +Il est des dispositifs de régulation où les formes sont présentes, les +fonctions identifiables, les terminologies stabilisées — mais où la +consistance topologique fait défaut. Ni déséquilibre (hypertopie), ni +carence (hypotopie), ni tension co-viable (synchrotopie), ces +configurations appartiennent à un autre régime : celui de l'irréalité +régulatrice. La structure semble intacte, parfois même sophistiquée, +mais les pôles archicratiques n'y trouvent plus qu'un ancrage vidé, +mimé, stylisé ou rendu artefact, sans consistance vivante ni effectivité +praticable. L'arcalité y est mimée plutôt qu'exposée, la cratialité y +est stylisée plutôt que véritablement rendue opérante, l'archicration y +est figurée plutôt qu'instituée comme scène de reprise. Nous n'avons +plus affaire à une régulation tenue, mais à une scénographie vide de la +régulation. -L’*atopie* n’est pas l’absence pure et simple. Elle est une présence vide, une figuration institutionnelle déconnectée de tout processus régulateur vivant. Elle repose souvent sur des artefacts de légitimation, des outils de pilotage automatisés, des consultations protocolaires — mais dont l’impact sur le réel est nul ou illisible. Tout y est — en apparence : des fondements, des instruments, des scènes de discussion — mais sous des formes vidées de prise, privées de contrepartie effective et incapables de transformation réelle. L’infrastructure normative est creuse, le pilotage est aveugle, la dispute est factice. On y maintient les gestes, les rites, les discours — mais sans prise vivante sur le monde qu’ils prétendent réguler. +L'*atopie* n'est pas l'absence pure et simple. Elle est une présence +vide, une figuration institutionnelle déconnectée de tout processus +régulateur vivant. Elle repose souvent sur des artefacts de +légitimation, des outils de pilotage automatisés, des consultations +protocolaires — mais dont l'impact sur le réel est nul ou illisible. +Tout y est — en apparence : des fondements, des instruments, des +scènes de discussion — mais sous des formes vidées de prise, privées +de contrepartie effective et incapables de transformation réelle. +L'infrastructure normative est creuse, le pilotage est aveugle, la +dispute est factice. On y maintient les gestes, les rites, les discours — mais sans prise vivante sur le monde qu'ils prétendent réguler. -L’atopie ne décrit donc pas une régulation effective amputée de ses pôles, mais un simulacre de régulation dans lequel les prises ne subsistent plus qu’à l’état mimé, vidé ou rendu artefact. +L'atopie ne décrit donc pas une régulation effective amputée de ses +pôles, mais un simulacre de régulation dans lequel les prises ne +subsistent plus qu'à l'état mimé, vidé ou rendu artefact. Cette atopie peut se manifester selon plusieurs figures typiques. #### La surinstitutionnalisation fictive -C’est le cas de certains dispositifs où l’empilement d’instances, de règlements, de procédures produit une illusion de maîtrise régulatrice, alors même que les décisions structurantes sont prises ailleurs, selon d’autres logiques. Par exemple, dans certaines agences parapubliques, le conseil d’administration, les chartes éthiques, les commissions techniques existent sur le papier — mais le pilotage réel est externalisé vers des cabinets de conseil, des logiques budgétaires impératives, ou des pressions politiques informelles. La structure est présente, mais le lieu de pouvoir est déplacé hors topologie. C’est une atopie par délestage invisible. +C'est le cas de certains dispositifs où l'empilement d'instances, de +règlements, de procédures produit une illusion de maîtrise régulatrice, +alors même que les décisions structurantes sont prises ailleurs, selon +d'autres logiques. Par exemple, dans certaines agences parapubliques, le +conseil d'administration, les chartes éthiques, les commissions +techniques existent sur le papier — mais le pilotage réel est +externalisé vers des cabinets de conseil, des logiques budgétaires +impératives, ou des pressions politiques informelles. La structure est +présente, mais le lieu de pouvoir est déplacé hors topologie. C'est une +atopie par délestage invisible. #### Le simulacre participatif -Une autre forme courante d’atopie régulatrice réside dans les dispositifs de concertation sans conséquence, où l’archicration est simulée : réunions de citoyens sans suites, plateformes numériques de consultation jamais relues, audits publics dont les recommandations sont ignorées. Le conflit est encadré, mais non traité. Il n’est pas censuré : il est vidé de ses effets. Ce n’est pas que les acteurs ne parlent pas — c’est que leur parole ne modifie rien. Il s’agit d’une *atopie* par captation rituelle du dissensus, où la dispute est autorisée bien que neutralisée dans son opérativité. +Une autre forme courante d'atopie régulatrice réside dans les +dispositifs de concertation sans conséquence, où l'archicration est +simulée : réunions de citoyens sans suites, plateformes numériques de +consultation jamais relues, audits publics dont les recommandations sont +ignorées. Le conflit est encadré, mais non traité. Il n'est pas censuré +: il est vidé de ses effets. Ce n'est pas que les acteurs ne parlent pas — c'est que leur parole ne modifie rien. Il s'agit d'une *atopie* par +captation rituelle du dissensus, où la dispute est autorisée bien que +neutralisée dans son opérativité. -#### L’indicateur sans scène +#### L'indicateur sans scène -Dans certaines configurations technocratiques, on produit, on publie, on affiche des indicateurs sophistiqués, des scores de performance, des indices agrégés, supposés piloter l’action. Mais ces données ne sont jamais discutées, ni contextualisées, ni opposables. Elles sont brandies comme preuves d’auto-validation, sans instance d’explication, sans temporalité de révision, sans possibilité de contestation. Ce sont des *objets cratiaux* désarrimés, flottants, incapables de s’articuler à une *arcalité* active ou à une *archicration* structurée. L’outil devient un fétiche opératoire : il agit sans être justifié, sans être discuté, sans même être compris. Elle engendre une atopie de l’intelligence régulatrice. +Dans certaines configurations technocratiques, on produit, on publie, on +affiche des indicateurs sophistiqués, des scores de performance, des +indices agrégés, supposés piloter l'action. Mais ces données ne sont +jamais discutées, ni contextualisées, ni opposables. Elles sont brandies +comme preuves d'auto-validation, sans instance d'explication, sans +temporalité de révision, sans possibilité de contestation. Ce sont des +*objets cratiaux* désarrimés, flottants, incapables de s'articuler à une +*arcalité* active ou à une *archicration* structurée. L'outil devient un +fétiche opératoire : il agit sans être justifié, sans être discuté, sans +même être compris. Elle engendre une atopie de l'intelligence +régulatrice. -#### L’invocation déconnectée +#### L'invocation déconnectée -Enfin, l’atopie peut prendre la forme d’un usage symbolique, rhétorique ou incantatoire de l’*arcalité* : on proclame les « valeurs républicaines », « l’éthique du soin », « le droit international », « les grands principes » — mais sans aucun mécanisme d’activation, d’incarnation ou d’opposabilité. Ce ne sont plus des fondements, mais des signes vidés de prise. Ils ne fondent rien, n’obligent personne, n’ouvrent aucune voie de transformation. C’est une atopie du sens : l’invocation remplace la justification, le slogan tient lieu de scène. +Enfin, l'atopie peut prendre la forme d'un usage symbolique, rhétorique +ou incantatoire de l'*arcalité* : on proclame les « valeurs +républicaines », « l'éthique du soin », « le droit international », « +les grands principes » — mais sans aucun mécanisme d'activation, +d'incarnation ou d'opposabilité. Ce ne sont plus des fondements, mais +des signes vidés de prise. Ils ne fondent rien, n'obligent personne, +n'ouvrent aucune voie de transformation. C'est une atopie du sens : +l'invocation remplace la justification, le slogan tient lieu de scène. -Ce que révèle l’analyse archicratique, c’est que la vacuité ne s’oppose pas frontalement au pouvoir : elle peut en être la forme la plus stable. Le simulacre est parfois plus durable que l’autoritarisme, car moins repérable, moins conflictuel, plus fluide. Une démocratie peut périr dans l’atopie sans jamais suspendre le droit de vote. Une administration peut devenir autistique sans jamais violer la procédure. Un dispositif de participation peut être déserté par saturation symbolique, non par coercition. +Ce que révèle l'analyse archicratique, c'est que la vacuité ne s'oppose +pas frontalement au pouvoir : elle peut en être la forme la plus stable. +Le simulacre est parfois plus durable que l'autoritarisme, car moins +repérable, moins conflictuel, plus fluide. Une démocratie peut périr +dans l'atopie sans jamais suspendre le droit de vote. Une administration +peut devenir autistique sans jamais violer la procédure. Un dispositif +de participation peut être déserté par saturation symbolique, non par +coercition. -L’*atopie* est donc le point aveugle de la critique classique. Elle ne se manifeste pas par l’excès de pouvoir, ni par son absence, mais par sa *simulation creuse*. Elle est ce moment où les fonctions sont remplies, mais où les scènes ne sont plus réellement investies, où les liens deviennent inactifs ou purement formels, et où le différé n’est plus institué comme prise effective de reprise, mais seulement figuré ou neutralisé. +L'*atopie* est donc le point aveugle de la critique classique. Elle ne +se manifeste pas par l'excès de pouvoir, ni par son absence, mais par sa +*simulation creuse*. Elle est ce moment où les fonctions sont remplies, +mais où les scènes ne sont plus réellement investies, où les liens +deviennent inactifs ou purement formels, et où le différé n'est plus +institué comme prise effective de reprise, mais seulement figuré ou +neutralisé. ### Cartographier la tenue régulatrice : vers une pragmatique des formes archicratiques -Penser la régulation en régime archicratique, c’est saisir des formes vivantes, mouvantes, concrètes. C’est comprendre comment les configurations d’un même triptyque peuvent se maintenir, se tendre, se désarticuler ou se désincarner selon des régimes topologiques distincts. En ce sens, cette section a tenté de formuler une grammaire pragmatique de la stabilité ou de l’instabilité des régulations, au plus près de leurs formes effectives. +Penser la régulation en régime archicratique, c'est saisir des formes +vivantes, mouvantes, concrètes. C'est comprendre comment les +configurations d'un même triptyque peuvent se maintenir, se tendre, se +désarticuler ou se désincarner selon des régimes topologiques distincts. +En ce sens, cette section a tenté de formuler une grammaire pragmatique +de la stabilité ou de l'instabilité des régulations, au plus près de +leurs formes effectives. -Nous avons désigné par *forme synchrotopique* la configuration rare bien que décisive où les pôles archicratiques coexistent dans une tension équilibrée : chaque pôle trouve sa place, sans confusion ni domination, et la régulation reste habitable, amendable, durable. Ce n’est pas une utopie — c’est une possibilité attestée, dont les conditions méritent d’être observées, préservées, soutenues. +Nous avons désigné par *forme synchrotopique* la configuration rare bien +que décisive où les pôles archicratiques coexistent dans une tension +équilibrée : chaque pôle trouve sa place, sans confusion ni domination, +et la régulation reste habitable, amendable, durable. Ce n'est pas une +utopie — c'est une possibilité attestée, dont les conditions méritent +d'être observées, préservées, soutenues. -Les *formes hypertopiques*, quant à elles, rendent visible la plasticité parfois toxique du paradigme : lorsque l’un ou deux des pôles submergent les autres, soit par hégémonie fondatrice (*hyperarcalité*), soit par captation instrumentale (*hypercratialité*), soit par saturation participative (archicration sans opérativité), la régulation se bloque, s’étiole ou se pervertit. Les dérives y sont patentes, mais leur diagnostic exige plus que des jugements de valeur : il réclame une lecture structurelle, patiente, stratifiée. +Les *formes hypertopiques*, quant à elles, rendent visible la plasticité +parfois toxique du paradigme : lorsque l'un ou deux des pôles submergent +les autres, soit par hégémonie fondatrice (*hyperarcalité*), soit par +captation instrumentale (*hypercratialité*), soit par saturation +participative (archicration sans opérativité), la régulation se bloque, +s'étiole ou se pervertit. Les dérives y sont patentes, mais leur +diagnostic exige plus que des jugements de valeur : il réclame une +lecture structurelle, patiente, stratifiée. -Avec les *formes hypotopiques*, le paradigme archicratique affronte une tout autre pathologie : celle de l’effacement, du désarrimage, de la déprise. Il ne s’agit plus ici d’excès, mais de manque : manque de justification, d’effectuation, de dispute. Ce n’est plus la sur-présence d’un pôle qui menace, mais l’effacement, la mise en dormance ou la désactivation apparente des principes actifs de régulation. +Avec les *formes hypotopiques*, le paradigme archicratique affronte une +tout autre pathologie : celle de l'effacement, du désarrimage, de la +déprise. Il ne s'agit plus ici d'excès, mais de manque : manque de +justification, d'effectuation, de dispute. Ce n'est plus la sur-présence +d'un pôle qui menace, mais l'effacement, la mise en dormance ou la +désactivation apparente des principes actifs de régulation. -Enfin, les formes atopiques révèlent la possibilité la plus troublante, et sans doute la plus contemporaine : celle de configurations où les pôles sont stylisés et formalisés, mais avec des prises mimées, vidées, à ancrage vivant introuvable, à scène devenue impraticable, et à effectivité régulatrice non soutenable. Ils ne “tiennent” pas au sens fort d’une régulation viable ; ils se maintiennent comme artefacts, comme figures creuses, comme apparences d’ordre. Ce sont les formes vides du pouvoir sans régulation habitable — celles qui appellent une reconstitution critique urgente du politique. +Enfin, les formes atopiques révèlent la possibilité la plus troublante, +et sans doute la plus contemporaine : celle de configurations où les +pôles sont stylisés et formalisés, mais avec des prises mimées, vidées, +à ancrage vivant introuvable, à scène devenue impraticable, et à +effectivité régulatrice non soutenable. Ils ne "tiennent" pas au sens +fort d'une régulation viable ; ils se maintiennent comme artefacts, +comme figures creuses, comme apparences d'ordre. Ce sont les formes +vides du pouvoir sans régulation habitable — celles qui appellent une +reconstitution critique urgente du politique. -Ce qui se donne à voir, à travers cette cartographie dynamique des tenues régulatrices, c’est une topologie active du paradigme archicratique : un modèle théorique qui permet de penser non seulement ses composantes, mais leur manière d’apparaître, de s’ordonner, de se désordonner, de se figer et de se dissoudre. Il s’agit d’un dispositif critique, qui articule diagnostic, description et problématisation, en donnant au lecteur — et plus encore, au chercheur, au praticien, au citoyen — des outils de repérage, de discernement, d’action. +Ce qui se donne à voir, à travers cette cartographie dynamique des +tenues régulatrices, c'est une topologie active du paradigme +archicratique : un modèle théorique qui permet de penser non seulement +ses composantes, mais leur manière d'apparaître, de s'ordonner, de se +désordonner, de se figer et de se dissoudre. Il s'agit d'un dispositif +critique, qui articule diagnostic, description et problématisation, en +donnant au lecteur — et plus encore, au chercheur, au praticien, au +citoyen — des outils de repérage, de discernement, d'action. -On peut résumer cette typologie de la manière suivante. La forme synchrotopique désigne une configuration dans laquelle les trois pôles demeurent présents, différenciés et articulés de façon suffisamment lisible pour rendre la régulation habitable, amendable et soutenable. +On peut résumer cette typologie de la manière suivante. La forme +synchrotopique désigne une configuration dans laquelle les trois pôles +demeurent présents, différenciés et articulés de façon suffisamment +lisible pour rendre la régulation habitable, amendable et soutenable. -La forme hypertopique apparaît lorsqu’un ou deux pôles deviennent hégémoniques, écrasent la tension d’ensemble et produisent des effets de verrouillage, de saturation ou d’asymétrie durable. +La forme hypertopique apparaît lorsqu'un ou deux pôles deviennent +hégémoniques, écrasent la tension d'ensemble et produisent des effets de +verrouillage, de saturation ou d'asymétrie durable. -La forme hypotopique renvoie, à l’inverse, à des configurations où certaines prises s’effacent, se désaffilient ou se mettent en latence, entraînant une dévitalisation de la régulation. +La forme hypotopique renvoie, à l'inverse, à des configurations où +certaines prises s'effacent, se désaffilient ou se mettent en latence, +entraînant une dévitalisation de la régulation. -Enfin, la forme atopique désigne les situations où les trois pôles subsistent surtout sous une forme mimée, stylisée ou factice, de sorte que la régulation ne tient plus que comme simulacre spectral. Une formalisation synoptique de ces formes, de leurs symptômes et de leurs critères d’alerte est proposée en annexe. +Enfin, la forme atopique désigne les situations où les trois pôles +subsistent surtout sous une forme mimée, stylisée ou factice, de sorte +que la régulation ne tient plus que comme simulacre spectral. Une +formalisation synoptique de ces formes, de leurs symptômes et de leurs +critères d'alerte est proposée en annexe. -La section suivante examinera comment ces formes de tenue — et leurs altérations — laissent des traces dans les pratiques, les instruments et les récits. Elle ouvrira ainsi la voie à une archéologie visible des régulations archicratiques et à un diagnostic plus approfondi des scènes politiques contemporaines. +La section suivante examinera comment ces formes de tenue — et leurs +altérations — laissent des traces dans les pratiques, les instruments +et les récits. Elle ouvrira ainsi la voie à une archéologie visible des +régulations archicratiques et à un diagnostic plus approfondi des scènes +politiques contemporaines. -## **1.6 — Repères heuristiques de l’archicratie** +## **1.6 — Repères heuristiques de l'archicratie** -La validité épistémologique d’un paradigme ne se décrète pas : elle se vérifie dans sa capacité à être confronté, disputé et mis à l’épreuve dans et par les régimes qu’il prétend éclairer. Le paradigme archicratique n’échappe pas à cette exigence critique. Sa légitimité théorique ne s’établit que dans sa capacité à rendre compte, avec rigueur analytique, empirique et humaine, des formes de régulation qui structurent les ordres politiques passés et présents, et à en objectiver les défaillances, les tensions et les zones de fragilité, voire d’effondrement symbolique ou existentiel. +La validité épistémologique d'un paradigme ne se décrète pas : elle se +vérifie dans sa capacité à être confronté, disputé et mis à l'épreuve +dans et par les régimes qu'il prétend éclairer. Le paradigme +archicratique n'échappe pas à cette exigence critique. Sa légitimité +théorique ne s'établit que dans sa capacité à rendre compte, avec +rigueur analytique, empirique et humaine, des formes de régulation qui +structurent les ordres politiques passés et présents, et à en objectiver +les défaillances, les tensions et les zones de fragilité, voire +d'effondrement symbolique ou existentiel. -Pour cela, trois conditions cardinales doivent être réunies : la détectabilité, l’intelligibilité et la falsifiabilité du paradigme. Ces trois seuils constituent à eux seuls un test de résistance paradigmatique. Ils permettent de passer de la formalisation théorique à la configuration critique des mondes régulés, où le facteur humain — en tant qu’agent, sujet, vecteur, cible et témoin — demeure le fil rouge de toute scène d’archicration véritable. +Pour cela, trois conditions cardinales doivent être réunies : la +détectabilité, l'intelligibilité et la falsifiabilité du paradigme. Ces +trois seuils constituent à eux seuls un test de résistance +paradigmatique. Ils permettent de passer de la formalisation théorique à +la configuration critique des mondes régulés, où le facteur humain — en tant qu'agent, sujet, vecteur, cible et témoin — demeure le fil +rouge de toute scène d'archicration véritable. -Cette section rassemble des repères heuristiques destinés à discerner, dans les situations, la présence et la différenciation des trois prises — arcalité, cratialité, archicration. Elle ne constitue ni une métrique ni une promesse de quantification. +Cette section rassemble des repères heuristiques destinés à discerner, +dans les situations, la présence et la différenciation des trois prises — arcalité, cratialité, archicration. Elle ne constitue ni une +métrique ni une promesse de quantification. -### 1.6.1 — Détectabilité : repères heuristiques d’une morphologie observable +### 1.6.1 — Détectabilité : repères heuristiques d'une morphologie observable -*Nota bene (périmètre).* Ce qui suit propose des repères de repérage et d’élucidation. Il ne s’agit ni d’une métrique ni d’un protocole d’évaluation. La conversion de ces repères en outils normatifs relève d’horizons de recherche ultérieurs. +*Nota bene (périmètre).* Ce qui suit propose des repères de repérage et +d'élucidation. Il ne s'agit ni d'une métrique ni d'un protocole +d'évaluation. La conversion de ces repères en outils normatifs relève +d'horizons de recherche ultérieurs. -Un modèle théorique, si raffiné soit-il, ne gagne sa pertinence qu’à proportion de sa capacité à rendre perceptible et intelligible ce qu’il prétend décrire, et à documenter ce qui, sans lui, demeurerait diffus. Une grille d’analyse du pouvoir doit donc faire apparaître la régulation comme morphologie observable : mettre à nu, dans les dispositifs les plus ténus comme dans les structures les plus massives, les articulations effectives par lesquelles un ordre se constitue, se maintient, se conteste et se transforme. +Un modèle théorique, si raffiné soit-il, ne gagne sa pertinence qu'à +proportion de sa capacité à rendre perceptible et intelligible ce qu'il +prétend décrire, et à documenter ce qui, sans lui, demeurerait diffus. +Une grille d'analyse du pouvoir doit donc faire apparaître la régulation +comme morphologie observable : mettre à nu, dans les dispositifs les +plus ténus comme dans les structures les plus massives, les +articulations effectives par lesquelles un ordre se constitue, se +maintient, se conteste et se transforme. -Détecter la configuration tripolaire — arcalité (ce qui fonde), cratialité (ce qui opère), archicration (ce qui ouvre la scène de l’épreuve) — revient à en montrer les repères dans l’expérience, l’inscription historique, le discernement politique et, surtout, l’épreuve humaine pour celles et ceux qui y sont pris. Il ne s’agit pas d’une cartographie « neutre », mais d’un travail d’élucidation située qui prend au sérieux voix, gestes, affects et savoirs ordinaires. +Détecter la configuration tripolaire — arcalité (ce qui fonde), +cratialité (ce qui opère), archicration (ce qui ouvre la scène de +l'épreuve) — revient à en montrer les repères dans l'expérience, +l'inscription historique, le discernement politique et, surtout, +l'épreuve humaine pour celles et ceux qui y sont pris. Il ne s'agit pas +d'une cartographie « neutre », mais d'un travail d'élucidation située +qui prend au sérieux voix, gestes, affects et savoirs ordinaires. -#### Repérage de l’*arcalité* +#### Repérage de l'*arcalité* -L’arcalité désigne le foyer d’énonciation et de légitimation d’un ordre — ce qui est invoqué pour le justifier, l’autoriser et lui donner sens. Elle affleure dans des textes constitutionnels, codes juridiques, mythes fondateurs, récits d’origine, dogmes religieux, doctrines techniques, algorithmes certifiés : autant d’énoncés, normes et symboles conférant une autorité initiale à la régulation. Elle est repérable dans les justifications mobilisées, les procédures d’accréditation, les documents promulgués ou les signatures symboliques revendiquées. +L'arcalité désigne le foyer d'énonciation et de légitimation d'un ordre — ce qui est invoqué pour le justifier, l'autoriser et lui donner +sens. Elle affleure dans des textes constitutionnels, codes juridiques, +mythes fondateurs, récits d'origine, dogmes religieux, doctrines +techniques, algorithmes certifiés : autant d'énoncés, normes et symboles +conférant une autorité initiale à la régulation. Elle est repérable dans +les justifications mobilisées, les procédures d'accréditation, les +documents promulgués ou les signatures symboliques revendiquées. -Mais l’*arcalité* n’est pas purement documentaire : elle est aussi horizon de sens vécu. Elle peut être intériorisée comme autorité, ressentie comme violence symbolique, expérimentée comme langage de légitimation — consenti, contredit ou réinterprété. Sa détectabilité implique donc, au-delà des textes, une attention aux récits de soumission, adhésion, dissidence ou transgression. L’autorité ne se réduit pas à sa proclamation : encore faut-il décrire comment elle existe pour les acteurs qui la perçoivent, la manipulent ou la retournent. +Mais l'*arcalité* n'est pas purement documentaire : elle est aussi +horizon de sens vécu. Elle peut être intériorisée comme autorité, +ressentie comme violence symbolique, expérimentée comme langage de +légitimation — consenti, contredit ou réinterprété. Sa détectabilité +implique donc, au-delà des textes, une attention aux récits de +soumission, adhésion, dissidence ou transgression. L'autorité ne se +réduit pas à sa proclamation : encore faut-il décrire comment elle +existe pour les acteurs qui la perçoivent, la manipulent ou la +retournent. -Ainsi, dans un dispositif de surveillance algorithmique, l’*arcalité* réside dans la « *source de vérité* » (algorithme validé, données d’apprentissage, critères d’alerte). Les questions décisives deviennent alors : *qui établit ces critères, quand, sous quelle autorité, avec quelles justifications, par quelles modalités ?* L’enjeu ne se limite pas à la technique : il engage un régime de légitimation vécu, c’est-à-dire l’horizon de sens dans lequel des existences se trouvent inscrites. +Ainsi, dans un dispositif de surveillance algorithmique, l'*arcalité* +réside dans la « *source de vérité* » (algorithme validé, données +d'apprentissage, critères d'alerte). Les questions décisives deviennent +alors : *qui établit ces critères, quand, sous quelle autorité, avec +quelles justifications, par quelles modalités ?* L'enjeu ne se limite +pas à la technique : il engage un régime de légitimation vécu, +c'est-à-dire l'horizon de sens dans lequel des existences se trouvent +inscrites. #### Repérage de la *cratialité* -La *cratialité* désigne les vecteurs effectifs d’exercice d’un ordre. Elle s’inscrit dans des infrastructures et organisations qui rendent la régulation opérante : réseaux, administrations, logiciels, interfaces, chaînes logistiques, bureaux, tableaux de suivi. C’est la trame opérationnelle par laquelle l’autorité fondatrice se traduit en décisions, effectuations, procédures, sanctions, prestations, interdictions ou allocations. Elle se repère dans des mécanismes concrets : chaînes d’exécution, délais, seuils automatiques, files d’attente, écrans de saisie, organigrammes. +La *cratialité* désigne les vecteurs effectifs d'exercice d'un ordre. +Elle s'inscrit dans des infrastructures et organisations qui rendent la +régulation opérante : réseaux, administrations, logiciels, interfaces, +chaînes logistiques, bureaux, tableaux de suivi. C'est la trame +opérationnelle par laquelle l'autorité fondatrice se traduit en +décisions, effectuations, procédures, sanctions, prestations, +interdictions ou allocations. Elle se repère dans des mécanismes +concrets : chaînes d'exécution, délais, seuils automatiques, files +d'attente, écrans de saisie, organigrammes. -Cette dimension est inséparable de l’épreuve humaine : la *cratialité* se donne comme frictions et fluidités, attentes et instantanéités, opacités et injonctions muettes, gestes de guichet et automates décisionnels. La détecter suppose d’écouter les citoyens, usagers, agents, travailleurs, fonctionnaires, et de reconstituer l’expérience vécue du pouvoir opérant — ses effets de puissance, stress, incertitude, humiliation ou effacement, mais aussi de soulagement et de reconnaissance. L’analyse technique peut être utile ; elle gagne à se doubler d’une ethnographie fine des mises en œuvre. +Cette dimension est inséparable de l'épreuve humaine : la *cratialité* +se donne comme frictions et fluidités, attentes et instantanéités, +opacités et injonctions muettes, gestes de guichet et automates +décisionnels. La détecter suppose d'écouter les citoyens, usagers, +agents, travailleurs, fonctionnaires, et de reconstituer l'expérience +vécue du pouvoir opérant — ses effets de puissance, stress, +incertitude, humiliation ou effacement, mais aussi de soulagement et de +reconnaissance. L'analyse technique peut être utile ; elle gagne à se +doubler d'une ethnographie fine des mises en œuvre. -Exemple : dans un service public numérisé, la *cratialité* apparaît dans les logiciels de traitement, interfaces usagers, circuits de validation, temps de réponse ; elle se ressent dans l’attente, la contestation, le travail d’interprétation des règles par les agents, l’amortissement des chocs. Elle se loge à la fois dans la matérialité des dispositifs et dans les médiations moins visibles de la puissance, ainsi que dans le tissu des interactions qui les portent et les modulent. +Exemple : dans un service public numérisé, la *cratialité* apparaît dans +les logiciels de traitement, interfaces usagers, circuits de validation, +temps de réponse ; elle se ressent dans l'attente, la contestation, le +travail d'interprétation des règles par les agents, l'amortissement des +chocs. Elle se loge à la fois dans la matérialité des dispositifs et +dans les médiations moins visibles de la puissance, ainsi que dans le +tissu des interactions qui les portent et les modulent. -#### Repérage de l’*archicration* +#### Repérage de l'*archicration* -L’*archicration* désigne l’espace-temps institué où une décision peut être interrogée, une justification contestée, un effet rapporté, un critère rediscuté. Elle n’est pas réductible aux contre-pouvoirs formels de l’État de droit : elle peut se manifester dans un recours gracieux, un droit d’appel, une commission d’examen, une médiation, un délai suspensif, un forum public, un espace médiatique reconnu, un rituel de palabre, un conseil de village. Les formes sont multiples, mais la fonction demeure la même : instituer du recours et du différé là où le pouvoir accepte de se justifier et de supporter le contradictoire. +L'*archicration* désigne l'espace-temps institué où une décision peut +être interrogée, une justification contestée, un effet rapporté, un +critère rediscuté. Elle n'est pas réductible aux contre-pouvoirs formels +de l'État de droit : elle peut se manifester dans un recours gracieux, +un droit d'appel, une commission d'examen, une médiation, un délai +suspensif, un forum public, un espace médiatique reconnu, un rituel de +palabre, un conseil de village. Les formes sont multiples, mais la +fonction demeure la même : instituer du recours et du différé là où le +pouvoir accepte de se justifier et de supporter le contradictoire. -Pour éviter toute extension excessive du concept, il faut cependant en préciser le seuil minimal. Une scène ne peut être dite archicratique au sens strict que si trois conditions sont réunies. D’abord, une *condition de comparution* : les existences affectées, ou leurs mandataires, doivent pouvoir apparaître dans un espace où la décision ne les traite pas seulement comme objets de gestion. Ensuite, une *condition d’explicitation* : les critères, motifs, chaînes opératoires ou justifications en cause doivent pouvoir être rendus intelligibles, au moins dans une mesure suffisante pour ouvrir une contradiction. Enfin, une *condition de reprise* : la scène doit disposer d’une capacité réelle de révision, de requalification ou de suspension, et non d’une simple fonction expressive sans effet. +Pour éviter toute extension excessive du concept, il faut cependant en +préciser le seuil minimal. Une scène ne peut être dite archicratique au +sens strict que si trois conditions sont réunies. D'abord, une +*condition de comparution* : les existences affectées, ou leurs +mandataires, doivent pouvoir apparaître dans un espace où la décision ne +les traite pas seulement comme objets de gestion. Ensuite, une +*condition d'explicitation* : les critères, motifs, chaînes opératoires +ou justifications en cause doivent pouvoir être rendus intelligibles, au +moins dans une mesure suffisante pour ouvrir une contradiction. Enfin, +une *condition de reprise* : la scène doit disposer d'une capacité +réelle de révision, de requalification ou de suspension, et non d'une +simple fonction expressive sans effet. -Là où l’une de ces conditions manque, il peut subsister de la procédure, de la plainte, de la consultation, voire un décor d’ouverture ; mais il ne s’agit pas encore d’archicration à proprement parler. On entre alors dans les régimes de simulation, d’oblitération ou de neutralisation scénique. +Là où l'une de ces conditions manque, il peut subsister de la procédure, +de la plainte, de la consultation, voire un décor d'ouverture ; mais il +ne s'agit pas encore d'archicration à proprement parler. On entre alors +dans les régimes de simulation, d'oblitération ou de neutralisation +scénique. -La détectabilité de l’*archicration* ne consiste pas uniquement à pointer des procédures sur un organigramme. Elle s’éprouve dans la possibilité effective de raconter ce qui a été subi, revendiquer un droit, demander révision, formuler l’écart, instituer un débat. Elle s’indexe sur la capacité d’écoute du dissensus et l’intégration de la conflictualité dans les formes de régulation. Détecter l’*archicration* suppose donc d’observer à la fois des dispositifs d’expression et des trajectoires vécues : accessibilité réelle des recours, lisibilité des démarches, possibilité concrète pour les personnes concernées de se faire entendre. +La détectabilité de l'*archicration* ne consiste pas uniquement à +pointer des procédures sur un organigramme. Elle s'éprouve dans la +possibilité effective de raconter ce qui a été subi, revendiquer un +droit, demander révision, formuler l'écart, instituer un débat. Elle +s'indexe sur la capacité d'écoute du dissensus et l'intégration de la +conflictualité dans les formes de régulation. Détecter l'*archicration* +suppose donc d'observer à la fois des dispositifs d'expression et des +trajectoires vécues : accessibilité réelle des recours, lisibilité des +démarches, possibilité concrète pour les personnes concernées de se +faire entendre. -À titre d’illustration, un système d’attribution automatisée d’aides sociales manifeste une présence d’*archicration* lorsqu’il prévoit — de façon concrète et accessible — une scène différée d’examen humain : un temps de suspension de la décision automatique, un lieu où l’usager expose sa singularité, où l’agent peut corriger l’automate, où le récit retrouve droit de cité. Il s’agit d’un critère de lecture, non d’une norme d’évaluation. +À titre d'illustration, un système d'attribution automatisée d'aides +sociales manifeste une présence d'*archicration* lorsqu'il prévoit — de façon concrète et accessible — une scène différée d'examen humain : +un temps de suspension de la décision automatique, un lieu où l'usager +expose sa singularité, où l'agent peut corriger l'automate, où le récit +retrouve droit de cité. Il s'agit d'un critère de lecture, non d'une +norme d'évaluation. -En somme, la détectabilité est ici un geste critique et herméneutique : reconstruire, à partir d’archives et d’expériences vécues, le système de justification, d’opération et de mise à l’épreuve d’un ordre donné. Sous la surface des procédures, il s’agit de faire réapparaître le théâtre vivant du pouvoir — textes, infrastructures et scènes de parole —, et de restituer aux sujets leur rôle de témoins, acteurs et critiques dans la configuration du politique, quel que soit le domaine d’inscription. +En somme, la détectabilité est ici un geste critique et herméneutique : +reconstruire, à partir d'archives et d'expériences vécues, le système de +justification, d'opération et de mise à l'épreuve d'un ordre donné. Sous +la surface des procédures, il s'agit de faire réapparaître le théâtre +vivant du pouvoir — textes, infrastructures et scènes de parole —, +et de restituer aux sujets leur rôle de témoins, acteurs et critiques +dans la configuration du politique, quel que soit le domaine +d'inscription. -### 1.6.2 — Repères heuristiques pour l’intelligibilité des régulations +### 1.6.2 — Repères heuristiques pour l'intelligibilité des régulations -L’archicratie, destinée à saisir autrement les modalités différenciées, évolutives et souvent opaques de la régulation dans les sociétés humaines, n’entend pas livrer ici un instrument de mesure, mais proposer une grammaire de discernement — ancrée dans la triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration — pour éclairer des situations concrètes et situées. +L'archicratie, destinée à saisir autrement les modalités différenciées, +évolutives et souvent opaques de la régulation dans les sociétés +humaines, n'entend pas livrer ici un instrument de mesure, mais proposer +une grammaire de discernement — ancrée dans la triade +arcalité–cratialité–archicration — pour éclairer des situations +concrètes et situées. -Nous vivons un moment où l’opérativité est fréquemment dévoyée par la prolifération de mesures pseudo-scientifiques élevées au rang de dispositifs de vérité à scène neutralisée, comprimée ou relocalisée hors d’atteinte. Tableaux de bord, indicateurs de performance, grilles d’évaluation, algorithmes prédictifs et plateformes de pilotage étendent ainsi une régulation dont la scène d’épreuve se trouve neutralisée : les sources demeurent insuffisamment explicitées, les mécanismes ne sont pas pratiquement exposables, et le différé interprétatif devient fictif ou inopérant. Sous prétexte de rationalisation, ces dispositifs normaient l’action en amont et resserraient en aval les marges du possible. La mesure tend alors à se faire sa propre justification, neutralisant le conflit constitutif du social et minant les conditions mêmes d’une archicration effective. +Nous vivons un moment où l'opérativité est fréquemment dévoyée par la +prolifération de mesures pseudo-scientifiques élevées au rang de +dispositifs de vérité à scène neutralisée, comprimée ou relocalisée hors +d'atteinte. Tableaux de bord, indicateurs de performance, grilles +d'évaluation, algorithmes prédictifs et plateformes de pilotage étendent +ainsi une régulation dont la scène d'épreuve se trouve neutralisée : les +sources demeurent insuffisamment explicitées, les mécanismes ne sont pas +pratiquement exposables, et le différé interprétatif devient fictif ou +inopérant. Sous prétexte de rationalisation, ces dispositifs normaient +l'action en amont et resserraient en aval les marges du possible. La +mesure tend alors à se faire sa propre justification, neutralisant le +conflit constitutif du social et minant les conditions mêmes d'une +archicration effective. -Face à cette saturation instrumentale, la tâche du paradigme archicratique est plus modeste et plus exigeante : non pas proposer un outil de pilotage alternatif, ni concurrencer les instruments existants sur leur terrain, mais offrir des repères heuristiques pour identifier des formes différenciées de légitimation, d’opération et de contestation dans des contextes socio-politiques, historiques et institutionnels situés. Ces repères ne visent ni universalité formelle ni exclusivité, mais pertinence contextualisée. Ils se proposent comme scène d’interprétation ouverte, susceptible d’être discutée et ajustée par les acteurs. Ils forment une matrice de discernement, non un schéma d’application. -Nota bene : la conversion de ces repères en protocoles d’évaluation relève d’un programme ultérieur, non traité dans l’ouvrage. +Face à cette saturation instrumentale, la tâche du paradigme +archicratique est plus modeste et plus exigeante : non pas proposer un +outil de pilotage alternatif, ni concurrencer les instruments existants +sur leur terrain, mais offrir des repères heuristiques pour identifier +des formes différenciées de légitimation, d'opération et de contestation +dans des contextes socio-politiques, historiques et institutionnels +situés. Ces repères ne visent ni universalité formelle ni exclusivité, +mais pertinence contextualisée. Ils se proposent comme scène +d'interprétation ouverte, susceptible d'être discutée et ajustée par les +acteurs. Ils forment une matrice de discernement, non un schéma +d'application.\ +Nota bene : la conversion de ces repères en protocoles d'évaluation +relève d'un programme ultérieur, non traité dans l'ouvrage. -C’est à cette condition que la lecture archicratique fera apparaître ce qui, dans les dispositifs contemporains, relève d’un agencement intelligible et modifiable des trois pôles régulateurs, et mettra en lumière ce qui oblitère la visibilité, l’appropriation et la possibilité de remédiation par les sujets concernés. Loin de prétendre tout voir, il s’agit d’offrir une grille de lecture capable de faire réapparaître certains plans invisibilisés, de faire entendre ce qui fut disqualifié comme bruit, et de signifier ce qui a été neutralisé sous forme d’automatismes ou de protocoles techniques. +C'est à cette condition que la lecture archicratique fera apparaître ce +qui, dans les dispositifs contemporains, relève d'un agencement +intelligible et modifiable des trois pôles régulateurs, et mettra en +lumière ce qui oblitère la visibilité, l'appropriation et la possibilité +de remédiation par les sujets concernés. Loin de prétendre tout voir, il +s'agit d'offrir une grille de lecture capable de faire réapparaître +certains plans invisibilisés, de faire entendre ce qui fut disqualifié +comme bruit, et de signifier ce qui a été neutralisé sous forme +d'automatismes ou de protocoles techniques. -Dans cette perspective, l’analyse des régimes de régulation suppose d’abord d’identifier, dans un contexte donné, les modalités de fondation, d’exécution et de mise en scène de la contestation de l’ordre institué. L’*arcalité* désigne la forme sous laquelle un dispositif affirme son autorité première, c’est-à-dire la source à laquelle il s’adosse pour légitimer son existence (norme juridique explicite, récit fondateur, mandat expert, artefact technologique, morale partagée, impératif supposé indiscutable — santé publique, sécurité nationale, intérêt général, etc.). +Dans cette perspective, l'analyse des régimes de régulation suppose +d'abord d'identifier, dans un contexte donné, les modalités de +fondation, d'exécution et de mise en scène de la contestation de l'ordre +institué. L'*arcalité* désigne la forme sous laquelle un dispositif +affirme son autorité première, c'est-à-dire la source à laquelle il +s'adosse pour légitimer son existence (norme juridique explicite, récit +fondateur, mandat expert, artefact technologique, morale partagée, +impératif supposé indiscutable — santé publique, sécurité nationale, +intérêt général, etc.). -L’analyse de l’*arcalité* interroge la nature de cette source, sa provenance, son niveau de formalisation, son degré de lisibilité, sa disponibilité publique, sa capacité à être remise en question et, surtout, sa manière d’être éprouvée, contestée ou naturalisée par les individus qui y sont soumis. Car une *arcalité* peut être invoquée tout en demeurant hermétique ou inaccessible (p. ex. modèles d’apprentissage opaques), ou au contraire ne jamais être explicite et pourtant régir puissamment les comportements (normes morales intériorisées). +L'analyse de l'*arcalité* interroge la nature de cette source, sa +provenance, son niveau de formalisation, son degré de lisibilité, sa +disponibilité publique, sa capacité à être remise en question et, +surtout, sa manière d'être éprouvée, contestée ou naturalisée par les +individus qui y sont soumis. Car une *arcalité* peut être invoquée tout +en demeurant hermétique ou inaccessible (p. ex. modèles d'apprentissage +opaques), ou au contraire ne jamais être explicite et pourtant régir +puissamment les comportements (normes morales intériorisées). -Ainsi, un système d’allocation automatisée des aides sociales peut reposer sur un algorithme certifié par une autorité technique, dont la logique de calcul est protégée par le secret des affaires ou rendue illisible par sa complexité. L’*arcalité* y est présente (invoquée comme fondement) et absente (indéchiffrable, inappropriable, irréversible). Le fondement devient injonction ; la légitimation, énoncé clôturé. L’enjeu n’est pas exclusivement la formalisation de la source, mais son accessibilité, sa traduction, sa contestation et, ultimement, sa possibilité d’appropriation discursive et politique. +Ainsi, un système d'allocation automatisée des aides sociales peut +reposer sur un algorithme certifié par une autorité technique, dont la +logique de calcul est protégée par le secret des affaires ou rendue +illisible par sa complexité. L'*arcalité* y est présente (invoquée comme +fondement) et absente (indéchiffrable, inappropriable, irréversible). Le +fondement devient injonction ; la légitimation, énoncé clôturé. L'enjeu +n'est pas exclusivement la formalisation de la source, mais son +accessibilité, sa traduction, sa contestation et, ultimement, sa +possibilité d'appropriation discursive et politique. -La *cratialité* engage la matérialité de la régulation : vecteurs par lesquels le pouvoir fondateur se déploie dans les corps, infrastructures, interfaces, institutions, séquences de décision, outils de traitement, supports de validation, temporalités d’exécution. Il s’agit d’en reconstituer la texture — matérielle, affective, temporelle — et d’en restituer la configuration d’ensemble. +La *cratialité* engage la matérialité de la régulation : vecteurs par +lesquels le pouvoir fondateur se déploie dans les corps, +infrastructures, interfaces, institutions, séquences de décision, outils +de traitement, supports de validation, temporalités d'exécution. Il +s'agit d'en reconstituer la texture — matérielle, affective, +temporelle — et d'en restituer la configuration d'ensemble. -Prenons un service public numérisé où les usagers passent par un portail en ligne pour faire valoir leurs droits. Si l’interface est difficile d’accès, les délais imprévisibles, les interlocuteurs introuvables, les rejets automatiques systématiques et le cheminement du dossier intraçable, la *cratialité* devient désincarnée. Le pouvoir agit sans médiation perceptible, sans mémoire explicite, sans sujet identifiable : il se transmute en anonymat algorithmique. La lecture archicratique vise alors à rendre lisible cette expérience — non pour l’évaluer selon des standards extérieurs, mais pour en reconstruire la structure invisible, nommer la scène manquante et préparer l’élucidation critique. +Prenons un service public numérisé où les usagers passent par un portail +en ligne pour faire valoir leurs droits. Si l'interface est difficile +d'accès, les délais imprévisibles, les interlocuteurs introuvables, les +rejets automatiques systématiques et le cheminement du dossier +intraçable, la *cratialité* devient désincarnée. Le pouvoir agit sans +médiation perceptible, sans mémoire explicite, sans sujet identifiable : +il se transmute en anonymat algorithmique. La lecture archicratique vise +alors à rendre lisible cette expérience — non pour l'évaluer selon des +standards extérieurs, mais pour en reconstruire la structure invisible, +nommer la scène manquante et préparer l'élucidation critique. -Enfin, l’*archicration* constitue le point névralgique de la lecture archicratique. Elle ne se réduit ni au droit au recours formel ni à une contradiction abstraite : elle désigne la scène instituée, différée, située, où le pouvoir se laisse interroger, où la décision devient amendable, où le fondement redevient discours. Instance juridictionnelle, médiation, espace de débat, conseil pluraliste, rituel, forum numérique, procédure contradictoire, délai suspensif : la forme importe moins que la possibilité effective pour les agents affectés de faire entendre leur voix, demander des comptes, suspendre, raconter une autre version, transformer le dispositif en scène contradictoire. +Enfin, l'*archicration* constitue le point névralgique de la lecture +archicratique. Elle ne se réduit ni au droit au recours formel ni à une +contradiction abstraite : elle désigne la scène instituée, différée, +située, où le pouvoir se laisse interroger, où la décision devient +amendable, où le fondement redevient discours. Instance +juridictionnelle, médiation, espace de débat, conseil pluraliste, +rituel, forum numérique, procédure contradictoire, délai suspensif : la +forme importe moins que la possibilité effective pour les agents +affectés de faire entendre leur voix, demander des comptes, suspendre, +raconter une autre version, transformer le dispositif en scène +contradictoire. -Une régulation privée d’archicration effective est une régulation sans visage. Une décision sans différé praticable est une décision sans interlocuteur. Là où le contradictoire disparaît ou devient inopérant, vacille non seulement la démocratie, mais la capacité d’une société à se représenter comme traversée de conflits et de désaccords potentiellement féconds. La lecture archicratique consiste à repérer, dans chaque dispositif, les conditions minimales d’une telle scène, à diagnostiquer les formes de son effacement et à préfigurer les moyens de sa réapparition. L’archicration n’est pas un supplément : elle est la condition de possibilité de toute régulation viable. +Une régulation privée d'archicration effective est une régulation sans +visage. Une décision sans différé praticable est une décision sans +interlocuteur. Là où le contradictoire disparaît ou devient inopérant, +vacille non seulement la démocratie, mais la capacité d'une société à se +représenter comme traversée de conflits et de désaccords potentiellement +féconds. La lecture archicratique consiste à repérer, dans chaque +dispositif, les conditions minimales d'une telle scène, à diagnostiquer +les formes de son effacement et à préfigurer les moyens de sa +réapparition. L'archicration n'est pas un supplément : elle est la +condition de possibilité de toute régulation viable. -Une telle lecture ne peut être univoque ni standardisée. Elle suppose une approche située, transversale, dialogique, mobilisant des savoirs institutionnels, juridiques, techniques, mais aussi ethnographiques, narratifs, subjectifs. Elle engage des compétences et lectures croisées, et exige que les sujets soient parties prenantes de l’interprétation. C’est dans les récits, résistances, bifurcations, plaintes et silences que la régulation — ou son absence — devient visible. C’est dans les marges, interstices et incidents que l’*archicratie* trouve sa matière vive. +Une telle lecture ne peut être univoque ni standardisée. Elle suppose +une approche située, transversale, dialogique, mobilisant des savoirs +institutionnels, juridiques, techniques, mais aussi ethnographiques, +narratifs, subjectifs. Elle engage des compétences et lectures croisées, +et exige que les sujets soient parties prenantes de l'interprétation. +C'est dans les récits, résistances, bifurcations, plaintes et silences +que la régulation — ou son absence — devient visible. C'est dans les +marges, interstices et incidents que l'*archicratie* trouve sa matière +vive. -Ainsi conçue, l’élucidation archicratique n’est ni une opération de gestion ni une méthodologie de contrôle. Elle est un acte d’intelligibilité politique, une tentative d’éveil critique, une réouverture des possibles, une structure de discernement rendant les dispositifs lisibles, discutables, réparables. Elle ne clôt pas le réel, elle l’ouvre ; elle ne fige pas le pouvoir, elle le met en scène ; elle ne définit pas l’ordre, elle en institue la critique — afin qu’aucune régulation n’échappe à la lumière du langage, à l’épreuve du différé, et à la mémoire des vivants. +Ainsi conçue, l'élucidation archicratique n'est ni une opération de +gestion ni une méthodologie de contrôle. Elle est un acte +d'intelligibilité politique, une tentative d'éveil critique, une +réouverture des possibles, une structure de discernement rendant les +dispositifs lisibles, discutables, réparables. Elle ne clôt pas le réel, +elle l'ouvre ; elle ne fige pas le pouvoir, elle le met en scène ; elle +ne définit pas l'ordre, elle en institue la critique — afin qu'aucune +régulation n'échappe à la lumière du langage, à l'épreuve du différé, et +à la mémoire des vivants. ### 1.6.3 — Ouverture critique et révision -Toute proposition paradigmatique qui aspire à valoir comme grille d’intelligibilité du réel doit intégrer la possibilité de sa propre révision. Sans réactiver un dogme positiviste, il s’agit d’adopter une éthique de l’exposition : la pensée de la régulation doit se laisser relire, amender, déplacer — comme une archicration appliquée à la théorie elle-même. +Toute proposition paradigmatique qui aspire à valoir comme grille +d'intelligibilité du réel doit intégrer la possibilité de sa propre +révision. Sans réactiver un dogme positiviste, il s'agit d'adopter une +éthique de l'exposition : la pensée de la régulation doit se laisser +relire, amender, déplacer — comme une archicration appliquée à la +théorie elle-même. -L’enjeu n’est pas d’ériger un tribunal métrique extérieur, mais d’intégrer à même le paradigme des gestes d’auto-examen : expliciter ses conditions de validité, reconnaître ses angles morts, décrire ses zones d’indifférence et assumer la possibilité qu’il ne suffise pas à rendre intelligibles certaines configurations. La théorie renonce ainsi à se faire verrou ; elle se donne comme scène. +L'enjeu n'est pas d'ériger un tribunal métrique extérieur, mais +d'intégrer à même le paradigme des gestes d'auto-examen : expliciter ses +conditions de validité, reconnaître ses angles morts, décrire ses zones +d'indifférence et assumer la possibilité qu'il ne suffise pas à rendre +intelligibles certaines configurations. La théorie renonce ainsi à se +faire verrou ; elle se donne comme scène. -Concrètement, cela implique de confronter la triade *arcalité–cratialité–archicration* à des situations où ses prises sont difficiles à repérer, ou se confondent. Si, face à un régime communautaire non étatique (logiques d’honneur, réputation, équilibres symboliques), les prises se dissolvent à la lecture, le constat n’invalide pas la proposition : il borne son champ d’application, affine ses seuils de lisibilité, complexifie ses opérateurs (intégrer le silence comme forme, l’invisible comme matrice, l’inappropriable comme symptôme). +Concrètement, cela implique de confronter la triade +*arcalité–cratialité–archicration* à des situations où ses prises sont +difficiles à repérer, ou se confondent. Si, face à un régime +communautaire non étatique (logiques d'honneur, réputation, équilibres +symboliques), les prises se dissolvent à la lecture, le constat +n'invalide pas la proposition : il borne son champ d'application, affine +ses seuils de lisibilité, complexifie ses opérateurs (intégrer le +silence comme forme, l'invisible comme matrice, l'inappropriable comme +symptôme). -De même, il convient de distinguer les scènes formelles (droit au recours) des scènes effectives (pouvoir réel de faire valoir un récit contraire). Les simulacres d’*archicration* — décor procédural sans différé véritable — doivent pouvoir être nommés comme tels : non par une mesure, mais par une lecture critique des conditions qui rendent ou non audible le dissentiment ou le dissensus. +De même, il convient de distinguer les scènes formelles (droit au +recours) des scènes effectives (pouvoir réel de faire valoir un récit +contraire). Les simulacres d'*archicration* — décor procédural sans +différé véritable — doivent pouvoir être nommés comme tels : non par +une mesure, mais par une lecture critique des conditions qui rendent ou +non audible le dissentiment ou le dissensus. -Cette ouverture critique a une double vertu : elle maintient le paradigme comme outil de lecture (plutôt qu’un gabarit qui écrase le réel) et elle l’immunise contre son propre fétichisme (la régulation sans scène ne doit pas devenir une lecture sans scène d’elle-même). Son lieu de véridiction est celui d’une exposition continue à la discussion, à la révision et à la co-élaboration. +Cette ouverture critique a une double vertu : elle maintient le +paradigme comme outil de lecture (plutôt qu'un gabarit qui écrase le +réel) et elle l'immunise contre son propre fétichisme (la régulation +sans scène ne doit pas devenir une lecture sans scène d'elle-même). Son +lieu de véridiction est celui d'une exposition continue à la discussion, +à la révision et à la co-élaboration. -*Clause de périmètre.* Les modalités concrètes d’une telle révision (protocoles, comparaisons systématiques, simulations éventuelles) relèvent d’horizons de recherche ultérieurs. Le présent essai se limite consciemment à fonder l’hypothèse archicratique et à en déployer la grammaire. Rien de plus, rien de moins. +*Clause de périmètre.* Les modalités concrètes d'une telle révision +(protocoles, comparaisons systématiques, simulations éventuelles) +relèvent d'horizons de recherche ultérieurs. Le présent essai se limite +consciemment à fonder l'hypothèse archicratique et à en déployer la +grammaire. Rien de plus, rien de moins. ### 1.6.4 — Scènes, seuils, temporalités : vers une grammaire des différés archicratiques -Ce qui permet à un ordre d’exister autrement que comme pur mécanisme, ce n’est ni la seule justification qu’il se donne, ni la seule puissance par laquelle il s’exécute, mais le lieu — concret, institué, habitable — où il consent à paraître et à se laisser reprendre. Nous appelons « *scène* » cet espace-temps où la décision quitte l’opacité des coulisses, accepte la lumière, endosse l’obligation de répondre, et reconnaît à ceux qu’elle affecte le droit d’une parole qui ne soit ni supplique ni bruit, mais adresse recevable. La *scène* dans l’appareillage archicratique n’est pas un décor, mais une condition de vérité. Là où elle manque, le fondement se fige en dogme, l’exécution se retire dans la machinerie, et la contestation se dissout en rumeur impuissante. Là où elle existe, une société se découvre encore capable de tenir ensemble l’autorité et la critique, l’efficacité et la justice, l’urgence et l’examen. +Ce qui permet à un ordre d'exister autrement que comme pur mécanisme, ce +n'est ni la seule justification qu'il se donne, ni la seule puissance +par laquelle il s'exécute, mais le lieu — concret, institué, habitable — où il consent à paraître et à se laisser reprendre. Nous appelons « +*scène* » cet espace-temps où la décision quitte l'opacité des +coulisses, accepte la lumière, endosse l'obligation de répondre, et +reconnaît à ceux qu'elle affecte le droit d'une parole qui ne soit ni +supplique ni bruit, mais adresse recevable. La *scène* dans +l'appareillage archicratique n'est pas un décor, mais une condition de +vérité. Là où elle manque, le fondement se fige en dogme, l'exécution se +retire dans la machinerie, et la contestation se dissout en rumeur +impuissante. Là où elle existe, une société se découvre encore capable +de tenir ensemble l'autorité et la critique, l'efficacité et la justice, +l'urgence et l'examen. -Nommer la *scène*, c’est aussitôt reconnaître qu’elle ne se confond pas avec une salle ni avec un protocole. Elle exige une mise en présence et une mise à distance simultanées. Une *mise en présence* parce que l’on y compare enfin ce qui, jusqu’alors, demeurait dissocié — les textes, les preuves, les motifs, les effets —, et parce que des voix y prennent corps, avec leur grain, leurs hésitations, leurs fragilités. Une *mise à distance* ensuite, parce qu’y est institué un délai, un temps d’arrêt qui suspend l’exécution et protège la parole naissante de la précipitation qui l’écrase. La *scène* est donc intrinsèquement *différée* ; elle ferme un instant le monde pour mieux le rouvrir. Elle ne réclame pas la perfection des conditions, mais la possibilité réelle d’une comparution : pouvoir entrer, parler, être entendu, et, s’il y a lieu, obtenir qu’un geste se corrige. +Nommer la *scène*, c'est aussitôt reconnaître qu'elle ne se confond pas +avec une salle ni avec un protocole. Elle exige une mise en présence et +une mise à distance simultanées. Une *mise en présence* parce que l'on y +compare enfin ce qui, jusqu'alors, demeurait dissocié — les textes, +les preuves, les motifs, les effets —, et parce que des voix y +prennent corps, avec leur grain, leurs hésitations, leurs fragilités. +Une *mise à distance* ensuite, parce qu'y est institué un délai, un +temps d'arrêt qui suspend l'exécution et protège la parole naissante de +la précipitation qui l'écrase. La *scène* est donc intrinsèquement +*différée* ; elle ferme un instant le monde pour mieux le rouvrir. Elle +ne réclame pas la perfection des conditions, mais la possibilité réelle +d'une comparution : pouvoir entrer, parler, être entendu, et, s'il y a +lieu, obtenir qu'un geste se corrige. -De cette *scène* procède la notion de *seuil*. *Une scène sans seuil n’est qu’un vœu* : elle laisse intacte l’asymétrie entre ceux qui savent et ceux qui subissent. Le seuil règle l’accès — coût temporel, langagier, matériel ou économique pour se présenter —, ordonne la suspension — l’arrêt des effets tant que l’examen n’a pas eu lieu —, garantit la réversibilité — non l’annulation illimitée, mais la possibilité d’un retour sur décision qui ne soit pas un simulacre —, assure la publicité — visibilité raisonnée de ce qui s’y joue, afin que la société sache ce qui la régit —, et institue la mémoire — trace exploitable qui permette non seulement de juger aujourd’hui, mais d’apprendre demain. +De cette *scène* procède la notion de *seuil*. *Une scène sans seuil +n'est qu'un vœu* : elle laisse intacte l'asymétrie entre ceux qui savent +et ceux qui subissent. Le seuil règle l'accès — coût temporel, +langagier, matériel ou économique pour se présenter —, ordonne la +suspension — l'arrêt des effets tant que l'examen n'a pas eu lieu —, +garantit la réversibilité — non l'annulation illimitée, mais la +possibilité d'un retour sur décision qui ne soit pas un simulacre —, +assure la publicité — visibilité raisonnée de ce qui s'y joue, afin +que la société sache ce qui la régit —, et institue la mémoire — trace exploitable qui permette non seulement de juger aujourd'hui, mais +d'apprendre demain. -Ces cinq fonctions ne valent qu’ensemble : l’accès sans suspension n’épargne rien ; la suspension sans réversibilité humilie ; la publicité sans mémoire agite ; la mémoire sans accès pétrifie. Le *seuil* est l’*art de proportionner* : on y compose l’exigence de protection des personnes et l’exigence de responsabilité des institutions, on y tempère la rapidité nécessaire par la juste lenteur. +Ces cinq fonctions ne valent qu'ensemble : l'accès sans suspension +n'épargne rien ; la suspension sans réversibilité humilie ; la publicité +sans mémoire agite ; la mémoire sans accès pétrifie. Le *seuil* est +l'*art de proportionner* : on y compose l'exigence de protection des +personnes et l'exigence de responsabilité des institutions, on y tempère +la rapidité nécessaire par la juste lenteur. -Reste la *temporalité*, qui donne à la *scène* et au *seuil* leur véritable portée. Contre la fascination du « tout, tout de suite » — cette idolâtrie du même instant pour la détection, la qualification et l’exécution —, une régulation digne de ce nom invente du temps et prend son temps. Elle ménage des *latences* où l’on rassemble les pièces et les mots ; des *vacations* où l’on confronte des versions sans que l’une écrase l’autre d’emblée ; des *reprises* où l’on revient sur ce qui a été tranché, non pour se perdre en repentirs, mais pour apprendre de ses propres décisions. Ce temps n’est pas un luxe moral : il est la matière première de la justice. Là où il disparaît, tout devient flux : on agit avant d’avoir pensé, on punit avant d’avoir entendu, on classe avant d’avoir compris. Là où il se réinstaure, le monde reprend souffle et, avec lui, la faculté des humains à se rendre intelligibles les situations aux uns et aux autres. +Reste la *temporalité*, qui donne à la *scène* et au *seuil* leur +véritable portée. Contre la fascination du « tout, tout de suite » — cette idolâtrie du même instant pour la détection, la qualification et +l'exécution —, une régulation digne de ce nom invente du temps et +prend son temps. Elle ménage des *latences* où l'on rassemble les pièces +et les mots ; des *vacations* où l'on confronte des versions sans que +l'une écrase l'autre d'emblée ; des *reprises* où l'on revient sur ce +qui a été tranché, non pour se perdre en repentirs, mais pour apprendre +de ses propres décisions. Ce temps n'est pas un luxe moral : il est la +matière première de la justice. Là où il disparaît, tout devient flux : +on agit avant d'avoir pensé, on punit avant d'avoir entendu, on classe +avant d'avoir compris. Là où il se réinstaure, le monde reprend souffle +et, avec lui, la faculté des humains à se rendre intelligibles les +situations aux uns et aux autres. -Insistons : le facteur humain n’est pas l’entourage sensible d’un mécanisme réglé, il en est la pierre de touche. La scène existe tant qu’une personne — avec sa langue, ses hésitations, ses contraintes de travail et de famille, ses peurs et parfois sa honte — peut effectivement franchir le seuil. C’est pourquoi la grammaire du différé n’est jamais uniforme : elle doit pouvoir varier sans se contredire, pour accueillir la diversité des situations sans verser dans l’arbitraire. Il peut falloir un interprète, un accompagnement, un aménagement d’horaires, un espace non intimidant, un droit à la reformulation, un temps de consultation, un dispositif d’écoute qui ne confonde pas maladresse et mauvaise foi. De sorte qu’on n’égalise pas les chances par proclamation, mais par fabrication minutieuse d’un temps juste et adapté : assez long pour permettre l’expression pleine et entière, assez bref pour que la vie ne se défasse pas dans l’attente. +Insistons : le facteur humain n'est pas l'entourage sensible d'un +mécanisme réglé, il en est la pierre de touche. La scène existe tant +qu'une personne — avec sa langue, ses hésitations, ses contraintes de +travail et de famille, ses peurs et parfois sa honte — peut +effectivement franchir le seuil. C'est pourquoi la grammaire du différé +n'est jamais uniforme : elle doit pouvoir varier sans se contredire, +pour accueillir la diversité des situations sans verser dans +l'arbitraire. Il peut falloir un interprète, un accompagnement, un +aménagement d'horaires, un espace non intimidant, un droit à la +reformulation, un temps de consultation, un dispositif d'écoute qui ne +confonde pas maladresse et mauvaise foi. De sorte qu'on n'égalise pas +les chances par proclamation, mais par fabrication minutieuse d'un temps +juste et adapté : assez long pour permettre l'expression pleine et +entière, assez bref pour que la vie ne se défasse pas dans l'attente. -Cette grammaire — *scène, seuil, temporalité* — est proposée comme une manière de voir avant d’être une manière de faire. Elle s’enracine dans une évidence sans emphase : les collectifs humains, à travers des mondes et des époques hétérogènes, ont apprivoisé le conflit, la faute, la perte et l’aléa en travaillant le temps. On veillait, on délibérait, on se taisait, puis l’on revenait : autant de séquences réglées où chacun pouvait apparaître devant l’autre et où l’ordre commun se recomposait. Nos sociétés n’ont pas renoncé à ces arts du temps ; elles en ont déplacé l’exercice vers des interfaces et des scripts qui, croyant gagner en neutralité et en vélocité, perdent souvent en habitabilité. Dire la centralité du différé ne relève ici ni de la nostalgie ni de la morale ; c’est formuler une hypothèse d’intelligibilité : la parole ne tient qu’à la condition d’un temps qui la porte. +Cette grammaire — *scène, seuil, temporalité* — est proposée comme +une manière de voir avant d'être une manière de faire. Elle s'enracine +dans une évidence sans emphase : les collectifs humains, à travers des +mondes et des époques hétérogènes, ont apprivoisé le conflit, la faute, +la perte et l'aléa en travaillant le temps. On veillait, on délibérait, +on se taisait, puis l'on revenait : autant de séquences réglées où +chacun pouvait apparaître devant l'autre et où l'ordre commun se +recomposait. Nos sociétés n'ont pas renoncé à ces arts du temps ; elles +en ont déplacé l'exercice vers des interfaces et des scripts qui, +croyant gagner en neutralité et en vélocité, perdent souvent en +habitabilité. Dire la centralité du différé ne relève ici ni de la +nostalgie ni de la morale ; c'est formuler une hypothèse +d'intelligibilité : la parole ne tient qu'à la condition d'un temps qui +la porte. -L’objection est connue : la scène ralentit, le seuil complique, la temporalité coûte. À l’échelle des jours et des budgets, l’argument se défend. Mais l’observation comparée révèle une autre économie, moins comptable et plus politique : là où les dispositifs suppriment les moments d’exposition, la défiance s’accumule, les contournements émergent, les contentieux s’installent. À l’inverse, lorsque existent des formes minimales de scène — la possibilité de paraître quelque part, d’interrompre les effets le temps d’examiner, de revenir sur une décision, de comprendre ce qui l’a motivée, d’en garder mémoire pour apprendre —, les décisions se laissent mieux comprendre, se contestent moins longtemps, se réparent plus vite. Rien ici n’édicte une règle d’action : il s’agit d’indiquer un angle de lecture où la lenteur sélective apparaît non comme l’adversaire de l’efficacité, mais comme sa condition de justesse. +L'objection est connue : la scène ralentit, le seuil complique, la +temporalité coûte. À l'échelle des jours et des budgets, l'argument se +défend. Mais l'observation comparée révèle une autre économie, moins +comptable et plus politique : là où les dispositifs suppriment les +moments d'exposition, la défiance s'accumule, les contournements +émergent, les contentieux s'installent. À l'inverse, lorsque existent +des formes minimales de scène — la possibilité de paraître quelque +part, d'interrompre les effets le temps d'examiner, de revenir sur une +décision, de comprendre ce qui l'a motivée, d'en garder mémoire pour +apprendre —, les décisions se laissent mieux comprendre, se contestent +moins longtemps, se réparent plus vite. Rien ici n'édicte une règle +d'action : il s'agit d'indiquer un angle de lecture où la lenteur +sélective apparaît non comme l'adversaire de l'efficacité, mais comme sa +condition de justesse. -Ce que nous appelons grammaire des différés n’est ni un modèle unique ni une consigne. Elle se compose selon des lignes d’attention qui se croisent et se répondent : la *comparution*, d’abord, c’est-à-dire l’existence d’un lieu et d’une adresse où l’on peut apparaître ; la *suspension*, ensuite, cette possibilité temporaire d’arrêter les effets pour rouvrir l’examen ; puis la *réversibilité*, qui donne à l’erreur le droit d’être corrigée ; la *publicité* encore, qui rend visibles, à proportion juste, les critères et les voies ; enfin la *mémoire*, qui tient les traces non pour épier mais pour comprendre et se corriger. Ce qui importe est la tenue d’ensemble : que l’annonce n’usurpe pas l’accès, que l’avis n’emprunte pas le nom de l’écoute, que la visibilité ne se confonde pas avec l’exposition, que la trace ne dégénère pas en surveillance, que l’horodatage ne tienne pas lieu de temps partagé, que l’enregistrement ne se prenne pas pour mémoire. +Ce que nous appelons grammaire des différés n'est ni un modèle unique ni +une consigne. Elle se compose selon des lignes d'attention qui se +croisent et se répondent : la *comparution*, d'abord, c'est-à-dire +l'existence d'un lieu et d'une adresse où l'on peut apparaître ; la +*suspension*, ensuite, cette possibilité temporaire d'arrêter les effets +pour rouvrir l'examen ; puis la *réversibilité*, qui donne à l'erreur le +droit d'être corrigée ; la *publicité* encore, qui rend visibles, à +proportion juste, les critères et les voies ; enfin la *mémoire*, qui +tient les traces non pour épier mais pour comprendre et se corriger. Ce +qui importe est la tenue d'ensemble : que l'annonce n'usurpe pas +l'accès, que l'avis n'emprunte pas le nom de l'écoute, que la visibilité +ne se confonde pas avec l'exposition, que la trace ne dégénère pas en +surveillance, que l'horodatage ne tienne pas lieu de temps partagé, que +l'enregistrement ne se prenne pas pour mémoire. -De là découle une éthique de la forme qui éprouve. Une procédure peut bien exister sans produire une scène ; un recours peut figurer dans une brochure sans que le seuil soit franchissable ; des logs peuvent s’accumuler sans qu’une mémoire devienne intelligible. L’effectivité n’est pas un décret : elle se laisse repérer quand des vies parviennent à parler, quand certaines décisions se dédisent, quand des institutions endurent ce qu’elles n’avaient pas prévu d’entendre. Le temps accordé ne vaut pas pour différer indéfiniment ; il vaut pour laisser affleurer cette part de réel que l’urgence exclut d’ordinaire. Ce temps ne se réduit pas à celui des audiences et des rapports ; il inclut le temps discret des apprentissages croisés, lorsque les personnes apprennent les règles et que les institutions apprennent des personnes, lorsque la société, pour un instant, apprend de ce qu’elle a osé mettre en scène. +De là découle une éthique de la forme qui éprouve. Une procédure peut +bien exister sans produire une scène ; un recours peut figurer dans une +brochure sans que le seuil soit franchissable ; des logs peuvent +s'accumuler sans qu'une mémoire devienne intelligible. L'effectivité +n'est pas un décret : elle se laisse repérer quand des vies parviennent +à parler, quand certaines décisions se dédisent, quand des institutions +endurent ce qu'elles n'avaient pas prévu d'entendre. Le temps accordé ne +vaut pas pour différer indéfiniment ; il vaut pour laisser affleurer +cette part de réel que l'urgence exclut d'ordinaire. Ce temps ne se +réduit pas à celui des audiences et des rapports ; il inclut le temps +discret des apprentissages croisés, lorsque les personnes apprennent les +règles et que les institutions apprennent des personnes, lorsque la +société, pour un instant, apprend de ce qu'elle a osé mettre en scène. -Ainsi comprise, la portée politique des différés archicratiques tient dans un verbe simple : accueillir. Accueillir la parole vulnérable sans humilier l’autorité ; accueillir la correction sans ruiner l’action ; accueillir la mémoire sans geler le présent. On n’invente pas un monde vivable en accélérant tout, mais en distribuant des rythmes compatibles avec la dignité de celles et ceux qui sont régulés et la responsabilité de celles et ceux qui décident. La scène est le lieu de cette distribution, le seuil en règle l’accès, la temporalité en ajuste l’équité. Le reste — indices, méthodes, comparaisons — pourra venir utilement après coup, pourvu que demeure d’abord cette évidence de lecture : une régulation qui ne s’expose pas au temps finit par ne plus porter personne. +Ainsi comprise, la portée politique des différés archicratiques tient +dans un verbe simple : accueillir. Accueillir la parole vulnérable sans +humilier l'autorité ; accueillir la correction sans ruiner l'action ; +accueillir la mémoire sans geler le présent. On n'invente pas un monde +vivable en accélérant tout, mais en distribuant des rythmes compatibles +avec la dignité de celles et ceux qui sont régulés et la responsabilité +de celles et ceux qui décident. La scène est le lieu de cette +distribution, le seuil en règle l'accès, la temporalité en ajuste +l'équité. Le reste — indices, méthodes, comparaisons — pourra venir +utilement après coup, pourvu que demeure d'abord cette évidence de +lecture : une régulation qui ne s'expose pas au temps finit par ne plus +porter personne. -De ce point de vue, l’archicration n’est pas un protocole à décliner, mais un principe d’intelligibilité : elle nomme la respiration par laquelle un collectif, une société, une institution, une entreprise se rend à nouveau audible à lui-même. Lorsqu’un dispositif se laisse raconter, lorsqu’une décision accepte de se réexaminer, lorsqu’un fondement redevient discours, quelque chose comme de la politique reparaît — non pas la politique du commandement, mais celle qui consent à la scène. C’est à cette scène que l’hypothèse ici formulée convie : non pour ordonner, mais pour éclairer ; non pour prescrire, mais pour rendre possible un usage plus juste des mots qui nous régulent. +De ce point de vue, l'archicration n'est pas un protocole à décliner, +mais un principe d'intelligibilité : elle nomme la respiration par +laquelle un collectif, une société, une institution, une entreprise se +rend à nouveau audible à lui-même. Lorsqu'un dispositif se laisse +raconter, lorsqu'une décision accepte de se réexaminer, lorsqu'un +fondement redevient discours, quelque chose comme de la politique +reparaît — non pas la politique du commandement, mais celle qui +consent à la scène. C'est à cette scène que l'hypothèse ici formulée +convie : non pour ordonner, mais pour éclairer ; non pour prescrire, +mais pour rendre possible un usage plus juste des mots qui nous +régulent. ## **1.7 — Typologie stratifiée des *arcalités*, *cratialités* et *archicrations* : éléments pour une morphologie opérante** -À ce stade du chapitre, le paradigme archicratique s’est exposé dans ses principes, dans ses conditions de lisibilité, d’usage et d’épreuve, dans ses seuils critiques, ainsi que dans ses ancrages différés — scènes, seuils, temporalités. Mais il reste à en consolider la prise morphologique : non plus sous l’angle de ses conditions générales de possibilité, mais à travers l’analyse concrète de ses incarnations empiriques et de ses variations structurelles. Car une régulation ne se donne jamais dans le vide : elle se trame, se matérialise, se temporalise et s’éprouve. Le moment morphologique constitue ainsi le point de bascule entre la formulation du paradigme et sa puissance heuristique dans les régimes concrets. +À ce stade du chapitre, le paradigme archicratique s'est exposé dans ses +principes, dans ses conditions de lisibilité, d'usage et d'épreuve, dans +ses seuils critiques, ainsi que dans ses ancrages différés — scènes, +seuils, temporalités. Mais il reste à en consolider la prise +morphologique : non plus sous l'angle de ses conditions générales de +possibilité, mais à travers l'analyse concrète de ses incarnations +empiriques et de ses variations structurelles. Car une régulation ne se +donne jamais dans le vide : elle se trame, se matérialise, se +temporalise et s'éprouve. Le moment morphologique constitue ainsi le +point de bascule entre la formulation du paradigme et sa puissance +heuristique dans les régimes concrets. -Cette cartographie morphologique n’ouvre pas un second paradigme dans le paradigme : elle prolonge, sur le terrain des formes concrètes, les distinctions, les dynamiques et les repères déjà établis. +Cette cartographie morphologique n'ouvre pas un second paradigme dans le +paradigme : elle prolonge, sur le terrain des formes concrètes, les +distinctions, les dynamiques et les repères déjà établis. -Ce chantier ne répète pas ce qui a été posé jusqu’ici. Il s’en distingue par son objet, sa méthode et sa finalité. La section 1.1 posait le cadre d’intelligibilité général du paradigme : la triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration, pensée comme structure de fondation, de mise en œuvre et de reprise d’un ordre. La section 1.4 en déployait l’architecture théorique : triptyque de prises, logique de différenciation, schéma des articulations internes. Les sections 1.5 et 1.6 en ont ensuite éprouvé les formes dynamiques et dégagé les premiers repères heuristiques ; la section 1.7 en propose désormais la cartographie morphologique. +Ce chantier ne répète pas ce qui a été posé jusqu'ici. Il s'en distingue +par son objet, sa méthode et sa finalité. La section 1.1 posait le cadre +d'intelligibilité général du paradigme : la triade +arcalité–cratialité–archicration, pensée comme structure de fondation, +de mise en œuvre et de reprise d'un ordre. La section 1.4 en déployait +l'architecture théorique : triptyque de prises, logique de +différenciation, schéma des articulations internes. Les sections 1.5 et +1.6 en ont ensuite éprouvé les formes dynamiques et dégagé les premiers +repères heuristiques ; la section 1.7 en propose désormais la +cartographie morphologique. -Il s’agit désormais d’adopter une approche stratifiée, située, matérielle et expérientielle de ces trois prises, telles qu’elles apparaissent, circulent, se figent ou s’ouvrent dans les régimes de régulation réels — avec toute la diversité, la conflictualité, l’hétérogénéité et l’imperfection que cela suppose. Il ne s’agit donc plus de conceptualiser les pôles, mais d’en cartographier les formes. +Il s'agit désormais d'adopter une approche stratifiée, située, +matérielle et expérientielle de ces trois prises, telles qu'elles +apparaissent, circulent, se figent ou s'ouvrent dans les régimes de +régulation réels — avec toute la diversité, la conflictualité, +l'hétérogénéité et l'imperfection que cela suppose. Il ne s'agit donc +plus de conceptualiser les pôles, mais d'en cartographier les formes. -Car ce qui fait valeur dans un paradigme critique, ce n’est pas sa seule élégance morphologique, mais sa capacité à discerner des régularités, à documenter des bifurcations, à nommer des fractures — non pour assigner, mais pour ouvrir la possibilité d’une lecture située. Une forme d’*arcalité* n’est pas un idéal-type, mais une configuration référentielle historiquement, symboliquement et techniquement composée. Une *cratialité* ne vaut pas par sa fidélité à un protocole d’exécution, mais par l’agencement spécifique de ses opérateurs, de ses instruments, de ses temporalités d’action. Une *archicration* ne se mesure pas à l’existence nominale d’un droit au recours, mais à la consistance vécue de la scène qu’elle institue ou qu’elle empêche. C’est à ces formes multiples — *opérantes, affaiblies, désincarnées, empêchées, contournées* — que nous allons désormais nous confronter. +Car ce qui fait valeur dans un paradigme critique, ce n'est pas sa seule +élégance morphologique, mais sa capacité à discerner des régularités, à +documenter des bifurcations, à nommer des fractures — non pour +assigner, mais pour ouvrir la possibilité d'une lecture située. Une +forme d'*arcalité* n'est pas un idéal-type, mais une configuration +référentielle historiquement, symboliquement et techniquement composée. +Une *cratialité* ne vaut pas par sa fidélité à un protocole d'exécution, +mais par l'agencement spécifique de ses opérateurs, de ses instruments, +de ses temporalités d'action. Une *archicration* ne se mesure pas à +l'existence nominale d'un droit au recours, mais à la consistance vécue +de la scène qu'elle institue ou qu'elle empêche. C'est à ces formes +multiples — *opérantes, affaiblies, désincarnées, empêchées, +contournées* — que nous allons désormais nous confronter. -Ce travail de morphologie opérante repose sur trois exigences conjuguées. D’abord, une *exigence* *référentielle* : comprendre à partir de quels énoncés, objets, récits, modèles, figures ou principes un ordre prétend se légitimer. Ensuite, une *exigence opératoire* : analyser les mécanismes, supports, outils, interfaces, organigrammes, temporalités et frictions par lesquels une règle produit ses effets. Enfin, une *exigence expérientielle* : restituer la manière dont ces formes sont vécues, comprises, redoutées, contournées ou investies par celles et ceux qui y sont exposés. C’est dans cette articulation — du sémantique, du matériel et du sensible — que réside la puissance diagnostique du paradigme. +Ce travail de morphologie opérante repose sur trois exigences +conjuguées. D'abord, une *exigence* *référentielle* : comprendre à +partir de quels énoncés, objets, récits, modèles, figures ou principes +un ordre prétend se légitimer. Ensuite, une *exigence opératoire* : +analyser les mécanismes, supports, outils, interfaces, organigrammes, +temporalités et frictions par lesquels une règle produit ses effets. +Enfin, une *exigence expérientielle* : restituer la manière dont ces +formes sont vécues, comprises, redoutées, contournées ou investies par +celles et ceux qui y sont exposés. C'est dans cette articulation — du +sémantique, du matériel et du sensible — que réside la puissance +diagnostique du paradigme. -Mais il nous faut aller plus loin encore, car cette typologie stratifiée ne peut se limiter à un inventaire. Elle constitue davantage le socle critique de l’épreuve archicratique. En effet, une arcalité peut subsister en demeurant difficilement compréhensible ou contestable ; une cratialité peut opérer tout en restant peu localisable ou faiblement amendable ; une archicration peut être instituée tout en devenant pratiquement impraticable. Le paradigme archicratique n’exige pas que ces prises soient parfaites — il exige qu’elles soient rendues lisibles dans leur état, qu’elles soient exposées dans leur morphologie effective, et surtout qu’elles soient analysées pour ce qu’elles permettent ou empêchent en termes d’adresse, de comparution et de remédiation. +Mais il nous faut aller plus loin encore, car cette typologie stratifiée +ne peut se limiter à un inventaire. Elle constitue davantage le socle +critique de l'épreuve archicratique. En effet, une arcalité peut +subsister en demeurant difficilement compréhensible ou contestable ; une +cratialité peut opérer tout en restant peu localisable ou faiblement +amendable ; une archicration peut être instituée tout en devenant +pratiquement impraticable. Le paradigme archicratique n'exige pas que +ces prises soient parfaites — il exige qu'elles soient rendues +lisibles dans leur état, qu'elles soient exposées dans leur morphologie +effective, et surtout qu'elles soient analysées pour ce qu'elles +permettent ou empêchent en termes d'adresse, de comparution et de +remédiation. -Il s’agit ici d’un pas décisif vers l’observation située, vers la formalisation graduée des régimes, vers une grammaire analytique capable de faire apparaître les formes ténues ou massives, explicites ou latentes, ouvertes ou fermées, des prises archicratiques. C’est un appel à regarder autrement ce qui fait régulation. Et cet appel passe par la reconnaissance des formes — même mutilées, même silencieuses — que prennent nos fondements, nos opérations et nos scènes. +Il s'agit ici d'un pas décisif vers l'observation située, vers la +formalisation graduée des régimes, vers une grammaire analytique capable +de faire apparaître les formes ténues ou massives, explicites ou +latentes, ouvertes ou fermées, des prises archicratiques. C'est un appel +à regarder autrement ce qui fait régulation. Et cet appel passe par la +reconnaissance des formes — même mutilées, même silencieuses — que +prennent nos fondements, nos opérations et nos scènes. -### 1.7.1 — Les *formes d’arcalité* : référents qui s’exposent, qui se détiennent, qui s’incorporent +### 1.7.1 — Les *formes d'arcalité* : référents qui s'exposent, qui se détiennent, qui s'incorporent -Il n’est pas de régulation sans fondement : aucune norme ne dure, aucune contrainte ne s’impose, aucune décision ne prétend valoir sans s’adosser à une référence qui l’autorise. Cette *référence* — explicite ou implicite, proclamée ou latente, instituée ou héritée — constitue, lorsqu’elle affecte un ordre par sa puissance de légitimation, une forme d’*arcalité.* Celle-ci n’active rien par elle-même : elle n’opère pas, elle n’exécute pas — elle autorise. Ce référent, lorsqu’il est mobilisé pour fonder, justifier ou autoriser l’agir régulateur, constitue ce que nous nommons une *arcalité*. Il ne s’agit pas d’un principe abstrait suspendu dans l’éther normatif, mais d’un point d’ancrage situé, souvent composite, toujours situé, par lequel un ordre prétend valoir, être entendu, ou ne pas avoir à se justifier. L’*arcalité* n’est pas ce qui active ni ce qui décide ; elle n’effectue rien. Elle affecte un ordre en lui conférant sa prétention à la légitimité. Elle désigne la provenance d’autorité à partir de laquelle une régulation peut se prévaloir d’un socle — narratif, juridique, algorithmique, technique, moral, économique — qui en conditionne la recevabilité ou en interdit l’interpellation. +Il n'est pas de régulation sans fondement : aucune norme ne dure, aucune +contrainte ne s'impose, aucune décision ne prétend valoir sans s'adosser +à une référence qui l'autorise. Cette *référence* — explicite ou +implicite, proclamée ou latente, instituée ou héritée — constitue, +lorsqu'elle affecte un ordre par sa puissance de légitimation, une forme +d'*arcalité.* Celle-ci n'active rien par elle-même : elle n'opère pas, +elle n'exécute pas — elle autorise. Ce référent, lorsqu'il est +mobilisé pour fonder, justifier ou autoriser l'agir régulateur, +constitue ce que nous nommons une *arcalité*. Il ne s'agit pas d'un +principe abstrait suspendu dans l'éther normatif, mais d'un point +d'ancrage situé, souvent composite, toujours situé, par lequel un ordre +prétend valoir, être entendu, ou ne pas avoir à se justifier. +L'*arcalité* n'est pas ce qui active ni ce qui décide ; elle n'effectue +rien. Elle affecte un ordre en lui conférant sa prétention à la +légitimité. Elle désigne la provenance d'autorité à partir de laquelle +une régulation peut se prévaloir d'un socle — narratif, juridique, +algorithmique, technique, moral, économique — qui en conditionne la +recevabilité ou en interdit l'interpellation. -Les *arcalités* n’émergent pas du vide : elles s’inscrivent dans des matériaux hétérogènes, médiatisés par des supports, relayés par des institutions, transmis par des formes. Leur morphologie est stratifiée : un même dispositif peut juxtaposer ou hybrider plusieurs formes arcales — une loi de cadrage, un modèle algorithmique, une doctrine d’État, un récit d’origine, un ensemble de valeurs implicites. Ce sont ces formes d’affectation, pas forcément proclamée, que la présente sous-section entend déployer : non pas tant ce que disent les institutions qu’à partir de quoi elles parlent, à quoi elles se réfèrent, ce qu’elles mobilisent pour affecter symboliquement, juridiquement, politiquement un espace social donné. +Les *arcalités* n'émergent pas du vide : elles s'inscrivent dans des +matériaux hétérogènes, médiatisés par des supports, relayés par des +institutions, transmis par des formes. Leur morphologie est stratifiée : +un même dispositif peut juxtaposer ou hybrider plusieurs formes arcales — une loi de cadrage, un modèle algorithmique, une doctrine d'État, un +récit d'origine, un ensemble de valeurs implicites. Ce sont ces formes +d'affectation, pas forcément proclamée, que la présente sous-section +entend déployer : non pas tant ce que disent les institutions qu'à +partir de quoi elles parlent, à quoi elles se réfèrent, ce qu'elles +mobilisent pour affecter symboliquement, juridiquement, politiquement un +espace social donné. -Une *arcalité* peut être visible ou latente, stable ou flottante, énoncée ou implicite. Elle peut se donner dans le texte, dans le chiffre, dans l’image, dans le logo ou dans la coutume. Elle peut se transmettre comme nom, comme mémoire, comme code, comme indice ou comme titre. Elle peut être autoritaire sans être formelle, implicite sans être invisible, incorporée sans être consciente. Ce qui importe, pour la reconnaissance archicratique d’une *arcalité*, n’est pas son mode d’apparition, mais son effet d’autorité. Ce n’est pas qu’elle soit publique ou explicite, mais qu’elle opère, à un moment donné, comme source indiscutée ou discutable de justification, de légitimation ou de régulation. +Une *arcalité* peut être visible ou latente, stable ou flottante, +énoncée ou implicite. Elle peut se donner dans le texte, dans le +chiffre, dans l'image, dans le logo ou dans la coutume. Elle peut se +transmettre comme nom, comme mémoire, comme code, comme indice ou comme +titre. Elle peut être autoritaire sans être formelle, implicite sans +être invisible, incorporée sans être consciente. Ce qui importe, pour la +reconnaissance archicratique d'une *arcalité*, n'est pas son mode +d'apparition, mais son effet d'autorité. Ce n'est pas qu'elle soit +publique ou explicite, mais qu'elle opère, à un moment donné, comme +source indiscutée ou discutable de justification, de légitimation ou de +régulation. -Prenons un exemple simple : un dispositif d’allocation d’aide sociale adossé à un algorithme. Ce dernier ne se contente pas d’ordonner les priorités : il mobilise un ensemble de variables, de pondérations, de seuils qui, pour fonctionner, présupposent un régime d’*arcalité technique* — l’algorithme est *tenu* pour juste, pertinent, valide. Mais ce régime d’*arcalité* peut être soutenu par d’autres couches : une loi qui en prescrit l’usage, une autorité administrative qui le certifie, un modèle moral implicite qui justifie le tri (mérite, besoin, comportement antérieur). L’*arcalité* ici est plurielle, emboîtée, hiérarchisée parfois — et pourtant, elle ne parle pas. Elle fait valoir sans paraître. C’est pourquoi, dans une perspective morphologique, ce n’est pas l’origine proclamée du fondement qui importe, mais la manière dont il affecte l’ordre du pensable, du dicible, de l’autorité. +Prenons un exemple simple : un dispositif d'allocation d'aide sociale +adossé à un algorithme. Ce dernier ne se contente pas d'ordonner les +priorités : il mobilise un ensemble de variables, de pondérations, de +seuils qui, pour fonctionner, présupposent un régime d'*arcalité +technique* — l'algorithme est *tenu* pour juste, pertinent, valide. +Mais ce régime d'*arcalité* peut être soutenu par d'autres couches : une +loi qui en prescrit l'usage, une autorité administrative qui le +certifie, un modèle moral implicite qui justifie le tri (mérite, besoin, +comportement antérieur). L'*arcalité* ici est plurielle, emboîtée, +hiérarchisée parfois — et pourtant, elle ne parle pas. Elle fait +valoir sans paraître. C'est pourquoi, dans une perspective +morphologique, ce n'est pas l'origine proclamée du fondement qui +importe, mais la manière dont il affecte l'ordre du pensable, du +dicible, de l'autorité. -L’analyse archicratique des *arcalités* implique alors de prendre au sérieux cette plurivocité de la référence. Une norme peut être invoquée sans être nommée, une autorité peut se manifester sans s’énoncer, une source peut faire autorité sans être identifiée. C’est pourquoi il faut, méthodologiquement, toujours rechercher les indices d’*arcalité* dans les formes d’énonciation, les dispositifs de justification, les documents d’accompagnement, mais aussi dans les comportements institutionnels, les stratégies d’invocation ou d’évitement, les seuils symboliques de légitimité. Une signature, un tampon, un logo officiel, une jurisprudence, un numéro de version ou un copyright peuvent, dans certaines configurations, valoir *arcalité*. +L'analyse archicratique des *arcalités* implique alors de prendre au +sérieux cette plurivocité de la référence. Une norme peut être invoquée +sans être nommée, une autorité peut se manifester sans s'énoncer, une +source peut faire autorité sans être identifiée. C'est pourquoi il faut, +méthodologiquement, toujours rechercher les indices d'*arcalité* dans +les formes d'énonciation, les dispositifs de justification, les +documents d'accompagnement, mais aussi dans les comportements +institutionnels, les stratégies d'invocation ou d'évitement, les seuils +symboliques de légitimité. Une signature, un tampon, un logo officiel, +une jurisprudence, un numéro de version ou un copyright peuvent, dans +certaines configurations, valoir *arcalité*. -Mais une *arcalité* se juge aussi à sa tenue. C’est ici que commence l’examen critique : non pour décréter la validité d’un fondement, mais pour observer comment il s’installe, se maintient, se transforme, se dispute ou se verrouille. L’*arcalité* peut être claire, accessible, opposable, révisable : c’est le cas, par exemple, d’une norme publiée dans un code annoté, commentée par la doctrine, citée dans des jurisprudences, ouverte à des révisions périodiques. Mais elle peut être également obscure, non datée, protégée par le secret industriel, rédigée dans un langage inintelligible pour les non-initiés — auquel cas, sa forme n’est pas moins opérante, mais elle produit un autre régime, celui du fondement sans adresse. +Mais une *arcalité* se juge aussi à sa tenue. C'est ici que commence +l'examen critique : non pour décréter la validité d'un fondement, mais +pour observer comment il s'installe, se maintient, se transforme, se +dispute ou se verrouille. L'*arcalité* peut être claire, accessible, +opposable, révisable : c'est le cas, par exemple, d'une norme publiée +dans un code annoté, commentée par la doctrine, citée dans des +jurisprudences, ouverte à des révisions périodiques. Mais elle peut être +également obscure, non datée, protégée par le secret industriel, rédigée +dans un langage inintelligible pour les non-initiés — auquel cas, sa +forme n'est pas moins opérante, mais elle produit un autre régime, celui +du fondement sans adresse. -Dans tous les cas, ce qui est en jeu, ce n’est pas tant la conformité à une norme d’accessibilité, que la possibilité pour les sujets régulés d’identifier, de citer, de remettre en jeu cette *arcalité*. Une référence qui ne se donne ni à lire ni à discuter, qui ne se laisse pas désigner, qui ne supporte aucune contradiction, n’appartient pas nécessairement au dehors de la régulation archicratique, mais signale un régime déficient ou fermé de fondement. Elle opère sans pouvoir être interrogée — c’est-à-dire qu’elle cesse d’être *arcalité ouverte* pour devenir *arcalité close*, forme d’invocation figée, souvent adossée à une forme d’autorité auto-référentielle (l’expert, le système, le chiffre, l’algorithme, la tradition, le titre, etc.). +Dans tous les cas, ce qui est en jeu, ce n'est pas tant la conformité à +une norme d'accessibilité, que la possibilité pour les sujets régulés +d'identifier, de citer, de remettre en jeu cette *arcalité*. Une +référence qui ne se donne ni à lire ni à discuter, qui ne se laisse pas +désigner, qui ne supporte aucune contradiction, n'appartient pas +nécessairement au dehors de la régulation archicratique, mais signale un +régime déficient ou fermé de fondement. Elle opère sans pouvoir être +interrogée — c'est-à-dire qu'elle cesse d'être *arcalité ouverte* pour +devenir *arcalité close*, forme d'invocation figée, souvent adossée à +une forme d'autorité auto-référentielle (l'expert, le système, le +chiffre, l'algorithme, la tradition, le titre, etc.). -Ce sont ces formes différenciées que nous devons nous attacher à circonscrire en montrant, de manière située, comment une *arcalité* peut se composer, se matérialiser, s’incorporer, se transmettre ou se verrouiller — et comment elle affecte, ce faisant, les conditions mêmes de la régulation. +Ce sont ces formes différenciées que nous devons nous attacher à +circonscrire en montrant, de manière située, comment une *arcalité* peut +se composer, se matérialiser, s'incorporer, se transmettre ou se +verrouiller — et comment elle affecte, ce faisant, les conditions +mêmes de la régulation. -Une *arcalité* peut d’abord s’incorporer sans jamais se déclarer. C’est le cas des *formes implicites* de légitimation sociale, fondées sur des appartenances présumées ou des qualifications héritées, qui autorisent certains à parler, à décider, à agir sans avoir à exposer leur titre. Le port d’un uniforme, la détention d’un diplôme, l’appartenance à un corps ou à une lignée peuvent produire une *arcalité incarnée*, non discursive, mais opérante. Cette incorporation rend l’autorité indiscutable précisément parce qu’elle se donne à voir, à se reconnaître et à s’intérioriser. +Une *arcalité* peut d'abord s'incorporer sans jamais se déclarer. C'est +le cas des *formes implicites* de légitimation sociale, fondées sur des +appartenances présumées ou des qualifications héritées, qui autorisent +certains à parler, à décider, à agir sans avoir à exposer leur titre. Le +port d'un uniforme, la détention d'un diplôme, l'appartenance à un corps +ou à une lignée peuvent produire une *arcalité incarnée*, non +discursive, mais opérante. Cette incorporation rend l'autorité +indiscutable précisément parce qu'elle se donne à voir, à se reconnaître +et à s'intérioriser. -Elle se manifeste dans les signes : une posture, une voix, une manière de trancher ou de présider. On ne demande pas pourquoi, parce que l’apparence suffit : elle est l’*autorité*. Ce n’est pas une scène, mais une *évidence incorporée*, un *effet d’intériorisation silencieuse*. Dans ces cas, la critique est rendue difficile, non par la force du fondement, mais par sa naturalisation : nul ne le revendique, nul ne l’explique, nul ne sait même s’il pourrait en douter. L’*arcalité* est ainsi dissoute dans les corps et les signes. +Elle se manifeste dans les signes : une posture, une voix, une manière +de trancher ou de présider. On ne demande pas pourquoi, parce que +l'apparence suffit : elle est l'*autorité*. Ce n'est pas une scène, mais +une *évidence incorporée*, un *effet d'intériorisation silencieuse*. +Dans ces cas, la critique est rendue difficile, non par la force du +fondement, mais par sa naturalisation : nul ne le revendique, nul ne +l'explique, nul ne sait même s'il pourrait en douter. L'*arcalité* est +ainsi dissoute dans les corps et les signes. -Viennent ensuite les *formes hybrides*, dans lesquelles plusieurs sources sont mobilisées simultanément pour asseoir une autorité : une règle est invoquée au nom d’un texte, mais aussi d’une valeur morale, d’une exigence technique, d’une urgence circonstancielle. Ces configurations composites sont fréquentes dans les régimes contemporains, où les justifications doivent répondre à des injonctions multiples : juridique, médiatique, experte, éthique, financière. L’exemple du Concordat de 1801 en France montre bien cette hybridité : le régime napoléonien y a combiné autorité politique, reconnaissance d’un culte, doctrine morale publique et contrôle administratif des nominations. L’*arcalité* y est composite : elle s’appuie sur une rationalité d’État, une autorité religieuse partiellement sécularisée, une doctrine nationale et une effictivité administrative. +Viennent ensuite les *formes hybrides*, dans lesquelles plusieurs +sources sont mobilisées simultanément pour asseoir une autorité : une +règle est invoquée au nom d'un texte, mais aussi d'une valeur morale, +d'une exigence technique, d'une urgence circonstancielle. Ces +configurations composites sont fréquentes dans les régimes +contemporains, où les justifications doivent répondre à des injonctions +multiples : juridique, médiatique, experte, éthique, financière. +L'exemple du Concordat de 1801 en France montre bien cette hybridité : +le régime napoléonien y a combiné autorité politique, reconnaissance +d'un culte, doctrine morale publique et contrôle administratif des +nominations. L'*arcalité* y est composite : elle s'appuie sur une +rationalité d'État, une autorité religieuse partiellement sécularisée, +une doctrine nationale et une effictivité administrative. -Un autre exemple générique peut prendre corps dans un plan de réforme invoquant l’équité sociale, la soutenabilité budgétaire, la conformité réglementaire, la validation algorithmique et l’adhésion populaire. Cette polyphonie peut être une richesse — si elle permet la pluralisation des points de vue — mais elle peut aussi servir de paravent stratégique : aucune autorité n’étant pleinement assumée, toutes se renvoient la balle. Dans ce cas, la pluralité devient opacité. On ne sait plus d’où vient la primauté de l’ordre : de la loi, de la technique, du marché, du consensus ou de l’expert. L’*arcalité* se brouille dans le maquis des justifications concurrentes, dans une chaîne de responsabilités diluées. +Un autre exemple générique peut prendre corps dans un plan de réforme +invoquant l'équité sociale, la soutenabilité budgétaire, la conformité +réglementaire, la validation algorithmique et l'adhésion populaire. +Cette polyphonie peut être une richesse — si elle permet la +pluralisation des points de vue — mais elle peut aussi servir de +paravent stratégique : aucune autorité n'étant pleinement assumée, +toutes se renvoient la balle. Dans ce cas, la pluralité devient opacité. +On ne sait plus d'où vient la primauté de l'ordre : de la loi, de la +technique, du marché, du consensus ou de l'expert. L'*arcalité* se +brouille dans le maquis des justifications concurrentes, dans une chaîne +de responsabilités diluées. -Les *formes stratifiées* d’*arcalité* désignent quant à elles des configurations historiques dans lesquelles plusieurs couches de légitimation coexistent sans nécessairement se superposer de manière cohérente. C’est le cas, par exemple, des anciennes colonies administrées encore partiellement par des textes hérités de l’époque coloniale, combinés à des normes constitutionnelles récentes, à des régulations internationales et à des codes coutumiers reconnus localement. +Les *formes stratifiées* d'*arcalité* désignent quant à elles des +configurations historiques dans lesquelles plusieurs couches de +légitimation coexistent sans nécessairement se superposer de manière +cohérente. C'est le cas, par exemple, des anciennes colonies +administrées encore partiellement par des textes hérités de l'époque +coloniale, combinés à des normes constitutionnelles récentes, à des +régulations internationales et à des codes coutumiers reconnus +localement. -Ici, la source d’autorité est plurielle, non seulement en termes de nature, mais aussi de temporalité. La référence devient mouvante, multiple, différée selon les contextes. La régulation s’y fragilise : on peut toujours justifier une décision en mobilisant la strate qui la permet, sans que cette justification soit nécessairement opposable ou lisible. On peut toujours justifier une décision en choisissant la strate qui l’autorise. Le droit devient un millefeuille, l’*arcalité* un labyrinthe à plusieurs échelles. Il n’y a pas d’illégalité explicite, mais une incertitude de fondement. L’ordre tient sans tenir : chaque geste peut être justifié a posteriori, sans pour autant que la justification ne soit discutable. +Ici, la source d'autorité est plurielle, non seulement en termes de +nature, mais aussi de temporalité. La référence devient mouvante, +multiple, différée selon les contextes. La régulation s'y fragilise : on +peut toujours justifier une décision en mobilisant la strate qui la +permet, sans que cette justification soit nécessairement opposable ou +lisible. On peut toujours justifier une décision en choisissant la +strate qui l'autorise. Le droit devient un millefeuille, l'*arcalité* un +labyrinthe à plusieurs échelles. Il n'y a pas d'illégalité explicite, +mais une incertitude de fondement. L'ordre tient sans tenir : chaque +geste peut être justifié a posteriori, sans pour autant que la +justification ne soit discutable. -D’autres sont des *formes* *latentes* : elles n’apparaissent qu’en cas de crise, de contentieux, de demande explicite de justification. Une autorité ne se montre pas, tant qu’on ne lui demande pas de parler. Ce sont les formes dormantes de l’*arcalité*, celles qui ne s’activent qu’au moment de la dispute ou de la désobéissance. Une plateforme numérique, par exemple, qui suspend un compte sans préavis, peut ensuite invoquer une clause, un algorithme, une condition d’usage pour justifier rétroactivement son geste. L’*arcalité* était là — dans le code, dans les conditions générales, dans l’architecture technique — mais elle n’avait pas besoin de s’exprimer tant qu’elle n’était pas sollicitée ou appelée à l’être. +D'autres sont des *formes* *latentes* : elles n'apparaissent qu'en cas +de crise, de contentieux, de demande explicite de justification. Une +autorité ne se montre pas, tant qu'on ne lui demande pas de parler. Ce +sont les formes dormantes de l'*arcalité*, celles qui ne s'activent +qu'au moment de la dispute ou de la désobéissance. Une plateforme +numérique, par exemple, qui suspend un compte sans préavis, peut ensuite +invoquer une clause, un algorithme, une condition d'usage pour justifier +rétroactivement son geste. L'*arcalité* était là — dans le code, dans +les conditions générales, dans l'architecture technique — mais elle +n'avait pas besoin de s'exprimer tant qu'elle n'était pas sollicitée ou +appelée à l'être. -Une *arcalité* silencieuse peut demeurer opérante : elle fonde sans nécessairement apparaître. Mais ce silence a un coût, car il rend la référence indisponible, difficilement mobilisable, et donc peu propice à une régulation habitable. De plus son silence n’est pas neutre : il produit un régime de fondement fermé, difficilement invocable et donc difficilement contestable. C’est à ce titre qu’une analyse archicratique doit la repérer comme telle, non pour en nier l’existence, mais pour en révéler la forme — *fondement latent, incorporé* ou *verrouillé* — et en évaluer les effets sur la régulation. +Une *arcalité* silencieuse peut demeurer opérante : elle fonde sans +nécessairement apparaître. Mais ce silence a un coût, car il rend la +référence indisponible, difficilement mobilisable, et donc peu propice à +une régulation habitable. De plus son silence n'est pas neutre : il +produit un régime de fondement fermé, difficilement invocable et donc +difficilement contestable. C'est à ce titre qu'une analyse archicratique +doit la repérer comme telle, non pour en nier l'existence, mais pour en +révéler la forme — *fondement latent, incorporé* ou *verrouillé* — et en évaluer les effets sur la régulation. -Enfin, il faut nommer les *formes fragilisées*, celles où le fondement s’effrite, se délite, se contredit ou devient inaudible. Cela peut survenir dans des moments de *bascule politique* (lorsqu’un régime perd sa légitimité sans que d’autre vienne le remplacer), dans des *légitimations usées* (où les justifications se réduisent à des slogans vidés de sens), ou dans des *scènes saturées* (où la surenchère des références empêche toute reconnaissance commune). Une *arcalité fragilisée* se reconnaît souvent à la perte d’effet performatif de ses énoncés : la règle est dite, mais elle n’est plus entendue ; la valeur est affichée, mais elle ne touche plus ; la légitimité est proclamée, mais elle ne porte plus. Ce n’est pas qu’il n’y ait plus de principe, c’est qu’il ne convainc plus et n’engendre plus l’adhésion même implicite. Il y a disjonction entre l’énoncé et l’acte, entre l’autorité proclamée et la reconnaissance effective. +Enfin, il faut nommer les *formes fragilisées*, celles où le fondement +s'effrite, se délite, se contredit ou devient inaudible. Cela peut +survenir dans des moments de *bascule politique* (lorsqu'un régime perd +sa légitimité sans que d'autre vienne le remplacer), dans des +*légitimations usées* (où les justifications se réduisent à des slogans +vidés de sens), ou dans des *scènes saturées* (où la surenchère des +références empêche toute reconnaissance commune). Une *arcalité +fragilisée* se reconnaît souvent à la perte d'effet performatif de ses +énoncés : la règle est dite, mais elle n'est plus entendue ; la valeur +est affichée, mais elle ne touche plus ; la légitimité est proclamée, +mais elle ne porte plus. Ce n'est pas qu'il n'y ait plus de principe, +c'est qu'il ne convainc plus et n'engendre plus l'adhésion même +implicite. Il y a disjonction entre l'énoncé et l'acte, entre l'autorité +proclamée et la reconnaissance effective. -On ne mesure pas la valeur d’une *arcalité* à son degré de célébration ni à sa seule énonciation. Ce qui importe, dans une configuration archicratique, c’est la manière dont un référent se déploie dans un régime donné : s’il peut être reconnu, situé, cité, repris — et cela, sans préjuger de sa stabilité, de son autorité ou de son acceptabilité immédiate. +On ne mesure pas la valeur d'une *arcalité* à son degré de célébration +ni à sa seule énonciation. Ce qui importe, dans une configuration +archicratique, c'est la manière dont un référent se déploie dans un +régime donné : s'il peut être reconnu, situé, cité, repris — et cela, +sans préjuger de sa stabilité, de son autorité ou de son acceptabilité +immédiate. -Une *arcalité* peut être *implicite, incorporée, ritualisée*, sans qu’elle cesse pour autant d’agir comme fondement ; elle peut aussi être *explicite, affichée, documentée*, tout en demeurant inopérante si elle n’offre aucune prise sur la situation. Ce qui fait sa tenue, ce n’est ni son éclat symbolique, ni sa simplicité formelle, ni son prestige institutionnel, mais sa *capacité à organiser des régimes de référence dans lesquels un sujet situé peut comprendre ce qui est invoqué contre lui, ou pour lui, et sur quel fondement cela repose.* +Une *arcalité* peut être *implicite, incorporée, ritualisée*, sans +qu'elle cesse pour autant d'agir comme fondement ; elle peut aussi être +*explicite, affichée, documentée*, tout en demeurant inopérante si elle +n'offre aucune prise sur la situation. Ce qui fait sa tenue, ce n'est ni +son éclat symbolique, ni sa simplicité formelle, ni son prestige +institutionnel, mais sa *capacité à organiser des régimes de référence +dans lesquels un sujet situé peut comprendre ce qui est invoqué contre +lui, ou pour lui, et sur quel fondement cela repose.* -Cette capacité est une exigence politique minimale afin qu’il soit possible de faire retour sur ce qui autorise, de demander raison de ce qui se réclame d’un texte, d’un algorithme, d’un droit, d’un récit, d’un code, d’une compétence. Ce retour peut être différé, discret, symbolique ou explicite, mais il doit rester ouvert — ou à tout le moins localisable. Sans cette possibilité, ce n’est pas seulement le fondement qui s’éteint, c’est la régulation elle-même qui devient opaque, mécanique, invocable sans discussion, susceptible d’être reproduite sans être comprise. +Cette capacité est une exigence politique minimale afin qu'il soit +possible de faire retour sur ce qui autorise, de demander raison de ce +qui se réclame d'un texte, d'un algorithme, d'un droit, d'un récit, d'un +code, d'une compétence. Ce retour peut être différé, discret, symbolique +ou explicite, mais il doit rester ouvert — ou à tout le moins +localisable. Sans cette possibilité, ce n'est pas seulement le fondement +qui s'éteint, c'est la régulation elle-même qui devient opaque, +mécanique, invocable sans discussion, susceptible d'être reproduite sans +être comprise. -Il ne s’agit pas ici de faire l’éloge systématique de la controverse. Certaines *arcalités* peuvent opérer par stabilité, par clôture symbolique, par transmission silencieuse. Ce qui compte, c’est qu’elles laissent une mémoire et une adresse : que ce qui a été invoqué pour justifier une régulation puisse, un jour ou quelque part, être nommé, rapporté, situé, amendé. Ce qui fonde la véracité d’une *arcalité*, c’est la possibilité différée d’une interpellation située, quand bien même cette interpellation resterait exceptionnelle. +Il ne s'agit pas ici de faire l'éloge systématique de la controverse. +Certaines *arcalités* peuvent opérer par stabilité, par clôture +symbolique, par transmission silencieuse. Ce qui compte, c'est qu'elles +laissent une mémoire et une adresse : que ce qui a été invoqué pour +justifier une régulation puisse, un jour ou quelque part, être nommé, +rapporté, situé, amendé. Ce qui fonde la véracité d'une *arcalité*, +c'est la possibilité différée d'une interpellation située, quand bien +même cette interpellation resterait exceptionnelle. -En ce sens, *la vitalité des arcalités réside dans leur habitabilité différenciée* : dans leur aptitude à produire du sens commun, à organiser un horizon de compréhension et, si besoin, à se prêter à l’interprétation et à la révision sans se dissoudre. Le conflit n’est pas la condition de l’autorité, mais l’épreuve de sa tenue. Une régulation ne gagne pas à être perpétuellement contestée, mais elle devient dangereuse dès lors que son fondement cesse d’être adressable, nommable, interrogeable, dans un temps suspendu ou dans une langue partagée. +En ce sens, *la vitalité des arcalités réside dans leur habitabilité +différenciée* : dans leur aptitude à produire du sens commun, à +organiser un horizon de compréhension et, si besoin, à se prêter à +l'interprétation et à la révision sans se dissoudre. Le conflit n'est +pas la condition de l'autorité, mais l'épreuve de sa tenue. Une +régulation ne gagne pas à être perpétuellement contestée, mais elle +devient dangereuse dès lors que son fondement cesse d'être adressable, +nommable, interrogeable, dans un temps suspendu ou dans une langue +partagée. -Voilà pourquoi la *scène* n’est pas le lieu de l’*arcalité*, mais le test différé de sa consistance. Un fondement qui n’accepte jamais d’être rapporté, qui se dérobe à toute citation ou toute mise en récit, peut encore opérer — mais il le fait alors comme autorité close, quasi arbitraire, non comme référence reconnue et légitime. C’est là que se joue, en creux, la distinction entre *arcalité* et dogme, entre *source de régulation* et force sans fondement. +Voilà pourquoi la *scène* n'est pas le lieu de l'*arcalité*, mais le +test différé de sa consistance. Un fondement qui n'accepte jamais d'être +rapporté, qui se dérobe à toute citation ou toute mise en récit, peut +encore opérer — mais il le fait alors comme autorité close, quasi +arbitraire, non comme référence reconnue et légitime. C'est là que se +joue, en creux, la distinction entre *arcalité* et dogme, entre *source +de régulation* et force sans fondement. -Une *arcalité*, aussi tenue soit-elle, ne produit rien par elle-même. Elle doit être transmise, relayée, exécutée — autrement dit : insérée dans des chaînes d’action qui en déterminent la forme vécue. Ce n’est qu’en passant dans la *cratialité* que le fondement devient effet. Elle doit être transmise, articulée, opérée et agissante. Car l’*arcalité* appelle des gestes, des actions, des chaînes, des dispositifs. Ce n’est alors plus le principe ou la justification qui importe, mais ce qui le fait agir, ce qui en produit les effets, ce qui l’exécute, l’altère ou l’interprète dans l’épreuve des opérations. C’est à cette dynamique concrète que nous allons désormais nous confronter. +Une *arcalité*, aussi tenue soit-elle, ne produit rien par elle-même. +Elle doit être transmise, relayée, exécutée — autrement dit : insérée +dans des chaînes d'action qui en déterminent la forme vécue. Ce n'est +qu'en passant dans la *cratialité* que le fondement devient effet. Elle +doit être transmise, articulée, opérée et agissante. Car l'*arcalité* +appelle des gestes, des actions, des chaînes, des dispositifs. Ce n'est +alors plus le principe ou la justification qui importe, mais ce qui le +fait agir, ce qui en produit les effets, ce qui l'exécute, l'altère ou +l'interprète dans l'épreuve des opérations. C'est à cette dynamique +concrète que nous allons désormais nous confronter. ### **1.7.2 — Les *formes de cratialité* : gestes qui opèrent, chaînes qui articulent, agencements qui contraignent** -Si l’*arcalité* désigne ce qui fonde, légitime ou autorise un ordre — qu’il s’énonce explicitement ou qu’il agisse de manière incorporée ou silencieuse —, alors la *cratialité* en constitue la réalité opératoire. Ce n’est ni le moment de la décision ni le lieu du fondement : c’est la dynamique par laquelle un ordre institué agit effectivement, se déploie, s’ajuste, se répercute ou se distord à travers un ensemble d’opérations concrètes. Elle est la dimension performative de la régulation, non comme intention d’agir, mais comme effet produit dans un espace situé. +Si l'*arcalité* désigne ce qui fonde, légitime ou autorise un ordre — qu'il s'énonce explicitement ou qu'il agisse de manière incorporée ou +silencieuse —, alors la *cratialité* en constitue la réalité +opératoire. Ce n'est ni le moment de la décision ni le lieu du fondement +: c'est la dynamique par laquelle un ordre institué agit effectivement, +se déploie, s'ajuste, se répercute ou se distord à travers un ensemble +d'opérations concrètes. Elle est la dimension performative de la +régulation, non comme intention d'agir, mais comme effet produit dans un +espace situé. -Ce qui s’opère ici ne se réduit pas à l’exécution mécanique d’une norme. Il s’agit d’une articulation composite, faite de gestes matériels ou numériques, de relais humains ou non-humains, de dispositifs techniques, de temporalités différenciées, de scripts formalisés, de tolérances implicites, de seuils codés, d’interfaces visibles ou d’arrière-plans silencieux. Une *cratialité* ne tient ni dans la déclaration de la règle ni dans l’idéal de sa mise en œuvre, mais dans la *consistance réelle d’un agencement d’opérations effectives*. Et c’est là qu’elle se distingue fondamentalement de l’arcalité : une *cratialité* est une chaîne, une trame, une scénographie d’opérations situées, articulées, incarnées par des agents ou des opérateurs. +Ce qui s'opère ici ne se réduit pas à l'exécution mécanique d'une norme. +Il s'agit d'une articulation composite, faite de gestes matériels ou +numériques, de relais humains ou non-humains, de dispositifs techniques, +de temporalités différenciées, de scripts formalisés, de tolérances +implicites, de seuils codés, d'interfaces visibles ou d'arrière-plans +silencieux. Une *cratialité* ne tient ni dans la déclaration de la règle +ni dans l'idéal de sa mise en œuvre, mais dans la *consistance réelle +d'un agencement d'opérations effectives*. Et c'est là qu'elle se +distingue fondamentalement de l'arcalité : une *cratialité* est une +chaîne, une trame, une scénographie d'opérations situées, articulées, +incarnées par des agents ou des opérateurs. -Le *geste cratial* n’est pas nécessairement humain. Il peut s’incarner dans une ligne de code, dans un virement bancaire, dans une architecture réseau, dans une signalisation, dans un protocole, dans une latence calculée, dans une tolérance institutionnelle, dans un usage répété. En cela, la *cratialité* revêt de multiples forces dans divers lieux et divers temps. Ce qui fait *cratialité*, c’est surtout l’effet produit dans un régime soumis à régulation. Ce peut être le clic à vide qui bloque l’accès à un droit, la boucle algorithmique qui conditionne une orientation scolaire, la manivelle qui déclenche une alarme, la note administrative qui suspend une allocation, le formulaire qui exige une pièce impossible à fournir : tous ces gestes, dès lors qu’ils modulent l’état d’un sujet, configurent une *opération cratiale*. +Le *geste cratial* n'est pas nécessairement humain. Il peut s'incarner +dans une ligne de code, dans un virement bancaire, dans une architecture +réseau, dans une signalisation, dans un protocole, dans une latence +calculée, dans une tolérance institutionnelle, dans un usage répété. En +cela, la *cratialité* revêt de multiples forces dans divers lieux et +divers temps. Ce qui fait *cratialité*, c'est surtout l'effet produit +dans un régime soumis à régulation. Ce peut être le clic à vide qui +bloque l'accès à un droit, la boucle algorithmique qui conditionne une +orientation scolaire, la manivelle qui déclenche une alarme, la note +administrative qui suspend une allocation, le formulaire qui exige une +pièce impossible à fournir : tous ces gestes, dès lors qu'ils modulent +l'état d'un sujet, configurent une *opération cratiale*. -Elle peut se déployer dans des *régimes centralisés* — un portail numérique unique de déclaration sociale —, ou dans des *configurations décentralisées, voire distribuées* — comme les chaînes d’évaluation dans les démarches de reconnaissance professionnelle, qui multiplient les intermédiaires, les validations, les interprétations. Mais aussi dans un hôpital, lorsque le fait d’être soigné ne dépend pas exclusivement d’un médecin. Il traverse alors des scripts de tri, des routines de priorisation, des flux de traitement, des ajustements de disponibilité, des tolérances organisationnelles. Il en résulte un ordre d’accès composite, fait d’anticipations, de goulots d’étranglement, d’écarts tolérés, de raccourcis assumés — et c’est cette chaîne-là qui constitue la *cratialité* réelle de la régulation hospitalière. +Elle peut se déployer dans des *régimes centralisés* — un portail +numérique unique de déclaration sociale —, ou dans des *configurations +décentralisées, voire distribuées* — comme les chaînes d'évaluation +dans les démarches de reconnaissance professionnelle, qui multiplient +les intermédiaires, les validations, les interprétations. Mais aussi +dans un hôpital, lorsque le fait d'être soigné ne dépend pas +exclusivement d'un médecin. Il traverse alors des scripts de tri, des +routines de priorisation, des flux de traitement, des ajustements de +disponibilité, des tolérances organisationnelles. Il en résulte un ordre +d'accès composite, fait d'anticipations, de goulots d'étranglement, +d'écarts tolérés, de raccourcis assumés — et c'est cette chaîne-là qui +constitue la *cratialité* réelle de la régulation hospitalière. -Il faut ici récuser toute vision gestionnaire ou techniciste. La *cratialité* ne se résume pas à un processus d’optimisation. Elle n’a pas pour finalité d’assurer l’efficacité d’un dispositif, mais de rendre intelligible les formes d’effectuation concrète d’un ordre. Une chaîne de traitement peut être rapide, fluide, bien documentée — et pourtant rigide, incompréhensible, impitoyable. À l’inverse, une *cratialité* peut être lente, manuelle, fragmentée — mais ménager des seuils d’ajustement, des lieux d’appel, des moments d’interruption qui la rendent habitable. Ce n’est pas le style de l’opération qui compte, mais sa capacité à articuler des effets dans une configuration régulatrice spécifique. +Il faut ici récuser toute vision gestionnaire ou techniciste. La +*cratialité* ne se résume pas à un processus d'optimisation. Elle n'a +pas pour finalité d'assurer l'efficacité d'un dispositif, mais de rendre +intelligible les formes d'effectuation concrète d'un ordre. Une chaîne +de traitement peut être rapide, fluide, bien documentée — et pourtant +rigide, incompréhensible, impitoyable. À l'inverse, une *cratialité* +peut être lente, manuelle, fragmentée — mais ménager des seuils +d'ajustement, des lieux d'appel, des moments d'interruption qui la +rendent habitable. Ce n'est pas le style de l'opération qui compte, mais +sa capacité à articuler des effets dans une configuration régulatrice +spécifique. -Cette articulation engage la matérialité des infrastructures comme la plasticité des rôles. Un *geste cratial* est conditionné par une forme, un outil, une procédure, un délai, un seuil, un langage. Lorsqu’un distributeur automatique refuse un retrait parce que le compte est bloqué, il ne fait qu’opérer un effet déjà inscrit ailleurs dans une chaîne bancaire : encodage d’un score de risque, clôture discrète d’un accès, préemption sur des soldes en litige. Le geste, ici, est purement machinique, mais sa *cratialité* est pleine : il transforme une trajectoire, conditionne une action, produit un effet de contrainte — sur une justification faiblement visible et dans une scène d’épreuve neutralisée, reléguée ou pratiquement hors de portée. +Cette articulation engage la matérialité des infrastructures comme la +plasticité des rôles. Un *geste cratial* est conditionné par une forme, +un outil, une procédure, un délai, un seuil, un langage. Lorsqu'un +distributeur automatique refuse un retrait parce que le compte est +bloqué, il ne fait qu'opérer un effet déjà inscrit ailleurs dans une +chaîne bancaire : encodage d'un score de risque, clôture discrète d'un +accès, préemption sur des soldes en litige. Le geste, ici, est purement +machinique, mais sa *cratialité* est pleine : il transforme une +trajectoire, conditionne une action, produit un effet de contrainte — sur une justification faiblement visible et dans une scène d'épreuve +neutralisée, reléguée ou pratiquement hors de portée. -C’est précisément cette possibilité de neutralisation, de relocalisation ou d’inopérance de la scène qui rend la cratialité décisive dans notre paradigme. Car elle travaille en amont de toute possible contestation et en aval de tout fondement. Elle agit avant la réclamation et après le principe. Elle ne parle pas, mais elle configure les possibilités d’action : ce que l’on peut faire, ce que l’on doit fournir, où l’on peut passer, avec qui l’on peut parler, à quel moment une procédure ou une démarche est susceptible de relance ou s’avère réellement close. En cela, ce sont les chaînes opératoires — non pas les discours — qui rendent compte du régime véritable d’un ordre. En quelque sorte, elle en révèle *sa conduite* et *son conduit*. +C'est précisément cette possibilité de neutralisation, de relocalisation +ou d'inopérance de la scène qui rend la cratialité décisive dans notre +paradigme. Car elle travaille en amont de toute possible contestation et +en aval de tout fondement. Elle agit avant la réclamation et après le +principe. Elle ne parle pas, mais elle configure les possibilités +d'action : ce que l'on peut faire, ce que l'on doit fournir, où l'on +peut passer, avec qui l'on peut parler, à quel moment une procédure ou +une démarche est susceptible de relance ou s'avère réellement close. En +cela, ce sont les chaînes opératoires — non pas les discours — qui +rendent compte du régime véritable d'un ordre. En quelque sorte, elle en +révèle *sa conduite* et *son conduit*. -Dans les pratiques sociales ordinaires, la *cratialité* se manifeste sans protocole formel. Lorsqu’un étudiant s’adresse à un secrétariat, lorsqu’un réfugié tente d’accéder à un guichet saturé, lorsqu’un malade cherche un rendez-vous sur Doctolib, ce ne sont pas les normes écrites qui produisent la régulation, mais les séquences d’opérations réelles : les créneaux disponibles, la tolérance de l’agent, la posture du guichet, l’existence ou non d’un canal alternatif, la résilience du dispositif face à la surcharge. Une *cratialité* se reconnaît au fait que le sujet modifie son agir en fonction de la chaîne d’effectuation perçue ou anticipée — même s’il n’en connaît ni la structure ni les règles exactes. +Dans les pratiques sociales ordinaires, la *cratialité* se manifeste +sans protocole formel. Lorsqu'un étudiant s'adresse à un secrétariat, +lorsqu'un réfugié tente d'accéder à un guichet saturé, lorsqu'un malade +cherche un rendez-vous sur Doctolib, ce ne sont pas les normes écrites +qui produisent la régulation, mais les séquences d'opérations réelles : +les créneaux disponibles, la tolérance de l'agent, la posture du +guichet, l'existence ou non d'un canal alternatif, la résilience du +dispositif face à la surcharge. Une *cratialité* se reconnaît au fait +que le sujet modifie son agir en fonction de la chaîne d'effectuation +perçue ou anticipée — même s'il n'en connaît ni la structure ni les +règles exactes. -On ne saurait confiner la *cratialité* à l’espace institutionnel. Dans les écosystèmes marchands, elle structure l’accès aux marchés, la hiérarchie des clientèles, les espaces de vente, les rythmes de renouvellement ou même les circuits de réparation ou de mis au rebut. Par exemple, lorsqu’une marque verrouille la possibilité de réparer un appareil, ou lorsqu’une place de marché reporte une commande pour maximiser un panier moyen, c’est une *cratialité* qui opère : non pas sous la forme d’une interdiction, mais d’un ajustement implicite des possibilités d’action sous-jacentes ou connexes. De même, dans l’univers du crédit à la consommation, les seuils de déclenchement, les routines de relance, les scripts d’acceptation et de rejet, les boucles d’endettement structurent une régulation par la dette — sans qu’aucune scène d’autorité n’ait à apparaître. +On ne saurait confiner la *cratialité* à l'espace institutionnel. Dans +les écosystèmes marchands, elle structure l'accès aux marchés, la +hiérarchie des clientèles, les espaces de vente, les rythmes de +renouvellement ou même les circuits de réparation ou de mis au rebut. +Par exemple, lorsqu'une marque verrouille la possibilité de réparer un +appareil, ou lorsqu'une place de marché reporte une commande pour +maximiser un panier moyen, c'est une *cratialité* qui opère : non pas +sous la forme d'une interdiction, mais d'un ajustement implicite des +possibilités d'action sous-jacentes ou connexes. De même, dans l'univers +du crédit à la consommation, les seuils de déclenchement, les routines +de relance, les scripts d'acceptation et de rejet, les boucles +d'endettement structurent une régulation par la dette — sans qu'aucune +scène d'autorité n'ait à apparaître. -Dans les logiques environnementales, la *cratialité* peut prendre la forme de barrières physiques (clôtures, canaux), d’interdictions de prélèvement, de modulations de quota, de déclencheurs de dispositifs d’alerte. De sorte qu’un niveau de pollution franchi peut suspendre le trafic, rediriger des flux, interdire l’usage d’une zone — par l’effet combiné d’instruments de mesure, de seuils préprogrammés et de dispositifs de verrouillage. Cette régulation ne suppose ni acteur visible ni débat public. Elle agit par chaîne. Et c’est cette chaîne — non sa justification — qui par exemple constitue le *régime cratial* de la gestion écologique — dans les faits. +Dans les logiques environnementales, la *cratialité* peut prendre la +forme de barrières physiques (clôtures, canaux), d'interdictions de +prélèvement, de modulations de quota, de déclencheurs de dispositifs +d'alerte. De sorte qu'un niveau de pollution franchi peut suspendre le +trafic, rediriger des flux, interdire l'usage d'une zone — par l'effet +combiné d'instruments de mesure, de seuils préprogrammés et de +dispositifs de verrouillage. Cette régulation ne suppose ni acteur +visible ni débat public. Elle agit par chaîne. Et c'est cette chaîne — non sa justification — qui par exemple constitue le *régime cratial* +de la gestion écologique — dans les faits. -On retrouve ce même mécanisme dans les mécanismes migratoires : un dispositif de visa, un fichier de police, une fermeture administrative, une alerte biométrique, un fichier d’exclusion partagé de ressortissants entre États. Chacun de ces gestes — souvent silencieux, parfois automatisé — transforme l’état d’un sujet sans jamais apparaître comme une décision. Il ne s’agit pas d’arbitraire, mais de *cratialité brute et opaque* : une régulation agissant par action différée, à scène neutralisée ou relocalisée, et à fondement implicite, euphémisé ou difficilement exposable. +On retrouve ce même mécanisme dans les mécanismes migratoires : un +dispositif de visa, un fichier de police, une fermeture administrative, +une alerte biométrique, un fichier d'exclusion partagé de ressortissants +entre États. Chacun de ces gestes — souvent silencieux, parfois +automatisé — transforme l'état d'un sujet sans jamais apparaître comme +une décision. Il ne s'agit pas d'arbitraire, mais de *cratialité brute +et opaque* : une régulation agissant par action différée, à scène +neutralisée ou relocalisée, et à fondement implicite, euphémisé ou +difficilement exposable. -Le problème fondamental n’est donc pas à nos yeux de savoir si une régulation est automatisée ou humaine, numérique ou analogique. Ce qui importe, c’est la morphologie de la chaîne d’effectuation : *peut-on en reconstituer les étapes ? Qui ou qu’est-ce qui a agi durant celles-ci ? Au nom de quoi ? Quelles ont été concrètement les actions conduites ? Quels en ont été leurs effets ? Au profit ou au détriment de qui ? Existe-t-il des seuils de suspension ? des marges de correction ? des points d’interruption ?* Voilà autant de questions qui constituent la tenue d’une enquête sur la *cratialité*. C’est ce à quoi le paradigme archicratique s’attèle, et ce qu’elle entend *in fine* saisir : une topologie factuelle des régimes opératoires prise dans des situations effectives. +Le problème fondamental n'est donc pas à nos yeux de savoir si une +régulation est automatisée ou humaine, numérique ou analogique. Ce qui +importe, c'est la morphologie de la chaîne d'effectuation : *peut-on en +reconstituer les étapes ? Qui ou qu'est-ce qui a agi durant celles-ci ? +Au nom de quoi ? Quelles ont été concrètement les actions conduites ? +Quels en ont été leurs effets ? Au profit ou au détriment de qui ? +Existe-t-il des seuils de suspension ? des marges de correction ? des +points d'interruption ?* Voilà autant de questions qui constituent la +tenue d'une enquête sur la *cratialité*. C'est ce à quoi le paradigme +archicratique s'attèle, et ce qu'elle entend *in fine* saisir : une +topologie factuelle des régimes opératoires prise dans des situations +effectives. -Mais une *cratialité* ne se définit pas uniquement par sa capacité à produire un effet : elle se mesure aussi à sa tenue dans le temps, à sa stabilité opérationnelle, à sa modularité sous contrainte, à sa résilience face à l’imprévu. Car une chaîne opératoire n’existe jamais à l’état pur. Elle peut s’user, se tendre, se corrompre, rompre ou bifurquer. Elle se voit parfois contournée, saturée, détournée, paralysée, ou plus discrètement reconfigurée. Une *morphologie cratiale* est donc exposée à des dynamiques de dégradation, de fragilisation, mais aussi de rétablissement, d’ajustement, voire d’invention ou d’innovation. +Mais une *cratialité* ne se définit pas uniquement par sa capacité à +produire un effet : elle se mesure aussi à sa tenue dans le temps, à sa +stabilité opérationnelle, à sa modularité sous contrainte, à sa +résilience face à l'imprévu. Car une chaîne opératoire n'existe jamais à +l'état pur. Elle peut s'user, se tendre, se corrompre, rompre ou +bifurquer. Elle se voit parfois contournée, saturée, détournée, +paralysée, ou plus discrètement reconfigurée. Une *morphologie cratiale* +est donc exposée à des dynamiques de dégradation, de fragilisation, mais +aussi de rétablissement, d'ajustement, voire d'invention ou +d'innovation. -Il faut insister ici sur un point : toute *cratialité* robustement constituée doit incorporer la possibilité d’une reprise comme structure interne indispensable. Une *chaîne cratiale* sans seuil de suspension, sans point de retour, sans espace de correction, sans marge d’interruption ne gagne pas nécessairement en efficacité, elle bascule surtout alors dans l’autonomie. Elle cesse d’être opératoire au sens archicratique pour devenir mécanique autoritaire — c’est-à-dire, précisément, une chaîne close sur elle-même — indifférente à la perturbation comme au contexte. +Il faut insister ici sur un point : toute *cratialité* robustement +constituée doit incorporer la possibilité d'une reprise comme structure +interne indispensable. Une *chaîne cratiale* sans seuil de suspension, +sans point de retour, sans espace de correction, sans marge +d'interruption ne gagne pas nécessairement en efficacité, elle bascule +surtout alors dans l'autonomie. Elle cesse d'être opératoire au sens +archicratique pour devenir mécanique autoritaire — c'est-à-dire, +précisément, une chaîne close sur elle-même — indifférente à la +perturbation comme au contexte. -Au contraire, une *cratialité* bien tenue ménage ses seuils de réversibilité. Un formulaire annulable, un outil remplaçable, une opération suspensive, une procédure rattrapable : autant de configurations qui ne nuisent pas à l’ordre, mais en assurent l’intégrité morphologique. On retrouve ici une propriété critique : la capacité à se reprendre sans se déliter. C’est ce qui fait qu’un dispositif d’action peut être réajusté, relancé, corrigé depuis ses propres règles internes, sans nécessiter un appel extérieur. +Au contraire, une *cratialité* bien tenue ménage ses seuils de +réversibilité. Un formulaire annulable, un outil remplaçable, une +opération suspensive, une procédure rattrapable : autant de +configurations qui ne nuisent pas à l'ordre, mais en assurent +l'intégrité morphologique. On retrouve ici une propriété critique : la +capacité à se reprendre sans se déliter. C'est ce qui fait qu'un +dispositif d'action peut être réajusté, relancé, corrigé depuis ses +propres règles internes, sans nécessiter un appel extérieur. -À l’inverse, lorsque cette réversibilité fait défaut, c’est une *configuration cratiale* entière qui devient problématique. Le sujet affecté devient captif d’une chaîne inappropriée ; l’agent devient impuissant à infléchir le processus ; la structure devient autistique, sourde à l’exception, insensible aux calibres, aveugle aux gabarits. Dans ces cas, la *cratialité* ne disparaît pas : elle s’enkyste. Elle continue certes d’opérer, mais sans contact avec le réel et aux effets engendrés. +À l'inverse, lorsque cette réversibilité fait défaut, c'est une +*configuration cratiale* entière qui devient problématique. Le sujet +affecté devient captif d'une chaîne inappropriée ; l'agent devient +impuissant à infléchir le processus ; la structure devient autistique, +sourde à l'exception, insensible aux calibres, aveugle aux gabarits. +Dans ces cas, la *cratialité* ne disparaît pas : elle s'enkyste. Elle +continue certes d'opérer, mais sans contact avec le réel et aux effets +engendrés. -Cette *fragilisation cratiale* peut prendre des formes très diverses. Elle peut être le produit d’une surcharge : trop de demandes, trop peu de relais, trop d’automatisme, trop d’étapes. Elle peut être due à une configuration rigide : un script mal pensé, un ordre de traitement non modifiable, un couplage trop serré entre modules. Elle peut venir d’une mauvaise attribution : trop de délégation sans vérification, trop d’autonomie sans articulation, trop d’interfaces sans mémoire. Dans tous les cas, ce qui se délite n’est pas la norme, mais l’agencement opératoire lui-même — ses points de contact, ses seuils de bascule, sa cadence ou sa capacité à absorber la friction. C’est la production de l’ordre tout entier qui se voit en pâtir. +Cette *fragilisation cratiale* peut prendre des formes très diverses. +Elle peut être le produit d'une surcharge : trop de demandes, trop peu +de relais, trop d'automatisme, trop d'étapes. Elle peut être due à une +configuration rigide : un script mal pensé, un ordre de traitement non +modifiable, un couplage trop serré entre modules. Elle peut venir d'une +mauvaise attribution : trop de délégation sans vérification, trop +d'autonomie sans articulation, trop d'interfaces sans mémoire. Dans tous +les cas, ce qui se délite n'est pas la norme, mais l'agencement +opératoire lui-même — ses points de contact, ses seuils de bascule, sa +cadence ou sa capacité à absorber la friction. C'est la production de +l'ordre tout entier qui se voit en pâtir. -Or, cette friction n’est pas accidentelle. Elle fait partie intégrante des *formes cratiales*. On pourrait même dire qu’il n’y a pas de *cratialité* sans tension interne. Un dispositif parfaitement lisse, sans écarts, sans résistances, sans latences, est un mythe gestionnaire. Il suppose un monde sans aléas, sans corps, sans esprits, sans incidents. Mais les chaînes opératoires réelles — qu’elles soient administratives, logistiques, environnementales, numériques, économiques ou sociales — sont traversées de bruits, de retards, de rétentions, de surcharges, de forçages, de contestations même silencieuses. Ce sont aussi ces frictions — et la manière dont la chaîne y répond — qui donnent à une *cratialité* sa texture propre. +Or, cette friction n'est pas accidentelle. Elle fait partie intégrante +des *formes cratiales*. On pourrait même dire qu'il n'y a pas de +*cratialité* sans tension interne. Un dispositif parfaitement lisse, +sans écarts, sans résistances, sans latences, est un mythe gestionnaire. +Il suppose un monde sans aléas, sans corps, sans esprits, sans +incidents. Mais les chaînes opératoires réelles — qu'elles soient +administratives, logistiques, environnementales, numériques, économiques +ou sociales — sont traversées de bruits, de retards, de rétentions, de +surcharges, de forçages, de contestations même silencieuses. Ce sont +aussi ces frictions — et la manière dont la chaîne y répond — qui +donnent à une *cratialité* sa texture propre. -À ce titre, il faut comprendre que la *conflictualité cratiale* n’est pas l’apanage des grands affrontements. Elle peut être infime, infra-minimale, larvée : un bug récurrent qu’aucun agent ne sait résoudre, une désactivation discrète d’un module jugé trop exposant, une grève par un service en surcharge, un refus d’exécuter un ordre trop flou ou controversé, une latence volontaire introduite dans le système pour ralentir le flux. Toutes ces micro-déviations — qu’elles soient humaines, non-humaines ou techniques — ne suspendent pas nécessairement la chaîne, mais en modifient silencieusement l’opérativité. Ce sont des *formes cratiales* de résistance, non déclarées, mais effectives. +À ce titre, il faut comprendre que la *conflictualité cratiale* n'est +pas l'apanage des grands affrontements. Elle peut être infime, +infra-minimale, larvée : un bug récurrent qu'aucun agent ne sait +résoudre, une désactivation discrète d'un module jugé trop exposant, une +grève par un service en surcharge, un refus d'exécuter un ordre trop +flou ou controversé, une latence volontaire introduite dans le système +pour ralentir le flux. Toutes ces micro-déviations — qu'elles soient +humaines, non-humaines ou techniques — ne suspendent pas +nécessairement la chaîne, mais en modifient silencieusement +l'opérativité. Ce sont des *formes cratiales* de résistance, non +déclarées, mais effectives. -Autrement dit : le sabotage, la friction, la fuite, le ralentissement, la désactivation, la grève, la redondance, le blocage localisé — tout cela fait partie des *régimes cratiaux*. Ce sont des gestes qui modulent l’enchaînement, qui bloquent un relais, qui désactivent un seuil, qui créent une bifurcation dans le flux, sans pour autant quitter le plan de l’opération. Il s’agit d’opérer dans la chaîne : d’en éprouver la plasticité, d’en redessiner les flux, de court-circuiter un effet, de reprogrammer une action. +Autrement dit : le sabotage, la friction, la fuite, le ralentissement, +la désactivation, la grève, la redondance, le blocage localisé — tout +cela fait partie des *régimes cratiaux*. Ce sont des gestes qui modulent +l'enchaînement, qui bloquent un relais, qui désactivent un seuil, qui +créent une bifurcation dans le flux, sans pour autant quitter le plan de +l'opération. Il s'agit d'opérer dans la chaîne : d'en éprouver la +plasticité, d'en redessiner les flux, de court-circuiter un effet, de +reprogrammer une action. -Prenons ici quelques exemples empiriques, non pour illustrer, mais pour inscrire ces mécanismes dans des formes attestées. Lorsqu’un agent de guichet ralentit volontairement le traitement d’un dossier pour ménager un délai de respiration dans une procédure trop brutale — il n’interrompt pas la *cratialité*, il la reconfigure temporairement. Lorsqu’un réseau de soutien organise le contournement logistique d’un dispositif d’exclusion (hébergement provisoire, traduction des procédures, aide à la complétude de dossiers), il ne suspend pas l’ordre, il agit sur ses relais. Lorsqu’un collectif militant diffuse une extension qui neutralise un algorithme de recommandation, il ne produit pas une alternative discursive — il modifie le geste. +Prenons ici quelques exemples empiriques, non pour illustrer, mais pour +inscrire ces mécanismes dans des formes attestées. Lorsqu'un agent de +guichet ralentit volontairement le traitement d'un dossier pour ménager +un délai de respiration dans une procédure trop brutale — il +n'interrompt pas la *cratialité*, il la reconfigure temporairement. +Lorsqu'un réseau de soutien organise le contournement logistique d'un +dispositif d'exclusion (hébergement provisoire, traduction des +procédures, aide à la complétude de dossiers), il ne suspend pas +l'ordre, il agit sur ses relais. Lorsqu'un collectif militant diffuse +une extension qui neutralise un algorithme de recommandation, il ne +produit pas une alternative discursive — il modifie le geste. -Dans chacun de ces cas, ce qui est touché, ce n’est ni la règle ni le texte : c’est l’enchaînement lui-même. Et ce geste — quand bien même silencieux — est bien *cratial*. +Dans chacun de ces cas, ce qui est touché, ce n'est ni la règle ni le +texte : c'est l'enchaînement lui-même. Et ce geste — quand bien même +silencieux — est bien *cratial*. -C’est dans ce registre qu’il faut aussi penser les formes de retrait comme reconfiguration. Ainsi, lorsqu’un gestionnaire de plateforme désactive, sans avertissement, un bouton de désabonnement pour un service payant, ce n’est pas un oubli ergonomique : c’est une désarticulation intentionnelle d’un geste opératoire, visant à bloquer un enchaînement qui permettrait au sujet d’agir selon ses intentions ou ses objectifs. De même, dans certaines plateformes de services publics, le retrait silencieux d’une fonction de dépôt — sans nouvelle procédure annoncée — crée une *zone cratiale fantôme* : la chaîne continue d’opérer en arrière-plan (décisions, échéances, pénalités), mais sans possibilité d’intervention active du sujet régulé. Ici, le retrait n’annule pas l’opération, il la désindexe du geste attendu. Et c’est précisément cette désindexation qui redéfinit la morphologie de la régulation. +C'est dans ce registre qu'il faut aussi penser les formes de retrait +comme reconfiguration. Ainsi, lorsqu'un gestionnaire de plateforme +désactive, sans avertissement, un bouton de désabonnement pour un +service payant, ce n'est pas un oubli ergonomique : c'est une +désarticulation intentionnelle d'un geste opératoire, visant à bloquer +un enchaînement qui permettrait au sujet d'agir selon ses intentions ou +ses objectifs. De même, dans certaines plateformes de services publics, +le retrait silencieux d'une fonction de dépôt — sans nouvelle +procédure annoncée — crée une *zone cratiale fantôme* : la chaîne +continue d'opérer en arrière-plan (décisions, échéances, pénalités), +mais sans possibilité d'intervention active du sujet régulé. Ici, le +retrait n'annule pas l'opération, il la désindexe du geste attendu. Et +c'est précisément cette désindexation qui redéfinit la morphologie de la +régulation. -Ces formes de retrait peuvent être *discrètes* (fonctionnalité désactivée), *différées* (interruption sans notification), ou *stratégiques* (suppression temporaire d’un canal critique à l’approche d’un seuil). Elles n’empêchent pas l’ordre d’opérer, mais elles en reconfigurent les seuils d’accès, de bifurcation ou de modulation. Il ne s’agit donc pas de défauts ponctuels, mais de *gestes cratiaux silencieux*, structurants, parfois irréversibles. +Ces formes de retrait peuvent être *discrètes* (fonctionnalité +désactivée), *différées* (interruption sans notification), ou +*stratégiques* (suppression temporaire d'un canal critique à l'approche +d'un seuil). Elles n'empêchent pas l'ordre d'opérer, mais elles en +reconfigurent les seuils d'accès, de bifurcation ou de modulation. Il ne +s'agit donc pas de défauts ponctuels, mais de *gestes cratiaux +silencieux*, structurants, parfois irréversibles. -On peut résumer ainsi : une cratialité robuste encaisse, plie, module, bifurque, relance. Une cratialité fragile sature, bloque, s’enkyste, se dissocie. Une cratialité dégradée fonctionne sans agir, agit sans exposer, expose sans effet. Une cratialité critique, enfin, incorpore la friction sans s’effondrer — elle maintient une chaîne opératoire dans l’épreuve du réel, sans recourir à l’exception. +On peut résumer ainsi : une cratialité robuste encaisse, plie, module, +bifurque, relance. Une cratialité fragile sature, bloque, s'enkyste, se +dissocie. Une cratialité dégradée fonctionne sans agir, agit sans +exposer, expose sans effet. Une cratialité critique, enfin, incorpore la +friction sans s'effondrer — elle maintient une chaîne opératoire dans +l'épreuve du réel, sans recourir à l'exception. -La cratialité ne se confond ni avec la gouvernance, ni avec la technicité, ni avec la procédure. Elle désigne l’exercice effectif d’un ordre dans ses tensions propres : sa capacité à agir malgré l’interruption, à tenir malgré la friction. Ce n’est pas le règne de l’exécution parfaite, mais le champ toujours partiel, jamais neutre, d’une opérabilité exposée au réel. C’est là que se joue la condition critique de toute régulation habitable.  +La cratialité ne se confond ni avec la gouvernance, ni avec la +technicité, ni avec la procédure. Elle désigne l'exercice effectif d'un +ordre dans ses tensions propres : sa capacité à agir malgré +l'interruption, à tenir malgré la friction. Ce n'est pas le règne de +l'exécution parfaite, mais le champ toujours partiel, jamais neutre, +d'une opérabilité exposée au réel. C'est là que se joue la condition +critique de toute régulation habitable.  -### 1.7.3 — Les *formes d’archicration* : scènes qui reçoivent, suspendent et révisent +### 1.7.3 — Les *formes d'archicration* : scènes qui reçoivent, suspendent et révisent -Tout régime régulateur, quelle que soit sa cohérence interne ou sa puissance opératoire, rencontre un seuil critique où la seule invocation du fondement ne suffit plus à convaincre, et où la pure efficacité de l’opération ne suffit plus à légitimer. Ce seuil, morphologiquement constitutif, ne marque ni la fin de la régulation ni son échec, mais une exigence : que l’ordre, pour demeurer habitable, s’ouvre à une adresse où ses effets peuvent être rapportés, ses motifs interrogés, ses seuils réévalués. C’est là qu’apparaît la nécessité du troisième pli, de la troisième forme, du troisième moment : l’*archicration*. +Tout régime régulateur, quelle que soit sa cohérence interne ou sa +puissance opératoire, rencontre un seuil critique où la seule invocation +du fondement ne suffit plus à convaincre, et où la pure efficacité de +l'opération ne suffit plus à légitimer. Ce seuil, morphologiquement +constitutif, ne marque ni la fin de la régulation ni son échec, mais une +exigence : que l'ordre, pour demeurer habitable, s'ouvre à une adresse +où ses effets peuvent être rapportés, ses motifs interrogés, ses seuils +réévalués. C'est là qu'apparaît la nécessité du troisième pli, de la +troisième forme, du troisième moment : l'*archicration*. -Par ce terme, il ne faut entendre ni une forme de contestation extérieure, ni un supplément moral ou procédural, ni une simple logique de recours. L’archicration désigne la configuration dans laquelle une régulation devient, de façon située, différée et contextualisée, réinscriptible à partir de ses propres effets et de ses propres principes. Elle constitue non l’effondrement de l’ordre, mais l’exposition opératoire qui rend possible sa justification et sa reprise. Elle ne se substitue ni à l’*arcalité* ni à la *cratialité*, mais les oblige à rendre raison de ce qu’elles ont produit, sans pour autant en dissoudre la structure. +Par ce terme, il ne faut entendre ni une forme de contestation +extérieure, ni un supplément moral ou procédural, ni une simple logique +de recours. L'archicration désigne la configuration dans laquelle une +régulation devient, de façon située, différée et contextualisée, +réinscriptible à partir de ses propres effets et de ses propres +principes. Elle constitue non l'effondrement de l'ordre, mais +l'exposition opératoire qui rend possible sa justification et sa +reprise. Elle ne se substitue ni à l'*arcalité* ni à la *cratialité*, +mais les oblige à rendre raison de ce qu'elles ont produit, sans pour +autant en dissoudre la structure. -Une archicration n’est jamais un pur événement discursif : elle est une scène de régulation, c’est-à-dire un agencement où un effet peut être rapporté à un motif. Ce n’est pas l’expression d’un simple désaccord, ni la formalisation d’un désaveu ; c’est un *moment structuré où l’ordre devient*, même brièvement, *redevable de ce qu’il produit*. Une *scène archicrative oblige à réentendre ce qui a été dit depuis ce qui a été fait*. L’ordre y devient redevable non par obligation éthique, mais par contrainte morphologique : ce qu’il fait, il doit pouvoir l’assumer dans un espace d’interpellation recevable. C’est cette obligation de comparution située qui distingue la régulation vivante de la régulation inerte. +Une archicration n'est jamais un pur événement discursif : elle est une +scène de régulation, c'est-à-dire un agencement où un effet peut être +rapporté à un motif. Ce n'est pas l'expression d'un simple désaccord, ni +la formalisation d'un désaveu ; c'est un *moment structuré où l'ordre +devient*, même brièvement, *redevable de ce qu'il produit*. Une *scène +archicrative oblige à réentendre ce qui a été dit depuis ce qui a été +fait*. L'ordre y devient redevable non par obligation éthique, mais par +contrainte morphologique : ce qu'il fait, il doit pouvoir l'assumer dans +un espace d'interpellation recevable. C'est cette obligation de +comparution située qui distingue la régulation vivante de la régulation +inerte. -Une telle scène ne vaut que si elle articule plusieurs conditions spécifiques, qui ne se résument pas à une posture d’écoute bienveillante ou à une structure formelle d’appel. Pour opérer, elle doit être traversable, suspensive, adressable, modifiable et mémorisable. Cinq fonctions solidaires, qu’on ne peut isoler sans vider la scène de sa portée critique. +Une telle scène ne vaut que si elle articule plusieurs conditions +spécifiques, qui ne se résument pas à une posture d'écoute bienveillante +ou à une structure formelle d'appel. Pour opérer, elle doit être +traversable, suspensive, adressable, modifiable et mémorisable. Cinq +fonctions solidaires, qu'on ne peut isoler sans vider la scène de sa +portée critique. -L’*accès*, d’abord, n’est pas simplement un droit formel. Il ne suffit pas que la scène existe dans les textes ou dans les intentions : encore faut-il qu’elle puisse être rejointe dans des conditions concrètes. Dans certains villages des hauts plateaux andins, une scène de justice communautaire ne devient accessible que si un ancien accepte d’introduire le plaignant dans la parole collective, lors d’un conseil rituel tenu à heure solaire fixe. L’accès dépend ici d’une médiation humaine, d’un protocole implicite, d’un ancrage territorial. En Europe, à une autre échelle, une réunion de copropriété ou une assemblée de colocataires constitue aussi une scène d’archicration ordinaire : mais encore faut-il que les convocations soient claires, que les horaires soient compatibles avec les temps de vie, que le langage employé ne disqualifie pas d’emblée ceux qui veulent s’exprimer. L’accès n’est jamais garanti par la seule existence de la scène : il se joue dans les seuils, les médiations, les rythmes. +L'*accès*, d'abord, n'est pas simplement un droit formel. Il ne suffit +pas que la scène existe dans les textes ou dans les intentions : encore +faut-il qu'elle puisse être rejointe dans des conditions concrètes. Dans +certains villages des hauts plateaux andins, une scène de justice +communautaire ne devient accessible que si un ancien accepte +d'introduire le plaignant dans la parole collective, lors d'un conseil +rituel tenu à heure solaire fixe. L'accès dépend ici d'une médiation +humaine, d'un protocole implicite, d'un ancrage territorial. En Europe, +à une autre échelle, une réunion de copropriété ou une assemblée de +colocataires constitue aussi une scène d'archicration ordinaire : mais +encore faut-il que les convocations soient claires, que les horaires +soient compatibles avec les temps de vie, que le langage employé ne +disqualifie pas d'emblée ceux qui veulent s'exprimer. L'accès n'est +jamais garanti par la seule existence de la scène : il se joue dans les +seuils, les médiations, les rythmes. -La *suspension*, ensuite, est ce qui garantit que l’exposition de l’ordre ne soit pas un leurre. Tant qu’un acte régulateur continue de produire ses effets pendant qu’on tente de le requalifier, il n’y a pas de scène — il y a simulacre. Dans certaines sociétés coutumières d’Afrique de l’Ouest, lorsqu’un conflit est porté devant le cercle de palabre, les activités concernées — culture d’une terre disputée, usage d’un chemin commun — sont suspendues jusqu’à résolution. De même, dans le monde contemporain, une audience prud’homale n’a de sens que si l’exécution d’un licenciement peut être gelée temporairement, le temps que les parties comparent leurs versions. Le différé n’est pas un retard : c’est un espace de décélération volontaire qui rend l’examen possible. +La *suspension*, ensuite, est ce qui garantit que l'exposition de +l'ordre ne soit pas un leurre. Tant qu'un acte régulateur continue de +produire ses effets pendant qu'on tente de le requalifier, il n'y a pas +de scène — il y a simulacre. Dans certaines sociétés coutumières +d'Afrique de l'Ouest, lorsqu'un conflit est porté devant le cercle de +palabre, les activités concernées — culture d'une terre disputée, +usage d'un chemin commun — sont suspendues jusqu'à résolution. De +même, dans le monde contemporain, une audience prud'homale n'a de sens +que si l'exécution d'un licenciement peut être gelée temporairement, le +temps que les parties comparent leurs versions. Le différé n'est pas un +retard : c'est un espace de décélération volontaire qui rend l'examen +possible. -La *comparution* constitue le noyau actif de l’agencement. Elle ne vise pas à trancher un litige au sens judiciaire, mais à mettre en regard — dans un espace donné — des éléments auparavant dissociés : un motif initial, un effet produit, un sujet affecté, une opération appliquée, un traitement injuste. Dans certaines cérémonies de réparation au sein de communautés aborigènes, le coupable, les victimes, les témoins et les anciens se tiennent ensemble dans un cercle symbolique, et chacun expose ce qu’il a vu, vécu, compris : non pour que triomphe une version, mais pour que l’effet soit rendu visible. En Europe, la comparution prend parfois des formes plus informelles mais non moins fortes : un salarié convoqué à un entretien disciplinaire face à son supérieur peut y opposer non seulement des arguments, mais la narration de son vécu. L’enjeu n’est pas d’établir une vérité objective, mais de rendre commensurable, dans une structure partagée, ce que l’ordre fait et ce que le sujet vit. Comparaître, ici, c’est traduire — ce qui est souvent plus exigeant. +La *comparution* constitue le noyau actif de l'agencement. Elle ne vise +pas à trancher un litige au sens judiciaire, mais à mettre en regard — dans un espace donné — des éléments auparavant dissociés : un motif +initial, un effet produit, un sujet affecté, une opération appliquée, un +traitement injuste. Dans certaines cérémonies de réparation au sein de +communautés aborigènes, le coupable, les victimes, les témoins et les +anciens se tiennent ensemble dans un cercle symbolique, et chacun expose +ce qu'il a vu, vécu, compris : non pour que triomphe une version, mais +pour que l'effet soit rendu visible. En Europe, la comparution prend +parfois des formes plus informelles mais non moins fortes : un salarié +convoqué à un entretien disciplinaire face à son supérieur peut y +opposer non seulement des arguments, mais la narration de son vécu. +L'enjeu n'est pas d'établir une vérité objective, mais de rendre +commensurable, dans une structure partagée, ce que l'ordre fait et ce +que le sujet vit. Comparaître, ici, c'est traduire — ce qui est +souvent plus exigeant. -La *réversibilité*, ensuite, signifie que le geste régulateur peut être reconfiguré à partir de ce qui a été entendu, sans renier pour autant le principe de régulation. Elle peut être implicite ou déclarée, formalisée ou improvisée. Dans certaines zones à défendre, lorsqu’une assemblée critique remet en question une décision prise en petit comité, une nouvelle délibération peut être ouverte, un protocole modifié, une règle suspendue temporairement. Rien n’y est définitif, mais tout peut être réinscrit. À l’autre extrémité, dans les institutions européennes de médiation administrative (comme le Médiateur de la République ou les Défenseurs des droits), des décisions peuvent être infléchies à partir de cas singuliers reconnus comme révélateurs de déséquilibres structurels. Cette plasticité critique ne déstabilise pas la régulation : elle l’empêche de se durcir en mécanisme tautologique. Sans elle, la scène ne serait qu’un couloir de plainte sans issue. +La *réversibilité*, ensuite, signifie que le geste régulateur peut être +reconfiguré à partir de ce qui a été entendu, sans renier pour autant le +principe de régulation. Elle peut être implicite ou déclarée, formalisée +ou improvisée. Dans certaines zones à défendre, lorsqu'une assemblée +critique remet en question une décision prise en petit comité, une +nouvelle délibération peut être ouverte, un protocole modifié, une règle +suspendue temporairement. Rien n'y est définitif, mais tout peut être +réinscrit. À l'autre extrémité, dans les institutions européennes de +médiation administrative (comme le Médiateur de la République ou les +Défenseurs des droits), des décisions peuvent être infléchies à partir +de cas singuliers reconnus comme révélateurs de déséquilibres +structurels. Cette plasticité critique ne déstabilise pas la régulation +: elle l'empêche de se durcir en mécanisme tautologique. Sans elle, la +scène ne serait qu'un couloir de plainte sans issue. -La *mémorisation*, enfin, ne vise ni l’archive technique, ni le fichage bureaucratique, même si elle en produit parfois les signes. Elle constitue avant tout le socle critique à partir duquel les régulations futures deviennent informées par les scènes passées. Dans certaines sociétés insulaires du Pacifique, un conflit grave entre familles reste inscrit dans la mémoire collective à travers une chanson, une légende, un totem déplacé : la mémoire ne conserve pas la faute, mais la scène qui l’a rendue adressable. À l’opposé, dans les universités européennes, les comités de discipline ou les commissions d’éthique conservent des procès-verbaux — non pour punir deux fois, mais pour ajuster les régulations futures. Ce que la mémoire rend possible, ce n’est pas la traçabilité pure, mais l’accumulation de tensions significatives. Une régulation sans mémoire critique est une régulation condamnée à son propre oubli. +La *mémorisation*, enfin, ne vise ni l'archive technique, ni le fichage +bureaucratique, même si elle en produit parfois les signes. Elle +constitue avant tout le socle critique à partir duquel les régulations +futures deviennent informées par les scènes passées. Dans certaines +sociétés insulaires du Pacifique, un conflit grave entre familles reste +inscrit dans la mémoire collective à travers une chanson, une légende, +un totem déplacé : la mémoire ne conserve pas la faute, mais la scène +qui l'a rendue adressable. À l'opposé, dans les universités européennes, +les comités de discipline ou les commissions d'éthique conservent des +procès-verbaux — non pour punir deux fois, mais pour ajuster les +régulations futures. Ce que la mémoire rend possible, ce n'est pas la +traçabilité pure, mais l'accumulation de tensions significatives. Une +régulation sans mémoire critique est une régulation condamnée à son +propre oubli. -Ces cinq fonctions, dès lors, ne peuvent être isolées sans être dénaturées. Un accès sans suspension ne protège pas. Une suspension sans comparution ne produit pas d’effet. Une comparution sans réversibilité déstabilise sans modifier. Une réversibilité sans mémoire corrige sans apprendre. Et une mémoire sans accès transforme la critique en spectre stérile. C’est leur articulation — située, réalisée, encadrée — qui donne lieu à une *scène archicrative* proprement dite. +Ces cinq fonctions, dès lors, ne peuvent être isolées sans être +dénaturées. Un accès sans suspension ne protège pas. Une suspension sans +comparution ne produit pas d'effet. Une comparution sans réversibilité +déstabilise sans modifier. Une réversibilité sans mémoire corrige sans +apprendre. Et une mémoire sans accès transforme la critique en spectre +stérile. C'est leur articulation — située, réalisée, encadrée — qui +donne lieu à une *scène archicrative* proprement dite. -Cette morphologie archicrative, nous l’avons dit, ne se laisse jamais réduire à la seule logique institutionnelle. La scène n’est pas l’apanage des structures formelles du droit ou des mécanismes administratifs. Elle peut surgir dans les interstices d’un collectif, dans le pli d’un rituel, dans l’épaisseur d’une adresse improvisée, dans la densité d’une discussion entre pairs. Ce qui fait scène, ce n’est ni le statut de l’arène ni le nom de l’institution : c’est la possibilité concrète pour une régulation de se rendre visible à partir de ce qu’elle a produit, pour un sujet d’y accéder, d’y parler, d’y être entendu, et pour l’ordre d’y être infléchi. La morphologie archicrative s’apparente à une grammaire topologique de la requalification, non à une typologie stricte des lieux. +Cette morphologie archicrative, nous l'avons dit, ne se laisse jamais +réduire à la seule logique institutionnelle. La scène n'est pas +l'apanage des structures formelles du droit ou des mécanismes +administratifs. Elle peut surgir dans les interstices d'un collectif, +dans le pli d'un rituel, dans l'épaisseur d'une adresse improvisée, dans +la densité d'une discussion entre pairs. Ce qui fait scène, ce n'est ni +le statut de l'arène ni le nom de l'institution : c'est la possibilité +concrète pour une régulation de se rendre visible à partir de ce qu'elle +a produit, pour un sujet d'y accéder, d'y parler, d'y être entendu, et +pour l'ordre d'y être infléchi. La morphologie archicrative s'apparente +à une grammaire topologique de la requalification, non à une typologie +stricte des lieux. -Ainsi, une commission de médiation, une plateforme d’objection publique, un cercle d’écoute informel dans un foyer d’accueil, une réunion de colocataires débattant d’un conflit latent, une restitution mémorielle dans une communauté autochtone, une lettre ouverte collective au sein d’un collectif militant ou encore un forum numérique de désaccords argumentés — tous ces espaces, hétérogènes dans leur forme, peuvent, pour peu qu’ils permettent la traversée des cinq fonctions critiques — *accès, suspension, comparution, réversibilité, mémoire* — opérer comme scènes effectives d’archicration. +Ainsi, une commission de médiation, une plateforme d'objection publique, +un cercle d'écoute informel dans un foyer d'accueil, une réunion de +colocataires débattant d'un conflit latent, une restitution mémorielle +dans une communauté autochtone, une lettre ouverte collective au sein +d'un collectif militant ou encore un forum numérique de désaccords +argumentés — tous ces espaces, hétérogènes dans leur forme, peuvent, +pour peu qu'ils permettent la traversée des cinq fonctions critiques — *accès, suspension, comparution, réversibilité, mémoire* — opérer +comme scènes effectives d'archicration. -Mais cette possibilité, toujours précaire, est sans cesse exposée à des dynamiques de neutralisation. L’histoire et le présent des régulations montrent combien la scène peut être mise en échec sans être supprimée, dévitalisée sans être abolie, réduite à l’apparence sans plus rien faire tenir. Ce sont ces formes dégradées ou détournées de l’archicration que nous devons maintenant affronter, non pour les cataloguer, mais pour en diagnostiquer les écarts morphologiques. Car ce n’est pas l’absence de scène qui est ici en cause, mais la perversion de sa forme, son épuisement par saturation, son retournement cynique ou sa dissolution dans le silence différé. Ce sont autant de figures, insidieuses ou frontales, de ce que nous appellerons désarchicration, un désamorçage de l’archicration. +Mais cette possibilité, toujours précaire, est sans cesse exposée à des +dynamiques de neutralisation. L'histoire et le présent des régulations +montrent combien la scène peut être mise en échec sans être supprimée, +dévitalisée sans être abolie, réduite à l'apparence sans plus rien faire +tenir. Ce sont ces formes dégradées ou détournées de l'archicration que +nous devons maintenant affronter, non pour les cataloguer, mais pour en +diagnostiquer les écarts morphologiques. Car ce n'est pas l'absence de +scène qui est ici en cause, mais la perversion de sa forme, son +épuisement par saturation, son retournement cynique ou sa dissolution +dans le silence différé. Ce sont autant de figures, insidieuses ou +frontales, de ce que nous appellerons désarchicration, un désamorçage de +l'archicration. -Il y a d’abord les *scènes creuses*, où tout semble en place — protocole, procédure, façade d’écoute — mais où rien de substantiel ne peut advenir. Le langage est permis, l’expression autorisée, l’interpellation recevable en droit, mais aucune transformation n’est rendu possible. Le sujet parle, mais l’effet régulateur continue sa course, indifférent à ce qui est dit. Ces scènes ne suspendent pas, ne comparent pas, ne mémorisent pas : elles simulent l’archicration. Elles produisent une figuration vidée d’enjeux, un artefact critique, un rituel sans puissance. Ainsi, dans certaines consultations publiques sur des projets d’infrastructure — lignes ferroviaires, plans d’urbanisme, équipements industriels — les citoyens sont invités à s’exprimer *a posteriori*, une fois les décisions actées. Le protocole d’écoute est là, mais la *cratialité* est verrouillée en amont. L’*archicration* s’engouffre et s’effondre dans son propre simulacre. +Il y a d'abord les *scènes creuses*, où tout semble en place — protocole, procédure, façade d'écoute — mais où rien de substantiel ne +peut advenir. Le langage est permis, l'expression autorisée, +l'interpellation recevable en droit, mais aucune transformation n'est +rendu possible. Le sujet parle, mais l'effet régulateur continue sa +course, indifférent à ce qui est dit. Ces scènes ne suspendent pas, ne +comparent pas, ne mémorisent pas : elles simulent l'archicration. Elles +produisent une figuration vidée d'enjeux, un artefact critique, un +rituel sans puissance. Ainsi, dans certaines consultations publiques sur +des projets d'infrastructure — lignes ferroviaires, plans d'urbanisme, +équipements industriels — les citoyens sont invités à s'exprimer *a +posteriori*, une fois les décisions actées. Le protocole d'écoute est +là, mais la *cratialité* est verrouillée en amont. L'*archicration* +s'engouffre et s'effondre dans son propre simulacre. -Il y a ensuite les *scènes retournées*, plus pernicieuses encore. Celles-ci ne se contentent pas de neutraliser la critique, elles l’utilisent contre elle-même. Le pouvoir y laisse parler non pour entendre, mais pour disqualifier. Il accueille la plainte pour mieux la réduire à un excès, une irrationalité, une pathologie ou un bruit. C’est la forme cynique de la scène : elle se donne comme lieu d’exposition, mais renforce l’ordre qu’elle prétend mettre à l’épreuve. L’interpellation devient preuve de perturbation, la parole devient symptôme. Dans certaines entreprises, institutions éducatives ou organisations politiques, les dispositifs d’écoute post-crise transforment les plaintes en atteintes à l’image ou en preuves d’indiscipline. L’interlocution devient surveillance, la scène devient outil de consolidation du pouvoir. +Il y a ensuite les *scènes retournées*, plus pernicieuses encore. +Celles-ci ne se contentent pas de neutraliser la critique, elles +l'utilisent contre elle-même. Le pouvoir y laisse parler non pour +entendre, mais pour disqualifier. Il accueille la plainte pour mieux la +réduire à un excès, une irrationalité, une pathologie ou un bruit. C'est +la forme cynique de la scène : elle se donne comme lieu d'exposition, +mais renforce l'ordre qu'elle prétend mettre à l'épreuve. +L'interpellation devient preuve de perturbation, la parole devient +symptôme. Dans certaines entreprises, institutions éducatives ou +organisations politiques, les dispositifs d'écoute post-crise +transforment les plaintes en atteintes à l'image ou en preuves +d'indiscipline. L'interlocution devient surveillance, la scène devient +outil de consolidation du pouvoir. -Autre figure : la *scène saturée*. Ici, le dysfonctionnement ne vient pas de l’absence, mais de l’excès non médié. Trop d’accès, pas de filtrage, pas de traduction. Trop de voix, pas d’écoute structurée. Trop d’injonctions, pas de temporalité. La scène devient invivable : le volume d’interpellation y déborde toute capacité de traitement, la comparution s’y dilue dans le chaos, la réversibilité devient illisible. Ce sont les grandes plateformes numériques d’évaluation, les forums de “libre expression”, ou encore certaines réunions communautaires où tout le monde parle sans qu’aucune écoute mutuelle ne tienne. La scène donne lieu au vacarme. Le seuil d’entrée s’avère ouvert, mais l’agencement archicratique se voit détruit. La critique y meurt de sa propre profusion non canalisée. +Autre figure : la *scène saturée*. Ici, le dysfonctionnement ne vient +pas de l'absence, mais de l'excès non médié. Trop d'accès, pas de +filtrage, pas de traduction. Trop de voix, pas d'écoute structurée. Trop +d'injonctions, pas de temporalité. La scène devient invivable : le +volume d'interpellation y déborde toute capacité de traitement, la +comparution s'y dilue dans le chaos, la réversibilité devient illisible. +Ce sont les grandes plateformes numériques d'évaluation, les forums de +"libre expression", ou encore certaines réunions communautaires où tout +le monde parle sans qu'aucune écoute mutuelle ne tienne. La scène donne +lieu au vacarme. Le seuil d'entrée s'avère ouvert, mais l'agencement +archicratique se voit détruit. La critique y meurt de sa propre +profusion non canalisée. -Plus troublante encore est la *scène spectrale*. Là, il ne s’agit plus d’un simulacre d’écoute ni d’un excès d’expression mais d’un ajournement indéfini. Le sujet n’est pas exclu ; il demeure suspendu. On lui dit : “bientôt”, “encore un peu de patience”, “votre demande est en cours de traitement”. Mais celui-ci ne vient jamais. La scène est invoquée, toujours repoussée, jamais tenue. C’est le règne de la régulation par la latence, où le temps devient instrument d’usure et d’effacement sans brutalité. Dans les politiques d’asile, dans les systèmes de demande de logement, dans les chaînes d’approbation administratives, on trouve ce type de *scènes spectrales* : le dossier est bien présent, mais ne trouve jamais place dans la scène. Ce qui est produit alors est une suspension sans mémoire, une attente à comparution différée jusqu’à l’inopérance, une adresse privée de réponse effectivement opposable. Le différé se mue dès lors en forme de pouvoir. +Plus troublante encore est la *scène spectrale*. Là, il ne s'agit plus +d'un simulacre d'écoute ni d'un excès d'expression mais d'un ajournement +indéfini. Le sujet n'est pas exclu ; il demeure suspendu. On lui dit : +"bientôt", "encore un peu de patience", "votre demande est en cours de +traitement". Mais celui-ci ne vient jamais. La scène est invoquée, +toujours repoussée, jamais tenue. C'est le règne de la régulation par la +latence, où le temps devient instrument d'usure et d'effacement sans +brutalité. Dans les politiques d'asile, dans les systèmes de demande de +logement, dans les chaînes d'approbation administratives, on trouve ce +type de *scènes spectrales* : le dossier est bien présent, mais ne +trouve jamais place dans la scène. Ce qui est produit alors est une +suspension sans mémoire, une attente à comparution différée jusqu'à +l'inopérance, une adresse privée de réponse effectivement opposable. Le +différé se mue dès lors en forme de pouvoir. -Face à cela, il existe des régulations qui s’ajustent sans jamais organiser de nouvelles scènes. Ce sont les *formes post-interpellatives*. L’ordre y intègre la mémoire de scènes passées — plaintes, mobilisations, controverses — pour reconfigurer silencieusement ses opérations. On peut compter dans cette catégorie : un algorithme modifié sans annonce, un seuil déplacé sans justification, une interface ajustée après une vague de critiques. Il n’y a pas de comparution, mais une mémoire agissante. Ce n’est pas une archicration au sens strict, mais une archicratialisation par effet de sédimentation critique. Ce régime peut être fécond, mais aussi inquiétant, car il soustrait à la vue des concernés les litiges et les dérives établis : *qui contrôle que l’ajustement a bien eu lieu ?, qui mémorise la scène absente ?, qui peut rejouer l’interpellation si elle reste sans forme ?* La critique y est intégrée, donne lieu à évolution d’arcalités et de cratialités, mais la polémique est désamorcée. +Face à cela, il existe des régulations qui s'ajustent sans jamais +organiser de nouvelles scènes. Ce sont les *formes +post-interpellatives*. L'ordre y intègre la mémoire de scènes passées — plaintes, mobilisations, controverses — pour reconfigurer +silencieusement ses opérations. On peut compter dans cette catégorie : +un algorithme modifié sans annonce, un seuil déplacé sans justification, +une interface ajustée après une vague de critiques. Il n'y a pas de +comparution, mais une mémoire agissante. Ce n'est pas une archicration +au sens strict, mais une archicratialisation par effet de sédimentation +critique. Ce régime peut être fécond, mais aussi inquiétant, car il +soustrait à la vue des concernés les litiges et les dérives établis : +*qui contrôle que l'ajustement a bien eu lieu ?, qui mémorise la scène +absente ?, qui peut rejouer l'interpellation si elle reste sans forme ?* +La critique y est intégrée, donne lieu à évolution d'arcalités et de +cratialités, mais la polémique est désamorcée. -Par *archicratialisation*, nous désignons ce régime post-interpellatif par lequel une régulation intègre la mémoire d’épreuves passées (plaintes, controverses, mobilisations) sans pour autant rouvrir de scène effective : les critiques sédimentent et se transmutent silencieusement en ajustements d’*arcalité* (fondements, critères, axiomes) et de *cratialité* (procédures, seuils, algorithmes, interfaces), sans comparution véritablement praticable, sans publicité opposable, sans délai contradictoire nouvellement institué et opérant. L’*archicratialisation* n’est donc pas l’*archicration* (qui expose et oppose), mais son après-coup opératoire : une auto-réforme qui peut corriger, parfois avec finesse, tout en déplaçant hors scène le litige qui l’a rendue nécessaire ; d’où son ambivalence. Elle peut être féconde si elle demeure traçable et ré-ouvrable, mais devient inquiétante si elle neutralise la polémique en retirant aux concernés la possibilité d’une réinterpellation opposable. +Par *archicratialisation*, nous désignons ce régime post-interpellatif +par lequel une régulation intègre la mémoire d'épreuves passées +(plaintes, controverses, mobilisations) sans pour autant rouvrir de +scène effective : les critiques sédimentent et se transmutent +silencieusement en ajustements d'*arcalité* (fondements, critères, +axiomes) et de *cratialité* (procédures, seuils, algorithmes, +interfaces), sans comparution véritablement praticable, sans publicité +opposable, sans délai contradictoire nouvellement institué et opérant. +L'*archicratialisation* n'est donc pas l'*archicration* (qui expose et +oppose), mais son après-coup opératoire : une auto-réforme qui peut +corriger, parfois avec finesse, tout en déplaçant hors scène le litige +qui l'a rendue nécessaire ; d'où son ambivalence. Elle peut être féconde +si elle demeure traçable et ré-ouvrable, mais devient inquiétante si +elle neutralise la polémique en retirant aux concernés la possibilité +d'une réinterpellation opposable. -Enfin, il existe ce que nous nommons les *contre-scènes auto-organisées*, ou *pré-archicrations*. Là, ce n’est plus l’ordre institué qui ouvre une scène, mais les sujets eux-mêmes qui la fabriquent, à même leurs expériences. Ce sont des collectifs d’écoute mutuelle, des cercles d’entraide communautaire, des réunions de colocataires qui instituent des modalités de parole, de suspension, de reconnaissance, de réparation. Ces scènes ne contestent pas toujours l’ordre en bloc : elles déploient un à-côté, un écart, une grammaire marginale de la régulation. Elles tissent leurs propres conditions de comparution, de mémoire, de reprise — et parfois, dans un second temps, elles viennent frapper à la porte de l’institution pour l’obliger à s’ajuster. +Enfin, il existe ce que nous nommons les *contre-scènes +auto-organisées*, ou *pré-archicrations*. Là, ce n'est plus l'ordre +institué qui ouvre une scène, mais les sujets eux-mêmes qui la +fabriquent, à même leurs expériences. Ce sont des collectifs d'écoute +mutuelle, des cercles d'entraide communautaire, des réunions de +colocataires qui instituent des modalités de parole, de suspension, de +reconnaissance, de réparation. Ces scènes ne contestent pas toujours +l'ordre en bloc : elles déploient un à-côté, un écart, une grammaire +marginale de la régulation. Elles tissent leurs propres conditions de +comparution, de mémoire, de reprise — et parfois, dans un second +temps, elles viennent frapper à la porte de l'institution pour l'obliger +à s'ajuster. -Ce sont ces formes, dans leur diversité, leur fragilité, leur puissance critique, que le paradigme archicratique permet de rendre lisibles. Non pour les classer selon une échelle de valeur, mais pour en diagnostiquer les agencements différés, les écarts morphologiques et les potentiels de reprise. Car ce n’est jamais la forme qui garantit la fonction. Une salle d’audience peut être cynique ; une cuisine partagée peut être une scène ; un formulaire numérique peut être une clôture ; une lettre manuscrite peut ouvrir une mémoire. +Ce sont ces formes, dans leur diversité, leur fragilité, leur puissance +critique, que le paradigme archicratique permet de rendre lisibles. Non +pour les classer selon une échelle de valeur, mais pour en diagnostiquer +les agencements différés, les écarts morphologiques et les potentiels de +reprise. Car ce n'est jamais la forme qui garantit la fonction. Une +salle d'audience peut être cynique ; une cuisine partagée peut être une +scène ; un formulaire numérique peut être une clôture ; une lettre +manuscrite peut ouvrir une mémoire. -Loin d’être anecdotiques, ces morphologies périphériques sont cruciales pour comprendre l’*archicration*. Elles montrent qu’il s’agit d’un champ dynamique où se croisent scènes instituées, scènes dégradées, scènes ajournées, scènes latérales et scènes instituantes. Elles révèlent aussi la plasticité historique des *formes archicratiques* : ce qui, hier, relevait d’un tribunal peut aujourd’hui se déployer dans une interface ; ce qui, hier, était confiné dans un rituel peut se manifester dans un forum numérique ; ce qui, hier, était réservé à l’État peut être organisé par des communautés elles-mêmes. +Loin d'être anecdotiques, ces morphologies périphériques sont cruciales +pour comprendre l'*archicration*. Elles montrent qu'il s'agit d'un champ +dynamique où se croisent scènes instituées, scènes dégradées, scènes +ajournées, scènes latérales et scènes instituantes. Elles révèlent aussi +la plasticité historique des *formes archicratiques* : ce qui, hier, +relevait d'un tribunal peut aujourd'hui se déployer dans une interface ; +ce qui, hier, était confiné dans un rituel peut se manifester dans un +forum numérique ; ce qui, hier, était réservé à l'État peut être +organisé par des communautés elles-mêmes. -Pour comprendre cette diversité, il faut revenir à la morphologie critique de la scène : *quelles fonctions tiennent ensemble ? quelles fonctions se disloquent ? quelles fonctions se déplacent ailleurs ?* C’est en répondant à ces questions qu’on peut situer chaque configuration, et non en présumant d’avance sa valeur parce qu’elle serait « officielle » ou « informelle ». Une *archicration* peut être modeste, mais bien réelle ; une instance solennelle peut être spectaculaire tout en restant parfaitement creuse. L’analyse morphologique permet d’éviter l’illusion de l’échelle et du prestige institutionnel : ce qui compte, avant tout, c’est la *consistance opératoire*. +Pour comprendre cette diversité, il faut revenir à la morphologie +critique de la scène : *quelles fonctions tiennent ensemble ? quelles +fonctions se disloquent ? quelles fonctions se déplacent ailleurs ?* +C'est en répondant à ces questions qu'on peut situer chaque +configuration, et non en présumant d'avance sa valeur parce qu'elle +serait « officielle » ou « informelle ». Une *archicration* peut être +modeste, mais bien réelle ; une instance solennelle peut être +spectaculaire tout en restant parfaitement creuse. L'analyse +morphologique permet d'éviter l'illusion de l'échelle et du prestige +institutionnel : ce qui compte, avant tout, c'est la *consistance +opératoire*. -Ce déplacement du regard permet aussi de comprendre que l’*archicration* ne se limite pas à corriger des opérations individuelles. Elle peut devenir une force de transformation progressive du régime lui-même, non par décret, mais par mémoire cumulative et ajustement continu. Une scène de recours répétée, même modeste, peut finir par transformer un script ; une contre-scène latérale (*pré-archicrative*) peut, en se stabilisant, obliger l’institution à ouvrir un canal officiel ; une *archicration* *spectrale* peut, sous la pression, se muer en scène effective. L’*archicration* est ainsi un processus polymorphe aux multiples lieux, elle est la modalité par laquelle l’ordre apprend — ou n’apprend pas — de ce qu’il fait. +Ce déplacement du regard permet aussi de comprendre que l'*archicration* +ne se limite pas à corriger des opérations individuelles. Elle peut +devenir une force de transformation progressive du régime lui-même, non +par décret, mais par mémoire cumulative et ajustement continu. Une scène +de recours répétée, même modeste, peut finir par transformer un script ; +une contre-scène latérale (*pré-archicrative*) peut, en se stabilisant, +obliger l'institution à ouvrir un canal officiel ; une *archicration* +*spectrale* peut, sous la pression, se muer en scène effective. +L'*archicration* est ainsi un processus polymorphe aux multiples lieux, +elle est la modalité par laquelle l'ordre apprend — ou n'apprend pas — de ce qu'il fait. -Dans ce sens, on peut comprendre qu’elle soit le troisième pôle du paradigme archicratique : elle ne vient ni avant ni après, elle suture le fondement à l’opération en les exposant à l’épreuve de leurs effets. Là où l’*arcalité* institue un ordre, là où la *cratialité* l’exécute, l’*archicration* oblige à réentendre ce qui a été produit et à en tirer mémoire et ajustement. Sans ce pli critique, l’ordre devient bloc. Avec lui, l’ordre devient structure vivante, susceptible d’apprentissage et d’évolution. +Dans ce sens, on peut comprendre qu'elle soit le troisième pôle du +paradigme archicratique : elle ne vient ni avant ni après, elle suture +le fondement à l'opération en les exposant à l'épreuve de leurs effets. +Là où l'*arcalité* institue un ordre, là où la *cratialité* l'exécute, +l'*archicration* oblige à réentendre ce qui a été produit et à en tirer +mémoire et ajustement. Sans ce pli critique, l'ordre devient bloc. Avec +lui, l'ordre devient structure vivante, susceptible d'apprentissage et +d'évolution. -Car ce que révèle l’*archicration*, au-delà de son efficacité locale, c’est sa capacité à faire muter la régulation elle-même. Non pas en l’abattant, ni en la contournant, mais en la forçant à se redire à partir de ce qu’elle affecte. Chaque *scène archicrative* bien tenue est un site de recomposition des régimes régulateurs. Elle agit comme opérateur de transformation différentielle : ce qui y est produit n’est ni un retour en arrière, ni une purge symbolique, mais un nouveau seuil de configuration du pouvoir régulateur, où le geste normatif ne peut plus se répéter à l’identique. +Car ce que révèle l'*archicration*, au-delà de son efficacité locale, +c'est sa capacité à faire muter la régulation elle-même. Non pas en +l'abattant, ni en la contournant, mais en la forçant à se redire à +partir de ce qu'elle affecte. Chaque *scène archicrative* bien tenue est +un site de recomposition des régimes régulateurs. Elle agit comme +opérateur de transformation différentielle : ce qui y est produit n'est +ni un retour en arrière, ni une purge symbolique, mais un nouveau seuil +de configuration du pouvoir régulateur, où le geste normatif ne peut +plus se répéter à l'identique. -Ce potentiel transformatif est manifeste dans les grandes reconfigurations historiques. L’invention des formes juridictionnelles modernes — celles qui instituent l’audience contradictoire, la suspension des effets, la production publique de motifs et la mémoire de la décision — ne résulte pas d’une décision rationnelle abstraite, mais de l’accumulation de tensions, de scènes conflictuelles, de demandes de comparution, qui ont obligé les régimes de justice à se reconfigurer depuis les points de friction entre l’ordre et ses effets. +Ce potentiel transformatif est manifeste dans les grandes +reconfigurations historiques. L'invention des formes juridictionnelles +modernes — celles qui instituent l'audience contradictoire, la +suspension des effets, la production publique de motifs et la mémoire de +la décision — ne résulte pas d'une décision rationnelle abstraite, +mais de l'accumulation de tensions, de scènes conflictuelles, de +demandes de comparution, qui ont obligé les régimes de justice à se +reconfigurer depuis les points de friction entre l'ordre et ses effets. -La même logique vaut pour l’émergence des droits sociaux : c’est parce que de multiples scènes, locales, informelles ou institutionnalisées, ont porté sur la scène publique les effets inacceptables de certaines régulations économiques ou sociétales que des inflexions, puis des basculements d’*arcalité* ont été rendus pensables — jusqu’à produire, dans certains contextes, une refondation normative, voire — même si plus exceptionnelle — une assemblée constituante. +La même logique vaut pour l'émergence des droits sociaux : c'est parce +que de multiples scènes, locales, informelles ou institutionnalisées, +ont porté sur la scène publique les effets inacceptables de certaines +régulations économiques ou sociétales que des inflexions, puis des +basculements d'*arcalité* ont été rendus pensables — jusqu'à produire, +dans certains contextes, une refondation normative, voire — même si +plus exceptionnelle — une assemblée constituante. -À l’époque contemporaine, le régime numérique constitue un nouveau défi pour l’*archicratie*. L’automatisation massive des *chaînes cratiales*, la désintermédiation des processus décisionnels, l’interopérabilité de bases de données, la fluidification continue des effets régulateurs tendent à effacer les conditions morphologiques de la *scène archicrative*. L’on peut être affecté par un algorithme de sélection, un déclenchement automatisé de droit ou une suspension de service sans jamais savoir où formuler une objection, à qui l’adresser, ni selon quel protocole la voir entendue. Ce ne sont pas uniquement l’*arcalité* et la *cratialité* qui deviennent opaques, c’est l’*archicration* elle-même qui devient impensable faute de zone d’ombres dans la complexité : aucune scène ne s’ouvre, aucun délai ne suspend, aucune trace ne subsiste. Ce que l’on appelle parfois « *gouvernance algorithmique *» peut ainsi masquer un effacement généralisé de la capacité critique adressable. L’ordre agit sans se laisser interpeller, ou tout au mieux à la marge. +À l'époque contemporaine, le régime numérique constitue un nouveau défi +pour l'*archicratie*. L'automatisation massive des *chaînes cratiales*, +la désintermédiation des processus décisionnels, l'interopérabilité de +bases de données, la fluidification continue des effets régulateurs +tendent à effacer les conditions morphologiques de la *scène +archicrative*. L'on peut être affecté par un algorithme de sélection, un +déclenchement automatisé de droit ou une suspension de service sans +jamais savoir où formuler une objection, à qui l'adresser, ni selon quel +protocole la voir entendue. Ce ne sont pas uniquement l'*arcalité* et la +*cratialité* qui deviennent opaques, c'est l'*archicration* elle-même +qui devient impensable faute de zone d'ombres dans la complexité : +aucune scène ne s'ouvre, aucun délai ne suspend, aucune trace ne +subsiste. Ce que l'on appelle parfois « *gouvernance algorithmique *» +peut ainsi masquer un effacement généralisé de la capacité critique +adressable. L'ordre agit sans se laisser interpeller, ou tout au mieux à +la marge. -Mais ce même régime engendre ses contre-mouvements. À mesure que les scènes se referment, de nouvelles formes d’*archicration* émergent dans les intersections et les interstices : collectifs de lutte contre les injustices algorithmiques, plateformes de transparence participative, dispositifs d’audit civique, espaces de révision décentralisée des classements ou des seuils. Ces configurations, encore fragiles, montrent que la *tension archicrative* n’est pas réductible à une forme canonique : elle réinvente sans cesse ses conditions, ses modalités, ses agencements. Dans certains cas, c’est une nouvelle *arcalité* qui surgit depuis la scène : le droit à l’explicitation algorithmique, la reconnaissance du préjudice systémique, l’obligation de justification des décisions automatisées. Dans d’autres cas, c’est la *cratialité* qui se trouve reprogrammée : délai intégré, canal de recours incorporé, scénarisation de la transparence. La scène, ici, n’est plus une réponse — elle se découvre moteur d’innovation régulatrice. +Mais ce même régime engendre ses contre-mouvements. À mesure que les +scènes se referment, de nouvelles formes d'*archicration* émergent dans +les intersections et les interstices : collectifs de lutte contre les +injustices algorithmiques, plateformes de transparence participative, +dispositifs d'audit civique, espaces de révision décentralisée des +classements ou des seuils. Ces configurations, encore fragiles, montrent +que la *tension archicrative* n'est pas réductible à une forme canonique +: elle réinvente sans cesse ses conditions, ses modalités, ses +agencements. Dans certains cas, c'est une nouvelle *arcalité* qui surgit +depuis la scène : le droit à l'explicitation algorithmique, la +reconnaissance du préjudice systémique, l'obligation de justification +des décisions automatisées. Dans d'autres cas, c'est la *cratialité* qui +se trouve reprogrammée : délai intégré, canal de recours incorporé, +scénarisation de la transparence. La scène, ici, n'est plus une réponse — elle se découvre moteur d'innovation régulatrice. -Cette dynamique, loin d’être contingente, constitue la structure évolutive du paradigme archicratique. Car celui-ci ne repose ni sur un fondement immobile, ni sur une opération figée, mais sur une capacité intrinsèque à se réformer depuis ce qu’il a produit. L’archicration est le principe morphogénétique par lequel les régulations changent, s’ajustent et se recomposent. Elle ne suspend pas la régulation : elle la réoriente depuis ses propres contradictions. Elle oblige la régulation à reprendre forme depuis l’expérience située +Cette dynamique, loin d'être contingente, constitue la structure +évolutive du paradigme archicratique. Car celui-ci ne repose ni sur un +fondement immobile, ni sur une opération figée, mais sur une capacité +intrinsèque à se réformer depuis ce qu'il a produit. L'archicration est +le principe morphogénétique par lequel les régulations changent, +s'ajustent et se recomposent. Elle ne suspend pas la régulation : elle +la réoriente depuis ses propres contradictions. Elle oblige la +régulation à reprendre forme depuis l'expérience située -Dès lors, on ne peut pas la traiter comme un supplément institutionnel, un adjuvant procédural ou un surplus de vigilance démocratique. Elle est ce sans quoi il n’y a pas de régulation viable dans la durée, c’est-à-dire, capable de se maintenir dans le temps non par inertie, mais par capacité interne de reconfiguration à partir de ses propres tensions évolutives. Un régime qui ne tolère aucune *scène d’archicration* se condamne à l’opacité ou à la rupture. Un régime qui les tolère sans les articuler se condamne à l’usure ou à l’impuissance. Un régime qui les fabrique, les soutient et les transforme peut *a contrario* tenir dans le temps, non pas malgré ses tensions, mais à travers elles. +Dès lors, on ne peut pas la traiter comme un supplément institutionnel, +un adjuvant procédural ou un surplus de vigilance démocratique. Elle est +ce sans quoi il n'y a pas de régulation viable dans la durée, +c'est-à-dire, capable de se maintenir dans le temps non par inertie, +mais par capacité interne de reconfiguration à partir de ses propres +tensions évolutives. Un régime qui ne tolère aucune *scène +d'archicration* se condamne à l'opacité ou à la rupture. Un régime qui +les tolère sans les articuler se condamne à l'usure ou à l'impuissance. +Un régime qui les fabrique, les soutient et les transforme peut *a +contrario* tenir dans le temps, non pas malgré ses tensions, mais à +travers elles. -C’est à cette condition qu’il devient possible de comprendre autrement l’histoire des régimes régulateurs : non comme succession de modèles de pouvoir, mais comme variation des *formes d’archicration* rendues possibles, empêchées, dégradées, refondées ou rénovées. C’est dans cette perspective que s’ouvrent les chapitres suivants. Ils retraceront comment, depuis les premières co-viabilités instituées jusqu’aux dispositifs techno-algorithmiques contemporains, les formes d’*archicration* ont déterminé — autant que les normes et les opérations — les trajectoires, les mutations et les tensions des régulations historiques. +C'est à cette condition qu'il devient possible de comprendre autrement +l'histoire des régimes régulateurs : non comme succession de modèles de +pouvoir, mais comme variation des *formes d'archicration* rendues +possibles, empêchées, dégradées, refondées ou rénovées. C'est dans cette +perspective que s'ouvrent les chapitres suivants. Ils retraceront +comment, depuis les premières co-viabilités instituées jusqu'aux +dispositifs techno-algorithmiques contemporains, les formes +d'*archicration* ont déterminé — autant que les normes et les +opérations — les trajectoires, les mutations et les tensions des +régulations historiques. -Elle est ce qui empêche l’ordre de se refermer dans la tautologie de ses propres justifications. Elle garantit qu’un effet puisse encore produire un retour, qu’une norme puisse être reprise depuis celles et ceux qu’elle a affectés. Non comme ornement tardif, mais comme seuil de reformulation : la forme même par laquelle le pouvoir se rend à nouveau adressable. Elle n’est pas un luxe ; elle est indispensable pour rendre possible l’habitation critique d’un monde commun. +Elle est ce qui empêche l'ordre de se refermer dans la tautologie de ses +propres justifications. Elle garantit qu'un effet puisse encore produire +un retour, qu'une norme puisse être reprise depuis celles et ceux +qu'elle a affectés. Non comme ornement tardif, mais comme seuil de +reformulation : la forme même par laquelle le pouvoir se rend à nouveau +adressable. Elle n'est pas un luxe ; elle est indispensable pour rendre +possible l'habitation critique d'un monde commun. ## **Conclusion du chapitre 1 — La théorie archicratique : régulation politique, plasticité critique et scène de requalification** -Cette conclusion ne referme pas une doctrine ; elle resserre les conditions sous lesquelles le paradigme archicratique peut valoir comme cadre d’intelligibilité critique du politique. Il ne s’ajoute ni comme typologie supplémentaire, ni comme méthode normative de classement des régimes ; il propose un outillage morphologique pour rendre lisibles les formes concrètes de la régulation dans l’articulation située de l’arcalité, de la cratialité et de l’archicration. +Cette conclusion ne referme pas une doctrine ; elle resserre les +conditions sous lesquelles le paradigme archicratique peut valoir comme +cadre d'intelligibilité critique du politique. Il ne s'ajoute ni comme +typologie supplémentaire, ni comme méthode normative de classement des +régimes ; il propose un outillage morphologique pour rendre lisibles les +formes concrètes de la régulation dans l'articulation située de +l'arcalité, de la cratialité et de l'archicration. -Il importe toutefois d’en préciser le statut exact. Le paradigme archicratique n’est ni purement descriptif, au sens où il se bornerait à enregistrer des formes données de régulation, ni directement normatif, au sens où il proposerait un modèle substantiel du bon ordre politique. Son régime propre est critique-structural. Il est descriptif lorsqu’il reconstruit les modes d’articulation entre fondement, opération et épreuve ; critique lorsqu’il met au jour leurs désajustements, leurs captures ou leurs formes d’oblitération ; normatif enfin, mais au sens minimal seulement, lorsqu’il rapporte ces configurations à une exigence de co-viabilité entendue non comme idéal de réconciliation, mais comme seuil d’habitabilité des régulations pour celles et ceux qu’elles affectent. +Il importe toutefois d'en préciser le statut exact. Le paradigme +archicratique n'est ni purement descriptif, au sens où il se bornerait à +enregistrer des formes données de régulation, ni directement normatif, +au sens où il proposerait un modèle substantiel du bon ordre politique. +Son régime propre est critique-structural. Il est descriptif lorsqu'il +reconstruit les modes d'articulation entre fondement, opération et +épreuve ; critique lorsqu'il met au jour leurs désajustements, leurs +captures ou leurs formes d'oblitération ; normatif enfin, mais au sens +minimal seulement, lorsqu'il rapporte ces configurations à une exigence +de co-viabilité entendue non comme idéal de réconciliation, mais comme +seuil d'habitabilité des régulations pour celles et ceux qu'elles +affectent. -Cette normativité minimale n’ajoute pas un principe moral extérieur aux phénomènes étudiés ; elle explicite la condition même sous laquelle une régulation peut être dite politiquement tenable sans reconduire, sous couvert de gestion, des asymétries soustraites à toute reprise. +Cette normativité minimale n'ajoute pas un principe moral extérieur aux +phénomènes étudiés ; elle explicite la condition même sous laquelle une +régulation peut être dite politiquement tenable sans reconduire, sous +couvert de gestion, des asymétries soustraites à toute reprise. -Le paradigme archicratique n’impose pas une grille préexistante à des réalités déjà constituées ; il permet d’analyser, depuis leurs tensions propres, les manières dont ces réalités se composent, se désarticulent, se reconfigurent. En ce sens, il relève d’une dynamique transductive, au sens où chaque régulation est saisie non comme un objet figé, mais comme une configuration en devenir, traversée de forces, de seuils, de mémoires et de requalifications. La transduction, ici, ne désigne pas un raisonnement par analogie (au sens psychologique), mais un processus d’individuation progressive, au contact des tensions internes d’un système. +Le paradigme archicratique n'impose pas une grille préexistante à des +réalités déjà constituées ; il permet d'analyser, depuis leurs tensions +propres, les manières dont ces réalités se composent, se désarticulent, +se reconfigurent. En ce sens, il relève d'une dynamique transductive, au +sens où chaque régulation est saisie non comme un objet figé, mais comme +une configuration en devenir, traversée de forces, de seuils, de +mémoires et de requalifications. La transduction, ici, ne désigne pas un +raisonnement par analogie (au sens psychologique), mais un processus +d'individuation progressive, au contact des tensions internes d'un +système. -Ainsi, lorsque notre modèle est appliqué à un rituel de justice réparatrice, à une procédure administrative, à un dispositif numérique ou à une organisation communautaire, il met en lumière les prises effectives qui structurent la régulation. Là où l’*arcalité* échappe, il identifie l’absence de mémoire opposable ; là où la *cratialité* se ferme, il détecte la saturation opératoire ; là où l’*archicration* fait défaut, il rend visible la clôture de l’adresse ou l’impossibilité de comparution. Ce qu’il révèle, ce ne sont pas des fautes de conformité à une norme idéale, mais des déséquilibres morphologiques qui affectent la viabilité du régime. +Ainsi, lorsque notre modèle est appliqué à un rituel de justice +réparatrice, à une procédure administrative, à un dispositif numérique +ou à une organisation communautaire, il met en lumière les prises +effectives qui structurent la régulation. Là où l'*arcalité* échappe, il +identifie l'absence de mémoire opposable ; là où la *cratialité* se +ferme, il détecte la saturation opératoire ; là où l'*archicration* fait +défaut, il rend visible la clôture de l'adresse ou l'impossibilité de +comparution. Ce qu'il révèle, ce ne sont pas des fautes de conformité à +une norme idéale, mais des déséquilibres morphologiques qui affectent la +viabilité du régime. -Cette posture d’analyse n’a rien de relativiste. Elle repose au contraire sur une discipline critique rigoureuse, structurée par des critères de différenciation et de lisibilité : *peut-on identifier un fondement adressable ? une opération attribuable ? une scène praticable ? Peut-on situer les principes, les actions, les effets, les affects, les seuils, les temporalités, les réversibilités ?* Ce sont ces questions qui permettent de situer un régime dans sa dynamique propre, sans le réduire à une étiquette politique figée, ni l’absorber dans un jugement moral sommaire. +Cette posture d'analyse n'a rien de relativiste. Elle repose au +contraire sur une discipline critique rigoureuse, structurée par des +critères de différenciation et de lisibilité : *peut-on identifier un +fondement adressable ? une opération attribuable ? une scène praticable +? Peut-on situer les principes, les actions, les effets, les affects, +les seuils, les temporalités, les réversibilités ?* Ce sont ces +questions qui permettent de situer un régime dans sa dynamique propre, +sans le réduire à une étiquette politique figée, ni l'absorber dans un +jugement moral sommaire. -Autrement dit, l’*archicratie* n’est pas une épistémologie totalisante, mais une opération topologique et morphogénétique : elle donne forme intelligible et située à ce qui, dans les régimes, restait occulté bien qu’étant agissant. Elle ne se contente pas de cartographier les régimes régulateurs : elle génère leur lisibilité, et donc leur contestation possible, en produisant un espace où les tensions peuvent être exposées, disputées et requalifiées. Ce qui la distingue alors d’une simple théorie descriptive ou normative, c’est son caractère constituant d’une scène d’analyse, d’un espace épistémique de reformulation. Elle est en ce sens une *archicration* de la régulation elle-même, autant qu’un paradigme de la régulation politique. +Autrement dit, l'*archicratie* n'est pas une épistémologie totalisante, +mais une opération topologique et morphogénétique : elle donne forme +intelligible et située à ce qui, dans les régimes, restait occulté bien +qu'étant agissant. Elle ne se contente pas de cartographier les régimes +régulateurs : elle génère leur lisibilité, et donc leur contestation +possible, en produisant un espace où les tensions peuvent être exposées, +disputées et requalifiées. Ce qui la distingue alors d'une simple +théorie descriptive ou normative, c'est son caractère constituant d'une +scène d'analyse, d'un espace épistémique de reformulation. Elle est en +ce sens une *archicration* de la régulation elle-même, autant qu'un +paradigme de la régulation politique. -Ce que permet cette intelligibilité transductive ne se réduit pas à la distinction entre des types de régimes ou au classement des formes de pouvoir. Elle introduit, au cœur même du concept de régulation, une capacité à se confronter à ses effets, à en évaluer les bienfaits et les méfaits, mais aussi à leurs conséquences, à se reconfigurer depuis ses points de tension et à tenir dans le temps à travers l’épreuve de ce qu’elle transforme. Ce que la pensée archicratique permet de saisir, c’est que toute régulation, pour être effectivement durable, doit être co-viable : c’est-à-dire, capable d’articuler son effectivité avec la possibilité d’être reprise, entendue, adressée et, *in fine*, transformée. Il n’y a pas d’ordre stable qui ne soit en même temps susceptible d’exposition — et potentiellement rectifiable — à partir de ses effets vécus. +Ce que permet cette intelligibilité transductive ne se réduit pas à la +distinction entre des types de régimes ou au classement des formes de +pouvoir. Elle introduit, au cœur même du concept de régulation, une +capacité à se confronter à ses effets, à en évaluer les bienfaits et les +méfaits, mais aussi à leurs conséquences, à se reconfigurer depuis ses +points de tension et à tenir dans le temps à travers l'épreuve de ce +qu'elle transforme. Ce que la pensée archicratique permet de saisir, +c'est que toute régulation, pour être effectivement durable, doit être +co-viable : c'est-à-dire, capable d'articuler son effectivité avec la +possibilité d'être reprise, entendue, adressée et, *in fine*, +transformée. Il n'y a pas d'ordre stable qui ne soit en même temps +susceptible d'exposition — et potentiellement rectifiable — à partir +de ses effets vécus. -Cette capacité de *co-viabilité* n’est ni une lubie démocratique, ni un supplément moral, ni un geste de bonne gouvernance. C’est une structure minimale d’habitabilité politique, que le paradigme archicratique identifie non comme une valeur, mais comme une condition morphologique fondamentale. Là où les paradigmes classiques du politique postulent une autorité souveraine, un contrat fondateur, une hiérarchie des normes ou une séparation des pouvoirs, le paradigme archicratique propose une topologie de la régulation située, structurée par ses prises différentielles, ses seuils critiques et ses scènes de reconfiguration qui permettent la viabilité. Il ne demande pas : « *qui décide ?* » ou « *quelle est la loi ?* », mais : « *comment tient cette régulation dans le temps, sous l’épreuve de ses propres effets ?* ». +Cette capacité de *co-viabilité* n'est ni une lubie démocratique, ni un +supplément moral, ni un geste de bonne gouvernance. C'est une structure +minimale d'habitabilité politique, que le paradigme archicratique +identifie non comme une valeur, mais comme une condition morphologique +fondamentale. Là où les paradigmes classiques du politique postulent une +autorité souveraine, un contrat fondateur, une hiérarchie des normes ou +une séparation des pouvoirs, le paradigme archicratique propose une +topologie de la régulation située, structurée par ses prises +différentielles, ses seuils critiques et ses scènes de reconfiguration +qui permettent la viabilité. Il ne demande pas : « *qui décide ?* » ou +« *quelle est la loi ?* », mais : « *comment tient cette régulation dans +le temps, sous l'épreuve de ses propres effets ?* ». -Ce déplacement est crucial. Il permet de détacher l’analyse des régimes politiques de la seule question du fondement — souverain, populaire, contractuel, divin ou technique — pour la rapporter à celle de leur régulation et de leur plasticité. Cette plasticité n’est pas synonyme de souplesse ou de permissivité. Elle désigne la capacité d’un ordre à se laisser infléchir sans se dissoudre, à se laisser interroger sans se désarmer, à se laisser reprendre sans se renier. C’est cette propriété, morphologiquement localisable, qui distingue un ordre autoritaire d’un ordre habitable ; une régulation mécanique d’une régulation vivante ; une opération froide d’une scène tenue et active. +Ce déplacement est crucial. Il permet de détacher l'analyse des régimes +politiques de la seule question du fondement — souverain, populaire, +contractuel, divin ou technique — pour la rapporter à celle de leur +régulation et de leur plasticité. Cette plasticité n'est pas synonyme de +souplesse ou de permissivité. Elle désigne la capacité d'un ordre à se +laisser infléchir sans se dissoudre, à se laisser interroger sans se +désarmer, à se laisser reprendre sans se renier. C'est cette propriété, +morphologiquement localisable, qui distingue un ordre autoritaire d'un +ordre habitable ; une régulation mécanique d'une régulation vivante ; +une opération froide d'une scène tenue et active. -Dans cette perspective, l’*archicratie* devient la forme intelligible de cette plasticité politique. Elle ne se mesure pas à l’existence de garanties formelles ou à la prolifération de droits abstraits, mais à l’effectivité de certaines fonctions morphologiques : *un sujet peut-il accéder à la scène critique ? L’opération peut-elle être suspendue ? Une comparution est-elle possible ? Une requalification peut-elle advenir ? Une mémoire critique est-elle conservée ?* Loin de tout idéalisme, le paradigme archicratique propose donc une critériologie concrète, à partir de laquelle on peut analyser la viabilité des régimes — non à partir de leurs intentions déclarées, mais à partir de leurs conditions de reformulation. +Dans cette perspective, l'*archicratie* devient la forme intelligible de +cette plasticité politique. Elle ne se mesure pas à l'existence de +garanties formelles ou à la prolifération de droits abstraits, mais à +l'effectivité de certaines fonctions morphologiques : *un sujet peut-il +accéder à la scène critique ? L'opération peut-elle être suspendue ? Une +comparution est-elle possible ? Une requalification peut-elle advenir ? +Une mémoire critique est-elle conservée ?* Loin de tout idéalisme, le +paradigme archicratique propose donc une critériologie concrète, à +partir de laquelle on peut analyser la viabilité des régimes — non à +partir de leurs intentions déclarées, mais à partir de leurs conditions +de reformulation. -C’est en ce sens qu’il s’agit d’un paradigme non pas normatif, mais épistémologiquement productif. Il ne dit pas ce que doit être un bon régime : il rend lisible ce qui rend une régulation habitable, amendable, transformable — et ce qui, à l’inverse, la ferme sur ses effets, la fige dans ses gestes, la condamne à se répéter et à terme à péricliter. Il propose une forme critique non doctrinale, une manière d’identifier des seuils, de qualifier des scènes, de repérer des tensions, sans présumer a priori d’un idéal de société. En cela, il s’adresse autant à des régimes démocratiques qu’à des régulations algorithmiques, à des dispositifs communautaires qu’à des configurations bureaucratiques. C’est un instrument d’écoute morphologique, un opérateur d’exposition et de traduction entre ce qui agit et ce qui peut être corrigé. +C'est en ce sens qu'il s'agit d'un paradigme non pas normatif, mais +épistémologiquement productif. Il ne dit pas ce que doit être un bon +régime : il rend lisible ce qui rend une régulation habitable, +amendable, transformable — et ce qui, à l'inverse, la ferme sur ses +effets, la fige dans ses gestes, la condamne à se répéter et à terme à +péricliter. Il propose une forme critique non doctrinale, une manière +d'identifier des seuils, de qualifier des scènes, de repérer des +tensions, sans présumer a priori d'un idéal de société. En cela, il +s'adresse autant à des régimes démocratiques qu'à des régulations +algorithmiques, à des dispositifs communautaires qu'à des configurations +bureaucratiques. C'est un instrument d'écoute morphologique, un +opérateur d'exposition et de traduction entre ce qui agit et ce qui peut +être corrigé. -Mais cette productivité critique engage aussi une exigence : si un régime se donne à lire archicratiquement, alors il accepte d’être adressé, de comparaître, d’être reconfiguré depuis ce qu’il fait. Et c’est là que la valence politique du paradigme se précise. Cette précision n’érige pas l’archicratie en idéal normatif préalable ; elle indique seulement le seuil à partir duquel une régulation cesse d’être purement fonctionnelle pour devenir politiquement habitable. Car un pouvoir peut bien se proclamer légitime, équitable, nécessaire — il ne devient habitable que s’il peut être mis à l’épreuve de sa propre scène. La *scène archicrative*, au cœur du paradigme, est ce lieu où le pouvoir ne s’effondre pas quand il est exposé : il s’y rend recevable. Il y gagne en consistance ce qu’il perd en clôture. Il y devient politique non par proclamation, mais par acceptation de sa propre reformulation. +Mais cette productivité critique engage aussi une exigence : si un +régime se donne à lire archicratiquement, alors il accepte d'être +adressé, de comparaître, d'être reconfiguré depuis ce qu'il fait. Et +c'est là que la valence politique du paradigme se précise. Cette +précision n'érige pas l'archicratie en idéal normatif préalable ; elle +indique seulement le seuil à partir duquel une régulation cesse d'être +purement fonctionnelle pour devenir politiquement habitable. Car un +pouvoir peut bien se proclamer légitime, équitable, nécessaire — il ne +devient habitable que s'il peut être mis à l'épreuve de sa propre scène. +La *scène archicrative*, au cœur du paradigme, est ce lieu où le pouvoir +ne s'effondre pas quand il est exposé : il s'y rend recevable. Il y +gagne en consistance ce qu'il perd en clôture. Il y devient politique +non par proclamation, mais par acceptation de sa propre reformulation. -Il fallait dès lors que cette modélisation ne se contente pas d’une intuition politique, d’un geste polémique, ou d’un effet d’annonce critique. Elle devait pouvoir fonder une validité épistémologique solide, à même de garantir que la grille archicratique ne dérive ni en système doctrinaire, ni en méthodologie molle. C’est à cette exigence que ce premier chapitre a voulu répondre, en établissant les conditions épistémologiques, morphologiques et fonctionnelles d’un paradigme rigoureux — autrement dit : sa possibilité scientifique, sa cohérence structurale et son opérabilité critique. +Il fallait dès lors que cette modélisation ne se contente pas d'une +intuition politique, d'un geste polémique, ou d'un effet d'annonce +critique. Elle devait pouvoir fonder une validité épistémologique +solide, à même de garantir que la grille archicratique ne dérive ni en +système doctrinaire, ni en méthodologie molle. C'est à cette exigence +que ce premier chapitre a voulu répondre, en établissant les conditions +épistémologiques, morphologiques et fonctionnelles d'un paradigme +rigoureux — autrement dit : sa possibilité scientifique, sa cohérence +structurale et son opérabilité critique. -Ce cadre repose d’abord sur un socle d’axiomes explicites, qui ont été énoncés avec clarté : le fait qu’il n’existe pas de régulation sans opération ; qu’il n’existe pas d’opération sans seuil ; que toute opération produit des effets ; et que tout effet, pour ne pas se refermer en boucle tautologique, suppose une scène d’adresse. Ces axiomes offrent un ancrage différentiel, à partir duquel on peut lire, comparer, décrire et falsifier les régimes régulateurs. Leur puissance tient moins à leur autorité qu’à leur fertilité ontologique et critique : ils permettent de présenter ce qui est et de faire apparaître des différences là où l’on croyait à l’unité, de voir des continuités là où l’on croyait à la rupture, de produire des régimes de lisibilité là où le pouvoir semblait se passer de forme. +Ce cadre repose d'abord sur un socle d'axiomes explicites, qui ont été +énoncés avec clarté : le fait qu'il n'existe pas de régulation sans +opération ; qu'il n'existe pas d'opération sans seuil ; que toute +opération produit des effets ; et que tout effet, pour ne pas se +refermer en boucle tautologique, suppose une scène d'adresse. Ces +axiomes offrent un ancrage différentiel, à partir duquel on peut lire, +comparer, décrire et falsifier les régimes régulateurs. Leur puissance +tient moins à leur autorité qu'à leur fertilité ontologique et critique +: ils permettent de présenter ce qui est et de faire apparaître des +différences là où l'on croyait à l'unité, de voir des continuités là où +l'on croyait à la rupture, de produire des régimes de lisibilité là où +le pouvoir semblait se passer de forme. -À cette assise épistémologique s’ajoute une topologie morphogénétique précise : celle des trois pôles co-dépendants que sont l’*arcalité*, la *cratialité*, et l’*archicration*. +À cette assise épistémologique s'ajoute une topologie morphogénétique +précise : celle des trois pôles co-dépendants que sont l'*arcalité*, la +*cratialité*, et l'*archicration*. -On pourra tenir dès lors cette distinction comme canonique dans toute la suite de l’essai : l’arcalité désigne ce à partir de quoi un ordre se fonde, la cratialité ce par quoi il opère, l’archicration ce par quoi il accepte d’être exposé à l’épreuve de ce qu’il affecte. +On pourra tenir dès lors cette distinction comme canonique dans toute la +suite de l'essai : l'arcalité désigne ce à partir de quoi un ordre se +fonde, la cratialité ce par quoi il opère, l'archicration ce par quoi il +accepte d'être exposé à l'épreuve de ce qu'il affecte. -Ces trois formes ne sont pas des catégories séparées, mais des tensions différentielles. L’*arcalité* désigne le régime de fondation, de légitimation, de normativité première. La *cratialité* désigne le régime d’opération, d’agencement, de transmission effective de l’acte régulateur. L’*archicration* désigne, enfin, le régime de mise en scène, d’exposition, de révision. À elles trois, elles ne forment pas une succession, mais une co-tenue dynamique, une *structure tenségrale*, un méta-régime dans lequel chaque pôle dépend de sa capacité à être modulé, repris ou réinstitué par les deux autres. C’est cette interdépendance structurelle qui rend le paradigme archicratique proprement transductif : non pas un système clos, mais une forme générative de différenciation épistémique, lisible dans des contextes variés, mais toujours soumise à ses propres conditions de vérification. +Ces trois formes ne sont pas des catégories séparées, mais des tensions +différentielles. L'*arcalité* désigne le régime de fondation, de +légitimation, de normativité première. La *cratialité* désigne le régime +d'opération, d'agencement, de transmission effective de l'acte +régulateur. L'*archicration* désigne, enfin, le régime de mise en scène, +d'exposition, de révision. À elles trois, elles ne forment pas une +succession, mais une co-tenue dynamique, une *structure tenségrale*, un +méta-régime dans lequel chaque pôle dépend de sa capacité à être modulé, +repris ou réinstitué par les deux autres. C'est cette interdépendance +structurelle qui rend le paradigme archicratique proprement transductif +: non pas un système clos, mais une forme générative de différenciation +épistémique, lisible dans des contextes variés, mais toujours soumise à +ses propres conditions de vérification. -Enfin, l’un des apports majeurs du paradigme archicratique réside dans la discipline analytique qu’il institue : il ne repose ni sur des oppositions binaires, ni sur des jugements de valeur moralement investis. Il ne divise pas les régimes en formes de domination ou d’émancipation, en structures verticales ou horizontales, en démocraties acceptables ou en autoritarismes décriés. Il ne cherche pas à trier ce qui est « juste » de ce qui serait « illégitime » selon une norme externe. Il s’attache plutôt à repérer ce qui permet à une régulation, en situation, de se maintenir dans un équilibre habitable — ou, à l’inverse, ce qui fait qu’elle se disloque, se clôt, ou devient inaccessible à ceux qu’elle affecte. +Enfin, l'un des apports majeurs du paradigme archicratique réside dans +la discipline analytique qu'il institue : il ne repose ni sur des +oppositions binaires, ni sur des jugements de valeur moralement +investis. Il ne divise pas les régimes en formes de domination ou +d'émancipation, en structures verticales ou horizontales, en démocraties +acceptables ou en autoritarismes décriés. Il ne cherche pas à trier ce +qui est « juste » de ce qui serait « illégitime » selon une norme +externe. Il s'attache plutôt à repérer ce qui permet à une régulation, +en situation, de se maintenir dans un équilibre habitable — ou, à +l'inverse, ce qui fait qu'elle se disloque, se clôt, ou devient +inaccessible à ceux qu'elle affecte. -Le paradigme archicratique ne trie pas les régimes en “bons” ou “mauvais” : il observe, en situation et quel que soit le milieu, si une pratique collective peut être ramenée à des raisons partageables, si ses opérations et supports matériels sont visibles pour ceux qui les vivent, et s’il existe un lieu et un temps institués pour interrompre et rejouer ce qui s’impose — qu’il s’agisse d’un tour d’eau sur un réseau d’irrigation, d’une fermeture saisonnière négociée sur la grève, d’un rituel de réparation après offense, d’un comité de tri en hôpital, d’un conseil de quartier, d’une rédaction qui publie ses corrections, d’un laboratoire qui expose ses protocoles, d’un couloir de transhumance rouvert par les éleveurs, ou d’un bassin versant où l’on fait comparaître la rivière et les sols comme parties prenantes. Là où ces trois conditions — raison commune, opérativité traçable, scène d’interruption opposable — tiennent ensemble, la régulation demeure habitable et apprend d’elle-même ; là où l’une manque, elle se clôt, devient muette aux affectés (humains et non-humains) et perd la capacité de se réformer. +Le paradigme archicratique ne trie pas les régimes en "bons" ou +"mauvais" : il observe, en situation et quel que soit le milieu, si une +pratique collective peut être ramenée à des raisons partageables, si ses +opérations et supports matériels sont visibles pour ceux qui les vivent, +et s'il existe un lieu et un temps institués pour interrompre et rejouer +ce qui s'impose — qu'il s'agisse d'un tour d'eau sur un réseau +d'irrigation, d'une fermeture saisonnière négociée sur la grève, d'un +rituel de réparation après offense, d'un comité de tri en hôpital, d'un +conseil de quartier, d'une rédaction qui publie ses corrections, d'un +laboratoire qui expose ses protocoles, d'un couloir de transhumance +rouvert par les éleveurs, ou d'un bassin versant où l'on fait +comparaître la rivière et les sols comme parties prenantes. Là où ces +trois conditions — raison commune, opérativité traçable, scène +d'interruption opposable — tiennent ensemble, la régulation demeure +habitable et apprend d'elle-même ; là où l'une manque, elle se clôt, +devient muette aux affectés (humains et non-humains) et perd la capacité +de se réformer. -Notre paradigme ne se contente pas d’opposer pouvoir et contre-pouvoir ni de juger un ordre à ses intentions déclarées ; il fournit un outillage opératoire pour lire, en situation et à travers milieux, la consistance d’une régulation. +Notre paradigme ne se contente pas d'opposer pouvoir et contre-pouvoir +ni de juger un ordre à ses intentions déclarées ; il fournit un +outillage opératoire pour lire, en situation et à travers milieux, la +consistance d'une régulation. -Nous observons d’abord qui peut entrer et transformer ce qui fait règle — qu’il s’agisse d’un collectif d’irrigants qui redéfinit le tour d’eau, d’une rédaction qui publie et amende sa charte, d’un service hospitalier qui requalifie ses critères de tri, ou d’un conseil rituel qui répare l’offense — puis à quel rythme se jouent activation, suspension et ajustement, c’est-à-dire la temporalité réelle des décisions et de leurs reprises. Nous examinons où l’action comparaît (scène publique, conseil de bassin, assemblée de métiers, laboratoire ouvrant ses protocoles) et quel différé sépare l’opération de la possibilité de son réexamen effectif, car sans délai de révision institué, perdure une exécution aveugle aux conséquences. +Nous observons d'abord qui peut entrer et transformer ce qui fait règle — qu'il s'agisse d'un collectif d'irrigants qui redéfinit le tour +d'eau, d'une rédaction qui publie et amende sa charte, d'un service +hospitalier qui requalifie ses critères de tri, ou d'un conseil rituel +qui répare l'offense — puis à quel rythme se jouent activation, +suspension et ajustement, c'est-à-dire la temporalité réelle des +décisions et de leurs reprises. Nous examinons où l'action comparaît +(scène publique, conseil de bassin, assemblée de métiers, laboratoire +ouvrant ses protocoles) et quel différé sépare l'opération de la +possibilité de son réexamen effectif, car sans délai de révision +institué, perdure une exécution aveugle aux conséquences. -Nous identifions ensuite les registres de justification réellement mobilisés pour maintenir ou corriger (principe de soin, équité d’accès, soutenabilité écologique, fidélité à l’œuvre, continuité d’usage) et la forme d’adresse qui autorise — ou empêche — qu’un sujet, humain ou non-humain, atteigne la scène où se discute ce qui le concerne (habitants d’un versant, saisonniers d’une criée, usagers d’une plateforme, éleveurs sur un couloir de transhumance). En combinant ces plans — accès transformateur, rythmes, comparution, différé, justification, adresse — nous passons d’un jugement abstrait à une évaluation archicratique : un ordre est d’autant plus habitable qu’il rend ces dimensions visibles, actionnables et opposables ; il se clôt, au contraire, lorsqu’elles restent implicites, inaccessibles ou simulées. +Nous identifions ensuite les registres de justification réellement +mobilisés pour maintenir ou corriger (principe de soin, équité d'accès, +soutenabilité écologique, fidélité à l'œuvre, continuité d'usage) et la +forme d'adresse qui autorise — ou empêche — qu'un sujet, humain ou +non-humain, atteigne la scène où se discute ce qui le concerne +(habitants d'un versant, saisonniers d'une criée, usagers d'une +plateforme, éleveurs sur un couloir de transhumance). En combinant ces +plans — accès transformateur, rythmes, comparution, différé, +justification, adresse — nous passons d'un jugement abstrait à une +évaluation archicratique : un ordre est d'autant plus habitable qu'il +rend ces dimensions visibles, actionnables et opposables ; il se clôt, +au contraire, lorsqu'elles restent implicites, inaccessibles ou +simulées. -Cette lecture archicratique n’assène pas des verdicts moraux, elle tente d’éprouver des régulations situées en vérifiant, à partir d’indices observables et partageables, si un ordre tient dans la *co-viabilité*. Elle demande d’abord si les raisons qui le fondent sont adressables (*arcalité* rendue publique, compréhensible par celles et ceux qu’elle engage), puis si ses opérations sont traçables dans leurs supports (*cratialité* située : procédures, instruments, gestes, infrastructures, du comité de tri à l’atelier, du tour d’eau au service hospitalier), enfin s’il existe un lieu-temps d’interruption opposable où les affectés — humains et non-humains, habitants, usagers, utilisateurs, métiers, milieux — peuvent réellement rejouer ce qui s’impose (*archicration* effective, avec délai, comparution, formats de preuve). Quand l’un de ces trois appuis manque, la régulation se clôt (seuil déplacé sans scène, rituel de réparation court-circuité, protocole de laboratoire non exposé) ; lorsqu’ils co-existent et demeurent accessibles, elle reste habitable, révisable, apprenante. Ainsi entendue, la critique ne sépare pas “domination” et “émancipation” en abstrait : elle diagnostique des scènes — praticables ou impraticables — à partir de leurs conditions d’apparition, de leur différé et de leur opposabilité, dans la diversité concrète des milieux où se joue le commun. +Cette lecture archicratique n'assène pas des verdicts moraux, elle tente +d'éprouver des régulations situées en vérifiant, à partir d'indices +observables et partageables, si un ordre tient dans la *co-viabilité*. +Elle demande d'abord si les raisons qui le fondent sont adressables +(*arcalité* rendue publique, compréhensible par celles et ceux qu'elle +engage), puis si ses opérations sont traçables dans leurs supports +(*cratialité* située : procédures, instruments, gestes, infrastructures, +du comité de tri à l'atelier, du tour d'eau au service hospitalier), +enfin s'il existe un lieu-temps d'interruption opposable où les affectés — humains et non-humains, habitants, usagers, utilisateurs, métiers, +milieux — peuvent réellement rejouer ce qui s'impose (*archicration* +effective, avec délai, comparution, formats de preuve). Quand l'un de +ces trois appuis manque, la régulation se clôt (seuil déplacé sans +scène, rituel de réparation court-circuité, protocole de laboratoire non +exposé) ; lorsqu'ils co-existent et demeurent accessibles, elle reste +habitable, révisable, apprenante. Ainsi entendue, la critique ne sépare +pas "domination" et "émancipation" en abstrait : elle diagnostique des +scènes — praticables ou impraticables — à partir de leurs conditions +d'apparition, de leur différé et de leur opposabilité, dans la diversité +concrète des milieux où se joue le commun. -En ce sens, le paradigme archicratique offre un dispositif critique à la fois rigoureux et falsifiable. Rigoureux, parce qu’il repose sur une grille de lecture formalisée, fondée sur des catégories morphologiques circonscrites — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — et sur leurs articulations spécifiques dans chaque situation de régulation. Ces catégories ne sont pas des idéaux abstraits, mais des formes opératoires qui peuvent être situées, décrites, analysées, mises en tension. Falsifiable aussi, parce que le cadre lui-même peut être mis à l’épreuve : on peut démontrer qu’un régime qui prétendrait implicitement articuler ces trois pôles échoue à le faire ; qu’une scène annoncée comme ouverte à la contestation ne permet ni l’accès effectif, ni la comparution intelligible, ni la réversibilité motivée ; qu’un dispositif qui se présente comme équitable peine à produire les conditions minimales d’une adresse partagée. +En ce sens, le paradigme archicratique offre un dispositif critique à la +fois rigoureux et falsifiable. Rigoureux, parce qu'il repose sur une +grille de lecture formalisée, fondée sur des catégories morphologiques +circonscrites — *arcalité, cratialité, archicration* — et sur leurs +articulations spécifiques dans chaque situation de régulation. Ces +catégories ne sont pas des idéaux abstraits, mais des formes opératoires +qui peuvent être situées, décrites, analysées, mises en tension. +Falsifiable aussi, parce que le cadre lui-même peut être mis à l'épreuve +: on peut démontrer qu'un régime qui prétendrait implicitement articuler +ces trois pôles échoue à le faire ; qu'une scène annoncée comme ouverte +à la contestation ne permet ni l'accès effectif, ni la comparution +intelligible, ni la réversibilité motivée ; qu'un dispositif qui se +présente comme équitable peine à produire les conditions minimales d'une +adresse partagée. -Ce point est décisif : la théorie archicratique n’est pas un dogme, ni une logique d’application descendante. Elle ne cherche pas à enfermer le politique dans une formule. Elle se présente comme une scène critique à part entière : une scène où le pouvoir doit pouvoir être mis à l’épreuve, mais aussi — et c’est le geste réflexif fondamental — où la théorie elle-même doit pouvoir être interrogée selon ses propres critères. En cela, elle ne se contente pas de produire des outils critiques : elle ouvre un espace d’auto-critique structurée, où toute configuration — y compris théorique — peut être exposée, évaluée, reconfigurée. Elle ne prescrit pas ce que doit être une régulation légitime ; elle invite à examiner ce qui tient, ce qui dysfonctionne, ce qui résiste à la comparution, dans chaque régime, chaque dispositif, chaque scène. +Ce point est décisif : la théorie archicratique n'est pas un dogme, ni +une logique d'application descendante. Elle ne cherche pas à enfermer le +politique dans une formule. Elle se présente comme une scène critique à +part entière : une scène où le pouvoir doit pouvoir être mis à +l'épreuve, mais aussi — et c'est le geste réflexif fondamental — où +la théorie elle-même doit pouvoir être interrogée selon ses propres +critères. En cela, elle ne se contente pas de produire des outils +critiques : elle ouvre un espace d'auto-critique structurée, où toute +configuration — y compris théorique — peut être exposée, évaluée, +reconfigurée. Elle ne prescrit pas ce que doit être une régulation +légitime ; elle invite à examiner ce qui tient, ce qui dysfonctionne, ce +qui résiste à la comparution, dans chaque régime, chaque dispositif, +chaque scène. -Ce qui est gagné ici est une discipline critique contextualisable, applicable à toute configuration régulatrice — qu’elle soit juridique, bureaucratique, algorithmique, communautaire, rituelle ou hybride. La question n’est donc pas de savoir si un régime est juste selon une norme extérieure, mais : *est-il habitable ? Est-il encore capable d’assurer une viabilité à celles et ceux qu’il affecte ?* +Ce qui est gagné ici est une discipline critique contextualisable, +applicable à toute configuration régulatrice — qu'elle soit juridique, +bureaucratique, algorithmique, communautaire, rituelle ou hybride. La +question n'est donc pas de savoir si un régime est juste selon une norme +extérieure, mais : *est-il habitable ? Est-il encore capable d'assurer +une viabilité à celles et ceux qu'il affecte ?* -Si toute régulation ne tient que par l’exposition de ses raisons, la traçabilité de ses opérations et l’existence d’un lieu-temps d’interruption opposable, alors notre discours doit se soumettre aux mêmes conditions. C’est le sens de la réflexivité que nous instituons ici : l’arcalité de l’arcalité (nos fondements comparants exposent la provenance de leurs sources, la communauté qui les autorise, les voies d’élargissement qui permettent à d’autres — humains, non-humains, milieux — d’y prendre part) ; la cratialité de la cratialité (nos instruments conceptuels sont accompagnés de leurs bancs d’essai : critères d’usage, zones d’inefficacité, droits d’arrêt, essais contradictoires qui les reconfigurent) ; l’archicration de l’archicration (la scène même où s’exerce notre méthode peut être refondée : accès, coûts d’entrée, formats de preuve, rythmes de reprise) ; enfin l’archicratie de l’archicratie (nous bornons la récursivité par des paliers de revisitation et des déclencheurs explicites — moratoires, réexamens périodiques — afin d’empêcher toute sacralisation de nos propres prises). Autrement dit, la théorie n’invoque pas la scène : elle s’y présente. +Si toute régulation ne tient que par l'exposition de ses raisons, la +traçabilité de ses opérations et l'existence d'un lieu-temps +d'interruption opposable, alors notre discours doit se soumettre aux +mêmes conditions. C'est le sens de la réflexivité que nous instituons +ici : l'arcalité de l'arcalité (nos fondements comparants exposent la +provenance de leurs sources, la communauté qui les autorise, les voies +d'élargissement qui permettent à d'autres — humains, non-humains, +milieux — d'y prendre part) ; la cratialité de la cratialité (nos +instruments conceptuels sont accompagnés de leurs bancs d'essai : +critères d'usage, zones d'inefficacité, droits d'arrêt, essais +contradictoires qui les reconfigurent) ; l'archicration de +l'archicration (la scène même où s'exerce notre méthode peut être +refondée : accès, coûts d'entrée, formats de preuve, rythmes de reprise) +; enfin l'archicratie de l'archicratie (nous bornons la récursivité par +des paliers de revisitation et des déclencheurs explicites — moratoires, réexamens périodiques — afin d'empêcher toute +sacralisation de nos propres prises). Autrement dit, la théorie +n'invoque pas la scène : elle s'y présente. -Ce déplacement change la teneur de la critique. Nous diagnostiquons des scènes dans la diversité des milieux où se joue le commun. Là où un tour d’eau s’ajuste à la saison et aux sols, où un service hospitalier requalifie ses critères de tri sous le regard de celles et ceux qu’ils engagent, où une criée rouvre — ou non — une fermeture saisonnière, où une rédaction publie la filiation d’une correction, où un protocole de laboratoire s’expose à la réfutation de pairs et de profanes concernés, la théorie ne demande pas “qui a le pouvoir ?” mais “quelles raisons sont adressables, quelles opérations sont traçables, quelle interruption est opposable ?”. Lorsque ces trois appuis coexistent et demeurent accessibles, la régulation apprend d’elle-même ; lorsqu’un seul manque — fondement introuvable, opérativité opaque, absence de délai contradictoire — elle se clôt, et la co-viabilité se défait. +Ce déplacement change la teneur de la critique. Nous diagnostiquons des +scènes dans la diversité des milieux où se joue le commun. Là où un tour +d'eau s'ajuste à la saison et aux sols, où un service hospitalier +requalifie ses critères de tri sous le regard de celles et ceux qu'ils +engagent, où une criée rouvre — ou non — une fermeture saisonnière, +où une rédaction publie la filiation d'une correction, où un protocole +de laboratoire s'expose à la réfutation de pairs et de profanes +concernés, la théorie ne demande pas "qui a le pouvoir ?" mais "quelles +raisons sont adressables, quelles opérations sont traçables, quelle +interruption est opposable ?". Lorsque ces trois appuis coexistent et +demeurent accessibles, la régulation apprend d'elle-même ; lorsqu'un +seul manque — fondement introuvable, opérativité opaque, absence de +délai contradictoire — elle se clôt, et la co-viabilité se défait. -En nous appliquant cette même épreuve, nous évitons deux pièges symétriques : d’un côté, la tentation normative (prescrire sans faire apparaître) ; de l’autre, la tentation techniciste (confondre validité et performance). Notre cadre n’est recevable qu’à la condition d’être falsifiable en situation : un lecteur, une communauté ou un milieu doit pouvoir montrer que telle “raison” n’est pas adressable, que tel “instrument” n’a pas de banc d’essai public, que telle “scène” est impraticable — et obtenir en retour non une défense, mais une révision ou un affinement. Nous nommons cela le principe de suffisance de scène : nul énoncé théorique n’est valable s’il n’établit pas la suffisance de sa propre scène d’épreuve (qui parle, où comparaître, selon quel délai, avec quel pouvoir de suspension ou de réforme). +En nous appliquant cette même épreuve, nous évitons deux pièges +symétriques : d'un côté, la tentation normative (prescrire sans faire +apparaître) ; de l'autre, la tentation techniciste (confondre validité +et performance). Notre cadre n'est recevable qu'à la condition d'être +falsifiable en situation : un lecteur, une communauté ou un milieu doit +pouvoir montrer que telle "raison" n'est pas adressable, que tel +"instrument" n'a pas de banc d'essai public, que telle "scène" est +impraticable — et obtenir en retour non une défense, mais une révision +ou un affinement. Nous nommons cela le principe de suffisance de scène : +nul énoncé théorique n'est valable s'il n'établit pas la suffisance de +sa propre scène d'épreuve (qui parle, où comparaître, selon quel délai, +avec quel pouvoir de suspension ou de réforme). -Dès lors, cette conclusion installe un protocole. Nous y engageons notre théorie à demeurer adressable dans ses fondements, traçable dans ses instruments, interruptible dans ses formats : arcalité exposée, cratialité éprouvée, archicration ouverte — et, au-delà, une archicratie méthodologique qui assure la non-clôture de l’ensemble en programmant ses propres paliers de révision. Si quelque chose “tient” ici, ce ne sera pas par autorité, mais par la capacité reconnue et instituée de celles et ceux que nos pages affectent à rouvrir ce qui s’y affirme. C’est à ce prix — et à ce prix seulement — que la théorie archicrative de l’archicratie parlera depuis la scène qu’elle habite, et qu’elle contribuera, avec justesse, à la tâche la plus simple bien que la plus rare : rendre le monde tant que possible intelligible. +Dès lors, cette conclusion installe un protocole. Nous y engageons notre +théorie à demeurer adressable dans ses fondements, traçable dans ses +instruments, interruptible dans ses formats : arcalité exposée, +cratialité éprouvée, archicration ouverte — et, au-delà, une +archicratie méthodologique qui assure la non-clôture de l'ensemble en +programmant ses propres paliers de révision. Si quelque chose "tient" +ici, ce ne sera pas par autorité, mais par la capacité reconnue et +instituée de celles et ceux que nos pages affectent à rouvrir ce qui s'y +affirme. C'est à ce prix — et à ce prix seulement — que la théorie +archicrative de l'archicratie parlera depuis la scène qu'elle habite, et +qu'elle contribuera, avec justesse, à la tâche la plus simple bien que +la plus rare : rendre le monde tant que possible intelligible. -C’est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique n’unifie pas les régimes, il les différencie. Il montre qu’il n’existe pas de pouvoir « pur », pas plus que de forme de régulation intégralement consistante. Il n’y a que des combinaisons — plus ou moins tenues, plus ou moins désajustées, plus ou moins reconfigurables — entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui s’expose. Un régime peut se déclarer démocratique et être cratialement impénétrable. Un dispositif peut se présenter comme ouvert et ne tenir aucune scène. Une communauté peut opérer une régulation sans texte fondateur, mais avec une scène de comparution vive. Le paradigme ne fige rien : il rend lisibles les écarts entre ce qui est institué, ce qui est agissant et sur quoi il agit, ce qui est rendu contestable. +C'est pourquoi le paradigme archicratique n'unifie pas les régimes, il +les différencie. Il montre qu'il n'existe pas de pouvoir « pur », pas +plus que de forme de régulation intégralement consistante. Il n'y a que +des combinaisons — plus ou moins tenues, plus ou moins désajustées, +plus ou moins reconfigurables — entre ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce +qui s'expose. Un régime peut se déclarer démocratique et être +cratialement impénétrable. Un dispositif peut se présenter comme ouvert +et ne tenir aucune scène. Une communauté peut opérer une régulation sans +texte fondateur, mais avec une scène de comparution vive. Le paradigme +ne fige rien : il rend lisibles les écarts entre ce qui est institué, ce +qui est agissant et sur quoi il agit, ce qui est rendu contestable. -Ce dispositif différentiel est ce qui va désormais guider la progression de l’essai. Le paradigme n’est pas un point d’arrivée théorique, mais un instrument d’apparition ontologique et de traversée critique qui va se déployer à travers différentes scènes historiques, philosophiques, politiques et techniques. Chaque chapitre à venir n’est pas une « application » du modèle, mais une expérimentation située de ses puissances de lecture. +Ce dispositif différentiel est ce qui va désormais guider la progression +de l'essai. Le paradigme n'est pas un point d'arrivée théorique, mais un +instrument d'apparition ontologique et de traversée critique qui va se +déployer à travers différentes scènes historiques, philosophiques, +politiques et techniques. Chaque chapitre à venir n'est pas une +« application » du modèle, mais une expérimentation située de ses +puissances de lecture. -Dans cette optique, le chapitre 2 constituera l’épreuve originelle. En retraçant les formes premières de régulation collective — qu’elles soient rituelles, coutumières, scripturaires, logistiques ou symboliques — nous ne nous contenterons pas de repérer les « prémices » d’un système préfiguré. Nous viserons au contraire à rendre compte de la multiplicité des configurations régulatrices à travers lesquelles les formes sociales ont cherché à tenir, à ajuster, à transmettre et à exposer leur propre ordre de viabilité. L’*arcalité*, la *cratialité* et l’*archicration*, loin de s’y présenter comme concepts doctrinaux, y apparaîtront comme prises modulantes — parfois explicites, parfois oblitérées, parfois inventées — qui structurent la possibilité même d’un régime de co-viabilité. +Dans cette optique, le chapitre 2 constituera l'épreuve originelle. En +retraçant les formes premières de régulation collective — qu'elles +soient rituelles, coutumières, scripturaires, logistiques ou symboliques — nous ne nous contenterons pas de repérer les « prémices » d'un +système préfiguré. Nous viserons au contraire à rendre compte de la +multiplicité des configurations régulatrices à travers lesquelles les +formes sociales ont cherché à tenir, à ajuster, à transmettre et à +exposer leur propre ordre de viabilité. L'*arcalité*, la *cratialité* et +l'*archicration*, loin de s'y présenter comme concepts doctrinaux, y +apparaîtront comme prises modulantes — parfois explicites, parfois +oblitérées, parfois inventées — qui structurent la possibilité même +d'un régime de co-viabilité. -Ce qui s’ouvre alors est un laboratoire de différenciation régulatrice. Le paradigme archicratique, tel qu’il a été posé ici dans sa topologie formelle, trouvera dans le chapitre 2 les premières scènes d’épreuve de sa pertinence différentielle : il y montrera qu’il est capable de rendre intelligible ce qui varie réellement d’un régime à l’autre — selon la manière dont il fonde, opère, ou se laisse interroger. Loin d’imposer ses catégories, il s’y laissera *moduler* par les formes historiques, dans une dynamique de transduction critique : non pour valider son propre appareil conceptuel, mais pour en éprouver les seuils, les écarts, les tensions fécondes. +Ce qui s'ouvre alors est un laboratoire de différenciation régulatrice. +Le paradigme archicratique, tel qu'il a été posé ici dans sa topologie +formelle, trouvera dans le chapitre 2 les premières scènes d'épreuve de +sa pertinence différentielle : il y montrera qu'il est capable de rendre +intelligible ce qui varie réellement d'un régime à l'autre — selon la +manière dont il fonde, opère, ou se laisse interroger. Loin d'imposer +ses catégories, il s'y laissera *moduler* par les formes historiques, +dans une dynamique de transduction critique : non pour valider son +propre appareil conceptuel, mais pour en éprouver les seuils, les +écarts, les tensions fécondes. -Car si l’arcalité ne précède pas toujours la cratialité, si la scène d’archicration n’est pas partout formellement instituée, si certaines co-viabilités se soutiennent à travers des fondements implicites, des suspensions peu codifiées ou des mémoires faiblement stabilisées, alors il faut reconnaître que le paradigme ne détermine pas les régimes qu’il analyse : il s’expose à leur complexité. Il n’est pas un moule, mais un geste de lecture — une manière de faire apparaître les points de tension, de redistribution et de transformation. Le chapitre 2 montrera alors comment des configurations archaïques ou proto-politiques, souvent considérées comme « pré-étatiques », témoignent en réalité de formes complexes de régulation différée, de justification rituelle, d’adresse symbolique, de seuils narratifs ou d’épreuves collectives. Il révélera que l’archicration ne coïncide pas nécessairement avec la démocratie formelle, pas plus que la cratialité avec la souveraineté étatique, ni l’arcalité avec la seule Loi écrite : les régimes de viabilité se sont déployés à travers des architectures plus hétérogènes, plus fragiles, plus inventives qu’on ne le suppose. +Car si l'arcalité ne précède pas toujours la cratialité, si la scène +d'archicration n'est pas partout formellement instituée, si certaines +co-viabilités se soutiennent à travers des fondements implicites, des +suspensions peu codifiées ou des mémoires faiblement stabilisées, alors +il faut reconnaître que le paradigme ne détermine pas les régimes qu'il +analyse : il s'expose à leur complexité. Il n'est pas un moule, mais un +geste de lecture — une manière de faire apparaître les points de +tension, de redistribution et de transformation. Le chapitre 2 montrera +alors comment des configurations archaïques ou proto-politiques, souvent +considérées comme « pré-étatiques », témoignent en réalité de formes +complexes de régulation différée, de justification rituelle, d'adresse +symbolique, de seuils narratifs ou d'épreuves collectives. Il révélera +que l'archicration ne coïncide pas nécessairement avec la démocratie +formelle, pas plus que la cratialité avec la souveraineté étatique, ni +l'arcalité avec la seule Loi écrite : les régimes de viabilité se sont +déployés à travers des architectures plus hétérogènes, plus fragiles, +plus inventives qu'on ne le suppose. -Cette co-génération interdit d’en faire une théorie totale. Le paradigme n’a de validité qu’à la condition de rester exposé aux matériaux qu’il interroge, aux contre-descriptions qu’ils imposent, et aux limites que certaines configurations opposent à sa propre extension. Il ne vaut donc ni comme langue souveraine du politique, ni comme schème d’absorption générale, mais comme discipline de discernement dont la portée doit être continuellement rééprouvée. +Cette co-génération interdit d'en faire une théorie totale. Le paradigme +n'a de validité qu'à la condition de rester exposé aux matériaux qu'il +interroge, aux contre-descriptions qu'ils imposent, et aux limites que +certaines configurations opposent à sa propre extension. Il ne vaut donc +ni comme langue souveraine du politique, ni comme schème d'absorption +générale, mais comme discipline de discernement dont la portée doit être +continuellement rééprouvée. -C’est donc une archéologie morphologique qui s’ouvrira. Non pas pour remonter à un commencement, mais pour différencier les formes premières de régulation tenue, et ainsi éprouver en retour — par contraste, par confrontation, par amplification — la validité opératoire du paradigme archicratique. Car ce n’est qu’en le confrontant à ces régimes situés qui n’avaient pas encore nos institutions, nos catégories, ni nos grammaires politiques, que nous pourrons établir qu’il s’agit bien d’un paradigme de lecture différenciateur, et non d’un système normatif reconduit à rebours. +C'est donc une archéologie morphologique qui s'ouvrira. Non pas pour +remonter à un commencement, mais pour différencier les formes premières +de régulation tenue, et ainsi éprouver en retour — par contraste, par +confrontation, par amplification — la validité opératoire du paradigme +archicratique. Car ce n'est qu'en le confrontant à ces régimes situés +qui n'avaient pas encore nos institutions, nos catégories, ni nos +grammaires politiques, que nous pourrons établir qu'il s'agit bien d'un +paradigme de lecture différenciateur, et non d'un système normatif +reconduit à rebours. -Ainsi se clôt ce chapitre 1 : non dans la certitude d’un modèle à dérouler, mais dans l’ouverture d’un champ d’épreuve critique. Car si l’archicration constitue bien la condition d’habitabilité d’un ordre, encore faut-il reconnaître qu’elle ne se donne pas partout sous la forme d’une scène pleinement formalisée, stable ou juridiquement instituée. Elle peut être diffuse, rituelle, intermittente, faiblement codifiée ; mais partout où elle est durablement neutralisée, vidée de sa prise, relocalisée hors d’atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante, la régulation se ferme, devient indisponible à ses affectés et compromet sa propre co-viabilité. Chaque ordre doit donc être interrogé depuis les formes concrètes par lesquelles il rend ses décisions, ses justifications et ses tensions exposables, discutables et révisables, plutôt que depuis nos seules catégories héritées. Le chapitre 2 n’aura pas à éprouver l’origine pure du paradigme, mais sa capacité à rendre compte, sans réduction, de la diversité historique des formes de viabilité collective — autrement dit, de leur co-viabilité. +Ainsi se clôt ce chapitre 1 : non dans la certitude d'un modèle à +dérouler, mais dans l'ouverture d'un champ d'épreuve critique. Car si +l'archicration constitue bien la condition d'habitabilité d'un ordre, +encore faut-il reconnaître qu'elle ne se donne pas partout sous la forme +d'une scène pleinement formalisée, stable ou juridiquement instituée. +Elle peut être diffuse, rituelle, intermittente, faiblement codifiée ; +mais partout où elle est durablement neutralisée, vidée de sa prise, +relocalisée hors d'atteinte ou rendue pratiquement inopérante, la +régulation se ferme, devient indisponible à ses affectés et compromet sa +propre co-viabilité. Chaque ordre doit donc être interrogé depuis les +formes concrètes par lesquelles il rend ses décisions, ses +justifications et ses tensions exposables, discutables et révisables, +plutôt que depuis nos seules catégories héritées. Le chapitre 2 n'aura +pas à éprouver l'origine pure du paradigme, mais sa capacité à rendre +compte, sans réduction, de la diversité historique des formes de +viabilité collective — autrement dit, de leur co-viabilité. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-2.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-2.mdx index 417c31f..93fb65a 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-2.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-2.mdx @@ -1,1401 +1,6354 @@ --- -title: "Chapitre 2 — Archéogenèse des régimes de co-viabilité" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Chapitre 2 — Archéogenèse des régimes de co-viabilité +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 30 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_2–Archeogenese_des_regimes_de_co-viabilite-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_2–Archeogenese_des_regimes_de_co-viabilite-version_officielle.docx --- -À ce stade de notre essai, l’archicratie a été définie comme une structure dynamique de co-viabilité tensionnelle articulant trois pôles fondamentaux : l’arcalité, la cratialité et l’archicration. Le chapitre 1 en a établi la portée heuristique, herméneutique et politique. Le présent chapitre en déplace désormais le centre de gravité : de la formalisation conceptuelle vers l’archéologie historique, de l’épistémologique vers l’empirique de longue durée. -Car bien avant de gouverner, les sociétés humaines ont dû se réguler. Avant l’État, avant le code, avant la loi, elles ont élaboré des dispositifs symboliques, rituels, techniques, narratifs ou scripturaux capables de rendre viable la co-présence, de différer la violence, d’orienter les conduites et de stabiliser des formes de vie communes. L’hypothèse directrice de ce chapitre est la suivante : les sociétés humaines apparaissent d’abord, pour l’analyse, comme des collectifs régulateurs. +À ce stade de notre essai, l'archicratie a été définie comme une +structure dynamique de co-viabilité tensionnelle articulant trois pôles +fondamentaux : l'arcalité, la cratialité et l'archicration. Le chapitre +1 en a établi la portée heuristique, herméneutique et politique. Le +présent chapitre en déplace désormais le centre de gravité : de la +formalisation conceptuelle vers l'archéologie historique, de +l'épistémologique vers l'empirique de longue durée. -Il s’agit dès lors d’entreprendre une archéologie comparée des régimes de co-viabilité. Non pour reconstruire une histoire linéaire du pouvoir, ni pour projeter rétrospectivement l’archicratie sur tout le passé humain, mais pour repérer, dans des contextes historiques et culturels hétérogènes, les formes par lesquelles les sociétés ont institué, relayé, différé ou reconfiguré leurs dispositifs de régulation. La typologie qui suit n’a donc pas pour fonction d’ordonner des stades de développement, mais de rendre intelligibles des configurations morphologiques distinctes propres à éprouver la fécondité du paradigme archicratique. +Car bien avant de gouverner, les sociétés humaines ont dû se réguler. +Avant l'État, avant le code, avant la loi, elles ont élaboré des +dispositifs symboliques, rituels, techniques, narratifs ou scripturaux +capables de rendre viable la co-présence, de différer la violence, +d'orienter les conduites et de stabiliser des formes de vie communes. +L'hypothèse directrice de ce chapitre est la suivante : les sociétés +humaines apparaissent d'abord, pour l'analyse, comme des collectifs +régulateurs. + +Il s'agit dès lors d'entreprendre une archéologie comparée des régimes +de co-viabilité. Non pour reconstruire une histoire linéaire du pouvoir, +ni pour projeter rétrospectivement l'archicratie sur tout le passé +humain, mais pour repérer, dans des contextes historiques et culturels +hétérogènes, les formes par lesquelles les sociétés ont institué, +relayé, différé ou reconfiguré leurs dispositifs de régulation. La +typologie qui suit n'a donc pas pour fonction d'ordonner des stades de +développement, mais de rendre intelligibles des configurations +morphologiques distinctes propres à éprouver la fécondité du paradigme +archicratique. ## **2.1 — Enjeux scientifiques et méthodologiques** -Toute théorie générale de la régulation sociale se heurte à un double impératif méthodologique : éviter les illusions de linéarité ou de progrès inhérentes aux schémas évolutionnistes, sans pour autant sombrer dans une contingence descriptive qui dissoudrait la conceptualisation dans la pluralité des cas. Le présent chapitre engage donc un geste scientifique précis : celui d’une archéologie comparée des méta-régimes régulateurs, conduite à la croisée de plusieurs traditions disciplinaires, mais orientée par une visée historique, généalogique et morphologique spécifique. +Toute théorie générale de la régulation sociale se heurte à un double +impératif méthodologique : éviter les illusions de linéarité ou de +progrès inhérentes aux schémas évolutionnistes, sans pour autant sombrer +dans une contingence descriptive qui dissoudrait la conceptualisation +dans la pluralité des cas. Le présent chapitre engage donc un geste +scientifique précis : celui d'une archéologie comparée des méta-régimes +régulateurs, conduite à la croisée de plusieurs traditions +disciplinaires, mais orientée par une visée historique, généalogique et +morphologique spécifique. -Toutes les sociétés humaines s’inscrivent dans un environnement physique structurant. Reliefs, climats, ressources, latitudes, saisons, humidité de l’air, propriétés de la matière : rien de ce qui rend le monde habitable ne saurait être pensé hors des régularités géophysico-chimiques du milieu. Mais ces contraintes ne constituent pas encore des régimes archicratiques. Les morphologies du terrain, les températures saisonnières, les pressions atmosphériques ou les rythmes hydrologiques imposent des conditions de viabilité, sans pour autant définir des formes instituées de co-viabilité. Le gel n’exclut pas : il empêche. Le fleuve ne sélectionne pas : il canalise. La pluie ne différencie pas : elle affecte indistinctement. Ce sont des conditions d’habitation, non des procédures de légitimation. +Toutes les sociétés humaines s'inscrivent dans un environnement physique +structurant. Reliefs, climats, ressources, latitudes, saisons, humidité +de l'air, propriétés de la matière : rien de ce qui rend le monde +habitable ne saurait être pensé hors des régularités +géophysico-chimiques du milieu. Mais ces contraintes ne constituent pas +encore des régimes archicratiques. Les morphologies du terrain, les +températures saisonnières, les pressions atmosphériques ou les rythmes +hydrologiques imposent des conditions de viabilité, sans pour autant +définir des formes instituées de co-viabilité. Le gel n'exclut pas : il +empêche. Le fleuve ne sélectionne pas : il canalise. La pluie ne +différencie pas : elle affecte indistinctement. Ce sont des conditions +d'habitation, non des procédures de légitimation. -Un régime archicratique commence là où une contrainte devient forme différenciée, code de distinction, cadre de régulation ou vecteur d’obligation. Il ne suffit pas qu’une ressource soit rare ou qu’un terrain soit hostile : encore faut-il que cette rareté ou cette hostilité donne lieu à une organisation symbolique, à une hiérarchisation des usages ou à une sélection normative des comportements. Tant que la pression du milieu n’est pas transformée en règle ou en dispositif, elle ne relève pas d’une archicration. +Un régime archicratique commence là où une contrainte devient forme +différenciée, code de distinction, cadre de régulation ou vecteur +d'obligation. Il ne suffit pas qu'une ressource soit rare ou qu'un +terrain soit hostile : encore faut-il que cette rareté ou cette +hostilité donne lieu à une organisation symbolique, à une +hiérarchisation des usages ou à une sélection normative des +comportements. Tant que la pression du milieu n'est pas transformée en +règle ou en dispositif, elle ne relève pas d'une archicration. -Ainsi, la rareté de l’eau devient politique lorsqu’elle est administrée selon des protocoles hiérarchiques (puits, rituels, affectations). Le relief devient régime lorsqu’il est intégré dans une topographie sacrée (hauteurs interdites, vallées cérémonielles). La saison devient norme lorsqu’elle prescrit des interdits, ordonne des festivités ou cadence le calendrier rituel. +Ainsi, la rareté de l'eau devient politique lorsqu'elle est administrée +selon des protocoles hiérarchiques (puits, rituels, affectations). Le +relief devient régime lorsqu'il est intégré dans une topographie sacrée +(hauteurs interdites, vallées cérémonielles). La saison devient norme +lorsqu'elle prescrit des interdits, ordonne des festivités ou cadence le +calendrier rituel. -Toute archicration suppose donc un travail d’institution sur le donné naturel : elle ne résulte pas d’une nécessité brute, mais d’un processus par lequel une contrainte est convertie en norme. Ce chapitre ne portera donc pas sur les déterminations environnementales comme telles, mais sur les dispositifs symboliques, techniques, narratifs ou rituels par lesquels les sociétés humaines en ont fait un ordre, une grille, une évidence codifiée. +Toute archicration suppose donc un travail d'institution sur le donné +naturel : elle ne résulte pas d'une nécessité brute, mais d'un processus +par lequel une contrainte est convertie en norme. Ce chapitre ne portera +donc pas sur les déterminations environnementales comme telles, mais sur +les dispositifs symboliques, techniques, narratifs ou rituels par +lesquels les sociétés humaines en ont fait un ordre, une grille, une +évidence codifiée. -D’un point de vue méthodologique, il ne s’agira ni de produire un récit historique continu, ni de classer les formes sociales selon un degré de complexité croissante, mais de repérer des invariants régulateurs structurants à partir d’exemples situés, de configurations morphologiques et de dispositifs incarnés. Il s’agit, au sens foucaldien, d’un geste archéologique : faire émerger, à travers les strates historiques, les systèmes symboliques, les logiques techniques et les formes de viabilisation collective, les conditions de possibilité des méta-régimes régulateurs. +D'un point de vue méthodologique, il ne s'agira ni de produire un récit +historique continu, ni de classer les formes sociales selon un degré de +complexité croissante, mais de repérer des invariants régulateurs +structurants à partir d'exemples situés, de configurations +morphologiques et de dispositifs incarnés. Il s'agit, au sens +foucaldien, d'un geste archéologique : faire émerger, à travers les +strates historiques, les systèmes symboliques, les logiques techniques +et les formes de viabilisation collective, les conditions de possibilité +des méta-régimes régulateurs. -Cette archéologie s’appuiera sur une méthodologie comparatiste de la régulation, consistant à confronter ses formes dans des contextes culturels, technologiques, symboliques et politiques radicalement hétérogènes, afin de mettre en évidence des structures de viabilisation partiellement isomorphes. Ainsi, une cérémonie funéraire paléolithique, une règle canonique médiévale ou une interface numérique de feedback comportemental, bien qu’historiquement discontinues, peuvent être interrogées selon les mêmes axes : quelle arcalité est mobilisée, quelle cratialité opère, quelle archicration assure la co-viabilité ? +Cette archéologie s'appuiera sur une méthodologie comparatiste de la +régulation, consistant à confronter ses formes dans des contextes +culturels, technologiques, symboliques et politiques radicalement +hétérogènes, afin de mettre en évidence des structures de viabilisation +partiellement isomorphes. Ainsi, une cérémonie funéraire paléolithique, +une règle canonique médiévale ou une interface numérique de feedback +comportemental, bien qu'historiquement discontinues, peuvent être +interrogées selon les mêmes axes : quelle arcalité est mobilisée, quelle +cratialité opère, quelle archicration assure la co-viabilité ? -Cette méthode comparée implique un positionnement critique net contre trois réductions majeures : les lectures évolutionnistes linéaires, qui projettent une trajectoire nécessaire du mythe vers la raison, du rituel vers la loi et du sacré vers l’État rationnel ; les approches étatocentrées, qui identifient abusivement la régulation sociale à la seule souveraineté institutionnelle ; les analyses strictement économicistes, qui ramènent les scènes régulatrices à des fonctions d’allocation ou de maximisation. Dans chacun de ces cas, ce sont des dimensions décisives de la co-viabilité — symboliques, rituelles, affectives, techniques ou narratives — qui se trouvent invisibilisées. +Cette méthode comparée implique un positionnement critique net contre +trois réductions majeures : les lectures évolutionnistes linéaires, qui +projettent une trajectoire nécessaire du mythe vers la raison, du rituel +vers la loi et du sacré vers l'État rationnel ; les approches +étatocentrées, qui identifient abusivement la régulation sociale à la +seule souveraineté institutionnelle ; les analyses strictement +économicistes, qui ramènent les scènes régulatrices à des fonctions +d'allocation ou de maximisation. Dans chacun de ces cas, ce sont des +dimensions décisives de la co-viabilité — symboliques, rituelles, +affectives, techniques ou narratives — qui se trouvent invisibilisées. -L’enjeu est triple : détecter des formes historiques de régulation irréductibles au seul pouvoir ou à la seule loi ; les comparer à travers des contextes hétérogènes en les relisant selon le triptyque archicratique ; puis modéliser les invariants morpho-régulateurs qui rendent possible la co-viabilité d’une société donnée. +L'enjeu est triple : détecter des formes historiques de régulation +irréductibles au seul pouvoir ou à la seule loi ; les comparer à travers +des contextes hétérogènes en les relisant selon le triptyque +archicratique ; puis modéliser les invariants morpho-régulateurs qui +rendent possible la co-viabilité d'une société donnée. -Une précaution s’impose cependant. La méthode comparatiste ici mobilisée ne doit pas être comprise comme le droit de relire indéfiniment tout matériau historique à travers la seule triade archicratique. Son usage n’est justifié que lorsqu’il met au jour un écart de lisibilité réel : dissociation entre principe de recevabilité et opérateurs effectifs, tension entre effectuation et scène d’épreuve, ou déplacement silencieux de la contestabilité hors des formes manifestes de l’ordre. Là où de telles distinctions ne produisent aucun surcroît de discernement, la typologie doit s’effacer devant des descriptions plus fines, plus locales ou plus adéquates à la texture propre du cas. Une grammaire comparative robuste ne vaut pas par sa capacité d’absorption, mais par sa retenue discriminante. +Une précaution s'impose cependant. La méthode comparatiste ici mobilisée +ne doit pas être comprise comme le droit de relire indéfiniment tout +matériau historique à travers la seule triade archicratique. Son usage +n'est justifié que lorsqu'il met au jour un écart de lisibilité réel : +dissociation entre principe de recevabilité et opérateurs effectifs, +tension entre effectuation et scène d'épreuve, ou déplacement silencieux +de la contestabilité hors des formes manifestes de l'ordre. Là où de +telles distinctions ne produisent aucun surcroît de discernement, la +typologie doit s'effacer devant des descriptions plus fines, plus +locales ou plus adéquates à la texture propre du cas. Une grammaire +comparative robuste ne vaut pas par sa capacité d'absorption, mais par +sa retenue discriminante. -Cette retenue doit être entendue au sens fort. Elle exclut notamment trois dérives : la projection rétrospective d’un vocabulaire tardif sur des sociétés qui n’en fournissent pas les médiations suffisantes ; la reconstruction spéculative de scènes ou de différenciations que le matériau disponible ne permet pas d’attester ; enfin, l’illusion selon laquelle toute forme de coordination, de ritualité ou d’ajustement devrait être immédiatement élevée au rang de régime archicratique. Le comparatisme n’a donc de validité qu’à la condition de distinguer ce qui est effectivement reconstruit, ce qui demeure seulement plausible, et ce qui doit rester hors de portée de la triade. Il ne s’agit ni d’exposer une histoire totalisante des sociétés humaines, ni d’additionner des cas, mais de poser les conditions d’une typologie opératoire de méta-régimes régulateurs. +Cette retenue doit être entendue au sens fort. Elle exclut notamment +trois dérives : la projection rétrospective d'un vocabulaire tardif sur +des sociétés qui n'en fournissent pas les médiations suffisantes ; la +reconstruction spéculative de scènes ou de différenciations que le +matériau disponible ne permet pas d'attester ; enfin, l'illusion selon +laquelle toute forme de coordination, de ritualité ou d'ajustement +devrait être immédiatement élevée au rang de régime archicratique. Le +comparatisme n'a donc de validité qu'à la condition de distinguer ce qui +est effectivement reconstruit, ce qui demeure seulement plausible, et ce +qui doit rester hors de portée de la triade. Il ne s'agit ni d'exposer +une histoire totalisante des sociétés humaines, ni d'additionner des +cas, mais de poser les conditions d'une typologie opératoire de +méta-régimes régulateurs. ## **2.2 — Archét**ypologie des méta-régimes archicratiques -À partir de là, les méta-régimes archicratiques ne doivent pas être compris comme des stades successifs, mais comme des configurations différenciées, récurrentes, concurrentes et combinables de la co-viabilité. Il ne s’agit donc pas de reconstruire une chronologie des formes politiques, mais de dégager une typologie morphologique des modes d’agencement entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. +À partir de là, les méta-régimes archicratiques ne doivent pas être +compris comme des stades successifs, mais comme des configurations +différenciées, récurrentes, concurrentes et combinables de la +co-viabilité. Il ne s'agit donc pas de reconstruire une chronologie des +formes politiques, mais de dégager une typologie morphologique des modes +d'agencement entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. -Nous proposons ici une typologie de douze méta-régimes archicratiques, prolongée par un treizième plan différentiel-hybride consacré aux compositions instables, mixtes, saisonnières ou composites des régimes. Ces douze formes peuvent être distinguées comme suit : +Nous proposons ici une typologie de douze méta-régimes archicratiques, +prolongée par un treizième plan différentiel-hybride consacré aux +compositions instables, mixtes, saisonnières ou composites des régimes. +Ces douze formes peuvent être distinguées comme suit : -- méta-régime archicratique proto-symbolique, caractéristique des sociétés paléolithiques ou dites « à mémoire vive », où la co-viabilité repose sur l’incorporation rituelle, la mémoire affective et la structuration mimétique des appartenances ; +- méta-régime archicratique proto-symbolique, caractéristique des + sociétés paléolithiques ou dites « à mémoire vive », où la + co-viabilité repose sur l'incorporation rituelle, la mémoire affective + et la structuration mimétique des appartenances ; +- méta-régime archicratique sacrale non étatique, propre aux sociétés + religieuses ou théocratiques, dans lesquelles l'invisible structure le + visible et où l'autorité se différencie radicalement de la + souveraineté ; +- méta-régime archicratique techno-logistique, fondé sur l'idée de + mégamachine, dans laquelle la coordination impersonnelle précède le + commandement et où les flux prennent le pas sur les figures ; -- méta-régime archicratique sacrale non étatique, propre aux sociétés religieuses ou théocratiques, dans lesquelles l’invisible structure le visible et où l’autorité se différencie radicalement de la souveraineté ; +- méta-régime archicratique scripturo-normatif, qui institue la norme + dans l'écrit, fait de l'archive un vecteur d'autorité différée, et de + la procédure un opérateur de légitimation ; +- *méta-régime archicratique scripturo-cosmologique*, où la forme + régulatrice prend appui sur un ordre du monde stabilisé par + l'écriture, et où les structures sociales se calquent sur une + grammaire cosmique consignée dans un texte cosmographique de + référence, garantissant l'homologie entre le céleste, le terrestre et + le politique ; +- *méta-régime archicratique théologique*, fondé sur la révélation comme + source immédiate d'obligation, où la parole divine, reçue, transmise + et commentée, devient principe de légitimation en soi. L'autorité y + procède d'une instance transcendante, et la régulation s'exerce par + médiation interprétative — prophétique, doctrinale ou exégétique — sans que la norme ait besoin d'autre justification que sa provenance ; -- méta-régime archicratique techno-logistique, fondé sur l’idée de mégamachine, dans laquelle la coordination impersonnelle précède le commandement et où les flux prennent le pas sur les figures ; +- méta-régime archicratique historiographique, qui fonde la légitimité + sur l'activation d'un récit collectif institué, consigné dans des + textes-repères, et réactualisé par des protocoles publics de lecture, + de commémoration ou de transmission. L'ordre y repose sur la fidélité + narrative à une mémoire partagée, toujours réécrite et rituellement + réactivée ; +- méta-régime archicratique épistémique, dans lequel l'autorité procède + de la preuve, de la démonstration et de la formalisation objective, et + où la co-viabilité se construit par la validation critique, la + reproductibilité et la neutralisation des points de vue dans un espace + de raison partagée ; +- méta-régime archicratique esthético-symbolique, qui opère par + l'ajustement du champ sensible, canonise certaines formes comme + convenables ou désirables, et instaure l'ordre à travers la + stabilisation des styles perceptifs, sans passage par le discours ni + par l'injonction explicite ; -- méta-régime archicratique scripturo-normatif, qui institue la norme dans l’écrit, fait de l’archive un vecteur d’autorité différée, et de la procédure un opérateur de légitimation ; +- méta-régime archicratique normativo-politique, dans lequel la + co-viabilité se règle par l'institution explicite de normes + politiques, de procédures de légitimation, de droits, de souverainetés + et de scènes publiques de délibération, de contentieux ou de + représentation ; +- méta-régime archicratique marchand, où l'échange, le prix, la + solvabilité, le contrat et l'arbitrage concurrentiel deviennent les + opérateurs principaux de régulation des conduites, des accès et des + priorités ; +- méta-régime archicratique guerrier, dans lequel l'ordre se construit + autour de l'épreuve, de l'honneur, du commandement, de la discipline, + de la menace organisée et de la violence armée réglée comme scène + d'appartenance et de hiérarchisation. -- *méta-régime archicratique scripturo-cosmologique*, où la forme régulatrice prend appui sur un ordre du monde stabilisé par l’écriture, et où les structures sociales se calquent sur une grammaire cosmique consignée dans un texte cosmographique de référence, garantissant l’homologie entre le céleste, le terrestre et le politique ; +À ces douze méta-régimes archicratiques spécifiques s'ajoute un +treizième plan différentiel-hybride, consacré aux compositions +instables, mixtes, saisonnières ou composites des régimes, sans que ces +configurations constituent pour autant un méta-régime spécifique +supplémentaire. +L'archicratie cybernético-calculatoire n'est pas intégrée ici à la +typologie comme archétype à part entière. Sa singularité tient moins à +une forme pure qu'à une configuration contemporaine, historiquement +située et techniquement circonscrite. Son traitement détaillé est donc +réservé à la fin du chapitre. - -- *méta-régime archicratique théologique*, fondé sur la révélation comme source immédiate d’obligation, où la parole divine, reçue, transmise et commentée, devient principe de légitimation en soi. L’autorité y procède d’une instance transcendante, et la régulation s’exerce par médiation interprétative — prophétique, doctrinale ou exégétique — sans que la norme ait besoin d’autre justification que sa provenance ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique historiographique, qui fonde la légitimité sur l’activation d’un récit collectif institué, consigné dans des textes-repères, et réactualisé par des protocoles publics de lecture, de commémoration ou de transmission. L’ordre y repose sur la fidélité narrative à une mémoire partagée, toujours réécrite et rituellement réactivée ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique épistémique, dans lequel l’autorité procède de la preuve, de la démonstration et de la formalisation objective, et où la co-viabilité se construit par la validation critique, la reproductibilité et la neutralisation des points de vue dans un espace de raison partagée ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique esthético-symbolique, qui opère par l’ajustement du champ sensible, canonise certaines formes comme convenables ou désirables, et instaure l’ordre à travers la stabilisation des styles perceptifs, sans passage par le discours ni par l’injonction explicite ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique normativo-politique, dans lequel la co-viabilité se règle par l’institution explicite de normes politiques, de procédures de légitimation, de droits, de souverainetés et de scènes publiques de délibération, de contentieux ou de représentation ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique marchand, où l’échange, le prix, la solvabilité, le contrat et l’arbitrage concurrentiel deviennent les opérateurs principaux de régulation des conduites, des accès et des priorités ; - - - -- méta-régime archicratique guerrier, dans lequel l’ordre se construit autour de l’épreuve, de l’honneur, du commandement, de la discipline, de la menace organisée et de la violence armée réglée comme scène d’appartenance et de hiérarchisation. - -À ces douze méta-régimes archicratiques spécifiques s’ajoute un treizième plan différentiel-hybride, consacré aux compositions instables, mixtes, saisonnières ou composites des régimes, sans que ces configurations constituent pour autant un méta-régime spécifique supplémentaire. - -L’archicratie cybernético-calculatoire n’est pas intégrée ici à la typologie comme archétype à part entière. Sa singularité tient moins à une forme pure qu’à une configuration contemporaine, historiquement située et techniquement circonscrite. Son traitement détaillé est donc réservé à la fin du chapitre. - -Les développements qui suivent doivent être lus comme une cartographie d’archétypes irréductibles. Chaque méta-régime se définit par la conjonction d’un opérateur de validité, d’un locus de scène et d’une temporalité régulatrice. Avant d’introduire un nom, nous appliquons un test d’irréductibilité : à défaut de cumul de ces critères, la configuration est traitée comme variante intra-section ou comme composition différentielle. Cette nomenclature vise à éviter l’inflation catégorielle et à garantir la lisibilité des discontinuités conceptuelles. +Les développements qui suivent doivent être lus comme une cartographie +d'archétypes irréductibles. Chaque méta-régime se définit par la +conjonction d'un opérateur de validité, d'un locus de scène et d'une +temporalité régulatrice. Avant d'introduire un nom, nous appliquons un +test d'irréductibilité : à défaut de cumul de ces critères, la +configuration est traitée comme variante intra-section ou comme +composition différentielle. Cette nomenclature vise à éviter l'inflation +catégorielle et à garantir la lisibilité des discontinuités +conceptuelles. ### 2.2.1 — *Archicrations proto-symboliques —* gestuelles et linguistiques -Bien avant l’institution étatique, l’écriture ou la formalisation juridique, les collectifs humains ont dû rendre viable la co-présence dans des environnements marqués par la mobilité, l’incertitude et la violence possible des corps. Ce que nous appelons ici archicrations proto-symboliques désigne ce régime de régulation où la co-viabilité repose sur l’incorporation rituelle, la mémoire affective, la scénarisation du geste et le partage codé du sensible. +Bien avant l'institution étatique, l'écriture ou la formalisation +juridique, les collectifs humains ont dû rendre viable la co-présence +dans des environnements marqués par la mobilité, l'incertitude et la +violence possible des corps. Ce que nous appelons ici archicrations +proto-symboliques désigne ce régime de régulation où la co-viabilité +repose sur l'incorporation rituelle, la mémoire affective, la +scénarisation du geste et le partage codé du sensible. -Il ne s’agit ni d’un pré-politique confus, ni d’une étape primitive appelée à être dépassée, mais d’une configuration régulatrice suffisamment cohérente pour être traitée comme un méta-régime proto-symbolique. Sa spécificité tient à ceci : le fondement y est symbolique ou cosmologique, la puissance opérante y circule dans les corps, les gestes, les objets et les rythmes, et la scène régulatrice s’y institue sans texte ni appareil centralisé, mais déjà selon une logique de différé, de mémoire et de reprise. +Il ne s'agit ni d'un pré-politique confus, ni d'une étape primitive +appelée à être dépassée, mais d'une configuration régulatrice +suffisamment cohérente pour être traitée comme un méta-régime +proto-symbolique. Sa spécificité tient à ceci : le fondement y est +symbolique ou cosmologique, la puissance opérante y circule dans les +corps, les gestes, les objets et les rythmes, et la scène régulatrice +s'y institue sans texte ni appareil centralisé, mais déjà selon une +logique de différé, de mémoire et de reprise. -L’enjeu est donc de montrer, à partir de données archéologiques et anthropologiques convergentes, que ces sociétés ont élaboré des formes robustes de traitement des tensions. Les figures qui suivent — sépultures, tabous, échanges différés, rites visionnaires, spatialisation symbolique — ne valent pas comme curiosités du passé, mais comme opérateurs de lisibilité d’un régime proto-symbolique de co-viabilité. +L'enjeu est donc de montrer, à partir de données archéologiques et +anthropologiques convergentes, que ces sociétés ont élaboré des formes +robustes de traitement des tensions. Les figures qui suivent — sépultures, tabous, échanges différés, rites visionnaires, +spatialisation symbolique — ne valent pas comme curiosités du passé, +mais comme opérateurs de lisibilité d'un régime proto-symbolique de +co-viabilité. -Les sépultures paléolithiques constituent vraisemblablement l’une des premières scènes différées où une communauté se donne à elle-même une mémoire réglée de la perte et de la limite. En instituant un lieu, un geste et une mémoire autour du corps mort, elles transforment la disparition en opérateur d’ordre. Les cas de Sungir, Dolní Věstonice et La Chapelle-aux-Saints permettent d’en saisir trois modalités majeures. +Les sépultures paléolithiques constituent vraisemblablement l'une des +premières scènes différées où une communauté se donne à elle-même une +mémoire réglée de la perte et de la limite. En instituant un lieu, un +geste et une mémoire autour du corps mort, elles transforment la +disparition en opérateur d'ordre. Les cas de Sungir, Dolní Věstonice et +La Chapelle-aux-Saints permettent d'en saisir trois modalités majeures. -Découvert en 1955 à l’est de Moscou, le site de Sungir (culture gravettienne) a livré deux sépultures exceptionnelles : un adulte et deux enfants âgés d’environ dix ans, inhumés tête‑bêche, leurs corps couverts de plus de 10 000 perles d’ivoire de mammouth finement taillées, accompagnées de pointes en os, de disques et de bracelets (Trinkaus & Buzhilova, 2018). Les analyses isotopiques ont montré qu’un même groupe d’individus a consacré des centaines d’heures à la fabrication des parures, caractérisant ainsi un travail collectif différé et un investissement rituel sans finalité utilitaire. +Découvert en 1955 à l'est de Moscou, le site de Sungir (culture +gravettienne) a livré deux sépultures exceptionnelles : un adulte et +deux enfants âgés d'environ dix ans, inhumés tête‑bêche, leurs corps +couverts de plus de 10 000 perles d'ivoire de mammouth finement +taillées, accompagnées de pointes en os, de disques et de bracelets +(Trinkaus & Buzhilova, 2018). Les analyses isotopiques ont montré qu'un +même groupe d'individus a consacré des centaines d'heures à la +fabrication des parures, caractérisant ainsi un travail collectif +différé et un investissement rituel sans finalité utilitaire. -À Sungir, l’espace de la mort devient fondement symbolique : le geste funéraire suspend la circulation immédiate des forces pour instituer une mémoire active, collectivement investie. Leroi-Gourhan voyait dans ces dispositifs une mise en scène des valeurs ; dans une lecture archicratique, ils font apparaître une arcalité saturée de signes, une cratialité ritualisée et une scène régulatrice où le collectif traite symboliquement la limite qu’introduit la mort. +À Sungir, l'espace de la mort devient fondement symbolique : le geste +funéraire suspend la circulation immédiate des forces pour instituer une +mémoire active, collectivement investie. Leroi-Gourhan voyait dans ces +dispositifs une mise en scène des valeurs ; dans une lecture +archicratique, ils font apparaître une arcalité saturée de signes, une +cratialité ritualisée et une scène régulatrice où le collectif traite +symboliquement la limite qu'introduit la mort. -En Moravie, à Dolní Věstonice, une triple sépulture datée de 28 000 ans (Svoboda, 2015) présente trois jeunes individus déposés côte à côte, orientés vers l’est, l’un partiellement recouvert d’ocre rouge, les mains croisées sur le bassin. Autour, un vaste habitat de huttes semi‑souterraines, des fours d’argile, et des figurines animales et humaines — dont la célèbre Vénus en terre cuite, l’une des plus anciennes céramiques connues. +En Moravie, à Dolní Věstonice, une triple sépulture datée de 28 000 ans +(Svoboda, 2015) présente trois jeunes individus déposés côte à côte, +orientés vers l'est, l'un partiellement recouvert d'ocre rouge, les +mains croisées sur le bassin. Autour, un vaste habitat de huttes +semi‑souterraines, des fours d'argile, et des figurines animales et +humaines — dont la célèbre Vénus en terre cuite, l'une des plus +anciennes céramiques connues. -Olga Soffer y lit une « invention de la symbolisation partagée » : la céramique — objet de régulation — est un moyen de fixer, de différer et de transformer le geste collectif. Dans cette configuration, l’arcalité dans la codification du lieu et des orientations, la cratialité dans la fabrication (la main, la chaleur, la matière) et la scène régulatrice dans la cérémonie funéraire elle-même, qui lie le feu, l’ocre et le corps pour donner forme à la perte. +Olga Soffer y lit une « invention de la symbolisation partagée » : la +céramique — objet de régulation — est un moyen de fixer, de différer +et de transformer le geste collectif. Dans cette configuration, +l'arcalité dans la codification du lieu et des orientations, la +cratialité dans la fabrication (la main, la chaleur, la matière) et la +scène régulatrice dans la cérémonie funéraire elle-même, qui lie le feu, +l'ocre et le corps pour donner forme à la perte. -Alain Testart (*Critique du don*, 2007, p. 83‑90), quant à lui, rappelle que l’ocre et le feu appartiennent au même champ symbolique de la transformation : « on ne rend pas la vie, on la traduit ». Ici, la traduction devient scène de régulation, où la société se confronte à la finitude en la modulant rituellement. +Alain Testart (*Critique du don*, 2007, p. 83‑90), quant à lui, rappelle +que l'ocre et le feu appartiennent au même champ symbolique de la +transformation : « on ne rend pas la vie, on la traduit ». Ici, la +traduction devient scène de régulation, où la société se confronte à la +finitude en la modulant rituellement. -Plus ancien encore, le Néandertalien de La Chapelle‑aux‑Saints, découvert en 1908 et réétudié par William Rendu et al. (*PNAS*, 2013), fut trouvé dans une fosse creusée intentionnellement, le corps replié, accompagné de fragments osseux d’animaux. Le réexamen stratigraphique a confirmé que la disposition était délibérée et non le résultat d’un hasard taphonomique. +Plus ancien encore, le Néandertalien de La Chapelle‑aux‑Saints, +découvert en 1908 et réétudié par William Rendu et al. (*PNAS*, 2013), +fut trouvé dans une fosse creusée intentionnellement, le corps replié, +accompagné de fragments osseux d'animaux. Le réexamen stratigraphique a +confirmé que la disposition était délibérée et non le résultat d'un +hasard taphonomique. -Ce geste, daté d’environ 60 000 ans, constitue l’un des premiers actes de suspension du flux naturel. Le corps n’est plus laissé à la prédation ni au hasard ; il est mis en réserve. Lewis‑Williams (*The Mind in the Cave*, 2002) y voit l’émergence d’une « pensée du seuil » : l’idée qu’entre le visible et l’invisible s’installe un espace d’épreuve. +Ce geste, daté d'environ 60 000 ans, constitue l'un des premiers actes +de suspension du flux naturel. Le corps n'est plus laissé à la prédation +ni au hasard ; il est mis en réserve. Lewis‑Williams (*The Mind in the +Cave*, 2002) y voit l'émergence d'une « pensée du seuil » : l'idée +qu'entre le visible et l'invisible s'installe un espace d'épreuve. -Cette fosse néandertalienne peut être lue comme l’un des premiers indices d’une interruption symboliquement réglée du cycle biologique : le collectif, fût-il restreint, y suspend le devenir naturel du corps pour lui conférer une temporalité distincte. Ce n’est ni la crainte des morts ni la promesse d’un au‑delà, mais la mise en scène d’une limite — le geste par lequel l’humanité apprend à prendre conscience de sa condition et de finitude. +Cette fosse néandertalienne peut être lue comme l'un des premiers +indices d'une interruption symboliquement réglée du cycle biologique : +le collectif, fût-il restreint, y suspend le devenir naturel du corps +pour lui conférer une temporalité distincte. Ce n'est ni la crainte des +morts ni la promesse d'un au‑delà, mais la mise en scène d'une +limite — le geste par lequel l'humanité apprend à prendre conscience +de sa condition et de finitude. -Ces trois sites montrent une même opération régulatrice : la mort y devient instrument de viabilisation collective. Chaque sépulture articule un fondement symbolique, des gestes opérants et une scène de mémoire instituée. Loin d’être des anomalies culturelles, elles attestent que la régulation — comme mise en forme du rapport à la limite, au temps et au lien — précède l’État, et même l’écriture. +Ces trois sites montrent une même opération régulatrice : la mort y +devient instrument de viabilisation collective. Chaque sépulture +articule un fondement symbolique, des gestes opérants et une scène de +mémoire instituée. Loin d'être des anomalies culturelles, elles +attestent que la régulation — comme mise en forme du rapport à la +limite, au temps et au lien — précède l'État, et même l'écriture. -Dans les sociétés du Paléolithique supérieur, la différenciation sociale ne prend pas d’abord la forme d’une hiérarchie verticale ou d’une domination instituée, mais celle, plus diffuse, d’une syntaxe de l’interdit. Les tabous alimentaires, sexuels ou relationnels ne relèvent pas d’une irrationalité résiduelle : ils organisent la cohabitation des corps, distribuent les distances, encadrent les alliances et modulent les comportements. Ce sont moins des lois que des tracés invisibles de la co-viabilité. +Dans les sociétés du Paléolithique supérieur, la différenciation sociale +ne prend pas d'abord la forme d'une hiérarchie verticale ou d'une +domination instituée, mais celle, plus diffuse, d'une syntaxe de +l'interdit. Les tabous alimentaires, sexuels ou relationnels ne relèvent +pas d'une irrationalité résiduelle : ils organisent la cohabitation des +corps, distribuent les distances, encadrent les alliances et modulent +les comportements. Ce sont moins des lois que des tracés invisibles de +la co-viabilité. -Claude Lévi-Strauss a montré que l’interdit de l’inceste constitue le noyau génératif de tout système d’échange symbolique : la règle d’exogamie agit moins comme prohibition que comme mécanisme de redistribution des affects, des statuts et des circulations. Dans ce contexte, où l’écrit est absent et les traces lacunaires, cette logique ne peut être reconstituée qu’indirectement, à partir de la spatialisation des habitats, de certaines dissymétries figuratives et des formes probables d’alliance. +Claude Lévi-Strauss a montré que l'interdit de l'inceste constitue le +noyau génératif de tout système d'échange symbolique : la règle +d'exogamie agit moins comme prohibition que comme mécanisme de +redistribution des affects, des statuts et des circulations. Dans ce +contexte, où l'écrit est absent et les traces lacunaires, cette logique +ne peut être reconstituée qu'indirectement, à partir de la +spatialisation des habitats, de certaines dissymétries figuratives et +des formes probables d'alliance. -L’interdit alimentaire agit, lui aussi, comme opérateur de régulation. La sélection des espèces consommées, le traitement différencié des restes ou la mise à l’écart de certaines parties animales témoignent d’une économie symbolique du licite et de l’appropriable irréductible à la seule efficacité technique. Dans le même esprit, les Vénus paléolithiques peuvent être lues moins comme objets de culte que comme indices d’un codage partagé de la sexualité, de la reproduction et des transmissions, sans que cette hypothèse puisse être absolutisée. +L'interdit alimentaire agit, lui aussi, comme opérateur de régulation. +La sélection des espèces consommées, le traitement différencié des +restes ou la mise à l'écart de certaines parties animales témoignent +d'une économie symbolique du licite et de l'appropriable irréductible à +la seule efficacité technique. Dans le même esprit, les Vénus +paléolithiques peuvent être lues moins comme objets de culte que comme +indices d'un codage partagé de la sexualité, de la reproduction et des +transmissions, sans que cette hypothèse puisse être absolutisée. -Ce qui apparaît alors, c’est la capacité de ces groupes à instituer, sans loi explicite ni appareil juridique, des bornes de comportement à travers des pratiques, des objets, des récits et des gestes. Comme l’a montré Maurice Godelier, l’échange matrimonial et le don différé ne relèvent pas d’une spontanéité sociale, mais d’une temporalité réglée du retour, qui structure la relation sans avoir besoin de l’énoncer. Dans cette trame intériorisée, l’interdit ne supprime pas la tension : il lui donne forme, la distribue et la rend vivable. +Ce qui apparaît alors, c'est la capacité de ces groupes à instituer, +sans loi explicite ni appareil juridique, des bornes de comportement à +travers des pratiques, des objets, des récits et des gestes. Comme l'a +montré Maurice Godelier, l'échange matrimonial et le don différé ne +relèvent pas d'une spontanéité sociale, mais d'une temporalité réglée du +retour, qui structure la relation sans avoir besoin de l'énoncer. Dans +cette trame intériorisée, l'interdit ne supprime pas la tension : il lui +donne forme, la distribue et la rend vivable. -L’économie paléolithique cesse d’échapper au politique dès lors qu’on la considère non plus seulement sous l’angle des besoins ou des chaînes opératoires, mais à partir des formes d’échange, des circulations d’objets et des temporalités du don. Avec Mauss, puis Godelier, on comprend que ce qui structure durablement la relation n’est pas seulement l’objet donné, mais le différé qu’il institue : donner, recevoir, rendre ne forment pas une simple séquence d’échange, mais une manière de maintenir le lien dans le temps. +L'économie paléolithique cesse d'échapper au politique dès lors qu'on la +considère non plus seulement sous l'angle des besoins ou des chaînes +opératoires, mais à partir des formes d'échange, des circulations +d'objets et des temporalités du don. Avec Mauss, puis Godelier, on +comprend que ce qui structure durablement la relation n'est pas +seulement l'objet donné, mais le différé qu'il institue : donner, +recevoir, rendre ne forment pas une simple séquence d'échange, mais une +manière de maintenir le lien dans le temps. -Transposée au Paléolithique supérieur, cette logique se laisse entrevoir dans la circulation à longue distance de perles, de coquillages, de pigments, de pointes en os ou de blocs d’obsidienne, dont la trajectoire ne se réduit pas à un troc utilitaire. La lenteur même de ces circulations suggère une économie d’attente, de renvoi et d’adresse, où l’objet fonctionne comme support visible d’un lien actif. Le don n’est pas ici un acte isolé, mais l’ouverture d’un intervalle régulateur : il oblige sans contraindre, appelle sans exiger, et rend perceptible la mémoire d’un geste à venir. +Transposée au Paléolithique supérieur, cette logique se laisse entrevoir +dans la circulation à longue distance de perles, de coquillages, de +pigments, de pointes en os ou de blocs d'obsidienne, dont la trajectoire +ne se réduit pas à un troc utilitaire. La lenteur même de ces +circulations suggère une économie d'attente, de renvoi et d'adresse, où +l'objet fonctionne comme support visible d'un lien actif. Le don n'est +pas ici un acte isolé, mais l'ouverture d'un intervalle régulateur : il +oblige sans contraindre, appelle sans exiger, et rend perceptible la +mémoire d'un geste à venir. -Les alliances matrimoniales relèvent de la même logique. Comme l’a montré Lévi-Strauss, elles organisent moins une simple reproduction biologique qu’une circulation réglée des statuts, des places et des dettes symboliques. Dans le cadre paléolithique, où les preuves directes sont rares, cette structure ne peut être approchée qu’indirectement, à partir des formes d’habitat, des sépultures multiples ou des asymétries rituelles. Elle n’en indique pas moins une économie du différé dans laquelle la tension relationnelle est distribuée plutôt qu’abolie. +Les alliances matrimoniales relèvent de la même logique. Comme l'a +montré Lévi-Strauss, elles organisent moins une simple reproduction +biologique qu'une circulation réglée des statuts, des places et des +dettes symboliques. Dans le cadre paléolithique, où les preuves directes +sont rares, cette structure ne peut être approchée qu'indirectement, à +partir des formes d'habitat, des sépultures multiples ou des asymétries +rituelles. Elle n'en indique pas moins une économie du différé dans +laquelle la tension relationnelle est distribuée plutôt qu'abolie. -Testart a rappelé que le don différé peut aussi fonder des asymétries et des dépendances ; mais dans les sociétés sans accumulation durable, cette dette demeure le plus souvent mobile, réversible et partagée. Ce qui compte ici, ce n’est pas l’équilibre immédiat, mais la capacité du lien à se maintenir dans l’intervalle, par la mémoire active des échanges et des obligations non closes. +Testart a rappelé que le don différé peut aussi fonder des asymétries et +des dépendances ; mais dans les sociétés sans accumulation durable, +cette dette demeure le plus souvent mobile, réversible et partagée. Ce +qui compte ici, ce n'est pas l'équilibre immédiat, mais la capacité du +lien à se maintenir dans l'intervalle, par la mémoire active des +échanges et des obligations non closes. -Au-delà des gestes codés, des échanges différés et des sépultures investies, les sociétés paléolithiques élaborent aussi des scènes visionnaires où la régulation passe par la transformation du sensible lui-même. Les cavités ornées — Chauvet, Cosquer, Altamira, Pech Merle, Trois-Frères — ne sont ni des espaces décoratifs ni des sanctuaires au sens ultérieur, mais des lieux de co-présence non ordinaire, où se rejouent des tensions fondamentales sous forme perceptive, sonore et corporelle. +Au-delà des gestes codés, des échanges différés et des sépultures +investies, les sociétés paléolithiques élaborent aussi des scènes +visionnaires où la régulation passe par la transformation du sensible +lui-même. Les cavités ornées — Chauvet, Cosquer, Altamira, Pech Merle, +Trois-Frères — ne sont ni des espaces décoratifs ni des sanctuaires au +sens ultérieur, mais des lieux de co-présence non ordinaire, où se +rejouent des tensions fondamentales sous forme perceptive, sonore et +corporelle. -Les travaux de David Lewis-Williams et Jean Clottes ont montré que les configurations pariétales profondes concentrent des motifs et des agencements compatibles avec des états modifiés de perception : superpositions, déformations, hybridations. Il ne s’agit pas de représenter le monde, mais de le reconfigurer dans une scène où le groupe éprouve collectivement des passages, des seuils et des transformations. +Les travaux de David Lewis-Williams et Jean Clottes ont montré que les +configurations pariétales profondes concentrent des motifs et des +agencements compatibles avec des états modifiés de perception : +superpositions, déformations, hybridations. Il ne s'agit pas de +représenter le monde, mais de le reconfigurer dans une scène où le +groupe éprouve collectivement des passages, des seuils et des +transformations. -Dans les configurations ici considérées, les figures chamaniques apparaissent moins comme des autorités de commandement que comme des opérateurs de modulation : elles ne tranchent pas d’abord, elles mettent en relation. Comme le suggère Steven Mithen, ces pratiques mobilisent une proto-musicalité du langage, capable d’articuler rythme, émotion et co-activation corporelle. La scène rituelle devient alors un lieu d’ajustement où les dissonances sont traitées, les tensions rejouées et les écarts rendus partageables. +Dans les configurations ici considérées, les figures chamaniques +apparaissent moins comme des autorités de commandement que comme des +opérateurs de modulation : elles ne tranchent pas d'abord, elles mettent +en relation. Comme le suggère Steven Mithen, ces pratiques mobilisent +une proto-musicalité du langage, capable d'articuler rythme, émotion et +co-activation corporelle. La scène rituelle devient alors un lieu +d'ajustement où les dissonances sont traitées, les tensions rejouées et +les écarts rendus partageables. -La régulation s’y opère à travers une mise en forme du rapport au monde : projection d’un au-delà du visible, mobilisation des corps, synchronisation des attentions. La scène visionnaire n’impose pas un ordre, elle le fait émerger en transformant les conditions mêmes de perception et de relation. +La régulation s'y opère à travers une mise en forme du rapport au monde +: projection d'un au-delà du visible, mobilisation des corps, +synchronisation des attentions. La scène visionnaire n'impose pas un +ordre, elle le fait émerger en transformant les conditions mêmes de +perception et de relation. -Ces pratiques ne relèvent ni de la croyance naïve ni de la simple expression symbolique : elles constituent des dispositifs de régulation où le groupe traite, dans une scène partagée, ce qui excède sa maîtrise immédiate. En donnant forme à l’invisible, elles rendent vivable l’incertitude, et transforment l’épreuve en opérateur de co-viabilité. +Ces pratiques ne relèvent ni de la croyance naïve ni de la simple +expression symbolique : elles constituent des dispositifs de régulation +où le groupe traite, dans une scène partagée, ce qui excède sa maîtrise +immédiate. En donnant forme à l'invisible, elles rendent vivable +l'incertitude, et transforment l'épreuve en opérateur de co-viabilité. -L’espace paléolithique, lorsqu’il est considéré dans sa stricte matérialité, donne peu prise à la conceptualisation politique. Et pourtant, tout indique qu’il n’était ni neutre, ni indifférencié, ni purement fonctionnel. Il existe, dans l’usage même du sol, de la paroi, du vide et du seuil, une syntaxe implicite, un ordonnancement codé, une stratification régulatrice que l’on ne peut plus rabattre sur le seul besoin d’abri ou de stockage. La géographie symbolique paléolithique configure des scènes, trace des lignes d’intensité, qualifie les lieux selon leur capacité à accueillir ou à retenir, à exposer ou à envelopper. +L'espace paléolithique, lorsqu'il est considéré dans sa stricte +matérialité, donne peu prise à la conceptualisation politique. Et +pourtant, tout indique qu'il n'était ni neutre, ni indifférencié, ni +purement fonctionnel. Il existe, dans l'usage même du sol, de la paroi, +du vide et du seuil, une syntaxe implicite, un ordonnancement codé, une +stratification régulatrice que l'on ne peut plus rabattre sur le seul +besoin d'abri ou de stockage. La géographie symbolique paléolithique +configure des scènes, trace des lignes d'intensité, qualifie les lieux +selon leur capacité à accueillir ou à retenir, à exposer ou à +envelopper. -L’exemple du site de Bruniquel, daté d’environ 176 000 ans, est particulièrement éclairant : dans une cavité profonde, des structures circulaires de stalagmites ont été agencées selon une géométrie précise, sans fonction domestique identifiable. Il ne s’agit pas d’un espace d’habitation, mais d’un dispositif produisant du lieu — une configuration où l’agencement même institue une scène et appelle une attention réglée. +L'exemple du site de Bruniquel, daté d'environ 176 000 ans, est +particulièrement éclairant : dans une cavité profonde, des structures +circulaires de stalagmites ont été agencées selon une géométrie précise, +sans fonction domestique identifiable. Il ne s'agit pas d'un espace +d'habitation, mais d'un dispositif produisant du lieu — une +configuration où l'agencement même institue une scène et appelle une +attention réglée. -Cette logique se retrouve dans les grottes ornées du Paléolithique supérieur. Comme l’ont montré Jean Clottes et d’autres archéologues, les figures ne sont jamais disposées au hasard : elles s’inscrivent dans des morphologies pariétales actives, exploitent les reliefs, les failles, les bifurcations. L’espace ne sert pas de support, il oriente les gestes, module les parcours, distribue les intensités. +Cette logique se retrouve dans les grottes ornées du Paléolithique +supérieur. Comme l'ont montré Jean Clottes et d'autres archéologues, les +figures ne sont jamais disposées au hasard : elles s'inscrivent dans des +morphologies pariétales actives, exploitent les reliefs, les failles, +les bifurcations. L'espace ne sert pas de support, il oriente les +gestes, module les parcours, distribue les intensités. -Les objets portables participent de cette même spatialisation. Comme l’a montré Randall White, perles, pendeloques ou bâtons percés ne sont pas de simples ornements : ils transportent des marqueurs de relation, rendent visibles des trajectoires, signalent des appartenances. Porter un objet, c’est déplacer une mémoire et exposer un lien. +Les objets portables participent de cette même spatialisation. Comme l'a +montré Randall White, perles, pendeloques ou bâtons percés ne sont pas +de simples ornements : ils transportent des marqueurs de relation, +rendent visibles des trajectoires, signalent des appartenances. Porter +un objet, c'est déplacer une mémoire et exposer un lien. -Dans les configurations d’habitat, enfin, la disposition des foyers, des zones d’activité ou des objets votifs révèle des matrices de co-présence différenciée. Comme l’a montré Geneviève Pinçon, ces agencements distribuent les positions, orientent les interactions et produisent des formes temporaires d’ordre sans recours à une autorité centrale. +Dans les configurations d'habitat, enfin, la disposition des foyers, des +zones d'activité ou des objets votifs révèle des matrices de co-présence +différenciée. Comme l'a montré Geneviève Pinçon, ces agencements +distribuent les positions, orientent les interactions et produisent des +formes temporaires d'ordre sans recours à une autorité centrale. -Dans ces configurations, la régulation ne passe pas d’abord par la parole ou la règle explicite, mais par la disposition même des lieux. L’espace module les conduites, cadre les interactions et rend perceptibles les seuils. Il permet d’ordonner sans prescrire, de structurer sans centraliser, en inscrivant la co-viabilité dans la matérialité même du monde vécu. +Dans ces configurations, la régulation ne passe pas d'abord par la +parole ou la règle explicite, mais par la disposition même des lieux. +L'espace module les conduites, cadre les interactions et rend +perceptibles les seuils. Il permet d'ordonner sans prescrire, de +structurer sans centraliser, en inscrivant la co-viabilité dans la +matérialité même du monde vécu. -Les sociétés paléolithiques donnent à voir une forme de régulation sans appareil centralisé, sans codification explicite et sans autorité instituée, mais néanmoins structurée, opérante et transmissible. La co-viabilité y repose sur une multiplicité de dispositifs — sépultures, interdits, échanges différés, rites visionnaires, agencements spatiaux — par lesquels les tensions sont mises en forme, différées et rendues partageables. +Les sociétés paléolithiques donnent à voir une forme de régulation sans +appareil centralisé, sans codification explicite et sans autorité +instituée, mais néanmoins structurée, opérante et transmissible. La +co-viabilité y repose sur une multiplicité de dispositifs — sépultures, interdits, échanges différés, rites visionnaires, +agencements spatiaux — par lesquels les tensions sont mises en forme, +différées et rendues partageables. -Ce régime ne relève ni d’un primitivisme, ni d’un stade initial appelé à disparaître, mais d’une configuration archicratique spécifique, dans laquelle le fondement se distribue dans les formes symboliques, la puissance circule dans les gestes et les relations, et la scène apparaît chaque fois qu’un seuil est institué. La régulation ne s’y impose pas : elle émerge des médiations mêmes qui rendent le monde habitable. +Ce régime ne relève ni d'un primitivisme, ni d'un stade initial appelé à +disparaître, mais d'une configuration archicratique spécifique, dans +laquelle le fondement se distribue dans les formes symboliques, la +puissance circule dans les gestes et les relations, et la scène apparaît +chaque fois qu'un seuil est institué. La régulation ne s'y impose pas : +elle émerge des médiations mêmes qui rendent le monde habitable. -Ce premier méta-régime montre ainsi que l’archicratie ne suppose ni État, ni loi, ni institution formelle pour opérer. Elle apparaît dès que des collectifs humains inventent des formes capables de suspendre l’immédiateté, de structurer les relations et de rendre habitable la tension constitutive du vivre-ensemble. +Ce premier méta-régime montre ainsi que l'archicratie ne suppose ni +État, ni loi, ni institution formelle pour opérer. Elle apparaît dès que +des collectifs humains inventent des formes capables de suspendre +l'immédiateté, de structurer les relations et de rendre habitable la +tension constitutive du vivre-ensemble. ### 2.2.2 — *Archicrations* *sacrales non étatiques* -Avec la sédentarisation progressive, les premières formes d’agriculture et la densification des interactions intergroupes, certaines communautés néolithiques élaborent des dispositifs de régulation qui se distinguent plus nettement des formes proto-symboliques paléolithiques. Il ne s’agit pas d’une rupture soudaine, mais d’un déplacement : des régulations largement incorporées tendent à se reconfigurer autour de foyers symboliques extériorisés — lieux, objets, figures, récits, rythmes cérémoniels — sans pour autant se cristalliser en appareil étatique ou en souveraineté centralisée. +Avec la sédentarisation progressive, les premières formes d'agriculture +et la densification des interactions intergroupes, certaines communautés +néolithiques élaborent des dispositifs de régulation qui se distinguent +plus nettement des formes proto-symboliques paléolithiques. Il ne s'agit +pas d'une rupture soudaine, mais d'un déplacement : des régulations +largement incorporées tendent à se reconfigurer autour de foyers +symboliques extériorisés — lieux, objets, figures, récits, rythmes +cérémoniels — sans pour autant se cristalliser en appareil étatique ou +en souveraineté centralisée. -Dans ces configurations, la co-viabilité repose sur le sacré, mais sur un sacré qui ne se convertit pas en commandement unifié. Le pouvoir n’y est pas exercé comme décision ; il est mis à distance, ritualisé, distribué et médiatisé. C’est dans cette économie du retrait que se forme un régime archicratique spécifique : une archicration sacrale non étatique, où la cohérence collective se maintient par la différenciation symbolique, la séparation des fonctions et la codification des seuils. +Dans ces configurations, la co-viabilité repose sur le sacré, mais sur +un sacré qui ne se convertit pas en commandement unifié. Le pouvoir n'y +est pas exercé comme décision ; il est mis à distance, ritualisé, +distribué et médiatisé. C'est dans cette économie du retrait que se +forme un régime archicratique spécifique : une archicration sacrale non +étatique, où la cohérence collective se maintient par la différenciation +symbolique, la séparation des fonctions et la codification des seuils. -Les travaux de Philippe Descola, de David Graeber et David Wengrow, de Pierre Clastres et de Maurice Godelier éclairent cette logique sous plusieurs angles convergents. Ils montrent que certaines sociétés peuvent organiser leur stabilité sans centralisation coercitive, en distribuant l’autorité dans des cosmologies, des objets retirés, des rôles rituels et des médiations symboliques qui empêchent précisément la capture personnelle du pouvoir. +Les travaux de Philippe Descola, de David Graeber et David Wengrow, de +Pierre Clastres et de Maurice Godelier éclairent cette logique sous +plusieurs angles convergents. Ils montrent que certaines sociétés +peuvent organiser leur stabilité sans centralisation coercitive, en +distribuant l'autorité dans des cosmologies, des objets retirés, des +rôles rituels et des médiations symboliques qui empêchent précisément la +capture personnelle du pouvoir. -Ce qui importe ici n’est donc pas de projeter un modèle uniforme sur l’ensemble des sociétés néolithiques, mais de dégager, à partir de cas empiriquement attestés, les lignes de force d’un régime où l’ordre ne procède ni de la loi ni du commandement, mais d’une orchestration symbolique du retrait, de la distance et de la médiation. +Ce qui importe ici n'est donc pas de projeter un modèle uniforme sur +l'ensemble des sociétés néolithiques, mais de dégager, à partir de cas +empiriquement attestés, les lignes de force d'un régime où l'ordre ne +procède ni de la loi ni du commandement, mais d'une orchestration +symbolique du retrait, de la distance et de la médiation. -Au cœur de ces configurations sacrales non étatiques, le totémisme apparaît non comme une simple classification symbolique, mais comme une matrice opératoire de régulation. Il ne se réduit ni à une croyance ni à un système d’identification entre humains et non-humains : il organise des rapports de différence, d’alliance et d’interdiction qui structurent la co-viabilité du groupe. +Au cœur de ces configurations sacrales non étatiques, le totémisme +apparaît non comme une simple classification symbolique, mais comme une +matrice opératoire de régulation. Il ne se réduit ni à une croyance ni à +un système d'identification entre humains et non-humains : il organise +des rapports de différence, d'alliance et d'interdiction qui structurent +la co-viabilité du groupe. -Le site de Göbekli Tepe, daté du Xe millénaire av. J.-C., en offre une illustration particulièrement éclairante. Sur ce plateau d’Anatolie, des enceintes circulaires monumentales, composées de piliers anthropomorphes gravés de figures animales stylisées — félins, serpents, oiseaux de proie, aurochs — dessinent une scène rituelle sans équivalent domestique. L’absence d’habitat permanent ou d’activité agricole suggère un dispositif entièrement dédié à la mise en forme d’un ordre symbolique collectif. Les figures animales n’y décorent pas : elles différencient, orientent et médiatisent les relations. +Le site de Göbekli Tepe, daté du Xe millénaire av. J.-C., en offre une +illustration particulièrement éclairante. Sur ce plateau d'Anatolie, des +enceintes circulaires monumentales, composées de piliers anthropomorphes +gravés de figures animales stylisées — félins, serpents, oiseaux de +proie, aurochs — dessinent une scène rituelle sans équivalent +domestique. L'absence d'habitat permanent ou d'activité agricole suggère +un dispositif entièrement dédié à la mise en forme d'un ordre symbolique +collectif. Les figures animales n'y décorent pas : elles différencient, +orientent et médiatisent les relations. -Dans une telle configuration, le totem ne représente pas : il régule. Il distribue des positions, encadre les alliances, institue des interdits et rend possible une différenciation sans hiérarchie centralisée. Comme l’a montré Claude Lévi-Strauss, le totémisme organise des rapports de différence structurés plutôt qu’il n’exprime une croyance ; et comme l’a prolongé Philippe Descola, il opère comme un schème relationnel permettant de stabiliser indirectement les tensions en les inscrivant dans un système de correspondances. +Dans une telle configuration, le totem ne représente pas : il régule. Il +distribue des positions, encadre les alliances, institue des interdits +et rend possible une différenciation sans hiérarchie centralisée. Comme +l'a montré Claude Lévi-Strauss, le totémisme organise des rapports de +différence structurés plutôt qu'il n'exprime une croyance ; et comme l'a +prolongé Philippe Descola, il opère comme un schème relationnel +permettant de stabiliser indirectement les tensions en les inscrivant +dans un système de correspondances. -Cette logique peut se prolonger dans des configurations où le territoire lui-même devient opérateur régulateur. Dans certaines sociétés aborigènes d’Australie, étudiées notamment par Nancy Munn et Howard Morphy, chaque totem est associé à des lieux, des récits et des trajectoires mythiques qui codent les usages, les interdits et les appartenances. L’espace devient alors une carte relationnelle où la co-viabilité est inscrite dans la distribution symbolique des êtres et des positions. +Cette logique peut se prolonger dans des configurations où le territoire +lui-même devient opérateur régulateur. Dans certaines sociétés +aborigènes d'Australie, étudiées notamment par Nancy Munn et Howard +Morphy, chaque totem est associé à des lieux, des récits et des +trajectoires mythiques qui codent les usages, les interdits et les +appartenances. L'espace devient alors une carte relationnelle où la +co-viabilité est inscrite dans la distribution symbolique des êtres et +des positions. -Dans ces régimes, le totémisme fonctionne comme une technologie sociale du différé : il empêche l’absorption du même, organise l’échange sans le laisser à l’arbitraire et rend les tensions traitables en les déplaçant dans un système de médiations symboliques. Il ne fixe pas un ordre ; il en rend l’émergence possible en distribuant les conditions de la relation. +Dans ces régimes, le totémisme fonctionne comme une technologie sociale +du différé : il empêche l'absorption du même, organise l'échange sans le +laisser à l'arbitraire et rend les tensions traitables en les déplaçant +dans un système de médiations symboliques. Il ne fixe pas un ordre ; il +en rend l'émergence possible en distribuant les conditions de la +relation. -En ce sens, le totémisme néolithique ne constitue pas une forme primitive de religion, mais un dispositif régulateur à part entière : une configuration dans laquelle la différenciation symbolique permet de maintenir la co-viabilité sans recours à une autorité centralisée. +En ce sens, le totémisme néolithique ne constitue pas une forme +primitive de religion, mais un dispositif régulateur à part entière : +une configuration dans laquelle la différenciation symbolique permet de +maintenir la co-viabilité sans recours à une autorité centralisée. -Au-delà du totémisme, d’autres dispositifs sacrés assurent la régulation par dissociation, retrait et médiation. Leur fonction commune est de rendre le pouvoir opérant sans le rendre appropriable, en le déplaçant hors de toute incarnation stable. +Au-delà du totémisme, d'autres dispositifs sacrés assurent la régulation +par dissociation, retrait et médiation. Leur fonction commune est de +rendre le pouvoir opérant sans le rendre appropriable, en le déplaçant +hors de toute incarnation stable. -Le masque en constitue une forme exemplaire. Comme l’a montré Michel Leiris, il ne dissimule pas un individu mais suspend son identité pour faire apparaître une fonction. Celui qui le porte ne parle plus en son nom : il devient support d’une parole et d’un geste délégués. Cette dissociation empêche toute appropriation durable de la puissance, en la maintenant dans une scène rituelle limitée et codifiée. +Le masque en constitue une forme exemplaire. Comme l'a montré Michel +Leiris, il ne dissimule pas un individu mais suspend son identité pour +faire apparaître une fonction. Celui qui le porte ne parle plus en son +nom : il devient support d'une parole et d'un geste délégués. Cette +dissociation empêche toute appropriation durable de la puissance, en la +maintenant dans une scène rituelle limitée et codifiée. -Cette logique se prolonge dans les objets sacrés inaccessibles analysés par Maurice Godelier. Chez les Baruya, certaines flûtes ou pierres rituelles ne tirent pas leur force d’un pouvoir intrinsèque, mais du fait même qu’elles sont soustraites à la vue, au nom et à l’usage ordinaire. Leur efficacité réside dans cette mise à distance : c’est parce qu’ils ne peuvent être appropriés qu’ils structurent durablement l’ordre collectif. +Cette logique se prolonge dans les objets sacrés inaccessibles analysés +par Maurice Godelier. Chez les Baruya, certaines flûtes ou pierres +rituelles ne tirent pas leur force d'un pouvoir intrinsèque, mais du +fait même qu'elles sont soustraites à la vue, au nom et à l'usage +ordinaire. Leur efficacité réside dans cette mise à distance : c'est +parce qu'ils ne peuvent être appropriés qu'ils structurent durablement +l'ordre collectif. -Les figures médiatrices, enfin, assurent une régulation par traduction plutôt que par commandement. Dans les sociétés amazoniennes étudiées par Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, le chaman ou les figures hybrides ne détiennent pas le pouvoir : ils opèrent comme relais entre les mondes, déplacent les tensions et reconfigurent les relations sans jamais les trancher directement. Leur efficacité tient à leur instabilité même, à leur capacité à transformer les perspectives plutôt qu’à imposer une décision. +Les figures médiatrices, enfin, assurent une régulation par traduction +plutôt que par commandement. Dans les sociétés amazoniennes étudiées par +Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, le chaman ou les figures hybrides ne +détiennent pas le pouvoir : ils opèrent comme relais entre les mondes, +déplacent les tensions et reconfigurent les relations sans jamais les +trancher directement. Leur efficacité tient à leur instabilité même, à +leur capacité à transformer les perspectives plutôt qu'à imposer une +décision. -Dans ces différents dispositifs, la régulation ne procède ni de l’autorité ni de la contrainte, mais d’une mise en scène du retrait. Le pouvoir demeure actif parce qu’il est soustrait à toute instance stable : il circule, se distribue, se transforme, sans jamais pouvoir se fixer dans une position dominante. +Dans ces différents dispositifs, la régulation ne procède ni de +l'autorité ni de la contrainte, mais d'une mise en scène du retrait. Le +pouvoir demeure actif parce qu'il est soustrait à toute instance stable +: il circule, se distribue, se transforme, sans jamais pouvoir se fixer +dans une position dominante. -Ces formes montrent qu’une société peut maintenir sa cohérence en empêchant précisément la capture du pouvoir. La dissociation des fonctions, la mise à distance des objets et la médiation des figures permettent de réguler les tensions sans les concentrer dans une instance unique. +Ces formes montrent qu'une société peut maintenir sa cohérence en +empêchant précisément la capture du pouvoir. La dissociation des +fonctions, la mise à distance des objets et la médiation des figures +permettent de réguler les tensions sans les concentrer dans une instance +unique. -Ces régulations sacrales non étatiques reposent également sur des dispositifs cycliques de traitement périodique des tensions collectives. Le rite n’y stabilise pas un ordre une fois pour toutes : il le rejoue, le réactive et le rend à nouveau partageable dans une temporalité codée. +Ces régulations sacrales non étatiques reposent également sur des +dispositifs cycliques de traitement périodique des tensions collectives. +Le rite n'y stabilise pas un ordre une fois pour toutes : il le rejoue, +le réactive et le rend à nouveau partageable dans une temporalité codée. -Victor Turner a montré, à partir des rituels ndembu, que ces dispositifs ne visent pas à désigner un responsable ou à trancher un conflit, mais à reconfigurer l’ensemble du champ relationnel. Le désordre est déplacé dans une scène symbolique où gestes, chants et objets permettent de transformer la tension sans la réduire à une faute individuelle. +Victor Turner a montré, à partir des rituels ndembu, que ces dispositifs +ne visent pas à désigner un responsable ou à trancher un conflit, mais à +reconfigurer l'ensemble du champ relationnel. Le désordre est déplacé +dans une scène symbolique où gestes, chants et objets permettent de +transformer la tension sans la réduire à une faute individuelle. -Chez les Dogon, les grandes cérémonies comme le sigui rejouent périodiquement l’ordre cosmologique et social, réinscrivant les relations entre vivants, ancêtres et monde dans une temporalité rituelle. La stabilité collective ne repose pas sur l’inertie, mais sur cette capacité à réactiver les formes qui la rendent possible. +Chez les Dogon, les grandes cérémonies comme le sigui rejouent +périodiquement l'ordre cosmologique et social, réinscrivant les +relations entre vivants, ancêtres et monde dans une temporalité +rituelle. La stabilité collective ne repose pas sur l'inertie, mais sur +cette capacité à réactiver les formes qui la rendent possible. -À cette régulation rythmique s’articule une régulation par la parole médiatisée. Comme l’a montré Pierre Clastres, certaines sociétés organisent la fonction de chef comme une parole sans pouvoir : il parle, mais ne commande pas. Sa fonction est de maintenir un espace d’écoute, de reformuler les tensions et de les inscrire dans une mémoire partagée. +À cette régulation rythmique s'articule une régulation par la parole +médiatisée. Comme l'a montré Pierre Clastres, certaines sociétés +organisent la fonction de chef comme une parole sans pouvoir : il parle, +mais ne commande pas. Sa fonction est de maintenir un espace d'écoute, +de reformuler les tensions et de les inscrire dans une mémoire partagée. -Dans cette même logique, les dispositifs divinatoires comme l’Ifá yoruba ne produisent pas de décision immédiate, mais ouvrent un espace d’interprétation. La parole y est toujours relayée, jamais souveraine : elle oriente sans imposer, retarde la décision et la rend collective. +Dans cette même logique, les dispositifs divinatoires comme l'Ifá yoruba +ne produisent pas de décision immédiate, mais ouvrent un espace +d'interprétation. La parole y est toujours relayée, jamais souveraine : +elle oriente sans imposer, retarde la décision et la rend collective. -Ainsi, rituels cycliques et parole médiatisée participent d’une même logique archicratique : instituer des scènes où les tensions peuvent être reprises, transformées et redistribuées sans être captées par une instance centrale. +Ainsi, rituels cycliques et parole médiatisée participent d'une même +logique archicratique : instituer des scènes où les tensions peuvent +être reprises, transformées et redistribuées sans être captées par une +instance centrale. -La régulation ne passe pas ici par la résolution immédiate, mais par la temporalisation du lien : ce qui pourrait se figer en conflit est réinscrit dans un cycle, un récit ou une parole partagée. +La régulation ne passe pas ici par la résolution immédiate, mais par la +temporalisation du lien : ce qui pourrait se figer en conflit est +réinscrit dans un cycle, un récit ou une parole partagée. -Ces régimes sacrés non étatiques donnent à voir une forme de régulation hautement structurée, sans pouvoir central, sans légalité positive et sans appareil souverain. La co-viabilité y repose sur une pluralité de médiations — totémiques, rituelles, objectales, langagières, cycliques — par lesquelles les tensions sont différées, redistribuées et rendues traitables sans être captées par une instance unique. +Ces régimes sacrés non étatiques donnent à voir une forme de régulation +hautement structurée, sans pouvoir central, sans légalité positive et +sans appareil souverain. La co-viabilité y repose sur une pluralité de +médiations — totémiques, rituelles, objectales, langagières, cycliques — par lesquelles les tensions sont différées, redistribuées et rendues +traitables sans être captées par une instance unique. -Il ne s’agit ni d’un pré-politique confus, ni d’une étape inachevée vers l’État, mais d’une configuration archicratique spécifique. Le fondement s’y distribue dans des cosmologies, des récits, des interdits et des objets retirés ; la puissance circule dans les gestes, les rôles, les rythmes et les paroles relayées ; la scène régulatrice apparaît chaque fois qu’un seuil symbolique est institué pour permettre au collectif de traiter ce qui le traverse sans se livrer à la logique de la capture. +Il ne s'agit ni d'un pré-politique confus, ni d'une étape inachevée vers +l'État, mais d'une configuration archicratique spécifique. Le fondement +s'y distribue dans des cosmologies, des récits, des interdits et des +objets retirés ; la puissance circule dans les gestes, les rôles, les +rythmes et les paroles relayées ; la scène régulatrice apparaît chaque +fois qu'un seuil symbolique est institué pour permettre au collectif de +traiter ce qui le traverse sans se livrer à la logique de la capture. -Ce méta-régime montre ainsi qu’une société peut produire de la cohérence, stabiliser des positions, moduler les affects et contenir les violences sans recourir à la centralisation du commandement. L’ordre n’y procède pas de la décision souveraine, mais d’une orchestration symbolique du retrait, de la distance et de la médiation. Les archicrations sacrales non étatiques constituent en cela une forme pleinement intelligible et irréductible de co-viabilité. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. +Ce méta-régime montre ainsi qu'une société peut produire de la +cohérence, stabiliser des positions, moduler les affects et contenir les +violences sans recourir à la centralisation du commandement. L'ordre n'y +procède pas de la décision souveraine, mais d'une orchestration +symbolique du retrait, de la distance et de la médiation. Les +archicrations sacrales non étatiques constituent en cela une forme +pleinement intelligible et irréductible de co-viabilité. Un tableau de +synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. -Ces dispositifs rencontrent cependant leurs limites lorsque la densité démographique, la spécialisation fonctionnelle et la complexification des flux exigent des formes plus explicites de coordination et de mémorisation. C’est ce seuil que franchit la sous-section suivante. +Ces dispositifs rencontrent cependant leurs limites lorsque la densité +démographique, la spécialisation fonctionnelle et la complexification +des flux exigent des formes plus explicites de coordination et de +mémorisation. C'est ce seuil que franchit la sous-section suivante. ### 2.2.3 — *Archicrations* *techno-logistiques* -Entre la fin du Néolithique et l’émergence des premières cités, un seuil nouveau de complexité régulatrice est franchi. La mise en ordre du lien collectif n’est plus assurée principalement par le différé symbolique, le retrait sacral ou la médiation rituelle, mais par des dispositifs intégrés, durables et opératoires articulant formes spatiales, flux logistiques et fonctions spécialisées. +Entre la fin du Néolithique et l'émergence des premières cités, un seuil +nouveau de complexité régulatrice est franchi. La mise en ordre du lien +collectif n'est plus assurée principalement par le différé symbolique, +le retrait sacral ou la médiation rituelle, mais par des dispositifs +intégrés, durables et opératoires articulant formes spatiales, flux +logistiques et fonctions spécialisées. -C’est dans ce cadre que la notion de mégamachine, élaborée par Lewis Mumford, devient décisive. Elle ne désigne pas une machine au sens technique, mais une organisation sociale machinique capable de synchroniser des populations humaines élargies à travers la convergence d’architectures, de cadences, de tâches et de circuits. Ce qui change ici n’est pas d’abord l’intention politique des groupes, mais le plan d’effectuation de la régulation : on ne tient plus ensemble principalement par le mythe, le masque ou l’interdit, mais par l’agencement fonctionnel des opérations. +C'est dans ce cadre que la notion de mégamachine, élaborée par Lewis +Mumford, devient décisive. Elle ne désigne pas une machine au sens +technique, mais une organisation sociale machinique capable de +synchroniser des populations humaines élargies à travers la convergence +d'architectures, de cadences, de tâches et de circuits. Ce qui change +ici n'est pas d'abord l'intention politique des groupes, mais le plan +d'effectuation de la régulation : on ne tient plus ensemble +principalement par le mythe, le masque ou l'interdit, mais par +l'agencement fonctionnel des opérations. -Le régime techno-logistique n’efface pas brutalement les formes antérieures ; il les recompose et les intègre dans une logique plus abstraite, plus visible et plus coordonnée. Le rituel peut subsister, mais il ne suffit plus à lui seul à réguler. L’ordre se matérialise désormais dans la disposition des lieux, dans l’organisation des accès, dans la distribution des tâches, dans la continuité des flux et dans la répétition des séquences. +Le régime techno-logistique n'efface pas brutalement les formes +antérieures ; il les recompose et les intègre dans une logique plus +abstraite, plus visible et plus coordonnée. Le rituel peut subsister, +mais il ne suffit plus à lui seul à réguler. L'ordre se matérialise +désormais dans la disposition des lieux, dans l'organisation des accès, +dans la distribution des tâches, dans la continuité des flux et dans la +répétition des séquences. -Il ne s’agit pas encore de l’État au sens plein, avec souveraineté incarnée, juridicité explicite et centralisation normative. Ce qui tend à émerger, dans ces configurations, est un régime archicratique plus anonyme, plus machinique et plus impersonnel, où l’arcalité se spatialise, où la cratialité se distribue dans les fonctions et les efforts, et où l’archicration se déplace vers une coordination opératoire des segments, des rythmes et des usages. C’est cette mutation que donnent à voir les premières configurations urbaines et logistiques de grande échelle. +Il ne s'agit pas encore de l'État au sens plein, avec souveraineté +incarnée, juridicité explicite et centralisation normative. Ce qui tend +à émerger, dans ces configurations, est un régime archicratique plus +anonyme, plus machinique et plus impersonnel, où l'arcalité se +spatialise, où la cratialité se distribue dans les fonctions et les +efforts, et où l'archicration se déplace vers une coordination +opératoire des segments, des rythmes et des usages. C'est cette mutation +que donnent à voir les premières configurations urbaines et logistiques +de grande échelle. -L’un des traits les plus décisifs de ce régime est sa capacité à produire de la régulation par organisation spatiale et segmentation fonctionnelle. La co-viabilité n’y est plus principalement articulée autour d’une scène rituelle ou d’un cycle symbolique, mais à travers des dispositifs intégrés où formes architecturales, circulations et fonctions spécialisées composent une structuration opératoire de grande échelle. +L'un des traits les plus décisifs de ce régime est sa capacité à +produire de la régulation par organisation spatiale et segmentation +fonctionnelle. La co-viabilité n'y est plus principalement articulée +autour d'une scène rituelle ou d'un cycle symbolique, mais à travers des +dispositifs intégrés où formes architecturales, circulations et +fonctions spécialisées composent une structuration opératoire de grande +échelle. -Cette logique apparaît avec netteté dans les premières configurations urbaines de Mésopotamie méridionale, notamment à Uruk, entre le IVᵉ et le IIIᵉ millénaire avant notre ère. Les grands ensembles monumentaux — ziggourats, temples, espaces administratifs — ne relèvent pas d’un ornement symbolique, mais d’une structuration spatiale du lien collectif. Ils fixent les places, organisent les circulations et distribuent les accès. L’arcalité s’y matérialise dans l’orientation des axes, la hiérarchisation des volumes et l’assignation fonctionnelle des zones. +Cette logique apparaît avec netteté dans les premières configurations +urbaines de Mésopotamie méridionale, notamment à Uruk, entre le IVᵉ et +le IIIᵉ millénaire avant notre ère. Les grands ensembles monumentaux — ziggourats, temples, espaces administratifs — ne relèvent pas d'un +ornement symbolique, mais d'une structuration spatiale du lien +collectif. Ils fixent les places, organisent les circulations et +distribuent les accès. L'arcalité s'y matérialise dans l'orientation des +axes, la hiérarchisation des volumes et l'assignation fonctionnelle des +zones. -Autour du complexe de l’Eanna, dédié à Inanna, cette structuration atteint un degré remarquable de précision. L’enchaînement des seuils, la différenciation des niveaux et la distribution des parcours produisent une modulation progressive des statuts. Franchir un espace, c’est changer de position dans l’ordre collectif. La régulation ne procède pas d’un énoncé, mais de la configuration même du lieu. +Autour du complexe de l'Eanna, dédié à Inanna, cette structuration +atteint un degré remarquable de précision. L'enchaînement des seuils, la +différenciation des niveaux et la distribution des parcours produisent +une modulation progressive des statuts. Franchir un espace, c'est +changer de position dans l'ordre collectif. La régulation ne procède pas +d'un énoncé, mais de la configuration même du lieu. -Ce principe se retrouve, sous une autre forme, dans l’urbanisme planifié de la vallée de l’Indus, notamment à Mohenjo-Daro. La division entre citadelle surélevée et ville basse, l’uniformisation des matériaux, l’organisation des réseaux hydrauliques et la présence d’équipements collectifs traduisent une mise en ordre systémique. L’espace y fonctionne comme matrice de régularité : il rend les usages prévisibles, les circulations compatibles et les fonctions ajustables. +Ce principe se retrouve, sous une autre forme, dans l'urbanisme planifié +de la vallée de l'Indus, notamment à Mohenjo-Daro. La division entre +citadelle surélevée et ville basse, l'uniformisation des matériaux, +l'organisation des réseaux hydrauliques et la présence d'équipements +collectifs traduisent une mise en ordre systémique. L'espace y +fonctionne comme matrice de régularité : il rend les usages prévisibles, +les circulations compatibles et les fonctions ajustables. -Des configurations analogues apparaissent en Égypte prédynastique, dès Nagada II. L’organisation des complexes funéraires, la structuration des zones d’activité et la monumentalisation progressive des enceintes traduisent une différenciation spatiale des positions et des rôles. L’ordre social s’y inscrit dans la disposition des lieux, sans nécessité d’être formulé comme règle explicite. +Des configurations analogues apparaissent en Égypte prédynastique, dès +Nagada II. L'organisation des complexes funéraires, la structuration des +zones d'activité et la monumentalisation progressive des enceintes +traduisent une différenciation spatiale des positions et des rôles. +L'ordre social s'y inscrit dans la disposition des lieux, sans nécessité +d'être formulé comme règle explicite. -Dans l’ensemble de ces cas, la régulation passe de plus en plus visiblement par la configuration même de l’espace, sans que disparaissent pour autant le récit, l’interdit ou la médiation symbolique qui continuent d’en orienter certains usages. L’arcalité se construit, la cratialité se distribue dans les parcours et les affectations, et l’archicration s’opère à travers l’ajustement continu des positions dans une structure qui oriente sans avoir à se dire. +Dans l'ensemble de ces cas, la régulation passe de plus en plus +visiblement par la configuration même de l'espace, sans que +disparaissent pour autant le récit, l'interdit ou la médiation +symbolique qui continuent d'en orienter certains usages. L'arcalité se +construit, la cratialité se distribue dans les parcours et les +affectations, et l'archicration s'opère à travers l'ajustement continu +des positions dans une structure qui oriente sans avoir à se dire. -Plus qu’une architecture de l’espace, la mégamachine se donne comme une écologie politique des flux matériels. L’extraction, le stockage, la circulation et la redistribution des ressources n’y sont pas des opérations secondaires : elles constituent le cœur même de la régulation, en structurant les manques, les parcours et les tensions. +Plus qu'une architecture de l'espace, la mégamachine se donne comme une +écologie politique des flux matériels. L'extraction, le stockage, la +circulation et la redistribution des ressources n'y sont pas des +opérations secondaires : elles constituent le cœur même de la +régulation, en structurant les manques, les parcours et les tensions. -Cette logique est visible dans les grands silos, les enceintes de stockage et les réseaux hydrauliques attestés à Tell Brak, Mari ou Lagash. L’eau, le grain, l’huile et les réserves ne sont pas seulement des biens vitaux : ils deviennent des opérateurs de structuration, parce qu’ils organisent les accès, hiérarchisent les usages et répartissent les responsabilités. L’arcalité tend ici à se déposer dans les infrastructures elles-mêmes, dans les tracés, les réserves et les dispositifs de mesure, qui deviennent les relais concrets d’un ordre opératoire. +Cette logique est visible dans les grands silos, les enceintes de +stockage et les réseaux hydrauliques attestés à Tell Brak, Mari ou +Lagash. L'eau, le grain, l'huile et les réserves ne sont pas seulement +des biens vitaux : ils deviennent des opérateurs de structuration, parce +qu'ils organisent les accès, hiérarchisent les usages et répartissent +les responsabilités. L'arcalité tend ici à se déposer dans les +infrastructures elles-mêmes, dans les tracés, les réserves et les +dispositifs de mesure, qui deviennent les relais concrets d'un ordre +opératoire. -La cratialité, quant à elle, se mobilise dans la répartition des tâches, dans l’affectation des efforts et dans la calibration des séquences productives. Les tablettes d’assignation de Nippur montrent déjà une distribution précise des fonctions selon les jours, les secteurs et les rendements. La puissance n’est plus contenue dans une scène rituelle : elle devient énergie canalisée, effort réparti, activité rendue compatible avec l’ensemble du système. +La cratialité, quant à elle, se mobilise dans la répartition des tâches, +dans l'affectation des efforts et dans la calibration des séquences +productives. Les tablettes d'assignation de Nippur montrent déjà une +distribution précise des fonctions selon les jours, les secteurs et les +rendements. La puissance n'est plus contenue dans une scène rituelle : +elle devient énergie canalisée, effort réparti, activité rendue +compatible avec l'ensemble du système. -À Ebla, les archives administratives du palais G donnent à voir une autre dimension de cette mutation : la lisibilité des flux. Les inventaires, les quotas et les suivis de circulation n’instaurent pas encore un ordre juridique autonome, mais ils permettent de maintenir la coordination matérielle à grande échelle. L’archicration ne se situe plus principalement dans un rite ou une parole différée : elle prend la forme d’une séquence opératoire continue, où la régulation tient à la possibilité de suivre, d’ajuster et de transmettre les opérations. +À Ebla, les archives administratives du palais G donnent à voir une +autre dimension de cette mutation : la lisibilité des flux. Les +inventaires, les quotas et les suivis de circulation n'instaurent pas +encore un ordre juridique autonome, mais ils permettent de maintenir la +coordination matérielle à grande échelle. L'archicration ne se situe +plus principalement dans un rite ou une parole différée : elle prend la +forme d'une séquence opératoire continue, où la régulation tient à la +possibilité de suivre, d'ajuster et de transmettre les opérations. -Dans un tel régime, l’interdépendance matérielle devient elle-même principe de cohérence collective. Le canal, le silo, la réserve, la pesée ou l’inventaire ne se contentent pas d’accompagner le lien social : ils en assurent la tenue concrète. La mégamachine ne gouverne pas en disant ce qu’il faut faire ; elle régule en rendant possible ce qui doit être effectué, maintenu et redistribué. +Dans un tel régime, l'interdépendance matérielle devient elle-même +principe de cohérence collective. Le canal, le silo, la réserve, la +pesée ou l'inventaire ne se contentent pas d'accompagner le lien social +: ils en assurent la tenue concrète. La mégamachine ne gouverne pas en +disant ce qu'il faut faire ; elle régule en rendant possible ce qui doit +être effectué, maintenu et redistribué. -Ce régime techno-logistique, s’il trouve des expressions particulièrement précoces et puissantes dans les bassins fluviaux de Mésopotamie et de la vallée de l’Indus, ne s’y réduit pas. Sa singularité tient précisément à sa plasticité : il peut émerger dans des contextes écologiques et symboliques très différents, dès lors qu’une société parvient à stabiliser sa co-viabilité à travers l’agencement de formes, de flux et de fonctions. +Ce régime techno-logistique, s'il trouve des expressions +particulièrement précoces et puissantes dans les bassins fluviaux de +Mésopotamie et de la vallée de l'Indus, ne s'y réduit pas. Sa +singularité tient précisément à sa plasticité : il peut émerger dans des +contextes écologiques et symboliques très différents, dès lors qu'une +société parvient à stabiliser sa co-viabilité à travers l'agencement de +formes, de flux et de fonctions. -Caral-Supe, au Pérou, en offre une première variation remarquable. Dans ce complexe côtier pré-céramique, sans écriture ni appareil coercitif centralisé, l’organisation de pyramides, de terrasses, d’amphithéâtres et de structures de stockage dessine une infrastructure de grande échelle où la régulation passe par la forme bâtie, la circulation des ressources et la coordination inter-vallées. L’arcalité s’y inscrit dans l’agencement monumental, la cratialité dans la mobilisation continue des énergies humaines et des échanges, et l’archicration dans une synchronisation cérémonielle du territoire qui distribue les parcours et les accès sans recourir à un centre souverain visible. +Caral-Supe, au Pérou, en offre une première variation remarquable. Dans +ce complexe côtier pré-céramique, sans écriture ni appareil coercitif +centralisé, l'organisation de pyramides, de terrasses, d'amphithéâtres +et de structures de stockage dessine une infrastructure de grande +échelle où la régulation passe par la forme bâtie, la circulation des +ressources et la coordination inter-vallées. L'arcalité s'y inscrit dans +l'agencement monumental, la cratialité dans la mobilisation continue des +énergies humaines et des échanges, et l'archicration dans une +synchronisation cérémonielle du territoire qui distribue les parcours et +les accès sans recourir à un centre souverain visible. -Sanxingdui, dans le Sichuan, donne à voir une autre déclinaison du même régime. Ici, la production du bronze, la séparation des chaînes opératoires, l’accumulation rituelle et l’enfouissement différentiel des objets composent une régulation où la cohérence collective repose sur la coordination des séquences de production, de stockage et de retrait. L’ordre n’y est pas proclamé : il se tient dans l’agencement des procédés, la hiérarchisation implicite des fonctions et la scénographie matérielle de l’enfouissement. +Sanxingdui, dans le Sichuan, donne à voir une autre déclinaison du même +régime. Ici, la production du bronze, la séparation des chaînes +opératoires, l'accumulation rituelle et l'enfouissement différentiel des +objets composent une régulation où la cohérence collective repose sur la +coordination des séquences de production, de stockage et de retrait. +L'ordre n'y est pas proclamé : il se tient dans l'agencement des +procédés, la hiérarchisation implicite des fonctions et la scénographie +matérielle de l'enfouissement. -Ces deux cas montrent que la mégamachine n’est ni un modèle unique, ni une simple étape vers l’État. Elle constitue un type archicratique différencié, capable de produire de la cohérence sans bureaucratie explicite ni souveraineté centralisée, dès lors qu’un système parvient à rendre compatibles les formes, les flux et les opérations qui assurent la tenue du collectif. +Ces deux cas montrent que la mégamachine n'est ni un modèle unique, ni +une simple étape vers l'État. Elle constitue un type archicratique +différencié, capable de produire de la cohérence sans bureaucratie +explicite ni souveraineté centralisée, dès lors qu'un système parvient à +rendre compatibles les formes, les flux et les opérations qui assurent +la tenue du collectif. -Dans le régime techno-logistique, l’une des inflexions décisives de la régulation réside dans l’apparition de supports de traçabilité, de standards opératoires et de séquences temporelles capables d’assurer la continuité des opérations sans recours constant à la médiation rituelle ou à la parole. La régulation ne repose plus seulement sur des formes visibles ou sur la coordination des flux matériels : elle s’inscrit désormais dans des dispositifs qui rendent les activités suivables, comparables et ajustables. +Dans le régime techno-logistique, l'une des inflexions décisives de la +régulation réside dans l'apparition de supports de traçabilité, de +standards opératoires et de séquences temporelles capables d'assurer la +continuité des opérations sans recours constant à la médiation rituelle +ou à la parole. La régulation ne repose plus seulement sur des formes +visibles ou sur la coordination des flux matériels : elle s'inscrit +désormais dans des dispositifs qui rendent les activités suivables, +comparables et ajustables. -Les premières tablettes proto-cunéiformes d’Uruk IV, étudiées notamment par Hans J. Nissen, témoignent de cette mutation. Elles ne fondent pas encore un ordre juridique autonome, mais permettent de suivre des biens, des tâches et des affectations. De même, les standards de mesure — sila, gur, mina — et les unités de stockage rendent les flux compatibles entre eux. L’arcalité se déplace ici vers des supports matériels de stabilisation : sceaux, tablettes, pesées, marques et métriques deviennent les relais concrets d’un ordre opératoire. +Les premières tablettes proto-cunéiformes d'Uruk IV, étudiées notamment +par Hans J. Nissen, témoignent de cette mutation. Elles ne fondent pas +encore un ordre juridique autonome, mais permettent de suivre des biens, +des tâches et des affectations. De même, les standards de mesure — sila, gur, mina — et les unités de stockage rendent les flux +compatibles entre eux. L'arcalité se déplace ici vers des supports +matériels de stabilisation : sceaux, tablettes, pesées, marques et +métriques deviennent les relais concrets d'un ordre opératoire. -La cratialité, dans ce contexte, se mobilise à travers la répartition des efforts, la calibration des rendements et la distribution temporelle des activités. Les tablettes de Shuruppak, de Nippur ou d’Ebla montrent déjà une logique de coordination où l’énergie humaine est affectée, séquencée et rendue disponible selon des fonctions déterminées. On peut voir apparaître ici une forme minimale d’archicration, non plus concentrée dans une scène rituelle distincte, mais déplacée vers la possibilité de suivre, corriger, transmettre et reprendre les opérations sans rupture du circuit. +La cratialité, dans ce contexte, se mobilise à travers la répartition +des efforts, la calibration des rendements et la distribution temporelle +des activités. Les tablettes de Shuruppak, de Nippur ou d'Ebla montrent +déjà une logique de coordination où l'énergie humaine est affectée, +séquencée et rendue disponible selon des fonctions déterminées. On peut +voir apparaître ici une forme minimale d'archicration, non plus +concentrée dans une scène rituelle distincte, mais déplacée vers la +possibilité de suivre, corriger, transmettre et reprendre les opérations +sans rupture du circuit. -Cette mutation s’approfondit lorsque le temps lui-même devient opérateur de régulation. Les calendriers mésopotamiens, associés aux récoltes, aux prélèvements, aux tournées de collecte ou aux périodes de stockage, ne se contentent plus d’accompagner le rythme cosmique : ils organisent des séquences opératoires, répartissent les charges et rendent prévisible la coordination des actes. Le temps cesse d’être principalement cyclique ou cérémoniel ; il devient aussi linéaire, cumulatif et programmatique. +Cette mutation s'approfondit lorsque le temps lui-même devient opérateur +de régulation. Les calendriers mésopotamiens, associés aux récoltes, aux +prélèvements, aux tournées de collecte ou aux périodes de stockage, ne +se contentent plus d'accompagner le rythme cosmique : ils organisent des +séquences opératoires, répartissent les charges et rendent prévisible la +coordination des actes. Le temps cesse d'être principalement cyclique ou +cérémoniel ; il devient aussi linéaire, cumulatif et programmatique. -Dans un tel régime, la régulation ne passe plus par l’événement rituel, mais par la tenue des séquences, la répétition des tâches et la compatibilité des échéances. La mémoire elle-même n’est plus seulement oralisée ou mythique : elle est inscrite, datée, comptée, objectivée. Ce qui se met alors en place, ce n’est pas une simple administration froide, mais une infrastructure de comparution continue, dans laquelle le collectif se maintient parce que les flux, les charges, les mesures et les rythmes peuvent être coordonnés à grande échelle. +Dans un tel régime, la régulation ne passe plus par l'événement rituel, +mais par la tenue des séquences, la répétition des tâches et la +compatibilité des échéances. La mémoire elle-même n'est plus seulement +oralisée ou mythique : elle est inscrite, datée, comptée, objectivée. Ce +qui se met alors en place, ce n'est pas une simple administration +froide, mais une infrastructure de comparution continue, dans laquelle +le collectif se maintient parce que les flux, les charges, les mesures +et les rythmes peuvent être coordonnés à grande échelle. -On peut enfin parler, à titre secondaire, d’une somato-normativité techno-logistique, dès lors que les corps eux-mêmes deviennent les supports incorporés de ces cadences, de ces tolérances et de ces séquences. Il ne s’agit pas d’un archétype autonome, mais d’un pli interne du régime : la norme se manifeste ici dans l’endurance, dans l’usure, dans les rythmes imposés, dans les seuils de tolérance que l’organisation exige et révèle tout à la fois. +On peut enfin parler, à titre secondaire, d'une somato-normativité +techno-logistique, dès lors que les corps eux-mêmes deviennent les +supports incorporés de ces cadences, de ces tolérances et de ces +séquences. Il ne s'agit pas d'un archétype autonome, mais d'un pli +interne du régime : la norme se manifeste ici dans l'endurance, dans +l'usure, dans les rythmes imposés, dans les seuils de tolérance que +l'organisation exige et révèle tout à la fois. -La mégamachine techno-logistique peut être traitée comme une forme archicratique autonome, dès lors que la co-viabilité y repose principalement sur la coordination continue des formes, des flux, des mesures et des séquences, davantage que sur le seul récit, le rite ou l’interdit. L’ordre n’y émane ni d’un centre visible ni d’une parole souveraine : il se diffuse à travers l’agencement des infrastructures, la compatibilité des opérations et la tenue des rythmes qui rendent la reproduction collective possible. +La mégamachine techno-logistique peut être traitée comme une forme +archicratique autonome, dès lors que la co-viabilité y repose +principalement sur la coordination continue des formes, des flux, des +mesures et des séquences, davantage que sur le seul récit, le rite ou +l'interdit. L'ordre n'y émane ni d'un centre visible ni d'une parole +souveraine : il se diffuse à travers l'agencement des infrastructures, +la compatibilité des opérations et la tenue des rythmes qui rendent la +reproduction collective possible. -Il ne s’agit pas d’un simple prélude à l’État, ni d’une rationalisation purement technique du lien social. Ce régime possède sa consistance propre : l’arcalité y est architecture et métrique, la cratialité mobilisée et distribuée dans les tâches, les charges et les circuits, l’archicration assurée par la continuité procédurale des opérations. La régulation ne s’y donne plus comme scène symbolique centrale, mais comme maintien systémique d’un ordre opératoire capable d’absorber les tensions sans avoir à les représenter pleinement. +Il ne s'agit pas d'un simple prélude à l'État, ni d'une rationalisation +purement technique du lien social. Ce régime possède sa consistance +propre : l'arcalité y est architecture et métrique, la cratialité +mobilisée et distribuée dans les tâches, les charges et les circuits, +l'archicration assurée par la continuité procédurale des opérations. La +régulation ne s'y donne plus comme scène symbolique centrale, mais comme +maintien systémique d'un ordre opératoire capable d'absorber les +tensions sans avoir à les représenter pleinement. -Ce méta-régime révèle ainsi une mutation décisive : la possibilité, pour une société, de tenir ensemble par l’efficacité coordonnée de ses agencements plutôt que par la seule intensité de ses croyances communes. Il fait de cette coordination un type irréductible de co-viabilité. +Ce méta-régime révèle ainsi une mutation décisive : la possibilité, pour +une société, de tenir ensemble par l'efficacité coordonnée de ses +agencements plutôt que par la seule intensité de ses croyances communes. +Il fait de cette coordination un type irréductible de co-viabilité. -Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. Cette continuité opératoire ouvre bientôt sur un autre seuil : celui où la coordination des flux cesse d’être seulement logistique pour devenir explicitement scripturale, normative et institutionnellement stabilisée. +Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. Cette +continuité opératoire ouvre bientôt sur un autre seuil : celui où la +coordination des flux cesse d'être seulement logistique pour devenir +explicitement scripturale, normative et institutionnellement stabilisée. ### 2.2.4 — *Archicrations scripturo-normatives* -À partir du tournant du troisième millénaire avant notre ère, dans plusieurs régions du Croissant fertile, un nouveau mode de régulation se constitue, distinct des méta-régimes sacraux et techno-logistiques, sans pour autant s’en détacher absolument. Ce qui émerge alors n’est plus une coordination des flux ou une stabilisation symbolique du lien, mais une normativité appuyée sur l’inscription : la règle peut être écrite, conservée, reproduite, invoquée et réactivée en l’absence de son énonciateur. +À partir du tournant du troisième millénaire avant notre ère, dans +plusieurs régions du Croissant fertile, un nouveau mode de régulation se +constitue, distinct des méta-régimes sacraux et techno-logistiques, sans +pour autant s'en détacher absolument. Ce qui émerge alors n'est plus une +coordination des flux ou une stabilisation symbolique du lien, mais une +normativité appuyée sur l'inscription : la règle peut être écrite, +conservée, reproduite, invoquée et réactivée en l'absence de son +énonciateur. -L’archicration scripturo-normative ne se réduit ni à un simple progrès des techniques de mémoire, ni à une extension des dispositifs administratifs. Elle correspond à une mutation de la validité sociale elle-même : l’obligation ne vaut plus seulement par sa ritualisation, sa matérialité ou son incorporation, mais de plus en plus par sa formulation sous une forme traçable, reproductible et opposable. L’écriture cesse d’enregistrer ce qui est ; elle devient l’un des médiums par lesquels se fixe ce qui doit être. +L'archicration scripturo-normative ne se réduit ni à un simple progrès +des techniques de mémoire, ni à une extension des dispositifs +administratifs. Elle correspond à une mutation de la validité sociale +elle-même : l'obligation ne vaut plus seulement par sa ritualisation, sa +matérialité ou son incorporation, mais de plus en plus par sa +formulation sous une forme traçable, reproductible et opposable. +L'écriture cesse d'enregistrer ce qui est ; elle devient l'un des +médiums par lesquels se fixe ce qui doit être. -Dans ce régime, l’arcalité se recompose à travers des listes, des registres, des catégories, des généalogies et des formules typées qui stabilisent les appartenances et les places. Comme l’a montré Jack Goody, l’écriture opère une double dissociation : elle externalise la mémoire et détache l’autorité de la parole immédiate. La norme devient alors cumulable, duplicable, transportable et mobilisable dans des contextes différés. +Dans ce régime, l'arcalité se recompose à travers des listes, des +registres, des catégories, des généalogies et des formules typées qui +stabilisent les appartenances et les places. Comme l'a montré Jack +Goody, l'écriture opère une double dissociation : elle externalise la +mémoire et détache l'autorité de la parole immédiate. La norme devient +alors cumulable, duplicable, transportable et mobilisable dans des +contextes différés. -La cratialité, dès lors, ne repose plus seulement sur la présence d’un centre ou sur l’effectuation matérielle d’un ordre, mais sur la capacité d’un contenu écrit à activer des conduites, à encadrer des actions et à servir de référence dans un différend. Quant à l’archicration, elle se déploie dans l’écart entre l’inscription normative et les situations concrètes où celle-ci doit être reconnue, interprétée, ajustée et rendue opératoire. C’est cette configuration que donnent à voir les premières formes de juridicité et d’archivage scriptural en Mésopotamie. +La cratialité, dès lors, ne repose plus seulement sur la présence d'un +centre ou sur l'effectuation matérielle d'un ordre, mais sur la capacité +d'un contenu écrit à activer des conduites, à encadrer des actions et à +servir de référence dans un différend. Quant à l'archicration, elle se +déploie dans l'écart entre l'inscription normative et les situations +concrètes où celle-ci doit être reconnue, interprétée, ajustée et rendue +opératoire. C'est cette configuration que donnent à voir les premières +formes de juridicité et d'archivage scriptural en Mésopotamie. -Les premières manifestations claires de cette dynamique se trouvent à Lagash et à Ur, à la fin du IIIe millénaire avant notre ère. Le code d’Ur-Nammu, souvent considéré comme l’un des premiers ensembles normatifs formulés de manière conditionnelle, marque un seuil important : l’écrit n’y enregistre plus seulement des transactions ou des affectations, il formule des règles transmissibles et susceptibles d’être invoquées dans le traitement des différends. Il faut certes se garder des lectures téléologiques qui en feraient le simple prélude du droit moderne ; mais il reste que l’inscription y acquiert une puissance de validité autonome, irréductible à la seule oralité rituelle ou à la présence d’une autorité incarnée. +Les premières manifestations claires de cette dynamique se trouvent à +Lagash et à Ur, à la fin du IIIe millénaire avant notre ère. Le code +d'Ur-Nammu, souvent considéré comme l'un des premiers ensembles +normatifs formulés de manière conditionnelle, marque un seuil important +: l'écrit n'y enregistre plus seulement des transactions ou des +affectations, il formule des règles transmissibles et susceptibles +d'être invoquées dans le traitement des différends. Il faut certes se +garder des lectures téléologiques qui en feraient le simple prélude du +droit moderne ; mais il reste que l'inscription y acquiert une puissance +de validité autonome, irréductible à la seule oralité rituelle ou à la +présence d'une autorité incarnée. -Dans ce régime, les scribes occupent une fonction décisive. Ils ne gouvernent pas à proprement parler, mais rendent possible l’activation des normes en stabilisant, vérifiant, recopiant et transmettant les inscriptions. Leur autorité ne repose pas sur une souveraineté personnelle, mais sur leur place dans une chaîne de validation scripturale. Loin d’effacer les hiérarchies, cette médiation les reconfigure : le pouvoir passe par ceux qui savent produire, lire et faire valoir les formes écrites reconnues comme légitimes. +Dans ce régime, les scribes occupent une fonction décisive. Ils ne +gouvernent pas à proprement parler, mais rendent possible l'activation +des normes en stabilisant, vérifiant, recopiant et transmettant les +inscriptions. Leur autorité ne repose pas sur une souveraineté +personnelle, mais sur leur place dans une chaîne de validation +scripturale. Loin d'effacer les hiérarchies, cette médiation les +reconfigure : le pouvoir passe par ceux qui savent produire, lire et +faire valoir les formes écrites reconnues comme légitimes. -Cette logique se donne pleinement à voir dans les grandes pratiques d’archivage, notamment à Mari. Les tablettes conservées dans les palais n’y constituent pas une mémoire inerte, mais une infrastructure active de régulation : elles sont classées, relues, confrontées et réactivées selon les situations. L’archicration scripturo-normative se laisse ici comprendre moins comme l’application automatique d’une règle fixée une fois pour toutes que comme la capacité à mobiliser des inscriptions disponibles dans un champ de références hiérarchisées. +Cette logique se donne pleinement à voir dans les grandes pratiques +d'archivage, notamment à Mari. Les tablettes conservées dans les palais +n'y constituent pas une mémoire inerte, mais une infrastructure active +de régulation : elles sont classées, relues, confrontées et réactivées +selon les situations. L'archicration scripturo-normative se laisse ici +comprendre moins comme l'application automatique d'une règle fixée une +fois pour toutes que comme la capacité à mobiliser des inscriptions +disponibles dans un champ de références hiérarchisées. -Les contrats retrouvés à Larsa, Sippar ou Eshnunna confirment cette plasticité. Comme l’a montré Dominique Charpin, les clauses y sont relativement stables, mais leur activation varie selon les contextes, les annotations, les copies, les suppressions ou les lectures situées. L’écriture ne dicte pas mécaniquement la décision : elle rend possible un arbitrage fondé sur des énoncés de référence, des statuts reconnus, des témoins, des duplicata et des supports conservés. La norme n’y vaut donc pas indépendamment de son inscription, mais par sa capacité à être convoquée, comparée et rendue opératoire dans un cas donné. +Les contrats retrouvés à Larsa, Sippar ou Eshnunna confirment cette +plasticité. Comme l'a montré Dominique Charpin, les clauses y sont +relativement stables, mais leur activation varie selon les contextes, +les annotations, les copies, les suppressions ou les lectures situées. +L'écriture ne dicte pas mécaniquement la décision : elle rend possible +un arbitrage fondé sur des énoncés de référence, des statuts reconnus, +des témoins, des duplicata et des supports conservés. La norme n'y vaut +donc pas indépendamment de son inscription, mais par sa capacité à être +convoquée, comparée et rendue opératoire dans un cas donné. -La normativité scripturale repose sur des structures concrètes : formules conditionnelles, listes de parties, clauses typées, registres d’identification, séquences de validation, hiérarchies d’énoncés. Il ne s’agit pas d’un code figé au sens moderne, mais d’une grammaire opératoire qui rend les situations comparables, les obligations formulables et les différends traitables. La règle écrite n’abolit pas le conflit ; elle en encadre le traitement à travers des formes stabilisées d’énonciation. +La normativité scripturale repose sur des structures concrètes : +formules conditionnelles, listes de parties, clauses typées, registres +d'identification, séquences de validation, hiérarchies d'énoncés. Il ne +s'agit pas d'un code figé au sens moderne, mais d'une grammaire +opératoire qui rend les situations comparables, les obligations +formulables et les différends traitables. La règle écrite n'abolit pas +le conflit ; elle en encadre le traitement à travers des formes +stabilisées d'énonciation. -Cette logique ne se limite pas à la Mésopotamie paléo-babylonienne, même si celle-ci en offre l’un des foyers les plus denses. L’Égypte pharaonique, avec ses registres fiscaux, ses décrets et ses procédures administratives, manifeste elle aussi une scripturalité régulatrice, plus centralisée dans ses formes, mais comparable par ses effets de validation différée et de reconnaissance documentaire. Il s’agit donc moins d’un modèle unique que d’une famille de configurations où l’écriture devient médiation normative. +Cette logique ne se limite pas à la Mésopotamie paléo-babylonienne, même +si celle-ci en offre l'un des foyers les plus denses. L'Égypte +pharaonique, avec ses registres fiscaux, ses décrets et ses procédures +administratives, manifeste elle aussi une scripturalité régulatrice, +plus centralisée dans ses formes, mais comparable par ses effets de +validation différée et de reconnaissance documentaire. Il s'agit donc +moins d'un modèle unique que d'une famille de configurations où +l'écriture devient médiation normative. -L’une des expressions les plus précoces et les plus fortes de ce régime se trouve dans la scripturo-fiscalité et la logique cadastrale. Ici, la norme ne réside ni dans la proclamation ni dans l’interprétation doctrinale, mais dans l’exigibilité inscrite : listes de redevances, registres de tribut, comptes de grain, tablettes d’imposition ou cadastres rendent les obligations lisibles, calculables et périodiquement réactivables. Le texte agit alors à la fois comme fondement de ce qui est dû et comme dispositif où cette dette est exposée, assignée et reconduite. +L'une des expressions les plus précoces et les plus fortes de ce régime +se trouve dans la scripturo-fiscalité et la logique cadastrale. Ici, la +norme ne réside ni dans la proclamation ni dans l'interprétation +doctrinale, mais dans l'exigibilité inscrite : listes de redevances, +registres de tribut, comptes de grain, tablettes d'imposition ou +cadastres rendent les obligations lisibles, calculables et +périodiquement réactivables. Le texte agit alors à la fois comme +fondement de ce qui est dû et comme dispositif où cette dette est +exposée, assignée et reconduite. -La scène d’épreuve devient dès lors principalement documentaire : moins une arène discursive autonome qu’un espace d’inscription, de révision et, parfois, de rectification des obligations. La temporalité fiscale, rythmée par les levées, les révisions et les échéances, produit une cadence d’exigibilité dans laquelle l’écrit peut fonctionner soit comme simple répétition coercitive, soit comme support d’ajustement lorsqu’existent des formes de remise, de report ou de requalification. L’archicration scripturo-fiscale apparaît ainsi comme l’une des matrices les plus précoces de la régulation par inscription, activation et exécution différée. +La scène d'épreuve devient dès lors principalement documentaire : moins +une arène discursive autonome qu'un espace d'inscription, de révision +et, parfois, de rectification des obligations. La temporalité fiscale, +rythmée par les levées, les révisions et les échéances, produit une +cadence d'exigibilité dans laquelle l'écrit peut fonctionner soit comme +simple répétition coercitive, soit comme support d'ajustement +lorsqu'existent des formes de remise, de report ou de requalification. +L'archicration scripturo-fiscale apparaît ainsi comme l'une des matrices +les plus précoces de la régulation par inscription, activation et +exécution différée. -À mesure que l’écriture s’installe comme infrastructure de régulation, elle ne se borne plus à fixer des obligations : elle distribue des positions, des accès et des capacités de reconnaissance. Le statut social n’existe plus seulement par appartenance coutumière ou mémoire collective ; il acquiert une consistance nouvelle lorsqu’il peut être enregistré, attesté, invoqué et réinscrit dans une chaîne documentaire. Comme l’a montré Dominique Charpin à propos de Mari, ce que l’on appelle statut ou qualité n’est jamais une donnée brute : il dépend de sa possibilité d’être validé dans et par l’écrit. +À mesure que l'écriture s'installe comme infrastructure de régulation, +elle ne se borne plus à fixer des obligations : elle distribue des +positions, des accès et des capacités de reconnaissance. Le statut +social n'existe plus seulement par appartenance coutumière ou mémoire +collective ; il acquiert une consistance nouvelle lorsqu'il peut être +enregistré, attesté, invoqué et réinscrit dans une chaîne documentaire. +Comme l'a montré Dominique Charpin à propos de Mari, ce que l'on appelle +statut ou qualité n'est jamais une donnée brute : il dépend de sa +possibilité d'être validé dans et par l'écrit. -La cratialité, dans ce régime, se déplace alors vers la maîtrise des procédures d’inscription et d’activation. Savoir produire une clause, convoquer un précédent, faire valoir un témoignage écrit ou mobiliser un duplicata devient une capacité d’action régulatrice décisive. Cette asymétrie apparaît avec force dans les contrats de mariage, d’héritage ou d’émancipation, où tous les sujets ne disposent pas du même accès à la parole scripturale et à ses relais : certaines figures ne peuvent intervenir qu’au travers de représentants, de garants ou d’intercesseurs inscrits. +La cratialité, dans ce régime, se déplace alors vers la maîtrise des +procédures d'inscription et d'activation. Savoir produire une clause, +convoquer un précédent, faire valoir un témoignage écrit ou mobiliser un +duplicata devient une capacité d'action régulatrice décisive. Cette +asymétrie apparaît avec force dans les contrats de mariage, d'héritage +ou d'émancipation, où tous les sujets ne disposent pas du même accès à +la parole scripturale et à ses relais : certaines figures ne peuvent +intervenir qu'au travers de représentants, de garants ou d'intercesseurs +inscrits. -C’est dans le litige que cette logique se révèle pleinement. La régulation ne consiste pas à appliquer mécaniquement une norme, mais à faire reconnaître la pertinence d’un écrit dans une situation singulière. Contrats, sceaux, tablettes antérieures, duplicata, témoins et annotations composent alors un champ de preuves dont la hiérarchisation permet de stabiliser provisoirement un différend. L’archicration scripturo-normative se loge précisément dans cet espace d’activation, de comparaison et d’arbitrage entre inscriptions disponibles. +C'est dans le litige que cette logique se révèle pleinement. La +régulation ne consiste pas à appliquer mécaniquement une norme, mais à +faire reconnaître la pertinence d'un écrit dans une situation +singulière. Contrats, sceaux, tablettes antérieures, duplicata, témoins +et annotations composent alors un champ de preuves dont la +hiérarchisation permet de stabiliser provisoirement un différend. +L'archicration scripturo-normative se loge précisément dans cet espace +d'activation, de comparaison et d'arbitrage entre inscriptions +disponibles. -Cette efficacité dépend aussi d’une économie des supports. La matière du document, son lieu de conservation, sa visibilité, sa possibilité d’être copié ou transporté, tout cela participe à son autorité. Comme l’a montré Irene J. Winter, certains supports sont faits pour exposer, d’autres pour sceller, d’autres encore pour conserver une force légale sous retrait. Le support n’est donc jamais neutre : il hiérarchise, qualifie et structure la portée des énoncés. +Cette efficacité dépend aussi d'une économie des supports. La matière du +document, son lieu de conservation, sa visibilité, sa possibilité d'être +copié ou transporté, tout cela participe à son autorité. Comme l'a +montré Irene J. Winter, certains supports sont faits pour exposer, +d'autres pour sceller, d'autres encore pour conserver une force légale +sous retrait. Le support n'est donc jamais neutre : il hiérarchise, +qualifie et structure la portée des énoncés. -Il en résulte une régulation située, asymétrique et plastique. Elle ne suppose pas toujours un centre souverain ni une verticalité absolue : elle peut fonctionner par circulation des documents, interconnexion d’archives, reprise de précédents et ajustement des cas. Mais elle n’est pas pour autant égalitaire. L’écriture sélectionne, rend visibles certains liens, en médiatise d’autres, et distribue inégalement les capacités de reconnaissance. C’est en cela qu’elle constitue un régime archicratique spécifique : une grammaire documentaire de la validation, de la preuve et de l’ajustement différé. +Il en résulte une régulation située, asymétrique et plastique. Elle ne +suppose pas toujours un centre souverain ni une verticalité absolue : +elle peut fonctionner par circulation des documents, interconnexion +d'archives, reprise de précédents et ajustement des cas. Mais elle n'est +pas pour autant égalitaire. L'écriture sélectionne, rend visibles +certains liens, en médiatise d'autres, et distribue inégalement les +capacités de reconnaissance. C'est en cela qu'elle constitue un régime +archicratique spécifique : une grammaire documentaire de la validation, +de la preuve et de l'ajustement différé. -L’archicration scripturo-normative introduit une mutation décisive dans l’histoire des régulations : l’ordre peut désormais être formulé, conservé, réactivé et opposé au-delà de la présence de ceux qui l’énoncent. L’écriture n’est pas ici un simple auxiliaire de mémoire ou d’administration ; elle devient une infrastructure de validité, capable de stabiliser des obligations, de différer leur activation et d’organiser la reconnaissance à travers des chaînes documentaires. +L'archicration scripturo-normative introduit une mutation décisive dans +l'histoire des régulations : l'ordre peut désormais être formulé, +conservé, réactivé et opposé au-delà de la présence de ceux qui +l'énoncent. L'écriture n'est pas ici un simple auxiliaire de mémoire ou +d'administration ; elle devient une infrastructure de validité, capable +de stabiliser des obligations, de différer leur activation et +d'organiser la reconnaissance à travers des chaînes documentaires. -Ce régime ne produit pas seulement de la continuité : il distribue aussi des asymétries. Tous n’accèdent pas de la même manière à l’inscription, à la lecture, à la preuve ou à la capacité de faire valoir un texte. La normativité scripturale sélectionne, hiérarchise et rend visibles certains liens plutôt que d’autres. En cela, elle ne supprime ni le conflit ni l’interprétation ; elle les reconfigure dans un espace documentaire où les différends deviennent traitables à travers des formes écrites, des supports reconnus et des procédures d’activation différée. +Ce régime ne produit pas seulement de la continuité : il distribue aussi +des asymétries. Tous n'accèdent pas de la même manière à l'inscription, +à la lecture, à la preuve ou à la capacité de faire valoir un texte. La +normativité scripturale sélectionne, hiérarchise et rend visibles +certains liens plutôt que d'autres. En cela, elle ne supprime ni le +conflit ni l'interprétation ; elle les reconfigure dans un espace +documentaire où les différends deviennent traitables à travers des +formes écrites, des supports reconnus et des procédures d'activation +différée. -Ce méta-régime montre ainsi qu’une société peut produire de la co-viabilité non plus seulement par le rite, la fonction ou l’agencement matériel, mais par une grammaire documentaire de l’obligation, de la preuve et de la reconnaissance. L’écriture y apparaît comme un opérateur archicratique central : elle stabilise, qualifie, rend plus aisément mobilisable dans le différend, tout en ouvrant un espace nouveau de sélection, d’interprétation et de pouvoir différé. +Ce méta-régime montre ainsi qu'une société peut produire de la +co-viabilité non plus seulement par le rite, la fonction ou l'agencement +matériel, mais par une grammaire documentaire de l'obligation, de la +preuve et de la reconnaissance. L'écriture y apparaît comme un opérateur +archicratique central : elle stabilise, qualifie, rend plus aisément +mobilisable dans le différend, tout en ouvrant un espace nouveau de +sélection, d'interprétation et de pouvoir différé. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. -Mais cette stabilité documentaire ouvre bientôt sur une autre transformation : celle où l’écriture cesse d’être seulement opérateur de normativité pour devenir support de transcendance, de canon et d’autorité textuelle supérieure. C’est à cette inflexion qu’est consacrée la sous-section suivante. +Mais cette stabilité documentaire ouvre bientôt sur une autre +transformation : celle où l'écriture cesse d'être seulement opérateur de +normativité pour devenir support de transcendance, de canon et +d'autorité textuelle supérieure. C'est à cette inflexion qu'est +consacrée la sous-section suivante. ### 2.2.5 — *Archicrations scripturo-cosmologiques* -Il existe des configurations régulatrices dans lesquelles la normativité ne procède ni d’un sujet énonciateur, ni d’un code juridico-prescriptif, ni de la révélation d’un commandement divin, mais de la reconnaissance d’un ordre cosmique préalable. Dans ce méta-régime, l’écriture n’édicte pas la règle : elle rend visible une structure du monde tenue pour stable, hiérarchisée et intelligible, à laquelle les conduites doivent s’ajuster pour demeurer viables. +Il existe des configurations régulatrices dans lesquelles la normativité +ne procède ni d'un sujet énonciateur, ni d'un code juridico-prescriptif, +ni de la révélation d'un commandement divin, mais de la reconnaissance +d'un ordre cosmique préalable. Dans ce méta-régime, l'écriture n'édicte +pas la règle : elle rend visible une structure du monde tenue pour +stable, hiérarchisée et intelligible, à laquelle les conduites doivent +s'ajuster pour demeurer viables. -L’archicration scripturo-cosmologique repose ainsi sur une forme de régulation où le texte n’impose pas, mais expose ; où la contrainte ne vient pas d’un ordre formulé, mais du désajustement lisible entre les gestes, les temps, les lieux et l’architecture du cosmos telle qu’elle est transcrite. L’arcalité s’y manifeste comme structure externe à l’humain mais immanente au monde, la cratialité comme tenue collective de l’alignement, et l’archicration comme scène d’activation située entre texte, geste, ciel et lieu. +L'archicration scripturo-cosmologique repose ainsi sur une forme de +régulation où le texte n'impose pas, mais expose ; où la contrainte ne +vient pas d'un ordre formulé, mais du désajustement lisible entre les +gestes, les temps, les lieux et l'architecture du cosmos telle qu'elle +est transcrite. L'arcalité s'y manifeste comme structure externe à +l'humain mais immanente au monde, la cratialité comme tenue collective +de l'alignement, et l'archicration comme scène d'activation située entre +texte, geste, ciel et lieu. -L’arcalité se manifeste par la reconnaissance d’une structure cosmique intelligible, fondée sur des relations ordonnées entre les sphères, les éléments, les temporalités, les orientations. L’écriture, dans cette configuration, n’est ni révélée ni prescriptive : elle est le moyen de captation, de stabilisation, voire de copie fidèle de cet ordre fondamental. Les grands textes astronomiques mésopotamiens, en particulier le *MUL.APIN* (VIIIe–VIIe s. av. n. è.), n’ont pas pour fonction de prédire ou de planifier, mais de condenser dans une forme scripturaire fixe les relations entre corps célestes, saisons, calendriers, phénomènes météorologiques, et repères agraires. Hunger et Pingree (1989) montrent que le *MUL.APIN* ne propose pas une table de calculs, mais une cosmographie intégrale, qui permet de situer les actes humains dans une trame intelligible : choix des dates rituelles, orientation des sacrifices, délimitation des champs, planification des déplacements. Ce n’est pas une norme au sens juridique : c’est une topologie du monde qui contraint par la clarté de sa configuration. La faute, ici, n’est pas une désobéissance, mais un dérèglement des correspondances. +L'arcalité se manifeste par la reconnaissance d'une structure cosmique +intelligible, fondée sur des relations ordonnées entre les sphères, les +éléments, les temporalités, les orientations. L'écriture, dans cette +configuration, n'est ni révélée ni prescriptive : elle est le moyen de +captation, de stabilisation, voire de copie fidèle de cet ordre +fondamental. Les grands textes astronomiques mésopotamiens, en +particulier le *MUL.APIN* (VIIIe–VIIe s. av. n. è.), n'ont pas pour +fonction de prédire ou de planifier, mais de condenser dans une forme +scripturaire fixe les relations entre corps célestes, saisons, +calendriers, phénomènes météorologiques, et repères agraires. Hunger et +Pingree (1989) montrent que le *MUL.APIN* ne propose pas une table de +calculs, mais une cosmographie intégrale, qui permet de situer les actes +humains dans une trame intelligible : choix des dates rituelles, +orientation des sacrifices, délimitation des champs, planification des +déplacements. Ce n'est pas une norme au sens juridique : c'est une +topologie du monde qui contraint par la clarté de sa configuration. La +faute, ici, n'est pas une désobéissance, mais un dérèglement des +correspondances. -Cette conception s’observe aussi dans la tradition funéraire égyptienne. Le *Livre des morts*, notamment dans ses versions du Nouvel Empire (XVIe–XIe s. av. n. è.), ne se présente pas comme un recueil de lois, mais comme une cartographie posthume du monde invisible, dans laquelle le défunt doit se mouvoir en respectant les orientations, les formules, les seuils. Le chapitre 125, consacré à la pesée du cœur, n’interroge pas l’individu selon un critère moral subjectif, mais selon sa tenue conforme à la *Maât*, principe de juste mesure cosmique. Erik Hornung (1999) note que les formules prononcées par le défunt ne servent pas à convaincre un juge, mais à prouver par la parole rituelle que la vie du défunt fut alignée avec l’agencement du monde. Le texte n’est pas une sentence : il est le modèle de stabilité auquel on se réfère pour mesurer l’âme. +Cette conception s'observe aussi dans la tradition funéraire égyptienne. +Le *Livre des morts*, notamment dans ses versions du Nouvel Empire +(XVIe–XIe s. av. n. è.), ne se présente pas comme un recueil de lois, +mais comme une cartographie posthume du monde invisible, dans laquelle +le défunt doit se mouvoir en respectant les orientations, les formules, +les seuils. Le chapitre 125, consacré à la pesée du cœur, n'interroge +pas l'individu selon un critère moral subjectif, mais selon sa tenue +conforme à la *Maât*, principe de juste mesure cosmique. Erik Hornung +(1999) note que les formules prononcées par le défunt ne servent pas à +convaincre un juge, mais à prouver par la parole rituelle que la vie du +défunt fut alignée avec l'agencement du monde. Le texte n'est pas une +sentence : il est le modèle de stabilité auquel on se réfère pour +mesurer l'âme. -La cratialité, dans ce régime, ne s’exerce ni par coercition ni par commandement. Elle réside dans la force régulatrice des structures cycliques et dans la nécessité de se tenir à ce qui a été inscrit comme régularité cosmique. Le texte contraint non parce qu’il menace, mais parce qu’il rend le désajustement immédiatement lisible. La répétition correcte des pratiques — au bon moment, dans le bon ordre, selon le bon schéma — devient ainsi la condition silencieuse de la validité collective. Dans le domaine agraire, le désalignement d’un rite avec un cycle saisonnier, identifié grâce à un corpus comme le MUL.APIN, pouvait produire une dissonance perçue comme dangereuse, tant dans ses effets symboliques que matériels : récolte déréglée, instabilité météorologique, troubles sociaux. La régulation n’est donc pas punitive, mais systémique : chaque geste mal calé est un facteur de désordre général. L’efficacité du texte est proportionnelle à sa capacité à soutenir la continuité rythmique des cycles. Il n’y a pas d’ordre à exécuter, mais une structure à entretenir. L’écriture est là pour maintenir la co-viabilité. +La cratialité, dans ce régime, ne s'exerce ni par coercition ni par +commandement. Elle réside dans la force régulatrice des structures +cycliques et dans la nécessité de se tenir à ce qui a été inscrit comme +régularité cosmique. Le texte contraint non parce qu'il menace, mais +parce qu'il rend le désajustement immédiatement lisible. La répétition +correcte des pratiques — au bon moment, dans le bon ordre, selon le +bon schéma — devient ainsi la condition silencieuse de la validité +collective. Dans le domaine agraire, le désalignement d'un rite avec un +cycle saisonnier, identifié grâce à un corpus comme le MUL.APIN, pouvait +produire une dissonance perçue comme dangereuse, tant dans ses effets +symboliques que matériels : récolte déréglée, instabilité +météorologique, troubles sociaux. La régulation n'est donc pas punitive, +mais systémique : chaque geste mal calé est un facteur de désordre +général. L'efficacité du texte est proportionnelle à sa capacité à +soutenir la continuité rythmique des cycles. Il n'y a pas d'ordre à +exécuter, mais une structure à entretenir. L'écriture est là pour +maintenir la co-viabilité. -L’*archicration* se donne enfin dans les scènes d’activation rituelle du texte, où ce dernier n’est ni débattu, ni interprété, ni traduit, mais relancé dans sa capacité à tenir le monde ensemble. À Babylone, la célèbre *Carte du Monde* (BM 92687), gravée sur tablette en akkadien au VIIe siècle av. n. è., à dessin planiforme, représente un espace circulaire centré sur Babylone et bordé d’îles périphériques stylisées. Elle ne sert pas à orienter un voyage, mais à stabiliser une disposition spatiale sacrée. Wayne Horowitz (1998) souligne qu’elle matérialise une cosmologie géographique dans laquelle chaque élément est situé selon sa fonction symbolique dans l’ordre d’ensemble. De même, dans la tradition védique ancienne, les hymnes cosmogoniques tels que le *Nāsadīya Sūkta* (*Ṛgveda* 10.129) ne délivrent pas une doctrine sur l’origine du monde, mais rejouent la tension entre indétermination originelle et structuration progressive du réel, par la puissance rituelle de l’énoncé. Jamison et Brereton (2014) analysent que la force de ce passage ne réside pas tant dans ce qu’il affirme, que dans sa capacité à relancer l’ajustement du chant à la structure cosmique, dans le cadre sacrificiel. +L'*archicration* se donne enfin dans les scènes d'activation rituelle du +texte, où ce dernier n'est ni débattu, ni interprété, ni traduit, mais +relancé dans sa capacité à tenir le monde ensemble. À Babylone, la +célèbre *Carte du Monde* (BM 92687), gravée sur tablette en akkadien au +VIIe siècle av. n. è., à dessin planiforme, représente un espace +circulaire centré sur Babylone et bordé d'îles périphériques stylisées. +Elle ne sert pas à orienter un voyage, mais à stabiliser une disposition +spatiale sacrée. Wayne Horowitz (1998) souligne qu'elle matérialise une +cosmologie géographique dans laquelle chaque élément est situé selon sa +fonction symbolique dans l'ordre d'ensemble. De même, dans la tradition +védique ancienne, les hymnes cosmogoniques tels que le *Nāsadīya Sūkta* +(*Ṛgveda* 10.129) ne délivrent pas une doctrine sur l'origine du monde, +mais rejouent la tension entre indétermination originelle et +structuration progressive du réel, par la puissance rituelle de +l'énoncé. Jamison et Brereton (2014) analysent que la force de ce +passage ne réside pas tant dans ce qu'il affirme, que dans sa capacité à +relancer l'ajustement du chant à la structure cosmique, dans le cadre +sacrificiel. -Ces régulations, bien qu’indépendantes de toute autorité instituée, impliquent souvent des agents rituels spécialisés — brahmanes védiques, prêtres-lecteurs égyptiens, scribes-astronomes mésopotamiens. Leur fonction n’est ni de commander ni d’interpréter librement, mais de garantir la justesse de l’activation : gardiens de cadence plus que prescripteurs. +Ces régulations, bien qu'indépendantes de toute autorité instituée, +impliquent souvent des agents rituels spécialisés — brahmanes +védiques, prêtres-lecteurs égyptiens, scribes-astronomes mésopotamiens. +Leur fonction n'est ni de commander ni d'interpréter librement, mais de +garantir la justesse de l'activation : gardiens de cadence plus que +prescripteurs. -La scène archicratique n’est donc pas un acte de promulgation. Elle se caractérise par la relecture cadencée, le repositionnement du corps et la synchronisation du rite avec l’agencement du monde tel qu’il est rendu visible par les écrits. Le texte peut être parfois inintelligible : ce n’est pas pour autant un problème, car sa puissance régulatrice tient dans son positionnement, son copiage fidèle, son activation correcte dans un lieu. Son autorité ne repose ni sur un auteur, ni sur une institution, ni sur une volonté divine, mais sur sa capacité à exposer la forme du réel — et à la rendre disponible à l’ajustement. C’est parce que l’écriture donne à voir l’ordre du monde que la conduite devient lisible comme ajustée ou non. +La scène archicratique n'est donc pas un acte de promulgation. Elle se +caractérise par la relecture cadencée, le repositionnement du corps et +la synchronisation du rite avec l'agencement du monde tel qu'il est +rendu visible par les écrits. Le texte peut être parfois inintelligible +: ce n'est pas pour autant un problème, car sa puissance régulatrice +tient dans son positionnement, son copiage fidèle, son activation +correcte dans un lieu. Son autorité ne repose ni sur un auteur, ni sur +une institution, ni sur une volonté divine, mais sur sa capacité à +exposer la forme du réel — et à la rendre disponible à l'ajustement. +C'est parce que l'écriture donne à voir l'ordre du monde que la conduite +devient lisible comme ajustée ou non. -Dans certains cas, la densité symbolique des textes cosmographiques autorise une herméneutique d’ajustement : non une exégèse doctrinale, mais une marge de variation portant sur la forme correcte de l’activation. Ainsi, les Brāhmaṇa védiques multiplient les gloses sur la justesse de la récitation ou sur les correspondances entre phonème et configuration cosmique, sans jamais sortir du cadre performatif. De même, certaines versions tardives des Textes des pyramides introduisent des variantes d’agencement sans altérer l’architecture d’ensemble. +Dans certains cas, la densité symbolique des textes cosmographiques +autorise une herméneutique d'ajustement : non une exégèse doctrinale, +mais une marge de variation portant sur la forme correcte de +l'activation. Ainsi, les Brāhmaṇa védiques multiplient les gloses sur la +justesse de la récitation ou sur les correspondances entre phonème et +configuration cosmique, sans jamais sortir du cadre performatif. De +même, certaines versions tardives des Textes des pyramides introduisent +des variantes d'agencement sans altérer l'architecture d'ensemble. -La puissance régulatrice de l’écriture cosmographique ne réside ni dans sa lisibilité immédiate ni dans une propriété magique du support, mais dans sa capacité à être activée correctement dans des lieux, des moments et des gestes qui rejouent la structure qu’elle expose. La scène archicratique ne se confond ni avec l’enseignement ni avec l’exégèse : elle relève d’un enchaînement formalisé de postures, de récitations, de placements et de rythmes faisant du texte un pont opératoire entre l’agencement du réel et la conduite réglée. +La puissance régulatrice de l'écriture cosmographique ne réside ni dans +sa lisibilité immédiate ni dans une propriété magique du support, mais +dans sa capacité à être activée correctement dans des lieux, des moments +et des gestes qui rejouent la structure qu'elle expose. La scène +archicratique ne se confond ni avec l'enseignement ni avec l'exégèse : +elle relève d'un enchaînement formalisé de postures, de récitations, de +placements et de rythmes faisant du texte un pont opératoire entre +l'agencement du réel et la conduite réglée. -Le lieu d’activation est toujours orienté, ritualisé, hiérarchisé. Dans l’Égypte ancienne, les inscriptions des tombeaux et des temples reproduisent spatialement l’ordre cosmique ; en Mésopotamie, certaines tablettes astronomiques sont situées dans des espaces d’observation et de relance rituelle ; dans le monde védique, la valeur d’un hymne dépend de son triple alignement spatial, temporel et textuel. Dans tous ces cas, la contrainte ne vient pas d’une interprétation doctrinale, mais de la justesse d’une mise en phase entre texte, lieu, corps et cycle. +Le lieu d'activation est toujours orienté, ritualisé, hiérarchisé. Dans +l'Égypte ancienne, les inscriptions des tombeaux et des temples +reproduisent spatialement l'ordre cosmique ; en Mésopotamie, certaines +tablettes astronomiques sont situées dans des espaces d'observation et +de relance rituelle ; dans le monde védique, la valeur d'un hymne dépend +de son triple alignement spatial, temporel et textuel. Dans tous ces +cas, la contrainte ne vient pas d'une interprétation doctrinale, mais de +la justesse d'une mise en phase entre texte, lieu, corps et cycle. -L’archicration scripturo-cosmologique se reconnaît ainsi à sa capacité à faire advenir une cohérence sans décret ni commandement. Elle n’impose pas : elle relance un agencement réputé vrai. Son efficacité ne réside pas dans la compréhension du texte, mais dans la réactivation correcte de la structure qu’il rend visible. +L'archicration scripturo-cosmologique se reconnaît ainsi à sa capacité à +faire advenir une cohérence sans décret ni commandement. Elle n'impose +pas : elle relance un agencement réputé vrai. Son efficacité ne réside +pas dans la compréhension du texte, mais dans la réactivation correcte +de la structure qu'il rend visible. -Si ce régime n’édicte pas d’ordres au sens prescriptif, il n’est pas pour autant sans puissance de rappel. L’obligation s’y infère du décalage : non comme faute devant une norme, mais comme désajustement lisible entre texte, geste, temps, lieu et ordre du monde. Ce n’est pas un tribunal qui statue, mais une discordance qui expose l’écart à la structure tenue pour vraie. +Si ce régime n'édicte pas d'ordres au sens prescriptif, il n'est pas +pour autant sans puissance de rappel. L'obligation s'y infère du +décalage : non comme faute devant une norme, mais comme désajustement +lisible entre texte, geste, temps, lieu et ordre du monde. Ce n'est pas +un tribunal qui statue, mais une discordance qui expose l'écart à la +structure tenue pour vraie. -Dans le monde mésopotamien, les irrégularités célestes ou calendaires ne sont pas d’abord perçues comme des messages à interpréter moralement, mais comme des signes de désalignement entre les pratiques humaines et l’architecture cosmique consignée dans les corpus astronomiques. Dans le monde védique, une récitation défectueuse ou une séquence rituelle mal ordonnée interrompt l’efficacité du rite ; dans l’Égypte ancienne, l’omission d’une formule ou l’inversion d’un parcours funéraire désactive la trajectoire cosmique du défunt. Dans tous ces cas, la régulation ne punit pas : elle signale une perte de cohérence et appelle une resynchronisation. +Dans le monde mésopotamien, les irrégularités célestes ou calendaires ne +sont pas d'abord perçues comme des messages à interpréter moralement, +mais comme des signes de désalignement entre les pratiques humaines et +l'architecture cosmique consignée dans les corpus astronomiques. Dans le +monde védique, une récitation défectueuse ou une séquence rituelle mal +ordonnée interrompt l'efficacité du rite ; dans l'Égypte ancienne, +l'omission d'une formule ou l'inversion d'un parcours funéraire +désactive la trajectoire cosmique du défunt. Dans tous ces cas, la +régulation ne punit pas : elle signale une perte de cohérence et appelle +une resynchronisation. -Cette régulation n’est pourtant pas figée. Les textes cosmographiques doivent rester synchrones avec un monde mouvant, tout en maintenant une structure lisible et stable. Leur plasticité n’est jamais libre : elle consiste dans une capacité de reconfiguration fidèle, par copie, relance, interpolation ou réorientation, dès lors que la cohérence de l’ensemble demeure intacte. En Égypte comme en Mésopotamie ou dans le monde védique, l’écriture cosmographique ne vaut pas comme origine intangible, mais comme moyen de maintien du monde par reprise réglée de ses correspondances. +Cette régulation n'est pourtant pas figée. Les textes cosmographiques +doivent rester synchrones avec un monde mouvant, tout en maintenant une +structure lisible et stable. Leur plasticité n'est jamais libre : elle +consiste dans une capacité de reconfiguration fidèle, par copie, +relance, interpolation ou réorientation, dès lors que la cohérence de +l'ensemble demeure intacte. En Égypte comme en Mésopotamie ou dans le +monde védique, l'écriture cosmographique ne vaut pas comme origine +intangible, mais comme moyen de maintien du monde par reprise réglée de +ses correspondances. -Ce régime ne disparaît pas lorsque d’autres formes régulatrices émergent. Il peut être déplacé, relocalisé, mis en régime mineur ou intégré à d’autres architectures, sans perdre pour autant sa logique propre. Des cosmographies mésopotamiennes continuent d’opérer à côté de textes prescriptifs ; des inscriptions égyptiennes deviennent matrices de mémoire rituelle plus que moteurs de régulation collective ; des textualités védiques sont enveloppées par des corpus plus explicitement normatifs sans cesser d’assurer des fonctions d’alignement. L’archicration scripturo-cosmologique n’est donc pas remplacée : elle voit varier ses scènes d’activation et son efficacité relative. +Ce régime ne disparaît pas lorsque d'autres formes régulatrices +émergent. Il peut être déplacé, relocalisé, mis en régime mineur ou +intégré à d'autres architectures, sans perdre pour autant sa logique +propre. Des cosmographies mésopotamiennes continuent d'opérer à côté de +textes prescriptifs ; des inscriptions égyptiennes deviennent matrices +de mémoire rituelle plus que moteurs de régulation collective ; des +textualités védiques sont enveloppées par des corpus plus explicitement +normatifs sans cesser d'assurer des fonctions d'alignement. +L'archicration scripturo-cosmologique n'est donc pas remplacée : elle +voit varier ses scènes d'activation et son efficacité relative. -Sa spécificité apparaît avec netteté par comparaison. Contrairement au proto-symbolique, elle suppose une mémoire scripturaire structurée ; contrairement au techno-logistique, elle ne coordonne pas des flux en vue d’une fonction, mais reconduit un ordre tenu pour cosmique ; contrairement au scripturo-normatif, elle ne prescrit pas des comportements au nom d’une norme opposable, mais rend visibles des correspondances auxquelles il faut se tenir. Elle peut coexister avec ces autres régimes sans se confondre avec aucun d’eux. +Sa spécificité apparaît avec netteté par comparaison. Contrairement au +proto-symbolique, elle suppose une mémoire scripturaire structurée ; +contrairement au techno-logistique, elle ne coordonne pas des flux en +vue d'une fonction, mais reconduit un ordre tenu pour cosmique ; +contrairement au scripturo-normatif, elle ne prescrit pas des +comportements au nom d'une norme opposable, mais rend visibles des +correspondances auxquelles il faut se tenir. Elle peut coexister avec +ces autres régimes sans se confondre avec aucun d'eux. -La différence est décisive avec l’archicration théologique à venir. Dans le régime théologique, ce qui oblige procède d’une parole transcendante, révélée et tenue pour supérieure au monde ; ici, au contraire, le texte n’est pas fondement par énonciation, mais surface de figuration d’un ordre déjà là. Là où le théologique oblige par foi en la source, le scripturo-cosmologique oblige par ajustement à la structure. +La différence est décisive avec l'archicration théologique à venir. Dans +le régime théologique, ce qui oblige procède d'une parole transcendante, +révélée et tenue pour supérieure au monde ; ici, au contraire, le texte +n'est pas fondement par énonciation, mais surface de figuration d'un +ordre déjà là. Là où le théologique oblige par foi en la source, le +scripturo-cosmologique oblige par ajustement à la structure. -L’archicration scripturo-cosmologique désigne ainsi une régulation silencieuse, sans sujet fondateur, sans centre ordonnateur et sans prescription explicite. Le texte n’y formule pas ce qu’il faut faire ; il rend visible ce à quoi il faut se tenir pour que le monde, les gestes et les cycles demeurent accordés. L’arcalité y réside dans la structure du cosmos réputée lisible, la cratialité dans la tenue collective de l’alignement, l’archicration dans la scène d’activation où texte, lieu, temps et corps entrent en phase. +L'archicration scripturo-cosmologique désigne ainsi une régulation +silencieuse, sans sujet fondateur, sans centre ordonnateur et sans +prescription explicite. Le texte n'y formule pas ce qu'il faut faire ; +il rend visible ce à quoi il faut se tenir pour que le monde, les gestes +et les cycles demeurent accordés. L'arcalité y réside dans la structure +du cosmos réputée lisible, la cratialité dans la tenue collective de +l'alignement, l'archicration dans la scène d'activation où texte, lieu, +temps et corps entrent en phase. -Ce méta-régime montre qu’une société peut produire de la co-viabilité non par commandement, sanction ou simple fonctionnalité, mais par mise en correspondance réglée avec un ordre tenu pour plus vaste qu’elle. Il oblige sans décret, corrige sans tribunal, maintient sans centre. C’est en cela qu’il constitue une forme archicratique irréductible. +Ce méta-régime montre qu'une société peut produire de la co-viabilité +non par commandement, sanction ou simple fonctionnalité, mais par mise +en correspondance réglée avec un ordre tenu pour plus vaste qu'elle. Il +oblige sans décret, corrige sans tribunal, maintient sans centre. C'est +en cela qu'il constitue une forme archicratique irréductible. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est reporté en annexe. -Cette séparation entre la structure cosmique et la source d’énonciation ouvre toutefois à un autre régime : celui où le texte ne reflète plus l’ordre du monde, mais procède d’une parole transcendante qui en devient le fondement. C’est cette inflexion qu’examine la sous-section suivante. +Cette séparation entre la structure cosmique et la source d'énonciation +ouvre toutefois à un autre régime : celui où le texte ne reflète plus +l'ordre du monde, mais procède d'une parole transcendante qui en devient +le fondement. C'est cette inflexion qu'examine la sous-section suivante. ### 2.2.6 — *Archicrations théologiques* -Dans le régime que nous appelons ici archicration théologique, l’obligation ne procède ni d’un ordre cosmique lisible, ni d’une norme juridico-prescriptive, ni d’une simple régulation rituelle, mais d’une parole révélée tenue pour émaner d’une source divine transcendante, irréductible à toute structure du monde. Le texte n’y oblige pas parce qu’il reflète un ordre naturel ou social : il oblige parce qu’il est reçu comme parole de Dieu. +Dans le régime que nous appelons ici archicration théologique, +l'obligation ne procède ni d'un ordre cosmique lisible, ni d'une norme +juridico-prescriptive, ni d'une simple régulation rituelle, mais d'une +parole révélée tenue pour émaner d'une source divine transcendante, +irréductible à toute structure du monde. Le texte n'y oblige pas parce +qu'il reflète un ordre naturel ou social : il oblige parce qu'il est +reçu comme parole de Dieu. -L’arcalité théologique réside précisément dans cette rupture. Ici, le fondement n’est pas la reconnaissance d’une structure préalable, mais l’irruption d’un dire qui institue la normativité par son origine même. Ce n’est pas le monde qui fournit la règle ; c’est la parole révélée qui adresse, fonde et ordonne. La scène inaugurale n’est donc pas celle d’un ordre à lire, mais d’une voix à recevoir : Sinaï, révélation coranique, Verbe incarné. +L'arcalité théologique réside précisément dans cette rupture. Ici, le +fondement n'est pas la reconnaissance d'une structure préalable, mais +l'irruption d'un dire qui institue la normativité par son origine même. +Ce n'est pas le monde qui fournit la règle ; c'est la parole révélée qui +adresse, fonde et ordonne. La scène inaugurale n'est donc pas celle d'un +ordre à lire, mais d'une voix à recevoir : Sinaï, révélation coranique, +Verbe incarné. -Dans cette configuration, le texte n’est ni miroir du réel ni simple archive doctrinale. Il est la trace d’une adresse fondatrice, d’un moment où l’énoncé est tenu pour provenir d’un dehors absolu. Comme l’ont montré Michael Fishbane, Jon D. Levenson, Seyyed Hossein Nasr ou Jan Assmann, la validité ne découle pas ici de l’intelligibilité interne du texte, mais de la reconnaissance de sa source supra-humaine. La parole révélée oblige non parce qu’elle convainc, mais parce qu’elle est tenue pour divine. +Dans cette configuration, le texte n'est ni miroir du réel ni simple +archive doctrinale. Il est la trace d'une adresse fondatrice, d'un +moment où l'énoncé est tenu pour provenir d'un dehors absolu. Comme +l'ont montré Michael Fishbane, Jon D. Levenson, Seyyed Hossein Nasr ou +Jan Assmann, la validité ne découle pas ici de l'intelligibilité interne +du texte, mais de la reconnaissance de sa source supra-humaine. La +parole révélée oblige non parce qu'elle convainc, mais parce qu'elle est +tenue pour divine. -L’archicration théologique se déploie ainsi dans un régime où la norme n’est pas déduite, mais reçue ; où l’écriture ne copie pas le monde, mais conserve l’empreinte d’une révélation ; où l’autorité ne procède pas de la structure du réel, mais de la fidélité à une parole tenue pour inaltérable. C’est cette configuration que manifestent les grandes traditions du texte révélé. +L'archicration théologique se déploie ainsi dans un régime où la norme +n'est pas déduite, mais reçue ; où l'écriture ne copie pas le monde, +mais conserve l'empreinte d'une révélation ; où l'autorité ne procède +pas de la structure du réel, mais de la fidélité à une parole tenue pour +inaltérable. C'est cette configuration que manifestent les grandes +traditions du texte révélé. -Si la parole révélée constitue l’arcalité propre du régime théologique, la cratialité ne se déploie ni dans la coercition directe, ni dans l’appareil juridique, ni dans l’efficacité logistique d’un système. Elle réside dans la puissance d’obligation attachée à un énoncé tenu pour divin, c’est-à-dire dans la capacité d’une parole reçue comme irrévocable à structurer les conduites, les appartenances et les frontières du dicible. Ce qui oblige ici n’est pas d’abord un ordre humain, mais la reconnaissance de l’origine absolue du dire. +Si la parole révélée constitue l'arcalité propre du régime théologique, +la cratialité ne se déploie ni dans la coercition directe, ni dans +l'appareil juridique, ni dans l'efficacité logistique d'un système. Elle +réside dans la puissance d'obligation attachée à un énoncé tenu pour +divin, c'est-à-dire dans la capacité d'une parole reçue comme +irrévocable à structurer les conduites, les appartenances et les +frontières du dicible. Ce qui oblige ici n'est pas d'abord un ordre +humain, mais la reconnaissance de l'origine absolue du dire. -Cette parole, cependant, ne descend jamais nue dans l’histoire. Elle s’actualise à travers des figures de médiation — prophètes, messies, envoyés, apôtres — qui ne sont ni auteurs ni législateurs au sens plein, mais dépositaires d’une parole qu’ils ne possèdent pas. Leur singularité tient à ceci : ils inaugurent la scène dans laquelle la révélation devient recevable, transmissible et stabilisable. L’autorité prophétique ne crée pas la norme ; elle configure la possibilité de sa réception. +Cette parole, cependant, ne descend jamais nue dans l'histoire. Elle +s'actualise à travers des figures de médiation — prophètes, messies, +envoyés, apôtres — qui ne sont ni auteurs ni législateurs au sens +plein, mais dépositaires d'une parole qu'ils ne possèdent pas. Leur +singularité tient à ceci : ils inaugurent la scène dans laquelle la +révélation devient recevable, transmissible et stabilisable. L'autorité +prophétique ne crée pas la norme ; elle configure la possibilité de sa +réception. -La tradition juive, l’islam et le christianisme donnent à voir trois versions majeures de cette configuration. Moïse transmet la Torah comme parole donnée, non composée ; Muḥammad reçoit et relaie le Qurʾān comme descente révélée ; le christianisme pense le Christ comme Verbe incarné, et les Évangiles comme témoignage normatif de cette parole. Dans tous ces cas, l’obligation ne procède ni d’une démonstration ni d’une expérience cosmique : elle vient de ce qu’une parole tenue pour divine a été adressée, reçue et transmise. +La tradition juive, l'islam et le christianisme donnent à voir trois +versions majeures de cette configuration. Moïse transmet la Torah comme +parole donnée, non composée ; Muḥammad reçoit et relaie le Qurʾān comme +descente révélée ; le christianisme pense le Christ comme Verbe incarné, +et les Évangiles comme témoignage normatif de cette parole. Dans tous +ces cas, l'obligation ne procède ni d'une démonstration ni d'une +expérience cosmique : elle vient de ce qu'une parole tenue pour divine a +été adressée, reçue et transmise. -La cratialité théologique s’exerce alors dans les dispositifs de fidélité à cette source : chaînes de transmission, écoles exégétiques, autorités doctrinales, gardiens du canon. Les figures d’autorité n’ont de poids qu’en tant qu’elles se réclament d’un énoncé antérieur qu’elles n’égalisent jamais. Leur pouvoir ne réside pas dans l’invention, mais dans la conservation réglée, l’actualisation fidèle et la délimitation des interprétations recevables. +La cratialité théologique s'exerce alors dans les dispositifs de +fidélité à cette source : chaînes de transmission, écoles exégétiques, +autorités doctrinales, gardiens du canon. Les figures d'autorité n'ont +de poids qu'en tant qu'elles se réclament d'un énoncé antérieur qu'elles +n'égalisent jamais. Leur pouvoir ne réside pas dans l'invention, mais +dans la conservation réglée, l'actualisation fidèle et la délimitation +des interprétations recevables. -C’est pourquoi le jugement, dans ce régime, porte d’abord sur la conformité énonciative. Hérésie, schisme, takfīr, apostasie ou condamnation doctrinale ne désignent pas seulement une déviance morale ou sociale : ils marquent un désalignement à l’égard de la parole-source. L’archicration théologique se manifeste ici comme chaîne de garde herméneutique, tendue entre la révélation première et ses lectures autorisées, où la fidélité vaut principe régulateur majeur. +C'est pourquoi le jugement, dans ce régime, porte d'abord sur la +conformité énonciative. Hérésie, schisme, takfīr, apostasie ou +condamnation doctrinale ne désignent pas seulement une déviance morale +ou sociale : ils marquent un désalignement à l'égard de la +parole-source. L'archicration théologique se manifeste ici comme chaîne +de garde herméneutique, tendue entre la révélation première et ses +lectures autorisées, où la fidélité vaut principe régulateur majeur. -L’archicration théologique se manifeste au sens strict dans les scènes d’activation liturgique et rituelle où la parole révélée devient opérante par sa reprise fidèle. L’enjeu n’est pas seulement de transmettre un contenu, mais de faire surgir, dans l’instant de la récitation, de la proclamation ou de l’écoute, un effet d’obligation attaché à la présence rejouée du texte révélé. Le texte n’oblige pas ici comme un simple code ; il oblige dans et par les formes réglées de sa mise en œuvre. +L'archicration théologique se manifeste au sens strict dans les scènes +d'activation liturgique et rituelle où la parole révélée devient +opérante par sa reprise fidèle. L'enjeu n'est pas seulement de +transmettre un contenu, mais de faire surgir, dans l'instant de la +récitation, de la proclamation ou de l'écoute, un effet d'obligation +attaché à la présence rejouée du texte révélé. Le texte n'oblige pas ici +comme un simple code ; il oblige dans et par les formes réglées de sa +mise en œuvre. -Cette scène ne peut être dissociée d’une posture de réception. Ce n’est pas un texte lu abstraitement qui régule, mais un texte entendu, récité, chanté ou proclamé dans un cadre spatial, temporel et corporel garantissant sa validité. La parole révélée demande activation, disposition intérieure, répétition, mémoire et reconnaissance communautaire de sa source. Ce qui est en jeu n’est donc pas la libre adhésion, mais la réception orientée d’un énoncé tenu pour absolu. +Cette scène ne peut être dissociée d'une posture de réception. Ce n'est +pas un texte lu abstraitement qui régule, mais un texte entendu, récité, +chanté ou proclamé dans un cadre spatial, temporel et corporel +garantissant sa validité. La parole révélée demande activation, +disposition intérieure, répétition, mémoire et reconnaissance +communautaire de sa source. Ce qui est en jeu n'est donc pas la libre +adhésion, mais la réception orientée d'un énoncé tenu pour absolu. -La tradition juive, l’islam et le christianisme offrent ici trois formes exemplaires. Le Shemaʿ et la qeriʾa de la Torah, la récitation coranique dans la ṣalāt, la proclamation évangélique dans la liturgie chrétienne ne valent pas d’abord comme explication ou commentaire, mais comme relance canonique de la parole-source. Leur efficacité n’est pas annulée par l’inintelligibilité partielle du texte : elle dépend de la fidélité à la forme rituelle, à la diction, au lieu, au moment et aux règles de réception. La parole ne convainc pas seulement ; elle configure. +La tradition juive, l'islam et le christianisme offrent ici trois formes +exemplaires. Le Shemaʿ et la qeriʾa de la Torah, la récitation coranique +dans la ṣalāt, la proclamation évangélique dans la liturgie chrétienne +ne valent pas d'abord comme explication ou commentaire, mais comme +relance canonique de la parole-source. Leur efficacité n'est pas annulée +par l'inintelligibilité partielle du texte : elle dépend de la fidélité +à la forme rituelle, à la diction, au lieu, au moment et aux règles de +réception. La parole ne convainc pas seulement ; elle configure. -Cette activation se prolonge hors du sanctuaire dans des formes quotidiennes de mémorisation, de répétition et d’incorporation. Prières réglées, étude, récitations privées, versets portés sur le corps, bénédictions, discipline des heures : tout cela fait du fidèle non un simple destinataire, mais l’interface incarnée d’une parole qui continue d’ordonner la conduite. L’archicration théologique ne produit donc pas seulement des assemblées liturgiques ; elle forme des corps ajustés à la répétition du Verbe. +Cette activation se prolonge hors du sanctuaire dans des formes +quotidiennes de mémorisation, de répétition et d'incorporation. Prières +réglées, étude, récitations privées, versets portés sur le corps, +bénédictions, discipline des heures : tout cela fait du fidèle non un +simple destinataire, mais l'interface incarnée d'une parole qui continue +d'ordonner la conduite. L'archicration théologique ne produit donc pas +seulement des assemblées liturgiques ; elle forme des corps ajustés à la +répétition du Verbe. -Il serait dès lors insuffisant de concevoir le texte révélé comme un code prescriptif transmis une fois pour toutes. Dans ce régime, l’obligation naît de la coexistence entre une parole tenue pour divine et les dispositifs communautaires qui la rejouent, la rendent audible et la maintiennent vivante. C’est cette coprésence du texte, du rite, du corps et de la réception qui constitue la scène archicratique proprement théologique. +Il serait dès lors insuffisant de concevoir le texte révélé comme un +code prescriptif transmis une fois pour toutes. Dans ce régime, +l'obligation naît de la coexistence entre une parole tenue pour divine +et les dispositifs communautaires qui la rejouent, la rendent audible et +la maintiennent vivante. C'est cette coprésence du texte, du rite, du +corps et de la réception qui constitue la scène archicratique proprement +théologique. -L’un des traits distinctifs du régime théologique réside dans la structuration hiérarchique des corpus scripturaires. La parole révélée y demeure la source inaltérable de l’obligation, mais elle n’opère dans l’histoire qu’à travers une architecture de textes, de commentaires, de gloses et de codifications dont l’autorité varie selon leur proximité à la révélation. Cette hiérarchie n’est pas secondaire : elle est la condition même de la stabilité normative, puisqu’elle permet d’étendre la parole-source sans jamais autoriser qu’elle soit mise à égalité avec ses développements. +L'un des traits distinctifs du régime théologique réside dans la +structuration hiérarchique des corpus scripturaires. La parole révélée y +demeure la source inaltérable de l'obligation, mais elle n'opère dans +l'histoire qu'à travers une architecture de textes, de commentaires, de +gloses et de codifications dont l'autorité varie selon leur proximité à +la révélation. Cette hiérarchie n'est pas secondaire : elle est la +condition même de la stabilité normative, puisqu'elle permet d'étendre +la parole-source sans jamais autoriser qu'elle soit mise à égalité avec +ses développements. -Dans le judaïsme rabbinique, cette topologie s’organise autour de la distinction entre Torah écrite, Mishnah, Gemara et traditions exégétiques. La révélation reste le sommet inaltérable, tandis que les textes de commentaire et de discussion ne valent qu’en tant que prolongements recevables. Comme l’a montré James Kugel, plus un texte est proche de la révélation, plus il se ferme à la réforme et à la contestation directe ; plus il s’en éloigne, plus la discussion devient possible, sans jamais remonter jusqu’à la source elle-même. +Dans le judaïsme rabbinique, cette topologie s'organise autour de la +distinction entre Torah écrite, Mishnah, Gemara et traditions +exégétiques. La révélation reste le sommet inaltérable, tandis que les +textes de commentaire et de discussion ne valent qu'en tant que +prolongements recevables. Comme l'a montré James Kugel, plus un texte +est proche de la révélation, plus il se ferme à la réforme et à la +contestation directe ; plus il s'en éloigne, plus la discussion devient +possible, sans jamais remonter jusqu'à la source elle-même. -Dans l’islam, cette stratification prend une forme particulièrement rigoureuse. Le Qurʾān demeure le texte révélé sans équivalent, tandis que les ḥadīth, les tafsīr et les constructions juridiques n’ont d’autorité qu’en tant qu’ils s’y rapportent selon des règles strictes de transmission et de fidélité. Comme l’ont montré Mohammed Arkoun ou Wael Hallaq, l’interprétation n’y est jamais libre : elle vaut seulement si elle peut se justifier par rapport à la source et à la méthodologie reconnue de son actualisation. +Dans l'islam, cette stratification prend une forme particulièrement +rigoureuse. Le Qurʾān demeure le texte révélé sans équivalent, tandis +que les ḥadīth, les tafsīr et les constructions juridiques n'ont +d'autorité qu'en tant qu'ils s'y rapportent selon des règles strictes de +transmission et de fidélité. Comme l'ont montré Mohammed Arkoun ou Wael +Hallaq, l'interprétation n'y est jamais libre : elle vaut seulement si +elle peut se justifier par rapport à la source et à la méthodologie +reconnue de son actualisation. -Le christianisme, lui aussi, articule un canon à paliers : Écritures, Évangiles, épîtres, Pères, conciles, magistère. La lecture n’y est pas abandonnée à l’initiative individuelle, mais encadrée par une tradition interprétante qui garantit l’unité doctrinale du dépôt révélé. Ce que l’on peut penser, dire ou commenter dépend toujours du lieu textuel et institutionnel à partir duquel on parle. +Le christianisme, lui aussi, articule un canon à paliers : Écritures, +Évangiles, épîtres, Pères, conciles, magistère. La lecture n'y est pas +abandonnée à l'initiative individuelle, mais encadrée par une tradition +interprétante qui garantit l'unité doctrinale du dépôt révélé. Ce que +l'on peut penser, dire ou commenter dépend toujours du lieu textuel et +institutionnel à partir duquel on parle. -Cette architecture scripturaire produit une lecture autorisée. Les écoles exégétiques, les qualifications doctrinales, les chaînes de transmission et les méthodes herméneutiques ont pour fonction non d’ouvrir indéfiniment le sens, mais de transmettre sans altérer, d’interpréter sans refonder, de commenter sans rompre le lien à la source. La pluralité des lectures est donc possible, mais elle demeure hiérarchisée, surveillée et subordonnée à l’énoncé originaire. +Cette architecture scripturaire produit une lecture autorisée. Les +écoles exégétiques, les qualifications doctrinales, les chaînes de +transmission et les méthodes herméneutiques ont pour fonction non +d'ouvrir indéfiniment le sens, mais de transmettre sans altérer, +d'interpréter sans refonder, de commenter sans rompre le lien à la +source. La pluralité des lectures est donc possible, mais elle demeure +hiérarchisée, surveillée et subordonnée à l'énoncé originaire. -Lire devient ainsi un acte archicratique à part entière. Il ne s’agit pas seulement de comprendre un texte, mais de se situer dans une pyramide de validité, de parler à la bonne distance de la source et sous les formes reconnues de la fidélité. Le savoir théologique n’est pas fondateur : il est gardien. Cette topologie du canon, de la lecture autorisée et de la fidélité graduée constitue l’un des ressorts majeurs de l’archicration théologique. +Lire devient ainsi un acte archicratique à part entière. Il ne s'agit +pas seulement de comprendre un texte, mais de se situer dans une +pyramide de validité, de parler à la bonne distance de la source et sous +les formes reconnues de la fidélité. Le savoir théologique n'est pas +fondateur : il est gardien. Cette topologie du canon, de la lecture +autorisée et de la fidélité graduée constitue l'un des ressorts majeurs +de l'archicration théologique. -Il s’ensuit une logique singulière du désaccord. Dans le régime théologique, l’opposition ne porte pas d’abord sur des normes sociales, des valeurs ou des intérêts, mais sur la fidélité à un énoncé fondateur tenu pour révélé. Le conflit ne concerne pas seulement ce qu’il faut faire, mais ce qu’il est possible de dire sans rompre l’alignement à la parole-source. +Il s'ensuit une logique singulière du désaccord. Dans le régime +théologique, l'opposition ne porte pas d'abord sur des normes sociales, +des valeurs ou des intérêts, mais sur la fidélité à un énoncé fondateur +tenu pour révélé. Le conflit ne concerne pas seulement ce qu'il faut +faire, mais ce qu'il est possible de dire sans rompre l'alignement à la +parole-source. -L’hérésie, le schisme, l’apostasie ou le takfīr ne désignent donc pas prioritairement des fautes morales ou politiques. Ils marquent un désalignement énonciatif : une parole jugée incompatible avec l’origine révélée. Ce qui est en jeu n’est pas seulement une divergence d’opinion, mais une rupture dans la chaîne de la fidélité. L’exclusion vise alors moins des personnes que des formulations devenues inassimilables au régime de vérité fondé par la révélation. +L'hérésie, le schisme, l'apostasie ou le takfīr ne désignent donc pas +prioritairement des fautes morales ou politiques. Ils marquent un +désalignement énonciatif : une parole jugée incompatible avec l'origine +révélée. Ce qui est en jeu n'est pas seulement une divergence d'opinion, +mais une rupture dans la chaîne de la fidélité. L'exclusion vise alors +moins des personnes que des formulations devenues inassimilables au +régime de vérité fondé par la révélation. -Ces mécanismes d’exclusion remplissent une fonction régulatrice centrale. Ils permettent de maintenir l’intégrité du dire en traçant les limites du dicible légitime. La conflictualité n’y est pas abolie, mais structurée : elle devient un opérateur de clarification doctrinale, par lequel la communauté ajuste en permanence les contours de ce qui peut être reçu, transmis et tenu comme fidèle. +Ces mécanismes d'exclusion remplissent une fonction régulatrice +centrale. Ils permettent de maintenir l'intégrité du dire en traçant les +limites du dicible légitime. La conflictualité n'y est pas abolie, mais +structurée : elle devient un opérateur de clarification doctrinale, par +lequel la communauté ajuste en permanence les contours de ce qui peut +être reçu, transmis et tenu comme fidèle. -Ce mode de régulation distingue nettement l’archicration théologique des autres méta-régimes. Contrairement au scripturo-normatif, elle ne repose pas sur l’application d’un code ; contrairement au scripturo-cosmologique, elle ne reconduit pas un ordre du monde ; contrairement au sacral non étatique, elle ne procède pas par présence immédiate ; contrairement au techno-logistique, elle n’ordonne rien au nom de l’efficacité. Elle institue un espace où l’obligation procède de la reconnaissance d’un énoncé tenu pour absolu, et où toute variation se mesure à la fidélité à cette source. +Ce mode de régulation distingue nettement l'archicration théologique des +autres méta-régimes. Contrairement au scripturo-normatif, elle ne repose +pas sur l'application d'un code ; contrairement au +scripturo-cosmologique, elle ne reconduit pas un ordre du monde ; +contrairement au sacral non étatique, elle ne procède pas par présence +immédiate ; contrairement au techno-logistique, elle n'ordonne rien au +nom de l'efficacité. Elle institue un espace où l'obligation procède de +la reconnaissance d'un énoncé tenu pour absolu, et où toute variation se +mesure à la fidélité à cette source. -L’archicration théologique se caractérise ainsi par une configuration singulière : une arcalité fondée sur la transcendance de la parole révélée, une cratialité exercée par la fidélité interprétative et institutionnelle à cette parole, et une archicration opérée dans les scènes où cette parole est rejouée, transmise et gardée. Elle ne commande pas au sens juridique, ne coordonne pas au sens fonctionnel, ne reflète pas au sens cosmologique : elle oblige par la provenance absolue de la parole. C’est en cela qu’elle constitue une forme archicratique proprement irréductible. +L'archicration théologique se caractérise ainsi par une configuration +singulière : une arcalité fondée sur la transcendance de la parole +révélée, une cratialité exercée par la fidélité interprétative et +institutionnelle à cette parole, et une archicration opérée dans les +scènes où cette parole est rejouée, transmise et gardée. Elle ne +commande pas au sens juridique, ne coordonne pas au sens fonctionnel, ne +reflète pas au sens cosmologique : elle oblige par la provenance absolue +de la parole. C'est en cela qu'elle constitue une forme archicratique +proprement irréductible. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe. ### 2.2.7 — *Archicrations historiographiques* -À côté des méta-régimes fondés sur la révélation divine, l’ordonnancement cosmique ou la normativité impersonnelle du code, un autre type de configuration archicratique émerge très tôt dans l’histoire humaine : celui qui s’origine dans l’agencement scripturaire du passé, dans l’élaboration de récits organisant la transmission du pouvoir, la légitimation des règnes, la naturalisation des hiérarchies et la configuration des appartenances. Ce régime — que nous désignons ici par le syntagme *archicration historiographique* — ne fonde pas l’obligation sur une voix divine ou une structure du monde, mais sur l’inscription du temps politique, l’enregistrement narratif du pouvoir et la sacralisation implicite de la filiation dynastique. +À côté des méta-régimes fondés sur la révélation divine, +l'ordonnancement cosmique ou la normativité impersonnelle du code, un +autre type de configuration archicratique émerge très tôt dans +l'histoire humaine : celui qui s'origine dans l'agencement scripturaire +du passé, dans l'élaboration de récits organisant la transmission du +pouvoir, la légitimation des règnes, la naturalisation des hiérarchies +et la configuration des appartenances. Ce régime — que nous désignons +ici par le syntagme *archicration historiographique* — ne fonde pas +l'obligation sur une voix divine ou une structure du monde, mais sur +l'inscription du temps politique, l'enregistrement narratif du pouvoir +et la sacralisation implicite de la filiation dynastique. -C’est dans les inscriptions royales, les épopées fondatrices, les chroniques de cour, les généalogies officielles, les annales impériales, que se déploie cette modalité spécifique de régulation par l’écrit : non pour énoncer ce qui devrait être, mais pour fixer ce qui fut — et par cette fixation même, en faire le socle de l’ordre présent. Comme l’a montré Mario Liverani, dans le cas des monarchies mésopotamiennes, les récits royaux n’avaient pas pour fonction de rapporter objectivement des faits, mais d’organiser la mémoire du pouvoir en légitimant l’héritage dynastique (*Myth and Politics in Ancient Near Eastern Historiography*, 2004). En cela, ce n’est pas une prescription, mais un héritage scripturaire du pouvoir, où l’archive fonde la continuité de l’ordre. +C'est dans les inscriptions royales, les épopées fondatrices, les +chroniques de cour, les généalogies officielles, les annales impériales, +que se déploie cette modalité spécifique de régulation par l'écrit : non +pour énoncer ce qui devrait être, mais pour fixer ce qui fut — et par +cette fixation même, en faire le socle de l'ordre présent. Comme l'a +montré Mario Liverani, dans le cas des monarchies mésopotamiennes, les +récits royaux n'avaient pas pour fonction de rapporter objectivement des +faits, mais d'organiser la mémoire du pouvoir en légitimant l'héritage +dynastique (*Myth and Politics in Ancient Near Eastern Historiography*, +2004). En cela, ce n'est pas une prescription, mais un héritage +scripturaire du pouvoir, où l'archive fonde la continuité de l'ordre. -L’historicité n’est pas ici mémoire individuelle, ni science critique, mais mode opératoire du lien politique : elle fonde la stabilité par la mise en intrigue et l’ancrage scripturaire des gestes de fondation. Cette régulation est activée par des figures intermédiaires — scribes de cour, historiographes officiels, clercs chroniqueurs — dont la tâche n’est pas d’analyser, mais de figer un ordre narratif jugé fondateur. +L'historicité n'est pas ici mémoire individuelle, ni science critique, +mais mode opératoire du lien politique : elle fonde la stabilité par la +mise en intrigue et l'ancrage scripturaire des gestes de fondation. +Cette régulation est activée par des figures intermédiaires — scribes +de cour, historiographes officiels, clercs chroniqueurs — dont la +tâche n'est pas d'analyser, mais de figer un ordre narratif jugé +fondateur. -Dans ce méta-régime, l’arcalité procède de la mise en intrigue du passé politique. Ce qui fait ici fondement n’est ni une norme abstraite, ni une révélation, ni un ordre cosmique, mais le fait qu’une séquence d’événements — règnes, fondations, conquêtes, restaurations — ait été retenue, classée et transmise comme trame légitime. Le temps raconté devient ainsi une matrice d’obligation : ce qui a été narrativement stabilisé comme fondateur acquiert une autorité durable sur le présent. +Dans ce méta-régime, l'arcalité procède de la mise en intrigue du passé +politique. Ce qui fait ici fondement n'est ni une norme abstraite, ni +une révélation, ni un ordre cosmique, mais le fait qu'une séquence +d'événements — règnes, fondations, conquêtes, restaurations — ait +été retenue, classée et transmise comme trame légitime. Le temps raconté +devient ainsi une matrice d'obligation : ce qui a été narrativement +stabilisé comme fondateur acquiert une autorité durable sur le présent. -La forme canonique de cette arcalité est l’annale, la chronique ou la généalogie officielle. Des annales assyriennes aux chroniques impériales chinoises, l’histoire enregistrée n’est pas une simple collection de faits, mais une technique de linéarisation du temps politique. Comme l’ont montré Mario Liverani pour le Proche-Orient ancien et Yuri Pines pour la Chine impériale, ces récits ne décrivent pas seulement le pouvoir : ils le stabilisent en inscrivant chaque règne dans une chaîne de précédents recevables. L’ordre n’y est pas donné : il est hérité, raconté et rendu tenable par sa transmission. +La forme canonique de cette arcalité est l'annale, la chronique ou la +généalogie officielle. Des annales assyriennes aux chroniques impériales +chinoises, l'histoire enregistrée n'est pas une simple collection de +faits, mais une technique de linéarisation du temps politique. Comme +l'ont montré Mario Liverani pour le Proche-Orient ancien et Yuri Pines +pour la Chine impériale, ces récits ne décrivent pas seulement le +pouvoir : ils le stabilisent en inscrivant chaque règne dans une chaîne +de précédents recevables. L'ordre n'y est pas donné : il est hérité, +raconté et rendu tenable par sa transmission. -Cette arcalité historiographique n’est donc pas seulement mémoire du passé, mais mise en forme d’une antériorité recevable. Ce qui compte n’est pas que les événements aient eu lieu au sens brut, mais qu’ils aient été retenus dans une séquence intelligible, ordonnée selon des critères de fondation, de succession, de rupture et de restauration. Le passé n’oblige qu’à la condition d’avoir été narrativement stabilisé. C’est pourquoi l’historiographie royale, dynastique ou impériale ne transmet pas d’abord une vérité critique, mais une structure de continuité : elle distribue les points d’origine légitimes, fixe les lignées recevables et transforme la mémoire en sol d’autorisation du présent. +Cette arcalité historiographique n'est donc pas seulement mémoire du +passé, mais mise en forme d'une antériorité recevable. Ce qui compte +n'est pas que les événements aient eu lieu au sens brut, mais qu'ils +aient été retenus dans une séquence intelligible, ordonnée selon des +critères de fondation, de succession, de rupture et de restauration. Le +passé n'oblige qu'à la condition d'avoir été narrativement stabilisé. +C'est pourquoi l'historiographie royale, dynastique ou impériale ne +transmet pas d'abord une vérité critique, mais une structure de +continuité : elle distribue les points d'origine légitimes, fixe les +lignées recevables et transforme la mémoire en sol d'autorisation du +présent. -En ce sens, l’arcalité historiographique ne repose pas sur le passé comme tel, mais sur le passé configuré. Elle suppose un travail de composition par lequel certains événements deviennent décisifs, d’autres secondaires, d’autres enfin invisibles. Ce régime ne demande donc pas seulement que l’on se souvienne, mais que l’on se souvienne selon une forme. L’histoire agit ici comme matrice de hiérarchisation temporelle : elle ordonne ce qui mérite d’être transmis, ce qui peut être invoqué, et ce qui doit demeurer à l’arrière-plan pour que la continuité du corps politique reste lisible. Le fondement n’est pas l’ancienneté brute, mais la sélection narrative de ce qui peut encore valoir comme origine. +En ce sens, l'arcalité historiographique ne repose pas sur le passé +comme tel, mais sur le passé configuré. Elle suppose un travail de +composition par lequel certains événements deviennent décisifs, d'autres +secondaires, d'autres enfin invisibles. Ce régime ne demande donc pas +seulement que l'on se souvienne, mais que l'on se souvienne selon une +forme. L'histoire agit ici comme matrice de hiérarchisation temporelle : +elle ordonne ce qui mérite d'être transmis, ce qui peut être invoqué, et +ce qui doit demeurer à l'arrière-plan pour que la continuité du corps +politique reste lisible. Le fondement n'est pas l'ancienneté brute, mais +la sélection narrative de ce qui peut encore valoir comme origine. -La cratialité historiographique s’exerce par la puissance du précédent. Elle ne commande ni par injonction directe, ni par sacralité révélée, mais par l’effet d’orientation produit par des figures, des règnes et des gestes tenus pour exemplaires. Le pouvoir s’y enracine dans une mémoire narrative qui distribue silencieusement les modèles recevables de l’action légitime. +La cratialité historiographique s'exerce par la puissance du précédent. +Elle ne commande ni par injonction directe, ni par sacralité révélée, +mais par l'effet d'orientation produit par des figures, des règnes et +des gestes tenus pour exemplaires. Le pouvoir s'y enracine dans une +mémoire narrative qui distribue silencieusement les modèles recevables +de l'action légitime. -Dans le monde assyrien comme dans la Chine impériale, cette puissance se laisse saisir avec netteté. Les annales royales assyriennes mettent en forme une continuité héroïque rendant chaque nouvelle conquête intelligible comme reprise d’un modèle déjà validé ; les Shǐjì de Sima Qian construisent, quant à eux, un répertoire de figures exemplaires à partir duquel l’action présente peut se légitimer. Dans les deux cas, le récit n’ordonne pas explicitement : il configure un horizon d’autorité auquel les gouvernants doivent se raccorder pour apparaître recevables. +Dans le monde assyrien comme dans la Chine impériale, cette puissance se +laisse saisir avec netteté. Les annales royales assyriennes mettent en +forme une continuité héroïque rendant chaque nouvelle conquête +intelligible comme reprise d'un modèle déjà validé ; les Shǐjì de Sima +Qian construisent, quant à eux, un répertoire de figures exemplaires à +partir duquel l'action présente peut se légitimer. Dans les deux cas, le +récit n'ordonne pas explicitement : il configure un horizon d'autorité +auquel les gouvernants doivent se raccorder pour apparaître recevables. -Si la cratialité organise la fidélité au précédent, l’archicration historiographique apparaît lorsque cette fidélité devient objet d’arbitrage. Elle se manifeste dans les moments où plusieurs récits du passé entrent en concurrence et où il faut distinguer entre le récit autorisé, le récit toléré et le récit disqualifié. L’histoire n’est alors plus seulement mémoire ou archive : elle devient dispositif de régulation des versions recevables du passé commun. +Si la cratialité organise la fidélité au précédent, l'archicration +historiographique apparaît lorsque cette fidélité devient objet +d'arbitrage. Elle se manifeste dans les moments où plusieurs récits du +passé entrent en concurrence et où il faut distinguer entre le récit +autorisé, le récit toléré et le récit disqualifié. L'histoire n'est +alors plus seulement mémoire ou archive : elle devient dispositif de +régulation des versions recevables du passé commun. -Les révisions historiographiques organisées sous les Song en offrent un exemple net. Le savoir historique y est encadré par des instances savantes mandatées pour compiler, sélectionner et valider les récits compatibles avec la morale politique confucéenne et avec la continuité dynastique. Dans un registre différent, la damnatio memoriae romaine montre qu’un pouvoir peut maintenir sa cohérence en retranchant un nom, une figure ou une séquence de la trame admise. Dans les deux cas, l’enjeu n’est pas seulement d’écrire l’histoire, mais de déterminer ce qui peut continuer à faire mémoire publique. +Les révisions historiographiques organisées sous les Song en offrent un +exemple net. Le savoir historique y est encadré par des instances +savantes mandatées pour compiler, sélectionner et valider les récits +compatibles avec la morale politique confucéenne et avec la continuité +dynastique. Dans un registre différent, la damnatio memoriae romaine +montre qu'un pouvoir peut maintenir sa cohérence en retranchant un nom, +une figure ou une séquence de la trame admise. Dans les deux cas, +l'enjeu n'est pas seulement d'écrire l'histoire, mais de déterminer ce +qui peut continuer à faire mémoire publique. -L’archicration historiographique ne se confond donc ni avec la simple censure ni avec l’écriture comme telle. Elle suppose un lieu de tri, de confrontation et de décision sur les formes narratives admissibles. C’est là que l’histoire devient tribunal des récits : non pour juger les faits eux-mêmes, mais pour statuer sur la version du passé qui pourra continuer à soutenir la co-viabilité politique. +L'archicration historiographique ne se confond donc ni avec la simple +censure ni avec l'écriture comme telle. Elle suppose un lieu de tri, de +confrontation et de décision sur les formes narratives admissibles. +C'est là que l'histoire devient tribunal des récits : non pour juger les +faits eux-mêmes, mais pour statuer sur la version du passé qui pourra +continuer à soutenir la co-viabilité politique. -C’est dans cette opération de sélection que se joue la spécificité proprement archicratique du régime historiographique. La mémoire ne régule pas parce qu’elle conserve, mais parce qu’elle filtre. Entre le passé disponible et le passé admissible, il existe un travail de hiérarchisation, de clôture et parfois de retranchement qui détermine ce qui pourra continuer d’agir comme précédent légitime. L’archicration historiographique intervient précisément à ce niveau : lorsque la continuité du corps politique dépend de la version du passé que l’on décide de retenir, d’enseigner, de commémorer ou d’écarter. L’histoire cesse alors d’être simple récit des origines pour devenir instance de recevabilité du présent. +C'est dans cette opération de sélection que se joue la spécificité +proprement archicratique du régime historiographique. La mémoire ne +régule pas parce qu'elle conserve, mais parce qu'elle filtre. Entre le +passé disponible et le passé admissible, il existe un travail de +hiérarchisation, de clôture et parfois de retranchement qui détermine ce +qui pourra continuer d'agir comme précédent légitime. L'archicration +historiographique intervient précisément à ce niveau : lorsque la +continuité du corps politique dépend de la version du passé que l'on +décide de retenir, d'enseigner, de commémorer ou d'écarter. L'histoire +cesse alors d'être simple récit des origines pour devenir instance de +recevabilité du présent. -C’est pourquoi l’archicration historiographique ne doit pas être rabattue sur la seule production de récits officiels. Elle commence véritablement là où surgit une épreuve de compatibilité entre plusieurs passés possibles. Tant qu’une narration s’impose sans friction, elle relève surtout de la cratialité du précédent ; mais dès lors que la continuité politique exige de départager, de recomposer ou de neutraliser des versions concurrentes, une scène archicratique s’ouvre proprement. Celle-ci peut être solennelle ou discrète, publique ou fermée, doctrinale ou administrative ; dans tous les cas, elle engage une décision sur ce qui pourra continuer de faire autorité comme mémoire commune. Le passé n’y est plus seulement transmis : il y est régulé. +C'est pourquoi l'archicration historiographique ne doit pas être +rabattue sur la seule production de récits officiels. Elle commence +véritablement là où surgit une épreuve de compatibilité entre plusieurs +passés possibles. Tant qu'une narration s'impose sans friction, elle +relève surtout de la cratialité du précédent ; mais dès lors que la +continuité politique exige de départager, de recomposer ou de +neutraliser des versions concurrentes, une scène archicratique s'ouvre +proprement. Celle-ci peut être solennelle ou discrète, publique ou +fermée, doctrinale ou administrative ; dans tous les cas, elle engage +une décision sur ce qui pourra continuer de faire autorité comme mémoire +commune. Le passé n'y est plus seulement transmis : il y est régulé. -Le récit historiographique n’agit pas seulement comme archive : il est relancé dans des dispositifs de lecture, de commémoration et de réactivation publique qui lui donnent une efficacité régulatrice directe. Ce qui oblige n’est pas le passé en lui-même, mais sa reprise réglée dans des scènes où il redevient matrice d’orientation commune. L’histoire cesse alors d’être simple mémoire pour devenir présence narrative du fondement. +Le récit historiographique n'agit pas seulement comme archive : il est +relancé dans des dispositifs de lecture, de commémoration et de +réactivation publique qui lui donnent une efficacité régulatrice +directe. Ce qui oblige n'est pas le passé en lui-même, mais sa reprise +réglée dans des scènes où il redevient matrice d'orientation commune. +L'histoire cesse alors d'être simple mémoire pour devenir présence +narrative du fondement. -Les lectures dynastiques à la cour ottomane en donnent un exemple éclairant : la récitation d’extraits des Tevârih-i Âl-i Osman devant les dignitaires du pouvoir ne relevait ni du culte ni de l’érudition gratuite, mais d’une réinscription régulière du présent dans la continuité des gestes fondateurs. L’histoire canonisée, lue à voix haute dans un cadre institué, devenait ainsi condition de recevabilité des décisions et support de l’alignement politique. +Les lectures dynastiques à la cour ottomane en donnent un exemple +éclairant : la récitation d'extraits des Tevârih-i Âl-i Osman devant les +dignitaires du pouvoir ne relevait ni du culte ni de l'érudition +gratuite, mais d'une réinscription régulière du présent dans la +continuité des gestes fondateurs. L'histoire canonisée, lue à voix haute +dans un cadre institué, devenait ainsi condition de recevabilité des +décisions et support de l'alignement politique. -L’archicration historiographique prend ici sa forme pleinement active : elle organise les conditions dans lesquelles le passé peut être rejoué comme autorité. Ce n’est pas le récit seul qui régule, mais sa réactivation publique, filtrée et périodique, par laquelle les figures, les filiations et les précédents redeviennent opérateurs de co-viabilité. +L'archicration historiographique prend ici sa forme pleinement active : +elle organise les conditions dans lesquelles le passé peut être rejoué +comme autorité. Ce n'est pas le récit seul qui régule, mais sa +réactivation publique, filtrée et périodique, par laquelle les figures, +les filiations et les précédents redeviennent opérateurs de +co-viabilité. -Comme tout méta-régime, l’archicration historiographique connaît ses fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque la chaîne narrative perd en lisibilité, lorsque le répertoire des figures fondatrices se sature au point de devenir décoratif, lorsque le récit entre en concurrence avec d’autres régimes d’autorité, ou encore lorsqu’il se réduit à une propagande tactique sans profondeur de transmission. Dans tous ces cas, ce n’est pas l’histoire qui disparaît, mais sa capacité à orienter durablement le présent. +Comme tout méta-régime, l'archicration historiographique connaît ses +fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque la chaîne narrative perd en +lisibilité, lorsque le répertoire des figures fondatrices se sature au +point de devenir décoratif, lorsque le récit entre en concurrence avec +d'autres régimes d'autorité, ou encore lorsqu'il se réduit à une +propagande tactique sans profondeur de transmission. Dans tous ces cas, +ce n'est pas l'histoire qui disparaît, mais sa capacité à orienter +durablement le présent. -Ces fragilités permettent de préciser le seuil propre de son efficacité. Pour qu’un récit historiographique régule véritablement, il ne suffit pas qu’il existe, ni même qu’il soit répété : il faut encore qu’il demeure lisible comme chaîne de précédents, crédible comme trame de continuité, et réactivable dans des scènes où le collectif peut continuer à s’y reconnaître. Lorsque cette triple condition se défait, l’histoire demeure peut-être disponible comme mémoire, mais elle cesse d’opérer comme puissance d’orientation. +Ces fragilités permettent de préciser le seuil propre de son efficacité. +Pour qu'un récit historiographique régule véritablement, il ne suffit +pas qu'il existe, ni même qu'il soit répété : il faut encore qu'il +demeure lisible comme chaîne de précédents, crédible comme trame de +continuité, et réactivable dans des scènes où le collectif peut +continuer à s'y reconnaître. Lorsque cette triple condition se défait, +l'histoire demeure peut-être disponible comme mémoire, mais elle cesse +d'opérer comme puissance d'orientation. -Ce qui fait la force propre de ce régime apparaît alors plus nettement : une arcalité fondée sur la stabilisation narrative du passé, une cratialité exercée par la puissance du précédent, et une archicration située dans le tri, la validation et la relance publique des récits recevables. L’histoire n’y agit ni comme simple souvenir, ni comme savoir neutre, mais comme matrice de légitimité et de continuité. +Ce qui fait la force propre de ce régime apparaît alors plus nettement : +une arcalité fondée sur la stabilisation narrative du passé, une +cratialité exercée par la puissance du précédent, et une archicration +située dans le tri, la validation et la relance publique des récits +recevables. L'histoire n'y agit ni comme simple souvenir, ni comme +savoir neutre, mais comme matrice de légitimité et de continuité. -L’archicration historiographique désigne ainsi une forme de régulation dans laquelle les sociétés tiennent ensemble par un passé sélectionné, raconté et réactivé comme autorité commune. Elle ne commande ni par décret, ni par révélation, ni par seule fonctionnalité : elle oblige par héritage narratif. Sa force propre tient à ceci qu’elle produit de la continuité sans avoir besoin de tout formaliser en norme explicite. Le précédent y agit comme opérateur silencieux d’orientation ; la mémoire validée, comme cadre implicite du recevable ; la relance publique du récit, comme scène de réinscription du collectif dans sa propre filiation. +L'archicration historiographique désigne ainsi une forme de régulation +dans laquelle les sociétés tiennent ensemble par un passé sélectionné, +raconté et réactivé comme autorité commune. Elle ne commande ni par +décret, ni par révélation, ni par seule fonctionnalité : elle oblige par +héritage narratif. Sa force propre tient à ceci qu'elle produit de la +continuité sans avoir besoin de tout formaliser en norme explicite. Le +précédent y agit comme opérateur silencieux d'orientation ; la mémoire +validée, comme cadre implicite du recevable ; la relance publique du +récit, comme scène de réinscription du collectif dans sa propre +filiation. -En cela, le régime historiographique occupe une place spécifique dans la typologie archicratique. Il montre qu’une société peut stabiliser la co-viabilité non seulement par des règles, des croyances ou des dispositifs fonctionnels, mais aussi par la maîtrise des récits à partir desquels elle se comprend elle-même comme légitime, continue et transmissible. L’obligation narrative n’est ni un supplément rhétorique ni un simple décor symbolique : elle constitue une modalité effective du gouvernement des appartenances, des fidélités et des seuils du pensable politique. +En cela, le régime historiographique occupe une place spécifique dans la +typologie archicratique. Il montre qu'une société peut stabiliser la +co-viabilité non seulement par des règles, des croyances ou des +dispositifs fonctionnels, mais aussi par la maîtrise des récits à partir +desquels elle se comprend elle-même comme légitime, continue et +transmissible. L'obligation narrative n'est ni un supplément rhétorique +ni un simple décor symbolique : elle constitue une modalité effective du +gouvernement des appartenances, des fidélités et des seuils du pensable +politique. -Sous ce rapport, l’archicration historiographique révèle une propriété majeure de la régulation politique : une collectivité ne tient pas seulement par ce qu’elle croit, par ce qu’elle prescrit ou par ce qu’elle organise matériellement, mais aussi par ce qu’elle se raconte comme ayant déjà tenu. Le récit validé ne vient pas après l’ordre ; il participe à sa reproduction en donnant au présent la forme d’une continuation recevable. C’est là sa force silencieuse : produire de la normativité sans passer nécessairement par l’énoncé explicite d’une règle. Là où un passé est sélectionné, mis en intrigue et publiquement relancé comme mémoire légitime, une obligation narrative prend corps et travaille en profondeur la co-viabilité du groupe. +Sous ce rapport, l'archicration historiographique révèle une propriété +majeure de la régulation politique : une collectivité ne tient pas +seulement par ce qu'elle croit, par ce qu'elle prescrit ou par ce +qu'elle organise matériellement, mais aussi par ce qu'elle se raconte +comme ayant déjà tenu. Le récit validé ne vient pas après l'ordre ; il +participe à sa reproduction en donnant au présent la forme d'une +continuation recevable. C'est là sa force silencieuse : produire de la +normativité sans passer nécessairement par l'énoncé explicite d'une +règle. Là où un passé est sélectionné, mis en intrigue et publiquement +relancé comme mémoire légitime, une obligation narrative prend corps et +travaille en profondeur la co-viabilité du groupe. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe. -La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : non plus celui de la mémoire politique narrée, mais celui de l’encodage savant du savoir. Avec l’archicration épistémique, l’ordre n’est plus d’abord raconté : il est classé, transmis, validé et reproduit à travers des matrices cognitives spécialisées, dont l’autorité tient moins à la filiation du passé qu’à la tenue réglée des savoirs. +La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : non +plus celui de la mémoire politique narrée, mais celui de l'encodage +savant du savoir. Avec l'archicration épistémique, l'ordre n'est plus +d'abord raconté : il est classé, transmis, validé et reproduit à travers +des matrices cognitives spécialisées, dont l'autorité tient moins à la +filiation du passé qu'à la tenue réglée des savoirs. ### 2.2.8 — *Archicrations épistémiques* -Là où d’autres méta-régimes archicratiques fondent l’obligation sur la révélation, sur l’ordre cosmique ou sur la mémoire narrée du pouvoir, le régime épistémique la fonde sur la forme instituée du savoir. L’ordre n’y est plus principalement dit, raconté ou hérité : il est défini, classé, formalisé, transmis et validé selon des schèmes cognitifs stables. C’est cette formalisation du réel comme principe de régulation que nous nommons ici arcalité épistémique. +Là où d'autres méta-régimes archicratiques fondent l'obligation sur la +révélation, sur l'ordre cosmique ou sur la mémoire narrée du pouvoir, le +régime épistémique la fonde sur la forme instituée du savoir. L'ordre +n'y est plus principalement dit, raconté ou hérité : il est défini, +classé, formalisé, transmis et validé selon des schèmes cognitifs +stables. C'est cette formalisation du réel comme principe de régulation +que nous nommons ici arcalité épistémique. -La singularité de ce régime tient au basculement qu’il opère : on passe de la mise en intrigue à la mise en tableau, du récit à la matrice, du précédent à la procédure. Le savoir n’y vaut pas comme supplément de l’ordre, mais comme son infrastructure silencieuse. Il ne s’agit plus d’autoriser le présent par ce qui fut, mais de le rendre intelligible, opérable et reproductible à partir de corpus, de classifications, de protocoles et de formats de preuve. +La singularité de ce régime tient au basculement qu'il opère : on passe +de la mise en intrigue à la mise en tableau, du récit à la matrice, du +précédent à la procédure. Le savoir n'y vaut pas comme supplément de +l'ordre, mais comme son infrastructure silencieuse. Il ne s'agit plus +d'autoriser le présent par ce qui fut, mais de le rendre intelligible, +opérable et reproductible à partir de corpus, de classifications, de +protocoles et de formats de preuve. -Les instruments et l’instrumentation occupent, dans ce régime, une position transversale. Ils relèvent de l’arcalité lorsqu’ils stabilisent un format recevable de preuve, de la cratialité lorsqu’ils rendent l’enquête effectivement opératoire, et de l’archicration lorsqu’ils deviennent eux-mêmes objets d’épreuve, de reprise et de contestation méthodique. La mesure ne devient ainsi pleinement archicratique qu’à la condition de pouvoir être discutée, recalibrée, confrontée à d’autres mesures et réinscrite dans des protocoles explicites ; sans cela, elle n’est qu’un opérateur technique ou un effet d’autorité. +Les instruments et l'instrumentation occupent, dans ce régime, une +position transversale. Ils relèvent de l'arcalité lorsqu'ils stabilisent +un format recevable de preuve, de la cratialité lorsqu'ils rendent +l'enquête effectivement opératoire, et de l'archicration lorsqu'ils +deviennent eux-mêmes objets d'épreuve, de reprise et de contestation +méthodique. La mesure ne devient ainsi pleinement archicratique qu'à la +condition de pouvoir être discutée, recalibrée, confrontée à d'autres +mesures et réinscrite dans des protocoles explicites ; sans cela, elle +n'est qu'un opérateur technique ou un effet d'autorité. -L’arcalité épistémique réside ainsi dans la capacité de certains systèmes de savoir à organiser le réel en le nommant, en le découpant et en le reliant selon une cohérence propre. Le monde devient lisible à travers des nomenclatures, des grammaires, des algorithmes, des schémas médicaux ou des séries démonstratives. Ce qui oblige n’est plus un commandement, mais une structure d’intelligibilité tenue pour valide parce qu’elle est transmissible, cohérente et opératoire. +L'arcalité épistémique réside ainsi dans la capacité de certains +systèmes de savoir à organiser le réel en le nommant, en le découpant et +en le reliant selon une cohérence propre. Le monde devient lisible à +travers des nomenclatures, des grammaires, des algorithmes, des schémas +médicaux ou des séries démonstratives. Ce qui oblige n'est plus un +commandement, mais une structure d'intelligibilité tenue pour valide +parce qu'elle est transmissible, cohérente et opératoire. -Cette arcalité se laisse saisir dans plusieurs familles de corpus. Les listes lexicales mésopotamiennes, les textes mathématiques babyloniens, les traités médicaux égyptiens ou encore la grammaire de Pāṇini ne valent pas seulement par leur contenu ; ils valent par la forme d’ordre qu’ils installent. Chacun de ces ensembles ne décrit pas simplement un domaine : il le découpe, le hiérarchise, en stabilise les unités pertinentes et impose les relations selon lesquelles il peut être pensé. Le savoir agit alors comme matrice d’intelligibilité. +Cette arcalité se laisse saisir dans plusieurs familles de corpus. Les +listes lexicales mésopotamiennes, les textes mathématiques babyloniens, +les traités médicaux égyptiens ou encore la grammaire de Pāṇini ne +valent pas seulement par leur contenu ; ils valent par la forme d'ordre +qu'ils installent. Chacun de ces ensembles ne décrit pas simplement un +domaine : il le découpe, le hiérarchise, en stabilise les unités +pertinentes et impose les relations selon lesquelles il peut être pensé. +Le savoir agit alors comme matrice d'intelligibilité. -On pourrait dire, de manière plus précise, que ces corpus ne se limitent pas à contenir des connaissances : ils instituent des régimes de visibilité intellectuelle. Ainsi la liste lexicale fixe les voisinages admissibles entre les choses. La table mathématique impose un espace de relations où certaines opérations deviennent immédiatement pensables et d’autres demeurent hors champ. Le traité médical, de même, distribue des correspondances stables entre signes, causes et interventions. Quant à la grammaire, elle ne codifie pas seulement un usage ; elle définit les conditions mêmes d’une parole correcte. Dans tous ces cas, le savoir n’intervient pas après coup sur un monde déjà donné : il préforme les voies par lesquelles ce monde pourra être identifié, traité et transmis. +On pourrait dire, de manière plus précise, que ces corpus ne se limitent +pas à contenir des connaissances : ils instituent des régimes de +visibilité intellectuelle. Ainsi la liste lexicale fixe les voisinages +admissibles entre les choses. La table mathématique impose un espace de +relations où certaines opérations deviennent immédiatement pensables et +d'autres demeurent hors champ. Le traité médical, de même, distribue des +correspondances stables entre signes, causes et interventions. Quant à +la grammaire, elle ne codifie pas seulement un usage ; elle définit les +conditions mêmes d'une parole correcte. Dans tous ces cas, le savoir +n'intervient pas après coup sur un monde déjà donné : il préforme les +voies par lesquelles ce monde pourra être identifié, traité et transmis. -Ce régime s’incarne dans des formes scripturaires spécifiques : listes, tableaux, schémas, nomenclatures, suites démonstratives. Comme l’ont montré Jack Goody, Reviel Netz ou Michel Foucault dans des registres différents, ces formats n’enregistrent pas seulement des données : ils organisent l’acte même de penser. La disposition spatiale du savoir, sa mise en série, sa segmentation et sa logique classificatoire produisent une contrainte discrète mais décisive. L’écriture n’est pas seulement support ; elle devient opérateur de découpe du réel. +Ce régime s'incarne dans des formes scripturaires spécifiques : listes, +tableaux, schémas, nomenclatures, suites démonstratives. Comme l'ont +montré Jack Goody, Reviel Netz ou Michel Foucault dans des registres +différents, ces formats n'enregistrent pas seulement des données : ils +organisent l'acte même de penser. La disposition spatiale du savoir, sa +mise en série, sa segmentation et sa logique classificatoire produisent +une contrainte discrète mais décisive. L'écriture n'est pas seulement +support ; elle devient opérateur de découpe du réel. -De là procède une pédagogie implicite. Les écoles scribales, médicales ou grammaticales ne transmettent pas seulement des contenus ; elles inculquent des gestes mentaux, des séquences de traitement, des manières recevables de classer, de déduire et de restituer. L’arcalité épistémique est donc aussi une orthopédie cognitive : elle forme des sujets capables de penser selon un ordre stabilisé, et non de simplement accumuler des connaissances. +De là procède une pédagogie implicite. Les écoles scribales, médicales +ou grammaticales ne transmettent pas seulement des contenus ; elles +inculquent des gestes mentaux, des séquences de traitement, des manières +recevables de classer, de déduire et de restituer. L'arcalité +épistémique est donc aussi une orthopédie cognitive : elle forme des +sujets capables de penser selon un ordre stabilisé, et non de simplement +accumuler des connaissances. -C’est pourquoi, à son niveau le plus abstrait, l’arcalité épistémique ne renvoie plus à un ordre extérieur, mais à un cosmos cognitif interne, produit par la cohérence d’un système de savoir. Chaque corpus — grammatical, médical, mathématique — devient une micro-cosmologie, fermée, complète, autorégulée. Elle ne dit pas le monde tel qu’il est seulement : elle prescrit les conditions sous lesquelles il pourra être pensé, transmis, interprété et appliqué. +C'est pourquoi, à son niveau le plus abstrait, l'arcalité épistémique ne +renvoie plus à un ordre extérieur, mais à un cosmos cognitif interne, +produit par la cohérence d'un système de savoir. Chaque corpus — grammatical, médical, mathématique — devient une micro-cosmologie, +fermée, complète, autorégulée. Elle ne dit pas le monde tel qu'il est +seulement : elle prescrit les conditions sous lesquelles il pourra être +pensé, transmis, interprété et appliqué. -Mais un tel ordre cognitif ne suffit pas à lui seul à réguler. Encore faut-il qu’il soit porté, gardé, manié et distribué par des agents capables d’en assurer la tenue pratique. C’est précisément à ce niveau que s’ouvre la cratialité épistémique : non plus dans la cohérence intrinsèque du savoir, mais dans sa prise en charge différenciée par des figures compétentes, par des lieux d’apprentissage, par des procédures de transmission qui rendent certains sujets autorisés à dire le vrai et d’autres condamnés à s’en remettre à eux. +Mais un tel ordre cognitif ne suffit pas à lui seul à réguler. Encore +faut-il qu'il soit porté, gardé, manié et distribué par des agents +capables d'en assurer la tenue pratique. C'est précisément à ce niveau +que s'ouvre la cratialité épistémique : non plus dans la cohérence +intrinsèque du savoir, mais dans sa prise en charge différenciée par des +figures compétentes, par des lieux d'apprentissage, par des procédures +de transmission qui rendent certains sujets autorisés à dire le vrai et +d'autres condamnés à s'en remettre à eux. -La cratialité épistémique ne s’exerce ni par charisme, ni par souveraineté territoriale, ni par mémoire dynastique. Elle s’actualise dans la maîtrise différentielle des savoirs institués, c’est-à-dire dans l’accès sélectif à un corpus, à un langage formel, à une syntaxe opératoire du vrai. L’archicrate n’est plus ici roi, prêtre ou chroniqueur : il est scribe, médecin, astronome, grammairien, maître, commentateur — autrement dit détenteur d’une compétence reconnue qui lui permet d’interpréter le réel sous une forme recevable. +La cratialité épistémique ne s'exerce ni par charisme, ni par +souveraineté territoriale, ni par mémoire dynastique. Elle s'actualise +dans la maîtrise différentielle des savoirs institués, c'est-à-dire dans +l'accès sélectif à un corpus, à un langage formel, à une syntaxe +opératoire du vrai. L'archicrate n'est plus ici roi, prêtre ou +chroniqueur : il est scribe, médecin, astronome, grammairien, maître, +commentateur — autrement dit détenteur d'une compétence reconnue qui +lui permet d'interpréter le réel sous une forme recevable. -Dans cette configuration, la force ne passe plus par l’épée ni par l’inspiration divine, mais par la capacité à lire ce que d’autres ne peuvent lire, à manipuler des symboles que d’autres ne comprennent pas, à inférer des règles là où les profanes ne voient qu’un monde opaque. Le pouvoir s’exerce alors sans geste autoritaire visible, mais par supériorité cognitive : celui qui sait déchiffrer, classer, diagnostiquer ou démontrer oriente silencieusement l’interprétation du réel. +Dans cette configuration, la force ne passe plus par l'épée ni par +l'inspiration divine, mais par la capacité à lire ce que d'autres ne +peuvent lire, à manipuler des symboles que d'autres ne comprennent pas, +à inférer des règles là où les profanes ne voient qu'un monde opaque. Le +pouvoir s'exerce alors sans geste autoritaire visible, mais par +supériorité cognitive : celui qui sait déchiffrer, classer, +diagnostiquer ou démontrer oriente silencieusement l'interprétation du +réel. -Les études mésopotamiennes ont bien montré que l’apprentissage de l’écriture cunéiforme exigeait des années de formation et instituait une division stricte du travail cognitif. Les initiés de l’É-dubba pouvaient seuls lire certains textes, dresser des comptes, interpréter des présages ou manipuler les répertoires techniques. De même, dans les écoles philosophiques grecques, dans les milieux grammaticaux indiens ou dans les maisons savantes du monde islamique, la compétence intellectuelle devient principe de hiérarchisation : elle sépare le lecteur autorisé du profane, le commentateur accrédité du simple usager, l’interprète légitime de celui qui demeure extérieur au code. +Les études mésopotamiennes ont bien montré que l'apprentissage de +l'écriture cunéiforme exigeait des années de formation et instituait une +division stricte du travail cognitif. Les initiés de l'É-dubba pouvaient +seuls lire certains textes, dresser des comptes, interpréter des +présages ou manipuler les répertoires techniques. De même, dans les +écoles philosophiques grecques, dans les milieux grammaticaux indiens ou +dans les maisons savantes du monde islamique, la compétence +intellectuelle devient principe de hiérarchisation : elle sépare le +lecteur autorisé du profane, le commentateur accrédité du simple usager, +l'interprète légitime de celui qui demeure extérieur au code. -Interpréter, calculer, classer, diagnostiquer sont ainsi des actes d’autorité. Le pouvoir ne consiste pas ici à produire arbitrairement la norme, mais à garantir la validité de son application. Le scribe confirme, le médecin reconnaît, l’enseignant atteste, le maître oriente la répétition correcte. Comme l’ont suggéré, chacun à leur manière, Bruno Latour, Michel Foucault ou Pierre Bourdieu, le savoir agit alors comme principe privilégié de validation : il fonde une autorité qui n’a pas besoin d’être constamment coercitive pour structurer effectivement le champ du recevable. +Interpréter, calculer, classer, diagnostiquer sont ainsi des actes +d'autorité. Le pouvoir ne consiste pas ici à produire arbitrairement la +norme, mais à garantir la validité de son application. Le scribe +confirme, le médecin reconnaît, l'enseignant atteste, le maître oriente +la répétition correcte. Comme l'ont suggéré, chacun à leur manière, +Bruno Latour, Michel Foucault ou Pierre Bourdieu, le savoir agit alors +comme principe privilégié de validation : il fonde une autorité qui n'a +pas besoin d'être constamment coercitive pour structurer effectivement +le champ du recevable. -Si l’arcalité formalise un monde cognitif stable, et si la cratialité distribue les fonctions par monopole de compétence, l’archicration épistémique intervient là où le savoir devient instance explicite de validation, de certification, de clôture et parfois d’exclusion. Elle ne désigne ni l’exercice savant du savoir en général, ni la simple existence de corpus formalisés, mais la scène où une collectivité décide de ce qui fait savoir, de ce qui peut être enseigné, de qui peut exercer et selon quels protocoles. +Si l'arcalité formalise un monde cognitif stable, et si la cratialité +distribue les fonctions par monopole de compétence, l'archicration +épistémique intervient là où le savoir devient instance explicite de +validation, de certification, de clôture et parfois d'exclusion. Elle ne +désigne ni l'exercice savant du savoir en général, ni la simple +existence de corpus formalisés, mais la scène où une collectivité décide +de ce qui fait savoir, de ce qui peut être enseigné, de qui peut exercer +et selon quels protocoles. -Le savoir devient pleinement archicratique lorsqu’il donne lieu à des procédures de certification. Dans les traditions scribales mésopotamiennes, la validation des exercices, la reconnaissance du maître ou l’achèvement d’un cursus distinguent celui qui sait véritablement de celui qui ne fait qu’apprendre. Dans d’autres configurations, l’archicration s’exerce par la hiérarchie des commentaires autorisés, la consécration de certains interprètes, la clôture canonique de certains corpus ou la limitation des usages recevables d’un texte fondateur. Le cœur du régime réside ici : non pas transmettre tout ce qui est su, mais décider de ce qui mérite d’être reconnu comme savoir valide. +Le savoir devient pleinement archicratique lorsqu'il donne lieu à des +procédures de certification. Dans les traditions scribales +mésopotamiennes, la validation des exercices, la reconnaissance du +maître ou l'achèvement d'un cursus distinguent celui qui sait +véritablement de celui qui ne fait qu'apprendre. Dans d'autres +configurations, l'archicration s'exerce par la hiérarchie des +commentaires autorisés, la consécration de certains interprètes, la +clôture canonique de certains corpus ou la limitation des usages +recevables d'un texte fondateur. Le cœur du régime réside ici : non pas +transmettre tout ce qui est su, mais décider de ce qui mérite d'être +reconnu comme savoir valide. -Il faut insister ici sur un point décisif : l’archicration épistémique n’est pas seulement une scène de conservation, mais une scène d’épreuve. Un savoir n’y est pas validé parce qu’il existe déjà, mais parce qu’il franchit des seuils de recevabilité déterminés : exactitude de la restitution, conformité de la méthode, légitimité du support, autorité du maître, compatibilité avec le corpus admis. C’est dans ce passage réglé entre savoir possible et savoir reconnu que se joue l’opération archicratique proprement dite. L’important n’est donc pas seulement la possession du contenu, mais la procédure par laquelle ce contenu devient publiquement, institutionnellement et collectivement tenable comme vrai. +Il faut insister ici sur un point décisif : l'archicration épistémique +n'est pas seulement une scène de conservation, mais une scène d'épreuve. +Un savoir n'y est pas validé parce qu'il existe déjà, mais parce qu'il +franchit des seuils de recevabilité déterminés : exactitude de la +restitution, conformité de la méthode, légitimité du support, autorité +du maître, compatibilité avec le corpus admis. C'est dans ce passage +réglé entre savoir possible et savoir reconnu que se joue l'opération +archicratique proprement dite. L'important n'est donc pas seulement la +possession du contenu, mais la procédure par laquelle ce contenu devient +publiquement, institutionnellement et collectivement tenable comme vrai. -L’Académie de Platon, l’université médiévale, les maisons savantes sassanides, les madrasas ou les grandes institutions lettrées de transmission montrent, chacune à leur manière, cette opération. Le savoir n’y circule pas librement ; il passe par des formes d’habilitation, de hiérarchisation et de filtrage. Certains textes sont consacrés, d’autres marginalisés ; certains commentaires deviennent normatifs, d’autres sont retranchés ; certaines voix sont autorisées à interpréter, d’autres demeurent extérieures au champ légitime. L’archicration épistémique se loge donc dans cette articulation entre corpus, médiateurs, institutions et procédures de reconnaissance. +L'Académie de Platon, l'université médiévale, les maisons savantes +sassanides, les madrasas ou les grandes institutions lettrées de +transmission montrent, chacune à leur manière, cette opération. Le +savoir n'y circule pas librement ; il passe par des formes +d'habilitation, de hiérarchisation et de filtrage. Certains textes sont +consacrés, d'autres marginalisés ; certains commentaires deviennent +normatifs, d'autres sont retranchés ; certaines voix sont autorisées à +interpréter, d'autres demeurent extérieures au champ légitime. +L'archicration épistémique se loge donc dans cette articulation entre +corpus, médiateurs, institutions et procédures de reconnaissance. -Elle s’incarne aussi dans des opérateurs matériels concrets : manuels, tables, schémas, instruments, bibliothèques, dispositifs de classement. Ces formes ne sont pas secondaires. Les Éléments d’Euclide, les tables babyloniennes, les protocoles médicaux, les instruments astronomiques ou les topologies savantes des grandes bibliothèques montrent que la régulation passe aussi par des objets qui stabilisent les opérations intellectuelles et encadrent les parcours de pensée. Chaque format contraint ; chaque outil oriente ; chaque classification distribue silencieusement le champ du possible cognitif. +Elle s'incarne aussi dans des opérateurs matériels concrets : manuels, +tables, schémas, instruments, bibliothèques, dispositifs de classement. +Ces formes ne sont pas secondaires. Les Éléments d'Euclide, les tables +babyloniennes, les protocoles médicaux, les instruments astronomiques ou +les topologies savantes des grandes bibliothèques montrent que la +régulation passe aussi par des objets qui stabilisent les opérations +intellectuelles et encadrent les parcours de pensée. Chaque format +contraint ; chaque outil oriente ; chaque classification distribue +silencieusement le champ du possible cognitif. -Comme tout méta-régime, le régime épistémique connaît cependant ses fragilités. Il se déséquilibre lorsque les corpus deviennent trop massifs pour rester lisibles, lorsque la prolifération des commentaires dissout la cohérence du système, lorsque les médiateurs autorisés perdent leur crédibilité, ou encore lorsque des contre-régimes cognitifs concurrents — ésotériques, théologiques, expérimentaux, autodidactes — contestent l’unité du savoir reconnu. Il peut également être subordonné à d’autres régimes, lorsqu’un cadre théologique ou politique impose ses propres conditions de validation à l’intérieur du champ savant. +Comme tout méta-régime, le régime épistémique connaît cependant ses +fragilités. Il se déséquilibre lorsque les corpus deviennent trop +massifs pour rester lisibles, lorsque la prolifération des commentaires +dissout la cohérence du système, lorsque les médiateurs autorisés +perdent leur crédibilité, ou encore lorsque des contre-régimes cognitifs +concurrents — ésotériques, théologiques, expérimentaux, autodidactes — contestent l'unité du savoir reconnu. Il peut également être +subordonné à d'autres régimes, lorsqu'un cadre théologique ou politique +impose ses propres conditions de validation à l'intérieur du champ +savant. -Ces crises ne suppriment pas le régime épistémique ; elles en révèlent les conditions de possibilité. Pour qu’il régule effectivement, il faut que le savoir demeure à la fois formalisable, transmissible, validable et socialement reconnu. Lorsqu’un de ces termes se défait, l’intelligibilité commune se fragmente et la co-viabilité cognitive devient incertaine. Le savoir ne cesse pas d’exister, mais il perd sa capacité à faire ordre. +Ces crises ne suppriment pas le régime épistémique ; elles en révèlent +les conditions de possibilité. Pour qu'il régule effectivement, il faut +que le savoir demeure à la fois formalisable, transmissible, validable +et socialement reconnu. Lorsqu'un de ces termes se défait, +l'intelligibilité commune se fragmente et la co-viabilité cognitive +devient incertaine. Le savoir ne cesse pas d'exister, mais il perd sa +capacité à faire ordre. -Le méta-régime épistémique occupe ainsi une place singulière dans la typologie archicratique. Ni prescriptif comme le scripturo-normatif, ni narratif comme l’historiographique, ni transcendant comme le théologique, il repose sur une structure cognitive partageable, opératoire et reproductible. Il ne commande pas : il formalise. Il ne raconte pas : il classe. Il ne révèle pas : il démontre. Il produit une obligation sans commandement explicite, en stabilisant les conditions mêmes du pensable recevable. +Le méta-régime épistémique occupe ainsi une place singulière dans la +typologie archicratique. Ni prescriptif comme le scripturo-normatif, ni +narratif comme l'historiographique, ni transcendant comme le +théologique, il repose sur une structure cognitive partageable, +opératoire et reproductible. Il ne commande pas : il formalise. Il ne +raconte pas : il classe. Il ne révèle pas : il démontre. Il produit une +obligation sans commandement explicite, en stabilisant les conditions +mêmes du pensable recevable. -La co-viabilité qu’il instaure n’est donc ni d’abord morale, ni dynastique, ni cosmologique : elle est cognitive. Une société tient aussi parce qu’elle partage des formats de preuve, des procédures de validation, des découpages du réel et des langages d’intelligibilité communs. +La co-viabilité qu'il instaure n'est donc ni d'abord morale, ni +dynastique, ni cosmologique : elle est cognitive. Une société tient +aussi parce qu'elle partage des formats de preuve, des procédures de +validation, des découpages du réel et des langages d'intelligibilité +communs. -Ce méta-régime ne présuppose nullement l’homogénéité des sciences. Les formats de preuve, les modalités d’objectivation, les régimes de validation et les scènes de controverse varient fortement selon les domaines, les époques et les institutions. Ce qui les rend ici comparables n’est donc pas l’identité de leurs méthodes, mais le fait que la co-viabilité y passe prioritairement par la production, l’épreuve et la stabilisation réglée d’énoncés recevables comme vrais. +Ce méta-régime ne présuppose nullement l'homogénéité des sciences. Les +formats de preuve, les modalités d'objectivation, les régimes de +validation et les scènes de controverse varient fortement selon les +domaines, les époques et les institutions. Ce qui les rend ici +comparables n'est donc pas l'identité de leurs méthodes, mais le fait +que la co-viabilité y passe prioritairement par la production, l'épreuve +et la stabilisation réglée d'énoncés recevables comme vrais. -Sous ce rapport, la raison n’est jamais neutre : elle est elle-même un dispositif de pouvoir, une forme d’organisation collective des conditions du vrai. Que la vérité soit historiquement produite, validée et socialement distribuée ne signifie pas qu’elle se réduise à un simple effet de pouvoir. Cela signifie surtout qu’aucun accès au vrai n’opère sans médiations, sans scènes d’épreuve, sans instruments, sans protocoles et sans communautés capables d’en soutenir ou d’en contester la validité. Le régime épistémique ne confond donc pas vérité et pouvoir ; il montre plutôt que la vérité, pour réguler, doit passer par des formes instituées d’objectivation, de critique et de recevabilité. En cela, l’archicration épistémique constitue une forme pleinement autonome de régulation. +Sous ce rapport, la raison n'est jamais neutre : elle est elle-même un +dispositif de pouvoir, une forme d'organisation collective des +conditions du vrai. Que la vérité soit historiquement produite, validée +et socialement distribuée ne signifie pas qu'elle se réduise à un simple +effet de pouvoir. Cela signifie surtout qu'aucun accès au vrai n'opère +sans médiations, sans scènes d'épreuve, sans instruments, sans +protocoles et sans communautés capables d'en soutenir ou d'en contester +la validité. Le régime épistémique ne confond donc pas vérité et pouvoir +; il montre plutôt que la vérité, pour réguler, doit passer par des +formes instituées d'objectivation, de critique et de recevabilité. En +cela, l'archicration épistémique constitue une forme pleinement autonome +de régulation. -Plus profondément encore, ce méta-régime montre que l’intelligibilité n’est ni immédiatement disponible ni purement héritée : elle doit être construite, éprouvée, objectivée et stabilisée dans des procédures de validation explicites. Penser selon un schème, démontrer selon une méthode, classer selon une nomenclature, interpréter selon un protocole, ce n’est jamais uniquement connaître ; c’est aussi déjà participer à une forme de mise en ordre du monde commun. +Plus profondément encore, ce méta-régime montre que l'intelligibilité +n'est ni immédiatement disponible ni purement héritée : elle doit être +construite, éprouvée, objectivée et stabilisée dans des procédures de +validation explicites. Penser selon un schème, démontrer selon une +méthode, classer selon une nomenclature, interpréter selon un protocole, +ce n'est jamais uniquement connaître ; c'est aussi déjà participer à une +forme de mise en ordre du monde commun. -L’archicration épistémique ne se réduit pourtant pas à la seule discussion savante. Elle n’existe au sens fort que lorsque les énoncés, les preuves, les mesures, les instruments et les protocoles peuvent être exposés à une épreuve réelle, rendus méthodiquement opposables et transformés à l’issue de cette mise à l’épreuve. Là où la validation se ferme sur elle-même, où la critique devient fictive ou où la preuve ne peut plus être reprise, la scène épistémique se dégrade en autorité académique sans archicration effective. +L'archicration épistémique ne se réduit pourtant pas à la seule +discussion savante. Elle n'existe au sens fort que lorsque les énoncés, +les preuves, les mesures, les instruments et les protocoles peuvent être +exposés à une épreuve réelle, rendus méthodiquement opposables et +transformés à l'issue de cette mise à l'épreuve. Là où la validation se +ferme sur elle-même, où la critique devient fictive ou où la preuve ne +peut plus être reprise, la scène épistémique se dégrade en autorité +académique sans archicration effective. -C’est pourquoi l’archicration épistémique excède largement les seules sociétés savantes antiques ou médiévales. Elle ouvre une logique de très longue durée, que les mondes modernes et contemporains n’ont cessé d’intensifier : celle d’un ordre qui ne s’autorise plus d’abord par le récit, la révélation ou le lignage, mais par la validation standardisée des procédures, des preuves et des compétences. À chaque fois, l’obligation n’est plus principalement dite, racontée ni révélée ; elle est prouvée, validée, référée, calculée. La maîtrise des procédures d’établissement du vrai devient ainsi l’un des principes les plus puissants de légitimation de l’ordre. +C'est pourquoi l'archicration épistémique excède largement les seules +sociétés savantes antiques ou médiévales. Elle ouvre une logique de très +longue durée, que les mondes modernes et contemporains n'ont cessé +d'intensifier : celle d'un ordre qui ne s'autorise plus d'abord par le +récit, la révélation ou le lignage, mais par la validation standardisée +des procédures, des preuves et des compétences. À chaque fois, +l'obligation n'est plus principalement dite, racontée ni révélée ; elle +est prouvée, validée, référée, calculée. La maîtrise des procédures +d'établissement du vrai devient ainsi l'un des principes les plus +puissants de légitimation de l'ordre. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe. -La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : non plus celui de l’encodage savant du savoir, mais celui de l’efficacité régulatrice des formes sensibles. Avec l’archicration esthético-symbolique, l’ordre ne sera plus d’abord démontré ni classé : il sera configuré par la forme, la matière, la cadence et le style. +La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : non +plus celui de l'encodage savant du savoir, mais celui de l'efficacité +régulatrice des formes sensibles. Avec l'archicration +esthético-symbolique, l'ordre ne sera plus d'abord démontré ni classé : +il sera configuré par la forme, la matière, la cadence et le style. ### 2.2.9 — *Archicrations esthético-symboliques* -Il existe des méta-régimes où le pouvoir ne dit presque rien, ne démontre presque rien, et ne se définit pas d’abord par la narration comme principe de validité, mais agit pourtant avec force. Les formes qu’il mobilise peuvent être narratives, scéniques ou figuratives ; leur efficacité ne tient cependant pas principalement à l’enchaînement d’un récit, mais à la configuration sensible qu’elles instaurent lorsqu’elle devient instituée, codifiée, répétée et collectivement reconnaissable. Nous désignons ici par archicration esthético-symbolique ce méta-régime dans lequel l’ordre se stabilise à travers l’agencement réglé du visible, du sonore, du gestuel, du spatial ou du tactile. +Il existe des méta-régimes où le pouvoir ne dit presque rien, ne +démontre presque rien, et ne se définit pas d'abord par la narration +comme principe de validité, mais agit pourtant avec force. Les formes +qu'il mobilise peuvent être narratives, scéniques ou figuratives ; leur +efficacité ne tient cependant pas principalement à l'enchaînement d'un +récit, mais à la configuration sensible qu'elles instaurent lorsqu'elle +devient instituée, codifiée, répétée et collectivement reconnaissable. +Nous désignons ici par archicration esthético-symbolique ce méta-régime +dans lequel l'ordre se stabilise à travers l'agencement réglé du +visible, du sonore, du gestuel, du spatial ou du tactile. -Ce méta-régime engage donc d’abord une politique de la perception ; mais ses effets ne sont pas seulement perceptifs au sens étroit. Les formes qu’il stabilise orientent aussi des tonalités affectives, des dispositions émotionnelles et des seuils de supportabilité, sans que l’émotion constitue pour autant son principe unique de validité. Ce qui est premier ici n’est pas l’affect isolé, mais le champ sensible au sein duquel certaines émotions, certaines attitudes et certaines manières d’éprouver deviennent plus probables, plus recevables ou plus dissonantes. +Ce méta-régime engage donc d'abord une politique de la perception ; mais +ses effets ne sont pas seulement perceptifs au sens étroit. Les formes +qu'il stabilise orientent aussi des tonalités affectives, des +dispositions émotionnelles et des seuils de supportabilité, sans que +l'émotion constitue pour autant son principe unique de validité. Ce qui +est premier ici n'est pas l'affect isolé, mais le champ sensible au sein +duquel certaines émotions, certaines attitudes et certaines manières +d'éprouver deviennent plus probables, plus recevables ou plus +dissonantes. -L’arcalité propre à ce régime réside dans la capacité de certaines formes à s’imposer comme matrices immédiates de convenance. Il ne s’agit pas d’ornement au sens faible, mais de configurations sensibles qui orientent les conduites sans les prescrire, hiérarchisent sans commandement explicite et rendent certaines apparences spontanément recevables tandis que d’autres deviennent déplacées, discordantes ou indignes. La norme n’y descend ni d’une transcendance, ni d’un code, ni d’un récit d’origine : elle émerge de la stabilisation partagée d’un certain ordre perceptif. +L'arcalité propre à ce régime réside dans la capacité de certaines +formes à s'imposer comme matrices immédiates de convenance. Il ne s'agit +pas d'ornement au sens faible, mais de configurations sensibles qui +orientent les conduites sans les prescrire, hiérarchisent sans +commandement explicite et rendent certaines apparences spontanément +recevables tandis que d'autres deviennent déplacées, discordantes ou +indignes. La norme n'y descend ni d'une transcendance, ni d'un code, ni +d'un récit d'origine : elle émerge de la stabilisation partagée d'un +certain ordre perceptif. -Ce point est central : l’arcalité ne repose pas ici sur un principe explicite, mais sur une économie implicite de la perception. Ce qui est tenu pour valide ne procède pas d’une justification préalable, mais d’une familiarité stabilisée avec certaines formes. L’évidence ne vient pas après l’interprétation ; elle en conditionne la possibilité même. Le monde apparaît ainsi déjà configuré selon des lignes de convenance qui orientent en amont ce qui pourra être perçu, distingué ou jugé. +Ce point est central : l'arcalité ne repose pas ici sur un principe +explicite, mais sur une économie implicite de la perception. Ce qui est +tenu pour valide ne procède pas d'une justification préalable, mais +d'une familiarité stabilisée avec certaines formes. L'évidence ne vient +pas après l'interprétation ; elle en conditionne la possibilité même. Le +monde apparaît ainsi déjà configuré selon des lignes de convenance qui +orientent en amont ce qui pourra être perçu, distingué ou jugé. -Cette arcalité se laisse saisir dans plusieurs types de dispositifs. Des habitats proto-urbains comme ceux de Cucuteni-Trypillia ou de la vallée de l’Indus montrent comment la répétition de gabarits, d’orientations, de modules et de tracés peut produire une régularité collective sans passer par une monumentalité explicite ni par un discours normatif. De même, les textiles à motifs codifiés, les décors muraux récurrents, les postures ritualisées ou les séquences chorégraphiques stabilisées ne valent pas seulement comme expressions culturelles : ils fixent des seuils de convenance, distribuent des appartenances et rendent perceptibles les écarts admissibles. +Cette arcalité se laisse saisir dans plusieurs types de dispositifs. Des +habitats proto-urbains comme ceux de Cucuteni-Trypillia ou de la vallée +de l'Indus montrent comment la répétition de gabarits, d'orientations, +de modules et de tracés peut produire une régularité collective sans +passer par une monumentalité explicite ni par un discours normatif. De +même, les textiles à motifs codifiés, les décors muraux récurrents, les +postures ritualisées ou les séquences chorégraphiques stabilisées ne +valent pas seulement comme expressions culturelles : ils fixent des +seuils de convenance, distribuent des appartenances et rendent +perceptibles les écarts admissibles. -Ce régime s’incarne ainsi dans des motifs, des rythmes, des contrastes, des textures, des volumes, des scansions et des placements. Ce qui importe n’est pas le sens caché de chaque forme, mais sa capacité à produire de l’évidence partagée. Le style, ici, ne renvoie ni à une préférence individuelle ni à un supplément décoratif : il désigne une configuration devenue recevable par répétition, ajustement et reconnaissance. L’ordre n’y est pas dit ; il est montré. Et c’est précisément parce qu’il se présente sous la forme d’une convenance sensible qu’il peut opérer avec une telle profondeur, en amont même de l’argument, de la croyance ou de la preuve. +Ce régime s'incarne ainsi dans des motifs, des rythmes, des contrastes, +des textures, des volumes, des scansions et des placements. Ce qui +importe n'est pas le sens caché de chaque forme, mais sa capacité à +produire de l'évidence partagée. Le style, ici, ne renvoie ni à une +préférence individuelle ni à un supplément décoratif : il désigne une +configuration devenue recevable par répétition, ajustement et +reconnaissance. L'ordre n'y est pas dit ; il est montré. Et c'est +précisément parce qu'il se présente sous la forme d'une convenance +sensible qu'il peut opérer avec une telle profondeur, en amont même de +l'argument, de la croyance ou de la preuve. -L’arcalité esthético-symbolique ne doit donc pas être reléguée au rang d’accompagnement secondaire d’autres méta-régimes. Le sensible n’est jamais absent des autres formes de co-viabilité ; mais il ne devient archicratique au sens propre que lorsqu’il constitue la condition principale de recevabilité, c’est-à-dire lorsque la conformité ou la dissonance perceptive précède, oriente ou neutralise les formes discursives de validation. En ce sens, l’archicration esthético-symbolique constitue une modalité autonome de mise en ordre : non par prescription, non par narration, non par démonstration, mais par institution d’un champ perceptif partagé. +L'arcalité esthético-symbolique ne doit donc pas être reléguée au rang +d'accompagnement secondaire d'autres méta-régimes. Le sensible n'est +jamais absent des autres formes de co-viabilité ; mais il ne devient +archicratique au sens propre que lorsqu'il constitue la condition +principale de recevabilité, c'est-à-dire lorsque la conformité ou la +dissonance perceptive précède, oriente ou neutralise les formes +discursives de validation. En ce sens, l'archicration +esthético-symbolique constitue une modalité autonome de mise en ordre : +non par prescription, non par narration, non par démonstration, mais par +institution d'un champ perceptif partagé. -Sa singularité apparaît avec netteté dès qu’on la compare aux autres méta-régimes. Contrairement au théologique, elle n’oblige pas par la source d’un énoncé révélé ; Contrairement à l’historiographique, elle ne stabilise pas principalement la continuité par la narration du passé ; contrairement à l’épistémique, elle ne formalise pas d’abord le réel par démonstration ou classification. Elle opère sur un autre plan : celui de l’évidence sensible, où l’ordre n’a pas besoin d’être d’abord cru, prouvé ou narrativement articulé pour commencer à agir. Les récits qu’elle peut mobiliser n’y valent pas d’abord comme chaînes de justification, mais comme compositions sensibles capables de configurer immédiatement la perception du recevable. +Sa singularité apparaît avec netteté dès qu'on la compare aux autres +méta-régimes. Contrairement au théologique, elle n'oblige pas par la +source d'un énoncé révélé ; Contrairement à l'historiographique, elle ne +stabilise pas principalement la continuité par la narration du passé ; +contrairement à l'épistémique, elle ne formalise pas d'abord le réel par +démonstration ou classification. Elle opère sur un autre plan : celui de +l'évidence sensible, où l'ordre n'a pas besoin d'être d'abord cru, +prouvé ou narrativement articulé pour commencer à agir. Les récits +qu'elle peut mobiliser n'y valent pas d'abord comme chaînes de +justification, mais comme compositions sensibles capables de configurer +immédiatement la perception du recevable. -La cratialité esthético-symbolique s’exerce dans la capacité différentielle à produire, stabiliser et distribuer les formes recevables. L’ordre ne s’y impose pas par décret, mais par la maîtrise des codes du visible, du gestuel, du sonore ou du spatial. Ceux qui savent composer les motifs légitimes, régler les intensités, disposer les corps, rythmer les apparitions ou configurer les espaces détiennent une puissance spécifique : non celle de commander explicitement, mais celle de faire exister le monde sous une forme tenue pour convenable. +La cratialité esthético-symbolique s'exerce dans la capacité +différentielle à produire, stabiliser et distribuer les formes +recevables. L'ordre ne s'y impose pas par décret, mais par la maîtrise +des codes du visible, du gestuel, du sonore ou du spatial. Ceux qui +savent composer les motifs légitimes, régler les intensités, disposer +les corps, rythmer les apparitions ou configurer les espaces détiennent +une puissance spécifique : non celle de commander explicitement, mais +celle de faire exister le monde sous une forme tenue pour convenable. -Cette puissance peut être observée dans des contextes très divers. Les décors muraux de Çatal Höyük, les fresques de Théra, certaines différenciations architecturales de l’âge du fer européen, les motifs céramiques de Lapita ou les dispositifs ornementaux et vestimentaires de plusieurs mondes africains subsahariens montrent tous une même logique : la forme n’y vaut pas seulement comme embellissement, mais comme opérateur de distinction, de hiérarchisation et d’ajustement collectif. L’autorité revient alors à ceux qui maîtrisent la syntaxe du perceptible, qu’il s’agisse de décorateurs, d’artisans, d’ordonnateurs de cérémonie, de compositeurs de gestes ou de gardiens d’un répertoire formel reconnu. +Cette puissance peut être observée dans des contextes très divers. Les +décors muraux de Çatal Höyük, les fresques de Théra, certaines +différenciations architecturales de l'âge du fer européen, les motifs +céramiques de Lapita ou les dispositifs ornementaux et vestimentaires de +plusieurs mondes africains subsahariens montrent tous une même logique : +la forme n'y vaut pas seulement comme embellissement, mais comme +opérateur de distinction, de hiérarchisation et d'ajustement collectif. +L'autorité revient alors à ceux qui maîtrisent la syntaxe du +perceptible, qu'il s'agisse de décorateurs, d'artisans, d'ordonnateurs +de cérémonie, de compositeurs de gestes ou de gardiens d'un répertoire +formel reconnu. -Le style doit ici être entendu dans un sens fort. Il ne désigne ni une subjectivité expressive ni une simple signature, mais une convenance stabilisée. Styliser, dans ce cadre, c’est rendre une forme admissible, désirable ou honorable par le réglage des contrastes, des rythmes, des textures et des proportions. La cratialité esthético-symbolique réside précisément dans cette compétence à produire du recevable sans avoir à l’énoncer. Elle repose sur une distribution inégale du pouvoir de configurer les apparences, et donc d’orienter silencieusement ce qui pourra être reconnu comme digne, correct ou légitime. +Le style doit ici être entendu dans un sens fort. Il ne désigne ni une +subjectivité expressive ni une simple signature, mais une convenance +stabilisée. Styliser, dans ce cadre, c'est rendre une forme admissible, +désirable ou honorable par le réglage des contrastes, des rythmes, des +textures et des proportions. La cratialité esthético-symbolique réside +précisément dans cette compétence à produire du recevable sans avoir à +l'énoncer. Elle repose sur une distribution inégale du pouvoir de +configurer les apparences, et donc d'orienter silencieusement ce qui +pourra être reconnu comme digne, correct ou légitime. -Cette asymétrie n’est pas toujours visible comme telle, précisément parce qu’elle opère en deçà de l’énonciation. Elle ne se manifeste pas nécessairement par des interdits explicites, mais par une capacité différenciée à faire exister certaines formes plutôt que d’autres. Le pouvoir ne réside pas tant dans l’imposition d’un contenu que dans la maîtrise des conditions d’apparition : ce qui est montré, ce qui est répété, ce qui est rendu saillant finit par s’imposer comme allant de soi, sans qu’il soit nécessaire d’en formuler la règle. +Cette asymétrie n'est pas toujours visible comme telle, précisément +parce qu'elle opère en deçà de l'énonciation. Elle ne se manifeste pas +nécessairement par des interdits explicites, mais par une capacité +différenciée à faire exister certaines formes plutôt que d'autres. Le +pouvoir ne réside pas tant dans l'imposition d'un contenu que dans la +maîtrise des conditions d'apparition : ce qui est montré, ce qui est +répété, ce qui est rendu saillant finit par s'imposer comme allant de +soi, sans qu'il soit nécessaire d'en formuler la règle. -L’archicration esthético-symbolique apparaît lorsque cette puissance formelle devient objet de réglage explicite, de sélection, de canalisation ou d’exclusion. Elle ne réside plus seulement dans l’existence d’un style ou dans la compétence de ceux qui le maîtrisent, mais dans les scènes où une collectivité détermine ce qui pourra paraître, circuler et faire autorité dans l’ordre du sensible. L’archicration commence donc là où les formes recevables cessent d’aller de soi et doivent être reconduites, arbitrées ou défendues. +L'archicration esthético-symbolique apparaît lorsque cette puissance +formelle devient objet de réglage explicite, de sélection, de +canalisation ou d'exclusion. Elle ne réside plus seulement dans +l'existence d'un style ou dans la compétence de ceux qui le maîtrisent, +mais dans les scènes où une collectivité détermine ce qui pourra +paraître, circuler et faire autorité dans l'ordre du sensible. +L'archicration commence donc là où les formes recevables cessent d'aller +de soi et doivent être reconduites, arbitrées ou défendues. -Cette opération peut prendre la forme d’une ritualisation du perceptible. Les dispositifs cérémoniels, les postures codifiées, les scansions sonores, les rythmes collectifs ou les mises en espace réglées ne transmettent pas seulement un contenu ; ils produisent une scène où l’accord sensible est rejoué comme condition de la tenue commune. Ce que Catherine Bell, Victor Turner ou Stanley Tambiah ont montré à propos des pratiques rituelles peut être repris ici dans une perspective archicratique : le rite agit comme appareil de configuration perceptive, en distribuant les intensités légitimes, en ordonnant les gestes recevables et en rendant immédiatement perceptible ce qui convient. +Cette opération peut prendre la forme d'une ritualisation du +perceptible. Les dispositifs cérémoniels, les postures codifiées, les +scansions sonores, les rythmes collectifs ou les mises en espace réglées +ne transmettent pas seulement un contenu ; ils produisent une scène où +l'accord sensible est rejoué comme condition de la tenue commune. Ce que +Catherine Bell, Victor Turner ou Stanley Tambiah ont montré à propos des +pratiques rituelles peut être repris ici dans une perspective +archicratique : le rite agit comme appareil de configuration perceptive, +en distribuant les intensités légitimes, en ordonnant les gestes +recevables et en rendant immédiatement perceptible ce qui convient. -Mais l’archicration esthético-symbolique se manifeste aussi dans le tri des formes admissibles. Elle devient particulièrement lisible lorsque certaines apparences sont consacrées tandis que d’autres sont rejetées comme déplacées, vulgaires, impures ou dangereuses. L’iconoclasme byzantin, les épurations stylistiques post-tridentines, ou encore certaines limitations figuratives dans les mondes islamiques montrent bien qu’il ne s’agit pas seulement de produire des formes, mais de gouverner les conditions mêmes de l’apparaître. L’archicration se loge alors dans cette capacité à sélectionner le visible légitime, à organiser le partage du sensible et à faire de la convenance formelle une condition de co-viabilité. +Mais l'archicration esthético-symbolique se manifeste aussi dans le tri +des formes admissibles. Elle devient particulièrement lisible lorsque +certaines apparences sont consacrées tandis que d'autres sont rejetées +comme déplacées, vulgaires, impures ou dangereuses. L'iconoclasme +byzantin, les épurations stylistiques post-tridentines, ou encore +certaines limitations figuratives dans les mondes islamiques montrent +bien qu'il ne s'agit pas seulement de produire des formes, mais de +gouverner les conditions mêmes de l'apparaître. L'archicration se loge +alors dans cette capacité à sélectionner le visible légitime, à +organiser le partage du sensible et à faire de la convenance formelle +une condition de co-viabilité. -C’est ici que le régime atteint son point le plus proprement archicratique : non lorsqu’une forme est simplement produite, mais lorsqu’elle devient enjeu de maintien collectif, c’est-à-dire lorsqu’il faut régler quelles apparitions soutiennent encore le monde commun et lesquelles l’exposent à la dissonance. L’archicration n’est donc pas la simple existence d’un style dominant ; elle est la scène, diffuse ou explicite, où se fixe la frontière entre le recevable et l’irrecevable dans l’ordre des formes. +C'est ici que le régime atteint son point le plus proprement +archicratique : non lorsqu'une forme est simplement produite, mais +lorsqu'elle devient enjeu de maintien collectif, c'est-à-dire lorsqu'il +faut régler quelles apparitions soutiennent encore le monde commun et +lesquelles l'exposent à la dissonance. L'archicration n'est donc pas la +simple existence d'un style dominant ; elle est la scène, diffuse ou +explicite, où se fixe la frontière entre le recevable et l'irrecevable +dans l'ordre des formes. -Comme tout méta-régime, l’archicration esthético-symbolique connaît ses fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque les codes formels perdent leur lisibilité, lorsque la répétition stylistique se fige en décor sans force, lorsque plusieurs grammaires sensibles concurrentes entrent en conflit, ou encore lorsque les formes dominantes deviennent l’objet d’une reprise ironique, critique ou parodique. Dans tous ces cas, ce ne sont pas nécessairement les motifs, les gestes ou les dispositifs qui disparaissent, mais leur capacité à produire une reconnaissance immédiate du convenable. +Comme tout méta-régime, l'archicration esthético-symbolique connaît ses +fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque les codes formels perdent leur +lisibilité, lorsque la répétition stylistique se fige en décor sans +force, lorsque plusieurs grammaires sensibles concurrentes entrent en +conflit, ou encore lorsque les formes dominantes deviennent l'objet +d'une reprise ironique, critique ou parodique. Dans tous ces cas, ce ne +sont pas nécessairement les motifs, les gestes ou les dispositifs qui +disparaissent, mais leur capacité à produire une reconnaissance +immédiate du convenable. -Ces crises peuvent prendre plusieurs figures. Il arrive que le régime s’épuise par saturation interne : surcharge ornementale, ritualisation vide, excès de codification. Il peut aussi être fragilisé par pluralisation perceptive, lorsque plusieurs styles ou plusieurs ordres du visible se disputent la légitimité sans qu’aucun ne s’impose durablement. Il peut enfin être déstabilisé par retournement critique, lorsque les codes mêmes du prestige, de la convenance ou de la majesté sont repris pour être moqués, renversés ou désacralisés. +Ces crises peuvent prendre plusieurs figures. Il arrive que le régime +s'épuise par saturation interne : surcharge ornementale, ritualisation +vide, excès de codification. Il peut aussi être fragilisé par +pluralisation perceptive, lorsque plusieurs styles ou plusieurs ordres +du visible se disputent la légitimité sans qu'aucun ne s'impose +durablement. Il peut enfin être déstabilisé par retournement critique, +lorsque les codes mêmes du prestige, de la convenance ou de la majesté +sont repris pour être moqués, renversés ou désacralisés. -Mais ces désajustements n’abolissent pas le régime ; ils en révèlent les conditions d’efficacité. Pour qu’une archicration esthético-symbolique régule effectivement, il faut que les formes demeurent lisibles, que leur hiérarchie reste partageable, et que leur reprise continue d’orienter les perceptions sans devoir constamment se justifier. Lorsque cette triple condition se défait, le style persiste peut-être, mais il cesse de faire ordre. Le sensible ne disparaît pas ; il perd simplement sa puissance immédiate de co-viabilité. +Mais ces désajustements n'abolissent pas le régime ; ils en révèlent les +conditions d'efficacité. Pour qu'une archicration esthético-symbolique +régule effectivement, il faut que les formes demeurent lisibles, que +leur hiérarchie reste partageable, et que leur reprise continue +d'orienter les perceptions sans devoir constamment se justifier. Lorsque +cette triple condition se défait, le style persiste peut-être, mais il +cesse de faire ordre. Le sensible ne disparaît pas ; il perd simplement +sa puissance immédiate de co-viabilité. -Dans certaines configurations plus récentes, cette dynamique atteint un degré réflexif inédit, lorsque des collectifs entreprennent de reconfigurer explicitement les formes du visible afin de transformer les conditions mêmes du recevable. Certains mouvements artistiques — qu’il s’agisse des avant-gardes européennes du début du XXe siècle ou de formes plus situées de réélaboration stylistique — ne se contentent plus de produire des œuvres, mais interviennent sur les seuils de lisibilité du monde sensible lui-même. Ils déplacent les critères de convenance, déstabilisent les hiérarchies perceptives, introduisent des formes jusque-là disqualifiées dans l’espace du recevable. Dans ces moments, l’esthético-symbolique cesse d’opérer à bas bruit : il devient explicitement conflictuel. Ce ne sont plus seulement les formes qui régulent les conduites, mais la régulation des formes elle-même qui devient objet de lutte, révélant en creux la dimension archicratique du style comme opérateur de co-viabilité. +Dans certaines configurations plus récentes, cette dynamique atteint un +degré réflexif inédit, lorsque des collectifs entreprennent de +reconfigurer explicitement les formes du visible afin de transformer les +conditions mêmes du recevable. Certains mouvements artistiques — qu'il +s'agisse des avant-gardes européennes du début du XXe siècle ou de +formes plus situées de réélaboration stylistique — ne se contentent +plus de produire des œuvres, mais interviennent sur les seuils de +lisibilité du monde sensible lui-même. Ils déplacent les critères de +convenance, déstabilisent les hiérarchies perceptives, introduisent des +formes jusque-là disqualifiées dans l'espace du recevable. Dans ces +moments, l'esthético-symbolique cesse d'opérer à bas bruit : il devient +explicitement conflictuel. Ce ne sont plus seulement les formes qui +régulent les conduites, mais la régulation des formes elle-même qui +devient objet de lutte, révélant en creux la dimension archicratique du +style comme opérateur de co-viabilité. -Le méta-régime esthético-symbolique se distingue par une propriété singulière : il n’organise pas l’ordre en le disant, en le racontant ou en le démontrant, mais en le rendant immédiatement perceptible. Là où d’autres régimes produisent de l’obligation par l’énoncé, la mémoire ou la preuve, celui-ci la fait naître d’un accord sensible, d’une reconnaissance tacite de ce qui apparaît comme convenable. +Le méta-régime esthético-symbolique se distingue par une propriété +singulière : il n'organise pas l'ordre en le disant, en le racontant ou +en le démontrant, mais en le rendant immédiatement perceptible. Là où +d'autres régimes produisent de l'obligation par l'énoncé, la mémoire ou +la preuve, celui-ci la fait naître d'un accord sensible, d'une +reconnaissance tacite de ce qui apparaît comme convenable. -Sa force tient à cette immanence : l’ordre n’y est pas référé à un principe extérieur, mais inscrit dans les formes mêmes par lesquelles le monde se donne à voir, à entendre ou à éprouver. Motifs, rythmes, postures, textures, agencements spatiaux ou scénographies constituent autant de matrices par lesquelles une collectivité stabilise ce qu’elle peut reconnaître comme admissible. La co-viabilité ne repose plus ici sur une croyance partagée ou sur une norme explicite, mais sur une compatibilité des perceptions et des affects, rendue possible par la régulation du sensible. +Sa force tient à cette immanence : l'ordre n'y est pas référé à un +principe extérieur, mais inscrit dans les formes mêmes par lesquelles le +monde se donne à voir, à entendre ou à éprouver. Motifs, rythmes, +postures, textures, agencements spatiaux ou scénographies constituent +autant de matrices par lesquelles une collectivité stabilise ce qu'elle +peut reconnaître comme admissible. La co-viabilité ne repose plus ici +sur une croyance partagée ou sur une norme explicite, mais sur une +compatibilité des perceptions et des affects, rendue possible par la +régulation du sensible. -L’archicration esthético-symbolique apparaît ainsi comme une politique implicite de la perception. Elle ne commande pas les conduites ; elle configure les conditions dans lesquelles certaines conduites apparaissent immédiatement appropriées dans un cadre perceptif donné, tandis que d’autres y deviennent difficilement formulables, recevables ou soutenables sans justification supplémentaire. Elle ne produit pas une vérité à laquelle il faudrait adhérer, mais un monde dans lequel il devient naturel de s’ajuster. +L'archicration esthético-symbolique apparaît ainsi comme une politique +implicite de la perception. Elle ne commande pas les conduites ; elle +configure les conditions dans lesquelles certaines conduites +apparaissent immédiatement appropriées dans un cadre perceptif donné, +tandis que d'autres y deviennent difficilement formulables, recevables +ou soutenables sans justification supplémentaire. Elle ne produit pas +une vérité à laquelle il faudrait adhérer, mais un monde dans lequel il +devient naturel de s'ajuster. -Dans l’économie générale de l’archicratie, ce méta-régime occupe donc une position irréductible. Il ne se substitue pas aux autres, mais les accompagne, les renforce ou les infléchit en agissant en amont du langage et de la justification. Il constitue la couche perceptive à partir de laquelle d’autres formes de régulation peuvent ensuite se déployer. +Dans l'économie générale de l'archicratie, ce méta-régime occupe donc +une position irréductible. Il ne se substitue pas aux autres, mais les +accompagne, les renforce ou les infléchit en agissant en amont du +langage et de la justification. Il constitue la couche perceptive à +partir de laquelle d'autres formes de régulation peuvent ensuite se +déployer. -C’est pourquoi l’archicration esthético-symbolique doit être comprise comme une modalité autonome de mise en ordre : non par prescription, non par narration, non par démonstration, mais par institution d’un régime de perception partagé. Elle ne dit pas ce qui doit être ; elle fait en sorte que certaines formes d’être apparaissent comme allant de soi. Elle n’impose donc pas directement des énoncés ; elle configure les conditions dans lesquelles certains énoncés, certaines postures, certaines émotions et certaines conduites pourront ensuite apparaître comme évidents, plausibles ou acceptables. +C'est pourquoi l'archicration esthético-symbolique doit être comprise +comme une modalité autonome de mise en ordre : non par prescription, non +par narration, non par démonstration, mais par institution d'un régime +de perception partagé. Elle ne dit pas ce qui doit être ; elle fait en +sorte que certaines formes d'être apparaissent comme allant de soi. Elle +n'impose donc pas directement des énoncés ; elle configure les +conditions dans lesquelles certains énoncés, certaines postures, +certaines émotions et certaines conduites pourront ensuite apparaître +comme évidents, plausibles ou acceptables. -En ce sens, l’archicration esthético-symbolique engage une dimension particulièrement profonde de la co-viabilité : non plus seulement la coordination des actions ou l’accord des croyances, mais l’ajustement des perceptions elles-mêmes. Elle opère au niveau où le monde devient immédiatement habitable ou non, acceptable ou dissonant, familier ou étranger. C’est pourquoi elle peut être à la fois discrète dans ses manifestations et décisive dans ses effets : elle ne transforme pas seulement ce que les sujets font ou pensent, mais la manière même dont ils éprouvent ce qui leur est donné. +En ce sens, l'archicration esthético-symbolique engage une dimension +particulièrement profonde de la co-viabilité : non plus seulement la +coordination des actions ou l'accord des croyances, mais l'ajustement +des perceptions elles-mêmes. Elle opère au niveau où le monde devient +immédiatement habitable ou non, acceptable ou dissonant, familier ou +étranger. C'est pourquoi elle peut être à la fois discrète dans ses +manifestations et décisive dans ses effets : elle ne transforme pas +seulement ce que les sujets font ou pensent, mais la manière même dont +ils éprouvent ce qui leur est donné. -En cela, ce régime rappelle qu’une société ne tient pas seulement par ce qu’elle croit vrai, par ce qu’elle déclare juste ou par ce qu’elle sait démontrer, mais aussi par ce qu’elle parvient à rendre immédiatement supportable, harmonieux et reconnaissable à travers ses formes. Il existe donc une gouvernementalité du sensible, discrète mais décisive, dans laquelle la stabilité d’un monde dépend de la tenue perceptive de ses apparences. C’est cette profondeur infra-discursive de la régulation que l’archicration esthético-symbolique rend ici particulièrement lisible. +En cela, ce régime rappelle qu'une société ne tient pas seulement par ce +qu'elle croit vrai, par ce qu'elle déclare juste ou par ce qu'elle sait +démontrer, mais aussi par ce qu'elle parvient à rendre immédiatement +supportable, harmonieux et reconnaissable à travers ses formes. Il +existe donc une gouvernementalité du sensible, discrète mais décisive, +dans laquelle la stabilité d'un monde dépend de la tenue perceptive de +ses apparences. C'est cette profondeur infra-discursive de la régulation +que l'archicration esthético-symbolique rend ici particulièrement +lisible. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe. -La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : celui dans lequel l’obligation commune ne se stabilise ni par la forme sensible, ni par la mémoire, ni par le savoir, mais par l’édiction, la contestation et la révision publiques de normes générales au sein d’un espace politique institué. Avec l’archicration normativo-politique, l’ordre ne sera plus d’abord configuré par le sensible, mais exposé à la contradiction réglée du commun. +La sous-section suivante portera sur un autre régime archicratique : +celui dans lequel l'obligation commune ne se stabilise ni par la forme +sensible, ni par la mémoire, ni par le savoir, mais par l'édiction, la +contestation et la révision publiques de normes générales au sein d'un +espace politique institué. Avec l'archicration normativo-politique, +l'ordre ne sera plus d'abord configuré par le sensible, mais exposé à la +contradiction réglée du commun. ### 2.2.10 — *Archicrations normativo-politiques* -Il est des formes de régulation dans lesquelles la co-viabilité ne repose ni sur la mémoire incorporée, ni sur l’autorité sacrée, ni sur la technicité des procédures, ni sur la preuve savante, mais sur une capacité proprement politique à produire, exposer, contester et réviser publiquement l’obligation commune. Nous désignons ici par *archicration normativo-politique* le méta-régime dans lequel une collectivité se donne des normes générales opposables, dans un cadre politique institué de décision et d’imputabilité, tout en reconnaissant la légitimité procédurale de leur mise en débat. +Il est des formes de régulation dans lesquelles la co-viabilité ne +repose ni sur la mémoire incorporée, ni sur l'autorité sacrée, ni sur la +technicité des procédures, ni sur la preuve savante, mais sur une +capacité proprement politique à produire, exposer, contester et réviser +publiquement l'obligation commune. Nous désignons ici par *archicration +normativo-politique* le méta-régime dans lequel une collectivité se +donne des normes générales opposables, dans un cadre politique institué +de décision et d'imputabilité, tout en reconnaissant la légitimité +procédurale de leur mise en débat. -Ce qui singularise ce régime n’est donc ni l’existence d’un texte, ni la présence d’une autorité gouvernante, ni même la formulation explicite d’une règle. Son trait distinctif réside dans l’articulation de trois éléments : une norme générale adressée au corps politique tout entier ; une instance profane habilitée à l’énoncer ; une scène réglée où cette norme peut être contestée, amendée, suspendue ou reformulée. La règle ne vaut pas ici principalement parce qu’elle descend d’un principe supérieur, reproduit une tradition ou résulte d’une démonstration ; elle vaut parce qu’elle est publiquement formulée comme obligation commune dans un espace institué de contradiction. +Ce qui singularise ce régime n'est donc ni l'existence d'un texte, ni la +présence d'une autorité gouvernante, ni même la formulation explicite +d'une règle. Son trait distinctif réside dans l'articulation de trois +éléments : une norme générale adressée au corps politique tout entier ; +une instance profane habilitée à l'énoncer ; une scène réglée où cette +norme peut être contestée, amendée, suspendue ou reformulée. La règle ne +vaut pas ici principalement parce qu'elle descend d'un principe +supérieur, reproduit une tradition ou résulte d'une démonstration ; elle +vaut parce qu'elle est publiquement formulée comme obligation commune +dans un espace institué de contradiction. -Dans ce cadre, les différentes dimensions du politique trouvent leur place sans se confondre. Le droit et la législation constituent la forme privilégiée de l’arcalité normativo-politique, en tant qu’ils rendent la règle générale explicite, opposable et amendable. Les dispositifs et politiques publiques relèvent quant à eux principalement de la cratialité : ils assurent la mise en œuvre concrète des normes, leur traduction opératoire et leur inscription dans des formes d’action, d’administration et de gouvernement. Enfin, le débat politique — sous ses formes institutionnelles ou élargies — constitue l’une des expressions majeures de l’archicration, en tant qu’il expose la norme à la contradiction, à la révision et à la reformulation. L’idéologie, pour sa part, ne constitue pas un niveau distinct : elle traverse ces différentes dimensions, pouvant à la fois orienter les principes de fondation, structurer les dispositifs et configurer les cadres de la conflictualité. +Dans ce cadre, les différentes dimensions du politique trouvent leur +place sans se confondre. Le droit et la législation constituent la forme +privilégiée de l'arcalité normativo-politique, en tant qu'ils rendent la +règle générale explicite, opposable et amendable. Les dispositifs et +politiques publiques relèvent quant à eux principalement de la +cratialité : ils assurent la mise en œuvre concrète des normes, leur +traduction opératoire et leur inscription dans des formes d'action, +d'administration et de gouvernement. Enfin, le débat politique — sous +ses formes institutionnelles ou élargies — constitue l'une des +expressions majeures de l'archicration, en tant qu'il expose la norme à +la contradiction, à la révision et à la reformulation. L'idéologie, pour +sa part, ne constitue pas un niveau distinct : elle traverse ces +différentes dimensions, pouvant à la fois orienter les principes de +fondation, structurer les dispositifs et configurer les cadres de la +conflictualité. -L’arcalité propre à ce régime réside ainsi dans une classe particulière d’objets : lois, statuts, édits civiques, déclarations de principes, ordonnances générales ou règles collectives formulées comme valables pour tous dans un espace politique donné. +L'arcalité propre à ce régime réside ainsi dans une classe particulière +d'objets : lois, statuts, édits civiques, déclarations de principes, +ordonnances générales ou règles collectives formulées comme valables +pour tous dans un espace politique donné. -Ces objets n’épuisent pourtant pas à eux seuls la réalité du méta-régime. Leur effectivité dépend de la manière dont ils sont relayés par des dispositifs d’application, des administrations, des instruments d’action publique et des scènes de débat qui en maintiennent ou en déplacent la portée. La norme n’existe politiquement qu’à travers l’ensemble des médiations qui la rendent à la fois agissante et discutable. +Ces objets n'épuisent pourtant pas à eux seuls la réalité du +méta-régime. Leur effectivité dépend de la manière dont ils sont relayés +par des dispositifs d'application, des administrations, des instruments +d'action publique et des scènes de débat qui en maintiennent ou en +déplacent la portée. La norme n'existe politiquement qu'à travers +l'ensemble des médiations qui la rendent à la fois agissante et +discutable. -Ces normes ne se contentent pas de décrire un ordre antérieur ; elles le formalisent pour le rendre visible, opposable et révisable. Ce qui les fonde n’est ni leur ancienneté, ni leur sacralité, ni leur seule inscription, mais leur modalité d’énonciation publique et leur prétention à régler le commun sous condition d’amendement. +Ces normes ne se contentent pas de décrire un ordre antérieur ; elles le +formalisent pour le rendre visible, opposable et révisable. Ce qui les +fonde n'est ni leur ancienneté, ni leur sacralité, ni leur seule +inscription, mais leur modalité d'énonciation publique et leur +prétention à régler le commun sous condition d'amendement. -Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d’en saisir la logique. À Athènes, la distinction entre *nomos* et décret ponctuel marque déjà l’émergence d’une règle générale exposée à la procédure de révision. À Rome, la *lex rogata* affichée et promulguée vaut comme norme opposable au corps civique tout entier. Dans les cités communales italiennes, les statuts municipaux forment également des ensembles de règles publiques, amendables et archivées, qui n’ont pas besoin d’une fondation théologique pour produire de l’obligation. Dans d’autres contextes encore, y compris non européens, on rencontre des formes orales mais formalisées de règle collective déclarée devant tous, à travers des conseils ou des assemblées habilitées à rendre la norme commune, publique et révisable. +Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d'en saisir la logique. +À Athènes, la distinction entre *nomos* et décret ponctuel marque déjà +l'émergence d'une règle générale exposée à la procédure de révision. À +Rome, la *lex rogata* affichée et promulguée vaut comme norme opposable +au corps civique tout entier. Dans les cités communales italiennes, les +statuts municipaux forment également des ensembles de règles publiques, +amendables et archivées, qui n'ont pas besoin d'une fondation +théologique pour produire de l'obligation. Dans d'autres contextes +encore, y compris non européens, on rencontre des formes orales mais +formalisées de règle collective déclarée devant tous, à travers des +conseils ou des assemblées habilitées à rendre la norme commune, +publique et révisable. -L’arcalité normativo-politique ne repose donc ni sur le texte en tant que relique, ni sur le document en tant que preuve, ni sur la tradition en tant qu’héritage. Elle repose sur une norme générale tenue pour légitime parce qu’elle a été énoncée dans les formes politiques reconnues, adressée au collectif comme telle, et maintenue dans l’horizon de sa possible reprise. La règle n’y est pas vénérée : elle est exposée. +L'arcalité normativo-politique ne repose donc ni sur le texte en tant +que relique, ni sur le document en tant que preuve, ni sur la tradition +en tant qu'héritage. Elle repose sur une norme générale tenue pour +légitime parce qu'elle a été énoncée dans les formes politiques +reconnues, adressée au collectif comme telle, et maintenue dans +l'horizon de sa possible reprise. La règle n'y est pas vénérée : elle +est exposée. -Cette exposition ne doit pas être comprise au sens minimal d’une simple publicité matérielle. Elle transforme le statut même de la norme : celle-ci n’est plus seulement tenue pour applicable, mais devient un objet politique distinct, identifiable, adressable, susceptible d’être repris par d’autres que ses énonciateurs initiaux. L’arcalité normativo-politique ne se réduit donc pas à la généralité abstraite de la règle ; elle suppose que le commun puisse se reconnaître comme destinataire d’une obligation formulée en son nom. +Cette exposition ne doit pas être comprise au sens minimal d'une simple +publicité matérielle. Elle transforme le statut même de la norme : +celle-ci n'est plus seulement tenue pour applicable, mais devient un +objet politique distinct, identifiable, adressable, susceptible d'être +repris par d'autres que ses énonciateurs initiaux. L'arcalité +normativo-politique ne se réduit donc pas à la généralité abstraite de +la règle ; elle suppose que le commun puisse se reconnaître comme +destinataire d'une obligation formulée en son nom. -Si l’arcalité du régime normativo-politique repose sur la formulation publique d’une règle générale opposable, sa cratialité réside dans les instances légitimes qui peuvent parler au nom du commun pour édicter cette règle. Le pouvoir normatif n’y procède ni d’une consécration sacrale, ni d’une expertise savante, ni d’une simple maîtrise documentaire. Il procède d’une habilitation politique reconnue : mandat, élection, tirage, désignation collégiale, délégation civique. La cratialité normativo-politique est donc une autorité d’énonciation instituée, profane et limitée. +Si l'arcalité du régime normativo-politique repose sur la formulation +publique d'une règle générale opposable, sa cratialité réside dans les +instances légitimes qui peuvent parler au nom du commun pour édicter +cette règle. Le pouvoir normatif n'y procède ni d'une consécration +sacrale, ni d'une expertise savante, ni d'une simple maîtrise +documentaire. Il procède d'une habilitation politique reconnue : mandat, +élection, tirage, désignation collégiale, délégation civique. La +cratialité normativo-politique est donc une autorité d'énonciation +instituée, profane et limitée. -Dans ce régime, édicter la norme n’est pas appliquer mécaniquement un ordre supérieur ; c’est accomplir un acte politique autorisé dans un cadre reconnu. Athènes, Rome, certaines républiques urbaines médiévales ou encore diverses assemblées politiques non européennes montrent, chacune à leur manière, que cette autorité n’est pas celle d’un détenteur de vérité, mais celle d’un organe habilité à formuler du général pour le collectif. Ce qui importe n’est pas la figure personnelle du gouvernant, mais le statut politique de l’instance qui énonce et la reconnaissance du droit qu’elle possède à engager publiquement l’obligation commune. +Dans ce régime, édicter la norme n'est pas appliquer mécaniquement un +ordre supérieur ; c'est accomplir un acte politique autorisé dans un +cadre reconnu. Athènes, Rome, certaines républiques urbaines médiévales +ou encore diverses assemblées politiques non européennes montrent, +chacune à leur manière, que cette autorité n'est pas celle d'un +détenteur de vérité, mais celle d'un organe habilité à formuler du +général pour le collectif. Ce qui importe n'est pas la figure +personnelle du gouvernant, mais le statut politique de l'instance qui +énonce et la reconnaissance du droit qu'elle possède à engager +publiquement l'obligation commune. -Cette cratialité se distingue donc rigoureusement d’autres formes de puissance régulatrice. Elle n’est pas sacrale, puisqu’elle ne parle pas au nom d’une transcendance ; elle n’est pas épistémique, car elle ne tire pas son autorité d’une démonstration ; elle n’est pas scripturo-bureaucratique, puisqu’elle ne vaut pas par la seule conformité documentaire ; enfin, elle n’est pas esthético-symbolique, elle ne s’impose pas par convenance sensible. Sa spécificité tient au fait que la norme contraint parce qu’elle a été énoncée par une autorité politiquement reconnue comme compétente pour engager le commun dans les formes instituées du politique commun. +Cette cratialité se distingue donc rigoureusement d'autres formes de +puissance régulatrice. Elle n'est pas sacrale, puisqu'elle ne parle pas +au nom d'une transcendance ; elle n'est pas épistémique, car elle ne +tire pas son autorité d'une démonstration ; elle n'est pas +scripturo-bureaucratique, puisqu'elle ne vaut pas par la seule +conformité documentaire ; enfin, elle n'est pas esthético-symbolique, +elle ne s'impose pas par convenance sensible. Sa spécificité tient au +fait que la norme contraint parce qu'elle a été énoncée par une autorité +politiquement reconnue comme compétente pour engager le commun dans les +formes instituées du politique commun. -Il faut ici insister sur un point décisif : la cratialité normativo-politique n’est pas la simple détention d’un pouvoir de commandement, mais la capacité reconnue d’engager le collectif par une parole imputable. Elle suppose donc non seulement une habilitation, mais aussi une responsabilité. Celui qui édicte n’agit ni au nom d’une vérité qui le dépasserait entièrement, ni comme relais neutre d’un dispositif préconstitué ; il intervient dans un espace où son acte peut être repris, discuté, contesté et éventuellement corrigé. +Il faut ici insister sur un point décisif : la cratialité +normativo-politique n'est pas la simple détention d'un pouvoir de +commandement, mais la capacité reconnue d'engager le collectif par une +parole imputable. Elle suppose donc non seulement une habilitation, mais +aussi une responsabilité. Celui qui édicte n'agit ni au nom d'une vérité +qui le dépasserait entièrement, ni comme relais neutre d'un dispositif +préconstitué ; il intervient dans un espace où son acte peut être +repris, discuté, contesté et éventuellement corrigé. -Dans les régimes où la norme vaut parce qu’elle a été instituée dans un espace politique légitime, l’archicration apparaît lorsque cette norme devient elle-même l’objet d’une épreuve réglée. Ce qui est alors mis en jeu n’est ni la fidélité à une source, ni la cohérence d’un savoir, ni la validité d’une procédure technique, mais la recevabilité publique de la règle comme obligation commune. L’archicration normativo-politique désigne donc la scène dans laquelle une collectivité organise le droit de contester, d’amender, de suspendre ou d’abroger ses propres normes générales. +Dans les régimes où la norme vaut parce qu'elle a été instituée dans un +espace politique légitime, l'archicration apparaît lorsque cette norme +devient elle-même l'objet d'une épreuve réglée. Ce qui est alors mis en +jeu n'est ni la fidélité à une source, ni la cohérence d'un savoir, ni +la validité d'une procédure technique, mais la recevabilité publique de +la règle comme obligation commune. L'archicration normativo-politique +désigne donc la scène dans laquelle une collectivité organise le droit +de contester, d'amender, de suspendre ou d'abroger ses propres normes +générales. -Sa spécificité tient à ceci : le désaccord n’y est pas une défaillance du régime, mais l’une de ses conditions internes de légitimation. Assemblées, procédures d’appel, chambres de révision, objections formalisées, droits de veto ou de recours, consultations contradictoires constituent autant de formes par lesquelles la norme demeure tenue parce qu’elle reste exposée à la contradiction. Athènes avec la *graphè paranomôn*, Rome avec certaines formes d’appel politique, ou diverses traditions délibératives où une décision collective peut être reprise dans un lieu et un temps institués, montrent que la règle n’y est forte qu’à condition de n’être jamais absolument close. +Sa spécificité tient à ceci : le désaccord n'y est pas une défaillance +du régime, mais l'une de ses conditions internes de légitimation. +Assemblées, procédures d'appel, chambres de révision, objections +formalisées, droits de veto ou de recours, consultations contradictoires +constituent autant de formes par lesquelles la norme demeure tenue parce +qu'elle reste exposée à la contradiction. Athènes avec la *graphè +paranomôn*, Rome avec certaines formes d'appel politique, ou diverses +traditions délibératives où une décision collective peut être reprise +dans un lieu et un temps institués, montrent que la règle n'y est forte +qu'à condition de n'être jamais absolument close. -L’archicration normativo-politique ne doit donc pas être confondue avec la simple existence d’un débat ou d’une assemblée. Elle commence seulement lorsqu’une procédure reconnue permet de transformer le conflit sur la norme en opérateur de régulation. Ce n’est pas le désordre qui y est légitimé, mais le différend réglé ; ce n’est pas la dissolution de la règle, mais son entretien public par exposition à la reprise. La co-viabilité n’y repose pas sur la suppression de la contradiction, mais sur son institution. +L'archicration normativo-politique ne doit donc pas être confondue avec +la simple existence d'un débat ou d'une assemblée. Elle commence +seulement lorsqu'une procédure reconnue permet de transformer le conflit +sur la norme en opérateur de régulation. Ce n'est pas le désordre qui y +est légitimé, mais le différend réglé ; ce n'est pas la dissolution de +la règle, mais son entretien public par exposition à la reprise. La +co-viabilité n'y repose pas sur la suppression de la contradiction, mais +sur son institution. -Ce qui fait la singularité irréductible de ce méta-régime, ce n’est ni la généralité de la norme, ni sa publicité formelle, ni même son inscription. Ce qui le définit, c’est la présence d’une scène instituée dans laquelle la norme est mise en débat non pas parce qu’elle est contestée, mais parce qu’elle doit l’être pour être tenue. +Ce qui fait la singularité irréductible de ce méta-régime, ce n'est ni +la généralité de la norme, ni sa publicité formelle, ni même son +inscription. Ce qui le définit, c'est la présence d'une scène instituée +dans laquelle la norme est mise en débat non pas parce qu'elle est +contestée, mais parce qu'elle doit l'être pour être tenue. -La règle y est forte parce qu’elle est exposée à la faiblesse argumentée. L’ordre y tient parce qu’il s’offre à la critique réglée. La co-viabilité y repose non sur l’adhésion, mais sur la possibilité d’intervenir dans l’élaboration, la contestation ou la modification de l’obligation commune. +La règle y est forte parce qu'elle est exposée à la faiblesse +argumentée. L'ordre y tient parce qu'il s'offre à la critique réglée. La +co-viabilité y repose non sur l'adhésion, mais sur la possibilité +d'intervenir dans l'élaboration, la contestation ou la modification de +l'obligation commune. -En ce sens, l’*archicration normativo-politique* n’est pas une simple régulation du conflit : elle est la formalisation du droit à la dissension, dans un cadre qui transforme cette dissension en opérateur de légitimité. +En ce sens, l'*archicration normativo-politique* n'est pas une simple +régulation du conflit : elle est la formalisation du droit à la +dissension, dans un cadre qui transforme cette dissension en opérateur +de légitimité. -Cela implique que la contradiction n’y soit jamais pure négativité. Elle doit être distinguée du refus brut, de la sédition informe ou de la simple obstruction. Dans ce régime, contester, c’est encore participer à la tenue du commun, dès lors que cette contestation emprunte les formes reconnues de la reprise. L’archicration normativo-politique transforme ainsi l’opposition en ressource de légitimation : non parce qu’elle célèbre indéfiniment le dissensus, mais parce qu’elle fait de sa mise en forme la condition d’une obligation durablement soutenable. +Cela implique que la contradiction n'y soit jamais pure négativité. Elle +doit être distinguée du refus brut, de la sédition informe ou de la +simple obstruction. Dans ce régime, contester, c'est encore participer à +la tenue du commun, dès lors que cette contestation emprunte les formes +reconnues de la reprise. L'archicration normativo-politique transforme +ainsi l'opposition en ressource de légitimation : non parce qu'elle +célèbre indéfiniment le dissensus, mais parce qu'elle fait de sa mise en +forme la condition d'une obligation durablement soutenable. -Comme tout méta-régime, l’archicration normativo-politique connaît ses fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque la norme demeure formellement publique mais cesse d’être réellement contestable ; lorsque les procédures de révision deviennent purement décoratives ; lorsque l’accès à la scène contradictoire est réservé de fait à quelques acteurs seulement ; ou encore lorsque la production normative est absorbée par d’autres logiques de légitimation. +Comme tout méta-régime, l'archicration normativo-politique connaît ses +fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque la norme demeure formellement +publique mais cesse d'être réellement contestable ; lorsque les +procédures de révision deviennent purement décoratives ; lorsque l'accès +à la scène contradictoire est réservé de fait à quelques acteurs +seulement ; ou encore lorsque la production normative est absorbée par +d'autres logiques de légitimation. -L’idéologie n’apparaît pas ici comme une vulgaire couche ajoutée au droit ou au débat. Elle travaille le méta-régime de l’intérieur : en amont, lorsqu’elle oriente les principes au nom desquels la norme se présente comme commune ; au milieu, lorsqu’elle informe la sélection des instruments, des politiques publiques et des priorités de gouvernement ; en aval, lorsqu’elle configure les lignes de partage du conflit, les styles d’argumentation et les formes recevables de la dissension. Elle ne se substitue donc ni à la loi, ni au dispositif, ni au débat, mais traverse leur articulation et peut en renforcer ou en déformer la dynamique propre. +L'idéologie n'apparaît pas ici comme une vulgaire couche ajoutée au +droit ou au débat. Elle travaille le méta-régime de l'intérieur : en +amont, lorsqu'elle oriente les principes au nom desquels la norme se +présente comme commune ; au milieu, lorsqu'elle informe la sélection des +instruments, des politiques publiques et des priorités de gouvernement ; +en aval, lorsqu'elle configure les lignes de partage du conflit, les +styles d'argumentation et les formes recevables de la dissension. Elle +ne se substitue donc ni à la loi, ni au dispositif, ni au débat, mais +traverse leur articulation et peut en renforcer ou en déformer la +dynamique propre. -Trois dérives principales peuvent alors être observées. La première est la clôture de la norme : ce qui devait rester amendable devient intangible, soit par sacralisation, soit par routinisation. La deuxième est la technicisation : la règle conserve son apparence politique, mais sa fabrication réelle passe sous le contrôle d’opérateurs experts, administratifs ou gestionnaires, qui neutralisent la contradiction au profit de l’efficacité. La troisième est l’esthétisation ou la ritualisation : la norme subsiste comme forme solennelle, affichée et célébrée, mais n’est plus véritablement exposée à l’épreuve du dissensus. +Trois dérives principales peuvent alors être observées. La première est +la clôture de la norme : ce qui devait rester amendable devient +intangible, soit par sacralisation, soit par routinisation. La deuxième +est la technicisation : la règle conserve son apparence politique, mais +sa fabrication réelle passe sous le contrôle d'opérateurs experts, +administratifs ou gestionnaires, qui neutralisent la contradiction au +profit de l'efficacité. La troisième est l'esthétisation ou la +ritualisation : la norme subsiste comme forme solennelle, affichée et +célébrée, mais n'est plus véritablement exposée à l'épreuve du +dissensus. -Ces dérives n’abolissent pas nécessairement le régime ; elles en révèlent plutôt les conditions de possibilité. Pour qu’une archicration normativo-politique demeure effective, il faut que la norme reste publiquement formulée, que l’autorité qui l’édicte demeure politiquement imputable, et que la contradiction conserve une prise réelle sur la règle. Lorsque l’un de ces trois termes se défait, la norme persiste peut-être ; mais elle cesse d’être tenue selon le mode proprement normativo-politique. +Ces dérives n'abolissent pas nécessairement le régime ; elles en +révèlent plutôt les conditions de possibilité. Pour qu'une archicration +normativo-politique demeure effective, il faut que la norme reste +publiquement formulée, que l'autorité qui l'édicte demeure politiquement +imputable, et que la contradiction conserve une prise réelle sur la +règle. Lorsque l'un de ces trois termes se défait, la norme persiste +peut-être ; mais elle cesse d'être tenue selon le mode proprement +normativo-politique. -Parvenue à son point de clôture, cette analyse permet d’affirmer l’existence d’un méta-régime spécifique de régulation, irréductible aux configurations sacrales, scripturales, techniciennes, savantes ou esthético-symboliques. Son architecture tient dans un triptyque net : une arcalité fondée sur la formulation publique de normes générales opposables ; une cratialité localisée dans des instances politiques profanes habilitées à parler au nom du commun ; une archicration structurée par la possibilité instituée de contester, réviser et reformuler la règle. +Parvenue à son point de clôture, cette analyse permet d'affirmer +l'existence d'un méta-régime spécifique de régulation, irréductible aux +configurations sacrales, scripturales, techniciennes, savantes ou +esthético-symboliques. Son architecture tient dans un triptyque net : +une arcalité fondée sur la formulation publique de normes générales +opposables ; une cratialité localisée dans des instances politiques +profanes habilitées à parler au nom du commun ; une archicration +structurée par la possibilité instituée de contester, réviser et +reformuler la règle. -Ce qui fait sa singularité profonde n’est ni la présence d’un texte, ni la simple existence d’une autorité, mais la reconnaissance explicite d’un droit de dissension réglé. La norme y oblige non d’abord parce qu’elle serait vraie, sacrée ou techniquement optimale, mais parce qu’elle a été politiquement énoncée dans des formes qui rendent possible sa mise à l’épreuve. +Ce qui fait sa singularité profonde n'est ni la présence d'un texte, ni +la simple existence d'une autorité, mais la reconnaissance explicite +d'un droit de dissension réglé. La norme y oblige non d'abord parce +qu'elle serait vraie, sacrée ou techniquement optimale, mais parce +qu'elle a été politiquement énoncée dans des formes qui rendent possible +sa mise à l'épreuve. -Le débat politique n’est donc pas ici un supplément expressif ou une scène secondaire d’opinion. Il constitue l’une des formes majeures de l’archicration elle-même, dès lors qu’il permet de transformer une opposition diffuse en contradiction réglée, de déplacer la norme sans la dissoudre, et de rendre visible la prise effective du dissensus sur l’obligation commune. Là où le débat n’est plus qu’un théâtre sans effet, la forme normativo-politique subsiste peut-être ; mais elle se vide de son ressort archicratique propre. +Le débat politique n'est donc pas ici un supplément expressif ou une +scène secondaire d'opinion. Il constitue l'une des formes majeures de +l'archicration elle-même, dès lors qu'il permet de transformer une +opposition diffuse en contradiction réglée, de déplacer la norme sans la +dissoudre, et de rendre visible la prise effective du dissensus sur +l'obligation commune. Là où le débat n'est plus qu'un théâtre sans +effet, la forme normativo-politique subsiste peut-être ; mais elle se +vide de son ressort archicratique propre. -C’est précisément en cela que ce régime occupe une place singulière dans la topologie archicratique générale. D’autres méta-régimes tendent à stabiliser l’obligation en la soustrayant autant que possible à la remise en cause ; le régime normativo-politique, lui, la stabilise en l’exposant. Sa force propre n’est pas de neutraliser la contestation, mais de lui donner forme. Il produit un ordre qui ne se maintient pas malgré la possibilité du conflit normatif, mais par son institution même. +C'est précisément en cela que ce régime occupe une place singulière dans +la topologie archicratique générale. D'autres méta-régimes tendent à +stabiliser l'obligation en la soustrayant autant que possible à la +remise en cause ; le régime normativo-politique, lui, la stabilise en +l'exposant. Sa force propre n'est pas de neutraliser la contestation, +mais de lui donner forme. Il produit un ordre qui ne se maintient pas +malgré la possibilité du conflit normatif, mais par son institution +même. -L’archicration normativo-politique rend ainsi possible une forme spécifique de régulation : une obligation collective sans clôture transcendante, une contrainte sans dogme et une stabilité principiellement amendable. Elle ne constitue ni l’horizon achevé du politique, ni sa forme supérieure ; mais elle désigne l’un des régimes dans lesquels une collectivité accepte de se régler elle-même à condition de reconnaître que ses propres règles demeurent, en droit, discutables. Elle occupe en cela une place pleinement irréductible dans la typologie archicratique. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe. +L'archicration normativo-politique rend ainsi possible une forme +spécifique de régulation : une obligation collective sans clôture +transcendante, une contrainte sans dogme et une stabilité +principiellement amendable. Elle ne constitue ni l'horizon achevé du +politique, ni sa forme supérieure ; mais elle désigne l'un des régimes +dans lesquels une collectivité accepte de se régler elle-même à +condition de reconnaître que ses propres règles demeurent, en droit, +discutables. Elle occupe en cela une place pleinement irréductible dans +la typologie archicratique. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est +présenté en annexe. ### 2.2.11 — *Archicrations marchandes* -Parmi les méta-régimes de co-viabilité que nous mettons au jour, le régime marchand occupe une place singulière. Il est souvent réduit à une simple fonction d’échange, ou projeté dans les catégories modernes du marché autorégulé ; pourtant, dans de nombreuses sociétés historiques, la scène marchande a constitué un espace de régulation propre, capable de produire de l’ordre sans que sa validité première repose sur une transcendance, sur une souveraineté centrale ou sur un dogme préalable. Nous désignons ici par archicration marchande ce méta-régime dans lequel le lien social se règle à travers l’épreuve située de la valeur, c’est-à-dire par la reconnaissance négociée d’équivalences, d’engagements et de garanties. +Parmi les méta-régimes de co-viabilité que nous mettons au jour, le +régime marchand occupe une place singulière. Il est souvent réduit à une +simple fonction d'échange, ou projeté dans les catégories modernes du +marché autorégulé ; pourtant, dans de nombreuses sociétés historiques, +la scène marchande a constitué un espace de régulation propre, capable +de produire de l'ordre sans que sa validité première repose sur une +transcendance, sur une souveraineté centrale ou sur un dogme préalable. +Nous désignons ici par archicration marchande ce méta-régime dans lequel +le lien social se règle à travers l'épreuve située de la valeur, +c'est-à-dire par la reconnaissance négociée d'équivalences, +d'engagements et de garanties. -Ce régime ne repose pas d’abord sur la révélation, sur la vérité savante, sur la seule force de la loi ou sur la simple efficacité logistique. Il suppose qu’un accord puisse être rendu possible entre des parties distinctes à partir de formes stabilisées de comparabilité : poids, mesures, monnaies de compte, objets calibrés, gages, marques de conformité, procédures de vérification. L’enjeu n’est pas d’accéder à une valeur intrinsèque préalablement donnée, mais de rendre socialement recevable une équivalence praticable entre parties distinctes. En ce sens, l’arcalité marchande repose sur la construction collective d’unités de valeur reconnues, toujours situées, toujours révisables, qui rendent possible un engagement réciproque sans exiger de foi commune ni de principe supérieur. +Ce régime ne repose pas d'abord sur la révélation, sur la vérité +savante, sur la seule force de la loi ou sur la simple efficacité +logistique. Il suppose qu'un accord puisse être rendu possible entre des +parties distinctes à partir de formes stabilisées de comparabilité : +poids, mesures, monnaies de compte, objets calibrés, gages, marques de +conformité, procédures de vérification. L'enjeu n'est pas d'accéder à +une valeur intrinsèque préalablement donnée, mais de rendre socialement +recevable une équivalence praticable entre parties distinctes. En ce +sens, l'arcalité marchande repose sur la construction collective +d'unités de valeur reconnues, toujours situées, toujours révisables, qui +rendent possible un engagement réciproque sans exiger de foi commune ni +de principe supérieur. -C’est en ce point que le méta-régime marchand se distingue du méta-régime normativo-politique. Là où ce dernier règle le commun par l’énonciation publique de normes générales opposables, le régime marchand règle prioritairement la relation entre parties distinctes par la recevabilité négociée d’une équivalence, d’un prix, d’un gage ou d’un engagement. Garanties, arbitrages, vérifications et médiations peuvent exister dans les deux cas ; mais ils n’y valent pas pour la même raison. Dans le normativo-politique, ils visent la validité d’une règle commune. Dans le marchand, ils visent la reconnaissance praticable d’une équivalence contestable. +C'est en ce point que le méta-régime marchand se distingue du +méta-régime normativo-politique. Là où ce dernier règle le commun par +l'énonciation publique de normes générales opposables, le régime +marchand règle prioritairement la relation entre parties distinctes par +la recevabilité négociée d'une équivalence, d'un prix, d'un gage ou d'un +engagement. Garanties, arbitrages, vérifications et médiations peuvent +exister dans les deux cas ; mais ils n'y valent pas pour la même raison. +Dans le normativo-politique, ils visent la validité d'une règle commune. +Dans le marchand, ils visent la reconnaissance praticable d'une +équivalence contestable. -Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d’en saisir la logique. À Sumer, l’usage du shekel d’argent comme monnaie de compte et de l’orge comme référence d’équivalence permet d’adosser prêts, dettes et contrats à des formes stabilisées de calcul de l’engagement. Dans les cités africaines de l’or, les poids codifiés et les objets de mesure transmis au sein de réseaux marchands ne fonctionnent pas comme de simples outils techniques, mais comme médiateurs d’une reconnaissance mutuelle de la valeur. Dans les républiques marchandes méditerranéennes, enfin, balances publiques, tables de conversion, sceaux de certification et chambres des poids rendent l’équivalence visible, vérifiable et contestable. Dans tous ces cas, l’arcalité ne fixe pas un prix absolu : elle institue les conditions pratiques de sa reconnaissance. +Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d'en saisir la logique. +À Sumer, l'usage du shekel d'argent comme monnaie de compte et de l'orge +comme référence d'équivalence permet d'adosser prêts, dettes et contrats +à des formes stabilisées de calcul de l'engagement. Dans les cités +africaines de l'or, les poids codifiés et les objets de mesure transmis +au sein de réseaux marchands ne fonctionnent pas comme de simples outils +techniques, mais comme médiateurs d'une reconnaissance mutuelle de la +valeur. Dans les républiques marchandes méditerranéennes, enfin, +balances publiques, tables de conversion, sceaux de certification et +chambres des poids rendent l'équivalence visible, vérifiable et +contestable. Dans tous ces cas, l'arcalité ne fixe pas un prix absolu : +elle institue les conditions pratiques de sa reconnaissance. -Cette logique n’implique nullement que le marchand soit indépendant de toute forme politique ou juridique. Elle signifie plus précisément que, dans ces configurations, les appuis normatifs et institutionnels ne valent pas d’abord comme fondement propre de l’obligation, mais comme conditions de sécurisation et de reprise d’une scène dont le principe de validité demeure l’équivalence recevable entre acteurs distincts. Le marchand peut donc s’adosser au politique sans s’y réduire. +Cette logique n'implique nullement que le marchand soit indépendant de +toute forme politique ou juridique. Elle signifie plus précisément que, +dans ces configurations, les appuis normatifs et institutionnels ne +valent pas d'abord comme fondement propre de l'obligation, mais comme +conditions de sécurisation et de reprise d'une scène dont le principe de +validité demeure l'équivalence recevable entre acteurs distincts. Le +marchand peut donc s'adosser au politique sans s'y réduire. -L’arcalité marchande ne se réduit donc ni à la mesure, ni à l’objet, ni au contrat. Elle réside dans la possibilité socialement admise de comparer sans détruire le lien, d’engager sans fusionner, d’échanger sans recourir à une vérité supérieure. Ce qui fonde ici l’ordre, ce n’est pas la chose elle-même, mais la forme reconnue sous laquelle elle peut valoir pour d’autres. Le marché, en ce sens, n’est pas seulement un lieu de circulation ; il est une scène de mise en forme de l’équivalence. +L'arcalité marchande ne se réduit donc ni à la mesure, ni à l'objet, ni +au contrat. Elle réside dans la possibilité socialement admise de +comparer sans détruire le lien, d'engager sans fusionner, d'échanger +sans recourir à une vérité supérieure. Ce qui fonde ici l'ordre, ce +n'est pas la chose elle-même, mais la forme reconnue sous laquelle elle +peut valoir pour d'autres. Le marché, en ce sens, n'est pas seulement un +lieu de circulation ; il est une scène de mise en forme de +l'équivalence. -Il faut insister ici sur un point décisif : l’équivalence marchande n’est jamais une donnée brute, mais une construction relationnelle. Elle ne suppose pas que les choses soient identiques, ni même comparables en elles-mêmes ; elle suppose qu’une société se soit donné les moyens de les rendre comparables sans abolir leur hétérogénéité. Le grain, le métal, le tissu, le sel, le bétail ou la dette ne valent pas parce qu’ils participeraient d’une substance commune, mais parce qu’ils peuvent être inscrits dans un espace de conversion reconnu. L’arcalité marchande ne produit donc pas une vérité de la valeur ; elle institue la possibilité pratique d’un accord sur ce qui pourra faire valeur pour d’autres, dans une scène déterminée. +Il faut insister ici sur un point décisif : l'équivalence marchande +n'est jamais une donnée brute, mais une construction relationnelle. Elle +ne suppose pas que les choses soient identiques, ni même comparables en +elles-mêmes ; elle suppose qu'une société se soit donné les moyens de +les rendre comparables sans abolir leur hétérogénéité. Le grain, le +métal, le tissu, le sel, le bétail ou la dette ne valent pas parce +qu'ils participeraient d'une substance commune, mais parce qu'ils +peuvent être inscrits dans un espace de conversion reconnu. L'arcalité +marchande ne produit donc pas une vérité de la valeur ; elle institue la +possibilité pratique d'un accord sur ce qui pourra faire valeur pour +d'autres, dans une scène déterminée. -En cela, l’arcalité marchande se distingue avec netteté d’une ontologie spontanée de la valeur. Elle ne présuppose ni substance commune des choses, ni vérité cachée des prix, ni adéquation naturelle entre un bien et sa contrepartie. Ce qu’elle institue, c’est une surface de commensurabilité praticable, toujours relative à des usages, à des médiations et à des milieux d’échange déterminés. Autrement dit, la valeur marchande n’apparaît jamais comme un fondement absolu, mais comme une forme socialement tenue de comparabilité. Cette propriété est capitale : elle explique que le marché puisse réguler sans transcendance, non parce qu’il abolirait toute normativité, mais parce qu’il déplace celle-ci dans la reconnaissance pratique de ce qui peut, ici et maintenant, valoir pour d’autres. +En cela, l'arcalité marchande se distingue avec netteté d'une ontologie +spontanée de la valeur. Elle ne présuppose ni substance commune des +choses, ni vérité cachée des prix, ni adéquation naturelle entre un bien +et sa contrepartie. Ce qu'elle institue, c'est une surface de +commensurabilité praticable, toujours relative à des usages, à des +médiations et à des milieux d'échange déterminés. Autrement dit, la +valeur marchande n'apparaît jamais comme un fondement absolu, mais comme +une forme socialement tenue de comparabilité. Cette propriété est +capitale : elle explique que le marché puisse réguler sans +transcendance, non parce qu'il abolirait toute normativité, mais parce +qu'il déplace celle-ci dans la reconnaissance pratique de ce qui peut, +ici et maintenant, valoir pour d'autres. -Si l’arcalité marchande repose sur la reconnaissance sociale de l’équivalence, sa cratialité réside dans les figures capables de garantir l’ajustement effectif des engagements. Le régime marchand ne fonctionne pas sans médiateurs : changeurs, courtiers, juges de foire, peseurs assermentés, inspecteurs de marché, syndics, intercesseurs ou garants. Leur autorité n’est ni souveraine, ni doctrinale, ni savante au sens strict ; elle est située, relationnelle et reconnue pour sa capacité à rendre l’échange praticable sans rupture du lien. +Si l'arcalité marchande repose sur la reconnaissance sociale de +l'équivalence, sa cratialité réside dans les figures capables de +garantir l'ajustement effectif des engagements. Le régime marchand ne +fonctionne pas sans médiateurs : changeurs, courtiers, juges de foire, +peseurs assermentés, inspecteurs de marché, syndics, intercesseurs ou +garants. Leur autorité n'est ni souveraine, ni doctrinale, ni savante au +sens strict ; elle est située, relationnelle et reconnue pour sa +capacité à rendre l'échange praticable sans rupture du lien. -Les foires de Champagne en offrent un exemple classique : les litiges y sont arbitrés rapidement par des juges marchands dont la légitimité tient moins à une délégation princière qu’à leur compétence reconnue à restaurer un équilibre acceptable entre les parties. De manière comparable, dans les villes musulmanes, le muḥtasib intervient sur les poids, les mesures, la qualité des biens et certains différends, non pour produire la loi, mais pour maintenir la justesse pratique des échanges. Dans plusieurs marchés ouest-africains, enfin, des courtiers ou médiateurs reconnus traduisent les usages, vérifient les équivalences et rendent possible l’accord entre acteurs différents. Dans tous ces cas, l’autorité est fonctionnelle au lien marchand lui-même : elle ne commande pas de l’extérieur, elle stabilise la scène. +Les foires de Champagne en offrent un exemple classique : les litiges y +sont arbitrés rapidement par des juges marchands dont la légitimité +tient moins à une délégation princière qu'à leur compétence reconnue à +restaurer un équilibre acceptable entre les parties. De manière +comparable, dans les villes musulmanes, le muḥtasib intervient sur les +poids, les mesures, la qualité des biens et certains différends, non +pour produire la loi, mais pour maintenir la justesse pratique des +échanges. Dans plusieurs marchés ouest-africains, enfin, des courtiers +ou médiateurs reconnus traduisent les usages, vérifient les équivalences +et rendent possible l'accord entre acteurs différents. Dans tous ces +cas, l'autorité est fonctionnelle au lien marchand lui-même : elle ne +commande pas de l'extérieur, elle stabilise la scène. -La cratialité marchande se distingue ainsi des autres régimes par sa nature intermédiaire. Elle ne parle pas au nom d’une transcendance ; elle ne démontre pas ; elle ne décrète pas ; elle ne vaut pas par simple inscription documentaire. Elle garantit, au cas par cas, la fiabilité d’une transaction et la recevabilité d’un engagement. Son pouvoir est borné, révocable, dépendant de la confiance qu’il inspire. Mais c’est précisément cette limitation qui en fait la force propre : dans le régime marchand, l’autorité ne produit pas la valeur, elle rend possible sa reconnaissance partagée. +La cratialité marchande se distingue ainsi des autres régimes par sa +nature intermédiaire. Elle ne parle pas au nom d'une transcendance ; +elle ne démontre pas ; elle ne décrète pas ; elle ne vaut pas par simple +inscription documentaire. Elle garantit, au cas par cas, la fiabilité +d'une transaction et la recevabilité d'un engagement. Son pouvoir est +borné, révocable, dépendant de la confiance qu'il inspire. Mais c'est +précisément cette limitation qui en fait la force propre : dans le +régime marchand, l'autorité ne produit pas la valeur, elle rend possible +sa reconnaissance partagée. -Cette propriété mérite d’être soulignée. La cratialité marchande n’est ni spectaculaire ni fondatrice au sens fort : elle opère dans l’intervalle, dans le réglage, dans la médiation. Elle ne vaut qu’aussi longtemps qu’elle inspire assez de confiance pour éviter que le différend ne se transforme en rupture. C’est pourquoi ses figures typiques ne sont presque jamais des souverains, mais des tiers : elles occupent une position d’entre-deux, suffisamment reconnue pour arbitrer, insuffisamment absolue pour s’imposer seules. Leur puissance est moins une puissance de décision finale qu’une puissance de rétablissement de la scène commune. Elles garantissent que l’échange demeure rejouable ; c’est en cela qu’elles participent pleinement de la co-viabilité. +Cette propriété mérite d'être soulignée. La cratialité marchande n'est +ni spectaculaire ni fondatrice au sens fort : elle opère dans +l'intervalle, dans le réglage, dans la médiation. Elle ne vaut qu'aussi +longtemps qu'elle inspire assez de confiance pour éviter que le +différend ne se transforme en rupture. C'est pourquoi ses figures +typiques ne sont presque jamais des souverains, mais des tiers : elles +occupent une position d'entre-deux, suffisamment reconnue pour arbitrer, +insuffisamment absolue pour s'imposer seules. Leur puissance est moins +une puissance de décision finale qu'une puissance de rétablissement de +la scène commune. Elles garantissent que l'échange demeure rejouable ; +c'est en cela qu'elles participent pleinement de la co-viabilité. -Il faut donc comprendre que la confiance, ici, n’est pas un supplément moral extérieur au régime : elle constitue l’un de ses opérateurs internes. Non pas une confiance vague, affective ou naïve, mais une confiance réglée, produite par la répétition d’épreuves réussies, par la fiabilité reconnue des tiers et par la stabilité relative des procédures de vérification. La cratialité marchande ne commande pas la croyance ; elle rend la défiance socialement traitable. C’est pourquoi elle demeure toujours exposée : dès lors qu’un médiateur n’est plus jugé capable de rétablir un accord acceptable, son autorité se dissipe, et avec elle une part de la capacité même du marché à faire tenir le lien. +Il faut donc comprendre que la confiance, ici, n'est pas un supplément +moral extérieur au régime : elle constitue l'un de ses opérateurs +internes. Non pas une confiance vague, affective ou naïve, mais une +confiance réglée, produite par la répétition d'épreuves réussies, par la +fiabilité reconnue des tiers et par la stabilité relative des procédures +de vérification. La cratialité marchande ne commande pas la croyance ; +elle rend la défiance socialement traitable. C'est pourquoi elle demeure +toujours exposée : dès lors qu'un médiateur n'est plus jugé capable de +rétablir un accord acceptable, son autorité se dissipe, et avec elle une +part de la capacité même du marché à faire tenir le lien. -L’archicration marchande apparaît lorsque l’équivalence elle-même devient litigieuse et doit être rejouée dans une scène reconnue de vérification, de discussion ou d’arbitrage. Ce qui est alors mis à l’épreuve, ce n’est pas une vérité doctrinale ni l’application d’une loi générale, mais la recevabilité concrète d’un prix, d’une qualité, d’un poids, d’une dette ou d’une garantie. Le litige n’y constitue pas une anomalie extérieure au régime : il en est l’un des opérateurs centraux. +L'archicration marchande apparaît lorsque l'équivalence elle-même +devient litigieuse et doit être rejouée dans une scène reconnue de +vérification, de discussion ou d'arbitrage. Ce qui est alors mis à +l'épreuve, ce n'est pas une vérité doctrinale ni l'application d'une loi +générale, mais la recevabilité concrète d'un prix, d'une qualité, d'un +poids, d'une dette ou d'une garantie. Le litige n'y constitue pas une +anomalie extérieure au régime : il en est l'un des opérateurs centraux. -C’est pourquoi les espaces marchands historiquement stabilisés se dotent presque toujours de procédures d’ajustement. Dans les foires médiévales, dans certains souks urbains ou dans des marchés africains régulés par des tiers reconnus, le désaccord sur la valeur n’entraîne pas mécaniquement la rupture ; il ouvre une scène de reprise. Témoignage, comparaison, repesée, expertise locale, recours à un médiateur, appel à un précédent ou à une réputation permettent de reformuler l’accord sans détruire le lien. L’archicration marchande est précisément cette capacité à transformer le différend en épreuve régulatrice. +C'est pourquoi les espaces marchands historiquement stabilisés se dotent +presque toujours de procédures d'ajustement. Dans les foires médiévales, +dans certains souks urbains ou dans des marchés africains régulés par +des tiers reconnus, le désaccord sur la valeur n'entraîne pas +mécaniquement la rupture ; il ouvre une scène de reprise. Témoignage, +comparaison, repesée, expertise locale, recours à un médiateur, appel à +un précédent ou à une réputation permettent de reformuler l'accord sans +détruire le lien. L'archicration marchande est précisément cette +capacité à transformer le différend en épreuve régulatrice. -Sa singularité tient à ceci : la co-viabilité marchande ne procède pas de l’élimination du conflit, mais de sa mise en forme. Le marché ne vaut archicratiquement que là où la valeur peut être contestée sans que l’échange cesse d’être pensable. Ce n’est donc ni le contrat, ni le prix, ni la circulation qui fondent en propre le régime, mais la possibilité, toujours située, de rejouer l’équivalence à travers des formes socialement reconnues de médiation. +Sa singularité tient à ceci : la co-viabilité marchande ne procède pas +de l'élimination du conflit, mais de sa mise en forme. Le marché ne vaut +archicratiquement que là où la valeur peut être contestée sans que +l'échange cesse d'être pensable. Ce n'est donc ni le contrat, ni le +prix, ni la circulation qui fondent en propre le régime, mais la +possibilité, toujours située, de rejouer l'équivalence à travers des +formes socialement reconnues de médiation. -En ce sens, l’archicration marchande se distingue profondément des régimes où le conflit porte d’abord sur la vérité, sur la légitimité politique ou sur la fidélité à une source. Ici, le différend ne vise ni à départager des doctrines, ni à trancher une souveraineté, ni à interpréter un texte fondateur. Il porte sur la justesse située d’un rapport d’équivalence. La scène marchande n’a donc pas pour horizon la clôture, mais l’ajustement. Elle ne cherche pas à faire taire la contestation, mais à la convertir en procédure de recalibrage du lien. C’est pourquoi elle constitue une forme archicratique spécifique : elle transforme la dispute sur la valeur en condition même de la continuité de l’échange. +En ce sens, l'archicration marchande se distingue profondément des +régimes où le conflit porte d'abord sur la vérité, sur la légitimité +politique ou sur la fidélité à une source. Ici, le différend ne vise ni +à départager des doctrines, ni à trancher une souveraineté, ni à +interpréter un texte fondateur. Il porte sur la justesse située d'un +rapport d'équivalence. La scène marchande n'a donc pas pour horizon la +clôture, mais l'ajustement. Elle ne cherche pas à faire taire la +contestation, mais à la convertir en procédure de recalibrage du lien. +C'est pourquoi elle constitue une forme archicratique spécifique : elle +transforme la dispute sur la valeur en condition même de la continuité +de l'échange. -Il en résulte une conséquence théorique majeure : dans le régime marchand, la régulation ne vise pas d’abord l’unanimité, mais la reconduction du rapport. L’accord n’y est jamais une fusion des volontés ni la découverte d’une mesure parfaitement juste ; il est un équilibre suffisamment recevable pour que les parties puissent continuer à se reconnaître comme partenaires possibles. L’archicration marchande ne supprime donc pas l’incertitude, elle l’administre sans souveraineté absolue. Elle ne promet ni vérité finale ni clôture définitive, mais seulement la possibilité toujours relancée d’un ajustement praticable. C’est en cela qu’elle constitue une scène de co-viabilité particulièrement subtile : elle fait tenir ensemble des acteurs distincts à partir d’un différend qui n’est pas nié, mais converti en épreuve régulatrice. +Il en résulte une conséquence théorique majeure : dans le régime +marchand, la régulation ne vise pas d'abord l'unanimité, mais la +reconduction du rapport. L'accord n'y est jamais une fusion des volontés +ni la découverte d'une mesure parfaitement juste ; il est un équilibre +suffisamment recevable pour que les parties puissent continuer à se +reconnaître comme partenaires possibles. L'archicration marchande ne +supprime donc pas l'incertitude, elle l'administre sans souveraineté +absolue. Elle ne promet ni vérité finale ni clôture définitive, mais +seulement la possibilité toujours relancée d'un ajustement praticable. +C'est en cela qu'elle constitue une scène de co-viabilité +particulièrement subtile : elle fait tenir ensemble des acteurs +distincts à partir d'un différend qui n'est pas nié, mais converti en +épreuve régulatrice. -Comme tout méta-régime, l’archicration marchande connaît ses fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque les formes d’équivalence cessent d’être crédibles, lorsque les médiateurs perdent leur autorité, lorsque la scène d’ajustement est absorbée par un autre régime, ou lorsque certains acteurs sont exclus du champ même de la reconnaissance. +Comme tout méta-régime, l'archicration marchande connaît ses fragilités. +Elle se désactive lorsque les formes d'équivalence cessent d'être +crédibles, lorsque les médiateurs perdent leur autorité, lorsque la +scène d'ajustement est absorbée par un autre régime, ou lorsque certains +acteurs sont exclus du champ même de la reconnaissance. -Trois dérives principales peuvent être distinguées. La première est la rupture de confiance : poids falsifiés, monnaies discréditées, garanties devenues inopérantes, disparition des tiers de confiance. Dans ce cas, l’échange ne parvient plus à rejouer l’équivalence. La deuxième est l’absorption politico-technique : la valeur n’est plus négociée, mais fixée par décret, par administration ou par calcul logistique, ce qui retire au marché sa scène propre d’épreuve. La troisième est la requalification théologique ou symbolique : certaines marchandises, certaines pratiques ou certaines formes de circulation cessent d’être discutables parce qu’elles deviennent d’abord jugées au regard d’une orthodoxie religieuse ou d’une aura de distinction. +Trois dérives principales peuvent être distinguées. La première est la +rupture de confiance : poids falsifiés, monnaies discréditées, garanties +devenues inopérantes, disparition des tiers de confiance. Dans ce cas, +l'échange ne parvient plus à rejouer l'équivalence. La deuxième est +l'absorption politico-technique : la valeur n'est plus négociée, mais +fixée par décret, par administration ou par calcul logistique, ce qui +retire au marché sa scène propre d'épreuve. La troisième est la +requalification théologique ou symbolique : certaines marchandises, +certaines pratiques ou certaines formes de circulation cessent d'être +discutables parce qu'elles deviennent d'abord jugées au regard d'une +orthodoxie religieuse ou d'une aura de distinction. -Il faut y ajouter une fragilité plus discrète mais décisive : l’exclusion de partenaires réputés non recevables. Dès lors que certains sujets ne peuvent plus comparaître comme acteurs légitimes du lien marchand, l’échange cesse d’être régulateur et tend vers la prédation ou la dépendance asymétrique. Le régime marchand ne s’effondre donc pas seulement par manque d’instruments ; il se défait aussi lorsque la reconnaissance cesse d’être distribuable. +Il faut y ajouter une fragilité plus discrète mais décisive : +l'exclusion de partenaires réputés non recevables. Dès lors que certains +sujets ne peuvent plus comparaître comme acteurs légitimes du lien +marchand, l'échange cesse d'être régulateur et tend vers la prédation ou +la dépendance asymétrique. Le régime marchand ne s'effondre donc pas +seulement par manque d'instruments ; il se défait aussi lorsque la +reconnaissance cesse d'être distribuable. -Cette dernière fragilité est décisive, car elle montre que le régime marchand n’est nullement synonyme d’ouverture illimitée. Il peut fonctionner avec une grande souplesse transactionnelle tout en restant socialement étroit, hiérarchisé et sélectif. Dès lors que la capacité à comparaître dans la scène d’échange est inégalement distribuée, la co-viabilité marchande se maintient peut-être pour certains, mais au prix d’une désactivation partielle pour d’autres. Le marché ne dissout donc pas spontanément les asymétries ; il peut au contraire les reproduire sous forme de recevabilité différentielle. Cette limite doit être conservée au centre de l’analyse, faute de quoi l’archicration marchande risquerait d’être idéalisée comme pure réciprocité, alors même qu’elle demeure historiquement traversée par des exclusions, des dépendances et des accès inégaux à la scène même de l’ajustement. +Cette dernière fragilité est décisive, car elle montre que le régime +marchand n'est nullement synonyme d'ouverture illimitée. Il peut +fonctionner avec une grande souplesse transactionnelle tout en restant +socialement étroit, hiérarchisé et sélectif. Dès lors que la capacité à +comparaître dans la scène d'échange est inégalement distribuée, la +co-viabilité marchande se maintient peut-être pour certains, mais au +prix d'une désactivation partielle pour d'autres. Le marché ne dissout +donc pas spontanément les asymétries ; il peut au contraire les +reproduire sous forme de recevabilité différentielle. Cette limite doit +être conservée au centre de l'analyse, faute de quoi l'archicration +marchande risquerait d'être idéalisée comme pure réciprocité, alors même +qu'elle demeure historiquement traversée par des exclusions, des +dépendances et des accès inégaux à la scène même de l'ajustement. -Parvenue à son point de clôture, cette analyse permet d’affirmer l’existence d’un méta-régime marchand irréductible aux formes sacrales, normatives, épistémiques, techniciennes ou esthético-symboliques. +Parvenue à son point de clôture, cette analyse permet d'affirmer +l'existence d'un méta-régime marchand irréductible aux formes sacrales, +normatives, épistémiques, techniciennes ou esthético-symboliques. -Cette irréductibilité ne tient pas à une absence de toute médiation politique, juridique ou symbolique, mais au fait que la validité y procède en dernier ressort de la possibilité d’établir, de contester et de réajuster une équivalence entre engagements distincts. Ce n’est donc pas l’autonomie sociale absolue du marché qui fonde ici le méta-régime, mais l’autonomie spécifique de son opérateur de validité. +Cette irréductibilité ne tient pas à une absence de toute médiation +politique, juridique ou symbolique, mais au fait que la validité y +procède en dernier ressort de la possibilité d'établir, de contester et +de réajuster une équivalence entre engagements distincts. Ce n'est donc +pas l'autonomie sociale absolue du marché qui fonde ici le méta-régime, +mais l'autonomie spécifique de son opérateur de validité. -Son architecture est nette : une arcalité fondée sur des unités d’équivalence socialement reconnues ; une cratialité exercée par des médiateurs capables de garantir la recevabilité pratique des engagements ; une archicration située dans les scènes où la valeur est contestée, rejouée et ajustée sans que leur validité première repose sur une autorité transcendante ou souveraine. +Son architecture est nette : une arcalité fondée sur des unités +d'équivalence socialement reconnues ; une cratialité exercée par des +médiateurs capables de garantir la recevabilité pratique des engagements +; une archicration située dans les scènes où la valeur est contestée, +rejouée et ajustée sans que leur validité première repose sur une +autorité transcendante ou souveraine. -Ce qui fait sa singularité profonde, c’est qu’il produit de la co-viabilité non par commandement, ni par révélation, ni par démonstration, mais par exposition réglée d’une valeur discutable. Le lien marchand ne tient que parce qu’il peut être repris, pesé, arbitré, reconnu à nouveau dans la scène même où il vacille. En ce sens, le marché n’est pas seulement un mode de circulation des biens ; il constitue, dans certaines configurations historiques, une grammaire autonome de régulation des engagements. +Ce qui fait sa singularité profonde, c'est qu'il produit de la +co-viabilité non par commandement, ni par révélation, ni par +démonstration, mais par exposition réglée d'une valeur discutable. Le +lien marchand ne tient que parce qu'il peut être repris, pesé, arbitré, +reconnu à nouveau dans la scène même où il vacille. En ce sens, le +marché n'est pas seulement un mode de circulation des biens ; il +constitue, dans certaines configurations historiques, une grammaire +autonome de régulation des engagements. -Il montre ainsi qu’une société peut tenir non seulement par la loi, par la croyance, par la mémoire ou par le savoir, mais aussi par la capacité à instituer des scènes où l’accord demeure possible entre des acteurs qui ne partagent ni position, ni intérêt, ni statut identique. Le marché, sous cette forme archicratique, n’est pas simplement une mécanique de circulation ; il est une épreuve réglée de la coexistence entre étrangers relatifs. Il rend possible une forme spécifique de liaison sociale, fondée non sur la communion, mais sur la comparabilité négociée des engagements. En cela, il révèle une dimension essentielle de la co-viabilité : la possibilité de faire tenir ensemble des acteurs distincts sans exiger d’eux une adhésion commune à autre chose qu’à la scène même de l’ajustement. +Il montre ainsi qu'une société peut tenir non seulement par la loi, par +la croyance, par la mémoire ou par le savoir, mais aussi par la capacité +à instituer des scènes où l'accord demeure possible entre des acteurs +qui ne partagent ni position, ni intérêt, ni statut identique. Le +marché, sous cette forme archicratique, n'est pas simplement une +mécanique de circulation ; il est une épreuve réglée de la coexistence +entre étrangers relatifs. Il rend possible une forme spécifique de +liaison sociale, fondée non sur la communion, mais sur la comparabilité +négociée des engagements. En cela, il révèle une dimension essentielle +de la co-viabilité : la possibilité de faire tenir ensemble des acteurs +distincts sans exiger d'eux une adhésion commune à autre chose qu'à la +scène même de l'ajustement. -Sous ce rapport, le régime marchand fait apparaître une propriété essentielle de l’archicratie en général : un monde commun peut aussi se soutenir par des dispositifs qui n’exigent ni adhésion doctrinale, ni fusion symbolique, ni centralité souveraine, mais seulement la possibilité organisée de rendre des engagements mutuellement recevables. La scène marchande rappelle ainsi que la co-viabilité n’est pas toujours affaire de communion ; elle peut relever d’une compatibilité construite entre acteurs séparés, d’un art de faire tenir la distance elle-même. Il montre ainsi qu’un ordre peut émerger non de l’effacement des différences, mais de leur mise en relation réglée dans un espace d’équivalence contestable. +Sous ce rapport, le régime marchand fait apparaître une propriété +essentielle de l'archicratie en général : un monde commun peut aussi se +soutenir par des dispositifs qui n'exigent ni adhésion doctrinale, ni +fusion symbolique, ni centralité souveraine, mais seulement la +possibilité organisée de rendre des engagements mutuellement recevables. +La scène marchande rappelle ainsi que la co-viabilité n'est pas toujours +affaire de communion ; elle peut relever d'une compatibilité construite +entre acteurs séparés, d'un art de faire tenir la distance elle-même. Il +montre ainsi qu'un ordre peut émerger non de l'effacement des +différences, mais de leur mise en relation réglée dans un espace +d'équivalence contestable. -Mais cette grammaire transactionnelle ne peut suffire à épuiser toutes les formes de mise à l’épreuve du lien social. Là où l’équivalence ne peut plus être reconnue, d’autres scènes s’ouvrent, dans lesquelles ce n’est plus la valeur qui se négocie, mais l’appartenance, l’alliance, la vulnérabilité et l’exposition des corps. C’est à cette autre forme de régulation, non marchande mais néanmoins archicratique, que sera consacrée la sous-section suivante : celle des archicrations guerrières. +Mais cette grammaire transactionnelle ne peut suffire à épuiser toutes +les formes de mise à l'épreuve du lien social. Là où l'équivalence ne +peut plus être reconnue, d'autres scènes s'ouvrent, dans lesquelles ce +n'est plus la valeur qui se négocie, mais l'appartenance, l'alliance, la +vulnérabilité et l'exposition des corps. C'est à cette autre forme de +régulation, non marchande mais néanmoins archicratique, que sera +consacrée la sous-section suivante : celle des archicrations guerrières. -Le tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe du présent chapitre. +Le tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe du +présent chapitre. ### 2.2.12 — *Archicrations guerrières* -La guerre, dans l’économie archicratique des régimes de co-viabilité, ne peut être réduite ni à un pur fait de destruction, ni à une stratégie d’État, ni à une simple explosion de violence. Dans certaines configurations historiques, elle constitue au contraire une scène régulée d’épreuve, où l’exposition du corps, la bravoure reconnue, la loyauté manifestée et la mise en forme codifiée du conflit deviennent des opérateurs d’ordre. Nous désignons ici par archicration guerrière le méta-régime dans lequel l’affrontement, loin de suspendre toute régulation, devient lui-même principe de différenciation, de reconnaissance et de tenue du lien collectif dès lors que l’épreuve combattante y vaut comme opérateur propre de validation des places et des appartenances. +La guerre, dans l'économie archicratique des régimes de co-viabilité, ne +peut être réduite ni à un pur fait de destruction, ni à une stratégie +d'État, ni à une simple explosion de violence. Dans certaines +configurations historiques, elle constitue au contraire une scène +régulée d'épreuve, où l'exposition du corps, la bravoure reconnue, la +loyauté manifestée et la mise en forme codifiée du conflit deviennent +des opérateurs d'ordre. Nous désignons ici par archicration guerrière le +méta-régime dans lequel l'affrontement, loin de suspendre toute +régulation, devient lui-même principe de différenciation, de +reconnaissance et de tenue du lien collectif dès lors que l'épreuve +combattante y vaut comme opérateur propre de validation des places et +des appartenances. -Ce régime ne doit pas être confondu avec la guerre étatique moderne, bureaucratisée et centralisée, ni avec la violence de prédation sans règle. Il désigne une configuration plus ancienne et plus spécifique, dans laquelle le combat vaut comme épreuve socialement reconnue, capable de distribuer les statuts, de confirmer les appartenances, de régler certains différends et d’exposer publiquement les qualités requises pour tenir une place dans le collectif. L’ordre n’y procède pas en premier lieu d’une loi générale, d’une révélation ou d’une démonstration, mais d’une reconnaissance acquise dans et par l’épreuve. +Ce régime ne doit pas être confondu avec la guerre étatique moderne, +bureaucratisée et centralisée, ni avec la violence de prédation sans +règle. Il désigne une configuration plus ancienne et plus spécifique, +dans laquelle le combat vaut comme épreuve socialement reconnue, capable +de distribuer les statuts, de confirmer les appartenances, de régler +certains différends et d'exposer publiquement les qualités requises pour +tenir une place dans le collectif. L'ordre n'y procède pas en premier +lieu d'une loi générale, d'une révélation ou d'une démonstration, mais +d'une reconnaissance acquise dans et par l'épreuve. -L’arcalité propre à ce régime repose ainsi sur une matrice de distinction fondée sur l’exposition réglée du corps au danger. Ce qui y fait fondement n’est ni la victoire brute, ni l’anéantissement de l’ennemi, mais la possibilité d’être reconnu comme ayant tenu l’épreuve selon des formes admises. Marques corporelles, armes personnelles, trophées, insignes, chants de gloire, noms d’honneur, récits de bataille et signes d’appartenance ne relèvent pas ici du simple décor : ils constituent les supports matériels et symboliques d’une reconnaissance statutaire indexée à la bravoure, à la loyauté et à l’endurance. +L'arcalité propre à ce régime repose ainsi sur une matrice de +distinction fondée sur l'exposition réglée du corps au danger. Ce qui y +fait fondement n'est ni la victoire brute, ni l'anéantissement de +l'ennemi, mais la possibilité d'être reconnu comme ayant tenu l'épreuve +selon des formes admises. Marques corporelles, armes personnelles, +trophées, insignes, chants de gloire, noms d'honneur, récits de bataille +et signes d'appartenance ne relèvent pas ici du simple décor : ils +constituent les supports matériels et symboliques d'une reconnaissance +statutaire indexée à la bravoure, à la loyauté et à l'endurance. -Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d’en saisir la logique. Dans la chevalerie médiévale, le blason, l’adoubement, l’épée ou la participation reconnue à la mêlée ne valent pas seulement comme signes nobiliaires : ils situent l’individu dans un ordre d’honneur où la reconnaissance dépend de l’épreuve affrontée. Dans la Grèce archaïque et hoplitique, l’aptitude à tenir sa place dans la phalange lie étroitement exposition combattante et appartenance civique. Dans d’autres contextes encore, qu’il s’agisse de sociétés lignagères africaines ou du Japon féodal, armes consacrées, marques corporelles, emblèmes de clan et récits de bravoure opèrent de manière comparable : ils identifient moins celui qui a simplement vaincu que celui qui a été jugé digne de porter, par son engagement, une part du lien collectif. +Plusieurs configurations historiques permettent d'en saisir la logique. +Dans la chevalerie médiévale, le blason, l'adoubement, l'épée ou la +participation reconnue à la mêlée ne valent pas seulement comme signes +nobiliaires : ils situent l'individu dans un ordre d'honneur où la +reconnaissance dépend de l'épreuve affrontée. Dans la Grèce archaïque et +hoplitique, l'aptitude à tenir sa place dans la phalange lie étroitement +exposition combattante et appartenance civique. Dans d'autres contextes +encore, qu'il s'agisse de sociétés lignagères africaines ou du Japon +féodal, armes consacrées, marques corporelles, emblèmes de clan et +récits de bravoure opèrent de manière comparable : ils identifient moins +celui qui a simplement vaincu que celui qui a été jugé digne de porter, +par son engagement, une part du lien collectif. -L’arcalité guerrière ne doit donc pas être comprise comme une simple valorisation culturelle du combat. Elle constitue une forme spécifique de fondation pratique : non par prescription, non par récit, non par vérité révélée, mais par institution d’un ordre de reconnaissance dans lequel l’épreuve combattante devient principe de différenciation légitime. Ce qui compte n’est pas seulement l’existence de la violence, mais la manière dont celle-ci est rendue visible, lisible et socialement interprétable comme support de statut. En ce sens, la guerre n’est archicratique que lorsqu’elle cesse d’être chaos pour devenir scène réglée d’exposition, de validation et de reconnaissance. +L'arcalité guerrière ne doit donc pas être comprise comme une simple +valorisation culturelle du combat. Elle constitue une forme spécifique +de fondation pratique : non par prescription, non par récit, non par +vérité révélée, mais par institution d'un ordre de reconnaissance dans +lequel l'épreuve combattante devient principe de différenciation +légitime. Ce qui compte n'est pas seulement l'existence de la violence, +mais la manière dont celle-ci est rendue visible, lisible et socialement +interprétable comme support de statut. En ce sens, la guerre n'est +archicratique que lorsqu'elle cesse d'être chaos pour devenir scène +réglée d'exposition, de validation et de reconnaissance. -C’est en ce point que le méta-régime guerrier se distingue des autres formes de conflictualité codifiée. Il ne suffit pas qu’un affrontement soit réglé, limité ou symboliquement encadré pour qu’il devienne archicratiquement guerrier. Il faut encore que la validité de l’appartenance, du statut ou de l’autorité y procède en dernier ressort de la reconnaissance acquise dans l’épreuve elle-même. Là où d’autres régimes utilisent le conflit comme instrument secondaire d’une norme, d’un ordre sacral ou d’un appareil politique, le régime guerrier fait de l’épreuve combattante un opérateur propre de validité et de tenue du lien collectif. +C'est en ce point que le méta-régime guerrier se distingue des autres +formes de conflictualité codifiée. Il ne suffit pas qu'un affrontement +soit réglé, limité ou symboliquement encadré pour qu'il devienne +archicratiquement guerrier. Il faut encore que la validité de +l'appartenance, du statut ou de l'autorité y procède en dernier ressort +de la reconnaissance acquise dans l'épreuve elle-même. Là où d'autres +régimes utilisent le conflit comme instrument secondaire d'une norme, +d'un ordre sacral ou d'un appareil politique, le régime guerrier fait de +l'épreuve combattante un opérateur propre de validité et de tenue du +lien collectif. -Le régime archicratique guerrier se distingue par une forme d’autorité irréductible aux modèles normatifs, théologiques ou bureaucratiques. La cratialité n’y procède ni d’un texte, ni d’une fonction, ni d’une délégation stable : elle s’éprouve dans et par l’engagement corporel au sein de la scène d’épreuve. L’autorité guerrière est ainsi fondamentalement agonistique. Elle ne se possède pas, elle se démontre ; elle ne se transmet pas comme un titre, elle se maintient par la capacité à être reconnue dans l’épreuve. +Le régime archicratique guerrier se distingue par une forme d'autorité +irréductible aux modèles normatifs, théologiques ou bureaucratiques. La +cratialité n'y procède ni d'un texte, ni d'une fonction, ni d'une +délégation stable : elle s'éprouve dans et par l'engagement corporel au +sein de la scène d'épreuve. L'autorité guerrière est ainsi +fondamentalement agonistique. Elle ne se possède pas, elle se démontre ; +elle ne se transmet pas comme un titre, elle se maintient par la +capacité à être reconnue dans l'épreuve. -Cette propriété permet de distinguer le guerrier non seulement du normativo-politique, mais aussi des formes sacrales ou étatiques qui peuvent encadrer la violence sans en faire le lieu premier de la reconnaissance. Lorsque le combat vaut d’abord comme exécution d’un ordre, accomplissement d’un devoir transcendant ou application d’une décision souveraine, l’affrontement peut demeurer violent et réglé sans constituer pour autant un méta-régime guerrier autonome. Celui-ci n’apparaît pleinement que lorsque l’exposition reconnue au risque demeure le principe principal de validation des positions et des appartenances. +Cette propriété permet de distinguer le guerrier non seulement du +normativo-politique, mais aussi des formes sacrales ou étatiques qui +peuvent encadrer la violence sans en faire le lieu premier de la +reconnaissance. Lorsque le combat vaut d'abord comme exécution d'un +ordre, accomplissement d'un devoir transcendant ou application d'une +décision souveraine, l'affrontement peut demeurer violent et réglé sans +constituer pour autant un méta-régime guerrier autonome. Celui-ci +n'apparaît pleinement que lorsque l'exposition reconnue au risque +demeure le principe principal de validation des positions et des +appartenances. -Les figures qui incarnent cette cratialité — chefs de guerre, capitaines, champions, anciens combattants reconnus — ne tirent leur légitimité ni d’un mandat abstrait, ni d’un savoir spécialisé, mais de la reconnaissance collective de leur capacité à exposer leur corps, à tenir leur place dans le combat et à assumer la responsabilité du conflit. Leur autorité est conditionnelle : elle vaut tant qu’elle peut être réactivée, confirmée ou, du moins, reconnue comme effectivement éprouvée. +Les figures qui incarnent cette cratialité — chefs de guerre, +capitaines, champions, anciens combattants reconnus — ne tirent leur +légitimité ni d'un mandat abstrait, ni d'un savoir spécialisé, mais de +la reconnaissance collective de leur capacité à exposer leur corps, à +tenir leur place dans le combat et à assumer la responsabilité du +conflit. Leur autorité est conditionnelle : elle vaut tant qu'elle peut +être réactivée, confirmée ou, du moins, reconnue comme effectivement +éprouvée. -Dans diverses configurations historiques, cette logique se retrouve sous des formes différenciées mais convergentes. Dans les mondes hoplitiques, la capacité à commander est indexée à la participation effective à la ligne de combat ; dans les univers chevaleresques, l’autorité procède de la bravoure reconnue et de la fidélité éprouvée dans l’affrontement ; dans d’autres contextes lignagers ou segmentaires, les titres guerriers sont liés à des performances attestées, susceptibles d’être contestées ou retirées. Dans tous ces cas, l’autorité ne précède pas l’épreuve : elle en résulte. +Dans diverses configurations historiques, cette logique se retrouve sous +des formes différenciées mais convergentes. Dans les mondes hoplitiques, +la capacité à commander est indexée à la participation effective à la +ligne de combat ; dans les univers chevaleresques, l'autorité procède de +la bravoure reconnue et de la fidélité éprouvée dans l'affrontement ; +dans d'autres contextes lignagers ou segmentaires, les titres guerriers +sont liés à des performances attestées, susceptibles d'être contestées +ou retirées. Dans tous ces cas, l'autorité ne précède pas l'épreuve : +elle en résulte. -Cette cratialité présente ainsi une propriété décisive : elle est à la fois intense et précaire. Intense, parce qu’elle engage directement la vie, le courage et la capacité à porter le lien collectif dans des situations limites ; précaire, parce qu’elle peut être remise en cause dès lors que l’épreuve n’est plus assumée, reconnue ou jugée conforme. Le chef qui refuse le combat, qui échoue à tenir son rang ou qui trahit les règles implicites de l’affrontement peut perdre sa légitimité sans qu’aucune procédure formelle ne soit nécessaire. +Cette cratialité présente ainsi une propriété décisive : elle est à la +fois intense et précaire. Intense, parce qu'elle engage directement la +vie, le courage et la capacité à porter le lien collectif dans des +situations limites ; précaire, parce qu'elle peut être remise en cause +dès lors que l'épreuve n'est plus assumée, reconnue ou jugée conforme. +Le chef qui refuse le combat, qui échoue à tenir son rang ou qui trahit +les règles implicites de l'affrontement peut perdre sa légitimité sans +qu'aucune procédure formelle ne soit nécessaire. -Il faut enfin souligner que cette autorité ne se confond pas avec la simple domination violente. Elle suppose au contraire une reconnaissance partagée des formes légitimes de l’épreuve : respect de certaines limites, identification des adversaires, lisibilité des engagements. La cratialité guerrière ne consiste pas à imposer la force, mais à rendre la force reconnaissable comme légitime dans un cadre donné. C’est cette reconnaissance — toujours fragile, toujours exposée — qui permet à la violence de ne pas basculer dans la pure prédation, mais de demeurer, au moins partiellement, intégrée à un ordre de co-viabilité. +Il faut enfin souligner que cette autorité ne se confond pas avec la +simple domination violente. Elle suppose au contraire une reconnaissance +partagée des formes légitimes de l'épreuve : respect de certaines +limites, identification des adversaires, lisibilité des engagements. La +cratialité guerrière ne consiste pas à imposer la force, mais à rendre +la force reconnaissable comme légitime dans un cadre donné. C'est cette +reconnaissance — toujours fragile, toujours exposée — qui permet à +la violence de ne pas basculer dans la pure prédation, mais de demeurer, +au moins partiellement, intégrée à un ordre de co-viabilité. -La spécificité du méta-régime guerrier se révèle pleinement dans sa forme d’archicration, c’est-à-dire dans la manière dont le différend est exposé, traversé et reconnu à travers une épreuve corporelle réglée. Ici, la régulation ne procède ni d’une norme abstraite, ni d’une autorité doctrinale, ni d’une délibération : elle advient dans la scène même de l’affrontement, dès lors que celui-ci est reconnu comme cadre légitime de mise à l’épreuve. +La spécificité du méta-régime guerrier se révèle pleinement dans sa +forme d'archicration, c'est-à-dire dans la manière dont le différend est +exposé, traversé et reconnu à travers une épreuve corporelle réglée. +Ici, la régulation ne procède ni d'une norme abstraite, ni d'une +autorité doctrinale, ni d'une délibération : elle advient dans la scène +même de l'affrontement, dès lors que celui-ci est reconnu comme cadre +légitime de mise à l'épreuve. -L’archicration guerrière ne consiste donc pas à supprimer le conflit, mais à lui donner une forme telle qu’il puisse produire de la reconnaissance. Le différend n’est pas évacué : il est assumé, concentré et rendu visible dans une configuration codifiée où les acteurs engagent leur corps, leur statut et leur parole. Ce qui est alors en jeu n’est pas la vérité d’une position, mais la validité d’une présence dans l’épreuve. +L'archicration guerrière ne consiste donc pas à supprimer le conflit, +mais à lui donner une forme telle qu'il puisse produire de la +reconnaissance. Le différend n'est pas évacué : il est assumé, concentré +et rendu visible dans une configuration codifiée où les acteurs engagent +leur corps, leur statut et leur parole. Ce qui est alors en jeu n'est +pas la vérité d'une position, mais la validité d'une présence dans +l'épreuve. -Dans diverses configurations historiques, cette logique se manifeste sous des formes convergentes : duel réglé, affrontement ritualisé, combat encadré par des règles partagées. Dans tous les cas, l’épreuve n’est légitime que si elle respecte une grammaire reconnue : identification des adversaires, limitation des armes ou des gestes, présence de témoins ou de tiers, possibilité d’une issue reconnue comme décisive. Ce n’est pas la violence brute qui tranche, mais la conformité de l’affrontement à une forme admissible. +Dans diverses configurations historiques, cette logique se manifeste +sous des formes convergentes : duel réglé, affrontement ritualisé, +combat encadré par des règles partagées. Dans tous les cas, l'épreuve +n'est légitime que si elle respecte une grammaire reconnue : +identification des adversaires, limitation des armes ou des gestes, +présence de témoins ou de tiers, possibilité d'une issue reconnue comme +décisive. Ce n'est pas la violence brute qui tranche, mais la conformité +de l'affrontement à une forme admissible. -La scène d’archicration guerrière possède ainsi une propriété fondamentale : elle transforme l’incertitude du conflit en opérateur de régulation. L’issue est incertaine, mais cette incertitude elle-même est intégrée dans la structure du lien. Le combat ne garantit pas la justice au sens normatif, mais il produit une décision recevable parce qu’elle a été exposée, partagée et reconnue dans une épreuve commune. +La scène d'archicration guerrière possède ainsi une propriété +fondamentale : elle transforme l'incertitude du conflit en opérateur de +régulation. L'issue est incertaine, mais cette incertitude elle-même est +intégrée dans la structure du lien. Le combat ne garantit pas la justice +au sens normatif, mais il produit une décision recevable parce qu'elle a +été exposée, partagée et reconnue dans une épreuve commune. -Il en résulte une configuration singulière de la co-viabilité. Celle-ci ne repose pas sur l’élimination de la violence, mais sur sa mise en forme. L’adversaire n’est pas simplement un ennemi à détruire : il est un partenaire d’épreuve sans lequel aucune reconnaissance ne serait possible. Le lien social ne se maintient pas malgré le conflit, mais à travers lui, dès lors que celui-ci demeure encadré par des formes qui en rendent l’issue intelligible et acceptable. +Il en résulte une configuration singulière de la co-viabilité. Celle-ci +ne repose pas sur l'élimination de la violence, mais sur sa mise en +forme. L'adversaire n'est pas simplement un ennemi à détruire : il est +un partenaire d'épreuve sans lequel aucune reconnaissance ne serait +possible. Le lien social ne se maintient pas malgré le conflit, mais à +travers lui, dès lors que celui-ci demeure encadré par des formes qui en +rendent l'issue intelligible et acceptable. -L’archicration guerrière se définit ainsi comme une scène où le corps fait preuve, où l’épreuve tranche, et où la reconnaissance résulte de l’exposition partagée au risque. Elle ne décide pas par argument, elle ne valide pas par conformité, elle ne garantit pas par autorité externe : elle fait apparaître, dans l’intensité même de l’affrontement, ce qui peut être tenu pour valable dans l’ordre du lien. +L'archicration guerrière se définit ainsi comme une scène où le corps +fait preuve, où l'épreuve tranche, et où la reconnaissance résulte de +l'exposition partagée au risque. Elle ne décide pas par argument, elle +ne valide pas par conformité, elle ne garantit pas par autorité externe +: elle fait apparaître, dans l'intensité même de l'affrontement, ce qui +peut être tenu pour valable dans l'ordre du lien. -Le méta-régime guerrier, ainsi compris, ne vise pas d’abord la destruction, mais la structuration du lien dans et par la conflictualité assumée. Là où d’autres régimes tentent de pacifier le désaccord (en l’effaçant, en le fixant, en le codifiant), l’*archicration guerrière* l’expose comme moment fondateur du lien, à condition que cette exposition soit encadrée, ritualisée, située dans une scène reconnue. Sans règle, il y a violence. Mais la règle, à elle seule, ne suffit pas à faire du conflit un opérateur de reconnaissance : il faut encore que l’épreuve demeure visible, risquée, codifiée et socialement lisible comme scène où se jouent effectivement le statut, l’honneur, l’autorité ou l’appartenance. C’est à cette condition que le conflit peut devenir opérateur de reconnaissance. +Le méta-régime guerrier, ainsi compris, ne vise pas d'abord la +destruction, mais la structuration du lien dans et par la conflictualité +assumée. Là où d'autres régimes tentent de pacifier le désaccord (en +l'effaçant, en le fixant, en le codifiant), l'*archicration guerrière* +l'expose comme moment fondateur du lien, à condition que cette +exposition soit encadrée, ritualisée, située dans une scène reconnue. +Sans règle, il y a violence. Mais la règle, à elle seule, ne suffit pas +à faire du conflit un opérateur de reconnaissance : il faut encore que +l'épreuve demeure visible, risquée, codifiée et socialement lisible +comme scène où se jouent effectivement le statut, l'honneur, l'autorité +ou l'appartenance. C'est à cette condition que le conflit peut devenir +opérateur de reconnaissance. -Comme tout méta-régime, l’archicration guerrière connaît ses fragilités. Elle se désactive lorsque l’épreuve cesse d’être une scène reconnue de régulation pour devenir soit destruction sans forme, soit simple instrument d’un autre ordre. Le régime guerrier ne tient en effet qu’à une condition stricte : que le conflit demeure codifié, visible, limité et socialement lisible comme épreuve de reconnaissance. +Comme tout méta-régime, l'archicration guerrière connaît ses fragilités. +Elle se désactive lorsque l'épreuve cesse d'être une scène reconnue de +régulation pour devenir soit destruction sans forme, soit simple +instrument d'un autre ordre. Le régime guerrier ne tient en effet qu'à +une condition stricte : que le conflit demeure codifié, visible, limité +et socialement lisible comme épreuve de reconnaissance. -Cette exigence de codification ne doit toutefois pas être confondue avec les formes modernes de juridicisation de la guerre, telles que les conventions encadrant les conflits armés ou le droit international humanitaire. Ces dernières relèvent principalement d’une logique normativo-politique : elles visent à limiter la violence par l’énonciation de règles générales opposables, indépendamment de la reconnaissance acquise dans l’épreuve elle-même. À l’inverse, les codes proprement guerriers — qu’ils prennent la forme de disciplines martiales, de règles d’honneur ou de conventions d’engagement — n’ont de portée archicratique que lorsqu’ils structurent une scène dans laquelle l’exposition au risque vaut comme fondement de statut, d’autorité et d’appartenance. La simple existence de règles de guerre ne suffit donc pas à constituer un méta-régime guerrier ; encore faut-il que ces règles organisent effectivement une épreuve reconnue comme décisive. +Cette exigence de codification ne doit toutefois pas être confondue avec +les formes modernes de juridicisation de la guerre, telles que les +conventions encadrant les conflits armés ou le droit international +humanitaire. Ces dernières relèvent principalement d'une logique +normativo-politique : elles visent à limiter la violence par +l'énonciation de règles générales opposables, indépendamment de la +reconnaissance acquise dans l'épreuve elle-même. À l'inverse, les codes +proprement guerriers — qu'ils prennent la forme de disciplines +martiales, de règles d'honneur ou de conventions d'engagement — n'ont +de portée archicratique que lorsqu'ils structurent une scène dans +laquelle l'exposition au risque vaut comme fondement de statut, +d'autorité et d'appartenance. La simple existence de règles de guerre ne +suffit donc pas à constituer un méta-régime guerrier ; encore faut-il +que ces règles organisent effectivement une épreuve reconnue comme +décisive. -Si l’un de ces termes manque, la conflictualité peut subsister, parfois même avec une grande intensité, sans pour autant produire la reconnaissance qui définit ce méta-régime. Une violence réglée n’est donc pas encore, en elle-même, une archicration guerrière ; elle ne le devient que lorsqu’elle vaut comme scène décisive de validation des places, des qualités et des appartenances. +Si l'un de ces termes manque, la conflictualité peut subsister, parfois +même avec une grande intensité, sans pour autant produire la +reconnaissance qui définit ce méta-régime. Une violence réglée n'est +donc pas encore, en elle-même, une archicration guerrière ; elle ne le +devient que lorsqu'elle vaut comme scène décisive de validation des +places, des qualités et des appartenances. -Plusieurs dérives principales peuvent alors être distinguées. La première est la sacralisation du combat. Dès lors que l’affrontement cesse d’opposer des adversaires reconnus dans une scène réglée pour devenir mission transcendante, purification ou guerre sainte, l’ennemi n’est plus un pair d’épreuve mais une figure à éliminer. La guerre quitte alors le registre agonistique pour entrer dans un autre régime de légitimation. +Plusieurs dérives principales peuvent alors être distinguées. La +première est la sacralisation du combat. Dès lors que l'affrontement +cesse d'opposer des adversaires reconnus dans une scène réglée pour +devenir mission transcendante, purification ou guerre sainte, l'ennemi +n'est plus un pair d'épreuve mais une figure à éliminer. La guerre +quitte alors le registre agonistique pour entrer dans un autre régime de +légitimation. -La deuxième dérive est la bureaucratisation ou l’étatisation du commandement. Lorsque l’autorité militaire ne procède plus de l’épreuve reconnue, mais du grade, de l’office, de la nomination ou de l’appareil de commandement, la cratialité guerrière se défait. Le chef n’est plus celui qui s’expose et se fait reconnaître dans l’épreuve, mais celui qui occupe une fonction. L’ordre du combat devient alors administration de la violence plutôt que scène de reconnaissance. +La deuxième dérive est la bureaucratisation ou l'étatisation du +commandement. Lorsque l'autorité militaire ne procède plus de l'épreuve +reconnue, mais du grade, de l'office, de la nomination ou de l'appareil +de commandement, la cratialité guerrière se défait. Le chef n'est plus +celui qui s'expose et se fait reconnaître dans l'épreuve, mais celui qui +occupe une fonction. L'ordre du combat devient alors administration de +la violence plutôt que scène de reconnaissance. -La troisième dérive est la professionnalisation mercenaire. Lorsque le combattant n’est plus engagé comme porteur d’un statut, d’une appartenance ou d’un honneur, mais comme prestataire de force, l’épreuve perd sa fonction régulatrice. Le conflit subsiste, parfois même s’intensifie, mais il ne produit plus de co-viabilité : il devient service, prédation ou simple instrument. +La troisième dérive est la professionnalisation mercenaire. Lorsque le +combattant n'est plus engagé comme porteur d'un statut, d'une +appartenance ou d'un honneur, mais comme prestataire de force, l'épreuve +perd sa fonction régulatrice. Le conflit subsiste, parfois même +s'intensifie, mais il ne produit plus de co-viabilité : il devient +service, prédation ou simple instrument. -Une quatrième dérive tient à la spectacularisation du combat. Dès lors que l’épreuve demeure visible mais n’est plus réellement risquée ni décisive, elle se déplace vers la représentation. Tournois vidés de leur enjeu, bravoure stylisée, gestes héroïques devenus pur cérémonial : l’archicration guerrière s’esthétise et perd sa puissance de validation. Ce n’est plus l’épreuve qui fonde la reconnaissance, mais son image. +Une quatrième dérive tient à la spectacularisation du combat. Dès lors +que l'épreuve demeure visible mais n'est plus réellement risquée ni +décisive, elle se déplace vers la représentation. Tournois vidés de leur +enjeu, bravoure stylisée, gestes héroïques devenus pur cérémonial : +l'archicration guerrière s'esthétise et perd sa puissance de validation. +Ce n'est plus l'épreuve qui fonde la reconnaissance, mais son image. -Ces dérives n’abolissent pas nécessairement toute conflictualité, mais elles retirent au régime guerrier sa spécificité archicratique. Pour que celui-ci demeure effectif, il faut que l’épreuve reste codifiée sans être neutralisée, risquée sans être anarchique, reconnue sans être absorbée par un ordre supérieur. Lorsque l’un de ces termes se défait, la guerre subsiste peut-être, mais elle cesse d’opérer comme scène de co-viabilité. +Ces dérives n'abolissent pas nécessairement toute conflictualité, mais +elles retirent au régime guerrier sa spécificité archicratique. Pour que +celui-ci demeure effectif, il faut que l'épreuve reste codifiée sans +être neutralisée, risquée sans être anarchique, reconnue sans être +absorbée par un ordre supérieur. Lorsque l'un de ces termes se défait, +la guerre subsiste peut-être, mais elle cesse d'opérer comme scène de +co-viabilité. -L’archicration guerrière repose sur une scène d’épreuve où l’honneur est visible, le courage attestable, la gloire atteignable et l’autorité réversible. C’est ce régime que nous avons voulu restituer ici — non pour en faire l’apologie, mais pour en révéler la logique propre, sa structure spécifique et sa place irréductible dans la grammaire générale des formes de pouvoir régulateur. Un tableau de synthèse de ce méta-régime est présenté en annexe du présent chapitre. +L'archicration guerrière repose sur une scène d'épreuve où l'honneur est +visible, le courage attestable, la gloire atteignable et l'autorité +réversible. C'est ce régime que nous avons voulu restituer ici — non +pour en faire l'apologie, mais pour en révéler la logique propre, sa +structure spécifique et sa place irréductible dans la grammaire générale +des formes de pouvoir régulateur. Un tableau de synthèse de ce +méta-régime est présenté en annexe du présent chapitre. -La co-viabilité par combat ne signifie pas que toute société doive s’y soumettre : elle signifie seulement que certaines sociétés ont institué le conflit comme mode d’appartenance, non comme exception, et qu’elles ont su, parfois, en faire un opérateur d’ordre — à condition d’en maîtriser la scène, le code et le geste. +La co-viabilité par combat ne signifie pas que toute société doive s'y +soumettre : elle signifie seulement que certaines sociétés ont institué +le conflit comme mode d'appartenance, non comme exception, et qu'elles +ont su, parfois, en faire un opérateur d'ordre — à condition d'en +maîtriser la scène, le code et le geste. ### 2.2.13 — *Archicrations différentielles* et formes hybrides -Arrivés au terme de notre archéotypologie des méta-régimes, une précaution méthodologique s’impose. Les douze régimes précédemment reconstruits ne doivent pas être compris comme des formes chimiquement pures, toujours isolables dans l’expérience historique, ni comme des unités closes se déployant chacune dans l’autosuffisance de leur cohérence propre. Ils constituent des pôles d’intelligibilité indispensables ; mais les configurations concrètes de co-viabilité se présentent rarement sous la forme d’un seul régime intégralement stabilisé. +Arrivés au terme de notre archéotypologie des méta-régimes, une +précaution méthodologique s'impose. Les douze régimes précédemment +reconstruits ne doivent pas être compris comme des formes chimiquement +pures, toujours isolables dans l'expérience historique, ni comme des +unités closes se déployant chacune dans l'autosuffisance de leur +cohérence propre. Ils constituent des pôles d'intelligibilité +indispensables ; mais les configurations concrètes de co-viabilité se +présentent rarement sous la forme d'un seul régime intégralement +stabilisé. -Il faut donc reconnaître, à côté des méta-régimes archicratiques proprement dits, l’existence de formes composites qui ne relèvent ni d’un treizième régime pur, ni d’une simple anomalie empirique. Certaines sont différentielles : un même régime y opère de manière discontinue, alternée, inhibée, saisonnière ou stratifiée. D’autres sont hybrides : plusieurs régimes y sont articulés dans une même configuration historique, sans fusion synthétique complète. Ces formes n’abolissent pas la typologie ; elles en manifestent au contraire la plasticité concrète. +Il faut donc reconnaître, à côté des méta-régimes archicratiques +proprement dits, l'existence de formes composites qui ne relèvent ni +d'un treizième régime pur, ni d'une simple anomalie empirique. Certaines +sont différentielles : un même régime y opère de manière discontinue, +alternée, inhibée, saisonnière ou stratifiée. D'autres sont hybrides : +plusieurs régimes y sont articulés dans une même configuration +historique, sans fusion synthétique complète. Ces formes n'abolissent +pas la typologie ; elles en manifestent au contraire la plasticité +concrète. -La présente sous-section a donc une fonction précise. Elle n’ajoute pas un nouveau méta-régime à la série ; elle examine les modes selon lesquels les régimes déjà dégagés se modulent, se combinent, se parasitent ou se relaient dans les sociétés effectives. Il ne s’agira pas ici de brouiller les distinctions établies, mais de montrer comment la co-viabilité historique se forme souvent dans l’entre-deux des régimes purs : par alternance, par inhibition, par tressage, par composition instable. +La présente sous-section a donc une fonction précise. Elle n'ajoute pas +un nouveau méta-régime à la série ; elle examine les modes selon +lesquels les régimes déjà dégagés se modulent, se combinent, se +parasitent ou se relaient dans les sociétés effectives. Il ne s'agira +pas ici de brouiller les distinctions établies, mais de montrer comment +la co-viabilité historique se forme souvent dans l'entre-deux des +régimes purs : par alternance, par inhibition, par tressage, par +composition instable. -Nous distinguerons ainsi deux grandes familles de cas. Les formes différentielles désignent les situations où la régulation procède d’une modulation interne d’un régime donné : intériorisation, intermittence, suspension, variation cyclique ou passage générationnel. Les formes hybrides désignent les configurations où plusieurs logiques archicratiques se trouvent effectivement entrelacées dans une même scène sociale : coercition et capital, transmission et discipline, jeu et norme, domesticité et hiérarchie, écologie rituelle et symbolisation collective. Dans les deux cas, l’enjeu reste identique : comprendre comment l’archicration se déploie lorsqu’elle ne se présente plus sous la figure d’un régime simple, mais sous celle d’un montage partiel, mobile ou stratifié. +Nous distinguerons ainsi deux grandes familles de cas. Les formes +différentielles désignent les situations où la régulation procède d'une +modulation interne d'un régime donné : intériorisation, intermittence, +suspension, variation cyclique ou passage générationnel. Les formes +hybrides désignent les configurations où plusieurs logiques +archicratiques se trouvent effectivement entrelacées dans une même scène +sociale : coercition et capital, transmission et discipline, jeu et +norme, domesticité et hiérarchie, écologie rituelle et symbolisation +collective. Dans les deux cas, l'enjeu reste identique : comprendre +comment l'archicration se déploie lorsqu'elle ne se présente plus sous +la figure d'un régime simple, mais sous celle d'un montage partiel, +mobile ou stratifié. -Cette dernière sous-section de 2.2 doit donc être lue comme une zone de flexion de la typologie, non comme son abandon. Elle marque le passage entre la reconstruction des formes fondamentales de régulation et leur reprise dans des compositions historiques plus complexes. Un tableau de synthèse de ces formes différentielles et hybrides est présenté en annexe. +Cette dernière sous-section de 2.2 doit donc être lue comme une zone de +flexion de la typologie, non comme son abandon. Elle marque le passage +entre la reconstruction des formes fondamentales de régulation et leur +reprise dans des compositions historiques plus complexes. Un tableau de +synthèse de ces formes différentielles et hybrides est présenté en +annexe. -Les formes différentielles apparaissent précisément dans les configurations où la régulation archicratique ne se donne pas sur le mode de la clarté, de l’univocité ou de la symétrie. Elle y procède par modulation, inhibition, alternance ou passage, sans cesser pour autant d’être structurante. Il ne s’agit donc pas de nouveaux méta-régimes, mais de manières particulières d’activer un régime donné selon une temporalité discontinue, une intensité variable ou une distribution non uniforme de ses trois vecteurs. +Les formes différentielles apparaissent précisément dans les +configurations où la régulation archicratique ne se donne pas sur le +mode de la clarté, de l'univocité ou de la symétrie. Elle y procède par +modulation, inhibition, alternance ou passage, sans cesser pour autant +d'être structurante. Il ne s'agit donc pas de nouveaux méta-régimes, +mais de manières particulières d'activer un régime donné selon une +temporalité discontinue, une intensité variable ou une distribution non +uniforme de ses trois vecteurs. -Une première figure de cette différenciation est celle de l’intériorisation. Avec Elias, mais aussi, à d’autres niveaux, avec Mauss ou Freud, on voit apparaître des configurations dans lesquelles la régulation ne passe plus d’abord par une scène extérieure fortement marquée, mais par l’incorporation progressive de contraintes devenues presque spontanées. Postures, retenues, rythmes de parole, manières de table, contrôle des affects ou des pulsions : tout un ordre social peut tenir par des schèmes intériorisés qui rendent la contrainte moins visible sans la dissoudre. L’arcalité y devient comportementale ; la cratialité se fait discrète, parfois inhibée ; l’archicration s’exerce dans le travail diffus par lequel un sujet apprend à se gouverner selon des attentes reçues. Nous ne sommes plus ici dans l’éclat d’un code affiché, mais dans une régulation par stylisation incorporée du possible. +Une première figure de cette différenciation est celle de +l'intériorisation. Avec Elias, mais aussi, à d'autres niveaux, avec +Mauss ou Freud, on voit apparaître des configurations dans lesquelles la +régulation ne passe plus d'abord par une scène extérieure fortement +marquée, mais par l'incorporation progressive de contraintes devenues +presque spontanées. Postures, retenues, rythmes de parole, manières de +table, contrôle des affects ou des pulsions : tout un ordre social peut +tenir par des schèmes intériorisés qui rendent la contrainte moins +visible sans la dissoudre. L'arcalité y devient comportementale ; la +cratialité se fait discrète, parfois inhibée ; l'archicration s'exerce +dans le travail diffus par lequel un sujet apprend à se gouverner selon +des attentes reçues. Nous ne sommes plus ici dans l'éclat d'un code +affiché, mais dans une régulation par stylisation incorporée du +possible. -Une deuxième figure est celle de l’alternance cyclique. Certaines sociétés n’activent pas uniformément un même principe régulateur, mais l’adossent à des saisons, à des séquences rituelles, à des conjonctures de rareté ou d’abondance, à des moments de guerre, de fête ou de dispersion. Graeber et Sahlins ont bien montré que des formes de commandement pouvaient être actives dans certaines phases puis neutralisées dans d’autres, sans que cette intermittence traduise une faiblesse institutionnelle. Au contraire, la régulation tient précisément à cette capacité de varier sans se dissoudre. L’arcalité n’y est pas fixe : elle se réancre dans des moments, des lieux et des occasions. La cratialité s’active puis se retire. L’archicration passe alors par la reconnaissance partagée de ces seuils de bascule, de ces temps où l’ordre change de régime sans cesser d’être intelligible. +Une deuxième figure est celle de l'alternance cyclique. Certaines +sociétés n'activent pas uniformément un même principe régulateur, mais +l'adossent à des saisons, à des séquences rituelles, à des conjonctures +de rareté ou d'abondance, à des moments de guerre, de fête ou de +dispersion. Graeber et Sahlins ont bien montré que des formes de +commandement pouvaient être actives dans certaines phases puis +neutralisées dans d'autres, sans que cette intermittence traduise une +faiblesse institutionnelle. Au contraire, la régulation tient +précisément à cette capacité de varier sans se dissoudre. L'arcalité n'y +est pas fixe : elle se réancre dans des moments, des lieux et des +occasions. La cratialité s'active puis se retire. L'archicration passe +alors par la reconnaissance partagée de ces seuils de bascule, de ces +temps où l'ordre change de régime sans cesser d'être intelligible. -Une troisième figure est celle de l’inhibition volontaire du pouvoir. Clastres en a fourni l’analyse la plus tranchée : certaines sociétés ne sont pas dépourvues de régulation ; elles organisent activement l’empêchement d’une cristallisation durable de la domination. Le chef y parle sans commander, représente sans accumuler, centralise sans pouvoir convertir cette centralité en souveraineté durable. L’intérêt d’une telle configuration, du point de vue archicratique, est décisif : elle montre qu’un ordre peut se maintenir non seulement par activation positive d’une autorité, mais aussi par mise en échec systématique de son épaississement. L’arcalité y est diffuse, souvent rituelle ou coutumière ; la cratialité est tenue à distance ; l’archicration réside dans les procédures sociales qui empêchent qu’un pouvoir d’abord fonctionnel devienne structurellement captateur. +Une troisième figure est celle de l'inhibition volontaire du pouvoir. +Clastres en a fourni l'analyse la plus tranchée : certaines sociétés ne +sont pas dépourvues de régulation ; elles organisent activement +l'empêchement d'une cristallisation durable de la domination. Le chef y +parle sans commander, représente sans accumuler, centralise sans pouvoir +convertir cette centralité en souveraineté durable. L'intérêt d'une +telle configuration, du point de vue archicratique, est décisif : elle +montre qu'un ordre peut se maintenir non seulement par activation +positive d'une autorité, mais aussi par mise en échec systématique de +son épaississement. L'arcalité y est diffuse, souvent rituelle ou +coutumière ; la cratialité est tenue à distance ; l'archicration réside +dans les procédures sociales qui empêchent qu'un pouvoir d'abord +fonctionnel devienne structurellement captateur. -Une quatrième figure est celle du passage initiatique ou générationnel. Avec Van Gennep ou Rouget, on voit se dessiner des régulations qui ne reposent ni sur la permanence d’une règle générale, ni sur l’alternance cyclique d’une autorité, mais sur le franchissement de seuils reconnus : âge, statut, sexe rituel, capacité nouvelle, entrée dans une classe, sortie d’une autre. Ici, la co-viabilité est produite par le passage réglé d’un état à un autre. L’arcalité réside dans le dispositif de seuil lui-même ; la cratialité appartient à ceux qui gardent, conduisent ou valident l’épreuve ; l’archicration s’accomplit dans la dramaturgie du franchissement, lorsque l’appartenance est réinstituée par transformation reconnue. Le régime n’est pas agonistique comme le guerrier, ni normatif comme le politico-juridique : il est transitionnel. +Une quatrième figure est celle du passage initiatique ou générationnel. +Avec Van Gennep ou Rouget, on voit se dessiner des régulations qui ne +reposent ni sur la permanence d'une règle générale, ni sur l'alternance +cyclique d'une autorité, mais sur le franchissement de seuils reconnus : +âge, statut, sexe rituel, capacité nouvelle, entrée dans une classe, +sortie d'une autre. Ici, la co-viabilité est produite par le passage +réglé d'un état à un autre. L'arcalité réside dans le dispositif de +seuil lui-même ; la cratialité appartient à ceux qui gardent, conduisent +ou valident l'épreuve ; l'archicration s'accomplit dans la dramaturgie +du franchissement, lorsque l'appartenance est réinstituée par +transformation reconnue. Le régime n'est pas agonistique comme le +guerrier, ni normatif comme le politico-juridique : il est +transitionnel. -Ces différentes figures ont un trait commun : elles montrent que la régulation n’exige pas toujours un centre durable, un code explicite ou une scène constamment active. Elle peut tenir par intériorisation des contraintes, par intermittence des formes d’autorité, par inhibition de leur fixation ou par passage d’un seuil à un autre. Dans tous ces cas, les vecteurs archicratiques ne disparaissent pas ; ils se redistribuent. L’arcalité devient parfois diffuse, la cratialité s’atténue ou se retire, l’archicration se concentre dans des moments rares mais décisifs. +Ces différentes figures ont un trait commun : elles montrent que la +régulation n'exige pas toujours un centre durable, un code explicite ou +une scène constamment active. Elle peut tenir par intériorisation des +contraintes, par intermittence des formes d'autorité, par inhibition de +leur fixation ou par passage d'un seuil à un autre. Dans tous ces cas, +les vecteurs archicratiques ne disparaissent pas ; ils se redistribuent. +L'arcalité devient parfois diffuse, la cratialité s'atténue ou se +retire, l'archicration se concentre dans des moments rares mais +décisifs. -Les formes différentielles ne doivent donc pas être traitées comme des cas mineurs. Elles révèlent au contraire une propriété essentielle de l’archicratie : sa capacité à se moduler sans s’abolir. Elles montrent que la co-viabilité ne dépend pas toujours d’un ordre continûment visible ; elle peut aussi procéder de respirations, de retenues, de reprises, d’alternances et de seuils. Ce sont là des formes souples, parfois discrètes, mais pleinement structurantes de la vie collective. +Les formes différentielles ne doivent donc pas être traitées comme des +cas mineurs. Elles révèlent au contraire une propriété essentielle de +l'archicratie : sa capacité à se moduler sans s'abolir. Elles montrent +que la co-viabilité ne dépend pas toujours d'un ordre continûment +visible ; elle peut aussi procéder de respirations, de retenues, de +reprises, d'alternances et de seuils. Ce sont là des formes souples, +parfois discrètes, mais pleinement structurantes de la vie collective. -À côté de ces modulations internes d’un régime donné, il faut maintenant considérer les configurations où plusieurs logiques archicratiques s’entrelacent dans une même scène sociale. Nous entrons alors dans le domaine des formes hybrides proprement dites : non plus des variations internes d’un seul régime, mais des montages où plusieurs principes de régulation coexistent, se soutiennent, se corrigent ou se contrarient sans se fondre dans une synthèse stable. +À côté de ces modulations internes d'un régime donné, il faut maintenant +considérer les configurations où plusieurs logiques archicratiques +s'entrelacent dans une même scène sociale. Nous entrons alors dans le +domaine des formes hybrides proprement dites : non plus des variations +internes d'un seul régime, mais des montages où plusieurs principes de +régulation coexistent, se soutiennent, se corrigent ou se contrarient +sans se fondre dans une synthèse stable. -L’hybridité archicratique ne doit pas être comprise comme un défaut d’analyse ni comme une impureté secondaire. Elle constitue l’un des modes ordinaires de la régulation historique. Dans les sociétés effectives, il est rare qu’une scène de co-viabilité soit portée par un seul vecteur dominant, parfaitement isolable. Le plus souvent, une normativité juridique s’adosse à des supports symboliques, une logique économique se trouve enveloppée par des médiations politiques, une discipline éducative emprunte à la fois à l’écrit, au rite, à l’affect et à l’évaluation. L’intérêt des formes hybrides est précisément de montrer comment plusieurs régimes peuvent être co-présents sans cesser d’être distincts en droit. +L'hybridité archicratique ne doit pas être comprise comme un défaut +d'analyse ni comme une impureté secondaire. Elle constitue l'un des +modes ordinaires de la régulation historique. Dans les sociétés +effectives, il est rare qu'une scène de co-viabilité soit portée par un +seul vecteur dominant, parfaitement isolable. Le plus souvent, une +normativité juridique s'adosse à des supports symboliques, une logique +économique se trouve enveloppée par des médiations politiques, une +discipline éducative emprunte à la fois à l'écrit, au rite, à l'affect +et à l'évaluation. L'intérêt des formes hybrides est précisément de +montrer comment plusieurs régimes peuvent être co-présents sans cesser +d'être distincts en droit. -Une première famille de cas est celle des montages coercitivo-capitalistes, dont Tilly a donné une formulation classique. Dans ces configurations, la co-viabilité ne procède ni de la seule coercition, ni de la seule circulation marchande, ni de la seule normativité politique. Elle tient à leur articulation pragmatique : extraction de ressources, protection armée, reconnaissance contractuelle, capacité administrative, négociation locale. L’arcalité s’y distribue entre ressources, territoires, dettes, fidélités et infrastructures ; la cratialité oscille entre contrainte armée, prélèvement et arbitrage ; l’archicration se joue dans des scènes d’ajustement entre exigence de force et nécessité de rendre la domination socialement praticable. De tels montages ne constituent pas un treizième régime pur : ils combinent, sous tension, les ressources du guerrier, du marchand, du normativo-politique et parfois du techno-logistique. +Une première famille de cas est celle des montages +coercitivo-capitalistes, dont Tilly a donné une formulation classique. +Dans ces configurations, la co-viabilité ne procède ni de la seule +coercition, ni de la seule circulation marchande, ni de la seule +normativité politique. Elle tient à leur articulation pragmatique : +extraction de ressources, protection armée, reconnaissance +contractuelle, capacité administrative, négociation locale. L'arcalité +s'y distribue entre ressources, territoires, dettes, fidélités et +infrastructures ; la cratialité oscille entre contrainte armée, +prélèvement et arbitrage ; l'archicration se joue dans des scènes +d'ajustement entre exigence de force et nécessité de rendre la +domination socialement praticable. De tels montages ne constituent pas +un treizième régime pur : ils combinent, sous tension, les ressources du +guerrier, du marchand, du normativo-politique et parfois du +techno-logistique. -Une deuxième famille de cas est celle des formes éducatives et disciplinaires. Ici, l’hybridité apparaît clairement : textes, programmes, figures magistrales, procédures d’évaluation, rites d’entrée, hiérarchies silencieuses et stylisations comportementales y coopèrent. École, séminaire ou institution de formation ne relèvent jamais d’un seul régime. Ils croisent généralement le scripturo-normatif par leurs supports, l’épistémique par la validation des savoirs, l’esthético-symbolique par les formes de présentation de soi, et parfois le normativo-politique lorsqu’ils prétendent former des sujets civiques. L’arcalité y est donc composite ; la cratialité passe à la fois par la fonction, par le savoir et par la discipline ; l’archicration se loge dans l’épreuve évaluative, dans la correction, dans la sélection, dans la transformation progressive d’un individu en sujet recevable pour un ordre donné. +Une deuxième famille de cas est celle des formes éducatives et +disciplinaires. Ici, l'hybridité apparaît clairement : textes, +programmes, figures magistrales, procédures d'évaluation, rites +d'entrée, hiérarchies silencieuses et stylisations comportementales y +coopèrent. École, séminaire ou institution de formation ne relèvent +jamais d'un seul régime. Ils croisent généralement le scripturo-normatif +par leurs supports, l'épistémique par la validation des savoirs, +l'esthético-symbolique par les formes de présentation de soi, et parfois +le normativo-politique lorsqu'ils prétendent former des sujets civiques. +L'arcalité y est donc composite ; la cratialité passe à la fois par la +fonction, par le savoir et par la discipline ; l'archicration se loge +dans l'épreuve évaluative, dans la correction, dans la sélection, dans +la transformation progressive d'un individu en sujet recevable pour un +ordre donné. -Une troisième famille est celle des formes ludiques, cérémonielles ou quasi-ludiques. Huizinga et Caillois ont montré que le jeu ne constitue pas un dehors du social, mais l’un de ses laboratoires. Or ce qui importe ici, c’est moins le jeu comme activité séparée que sa capacité à articuler plusieurs logiques régulatrices : convention, compétition, mimésis, hiérarchie, rite, style, suspension temporaire de la norme ordinaire. Dans ces configurations, l’arcalité peut être purement conventionnelle tout en étant fortement tenue ; la cratialité peut être feinte sans être insignifiante ; l’archicration peut se déployer dans l’arbitrage, dans l’épreuve compétitive ou dans l’acceptation commune de règles provisoires. Ces formes sont hybrides parce qu’elles font coopérer, dans un même espace, des dimensions agonistiques, symboliques, narratives et disciplinaires sans les réduire les unes aux autres. +Une troisième famille est celle des formes ludiques, cérémonielles ou +quasi-ludiques. Huizinga et Caillois ont montré que le jeu ne constitue +pas un dehors du social, mais l'un de ses laboratoires. Or ce qui +importe ici, c'est moins le jeu comme activité séparée que sa capacité à +articuler plusieurs logiques régulatrices : convention, compétition, +mimésis, hiérarchie, rite, style, suspension temporaire de la norme +ordinaire. Dans ces configurations, l'arcalité peut être purement +conventionnelle tout en étant fortement tenue ; la cratialité peut être +feinte sans être insignifiante ; l'archicration peut se déployer dans +l'arbitrage, dans l'épreuve compétitive ou dans l'acceptation commune de +règles provisoires. Ces formes sont hybrides parce qu'elles font +coopérer, dans un même espace, des dimensions agonistiques, symboliques, +narratives et disciplinaires sans les réduire les unes aux autres. -Une quatrième famille, plus discrète mais décisive, est celle des régulations domestiques, familiales ou salariées. Ici, l’hybridité vient de ce que l’ordre se soutient à la fois par des statuts, des affects, des mémoires, des récits, des évaluations et des dépendances matérielles. Une maison, une parenté, un univers de travail ne tiennent jamais par un seul principe. Ils combinent souvent du narratif, du normatif, du positionnel, de l’économique et du symbolique. L’arcalité peut être logée dans un lieu, dans une fonction, dans une ancienneté, dans un héritage ou dans une promesse d’avenir ; la cratialité se distribue entre autorité quotidienne, contrôle discret, capacité d’évaluation ou pouvoir de sanction ; l’archicration s’exerce dans d’innombrables scènes mineures de rappel, de réajustement, de répartition, d’exclusion partielle ou de reconnaissance différentielle. Ce sont des formes profondément hybrides parce que leur efficacité dépend précisément de cette superposition de registres. +Une quatrième famille, plus discrète mais décisive, est celle des +régulations domestiques, familiales ou salariées. Ici, l'hybridité vient +de ce que l'ordre se soutient à la fois par des statuts, des affects, +des mémoires, des récits, des évaluations et des dépendances +matérielles. Une maison, une parenté, un univers de travail ne tiennent +jamais par un seul principe. Ils combinent souvent du narratif, du +normatif, du positionnel, de l'économique et du symbolique. L'arcalité +peut être logée dans un lieu, dans une fonction, dans une ancienneté, +dans un héritage ou dans une promesse d'avenir ; la cratialité se +distribue entre autorité quotidienne, contrôle discret, capacité +d'évaluation ou pouvoir de sanction ; l'archicration s'exerce dans +d'innombrables scènes mineures de rappel, de réajustement, de +répartition, d'exclusion partielle ou de reconnaissance différentielle. +Ce sont des formes profondément hybrides parce que leur efficacité +dépend précisément de cette superposition de registres. -Une dernière grande famille est celle des configurations éco-symboliques ou relationnelles, où la régulation articule des rapports entre humains, non-humains, lieux, cycles et interdits. Les travaux de Descola, Viveiros de Castro ou Ingold montrent que l’ordre n’y procède pas d’une stricte séparation entre nature, société et cosmologie. D’un point de vue archicratique, l’intérêt de ces formes tient à ce qu’elles composent souvent des éléments que notre typologie a distingués ailleurs : du sacral sans théologie, du symbolique sans pur esthétisme, du normatif sans juridicité explicite, du pratique sans réduction technicienne. L’arcalité y est diffuse mais fortement située ; la cratialité relationnelle plutôt que centralisée ; l’archicration s’exerce dans l’ajustement des échanges, des tabous, des seuils d’usage, des équilibres de prélèvement ou des dettes rituelles. Nous sommes bien ici devant des formes composites, non parce qu’elles seraient confuses, mais parce qu’elles agencent plusieurs principes sans les fusionner en une unité doctrinale. +Une dernière grande famille est celle des configurations éco-symboliques +ou relationnelles, où la régulation articule des rapports entre humains, +non-humains, lieux, cycles et interdits. Les travaux de Descola, +Viveiros de Castro ou Ingold montrent que l'ordre n'y procède pas d'une +stricte séparation entre nature, société et cosmologie. D'un point de +vue archicratique, l'intérêt de ces formes tient à ce qu'elles composent +souvent des éléments que notre typologie a distingués ailleurs : du +sacral sans théologie, du symbolique sans pur esthétisme, du normatif +sans juridicité explicite, du pratique sans réduction technicienne. +L'arcalité y est diffuse mais fortement située ; la cratialité +relationnelle plutôt que centralisée ; l'archicration s'exerce dans +l'ajustement des échanges, des tabous, des seuils d'usage, des +équilibres de prélèvement ou des dettes rituelles. Nous sommes bien ici +devant des formes composites, non parce qu'elles seraient confuses, mais +parce qu'elles agencent plusieurs principes sans les fusionner en une +unité doctrinale. -Ce que montrent toutes ces figures, c’est que l’hybridité n’est pas une anomalie périphérique mais une condition fréquente de la régulation historique. Une société tient souvent non par pureté de régime, mais par tressage de plusieurs logiques partiellement compatibles. L’archicration, dans ces cas, n’est pas le déploiement linéaire d’un seul principe ; elle est l’articulation concrète, parfois fragile, parfois robuste, d’éléments hétérogènes qui se compensent ou se relaient. +Ce que montrent toutes ces figures, c'est que l'hybridité n'est pas une +anomalie périphérique mais une condition fréquente de la régulation +historique. Une société tient souvent non par pureté de régime, mais par +tressage de plusieurs logiques partiellement compatibles. +L'archicration, dans ces cas, n'est pas le déploiement linéaire d'un +seul principe ; elle est l'articulation concrète, parfois fragile, +parfois robuste, d'éléments hétérogènes qui se compensent ou se +relaient. -Les formes hybrides obligent ainsi à une vigilance méthodologique décisive. Il ne faut ni les absolutiser en nouveaux méta-régimes autonomes, ni les dissoudre dans l’indistinction empirique. Elles exigent au contraire une lecture capable d’identifier les régimes qui les composent, le principe qui y domine éventuellement, les tensions qui les traversent et les seuils à partir desquels leur équilibre devient instable. En ce sens, elles mettent à l’épreuve la robustesse de toute la typologie : non en l’invalidant, mais en montrant que les formes pures ne deviennent pleinement intelligibles qu’au moment où l’on sait aussi reconnaître leurs combinaisons. +Les formes hybrides obligent ainsi à une vigilance méthodologique +décisive. Il ne faut ni les absolutiser en nouveaux méta-régimes +autonomes, ni les dissoudre dans l'indistinction empirique. Elles +exigent au contraire une lecture capable d'identifier les régimes qui +les composent, le principe qui y domine éventuellement, les tensions qui +les traversent et les seuils à partir desquels leur équilibre devient +instable. En ce sens, elles mettent à l'épreuve la robustesse de toute +la typologie : non en l'invalidant, mais en montrant que les formes +pures ne deviennent pleinement intelligibles qu'au moment où l'on sait +aussi reconnaître leurs combinaisons. -Ce parcours des formes différentielles et hybrides permet de préciser la portée exacte de notre archéotypologie. Les méta-régimes dégagés précédemment ne valent ni comme des essences closes, ni comme des modèles empiriquement exclusifs, mais comme des pôles de structuration à partir desquels les configurations réelles de co-viabilité se composent, se modulent et se transforment. +Ce parcours des formes différentielles et hybrides permet de préciser la +portée exacte de notre archéotypologie. Les méta-régimes dégagés +précédemment ne valent ni comme des essences closes, ni comme des +modèles empiriquement exclusifs, mais comme des pôles de structuration à +partir desquels les configurations réelles de co-viabilité se composent, +se modulent et se transforment. -Les formes différentielles ont montré que la régulation peut se maintenir sans activation constante d’un régime pleinement explicite : par intériorisation, par intermittence, par inhibition ou par passage. Les formes hybrides ont montré, quant à elles, que plusieurs logiques archicratiques peuvent coexister dans une même scène sans se réduire à une unité synthétique. Dans les deux cas, l’archicration demeure opérante, mais selon des modalités qui excèdent la figure d’un régime simple. +Les formes différentielles ont montré que la régulation peut se +maintenir sans activation constante d'un régime pleinement explicite : +par intériorisation, par intermittence, par inhibition ou par passage. +Les formes hybrides ont montré, quant à elles, que plusieurs logiques +archicratiques peuvent coexister dans une même scène sans se réduire à +une unité synthétique. Dans les deux cas, l'archicration demeure +opérante, mais selon des modalités qui excèdent la figure d'un régime +simple. -Il en résulte une conséquence méthodologique décisive : la typologie archicratique ne doit jamais être mobilisée comme un instrument de classification rigide, mais comme une grammaire d’analyse des compositions régulatrices. Elle permet d’identifier les principes à l’œuvre, de distinguer les vecteurs dominants, de repérer les tensions internes, mais elle doit toujours être réinscrite dans l’épaisseur des montages concrets. +Il en résulte une conséquence méthodologique décisive : la typologie +archicratique ne doit jamais être mobilisée comme un instrument de +classification rigide, mais comme une grammaire d'analyse des +compositions régulatrices. Elle permet d'identifier les principes à +l'œuvre, de distinguer les vecteurs dominants, de repérer les tensions +internes, mais elle doit toujours être réinscrite dans l'épaisseur des +montages concrets. -Cette dernière sous-section ne prolonge donc pas la série des méta-régimes ; elle en éprouve les limites et en met au jour les zones de flexion. Elle montre que la co-viabilité humaine ne se donne presque jamais dans la pureté d’un régime, mais dans des équilibres instables, des alternances, des tressages et des ajustements situés. Un tableau de synthèse de ces formes différentielles et hybrides est présenté en annexe. +Cette dernière sous-section ne prolonge donc pas la série des +méta-régimes ; elle en éprouve les limites et en met au jour les zones +de flexion. Elle montre que la co-viabilité humaine ne se donne presque +jamais dans la pureté d'un régime, mais dans des équilibres instables, +des alternances, des tressages et des ajustements situés. Un tableau de +synthèse de ces formes différentielles et hybrides est présenté en +annexe. ## **Typologie archéogénétique des méta-régimes régulateurs** -Au terme de ce parcours, la typologie archéogénétique des méta-régimes régulateurs ne doit être comprise ni comme une classification figée, ni comme un inventaire empirique des formes observables dans l’histoire humaine. Elle constitue une cartographie des principales modalités selon lesquelles une société peut instituer, maintenir, transformer et éprouver sa co-viabilité. +Au terme de ce parcours, la typologie archéogénétique des méta-régimes +régulateurs ne doit être comprise ni comme une classification figée, ni +comme un inventaire empirique des formes observables dans l'histoire +humaine. Elle constitue une cartographie des principales modalités selon +lesquelles une société peut instituer, maintenir, transformer et +éprouver sa co-viabilité. -Le nombre et la distinction de ces méta-régimes ne valent donc ni comme découpage absolu du réel historique, ni comme nomenclature close. Ils répondent à une exigence d’irréductibilité morphologique : un nouveau méta-régime n’est nommé que lorsqu’apparaît une manière distincte d’articuler fondement, opération et épreuve, sans pouvoir être ramenée sans perte décisive à une forme déjà décrite. Inversement, là où la variation n’affecte que l’intensité, la dominante ou la combinaison de logiques déjà identifiées, il faut parler de modulation, d’hybridation ou de composition, non de méta-régime nouveau. +Le nombre et la distinction de ces méta-régimes ne valent donc ni comme +découpage absolu du réel historique, ni comme nomenclature close. Ils +répondent à une exigence d'irréductibilité morphologique : un nouveau +méta-régime n'est nommé que lorsqu'apparaît une manière distincte +d'articuler fondement, opération et épreuve, sans pouvoir être ramenée +sans perte décisive à une forme déjà décrite. Inversement, là où la +variation n'affecte que l'intensité, la dominante ou la combinaison de +logiques déjà identifiées, il faut parler de modulation, d'hybridation +ou de composition, non de méta-régime nouveau. -La typologie n’est donc pas un droit à multiplier les catégories ; elle est une discipline de discrimination. Par conséquent, les douze méta-régimes spécifiques dégagés au fil de cette section — du proto-symbolique au guerrier — n’ont ni valeur d’époque, ni statut de stades évolutifs. Ils désignent des matrices de cohérence régulatrice, c’est-à-dire des compositions relativement distinctes entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration, à partir desquelles un ordre peut se rendre pensable, praticable et contestable. Le plan différentiel et hybride qui clôt la section n’ajoute pas un régime supplémentaire à cette série ; il en explicite la plasticité concrète, en montrant que les configurations historiques effectives procèdent souvent par modulation, combinaison ou chevauchement de ces pôles. +La typologie n'est donc pas un droit à multiplier les catégories ; elle +est une discipline de discrimination. Par conséquent, les douze +méta-régimes spécifiques dégagés au fil de cette section — du +proto-symbolique au guerrier — n'ont ni valeur d'époque, ni statut de +stades évolutifs. Ils désignent des matrices de cohérence régulatrice, +c'est-à-dire des compositions relativement distinctes entre arcalité, +cratialité et archicration, à partir desquelles un ordre peut se rendre +pensable, praticable et contestable. Le plan différentiel et hybride qui +clôt la section n'ajoute pas un régime supplémentaire à cette série ; il +en explicite la plasticité concrète, en montrant que les configurations +historiques effectives procèdent souvent par modulation, combinaison ou +chevauchement de ces pôles. -Malgré leur hétérogénéité, ces régimes ont en commun une même structure intelligible. Chacun organise, selon une composition singulière, une arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration. L’arcalité désigne ce par quoi un ordre se rend recevable ; la cratialité, ce par quoi il se rend opératoire, agissant et distributif ; l’archicration, enfin, la scène dans laquelle cet ordre s’expose, se règle, s’éprouve, se confirme ou se reconfigure. Ce n’est donc pas l’identité de leurs contenus qui permet de comparer ces méta-régimes, mais la manière dont chacun agence ces trois vecteurs. +Malgré leur hétérogénéité, ces régimes ont en commun une même structure +intelligible. Chacun organise, selon une composition singulière, une +arcalité, une cratialité et une archicration. L'arcalité désigne ce par +quoi un ordre se rend recevable ; la cratialité, ce par quoi il se rend +opératoire, agissant et distributif ; l'archicration, enfin, la scène +dans laquelle cet ordre s'expose, se règle, s'éprouve, se confirme ou se +reconfigure. Ce n'est donc pas l'identité de leurs contenus qui permet +de comparer ces méta-régimes, mais la manière dont chacun agence ces +trois vecteurs. -C’est en ce sens que l’archicratie ne doit jamais être comprise comme une substance, un domaine particulier ou une idéologie parmi d’autres. Elle désigne la lecture même par laquelle une société se donne une forme tenable, une puissance d’effectuation et une scène de régulation. Les régimes diffèrent par leur principe de fondation, par leur mode d’autorité et par leur manière propre de mettre en jeu le lien collectif ; mais tous relèvent de cette même grammaire triangulaire. La typologie proposée dans cette section n’a donc pas pour fonction de juxtaposer des contenus hétéroclites, mais de rendre comparables des modes distincts de composition entre fondement, puissance et épreuve. +C'est en ce sens que l'archicratie ne doit jamais être comprise comme +une substance, un domaine particulier ou une idéologie parmi d'autres. +Elle désigne la lecture même par laquelle une société se donne une forme +tenable, une puissance d'effectuation et une scène de régulation. Les +régimes diffèrent par leur principe de fondation, par leur mode +d'autorité et par leur manière propre de mettre en jeu le lien collectif +; mais tous relèvent de cette même grammaire triangulaire. La typologie +proposée dans cette section n'a donc pas pour fonction de juxtaposer des +contenus hétéroclites, mais de rendre comparables des modes distincts de +composition entre fondement, puissance et épreuve. -L’ambition n’est pas ici d’expliquer l’histoire universelle des formes politiques, mais de fournir une grammaire généalogique permettant de penser la pluralité des régulations humaines sans les réduire à un modèle unique. Il ne s’agit pas de dire *ce qui a été*, mais de rendre intelligible *comment un ordre peut advenir, persister ou se dissoudre, en fonction de configurations archicratiques localisées*. En cela, la typologie n’est ni descriptive ni normative : elle est structurante — c’est-à-dire apte à saisir les régularités formelles qui sous-tendent des réalités empiriques hétérogènes. +L'ambition n'est pas ici d'expliquer l'histoire universelle des formes +politiques, mais de fournir une grammaire généalogique permettant de +penser la pluralité des régulations humaines sans les réduire à un +modèle unique. Il ne s'agit pas de dire *ce qui a été*, mais de rendre +intelligible *comment un ordre peut advenir, persister ou se dissoudre, +en fonction de configurations archicratiques localisées*. En cela, la +typologie n'est ni descriptive ni normative : elle est structurante — c'est-à-dire apte à saisir les régularités formelles qui sous-tendent +des réalités empiriques hétérogènes. -Cette cartographie appelle toutefois une vigilance critique constante. D’abord parce qu’une typologie, si rigoureuse soit-elle, demeure une abstraction : elle isole des cohérences, mais les sociétés historiques ne se laissent jamais réduire entièrement à ces lignes pures. Les cas mixtes, les régimes en tension, les formes instables ou disjointes ne sont donc pas des anomalies secondaires ; ils rappellent que l’archicration agit le plus souvent dans des agencements traversés de porosités, de relais et de déplacements. Ensuite parce que tout ordre régulateur comporte aussi une part d’opacité : la co-viabilité ne se donne pas toujours dans la pleine visibilité de ses principes, mais aussi dans des gestes, des silences, des inhibitions, des marges ou des refus, où l’archicration opère sans nécessairement se déclarer. +Cette cartographie appelle toutefois une vigilance critique constante. +D'abord parce qu'une typologie, si rigoureuse soit-elle, demeure une +abstraction : elle isole des cohérences, mais les sociétés historiques +ne se laissent jamais réduire entièrement à ces lignes pures. Les cas +mixtes, les régimes en tension, les formes instables ou disjointes ne +sont donc pas des anomalies secondaires ; ils rappellent que +l'archicration agit le plus souvent dans des agencements traversés de +porosités, de relais et de déplacements. Ensuite parce que tout ordre +régulateur comporte aussi une part d'opacité : la co-viabilité ne se +donne pas toujours dans la pleine visibilité de ses principes, mais +aussi dans des gestes, des silences, des inhibitions, des marges ou des +refus, où l'archicration opère sans nécessairement se déclarer. -C’est pourquoi la présente typologie doit être comprise moins comme une classification close que comme une grammaire comparative. Elle ne vise ni à ordonner les sociétés selon une échelle, ni à distribuer les régimes sur une ligne d’évolution. Elle donne plutôt les moyens de saisir comment un ordre advient, se maintient, vacille ou se recompose selon des configurations archicratiques situées. Il n’y a pas de progrès régulateur au sens linéaire ; il n’y a que des montages historiques, des équilibres précaires, des condensations, des reprises et des déplacements. +C'est pourquoi la présente typologie doit être comprise moins comme une +classification close que comme une grammaire comparative. Elle ne vise +ni à ordonner les sociétés selon une échelle, ni à distribuer les +régimes sur une ligne d'évolution. Elle donne plutôt les moyens de +saisir comment un ordre advient, se maintient, vacille ou se recompose +selon des configurations archicratiques situées. Il n'y a pas de progrès +régulateur au sens linéaire ; il n'y a que des montages historiques, des +équilibres précaires, des condensations, des reprises et des +déplacements. -Telle est la leçon la plus profonde de cette section : l’archicratie n’est pas un régime supplémentaire parmi d’autres, mais la condition formelle de toute régulation pensable. Elle désigne la structure par laquelle une société se rend capable de fonder, d’activer et d’éprouver son propre ordre. En ce sens, elle n’est pas une doctrine du pouvoir, mais une intelligence de ses formes. +Telle est la leçon la plus profonde de cette section : l'archicratie +n'est pas un régime supplémentaire parmi d'autres, mais la condition +formelle de toute régulation pensable. Elle désigne la structure par +laquelle une société se rend capable de fonder, d'activer et d'éprouver +son propre ordre. En ce sens, elle n'est pas une doctrine du pouvoir, +mais une intelligence de ses formes. -Dès lors, le passage au chapitre suivant ne consistera pas à quitter cette typologie, mais à la mettre à l’épreuve des trajectoires historiques concrètes. Après avoir reconstruit les grandes formes de régulation, il faudra désormais examiner leurs compositions effectives, leurs déplacements, leurs tensions et leurs incarnations civilisationnelles. Ainsi s’achève la section 2.2 : non comme clôture définitive, mais comme grammaire de lecture pour la suite de l’essai. +Dès lors, le passage au chapitre suivant ne consistera pas à quitter +cette typologie, mais à la mettre à l'épreuve des trajectoires +historiques concrètes. Après avoir reconstruit les grandes formes de +régulation, il faudra désormais examiner leurs compositions effectives, +leurs déplacements, leurs tensions et leurs incarnations +civilisationnelles. Ainsi s'achève la section 2.2 : non comme clôture +définitive, mais comme grammaire de lecture pour la suite de l'essai. ## **2.3 — Historiographie comparée des régimes régulateurs** -Il ne s’agit donc pas ici d’illustrer après coup une typologie abstraite, mais d’en éprouver la portée dans l’épaisseur des mondes historiques, non plus comme forme pure, mais comme composition située d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration. +Il ne s'agit donc pas ici d'illustrer après coup une typologie +abstraite, mais d'en éprouver la portée dans l'épaisseur des mondes +historiques, non plus comme forme pure, mais comme composition située +d'arcalité, de cratialité et d'archicration. -Mais cette typologie, pour puissante qu’elle soit, ne peut rester un exercice spéculatif. Elle appelle, comme sa contrepartie nécessaire, un examen empirique des formes régulatrices effectivement instituées dans l’histoire. C’est l’objet du présent sous-chapitre. Car si la pensée archicratique veut se tenir à la hauteur de sa prétention ontologique — penser les conditions de possibilité de la coexistence humaine — elle doit aussi se confronter aux incarnations historiques, aux déploiements concrets, aux architectures régulatrices telles qu’elles se sont réellement constituées, stabilisées, altérées ou effondrées. +Mais cette typologie, pour puissante qu'elle soit, ne peut rester un +exercice spéculatif. Elle appelle, comme sa contrepartie nécessaire, un +examen empirique des formes régulatrices effectivement instituées dans +l'histoire. C'est l'objet du présent sous-chapitre. Car si la pensée +archicratique veut se tenir à la hauteur de sa prétention ontologique — penser les conditions de possibilité de la coexistence humaine — elle doit aussi se confronter aux incarnations historiques, aux +déploiements concrets, aux architectures régulatrices telles qu'elles se +sont réellement constituées, stabilisées, altérées ou effondrées. -Ce changement de focale implique un déplacement méthodologique : il ne s’agit plus ici de modéliser des formes pures, mais de diagnostiquer des agencements historiques situés, en mobilisant les outils du comparatisme, de la généalogie et de l’archéologie politique. Chaque section analysera un régime historiquement institué comme constellation singulière d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration. +Ce changement de focale implique un déplacement méthodologique : il ne +s'agit plus ici de modéliser des formes pures, mais de diagnostiquer des +agencements historiques situés, en mobilisant les outils du +comparatisme, de la généalogie et de l'archéologie politique. Chaque +section analysera un régime historiquement institué comme constellation +singulière d'arcalité, de cratialité et d'archicration. -Ce parcours nous conduira depuis les régimes de régulation explicitement formulés de l’Antiquité (nomocratie grecque, lex romaine) jusqu’aux dispositifs cybernétiques du XXIe siècle, en passant par les pastorats religieux, les souverainetés monarchiques, les disciplines industrielles, les régimes totalitaires, les formes coloniales et post-coloniales, et les gouvernances technocratiques modernes. À chaque étape, nous interrogerons la manière dont les trois pôles archicratiques ont été activés, distribués, refoulés ou manipulés, dans des cadres historiques et techniques singuliers. +Ce parcours nous conduira depuis les régimes de régulation explicitement +formulés de l'Antiquité (nomocratie grecque, lex romaine) jusqu'aux +dispositifs cybernétiques du XXIe siècle, en passant par les pastorats +religieux, les souverainetés monarchiques, les disciplines +industrielles, les régimes totalitaires, les formes coloniales et +post-coloniales, et les gouvernances technocratiques modernes. À chaque +étape, nous interrogerons la manière dont les trois pôles archicratiques +ont été activés, distribués, refoulés ou manipulés, dans des cadres +historiques et techniques singuliers. -Mais il faut rappeler que ce travail ne relève pas d’une narration linéaire. Il ne s’agit ni de raconter l’histoire du progrès, ni d’ordonner des séquences, ni de retracer une évolution du simple vers le complexe. Nous nous situons ici dans une épistémologie non téléologique, qui refuse toute flèche du temps régulateur. L’histoire des régimes de co-viabilité n’est pas une montée vers la raison : elle est stratifiée, bifurquante, parfois régressive, toujours composite. Il existe des réactivations de formes anciennes, des cohabitations hybrides et des reconfigurations souterraines ou silencieuses. +Mais il faut rappeler que ce travail ne relève pas d'une narration +linéaire. Il ne s'agit ni de raconter l'histoire du progrès, ni +d'ordonner des séquences, ni de retracer une évolution du simple vers le +complexe. Nous nous situons ici dans une épistémologie non téléologique, +qui refuse toute flèche du temps régulateur. L'histoire des régimes de +co-viabilité n'est pas une montée vers la raison : elle est stratifiée, +bifurquante, parfois régressive, toujours composite. Il existe des +réactivations de formes anciennes, des cohabitations hybrides et des +reconfigurations souterraines ou silencieuses. -Ce chapitre ne prétendra donc pas délivrer une histoire de la régulation, mais une archéologie comparée des régimes régulateurs, attentive à leurs logiques profondes, à leurs articulations internes et à leurs seuils critiques. Nous mettrons systématiquement en œuvre une méthode de diagnostic différentiel, appuyée sur notre triangle archicratique, afin d’identifier, dans chaque cas : +Ce chapitre ne prétendra donc pas délivrer une histoire de la +régulation, mais une archéologie comparée des régimes régulateurs, +attentive à leurs logiques profondes, à leurs articulations internes et +à leurs seuils critiques. Nous mettrons systématiquement en œuvre une +méthode de diagnostic différentiel, appuyée sur notre triangle +archicratique, afin d'identifier, dans chaque cas : -- l’*arcalité mobilisée* (esthético-symbolique, techno-logistique, sacrale, etc.) ; +- l'*arcalité mobilisée* (esthético-symbolique, techno-logistique, + sacrale, etc.) ; -- la *cratialité dominante* (inspirée, coercitive, transactionnelle, etc.) ; +- la *cratialité dominante* (inspirée, coercitive, transactionnelle, + etc.) ; -- la forme d’*archicration activée* (rituelle, scripturale, contractuelle, algorithmique, etc.). +- la forme d'*archicration activée* (rituelle, scripturale, + contractuelle, algorithmique, etc.). -Nous réserverons un traitement particulier à la configuration émergente du régime cybernético-calculatoire, forme de régulation prédictive, machinique et auto-adaptative, qui constitue une inflexion majeure de la logique archicratique elle-même. S’il trouve ses racines dans certaines matrices antérieures, il introduit néanmoins une discontinuité telle qu’il mérite d’être abordé en tant que forme instituée à part entière, au croisement du politique, du technique et de l’ontologique. Ce régime ne sera pas traité comme un épilogue, mais comme une mise à l’épreuve ultime de notre modèle. +Nous réserverons un traitement particulier à la configuration émergente +du régime cybernético-calculatoire, forme de régulation prédictive, +machinique et auto-adaptative, qui constitue une inflexion majeure de la +logique archicratique elle-même. S'il trouve ses racines dans certaines +matrices antérieures, il introduit néanmoins une discontinuité telle +qu'il mérite d'être abordé en tant que forme instituée à part entière, +au croisement du politique, du technique et de l'ontologique. Ce régime +ne sera pas traité comme un épilogue, mais comme une mise à l'épreuve +ultime de notre modèle. -Ainsi, la section 2.3 ne poursuit pas la typologie. Elle en vérifie la portée. Elle opère le passage du concept à l’histoire, du modèle à la matérialité, de l’ontologie à l’épreuve. Elle montrera que l’archicratie n’est pas une théorie parmi d’autres, mais une clé de lecture de l’histoire humaine — celle qui fait apparaître, dans la diversité des régimes passés et présents, les tensions constitutives entre la forme, la force et la norme, ainsi que les manières infiniment variées dont les sociétés ont tenté d’y répondre. +Ainsi, la section 2.3 ne poursuit pas la typologie. Elle en vérifie la +portée. Elle opère le passage du concept à l'histoire, du modèle à la +matérialité, de l'ontologie à l'épreuve. Elle montrera que l'archicratie +n'est pas une théorie parmi d'autres, mais une clé de lecture de +l'histoire humaine — celle qui fait apparaître, dans la diversité des +régimes passés et présents, les tensions constitutives entre la forme, +la force et la norme, ainsi que les manières infiniment variées dont les +sociétés ont tenté d'y répondre. ### 2.3.1 — De la cité grecque aux empires impériaux -L’Antiquité n’introduit pas la régulation dans l’histoire humaine ; elle en déplace le régime de visibilité. Ce qui s’y affirme n’est pas l’apparition soudaine de l’ordre politique, mais une transformation de sa scène : dans plusieurs configurations antiques, la co-viabilité cesse d’être principalement portée par l’épaisseur indistincte de la coutume, de la ritualité ou de la seule distribution tacite des places ; elle tend à se formuler, à se mettre en procédure et à se laisser rapporter à des instances plus nettement identifiables de fondation, d’autorité et d’épreuve. +L'Antiquité n'introduit pas la régulation dans l'histoire humaine ; elle +en déplace le régime de visibilité. Ce qui s'y affirme n'est pas +l'apparition soudaine de l'ordre politique, mais une transformation de +sa scène : dans plusieurs configurations antiques, la co-viabilité cesse +d'être principalement portée par l'épaisseur indistincte de la coutume, +de la ritualité ou de la seule distribution tacite des places ; elle +tend à se formuler, à se mettre en procédure et à se laisser rapporter à +des instances plus nettement identifiables de fondation, d'autorité et +d'épreuve. -Il serait toutefois ruineux d’en faire un âge unitaire ou le seuil simple d’une rationalisation continue. Le monde antique tel que nous l’abordons ici n’est ni un bloc, ni une origine unique, ni une promesse téléologique. Il forme un champ de différenciation décisif, où plusieurs compositions du commun deviennent simultanément plus lisibles, plus explicites et plus transmissibles, sans pour autant converger vers une même figure. C’est en cela qu’elle importe à notre enquête : elle donne à voir, avec une netteté nouvelle, des compositions contrastées entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. +Il serait toutefois ruineux d'en faire un âge unitaire ou le seuil +simple d'une rationalisation continue. Le monde antique tel que nous +l'abordons ici n'est ni un bloc, ni une origine unique, ni une promesse +téléologique. Il forme un champ de différenciation décisif, où plusieurs +compositions du commun deviennent simultanément plus lisibles, plus +explicites et plus transmissibles, sans pour autant converger vers une +même figure. C'est en cela qu'elle importe à notre enquête : elle donne +à voir, avec une netteté nouvelle, des compositions contrastées entre +arcalité, cratialité et archicration. -La présente section ne se propose donc pas de résumer « l’Antiquité », mais d’isoler quelques montages majeurs, dans lesquels la tenue du lien collectif prend une forme suffisamment élaborée pour laisser apparaître, presque à découvert, la logique du triangle archicratique. Athènes, Rome, la Chine impériale et l’Inde brahmanique ne seront pas traitées comme des totalités closes, encore moins comme les étapes d’un récit de civilisation, mais comme des configurations singulières, irréductibles, à travers lesquelles peuvent se comparer plusieurs manières d’instituer, de porter et de régler l’ordre. +La présente section ne se propose donc pas de résumer « l'Antiquité », +mais d'isoler quelques montages majeurs, dans lesquels la tenue du lien +collectif prend une forme suffisamment élaborée pour laisser apparaître, +presque à découvert, la logique du triangle archicratique. Athènes, +Rome, la Chine impériale et l'Inde brahmanique ne seront pas traitées +comme des totalités closes, encore moins comme les étapes d'un récit de +civilisation, mais comme des configurations singulières, irréductibles, +à travers lesquelles peuvent se comparer plusieurs manières d'instituer, +de porter et de régler l'ordre. -Le cas grec s’impose d’abord, non parce qu’il contiendrait à lui seul l’essence du politique, mais parce qu’il offre l’une des premières scènes où la régulation devient elle-même affaire de forme publique. Avec la cité, et plus particulièrement avec Athènes, l’ordre commun ne se contente plus d’être vécu, hérité ou reconduit ; il s’expose dans des dispositifs où la règle peut être dite, discutée, infléchie, suspendue, reprise. L’ecclésia, l’agora, les tribunaux, les procédures de révision ne constituent pas un simple entourage institutionnel : ils forment l’espace même dans lequel la cité éprouve sa propre capacité à se gouverner. +Le cas grec s'impose d'abord, non parce qu'il contiendrait à lui seul +l'essence du politique, mais parce qu'il offre l'une des premières +scènes où la régulation devient elle-même affaire de forme publique. +Avec la cité, et plus particulièrement avec Athènes, l'ordre commun ne +se contente plus d'être vécu, hérité ou reconduit ; il s'expose dans des +dispositifs où la règle peut être dite, discutée, infléchie, suspendue, +reprise. L'ecclésia, l'agora, les tribunaux, les procédures de révision +ne constituent pas un simple entourage institutionnel : ils forment +l'espace même dans lequel la cité éprouve sa propre capacité à se +gouverner. -Ce point mérite d’être tenu avec précision. L’originalité athénienne ne réside pas dans une disparition du conflit, ni même dans une souveraineté populaire au sens plein, mais dans la production de formes recevables pour son traitement. L’arcalité y prend visage public ; la cratialité s’y distribue selon des procédures ; l’archicration y devient, pour une part décisive, l’organisation même des conditions dans lesquelles le désaccord peut être reconduit sans dissoudre la cité. La règle n’y vaut pas parce qu’elle descend d’un ailleurs indisponible, mais parce qu’elle entre dans des scènes où elle peut être reconduite, disputée et reformulée. +Ce point mérite d'être tenu avec précision. L'originalité athénienne ne +réside pas dans une disparition du conflit, ni même dans une +souveraineté populaire au sens plein, mais dans la production de formes +recevables pour son traitement. L'arcalité y prend visage public ; la +cratialité s'y distribue selon des procédures ; l'archicration y +devient, pour une part décisive, l'organisation même des conditions dans +lesquelles le désaccord peut être reconduit sans dissoudre la cité. La +règle n'y vaut pas parce qu'elle descend d'un ailleurs indisponible, +mais parce qu'elle entre dans des scènes où elle peut être reconduite, +disputée et reformulée. -Il faut aussitôt ajouter que cette exposition n’a rien d’universel. Le peuple athénien n’inclut ni tous les habitants de la cité, ni même tous ceux qui contribuent à son existence matérielle. Femmes, esclaves, métèques, étrangers demeurent, sous des formes diverses, retranchés de cette scène civique. Cette restriction n’invalide pas l’analyse ; elle en constitue au contraire l’une des conditions historiques. Athènes ne donne pas à voir une démocratie accomplie, mais une forme puissamment inventée et étroitement circonscrite de co-viabilité par publicité conflictuelle de la règle. C’est sous cette condition qu’elle nous importe ici. +Il faut aussitôt ajouter que cette exposition n'a rien d'universel. Le +peuple athénien n'inclut ni tous les habitants de la cité, ni même tous +ceux qui contribuent à son existence matérielle. Femmes, esclaves, +métèques, étrangers demeurent, sous des formes diverses, retranchés de +cette scène civique. Cette restriction n'invalide pas l'analyse ; elle +en constitue au contraire l'une des conditions historiques. Athènes ne +donne pas à voir une démocratie accomplie, mais une forme puissamment +inventée et étroitement circonscrite de co-viabilité par publicité +conflictuelle de la règle. C'est sous cette condition qu'elle nous +importe ici. -Mais ce régime demeure asymétrique. Comme l’ont rappelé Moses Finley (*Démocratie antique et démocratie moderne*, 1973) et Nicole Loraux (*La Cité divisée*, 1997), le citoyen athénien n’est pas tout homme : il est mâle, libre, autochtone, majeur, propriétaire. Les femmes, les métèques, les esclaves, les étrangers sont exclus de la scène régulatrice. Ce qui ne signifie pas absence de régulation à leur égard, mais *régulation sans voix*. Le régime est donc fortement gérontocratique, patriarcal, nativiste, bien que formellement isonomique. Il constitue un archétype d’archicration civique restreinte : réflexive pour certains, invisible pour d’autres. +Mais ce régime demeure asymétrique. Comme l'ont rappelé Moses Finley +(*Démocratie antique et démocratie moderne*, 1973) et Nicole Loraux (*La +Cité divisée*, 1997), le citoyen athénien n'est pas tout homme : il est +mâle, libre, autochtone, majeur, propriétaire. Les femmes, les métèques, +les esclaves, les étrangers sont exclus de la scène régulatrice. Ce qui +ne signifie pas absence de régulation à leur égard, mais *régulation +sans voix*. Le régime est donc fortement gérontocratique, patriarcal, +nativiste, bien que formellement isonomique. Il constitue un archétype +d'archicration civique restreinte : réflexive pour certains, invisible +pour d'autres. -La richesse et la complexité de ce régime ont été remarquablement restituées par Mogens H. Hansen (*The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes*, 1991), qui montre combien les institutions athéniennes — *boulè*, *ecclésia*, *dikastèria*, *euthynai*, *ostracisme*, *nomothetai* — formaient un écosystème régulateur capable d’articuler normes, dissensus, mémoire et sanction, sans jamais produire une figure souveraine de centralité. Le pouvoir ne réside pas dans un lieu, mais dans une forme mouvante, ritualisée, distribuée — un régime où l’ordre se construit par activation synchronique des trois vecteurs, sans verticalité stable. +La richesse et la complexité de ce régime ont été remarquablement +restituées par Mogens H. Hansen (*The Athenian Democracy in the Age of +Demosthenes*, 1991), qui montre combien les institutions athéniennes — *boulè*, *ecclésia*, *dikastèria*, *euthynai*, *ostracisme*, +*nomothetai* — formaient un écosystème régulateur capable d'articuler +normes, dissensus, mémoire et sanction, sans jamais produire une figure +souveraine de centralité. Le pouvoir ne réside pas dans un lieu, mais +dans une forme mouvante, ritualisée, distribuée — un régime où l'ordre +se construit par activation synchronique des trois vecteurs, sans +verticalité stable. -Cette tension — entre la visibilité des formes et l’invisibilité des exclusions ; entre le procédural et la hiérarchie sociale — constitue le cœur du régime athénien : une *co-viabilité* normative à conflictualité formalisée, où le désaccord devient ressource de stabilisation, où la règle est produite comme champ d’épreuve. La tragédie grecque, selon Nicole Loraux, en incarne le miroir inversé : non pas la célébration de la cité, mais sa mise en crise rituelle. La *polis* grecque n’a pas réalisé l’égalité : elle a inventé la *mise en forme de la régulation* — l’*archicration* comme scène agonistique. +Cette tension — entre la visibilité des formes et l'invisibilité des +exclusions ; entre le procédural et la hiérarchie sociale — constitue +le cœur du régime athénien : une *co-viabilité* normative à +conflictualité formalisée, où le désaccord devient ressource de +stabilisation, où la règle est produite comme champ d'épreuve. La +tragédie grecque, selon Nicole Loraux, en incarne le miroir inversé : +non pas la célébration de la cité, mais sa mise en crise rituelle. La +*polis* grecque n'a pas réalisé l'égalité : elle a inventé la *mise en +forme de la régulation* — l'*archicration* comme scène agonistique. -Mais Rome engage une inflexion d’une tout autre nature. Là où Athènes avait porté à une visibilité inédite la scène publique de mise en débat de l’ordre commun, Rome déplace le centre de gravité de la régulation vers la capacité à stabiliser, prolonger et étendre une normativité durable. Le problème n’y est plus principalement celui de la participation à la règle, mais celui de sa tenue dans le temps, de sa transmissibilité à travers les générations politiques, et de son applicabilité à des ensembles humains de plus en plus vastes et différenciés. +Mais Rome engage une inflexion d'une tout autre nature. Là où Athènes +avait porté à une visibilité inédite la scène publique de mise en débat +de l'ordre commun, Rome déplace le centre de gravité de la régulation +vers la capacité à stabiliser, prolonger et étendre une normativité +durable. Le problème n'y est plus principalement celui de la +participation à la règle, mais celui de sa tenue dans le temps, de sa +transmissibilité à travers les générations politiques, et de son +applicabilité à des ensembles humains de plus en plus vastes et +différenciés. -Ce déplacement est décisif. Rome ne se comprend pas d’abord comme une civilisation de la délibération, mais comme une civilisation de la continuité normative. L’arcalité romaine ne réside donc ni dans un mythe d’origine simplement reconduit, ni dans l’ouverture répétée d’une scène agonistique, mais dans l’épaisseur cumulative d’un monde de formes, de statuts, de précédents, de procédures et de qualifications capable de donner à la *res publica*, puis à l’Empire, une consistance propre. L’ordre collectif y devient moins affaire d’exposition conflictuelle immédiate que de tenue structurelle d’une architecture de validité. +Ce déplacement est décisif. Rome ne se comprend pas d'abord comme une +civilisation de la délibération, mais comme une civilisation de la +continuité normative. L'arcalité romaine ne réside donc ni dans un mythe +d'origine simplement reconduit, ni dans l'ouverture répétée d'une scène +agonistique, mais dans l'épaisseur cumulative d'un monde de formes, de +statuts, de précédents, de procédures et de qualifications capable de +donner à la *res publica*, puis à l'Empire, une consistance propre. +L'ordre collectif y devient moins affaire d'exposition conflictuelle +immédiate que de tenue structurelle d'une architecture de validité. -C’est dans cette perspective qu’il faut comprendre la force spécifique du droit romain. Il ne constitue pas seulement un instrument de résolution des litiges parmi d’autres ; il devient une matrice de production et de stabilisation de l’ordre. Comme l’a puissamment montré Yan Thomas, le droit romain n’est pas la simple expression d’une volonté politique préalable : il produit des effets propres de qualification, de distribution et de continuité. Il permet de faire tenir ensemble des différenciations de personnes, de biens, de lieux et de fonctions dans une syntaxe normative suffisamment robuste pour survivre à la variabilité des situations. La force n’y est pas extérieure au droit ; elle en est l’un des vecteurs de réalisation, mais sous une forme médiatisée, qualifiée et durable. +C'est dans cette perspective qu'il faut comprendre la force spécifique +du droit romain. Il ne constitue pas seulement un instrument de +résolution des litiges parmi d'autres ; il devient une matrice de +production et de stabilisation de l'ordre. Comme l'a puissamment montré +Yan Thomas, le droit romain n'est pas la simple expression d'une volonté +politique préalable : il produit des effets propres de qualification, de +distribution et de continuité. Il permet de faire tenir ensemble des +différenciations de personnes, de biens, de lieux et de fonctions dans +une syntaxe normative suffisamment robuste pour survivre à la +variabilité des situations. La force n'y est pas extérieure au droit ; +elle en est l'un des vecteurs de réalisation, mais sous une forme +médiatisée, qualifiée et durable. -La cratialité romaine se caractérise dès lors par sa distribution stratifiée. Sénat, magistratures, imperium, commandements militaires, juridictions, administrations : autant d’instances qui ne se superposent pas parfaitement, mais qui composent un champ de puissance hiérarchisé, différencié et relativement durable. Rome ne supprime pas les tensions entre ces pôles ; elle les agence dans une structure où la continuité de l’ordre importe davantage que la publicité du dissensus. La puissance n’y est donc ni purement collégiale comme à Athènes, ni encore totalement absorbée par une souveraineté unique : elle se déploie dans un système de relais, de délégations et de qualifications. +La cratialité romaine se caractérise dès lors par sa distribution +stratifiée. Sénat, magistratures, imperium, commandements militaires, +juridictions, administrations : autant d'instances qui ne se superposent +pas parfaitement, mais qui composent un champ de puissance hiérarchisé, +différencié et relativement durable. Rome ne supprime pas les tensions +entre ces pôles ; elle les agence dans une structure où la continuité de +l'ordre importe davantage que la publicité du dissensus. La puissance +n'y est donc ni purement collégiale comme à Athènes, ni encore +totalement absorbée par une souveraineté unique : elle se déploie dans +un système de relais, de délégations et de qualifications. -Avec l’Empire, cette logique franchit un seuil supplémentaire. L’archicration romaine tend alors à devenir textuelle, cumulative et centralisée. La normativité n’est plus seulement produite dans des scènes civiques situées ; elle se déploie dans un espace impérial où édits, rescrits, compilations et qualifications juridiques permettent d’étendre l’ordre à distance. Le droit devient infrastructure de régulation à grande échelle. Il ne se contente pas de dire ce qui est permis ou interdit : il distribue des statuts, hiérarchise des appartenances, qualifie des territoires, articule des fonctions. Le citoyen, le pérégrin, l’affranchi, l’esclave, le provincial ne relèvent pas d’un même régime de co-viabilité ; ils sont intégrés dans une architecture différentielle dont l’universalité affichée masque une forte stratification normative. +Avec l'Empire, cette logique franchit un seuil supplémentaire. +L'archicration romaine tend alors à devenir textuelle, cumulative et +centralisée. La normativité n'est plus seulement produite dans des +scènes civiques situées ; elle se déploie dans un espace impérial où +édits, rescrits, compilations et qualifications juridiques permettent +d'étendre l'ordre à distance. Le droit devient infrastructure de +régulation à grande échelle. Il ne se contente pas de dire ce qui est +permis ou interdit : il distribue des statuts, hiérarchise des +appartenances, qualifie des territoires, articule des fonctions. Le +citoyen, le pérégrin, l'affranchi, l'esclave, le provincial ne relèvent +pas d'un même régime de co-viabilité ; ils sont intégrés dans une +architecture différentielle dont l'universalité affichée masque une +forte stratification normative. -C’est ce qui fait la singularité profonde de Rome dans notre parcours : non pas avoir inventé l’ordre politique, mais avoir donné à la régulation une forme de durabilité impersonnelle inédite. Là où Athènes exposait la règle à la reprise conflictuelle, Rome lui confère une capacité supérieure de continuité, de qualification et d’extension. Elle institue ainsi une archicration juridico-politique de grande portée, dans laquelle la co-viabilité se soutient moins par la participation directe au débat que par l’intégration différenciée dans un monde de normes, de procédures et de statuts suffisamment consistant pour faire tenir ensemble un espace politique d’une ampleur sans précédent. +C'est ce qui fait la singularité profonde de Rome dans notre parcours : +non pas avoir inventé l'ordre politique, mais avoir donné à la +régulation une forme de durabilité impersonnelle inédite. Là où Athènes +exposait la règle à la reprise conflictuelle, Rome lui confère une +capacité supérieure de continuité, de qualification et d'extension. Elle +institue ainsi une archicration juridico-politique de grande portée, +dans laquelle la co-viabilité se soutient moins par la participation +directe au débat que par l'intégration différenciée dans un monde de +normes, de procédures et de statuts suffisamment consistant pour faire +tenir ensemble un espace politique d'une ampleur sans précédent. -Or cette forme n’est ni unique, ni exclusive. Hors du monde méditerranéen, d’autres civilisations antiques ont élaboré, selon des logiques tout aussi rigoureuses, des régimes archicratiques puissants, durables et hautement différenciés. Mais elles le font à partir d’un autre problème que celui posé par Athènes ou Rome : non plus seulement celui de la participation civique ou de la continuité juridico-politique de l’ordre, mais celui de l’ajustement entre hiérarchie cosmologique, ritualité sociale, textualité normative et administration des conduites. +Or cette forme n'est ni unique, ni exclusive. Hors du monde +méditerranéen, d'autres civilisations antiques ont élaboré, selon des +logiques tout aussi rigoureuses, des régimes archicratiques puissants, +durables et hautement différenciés. Mais elles le font à partir d'un +autre problème que celui posé par Athènes ou Rome : non plus seulement +celui de la participation civique ou de la continuité juridico-politique +de l'ordre, mais celui de l'ajustement entre hiérarchie cosmologique, +ritualité sociale, textualité normative et administration des conduites. -La Chine impériale fournit ici un cas majeur. Sous les Han, l’ordre ne repose ni sur la seule coercition légale, ni sur la seule intériorité morale, mais sur l’articulation réglée du Li et du Fa. Le rite n’y constitue pas un supplément décoratif de la loi ; il modèle les positions, les gestes, les hiérarchies et les obligations relationnelles. La loi, de son côté, ne vient pas abolir cette trame rituelle, mais la relayer, la durcir et la rendre justiciable lorsque l’ajustement symbolique ne suffit plus. Il en résulte une composition particulièrement dense entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration : l’arcalité s’enracine dans une cosmologie hiérarchisée du monde humain ; la cratialité se déploie à travers une bureaucratie impériale de plus en plus organisée ; l’archicration s’effectue dans la médiation constante entre canon, commentaire, décret, procédure et conduite. +La Chine impériale fournit ici un cas majeur. Sous les Han, l'ordre ne +repose ni sur la seule coercition légale, ni sur la seule intériorité +morale, mais sur l'articulation réglée du Li et du Fa. Le rite n'y +constitue pas un supplément décoratif de la loi ; il modèle les +positions, les gestes, les hiérarchies et les obligations +relationnelles. La loi, de son côté, ne vient pas abolir cette trame +rituelle, mais la relayer, la durcir et la rendre justiciable lorsque +l'ajustement symbolique ne suffit plus. Il en résulte une composition +particulièrement dense entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration : +l'arcalité s'enracine dans une cosmologie hiérarchisée du monde humain ; +la cratialité se déploie à travers une bureaucratie impériale de plus en +plus organisée ; l'archicration s'effectue dans la médiation constante +entre canon, commentaire, décret, procédure et conduite. -Ce point est décisif. Le pouvoir chinois classique ne cherche pas seulement à imposer un ordre ; il cherche à faire coïncider ordre social, tenue rituelle et intelligibilité cosmique. Comme l’a montré Mark Edward Lewis, la durabilité impériale tient précisément à cette capacité d’articulation : gouverner, ce n’est pas seulement contraindre, c’est inscrire les conduites dans une forme générale d’harmonisation entre places, temporalités et obligations. L’ordre y est moins délibératif qu’à Athènes, moins strictement juridique qu’à Rome, mais plus fortement intégré à une architecture continue de gestes, de fonctions et de textes. +Ce point est décisif. Le pouvoir chinois classique ne cherche pas +seulement à imposer un ordre ; il cherche à faire coïncider ordre +social, tenue rituelle et intelligibilité cosmique. Comme l'a montré +Mark Edward Lewis, la durabilité impériale tient précisément à cette +capacité d'articulation : gouverner, ce n'est pas seulement contraindre, +c'est inscrire les conduites dans une forme générale d'harmonisation +entre places, temporalités et obligations. L'ordre y est moins +délibératif qu'à Athènes, moins strictement juridique qu'à Rome, mais +plus fortement intégré à une architecture continue de gestes, de +fonctions et de textes. -L’Inde ancienne et classique fait apparaître une autre modalité, non moins élaborée, de composition archicratique. Ici, la régulation ne se laisse pas reconduire à un simple ordre théologico-politique indistinct. Elle articule des textualités normatives, des hiérarchies statutaires, des dispositifs de souveraineté et des économies du devoir selon une pluralité de plans partiellement superposés. Le *dharma* n’est pas seulement une règle religieuse ; il fonctionne comme principe de tenue du monde social, de répartition des fonctions, d’orientation des conduites et de différenciation des obligations. L’arcalité indienne se forme ainsi dans l’imbrication du cosmique, du statutaire et du normatif. +L'Inde ancienne et classique fait apparaître une autre modalité, non +moins élaborée, de composition archicratique. Ici, la régulation ne se +laisse pas reconduire à un simple ordre théologico-politique indistinct. +Elle articule des textualités normatives, des hiérarchies statutaires, +des dispositifs de souveraineté et des économies du devoir selon une +pluralité de plans partiellement superposés. Le *dharma* n'est pas +seulement une règle religieuse ; il fonctionne comme principe de tenue +du monde social, de répartition des fonctions, d'orientation des +conduites et de différenciation des obligations. L'arcalité indienne se +forme ainsi dans l'imbrication du cosmique, du statutaire et du +normatif. -Mais cette arcalité ne demeure pas purement spéculative. Avec les formations impériales, notamment maurya puis gupta, elle se trouve relayée par des appareils de commandement, des formes administratives, des fiscalités, des juridictions et des instruments textuels qui donnent à cette normativité une portée gouvernementale réelle. L’*Arthaśāstra*, si singulier à cet égard, montre bien que la régulation du monde humain ne relève pas seulement d’un ordre moral ou rituel, mais aussi d’un art de gouverner, de surveiller, de prélever, de punir et d’administrer. La cratialité y devient plus explicite, plus stratégique, parfois plus froide, sans rompre pour autant avec l’arrière-plan statutaire et cosmologique qui en soutient la légitimité. +Mais cette arcalité ne demeure pas purement spéculative. Avec les +formations impériales, notamment maurya puis gupta, elle se trouve +relayée par des appareils de commandement, des formes administratives, +des fiscalités, des juridictions et des instruments textuels qui donnent +à cette normativité une portée gouvernementale réelle. L'*Arthaśāstra*, +si singulier à cet égard, montre bien que la régulation du monde humain +ne relève pas seulement d'un ordre moral ou rituel, mais aussi d'un art +de gouverner, de surveiller, de prélever, de punir et d'administrer. La +cratialité y devient plus explicite, plus stratégique, parfois plus +froide, sans rompre pour autant avec l'arrière-plan statutaire et +cosmologique qui en soutient la légitimité. -Ainsi, la comparaison avec la Chine et l’Inde oblige à déplacer notre regard. Elle montre que les grandes civilisations impériales antiques n’ont pas seulement produit des variantes exotiques d’un même schéma politique ; elles ont élaboré des solutions archicratiques distinctes au problème de la co-viabilité à grande échelle. Athènes intensifiait la scène civique ; Rome épaississait la continuité normative ; la Chine articulait rite, loi et administration dans une cosmologie hiérarchisée ; l’Inde composait devoir statutaire, textualité normative et souveraineté stratégique dans une pluralité fortement différenciée d’ordres. +Ainsi, la comparaison avec la Chine et l'Inde oblige à déplacer notre +regard. Elle montre que les grandes civilisations impériales antiques +n'ont pas seulement produit des variantes exotiques d'un même schéma +politique ; elles ont élaboré des solutions archicratiques distinctes au +problème de la co-viabilité à grande échelle. Athènes intensifiait la +scène civique ; Rome épaississait la continuité normative ; la Chine +articulait rite, loi et administration dans une cosmologie hiérarchisée +; l'Inde composait devoir statutaire, textualité normative et +souveraineté stratégique dans une pluralité fortement différenciée +d'ordres. -Ce détour est essentiel, car il interdit toute provincialisation de notre typologie. L’archicratie n’a pas une seule matrice historique. Elle se laisse au contraire reconnaître dans plusieurs grandes inventions civilisationnelles du lien régulé, à condition de décrire chaque fois la manière singulière dont s’y composent fondement, puissance et scène d’épreuve. +Ce détour est essentiel, car il interdit toute provincialisation de +notre typologie. L'archicratie n'a pas une seule matrice historique. +Elle se laisse au contraire reconnaître dans plusieurs grandes +inventions civilisationnelles du lien régulé, à condition de décrire +chaque fois la manière singulière dont s'y composent fondement, +puissance et scène d'épreuve. -Au terme de ce parcours, l’Antiquité apparaît moins comme une origine unifiée de la régulation que comme un puissant champ de différenciation archicratique. Ce qui s’y laisse observer avec une netteté nouvelle, ce n’est pas l’invention soudaine de l’ordre, mais la pluralisation explicite de ses formes : ici, la scène civique de la reprise conflictuelle ; là, la continuité normative d’un monde juridiquement qualifié ; ailleurs, l’articulation du rite, de la loi, du commentaire et de l’administration ; ailleurs encore, la composition de la textualité normative, du statut et de la souveraineté. +Au terme de ce parcours, l'Antiquité apparaît moins comme une origine +unifiée de la régulation que comme un puissant champ de différenciation +archicratique. Ce qui s'y laisse observer avec une netteté nouvelle, ce +n'est pas l'invention soudaine de l'ordre, mais la pluralisation +explicite de ses formes : ici, la scène civique de la reprise +conflictuelle ; là, la continuité normative d'un monde juridiquement +qualifié ; ailleurs, l'articulation du rite, de la loi, du commentaire +et de l'administration ; ailleurs encore, la composition de la +textualité normative, du statut et de la souveraineté. -Athènes, Rome, la Chine impériale et l’Inde ancienne ne doivent donc pas être distribuées sur une même ligne de développement. Elles constituent des réponses distinctes à un problème commun : comment rendre un ordre collectif suffisamment fondé pour être reconnu, suffisamment opératoire pour durer, et suffisamment réglé pour traverser ses propres tensions. C’est en cela que ces configurations importent : chacune fait apparaître, sous une forme particulièrement lisible, une manière singulière de composer arcalité, cratialité et archicration. +Athènes, Rome, la Chine impériale et l'Inde ancienne ne doivent donc pas +être distribuées sur une même ligne de développement. Elles constituent +des réponses distinctes à un problème commun : comment rendre un ordre +collectif suffisamment fondé pour être reconnu, suffisamment opératoire +pour durer, et suffisamment réglé pour traverser ses propres tensions. +C'est en cela que ces configurations importent : chacune fait +apparaître, sous une forme particulièrement lisible, une manière +singulière de composer arcalité, cratialité et archicration. -L’apport majeur de l’Antiquité, du point de vue de notre enquête, tient précisément à cette explicitation croissante de la régulation. Non que tout y devienne transparent, juste ou universellement partageable ; mais l’ordre y est de plus en plus saisi dans des formes repérables, transmissibles, discutables ou du moins qualifiables. Il se formule dans des procédures, s’épaissit dans des statuts, se fixe dans des textes, se distribue dans des fonctions, s’inscrit dans des cosmologies ou dans des scènes civiques. La co-viabilité ne cesse pas d’être traversée par les exclusions, les hiérarchies et les asymétries ; mais elle devient davantage objectivable dans ses opérateurs propres. +L'apport majeur de l'Antiquité, du point de vue de notre enquête, tient +précisément à cette explicitation croissante de la régulation. Non que +tout y devienne transparent, juste ou universellement partageable ; mais +l'ordre y est de plus en plus saisi dans des formes repérables, +transmissibles, discutables ou du moins qualifiables. Il se formule dans +des procédures, s'épaissit dans des statuts, se fixe dans des textes, se +distribue dans des fonctions, s'inscrit dans des cosmologies ou dans des +scènes civiques. La co-viabilité ne cesse pas d'être traversée par les +exclusions, les hiérarchies et les asymétries ; mais elle devient +davantage objectivable dans ses opérateurs propres. -C’est pourquoi l’Antiquité constitue un seuil décisif dans la généalogie archicratique : non parce qu’elle accomplirait une rationalité supérieure, mais parce qu’elle rend plus visibles les formes diverses selon lesquelles une société peut instituer, porter et éprouver son ordre. Elle ne nous lègue pas un modèle, mais un éventail de solutions durablement structurantes, dont une part considérable de l’histoire ultérieure héritera, déplacera ou recomposera les tensions. +C'est pourquoi l'Antiquité constitue un seuil décisif dans la généalogie +archicratique : non parce qu'elle accomplirait une rationalité +supérieure, mais parce qu'elle rend plus visibles les formes diverses +selon lesquelles une société peut instituer, porter et éprouver son +ordre. Elle ne nous lègue pas un modèle, mais un éventail de solutions +durablement structurantes, dont une part considérable de l'histoire +ultérieure héritera, déplacera ou recomposera les tensions. -Les tableaux de synthèse présentés en annexe n’introduisent pas une typologie supplémentaire des archicrations. Ils visent uniquement à repérer, pour chaque configuration étudiée, la dominante d’archicration à partir de laquelle se laisse lire l’agencement historique considéré, sans préjuger de la pluralité des vecteurs effectivement mobilisés. Le tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule ces grandes configurations antiques de régulation explicite. +Les tableaux de synthèse présentés en annexe n'introduisent pas une +typologie supplémentaire des archicrations. Ils visent uniquement à +repérer, pour chaque configuration étudiée, la dominante d'archicration +à partir de laquelle se laisse lire l'agencement historique considéré, +sans préjuger de la pluralité des vecteurs effectivement mobilisés. Le +tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule ces grandes +configurations antiques de régulation explicite. -Mais cette explicitation du normatif n’épuise nullement le problème de la co-viabilité. Avec le Moyen Âge, la scène régulatrice se reconfigure profondément : la fragmentation des héritages impériaux, la montée en puissance des autorités religieuses et l’épaisseur croissante des liens d’allégeance déplacent le centre de gravité de l’ordre. La norme n’y sera plus d’abord portée par la publicité civique ou par la seule continuité juridique, mais davantage par la révélation, la hiérarchie sacrée, la fidélité personnelle et l’incorporation des devoirs. C’est à cette nouvelle composition des régimes de co-viabilité que sera consacrée la sous-section suivante. +Mais cette explicitation du normatif n'épuise nullement le problème de +la co-viabilité. Avec le Moyen Âge, la scène régulatrice se reconfigure +profondément : la fragmentation des héritages impériaux, la montée en +puissance des autorités religieuses et l'épaisseur croissante des liens +d'allégeance déplacent le centre de gravité de l'ordre. La norme n'y +sera plus d'abord portée par la publicité civique ou par la seule +continuité juridique, mais davantage par la révélation, la hiérarchie +sacrée, la fidélité personnelle et l'incorporation des devoirs. C'est à +cette nouvelle composition des régimes de co-viabilité que sera +consacrée la sous-section suivante. ### 2.3.2 — Régimes religieux et suzerains médiévaux : structurations hiérarchiques, théologico-rituelles et féodales -Si l’Antiquité avait rendu plus visibles des formes de régulation portées par la cité, le droit ou l’architecture impériale, le Moyen Âge déplace à nouveau le centre de gravité de la co-viabilité. L’ordre n’y repose plus prioritairement sur la publicité civique de la règle ni sur la seule continuité juridico-administrative d’un appareil politique ; il tend davantage à se soutenir par la vérité révélée, la hiérarchie des médiations, la ritualisation des dépendances et l’épaisseur mémorielle des appartenances. Il serait dès lors historiquement faux d’en faire un simple entre-deux, suspendu entre Antiquité et modernité. Le monde médiéval constitue au contraire l’un des grands laboratoires historiques de compositions archicratiques denses, durables et hautement différenciées. +Si l'Antiquité avait rendu plus visibles des formes de régulation +portées par la cité, le droit ou l'architecture impériale, le Moyen Âge +déplace à nouveau le centre de gravité de la co-viabilité. L'ordre n'y +repose plus prioritairement sur la publicité civique de la règle ni sur +la seule continuité juridico-administrative d'un appareil politique ; il +tend davantage à se soutenir par la vérité révélée, la hiérarchie des +médiations, la ritualisation des dépendances et l'épaisseur mémorielle +des appartenances. Il serait dès lors historiquement faux d'en faire un +simple entre-deux, suspendu entre Antiquité et modernité. Le monde +médiéval constitue au contraire l'un des grands laboratoires historiques +de compositions archicratiques denses, durables et hautement +différenciées. -Ce qui s’y transforme n’est pas l’existence même de la régulation, mais son mode d’ancrage. L’arcalité s’y noue plus fortement à des sources transcendantes, lignagères ou rituelles ; la cratialité se distribue dans des chaînes de médiation plus épaisses, souvent imbriquées ; l’archicration se déploie dans des formes où l’écriture, le serment, le commentaire, la mémoire orale, la liturgie ou la jurisprudence se relaient sans cesse. Il en résulte des régimes de co-viabilité qui ne sont ni moins structurés ni moins puissants que ceux de l’Antiquité, mais dont la logique propre tient à l’enchâssement de l’ordre dans des hiérarchies de salut, de fidélité, d’interprétation ou de coutume. +Ce qui s'y transforme n'est pas l'existence même de la régulation, mais +son mode d'ancrage. L'arcalité s'y noue plus fortement à des sources +transcendantes, lignagères ou rituelles ; la cratialité se distribue +dans des chaînes de médiation plus épaisses, souvent imbriquées ; +l'archicration se déploie dans des formes où l'écriture, le serment, le +commentaire, la mémoire orale, la liturgie ou la jurisprudence se +relaient sans cesse. Il en résulte des régimes de co-viabilité qui ne +sont ni moins structurés ni moins puissants que ceux de l'Antiquité, +mais dont la logique propre tient à l'enchâssement de l'ordre dans des +hiérarchies de salut, de fidélité, d'interprétation ou de coutume. -La chrétienté latine médiévale fournit un premier cas majeur de cette recomposition. Elle importe ici non comme modèle exclusif du Moyen Âge, mais comme configuration particulièrement lisible d’un régime archicratique fondé sur la transcendance administrée. À partir de la consolidation ecclésiale et, plus nettement encore, de la réforme grégorienne, l’Église latine ne se borne pas à encadrer une croyance : elle constitue un appareil de régulation étendu, capable d’ordonner les conduites, de hiérarchiser les fonctions, de qualifier les déviances et d’inscrire le salut lui-même dans une économie normative de la correction. +La chrétienté latine médiévale fournit un premier cas majeur de cette +recomposition. Elle importe ici non comme modèle exclusif du Moyen Âge, +mais comme configuration particulièrement lisible d'un régime +archicratique fondé sur la transcendance administrée. À partir de la +consolidation ecclésiale et, plus nettement encore, de la réforme +grégorienne, l'Église latine ne se borne pas à encadrer une croyance : +elle constitue un appareil de régulation étendu, capable d'ordonner les +conduites, de hiérarchiser les fonctions, de qualifier les déviances et +d'inscrire le salut lui-même dans une économie normative de la +correction. -L’arcalité chrétienne y est d’abord transcendante et verticale. Elle s’origine dans la révélation, dans l’autorité scripturaire, dans la figure du Christ, dans la tradition apostolique et dans l’institution ecclésiale comme médiation autorisée de cette vérité. Mais cette transcendance n’est pas laissée à l’état d’énoncé abstrait : elle prend corps dans des dispositifs visibles — liturgie, architecture sacrée, hiérarchie cléricale, découpage du temps religieux, distribution des sacrements — qui rendent l’ordre divin socialement habitable. La norme ne vaut pas seulement parce qu’elle est dite vraie ; elle vaut parce qu’elle se trouve déposée dans une trame terrestre de lieux, de gestes, de rythmes et de fonctions qui la rendent continuellement présente. +L'arcalité chrétienne y est d'abord transcendante et verticale. Elle +s'origine dans la révélation, dans l'autorité scripturaire, dans la +figure du Christ, dans la tradition apostolique et dans l'institution +ecclésiale comme médiation autorisée de cette vérité. Mais cette +transcendance n'est pas laissée à l'état d'énoncé abstrait : elle prend +corps dans des dispositifs visibles — liturgie, architecture sacrée, +hiérarchie cléricale, découpage du temps religieux, distribution des +sacrements — qui rendent l'ordre divin socialement habitable. La norme +ne vaut pas seulement parce qu'elle est dite vraie ; elle vaut parce +qu'elle se trouve déposée dans une trame terrestre de lieux, de gestes, +de rythmes et de fonctions qui la rendent continuellement présente. -La cratialité se déploie alors sous une forme pastorale et disciplinaire d’une grande intensité. Comme l’a montré Foucault, le christianisme latin médiéval ne gouverne pas principalement par l’occupation exhaustive du territoire, mais par la conduite des conduites, par l’examen des âmes, par l’obligation de vérité imposée aux sujets sur eux-mêmes. Confession, pénitence, direction de conscience, correction fraternelle, surveillance des mœurs, qualification des fautes : autant de dispositifs qui font de l’intériorité elle-même un lieu de régulation. L’autorité ecclésiale n’agit donc pas seulement sur des actes extérieurs ; elle s’exerce sur les intentions, sur les désirs, sur les manières de se rapporter à soi et au salut. +La cratialité se déploie alors sous une forme pastorale et disciplinaire +d'une grande intensité. Comme l'a montré Foucault, le christianisme +latin médiéval ne gouverne pas principalement par l'occupation +exhaustive du territoire, mais par la conduite des conduites, par +l'examen des âmes, par l'obligation de vérité imposée aux sujets sur +eux-mêmes. Confession, pénitence, direction de conscience, correction +fraternelle, surveillance des mœurs, qualification des fautes : autant +de dispositifs qui font de l'intériorité elle-même un lieu de +régulation. L'autorité ecclésiale n'agit donc pas seulement sur des +actes extérieurs ; elle s'exerce sur les intentions, sur les désirs, sur +les manières de se rapporter à soi et au salut. -L’archicration chrétienne atteint, dans ce cadre, un degré remarquable d’institutionnalisation. Avec la montée du droit canonique, l’accumulation des décrétales, la systématisation des autorités et le travail scolastique de commentaire, la normativité ecclésiale devient cumulative, interprétative et transmissible. Elle ne repose pas sur la seule répétition du dogme, mais sur un appareil de qualification qui permet de trancher, de corriger, d’ordonner et de hiérarchiser. Le Décret de Gratien marque ici un seuil décisif : non parce qu’il inventerait ex nihilo la normativité chrétienne, mais parce qu’il contribue à la rendre plus cohérente, plus mobilisable, plus généralisable à l’échelle d’un espace latin élargi. +L'archicration chrétienne atteint, dans ce cadre, un degré remarquable +d'institutionnalisation. Avec la montée du droit canonique, +l'accumulation des décrétales, la systématisation des autorités et le +travail scolastique de commentaire, la normativité ecclésiale devient +cumulative, interprétative et transmissible. Elle ne repose pas sur la +seule répétition du dogme, mais sur un appareil de qualification qui +permet de trancher, de corriger, d'ordonner et de hiérarchiser. Le +Décret de Gratien marque ici un seuil décisif : non parce qu'il +inventerait ex nihilo la normativité chrétienne, mais parce qu'il +contribue à la rendre plus cohérente, plus mobilisable, plus +généralisable à l'échelle d'un espace latin élargi. -Il faut toutefois tenir ensemble la puissance intégratrice et la violence potentielle de ce régime. La chrétienté médiévale ne produit pas seulement une économie du salut ; elle institue aussi une normativité exclusive, portée à distinguer l’orthodoxie de l’hérésie, le licite de l’illicite, le pur de l’impur, le conforme du déviant. L’ordre qu’elle soutient n’est donc nullement neutre. Il promet la rédemption, mais distribue aussi l’exclusion ; il organise la charité, mais rend possibles la censure, la condamnation et la répression ; il construit un monde intelligible, mais au prix d’une forte réduction de la pluralité recevable. En ce sens, la chrétienté latine constitue bien un régime archicratique majeur : non parce qu’elle pacifierait le monde, mais parce qu’elle parvient à suturer très largement la co-viabilité sociale, morale et symbolique sous l’autorité d’une vérité révélée institutionnellement administrée. +Il faut toutefois tenir ensemble la puissance intégratrice et la +violence potentielle de ce régime. La chrétienté médiévale ne produit +pas seulement une économie du salut ; elle institue aussi une +normativité exclusive, portée à distinguer l'orthodoxie de l'hérésie, le +licite de l'illicite, le pur de l'impur, le conforme du déviant. L'ordre +qu'elle soutient n'est donc nullement neutre. Il promet la rédemption, +mais distribue aussi l'exclusion ; il organise la charité, mais rend +possibles la censure, la condamnation et la répression ; il construit un +monde intelligible, mais au prix d'une forte réduction de la pluralité +recevable. En ce sens, la chrétienté latine constitue bien un régime +archicratique majeur : non parce qu'elle pacifierait le monde, mais +parce qu'elle parvient à suturer très largement la co-viabilité sociale, +morale et symbolique sous l'autorité d'une vérité révélée +institutionnellement administrée. -À côté du régime ecclésial, l’Europe médiévale déploie une configuration d’une autre nature, plus segmentée, plus territorialisée, plus interpersonnelle, mais nullement moins structurée : celle que l’on désigne, avec toutes les précautions nécessaires, comme régime féodal. Il faut ici se garder de deux simplifications symétriques : y voir soit une simple anarchie post-impériale, soit au contraire un système parfaitement unifié. Ce qui importe pour notre enquête est moins la querelle terminologique que la logique régulatrice effectivement à l’œuvre : un ordre dans lequel la co-viabilité se soutient par l’épaisseur des fidélités, par la mémoire des engagements, par la coutume localisée et par la ritualisation des dépendances. +À côté du régime ecclésial, l'Europe médiévale déploie une configuration +d'une autre nature, plus segmentée, plus territorialisée, plus +interpersonnelle, mais nullement moins structurée : celle que l'on +désigne, avec toutes les précautions nécessaires, comme régime féodal. +Il faut ici se garder de deux simplifications symétriques : y voir soit +une simple anarchie post-impériale, soit au contraire un système +parfaitement unifié. Ce qui importe pour notre enquête est moins la +querelle terminologique que la logique régulatrice effectivement à +l'œuvre : un ordre dans lequel la co-viabilité se soutient par +l'épaisseur des fidélités, par la mémoire des engagements, par la +coutume localisée et par la ritualisation des dépendances. -L’arcalité féodale ne repose ni sur une révélation fondatrice au sens strict, ni sur une normativité générale abstraitement formulée. Elle s’ancre dans des terres, des lignages, des titres, des généalogies, des gestes d’hommage, des emblèmes, des châteaux, des précédents, bref dans tout un monde où l’ancienneté reconnue, la visibilité des appartenances et la continuité des transmissions donnent au lien social sa consistance. Le fief, à cet égard, n’est pas seulement une unité économique ou militaire : il est une forme de fixation symbolique et matérielle de l’obligation. L’ordre se rend recevable parce qu’il est localisé, incarné et mémorisable. +L'arcalité féodale ne repose ni sur une révélation fondatrice au sens +strict, ni sur une normativité générale abstraitement formulée. Elle +s'ancre dans des terres, des lignages, des titres, des généalogies, des +gestes d'hommage, des emblèmes, des châteaux, des précédents, bref dans +tout un monde où l'ancienneté reconnue, la visibilité des appartenances +et la continuité des transmissions donnent au lien social sa +consistance. Le fief, à cet égard, n'est pas seulement une unité +économique ou militaire : il est une forme de fixation symbolique et +matérielle de l'obligation. L'ordre se rend recevable parce qu'il est +localisé, incarné et mémorisable. -La cratialité se présente, quant à elle, sous une forme polycentrique. Elle ne procède pas d’un centre souverain unique, mais d’un enchevêtrement de puissances partielles : seigneurs, vassaux, évêques, abbés, princes, communautés urbaines, juridictions locales. Un même individu peut relever simultanément de plusieurs chaînes d’obligation, devoir service ici, conseil là, fidélité ailleurs. Cette pluralité n’est pas un accident du système ; elle en constitue l’un des principes de fonctionnement. Le pouvoir y est distribué, négocié, chevauchant, souvent conflictuel, mais néanmoins intelligible pour les acteurs parce qu’il s’inscrit dans une grammaire relativement stable de la dépendance réciproque, de la protection due et de l’honneur engagé. +La cratialité se présente, quant à elle, sous une forme polycentrique. +Elle ne procède pas d'un centre souverain unique, mais d'un +enchevêtrement de puissances partielles : seigneurs, vassaux, évêques, +abbés, princes, communautés urbaines, juridictions locales. Un même +individu peut relever simultanément de plusieurs chaînes d'obligation, +devoir service ici, conseil là, fidélité ailleurs. Cette pluralité n'est +pas un accident du système ; elle en constitue l'un des principes de +fonctionnement. Le pouvoir y est distribué, négocié, chevauchant, +souvent conflictuel, mais néanmoins intelligible pour les acteurs parce +qu'il s'inscrit dans une grammaire relativement stable de la dépendance +réciproque, de la protection due et de l'honneur engagé. -L’archicration féodale s’exerce principalement dans les scènes où ces liens sont formés, rappelés, éprouvés, contestés ou réajustés. Hommage, serment, conseil de pairs, justice seigneuriale, arbitrage, compensation, coutume rappelée : autant de dispositifs par lesquels la norme ne se présente pas d’abord comme un texte universel, mais comme une obligation située, rendue valide par la reconnaissance mutuelle et par une répétition socialement contrôlée. Ce n’est pas l’absence d’écriture qui caractérise ici le régime, mais le fait que l’écriture, lorsqu’elle apparaît, vienne le plus souvent seconder, consigner ou fixer des usages déjà tenus pour recevables. La normativité ne part pas du code ; elle remonte au précédent. +L'archicration féodale s'exerce principalement dans les scènes où ces +liens sont formés, rappelés, éprouvés, contestés ou réajustés. Hommage, +serment, conseil de pairs, justice seigneuriale, arbitrage, +compensation, coutume rappelée : autant de dispositifs par lesquels la +norme ne se présente pas d'abord comme un texte universel, mais comme +une obligation située, rendue valide par la reconnaissance mutuelle et +par une répétition socialement contrôlée. Ce n'est pas l'absence +d'écriture qui caractérise ici le régime, mais le fait que l'écriture, +lorsqu'elle apparaît, vienne le plus souvent seconder, consigner ou +fixer des usages déjà tenus pour recevables. La normativité ne part pas +du code ; elle remonte au précédent. -C’est pourquoi les analyses de Marc Bloch demeurent ici décisives, même si elles doivent être relues à la lumière des correctifs apportés par Susan Reynolds ou Dominique Barthélemy. La féodalité n’est ni un bloc doctrinal parfaitement clos, ni une pure invention des juristes postérieurs ; elle désigne, pour nous, une famille de configurations dans lesquelles la régulation tient par la prévisibilité des engagements personnels, par la territorialisation des rapports d’autorité et par la capacité des communautés concernées à reconnaître ce qui vaut comme fidélité, manquement, réparation ou rupture légitime. +C'est pourquoi les analyses de Marc Bloch demeurent ici décisives, même +si elles doivent être relues à la lumière des correctifs apportés par +Susan Reynolds ou Dominique Barthélemy. La féodalité n'est ni un bloc +doctrinal parfaitement clos, ni une pure invention des juristes +postérieurs ; elle désigne, pour nous, une famille de configurations +dans lesquelles la régulation tient par la prévisibilité des engagements +personnels, par la territorialisation des rapports d'autorité et par la +capacité des communautés concernées à reconnaître ce qui vaut comme +fidélité, manquement, réparation ou rupture légitime. -Il faut enfin tenir ensemble la robustesse régulatrice de ce monde et sa violence constitutive. Le régime féodal n’abolit nullement le conflit ; il l’encadre à travers des formes spécifiques de guerre, de vengeance, de duel, de compensation ou de pacification. Les Paix de Dieu et Trêves de Dieu montrent bien que cette conflictualité n’est pas extérieure au système : elle en est l’un des éléments à canaliser, non à supprimer. La féodalité ne produit donc ni un ordre pacifié ni une confusion anarchique ; elle institue une co-viabilité stratifiée, fortement inégalitaire, mais durable, où la règle tient moins à son universalité qu’à la reconnaissance localement partagée de ce que chacun doit à chacun selon son rang, son lien et sa terre. +Il faut enfin tenir ensemble la robustesse régulatrice de ce monde et sa +violence constitutive. Le régime féodal n'abolit nullement le conflit ; +il l'encadre à travers des formes spécifiques de guerre, de vengeance, +de duel, de compensation ou de pacification. Les Paix de Dieu et Trêves +de Dieu montrent bien que cette conflictualité n'est pas extérieure au +système : elle en est l'un des éléments à canaliser, non à supprimer. La +féodalité ne produit donc ni un ordre pacifié ni une confusion +anarchique ; elle institue une co-viabilité stratifiée, fortement +inégalitaire, mais durable, où la règle tient moins à son universalité +qu'à la reconnaissance localement partagée de ce que chacun doit à +chacun selon son rang, son lien et sa terre. -Le monde islamique médiéval constitue, lui aussi, l’un des grands cas de régulation archicratique non réductible au modèle étatique centralisé. Sa singularité ne tient pas à l’absence de pouvoir, mais à la manière dont la normativité s’y distribue entre révélation, tradition prophétique, élaboration savante et autorités politiques inégalement stabilisées. L’ordre n’y repose ni sur une Église constituée comme dans la chrétienté latine, ni sur une souveraineté législative pleinement autonome, mais sur une articulation dense entre texte révélé, interprétation autorisée et mise en pratique communautaire. +Le monde islamique médiéval constitue, lui aussi, l'un des grands cas de +régulation archicratique non réductible au modèle étatique centralisé. +Sa singularité ne tient pas à l'absence de pouvoir, mais à la manière +dont la normativité s'y distribue entre révélation, tradition +prophétique, élaboration savante et autorités politiques inégalement +stabilisées. L'ordre n'y repose ni sur une Église constituée comme dans +la chrétienté latine, ni sur une souveraineté législative pleinement +autonome, mais sur une articulation dense entre texte révélé, +interprétation autorisée et mise en pratique communautaire. -L’arcalité y est d’abord scripturo-prophétique. Le Coran, la Sunna et la mémoire normative du Prophète forment une source de fondation qui ne vaut pas seulement comme référence spirituelle, mais comme principe d’orientation du monde humain. Toutefois, cette arcalité ne se réduit pas à la simple présence d’un texte sacré : elle passe par tout un travail de transmission, de sélection, de hiérarchisation et de validation des sources. Le fondement n’est donc jamais brut ; il est médié par une culture savante de l’autorité textuelle, du commentaire et de la chaîne de transmission. +L'arcalité y est d'abord scripturo-prophétique. Le Coran, la Sunna et la +mémoire normative du Prophète forment une source de fondation qui ne +vaut pas seulement comme référence spirituelle, mais comme principe +d'orientation du monde humain. Toutefois, cette arcalité ne se réduit +pas à la simple présence d'un texte sacré : elle passe par tout un +travail de transmission, de sélection, de hiérarchisation et de +validation des sources. Le fondement n'est donc jamais brut ; il est +médié par une culture savante de l'autorité textuelle, du commentaire et +de la chaîne de transmission. -La cratialité, quant à elle, se présente sous une forme double et structurellement tendue. D’un côté, les détenteurs du pouvoir politique — califes, sultans, émirs, gouverneurs — exercent des fonctions d’administration, de commandement, de prélèvement et de police de l’ordre. De l’autre, les ʿulamāʾ, fuqahāʾ, muftīs et qāḍīs concentrent une autorité normative qui ne se laisse pas purement absorber par le pouvoir princier. Il en résulte une distribution complexe de la puissance : ni théocratie unifiée, ni séparation nette du politique et du normatif, mais une configuration où la légitimité du pouvoir dépend étroitement de son rapport à une normativité savamment élaborée qu’il ne maîtrise jamais absolument. +La cratialité, quant à elle, se présente sous une forme double et +structurellement tendue. D'un côté, les détenteurs du pouvoir politique — califes, sultans, émirs, gouverneurs — exercent des fonctions +d'administration, de commandement, de prélèvement et de police de +l'ordre. De l'autre, les ʿulamāʾ, fuqahāʾ, muftīs et qāḍīs concentrent +une autorité normative qui ne se laisse pas purement absorber par le +pouvoir princier. Il en résulte une distribution complexe de la +puissance : ni théocratie unifiée, ni séparation nette du politique et +du normatif, mais une configuration où la légitimité du pouvoir dépend +étroitement de son rapport à une normativité savamment élaborée qu'il ne +maîtrise jamais absolument. -C’est dans l’archicration que ce régime donne toute sa mesure. La production de la règle n’y procède pas prioritairement d’un acte législatif souverain, mais d’une activité interprétative réglée : élaboration du fiqh, hiérarchisation des sources, usage du qiyās, référence à l’ijmāʿ, consultation juridique, fatwā, jugement, enseignement. La norme s’y stabilise par des opérations herméneutiques et pédagogiques qui la rendent à la fois transmissible, discutable dans certaines limites, et socialement opérante. L’ordre n’est donc pas simplement imposé ; il est sans cesse reconduit par une culture de l’interprétation autorisée. +C'est dans l'archicration que ce régime donne toute sa mesure. La +production de la règle n'y procède pas prioritairement d'un acte +législatif souverain, mais d'une activité interprétative réglée : +élaboration du fiqh, hiérarchisation des sources, usage du qiyās, +référence à l'ijmāʿ, consultation juridique, fatwā, jugement, +enseignement. La norme s'y stabilise par des opérations herméneutiques +et pédagogiques qui la rendent à la fois transmissible, discutable dans +certaines limites, et socialement opérante. L'ordre n'est donc pas +simplement imposé ; il est sans cesse reconduit par une culture de +l'interprétation autorisée. -Cette puissance régulatrice est considérable. Elle permet de produire de la cohérence normative à grande échelle sans recourir nécessairement à une centralisation politique absolue. Mais elle n’est nullement exempte d’asymétries. L’accès à l’interprétation légitime demeure fortement hiérarchisé ; les statuts de sexe, de confession, de savoir et de position sociale pèsent lourdement sur la distribution effective des capacités de parole et de qualification. Le pluralisme des écoles juridiques ne doit donc pas être idéalisé : il constitue une forme de différenciation régulée, non une égalité générale d’accès à la normativité. +Cette puissance régulatrice est considérable. Elle permet de produire de +la cohérence normative à grande échelle sans recourir nécessairement à +une centralisation politique absolue. Mais elle n'est nullement exempte +d'asymétries. L'accès à l'interprétation légitime demeure fortement +hiérarchisé ; les statuts de sexe, de confession, de savoir et de +position sociale pèsent lourdement sur la distribution effective des +capacités de parole et de qualification. Le pluralisme des écoles +juridiques ne doit donc pas être idéalisé : il constitue une forme de +différenciation régulée, non une égalité générale d'accès à la +normativité. -Ce régime nous importe ainsi pour une raison précise : il montre qu’une co-viabilité hautement structurée peut se soutenir sans monopole étatique intégral, à partir d’une articulation puissante entre révélation, science juridique et validation communautaire. L’islam classique n’offre pas un dehors exotique à notre typologie ; il en constitue l’une des expressions les plus rigoureuses, où l’archicration prend la forme d’une élaboration savante de la norme sous fondement prophétique, avec toute la force mais aussi toutes les limites d’un tel montage. +Ce régime nous importe ainsi pour une raison précise : il montre qu'une +co-viabilité hautement structurée peut se soutenir sans monopole +étatique intégral, à partir d'une articulation puissante entre +révélation, science juridique et validation communautaire. L'islam +classique n'offre pas un dehors exotique à notre typologie ; il en +constitue l'une des expressions les plus rigoureuses, où l'archicration +prend la forme d'une élaboration savante de la norme sous fondement +prophétique, avec toute la force mais aussi toutes les limites d'un tel +montage. -Dans un registre encore différent, les empires ouest-africains médiévaux — notamment le Manden Kurufa (Empire du Mali) et l’Empire Songhaï — donnent à voir une configuration archicratique dans laquelle la normativité ne repose ni sur une codification écrite dominante, ni sur une centralisation bureaucratique étatique, mais sur une articulation structurée entre mémoire, parole et médiation. +Dans un registre encore différent, les empires ouest-africains médiévaux — notamment le Manden Kurufa (Empire du Mali) et l'Empire Songhaï — donnent à voir une configuration archicratique dans laquelle la +normativité ne repose ni sur une codification écrite dominante, ni sur +une centralisation bureaucratique étatique, mais sur une articulation +structurée entre mémoire, parole et médiation. -L’arcalité y est fondamentalement mémorielle et lignagère. Elle se forme dans les récits d’origine, les généalogies, les épopées, les proverbes et les savoirs transmis par les détenteurs autorisés de la parole, en particulier les djeliw. Cette mémoire n’est pas un simple dépôt du passé : elle constitue une réserve normative active, à partir de laquelle les situations présentes peuvent être qualifiées, comparées et orientées. Le fondement n’est donc pas fixé dans un texte clos, mais maintenu dans une tradition vivante, structurée et socialement reconnue. +L'arcalité y est fondamentalement mémorielle et lignagère. Elle se forme +dans les récits d'origine, les généalogies, les épopées, les proverbes +et les savoirs transmis par les détenteurs autorisés de la parole, en +particulier les djeliw. Cette mémoire n'est pas un simple dépôt du passé +: elle constitue une réserve normative active, à partir de laquelle les +situations présentes peuvent être qualifiées, comparées et orientées. Le +fondement n'est donc pas fixé dans un texte clos, mais maintenu dans une +tradition vivante, structurée et socialement reconnue. -La cratialité se distribue selon une logique polycentrique. Le pouvoir ne s’y concentre pas dans une instance unique : souverains, chefs lignagers, autorités religieuses, responsables de marché et conseils de sages participent, selon des configurations variables, à la régulation des situations. Cette pluralité n’implique pas absence d’ordre, mais organisation de la complémentarité et de la hiérarchisation des rôles. L’autorité y est relationnelle, indexée à la position, à l’ancienneté, à la compétence reconnue et à la capacité de médiation. +La cratialité se distribue selon une logique polycentrique. Le pouvoir +ne s'y concentre pas dans une instance unique : souverains, chefs +lignagers, autorités religieuses, responsables de marché et conseils de +sages participent, selon des configurations variables, à la régulation +des situations. Cette pluralité n'implique pas absence d'ordre, mais +organisation de la complémentarité et de la hiérarchisation des rôles. +L'autorité y est relationnelle, indexée à la position, à l'ancienneté, à +la compétence reconnue et à la capacité de médiation. -L’archicration s’exerce principalement à travers des dispositifs oraux et performatifs : palabres, arbitrages collectifs, serments, compensations, exclusions symboliques. La norme n’y apparaît pas comme une règle abstraite préalablement fixée, mais comme le résultat d’un processus de mise en accord, inscrit dans des formes ritualisées de parole et de décision. La régulation vise moins à sanctionner qu’à rétablir des équilibres, en réinscrivant les conflits dans un horizon de continuité du lien social. +L'archicration s'exerce principalement à travers des dispositifs oraux +et performatifs : palabres, arbitrages collectifs, serments, +compensations, exclusions symboliques. La norme n'y apparaît pas comme +une règle abstraite préalablement fixée, mais comme le résultat d'un +processus de mise en accord, inscrit dans des formes ritualisées de +parole et de décision. La régulation vise moins à sanctionner qu'à +rétablir des équilibres, en réinscrivant les conflits dans un horizon de +continuité du lien social. -Une telle configuration présente une cohérence propre et une efficacité réelle : elle permet de produire de la co-viabilité sans recourir à une formalisation juridique systématique ni à un appareil étatique centralisé. Mais elle demeure traversée par des hiérarchies fortes et des asymétries de position. La maîtrise de la parole légitime, l’accès à la mémoire autorisée et la capacité de médiation constituent des ressources de pouvoir inégalement distribuées. Loin d’être un espace d’indifférenciation, ce régime articule étroitement normativité partagée et stratification sociale. +Une telle configuration présente une cohérence propre et une efficacité +réelle : elle permet de produire de la co-viabilité sans recourir à une +formalisation juridique systématique ni à un appareil étatique +centralisé. Mais elle demeure traversée par des hiérarchies fortes et +des asymétries de position. La maîtrise de la parole légitime, l'accès à +la mémoire autorisée et la capacité de médiation constituent des +ressources de pouvoir inégalement distribuées. Loin d'être un espace +d'indifférenciation, ce régime articule étroitement normativité partagée +et stratification sociale. -Ces formations ouest-africaines montrent ainsi qu’une archicration pleinement opérante peut se déployer à partir d’une mémoire instituée, d’une parole réglée et d’une médiation collective, sans dépendre prioritairement ni de l’écriture juridique, ni d’une souveraineté centralisée. Elles constituent, à ce titre, l’une des expressions les plus nettes d’une archicration médiévale fondée sur la mémoire instituée et la médiation collective. +Ces formations ouest-africaines montrent ainsi qu'une archicration +pleinement opérante peut se déployer à partir d'une mémoire instituée, +d'une parole réglée et d'une médiation collective, sans dépendre +prioritairement ni de l'écriture juridique, ni d'une souveraineté +centralisée. Elles constituent, à ce titre, l'une des expressions les +plus nettes d'une archicration médiévale fondée sur la mémoire instituée +et la médiation collective. -Au terme de ce parcours, les régimes religieux et suzerains médiévaux apparaissent moins comme des formes inachevées de l’État que comme des compositions archicratiques pleinement consistantes, fondées sur d’autres principes de régulation. La co-viabilité y est portée non par l’unification d’un centre souverain, mais par l’entrecroisement de médiations théologiques, coutumières, lignagères, savantes ou rituelles, chacune articulant à sa manière fondement, autorité et scène d’épreuve. +Au terme de ce parcours, les régimes religieux et suzerains médiévaux +apparaissent moins comme des formes inachevées de l'État que comme des +compositions archicratiques pleinement consistantes, fondées sur +d'autres principes de régulation. La co-viabilité y est portée non par +l'unification d'un centre souverain, mais par l'entrecroisement de +médiations théologiques, coutumières, lignagères, savantes ou rituelles, +chacune articulant à sa manière fondement, autorité et scène d'épreuve. -La Chrétienté latine, la féodalité européenne, l’islam classique et les empires ouest-africains médiévaux ne relèvent donc pas d’un même modèle. Tous donnent pourtant à voir une même propriété structurale : l’ordre peut se maintenir sans publicité civique généralisée ni codification étatique unifiée, dès lors qu’existent des formes reconnues de légitimation, des autorités capables de les porter et des scènes où les tensions peuvent être traitées sans dissoudre l’ensemble. Ce qui varie, ce n’est pas l’existence d’une régulation, mais la manière dont elle se laisse fonder, distribuer et rejouer. +La Chrétienté latine, la féodalité européenne, l'islam classique et les +empires ouest-africains médiévaux ne relèvent donc pas d'un même modèle. +Tous donnent pourtant à voir une même propriété structurale : l'ordre +peut se maintenir sans publicité civique généralisée ni codification +étatique unifiée, dès lors qu'existent des formes reconnues de +légitimation, des autorités capables de les porter et des scènes où les +tensions peuvent être traitées sans dissoudre l'ensemble. Ce qui varie, +ce n'est pas l'existence d'une régulation, mais la manière dont elle se +laisse fonder, distribuer et rejouer. -L’apport décisif du Moyen Âge, dans la perspective qui est la nôtre, est précisément là. Il montre que la normativité peut tenir par la révélation, par la fidélité personnelle, par la mémoire coutumière, par l’interprétation savante ou par la médiation réparatrice, sans passer d’abord par la forme moderne de la loi souveraine. Ces mondes ne sont ni pré-politiques ni infra-régulés ; ils configurent autrement la scène archicratique, en la rendant plus segmentée, plus stratifiée, plus incarnée, parfois plus diffuse, mais nullement moins opérante. +L'apport décisif du Moyen Âge, dans la perspective qui est la nôtre, est +précisément là. Il montre que la normativité peut tenir par la +révélation, par la fidélité personnelle, par la mémoire coutumière, par +l'interprétation savante ou par la médiation réparatrice, sans passer +d'abord par la forme moderne de la loi souveraine. Ces mondes ne sont ni +pré-politiques ni infra-régulés ; ils configurent autrement la scène +archicratique, en la rendant plus segmentée, plus stratifiée, plus +incarnée, parfois plus diffuse, mais nullement moins opérante. -Un tableau de synthèse de ces grandes configurations médiévales est présenté en annexe. La transition vers les monarchies renaissantes ne devra pas être pensée comme le simple dépassement de ces formes, mais comme une reconfiguration profonde de leurs équilibres. Avec la centralisation monarchique, la montée de l’État dynastique et la systématisation croissante des appareils de commandement, un autre agencement se met en place : non plus la pluralité dense des médiations religieuses, féodales ou coutumières, mais la tentative de les capter, de les hiérarchiser et de les intégrer dans une nouvelle architecture de souveraineté. C’est cette mutation qu’examine la sous-section suivante. +Un tableau de synthèse de ces grandes configurations médiévales est +présenté en annexe. La transition vers les monarchies renaissantes ne +devra pas être pensée comme le simple dépassement de ces formes, mais +comme une reconfiguration profonde de leurs équilibres. Avec la +centralisation monarchique, la montée de l'État dynastique et la +systématisation croissante des appareils de commandement, un autre +agencement se met en place : non plus la pluralité dense des médiations +religieuses, féodales ou coutumières, mais la tentative de les capter, +de les hiérarchiser et de les intégrer dans une nouvelle architecture de +souveraineté. C'est cette mutation qu'examine la sous-section suivante. ### 2.3.3 — Régimes monarchiques renaissants : centralisation, sacralisation et rationalisation du pouvoir -Le moment monarchique renaissant ne doit pas être compris comme le simple renforcement quantitatif de l’autorité royale. Il désigne une reconfiguration plus profonde de la co-viabilité politique, dans laquelle l’ordre cesse d’être principalement porté par l’entrelacs médiéval des médiations féodales, ecclésiales et coutumières pour se recentrer autour d’un principe de souveraineté de plus en plus unifié. Ce qui se transforme alors n’est pas seulement la puissance du roi, mais le statut même de la norme, la scène de son énonciation et les conditions de son effectuation. +Le moment monarchique renaissant ne doit pas être compris comme le +simple renforcement quantitatif de l'autorité royale. Il désigne une +reconfiguration plus profonde de la co-viabilité politique, dans +laquelle l'ordre cesse d'être principalement porté par l'entrelacs +médiéval des médiations féodales, ecclésiales et coutumières pour se +recentrer autour d'un principe de souveraineté de plus en plus unifié. +Ce qui se transforme alors n'est pas seulement la puissance du roi, mais +le statut même de la norme, la scène de son énonciation et les +conditions de son effectuation. -Il serait toutefois simplificateur de lire cette mutation comme l’avènement immédiat d’un État moderne pleinement formé. Les monarchies des XVe et XVIe siècles composent encore avec des héritages médiévaux puissants, des résistances territoriales, des privilèges, des juridictions concurrentes et des légitimités entremêlées. Mais elles introduisent un déplacement décisif : l’ordre tend désormais à se fonder moins sur la pluralité des appartenances que sur la capacité d’un centre souverain à produire, hiérarchiser, diffuser et faire exécuter la règle. +Il serait toutefois simplificateur de lire cette mutation comme +l'avènement immédiat d'un État moderne pleinement formé. Les monarchies +des XVe et XVIe siècles composent encore avec des héritages médiévaux +puissants, des résistances territoriales, des privilèges, des +juridictions concurrentes et des légitimités entremêlées. Mais elles +introduisent un déplacement décisif : l'ordre tend désormais à se fonder +moins sur la pluralité des appartenances que sur la capacité d'un centre +souverain à produire, hiérarchiser, diffuser et faire exécuter la règle. -Dans cette inflexion, trois mouvements doivent être tenus ensemble. D’abord, une concentration nouvelle de l’arcalité autour de la figure royale, qui devient moins garante d’un ordre reçu que principe d’un ordre à produire. Ensuite, une consolidation de la cratialité, par laquelle la puissance cesse d’être seulement segmentée ou négociée pour se doter d’appareils plus continus de commandement, de prélèvement, de contrôle et de relais. Enfin, une rationalisation croissante de l’archicration, portée par l’essor des écritures administratives, de l’imprimé, de la formalisation juridique et des premières techniques d’encadrement. +Dans cette inflexion, trois mouvements doivent être tenus ensemble. +D'abord, une concentration nouvelle de l'arcalité autour de la figure +royale, qui devient moins garante d'un ordre reçu que principe d'un +ordre à produire. Ensuite, une consolidation de la cratialité, par +laquelle la puissance cesse d'être seulement segmentée ou négociée pour +se doter d'appareils plus continus de commandement, de prélèvement, de +contrôle et de relais. Enfin, une rationalisation croissante de +l'archicration, portée par l'essor des écritures administratives, de +l'imprimé, de la formalisation juridique et des premières techniques +d'encadrement. -C’est en ce sens qu’il faut lire les monarchies renaissantes : non comme la simple survivance augmentée de la royauté médiévale, mais comme une configuration archicratique nouvelle, dans laquelle la souveraineté tend à devenir à la fois fondement, opérateur et scène d’intelligibilité de l’ordre. Machiavel, Bodin et Hobbes ne seront donc pas ici convoqués comme trois penseurs isolés, mais comme les témoins doctrinaux d’un même déplacement historique : celui par lequel la régulation se détache progressivement de la coutume, de la seule légitimation théologique ou du tissu féodal des obligations pour s’adosser à un centre de décision plus abstrait, plus continu et plus producteur de normativité. +C'est en ce sens qu'il faut lire les monarchies renaissantes : non comme +la simple survivance augmentée de la royauté médiévale, mais comme une +configuration archicratique nouvelle, dans laquelle la souveraineté tend +à devenir à la fois fondement, opérateur et scène d'intelligibilité de +l'ordre. Machiavel, Bodin et Hobbes ne seront donc pas ici convoqués +comme trois penseurs isolés, mais comme les témoins doctrinaux d'un même +déplacement historique : celui par lequel la régulation se détache +progressivement de la coutume, de la seule légitimation théologique ou +du tissu féodal des obligations pour s'adosser à un centre de décision +plus abstrait, plus continu et plus producteur de normativité. -Avec les monarchies renaissantes, l’arcalité subit un déplacement décisif. Elle ne disparaît pas dans un pur arbitraire du commandement, mais cesse de se distribuer principalement entre coutumes, lignages, autorités ecclésiales, privilèges territoriaux et précédents féodaux. Elle tend à se condenser dans une instance de plus en plus unificatrice : la souveraineté monarchique, entendue non plus seulement comme dignité éminente ou primauté d’honneur, mais comme capacité de donner forme à l’ordre depuis un centre de décision supérieur. +Avec les monarchies renaissantes, l'arcalité subit un déplacement +décisif. Elle ne disparaît pas dans un pur arbitraire du commandement, +mais cesse de se distribuer principalement entre coutumes, lignages, +autorités ecclésiales, privilèges territoriaux et précédents féodaux. +Elle tend à se condenser dans une instance de plus en plus unificatrice +: la souveraineté monarchique, entendue non plus seulement comme dignité +éminente ou primauté d'honneur, mais comme capacité de donner forme à +l'ordre depuis un centre de décision supérieur. -Ce déplacement ne doit pas être caricaturé comme une simple substitution brutale du roi à tous les autres fondements. Les monarchies renaissantes continuent de composer avec des traditions, des droits acquis, des corps intermédiaires et des justifications religieuses puissantes. Mais le point essentiel est ailleurs : ces éléments cessent progressivement d’apparaître comme les sources ultimes de validité de l’ordre. Ils sont de plus en plus réinscrits dans une architecture où la couronne tend à se présenter comme l’instance qui les confirme, les hiérarchise, les arbitre ou les suspend. +Ce déplacement ne doit pas être caricaturé comme une simple substitution +brutale du roi à tous les autres fondements. Les monarchies renaissantes +continuent de composer avec des traditions, des droits acquis, des corps +intermédiaires et des justifications religieuses puissantes. Mais le +point essentiel est ailleurs : ces éléments cessent progressivement +d'apparaître comme les sources ultimes de validité de l'ordre. Ils sont +de plus en plus réinscrits dans une architecture où la couronne tend à +se présenter comme l'instance qui les confirme, les hiérarchise, les +arbitre ou les suspend. -C’est en ce sens que Bodin marque un seuil théorique majeur. Dans Les Six Livres de la République, la souveraineté n’est pas simplement décrite comme un fait de suprématie ; elle est pensée comme puissance absolue et perpétuelle, c’est-à-dire comme principe de non-dérivation du pouvoir politique suprême. L’importance du geste bodinien tient à ceci : il ne se contente pas de renforcer le roi ; il redéfinit le lieu du fondement. L’ordre politique n’a plus à être garanti en dernier ressort par la dispersion des fidélités, par la seule ancienneté coutumière ou par l’enchâssement des juridictions ; il trouve désormais son unité dans une puissance capable de dire la loi au-dessus des parties. +C'est en ce sens que Bodin marque un seuil théorique majeur. Dans Les +Six Livres de la République, la souveraineté n'est pas simplement +décrite comme un fait de suprématie ; elle est pensée comme puissance +absolue et perpétuelle, c'est-à-dire comme principe de non-dérivation du +pouvoir politique suprême. L'importance du geste bodinien tient à ceci : +il ne se contente pas de renforcer le roi ; il redéfinit le lieu du +fondement. L'ordre politique n'a plus à être garanti en dernier ressort +par la dispersion des fidélités, par la seule ancienneté coutumière ou +par l'enchâssement des juridictions ; il trouve désormais son unité dans +une puissance capable de dire la loi au-dessus des parties. -Une telle arcalité n’est pas encore pleinement désacralisée. Elle conserve des appuis théologiques, symboliques et cérémoniels décisifs ; elle continue de mobiliser la majesté, l’onction, la représentation du corps royal et tout un appareil de visibilité hiérarchique. Mais son originalité renaissante tient précisément à la combinaison de cette sacralité résiduelle avec une logique croissante d’unification juridique et politique. Le roi ne vaut plus seulement comme image terrestre d’un ordre supérieur ; il tend à devenir l’instance à partir de laquelle l’ordre reçoit sa cohérence proprement politique. +Une telle arcalité n'est pas encore pleinement désacralisée. Elle +conserve des appuis théologiques, symboliques et cérémoniels décisifs ; +elle continue de mobiliser la majesté, l'onction, la représentation du +corps royal et tout un appareil de visibilité hiérarchique. Mais son +originalité renaissante tient précisément à la combinaison de cette +sacralité résiduelle avec une logique croissante d'unification juridique +et politique. Le roi ne vaut plus seulement comme image terrestre d'un +ordre supérieur ; il tend à devenir l'instance à partir de laquelle +l'ordre reçoit sa cohérence proprement politique. -C’est pourquoi l’arcalité monarchique renaissante doit être dite à la fois incarnée et productive. Incarnée, parce qu’elle se concentre dans une personne, dans un corps, dans une majesté rendue visible par les rites, les emblèmes, les entrées, les liturgies de cour et les dispositifs de représentation. Productive, parce que cette incarnation ne se borne plus à protéger ou à refléter un ordre reçu : elle tend à devenir le point générateur d’une normativité nouvelle, susceptible de recomposer les hiérarchies, d’intégrer les médiations anciennes et de donner à l’ensemble politique une unité plus abstraite qu’auparavant. +C'est pourquoi l'arcalité monarchique renaissante doit être dite à la +fois incarnée et productive. Incarnée, parce qu'elle se concentre dans +une personne, dans un corps, dans une majesté rendue visible par les +rites, les emblèmes, les entrées, les liturgies de cour et les +dispositifs de représentation. Productive, parce que cette incarnation +ne se borne plus à protéger ou à refléter un ordre reçu : elle tend à +devenir le point générateur d'une normativité nouvelle, susceptible de +recomposer les hiérarchies, d'intégrer les médiations anciennes et de +donner à l'ensemble politique une unité plus abstraite qu'auparavant. -En ce sens, la monarchie renaissante n’invente pas seulement une figure plus forte du pouvoir ; elle transforme le statut du fondement lui-même. Là où le monde médiéval faisait largement tenir l’ordre par l’épaisseur des liens, des appartenances et des autorités emboîtées, le moment monarchique tend à poser qu’il faut, au sommet, une instance capable de ramener cette pluralité à une source de validité supérieure. L’arcalité se recentre donc moins sur la personne privée du roi que sur la fonction souveraine comme lieu d’unification de l’ordre. +En ce sens, la monarchie renaissante n'invente pas seulement une figure +plus forte du pouvoir ; elle transforme le statut du fondement lui-même. +Là où le monde médiéval faisait largement tenir l'ordre par l'épaisseur +des liens, des appartenances et des autorités emboîtées, le moment +monarchique tend à poser qu'il faut, au sommet, une instance capable de +ramener cette pluralité à une source de validité supérieure. L'arcalité +se recentre donc moins sur la personne privée du roi que sur la fonction +souveraine comme lieu d'unification de l'ordre. -Avec le moment monarchique renaissant, la cratialité cesse progressivement d’être dominée par la dispersion féodale des puissances, par la simple superposition des dépendances personnelles ou par l’équilibre toujours précaire entre juridictions concurrentes. Elle tend à se concentrer dans des chaînes de commandement plus continues, dans des relais administratifs plus stables et dans des dispositifs d’intervention qui donnent au centre souverain une prise plus constante sur le territoire, sur les populations et sur les conduites. +Avec le moment monarchique renaissant, la cratialité cesse +progressivement d'être dominée par la dispersion féodale des puissances, +par la simple superposition des dépendances personnelles ou par +l'équilibre toujours précaire entre juridictions concurrentes. Elle tend +à se concentrer dans des chaînes de commandement plus continues, dans +des relais administratifs plus stables et dans des dispositifs +d'intervention qui donnent au centre souverain une prise plus constante +sur le territoire, sur les populations et sur les conduites. -Ce déplacement ne signifie pas que toute puissance devienne soudain homogène ou parfaitement unifiée. Les monarchies renaissantes demeurent travaillées par les privilèges, les résistances locales, les corps intermédiaires, les autonomies urbaines et les héritages seigneuriaux. Mais la dynamique est nette : le pouvoir cherche de plus en plus à se rendre moins occasionnel, moins purement cérémoniel, moins dépendant des seules fidélités interpersonnelles. Il tend à devenir continu, relayé, cumulatif. +Ce déplacement ne signifie pas que toute puissance devienne soudain +homogène ou parfaitement unifiée. Les monarchies renaissantes demeurent +travaillées par les privilèges, les résistances locales, les corps +intermédiaires, les autonomies urbaines et les héritages seigneuriaux. +Mais la dynamique est nette : le pouvoir cherche de plus en plus à se +rendre moins occasionnel, moins purement cérémoniel, moins dépendant des +seules fidélités interpersonnelles. Il tend à devenir continu, relayé, +cumulatif. -Machiavel formule avec une acuité singulière l’une des dimensions décisives de cette mutation. Avec lui, la puissance cesse d’être pensée d’abord sous l’horizon du juste ou du licite ; elle est rapportée à la question de sa conservation, de son efficacité et de sa capacité à gouverner l’instabilité. Le Prince ne vaut pas parce qu’il incarnerait un bien supérieur, mais parce qu’il sait faire face à la contingence, manier la crainte, distribuer les signes de fermeté et produire des effets durables d’obéissance. La cratialité est ici stratégique : elle repose sur l’art de rendre le pouvoir opérant dans un monde mouvant, conflictuel et exposé à la fortune. +Machiavel formule avec une acuité singulière l'une des dimensions +décisives de cette mutation. Avec lui, la puissance cesse d'être pensée +d'abord sous l'horizon du juste ou du licite ; elle est rapportée à la +question de sa conservation, de son efficacité et de sa capacité à +gouverner l'instabilité. Le Prince ne vaut pas parce qu'il incarnerait +un bien supérieur, mais parce qu'il sait faire face à la contingence, +manier la crainte, distribuer les signes de fermeté et produire des +effets durables d'obéissance. La cratialité est ici stratégique : elle +repose sur l'art de rendre le pouvoir opérant dans un monde mouvant, +conflictuel et exposé à la fortune. -Hobbes radicalise le problème sur un autre plan. Là où Machiavel pense surtout les conditions de maintien du pouvoir, Hobbes reformule la nécessité même d’une puissance supérieure à partir de la peur de la dissolution violente. La cratialité n’est plus seulement la capacité du prince à durer ; elle devient condition anthropologico-politique d’un ordre possible. Le souverain n’est pas là pour parfaire moralement la communauté, mais pour empêcher que la conflictualité humaine ne retourne à la guerre diffuse. La puissance prend dès lors une signification plus abstraite, plus systématique : elle doit être suffisamment concentrée pour rendre l’ordre plus redoutable que le chaos. +Hobbes radicalise le problème sur un autre plan. Là où Machiavel pense +surtout les conditions de maintien du pouvoir, Hobbes reformule la +nécessité même d'une puissance supérieure à partir de la peur de la +dissolution violente. La cratialité n'est plus seulement la capacité du +prince à durer ; elle devient condition anthropologico-politique d'un +ordre possible. Le souverain n'est pas là pour parfaire moralement la +communauté, mais pour empêcher que la conflictualité humaine ne retourne +à la guerre diffuse. La puissance prend dès lors une signification plus +abstraite, plus systématique : elle doit être suffisamment concentrée +pour rendre l'ordre plus redoutable que le chaos. -Mais cette mutation doctrinale ne prend réellement corps qu’à travers des dispositifs matériels et administratifs. C’est là que la cratialité monarchique acquiert sa portée historique propre. Armées permanentes, fiscalités plus régulières, intendances, réseaux d’officiers, circulation des ordres, enregistrement des décisions, contrôle des marchés, surveillance urbaine, police naissante : autant d’instruments par lesquels le pouvoir cesse d’être seulement sommet symbolique pour devenir capacité d’action relayée. +Mais cette mutation doctrinale ne prend réellement corps qu'à travers +des dispositifs matériels et administratifs. C'est là que la cratialité +monarchique acquiert sa portée historique propre. Armées permanentes, +fiscalités plus régulières, intendances, réseaux d'officiers, +circulation des ordres, enregistrement des décisions, contrôle des +marchés, surveillance urbaine, police naissante : autant d'instruments +par lesquels le pouvoir cesse d'être seulement sommet symbolique pour +devenir capacité d'action relayée. -Il faut être précis ici. La police des monarchies classiques n’est pas encore la police au sens contemporain restreint ; elle désigne bien plus largement un ensemble de techniques d’administration de la cité, de surveillance des désordres, de gestion des circulations, de classement des populations et d’encadrement des comportements. Ce que l’on voit émerger, c’est une cratialité qui ne se contente plus de punir ou de trancher après coup, mais qui cherche à prévenir, à répartir, à ordonner en amont. Le pouvoir devient moins spectaculaire, mais plus constant dans sa présence. +Il faut être précis ici. La police des monarchies classiques n'est pas +encore la police au sens contemporain restreint ; elle désigne bien plus +largement un ensemble de techniques d'administration de la cité, de +surveillance des désordres, de gestion des circulations, de classement +des populations et d'encadrement des comportements. Ce que l'on voit +émerger, c'est une cratialité qui ne se contente plus de punir ou de +trancher après coup, mais qui cherche à prévenir, à répartir, à ordonner +en amont. Le pouvoir devient moins spectaculaire, mais plus constant +dans sa présence. -Cette évolution donne à la puissance monarchique une forme nouvelle. Elle reste verticale dans son principe, puisqu’elle se réclame d’un centre souverain ; mais elle devient réticulaire dans ses vecteurs, parce qu’elle ne peut plus agir sans relais, sans bureaux, sans écritures, sans agents, sans procédures. La force ne disparaît pas ; elle change d’économie. Elle n’est plus seulement démonstration de majesté ou irruption punitive : elle devient aussi suivi des conduites, administration des hommes, capacité de faire circuler l’ordre dans les mailles du royaume. +Cette évolution donne à la puissance monarchique une forme nouvelle. +Elle reste verticale dans son principe, puisqu'elle se réclame d'un +centre souverain ; mais elle devient réticulaire dans ses vecteurs, +parce qu'elle ne peut plus agir sans relais, sans bureaux, sans +écritures, sans agents, sans procédures. La force ne disparaît pas ; +elle change d'économie. Elle n'est plus seulement démonstration de +majesté ou irruption punitive : elle devient aussi suivi des conduites, +administration des hommes, capacité de faire circuler l'ordre dans les +mailles du royaume. -C’est pourquoi la cratialité monarchique renaissante doit être dite à la fois centralisatrice et distributive. Centralisatrice, parce qu’elle cherche à rapporter la puissance à un principe supérieur d’unification. Distributive, parce qu’elle ne devient réellement efficace qu’en se relayant à travers une multitude d’agents, de fonctions et de procédures. Elle prépare ainsi un seuil décisif de l’histoire de la régulation : celui d’un pouvoir qui ne règne pleinement qu’en devenant administration. +C'est pourquoi la cratialité monarchique renaissante doit être dite à la +fois centralisatrice et distributive. Centralisatrice, parce qu'elle +cherche à rapporter la puissance à un principe supérieur d'unification. +Distributive, parce qu'elle ne devient réellement efficace qu'en se +relayant à travers une multitude d'agents, de fonctions et de +procédures. Elle prépare ainsi un seuil décisif de l'histoire de la +régulation : celui d'un pouvoir qui ne règne pleinement qu'en devenant +administration. -Le moment monarchique renaissant transforme enfin en profondeur la scène même de l’archicration. La règle n’y vaut plus principalement par l’ancienneté de l’usage, par la seule autorité de la coutume ou par l’épaisseur d’une médiation religieuse ; elle tend de plus en plus à s’imposer comme norme formulée, publiée, stabilisée et rendue opposable dans des formes relativement homogènes. L’obligation ne disparaît pas dans l’arbitraire du commandement ; elle se fixe dans des procédures d’énonciation, de circulation et de consignation qui donnent à la régulation une lisibilité nouvelle. +Le moment monarchique renaissant transforme enfin en profondeur la scène +même de l'archicration. La règle n'y vaut plus principalement par +l'ancienneté de l'usage, par la seule autorité de la coutume ou par +l'épaisseur d'une médiation religieuse ; elle tend de plus en plus à +s'imposer comme norme formulée, publiée, stabilisée et rendue opposable +dans des formes relativement homogènes. L'obligation ne disparaît pas +dans l'arbitraire du commandement ; elle se fixe dans des procédures +d'énonciation, de circulation et de consignation qui donnent à la +régulation une lisibilité nouvelle. -L’imprimerie joue ici un rôle décisif, non comme cause unique, mais comme opérateur de transformation. Elle ne crée pas à elle seule la normativité monarchique ; elle en modifie toutefois profondément la portée en permettant une diffusion plus régulière, une stabilisation relative des textes et une meilleure reproductibilité des actes. Édits, ordonnances, déclarations, recueils, commentaires et compilations peuvent désormais circuler sous des formes moins instables, ce qui accroît la capacité du pouvoir à rendre la règle plus présente, plus reconnaissable et plus durable à l’échelle du royaume. +L'imprimerie joue ici un rôle décisif, non comme cause unique, mais +comme opérateur de transformation. Elle ne crée pas à elle seule la +normativité monarchique ; elle en modifie toutefois profondément la +portée en permettant une diffusion plus régulière, une stabilisation +relative des textes et une meilleure reproductibilité des actes. Édits, +ordonnances, déclarations, recueils, commentaires et compilations +peuvent désormais circuler sous des formes moins instables, ce qui +accroît la capacité du pouvoir à rendre la règle plus présente, plus +reconnaissable et plus durable à l'échelle du royaume. -Ce point doit être tenu avec précision. L’écrit existait bien avant l’imprimé, et la normativité médiévale connaissait déjà des formes savantes de consignation, de compilation et de commentaire. Ce qui change ici, c’est moins l’existence de la textualité que son régime d’effectuation. La norme tend à devenir plus uniformément identifiable, plus aisément transmissible et plus susceptible d’être invoquée comme telle. Elle gagne en fixité apparente, en continuité matérielle et en possibilité de contrôle. +Ce point doit être tenu avec précision. L'écrit existait bien avant +l'imprimé, et la normativité médiévale connaissait déjà des formes +savantes de consignation, de compilation et de commentaire. Ce qui +change ici, c'est moins l'existence de la textualité que son régime +d'effectuation. La norme tend à devenir plus uniformément identifiable, +plus aisément transmissible et plus susceptible d'être invoquée comme +telle. Elle gagne en fixité apparente, en continuité matérielle et en +possibilité de contrôle. -L’archicration monarchique se rationalise ainsi par la convergence de plusieurs opérations. D’une part, la règle est davantage formulée dans une langue d’autorité qui cherche l’unité, la généralité et la continuité. D’autre part, elle est relayée par des pratiques d’enregistrement, d’archivage, de publication et de vérification qui en soutiennent l’effectivité. Enfin, elle est de plus en plus pensée comme expression d’une compétence souveraine à ordonner le monde politique, et non comme simple rappel d’un ordre antérieur. +L'archicration monarchique se rationalise ainsi par la convergence de +plusieurs opérations. D'une part, la règle est davantage formulée dans +une langue d'autorité qui cherche l'unité, la généralité et la +continuité. D'autre part, elle est relayée par des pratiques +d'enregistrement, d'archivage, de publication et de vérification qui en +soutiennent l'effectivité. Enfin, elle est de plus en plus pensée comme +expression d'une compétence souveraine à ordonner le monde politique, et +non comme simple rappel d'un ordre antérieur. -C’est en ce sens qu’il faut parler ici de positivation croissante de la règle. La loi tend à valoir moins par son inscription dans une tradition sacrée ou coutumière que par son énonciation autorisée dans un cadre souverain. Il ne s’agit pas encore d’un positivisme juridique au sens strict ni d’un système formel pleinement clos ; mais le mouvement est décisif. La norme devient davantage liée à la procédure qui la produit, à la forme qui la stabilise et à l’appareil qui la fait exister socialement. +C'est en ce sens qu'il faut parler ici de positivation croissante de la +règle. La loi tend à valoir moins par son inscription dans une tradition +sacrée ou coutumière que par son énonciation autorisée dans un cadre +souverain. Il ne s'agit pas encore d'un positivisme juridique au sens +strict ni d'un système formel pleinement clos ; mais le mouvement est +décisif. La norme devient davantage liée à la procédure qui la produit, +à la forme qui la stabilise et à l'appareil qui la fait exister +socialement. -Hobbes, sur ce point, formule un seuil doctrinal d’une grande puissance. La loi n’y apparaît plus comme simple traduction d’une justice substantielle antérieure ; elle procède de l’autorité de celui qui a charge de maintenir l’ordre commun. L’intérêt d’un tel geste, pour notre analyse, n’est pas d’annoncer mécaniquement toutes les théories juridiques ultérieures, mais de rendre pensable une archicration dans laquelle la validité de la règle se détache progressivement de ses anciennes garanties théologiques ou coutumières pour se rapporter de plus en plus à la structure de son institution. +Hobbes, sur ce point, formule un seuil doctrinal d'une grande puissance. +La loi n'y apparaît plus comme simple traduction d'une justice +substantielle antérieure ; elle procède de l'autorité de celui qui a +charge de maintenir l'ordre commun. L'intérêt d'un tel geste, pour notre +analyse, n'est pas d'annoncer mécaniquement toutes les théories +juridiques ultérieures, mais de rendre pensable une archicration dans +laquelle la validité de la règle se détache progressivement de ses +anciennes garanties théologiques ou coutumières pour se rapporter de +plus en plus à la structure de son institution. -Il en résulte une transformation profonde du rapport entre pouvoir et normativité. La règle ne se contente plus de surplomber l’action ; elle entre dans les pratiques de gouvernement elles-mêmes. Elle organise les statuts, classe les situations, homogénéise certaines procédures, rend possibles des comparaisons et des rappels d’une manière auparavant plus difficile. La co-viabilité se trouve alors prise dans un monde où la norme n’est pas seulement énoncée ; elle est matérialisée, relayée, reprise et inscrite dans une chaîne de médiations qui la rendent plus constante. +Il en résulte une transformation profonde du rapport entre pouvoir et +normativité. La règle ne se contente plus de surplomber l'action ; elle +entre dans les pratiques de gouvernement elles-mêmes. Elle organise les +statuts, classe les situations, homogénéise certaines procédures, rend +possibles des comparaisons et des rappels d'une manière auparavant plus +difficile. La co-viabilité se trouve alors prise dans un monde où la +norme n'est pas seulement énoncée ; elle est matérialisée, relayée, +reprise et inscrite dans une chaîne de médiations qui la rendent plus +constante. -C’est cette convergence entre formalisation de la règle, capacité de publication et prise administrative sur les situations qui donne à l’archicration monarchique renaissante sa forme propre. Elle n’est plus principalement liturgique comme dans la chrétienté médiévale, ni principalement coutumière comme dans les mondes féodo-seigneuriaux ; elle tend à devenir textuellement stabilisée, procéduralement soutenue et politiquement rapportée à un centre souverain d’énonciation. +C'est cette convergence entre formalisation de la règle, capacité de +publication et prise administrative sur les situations qui donne à +l'archicration monarchique renaissante sa forme propre. Elle n'est plus +principalement liturgique comme dans la chrétienté médiévale, ni +principalement coutumière comme dans les mondes féodo-seigneuriaux ; +elle tend à devenir textuellement stabilisée, procéduralement soutenue +et politiquement rapportée à un centre souverain d'énonciation. -Le régime monarchique renaissant ne s’arrête pas à son moment d’émergence doctrinale. Il se prolonge, se densifie et se transforme dans les absolutismes classiques, où la centralisation souveraine, déjà amorcée, cherche à se donner une stabilité supérieure. Ce second moment n’invente pas un autre régime ; il pousse plus loin la logique déjà engagée : celle d’un ordre de plus en plus rapporté à un centre d’énonciation unique, relayé par des appareils de commandement, d’enregistrement et d’exécution plus serrés. +Le régime monarchique renaissant ne s'arrête pas à son moment +d'émergence doctrinale. Il se prolonge, se densifie et se transforme +dans les absolutismes classiques, où la centralisation souveraine, déjà +amorcée, cherche à se donner une stabilité supérieure. Ce second moment +n'invente pas un autre régime ; il pousse plus loin la logique déjà +engagée : celle d'un ordre de plus en plus rapporté à un centre +d'énonciation unique, relayé par des appareils de commandement, +d'enregistrement et d'exécution plus serrés. -Dans cette phase, la figure royale tend à concentrer en elle bien davantage qu’une fonction d’arbitrage suprême. Elle devient le foyer à partir duquel la cohérence de l’ensemble doit se rendre visible, légitime et praticable. La majesté monarchique ne vaut plus seulement comme signe de prééminence ; elle soutient une prétention plus lourde : faire tenir l’unité politique en réduisant l’autonomie relative des médiations anciennes, en hiérarchisant les corps et en intégrant plus fermement les circuits de pouvoir à la couronne. +Dans cette phase, la figure royale tend à concentrer en elle bien +davantage qu'une fonction d'arbitrage suprême. Elle devient le foyer à +partir duquel la cohérence de l'ensemble doit se rendre visible, +légitime et praticable. La majesté monarchique ne vaut plus seulement +comme signe de prééminence ; elle soutient une prétention plus lourde : +faire tenir l'unité politique en réduisant l'autonomie relative des +médiations anciennes, en hiérarchisant les corps et en intégrant plus +fermement les circuits de pouvoir à la couronne. -La cratialité s’épaissit alors à travers des dispositifs plus suivis d’administration, de prélèvement, de surveillance et de gouvernement. Ce qui, à la Renaissance, apparaissait encore comme tendance ou comme expérimentation devient plus systématique : développement des offices, renforcement des intendances, stabilisation fiscale, armées plus permanentes, police plus régulière, contrôle plus attentif des flux, des populations et des conduites. L’ordre monarchique gagne en continuité, mais cette continuité a un prix : elle exige davantage d’écritures, davantage de relais, davantage de procédures, et donc une extension croissante des points de friction entre le centre et le corps social. +La cratialité s'épaissit alors à travers des dispositifs plus suivis +d'administration, de prélèvement, de surveillance et de gouvernement. Ce +qui, à la Renaissance, apparaissait encore comme tendance ou comme +expérimentation devient plus systématique : développement des offices, +renforcement des intendances, stabilisation fiscale, armées plus +permanentes, police plus régulière, contrôle plus attentif des flux, des +populations et des conduites. L'ordre monarchique gagne en continuité, +mais cette continuité a un prix : elle exige davantage d'écritures, +davantage de relais, davantage de procédures, et donc une extension +croissante des points de friction entre le centre et le corps social. -L’archicration elle-même se resserre. Elle ne disparaît pas, mais elle tend à être captée par des formes de validation plus étroitement contrôlées. Les marges de reprise de la règle subsistent — remontrances, résistances locales, négociations fiscales, conflits de juridiction, révoltes — mais elles sont de plus en plus réinscrites dans un dispositif qui cherche moins à reconnaître le dissensus comme moment constitutif qu’à le requalifier comme perturbation à absorber. L’ordre monarchique absolu ne se contente pas de produire la norme ; il tend à monopoliser les conditions mêmes de sa reformulation. +L'archicration elle-même se resserre. Elle ne disparaît pas, mais elle +tend à être captée par des formes de validation plus étroitement +contrôlées. Les marges de reprise de la règle subsistent — remontrances, résistances locales, négociations fiscales, conflits de +juridiction, révoltes — mais elles sont de plus en plus réinscrites +dans un dispositif qui cherche moins à reconnaître le dissensus comme +moment constitutif qu'à le requalifier comme perturbation à absorber. +L'ordre monarchique absolu ne se contente pas de produire la norme ; il +tend à monopoliser les conditions mêmes de sa reformulation. -C’est ici que se loge sa force, mais aussi sa fragilité. En centralisant fortement l’arcalité, en densifiant la cratialité et en resserrant l’archicration, le régime monarchique gagne en puissance d’unification ; mais il risque aussi d’appauvrir les médiations qui rendaient l’ordre social plus respirable, plus négociable et plus relayé par des scènes secondaires de régulation. À mesure qu’il prétend ramener l’ensemble à une cohérence plus ferme, il rend plus visibles les coûts de cette cohérence : surcharge normative, saturation administrative, rigidification des hiérarchies, extension des résistances passives ou ouvertes. +C'est ici que se loge sa force, mais aussi sa fragilité. En centralisant +fortement l'arcalité, en densifiant la cratialité et en resserrant +l'archicration, le régime monarchique gagne en puissance d'unification ; +mais il risque aussi d'appauvrir les médiations qui rendaient l'ordre +social plus respirable, plus négociable et plus relayé par des scènes +secondaires de régulation. À mesure qu'il prétend ramener l'ensemble à +une cohérence plus ferme, il rend plus visibles les coûts de cette +cohérence : surcharge normative, saturation administrative, +rigidification des hiérarchies, extension des résistances passives ou +ouvertes. -La critique moderne de l’absolutisme naît dans cet espace de tension. Elle ne surgit pas d’un refus simple de toute régulation, mais d’une contestation de sa monopolisation. Ce qui devient de moins en moins supportable, ce n’est pas l’existence de la norme en tant que telle ; c’est sa captation par une source unique, son opacité croissante, l’asymétrie entre l’unification des obligations et la faiblesse des scènes légitimes de reprise. Les pensées des Lumières, les théories de la séparation des pouvoirs, les doctrines de la souveraineté nationale ou populaire se déploieront sur ce fond : non pour abolir l’exigence d’ordre, mais pour en déplacer le centre de gravité et en redistribuer les conditions de légitimité. +La critique moderne de l'absolutisme naît dans cet espace de tension. +Elle ne surgit pas d'un refus simple de toute régulation, mais d'une +contestation de sa monopolisation. Ce qui devient de moins en moins +supportable, ce n'est pas l'existence de la norme en tant que telle ; +c'est sa captation par une source unique, son opacité croissante, +l'asymétrie entre l'unification des obligations et la faiblesse des +scènes légitimes de reprise. Les pensées des Lumières, les théories de +la séparation des pouvoirs, les doctrines de la souveraineté nationale +ou populaire se déploieront sur ce fond : non pour abolir l'exigence +d'ordre, mais pour en déplacer le centre de gravité et en redistribuer +les conditions de légitimité. -En ce sens, les monarchies renaissantes et absolutistes occupent une place décisive dans notre généalogie. Elles ne sont pas seulement un moment de transition entre féodalité et modernité politique ; elles constituent un seuil archicratique propre, où l’ordre devient plus explicitement produit, plus massivement relayé, plus techniquement soutenu et plus étroitement rapporté à une souveraineté de centralisation. Elles montrent jusqu’à quel point une société peut chercher à faire tenir ensemble fondement, puissance et régulation dans l’unité d’un même centre — et à partir de quel point cette réussite même prépare une crise de ses propres conditions de recevabilité. +En ce sens, les monarchies renaissantes et absolutistes occupent une +place décisive dans notre généalogie. Elles ne sont pas seulement un +moment de transition entre féodalité et modernité politique ; elles +constituent un seuil archicratique propre, où l'ordre devient plus +explicitement produit, plus massivement relayé, plus techniquement +soutenu et plus étroitement rapporté à une souveraineté de +centralisation. Elles montrent jusqu'à quel point une société peut +chercher à faire tenir ensemble fondement, puissance et régulation dans +l'unité d'un même centre — et à partir de quel point cette réussite +même prépare une crise de ses propres conditions de recevabilité. -La sous-section suivante s’ouvrira précisément sur cette crise transformatrice. Car les régimes modernes ne naîtront pas contre toute archicration, mais à partir d’une redistribution de ses lieux, de ses justifications et de ses procédures. Ce qui se déplace alors, ce n’est pas la nécessité de réguler, mais la scène à partir de laquelle la règle peut prétendre valoir : non plus principalement le corps du roi, mais des formes nouvelles de publicité, de représentation, d’administration et de légitimation politique. +La sous-section suivante s'ouvrira précisément sur cette crise +transformatrice. Car les régimes modernes ne naîtront pas contre toute +archicration, mais à partir d'une redistribution de ses lieux, de ses +justifications et de ses procédures. Ce qui se déplace alors, ce n'est +pas la nécessité de réguler, mais la scène à partir de laquelle la règle +peut prétendre valoir : non plus principalement le corps du roi, mais +des formes nouvelles de publicité, de représentation, d'administration +et de légitimation politique. ### 2.3.4 — Régimes disciplinaires et industriels (XIXe siècle) : codification, institutionnalisation, extériorisation -Le XIXe siècle marque une inflexion majeure dans l’histoire des régimes de co-viabilité. L’ordre n’y repose plus principalement sur la centralité visible d’une souveraineté incarnée, ni sur la seule autorité de la loi proclamée, ni sur l’épaisseur coutumière de médiations héritées. Il tend de plus en plus à se soutenir par des institutions, des dispositifs d’encadrement, des procédures répétitives et des environnements réglés qui organisent les conduites en amont même de leur formulation explicite. Ce qui se transforme alors n’est pas seulement l’intensité de la régulation, mais sa texture : la norme cesse d’apparaître d’abord comme commandement pour se déployer comme milieu. +Le XIXe siècle marque une inflexion majeure dans l'histoire des régimes +de co-viabilité. L'ordre n'y repose plus principalement sur la +centralité visible d'une souveraineté incarnée, ni sur la seule autorité +de la loi proclamée, ni sur l'épaisseur coutumière de médiations +héritées. Il tend de plus en plus à se soutenir par des institutions, +des dispositifs d'encadrement, des procédures répétitives et des +environnements réglés qui organisent les conduites en amont même de leur +formulation explicite. Ce qui se transforme alors n'est pas seulement +l'intensité de la régulation, mais sa texture : la norme cesse +d'apparaître d'abord comme commandement pour se déployer comme milieu. -Cette mutation ne doit pas être simplifiée en une substitution pure et simple de l’institution à la souveraineté. Le XIXe siècle ne fait pas disparaître l’État, la loi ou le commandement ; il les relaie et les prolonge à travers des formes d’encadrement plus fines, plus continues et plus incorporées. École, caserne, hôpital, prison, atelier, administration, empire colonial : autant de scènes où l’ordre se reproduit désormais par distribution des places, surveillance des trajectoires, séquençage des temps, normalisation des gestes, classement des aptitudes et correction des écarts. +Cette mutation ne doit pas être simplifiée en une substitution pure et +simple de l'institution à la souveraineté. Le XIXe siècle ne fait pas +disparaître l'État, la loi ou le commandement ; il les relaie et les +prolonge à travers des formes d'encadrement plus fines, plus continues +et plus incorporées. École, caserne, hôpital, prison, atelier, +administration, empire colonial : autant de scènes où l'ordre se +reproduit désormais par distribution des places, surveillance des +trajectoires, séquençage des temps, normalisation des gestes, classement +des aptitudes et correction des écarts. -En ce sens, le XIXe siècle ne constitue pas seulement un âge disciplinaire au sens descriptif. Il ouvre un moment où l’archicration devient de plus en plus objectivée. L’arcalité se dépose dans des architectures, des rythmes, des procédures et des cadres matériels de conduite ; la cratialité se distribue dans des chaînes d’agents, d’experts, de surveillants, de contremaîtres, d’inspecteurs ou de gestionnaires ; l’archicration s’exerce dans les opérations mêmes par lesquelles les comportements sont observés, comparés, mesurés, corrigés et rendus conformes. +En ce sens, le XIXe siècle ne constitue pas seulement un âge +disciplinaire au sens descriptif. Il ouvre un moment où l'archicration +devient de plus en plus objectivée. L'arcalité se dépose dans des +architectures, des rythmes, des procédures et des cadres matériels de +conduite ; la cratialité se distribue dans des chaînes d'agents, +d'experts, de surveillants, de contremaîtres, d'inspecteurs ou de +gestionnaires ; l'archicration s'exerce dans les opérations mêmes par +lesquelles les comportements sont observés, comparés, mesurés, corrigés +et rendus conformes. -Il faut toutefois tenir ensemble plusieurs dimensions de ce moment. D’un côté, les régimes disciplinaires et industriels approfondissent la technicisation de la régulation dans les sociétés européennes et nord-atlantiques. De l’autre, ils s’étendent à l’échelle impériale, où cette normativité se projette sous des formes dissymétriques et hiérarchisées. Enfin, ils rencontrent aussi des contre-formes de co-viabilité — ouvrières, communautaires, autochtones — qui ne relèvent ni d’une simple survivance archaïque ni d’une réaction marginale, mais d’autres manières de tenir ensemble la vie collective. +Il faut toutefois tenir ensemble plusieurs dimensions de ce moment. D'un +côté, les régimes disciplinaires et industriels approfondissent la +technicisation de la régulation dans les sociétés européennes et +nord-atlantiques. De l'autre, ils s'étendent à l'échelle impériale, où +cette normativité se projette sous des formes dissymétriques et +hiérarchisées. Enfin, ils rencontrent aussi des contre-formes de +co-viabilité — ouvrières, communautaires, autochtones — qui ne +relèvent ni d'une simple survivance archaïque ni d'une réaction +marginale, mais d'autres manières de tenir ensemble la vie collective. -La présente sous-section examinera donc le XIXe siècle non comme un bloc uniforme, mais comme un champ d’intensification archicratique où se combinent trois mouvements : institutionnalisation disciplinaire des conduites, objectivation industrielle de la norme et extension coloniale de dispositifs régulateurs profondément asymétriques. C’est à partir de cette triple dynamique que devient lisible la spécificité du moment : une co-viabilité de plus en plus produite par l’agencement des cadres, des rythmes, des fonctions et des classifications. +La présente sous-section examinera donc le XIXe siècle non comme un bloc +uniforme, mais comme un champ d'intensification archicratique où se +combinent trois mouvements : institutionnalisation disciplinaire des +conduites, objectivation industrielle de la norme et extension coloniale +de dispositifs régulateurs profondément asymétriques. C'est à partir de +cette triple dynamique que devient lisible la spécificité du moment : +une co-viabilité de plus en plus produite par l'agencement des cadres, +des rythmes, des fonctions et des classifications. -Au XIXe siècle, le cœur disciplinaire de l’ordre se déploie dans une série d’institutions qui ont pour trait commun de faire tenir les conduites moins par proclamation que par leur organisation concrète. L’école, la caserne, l’hôpital et la prison ne doivent pas être appréhendés comme de simples lieux spécialisés ; ils constituent des matrices où s’expérimente une même logique de co-viabilité par encadrement continu, répartition des corps, séquençage des temps et correction des écarts. +Au XIXe siècle, le cœur disciplinaire de l'ordre se déploie dans une +série d'institutions qui ont pour trait commun de faire tenir les +conduites moins par proclamation que par leur organisation concrète. +L'école, la caserne, l'hôpital et la prison ne doivent pas être +appréhendés comme de simples lieux spécialisés ; ils constituent des +matrices où s'expérimente une même logique de co-viabilité par +encadrement continu, répartition des corps, séquençage des temps et +correction des écarts. -Ce qui les rapproche n’est pas leur finalité, mais la forme de leur opérativité. Chacune institue un espace fermé ou semi-fermé, un rythme réglé, une distribution précise des positions, une hiérarchie de surveillance, un appareillage d’écriture ou de notation, et une capacité de sanction ou de réajustement. L’ordre n’y procède plus principalement d’une adhésion explicite à un fondement supérieur ; il se soutient par la répétition de pratiques qui rendent certains comportements attendus, d’autres déviants, d’autres encore mesurables et perfectibles. +Ce qui les rapproche n'est pas leur finalité, mais la forme de leur +opérativité. Chacune institue un espace fermé ou semi-fermé, un rythme +réglé, une distribution précise des positions, une hiérarchie de +surveillance, un appareillage d'écriture ou de notation, et une capacité +de sanction ou de réajustement. L'ordre n'y procède plus principalement +d'une adhésion explicite à un fondement supérieur ; il se soutient par +la répétition de pratiques qui rendent certains comportements attendus, +d'autres déviants, d'autres encore mesurables et perfectibles. -L’école offre l’une des figures les plus lisibles de cette mutation. Ce qui y régule n’est pas seulement le contenu des savoirs transmis, mais la forme scolaire elle-même : salle ordonnée, temps découpé, alternance du silence et de la parole autorisée, exercices répétés, devoirs, classements, inspections, examens. L’arcalité s’y dépose dans un cadre spatial et scripturaire qui rend l’apprentissage inséparable d’une discipline du corps et de l’attention. La cratialité s’exerce à travers l’enseignant, l’inspecteur, le règlement et toute une économie de l’évaluation. Quant à l’archicration, elle réside dans les opérations par lesquelles l’élève est continuellement situé, comparé, repris et orienté selon une norme de progression. L’école n’instruit pas seulement : elle produit aussi de la recevabilité sociale. +L'école offre l'une des figures les plus lisibles de cette mutation. Ce +qui y régule n'est pas seulement le contenu des savoirs transmis, mais +la forme scolaire elle-même : salle ordonnée, temps découpé, alternance +du silence et de la parole autorisée, exercices répétés, devoirs, +classements, inspections, examens. L'arcalité s'y dépose dans un cadre +spatial et scripturaire qui rend l'apprentissage inséparable d'une +discipline du corps et de l'attention. La cratialité s'exerce à travers +l'enseignant, l'inspecteur, le règlement et toute une économie de +l'évaluation. Quant à l'archicration, elle réside dans les opérations +par lesquelles l'élève est continuellement situé, comparé, repris et +orienté selon une norme de progression. L'école n'instruit pas seulement +: elle produit aussi de la recevabilité sociale. -La caserne pousse cette logique jusqu’à une intensité particulière. Là, le corps doit devenir immédiatement disponible, coordonnable, alignable. L’apprentissage militaire ne consiste pas seulement à transmettre une compétence de combat ; il organise une disposition intégrale du geste, de la posture, du déplacement, de la réponse à l’ordre. La répétition, la cadence, le drill, la hiérarchie visible, la sanction rapide et la précision des commandements composent une scène où la conformité vaut d’abord comme synchronisation du corps avec une chaîne de puissance. L’arcalité y est inscrite dans l’uniformité réglée des places et des mouvements ; la cratialité se manifeste dans la verticalité des grades ; l’archicration opère dans les exercices mêmes, qui convertissent l’obéissance en réflexe et la coordination en seconde nature. +La caserne pousse cette logique jusqu'à une intensité particulière. Là, +le corps doit devenir immédiatement disponible, coordonnable, alignable. +L'apprentissage militaire ne consiste pas seulement à transmettre une +compétence de combat ; il organise une disposition intégrale du geste, +de la posture, du déplacement, de la réponse à l'ordre. La répétition, +la cadence, le drill, la hiérarchie visible, la sanction rapide et la +précision des commandements composent une scène où la conformité vaut +d'abord comme synchronisation du corps avec une chaîne de puissance. +L'arcalité y est inscrite dans l'uniformité réglée des places et des +mouvements ; la cratialité se manifeste dans la verticalité des grades ; +l'archicration opère dans les exercices mêmes, qui convertissent +l'obéissance en réflexe et la coordination en seconde nature. -L’hôpital moderne constitue une autre scène décisive de cette reconfiguration. Il ne s’agit plus seulement d’y recueillir ou d’y assister les malades, mais d’y organiser un espace d’observation, de classement, de traitement et de surveillance où le corps devient lisible à travers des catégories, des dossiers, des diagnostics et des protocoles. Ce qui s’y impose n’est pas d’abord une autorité spectaculaire du médecin, mais un régime de visibilité médicale qui distribue les positions, qualifie les symptômes et ordonne les interventions. L’arcalité se loge dans le dispositif clinique lui-même, dans la possibilité de faire apparaître le corps comme cas intelligible ; la cratialité se distribue entre médecins, internes, surveillants et administration hospitalière ; l’archicration se déploie dans la chaîne des observations, prescriptions, examens et révisions qui rendent le patient gouvernable comme sujet de soin et comme objet de normalisation. +L'hôpital moderne constitue une autre scène décisive de cette +reconfiguration. Il ne s'agit plus seulement d'y recueillir ou d'y +assister les malades, mais d'y organiser un espace d'observation, de +classement, de traitement et de surveillance où le corps devient lisible +à travers des catégories, des dossiers, des diagnostics et des +protocoles. Ce qui s'y impose n'est pas d'abord une autorité +spectaculaire du médecin, mais un régime de visibilité médicale qui +distribue les positions, qualifie les symptômes et ordonne les +interventions. L'arcalité se loge dans le dispositif clinique lui-même, +dans la possibilité de faire apparaître le corps comme cas intelligible +; la cratialité se distribue entre médecins, internes, surveillants et +administration hospitalière ; l'archicration se déploie dans la chaîne +des observations, prescriptions, examens et révisions qui rendent le +patient gouvernable comme sujet de soin et comme objet de normalisation. -La prison, enfin, fait apparaître avec une particulière netteté la logique disciplinaire du siècle. Le châtiment n’y vise plus principalement l’exposition publique de la peine ; il tend à devenir enfermement réglé, découpage des temps, isolement, travail imposé, surveillance continue, notation des conduites. L’ordre carcéral organise un monde où chaque déplacement, chaque parole, chaque manquement peut être observé, enregistré et interprété. L’arcalité est alors profondément spatialisée : plan de détention, séparation des corps, circulation contrôlée. La cratialité prend la forme d’une surveillance hiérarchisée et procédurale. L’archicration réside dans l’ensemble des opérations qui visent non seulement à contenir, mais aussi à reconfigurer le détenu selon une norme de conduite. +La prison, enfin, fait apparaître avec une particulière netteté la +logique disciplinaire du siècle. Le châtiment n'y vise plus +principalement l'exposition publique de la peine ; il tend à devenir +enfermement réglé, découpage des temps, isolement, travail imposé, +surveillance continue, notation des conduites. L'ordre carcéral organise +un monde où chaque déplacement, chaque parole, chaque manquement peut +être observé, enregistré et interprété. L'arcalité est alors +profondément spatialisée : plan de détention, séparation des corps, +circulation contrôlée. La cratialité prend la forme d'une surveillance +hiérarchisée et procédurale. L'archicration réside dans l'ensemble des +opérations qui visent non seulement à contenir, mais aussi à +reconfigurer le détenu selon une norme de conduite. -À travers ces quatre figures, un même seuil devient visible. La régulation ne s’exerce plus prioritairement sur des sujets abstraits de droit, ni sur des fidélités personnelles, ni sur des appartenances reçues ; elle prend appui sur des corps situés, sur des comportements répétables, sur des écarts mesurables, sur des trajectoires rectifiables. Le pouvoir disciplinaire ne parle pas moins que les régimes antérieurs, mais il agit surtout en configurant des scènes dans lesquelles les conduites deviennent comparables, corrigibles et intégrables dans un ordre plus vaste. +À travers ces quatre figures, un même seuil devient visible. La +régulation ne s'exerce plus prioritairement sur des sujets abstraits de +droit, ni sur des fidélités personnelles, ni sur des appartenances +reçues ; elle prend appui sur des corps situés, sur des comportements +répétables, sur des écarts mesurables, sur des trajectoires +rectifiables. Le pouvoir disciplinaire ne parle pas moins que les +régimes antérieurs, mais il agit surtout en configurant des scènes dans +lesquelles les conduites deviennent comparables, corrigibles et +intégrables dans un ordre plus vaste. -Il faut toutefois éviter toute simplification. Ces institutions ne se réduisent pas à une essence unique, et leurs finalités demeurent distinctes : instruire, soigner, punir, former au combat. Mais ce qui les relie dans notre analyse est décisif : elles rendent manifeste une archicration où la norme cesse de se présenter d’abord comme principe déclaré pour se déposer dans l’agencement même des situations. Le XIXe siècle disciplinaire fait ainsi apparaître une régulation où le milieu institutionnel devient lui-même opérateur de co-viabilité. +Il faut toutefois éviter toute simplification. Ces institutions ne se +réduisent pas à une essence unique, et leurs finalités demeurent +distinctes : instruire, soigner, punir, former au combat. Mais ce qui +les relie dans notre analyse est décisif : elles rendent manifeste une +archicration où la norme cesse de se présenter d'abord comme principe +déclaré pour se déposer dans l'agencement même des situations. Le XIXe +siècle disciplinaire fait ainsi apparaître une régulation où le milieu +institutionnel devient lui-même opérateur de co-viabilité. -L’usine industrielle du XIXe siècle constitue toutefois une matrice archicratique spécifique, qu’il faut distinguer des autres institutions disciplinaires sans l’en séparer absolument. Elle ne se contente pas d’enfermer ou de surveiller ; elle organise la co-viabilité à partir de l’exigence productive elle-même. Ce qui y régule n’est pas seulement la conduite des corps, mais leur insertion dans un schéma opératoire orienté vers le rendement, la continuité de l’exécution et la coordination des fonctions. +L'usine industrielle du XIXe siècle constitue toutefois une matrice +archicratique spécifique, qu'il faut distinguer des autres institutions +disciplinaires sans l'en séparer absolument. Elle ne se contente pas +d'enfermer ou de surveiller ; elle organise la co-viabilité à partir de +l'exigence productive elle-même. Ce qui y régule n'est pas seulement la +conduite des corps, mais leur insertion dans un schéma opératoire +orienté vers le rendement, la continuité de l'exécution et la +coordination des fonctions. -L’arcalité industrielle ne repose plus principalement sur un rang hérité, sur une appartenance civique ou sur une vocation morale. Elle tend à se fixer dans l’ordre fonctionnel de la production : poste, tâche, séquence, rendement, utilité assignée. Le travailleur vaut d’abord comme occupant d’une place dans une chaîne d’opérations qui le dépasse. L’espace de l’usine, la répartition des ateliers, la division des gestes, la dépendance aux cadences de la machine ou de l’ensemble productif constituent ici moins un simple décor qu’un principe de fondation pratique. L’ordre devient recevable parce qu’il se présente comme nécessité de fonctionnement. +L'arcalité industrielle ne repose plus principalement sur un rang +hérité, sur une appartenance civique ou sur une vocation morale. Elle +tend à se fixer dans l'ordre fonctionnel de la production : poste, +tâche, séquence, rendement, utilité assignée. Le travailleur vaut +d'abord comme occupant d'une place dans une chaîne d'opérations qui le +dépasse. L'espace de l'usine, la répartition des ateliers, la division +des gestes, la dépendance aux cadences de la machine ou de l'ensemble +productif constituent ici moins un simple décor qu'un principe de +fondation pratique. L'ordre devient recevable parce qu'il se présente +comme nécessité de fonctionnement. -La cratialité, dans ce cadre, est fortement relayée. Elle ne procède pas seulement du propriétaire ou du directeur, mais de toute une hiérarchie intermédiaire de contremaîtres, chefs d’atelier, surveillants et commis, chargés de traduire l’impératif productif en injonctions concrètes. Leur pouvoir n’a rien d’abstrait : il se manifeste dans l’assignation des postes, le rappel à la cadence, la sanction des retards, le contrôle du geste, l’évaluation du rendement, la menace du renvoi ou du déclassement. Cette cratialité n’est pas encore bureaucratique au sens pleinement stabilisé qu’elle prendra plus tard, mais elle n’est déjà plus purement personnelle : elle est fonctionnelle, situationnelle, incorporée à l’organisation même du travail. +La cratialité, dans ce cadre, est fortement relayée. Elle ne procède pas +seulement du propriétaire ou du directeur, mais de toute une hiérarchie +intermédiaire de contremaîtres, chefs d'atelier, surveillants et commis, +chargés de traduire l'impératif productif en injonctions concrètes. Leur +pouvoir n'a rien d'abstrait : il se manifeste dans l'assignation des +postes, le rappel à la cadence, la sanction des retards, le contrôle du +geste, l'évaluation du rendement, la menace du renvoi ou du +déclassement. Cette cratialité n'est pas encore bureaucratique au sens +pleinement stabilisé qu'elle prendra plus tard, mais elle n'est déjà +plus purement personnelle : elle est fonctionnelle, situationnelle, +incorporée à l'organisation même du travail. -L’archicration industrielle s’exerce alors dans la manière dont la norme se trouve inscrite dans le milieu productif lui-même. Le temps n’y est pas seulement compté ; il devient exigence d’ajustement. Le geste n’y est pas seulement accompli ; il est rapporté à une séquence, à une attente, à une performance. La présence, l’absence, la lenteur, la maladresse, l’indiscipline deviennent lisibles à travers des procédures simples mais constantes : horaires, consignes, contrôles, rémunérations différenciées, retenues, primes, rythmes imposés. La règle n’a pas besoin d’être sans cesse proclamée, parce qu’elle s’objective dans l’enchaînement des opérations et dans les conséquences immédiates de l’écart. +L'archicration industrielle s'exerce alors dans la manière dont la norme +se trouve inscrite dans le milieu productif lui-même. Le temps n'y est +pas seulement compté ; il devient exigence d'ajustement. Le geste n'y +est pas seulement accompli ; il est rapporté à une séquence, à une +attente, à une performance. La présence, l'absence, la lenteur, la +maladresse, l'indiscipline deviennent lisibles à travers des procédures +simples mais constantes : horaires, consignes, contrôles, rémunérations +différenciées, retenues, primes, rythmes imposés. La règle n'a pas +besoin d'être sans cesse proclamée, parce qu'elle s'objective dans +l'enchaînement des opérations et dans les conséquences immédiates de +l'écart. -Il faut ici introduire un point décisif : l’usine n’est pas seulement régulée depuis l’extérieur par la loi ou par l’État ; elle tend à produire son propre monde normatif. L’ordre industriel n’exige pas seulement l’obéissance ; il fabrique une forme d’évidence pratique dans laquelle il devient naturel que chacun soit à sa place, à son heure, dans son rôle, selon son rendement attendu. C’est en ce sens que Marx peut montrer que la domination capitaliste ne passe pas uniquement par l’appropriation économique du travail, mais par une organisation matérielle et temporelle où le travail vivant se trouve de plus en plus subordonné à une logique abstraite de valorisation. +Il faut ici introduire un point décisif : l'usine n'est pas seulement +régulée depuis l'extérieur par la loi ou par l'État ; elle tend à +produire son propre monde normatif. L'ordre industriel n'exige pas +seulement l'obéissance ; il fabrique une forme d'évidence pratique dans +laquelle il devient naturel que chacun soit à sa place, à son heure, +dans son rôle, selon son rendement attendu. C'est en ce sens que Marx +peut montrer que la domination capitaliste ne passe pas uniquement par +l'appropriation économique du travail, mais par une organisation +matérielle et temporelle où le travail vivant se trouve de plus en plus +subordonné à une logique abstraite de valorisation. -Mais cette archicration industrielle ne peut être pleinement comprise si l’on ignore la figure qui en soutient encore largement l’arcalité : celle du patron. Au XIXe siècle, surtout avant la dissociation plus poussée entre propriété et direction, le propriétaire-capitaliste ne se réduit pas à un détenteur anonyme de capital. Il apparaît souvent comme le principe visible d’ordonnancement de l’univers productif : celui qui fixe les règles, distribue les places, légitime les hiérarchies, décide des rythmes et prétend parfois donner à l’ensemble une cohérence morale. L’arcalité patronale ne procède ni d’une transcendance ni d’un mandat public ; elle se fonde sur la propriété comme titre à organiser le monde du travail. +Mais cette archicration industrielle ne peut être pleinement comprise si +l'on ignore la figure qui en soutient encore largement l'arcalité : +celle du patron. Au XIXe siècle, surtout avant la dissociation plus +poussée entre propriété et direction, le propriétaire-capitaliste ne se +réduit pas à un détenteur anonyme de capital. Il apparaît souvent comme +le principe visible d'ordonnancement de l'univers productif : celui qui +fixe les règles, distribue les places, légitime les hiérarchies, décide +des rythmes et prétend parfois donner à l'ensemble une cohérence morale. +L'arcalité patronale ne procède ni d'une transcendance ni d'un mandat +public ; elle se fonde sur la propriété comme titre à organiser le monde +du travail. -Cette dimension apparaît avec une particulière netteté dans les configurations paternalistes. Logements ouvriers, écoles d’entreprise, dispensaires, coopératives, œuvres sociales, fêtes patronales : autant de dispositifs par lesquels le pouvoir industriel excède le strict atelier pour prétendre encadrer la vie sociale elle-même. Le patron n’y est pas qu’un chef de production ; il tend à se poser en garant d’un ordre global, à la fois économique, moral et spatial. La régulation devient alors plus profonde : elle ne vise plus seulement la conformité du travail, mais la stabilisation d’une fidélité, d’une dépendance, d’une adhésion pratique à un monde organisé autour de l’entreprise. +Cette dimension apparaît avec une particulière netteté dans les +configurations paternalistes. Logements ouvriers, écoles d'entreprise, +dispensaires, coopératives, œuvres sociales, fêtes patronales : autant +de dispositifs par lesquels le pouvoir industriel excède le strict +atelier pour prétendre encadrer la vie sociale elle-même. Le patron n'y +est pas qu'un chef de production ; il tend à se poser en garant d'un +ordre global, à la fois économique, moral et spatial. La régulation +devient alors plus profonde : elle ne vise plus seulement la conformité +du travail, mais la stabilisation d'une fidélité, d'une dépendance, +d'une adhésion pratique à un monde organisé autour de l'entreprise. -Il faut cependant éviter deux erreurs symétriques. La première consisterait à réduire l’usine à une simple extension du disciplinaire scolaire, carcéral ou militaire. La seconde serait d’y voir déjà le management scientifique pleinement formalisé du XXe siècle. Le XIXe siècle industriel occupe une position intermédiaire, mais décisive : la norme y est déjà fortement objectivée dans des dispositifs matériels et dans des hiérarchies fonctionnelles, sans que la rationalisation taylorienne ait encore entièrement décomposé le travail en protocoles abstraits d’optimisation. +Il faut cependant éviter deux erreurs symétriques. La première +consisterait à réduire l'usine à une simple extension du disciplinaire +scolaire, carcéral ou militaire. La seconde serait d'y voir déjà le +management scientifique pleinement formalisé du XXe siècle. Le XIXe +siècle industriel occupe une position intermédiaire, mais décisive : la +norme y est déjà fortement objectivée dans des dispositifs matériels et +dans des hiérarchies fonctionnelles, sans que la rationalisation +taylorienne ait encore entièrement décomposé le travail en protocoles +abstraits d'optimisation. -C’est pourquoi l’usine industrielle doit être lue comme une scène propre d’archicration : non plus principalement fondée sur la proclamation explicite de la règle, mais sur l’incorporation progressive d’une normativité de rendement, de présence, de cadence et de fonctionnalité. L’ordre n’y passe plus prioritairement par le prestige d’une figure, ni par l’ancienneté d’une coutume, ni même par la seule menace de la sanction ; il se stabilise dans un milieu où l’efficacité productive devient elle-même principe de recevabilité des conduites. +C'est pourquoi l'usine industrielle doit être lue comme une scène propre +d'archicration : non plus principalement fondée sur la proclamation +explicite de la règle, mais sur l'incorporation progressive d'une +normativité de rendement, de présence, de cadence et de fonctionnalité. +L'ordre n'y passe plus prioritairement par le prestige d'une figure, ni +par l'ancienneté d'une coutume, ni même par la seule menace de la +sanction ; il se stabilise dans un milieu où l'efficacité productive +devient elle-même principe de recevabilité des conduites. -Mais le XIXe siècle disciplinaire et industriel ne peut être compris à partir des seuls espaces métropolitains. Il est aussi le moment où les puissances européennes projettent hors d’elles-mêmes leurs formes de régulation, en les réagençant dans des dispositifs coloniaux profondément dissymétriques. L’ordre n’y vise pas d’abord la co-viabilité entre partenaires reconnus comme équivalents ; il s’établit sur une hiérarchisation radicale des statuts, des droits, des savoirs et des formes de vie. +Mais le XIXe siècle disciplinaire et industriel ne peut être compris à +partir des seuls espaces métropolitains. Il est aussi le moment où les +puissances européennes projettent hors d'elles-mêmes leurs formes de +régulation, en les réagençant dans des dispositifs coloniaux +profondément dissymétriques. L'ordre n'y vise pas d'abord la +co-viabilité entre partenaires reconnus comme équivalents ; il s'établit +sur une hiérarchisation radicale des statuts, des droits, des savoirs et +des formes de vie. -L’arcalité coloniale repose sur une prétention de supériorité civilisationnelle, juridique et morale par laquelle la métropole se donne comme centre légitime de la norme. Cette prétention ne se réduit pas à une idéologie extérieure au dispositif ; elle en constitue l’un des fondements opératoires. Elle autorise la requalification des sociétés dominées comme espaces à corriger, à administrer, à instruire ou à exploiter. Le droit, l’école, la mission, le recensement, la carte, l’impôt, l’encadrement du travail et la distinction statutaire concourent ici à une même opération : rendre les populations colonisées gouvernables à partir de catégories produites ailleurs. +L'arcalité coloniale repose sur une prétention de supériorité +civilisationnelle, juridique et morale par laquelle la métropole se +donne comme centre légitime de la norme. Cette prétention ne se réduit +pas à une idéologie extérieure au dispositif ; elle en constitue l'un +des fondements opératoires. Elle autorise la requalification des +sociétés dominées comme espaces à corriger, à administrer, à instruire +ou à exploiter. Le droit, l'école, la mission, le recensement, la carte, +l'impôt, l'encadrement du travail et la distinction statutaire +concourent ici à une même opération : rendre les populations colonisées +gouvernables à partir de catégories produites ailleurs. -La cratialité coloniale se déploie, quant à elle, dans une articulation serrée entre coercition militaire, administration territoriale, hiérarchies raciales et médiations locales subordonnées. Gouverneurs, commandants de cercle, auxiliaires indigènes, juges coloniaux, missionnaires, instituteurs, chefs reconnus ou fabriqués composent une chaîne de pouvoir dont l’efficacité tient précisément à cette combinaison de violence, de savoir et de délégation inégale. Loin d’être un simple supplément extérieur du régime moderne, le colonial en radicalise certains traits : classification des populations, segmentation des droits, traitement différentiel des mobilités, surveillance des croyances et des usages. +La cratialité coloniale se déploie, quant à elle, dans une articulation +serrée entre coercition militaire, administration territoriale, +hiérarchies raciales et médiations locales subordonnées. Gouverneurs, +commandants de cercle, auxiliaires indigènes, juges coloniaux, +missionnaires, instituteurs, chefs reconnus ou fabriqués composent une +chaîne de pouvoir dont l'efficacité tient précisément à cette +combinaison de violence, de savoir et de délégation inégale. Loin d'être +un simple supplément extérieur du régime moderne, le colonial en +radicalise certains traits : classification des populations, +segmentation des droits, traitement différentiel des mobilités, +surveillance des croyances et des usages. -L’archicration coloniale prend alors la forme d’une normativité d’exception devenue ordinaire. Codes particuliers, statuts différenciés, régimes juridiques inégaux, traductions sélectives des coutumes, reconnaissance intéressée de certaines autorités locales : l’ordre colonial ne se contente pas d’étendre la règle européenne ; il la fracture et la redouble. Il produit une co-viabilité asymétrique, dans laquelle la régulation ne vaut pas de manière homogène pour tous, mais organise au contraire une inégalité structurelle des scènes de recevabilité. +L'archicration coloniale prend alors la forme d'une normativité +d'exception devenue ordinaire. Codes particuliers, statuts différenciés, +régimes juridiques inégaux, traductions sélectives des coutumes, +reconnaissance intéressée de certaines autorités locales : l'ordre +colonial ne se contente pas d'étendre la règle européenne ; il la +fracture et la redouble. Il produit une co-viabilité asymétrique, dans +laquelle la régulation ne vaut pas de manière homogène pour tous, mais +organise au contraire une inégalité structurelle des scènes de +recevabilité. -Il faut cependant tenir ensemble domination coloniale et persistance d’autres grammaires de régulation. Les sociétés soumises ne se réduisent jamais complètement à l’ordre qui les encadre. Des formes autochtones, communautaires ou rituelles de co-viabilité subsistent, se recomposent, se déplacent ou se durcissent au contact même de la domination. Elles ne doivent pas être traitées comme de simples survivances folkloriques, mais comme des régimes effectifs, capables de maintenir des autorités, des mémoires, des procédures de décision et des horizons de légitimité irréductibles à la norme coloniale. +Il faut cependant tenir ensemble domination coloniale et persistance +d'autres grammaires de régulation. Les sociétés soumises ne se réduisent +jamais complètement à l'ordre qui les encadre. Des formes autochtones, +communautaires ou rituelles de co-viabilité subsistent, se recomposent, +se déplacent ou se durcissent au contact même de la domination. Elles ne +doivent pas être traitées comme de simples survivances folkloriques, +mais comme des régimes effectifs, capables de maintenir des autorités, +des mémoires, des procédures de décision et des horizons de légitimité +irréductibles à la norme coloniale. -Dans certains cas, cette persistance prend la forme d’une continuité communautaire : maintien de procédures orales, d’autorités tournantes, de régulations lignagères, de temporalités rituelles, de rapports cosmologiques au territoire. Dans d’autres, elle se traduit par des reconfigurations plus nouvelles : solidarités ouvrières, syndicats, mutuelles, formes de contre-institutionnalisation par lesquelles des groupes subalternes élaborent leurs propres scènes de coordination, de revendication et de discipline collective. Le XIXe siècle ne se réduit donc pas à l’universalisation d’un modèle unique ; il est aussi le lieu d’une confrontation entre plusieurs manières de rendre l’ordre pensable et praticable. +Dans certains cas, cette persistance prend la forme d'une continuité +communautaire : maintien de procédures orales, d'autorités tournantes, +de régulations lignagères, de temporalités rituelles, de rapports +cosmologiques au territoire. Dans d'autres, elle se traduit par des +reconfigurations plus nouvelles : solidarités ouvrières, syndicats, +mutuelles, formes de contre-institutionnalisation par lesquelles des +groupes subalternes élaborent leurs propres scènes de coordination, de +revendication et de discipline collective. Le XIXe siècle ne se réduit +donc pas à l'universalisation d'un modèle unique ; il est aussi le lieu +d'une confrontation entre plusieurs manières de rendre l'ordre pensable +et praticable. -C’est ici qu’apparaît la pluralité archicratique propre au siècle. D’un côté, une normativité objectivée, institutionnelle, industrielle et impériale, portée par l’État, l’entreprise et l’administration. De l’autre, des formes de régulation qui continuent de faire tenir la vie collective à partir de mémoires partagées, de récits, de rituels, d’accords communautaires ou de contre-organisations émergentes. L’intérêt de ce contraste n’est pas d’opposer mécaniquement modernité et tradition, centre et périphérie, domination et authenticité. Il est de montrer que le XIXe siècle constitue une scène d’intensification conflictuelle entre régimes archicratiques hétérogènes, irréductibles les uns aux autres. +C'est ici qu'apparaît la pluralité archicratique propre au siècle. D'un +côté, une normativité objectivée, institutionnelle, industrielle et +impériale, portée par l'État, l'entreprise et l'administration. De +l'autre, des formes de régulation qui continuent de faire tenir la vie +collective à partir de mémoires partagées, de récits, de rituels, +d'accords communautaires ou de contre-organisations émergentes. +L'intérêt de ce contraste n'est pas d'opposer mécaniquement modernité et +tradition, centre et périphérie, domination et authenticité. Il est de +montrer que le XIXe siècle constitue une scène d'intensification +conflictuelle entre régimes archicratiques hétérogènes, irréductibles +les uns aux autres. -Ce déplacement affecte les trois vecteurs à la fois. L’arcalité tend à s’objectiver dans des milieux réglés — scolaires, militaires, hospitaliers, pénitentiaires, industriels ou coloniaux — qui donnent à l’ordre une assise plus impersonnelle. La cratialité se distribue dans des chaînes d’agents, de surveillants, de contremaîtres, d’inspecteurs, de fonctionnaires et d’administrateurs, dont la puissance tient moins au prestige personnel qu’à leur position dans un dispositif. L’archicration, enfin, s’exerce dans les opérations mêmes par lesquelles les corps, les temps, les écarts et les performances deviennent observables, comparables et rectifiables. +Ce déplacement affecte les trois vecteurs à la fois. L'arcalité tend à +s'objectiver dans des milieux réglés — scolaires, militaires, +hospitaliers, pénitentiaires, industriels ou coloniaux — qui donnent à +l'ordre une assise plus impersonnelle. La cratialité se distribue dans +des chaînes d'agents, de surveillants, de contremaîtres, d'inspecteurs, +de fonctionnaires et d'administrateurs, dont la puissance tient moins au +prestige personnel qu'à leur position dans un dispositif. +L'archicration, enfin, s'exerce dans les opérations mêmes par lesquelles +les corps, les temps, les écarts et les performances deviennent +observables, comparables et rectifiables. -La nouveauté du siècle ne réside donc pas seulement dans l’intensification de la discipline, mais dans la généralisation d’une régulation par agencement. L’ordre se soutient moins par proclamation que par environnement, moins par rappel du fondement que par organisation concrète des situations. Ce basculement vaut aussi bien pour les institutions métropolitaines que pour les projections coloniales du pouvoir, où la normativité moderne se durcit en hiérarchie asymétrique et en administration différentielle des existences. +La nouveauté du siècle ne réside donc pas seulement dans +l'intensification de la discipline, mais dans la généralisation d'une +régulation par agencement. L'ordre se soutient moins par proclamation +que par environnement, moins par rappel du fondement que par +organisation concrète des situations. Ce basculement vaut aussi bien +pour les institutions métropolitaines que pour les projections +coloniales du pouvoir, où la normativité moderne se durcit en hiérarchie +asymétrique et en administration différentielle des existences. -Mais ce moment n’installe pas un régime univoque. À côté de cette objectivation croissante de la norme persistent, se recomposent ou émergent d’autres formes de co-viabilité : communautés, mémoires, contre-organisations, scènes de médiation et de revendication qui rappellent qu’aucun ordre disciplinaire n’absorbe jamais toute la pluralité des régimes de régulation. Le XIXe siècle doit ainsi être lu moins comme le triomphe simple d’une forme que comme l’intensification d’un conflit entre plusieurs grammaires archicratiques du lien collectif. +Mais ce moment n'installe pas un régime univoque. À côté de cette +objectivation croissante de la norme persistent, se recomposent ou +émergent d'autres formes de co-viabilité : communautés, mémoires, +contre-organisations, scènes de médiation et de revendication qui +rappellent qu'aucun ordre disciplinaire n'absorbe jamais toute la +pluralité des régimes de régulation. Le XIXe siècle doit ainsi être lu +moins comme le triomphe simple d'une forme que comme l'intensification +d'un conflit entre plusieurs grammaires archicratiques du lien +collectif. -C’est ce qui en fait un moment charnière pour notre enquête. En objectivant la règle dans des dispositifs de plus en plus continus, le XIXe siècle prépare les formes ultérieures de saturation normative, d’administration étendue et de gouvernement des populations. Mais il en laisse aussi paraître la contrepartie : fragilisation croissante des médiations, extension des asymétries et conflictualité nouvelle autour des conditions mêmes de la recevabilité sociale. La sous-section suivante examinera cette radicalisation au XXe siècle, lorsque la régulation tendra, selon des voies distinctes, à se totaliser dans les régimes de masse, les appareils bureaucratiques et les technologies politiques du vivant. +C'est ce qui en fait un moment charnière pour notre enquête. En +objectivant la règle dans des dispositifs de plus en plus continus, le +XIXe siècle prépare les formes ultérieures de saturation normative, +d'administration étendue et de gouvernement des populations. Mais il en +laisse aussi paraître la contrepartie : fragilisation croissante des +médiations, extension des asymétries et conflictualité nouvelle autour +des conditions mêmes de la recevabilité sociale. La sous-section +suivante examinera cette radicalisation au XXe siècle, lorsque la +régulation tendra, selon des voies distinctes, à se totaliser dans les +régimes de masse, les appareils bureaucratiques et les technologies +politiques du vivant. ### 2.3.5 — Régimes totalitaires : saturation normative, violence systémique, subjectivation totale -Les régimes totalitaires du XXe siècle constituent un seuil singulier dans l’histoire des formes de régulation. Ils ne constituent ni un simple durcissement de l’autorité classique, ni une dictature portée à son point extrême, ni même la seule radicalisation des dispositifs disciplinaires apparus au siècle précédent. Ils engagent une transformation plus profonde : la tentative de faire d’un principe unique de légitimation la matrice d’organisation de l’ensemble du monde social, et d’étendre cette emprise jusqu’aux conditions mêmes dans lesquelles une existence peut être dite recevable, pensable, exprimable et vécue. +Les régimes totalitaires du XXe siècle constituent un seuil singulier +dans l'histoire des formes de régulation. Ils ne constituent ni un +simple durcissement de l'autorité classique, ni une dictature portée à +son point extrême, ni même la seule radicalisation des dispositifs +disciplinaires apparus au siècle précédent. Ils engagent une +transformation plus profonde : la tentative de faire d'un principe +unique de légitimation la matrice d'organisation de l'ensemble du monde +social, et d'étendre cette emprise jusqu'aux conditions mêmes dans +lesquelles une existence peut être dite recevable, pensable, exprimable +et vécue. -C’est pourquoi le totalitarisme ne peut être saisi adéquatement si l’on en reste soit à la seule phénoménologie de la terreur, soit à une typologie politique trop générale des régimes de domination. Il faut le ressaisir dans sa logique propre : comme une forme de pouvoir qui ne se satisfait ni de l’obéissance extérieure, ni de la simple discipline des comportements, ni de l’encadrement administratif des populations, et qui travaille à réduire autant que possible la distance entre ordre prescrit, ordre perçu et ordre vécu. Là réside sa singularité : non pas seulement imposer un commandement plus violent, mais tendre vers une configuration du monde dans laquelle tout dehors devienne suspect, toute réserve coûteuse, toute hétérogénéité progressivement irrecevable. +C'est pourquoi le totalitarisme ne peut être saisi adéquatement si l'on +en reste soit à la seule phénoménologie de la terreur, soit à une +typologie politique trop générale des régimes de domination. Il faut le +ressaisir dans sa logique propre : comme une forme de pouvoir qui ne se +satisfait ni de l'obéissance extérieure, ni de la simple discipline des +comportements, ni de l'encadrement administratif des populations, et qui +travaille à réduire autant que possible la distance entre ordre +prescrit, ordre perçu et ordre vécu. Là réside sa singularité : non pas +seulement imposer un commandement plus violent, mais tendre vers une +configuration du monde dans laquelle tout dehors devienne suspect, toute +réserve coûteuse, toute hétérogénéité progressivement irrecevable. -Une telle configuration impose une discipline d’analyse particulière. La condamnation morale de ces régimes est évidemment nécessaire ; mais elle ne dispense pas d’en reconstruire la structure. Ce qu’il faut comprendre, ce n’est pas seulement l’ampleur de la violence qu’ils ont déployée, mais la manière dont ils sont parvenus à conférer à leur ordre la forme d’une totalité légitime, cohérente, apparemment indépassable. L’approche archicratique est ici décisive, parce qu’elle permet de décrire de manière articulée la condensation du fondement, la diffusion de la puissance et la fabrication des scènes dans lesquelles la norme devient sensible, partageable, incorporable, voire désirable. +Une telle configuration impose une discipline d'analyse particulière. La +condamnation morale de ces régimes est évidemment nécessaire ; mais elle +ne dispense pas d'en reconstruire la structure. Ce qu'il faut +comprendre, ce n'est pas seulement l'ampleur de la violence qu'ils ont +déployée, mais la manière dont ils sont parvenus à conférer à leur ordre +la forme d'une totalité légitime, cohérente, apparemment indépassable. +L'approche archicratique est ici décisive, parce qu'elle permet de +décrire de manière articulée la condensation du fondement, la diffusion +de la puissance et la fabrication des scènes dans lesquelles la norme +devient sensible, partageable, incorporable, voire désirable. -Le totalitarisme nous importe donc ici comme configuration-limite de la co-viabilité imposée. Il n’est pas seulement un excès de pouvoir ; il est une prétention à refermer l’espace même des possibles. Là où d’autres régimes maintiennent encore, malgré leur violence, une certaine pluralité de médiations, de traditions, de juridicités ou de scènes d’interprétation, les régimes totalitaires tendent au contraire à rabattre l’ensemble des existences sur un principe unique de vérité, d’appartenance et de conformité. Le problème n’y est plus simplement celui de l’obéissance ; il devient celui d’une mise en forme intégrale de la vie collective, jusque dans ses dimensions symboliques, affectives, perceptives et mémorielles. +Le totalitarisme nous importe donc ici comme configuration-limite de la +co-viabilité imposée. Il n'est pas seulement un excès de pouvoir ; il +est une prétention à refermer l'espace même des possibles. Là où +d'autres régimes maintiennent encore, malgré leur violence, une certaine +pluralité de médiations, de traditions, de juridicités ou de scènes +d'interprétation, les régimes totalitaires tendent au contraire à +rabattre l'ensemble des existences sur un principe unique de vérité, +d'appartenance et de conformité. Le problème n'y est plus simplement +celui de l'obéissance ; il devient celui d'une mise en forme intégrale +de la vie collective, jusque dans ses dimensions symboliques, +affectives, perceptives et mémorielles. -C’est en ce sens qu’ils doivent être lus comme une épreuve théorique majeure pour toute pensée de l’archicratie. Ils donnent à voir, sous une forme extrême, ce qui advient lorsque les trois vecteurs fondamentaux — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — cessent de se limiter, de se reprendre ou de se corriger mutuellement, et tendent au contraire à se renforcer dans un même mouvement de saturation. Le fondement se ferme, la puissance se diffuse, la norme investit les subjectivités, et l’ensemble du monde social se trouve travaillé par une logique de clôture qui ne tolère plus guère d’extériorité légitime. +C'est en ce sens qu'ils doivent être lus comme une épreuve théorique +majeure pour toute pensée de l'archicratie. Ils donnent à voir, sous une +forme extrême, ce qui advient lorsque les trois vecteurs fondamentaux — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — cessent de se limiter, de se +reprendre ou de se corriger mutuellement, et tendent au contraire à se +renforcer dans un même mouvement de saturation. Le fondement se ferme, +la puissance se diffuse, la norme investit les subjectivités, et +l'ensemble du monde social se trouve travaillé par une logique de +clôture qui ne tolère plus guère d'extériorité légitime. -Le premier trait distinctif de ces régimes tient à la construction d’une arcalité saturante, c’est-à-dire d’un principe de fondation porté à un tel degré d’absolu qu’il tend à subordonner, absorber ou disqualifier toute autre source possible de validité. Là où d’autres ordres composent encore avec des traditions juridiques, religieuses, savantes ou coutumières qu’ils ne maîtrisent jamais complètement, le totalitarisme travaille à produire un foyer exclusif de légitimation, à partir duquel deviennent pensables l’appartenance, l’exclusion, la correction et l’élimination. Race, histoire, nation, révolution, peuple : ces mots n’y valent pas comme thèmes idéologiques parmi d’autres, mais comme opérateurs de totalisation. +Le premier trait distinctif de ces régimes tient à la construction d'une +arcalité saturante, c'est-à-dire d'un principe de fondation porté à un +tel degré d'absolu qu'il tend à subordonner, absorber ou disqualifier +toute autre source possible de validité. Là où d'autres ordres composent +encore avec des traditions juridiques, religieuses, savantes ou +coutumières qu'ils ne maîtrisent jamais complètement, le totalitarisme +travaille à produire un foyer exclusif de légitimation, à partir duquel +deviennent pensables l'appartenance, l'exclusion, la correction et +l'élimination. Race, histoire, nation, révolution, peuple : ces mots n'y +valent pas comme thèmes idéologiques parmi d'autres, mais comme +opérateurs de totalisation. -Il faut toutefois distinguer finement les formes de cette absolutisation. Dans le nazisme, le fondement est projeté dans une fiction biologique du collectif. Le peuple n’y est pas une communauté politique au sens fort, encore moins une pluralité de sujets liés par une loi ; il est pensé comme corps vivant, comme unité organique menacée de corruption, de mélange et de dégénérescence. L’arcalité ne s’y contente donc pas de légitimer l’ordre : elle le naturalise. Elle fait de l’appartenance une affaire de sang, de filiation, d’hérédité, et du pouvoir une fonction d’épuration. C’est pourquoi le Führer n’y apparaît pas comme simple gouvernant, mais comme point de concentration d’une vérité supposée vitale du peuple. Le nazisme ne fonde pas seulement un ordre politique ; il prétend reconduire l’existence collective à une loi biologique devenue critère suprême du réel. +Il faut toutefois distinguer finement les formes de cette +absolutisation. Dans le nazisme, le fondement est projeté dans une +fiction biologique du collectif. Le peuple n'y est pas une communauté +politique au sens fort, encore moins une pluralité de sujets liés par +une loi ; il est pensé comme corps vivant, comme unité organique menacée +de corruption, de mélange et de dégénérescence. L'arcalité ne s'y +contente donc pas de légitimer l'ordre : elle le naturalise. Elle fait +de l'appartenance une affaire de sang, de filiation, d'hérédité, et du +pouvoir une fonction d'épuration. C'est pourquoi le Führer n'y apparaît +pas comme simple gouvernant, mais comme point de concentration d'une +vérité supposée vitale du peuple. Le nazisme ne fonde pas seulement un +ordre politique ; il prétend reconduire l'existence collective à une loi +biologique devenue critère suprême du réel. -Le stalinisme procède autrement, mais avec une violence structurelle comparable. Le fondement n’y est pas recherché dans la nature, mais dans l’histoire ; non dans la pureté d’un corps, mais dans la nécessité d’un devenir. Le Parti se présente comme l’instance capable de lire le sens du processus historique, d’en interpréter les étapes, d’en qualifier les ennemis et d’en précipiter l’accomplissement. L’arcalité soviétique ne naturalise donc pas le monde ; elle l’historicise intégralement. Chaque événement, chaque retard, chaque résistance, chaque déviation peut y être réinscrit dans une téléologie générale dont le Parti détient seul la clé. Ce qui en résulte n’est pas une simple politisation de l’histoire, mais une captation du temps lui-même : le futur devient source de légitimation du présent, et la vérité du régime se mesure à sa prétention d’en connaître d’avance la direction nécessaire. +Le stalinisme procède autrement, mais avec une violence structurelle +comparable. Le fondement n'y est pas recherché dans la nature, mais dans +l'histoire ; non dans la pureté d'un corps, mais dans la nécessité d'un +devenir. Le Parti se présente comme l'instance capable de lire le sens +du processus historique, d'en interpréter les étapes, d'en qualifier les +ennemis et d'en précipiter l'accomplissement. L'arcalité soviétique ne +naturalise donc pas le monde ; elle l'historicise intégralement. Chaque +événement, chaque retard, chaque résistance, chaque déviation peut y +être réinscrit dans une téléologie générale dont le Parti détient seul +la clé. Ce qui en résulte n'est pas une simple politisation de +l'histoire, mais une captation du temps lui-même : le futur devient +source de légitimation du présent, et la vérité du régime se mesure à sa +prétention d'en connaître d'avance la direction nécessaire. -Le fascisme italien occupe une position différente encore. Moins obsédé que le nazisme par la biologisation systématique, moins arrimé que le stalinisme à une téléologie historique totalisante, il travaille une arcalité du présent héroïsé. Son foyer de légitimation réside dans l’intensification liturgique de la Nation, dans la stylisation virile du commandement, dans la mise en scène d’une unité à faire sentir plutôt qu’à démontrer. Ici, le fondement ne s’impose pas d’abord comme loi de nature ou sens de l’histoire, mais comme évidence performée : celle d’un corps national qui ne doit pas tant être expliqué que célébré, rassemblé, exalté. Le fascisme produit ainsi une arcalité de l’incarnation spectaculaire, où le chef, la foule, les symboles et la mémoire impériale se renvoient mutuellement une légitimité nourrie d’émotion publique, d’esthétique politique et de théâtralité collective. +Le fascisme italien occupe une position différente encore. Moins obsédé +que le nazisme par la biologisation systématique, moins arrimé que le +stalinisme à une téléologie historique totalisante, il travaille une +arcalité du présent héroïsé. Son foyer de légitimation réside dans +l'intensification liturgique de la Nation, dans la stylisation virile du +commandement, dans la mise en scène d'une unité à faire sentir plutôt +qu'à démontrer. Ici, le fondement ne s'impose pas d'abord comme loi de +nature ou sens de l'histoire, mais comme évidence performée : celle d'un +corps national qui ne doit pas tant être expliqué que célébré, +rassemblé, exalté. Le fascisme produit ainsi une arcalité de +l'incarnation spectaculaire, où le chef, la foule, les symboles et la +mémoire impériale se renvoient mutuellement une légitimité nourrie +d'émotion publique, d'esthétique politique et de théâtralité collective. -Le maoïsme, enfin, introduit une torsion décisive dans ce paysage. Son arcalité ne se stabilise ni dans une essence raciale, ni dans une simple monumentalisation de la nation, ni même dans une téléologie historique aussi figée que celle du stalinisme tardif. Elle repose sur une logique de refondation continue, sur la mise en état de mobilisation permanente du corps politique. Le fondement y tient moins à une fixité qu’à une capacité de réouverture violente : rouvrir la révolution, rouvrir la lutte, rouvrir le procès de la pureté idéologique. Le chef y vaut comme point d’autorisation suprême de cette reprise incessante. C’est ce qui donne à l’arcalité maoïste sa tonalité propre : non la stabilité dogmatique d’un ordre une fois pour toutes posé, mais la sacralisation d’une instabilité tenue pour seule garantie de fidélité révolutionnaire. +Le maoïsme, enfin, introduit une torsion décisive dans ce paysage. Son +arcalité ne se stabilise ni dans une essence raciale, ni dans une simple +monumentalisation de la nation, ni même dans une téléologie historique +aussi figée que celle du stalinisme tardif. Elle repose sur une logique +de refondation continue, sur la mise en état de mobilisation permanente +du corps politique. Le fondement y tient moins à une fixité qu'à une +capacité de réouverture violente : rouvrir la révolution, rouvrir la +lutte, rouvrir le procès de la pureté idéologique. Le chef y vaut comme +point d'autorisation suprême de cette reprise incessante. C'est ce qui +donne à l'arcalité maoïste sa tonalité propre : non la stabilité +dogmatique d'un ordre une fois pour toutes posé, mais la sacralisation +d'une instabilité tenue pour seule garantie de fidélité révolutionnaire. -Ces quatre figures ne se confondent donc nullement. Le nazisme absolutise une appartenance biologique ; le stalinisme absolutise le sens de l’histoire ; le fascisme absolutise l’unité sensible de la nation ; le maoïsme absolutise la reprise révolutionnaire elle-même. Mais elles convergent en un point décisif : chacune porte un principe de légitimation à un degré tel qu’aucune altérité régulatrice ne peut plus subsister comme contrepoids recevable. Religion, juridicité indépendante, savoir savant autonome, mémoire dissidente, communauté partiellement extérieure : tout doit être absorbé, subordonné, ou dénoncé comme menace. +Ces quatre figures ne se confondent donc nullement. Le nazisme +absolutise une appartenance biologique ; le stalinisme absolutise le +sens de l'histoire ; le fascisme absolutise l'unité sensible de la +nation ; le maoïsme absolutise la reprise révolutionnaire elle-même. +Mais elles convergent en un point décisif : chacune porte un principe de +légitimation à un degré tel qu'aucune altérité régulatrice ne peut plus +subsister comme contrepoids recevable. Religion, juridicité +indépendante, savoir savant autonome, mémoire dissidente, communauté +partiellement extérieure : tout doit être absorbé, subordonné, ou +dénoncé comme menace. -C’est en cela que l’arcalité totalitaire excède la simple fonction de fondation. Elle ne se borne pas à justifier un ordre déjà là ; elle requalifie le réel dans son ensemble. Elle distribue les existences selon leur degré d’assimilabilité, autorise la mobilisation des conformes, la rectification des douteux, l’exclusion des hérétiques, l’élimination des inassimilables. Le fondement devient ainsi principe de tri ontologico-politique : non plus seulement ce à partir de quoi l’ordre se dit légitime, mais ce à partir de quoi il décide ce qui mérite encore d’appartenir au monde commun. +C'est en cela que l'arcalité totalitaire excède la simple fonction de +fondation. Elle ne se borne pas à justifier un ordre déjà là ; elle +requalifie le réel dans son ensemble. Elle distribue les existences +selon leur degré d'assimilabilité, autorise la mobilisation des +conformes, la rectification des douteux, l'exclusion des hérétiques, +l'élimination des inassimilables. Le fondement devient ainsi principe de +tri ontologico-politique : non plus seulement ce à partir de quoi +l'ordre se dit légitime, mais ce à partir de quoi il décide ce qui +mérite encore d'appartenir au monde commun. -La cratialité totalitaire ne doit pas être pensée comme simple concentration verticale de la puissance. Certes, le chef, le parti, la ligne idéologique forment le sommet visible du régime. Mais l’effectivité de celui-ci dépend d’autre chose : sa capacité à descendre, à se relayer, à se distribuer dans les épaisseurs ordinaires du social. Là réside sa redoutable efficacité. Le pouvoir n’y règne pas seulement depuis un centre ; il sédimente dans une multiplicité de relais qui, sans cesser de renvoyer au sommet, traduisent la norme en contrôle local, en vérification continue, en interventions de détail. +La cratialité totalitaire ne doit pas être pensée comme simple +concentration verticale de la puissance. Certes, le chef, le parti, la +ligne idéologique forment le sommet visible du régime. Mais +l'effectivité de celui-ci dépend d'autre chose : sa capacité à +descendre, à se relayer, à se distribuer dans les épaisseurs ordinaires +du social. Là réside sa redoutable efficacité. Le pouvoir n'y règne pas +seulement depuis un centre ; il sédimente dans une multiplicité de +relais qui, sans cesser de renvoyer au sommet, traduisent la norme en +contrôle local, en vérification continue, en interventions de détail. -Le premier ressort en est le monopole intégral du politique. Non au sens banal où un parti dominerait les autres, mais au sens plus profond où aucune institution ne peut plus prétendre exister selon sa logique propre. Syndicats, universités, presse, associations, professions, organisations de jeunesse, voisinage même : tout doit devenir organe, prolongement, capillarité du centre. Il ne s’agit donc pas simplement d’interdire l’autonomie ; il s’agit de dissoudre les conditions mêmes dans lesquelles elle pourrait se reformer. Une extériorité institutionnelle durable deviendrait aussitôt une menace. +Le premier ressort en est le monopole intégral du politique. Non au sens +banal où un parti dominerait les autres, mais au sens plus profond où +aucune institution ne peut plus prétendre exister selon sa logique +propre. Syndicats, universités, presse, associations, professions, +organisations de jeunesse, voisinage même : tout doit devenir organe, +prolongement, capillarité du centre. Il ne s'agit donc pas simplement +d'interdire l'autonomie ; il s'agit de dissoudre les conditions mêmes +dans lesquelles elle pourrait se reformer. Une extériorité +institutionnelle durable deviendrait aussitôt une menace. -À cette absorption générale s’ajoute la puissance d’une bureaucratie qui n’a plus rien de neutre. Elle ne se borne pas à enregistrer ; elle qualifie. Dossiers individuels, autorisations, affectations, enquêtes, listes de surveillance, catégories administratives, contrôles de déplacement ou de travail : autant d’opérations qui ne se contentent pas de suivre les existences, mais les traduisent dans un langage traitable par le régime. L’individu cesse alors d’apparaître comme sujet irréductible ; il devient combinaison de signes, cas à suivre, profil à classer, trajectoire à orienter. Le pouvoir ne connaît jamais totalement les vies qu’il encadre, mais il les rend suffisamment lisibles pour les gouverner. +À cette absorption générale s'ajoute la puissance d'une bureaucratie qui +n'a plus rien de neutre. Elle ne se borne pas à enregistrer ; elle +qualifie. Dossiers individuels, autorisations, affectations, enquêtes, +listes de surveillance, catégories administratives, contrôles de +déplacement ou de travail : autant d'opérations qui ne se contentent pas +de suivre les existences, mais les traduisent dans un langage traitable +par le régime. L'individu cesse alors d'apparaître comme sujet +irréductible ; il devient combinaison de signes, cas à suivre, profil à +classer, trajectoire à orienter. Le pouvoir ne connaît jamais totalement +les vies qu'il encadre, mais il les rend suffisamment lisibles pour les +gouverner. -De là naît un climat spécifique, qui n’est pas seulement celui de la peur, mais celui du soupçon. L’écart n’attend pas d’être pleinement manifeste pour devenir objet d’attention. Il se laisse pressentir dans une hésitation, un retard, une réserve, une fidélité tiède, un mot mal placé, une absence d’enthousiasme. Le régime ne surveille pas uniquement ce qui se fait ; il apprend à traquer ce qui pourrait ne pas s’aligner. Cette anticipation transforme l’incertitude sociale en milieu de vigilance généralisée. Nul n’est seulement surveillé par le sommet ; chacun devient, à des degrés variables, observateur, relais ou évaluateur d’autrui. +De là naît un climat spécifique, qui n'est pas seulement celui de la +peur, mais celui du soupçon. L'écart n'attend pas d'être pleinement +manifeste pour devenir objet d'attention. Il se laisse pressentir dans +une hésitation, un retard, une réserve, une fidélité tiède, un mot mal +placé, une absence d'enthousiasme. Le régime ne surveille pas uniquement +ce qui se fait ; il apprend à traquer ce qui pourrait ne pas s'aligner. +Cette anticipation transforme l'incertitude sociale en milieu de +vigilance généralisée. Nul n'est seulement surveillé par le sommet ; +chacun devient, à des degrés variables, observateur, relais ou +évaluateur d'autrui. -L’archicration totalitaire prend alors le relais au plus intime. Elle ne consiste pas seulement à diffuser une doctrine. Elle travaille les conditions dans lesquelles la conformité devient sensible, presque naturelle. Le langage, ici, n’est pas un simple instrument de propagande. Il redécoupe le dicible. Les mots disponibles, les oppositions légitimes, les désignations de l’ennemi, les formules de fidélité, les tours obligés de l’adhésion resserrent progressivement l’espace dans lequel un écart pourrait être articulé. Quand la langue se raidit, le doute cesse d’être seulement dangereux : il devient plus difficile à former. +L'archicration totalitaire prend alors le relais au plus intime. Elle ne +consiste pas seulement à diffuser une doctrine. Elle travaille les +conditions dans lesquelles la conformité devient sensible, presque +naturelle. Le langage, ici, n'est pas un simple instrument de +propagande. Il redécoupe le dicible. Les mots disponibles, les +oppositions légitimes, les désignations de l'ennemi, les formules de +fidélité, les tours obligés de l'adhésion resserrent progressivement +l'espace dans lequel un écart pourrait être articulé. Quand la langue se +raidit, le doute cesse d'être seulement dangereux : il devient plus +difficile à former. -Mais la langue seule n’emporte pas l’adhésion. Il faut encore des scènes. Défilés, serments, chants, cérémonies, séances d’autocritique, gestes codifiés de fidélité, rythmes collectifs : autant de formes par lesquelles l’ordre se donne non comme abstraction, mais comme expérience. Le corps y est requis, la voix sollicitée, l’émotion encadrée. La norme n’est plus seulement énoncée ; elle se fait atmosphère partagée. Elle devient visible, répétable, presque respirable. +Mais la langue seule n'emporte pas l'adhésion. Il faut encore des +scènes. Défilés, serments, chants, cérémonies, séances d'autocritique, +gestes codifiés de fidélité, rythmes collectifs : autant de formes par +lesquelles l'ordre se donne non comme abstraction, mais comme +expérience. Le corps y est requis, la voix sollicitée, l'émotion +encadrée. La norme n'est plus seulement énoncée ; elle se fait +atmosphère partagée. Elle devient visible, répétable, presque +respirable. -L’esthétique intervient ici avec une force singulière. Elle ne vient pas embellir le régime après coup ; elle participe de sa consistance même. Architecture monumentale, mise en scène du chef, symboles omniprésents, stylisation des corps, chorégraphie des foules : tout cela travaille à saturer le champ perceptif. Le monde n’est plus simplement administré ; il est organisé pour apparaître selon une grammaire unique du pur, du fort, de l’ordonné, du fidèle. Ce que l’image accomplit alors n’est pas de l’ordre du simple décor. Elle hiérarchise silencieusement le visible. Elle apprend à reconnaître les corps légitimes, les gestes conformes, les existences honorables — et, symétriquement, celles qui doivent être dégradées, exclues, effacées. +L'esthétique intervient ici avec une force singulière. Elle ne vient pas +embellir le régime après coup ; elle participe de sa consistance même. +Architecture monumentale, mise en scène du chef, symboles omniprésents, +stylisation des corps, chorégraphie des foules : tout cela travaille à +saturer le champ perceptif. Le monde n'est plus simplement administré ; +il est organisé pour apparaître selon une grammaire unique du pur, du +fort, de l'ordonné, du fidèle. Ce que l'image accomplit alors n'est pas +de l'ordre du simple décor. Elle hiérarchise silencieusement le visible. +Elle apprend à reconnaître les corps légitimes, les gestes conformes, +les existences honorables — et, symétriquement, celles qui doivent +être dégradées, exclues, effacées. -Cette emprise gagne très tôt les jeunes générations. L’enfance n’est pas laissée en réserve ; elle devient terrain de captation. L’école, l’organisation de jeunesse, le récit héroïque, l’exercice collectif, la discipline du groupe, les modèles imposés forment un même continuum. Il ne s’agit pas seulement d’enseigner une doctrine à de futurs adultes, mais de produire précocement des réflexes d’appartenance, des habitudes affectives, un rapport déjà orienté au vrai, à l’ennemi, au sacrifice, au collectif. Former l’enfant, ici, c’est déjà disposer d’un relais de la norme. +Cette emprise gagne très tôt les jeunes générations. L'enfance n'est pas +laissée en réserve ; elle devient terrain de captation. L'école, +l'organisation de jeunesse, le récit héroïque, l'exercice collectif, la +discipline du groupe, les modèles imposés forment un même continuum. Il +ne s'agit pas seulement d'enseigner une doctrine à de futurs adultes, +mais de produire précocement des réflexes d'appartenance, des habitudes +affectives, un rapport déjà orienté au vrai, à l'ennemi, au sacrifice, +au collectif. Former l'enfant, ici, c'est déjà disposer d'un relais de +la norme. -Le même geste vaut pour toute production autonome de sens. Écrivains, savants, artistes, enseignants ne sont tolérés qu’à condition d’entrer dans le rôle d’exégètes du dogme. Ce que le totalitarisme ne supporte pas, ce n’est pas seulement la dissidence ouverte. C’est la persistance de lieux où pourrait se former une autre scène d’interprétation. Une nuance déplacée, une ambiguïté maintenue, un silence trop lourd, un texte qui n’aligne pas ses évidences : il n’en faut pas davantage pour que surgisse le soupçon. Le régime ne veut pas seulement diffuser un sens officiel ; il veut empêcher qu’une autre configuration de lisibilité puisse tenir. +Le même geste vaut pour toute production autonome de sens. Écrivains, +savants, artistes, enseignants ne sont tolérés qu'à condition d'entrer +dans le rôle d'exégètes du dogme. Ce que le totalitarisme ne supporte +pas, ce n'est pas seulement la dissidence ouverte. C'est la persistance +de lieux où pourrait se former une autre scène d'interprétation. Une +nuance déplacée, une ambiguïté maintenue, un silence trop lourd, un +texte qui n'aligne pas ses évidences : il n'en faut pas davantage pour +que surgisse le soupçon. Le régime ne veut pas seulement diffuser un +sens officiel ; il veut empêcher qu'une autre configuration de +lisibilité puisse tenir. -Mais cette fabrication du conforme ne suffit pas encore. Il faut des infrastructures qui rendent une autre vie matériellement de plus en plus improbable. C’est ici qu’interviennent le camp, la presse unique, la radio contrôlée, l’édition surveillée, l’école recodée, le travail investi comme critère moral et politique, les procédures de classement qui transforment les existences en séries lisibles. Le camp, à l’extrême, matérialise le pouvoir de retrancher des êtres de l’ordre commun tout en les maintenant sous prise. Ailleurs, des dispositifs moins spectaculaires poursuivent la même opération par d’autres voies : faire que ce qui arrive n’existe socialement que dans les catégories autorisées ; faire que ce qui se vit puisse être saisi, comparé, orienté ; faire que ce qui s’écarte apparaisse déjà comme anomalie. +Mais cette fabrication du conforme ne suffit pas encore. Il faut des +infrastructures qui rendent une autre vie matériellement de plus en plus +improbable. C'est ici qu'interviennent le camp, la presse unique, la +radio contrôlée, l'édition surveillée, l'école recodée, le travail +investi comme critère moral et politique, les procédures de classement +qui transforment les existences en séries lisibles. Le camp, à +l'extrême, matérialise le pouvoir de retrancher des êtres de l'ordre +commun tout en les maintenant sous prise. Ailleurs, des dispositifs +moins spectaculaires poursuivent la même opération par d'autres voies : +faire que ce qui arrive n'existe socialement que dans les catégories +autorisées ; faire que ce qui se vit puisse être saisi, comparé, orienté +; faire que ce qui s'écarte apparaisse déjà comme anomalie. -Se dessine alors une fermeture progressive des bords. Presse indépendante, mémoire non officielle, autonomie pédagogique, espace religieux libre, sociabilité non encadrée, temporalité privée, langage non aligné : tout ce qui pourrait soutenir une normativité autre devient plus difficile à habiter. Le monde se rétracte autour du régime. Pourtant, cette clôture n’atteint jamais son achèvement absolu. Il demeure des restes, des réserves minimes, des opacités : silence non capturé, ironie clandestine, texte caché, fidélité souterraine, refus sans déclaration. Ces formes ne suffisent pas à renverser le système. Elles en marquent cependant la limite. Le totalitarisme pousse jusqu’à son seuil extrême la logique de clôture archicratique ; mais il rencontre toujours, dans l’épaisseur même du vivant, quelque chose qu’il ne parvient pas à refermer tout à fait. +Se dessine alors une fermeture progressive des bords. Presse +indépendante, mémoire non officielle, autonomie pédagogique, espace +religieux libre, sociabilité non encadrée, temporalité privée, langage +non aligné : tout ce qui pourrait soutenir une normativité autre devient +plus difficile à habiter. Le monde se rétracte autour du régime. +Pourtant, cette clôture n'atteint jamais son achèvement absolu. Il +demeure des restes, des réserves minimes, des opacités : silence non +capturé, ironie clandestine, texte caché, fidélité souterraine, refus +sans déclaration. Ces formes ne suffisent pas à renverser le système. +Elles en marquent cependant la limite. Le totalitarisme pousse jusqu'à +son seuil extrême la logique de clôture archicratique ; mais il +rencontre toujours, dans l'épaisseur même du vivant, quelque chose qu'il +ne parvient pas à refermer tout à fait. -Au terme de ce parcours, le totalitarisme apparaît moins comme une simple forme extrême de domination que comme une épreuve-limite pour toute pensée de l’archicratie. Ce qu’il porte à son point de tension maximal, ce n’est pas seulement l’intensité de la violence ni l’extension du contrôle, mais la volonté de faire tenir ensemble, sans reste, un fondement exclusif, une puissance omniprésente, une production intensive du conforme et une réduction systématique des extérieurs possibles. Il ne cherche pas seulement à gouverner un monde déjà là ; il travaille à le reformater à partir d’un principe unique de vérité, d’appartenance et de recevabilité. +Au terme de ce parcours, le totalitarisme apparaît moins comme une +simple forme extrême de domination que comme une épreuve-limite pour +toute pensée de l'archicratie. Ce qu'il porte à son point de tension +maximal, ce n'est pas seulement l'intensité de la violence ni +l'extension du contrôle, mais la volonté de faire tenir ensemble, sans +reste, un fondement exclusif, une puissance omniprésente, une production +intensive du conforme et une réduction systématique des extérieurs +possibles. Il ne cherche pas seulement à gouverner un monde déjà là ; il +travaille à le reformater à partir d'un principe unique de vérité, +d'appartenance et de recevabilité. -C’est pourquoi le totalitarisme ne peut être rabattu ni sur la seule figure de la dictature, ni sur celle d’une hypertrophie administrative, ni même sur celle d’un autoritarisme plus brutal que les autres. Il constitue une forme spécifique de saturation archicratique. L’arcalité y devient absolue ; la cratialité s’y diffuse jusqu’aux interstices les plus ordinaires de l’existence ; l’archicration y travaille les conditions mêmes dans lesquelles on parle, on perçoit, on se souvient, on s’oriente, on appartient. Race, histoire, nation, révolution : ces mots n’y légitiment pas seulement le pouvoir ; ils servent à qualifier le réel tout entier, à distribuer le conforme et l’inassimilable, le récupérable et l’éliminable. +C'est pourquoi le totalitarisme ne peut être rabattu ni sur la seule +figure de la dictature, ni sur celle d'une hypertrophie administrative, +ni même sur celle d'un autoritarisme plus brutal que les autres. Il +constitue une forme spécifique de saturation archicratique. L'arcalité y +devient absolue ; la cratialité s'y diffuse jusqu'aux interstices les +plus ordinaires de l'existence ; l'archicration y travaille les +conditions mêmes dans lesquelles on parle, on perçoit, on se souvient, +on s'oriente, on appartient. Race, histoire, nation, révolution : ces +mots n'y légitiment pas seulement le pouvoir ; ils servent à qualifier +le réel tout entier, à distribuer le conforme et l'inassimilable, le +récupérable et l'éliminable. -Mais cette logique, précisément parce qu’elle tend à la clôture parfaite, laisse aussi apparaître ce qu’elle ne peut abolir. Il peut réduire, capturer, isoler, déplacer, reconfigurer, anéantir ; il ne parvient pourtant jamais à supprimer absolument restes, opacités, survivances, fidélités souterraines ou mémoires non absorbées. Sa violence la plus propre tient à cette poursuite obstinée d’une coïncidence impossible entre l’ordre prescrit et le vivant. +Mais cette logique, précisément parce qu'elle tend à la clôture +parfaite, laisse aussi apparaître ce qu'elle ne peut abolir. Il peut +réduire, capturer, isoler, déplacer, reconfigurer, anéantir ; il ne +parvient pourtant jamais à supprimer absolument restes, opacités, +survivances, fidélités souterraines ou mémoires non absorbées. Sa +violence la plus propre tient à cette poursuite obstinée d'une +coïncidence impossible entre l'ordre prescrit et le vivant. -Il faut tenir ensemble ces deux propositions. D’une part, le totalitarisme représente bien l’une des formes les plus extrêmes de la régulation moderne, parce qu’il pousse jusqu’à un degré inédit la volonté de configurer l’existence dans toutes ses dimensions. D’autre part, il révèle négativement la limite de toute prétention archicratique à refermer le monde sur un seul principe. En cela, il n’est pas seulement un objet historique parmi d’autres ; il est un avertissement théorique majeur : là où le fondement s’absolutise, où la puissance se dissémine sans reste, où la norme prétend devenir le milieu intégral de l’existence, la co-viabilité cesse d’être tenue du monde commun pour devenir entreprise de réduction du vivant. +Il faut tenir ensemble ces deux propositions. D'une part, le +totalitarisme représente bien l'une des formes les plus extrêmes de la +régulation moderne, parce qu'il pousse jusqu'à un degré inédit la +volonté de configurer l'existence dans toutes ses dimensions. D'autre +part, il révèle négativement la limite de toute prétention archicratique +à refermer le monde sur un seul principe. En cela, il n'est pas +seulement un objet historique parmi d'autres ; il est un avertissement +théorique majeur : là où le fondement s'absolutise, où la puissance se +dissémine sans reste, où la norme prétend devenir le milieu intégral de +l'existence, la co-viabilité cesse d'être tenue du monde commun pour +devenir entreprise de réduction du vivant. -Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les grandes configurations ici étudiées. La sous-section suivante n’aura pas pour tâche de raconter une sortie simple hors du totalitaire, ni de suggérer qu’après la mobilisation intégrale viendrait enfin le temps paisible d’une régulation sans violence. Elle devra plutôt examiner d’autres figures du XXe siècle, dans lesquelles la norme change de texture, de rythme et de vecteurs, sans renoncer pour autant à organiser les conduites, à distribuer les places et à gouverner les existences. +Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les grandes +configurations ici étudiées. La sous-section suivante n'aura pas pour +tâche de raconter une sortie simple hors du totalitaire, ni de suggérer +qu'après la mobilisation intégrale viendrait enfin le temps paisible +d'une régulation sans violence. Elle devra plutôt examiner d'autres +figures du XXe siècle, dans lesquelles la norme change de texture, de +rythme et de vecteurs, sans renoncer pour autant à organiser les +conduites, à distribuer les places et à gouverner les existences. ### 2.3.6 — Régimes démocratiques : biopolitique et État-providence -Les régimes démocratiques providentiels issus de l’après-guerre ne doivent pas être lus comme une simple restauration de la normalité politique après la séquence totalitaire. Une telle lecture manquerait l’essentiel : ce qui s’installe alors n’est pas la disparition de la régulation intensive, mais sa recomposition dans un régime moins spectaculaire, moins confessionnel, moins frontalement terrorisant, et pourtant profondément structurant. La violence ne s’y abolit pas ; elle change de forme, de rythme, de justification et de visibilité. +Les régimes démocratiques providentiels issus de l'après-guerre ne +doivent pas être lus comme une simple restauration de la normalité +politique après la séquence totalitaire. Une telle lecture manquerait +l'essentiel : ce qui s'installe alors n'est pas la disparition de la +régulation intensive, mais sa recomposition dans un régime moins +spectaculaire, moins confessionnel, moins frontalement terrorisant, et +pourtant profondément structurant. La violence ne s'y abolit pas ; elle +change de forme, de rythme, de justification et de visibilité. -Ce déplacement est décisif. Avec la démocratie libérale-sociale, le pouvoir ne s’affirme plus prioritairement sous la figure d’un centre souverain exigeant l’adhésion idéologique totale, mais à travers une organisation plus diffuse des existences, fondée sur la protection, l’assurance, la prise en charge, la prévoyance et la gestion des risques. L’ordre ne se présente plus d’abord comme exigence de mobilisation ; il s’offre comme cadre de sécurité. C’est précisément cette conversion de la contrainte visible en co-viabilité assurantielle qui donne au régime sa tonalité propre. +Ce déplacement est décisif. Avec la démocratie libérale-sociale, le +pouvoir ne s'affirme plus prioritairement sous la figure d'un centre +souverain exigeant l'adhésion idéologique totale, mais à travers une +organisation plus diffuse des existences, fondée sur la protection, +l'assurance, la prise en charge, la prévoyance et la gestion des +risques. L'ordre ne se présente plus d'abord comme exigence de +mobilisation ; il s'offre comme cadre de sécurité. C'est précisément +cette conversion de la contrainte visible en co-viabilité assurantielle +qui donne au régime sa tonalité propre. -Il faut donc éviter deux contresens symétriques. Le premier consisterait à voir dans l’État-providence démocratique une pure rupture émancipatrice avec les régimes disciplinaires et totalitaires. Le second serait de n’y lire qu’une simple version adoucie de ces derniers. Ni sortie simple hors de la domination, ni continuité brute sous visage modéré : le régime démocratique providentiel constitue une configuration archicratique spécifique, dotée de sa cohérence propre. Sa singularité tient à l’articulation d’une arcalité fondée sur les droits sociaux et la souveraineté populaire, d’une cratialité bureaucratique et assurantielle appliquée aux trajectoires de vie, et d’une archicration pluralisée, dispersée dans des arènes de discussion, de contentieux, de négociation et de contestation. +Il faut donc éviter deux contresens symétriques. Le premier consisterait +à voir dans l'État-providence démocratique une pure rupture +émancipatrice avec les régimes disciplinaires et totalitaires. Le second +serait de n'y lire qu'une simple version adoucie de ces derniers. Ni +sortie simple hors de la domination, ni continuité brute sous visage +modéré : le régime démocratique providentiel constitue une configuration +archicratique spécifique, dotée de sa cohérence propre. Sa singularité +tient à l'articulation d'une arcalité fondée sur les droits sociaux et +la souveraineté populaire, d'une cratialité bureaucratique et +assurantielle appliquée aux trajectoires de vie, et d'une archicration +pluralisée, dispersée dans des arènes de discussion, de contentieux, de +négociation et de contestation. -Sous cet angle, cette sous-section occupe une position stratégique dans l’économie générale du chapitre. En amont, les sociétés disciplinaires et totalitaires avaient porté à un haut degré de visibilité la verticalité du commandement, la saturation idéologique ou l’objectivation des conduites. En aval, les régimes cybernétiques et numériques déplaceront encore la norme vers l’adaptation continue, la captation comportementale et l’automatisation partielle des régulations. La configuration providentielle ne se confond avec aucun de ces deux pôles. Elle forme un moment propre, dans lequel la régulation devient plus enveloppante que spectaculaire, plus procédurale que confessionnelle, plus statistique que liturgique, sans cesser d’organiser profondément les conditions d’existence. +Sous cet angle, cette sous-section occupe une position stratégique dans +l'économie générale du chapitre. En amont, les sociétés disciplinaires +et totalitaires avaient porté à un haut degré de visibilité la +verticalité du commandement, la saturation idéologique ou +l'objectivation des conduites. En aval, les régimes cybernétiques et +numériques déplaceront encore la norme vers l'adaptation continue, la +captation comportementale et l'automatisation partielle des régulations. +La configuration providentielle ne se confond avec aucun de ces deux +pôles. Elle forme un moment propre, dans lequel la régulation devient +plus enveloppante que spectaculaire, plus procédurale que +confessionnelle, plus statistique que liturgique, sans cesser +d'organiser profondément les conditions d'existence. -L’hypothèse directrice sera donc la suivante : les démocraties providentielles redéploient l’archicratie en transformant l’obéissance directe en inclusion conditionnelle. Les individus y sont moins sommés de se déclarer fidèles à une vérité d’État que pris dans des dispositifs qui les protègent tout en les classant, les accompagnent tout en les évaluant, les assurent tout en les rendant comparables. Le citoyen y devient porteur d’un ensemble de statuts — ayant droit, usager, cotisant, bénéficiaire, patient ou demandeur — qui ouvrent des prises en charge collectives réelles, mais sous conditions de résidence, d’activité, d’éligibilité ou de conformité procédurale. La co-viabilité s’y soutient par un compromis dynamique entre universalité proclamée et différenciation administrée. +L'hypothèse directrice sera donc la suivante : les démocraties +providentielles redéploient l'archicratie en transformant l'obéissance +directe en inclusion conditionnelle. Les individus y sont moins sommés +de se déclarer fidèles à une vérité d'État que pris dans des dispositifs +qui les protègent tout en les classant, les accompagnent tout en les +évaluant, les assurent tout en les rendant comparables. Le citoyen y +devient porteur d'un ensemble de statuts — ayant droit, usager, +cotisant, bénéficiaire, patient ou demandeur — qui ouvrent des prises +en charge collectives réelles, mais sous conditions de résidence, +d'activité, d'éligibilité ou de conformité procédurale. La co-viabilité +s'y soutient par un compromis dynamique entre universalité proclamée et +différenciation administrée. -Pour décrire ce régime, l’approche archicratique est particulièrement opérante. Elle permet de reconstruire ensemble : une arcalité fondée sur les droits sociaux, la mémoire des catastrophes historiques et la promesse de protection ; une cratialité assurantielle, statistique, bureaucratique et gestionnaire ; une archicration démocratique traversée par ses propres tensions, entre ouverture conflictuelle et ritualisation procédurale, entre contestabilité réelle et canalisation institutionnelle. Le problème n’est donc pas de savoir si ces régimes sont ou non violents, mais de comprendre comment ils gouvernent la vie en la prenant en charge, comment ils organisent l’inclusion en la conditionnant, et comment ils rendent la norme à la fois plus acceptable et plus difficile à saisir comme telle. +Pour décrire ce régime, l'approche archicratique est particulièrement +opérante. Elle permet de reconstruire ensemble : une arcalité fondée sur +les droits sociaux, la mémoire des catastrophes historiques et la +promesse de protection ; une cratialité assurantielle, statistique, +bureaucratique et gestionnaire ; une archicration démocratique traversée +par ses propres tensions, entre ouverture conflictuelle et ritualisation +procédurale, entre contestabilité réelle et canalisation +institutionnelle. Le problème n'est donc pas de savoir si ces régimes +sont ou non violents, mais de comprendre comment ils gouvernent la vie +en la prenant en charge, comment ils organisent l'inclusion en la +conditionnant, et comment ils rendent la norme à la fois plus acceptable +et plus difficile à saisir comme telle. -L’arcalité propre au régime démocratique providentiel ne se concentre ni dans une source transcendante unique, ni dans une incarnation charismatique du pouvoir. Elle procède d’un montage plus composite, mais non moins structurant : souveraineté populaire, droits fondamentaux, droits sociaux, mémoire politique des catastrophes du XXe siècle et promesse institutionnelle de protection y composent ensemble une scène de légitimation à la fois pluralisée et robuste. Le fondement ne s’y donne plus comme origine indiscutable ; il se présente comme principe politiquement institué, juridiquement formulé et historiquement justifié. +L'arcalité propre au régime démocratique providentiel ne se concentre ni +dans une source transcendante unique, ni dans une incarnation +charismatique du pouvoir. Elle procède d'un montage plus composite, mais +non moins structurant : souveraineté populaire, droits fondamentaux, +droits sociaux, mémoire politique des catastrophes du XXe siècle et +promesse institutionnelle de protection y composent ensemble une scène +de légitimation à la fois pluralisée et robuste. Le fondement ne s'y +donne plus comme origine indiscutable ; il se présente comme principe +politiquement institué, juridiquement formulé et historiquement +justifié. -Cette arcalité tient d’abord à la souveraineté populaire telle qu’elle s’inscrit dans la constitution, dans la périodicité électorale et dans la reconnaissance du citoyen comme sujet de droit. Mais elle ne s’y réduit pas. L’un des traits décisifs du régime d’après-guerre est d’avoir incorporé à cette scène fondatrice une promesse de sécurité sociale, de protection contre les risques de l’existence et de limitation politique de la vulnérabilité. Le travail, la maladie, la vieillesse, l’enfance, l’accident, le chômage cessent d’apparaître comme simples aléas privés ; ils deviennent des objets de prise en charge collective. En ce sens, l’État social ne s’ajoute pas extérieurement à la démocratie représentative : il en transforme la texture arcale en élargissant la légitimité politique à la protection matérielle des existences. +Cette arcalité tient d'abord à la souveraineté populaire telle qu'elle +s'inscrit dans la constitution, dans la périodicité électorale et dans +la reconnaissance du citoyen comme sujet de droit. Mais elle ne s'y +réduit pas. L'un des traits décisifs du régime d'après-guerre est +d'avoir incorporé à cette scène fondatrice une promesse de sécurité +sociale, de protection contre les risques de l'existence et de +limitation politique de la vulnérabilité. Le travail, la maladie, la +vieillesse, l'enfance, l'accident, le chômage cessent d'apparaître comme +simples aléas privés ; ils deviennent des objets de prise en charge +collective. En ce sens, l'État social ne s'ajoute pas extérieurement à +la démocratie représentative : il en transforme la texture arcale en +élargissant la légitimité politique à la protection matérielle des +existences. -Cette extension du fondement s’appuie sur des matérialités précises : constitutions, préambules, grandes lois sociales, ordonnances fondatrices, chartes de droits, missions du service public. Il ne s’agit pas là d’un simple décor normatif. Ces textes et ces institutions rendent opposable un engagement de la collectivité envers ses membres ; ils stabilisent une grammaire de justification à partir de laquelle peuvent être invoqués l’accès aux soins, à l’éducation, au revenu de remplacement, à la retraite, à l’assistance ou au logement. L’arcalité démocratique providentielle est donc à la fois civique et sociale : elle fonde l’ordre en promettant non seulement la participation à la cité, mais aussi une certaine protection contre l’exposition brute aux risques. +Cette extension du fondement s'appuie sur des matérialités précises : +constitutions, préambules, grandes lois sociales, ordonnances +fondatrices, chartes de droits, missions du service public. Il ne s'agit +pas là d'un simple décor normatif. Ces textes et ces institutions +rendent opposable un engagement de la collectivité envers ses membres ; +ils stabilisent une grammaire de justification à partir de laquelle +peuvent être invoqués l'accès aux soins, à l'éducation, au revenu de +remplacement, à la retraite, à l'assistance ou au logement. L'arcalité +démocratique providentielle est donc à la fois civique et sociale : elle +fonde l'ordre en promettant non seulement la participation à la cité, +mais aussi une certaine protection contre l'exposition brute aux +risques. -Cette scène de légitimation est inséparable d’une mémoire historique déterminée. Les démocraties providentielles se construisent aussi sur le refus des effondrements antérieurs : misère de masse, désaffiliation, guerre, fascisme, destruction industrielle des vies. Leur arcalité demeure travaillée par cette mémoire négative. Si les droits sociaux acquièrent une telle centralité, ce n’est pas seulement par générosité doctrinale ; c’est parce qu’ils apparaissent comme l’un des moyens d’empêcher le retour de formes de décomposition sociale et politique tenues pour historiquement catastrophiques. Le fondement démocratique ne repose donc pas seulement sur un idéal abstrait d’égalité, mais sur une leçon historique : une société livrée à certaines vulnérabilités massives se rend elle-même politiquement friable. +Cette scène de légitimation est inséparable d'une mémoire historique +déterminée. Les démocraties providentielles se construisent aussi sur le +refus des effondrements antérieurs : misère de masse, désaffiliation, +guerre, fascisme, destruction industrielle des vies. Leur arcalité +demeure travaillée par cette mémoire négative. Si les droits sociaux +acquièrent une telle centralité, ce n'est pas seulement par générosité +doctrinale ; c'est parce qu'ils apparaissent comme l'un des moyens +d'empêcher le retour de formes de décomposition sociale et politique +tenues pour historiquement catastrophiques. Le fondement démocratique ne +repose donc pas seulement sur un idéal abstrait d'égalité, mais sur une +leçon historique : une société livrée à certaines vulnérabilités +massives se rend elle-même politiquement friable. -À cette première couche symbolique s’ajoute progressivement une seconde, plus technicienne. L’arcalité ne se contente plus d’énoncer des principes ; elle tend à se reformuler dans une langue de l’équilibre, de la rationalisation, de la soutenabilité et de l’optimisation. Le régime ne se légitime plus seulement par la justice qu’il promet, mais par sa capacité à démontrer qu’il administre convenablement les interdépendances sociales. D’où le rôle croissant des indicateurs, des taux de couverture, des seuils de pauvreté, des courbes démographiques, des projections de dépenses, des statistiques sanitaires ou éducatives. Ces chiffres ne valent pas simplement comme outils descriptifs ; ils deviennent modalités de preuve. Ils servent à montrer qu’un arbitrage est nécessaire, qu’une réforme est soutenable, qu’une politique est équilibrée, qu’une prestation est trop coûteuse ou insuffisamment ciblée. +À cette première couche symbolique s'ajoute progressivement une seconde, +plus technicienne. L'arcalité ne se contente plus d'énoncer des +principes ; elle tend à se reformuler dans une langue de l'équilibre, de +la rationalisation, de la soutenabilité et de l'optimisation. Le régime +ne se légitime plus seulement par la justice qu'il promet, mais par sa +capacité à démontrer qu'il administre convenablement les +interdépendances sociales. D'où le rôle croissant des indicateurs, des +taux de couverture, des seuils de pauvreté, des courbes démographiques, +des projections de dépenses, des statistiques sanitaires ou éducatives. +Ces chiffres ne valent pas simplement comme outils descriptifs ; ils +deviennent modalités de preuve. Ils servent à montrer qu'un arbitrage +est nécessaire, qu'une réforme est soutenable, qu'une politique est +équilibrée, qu'une prestation est trop coûteuse ou insuffisamment +ciblée. -Il faut toutefois être précis : cette optimisation demeure encore largement analogique. Elle repose sur des agrégats, sur des séries, sur des projections, sur des instruments statistiques interprétés et disputés dans des arènes humaines. Elle n’implique pas encore la modulation automatisée en temps réel, ni l’ajustement normatif continu propre aux régimes cybernétiques ultérieurs. C’est là un point décisif. Le régime démocratique providentiel gouverne déjà par le calcul, mais par un calcul médiatisé par des institutions, des délibérations, des procédures de réforme et des controverses publiques encore saisissables politiquement. +Il faut toutefois être précis : cette optimisation demeure encore +largement analogique. Elle repose sur des agrégats, sur des séries, sur +des projections, sur des instruments statistiques interprétés et +disputés dans des arènes humaines. Elle n'implique pas encore la +modulation automatisée en temps réel, ni l'ajustement normatif continu +propre aux régimes cybernétiques ultérieurs. C'est là un point décisif. +Le régime démocratique providentiel gouverne déjà par le calcul, mais +par un calcul médiatisé par des institutions, des délibérations, des +procédures de réforme et des controverses publiques encore saisissables +politiquement. -L’arcalité démocratique providentielle doit donc être comprise comme une légitimité à la fois juridique, sociale, historique et gestionnaire. Juridique, parce qu’elle s’adosse à des droits formulés et à des garanties reconnues ; sociale, parce qu’elle promet une protection concrète contre les vulnérabilités ordinaires ; historique, parce qu’elle tire une part de sa force du souvenir des catastrophes antérieures ; gestionnaire enfin, parce qu’elle tend à prouver sa validité par la capacité à équilibrer, répartir et optimiser les conditions de la tenue du monde social. C’est cette composition, à la fois forte et instable, qui donne au régime sa singularité : il ne fonde pas seulement l’ordre sur la représentation, mais sur la promesse que l’existence collective peut être rendue plus vivable à travers des protections organisées, calculées et politiquement justifiables. +L'arcalité démocratique providentielle doit donc être comprise comme une +légitimité à la fois juridique, sociale, historique et gestionnaire. +Juridique, parce qu'elle s'adosse à des droits formulés et à des +garanties reconnues ; sociale, parce qu'elle promet une protection +concrète contre les vulnérabilités ordinaires ; historique, parce +qu'elle tire une part de sa force du souvenir des catastrophes +antérieures ; gestionnaire enfin, parce qu'elle tend à prouver sa +validité par la capacité à équilibrer, répartir et optimiser les +conditions de la tenue du monde social. C'est cette composition, à la +fois forte et instable, qui donne au régime sa singularité : il ne fonde +pas seulement l'ordre sur la représentation, mais sur la promesse que +l'existence collective peut être rendue plus vivable à travers des +protections organisées, calculées et politiquement justifiables. -La cratialité propre au régime démocratique providentiel ne vise ni l’obéissance exaltée ni la mobilisation totale. Elle opère sur un autre mode : celui d’une gestion différenciée des conditions d’existence. Le pouvoir s’y exerce moins sur des sujets héroïsés ou désignés comme ennemis que sur des populations distribuées en catégories, en trajectoires, en profils de risque, en situations d’activité ou de vulnérabilité. Il ne commande pas d’abord ; il classe, ouvre des droits, en suspend d’autres, ajuste des prestations, organise des parcours, anticipe des charges, répartit des protections. +La cratialité propre au régime démocratique providentiel ne vise ni +l'obéissance exaltée ni la mobilisation totale. Elle opère sur un autre +mode : celui d'une gestion différenciée des conditions d'existence. Le +pouvoir s'y exerce moins sur des sujets héroïsés ou désignés comme +ennemis que sur des populations distribuées en catégories, en +trajectoires, en profils de risque, en situations d'activité ou de +vulnérabilité. Il ne commande pas d'abord ; il classe, ouvre des droits, +en suspend d'autres, ajuste des prestations, organise des parcours, +anticipe des charges, répartit des protections. -Cette cratialité s’appuie d’abord sur la statistique publique. Celle-ci ne se borne pas à décrire la société ; elle contribue à la rendre gouvernable. Les taux d’emploi, les courbes démographiques, les données sanitaires, les seuils de pauvreté, les cartes d’équipement ou les indicateurs de besoins localisent des problèmes, hiérarchisent des urgences et légitiment des arbitrages. La donnée agrégée fonctionne ainsi comme opérateur de qualification collective : elle permet de dire où intervenir, sur qui concentrer les moyens, quels groupes protéger davantage, quels déséquilibres corriger, quelles dépenses contenir. La population devient lisible sous forme de séries, et cette lisibilité prépare l’intervention. +Cette cratialité s'appuie d'abord sur la statistique publique. Celle-ci +ne se borne pas à décrire la société ; elle contribue à la rendre +gouvernable. Les taux d'emploi, les courbes démographiques, les données +sanitaires, les seuils de pauvreté, les cartes d'équipement ou les +indicateurs de besoins localisent des problèmes, hiérarchisent des +urgences et légitiment des arbitrages. La donnée agrégée fonctionne +ainsi comme opérateur de qualification collective : elle permet de dire +où intervenir, sur qui concentrer les moyens, quels groupes protéger +davantage, quels déséquilibres corriger, quelles dépenses contenir. La +population devient lisible sous forme de séries, et cette lisibilité +prépare l'intervention. -Mais cette première prise, macroscopique, ne suffirait pas sans une seconde : la bureaucratie procédurale. Car le régime providentiel ne gouverne pas seulement par grandes catégories statistiques ; il gouverne aussi en traduisant les existences singulières dans des chaînes de traitement administratives. Dossiers, formulaires, attestations, justificatifs, rapports, examens, validations, recours : tout un appareillage transforme les situations vécues en cas instruits. Le pouvoir ne prend alors plus la forme d’un ordre direct, mais celle d’une suite d’opérations qui rendent la vie administrativement traitable. Être malade, chômeur, parent isolé, retraité, étudiant, demandeur d’aide ou locataire en difficulté, ce n’est pas seulement éprouver une situation ; c’est entrer dans un langage de procédures où cette situation devra être prouvée, codée, évaluée, reconnue ou refusée. +Mais cette première prise, macroscopique, ne suffirait pas sans une +seconde : la bureaucratie procédurale. Car le régime providentiel ne +gouverne pas seulement par grandes catégories statistiques ; il gouverne +aussi en traduisant les existences singulières dans des chaînes de +traitement administratives. Dossiers, formulaires, attestations, +justificatifs, rapports, examens, validations, recours : tout un +appareillage transforme les situations vécues en cas instruits. Le +pouvoir ne prend alors plus la forme d'un ordre direct, mais celle d'une +suite d'opérations qui rendent la vie administrativement traitable. Être +malade, chômeur, parent isolé, retraité, étudiant, demandeur d'aide ou +locataire en difficulté, ce n'est pas seulement éprouver une situation ; +c'est entrer dans un langage de procédures où cette situation devra être +prouvée, codée, évaluée, reconnue ou refusée. -Le troisième ressort est celui de l’éligibilité conditionnelle. C’est ici que la cratialité providentielle révèle le plus clairement son ambivalence. Car la protection n’y est jamais pure gratuité ; elle suppose presque toujours des seuils, des critères, des statuts, des temporalités, des preuves d’appartenance ou de conformité. On n’accède pas aux ressources simplement parce qu’on existe, mais parce qu’on entre dans certaines catégories recevables : résidence stable, carrière suffisamment déclarée, cotisation antérieure, situation familiale reconnue, incapacité certifiée, comportement administratif jugé adéquat. Le régime inclut, mais en qualifiant. Il ouvre, mais sous conditions. Il protège, mais en distinguant. +Le troisième ressort est celui de l'éligibilité conditionnelle. C'est +ici que la cratialité providentielle révèle le plus clairement son +ambivalence. Car la protection n'y est jamais pure gratuité ; elle +suppose presque toujours des seuils, des critères, des statuts, des +temporalités, des preuves d'appartenance ou de conformité. On n'accède +pas aux ressources simplement parce qu'on existe, mais parce qu'on entre +dans certaines catégories recevables : résidence stable, carrière +suffisamment déclarée, cotisation antérieure, situation familiale +reconnue, incapacité certifiée, comportement administratif jugé adéquat. +Le régime inclut, mais en qualifiant. Il ouvre, mais sous conditions. Il +protège, mais en distinguant. -De là vient sa puissance propre. Cette cratialité n’a pas besoin de se présenter comme violence manifeste pour produire des effets profonds. Elle pèse sur les comportements ordinaires en distribuant silencieusement les conditions d’accès aux protections. Travailler, se déclarer, se soigner dans les cadres requis, scolariser ses enfants, résider de manière stabilisée, répondre aux convocations, fournir les pièces demandées : autant de conduites qui ne relèvent pas d’un commandement central spectaculaire, mais d’une multiplicité d’obligations diffuses dont dépend l’effectivité même des droits. La norme ne s’impose pas ici sous forme de credo ; elle se glisse dans les procédures par lesquelles l’inclusion devient praticable ou s’interrompt. +De là vient sa puissance propre. Cette cratialité n'a pas besoin de se +présenter comme violence manifeste pour produire des effets profonds. +Elle pèse sur les comportements ordinaires en distribuant +silencieusement les conditions d'accès aux protections. Travailler, se +déclarer, se soigner dans les cadres requis, scolariser ses enfants, +résider de manière stabilisée, répondre aux convocations, fournir les +pièces demandées : autant de conduites qui ne relèvent pas d'un +commandement central spectaculaire, mais d'une multiplicité +d'obligations diffuses dont dépend l'effectivité même des droits. La +norme ne s'impose pas ici sous forme de credo ; elle se glisse dans les +procédures par lesquelles l'inclusion devient praticable ou +s'interrompt. -Il faut toutefois éviter un contresens. Cette rationalité de classement, de preuve et de conditionnalité n’est pas encore celle des régimes cybernétiques. Elle demeure massivement analogique, hiérarchique et médiée par des institutions humaines. Les indicateurs y servent à préparer et à justifier des décisions ; ils ne modulent pas encore automatiquement les droits en temps réel. Les fichiers soutiennent l’administration ; ils ne constituent pas encore des nœuds autonomes d’ajustement comportemental continu. Le régime providentiel gouverne déjà par le calcul, mais par un calcul lent, procédural, interprété, encore enchâssé dans des chaînes bureaucratiques et dans des temporalités de décision politiquement repérables. +Il faut toutefois éviter un contresens. Cette rationalité de classement, +de preuve et de conditionnalité n'est pas encore celle des régimes +cybernétiques. Elle demeure massivement analogique, hiérarchique et +médiée par des institutions humaines. Les indicateurs y servent à +préparer et à justifier des décisions ; ils ne modulent pas encore +automatiquement les droits en temps réel. Les fichiers soutiennent +l'administration ; ils ne constituent pas encore des nœuds autonomes +d'ajustement comportemental continu. Le régime providentiel gouverne +déjà par le calcul, mais par un calcul lent, procédural, interprété, +encore enchâssé dans des chaînes bureaucratiques et dans des +temporalités de décision politiquement repérables. -La cratialité démocratique providentielle peut donc se définir comme une puissance de traduction administrative de la vie sociale. Elle transforme des existences en catégories, des besoins en critères, des vulnérabilités en droits potentiels, des trajectoires en dossiers, des écarts en anomalies traitables. Sa spécificité ne tient pas à l’absence de contrainte, mais au fait que la contrainte y prend la forme d’un encadrement procédural des conditions de protection. C’est en cela qu’elle diffère à la fois de la verticalité totalitaire qui la précède et de l’adaptativité cybernétique qui lui succédera : elle gouverne en assurant, en classant et en conditionnant. +La cratialité démocratique providentielle peut donc se définir comme une +puissance de traduction administrative de la vie sociale. Elle +transforme des existences en catégories, des besoins en critères, des +vulnérabilités en droits potentiels, des trajectoires en dossiers, des +écarts en anomalies traitables. Sa spécificité ne tient pas à l'absence +de contrainte, mais au fait que la contrainte y prend la forme d'un +encadrement procédural des conditions de protection. C'est en cela +qu'elle diffère à la fois de la verticalité totalitaire qui la précède +et de l'adaptativité cybernétique qui lui succédera : elle gouverne en +assurant, en classant et en conditionnant. -L’archicration démocratique providentielle ne se réduit ni à l’invocation abstraite de la souveraineté populaire, ni à la fiction d’une transparence délibérative où la légitimité naîtrait spontanément de la discussion publique. Sa spécificité tient plutôt à l’existence d’un archipel d’arènes dans lesquelles les normes d’inclusion, les critères d’éligibilité, les formes de la protection et les seuils de l’acceptable peuvent être remis en débat, réinterprétés, corrigés ou déplacés. Le régime ne vaut pas seulement par les droits qu’il proclame ni par les procédures qu’il administre, mais par l’existence de scènes où sa propre normativité peut être exposée à l’épreuve. +L'archicration démocratique providentielle ne se réduit ni à +l'invocation abstraite de la souveraineté populaire, ni à la fiction +d'une transparence délibérative où la légitimité naîtrait spontanément +de la discussion publique. Sa spécificité tient plutôt à l'existence +d'un archipel d'arènes dans lesquelles les normes d'inclusion, les +critères d'éligibilité, les formes de la protection et les seuils de +l'acceptable peuvent être remis en débat, réinterprétés, corrigés ou +déplacés. Le régime ne vaut pas seulement par les droits qu'il proclame +ni par les procédures qu'il administre, mais par l'existence de scènes +où sa propre normativité peut être exposée à l'épreuve. -Ces scènes sont de nature diverse, mais il serait inutile de les inventorier longuement. L’essentiel est ailleurs : assemblées délibératives, négociations sociales, juridictions, mobilisations collectives, controverses publiques, associations d’usagers ou de défense des droits forment moins une série d’institutions séparées qu’un ensemble discontinu d’espaces où la norme ne s’applique pas simplement, mais se trouve soumise à contestation, à justification ou à révision. L’archicration démocratique ne réside donc pas dans un lieu unique ; elle circule entre plusieurs arènes, avec des intensités variables, des temporalités disjointes et des degrés très inégaux d’effectivité. +Ces scènes sont de nature diverse, mais il serait inutile de les +inventorier longuement. L'essentiel est ailleurs : assemblées +délibératives, négociations sociales, juridictions, mobilisations +collectives, controverses publiques, associations d'usagers ou de +défense des droits forment moins une série d'institutions séparées qu'un +ensemble discontinu d'espaces où la norme ne s'applique pas simplement, +mais se trouve soumise à contestation, à justification ou à révision. +L'archicration démocratique ne réside donc pas dans un lieu unique ; +elle circule entre plusieurs arènes, avec des intensités variables, des +temporalités disjointes et des degrés très inégaux d'effectivité. -Dans sa forme la plus forte, cette archicration permet une véritable mise à l’épreuve du régime par ses propres destinataires. Une loi sociale peut être amendée, une décision administrative contestée, un critère d’accès rediscuté, une catégorie disqualifiante renversée, une politique hospitalière ou scolaire réévaluée sous l’effet conjugué du conflit, de la jurisprudence, de la mobilisation ou de l’argumentation publique. En ce sens, la démocratie providentielle ne vit pas seulement d’un équilibre institutionnel ; elle dépend de sa capacité à laisser subsister des scènes où les normes de co-viabilité puissent être disputées sans que le conflit soit immédiatement traité comme menace extérieure. +Dans sa forme la plus forte, cette archicration permet une véritable +mise à l'épreuve du régime par ses propres destinataires. Une loi +sociale peut être amendée, une décision administrative contestée, un +critère d'accès rediscuté, une catégorie disqualifiante renversée, une +politique hospitalière ou scolaire réévaluée sous l'effet conjugué du +conflit, de la jurisprudence, de la mobilisation ou de l'argumentation +publique. En ce sens, la démocratie providentielle ne vit pas seulement +d'un équilibre institutionnel ; elle dépend de sa capacité à laisser +subsister des scènes où les normes de co-viabilité puissent être +disputées sans que le conflit soit immédiatement traité comme menace +extérieure. -Mais cette ouverture n’est jamais pure. C’est même ici que réside l’ambivalence constitutive du régime. Les mêmes scènes qui permettent l’exposition critique de la norme peuvent aussi fonctionner comme dispositifs de canalisation. Le débat parlementaire peut ritualiser des arbitrages déjà verrouillés ; la concertation sociale peut encadrer le dissensus dans des temporalités et des formats qui en limitent la portée ; le recours juridictionnel peut individualiser des problèmes structurels ; la consultation publique peut offrir l’image d’une participation sans déplacer réellement les cadres de décision ; la controverse médiatique peut simplifier à l’excès ce qu’elle prétend mettre en discussion. L’archicration, ici, oscille sans cesse entre réouverture effective et mise en scène régulée de l’ouverture. +Mais cette ouverture n'est jamais pure. C'est même ici que réside +l'ambivalence constitutive du régime. Les mêmes scènes qui permettent +l'exposition critique de la norme peuvent aussi fonctionner comme +dispositifs de canalisation. Le débat parlementaire peut ritualiser des +arbitrages déjà verrouillés ; la concertation sociale peut encadrer le +dissensus dans des temporalités et des formats qui en limitent la portée +; le recours juridictionnel peut individualiser des problèmes +structurels ; la consultation publique peut offrir l'image d'une +participation sans déplacer réellement les cadres de décision ; la +controverse médiatique peut simplifier à l'excès ce qu'elle prétend +mettre en discussion. L'archicration, ici, oscille sans cesse entre +réouverture effective et mise en scène régulée de l'ouverture. -C’est pourquoi il faut résister à deux illusions contraires. La première consisterait à idéaliser ces arènes comme lieux naturels d’auto-correction démocratique. La seconde serait de n’y voir que théâtre d’impuissance. L’une et l’autre manqueraient le cœur du problème. L’archicration démocratique providentielle est une structure ambivalente : elle ouvre réellement des possibilités de contestation, de révision et de requalification, mais elle le fait dans des cadres procéduraux qui tendent en même temps à absorber, filtrer, temporiser et reformater cette conflictualité. +C'est pourquoi il faut résister à deux illusions contraires. La première +consisterait à idéaliser ces arènes comme lieux naturels +d'auto-correction démocratique. La seconde serait de n'y voir que +théâtre d'impuissance. L'une et l'autre manqueraient le cœur du +problème. L'archicration démocratique providentielle est une structure +ambivalente : elle ouvre réellement des possibilités de contestation, de +révision et de requalification, mais elle le fait dans des cadres +procéduraux qui tendent en même temps à absorber, filtrer, temporiser et +reformater cette conflictualité. -Cette tension est constitutive, non accidentelle. Elle appartient à la logique même du régime. Car la démocratie providentielle doit à la fois protéger l’ordre de la co-viabilité et maintenir des scènes où cet ordre puisse être discuté au nom de ses propres principes. Toute fermeture excessive de ces arènes affaiblit sa légitimité ; toute ouverture illimitée mettrait à l’épreuve sa capacité de tenue. L’archicration y apparaît ainsi comme un opérateur de réflexivité fragile : ni simple supplément procédural, ni pure façade de validation, mais ensemble conflictuel de scènes où le régime travaille sans cesse sa propre justification. +Cette tension est constitutive, non accidentelle. Elle appartient à la +logique même du régime. Car la démocratie providentielle doit à la fois +protéger l'ordre de la co-viabilité et maintenir des scènes où cet ordre +puisse être discuté au nom de ses propres principes. Toute fermeture +excessive de ces arènes affaiblit sa légitimité ; toute ouverture +illimitée mettrait à l'épreuve sa capacité de tenue. L'archicration y +apparaît ainsi comme un opérateur de réflexivité fragile : ni simple +supplément procédural, ni pure façade de validation, mais ensemble +conflictuel de scènes où le régime travaille sans cesse sa propre +justification. -La consistance du régime démocratique providentiel ne se laisse toutefois saisir pleinement qu’au niveau de ses opérateurs concrets, là où la promesse des droits rencontre les procédures qui en règlent l’accès et les scènes locales où leur mise en œuvre peut être discutée. C’est à cette échelle que l’on voit le mieux comment s’articulent, dans la pratique, l’arcalité protectrice du régime, sa cratialité bureaucratique et une archicration toujours partielle, souvent fragile, mais néanmoins décisive. +La consistance du régime démocratique providentiel ne se laisse +toutefois saisir pleinement qu'au niveau de ses opérateurs concrets, là +où la promesse des droits rencontre les procédures qui en règlent +l'accès et les scènes locales où leur mise en œuvre peut être discutée. +C'est à cette échelle que l'on voit le mieux comment s'articulent, dans +la pratique, l'arcalité protectrice du régime, sa cratialité +bureaucratique et une archicration toujours partielle, souvent fragile, +mais néanmoins décisive. -L’école en offre une première figure. Elle est portée par une arcalité forte : égalité républicaine, promesse d’émancipation, droit à l’instruction, formation du citoyen. Mais cette promesse n’existe qu’au travers d’une cratialité très organisée : programmes, évaluations, orientation, classement, filières, hiérarchies scolaires. L’archicration apparaît alors dans les moments où cette prétention égalitaire est confrontée à ses effets réels : conseils de classe, conflits autour de l’orientation, mobilisations contre certaines réformes, débats sur l’évaluation ou sur la reproduction des inégalités. L’école concentre ainsi, dans une forme particulièrement lisible, la tension entre un droit proclamé universellement et des mécanismes de distribution différenciée des trajectoires. +L'école en offre une première figure. Elle est portée par une arcalité +forte : égalité républicaine, promesse d'émancipation, droit à +l'instruction, formation du citoyen. Mais cette promesse n'existe qu'au +travers d'une cratialité très organisée : programmes, évaluations, +orientation, classement, filières, hiérarchies scolaires. L'archicration +apparaît alors dans les moments où cette prétention égalitaire est +confrontée à ses effets réels : conseils de classe, conflits autour de +l'orientation, mobilisations contre certaines réformes, débats sur +l'évaluation ou sur la reproduction des inégalités. L'école concentre +ainsi, dans une forme particulièrement lisible, la tension entre un +droit proclamé universellement et des mécanismes de distribution +différenciée des trajectoires. -Le système de santé présente une structure comparable. Son arcalité réside dans la reconnaissance du soin comme bien commun et dans l’idée qu’une société démocratique ne peut abandonner les corps à leur seule solvabilité. Pourtant, cette promesse passe nécessairement par des chaînes procédurales de tri, de priorisation, de codification et de financement. C’est pourquoi l’archicration s’y loge dans des scènes souvent discrètes, mais cruciales : contentieux de prise en charge, comités d’éthique, mobilisations hospitalières, associations de patients, débats sur les seuils d’accès, les files d’attente, les critères de pertinence ou de rationnement. Là encore, le régime ne se définit pas seulement par ce qu’il garantit, mais par les lieux où la manière même de garantir devient discutable. +Le système de santé présente une structure comparable. Son arcalité +réside dans la reconnaissance du soin comme bien commun et dans l'idée +qu'une société démocratique ne peut abandonner les corps à leur seule +solvabilité. Pourtant, cette promesse passe nécessairement par des +chaînes procédurales de tri, de priorisation, de codification et de +financement. C'est pourquoi l'archicration s'y loge dans des scènes +souvent discrètes, mais cruciales : contentieux de prise en charge, +comités d'éthique, mobilisations hospitalières, associations de +patients, débats sur les seuils d'accès, les files d'attente, les +critères de pertinence ou de rationnement. Là encore, le régime ne se +définit pas seulement par ce qu'il garantit, mais par les lieux où la +manière même de garantir devient discutable. -Les organismes de protection sociale condensent d’une autre manière la logique providentielle. Ils rendent effectif le principe de solidarité, mais seulement en traduisant les situations vécues dans des catégories recevables, documentées, vérifiables. L’intérêt analytique de ces institutions ne réside pas dans leur diversité administrative, mais dans la forme qu’elles imposent au rapport entre individu et protection. Le droit n’y est jamais pure déclaration ; il est sans cesse reconduit par des opérations de qualification. Et c’est précisément là qu’apparaît l’archicration locale : commissions de recours, médiations, contestations d’une radiation, rediscussion d’un statut, mise à l’épreuve d’une décision au regard de la promesse même du régime. +Les organismes de protection sociale condensent d'une autre manière la +logique providentielle. Ils rendent effectif le principe de solidarité, +mais seulement en traduisant les situations vécues dans des catégories +recevables, documentées, vérifiables. L'intérêt analytique de ces +institutions ne réside pas dans leur diversité administrative, mais dans +la forme qu'elles imposent au rapport entre individu et protection. Le +droit n'y est jamais pure déclaration ; il est sans cesse reconduit par +des opérations de qualification. Et c'est précisément là qu'apparaît +l'archicration locale : commissions de recours, médiations, +contestations d'une radiation, rediscussion d'un statut, mise à +l'épreuve d'une décision au regard de la promesse même du régime. -Le logement, enfin, donne à cette articulation une matérialité particulièrement nette. Ici, le droit à habiter ne prend jamais la forme d’une simple proclamation abstraite. Il passe par des critères d’attribution, des listes d’attente, des zonages, des priorités implicites, des choix de relogement, des arbitrages territoriaux. La co-viabilité providentielle s’y révèle dans sa dimension la plus spatiale : une société ne protège pas seulement en distribuant des revenus ou des soins, elle protège aussi en organisant des conditions d’inscription matérielle dans l’espace commun. Mais cette protection est immédiatement traversée par des opérations de tri, par des hiérarchies de situations et par des scènes de contestation locales où se rediscutent les seuils du recevable. +Le logement, enfin, donne à cette articulation une matérialité +particulièrement nette. Ici, le droit à habiter ne prend jamais la forme +d'une simple proclamation abstraite. Il passe par des critères +d'attribution, des listes d'attente, des zonages, des priorités +implicites, des choix de relogement, des arbitrages territoriaux. La +co-viabilité providentielle s'y révèle dans sa dimension la plus +spatiale : une société ne protège pas seulement en distribuant des +revenus ou des soins, elle protège aussi en organisant des conditions +d'inscription matérielle dans l'espace commun. Mais cette protection est +immédiatement traversée par des opérations de tri, par des hiérarchies +de situations et par des scènes de contestation locales où se +rediscutent les seuils du recevable. -À travers ces différents opérateurs, une même structure se laisse reconnaître. Le régime démocratique providentiel ne tient ni par la seule proclamation des droits, ni par la seule efficacité des administrations. Il tient dans l’écart, toujours retravaillé, entre une promesse de protection, les procédures qui la conditionnent et les scènes où cette conditionnalité peut être exposée, discutée ou infléchie. C’est dans cet entrelacement, et non dans chacun des pôles pris isolément, que se joue la réalité archicratique du régime. +À travers ces différents opérateurs, une même structure se laisse +reconnaître. Le régime démocratique providentiel ne tient ni par la +seule proclamation des droits, ni par la seule efficacité des +administrations. Il tient dans l'écart, toujours retravaillé, entre une +promesse de protection, les procédures qui la conditionnent et les +scènes où cette conditionnalité peut être exposée, discutée ou +infléchie. C'est dans cet entrelacement, et non dans chacun des pôles +pris isolément, que se joue la réalité archicratique du régime. -Le régime démocratique providentiel n’est ni homogène ni pacifié. Sa force historique tient même au fait qu’il intègre à son fonctionnement des tensions qui ne sont pas des accidents périphériques, mais la matière même de sa viabilité. La première d’entre elles oppose l’universalité proclamée des droits à la différenciation effective des accès. Ce que le droit formule sous le signe de la généralité, la procédure le recompose sous forme de seuils, de statuts, de conditions et de preuves. L’inclusion n’est jamais pure ; elle est médiée, filtrée, gradée. Le régime tient précisément dans cette contradiction : promettre à tous, distribuer sous conditions. +Le régime démocratique providentiel n'est ni homogène ni pacifié. Sa +force historique tient même au fait qu'il intègre à son fonctionnement +des tensions qui ne sont pas des accidents périphériques, mais la +matière même de sa viabilité. La première d'entre elles oppose +l'universalité proclamée des droits à la différenciation effective des +accès. Ce que le droit formule sous le signe de la généralité, la +procédure le recompose sous forme de seuils, de statuts, de conditions +et de preuves. L'inclusion n'est jamais pure ; elle est médiée, filtrée, +gradée. Le régime tient précisément dans cette contradiction : promettre +à tous, distribuer sous conditions. -Une seconde tension traverse la relation entre protection et responsabilisation. À mesure que les dispositifs se densifient, les bénéficiaires sont de plus en plus reconduits à une logique de comportement attendu : se déclarer, coopérer, chercher activement, se conformer, prouver sa bonne foi, démontrer sa disponibilité ou sa discipline thérapeutique. La solidarité change alors de ton. Elle demeure bien réelle, mais elle tend à se doubler d’une épreuve de conformité. Le protégé devient justiciable de sa propre protection. +Une seconde tension traverse la relation entre protection et +responsabilisation. À mesure que les dispositifs se densifient, les +bénéficiaires sont de plus en plus reconduits à une logique de +comportement attendu : se déclarer, coopérer, chercher activement, se +conformer, prouver sa bonne foi, démontrer sa disponibilité ou sa +discipline thérapeutique. La solidarité change alors de ton. Elle +demeure bien réelle, mais elle tend à se doubler d'une épreuve de +conformité. Le protégé devient justiciable de sa propre protection. -À cela s’ajoute une tension plus profonde encore, entre égalité formelle et reproduction des asymétries concrètes. Le régime providentiel corrige, redistribue, amortit ; mais il ne neutralise jamais entièrement les inégalités de classe, de genre, d’origine, de statut administratif ou de capital scolaire. Ses procédures standardisées, précisément parce qu’elles visent l’universalité abstraite, tendent aussi à reconduire des différences structurelles qu’elles ne savent pas toujours nommer. C’est pourquoi la co-viabilité démocratique providentialiste demeure travaillée par ce qu’elle ne parvient qu’imparfaitement à absorber. +À cela s'ajoute une tension plus profonde encore, entre égalité formelle +et reproduction des asymétries concrètes. Le régime providentiel +corrige, redistribue, amortit ; mais il ne neutralise jamais entièrement +les inégalités de classe, de genre, d'origine, de statut administratif +ou de capital scolaire. Ses procédures standardisées, précisément parce +qu'elles visent l'universalité abstraite, tendent aussi à reconduire des +différences structurelles qu'elles ne savent pas toujours nommer. C'est +pourquoi la co-viabilité démocratique providentialiste demeure +travaillée par ce qu'elle ne parvient qu'imparfaitement à absorber. -Ces tensions internes se compliquent d’hybridations externes. La plus visible est l’hybridation marchande : assurances complémentaires, délégations de service, externalisations, critères de rentabilité, sélectivité croissante de certaines protections. La promesse de solidarité subsiste, mais elle se trouve partiellement relayée par des opérateurs qui injectent dans la co-viabilité des logiques d’optimisation, de concurrence ou de solvabilité. Une autre hybridation, plus discrète mais non moins décisive, est d’ordre sécuritaire : contrôle renforcé de la fraude, circulation inter-administrative de l’information, soupçon porté sur certains bénéficiaires, glissement de la protection vers la vérification. Le régime providentiel ne devient pas pour autant policier au sens fort ; mais ses dispositifs peuvent être infléchis vers des fonctions de tri et de surveillance qui en modifient l’esprit. +Ces tensions internes se compliquent d'hybridations externes. La plus +visible est l'hybridation marchande : assurances complémentaires, +délégations de service, externalisations, critères de rentabilité, +sélectivité croissante de certaines protections. La promesse de +solidarité subsiste, mais elle se trouve partiellement relayée par des +opérateurs qui injectent dans la co-viabilité des logiques +d'optimisation, de concurrence ou de solvabilité. Une autre hybridation, +plus discrète mais non moins décisive, est d'ordre sécuritaire : +contrôle renforcé de la fraude, circulation inter-administrative de +l'information, soupçon porté sur certains bénéficiaires, glissement de +la protection vers la vérification. Le régime providentiel ne devient +pas pour autant policier au sens fort ; mais ses dispositifs peuvent +être infléchis vers des fonctions de tri et de surveillance qui en +modifient l'esprit. -Face à ces tensions et à ces hybridations, des résistances persistent. Elles ne prennent pas toujours la forme spectaculaire du grand conflit social. Elles peuvent surgir dans des recours, des médiations, des associations d’usagers, des mobilisations sectorielles, des syndicats, des collectifs de patients, des luttes pour le logement, ou même dans des pratiques plus discrètes de contournement, d’entraide et de réappropriation. Leur intérêt n’est pas seulement protestataire. Elles rappellent que l’archicration démocratique ne disparaît pas dès lors que les procédures se rigidifient ; elle se déplace, se fragilise, se recompose dans des scènes souvent locales, parfois précaires, mais capables encore d’exposer la norme à ses propres promesses. +Face à ces tensions et à ces hybridations, des résistances persistent. +Elles ne prennent pas toujours la forme spectaculaire du grand conflit +social. Elles peuvent surgir dans des recours, des médiations, des +associations d'usagers, des mobilisations sectorielles, des syndicats, +des collectifs de patients, des luttes pour le logement, ou même dans +des pratiques plus discrètes de contournement, d'entraide et de +réappropriation. Leur intérêt n'est pas seulement protestataire. Elles +rappellent que l'archicration démocratique ne disparaît pas dès lors que +les procédures se rigidifient ; elle se déplace, se fragilise, se +recompose dans des scènes souvent locales, parfois précaires, mais +capables encore d'exposer la norme à ses propres promesses. -C’est aussi par là qu’apparaissent les cas limites du régime : celles et ceux qu’il ne parvient ni à intégrer pleinement, ni à exclure complètement. Sans-papiers, sans-domicile, travailleurs intermittents de l’informel, jeunes en errance, personnes en suspens administratif ou social : ces figures ne sont pas extérieures à la démocratie providentielle, elles en révèlent les bords. Elles montrent ce qu’un régime fondé sur la protection conditionnelle laisse en reste lorsqu’aucune catégorie ne parvient plus à stabiliser l’accès aux droits. Le cas limite n’est pas une anomalie secondaire ; il est l’épreuve concrète des seuils de recevabilité du système. +C'est aussi par là qu'apparaissent les cas limites du régime : celles et +ceux qu'il ne parvient ni à intégrer pleinement, ni à exclure +complètement. Sans-papiers, sans-domicile, travailleurs intermittents de +l'informel, jeunes en errance, personnes en suspens administratif ou +social : ces figures ne sont pas extérieures à la démocratie +providentielle, elles en révèlent les bords. Elles montrent ce qu'un +régime fondé sur la protection conditionnelle laisse en reste +lorsqu'aucune catégorie ne parvient plus à stabiliser l'accès aux +droits. Le cas limite n'est pas une anomalie secondaire ; il est +l'épreuve concrète des seuils de recevabilité du système. -Il faut enfin noter, sans surcharger la démonstration, qu’une inflexion s’esquisse dans les dernières décennies du XXe siècle. La montée des indicateurs de performance, des tableaux de bord et des logiques d’évaluation prépare un déplacement de grande portée. Nous ne sommes pas encore dans le régime cybernétique proprement dit : la décision demeure médiée par des institutions, les données restent agrégées, les temporalités de traitement restent relativement lentes, la norme continue de passer par des procédures humaines identifiables. Mais quelque chose se prépare déjà : une translation de la légitimité depuis la protection et la délibération vers la performance, le pilotage et l’ajustement. +Il faut enfin noter, sans surcharger la démonstration, qu'une inflexion +s'esquisse dans les dernières décennies du XXe siècle. La montée des +indicateurs de performance, des tableaux de bord et des logiques +d'évaluation prépare un déplacement de grande portée. Nous ne sommes pas +encore dans le régime cybernétique proprement dit : la décision demeure +médiée par des institutions, les données restent agrégées, les +temporalités de traitement restent relativement lentes, la norme +continue de passer par des procédures humaines identifiables. Mais +quelque chose se prépare déjà : une translation de la légitimité depuis +la protection et la délibération vers la performance, le pilotage et +l'ajustement. -Le régime démocratique providentiel apparaît ainsi comme une configuration archicratique de très haute densité. Il ne se réduit ni à un compromis transitoire ni à une simple version modérée de la domination moderne. Sa singularité tient à l’articulation d’une arcalité fondée sur les droits sociaux et la souveraineté populaire, d’une cratialité assurantielle et bureaucratique appliquée aux trajectoires de vie, et d’une archicration pluralisée, dispersée dans un archipel d’arènes où les normes peuvent encore être exposées, disputées, parfois infléchies. +Le régime démocratique providentiel apparaît ainsi comme une +configuration archicratique de très haute densité. Il ne se réduit ni à +un compromis transitoire ni à une simple version modérée de la +domination moderne. Sa singularité tient à l'articulation d'une arcalité +fondée sur les droits sociaux et la souveraineté populaire, d'une +cratialité assurantielle et bureaucratique appliquée aux trajectoires de +vie, et d'une archicration pluralisée, dispersée dans un archipel +d'arènes où les normes peuvent encore être exposées, disputées, parfois +infléchies. -Mais cette force fut aussi sa fragilité. Plus le régime a cherché à stabiliser la co-viabilité par la procédure, la catégorisation et l’équilibre gestionnaire, plus il s’est exposé à l’épuisement de ses médiations et à la remise en question de ses formes de légitimité. +Mais cette force fut aussi sa fragilité. Plus le régime a cherché à +stabiliser la co-viabilité par la procédure, la catégorisation et +l'équilibre gestionnaire, plus il s'est exposé à l'épuisement de ses +médiations et à la remise en question de ses formes de légitimité. -Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les traits fondamentaux de cette configuration. La sous-section suivante examinera non pas un simple prolongement technique de ce régime, mais une transformation plus profonde : le passage à des formes de régulation où la norme cesse de se présenter d’abord comme droit opposable, procédure contestable ou arbitrage visible, pour se dissoudre davantage dans des infrastructures de calcul, de captation et d’ajustement continu. +Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les traits +fondamentaux de cette configuration. La sous-section suivante examinera +non pas un simple prolongement technique de ce régime, mais une +transformation plus profonde : le passage à des formes de régulation où +la norme cesse de se présenter d'abord comme droit opposable, procédure +contestable ou arbitrage visible, pour se dissoudre davantage dans des +infrastructures de calcul, de captation et d'ajustement continu. ### 2.3.7 — Régimes cybernétiques, adaptatifs et numériques -Les régimes cybernétiques, adaptatifs et numériques ne constituent ni un simple prolongement des formes bureaucratiques modernes, ni une radicalisation des dispositifs disciplinaires antérieurs. Ils introduisent une transformation plus profonde : un déplacement du principe même de régulation. Là où les régimes précédents organisaient l’ordre à partir de normes explicites, de décisions localisables ou de structures institutionnelles identifiables, le régime cybernético-calculatoire opère à partir de la modélisation des comportements, de l’anticipation probabiliste et de l’ajustement continu des environnements d’action. +Les régimes cybernétiques, adaptatifs et numériques ne constituent ni un +simple prolongement des formes bureaucratiques modernes, ni une +radicalisation des dispositifs disciplinaires antérieurs. Ils +introduisent une transformation plus profonde : un déplacement du +principe même de régulation. Là où les régimes précédents organisaient +l'ordre à partir de normes explicites, de décisions localisables ou de +structures institutionnelles identifiables, le régime +cybernético-calculatoire opère à partir de la modélisation des +comportements, de l'anticipation probabiliste et de l'ajustement continu +des environnements d'action. -Ce déplacement engage une mutation à la fois épistémique et opératoire. Le savoir régulateur cesse d’être principalement juridique, doctrinal ou administratif pour devenir computationnel, statistique et prédictif. Corrélations, profils, signaux faibles et boucles de rétroaction remplacent progressivement les catégories normatives explicites. Dans le même mouvement, le pouvoir perd son caractère immédiatement localisable : il ne se présente plus prioritairement comme commandement, décision ou autorité, mais comme agencement distribué de dispositifs capables de capter, traiter et réorienter les conduites en temps réel. +Ce déplacement engage une mutation à la fois épistémique et opératoire. +Le savoir régulateur cesse d'être principalement juridique, doctrinal ou +administratif pour devenir computationnel, statistique et prédictif. +Corrélations, profils, signaux faibles et boucles de rétroaction +remplacent progressivement les catégories normatives explicites. Dans le +même mouvement, le pouvoir perd son caractère immédiatement localisable +: il ne se présente plus prioritairement comme commandement, décision ou +autorité, mais comme agencement distribué de dispositifs capables de +capter, traiter et réorienter les conduites en temps réel. -La régulation ne s’abolit pas ; elle se reconfigure. Elle procède désormais d’abord par préformation des possibles. L’interdit ou l’obligation n’en constituent plus les vecteurs dominants ; elle passe plutôt par la structuration différentielle des trajectoires d’action. Ce qui est en jeu n’est donc pas un affaiblissement du pouvoir, mais une transformation de ses modalités d’exercice : d’un pouvoir qui ordonne à un pouvoir qui anticipe, d’un pouvoir qui contraint à un pouvoir qui module. +La régulation ne s'abolit pas ; elle se reconfigure. Elle procède +désormais d'abord par préformation des possibles. L'interdit ou +l'obligation n'en constituent plus les vecteurs dominants ; elle passe +plutôt par la structuration différentielle des trajectoires d'action. Ce +qui est en jeu n'est donc pas un affaiblissement du pouvoir, mais une +transformation de ses modalités d'exercice : d'un pouvoir qui ordonne à +un pouvoir qui anticipe, d'un pouvoir qui contraint à un pouvoir qui +module. -Il serait toutefois erroné d’interpréter ce basculement comme l’avènement d’un pilotage purement immatériel ou désincarné. Le régime cybernétique ne substitue pas un espace numérique abstrait aux formes antérieures de gouvernement ; il reconfigure les conditions matérielles, techniques et informationnelles de la régulation. Il ne supprime ni les institutions ni les médiations, mais les recompose à partir d’infrastructures computationnelles qui en redistribuent les fonctions. +Il serait toutefois erroné d'interpréter ce basculement comme +l'avènement d'un pilotage purement immatériel ou désincarné. Le régime +cybernétique ne substitue pas un espace numérique abstrait aux formes +antérieures de gouvernement ; il reconfigure les conditions matérielles, +techniques et informationnelles de la régulation. Il ne supprime ni les +institutions ni les médiations, mais les recompose à partir +d'infrastructures computationnelles qui en redistribuent les fonctions. -Cette sous-section occupe, à ce titre, une position décisive dans l’économie du chapitre. Après les régimes disciplinaires et totalitaires, où la normativité se rendait visible dans des formes de commandement, de surveillance ou de mobilisation, et après les régimes démocratiques providentiels, où elle s’organisait dans des dispositifs assurantiels, statistiques et procéduraux, le régime cybernético-calculatoire introduit une configuration dans laquelle la norme tend à se dissoudre dans l’environnement même de l’action. La régulation ne disparaît pas : elle devient moins immédiatement perceptible comme telle. +Cette sous-section occupe, à ce titre, une position décisive dans +l'économie du chapitre. Après les régimes disciplinaires et +totalitaires, où la normativité se rendait visible dans des formes de +commandement, de surveillance ou de mobilisation, et après les régimes +démocratiques providentiels, où elle s'organisait dans des dispositifs +assurantiels, statistiques et procéduraux, le régime +cybernético-calculatoire introduit une configuration dans laquelle la +norme tend à se dissoudre dans l'environnement même de l'action. La +régulation ne disparaît pas : elle devient moins immédiatement +perceptible comme telle. -L’hypothèse directrice peut dès lors être formulée ainsi : le régime cybernétique redéploie l’archicratie en substituant à la normativité explicite une régulation par anticipation et modulation. Les individus n’y sont plus principalement gouvernés comme sujets de droit, ni même comme bénéficiaires d’agencements techniques, mais comme ensembles de données, profils comportementaux et trajectoires probabilisées. La co-viabilité ne s’y soutient plus prioritairement par la loi, la procédure ou la délibération, mais par l’ajustement continu des conditions d’action à partir de modèles calculatoires. +L'hypothèse directrice peut dès lors être formulée ainsi : le régime +cybernétique redéploie l'archicratie en substituant à la normativité +explicite une régulation par anticipation et modulation. Les individus +n'y sont plus principalement gouvernés comme sujets de droit, ni même +comme bénéficiaires d'agencements techniques, mais comme ensembles de +données, profils comportementaux et trajectoires probabilisées. La +co-viabilité ne s'y soutient plus prioritairement par la loi, la +procédure ou la délibération, mais par l'ajustement continu des +conditions d'action à partir de modèles calculatoires. -Dans cette perspective, l’approche archicratique conserve toute sa pertinence, à condition d’en déplacer les points d’attention. L’arcalité ne disparaît pas, mais se reconfigure dans les architectures techniques et les protocoles ; la cratialité ne s’efface pas, mais se diffuse dans des dispositifs distribués de capture et de traitement ; l’archicration ne s’abolit pas, mais tend à s’opérer en amont de la décision, sous forme d’anticipation intégrée. Ce n’est donc pas la fin du triangle archicratique, mais une mutation de sa géométrie : d’une structuration visible et opposable à une organisation plus diffuse, plus continue et plus difficilement saisissable. +Dans cette perspective, l'approche archicratique conserve toute sa +pertinence, à condition d'en déplacer les points d'attention. L'arcalité +ne disparaît pas, mais se reconfigure dans les architectures techniques +et les protocoles ; la cratialité ne s'efface pas, mais se diffuse dans +des dispositifs distribués de capture et de traitement ; l'archicration +ne s'abolit pas, mais tend à s'opérer en amont de la décision, sous +forme d'anticipation intégrée. Ce n'est donc pas la fin du triangle +archicratique, mais une mutation de sa géométrie : d'une structuration +visible et opposable à une organisation plus diffuse, plus continue et +plus difficilement saisissable. -Cette mutation s’enracine dans une généalogie théorique identifiable, qu’il convient de restituer sans en faire un inventaire. Dès 1948, Norbert Wiener formalise, avec la cybernétique, une conception du gouvernement fondée sur la rétroaction : l’action y est continuellement ajustée à partir des effets qu’elle produit. La régulation ne repose plus principalement sur l’édiction de règles, mais sur la stabilisation dynamique de systèmes par correction continue. Ce déplacement est décisif : il ouvre la possibilité d’un pouvoir opérant par ajustement plutôt que par commandement. +Cette mutation s'enracine dans une généalogie théorique identifiable, +qu'il convient de restituer sans en faire un inventaire. Dès 1948, +Norbert Wiener formalise, avec la cybernétique, une conception du +gouvernement fondée sur la rétroaction : l'action y est continuellement +ajustée à partir des effets qu'elle produit. La régulation ne repose +plus principalement sur l'édiction de règles, mais sur la stabilisation +dynamique de systèmes par correction continue. Ce déplacement est +décisif : il ouvre la possibilité d'un pouvoir opérant par ajustement +plutôt que par commandement. -Sans en proposer une formalisation technique, Michel Foucault en saisit l’inflexion dans ses analyses de la gouvernementalité. Le pouvoir n’y agit plus d’abord en imposant des normes explicites, mais en configurant les conditions dans lesquelles les conduites deviennent possibles. Gouverner consiste alors moins à ordonner qu’à structurer des environnements d’action, à orienter les comportements en agissant sur leurs conditions de possibilité. +Sans en proposer une formalisation technique, Michel Foucault en saisit +l'inflexion dans ses analyses de la gouvernementalité. Le pouvoir n'y +agit plus d'abord en imposant des normes explicites, mais en configurant +les conditions dans lesquelles les conduites deviennent possibles. +Gouverner consiste alors moins à ordonner qu'à structurer des +environnements d'action, à orienter les comportements en agissant sur +leurs conditions de possibilité. -Cette ligne trouve une formulation plus explicite dans les travaux d’Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns, qui décrivent la montée d’une gouvernementalité algorithmique. Celle-ci se distingue par un déplacement radical : la régulation n’y passe plus par l’interpellation de sujets ni par la production de normes explicites, mais par le traitement inductif de données massives, à partir desquelles sont dégagées des corrélations opératoires. Les conduites ne sont plus prescrites ; elles sont anticipées, profilées et modulées en fonction de probabilités calculées. +Cette ligne trouve une formulation plus explicite dans les travaux +d'Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns, qui décrivent la montée d'une +gouvernementalité algorithmique. Celle-ci se distingue par un +déplacement radical : la régulation n'y passe plus par l'interpellation +de sujets ni par la production de normes explicites, mais par le +traitement inductif de données massives, à partir desquelles sont +dégagées des corrélations opératoires. Les conduites ne sont plus +prescrites ; elles sont anticipées, profilées et modulées en fonction de +probabilités calculées. -Ce déplacement engage une transformation de la rationalité politique elle-même. La causalité cède en partie la place à la corrélation, la décision à la probabilité, la norme à la modélisation. Le pouvoir ne disparaît pas ; il change de registre. Il ne s’exerce plus prioritairement dans l’énoncé d’une règle, mais dans la capacité à orienter des trajectoires à partir de leurs régularités statistiques. +Ce déplacement engage une transformation de la rationalité politique +elle-même. La causalité cède en partie la place à la corrélation, la +décision à la probabilité, la norme à la modélisation. Le pouvoir ne +disparaît pas ; il change de registre. Il ne s'exerce plus +prioritairement dans l'énoncé d'une règle, mais dans la capacité à +orienter des trajectoires à partir de leurs régularités statistiques. -Il en résulte une forme de régulation qui ne s’impose plus frontalement, mais s’inscrit dans l’environnement même de l’action. Les dispositifs contemporains — qu’il s’agisse de personnalisation algorithmique, de design persuasif ou de modulation attentionnelle — n’ordonnent pas directement les comportements : ils en redistribuent les conditions d’émergence. Ce que l’on peut désigner, à la suite de ces analyses, comme une forme de post-régulation ne signifie donc pas disparition de la normativité, mais transformation de ses modalités : d’une régulation explicite et discursive à une régulation implicite et opératoire. +Il en résulte une forme de régulation qui ne s'impose plus frontalement, +mais s'inscrit dans l'environnement même de l'action. Les dispositifs +contemporains — qu'il s'agisse de personnalisation algorithmique, de +design persuasif ou de modulation attentionnelle — n'ordonnent pas +directement les comportements : ils en redistribuent les conditions +d'émergence. Ce que l'on peut désigner, à la suite de ces analyses, +comme une forme de post-régulation ne signifie donc pas disparition de +la normativité, mais transformation de ses modalités : d'une régulation +explicite et discursive à une régulation implicite et opératoire. -Il serait intellectuellement trompeur de réduire le régime cybernético-calculatoire à une abstraction purement logicielle. La régulation algorithmique ne se déploie pas dans un espace immatériel : elle repose sur une infrastructure matérielle dense, énergivore et géopolitiquement située, sans laquelle aucune modulation en temps réel ne serait possible. L’archicratie numérique ne flotte pas dans un « nuage » ; elle s’ancre dans des dispositifs techniques, industriels et extractifs qui en conditionnent l’effectivité. +Il serait intellectuellement trompeur de réduire le régime +cybernético-calculatoire à une abstraction purement logicielle. La +régulation algorithmique ne se déploie pas dans un espace immatériel : +elle repose sur une infrastructure matérielle dense, énergivore et +géopolitiquement située, sans laquelle aucune modulation en temps réel +ne serait possible. L'archicratie numérique ne flotte pas dans un « +nuage » ; elle s'ancre dans des dispositifs techniques, industriels et +extractifs qui en conditionnent l'effectivité. -Cette infrastructure forme le socle discret mais décisif du régime. Elle comprend, en premier lieu, les centres de données, où s’opèrent le stockage, le calcul et l’entraînement des modèles. Ces installations concentrent des puissances de traitement considérables, au prix d’une consommation énergétique massive et d’une dépendance à des chaînes logistiques globalisées. Elles matérialisent une première dimension de la régulation contemporaine : sa sédimentation énergétique. +Cette infrastructure forme le socle discret mais décisif du régime. Elle +comprend, en premier lieu, les centres de données, où s'opèrent le +stockage, le calcul et l'entraînement des modèles. Ces installations +concentrent des puissances de traitement considérables, au prix d'une +consommation énergétique massive et d'une dépendance à des chaînes +logistiques globalisées. Elles matérialisent une première dimension de +la régulation contemporaine : sa sédimentation énergétique. -À cette couche s’ajoute une trame connective planétaire, constituée de réseaux de fibres optiques, de câbles sous-marins, de relais et de points d’interconnexion. La régulation y prend une dimension topologique : elle dépend de la vitesse de circulation des données, de la latence des transmissions et de la continuité des flux. L’espace du pouvoir se redessine alors selon une géographie des connexions, où l’accessibilité et la rapidité deviennent des conditions décisives de l’action. +À cette couche s'ajoute une trame connective planétaire, constituée de +réseaux de fibres optiques, de câbles sous-marins, de relais et de +points d'interconnexion. La régulation y prend une dimension topologique +: elle dépend de la vitesse de circulation des données, de la latence +des transmissions et de la continuité des flux. L'espace du pouvoir se +redessine alors selon une géographie des connexions, où l'accessibilité +et la rapidité deviennent des conditions décisives de l'action. -Au cœur de cet agencement se trouvent également les architectures matérielles du calcul — processeurs, circuits spécialisés, accélérateurs dédiés à l’apprentissage automatique — qui conditionnent la capacité même à produire des prédictions et à traiter des volumes massifs de données. La puissance régulatrice ne tient pas seulement aux algorithmes, mais à leur inscription dans des supports matériels capables d’exécuter, d’itérer et d’optimiser à grande échelle. +Au cœur de cet agencement se trouvent également les architectures +matérielles du calcul — processeurs, circuits spécialisés, +accélérateurs dédiés à l'apprentissage automatique — qui conditionnent +la capacité même à produire des prédictions et à traiter des volumes +massifs de données. La puissance régulatrice ne tient pas seulement aux +algorithmes, mais à leur inscription dans des supports matériels +capables d'exécuter, d'itérer et d'optimiser à grande échelle. -Enfin, cette infrastructure repose sur une base extractive rarement intégrée à l’analyse des régimes numériques. L’exploitation de ressources minérales — métaux rares, composants électroniques — et les chaînes industrielles qui les transforment constituent une condition matérielle essentielle de la régulation contemporaine. L’archicratie numérique implique ainsi une redistribution des dépendances, qui relie les centres de calcul aux zones d’extraction, et les espaces de consommation aux territoires de production. +Enfin, cette infrastructure repose sur une base extractive rarement +intégrée à l'analyse des régimes numériques. L'exploitation de +ressources minérales — métaux rares, composants électroniques — et +les chaînes industrielles qui les transforment constituent une condition +matérielle essentielle de la régulation contemporaine. L'archicratie +numérique implique ainsi une redistribution des dépendances, qui relie +les centres de calcul aux zones d'extraction, et les espaces de +consommation aux territoires de production. -Ce niveau d’analyse est décisif. Il permet de comprendre que la régulation cybernétique n’est pas seulement une transformation des formes du pouvoir, mais aussi une reconfiguration de ses assises matérielles. La normativité algorithmique ne s’exerce qu’à travers une infrastructure qui capte, transporte, stocke et traite l’information. Elle n’est pas une simple couche logicielle ajoutée au monde social : elle en recompose les conditions physiques d’organisation. +Ce niveau d'analyse est décisif. Il permet de comprendre que la +régulation cybernétique n'est pas seulement une transformation des +formes du pouvoir, mais aussi une reconfiguration de ses assises +matérielles. La normativité algorithmique ne s'exerce qu'à travers une +infrastructure qui capte, transporte, stocke et traite l'information. +Elle n'est pas une simple couche logicielle ajoutée au monde social : +elle en recompose les conditions physiques d'organisation. -L’archicratie numérique apparaît ainsi comme une régulation à la fois computationnelle et matérielle. Elle opère par calcul, mais sur la base d’un agencement technique, énergétique et extractif qui en constitue la condition silencieuse. Comprendre cette matérialité, ce n’est pas ajouter un décor à l’analyse : c’est restituer le niveau réel où se joue la possibilité même d’une régulation par la donnée. +L'archicratie numérique apparaît ainsi comme une régulation à la fois +computationnelle et matérielle. Elle opère par calcul, mais sur la base +d'un agencement technique, énergétique et extractif qui en constitue la +condition silencieuse. Comprendre cette matérialité, ce n'est pas +ajouter un décor à l'analyse : c'est restituer le niveau réel où se joue +la possibilité même d'une régulation par la donnée. -Si l’infrastructure machinique forme le soubassement matériel du régime cybernético-calculatoire, sa fonction régulatrice propre se déploie dans la capacité à anticiper et à orienter les conduites à partir de modèles probabilistes. La régulation ne passe plus prioritairement par l’énoncé de normes explicites, mais par la modélisation des comportements et l’ajustement continu des environnements d’action. Ce déplacement engage une transformation décisive de l’archicration elle-même. +Si l'infrastructure machinique forme le soubassement matériel du régime +cybernético-calculatoire, sa fonction régulatrice propre se déploie dans +la capacité à anticiper et à orienter les conduites à partir de modèles +probabilistes. La régulation ne passe plus prioritairement par l'énoncé +de normes explicites, mais par la modélisation des comportements et +l'ajustement continu des environnements d'action. Ce déplacement engage +une transformation décisive de l'archicration elle-même. -Dans ses formes antérieures, l’archicration procédait par exposition : la norme était énoncée, discutée, contestée, éventuellement révisée dans des scènes identifiables. Ici, elle tend à s’opérer en amont de toute mise en débat, sous forme d’anticipation intégrée. La régulation ne vise plus d’abord à contraindre ou à interdire, mais à rendre certaines conduites plus probables que d’autres, en redistribuant silencieusement les conditions de leur émergence. +Dans ses formes antérieures, l'archicration procédait par exposition : +la norme était énoncée, discutée, contestée, éventuellement révisée dans +des scènes identifiables. Ici, elle tend à s'opérer en amont de toute +mise en débat, sous forme d'anticipation intégrée. La régulation ne vise +plus d'abord à contraindre ou à interdire, mais à rendre certaines +conduites plus probables que d'autres, en redistribuant silencieusement +les conditions de leur émergence. -Cette mutation trouve sa forme la plus nette dans les dispositifs algorithmiques contemporains. Qu’il s’agisse d’attribution de crédit, de gestion logistique, de recommandations culturelles ou de ciblage informationnel, ces systèmes n’imposent pas directement des décisions visibles ; ils organisent des trajectoires. Ils s’appuient sur l’agrégation de données passées, dont ils extraient des régularités statistiques afin de projeter des comportements futurs. Le pouvoir ne se manifeste plus prioritairement comme décision ponctuelle, mais comme capacité à orienter des probabilités. +Cette mutation trouve sa forme la plus nette dans les dispositifs +algorithmiques contemporains. Qu'il s'agisse d'attribution de crédit, de +gestion logistique, de recommandations culturelles ou de ciblage +informationnel, ces systèmes n'imposent pas directement des décisions +visibles ; ils organisent des trajectoires. Ils s'appuient sur +l'agrégation de données passées, dont ils extraient des régularités +statistiques afin de projeter des comportements futurs. Le pouvoir ne se +manifeste plus prioritairement comme décision ponctuelle, mais comme +capacité à orienter des probabilités. -Ce déplacement correspond à ce que certains travaux désignent comme gouvernementalité algorithmique : une forme de régulation qui ne s’adresse plus à des sujets comme porteurs de droits ou de devoirs, mais à des profils construits à partir de corrélations. Les individus ne sont plus interpellés comme tels ; ils sont inscrits dans des distributions de probabilité à partir desquelles sont ajustées les conditions de leur action. La norme ne disparaît pas ; elle se déplace dans les modèles qui configurent ces distributions. +Ce déplacement correspond à ce que certains travaux désignent comme +gouvernementalité algorithmique : une forme de régulation qui ne +s'adresse plus à des sujets comme porteurs de droits ou de devoirs, mais +à des profils construits à partir de corrélations. Les individus ne sont +plus interpellés comme tels ; ils sont inscrits dans des distributions +de probabilité à partir desquelles sont ajustées les conditions de leur +action. La norme ne disparaît pas ; elle se déplace dans les modèles qui +configurent ces distributions. -Il en résulte une transformation de la temporalité du pouvoir. Là où la régulation procédait classiquement par décision et par application, elle opère désormais par anticipation et par correction continue. Le présent devient un point d’ajustement entre des passés agrégés et des futurs probabilisés. La régulation n’attend plus l’écart pour intervenir ; elle tend à le préempter en modifiant en amont les conditions dans lesquelles il pourrait se produire. +Il en résulte une transformation de la temporalité du pouvoir. Là où la +régulation procédait classiquement par décision et par application, elle +opère désormais par anticipation et par correction continue. Le présent +devient un point d'ajustement entre des passés agrégés et des futurs +probabilisés. La régulation n'attend plus l'écart pour intervenir ; elle +tend à le préempter en modifiant en amont les conditions dans lesquelles +il pourrait se produire. -Cette logique se manifeste également dans des dispositifs plus discrets, tels que les techniques de design comportemental ou de captation attentionnelle. Ceux-ci n’imposent pas d’obligations explicites ; ils orientent les choix en jouant sur la présentation des options, la hiérarchisation des informations ou l’économie de l’attention. L’action n’est pas empêchée ; elle est canalisée. L’individu n’est pas contraint ; il est guidé dans un espace de possibles déjà structuré. +Cette logique se manifeste également dans des dispositifs plus discrets, +tels que les techniques de design comportemental ou de captation +attentionnelle. Ceux-ci n'imposent pas d'obligations explicites ; ils +orientent les choix en jouant sur la présentation des options, la +hiérarchisation des informations ou l'économie de l'attention. L'action +n'est pas empêchée ; elle est canalisée. L'individu n'est pas contraint +; il est guidé dans un espace de possibles déjà structuré. -L’archicration prédictive se distingue ainsi par un double mouvement. D’une part, elle réduit la nécessité de scènes explicites de confrontation normative : la régulation s’opère en grande partie avant que la norme ne devienne objet de débat. D’autre part, elle rend plus difficile l’identification même des lieux où la norme pourrait être contestée, dans la mesure où celle-ci se trouve disséminée dans des modèles, des interfaces et des paramètres techniques. +L'archicration prédictive se distingue ainsi par un double mouvement. +D'une part, elle réduit la nécessité de scènes explicites de +confrontation normative : la régulation s'opère en grande partie avant +que la norme ne devienne objet de débat. D'autre part, elle rend plus +difficile l'identification même des lieux où la norme pourrait être +contestée, dans la mesure où celle-ci se trouve disséminée dans des +modèles, des interfaces et des paramètres techniques. -Il ne s’agit pas pour autant d’une disparition de toute conflictualité. Mais celle-ci se trouve déplacée. Elle ne porte plus principalement sur des règles explicitement formulées, mais sur les conditions de production des modèles, sur les données mobilisées, sur les critères implicites de classement et sur les effets différenciés des dispositifs. La régulation devient moins visible comme norme, plus difficilement saisissable comme objet de débat, sans cesser d’exercer des effets structurants sur les conduites. +Il ne s'agit pas pour autant d'une disparition de toute conflictualité. +Mais celle-ci se trouve déplacée. Elle ne porte plus principalement sur +des règles explicitement formulées, mais sur les conditions de +production des modèles, sur les données mobilisées, sur les critères +implicites de classement et sur les effets différenciés des dispositifs. +La régulation devient moins visible comme norme, plus difficilement +saisissable comme objet de débat, sans cesser d'exercer des effets +structurants sur les conduites. -L’archicration cybernétique peut ainsi être définie comme une régulation par modulation anticipée des possibles. Elle n’abolit pas la normativité ; elle en transforme les modalités d’exercice. La norme n’est plus seulement ce qui se dit et se discute ; elle devient ce qui s’incorpore dans les conditions mêmes de l’action, sous forme de probabilités, de seuils et d’ajustements continus. +L'archicration cybernétique peut ainsi être définie comme une régulation +par modulation anticipée des possibles. Elle n'abolit pas la normativité +; elle en transforme les modalités d'exercice. La norme n'est plus +seulement ce qui se dit et se discute ; elle devient ce qui s'incorpore +dans les conditions mêmes de l'action, sous forme de probabilités, de +seuils et d'ajustements continus. -Ce régime archicratique d’un nouveau type ne supprime pas les trois vecteurs fondamentaux de la régulation ; il en reconfigure l’agencement. L’arcalité, la cratialité et l’archicration ne disparaissent pas : elles se redistribuent dans une topologie différente, moins visible, moins localisable, mais néanmoins opératoire. +Ce régime archicratique d'un nouveau type ne supprime pas les trois +vecteurs fondamentaux de la régulation ; il en reconfigure l'agencement. +L'arcalité, la cratialité et l'archicration ne disparaissent pas : elles +se redistribuent dans une topologie différente, moins visible, moins +localisable, mais néanmoins opératoire. -La cratialité, tout d’abord, ne s’exerce plus prioritairement sous la forme d’une contrainte identifiable ou d’un centre de décision. Elle se diffuse dans des dispositifs qui orientent les conduites en amont de toute action explicite. L’exercice du pouvoir ne consiste plus principalement à interdire ou à sanctionner, mais à configurer les conditions dans lesquelles certaines trajectoires deviennent plus accessibles que d’autres. Cette cratialité distribuée opère par seuils, par filtrage, par hiérarchisation implicite des possibles. Elle ne se donne pas comme coercition manifeste ; elle agit comme structuration de l’environnement d’action. +La cratialité, tout d'abord, ne s'exerce plus prioritairement sous la +forme d'une contrainte identifiable ou d'un centre de décision. Elle se +diffuse dans des dispositifs qui orientent les conduites en amont de +toute action explicite. L'exercice du pouvoir ne consiste plus +principalement à interdire ou à sanctionner, mais à configurer les +conditions dans lesquelles certaines trajectoires deviennent plus +accessibles que d'autres. Cette cratialité distribuée opère par seuils, +par filtrage, par hiérarchisation implicite des possibles. Elle ne se +donne pas comme coercition manifeste ; elle agit comme structuration de +l'environnement d'action. -L’arcalité, quant à elle, ne se présente plus sous la forme d’un principe fondateur explicitement formulé, qu’il soit juridique, politique ou symbolique. Elle se trouve inscrite dans les architectures techniques elles-mêmes. Protocoles, formats de données, structures d’accès, organisation des interfaces : autant d’éléments qui distribuent les positions, hiérarchisent les interactions et définissent les conditions de circulation dans l’espace numérique. Le fondement ne disparaît pas ; il devient immanent à l’agencement technique. Il ne s’énonce plus comme source de légitimité ; il opère comme condition d’organisation. +L'arcalité, quant à elle, ne se présente plus sous la forme d'un +principe fondateur explicitement formulé, qu'il soit juridique, +politique ou symbolique. Elle se trouve inscrite dans les architectures +techniques elles-mêmes. Protocoles, formats de données, structures +d'accès, organisation des interfaces : autant d'éléments qui distribuent +les positions, hiérarchisent les interactions et définissent les +conditions de circulation dans l'espace numérique. Le fondement ne +disparaît pas ; il devient immanent à l'agencement technique. Il ne +s'énonce plus comme source de légitimité ; il opère comme condition +d'organisation. -L’archicration, enfin, connaît une transformation décisive. Elle ne se déploie plus principalement dans des scènes où la norme est exposée, discutée et contestée. Elle tend à s’intégrer directement dans les dispositifs eux-mêmes, sous forme de modulation continue. La régulation n’attend plus la mise en débat pour se reconfigurer ; elle s’ajuste en permanence à partir des flux de données qu’elle capte. L’exposition de la norme se raréfie, tandis que son opérationnalité s’intensifie. L’archicration ne disparaît pas ; elle devient moins événementielle, plus processuelle. +L'archicration, enfin, connaît une transformation décisive. Elle ne se +déploie plus principalement dans des scènes où la norme est exposée, +discutée et contestée. Elle tend à s'intégrer directement dans les +dispositifs eux-mêmes, sous forme de modulation continue. La régulation +n'attend plus la mise en débat pour se reconfigurer ; elle s'ajuste en +permanence à partir des flux de données qu'elle capte. L'exposition de +la norme se raréfie, tandis que son opérationnalité s'intensifie. +L'archicration ne disparaît pas ; elle devient moins événementielle, +plus processuelle. -Ce déplacement modifie la géométrie d’ensemble du régime. Là où les formes régulatrices antérieures permettaient encore d’identifier des lieux, des moments ou des instances dans lesquels la régulation pouvait être interrogée, le régime cybernétique tend à dissoudre ces points d’appui dans des infrastructures continues. La distinction entre fondement, exercice et mise en épreuve ne s’abolit pas, mais elle devient plus difficile à isoler analytiquement, dans la mesure où ces dimensions se trouvent partiellement intégrées dans un même environnement technique. +Ce déplacement modifie la géométrie d'ensemble du régime. Là où les +formes régulatrices antérieures permettaient encore d'identifier des +lieux, des moments ou des instances dans lesquels la régulation pouvait +être interrogée, le régime cybernétique tend à dissoudre ces points +d'appui dans des infrastructures continues. La distinction entre +fondement, exercice et mise en épreuve ne s'abolit pas, mais elle +devient plus difficile à isoler analytiquement, dans la mesure où ces +dimensions se trouvent partiellement intégrées dans un même +environnement technique. -Il en résulte une configuration dans laquelle la régulation apparaît à la fois plus diffuse et plus serrée. Plus diffuse, parce qu’elle ne s’incarne plus dans des instances clairement identifiables ; plus serrée, parce qu’elle intervient de manière plus continue dans la structuration des possibles. Le pouvoir ne se retire pas ; il change de forme. Il ne se manifeste plus prioritairement dans l’exception ou dans la décision, mais dans la constance d’un agencement qui oriente sans cesse les trajectoires. +Il en résulte une configuration dans laquelle la régulation apparaît à +la fois plus diffuse et plus serrée. Plus diffuse, parce qu'elle ne +s'incarne plus dans des instances clairement identifiables ; plus +serrée, parce qu'elle intervient de manière plus continue dans la +structuration des possibles. Le pouvoir ne se retire pas ; il change de +forme. Il ne se manifeste plus prioritairement dans l'exception ou dans +la décision, mais dans la constance d'un agencement qui oriente sans +cesse les trajectoires. -La reconfiguration archicratique propre au régime cybernétique peut ainsi être comprise comme un passage d’une régulation fondée sur la séparation relative des vecteurs à une régulation où ceux-ci tendent à s’intégrer dans une même infrastructure. L’arcalité s’incorpore aux architectures, la cratialité se distribue dans les dispositifs, l’archicration s’inscrit dans les processus. Ce n’est pas une disparition du triangle, mais une mutation de sa lisibilité : ce qui était auparavant exposable devient en partie enfoui dans les conditions mêmes de l’action. +La reconfiguration archicratique propre au régime cybernétique peut +ainsi être comprise comme un passage d'une régulation fondée sur la +séparation relative des vecteurs à une régulation où ceux-ci tendent à +s'intégrer dans une même infrastructure. L'arcalité s'incorpore aux +architectures, la cratialité se distribue dans les dispositifs, +l'archicration s'inscrit dans les processus. Ce n'est pas une +disparition du triangle, mais une mutation de sa lisibilité : ce qui +était auparavant exposable devient en partie enfoui dans les conditions +mêmes de l'action. -Ce régime archicratique — qui n’a ni souverain visible ni scène spectaculaire — ne doit pas être compris comme une disparition du politique, mais comme une transformation de ses conditions d’exercice. La régulation ne s’y retire pas ; elle se déplace vers des formes moins exposées, moins opposables, mais plus continues et plus intégrées aux environnements d’action. +Ce régime archicratique — qui n'a ni souverain visible ni scène +spectaculaire — ne doit pas être compris comme une disparition du +politique, mais comme une transformation de ses conditions d'exercice. +La régulation ne s'y retire pas ; elle se déplace vers des formes moins +exposées, moins opposables, mais plus continues et plus intégrées aux +environnements d'action. -Sa spécificité tient à une double mutation. D’une part, la norme cesse d’apparaître principalement comme règle explicite pour se loger dans les conditions mêmes de l’agir : architectures techniques, modèles probabilistes, dispositifs d’interface. D’autre part, les lieux de mise en débat se raréfient ou se déplacent, dans la mesure où la régulation opère en amont, au niveau de la configuration des possibles plutôt que dans celui de leur évaluation explicite. +Sa spécificité tient à une double mutation. D'une part, la norme cesse +d'apparaître principalement comme règle explicite pour se loger dans les +conditions mêmes de l'agir : architectures techniques, modèles +probabilistes, dispositifs d'interface. D'autre part, les lieux de mise +en débat se raréfient ou se déplacent, dans la mesure où la régulation +opère en amont, au niveau de la configuration des possibles plutôt que +dans celui de leur évaluation explicite. -Il en résulte une configuration archicratique singulière : une régulation sans centre unifié, mais non sans cohérence ; sans déclaration formelle, mais non sans effets structurants ; sans scène évidente, mais non sans opérativité. La co-viabilité n’y est plus prioritairement soutenue par la loi, la procédure ou la délibération, mais par l’ajustement continu des trajectoires au sein d’environnements calculés. +Il en résulte une configuration archicratique singulière : une +régulation sans centre unifié, mais non sans cohérence ; sans +déclaration formelle, mais non sans effets structurants ; sans scène +évidente, mais non sans opérativité. La co-viabilité n'y est plus +prioritairement soutenue par la loi, la procédure ou la délibération, +mais par l'ajustement continu des trajectoires au sein d'environnements +calculés. -Les tensions et les conflits ne disparaissent pas pour autant ; leurs modalités se trouvent profondément déplacées Ceux-ci portent moins sur des normes explicitement formulées que sur les conditions de production des modèles, sur les infrastructures qui les soutiennent et sur les effets différenciés des dispositifs. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas ; elle devient plus diffuse, plus technique, plus difficile à localiser comme telle. +Les tensions et les conflits ne disparaissent pas pour autant ; leurs +modalités se trouvent profondément déplacées Ceux-ci portent moins sur +des normes explicitement formulées que sur les conditions de production +des modèles, sur les infrastructures qui les soutiennent et sur les +effets différenciés des dispositifs. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas +; elle devient plus diffuse, plus technique, plus difficile à localiser +comme telle. -Le régime cybernético-calculatoire apparaît ainsi comme une configuration limite de l’archicratie : non parce qu’il en abolirait les vecteurs, mais parce qu’il en rend la lisibilité plus incertaine. L’arcalité s’y incorpore aux architectures, la cratialité se distribue dans les dispositifs, l’archicration se déplace vers des processus d’anticipation intégrée. +Le régime cybernético-calculatoire apparaît ainsi comme une +configuration limite de l'archicratie : non parce qu'il en abolirait les +vecteurs, mais parce qu'il en rend la lisibilité plus incertaine. +L'arcalité s'y incorpore aux architectures, la cratialité se distribue +dans les dispositifs, l'archicration se déplace vers des processus +d'anticipation intégrée. -C’est en cela que ce régime constitue un seuil. Non pas un aboutissement, mais un point de bascule à partir duquel la question archicratique — celle des conditions de mise en débat, de contestabilité et de révision des normes — se trouve à nouveau posée, mais dans des termes profondément renouvelés. Ce qui se joue ici n’est pas la fin de la régulation, mais la transformation de ses formes d’apparition et, par là même, des possibilités de sa mise à l’épreuve. Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les traits fondamentaux de cette configuration. +C'est en cela que ce régime constitue un seuil. Non pas un +aboutissement, mais un point de bascule à partir duquel la question +archicratique — celle des conditions de mise en débat, de +contestabilité et de révision des normes — se trouve à nouveau posée, +mais dans des termes profondément renouvelés. Ce qui se joue ici n'est +pas la fin de la régulation, mais la transformation de ses formes +d'apparition et, par là même, des possibilités de sa mise à l'épreuve. +Un tableau de synthèse présenté en annexe récapitule les traits +fondamentaux de cette configuration. ## **Conclusion du chapitre 2 — Archéologie des régimes régulateurs et stabilisation du paradigme archicratique** -Ce deuxième chapitre n’avait pas pour fonction d’ajouter une galerie historique au paradigme archicratique, ni d’illustrer après coup une grille déjà constituée. Sa tâche était plus décisive : éprouver, sur la longue durée et à travers des configurations profondément hétérogènes, la validité réelle d’une hypothèse théorique formulée au chapitre 1. Autrement dit, il s’agissait de savoir si la triade arcalité / cratialité / archicration permet effectivement de décrire, de discriminer et de comparer les manières diverses dont les sociétés humaines ont cherché à rendre la co-viabilité possible. L’enjeu n’était pas mince. Car si cette hypothèse échouait au contact de l’histoire, elle ne serait qu’une élégance conceptuelle de plus. Si, au contraire, elle résistait à l’épreuve des matériaux, des écarts de civilisation, des bascules d’époque et des différences de texture régulatrice, alors elle cesserait d’être une simple proposition théorique pour devenir un véritable opérateur d’intelligibilité historique. +Ce deuxième chapitre n'avait pas pour fonction d'ajouter une galerie +historique au paradigme archicratique, ni d'illustrer après coup une +grille déjà constituée. Sa tâche était plus décisive : éprouver, sur la +longue durée et à travers des configurations profondément hétérogènes, +la validité réelle d'une hypothèse théorique formulée au chapitre 1. +Autrement dit, il s'agissait de savoir si la triade arcalité / +cratialité / archicration permet effectivement de décrire, de +discriminer et de comparer les manières diverses dont les sociétés +humaines ont cherché à rendre la co-viabilité possible. L'enjeu n'était +pas mince. Car si cette hypothèse échouait au contact de l'histoire, +elle ne serait qu'une élégance conceptuelle de plus. Si, au contraire, +elle résistait à l'épreuve des matériaux, des écarts de civilisation, +des bascules d'époque et des différences de texture régulatrice, alors +elle cesserait d'être une simple proposition théorique pour devenir un +véritable opérateur d'intelligibilité historique. -Cette résistance, toutefois, ne peut être affirmée qu’à une condition : que l’on ne confonde pas survivance de la grille et gain de connaissance. Le chapitre n’autorise donc nul triomphalisme paradigmatique. Ce qu’il établit, plus sobrement mais plus rigoureusement, c’est que la triade archicratique demeure pertinente chaque fois qu’elle permet de distinguer, dans des montages historiques hétérogènes, ce qui rend un ordre recevable, ce qui le fait agir, et ce qui le rend transformable ou non. Là où cette distinction se brouillerait au point de devenir pure commodité d’écriture, le paradigme perdrait sa force. Il ne vaut qu’à proportion de la différence d’intelligibilité qu’il produit effectivement. +Cette résistance, toutefois, ne peut être affirmée qu'à une condition : +que l'on ne confonde pas survivance de la grille et gain de +connaissance. Le chapitre n'autorise donc nul triomphalisme +paradigmatique. Ce qu'il établit, plus sobrement mais plus +rigoureusement, c'est que la triade archicratique demeure pertinente +chaque fois qu'elle permet de distinguer, dans des montages historiques +hétérogènes, ce qui rend un ordre recevable, ce qui le fait agir, et ce +qui le rend transformable ou non. Là où cette distinction se +brouillerait au point de devenir pure commodité d'écriture, le paradigme +perdrait sa force. Il ne vaut qu'à proportion de la différence +d'intelligibilité qu'il produit effectivement. -C’est bien ce second résultat qui se laisse désormais affirmer. Le chapitre 2 a confirmé que l’archicratie n’est ni un vocabulaire de surplomb, ni une métaphore commode, ni une abstraction plaquée sur des mondes disparates. Elle constitue une grammaire comparative robuste, capable de rendre lisible une multiplicité de régimes de co-viabilité sans les réduire à une histoire linéaire du pouvoir. En refusant d’emblée les trois dérives majeures qui menaçaient l’enquête — l’évolutionnisme naïf, qui aurait reconduit une marche imaginaire du rite vers l’algorithme ; l’étato-centrisme, qui aurait fait de l’État la forme suprême de toute régulation ; l’économicisme réducteur, qui aurait rabattu l’ordre social sur la seule allocation des ressources — le chapitre a pu faire apparaître autre chose : non pas une montée continue vers des formes prétendument supérieures de gouvernement, mais une pluralité de montages archicratiques, historiquement situés, morphologiquement distincts, parfois concurrents, souvent composites, toujours révélateurs d’une même exigence anthropologico-politique, celle de faire tenir ensemble des existences exposées à la tension. +C'est bien ce second résultat qui se laisse désormais affirmer. Le +chapitre 2 a confirmé que l'archicratie n'est ni un vocabulaire de +surplomb, ni une métaphore commode, ni une abstraction plaquée sur des +mondes disparates. Elle constitue une grammaire comparative robuste, +capable de rendre lisible une multiplicité de régimes de co-viabilité +sans les réduire à une histoire linéaire du pouvoir. En refusant +d'emblée les trois dérives majeures qui menaçaient l'enquête — l'évolutionnisme naïf, qui aurait reconduit une marche imaginaire du +rite vers l'algorithme ; l'étato-centrisme, qui aurait fait de l'État la +forme suprême de toute régulation ; l'économicisme réducteur, qui aurait +rabattu l'ordre social sur la seule allocation des ressources — le +chapitre a pu faire apparaître autre chose : non pas une montée continue +vers des formes prétendument supérieures de gouvernement, mais une +pluralité de montages archicratiques, historiquement situés, +morphologiquement distincts, parfois concurrents, souvent composites, +toujours révélateurs d'une même exigence anthropologico-politique, celle +de faire tenir ensemble des existences exposées à la tension. -La première grande leçon de cette archéogenèse est ainsi d’ordre méthodologique et ontologique tout à la fois : la régulation précède le politique institué. Non pas au sens où il existerait, avant toute histoire, une essence régulatrice pure ; mais au sens plus rigoureux où les formes explicites du pouvoir — État, souveraineté, constitution, administration, marché, gouvernement — s’adossent toujours à des pratiques de co-viabilité plus anciennes, plus diffuses, parfois moins visibles, qui conditionnent leur possibilité même. Bien avant que les sociétés ne se pensent en termes de droit, de représentation ou d’appareil politique, elles avaient déjà élaboré des dispositifs symboliques, rituels, spatiaux, techniques, scripturaux, narratifs, savants ou agonistiques capables de différer la violence, d’orienter les conduites, de distribuer les places, de rendre les tensions supportables. Le politique institué ne surgit donc jamais sur un sol nu. Il se sédimente sur des architectures régulatrices préalables, dont il réorganise la visibilité, la portée et les modes d’activation sans jamais les abolir complètement. +La première grande leçon de cette archéogenèse est ainsi d'ordre +méthodologique et ontologique tout à la fois : la régulation précède le +politique institué. Non pas au sens où il existerait, avant toute +histoire, une essence régulatrice pure ; mais au sens plus rigoureux où +les formes explicites du pouvoir — État, souveraineté, constitution, +administration, marché, gouvernement — s'adossent toujours à des +pratiques de co-viabilité plus anciennes, plus diffuses, parfois moins +visibles, qui conditionnent leur possibilité même. Bien avant que les +sociétés ne se pensent en termes de droit, de représentation ou +d'appareil politique, elles avaient déjà élaboré des dispositifs +symboliques, rituels, spatiaux, techniques, scripturaux, narratifs, +savants ou agonistiques capables de différer la violence, d'orienter les +conduites, de distribuer les places, de rendre les tensions +supportables. Le politique institué ne surgit donc jamais sur un sol nu. +Il se sédimente sur des architectures régulatrices préalables, dont il +réorganise la visibilité, la portée et les modes d'activation sans +jamais les abolir complètement. -La seconde leçon tient à la typologie elle-même. La section 2.2 a permis de dégager douze méta-régimes archicratiques spécifiques, prolongés par un treizième plan différentiel-hybride. Leur fonction n’était pas de distribuer des stades de développement, encore moins de classer les sociétés selon une échelle implicite de maturité. Ils ont plutôt configuré un espace de possibilités morphologiques. Chaque régime y apparaît comme une manière singulière de composer fondement, puissance et scène d’épreuve. Ici, la co-viabilité repose sur la mémoire vive, le geste, le rythme et l’incorporation symbolique ; là, sur la médiation sacrale non étatique ; ailleurs, sur l’agencement techno-logistique des flux, sur l’inscription scripturo-normative, sur l’alignement scripturo-cosmologique, sur la parole révélée, sur la mémoire historiographique, sur la validation épistémique, sur le partage du sensible, sur la formulation normativo-politique, sur l’équivalence marchande ou sur l’épreuve guerrière. À chaque fois, ce ne sont pas seulement des contenus qui changent, mais la manière même dont le monde commun se rend fondable, opératoire et contestable. +La seconde leçon tient à la typologie elle-même. La section 2.2 a permis +de dégager douze méta-régimes archicratiques spécifiques, prolongés par +un treizième plan différentiel-hybride. Leur fonction n'était pas de +distribuer des stades de développement, encore moins de classer les +sociétés selon une échelle implicite de maturité. Ils ont plutôt +configuré un espace de possibilités morphologiques. Chaque régime y +apparaît comme une manière singulière de composer fondement, puissance +et scène d'épreuve. Ici, la co-viabilité repose sur la mémoire vive, le +geste, le rythme et l'incorporation symbolique ; là, sur la médiation +sacrale non étatique ; ailleurs, sur l'agencement techno-logistique des +flux, sur l'inscription scripturo-normative, sur l'alignement +scripturo-cosmologique, sur la parole révélée, sur la mémoire +historiographique, sur la validation épistémique, sur le partage du +sensible, sur la formulation normativo-politique, sur l'équivalence +marchande ou sur l'épreuve guerrière. À chaque fois, ce ne sont pas +seulement des contenus qui changent, mais la manière même dont le monde +commun se rend fondable, opératoire et contestable. -Le chapitre a montré que ces dénominations sont insuffisantes si l’on ne les réinscrit pas dans une analyse plus profonde des modes de régulation qui les sous-tendent. Une cité peut mobiliser plusieurs régimes à la fois ; un empire peut tenir par autre chose que la seule centralisation ; une démocratie peut reconduire des mécanismes de tri, de conditionnalité et de captation ; un régime numérique peut réguler sans se déclarer comme forme politique autonome. La réalité historique ne s’ordonne donc pas selon des silhouettes institutionnelles immédiatement reconnaissables, mais selon des compositions variables entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. +Le chapitre a montré que ces dénominations sont insuffisantes si l'on ne +les réinscrit pas dans une analyse plus profonde des modes de régulation +qui les sous-tendent. Une cité peut mobiliser plusieurs régimes à la +fois ; un empire peut tenir par autre chose que la seule centralisation +; une démocratie peut reconduire des mécanismes de tri, de +conditionnalité et de captation ; un régime numérique peut réguler sans +se déclarer comme forme politique autonome. La réalité historique ne +s'ordonne donc pas selon des silhouettes institutionnelles immédiatement +reconnaissables, mais selon des compositions variables entre arcalité, +cratialité et archicration. -La troisième leçon, plus décisive encore, concerne l’archicration elle-même. Le chapitre confirme qu’il faut réserver ce concept à un phénomène précis et exigeant. Toute régulation n’est pas archicration. Il peut exister de la régulation dans l’opacité, dans l’immédiateté, dans la pure inertie d’un agencement, dans la simple coordination logistique, dans la violence silencieuse d’un tri, dans l’intériorisation des contraintes ou dans la diffusion d’une norme incorporée. L’archicration, elle, commence lorsque se forme une scène d’épreuve différée, visible, opposable, dans laquelle la relation entre ce qui fonde et ce qui opère devient en quelque sorte comparable à elle-même, exposée à la reprise, à la contradiction, à la révision ou à la requalification. Ce point est capital, parce qu’il évite de dissoudre le concept dans une synonymie vague avec « régulation » ou « gouvernance ». Le chapitre 2 a précisément donné à voir que certaines sociétés régulent beaucoup sans archicration forte, tandis que d’autres instituent des scènes où les fondements et les puissances peuvent, au moins partiellement, comparaître. +La troisième leçon, plus décisive encore, concerne l'archicration +elle-même. Le chapitre confirme qu'il faut réserver ce concept à un +phénomène précis et exigeant. Toute régulation n'est pas archicration. +Il peut exister de la régulation dans l'opacité, dans l'immédiateté, +dans la pure inertie d'un agencement, dans la simple coordination +logistique, dans la violence silencieuse d'un tri, dans +l'intériorisation des contraintes ou dans la diffusion d'une norme +incorporée. L'archicration, elle, commence lorsque se forme une scène +d'épreuve différée, visible, opposable, dans laquelle la relation entre +ce qui fonde et ce qui opère devient en quelque sorte comparable à +elle-même, exposée à la reprise, à la contradiction, à la révision ou à +la requalification. Ce point est capital, parce qu'il évite de dissoudre +le concept dans une synonymie vague avec « régulation » ou « gouvernance +». Le chapitre 2 a précisément donné à voir que certaines sociétés +régulent beaucoup sans archicration forte, tandis que d'autres +instituent des scènes où les fondements et les puissances peuvent, au +moins partiellement, comparaître. -C’est ici qu’apparaît la portée heuristique de la figure d’*homo archicraticus*. Il ne s’agit évidemment pas d’une essence anthropologique intemporelle, mais d’un opérateur de lecture. L’animal humain n’apparaît plus seulement comme sujet de souveraineté, de représentation, de décision ou d’intérêt, mais comme vivant pris dans des dispositifs de co-viabilité, affecté par des scènes où se négocient les conditions de sa participation au monde commun. Le chapitre a donné à voir des sujets très différents — initiés, fidèles, scribes, guerriers, citoyens, justiciables, travailleurs, bénéficiaires, usagers, profils calculés — mais tous étaient traversés par des montages qui les rendaient plus ou moins aptes à tenir, supporter, habiter ou contester leur monde. L’originalité du paradigme archicratique est là : il ne demande pas d’abord ce qu’est le pouvoir en soi, ni qui l’exerce, ni quel en est le titulaire légitime, mais comment une société organise la tenue effective de la coexistence sous tension. +C'est ici qu'apparaît la portée heuristique de la figure d'*homo +archicraticus*. Il ne s'agit évidemment pas d'une essence +anthropologique intemporelle, mais d'un opérateur de lecture. L'animal +humain n'apparaît plus seulement comme sujet de souveraineté, de +représentation, de décision ou d'intérêt, mais comme vivant pris dans +des dispositifs de co-viabilité, affecté par des scènes où se négocient +les conditions de sa participation au monde commun. Le chapitre a donné +à voir des sujets très différents — initiés, fidèles, scribes, +guerriers, citoyens, justiciables, travailleurs, bénéficiaires, usagers, +profils calculés — mais tous étaient traversés par des montages qui +les rendaient plus ou moins aptes à tenir, supporter, habiter ou +contester leur monde. L'originalité du paradigme archicratique est là : +il ne demande pas d'abord ce qu'est le pouvoir en soi, ni qui l'exerce, +ni quel en est le titulaire légitime, mais comment une société organise +la tenue effective de la coexistence sous tension. -La section 2.3 a ensuite permis d’éprouver ce cadre dans l’épaisseur historique. L’Antiquité n’y apparaissait plus comme berceau abstrait du politique, mais comme champ de différenciation entre plusieurs manières de rendre l’ordre visible, durable et opératoire. Les mondes religieux et suzerains médiévaux ont montré la coexistence de régimes scripturaux, théologiques, historiques et juridico-politiques. Les monarchies renaissantes ont rendu lisible l’épaississement des formes de centralisation, de représentation et de mise en scène de l’autorité. Les régimes disciplinaires et totalitaires ont révélé jusqu’à l’extrême ce qui se produit lorsque la saturation normative prétend rejoindre la fabrication intégrale des conduites et des subjectivités. Les démocraties providentielles, loin d’être des sorties simples hors de la domination, ont fait apparaître d’autres modes de co-viabilité, fondés sur les droits sociaux, la gestion statistique des risques, la bureaucratie procédurale et l’existence, plus ou moins réelle, d’arènes de contestation. Enfin, la configuration cybernétique a déplacé le problème vers un régime où la norme tend à se dissoudre dans l’environnement même de l’action, sous forme d’anticipation, de calcul, de profilage, de modulation et d’intégration infrastructurelle. +La section 2.3 a ensuite permis d'éprouver ce cadre dans l'épaisseur +historique. L'Antiquité n'y apparaissait plus comme berceau abstrait du +politique, mais comme champ de différenciation entre plusieurs manières +de rendre l'ordre visible, durable et opératoire. Les mondes religieux +et suzerains médiévaux ont montré la coexistence de régimes scripturaux, +théologiques, historiques et juridico-politiques. Les monarchies +renaissantes ont rendu lisible l'épaississement des formes de +centralisation, de représentation et de mise en scène de l'autorité. Les +régimes disciplinaires et totalitaires ont révélé jusqu'à l'extrême ce +qui se produit lorsque la saturation normative prétend rejoindre la +fabrication intégrale des conduites et des subjectivités. Les +démocraties providentielles, loin d'être des sorties simples hors de la +domination, ont fait apparaître d'autres modes de co-viabilité, fondés +sur les droits sociaux, la gestion statistique des risques, la +bureaucratie procédurale et l'existence, plus ou moins réelle, d'arènes +de contestation. Enfin, la configuration cybernétique a déplacé le +problème vers un régime où la norme tend à se dissoudre dans +l'environnement même de l'action, sous forme d'anticipation, de calcul, +de profilage, de modulation et d'intégration infrastructurelle. -Il importe ici de tenir ensemble deux conséquences, sans en sacrifier aucune. La première est que l’histoire régulatrice n’est pas une marche vers plus de rationalité, de transparence ou de liberté. Elle est stratifiée, bifurquante, traversée de réactivations, de survivances, d’hybridations et de bascules de scène. La seconde est que le paradigme archicratique permet néanmoins d’en lire les logiques profondes sans tomber dans le relativisme descriptif. Tout ne se vaut pas, non parce qu’une philosophie de l’histoire distribuerait des bons et des mauvais points, mais parce que les régimes diffèrent par la manière dont ils rendent possible — ou empêchent — la comparution réglée de leurs propres fondements et de leurs propres puissances. C’est pourquoi l’archicratie ne constitue pas seulement une typologie ; elle fournit aussi une mesure immanente de la tenue ou de l’oblitération des scènes régulatrices. +Il importe ici de tenir ensemble deux conséquences, sans en sacrifier +aucune. La première est que l'histoire régulatrice n'est pas une marche +vers plus de rationalité, de transparence ou de liberté. Elle est +stratifiée, bifurquante, traversée de réactivations, de survivances, +d'hybridations et de bascules de scène. La seconde est que le paradigme +archicratique permet néanmoins d'en lire les logiques profondes sans +tomber dans le relativisme descriptif. Tout ne se vaut pas, non parce +qu'une philosophie de l'histoire distribuerait des bons et des mauvais +points, mais parce que les régimes diffèrent par la manière dont ils +rendent possible — ou empêchent — la comparution réglée de leurs +propres fondements et de leurs propres puissances. C'est pourquoi +l'archicratie ne constitue pas seulement une typologie ; elle fournit +aussi une mesure immanente de la tenue ou de l'oblitération des scènes +régulatrices. -Ce point ouvre déjà sur la suite de l’essai. Car si le chapitre 2 a stabilisé le paradigme sur le plan archéologique et comparatif, il n’a pas encore répondu à toutes les questions qu’il soulève. Il a montré que les sociétés humaines inventent des formes très diverses pour rendre la co-viabilité possible ; il a montré aussi qu’aucune de ces formes n’est pure, définitive ou auto-suffisante ; il a enfin clarifié ce qu’il faut entendre rigoureusement par archicration. Mais il laisse désormais apparaître un problème plus aigu : comment évaluer, dans l’histoire concrète et surtout dans le présent, ce qui arrive lorsque ces scènes d’épreuve se fragilisent, se ferment, se ritualisent à vide ou se déplacent dans des infrastructures qui les rendent de moins en moins visibles et de moins en moins contestables ? +Ce point ouvre déjà sur la suite de l'essai. Car si le chapitre 2 a +stabilisé le paradigme sur le plan archéologique et comparatif, il n'a +pas encore répondu à toutes les questions qu'il soulève. Il a montré que +les sociétés humaines inventent des formes très diverses pour rendre la +co-viabilité possible ; il a montré aussi qu'aucune de ces formes n'est +pure, définitive ou auto-suffisante ; il a enfin clarifié ce qu'il faut +entendre rigoureusement par archicration. Mais il laisse désormais +apparaître un problème plus aigu : comment évaluer, dans l'histoire +concrète et surtout dans le présent, ce qui arrive lorsque ces scènes +d'épreuve se fragilisent, se ferment, se ritualisent à vide ou se +déplacent dans des infrastructures qui les rendent de moins en moins +visibles et de moins en moins contestables ? -Telle est la thèse la plus importante que ce chapitre nous autorise désormais à soutenir : une société ne tient pas seulement par ses croyances, par ses institutions, par sa force ou par ses savoirs, mais par la qualité de ses régimes de co-viabilité, c’est-à-dire par la manière dont elle agence des fondements recevables, des puissances opératoires et des scènes où leur confrontation peut être reprise sans destruction immédiate du monde commun. Là où cette articulation manque, il peut subsister de la domination, de l’administration, de la circulation, de la prédiction, de la croyance ou de la discipline ; mais la co-viabilité se fragilise. Là où elle se soutient, même conflictuelle, même imparfaite, même asymétrique, un monde peut encore être tenu. +Telle est la thèse la plus importante que ce chapitre nous autorise +désormais à soutenir : une société ne tient pas seulement par ses +croyances, par ses institutions, par sa force ou par ses savoirs, mais +par la qualité de ses régimes de co-viabilité, c'est-à-dire par la +manière dont elle agence des fondements recevables, des puissances +opératoires et des scènes où leur confrontation peut être reprise sans +destruction immédiate du monde commun. Là où cette articulation manque, +il peut subsister de la domination, de l'administration, de la +circulation, de la prédiction, de la croyance ou de la discipline ; mais +la co-viabilité se fragilise. Là où elle se soutient, même +conflictuelle, même imparfaite, même asymétrique, un monde peut encore +être tenu. -Le chapitre 2 s’achève ainsi sur une stabilisation forte du paradigme archicratique. Non pas sur sa clôture. Il nous donne désormais une cartographie des grandes formes de régulation, une clarification du concept d’archicration, une méthode comparative non téléologique et une hypothèse anthropologico-politique ferme : l’humain est moins d’abord un être de souveraineté qu’un être de co-viabilité problématique. Dès lors, la tâche qui s’ouvre n’est plus de multiplier les archétypes, mais de comprendre comment ces régimes se tendent, se heurtent, se décomposent ou se recomposent dans les mondes historiques et contemporains. Autrement dit : après l’archéogenèse, la critique ; après la cartographie des formes, l’examen de leurs tensions internes, de leurs seuils de rupture et de leurs devenirs. +Le chapitre 2 s'achève ainsi sur une stabilisation forte du paradigme +archicratique. Non pas sur sa clôture. Il nous donne désormais une +cartographie des grandes formes de régulation, une clarification du +concept d'archicration, une méthode comparative non téléologique et une +hypothèse anthropologico-politique ferme : l'humain est moins d'abord un +être de souveraineté qu'un être de co-viabilité problématique. Dès lors, +la tâche qui s'ouvre n'est plus de multiplier les archétypes, mais de +comprendre comment ces régimes se tendent, se heurtent, se décomposent +ou se recomposent dans les mondes historiques et contemporains. +Autrement dit : après l'archéogenèse, la critique ; après la +cartographie des formes, l'examen de leurs tensions internes, de leurs +seuils de rupture et de leurs devenirs. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-3.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-3.mdx index 10ddbfe..4782be0 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-3.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-3.mdx @@ -1,1088 +1,4947 @@ --- -title: "Chapitre 3 — Philosophies du pouvoir et archicration" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Chapitre 3 — Philosophies du pouvoir et archicration +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 40 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_3—Philosophies_du_pouvoir_et_Archicration-pour_une_topologie_differenciee_des_regimes_regulateurs-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_3—Philosophies_du_pouvoir_et_Archicration-pour_une_topologie_differenciee_des_regimes_regulateurs-version_officielle.docx --- -Ce chapitre se tient à un point nodal de notre essai-thèse : il ouvre une exploration systématique des formes conceptuelles et philosophiques à travers lesquelles le pouvoir se configure comme régime de régulation. Il ne s’agit ni de revenir sur les seuls fondements de l’autorité, ni d’interroger la légitimité politique au sens classique, ni de proposer une histoire des idées : l’ambition est structurelle, transversale et morphologique. Il s’agit d’arpenter, à même les dispositifs, les pensées, les théorisations et les expériences, les modalités différenciées par lesquelles s’instaurent, s’éprouvent et se disputent les formes de régulation du vivre-ensemble. -Dès lors, ce chapitre ne postule aucun fondement, ne cherche aucun point d’origine et ne prétend restituer aucune ontologie stable du politique. Il propose une cartographie dynamique des régimes de régulation, traversée par des formes irréductibles, non homogènes, souvent conflictuelles, parfois incompatibles, mais toujours pensées comme des configurations singulières. La régulation n’y est pas conçue comme stabilisation externe ou simple ajustement technico-fonctionnel : elle est la forme constitutive du pouvoir lui-même, ce par quoi il s’institue, se justifie, se dispute et se recompose. +Ce chapitre se tient à un point nodal de notre essai-thèse : il ouvre +une exploration systématique des formes conceptuelles et philosophiques +à travers lesquelles le pouvoir se configure comme régime de régulation. +Il ne s'agit ni de revenir sur les seuls fondements de l'autorité, ni +d'interroger la légitimité politique au sens classique, ni de proposer +une histoire des idées : l'ambition est structurelle, transversale et +morphologique. Il s'agit d'arpenter, à même les dispositifs, les +pensées, les théorisations et les expériences, les modalités +différenciées par lesquelles s'instaurent, s'éprouvent et se disputent +les formes de régulation du vivre-ensemble. -Une telle démarche impose de rompre avec toute conception unitaire ou linéaire du politique. Le pouvoir doit être saisi comme toujours déjà articulé, scénarisé et différencié en formats opératoires de régulation. Le cœur de l’enquête est donc de mettre à l’épreuve, à travers la diversité des régimes, l’hypothèse selon laquelle une scène de régulation ne devient viable — c’est-à-dire habitable, traversable, légitime et transformable — qu’à la condition d’articuler les tensions internes que nous avons identifiées par les termes arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Là où ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui met à l’épreuve cessent d’être distinguables dans leur articulation, la régulation ne disparaît pas : elle se dérègle dans sa tenue même. +Dès lors, ce chapitre ne postule aucun fondement, ne cherche aucun point +d'origine et ne prétend restituer aucune ontologie stable du politique. +Il propose une cartographie dynamique des régimes de régulation, +traversée par des formes irréductibles, non homogènes, souvent +conflictuelles, parfois incompatibles, mais toujours pensées comme des +configurations singulières. La régulation n'y est pas conçue comme +stabilisation externe ou simple ajustement technico-fonctionnel : elle +est la forme constitutive du pouvoir lui-même, ce par quoi il +s'institue, se justifie, se dispute et se recompose. -C’est en ce sens que la topologie proposée ici s’inscrit dans une perspective archicratique : non parce qu’elle appliquerait à la diversité des régimes un modèle déjà constitué, mais parce qu’elle cherche à éprouver, au contact de cette diversité même, la pertinence d’une lecture attentive à l’articulation entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Ce geste méthodologique est rendu nécessaire par l’éclatement contemporain des cadres normatifs, des repères institutionnels et des formes de légitimation. Dans un monde où les fondements se fragmentent, où les autorités se déplacent et où les processus de subjectivation se recomposent sous l’effet de mutations techniques, sociales et symboliques, le pouvoir n’apparaît plus comme un principe stable à restaurer, mais comme un ensemble de configurations instables à rendre lisibles dans leur matérialité régulatrice. +Une telle démarche impose de rompre avec toute conception unitaire ou +linéaire du politique. Le pouvoir doit être saisi comme toujours déjà +articulé, scénarisé et différencié en formats opératoires de régulation. +Le cœur de l'enquête est donc de mettre à l'épreuve, à travers la +diversité des régimes, l'hypothèse selon laquelle une scène de +régulation ne devient viable — c'est-à-dire habitable, traversable, +légitime et transformable — qu'à la condition d'articuler les tensions +internes que nous avons identifiées par les termes arcalité, cratialité +et archicration. Là où ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui met à +l'épreuve cessent d'être distinguables dans leur articulation, la +régulation ne disparaît pas : elle se dérègle dans sa tenue même. -Tel est le sol à partir duquel l’archicratie formule son hypothèse. Elle propose une structure interprétative destinée à éprouver la viabilité régulatrice des régimes, en examinant, pour chacun d’eux, si et jusqu’à quel point une lecture en termes d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration permet de rendre sa logique régulatrice plus intelligible que ne le feraient ses seules proclamations. Le chapitre adopte ainsi une lecture différentielle, transversale et falsifiable des grandes philosophies du pouvoir selon six questions directrices : quelle configuration de l’arcalité un auteur rend-il pensable ? quelle conception de la cratialité mobilise-t-il ? quel mode d’archicration, explicite ou implicite, se dégage de son œuvre ? comment la tension entre ces trois pôles est-elle pensée, neutralisée, déplacée ou cultivée ? quel degré de co-viabilité cette philosophie autorise-t-elle ? et dans quel champ de pertinence sa régulation devient-elle opératoire ? +C'est en ce sens que la topologie proposée ici s'inscrit dans une +perspective archicratique : non parce qu'elle appliquerait à la +diversité des régimes un modèle déjà constitué, mais parce qu'elle +cherche à éprouver, au contact de cette diversité même, la pertinence +d'une lecture attentive à l'articulation entre arcalité, cratialité et +archicration. Ce geste méthodologique est rendu nécessaire par +l'éclatement contemporain des cadres normatifs, des repères +institutionnels et des formes de légitimation. Dans un monde où les +fondements se fragmentent, où les autorités se déplacent et où les +processus de subjectivation se recomposent sous l'effet de mutations +techniques, sociales et symboliques, le pouvoir n'apparaît plus comme un +principe stable à restaurer, mais comme un ensemble de configurations +instables à rendre lisibles dans leur matérialité régulatrice. -La traversée s’ouvrira par les régimes fondateurs modernes de l’ordre, avant d’examiner les formes diffuses, incorporées, subjectives, dialogiques, bureaucratiques, polémiques et technico-machiniques du pouvoir. Il s’agira, à chaque fois, d’interroger moins l’origine de l’autorité que les conditions de viabilité de l’ordonnancement dans la tension. Ainsi se dessine le fil rouge du chapitre : non pas établir un modèle normatif du bon régime, ni classer hiérarchiquement les formes de gouvernement, mais demander à quelles conditions un régime régulateur permet à une société de se disputer, de se reconnaître et de se transformer sans effacer sa propre scène d’instauration. C’est pourquoi le chapitre 3 cartographie des régimes de régulation : il interroge non les justifications du pouvoir, mais les conditions de sa co-viabilité. +Tel est le sol à partir duquel l'archicratie formule son hypothèse. Elle +propose une structure interprétative destinée à éprouver la viabilité +régulatrice des régimes, en examinant, pour chacun d'eux, si et jusqu'à +quel point une lecture en termes d'arcalité, de cratialité et +d'archicration permet de rendre sa logique régulatrice plus intelligible +que ne le feraient ses seules proclamations. Le chapitre adopte ainsi +une lecture différentielle, transversale et falsifiable des grandes +philosophies du pouvoir selon six questions directrices : quelle +configuration de l'arcalité un auteur rend-il pensable ? quelle +conception de la cratialité mobilise-t-il ? quel mode d'archicration, +explicite ou implicite, se dégage de son œuvre ? comment la tension +entre ces trois pôles est-elle pensée, neutralisée, déplacée ou cultivée +? quel degré de co-viabilité cette philosophie autorise-t-elle ? et dans +quel champ de pertinence sa régulation devient-elle opératoire ? -L’enjeu n’est donc pas de substituer la grammaire archicratique aux grandes traditions du pouvoir, mais d’expliciter ce qu’elle cherche à rendre simultanément visible. Là où certaines approches privilégient le principe de légitimation, d’autres les dispositifs d’effectuation, d’autres encore la conflictualité, la délibération ou les formes de justification, le paradigme proposé ici interroge leur co-tenue : comment ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui met à l’épreuve se soutiennent-ils ensemble, se désajustent-ils, ou se neutralisent-ils réciproquement ? +La traversée s'ouvrira par les régimes fondateurs modernes de l'ordre, +avant d'examiner les formes diffuses, incorporées, subjectives, +dialogiques, bureaucratiques, polémiques et technico-machiniques du +pouvoir. Il s'agira, à chaque fois, d'interroger moins l'origine de +l'autorité que les conditions de viabilité de l'ordonnancement dans la +tension. Ainsi se dessine le fil rouge du chapitre : non pas établir un +modèle normatif du bon régime, ni classer hiérarchiquement les formes de +gouvernement, mais demander à quelles conditions un régime régulateur +permet à une société de se disputer, de se reconnaître et de se +transformer sans effacer sa propre scène d'instauration. C'est pourquoi +le chapitre 3 cartographie des régimes de régulation : il interroge non +les justifications du pouvoir, mais les conditions de sa co-viabilité. -En ce sens, l’archicratie n’a pas vocation à invalider ces traditions, mais à proposer une grammaire transversale de leur articulation partielle. +L'enjeu n'est donc pas de substituer la grammaire archicratique aux +grandes traditions du pouvoir, mais d'expliciter ce qu'elle cherche à +rendre simultanément visible. Là où certaines approches privilégient le +principe de légitimation, d'autres les dispositifs d'effectuation, +d'autres encore la conflictualité, la délibération ou les formes de +justification, le paradigme proposé ici interroge leur co-tenue : +comment ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui met à l'épreuve se +soutiennent-ils ensemble, se désajustent-ils, ou se neutralisent-ils +réciproquement ? -Cette grammaire ne vaut toutefois qu’à condition d’accepter d’être elle-même déplacée par les textes qu’elle lit : partout où la triade n’ajoute aucun gain de discernement, ou là où une tradition rend mieux visible un plan du pouvoir qu’elle laisse elle-même dans l’ombre, la lecture archicratique doit se laisser limiter, compléter ou corriger. +En ce sens, l'archicratie n'a pas vocation à invalider ces traditions, +mais à proposer une grammaire transversale de leur articulation +partielle. -## **3.1 — Régimes des philosophies fondatrices de l’ordre —** *puissance instituante* +Cette grammaire ne vaut toutefois qu'à condition d'accepter d'être +elle-même déplacée par les textes qu'elle lit : partout où la triade +n'ajoute aucun gain de discernement, ou là où une tradition rend mieux +visible un plan du pouvoir qu'elle laisse elle-même dans l'ombre, la +lecture archicratique doit se laisser limiter, compléter ou corriger. -À l’orée de la philosophie politique moderne s’impose une question matricielle : qu’est-ce qui fonde l’autorité, et à quelles conditions cette fondation peut-elle rendre le vivre-ensemble politiquement viable ? Les pensées étudiées ici — Hobbes, Locke et Rousseau — répondent toutes, chacune à leur manière, à cette exigence de structuration du commun. Mais elles le font à partir d’une arcalité fondatrice : peur primordiale, droit naturel, volonté générale. Dans chaque cas, un principe supérieur vient justifier l’ordre institué en le précédant, en l’orientant et en le contraignant. +## **3.1 — Régimes des philosophies fondatrices de l'ordre —** *puissance instituante* -Or l’exigence archicratique ne se satisfait pas de cette extériorité du principe. Elle interroge moins ce qui fonde le pouvoir que ce qui permet de le tenir sans l’absolutiser, de le moduler sans l’abolir, et de rendre la co-viabilité collective effectivement praticable. De ce point de vue, les philosophies fondatrices sont à la fois indispensables et insuffisantes : indispensables parce qu’elles posent les cadres majeurs de la pensée politique moderne ; insuffisantes parce qu’elles confondent encore la structure de la régulation avec la seule légitimation du pouvoir. +À l'orée de la philosophie politique moderne s'impose une question +matricielle : qu'est-ce qui fonde l'autorité, et à quelles conditions +cette fondation peut-elle rendre le vivre-ensemble politiquement viable +? Les pensées étudiées ici — Hobbes, Locke et Rousseau — répondent +toutes, chacune à leur manière, à cette exigence de structuration du +commun. Mais elles le font à partir d'une arcalité fondatrice : peur +primordiale, droit naturel, volonté générale. Dans chaque cas, un +principe supérieur vient justifier l'ordre institué en le précédant, en +l'orientant et en le contraignant. -Le fil conducteur de cette section est donc le suivant : comment ces philosophies conçoivent-elles la régulation du vivre-ensemble, et en quoi leur logique de fondation entrave-t-elle la possibilité d’une co-viabilité modulée ? De Hobbes à Rousseau, la peur devient blocage, le droit devient clôture, la vertu devient injonction. C’est cette tension — entre légitimation fondatrice et régulation opérante — que nous allons explorer, afin d’en dégager à la fois les limites structurelles et les seuils d’un dépassement critique. +Or l'exigence archicratique ne se satisfait pas de cette extériorité du +principe. Elle interroge moins ce qui fonde le pouvoir que ce qui permet +de le tenir sans l'absolutiser, de le moduler sans l'abolir, et de +rendre la co-viabilité collective effectivement praticable. De ce point +de vue, les philosophies fondatrices sont à la fois indispensables et +insuffisantes : indispensables parce qu'elles posent les cadres majeurs +de la pensée politique moderne ; insuffisantes parce qu'elles confondent +encore la structure de la régulation avec la seule légitimation du +pouvoir. + +Le fil conducteur de cette section est donc le suivant : comment ces +philosophies conçoivent-elles la régulation du vivre-ensemble, et en +quoi leur logique de fondation entrave-t-elle la possibilité d'une +co-viabilité modulée ? De Hobbes à Rousseau, la peur devient blocage, le +droit devient clôture, la vertu devient injonction. C'est cette tension — entre légitimation fondatrice et régulation opérante — que nous +allons explorer, afin d'en dégager à la fois les limites structurelles +et les seuils d'un dépassement critique. ### 3.1.1 — Peur, contrat et Léviathan : *une régulation par dissuasion centralisée* -3. Il est impossible de penser l’histoire des régimes politiques modernes sans affronter l’ombre monumentale de Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), figure matricielle de la modernité politique, dont l’œuvre *Leviathan* (1651) constitue un acte inaugural dans l’édification théorique du pouvoir souverain. Mais ce que l’on nomme trop rapidement « contractualisme hobbesien » dissimule en réalité une conception profondément ambivalente de la régulation politique, à la fois radicalement novatrice dans sa formalisation anthropologique du pouvoir, et tragiquement mutilante dans son traitement univoque de la conflictualité. L’approche hobbesienne constitue à ce titre un archétype parfait — quoique limitatif — d’un régime de légitimation fondatrice ancré dans la dissuasion centralisée. Il est donc indispensable d’en déplier les prémisses, la structure, les enjeux, et les apories, pour mieux en situer la portée et la limitation au regard du paradigme archicratique. +Il est impossible de penser l'histoire des régimes politiques modernes +sans affronter l'ombre monumentale de Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), figure +matricielle de la modernité politique, dont l'œuvre *Leviathan* (1651) +constitue un acte inaugural dans l'édification théorique du pouvoir +souverain. Mais ce que l'on nomme trop rapidement « contractualisme +hobbesien » dissimule en réalité une conception profondément ambivalente +de la régulation politique, à la fois radicalement novatrice dans sa +formalisation anthropologique du pouvoir, et tragiquement mutilante dans +son traitement univoque de la conflictualité. L'approche hobbesienne +constitue à ce titre un archétype parfait — quoique limitatif — d'un +régime de légitimation fondatrice ancré dans la dissuasion centralisée. +Il est donc indispensable d'en déplier les prémisses, la structure, les +enjeux, et les apories, pour mieux en situer la portée et la limitation +au regard du paradigme archicratique. -4. La pensée de Hobbes se fonde sur une hypothèse anthropologique qu’il faut comprendre dans toute sa brutalité : *l’état de nature*, loin d’être un idéal perdu ou une condition pré-politique neutre, est une condition de guerre de chacun contre chacun (*bellum omnium contra omnes*), où l’homme est un loup pour l’homme (*homo homini lupus*). L’élément moteur de cette configuration anthropologique n’est ni la haine, ni l’instinct, ni même la volonté de domination — mais la peur, cette passion primaire et primordiale, commune à tous, et qui révèle, selon Hobbes, la vulnérabilité constitutive des êtres humains livrés à eux-mêmes. +La pensée de Hobbes se fonde sur une hypothèse anthropologique qu'il +faut comprendre dans toute sa brutalité : *l'état de nature*, loin +d'être un idéal perdu ou une condition pré-politique neutre, est une +condition de guerre de chacun contre chacun (*bellum omnium contra +omnes*), où l'homme est un loup pour l'homme (*homo homini lupus*). +L'élément moteur de cette configuration anthropologique n'est ni la +haine, ni l'instinct, ni même la volonté de domination — mais la peur, +cette passion primaire et primordiale, commune à tous, et qui révèle, +selon Hobbes, la vulnérabilité constitutive des êtres humains livrés à +eux-mêmes. -5. C’est dans cette peur partagée que naît la possibilité d’un contrat. Non pas un contrat fondé sur la vertu ou la raison morale, mais un contrat de renoncement réciproque à l’usage illimité de sa liberté naturelle, au profit d’un tiers désigné — le souverain — à qui chacun transfère, en bloc, son droit de se défendre lui-même. Ce transfert est irréversible, indécomposable, sans appel. Il s’agit d’une autorité absolue légitimée par le besoin de sécurité, et fondée sur un acte fondateur — le pacte de soumission — qui ne saurait être dissous sans retomber dans la barbarie. +C'est dans cette peur partagée que naît la possibilité d'un contrat. Non +pas un contrat fondé sur la vertu ou la raison morale, mais un contrat +de renoncement réciproque à l'usage illimité de sa liberté naturelle, au +profit d'un tiers désigné — le souverain — à qui chacun transfère, +en bloc, son droit de se défendre lui-même. Ce transfert est +irréversible, indécomposable, sans appel. Il s'agit d'une autorité +absolue légitimée par le besoin de sécurité, et fondée sur un acte +fondateur — le pacte de soumission — qui ne saurait être dissous +sans retomber dans la barbarie. -6. La régulation, dans ce cadre, n’est donc ni démocratique, ni délibérative, mais centralisée, unilatérale, verticale et dissuasive. Elle repose non pas sur une co-viabilité dialoguée, mais sur une dissuasion systémique. La paix sociale est le résultat de la crainte inspirée par un pouvoir supérieur qui, tel le Léviathan biblique, incarne une figure surhumaine, presque monstrueuse, mais garante de la stabilité. +La régulation, dans ce cadre, n'est donc ni démocratique, ni +délibérative, mais centralisée, unilatérale, verticale et dissuasive. +Elle repose non pas sur une co-viabilité dialoguée, mais sur une +dissuasion systémique. La paix sociale est le résultat de la crainte +inspirée par un pouvoir supérieur qui, tel le Léviathan biblique, +incarne une figure surhumaine, presque monstrueuse, mais garante de la +stabilité. -« La seule façon d’ériger un pouvoir commun, (…) capable de défendre les hommes contre l’invasion des étrangers, et des torts qu’ils peuvent se faire les uns aux autres (...) est de rassembler tout leur pouvoir et toute leur force sur un seul homme, ou sur une seule assemblée d'hommes, qui puisse réduire toutes leurs volontés, à la majorité des voix, à une seule volonté (…) Cela fait, la multitude ainsi unie en une seule personne est appelée une république, en latin civitas. C'est là, la génération de ce grand Léviathan. » (*Leviathan*, chap. XVII, 1651) +« La seule façon d'ériger un pouvoir commun, (...) capable de défendre +les hommes contre l'invasion des étrangers, et des torts qu'ils peuvent +se faire les uns aux autres (...) est de rassembler tout leur pouvoir et +toute leur force sur un seul homme, ou sur une seule assemblée d'hommes, +qui puisse réduire toutes leurs volontés, à la majorité des voix, à une +seule volonté (...) Cela fait, la multitude ainsi unie en une seule +personne est appelée une république, en latin civitas. C'est là, la +génération de ce grand Léviathan. » (*Leviathan*, chap. XVII, 1651) -7. Ce passage montre bien que, pour Hobbes, le politique n’est pas d’abord un espace d’action conjointe, mais un mécanisme de neutralisation des violences. Le Léviathan n’est pas une institution morale ou un dispositif participatif, mais une machine de régulation coercitive, un automate symbolique de maintien de l’ordre. +Ce passage montre bien que, pour Hobbes, le politique n'est pas d'abord +un espace d'action conjointe, mais un mécanisme de neutralisation des +violences. Le Léviathan n'est pas une institution morale ou un +dispositif participatif, mais une machine de régulation coercitive, un +automate symbolique de maintien de l'ordre. -8. Il faut alors mesurer ce que le modèle hobbesien rend impossible. La régulation n’y est ni modulable, ni différenciable, ni stratifiée : elle est univoque, centralisée, homogénéisante. La souveraineté ne tolère ni division, ni partage, ni négociation ; toute pluralisation du pouvoir y apparaît comme une menace pour l’unité fondatrice, donc pour la paix elle-même. Il n’existe dès lors ni champ du dissensus légitime, ni dispositif d’ajustement réciproque, ni véritable scène d’épreuve. Le souverain concentre les fonctions normatives, exécutives et judiciaires dans une figure de pouvoir totalisante qui neutralise la conflictualité au lieu de l’intégrer. +Il faut alors mesurer ce que le modèle hobbesien rend impossible. La +régulation n'y est ni modulable, ni différenciable, ni stratifiée : elle +est univoque, centralisée, homogénéisante. La souveraineté ne tolère ni +division, ni partage, ni négociation ; toute pluralisation du pouvoir y +apparaît comme une menace pour l'unité fondatrice, donc pour la paix +elle-même. Il n'existe dès lors ni champ du dissensus légitime, ni +dispositif d'ajustement réciproque, ni véritable scène d'épreuve. Le +souverain concentre les fonctions normatives, exécutives et judiciaires +dans une figure de pouvoir totalisante qui neutralise la conflictualité +au lieu de l'intégrer. -Du point de vue archicratique, cette construction échoue à penser la régulation comme processus. Elle fonde l’autorité, mais sans la moduler ; elle assure la sécurité, mais non la viabilité ; elle stabilise, mais au prix d’une dé-liaison structurelle du social, où les individus ne se reconnaissent plus comme cohabitants d’un monde commun, mais comme menaces à contenir. En ce sens, l’échec hobbesien est instructif : il révèle qu’aucune régulation viable ne peut se réduire à la dissuasion verticale d’un principe centralisé. +Du point de vue archicratique, cette construction échoue à penser la +régulation comme processus. Elle fonde l'autorité, mais sans la moduler +; elle assure la sécurité, mais non la viabilité ; elle stabilise, mais +au prix d'une dé-liaison structurelle du social, où les individus ne se +reconnaissent plus comme cohabitants d'un monde commun, mais comme +menaces à contenir. En ce sens, l'échec hobbesien est instructif : il +révèle qu'aucune régulation viable ne peut se réduire à la dissuasion +verticale d'un principe centralisé. -### 3.1.2 — Droit naturel et propriété : *une régulation par l’encadrement libéral* +### 3.1.2 — Droit naturel et propriété : *une régulation par l'encadrement libéral* -9. Avec John Locke (1632–1704), un basculement décisif s’opère dans l’histoire des régimes de légitimation politique : là où Hobbes construisait l’ordre à partir de la peur et de la cession absolue de droits à une autorité centralisée, Locke inaugure une conception du pouvoir fondée sur la conservation, la limitation et la contractualisation équilibrée des droits fondamentaux. Le pouvoir politique n’est plus un Léviathan surplombant, mais un organe subordonné à des principes supérieurs : la *loi naturelle*, le *droit de propriété*, et le *consentement des gouvernés*. Cette architecture libérale — en apparence plus souple, plus humaniste, plus équilibrée — repose néanmoins sur un régime de régulation que nous qualifierons d’encadrement normatif minimaliste, échappant autant à la régulation par tension qu’à la structuration archicratique. +Avec John Locke (1632–1704), un basculement décisif s'opère dans +l'histoire des régimes de légitimation politique : là où Hobbes +construisait l'ordre à partir de la peur et de la cession absolue de +droits à une autorité centralisée, Locke inaugure une conception du +pouvoir fondée sur la conservation, la limitation et la +contractualisation équilibrée des droits fondamentaux. Le pouvoir +politique n'est plus un Léviathan surplombant, mais un organe subordonné +à des principes supérieurs : la *loi naturelle*, le *droit de +propriété*, et le *consentement des gouvernés*. Cette architecture +libérale — en apparence plus souple, plus humaniste, plus équilibrée — repose néanmoins sur un régime de régulation que nous qualifierons +d'encadrement normatif minimaliste, échappant autant à la régulation par +tension qu'à la structuration archicratique. -10. À la différence de Hobbes, Locke ne conçoit pas l’état de nature comme une guerre permanente de chacun contre chacun. Il y voit plutôt une condition originelle d’égalité, de liberté et de rationalité limitée, dans laquelle les individus jouissent naturellement de droits à la vie, à la liberté, et surtout à la propriété. Cependant, cette situation demeure instable car sans juge commun : en cas de litige, chacun reste juge et partie, ce qui engendre inévitablement l’injustice et la spirale de la vengeance. +À la différence de Hobbes, Locke ne conçoit pas l'état de nature comme +une guerre permanente de chacun contre chacun. Il y voit plutôt une +condition originelle d'égalité, de liberté et de rationalité limitée, +dans laquelle les individus jouissent naturellement de droits à la vie, +à la liberté, et surtout à la propriété. Cependant, cette situation +demeure instable car sans juge commun : en cas de litige, chacun reste +juge et partie, ce qui engendre inévitablement l'injustice et la spirale +de la vengeance. -11. Dès lors, le contrat social lockéen vise moins à instituer l’autorité qu’à en restreindre l’arbitraire. Il ne s’agit pas de remettre ses droits au souverain, mais de confier à un pouvoir public l’autorité nécessaire pour protéger les droits naturels déjà existants. Le gouvernement devient ainsi un mandataire, et non un seigneur. C’est la condition sine qua non de sa légitimité. +Dès lors, le contrat social lockéen vise moins à instituer l'autorité +qu'à en restreindre l'arbitraire. Il ne s'agit pas de remettre ses +droits au souverain, mais de confier à un pouvoir public l'autorité +nécessaire pour protéger les droits naturels déjà existants. Le +gouvernement devient ainsi un mandataire, et non un seigneur. C'est la +condition sine qua non de sa légitimité. -« C'est pourquoi, la plus grande et la principale fin que se proposent les hommes, lorsqu'ils s'unissent en communauté et se soumettent à un gouvernement, c'est de conserver leurs propriétés, pour la conservation desquelles bien des choses manquent dans l'état de nature. » (*Second traité de gouvernement*, §124) +« C'est pourquoi, la plus grande et la principale fin que se proposent +les hommes, lorsqu'ils s'unissent en communauté et se soumettent à un +gouvernement, c'est de conserver leurs propriétés, pour la conservation +desquelles bien des choses manquent dans l'état de nature. » (*Second +traité de gouvernement*, §124) -12. Ce passage condense nettement la structure normative de la régulation chez Locke : elle est instrumentale, protectrice, subordonnée. Le politique n’a pas d’autonomie propre ; il n’est que l’émanation d’un pacte visant la protection des biens et des droits individuels. Il ne produit pas une régulation dynamique ; il fixe des limites, trace des bornes, encadre les excès. +Ce passage condense nettement la structure normative de la régulation +chez Locke : elle est instrumentale, protectrice, subordonnée. Le +politique n'a pas d'autonomie propre ; il n'est que l'émanation d'un +pacte visant la protection des biens et des droits individuels. Il ne +produit pas une régulation dynamique ; il fixe des limites, trace des +bornes, encadre les excès. -13. Le rôle fondateur de la propriété dans le système lockéen est central : elle constitue à la fois le fondement, la finalité et la mesure de la régulation politique. Pour Locke, la propriété naît dès l’état de nature, par le travail individuel appliqué à la matière. Elle précède donc l’institution politique, et impose des limites à celle-ci. La propriété devient ainsi un opérateur de régulation négative : le pouvoir ne peut ni l’abolir, ni l’outrepasser, sans se délégitimer. +Le rôle fondateur de la propriété dans le système lockéen est central : +elle constitue à la fois le fondement, la finalité et la mesure de la +régulation politique. Pour Locke, la propriété naît dès l'état de +nature, par le travail individuel appliqué à la matière. Elle précède +donc l'institution politique, et impose des limites à celle-ci. La +propriété devient ainsi un opérateur de régulation négative : le pouvoir +ne peut ni l'abolir, ni l'outrepasser, sans se délégitimer. -14. Mais cette configuration introduit un biais important : la régulation lockéenne demeure statique, prévisible et orientée vers la seule protection de l’acquis. L’ordre social y est pensé comme stabilité d’un cadre, non comme plasticité d’une composition. La co-viabilité n’y devient pas un horizon actif, mais l’effet supposé de la garantie des droits ; or ce postulat laisse hors champ les asymétries de pouvoir, les inégalités structurelles et les formes silencieuses de domination que peut elle-même produire la propriété. +Mais cette configuration introduit un biais important : la régulation +lockéenne demeure statique, prévisible et orientée vers la seule +protection de l'acquis. L'ordre social y est pensé comme stabilité d'un +cadre, non comme plasticité d'une composition. La co-viabilité n'y +devient pas un horizon actif, mais l'effet supposé de la garantie des +droits ; or ce postulat laisse hors champ les asymétries de pouvoir, les +inégalités structurelles et les formes silencieuses de domination que +peut elle-même produire la propriété. -Replacé dans la grille archicratique, le modèle lockéen apparaît ainsi doublement limité : il refuse la centralisation hobbesienne, mais ne parvient pas pour autant à élaborer une pensée active, différenciée et ajustable de la régulation. Sa normativité demeure formelle, juridique et abstraite ; elle borne le pouvoir sans l’orchestrer, protège sans moduler, garantit sans articuler les tensions. C’est pourquoi le libéralisme lockéen engendre moins une régulation viable qu’une dépolitisation implicite de la régulation elle-même. +Replacé dans la grille archicratique, le modèle lockéen apparaît ainsi +doublement limité : il refuse la centralisation hobbesienne, mais ne +parvient pas pour autant à élaborer une pensée active, différenciée et +ajustable de la régulation. Sa normativité demeure formelle, juridique +et abstraite ; elle borne le pouvoir sans l'orchestrer, protège sans +moduler, garantit sans articuler les tensions. C'est pourquoi le +libéralisme lockéen engendre moins une régulation viable qu'une +dépolitisation implicite de la régulation elle-même. ### 3.1.3 — Volonté générale et législation de soi : *une auto-régulation vertueuse* -15. La modernité politique opère une inflexion décisive avec Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), en rupture aussi bien avec la verticalité dissuasive de Hobbes qu’avec l’encadrement libéral de Locke. Dans le *Contrat social* (1762), Rousseau ne se contente pas de repenser les fondements de la souveraineté : il cherche à reconfigurer l’être même du collectif, en instituant un principe politique à la fois immanent, éthique, totalisant et normatif. Là où Hobbes séparait l’individu du souverain, et Locke l’enveloppait dans le droit, Rousseau identifie dans la *volonté générale* le lieu même de la légitimité — une volonté qui est à la fois fondatrice, instituante et régulatrice, car c’est elle qui *se donne à elle-même ses propres lois*. +La modernité politique opère une inflexion décisive avec Jean-Jacques +Rousseau (1712–1778), en rupture aussi bien avec la verticalité +dissuasive de Hobbes qu'avec l'encadrement libéral de Locke. Dans le +*Contrat social* (1762), Rousseau ne se contente pas de repenser les +fondements de la souveraineté : il cherche à reconfigurer l'être même du +collectif, en instituant un principe politique à la fois immanent, +éthique, totalisant et normatif. Là où Hobbes séparait l'individu du +souverain, et Locke l'enveloppait dans le droit, Rousseau identifie dans +la *volonté générale* le lieu même de la légitimité — une volonté qui +est à la fois fondatrice, instituante et régulatrice, car c'est elle qui +*se donne à elle-même ses propres lois*. -16. C’est en cela que la pensée rousseauiste inaugure une modalité originale d’arcalité auto-référente — une forme de légitimation fondée non sur la transcendance, la propriété ou l’autorité extérieure, mais sur *l’internalisation du pouvoir par le peuple lui-même*. Cette tension entre autonomie collective et régulation normative constitue un terrain privilégié pour la critique archicratique, car elle engage le paradoxe fondamental de toute société humaine : *comment articuler liberté et obligation sans recourir ni à la force ni à l’hétéronomie ?* +C'est en cela que la pensée rousseauiste inaugure une modalité originale +d'arcalité auto-référente — une forme de légitimation fondée non sur +la transcendance, la propriété ou l'autorité extérieure, mais sur +*l'internalisation du pouvoir par le peuple lui-même*. Cette tension +entre autonomie collective et régulation normative constitue un terrain +privilégié pour la critique archicratique, car elle engage le paradoxe +fondamental de toute société humaine : *comment articuler liberté et +obligation sans recourir ni à la force ni à l'hétéronomie ?* -17. Chez Rousseau, l’état de nature n’est pas un enfer hobbesien, ni un paradis harmonieux : c’est une condition de liberté sans solidarité, d’indépendance sans société. Le contrat social devient alors le moment fondateur par lequel les individus acceptent, collectivement, de *se transformer eux-mêmes en peuple*, c’est-à-dire en sujet commun capable de vouloir et de se donner la loi. Il ne s’agit pas d’un pacte de sécurité ou de protection des biens, mais d’un acte de transfiguration politique : la fondation d’un corps collectif par l’adhésion libre à une volonté générale. +Chez Rousseau, l'état de nature n'est pas un enfer hobbesien, ni un +paradis harmonieux : c'est une condition de liberté sans solidarité, +d'indépendance sans société. Le contrat social devient alors le moment +fondateur par lequel les individus acceptent, collectivement, de *se +transformer eux-mêmes en peuple*, c'est-à-dire en sujet commun capable +de vouloir et de se donner la loi. Il ne s'agit pas d'un pacte de +sécurité ou de protection des biens, mais d'un acte de transfiguration +politique : la fondation d'un corps collectif par l'adhésion libre à une +volonté générale. -« Chacun de nous met en commun sa personne et toute sa puissance sous la suprême direction de la volonté générale; et nous recevons en corps chaque membre comme partie indivisible du tout. » (*Du Contrat social*, I, 6). +« Chacun de nous met en commun sa personne et toute sa puissance sous la +suprême direction de la volonté générale; et nous recevons en corps +chaque membre comme partie indivisible du tout. » (*Du Contrat social*, +I, 6). -18. Cet acte d’auto-institution, tout à fait singulier dans l’histoire de la pensée politique, confère à la volonté générale un statut de source normative originaire. Elle n’est pas l’agrégat des volontés particulières, ni la simple somme des intérêts individuels. Elle est ce que le collectif peut vouloir pour sa propre conservation, son unité et son bien commun. Elle devient donc la forme même de l’arcalité démocratique — c’est-à-dire une légitimation interne, autoréférée, non hétéronome. +Cet acte d'auto-institution, tout à fait singulier dans l'histoire de la +pensée politique, confère à la volonté générale un statut de source +normative originaire. Elle n'est pas l'agrégat des volontés +particulières, ni la simple somme des intérêts individuels. Elle est ce +que le collectif peut vouloir pour sa propre conservation, son unité et +son bien commun. Elle devient donc la forme même de l'arcalité +démocratique — c'est-à-dire une légitimation interne, autoréférée, non +hétéronome. -19. Mais une telle conception, si elle prétend résoudre le problème de la légitimité par l’auto-législation, n’élucide pas encore le régime de régulation qu’elle implique. La volonté générale dit ce qu’il faut vouloir, mais ne dit pas *comment* faire vivre cette volonté dans la conflictualité des situations, des différences, des altérités. +Mais une telle conception, si elle prétend résoudre le problème de la +légitimité par l'auto-législation, n'élucide pas encore le régime de +régulation qu'elle implique. La volonté générale dit ce qu'il faut +vouloir, mais ne dit pas *comment* faire vivre cette volonté dans la +conflictualité des situations, des différences, des altérités. -20. Le projet rousseauiste repose donc sur un postulat éthique fort : la vertu du citoyen. La société politique n’est viable, selon Rousseau, que si chaque citoyen est animé d’un amour sincère du bien commun, d’un attachement à la loi, d’une disposition à sacrifier son intérêt particulier à l’intérêt général. C’est par la vertu que la volonté générale peut s’incarner sans coercition. D’où le rôle crucial de l’éducation, de la religion civile, de la patrie, et des rites collectifs dans la formation du citoyen. +Le projet rousseauiste repose donc sur un postulat éthique fort : la +vertu du citoyen. La société politique n'est viable, selon Rousseau, que +si chaque citoyen est animé d'un amour sincère du bien commun, d'un +attachement à la loi, d'une disposition à sacrifier son intérêt +particulier à l'intérêt général. C'est par la vertu que la volonté +générale peut s'incarner sans coercition. D'où le rôle crucial de +l'éducation, de la religion civile, de la patrie, et des rites +collectifs dans la formation du citoyen. -« Il faudrait des dieux pour donner des lois aux hommes. » (*Du Contrat social*, II, chapitre 7) +« Il faudrait des dieux pour donner des lois aux hommes. » (*Du Contrat +social*, II, chapitre 7) -21. Ce recours à une forme de *transcendance civique* — qu’elle soit morale, éducative ou symbolique — révèle la fragilité régulatoire du modèle rousseauiste. Car si la vertu est la condition de la coïncidence entre liberté et loi, entre volonté individuelle et volonté générale, alors la régulation repose sur une intériorisation totale de la norme, au prix d’un certain silence de la pluralité, voire d’une exclusion implicite des dissidences. +Ce recours à une forme de *transcendance civique* — qu'elle soit +morale, éducative ou symbolique — révèle la fragilité régulatoire du +modèle rousseauiste. Car si la vertu est la condition de la coïncidence +entre liberté et loi, entre volonté individuelle et volonté générale, +alors la régulation repose sur une intériorisation totale de la norme, +au prix d'un certain silence de la pluralité, voire d'une exclusion +implicite des dissidences. -22. La volonté générale ne souffre pas d’alternative légitime : elle est tenue pour le seul lieu du juste, de sorte que toute volonté particulière qui s’en écarte tend à être réputée erronée, voire illégitime. La régulation se trouve alors absorbée par l’institution elle-même : il ne reste plus de place pour une médiation souple, différenciée, ajustable aux conflits de situation, aux écarts de perspective ou aux pluralités irréductibles. +La volonté générale ne souffre pas d'alternative légitime : elle est +tenue pour le seul lieu du juste, de sorte que toute volonté +particulière qui s'en écarte tend à être réputée erronée, voire +illégitime. La régulation se trouve alors absorbée par l'institution +elle-même : il ne reste plus de place pour une médiation souple, +différenciée, ajustable aux conflits de situation, aux écarts de +perspective ou aux pluralités irréductibles. -Du point de vue archicratique, c’est là la limite majeure du modèle rousseauiste. Sa puissance est réelle : il fonde l’idée républicaine moderne, pense le peuple comme sujet et relie démocratie et autonomie. Mais cette même puissance se retourne en clôture normative dès lors qu’elle ne parvient plus à penser le conflit comme ressource, le dissensus comme moteur, ni la régulation comme tension modulante entre fondation et puissance. Rousseau institue ; il ne régule pas encore. +Du point de vue archicratique, c'est là la limite majeure du modèle +rousseauiste. Sa puissance est réelle : il fonde l'idée républicaine +moderne, pense le peuple comme sujet et relie démocratie et autonomie. +Mais cette même puissance se retourne en clôture normative dès lors +qu'elle ne parvient plus à penser le conflit comme ressource, le +dissensus comme moteur, ni la régulation comme tension modulante entre +fondation et puissance. Rousseau institue ; il ne régule pas encore. -23. De Hobbes à Rousseau, ce premier ensemble doctrinal pose les prémices d’un questionnement régulateur fondamental, sans parvenir encore à penser la régulation comme tension productive et médiatisée de co-viabilité. Chacune de ces philosophies cherche à stabiliser l’ordre social à partir d’une arcalité fondatrice — le contrat chez Hobbes et Locke, la volonté générale chez Rousseau — mais aucune ne parvient à articuler pleinement le principe et la puissance dans un régime modulable de régulation. Chez Hobbes, la cratialité est coercitive et l’archicration absente ; chez Locke, elle est juridiquement encadrée mais politiquement inerte ; chez Rousseau, elle se trouve absorbée dans la clôture normative de la loi. +De Hobbes à Rousseau, ce premier ensemble doctrinal pose les prémices +d'un questionnement régulateur fondamental, sans parvenir encore à +penser la régulation comme tension productive et médiatisée de +co-viabilité. Chacune de ces philosophies cherche à stabiliser l'ordre +social à partir d'une arcalité fondatrice — le contrat chez Hobbes et +Locke, la volonté générale chez Rousseau — mais aucune ne parvient à +articuler pleinement le principe et la puissance dans un régime +modulable de régulation. Chez Hobbes, la cratialité est coercitive et +l'archicration absente ; chez Locke, elle est juridiquement encadrée +mais politiquement inerte ; chez Rousseau, elle se trouve absorbée dans +la clôture normative de la loi. -Autrement dit, ces pensées fondatrices élaborent des formes d’ordre, parfois inventives, parfois autoritaires, mais échouent encore à rendre pensable une cratialité modulable, située et mise en tension avec l’arcalité. L’Archicratie y demeure absente, empêchée ou invisible. C’est pourquoi il faut désormais passer à un second registre : celui des régimes de régulation diffuse, immanente et incorporée, où la médiation n’est plus fondatrice, mais spatialisée, disciplinarisée et dispersée. +Autrement dit, ces pensées fondatrices élaborent des formes d'ordre, +parfois inventives, parfois autoritaires, mais échouent encore à rendre +pensable une cratialité modulable, située et mise en tension avec +l'arcalité. L'Archicratie y demeure absente, empêchée ou invisible. +C'est pourquoi il faut désormais passer à un second registre : celui des +régimes de régulation diffuse, immanente et incorporée, où la médiation +n'est plus fondatrice, mais spatialisée, disciplinarisée et dispersée. -## **3.2 — Régimes de la diffusion, du silence et de l’incorporation —** *puissance immanente* +## **3.2 — Régimes de la diffusion, du silence et de l'incorporation —** *puissance immanente* -24. Si les régimes de légitimation fondatrice étudiés précédemment plaçaient au centre de la régulation une arcalité explicite — souveraineté, contrat, volonté générale, principe moral ou juridique —, la présente section examine un autre régime du pouvoir : celui où la régulation ne procède plus d’un commencement identifiable, mais de formes de diffusion, de dispersion et d’incorporation. Le pouvoir n’y apparaît plus seulement comme acte d’imposition ; il devient milieu, habitus, dispositif, exception, vibration affective — bref, forme d’ordonnancement sans ordonnateur pleinement visible. +Si les régimes de légitimation fondatrice étudiés précédemment plaçaient +au centre de la régulation une arcalité explicite — souveraineté, +contrat, volonté générale, principe moral ou juridique —, la présente +section examine un autre régime du pouvoir : celui où la régulation ne +procède plus d'un commencement identifiable, mais de formes de +diffusion, de dispersion et d'incorporation. Le pouvoir n'y apparaît +plus seulement comme acte d'imposition ; il devient milieu, habitus, +dispositif, exception, vibration affective — bref, forme +d'ordonnancement sans ordonnateur pleinement visible. -Avec Bourdieu, Foucault, Schmitt et Rosa — et, en amont, Mauss —, la régulation se déplace hors des centres explicites de légitimation. Le sujet régulateur s’y dissout dans des logiques structurelles ; la normativité se désinstitutionnalise ; le pouvoir devient spatial, technique, infralinguistique, rythmique. La question archicratique s’en trouve profondément reconfigurée : si l’archicration suppose un agencement tensionnel entre arkhê et krateîn, encore faut-il que ces pôles demeurent pensables. Or ici, l’autorité devient nébuleuse et l’exercice du pouvoir tend à se confondre avec des flux, des dispositions ou des dispositifs sans scène explicite. +Avec Bourdieu, Foucault, Schmitt et Rosa — et, en amont, Mauss —, la +régulation se déplace hors des centres explicites de légitimation. Le +sujet régulateur s'y dissout dans des logiques structurelles ; la +normativité se désinstitutionnalise ; le pouvoir devient spatial, +technique, infralinguistique, rythmique. La question archicratique s'en +trouve profondément reconfigurée : si l'archicration suppose un +agencement tensionnel entre arkhê et krateîn, encore faut-il que ces +pôles demeurent pensables. Or ici, l'autorité devient nébuleuse et +l'exercice du pouvoir tend à se confondre avec des flux, des +dispositions ou des dispositifs sans scène explicite. -Ces philosophies rendent ainsi pensable une régulation immanente, souvent efficace, mais rarement articulée. L’archicratie y demeure latente : présente dans les plis du social, mais empêchée par l’absence de médiation explicite, de tension formalisée et de véritable scène d’épreuve. C’est cette cartographie implicite de l’archicration diffuse que nous allons examiner, afin d’en mesurer à la fois la puissance, les limites et les écarts à l’égard d’un paradigme régulateur pleinement opératoire. +Ces philosophies rendent ainsi pensable une régulation immanente, +souvent efficace, mais rarement articulée. L'archicratie y demeure +latente : présente dans les plis du social, mais empêchée par l'absence +de médiation explicite, de tension formalisée et de véritable scène +d'épreuve. C'est cette cartographie implicite de l'archicration diffuse +que nous allons examiner, afin d'en mesurer à la fois la puissance, les +limites et les écarts à l'égard d'un paradigme régulateur pleinement +opératoire. ### **3.2.1 — Le *fait social total* comme matrice incorporée : *une régulation par le don*** -Avant Bourdieu, Foucault, Schmitt ou Rosa — et bien en-deçà des conceptualisations philosophiques modernes du pouvoir, souvent arc-boutées sur l’institution, la souveraineté ou la rationalisation —, c’est dans l’œuvre fondatrice de Marcel Mauss que se dessine peut-être l’une des premières esquisses d’une régulation immanente, incorporée, non instituée mais efficace. *L’Essai sur le don* (1925) n’est pas seulement un texte anthropologique : il constitue l’une des toutes premières modélisations systémiques d’une régulation sociale sans État, sans contrat formel, sans autorité juridique explicite, mais opérante, stable, durable. C’est en ce sens un texte paradigmatique, non seulement pour penser la logique du lien, mais aussi pour fonder une archéogénéalogie du paradigme archicratique. +Avant Bourdieu, Foucault, Schmitt ou Rosa — et bien en-deçà des +conceptualisations philosophiques modernes du pouvoir, souvent +arc-boutées sur l'institution, la souveraineté ou la rationalisation +—, c'est dans l'œuvre fondatrice de Marcel Mauss que se dessine +peut-être l'une des premières esquisses d'une régulation immanente, +incorporée, non instituée mais efficace. *L'Essai sur le don* (1925) +n'est pas seulement un texte anthropologique : il constitue l'une des +toutes premières modélisations systémiques d'une régulation sociale sans +État, sans contrat formel, sans autorité juridique explicite, mais +opérante, stable, durable. C'est en ce sens un texte paradigmatique, non +seulement pour penser la logique du lien, mais aussi pour fonder une +archéogénéalogie du paradigme archicratique. -Mauss, par son concept de *fait social total*, décrit une régulation où l’ensemble du social — juridique, religieux, économique, esthétique, affectif, symbolique — est mobilisé dans un agencement d’obligations réciproques qui produit du lien, de la stabilité, de l’équilibre. Il écrit dès l’introduction : « Ces institutions ont cela de commun qu’elles expriment à la fois toutes les institutions. Ce sont, dans un sens, des faits sociaux totaux » (*Essai sur le don*, 1925, p. 4). Le don, dans les sociétés dites « primitives », n’est ni altruisme désintéressé, ni pure transaction économique : il est structure de régulation, dispositif de coordination sociale, configuration normative sans institution centralisée. Il incarne une archicration sans État, mais non sans règle ; une régulation sans souverain, mais non sans structuration ; une organisation sociale sans *arkhê* explicite, mais non sans formes d’autorité incorporées. +Mauss, par son concept de *fait social total*, décrit une régulation où +l'ensemble du social — juridique, religieux, économique, esthétique, +affectif, symbolique — est mobilisé dans un agencement d'obligations +réciproques qui produit du lien, de la stabilité, de l'équilibre. Il +écrit dès l'introduction : « Ces institutions ont cela de commun +qu'elles expriment à la fois toutes les institutions. Ce sont, dans un +sens, des faits sociaux totaux » (*Essai sur le don*, 1925, p. 4). Le +don, dans les sociétés dites « primitives », n'est ni altruisme +désintéressé, ni pure transaction économique : il est structure de +régulation, dispositif de coordination sociale, configuration normative +sans institution centralisée. Il incarne une archicration sans État, +mais non sans règle ; une régulation sans souverain, mais non sans +structuration ; une organisation sociale sans *arkhê* explicite, mais +non sans formes d'autorité incorporées. -Mais ce don n’est pas une simple circulation d’objets ou de services : il est animé, traversé, habité par une force que Mauss, dans le sillage des traditions polynésiennes et mélanésiennes, nomme *mana*. Le *mana* n’est pas un attribut personnel, ni un principe transcendant : c’est une *puissance d’agir impalpable*, *invisible mais agissante*, qui s’attache à l’objet donné et en fait un opérateur symbolique. L’objet donné n’est jamais neutre : il contient, véhicule, manifeste une charge, un prestige, une autorité non verbalisée mais contraignante. Mauss écrit : +Mais ce don n'est pas une simple circulation d'objets ou de services : +il est animé, traversé, habité par une force que Mauss, dans le sillage +des traditions polynésiennes et mélanésiennes, nomme *mana*. Le *mana* +n'est pas un attribut personnel, ni un principe transcendant : c'est une +*puissance d'agir impalpable*, *invisible mais agissante*, qui s'attache +à l'objet donné et en fait un opérateur symbolique. L'objet donné n'est +jamais neutre : il contient, véhicule, manifeste une charge, un +prestige, une autorité non verbalisée mais contraignante. Mauss écrit : -« Le *mana* polynésien, lui-même, symbolise non seulement la force magique de chaque être, mais aussi son honneur, et l'une des meilleures traductions de ce mot, c'est *autorité*, *richesse*. » (*Essai sur le don*, chap. II) +« Le *mana* polynésien, lui-même, symbolise non seulement la force +magique de chaque être, mais aussi son honneur, et l'une des meilleures +traductions de ce mot, c'est *autorité*, *richesse*. » (*Essai sur le +don*, chap. II) -Le *mana* est donc une intensité cratiale symboliquement incorporée, une énergie régulatrice sans corps, mais à effets tangibles : il engage, oblige, attache, désigne. Cette dimension est cruciale pour notre modélisation archicratique : le *mana* anticipe la notion de valeur-autorité sans fondement souverain, une *cratialité objectale*, c’est-à-dire une puissance incorporée dans les médiations matérielles du lien social. C’est à la fois une force, un lien, un devoir — et c’est précisément cela qui rend le don *régulateur sans institution*, *structurant sans structure*, *archicratique sans appareil*. Il constitue le noyau énergétique du *fait social total*. +Le *mana* est donc une intensité cratiale symboliquement incorporée, une +énergie régulatrice sans corps, mais à effets tangibles : il engage, +oblige, attache, désigne. Cette dimension est cruciale pour notre +modélisation archicratique : le *mana* anticipe la notion de +valeur-autorité sans fondement souverain, une *cratialité objectale*, +c'est-à-dire une puissance incorporée dans les médiations matérielles du +lien social. C'est à la fois une force, un lien, un devoir — et c'est +précisément cela qui rend le don *régulateur sans institution*, +*structurant sans structure*, *archicratique sans appareil*. Il +constitue le noyau énergétique du *fait social total*. -Le génie maussien réside dans cette révélation : la *trialectique du don* — donner, recevoir, rendre — constitue un mécanisme de régulation incorporé, structurel, mais sans souveraineté instituée. Ce mécanisme, écrit Mauss, est « obligatoire et cependant libre », ce qui signifie qu’il articule la contrainte sociale à l’agir symbolique, la nécessité au jeu rituel. Il incarne une *normativité sans norme*, une *obligation non codifiée*, mais socialement surdéterminante. La régulation est donc ici *archicratique en puissance* : elle ne repose ni sur une légalité juridique, ni sur une rationalité économique, ni sur une violence imposée, mais sur une *tension productive entre réciprocité, dette, honneur et mémoire*. Il s’agit d’un pouvoir sans domination explicite, d’un ordre social sans institution centrale, d’une *co-viabilité fondée sur l’obligation symbolique qui engage*, contraint tout en restant libre. +Le génie maussien réside dans cette révélation : la *trialectique du +don* — donner, recevoir, rendre — constitue un mécanisme de +régulation incorporé, structurel, mais sans souveraineté instituée. Ce +mécanisme, écrit Mauss, est « obligatoire et cependant libre », ce qui +signifie qu'il articule la contrainte sociale à l'agir symbolique, la +nécessité au jeu rituel. Il incarne une *normativité sans norme*, une +*obligation non codifiée*, mais socialement surdéterminante. La +régulation est donc ici *archicratique en puissance* : elle ne repose ni +sur une légalité juridique, ni sur une rationalité économique, ni sur +une violence imposée, mais sur une *tension productive entre +réciprocité, dette, honneur et mémoire*. Il s'agit d'un pouvoir sans +domination explicite, d'un ordre social sans institution centrale, d'une +*co-viabilité fondée sur l'obligation symbolique qui engage*, contraint +tout en restant libre. -Cette architecture du don présente en effet plusieurs traits majeurs pour le paradigme archicratique. L’arcalité y est diffuse : traditions, cosmologies et croyances incorporées rendent le don contraignant sans recourir à une norme juridique explicite. La cratialité y est relationnelle : elle s’exerce par la dette, le prestige, l’honneur, l’obligation de répondre, non par coercition centralisée. Quant à l’archicration, elle prend la forme d’un mécanisme de viabilité structurelle, capable de faire tenir ensemble les relations sans État, sans bureaucratie et sans police, par la mémoire du don et l’horizon du retour. +Cette architecture du don présente en effet plusieurs traits majeurs +pour le paradigme archicratique. L'arcalité y est diffuse : traditions, +cosmologies et croyances incorporées rendent le don contraignant sans +recourir à une norme juridique explicite. La cratialité y est +relationnelle : elle s'exerce par la dette, le prestige, l'honneur, +l'obligation de répondre, non par coercition centralisée. Quant à +l'archicration, elle prend la forme d'un mécanisme de viabilité +structurelle, capable de faire tenir ensemble les relations sans État, +sans bureaucratie et sans police, par la mémoire du don et l'horizon du +retour. -Le potlatch en donne la forme hypertrophiée : une cratialité exacerbée, visible, agonistique, mais encore intégrée au dispositif trialectique du donner, recevoir, rendre. Mauss met ainsi au jour la possibilité d’une co-viabilité régulée par des médiations rituelles, symboliques, affectives et mémorielles, autrement dit d’une matrice régulatrice pré-archicratique. Mais cette régulation reste pré-différenciée : elle ne connaît ni séparation fonctionnelle des sphères, ni réflexivité critique, ni véritable possibilité de désengagement. Le paradigme du don ouvre donc une voie décisive, mais encore inachevée, vers une régulation tensionnelle qui demande à être prolongée par une pensée de la modularité, de la différenciation et de la médiation consciente. +Le potlatch en donne la forme hypertrophiée : une cratialité exacerbée, +visible, agonistique, mais encore intégrée au dispositif trialectique du +donner, recevoir, rendre. Mauss met ainsi au jour la possibilité d'une +co-viabilité régulée par des médiations rituelles, symboliques, +affectives et mémorielles, autrement dit d'une matrice régulatrice +pré-archicratique. Mais cette régulation reste pré-différenciée : elle +ne connaît ni séparation fonctionnelle des sphères, ni réflexivité +critique, ni véritable possibilité de désengagement. Le paradigme du don +ouvre donc une voie décisive, mais encore inachevée, vers une régulation +tensionnelle qui demande à être prolongée par une pensée de la +modularité, de la différenciation et de la médiation consciente. ### 3.2.2 — Habitus, champ et violence symbolique : *une régulation par inertie sociale* -25. S’il est un penseur qui a su dévoiler avec une implacable lucidité les mécanismes invisibles de la domination sociale — sans pour autant proposer un modèle de régulation différenciée — c’est bien Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002). Son œuvre, à la fois monumentale, rigoureusement charpentée et stratégiquement dispersée dans une série d’interventions croisées, constitue une critique radicale du pouvoir comme légitimation apparente, révélant les rouages profonds de ce qu’il nomme la violence symbolique. Ce n’est pas dans la loi, la souveraineté ou le contrat que se joue la régulation sociale, mais dans l’incorporation des structures, dans la reproduction déguisée des rapports de domination, dans la transformation des différences sociales en hiérarchies perçues comme naturelles. Il s’agit d’une régulation sans régulateur central, d’un pouvoir diffus qui opère par inertie sociale, sans recours à une structure centrale, ni à une *arcalité* explicite : autrement dit, d’une *désarchicration systémique*, où la scène d’épreuve archicratique est absorbée dans la reproduction même des dispositions. +S'il est un penseur qui a su dévoiler avec une implacable lucidité les +mécanismes invisibles de la domination sociale — sans pour autant +proposer un modèle de régulation différenciée — c'est bien Pierre +Bourdieu (1930–2002). Son œuvre, à la fois monumentale, rigoureusement +charpentée et stratégiquement dispersée dans une série d'interventions +croisées, constitue une critique radicale du pouvoir comme légitimation +apparente, révélant les rouages profonds de ce qu'il nomme la violence +symbolique. Ce n'est pas dans la loi, la souveraineté ou le contrat que +se joue la régulation sociale, mais dans l'incorporation des structures, +dans la reproduction déguisée des rapports de domination, dans la +transformation des différences sociales en hiérarchies perçues comme +naturelles. Il s'agit d'une régulation sans régulateur central, d'un +pouvoir diffus qui opère par inertie sociale, sans recours à une +structure centrale, ni à une *arcalité* explicite : autrement dit, d'une +*désarchicration systémique*, où la scène d'épreuve archicratique est +absorbée dans la reproduction même des dispositions. -26. Au fondement de cette régulation silencieuse, Bourdieu place l’habitus — ce concept central qu’il définit comme : +Au fondement de cette régulation silencieuse, Bourdieu place l'habitus — ce concept central qu'il définit comme : -« Des systèmes de dispositions durables et transposables, structures structurées prédisposées à fonctionner comme structures structurantes, c’est-à-dire en tant que principes générateurs et organisateurs de pratiques et de représentations. » (*Le sens pratique*, Éditions de Minuit, 1980, p. 88) +« Des systèmes de dispositions durables et transposables, structures +structurées prédisposées à fonctionner comme structures structurantes, +c'est-à-dire en tant que principes générateurs et organisateurs de +pratiques et de représentations. » (*Le sens pratique*, Éditions de +Minuit, 1980, p. 88) -27. L’*habitus* fonctionne comme une mémoire sociale incarnée dans le corps, incorporée par la socialisation, qui guide les pratiques sans être perçue comme norme ou injonction. Il produit des régularités sans règle, des ajustements sans calcul, des conformités sans contrainte : c’est un *krateîn* sans acte visible, une régulation infra-politique sans scène d’épreuve, sans commandement, sans appareil. Le pouvoir ne s’y exprime pas comme force, mais comme familiarité ; il n’impose pas, il s’éprouve. C’est la puissance la plus efficace : celle qui n’a plus besoin de s’énoncer pour s’exercer. +L'*habitus* fonctionne comme une mémoire sociale incarnée dans le corps, +incorporée par la socialisation, qui guide les pratiques sans être +perçue comme norme ou injonction. Il produit des régularités sans règle, +des ajustements sans calcul, des conformités sans contrainte : c'est un +*krateîn* sans acte visible, une régulation infra-politique sans scène +d'épreuve, sans commandement, sans appareil. Le pouvoir ne s'y exprime +pas comme force, mais comme familiarité ; il n'impose pas, il s'éprouve. +C'est la puissance la plus efficace : celle qui n'a plus besoin de +s'énoncer pour s'exercer. -28. On le voit par exemple dans ces phénomènes d’auto-exclusion symbolique, où des classes populaires n’osent entrer ni dans un musée, ni dans un théâtre, ni dans un restaurant étoilé — non parce qu’une règle l’interdit, mais parce que l’habitus les en dissuade de l’intérieur. Il ne s’agit pas ici d’un interdit explicite, mais d’un *mécanisme incorporé de disqualification anticipée, d’un sentiment d’illégitimité intériorisé*. C’est précisément là que réside la forme la plus pernicieuse de régulation : celle qui agit sans friction, sans médiation formelle, par simple mise en adéquation entre les dispositions et les structures. Le pouvoir devient *ajustement*, non *affrontement* ; et sa plus grande efficacité réside dans le fait qu’*il n’a pas à s’énoncer pour s’exercer*. +On le voit par exemple dans ces phénomènes d'auto-exclusion symbolique, +où des classes populaires n'osent entrer ni dans un musée, ni dans un +théâtre, ni dans un restaurant étoilé — non parce qu'une règle +l'interdit, mais parce que l'habitus les en dissuade de l'intérieur. Il +ne s'agit pas ici d'un interdit explicite, mais d'un *mécanisme +incorporé de disqualification anticipée, d'un sentiment d'illégitimité +intériorisé*. C'est précisément là que réside la forme la plus +pernicieuse de régulation : celle qui agit sans friction, sans médiation +formelle, par simple mise en adéquation entre les dispositions et les +structures. Le pouvoir devient *ajustement*, non *affrontement* ; et sa +plus grande efficacité réside dans le fait qu'*il n'a pas à s'énoncer +pour s'exercer*. -29. Cette régulation infra-symbolique s’ancre dans ce que Bourdieu appelle le champ : un espace social différencié, structuré par des luttes pour l’accès aux ressources symboliques et matérielles, où chaque agent occupe une position déterminée par la possession relative de capitaux — *économique, culturel, social, symbolique*. Ces capitaux définissent les marges de manœuvre, les possibilités d’action, les styles de vie, et les anticipations incorporées de ce qui est possible ou non. L’ordre social se maintient moins par l’interdit que par la présomption intériorisée du possible, selon laquelle certains individus, de facto, *n’osent pas*, *n’imaginent pas*, *ne tentent pas* — car ils ont appris à ne pas se croire autorisés. +Cette régulation infra-symbolique s'ancre dans ce que Bourdieu appelle +le champ : un espace social différencié, structuré par des luttes pour +l'accès aux ressources symboliques et matérielles, où chaque agent +occupe une position déterminée par la possession relative de capitaux — *économique, culturel, social, symbolique*. Ces capitaux définissent +les marges de manœuvre, les possibilités d'action, les styles de vie, et +les anticipations incorporées de ce qui est possible ou non. L'ordre +social se maintient moins par l'interdit que par la présomption +intériorisée du possible, selon laquelle certains individus, de facto, +*n'osent pas*, *n'imaginent pas*, *ne tentent pas* — car ils ont +appris à ne pas se croire autorisés. -30. Cette logique de reproduction silencieuse atteint son efficacité maximale dans le champ scolaire, que Bourdieu et Passeron décrivent comme une instance d’« *inculcation durable de dispositions* », fondée sur la croyance collective dans la neutralité du mérite et la légitimité du savoir transmis (cf. *La reproduction*, 1970). L’école devient ainsi une méta-institution de régulation symbolique, où les habitus inégalement armés face aux exigences culturelles sont reconvertis en performances différenciées, invisibilisant les inégalités initiales. Le système éducatif ne corrige pas les dominations : il les légitime sous couvert d’objectivité. La régulation y est d’autant plus puissante qu’elle se présente comme neutre, d’autant plus contraignante qu’elle se veut libératrice. +Cette logique de reproduction silencieuse atteint son efficacité +maximale dans le champ scolaire, que Bourdieu et Passeron décrivent +comme une instance d'« *inculcation durable de dispositions* », fondée +sur la croyance collective dans la neutralité du mérite et la légitimité +du savoir transmis (cf. *La reproduction*, 1970). L'école devient ainsi +une méta-institution de régulation symbolique, où les habitus +inégalement armés face aux exigences culturelles sont reconvertis en +performances différenciées, invisibilisant les inégalités initiales. Le +système éducatif ne corrige pas les dominations : il les légitime sous +couvert d'objectivité. La régulation y est d'autant plus puissante +qu'elle se présente comme neutre, d'autant plus contraignante qu'elle se +veut libératrice. -31. Dans *La distinction* (1979), Bourdieu met en évidence comment les goûts, les pratiques culturelles, les habitus corporels même, participent à une mise en forme esthétique de la domination. Le jugement esthétique n’est jamais neutre : il est un acte de *classement social*, une *distinction*, une *différenciation légitimée par l’apparence du naturel*. De sorte que la culture fonctionne comme une sorte de mécanisme de tri social, les goûts et les couleurs étant vecteurs de marqueurs de classe sociale. Cette logique classificatoire trouve son prolongement dans ce que Bourdieu nomme *le pouvoir symbolique*, c’est-à-dire la *capacité à imposer des catégories de perception légitimes*, à produire des effets de monde par simple acte de nomination. +Dans *La distinction* (1979), Bourdieu met en évidence comment les +goûts, les pratiques culturelles, les habitus corporels même, +participent à une mise en forme esthétique de la domination. Le jugement +esthétique n'est jamais neutre : il est un acte de *classement social*, +une *distinction*, une *différenciation légitimée par l'apparence du +naturel*. De sorte que la culture fonctionne comme une sorte de +mécanisme de tri social, les goûts et les couleurs étant vecteurs de +marqueurs de classe sociale. Cette logique classificatoire trouve son +prolongement dans ce que Bourdieu nomme *le pouvoir symbolique*, +c'est-à-dire la *capacité à imposer des catégories de perception +légitimes*, à produire des effets de monde par simple acte de +nomination. -« Le *pouvoir symbolique* est en effet ce pouvoir invisible qui ne peut s’exercer qu’avec la complicité de ceux qui ne veulent pas savoir qu’ils le subissent ou même qu’ils l’exercent. » (*Le pouvoir symbolique*, 1991). +« Le *pouvoir symbolique* est en effet ce pouvoir invisible qui ne peut +s'exercer qu'avec la complicité de ceux qui ne veulent pas savoir qu'ils +le subissent ou même qu'ils l'exercent. » (*Le pouvoir symbolique*, +1991). -32. La régulation sociale se joue alors dans les mots mêmes qui désignent, hiérarchisent, distinguent. Le langage ne se contente pas de décrire : il ordonne, organise, stabilise les rapports sociaux. En ce sens, *toute nomination est déjà un acte de régulation*. +La régulation sociale se joue alors dans les mots mêmes qui désignent, +hiérarchisent, distinguent. Le langage ne se contente pas de décrire : +il ordonne, organise, stabilise les rapports sociaux. En ce sens, *toute +nomination est déjà un acte de régulation*. -33. Ce que met ici au jour Bourdieu, c’est une arcalité incarnée : les structures d’autorité ne résident plus dans des textes ou des institutions explicites, mais dans les corps, les postures, les langages, les goûts et les affects. La violence symbolique devient ainsi le mode ordinaire d’une régulation silencieuse, efficace précisément parce qu’elle se présente comme naturelle. Il ne s’agit pas d’un excès ponctuel du pouvoir, mais de son régime régulier de reproduction. +Ce que met ici au jour Bourdieu, c'est une arcalité incarnée : les +structures d'autorité ne résident plus dans des textes ou des +institutions explicites, mais dans les corps, les postures, les +langages, les goûts et les affects. La violence symbolique devient ainsi +le mode ordinaire d'une régulation silencieuse, efficace précisément +parce qu'elle se présente comme naturelle. Il ne s'agit pas d'un excès +ponctuel du pouvoir, mais de son régime régulier de reproduction. -Dans la grille archicratique, cette puissance explicative est majeure : l’arcalité y est implicite et héritée, la cratialité différenciée mais invisible, et l’archicration proprement dite absente comme scène instituée. La régulation demeure infrapolitique, mimétique, reproductive. C’est aussi la limite du modèle bourdieusien : il démonte avec une lucidité exemplaire les rouages de la domination, mais ne pense ni médiation réflexive, ni conflictualité instituante, ni formes modulables de transformation. L’Archicratie doit donc le prolonger dialectiquement : intégrer sa critique du pouvoir symbolique, mais y réintroduire les conditions d’une régulation différenciée, explicite et transformatrice. +Dans la grille archicratique, cette puissance explicative est majeure : +l'arcalité y est implicite et héritée, la cratialité différenciée mais +invisible, et l'archicration proprement dite absente comme scène +instituée. La régulation demeure infrapolitique, mimétique, +reproductive. C'est aussi la limite du modèle bourdieusien : il démonte +avec une lucidité exemplaire les rouages de la domination, mais ne pense +ni médiation réflexive, ni conflictualité instituante, ni formes +modulables de transformation. L'Archicratie doit donc le prolonger +dialectiquement : intégrer sa critique du pouvoir symbolique, mais y +réintroduire les conditions d'une régulation différenciée, explicite et +transformatrice. ### 3.2.3 — Dispositifs, biopouvoirs, gouvernementalité : *une régulation sans dialogue* -34. Au sein des pensées critiques de la régulation, peu ont opéré un retournement aussi irremplaçable que celui de Michel Foucault (1926–1984). Ni juriste, ni politiste au sens classique, ni même sociologue de la domination, ce normalien de formation, agrégé de philosophie, construit une généalogie radicalement décentrée de la régulation contemporaine — non depuis les institutions constituées, mais depuis les corps, les pratiques, les savoirs, les normes, les architectures du visible. Là où Bourdieu exhibe la logique de reproduction sociale comme inertie incorporée, Foucault désarticule les conditions mêmes d’émergence du pouvoir : non plus comme volonté, loi ou violence instituée, mais comme *dispositif* — c’est-à-dire comme réseau producteur de normativité anonyme, silencieuse, impalpable, mais omniprésente. +Au sein des pensées critiques de la régulation, peu ont opéré un +retournement aussi irremplaçable que celui de Michel Foucault +(1926–1984). Ni juriste, ni politiste au sens classique, ni même +sociologue de la domination, ce normalien de formation, agrégé de +philosophie, construit une généalogie radicalement décentrée de la +régulation contemporaine — non depuis les institutions constituées, +mais depuis les corps, les pratiques, les savoirs, les normes, les +architectures du visible. Là où Bourdieu exhibe la logique de +reproduction sociale comme inertie incorporée, Foucault désarticule les +conditions mêmes d'émergence du pouvoir : non plus comme volonté, loi ou +violence instituée, mais comme *dispositif* — c'est-à-dire comme +réseau producteur de normativité anonyme, silencieuse, impalpable, mais +omniprésente. -35. Dans *Surveiller et punir* (1975), Foucault dévoile une mutation majeure de la régulation sociale : la transition d’un régime du supplice, spectaculaire et souverain, à un régime disciplinaire, diffus et capillaire. Ce n’est plus le pouvoir qui se montre, c’est la société qui s’organise pour rendre chacun visible, donc normalisable, donc régulable. Le *panoptique*, dispositif architectural imaginé par Jeremy Bentham, devient chez Foucault le paradigme du pouvoir moderne : un pouvoir qui ne s’exerce plus depuis un centre, mais depuis une configuration asymétrique du regard, internalisée par les sujets eux-mêmes. Chacun devient son propre surveillant, sa propre norme. +Dans *Surveiller et punir* (1975), Foucault dévoile une mutation majeure +de la régulation sociale : la transition d'un régime du supplice, +spectaculaire et souverain, à un régime disciplinaire, diffus et +capillaire. Ce n'est plus le pouvoir qui se montre, c'est la société qui +s'organise pour rendre chacun visible, donc normalisable, donc +régulable. Le *panoptique*, dispositif architectural imaginé par Jeremy +Bentham, devient chez Foucault le paradigme du pouvoir moderne : un +pouvoir qui ne s'exerce plus depuis un centre, mais depuis une +configuration asymétrique du regard, internalisée par les sujets +eux-mêmes. Chacun devient son propre surveillant, sa propre norme. -36. Cette régulation n’est plus fondée sur l’énonciation d’un interdit, mais sur la production d’un *champ de normalité*. Le pouvoir ne dit plus « tu dois », il suggère : « voilà ce qui est attendu, ce qui est efficace, ce qui est normal ». Il ne punit plus seulement ce qui dévie, il fabrique ce qui est conforme. Ce mouvement, Foucault le saisit dans une formule décisive : +Cette régulation n'est plus fondée sur l'énonciation d'un interdit, mais +sur la production d'un *champ de normalité*. Le pouvoir ne dit plus « tu +dois », il suggère : « voilà ce qui est attendu, ce qui est efficace, ce +qui est normal ». Il ne punit plus seulement ce qui dévie, il fabrique +ce qui est conforme. Ce mouvement, Foucault le saisit dans une formule +décisive : -« (…) on peut dire qu'on dispose vraiment de très peu de choses. On dispose, d'abord, de cette affirmation que le pouvoir ne se donne pas, ni ne s'échange, ni ne se reprend, mais qu'il s'exerce et qu'il n'existe qu'en acte » (*Il faut défendre la société*, Cours au Collège de France, 1976) +« (...) on peut dire qu'on dispose vraiment de très peu de choses. On +dispose, d'abord, de cette affirmation que le pouvoir ne se donne pas, +ni ne s'échange, ni ne se reprend, mais qu'il s'exerce et qu'il n'existe +qu'en acte » (*Il faut défendre la société*, Cours au Collège de France, +1976) -37. À partir de la fin des années 1970, Foucault approfondit cette dynamique par le concept de *gouvernementalité*. Ce dernier ne désigne pas l’action de gouverner en tant qu’exercice d’autorité, mais un art de conduire les conduites, un mode de production de subjectivité. Le gouvernement devient un agencement de normes, d’objectifs, de techniques, de discours et de savoirs qui façonne les comportements sans jamais avoir besoin de les ordonner directement. La régulation devient structurelle, environnementale, englobante. +À partir de la fin des années 1970, Foucault approfondit cette dynamique +par le concept de *gouvernementalité*. Ce dernier ne désigne pas +l'action de gouverner en tant qu'exercice d'autorité, mais un art de +conduire les conduites, un mode de production de subjectivité. Le +gouvernement devient un agencement de normes, d'objectifs, de +techniques, de discours et de savoirs qui façonne les comportements sans +jamais avoir besoin de les ordonner directement. La régulation devient +structurelle, environnementale, englobante. -38. La clé de voûte de ce processus, c’est le *dispositif*. Dans un texte fondamental, Foucault le définit comme suit : +La clé de voûte de ce processus, c'est le *dispositif*. Dans un texte +fondamental, Foucault le définit comme suit : -« Ce que j’essaie de repérer sous ce nom, c’est, premièrement un ensemble résolument hétérogène comportant des discours, des institutions, des aménagements architecturaux, des décisions réglementaires, des lois, des mesures administratives, des énoncés scientifiques, des propositions philosophiques, morales, philanthropiques, bref : du dit aussi bien que du non-dit. Voilà les éléments du dispositif. Le dispositif lui-même, c’est le réseau qu’on établit entre ces éléments. » (*Dits et écrits*, t. III, Gallimard, 1994, p. 299) +« Ce que j'essaie de repérer sous ce nom, c'est, premièrement un +ensemble résolument hétérogène comportant des discours, des +institutions, des aménagements architecturaux, des décisions +réglementaires, des lois, des mesures administratives, des énoncés +scientifiques, des propositions philosophiques, morales, +philanthropiques, bref : du dit aussi bien que du non-dit. Voilà les +éléments du dispositif. Le dispositif lui-même, c'est le réseau qu'on +établit entre ces éléments. » (*Dits et écrits*, t. III, Gallimard, +1994, p. 299) -39. Ce passage est crucial pour notre analyse archicratique : il confirme que, chez Foucault, la régulation ne repose pas sur un *arkhê* explicite ou fondé, mais sur des ensembles de corrélations opératoires, des structures sans architecte, des normativités sans principe. Il s’agit non d’une absence totale, mais d’un éclatement de l’arcalité en une multiplicité de foyers opératoires, sans centre, sans transcendance, sans justification première. L’*arkhê* y devient tactique, fluente, composite. +Ce passage est crucial pour notre analyse archicratique : il confirme +que, chez Foucault, la régulation ne repose pas sur un *arkhê* explicite +ou fondé, mais sur des ensembles de corrélations opératoires, des +structures sans architecte, des normativités sans principe. Il s'agit +non d'une absence totale, mais d'un éclatement de l'arcalité en une +multiplicité de foyers opératoires, sans centre, sans transcendance, +sans justification première. L'*arkhê* y devient tactique, fluente, +composite. -40. Dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), Foucault explore une autre strate de cette régulation : le passage d’un pouvoir sur les territoires à un pouvoir sur les vivants. Le biopouvoir ne cherche pas à interdire, mais à gérer la vie, à l’optimiser, à l’encadrer. Il ne punit plus, il prévient. Il ne contraint pas, il incite. La régulation devient une modulation de l’environnement social et biologique, et l’individu une unité de gestion, une variable d’optimisation. +Dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), Foucault explore une autre +strate de cette régulation : le passage d'un pouvoir sur les territoires +à un pouvoir sur les vivants. Le biopouvoir ne cherche pas à interdire, +mais à gérer la vie, à l'optimiser, à l'encadrer. Il ne punit plus, il +prévient. Il ne contraint pas, il incite. La régulation devient une +modulation de l'environnement social et biologique, et l'individu une +unité de gestion, une variable d'optimisation. -41. Ce modèle atteint son sommet dans l’analyse de la gouvernementalité néolibérale. Loin d’un État autoritaire, ce dernier produit des sujets libres — mais cette liberté est elle-même programmée : elle est celle de l’auto-entrepreneur, du sujet évaluateur, du citoyen performant. Le pouvoir devient incitation, benchmarking, ajustement individuel. Le *krateîn* n’est pas commandement, mais fabrication d’un désir conforme. Il ne se voit pas, il se vit. +Ce modèle atteint son sommet dans l'analyse de la gouvernementalité +néolibérale. Loin d'un État autoritaire, ce dernier produit des sujets +libres — mais cette liberté est elle-même programmée : elle est celle +de l'auto-entrepreneur, du sujet évaluateur, du citoyen performant. Le +pouvoir devient incitation, benchmarking, ajustement individuel. Le +*krateîn* n'est pas commandement, mais fabrication d'un désir conforme. +Il ne se voit pas, il se vit. -42. Du point de vue archicratique, Foucault propose une cartographie chirurgicale de la régulation comme exercice décentré, capillaire et stratifié. L’arcalité s’y dissémine en foyers opératoires sans centre ni transcendance ; la cratialité devient circulation de forces, conditionnement comportemental, production de subjectivités ; ce que nous nommons archicration n’y trouve pas encore sa forme scénique, mais une modulation infra-politique, efficace et muette. +Du point de vue archicratique, Foucault propose une cartographie +chirurgicale de la régulation comme exercice décentré, capillaire et +stratifié. L'arcalité s'y dissémine en foyers opératoires sans centre ni +transcendance ; la cratialité devient circulation de forces, +conditionnement comportemental, production de subjectivités ; ce que +nous nommons archicration n'y trouve pas encore sa forme scénique, mais +une modulation infra-politique, efficace et muette. -C’est là sa force et sa limite. Foucault décrit avec une précision rare les soubassements diffus de la régulation contemporaine, mais il ne permet pas encore de penser une régulation réflexive, volontairement instituée et différenciée. Le pouvoir est partout ; la régulation légitime demeure introuvable. L’Archicratie ne peut donc se contenter du diagnostic foucaldien : elle doit en reprendre la vigilance et la critique des fondements, tout en élaborant les conditions d’une recomposition explicite entre normativité distribuée, médiation et scène instituante. +C'est là sa force et sa limite. Foucault décrit avec une précision rare +les soubassements diffus de la régulation contemporaine, mais il ne +permet pas encore de penser une régulation réflexive, volontairement +instituée et différenciée. Le pouvoir est partout ; la régulation +légitime demeure introuvable. L'Archicratie ne peut donc se contenter du +diagnostic foucaldien : elle doit en reprendre la vigilance et la +critique des fondements, tout en élaborant les conditions d'une +recomposition explicite entre normativité distribuée, médiation et scène +instituante. ### **3.2.4 — Exception souveraine et théologie implicite : *une régulation imposée*** -Si Schmitt ne relève pas au premier chef d’une régulation diffuse ou incorporée, il constitue ici un point-limite central : celui où l’implicite théologico-politique recondense brutalement la régulation dans l’acte d’exception, révélant par contraste ce que les formes diffuses laissent souterrainement subsister. +Si Schmitt ne relève pas au premier chef d'une régulation diffuse ou +incorporée, il constitue ici un point-limite central : celui où +l'implicite théologico-politique recondense brutalement la régulation +dans l'acte d'exception, révélant par contraste ce que les formes +diffuses laissent souterrainement subsister. -Si la philosophie moderne du pouvoir s’est souvent fondée sur la rationalité normative, le contrat social ou l’équilibre institutionnel, Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) se distingue par une rupture aussi radicale qu’irréversible : il ne pense pas le pouvoir depuis la règle, mais depuis l’*exception*. Il ne conçoit pas l’ordre depuis la loi, mais depuis la capacité à la suspendre. Son œuvre, profondément enracinée dans les fractures politiques du XXe siècle, propose une lecture intensément décisionnaliste de la souveraineté, et par là même, un modèle de régulation silencieuse, opaque, unilatérale, fondée sur un acte inaugural de fondation sans justification. Là où Foucault dissout le pouvoir dans les dispositifs, et Bourdieu dans les habitus, Schmitt le reconcentre dans le geste d’exception, dans le pouvoir de suspendre la normativité au nom d’un ordre antérieur, d’une autorité immaîtrisable, d’un fondement hors du langage. +Si la philosophie moderne du pouvoir s'est souvent fondée sur la +rationalité normative, le contrat social ou l'équilibre institutionnel, +Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) se distingue par une rupture aussi radicale +qu'irréversible : il ne pense pas le pouvoir depuis la règle, mais +depuis l'*exception*. Il ne conçoit pas l'ordre depuis la loi, mais +depuis la capacité à la suspendre. Son œuvre, profondément enracinée +dans les fractures politiques du XXe siècle, propose une lecture +intensément décisionnaliste de la souveraineté, et par là même, un +modèle de régulation silencieuse, opaque, unilatérale, fondée sur un +acte inaugural de fondation sans justification. Là où Foucault dissout +le pouvoir dans les dispositifs, et Bourdieu dans les habitus, Schmitt +le reconcentre dans le geste d'exception, dans le pouvoir de suspendre +la normativité au nom d'un ordre antérieur, d'une autorité +immaîtrisable, d'un fondement hors du langage. -Dans *Théologie politique* (1922), Schmitt énonce sa thèse la plus célèbre — et la plus directement mobilisable pour notre analyse archicratique : +Dans *Théologie politique* (1922), Schmitt énonce sa thèse la plus +célèbre — et la plus directement mobilisable pour notre analyse +archicratique : -« Est souverain celui qui décide de la situation exceptionnelle. » -(*Théologie politique*, 1922, trad. G. Schwab, Gallimard, 1988, p. 15) +« Est souverain celui qui décide de la situation exceptionnelle. »\ +(*Théologie politique*, 1922, trad. G. Schwab, Gallimard, 1988, p. 15) -Par cette formule, il rompt avec toutes les pensées de la souveraineté fondées sur la légalité, la représentativité, ou la participation. Il propose une conception archicratique extrême : *l’autorité qui fonde n’a pas besoin d’être fondée*. La régulation se constitue par un *geste inaugural, non discursif, qui déclare l’exception, suspend la norme, institue un ordre par un acte qui échappe à toute procédure dialogique*. C’est une régulation sans justification, sans médiation réflexive, sans co-viabilité négociée. L’*arkhê* s’y manifeste sous la forme d’un pouvoir absolu, transcendant, voire mystique, qui n’a pas à démontrer sa légitimité : il la *pose* en s’imposant. +Par cette formule, il rompt avec toutes les pensées de la souveraineté +fondées sur la légalité, la représentativité ou la participation. Il +propose une conception archicratique extrême : *l'autorité qui fonde n'a +pas besoin d'être fondée*. La régulation se constitue par un *geste +inaugural, non discursif, qui déclare l'exception, suspend la norme, +institue un ordre par un acte qui échappe à toute procédure dialogique*. +C'est une régulation sans justification, sans médiation réflexive, sans +co-viabilité négociée. L'*arkhê* s'y manifeste sous la forme d'un +pouvoir absolu, transcendant, voire mystique, qui n'a pas à démontrer sa +légitimité : il la *pose* en s'imposant. -Ce qui rend cette pensée décisive pour notre modèle, c’est qu’elle anticipe le fonctionnement silencieux et invisible de nombreuses régulations contemporaines, notamment dans les états d’exception, les régimes d’urgence, les décisions exécutives sans délibération publique, mais aussi dans certains protocoles de sécurité algorithmique où la règle est suspendue au profit de la réaction automatique. En ce sens, Schmitt éclaire une limite extrême où la régulation bascule vers la pure décision, où le pouvoir ne passe plus par des lois partagées, mais par l’*instauration univoque d’un cadre d’intervention, toujours justifié par la menace ou l’urgence.* +Ce qui rend cette pensée décisive pour notre modèle, c'est qu'elle +anticipe le fonctionnement silencieux et invisible de nombreuses +régulations contemporaines, notamment dans les états d'exception, les +régimes d'urgence, les décisions exécutives sans délibération publique, +mais aussi dans certains protocoles de sécurité algorithmique où la +règle est suspendue au profit de la réaction automatique. En ce sens, +Schmitt éclaire une limite extrême où la régulation bascule vers la pure +décision, où le pouvoir ne passe plus par des lois partagées, mais par +l'*instauration univoque d'un cadre d'intervention, toujours justifié +par la menace ou l'urgence.* -Plus encore, Schmitt dévoile la structure théologico-politique de la souveraineté moderne. Dans un passage fondamental, il écrit : +Plus encore, Schmitt dévoile la structure théologico-politique de la +souveraineté moderne. Dans un passage fondamental, il écrit : -« Tous les concepts prégnants de la théorie moderne de l’État sont des concepts théologiques sécularisés. » (*Théologie politique*, ibid., p. 46) +« Tous les concepts prégnants de la théorie moderne de l'État sont des +concepts théologiques sécularisés. » (*Théologie politique*, ibid., +p. 46) -Cela signifie que, pour Schmitt, l’État moderne repose encore — même sous ses formes séculières — sur des structures de pensée qui dérivent du sacré : la toute-puissance, la transcendance, l’infaillibilité, la décision irréversible. Le souverain moderne est le Dieu caché de la normativité politique : il n’agit pas toujours, mais *il pourrait* ; et c’est cette virtualité fondatrice qui lui confère sa puissance. La régulation, dans cette optique, devient une *économie de la décision différée, un régime où l’exception suspend le jeu des normes et se substitue à toute procédure négociée*. +Cela signifie que, pour Schmitt, l'État moderne repose encore — même +sous ses formes séculières — sur des structures de pensée qui dérivent +du sacré : la toute-puissance, la transcendance, l'infaillibilité, la +décision irréversible. Le souverain moderne est le Dieu caché de la +normativité politique : il n'agit pas toujours, mais *il pourrait* ; et +c'est cette virtualité fondatrice qui lui confère sa puissance. La +régulation, dans cette optique, devient une *économie de la décision +différée, un régime où l'exception suspend le jeu des normes et se +substitue à toute procédure négociée*. -Cette vision est précieuse pour l’analyse archicratique parce qu’elle exhibe une forme extrême de régulation : un acte de fondation sans fondement, une imposition pure qui suspend la norme pour instituer un ordre. Schmitt donne ainsi à penser une limite extrême de la régulation décisionniste, non dialogique, où l’arkhê se manifeste comme décision absolue et la cratialité comme puissance unilatérale, sans médiation réflexive ni co-viabilité négociée. +Cette vision est précieuse pour l'analyse archicratique parce qu'elle +exhibe une forme extrême de régulation : un acte de fondation sans +fondement, une imposition pure qui suspend la norme pour instituer un +ordre. Schmitt donne ainsi à penser une limite extrême de la régulation +décisionniste, non dialogique, où l'arkhê se manifeste comme décision +absolue et la cratialité comme puissance unilatérale, sans médiation +réflexive ni co-viabilité négociée. -Mais cette puissance de dévoilement est aussi sa limite radicale. Schmitt ne pense jamais une régulation différenciée, pluraliste ou modulable : la tension n’y devient pas productive, elle est tranchée ; le conflit n’y est pas régulé, mais décidé ; le politique n’y est pas orchestration, mais discrimination binaire. C’est pourquoi son œuvre constitue moins un modèle qu’une borne extrême : celle du non-dialogique, du non-réversible, du non-modulable, à partir de laquelle seulement peut se préciser, par contraste, l’exigence d’une archicration réflexive et co-viable. +Mais cette puissance de dévoilement est aussi sa limite radicale. +Schmitt ne pense jamais une régulation différenciée, pluraliste ou +modulable : la tension n'y devient pas productive, elle est tranchée ; +le conflit n'y est pas régulé, mais décidé ; le politique n'y est pas +orchestration, mais discrimination binaire. C'est pourquoi son œuvre +constitue moins un modèle qu'une borne extrême : celle du +non-dialogique, du non-réversible, du non-modulable, à partir de +laquelle seulement peut se préciser, par contraste, l'exigence d'une +archicration réflexive et co-viable. ### 3.2.5 — Résonance et stabilisation du lien : *une régulation affective inopérante* -43. La pensée de *Hartmut Rosa*, issue de la tradition critique allemande, se distingue par une reformulation audacieuse des pathologies de la modernité : au lieu de les envisager sous l’angle classique de l’aliénation économique, du pouvoir disciplinaire ou du déficit démocratique, il les appréhende comme *déficits relationnels* — une mise en sourdine du monde, une perte de capacité à entrer en relation vivante avec ce qui nous entoure. Cette perspective, exposée notamment dans *Résonance. Une sociologie de la relation au monde* (La Découverte, 2018), fait de la *résonance* une catégorie centrale pour penser les conditions de la co-viabilité humaine. +La pensée de *Hartmut Rosa*, issue de la tradition critique allemande, +se distingue par une reformulation audacieuse des pathologies de la +modernité : au lieu de les envisager sous l'angle classique de +l'aliénation économique, du pouvoir disciplinaire ou du déficit +démocratique, il les appréhende comme *déficits relationnels* — une +mise en sourdine du monde, une perte de capacité à entrer en relation +vivante avec ce qui nous entoure. Cette perspective, exposée notamment +dans *Résonance. Une sociologie de la relation au monde* (La Découverte, +2018), fait de la *résonance* une catégorie centrale pour penser les +conditions de la co-viabilité humaine. -44. Selon Rosa, la modernité accélérée — définie par un triptyque d’accélération technique, sociale et existentielle — provoque un *mutisme du monde*. Les institutions, les rythmes, les technologies et les formes sociales se déploient dans une logique d’optimisation permanente, sans égard pour les formes de sens, d’engagement ou de transformation mutuelle. Il en résulte un isolement subjectif : l’individu devient performant mais *infréquentable*, actif mais *désaffecté*. +Selon Rosa, la modernité accélérée — définie par un triptyque +d'accélération technique, sociale et existentielle — provoque un +*mutisme du monde*. Les institutions, les rythmes, les technologies et +les formes sociales se déploient dans une logique d'optimisation +permanente, sans égard pour les formes de sens, d'engagement ou de +transformation mutuelle. Il en résulte un isolement subjectif : +l'individu devient performant mais *infréquentable*, actif mais +*désaffecté*. -45. Pour Rosa, la *résonance* constitue la contrepartie de ce désenchantement. Elle est *cette forme de rapport où sujet et monde se répondent, se transforment mutuellement, sans fusion ni instrumentalisation*. Elle suppose une disponibilité, une ouverture affective, une capacité à être atteint, touché, modifié — mais sans que cette modification ne soit une domination. Il écrit : +Pour Rosa, la *résonance* constitue la contrepartie de ce +désenchantement. Elle est *cette forme de rapport où sujet et monde se +répondent, se transforment mutuellement, sans fusion ni +instrumentalisation*. Elle suppose une disponibilité, une ouverture +affective, une capacité à être atteint, touché, modifié — mais sans +que cette modification ne soit une domination. Il écrit : -« La résonance est une forme de relation au monde associant affection et émotion, intérêt propre et sentiment d'efficacité personnelle, dans laquelle le sujet et le monde se touchent et se transforment mutuellement. La résonance n'est pas une relation d'écho, mais une relation de réponse. Les relations de résonance présupposent que le sujet et le monde sont suffisamment "fermés", ou consistants, afin de pouvoir parler de leur propre voix, et suffisamment ouverts afin de se laisser affecter et atteindre. » (*Résonance*, 2018) +« La résonance est une forme de relation au monde associant affection et +émotion, intérêt propre et sentiment d'efficacité personnelle, dans +laquelle le sujet et le monde se touchent et se transforment +mutuellement. La résonance n'est pas une relation d'écho, mais une +relation de réponse. Les relations de résonance présupposent que le +sujet et le monde sont suffisamment "fermés", ou consistants, afin de +pouvoir parler de leur propre voix, et suffisamment ouverts afin de se +laisser affecter et atteindre. » (*Résonance*, 2018) -46. En reconfigurant le lien social autour de la capacité d’être affecté par le monde, Rosa déplace la régulation hors des dispositifs, des structures normatives et des processus décisionnels. Il fait de la relation elle-même un opérateur ontologique de viabilité. Mais c’est aussi la limite décisive de sa pensée : la régulation y perd son sujet politique, sa médiation et sa différenciation. Il ne demeure plus qu’une espérance de résonance, conceptuellement stimulante, mais peu opératoire dans les conditions de conflictualité, d’asymétrie et de rupture qui constituent précisément le terrain de l’Archicratie. +En reconfigurant le lien social autour de la capacité d'être affecté par +le monde, Rosa déplace la régulation hors des dispositifs, des +structures normatives et des processus décisionnels. Il fait de la +relation elle-même un opérateur ontologique de viabilité. Mais c'est +aussi la limite décisive de sa pensée : la régulation y perd son sujet +politique, sa médiation et sa différenciation. Il ne demeure plus qu'une +espérance de résonance, conceptuellement stimulante, mais peu opératoire +dans les conditions de conflictualité, d'asymétrie et de rupture qui +constituent précisément le terrain de l'Archicratie. -Dans cette perspective, l’arcalité se dissout dans une normativité implicite de la résonance, la cratialité se trouve neutralisée dans l’idéal d’une relation harmonique, et l’archicration elle-même se réduit à un souhait ontologique sans dispositif ni architecture. La résonance demeure donc une ressource précieuse pour rappeler la dimension sensible de la co-viabilité, mais elle ne suffit pas à penser son orchestration. L’apport de Rosa doit ainsi être intégré comme condition partielle d’une archicration sensible, non comme modèle achevé de régulation. +Dans cette perspective, l'arcalité se dissout dans une normativité +implicite de la résonance, la cratialité se trouve neutralisée dans +l'idéal d'une relation harmonique, et l'archicration elle-même se réduit +à un souhait ontologique sans dispositif ni architecture. La résonance +demeure donc une ressource précieuse pour rappeler la dimension sensible +de la co-viabilité, mais elle ne suffit pas à penser son orchestration. +L'apport de Rosa doit ainsi être intégré comme condition partielle d'une +archicration sensible, non comme modèle achevé de régulation. -47. À travers ces régimes de régulation diffuse — champ, dispositif, exception, résonance — se dessine une redéfinition majeure du pouvoir : non plus autorité instituée, mais configuration émergente ; non plus norme centralisée, mais agencement diffus ; non plus direction explicite, mais inertie sociale, modulation comportementale ou affectivité structurante. Chacune de ces pensées démantèle l’illusion d’un pouvoir transcendant, mais aucune ne parvient encore à construire les médiations qui rendraient cette régulation pleinement modulable, réflexive et orchestrée. +À travers ces régimes de régulation diffuse — champ, dispositif, +exception, résonance — se dessine une redéfinition majeure du pouvoir +: non plus autorité instituée, mais configuration émergente ; non plus +norme centralisée, mais agencement diffus ; non plus direction +explicite, mais inertie sociale, modulation comportementale ou +affectivité structurante. Chacune de ces pensées démantèle l'illusion +d'un pouvoir transcendant, mais aucune ne parvient encore à construire +les médiations qui rendraient cette régulation pleinement modulable, +réflexive et orchestrée. -Bourdieu révèle l’incorporation silencieuse des dominations ; Foucault dissémine la régulation dans les dispositifs ; Schmitt montre sa captation par l’exception ; Rosa en déplace l’horizon vers la résonance. Toutes ouvrent ainsi une brèche décisive : celle d’une régulation non plus imposée mais distribuée, non plus fondée mais émergente. Mais cette brèche demeure inachevée tant que l’articulation explicite entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration n’est pas pensée. C’est précisément dans cet intervalle que s’ouvrira la section suivante, où l’Archicratie deviendra pensable comme processus de subjectivation, de configuration et de tension régulatrice. +Bourdieu révèle l'incorporation silencieuse des dominations ; Foucault +dissémine la régulation dans les dispositifs ; Schmitt montre sa +captation par l'exception ; Rosa en déplace l'horizon vers la résonance. +Toutes ouvrent ainsi une brèche décisive : celle d'une régulation non +plus imposée mais distribuée, non plus fondée mais émergente. Mais cette +brèche demeure inachevée tant que l'articulation explicite entre +arcalité, cratialité et archicration n'est pas pensée. C'est précisément +dans cet intervalle que s'ouvrira la section suivante, où l'Archicratie +deviendra pensable comme processus de subjectivation, de configuration +et de tension régulatrice. -## **3.3 — Régimes de la subjectivation, de l’affect et de la configuration —** *puissance émergente* +## **3.3 — Régimes de la subjectivation, de l'affect et de la configuration —** *puissance émergente* -48. Un seuil est franchi. Après les régimes fondationnels de l’ordre et les régimes diffus de la régulation silencieuse, apparaît une autre veine de pensée : celle où la régulation ne prend origine ni dans un arkhê extérieur, ni dans une machinerie anonyme, mais dans la dynamique même de la vie, des affects, de l’individuation et de la co-configuration d’un monde commun. Ici, arkhê, krateîn et archicration cessent d’apparaître comme des instances séparées : ils deviennent mouvants, plastiques, émergents. +Un seuil est franchi. Après les régimes fondationnels de l'ordre et les +régimes diffus de la régulation silencieuse, apparaît une autre veine de +pensée : celle où la régulation ne prend origine ni dans un arkhê +extérieur, ni dans une machinerie anonyme, mais dans la dynamique même +de la vie, des affects, de l'individuation et de la co-configuration +d'un monde commun. Ici, arkhê, krateîn et archicration cessent +d'apparaître comme des instances séparées : ils deviennent mouvants, +plastiques, émergents. -La régulation ne se pense plus comme structure imposée, mais comme processus ; non plus comme forme surplombante, mais comme configuration évolutive, relationnelle et transductive. C’est dans cette perspective que s’inscrivent Spinoza, Elias, Simondon et Arendt : chacun, à sa manière, tente de penser une puissance régulatrice immanente, non imposante, mais effective. Tous rendent possible une refondation partielle du paradigme archicratique en faisant apparaître la co-viabilité comme tension productive enchâssée dans les formes de vie elles-mêmes. +La régulation ne se pense plus comme structure imposée, mais comme +processus ; non plus comme forme surplombante, mais comme configuration +évolutive, relationnelle et transductive. C'est dans cette perspective +que s'inscrivent Spinoza, Elias, Simondon et Arendt : chacun, à sa +manière, tente de penser une puissance régulatrice immanente, non +imposante, mais effective. Tous rendent possible une refondation +partielle du paradigme archicratique en faisant apparaître la +co-viabilité comme tension productive enchâssée dans les formes de vie +elles-mêmes. -Mais cette percée a aussi ses limites. Ces pensées rendent pensables des puissances de subjectivation, de configuration ou d’apparition ; elles ne fournissent pas encore, du moins pas entièrement, les médiations, les architectures ni les dispositifs capables d’en soutenir durablement l’opérativité. C’est l’enjeu de cette section : dégager, dans chacune d’elles, ce qu’elle apporte à une pensée archicratique de la régulation, sans effacer la singularité de son geste ni surinterpréter ses promesses. +Mais cette percée a aussi ses limites. Ces pensées rendent pensables des +puissances de subjectivation, de configuration ou d'apparition ; elles +ne fournissent pas encore, du moins pas entièrement, les médiations, les +architectures ni les dispositifs capables d'en soutenir durablement +l'opérativité. C'est l'enjeu de cette section : dégager, dans chacune +d'elles, ce qu'elle apporte à une pensée archicratique de la régulation, +sans effacer la singularité de son geste ni surinterpréter ses +promesses. ### 3.3.1 — Conatus, affects et multitude — *une régulation intuitive* -49. Parmi les penseurs qui auront déplacé la question du pouvoir hors de la sphère juridique, théologico-politique ou institutionnelle, Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) occupe une place d’exception. Sa pensée n’introduit pas la régulation du vivre-ensemble comme réponse à un chaos originel (comme chez Hobbes), ni comme pacte rationnel (comme chez Rousseau), ni comme construction idéologique masquant des dominations (comme chez Bourdieu ou Foucault), mais comme dynamique immanente de la vie elle-même. Le cœur de sa philosophie politique — et plus encore de sa philosophie éthico-politique — se fonde dans une ontologie de la puissance, où la régulation s’effectue non par imposition ni par consentement, mais par modulation des affects, composition des puissances, articulation des devenirs. Autrement dit : l’*Archicratie* chez Spinoza n’est pas une structure ; elle est un champ de consistance affective, un diagramme de potentiels co-affectés. +Parmi les penseurs qui auront déplacé la question du pouvoir hors de la +sphère juridique, théologico-politique ou institutionnelle, Baruch +Spinoza (1632–1677) occupe une place d'exception. Sa pensée n'introduit +pas la régulation du vivre-ensemble comme réponse à un chaos originel +(comme chez Hobbes), ni comme pacte rationnel (comme chez Rousseau), ni +comme construction idéologique masquant des dominations (comme chez +Bourdieu ou Foucault), mais comme dynamique immanente de la vie +elle-même. Le cœur de sa philosophie politique — et plus encore de sa +philosophie éthico-politique — se fonde dans une ontologie de la +puissance, où la régulation s'effectue non par imposition ni par +consentement, mais par modulation des affects, composition des +puissances, articulation des devenirs. Autrement dit : l'*Archicratie* +chez Spinoza n'est pas une structure ; elle est un champ de consistance +affective, un diagramme de potentiels co-affectés. -50. Le point de départ de cette pensée régulatrice non-normative, c’est le *conatus.* Il ne s’agit pas d’un instinct de survie psychologique, mais d’un principe ontologique : +Le point de départ de cette pensée régulatrice non-normative, c'est le +*conatus.* Il ne s'agit pas d'un instinct de survie psychologique, mais +d'un principe ontologique, soit « l'effort par lequel chaque chose +s'efforce de persévérer dans son être n'est rien à part l'essence +actuelle de cette chose. » (Éthique, GF-Flammarion, III, Prop. 7, +p.143). -« l’effort par lequel chaque chose s’efforce de persévérer dans son être n’est rien à part l’essence actuelle de cette chose. » (Éthique, GF-Flammarion, III, Prop. 7, p.143). +Le *conatus* est la pulsation première de l'existence, son effort, son +énergie d'affirmation. Il est aussi le lieu premier où se joue la +régulation, car toute chose (humaine ou non) cherche à accroître sa +*puissance d'exister*. Or, cette puissance est toujours relative : elle +dépend des rencontres, des alliances, des affectations. Le sujet n'est +pas autonome, il est transindividuel, traversé, affecté, constitué par +les rapports qu'il entretient avec les autres êtres. -51. Le *conatus* est la pulsation première de l’existence, son effort, son énergie d’affirmation. Il est aussi le lieu premier où se joue la régulation, car toute chose (humaine ou non) cherche à accroître sa *puissance d’exister*. Or, cette puissance est toujours relative : elle dépend des rencontres, des alliances, des affectations. Le sujet n’est pas autonome, il est transindividuel, traversé, affecté, constitué par les rapports qu’il entretient avec les autres êtres. +Ainsi, dans le livre III de *l'Éthique*, Spinoza développe une véritable +*mécanique des affects*, où joie et tristesse ne sont pas des états +psychiques, mais des variations dans la *puissance d'agir*. La joie +(*laetitia*) est ce qui augmente notre puissance d'exister ; la +tristesse (*tristitia*), ce qui la diminue. La régulation, dans cette +perspective, n'est donc pas imposition d'un ordre, mais composition +d'une dynamique affective collective, qui tend à maximiser les affects +joyeux compatibles. Elle repose sur des modulations continues, des +ajustements réciproques entre puissances, des configurations mouvantes +d'affectation. -52. Ainsi, dans le livre III de *l’Éthique*, Spinoza développe une véritable *mécanique des affects*, où joie et tristesse ne sont pas des états psychiques, mais des variations dans la *puissance d’agir*. La joie (*laetitia*) est ce qui augmente notre puissance d’exister ; la tristesse (*tristitia*), ce qui la diminue. La régulation, dans cette perspective, n’est donc pas imposition d’un ordre, mais composition d’une dynamique affective collective, qui tend à maximiser les affects joyeux compatibles. Elle repose sur des modulations continues, des ajustements réciproques entre puissances, des configurations mouvantes d’affectation. +Dans le *Traité politique* et le *Traité théologico-politique*, Spinoza +approfondit cette articulation entre affect et structure. Il y développe +une pensée de la multitude comme sujet politique collectif, non pas +unifié par une volonté générale transcendante, mais composé par une +dynamique d'accord partiel, d'harmonisation partielle des *conatus.* Il +écrit ainsi : -53. Dans le *Traité politique* et le *Traité théologico-politique*, Spinoza approfondit cette articulation entre affect et structure. Il y développe une pensée de la multitude comme sujet politique collectif, non pas unifié par une volonté générale transcendante, mais composé par une dynamique d’accord partiel, d’harmonisation partielle des *conatus.* Il écrit ainsi : +« Le Droit Naturel de chaque homme se définit donc non par la saine +Raison, mais par le désir et la puissance. Tous en effet ne sont pas +déterminés naturellement à se comporter suivant les règles et lois de la +Raison ; tous au contraire naissent ignorants de toutes choses et, avant +qu'ils puissent connaître la vraie règle de vie et acquérir l'état de +vertu, la plus grande partie de leur vie s'écoule, même s'ils ont été +bien élevés (...). » (*Tractatus Theologico-Politicus*, chap. XVI, §3). -« Le Droit Naturel de chaque homme se définit donc non par la saine Raison, mais par le désir et la puissance. Tous en effet ne sont pas déterminés naturellement à se comporter suivant les règles et lois de la Raison ; tous au contraire naissent ignorants de toutes choses et, avant qu’ils puissent connaître la vraie règle de vie et acquérir l’état de vertu, la plus grande partie de leur vie s’écoule, même s’ils ont été bien élevés (…). » (*Tractatus Theologico-Politicus*, chap. XVI, §3). +Toutefois, cette dynamique de co-affectation entre puissances ne saurait +être lue de manière naïve ou unanimiste. Spinoza identifie lui-même une +limite décisive : tant que les affects restent passifs, ils ne +permettent aucune régulation stable, mais alimentent au contraire les +formes les plus virulentes de servitude humaine (*servitus humana*). +Superstition, peur, haine, désir de vengeance — autant de passions +tristes qui, selon *Éthique IV*, aliènent les individus et les rendent +manipulables. La co-viabilité ne peut donc surgir spontanément des +conatus affectés : elle exige une conversion des affects passifs en +affects actifs, autrement dit un processus d'autonomisation dans l'agir. +Ce point est crucial dans notre lecture archicratique : sans cette +transformation qualitative de la puissance, toute configuration +affective reste entropique, soumise aux fluctuations émotionnelles et à +la fragmentation du corps social. La simple compatibilité affective ne +saurait suffire à garantir un agencement durable ni opératoire de +régulation. -54. Toutefois, cette dynamique de co-affectation entre puissances ne saurait être lue de manière naïve ou unanimiste. Spinoza identifie lui-même une limite décisive : tant que les affects restent passifs, ils ne permettent aucune régulation stable, mais alimentent au contraire les formes les plus virulentes de servitude humaine (*servitus humana*). Superstition, peur, haine, désir de vengeance — autant de passions tristes qui, selon *Éthique IV*, aliènent les individus et les rendent manipulables. La co-viabilité ne peut donc surgir spontanément des conatus affectés : elle exige une conversion des affects passifs en affects actifs, autrement dit un processus d’autonomisation dans l’agir. Ce point est crucial dans notre lecture archicratique : sans cette transformation qualitative de la puissance, toute configuration affective reste entropique, soumise aux fluctuations émotionnelles et à la fragmentation du corps social. La simple compatibilité affective ne saurait suffire à garantir un agencement durable ni opératoire de régulation. +La co-viabilité, chez Spinoza, ne se fonde donc ni sur l'obéissance ni +sur la verticalité du commandement, mais sur la possibilité pour des +individus affectés de manière compatible d'augmenter mutuellement leur +puissance. Ce que l'État doit garantir, c'est moins l'ordre que la +possibilité de l'affirmation de chacun, dans le cadre d'une composition +des puissances. Spinoza fonde ainsi une régulation intuitive, non +procédurale, non légale, mais incarnée dans des trajectoires affectives +agencées. -55. La co-viabilité, chez Spinoza, ne se fonde donc ni sur l’obéissance ni sur la verticalité du commandement, mais sur la possibilité pour des individus affectés de manière compatible d’augmenter mutuellement leur puissance. Ce que l’État doit garantir, c’est moins l’ordre que la possibilité de l’affirmation de chacun, dans le cadre d’une composition des puissances. Spinoza fonde ainsi une régulation intuitive, non procédurale, non légale, mais incarnée dans des trajectoires affectives agencées. +Dans cette optique, les trois pôles du paradigme archicratique +apparaissent sous une forme inédite. L'arcalité n'est plus transcendante +: elle réside dans la dynamique même du conatus et dans la composition +des puissances. La cratialité ne s'exerce pas par contrainte, mais par +modulation des affects, transformation des passions passives en actions +actives, et compatibilité croissante entre puissances singulières. Quant +à l'archicration, elle se donne comme processus fluide d'individuation +politique : non une instance instituée, mais la capacité d'un corps +social à se composer selon des agencements qui augmentent la puissance +commune. -56. Dans cette optique, les trois pôles du paradigme archicratique apparaissent sous une forme inédite. L’arcalité n’est plus transcendante : elle réside dans la dynamique même du conatus et dans la composition des puissances. La cratialité ne s’exerce pas par contrainte, mais par modulation des affects, transformation des passions passives en actions actives, et compatibilité croissante entre puissances singulières. Quant à l’archicration, elle se donne comme processus fluide d’individuation politique : non une instance instituée, mais la capacité d’un corps social à se composer selon des agencements qui augmentent la puissance commune. - -La force de Spinoza est ici considérable : il libère la régulation des figures autoritaires du commandement et ouvre la voie à une pensée affective, relationnelle et immanente de la co-viabilité. Mais cette force est aussi sa limite. Il ne fournit ni dispositifs stabilisés, ni médiations différenciées, ni architecture explicite permettant de faire durer cette régulation dans des sociétés complexes. Il inspire une archicration intuitive et joyeuse ; il n’en livre pas encore les organes opératoires. +La force de Spinoza est ici considérable : il libère la régulation des +figures autoritaires du commandement et ouvre la voie à une pensée +affective, relationnelle et immanente de la co-viabilité. Mais cette +force est aussi sa limite. Il ne fournit ni dispositifs stabilisés, ni +médiations différenciées, ni architecture explicite permettant de faire +durer cette régulation dans des sociétés complexes. Il inspire une +archicration intuitive et joyeuse ; il n'en livre pas encore les organes +opératoires. ### 3.3.2 — Interdépendance, autocontrainte, configuration : *une régulation morphogénétique* -57. Parmi les penseurs ayant su dégager les logiques régulatrices sans recourir à un sujet souverain, à une normativité transcendante, ou à une rationalité procédurale a priori, Norbert Elias (1897–1990) se distingue par une approche résolument processuelle, historique, relationnelle du pouvoir et de la régulation. Dans *Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation* (*La civilisation des mœurs*, 1939), mais aussi dans *La Société des individus* (1987) et *La dynamique de l’Occident* (1969), Elias opère un double décentrement fondamental : d’une part, il *dissout l’opposition rigide entre individu et société* ; d’autre part, il remplace les structures statiques du pouvoir par des *configurations mouvantes d’interdépendance*. C’est cette substitution, d’un modèle ontologique par un modèle dynamique et morphogénétique, qui fait de sa pensée un jalon déterminant vers l’intelligibilité archicratique. +Parmi les penseurs ayant su dégager les logiques régulatrices sans +recourir à un sujet souverain, à une normativité transcendante, ou à une +rationalité procédurale a priori, Norbert Elias (1897–1990) se +distingue par une approche résolument processuelle, historique, +relationnelle du pouvoir et de la régulation. Dans *Über den Prozeß der +Zivilisation* (*La civilisation des mœurs*, 1939), mais aussi dans *La +Société des individus* (1987) et *La dynamique de l'Occident* (1969), +Elias opère un double décentrement fondamental : d'une part, il *dissout +l'opposition rigide entre individu et société* ; d'autre part, il +remplace les structures statiques du pouvoir par des *configurations +mouvantes d'interdépendance*. C'est cette substitution, d'un modèle +ontologique par un modèle dynamique et morphogénétique, qui fait de sa +pensée un jalon déterminant vers l'intelligibilité archicratique. -58. La notion centrale de configuration désigne un ensemble structuré de relations interdépendantes, dans lequel les positions et les comportements de chaque acteur ne prennent sens que relativement aux autres. Elias invite ainsi à penser les individus comme pris dans des chaînes mouvantes d’interdépendance, plutôt que comme des unités isolées. +La notion centrale de configuration désigne un ensemble structuré de +relations interdépendantes, dans lequel les positions et les +comportements de chaque acteur ne prennent sens que relativement aux +autres. Elias invite ainsi à penser les individus comme pris dans des +chaînes mouvantes d'interdépendance, plutôt que comme des unités +isolées. -59. La régulation, dans cette perspective, n’est pas imposition verticale, mais *résultat de tensions différenciées et d’ajustements progressifs entre agents sociaux interdépendants*. Dans cette perspective, le pouvoir ne réside pas dans une substance détenue par les individus, mais dans la configuration relationnelle elle-même. +La régulation, dans cette perspective, n'est pas imposition verticale, +mais *résultat de tensions différenciées et d'ajustements progressifs +entre agents sociaux interdépendants*. Dans cette perspective, le +pouvoir ne réside pas dans une substance détenue par les individus, mais +dans la configuration relationnelle elle-même. -60. C’est dans ce cadre qu’Elias développe son concept clef d’*auto-compulsion* (*Selbstzwang*) — mécanisme central du processus de civilisation. Là où la régulation s’opérait auparavant par contrainte extérieure, sous forme de surveillance ou de coercition directe, la modernité progressive instaure un *régime d’intériorisation des normes, des conduites et des seuils de tolérance pulsionnelle* : *le contrôle social devient un contrôle de soi*. Cette intériorisation n’est pas spontanée, ni même simplement morale, mais elle est le produit d’une morphogenèse historique lente, issue de la complexification des chaînes d’interdépendance, notamment dans les sphères curiales, bourgeoises, puis étatiques. +C'est dans ce cadre qu'Elias développe son concept clef +d'*auto-compulsion* (*Selbstzwang*) — mécanisme central du processus +de civilisation. Là où la régulation s'opérait auparavant par contrainte +extérieure, sous forme de surveillance ou de coercition directe, la +modernité progressive instaure un *régime d'intériorisation des normes, +des conduites et des seuils de tolérance pulsionnelle* : *le contrôle +social devient un contrôle de soi*. Cette intériorisation n'est pas +spontanée, ni même simplement morale, mais elle est le produit d'une +morphogenèse historique lente, issue de la complexification des chaînes +d'interdépendance, notamment dans les sphères curiales, bourgeoises, +puis étatiques. -61. Autrement dit, l’histoire des sociétés n’est pas celle d’un progrès moral, mais celle d’un déplacement du régime régulateur : de la *cratialité* externe (punitive, spectaculaire, visible) vers une *cratialité intériorisée*, intéroceptive, incorporée dans les habitudes, les comportements, les schèmes de perception et d’émotion. Le processus de civilisation s’accompagne d’une intériorisation croissante des contraintes, qui convertit progressivement la contrainte extérieure en autocontrainte incorporée. +Autrement dit, l'histoire des sociétés n'est pas celle d'un progrès +moral, mais celle d'un déplacement du régime régulateur : de la +*cratialité* externe (punitive, spectaculaire, visible) vers une +*cratialité intériorisée*, intéroceptive, incorporée dans les habitudes, +les comportements, les schèmes de perception et d'émotion. Le processus +de civilisation s'accompagne d'une intériorisation croissante des +contraintes, qui convertit progressivement la contrainte extérieure en +autocontrainte incorporée. -62. Un point mérite toutefois d’être isolé pour sa portée paradigmatique : la fiscalité, ou plus largement l’imposition au double sens du terme. Chez Elias, la consolidation des appareils d’État modernes s’accompagne d’une concentration fiscale qui fait apparaître une forme embryonnaire de régulation archicratique : contrainte codifiée, symboliquement intériorisée, acceptée ou refusée selon les seuils de légitimation affective du pouvoir. L’impôt devient ainsi un test de co-viabilité, révélant la capacité d’un régime à transformer la prédation en contribution et la domination en intégration. +Un point mérite toutefois d'être isolé pour sa portée paradigmatique : +la fiscalité, ou plus largement l'imposition au double sens du terme. +Chez Elias, la consolidation des appareils d'État modernes s'accompagne +d'une concentration fiscale qui fait apparaître une forme embryonnaire +de régulation archicratique : contrainte codifiée, symboliquement +intériorisée, acceptée ou refusée selon les seuils de légitimation +affective du pouvoir. L'impôt devient ainsi un test de co-viabilité, +révélant la capacité d'un régime à transformer la prédation en +contribution et la domination en intégration. -Cette lecture gagne en clarté lorsqu’on la met en tension avec Bourdieu. Là où Elias pense surtout des chaînes d’interdépendance et des morphogenèses relationnelles, Bourdieu formalise davantage les différenciations de positions, de capitaux et de dominations. D’un point de vue archicratique, Elias éclaire remarquablement la genèse lente de l’auto-régulation incorporée ; mais il ne propose ni médiations entre sphères, ni codification des écarts de puissance, ni dispositifs d’ajustement réellement modulaires. Sa pensée demeure décisive pour comprendre la co-formation du social et du psychique, mais elle reste faible dès qu’il s’agit de formaliser une régulation stratifiée, testable et interopérable. +Cette lecture gagne en clarté lorsqu'on la met en tension avec Bourdieu. +Là où Elias pense surtout des chaînes d'interdépendance et des +morphogenèses relationnelles, Bourdieu formalise davantage les +différenciations de positions, de capitaux et de dominations. D'un point +de vue archicratique, Elias éclaire remarquablement la genèse lente de +l'auto-régulation incorporée ; mais il ne propose ni médiations entre +sphères, ni codification des écarts de puissance, ni dispositifs +d'ajustement réellement modulaires. Sa pensée demeure décisive pour +comprendre la co-formation du social et du psychique, mais elle reste +faible dès qu'il s'agit de formaliser une régulation stratifiée, +testable et interopérable. ### 3.3.3 — Transduction, individuation, tension : *une régulation potentielle* -63. Il n’est pas exagéré d’affirmer que Gilbert Simondon (1924–1989) constitue l’un des penseurs les moins invoqués et pourtant parmi les plus importants pour toute tentative de refondation du politique, du technique, du vivant, et — par extension — du régulateur. En faisant de l’*individuation* le processus premier et de la *transduction* le moteur même de la réalité, Simondon ne propose pas une philosophie parmi d’autres, mais une *métaphysique opératoire* de la consistance, du devenir et de la modulation. Dès lors, toute théorie de la régulation qui ne se contente pas d’ordonner des états donnés, mais qui s’efforce de penser la co-viabilité comme processus tensionnel en perpétuelle reconfiguration, ne peut éviter la confrontation à ce qui, chez Simondon, fait *krateîn* sans figure, *arkhè sans instance*, c’est-à-dire : *force d’émergence structurante sans origine assignable*. +Il n'est pas exagéré d'affirmer que Gilbert Simondon (1924–1989) +constitue l'un des penseurs les moins invoqués et pourtant parmi les +plus importants pour toute tentative de refondation du politique, du +technique, du vivant, et — par extension — du régulateur. En faisant +de l'*individuation* le processus premier et de la *transduction* le +moteur même de la réalité, Simondon ne propose pas une philosophie parmi +d'autres, mais une *métaphysique opératoire* de la consistance, du +devenir et de la modulation. Dès lors, toute théorie de la régulation +qui ne se contente pas d'ordonner des états donnés, mais qui s'efforce +de penser la co-viabilité comme processus tensionnel en perpétuelle +reconfiguration, ne peut éviter la confrontation à ce qui, chez +Simondon, fait *krateîn* sans figure, *arkhè sans instance*, +c'est-à-dire : *force d'émergence structurante sans origine assignable*. -64. Dès *L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique* (1958) puis *L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information* (1958–1964), Simondon réfute radicalement le substantialisme ontologique autant que le dualisme classique : il n’y a ni sujet préexistant, ni structure close, mais une tension permanente entre un *pré-individuel* (champ de potentiels métastables) et un *individu* (résultat provisoire de résolutions partielles de tensions). Cette tension est résolue — localement, temporairement — par un processus de *transduction*, c’est-à-dire d’*opération durant laquelle une* *structure se constitue au fil même du passage d’une activité régulatrice, par propagation d’un changement qui module progressivement les conditions du champ*. +Dès *L'individu et sa genèse physico-biologique* (1958) puis +*L'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information* +(1958–1964), Simondon réfute radicalement le substantialisme +ontologique autant que le dualisme classique : il n'y a ni sujet +préexistant, ni structure close, mais une tension permanente entre un +*pré-individuel* (champ de potentiels métastables) et un *individu* +(résultat provisoire de résolutions partielles de tensions). Cette +tension est résolue — localement, temporairement — par un processus +de *transduction*, c'est-à-dire d'*opération durant laquelle une* +*structure se constitue au fil même du passage d'une activité +régulatrice, par propagation d'un changement qui module progressivement +les conditions du champ*. -65. Or, cette pensée de la transduction constitue un apport majeur pour notre paradigme archicratique. Car ce que Simondon rend pensable, c’est une régulation *sans plan préalable*, *sans transcendance organisatrice*, mais *sans anarchie chaotique* non plus : une régulation *processuelle, immanente, opératoire*, qui émerge du couplage dynamique entre un milieu et une singularité en individuation. La structure n’est pas imposée, elle *advient par propagation d’une cohérence locale*, par résolution successive de déséquilibres, selon un *gradient de métastabilité*. Le régulateur n’est pas transcendant, mais ni purement fonctionnel, ni simplement systémique : il est *mise en résolution de tension*, de *phase*, *d’intensité*. +Or, cette pensée de la transduction constitue un apport majeur pour +notre paradigme archicratique. Car ce que Simondon rend pensable, c'est +une régulation *sans plan préalable*, *sans transcendance +organisatrice*, mais *sans anarchie chaotique* non plus : une régulation +*processuelle, immanente, opératoire*, qui émerge du couplage dynamique +entre un milieu et une singularité en individuation. La structure n'est +pas imposée, elle *advient par propagation d'une cohérence locale*, par +résolution successive de déséquilibres, selon un *gradient de +métastabilité*. Le régulateur n'est pas transcendant, mais ni purement +fonctionnel, ni simplement systémique : il est *mise en résolution de +tension*, de *phase*, *d'intensité*. -66. C’est dans ce cadre que s’esquisse la figure d’une *archicration potentielle* : non pas une instance souveraine, mais une *potentialité organisée par propagation d’opérativité*, où l’arkhè n’est pas un commencement mais une *condition d’émergence*, et où le kratos n’est pas une puissance d’imposition mais une *force de cohérence progressive*. La régulation n’est ni hétéronome, ni normative, ni contractuelle : elle est *ontogénétique*. Elle s’écrit dans le tissu même du devenir, à travers des tensions orientées qui structurent *par ajustement différentiel* ce qui advient à mesure qu’il s’individue. +C'est dans ce cadre que s'esquisse la figure d'une *archicration +potentielle* : non pas une instance souveraine, mais une *potentialité +organisée par propagation d'opérativité*, où l'arkhè n'est pas un +commencement mais une *condition d'émergence*, et où le kratos n'est pas +une puissance d'imposition mais une *force de cohérence progressive*. La +régulation n'est ni hétéronome, ni normative, ni contractuelle : elle +est *ontogénétique*. Elle s'écrit dans le tissu même du devenir, à +travers des tensions orientées qui structurent *par ajustement +différentiel* ce qui advient à mesure qu'il s'individue. -67. Penser la co-viabilité à la lumière de Simondon, c’est refuser aussi bien l’extériorité fondatrice que la dissolution relativiste des formes. La transduction rend pensable une régulation sans plan préalable, mais sans chaos : une mise en résolution de tensions au sein d’un champ métastable, par propagation d’opérativité. Avec le milieu associé et la concrétisation technique, Simondon fournit ainsi un modèle puissant de structuration immanente, dans lequel l’ordre n’est pas imposé, mais émerge d’un ajustement progressif entre potentiels incompatibles. +Penser la co-viabilité à la lumière de Simondon, c'est refuser aussi +bien l'extériorité fondatrice que la dissolution relativiste des formes. +La transduction rend pensable une régulation sans plan préalable, mais +sans chaos : une mise en résolution de tensions au sein d'un champ +métastable, par propagation d'opérativité. Avec le milieu associé et la +concrétisation technique, Simondon fournit ainsi un modèle puissant de +structuration immanente, dans lequel l'ordre n'est pas imposé, mais +émerge d'un ajustement progressif entre potentiels incompatibles. -C’est là un apport majeur pour l’Archicratie : la régulation n’est plus un donné politique, mais une forme du devenir. Mais cette fécondité demeure inachevée. Simondon ne formalise ni les passages d’échelle, ni les médiations différenciées nécessaires à la coordination de sphères hétérogènes, ni les dispositifs politiques permettant de rendre cette régulation partageable, révisable et stabilisable dans des sociétés complexes. Il nous donne une ontogénétique de l’archicration potentielle ; il ne nous en livre pas encore l’architecture opératoire. +C'est là un apport majeur pour l'Archicratie : la régulation n'est plus +un donné politique, mais une forme du devenir. Mais cette fécondité +demeure inachevée. Simondon ne formalise ni les passages d'échelle, ni +les médiations différenciées nécessaires à la coordination de sphères +hétérogènes, ni les dispositifs politiques permettant de rendre cette +régulation partageable, révisable et stabilisable dans des sociétés +complexes. Il nous donne une ontogénétique de l'archicration potentielle +; il ne nous en livre pas encore l'architecture opératoire. ### 3.3.4 — Pluralité, natalité, action : *une régulation par émergence* -68. Il est rare qu’une œuvre aussi intensément politique soit, dans son fondement, aussi peu tournée vers l’institution, la structure, ou la souveraineté. Hannah Arendt (1906–1975), dans *La Condition de l’homme moderne* (1961), ou encore *Essai sur la Révolution* (1967), engage un renversement aussi décisif que discret : elle ne cherche pas à fonder le pouvoir, mais à comprendre l’espace dans lequel il peut apparaître — non comme imposition mais comme *co-présence*. Il ne s’agit donc pas, chez elle, de penser le politique comme structure régulatrice, ni même comme mode de gouvernement, mais comme *condition d’apparition* d’un monde commun, au sein d’une pluralité irréductible. +Il est rare qu'une œuvre aussi intensément politique soit, dans son +fondement, aussi peu tournée vers l'institution, la structure, ou la +souveraineté. Hannah Arendt (1906–1975), dans *La Condition de l'homme +moderne* (1961), ou encore *Essai sur la Révolution* (1967), engage un +renversement aussi décisif que discret : elle ne cherche pas à fonder le +pouvoir, mais à comprendre l'espace dans lequel il peut apparaître — non comme imposition mais comme *co-présence*. Il ne s'agit donc pas, +chez elle, de penser le politique comme structure régulatrice, ni même +comme mode de gouvernement, mais comme *condition d'apparition* d'un +monde commun, au sein d'une pluralité irréductible. -69. Le concept fondamental de *natalité* constitue à cet égard le cœur irradiant de sa philosophie politique. Ce n’est pas la mort, mais la naissance, qui inaugure le politique. La capacité de commencer, d’initier, d’apparaître au monde dans une irréductible singularité — telle est, pour Arendt, l’essence de l’action politique. Cette action, par nature *imprévisible*, *irréversible*, *fragile*, ne répond à aucun programme, à aucun plan, à aucun ordre transcendant. Elle ne se déploie que dans l’espace partagé qu’ouvrent ceux qui agissent ensemble, à la première personne du pluriel. Dès lors, toute régulation viable, chez Arendt, ne peut procéder ni d’un surplomb normatif, ni d’une procédure formelle, ni d’un appareil coercitif : elle émerge, ou n’émerge pas, de l’interaction concrète, située, incarnée entre individus. Elle est fondamentalement *relationnelle*. +Le concept fondamental de *natalité* constitue à cet égard le cœur +irradiant de sa philosophie politique. Ce n'est pas la mort, mais la +naissance, qui inaugure le politique. La capacité de commencer, +d'initier, d'apparaître au monde dans une irréductible singularité — telle est, pour Arendt, l'essence de l'action politique. Cette action, +par nature *imprévisible*, *irréversible*, *fragile*, ne répond à aucun +programme, à aucun plan, à aucun ordre transcendant. Elle ne se déploie +que dans l'espace partagé qu'ouvrent ceux qui agissent ensemble, à la +première personne du pluriel. Dès lors, toute régulation viable, chez +Arendt, ne peut procéder ni d'un surplomb normatif, ni d'une procédure +formelle, ni d'un appareil coercitif : elle émerge, ou n'émerge pas, de +l'interaction concrète, située, incarnée entre individus. Elle est +fondamentalement *relationnelle*. -70. Cette pensée de l’action, qui se tient résolument à distance des schèmes de domination, de souveraineté ou de hiérarchie, suppose un autre imaginaire du pouvoir. Arendt ne pense pas en termes de *kratos*, mais d’*arkhè sans autorité* : un commencement toujours fragile, jamais garanti, toujours à réitérer. L’espace politique n’est pas pour elle l’infrastructure institutionnelle d’un État, mais *le théâtre de l’apparition* — un lieu où les êtres humains se montrent, se parlent, se reconnaissent. Le pouvoir ne s’impose pas, il surgit lorsque les individus, par leur parole, engagent un monde commun. Comme elle l’écrit : +Cette pensée de l'action, qui se tient résolument à distance des schèmes +de domination, de souveraineté ou de hiérarchie, suppose un autre +imaginaire du pouvoir. Arendt ne pense pas en termes de *kratos*, mais +d'*arkhè sans autorité* : un commencement toujours fragile, jamais +garanti, toujours à réitérer. L'espace politique n'est pas pour elle +l'infrastructure institutionnelle d'un État, mais *le théâtre de +l'apparition* — un lieu où les êtres humains se montrent, se parlent, +se reconnaissent. Le pouvoir ne s'impose pas, il surgit lorsque les +individus, par leur parole, engagent un monde commun. Comme elle +l'écrit : -71. « L’espace de l’apparaître commence à exister dès que les hommes s’assemblent sur le mode de la parole et de l’action ; il précède par conséquent toute constitution du domaine public et des formes de gouvernement, c’est-à-dire les diverses formes sous lesquelles le domaine public peut s’organiser. Il a ceci de particulier qu’à la différence des espaces qui sont l’œuvre de nos mains, il ne survit pas à l’actualité du mouvement qui l’a vu naître : il disparaît non seulement à la dispersion des hommes — comme dans le cas des catastrophes qui ruinent l’organisation politique d’un peuple —, mais aussi au moment de la disparition ou de l’arrêt des activités elles-mêmes » (*La Condition de l’homme moderne*, Calmann-Lévy, 1961, p. 258). +« L'espace de l'apparaître commence à exister dès que les hommes +s'assemblent sur le mode de la parole et de l'action ; il précède par +conséquent toute constitution du domaine public et des formes de +gouvernement, c'est-à-dire les diverses formes sous lesquelles le +domaine public peut s'organiser. Il a ceci de particulier qu'à la +différence des espaces qui sont l'œuvre de nos mains, il ne survit pas à +l'actualité du mouvement qui l'a vu naître : il disparaît non seulement +à la dispersion des hommes — comme dans le cas des catastrophes qui +ruinent l'organisation politique d'un peuple —, mais aussi au moment +de la disparition ou de l'arrêt des activités elles-mêmes » (*La +Condition de l'homme moderne*, Calmann-Lévy, 1961, p. 258). -72. Dans cette perspective, la régulation ne peut être pensée comme codification, norme, ou dispositif, mais comme *promesse* — engagement dans la durée d’un lien mutuel entre êtres parlants. C’est pour cette raison qu’Arendt mobilise les deux concepts-clés de *pardon* et de *promesse* : le premier permet de dépasser l’irréversibilité de l’action passée, le second de stabiliser une attente partagée dans un avenir incertain. Elle écrit ainsi : +Dans cette perspective, la régulation ne peut être pensée comme +codification, norme, ou dispositif, mais comme *promesse* — engagement +dans la durée d'un lien mutuel entre êtres parlants. C'est pour cette +raison qu'Arendt mobilise les deux concepts-clés de *pardon* et de +*promesse* : le premier permet de dépasser l'irréversibilité de l'action +passée, le second de stabiliser une attente partagée dans un avenir +incertain. Elle écrit ainsi : -« Contre l’imprévisibilité et la chaotique incertitude de l’avenir, le remède se trouve dans la faculté de faire et de tenir des promesses » (*La Condition de l’homme moderne*, Calmann-Lévy, 1961, p. 297). +« Contre l'imprévisibilité et la chaotique incertitude de l'avenir, le +remède se trouve dans la faculté de faire et de tenir des promesses » +(*La Condition de l'homme moderne*, Calmann-Lévy, 1961, p. 297). -73. Cette promesse constitue pour elle une *régulation faible*, sans violence, sans hiérarchie, sans procédure : elle repose sur la confiance, la parole, l’engagement mutuel. +Cette promesse constitue pour elle une *régulation faible*, sans +violence, sans hiérarchie, sans procédure : elle repose sur la +confiance, la parole, l'engagement mutuel. -74. Mais cette faiblesse est à double tranchant. Car si la promesse stabilise dans le petit nombre, elle devient inopérante à mesure que s’étendent les sphères d’interdépendance. Arendt ne pense pas la régulation au-delà de la proximité. Son espace politique est celui de la *polis* grecque, non de la *technosphère globale*. Or, dans une société stratifiée, complexe, hétérogène, interconnectée à des échelles multiples — économique, technique, écologique, symbolique — la parole ne suffit pas. Elle ne se transmet pas sans médium, elle ne se stabilise pas sans relais. La régulation devient, dès lors, inopérante si elle repose uniquement sur l’apparition partagée et le lien éthique. +Mais cette faiblesse est à double tranchant. Car si la promesse +stabilise dans le petit nombre, elle devient inopérante à mesure que +s'étendent les sphères d'interdépendance. Arendt ne pense pas la +régulation au-delà de la proximité. Son espace politique est celui de la +*polis* grecque, non de la *technosphère globale*. Or, dans une société +stratifiée, complexe, hétérogène, interconnectée à des échelles +multiples — économique, technique, écologique, symbolique — la +parole ne suffit pas. Elle ne se transmet pas sans médium, elle ne se +stabilise pas sans relais. La régulation devient, dès lors, inopérante +si elle repose uniquement sur l'apparition partagée et le lien éthique. -75. C’est ici que la pensée arendtienne rencontre sa limite du point de vue archicratique. Sa puissance est considérable : elle repense le politique à partir de la pluralité, de la natalité, de l’apparition et de la promesse, et refuse de réduire le pouvoir à la domination ou à la souveraineté. Elle offre ainsi un sol ontologique précieux à toute pensée de la co-viabilité comme surgissement d’un monde commun. +C'est ici que la pensée arendtienne rencontre sa limite du point de vue +archicratique. Sa puissance est considérable : elle repense le politique +à partir de la pluralité, de la natalité, de l'apparition et de la +promesse, et refuse de réduire le pouvoir à la domination ou à la +souveraineté. Elle offre ainsi un sol ontologique précieux à toute +pensée de la co-viabilité comme surgissement d'un monde commun. -Mais cette même puissance se heurte à une difficulté majeure : Arendt pense l’inauguration, non la stabilisation ; elle pense l’arcalité, non la cratialité modulante ; elle valorise l’apparition, mais refuse presque toujours les médiations, les dispositifs et les architectures qui permettraient à cette apparition de durer dans des sociétés complexes. Elle ouvre un espace archicratique ; elle n’en formalise pas encore les conditions de viabilité durable. +Mais cette même puissance se heurte à une difficulté majeure : Arendt +pense l'inauguration, non la stabilisation ; elle pense l'arcalité, non +la cratialité modulante ; elle valorise l'apparition, mais refuse +presque toujours les médiations, les dispositifs et les architectures +qui permettraient à cette apparition de durer dans des sociétés +complexes. Elle ouvre un espace archicratique ; elle n'en formalise pas +encore les conditions de viabilité durable. -76. Ce n’est qu’en tenant ensemble l’*inauguration* et la *modulation*, l’*apparition* et la *médiation*, la *natalité* et la *viabilité*, que peut s’esquisser une régulation archicratique digne de la complexité du monde contemporain. +Ce n'est qu'en tenant ensemble l'*inauguration* et la *modulation*, +l'*apparition* et la *médiation*, la *natalité* et la *viabilité*, que +peut s'esquisser une régulation archicratique digne de la complexité du +monde contemporain. -77. Ce parcours à travers Spinoza, Elias, Simondon et Arendt n’avait pas pour but de les aligner dans une synthèse artificielle, mais de cartographier, dans leur singularité irréductible, les seuils à partir desquels la régulation devient pensable comme processus de subjectivation, de configuration, d’individuation ou d’apparition. Tous, à leur manière, déplacent la régulation hors de la souveraineté, du formalisme procédural ou de la simple capture structurelle. Tous rendent possible une pensée du commun à partir de la dynamique des affects, des interdépendances, des tensions ou de la pluralité. +Ce parcours à travers Spinoza, Elias, Simondon et Arendt n'avait pas +pour but de les aligner dans une synthèse artificielle, mais de +cartographier, dans leur singularité irréductible, les seuils à partir +desquels la régulation devient pensable comme processus de +subjectivation, de configuration, d'individuation ou d'apparition. Tous, +à leur manière, déplacent la régulation hors de la souveraineté, du +formalisme procédural ou de la simple capture structurelle. Tous rendent +possible une pensée du commun à partir de la dynamique des affects, des +interdépendances, des tensions ou de la pluralité. -Mais aucun ne parvient, à lui seul, à articuler l’ensemble des exigences du paradigme archicratique : une viabilité modulée, une opérativité différenciée, une structuration sans totalisation, une épreuve sans domination. Spinoza pense l’immanence sans l’architecture ; Elias, la morphogenèse sans dispositifs ; Simondon, la transduction sans formalisation politique ; Arendt, l’apparition sans stabilisation médiée. Leur croisement ne produit donc pas une doctrine, mais une cartographie de puissances inachevées à partir desquelles l’Archicratie peut devenir pensable comme forme générative de la régulation. +Mais aucun ne parvient, à lui seul, à articuler l'ensemble des exigences +du paradigme archicratique : une viabilité modulée, une opérativité +différenciée, une structuration sans totalisation, une épreuve sans +domination. Spinoza pense l'immanence sans l'architecture ; Elias, la +morphogenèse sans dispositifs ; Simondon, la transduction sans +formalisation politique ; Arendt, l'apparition sans stabilisation +médiée. Leur croisement ne produit donc pas une doctrine, mais une +cartographie de puissances inachevées à partir desquelles l'Archicratie +peut devenir pensable comme forme générative de la régulation. -C’est depuis ce seuil que s’ouvre la section suivante. Après les régimes de la subjectivation émergente, il faudra désormais interroger les régimes dialogiques de la justification : non plus seulement comment des formes de vie se composent, mais comment elles se rendent mutuellement recevables, justifiables et confrontables dans un espace commun de légitimation. +C'est depuis ce seuil que s'ouvre la section suivante. Après les régimes +de la subjectivation émergente, il faudra désormais interroger les +régimes dialogiques de la justification : non plus seulement comment des +formes de vie se composent, mais comment elles se rendent mutuellement +recevables, justifiables et confrontables dans un espace commun de +légitimation. ## **3.4 — Régimes dialogiques de la justification —** *puissance distribuée* -78. À ce stade de notre exploration des régimes de régulation, un seuil se franchit. Après les architectures fondationnelles du politique, les régulations silencieuses ou incorporées, puis les philosophies de l’émergence subjective et transductive, la présente section aborde un autre régime : celui où la régulation se configure comme travail dialogique de justification, d’épreuve, d’ajustement et de légitimation partagée. Il ne s’agit plus de penser l’ordre depuis une source souveraine, ni depuis une structure diffuse, ni depuis la seule dynamique des affects ou de l’apparition, mais depuis des scènes où les positions doivent se rendre mutuellement recevables, justifiables et confrontables. +À ce stade de notre exploration des régimes de régulation, un seuil se +franchit. Après les architectures fondationnelles du politique, les +régulations silencieuses ou incorporées, puis les philosophies de +l'émergence subjective et transductive, la présente section aborde un +autre régime : celui où la régulation se configure comme travail +dialogique de justification, d'épreuve, d'ajustement et de légitimation +partagée. Il ne s'agit plus de penser l'ordre depuis une source +souveraine, ni depuis une structure diffuse, ni depuis la seule +dynamique des affects ou de l'apparition, mais depuis des scènes où les +positions doivent se rendre mutuellement recevables, justifiables et +confrontables. -Le geste ici engagé est dialogique au sens fort. La régulation n’y repose ni sur la verticalité d’une décision, ni sur l’évidence d’une norme, ni sur l’implicite d’une structure, mais sur la mise en tension explicite de régimes de valeur, de formats d’épreuve, de grandeurs et de perspectives hétérogènes. La puissance y devient distribuée : elle se fragmente, se ralentit, s’expose, se confronte. L’arkhê n’y est plus transcendante, mais située ; le krateîn n’y est plus déployé sans entrave, mais soumis à l’épreuve ; l’archicration, enfin, y prend la forme d’un travail différencié de composition réflexive. +Le geste ici engagé est dialogique au sens fort. La régulation n'y +repose ni sur la verticalité d'une décision, ni sur l'évidence d'une +norme, ni sur l'implicite d'une structure, mais sur la mise en tension +explicite de régimes de valeur, de formats d'épreuve, de grandeurs et de +perspectives hétérogènes. La puissance y devient distribuée : elle se +fragmente, se ralentit, s'expose, se confronte. L'arkhê n'y est plus +transcendante, mais située ; le krateîn n'y est plus déployé sans +entrave, mais soumis à l'épreuve ; l'archicration, enfin, y prend la +forme d'un travail différencié de composition réflexive. -C’est dans cette perspective que seront ici traversés Montesquieu, Boltanski et Thévenot, Latour, Stengers et Morin. Tous proposent, selon des voies distinctes, une pensée de la régulation distribuée : équilibre dynamique des puissances, mondes de justification, diplomatie des existants, ralentissement cosmopolitique, écologie dialogique du lien. Aucun ne livre à lui seul un modèle achevé de co-viabilité ; tous ouvrent cependant des ressources majeures pour penser une archicration réflexive, révisable et pluralisée. C’est cette fécondité, mais aussi ces limites, que cette section se propose d’éprouver. +C'est dans cette perspective que seront ici traversés Montesquieu, +Boltanski et Thévenot, Latour, Stengers et Morin. Tous proposent, selon +des voies distinctes, une pensée de la régulation distribuée : équilibre +dynamique des puissances, mondes de justification, diplomatie des +existants, ralentissement cosmopolitique, écologie dialogique du lien. +Aucun ne livre à lui seul un modèle achevé de co-viabilité ; tous +ouvrent cependant des ressources majeures pour penser une archicration +réflexive, révisable et pluralisée. C'est cette fécondité, mais aussi +ces limites, que cette section se propose d'éprouver. ### 3.4.1 — Invention de la disposition modérée *— une régulation par équilibre des puissances* -79. Si l’histoire des régimes politiques occidentaux s’est longtemps écrite au prisme de la souveraineté, de l’absolu monarchique, ou des transitions contractuelles, peu d’auteurs ont su, comme *Montesquieu* (1689–1755), penser la régulation non à partir de l’origine du pouvoir, mais de son *équilibre en tension*. Contre les modèles d’un pouvoir unifié, indifférencié, centralisé, *L’Esprit des lois* (1748) opère un renversement irremplaçable : ce n’est plus la fondation du pouvoir qui compte, mais son organisation dans un *dispositif de modération réciproque*. L’originalité profonde de Montesquieu ne réside pas seulement dans sa défense de la séparation des pouvoirs — aujourd’hui institutionnalisée dans la plupart des régimes démocratiques — mais dans son intuition d’une *disposition modérante des forces sociales, politiques et juridiques, qui anticipe avec une étonnante acuité les fondements d’une archicration équilibrée*, c’est-à-dire d’une *régulation par différenciation dynamique, confrontée, réflexive*. +Si l'histoire des régimes politiques occidentaux s'est longtemps écrite +au prisme de la souveraineté, de l'absolu monarchique, ou des +transitions contractuelles, peu d'auteurs ont su, comme *Montesquieu* +(1689–1755), penser la régulation non à partir de l'origine du pouvoir, +mais de son *équilibre en tension*. Contre les modèles d'un pouvoir +unifié, indifférencié, centralisé, *L'Esprit des lois* (1748) opère un +renversement irremplaçable : ce n'est plus la fondation du pouvoir qui +compte, mais son organisation dans un *dispositif de modération +réciproque*. L'originalité profonde de Montesquieu ne réside pas +seulement dans sa défense de la séparation des pouvoirs — aujourd'hui +institutionnalisée dans la plupart des régimes démocratiques — mais +dans son intuition d'une *disposition modérante des forces sociales, +politiques et juridiques, qui anticipe avec une étonnante acuité les +fondements d'une archicration équilibrée*, c'est-à-dire d'une +*régulation par différenciation dynamique, confrontée, réflexive*. -80. Ce qui frappe d’abord dans la philosophie politique de Montesquieu, c’est l’abandon radical de toute transcendance fondatrice du pouvoir. Là où les théories classiques — de Bodin à Hobbes — mobilisent une instance souveraine ultime, une *arkhê* absolue garante de l’ordre, Montesquieu inscrit l’autorité dans le mouvement même des corps politiques, dans leur agencement, leur contrepoids, leur articulation. Ainsi écrit-il, dans un passage cardinal : +Ce qui frappe d'abord dans la philosophie politique de Montesquieu, +c'est l'abandon radical de toute transcendance fondatrice du pouvoir. Là +où les théories classiques — de Bodin à Hobbes — mobilisent une +instance souveraine ultime, une *arkhê* absolue garante de l'ordre, +Montesquieu inscrit l'autorité dans le mouvement même des corps +politiques, dans leur agencement, leur contrepoids, leur articulation. +Ainsi écrit-il, dans un passage cardinal : -« Pour qu’on ne puisse abuser du pouvoir, il faut que, par la disposition des choses, le pouvoir arrête le pouvoir. » (*De l’esprit des lois*, XI, 4) +« Pour qu'on ne puisse abuser du pouvoir, il faut que, par la +disposition des choses, le pouvoir arrête le pouvoir. » (*De l'esprit +des lois*, XI, 4) -81. Par cette formule, souvent répétée, mais rarement comprise dans toute sa portée ontopolitique, Montesquieu énonce une *loi de tension constitutive* : le pouvoir n’est pas à conjurer, ni à déléguer, ni à diviniser ; il est à *modérer* *par d’autres puissances*, selon une *logique structurelle d’auto-contrôle différentiel*. L’*arkhê* n’est plus ici un point d’origine absolu, mais une forme relative, *distribuée dans des structures institutionnelles* (exécutif, législatif, judiciaire), elles-mêmes portées par des passions, des intérêts, des affects, des volontés sociales. Il s’agit moins de distribuer des fonctions que de maintenir une *friction régulatrice*, garante de la liberté politique. +Par cette formule, souvent répétée, mais rarement comprise dans toute sa +portée ontopolitique, Montesquieu énonce une *loi de tension +constitutive* : le pouvoir n'est pas à conjurer, ni à déléguer, ni à +diviniser ; il est à *modérer* *par d'autres puissances*, selon une +*logique structurelle d'auto-contrôle différentiel*. L'*arkhê* n'est +plus ici un point d'origine absolu, mais une forme relative, *distribuée +dans des structures institutionnelles* (exécutif, législatif, +judiciaire), elles-mêmes portées par des passions, des intérêts, des +affects, des volontés sociales. Il s'agit moins de distribuer des +fonctions que de maintenir une *friction régulatrice*, garante de la +liberté politique. -82. Cette philosophie de l’équilibre n’est pas une abstraction constitutionnelle : elle s’ancre dans une vision historique, géopolitique et anthropologique rigoureuse. Montesquieu observe, compare, cartographie. Il ne théorise pas *ex nihilo*, mais à partir de *formes vivantes de régulation*. L’Angleterre — référence majeure de son œuvre — lui apparaît comme l’exemple d’un système où les forces s’équilibrent sans s’annuler, où la liberté résulte moins d’un droit naturel que d’un jeu d’ajustement entre la Couronne, le Parlement, les magistratures. Ce que propose Montesquieu, ce n’est donc pas une utopie rationnelle, mais une *mécanique subtile de la viabilité politique*, où le maintien du lien social suppose des *agencements réglés mais ouverts, tendus mais stables, différenciés mais corrélés*. +Cette philosophie de l'équilibre n'est pas une abstraction +constitutionnelle : elle s'ancre dans une vision historique, +géopolitique et anthropologique rigoureuse. Montesquieu observe, +compare, cartographie. Il ne théorise pas *ex nihilo*, mais à partir de +*formes vivantes de régulation*. L'Angleterre — référence majeure de +son œuvre — lui apparaît comme l'exemple d'un système où les forces +s'équilibrent sans s'annuler, où la liberté résulte moins d'un droit +naturel que d'un jeu d'ajustement entre la Couronne, le Parlement, les +magistratures. Ce que propose Montesquieu, ce n'est donc pas une utopie +rationnelle, mais une *mécanique subtile de la viabilité politique*, où +le maintien du lien social suppose des *agencements réglés mais ouverts, +tendus mais stables, différenciés mais corrélés*. -83. Dans cette perspective, la *cratialité*, chez Montesquieu, est centrale mais toujours *contenue*. Il reconnaît pleinement la force des passions politiques, des désirs d’accumulation, des volontés de domination. Il ne nie pas l’existence du *kratos*, mais il le pense comme devant être *modéré*, *inhibé*, *refléchi par une structure ordonnatrice*. Ainsi, la *cratialité* n’est pas ici déchaînée (comme chez Machiavel), ni dissoute dans l’intérêt général (comme chez Rousseau), mais *canalisée par la disposition des pouvoirs*. Elle se déploie dans des formes différenciées — la noblesse, la magistrature, le peuple, le roi — dont chacune contient une part de pouvoir, mais aucune ne saurait l’absorber toute entière. Ce partage, loin d’être égalitaire au sens moderne, constitue néanmoins un *principe fondamental de régulation viable* : c’est parce que les puissances sont hétérogènes, disjointes, et maintenues en tension, qu’une stabilité peut émerger. +Dans cette perspective, la *cratialité*, chez Montesquieu, est centrale +mais toujours *contenue*. Il reconnaît pleinement la force des passions +politiques, des désirs d'accumulation, des volontés de domination. Il ne +nie pas l'existence du *kratos*, mais il le pense comme devant être +*modéré*, *inhibé*, *refléchi par une structure ordonnatrice*. Ainsi, la +*cratialité* n'est pas ici déchaînée (comme chez Machiavel), ni dissoute +dans l'intérêt général (comme chez Rousseau), mais *canalisée par la +disposition des pouvoirs*. Elle se déploie dans des formes différenciées — la noblesse, la magistrature, le peuple, le roi — dont chacune +contient une part de pouvoir, mais aucune ne saurait l'absorber toute +entière. Ce partage, loin d'être égalitaire au sens moderne, constitue +néanmoins un *principe fondamental de régulation viable* : c'est parce +que les puissances sont hétérogènes, disjointes, et maintenues en +tension, qu'une stabilité peut émerger. -84. Quant à l’*arcalité*, Montesquieu la réinvente. Il ne propose pas un ordre fondé sur un pacte (comme Rousseau), ni sur une décision (comme Schmitt), mais sur une *disposition des choses* : autrement dit, une architecture politique sans sujet transcendant, mais avec des *formes instituées différenciées*. L’ordre n’est pas posé par une volonté, mais émerge d’un certain type de composition. C’est un ordre qui se stabilise, non parce qu’il est imposé, mais parce qu’il est *équilibré*. L’*arkhê*, dès lors, devient *modérante*, *structurelle* plutôt que fondatrice, orientée vers la *préservation des conditions de viabilité du corps politique*. C’est une *arcalité relative, distributive, ouverte à la révision*. +Quant à l'*arcalité*, Montesquieu la réinvente. Il ne propose pas un +ordre fondé sur un pacte (comme Rousseau), ni sur une décision (comme +Schmitt), mais sur une *disposition des choses* : autrement dit, une +architecture politique sans sujet transcendant, mais avec des *formes +instituées différenciées*. L'ordre n'est pas posé par une volonté, mais +émerge d'un certain type de composition. C'est un ordre qui se +stabilise, non parce qu'il est imposé, mais parce qu'il est *équilibré*. +L'*arkhê*, dès lors, devient *modérante*, *structurelle* plutôt que +fondatrice, orientée vers la *préservation des conditions de viabilité +du corps politique*. C'est une *arcalité relative, distributive, ouverte +à la révision*. -85. C’est sur le plan de l’archicration que la fécondité de Montesquieu apparaît le plus nettement. La régulation qu’il propose n’est ni silencieuse, ni diffuse, ni ontologique : elle est explicitement organisée comme mise en tension, mise en balance, confrontation réglée des puissances. Certes, cette architecture demeure encore largement formelle et laisse dans l’ombre les inégalités sociales, les dominations économiques ou les asymétries coloniales. Mais elle anticipe déjà une idée décisive pour notre paradigme : aucune instance ne saurait réguler seule sans être, en retour, exposée à une autre force capable de la contenir. +C'est sur le plan de l'archicration que la fécondité de Montesquieu +apparaît le plus nettement. La régulation qu'il propose n'est ni +silencieuse, ni diffuse, ni ontologique : elle est explicitement +organisée comme mise en tension, mise en balance, confrontation réglée +des puissances. Certes, cette architecture demeure encore largement +formelle et laisse dans l'ombre les inégalités sociales, les dominations +économiques ou les asymétries coloniales. Mais elle anticipe déjà une +idée décisive pour notre paradigme : aucune instance ne saurait réguler +seule sans être, en retour, exposée à une autre force capable de la +contenir. -En ce sens, Montesquieu est sans doute le premier penseur moderne d’une co-viabilité politique par différenciation structurée. Il ne cherche ni à fusionner les puissances, ni à les soumettre à une volonté unique, ni à les neutraliser, mais à les maintenir dans un état de tension modératrice. Sa limite demeure nette : il pense l’ajustement des forces, non leur transformation critique ; il organise l’existant, sans encore ouvrir pleinement la scène où les formes de légitimité elles-mêmes pourraient entrer en concurrence. Mais c’est précisément cette matrice — pluralité de l’arcalité, distribution de la cratialité, archicration réfléchie — qui prépare l’entrée dans les régimes dialogiques de la justification. +En ce sens, Montesquieu est sans doute le premier penseur moderne d'une +co-viabilité politique par différenciation structurée. Il ne cherche ni +à fusionner les puissances, ni à les soumettre à une volonté unique, ni +à les neutraliser, mais à les maintenir dans un état de tension +modératrice. Sa limite demeure nette : il pense l'ajustement des forces, +non leur transformation critique ; il organise l'existant, sans encore +ouvrir pleinement la scène où les formes de légitimité elles-mêmes +pourraient entrer en concurrence. Mais c'est précisément cette matrice — pluralité de l'arcalité, distribution de la cratialité, archicration +réfléchie — qui prépare l'entrée dans les régimes dialogiques de la +justification. ### 3.4.2 — Mondes sociaux, grandeurs, épreuves — *une* *régulation modulaire ajustée* -86. Parmi les contributions majeures à la refondation de notre compréhension des régimes de légitimité, des formes de justification et des modalités concrètes de régulation du lien social dans les sociétés pluralistes modernes, l’œuvre conjointe de Luc Boltanski et Laurent Thévenot s’impose comme une référence structurante. Leur ouvrage fondateur *De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur* (Gallimard, 1991) ne constitue nullement un simple traité de sociologie morale ou une typologie classificatoire de formes de jugement social. Il engage bien davantage une mutation paradigmatique dans notre manière de concevoir la régulation collective : en substituant à une conception unitaire de la justice une grammaire pluraliste des épreuves, il opère une rupture radicale avec les modèles juridiques normatifs et les théories du consensus transcendantal. +Parmi les contributions majeures à la refondation de notre compréhension +des régimes de légitimité, des formes de justification et des modalités +concrètes de régulation du lien social dans les sociétés pluralistes +modernes, l'œuvre conjointe de Luc Boltanski et Laurent Thévenot +s'impose comme une référence structurante. Leur ouvrage fondateur *De la +justification. Les économies de la grandeur* (Gallimard, 1991) ne +constitue nullement un simple traité de sociologie morale ou une +typologie classificatoire de formes de jugement social. Il engage bien +davantage une mutation paradigmatique dans notre manière de concevoir la +régulation collective : en substituant à une conception unitaire de la +justice une grammaire pluraliste des épreuves, il opère une rupture +radicale avec les modèles juridiques normatifs et les théories du +consensus transcendantal. -87. Cette œuvre propose ainsi une modélisation inédite du lien social comme configuration dialogique, où l’accord ne résulte ni d’une fusion affective (comme dans certaines approches communautariennes), ni d’une imposition unilatérale (comme dans les régimes souverainistes ou techno-normatifs), mais d’un travail réflexif d’ajustement, de mise en compatibilité, de traduction mutuelle entre des *mondes* ou *cités* de référence dotés chacun de leur propre cohérence normative. En cela, cette pensée de la justification ouvre un espace théorique fondamental pour penser une *archicration distribuée, différenciée, modulaire, situé*e — autrement dit, une *régulation en tension, procédurale, pragmatique, et orientée vers la co-viabilité différenciée*. +Cette œuvre propose ainsi une modélisation inédite du lien social comme +configuration dialogique, où l'accord ne résulte ni d'une fusion +affective (comme dans certaines approches communautariennes), ni d'une +imposition unilatérale (comme dans les régimes souverainistes ou +techno-normatifs), mais d'un travail réflexif d'ajustement, de mise en +compatibilité, de traduction mutuelle entre des *mondes* ou *cités* de +référence dotés chacun de leur propre cohérence normative. En cela, +cette pensée de la justification ouvre un espace théorique fondamental +pour penser une *archicration distribuée, différenciée, modulaire, +situé*e — autrement dit, une *régulation en tension, procédurale, +pragmatique, et orientée vers la co-viabilité différenciée*. -88. Le cœur de la théorie élaborée par Boltanski et Thévenot tient dans une hypothèse décisive : les sociétés modernes ne reposent pas sur un ordre normatif unique, mais sur une pluralité de mondes de justification, chacun doté de ses propres principes de grandeur, de ses êtres légitimes, de ses objets, de ses épreuves et de ses formats de validité. Dès lors, la régulation ne peut plus être pensée comme application linéaire d’une norme centrale, mais comme ajustement toujours fragile entre des logiques de légitimation hétérogènes. Le monde social apparaît ainsi comme un espace de coexistence conflictuelle entre ordres de grandeur partiellement irréductibles, dont les accords, les conflits et les compromis dépendent de scènes d’épreuve où les justifications sont publiquement convoquées, comparées et mises à l’essai. +Le cœur de la théorie élaborée par Boltanski et Thévenot tient dans une +hypothèse décisive : les sociétés modernes ne reposent pas sur un ordre +normatif unique, mais sur une pluralité de mondes de justification, +chacun doté de ses propres principes de grandeur, de ses êtres +légitimes, de ses objets, de ses épreuves et de ses formats de validité. +Dès lors, la régulation ne peut plus être pensée comme application +linéaire d'une norme centrale, mais comme ajustement toujours fragile +entre des logiques de légitimation hétérogènes. Le monde social apparaît +ainsi comme un espace de coexistence conflictuelle entre ordres de +grandeur partiellement irréductibles, dont les accords, les conflits et +les compromis dépendent de scènes d'épreuve où les justifications sont +publiquement convoquées, comparées et mises à l'essai. -C’est là leur apport majeur pour une lecture archicratique du politique : l’espace de la régulation n’est plus défini par la seule institution, ni par la structure silencieuse, ni par l’affect, mais par des moments où l’accord cesse d’aller de soi et où les acteurs doivent rendre leurs positions recevables dans un espace partagé. La régulation devient alors travail dialogique de compatibilité provisoire entre mondes concurrents, non suppression des désaccords. +C'est là leur apport majeur pour une lecture archicratique du politique +: l'espace de la régulation n'est plus défini par la seule institution, +ni par la structure silencieuse, ni par l'affect, mais par des moments +où l'accord cesse d'aller de soi et où les acteurs doivent rendre leurs +positions recevables dans un espace partagé. La régulation devient alors +travail dialogique de compatibilité provisoire entre mondes concurrents, +non suppression des désaccords. -89. L’espace de la régulation n’est plus défini par l’institution (comme chez Rousseau ou Schmitt), ni par la structure silencieuse (comme chez Foucault ou Bourdieu), ni par l’affect ontologique (comme chez Rosa), mais par l’*interaction critique située*, dans laquelle les subjectivités déploient leur capacité à convoquer, comparer, articuler — ou mettre en défaut — les formats normatifs disponibles. Par là, Boltanski et Thévenot offrent les fondements d’une *grammaire de la régulation par différenciation dialogique*, où la co-viabilité se construit non par élimination des conflits, mais par la *reconnaissance structurée de leur pluralité*. +L'espace de la régulation n'est plus défini par l'institution (comme +chez Rousseau ou Schmitt), ni par la structure silencieuse (comme chez +Foucault ou Bourdieu), ni par l'affect ontologique (comme chez Rosa), +mais par l'*interaction critique située*, dans laquelle les +subjectivités déploient leur capacité à convoquer, comparer, articuler — ou mettre en défaut — les formats normatifs disponibles. Par là, +Boltanski et Thévenot offrent les fondements d'une *grammaire de la +régulation par différenciation dialogique*, où la co-viabilité se +construit non par élimination des conflits, mais par la *reconnaissance +structurée de leur pluralité*. -90. L’approche de Boltanski et Thévenot est décisive pour l’Archicratie parce qu’elle déplace la régulation vers la scène même de l’épreuve critique. Les acteurs n’y sont ni de simples porteurs de structures, ni des sujets souverains, mais des êtres capables de justification, de déplacement entre mondes, de mobilisation de grandeurs différentes selon les situations. Il en résulte une forme de cratialité dialogique : une puissance de faire valoir, de comparer, de mettre en tension des régimes de légitimité sans les réduire à une norme unique. Corrélativement, l’arcalité cesse d’être transcendante pour devenir distributive, située, révisable, inscrite dans des formats d’épreuve et des mondes de validité différenciés. Quant à l’archicration, elle prend ici la forme d’une régulation située, construite dans la confrontation visible des justifications et dans la recherche de compromis toujours partiels. +L'approche de Boltanski et Thévenot est décisive pour l'Archicratie +parce qu'elle déplace la régulation vers la scène même de l'épreuve +critique. Les acteurs n'y sont ni de simples porteurs de structures, ni +des sujets souverains, mais des êtres capables de justification, de +déplacement entre mondes, de mobilisation de grandeurs différentes selon +les situations. Il en résulte une forme de cratialité dialogique : une +puissance de faire valoir, de comparer, de mettre en tension des régimes +de légitimité sans les réduire à une norme unique. Corrélativement, +l'arcalité cesse d'être transcendante pour devenir distributive, située, +révisable, inscrite dans des formats d'épreuve et des mondes de validité +différenciés. Quant à l'archicration, elle prend ici la forme d'une +régulation située, construite dans la confrontation visible des +justifications et dans la recherche de compromis toujours partiels. -Cette puissance a toutefois sa limite. Le modèle suppose encore un espace civique relativement stable, des acteurs capables d’argumentation reconnue, et une scène où les asymétries n’empêchent pas entièrement la comparabilité des mondes. Il prend donc insuffisamment en charge les zones d’injustifiabilité structurelle, les conflits trop dissymétriques pour devenir épreuves recevables, ou les situations où la scène elle-même est refusée, capturée ou rendue impraticable. C’est pourquoi leur œuvre doit être prolongée plutôt que simplement reprise : elle fournit une matrice majeure de régulation pluraliste, mais non encore une théorie complète des conditions archicratiques de la co-viabilité. +Cette puissance a toutefois sa limite. Le modèle suppose encore un +espace civique relativement stable, des acteurs capables d'argumentation +reconnue, et une scène où les asymétries n'empêchent pas entièrement la +comparabilité des mondes. Il prend donc insuffisamment en charge les +zones d'injustifiabilité structurelle, les conflits trop dissymétriques +pour devenir épreuves recevables, ou les situations où la scène +elle-même est refusée, capturée ou rendue impraticable. C'est pourquoi +leur œuvre doit être prolongée plutôt que simplement reprise : elle +fournit une matrice majeure de régulation pluraliste, mais non encore +une théorie complète des conditions archicratiques de la co-viabilité. ### 3.4.3 — Réseaux hybrides, symétrie, diplomatie — *une régulation distribuée* -91. « *Nous n’avons jamais été modernes* » — cette formule inaugurale, que Bruno Latour érige en axiome dès le titre de son ouvrage phare publié en 1991 (*Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique*, Paris, La Découverte), n’est pas une provocation rhétorique mais une déflagration ontologique qui oblige à revisiter de fond en comble l’édifice conceptuel sur lequel repose la modernité occidentale. Latour y démonte, pièce par pièce, ce qu’il nomme la *Constitution Moderne* — soit le système de séparation, d’épuration et de double régime (métaphysique et politique) ayant organisé, depuis le XVIIe siècle, la division entre nature et société, faits et valeurs, objets et sujets, techniques et cultures. Cette modernité, loin d’avoir opéré une maîtrise rationnelle du monde, aurait au contraire multiplié les hybrides tout en les dissimulant sous une grille de lecture purificatrice. Ce que Latour appelle *le Grand Partage* (entre humain et non-humain) n’a jamais eu lieu — ou plutôt, il n’a fonctionné qu’en surface, comme fable justificatrice d’un monde en réalité toujours *composite*, *enchevêtré*, *proliférant*. +« *Nous n'avons jamais été modernes* » — cette formule inaugurale, que +Bruno Latour érige en axiome dès le titre de son ouvrage phare publié en +1991 (*Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie +symétrique*, Paris, La Découverte), n'est pas une provocation rhétorique +mais une déflagration ontologique qui oblige à revisiter de fond en +comble l'édifice conceptuel sur lequel repose la modernité occidentale. +Latour y démonte, pièce par pièce, ce qu'il nomme la *Constitution +Moderne* — soit le système de séparation, d'épuration et de double +régime (métaphysique et politique) ayant organisé, depuis le XVIIe +siècle, la division entre nature et société, faits et valeurs, objets et +sujets, techniques et cultures. Cette modernité, loin d'avoir opéré une +maîtrise rationnelle du monde, aurait au contraire multiplié les +hybrides tout en les dissimulant sous une grille de lecture +purificatrice. Ce que Latour appelle *le Grand Partage* (entre humain et +non-humain) n'a jamais eu lieu — ou plutôt, il n'a fonctionné qu'en +surface, comme fable justificatrice d'un monde en réalité toujours +*composite*, *enchevêtré*, *proliférant*. -92. C’est sur cette base que Latour construit l’édifice théorique le plus innovant, peut-être, des dernières décennies dans le champ des sciences sociales : la *théorie de l’acteur-réseau* (Actor-Network Theory, ou ANT). Cette théorie, codéveloppée avec Michel Callon, Madeleine Akrich et les chercheurs du Centre de sociologie de l’innovation (CSI), ne postule plus une société comme système, ni une politique comme sphère, ni un pouvoir comme verticalité. Elle propose une ontologie relationnelle de la co-présence, où l’ordre collectif ne préexiste jamais à son assemblage. En d’autres termes : il n’y a pas de société *déjà là* ; il n’y a que des *associations provisoires d’actants* — humains, non-humains, discours, objets, dispositifs, institutions — dont la stabilisation temporaire constitue ce que nous nommons un *ordre*. L’acteur lui-même ne préexiste pas au réseau : il en est le produit, l’effet, le nœud. L’architecture sociale devient un tissage, un maillage, un entrelacs — et non plus une pyramide ou un corps organique. +C'est sur cette base que Latour construit l'édifice théorique le plus +innovant, peut-être, des dernières décennies dans le champ des sciences +sociales : la *théorie de l'acteur-réseau* (Actor-Network Theory, ou +ANT). Cette théorie, codéveloppée avec Michel Callon, Madeleine Akrich +et les chercheurs du Centre de sociologie de l'innovation (CSI), ne +postule plus une société comme système, ni une politique comme sphère, +ni un pouvoir comme verticalité. Elle propose une ontologie +relationnelle de la co-présence, où l'ordre collectif ne préexiste +jamais à son assemblage. En d'autres termes : il n'y a pas de société +*déjà là* ; il n'y a que des *associations provisoires d'actants* — humains, non-humains, discours, objets, dispositifs, institutions — dont la stabilisation temporaire constitue ce que nous nommons un +*ordre*. L'acteur lui-même ne préexiste pas au réseau : il en est le +produit, l'effet, le nœud. L'architecture sociale devient un tissage, un +maillage, un entrelacs — et non plus une pyramide ou un corps +organique. -93. Ce basculement épistémologique est fondamental pour notre thèse sur l’*Archicratie*. Car ce que Latour propose, c’est une pensée non souveraine de la régulation : une régulation sans fondement transcendant, sans source unique, sans norme a priori. Une régulation qui ne résulte pas d’une autorité supérieure, mais de la mise en forme *distribuée*, *située*, *négociée* des interdépendances entre entités hétérogènes. Le concept de *traduction*, central dans l’ANT, désigne ce travail de médiation par lequel des entités auparavant disjointes (un chercheur, un artefact technique, une problématique sociale, un protocole expérimental) sont mises en relation et deviennent, par cette opération, porteuses de contraintes réciproques. La régulation devient alors l’effet différé d’une *co-fabrication active du monde* — et non l’application d’une règle universelle ou l’imposition d’un pouvoir vertical. +Ce basculement épistémologique est fondamental pour notre thèse sur +l'*Archicratie*. Car ce que Latour propose, c'est une pensée non +souveraine de la régulation : une régulation sans fondement +transcendant, sans source unique, sans norme a priori. Une régulation +qui ne résulte pas d'une autorité supérieure, mais de la mise en forme +*distribuée*, *située*, *négociée* des interdépendances entre entités +hétérogènes. Le concept de *traduction*, central dans l'ANT, désigne ce +travail de médiation par lequel des entités auparavant disjointes (un +chercheur, un artefact technique, une problématique sociale, un +protocole expérimental) sont mises en relation et deviennent, par cette +opération, porteuses de contraintes réciproques. La régulation devient +alors l'effet différé d'une *co-fabrication active du monde* — et non +l'application d'une règle universelle ou l'imposition d'un pouvoir +vertical. -94. Dans *La science en action* (1987), Latour propose une sociologie de la connaissance scientifique qui inverse le modèle classique de la véridiction : la vérité n’est plus une propriété abstraite des énoncés, mais une *performance stabilisée* au terme d’une chaîne d’épreuves, de traductions, de validations matérielles et sociales. Le savoir n’émerge pas d’un sujet rationnel, mais d’un agencement collectif d’énonciation — télescopes, instruments de mesure, schémas, tableaux de données, revues à comité de lecture, colloques scientifiques, controverses publiques. Ce que Latour appelle la *symétrie généralisée* impose de traiter de la même manière les explications qui réussissent et celles qui échouent, les faits scientifiques et les croyances, les laboratoires et les forums politiques : non pas pour les relativiser, mais pour décrire *comment* s’opère la construction des vérités dans un monde peuplé d’êtres composites. +Dans *La science en action* (1987), Latour propose une sociologie de la +connaissance scientifique qui inverse le modèle classique de la +véridiction : la vérité n'est plus une propriété abstraite des énoncés, +mais une *performance stabilisée* au terme d'une chaîne d'épreuves, de +traductions, de validations matérielles et sociales. Le savoir n'émerge +pas d'un sujet rationnel, mais d'un agencement collectif d'énonciation — télescopes, instruments de mesure, schémas, tableaux de données, +revues à comité de lecture, colloques scientifiques, controverses +publiques. Ce que Latour appelle la *symétrie généralisée* impose de +traiter de la même manière les explications qui réussissent et celles +qui échouent, les faits scientifiques et les croyances, les laboratoires +et les forums politiques : non pas pour les relativiser, mais pour +décrire *comment* s'opère la construction des vérités dans un monde +peuplé d'êtres composites. -95. Cette approche, qui déstabilise les épistémologies classiques, résonne profondément avec l’hypothèse archicratique : la régulation n’est pas ce qui vient après l’action pour en corriger les excès, elle est ce qui rend possible la co-existence d’acteurs hétérogènes dans des formats d’épreuve partagés. Dans une perspective latourienne, on ne gouverne pas un collectif ; on *compose* un agencement. Et cette composition est toujours *diplomatique*, *fragile*, *provisoire*, exposée aux dissonances et aux crises. +Cette approche, qui déstabilise les épistémologies classiques, résonne +profondément avec l'hypothèse archicratique : la régulation n'est pas ce +qui vient après l'action pour en corriger les excès, elle est ce qui +rend possible la co-existence d'acteurs hétérogènes dans des formats +d'épreuve partagés. Dans une perspective latourienne, on ne gouverne pas +un collectif ; on *compose* un agencement. Et cette composition est +toujours *diplomatique*, *fragile*, *provisoire*, exposée aux +dissonances et aux crises. -96. Dans *Politiques de la nature* (1999), Latour radicalise encore cette intuition en formulant une théorie politique qui dépasse à la fois la démocratie représentative classique et l’écologie institutionnelle. Il y déploie ce qu’il appelle une *constitution cosmopolitique*, un *Parlement des choses*, dans lequel les entités non-humaines — fleuves, animaux, virus, objets techniques, atmosphères — sont représentées dans la délibération politique. Mais cette représentation ne va pas de soi : elle requiert des *porte-paroles*, des formats d’épreuve, des chaînes de légitimation. Un ours polaire ne s’exprime pas ; il faut qu’un scientifique, un artiste, un activiste, un avocat le représente. Or cette délégation est elle-même sujette à controverse : *qui parle au nom de qui ? avec quelle légitimité ? avec quelle autorisation symbolique, épistémique, politique ?* +Dans *Politiques de la nature* (1999), Latour radicalise encore cette +intuition en formulant une théorie politique qui dépasse à la fois la +démocratie représentative classique et l'écologie institutionnelle. Il y +déploie ce qu'il appelle une *constitution cosmopolitique*, un +*Parlement des choses*, dans lequel les entités non-humaines — fleuves, animaux, virus, objets techniques, atmosphères — sont +représentées dans la délibération politique. Mais cette représentation +ne va pas de soi : elle requiert des *porte-paroles*, des formats +d'épreuve, des chaînes de légitimation. Un ours polaire ne s'exprime pas +; il faut qu'un scientifique, un artiste, un activiste, un avocat le +représente. Or cette délégation est elle-même sujette à controverse : +*qui parle au nom de qui ? avec quelle légitimité ? avec quelle +autorisation symbolique, épistémique, politique ?* -97. Ce que Latour met au jour, c’est que la régulation ne peut plus être fondée sur l’autorité d’une instance unique — qu’il s’agisse de l’État, de la science, ou du droit — mais sur une *pluriversité d’épreuves, de formats de légitimation, de régimes d’attestation*. Il y a des preuves scientifiques, des récits autochtones, des vécus affectifs, des argumentations juridiques, des actions artistiques — et aucun de ces formats ne peut être simplement réduit aux autres. D’où la nécessité d’une *cosmopolitique des épreuves*, c’est-à-dire d’*une arène où les régimes de réalité, les formats de co-présence, les modalités de légitimation puissent être articulés sans être hiérarchisés*. Et c’est précisément là que se situe l’apport fondamental de Latour à notre pensée archicratique : la scène de la régulation est toujours hétérogène, disputée, pluralisée, et jamais close. +Ce que Latour met au jour, c'est que la régulation ne peut plus être +fondée sur l'autorité d'une instance unique — qu'il s'agisse de +l'État, de la science, ou du droit — mais sur une *pluriversité +d'épreuves, de formats de légitimation, de régimes d'attestation*. Il y +a des preuves scientifiques, des récits autochtones, des vécus +affectifs, des argumentations juridiques, des actions artistiques — et +aucun de ces formats ne peut être simplement réduit aux autres. D'où la +nécessité d'une *cosmopolitique des épreuves*, c'est-à-dire d'*une arène +où les régimes de réalité, les formats de co-présence, les modalités de +légitimation puissent être articulés sans être hiérarchisés*. Et c'est +précisément là que se situe l'apport fondamental de Latour à notre +pensée archicratique : la scène de la régulation est toujours +hétérogène, disputée, pluralisée, et jamais close. -98. Cette cosmopolitique se poursuit dans *L’Enquête sur les modes d’existence* (2012), qui constitue sans doute l’œuvre la plus ambitieuse et la plus systématique de Latour. Il y propose une cartographie des *régimes d’existence* — religieux, politique, technique, juridique, fictionnel, scientifique, etc. — chacun étant défini non par sa matière, mais bien par ses *modalités d’épreuve*, ses *formats de validation*, ses *institutions d’attestation*. Ce que propose ici Latour, ce n’est pas une ontologie plate ou relativiste, mais une *ontologie réglée* : chaque régime a ses règles propres, ses temporalités, ses seuils d’irréversibilité, ses formats d’interprétation. Et surtout, les régimes ne sont pas juxtaposables sans dommage : leur mise en relation suppose un travail d’ajustement, une diplomatie, une prudence — bref, une forme de régulation. +Cette cosmopolitique se poursuit dans *L'Enquête sur les modes +d'existence* (2012), qui constitue sans doute l'œuvre la plus ambitieuse +et la plus systématique de Latour. Il y propose une cartographie des +*régimes d'existence* — religieux, politique, technique, juridique, +fictionnel, scientifique, etc. — chacun étant défini non par sa +matière, mais bien par ses *modalités d'épreuve*, ses *formats de +validation*, ses *institutions d'attestation*. Ce que propose ici +Latour, ce n'est pas une ontologie plate ou relativiste, mais une +*ontologie réglée* : chaque régime a ses règles propres, ses +temporalités, ses seuils d'irréversibilité, ses formats +d'interprétation. Et surtout, les régimes ne sont pas juxtaposables sans +dommage : leur mise en relation suppose un travail d'ajustement, une +diplomatie, une prudence — bref, une forme de régulation. -99. Or l’Archicratie, dans son ambition maximale, peut se définir précisément comme cette capacité à orchestrer les régimes d’existence sans les réduire, à rendre possible leur co-présence sans les fusionner, à instituer des scènes où les grandeurs — dans le sens de Boltanski et Thévenot — peuvent être confrontées, discutées, critiquées, sans être soumises à une norme unique. Là où les régimes politiques classiques cherchent l’unification normative, l’Archicratie, inspirée par Latour, cherche la *tension productive*, la *dissonance réglée*, la *pluralité orchestrée*. +Or l'Archicratie, dans son ambition maximale, peut se définir +précisément comme cette capacité à orchestrer les régimes d'existence +sans les réduire, à rendre possible leur co-présence sans les fusionner, +à instituer des scènes où les grandeurs — dans le sens de Boltanski et +Thévenot — peuvent être confrontées, discutées, critiquées, sans être +soumises à une norme unique. Là où les régimes politiques classiques +cherchent l'unification normative, l'Archicratie, inspirée par Latour, +cherche la *tension productive*, la *dissonance réglée*, la *pluralité +orchestrée*. -100. C’est ici que s’impose l’intuition archicratique dans toute sa rigueur : *la régulation n’est pas un état, mais un agencement*, *elle n’est pas une norme, mais une scène*, *elle n’est pas une souveraineté, mais une orchestration d’épreuves*. Chez Latour, cette scène est toujours ouverte, réversible, située — et c’est précisément ce qui fait de sa pensée une ressource décisive pour notre essai-thèse. Car le monde qu’il décrit — *fait d’actants composites, d’épreuves dissensuelles, de représentations disputées* — est exactement celui auquel s’adresse notre hypothèse : un monde *post-souverain*, *post-institutionnel*, *post-normatif*, où la question centrale n’est plus *qui commande ?*, mais *comment faire coexister sans détruire ?* +C'est ici que s'impose l'intuition archicratique dans toute sa rigueur : +*la régulation n'est pas un état, mais un agencement*, *elle n'est pas +une norme, mais une scène*, *elle n'est pas une souveraineté, mais une +orchestration d'épreuves*. Chez Latour, cette scène est toujours +ouverte, réversible, située — et c'est précisément ce qui fait de sa +pensée une ressource décisive pour notre essai-thèse. Car le monde qu'il +décrit — *fait d'actants composites, d'épreuves dissensuelles, de +représentations disputées* — est exactement celui auquel s'adresse +notre hypothèse : un monde *post-souverain*, *post-institutionnel*, +*post-normatif*, où la question centrale n'est plus *qui commande ?*, +mais *comment faire coexister sans détruire ?* -101. Dans ce monde, les tensions ne sont plus des anomalies à résoudre, mais des moteurs à activer. Et c’est pourquoi la pensée latourienne est l’un des rares corpus philosophiques contemporains à intégrer pleinement ce que nous appelons les *tensions de deuxième degré* — c’est-à-dire non plus simplement des oppositions idéologiques (droite/gauche, autorité/liberté), mais des conflits ontologiques : *entre ce qui compte comme réel, ce qui vaut comme légitime, ce qui est reconnu comme existant*. À l’heure des controverses sur le climat, sur les identités, sur les sciences, sur la mémoire, sur les vies habitables, la pensée de Latour permet de penser le politique comme un théâtre de l’incommensurable mis en forme — non pas effacé, mais *rendu visible, écoutable, argumentable*. +Dans ce monde, les tensions ne sont plus des anomalies à résoudre, mais +des moteurs à activer. Et c'est pourquoi la pensée latourienne est l'un +des rares corpus philosophiques contemporains à intégrer pleinement ce +que nous appelons les *tensions de deuxième degré* — c'est-à-dire non +plus simplement des oppositions idéologiques (droite/gauche, +autorité/liberté), mais des conflits ontologiques : *entre ce qui compte +comme réel, ce qui vaut comme légitime, ce qui est reconnu comme +existant*. À l'heure des controverses sur le climat, sur les identités, +sur les sciences, sur la mémoire, sur les vies habitables, la pensée de +Latour permet de penser le politique comme un théâtre de +l'incommensurable mis en forme — non pas effacé, mais *rendu visible, +écoutable, argumentable*. -102. Et ce point est crucial pour notre dispositif critique : la régulation distribuée proposée par Latour pense simultanément une conception de la *cratialité* (les puissances d’agir, les affects, les volontés distribuées), une configuration de l’*arcalité* (les ordres composés, les formats d’attestation, les chaînes de médiation), et une modalité d’*archicration* (la production située, réversible, polyphonique d’un monde viable). La tension entre ces trois pôles n’est jamais neutralisée — elle est *cultivée*, *scénarisée*, *orchestrée*. Le degré de co-viabilité que Latour autorise n’est ni utopique ni technocratique : il est *opératoire*, *expérimental*, *fragile*, *ajusté*, mais surtout *scénique* — au sens où chaque format de régulation doit pouvoir être *mis en scène*, *mis en débat*, *mis à l’épreuve*. C’est une philosophie de la *visibilité régulatrice*, dans la lignée d’Arendt, mais *distribuée dans les agencements techniques, affectifs, écologiques, scientifiques du contemporain*. +Et ce point est crucial pour notre dispositif critique : la régulation +distribuée proposée par Latour pense simultanément une conception de la +*cratialité* (les puissances d'agir, les affects, les volontés +distribuées), une configuration de l'*arcalité* (les ordres composés, +les formats d'attestation, les chaînes de médiation), et une modalité +d'*archicration* (la production située, réversible, polyphonique d'un +monde viable). La tension entre ces trois pôles n'est jamais neutralisée — elle est *cultivée*, *scénarisée*, *orchestrée*. Le degré de +co-viabilité que Latour autorise n'est ni utopique ni technocratique : +il est *opératoire*, *expérimental*, *fragile*, *ajusté*, mais surtout +*scénique* — au sens où chaque format de régulation doit pouvoir être +*mis en scène*, *mis en débat*, *mis à l'épreuve*. C'est une philosophie +de la *visibilité régulatrice*, dans la lignée d'Arendt, mais +*distribuée dans les agencements techniques, affectifs, écologiques, +scientifiques du contemporain*. -103. Reste que cette ressource latourienne ne suffit pas à elle seule. Car si elle rend visible l’hétérogénéité des actants, la pluralité des attachements et la nécessité des scènes de composition, elle laisse plus incertaine la question de la stabilisation différenciée des seuils de contestation, de l’inégale capacité des existences à comparaître, et des conditions sous lesquelles une scène peut devenir effectivement opposable et non simplement descriptive de controverses. C’est en ce point précis que l’archicratie doit prendre le relais : non pour corriger Latour de l’extérieur, mais pour durcir la question de la reprise politique des scènes qu’il a si puissamment contribué à rouvrir. +Reste que cette ressource latourienne ne suffit pas à elle seule. Car si +elle rend visible l'hétérogénéité des actants, la pluralité des +attachements et la nécessité des scènes de composition, elle laisse plus +incertaine la question de la stabilisation différenciée des seuils de +contestation, de l'inégale capacité des existences à comparaître, et des +conditions sous lesquelles une scène peut devenir effectivement +opposable et non simplement descriptive de controverses. C'est en ce +point précis que l'archicratie doit prendre le relais : non pour +corriger Latour de l'extérieur, mais pour durcir la question de la +reprise politique des scènes qu'il a si puissamment contribué à rouvrir. -104. Ce que l’archicratie ajoute, à ce stade, c’est une formalisation plus explicite de la régulation comme *mise en tension réglée* : il ne s’agit pas seulement de cartographier les régimes d’existence, mais de concevoir les conditions de leur mise en forme conjointe dans une scène partagée — c’est-à-dire *dans un monde commun*, *mais non homogène*. Le monde commun n’est pas un donné : c’est *un artefact, une performance, une construction toujours en chantier*. Et c’est cette fragilité fondatrice, cette vulnérabilité structurante, cette tension irréductible entre les régimes, que la pensée archicratique, inspirée de Latour, entend prendre pour *principe régulateur majeur du vivre-ensemble*. +Ce que l'archicratie ajoute, à ce stade, c'est une formalisation plus +explicite de la régulation comme *mise en tension réglée* : il ne s'agit +pas seulement de cartographier les régimes d'existence, mais de +concevoir les conditions de leur mise en forme conjointe dans une scène +partagée — c'est-à-dire *dans un monde commun*, *mais non homogène*. +Le monde commun n'est pas un donné : c'est *un artefact, une +performance, une construction toujours en chantier*. Et c'est cette +fragilité fondatrice, cette vulnérabilité structurante, cette tension +irréductible entre les régimes, que la pensée archicratique, inspirée de +Latour, entend prendre pour *principe régulateur majeur du +vivre-ensemble*. -105. Cette cosmopolitique atteint chez Latour une portée plus systématique encore avec l’Enquête sur les modes d’existence, où il propose de penser non des substances ou des domaines clos, mais des régimes d’être définis par leurs modalités d’épreuve, leurs formats de validation et leurs institutions d’attestation. L’enjeu n’est plus de reconduire une ontologie unitaire, mais d’organiser la co-présence de régimes hétérogènes sans les rabattre les uns sur les autres. C’est là un apport décisif pour l’archicratie : la régulation n’y est plus recherche d’un principe supérieur d’unification, mais orchestration de pluralités irréductibles dans une scène partagée d’ajustement, de traduction et de confrontation. +Cette cosmopolitique atteint chez Latour une portée plus systématique +encore avec l'Enquête sur les modes d'existence, où il propose de penser +non des substances ou des domaines clos, mais des régimes d'être définis +par leurs modalités d'épreuve, leurs formats de validation et leurs +institutions d'attestation. L'enjeu n'est plus de reconduire une +ontologie unitaire, mais d'organiser la co-présence de régimes +hétérogènes sans les rabattre les uns sur les autres. C'est là un apport +décisif pour l'archicratie : la régulation n'y est plus recherche d'un +principe supérieur d'unification, mais orchestration de pluralités +irréductibles dans une scène partagée d'ajustement, de traduction et de +confrontation. -Le monde commun cesse alors d’être un donné : il devient une construction fragile, expérimentale, toujours disputée. La régulation ne consiste plus à imposer une norme universelle, mais à rendre praticable la coexistence d’acteurs, d’êtres et de régimes de réalité qui n’entrent pas spontanément en compatibilité. C’est en ce sens que la pensée latourienne rejoint au plus près notre problématique : elle fait de la co-viabilité non un état, mais un travail de composition. +Le monde commun cesse alors d'être un donné : il devient une +construction fragile, expérimentale, toujours disputée. La régulation ne +consiste plus à imposer une norme universelle, mais à rendre praticable +la coexistence d'acteurs, d'êtres et de régimes de réalité qui n'entrent +pas spontanément en compatibilité. C'est en ce sens que la pensée +latourienne rejoint au plus près notre problématique : elle fait de la +co-viabilité non un état, mais un travail de composition. -106. Le porte-parolat concentre ici l’un des enjeux les plus aigus de la pensée latourienne. Dans un monde peuplé d’actants hétérogènes, les entités ne parlent pas d’elles-mêmes : elles doivent être rendues présentes, défendues, traduites, exposées par d’autres. Dès lors, la délégation n’est jamais neutre : elle engage des chaînes de médiation, des formats d’épreuve et des conflits de légitimité quant à la question décisive du “qui parle au nom de quoi”. C’est à ce niveau que la scène archicratique devient pleinement visible : non comme lieu d’un consensus final, mais comme espace où la légitimité doit sans cesse être produite, contestée et rejouée. +Le porte-parolat concentre ici l'un des enjeux les plus aigus de la +pensée latourienne. Dans un monde peuplé d'actants hétérogènes, les +entités ne parlent pas d'elles-mêmes : elles doivent être rendues +présentes, défendues, traduites, exposées par d'autres. Dès lors, la +délégation n'est jamais neutre : elle engage des chaînes de médiation, +des formats d'épreuve et des conflits de légitimité quant à la question +décisive du "qui parle au nom de quoi". C'est à ce niveau que la scène +archicratique devient pleinement visible : non comme lieu d'un consensus +final, mais comme espace où la légitimité doit sans cesse être produite, +contestée et rejouée. -Latour nous donne ainsi une pensée de la régulation sans souveraineté, sans centre et sans origine, mais non sans forme. La scène politique y devient composition réglée de conflits de légitimation, et l’indécidabilité elle-même cesse d’être un défaut pour devenir une condition structurante du monde commun. Ce que l’Archicratie explicite davantage que lui, c’est la nécessité de formaliser cette composition comme tension réglée entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Mais l’impulsion latourienne demeure décisive : elle permet de penser la co-viabilité comme travail d’ajustement entre des existants hétérogènes, et non comme reconduction d’un ordre déjà donné. +Latour nous donne ainsi une pensée de la régulation sans souveraineté, +sans centre et sans origine, mais non sans forme. La scène politique y +devient composition réglée de conflits de légitimation, et +l'indécidabilité elle-même cesse d'être un défaut pour devenir une +condition structurante du monde commun. Ce que l'Archicratie explicite +davantage que lui, c'est la nécessité de formaliser cette composition +comme tension réglée entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Mais +l'impulsion latourienne demeure décisive : elle permet de penser la +co-viabilité comme travail d'ajustement entre des existants hétérogènes, +et non comme reconduction d'un ordre déjà donné. -107. Et c’est en cela que Bruno Latour, sans jamais employer le terme, fut l’un des penseurs les plus pleinement archicratiques de notre temps. +Et c'est en cela que Bruno Latour, sans jamais employer le terme, fut +l'un des penseurs les plus pleinement archicratiques de notre temps. ### 3.4.4 — Cosmopolitique, ralentissement, épreuves situées — *une régulation critiquée* -108. La pensée d’Isabelle Stengers ne s’avance ni comme doctrine, ni comme système, ni comme architecture de régulation prête à l’emploi. Elle procède par ralentissement, par attention aux situations, par résistance aux cadres d’intelligibilité qui prétendent décider trop vite de ce qui compte. En ce sens, sa cosmopolitique ne relève ni d’un supplément moral ni d’une posture critique décorative : elle constitue une matrice de vigilance destinée à rendre perceptibles les existants, les voix et les épreuves que les régimes dominants de rationalisation tendent à disqualifier. +La pensée d'Isabelle Stengers ne s'avance ni comme doctrine, ni comme +système, ni comme architecture de régulation prête à l'emploi. Elle +procède par ralentissement, par attention aux situations, par résistance +aux cadres d'intelligibilité qui prétendent décider trop vite de ce qui +compte. En ce sens, sa cosmopolitique ne relève ni d'un supplément moral +ni d'une posture critique décorative : elle constitue une matrice de +vigilance destinée à rendre perceptibles les existants, les voix et les +épreuves que les régimes dominants de rationalisation tendent à +disqualifier. -Là où d’autres pensent la composition du commun à partir d’un principe, d’un système ou d’un réseau, Stengers part des situations elles-mêmes, de leur fragilité, de leurs résistances, de ce qu’elles exigent pour ne pas être réduites à des cas déjà codés. La régulation y devient alors une pratique d’écoute et de retenue, un art de faire place à ce qui n’entre pas spontanément dans les schémas de décision disponibles. C’est cette pragmatique des écarts, plus que toute doctrine stabilisée, qui rend sa pensée particulièrement féconde pour une lecture archicratique. +Là où d'autres pensent la composition du commun à partir d'un principe, +d'un système ou d'un réseau, Stengers part des situations elles-mêmes, +de leur fragilité, de leurs résistances, de ce qu'elles exigent pour ne +pas être réduites à des cas déjà codés. La régulation y devient alors +une pratique d'écoute et de retenue, un art de faire place à ce qui +n'entre pas spontanément dans les schémas de décision disponibles. C'est +cette pragmatique des écarts, plus que toute doctrine stabilisée, qui +rend sa pensée particulièrement féconde pour une lecture archicratique. -109. Dans cette perspective, la régulation ne relève plus d’un pouvoir de pilotage ni d’un cadre décisionnel surplombant, mais d’un agir pragmatique de co-présence entre entités affectées, humaines ou non, dont aucune ne peut légitimement occuper la position d’une extériorité souveraine. Ce que Stengers nomme ralentissement n’est ni renoncement ni passivité : c’est un geste cratial majeur, une puissance de suspension capable de désamorcer les automatismes de capture, de différer les clôtures prématurées, et d’ouvrir des intervalles où ce qui résiste peut enfin devenir perceptible, recevable et politiquement opérant. +Dans cette perspective, la régulation ne relève plus d'un pouvoir de +pilotage ni d'un cadre décisionnel surplombant, mais d'un agir +pragmatique de co-présence entre entités affectées, humaines ou non, +dont aucune ne peut légitimement occuper la position d'une extériorité +souveraine. Ce que Stengers nomme ralentissement n'est ni renoncement ni +passivité : c'est un geste cratial majeur, une puissance de suspension +capable de désamorcer les automatismes de capture, de différer les +clôtures prématurées, et d'ouvrir des intervalles où ce qui résiste peut +enfin devenir perceptible, recevable et politiquement opérant. -C’est pourquoi sa critique de la capture managériale est décisive. Elle montre comment l’efficacité technocratique réduit la complexité, impose le silence aux voix dissonantes et ferme les possibles au nom de la gestion. À cette fermeture, Stengers oppose non une inefficacité romantique, mais une hospitalité méthodologique : une pratique d’attention vigilante où l’enjeu n’est plus de maîtriser, mais de tenir ensemble sans précipiter la décision. La cratialité y devient post-souveraine, diffuse, non conquérante ; l’arcalité, située et non transcendante ; l’archicration, enfin, résolument pragmatique, expérimentale et lente. +C'est pourquoi sa critique de la capture managériale est décisive. Elle +montre comment l'efficacité technocratique réduit la complexité, impose +le silence aux voix dissonantes et ferme les possibles au nom de la +gestion. À cette fermeture, Stengers oppose non une inefficacité +romantique, mais une hospitalité méthodologique : une pratique +d'attention vigilante où l'enjeu n'est plus de maîtriser, mais de tenir +ensemble sans précipiter la décision. La cratialité y devient +post-souveraine, diffuse, non conquérante ; l'arcalité, située et non +transcendante ; l'archicration, enfin, résolument pragmatique, +expérimentale et lente. -La force de cette pensée est considérable : elle rend possible une co-viabilité qui ne cherche ni harmonie, ni synthèse, ni convergence forcée, mais la composition patiente d’un monde commun avec l’incommensurable. Sa limite est corrélative : elle formalise peu les dispositifs, les seuils institutionnels et les architectures par lesquels une telle régulation pourrait durablement se soutenir à grande échelle. Stengers offre ainsi à l’Archicratie une exigence décisive — ralentir pour rendre justice à ce qui résiste — sans encore en livrer toute l’ingénierie politique. +La force de cette pensée est considérable : elle rend possible une +co-viabilité qui ne cherche ni harmonie, ni synthèse, ni convergence +forcée, mais la composition patiente d'un monde commun avec +l'incommensurable. Sa limite est corrélative : elle formalise peu les +dispositifs, les seuils institutionnels et les architectures par +lesquels une telle régulation pourrait durablement se soutenir à grande +échelle. Stengers offre ainsi à l'Archicratie une exigence décisive — ralentir pour rendre justice à ce qui résiste — sans encore en livrer +toute l'ingénierie politique. -Cette réserve ne diminue pourtant pas la portée stratégique de son apport. Car Stengers déplace décisivement la question de la régulation vers les scènes où l’on décide trop vite de ce qui mérite d’être entendu, pris en compte ou même reconnu comme existant. Son geste devient alors archicratiquement structurant : il oblige à penser non seulement les formes explicites de la délibération, mais aussi les seuils antérieurs de recevabilité, les conditions sous lesquelles une voix, un être, un savoir ou une vulnérabilité peuvent accéder à l’épreuve commune. En ce sens, sa cosmopolitique ne fournit pas un modèle de composition déjà stabilisé ; elle impose une discipline de vigilance sans laquelle toute régulation risque de se retourner en capture. C’est pourquoi son œuvre doit être comprise moins comme une théorie complète de la co-viabilité que comme une exigence critique interne à toute archicration digne de ce nom : ralentir assez pour que le commun ne se constitue pas au prix de ce qu’il exclut silencieusement. +Cette réserve ne diminue pourtant pas la portée stratégique de son +apport. Car Stengers déplace décisivement la question de la régulation +vers les scènes où l'on décide trop vite de ce qui mérite d'être +entendu, pris en compte ou même reconnu comme existant. Son geste +devient alors archicratiquement structurant : il oblige à penser non +seulement les formes explicites de la délibération, mais aussi les +seuils antérieurs de recevabilité, les conditions sous lesquelles une +voix, un être, un savoir ou une vulnérabilité peuvent accéder à +l'épreuve commune. En ce sens, sa cosmopolitique ne fournit pas un +modèle de composition déjà stabilisé ; elle impose une discipline de +vigilance sans laquelle toute régulation risque de se retourner en +capture. C'est pourquoi son œuvre doit être comprise moins comme une +théorie complète de la co-viabilité que comme une exigence critique +interne à toute archicration digne de ce nom : ralentir assez pour que +le commun ne se constitue pas au prix de ce qu'il exclut +silencieusement. ### 3.4.5 — Dialogue, complexité, auto-éco-régulation — *une régulation comme écologie du lien* -110. La pensée d’Edgar Morin introduit dans cette section une inflexion décisive : elle ne cherche ni à fonder l’ordre, ni à en dévoiler les structures cachées, ni à en cartographier les compositions, mais à comprendre comment des hétérogénéités irréductibles peuvent néanmoins être maintenues ensemble sans être simplifiées. La régulation n’y est plus conçue comme application d’un principe ni comme effet d’un dispositif, mais comme organisation instable de tensions au sein de systèmes ouverts. +La pensée d'Edgar Morin introduit dans cette section une inflexion +décisive : elle ne cherche ni à fonder l'ordre, ni à en dévoiler les +structures cachées, ni à en cartographier les compositions, mais à +comprendre comment des hétérogénéités irréductibles peuvent néanmoins +être maintenues ensemble sans être simplifiées. La régulation n'y est +plus conçue comme application d'un principe ni comme effet d'un +dispositif, mais comme organisation instable de tensions au sein de +systèmes ouverts. -Le cœur de l’apport morinien réside dans le refus de toute réduction unilatérale du réel. Là où les approches classiques isolent ou hiérarchisent, Morin insiste sur la nécessité de maintenir ensemble des dimensions antagonistes — ordre et désordre, autonomie et dépendance, identité et altérité — dans une relation qu’il nomme dialogique. La régulation ne consiste donc plus à supprimer le conflit ni à produire une synthèse stable, mais à rendre possible la tenue simultanée de logiques incompatibles sans qu’elles se neutralisent mutuellement. +Le cœur de l'apport morinien réside dans le refus de toute réduction +unilatérale du réel. Là où les approches classiques isolent ou +hiérarchisent, Morin insiste sur la nécessité de maintenir ensemble des +dimensions antagonistes — ordre et désordre, autonomie et dépendance, +identité et altérité — dans une relation qu'il nomme dialogique. La +régulation ne consiste donc plus à supprimer le conflit ni à produire +une synthèse stable, mais à rendre possible la tenue simultanée de +logiques incompatibles sans qu'elles se neutralisent mutuellement. -111. Relue à partir du paradigme archicratique, cette pensée permet de préciser trois déplacements majeurs. L’arcalité n’y est plus un fondement stable, mais une orientation évolutive, constamment reconfigurée par les interactions du système. La cratialité ne se présente plus comme force unitaire ou conquérante, mais comme multiplicité de puissances hétérogènes dont aucune ne peut prétendre à la domination totale sans produire de déséquilibre. L’archicration, enfin, ne se réduit ni à une décision ni à une procédure : elle devient capacité d’organisation des tensions elles-mêmes, c’est-à-dire aptitude à maintenir un système viable sans en supprimer les contradictions constitutives. +Relue à partir du paradigme archicratique, cette pensée permet de +préciser trois déplacements majeurs. L'arcalité n'y est plus un +fondement stable, mais une orientation évolutive, constamment +reconfigurée par les interactions du système. La cratialité ne se +présente plus comme force unitaire ou conquérante, mais comme +multiplicité de puissances hétérogènes dont aucune ne peut prétendre à +la domination totale sans produire de déséquilibre. L'archicration, +enfin, ne se réduit ni à une décision ni à une procédure : elle devient +capacité d'organisation des tensions elles-mêmes, c'est-à-dire aptitude +à maintenir un système viable sans en supprimer les contradictions +constitutives. -112. Une telle lecture permet de comprendre ce que Morin apporte de singulier à une pensée archicratique de la régulation. Là où d’autres approches s’efforcent encore de résoudre les oppositions, il montre qu’un système vivant ou social ne demeure viable qu’à la condition de transformer ses contradictions en ressources d’organisation. La régulation n’y vaut donc ni comme restauration d’un ordre antérieur, ni comme neutralisation des écarts, mais comme travail constant de composition entre des dynamiques qui ne coïncident pas spontanément. En ce sens, la dialogique morinienne ne se réduit pas à une célébration abstraite de la complexité : elle fournit une manière de penser la tenue d’un monde commun lorsque les logiques qui le traversent demeurent irréductiblement hétérogènes. +Une telle lecture permet de comprendre ce que Morin apporte de singulier +à une pensée archicratique de la régulation. Là où d'autres approches +s'efforcent encore de résoudre les oppositions, il montre qu'un système +vivant ou social ne demeure viable qu'à la condition de transformer ses +contradictions en ressources d'organisation. La régulation n'y vaut donc +ni comme restauration d'un ordre antérieur, ni comme neutralisation des +écarts, mais comme travail constant de composition entre des dynamiques +qui ne coïncident pas spontanément. En ce sens, la dialogique morinienne +ne se réduit pas à une célébration abstraite de la complexité : elle +fournit une manière de penser la tenue d'un monde commun lorsque les +logiques qui le traversent demeurent irréductiblement hétérogènes. -La force d’un tel déplacement est considérable. Morin permet de penser la co-viabilité non comme harmonie ni comme simple survie, mais comme entretien dynamique de tensions internes au sein de systèmes ouverts. Il devient ainsi possible de concevoir une régulation capable d’intégrer l’incertitude, la conflictualité et l’instabilité sans les réduire à des anomalies. +La force d'un tel déplacement est considérable. Morin permet de penser +la co-viabilité non comme harmonie ni comme simple survie, mais comme +entretien dynamique de tensions internes au sein de systèmes ouverts. Il +devient ainsi possible de concevoir une régulation capable d'intégrer +l'incertitude, la conflictualité et l'instabilité sans les réduire à des +anomalies. -113. Et c’est précisément ici que la pensée de Morin se distingue par son applicabilité stratégique : là où Stengers suspend pour mieux entendre, Morin *tisse pour mieux composer*. Car il est l’un des rares penseurs à avoir intégré la complexité dans un horizon de transformation politique, institutionnelle, éducative. Son *éthique de reliance* ne se contente pas de décrire le monde dans sa pluralité irréductible : elle s’efforce de produire des outils pour le penser, pour l’habiter, pour le transformer sans le mutiler. Ce qui rend sa contribution archicratique décisive, c’est sa capacité à *connecter les régimes de rationalité sans les soumettre*, à *orchestrer la diversité sans l’absorber*, à *moduler les régulations sans les figer*. +Et c'est précisément ici que la pensée de Morin se distingue par son +applicabilité stratégique : là où Stengers suspend pour mieux entendre, +Morin *tisse pour mieux composer*. Car il est l'un des rares penseurs à +avoir intégré la complexité dans un horizon de transformation politique, +institutionnelle, éducative. Son *éthique de reliance* ne se contente +pas de décrire le monde dans sa pluralité irréductible : elle s'efforce +de produire des outils pour le penser, pour l'habiter, pour le +transformer sans le mutiler. Ce qui rend sa contribution archicratique +décisive, c'est sa capacité à *connecter les régimes de rationalité sans +les soumettre*, à *orchestrer la diversité sans l'absorber*, à *moduler +les régulations sans les figer*. -114. C’est aussi ce qui donne à sa pensée une portée politique spécifique. Morin ne se contente pas de reconnaître l’interdépendance des dimensions biologique, sociale, technique, symbolique ou institutionnelle ; il oblige à penser leurs enchevêtrements comme des problèmes de composition active. La régulation devient alors écologie du lien : non une fusion harmonieuse des différences, mais une capacité à maintenir des rapports entre des niveaux de réalité distincts, à faire circuler des rétroactions entre eux, et à éviter qu’une logique unique n’écrase toutes les autres. Cette perspective est précieuse pour l’Archicratie, car elle permet de concevoir la co-viabilité non comme équilibre figé, mais comme entretien réflexif d’un monde ouvert, exposé aux bifurcations, aux crises et aux réajustements. +C'est aussi ce qui donne à sa pensée une portée politique spécifique. +Morin ne se contente pas de reconnaître l'interdépendance des dimensions +biologique, sociale, technique, symbolique ou institutionnelle ; il +oblige à penser leurs enchevêtrements comme des problèmes de composition +active. La régulation devient alors écologie du lien : non une fusion +harmonieuse des différences, mais une capacité à maintenir des rapports +entre des niveaux de réalité distincts, à faire circuler des +rétroactions entre eux, et à éviter qu'une logique unique n'écrase +toutes les autres. Cette perspective est précieuse pour l'Archicratie, +car elle permet de concevoir la co-viabilité non comme équilibre figé, +mais comme entretien réflexif d'un monde ouvert, exposé aux +bifurcations, aux crises et aux réajustements. -115. C’est précisément à ce point que la pensée morinienne devient stratégiquement précieuse pour l’Archicratie. Elle ne fournit pas un modèle de régulation achevé, mais une grammaire pour penser comment des tensions hétérogènes peuvent être tenues ensemble sans être simplifiées. Là où d’autres cherchent la stabilité par réduction, Morin impose de penser la viabilité comme capacité d’un système à intégrer ses propres déséquilibres, ses bifurcations et ses contradictions. +C'est précisément à ce point que la pensée morinienne devient +stratégiquement précieuse pour l'Archicratie. Elle ne fournit pas un +modèle de régulation achevé, mais une grammaire pour penser comment des +tensions hétérogènes peuvent être tenues ensemble sans être simplifiées. +Là où d'autres cherchent la stabilité par réduction, Morin impose de +penser la viabilité comme capacité d'un système à intégrer ses propres +déséquilibres, ses bifurcations et ses contradictions. -116. Ce que cette traversée a permis d’établir, c’est que la régulation dialogique ne constitue ni un supplément moral appliqué à des dispositifs préexistants, ni une simple correction délibérative des régimes unilatéraux, mais une modalité propre de structuration du vivre-ensemble. Elle déplace la scène même où se jouent la légitimité, la décision et la reconnaissance : la normativité n’y procède plus d’un fondement transcendant, d’une centralité souveraine ou d’un dispositif d’optimisation, mais d’un travail situé d’exposition mutuelle, de justification, d’ajustement et de composition entre entités hétérogènes. +Ce que cette traversée a permis d'établir, c'est que la régulation +dialogique ne constitue ni un supplément moral appliqué à des +dispositifs préexistants, ni une simple correction délibérative des +régimes unilatéraux, mais une modalité propre de structuration du +vivre-ensemble. Elle déplace la scène même où se jouent la légitimité, +la décision et la reconnaissance : la normativité n'y procède plus d'un +fondement transcendant, d'une centralité souveraine ou d'un dispositif +d'optimisation, mais d'un travail situé d'exposition mutuelle, de +justification, d'ajustement et de composition entre entités hétérogènes. -De Montesquieu à Morin, les pensées ici mobilisées ont montré, chacune à leur manière, qu’il est possible de soustraire la régulation à la capture par une source unique de légitimité sans la dissoudre pour autant dans l’informalité. Elles dessinent un espace où la puissance devient distribuée, où l’arcalité cesse d’être transcendante pour devenir située, révisable, pluralisée, et où l’archicration prend la forme d’une scène d’épreuve construite dans la confrontation visible des justifications, des existants et des régimes de valeur. En ce sens, elles constituent de véritables laboratoires conceptuels pour penser une co-viabilité fondée non sur la fusion des perspectives, mais sur leur mise en tension réglée. +De Montesquieu à Morin, les pensées ici mobilisées ont montré, chacune à +leur manière, qu'il est possible de soustraire la régulation à la +capture par une source unique de légitimité sans la dissoudre pour +autant dans l'informalité. Elles dessinent un espace où la puissance +devient distribuée, où l'arcalité cesse d'être transcendante pour +devenir située, révisable, pluralisée, et où l'archicration prend la +forme d'une scène d'épreuve construite dans la confrontation visible des +justifications, des existants et des régimes de valeur. En ce sens, +elles constituent de véritables laboratoires conceptuels pour penser une +co-viabilité fondée non sur la fusion des perspectives, mais sur leur +mise en tension réglée. -Mais cette fécondité rencontre une limite décisive. Si ces pensées décentrent avec force les monopoles de la normativité, elles laissent souvent en suspens les conditions d’institutionnalisation concrète de cette distribution : les formats durables d’épreuve, les médiations stabilisées, les scènes effectives dans lesquelles une pluralité de voix, de forces et de légitimités pourrait non seulement s’exposer, mais se transformer sans être recapturée. L’archicration ne peut donc se satisfaire d’un ethos dialogique ni d’un simple appel à la pluralité ; elle requiert une véritable architecture politique du dissensus habitable, capable de configurer des lieux, des temporalités et des procédures où les divergences deviennent opératoires sans être neutralisées. +Mais cette fécondité rencontre une limite décisive. Si ces pensées +décentrent avec force les monopoles de la normativité, elles laissent +souvent en suspens les conditions d'institutionnalisation concrète de +cette distribution : les formats durables d'épreuve, les médiations +stabilisées, les scènes effectives dans lesquelles une pluralité de +voix, de forces et de légitimités pourrait non seulement s'exposer, mais +se transformer sans être recapturée. L'archicration ne peut donc se +satisfaire d'un ethos dialogique ni d'un simple appel à la pluralité ; +elle requiert une véritable architecture politique du dissensus +habitable, capable de configurer des lieux, des temporalités et des +procédures où les divergences deviennent opératoires sans être +neutralisées. -C’est pourquoi cette séquence ne clôt pas l’investigation archicratique : elle en prépare un approfondissement déterminant. Car dès lors que la régulation dialogique suppose déjà des formats d’exposition, des règles de recevabilité et des scènes de confrontation, un nouveau plan d’analyse s’impose : celui des régimes procéduraux et délibératifs proprement dits, où la parole ne se contente plus d’être échangée, mais doit être mise en forme, en scène et en procédure. La section suivante interrogera donc ces régimes d’ouverture scénique, afin de comprendre comment la délibération publique tente d’instituer la co-viabilité — et pourquoi, là encore, toute scène ne vaut pas épreuve, toute procédure ne vaut pas opposabilité, et toute délibération ne vaut pas régulation viable. +C'est pourquoi cette séquence ne clôt pas l'investigation archicratique +: elle en prépare un approfondissement déterminant. Car dès lors que la +régulation dialogique suppose déjà des formats d'exposition, des règles +de recevabilité et des scènes de confrontation, un nouveau plan +d'analyse s'impose : celui des régimes procéduraux et délibératifs +proprement dits, où la parole ne se contente plus d'être échangée, mais +doit être mise en forme, en scène et en procédure. La section suivante +interrogera donc ces régimes d'ouverture scénique, afin de comprendre +comment la délibération publique tente d'instituer la co-viabilité — et pourquoi, là encore, toute scène ne vaut pas épreuve, toute procédure +ne vaut pas opposabilité, et toute délibération ne vaut pas régulation +viable. ## **3.5 — Régimes délibératifs et ouvertures scéniques — *puissance procédurale*** -L’idée que la délibération constitue l’un des piliers de la vie démocratique s’est imposée comme l’un des grands horizons normatifs de la modernité politique. Mais cet idéal demeure profondément équivoque. Car il ne suffit pas que la parole circule pour qu’il y ait régulation, pas plus qu’il ne suffit qu’une procédure organise l’échange pour qu’une scène politique advienne. Entre discussion, délibération et régulation, l’écart reste important. +L'idée que la délibération constitue l'un des piliers de la vie +démocratique s'est imposée comme l'un des grands horizons normatifs de +la modernité politique. Mais cet idéal demeure profondément équivoque. +Car il ne suffit pas que la parole circule pour qu'il y ait régulation, +pas plus qu'il ne suffit qu'une procédure organise l'échange pour qu'une +scène politique advienne. Entre discussion, délibération et régulation, +l'écart reste important. -C’est cet écart que la présente section entend interroger. Dans une perspective archicratique, une scène délibérative ne devient politiquement régulatrice qu’à certaines conditions : qu’elle repose sur une arcalité explicite et partageable, qu’elle engage une cratialité réelle capable de produire des effets sur l’ordre commun, et qu’elle donne lieu à une archicration, c’est-à-dire à une mise en tension visible, habitable et transformatrice de ces deux dimensions. Or les régimes délibératifs modernes et contemporains échouent souvent à réunir ces conditions : tantôt ils neutralisent la conflictualité au nom de la forme, tantôt ils célèbrent l’ouverture sans lui donner de prise effective, tantôt ils multiplient les scènes sans les articuler à une véritable architecture de transformation. +C'est cet écart que la présente section entend interroger. Dans une +perspective archicratique, une scène délibérative ne devient +politiquement régulatrice qu'à certaines conditions : qu'elle repose sur +une arcalité explicite et partageable, qu'elle engage une cratialité +réelle capable de produire des effets sur l'ordre commun, et qu'elle +donne lieu à une archicration, c'est-à-dire à une mise en tension +visible, habitable et transformatrice de ces deux dimensions. Or les +régimes délibératifs modernes et contemporains échouent souvent à réunir +ces conditions : tantôt ils neutralisent la conflictualité au nom de la +forme, tantôt ils célèbrent l'ouverture sans lui donner de prise +effective, tantôt ils multiplient les scènes sans les articuler à une +véritable architecture de transformation. -Nous en proposerons donc une cartographie critique en quatre temps : d’abord la régulation bureaucratique et légale-formelle, où la procédure tend à remplacer l’épreuve ; ensuite la pensée du lieu vide du pouvoir, où l’ouverture démocratique risque de se dissoudre dans la désincarnation ; puis les régimes du dissensus, où la conflictualité redevient visible sans toujours devenir instituante ; enfin les dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains, qui tentent d’ouvrir des scènes nouvelles sans toujours parvenir à leur donner consistance. L’enjeu n’est pas de produire une théorie générale de la délibération, mais d’éprouver chaque régime à l’aune d’une exigence simple et décisive : non pas faire parler, mais faire en sorte que la parole devienne régulatrice. +Nous en proposerons donc une cartographie critique en quatre temps : +d'abord la régulation bureaucratique et légale-formelle, où la procédure +tend à remplacer l'épreuve ; ensuite la pensée du lieu vide du pouvoir, +où l'ouverture démocratique risque de se dissoudre dans la +désincarnation ; puis les régimes du dissensus, où la conflictualité +redevient visible sans toujours devenir instituante ; enfin les +dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains, qui tentent d'ouvrir des scènes +nouvelles sans toujours parvenir à leur donner consistance. L'enjeu +n'est pas de produire une théorie générale de la délibération, mais +d'éprouver chaque régime à l'aune d'une exigence simple et décisive : +non pas faire parler, mais faire en sorte que la parole devienne +régulatrice. ### 3.5.1 — Bureaucratie et légalité formelle : *une régulation voulue impartiale* -La modernité politique a fait émerger une forme spécifique de régulation que l’on peut qualifier, dans le vocabulaire archicratique, de régime de formalisation impersonnelle. Sa promesse est connue : garantir l’équité du traitement, la prévisibilité des décisions et la neutralité de l’arène publique par l’application de règles générales, abstraites et stables. Weber en a donné la formulation canonique avec l’idéal-type de la bureaucratie légale-rationnelle. Kelsen en a radicalisé la logique dans la théorie d’un ordre juridique auto-référentiel, fondé sur la seule validité formelle des normes. Hart, enfin, en a proposé une version plus souple, mais toujours centrée sur la régularité procédurale comme condition de fonctionnement du droit. +La modernité politique a fait émerger une forme spécifique de régulation +que l'on peut qualifier, dans le vocabulaire archicratique, de régime de +formalisation impersonnelle. Sa promesse est connue : garantir l'équité +du traitement, la prévisibilité des décisions et la neutralité de +l'arène publique par l'application de règles générales, abstraites et +stables. Weber en a donné la formulation canonique avec l'idéal-type de +la bureaucratie légale-rationnelle. Kelsen en a radicalisé la logique +dans la théorie d'un ordre juridique auto-référentiel, fondé sur la +seule validité formelle des normes. Hart, enfin, en a proposé une +version plus souple, mais toujours centrée sur la régularité procédurale +comme condition de fonctionnement du droit. -Ce modèle a représenté un progrès historique réel contre l’arbitraire, les privilèges et les régimes personnalisés de domination. Mais il comporte une limite politique décisive : à mesure que la légitimité est rabattue sur la conformité procédurale, la régulation cesse d’être une scène d’épreuve pour devenir un système de traitement normatif. La légalité ne procède plus du conflit exposé, mais de la validité formelle ; le pouvoir ne disparaît pas, il s’incarne dans la procédure elle-même. C’est pourquoi la bureaucratie moderne, comme l’avait vu Bourdieu, ne neutralise pas le pouvoir : elle le déplace dans une forme impersonnelle qui tend à rendre sa violence moins visible et plus difficilement contestable. +Ce modèle a représenté un progrès historique réel contre l'arbitraire, +les privilèges et les régimes personnalisés de domination. Mais il +comporte une limite politique décisive : à mesure que la légitimité est +rabattue sur la conformité procédurale, la régulation cesse d'être une +scène d'épreuve pour devenir un système de traitement normatif. La +légalité ne procède plus du conflit exposé, mais de la validité formelle +; le pouvoir ne disparaît pas, il s'incarne dans la procédure elle-même. +C'est pourquoi la bureaucratie moderne, comme l'avait vu Bourdieu, ne +neutralise pas le pouvoir : elle le déplace dans une forme impersonnelle +qui tend à rendre sa violence moins visible et plus difficilement +contestable. -Les institutions bureaucratiques offrent bien des scènes — guichets, tribunaux, commissions, conseils — mais ces scènes sont le plus souvent pré-cadrées par des formats d’accès, de langage et de recevabilité qui conditionnent en amont ce qui peut apparaître. Ce qui est autorisé à se dire n’est plus une conflictualité vivante, mais une demande déjà traduite dans le langage de la procédure. Comme l’indique Jacques Lagroye, dans les arènes bureaucratiques, ce qui se discute est d’abord la conformité de la demande aux formes reconnues, non la légitimité de son contenu. +Les institutions bureaucratiques offrent bien des scènes — guichets, +tribunaux, commissions, conseils — mais ces scènes sont le plus +souvent pré-cadrées par des formats d'accès, de langage et de +recevabilité qui conditionnent en amont ce qui peut apparaître. Ce qui +est autorisé à se dire n'est plus une conflictualité vivante, mais une +demande déjà traduite dans le langage de la procédure. Comme l'indique +Jacques Lagroye, dans les arènes bureaucratiques, ce qui se discute est +d'abord la conformité de la demande aux formes reconnues, non la +légitimité de son contenu. -Les exemples administratifs le montrent clairement : dans les commissions d’attribution, les juridictions administratives ou les dispositifs d’évaluation standardisée, les situations singulières ne deviennent audibles qu’à condition d’entrer dans des catégories préétablies. Si le sujet conteste le critère lui-même, le barème, le format, ou les termes de sa propre évaluation, sa parole tend à sortir du champ du recevable. Le dissensus n’est pas interdit ; il est reformulé en incompétence procédurale, hors-sujet ou défaut de forme. L’accès à la scène n’est donc jamais neutre : il suppose une maîtrise préalable des langages légitimes, socialement inégalement distribuée, comme l’ont montré Bourdieu et Crozier. +Les exemples administratifs le montrent clairement : dans les +commissions d'attribution, les juridictions administratives ou les +dispositifs d'évaluation standardisée, les situations singulières ne +deviennent audibles qu'à condition d'entrer dans des catégories +préétablies. Si le sujet conteste le critère lui-même, le barème, le +format, ou les termes de sa propre évaluation, sa parole tend à sortir +du champ du recevable. Le dissensus n'est pas interdit ; il est +reformulé en incompétence procédurale, hors-sujet ou défaut de forme. +L'accès à la scène n'est donc jamais neutre : il suppose une maîtrise +préalable des langages légitimes, socialement inégalement distribuée, +comme l'ont montré Bourdieu et Crozier. -C’est ici que se révèle la fermeture propre au régime procédural. Le problème n’est pas la forme en soi, mais son durcissement en norme close, insensible à sa propre historicité et résistante à toute critique de ses conditions de validité. Dès lors, la procédure ne sert plus d’instrument d’accès à l’épreuve politique ; elle devient le filtre silencieux de ce qui peut être contesté. La scène subsiste, mais comme scène saturée : elle simule l’épreuve tout en verrouillant les conditions d’une transformation réelle du cadre. +C'est ici que se révèle la fermeture propre au régime procédural. Le +problème n'est pas la forme en soi, mais son durcissement en norme +close, insensible à sa propre historicité et résistante à toute critique +de ses conditions de validité. Dès lors, la procédure ne sert plus +d'instrument d'accès à l'épreuve politique ; elle devient le filtre +silencieux de ce qui peut être contesté. La scène subsiste, mais comme +scène saturée : elle simule l'épreuve tout en verrouillant les +conditions d'une transformation réelle du cadre. -Le cœur du problème apparaît alors avec netteté : lorsque la procédure prétend constituer à elle seule la scène de la régulation, elle tend à convertir le conflit en simple objet de traitement. Garapon l’a montré pour le rituel judiciaire ; Foucault l’avait déjà analysé plus largement dans la gouvernementalité moderne : le pouvoir ne s’exerce pas d’abord en interdisant, mais en configurant les conditions d’apparition des sujets, des plaintes et des prises de parole. La forme procédurale participe pleinement de cette logique. Elle rend certaines demandes visibles, mais à la condition de les reformater ; elle autorise l’expression, mais dans un langage déjà codé ; elle produit une scène, mais une scène où la norme elle-même demeure rarement exposée à l’épreuve. +Le cœur du problème apparaît alors avec netteté : lorsque la procédure +prétend constituer à elle seule la scène de la régulation, elle tend à +convertir le conflit en simple objet de traitement. Garapon l'a montré +pour le rituel judiciaire ; Foucault l'avait déjà analysé plus largement +dans la gouvernementalité moderne : le pouvoir ne s'exerce pas d'abord +en interdisant, mais en configurant les conditions d'apparition des +sujets, des plaintes et des prises de parole. La forme procédurale +participe pleinement de cette logique. Elle rend certaines demandes +visibles, mais à la condition de les reformater ; elle autorise +l'expression, mais dans un langage déjà codé ; elle produit une scène, +mais une scène où la norme elle-même demeure rarement exposée à +l'épreuve. -Du point de vue archicratique, cette clôture est décisive. Car l’exigence n’est pas seulement que les sujets soient traités selon des règles, mais que les règles elles-mêmes puissent être interrogées, contestées, reformulées dans un espace visible et traversable. Une procédure peut donc devenir une scène d’archicration, mais à une condition stricte : qu’elle cesse d’être le simple canal d’un traitement pour devenir un dispositif d’apparition du conflit, de visibilité des asymétries et de requalification des normes. Faute de quoi, elle demeure une normativité sans scène, c’est-à-dire une forme qui organise la régulation tout en soustrayant sa propre légitimité à l’épreuve. +Du point de vue archicratique, cette clôture est décisive. Car +l'exigence n'est pas seulement que les sujets soient traités selon des +règles, mais que les règles elles-mêmes puissent être interrogées, +contestées, reformulées dans un espace visible et traversable. Une +procédure peut donc devenir une scène d'archicration, mais à une +condition stricte : qu'elle cesse d'être le simple canal d'un traitement +pour devenir un dispositif d'apparition du conflit, de visibilité des +asymétries et de requalification des normes. Faute de quoi, elle demeure +une normativité sans scène, c'est-à-dire une forme qui organise la +régulation tout en soustrayant sa propre légitimité à l'épreuve. -C’est ce point de tension qui nous conduit au seuil suivant. Car lorsque le pouvoir ne se ferme plus dans la forme procédurale, mais se dérobe comme lieu, une autre question surgit : que devient la régulation lorsqu’il n’y a plus d’instance pleinement visible à contester, plus de figure à interpeller, mais un vide symbolique au cœur même du pouvoir démocratique ? C’est ce problème que nous allons maintenant aborder avec la pensée du lieu vide. +C'est ce point de tension qui nous conduit au seuil suivant. Car lorsque +le pouvoir ne se ferme plus dans la forme procédurale, mais se dérobe +comme lieu, une autre question surgit : que devient la régulation +lorsqu'il n'y a plus d'instance pleinement visible à contester, plus de +figure à interpeller, mais un vide symbolique au cœur même du pouvoir +démocratique ? C'est ce problème que nous allons maintenant aborder avec +la pensée du lieu vide. ### 3.5.2 — Le lieu vide et la visibilité du pouvoir : *régulation sans incarnation* -À la suite de notre critique des régimes procéduraux, un autre type de vide doit maintenant être interrogé : non plus la fermeture de la scène par excès de forme, mais la vacance symbolique au cœur même du pouvoir démocratique. Avec Claude Lefort, la démocratie cesse d’être pensée comme incarnation d’une unité substantielle ; elle devient le régime dans lequel le pouvoir ne peut jamais être durablement approprié, parce qu’il se tient dans un lieu symboliquement vide, constamment rouvert par les luttes d’interprétation, les conflits d’orientation et la division du social. +À la suite de notre critique des régimes procéduraux, un autre type de +vide doit maintenant être interrogé : non plus la fermeture de la scène +par excès de forme, mais la vacance symbolique au cœur même du pouvoir +démocratique. Avec Claude Lefort, la démocratie cesse d'être pensée +comme incarnation d'une unité substantielle ; elle devient le régime +dans lequel le pouvoir ne peut jamais être durablement approprié, parce +qu'il se tient dans un lieu symboliquement vide, constamment rouvert par +les luttes d'interprétation, les conflits d'orientation et la division +du social. -Cette thèse a représenté un déplacement majeur. Elle a permis de penser le politique non plus à partir d’un fondement stable, d’une souveraineté incarnée ou d’une vérité unificatrice, mais à partir d’une indétermination constitutive. Le vide du pouvoir n’y signale pas une faiblesse de la démocratie, mais sa condition même : ce qui empêche sa captation par une personne, un groupe ou un dogme. À ce titre, le modèle lefortien a fourni l’une des critiques les plus puissantes du totalitarisme, défini précisément par la saturation de ce vide et par la prétention à remplir pleinement le lieu du pouvoir. +Cette thèse a représenté un déplacement majeur. Elle a permis de penser +le politique non plus à partir d'un fondement stable, d'une souveraineté +incarnée ou d'une vérité unificatrice, mais à partir d'une +indétermination constitutive. Le vide du pouvoir n'y signale pas une +faiblesse de la démocratie, mais sa condition même : ce qui empêche sa +captation par une personne, un groupe ou un dogme. À ce titre, le modèle +lefortien a fourni l'une des critiques les plus puissantes du +totalitarisme, défini précisément par la saturation de ce vide et par la +prétention à remplir pleinement le lieu du pouvoir. -La portée de cette thèse est considérable. En rompant avec toute représentation substantialiste du pouvoir, Lefort a permis de penser la démocratie non comme ordre achevé, mais comme régime d’exposition permanente à la division. Le pouvoir n’y vaut plus comme propriété, mais comme lieu contestable, toujours susceptible d’être réinterprété, déplacé, remis en jeu. C’est en cela que son modèle demeure structurant pour notre parcours : il fait apparaître que la conflictualité n’est pas un accident du politique démocratique, mais sa condition symbolique la plus profonde. +La portée de cette thèse est considérable. En rompant avec toute +représentation substantialiste du pouvoir, Lefort a permis de penser la +démocratie non comme ordre achevé, mais comme régime d'exposition +permanente à la division. Le pouvoir n'y vaut plus comme propriété, mais +comme lieu contestable, toujours susceptible d'être réinterprété, +déplacé, remis en jeu. C'est en cela que son modèle demeure structurant +pour notre parcours : il fait apparaître que la conflictualité n'est pas +un accident du politique démocratique, mais sa condition symbolique la +plus profonde. -Mais la force critique du modèle lefortien rencontre une limite décisive du point de vue archicratique : un vide symbolique ne vaut pas encore comme scène d’épreuve. Qu’il empêche l’appropriation totale du pouvoir ne suffit pas ; encore faut-il qu’il rende possible des formes visibles, situées et traversables de confrontation. Sans cela, la vacance risque de se transformer en abstraction politique : le pouvoir n’est plus incarné, certes, mais il n’est pas davantage exposé. Il se dérobe, se dissémine, devient insituable — et, par là même, plus difficilement contestable. +Mais la force critique du modèle lefortien rencontre une limite décisive +du point de vue archicratique : un vide symbolique ne vaut pas encore +comme scène d'épreuve. Qu'il empêche l'appropriation totale du pouvoir +ne suffit pas ; encore faut-il qu'il rende possible des formes visibles, +situées et traversables de confrontation. Sans cela, la vacance risque +de se transformer en abstraction politique : le pouvoir n'est plus +incarné, certes, mais il n'est pas davantage exposé. Il se dérobe, se +dissémine, devient insituable — et, par là même, plus difficilement +contestable. -C’est ici que la perspective archicratique introduit sa correction décisive. Le vide n’est politiquement fécond qu’à condition d’être habité par des formes de passage : des scènes, des rythmes, des dispositifs, des prises d’adresse, des procédures de conflictualisation qui rendent la vacance perceptible, partageable et disputable. Faute de cette inscription scénique, l’ouverture démocratique peut être recapturée par des puissances technocratiques, gestionnaires ou infrastructurelles, qui opèrent sans apparaître. La vacance cesse alors d’être la condition du dissensus pour devenir l’écran de sa neutralisation. Ce n’est donc pas le vide en soi qui fait problème, mais son absence de traduction dans des formes concrètes de visibilité, de localisation et d’institution du conflit. +C'est ici que la perspective archicratique introduit sa correction +décisive. Le vide n'est politiquement fécond qu'à condition d'être +habité par des formes de passage : des scènes, des rythmes, des +dispositifs, des prises d'adresse, des procédures de conflictualisation +qui rendent la vacance perceptible, partageable et disputable. Faute de +cette inscription scénique, l'ouverture démocratique peut être +recapturée par des puissances technocratiques, gestionnaires ou +infrastructurelles, qui opèrent sans apparaître. La vacance cesse alors +d'être la condition du dissensus pour devenir l'écran de sa +neutralisation. Ce n'est donc pas le vide en soi qui fait problème, mais +son absence de traduction dans des formes concrètes de visibilité, de +localisation et d'institution du conflit. -On mesure ici le risque propre aux démocraties libérales avancées : un pouvoir qui n’est plus approprié ne devient pas nécessairement plus disputable. Il peut au contraire se déplacer vers des chaînes de décision technocratiques, des infrastructures juridiques, des appareils de gestion ou des architectures informationnelles qui demeurent largement sans visage. Le vide du pouvoir, lorsqu’il n’est pas relayé par des scènes effectives d’apparition et de contestation, peut ainsi produire moins une ouverture démocratique qu’une désorientation politique, où les sujets perçoivent l’autorité comme diffuse, lointaine, insituable — donc difficilement attaquable. +On mesure ici le risque propre aux démocraties libérales avancées : un +pouvoir qui n'est plus approprié ne devient pas nécessairement plus +disputable. Il peut au contraire se déplacer vers des chaînes de +décision technocratiques, des infrastructures juridiques, des appareils +de gestion ou des architectures informationnelles qui demeurent +largement sans visage. Le vide du pouvoir, lorsqu'il n'est pas relayé +par des scènes effectives d'apparition et de contestation, peut ainsi +produire moins une ouverture démocratique qu'une désorientation +politique, où les sujets perçoivent l'autorité comme diffuse, lointaine, +insituable — donc difficilement attaquable. -Il faut donc reconnaître au concept de lieu vide une portée critique majeure, tout en en mesurant la limite. Il demeure essentiel pour délégitimer les appropriations totalisantes du pouvoir et pour penser la démocratie comme régime de division assumée. Mais, livré à lui-même, il tend à reconduire une vacance trop abstraite, trop symbolique, trop peu traduite dans des formes effectives de confrontation. Un vide qui n’est ni localisé, ni figuré, ni institué risque moins d’ouvrir l’épreuve que de la dérober. +Il faut donc reconnaître au concept de lieu vide une portée critique +majeure, tout en en mesurant la limite. Il demeure essentiel pour +délégitimer les appropriations totalisantes du pouvoir et pour penser la +démocratie comme régime de division assumée. Mais, livré à lui-même, il +tend à reconduire une vacance trop abstraite, trop symbolique, trop peu +traduite dans des formes effectives de confrontation. Un vide qui n'est +ni localisé, ni figuré, ni institué risque moins d'ouvrir l'épreuve que +de la dérober. -La tâche archicratique consiste alors non à combler le vide, mais à le rendre praticable : à instituer des formes d’apparition, des lieux d’adresse, des temporalités de dispute et des contre-pouvoirs visibles capables de transformer l’indétermination démocratique en scène effective d’épreuve. C’est à cette condition seulement que la vacance du pouvoir cesse d’être une simple abstraction pour devenir une structure disputable du commun. Ce déplacement nous conduit directement vers les pensées du dissensus, qui chercheront moins à préserver le vide qu’à faire surgir la scène même où le conflit peut apparaître, s’exposer et devenir instituant. +La tâche archicratique consiste alors non à combler le vide, mais à le +rendre praticable : à instituer des formes d'apparition, des lieux +d'adresse, des temporalités de dispute et des contre-pouvoirs visibles +capables de transformer l'indétermination démocratique en scène +effective d'épreuve. C'est à cette condition seulement que la vacance du +pouvoir cesse d'être une simple abstraction pour devenir une structure +disputable du commun. Ce déplacement nous conduit directement vers les +pensées du dissensus, qui chercheront moins à préserver le vide qu'à +faire surgir la scène même où le conflit peut apparaître, s'exposer et +devenir instituant. ### 3.5.3 — Dissensus et égalité présupposée : *une régulation par la polémique* -Après la vacance symbolique du pouvoir, il faut désormais interroger une autre figure de la régulation politique : celle qui surgit dans le dissensus lui-même, lorsque le conflit cesse d’être perçu comme un accident de la vie collective pour devenir la condition même d’une scène politique effective. Avec Rancière, Mouffe et Tassin, la politique ne se laisse plus penser à partir de la stabilité des institutions ni de la simple ouverture démocratique, mais à partir de formes de confrontation visibles, situées, où s’éprouvent les cadres mêmes du commun. +Après la vacance symbolique du pouvoir, il faut désormais interroger une +autre figure de la régulation politique : celle qui surgit dans le +dissensus lui-même, lorsque le conflit cesse d'être perçu comme un +accident de la vie collective pour devenir la condition même d'une scène +politique effective. Avec Rancière, Mouffe et Tassin, la politique ne se +laisse plus penser à partir de la stabilité des institutions ni de la +simple ouverture démocratique, mais à partir de formes de confrontation +visibles, situées, où s'éprouvent les cadres mêmes du commun. -La thèse directrice de cette sous-section est simple : le dissensus peut devenir une modalité de régulation, mais seulement lorsqu’il accède à une scène où il devient visible, opposable et potentiellement transformateur. Rancière en donne la formulation la plus radicale, en identifiant la politique à l’irruption d’un sujet inattendu qui met en crise le partage du sensible. Le dissensus n’y est pas une divergence à arbitrer, mais un tort qui exige la reconfiguration même de l’ordre du visible et de l’audible. +La thèse directrice de cette sous-section est simple : le dissensus peut +devenir une modalité de régulation, mais seulement lorsqu'il accède à +une scène où il devient visible, opposable et potentiellement +transformateur. Rancière en donne la formulation la plus radicale, en +identifiant la politique à l'irruption d'un sujet inattendu qui met en +crise le partage du sensible. Le dissensus n'y est pas une divergence à +arbitrer, mais un tort qui exige la reconfiguration même de l'ordre du +visible et de l'audible. -Le partage du sensible, chez Rancière, désigne l’organisation des perceptibles et des dicibles dans un espace social donné : qui est visible, qui est écouté, qui peut parler, qui peut être pris en compte. Ce partage n’est jamais neutre ; il est toujours structuré par des rapports de domination. Et c’est précisément ce que le dissensus vient bouleverser. +Le partage du sensible, chez Rancière, désigne l'organisation des +perceptibles et des dicibles dans un espace social donné : qui est +visible, qui est écouté, qui peut parler, qui peut être pris en compte. +Ce partage n'est jamais neutre ; il est toujours structuré par des +rapports de domination. Et c'est précisément ce que le dissensus vient +bouleverser. -Dans *La Mésentente*, Rancière distingue entre la police et la politique. La police n’est pas ici l’institution répressive, mais l’ordre qui distribue les places, les fonctions, les rôles, qui organise la société selon un schéma de visibilité reconnu. La politique, elle, surgit quand cet ordre est mis en question, non pas par des revendications compatibles avec l’ordre, mais par une subjectivation qui le conteste en son principe même. +Dans *La Mésentente*, Rancière distingue entre la police et la +politique. La police n'est pas ici l'institution répressive, mais +l'ordre qui distribue les places, les fonctions, les rôles, qui organise +la société selon un schéma de visibilité reconnu. La politique, elle, +surgit quand cet ordre est mis en question, non pas par des +revendications compatibles avec l'ordre, mais par une subjectivation qui +le conteste en son principe même. -Ce que cette conception permet de penser, c’est que la régulation politique ne passe pas nécessairement par la médiation du droit ou de la procédure, mais peut aussi s’exercer par l’apparition imprévisible d’un acteur qui interrompt le cours ordinaire des choses, qui désorganise l’espace symbolique, qui fait entendre une parole que l’ordre dominant ne savait pas écouter. +Ce que cette conception permet de penser, c'est que la régulation +politique ne passe pas nécessairement par la médiation du droit ou de la +procédure, mais peut aussi s'exercer par l'apparition imprévisible d'un +acteur qui interrompt le cours ordinaire des choses, qui désorganise +l'espace symbolique, qui fait entendre une parole que l'ordre dominant +ne savait pas écouter. -La radicalité de Rancière tient précisément à ce point : il n’y a de politique que là où une parole inassignable interrompt l’ordre du visible et oblige à reconfigurer ce qui compte comme commun. Mais cette radicalité fait aussi surgir une limite du point de vue archicratique. Car si le dissensus est pensé avant tout comme surgissement, comment devient-il durablement régulateur ? Comment passe-t-on de l’irruption à la reprise, de la rupture à une transformation instituable du cadre ? C’est cette difficulté qui conduit à examiner des pensées cherchant à donner au conflit des formes plus durables, au premier rang desquelles celle de Chantal Mouffe. +La radicalité de Rancière tient précisément à ce point : il n'y a de +politique que là où une parole inassignable interrompt l'ordre du +visible et oblige à reconfigurer ce qui compte comme commun. Mais cette +radicalité fait aussi surgir une limite du point de vue archicratique. +Car si le dissensus est pensé avant tout comme surgissement, comment +devient-il durablement régulateur ? Comment passe-t-on de l'irruption à +la reprise, de la rupture à une transformation instituable du cadre ? +C'est cette difficulté qui conduit à examiner des pensées cherchant à +donner au conflit des formes plus durables, au premier rang desquelles +celle de Chantal Mouffe. -Avec Chantal Mouffe, la conflictualité ne vaut plus seulement comme irruption, mais comme permanence structurante du politique démocratique. Contre les modèles délibératifs du consensus rationnel, elle affirme que les sociétés modernes demeurent traversées par des antagonismes irréductibles, que la démocratie ne doit ni nier ni dissoudre, mais transformer en conflits agonistiques. L’adversaire n’y est pas un ennemi à éliminer, mais un opposant à combattre dans un cadre partagé, sans que le désaccord perde son intensité. +Avec Chantal Mouffe, la conflictualité ne vaut plus seulement comme +irruption, mais comme permanence structurante du politique démocratique. +Contre les modèles délibératifs du consensus rationnel, elle affirme que +les sociétés modernes demeurent traversées par des antagonismes +irréductibles, que la démocratie ne doit ni nier ni dissoudre, mais +transformer en conflits agonistiques. L'adversaire n'y est pas un ennemi +à éliminer, mais un opposant à combattre dans un cadre partagé, sans que +le désaccord perde son intensité. -Cette proposition est décisive pour l’Archicratie, car elle rappelle que la conflictualité n’est pas une menace extérieure à la démocratie, mais sa condition vitale. Mais elle rencontre aussi une limite nette : le cadre agonistique demeure souvent sous-déterminé. Mouffe dit peu de la manière dont ce cadre se constitue, se transforme ou devient lui-même objet de conflit ; elle formalise peu les prises concrètes, les rythmes, les dispositifs et les scènes capables de rendre ce dissensus effectivement traversable. Son apport est donc majeur, mais inachevé : elle stabilise la conflictualité sans encore lui donner toute l’épaisseur scénique et opératoire qu’exige une régulation archicratique. +Cette proposition est décisive pour l'Archicratie, car elle rappelle que +la conflictualité n'est pas une menace extérieure à la démocratie, mais +sa condition vitale. Mais elle rencontre aussi une limite nette : le +cadre agonistique demeure souvent sous-déterminé. Mouffe dit peu de la +manière dont ce cadre se constitue, se transforme ou devient lui-même +objet de conflit ; elle formalise peu les prises concrètes, les rythmes, +les dispositifs et les scènes capables de rendre ce dissensus +effectivement traversable. Son apport est donc majeur, mais inachevé : +elle stabilise la conflictualité sans encore lui donner toute +l'épaisseur scénique et opératoire qu'exige une régulation +archicratique. -Étienne Tassin déplace encore la question. Là où Rancière accentue l’irruption et Mouffe la conflictualité cadrée, Tassin rappelle que le dissensus n’a de portée politique qu’à l’intérieur d’un monde commun, c’est-à-dire d’un espace où les sujets peuvent apparaître les uns aux autres, s’exposer publiquement et risquer une parole adressée. Le conflit n’y est plus seulement rupture ou antagonisme ; il devient modalité d’un être-avec conflictuel, condition fragile d’une co-présence qui ne supprime ni l’étrangeté ni la pluralité. +Étienne Tassin déplace encore la question. Là où Rancière accentue +l'irruption et Mouffe la conflictualité cadrée, Tassin rappelle que le +dissensus n'a de portée politique qu'à l'intérieur d'un monde commun, +c'est-à-dire d'un espace où les sujets peuvent apparaître les uns aux +autres, s'exposer publiquement et risquer une parole adressée. Le +conflit n'y est plus seulement rupture ou antagonisme ; il devient +modalité d'un être-avec conflictuel, condition fragile d'une co-présence +qui ne supprime ni l'étrangeté ni la pluralité. -Cet apport est central pour l’archicratie. Il montre qu’aucune scène polémique n’est régulatrice si elle n’est pas aussi scène d’apparition, d’adresse et d’habitation partagée du dissensus. Mais il en révèle aussi la fragilité : lorsque le monde commun se désagrège, se numérise ou se désymbolise, le conflit ne disparaît pas ; il perd sa scène. Dès lors, la tâche archicratique ne consiste pas seulement à accueillir l’irruption ou à cadrer l’antagonisme, mais à instituer des formes dans lesquelles le dissensus puisse devenir visible, opposable et potentiellement instituant. +Cet apport est central pour l'archicratie. Il montre qu'aucune scène +polémique n'est régulatrice si elle n'est pas aussi scène d'apparition, +d'adresse et d'habitation partagée du dissensus. Mais il en révèle aussi +la fragilité : lorsque le monde commun se désagrège, se numérise ou se +désymbolise, le conflit ne disparaît pas ; il perd sa scène. Dès lors, +la tâche archicratique ne consiste pas seulement à accueillir +l'irruption ou à cadrer l'antagonisme, mais à instituer des formes dans +lesquelles le dissensus puisse devenir visible, opposable et +potentiellement instituant. -C’est la leçon commune que l’on peut tirer de Rancière, Mouffe et Tassin : la régulation ne s’oppose pas au conflit, elle suppose sa mise en forme. Encore faut-il que cette forme ne relève ni de l’incantation ni du pur événement, mais d’une scène praticable, traversable et susceptible de produire des effets. C’est précisément ce que les dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains tenteront de faire, en cherchant à donner au dissensus un lieu, un rythme et une consistance institutionnelle sans en annuler la charge conflictuelle. +C'est la leçon commune que l'on peut tirer de Rancière, Mouffe et Tassin +: la régulation ne s'oppose pas au conflit, elle suppose sa mise en +forme. Encore faut-il que cette forme ne relève ni de l'incantation ni +du pur événement, mais d'une scène praticable, traversable et +susceptible de produire des effets. C'est précisément ce que les +dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains tenteront de faire, en cherchant +à donner au dissensus un lieu, un rythme et une consistance +institutionnelle sans en annuler la charge conflictuelle. -### 3.5.4 — Régime expérimental et pluriel institutionnalisé : *une régulation mise à l’épreuve* +### 3.5.4 — Régime expérimental et pluriel institutionnalisé : *une régulation mise à l'épreuve* -Après la bureaucratie, la vacance symbolique et les scènes du dissensus, une dernière figure de la régulation procédurale doit être interrogée : celle des dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains, qui cherchent à rouvrir des scènes de parole, de confrontation et de participation là où les formes classiques de la démocratie représentative semblent épuisées. Assemblées tirées au sort, jurys citoyens, conventions thématiques, budgets participatifs ou forums hybrides ont en commun de déplacer la question de la régulation vers des formats situés, temporaires et pluralisés, où le commun est moins présupposé qu’éprouvé. +Après la bureaucratie, la vacance symbolique et les scènes du dissensus, +une dernière figure de la régulation procédurale doit être interrogée : +celle des dispositifs expérimentaux contemporains, qui cherchent à +rouvrir des scènes de parole, de confrontation et de participation là où +les formes classiques de la démocratie représentative semblent épuisées. +Assemblées tirées au sort, jurys citoyens, conventions thématiques, +budgets participatifs ou forums hybrides ont en commun de déplacer la +question de la régulation vers des formats situés, temporaires et +pluralisés, où le commun est moins présupposé qu'éprouvé. -L’enjeu n’est pas de célébrer ces expériences comme solutions, mais d’évaluer ce qu’elles rendent possible du point de vue archicratique. Constituent-elles de simples simulacres de conflictualité, ou bien des scènes pré-archicratiques où s’esquissent certaines conditions d’une véritable épreuve régulatrice ? C’est cette ambivalence qu’il faut analyser : ces dispositifs ouvrent des prises réelles, mais souvent fragiles, incomplètes, réversibles et inégalement reliées aux centres effectifs de décision. +L'enjeu n'est pas de célébrer ces expériences comme solutions, mais +d'évaluer ce qu'elles rendent possible du point de vue archicratique. +Constituent-elles de simples simulacres de conflictualité, ou bien des +scènes pré-archicratiques où s'esquissent certaines conditions d'une +véritable épreuve régulatrice ? C'est cette ambivalence qu'il faut +analyser : ces dispositifs ouvrent des prises réelles, mais souvent +fragiles, incomplètes, réversibles et inégalement reliées aux centres +effectifs de décision. -Le soubassement théorique de ces expérimentations peut être lu à travers trois figures majeures. Avec Dewey, la démocratie cesse d’être seulement un régime institutionnel pour devenir une méthode d’enquête collective, où les problèmes publics émergent de l’expérience partagée et de leur mise en discussion. Avec Fishkin, cette intuition se traduit dans des dispositifs précis de délibération informée, pensés comme scènes auxiliaires où l’opinion publique peut se reformer au contact d’informations pluralisées et d’échanges encadrés. Avec Landemore enfin, l’ouverture démocratique reçoit une portée plus normative : la pluralité des points de vue n’est plus seulement une exigence politique, mais une condition épistémique de robustesse des décisions collectives. +Le soubassement théorique de ces expérimentations peut être lu à travers +trois figures majeures. Avec Dewey, la démocratie cesse d'être seulement +un régime institutionnel pour devenir une méthode d'enquête collective, +où les problèmes publics émergent de l'expérience partagée et de leur +mise en discussion. Avec Fishkin, cette intuition se traduit dans des +dispositifs précis de délibération informée, pensés comme scènes +auxiliaires où l'opinion publique peut se reformer au contact +d'informations pluralisées et d'échanges encadrés. Avec Landemore enfin, +l'ouverture démocratique reçoit une portée plus normative : la pluralité +des points de vue n'est plus seulement une exigence politique, mais une +condition épistémique de robustesse des décisions collectives. -Ces trois approches convergent sur un point essentiel pour notre propos : elles cherchent toutes à rouvrir la scène politique à l’expérience, à l’incertitude, à la parole ordinaire et à la conflictualité, contre la clôture procédurale et la délégation sans retour. En ce sens, elles dessinent bien des formes pré-archicratiques. Mais cette convergence doit être immédiatement interrogée : ouvrir une scène de discussion ne suffit pas encore à produire une régulation traversable, opposable et instituante. +Ces trois approches convergent sur un point essentiel pour notre propos +: elles cherchent toutes à rouvrir la scène politique à l'expérience, à +l'incertitude, à la parole ordinaire et à la conflictualité, contre la +clôture procédurale et la délégation sans retour. En ce sens, elles +dessinent bien des formes pré-archicratiques. Mais cette convergence +doit être immédiatement interrogée : ouvrir une scène de discussion ne +suffit pas encore à produire une régulation traversable, opposable et +instituante. -Ces dispositifs ont un mérite réel : ils rouvrent des scènes de parole et de confrontation là où la démocratie représentative tend à se refermer sur des circuits spécialisés. Tirage au sort, délibération informée, confrontation de diagnostics, mise en commun d’expériences : autant de procédures qui permettent parfois de rendre visibles des désaccords, de reformuler les problèmes publics et de restituer à des sujets ordinaires une capacité de nomination et d’interpellation. À ce titre, ils ne sont ni de simples gadgets ni de purs simulacres. Ils introduisent bien des prises, faibles mais réelles, sur l’organisation du commun. +Ces dispositifs ont un mérite réel : ils rouvrent des scènes de parole +et de confrontation là où la démocratie représentative tend à se +refermer sur des circuits spécialisés. Tirage au sort, délibération +informée, confrontation de diagnostics, mise en commun d'expériences : +autant de procédures qui permettent parfois de rendre visibles des +désaccords, de reformuler les problèmes publics et de restituer à des +sujets ordinaires une capacité de nomination et d'interpellation. À ce +titre, ils ne sont ni de simples gadgets ni de purs simulacres. Ils +introduisent bien des prises, faibles mais réelles, sur l'organisation +du commun. -Mais leur limite est tout aussi nette. La plupart demeurent faiblement intégrés aux lieux effectifs de décision ; ils reposent sur des cadres d’autorité fragiles, souvent temporaires ; et ils restent généralement encadrés par des institutions dominantes qui fixent le périmètre des questions recevables. Le risque est alors que l’expérimentation ne serve moins à instituer le dissensus qu’à le contenir. C’est sur ce point que l’apport critique de Barbara Stiegler devient majeur : ce que le néolibéralisme valorise sous le nom d’expérimentation peut aussi devenir une technologie d’ajustement adaptatif, où la parole est sollicitée sans que la conflictualité acquière de véritable prise sur les structures. L’expérimentation démocratique se trouve ainsi prise dans une tension constitutive : avant-poste fragile d’une archicration possible, ou laboratoire d’un gouvernement par simulation. +Mais leur limite est tout aussi nette. La plupart demeurent faiblement +intégrés aux lieux effectifs de décision ; ils reposent sur des cadres +d'autorité fragiles, souvent temporaires ; et ils restent généralement +encadrés par des institutions dominantes qui fixent le périmètre des +questions recevables. Le risque est alors que l'expérimentation ne serve +moins à instituer le dissensus qu'à le contenir. C'est sur ce point que +l'apport critique de Barbara Stiegler devient majeur : ce que le +néolibéralisme valorise sous le nom d'expérimentation peut aussi devenir +une technologie d'ajustement adaptatif, où la parole est sollicitée sans +que la conflictualité acquière de véritable prise sur les structures. +L'expérimentation démocratique se trouve ainsi prise dans une tension +constitutive : avant-poste fragile d'une archicration possible, ou +laboratoire d'un gouvernement par simulation. -La question décisive devient alors la suivante : à quelles conditions une expérimentation démocratique cesse-t-elle d’être simple inclusion procédurale pour devenir scène archicratique effective ? Trois exigences apparaissent. D’abord, une arcalité suffisamment forte pour donner à la scène sa durée, sa mémoire et sa reconnaissabilité : sans cadre instituant, l’expérimentation demeure précaire et révocable. Ensuite, une cratialité réelle, c’est-à-dire une capacité des prises produites dans la scène à infléchir les normes, les décisions ou les catégories de l’action publique : sans effet possible, la parole reste décorative. Enfin, une archicration proprement dite, c’est-à-dire une épreuve visible, opposable et traversable, où les positions peuvent se répondre sans que le conflit soit neutralisé d’avance. +La question décisive devient alors la suivante : à quelles conditions +une expérimentation démocratique cesse-t-elle d'être simple inclusion +procédurale pour devenir scène archicratique effective ? Trois exigences +apparaissent. D'abord, une arcalité suffisamment forte pour donner à la +scène sa durée, sa mémoire et sa reconnaissabilité : sans cadre +instituant, l'expérimentation demeure précaire et révocable. Ensuite, +une cratialité réelle, c'est-à-dire une capacité des prises produites +dans la scène à infléchir les normes, les décisions ou les catégories de +l'action publique : sans effet possible, la parole reste décorative. +Enfin, une archicration proprement dite, c'est-à-dire une épreuve +visible, opposable et traversable, où les positions peuvent se répondre +sans que le conflit soit neutralisé d'avance. -C’est à cette aune que ces dispositifs doivent être évalués. Leur intérêt n’est pas de fournir une solution déjà constituée, mais de rendre perceptible ce qu’exige une régulation démocratique digne de ce nom : non une simple ouverture de la parole, mais l’institution de scènes où le dissensus peut produire des effets. Certaines expérimentations n’atteignent ces conditions que partiellement ; d’autres les simulent sans les réaliser ; d’autres encore ouvrent de véritables brèches, précisément parce qu’elles mettent en crise leur propre cadre et laissent la conflictualité travailler les règles du jeu. En ce sens, le régime expérimental ne vaut pas comme accomplissement de l’archicration, mais comme terrain d’épreuve où se mesurent, à l’état instable, ses possibilités et ses insuffisances. +C'est à cette aune que ces dispositifs doivent être évalués. Leur +intérêt n'est pas de fournir une solution déjà constituée, mais de +rendre perceptible ce qu'exige une régulation démocratique digne de ce +nom : non une simple ouverture de la parole, mais l'institution de +scènes où le dissensus peut produire des effets. Certaines +expérimentations n'atteignent ces conditions que partiellement ; +d'autres les simulent sans les réaliser ; d'autres encore ouvrent de +véritables brèches, précisément parce qu'elles mettent en crise leur +propre cadre et laissent la conflictualité travailler les règles du jeu. +En ce sens, le régime expérimental ne vaut pas comme accomplissement de +l'archicration, mais comme terrain d'épreuve où se mesurent, à l'état +instable, ses possibilités et ses insuffisances. -Cette section a permis d’établir une thèse décisive : la régulation politique ne peut être pensée ni comme simple procédure, ni comme vacance symbolique, ni comme surgissement conflictuel pur, ni même comme expérimentation participative laissée à elle-même. Dans tous les cas, le point crucial demeure le même : réguler, ce n’est pas neutraliser le dissensus, mais lui donner une scène. Une scène où des positions peuvent apparaître, se confronter, se répondre, et, sous certaines conditions, transformer les cadres mêmes du commun. +Cette section a permis d'établir une thèse décisive : la régulation +politique ne peut être pensée ni comme simple procédure, ni comme +vacance symbolique, ni comme surgissement conflictuel pur, ni même comme +expérimentation participative laissée à elle-même. Dans tous les cas, le +point crucial demeure le même : réguler, ce n'est pas neutraliser le +dissensus, mais lui donner une scène. Une scène où des positions peuvent +apparaître, se confronter, se répondre, et, sous certaines conditions, +transformer les cadres mêmes du commun. -Le parcours conduit de la bureaucratie aux dispositifs expérimentaux a ainsi fait apparaître plusieurs insuffisances symétriques : la forme procédurale tend à fermer l’épreuve au nom de l’impartialité ; la vacance du pouvoir risque de devenir abstraction si elle n’est pas rendue praticable ; le dissensus ne devient pas régulateur du seul fait de son irruption ; et les expérimentations démocratiques, si elles ouvrent des brèches réelles, restent souvent fragiles tant qu’elles ne disposent ni d’une arcalité solide, ni d’une cratialité effective, ni d’une archicration pleinement traversable. Ce que la section met donc en lumière, c’est l’exigence d’une mise en forme instituante du conflit : non sa disparition, non sa pacification, mais sa configuration publique dans des scènes capables de le rendre visible, opposable et transformateur. +Le parcours conduit de la bureaucratie aux dispositifs expérimentaux a +ainsi fait apparaître plusieurs insuffisances symétriques : la forme +procédurale tend à fermer l'épreuve au nom de l'impartialité ; la +vacance du pouvoir risque de devenir abstraction si elle n'est pas +rendue praticable ; le dissensus ne devient pas régulateur du seul fait +de son irruption ; et les expérimentations démocratiques, si elles +ouvrent des brèches réelles, restent souvent fragiles tant qu'elles ne +disposent ni d'une arcalité solide, ni d'une cratialité effective, ni +d'une archicration pleinement traversable. Ce que la section met donc en +lumière, c'est l'exigence d'une mise en forme instituante du conflit : +non sa disparition, non sa pacification, mais sa configuration publique +dans des scènes capables de le rendre visible, opposable et +transformateur. -Trois acquis peuvent alors être retenus. D’abord, aucune co-viabilité politique ne se soutient sans scènes de visibilité du dissensus. Ensuite, la conflictualité ne devient régulatrice qu’à condition d’être reprise dans des formes d’épreuve où elle puisse produire des effets. Enfin, la pluralité des scènes ne vaut que si leurs conditions de légitimité, de durée et d’adresse sont elles-mêmes configurées. C’est précisément ce que la triade archicratique permet de rendre pensable : une articulation entre cadre instituant, puissance agissante et scène d’épreuve, sans laquelle le commun demeure soit administré, soit abstrait, soit pulvérisé dans l’événement. +Trois acquis peuvent alors être retenus. D'abord, aucune co-viabilité +politique ne se soutient sans scènes de visibilité du dissensus. +Ensuite, la conflictualité ne devient régulatrice qu'à condition d'être +reprise dans des formes d'épreuve où elle puisse produire des effets. +Enfin, la pluralité des scènes ne vaut que si leurs conditions de +légitimité, de durée et d'adresse sont elles-mêmes configurées. C'est +précisément ce que la triade archicratique permet de rendre pensable : +une articulation entre cadre instituant, puissance agissante et scène +d'épreuve, sans laquelle le commun demeure soit administré, soit +abstrait, soit pulvérisé dans l'événement. -Mais c’est aussi à ce point que s’ouvre la question la plus critique de notre époque. Car si cette section a montré que la régulation exige une scène, la suivante devra affronter des régimes où la scène elle-même tend à s’effacer : non plus sous l’effet de la clôture juridique ou de l’abstraction symbolique, mais sous celui de protocoles, d’algorithmes et d’architectures machiniques qui calculent, anticipent et modulent sans passer par l’épreuve visible du dissensus. Le passage qui s’annonce est donc décisif : que devient la co-viabilité lorsqu’on passe de la scène au flux, de la parole au protocole, de la confrontation à la corrélation ? C’est ce basculement que nous devons maintenant explorer. +Mais c'est aussi à ce point que s'ouvre la question la plus critique de +notre époque. Car si cette section a montré que la régulation exige une +scène, la suivante devra affronter des régimes où la scène elle-même +tend à s'effacer : non plus sous l'effet de la clôture juridique ou de +l'abstraction symbolique, mais sous celui de protocoles, d'algorithmes +et d'architectures machiniques qui calculent, anticipent et modulent +sans passer par l'épreuve visible du dissensus. Le passage qui s'annonce +est donc décisif : que devient la co-viabilité lorsqu'on passe de la +scène au flux, de la parole au protocole, de la confrontation à la +corrélation ? C'est ce basculement que nous devons maintenant explorer. ## **3.6 — Régimes machino-techniques — *des*** *puissances modulées* -Une bascule s’opère ici dans notre parcours. Après les régimes où la régulation se déployait encore dans des scènes de parole, de justification, de procédure ou de confrontation, nous abordons des configurations où elle tend à s’effectuer par le calcul, le flux, l’architecture technique et l’anticipation. La machine n’y intervient plus seulement comme instrument au service d’une décision humaine identifiable : elle devient instance de tri, de modulation, de synchronisation et de préemption. C’est ce déplacement que nous désignons sous le nom de régimes machino-techniques. +Une bascule s'opère ici dans notre parcours. Après les régimes où la +régulation se déployait encore dans des scènes de parole, de +justification, de procédure ou de confrontation, nous abordons des +configurations où elle tend à s'effectuer par le calcul, le flux, +l'architecture technique et l'anticipation. La machine n'y intervient +plus seulement comme instrument au service d'une décision humaine +identifiable : elle devient instance de tri, de modulation, de +synchronisation et de préemption. C'est ce déplacement que nous +désignons sous le nom de régimes machino-techniques. -Il ne s’agit pas simplement d’ajouter la technique à l’analyse du politique, mais de prendre acte d’une transformation plus profonde : la régulation se recompose dans des dispositifs qui ne revendiquent ni souveraineté, ni autorité, ni même intention explicite, tout en reconfigurant silencieusement les conditions d’agir, de percevoir et de décider. Dès lors, l’épreuve archicratique devient décisive. Que devient l’arcalité lorsque l’ordre ne s’énonce plus, mais se déduit de corrélations et de protocoles ? Que devient la cratialité lorsque les puissances d’agir sont captées, orientées ou préemptées par des flux de données et des architectures de calcul ? Et que devient l’archicration lorsqu’il n’y a plus de scène explicite de confrontation, mais seulement des modulations continues, des paramétrages et des implémentations ? +Il ne s'agit pas simplement d'ajouter la technique à l'analyse du +politique, mais de prendre acte d'une transformation plus profonde : la +régulation se recompose dans des dispositifs qui ne revendiquent ni +souveraineté, ni autorité, ni même intention explicite, tout en +reconfigurant silencieusement les conditions d'agir, de percevoir et de +décider. Dès lors, l'épreuve archicratique devient décisive. Que devient +l'arcalité lorsque l'ordre ne s'énonce plus, mais se déduit de +corrélations et de protocoles ? Que devient la cratialité lorsque les +puissances d'agir sont captées, orientées ou préemptées par des flux de +données et des architectures de calcul ? Et que devient l'archicration +lorsqu'il n'y a plus de scène explicite de confrontation, mais seulement +des modulations continues, des paramétrages et des implémentations ? -Pour éprouver ce déplacement, nous traverserons quatre configurations philosophiques majeures. Avec Deleuze et Guattari, nous rencontrerons une pensée des agencements et des flux où la régulation se distribue sans centre dans des consistances machiniques. Avec Yuk Hui, la cosmotechnie ouvrira la possibilité d’une pluralité de régimes techniques ancrés dans des ontologies différenciées. Avec Bernard Stiegler, la grammatisation et la prolétarisation cognitive feront apparaître la question décisive du temps, de l’attention et de la désautomatisation comme conditions de toute reprise régulatrice. Avec Rouvroy et Berns enfin, la gouvernementalité algorithmique portera à son point extrême la figure d’une régulation sans sujet, sans scène et sans rupture. +Pour éprouver ce déplacement, nous traverserons quatre configurations +philosophiques majeures. Avec Deleuze et Guattari, nous rencontrerons +une pensée des agencements et des flux où la régulation se distribue +sans centre dans des consistances machiniques. Avec Yuk Hui, la +cosmotechnie ouvrira la possibilité d'une pluralité de régimes +techniques ancrés dans des ontologies différenciées. Avec Bernard +Stiegler, la grammatisation et la prolétarisation cognitive feront +apparaître la question décisive du temps, de l'attention et de la +désautomatisation comme conditions de toute reprise régulatrice. Avec +Rouvroy et Berns enfin, la gouvernementalité algorithmique portera à son +point extrême la figure d'une régulation sans sujet, sans scène et sans +rupture. -À travers cette séquence, il ne s’agira pas de penser la technique en général, mais de comprendre comment les régimes machino-techniques redistribuent les conditions mêmes de la co-viabilité. Car ce qu’ils mettent à l’épreuve, ce n’est rien de moins que la possibilité d’une scène régulatrice dans un monde où la modulation tend à remplacer l’institution, où le protocole tend à remplacer la parole, et où la corrélation tend à neutraliser le dissensus. +À travers cette séquence, il ne s'agira pas de penser la technique en +général, mais de comprendre comment les régimes machino-techniques +redistribuent les conditions mêmes de la co-viabilité. Car ce qu'ils +mettent à l'épreuve, ce n'est rien de moins que la possibilité d'une +scène régulatrice dans un monde où la modulation tend à remplacer +l'institution, où le protocole tend à remplacer la parole, et où la +corrélation tend à neutraliser le dissensus. -### 3.6.1 — Régimes d’agencements — *une régulation machinique* +### 3.6.1 — Régimes d'agencements — *une régulation machinique* -L’œuvre conjointe de Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari, notamment dans *L’Anti-Œdipe* (1972) et *Mille Plateaux* (1980), opère une torsion décisive de la pensée du pouvoir : elle déplace la régulation hors des catégories de souveraineté, d’institution et de norme, pour la reformuler à partir des flux, des agencements et des machines. La “machine” n’y désigne ni un simple outil ni une instance extérieure d’organisation, mais un processus immanent de connexion, de découpage et de transformation du réel. +L'œuvre conjointe de Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari, notamment dans +*L'Anti-Œdipe* (1972) et *Mille Plateaux* (1980), opère une torsion +décisive de la pensée du pouvoir : elle déplace la régulation hors des +catégories de souveraineté, d'institution et de norme, pour la +reformuler à partir des flux, des agencements et des machines. La +"machine" n'y désigne ni un simple outil ni une instance extérieure +d'organisation, mais un processus immanent de connexion, de découpage et +de transformation du réel. -La pensée deleuzo-guattarienne ne se formule évidemment pas selon la triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration que nous mobilisons ici. C’est précisément cette altérité qui en fait l’intérêt pour notre enquête : non parce qu’il faudrait la rabattre sur nos catégories, mais parce qu’elle permet d’en éprouver la plasticité face à une philosophie du flux, de l’agencement et de la consistance machinique. +La pensée deleuzo-guattarienne ne se formule évidemment pas selon la +triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration que nous mobilisons ici. C'est +précisément cette altérité qui en fait l'intérêt pour notre enquête : +non parce qu'il faudrait la rabattre sur nos catégories, mais parce +qu'elle permet d'en éprouver la plasticité face à une philosophie du +flux, de l'agencement et de la consistance machinique. -La *régulation*, chez Deleuze et Guattari, ne se pense jamais à partir de la norme, de la loi ou de l’institution. Elle ne s’inscrit pas dans l’horizon de la souveraineté, mais dans celui du *champ de consistance*. Elle n’émerge pas d’un centre de décision, mais se configure comme *modulation transversale des flux* — *flux de désirs, flux de matières, flux de signes, flux de capitaux*. Dès *L’Anti-Œdipe*, les auteurs affirment que : +La *régulation*, chez Deleuze et Guattari, ne se pense jamais à partir +de la norme, de la loi ou de l'institution. Elle ne s'inscrit pas dans +l'horizon de la souveraineté, mais dans celui du *champ de consistance*. +Elle n'émerge pas d'un centre de décision, mais se configure comme +*modulation transversale des flux* — *flux de désirs, flux de +matières, flux de signes, flux de capitaux*. Dès *L'Anti-Œdipe*, les +auteurs affirment que : -« La *machine sociale* ou *socius* peut être le corps de la Terre, le corps du Despote, le corps de l’Argent. Elle n’est jamais une projection du corps sans organes. C’est plutôt le corps sans organes qui est l’ultime résidu d’un socius déterritorialisé. Le problème du *socius* a toujours été celui-ci : *coder les flux du désir, les inscrire, les enregistrer, faire qu’aucun flux ne coule qui ne soit tamponné, canalisé, réglé*. » (Deleuze & Guattari, 1972, *Capitalisme et Schizophrénie 1*, p. 21) +« La *machine sociale* ou *socius* peut être le corps de la Terre, le +corps du Despote, le corps de l'Argent. Elle n'est jamais une projection +du corps sans organes. C'est plutôt le corps sans organes qui est +l'ultime résidu d'un socius déterritorialisé. Le problème du *socius* a +toujours été celui-ci : *coder les flux du désir, les inscrire, les +enregistrer, faire qu'aucun flux ne coule qui ne soit tamponné, +canalisé, réglé*. » (Deleuze & Guattari, 1972, *Capitalisme et +Schizophrénie 1*, p. 21) -Mais ces codes ne sont ni fixes ni imposés : ils sont continuellement reconfigurés, décodés et recodés selon les formes de ce qu’ils nomment la machine sociale. La *régulation* devient ainsi un *effet de surface* des agencements qui traversent un champ donné, un effet de capture et de redistribution des flux par les agencements collectifs d’énonciation. +Mais ces codes ne sont ni fixes ni imposés : ils sont continuellement +reconfigurés, décodés et recodés selon les formes de ce qu'ils nomment +la machine sociale. La *régulation* devient ainsi un *effet de surface* +des agencements qui traversent un champ donné, un effet de capture et de +redistribution des flux par les agencements collectifs d'énonciation. -C’est ici que se manifeste leur conception singulière de la *cratialité*. Pour Deleuze et Guattari, il n’y a pas de pouvoir substantiel, pas d’autorité fondatrice, mais des *micro-pouvoirs* *distribués, fragmentaires, mobiles*. Ce que Foucault nommait *pouvoir capillaire* est ici prolongé en une *ontologie du flux*, où le *désir* est la forme première de la puissance, non pas comme volonté de jouissance ou manque à combler, mais comme force de production : +C'est ici que se manifeste leur conception singulière de la +*cratialité*. Pour Deleuze et Guattari, il n'y a pas de pouvoir +substantiel, pas d'autorité fondatrice, mais des *micro-pouvoirs* +*distribués, fragmentaires, mobiles*. Ce que Foucault nommait *pouvoir +capillaire* est ici prolongé en une *ontologie du flux*, où le *désir* +est la forme première de la puissance, non pas comme volonté de +jouissance ou manque à combler, mais comme force de production : -« Si le désir produit, il produit du réel. Si le désir est producteur, il ne peut l’être qu’en réalité, et de réalité. Le désir est cet ensemble de synthèses passives qui machinent les objets partiels, les flux et les corps, et qui fonctionnent comme des unités de production. Le réel en découle, il est le résultat des synthèses passives du désir comme auto-production de l’inconscient. » (ibid., p. 18). +« Si le désir produit, il produit du réel. Si le désir est producteur, +il ne peut l'être qu'en réalité, et de réalité. Le désir est cet +ensemble de synthèses passives qui machinent les objets partiels, les +flux et les corps, et qui fonctionnent comme des unités de production. +Le réel en découle, il est le résultat des synthèses passives du désir +comme auto-production de l'inconscient. » (ibid., p. 18). -Ainsi, la *cratialité* n’est jamais une entité ou une intention, mais une *force transductive, inconsciente*, une capacité à connecter, à couper, à produire du réel. Elle est *machinique*, au sens où elle articule un *agencement de production* et non une intentionnalité politique. +Ainsi, la *cratialité* n'est jamais une entité ou une intention, mais +une *force transductive, inconsciente*, une capacité à connecter, à +couper, à produire du réel. Elle est *machinique*, au sens où elle +articule un *agencement de production* et non une intentionnalité +politique. -Dans ce cadre, l’arcalité n’est pas absente, mais radicalement transformée. Il n’y a plus de transcendance normative ni de structure a priori d’ordre légitime : les agencements produisent leur propre structuration immanente. L’ordre devient effet de plateau, stabilisation provisoire d’intensités, de segments et de connexions. Des figures comme le visage comme machine de surcodage, l’État comme reterritorialisation ou le corps sans organes comme seuil de déstructuration montrent bien que l’ordre ne précède pas les forces : il se cristallise à même elles, de façon toujours instable. +Dans ce cadre, l'arcalité n'est pas absente, mais radicalement +transformée. Il n'y a plus de transcendance normative ni de structure a +priori d'ordre légitime : les agencements produisent leur propre +structuration immanente. L'ordre devient effet de plateau, stabilisation +provisoire d'intensités, de segments et de connexions. Des figures comme +le visage comme machine de surcodage, l'État comme reterritorialisation +ou le corps sans organes comme seuil de déstructuration montrent bien +que l'ordre ne précède pas les forces : il se cristallise à même elles, +de façon toujours instable. -Quant à l’archicration, elle n’est pas absente chez Deleuze et Guattari, mais profondément déplacée. Elle ne prend pas la forme d’un acte de fondation, d’un protocole d’épreuve ou d’une scène explicite de légitimation ; elle se loge dans la consistance même de l’agencement, dans sa capacité à tenir, à durer, à se stabiliser provisoirement sans centre transcendant. L’instauration y devient donc effet d’agencement plutôt qu’acte instituant. En ce sens, la tension archicratique ne disparaît pas : elle se redistribue dans les flux eux-mêmes, selon une logique de déterritorialisation et de reterritorialisation continue. Le modèle de régulation qui en résulte n’est ni dialectique ni procédural, mais topologique et intensif. +Quant à l'archicration, elle n'est pas absente chez Deleuze et Guattari, +mais profondément déplacée. Elle ne prend pas la forme d'un acte de +fondation, d'un protocole d'épreuve ou d'une scène explicite de +légitimation ; elle se loge dans la consistance même de l'agencement, +dans sa capacité à tenir, à durer, à se stabiliser provisoirement sans +centre transcendant. L'instauration y devient donc effet d'agencement +plutôt qu'acte instituant. En ce sens, la tension archicratique ne +disparaît pas : elle se redistribue dans les flux eux-mêmes, selon une +logique de déterritorialisation et de reterritorialisation continue. Le +modèle de régulation qui en résulte n'est ni dialectique ni procédural, +mais topologique et intensif. -Cette redistribution de la tension archicratique ouvre une conception très singulière de la co-viabilité. Chez Deleuze et Guattari, celle-ci n’est ni donnée ni instituée par consensus ou contrat ; elle se produit à même des micro-agencements de désir, de corps et de signes, dans un processus toujours instable de composition d’écarts. La ligne de fuite n’y vaut pas comme dissolution du lien, mais comme condition de sa recréation. Mais c’est aussi là qu’apparaît l’ambiguïté critique du modèle : si toute régulation est modulation, où se situe encore l’épreuve ? Où une normativité peut-elle être interrogée, discutée, refusée ? Le dissensus demeure structurel, mais non discursif ; il se joue dans les bifurcations des flux davantage que dans des scènes explicites de confrontation. L’instauration reste donc possible, mais sous une forme fuyante, infra-instituée, toujours à reconfigurer. +Cette redistribution de la tension archicratique ouvre une conception +très singulière de la co-viabilité. Chez Deleuze et Guattari, celle-ci +n'est ni donnée ni instituée par consensus ou contrat ; elle se produit +à même des micro-agencements de désir, de corps et de signes, dans un +processus toujours instable de composition d'écarts. La ligne de fuite +n'y vaut pas comme dissolution du lien, mais comme condition de sa +recréation. Mais c'est aussi là qu'apparaît l'ambiguïté critique du +modèle : si toute régulation est modulation, où se situe encore +l'épreuve ? Où une normativité peut-elle être interrogée, discutée, +refusée ? Le dissensus demeure structurel, mais non discursif ; il se +joue dans les bifurcations des flux davantage que dans des scènes +explicites de confrontation. L'instauration reste donc possible, mais +sous une forme fuyante, infra-instituée, toujours à reconfigurer. -Une telle régulation paraît surtout opératoire dans des champs de haute plasticité — pratiques artistiques, expérimentations collectives, réseaux ouverts, formes d’organisation non hiérarchiques — où la coordination repose moins sur la norme explicite que sur la connexion, la bifurcation et la recomposition des agencements. Ces formes donnent à voir une viabilité située, différentielle, modulée, mais aussi fragile et souvent éphémère. C’est en cela que la pensée deleuzo-guattarienne constitue une épreuve décisive pour l’hypothèse archicratique : elle pousse à ses limites la cratialité, altère l’arcalité et déplace l’archicration vers une consistance infra-politique. Mais elle laisse ouverte la question la plus difficile : une régulation sans scène instituée, sans langage commun et sans confrontation explicite peut-elle durablement soutenir une co-viabilité partagée ? +Une telle régulation paraît surtout opératoire dans des champs de haute +plasticité — pratiques artistiques, expérimentations collectives, +réseaux ouverts, formes d'organisation non hiérarchiques — où la +coordination repose moins sur la norme explicite que sur la connexion, +la bifurcation et la recomposition des agencements. Ces formes donnent à +voir une viabilité située, différentielle, modulée, mais aussi fragile +et souvent éphémère. C'est en cela que la pensée deleuzo-guattarienne +constitue une épreuve décisive pour l'hypothèse archicratique : elle +pousse à ses limites la cratialité, altère l'arcalité et déplace +l'archicration vers une consistance infra-politique. Mais elle laisse +ouverte la question la plus difficile : une régulation sans scène +instituée, sans langage commun et sans confrontation explicite peut-elle +durablement soutenir une co-viabilité partagée ? ### 3.6.2 — Technodiversité et cosmotechnie — *une régulation post-universaliste* -Avec Yuk Hui, la réflexion sur les régimes machino-techniques se déplace sur un terrain majeur : celui de la pluralité des mondes techniques. Contre l’idée d’une rationalité technologique universelle, homogène et abstraitement instrumentale, il propose le concept de cosmotechnie, entendu comme articulation située entre des techniques, des cosmologies et des formes de vie. La technique n’y apparaît plus comme simple ensemble de moyens disponibles, mais comme médiation inséparable d’un rapport au monde, d’un horizon éthique et d’une orientation civilisationnelle. En ce sens, la technodiversité ne désigne pas une juxtaposition décorative de traditions, mais une contestation profonde de la techno-normalisation portée par l’universalisation moderne et, aujourd’hui, par le capitalisme computationnel global. +Avec Yuk Hui, la réflexion sur les régimes machino-techniques se déplace +sur un terrain majeur : celui de la pluralité des mondes techniques. +Contre l'idée d'une rationalité technologique universelle, homogène et +abstraitement instrumentale, il propose le concept de cosmotechnie, +entendu comme articulation située entre des techniques, des cosmologies +et des formes de vie. La technique n'y apparaît plus comme simple +ensemble de moyens disponibles, mais comme médiation inséparable d'un +rapport au monde, d'un horizon éthique et d'une orientation +civilisationnelle. En ce sens, la technodiversité ne désigne pas une +juxtaposition décorative de traditions, mais une contestation profonde +de la techno-normalisation portée par l'universalisation moderne et, +aujourd'hui, par le capitalisme computationnel global. -L’apport majeur de Yuk Hui tient à ceci : il déplace la question de la technique du registre de l’efficacité vers celui du sens. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de demander ce qu’une technique permet de faire, mais dans quel monde elle s’inscrit, quelles formes d’existence elle rend possibles, quelles temporalités elle soutient, quels rapports entre nature, culture et communauté elle présuppose. La régulation cesse alors d’être simple optimisation externe ou gouvernance algorithmique désincarnée ; elle devient problème cosmopolitique, au sens fort, parce qu’elle engage des ordres du monde différenciés. La technique n’est plus neutre, et la diversité technique ne relève plus d’une simple variation fonctionnelle : elle devient enjeu ontologique et politique. +L'apport majeur de Yuk Hui tient à ceci : il déplace la question de la +technique du registre de l'efficacité vers celui du sens. Il ne s'agit +plus seulement de demander ce qu'une technique permet de faire, mais +dans quel monde elle s'inscrit, quelles formes d'existence elle rend +possibles, quelles temporalités elle soutient, quels rapports entre +nature, culture et communauté elle présuppose. La régulation cesse alors +d'être simple optimisation externe ou gouvernance algorithmique +désincarnée ; elle devient problème cosmopolitique, au sens fort, parce +qu'elle engage des ordres du monde différenciés. La technique n'est plus +neutre, et la diversité technique ne relève plus d'une simple variation +fonctionnelle : elle devient enjeu ontologique et politique. -Relue à partir du paradigme archicratique, cette pensée permet de reconfigurer fortement l’arcalité. Yuk Hui ne propose pas un ordre normatif universel, mais une pluralité d’architectures de sens : l’ordre ne précède pas la technique, il émerge de l’articulation entre des pratiques techniques et des cosmologies sous-jacentes. L’arcalité y devient ainsi ontologique, contextuelle et non centralisée. Elle ne prend pas la forme d’une loi supérieure ni d’un cadre juridico-politique homogène, mais celle d’une cohérence située entre manières d’habiter, d’interpréter et de fabriquer le monde. L’idée même d’une “re-cosmologisation” de la technique désigne ce geste : réinscrire les objets, les dispositifs et les infrastructures dans des visions du monde irréductibles à l’universalisme techniciste. +Relue à partir du paradigme archicratique, cette pensée permet de +reconfigurer fortement l'arcalité. Yuk Hui ne propose pas un ordre +normatif universel, mais une pluralité d'architectures de sens : l'ordre +ne précède pas la technique, il émerge de l'articulation entre des +pratiques techniques et des cosmologies sous-jacentes. L'arcalité y +devient ainsi ontologique, contextuelle et non centralisée. Elle ne +prend pas la forme d'une loi supérieure ni d'un cadre juridico-politique +homogène, mais celle d'une cohérence située entre manières d'habiter, +d'interpréter et de fabriquer le monde. L'idée même d'une +"re-cosmologisation" de la technique désigne ce geste : réinscrire les +objets, les dispositifs et les infrastructures dans des visions du monde +irréductibles à l'universalisme techniciste. -La cratialité, de son côté, n’est ni pulsionnelle ni spectaculaire. Elle réside dans la possibilité de bifurquer, c’est-à-dire de rouvrir les devenirs techniques à d’autres orientations que celles imposées par l’universalisation technologique. Elle se concentre dans ces nœuds où une collectivité peut encore décider du type de monde qu’elle entend instituer, des dépendances qu’elle accepte ou refuse, des médiations qu’elle juge compatibles avec ses formes de vie. Cette puissance est discrète, mais décisive : elle ne s’exerce pas comme domination manifeste, mais comme capacité à interrompre l’évidence d’un devenir technique prétendument unique. +La cratialité, de son côté, n'est ni pulsionnelle ni spectaculaire. Elle +réside dans la possibilité de bifurquer, c'est-à-dire de rouvrir les +devenirs techniques à d'autres orientations que celles imposées par +l'universalisation technologique. Elle se concentre dans ces nœuds où +une collectivité peut encore décider du type de monde qu'elle entend +instituer, des dépendances qu'elle accepte ou refuse, des médiations +qu'elle juge compatibles avec ses formes de vie. Cette puissance est +discrète, mais décisive : elle ne s'exerce pas comme domination +manifeste, mais comme capacité à interrompre l'évidence d'un devenir +technique prétendument unique. -Quant à l’archicration, elle prend chez Yuk Hui la forme d’un geste réflexif de réorientation. Il ne s’agit ni d’une décision souveraine ni d’une simple modulation diffuse, mais d’une bifurcation régulatrice capable d’interrompre la linéarité apparente du progrès technique pour rouvrir des possibles situés. L’instauration ne passe donc pas ici par un protocole formel d’épreuve, mais par une reprise collective des rapports entre technique, monde et destin historique. En ce sens, l’archicration cosmotechnique demeure opérante, mais sous une forme lente, spéculative et profondément exigeante : elle suppose qu’un collectif soit encore capable de se rapporter réflexivement à ses propres médiations techniques. +Quant à l'archicration, elle prend chez Yuk Hui la forme d'un geste +réflexif de réorientation. Il ne s'agit ni d'une décision souveraine ni +d'une simple modulation diffuse, mais d'une bifurcation régulatrice +capable d'interrompre la linéarité apparente du progrès technique pour +rouvrir des possibles situés. L'instauration ne passe donc pas ici par +un protocole formel d'épreuve, mais par une reprise collective des +rapports entre technique, monde et destin historique. En ce sens, +l'archicration cosmotechnique demeure opérante, mais sous une forme +lente, spéculative et profondément exigeante : elle suppose qu'un +collectif soit encore capable de se rapporter réflexivement à ses +propres médiations techniques. -Une telle pensée autorise une conception forte, mais fragile, de la co-viabilité. Forte, parce qu’elle ouvre la possibilité de régimes techniques différenciés, attentifs aux temporalités propres, aux écologies locales et aux formes de vie singulières. Fragile, parce qu’elle repose sur des conditions de réflexivité rarement réunies : fidélité non folklorique à des traditions vivantes, capacité d’invention institutionnelle, aptitude à penser techniquement sans reconduire l’universalisme abstrait. À ce titre, la cosmotechnie ne fournit pas un programme immédiatement applicable ; elle indique plutôt une ligne de bifurcation, un horizon de réouverture, une exigence de pluralisation régulatrice. +Une telle pensée autorise une conception forte, mais fragile, de la +co-viabilité. Forte, parce qu'elle ouvre la possibilité de régimes +techniques différenciés, attentifs aux temporalités propres, aux +écologies locales et aux formes de vie singulières. Fragile, parce +qu'elle repose sur des conditions de réflexivité rarement réunies : +fidélité non folklorique à des traditions vivantes, capacité d'invention +institutionnelle, aptitude à penser techniquement sans reconduire +l'universalisme abstrait. À ce titre, la cosmotechnie ne fournit pas un +programme immédiatement applicable ; elle indique plutôt une ligne de +bifurcation, un horizon de réouverture, une exigence de pluralisation +régulatrice. -On peut néanmoins comprendre pourquoi cette pensée importe au plus haut point pour notre enquête. Elle donne forme à une régulation post-universaliste, où les techniques cessent d’être pensées comme infrastructures neutres pour redevenir des lieux de composition entre monde, sens, communauté et orientation collective. Elle suggère ainsi que la co-viabilité technique ne passe ni par la simple souveraineté étatique ni par l’abandon au marché global, mais par l’invention de cadres capables de relier pratiques, milieux et horizons de signification. Sous cet angle, la cosmotechnie n’est pas seulement une critique de l’universalisation ; elle est aussi une tentative de rouvrir les conditions d’une régulation située des devenirs techniques. +On peut néanmoins comprendre pourquoi cette pensée importe au plus haut +point pour notre enquête. Elle donne forme à une régulation +post-universaliste, où les techniques cessent d'être pensées comme +infrastructures neutres pour redevenir des lieux de composition entre +monde, sens, communauté et orientation collective. Elle suggère ainsi +que la co-viabilité technique ne passe ni par la simple souveraineté +étatique ni par l'abandon au marché global, mais par l'invention de +cadres capables de relier pratiques, milieux et horizons de +signification. Sous cet angle, la cosmotechnie n'est pas seulement une +critique de l'universalisation ; elle est aussi une tentative de rouvrir +les conditions d'une régulation située des devenirs techniques. -C’est pourtant ici que surgit sa difficulté principale. Si la cosmotechnie permet de pluraliser radicalement les régimes de sens, où se jouent concrètement les tensions, les confrontations et les arbitrages entre cosmotechniques hétérogènes ? Quelle scène commune peut accueillir ces différences sans les réduire à une norme unique ni les abandonner à un simple parallélisme ? La pensée de Yuk Hui pousse ainsi la pluralisation à un point tel qu’elle fragilise l’idée même d’un horizon régulateur commun. Elle constitue, pour l’Archicratie, une épreuve majeure : non parce qu’elle contredirait la nécessité de la régulation, mais parce qu’elle oblige à penser celle-ci dans un monde où aucun centre symbolique, aucune rationalité unifiée et aucun dispositif global de médiation ne peuvent plus aller de soi. +C'est pourtant ici que surgit sa difficulté principale. Si la +cosmotechnie permet de pluraliser radicalement les régimes de sens, où +se jouent concrètement les tensions, les confrontations et les +arbitrages entre cosmotechniques hétérogènes ? Quelle scène commune peut +accueillir ces différences sans les réduire à une norme unique ni les +abandonner à un simple parallélisme ? La pensée de Yuk Hui pousse ainsi +la pluralisation à un point tel qu'elle fragilise l'idée même d'un +horizon régulateur commun. Elle constitue, pour l'Archicratie, une +épreuve majeure : non parce qu'elle contredirait la nécessité de la +régulation, mais parce qu'elle oblige à penser celle-ci dans un monde où +aucun centre symbolique, aucune rationalité unifiée et aucun dispositif +global de médiation ne peuvent plus aller de soi. -La confrontation devient alors décisive. La cosmotechnie radicalise le multiple ; l’Archicratie tente d’en formaliser la scène. Toute la question est donc la suivante : comment penser une régulation qui ne sacrifie ni la pluralité des mondes techniques, ni la possibilité d’un commun disputable ? +La confrontation devient alors décisive. La cosmotechnie radicalise le +multiple ; l'Archicratie tente d'en formaliser la scène. Toute la +question est donc la suivante : comment penser une régulation qui ne +sacrifie ni la pluralité des mondes techniques, ni la possibilité d'un +commun disputable ? ### 3.6.3 — Grammatisation et prolétarisation cognitive — *une régulation industrielle* -Bernard Stiegler appartient à cette lignée de penseurs pour lesquels la technique ne saurait être réduite à un outil fonctionnel ou à un simple dispositif d’efficience extérieure. De La technique et le temps à La société automatique et Qu’appelle-t-on panser ?, son œuvre développe une pensée de la technique comme structure d’historicité et de formation du psychique comme du collectif. La technique n’y est ni adjuvant ni décor, mais condition même d’une temporalisation du monde et d’une mise en forme du nous. En ce sens, la régulation humaine est toujours déjà techno-logique. +Bernard Stiegler appartient à cette lignée de penseurs pour lesquels la +technique ne saurait être réduite à un outil fonctionnel ou à un simple +dispositif d'efficience extérieure. De La technique et le temps à La +société automatique et Qu'appelle-t-on panser ?, son œuvre développe une +pensée de la technique comme structure d'historicité et de formation du +psychique comme du collectif. La technique n'y est ni adjuvant ni décor, +mais condition même d'une temporalisation du monde et d'une mise en +forme du nous. En ce sens, la régulation humaine est toujours déjà +techno-logique. -À rebours de tout humanisme abstrait, Stiegler radicalise l’intuition simondonienne selon laquelle l’humain se constitue par l’extériorisation technique. Ce qu’il nomme rétention tertiaire désigne ces inscriptions matérielles de la mémoire — écriture, image, objet, archive, calcul, code — qui orientent l’individuation psychique et collective. Il n’y a donc ni pensée sans support, ni politique sans médialité, ni socialité sans extériorisation symbolique. Toute régulation suppose dès lors des milieux techniques de mémoire, de transmission et d’attention. +À rebours de tout humanisme abstrait, Stiegler radicalise l'intuition +simondonienne selon laquelle l'humain se constitue par l'extériorisation +technique. Ce qu'il nomme rétention tertiaire désigne ces inscriptions +matérielles de la mémoire — écriture, image, objet, archive, calcul, +code — qui orientent l'individuation psychique et collective. Il n'y a +donc ni pensée sans support, ni politique sans médialité, ni socialité +sans extériorisation symbolique. Toute régulation suppose dès lors des +milieux techniques de mémoire, de transmission et d'attention. -Le pivot de cette analyse est la grammatisation. Reprenant et prolongeant Leroi-Gourhan, Stiegler décrit l’histoire humaine comme celle de la discrétisation progressive des gestes, des perceptions et des savoirs par des dispositifs techniques qui transforment les continuités vécues en éléments manipulables. Chaque régime technique institue ainsi une nouvelle grammaire de l’action, de la perception et de la mémoire. La grammatisation ne constitue donc pas un phénomène secondaire : elle produit de nouveaux ordres temporels, cognitifs et sociaux, reconfigure les puissances d’attention et de désir, et ouvre ou ferme des possibilités d’individuation collective. +Le pivot de cette analyse est la grammatisation. Reprenant et +prolongeant Leroi-Gourhan, Stiegler décrit l'histoire humaine comme +celle de la discrétisation progressive des gestes, des perceptions et +des savoirs par des dispositifs techniques qui transforment les +continuités vécues en éléments manipulables. Chaque régime technique +institue ainsi une nouvelle grammaire de l'action, de la perception et +de la mémoire. La grammatisation ne constitue donc pas un phénomène +secondaire : elle produit de nouveaux ordres temporels, cognitifs et +sociaux, reconfigure les puissances d'attention et de désir, et ouvre ou +ferme des possibilités d'individuation collective. -Mais ce processus n’est jamais univoque. La technique est toujours pharmakon : à la fois remède et poison, condition de soin et risque de destruction. C’est ici que la pensée stieglerienne atteint sa force propre. La grammatisation algorithmique contemporaine — captation des traces, automatisation du jugement, désintermédiation cognitive — ne se borne pas à transformer les instruments ; elle désynchronise les régimes d’individuation. Elle rompt l’accord fragile entre temporalités psychiques, collectives et techniques, et produit ce que Stiegler analyse comme une prolétarisation généralisée : non plus seulement perte des savoir-faire, mais perte des savoirs-de-vivre et des savoirs-théoriser. La question n’est donc plus seulement celle de l’emprise technique, mais celle de la possibilité même, pour un collectif, de partager des horizons, des récits et des cadres d’attente. +Mais ce processus n'est jamais univoque. La technique est toujours +pharmakon : à la fois remède et poison, condition de soin et risque de +destruction. C'est ici que la pensée stieglerienne atteint sa force +propre. La grammatisation algorithmique contemporaine — captation des +traces, automatisation du jugement, désintermédiation cognitive — ne +se borne pas à transformer les instruments ; elle désynchronise les +régimes d'individuation. Elle rompt l'accord fragile entre temporalités +psychiques, collectives et techniques, et produit ce que Stiegler +analyse comme une prolétarisation généralisée : non plus seulement perte +des savoir-faire, mais perte des savoirs-de-vivre et des +savoirs-théoriser. La question n'est donc plus seulement celle de +l'emprise technique, mais celle de la possibilité même, pour un +collectif, de partager des horizons, des récits et des cadres d'attente. -Relue dans notre lexique, l’arcalité stieglerienne ne relève ni de l’État ni du droit ni d’un principe transcendant d’ordre. Elle réside dans la capacité d’un collectif à produire du temps commun, à instituer une mémoire transmissible, une attention partagée et une intelligibilité des devenirs. Ce que Stiegler appelle synchronisation symbolique constitue ici le noyau arcal : sans elle, il n’y a ni culture, ni éducation, ni scène commune d’anticipation et de transmission. Mais cette synchronisation est précisément ce que le capitalisme numérique disruptif défait. L’ordre doit alors être reconquis, recomposé, réinstitué à travers un soin technique du symbolique. +Relue dans notre lexique, l'arcalité stieglerienne ne relève ni de +l'État ni du droit ni d'un principe transcendant d'ordre. Elle réside +dans la capacité d'un collectif à produire du temps commun, à instituer +une mémoire transmissible, une attention partagée et une intelligibilité +des devenirs. Ce que Stiegler appelle synchronisation symbolique +constitue ici le noyau arcal : sans elle, il n'y a ni culture, ni +éducation, ni scène commune d'anticipation et de transmission. Mais +cette synchronisation est précisément ce que le capitalisme numérique +disruptif défait. L'ordre doit alors être reconquis, recomposé, +réinstitué à travers un soin technique du symbolique. -La cratialité, de son côté, n’est plus pensée comme souveraineté ou force brute. Elle réside dans la capacité d’un système technique à orienter le désir, à capter l’attention, à court-circuiter la délibération. L’économie libidinale devient ici décisive : industries culturelles, plateformes et médias numériques redistribuent les puissances d’investissement affectif en les automatisant. La cratialité devient ainsi prédictive, anticipante, hétéro-dirigée. Mais elle demeure un lieu de lutte. Toute la question est de savoir s’il est encore possible de ralentir les flux, de désautomatiser l’attention et de restaurer des formes de temporalité désirante qui ne soient pas immédiatement exploitées. +La cratialité, de son côté, n'est plus pensée comme souveraineté ou +force brute. Elle réside dans la capacité d'un système technique à +orienter le désir, à capter l'attention, à court-circuiter la +délibération. L'économie libidinale devient ici décisive : industries +culturelles, plateformes et médias numériques redistribuent les +puissances d'investissement affectif en les automatisant. La cratialité +devient ainsi prédictive, anticipante, hétéro-dirigée. Mais elle demeure +un lieu de lutte. Toute la question est de savoir s'il est encore +possible de ralentir les flux, de désautomatiser l'attention et de +restaurer des formes de temporalité désirante qui ne soient pas +immédiatement exploitées. -C’est dans cette tension que se loge l’archicration stieglerienne. Elle n’apparaît ni comme acte souverain ni comme fondation classique, mais comme geste de désautomatisation : une reprise noétique par laquelle un collectif tente de rouvrir, dans le pharmakon lui-même, les conditions d’une réindividuation. L’archicration devient alors capacité à produire du temps différé, à ménager une distance réflexive et à rouvrir une scène pour l’esprit. Elle ne vise pas l’efficience, mais la reprise, la capacitation, la relance d’une attention partagée. La régulation n’est viable qu’à la condition d’être pensée, soignée et instituée à nouveau dans des milieux techniques reconfigurés. +C'est dans cette tension que se loge l'archicration stieglerienne. Elle +n'apparaît ni comme acte souverain ni comme fondation classique, mais +comme geste de désautomatisation : une reprise noétique par laquelle un +collectif tente de rouvrir, dans le pharmakon lui-même, les conditions +d'une réindividuation. L'archicration devient alors capacité à produire +du temps différé, à ménager une distance réflexive et à rouvrir une +scène pour l'esprit. Elle ne vise pas l'efficience, mais la reprise, la +capacitation, la relance d'une attention partagée. La régulation n'est +viable qu'à la condition d'être pensée, soignée et instituée à nouveau +dans des milieux techniques reconfigurés. -Une telle pensée autorise une conception forte mais exigeante de la co-viabilité. Celle-ci ne se réduit pas à la stabilité ni à l’ajustement des intérêts ; elle désigne la capacité d’un collectif à différer son devenir, à rouvrir des scènes de reprise où désir, pensée, langage et symbolisation puissent être recomposés contre l’automatisation. En ce sens, Stiegler fournit un outillage théorique particulièrement puissant pour les milieux pédagogiques, cognitifs, artistiques ou institutionnels où peuvent être instaurées des conditions de lenteur, d’attention et de réflexivité. Mais c’est aussi là que surgit sa limite : comment instituer durablement de tels dispositifs sans qu’ils soient aussitôt réabsorbés par les logiques de marché, de capture attentionnelle ou de gestion technicienne ? +Une telle pensée autorise une conception forte mais exigeante de la +co-viabilité. Celle-ci ne se réduit pas à la stabilité ni à l'ajustement +des intérêts ; elle désigne la capacité d'un collectif à différer son +devenir, à rouvrir des scènes de reprise où désir, pensée, langage et +symbolisation puissent être recomposés contre l'automatisation. En ce +sens, Stiegler fournit un outillage théorique particulièrement puissant +pour les milieux pédagogiques, cognitifs, artistiques ou institutionnels +où peuvent être instaurées des conditions de lenteur, d'attention et de +réflexivité. Mais c'est aussi là que surgit sa limite : comment +instituer durablement de tels dispositifs sans qu'ils soient aussitôt +réabsorbés par les logiques de marché, de capture attentionnelle ou de +gestion technicienne ? -L’archicration, chez Stiegler, demeure souvent pensée dans la temporalité fragile de la reprise, du soin et de l’urgence. Elle peine parfois à se doter d’une architectonique politique pleinement explicite. C’est ici que l’hypothèse archicratique peut prolonger sa pensée. Là où Stiegler insiste sur la désautomatisation, l’Archicratie cherche à formaliser les épreuves régulatrices elles-mêmes, à articuler les temporalités du soin à des scènes de légitimation, de confrontation et de stabilisation. Elle permet ainsi de penser non seulement la reprise noétique, mais sa structuration en régime co-viable. +L'archicration, chez Stiegler, demeure souvent pensée dans la +temporalité fragile de la reprise, du soin et de l'urgence. Elle peine +parfois à se doter d'une architectonique politique pleinement explicite. +C'est ici que l'hypothèse archicratique peut prolonger sa pensée. Là où +Stiegler insiste sur la désautomatisation, l'Archicratie cherche à +formaliser les épreuves régulatrices elles-mêmes, à articuler les +temporalités du soin à des scènes de légitimation, de confrontation et +de stabilisation. Elle permet ainsi de penser non seulement la reprise +noétique, mais sa structuration en régime co-viable. -Ce déplacement n’annule en rien la dette envers Stiegler ; il en révèle plutôt la portée. Son œuvre constitue pour nous une épreuve fondamentale, parce qu’elle rappelle que toute régulation est pharmacologique et toujours menacée par sa propre automatisation. L’Archicratie ne pourra valoir qu’à condition d’assumer cette vulnérabilité comme donnée constitutive de toute scène régulatrice. En ce sens, la pensée stieglerienne ne se contente pas d’éclairer les régimes machino-techniques : elle oblige à penser la régulation comme soin du temps, de l’attention et du commun — autrement dit comme un geste qui ne consiste pas seulement à instituer, mais à panser. +Ce déplacement n'annule en rien la dette envers Stiegler ; il en révèle +plutôt la portée. Son œuvre constitue pour nous une épreuve +fondamentale, parce qu'elle rappelle que toute régulation est +pharmacologique et toujours menacée par sa propre automatisation. +L'Archicratie ne pourra valoir qu'à condition d'assumer cette +vulnérabilité comme donnée constitutive de toute scène régulatrice. En +ce sens, la pensée stieglerienne ne se contente pas d'éclairer les +régimes machino-techniques : elle oblige à penser la régulation comme +soin du temps, de l'attention et du commun — autrement dit comme un +geste qui ne consiste pas seulement à instituer, mais à panser. ### 3.6.4 — Gouvernementalité algorithmique — *une régulation sans sujet et sans rupture* -L’analyse développée par Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns sous le nom de gouvernementalité algorithmique constitue l’un des diagnostics les plus pénétrants sur les mutations contemporaines du pouvoir. Là où Foucault décrivait encore des dispositifs articulant normes, subjectivations et institutions, Rouvroy et Berns identifient l’émergence d’un régime post-discursif dans lequel la régulation ne passe plus prioritairement par la loi, la parole ou la délibération, mais par la captation et l’exploitation corrélationnelle de masses de données. Le pouvoir n’y vise plus à former des sujets, mais à anticiper, orienter et préempter les comportements. La régulation devient alors infra-linguistique, infra-politique, infra-normative : elle n’argumente plus, elle calcule ; elle n’institue plus, elle optimise ; elle ne tranche plus, elle ajuste. Ce déplacement engage une mutation anthropo-politique majeure, puisqu’il affecte à la fois les conditions de la liberté, de la normativité et de la légitimité. +L'analyse développée par Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns sous le nom +de gouvernementalité algorithmique constitue l'un des diagnostics les +plus pénétrants sur les mutations contemporaines du pouvoir. Là où +Foucault décrivait encore des dispositifs articulant normes, +subjectivations et institutions, Rouvroy et Berns identifient +l'émergence d'un régime post-discursif dans lequel la régulation ne +passe plus prioritairement par la loi, la parole ou la délibération, +mais par la captation et l'exploitation corrélationnelle de masses de +données. Le pouvoir n'y vise plus à former des sujets, mais à anticiper, +orienter et préempter les comportements. La régulation devient alors +infra-linguistique, infra-politique, infra-normative : elle n'argumente +plus, elle calcule ; elle n'institue plus, elle optimise ; elle ne +tranche plus, elle ajuste. Ce déplacement engage une mutation +anthropo-politique majeure, puisqu'il affecte à la fois les conditions +de la liberté, de la normativité et de la légitimité. -La configuration de l’arcalité y devient inédite. Elle ne repose plus sur des formes instituées — droit, État, morale, coutume — mais sur une architecture discrète d’optimisation comportementale où les normes explicites tendent à être remplacées par des normativités latentes. Ce que Rouvroy nomme une « normativité sans norme » désigne précisément cet alignement progressif des conduites sur des régularités statistiques, sans qu’aucune instance ne les énonce, ne les interprète ou ne les justifie publiquement. L’ordre ne vient plus d’un centre ; il émerge d’un profilage corrélé, d’une moyenne glissante, d’un ajustement adaptatif. L’arcalité ne disparaît donc pas : elle se diffuse, se désymbolise et se dé-référence, jusqu’à faire apparaître un ordre sans archè explicite, ce que l’hypothèse archicratique ne peut précisément accepter sans critique. +La configuration de l'arcalité y devient inédite. Elle ne repose plus +sur des formes instituées — droit, État, morale, coutume — mais sur +une architecture discrète d'optimisation comportementale où les normes +explicites tendent à être remplacées par des normativités latentes. Ce +que Rouvroy nomme une « normativité sans norme » désigne précisément cet +alignement progressif des conduites sur des régularités statistiques, +sans qu'aucune instance ne les énonce, ne les interprète ou ne les +justifie publiquement. L'ordre ne vient plus d'un centre ; il émerge +d'un profilage corrélé, d'une moyenne glissante, d'un ajustement +adaptatif. L'arcalité ne disparaît donc pas : elle se diffuse, se +désymbolise et se dé-référence, jusqu'à faire apparaître un ordre sans +archè explicite, ce que l'hypothèse archicratique ne peut précisément +accepter sans critique. -Quant à la cratialité, elle se trouve ici non pas mobilisée, mais neutralisée. Là où elle désigne d’ordinaire une énergie de conflictualité, de désir, d’affect ou de puissance instituante, la gouvernementalité algorithmique vise au contraire à désactiver les écarts avant qu’ils ne deviennent événements. Elle procède selon une logique préventive et probabiliste qui réduit la puissance à une anomalie comportementale à corriger ou à réintégrer. Le conflit n’y est plus affronté ; il est absorbé en amont. La cratialité devient ainsi statistique : non plus force à composer, mais bruit à réduire. C’est en cela que ce régime tend vers une société sans surprise, où l’institution se mue en simulation, la volonté en variable résiduelle, et le dissensus en dysfonctionnement. +Quant à la cratialité, elle se trouve ici non pas mobilisée, mais +neutralisée. Là où elle désigne d'ordinaire une énergie de +conflictualité, de désir, d'affect ou de puissance instituante, la +gouvernementalité algorithmique vise au contraire à désactiver les +écarts avant qu'ils ne deviennent événements. Elle procède selon une +logique préventive et probabiliste qui réduit la puissance à une +anomalie comportementale à corriger ou à réintégrer. Le conflit n'y est +plus affronté ; il est absorbé en amont. La cratialité devient ainsi +statistique : non plus force à composer, mais bruit à réduire. C'est en +cela que ce régime tend vers une société sans surprise, où l'institution +se mue en simulation, la volonté en variable résiduelle, et le dissensus +en dysfonctionnement. -Reste alors la question de l’archicration. À certains égards, il y a bien instauration : des protocoles sont déployés, des architectures opératoires configurent le monde, des environnements de conduite sont mis en place. Mais cette instauration échappe à toute réflexivité publique, à toute délibération et à toute inscription symbolique partagée. L’archicration devient implémentation : non plus décision, épreuve ou fondation, mais paramétrage silencieux. Le monde ne change pas par seuils visibles ; il s’actualise ligne après ligne de code. C’est pourquoi la critique archicratique doit ici être maximale : la gouvernementalité algorithmique ne supprime pas seulement le conflit, elle tend à dépolitiser l’archicration elle-même. +Reste alors la question de l'archicration. À certains égards, il y a +bien instauration : des protocoles sont déployés, des architectures +opératoires configurent le monde, des environnements de conduite sont +mis en place. Mais cette instauration échappe à toute réflexivité +publique, à toute délibération et à toute inscription symbolique +partagée. L'archicration devient implémentation : non plus décision, +épreuve ou fondation, mais paramétrage silencieux. Le monde ne change +pas par seuils visibles ; il s'actualise ligne après ligne de code. +C'est pourquoi la critique archicratique doit ici être maximale : la +gouvernementalité algorithmique ne supprime pas seulement le conflit, +elle tend à dépolitiser l'archicration elle-même. -La question de la co-viabilité devient alors cruciale. À première vue, tout semble fonctionner : les comportements s’ajustent, les risques sont anticipés, les populations sont gérées avec une remarquable fluidité. Mais cette fluidité recouvre une désactivation profonde des capacités instituantes. La co-viabilité n’y est plus une épreuve partagée ni une élaboration collective des conditions du vivre-ensemble ; elle devient un simple état d’ajustement comportemental, inféré à partir d’agrégats de données et de modèles prédictifs. Elle n’est ni négociée, ni explicitée, ni ressentie : elle est calculée. En ce sens, elle ne constitue pas une viabilité commune au sens fort, mais une co-compatibilité minimale, sans horizon symbolique partagé ni légitimation réciproque. +La question de la co-viabilité devient alors cruciale. À première vue, +tout semble fonctionner : les comportements s'ajustent, les risques sont +anticipés, les populations sont gérées avec une remarquable fluidité. +Mais cette fluidité recouvre une désactivation profonde des capacités +instituantes. La co-viabilité n'y est plus une épreuve partagée ni une +élaboration collective des conditions du vivre-ensemble ; elle devient +un simple état d'ajustement comportemental, inféré à partir d'agrégats +de données et de modèles prédictifs. Elle n'est ni négociée, ni +explicitée, ni ressentie : elle est calculée. En ce sens, elle ne +constitue pas une viabilité commune au sens fort, mais une +co-compatibilité minimale, sans horizon symbolique partagé ni +légitimation réciproque. -Le champ d’opérativité de ce régime montre à la fois sa puissance et sa limite. La gouvernementalité algorithmique excelle dans les espaces où les finalités peuvent être traduites en métriques et les comportements profilés en temps réel : logistique, publicité ciblée, sécurité prédictive, gestion des mobilités, tri social automatisé. Elle agit comme technologie d’environnement, en configurant le champ des possibles plutôt qu’en énonçant des interdits. Mais cette efficacité technique est inversement proportionnelle à sa capacité d’institution politique. Là où elle sait orienter les conduites, elle ne sait ni produire du commun, ni accueillir la dissension, ni instituer du symbolique. Elle régule les comportements, non le sens, la mémoire ou la légitimité. C’est pourquoi elle tend moins vers une politique du commun que vers une forme de nihilisme algorithmique. +Le champ d'opérativité de ce régime montre à la fois sa puissance et sa +limite. La gouvernementalité algorithmique excelle dans les espaces où +les finalités peuvent être traduites en métriques et les comportements +profilés en temps réel : logistique, publicité ciblée, sécurité +prédictive, gestion des mobilités, tri social automatisé. Elle agit +comme technologie d'environnement, en configurant le champ des possibles +plutôt qu'en énonçant des interdits. Mais cette efficacité technique est +inversement proportionnelle à sa capacité d'institution politique. Là où +elle sait orienter les conduites, elle ne sait ni produire du commun, ni +accueillir la dissension, ni instituer du symbolique. Elle régule les +comportements, non le sens, la mémoire ou la légitimité. C'est pourquoi +elle tend moins vers une politique du commun que vers une forme de +nihilisme algorithmique. -C’est dans cette béance que l’hypothèse archicratique trouve sa nécessité critique. Là où Rouvroy et Berns décrivent un pouvoir sans sujet, sans fondement explicite et sans scène de légitimation, l’Archicratie rappelle qu’aucune régulation viable ne peut faire l’économie d’une épreuve du commun. Elle ne s’oppose donc pas abstraitement au régime algorithmique ; elle le soumet à ses propres questions décisives : où sont ses scènes d’épreuve ? où sont ses médiations symboliques ? où s’élabore la légitimité de ce qu’il configure ? À chacune de ces questions, la gouvernementalité algorithmique répond par l’optimisation, l’implémentation discrète et l’effacement du sujet. C’est pourquoi elle constitue moins un régime archicratique qu’une de ses antithèses les plus radicales. +C'est dans cette béance que l'hypothèse archicratique trouve sa +nécessité critique. Là où Rouvroy et Berns décrivent un pouvoir sans +sujet, sans fondement explicite et sans scène de légitimation, +l'Archicratie rappelle qu'aucune régulation viable ne peut faire +l'économie d'une épreuve du commun. Elle ne s'oppose donc pas +abstraitement au régime algorithmique ; elle le soumet à ses propres +questions décisives : où sont ses scènes d'épreuve ? où sont ses +médiations symboliques ? où s'élabore la légitimité de ce qu'il +configure ? À chacune de ces questions, la gouvernementalité +algorithmique répond par l'optimisation, l'implémentation discrète et +l'effacement du sujet. C'est pourquoi elle constitue moins un régime +archicratique qu'une de ses antithèses les plus radicales. -Mais cette confrontation est aussi heuristique. La pensée de Rouvroy et Berns offre une cartographie irremplaçable des régulations sans scène, des normativités sans ancrage et des institutions sans langage. Elle oblige à penser comment réinstituer du symbolique, de la conflictualité et de la légitimation là même où le pouvoir prétend se déduire du calcul. En ce sens, elle ne se tient pas hors de l’Archicratie ; elle en constitue l’une des épreuves critiques majeures. Car ce que le pouvoir algorithmique traite comme résidu — conflit, incertitude, différend, parole — l’Archicratie le reconvoque comme noyau d’une régulation véritablement humaine. Toute la question devient alors celle-ci : comment rouvrir, au cœur même des architectures prédictives, des scènes d’archicration capables de restituer au commun sa dimension d’épreuve, de dispute et d’institution ? +Mais cette confrontation est aussi heuristique. La pensée de Rouvroy et +Berns offre une cartographie irremplaçable des régulations sans scène, +des normativités sans ancrage et des institutions sans langage. Elle +oblige à penser comment réinstituer du symbolique, de la conflictualité +et de la légitimation là même où le pouvoir prétend se déduire du +calcul. En ce sens, elle ne se tient pas hors de l'Archicratie ; elle en +constitue l'une des épreuves critiques majeures. Car ce que le pouvoir +algorithmique traite comme résidu — conflit, incertitude, différend, +parole — l'Archicratie le reconvoque comme noyau d'une régulation +véritablement humaine. Toute la question devient alors celle-ci : +comment rouvrir, au cœur même des architectures prédictives, des scènes +d'archicration capables de restituer au commun sa dimension d'épreuve, +de dispute et d'institution ? -À travers Deleuze & Guattari, Yuk Hui, Bernard Stiegler, puis Rouvroy & Berns, une leçon commune se dégage : il n’existe pas de régulation techniquement opérante qui ne charrie en même temps une ontologie implicite, une politique du monde et une certaine figure de la normativité. Les régimes machino-techniques ne suspendent donc pas la question du politique ; ils la déplacent, la reconfigurent et, parfois, la désymbolisent. C’est en cela qu’ils constituent une épreuve décisive pour l’hypothèse archicratique. +À travers Deleuze & Guattari, Yuk Hui, Bernard Stiegler, puis Rouvroy & +Berns, une leçon commune se dégage : il n'existe pas de régulation +techniquement opérante qui ne charrie en même temps une ontologie +implicite, une politique du monde et une certaine figure de la +normativité. Les régimes machino-techniques ne suspendent donc pas la +question du politique ; ils la déplacent, la reconfigurent et, parfois, +la désymbolisent. C'est en cela qu'ils constituent une épreuve décisive +pour l'hypothèse archicratique. -Avec Deleuze & Guattari, la régulation se déplace vers les flux, les agencements et les modulations sans centre. La cratialité s’y intensifie, l’arcalité s’y défixe, et l’archicration y subsiste sous une forme diffuse, infra-scénique et instable. Cette pensée ne formalise pas la triade, mais elle en éprouve la limite extrême : celle d’une co-viabilité créative, acéphale, difficile à stabiliser. +Avec Deleuze & Guattari, la régulation se déplace vers les flux, les +agencements et les modulations sans centre. La cratialité s'y +intensifie, l'arcalité s'y défixe, et l'archicration y subsiste sous une +forme diffuse, infra-scénique et instable. Cette pensée ne formalise pas +la triade, mais elle en éprouve la limite extrême : celle d'une +co-viabilité créative, acéphale, difficile à stabiliser. -Avec Yuk Hui, la régulation se reterritorialise dans des cosmotechniques hétérogènes, irréductibles à un universalisme technique unique. L’arcalité et la cratialité y deviennent situées, et l’archicration prend la forme d’une bifurcation possible des devenirs techniques. Cette pensée ouvre ainsi l’horizon d’une co-viabilité différenciée, mais au prix d’une question décisive : *comment maintenir une scène d’instauration sans dissoudre tout horizon commun ?* +Avec Yuk Hui, la régulation se reterritorialise dans des cosmotechniques +hétérogènes, irréductibles à un universalisme technique unique. +L'arcalité et la cratialité y deviennent situées, et l'archicration +prend la forme d'une bifurcation possible des devenirs techniques. Cette +pensée ouvre ainsi l'horizon d'une co-viabilité différenciée, mais au +prix d'une question décisive : *comment maintenir une scène +d'instauration sans dissoudre tout horizon commun ?* -Avec Bernard Stiegler, la triade se laisse approcher avec le plus de netteté : arcalité symbolique du temps partagé, cratialité industrielle de l’attention et du désir, archicration comme désautomatisation du milieu technique. La régulation y devient soin pharmacologique et travail de reprise contre la désynchronisation. C’est sans doute la pensée la plus proche de notre hypothèse, tout en en rappelant la fragilité constitutive. +Avec Bernard Stiegler, la triade se laisse approcher avec le plus de +netteté : arcalité symbolique du temps partagé, cratialité industrielle +de l'attention et du désir, archicration comme désautomatisation du +milieu technique. La régulation y devient soin pharmacologique et +travail de reprise contre la désynchronisation. C'est sans doute la +pensée la plus proche de notre hypothèse, tout en en rappelant la +fragilité constitutive. -Avec Rouvroy & Berns, nous touchons au point critique où la régulation tend à se retourner en calcul sans sujet, en normativité sans énonciation, en implémentation sans scène. La cratialité y est neutralisée, l’arcalité se dissout dans la corrélation, et l’archicration devient presque impensable. C’est précisément pourquoi cette pensée constitue pour l’Archicratie non un dehors, mais l’une de ses épreuves les plus radicales. +Avec Rouvroy & Berns, nous touchons au point critique où la régulation +tend à se retourner en calcul sans sujet, en normativité sans +énonciation, en implémentation sans scène. La cratialité y est +neutralisée, l'arcalité se dissout dans la corrélation, et +l'archicration devient presque impensable. C'est précisément pourquoi +cette pensée constitue pour l'Archicratie non un dehors, mais l'une de +ses épreuves les plus radicales. -De cette confrontation émerge un constat simple : aucune de ces pensées ne maintient explicitement et simultanément la co-tension entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Toutes en travaillent un fragment, une dissociation, une intensification ou une perte. L’apport propre de l’hypothèse archicratique consiste précisément à formaliser cette co-tension comme condition de lisibilité et de viabilité de la régulation. +De cette confrontation émerge un constat simple : aucune de ces pensées +ne maintient explicitement et simultanément la co-tension entre +arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Toutes en travaillent un fragment, +une dissociation, une intensification ou une perte. L'apport propre de +l'hypothèse archicratique consiste précisément à formaliser cette +co-tension comme condition de lisibilité et de viabilité de la +régulation. -Il ne s’agit donc ni de hiérarchiser ces pensées, ni de les annexer, mais de les prendre au sérieux comme épreuves critiques de notre propre proposition. Ce que ce chapitre met au jour, ce n’est pas la supériorité abstraite de l’Archicratie, mais sa nécessité méthodique : celle d’un cadre où la régulation puisse être pensée comme co-tension entre ordre, puissance et instauration, sans être dissoute ni dans la fluidité machinique, ni dans la capture technique, ni dans l’implémentation silencieuse. +Il ne s'agit donc ni de hiérarchiser ces pensées, ni de les annexer, +mais de les prendre au sérieux comme épreuves critiques de notre propre +proposition. Ce que ce chapitre met au jour, ce n'est pas la supériorité +abstraite de l'Archicratie, mais sa nécessité méthodique : celle d'un +cadre où la régulation puisse être pensée comme co-tension entre ordre, +puissance et instauration, sans être dissoute ni dans la fluidité +machinique, ni dans la capture technique, ni dans l'implémentation +silencieuse. -La section suivante prolongera cette mise à l’épreuve sous la forme d’un tableau morphogénétique comparé. Il s’agira d’y rendre plus lisibles les écarts, les proximités, les limites et les puissances de ces régimes philosophiques, afin de préciser les conditions d’une co-viabilité archicratique située. +La section suivante prolongera cette mise à l'épreuve sous la forme d'un +tableau morphogénétique comparé. Il s'agira d'y rendre plus lisibles les +écarts, les proximités, les limites et les puissances de ces régimes +philosophiques, afin de préciser les conditions d'une co-viabilité +archicratique située. -Car la régulation n’est jamais un état déjà là. Elle est toujours une épreuve à instituer, une traversée à configurer, une composition à rendre viable. C’est à cette condition seulement — en assumant la dissymétrie, le dissensus et la nécessité de leur mise en forme — qu’une pensée du technique peut encore contribuer à l’élaboration d’un monde habitable. +Car la régulation n'est jamais un état déjà là. Elle est toujours une +épreuve à instituer, une traversée à configurer, une composition à +rendre viable. C'est à cette condition seulement — en assumant la +dissymétrie, le dissensus et la nécessité de leur mise en forme — qu'une pensée du technique peut encore contribuer à l'élaboration d'un +monde habitable. ## **3.7 — Synthèse typologique des registres du pouvoir** -À l’issue du parcours engagé depuis l’ouverture de ce chapitre, une difficulté méthodologique et théorique se précise avec une acuité particulière : comment rendre comparables des pensées de la régulation qui ne partagent ni les mêmes objets, ni les mêmes horizons, ni les mêmes régimes d’énonciation, sans les réduire à une langue commune qui en trahirait la singularité ? Car ce que la traversée de Hobbes, Rousseau, Weber, Schmitt, Foucault, Habermas, Rancière, Ostrom, Mauss, Spinoza, Arendt, Lefort, Bourdieu, Simondon, Rosa, Latour, Deleuze et Guattari, Yuk Hui, Bernard Stiegler, puis Rouvroy et Berns a progressivement rendu manifeste, ce n’est pas la convergence implicite de doctrines hétérogènes vers une même structure, mais bien la dispersion des manières de penser ce qui fait tenir un monde — dispersion irréductible, dont toute totalisation précipitée manquerait la portée. +À l'issue du parcours engagé depuis l'ouverture de ce chapitre, une +difficulté méthodologique et théorique se précise avec une acuité +particulière : comment rendre comparables des pensées de la régulation +qui ne partagent ni les mêmes objets, ni les mêmes horizons, ni les +mêmes régimes d'énonciation, sans les réduire à une langue commune qui +en trahirait la singularité ? Car ce que la traversée de Hobbes, +Rousseau, Weber, Schmitt, Foucault, Habermas, Rancière, Ostrom, Mauss, +Spinoza, Arendt, Lefort, Bourdieu, Simondon, Rosa, Latour, Deleuze et +Guattari, Yuk Hui, Bernard Stiegler, puis Rouvroy et Berns a +progressivement rendu manifeste, ce n'est pas la convergence implicite +de doctrines hétérogènes vers une même structure, mais bien la +dispersion des manières de penser ce qui fait tenir un monde — dispersion irréductible, dont toute totalisation précipitée manquerait +la portée. -Il s’agit désormais moins de prolonger l’exégèse ou d’ajouter une lecture supplémentaire que d’opérer un déplacement de plan : passer de l’analyse des configurations singulières à une mise en intelligibilité de leurs écarts, de leurs recouvrements partiels et de leurs tensions différentielles. Une telle opération ne peut prendre la forme d’une synthèse au sens classique, c’est-à-dire d’un rassemblement ordonné sous un principe unificateur. Elle exige au contraire une retenue : maintenir ouvertes les différences, préserver les hétérogénéités, et accepter que ce qui devient lisible ne le soit qu’à condition de ne pas être subsumé. +Il s'agit désormais moins de prolonger l'exégèse ou d'ajouter une +lecture supplémentaire que d'opérer un déplacement de plan : passer de +l'analyse des configurations singulières à une mise en intelligibilité +de leurs écarts, de leurs recouvrements partiels et de leurs tensions +différentielles. Une telle opération ne peut prendre la forme d'une +synthèse au sens classique, c'est-à-dire d'un rassemblement ordonné sous +un principe unificateur. Elle exige au contraire une retenue : maintenir +ouvertes les différences, préserver les hétérogénéités, et accepter que +ce qui devient lisible ne le soit qu'à condition de ne pas être subsumé. -Cette précaution s’impose d’autant plus que les pensées mobilisées ne se situent pas toutes sur un même plan. Certaines proposent des modèles explicites de la régulation politique ; d’autres élaborent des diagnostics critiques sur les formes contemporaines du pouvoir ; d’autres encore déplacent la question vers des ontologies du social, du technique ou du désir qui excèdent le cadre institutionnel. Les faire entrer dans une même grille reviendrait à les aplanir. La tâche consiste plutôt à isoler, à même ces pensées, des configurations opératoires — des manières de nouer force, ordre et exposition — susceptibles d’être mises en regard sans être assimilées. +Cette précaution s'impose d'autant plus que les pensées mobilisées ne se +situent pas toutes sur un même plan. Certaines proposent des modèles +explicites de la régulation politique ; d'autres élaborent des +diagnostics critiques sur les formes contemporaines du pouvoir ; +d'autres encore déplacent la question vers des ontologies du social, du +technique ou du désir qui excèdent le cadre institutionnel. Les faire +entrer dans une même grille reviendrait à les aplanir. La tâche consiste +plutôt à isoler, à même ces pensées, des configurations opératoires — des manières de nouer force, ordre et exposition — susceptibles d'être +mises en regard sans être assimilées. -Les tableaux synoptiques correspondants sont reportés en annexes, afin de ne pas rompre ici la continuité de l’analyse. +Les tableaux synoptiques correspondants sont reportés en annexes, afin +de ne pas rompre ici la continuité de l'analyse. -C’est en ce sens seulement qu’une « synthèse typologique » peut être envisagée : non comme classement des auteurs ni comme hiérarchisation des régimes, mais comme élaboration d’un espace de lisibilité où apparaissent des lignes de différenciation. Ces lignes ne sont pas des catégories, mais des directions de lecture : elles montrent selon quels axes les configurations se distinguent, se rapprochent ou se transforment. Leur fonction n’est pas de fixer des positions, mais de rendre sensibles des variations. +C'est en ce sens seulement qu'une « synthèse typologique » peut être +envisagée : non comme classement des auteurs ni comme hiérarchisation +des régimes, mais comme élaboration d'un espace de lisibilité où +apparaissent des lignes de différenciation. Ces lignes ne sont pas des +catégories, mais des directions de lecture : elles montrent selon quels +axes les configurations se distinguent, se rapprochent ou se +transforment. Leur fonction n'est pas de fixer des positions, mais de +rendre sensibles des variations. -Trois de ces lignes se sont progressivement imposées au fil du chapitre, non comme des concepts plaqués, mais comme des opérateurs descriptifs issus de l’analyse elle-même : ce que nous avons nommé arcalité, cratialité et archicration. Leur fonction, ici, consiste à permettre une mise en tension contrôlée des configurations étudiées, non à servir de grille interprétative universelle. Elles ne disent pas ce que les auteurs « pensent », mais ce que leurs analyses rendent visible quant aux conditions de tenue d’un ordre, à la manière dont il s’exécute, et aux formes sous lesquelles il peut encore être exposé à l’épreuve. +Trois de ces lignes se sont progressivement imposées au fil du chapitre, +non comme des concepts plaqués, mais comme des opérateurs descriptifs +issus de l'analyse elle-même : ce que nous avons nommé arcalité, +cratialité et archicration. Leur fonction, ici, consiste à permettre une +mise en tension contrôlée des configurations étudiées, non à servir de +grille interprétative universelle. Elles ne disent pas ce que les +auteurs « pensent », mais ce que leurs analyses rendent visible quant +aux conditions de tenue d'un ordre, à la manière dont il s'exécute, et +aux formes sous lesquelles il peut encore être exposé à l'épreuve. -L’arcalité désigne ainsi, de manière minimale, les modalités selon lesquelles un ordre se fonde, se justifie ou se transmet — qu’il s’agisse d’un contrat, d’une tradition, d’une norme diffuse ou d’une architecture technique. La cratialité renvoie aux formes d’effectuation, aux modes d’exercice de la puissance, qu’ils prennent la figure d’une souveraineté centralisée, d’une bureaucratie, d’un réseau de dispositifs ou d’une modulation algorithmique. Quant à l’archicration, elle permet de qualifier le statut de la scène : la manière dont un régime se rend — ou non — exposable, contestable, transformable. +L'arcalité désigne ainsi, de manière minimale, les modalités selon +lesquelles un ordre se fonde, se justifie ou se transmet — qu'il +s'agisse d'un contrat, d'une tradition, d'une norme diffuse ou d'une +architecture technique. La cratialité renvoie aux formes d'effectuation, +aux modes d'exercice de la puissance, qu'ils prennent la figure d'une +souveraineté centralisée, d'une bureaucratie, d'un réseau de dispositifs +ou d'une modulation algorithmique. Quant à l'archicration, elle permet +de qualifier le statut de la scène : la manière dont un régime se rend — ou non — exposable, contestable, transformable. -Mais il importe de le redire avec insistance : ces trois dimensions ne sont pas des catégories substantielles, encore moins des critères d’évaluation normatifs. Elles sont des opérateurs de lecture, dont la validité dépend précisément de leur capacité à ne pas écraser ce qu’elles décrivent. Leur usage exige donc une vigilance constante : ne jamais faire dire aux auteurs ce qu’ils ne disent pas, ne jamais projeter sur eux une architecture qui leur serait étrangère, ne jamais transformer un outil de comparaison en dispositif d’annexion. +Mais il importe de le redire avec insistance : ces trois dimensions ne +sont pas des catégories substantielles, encore moins des critères +d'évaluation normatifs. Elles sont des opérateurs de lecture, dont la +validité dépend précisément de leur capacité à ne pas écraser ce +qu'elles décrivent. Leur usage exige donc une vigilance constante : ne +jamais faire dire aux auteurs ce qu'ils ne disent pas, ne jamais +projeter sur eux une architecture qui leur serait étrangère, ne jamais +transformer un outil de comparaison en dispositif d'annexion. -Ce scrupule n’est pas seulement une exigence de probité académique ; il conditionne la portée même de l’hypothèse archicratique. Car si celle-ci ne vaut que comme grille capable d’absorber et de redistribuer toutes les pensées rencontrées, alors elle ne produit rien d’autre qu’un effet de domination théorique. Elle ne devient opératoire qu’à la condition inverse : en se laissant affecter par les configurations qu’elle met en regard, en acceptant que certaines lui résistent, en reconnaissant que ses propres limites se dessinent dans cet exercice. +Ce scrupule n'est pas seulement une exigence de probité académique ; il +conditionne la portée même de l'hypothèse archicratique. Car si celle-ci +ne vaut que comme grille capable d'absorber et de redistribuer toutes +les pensées rencontrées, alors elle ne produit rien d'autre qu'un effet +de domination théorique. Elle ne devient opératoire qu'à la condition +inverse : en se laissant affecter par les configurations qu'elle met en +regard, en acceptant que certaines lui résistent, en reconnaissant que +ses propres limites se dessinent dans cet exercice. -C’est pourquoi la synthèse qui s’engage ici doit être comprise comme une mise à l’épreuve réciproque. Les pensées étudiées éclairent les dimensions de l’archicratie, mais l’archicratie, en retour, ne se maintient qu’en se laissant déstabiliser par elles. Ce jeu de tensions interdit toute clôture prématurée : il ne s’agit ni de conclure, ni de stabiliser définitivement un modèle, mais de rendre pensable un espace de variations. +C'est pourquoi la synthèse qui s'engage ici doit être comprise comme une +mise à l'épreuve réciproque. Les pensées étudiées éclairent les +dimensions de l'archicratie, mais l'archicratie, en retour, ne se +maintient qu'en se laissant déstabiliser par elles. Ce jeu de tensions +interdit toute clôture prématurée : il ne s'agit ni de conclure, ni de +stabiliser définitivement un modèle, mais de rendre pensable un espace +de variations. -Dans cet espace, certaines configurations apparaissent comme privilégiant fortement l’exécution au détriment de la scène ; d’autres, au contraire, ouvrent largement la scène mais peinent à assurer l’effectivité ; d’autres encore déplacent la régulation vers des dispositifs où la scène tend à s’effacer. D’autres enfin explorent des formes de recomposition, où ces dimensions entrent dans des rapports plus complexes. Ce sont ces figures, non comme types fixes mais comme configurations tendancielles, que les sections suivantes vont déployer. +Dans cet espace, certaines configurations apparaissent comme +privilégiant fortement l'exécution au détriment de la scène ; d'autres, +au contraire, ouvrent largement la scène mais peinent à assurer +l'effectivité ; d'autres encore déplacent la régulation vers des +dispositifs où la scène tend à s'effacer. D'autres enfin explorent des +formes de recomposition, où ces dimensions entrent dans des rapports +plus complexes. Ce sont ces figures, non comme types fixes mais comme +configurations tendancielles, que les sections suivantes vont déployer. -Ce déplacement vers une topologie différentielle des régimes régulateurs ne vise donc pas à produire un tableau achevé du pouvoir, mais à rendre intelligible ce qui, dans chaque configuration, fait tenir ou défaire une co-viabilité. Il ne s’agit pas de dire quel régime serait préférable, mais de comprendre à quelles conditions un régime peut encore soutenir un monde commun sans en neutraliser les tensions constitutives. +Ce déplacement vers une topologie différentielle des régimes régulateurs +ne vise donc pas à produire un tableau achevé du pouvoir, mais à rendre +intelligible ce qui, dans chaque configuration, fait tenir ou défaire +une co-viabilité. Il ne s'agit pas de dire quel régime serait +préférable, mais de comprendre à quelles conditions un régime peut +encore soutenir un monde commun sans en neutraliser les tensions +constitutives. -C’est à partir de cette exigence que la section suivante cherchera à dégager, à même les régimes analysés, les lignes selon lesquelles se redistribuent les rapports entre fondation, effectuation et exposition, afin de penser, sans réduction, la diversité des formes de régulation. +C'est à partir de cette exigence que la section suivante cherchera à +dégager, à même les régimes analysés, les lignes selon lesquelles se +redistribuent les rapports entre fondation, effectuation et exposition, +afin de penser, sans réduction, la diversité des formes de régulation. ### **3.7.1 — Lignes différentielles de la régulation** -Ce qui devient progressivement lisible, à mesure que l’on traverse les configurations hétérogènes étudiées, ce n’est pas l’existence de types stabilisés ni la possibilité de les ordonner selon une logique classificatoire, mais l’émergence de lignes de différenciation qui traversent les pensées elles-mêmes, les travaillent de l’intérieur et les mettent en variation. Ces lignes ne sont ni des catégories, ni des propriétés assignables une fois pour toutes ; elles sont des directions selon lesquelles les régimes se configurent, se déplacent, se déséquilibrent ou se recomposent. En ce sens, elles ne valent que comme opérateurs de lisibilité : elles permettent de rendre sensibles des écarts sans prétendre les résorber. +Ce qui devient progressivement lisible, à mesure que l'on traverse les +configurations hétérogènes étudiées, ce n'est pas l'existence de types +stabilisés ni la possibilité de les ordonner selon une logique +classificatoire, mais l'émergence de lignes de différenciation qui +traversent les pensées elles-mêmes, les travaillent de l'intérieur et +les mettent en variation. Ces lignes ne sont ni des catégories, ni des +propriétés assignables une fois pour toutes ; elles sont des directions +selon lesquelles les régimes se configurent, se déplacent, se +déséquilibrent ou se recomposent. En ce sens, elles ne valent que comme +opérateurs de lisibilité : elles permettent de rendre sensibles des +écarts sans prétendre les résorber. -Une première ligne, déjà entrevue à plusieurs reprises mais qui trouve ici son statut explicite, concerne les modalités de fondation et de transmission de l’ordre — ce que nous avons nommé, faute de terme plus adéquat, arcalité. D’emblée, cette dimension ne se laisse pas réduire à l’opposition entre fondation explicite et absence de fondement. Chez Hobbes, l’ordre procède d’un geste inaugural, contractuel, qui institue une autorité capable de garantir la sûreté ; chez Rousseau, la co-viabilité repose non plus sur la contrainte centralisée, mais sur l’intériorisation du commun ; chez Weber, il se distribue entre tradition, charisme et légalité rationnelle, sans jamais se réduire à une origine unique. Mais déjà, avec Mauss, l’ordre apparaît comme tissé dans des obligations réciproques qui ne relèvent ni d’un contrat explicite ni d’une pure spontanéité, tandis que chez Bourdieu, il s’inscrit dans des habitus, des structures incorporées qui orientent les pratiques sans passer par la conscience ni la décision. +Une première ligne, déjà entrevue à plusieurs reprises mais qui trouve +ici son statut explicite, concerne les modalités de fondation et de +transmission de l'ordre — ce que nous avons nommé, faute de terme plus +adéquat, arcalité. D'emblée, cette dimension ne se laisse pas réduire à +l'opposition entre fondation explicite et absence de fondement. Chez +Hobbes, l'ordre procède d'un geste inaugural, contractuel, qui institue +une autorité capable de garantir la sûreté ; chez Rousseau, la +co-viabilité repose non plus sur la contrainte centralisée, mais sur +l'intériorisation du commun ; chez Weber, il se distribue entre +tradition, charisme et légalité rationnelle, sans jamais se réduire à +une origine unique. Mais déjà, avec Mauss, l'ordre apparaît comme tissé +dans des obligations réciproques qui ne relèvent ni d'un contrat +explicite ni d'une pure spontanéité, tandis que chez Bourdieu, il +s'inscrit dans des habitus, des structures incorporées qui orientent les +pratiques sans passer par la conscience ni la décision. -Ce déplacement se prolonge encore chez Simondon, pour qui la structuration ne précède pas les processus, mais émerge de l’individuation elle-même, ou chez Latour, où l’ordre ne peut plus être pensé comme transcendant aux réseaux d’actants qui le composent. De même, chez Rosa, la stabilité d’un monde dépend moins de fondements fixes que de régimes de résonance, c’est-à-dire de la qualité des relations qui permettent aux sujets d’entrer en rapport avec leur environnement. Dans ces configurations, l’arcalité ne disparaît pas ; elle se reconfigure, devenant tantôt immanente aux pratiques, tantôt incorporée, tantôt relationnelle. Elle cesse ainsi d’apparaître comme principe unique pour se distribuer dans des conditions de tenue variables selon les milieux, les temporalités et les formes de vie. +Ce déplacement se prolonge encore chez Simondon, pour qui la +structuration ne précède pas les processus, mais émerge de +l'individuation elle-même, ou chez Latour, où l'ordre ne peut plus être +pensé comme transcendant aux réseaux d'actants qui le composent. De +même, chez Rosa, la stabilité d'un monde dépend moins de fondements +fixes que de régimes de résonance, c'est-à-dire de la qualité des +relations qui permettent aux sujets d'entrer en rapport avec leur +environnement. Dans ces configurations, l'arcalité ne disparaît pas ; +elle se reconfigure, devenant tantôt immanente aux pratiques, tantôt +incorporée, tantôt relationnelle. Elle cesse ainsi d'apparaître comme +principe unique pour se distribuer dans des conditions de tenue +variables selon les milieux, les temporalités et les formes de vie. -Une deuxième ligne traverse ces configurations, celle des modalités d’effectuation — ce que nous avons désigné comme cratialité. Ici encore, la diversité des formes interdit toute réduction. Dans certaines configurations, la puissance s’exerce de manière centralisée, identifiable, concentrée : le souverain hobbesien, la décision schmittienne, ou encore, sous une forme rationalisée, l’appareil bureaucratique weberien. Mais dès que l’on se déplace vers d’autres pensées, cette centralité se dissout. Chez Foucault, la puissance devient capillaire, distribuée à travers des dispositifs, des normes, des techniques de gouvernement qui opèrent sans centre unique ; chez Deleuze et Guattari, elle se reformule comme flux désirants, comme capacités de connexion et de transformation qui ne relèvent d’aucune instance souveraine. +Une deuxième ligne traverse ces configurations, celle des modalités +d'effectuation — ce que nous avons désigné comme cratialité. Ici +encore, la diversité des formes interdit toute réduction. Dans certaines +configurations, la puissance s'exerce de manière centralisée, +identifiable, concentrée : le souverain hobbesien, la décision +schmittienne, ou encore, sous une forme rationalisée, l'appareil +bureaucratique weberien. Mais dès que l'on se déplace vers d'autres +pensées, cette centralité se dissout. Chez Foucault, la puissance +devient capillaire, distribuée à travers des dispositifs, des normes, +des techniques de gouvernement qui opèrent sans centre unique ; chez +Deleuze et Guattari, elle se reformule comme flux désirants, comme +capacités de connexion et de transformation qui ne relèvent d'aucune +instance souveraine. -Cette redistribution se complexifie encore avec les approches contemporaines du technique. Chez Stiegler, la puissance se loge dans les dispositifs de capture et d’orientation de l’attention, dans les industries culturelles et numériques qui reconfigurent les conditions mêmes du désir ; chez Rouvroy et Berns, elle devient algorithmique, opérant par corrélation, anticipation et préemption, sans passer par la volonté ni même par la représentation. Dans ces configurations, la cratialité ne disparaît pas ; elle change de régime : d’une puissance qui impose, on passe à une puissance qui oriente, module, préempte, parfois au point de rendre difficile toute localisation du pouvoir. Ce déplacement ne signifie pas une disparition de la force, mais une transformation de ses modes d’existence, qui rend plus problématique encore son identification et sa contestation. +Cette redistribution se complexifie encore avec les approches +contemporaines du technique. Chez Stiegler, la puissance se loge dans +les dispositifs de capture et d'orientation de l'attention, dans les +industries culturelles et numériques qui reconfigurent les conditions +mêmes du désir ; chez Rouvroy et Berns, elle devient algorithmique, +opérant par corrélation, anticipation et préemption, sans passer par la +volonté ni même par la représentation. Dans ces configurations, la +cratialité ne disparaît pas ; elle change de régime : d'une puissance +qui impose, on passe à une puissance qui oriente, module, préempte, +parfois au point de rendre difficile toute localisation du pouvoir. Ce +déplacement ne signifie pas une disparition de la force, mais une +transformation de ses modes d'existence, qui rend plus problématique +encore son identification et sa contestation. -Une troisième ligne, enfin, concerne les modalités d’exposition et de mise à l’épreuve — ce que nous avons appelé archicration. C’est probablement sur ce point que les écarts se marquent avec le plus de netteté. Certaines configurations instituent explicitement des scènes de confrontation : chez Habermas, la délibération publique constitue le lieu où les normes peuvent être discutées et validées ; chez Rancière, le dissensus ouvre un espace où les partages du sensible peuvent être contestés ; chez Lefort, le pouvoir démocratique se caractérise précisément par l’impossibilité de s’incarner définitivement, laissant la place du pouvoir comme lieu vide, toujours exposé à la dispute. Arendt, de son côté, insiste sur la dimension d’apparition : le politique advient là où des individus se montrent, parlent et agissent ensemble dans un espace commun. +Une troisième ligne, enfin, concerne les modalités d'exposition et de +mise à l'épreuve — ce que nous avons appelé archicration. C'est +probablement sur ce point que les écarts se marquent avec le plus de +netteté. Certaines configurations instituent explicitement des scènes de +confrontation : chez Habermas, la délibération publique constitue le +lieu où les normes peuvent être discutées et validées ; chez Rancière, +le dissensus ouvre un espace où les partages du sensible peuvent être +contestés ; chez Lefort, le pouvoir démocratique se caractérise +précisément par l'impossibilité de s'incarner définitivement, laissant +la place du pouvoir comme lieu vide, toujours exposé à la dispute. +Arendt, de son côté, insiste sur la dimension d'apparition : le +politique advient là où des individus se montrent, parlent et agissent +ensemble dans un espace commun. -Mais cette scène peut aussi se réduire, se déplacer ou s’effacer. Chez Schmitt, elle se trouve suspendue dans l’exception ; chez Foucault, elle se fragmente en une multiplicité d’épreuves locales, souvent peu visibles ; chez les régimes contemporains analysés par Rouvroy et Berns, elle tend à être préemptée, les décisions étant prises en amont de toute délibération explicite. Même chez Deleuze et Guattari, où les agencements produisent des formes d’expérimentation, la scène ne se stabilise pas nécessairement comme lieu de confrontation explicite. L’archicration apparaît ainsi comme une dimension instable, toujours menacée : parfois surcodée par des institutions qui la figent, ailleurs dissoute dans des flux qui la rendent insaisissable, ou évacuée par des dispositifs qui la court-circuitent. +Mais cette scène peut aussi se réduire, se déplacer ou s'effacer. Chez +Schmitt, elle se trouve suspendue dans l'exception ; chez Foucault, elle +se fragmente en une multiplicité d'épreuves locales, souvent peu +visibles ; chez les régimes contemporains analysés par Rouvroy et Berns, +elle tend à être préemptée, les décisions étant prises en amont de toute +délibération explicite. Même chez Deleuze et Guattari, où les +agencements produisent des formes d'expérimentation, la scène ne se +stabilise pas nécessairement comme lieu de confrontation explicite. +L'archicration apparaît ainsi comme une dimension instable, toujours +menacée : parfois surcodée par des institutions qui la figent, ailleurs +dissoute dans des flux qui la rendent insaisissable, ou évacuée par des +dispositifs qui la court-circuitent. -Ces trois lignes — fondation, effectuation, exposition — ne définissent pas des domaines séparés, mais des dimensions en tension, dont les configurations étudiées offrent des combinaisons singulières. Certaines privilégient la fondation au détriment de l’exposition ; d’autres maximisent l’exposition tout en fragilisant l’effectuation ; d’autres encore déplacent l’effectuation vers des dispositifs techniques qui reconfigurent simultanément la fondation et la scène. Il s’agit ici de rendre sensibles ces déséquilibres constitutifs, sans lesquels aucune configuration ne devient pleinement intelligible. +Ces trois lignes — fondation, effectuation, exposition — ne +définissent pas des domaines séparés, mais des dimensions en tension, +dont les configurations étudiées offrent des combinaisons singulières. +Certaines privilégient la fondation au détriment de l'exposition ; +d'autres maximisent l'exposition tout en fragilisant l'effectuation ; +d'autres encore déplacent l'effectuation vers des dispositifs techniques +qui reconfigurent simultanément la fondation et la scène. Il s'agit ici +de rendre sensibles ces déséquilibres constitutifs, sans lesquels aucune +configuration ne devient pleinement intelligible. -Ce qui apparaît alors, de manière plus nette, c’est que la question de la co-viabilité ne peut être posée indépendamment de ces tensions. Un régime peut assurer une forte stabilité au prix d’une fermeture de la scène ; un autre peut ouvrir largement la possibilité du dissensus tout en peinant à produire des décisions effectives ; un autre encore peut optimiser les comportements sans produire de sens partagé. Il n’existe pas de configuration qui résolve une fois pour toutes ces tensions. Toute tentative en ce sens conduirait soit à la rigidification, soit à la dissolution. +Ce qui apparaît alors, de manière plus nette, c'est que la question de +la co-viabilité ne peut être posée indépendamment de ces tensions. Un +régime peut assurer une forte stabilité au prix d'une fermeture de la +scène ; un autre peut ouvrir largement la possibilité du dissensus tout +en peinant à produire des décisions effectives ; un autre encore peut +optimiser les comportements sans produire de sens partagé. Il n'existe +pas de configuration qui résolve une fois pour toutes ces tensions. +Toute tentative en ce sens conduirait soit à la rigidification, soit à +la dissolution. -C’est ici que la rigueur méthodologique doit être maintenue avec le plus de fermeté. Car la tentation serait grande de transformer ces lignes différentielles en critères d’évaluation, et d’ériger l’articulation entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration en norme implicite permettant de juger les régimes. Une telle dérive reconduirait exactement ce que l’analyse cherchait à éviter : la subsomption des pensées sous un cadre unique. Les lignes proposées ne valent donc pas comme normes ; elles servent à mettre les configurations en tension. Elles permettent de poser des questions — où se fonde l’ordre ? comment s’exerce la puissance ? où se joue l’épreuve ? — sans préjuger des réponses. +C'est ici que la rigueur méthodologique doit être maintenue avec le plus +de fermeté. Car la tentation serait grande de transformer ces lignes +différentielles en critères d'évaluation, et d'ériger l'articulation +entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration en norme implicite permettant +de juger les régimes. Une telle dérive reconduirait exactement ce que +l'analyse cherchait à éviter : la subsomption des pensées sous un cadre +unique. Les lignes proposées ne valent donc pas comme normes ; elles +servent à mettre les configurations en tension. Elles permettent de +poser des questions — où se fonde l'ordre ? comment s'exerce la +puissance ? où se joue l'épreuve ? — sans préjuger des réponses. -En retour, ces questions affectent l’hypothèse archicratique elle-même. Car si celle-ci prétend offrir un cadre de lisibilité des régimes de régulation, elle ne peut le faire qu’à la condition de ne pas s’ériger en principe surplombant. Elle doit accepter que certaines configurations excèdent ses catégories, que d’autres les déplacent, que d’autres encore les mettent en crise. La valeur de l’hypothèse ne réside pas dans sa capacité à tout intégrer, mais dans sa capacité à rester opératoire face à ce qui lui résiste. +En retour, ces questions affectent l'hypothèse archicratique elle-même. +Car si celle-ci prétend offrir un cadre de lisibilité des régimes de +régulation, elle ne peut le faire qu'à la condition de ne pas s'ériger +en principe surplombant. Elle doit accepter que certaines configurations +excèdent ses catégories, que d'autres les déplacent, que d'autres encore +les mettent en crise. La valeur de l'hypothèse ne réside pas dans sa +capacité à tout intégrer, mais dans sa capacité à rester opératoire face +à ce qui lui résiste. -Ainsi comprises, les lignes différentielles de la régulation ne constituent pas une typologie au sens fort, mais un espace minimal de repérage : un espace dans lequel des configurations peuvent être situées relativement les unes aux autres, non pour être classées, mais pour être mises en rapport. Cet espace n’est pas clos ; il est traversé par des tensions, ouvert à des transformations, susceptible d’être reconfiguré à mesure que de nouvelles formes de régulation apparaissent. +Ainsi comprises, les lignes différentielles de la régulation ne +constituent pas une typologie au sens fort, mais un espace minimal de +repérage : un espace dans lequel des configurations peuvent être situées +relativement les unes aux autres, non pour être classées, mais pour être +mises en rapport. Cet espace n'est pas clos ; il est traversé par des +tensions, ouvert à des transformations, susceptible d'être reconfiguré à +mesure que de nouvelles formes de régulation apparaissent. -C’est à partir de cette topologie que la suite pourra interroger plus précisément les formes de co-viabilité rendues possibles — ou impossibles — par les différentes configurations. Mais avant cela, il importe de maintenir ce point d’équilibre fragile : rendre comparables sans réduire, différencier sans hiérarchiser, et laisser les tensions apparaître sans chercher à les résoudre prématurément. +C'est à partir de cette topologie que la suite pourra interroger plus +précisément les formes de co-viabilité rendues possibles — ou +impossibles — par les différentes configurations. Mais avant cela, il +importe de maintenir ce point d'équilibre fragile : rendre comparables +sans réduire, différencier sans hiérarchiser, et laisser les tensions +apparaître sans chercher à les résoudre prématurément. -Une vue synoptique des auteurs, des modes de force, des formes d’héritage, des statuts de scène et des types de co-viabilité correspondants est proposée en annexe A. +Une vue synoptique des auteurs, des modes de force, des formes +d'héritage, des statuts de scène et des types de co-viabilité +correspondants est proposée en annexe A. ### **3.7.2 — Figures de co-viabilité et tensions constitutives** -Si les lignes différentielles dégagées précédemment permettent de situer les régimes régulateurs selon des variations de fondation, d’effectuation et d’exposition, leur portée ne se révèle pleinement qu’à partir d’une autre question, plus exigeante encore : celle des formes de co-viabilité que ces configurations rendent effectivement possibles. Décrire comment un ordre se fonde, comment une puissance s’exerce ou comment une scène s’ouvre ne suffit pas ; il faut encore comprendre ce que ces agencements permettent de soutenir, dans la durée, comme forme de vie commune. Or, sur ce point, aucune configuration ne peut être pensée indépendamment de la tension qui la constitue : ce qu’elle rend possible est inséparable de ce qu’elle tend simultanément à empêcher. +Si les lignes différentielles dégagées précédemment permettent de situer +les régimes régulateurs selon des variations de fondation, +d'effectuation et d'exposition, leur portée ne se révèle pleinement qu'à +partir d'une autre question, plus exigeante encore : celle des formes de +co-viabilité que ces configurations rendent effectivement possibles. +Décrire comment un ordre se fonde, comment une puissance s'exerce ou +comment une scène s'ouvre ne suffit pas ; il faut encore comprendre ce +que ces agencements permettent de soutenir, dans la durée, comme forme +de vie commune. Or, sur ce point, aucune configuration ne peut être +pensée indépendamment de la tension qui la constitue : ce qu'elle rend +possible est inséparable de ce qu'elle tend simultanément à empêcher. -Certaines configurations apparaissent d’abord comme maximisant la stabilité. Chez Hobbes, la centralisation de la contrainte produit une co-viabilité fondée sur la sûreté : ce qui est visé, avant tout, est la sortie de la guerre de tous contre tous, par la neutralisation des conflits internes. Une telle configuration permet effectivement de stabiliser un espace commun, en réduisant l’incertitude et en assurant l’exécution des décisions. Mais cette stabilité a un prix : la scène de contestation se trouve fortement réduite, et avec elle la possibilité d’une transformation interne du régime. La co-viabilité y est obtenue par pacification, mais au prix d’une fermeture qui rend plus difficile toute reprise collective de l’ordre institué. +Certaines configurations apparaissent d'abord comme maximisant la +stabilité. Chez Hobbes, la centralisation de la contrainte produit une +co-viabilité fondée sur la sûreté : ce qui est visé, avant tout, est la +sortie de la guerre de tous contre tous, par la neutralisation des +conflits internes. Une telle configuration permet effectivement de +stabiliser un espace commun, en réduisant l'incertitude et en assurant +l'exécution des décisions. Mais cette stabilité a un prix : la scène de +contestation se trouve fortement réduite, et avec elle la possibilité +d'une transformation interne du régime. La co-viabilité y est obtenue +par pacification, mais au prix d'une fermeture qui rend plus difficile +toute reprise collective de l'ordre institué. -Dans une autre configuration, comme celle que propose Rousseau, la co-viabilité ne repose plus sur la contrainte centralisée, mais sur l’intériorisation du commun. La volonté générale, en tant qu’elle exprime l’auto-législation d’un corps politique, vise une forme d’unité où chacun obéit à la loi qu’il s’est donnée. Ce modèle permet de penser une co-viabilité fondée sur l’adhésion et la participation, plutôt que sur la seule coercition. Mais là encore, la tension est manifeste : en faisant de la conformité à la volonté générale la condition de la liberté, il tend à disqualifier le dissensus, à le requalifier en erreur ou en déviation. Le gain de cohésion peut alors se payer d’une moindre capacité à accueillir la conflictualité. +Dans une autre configuration, comme celle que propose Rousseau, la +co-viabilité ne repose plus sur la contrainte centralisée, mais sur +l'intériorisation du commun. La volonté générale, en tant qu'elle +exprime l'auto-législation d'un corps politique, vise une forme d'unité +où chacun obéit à la loi qu'il s'est donnée. Ce modèle permet de penser +une co-viabilité fondée sur l'adhésion et la participation, plutôt que +sur la seule coercition. Mais là encore, la tension est manifeste : en +faisant de la conformité à la volonté générale la condition de la +liberté, il tend à disqualifier le dissensus, à le requalifier en erreur +ou en déviation. Le gain de cohésion peut alors se payer d'une moindre +capacité à accueillir la conflictualité. -Chez Weber, la co-viabilité prend une autre forme : celle de la prévisibilité procédurale. L’institution bureaucratique, en codifiant les règles, en stabilisant les fonctions et en assurant la continuité de l’action, permet de produire un ordre relativement fiable, où les décisions ne dépendent pas d’arbitraires personnels. Cette configuration rend possible une coordination à grande échelle, indispensable aux sociétés complexes. Mais elle introduit également une inertie : la règle tend à se reproduire elle-même, et la capacité de révision se trouve limitée par la rigidité des procédures. La co-viabilité est ici assurée par la formalisation, mais au risque d’une perte de plasticité. +Chez Weber, la co-viabilité prend une autre forme : celle de la +prévisibilité procédurale. L'institution bureaucratique, en codifiant +les règles, en stabilisant les fonctions et en assurant la continuité de +l'action, permet de produire un ordre relativement fiable, où les +décisions ne dépendent pas d'arbitraires personnels. Cette configuration +rend possible une coordination à grande échelle, indispensable aux +sociétés complexes. Mais elle introduit également une inertie : la règle +tend à se reproduire elle-même, et la capacité de révision se trouve +limitée par la rigidité des procédures. La co-viabilité est ici assurée +par la formalisation, mais au risque d'une perte de plasticité. -À l’opposé apparent de ces modèles, certaines configurations mettent l’accent sur l’ouverture de la scène. Chez Habermas, la co-viabilité repose sur la possibilité d’une délibération libre, où les normes peuvent être soumises à l’épreuve de l’argumentation. Chez Rancière, elle s’ancre dans la capacité des sans-part à faire irruption dans l’espace du visible, à contester les partages établis. Chez Lefort, elle dépend de la vacance du lieu du pouvoir, qui empêche toute appropriation définitive et maintient l’espace politique ouvert. Dans ces configurations, la co-viabilité ne se définit plus par la stabilité ou la conformité, mais par la capacité à maintenir une scène de contestation active. +À l'opposé apparent de ces modèles, certaines configurations mettent +l'accent sur l'ouverture de la scène. Chez Habermas, la co-viabilité +repose sur la possibilité d'une délibération libre, où les normes +peuvent être soumises à l'épreuve de l'argumentation. Chez Rancière, +elle s'ancre dans la capacité des sans-part à faire irruption dans +l'espace du visible, à contester les partages établis. Chez Lefort, elle +dépend de la vacance du lieu du pouvoir, qui empêche toute appropriation +définitive et maintient l'espace politique ouvert. Dans ces +configurations, la co-viabilité ne se définit plus par la stabilité ou +la conformité, mais par la capacité à maintenir une scène de +contestation active. -Cependant, cette ouverture n’est pas sans condition. La délibération habermassienne suppose des asymétries réduites, des ressources cognitives et temporelles disponibles, des institutions capables d’accueillir la parole ; le dissensus ranciérien, pour être effectif, nécessite des conditions d’apparition qui ne sont pas toujours réunies. La scène peut alors devenir formelle, voire illusoire, si les conditions matérielles de son effectivité ne sont pas assurées. La co-viabilité, dans ces configurations, est pensée comme possibilité d’être discuté publiquement, mais elle peut se heurter à des limites pratiques qui en restreignent la portée. +Cependant, cette ouverture n'est pas sans condition. La délibération +habermassienne suppose des asymétries réduites, des ressources +cognitives et temporelles disponibles, des institutions capables +d'accueillir la parole ; le dissensus ranciérien, pour être effectif, +nécessite des conditions d'apparition qui ne sont pas toujours réunies. +La scène peut alors devenir formelle, voire illusoire, si les conditions +matérielles de son effectivité ne sont pas assurées. La co-viabilité, +dans ces configurations, est pensée comme possibilité d'être discuté +publiquement, mais elle peut se heurter à des limites pratiques qui en +restreignent la portée. -D’autres approches déplacent encore la question. Chez Ostrom, la co-viabilité se construit dans des dispositifs locaux de gestion des communs, où les règles sont élaborées et ajustées par les acteurs eux-mêmes. Ce modèle montre qu’il est possible de maintenir des ressources partagées sans passer par une centralisation étatique ni par une pure logique de marché. Il met en évidence l’importance du suivi mutuel, des sanctions graduées et de l’ancrage dans des contextes spécifiques. Mais cette réussite locale rencontre une limite propre : dès lors qu’il faut articuler plusieurs systèmes de règles, affronter des interdépendances plus vastes ou changer d’échelle, la robustesse acquise dans la proximité ne se transpose pas sans reste. La co-viabilité y est forte, mais située. +D'autres approches déplacent encore la question. Chez Ostrom, la +co-viabilité se construit dans des dispositifs locaux de gestion des +communs, où les règles sont élaborées et ajustées par les acteurs +eux-mêmes. Ce modèle montre qu'il est possible de maintenir des +ressources partagées sans passer par une centralisation étatique ni par +une pure logique de marché. Il met en évidence l'importance du suivi +mutuel, des sanctions graduées et de l'ancrage dans des contextes +spécifiques. Mais cette réussite locale rencontre une limite propre : +dès lors qu'il faut articuler plusieurs systèmes de règles, affronter +des interdépendances plus vastes ou changer d'échelle, la robustesse +acquise dans la proximité ne se transpose pas sans reste. La +co-viabilité y est forte, mais située. -Dans une tout autre direction, les pensées de Deleuze et Guattari proposent une conception de la co-viabilité comme processus de création et de recomposition permanente. Les agencements permettent de produire des formes de vie nouvelles, de déterritorialiser des structures figées, de faire émerger des lignes de fuite. Cette dynamique ouvre des possibilités inédites, en refusant toute fixation définitive. Mais elle reconduit aussitôt la question de la tenue : l’invention laisse-t-elle autre chose qu’une intensité passagère ? la transformation dépose-t-elle des formes assez stables pour pouvoir être reprises ? La co-viabilité y est inventive, mais souvent précaire, exposée au risque d’évanescence. +Dans une tout autre direction, les pensées de Deleuze et Guattari +proposent une conception de la co-viabilité comme processus de création +et de recomposition permanente. Les agencements permettent de produire +des formes de vie nouvelles, de déterritorialiser des structures figées, +de faire émerger des lignes de fuite. Cette dynamique ouvre des +possibilités inédites, en refusant toute fixation définitive. Mais elle +reconduit aussitôt la question de la tenue : l'invention laisse-t-elle +autre chose qu'une intensité passagère ? la transformation dépose-t-elle +des formes assez stables pour pouvoir être reprises ? La co-viabilité y +est inventive, mais souvent précaire, exposée au risque d'évanescence. -Avec Stiegler, la question se reformule autour du temps et de l’attention. La co-viabilité dépend de la capacité des collectifs à maintenir des régimes de temporalité qui permettent la transmission, la réflexion, la projection. La désynchronisation produite par les dispositifs techniques contemporains menace cette capacité, en accélérant les flux et en captant l’attention. La régulation devient alors un travail de soin, visant à restaurer des processus d’individuation collective. Cette approche met en lumière une dimension essentielle : sans temporalité partagée, aucune co-viabilité durable n’est possible. Mais elle se heurte à une difficulté d’institutionnalisation : comment inscrire ce soin dans des dispositifs stables sans le transformer en nouvelle forme de contrôle ? +Avec Stiegler, la question se reformule autour du temps et de +l'attention. La co-viabilité dépend de la capacité des collectifs à +maintenir des régimes de temporalité qui permettent la transmission, la +réflexion, la projection. La désynchronisation produite par les +dispositifs techniques contemporains menace cette capacité, en +accélérant les flux et en captant l'attention. La régulation devient +alors un travail de soin, visant à restaurer des processus +d'individuation collective. Cette approche met en lumière une dimension +essentielle : sans temporalité partagée, aucune co-viabilité durable +n'est possible. Mais elle se heurte à une difficulté +d'institutionnalisation : comment inscrire ce soin dans des dispositifs +stables sans le transformer en nouvelle forme de contrôle ? -Enfin, les analyses de Rouvroy et Berns conduisent à envisager une configuration où la co-viabilité semble assurée par l’optimisation des comportements eux-mêmes. Les dispositifs algorithmiques permettent d’ajuster en continu les conduites, de prévenir les risques, de fluidifier les interactions. Tout se passe comme si le problème de la coordination était résolu en amont, par la préemption des écarts. Mais cette apparente efficacité masque une transformation profonde : la co-viabilité n’est plus élaborée collectivement, elle est calculée. Elle ne repose plus sur une scène partagée, mais sur des corrélations statistiques. Ce qui est perdu, alors, ce n’est pas seulement la conflictualité, mais la possibilité même de se rapporter à un commun comme tel. +Enfin, les analyses de Rouvroy et Berns conduisent à envisager une +configuration où la co-viabilité semble assurée par l'optimisation des +comportements eux-mêmes. Les dispositifs algorithmiques permettent +d'ajuster en continu les conduites, de prévenir les risques, de +fluidifier les interactions. Tout se passe comme si le problème de la +coordination était résolu en amont, par la préemption des écarts. Mais +cette apparente efficacité masque une transformation profonde : la +co-viabilité n'est plus élaborée collectivement, elle est calculée. Elle +ne repose plus sur une scène partagée, mais sur des corrélations +statistiques. Ce qui est perdu, alors, ce n'est pas seulement la +conflictualité, mais la possibilité même de se rapporter à un commun +comme tel. -À travers ces configurations, une constante se dégage : chaque forme de co-viabilité repose sur une tension spécifique entre ce qu’elle permet et ce qu’elle exclut. Aucune ne réalise une synthèse complète des dimensions en jeu. La stabilité peut se payer d’une fermeture ; l’ouverture, d’une inefficacité ; la distribution, d’une difficulté de coordination ; l’optimisation, d’une perte de sens partagé. Ces tensions ne sont pas des défauts accidentels ; elles sont constitutives des régimes eux-mêmes. +À travers ces configurations, une constante se dégage : chaque forme de +co-viabilité repose sur une tension spécifique entre ce qu'elle permet +et ce qu'elle exclut. Aucune ne réalise une synthèse complète des +dimensions en jeu. La stabilité peut se payer d'une fermeture ; +l'ouverture, d'une inefficacité ; la distribution, d'une difficulté de +coordination ; l'optimisation, d'une perte de sens partagé. Ces tensions +ne sont pas des défauts accidentels ; elles sont constitutives des +régimes eux-mêmes. -C’est pourquoi il serait trompeur de chercher à identifier une configuration qui réaliserait un équilibre idéal. Une telle configuration supposerait la résolution des tensions, c’est-à-dire leur disparition, ce qui reviendrait à neutraliser ce qui fait précisément la dynamique des régimes régulateurs. La co-viabilité doit être pensée comme une tenue sous tension : une capacité à maintenir ensemble des dimensions hétérogènes sans les réduire les unes aux autres. +C'est pourquoi il serait trompeur de chercher à identifier une +configuration qui réaliserait un équilibre idéal. Une telle +configuration supposerait la résolution des tensions, c'est-à-dire leur +disparition, ce qui reviendrait à neutraliser ce qui fait précisément la +dynamique des régimes régulateurs. La co-viabilité doit être pensée +comme une tenue sous tension : une capacité à maintenir ensemble des +dimensions hétérogènes sans les réduire les unes aux autres. -Le regard se déplace alors : la question n’est plus de savoir quel régime serait le meilleur, mais comment un régime tient, et à quel prix. Quelles dimensions privilégie-t-il ? lesquelles sacrifie-t-il ? Quelles formes de conflictualité permet-il encore ? Quelles possibilités de transformation laisse-t-il ouvertes ? Ces questions ne visent pas à juger de l’extérieur, mais à rendre visible l’économie interne des configurations. +Le regard se déplace alors : la question n'est plus de savoir quel +régime serait le meilleur, mais comment un régime tient, et à quel prix. +Quelles dimensions privilégie-t-il ? lesquelles sacrifie-t-il ? Quelles +formes de conflictualité permet-il encore ? Quelles possibilités de +transformation laisse-t-il ouvertes ? Ces questions ne visent pas à +juger de l'extérieur, mais à rendre visible l'économie interne des +configurations. -En retour, elles affectent la manière dont peut être comprise l’hypothèse archicratique. Si celle-ci ne doit pas devenir un modèle normatif, elle ne peut se contenter de décrire des tensions ; elle doit permettre de les penser comme telles, c’est-à-dire de les maintenir ouvertes sans chercher à les résoudre. Sa fonction n’est pas d’indiquer un équilibre à atteindre, mais de rendre perceptible ce qui, dans chaque configuration, fait travailler la relation entre fondation, puissance et scène. +En retour, elles affectent la manière dont peut être comprise +l'hypothèse archicratique. Si celle-ci ne doit pas devenir un modèle +normatif, elle ne peut se contenter de décrire des tensions ; elle doit +permettre de les penser comme telles, c'est-à-dire de les maintenir +ouvertes sans chercher à les résoudre. Sa fonction n'est pas d'indiquer +un équilibre à atteindre, mais de rendre perceptible ce qui, dans chaque +configuration, fait travailler la relation entre fondation, puissance et +scène. -Ainsi, les figures de co-viabilité qui se dessinent ici ne doivent pas être comprises comme des modèles à reproduire, mais comme des configurations à interroger. Elles offrent des prises, des points d’appui pour penser des situations concrètes, mais elles exigent toujours d’être réinscrites dans des contextes spécifiques. Leur valeur n’est pas universelle ; elle est située, dépendante des conditions dans lesquelles elles opèrent. +Ainsi, les figures de co-viabilité qui se dessinent ici ne doivent pas +être comprises comme des modèles à reproduire, mais comme des +configurations à interroger. Elles offrent des prises, des points +d'appui pour penser des situations concrètes, mais elles exigent +toujours d'être réinscrites dans des contextes spécifiques. Leur valeur +n'est pas universelle ; elle est située, dépendante des conditions dans +lesquelles elles opèrent. -Ce qui se joue alors, à travers cette analyse, ce n’est pas la possibilité d’une synthèse définitive, mais l’ouverture d’un espace de discernement. Un espace où il devient possible de reconnaître les formes de co-viabilité à l’œuvre, d’en saisir les tensions, et d’en mesurer les limites sans les absolutiser. C’est dans cet espace que pourra être interrogée, dans la section suivante, la manière dont ces configurations se déséquilibrent, se saturent ou basculent, lorsque les tensions qu’elles portent ne sont plus tenues mais absorbées. +Ce qui se joue alors, à travers cette analyse, ce n'est pas la +possibilité d'une synthèse définitive, mais l'ouverture d'un espace de +discernement. Un espace où il devient possible de reconnaître les formes +de co-viabilité à l'œuvre, d'en saisir les tensions, et d'en mesurer les +limites sans les absolutiser. C'est dans cet espace que pourra être +interrogée, dans la section suivante, la manière dont ces configurations +se déséquilibrent, se saturent ou basculent, lorsque les tensions +qu'elles portent ne sont plus tenues mais absorbées. -Les principales configurations d’apports régulateurs, d’angles morts et de contre-prises associées sont regroupées sous forme comparative en annexe B. +Les principales configurations d'apports régulateurs, d'angles morts et +de contre-prises associées sont regroupées sous forme comparative en +annexe B. ### **3.7.3 — Déséquilibres critiques et seuils de bascule** -Aucune configuration régulatrice n’est à l’abri de sa propre dérive. Ce n’est ni qu’elle serait secrètement vouée à l’échec, ni que toute tentative d’institution devrait fatalement se retourner contre elle-même ; c’est qu’aucun régime de co-viabilité ne peut demeurer vivant s’il absolutise l’un des pôles qui le rendent possible. Dès qu’une forme de puissance s’autonomise sans reprise, dès qu’un héritage se fige en évidence indisponible, dès qu’une scène de mise à l’épreuve se vide de toute prise réelle ou, à l’inverse, se dissout dans une ouverture sans consistance, la régulation cesse de composer les tensions et commence à les neutraliser, à les moraliser, à les préempter ou à les disperser. C’est à partir de là qu’apparaissent des seuils de bascule : des points critiques où une configuration commence à perdre sa capacité de co-viabilité, parce qu’un de ses principes se rigidifie, s’autonomise ou absorbe les autres au lieu de demeurer pris dans une tension réglée. +Aucune configuration régulatrice n'est à l'abri de sa propre dérive. Ce +n'est ni qu'elle serait secrètement vouée à l'échec, ni que toute +tentative d'institution devrait fatalement se retourner contre elle-même +; c'est qu'aucun régime de co-viabilité ne peut demeurer vivant s'il +absolutise l'un des pôles qui le rendent possible. Dès qu'une forme de +puissance s'autonomise sans reprise, dès qu'un héritage se fige en +évidence indisponible, dès qu'une scène de mise à l'épreuve se vide de +toute prise réelle ou, à l'inverse, se dissout dans une ouverture sans +consistance, la régulation cesse de composer les tensions et commence à +les neutraliser, à les moraliser, à les préempter ou à les disperser. +C'est à partir de là qu'apparaissent des seuils de bascule : des points +critiques où une configuration commence à perdre sa capacité de +co-viabilité, parce qu'un de ses principes se rigidifie, s'autonomise ou +absorbe les autres au lieu de demeurer pris dans une tension réglée. -L’intérêt d’une telle approche est de permettre une description interne des dérives. Elle permet d’éviter deux erreurs symétriques. La première consisterait à croire qu’un régime devient critiquable seulement lorsqu’il produit des effets ouvertement destructeurs ; or les bascules les plus graves commencent presque toujours par des gains réels devenus exclusifs. La seconde reviendrait à traiter toutes les dérives comme équivalentes, alors qu’elles procèdent de déséquilibres distincts, exigeant des reprises différentes. Il ne s’agit donc pas uniquement d’identifier des fragilités générales, mais aussi de décrire des morphologies de désajustement, c’est-à-dire des manières spécifiques pour une configuration de perdre sa capacité de co-viabilité. Ce que montre alors l’analyse, c’est qu’une régulation ne s’effondre pas d’un seul coup : elle se dérègle par saturation, lorsqu’un principe utile devient principe unique, lorsqu’une fonction nécessaire prétend valoir pour le tout, lorsqu’un gain local absorbe la structure entière. +L'intérêt d'une telle approche est de permettre une description interne +des dérives. Elle permet d'éviter deux erreurs symétriques. La première +consisterait à croire qu'un régime devient critiquable seulement +lorsqu'il produit des effets ouvertement destructeurs ; or les bascules +les plus graves commencent presque toujours par des gains réels devenus +exclusifs. La seconde reviendrait à traiter toutes les dérives comme +équivalentes, alors qu'elles procèdent de déséquilibres distincts, +exigeant des reprises différentes. Il ne s'agit donc pas uniquement +d'identifier des fragilités générales, mais aussi de décrire des +morphologies de désajustement, c'est-à-dire des manières spécifiques +pour une configuration de perdre sa capacité de co-viabilité. Ce que +montre alors l'analyse, c'est qu'une régulation ne s'effondre pas d'un +seul coup : elle se dérègle par saturation, lorsqu'un principe utile +devient principe unique, lorsqu'une fonction nécessaire prétend valoir +pour le tout, lorsqu'un gain local absorbe la structure entière. -Un premier seuil critique apparaît lorsque la puissance d’exécution se sépare de toute scène de reprise et se referme sur sa propre nécessité. Nous avons rencontré cette tentation chez les penseurs de la centralisation de la contrainte, de la décision souveraine ou de l’office rationalisé : Hobbes, Schmitt, certains usages wébériens de la procédure. Dans tous ces cas, un gain essentiel est préservé : la capacité d’arrêter l’indétermination, de soutenir un ordre opératoire, et d’empêcher qu’une conflictualité sans forme n’emporte le monde commun. Mais cette capacité devient destructrice lorsqu’elle ne se laisse plus affecter par ce qu’elle régule. Le seuil de bascule se situe alors dans ce que l’on pourrait nommer l’*empêchement* : non la simple autorité, mais l’exécution devenue telle qu’elle interdit la remontée des objections, bloque la reformulation des règles et transforme la scène politique en simple espace d’application. La puissance ne se contente plus d’opérer ; elle empêche que son propre exercice devienne matière à épreuve. La fermeture n’est donc pas seulement juridique ou institutionnelle ; elle est morphologique. Une configuration bascule dans l’empêchement lorsqu’elle ne connaît plus que la question du maintien, et plus celle de la révision. +Un premier seuil critique apparaît lorsque la puissance d'exécution se +sépare de toute scène de reprise et se referme sur sa propre nécessité. +Nous avons rencontré cette tentation chez les penseurs de la +centralisation de la contrainte, de la décision souveraine ou de +l'office rationalisé : Hobbes, Schmitt, certains usages wébériens de la +procédure. Dans tous ces cas, un gain essentiel est préservé : la +capacité d'arrêter l'indétermination, de soutenir un ordre opératoire, +et d'empêcher qu'une conflictualité sans forme n'emporte le monde +commun. Mais cette capacité devient destructrice lorsqu'elle ne se +laisse plus affecter par ce qu'elle régule. Le seuil de bascule se situe +alors dans ce que l'on pourrait nommer l'*empêchement* : non la simple +autorité, mais l'exécution devenue telle qu'elle interdit la remontée +des objections, bloque la reformulation des règles et transforme la +scène politique en simple espace d'application. La puissance ne se +contente plus d'opérer ; elle empêche que son propre exercice devienne +matière à épreuve. La fermeture n'est donc pas seulement juridique ou +institutionnelle ; elle est morphologique. Une configuration bascule +dans l'empêchement lorsqu'elle ne connaît plus que la question du +maintien, et plus celle de la révision. -Un deuxième seuil se dessine lorsque l’héritage, au lieu de servir d’appui à l’instauration, se transforme en norme morale saturante. Cette dérive apparaît chaque fois que l’héritage civique, éthique ou symbolique cesse d’être un appui interprétable pour devenir une évidence normative indisponible. On peut en repérer une possibilité dans certaines lectures durcies de Rousseau, mais aussi, plus largement, dans tous les régimes où l’arcalité se présente comme fidélité obligatoire à un commun supposé aller de soi. Là encore, le point de départ n’est pas illégitime : aucune société ne tient sans mémoire, sans mœurs, sans formes d’intériorisation du commun. Mais la bascule survient lorsque cette mémoire cesse d’être interprétable et devient critère de distinction entre ceux qui appartiennent pleinement à la scène et ceux qui ne feraient qu’en perturber l’ordre. Le désaccord n’est plus alors affronté comme tension interne au commun, mais discrédité comme défaut de vertu, de loyauté ou d’adhésion. Nous nommerons ce seuil la *moralisation*. Il ne détruit pas la scène par la force, mais par disqualification préalable des voix qui devraient pourtant y comparaître. La régulation s’y fige en évidence morale ; elle n’a plus à réfuter, puisqu’elle commence par distribuer les places de la recevabilité. Ce n’est plus le conflit qui devient moteur de transformation, mais la conformité à un bien présumé qui distribue d’avance la recevabilité des paroles. +Un deuxième seuil se dessine lorsque l'héritage, au lieu de servir +d'appui à l'instauration, se transforme en norme morale saturante. Cette +dérive apparaît chaque fois que l'héritage civique, éthique ou +symbolique cesse d'être un appui interprétable pour devenir une évidence +normative indisponible. On peut en repérer une possibilité dans +certaines lectures durcies de Rousseau, mais aussi, plus largement, dans +tous les régimes où l'arcalité se présente comme fidélité obligatoire à +un commun supposé aller de soi. Là encore, le point de départ n'est pas +illégitime : aucune société ne tient sans mémoire, sans mœurs, sans +formes d'intériorisation du commun. Mais la bascule survient lorsque +cette mémoire cesse d'être interprétable et devient critère de +distinction entre ceux qui appartiennent pleinement à la scène et ceux +qui ne feraient qu'en perturber l'ordre. Le désaccord n'est plus alors +affronté comme tension interne au commun, mais discrédité comme défaut +de vertu, de loyauté ou d'adhésion. Nous nommerons ce seuil la +*moralisation*. Il ne détruit pas la scène par la force, mais par +disqualification préalable des voix qui devraient pourtant y +comparaître. La régulation s'y fige en évidence morale ; elle n'a plus à +réfuter, puisqu'elle commence par distribuer les places de la +recevabilité. Ce n'est plus le conflit qui devient moteur de +transformation, mais la conformité à un bien présumé qui distribue +d'avance la recevabilité des paroles. -Un troisième seuil de bascule concerne les régimes où la régulation tend à prévenir l’écart avant même qu’il n’apparaisse. Ce seuil a trouvé sa formulation la plus aiguë dans l’étude des dispositifs normatifs capillaires et, plus encore, dans la gouvernementalité algorithmique. Ici, la scène n’est pas frontalement fermée, ni moralement saturée : elle est court-circuitée. Les conduites sont orientées en amont, les marges sont réduites par profilage, les possibilités de désaccord sont traitées comme variations à corriger avant de devenir événements. Nous appellerons cette figure la *préemption*. Elle constitue sans doute l’une des formes les plus redoutables de déséquilibre contemporain, parce qu’elle n’a pas besoin de se déclarer comme domination. Elle agit par configuration des possibles, par seuils, classements, paramétrages, corrélations. Elle ne dit pas non ; elle rend de moins en moins praticable ce à quoi elle n’aurait pas déjà ménagé une place. Dans un tel régime, l’arcalité se dissout dans la discrétion des architectures, la cratialité s’absorbe dans la réduction du bruit, et l’archicration devient presque impossible, faute d’un moment où l’écart puisse se rendre visible comme tel. La co-viabilité y survit peut-être sous la forme d’une compatibilité fonctionnelle minimale, mais elle cesse d’être une élaboration partageable du commun. +Un troisième seuil de bascule concerne les régimes où la régulation tend +à prévenir l'écart avant même qu'il n'apparaisse. Ce seuil a trouvé sa +formulation la plus aiguë dans l'étude des dispositifs normatifs +capillaires et, plus encore, dans la gouvernementalité algorithmique. +Ici, la scène n'est pas frontalement fermée, ni moralement saturée : +elle est court-circuitée. Les conduites sont orientées en amont, les +marges sont réduites par profilage, les possibilités de désaccord sont +traitées comme variations à corriger avant de devenir événements. Nous +appellerons cette figure la *préemption*. Elle constitue sans doute +l'une des formes les plus redoutables de déséquilibre contemporain, +parce qu'elle n'a pas besoin de se déclarer comme domination. Elle agit +par configuration des possibles, par seuils, classements, paramétrages, +corrélations. Elle ne dit pas non ; elle rend de moins en moins +praticable ce à quoi elle n'aurait pas déjà ménagé une place. Dans un +tel régime, l'arcalité se dissout dans la discrétion des architectures, +la cratialité s'absorbe dans la réduction du bruit, et l'archicration +devient presque impossible, faute d'un moment où l'écart puisse se +rendre visible comme tel. La co-viabilité y survit peut-être sous la +forme d'une compatibilité fonctionnelle minimale, mais elle cesse d'être +une élaboration partageable du commun. -Un quatrième seuil, inverse et tout aussi structurant, apparaît lorsque la scène existe, lorsque les tentatives prolifèrent, lorsque les prises se multiplient, mais sans mémoire, sans stabilisation sélective, sans possibilité de transmission ni de reprise. Nous avons touché cette difficulté en examinant les pensées de l’agencement, de l’expérimentation et des lignes de fuite. Leur force est immense : elles défont les clôtures, rouvrent des devenirs, inventent des formes inédites. Pourtant, lorsqu’aucune trace ne se consolide, lorsqu’aucune forme n’est suffisamment retenue pour devenir matière à apprentissage collectif, la scène se dissipe dans l’*évanescence*. Tout peut être tenté, mais rien ne dure assez pour devenir règle révisable, repère transmissible ou mémoire active. Le seuil critique n’est plus ici celui de la fermeture, mais celui de la dispersion. La créativité, si elle n’est accompagnée ni d’une forme de sélection, ni d’un archivage interprétable, ni d’une reprise instituante, cesse de nourrir la co-viabilité et se condamne à l’intensité sans lendemain. La régulation se réduit alors à une succession d’essais sans sédimentation, et l’archicration, au lieu d’ouvrir une scène habitable, se consume dans l’instant de son apparition. +Un quatrième seuil, inverse et tout aussi structurant, apparaît lorsque +la scène existe, lorsque les tentatives prolifèrent, lorsque les prises +se multiplient, mais sans mémoire, sans stabilisation sélective, sans +possibilité de transmission ni de reprise. Nous avons touché cette +difficulté en examinant les pensées de l'agencement, de +l'expérimentation et des lignes de fuite. Leur force est immense : elles +défont les clôtures, rouvrent des devenirs, inventent des formes +inédites. Pourtant, lorsqu'aucune trace ne se consolide, lorsqu'aucune +forme n'est suffisamment retenue pour devenir matière à apprentissage +collectif, la scène se dissipe dans l'*évanescence*. Tout peut être +tenté, mais rien ne dure assez pour devenir règle révisable, repère +transmissible ou mémoire active. Le seuil critique n'est plus ici celui +de la fermeture, mais celui de la dispersion. La créativité, si elle +n'est accompagnée ni d'une forme de sélection, ni d'un archivage +interprétable, ni d'une reprise instituante, cesse de nourrir la +co-viabilité et se condamne à l'intensité sans lendemain. La régulation +se réduit alors à une succession d'essais sans sédimentation, et +l'archicration, au lieu d'ouvrir une scène habitable, se consume dans +l'instant de son apparition. -Ces quatre figures — *empêchement, moralisation, préemption, évanescence* — ne doivent pas être comprises comme des catégories closes ni comme des types purs. Elles nomment des dynamiques de déséquilibre, des manières récurrentes pour une configuration de perdre sa capacité à tenir ensemble héritage, force et scène. Elles ont surtout pour intérêt de rendre possible un diagnostic plus fin. Car une configuration régulatrice n’est jamais seulement à décrire selon ce qu’elle affirme ; elle doit être évaluée selon la manière dont elle risque de basculer. La question n’est donc pas seulement de savoir quel principe domine une configuration donnée ; elle consiste à discerner l’excès qui la menace : le point où la scène se referme, où la mémoire se sacralise, où la technique court-circuite l’épreuve, ou encore où l’invention se dissipe faute d’avoir trouvé une forme transmissible. +Ces quatre figures — *empêchement, moralisation, préemption, +évanescence* — ne doivent pas être comprises comme des catégories +closes ni comme des types purs. Elles nomment des dynamiques de +déséquilibre, des manières récurrentes pour une configuration de perdre +sa capacité à tenir ensemble héritage, force et scène. Elles ont surtout +pour intérêt de rendre possible un diagnostic plus fin. Car une +configuration régulatrice n'est jamais seulement à décrire selon ce +qu'elle affirme ; elle doit être évaluée selon la manière dont elle +risque de basculer. La question n'est donc pas seulement de savoir quel +principe domine une configuration donnée ; elle consiste à discerner +l'excès qui la menace : le point où la scène se referme, où la mémoire +se sacralise, où la technique court-circuite l'épreuve, ou encore où +l'invention se dissipe faute d'avoir trouvé une forme transmissible. -C’est ici que le travail archicratique commence au sens fort. Car il ne suffit pas d’identifier une dérive ; encore faut-il lui opposer une contre-prise adéquate. À l’*empêchement*, il faut des scènes de justification, de recours et de révision. À la *moralisation*, il faut des procédures capables de protéger le dissensus contre sa disqualification éthique. À la *préemption*, il faut des formes de publicité, d’audit, de contradiction et d’appel qui redonnent prise sur les architectures silencieuses. À l’*évanescence*, il faut des mémoires sélectives, des seuils de stabilisation, des formes de transmission qui permettent à l’expérimentation de laisser autre chose qu’une trace affective. Une configuration viable n’est donc pas celle qui élimine ces risques ; c’est celle qui se sait exposée à eux et se dote des médiations capables d’en limiter la montée en puissance. +C'est ici que le travail archicratique commence au sens fort. Car il ne +suffit pas d'identifier une dérive ; encore faut-il lui opposer une +contre-prise adéquate. À l'*empêchement*, il faut des scènes de +justification, de recours et de révision. À la *moralisation*, il faut +des procédures capables de protéger le dissensus contre sa +disqualification éthique. À la *préemption*, il faut des formes de +publicité, d'audit, de contradiction et d'appel qui redonnent prise sur +les architectures silencieuses. À l'*évanescence*, il faut des mémoires +sélectives, des seuils de stabilisation, des formes de transmission qui +permettent à l'expérimentation de laisser autre chose qu'une trace +affective. Une configuration viable n'est donc pas celle qui élimine ces +risques ; c'est celle qui se sait exposée à eux et se dote des +médiations capables d'en limiter la montée en puissance. -Ainsi compris, le seuil de bascule n’est pas seulement un instrument critique ; il devient un *principe opératoire de composition*. Il rappelle qu’aucune vertu régulatrice ne vaut par elle-même, qu’aucune scène n’est habitable si elle n’est pas soutenue par des formes, qu’aucune force n’est légitime si elle échappe à la reprise, qu’aucun héritage n’est vivant s’il interdit d’être repris autrement. Toute la tâche de l’archicratie tient alors dans cette *discipline de vigilance* : repérer l’excès avant qu’il ne se naturalise, reconnaître la dérive avant qu’elle ne devienne évidence, et maintenir ouverte la possibilité d’une contre-composition. Car la co-viabilité ne dépend jamais de la pureté d’un principe, mais de la qualité des tensions qu’un régime accepte de rendre visibles, disputables et transformables. C’est à cette condition seulement qu’une configuration cesse d’être une mécanique de domination ou une pure prolifération, pour devenir une forme habitable de monde commun. +Ainsi compris, le seuil de bascule n'est pas seulement un instrument +critique ; il devient un *principe opératoire de composition*. Il +rappelle qu'aucune vertu régulatrice ne vaut par elle-même, qu'aucune +scène n'est habitable si elle n'est pas soutenue par des formes, +qu'aucune force n'est légitime si elle échappe à la reprise, qu'aucun +héritage n'est vivant s'il interdit d'être repris autrement. Toute la +tâche de l'archicratie tient alors dans cette *discipline de vigilance* +: repérer l'excès avant qu'il ne se naturalise, reconnaître la dérive +avant qu'elle ne devienne évidence, et maintenir ouverte la possibilité +d'une contre-composition. Car la co-viabilité ne dépend jamais de la +pureté d'un principe, mais de la qualité des tensions qu'un régime +accepte de rendre visibles, disputables et transformables. C'est à cette +condition seulement qu'une configuration cesse d'être une mécanique de +domination ou une pure prolifération, pour devenir une forme habitable +de monde commun. -Une présentation condensée des compositions possibles, des risques de dérive et des indicateurs de vigilance correspondants figure en annexe C. +Une présentation condensée des compositions possibles, des risques de +dérive et des indicateurs de vigilance correspondants figure en annexe +C. ### **3.7.4 — Lectures transversales par familles philosophiques : cohérences internes, angles morts et principes de composition** -À ce stade du chapitre, la comparaison ne peut plus rester additive. Tant que les auteurs sont lus l’un après l’autre, leurs différences apparaissent ; ce qui se dérobe encore, en revanche, c’est la logique de leurs rapprochements partiels, de leurs affinités de structure et de leurs vulnérabilités homologues. Il faut donc changer de plan : non plus seulement suivre des œuvres singulières, mais faire apparaître les familles de pensée dans lesquelles certaines fonctions régulatrices se renforcent, se compensent ou se contrarient mutuellement. +À ce stade du chapitre, la comparaison ne peut plus rester additive. +Tant que les auteurs sont lus l'un après l'autre, leurs différences +apparaissent ; ce qui se dérobe encore, en revanche, c'est la logique de +leurs rapprochements partiels, de leurs affinités de structure et de +leurs vulnérabilités homologues. Il faut donc changer de plan : non plus +seulement suivre des œuvres singulières, mais faire apparaître les +familles de pensée dans lesquelles certaines fonctions régulatrices se +renforcent, se compensent ou se contrarient mutuellement. -Il ne s’agit pas d’assigner définitivement chaque auteur à une case, ni de produire une taxinomie close des doctrines politiques, mais de dégager des proximités morphologiques, des cohérences de geste, des vulnérabilités récurrentes et, surtout, des possibilités de composition. Car ce que le chapitre a progressivement rendu visible, ce n’est pas seulement la pluralité des régimes régulateurs ; c’est le fait que cette pluralité s’organise en constellations relativement cohérentes, où certaines fonctions sont privilégiées, certaines scènes favorisées, certaines médiations sacrifiées. +Il ne s'agit pas d'assigner définitivement chaque auteur à une case, ni +de produire une taxinomie close des doctrines politiques, mais de +dégager des proximités morphologiques, des cohérences de geste, des +vulnérabilités récurrentes et, surtout, des possibilités de composition. +Car ce que le chapitre a progressivement rendu visible, ce n'est pas +seulement la pluralité des régimes régulateurs ; c'est le fait que cette +pluralité s'organise en constellations relativement cohérentes, où +certaines fonctions sont privilégiées, certaines scènes favorisées, +certaines médiations sacrifiées. -Une première famille regroupe les pensées pour lesquelles la question centrale est celle de *l’exécution de l’ordre*. Chez Hobbes, chez Schmitt, et sous une forme très différente chez Weber, ce qui importe avant tout est qu’un monde ne soit pas livré à l’indétermination. La régulation y vaut d’abord par sa capacité à faire tenir, à trancher, à décider, à garantir une continuité opératoire face à la dispersion des volontés, à la conflictualité des intérêts ou à la menace de désagrégation. Bien sûr, les écarts entre ces auteurs sont considérables. Hobbes pense la sortie de la guerre civile par la concentration de la puissance ; Schmitt fait de la décision d’exception le cœur irréductible du politique ; Weber, quant à lui, analyse la stabilisation rationnelle de l’ordre à travers la forme bureaucratique et la légalité procédurale. Pourtant, malgré ces différences, une même cohérence se laisse reconnaître : l’exigence première est celle d’une puissance capable d’interrompre l’indécision et de donner à l’ordre une effectivité. +Une première famille regroupe les pensées pour lesquelles la question +centrale est celle de *l'exécution de l'ordre*. Chez Hobbes, chez +Schmitt, et sous une forme très différente chez Weber, ce qui importe +avant tout est qu'un monde ne soit pas livré à l'indétermination. La +régulation y vaut d'abord par sa capacité à faire tenir, à trancher, à +décider, à garantir une continuité opératoire face à la dispersion des +volontés, à la conflictualité des intérêts ou à la menace de +désagrégation. Bien sûr, les écarts entre ces auteurs sont +considérables. Hobbes pense la sortie de la guerre civile par la +concentration de la puissance ; Schmitt fait de la décision d'exception +le cœur irréductible du politique ; Weber, quant à lui, analyse la +stabilisation rationnelle de l'ordre à travers la forme bureaucratique +et la légalité procédurale. Pourtant, malgré ces différences, une même +cohérence se laisse reconnaître : l'exigence première est celle d'une +puissance capable d'interrompre l'indécision et de donner à l'ordre une +effectivité. -Le mérite majeur de cette famille est de rappeler qu’aucun monde commun ne se maintient par la seule normativité déclarée. Il faut des formes d’exécution, des relais d’effectuation, des instances capables d’arrêter l’indétermination. Son angle mort apparaît dès que cette fonction se totalise : ce qui rend l’ordre opératoire tend alors à rendre sa reprise plus difficile, comme si toute exposition à l’épreuve menaçait immédiatement la tenue du tout. Toute la difficulté consiste alors à préserver la force d’exécution sans sacrifier la possibilité d’une scène effectivement praticable. +Le mérite majeur de cette famille est de rappeler qu'aucun monde commun +ne se maintient par la seule normativité déclarée. Il faut des formes +d'exécution, des relais d'effectuation, des instances capables d'arrêter +l'indétermination. Son angle mort apparaît dès que cette fonction se +totalise : ce qui rend l'ordre opératoire tend alors à rendre sa reprise +plus difficile, comme si toute exposition à l'épreuve menaçait +immédiatement la tenue du tout. Toute la difficulté consiste alors à +préserver la force d'exécution sans sacrifier la possibilité d'une scène +effectivement praticable. -Une seconde famille réunit les pensées qui font de la publicité, de la parole et du dissensus la condition même de la régulation. Rousseau en constitue une figure paradoxale, puisqu’il ne pense pas la publicité comme pluralité ouverte mais comme expression d’un corps civique supposé capable de se vouloir lui-même. Avec Habermas, cette dimension devient plus explicitement dialogique : la régulation n’est légitime qu’à condition que les normes puissent être soumises à l’épreuve d’une discussion publique. +Une seconde famille réunit les pensées qui font de la publicité, de la +parole et du dissensus la condition même de la régulation. Rousseau en +constitue une figure paradoxale, puisqu'il ne pense pas la publicité +comme pluralité ouverte mais comme expression d'un corps civique supposé +capable de se vouloir lui-même. Avec Habermas, cette dimension devient +plus explicitement dialogique : la régulation n'est légitime qu'à +condition que les normes puissent être soumises à l'épreuve d'une +discussion publique. -La puissance propre de la perspective habermassienne est d’avoir maintenu l’exigence d’une légitimation discursive et d’une mise à l’épreuve argumentative des normes. Sa limite, pour notre enquête, tient toutefois à ce qu’elle présuppose encore relativement la disponibilité d’espaces de discussion identifiables, là où une part décisive des régulations contemporaines se déploie en amont de la délibération, dans des chaînes techniques, calculatoires et procédurales dont l’opérativité excède précisément les formats discursifs qui permettraient d’en répondre. +La puissance propre de la perspective habermassienne est d'avoir +maintenu l'exigence d'une légitimation discursive et d'une mise à +l'épreuve argumentative des normes. Sa limite, pour notre enquête, tient +toutefois à ce qu'elle présuppose encore relativement la disponibilité +d'espaces de discussion identifiables, là où une part décisive des +régulations contemporaines se déploie en amont de la délibération, dans +des chaînes techniques, calculatoires et procédurales dont l'opérativité +excède précisément les formats discursifs qui permettraient d'en +répondre. -Avec Lefort, la vacance du lieu du pouvoir interdit toute appropriation définitive de la scène politique ; avec Rancière, enfin, le dissensus devient le moment où l’ordre du visible est interrompu par ceux qui n’y avaient pas part. Malgré leurs divergences profondes, ces pensées partagent une même intuition : un ordre n’est politiquement recevable qu’à condition de ne pas se soustraire à l’épreuve de sa propre exposition. +Avec Lefort, la vacance du lieu du pouvoir interdit toute appropriation +définitive de la scène politique ; avec Rancière, enfin, le dissensus +devient le moment où l'ordre du visible est interrompu par ceux qui n'y +avaient pas part. Malgré leurs divergences profondes, ces pensées +partagent une même intuition : un ordre n'est politiquement recevable +qu'à condition de ne pas se soustraire à l'épreuve de sa propre +exposition. -Cette famille préserve une dimension sans laquelle le politique perd sa consistance propre : l’ordre n’est recevable qu’à la condition de ne pas se soustraire entièrement à l’épreuve de sa propre apparition. Mais cette primauté de la scène rencontre une limite constante : rien ne garantit, par elle seule, que l’ouverture se traduise en transformation effective. Une parole peut devenir visible sans acquérir de prise ; un dissensus peut être reconnu sans trouver de relais institutionnels ; une exigence de justification peut demeurer nominale lorsque les asymétries de compétence, de temps ou de position continuent d’organiser souterrainement la scène. Ici encore, la question n’est donc pas de disqualifier cette famille, mais de reconnaître qu’une scène, si ouverte soit-elle, ne se suffit jamais à elle-même. +Cette famille préserve une dimension sans laquelle le politique perd sa +consistance propre : l'ordre n'est recevable qu'à la condition de ne pas +se soustraire entièrement à l'épreuve de sa propre apparition. Mais +cette primauté de la scène rencontre une limite constante : rien ne +garantit, par elle seule, que l'ouverture se traduise en transformation +effective. Une parole peut devenir visible sans acquérir de prise ; un +dissensus peut être reconnu sans trouver de relais institutionnels ; une +exigence de justification peut demeurer nominale lorsque les asymétries +de compétence, de temps ou de position continuent d'organiser +souterrainement la scène. Ici encore, la question n'est donc pas de +disqualifier cette famille, mais de reconnaître qu'une scène, si ouverte +soit-elle, ne se suffit jamais à elle-même. -Une troisième famille se déploie autour des pensées du dispositif, de la norme diffuse et de la gouvernementalité. Avec Foucault d’abord, puis plus radicalement avec Rouvroy et Berns, la régulation cesse d’apparaître comme le fait d’un centre visible ou d’une délibération instituée ; elle se distribue dans des techniques, des procédures, des classifications, des métriques et des environnements. La force de ces analyses est de rendre intelligible ce que les philosophies classiques du pouvoir avaient souvent laissé dans l’ombre : la manière dont un ordre peut opérer sans se déclarer comme tel, orienter les conduites sans commandement explicite, transformer les possibles sans passer par l’interdit frontal. +Une troisième famille se déploie autour des pensées du dispositif, de la +norme diffuse et de la gouvernementalité. Avec Foucault d'abord, puis +plus radicalement avec Rouvroy et Berns, la régulation cesse +d'apparaître comme le fait d'un centre visible ou d'une délibération +instituée ; elle se distribue dans des techniques, des procédures, des +classifications, des métriques et des environnements. La force de ces +analyses est de rendre intelligible ce que les philosophies classiques +du pouvoir avaient souvent laissé dans l'ombre : la manière dont un +ordre peut opérer sans se déclarer comme tel, orienter les conduites +sans commandement explicite, transformer les possibles sans passer par +l'interdit frontal. -Cette famille éclaire ainsi avec une puissance singulière les modalités diffuses d’effectuation du pouvoir. Mais c’est aussi là que se marque sa limite relative pour notre propos : elle décrit admirablement la dispersion des prises, tout en laissant plus incertaine la question des conditions sous lesquelles cette effectuation peut être reconduite à une scène explicite de comparution, de reprise et de révision. Autrement dit, elle thématise moins frontalement les formes instituées de la réexposition contradictoire. Le risque n’est donc pas tant ici l’autoritarisme visible que l’indisputabilité progressive de ce qui règle. Cette famille impose ainsi à la pensée archicratique une épreuve majeure : ne jamais identifier la scène au seul visible, et apprendre à nommer ce qui manque lorsqu’une régulation sature le réel sans comparaître. +Cette famille éclaire ainsi avec une puissance singulière les modalités +diffuses d'effectuation du pouvoir. Mais c'est aussi là que se marque sa +limite relative pour notre propos : elle décrit admirablement la +dispersion des prises, tout en laissant plus incertaine la question des +conditions sous lesquelles cette effectuation peut être reconduite à une +scène explicite de comparution, de reprise et de révision. Autrement +dit, elle thématise moins frontalement les formes instituées de la +réexposition contradictoire. Le risque n'est donc pas tant ici +l'autoritarisme visible que l'indisputabilité progressive de ce qui +règle. Cette famille impose ainsi à la pensée archicratique une épreuve +majeure : ne jamais identifier la scène au seul visible, et apprendre à +nommer ce qui manque lorsqu'une régulation sature le réel sans +comparaître. -Une quatrième famille peut être dégagée autour des pensées de l’incorporation, de l’individuation et des médiations relationnelles. Mauss, Bourdieu, Spinoza, Elias, Simondon, Rosa et Latour n’appartiennent ni à une même doctrine ni à une même époque. Leur rapprochement ne vaut ni comme filiation doctrinale ni comme école implicite. Il n’est recevable qu’à un niveau strictement morphologique : tous, selon des voies très différentes, déplacent l’intelligence de la régulation vers des médiations qui ne se réduisent pas aux institutions explicites — habitus, affects, échanges incorporés, chaînes d’interdépendance, processus d’individuation, régimes de résonance ou réseaux d’attachements. +Une quatrième famille peut être dégagée autour des pensées de +l'incorporation, de l'individuation et des médiations relationnelles. +Mauss, Bourdieu, Spinoza, Elias, Simondon, Rosa et Latour +n'appartiennent ni à une même doctrine ni à une même époque. Leur +rapprochement ne vaut ni comme filiation doctrinale ni comme école +implicite. Il n'est recevable qu'à un niveau strictement morphologique : +tous, selon des voies très différentes, déplacent l'intelligence de la +régulation vers des médiations qui ne se réduisent pas aux institutions +explicites — habitus, affects, échanges incorporés, chaînes +d'interdépendance, processus d'individuation, régimes de résonance ou +réseaux d'attachements. -Ce déplacement est précieux, car il empêche de réduire la co-viabilité à la seule scène juridico-politique. Il montre qu’un monde tient aussi par des incorporations, des médiations tacites, des ajustements fins, des formes de coordination qui ne passent ni par le décret ni par la délibération publique. Mais cette richesse a son envers : à trop insister sur la texture relationnelle du monde social, on risque de rendre plus difficile la détection du point où une scène devrait s’ouvrir comme telle. La régulation devient partout perceptible, mais sa mise à l’épreuve peut devenir plus difficile à situer. Cette famille enrichit donc puissamment l’analyse archicratique, à condition de ne pas laisser se dissoudre, dans la continuité des médiations, la question de leur exposition. +Ce déplacement est précieux, car il empêche de réduire la co-viabilité à +la seule scène juridico-politique. Il montre qu'un monde tient aussi par +des incorporations, des médiations tacites, des ajustements fins, des +formes de coordination qui ne passent ni par le décret ni par la +délibération publique. Mais cette richesse a son envers : à trop +insister sur la texture relationnelle du monde social, on risque de +rendre plus difficile la détection du point où une scène devrait +s'ouvrir comme telle. La régulation devient partout perceptible, mais sa +mise à l'épreuve peut devenir plus difficile à situer. Cette famille +enrichit donc puissamment l'analyse archicratique, à condition de ne pas +laisser se dissoudre, dans la continuité des médiations, la question de +leur exposition. -Enfin, une cinquième famille se forme autour des pensées de l’expérimentation, de la création et du soin. Deleuze et Guattari, d’un côté, ouvrent une pensée de l’agencement, de la bifurcation et des devenirs qui permet de saisir les puissances de sortie hors des formes closes. Stiegler, de l’autre, montre que la régulation contemporaine se joue aussi dans les dispositifs techniques de temporalisation, d’attention et de transmission, et que toute possibilité de reprise suppose un travail de soin contre l’automatisation destructrice. +Enfin, une cinquième famille se forme autour des pensées de +l'expérimentation, de la création et du soin. Deleuze et Guattari, d'un +côté, ouvrent une pensée de l'agencement, de la bifurcation et des +devenirs qui permet de saisir les puissances de sortie hors des formes +closes. Stiegler, de l'autre, montre que la régulation contemporaine se +joue aussi dans les dispositifs techniques de temporalisation, +d'attention et de transmission, et que toute possibilité de reprise +suppose un travail de soin contre l'automatisation destructrice. -Cette famille rappelle que la régulation ne consiste pas seulement à tenir un ordre, mais aussi à empêcher qu’il ne se ferme sur ses propres automatismes. Elle réintroduit dans l’analyse ce que les familles précédentes laissaient plus souvent à l’arrière-plan : la nécessité de l’invention, de la bifurcation et du soin comme conditions de reprise d’un monde menacé par sa propre inertie. +Cette famille rappelle que la régulation ne consiste pas seulement à +tenir un ordre, mais aussi à empêcher qu'il ne se ferme sur ses propres +automatismes. Elle réintroduit dans l'analyse ce que les familles +précédentes laissaient plus souvent à l'arrière-plan : la nécessité de +l'invention, de la bifurcation et du soin comme conditions de reprise +d'un monde menacé par sa propre inertie. -Mais elle rencontre elle aussi une limite structurelle. Chez Deleuze et Guattari, la création risque de se dissiper faute de sédimentation transmissible ; chez Stiegler, le soin peut demeurer suspendu à des conditions d’institutionnalisation incertaines. L’enjeu est de savoir comment donner tenue à ces possibles sans les figer. +Mais elle rencontre elle aussi une limite structurelle. Chez Deleuze et +Guattari, la création risque de se dissiper faute de sédimentation +transmissible ; chez Stiegler, le soin peut demeurer suspendu à des +conditions d'institutionnalisation incertaines. L'enjeu est de savoir +comment donner tenue à ces possibles sans les figer. -Ainsi comprise, la synthèse typologique ne referme pas le chapitre sur une taxinomie des doctrines ; elle en dégage plutôt une discipline de lecture et de composition. Elle montre que les régimes du pouvoir ne deviennent comparables qu’à la condition d’être rapportés, non à une essence commune, mais aux tensions qu’ils ouvrent, déplacent, saturent ou rendent praticables. L’archicratie n’y apparaît donc ni comme doctrine concurrente, ni comme surplomb interprétatif, mais comme exigence de discernement : une manière de lire ce qu’un régime rend possible, ce qu’il empêche, et ce qu’il oblige à recomposer pour qu’un monde commun demeure habitable. +Ainsi comprise, la synthèse typologique ne referme pas le chapitre sur +une taxinomie des doctrines ; elle en dégage plutôt une discipline de +lecture et de composition. Elle montre que les régimes du pouvoir ne +deviennent comparables qu'à la condition d'être rapportés, non à une +essence commune, mais aux tensions qu'ils ouvrent, déplacent, saturent +ou rendent praticables. L'archicratie n'y apparaît donc ni comme +doctrine concurrente, ni comme surplomb interprétatif, mais comme +exigence de discernement : une manière de lire ce qu'un régime rend +possible, ce qu'il empêche, et ce qu'il oblige à recomposer pour qu'un +monde commun demeure habitable. -Ce parcours par familles fait apparaître une leçon d’ensemble. Aucune d’entre elles n’est suffisante à elle seule ; aucune n’est pour autant négligeable. Chacune préserve une exigence irréductible : la nécessité de l’exécution, l’exigence de publicité, la lucidité sur les dispositifs, l’épaisseur des médiations incorporées, la puissance de l’invention et du soin. Mais chacune tend aussi, lorsqu’elle se referme sur son propre gain, à sacrifier une autre dimension de la régulation. C’est pourquoi la question décisive n’est jamais de choisir une famille contre les autres, mais de penser leurs possibilités de composition. Non pas articulation harmonieuse, ni synthèse réconciliatrice, mais composition tendue : comment maintenir ensemble ce qui exécute, ce qui fonde et ce qui expose à l’épreuve, sans permettre à l’un de ces pôles d’absorber les autres ? +Ce parcours par familles fait apparaître une leçon d'ensemble. Aucune +d'entre elles n'est suffisante à elle seule ; aucune n'est pour autant +négligeable. Chacune préserve une exigence irréductible : la nécessité +de l'exécution, l'exigence de publicité, la lucidité sur les +dispositifs, l'épaisseur des médiations incorporées, la puissance de +l'invention et du soin. Mais chacune tend aussi, lorsqu'elle se referme +sur son propre gain, à sacrifier une autre dimension de la régulation. +C'est pourquoi la question décisive n'est jamais de choisir une famille +contre les autres, mais de penser leurs possibilités de composition. Non +pas articulation harmonieuse, ni synthèse réconciliatrice, mais +composition tendue : comment maintenir ensemble ce qui exécute, ce qui +fonde et ce qui expose à l'épreuve, sans permettre à l'un de ces pôles +d'absorber les autres ? -C’est ici que la démarche archicratique trouve sa fonction propre. Elle ne prétend pas surplomber ces familles ni les annexer à une doctrine plus vaste. Elle opère plus modestement, mais aussi plus rigoureusement : elle fournit un principe de lecture permettant de discerner ce que chaque famille rend pensable, ce qu’elle laisse dans l’ombre, et à quel point elle demeure capable — ou non — de soutenir une co-viabilité effectivement habitable. En ce sens, l’archicratie n’apparaît pas d’abord comme une théorie rivale des grandes pensées du pouvoir ; elle relève plutôt d’une discipline de composition critique. Elle oblige à distinguer la force de la fermeture, la mémoire de la sacralisation, la scène de sa simple apparence, l’invention de sa pure dissipation. +C'est ici que la démarche archicratique trouve sa fonction propre. Elle +ne prétend pas surplomber ces familles ni les annexer à une doctrine +plus vaste. Elle opère plus modestement, mais aussi plus rigoureusement +: elle fournit un principe de lecture permettant de discerner ce que +chaque famille rend pensable, ce qu'elle laisse dans l'ombre, et à quel +point elle demeure capable — ou non — de soutenir une co-viabilité +effectivement habitable. En ce sens, l'archicratie n'apparaît pas +d'abord comme une théorie rivale des grandes pensées du pouvoir ; elle +relève plutôt d'une discipline de composition critique. Elle oblige à +distinguer la force de la fermeture, la mémoire de la sacralisation, la +scène de sa simple apparence, l'invention de sa pure dissipation. -Une telle lecture n’a donc de sens qu’à une condition : ne jamais demander à une famille de pensée de résoudre seule ce qu’elle n’a rendu visible qu’au prix d’une perte. C’est seulement sous cette discipline — tenir ensemble ce qu’une famille sauve, ce qu’elle sacrifie et ce qu’elle oblige à recomposer — qu’une topologie des régimes régulateurs peut éclairer, sans les trahir, les conditions d’un monde commun habitable. +Une telle lecture n'a donc de sens qu'à une condition : ne jamais +demander à une famille de pensée de résoudre seule ce qu'elle n'a rendu +visible qu'au prix d'une perte. C'est seulement sous cette discipline — tenir ensemble ce qu'une famille sauve, ce qu'elle sacrifie et ce +qu'elle oblige à recomposer — qu'une topologie des régimes régulateurs +peut éclairer, sans les trahir, les conditions d'un monde commun +habitable. -Cette section n’avait pas pour fin de distribuer les auteurs dans un classement doctrinal, ni d’ordonner les pensées de la régulation selon une hiérarchie implicite. Elle avait un objectif plus exigeant : rendre comparables des configurations hétérogènes sans effacer ce qui les sépare, et faire apparaître, à même leurs écarts, quelques lignes de discernement capables d’éclairer les conditions d’une co-viabilité soutenable. En ce sens, la synthèse proposée n’est ni un tableau de maîtrise, ni une réduction de la pluralité ; elle est un exercice de mise en tension. +Cette section n'avait pas pour fin de distribuer les auteurs dans un +classement doctrinal, ni d'ordonner les pensées de la régulation selon +une hiérarchie implicite. Elle avait un objectif plus exigeant : rendre +comparables des configurations hétérogènes sans effacer ce qui les +sépare, et faire apparaître, à même leurs écarts, quelques lignes de +discernement capables d'éclairer les conditions d'une co-viabilité +soutenable. En ce sens, la synthèse proposée n'est ni un tableau de +maîtrise, ni une réduction de la pluralité ; elle est un exercice de +mise en tension. -Ce qui en ressort avec netteté, c’est qu’aucune pensée du pouvoir ne peut être comprise isolément à partir de son seul principe déclaratif. Toute configuration régulatrice vaut par ce qu’elle permet de tenir, mais aussi par ce qu’elle tend à sacrifier. Les régimes de l’exécution sauvent l’effectivité, mais risquent la fermeture ; les régimes de la publicité sauvent l’exposition, mais peuvent manquer de prise ; les régimes du dispositif rendent visibles les médiations silencieuses, mais menacent d’effacer la scène ; les régimes de l’expérimentation et du soin rouvrent les possibles, mais s’exposent à la dissipation ou à la fragilité de l’institution. Il n’existe donc pas de forme pure de la co-viabilité : il n’existe que des compositions plus ou moins capables de maintenir ensemble ce qui exécute, ce qui hérite et ce qui s’expose à l’épreuve. +Ce qui en ressort avec netteté, c'est qu'aucune pensée du pouvoir ne +peut être comprise isolément à partir de son seul principe déclaratif. +Toute configuration régulatrice vaut par ce qu'elle permet de tenir, +mais aussi par ce qu'elle tend à sacrifier. Les régimes de l'exécution +sauvent l'effectivité, mais risquent la fermeture ; les régimes de la +publicité sauvent l'exposition, mais peuvent manquer de prise ; les +régimes du dispositif rendent visibles les médiations silencieuses, mais +menacent d'effacer la scène ; les régimes de l'expérimentation et du +soin rouvrent les possibles, mais s'exposent à la dissipation ou à la +fragilité de l'institution. Il n'existe donc pas de forme pure de la +co-viabilité : il n'existe que des compositions plus ou moins capables +de maintenir ensemble ce qui exécute, ce qui hérite et ce qui s'expose à +l'épreuve. -C’est pourquoi la leçon principale de 3.7 n’est pas typologique au sens strict, mais compositionnelle. Une configuration ne devient habitable qu’à la condition d’être contrebalancée, reprise, corrigée, relancée par ce qu’elle ne contient pas d’elle-même. La régulation ne vaut jamais par autosuffisance ; elle vaut par les contre-prises qui empêchent un gain de se transformer en blocage, une mémoire en sacralisation, une scène en simple apparence ou une invention en dispersion sans suite. L’archicratie ne désigne rien d’autre, à ce niveau, que cette discipline de composition sous tension. +C'est pourquoi la leçon principale de 3.7 n'est pas typologique au sens +strict, mais compositionnelle. Une configuration ne devient habitable +qu'à la condition d'être contrebalancée, reprise, corrigée, relancée par +ce qu'elle ne contient pas d'elle-même. La régulation ne vaut jamais par +autosuffisance ; elle vaut par les contre-prises qui empêchent un gain +de se transformer en blocage, une mémoire en sacralisation, une scène en +simple apparence ou une invention en dispersion sans suite. +L'archicratie ne désigne rien d'autre, à ce niveau, que cette discipline +de composition sous tension. -Dans cette perspective, les tableaux morphogénétiques et comparatifs proposés en annexe ne devront pas être lus comme des instruments de classement, mais comme des auxiliaires de lecture. Ils condensent, sous forme synoptique, les lignes d’analyse développées ici, ainsi que les principaux gains, angles morts, contre-prises et seuils de vigilance dégagés au fil de la section. Leur fonction n’est pas de remplacer la prose théorique, mais d’en fournir une version resserrée, mobilisable dans les usages comparatifs et dans les prolongements méthodologiques du chapitre. +Dans cette perspective, les tableaux morphogénétiques et comparatifs +proposés en annexe ne devront pas être lus comme des instruments de +classement, mais comme des auxiliaires de lecture. Ils condensent, sous +forme synoptique, les lignes d'analyse développées ici, ainsi que les +principaux gains, angles morts, contre-prises et seuils de vigilance +dégagés au fil de la section. Leur fonction n'est pas de remplacer la +prose théorique, mais d'en fournir une version resserrée, mobilisable +dans les usages comparatifs et dans les prolongements méthodologiques du +chapitre. -Ce déplacement nous laisse alors à un point méthodologiquement plus solide qu’au seuil de la section. Nous ne disposons pas d’un modèle achevé de la bonne régulation ; nous disposons mieux : d’un ensemble de discernements sur ce qui fait tenir, vaciller, se fermer ou se disperser un monde commun. Une telle acquisition est plus modeste qu’une théorie totale, mais elle est aussi plus rigoureuse. Car la co-viabilité n’est jamais donnée ; elle reste à configurer, à éprouver et à reprendre, dans des montages toujours situés, toujours exposés, toujours révisables. +Ce déplacement nous laisse alors à un point méthodologiquement plus +solide qu'au seuil de la section. Nous ne disposons pas d'un modèle +achevé de la bonne régulation ; nous disposons mieux : d'un ensemble de +discernements sur ce qui fait tenir, vaciller, se fermer ou se disperser +un monde commun. Une telle acquisition est plus modeste qu'une théorie +totale, mais elle est aussi plus rigoureuse. Car la co-viabilité n'est +jamais donnée ; elle reste à configurer, à éprouver et à reprendre, dans +des montages toujours situés, toujours exposés, toujours révisables. ## **3.8 — Émergence du paradigme archicratique : vers une tenségrité régulatoire falsifiable** -Aucun des penseurs traversés dans ce chapitre — de Hobbes à Foucault, de Rousseau à Rancière, de Weber à Ostrom, de Habermas à Stiegler — n’emploie le terme « archicratie ». Aucun ne pose, en ces termes, une triade régulatoire composée d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration. Et pourtant, tous affrontent, d’une manière ou d’une autre, la question cruciale de la viabilité d’un ordre social : comment hériter sans figer, comment agir sans dominer, comment contester sans dissoudre. +Aucun des penseurs traversés dans ce chapitre — de Hobbes à Foucault, +de Rousseau à Rancière, de Weber à Ostrom, de Habermas à Stiegler — n'emploie le terme « archicratie ». Aucun ne pose, en ces termes, une +triade régulatoire composée d'arcalité, de cratialité et d'archicration. +Et pourtant, tous affrontent, d'une manière ou d'une autre, la question +cruciale de la viabilité d'un ordre social : comment hériter sans figer, +comment agir sans dominer, comment contester sans dissoudre. -Ce que ce chapitre a fait émerger, ce n’est ni une doctrine, ni une utopie, mais une grammaire régulatrice implicite. Une grammaire que les philosophies politiques stabilisent rarement de manière simultanée : les régimes de pensée ou de gouvernement privilégient l’un des pôles — l’effectuation souveraine chez Hobbes, la mémoire fondatrice chez Rousseau, la scène discursive chez Habermas — mais aucun ne parvient à les composer sans sacrifice, sans effets de bord, sans impensé résiduel. +Ce que ce chapitre a fait émerger, ce n'est ni une doctrine, ni une +utopie, mais une grammaire régulatrice implicite. Une grammaire que les +philosophies politiques stabilisent rarement de manière simultanée : les +régimes de pensée ou de gouvernement privilégient l'un des pôles — l'effectuation souveraine chez Hobbes, la mémoire fondatrice chez +Rousseau, la scène discursive chez Habermas — mais aucun ne parvient à +les composer sans sacrifice, sans effets de bord, sans impensé résiduel. -Or l’archicratie nomme précisément cette exigence de composition. Elle ne désigne ni l’addition de trois fonctions distinctes, ni leur coexistence pacifique, mais la tension réglée entre trois dimensions qu’aucun ordre durable ne peut éliminer sans se mutiler : une dimension de structuration et de transmission, que nous appelons arcalité ; une dimension d’effectuation et de prise sur le réel, que nous appelons cratialité ; une dimension d’exposition, de mise à l’épreuve et de reprise conflictuelle, que nous appelons archicration. Il ne s’agit pas là de concepts décoratifs, mais d’opérateurs analytiques destinés à rendre lisible ce qui, dans une configuration politique, permet d’hériter sans figer, d’agir sans écraser et de contester sans dissoudre. +Or l'archicratie nomme précisément cette exigence de composition. Elle +ne désigne ni l'addition de trois fonctions distinctes, ni leur +coexistence pacifique, mais la tension réglée entre trois dimensions +qu'aucun ordre durable ne peut éliminer sans se mutiler : une dimension +de structuration et de transmission, que nous appelons arcalité ; une +dimension d'effectuation et de prise sur le réel, que nous appelons +cratialité ; une dimension d'exposition, de mise à l'épreuve et de +reprise conflictuelle, que nous appelons archicration. Il ne s'agit pas +là de concepts décoratifs, mais d'opérateurs analytiques destinés à +rendre lisible ce qui, dans une configuration politique, permet +d'hériter sans figer, d'agir sans écraser et de contester sans +dissoudre. -Ce paradigme n’a d’intérêt qu’à condition de pouvoir être mis à l’épreuve. Il n’invite pas seulement à décrire des régimes, mais à examiner leur robustesse concrète : coût d’accès à la scène de contestation, possibilité effective d’amendement des règles, capacité de révision des héritages institués, visibilité des procédures d’exception, existence de recours, épaisseur publique des seuils de bascule. En ce sens, le chapitre suivant n’aura pas pour fonction d’illustrer l’archicratie comme on illustrerait une thèse déjà acquise, mais de la confronter à des cas, à des bifurcations techniques et politiques, à des dispositifs de gouvernement réels. Le paradigme ne vaudra qu’à cette condition : supporter l’épreuve du terrain sans se refermer en schème auto-protecteur. +Ce paradigme n'a d'intérêt qu'à condition de pouvoir être mis à +l'épreuve. Il n'invite pas seulement à décrire des régimes, mais à +examiner leur robustesse concrète : coût d'accès à la scène de +contestation, possibilité effective d'amendement des règles, capacité de +révision des héritages institués, visibilité des procédures d'exception, +existence de recours, épaisseur publique des seuils de bascule. En ce +sens, le chapitre suivant n'aura pas pour fonction d'illustrer +l'archicratie comme on illustrerait une thèse déjà acquise, mais de la +confronter à des cas, à des bifurcations techniques et politiques, à des +dispositifs de gouvernement réels. Le paradigme ne vaudra qu'à cette +condition : supporter l'épreuve du terrain sans se refermer en schème +auto-protecteur. ### 3.8.1 — Validité structurelle de la triade archicratique -Il ne suffit pas d’énoncer un paradigme pour qu’il acquière une légitimité théorique. Encore faut-il montrer qu’il répond à une difficulté réelle de lisibilité, qu’il ordonne des phénomènes que les cadres disponibles laissent partiellement dispersés, et qu’il le fait sans sacrifier ni la rigueur conceptuelle ni la pluralité des terrains. La triade archicratique — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — ne peut donc valoir ni par l’éclat d’une intuition, ni par la seule cohérence de sa formulation. Elle doit être soumise à une double exigence : rendre plus intelligibles certaines configurations de régulation, et demeurer elle-même exposable au doute critique. +Il ne suffit pas d'énoncer un paradigme pour qu'il acquière une +légitimité théorique. Encore faut-il montrer qu'il répond à une +difficulté réelle de lisibilité, qu'il ordonne des phénomènes que les +cadres disponibles laissent partiellement dispersés, et qu'il le fait +sans sacrifier ni la rigueur conceptuelle ni la pluralité des terrains. +La triade archicratique — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — ne +peut donc valoir ni par l'éclat d'une intuition, ni par la seule +cohérence de sa formulation. Elle doit être soumise à une double +exigence : rendre plus intelligibles certaines configurations de +régulation, et demeurer elle-même exposable au doute critique. -La première justification d’une telle triade tient à un manque repérable dans une grande partie de la littérature politique et sociale : les cadres disponibles décrivent souvent avec finesse soit la fondation et la légitimation de l’ordre, soit les modalités concrètes de son exercice, soit encore les formes de sa contestation, mais plus rarement l’articulation réglée de ces trois dimensions. Les grandes doctrines modernes et contemporaines tendent en effet à sur-investir un registre privilégié — la souveraineté, la norme, la procédure, le conflit, le dispositif, le commun — sans toujours disposer d’un langage capable d’expliciter, dans un même geste, ce qui se transmet, ce qui agit et ce qui se laisse reprendre. C’est ce défaut d’articulation, plus qu’un vide absolu, que la triade archicratique cherche à traiter. +La première justification d'une telle triade tient à un manque repérable +dans une grande partie de la littérature politique et sociale : les +cadres disponibles décrivent souvent avec finesse soit la fondation et +la légitimation de l'ordre, soit les modalités concrètes de son +exercice, soit encore les formes de sa contestation, mais plus rarement +l'articulation réglée de ces trois dimensions. Les grandes doctrines +modernes et contemporaines tendent en effet à sur-investir un registre +privilégié — la souveraineté, la norme, la procédure, le conflit, le +dispositif, le commun — sans toujours disposer d'un langage capable +d'expliciter, dans un même geste, ce qui se transmet, ce qui agit et ce +qui se laisse reprendre. C'est ce défaut d'articulation, plus qu'un vide +absolu, que la triade archicratique cherche à traiter. -Une réserve méthodologique doit toutefois être maintenue avec fermeté. Dire qu’une triade permet de relire un ensemble de philosophies ne signifie pas que toute philosophie du pouvoir soit intrinsèquement triadique, ni qu’elle doive nécessairement l’être pour devenir intelligible. Certaines œuvres construisent délibérément leur cohérence sur une réduction : à la souveraineté, à la norme, au conflit, à la forme de vie, au dispositif ou au commun. L’intérêt de la lecture archicratique n’est alors pas de corriger de force cette réduction en lui imposant une complétude étrangère, mais de montrer ce qu’elle rend visible, ce qu’elle rend aveugle, et à partir de quel point cette réduction cesse d’être heuristique pour devenir mutilante. Le paradigme n’a donc pas pour tâche de redistribuer toutes les pensées dans une symétrie artificielle ; il doit au contraire assumer les cas où la dissymétrie est le fait même à décrire. +Une réserve méthodologique doit toutefois être maintenue avec fermeté. +Dire qu'une triade permet de relire un ensemble de philosophies ne +signifie pas que toute philosophie du pouvoir soit intrinsèquement +triadique, ni qu'elle doive nécessairement l'être pour devenir +intelligible. Certaines œuvres construisent délibérément leur cohérence +sur une réduction : à la souveraineté, à la norme, au conflit, à la +forme de vie, au dispositif ou au commun. L'intérêt de la lecture +archicratique n'est alors pas de corriger de force cette réduction en +lui imposant une complétude étrangère, mais de montrer ce qu'elle rend +visible, ce qu'elle rend aveugle, et à partir de quel point cette +réduction cesse d'être heuristique pour devenir mutilante. Le paradigme +n'a donc pas pour tâche de redistribuer toutes les pensées dans une +symétrie artificielle ; il doit au contraire assumer les cas où la +dissymétrie est le fait même à décrire. -Les grandes doctrines modernes, qu’elles soient contractualistes, décisionnistes, procédurales, fonctionnalistes ou éthiques, tendent chacune à sur-investir un registre : soit la *force d’exécution* (de Hobbes à Schmitt), soit la *normativité justificative* (de Rawls à Habermas), soit l’*autorité instituée* (de Durkheim à Weber), soit la *conflictualité ouverte* (de Rancière à Lefort), soit encore la *plasticité communautaire* (de Ostrom à Dewey). Mais toutes échouent à penser, dans un même geste, les *conditions de la reproduction du cadre*, de la *puissance d’agir* et de la *visibilité de la scène de contestation*. C’est précisément ce défaut d’articulation entre des fonctions vitales de l’ordre social — mémoire instituée, effectuation pragmatique, régulation publique du dissensus — qui appelle une grille triadique. +Les grandes doctrines modernes, qu'elles soient contractualistes, +décisionnistes, procédurales, fonctionnalistes ou éthiques, tendent +chacune à sur-investir un registre : soit la *force d'exécution* (de +Hobbes à Schmitt), soit la *normativité justificative* (de Rawls à +Habermas), soit l'*autorité instituée* (de Durkheim à Weber), soit la +*conflictualité ouverte* (de Rancière à Lefort), soit encore la +*plasticité communautaire* (de Ostrom à Dewey). Mais toutes échouent à +penser, dans un même geste, les *conditions de la reproduction du +cadre*, de la *puissance d'agir* et de la *visibilité de la scène de +contestation*. C'est précisément ce défaut d'articulation entre des +fonctions vitales de l'ordre social — mémoire instituée, effectuation +pragmatique, régulation publique du dissensus — qui appelle une grille +triadique. -Cette proposition ne peut toutefois être recevable qu’à la condition d’une suffisance minimale. Elle ne prétend pas épuiser l’ensemble du réel social, ni fournir une taxinomie complète des institutions. Elle avance plus modestement qu’un grand nombre de configurations deviennent plus lisibles si l’on prête attention à trois prises conjointes : ce qui inscrit et transmet, ce qui effectue et transforme, ce qui expose et remet à l’épreuve. L’hypothèse n’est donc pas encyclopédique ; elle est structurale au sens restreint du terme : elle parie sur le fait que, dans les régimes régulateurs, ces trois dimensions reviennent assez régulièrement pour constituer un principe de discernement opératoire. +Cette proposition ne peut toutefois être recevable qu'à la condition +d'une suffisance minimale. Elle ne prétend pas épuiser l'ensemble du +réel social, ni fournir une taxinomie complète des institutions. Elle +avance plus modestement qu'un grand nombre de configurations deviennent +plus lisibles si l'on prête attention à trois prises conjointes : ce qui +inscrit et transmet, ce qui effectue et transforme, ce qui expose et +remet à l'épreuve. L'hypothèse n'est donc pas encyclopédique ; elle est +structurale au sens restreint du terme : elle parie sur le fait que, +dans les régimes régulateurs, ces trois dimensions reviennent assez +régulièrement pour constituer un principe de discernement opératoire. -Encore faut-il que ces trois termes ne soient ni synonymes, ni simples variantes verbales d’une même fonction. Leur consistance tient précisément à leur différenciation. L’arcalité renvoie à une logique de tenue, de transmission, de mémoire instituée ; la cratialité, à une logique d’effectuation, de prise, d’incidence sur le réel ; l’archicration, à une logique d’exposition, de recevabilité du différend et de mise à l’épreuve. Ces dimensions peuvent se croiser, se recouvrir partiellement, se déformer l’une l’autre ; elles ne se confondent pourtant pas. C’est même de leur non-réductibilité que dépend la portée de la triade : si l’une absorbe les autres, le paradigme cesse d’éclairer les déséquilibres et reconduit ce qu’il prétend analyser. +Encore faut-il que ces trois termes ne soient ni synonymes, ni simples +variantes verbales d'une même fonction. Leur consistance tient +précisément à leur différenciation. L'arcalité renvoie à une logique de +tenue, de transmission, de mémoire instituée ; la cratialité, à une +logique d'effectuation, de prise, d'incidence sur le réel ; +l'archicration, à une logique d'exposition, de recevabilité du différend +et de mise à l'épreuve. Ces dimensions peuvent se croiser, se recouvrir +partiellement, se déformer l'une l'autre ; elles ne se confondent +pourtant pas. C'est même de leur non-réductibilité que dépend la portée +de la triade : si l'une absorbe les autres, le paradigme cesse +d'éclairer les déséquilibres et reconduit ce qu'il prétend analyser. -Une telle différenciation ne vaudrait rien si elle ne trouvait aucun ancrage dans les configurations observables. Or l’expérience politique et institutionnelle montre assez aisément que les crises et les stabilisations mettent presque toujours en jeu, selon des proportions variables, des cadres hérités ou institués, des capacités d’action et de transformation, et des scènes — ouvertes ou empêchées — où peuvent se formuler objections, recours ou litiges. Dans un soulèvement contre une réforme, dans une université, dans une administration, dans une plateforme numérique, on peut repérer des mémoires normatives, des chaînes d’effectuation, et des modes d’exposition plus ou moins praticables de la contestation. La triade n’épouse donc pas le réel terme à terme ; elle permet plutôt d’en faire apparaître certaines tensions récurrentes. +Une telle différenciation ne vaudrait rien si elle ne trouvait aucun +ancrage dans les configurations observables. Or l'expérience politique +et institutionnelle montre assez aisément que les crises et les +stabilisations mettent presque toujours en jeu, selon des proportions +variables, des cadres hérités ou institués, des capacités d'action et de +transformation, et des scènes — ouvertes ou empêchées — où peuvent +se formuler objections, recours ou litiges. Dans un soulèvement contre +une réforme, dans une université, dans une administration, dans une +plateforme numérique, on peut repérer des mémoires normatives, des +chaînes d'effectuation, et des modes d'exposition plus ou moins +praticables de la contestation. La triade n'épouse donc pas le réel +terme à terme ; elle permet plutôt d'en faire apparaître certaines +tensions récurrentes. -L’intérêt d’un tel cadre tient alors à sa fécondité heuristique. Il autorise des hypothèses comparatives : qu’advient-il lorsqu’une capacité d’action se renforce sans procédure réelle de reprise ? que se passe-t-il lorsqu’une mémoire instituée devient indisputable ? qu’arrive-t-il à une scène de contestation privée d’ancrage ou d’effectuation ? Il permet également de construire des indicateurs : fréquence des révisions normatives, existence de recours effectifs, seuils d’accès à la scène, publicité des exceptions, part des calibrations non auditées, capacité d’amendement des règles. En ce sens, la triade n’a pas seulement une portée descriptive ; elle sert aussi d’instrument de diagnostic et de comparaison. +L'intérêt d'un tel cadre tient alors à sa fécondité heuristique. Il +autorise des hypothèses comparatives : qu'advient-il lorsqu'une capacité +d'action se renforce sans procédure réelle de reprise ? que se +passe-t-il lorsqu'une mémoire instituée devient indisputable ? +qu'arrive-t-il à une scène de contestation privée d'ancrage ou +d'effectuation ? Il permet également de construire des indicateurs : +fréquence des révisions normatives, existence de recours effectifs, +seuils d'accès à la scène, publicité des exceptions, part des +calibrations non auditées, capacité d'amendement des règles. En ce sens, +la triade n'a pas seulement une portée descriptive ; elle sert aussi +d'instrument de diagnostic et de comparaison. -Enfin, cette proposition ne gagne rien à se présenter comme apparition sans ascendance. Elle ne vaut qu’en se situant avec précision dans une histoire intellectuelle dont elle ne constitue ni le dépassement autorisé ni la synthèse définitive. L’arcalité peut être éclairée par des pensées de l’institution, de la mémoire, de la transmission ou de la signification sociale ; la cratialité, par des pensées de l’action, du pouvoir, des dispositifs et de l’effectuation ; l’archicration, par des pensées de la scène publique, du dissensus, de la recevabilité du litige et de la performativité critique. L’intérêt de la triade n’est donc pas d’annexer ces traditions, mais de proposer un lieu de mise en rapport où leur dissociation même devient intelligible. +Enfin, cette proposition ne gagne rien à se présenter comme apparition +sans ascendance. Elle ne vaut qu'en se situant avec précision dans une +histoire intellectuelle dont elle ne constitue ni le dépassement +autorisé ni la synthèse définitive. L'arcalité peut être éclairée par +des pensées de l'institution, de la mémoire, de la transmission ou de la +signification sociale ; la cratialité, par des pensées de l'action, du +pouvoir, des dispositifs et de l'effectuation ; l'archicration, par des +pensées de la scène publique, du dissensus, de la recevabilité du litige +et de la performativité critique. L'intérêt de la triade n'est donc pas +d'annexer ces traditions, mais de proposer un lieu de mise en rapport où +leur dissociation même devient intelligible. -À ce stade, il est plus juste de dire ceci : la triade archicratique paraît théoriquement nécessaire dans la mesure où elle répond à un défaut d’articulation récurrent ; elle paraît suffisamment resserrée pour opérer sans prolifération indéfinie ; elle paraît conceptuellement consistante si l’on maintient la non-réductibilité de ses termes ; elle paraît empiriquement lisible dans des régimes concrets ; elle paraît heuristiquement féconde dès lors qu’elle permet de construire des hypothèses et des indicateurs ; elle paraît enfin philosophiquement recevable à condition de demeurer exposée à ce que les traditions qu’elle mobilise lui opposent de résistance. +À ce stade, il est plus juste de dire ceci : la triade archicratique +paraît théoriquement nécessaire dans la mesure où elle répond à un +défaut d'articulation récurrent ; elle paraît suffisamment resserrée +pour opérer sans prolifération indéfinie ; elle paraît conceptuellement +consistante si l'on maintient la non-réductibilité de ses termes ; elle +paraît empiriquement lisible dans des régimes concrets ; elle paraît +heuristiquement féconde dès lors qu'elle permet de construire des +hypothèses et des indicateurs ; elle paraît enfin philosophiquement +recevable à condition de demeurer exposée à ce que les traditions +qu'elle mobilise lui opposent de résistance. -La triade archicratique ne doit donc pas être comprise comme une formule à appliquer, mais comme un opérateur de discernement. Elle n’a d’intérêt qu’à condition d’éclairer des configurations diverses sans abolir leur singularité, et de demeurer elle-même falsifiable par les terrains auxquels elle se confronte. +La triade archicratique ne doit donc pas être comprise comme une formule +à appliquer, mais comme un opérateur de discernement. Elle n'a d'intérêt +qu'à condition d'éclairer des configurations diverses sans abolir leur +singularité, et de demeurer elle-même falsifiable par les terrains +auxquels elle se confronte. ### 3.8.2 — La métaphore opératoire : tenségrité évolutive et régulation dynamique -L’emprunt au vocabulaire de la tenségrité ne vaut ici ni comme effet de style ni comme simple analogie suggestive. Il répond à une difficulté précise : comment nommer une structure qui ne tient ni par un centre souverain unique, ni par l’homogénéité de ses éléments, mais par la mise en tension de composantes hétérogènes dont aucune ne peut absorber les autres sans ruiner l’ensemble ? C’est à cette condition seulement qu’un concept venu d’ailleurs peut devenir opératoire : non lorsqu’il décore une pensée, mais lorsqu’il lui permet de formuler plus rigoureusement une difficulté qu’elle rencontrait déjà. +L'emprunt au vocabulaire de la tenségrité ne vaut ici ni comme effet de +style ni comme simple analogie suggestive. Il répond à une difficulté +précise : comment nommer une structure qui ne tient ni par un centre +souverain unique, ni par l'homogénéité de ses éléments, mais par la mise +en tension de composantes hétérogènes dont aucune ne peut absorber les +autres sans ruiner l'ensemble ? C'est à cette condition seulement qu'un +concept venu d'ailleurs peut devenir opératoire : non lorsqu'il décore +une pensée, mais lorsqu'il lui permet de formuler plus rigoureusement +une difficulté qu'elle rencontrait déjà. -C’est dans cet esprit que nous mobilisons ici la notion de tenségrité. Le terme fut forgé par Buckminster Fuller, tandis que les premières réalisations qui en ont rendu le principe visible doivent beaucoup à Kenneth Snelson. Il importe de le rappeler, non par scrupule érudit secondaire, mais parce que cette généalogie interdit déjà une lecture simpliste : la tenségrité ne désigne pas un schème abstrait détaché de toute matérialité, mais une manière de penser la tenue d’une structure à partir d’éléments hétérogènes maintenus en rapport sans fusion ni centre unique. +C'est dans cet esprit que nous mobilisons ici la notion de tenségrité. +Le terme fut forgé par Buckminster Fuller, tandis que les premières +réalisations qui en ont rendu le principe visible doivent beaucoup à +Kenneth Snelson. Il importe de le rappeler, non par scrupule érudit +secondaire, mais parce que cette généalogie interdit déjà une lecture +simpliste : la tenségrité ne désigne pas un schème abstrait détaché de +toute matérialité, mais une manière de penser la tenue d'une structure à +partir d'éléments hétérogènes maintenus en rapport sans fusion ni centre +unique. -Ce que nous retenons de cette notion n’est donc pas la figure technique elle-même, encore moins le prestige d’un modèle architectural transposé au politique, mais une hypothèse de structure : un système peut conserver une cohérence sans reposer sur un principe unique de commandement, à condition que ses composantes demeurent prises dans des relations de contrainte réciproque. Sous cette forme restreinte, la tenségrité offre un langage utile pour penser un ordre qui ne se maintient ni par fixité absolue, ni par dissolution dans le flux, mais par ajustement sous tension. +Ce que nous retenons de cette notion n'est donc pas la figure technique +elle-même, encore moins le prestige d'un modèle architectural transposé +au politique, mais une hypothèse de structure : un système peut +conserver une cohérence sans reposer sur un principe unique de +commandement, à condition que ses composantes demeurent prises dans des +relations de contrainte réciproque. Sous cette forme restreinte, la +tenségrité offre un langage utile pour penser un ordre qui ne se +maintient ni par fixité absolue, ni par dissolution dans le flux, mais +par ajustement sous tension. -À ce titre, la tenségrité éclaire utilement l’agencement archicratique. Ni l’arcalité, ni la cratialité, ni l’archicration ne peuvent suffire isolément à rendre un régime viable. Livrée à elle-même, l’arcalité se rigidifie ; livrée à elle-même, la cratialité tend à se refermer sur l’effectuation ; livrée à elle-même, l’archicration risque de se dissiper en scène sans prise. Ce que la métaphore rend pensable, ce n’est donc pas une répartition mécanique de fonctions, mais la nécessité d’une co-contrainte : chaque pôle ne tient qu’à la condition d’être limité, repris et relancé par les deux autres. +À ce titre, la tenségrité éclaire utilement l'agencement archicratique. +Ni l'arcalité, ni la cratialité, ni l'archicration ne peuvent suffire +isolément à rendre un régime viable. Livrée à elle-même, l'arcalité se +rigidifie ; livrée à elle-même, la cratialité tend à se refermer sur +l'effectuation ; livrée à elle-même, l'archicration risque de se +dissiper en scène sans prise. Ce que la métaphore rend pensable, ce +n'est donc pas une répartition mécanique de fonctions, mais la nécessité +d'une co-contrainte : chaque pôle ne tient qu'à la condition d'être +limité, repris et relancé par les deux autres. -Une telle co-contrainte ne doit pas être comprise comme un simple équilibre de compensation. Elle désigne plutôt une condition de tenue dans laquelle aucun pôle ne peut se suffire sans produire, à terme, sa propre pathologie. L’arcalité, sans reprise, verse dans la fixation ; la cratialité, sans limitation, tend à absorber la régulation dans la seule effectuation ; l’archicration, sans adossement, menace de se réduire à une pure comparution sans prise. La tenségrité permet ainsi de penser non une réconciliation des fonctions, mais leur dépendance conflictuelle : chacune ne demeure viable qu’en rencontrant la résistance réglée des deux autres. +Une telle co-contrainte ne doit pas être comprise comme un simple +équilibre de compensation. Elle désigne plutôt une condition de tenue +dans laquelle aucun pôle ne peut se suffire sans produire, à terme, sa +propre pathologie. L'arcalité, sans reprise, verse dans la fixation ; la +cratialité, sans limitation, tend à absorber la régulation dans la seule +effectuation ; l'archicration, sans adossement, menace de se réduire à +une pure comparution sans prise. La tenségrité permet ainsi de penser +non une réconciliation des fonctions, mais leur dépendance conflictuelle +: chacune ne demeure viable qu'en rencontrant la résistance réglée des +deux autres. -Toutefois, l’analogie ne devient vraiment utile qu’à une condition : ne pas la figer. Ce n’est pas la tenségrité comme équilibre statique qui importe ici, mais comme stabilité capable d’absorber des variations sans perdre toute cohérence. En ce sens, l’apport des usages biologiques de la notion, notamment chez Donald Ingber, n’a pas valeur de preuve externe pour le paradigme archicratique ; il a valeur d’indice heuristique. La tenségrité cellulaire montre qu’une structure peut demeurer consistante tout en étant traversée par des contraintes, des déformations et des réajustements permanents. C’est cette idée d’une stabilité sous transformation, et non l’importation directe d’un modèle biologique dans le champ politique, que nous retenons ici. +Toutefois, l'analogie ne devient vraiment utile qu'à une condition : ne +pas la figer. Ce n'est pas la tenségrité comme équilibre statique qui +importe ici, mais comme stabilité capable d'absorber des variations sans +perdre toute cohérence. En ce sens, l'apport des usages biologiques de +la notion, notamment chez Donald Ingber, n'a pas valeur de preuve +externe pour le paradigme archicratique ; il a valeur d'indice +heuristique. La tenségrité cellulaire montre qu'une structure peut +demeurer consistante tout en étant traversée par des contraintes, des +déformations et des réajustements permanents. C'est cette idée d'une +stabilité sous transformation, et non l'importation directe d'un modèle +biologique dans le champ politique, que nous retenons ici. -On peut alors préciser le noyau opératoire de la métaphore. L’équilibre tenségral ne désigne pas un état final de concorde, mais un régime de vigilance structurelle. Il ne s’agit pas d’abolir les contradictions, mais d’empêcher qu’elles ne se transforment soit en rupture de l’ensemble, soit en neutralisation silencieuse. Sous cet angle, l’archicratie ne vise ni l’harmonie, ni la stabilité définitive ; elle suppose des procédures de reprise, des seuils d’alerte et des scènes où la tension puisse devenir lisible et traitable. +On peut alors préciser le noyau opératoire de la métaphore. L'équilibre +tenségral ne désigne pas un état final de concorde, mais un régime de +vigilance structurelle. Il ne s'agit pas d'abolir les contradictions, +mais d'empêcher qu'elles ne se transforment soit en rupture de +l'ensemble, soit en neutralisation silencieuse. Sous cet angle, +l'archicratie ne vise ni l'harmonie, ni la stabilité définitive ; elle +suppose des procédures de reprise, des seuils d'alerte et des scènes où +la tension puisse devenir lisible et traitable. -Dans une telle perspective, l’arcalité n’est viable qu’à condition d’être reprise, la cratialité qu’à condition d’être exposée, l’archicration qu’à condition d’être adossée à des formes et à des capacités d’effectuation. Autrement dit, aucun des trois pôles n’agit comme fondement souverain du système ; chacun n’opère qu’en relation avec les autres, dans un agencement où la tenue dépend précisément de l’impossibilité d’un monopole fonctionnel durable. +Dans une telle perspective, l'arcalité n'est viable qu'à condition +d'être reprise, la cratialité qu'à condition d'être exposée, +l'archicration qu'à condition d'être adossée à des formes et à des +capacités d'effectuation. Autrement dit, aucun des trois pôles n'agit +comme fondement souverain du système ; chacun n'opère qu'en relation +avec les autres, dans un agencement où la tenue dépend précisément de +l'impossibilité d'un monopole fonctionnel durable. -La tenségrité vaut ainsi moins comme image que comme opérateur de clarification. Elle permet de penser ensemble trois exigences : l’interdépendance des prises, l’absence de centre unique suffisant, et la nécessité d’une cohérence qui ne supprime ni les écarts ni les reprises. Elle n’introduit ni une synthèse paisible, ni une dialectique réconciliatrice ; elle aide plutôt à concevoir une structure de co-contraintes dont la viabilité dépend de sa capacité à demeurer transformable. +La tenségrité vaut ainsi moins comme image que comme opérateur de +clarification. Elle permet de penser ensemble trois exigences : +l'interdépendance des prises, l'absence de centre unique suffisant, et +la nécessité d'une cohérence qui ne supprime ni les écarts ni les +reprises. Elle n'introduit ni une synthèse paisible, ni une dialectique +réconciliatrice ; elle aide plutôt à concevoir une structure de +co-contraintes dont la viabilité dépend de sa capacité à demeurer +transformable. -Reste alors à savoir si cette métaphore résiste à l’épreuve des cas. Car une tenségrité purement élégante ne serait ici d’aucune utilité. L’enjeu n’est pas de disposer d’une belle image du politique, mais d’un principe de lecture capable d’éclairer les moments où la mémoire se rigidifie, où l’effectuation se ferme sur elle-même, où la scène se vide en pure simulation. Si la notion de tenségrité a ici une portée, ce sera donc uniquement à la mesure de son rendement critique : non parce qu’elle offrirait une figure harmonieuse de la régulation, mais parce qu’elle aiderait à repérer les points où une configuration cesse de tenir par tension réglée et commence à dériver vers la clôture, la préemption ou la dissipation. C’est à cette condition seulement que le paradigme archicratique, compris comme régime de tension transformable, pourra prétendre tenir à la fois sous critique et dans le monde. +Reste alors à savoir si cette métaphore résiste à l'épreuve des cas. Car +une tenségrité purement élégante ne serait ici d'aucune utilité. L'enjeu +n'est pas de disposer d'une belle image du politique, mais d'un principe +de lecture capable d'éclairer les moments où la mémoire se rigidifie, où +l'effectuation se ferme sur elle-même, où la scène se vide en pure +simulation. Si la notion de tenségrité a ici une portée, ce sera donc +uniquement à la mesure de son rendement critique : non parce qu'elle +offrirait une figure harmonieuse de la régulation, mais parce qu'elle +aiderait à repérer les points où une configuration cesse de tenir par +tension réglée et commence à dériver vers la clôture, la préemption ou +la dissipation. C'est à cette condition seulement que le paradigme +archicratique, compris comme régime de tension transformable, pourra +prétendre tenir à la fois sous critique et dans le monde. ### 3.8.3 — Six corollaires fondamentaux du paradigme archicratique -Si le paradigme archicratique veut valoir comme autre chose qu’une proposition spéculative, il doit accepter l’épreuve de ses conséquences internes. Un paradigme n’acquiert de portée réelle que s’il permet de dégager des corollaires capables d’expliciter ses conditions de fonctionnement, d’en faire apparaître les points de fragilité et d’en tester la résistance sur des configurations effectives. L’enjeu n’est donc pas seulement logique ; il est aussi heuristique et critique. +Si le paradigme archicratique veut valoir comme autre chose qu'une +proposition spéculative, il doit accepter l'épreuve de ses conséquences +internes. Un paradigme n'acquiert de portée réelle que s'il permet de +dégager des corollaires capables d'expliciter ses conditions de +fonctionnement, d'en faire apparaître les points de fragilité et d'en +tester la résistance sur des configurations effectives. L'enjeu n'est +donc pas seulement logique ; il est aussi heuristique et critique. -En tant que structure de co-viabilité fondée sur la tension entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration, le paradigme archicratique appelle ainsi des corollaires différenciés. Ceux-ci décrivent les formes de dérive qui apparaissent lorsqu’un pôle s’autonomise, lorsqu’un autre s’affaisse, ou lorsque leur mise en tension cesse d’être effectivement soutenue. +En tant que structure de co-viabilité fondée sur la tension entre +arcalité, cratialité et archicration, le paradigme archicratique appelle +ainsi des corollaires différenciés. Ceux-ci décrivent les formes de +dérive qui apparaissent lorsqu'un pôle s'autonomise, lorsqu'un autre +s'affaisse, ou lorsque leur mise en tension cesse d'être effectivement +soutenue. -Nous en retiendrons six. Ils ne constituent pas un code complet de la régulation, mais une matrice critique minimale permettant d’évaluer si l’agencement des pôles demeure viable, ou s’il a commencé à dériver vers une forme de capture, de rigidification ou de neutralisation. +Nous en retiendrons six. Ils ne constituent pas un code complet de la +régulation, mais une matrice critique minimale permettant d'évaluer si +l'agencement des pôles demeure viable, ou s'il a commencé à dériver vers +une forme de capture, de rigidification ou de neutralisation. -#### **Corollaire I : L’héritage sans relecture devient injonction** +#### **Corollaire I : L'héritage sans relecture devient injonction** -L’a*rcalité*, en tant que prise instituante sur la durée, ne vaut que si elle demeure traversable — non au sens de perméabilité sans forme, mais au sens d’une structure interprétable, appropriable, disputable. Car sans cette relecture située, contextualisée, actualisée, le passé cesse d’être une mémoire vive pour devenir une prescription morte. Ce qui devait être le ferment d’un commun durable devient alors une source d’obéissance muette, d’adhésion contrainte, de clôture symbolique. +L'a*rcalité*, en tant que prise instituante sur la durée, ne vaut que si +elle demeure traversable — non au sens de perméabilité sans forme, +mais au sens d'une structure interprétable, appropriable, disputable. +Car sans cette relecture située, contextualisée, actualisée, le passé +cesse d'être une mémoire vive pour devenir une prescription morte. Ce +qui devait être le ferment d'un commun durable devient alors une source +d'obéissance muette, d'adhésion contrainte, de clôture symbolique. -Dès qu’elle se soustrait à la reprise critique, l’arcalité tend à se dogmatiser. On passe alors d’un héritage transmissible — donc transformable — à une autorité sacralisée, soustraite à la discussion. La mémoire ne joue plus comme ressource de configuration ; elle commence à fonctionner comme principe d’immunité contre l’épreuve. +Dès qu'elle se soustrait à la reprise critique, l'arcalité tend à se +dogmatiser. On passe alors d'un héritage transmissible — donc +transformable — à une autorité sacralisée, soustraite à la discussion. +La mémoire ne joue plus comme ressource de configuration ; elle commence +à fonctionner comme principe d'immunité contre l'épreuve. -Cette fermeture produit des effets politiques très concrets, car un régime arcal non contestable tend vers la fossilisation : ses normes ne peuvent plus être mises à jour ; ses cadres deviennent inamovibles ; son langage devient incantatoire. L’*arcalité* cesse alors d’être un milieu de symbolisation ouverte, pour devenir un mécanisme de légitimation autoritaire. La tradition y joue le rôle de fondement absolu — non plus comme point de départ reconfigurable, mais comme horizon indépassable. +Cette fermeture produit des effets politiques très concrets, car un +régime arcal non contestable tend vers la fossilisation : ses normes ne +peuvent plus être mises à jour ; ses cadres deviennent inamovibles ; son +langage devient incantatoire. L'*arcalité* cesse alors d'être un milieu +de symbolisation ouverte, pour devenir un mécanisme de légitimation +autoritaire. La tradition y joue le rôle de fondement absolu — non +plus comme point de départ reconfigurable, mais comme horizon +indépassable. -La philosophie politique moderne a tenté d’y résister. Castoriadis, avec sa notion de l’institution imaginaire de la société, insiste sur le fait que toute institution n’est légitime que si elle peut être reprise, rejouée, refondée dans et par l’imaginaire social instituant. L’institution qui se prend pour son propre fondement devient non pas tradition, mais délires d’auto-référence. De même, chez Hannah Arendt, la condition politique repose sur la natalité, c’est-à-dire la capacité d’inaugurer, de commencer. Or, l’*arcalité* non relue étrangle la natalité : elle impose un éternel retour du même, où la répétition tient lieu de justice. +La philosophie politique moderne a tenté d'y résister. Castoriadis, avec +sa notion de l'institution imaginaire de la société, insiste sur le fait +que toute institution n'est légitime que si elle peut être reprise, +rejouée, refondée dans et par l'imaginaire social instituant. +L'institution qui se prend pour son propre fondement devient non pas +tradition, mais délires d'auto-référence. De même, chez Hannah Arendt, +la condition politique repose sur la natalité, c'est-à-dire la capacité +d'inaugurer, de commencer. Or, l'*arcalité* non relue étrangle la +natalité : elle impose un éternel retour du même, où la répétition tient +lieu de justice. -On retrouve également cette tension dans les travaux de Paul Ricoeur (*La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli*, 2000), qui distingue la mémoire vive de la mémoire empêchée, et insiste sur la nécessité herméneutique d’une relecture critique du passé, condition de toute historicité démocratique. +On retrouve également cette tension dans les travaux de Paul Ricoeur +(*La mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli*, 2000), qui distingue la mémoire vive +de la mémoire empêchée, et insiste sur la nécessité herméneutique d'une +relecture critique du passé, condition de toute historicité +démocratique. -Cette logique conduit à ce que nous nommons une métastabilité autoritaire : une stabilité obtenue non par équilibre réglé, mais par verrouillage rigide des possibles. C’est la société bloquée — non pas parce qu’elle serait incapable d’agir, mais parce qu’elle s’interdit de penser autrement que selon les formes héritées. Dès lors, l’effort critique tend à être disqualifié, l’adaptation soupçonnée, et la divergence requalifiée en atteinte au commun hérité. +Cette logique conduit à ce que nous nommons une métastabilité +autoritaire : une stabilité obtenue non par équilibre réglé, mais par +verrouillage rigide des possibles. C'est la société bloquée — non pas +parce qu'elle serait incapable d'agir, mais parce qu'elle s'interdit de +penser autrement que selon les formes héritées. Dès lors, l'effort +critique tend à être disqualifié, l'adaptation soupçonnée, et la +divergence requalifiée en atteinte au commun hérité. -Plus profondément, l’arcalité figée impose un cadre de sens soustrait à l’épreuve. La transmission tend alors à se refermer sur la répétition, le récit historique à perdre sa pluralité, et l’ordre symbolique à se présenter comme allant de soi. Et dans ce contexte, la mémoire se mue en injonction de légitimation. +Plus profondément, l'arcalité figée impose un cadre de sens soustrait à +l'épreuve. La transmission tend alors à se refermer sur la répétition, +le récit historique à perdre sa pluralité, et l'ordre symbolique à se +présenter comme allant de soi. Et dans ce contexte, la mémoire se mue en +injonction de légitimation. -C’est pourquoi ce premier corollaire est fondamental. Il ne s’agit pas d’accuser toute *arcalité* de conservatisme, mais de rappeler que l’*arcalité* sans *archicration* est vouée à la stérilité. Elle peut durer, oui — mais au prix de l’asphyxie du devenir. Elle peut structurer, oui — mais au prix de l’interdit de refondation. Elle peut légitimer — mais sans jamais laisser place à l’énonciation critique de ses propres limites. +C'est pourquoi ce premier corollaire est fondamental. Il ne s'agit pas +d'accuser toute *arcalité* de conservatisme, mais de rappeler que +l'*arcalité* sans *archicration* est vouée à la stérilité. Elle peut +durer, oui — mais au prix de l'asphyxie du devenir. Elle peut +structurer, oui — mais au prix de l'interdit de refondation. Elle peut +légitimer — mais sans jamais laisser place à l'énonciation critique de +ses propres limites. -L’arcalité ne peut donc demeurer viable qu’à la condition d’accepter d’être relue, discutée et réinterprétée dans des scènes instituées de confrontation. Sans cela, elle cesse d’être un appui pour la durée et devient un opérateur de clôture. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsqu’il invoque le passé comme justification indiscutable, sans ouvrir ses héritages à une reprise située. +L'arcalité ne peut donc demeurer viable qu'à la condition d'accepter +d'être relue, discutée et réinterprétée dans des scènes instituées de +confrontation. Sans cela, elle cesse d'être un appui pour la durée et +devient un opérateur de clôture. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsqu'il +invoque le passé comme justification indiscutable, sans ouvrir ses +héritages à une reprise située. #### **Corollaire II : La force sans épreuve devient empêchement** -La *cratialité*, dans le paradigme archicratique, désigne la capacité opérante d’un collectif à produire des effets tangibles, à configurer le réel, à agir dans et sur le monde. Elle est l’incidence concrète d’une organisation sur son environnement, sa capacité à transformer, organiser, mobiliser, stabiliser, faire advenir. Elle correspond à ce que Foucault nommait l’action sur les actions — une stratégie sans sujet, une force qui circule, s’ajuste, s’agence. +La *cratialité*, dans le paradigme archicratique, désigne la capacité +opérante d'un collectif à produire des effets tangibles, à configurer le +réel, à agir dans et sur le monde. Elle est l'incidence concrète d'une +organisation sur son environnement, sa capacité à transformer, +organiser, mobiliser, stabiliser, faire advenir. Elle correspond à ce +que Foucault nommait l'action sur les actions — une stratégie sans +sujet, une force qui circule, s'ajuste, s'agence. -Mais cette force, si elle ne se laisse pas éprouver, devient un empêchement structurel. Car toute *cratialité* qui ne s’expose pas à l’objection, qui ne se laisse pas contredire, qui se soustrait au bien fondé de sa légitimité, tend à se naturaliser, à se présenter comme allant de soi, comme seule option raisonnable, comme implacable nécessité. Elle se transforme alors en un pouvoir silencieux, imperméable à la critique, cloisonné derrière le paravent de l’efficacité. +Mais cette force, si elle ne se laisse pas éprouver, devient un +empêchement structurel. Car toute *cratialité* qui ne s'expose pas à +l'objection, qui ne se laisse pas contredire, qui se soustrait au bien +fondé de sa légitimité, tend à se naturaliser, à se présenter comme +allant de soi, comme seule option raisonnable, comme implacable +nécessité. Elle se transforme alors en un pouvoir silencieux, +imperméable à la critique, cloisonné derrière le paravent de +l'efficacité. -Cela produit des formes d’empêchement peu visibles : des régimes d’autorité qui n’ont pas nécessairement besoin de réprimer ouvertement, parce qu’ils organisent en amont les conditions de l’adhésion ou de l’acceptation passive. Des systèmes où le contrôle se fait sans coercition visible, où l’agir est canalisé avant même de se poser comme problème. C’est ce que la gouvernementalité néolibérale a perfectionné par l’intermédiaire d’un ordre incorporé, infrastructurel, algorithmique. Un ordre où la puissance ne se nomme plus, mais s’insinue dans les comportements, les interfaces, les architectures d’action. +Cela produit des formes d'empêchement peu visibles : des régimes +d'autorité qui n'ont pas nécessairement besoin de réprimer ouvertement, +parce qu'ils organisent en amont les conditions de l'adhésion ou de +l'acceptation passive. Des systèmes où le contrôle se fait sans +coercition visible, où l'agir est canalisé avant même de se poser comme +problème. C'est ce que la gouvernementalité néolibérale a perfectionné +par l'intermédiaire d'un ordre incorporé, infrastructurel, +algorithmique. Un ordre où la puissance ne se nomme plus, mais s'insinue +dans les comportements, les interfaces, les architectures d'action. -Cela rejoint les analyses de Pierre Dardot et Christian Laval (*La nouvelle raison du monde*, 2009), qui montrent que le néolibéralisme ne s’impose pas par des injonctions directes, mais en structurant les comportements individuels à travers des normes intériorisées de performance, de responsabilité et d’auto-entrepreneuriat. Le pouvoir n’y est plus porté par un sujet central, mais disséminé à travers des dispositifs qui organisent l’agir selon les logiques d’optimisation, de calcul et de mise en valeur de soi. +Cela rejoint les analyses de Pierre Dardot et Christian Laval (*La +nouvelle raison du monde*, 2009), qui montrent que le néolibéralisme ne +s'impose pas par des injonctions directes, mais en structurant les +comportements individuels à travers des normes intériorisées de +performance, de responsabilité et d'auto-entrepreneuriat. Le pouvoir n'y +est plus porté par un sujet central, mais disséminé à travers des +dispositifs qui organisent l'agir selon les logiques d'optimisation, de +calcul et de mise en valeur de soi. -Dans une telle configuration, la *cratialité* devient opaque : elle agit sans se dire, sans s’exposer, sans seuil de réversibilité. Elle interdit alors toute possibilité de reconfiguration, car elle neutralise en amont les conditions mêmes du questionnement. On n’interroge plus ce qui agit, parce qu’on ne sait plus qui ou quoi agit, ni selon quelles logiques. La force devient impensée — et donc inarrêtable. Ce n’est plus la violence de l’empire, mais la fluidité imperceptible de l’empêchement technico-symbolique. +Dans une telle configuration, la *cratialité* devient opaque : elle agit +sans se dire, sans s'exposer, sans seuil de réversibilité. Elle interdit +alors toute possibilité de reconfiguration, car elle neutralise en amont +les conditions mêmes du questionnement. On n'interroge plus ce qui agit, +parce qu'on ne sait plus qui ou quoi agit, ni selon quelles logiques. La +force devient impensée — et donc inarrêtable. Ce n'est plus la +violence de l'empire, mais la fluidité imperceptible de l'empêchement +technico-symbolique. -Simondon nous en avait avertis : toute effectuation non transductive, c’est-à-dire non traversée par la reprise critique de ses tensions, dégénère en simple exécution, en automatisme sans régulation. La *cratialité* sans mise à l’épreuve archicratique n’individualise rien : elle applique, impose, écrase. Elle produit des formes sans plasticité, des actions sans cadre conflictuel, des décisions sans justification. +Simondon nous en avait avertis : toute effectuation non transductive, +c'est-à-dire non traversée par la reprise critique de ses tensions, +dégénère en simple exécution, en automatisme sans régulation. La +*cratialité* sans mise à l'épreuve archicratique n'individualise rien : +elle applique, impose, écrase. Elle produit des formes sans plasticité, +des actions sans cadre conflictuel, des décisions sans justification. -L’histoire politique montre souvent comment l’efficacité est invoquée comme substitut de la légitimité : ce qui fonctionne serait, de ce seul fait, justifié. Une telle rhétorique de l’évidence fonctionnelle court-circuite la discussion, disqualifie l’objection et traite toute résistance comme irresponsable. Or un ordre dont les mécanismes d’action cessent d’être exposés à l’épreuve tend, à terme, à se rigidifier et à perdre sa capacité d’ajustement. +L'histoire politique montre souvent comment l'efficacité est invoquée +comme substitut de la légitimité : ce qui fonctionne serait, de ce seul +fait, justifié. Une telle rhétorique de l'évidence fonctionnelle +court-circuite la discussion, disqualifie l'objection et traite toute +résistance comme irresponsable. Or un ordre dont les mécanismes d'action +cessent d'être exposés à l'épreuve tend, à terme, à se rigidifier et à +perdre sa capacité d'ajustement. -Ce que ce corollaire affirme avec force, c’est donc qu’aucune *cratialité* n’est légitime si elle ne supporte d’être éprouvée. La puissance d’agir doit donc pouvoir être confrontée à ses effets, à ses abus, à ses externalités. Elle doit pouvoir être arrêtée, amendée, redéployée. Elle doit se soumettre à des seuils de mise en visibilité, à des formes de recevabilité, à des procédures contradictoires. +Ce que ce corollaire affirme avec force, c'est donc qu'aucune +*cratialité* n'est légitime si elle ne supporte d'être éprouvée. La +puissance d'agir doit donc pouvoir être confrontée à ses effets, à ses +abus, à ses externalités. Elle doit pouvoir être arrêtée, amendée, +redéployée. Elle doit se soumettre à des seuils de mise en visibilité, à +des formes de recevabilité, à des procédures contradictoires. -Cela implique la mise en place de *contre-prises archicratiques* : des mécanismes qui permettent à la force d’être nommée, discutée, désignée comme telle. Des dispositifs de confrontation où l’on peut dire : « ceci est un usage de pouvoir », et non le faire passer pour un ajustement neutre. Des espaces où les effets d’un acte sont rapportables à un cadre, à un acteur, à une procédure. Car un ordre qui agit sans jamais se montrer comme tel rend invivable, même s’il demeure techniquement fonctionnel. +Cela implique la mise en place de *contre-prises archicratiques* : des +mécanismes qui permettent à la force d'être nommée, discutée, désignée +comme telle. Des dispositifs de confrontation où l'on peut dire : « ceci +est un usage de pouvoir », et non le faire passer pour un ajustement +neutre. Des espaces où les effets d'un acte sont rapportables à un +cadre, à un acteur, à une procédure. Car un ordre qui agit sans jamais +se montrer comme tel rend invivable, même s'il demeure techniquement +fonctionnel. -Prenons l’exemple d’une plateforme numérique : ses algorithmes organisent les parcours, hiérarchisent les visibilités, imposent des routines d’usage. Tant que cette *cratialité* reste non contestable — c’est-à-dire opaque, non modifiable, sans recours —, elle devient un empêchement structurel. Non parce qu’elle est inefficace, mais parce qu’elle ne laisse plus d’espace à l’initiative, à la reprise, à l’alternative. Le pouvoir, ici, se nie comme tel — et c’est précisément ce qui le rend total. +Prenons l'exemple d'une plateforme numérique : ses algorithmes +organisent les parcours, hiérarchisent les visibilités, imposent des +routines d'usage. Tant que cette *cratialité* reste non contestable — c'est-à-dire opaque, non modifiable, sans recours —, elle devient un +empêchement structurel. Non parce qu'elle est inefficace, mais parce +qu'elle ne laisse plus d'espace à l'initiative, à la reprise, à +l'alternative. Le pouvoir, ici, se nie comme tel — et c'est +précisément ce qui le rend total. -Enfin, il faut insister sur une idée centrale : la *cratialité archicratique* n’est pas l’ennemie de l’efficacité, mais elle en est la condition durable. Car seule une force mise à l’épreuve peut apprendre de ses erreurs, ajuster ses dispositifs, affiner ses protocoles. Seule une puissance contestable peut devenir résiliente. Le test en est la garantie critique. +Enfin, il faut insister sur une idée centrale : la *cratialité +archicratique* n'est pas l'ennemie de l'efficacité, mais elle en est la +condition durable. Car seule une force mise à l'épreuve peut apprendre +de ses erreurs, ajuster ses dispositifs, affiner ses protocoles. Seule +une puissance contestable peut devenir résiliente. Le test en est la +garantie critique. -Une cratialité qui ne se laisse plus interroger cesse alors d’être une puissance régulée pour devenir une autorité close. Elle ne compose plus avec l’épreuve ; elle tend à s’y soustraire. +Une cratialité qui ne se laisse plus interroger cesse alors d'être une +puissance régulée pour devenir une autorité close. Elle ne compose plus +avec l'épreuve ; elle tend à s'y soustraire. -Un régime archicratique, au contraire, s’assure que toute force puisse être ramenée à un franchissement critique, à un espace de visibilité, à une forme de confrontation située. C’est à cette condition que l’agir peut être légitime — non parce qu’il serait toujours juste, mais parce qu’il accepte d’être jugé. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque ses mécanismes d’action ne peuvent être ni contestés, ni visibles, ni soumis à un processus de régulation contradictoire. +Un régime archicratique, au contraire, s'assure que toute force puisse +être ramenée à un franchissement critique, à un espace de visibilité, à +une forme de confrontation située. C'est à cette condition que l'agir +peut être légitime — non parce qu'il serait toujours juste, mais parce +qu'il accepte d'être jugé. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque ses +mécanismes d'action ne peuvent être ni contestés, ni visibles, ni soumis +à un processus de régulation contradictoire. #### **Corollaire III : La scène sans seuils devient simulacre** -Il ne suffit pas d’ouvrir une scène. Encore faut-il qu’elle institue un cadre contradictoire, qu’elle rende les interventions situables et qu’elle garantisse la possibilité de leur traitement. Une archicration sans lieu d’articulation, sans formes de recevabilité et sans temporalité identifiable ne produit ni épreuve ni régulation ; elle tend à se dissoudre dans l’indifférenciation des prises de parole. +Il ne suffit pas d'ouvrir une scène. Encore faut-il qu'elle institue un +cadre contradictoire, qu'elle rende les interventions situables et +qu'elle garantisse la possibilité de leur traitement. Une archicration +sans lieu d'articulation, sans formes de recevabilité et sans +temporalité identifiable ne produit ni épreuve ni régulation ; elle tend +à se dissoudre dans l'indifférenciation des prises de parole. -Ce que ce corollaire pointe, c’est la fragilité constitutive de l’arène archicratique lorsqu’elle oublie sa propre exigence de formalisation. Une scène n’est pas un espace vide où des voix s’élèveraient spontanément. Elle est une architecture d’accueil : elle dispose de seuils, délimite les conditions d’entrée, institue les conditions de recevabilité. Elle trie, non pour exclure arbitrairement, mais pour garantir la justiciabilité des actes de parole, pour produire une situation d’énonciation responsable et réversible. Sans cette exigence de seuil, l’*archicration* se dissout dans une indiscernabilité généralisée. +Ce que ce corollaire pointe, c'est la fragilité constitutive de l'arène +archicratique lorsqu'elle oublie sa propre exigence de formalisation. +Une scène n'est pas un espace vide où des voix s'élèveraient +spontanément. Elle est une architecture d'accueil : elle dispose de +seuils, délimite les conditions d'entrée, institue les conditions de +recevabilité. Elle trie, non pour exclure arbitrairement, mais pour +garantir la justiciabilité des actes de parole, pour produire une +situation d'énonciation responsable et réversible. Sans cette exigence +de seuil, l'*archicration* se dissout dans une indiscernabilité +généralisée. -L’indistinction n’est pas la liberté. C’est l’abolition des écarts repérables, la neutralisation des positions, la disparition des effets différenciateurs de l’interpellation. Une structure d’accueil sans seuils n’est pas plus démocratique ; elle devient rapidement impraticable. Elle engendre ce que Lefort redoutait : un « lieu vide » qui ne serait plus traversé par la conflictualité vivante, mais occupé par une multiplicité flottante, sans ancrage, sans adossement, sans franchissement critique véritable. +L'indistinction n'est pas la liberté. C'est l'abolition des écarts +repérables, la neutralisation des positions, la disparition des effets +différenciateurs de l'interpellation. Une structure d'accueil sans +seuils n'est pas plus démocratique ; elle devient rapidement +impraticable. Elle engendre ce que Lefort redoutait : un « lieu vide » +qui ne serait plus traversé par la conflictualité vivante, mais occupé +par une multiplicité flottante, sans ancrage, sans adossement, sans +franchissement critique véritable. -Prenons l’exemple des dispositifs participatifs mal cadrés : assemblées consultatives ouvertes, débats publics sans modération, plateformes numériques où toute parole se vaut. Ces formes, en prétendant incarner la démocratie directe, produisent souvent leur exact contraire : une saturation de signaux sans traitement, une prolifération de doléances sans filtres, un bruit sans contrepoint. Ce n’est pas la parole qui y est garantie, mais son évacuation par l’encombrement. L’institution d’un seuil — d’un protocole, d’un format, d’un espace-temps réglé — n’est pas une fermeture, mais la condition d’un traitement possible du différend. +Prenons l'exemple des dispositifs participatifs mal cadrés : assemblées +consultatives ouvertes, débats publics sans modération, plateformes +numériques où toute parole se vaut. Ces formes, en prétendant incarner +la démocratie directe, produisent souvent leur exact contraire : une +saturation de signaux sans traitement, une prolifération de doléances +sans filtres, un bruit sans contrepoint. Ce n'est pas la parole qui y +est garantie, mais son évacuation par l'encombrement. L'institution d'un +seuil — d'un protocole, d'un format, d'un espace-temps réglé — n'est +pas une fermeture, mais la condition d'un traitement possible du +différend. -Des travaux empiriques comme ceux de Loïc Blondiaux (*Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie*, 2008) ou de Yves Sintomer (*Le pouvoir au peuple*, 2011) ont démontré que les dispositifs sans architecture de recevabilité produisent plus souvent de la frustration politique que de la citoyenneté active. +Des travaux empiriques comme ceux de Loïc Blondiaux (*Le nouvel esprit +de la démocratie*, 2008) ou de Yves Sintomer (*Le pouvoir au peuple*, +2011) ont démontré que les dispositifs sans architecture de recevabilité +produisent plus souvent de la frustration politique que de la +citoyenneté active. -Il en va de même pour les protocoles judiciaires, parlementaires ou scientifiques : ce n’est pas l’exclusion qui fonde leur légitimité, mais la possibilité de mise en forme, de mise en épreuve, de réversibilité des positions. Le seuil y fonctionne comme un régime d’attention, d’écoute, de responsabilité, sans lequel l’énonciation perd toute portée opératoire. Ce que l’on appelle alors « scène », dans ces configurations, c’est l’ensemble des conditions par lesquelles une voix devient audible comme interpellation recevable. +Il en va de même pour les protocoles judiciaires, parlementaires ou +scientifiques : ce n'est pas l'exclusion qui fonde leur légitimité, mais +la possibilité de mise en forme, de mise en épreuve, de réversibilité +des positions. Le seuil y fonctionne comme un régime d'attention, +d'écoute, de responsabilité, sans lequel l'énonciation perd toute portée +opératoire. Ce que l'on appelle alors « scène », dans ces +configurations, c'est l'ensemble des conditions par lesquelles une voix +devient audible comme interpellation recevable. -Et lorsque cette architecture se dissout — soit par négligence, soit par excès de performativité —, l’archicration devient simulation. Tout est dit, rien n’est entendu. Tout est montré, rien n’est retenu. La visibilité devient spectacle ; la parole devient forme creuse. La scène se mue en anti-scène. +Et lorsque cette architecture se dissout — soit par négligence, soit +par excès de performativité —, l'archicration devient simulation. Tout +est dit, rien n'est entendu. Tout est montré, rien n'est retenu. La +visibilité devient spectacle ; la parole devient forme creuse. La scène +se mue en anti-scène. -Le seuil n’est donc pas un empêchement : il est une condition de consistance. Il distingue l’interpellation de l’expression brute, la requête de l’effusion, la mise en cause du simple témoignage. Il permet à une parole d’adresser quelque chose à quelqu’un dans un espace formalisé de procès contradictoire. Sans seuil, on pourrait dire qu’il n’y a plus de parole publique — seulement des messages privés diffusés en réseau. +Le seuil n'est donc pas un empêchement : il est une condition de +consistance. Il distingue l'interpellation de l'expression brute, la +requête de l'effusion, la mise en cause du simple témoignage. Il permet +à une parole d'adresser quelque chose à quelqu'un dans un espace +formalisé de procès contradictoire. Sans seuil, on pourrait dire qu'il +n'y a plus de parole publique — seulement des messages privés diffusés +en réseau. -Ce corollaire invite donc à repenser l’espace formalisé comme un dispositif de tension, de sélection critique, d’exposition instituée. Il y faut des protocoles de recevabilité, des formes de traitement, des indicateurs de franchissement. L’espace de contestation, pour exister comme tel, doit pouvoir différencier les énoncés, les situer, les traduire, les confronter. +Ce corollaire invite donc à repenser l'espace formalisé comme un +dispositif de tension, de sélection critique, d'exposition instituée. Il +y faut des protocoles de recevabilité, des formes de traitement, des +indicateurs de franchissement. L'espace de contestation, pour exister +comme tel, doit pouvoir différencier les énoncés, les situer, les +traduire, les confronter. -En ce sens, l’égalité formelle ne suffit pas. L’accessibilité sans cadrage n’engendre ni justice, ni démocratie. Car l’égalité sans accessibilité réelle, la parole sans contradictoire, l’interpellation sans dispositif sont les trois figures majeures de l’illusion participative contemporaine — où l’on confond la parole avec le droit de parler, l’écoute avec la réception passive, la visibilité avec la légitimité. +En ce sens, l'égalité formelle ne suffit pas. L'accessibilité sans +cadrage n'engendre ni justice, ni démocratie. Car l'égalité sans +accessibilité réelle, la parole sans contradictoire, l'interpellation +sans dispositif sont les trois figures majeures de l'illusion +participative contemporaine — où l'on confond la parole avec le droit +de parler, l'écoute avec la réception passive, la visibilité avec la +légitimité. -Le point décisif est ici le suivant : pour être opératoire, une scène doit pouvoir contenir l’indétermination sans se refermer pour autant. Elle ne doit pas tout permettre, mais permettre à quelque chose de se jouer réellement. Elle ne vise pas l’ouverture absolue, mais la possibilité d’un conflit audible, d’un désaccord adressable, d’un litige traitable. +Le point décisif est ici le suivant : pour être opératoire, une scène +doit pouvoir contenir l'indétermination sans se refermer pour autant. +Elle ne doit pas tout permettre, mais permettre à quelque chose de se +jouer réellement. Elle ne vise pas l'ouverture absolue, mais la +possibilité d'un conflit audible, d'un désaccord adressable, d'un litige +traitable. -C’est dans cette tension que réside la force régulatrice d’un filtre symbolique bien conçu : non pour sélectionner les voix valables a priori, mais pour rendre possible leur confrontation structurée. De sorte que l’archicration ne produit pas des opinions — elle institue des différends, des tests, des reprises. Elle transforme le discours en enjeu, l’expression en interpellation, l’indignation en adresse. +C'est dans cette tension que réside la force régulatrice d'un filtre +symbolique bien conçu : non pour sélectionner les voix valables a +priori, mais pour rendre possible leur confrontation structurée. De +sorte que l'archicration ne produit pas des opinions — elle institue +des différends, des tests, des reprises. Elle transforme le discours en +enjeu, l'expression en interpellation, l'indignation en adresse. -Un cadre conflictuel qui prétend abolir tout seuil se prive ainsi des conditions mêmes d’une épreuve recevable. Ce n’est pas l’absence de forme qui libère, mais la clarté du passage, la lisibilité de l’épreuve et la possibilité d’une reconnaissance conflictuelle. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsqu’il organise l’accueil de la parole sans conditions de forme, de recevabilité ni de visibilité suffisantes, rendant indistinct tout travail de reconfiguration. +Un cadre conflictuel qui prétend abolir tout seuil se prive ainsi des +conditions mêmes d'une épreuve recevable. Ce n'est pas l'absence de +forme qui libère, mais la clarté du passage, la lisibilité de l'épreuve +et la possibilité d'une reconnaissance conflictuelle. Un ordre échoue à +ce test lorsqu'il organise l'accueil de la parole sans conditions de +forme, de recevabilité ni de visibilité suffisantes, rendant indistinct +tout travail de reconfiguration. #### **Corollaire IV : La critique ritualisée devient neutralisation** -Il ne suffit pas que la critique soit autorisée. Encore faut-il qu’elle puisse produire des effets, déplacer des prises et ouvrir une possibilité réelle de reconfiguration du régime qu’elle vise. Car il existe des configurations où la critique est tolérée, voire mise en scène, non pour être entendue, mais pour être absorbée, vidée de son tranchant, reléguée à un rôle d’ornement démocratique. - -La critique alors ne fait plus trembler l’édifice : elle circule comme fonction régulée, comme assignation rituelle, comme soupape inoffensive d’un ordre qui a appris à mimer sa propre contestation pour mieux la disqualifier. - -Tel est le paradoxe : une archicration peut exister en apparence — tribunes ouvertes, consultations publiques, procédures participatives — sans que jamais ses effets débordent le cadre conflictuel qui les accueille. On y écoute des oppositions. On les laisse s’exprimer. Puis l’on passe à autre chose. La contradiction est ritualisée, encadrée, neutralisée. Elle se matérialise alors comme forme vide. - -Cette désactivation symbolique par ritualisation opère selon plusieurs modalités. D’abord, la segmentation cloisonne les espaces de controverse et empêche leurs résonances systémiques. Ensuite, la temporisation assigne la confrontation à des moments spécifiques — consultations fermées, cycles de débat, séquences balisées — et la rend périodique plutôt que structurellement active. Enfin, la spectacularisation exhibe la critique sans la traiter au fond, en la convertissant en signe d’ouverture plutôt qu’en véritable épreuve. - -Ce processus a été théorisé, entre autres, par Boltanski et Chiapello dans *Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme* (1999) : le pouvoir contemporain se nourrit de la critique pour se réinventer sans jamais se remettre en question. Il intègre les formes du dissensus tout en tentant d’en épuiser la portée : les objections deviennent commentaires, les résistances deviennent « suggestions », les conflits deviennent flux à modérer. De manière convergente, Nancy Fraser (*Scales of Justice*, 2009) alerte sur la transformation de la critique en ressource de valorisation dans les régimes d’hégémonie néo-libérale, où le dissensus devient contenu dans un théâtre de légitimation. - -Dans une telle configuration, l’*archicration* est présente, mais dysfonctionnelle. Elle existe comme décor de légitimité, non comme espace de transformation. La forme y remplace l’effet. L’accès y déplace la puissance. L’expression y dissimule l’absence d’impact. - -Ce corollaire nous oblige à aller au-delà du simple critère de présence d’une scène de contestation. Il ne suffit pas que les voies d’interpellation soient ouvertes : il faut encore que leurs effets soient possibles. Il faut que la critique puisse engendrer un déplacement réel, une inflexion, une reconfiguration. - -Cela implique qu’une parole critique vivante ne soit pas entièrement prévisible dans ses effets : une *archicration* vivante ne peut être entièrement prédite, ni parfaitement contenue. Elle doit comporter une part d’indétermination constitutive, une capacité à submerger les protocoles qui la soutiennent. En d’autres termes : si la scène de contestation ne peut jamais faire vaciller l’ordre qu’elle traverse, alors elle ne conteste plus rien. Elle n’opère plus comme véritable mise à l’épreuve. - -On observe cette dérive dans nombre d’instances contemporaines : commissions d’éthique adossées à des décisions déjà actées ; conventions citoyennes dont les rapports restent lettres mortes ; consultations publiques ignorées dans les arbitrages ; assemblées délibératives incapables d’exercer une quelconque effectuation. - -Le langage critique y est prélevé, recyclé, instrumentalisé comme ressource d’acceptabilité sociale. Il devient un marqueur de conformité plus qu’un opérateur de tension. Il rassure, il donne l’illusion de la dispute, mais ne déplace rien. Ce n’est plus une mise en tension mais un trompe-l’œil régulateur. - -Dès lors, le critère n’est pas l’existence d’une critique, mais sa puissance de transformation. Une critique est archicratique non quand elle est autorisée, mais quand elle est audible, recevable, traitable, potentiellement efficace — même partiellement, même sous conflictualité. - -Telle est l’exigence du paradigme archicratique : rendre visibles les espaces où la critique est mise en scène sans être véritablement traitée, où l’interpellation est permise sans prise effective, et où l’objection est contenue comme rôle toléré plutôt que reçue comme force de transformation. - -Le rituel critique devient alors le lieu d’une déresponsabilisation du pouvoir : « vous avez eu la parole, vous avez été entendus » — mais aucune transformation n’est permise, ni même envisagée. L’ordre s’immunise par la répétition du dissensus. - -Ce que ce corollaire révèle, c’est que l’*archicration* ne saurait être confondue avec la possibilité abstraite de contester. Elle n’existe qu’à condition de menacer — au moins virtuellement — la forme actuelle du pouvoir institué. Une critique qui ne fait courir aucun risque, fût-il limité, à l’ordre institué ne relève plus pleinement de l’archicration ; elle tend à devenir un dispositif de canalisation du dissensus plutôt qu’une véritable mise à l’épreuve. - -C’est pourquoi la critique ritualisée, privée de relais effectifs, devient moins un opérateur de transformation qu’un dispositif de neutralisation du litige sous apparence d’ouverture démocratique. - -En ce sens, l’*archicration* exige une scène traversable — c’est-à-dire capable d’opérer une translation, une transmission, une mutation effective. La critique, pour être légitime, doit pouvoir changer quelque chose. Fût-ce à la marge, fût-ce par déplacement latéral, fût-ce dans la longue temporalité. Faute de quoi, elle cesse d’opérer comme critique : elle devient accompagnement, apaisement ou simple décor de légitimation. - -Le *paradigme archicratique*, à ce stade, pose donc un critère clair : un régime qui met en scène la critique sans lui permettre d’agir — même partiellement — n’est pas archicratique. Il est factuellement autoritaire, même sous apparence délibérative. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque les dispositifs de critique sont formellement tolérés mais sans aucun impact possible sur les décisions, les normes ou les structures. La contestation y est encadrée, segmentée, absorbée comme mise en scène sans transformation. Elle joue son rôle, mais ne déplace rien. - -#### **Corollaire V : L’histoire monopolisée devient arme de légitimation** - -Toute *arcalité*, pour être légitime, doit rester ouverte à l’interprétation, à la controverse, à la pluralité de ses récits. Lorsqu’elle se fige en histoire officielle, lorsqu’elle s’énonce sans pluralisation des voix, lorsqu’elle s’impose comme mémoire unique, elle cesse d’instituer pour commencer à justifier. Elle ne donne plus de raisons au lien social, mais le naturalise a posteriori. - -Ce phénomène est bien connu des régimes autoritaires où les éléments du passé deviennent arguments, non plus terrains d’enquêtes. Il sert alors à couvrir le présent d’un vernis de continuité, à armer les décisions présentes d’un crédit ancestral, à légitimer la domination comme prolongement “naturel” d’un récit historique incontestable. Toute contestation devient dès lors trahison de l’héritage, faute contre la mémoire, offense aux ancêtres voire hérésie contre l’ordre reçu. - -Une telle monopolisation de l’histoire transforme alors l’arcalité en instrument de verrouillage symbolique. C’est ce que Michel-Rolph Trouillot a magistralement mis en exergue dans *Silencing the Past* (1995). L’histoire selon lui n’est jamais neutre ; elle est toujours le résultat de silences produits, de choix opérés, de voix effacées. De sorte que lorsqu’un seul récit prévaut, l’histoire cesse d’être un vecteur de transmission et devient une machinerie de légitimation. Cette critique de l’histoire comme outil de verrouillage est également présente chez Michel de Certeau (*L’écriture de l’histoire*, 1975), qui montre comment l’autorité historique se construit souvent par effacement des marges et des écarts. - -La dérive est double : d’une part, l’histoire est mobilisée comme corpus clos, achevé, indiscutable. Le passé devient archive sacrée, intouchable, non révisable — et donc non transmissible autrement que par répétition ; d’autre part, l’autorité actuelle se fonde sur cette histoire, la cite, l’invoque, la mime pour se consolider, en disqualifiant toute relecture comme menace, tout réexamen comme révisionnisme déloyal. - -C’est là que l’*arcalité*, au lieu de jouer son rôle structurant, bascule dans la stratégie. Elle ne représente plus ce qui donne cadre, repère, intelligibilité et continuité, mais se transforme en ce qui arme, protège, légitime et neutralise. - -Or une *archicratie*, pour être viable, ne peut tolérer cette fermeture. Elle suppose au contraire une *arcalité* interprétable, critiquable, révisable, c’est-à-dire mise en tension par une *archicration* active. Le passé n’y est pas sanctifié, mais revisité à partir des conflits qu’il génère et des pièces et éléments nouveaux que les historiens soumettent à leurs pairs et à la société. La mémoire y est plurielle, exposée, parfois litigieuse, mais justement parce qu’elle reste vivante, activable, discutable. - -C’est toute la différence entre une *arcalité narrative* — faite d’histoires ouvertes, stratifiées, falsifiables — et une *arcalité doctrinaire*, faite d’une seule histoire, close, imposée. Là où l’*archicration* est vivante, le passé est une arène de confrontation. Là où elle est absente, le passé devient objet de révérence, outil de propagande ou argument d’autorité. - -Des États-nations en guerre aux gouvernements populistes, des traditions religieuses institutionnalisées à certaines formes contemporaines de néo-conservatisme, les exemples abondent d’une mobilisation stratégique de l’histoire où une mémoire mythifiée sert à fermer le présent à toute transformation. Les archives, les monuments et les commémorations cessent alors d’être des supports de travail critique pour devenir des instruments de stabilisation symbolique. - -Mais cette monopolisation n’est pas toujours explicite : elle peut être douce, insidieuse, managériale. On la retrouve dans les politiques mémorielles contemporaines qui produisent des narrations clés en main, normées, aseptisées, conçues pour pacifier le dissensus et aligner les subjectivités sur un récit consensuel. Le passé y est alors administré comme un récit d’alignement, sous contrôle des formats, des sélections et des usages légitimes. - -Ce corollaire rappelle donc une exigence fondatrice : toute *arcalité* légitime est plurielle. Elle doit pouvoir être réinterprétée sans que cela soit perçu comme une subversion. Elle doit pouvoir être contestée, recontextualisée, traversée par les conflits sans se déliter. C’est cette capacité à supporter le désaccord que l’*archicration* doit garantir. - -En définitive, un régime n’est archicratique que si son rapport au passé est réversible, transmissible, disputable. Si l’histoire y devient ressource de domination, alors l’*arcalité* s’est retournée contre elle-même. Elle n’ouvre plus l’avenir : elle l’écrase. Elle n’offre plus de cadre pour penser : elle interdit de penser autrement. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque le récit historique est univoque, sanctuarisé, imposé comme vérité indiscutable. Toute relecture tend alors à être suspectée de déloyauté. L’arcalité y devient clôture du passé et justification du présent, empêchant toute transmission vivante, critique et conflictuelle. - -#### **Corollaire VI : La scène définie par l’héritage devient fermeture** - -Il ne suffit pas qu’un ordre accepte la confrontation : encore faut-il que cette confrontation ne soit pas entièrement prédéfinie par les formes héritées. Car une scène, aussi ouverte en apparence soit-elle, peut être subrepticement configurée par l’*arcalité* dominante, de telle manière que tout ce qui s’y joue soit déjà encadré, déjà canalisé, déjà absorbé, préfiguré. Lorsque le cadre de l’archicration est déterminé en amont par les formes héritées de l’ordre, alors le dissensus devient simulation, la conflictualité devient spectacle, et la contestation est neutralisée avant même de paraître. - -On rencontre ici une forme de préemption institutionnelle : un lieu est bien accordé au désaccord, mais ce lieu est assigné, ritualisé, domestiqué. La conflictualité devient alors un épisode cadré plutôt qu’un processus susceptible de reconfigurer la scène elle-même. C’est le débat encadré, la controverse organisée, la participation scénarisée — autant de formes de *pseudo-archicration* qui reconduisent l’*arcalité* sous les habits du dialogue. Comme l’a formulé Judith Butler dans *Frames of War* (2009), les cadres institués définissent en amont les conditions de visibilité du conflit. Ce n’est pas la scène qui est neutre, mais son cadrage, son lexique et sa syntaxe de recevabilité. - -Cette fermeture scénique par l’héritage prend plusieurs formes : - -D’abord *juridique*, lorsque les modalités du dissensus sont verrouillées par des cadres légaux figés, des procédures non révisables, ou des coûts d’accès exorbitants. Ce n’est pas la voix qui est interdite, c’est l’accès au cadre de formulation et d’interpellation qui est alors barré. - -Ensuite *discursive*, lorsque le langage même du dissensus est formaté par les termes imposés par l’*arcalité*. L’on débat, certes, mais à l’intérieur d’un lexique saturé, d’un cadre narratif imposé, d’une dramaturgie préécrite. L’*arcalité* devient alors grammaire de l’acceptable, rendant toute parole réellement divergente inaudible, illisible voire risible, car perçue hors champ. - -Enfin *institutionnelle*, lorsque les organes de contestation — conseils, assemblées, tribunaux, plateformes — sont eux-mêmes issus d’une *arcalité* non interrogée. On feint l’ouverture, mais dans des dispositifs qui reconduisent les hiérarchies symboliques et les exclusions initiales. Le conflit y est accepté, mais seulement dans la forme qu’on lui a déjà assignée. - -Ainsi, même une *archicration* active peut devenir contre-productive si elle est intégralement cadrée par une *arcalité* dominante. L’institution du litige ne suffit pas ; il faut que cette institution elle-même soit ouverte à sa propre reconfiguration. Comme le souligne Ernesto Laclau (*La raison populiste*, 2005), toute hégémonie se fonde sur l’institutionnalisation d’un certain partage du sensible — c’est-à-dire sur l’invisibilisation de tout ce qui n’entre pas dans le cadre défini. Ce que l’on ne voit pas, ce que l’on n’entend pas, ce que l’on ne nomme pas : voilà ce que la scène figée interdit par omission. - -La véritable *archicration* exige donc une plasticité scénique, une capacité à refonder les lieux mêmes du conflit, et non uniquement à distribuer des prises de parole à l’intérieur d’un théâtre déjà construit. Cela implique que l’*arcalité* n’ait pas autorité sur les formes mêmes du formulable, qu’elle ne définisse pas a priori ce qu’est un litige recevable, ce qu’est une parole fondée, ce qu’est un interlocuteur légitime. - -Un exemple contemporain de cette dynamique est observable dans certaines consultations dites « citoyennes », où l’on simule l’ouverture démocratique tout en imposant les termes du débat, les formats d’intervention, les conclusions possibles. Le dissensus est mimé, absorbé, puis recyclé dans les logiques de l’institution. On n’écoute que ce qui est déjà attendu. L’archicration devient alors un rituel de compensation : elle donne l’apparence d’une régulation ouverte sans produire d’effets à la hauteur de ce qu’elle met en scène. - -C’est ici que l’*archicratie* se distingue radicalement des régimes qui tolèrent le conflit sans l’instituer. Elle exige non seulement la présence d’une scène, mais la révision constante de ses formes. L’arène *archicratique* ne peut être définie une fois pour toutes par héritage : elle doit être traversable, réouvrable, capable d’accueillir les formes de parole qui ne lui sont pas familières, voire hostiles. Sans cette exigence, l’*archicration* devient façade, la tension se mue en décor, la contradiction est jouée, mais non écoutée. Et dès lors, le régime tout entier peut se prétendre régulé, alors qu’il est seulement stabilisé par exclusion. - -Le test d’archicraticité est donc ici redoutable : *la scène est-elle réellement ouverte, ou seulement tolérante ?* *Les formes de contestation sont-elles co-instituées, ou simplement autorisées ?* *Peut-on contester les contours mêmes de la scène — ou est-ce là déjà une transgression ?* - -À ces questions, une archicratie digne de ce nom ne peut répondre qu’en acceptant que les contours mêmes de sa scène demeurent révisables. Car une scène figée par l’arcalité devient incapable d’accueillir une transformation effective du conflit. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque les formes de contestation sont entièrement prédéfinies par les cadres hérités, rendant impossible la remise en cause des modalités mêmes du dissensus. La scène est ouverte en apparence, mais verrouillée dans sa grammaire, ses seuils, ses formats et ses interlocuteurs légitimes. - -#### **Vers une grammaire d’épreuve, de tension et de vigilance** - -Ce que révèlent, en leur ensemble, les six corollaires que nous venons d’exposer ne se résume pas en un faisceau d’avertissements doctrinaux. Ils composent, bien plus radicalement, la grammaire minimale de viabilité d’un *régime archicratique*. Chacun d’eux, pris isolément, désigne une pente, un risque, un seuil critique à ne pas franchir : l’*arcalité* sans relecture devient injonction, la *cratialité* sans épreuve devient empêchement, l’*archicration* sans seuil devient simulacre, la critique ritualisée devient neutralisation, l’histoire monopolisée devient instrument de légitimation et la situation héritée devient fermeture préemptive. Mais pris ensemble, ces corollaires configurent une exigence active, une vigilance transversale, un protocole opératoire pour toute entité prétendant au statut d’ordre archicratique. - -Il ne s’agit pas, ici, de multiplier des conditions normatives abstraites, mais de poser les critères concrets d’une configuration viable, testable, traversable, non falsifiée par son propre dispositif. En d’autres termes, chaque corollaire constitue une faille potentielle, une zone de capture, un point d’achoppement du paradigme — là où l’un des trois pôles fondamentaux (*arcalité*, *cratialité*, *archicration*) pourrait prendre le pas sur les autres, subvertir la tenségrité, dérober à la structure sa capacité de remise en tension. - -La force du paradigme archicratique ne réside pas dans une stabilité formelle, mais dans sa capacité à se réajuster par mise en tension, à demeurer viable dans l’instabilité et à se recomposer à travers les différends qu’il rend possibles. Il n’est pas un modèle d’équilibre idéal, mais une forme de viabilité dynamique, constamment remise en jeu par les conflits qu’il institue. - -Ces six corollaires ne valent donc pas simplement comme garde-fous : ils constituent les principaux révélateurs internes du régime archicratique, les points de retournement où la structure révèle sa santé critique ou son dérèglement fonctionnel. Un régime n’est pas archicratique par proclamation : il l’est à condition que chacun de ces corollaires puisse être mis en test, mis en visibilité, mis en épreuve. - -C’est en ce sens que l’archicratie peut être dite falsifiable : non dans un sens strictement poppérien, mais comme configuration exposée à la possibilité de sa propre mise en défaut dans des scènes situées d’épreuve et de contestation. Car ce que ces corollaires mettent au jour, c’est l’impossibilité pour le paradigme archicratique de fonctionner sans tension critique. Toute tentative de clôture, de saturation, de captation ou d’auto-immunisation constitue la signature d’un effondrement de son principe même. - -Les corollaires peuvent alors être formulés de manière resserrée. Une *arcalité* non revisitée n’est pas neutre : elle est injonctive. Une *cratialité* non éprouvée n’est pas efficace : elle est mutilante. Ce qui se prétend *archicration* sans scène formée n’est pas ouvert : c’est un dispositif impraticable. Une critique ritualisée n’est pas dissensuelle : elle est décorative. Une histoire monopolisée n’est pas mémoire : elle est légitimation autoritaire. Un dispositif verrouillé par héritage n’est pas conflictuel : c’est un verrou symbolique. - -En dernière instance, ces corollaires dessinent une morphogenèse critique du politique. Ils permettent de détecter les mutations, les pathologies, les points de durcissement du régime — et d’en extraire les conditions d’un réagencement toujours possible. Ils empêchent surtout de reconduire l’archicratie en doctrine close, en la maintenant dans une fonction de vigilance structurée. - -L’archicratie ne se définit donc ni par l’équilibre parfait ni par la clôture des controverses. Elle se soutient dans la capacité à exposer ses tensions, à traiter ses différends et à demeurer révisable sans perdre toute consistance. C’est dans cette exigence de traversée critique et de viabilité sans garantie que réside la portée épistémique et politique du paradigme. - -La traversée accomplie dans cette section permet désormais de formuler avec davantage de netteté ce qui, jusqu’ici, ne se laissait entrevoir qu’à l’état dispersé dans les doctrines, les scènes et les diagnostics rencontrés. L’archicratie n’apparaît plus seulement comme une hypothèse interprétative commode, ni comme une simple reformulation des tensions déjà connues du politique ; elle prend la forme plus exigeante d’un paradigme de lisibilité et d’épreuve, capable de rapporter à une même structure les conditions sous lesquelles un ordre peut durer, agir et se laisser contester sans se dissoudre ni se pétrifier. Ce que cette section a donc cherché à établir, ce n’est pas la supériorité abstraite d’un vocabulaire nouveau, mais la nécessité d’une grammaire apte à penser ensemble ce que les grandes pensées de la régulation, le plus souvent, dissocient, hiérarchisent ou laissent s’absorber l’un dans l’autre. - -De ce point de vue, le triptyque arcalité, cratialité, archicration ne vaut ni comme taxinomie close, ni comme schème doctrinal à imposer aux réalités qu’il prétend éclairer. Il vaut comme structure minimale d’intelligibilité, c’est-à-dire comme opérateur permettant de saisir qu’aucun régime n’est viable s’il ne parvient, d’une manière ou d’une autre, à articuler une mémoire instituante, une capacité d’effectuation et une scène de mise à l’épreuve. Dès que l’une de ces dimensions prétend valoir pour le tout, le régime commence à dériver : l’héritage se fige en injonction, la puissance se ferme en empêchement, la scène se vide en simulacre. L’intérêt du paradigme archicratique est précisément de rendre ces dérives repérables sans postuler pour autant l’existence d’une formule idéale de leur équilibre. Il ne promet pas une harmonie ; il rend pensable une tenue sous tension. - -C’est pourquoi la tenségrité, ici mobilisée avec précaution, n’intervient pas comme image décorative, mais comme opérateur de rigueur. Elle permet de penser que la viabilité d’un ordre n’est pas celle d’un édifice immobile, mais celle d’une structure qui ne tient qu’en supportant des contraintes hétérogènes, en absorbant des variations, en laissant jouer des reprises. Sous cet angle, la régulation n’est jamais donnée une fois pour toutes ; elle est toujours l’affaire d’un réajustement, d’une vigilance, d’une exposition renouvelée des prises qui composent un monde commun. L’archicratie ne nomme donc pas un état de perfection politique ; elle désigne la condition sous laquelle un régime peut demeurer transformable sans perdre toute consistance, et consistant sans devenir indisponible à sa propre critique. - -Les six corollaires dégagés plus haut précisent alors la portée concrète de cette proposition. Ils montrent que le paradigme ne vaut qu’à la condition d’accepter sa propre vulnérabilité : il n’y a d’archicratie qu’exposée à la possibilité de son échec, c’est-à-dire à la possibilité que l’un de ses pôles absorbe les autres, que la tension cesse d’être soutenue, que la scène soit neutralisée ou que la mémoire soit instrumentalisée. En ce sens, la force du paradigme tient moins à une prétention totalisante qu’à sa capacité d’organiser une vigilance réglée sur les formes de capture, de rigidification et d’auto-immunisation qui menacent toute structure régulatrice. Il ne dit pas ce qu’un ordre doit être en général ; il aide à discerner ce qui, dans un ordre donné, commence à ne plus pouvoir être repris, contesté ou reconfiguré. - -Dès lors, l’enjeu n’est pas spéculatif. Si cette section a atteint son but, elle laisse apparaître que l’archicratie ne pourra être tenue pour recevable qu’à condition d’entrer dans l’épreuve des cas, des dispositifs, des trajectoires historiques et des montages institutionnels effectifs. Il ne suffira pas qu’elle soit conceptuellement cohérente ; il faudra encore qu’elle permette de mieux lire des configurations concrètes, d’identifier leurs points de bascule, de comparer leurs formes de viabilité, et de faire apparaître, avec plus de précision qu’auparavant, les moments où un régime se ferme, se dérègle ou se recompose. C’est seulement à ce prix qu’un paradigme cesse d’être une architecture intellectuelle séduisante pour devenir un véritable instrument de discernement. - -Ainsi, la clausule de 3.8 ne ferme pas la réflexion ; elle en déplace l’exigence. Elle marque le point où l’archicratie cesse d’être seulement déduite des pensées traversées pour devoir répondre de sa propre puissance d’éclairage. Ce déplacement est décisif : il signifie que le paradigme n’a désormais plus pour tâche première de se dire, mais de se mesurer. Non de s’abriter dans la généralité du concept, mais d’affronter la rugosité des mondes historiques où mémoire, puissance et scène se nouent, se contredisent, se bloquent ou s’ajustent. C’est dans cet affrontement seulement qu’il pourra être établi si l’archicratie constitue bien une grammaire robuste de la co-viabilité, ou si elle doit encore être corrigée par ce qu’elle prétend rendre lisible. - -Sous cette réserve — qui est aussi sa condition de probité —, l’hypothèse archicratique peut désormais être tenue pour suffisamment formée pour affronter la suite. Non comme vérité acquise, mais comme instrument de lecture sous contrainte ; non comme doctrine close, mais comme structure révisable d’intelligibilité ; non comme promesse d’ordre, mais comme exigence de composition entre ce qui hérite, ce qui agit et ce qui s’expose à l’épreuve. La suite du travail devra donc montrer, en situation, ce que vaut réellement cette promesse de discernement. Car une pensée de la régulation n’atteint sa pleine légitimité qu’au moment où elle s’éprouve dans les mondes qu’elle prétend éclairer. - -## **Conclusion du chapitre 3 — Pour une grammaire critique des régimes régulateurs : l’épreuve paradigmatique de l’archicration** - -117. Ce chapitre n’avait pas pour fin d’ajouter un concept de plus à l’arsenal des théories du politique, mais de dégager les conditions de lisibilité d’un régime de régulation encore insuffisamment thématisé comme tel. À travers l’élucidation de l’arcalité, de la cratialité et de l’archicration, il ne s’agissait pas de proposer une doctrine nouvelle, mais de rendre intelligible une structure de co-viabilité sans laquelle aucune tenue politique ne peut durablement se soutenir. - -Ce qui se trouve désormais acquis, ce n’est pas un modèle idéal, mais une grammaire. Une grammaire de tensions, de co-contraintes et de reprises, qui permet de reconnaître ce qui, dans un ordre donné, relève encore d’un régime archicratique et ce qui, déjà, s’en écarte. L’archicratie ne désigne donc pas une forme politique parmi d’autres, mais une condition de viabilité régulatrice : celle par laquelle un ordre peut durer sans se figer, agir sans s’auto-immuniser, et se contester sans se dissoudre. - -Le gain propre de ce chapitre tient moins à l’invention d’un vocabulaire qu’à la stabilisation d’un critère. En articulant arcalité, cratialité et archicration dans une tenségrité évolutive, il devient possible de distinguer ce qui relève d’une régulation vivante de ce qui procède déjà de la clôture, de la neutralisation ou de la capture. Il permet de discerner comment il tient, où il se dérègle, et selon quelles modalités il peut encore être repris. - -Une telle clarification n’épuise nullement la question du politique ; elle en déplace plutôt l’exigence. Ce chapitre ne prétend ni fournir une théorie exhaustive du pouvoir, ni clore la typologie des régimes. Il n’avait pas davantage pour objet d’évaluer empiriquement des configurations historiques ou contemporaines. - -Il faut même préciser davantage la portée de ce résultat. L’archicratie ne se présente pas comme la vérité ultime des philosophies politiques, mais comme un opérateur critique de discernement. Elle ne vient ni annuler les cadres antérieurs, ni les reléguer à l’erreur, mais éprouver ce qu’ils laissent dans l’ombre lorsqu’ils surinvestissent un registre unique de la régulation. Sa légitimité ne tient donc pas à une prétention hégémonique ; elle tient à sa capacité de produire, cas par cas, des distinctions plus fines entre ce qui fonde, ce qui agit et ce qui se laisse reprendre. - -Ce qu’il établit, en revanche, ce sont les conditions minimales d’une épreuve possible : les seuils, les tensions et les scènes à partir desquels un ordre pourra être interrogé dans sa capacité à demeurer transformable. - -Ce qui a été stabilisé ici appelle désormais autre chose qu’une simple reconduction théorique. Non pour être confirmé de l’extérieur, mais pour être exposé à ses propres exigences. C’est à ce point que l’élaboration conceptuelle rencontre sa limite féconde, et que commence la nécessité d’une mise à l’épreuve plus directe dans les configurations concrètes où se jouent, se nouent et se dénouent les tensions constitutives d’un monde commun. +Il ne suffit pas que la critique soit autorisée. Encore faut-il qu'elle +puisse produire des effets, déplacer des prises et ouvrir une +possibilité réelle de reconfiguration du régime qu'elle vise. Car il +existe des configurations où la critique est tolérée, voire mise en +scène, non pour être entendue, mais pour être absorbée, vidée de son +tranchant, reléguée à un rôle d'ornement démocratique. + +La critique alors ne fait plus trembler l'édifice : elle circule comme +fonction régulée, comme assignation rituelle, comme soupape inoffensive +d'un ordre qui a appris à mimer sa propre contestation pour mieux la +disqualifier. + +Tel est le paradoxe : une archicration peut exister en apparence — tribunes ouvertes, consultations publiques, procédures participatives — sans que jamais ses effets débordent le cadre conflictuel qui les +accueille. On y écoute des oppositions. On les laisse s'exprimer. Puis +l'on passe à autre chose. La contradiction est ritualisée, encadrée, +neutralisée. Elle se matérialise alors comme forme vide. + +Cette désactivation symbolique par ritualisation opère selon plusieurs +modalités. D'abord, la segmentation cloisonne les espaces de controverse +et empêche leurs résonances systémiques. Ensuite, la temporisation +assigne la confrontation à des moments spécifiques — consultations +fermées, cycles de débat, séquences balisées — et la rend périodique +plutôt que structurellement active. Enfin, la spectacularisation exhibe +la critique sans la traiter au fond, en la convertissant en signe +d'ouverture plutôt qu'en véritable épreuve. + +Ce processus a été théorisé, entre autres, par Boltanski et Chiapello +dans *Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme* (1999) : le pouvoir contemporain +se nourrit de la critique pour se réinventer sans jamais se remettre en +question. Il intègre les formes du dissensus tout en tentant d'en +épuiser la portée : les objections deviennent commentaires, les +résistances deviennent « suggestions », les conflits deviennent flux à +modérer. De manière convergente, Nancy Fraser (*Scales of Justice*, +2009) alerte sur la transformation de la critique en ressource de +valorisation dans les régimes d'hégémonie néo-libérale, où le dissensus +devient contenu dans un théâtre de légitimation. + +Dans une telle configuration, l'*archicration* est présente, mais +dysfonctionnelle. Elle existe comme décor de légitimité, non comme +espace de transformation. La forme y remplace l'effet. L'accès y déplace +la puissance. L'expression y dissimule l'absence d'impact. + +Ce corollaire nous oblige à aller au-delà du simple critère de présence +d'une scène de contestation. Il ne suffit pas que les voies +d'interpellation soient ouvertes : il faut encore que leurs effets +soient possibles. Il faut que la critique puisse engendrer un +déplacement réel, une inflexion, une reconfiguration. + +Cela implique qu'une parole critique vivante ne soit pas entièrement +prévisible dans ses effets : une *archicration* vivante ne peut être +entièrement prédite, ni parfaitement contenue. Elle doit comporter une +part d'indétermination constitutive, une capacité à submerger les +protocoles qui la soutiennent. En d'autres termes : si la scène de +contestation ne peut jamais faire vaciller l'ordre qu'elle traverse, +alors elle ne conteste plus rien. Elle n'opère plus comme véritable mise +à l'épreuve. + +On observe cette dérive dans nombre d'instances contemporaines : +commissions d'éthique adossées à des décisions déjà actées ; conventions +citoyennes dont les rapports restent lettres mortes ; consultations +publiques ignorées dans les arbitrages ; assemblées délibératives +incapables d'exercer une quelconque effectuation. + +Le langage critique y est prélevé, recyclé, instrumentalisé comme +ressource d'acceptabilité sociale. Il devient un marqueur de conformité +plus qu'un opérateur de tension. Il rassure, il donne l'illusion de la +dispute, mais ne déplace rien. Ce n'est plus une mise en tension mais un +trompe-l'œil régulateur. + +Dès lors, le critère n'est pas l'existence d'une critique, mais sa +puissance de transformation. Une critique est archicratique non quand +elle est autorisée, mais quand elle est audible, recevable, traitable, +potentiellement efficace — même partiellement, même sous +conflictualité. + +Telle est l'exigence du paradigme archicratique : rendre visibles les +espaces où la critique est mise en scène sans être véritablement +traitée, où l'interpellation est permise sans prise effective, et où +l'objection est contenue comme rôle toléré plutôt que reçue comme force +de transformation. + +Le rituel critique devient alors le lieu d'une déresponsabilisation du +pouvoir : « vous avez eu la parole, vous avez été entendus » — mais +aucune transformation n'est permise, ni même envisagée. L'ordre +s'immunise par la répétition du dissensus. + +Ce que ce corollaire révèle, c'est que l'*archicration* ne saurait être +confondue avec la possibilité abstraite de contester. Elle n'existe qu'à +condition de menacer — au moins virtuellement — la forme actuelle du +pouvoir institué. Une critique qui ne fait courir aucun risque, fût-il +limité, à l'ordre institué ne relève plus pleinement de l'archicration ; +elle tend à devenir un dispositif de canalisation du dissensus plutôt +qu'une véritable mise à l'épreuve. + +C'est pourquoi la critique ritualisée, privée de relais effectifs, +devient moins un opérateur de transformation qu'un dispositif de +neutralisation du litige sous apparence d'ouverture démocratique. + +En ce sens, l'*archicration* exige une scène traversable — c'est-à-dire capable d'opérer une translation, une transmission, une +mutation effective. La critique, pour être légitime, doit pouvoir +changer quelque chose. Fût-ce à la marge, fût-ce par déplacement +latéral, fût-ce dans la longue temporalité. Faute de quoi, elle cesse +d'opérer comme critique : elle devient accompagnement, apaisement ou +simple décor de légitimation. + +Le *paradigme archicratique*, à ce stade, pose donc un critère clair : +un régime qui met en scène la critique sans lui permettre d'agir — même partiellement — n'est pas archicratique. Il est factuellement +autoritaire, même sous apparence délibérative. Un ordre échoue à ce test +lorsque les dispositifs de critique sont formellement tolérés mais sans +aucun impact possible sur les décisions, les normes ou les structures. +La contestation y est encadrée, segmentée, absorbée comme mise en scène +sans transformation. Elle joue son rôle, mais ne déplace rien. + +#### **Corollaire V : L'histoire monopolisée devient arme de légitimation** + +Toute *arcalité*, pour être légitime, doit rester ouverte à +l'interprétation, à la controverse, à la pluralité de ses récits. +Lorsqu'elle se fige en histoire officielle, lorsqu'elle s'énonce sans +pluralisation des voix, lorsqu'elle s'impose comme mémoire unique, elle +cesse d'instituer pour commencer à justifier. Elle ne donne plus de +raisons au lien social, mais le naturalise a posteriori. + +Ce phénomène est bien connu des régimes autoritaires où les éléments du +passé deviennent arguments, non plus terrains d'enquêtes. Il sert alors +à couvrir le présent d'un vernis de continuité, à armer les décisions +présentes d'un crédit ancestral, à légitimer la domination comme +prolongement "naturel" d'un récit historique incontestable. Toute +contestation devient dès lors trahison de l'héritage, faute contre la +mémoire, offense aux ancêtres voire hérésie contre l'ordre reçu. + +Une telle monopolisation de l'histoire transforme alors l'arcalité en +instrument de verrouillage symbolique. C'est ce que Michel-Rolph +Trouillot a magistralement mis en exergue dans *Silencing the Past* +(1995). L'histoire selon lui n'est jamais neutre ; elle est toujours le +résultat de silences produits, de choix opérés, de voix effacées. De +sorte que lorsqu'un seul récit prévaut, l'histoire cesse d'être un +vecteur de transmission et devient une machinerie de légitimation. Cette +critique de l'histoire comme outil de verrouillage est également +présente chez Michel de Certeau (*L'écriture de l'histoire*, 1975), qui +montre comment l'autorité historique se construit souvent par effacement +des marges et des écarts. + +La dérive est double : d'une part, l'histoire est mobilisée comme corpus +clos, achevé, indiscutable. Le passé devient archive sacrée, +intouchable, non révisable — et donc non transmissible autrement que +par répétition ; d'autre part, l'autorité actuelle se fonde sur cette +histoire, la cite, l'invoque, la mime pour se consolider, en +disqualifiant toute relecture comme menace, tout réexamen comme +révisionnisme déloyal. + +C'est là que l'*arcalité*, au lieu de jouer son rôle structurant, +bascule dans la stratégie. Elle ne représente plus ce qui donne cadre, +repère, intelligibilité et continuité, mais se transforme en ce qui +arme, protège, légitime et neutralise. + +Or une *archicratie*, pour être viable, ne peut tolérer cette fermeture. +Elle suppose au contraire une *arcalité* interprétable, critiquable, +révisable, c'est-à-dire mise en tension par une *archicration* active. +Le passé n'y est pas sanctifié, mais revisité à partir des conflits +qu'il génère et des pièces et éléments nouveaux que les historiens +soumettent à leurs pairs et à la société. La mémoire y est plurielle, +exposée, parfois litigieuse, mais justement parce qu'elle reste vivante, +activable, discutable. + +C'est toute la différence entre une *arcalité narrative* — faite +d'histoires ouvertes, stratifiées, falsifiables — et une *arcalité +doctrinaire*, faite d'une seule histoire, close, imposée. Là où +l'*archicration* est vivante, le passé est une arène de confrontation. +Là où elle est absente, le passé devient objet de révérence, outil de +propagande ou argument d'autorité. + +Des États-nations en guerre aux gouvernements populistes, des traditions +religieuses institutionnalisées à certaines formes contemporaines de +néo-conservatisme, les exemples abondent d'une mobilisation stratégique +de l'histoire où une mémoire mythifiée sert à fermer le présent à toute +transformation. Les archives, les monuments et les commémorations +cessent alors d'être des supports de travail critique pour devenir des +instruments de stabilisation symbolique. + +Mais cette monopolisation n'est pas toujours explicite : elle peut être +douce, insidieuse, managériale. On la retrouve dans les politiques +mémorielles contemporaines qui produisent des narrations clés en main, +normées, aseptisées, conçues pour pacifier le dissensus et aligner les +subjectivités sur un récit consensuel. Le passé y est alors administré +comme un récit d'alignement, sous contrôle des formats, des sélections +et des usages légitimes. + +Ce corollaire rappelle donc une exigence fondatrice : toute *arcalité* +légitime est plurielle. Elle doit pouvoir être réinterprétée sans que +cela soit perçu comme une subversion. Elle doit pouvoir être contestée, +recontextualisée, traversée par les conflits sans se déliter. C'est +cette capacité à supporter le désaccord que l'*archicration* doit +garantir. + +En définitive, un régime n'est archicratique que si son rapport au passé +est réversible, transmissible, disputable. Si l'histoire y devient +ressource de domination, alors l'*arcalité* s'est retournée contre +elle-même. Elle n'ouvre plus l'avenir : elle l'écrase. Elle n'offre plus +de cadre pour penser : elle interdit de penser autrement. Un ordre +échoue à ce test lorsque le récit historique est univoque, sanctuarisé, +imposé comme vérité indiscutable. Toute relecture tend alors à être +suspectée de déloyauté. L'arcalité y devient clôture du passé et +justification du présent, empêchant toute transmission vivante, critique +et conflictuelle. + +#### **Corollaire VI : La scène définie par l'héritage devient fermeture** + +Il ne suffit pas qu'un ordre accepte la confrontation : encore faut-il +que cette confrontation ne soit pas entièrement prédéfinie par les +formes héritées. Car une scène, aussi ouverte en apparence soit-elle, +peut être subrepticement configurée par l'*arcalité* dominante, de telle +manière que tout ce qui s'y joue soit déjà encadré, déjà canalisé, déjà +absorbé, préfiguré. Lorsque le cadre de l'archicration est déterminé en +amont par les formes héritées de l'ordre, alors le dissensus devient +simulation, la conflictualité devient spectacle, et la contestation est +neutralisée avant même de paraître. + +On rencontre ici une forme de préemption institutionnelle : un lieu est +bien accordé au désaccord, mais ce lieu est assigné, ritualisé, +domestiqué. La conflictualité devient alors un épisode cadré plutôt +qu'un processus susceptible de reconfigurer la scène elle-même. C'est le +débat encadré, la controverse organisée, la participation scénarisée — autant de formes de *pseudo-archicration* qui reconduisent l'*arcalité* +sous les habits du dialogue. Comme l'a formulé Judith Butler dans +*Frames of War* (2009), les cadres institués définissent en amont les +conditions de visibilité du conflit. Ce n'est pas la scène qui est +neutre, mais son cadrage, son lexique et sa syntaxe de recevabilité. + +Cette fermeture scénique par l'héritage prend plusieurs formes : + +D'abord *juridique*, lorsque les modalités du dissensus sont +verrouillées par des cadres légaux figés, des procédures non révisables, +ou des coûts d'accès exorbitants. Ce n'est pas la voix qui est +interdite, c'est l'accès au cadre de formulation et d'interpellation qui +est alors barré. + +Ensuite *discursive*, lorsque le langage même du dissensus est formaté +par les termes imposés par l'*arcalité*. L'on débat, certes, mais à +l'intérieur d'un lexique saturé, d'un cadre narratif imposé, d'une +dramaturgie préécrite. L'*arcalité* devient alors grammaire de +l'acceptable, rendant toute parole réellement divergente inaudible, +illisible voire risible, car perçue hors champ. + +Enfin *institutionnelle*, lorsque les organes de contestation — conseils, assemblées, tribunaux, plateformes — sont eux-mêmes issus +d'une *arcalité* non interrogée. On feint l'ouverture, mais dans des +dispositifs qui reconduisent les hiérarchies symboliques et les +exclusions initiales. Le conflit y est accepté, mais seulement dans la +forme qu'on lui a déjà assignée. + +Ainsi, même une *archicration* active peut devenir contre-productive si +elle est intégralement cadrée par une *arcalité* dominante. +L'institution du litige ne suffit pas ; il faut que cette institution +elle-même soit ouverte à sa propre reconfiguration. Comme le souligne +Ernesto Laclau (*La raison populiste*, 2005), toute hégémonie se fonde +sur l'institutionnalisation d'un certain partage du sensible — c'est-à-dire sur l'invisibilisation de tout ce qui n'entre pas dans le +cadre défini. Ce que l'on ne voit pas, ce que l'on n'entend pas, ce que +l'on ne nomme pas : voilà ce que la scène figée interdit par omission. + +La véritable *archicration* exige donc une plasticité scénique, une +capacité à refonder les lieux mêmes du conflit, et non uniquement à +distribuer des prises de parole à l'intérieur d'un théâtre déjà +construit. Cela implique que l'*arcalité* n'ait pas autorité sur les +formes mêmes du formulable, qu'elle ne définisse pas a priori ce qu'est +un litige recevable, ce qu'est une parole fondée, ce qu'est un +interlocuteur légitime. + +Un exemple contemporain de cette dynamique est observable dans certaines +consultations dites « citoyennes », où l'on simule l'ouverture +démocratique tout en imposant les termes du débat, les formats +d'intervention, les conclusions possibles. Le dissensus est mimé, +absorbé, puis recyclé dans les logiques de l'institution. On n'écoute +que ce qui est déjà attendu. L'archicration devient alors un rituel de +compensation : elle donne l'apparence d'une régulation ouverte sans +produire d'effets à la hauteur de ce qu'elle met en scène. + +C'est ici que l'*archicratie* se distingue radicalement des régimes qui +tolèrent le conflit sans l'instituer. Elle exige non seulement la +présence d'une scène, mais la révision constante de ses formes. L'arène +*archicratique* ne peut être définie une fois pour toutes par héritage : +elle doit être traversable, réouvrable, capable d'accueillir les formes +de parole qui ne lui sont pas familières, voire hostiles. Sans cette +exigence, l'*archicration* devient façade, la tension se mue en décor, +la contradiction est jouée, mais non écoutée. Et dès lors, le régime +tout entier peut se prétendre régulé, alors qu'il est seulement +stabilisé par exclusion. + +Le test d'archicraticité est donc ici redoutable : *la scène est-elle +réellement ouverte, ou seulement tolérante ?* *Les formes de +contestation sont-elles co-instituées, ou simplement autorisées ?* +*Peut-on contester les contours mêmes de la scène — ou est-ce là déjà +une transgression ?* + +À ces questions, une archicratie digne de ce nom ne peut répondre qu'en +acceptant que les contours mêmes de sa scène demeurent révisables. Car +une scène figée par l'arcalité devient incapable d'accueillir une +transformation effective du conflit. Un ordre échoue à ce test lorsque +les formes de contestation sont entièrement prédéfinies par les cadres +hérités, rendant impossible la remise en cause des modalités mêmes du +dissensus. La scène est ouverte en apparence, mais verrouillée dans sa +grammaire, ses seuils, ses formats et ses interlocuteurs légitimes. + +#### **Vers une grammaire d'épreuve, de tension et de vigilance** + +Ce que révèlent, en leur ensemble, les six corollaires que nous venons +d'exposer ne se résume pas en un faisceau d'avertissements doctrinaux. +Ils composent, bien plus radicalement, la grammaire minimale de +viabilité d'un *régime archicratique*. Chacun d'eux, pris isolément, +désigne une pente, un risque, un seuil critique à ne pas franchir : +l'*arcalité* sans relecture devient injonction, la *cratialité* sans +épreuve devient empêchement, l'*archicration* sans seuil devient +simulacre, la critique ritualisée devient neutralisation, l'histoire +monopolisée devient instrument de légitimation et la situation héritée +devient fermeture préemptive. Mais pris ensemble, ces corollaires +configurent une exigence active, une vigilance transversale, un +protocole opératoire pour toute entité prétendant au statut d'ordre +archicratique. + +Il ne s'agit pas, ici, de multiplier des conditions normatives +abstraites, mais de poser les critères concrets d'une configuration +viable, testable, traversable, non falsifiée par son propre dispositif. +En d'autres termes, chaque corollaire constitue une faille potentielle, +une zone de capture, un point d'achoppement du paradigme — là où l'un +des trois pôles fondamentaux (*arcalité*, *cratialité*, *archicration*) +pourrait prendre le pas sur les autres, subvertir la tenségrité, dérober +à la structure sa capacité de remise en tension. + +La force du paradigme archicratique ne réside pas dans une stabilité +formelle, mais dans sa capacité à se réajuster par mise en tension, à +demeurer viable dans l'instabilité et à se recomposer à travers les +différends qu'il rend possibles. Il n'est pas un modèle d'équilibre +idéal, mais une forme de viabilité dynamique, constamment remise en jeu +par les conflits qu'il institue. + +Ces six corollaires ne valent donc pas simplement comme garde-fous : ils +constituent les principaux révélateurs internes du régime archicratique, +les points de retournement où la structure révèle sa santé critique ou +son dérèglement fonctionnel. Un régime n'est pas archicratique par +proclamation : il l'est à condition que chacun de ces corollaires puisse +être mis en test, mis en visibilité, mis en épreuve. + +C'est en ce sens que l'archicratie peut être dite falsifiable : non dans +un sens strictement poppérien, mais comme configuration exposée à la +possibilité de sa propre mise en défaut dans des scènes situées +d'épreuve et de contestation. Car ce que ces corollaires mettent au +jour, c'est l'impossibilité pour le paradigme archicratique de +fonctionner sans tension critique. Toute tentative de clôture, de +saturation, de captation ou d'auto-immunisation constitue la signature +d'un effondrement de son principe même. + +Les corollaires peuvent alors être formulés de manière resserrée. Une +*arcalité* non revisitée n'est pas neutre : elle est injonctive. Une +*cratialité* non éprouvée n'est pas efficace : elle est mutilante. Ce +qui se prétend *archicration* sans scène formée n'est pas ouvert : c'est +un dispositif impraticable. Une critique ritualisée n'est pas +dissensuelle : elle est décorative. Une histoire monopolisée n'est pas +mémoire : elle est légitimation autoritaire. Un dispositif verrouillé +par héritage n'est pas conflictuel : c'est un verrou symbolique. + +En dernière instance, ces corollaires dessinent une morphogenèse +critique du politique. Ils permettent de détecter les mutations, les +pathologies, les points de durcissement du régime — et d'en extraire +les conditions d'un réagencement toujours possible. Ils empêchent +surtout de reconduire l'archicratie en doctrine close, en la maintenant +dans une fonction de vigilance structurée. + +L'archicratie ne se définit donc ni par l'équilibre parfait ni par la +clôture des controverses. Elle se soutient dans la capacité à exposer +ses tensions, à traiter ses différends et à demeurer révisable sans +perdre toute consistance. C'est dans cette exigence de traversée +critique et de viabilité sans garantie que réside la portée épistémique +et politique du paradigme. + +La traversée accomplie dans cette section permet désormais de formuler +avec davantage de netteté ce qui, jusqu'ici, ne se laissait entrevoir +qu'à l'état dispersé dans les doctrines, les scènes et les diagnostics +rencontrés. L'archicratie n'apparaît plus seulement comme une hypothèse +interprétative commode, ni comme une simple reformulation des tensions +déjà connues du politique ; elle prend la forme plus exigeante d'un +paradigme de lisibilité et d'épreuve, capable de rapporter à une même +structure les conditions sous lesquelles un ordre peut durer, agir et se +laisser contester sans se dissoudre ni se pétrifier. Ce que cette +section a donc cherché à établir, ce n'est pas la supériorité abstraite +d'un vocabulaire nouveau, mais la nécessité d'une grammaire apte à +penser ensemble ce que les grandes pensées de la régulation, le plus +souvent, dissocient, hiérarchisent ou laissent s'absorber l'un dans +l'autre. + +De ce point de vue, le triptyque arcalité, cratialité, archicration ne +vaut ni comme taxinomie close, ni comme schème doctrinal à imposer aux +réalités qu'il prétend éclairer. Il vaut comme structure minimale +d'intelligibilité, c'est-à-dire comme opérateur permettant de saisir +qu'aucun régime n'est viable s'il ne parvient, d'une manière ou d'une +autre, à articuler une mémoire instituante, une capacité d'effectuation +et une scène de mise à l'épreuve. Dès que l'une de ces dimensions +prétend valoir pour le tout, le régime commence à dériver : l'héritage +se fige en injonction, la puissance se ferme en empêchement, la scène se +vide en simulacre. L'intérêt du paradigme archicratique est précisément +de rendre ces dérives repérables sans postuler pour autant l'existence +d'une formule idéale de leur équilibre. Il ne promet pas une harmonie ; +il rend pensable une tenue sous tension. + +C'est pourquoi la tenségrité, ici mobilisée avec précaution, +n'intervient pas comme image décorative, mais comme opérateur de +rigueur. Elle permet de penser que la viabilité d'un ordre n'est pas +celle d'un édifice immobile, mais celle d'une structure qui ne tient +qu'en supportant des contraintes hétérogènes, en absorbant des +variations, en laissant jouer des reprises. Sous cet angle, la +régulation n'est jamais donnée une fois pour toutes ; elle est toujours +l'affaire d'un réajustement, d'une vigilance, d'une exposition +renouvelée des prises qui composent un monde commun. L'archicratie ne +nomme donc pas un état de perfection politique ; elle désigne la +condition sous laquelle un régime peut demeurer transformable sans +perdre toute consistance, et consistant sans devenir indisponible à sa +propre critique. + +Les six corollaires dégagés plus haut précisent alors la portée concrète +de cette proposition. Ils montrent que le paradigme ne vaut qu'à la +condition d'accepter sa propre vulnérabilité : il n'y a d'archicratie +qu'exposée à la possibilité de son échec, c'est-à-dire à la possibilité +que l'un de ses pôles absorbe les autres, que la tension cesse d'être +soutenue, que la scène soit neutralisée ou que la mémoire soit +instrumentalisée. En ce sens, la force du paradigme tient moins à une +prétention totalisante qu'à sa capacité d'organiser une vigilance réglée +sur les formes de capture, de rigidification et d'auto-immunisation qui +menacent toute structure régulatrice. Il ne dit pas ce qu'un ordre doit +être en général ; il aide à discerner ce qui, dans un ordre donné, +commence à ne plus pouvoir être repris, contesté ou reconfiguré. + +Dès lors, l'enjeu n'est pas spéculatif. Si cette section a atteint son +but, elle laisse apparaître que l'archicratie ne pourra être tenue pour +recevable qu'à condition d'entrer dans l'épreuve des cas, des +dispositifs, des trajectoires historiques et des montages +institutionnels effectifs. Il ne suffira pas qu'elle soit +conceptuellement cohérente ; il faudra encore qu'elle permette de mieux +lire des configurations concrètes, d'identifier leurs points de bascule, +de comparer leurs formes de viabilité, et de faire apparaître, avec plus +de précision qu'auparavant, les moments où un régime se ferme, se +dérègle ou se recompose. C'est seulement à ce prix qu'un paradigme cesse +d'être une architecture intellectuelle séduisante pour devenir un +véritable instrument de discernement. + +Ainsi, la clausule de 3.8 ne ferme pas la réflexion ; elle en déplace +l'exigence. Elle marque le point où l'archicratie cesse d'être seulement +déduite des pensées traversées pour devoir répondre de sa propre +puissance d'éclairage. Ce déplacement est décisif : il signifie que le +paradigme n'a désormais plus pour tâche première de se dire, mais de se +mesurer. Non de s'abriter dans la généralité du concept, mais +d'affronter la rugosité des mondes historiques où mémoire, puissance et +scène se nouent, se contredisent, se bloquent ou s'ajustent. C'est dans +cet affrontement seulement qu'il pourra être établi si l'archicratie +constitue bien une grammaire robuste de la co-viabilité, ou si elle doit +encore être corrigée par ce qu'elle prétend rendre lisible. + +Sous cette réserve — qui est aussi sa condition de probité —, +l'hypothèse archicratique peut désormais être tenue pour suffisamment +formée pour affronter la suite. Non comme vérité acquise, mais comme +instrument de lecture sous contrainte ; non comme doctrine close, mais +comme structure révisable d'intelligibilité ; non comme promesse +d'ordre, mais comme exigence de composition entre ce qui hérite, ce qui +agit et ce qui s'expose à l'épreuve. La suite du travail devra donc +montrer, en situation, ce que vaut réellement cette promesse de +discernement. Car une pensée de la régulation n'atteint sa pleine +légitimité qu'au moment où elle s'éprouve dans les mondes qu'elle +prétend éclairer. + +## **Conclusion du chapitre 3 — Pour une grammaire critique des régimes régulateurs : l'épreuve paradigmatique de l'archicration** + +Ce chapitre n'avait pas pour fin d'ajouter un concept de plus à +l'arsenal des théories du politique, mais de dégager les conditions de +lisibilité d'un régime de régulation encore insuffisamment thématisé +comme tel. À travers l'élucidation de l'arcalité, de la cratialité et de +l'archicration, il ne s'agissait pas de proposer une doctrine nouvelle, +mais de rendre intelligible une structure de co-viabilité sans laquelle +aucune tenue politique ne peut durablement se soutenir. + +Ce qui se trouve désormais acquis, ce n'est pas un modèle idéal, mais +une grammaire. Une grammaire de tensions, de co-contraintes et de +reprises, qui permet de reconnaître ce qui, dans un ordre donné, relève +encore d'un régime archicratique et ce qui, déjà, s'en écarte. +L'archicratie ne désigne donc pas une forme politique parmi d'autres, +mais une condition de viabilité régulatrice : celle par laquelle un +ordre peut durer sans se figer, agir sans s'auto-immuniser, et se +contester sans se dissoudre. + +Le gain propre de ce chapitre tient moins à l'invention d'un vocabulaire +qu'à la stabilisation d'un critère. En articulant arcalité, cratialité +et archicration dans une tenségrité évolutive, il devient possible de +distinguer ce qui relève d'une régulation vivante de ce qui procède déjà +de la clôture, de la neutralisation ou de la capture. Il permet de +discerner comment il tient, où il se dérègle, et selon quelles modalités +il peut encore être repris. + +Une telle clarification n'épuise nullement la question du politique ; +elle en déplace plutôt l'exigence. Ce chapitre ne prétend ni fournir une +théorie exhaustive du pouvoir, ni clore la typologie des régimes. Il +n'avait pas davantage pour objet d'évaluer empiriquement des +configurations historiques ou contemporaines. + +Il faut même préciser davantage la portée de ce résultat. L'archicratie +ne se présente pas comme la vérité ultime des philosophies politiques, +mais comme un opérateur critique de discernement. Elle ne vient ni +annuler les cadres antérieurs, ni les reléguer à l'erreur, mais éprouver +ce qu'ils laissent dans l'ombre lorsqu'ils surinvestissent un registre +unique de la régulation. Sa légitimité ne tient donc pas à une +prétention hégémonique ; elle tient à sa capacité de produire, cas par +cas, des distinctions plus fines entre ce qui fonde, ce qui agit et ce +qui se laisse reprendre. + +Ce qu'il établit, en revanche, ce sont les conditions minimales d'une +épreuve possible : les seuils, les tensions et les scènes à partir +desquels un ordre pourra être interrogé dans sa capacité à demeurer +transformable. + +Ce qui a été stabilisé ici appelle désormais autre chose qu'une simple +reconduction théorique. Non pour être confirmé de l'extérieur, mais pour +être exposé à ses propres exigences. C'est à ce point que l'élaboration +conceptuelle rencontre sa limite féconde, et que commence la nécessité +d'une mise à l'épreuve plus directe dans les configurations concrètes où +se jouent, se nouent et se dénouent les tensions constitutives d'un +monde commun. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-4.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-4.mdx index 73c31fe..bcb84e5 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-4.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-4.mdx @@ -1,1519 +1,7083 @@ --- -title: "Chapitre 4 — Histoire archicratique des révolutions industrielles" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Chapitre 4 — Histoire archicratique des révolutions industrielles +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 50 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_4—Vers_une_histoire_archicratique_des_revolutions_industrielles-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_4—Vers_une_histoire_archicratique_des_revolutions_industrielles-version_officielle.docx --- -Parmi les mythes historiographiques tenaces — et dont les effets traversent aussi bien les manuels scolaires, les grands récits politiques et les matrices de pensée économique — figure celui d’une histoire linéaire du progrès technique, scandée par des “révolutions industrielles” décrites comme des seuils d’innovation, des ruptures énergétiques et des gains de productivité. Cette trame narrative repose sur une vision téléologique du développement, où chaque transformation renforce l’adéquation entre rationalité technicienne, puissance matérielle et organisation des sociétés humaines. -Or, ce récit est trompeur. Ce que l’on nomme “révolution industrielle” ne se réduit pas à un événement technologique : il s’agit d’une mutation des régimes de régulation, d’une reconfiguration des conditions de viabilité collective, d’une transformation du tissu archicratique dans lequel s’inscrivent les formes de vie. - -Il nous faut donc déplacer le regard. Non plus partir de l’innovation technique pour en déduire des effets sociaux, mais interroger l’industrialisation comme moment de recomposition de la régulation. Ce qui se transforme à chaque seuil n’est pas seulement la production, mais les formes du vivre, du percevoir, du gouverner, du résister. - -C’est ici que prend sens la grille analytique élaborée précédemment : chaque configuration historique peut être comprise comme l’articulation tensionnelle d’une arcalité (formes d’institution du monde vécu), d’une cratialité (modalités d’exercice de la puissance) et d’une archicration (scènes et dispositifs de régulation permettant — ou non — leur co-viabilité). - -## **4.1 — Penser l’industrialisation comme régime archicratique** - -Penser l’industrialisation autrement exige de la dégager des couches d’enfouissement historiographique qui l’ont réduite à une simple intensification technique, alors qu’elle engage en réalité une configuration régulatoire globale. Car le terme même de « révolution industrielle », aujourd’hui si couramment mobilisé qu’il semble aller de soi, procède d’une construction idéologique élaborée dans un contexte fortement travaillé par des intérêts politiques, économiques et épistémiques. Il ne désigne pas un processus objectif ; il opère comme un acte de nomination normative qui confère à certains événements ou innovations une valeur de rupture et une centralité presque messianique dans le récit du progrès moderne. - -La catégorie de *révolution industrielle* est ainsi, dès son origine, profondément téléologique et européocentrée. Elle suppose un mouvement cumulatif d’accroissement des capacités productives, rendu possible par l’inventivité humaine, la rationalité instrumentale et l’organisation économique. De Toynbee à Allen, en passant par Landes et Hobsbawm, une part importante de la littérature dominante a traité les révolutions industrielles dans un horizon surtout économiciste et téléologique, en les arrimant à des ruptures techniques sans examiner à suffisance les régimes de régulation, de conflictualité et de symbolisation qu’elles recomposaient. La question décisive est alors la suivante : qu’est-ce qui a réellement été révolutionné dans ces révolutions ? - -C’est à cette interrogation que notre démarche archicratique tente de répondre. Non en contestant l’existence d’inflexions majeures dans l’histoire des techniques, mais en refusant d’en faire le moteur premier de la transformation des sociétés humaines. - -Le point décisif n’est pas ici de substituer un vocabulaire à un autre, ni d’opposer abstraitement une lecture “archicratique” à une lecture “économique”. Il est de montrer ce que cette dernière tend à laisser en retrait : non seulement la hausse des capacités productives, mais la redistribution corrélative des scènes de recevabilité, des formes de docilité, des rythmes d’épreuve et des possibilités de reprise. Là où l’histoire économique décrit avec précision les investissements, les marchés, les coûts, les salaires ou les gains de productivité, la lecture archicratique cherche à rendre visible la recomposition conjointe du fondement, de l’effectuation et de la contestation. Son gain propre ne réside donc pas dans la concurrence frontale, mais dans l’élucidation de ce qui, dans l’industrialisation, excède l’économie sans lui être extérieur : la mutation des formes mêmes selon lesquelles un ordre peut se faire tenir, se justifier et se soustraire à la reprise. - -Les innovations ne transforment le monde qu’à travers leur inscription dans des régimes de régulation, c’est-à-dire dans des configurations instituées de normes, de temporalités, de puissances et de scènes. - -Il faut alors distinguer la technique comme opération de la technique comme dispositif régulateur. C’est à ce second niveau que devient pensable l’approche archicratique. L’industrialisation doit alors se lire moins comme histoire des outils que comme histoire de leur mise en ordre, de leur canalisation sociale et de leur normalisation productive. Elle correspond à l’instauration d’un régime de viabilité structuré autour d’un triptyque : formes d’institution du monde (arcalité), modalités d’imposition de la puissance (cratialité), dispositifs de stabilisation régulatrice (archicration). Sans ce triptyque, il n’y a pas encore révolution industrielle, mais seulement des inventions techniques privées de portée politique durable. - -Avant de modéliser les quatre grandes phases que la doxa désigne comme “révolutions industrielles”, il faut toutefois rappeler un point décisif : la pluralité des temporalités techno-régulatrices. Aucune des mutations industrielles ne se produit dans un temps homogène, universel, linéaire. Le récit linéaire, quasi-légendaire, selon lequel l’Angleterre invente, l’Europe généralise, le monde suit, est une image d’épinal. La diffusion d’un dispositif industriel ne suit jamais un seul axe de propagation, mais s’inscrit dans des hétérochronies, des zones de friction, des sédimentations différenciées selon les régimes symboliques, politiques et économiques locaux. - -Ainsi, au sein même d’une période donnée — disons, la deuxième révolution industrielle — coexistent des régimes arcalo-cratialo-archicratiques très différents selon les lieux : ce que l’on observe dans la Ruhr ne correspond pas à ce qui se joue au Japon, à Buenos Aires ou en URSS. Penser l’industrialisation comme régime archicratique, c’est donc la désoccidentaliser, la désynchroniser et la dénaturaliser comme évidence historique. L’enjeu devient alors moins de décrire une série de faits techniques que de cartographier une pluralité de régimes de régulation qui se recomposent, s’affrontent, s’imitent ou se parasitent. La notion même de “révolution” devient alors suspecte : trop brutale, trop unifiante, trop idéologique. Nous lui préférons celle de *recomposition régulatoire tensionnelle*. - -Cette approche ne surplombe pourtant pas son objet depuis une grille conceptuelle arbitraire. Elle s’inscrit dans un héritage critique exigeant. Lewis Mumford avait déjà montré, dans *Technique and Civilization* (1934), que l’âge de la machine commence moins avec la vapeur qu’avec la régulation horaire et la domestication du rythme corporel. Simondon invitait à penser la technique comme milieu associé ; André Gorz rappelait que l’entrée dans la société industrielle engage d’abord une normalisation de la subjectivité productive ; Bruno Latour, enfin, a contribué à décrire les technologies comme actrices de régulations inscrites dans des réseaux hybrides de pouvoir. - -Nous proposons donc une lecture archicratique soutenue de l’industrialisation, non pour épuiser à elle seule l’intelligibilité du phénomène, mais pour dégager les régimes de sens, de pouvoir et de normativité que les dispositifs techniques ont portés, institués, stabilisés ou rendus invisibles. Chaque révolution industrielle sera lue comme une recomposition de notre triptyque fondamental — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — plutôt que comme une simple séquence d’innovations. - -## **4.2 — Première révolution industrielle (1780–1850) : proto-archicration de l’ordre mécanisé** - -On a trop souvent raconté la première révolution industrielle comme une épopée de la vapeur, comme l’histoire d’inventeurs et d’entrepreneurs, comme l’avènement d’une modernité productive où l’homme, armé de science et de machine, aurait enfin accru sa maîtrise de la nature. La trame narrative dominante — des métiers à tisser mécaniques aux mines de charbon, des usines textiles de Manchester aux locomotives de Stephenson — se déploie comme une fresque de conquête technique, d’accélération économique et d’innovation sociale. Pourtant, ce récit linéaire, épique et téléologique ne parvient pas à penser ce qui s’est véritablement instauré dans cette phase fondatrice de l’ère industrielle : moins une multiplication d’artefacts qu’un nouveau régime de régulation du monde, à la fois structuré, disciplinaire, conflictuel et encore fragile - -Ce que nous appelons ici « première révolution industrielle » doit être repensé comme l’émergence d’une configuration régulatoire nouvelle. Nous n’avons pas affaire à un simple saut quantitatif de la production, mais à une recomposition des conditions de viabilité collective, dans laquelle temps, corps, contrat, geste, fatigue, norme et espace sont redistribués. Cette phase — que nous situons entre 1780 et 1850 — doit ainsi être lue comme une proto-archicration : une scène encore instable, fragmentaire et conflictuelle, où la régulation industrielle cherche ses formes avant leur codification plus étatique dans les décennies suivantes. - -La section analysera cette proto-archicration mécanisée selon trois temps distincts mais intégrés : une arcalité disciplinaire, faite de temps uniformisé, d’espaces clos et de rythmes segmentés ; une cratialité extractive, centrée sur l’effort canalisé, l’obéissance incorporée et la force productivisée ; une archicration fondatrice, où émergent le contrat, le salaire et la norme, et où l’ordre industriel commence à se donner comme totalité régulatrice. Nous prolongerons cette lecture par un cas paradigmatique, celui de Manchester, avant d’en dégager les tensions, instabilités et apories propres. - -### *4.2.1 – Cadre de départ : repolitiser la révolution industrielle anglaise* - -Trop décrite, commémorée et canonisée, la révolution industrielle anglaise a fini par se recouvrir de ses propres mythes. Le récit dominant, construit entre la fin du XIXe et le milieu du XXe siècle, s’est longtemps concentré sur un triptyque devenu dogme : la machine à vapeur, l’industrie textile, le charbon. C’est ainsi que les manuels scolaires, les grands récits économiques et les expositions universelles ont façonné un imaginaire de la modernité fondé sur la puissance technique, l’inventivité entrepreneuriale et la maîtrise progressive des ressources naturelles. Or, cette narration, que l’on retrouve chez des figures aussi influentes que David S. Landes (*The Unbound Prometheus*, 1969), Joel Mokyr (*The Lever of Riches*, 1990), repose sur plusieurs présupposés majeurs : linéarité causale, universalisme occidental, neutralité de la technique, économie pensée comme moteur premier de l’histoire. - -Ces auteurs, bien que parfois critiques à l’égard du capitalisme, participent néanmoins d’un même paradigme que l’on pourrait qualifier de fonctionnaliste-accélérationniste. Selon ce cadre, la révolution industrielle est pensée comme un processus d’accumulation de gains de productivité, rendu possible par des innovations techniques et des structures institutionnelles adaptées à leur mise en œuvre. L’histoire y est pensée en termes de mouvement, de croissance et de rendement ; le progrès s’y confond avec la vitesse. Les apports empiriques de cette historiographie sont considérables — notamment en ce qui concerne la chronologie des inventions, les dynamiques du marché du travail ou les politiques d’exportation technologique — ce qui lui manque, en revanche, c’est une pensée rigoureuse de la régulation. Car ce qu’elle laisse dans l’ombre, c’est la manière dont les sociétés ont rendu possible leur viabilité dans et par l’industrialisation : *quels types de corps, de normes, de temporalités et de subjectivités ont dû être produits, imposés et légitimés pour qu’une machine ne soit pas simplement un artefact, mais un opérateur d’ordre ?* - -C’est à cette lacune, à la fois épistémologique et politique, que nous nous attachons ici. Car nous faisons l’hypothèse que la révolution industrielle, dans sa première phase, est d’abord l’instauration d’un régime disciplinaire de la productivité. Il faut l’entendre comme l’émergence d’un mode de régulation spécifique, plutôt que comme un ordre simplement imposé par la brutalité, où la production répétée, segmentée, quantifiée, mesurée du travail humain devient la clé de voûte de la viabilité collective. Ce n’est pas l’abondance des techniques qui produit l’industrie, c’est la mise en place d’un dispositif de synchronisation, de canalisation et de normativité qui permet à ces techniques d’être stabilisées, répétées, généralisées, opérantes. Autrement dit, l’infrastructure industrielle est d’abord une infrastructure régulatoire, et non uniquement matérielle. - -Nous appelons proto-archicration cette configuration émergente. Le préfixe *proto-* indique que nous avons affaire à une forme naissante, partielle, encore instable de régulation archicratique. Celle-ci ne dispose pas encore d’un État organisé autour d’un projet industriel centralisé. Elle ne s’incarne pas dans un appareil bureaucratique normatif, ni dans une ingénierie sociale pleinement développée. Elle réside dans un ensemble de dispositifs discontinus mais convergents : l’atelier transformé en fabrique, la fabrique transformée en usine ; la mesure du temps devenue discipline ; le contrat salarial émergent ; les premières tentatives de juridicisation du travail ; les premiers contremaîtres, les premières normes, les premières résistances. La proto-archicration désigne donc cette phase où l’industrialisation devient régulation du monde sans encore pouvoir se nommer comme telle. - -Le choix d’inscrire cette proto-archicration dans une période allant de 1780 à 1850 ne relève pas d’un arbitraire. Il est fondé sur des repères précis, à la fois historiographiques et régulatoires. 1780 marque le début de l’accélération des innovations techniques, avec l’amélioration de la machine à vapeur par James Watt, la généralisation de la mule-jenny, la montée en puissance des manufactures textiles, notamment autour de Manchester. Mais c’est surtout à partir de cette date que les formes d’organisation du travail commencent à se codifier durablement, que la synchronisation horaire devient impératif collectif, que le rapport salarial se sédimente comme condition de survie. De l’autre côté de la séquence, la décennie 1840–1850 marque plusieurs seuils régulateurs décisifs : les Factory Acts de 1833 et 1847 en Angleterre, la montée des luttes ouvrières, la généralisation du discours hygiéniste et productiviste, mais aussi, à l’échelle européenne, les insurrections de 1848, qui signent la fin d’une époque d’institution informelle de la régulation, et le début d’une institutionnalisation partielle du social par l’État. - -Entre ces deux bornes, la première révolution industrielle apparaît ainsi non comme un moment inaugural ou héroïque, mais comme une matrice d’instauration régulatoire, où les tensions entre techniques, pouvoirs, normes, subjectivités et temporalités coagulées donnent naissance à une nouvelle scène du monde : l’atelier mécanisé comme espace de discipline, la fabrique comme opérateur d’obéissance, le salaire comme modalité d’assujettissement. L’archicration s’y cherche, tâtonne, s’impose. Elle n’est pas encore nommée, mais elle agit. Elle commence. - -### 4.2.2 – *Arcalité disciplinaire : temps usinier, espace cloisonné, rythmes imposés* - -Au-delà de la mécanique, du charbon ou des machines textiles, la première révolution industrielle institue une transformation radicale du régime d’institution du monde. L’enjeu n’est pas simplement technique : il est cosmo-anthropologique. Ce qui bascule, c’est l’*arcalité* — ce tissu invisible de structuration du réel qui articule les perceptions du temps, de l’espace, du geste et de la signification. L’arcalité, dans notre grille régulatoire, désigne en effet l’ensemble des formes instituées d’*agencement du monde* : modalités temporelles, spatialités légitimes, symboliques opérantes, schémas du pensable. Or, l’industrialisation n’installe pas seulement des infrastructures techniques : elle redéfinit les conditions de possibilité de l’existence collective. - -L’histoire dominante s’est trop souvent arrêtée aux objets visibles — vapeur, filature, sidérurgie — sans interroger la transformation profonde des manières d’habiter le temps, l’espace et le corps. C’est pourtant là, dans la mutation de l’expérience régulée du monde, que s’opère la bascule archicratique. Dès les années 1780–1830, la fabrique anglaise n’est pas seulement un lieu de production : elle devient un dispositif d’encodage du réel, une matrice régulatrice dans laquelle le temps, l’espace et le geste sont restructurés à travers une logique disciplinaire inédite. Ce régime, que nous nommons arcalité disciplinaire, opère selon quatre axes intégrés : - -- Temporalité uniforme et mesurable, imposée par l’horloge, la cadence, la productivité. - -- Spatialité cloisonnée et hiérarchisée, articulée autour du contrôle visuel et de la segmentation fonctionnelle. - -- Gestuelle contrainte et mécanisée, standardisée à la logique cyclique de la machine. - -- Symbolique productiviste du monde, où l’imaginaire communautaire est dissous dans un temps calculatoire. - -Peu visible en elle-même, elle structure pourtant l’ensemble : rythmes du travail, division des rôles, organisation de l’effort, ancrage des gestes, perception du réel. Pour en saisir la portée, il faut défaire les couches d’illusion technicienne et poser un diagnostic plus profond : celui d’une reconfiguration ontologique du monde vécu. - -Plus précisément, l’enjeu n’est pas seulement que le temps change de forme, mais qu’il change de fonction régulatrice : il cesse d’être le milieu pluriel d’une existence rythmée pour devenir l’instrument homogène d’une extraction gouvernable. - -La première grande inflexion arcale de la modernité industrielle s’est jouée dans la temporalité plus encore que dans la machine. Edward P. Thompson, dans son texte fondamental *Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism* (1967), démontrait déjà que la transformation du temps de travail n’était pas un sous-produit de la technique, mais un opérateur culturel, moral, politique. Le passage du « *temps de tâche* » — souple, communautaire, saisonnier — au « *temps d’horloge* » — linéaire, mesuré, quantifié — marque l’émergence d’un temps productiviste intériorisé, condition de la viabilité du capitalisme industriel. - -Le point décisif, pour notre propos, est donc moins la transformation technique du temps que sa conversion en opérateur de discipline généralisée. - -Dans les manufactures anglaises des années 1790 à 1830, notamment dans les usines textiles du Lancashire et de Nottinghamshire, l’horaire ouvrier dépasse couramment les 70 heures hebdomadaires. Le Factory Act de 1833, tout en tentant d’encadrer le travail des enfants, laisse inchangée cette temporalité compressée, qui devient la norme implicite du rendement. L’horloge murale devient organe de commandement ; les sirènes scandent les transitions ; les registres de pointage imposent la visibilité du temps sur chaque corps. - -Ce régime de synchronisation n’est pas seulement logistique : il est ontologique. L’individu n’habite plus un temps sacré ou cyclique — *celui des fêtes, des moissons, des dimanches, des saisons* — mais un temps linéaire, abstrait, téléologique, que Reinhart Koselleck désignera comme temps moderne orienté vers le futur (*Vergangene Zukunft*, 1979). Ce temps n’est plus habité : il est traversé, mesuré, exploité. Jacques Le Goff, dans *Pour un autre Moyen Âge* (1977), rappelait à quel point le temps liturgique médiéval était plural : jours saints, pauses rituelles, semaines non travaillées. L’arcalité disciplinaire dissout ces épaisseurs, non par décret, mais par naturalisation régulatoire : l’horloge devient plus impérieuse que la cloche, le poste de travail plus sacré que l’autel. - -Thompson souligne ainsi que la « *morale temporelle* » capitaliste n’est pas seulement imposée : elle est intériorisée comme forme de vertu civique, fondée sur la ponctualité, l’exactitude, l’assiduité. Le temps devient non seulement le cadre de l’action, mais aussi la mesure de la valeur humaine : la ponctualité tend à valoir comme preuve d’existence sociale, le retard comme signe d’échec. L’arcalité devient ainsi discipline du souffle, *discipline de la durée*, *discipline de l’attention*. - -Le second pilier de l’arcalité disciplinaire, aussi fondamental que la synchronisation temporelle, réside dans l’agencement de l’espace productif. La fabrique ne se contente pas d’abriter les machines : elle constitue un dispositif régulateur spatialement configuré, où le contrôle, la segmentation et la hiérarchisation façonnent une micro-architecture du pouvoir. La spatialité industrielle ne relève donc pas de la seule fonctionnalité : elle est aussi politique, symbolique et archicratique. - -Michel Foucault, dans *Surveiller et punir* (1975), a magistralement saisi la fabrique comme l’un des prototypes de l’espace disciplinaire moderne — aux côtés de la caserne, de la prison, de l’école. Il écrit : « L’espace disciplinaire tend vers l’organisation d’un champ analytique. Les individus y sont localisés, formés, rendus productifs, transformés » (p. 172). Cette logique se matérialise dès les premières manufactures textiles anglaises : les ateliers sont alignés, les postes délimités, les circulations canalisées, les corps assignés à résidence productive. Chaque ouvrier est visibilisé, surveillé, rendu opératoire dans une géométrie du rendement. - -L’organisation de l’espace répond à une grammaire implicite : voir sans être vu, contrôler sans relâche, isoler sans séparer. Comme l’ont souligné Maxine Berg et Pat Hudson dans *The Industrial Revolution in Britain* (1992), la construction des usines du nord de l’Angleterre — notamment à Cromford, Manchester ou New Lanark — repose sur des principes explicites de division fonctionnelle de l’espace, optimisation de la lumière naturelle, mobilité restreinte des corps, surélévation du contremaître. Il s’agit non seulement de produire des biens, mais de produire des comportements. L’espace devient une pédagogie incorporée de l’obéissance. - -À cette spatialité régulée s’ajoute une autre forme de violence symbolique : l’effacement de l’extérieur. Le travailleur, enfermé dans l’enceinte de la fabrique, est soustrait à la rue, au village, au ciel, au cycle du jour. Les hautes fenêtres laissent entrer la lumière, mais non la vue. Le dehors n’existe plus que comme horizon de fatigue. L’espace est désormais intégré au temps : il devient surface de rendement par mètre carré. - -Mais c’est dans la chair même du travail que s’inscrit l’arcalité disciplinaire : le corps ouvrier devient support de régulation, vecteur d’effort mesurable, organe d’interface avec la machine. Là où l’artisan maîtrisait encore le cycle du geste et l’intention de l’œuvre, l’ouvrier de la fabrique est exproprié de son geste, assigné à une séquence fonctionnelle, répétitive, vidée de toute intentionnalité créative. - -Lewis Mumford, dans *Technics and Civilization* (1934), souligne que l’effet le plus profond de la machine n’est pas la puissance énergétique, mais la déqualification du geste humain. Il note : « L’homme devient auxiliaire d’un rythme qui ne vient plus de lui. » Ce rythme, imprimé par l’arbre de transmission, par la vapeur, par le cycle mécanique, impose un nouveau rapport au corps : le muscle devient moteur, la posture devient contrainte, la fatigue devient calculable. - -Cette codification gestuelle s’observe dans les premiers manuels de formation ouvrière — comme les *Rules for the Discipline of the Mill* (1821) — où sont spécifiés les postes à tenir, les fautes à éviter, les gestes à répéter. Toute dérive est une perte : perte de production, perte de discipline, perte de contrôle. Le corps doit être tenu, mesuré, plié à la logique de la machine. Il devient technologiquement régulé avant d’être technologiquement remplacé. - -Ce processus n’est pas naturel : il est institué. Il s’inscrit dans une logique de soumission corporelle, où l’effort n’est plus librement consenti, mais requis, calibré, normé. L’intelligence du geste est supprimée au profit de l’exécution sans surplus. L’archicratie industrielle passe ici par le contrôle fin des rythmes corporels, par la standardisation du souffle, par l’exclusion de toute autonomie gestuelle. - -Mais cette régulation ne serait pas archicratique si elle ne s’attaquait aussi à la symbolique du monde vécu. L’arcalité disciplinaire désactive les régimes symboliques préindustriels : elle efface les rituels, désynchronise les fêtes, vide les jours de leur texture. Là où le temps s’inscrivait dans une narration sacrée — avec ses sabbats, ses saisons, ses rites de passage — il devient fonctionnel, plat, programmable. - -Karl Polanyi, dans *La Grande Transformation* (1944), appelle cela le *désencastrement* : le temps, le travail, la terre — naguère enveloppés de significations collectives — deviennent des marchandises fictives, détachées de tout enracinement. Le dimanche devient jour de fatigue. Le cycle lunaire, indicateur de moisson, devient résidu folklorique. Le calendrier grégorien est absorbé par le *planning productif*. Il ne reste plus de l’ancien monde qu’un rythme désarticulé, converti en intervalle logistique. - -Cette symbolique arrachée n’est pas un détail : elle fonde une ontologie de la perte, un vide que l’arcalité industrielle comble par une autre sacralité — celle de la productivité, du rendement, de l’utilité. Là où le jour était tissé de prières, de chants, de pauses, il devient compartiment d’efficacité, valeur horaire, cycle d’usure. C’est là que s’opère le noyau dur de l’archicration industrielle future : le monde devient usine, le monde devient *programme*, le monde devient cadence régulée sans transcendance. - -### 4.2.3 – *Cratialité extractive* : fragmentation du geste, privatisation du pouvoir, marchandisation de l’effort - -La première révolution industrielle ne met pas seulement en place une nouvelle organisation du temps et une spatialisation productive du travail : elle inaugure une modalité inédite de la puissance, au sens strict du grec *kratos* — la force, la domination, l’acte de soumission effective. Cette modalité n’émane ni de l’État ni d’un souverain transcendant ; elle procède d’un opérateur privé, diffus, entrepreneurialisé, enchâssé dans l’économie de l’usine. Émerge ainsi une *cratialité extractive* : régime d’imposition du geste, de l’effort, du souffle, du muscle, visant à transformer l’énergie humaine en output mécanique mesurable, sans autre légitimation que le rendement. Ce régime de pouvoir n’est ni symbolique ni simplement administratif : il est régulatoire au sens fort — c’est-à-dire qu’il configure les conditions d’expression, de circulation et d’extraction de la puissance d’agir humaine. Il gouverne par application directe à la substance corporelle du travail vivant, bien plus que par représentation. En cela, la cratialité extractive doit être comprise comme une modalité d’administration des forces. Là où l’arcalité disciplinaire reconfigure le monde du pensable, la cratialité extractive s’empare de la matière vivante elle-même : elle la saisit, la plie, l’épuise, l’ordonne. - -Dans notre modélisation, elle désigne les modalités d’exercice du pouvoir sous forme d’imposition pratique. Elle est *le régime de la contrainte incarnée* : ses opérateurs ne sont pas toujours visibles (chefs, lois, polices), mais ses effets sont tangibles — fatigue, reddition, docilité, cadence. Ce que la première usine invente, ce n’est pas la force mécanique en soi, mais *la technique d’asservissement différenciée de la force humaine à la puissance machinique*. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de faire produire : il s’agit de *faire produire plus vite, plus longtemps, plus identiquement*, à moindre coût, sans remise en question, et sous une architecture de surveillance informelle mais constante. C’est le règne de l'effort capté. - -Cette cratialité peut être déployée selon trois volets formant une architecture régulatoire interconnectée : - -- Désintégration du geste total et fragmentation de l’effort - -- Codification disciplinaire de l’obéissance productive - -- Privatisation du commandement et généralisation du pouvoir entrepreneurial - -Le premier mouvement de cette *cratialité extractive* est *la désarticulation du geste* : là où l’artisan, dans le régime pré-industriel, exerçait un travail holistique — depuis la matière brute jusqu’à la forme finie, dans un continuum de gestes intégrés et signifiants —, l’ouvrier de fabrique voit son corps éclaté en *fonctions techniques partielles*. La gestualité cesse d’être une compétence : elle devient une *brique fonctionnelle dans un système mécanique plus vaste*. Ce que Mauss appelait « techniques du corps » (1934) devient, dans l’usine, *morceau de chaîne*, interchangeable, remplaçable, quantifiable. Dans leur diversité ethnographique, les techniques du corps s’intégraient à un monde de sens — marche, port, prière, combat ; la fabrique industrielle, elle, désymbolise ces gestes pour les aligner sur des standards de performance strictement mécanistes. Le corps devient opérateur sans mémoire ni ritualité. - -Dans les filatures mécaniques de type Arkwright ou Cromford, la « spinner girl » (fileuse), assignée à sa rangée de broches, répète inlassablement les mêmes gestes : insérer, tirer, relancer le fil, corriger un enchevêtrement. Chaque geste est conditionné par le rythme de la machine, non par une intention propre. À la Smithies, dans les aciéries de Sheffield, les manœuvres se succèdent sans jamais voir l’objet fini. *Le geste est divorcé de son sens.* La substitution partielle de la main par l’engrenage n’abolit pas le corps — elle le *redéfinit comme relais contraint*. - -Cette déqualification massive a été relevée dès le XIXe siècle par Friedrich Engels, dans *La Situation de la classe laborieuse en Angleterre* (1845), où il observe : « Chaque ouvrier est réduit à n’être qu’un fragment vivant de machine, assigné à un mouvement stupide, répété toute la journée » (trad. fr., p. 88). Plus tard, Harry Braverman dans *Labour and Monopoly Capital* (1974), théorisera cette tendance comme *dépossession du savoir ouvrier*, c’est-à-dire comme réduction du travail à sa plus simple expression opératoire, facilitant la substitution, l’échange, la menace. Comme nous le verrons plus tard, ce paradigme trouvera son aboutissement normatif dans la rationalisation taylorienne du début du XXe siècle, où l’ouvrier devient un exécutant sans latitude, assigné à un geste optimisé par calcul externe. Dès lors, la performance n’est plus un effet de compétence, mais une résultante de calibrage. L’archétype du "*temps standard*" scellera cette dépossession gestuelle. - -Car oui, cette logique est directement liée au mode de rationalité industrielle émergent : il ne s’agit pas d’organiser le travail autour des hommes, mais de *calibrer les hommes pour le travail, pour les machines*. L’effort devient *matériau brut*, à exploiter au plus près de son seuil d’épuisement. Les corps sont alignés non pour coopérer, mais pour *mimer une coopération machinique*. Ce que l’on extrait n’est pas une œuvre, mais une *force de travail pure*, arrachée à ses finalités subjectives. - -La fragmentation du geste ne suffit pourtant pas à faire fonctionner la fabrique ; elle exige un second pilier : la codification minutieuse de l’obéissance. Car produire dans un système désintégratif, mécanisé, hiérarchisé, suppose une discipline constante — non pas seulement au sens moral, mais comme *structure d’incitation, de surveillance et de punition*. C’est ici que s’affirme le cœur de la *cratialité extractive* : une forme de pouvoir sans transcendance, immédiate, diffusée, technique, incorporée dans les gestes, dans les rythmes, dans les interactions. - -Dans les usines textiles de Manchester ou de Birmingham au tournant du XIXe siècle, la présence du contremaître devient centrale. Mais son autorité n’est ni militaire ni institutionnelle : elle est *productiviste*. Il ne commande pas parce qu’il détient un pouvoir politique, mais parce qu’il garantit la continuité de la production. Il surveille le temps, les gestes, les pauses. Il inflige des retenues de salaire, réprimande un ralentissement, menace d’une exclusion immédiate. Ce pouvoir n’est pas hiérarchique selon la logique du droit public : il est régulé fonctionnellement par la chaîne de valeur productive. Sa verticalité est téléologique, orienté vers la minimisation de la perte temporelle, et non vers une expression de souveraineté. - -C’est ici qu’intervient un glissement fondamental dans l’histoire de la souveraineté : *l’autorité productive remplace l’autorité politique*. L’obéissance ne s’adresse plus d’abord à un roi ou à une loi, mais à une machine, à un cycle, à une chaîne — et aux hommes chargés d’en assurer le bon fonctionnement. Ce phénomène, fort bien décrit par Michel Foucault dans ses cours au Collège de France (notamment *Naissance de la biopolitique*, 1978-79), inaugure un pouvoir sans visage, sans solennité, sans scène, *mais d’autant plus effectif qu’il est ancré dans les besoins quotidiens*. On ne discute pas le contremaître comme on conteste un préfet : on dépend de lui pour manger, pour survivre. - -Les règlements internes d’usine deviennent à ce titre les premiers *codes craticiels* de l’ère industrielle. Ils définissent avec une précision maniaque les horaires, les fautes, les interdictions, les peines. Le règlement de la *Lowell Mill* (Massachusetts, 1822) stipule que trois retards valent un renvoi ; celui de la *Saltaire Mill* (Yorkshire, 1837) impose une amende pour toute parole inutile échappée pendant le travail. Ces micro-normes codifient une nouvelle économie morale : *l’ouvrier n’est plus sujet, mais segment d’un flux productif à maintenir stable et rentable*. L’obéissance devient un critère de valeur. - -C’est cette *discipline par la menace du chômage* qui constitue l’un des moteurs profonds de la cratialité extractive. Le travailleur ne craint plus un maître, il craint *l’inemployabilité*. Et cette peur est d’autant plus puissante qu’elle est entretenue par la division du travail : chacun est substituable, chacun est duplicable. L’effet n’est pas seulement social — il est psychique : *l’ouvrier devient son propre surveillant*, intégré à une logique d’auto-contrôle qui précède de plus d’un siècle les thèses du management moderne. - -Ce que Polanyi appellera plus tard *le marché du travail fictif* (La Grande Transformation, 1944) prend ici une forme très concrète : on fait *circuler l’effort* comme une marchandise. La force humaine devient quantifiable, tarifée, échangeable, et donc, *soumise à la menace permanente d’obsolescence*. L’ouvrier doit s’auto-calibrer, s’auto-discipliner, s’auto-forcer. Le commandement est moins extérieur qu’intériorisé. - -Ainsi, *la soumission cratiale ne passe pas seulement par la coercition*, mais par une ingénierie diffuse des peurs, des attentes, des ambitions miniatures. On ne travaille plus pour faire œuvre — on travaille pour ne pas disparaître. Le rendement devient salut. La productivité devient dignité. Et l’effort, naguère honneur du corps, devient *exigence silencieuse de la structure*. - -La cratialité extractive qui s’impose dans les premières fabriques industrielles anglaises repose sur un paradoxe essentiel : le pouvoir n’y est ni étatique, ni transcendant, ni institutionnellement stabilisé, mais il est pour autant d’une efficacité redoutable. Cette puissance productive ne se déploie pas à partir d’un centre de souveraineté formel ; elle s’incarne dans des figures banales, parfois invisibles, de gestion, de contrôle, de pilotage local — le patron, le contremaître, l’investisseur, le régisseur. Autrement dit, la révolution industrielle n’institue pas un pouvoir vertical d’État sur les corps laborieux, mais une cratialité entrepreneuriale, privée, atomisée, fonctionnelle, fondée sur l’organisation de l’extraction. - -À la différence des formes de pouvoir monarchique, bureaucratique ou théologico-politique, la cratialité industrielle naissante ne repose ni sur un principe de légitimité transcendante, ni sur une codification juridique universelle. Elle procède d’une logique d’efficience : celui qui garantit la production décide ; celui qui fait travailler, commande ; celui qui organise le rendement, gouverne sans en avoir le titre. Cette délégation du commandement à l’entrepreneur, que Max Weber analysera plus tard dans *Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft* (1922) comme une forme de rationalisation fonctionnelle, préfigure déjà la dissociation entre autorité légitime et autorité opérationnelle. Le pouvoir devient *réseau, outil, mécanisme* : il ne dit plus, il fait faire. - -Cette dynamique est particulièrement visible dans les dispositifs patronaux de type paternaliste — comme ceux de Robert Owen à New Lanark, de Titus Salt à Saltaire, ou des familles Peel et Strutt dans le Derbyshire. Le patron y assume un rôle de régulateur global : il loge, surveille, réprimande, éduque, moralise. Mais ce rôle ne relève pas d’un mandat public. Il est *propriétaire du sol, de l’usine, des machines, des maisons, et par extension, des corps*. Cette privatisation du pouvoir est sans précédent dans l’histoire européenne moderne : elle transfère à l’entrepreneur la capacité de déterminer le quotidien, le temps, la norme, la règle, le seuil de tolérance. Ce pouvoir n’est pas juridiquement institué, mais économiquement advenu : il procède de la conjonction entre propriété privée des moyens de production et dépendance vitale des individus au revenu de subsistance. Il en résulte une capacité normative sans inscription étatique, que nous pouvons qualifier de souveraineté d’usage, sans reconnaissance symbolique. - -Comme le souligne l’historienne Emma Griffin dans *Liberty’s Dawn: A People's History of the Industrial Revolution* (2013), ce pouvoir privé s’est étendu par la simple logique du marché, sans qu’aucune révolution juridique ou politique ne vienne l’encadrer véritablement. Ce n’est qu’au milieu du XIXe siècle, avec la montée des luttes ouvrières et l’extension partielle du droit du travail (notamment avec le *Factory Act* de 1847), que l’État commence timidement à réintégrer la régulation cratiale. Mais jusque-là, la gouvernance des efforts, des gestes, des rythmes est entièrement confiée au capital privé. - -Nous touchons ici l’une des spécificités structurantes de la cratialité industrielle naissante : elle est anti-étatique dans sa genèse, mais hyper-normative dans ses effets. C’est-à-dire qu’elle ne naît pas d’un projet de gouvernement centralisé, mais d’une dynamique localisée d’optimisation du rendement — et pourtant, elle façonne l’existence des individus dans ses moindres détails : horaires, tenues, attitudes, pauses, sanctions, gestes, respiration même. En ce sens, elle préfigure les futurs régimes de gouvernance algorithmique : pouvoir diffus, omniprésent, sans sujet identifiable, mais dont la contrainte est maximale. - -La révolution industrielle ne centralise pas le pouvoir ; elle le distribue. Elle invente un mode de domination sans autorité formelle, mais d’une redoutable efficacité. Ce que Foucault appelait une "microphysique du pouvoir" (1975), se déploie ici à grande échelle : non pas un grand souverain, mais des milliers de petits agents du rendement, porteurs d’une rationalité disciplinaire incorporée, diffuse, économique. - -En cela, le capitalisme industriel du XIXe siècle marque une inflexion majeure dans l’histoire des pouvoirs : il privatise la régulation des corps, externalise l’obéissance, délègue la souveraineté à la logique productive. Et c’est pourquoi, dans notre lecture archicratique, cette cratialité extractive doit être pensée comme forme autonome de régulation, irréductible à l’appareil d’État, mais capable de produire des effets de domination systémique, étendus, permanents. - -Au terme de cette exploration de la cratialité extractive telle qu’elle se déploie dans la première révolution industrielle, il nous faut affronter ce qui en constitue le noyau opératoire : la réduction de l’effort humain à une ressource exploitable, quantifiable, ajustable — à la fois source d’énergie, unité de calcul et cible de contrôle. Entre 1780 et 1850 se met en place, dans les fabriques anglaises puis européennes, une mutation anthropotechnique : le corps n’est plus seulement instrument, il devient mesure. L’effort n’est plus simplement requis, il est organisé, prélevé, converti en valeur. +Parmi les mythes historiographiques tenaces — et dont les effets +traversent aussi bien les manuels scolaires, les grands récits +politiques et les matrices de pensée économique — figure celui d'une +histoire linéaire du progrès technique, scandée par des "révolutions +industrielles" décrites comme des seuils d'innovation, des ruptures +énergétiques et des gains de productivité. Cette trame narrative repose +sur une vision téléologique du développement, où chaque transformation +renforce l'adéquation entre rationalité technicienne, puissance +matérielle et organisation des sociétés humaines. + +Or, ce récit est trompeur. Ce que l'on nomme "révolution industrielle" +ne se réduit pas à un événement technologique : il s'agit d'une mutation +des régimes de régulation, d'une reconfiguration des conditions de +viabilité collective, d'une transformation du tissu archicratique dans +lequel s'inscrivent les formes de vie. + +Il nous faut donc déplacer le regard. Non plus partir de l'innovation +technique pour en déduire des effets sociaux, mais interroger +l'industrialisation comme moment de recomposition de la régulation. Ce +qui se transforme à chaque seuil n'est pas seulement la production, mais +les formes du vivre, du percevoir, du gouverner, du résister. + +C'est ici que prend sens la grille analytique élaborée précédemment : +chaque configuration historique peut être comprise comme l'articulation +tensionnelle d'une arcalité (formes d'institution du monde vécu), d'une +cratialité (modalités d'exercice de la puissance) et d'une archicration +(scènes et dispositifs de régulation permettant — ou non — leur +co-viabilité). + +## **4.1 — Penser l'industrialisation comme régime archicratique** + +Penser l'industrialisation autrement exige de la dégager des couches +d'enfouissement historiographique qui l'ont réduite à une simple +intensification technique, alors qu'elle engage en réalité une +configuration régulatoire globale. Car le terme même de « révolution +industrielle », aujourd'hui si couramment mobilisé qu'il semble aller de +soi, procède d'une construction idéologique élaborée dans un contexte +fortement travaillé par des intérêts politiques, économiques et +épistémiques. Il ne désigne pas un processus objectif ; il opère comme +un acte de nomination normative qui confère à certains événements ou +innovations une valeur de rupture et une centralité presque messianique +dans le récit du progrès moderne. + +La catégorie de *révolution industrielle* est ainsi, dès son origine, +profondément téléologique et européocentrée. Elle suppose un mouvement +cumulatif d'accroissement des capacités productives, rendu possible par +l'inventivité humaine, la rationalité instrumentale et l'organisation +économique. De Toynbee à Allen, en passant par Landes et Hobsbawm, une +part importante de la littérature dominante a traité les révolutions +industrielles dans un horizon surtout économiciste et téléologique, en +les arrimant à des ruptures techniques sans examiner à suffisance les +régimes de régulation, de conflictualité et de symbolisation qu'elles +recomposaient. La question décisive est alors la suivante : qu'est-ce +qui a réellement été révolutionné dans ces révolutions ? + +C'est à cette interrogation que notre démarche archicratique tente de +répondre. Non en contestant l'existence d'inflexions majeures dans +l'histoire des techniques, mais en refusant d'en faire le moteur premier +de la transformation des sociétés humaines. + +Le point décisif n'est pas ici de substituer un vocabulaire à un autre, +ni d'opposer abstraitement une lecture "archicratique" à une lecture +"économique". Il est de montrer ce que cette dernière tend à laisser en +retrait : non seulement la hausse des capacités productives, mais la +redistribution corrélative des scènes de recevabilité, des formes de +docilité, des rythmes d'épreuve et des possibilités de reprise. Là où +l'histoire économique décrit avec précision les investissements, les +marchés, les coûts, les salaires ou les gains de productivité, la +lecture archicratique cherche à rendre visible la recomposition +conjointe du fondement, de l'effectuation et de la contestation. Son +gain propre ne réside donc pas dans la concurrence frontale, mais dans +l'élucidation de ce qui, dans l'industrialisation, excède l'économie +sans lui être extérieur : la mutation des formes mêmes selon lesquelles +un ordre peut se faire tenir, se justifier et se soustraire à la +reprise. + +Les innovations ne transforment le monde qu'à travers leur inscription +dans des régimes de régulation, c'est-à-dire dans des configurations +instituées de normes, de temporalités, de puissances et de scènes. + +Il faut alors distinguer la technique comme opération de la technique +comme dispositif régulateur. C'est à ce second niveau que devient +pensable l'approche archicratique. L'industrialisation doit alors se +lire moins comme histoire des outils que comme histoire de leur mise en +ordre, de leur canalisation sociale et de leur normalisation productive. +Elle correspond à l'instauration d'un régime de viabilité structuré +autour d'un triptyque : formes d'institution du monde (arcalité), +modalités d'imposition de la puissance (cratialité), dispositifs de +stabilisation régulatrice (archicration). Sans ce triptyque, il n'y a +pas encore révolution industrielle, mais seulement des inventions +techniques privées de portée politique durable. + +Avant de modéliser les quatre grandes phases que la doxa désigne comme +"révolutions industrielles", il faut toutefois rappeler un point décisif +: la pluralité des temporalités techno-régulatrices. Aucune des +mutations industrielles ne se produit dans un temps homogène, universel, +linéaire. Le récit linéaire, quasi-légendaire, selon lequel l'Angleterre +invente, l'Europe généralise, le monde suit, est une image d'épinal. La +diffusion d'un dispositif industriel ne suit jamais un seul axe de +propagation, mais s'inscrit dans des hétérochronies, des zones de +friction, des sédimentations différenciées selon les régimes +symboliques, politiques et économiques locaux. + +Ainsi, au sein même d'une période donnée — disons, la deuxième +révolution industrielle — coexistent des régimes +arcalo-cratialo-archicratiques très différents selon les lieux : ce que +l'on observe dans la Ruhr ne correspond pas à ce qui se joue au Japon, à +Buenos Aires ou en URSS. Penser l'industrialisation comme régime +archicratique, c'est donc la désoccidentaliser, la désynchroniser et la +dénaturaliser comme évidence historique. L'enjeu devient alors moins de +décrire une série de faits techniques que de cartographier une pluralité +de régimes de régulation qui se recomposent, s'affrontent, s'imitent ou +se parasitent. La notion même de "révolution" devient alors suspecte : +trop brutale, trop unifiante, trop idéologique. Nous lui préférons celle +de *recomposition régulatoire tensionnelle*. + +Cette approche ne surplombe pourtant pas son objet depuis une grille +conceptuelle arbitraire. Elle s'inscrit dans un héritage critique +exigeant. Lewis Mumford avait déjà montré, dans *Technique and +Civilization* (1934), que l'âge de la machine commence moins avec la +vapeur qu'avec la régulation horaire et la domestication du rythme +corporel. Simondon invitait à penser la technique comme milieu associé ; +André Gorz rappelait que l'entrée dans la société industrielle engage +d'abord une normalisation de la subjectivité productive ; Bruno Latour, +enfin, a contribué à décrire les technologies comme actrices de +régulations inscrites dans des réseaux hybrides de pouvoir. + +Nous proposons donc une lecture archicratique soutenue de +l'industrialisation, non pour épuiser à elle seule l'intelligibilité du +phénomène, mais pour dégager les régimes de sens, de pouvoir et de +normativité que les dispositifs techniques ont portés, institués, +stabilisés ou rendus invisibles. Chaque révolution industrielle sera lue +comme une recomposition de notre triptyque fondamental — arcalité, +cratialité, archicration — plutôt que comme une simple séquence +d'innovations. + +## **4.2 — Première révolution industrielle (1780–1850) : proto-archicration de l'ordre mécanisé** + +On a trop souvent raconté la première révolution industrielle comme une +épopée de la vapeur, comme l'histoire d'inventeurs et d'entrepreneurs, +comme l'avènement d'une modernité productive où l'homme, armé de science +et de machine, aurait enfin accru sa maîtrise de la nature. La trame +narrative dominante — des métiers à tisser mécaniques aux mines de +charbon, des usines textiles de Manchester aux locomotives de Stephenson — se déploie comme une fresque de conquête technique, d'accélération +économique et d'innovation sociale. Pourtant, ce récit linéaire, épique +et téléologique ne parvient pas à penser ce qui s'est véritablement +instauré dans cette phase fondatrice de l'ère industrielle : moins une +multiplication d'artefacts qu'un nouveau régime de régulation du monde, +à la fois structuré, disciplinaire, conflictuel et encore fragile + +Ce que nous appelons ici « première révolution industrielle » doit être +repensé comme l'émergence d'une configuration régulatoire nouvelle. Nous +n'avons pas affaire à un simple saut quantitatif de la production, mais +à une recomposition des conditions de viabilité collective, dans +laquelle temps, corps, contrat, geste, fatigue, norme et espace sont +redistribués. Cette phase — que nous situons entre 1780 et 1850 — doit ainsi être lue comme une proto-archicration : une scène encore +instable, fragmentaire et conflictuelle, où la régulation industrielle +cherche ses formes avant leur codification plus étatique dans les +décennies suivantes. + +La section analysera cette proto-archicration mécanisée selon trois +temps distincts mais intégrés : une arcalité disciplinaire, faite de +temps uniformisé, d'espaces clos et de rythmes segmentés ; une +cratialité extractive, centrée sur l'effort canalisé, l'obéissance +incorporée et la force productivisée ; une archicration fondatrice, où +émergent le contrat, le salaire et la norme, et où l'ordre industriel +commence à se donner comme totalité régulatrice. Nous prolongerons cette +lecture par un cas paradigmatique, celui de Manchester, avant d'en +dégager les tensions, instabilités et apories propres. + +### *4.2.1 — Cadre de départ : repolitiser la révolution industrielle anglaise* + +Trop décrite, commémorée et canonisée, la révolution industrielle +anglaise a fini par se recouvrir de ses propres mythes. Le récit +dominant, construit entre la fin du XIXe et le milieu du XXe siècle, +s'est longtemps concentré sur un triptyque devenu dogme : la machine à +vapeur, l'industrie textile, le charbon. C'est ainsi que les manuels +scolaires, les grands récits économiques et les expositions universelles +ont façonné un imaginaire de la modernité fondé sur la puissance +technique, l'inventivité entrepreneuriale et la maîtrise progressive des +ressources naturelles. Or, cette narration, que l'on retrouve chez des +figures aussi influentes que David S. Landes (*The Unbound Prometheus*, +1969), Joel Mokyr (*The Lever of Riches*, 1990), repose sur plusieurs +présupposés majeurs : linéarité causale, universalisme occidental, +neutralité de la technique, économie pensée comme moteur premier de +l'histoire. + +Ces auteurs, bien que parfois critiques à l'égard du capitalisme, +participent néanmoins d'un même paradigme que l'on pourrait qualifier de +fonctionnaliste-accélérationniste. Selon ce cadre, la révolution +industrielle est pensée comme un processus d'accumulation de gains de +productivité, rendu possible par des innovations techniques et des +structures institutionnelles adaptées à leur mise en œuvre. L'histoire y +est pensée en termes de mouvement, de croissance et de rendement ; le +progrès s'y confond avec la vitesse. Les apports empiriques de cette +historiographie sont considérables — notamment en ce qui concerne la +chronologie des inventions, les dynamiques du marché du travail ou les +politiques d'exportation technologique — ce qui lui manque, en +revanche, c'est une pensée rigoureuse de la régulation. Car ce qu'elle +laisse dans l'ombre, c'est la manière dont les sociétés ont rendu +possible leur viabilité dans et par l'industrialisation : *quels types +de corps, de normes, de temporalités et de subjectivités ont dû être +produits, imposés et légitimés pour qu'une machine ne soit pas +simplement un artefact, mais un opérateur d'ordre ?* + +C'est à cette lacune, à la fois épistémologique et politique, que nous +nous attachons ici. Car nous faisons l'hypothèse que la révolution +industrielle, dans sa première phase, est d'abord l'instauration d'un +régime disciplinaire de la productivité. Il faut l'entendre comme +l'émergence d'un mode de régulation spécifique, plutôt que comme un +ordre simplement imposé par la brutalité, où la production répétée, +segmentée, quantifiée, mesurée du travail humain devient la clé de voûte +de la viabilité collective. Ce n'est pas l'abondance des techniques qui +produit l'industrie, c'est la mise en place d'un dispositif de +synchronisation, de canalisation et de normativité qui permet à ces +techniques d'être stabilisées, répétées, généralisées, opérantes. +Autrement dit, l'infrastructure industrielle est d'abord une +infrastructure régulatoire, et non uniquement matérielle. + +Nous appelons proto-archicration cette configuration émergente. Le +préfixe *proto-* indique que nous avons affaire à une forme naissante, +partielle, encore instable de régulation archicratique. Celle-ci ne +dispose pas encore d'un État organisé autour d'un projet industriel +centralisé. Elle ne s'incarne pas dans un appareil bureaucratique +normatif, ni dans une ingénierie sociale pleinement développée. Elle +réside dans un ensemble de dispositifs discontinus mais convergents : +l'atelier transformé en fabrique, la fabrique transformée en usine ; la +mesure du temps devenue discipline ; le contrat salarial émergent ; les +premières tentatives de juridicisation du travail ; les premiers +contremaîtres, les premières normes, les premières résistances. La +proto-archicration désigne donc cette phase où l'industrialisation +devient régulation du monde sans encore pouvoir se nommer comme telle. + +Le choix d'inscrire cette proto-archicration dans une période allant de +1780 à 1850 ne relève pas d'un arbitraire. Il est fondé sur des repères +précis, à la fois historiographiques et régulatoires. 1780 marque le +début de l'accélération des innovations techniques, avec l'amélioration +de la machine à vapeur par James Watt, la généralisation de la +mule-jenny, la montée en puissance des manufactures textiles, notamment +autour de Manchester. Mais c'est surtout à partir de cette date que les +formes d'organisation du travail commencent à se codifier durablement, +que la synchronisation horaire devient impératif collectif, que le +rapport salarial se sédimente comme condition de survie. De l'autre côté +de la séquence, la décennie 1840–1850 marque plusieurs seuils +régulateurs décisifs : les Factory Acts de 1833 et 1847 en Angleterre, +la montée des luttes ouvrières, la généralisation du discours hygiéniste +et productiviste, mais aussi, à l'échelle européenne, les insurrections +de 1848, qui signent la fin d'une époque d'institution informelle de la +régulation, et le début d'une institutionnalisation partielle du social +par l'État. + +Entre ces deux bornes, la première révolution industrielle apparaît +ainsi non comme un moment inaugural ou héroïque, mais comme une matrice +d'instauration régulatoire, où les tensions entre techniques, pouvoirs, +normes, subjectivités et temporalités coagulées donnent naissance à une +nouvelle scène du monde : l'atelier mécanisé comme espace de discipline, +la fabrique comme opérateur d'obéissance, le salaire comme modalité +d'assujettissement. L'archicration s'y cherche, tâtonne, s'impose. Elle +n'est pas encore nommée, mais elle agit. Elle commence. + +### 4.2.2 — *Arcalité disciplinaire : temps usinier, espace cloisonné, rythmes imposés* + +Au-delà de la mécanique, du charbon ou des machines textiles, la +première révolution industrielle institue une transformation radicale du +régime d'institution du monde. L'enjeu n'est pas simplement technique : +il est cosmo-anthropologique. Ce qui bascule, c'est l'*arcalité* — ce +tissu invisible de structuration du réel qui articule les perceptions du +temps, de l'espace, du geste et de la signification. L'arcalité, dans +notre grille régulatoire, désigne en effet l'ensemble des formes +instituées d'*agencement du monde* : modalités temporelles, spatialités +légitimes, symboliques opérantes, schémas du pensable. Or, +l'industrialisation n'installe pas seulement des infrastructures +techniques : elle redéfinit les conditions de possibilité de l'existence +collective. + +L'histoire dominante s'est trop souvent arrêtée aux objets visibles — vapeur, filature, sidérurgie — sans interroger la transformation +profonde des manières d'habiter le temps, l'espace et le corps. C'est +pourtant là, dans la mutation de l'expérience régulée du monde, que +s'opère la bascule archicratique. Dès les années 1780–1830, la fabrique +anglaise n'est pas seulement un lieu de production : elle devient un +dispositif d'encodage du réel, une matrice régulatrice dans laquelle le +temps, l'espace et le geste sont restructurés à travers une logique +disciplinaire inédite. Ce régime, que nous nommons arcalité +disciplinaire, opère selon quatre axes intégrés : + +- Temporalité uniforme et mesurable, imposée par l'horloge, la cadence, + la productivité. + +- Spatialité cloisonnée et hiérarchisée, articulée autour du contrôle + visuel et de la segmentation fonctionnelle. + +- Gestuelle contrainte et mécanisée, standardisée à la logique cyclique + de la machine. + +- Symbolique productiviste du monde, où l'imaginaire communautaire est + dissous dans un temps calculatoire. + +Peu visible en elle-même, elle structure pourtant l'ensemble : rythmes +du travail, division des rôles, organisation de l'effort, ancrage des +gestes, perception du réel. Pour en saisir la portée, il faut défaire +les couches d'illusion technicienne et poser un diagnostic plus profond +: celui d'une reconfiguration ontologique du monde vécu. + +Plus précisément, l'enjeu n'est pas seulement que le temps change de +forme, mais qu'il change de fonction régulatrice : il cesse d'être le +milieu pluriel d'une existence rythmée pour devenir l'instrument +homogène d'une extraction gouvernable. + +La première grande inflexion arcale de la modernité industrielle s'est +jouée dans la temporalité plus encore que dans la machine. Edward P. +Thompson, dans son texte fondamental *Time, Work-Discipline and +Industrial Capitalism* (1967), démontrait déjà que la transformation du +temps de travail n'était pas un sous-produit de la technique, mais un +opérateur culturel, moral, politique. Le passage du « *temps de tâche* » — souple, communautaire, saisonnier — au « *temps d'horloge* » — linéaire, mesuré, quantifié — marque l'émergence d'un temps +productiviste intériorisé, condition de la viabilité du capitalisme +industriel. + +Le point décisif, pour notre propos, est donc moins la transformation +technique du temps que sa conversion en opérateur de discipline +généralisée. + +Dans les manufactures anglaises des années 1790 à 1830, notamment dans +les usines textiles du Lancashire et de Nottinghamshire, l'horaire +ouvrier dépasse couramment les 70 heures hebdomadaires. Le Factory Act +de 1833, tout en tentant d'encadrer le travail des enfants, laisse +inchangée cette temporalité compressée, qui devient la norme implicite +du rendement. L'horloge murale devient organe de commandement ; les +sirènes scandent les transitions ; les registres de pointage imposent la +visibilité du temps sur chaque corps. + +Ce régime de synchronisation n'est pas seulement logistique : il est +ontologique. L'individu n'habite plus un temps sacré ou cyclique — *celui des fêtes, des moissons, des dimanches, des saisons* — mais un +temps linéaire, abstrait, téléologique, que Reinhart Koselleck désignera +comme temps moderne orienté vers le futur (*Vergangene Zukunft*, 1979). +Ce temps n'est plus habité : il est traversé, mesuré, exploité. Jacques +Le Goff, dans *Pour un autre Moyen Âge* (1977), rappelait à quel point +le temps liturgique médiéval était plural : jours saints, pauses +rituelles, semaines non travaillées. L'arcalité disciplinaire dissout +ces épaisseurs, non par décret, mais par naturalisation régulatoire : +l'horloge devient plus impérieuse que la cloche, le poste de travail +plus sacré que l'autel. + +Thompson souligne ainsi que la « *morale temporelle* » capitaliste n'est +pas seulement imposée : elle est intériorisée comme forme de vertu +civique, fondée sur la ponctualité, l'exactitude, l'assiduité. Le temps +devient non seulement le cadre de l'action, mais aussi la mesure de la +valeur humaine : la ponctualité tend à valoir comme preuve d'existence +sociale, le retard comme signe d'échec. L'arcalité devient ainsi +discipline du souffle, *discipline de la durée*, *discipline de +l'attention*. + +Le second pilier de l'arcalité disciplinaire, aussi fondamental que la +synchronisation temporelle, réside dans l'agencement de l'espace +productif. La fabrique ne se contente pas d'abriter les machines : elle +constitue un dispositif régulateur spatialement configuré, où le +contrôle, la segmentation et la hiérarchisation façonnent une +micro-architecture du pouvoir. La spatialité industrielle ne relève donc +pas de la seule fonctionnalité : elle est aussi politique, symbolique et +archicratique. + +Michel Foucault, dans *Surveiller et punir* (1975), a magistralement +saisi la fabrique comme l'un des prototypes de l'espace disciplinaire +moderne — aux côtés de la caserne, de la prison, de l'école. Il écrit +: « L'espace disciplinaire tend vers l'organisation d'un champ +analytique. Les individus y sont localisés, formés, rendus productifs, +transformés » (p. 172). Cette logique se matérialise dès les premières +manufactures textiles anglaises : les ateliers sont alignés, les postes +délimités, les circulations canalisées, les corps assignés à résidence +productive. Chaque ouvrier est visibilisé, surveillé, rendu opératoire +dans une géométrie du rendement. + +L'organisation de l'espace répond à une grammaire implicite : voir sans +être vu, contrôler sans relâche, isoler sans séparer. Comme l'ont +souligné Maxine Berg et Pat Hudson dans *The Industrial Revolution in +Britain* (1992), la construction des usines du nord de l'Angleterre — notamment à Cromford, Manchester ou New Lanark — repose sur des +principes explicites de division fonctionnelle de l'espace, optimisation +de la lumière naturelle, mobilité restreinte des corps, surélévation du +contremaître. Il s'agit non seulement de produire des biens, mais de +produire des comportements. L'espace devient une pédagogie incorporée de +l'obéissance. + +À cette spatialité régulée s'ajoute une autre forme de violence +symbolique : l'effacement de l'extérieur. Le travailleur, enfermé dans +l'enceinte de la fabrique, est soustrait à la rue, au village, au ciel, +au cycle du jour. Les hautes fenêtres laissent entrer la lumière, mais +non la vue. Le dehors n'existe plus que comme horizon de fatigue. +L'espace est désormais intégré au temps : il devient surface de +rendement par mètre carré. + +Mais c'est dans la chair même du travail que s'inscrit l'arcalité +disciplinaire : le corps ouvrier devient support de régulation, vecteur +d'effort mesurable, organe d'interface avec la machine. Là où l'artisan +maîtrisait encore le cycle du geste et l'intention de l'œuvre, l'ouvrier +de la fabrique est exproprié de son geste, assigné à une séquence +fonctionnelle, répétitive, vidée de toute intentionnalité créative. + +Lewis Mumford, dans *Technics and Civilization* (1934), souligne que +l'effet le plus profond de la machine n'est pas la puissance +énergétique, mais la déqualification du geste humain. Il note : « +L'homme devient auxiliaire d'un rythme qui ne vient plus de lui. » Ce +rythme, imprimé par l'arbre de transmission, par la vapeur, par le cycle +mécanique, impose un nouveau rapport au corps : le muscle devient +moteur, la posture devient contrainte, la fatigue devient calculable. + +Cette codification gestuelle s'observe dans les premiers manuels de +formation ouvrière — comme les *Rules for the Discipline of the Mill* +(1821) — où sont spécifiés les postes à tenir, les fautes à éviter, +les gestes à répéter. Toute dérive est une perte : perte de production, +perte de discipline, perte de contrôle. Le corps doit être tenu, mesuré, +plié à la logique de la machine. Il devient technologiquement régulé +avant d'être technologiquement remplacé. + +Ce processus n'est pas naturel : il est institué. Il s'inscrit dans une +logique de soumission corporelle, où l'effort n'est plus librement +consenti, mais requis, calibré, normé. L'intelligence du geste est +supprimée au profit de l'exécution sans surplus. L'archicratie +industrielle passe ici par le contrôle fin des rythmes corporels, par la +standardisation du souffle, par l'exclusion de toute autonomie +gestuelle. + +Mais cette régulation ne serait pas archicratique si elle ne s'attaquait +aussi à la symbolique du monde vécu. L'arcalité disciplinaire désactive +les régimes symboliques préindustriels : elle efface les rituels, +désynchronise les fêtes, vide les jours de leur texture. Là où le temps +s'inscrivait dans une narration sacrée — avec ses sabbats, ses +saisons, ses rites de passage — il devient fonctionnel, plat, +programmable. + +Karl Polanyi, dans *La Grande Transformation* (1944), appelle cela le +*désencastrement* : le temps, le travail, la terre — naguère +enveloppés de significations collectives — deviennent des marchandises +fictives, détachées de tout enracinement. Le dimanche devient jour de +fatigue. Le cycle lunaire, indicateur de moisson, devient résidu +folklorique. Le calendrier grégorien est absorbé par le *planning +productif*. Il ne reste plus de l'ancien monde qu'un rythme désarticulé, +converti en intervalle logistique. + +Cette symbolique arrachée n'est pas un détail : elle fonde une ontologie +de la perte, un vide que l'arcalité industrielle comble par une autre +sacralité — celle de la productivité, du rendement, de l'utilité. Là +où le jour était tissé de prières, de chants, de pauses, il devient +compartiment d'efficacité, valeur horaire, cycle d'usure. C'est là que +s'opère le noyau dur de l'archicration industrielle future : le monde +devient usine, le monde devient *programme*, le monde devient cadence +régulée sans transcendance. + +### 4.2.3 — *Cratialité extractive* : fragmentation du geste, privatisation du pouvoir, marchandisation de l'effort + +La première révolution industrielle ne met pas seulement en place une +nouvelle organisation du temps et une spatialisation productive du +travail : elle inaugure une modalité inédite de la puissance, au sens +strict du grec *kratos* — la force, la domination, l'acte de +soumission effective. Cette modalité n'émane ni de l'État ni d'un +souverain transcendant ; elle procède d'un opérateur privé, diffus, +entrepreneurialisé, enchâssé dans l'économie de l'usine. Émerge ainsi +une *cratialité extractive* : régime d'imposition du geste, de l'effort, +du souffle, du muscle, visant à transformer l'énergie humaine en output +mécanique mesurable, sans autre légitimation que le rendement. Ce régime +de pouvoir n'est ni symbolique ni simplement administratif : il est +régulatoire au sens fort — c'est-à-dire qu'il configure les conditions +d'expression, de circulation et d'extraction de la puissance d'agir +humaine. Il gouverne par application directe à la substance corporelle +du travail vivant, bien plus que par représentation. En cela, la +cratialité extractive doit être comprise comme une modalité +d'administration des forces. Là où l'arcalité disciplinaire reconfigure +le monde du pensable, la cratialité extractive s'empare de la matière +vivante elle-même : elle la saisit, la plie, l'épuise, l'ordonne. + +Dans notre modélisation, elle désigne les modalités d'exercice du +pouvoir sous forme d'imposition pratique. Elle est *le régime de la +contrainte incarnée* : ses opérateurs ne sont pas toujours visibles +(chefs, lois, polices), mais ses effets sont tangibles — fatigue, +reddition, docilité, cadence. Ce que la première usine invente, ce n'est +pas la force mécanique en soi, mais *la technique d'asservissement +différenciée de la force humaine à la puissance machinique*. Il ne +s'agit plus seulement de faire produire : il s'agit de *faire produire +plus vite, plus longtemps, plus identiquement*, à moindre coût, sans +remise en question, et sous une architecture de surveillance informelle +mais constante. C'est le règne de l'effort capté. + +Cette cratialité peut être déployée selon trois volets formant une +architecture régulatoire interconnectée : + +- Désintégration du geste total et fragmentation de l'effort + +- Codification disciplinaire de l'obéissance productive + +- Privatisation du commandement et généralisation du pouvoir + entrepreneurial + +Le premier mouvement de cette *cratialité extractive* est *la +désarticulation du geste* : là où l'artisan, dans le régime +pré-industriel, exerçait un travail holistique — depuis la matière +brute jusqu'à la forme finie, dans un continuum de gestes intégrés et +signifiants —, l'ouvrier de fabrique voit son corps éclaté en +*fonctions techniques partielles*. La gestualité cesse d'être une +compétence : elle devient une *brique fonctionnelle dans un système +mécanique plus vaste*. Ce que Mauss appelait « techniques du corps » +(1934) devient, dans l'usine, *morceau de chaîne*, interchangeable, +remplaçable, quantifiable. Dans leur diversité ethnographique, les +techniques du corps s'intégraient à un monde de sens — marche, port, +prière, combat ; la fabrique industrielle, elle, désymbolise ces gestes +pour les aligner sur des standards de performance strictement +mécanistes. Le corps devient opérateur sans mémoire ni ritualité. + +Dans les filatures mécaniques de type Arkwright ou Cromford, la « +spinner girl » (fileuse), assignée à sa rangée de broches, répète +inlassablement les mêmes gestes : insérer, tirer, relancer le fil, +corriger un enchevêtrement. Chaque geste est conditionné par le rythme +de la machine, non par une intention propre. À la Smithies, dans les +aciéries de Sheffield, les manœuvres se succèdent sans jamais voir +l'objet fini. *Le geste est divorcé de son sens.* La substitution +partielle de la main par l'engrenage n'abolit pas le corps — elle le +*redéfinit comme relais contraint*. + +Cette déqualification massive a été relevée dès le XIXe siècle par +Friedrich Engels, dans *La Situation de la classe laborieuse en +Angleterre* (1845), où il observe : « Chaque ouvrier est réduit à n'être +qu'un fragment vivant de machine, assigné à un mouvement stupide, répété +toute la journée » (trad. fr., p. 88). Plus tard, Harry Braverman dans +*Labour and Monopoly Capital* (1974), théorisera cette tendance comme +*dépossession du savoir ouvrier*, c'est-à-dire comme réduction du +travail à sa plus simple expression opératoire, facilitant la +substitution, l'échange, la menace. Comme nous le verrons plus tard, ce +paradigme trouvera son aboutissement normatif dans la rationalisation +taylorienne du début du XXe siècle, où l'ouvrier devient un exécutant +sans latitude, assigné à un geste optimisé par calcul externe. Dès lors, +la performance n'est plus un effet de compétence, mais une résultante de +calibrage. L'archétype du "*temps standard*" scellera cette dépossession +gestuelle. + +Car oui, cette logique est directement liée au mode de rationalité +industrielle émergent : il ne s'agit pas d'organiser le travail autour +des hommes, mais de *calibrer les hommes pour le travail, pour les +machines*. L'effort devient *matériau brut*, à exploiter au plus près de +son seuil d'épuisement. Les corps sont alignés non pour coopérer, mais +pour *mimer une coopération machinique*. Ce que l'on extrait n'est pas +une œuvre, mais une *force de travail pure*, arrachée à ses finalités +subjectives. + +La fragmentation du geste ne suffit pourtant pas à faire fonctionner la +fabrique ; elle exige un second pilier : la codification minutieuse de +l'obéissance. Car produire dans un système désintégratif, mécanisé, +hiérarchisé, suppose une discipline constante — non pas seulement au +sens moral, mais comme *structure d'incitation, de surveillance et de +punition*. C'est ici que s'affirme le cœur de la *cratialité extractive* +: une forme de pouvoir sans transcendance, immédiate, diffusée, +technique, incorporée dans les gestes, dans les rythmes, dans les +interactions. + +Dans les usines textiles de Manchester ou de Birmingham au tournant du +XIXe siècle, la présence du contremaître devient centrale. Mais son +autorité n'est ni militaire ni institutionnelle : elle est +*productiviste*. Il ne commande pas parce qu'il détient un pouvoir +politique, mais parce qu'il garantit la continuité de la production. Il +surveille le temps, les gestes, les pauses. Il inflige des retenues de +salaire, réprimande un ralentissement, menace d'une exclusion immédiate. +Ce pouvoir n'est pas hiérarchique selon la logique du droit public : il +est régulé fonctionnellement par la chaîne de valeur productive. Sa +verticalité est téléologique, orienté vers la minimisation de la perte +temporelle, et non vers une expression de souveraineté. + +C'est ici qu'intervient un glissement fondamental dans l'histoire de la +souveraineté : *l'autorité productive remplace l'autorité politique*. +L'obéissance ne s'adresse plus d'abord à un roi ou à une loi, mais à une +machine, à un cycle, à une chaîne — et aux hommes chargés d'en assurer +le bon fonctionnement. Ce phénomène, fort bien décrit par Michel +Foucault dans ses cours au Collège de France (notamment *Naissance de la +biopolitique*, 1978-79), inaugure un pouvoir sans visage, sans +solennité, sans scène, *mais d'autant plus effectif qu'il est ancré dans +les besoins quotidiens*. On ne discute pas le contremaître comme on +conteste un préfet : on dépend de lui pour manger, pour survivre. + +Les règlements internes d'usine deviennent à ce titre les premiers +*codes craticiels* de l'ère industrielle. Ils définissent avec une +précision maniaque les horaires, les fautes, les interdictions, les +peines. Le règlement de la *Lowell Mill* (Massachusetts, 1822) stipule +que trois retards valent un renvoi ; celui de la *Saltaire Mill* +(Yorkshire, 1837) impose une amende pour toute parole inutile échappée +pendant le travail. Ces micro-normes codifient une nouvelle économie +morale : *l'ouvrier n'est plus sujet, mais segment d'un flux productif à +maintenir stable et rentable*. L'obéissance devient un critère de +valeur. + +C'est cette *discipline par la menace du chômage* qui constitue l'un des +moteurs profonds de la cratialité extractive. Le travailleur ne craint +plus un maître, il craint *l'inemployabilité*. Et cette peur est +d'autant plus puissante qu'elle est entretenue par la division du +travail : chacun est substituable, chacun est duplicable. L'effet n'est +pas seulement social — il est psychique : *l'ouvrier devient son +propre surveillant*, intégré à une logique d'auto-contrôle qui précède +de plus d'un siècle les thèses du management moderne. + +Ce que Polanyi appellera plus tard *le marché du travail fictif* (La +Grande Transformation, 1944) prend ici une forme très concrète : on fait +*circuler l'effort* comme une marchandise. La force humaine devient +quantifiable, tarifée, échangeable, et donc, *soumise à la menace +permanente d'obsolescence*. L'ouvrier doit s'auto-calibrer, +s'auto-discipliner, s'auto-forcer. Le commandement est moins extérieur +qu'intériorisé. + +Ainsi, *la soumission cratiale ne passe pas seulement par la +coercition*, mais par une ingénierie diffuse des peurs, des attentes, +des ambitions miniatures. On ne travaille plus pour faire œuvre — on +travaille pour ne pas disparaître. Le rendement devient salut. La +productivité devient dignité. Et l'effort, naguère honneur du corps, +devient *exigence silencieuse de la structure*. + +La cratialité extractive qui s'impose dans les premières fabriques +industrielles anglaises repose sur un paradoxe essentiel : le pouvoir +n'y est ni étatique, ni transcendant, ni institutionnellement stabilisé, +mais il est pour autant d'une efficacité redoutable. Cette puissance +productive ne se déploie pas à partir d'un centre de souveraineté formel +; elle s'incarne dans des figures banales, parfois invisibles, de +gestion, de contrôle, de pilotage local — le patron, le contremaître, +l'investisseur, le régisseur. Autrement dit, la révolution industrielle +n'institue pas un pouvoir vertical d'État sur les corps laborieux, mais +une cratialité entrepreneuriale, privée, atomisée, fonctionnelle, fondée +sur l'organisation de l'extraction. + +À la différence des formes de pouvoir monarchique, bureaucratique ou +théologico-politique, la cratialité industrielle naissante ne repose ni +sur un principe de légitimité transcendante, ni sur une codification +juridique universelle. Elle procède d'une logique d'efficience : celui +qui garantit la production décide ; celui qui fait travailler, commande +; celui qui organise le rendement, gouverne sans en avoir le titre. +Cette délégation du commandement à l'entrepreneur, que Max Weber +analysera plus tard dans *Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft* (1922) comme une +forme de rationalisation fonctionnelle, préfigure déjà la dissociation +entre autorité légitime et autorité opérationnelle. Le pouvoir devient +*réseau, outil, mécanisme* : il ne dit plus, il fait faire. + +Cette dynamique est particulièrement visible dans les dispositifs +patronaux de type paternaliste — comme ceux de Robert Owen à New +Lanark, de Titus Salt à Saltaire, ou des familles Peel et Strutt dans le +Derbyshire. Le patron y assume un rôle de régulateur global : il loge, +surveille, réprimande, éduque, moralise. Mais ce rôle ne relève pas d'un +mandat public. Il est *propriétaire du sol, de l'usine, des machines, +des maisons, et par extension, des corps*. Cette privatisation du +pouvoir est sans précédent dans l'histoire européenne moderne : elle +transfère à l'entrepreneur la capacité de déterminer le quotidien, le +temps, la norme, la règle, le seuil de tolérance. Ce pouvoir n'est pas +juridiquement institué, mais économiquement advenu : il procède de la +conjonction entre propriété privée des moyens de production et +dépendance vitale des individus au revenu de subsistance. Il en résulte +une capacité normative sans inscription étatique, que nous pouvons +qualifier de souveraineté d'usage, sans reconnaissance symbolique. + +Comme le souligne l'historienne Emma Griffin dans *Liberty's Dawn: A +People's History of the Industrial Revolution* (2013), ce pouvoir privé +s'est étendu par la simple logique du marché, sans qu'aucune révolution +juridique ou politique ne vienne l'encadrer véritablement. Ce n'est +qu'au milieu du XIXe siècle, avec la montée des luttes ouvrières et +l'extension partielle du droit du travail (notamment avec le *Factory +Act* de 1847), que l'État commence timidement à réintégrer la régulation +cratiale. Mais jusque-là, la gouvernance des efforts, des gestes, des +rythmes est entièrement confiée au capital privé. + +Nous touchons ici l'une des spécificités structurantes de la cratialité +industrielle naissante : elle est anti-étatique dans sa genèse, mais +hyper-normative dans ses effets. C'est-à-dire qu'elle ne naît pas d'un +projet de gouvernement centralisé, mais d'une dynamique localisée +d'optimisation du rendement — et pourtant, elle façonne l'existence +des individus dans ses moindres détails : horaires, tenues, attitudes, +pauses, sanctions, gestes, respiration même. En ce sens, elle préfigure +les futurs régimes de gouvernance algorithmique : pouvoir diffus, +omniprésent, sans sujet identifiable, mais dont la contrainte est +maximale. + +La révolution industrielle ne centralise pas le pouvoir ; elle le +distribue. Elle invente un mode de domination sans autorité formelle, +mais d'une redoutable efficacité. Ce que Foucault appelait une +"microphysique du pouvoir" (1975), se déploie ici à grande échelle : non +pas un grand souverain, mais des milliers de petits agents du rendement, +porteurs d'une rationalité disciplinaire incorporée, diffuse, +économique. + +En cela, le capitalisme industriel du XIXe siècle marque une inflexion +majeure dans l'histoire des pouvoirs : il privatise la régulation des +corps, externalise l'obéissance, délègue la souveraineté à la logique +productive. Et c'est pourquoi, dans notre lecture archicratique, cette +cratialité extractive doit être pensée comme forme autonome de +régulation, irréductible à l'appareil d'État, mais capable de produire +des effets de domination systémique, étendus, permanents. + +Au terme de cette exploration de la cratialité extractive telle qu'elle +se déploie dans la première révolution industrielle, il nous faut +affronter ce qui en constitue le noyau opératoire : la réduction de +l'effort humain à une ressource exploitable, quantifiable, ajustable — à la fois source d'énergie, unité de calcul et cible de contrôle. Entre +1780 et 1850 se met en place, dans les fabriques anglaises puis +européennes, une mutation anthropotechnique : le corps n'est plus +seulement instrument, il devient mesure. L'effort n'est plus simplement +requis, il est organisé, prélevé, converti en valeur. Cette conversion suppose une triple opération de régulation. -D’abord, une objectivation du travail corporel, c’est-à-dire sa transformation en entité mesurable et échangeable. Le corps ouvrier devient producteur de « force de travail », pour reprendre la terminologie de Marx dans *Le Capital* (1867), mais cette force est désormais traitée comme un flux énergétique à optimiser. L’effort cesse d’être perçu comme dépense humaine ou sacrifice subjectif : il devient variable de rendement. Dans les premiers traités d’économie politique industrielle, tels ceux de Nassau William Senior ou de Andrew Ure (*The Philosophy of Manufactures*, 1835), le travail est défini en termes d’utilité, de production nette, de "surplus de performance". On commence à mesurer la productivité par tête, la cadence par minute, la rentabilité par poste — autant d’indices d’une mutation anthropo-énergétique majeure. +D'abord, une objectivation du travail corporel, c'est-à-dire sa +transformation en entité mesurable et échangeable. Le corps ouvrier +devient producteur de « force de travail », pour reprendre la +terminologie de Marx dans *Le Capital* (1867), mais cette force est +désormais traitée comme un flux énergétique à optimiser. L'effort cesse +d'être perçu comme dépense humaine ou sacrifice subjectif : il devient +variable de rendement. Dans les premiers traités d'économie politique +industrielle, tels ceux de Nassau William Senior ou de Andrew Ure (*The +Philosophy of Manufactures*, 1835), le travail est défini en termes +d'utilité, de production nette, de "surplus de performance". On commence +à mesurer la productivité par tête, la cadence par minute, la +rentabilité par poste — autant d'indices d'une mutation +anthropo-énergétique majeure. -Ensuite, une infrastructure de captation et de conversion se déploie. Cette économie de l’effort suppose des instruments de suivi, de consignation, de calcul : feuilles de pointage, bilans horaires, unités produites, grilles d’évaluation, et bientôt — à la fin du siècle — chronophotographie, ergonomie, biométrie naissante. Le geste devient donnée, l’épuisement devient signal d’inefficacité. Cette logique est déjà à l’œuvre dans les règlements des usines textiles ou sidérurgiques dès les années 1820 : toute baisse de cadence, tout arrêt imprévu, tout "temps mort" y est suspect, traqué, réprimé. L’effort ne doit pas seulement être fourni — il doit être constamment aligné sur une norme implicite de maximisation. +Ensuite, une infrastructure de captation et de conversion se déploie. +Cette économie de l'effort suppose des instruments de suivi, de +consignation, de calcul : feuilles de pointage, bilans horaires, unités +produites, grilles d'évaluation, et bientôt — à la fin du siècle — chronophotographie, ergonomie, biométrie naissante. Le geste devient +donnée, l'épuisement devient signal d'inefficacité. Cette logique est +déjà à l'œuvre dans les règlements des usines textiles ou sidérurgiques +dès les années 1820 : toute baisse de cadence, tout arrêt imprévu, tout +"temps mort" y est suspect, traqué, réprimé. L'effort ne doit pas +seulement être fourni — il doit être constamment aligné sur une norme +implicite de maximisation. -Enfin, cette rationalité extractive impose un nouveau rapport à l’épuisement, qui cesse d’être vu comme limite organique pour devenir coût acceptable ou variable ajustable. Les corps se brisent, mais la fabrique continue. Les rapports d’inspection des *Factory Acts* des années 1830–1840 sont accablants : atteintes physiques massives, épuisement précoce, absences non rémunérées, accidents graves. Pourtant, l’infrastructure de production se restructure peu. Ce n’est qu’en 1847 qu’une législation plus ferme (le *Ten Hours Act*) impose une limite légale au travail des femmes et enfants. Jusque-là, la fabrique a opéré comme extracteur d’énergie vivante, sans plafond moral ni régulateur central. +Enfin, cette rationalité extractive impose un nouveau rapport à +l'épuisement, qui cesse d'être vu comme limite organique pour devenir +coût acceptable ou variable ajustable. Les corps se brisent, mais la +fabrique continue. Les rapports d'inspection des *Factory Acts* des +années 1830–1840 sont accablants : atteintes physiques massives, +épuisement précoce, absences non rémunérées, accidents graves. Pourtant, +l'infrastructure de production se restructure peu. Ce n'est qu'en 1847 +qu'une législation plus ferme (le *Ten Hours Act*) impose une limite +légale au travail des femmes et enfants. Jusque-là, la fabrique a opéré +comme extracteur d'énergie vivante, sans plafond moral ni régulateur +central. -Ce processus n’est pas marginal : il est central à la logique archicratique de la première industrialisation. Dans la fabrique, ce n’est pas d’abord le coton ou le charbon que l’on extrait, mais l’effort humain lui-même, transformé en temps, en mouvement, en performance, puis reconverti en valeur monétaire. La force de travail devient le pivot du régime industriel. Elle n’est pas uniquement ressource ; elle est aussi condition de mise en forme du pouvoir. Car extraire l’effort, c’est imposer une norme ; c’est configurer le corps ; c’est discipliner le geste ; c’est installer une scène de domination. Autrement dit, la première industrialisation ne se contente pas d’augmenter la puissance productive : elle redéfinit la forme même de ce qui peut être légitimement prélevé sur les corps. +Ce processus n'est pas marginal : il est central à la logique +archicratique de la première industrialisation. Dans la fabrique, ce +n'est pas d'abord le coton ou le charbon que l'on extrait, mais l'effort +humain lui-même, transformé en temps, en mouvement, en performance, puis +reconverti en valeur monétaire. La force de travail devient le pivot du +régime industriel. Elle n'est pas uniquement ressource ; elle est aussi +condition de mise en forme du pouvoir. Car extraire l'effort, c'est +imposer une norme ; c'est configurer le corps ; c'est discipliner le +geste ; c'est installer une scène de domination. Autrement dit, la +première industrialisation ne se contente pas d'augmenter la puissance +productive : elle redéfinit la forme même de ce qui peut être +légitimement prélevé sur les corps. -On ne gouverne plus ici des territoires, on ne taxe plus seulement des produits, on ne surveille plus d’abord des intentions : c’est le mouvement même de l’humain au travail qui devient l’objet de l’exploitation. La fabrique devient une scène de prélèvement énergétique appliqué au souffle, au muscle et à l’attention. +On ne gouverne plus ici des territoires, on ne taxe plus seulement des +produits, on ne surveille plus d'abord des intentions : c'est le +mouvement même de l'humain au travail qui devient l'objet de +l'exploitation. La fabrique devient une scène de prélèvement énergétique +appliqué au souffle, au muscle et à l'attention. -La révolution industrielle, à ce niveau, est donc beaucoup plus qu’un tournant économique : elle est une métamorphose du rapport à l’effort. Non plus effort consenti dans une éthique du métier, mais effort requis, prévu, calculé, prescrit. Non plus force humaine inscrite dans un tissu de sens — religieux, communautaire, artisanal — mais force rendue abstraite, généralisable, indifférenciée, exploitable. L’homme devient module de rendement. +La révolution industrielle, à ce niveau, est donc beaucoup plus qu'un +tournant économique : elle est une métamorphose du rapport à l'effort. +Non plus effort consenti dans une éthique du métier, mais effort requis, +prévu, calculé, prescrit. Non plus force humaine inscrite dans un tissu +de sens — religieux, communautaire, artisanal — mais force rendue +abstraite, généralisable, indifférenciée, exploitable. L'homme devient +module de rendement. -C’est pourquoi la cratialité de la première révolution industrielle constitue le pivot de l’archicration à venir. Toute régulation future s’appuiera sur cette figure du travailleur extrayant de lui-même une énergie normée. Elle est le socle sur lequel viendront se greffer la codification contractuelle (section suivante), les imaginaires du mérite, la quantification salariale, la flexibilité managériale. +C'est pourquoi la cratialité de la première révolution industrielle +constitue le pivot de l'archicration à venir. Toute régulation future +s'appuiera sur cette figure du travailleur extrayant de lui-même une +énergie normée. Elle est le socle sur lequel viendront se greffer la +codification contractuelle (section suivante), les imaginaires du +mérite, la quantification salariale, la flexibilité managériale. -Une conclusion s’impose ici avec netteté : le pouvoir industriel ne naît ni de l’État, ni de la Loi, ni de la parole. Il émerge dans l’effort extrait, dans la cadence imposée, dans le geste répété, dans la normativité incorporée du rendement. C’est là — dans cette capture silencieuse de la vitalité — que s’installe la première scène cratiale de la modernité industrielle. +Une conclusion s'impose ici avec netteté : le pouvoir industriel ne naît +ni de l'État, ni de la Loi, ni de la parole. Il émerge dans l'effort +extrait, dans la cadence imposée, dans le geste répété, dans la +normativité incorporée du rendement. C'est là — dans cette capture +silencieuse de la vitalité — que s'installe la première scène cratiale +de la modernité industrielle. -### 4.2.4 – *Archicration fondatrice : contrat, salaire, synchronisation normée* +### 4.2.4 — *Archicration fondatrice : contrat, salaire, synchronisation normée* -Après avoir imposé les régimes arcalitaires du temps abstrait et les mécanismes cratiaux d’extraction de l’effort, la Révolution industrielle anglaise institue une nouvelle forme d’arrimage normatif entre pouvoir, travail et monde vécu. Le corps n’est plus seul à être discipliné, ni la force seule à être captée ; c’est désormais la relation même entre l’individu et la production qui se trouve encadrée, rendue *contractuelle*, codifiée, inscrite dans un régime de reconnaissance minimale mais opératoire. À ce point de bifurcation, ce qui se déploie est ce que nous désignons comme *archicration fondatrice* : un régime de régulation instituant, fondé non plus sur la seule domination ni sur la seule structuration du réel, mais sur un processus de légitimation formalisée — fût-elle asymétrique. +Après avoir imposé les régimes arcalitaires du temps abstrait et les +mécanismes cratiaux d'extraction de l'effort, la Révolution industrielle +anglaise institue une nouvelle forme d'arrimage normatif entre pouvoir, +travail et monde vécu. Le corps n'est plus seul à être discipliné, ni la +force seule à être captée ; c'est désormais la relation même entre +l'individu et la production qui se trouve encadrée, rendue +*contractuelle*, codifiée, inscrite dans un régime de reconnaissance +minimale mais opératoire. À ce point de bifurcation, ce qui se déploie +est ce que nous désignons comme *archicration fondatrice* : un régime de +régulation instituant, fondé non plus sur la seule domination ni sur la +seule structuration du réel, mais sur un processus de légitimation +formalisée — fût-elle asymétrique. -Dans notre architecture théorique, *l’archicration* désigne le troisième pôle de la régulation sociopolitique : elle articule *institution, légitimation, formalisation*, là où l’arcalité encadre les formes du pensable et la cratialité organise les formes du faisable. Il ne relève ni du commandement direct propre à la cratialité, ni de la structuration de l’imaginaire propre à l’arcalité ; il prend la forme d’un ordre institué, stabilisé par des instruments symboliques (contrats, lois, normes), dont la performativité repose sur leur capacité à synchroniser l’individuel et le collectif. +Dans notre architecture théorique, *l'archicration* désigne le troisième +pôle de la régulation sociopolitique : elle articule *institution, +légitimation, formalisation*, là où l'arcalité encadre les formes du +pensable et la cratialité organise les formes du faisable. Il ne relève +ni du commandement direct propre à la cratialité, ni de la structuration +de l'imaginaire propre à l'arcalité ; il prend la forme d'un ordre +institué, stabilisé par des instruments symboliques (contrats, lois, +normes), dont la performativité repose sur leur capacité à synchroniser +l'individuel et le collectif. -Or, cette capacité de régulation fondatrice trouve, dans la phase 1780–1850, son premier ancrage dans le *contrat salarial* : non pas le contrat au sens strict d’un acte juridique négocié entre parties égales — ce qu’il ne fut presque jamais —, mais le contrat comme forme instituée de reconnaissance d’un lien, comme modèle d’engagement généralisable, comme *scène codifiée de la relation productive*. +Or, cette capacité de régulation fondatrice trouve, dans la phase +1780–1850, son premier ancrage dans le *contrat salarial* : non pas le +contrat au sens strict d'un acte juridique négocié entre parties égales — ce qu'il ne fut presque jamais —, mais le contrat comme forme +instituée de reconnaissance d'un lien, comme modèle d'engagement +généralisable, comme *scène codifiée de la relation productive*. -Le salariat n’est pas ici une simple modalité d’échange économique ; il constitue l’un des matériaux premiers de l’archicration moderne. Il articule plusieurs dimensions : +Le salariat n'est pas ici une simple modalité d'échange économique ; il +constitue l'un des matériaux premiers de l'archicration moderne. Il +articule plusieurs dimensions : -- une fiction juridique de libre consentement (que les historiens du droit, de Commons à Supiot, ont maintes fois déconstruite) ; +- une fiction juridique de libre consentement (que les historiens du + droit, de Commons à Supiot, ont maintes fois déconstruite) ; -- une rationalisation temporelle de la vie active (comme l’ont montré E.P. Thompson, Norbert Elias ou Edward Higgs) ; +- une rationalisation temporelle de la vie active (comme l'ont montré + E.P. Thompson, Norbert Elias ou Edward Higgs) ; -- une codification du statut social et civique (inclusion conditionnelle dans la société salariale, cf. R. Castel, 1995). +- une codification du statut social et civique (inclusion conditionnelle + dans la société salariale, cf. R. Castel, 1995). -Dans cette perspective, l’archicration fondatrice constitue un moment décisif de la modernité industrielle : elle institue la *reconnaissance contractuelle asymétrique* comme norme, le *salaire différencié* comme outil d’alignement, et la *synchronisation productive* comme infrastructure du vivre-ensemble. Elle transforme un rapport de force brut en un rapport de normes, un rapport de cadences en un rapport de durées codifiées. +Dans cette perspective, l'archicration fondatrice constitue un moment +décisif de la modernité industrielle : elle institue la *reconnaissance +contractuelle asymétrique* comme norme, le *salaire différencié* comme +outil d'alignement, et la *synchronisation productive* comme +infrastructure du vivre-ensemble. Elle transforme un rapport de force +brut en un rapport de normes, un rapport de cadences en un rapport de +durées codifiées. -Dans les usines anglaises du premier XIXe siècle, cette formalisation prend plusieurs formes empiriques : +Dans les usines anglaises du premier XIXe siècle, cette formalisation +prend plusieurs formes empiriques : -- les *contrats d’embauche journaliers* dans le textile ou la sidérurgie, souvent verbaux mais inscrits dans des carnets ou registres (cf. les *Mill Records* conservés dans les archives de Lancashire, 1812–1845), +- les *contrats d'embauche journaliers* dans le textile ou la + sidérurgie, souvent verbaux mais inscrits dans des carnets ou + registres (cf. les *Mill Records* conservés dans les archives de + Lancashire, 1812–1845), -- les *grilles de salaire* affichées ou transmises, fondées sur l’âge, le sexe, la productivité antérieure, +- les *grilles de salaire* affichées ou transmises, fondées sur l'âge, + le sexe, la productivité antérieure, -- les *engagements saisonniers* dans les mines, renouvelables ou révocables à l’unilatérale, souvent accompagnés de clauses d’obéissance ou de silence (cf. *Rules of the Ebbw Vale Iron Company*, 1831). +- les *engagements saisonniers* dans les mines, renouvelables ou + révocables à l'unilatérale, souvent accompagnés de clauses + d'obéissance ou de silence (cf. *Rules of the Ebbw Vale Iron Company*, + 1831). -Tous ces dispositifs ne servent pas seulement à contractualiser la présence ou le rendement ; ils instaurent une forme de normativité invisible, auto-légitimée par le fait même qu’elle se répète, qu’elle organise, qu’elle se stabilise. Le contrat salarié devient ainsi un *fait social total* au sens maussien : il structure les affects, les rythmes, les aspirations, les dépendances. Il devient *méta-régulateur*. +Tous ces dispositifs ne servent pas seulement à contractualiser la +présence ou le rendement ; ils instaurent une forme de normativité +invisible, auto-légitimée par le fait même qu'elle se répète, qu'elle +organise, qu'elle se stabilise. Le contrat salarié devient ainsi un +*fait social total* au sens maussien : il structure les affects, les +rythmes, les aspirations, les dépendances. Il devient *méta-régulateur*. -Cette première phase de l’archicration fondatrice ne saurait être confondue avec une contractualisation égalitaire du travail : elle est bien plutôt une formalisation minimale, *suffisante* pour permettre la circulation de l’effort sous forme légitime. Elle institue un *ordre productif* qui n’a plus besoin de se justifier par la coutume, la religion ou la force : il se justifie par *le contrat*, même fictif. Elle fonde, dès lors, ce que nous devons considérer comme une *synchronisation normée de l’effort* — troisième pilier de notre schéma régulatoire. +Cette première phase de l'archicration fondatrice ne saurait être +confondue avec une contractualisation égalitaire du travail : elle est +bien plutôt une formalisation minimale, *suffisante* pour permettre la +circulation de l'effort sous forme légitime. Elle institue un *ordre +productif* qui n'a plus besoin de se justifier par la coutume, la +religion ou la force : il se justifie par *le contrat*, même fictif. +Elle fonde, dès lors, ce que nous devons considérer comme une +*synchronisation normée de l'effort* — troisième pilier de notre +schéma régulatoire. -Si le contrat salarial forme l’infrastructure symbolique minimale de l’archicration fondatrice, le salaire en devient l’unité de mesure régulatoire, le vecteur de conversion, le code par lequel l’effort humain est inscrit dans un régime de valeur. Ce que cette période inaugure — de manière irréversible — n’est donc pas seulement l’échange d’un temps de travail contre une rémunération, mais la *transformation de la personne en porteur de valeur productive*, mesurable, tarifable, ajustable. En ce sens, le salaire est bien plus qu’une rétribution : il devient *codificateur anthropopolitique*. +Si le contrat salarial forme l'infrastructure symbolique minimale de +l'archicration fondatrice, le salaire en devient l'unité de mesure +régulatoire, le vecteur de conversion, le code par lequel l'effort +humain est inscrit dans un régime de valeur. Ce que cette période +inaugure — de manière irréversible — n'est donc pas seulement +l'échange d'un temps de travail contre une rémunération, mais la +*transformation de la personne en porteur de valeur productive*, +mesurable, tarifable, ajustable. En ce sens, le salaire est bien plus +qu'une rétribution : il devient *codificateur anthropopolitique*. -Dans la perspective archicratique, le salaire ne se réduit pas à une fonction économique. Il incarne trois fonctions fondamentales, conjointes et structurantes : +Dans la perspective archicratique, le salaire ne se réduit pas à une +fonction économique. Il incarne trois fonctions fondamentales, +conjointes et structurantes : -Fonction de quantification de l’effort : il établit une correspondance arithmétique entre un quantum d’effort et une somme d’argent, transformant ainsi une dépense corporelle hétérogène en unité homogène d’échange. +Fonction de quantification de l'effort : il établit une correspondance +arithmétique entre un quantum d'effort et une somme d'argent, +transformant ainsi une dépense corporelle hétérogène en unité homogène +d'échange. -Fonction de hiérarchisation sociale : il sert de base à une classification implicite des individus selon leur rendement, leur employabilité, leur discipline — bref, selon leur *valeur d’usage productive*. +Fonction de hiérarchisation sociale : il sert de base à une +classification implicite des individus selon leur rendement, leur +employabilité, leur discipline — bref, selon leur *valeur d'usage +productive*. -Fonction de reconnaissance conditionnelle : il constitue une forme minimaliste mais opérante d’inclusion dans l’ordre social industriel, par l’accès monétaire à la consommation et à la reproduction. +Fonction de reconnaissance conditionnelle : il constitue une forme +minimaliste mais opérante d'inclusion dans l'ordre social industriel, +par l'accès monétaire à la consommation et à la reproduction. -Chacune de ces fonctions fait du salaire un *vecteur de normativité*, autrement dit un opérateur de régulation indirecte mais omniprésente. +Chacune de ces fonctions fait du salaire un *vecteur de normativité*, +autrement dit un opérateur de régulation indirecte mais omniprésente. -Historiquement, cette tri-fonctionnalité s’observe de manière documentée dans les régimes salariaux des premières manufactures et filatures anglaises. Les registres de paie conservés à New Lanark (Robert Owen), Quarry Bank Mill (Samuel Greg) ou Saltaire (Titus Salt) révèlent une gradation fine des rémunérations selon l’âge, le genre, la tâche, le rendement individuel et collectif. Ainsi, en 1836, dans les usines textiles de Manchester, une fille de douze ans employée à l’ensouplineur gagnait en moyenne 2 shillings/semaine, quand un homme adulte aux métiers à tisser pouvait percevoir jusqu’à 10 shillings — une inégalité qui ne reflète pas tant une justice contractuelle qu’une *stratification implicite des corps dans l’ordre industriel*. +Historiquement, cette tri-fonctionnalité s'observe de manière documentée +dans les régimes salariaux des premières manufactures et filatures +anglaises. Les registres de paie conservés à New Lanark (Robert Owen), +Quarry Bank Mill (Samuel Greg) ou Saltaire (Titus Salt) révèlent une +gradation fine des rémunérations selon l'âge, le genre, la tâche, le +rendement individuel et collectif. Ainsi, en 1836, dans les usines +textiles de Manchester, une fille de douze ans employée à l'ensouplineur +gagnait en moyenne 2 shillings/semaine, quand un homme adulte aux +métiers à tisser pouvait percevoir jusqu'à 10 shillings — une +inégalité qui ne reflète pas tant une justice contractuelle qu'une +*stratification implicite des corps dans l'ordre industriel*. -Ce que le salaire institue, dans cette configuration, c’est *un rapport tautologique à la valeur* : est payé celui qui produit, et celui qui produit est celui qui mérite d’être payé. Cette circularité apparente, dénoncée dès le XIXe siècle par les économistes politiques critiques (notamment John Francis Bray ou Thomas Hodgskin), constitue un verrou symbolique puissant : elle naturalise la hiérarchie des rémunérations comme expression directe de la différence des efforts, dissimulant toute inégalité de position, de pouvoir, d’accès à la ressource ou au marché du travail. Le salaire devient *alibi méritocratique* d’un ordre asymétrique. +Ce que le salaire institue, dans cette configuration, c'est *un rapport +tautologique à la valeur* : est payé celui qui produit, et celui qui +produit est celui qui mérite d'être payé. Cette circularité apparente, +dénoncée dès le XIXe siècle par les économistes politiques critiques +(notamment John Francis Bray ou Thomas Hodgskin), constitue un verrou +symbolique puissant : elle naturalise la hiérarchie des rémunérations +comme expression directe de la différence des efforts, dissimulant toute +inégalité de position, de pouvoir, d'accès à la ressource ou au marché +du travail. Le salaire devient *alibi méritocratique* d'un ordre +asymétrique. -Ce n’est donc pas un hasard si les premiers combats ouvriers se concentrent précisément sur la *question salariale* : pas seulement pour obtenir davantage, mais pour *rompre avec la transparence mensongère* du rapport salaire/valeur. Les grèves de Preston (1842), les émeutes de Spitalfields (1830), les luttes des mineurs du Tyne and Wear (1831) manifestent moins une révolte contre l’exploitation brute qu’une dénonciation de la codification opaque de la vie par le salaire. L’un des tracts de la Chartist Association (1848) résume ce sentiment par une formule limpide : « Our lives are measured in coins we cannot mint » — *nos vies sont mesurées par des pièces que nous ne pouvons frapper*. +Ce n'est donc pas un hasard si les premiers combats ouvriers se +concentrent précisément sur la *question salariale* : pas seulement pour +obtenir davantage, mais pour *rompre avec la transparence mensongère* du +rapport salaire/valeur. Les grèves de Preston (1842), les émeutes de +Spitalfields (1830), les luttes des mineurs du Tyne and Wear (1831) +manifestent moins une révolte contre l'exploitation brute qu'une +dénonciation de la codification opaque de la vie par le salaire. L'un +des tracts de la Chartist Association (1848) résume ce sentiment par une +formule limpide : « Our lives are measured in coins we cannot mint » — *nos vies sont mesurées par des pièces que nous ne pouvons frapper*. -Le salaire devient ainsi l’un des premiers dispositifs biopolitiques modernes : il règle moins les seules interactions économiques que les trajectoires de vie, les régimes d’aspiration, les temporalités existentielles. Il fait du travailleur un *être-mesuré* : non par son intériorité ou son projet, mais par sa capacité à s’inscrire durablement dans une équation rendement/coût. En cela, le salaire est déjà l’ancêtre fonctionnel des futurs scores de performance, des métriques managériales, des indices RH, des plateformes de notation : il encode le vivant. +Le salaire devient ainsi l'un des premiers dispositifs biopolitiques +modernes : il règle moins les seules interactions économiques que les +trajectoires de vie, les régimes d'aspiration, les temporalités +existentielles. Il fait du travailleur un *être-mesuré* : non par son +intériorité ou son projet, mais par sa capacité à s'inscrire durablement +dans une équation rendement/coût. En cela, le salaire est déjà l'ancêtre +fonctionnel des futurs scores de performance, des métriques +managériales, des indices RH, des plateformes de notation : il encode le +vivant. -Ce que nous nommons *archicration fondatrice* s’éprouve ici dans sa pleine puissance : non pas comme légitimation externe, mais comme *stabilisation codifiante du pouvoir par la norme internalisée*. Le salarié ne se contente pas de vendre son temps : il est pris dans un dispositif de valeur qui le définit, le classe, le conditionne. Ce n’est pas seulement l’économie qui gouverne : c’est une *ontologie tarifaire* du vivant. Et cette ontologie constitue le soubassement invisible mais structurant de toute société industrielle moderne — jusqu’à aujourd’hui. +Ce que nous nommons *archicration fondatrice* s'éprouve ici dans sa +pleine puissance : non pas comme légitimation externe, mais comme +*stabilisation codifiante du pouvoir par la norme internalisée*. Le +salarié ne se contente pas de vendre son temps : il est pris dans un +dispositif de valeur qui le définit, le classe, le conditionne. Ce n'est +pas seulement l'économie qui gouverne : c'est une *ontologie tarifaire* +du vivant. Et cette ontologie constitue le soubassement invisible mais +structurant de toute société industrielle moderne — jusqu'à +aujourd'hui. -Après la spatialité contrainte de la fabrique et le codage salarial de la valeur du geste, c’est dans le temps synchronisé que se joue la clef de voûte de l’archicration fondatrice : le déploiement d’un *ordre homogène du vécu*, dans lequel tous les individus sont appelés à se mouvoir selon une même métrique, une même cadence, une même flèche temporelle. Le temps n’est plus seulement le cadre neutre de l’action, il devient un *instrument actif de régulation*, un opérateur de cohésion sociale, unificateur des rythmes, uniformisateur des subjectivités. Le temps usinier, précédemment instauré comme cadre disciplinaire, se transforme ici en *infrastructure normative généralisée*, arrimée aux logiques salariales et contractuelles. +Après la spatialité contrainte de la fabrique et le codage salarial de +la valeur du geste, c'est dans le temps synchronisé que se joue la clef +de voûte de l'archicration fondatrice : le déploiement d'un *ordre +homogène du vécu*, dans lequel tous les individus sont appelés à se +mouvoir selon une même métrique, une même cadence, une même flèche +temporelle. Le temps n'est plus seulement le cadre neutre de l'action, +il devient un *instrument actif de régulation*, un opérateur de cohésion +sociale, unificateur des rythmes, uniformisateur des subjectivités. Le +temps usinier, précédemment instauré comme cadre disciplinaire, se +transforme ici en *infrastructure normative généralisée*, arrimée aux +logiques salariales et contractuelles. -La modernité industrielle ne se contente pas d’organiser le temps de travail — elle *recompose les temporalités sociales* dans leur ensemble. En liant salaire et durée, contrat et chronométrie, effort et présence continue, le capitalisme industriel institue un régime de synchronisation massive. C’est cette synchronisation — et non la seule rationalisation — qui assure l’adhésion aux régularités imposées : on n’obéit pas tant à un chef qu’à une *cadence*, à une *heure*, à une *fréquence*. C’est le règne du *temps commutatif*, que le philosophe Jean Chesneaux qualifiait de « temps de l’horloge souveraine » (Chesneaux, *Temps et politique*, 1997), c’est-à-dire d’un temps indifférent à ce qu’il contient, mais souverain sur tout ce qu’il régit. +La modernité industrielle ne se contente pas d'organiser le temps de +travail — elle *recompose les temporalités sociales* dans leur +ensemble. En liant salaire et durée, contrat et chronométrie, effort et +présence continue, le capitalisme industriel institue un régime de +synchronisation massive. C'est cette synchronisation — et non la seule +rationalisation — qui assure l'adhésion aux régularités imposées : on +n'obéit pas tant à un chef qu'à une *cadence*, à une *heure*, à une +*fréquence*. C'est le règne du *temps commutatif*, que le philosophe +Jean Chesneaux qualifiait de « temps de l'horloge souveraine » +(Chesneaux, *Temps et politique*, 1997), c'est-à-dire d'un temps +indifférent à ce qu'il contient, mais souverain sur tout ce qu'il régit. -Cette architecture temporelle produit des effets anthropologiques décisifs. +Cette architecture temporelle produit des effets anthropologiques +décisifs. -Premièrement, elle arrime la *présence effective* à la *valeur produite*. Le temps payé devient temps utile ; le temps non payé, temps perdu. Ce couplage inaugure une *ontologie économique de la présence*, où seule la temporalité alignée sur la production a droit de cité. Ainsi, être en retard n’est pas seulement une faute pratique — c’est une transgression symbolique. Ne pas produire dans le temps requis, c’est sortir du champ de la reconnaissance. Le temps, ici, devient non seulement un instrument de mesure, mais *un critère d’existence sociale*. +Premièrement, elle arrime la *présence effective* à la *valeur +produite*. Le temps payé devient temps utile ; le temps non payé, temps +perdu. Ce couplage inaugure une *ontologie économique de la présence*, +où seule la temporalité alignée sur la production a droit de cité. +Ainsi, être en retard n'est pas seulement une faute pratique — c'est +une transgression symbolique. Ne pas produire dans le temps requis, +c'est sortir du champ de la reconnaissance. Le temps, ici, devient non +seulement un instrument de mesure, mais *un critère d'existence +sociale*. -Deuxièmement, cette synchronisation engendre un *déracinement des temporalités vécues* : les rythmes naturels, les cadences biologiques, les saisons, les alternances communautaires sont dissous dans un temps linéaire, abstrait, uniforme. Là où les sociétés préindustrielles vivaient dans une pluralité de temps — religieux, agricole, festif, initiatique —, le régime archicratique fondé sur le contrat salarial impose un *monotemps productif*. Ce que Koselleck avait désigné comme *l’accélération du temps historique* (Koselleck, *Vergangene Zukunft*, 1979) trouve ici son incarnation quotidienne dans la cadence des postes, la scansion des horaires, l’impératif de ponctualité. Il ne s’agit plus de vivre un temps, mais de *tenir une cadence*. +Deuxièmement, cette synchronisation engendre un *déracinement des +temporalités vécues* : les rythmes naturels, les cadences biologiques, +les saisons, les alternances communautaires sont dissous dans un temps +linéaire, abstrait, uniforme. Là où les sociétés préindustrielles +vivaient dans une pluralité de temps — religieux, agricole, festif, +initiatique —, le régime archicratique fondé sur le contrat salarial +impose un *monotemps productif*. Ce que Koselleck avait désigné comme +*l'accélération du temps historique* (Koselleck, *Vergangene Zukunft*, +1979) trouve ici son incarnation quotidienne dans la cadence des postes, +la scansion des horaires, l'impératif de ponctualité. Il ne s'agit plus +de vivre un temps, mais de *tenir une cadence*. -Troisièmement, et c’est là un point central de notre démonstration, cette synchronisation temporelle *produit du lien social* — non par solidarité, mais par *compatibilité fonctionnelle*. En effet, ce que permet le temps synchronisé, c’est *l’interopérabilité des efforts*, la convergence des gestes dans une logique de rendement collectif. Loin d’être une simple coordination technique, cette interopérabilité fonde un mode spécifique de coexistence : *la coexistence dans la norme temporelle*. Être ensemble, c’est être dans le même temps, non dans la même communauté. L’unité sociale ne repose plus sur l’appartenance, mais sur la simultanéité. +Troisièmement, et c'est là un point central de notre démonstration, +cette synchronisation temporelle *produit du lien social* — non par +solidarité, mais par *compatibilité fonctionnelle*. En effet, ce que +permet le temps synchronisé, c'est *l'interopérabilité des efforts*, la +convergence des gestes dans une logique de rendement collectif. Loin +d'être une simple coordination technique, cette interopérabilité fonde +un mode spécifique de coexistence : *la coexistence dans la norme +temporelle*. Être ensemble, c'est être dans le même temps, non dans la +même communauté. L'unité sociale ne repose plus sur l'appartenance, mais +sur la simultanéité. -Ainsi, le régime temporel propre à l’archicration fondatrice s’inscrit dans une logique d’unification sans subjectivation. Il produit des individus compatibles, pas des sujets solidaires. Il configure un commun sans communion. Et c’est précisément cette *normalisation par le temps* qui fonde la possibilité d’un pouvoir régulatoire *non coercitif mais permanent*, *non spectaculaire mais stable*. Le pouvoir ne commande plus : il *définit les conditions d’apparition des gestes acceptables dans le temps acceptable*. C’est la synchronisation qui devient loi. +Ainsi, le régime temporel propre à l'archicration fondatrice s'inscrit +dans une logique d'unification sans subjectivation. Il produit des +individus compatibles, pas des sujets solidaires. Il configure un commun +sans communion. Et c'est précisément cette *normalisation par le temps* +qui fonde la possibilité d'un pouvoir régulatoire *non coercitif mais +permanent*, *non spectaculaire mais stable*. Le pouvoir ne commande plus +: il *définit les conditions d'apparition des gestes acceptables dans le +temps acceptable*. C'est la synchronisation qui devient loi. -Dans ce contexte, le temps est à la fois *structure* (il organise), *valeur* (il quantifie), *contrainte* (il assigne), *preuve* (il témoigne). Il est le lieu où s’articule, à l’échelle moléculaire de l’existence, la triple régulation archicratique : arcalitaire (formes instituées du pensable), cratiale (modalités de soumission du corps), archicrative (cadre normatif de l’ordre institué). +Dans ce contexte, le temps est à la fois *structure* (il organise), +*valeur* (il quantifie), *contrainte* (il assigne), *preuve* (il +témoigne). Il est le lieu où s'articule, à l'échelle moléculaire de +l'existence, la triple régulation archicratique : arcalitaire (formes +instituées du pensable), cratiale (modalités de soumission du corps), +archicrative (cadre normatif de l'ordre institué). -C’est pourquoi la synchronisation temporelle ne saurait être considérée comme une simple externalité technique : elle est une *condition de possibilité du régime archicratique*. Le contrat salarial n’est viable qu’en régime de synchronie. La fabrique n’est opératoire qu’à l’heure dite. Le rendement n’est calculable que dans une temporalité homogène. Et la valeur n’est distribuable que sur la base d’une mesure convenue du temps passé. +C'est pourquoi la synchronisation temporelle ne saurait être considérée +comme une simple externalité technique : elle est une *condition de +possibilité du régime archicratique*. Le contrat salarial n'est viable +qu'en régime de synchronie. La fabrique n'est opératoire qu'à l'heure +dite. Le rendement n'est calculable que dans une temporalité homogène. +Et la valeur n'est distribuable que sur la base d'une mesure convenue du +temps passé. -En dernière instance, ce que la synchronisation produit, c’est un *calibrage existentiel*. Elle fonde un *ordre temporel socialisé*, dans lequel chacun est attendu, mesuré, jugé à l’aune de sa capacité à s’inscrire dans *le temps des autres* — c’est-à-dire dans *le temps de la production*. De là découle l’un des traits les plus puissants de l’archicration moderne : *la naturalisation du temps productif comme horizon ontologique universel*. +En dernière instance, ce que la synchronisation produit, c'est un +*calibrage existentiel*. Elle fonde un *ordre temporel socialisé*, dans +lequel chacun est attendu, mesuré, jugé à l'aune de sa capacité à +s'inscrire dans *le temps des autres* — c'est-à-dire dans *le temps de +la production*. De là découle l'un des traits les plus puissants de +l'archicration moderne : *la naturalisation du temps productif comme +horizon ontologique universel*. -Ainsi, la synchronisation salariale ne fait pas qu’unifier les emplois du temps. Elle *fabrique un monde dans lequel toute existence déphasée devient anomalie*. L’enfant trop lent, le vieillard trop fragile, le rêveur trop distrait, le malade trop irrégulier, sont exclus non par décret, mais par *incompatibilité rythmique*. Le temps de l’usine devient ainsi le temps de la société. Et dans cette hégémonie rythmique silencieuse, *le pouvoir n’a plus besoin de parler pour se faire obéir*. +Ainsi, la synchronisation salariale ne fait pas qu'unifier les emplois +du temps. Elle *fabrique un monde dans lequel toute existence déphasée +devient anomalie*. L'enfant trop lent, le vieillard trop fragile, le +rêveur trop distrait, le malade trop irrégulier, sont exclus non par +décret, mais par *incompatibilité rythmique*. Le temps de l'usine +devient ainsi le temps de la société. Et dans cette hégémonie rythmique +silencieuse, *le pouvoir n'a plus besoin de parler pour se faire obéir*. -Au terme de cette exploration rigoureuse, il devient manifeste que l’archicration fondatrice ne saurait être réduite à un simple encadrement juridique du travail ou à une régulation économique du rapport salarial : elle constitue, dans son essence, un *régime normatif de totalisation du monde vécu par la médiation contractuelle, salariale et temporelle*. Ce régime se fonde moins sur la transcendance d’une souveraineté politique que sur la capacité à stabiliser des normes pratiques dans l’agencement même des dispositifs industriels. l ne se proclame pas : il institue. Il ne contraint pas frontalement : il prescrit par la forme. +Au terme de cette exploration rigoureuse, il devient manifeste que +l'archicration fondatrice ne saurait être réduite à un simple +encadrement juridique du travail ou à une régulation économique du +rapport salarial : elle constitue, dans son essence, un *régime normatif +de totalisation du monde vécu par la médiation contractuelle, salariale +et temporelle*. Ce régime se fonde moins sur la transcendance d'une +souveraineté politique que sur la capacité à stabiliser des normes +pratiques dans l'agencement même des dispositifs industriels. l ne se +proclame pas : il institue. Il ne contraint pas frontalement : il +prescrit par la forme. -Le contrat de travail, dans ce cadre, ne joue pas simplement le rôle d’un accord entre deux volontés — ce qu’une lecture libérale classique pourrait laisser entendre. Il opère une formalisation normative de l’engagement asymétrique : il transforme l’effort en obligation mesurable, l’obéissance en clause, la subordination en légalité. Il constitue un dispositif d’assignation à un poste, à une tâche, à une cadence, dans lequel la relation salariale devient indiscernable du rapport de pouvoir. Le contrat n’est pas un acte librement consenti : il est l’instrument d’une inclusion contrainte dans l’ordre productif. +Le contrat de travail, dans ce cadre, ne joue pas simplement le rôle +d'un accord entre deux volontés — ce qu'une lecture libérale classique +pourrait laisser entendre. Il opère une formalisation normative de +l'engagement asymétrique : il transforme l'effort en obligation +mesurable, l'obéissance en clause, la subordination en légalité. Il +constitue un dispositif d'assignation à un poste, à une tâche, à une +cadence, dans lequel la relation salariale devient indiscernable du +rapport de pouvoir. Le contrat n'est pas un acte librement consenti : il +est l'instrument d'une inclusion contrainte dans l'ordre productif. -Le salaire, lui, ne se limite pas à un transfert monétaire contre prestation. Il joue une fonction beaucoup plus décisive : il est opérateur de codification de la valeur humaine par l’équivalence calculée. En transformant l’effort en quantum monétaire, le salaire participe d’une *ontologisation de la performance* : ce qui a de la valeur, c’est ce qui est compté. Cette numérisation de l’humain par le salaire introduit une logique d’évaluation qui déborde la simple économie : elle configure la hiérarchie sociale, structure les rythmes de vie, institue une moralité implicite fondée sur la productivité visible. Le salaire devient ainsi un étalon social de reconnaissance, mais aussi d’exclusion. +Le salaire, lui, ne se limite pas à un transfert monétaire contre +prestation. Il joue une fonction beaucoup plus décisive : il est +opérateur de codification de la valeur humaine par l'équivalence +calculée. En transformant l'effort en quantum monétaire, le salaire +participe d'une *ontologisation de la performance* : ce qui a de la +valeur, c'est ce qui est compté. Cette numérisation de l'humain par le +salaire introduit une logique d'évaluation qui déborde la simple +économie : elle configure la hiérarchie sociale, structure les rythmes +de vie, institue une moralité implicite fondée sur la productivité +visible. Le salaire devient ainsi un étalon social de reconnaissance, +mais aussi d'exclusion. -Enfin, la synchronisation temporelle impose à l’individu une unification rythmique qui n’est pas qu’organisationnelle : elle est normative, identitaire, structurante. Le temps de la fabrique — mesuré, découpé, homogénéisé — devient la matrice temporelle de la modernité industrielle. Il ne s’agit pas seulement de faire travailler à la même heure : il s’agit de faire être *dans* le même temps. Le sujet productif est dès lors un sujet synchronisé, c’est-à-dire *articulé dans une temporalité commune non choisie*, mais imposée comme évidence fonctionnelle. +Enfin, la synchronisation temporelle impose à l'individu une unification +rythmique qui n'est pas qu'organisationnelle : elle est normative, +identitaire, structurante. Le temps de la fabrique — mesuré, découpé, +homogénéisé — devient la matrice temporelle de la modernité +industrielle. Il ne s'agit pas seulement de faire travailler à la même +heure : il s'agit de faire être *dans* le même temps. Le sujet productif +est dès lors un sujet synchronisé, c'est-à-dire *articulé dans une +temporalité commune non choisie*, mais imposée comme évidence +fonctionnelle. -En croisant ces trois dispositifs, nous pouvons désormais définir l’archicration fondatrice comme *le régime régulatoire qui stabilise la domination industrielle par une codification contractuelle, une valuation salariale et une homogénéisation temporelle*. Elle fonde un ordre sans spectaculaire, un pouvoir sans effusion, une autorité sans emblème. Elle institue un monde où le travail vivant est *encadré, mesuré, valorisé*, non à travers des symboles ou des lois visibles, mais par l’agencement minutieux de dispositifs techniques et sociaux opérant à bas bruit. C’est ce que nous désignons comme *fondation régulatoire par intégration fonctionnelle*. +En croisant ces trois dispositifs, nous pouvons désormais définir +l'archicration fondatrice comme *le régime régulatoire qui stabilise la +domination industrielle par une codification contractuelle, une +valuation salariale et une homogénéisation temporelle*. Elle fonde un +ordre sans spectaculaire, un pouvoir sans effusion, une autorité sans +emblème. Elle institue un monde où le travail vivant est *encadré, +mesuré, valorisé*, non à travers des symboles ou des lois visibles, mais +par l'agencement minutieux de dispositifs techniques et sociaux opérant +à bas bruit. C'est ce que nous désignons comme *fondation régulatoire +par intégration fonctionnelle*. -Elle représente ainsi la phase culminante de l’institution archicratique de l’ère industrielle : le moment où la force n’est plus seulement extraite (cratialité), où l’espace-temps n’est plus seulement structuré (arcalité), mais où l’ensemble du système de production sociale est légitimé, naturalisé et généralisé par la coalescence de dispositifs régulateurs devenus *formes de vie*. Il ne s’agit plus de produire sous contrainte, mais de vivre dans la norme. Ce monde est clos non parce qu’il est coercitif, mais parce qu’il est *auto-référent, évident, sans extériorité pensable*. Il ne cherche pas l’adhésion ; il ne laisse aucune alternative. +Elle représente ainsi la phase culminante de l'institution archicratique +de l'ère industrielle : le moment où la force n'est plus seulement +extraite (cratialité), où l'espace-temps n'est plus seulement structuré +(arcalité), mais où l'ensemble du système de production sociale est +légitimé, naturalisé et généralisé par la coalescence de dispositifs +régulateurs devenus *formes de vie*. Il ne s'agit plus de produire sous +contrainte, mais de vivre dans la norme. Ce monde est clos non parce +qu'il est coercitif, mais parce qu'il est *auto-référent, évident, sans +extériorité pensable*. Il ne cherche pas l'adhésion ; il ne laisse +aucune alternative. -Cette stabilisation par la contractualisation, la mensualisation et la synchronisation constitue ce que nous devons reconnaître comme le socle normatif dur de l’archicration industrielle. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de coordonner des flux ou d’encadrer des gestes, mais de produire un sujet apte à l’intégration régulée. Le travailleur devient l’unité fondamentale de cette grammaire, non parce qu’il serait biologiquement déterminé à produire, mais parce qu’il est désormais *socialement défini* par sa capacité à signer, à pointer, à fournir un rendement quantifiable. +Cette stabilisation par la contractualisation, la mensualisation et la +synchronisation constitue ce que nous devons reconnaître comme le socle +normatif dur de l'archicration industrielle. Il ne s'agit plus seulement +de coordonner des flux ou d'encadrer des gestes, mais de produire un +sujet apte à l'intégration régulée. Le travailleur devient l'unité +fondamentale de cette grammaire, non parce qu'il serait biologiquement +déterminé à produire, mais parce qu'il est désormais *socialement +défini* par sa capacité à signer, à pointer, à fournir un rendement +quantifiable. -L’archicration fondatrice marque ainsi une rupture décisive dans l’histoire des régimes de pouvoir : Elle ne gouverne plus seulement les conduites : elle les configure en amont. Elle ne se borne pas à sanctionner l’écart ; elle tend à programmer l’adhésion. Elle organise ainsi l’évidence du devoir plus qu’elle ne punit frontalement. C’est là toute sa force, mais aussi toute son opacité. +L'archicration fondatrice marque ainsi une rupture décisive dans +l'histoire des régimes de pouvoir : Elle ne gouverne plus seulement les +conduites : elle les configure en amont. Elle ne se borne pas à +sanctionner l'écart ; elle tend à programmer l'adhésion. Elle organise +ainsi l'évidence du devoir plus qu'elle ne punit frontalement. C'est là +toute sa force, mais aussi toute son opacité. -Et c’est sur cette assise, désormais installée, que pourra se construire la dynamique suivante : celle de l’expansion archicratique dans la société marchande et contractuelle étendue, à partir des années 1870. Mais ceci relève d’un autre régime, et d’un autre moment de notre essai. +Et c'est sur cette assise, désormais installée, que pourra se construire +la dynamique suivante : celle de l'expansion archicratique dans la +société marchande et contractuelle étendue, à partir des années 1870. +Mais ceci relève d'un autre régime, et d'un autre moment de notre essai. -### 4.2.5 – Exemple paradigmatique : Manchester, laboratoire de la régulation mécanisée +### 4.2.5 — Exemple paradigmatique : Manchester, laboratoire de la régulation mécanisée -Manchester doit être pensée non comme une origine absolue de l’industrialisation, mais comme un laboratoire paradigmatique dans l’histoire de la régulation archicratique. Entre 1780 et 1850, elle fonctionne comme un opérateur de transformation du monde vécu, au sens fort où s’y cristallisent des formes nouvelles de visibilité, d’obéissance, de mesure et d’organisation. Elle matérialise ainsi, dans la texture même de ses usines, de ses rues et de ses horaires, l’émergence d’un régime régulatoire intensif, où s’articulent arcalité disciplinaire, cratialité extractive et archicration fondatrice. +Manchester doit être pensée non comme une origine absolue de +l'industrialisation, mais comme un laboratoire paradigmatique dans +l'histoire de la régulation archicratique. Entre 1780 et 1850, elle +fonctionne comme un opérateur de transformation du monde vécu, au sens +fort où s'y cristallisent des formes nouvelles de visibilité, +d'obéissance, de mesure et d'organisation. Elle matérialise ainsi, dans +la texture même de ses usines, de ses rues et de ses horaires, +l'émergence d'un régime régulatoire intensif, où s'articulent arcalité +disciplinaire, cratialité extractive et archicration fondatrice. -Ce qui se joue à Manchester ne représente donc pas une augmentation de la production, ni même une concentration de l’industrie textile : c’est l’instauration d’un nouveau monde régulé, où les dimensions du temps, de l’espace, du geste, de la valeur et de l’autorité sont restructurées dans une logique d’efficience machinique. Ce n’est pas un lieu ; c’est un opérateur d’ontologie sociale. +Ce qui se joue à Manchester ne représente donc pas une augmentation de +la production, ni même une concentration de l'industrie textile : c'est +l'instauration d'un nouveau monde régulé, où les dimensions du temps, de +l'espace, du geste, de la valeur et de l'autorité sont restructurées +dans une logique d'efficience machinique. Ce n'est pas un lieu ; c'est +un opérateur d'ontologie sociale. -Engels, dans *La situation de la classe laborieuse en Angleterre* (1845), consacre à Manchester une analyse saisissante, non pas tant pour dénoncer les conditions d’existence (ce qu’il fait) que pour identifier l’émergence d’un monde nouveau, dans lequel les rapports sociaux sont soumis à une rationalité d’extraction. Il y observe une transformation de l’espace urbain : « Des quartiers entiers construits selon une géométrie rigide, destinée non à l’habitation mais à la circulation de la force de travail » (éd. française, Maspero, 1969, p. 112). La ville n’est pas un milieu de vie, mais une machine de transit et de commandement : la rue conduit à l’usine, l’usine au dortoir, le dortoir à la fatigue. Ce quadrillage urbain fonctionne comme une *grille disciplinaire*, au sens foucaldien : les corps y sont localisés, assignés, rendus opératoires. +Engels, dans *La situation de la classe laborieuse en Angleterre* +(1845), consacre à Manchester une analyse saisissante, non pas tant pour +dénoncer les conditions d'existence (ce qu'il fait) que pour identifier +l'émergence d'un monde nouveau, dans lequel les rapports sociaux sont +soumis à une rationalité d'extraction. Il y observe une transformation +de l'espace urbain : « Des quartiers entiers construits selon une +géométrie rigide, destinée non à l'habitation mais à la circulation de +la force de travail » (éd. française, Maspero, 1969, p. 112). La ville +n'est pas un milieu de vie, mais une machine de transit et de +commandement : la rue conduit à l'usine, l'usine au dortoir, le dortoir +à la fatigue. Ce quadrillage urbain fonctionne comme une *grille +disciplinaire*, au sens foucaldien : les corps y sont localisés, +assignés, rendus opératoires. -Cette rationalité s’incarne avec une densité particulière dans les cotton mills — usines de filature et de tissage à vapeur — qui pullulent dans le centre et la périphérie de Manchester dès les années 1790. L’espace y est intégralement configuré pour la productivité : les bâtiments sont construits en hauteur pour maximiser la place des machines, la lumière naturelle est optimisée par de longues baies vitrées, les escaliers sont minimisés pour éviter toute perte de temps. Le plan d’architecture même est un *plan régulateur*. Chaque étage héberge une fonction précise : le cardage, le filage, le bobinage. Chaque ouvrier n’accède qu’à son niveau. Il n’y a pas de vision d’ensemble, car la totalité est réservée à la logique du capital. +Cette rationalité s'incarne avec une densité particulière dans les +cotton mills — usines de filature et de tissage à vapeur — qui +pullulent dans le centre et la périphérie de Manchester dès les années +1790. L'espace y est intégralement configuré pour la productivité : les +bâtiments sont construits en hauteur pour maximiser la place des +machines, la lumière naturelle est optimisée par de longues baies +vitrées, les escaliers sont minimisés pour éviter toute perte de temps. +Le plan d'architecture même est un *plan régulateur*. Chaque étage +héberge une fonction précise : le cardage, le filage, le bobinage. +Chaque ouvrier n'accède qu'à son niveau. Il n'y a pas de vision +d'ensemble, car la totalité est réservée à la logique du capital. -Le temps y est tout aussi rigoureusement segmenté. Dès 1802, les règlements de filatures — comme ceux observés à la Strangeways Mill ou à la New Union Mill — prescrivent une journée de travail de 14 à 16 heures, entrecoupée de pauses minutées, sous le contrôle du contremaître. La cloche d’appel, installée en hauteur, marque le début et la fin des séquences, et précède les premiers chronomètres industriels à usage managérial, importés d’Allemagne ou de Suisse. L’heure, ici, n’est pas une convention : c’est un impératif normatif. Le corps doit coïncider avec la cadence. +Le temps y est tout aussi rigoureusement segmenté. Dès 1802, les +règlements de filatures — comme ceux observés à la Strangeways Mill ou +à la New Union Mill — prescrivent une journée de travail de 14 à 16 +heures, entrecoupée de pauses minutées, sous le contrôle du +contremaître. La cloche d'appel, installée en hauteur, marque le début +et la fin des séquences, et précède les premiers chronomètres +industriels à usage managérial, importés d'Allemagne ou de Suisse. +L'heure, ici, n'est pas une convention : c'est un impératif normatif. Le +corps doit coïncider avec la cadence. La segmentation spatio-temporelle à Manchester est donc double : -*spatiale*, car l’usine isole, ordonne, et contraint les mouvements en fonction de leur rentabilité ; +*spatiale*, car l'usine isole, ordonne, et contraint les mouvements en +fonction de leur rentabilité ; -*temporelle*, car le déroulement de la journée est converti en unités de rendement, mesurées, tracées, comparées. +*temporelle*, car le déroulement de la journée est converti en unités de +rendement, mesurées, tracées, comparées. -Nous pouvons ici reprendre la formule de Gilles Deleuze dans *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990) : « L’usine est une école de temps. » Sauf que Manchester ne fait pas qu’éduquer — elle installe la synchronisation comme principe organisateur du social. C’est la société elle-même, non plus seulement l’entreprise, qui devient segmentée en tranches de productivité. +Nous pouvons ici reprendre la formule de Gilles Deleuze dans +*Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990) : « L'usine est une +école de temps. » Sauf que Manchester ne fait pas qu'éduquer — elle +installe la synchronisation comme principe organisateur du social. C'est +la société elle-même, non plus seulement l'entreprise, qui devient +segmentée en tranches de productivité. -Mais ce qui fait de Manchester un exemple paradigmatique, ce n’est pas seulement cette intensité spatio-temporelle, c’est le caractère totalisant de sa régulation. La ville devient un dispositif en soi (*dispositif*, au sens foucaldien : un agencement de savoirs, de normes, de techniques, de lieux, de fonctions, de corps). Le logement ouvrier est pensé pour réduire les déplacements. Les tavernes sont situées près des dortoirs pour éviter la dispersion. Les cadastres sont dessinés selon les flux de circulation du textile. Tout est organisé pour la canalisation de l’effort — jusque dans la disposition des trottoirs et la pente des ruelles. +Mais ce qui fait de Manchester un exemple paradigmatique, ce n'est pas +seulement cette intensité spatio-temporelle, c'est le caractère +totalisant de sa régulation. La ville devient un dispositif en soi +(*dispositif*, au sens foucaldien : un agencement de savoirs, de normes, +de techniques, de lieux, de fonctions, de corps). Le logement ouvrier +est pensé pour réduire les déplacements. Les tavernes sont situées près +des dortoirs pour éviter la dispersion. Les cadastres sont dessinés +selon les flux de circulation du textile. Tout est organisé pour la +canalisation de l'effort — jusque dans la disposition des trottoirs et +la pente des ruelles. -Manchester est ainsi une forme urbaine régulatrice, un prototype de cité machinique dans laquelle le pouvoir ne se dit plus, mais s’incorpore. Il passe dans les briques, dans les cadrans, dans les plannings, dans la poussière de coton qui s’infiltre dans les poumons. La ville n’est pas un décor de l’industrialisation : elle est son vecteur normatif. Elle opère la fusion des trois régimes — arcalitaire, cratial, archicratique — dans une configuration intégrale. Elle est archicration matérialisée, *in situ*. +Manchester est ainsi une forme urbaine régulatrice, un prototype de cité +machinique dans laquelle le pouvoir ne se dit plus, mais s'incorpore. Il +passe dans les briques, dans les cadrans, dans les plannings, dans la +poussière de coton qui s'infiltre dans les poumons. La ville n'est pas +un décor de l'industrialisation : elle est son vecteur normatif. Elle +opère la fusion des trois régimes — arcalitaire, cratial, +archicratique — dans une configuration intégrale. Elle est +archicration matérialisée, *in situ*. -Si Manchester cristallise une forme urbaine de la régulation, elle en opère aussi la concrétisation matérielle au niveau micro-structural. Ce sont en effet les dispositifs élémentaires, disséminés dans les usines et leurs annexes, qui assurent l’efficacité réelle du régime archicratique naissant. Ces dispositifs ne sont ni symboliques ni théoriques : ils sont techniques, opératoires, et souvent d’une banalité telle qu’ils passent inaperçus — ce qui, précisément, leur confère leur puissance normative. L’archicration se niche dans la banalité instrumentale. +Si Manchester cristallise une forme urbaine de la régulation, elle en +opère aussi la concrétisation matérielle au niveau micro-structural. Ce +sont en effet les dispositifs élémentaires, disséminés dans les usines +et leurs annexes, qui assurent l'efficacité réelle du régime +archicratique naissant. Ces dispositifs ne sont ni symboliques ni +théoriques : ils sont techniques, opératoires, et souvent d'une banalité +telle qu'ils passent inaperçus — ce qui, précisément, leur confère +leur puissance normative. L'archicration se niche dans la banalité +instrumentale. -Le premier de ces instruments est le carnet d’heures, ou *time-book*, qui devient à Manchester une institution régulatrice avant même d’être un outil comptable. Chaque ouvrier, chaque ouvrière, est enregistré quotidiennement à l’entrée de l’usine. Le carnet note l’heure exacte d’arrivée, les absences, les retards, les pauses, les infractions. Ce registre, tenu par le contremaître ou son assistant, ne sert pas seulement à déterminer la paie : il constitue une archive comportementale. On y consigne le geste défaillant, l’attitude jugée improductive, la récurrence d’un écart. Il s’agit là d’un embryon de surveillance rationalisée, un panoptisme sans prison, où l’individu est défini par sa régularité d’insertion dans la chaîne. +Le premier de ces instruments est le carnet d'heures, ou *time-book*, +qui devient à Manchester une institution régulatrice avant même d'être +un outil comptable. Chaque ouvrier, chaque ouvrière, est enregistré +quotidiennement à l'entrée de l'usine. Le carnet note l'heure exacte +d'arrivée, les absences, les retards, les pauses, les infractions. Ce +registre, tenu par le contremaître ou son assistant, ne sert pas +seulement à déterminer la paie : il constitue une archive +comportementale. On y consigne le geste défaillant, l'attitude jugée +improductive, la récurrence d'un écart. Il s'agit là d'un embryon de +surveillance rationalisée, un panoptisme sans prison, où l'individu est +défini par sa régularité d'insertion dans la chaîne. -Ce carnet préfigure, par sa logique de codification de la présence, les futures techniques de gestion par indicateurs que l’on retrouvera dans les régimes cybernétiques ultérieurs (cf. §4.4). Mais ici, la régulation n’est pas encore algorithmisée : elle repose sur l’objectivation du temps comme valeur. Chaque minute devient une entité marchande. C’est la généralisation du *minute-wage*, du salaire à l’unité temporelle, qui impose à chaque geste une valeur monétarisée — ce que Ricardo et Senior théorisent alors en économie politique comme « temps productif net ». +Ce carnet préfigure, par sa logique de codification de la présence, les +futures techniques de gestion par indicateurs que l'on retrouvera dans +les régimes cybernétiques ultérieurs (cf. §4.4). Mais ici, la régulation +n'est pas encore algorithmisée : elle repose sur l'objectivation du +temps comme valeur. Chaque minute devient une entité marchande. C'est la +généralisation du *minute-wage*, du salaire à l'unité temporelle, qui +impose à chaque geste une valeur monétarisée — ce que Ricardo et +Senior théorisent alors en économie politique comme « temps productif +net ». -La deuxième catégorie de dispositifs tient à l’organisation coercitive du temps par la chronométrie industrielle. Bien avant Taylor et ses chronométreurs de la fin du XIXe siècle, les industriels manchesteriens de la période 1800–1840 expérimentent déjà des instruments de mesure fine du temps de travail. Le recours aux montres collectives, aux sirènes synchronisées, aux horloges murales dans chaque salle de l’usine constitue un changement anthropotechnique majeur. Le temps n’est plus un cadre extérieur à l’action humaine ; il devient une norme d’ajustement comportemental, imposée du dehors, intériorisée du dedans. +La deuxième catégorie de dispositifs tient à l'organisation coercitive +du temps par la chronométrie industrielle. Bien avant Taylor et ses +chronométreurs de la fin du XIXe siècle, les industriels manchesteriens +de la période 1800–1840 expérimentent déjà des instruments de mesure +fine du temps de travail. Le recours aux montres collectives, aux +sirènes synchronisées, aux horloges murales dans chaque salle de l'usine +constitue un changement anthropotechnique majeur. Le temps n'est plus un +cadre extérieur à l'action humaine ; il devient une norme d'ajustement +comportemental, imposée du dehors, intériorisée du dedans. -Dans son rapport parlementaire sur les conditions de travail dans les usines de Manchester (1833), le médecin inspecteur James Kay Shuttleworth note ainsi que « l’ouvrier apprend à sentir les heures non comme une suite naturelle mais comme une exigence extérieure, imposée par la cloche et la vapeur » (*The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester*, 1832). Cette “exigence extérieure” devient la loi de l’action. Le rythme humain est subordonné au rythme mécanique. Ce phénomène est au cœur de la *temporalisation archicratique* : non plus un temps vécu, partagé, symbolisé, mais un temps mesuré, assigné, contraint, qui structure les subjectivités et rééduque les corps. +Dans son rapport parlementaire sur les conditions de travail dans les +usines de Manchester (1833), le médecin inspecteur James Kay +Shuttleworth note ainsi que « l'ouvrier apprend à sentir les heures non +comme une suite naturelle mais comme une exigence extérieure, imposée +par la cloche et la vapeur » (*The Moral and Physical Condition of the +Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester*, +1832). Cette "exigence extérieure" devient la loi de l'action. Le rythme +humain est subordonné au rythme mécanique. Ce phénomène est au cœur de +la *temporalisation archicratique* : non plus un temps vécu, partagé, +symbolisé, mais un temps mesuré, assigné, contraint, qui structure les +subjectivités et rééduque les corps. -Troisième vecteur décisif : la coercition productive, ou le régime disciplinaire fondé sur la punition, la menace, l’amende et l’exclusion. Le système manchesterien repose en effet sur une économie du contrôle, dans laquelle chaque comportement jugé déviant est monétairement réprimé. Le règlement de la Union Mill (1836) impose des retenues de 1/8e de journée pour chaque minute de retard ; celui de la Tyldesley Spinning Factory (1840) prévoit l’amende pour “ralentissement visible du geste”. Cette transformation du droit disciplinaire en comptabilité du défaut constitue une opération régulatoire majeure : le manquement devient chiffrable, donc intégrable, donc standardisable. +Troisième vecteur décisif : la coercition productive, ou le régime +disciplinaire fondé sur la punition, la menace, l'amende et l'exclusion. +Le système manchesterien repose en effet sur une économie du contrôle, +dans laquelle chaque comportement jugé déviant est monétairement +réprimé. Le règlement de la Union Mill (1836) impose des retenues de +1/8e de journée pour chaque minute de retard ; celui de la Tyldesley +Spinning Factory (1840) prévoit l'amende pour "ralentissement visible du +geste". Cette transformation du droit disciplinaire en comptabilité du +défaut constitue une opération régulatoire majeure : le manquement +devient chiffrable, donc intégrable, donc standardisable. -La coercition s’exerce également par l’instabilité volontaire des embauches. Comme l’a bien analysé l’historien E.P. Thompson dans *The Making of the English Working Class* (1963), « le marché de l’emploi manchesterien est organisé de façon à maintenir l’ouvrier dans un état permanent de vulnérabilité ». Les périodes de “hiring” et de “firing” sont courtes, arbitraires, dépendantes des commandes. L’instabilité devient une tactique managériale. Le salaire est journalier, les conditions négociables à tout moment, les postes interchangeables. Cette précarité structurelle engendre une forme d’obéissance intéressée, une intégration par la peur de l’abandon, et une autorégulation silencieuse des comportements. +La coercition s'exerce également par l'instabilité volontaire des +embauches. Comme l'a bien analysé l'historien E.P. Thompson dans *The +Making of the English Working Class* (1963), « le marché de l'emploi +manchesterien est organisé de façon à maintenir l'ouvrier dans un état +permanent de vulnérabilité ». Les périodes de "hiring" et de "firing" +sont courtes, arbitraires, dépendantes des commandes. L'instabilité +devient une tactique managériale. Le salaire est journalier, les +conditions négociables à tout moment, les postes interchangeables. Cette +précarité structurelle engendre une forme d'obéissance intéressée, une +intégration par la peur de l'abandon, et une autorégulation silencieuse +des comportements. -Enfin, il faut souligner le rôle central de la machine elle-même comme vecteur normatif. La “mule-jenny”, la “spinning-frame”, la “power loom” ne sont pas de simples prolongements du bras ou du pied : elles constituent une scène de contrainte, au sein de laquelle l’humain est indexé à une cadence extérieure. Le rythme de la vapeur, la fréquence de la bobine, la vitesse de la navette deviennent des unités régulatoires. L’ouvrier est là pour suivre, pour ne pas ralentir, pour demeurer dans le sillage de la machine. Il est ajusté, comme un engrenage vivant. L’interruption devient faute ; la fatigue, un écart. L’effort est requis non pour produire, mais pour ne pas dérailler. +Enfin, il faut souligner le rôle central de la machine elle-même comme +vecteur normatif. La "mule-jenny", la "spinning-frame", la "power loom" +ne sont pas de simples prolongements du bras ou du pied : elles +constituent une scène de contrainte, au sein de laquelle l'humain est +indexé à une cadence extérieure. Le rythme de la vapeur, la fréquence de +la bobine, la vitesse de la navette deviennent des unités régulatoires. +L'ouvrier est là pour suivre, pour ne pas ralentir, pour demeurer dans +le sillage de la machine. Il est ajusté, comme un engrenage vivant. +L'interruption devient faute ; la fatigue, un écart. L'effort est requis +non pour produire, mais pour ne pas dérailler. -Ce quadrillage matériel de la fabrique manchesterienne — fichage, chronométrie, sanctions, machine-norme — constitue un régime régulateur complet, dans lequel l’archicration opère sans décret, sans État, sans Constitution. Elle est appliquée, incarnée, performée. Elle agit à travers une série de micro-mécanismes qui, ensemble, installent une scène où le pouvoir est sans visage mais à rendement maximal. +Ce quadrillage matériel de la fabrique manchesterienne — fichage, +chronométrie, sanctions, machine-norme — constitue un régime +régulateur complet, dans lequel l'archicration opère sans décret, sans +État, sans Constitution. Elle est appliquée, incarnée, performée. Elle +agit à travers une série de micro-mécanismes qui, ensemble, installent +une scène où le pouvoir est sans visage mais à rendement maximal. -L'efficacité du régime archicratique naissant à Manchester ne se comprend pleinement que si l’on examine aussi ses zones de fissuration, ses résistances internes, ses lignes de fuite. Car toute régulation produit ses excès, ses excédés, ses contre-forces. En cela, Manchester n’est pas seulement un laboratoire de la régulation mécanisée ; elle est aussi le lieu de ses premières contestations explicites, de ses contre-scènes prolétariennes, de ses proto-formes de régulation antagoniste. L’archicration ne s’y impose jamais sans friction : elle est toujours négociée dans l’épreuve. +L'efficacité du régime archicratique naissant à Manchester ne se +comprend pleinement que si l'on examine aussi ses zones de fissuration, +ses résistances internes, ses lignes de fuite. Car toute régulation +produit ses excès, ses excédés, ses contre-forces. En cela, Manchester +n'est pas seulement un laboratoire de la régulation mécanisée ; elle est +aussi le lieu de ses premières contestations explicites, de ses +contre-scènes prolétariennes, de ses proto-formes de régulation +antagoniste. L'archicration ne s'y impose jamais sans friction : elle +est toujours négociée dans l'épreuve. -Dès les premières décennies du XIXe siècle, les archives anglaises témoignent d’un phénomène récurrent : la révolte des rythmes imposés. Les procès-verbaux de la Manchester Magistrates' Court entre 1811 et 1831 regorgent d’incidents liés à des refus de cadence, à des sabotages discrets, à des arrêts spontanés de travail. Un ouvrier de la Chorlton Mill, interrogé en 1826, explique : « La machine allait trop vite pour mes bras. J’ai tiré la manette. Ils m’ont mis à la porte. » Cette phrase, anodine en apparence, condense toute une dialectique régulatoire : un geste d’auto-défense face à une norme incorporée devenue insoutenable. +Dès les premières décennies du XIXe siècle, les archives anglaises +témoignent d'un phénomène récurrent : la révolte des rythmes imposés. +Les procès-verbaux de la Manchester Magistrates' Court entre 1811 et +1831 regorgent d'incidents liés à des refus de cadence, à des sabotages +discrets, à des arrêts spontanés de travail. Un ouvrier de la Chorlton +Mill, interrogé en 1826, explique : « La machine allait trop vite pour +mes bras. J'ai tiré la manette. Ils m'ont mis à la porte. » Cette +phrase, anodine en apparence, condense toute une dialectique régulatoire +: un geste d'auto-défense face à une norme incorporée devenue +insoutenable. -Les formes de résistance se structurent alors selon plusieurs modalités. La première, la plus spectaculaire, est la révolte ouvrière ouverte — émeutes, bris de machines, attroupements illégaux. Manchester est une des plaques tournantes du mouvement luddite (1811–1816), dont les attaques contre les métiers mécaniques symbolisent une tentative de reconquête du geste humain face à la désincarnation productive. Loin d’être une pure réaction passéiste, comme l’historiographie libérale l’a parfois caricaturée, la révolte luddite peut être lue comme un refus de l’abstraction régulatoire, un sursaut contre la réduction du travail à son unité mesurable. +Les formes de résistance se structurent alors selon plusieurs modalités. +La première, la plus spectaculaire, est la révolte ouvrière ouverte — émeutes, bris de machines, attroupements illégaux. Manchester est une +des plaques tournantes du mouvement luddite (1811–1816), dont les +attaques contre les métiers mécaniques symbolisent une tentative de +reconquête du geste humain face à la désincarnation productive. Loin +d'être une pure réaction passéiste, comme l'historiographie libérale l'a +parfois caricaturée, la révolte luddite peut être lue comme un refus de +l'abstraction régulatoire, un sursaut contre la réduction du travail à +son unité mesurable. -Plus tard, dans les années 1830–1840, cette protestation change de forme : elle devient politique et institutionnelle, avec l’essor du mouvement chartiste. Né en grande partie dans les faubourgs industriels du Nord de l’Angleterre, le chartisme exprime non seulement une demande de droits (suffrage universel masculin, rémunération des députés, vote secret), mais surtout une critique de la dépossession régulatoire. Le « peuple » y est défini comme non seulement exclu du politique, mais encadré dans le social sans contre-pouvoir. Dans les pétitions de 1839, on lit : « Nous travaillons jusqu’à la ruine. On nous prend notre vie au nom du progrès. » +Plus tard, dans les années 1830–1840, cette protestation change de +forme : elle devient politique et institutionnelle, avec l'essor du +mouvement chartiste. Né en grande partie dans les faubourgs industriels +du Nord de l'Angleterre, le chartisme exprime non seulement une demande +de droits (suffrage universel masculin, rémunération des députés, vote +secret), mais surtout une critique de la dépossession régulatoire. Le « +peuple » y est défini comme non seulement exclu du politique, mais +encadré dans le social sans contre-pouvoir. Dans les pétitions de 1839, +on lit : « Nous travaillons jusqu'à la ruine. On nous prend notre vie au +nom du progrès. » -Ce sont ces luttes, réprimées dans le sang à Peterloo (1819) et contenues à coups d’arrestations massives, qui forgent ce que l’on peut appeler une proto-conscience régulatoire antagoniste. Elle n’est pas encore structurée en syndicats puissants ni en partis de masse, mais elle exprime déjà une reconnaissance intuitive du fait que le pouvoir a changé de scène. Ce n’est plus le trône ou le Parlement qui organise la vie quotidienne, mais l’usine, le carnet d’heures, la sirène. Et contre cette hégémonie du temps contraint, émergent des pratiques de réappropriation : cercles ouvriers, clubs politiques, mutuelles de soutien, journaux artisanaux, braconnages de gestes. +Ce sont ces luttes, réprimées dans le sang à Peterloo (1819) et +contenues à coups d'arrestations massives, qui forgent ce que l'on peut +appeler une proto-conscience régulatoire antagoniste. Elle n'est pas +encore structurée en syndicats puissants ni en partis de masse, mais +elle exprime déjà une reconnaissance intuitive du fait que le pouvoir a +changé de scène. Ce n'est plus le trône ou le Parlement qui organise la +vie quotidienne, mais l'usine, le carnet d'heures, la sirène. Et contre +cette hégémonie du temps contraint, émergent des pratiques de +réappropriation : cercles ouvriers, clubs politiques, mutuelles de +soutien, journaux artisanaux, braconnages de gestes. -L’analyse de ces mouvements révèle une chose essentielle : l’archicration disciplinante produit ses limites internes. Elle est puissante, mais fragile. Elle est opérationnelle, mais contestée. Elle régule, mais sans fondement symbolique reconnu — ce qui en fait un régime efficace, mais instable. Le pouvoir manchestérien réside dans une effectivité sans légitimité, dans une performance sans consentement et dans une domination dépourvue de scène explicite de souveraineté. +L'analyse de ces mouvements révèle une chose essentielle : +l'archicration disciplinante produit ses limites internes. Elle est +puissante, mais fragile. Elle est opérationnelle, mais contestée. Elle +régule, mais sans fondement symbolique reconnu — ce qui en fait un +régime efficace, mais instable. Le pouvoir manchestérien réside dans une +effectivité sans légitimité, dans une performance sans consentement et +dans une domination dépourvue de scène explicite de souveraineté. -En cela, Manchester doit être pensé non seulement comme le point d’origine d’une nouvelle régulation productive, mais aussi comme le lieu généalogique d’une double tension : entre maîtrise technique et effondrement symbolique ; entre efficacité disciplinaire et conflictualité diffuse. C’est dans cet écart que naîtra, plus tard, l’institutionnalisation des conflits, la négociation collective, les premières formes d’archicration négociée que l’on retrouvera à l’âge fordiste (cf. §4.3). +En cela, Manchester doit être pensé non seulement comme le point +d'origine d'une nouvelle régulation productive, mais aussi comme le lieu +généalogique d'une double tension : entre maîtrise technique et +effondrement symbolique ; entre efficacité disciplinaire et +conflictualité diffuse. C'est dans cet écart que naîtra, plus tard, +l'institutionnalisation des conflits, la négociation collective, les +premières formes d'archicration négociée que l'on retrouvera à l'âge +fordiste (cf. §4.3). -L’efficacité opératoire de la cratialité extractive et de l’archicration fondatrice, telles qu’elles s’élaborent dans l’espace industriel manchesterien, ne doit pas masquer leur instabilité structurelle. Si Manchester incarne une première scène pleinement fonctionnelle de régulation mécanisée, elle en montre aussi les failles : tensions internes, révoltes, désajustements sociaux, fragilité normative. Autrement dit, l’archicration naissante régule, certes — mais elle régule mal, au prix d’un déséquilibre chronique entre efficacité productive et chaos social latent. Ce déséquilibre structurel est la marque d’une régulation encore en phase expérimentale, non stabilisée, vulnérable à ses propres excès. +L'efficacité opératoire de la cratialité extractive et de l'archicration +fondatrice, telles qu'elles s'élaborent dans l'espace industriel +manchesterien, ne doit pas masquer leur instabilité structurelle. Si +Manchester incarne une première scène pleinement fonctionnelle de +régulation mécanisée, elle en montre aussi les failles : tensions +internes, révoltes, désajustements sociaux, fragilité normative. +Autrement dit, l'archicration naissante régule, certes — mais elle +régule mal, au prix d'un déséquilibre chronique entre efficacité +productive et chaos social latent. Ce déséquilibre structurel est la +marque d'une régulation encore en phase expérimentale, non stabilisée, +vulnérable à ses propres excès. -L’un des premiers symptômes de cette instabilité est l’irruption régulière de crises sociales massives. L’histoire industrielle du premier XIXe siècle anglais est scandée par une série de chocs violents : émeutes de prix, révoltes ouvrières, sabotages de machines, affrontements avec les forces de l’ordre. Les révoltes luddistes de 1811–1816, les grandes grèves du Lancashire (1818, 1824, 1831), la répression de Peterloo (1819), ou encore les émeutes anti-Poor Laws de 1837, en constituent les points saillants. Chacune de ces séquences indique une chose claire : le pouvoir régulatoire nouvellement instauré ne suffit pas à produire un ordre stable. +L'un des premiers symptômes de cette instabilité est l'irruption +régulière de crises sociales massives. L'histoire industrielle du +premier XIXe siècle anglais est scandée par une série de chocs violents +: émeutes de prix, révoltes ouvrières, sabotages de machines, +affrontements avec les forces de l'ordre. Les révoltes luddistes de +1811–1816, les grandes grèves du Lancashire (1818, 1824, 1831), la +répression de Peterloo (1819), ou encore les émeutes anti-Poor Laws de +1837, en constituent les points saillants. Chacune de ces séquences +indique une chose claire : le pouvoir régulatoire nouvellement instauré +ne suffit pas à produire un ordre stable. -L’instabilité ne tient pas à une absence de contrôle ; elle procède de l’incapacité à produire un ordre incorporé. L’effort est requis, la discipline imposée, les gestes calibrés — mais sans institution symbolique forte pour en garantir le sens. Les ouvriers sont soumis, mais non intégrés. Le travail est contraint, mais non reconnu. Il n’y a pas de pacte social ; il n’y a que des dispositifs. Ce divorce entre régulation technique et légitimation politique engendre une situation de crise permanente, où l’ordre ne se maintient que sous menace. +L'instabilité ne tient pas à une absence de contrôle ; elle procède de +l'incapacité à produire un ordre incorporé. L'effort est requis, la +discipline imposée, les gestes calibrés — mais sans institution +symbolique forte pour en garantir le sens. Les ouvriers sont soumis, +mais non intégrés. Le travail est contraint, mais non reconnu. Il n'y a +pas de pacte social ; il n'y a que des dispositifs. Ce divorce entre +régulation technique et légitimation politique engendre une situation de +crise permanente, où l'ordre ne se maintient que sous menace. -Autre limite : l’ancrage exclusivement local de la régulation industrielle. Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Sheffield fonctionnent comme *micro-régimes régulatoires autonomes*, pilotés par des patrons, des contremaîtres, des notables. L’État central, pour sa part, demeure en retrait : il délègue l’encadrement social aux propriétaires, tout en conservant le monopole de la répression ponctuelle. Cette absence d’unification nationale de la régulation engendre des disparités extrêmes, des incohérences d’application, des conflits de normes. Le Factory Act de 1833, par exemple, interdit le travail des enfants de moins de 9 ans — mais son application est si lacunaire que des inspections de 1836 révèlent des enfants de six ans travaillant encore 60 heures par semaine dans le Yorkshire. +Autre limite : l'ancrage exclusivement local de la régulation +industrielle. Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Sheffield fonctionnent +comme *micro-régimes régulatoires autonomes*, pilotés par des patrons, +des contremaîtres, des notables. L'État central, pour sa part, demeure +en retrait : il délègue l'encadrement social aux propriétaires, tout en +conservant le monopole de la répression ponctuelle. Cette absence +d'unification nationale de la régulation engendre des disparités +extrêmes, des incohérences d'application, des conflits de normes. Le +Factory Act de 1833, par exemple, interdit le travail des enfants de +moins de 9 ans — mais son application est si lacunaire que des +inspections de 1836 révèlent des enfants de six ans travaillant encore +60 heures par semaine dans le Yorkshire. -Cette régulation morcelée est le signe d’une *archicration encore fragile* : sans système juridique homogène, sans normalisation d’État, sans prise sur l’infrastructure symbolique. Elle régule sans surplomb, commande sans transcendance et structure sans mémoire collective ni horizon commun. +Cette régulation morcelée est le signe d'une *archicration encore +fragile* : sans système juridique homogène, sans normalisation d'État, +sans prise sur l'infrastructure symbolique. Elle régule sans surplomb, +commande sans transcendance et structure sans mémoire collective ni +horizon commun. -Un troisième point de friction réside dans l’antagonisme entre productivité et viabilité sociale. Le modèle manchesterien est redoutablement efficace pour produire — mais cette production s’accompagne d’une destruction systémique des corps, des solidarités, des territoires. Les rapports sanitaires de 1832 sur les quartiers industriels de Manchester, commandés par Edwin Chadwick, sont accablants : taux de mortalité infantile explosifs, épidémies récurrentes, promiscuité extrême. La régulation archicratique naissante produit une abondance de marchandises… mais aussi un appauvrissement général des conditions d’existence. +Un troisième point de friction réside dans l'antagonisme entre +productivité et viabilité sociale. Le modèle manchesterien est +redoutablement efficace pour produire — mais cette production +s'accompagne d'une destruction systémique des corps, des solidarités, +des territoires. Les rapports sanitaires de 1832 sur les quartiers +industriels de Manchester, commandés par Edwin Chadwick, sont accablants +: taux de mortalité infantile explosifs, épidémies récurrentes, +promiscuité extrême. La régulation archicratique naissante produit une +abondance de marchandises... mais aussi un appauvrissement général des +conditions d'existence. -Ce paradoxe alimente une critique radicale du capitalisme industriel, que l’on retrouve aussi bien chez Engels que chez Carlyle, Ruskin ou même Tocqueville. Cette critique n’est pas encore unifiée en programme politique, mais elle pointe déjà la contradiction centrale du modèle : *réguler l’effort sans réguler le vivre*. Autrement dit, organiser les gestes sans organiser le sens, maximiser les outputs sans garantir les conditions de reproduction sociale. D’où l’émergence d’un malaise régulatoire profond : la scène productive est efficace mais inhospitalière, normative mais désaffiliée. +Ce paradoxe alimente une critique radicale du capitalisme industriel, +que l'on retrouve aussi bien chez Engels que chez Carlyle, Ruskin ou +même Tocqueville. Cette critique n'est pas encore unifiée en programme +politique, mais elle pointe déjà la contradiction centrale du modèle : +*réguler l'effort sans réguler le vivre*. Autrement dit, organiser les +gestes sans organiser le sens, maximiser les outputs sans garantir les +conditions de reproduction sociale. D'où l'émergence d'un malaise +régulatoire profond : la scène productive est efficace mais +inhospitalière, normative mais désaffiliée. -Face à ce désordre latent, l’État britannique oscille. Dans un premier temps, il s’érige en *garant de l’ordre privé* : il protège la propriété, réprime les grèves, interdit les associations de travailleurs (cf. Combination Acts de 1799–1800). Puis, devant l’ampleur des crises, il amorce un basculement. Les premiers *Factory Acts* (1833, 1844, 1847), les commissions d’hygiène publique, les enquêtes parlementaires sur la condition ouvrière marquent un tournant : celui d’une tentative d’intégration minimale des exigences sociales dans le dispositif productif. Mais cette intervention reste timide, partielle, incertaine. L’État n’impose pas encore la régulation ; il colmate. +Face à ce désordre latent, l'État britannique oscille. Dans un premier +temps, il s'érige en *garant de l'ordre privé* : il protège la +propriété, réprime les grèves, interdit les associations de travailleurs +(cf. Combination Acts de 1799–1800). Puis, devant l'ampleur des crises, +il amorce un basculement. Les premiers *Factory Acts* (1833, 1844, +1847), les commissions d'hygiène publique, les enquêtes parlementaires +sur la condition ouvrière marquent un tournant : celui d'une tentative +d'intégration minimale des exigences sociales dans le dispositif +productif. Mais cette intervention reste timide, partielle, incertaine. +L'État n'impose pas encore la régulation ; il colmate. -Ce positionnement ambigu signe l’instabilité de la régulation archicratique naissante. Il n’y a pas encore d’articulation cohérente entre puissance publique, logique productive et reconnaissance sociale. La scène régulatoire est encore en formation. Elle régule sans État, gouverne sans gouvernance, impose sans légitimité : c’est une proto-archicration. +Ce positionnement ambigu signe l'instabilité de la régulation +archicratique naissante. Il n'y a pas encore d'articulation cohérente +entre puissance publique, logique productive et reconnaissance sociale. +La scène régulatoire est encore en formation. Elle régule sans État, +gouverne sans gouvernance, impose sans légitimité : c'est une +proto-archicration. -Nous pouvons donc conclure cette section par une formule simple : la première régulation industrielle institue une puissance opératoire avant d’instituer pleinement sa propre légitimation. Elle met en place une machinerie de contrôle, mais sans scène suffisamment robuste de reprise, de justification et de pacification. C’est en ce sens qu’elle relève d’une proto-archicration : non un régime accompli, mais une forme encore partielle, instable et conflictuelle de régulation. +Nous pouvons donc conclure cette section par une formule simple : la +première régulation industrielle institue une puissance opératoire avant +d'instituer pleinement sa propre légitimation. Elle met en place une +machinerie de contrôle, mais sans scène suffisamment robuste de reprise, +de justification et de pacification. C'est en ce sens qu'elle relève +d'une proto-archicration : non un régime accompli, mais une forme encore +partielle, instable et conflictuelle de régulation. ## **4.3 — Deuxième révolution industrielle (1870–1945) : régulation état-centrée, fordisme régulateur et dérive totalitaire** -Ce qui s’ouvre avec la seconde révolution industrielle n’est pas une simple continuité technologique ni une extension capitalistique : c’est une recomposition fondamentale du système régulatoire et du rôle de l’État moderne. Dans les sociétés industrielles avancées, de l’Europe occidentale aux États-Unis en passant par la Russie devenue soviétique, s’opère alors un basculement de paradigme dans la manière d’organiser, d’encadrer et de redistribuer les puissances d’agir humaines. Si la première révolution industrielle avait déjà inauguré une forme de régulation mécanisée, localisée, informelle, souvent instable, structurée par la fabrique, la seconde opère une montée en généralité et en abstraction, en un mot, une étatisation de la régulation. Elle n’étend pas seulement les dispositifs de contrôle ; elle en redéfinit la scène ontologique : l’État y devient, non plus simple garant de l’ordre, mais *opérateur intégral* de normativité sociale. - -Cette période — que l’on peut circonscrire de manière heuristique entre 1870 et 1945 — constitue ainsi un nouveau régime de régulation archicratique. Elle transforme en profondeur chacun des trois pôles de notre grille analytique : *l’arcalité* cesse d’être disciplinaire pour devenir infrastructurelle, *la cratialité* se collectivise, mobilisant les masses dans une logique d’agrégation gestionnaire, et *l’archicration* s’institutionnalise — contractuelle d’un côté (pacte fordiste, sécurité sociale), exterminatrice de l’autre (bureaucratie génocidaire, régulation totalitaire de la vie et de la mort). En ce sens, cette période constitue un moment axial de l’archicration moderne, où son ambivalence structurelle apparaît avec une netteté inédite : elle peut pacifier ou anéantir, organiser le commun ou préparer sa disparition. - -La régulation devient à cette époque un enjeu total : elle s’empare de l’espace (avec les réseaux d’infrastructure nationaux), du temps (avec la standardisation industrielle, les rythmes de production taylorisés), de la valeur (par le compromis fordiste entre salaire et docilité), du risque (avec les premières assurances sociales), mais aussi du *vivant* lui-même (dans les logiques biopolitiques d’hygiène, de sélection et, dans certains régimes, de racialisation et de destruction industrialisée des populations jugées « déviantes » ou « parasites »). L’État devient machine régulatrice — mais ce n’est pas l’État de droit libéral qui s’impose mécaniquement ; c’est une pluralité de formes politiques qui se disputent la maîtrise des dispositifs régulateurs : démocratie parlementaire, autoritarisme planificateur, capitalisme paternaliste, totalitarisme exterminateur. - -La logique archicratique qui s’y déploie est profondément ambivalente. D’un côté, elle vise à stabiliser le social par l’assurance, la norme, le contrat, la prévoyance. Elle inaugure une phase d’institutionnalisation du travail, de sécurisation partielle des parcours de vie, de préfiguration des États sociaux. Mais d’un autre côté, elle installe une rationalité d’ingénierie sociale absolue, qui, sous prétexte d’optimisation ou de purification, peut justifier l’organisation technique de la mort. Cette double face de la régulation — que nous devons penser non comme accident, mais comme *potentiel tensionnel constitutif* — est ce qui rend la période 1870–1945 cruciale pour notre démonstration. - -L’historiographie l’a bien perçu, mais souvent de manière disjointe. L’école wébérienne a souligné la montée d’une *rationalité bureaucratique légale-rationnelle* comme fondement de la domination moderne (Weber, *Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft*, 1922). L’histoire sociale anglo-saxonne a mis en évidence l’émergence d’un *compromis fordiste* basé sur la croissance, le plein emploi et la consommation (Gramsci, *Americanism and Fordism* ; Mandel, *Le troisième âge du capitalisme*). Et l’approche foucaldienne a, dans un geste décisif, révélé la constitution de *biopouvoirs* et de *gouvernementalités disciplinaires* structurant les corps et les conduites (Foucault, *Sécurité, territoire, population*, 1978–79). Mais c’est précisément le croisement de ces lectures — économique, sociologique, politique, épistémologique — que notre modèle archicratique rend possible, en les articulant dans une grammaire unifiée des régimes de régulation. - -La deuxième révolution industrielle doit ainsi être pensée non comme simple prolongement de la première, mais comme inflexion systémique, seuil différentiel, moment de reconfiguration globale des puissances de régulation. C’est une phase de *grande unification régulatoire*, où les dimensions jusque-là disjointes — technique, politique, économique, symbolique — tendent à converger autour d’un même noyau opératoire : la gestion rationnelle des flux humains, matériels et normatifs à des fins de stabilité, de rendement, voire dans certains cas d’élimination. - -Notre tâche, dans cette section, sera donc d’examiner avec précision la manière dont cette régulation se matérialise, se rationalise et se bifurque. Comment elle se spatialise dans les infrastructures d’État (4.3.1), comment elle s’ancre dans une cratialité collective et productiviste (4.3.2), comment elle s’institutionnalise dans un compromis sécurisant mais aussi neutralisant (4.3.3), et enfin, comment elle peut basculer — sans rupture structurelle — vers une archicration exterminatrice (4.3.4), dans laquelle la rationalité régulatrice devient moteur de destruction. - -Cette section ne vise donc pas seulement à restituer l’histoire d’une période, mais à problématiser la nature même de l’archicration moderne : sa puissance de pacification aussi bien que son versant catastrophique. Il ne s’agit pas de trancher moralement, mais de reconnaître dans la régulation une dynamique tensionnelle, historiquement située et politiquement reconfigurable. - -### **4.3.1 – Arcalité infrastructurelle : réseaux techniques, standardisation d’État, gouvernance par les normes** - -La seconde révolution industrielle opère une mutation décisive du rôle des infrastructures techniques dans l’organisation du monde social. L’arcalité, que nous avions définie dans les sections précédentes comme *forme de régulation du pensable, du visible et du faisable*, s’incarne dans des dispositifs massifs et standardisés qui reconfigurent l’armature même du réel. - -L’arcalité devient infrastructurelle : elle s’incarne dans des formes spatiales, matérielles, technologiques et étatiques, qui organisent non plus seulement la discipline des corps (comme dans le régime manchestérien), mais la *condition d’accès au monde* — au sens le plus littéral : routes, rails, canaux, réseaux électriques, normes d’ingénierie, protocoles de mesure, standardisation des unités et des formats, grilles cadastrales, cartes topographiques, lignes de transmission, systèmes postaux, télégraphiques, téléphoniques. Il s’agit d’une reconfiguration des milieux, où ce n’est plus le geste local qui est d’abord régulé, mais l’environnement structurant dans lequel tout geste peut avoir lieu. L’arcalité cesse d’être un encadrement disciplinaire pour devenir une infrastructure de la possibilité. Cette transformation relève d’un basculement épistémologique au sens fort. - -En reprenant la notion foucaldienne d’épistémè comme structure des conditions de possibilité du savoir, l’arcalité infrastructurelle apparaît comme un dispositif non seulement logistique, mais cognitif-normatif : elle structure ce qui peut être dit, vu, mesuré, donc pensé. Là où Foucault décrit des régimes de visibilité historiquement situés, Canguilhem permet de rappeler que la norme est toujours à la fois biologique, sociale et technique. Cette normativité ne relève donc pas d’un simple cadre technique : elle configure les possibilités du vivant à travers des formes intégrées de mesure et d’organisation. Elle rejoint ainsi ce que Supiot identifie comme une ontologie de la mesure, dans laquelle le réel ne vaut qu’à la condition d’être quantifiable. - -Elle constitue le noyau dur de la régulation moderne. Car elle opère une bascule décisive : *rendre le monde gouvernable* non plus en imposant des lois visibles, mais en le structurant à la racine par des formes normées d’organisation matérielle. À la police disciplinaire se substitue l’ingénierie territoriale ; à la codification morale, la planification technico-bureaucratique ; à la règle, la norme. L’État devient planificateur des milieux, plus que prescripteur des comportements. Et cette reconfiguration produit ce que nous devons appeler, dans notre lexique, une *arcalité d’État*. - -Le paradigme de cette transformation se manifeste d’abord dans la prolifération des grands réseaux techniques, qui tissent les sociétés modernes selon une logique d’interconnexion stable, calculable, opératoire. Le rail, par exemple, ne se contente pas de transporter des marchandises ou des individus : il spatialise une temporalité uniforme, il hiérarchise les centres et les périphéries, il impose des cadences, des horaires, des zones de concentration. Il configure le monde en tant qu’espace régulé. Comme l’analyse Wolfgang Schivelbusch dans *The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century* (1977), le chemin de fer introduit une "anesthésie du paysage" et une "tyrannie de l’horaire" : il redéfinit la distance comme fonction de la vitesse, et impose à tous une *temporalité de transit*. - -Plus fondamentalement, ces réseaux introduisent un principe d’unification du monde : à travers eux, la société se dote d’une continuité spatiale et d’une homogénéité temporelle qui deviennent des vecteurs normatifs. Le monde est raccordé, unifié, rendu commensurable. Ce processus est au cœur de ce que Bruno Latour appellera plus tard les *réseaux socio-techniques* (*Nous n’avons jamais été modernes*, 1991), c’est-à-dire ces dispositifs où humains et non-humains coopèrent dans la production d’un monde ordonné. Mais là où Latour insiste sur la symétrie actantielle, il faut rappeler ici que le réseau ne relève pas de la seule interaction : il est aussi planifié, financé et encadré. - -Et c’est ici que l’État moderne opère son retournement fonctionnel. Car ce qui caractérise l’arcalité infrastructurelle, c’est qu’elle repose désormais sur une stratégie d’uniformisation normative, à la fois technique et symbolique. Dans ces mêmes décennies s’imposent alors plusieurs dispositifs décisifs : - -- le système métrique décimal, normalisé au niveau international avec la Convention du Mètre (1875) et son Bureau International des Poids et Mesures ; - -- la standardisation électrique, imposée par les grandes compagnies en lien avec les États pour définir le courant, la tension, les fréquences compatibles (60 Hz aux États-Unis, 50 Hz en Europe) ; - -- les cartes nationales, comme l’Ordnance Survey britannique ou les cartes topographiques militaires françaises (fondées sur la triangulation et la projection conique), qui redessinent le territoire selon une géométrie gouvernable ; - -- la codification industrielle, avec les premières normes d’assemblage, les calibres universels, les standards de production mécanique. - -Tous ces dispositifs, bien qu’hétérogènes, participent d’une même opération régulatoire : rendre le monde calculable et opérable. C’est, au sens de Michel Serres, une mécanisation de l’ordre : toute chose peut être intégrée à un système dès lors qu’existe une grammaire commune de traduction. Et l’arcalité infrastructurelle est précisément cette grammaire. - -Cette arcalité est ontologique. Elle redéfinit ce qui est réel, ce qui est pensable, ce qui est faisable. Car le monde, pour être administré, doit être *réduit* à des formes compatibles avec l’administration. Et cette réduction n’est pas simplement un appauvrissement : elle est une transformation du *régime de vérité* lui-même. Les infrastructures que l’on habite déterminent une part décisive de ce qu’il est possible de penser et de faire. - -Ainsi, les grands réseaux techniques du tournant 1870–1945 ne sont pas de simples outils : ils sont des *régimes de visibilité*, des *modes de spatialisation du pouvoir*, des *structures d’accès au réel*. Ils produisent ce que nous appelons ici une arcalité étatisée, dans laquelle la gouvernance opère non par autorité immédiate, mais par configuration des conditions de possibilité. - -Si l’arcalité infrastructurelle se déploie d’abord dans les grands réseaux de transport, de communication et de distribution, elle trouve sa consistance régulatoire la plus radicale dans l’essor fulgurant de la standardisation industrielle. Elle constitue un régime de normalisation du monde fondé sur l’unification du réel par des formats communs. Ce mouvement n’est pas spontané : il est profondément structuré par les États, les ingénieurs, les militaires et les industriels, qui convergent dans une logique *technicopolitique* d’homogénéisation. - -Cette standardisation ne touche pas seulement les objets, les outils ou les machines : elle modélise aussi les gestes, les flux, les trajectoires et les compatibilités. Elle prolonge ce que Pierre Musso appelle l’imaginaire du réseau, mais en en condensant la puissance régulatoire dans des formes prescriptives qui rendent possible l’interopérabilité à l’échelle industrielle et géopolitique. - -À partir des années 1880, les grandes entreprises mécaniques — comme Westinghouse aux États-Unis, Siemens en Allemagne, Schneider en France — systématisent la production de pièces détachées standardisées, en particulier pour l’armement, la sidérurgie, la construction ferroviaire et navale. Les pas de vis, les embouts, les alésages, les filets, les roues dentées, les pistons sont produits selon des normes de compatibilité définies par des comités techniques nationaux puis internationaux. L’objectif est clair : substituer à la contingence artisanale une logique de modularité systémique. Toute pièce devient remplaçable, chaque système réparable, chaque flux stabilisable. Ce passage du singulier au standard, du geste à la règle, constitue le moment où la matière elle-même devient *gouvernable par la norme*. - -L’invention du calibre industriel s’inscrit ici comme un opérateur archalitaire : il encode la réalité matérielle dans des unités régulées, transmissibles, interchangeables. On assiste à l’émergence d’un droit matériel implicite — un *ius machinarium*, pourrions-nous dire — qui ne passe plus par le texte juridique mais par la métrique d’assemblage. La compatibilité remplace la loi. C’est là l’un des grands basculements de la modernité industrielle : l’ingénieur devient législateur non du comportement, mais de l’articulation des choses. - -Ce processus est encadré par la montée des organismes de normalisation. L’American Standards Association (ASA), fondée en 1918, deviendra l’ANSI ; la Deutsche Institut für Normung (DIN) en Allemagne est fondée en 1917 pour garantir la compatibilité des pièces mécaniques en temps de guerre ; le Bureau de Normalisation des Industries Mécaniques en France est créé dès 1918 dans une logique de reconstruction industrielle. L’Organisation Internationale de Normalisation (ISO) naîtra en 1947, prolongeant cette logique sur le plan global. - -Or, cette standardisation ne reste pas confinée à la sphère industrielle : elle s’étend progressivement à la vie sociale elle-même, en s’articulant aux dimensions régulatoires du vivant, du temps, du territoire. C’est notamment le cas avec la normalisation du temps : l’instauration des fuseaux horaires (Conférence de Washington, 1884), la définition universelle de la seconde comme unité de mesure (Seconde du temps universel, définie en 1929 par l’Union astronomique internationale), et l’imposition du temps moyen de Greenwich (GMT) comme référence planétaire, constituent autant de régulations normatives du *temps social*. - -Ici encore, l’unification temporelle n’est pas une simple convention : elle opère comme un *protocole de synchronisation générale*. L’arcalité n’agit plus localement sur les usages : elle *structure les conditions même de l’usage*. Cette grammaire temporelle, imposée à tous les systèmes de transport, d’administration, de production, de communication, constitue une infrastructure de l’horizon commun — une scène silencieuse de la régulation, invisible mais prescriptive. - -Cette logique de gouvernance technique du réel s’incarne aussi dans les systèmes de mesure universels. Le mètre, la seconde et le kilogramme, définis et conservés au BIPM, deviennent des opérateurs normatifs de la réalité, c’est-à-dire des axes régulateurs du pensable. On ne négocie plus les normes : on les *calibre*. Cette gouvernementalité par la norme est d’autant plus puissante qu’elle échappe à la controverse publique : elle s’impose par la nécessité technique, non par la délibération démocratique. - -Comme l’a rigoureusement montré Michel Foucault dans *La naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), les formes modernes de gouvernementalité ne s’imposent plus exclusivement par le droit souverain, mais par la production active de normes à travers des mécanismes d’efficience, de calcul, et d’autorégulation. Ce qu’il nomme gouvernementalité libérale — et dans sa variante allemande, *ordolibérale* — repose précisément sur cette substitution : le droit n’impose plus la règle, il garantit le cadre au sein duquel la norme peut opérer comme opérateur d’efficience. Dans ce contexte, les standards techniques, les indicateurs métriques, les formats industriels deviennent des quasi-normes juridiques, qui agissent *à la place de la loi*, mais avec une légitimité dérivée du rendement. Il ne s’agit plus de dire ce qui est permis ou interdit, mais de produire un espace dans lequel les comportements se régulent eux-mêmes à travers la métrique. Cette substitution de la juridicité par la normativité technique — qui prolonge mais excède la distinction weberienne entre *droit formel-rationnel* et *droit matériel* — constitue l’un des opérateurs invisibles les plus puissants de l’arcalité infrastructurelle. Comme le souligne aussi Alain Supiot dans *La gouvernance par les nombres* (2015), nous assistons à une substitution du droit par la mesure, du politique par le chiffre, de la norme collective par l’indice global. - -Enfin, cette arcalité infrastructurelle atteint une efficacité régulatoire maximale lorsqu’elle se combine à la modélisation statistique. Les recensements, les enquêtes sanitaires, les cadastres, les bilans énergétiques, les projections économiques deviennent les bases d’une planification d’État. Le cas du Gosplan soviétique, fondé en 1921, en constitue un exemple paradigmatique : l’État ne régule plus par décret, mais par plan, par quota, par projection. L’arcalité devient *structure de la prévision*. La modélisation devient un instrument direct de gouvernement. - -L’arcalité infrastructurelle ne se contente donc pas de brancher, d’unifier et d’interconnecter : elle norme à la racine en réglant le monde par la technique, la standardisation, la métrique et le protocole. Elle constitue une *grammaire matérielle de la régulation*, dans laquelle les objets, les flux, les individus deviennent intégrables à un système *parce qu’ils sont codés selon des standards communs*. L’État moderne, dans ce cadre, régule moins par la loi que par la forme. Il devient topographe de la normativité. - -L’extension des infrastructures techniques et des standards industriels au tournant du XXe siècle n’est pas seulement un fait économique, productif ou technique : elle constitue une reconfiguration spatiale de l’exercice du pouvoir. L’espace cesse d’être un simple décor géographique pour devenir un opérateur de régulation en soi — ce que nous devons nommer *arcalité géogouvernementale*. Loin d’un pouvoir abstrait ou juridico-symbolique, cette forme de régulation s’inscrit dans les réseaux, les flux, les trajets, les points nodaux, et transforme le territoire en *machine logistique*. - -Cette mutation repose sur un changement fondamental dans la nature du territoire lui-même. Dans les régimes préindustriels, le territoire était structuré par des lignes symboliques (frontières, fiefs, paroisses) et des lieux de souveraineté (château, temple, place publique). Il était *hiérarchisé* verticalement, au rythme de l’autorité et du sacré. Avec la deuxième révolution industrielle, ce territoire devient *vectorisé* : ce ne sont plus les lieux qui commandent, mais les lignes qui relient. Ce sont les réseaux — ferroviaires, télégraphiques, hydrauliques, électriques, postaux — qui structurent désormais le pouvoir. Autrement dit, le territoire devient lui-même infrastructure. - -Ce basculement a été parfaitement théorisé par Paul Virilio, qui écrit dans *Vitesse et politique* (1977) que l’espace politique devient désormais celui de la vitesse. Mais cette vitesse n’est pas un simple phénomène mécanique : elle est *régulée* à travers une grille matérielle qui encode les trajectoires autorisées, les vitesses admissibles, les densités productives. Ce que Virilio nomme *dromocratie* — le pouvoir par le contrôle de la vitesse — peut ici être réinscrit dans notre théorie générale de l’*arcalité* : il s’agit bien d’un régime de régulation territorialisée, dans lequel les connexions remplacent les dominations, et où la maîtrise de la circulation devient la scène stratégique du pouvoir. - -Prenons comme première illustration la gouvernance ferroviaire. Dès les années 1870, les grands États industriels (Prusse, France, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis) développent des compagnies nationales de chemin de fer, souvent semi-étatisées, qui maillent le territoire selon des logiques non seulement économiques, mais politiques. Les lignes prioritaires ne sont pas celles de la demande, mais celles de la structuration stratégique du territoire. La Prusse relie les centres sidérurgiques de la Ruhr à Hambourg ; la France connecte Paris à tous les chefs-lieux départementaux (plan Freycinet, 1879) ; les États-Unis quadrillent l’Ouest en territoire productible via le *transcontinental railroad*. - -Ce quadrillage ferroviaire est une matrice de régulation : il crée des zones intégrées, des marges périphériques et des nœuds logistiques. Le train n’est pas seulement un moyen de transport : il est un *vecteur d’unification territoriale* et un *instrument de commandement spatial*. Il établit ce que Fernand Braudel appelait « l’économie-monde » dans *Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme* (1979), mais sur le mode de la régulation connectée : il fait exister l’État industriel dans l’espace en traçant ses lignes d’autorité pratique. - -À cette arcalité ferroviaire s’ajoute une logistique énergétique qui transforme la carte même du territoire. Le déploiement de réseaux électriques à haute tension (notamment à partir des années 1890) redéfinit les hiérarchies spatiales : les vallées hydrauliques (Alpes, Massif central, Jura) deviennent des ressources de puissance ; les villes se structurent autour des centrales, des sous-stations, des pylônes. L’État n’exerce pas seulement sa souveraineté par le droit : il l’ancre dans la distribution de l’énergie. Comme l’a bien analysé Timothy Mitchell dans *Carbon Democracy* (2011), la politique devient dépendante de l’organisation matérielle des réseaux énergétiques, qui conditionnent l’accessibilité, la dépendance, la négociation. - -Ce mouvement atteint un niveau supérieur d’efficience régulatoire avec l’émergence de la logistique industrielle intégrée, notamment aux États-Unis. Dès les années 1910, les grandes firmes (Ford, General Motors, DuPont) organisent des flux de marchandises, de pièces, de matières premières, de main-d’œuvre, selon des schémas de spatialisation millimétrés. Les chaînes d’approvisionnement deviennent des *systèmes régulés*, dans lesquels chaque point géographique (usine, entrepôt, canal, route) est calibré pour minimiser les ruptures de charge et maximiser la vitesse d’exécution. La carte logistique supplante la carte politique. - -Ce phénomène sera amplifié pendant la Première Guerre mondiale, où l’État devient planificateur logistique : il répartit les ressources, synchronise les acheminements, standardise les transports. L’exemple des Services des transports militaires français (STMF) entre 1914 et 1918 en est emblématique : plus de 4000 trains par semaine, synchronisés à la minute près, acheminent les troupes et les fournitures vers les fronts de l’Est. Cette guerre inaugure une logistique étatique totale, où le territoire est entièrement soumis à une *rationalité arcalitaire* : celle de la prévisibilité, de l’optimisation, de la fluidité régulée. - -Ce quadrillage par les flux permet l’émergence de ce que l’on doit nommer une *cartographie régulatoire*. Ce n’est plus la délimitation qui compte (frontières), mais la connectivité (nœuds, hubs, corridors). Ce n’est plus la souveraineté sur une parcelle, mais la maîtrise du trajet. L’*arcalité géogouvernementale* transforme le pouvoir : il ne règne plus par surplomb, mais par passage. Il organise, distribue, synchronise. Il opère par *topologie des connexions*, non par géométrie des souverainetés. - -Enfin, ce modèle d’arcalité spatiale régulée par le réseau atteint sa forme achevée avec les grands projets d’État rationalisés, tels que : - -- Le Tennessee Valley Authority (1933) aux États-Unis, où l’électricité devient un outil de réorganisation sociale ; - -- Le plan de zonage industriel du Troisième Reich, où la production est redistribuée selon une logique de défense territoriale ; - -- Le réseau routier soviétique sous Staline, destiné à permettre à la fois extraction et contrôle politique dans les républiques périphériques. - -Chacun de ces projets montre que l’infrastructure devient désormais une scène majeure du politique. Ce ne sont plus les lois, les votes ou les décrets qui organisent l’existence sociale — ce sont les canalisations, les voies ferrées, les lignes haute tension, les centrales logistiques. C’est ici que l’*arcalité* devient *géo-pouvoir*, c’est-à-dire gouvernement des circulations, des points d’accès, des vitesses de distribution, des possibilités de raccordement. - -Nous devons donc conclure en affirmant ceci : la deuxième révolution industrielle ne se contente pas de mettre en place des standards ou des réseaux. Elle instaure un nouvel ordre géopolitique infra-étatique, dans lequel la régulation passe par l’organisation matérielle des espaces. L’arcalité géogouvernementale n’est pas une simple technique d’aménagement ; elle devient l’un des visages majeurs de la régulation industrielle. - -### **4.3.2 – Cratialité collective : masses productives, rationalisation ouvrière, encadrement syndical** - -La seconde révolution industrielle reconfigure la cratialité : l’effort n’est plus prélevé à l’échelle de l’individu isolé, mais intégré à une masse de travail collectivisée, coordonnée par des dispositifs de synchronisation et de rationalisation. L’unité de la force productive se déplace : du corps singulier vers l’agrégat productif. - -Là où la phase manchestérienne reposait sur une cratialité extractive centrée sur l’individu-geste — bras, cadence, docilité, obéissance — la seconde révolution industrielle inaugure ce que l’on doit désigner comme une *cratialité de masse*. Elle vise à synchroniser les gestes à l’échelle d’un ordre productif global, dans lequel chaque unité humaine devient le segment opératoire d’un corps collectif régulé. - -Cette mutation apparaît dans la montée des grandes unités de production, où l’atelier cède la place à l’usine à flux continus, et où le geste devient séquence. Émerge alors un organon machinique d’ensemble, au sein duquel l’ouvrier est inséré dans une chaîne et relié à d’autres corps opératoires. Le travail devient orchestration — non plus somme de gestes, mais partition cratiale. - -Cette orchestration suppose une nouvelle forme de gouvernement des corps. Elle ne passe plus exclusivement par la contrainte immédiate, mais par des mécanismes de mobilisation et d’intégration plus englobants et normalisateurs. Il s’agit d’obtenir l’ajustement des conduites. L’encadrement productif devient une mise en ordre élargie des comportements, des rythmes et des attentes. - -C’est dans ce contexte que le modèle militaire devient la matrice implicite du pouvoir productif. Le front industriel prend le relais du front guerrier selon une logique militarisée de coordination et de discipline. La guerre de 1914–1918 accélère cette logique, en imposant une mobilisation intégrale de l’appareil productif national. La Shell Crisis de 1915 au Royaume-Uni, provoquée par une pénurie d’obus liée à une désorganisation de la production, marque un tournant : le gouvernement britannique crée le Ministry of Munitions, qui généralise une rationalisation militaire du travail industriel, en imposant horaires fixes, quotas de production, règles d’affectation. La guerre devient alors un laboratoire cratial, où la puissance d’État s’étend directement à l’organisation des usines. - -Un tel régime de mobilisation exige une gestion scientifique du geste, car la puissance de travail ne doit plus être approximative, mais optimisée. C’est ici que le taylorisme trouve son terrain de prédilection : non comme doctrine idéologique, mais comme *technique cratiale*. - -La rationalisation taylorienne du travail, loin d’être une simple doctrine d’organisation technique, constitue un tournant décisif dans l’histoire des régimes cratiaux. En conceptualisant la *division scientifique du travail* comme méthode d’extraction maximale de l’efficience gestuelle, Frederick Winslow Taylor, dans *The Principles of Scientific Management* (1911), modifie en profondeur la manière de concevoir la force productive. L’ouvrier n’est plus sujet de son activité, mais opérateur d’un protocole normé, minuté, prescrit. Son autonomie est dissoute dans une grille d’optimisation qui morcelle le savoir du travail et désactive la subjectivité. - -Ce qui s’instaure, c’est un pouvoir de type algorithmique avant la lettre, fondé non sur le commandement hiérarchique ou la punition arbitraire, mais sur la décomposition et la recomposition du geste selon une logique de rendement. La tâche est divisée en unités minimales, mesurées au chronomètre, observées, calculées, prescrites. Chaque mouvement superflu est traqué, chaque geste codifié, chaque seconde rationalisée. L’effort devient module, séquence, métrique. Le corps est ainsi saisi sous forme mesurable, jusque dans l’obéissance qu’il incorpore. - -Taylor ne vise pas uniquement l’accroissement de la production : il reconfigure la relation entre geste et pouvoir en substituant à l’autonomie ouvrière un régime prescriptif. L’homme y devient l’exécutant d’une rationalité extérieure, désormais indexé à un programme. - -Cette configuration taylorienne trouve sa réalisation concrète, opératoire, systémique, dans le fordisme. Là où Taylor conçoit la norme du geste, Henry Ford enchaîne les gestes eux-mêmes dans une temporalité linéaire irréversible, structurée par la chaîne de montage continue. Ford inscrit la soumission dans le rythme même de la chaîne. L’ouvrier devient élément d’une cadence. La machine fixe la vitesse du geste, la chaîne impose le tempo, la séquence produit la norme. Il n’y a plus de marge de variation. La cratialité tend ainsi à se déposer dans l’automatisme de la chaîne. - -Le modèle Ford de Detroit, à partir de 1913, repose sur cette synchronisation intégrale du corps et du temps. Chaque ouvrier exécute une opération unique, à un rythme défini par le mouvement de la chaîne. La pensée est extériorisée, la coordination est technicisée, la compétence est dévolue à l’ingénieur. L’intelligence du processus est centralisée ; l’exécution, délocalisée dans la masse. Ce phénomène est analysé avec une acuité remarquable par Antonio Gramsci dans ses *Quaderni del carcere*, notamment dans la section consacrée à *Americanism and Fordism* (1934), où il décrit cette rationalisation comme une tentative de refondation anthropologique de la société industrielle. - -Pour Gramsci, le fordisme n’est pas seulement une méthode économique : c’est un *projet de civilisation*, qui vise à créer un nouveau type humain — discipliné, hygiéniste, moralement réformé, sexuellement régulé, éthiquement productif. La fabrique devient ainsi laboratoire de la normalisation intégrale : les gestes sont standardisés, mais aussi les habitudes, les comportements, les corps eux-mêmes. L’ouvrier fordiste ne doit pas seulement bien produire : il doit bien vivre — c’est-à-dire *vivre selon les normes de la production*. Il devient sujet économique dans toutes les sphères de son existence. - -Reich souligne l’intériorisation de la soumission dans ce dispositif. Dans *Psychologie de masse du fascisme* (1933), il place ce mécanisme au cœur de sa critique de la subjectivation autoritaire. Selon lui, la régulation du geste productif par la division scientifique du travail s’accompagne d’une internalisation pulsionnelle du commandement. La soumission n’est plus seulement imposée de l’extérieur : elle devient incorporée et intériorisée. L’ouvrier ne travaille plus seulement pour survivre, mais pour appartenir et se conformer. L’aliénation tend alors à devenir adhésion. - -Ainsi, la cratialité collective opérée par le taylorisme et le fordisme dépasse le cadre strictement économique. Elle agit comme modèle biopolitique, dans lequel les corps, les gestes, les temporalités, les pulsions sont réorganisés selon une logique d’efficience totale. La production devient alors un modèle de gouvernement des vies, et la chaîne de montage l’une des scènes privilégiées de ce pouvoir. La masse laborieuse, orchestrée, normalisée, rationalisée, incarne un réservoir discipliné de la puissance d’État et de l’expansion industrielle. - -La Première Guerre mondiale militarise la production et généralise la rationalisation du travail qui devient une ressource stratégique intégrée à une guerre d’usure. La production industrielle cesse d’être un processus relativement autonome d’accumulation : elle devient un opérateur logistique de la puissance étatique. L’arrière se militarise, l’usine est intégrée au front, et le salarié tend à devenir un soldat productif. - -Le cas britannique n’est pas isolé. En France, les usines d’armement sont placées sous surveillance militaire, les grèves interdites, les horaires étendus, les congés supprimés. L’État réquisitionne les corps au même titre que les matières premières. La distinction entre production et défense, entre économie et stratégie, s’effondre. L’effort se militarise, et la cratialité tend à se généraliser à l’échelle de l’appareil productif. - -Mais cette militarisation ne s’arrête pas avec l’armistice. La guerre a produit un effet irréversible : elle a démontré que le travail peut être commandé comme un bataillon, organisé comme une armée, régulé comme un front. Ce que la période de 1914–1918 opère, c’est une *transformation structurelle du travail en vecteur de puissance étatique*. L’organisation scientifique des forces productives devient une condition de souveraineté. Et c’est précisément sur cette base que se construira, dans l’entre-deux-guerres, une institutionnalisation progressive de la co-participation syndicale à la régulation productive. - -Le syndicat, traditionnellement opposé à l’autorité patronale, est progressivement intégré à l’appareil de régulation. Le conflit tend alors à être converti en co-gestion et l’antagonisme en négociation. Le modèle allemand en offre l’exemple le plus net : dès les années 1920, sous la République de Weimar, les syndicats obtiennent des sièges dans les conseils d’entreprise (*Betriebsräte*) ; en 1920 est votée la *Betriebsrätegesetz*, qui instaure une représentation ouvrière obligatoire dans les entreprises de plus de 20 salariés. Ce mouvement trouvera son plein développement après guerre, mais il est déjà en germe dans l’entre-deux-guerres : le syndicat devient un organe de régulation plus qu’un pur opérateur de subversion. - -Cette logique d’intégration ne suspend pas la cratialité ; elle en approfondit l’exercice. En faisant du syndicat une interface régulatrice entre la masse salariale et les instances de direction, le système industriel stabilise une part de ses tensions internes. Il normalise le conflit en l’inscrivant dans une négociation réglée. La co-gestion devient une forme de codification du pouvoir dans l’appareil syndical. - -Aux États-Unis, la trajectoire est différente mais convergente. Le *National Labor Relations Act* (Wagner Act, 1935) ne prévoit pas la cogestion, mais renforce l’intégration des syndicats dans la négociation collective. Le *collective bargaining* devient mécanisme institutionnel de régulation des conflits, et les grandes fédérations syndicales (notamment la CIO) participent activement à la construction du *New Deal productif* voulu par Roosevelt. Dans les faits, les conventions collectives deviennent des instruments de gouvernement du travail, organisant salaires, horaires et prestations sociales dans une logique de pacification intégrée. Là encore, le syndicat cesse d’être force antagoniste pour devenir acteur de la stabilisation cratiale. - -Cette logique de rationalisation s’illustre de manière exemplaire dans le cas des usines Renault sous la IIIᵉ République, notamment à partir de 1936, où la mise en place des congés payés, de la semaine de 40 heures et des délégués ouvriers s’inscrit dans un double mouvement : pacification sociale par intégration, et structuration étatique des rapports de production. L’État intervient ici à la fois comme arbitre et comme organisateur — il contraint les entreprises à réguler leur commandement, mais confie cette régulation aux représentants syndiqués. - -Mais ce mouvement de rationalisation n’est pas sans ambiguïté. Il porte en lui une dérive potentielle : celle d’une disciplinarisation douce, d’une gouvernementalité consensuelle qui, sous couvert de justice sociale, perpétue l’automatisation de la soumission. La co-participation syndicale peut aussi devenir un instrument de canalisation du mécontentement et de neutralisation du dissensus. En intégrant la contestation dans le cadre, elle la désactive. En codifiant le conflit, elle en épuise la puissance instituante. - -Dans *Psychologie de masse du fascisme* (1933), Reich suggère que certaines formes de régulation des masses laborieuses favorisent une intériorisation de la soumission. L’organisation devient horizon, la régularité une valeur, la discipline un motif de fierté ; la cratialité n’a dès lors plus besoin de forcer autant, parce qu’elle tend à être désirée. - -Detroit, Billancourt et l’Italie fasciste donnent à voir des inflexions distinctes de la régulation cratiale appliquée à la puissance collective. Ces trois cas ne doivent donc pas être lus comme déclinaisons uniformes du fordisme, mais comme trois modalités spécifiques de la mise en scène du pouvoir régulateur sur la masse productive. +Ce qui s'ouvre avec la seconde révolution industrielle n'est pas une +simple continuité technologique ni une extension capitalistique : c'est +une recomposition fondamentale du système régulatoire et du rôle de +l'État moderne. Dans les sociétés industrielles avancées, de l'Europe +occidentale aux États-Unis en passant par la Russie devenue soviétique, +s'opère alors un basculement de paradigme dans la manière d'organiser, +d'encadrer et de redistribuer les puissances d'agir humaines. Si la +première révolution industrielle avait déjà inauguré une forme de +régulation mécanisée, localisée, informelle, souvent instable, +structurée par la fabrique, la seconde opère une montée en généralité et +en abstraction, en un mot, une étatisation de la régulation. Elle +n'étend pas seulement les dispositifs de contrôle ; elle en redéfinit la +scène ontologique : l'État y devient, non plus simple garant de l'ordre, +mais *opérateur intégral* de normativité sociale. + +Cette période — que l'on peut circonscrire de manière heuristique +entre 1870 et 1945 — constitue ainsi un nouveau régime de régulation +archicratique. Elle transforme en profondeur chacun des trois pôles de +notre grille analytique : *l'arcalité* cesse d'être disciplinaire pour +devenir infrastructurelle, *la cratialité* se collectivise, mobilisant +les masses dans une logique d'agrégation gestionnaire, et +*l'archicration* s'institutionnalise — contractuelle d'un côté (pacte +fordiste, sécurité sociale), exterminatrice de l'autre (bureaucratie +génocidaire, régulation totalitaire de la vie et de la mort). En ce +sens, cette période constitue un moment axial de l'archicration moderne, +où son ambivalence structurelle apparaît avec une netteté inédite : elle +peut pacifier ou anéantir, organiser le commun ou préparer sa +disparition. + +La régulation devient à cette époque un enjeu total : elle s'empare de +l'espace (avec les réseaux d'infrastructure nationaux), du temps (avec +la standardisation industrielle, les rythmes de production taylorisés), +de la valeur (par le compromis fordiste entre salaire et docilité), du +risque (avec les premières assurances sociales), mais aussi du *vivant* +lui-même (dans les logiques biopolitiques d'hygiène, de sélection et, +dans certains régimes, de racialisation et de destruction industrialisée +des populations jugées « déviantes » ou « parasites »). L'État devient +machine régulatrice — mais ce n'est pas l'État de droit libéral qui +s'impose mécaniquement ; c'est une pluralité de formes politiques qui se +disputent la maîtrise des dispositifs régulateurs : démocratie +parlementaire, autoritarisme planificateur, capitalisme paternaliste, +totalitarisme exterminateur. + +La logique archicratique qui s'y déploie est profondément ambivalente. +D'un côté, elle vise à stabiliser le social par l'assurance, la norme, +le contrat, la prévoyance. Elle inaugure une phase +d'institutionnalisation du travail, de sécurisation partielle des +parcours de vie, de préfiguration des États sociaux. Mais d'un autre +côté, elle installe une rationalité d'ingénierie sociale absolue, qui, +sous prétexte d'optimisation ou de purification, peut justifier +l'organisation technique de la mort. Cette double face de la régulation — que nous devons penser non comme accident, mais comme *potentiel +tensionnel constitutif* — est ce qui rend la période 1870–1945 +cruciale pour notre démonstration. + +L'historiographie l'a bien perçu, mais souvent de manière disjointe. +L'école wébérienne a souligné la montée d'une *rationalité +bureaucratique légale-rationnelle* comme fondement de la domination +moderne (Weber, *Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft*, 1922). L'histoire sociale +anglo-saxonne a mis en évidence l'émergence d'un *compromis fordiste* +basé sur la croissance, le plein emploi et la consommation (Gramsci, +*Americanism and Fordism* ; Mandel, *Le troisième âge du capitalisme*). +Et l'approche foucaldienne a, dans un geste décisif, révélé la +constitution de *biopouvoirs* et de *gouvernementalités disciplinaires* +structurant les corps et les conduites (Foucault, *Sécurité, territoire, +population*, 1978–79). Mais c'est précisément le croisement de ces +lectures — économique, sociologique, politique, épistémologique — que notre modèle archicratique rend possible, en les articulant dans une +grammaire unifiée des régimes de régulation. + +La deuxième révolution industrielle doit ainsi être pensée non comme +simple prolongement de la première, mais comme inflexion systémique, +seuil différentiel, moment de reconfiguration globale des puissances de +régulation. C'est une phase de *grande unification régulatoire*, où les +dimensions jusque-là disjointes — technique, politique, économique, +symbolique — tendent à converger autour d'un même noyau opératoire : +la gestion rationnelle des flux humains, matériels et normatifs à des +fins de stabilité, de rendement, voire dans certains cas d'élimination. + +Notre tâche, dans cette section, sera donc d'examiner avec précision la +manière dont cette régulation se matérialise, se rationalise et se +bifurque. Comment elle se spatialise dans les infrastructures d'État +(4.3.1), comment elle s'ancre dans une cratialité collective et +productiviste (4.3.2), comment elle s'institutionnalise dans un +compromis sécurisant mais aussi neutralisant (4.3.3), et enfin, comment +elle peut basculer — sans rupture structurelle — vers une +archicration exterminatrice (4.3.4), dans laquelle la rationalité +régulatrice devient moteur de destruction. + +Cette section ne vise donc pas seulement à restituer l'histoire d'une +période, mais à problématiser la nature même de l'archicration moderne : +sa puissance de pacification aussi bien que son versant catastrophique. +Il ne s'agit pas de trancher moralement, mais de reconnaître dans la +régulation une dynamique tensionnelle, historiquement située et +politiquement reconfigurable. + +### **4.3.1 — Arcalité infrastructurelle : réseaux techniques, standardisation d'État, gouvernance par les normes** + +La seconde révolution industrielle opère une mutation décisive du rôle +des infrastructures techniques dans l'organisation du monde social. +L'arcalité, que nous avions définie dans les sections précédentes comme +*forme de régulation du pensable, du visible et du faisable*, s'incarne +dans des dispositifs massifs et standardisés qui reconfigurent +l'armature même du réel. + +L'arcalité devient infrastructurelle : elle s'incarne dans des formes +spatiales, matérielles, technologiques et étatiques, qui organisent non +plus seulement la discipline des corps (comme dans le régime +manchestérien), mais la *condition d'accès au monde* — au sens le plus +littéral : routes, rails, canaux, réseaux électriques, normes +d'ingénierie, protocoles de mesure, standardisation des unités et des +formats, grilles cadastrales, cartes topographiques, lignes de +transmission, systèmes postaux, télégraphiques, téléphoniques. Il s'agit +d'une reconfiguration des milieux, où ce n'est plus le geste local qui +est d'abord régulé, mais l'environnement structurant dans lequel tout +geste peut avoir lieu. L'arcalité cesse d'être un encadrement +disciplinaire pour devenir une infrastructure de la possibilité. Cette +transformation relève d'un basculement épistémologique au sens fort. + +En reprenant la notion foucaldienne d'épistémè comme structure des +conditions de possibilité du savoir, l'arcalité infrastructurelle +apparaît comme un dispositif non seulement logistique, mais +cognitif-normatif : elle structure ce qui peut être dit, vu, mesuré, +donc pensé. Là où Foucault décrit des régimes de visibilité +historiquement situés, Canguilhem permet de rappeler que la norme est +toujours à la fois biologique, sociale et technique. Cette normativité +ne relève donc pas d'un simple cadre technique : elle configure les +possibilités du vivant à travers des formes intégrées de mesure et +d'organisation. Elle rejoint ainsi ce que Supiot identifie comme une +ontologie de la mesure, dans laquelle le réel ne vaut qu'à la condition +d'être quantifiable. + +Elle constitue le noyau dur de la régulation moderne. Car elle opère une +bascule décisive : *rendre le monde gouvernable* non plus en imposant +des lois visibles, mais en le structurant à la racine par des formes +normées d'organisation matérielle. À la police disciplinaire se +substitue l'ingénierie territoriale ; à la codification morale, la +planification technico-bureaucratique ; à la règle, la norme. L'État +devient planificateur des milieux, plus que prescripteur des +comportements. Et cette reconfiguration produit ce que nous devons +appeler, dans notre lexique, une *arcalité d'État*. + +Le paradigme de cette transformation se manifeste d'abord dans la +prolifération des grands réseaux techniques, qui tissent les sociétés +modernes selon une logique d'interconnexion stable, calculable, +opératoire. Le rail, par exemple, ne se contente pas de transporter des +marchandises ou des individus : il spatialise une temporalité uniforme, +il hiérarchise les centres et les périphéries, il impose des cadences, +des horaires, des zones de concentration. Il configure le monde en tant +qu'espace régulé. Comme l'analyse Wolfgang Schivelbusch dans *The +Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th +Century* (1977), le chemin de fer introduit une "anesthésie du paysage" +et une "tyrannie de l'horaire" : il redéfinit la distance comme fonction +de la vitesse, et impose à tous une *temporalité de transit*. + +Plus fondamentalement, ces réseaux introduisent un principe +d'unification du monde : à travers eux, la société se dote d'une +continuité spatiale et d'une homogénéité temporelle qui deviennent des +vecteurs normatifs. Le monde est raccordé, unifié, rendu commensurable. +Ce processus est au cœur de ce que Bruno Latour appellera plus tard les +*réseaux socio-techniques* (*Nous n'avons jamais été modernes*, 1991), +c'est-à-dire ces dispositifs où humains et non-humains coopèrent dans la +production d'un monde ordonné. Mais là où Latour insiste sur la symétrie +actantielle, il faut rappeler ici que le réseau ne relève pas de la +seule interaction : il est aussi planifié, financé et encadré. + +Et c'est ici que l'État moderne opère son retournement fonctionnel. Car +ce qui caractérise l'arcalité infrastructurelle, c'est qu'elle repose +désormais sur une stratégie d'uniformisation normative, à la fois +technique et symbolique. Dans ces mêmes décennies s'imposent alors +plusieurs dispositifs décisifs : + +- le système métrique décimal, normalisé au niveau international avec la + Convention du Mètre (1875) et son Bureau International des Poids et + Mesures ; + +- la standardisation électrique, imposée par les grandes compagnies en + lien avec les États pour définir le courant, la tension, les + fréquences compatibles (60 Hz aux États-Unis, 50 Hz en Europe) ; + +- les cartes nationales, comme l'Ordnance Survey britannique ou les + cartes topographiques militaires françaises (fondées sur la + triangulation et la projection conique), qui redessinent le territoire + selon une géométrie gouvernable ; + +- la codification industrielle, avec les premières normes d'assemblage, + les calibres universels, les standards de production mécanique. + +Tous ces dispositifs, bien qu'hétérogènes, participent d'une même +opération régulatoire : rendre le monde calculable et opérable. C'est, +au sens de Michel Serres, une mécanisation de l'ordre : toute chose peut +être intégrée à un système dès lors qu'existe une grammaire commune de +traduction. Et l'arcalité infrastructurelle est précisément cette +grammaire. + +Cette arcalité est ontologique. Elle redéfinit ce qui est réel, ce qui +est pensable, ce qui est faisable. Car le monde, pour être administré, +doit être *réduit* à des formes compatibles avec l'administration. Et +cette réduction n'est pas simplement un appauvrissement : elle est une +transformation du *régime de vérité* lui-même. Les infrastructures que +l'on habite déterminent une part décisive de ce qu'il est possible de +penser et de faire. + +Ainsi, les grands réseaux techniques du tournant 1870–1945 ne sont pas +de simples outils : ils sont des *régimes de visibilité*, des *modes de +spatialisation du pouvoir*, des *structures d'accès au réel*. Ils +produisent ce que nous appelons ici une arcalité étatisée, dans laquelle +la gouvernance opère non par autorité immédiate, mais par configuration +des conditions de possibilité. + +Si l'arcalité infrastructurelle se déploie d'abord dans les grands +réseaux de transport, de communication et de distribution, elle trouve +sa consistance régulatoire la plus radicale dans l'essor fulgurant de la +standardisation industrielle. Elle constitue un régime de normalisation +du monde fondé sur l'unification du réel par des formats communs. Ce +mouvement n'est pas spontané : il est profondément structuré par les +États, les ingénieurs, les militaires et les industriels, qui convergent +dans une logique *technicopolitique* d'homogénéisation. + +Cette standardisation ne touche pas seulement les objets, les outils ou +les machines : elle modélise aussi les gestes, les flux, les +trajectoires et les compatibilités. Elle prolonge ce que Pierre Musso +appelle l'imaginaire du réseau, mais en en condensant la puissance +régulatoire dans des formes prescriptives qui rendent possible +l'interopérabilité à l'échelle industrielle et géopolitique. + +À partir des années 1880, les grandes entreprises mécaniques — comme +Westinghouse aux États-Unis, Siemens en Allemagne, Schneider en France — systématisent la production de pièces détachées standardisées, en +particulier pour l'armement, la sidérurgie, la construction ferroviaire +et navale. Les pas de vis, les embouts, les alésages, les filets, les +roues dentées, les pistons sont produits selon des normes de +compatibilité définies par des comités techniques nationaux puis +internationaux. L'objectif est clair : substituer à la contingence +artisanale une logique de modularité systémique. Toute pièce devient +remplaçable, chaque système réparable, chaque flux stabilisable. Ce +passage du singulier au standard, du geste à la règle, constitue le +moment où la matière elle-même devient *gouvernable par la norme*. + +L'invention du calibre industriel s'inscrit ici comme un opérateur +archalitaire : il encode la réalité matérielle dans des unités régulées, +transmissibles, interchangeables. On assiste à l'émergence d'un droit +matériel implicite — un *ius machinarium*, pourrions-nous dire — qui +ne passe plus par le texte juridique mais par la métrique d'assemblage. +La compatibilité remplace la loi. C'est là l'un des grands basculements +de la modernité industrielle : l'ingénieur devient législateur non du +comportement, mais de l'articulation des choses. + +Ce processus est encadré par la montée des organismes de normalisation. +L'American Standards Association (ASA), fondée en 1918, deviendra l'ANSI +; la Deutsche Institut für Normung (DIN) en Allemagne est fondée en 1917 +pour garantir la compatibilité des pièces mécaniques en temps de guerre +; le Bureau de Normalisation des Industries Mécaniques en France est +créé dès 1918 dans une logique de reconstruction industrielle. +L'Organisation Internationale de Normalisation (ISO) naîtra en 1947, +prolongeant cette logique sur le plan global. + +Or, cette standardisation ne reste pas confinée à la sphère industrielle +: elle s'étend progressivement à la vie sociale elle-même, en +s'articulant aux dimensions régulatoires du vivant, du temps, du +territoire. C'est notamment le cas avec la normalisation du temps : +l'instauration des fuseaux horaires (Conférence de Washington, 1884), la +définition universelle de la seconde comme unité de mesure (Seconde du +temps universel, définie en 1929 par l'Union astronomique +internationale), et l'imposition du temps moyen de Greenwich (GMT) comme +référence planétaire, constituent autant de régulations normatives du +*temps social*. + +Ici encore, l'unification temporelle n'est pas une simple convention : +elle opère comme un *protocole de synchronisation générale*. L'arcalité +n'agit plus localement sur les usages : elle *structure les conditions +même de l'usage*. Cette grammaire temporelle, imposée à tous les +systèmes de transport, d'administration, de production, de +communication, constitue une infrastructure de l'horizon commun — une +scène silencieuse de la régulation, invisible mais prescriptive. + +Cette logique de gouvernance technique du réel s'incarne aussi dans les +systèmes de mesure universels. Le mètre, la seconde et le kilogramme, +définis et conservés au BIPM, deviennent des opérateurs normatifs de la +réalité, c'est-à-dire des axes régulateurs du pensable. On ne négocie +plus les normes : on les *calibre*. Cette gouvernementalité par la norme +est d'autant plus puissante qu'elle échappe à la controverse publique : +elle s'impose par la nécessité technique, non par la délibération +démocratique. + +Comme l'a rigoureusement montré Michel Foucault dans *La naissance de la +biopolitique* (1979), les formes modernes de gouvernementalité ne +s'imposent plus exclusivement par le droit souverain, mais par la +production active de normes à travers des mécanismes d'efficience, de +calcul, et d'autorégulation. Ce qu'il nomme gouvernementalité libérale — et dans sa variante allemande, *ordolibérale* — repose précisément +sur cette substitution : le droit n'impose plus la règle, il garantit le +cadre au sein duquel la norme peut opérer comme opérateur d'efficience. +Dans ce contexte, les standards techniques, les indicateurs métriques, +les formats industriels deviennent des quasi-normes juridiques, qui +agissent *à la place de la loi*, mais avec une légitimité dérivée du +rendement. Il ne s'agit plus de dire ce qui est permis ou interdit, mais +de produire un espace dans lequel les comportements se régulent +eux-mêmes à travers la métrique. Cette substitution de la juridicité par +la normativité technique — qui prolonge mais excède la distinction +weberienne entre *droit formel-rationnel* et *droit matériel* — constitue l'un des opérateurs invisibles les plus puissants de +l'arcalité infrastructurelle. Comme le souligne aussi Alain Supiot dans +*La gouvernance par les nombres* (2015), nous assistons à une +substitution du droit par la mesure, du politique par le chiffre, de la +norme collective par l'indice global. + +Enfin, cette arcalité infrastructurelle atteint une efficacité +régulatoire maximale lorsqu'elle se combine à la modélisation +statistique. Les recensements, les enquêtes sanitaires, les cadastres, +les bilans énergétiques, les projections économiques deviennent les +bases d'une planification d'État. Le cas du Gosplan soviétique, fondé en +1921, en constitue un exemple paradigmatique : l'État ne régule plus par +décret, mais par plan, par quota, par projection. L'arcalité devient +*structure de la prévision*. La modélisation devient un instrument +direct de gouvernement. + +L'arcalité infrastructurelle ne se contente donc pas de brancher, +d'unifier et d'interconnecter : elle norme à la racine en réglant le +monde par la technique, la standardisation, la métrique et le protocole. +Elle constitue une *grammaire matérielle de la régulation*, dans +laquelle les objets, les flux, les individus deviennent intégrables à un +système *parce qu'ils sont codés selon des standards communs*. L'État +moderne, dans ce cadre, régule moins par la loi que par la forme. Il +devient topographe de la normativité. + +L'extension des infrastructures techniques et des standards industriels +au tournant du XXe siècle n'est pas seulement un fait économique, +productif ou technique : elle constitue une reconfiguration spatiale de +l'exercice du pouvoir. L'espace cesse d'être un simple décor +géographique pour devenir un opérateur de régulation en soi — ce que +nous devons nommer *arcalité géogouvernementale*. Loin d'un pouvoir +abstrait ou juridico-symbolique, cette forme de régulation s'inscrit +dans les réseaux, les flux, les trajets, les points nodaux, et +transforme le territoire en *machine logistique*. + +Cette mutation repose sur un changement fondamental dans la nature du +territoire lui-même. Dans les régimes préindustriels, le territoire +était structuré par des lignes symboliques (frontières, fiefs, +paroisses) et des lieux de souveraineté (château, temple, place +publique). Il était *hiérarchisé* verticalement, au rythme de l'autorité +et du sacré. Avec la deuxième révolution industrielle, ce territoire +devient *vectorisé* : ce ne sont plus les lieux qui commandent, mais les +lignes qui relient. Ce sont les réseaux — ferroviaires, +télégraphiques, hydrauliques, électriques, postaux — qui structurent +désormais le pouvoir. Autrement dit, le territoire devient lui-même +infrastructure. + +Ce basculement a été parfaitement théorisé par Paul Virilio, qui écrit +dans *Vitesse et politique* (1977) que l'espace politique devient +désormais celui de la vitesse. Mais cette vitesse n'est pas un simple +phénomène mécanique : elle est *régulée* à travers une grille matérielle +qui encode les trajectoires autorisées, les vitesses admissibles, les +densités productives. Ce que Virilio nomme *dromocratie* — le pouvoir +par le contrôle de la vitesse — peut ici être réinscrit dans notre +théorie générale de l'*arcalité* : il s'agit bien d'un régime de +régulation territorialisée, dans lequel les connexions remplacent les +dominations, et où la maîtrise de la circulation devient la scène +stratégique du pouvoir. + +Prenons comme première illustration la gouvernance ferroviaire. Dès les +années 1870, les grands États industriels (Prusse, France, Royaume-Uni, +États-Unis) développent des compagnies nationales de chemin de fer, +souvent semi-étatisées, qui maillent le territoire selon des logiques +non seulement économiques, mais politiques. Les lignes prioritaires ne +sont pas celles de la demande, mais celles de la structuration +stratégique du territoire. La Prusse relie les centres sidérurgiques de +la Ruhr à Hambourg ; la France connecte Paris à tous les chefs-lieux +départementaux (plan Freycinet, 1879) ; les États-Unis quadrillent +l'Ouest en territoire productible via le *transcontinental railroad*. + +Ce quadrillage ferroviaire est une matrice de régulation : il crée des +zones intégrées, des marges périphériques et des nœuds logistiques. Le +train n'est pas seulement un moyen de transport : il est un *vecteur +d'unification territoriale* et un *instrument de commandement spatial*. +Il établit ce que Fernand Braudel appelait « l'économie-monde » dans +*Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme* (1979), mais sur le +mode de la régulation connectée : il fait exister l'État industriel dans +l'espace en traçant ses lignes d'autorité pratique. + +À cette arcalité ferroviaire s'ajoute une logistique énergétique qui +transforme la carte même du territoire. Le déploiement de réseaux +électriques à haute tension (notamment à partir des années 1890) +redéfinit les hiérarchies spatiales : les vallées hydrauliques (Alpes, +Massif central, Jura) deviennent des ressources de puissance ; les +villes se structurent autour des centrales, des sous-stations, des +pylônes. L'État n'exerce pas seulement sa souveraineté par le droit : il +l'ancre dans la distribution de l'énergie. Comme l'a bien analysé +Timothy Mitchell dans *Carbon Democracy* (2011), la politique devient +dépendante de l'organisation matérielle des réseaux énergétiques, qui +conditionnent l'accessibilité, la dépendance, la négociation. + +Ce mouvement atteint un niveau supérieur d'efficience régulatoire avec +l'émergence de la logistique industrielle intégrée, notamment aux +États-Unis. Dès les années 1910, les grandes firmes (Ford, General +Motors, DuPont) organisent des flux de marchandises, de pièces, de +matières premières, de main-d'œuvre, selon des schémas de spatialisation +millimétrés. Les chaînes d'approvisionnement deviennent des *systèmes +régulés*, dans lesquels chaque point géographique (usine, entrepôt, +canal, route) est calibré pour minimiser les ruptures de charge et +maximiser la vitesse d'exécution. La carte logistique supplante la carte +politique. + +Ce phénomène sera amplifié pendant la Première Guerre mondiale, où +l'État devient planificateur logistique : il répartit les ressources, +synchronise les acheminements, standardise les transports. L'exemple des +Services des transports militaires français (STMF) entre 1914 et 1918 en +est emblématique : plus de 4000 trains par semaine, synchronisés à la +minute près, acheminent les troupes et les fournitures vers les fronts +de l'Est. Cette guerre inaugure une logistique étatique totale, où le +territoire est entièrement soumis à une *rationalité arcalitaire* : +celle de la prévisibilité, de l'optimisation, de la fluidité régulée. + +Ce quadrillage par les flux permet l'émergence de ce que l'on doit +nommer une *cartographie régulatoire*. Ce n'est plus la délimitation qui +compte (frontières), mais la connectivité (nœuds, hubs, corridors). Ce +n'est plus la souveraineté sur une parcelle, mais la maîtrise du trajet. +L'*arcalité géogouvernementale* transforme le pouvoir : il ne règne plus +par surplomb, mais par passage. Il organise, distribue, synchronise. Il +opère par *topologie des connexions*, non par géométrie des +souverainetés. + +Enfin, ce modèle d'arcalité spatiale régulée par le réseau atteint sa +forme achevée avec les grands projets d'État rationalisés, tels que : + +- Le Tennessee Valley Authority (1933) aux États-Unis, où l'électricité + devient un outil de réorganisation sociale ; + +- Le plan de zonage industriel du Troisième Reich, où la production est + redistribuée selon une logique de défense territoriale ; + +- Le réseau routier soviétique sous Staline, destiné à permettre à la + fois extraction et contrôle politique dans les républiques + périphériques. + +Chacun de ces projets montre que l'infrastructure devient désormais une +scène majeure du politique. Ce ne sont plus les lois, les votes ou les +décrets qui organisent l'existence sociale — ce sont les +canalisations, les voies ferrées, les lignes haute tension, les +centrales logistiques. C'est ici que l'*arcalité* devient *géo-pouvoir*, +c'est-à-dire gouvernement des circulations, des points d'accès, des +vitesses de distribution, des possibilités de raccordement. + +Nous devons donc conclure en affirmant ceci : la deuxième révolution +industrielle ne se contente pas de mettre en place des standards ou des +réseaux. Elle instaure un nouvel ordre géopolitique infra-étatique, dans +lequel la régulation passe par l'organisation matérielle des espaces. +L'arcalité géogouvernementale n'est pas une simple technique +d'aménagement ; elle devient l'un des visages majeurs de la régulation +industrielle. + +### **4.3.2 — Cratialité collective : masses productives, rationalisation ouvrière, encadrement syndical** + +La seconde révolution industrielle reconfigure la cratialité : l'effort +n'est plus prélevé à l'échelle de l'individu isolé, mais intégré à une +masse de travail collectivisée, coordonnée par des dispositifs de +synchronisation et de rationalisation. L'unité de la force productive se +déplace : du corps singulier vers l'agrégat productif. + +Là où la phase manchestérienne reposait sur une cratialité extractive +centrée sur l'individu-geste — bras, cadence, docilité, obéissance — la seconde révolution industrielle inaugure ce que l'on doit désigner +comme une *cratialité de masse*. Elle vise à synchroniser les gestes à +l'échelle d'un ordre productif global, dans lequel chaque unité humaine +devient le segment opératoire d'un corps collectif régulé. + +Cette mutation apparaît dans la montée des grandes unités de production, +où l'atelier cède la place à l'usine à flux continus, et où le geste +devient séquence. Émerge alors un organon machinique d'ensemble, au sein +duquel l'ouvrier est inséré dans une chaîne et relié à d'autres corps +opératoires. Le travail devient orchestration — non plus somme de +gestes, mais partition cratiale. + +Cette orchestration suppose une nouvelle forme de gouvernement des +corps. Elle ne passe plus exclusivement par la contrainte immédiate, +mais par des mécanismes de mobilisation et d'intégration plus englobants +et normalisateurs. Il s'agit d'obtenir l'ajustement des conduites. +L'encadrement productif devient une mise en ordre élargie des +comportements, des rythmes et des attentes. + +C'est dans ce contexte que le modèle militaire devient la matrice +implicite du pouvoir productif. Le front industriel prend le relais du +front guerrier selon une logique militarisée de coordination et de +discipline. La guerre de 1914–1918 accélère cette logique, en imposant +une mobilisation intégrale de l'appareil productif national. La Shell +Crisis de 1915 au Royaume-Uni, provoquée par une pénurie d'obus liée à +une désorganisation de la production, marque un tournant : le +gouvernement britannique crée le Ministry of Munitions, qui généralise +une rationalisation militaire du travail industriel, en imposant +horaires fixes, quotas de production, règles d'affectation. La guerre +devient alors un laboratoire cratial, où la puissance d'État s'étend +directement à l'organisation des usines. + +Un tel régime de mobilisation exige une gestion scientifique du geste, +car la puissance de travail ne doit plus être approximative, mais +optimisée. C'est ici que le taylorisme trouve son terrain de +prédilection : non comme doctrine idéologique, mais comme *technique +cratiale*. + +La rationalisation taylorienne du travail, loin d'être une simple +doctrine d'organisation technique, constitue un tournant décisif dans +l'histoire des régimes cratiaux. En conceptualisant la *division +scientifique du travail* comme méthode d'extraction maximale de +l'efficience gestuelle, Frederick Winslow Taylor, dans *The Principles +of Scientific Management* (1911), modifie en profondeur la manière de +concevoir la force productive. L'ouvrier n'est plus sujet de son +activité, mais opérateur d'un protocole normé, minuté, prescrit. Son +autonomie est dissoute dans une grille d'optimisation qui morcelle le +savoir du travail et désactive la subjectivité. + +Ce qui s'instaure, c'est un pouvoir de type algorithmique avant la +lettre, fondé non sur le commandement hiérarchique ou la punition +arbitraire, mais sur la décomposition et la recomposition du geste selon +une logique de rendement. La tâche est divisée en unités minimales, +mesurées au chronomètre, observées, calculées, prescrites. Chaque +mouvement superflu est traqué, chaque geste codifié, chaque seconde +rationalisée. L'effort devient module, séquence, métrique. Le corps est +ainsi saisi sous forme mesurable, jusque dans l'obéissance qu'il +incorpore. + +Taylor ne vise pas uniquement l'accroissement de la production : il +reconfigure la relation entre geste et pouvoir en substituant à +l'autonomie ouvrière un régime prescriptif. L'homme y devient +l'exécutant d'une rationalité extérieure, désormais indexé à un +programme. + +Cette configuration taylorienne trouve sa réalisation concrète, +opératoire, systémique, dans le fordisme. Là où Taylor conçoit la norme +du geste, Henry Ford enchaîne les gestes eux-mêmes dans une temporalité +linéaire irréversible, structurée par la chaîne de montage continue. +Ford inscrit la soumission dans le rythme même de la chaîne. L'ouvrier +devient élément d'une cadence. La machine fixe la vitesse du geste, la +chaîne impose le tempo, la séquence produit la norme. Il n'y a plus de +marge de variation. La cratialité tend ainsi à se déposer dans +l'automatisme de la chaîne. + +Le modèle Ford de Detroit, à partir de 1913, repose sur cette +synchronisation intégrale du corps et du temps. Chaque ouvrier exécute +une opération unique, à un rythme défini par le mouvement de la chaîne. +La pensée est extériorisée, la coordination est technicisée, la +compétence est dévolue à l'ingénieur. L'intelligence du processus est +centralisée ; l'exécution, délocalisée dans la masse. Ce phénomène est +analysé avec une acuité remarquable par Antonio Gramsci dans ses +*Quaderni del carcere*, notamment dans la section consacrée à +*Americanism and Fordism* (1934), où il décrit cette rationalisation +comme une tentative de refondation anthropologique de la société +industrielle. + +Pour Gramsci, le fordisme n'est pas seulement une méthode économique : +c'est un *projet de civilisation*, qui vise à créer un nouveau type +humain — discipliné, hygiéniste, moralement réformé, sexuellement +régulé, éthiquement productif. La fabrique devient ainsi laboratoire de +la normalisation intégrale : les gestes sont standardisés, mais aussi +les habitudes, les comportements, les corps eux-mêmes. L'ouvrier +fordiste ne doit pas seulement bien produire : il doit bien vivre — c'est-à-dire *vivre selon les normes de la production*. Il devient sujet +économique dans toutes les sphères de son existence. + +Reich souligne l'intériorisation de la soumission dans ce dispositif. +Dans *Psychologie de masse du fascisme* (1933), il place ce mécanisme au +cœur de sa critique de la subjectivation autoritaire. Selon lui, la +régulation du geste productif par la division scientifique du travail +s'accompagne d'une internalisation pulsionnelle du commandement. La +soumission n'est plus seulement imposée de l'extérieur : elle devient +incorporée et intériorisée. L'ouvrier ne travaille plus seulement pour +survivre, mais pour appartenir et se conformer. L'aliénation tend alors +à devenir adhésion. + +Ainsi, la cratialité collective opérée par le taylorisme et le fordisme +dépasse le cadre strictement économique. Elle agit comme modèle +biopolitique, dans lequel les corps, les gestes, les temporalités, les +pulsions sont réorganisés selon une logique d'efficience totale. La +production devient alors un modèle de gouvernement des vies, et la +chaîne de montage l'une des scènes privilégiées de ce pouvoir. La masse +laborieuse, orchestrée, normalisée, rationalisée, incarne un réservoir +discipliné de la puissance d'État et de l'expansion industrielle. + +La Première Guerre mondiale militarise la production et généralise la +rationalisation du travail qui devient une ressource stratégique +intégrée à une guerre d'usure. La production industrielle cesse d'être +un processus relativement autonome d'accumulation : elle devient un +opérateur logistique de la puissance étatique. L'arrière se militarise, +l'usine est intégrée au front, et le salarié tend à devenir un soldat +productif. + +Le cas britannique n'est pas isolé. En France, les usines d'armement +sont placées sous surveillance militaire, les grèves interdites, les +horaires étendus, les congés supprimés. L'État réquisitionne les corps +au même titre que les matières premières. La distinction entre +production et défense, entre économie et stratégie, s'effondre. L'effort +se militarise, et la cratialité tend à se généraliser à l'échelle de +l'appareil productif. + +Mais cette militarisation ne s'arrête pas avec l'armistice. La guerre a +produit un effet irréversible : elle a démontré que le travail peut être +commandé comme un bataillon, organisé comme une armée, régulé comme un +front. Ce que la période de 1914–1918 opère, c'est une *transformation +structurelle du travail en vecteur de puissance étatique*. +L'organisation scientifique des forces productives devient une condition +de souveraineté. Et c'est précisément sur cette base que se construira, +dans l'entre-deux-guerres, une institutionnalisation progressive de la +co-participation syndicale à la régulation productive. + +Le syndicat, traditionnellement opposé à l'autorité patronale, est +progressivement intégré à l'appareil de régulation. Le conflit tend +alors à être converti en co-gestion et l'antagonisme en négociation. Le +modèle allemand en offre l'exemple le plus net : dès les années 1920, +sous la République de Weimar, les syndicats obtiennent des sièges dans +les conseils d'entreprise (*Betriebsräte*) ; en 1920 est votée la +*Betriebsrätegesetz*, qui instaure une représentation ouvrière +obligatoire dans les entreprises de plus de 20 salariés. Ce mouvement +trouvera son plein développement après guerre, mais il est déjà en germe +dans l'entre-deux-guerres : le syndicat devient un organe de régulation +plus qu'un pur opérateur de subversion. + +Cette logique d'intégration ne suspend pas la cratialité ; elle en +approfondit l'exercice. En faisant du syndicat une interface régulatrice +entre la masse salariale et les instances de direction, le système +industriel stabilise une part de ses tensions internes. Il normalise le +conflit en l'inscrivant dans une négociation réglée. La co-gestion +devient une forme de codification du pouvoir dans l'appareil syndical. + +Aux États-Unis, la trajectoire est différente mais convergente. Le +*National Labor Relations Act* (Wagner Act, 1935) ne prévoit pas la +cogestion, mais renforce l'intégration des syndicats dans la négociation +collective. Le *collective bargaining* devient mécanisme institutionnel +de régulation des conflits, et les grandes fédérations syndicales +(notamment la CIO) participent activement à la construction du *New Deal +productif* voulu par Roosevelt. Dans les faits, les conventions +collectives deviennent des instruments de gouvernement du travail, +organisant salaires, horaires et prestations sociales dans une logique +de pacification intégrée. Là encore, le syndicat cesse d'être force +antagoniste pour devenir acteur de la stabilisation cratiale. + +Cette logique de rationalisation s'illustre de manière exemplaire dans +le cas des usines Renault sous la IIIᵉ République, notamment à partir de +1936, où la mise en place des congés payés, de la semaine de 40 heures +et des délégués ouvriers s'inscrit dans un double mouvement : +pacification sociale par intégration, et structuration étatique des +rapports de production. L'État intervient ici à la fois comme arbitre et +comme organisateur — il contraint les entreprises à réguler leur +commandement, mais confie cette régulation aux représentants syndiqués. + +Mais ce mouvement de rationalisation n'est pas sans ambiguïté. Il porte +en lui une dérive potentielle : celle d'une disciplinarisation douce, +d'une gouvernementalité consensuelle qui, sous couvert de justice +sociale, perpétue l'automatisation de la soumission. La co-participation +syndicale peut aussi devenir un instrument de canalisation du +mécontentement et de neutralisation du dissensus. En intégrant la +contestation dans le cadre, elle la désactive. En codifiant le conflit, +elle en épuise la puissance instituante. + +Dans *Psychologie de masse du fascisme* (1933), Reich suggère que +certaines formes de régulation des masses laborieuses favorisent une +intériorisation de la soumission. L'organisation devient horizon, la +régularité une valeur, la discipline un motif de fierté ; la cratialité +n'a dès lors plus besoin de forcer autant, parce qu'elle tend à être +désirée. + +Detroit, Billancourt et l'Italie fasciste donnent à voir des inflexions +distinctes de la régulation cratiale appliquée à la puissance +collective. Ces trois cas ne doivent donc pas être lus comme +déclinaisons uniformes du fordisme, mais comme trois modalités +spécifiques de la mise en scène du pouvoir régulateur sur la masse +productive. Detroit : laboratoire matriciel du fordisme archicratique -Detroit constitue le site paradigmatique de la cratialité collective industrialisée. Le complexe Ford de Highland Park, inauguré en 1910, puis celui de River Rouge (1917), cristallisent l’ensemble des dimensions de la régulation industrielle de masse : rationalisation du geste, synchronisation du travail et normalisation des corps. Le modèle est d’emblée productif et régulatoire : il configure une véritable architecture du pouvoir. +Detroit constitue le site paradigmatique de la cratialité collective +industrialisée. Le complexe Ford de Highland Park, inauguré en 1910, +puis celui de River Rouge (1917), cristallisent l'ensemble des +dimensions de la régulation industrielle de masse : rationalisation du +geste, synchronisation du travail et normalisation des corps. Le modèle +est d'emblée productif et régulatoire : il configure une véritable +architecture du pouvoir. -Comme l’a magistralement montré Antonio Gramsci dans *Americanism and Fordism* (Cahiers de prison, 1934), le fordisme n’est pas seulement une technique d’optimisation, mais une « tentative d’instaurer une nouvelle civilisation industrielle ». Il repose sur une transformation conjointe de la technique, de la subjectivité et de la morale. Le travailleur y est simultanément standardisé, surveillé, valorisé et discipliné. Il n’est plus contraint de l’extérieur : il est conformé de l’intérieur. +Comme l'a magistralement montré Antonio Gramsci dans *Americanism and +Fordism* (Cahiers de prison, 1934), le fordisme n'est pas seulement une +technique d'optimisation, mais une « tentative d'instaurer une nouvelle +civilisation industrielle ». Il repose sur une transformation conjointe +de la technique, de la subjectivité et de la morale. Le travailleur y +est simultanément standardisé, surveillé, valorisé et discipliné. Il +n'est plus contraint de l'extérieur : il est conformé de l'intérieur. -La Five Dollar Day instaurée par Ford en 1914 — doublement du salaire journalier en échange d’une soumission rigoureuse aux normes d’hygiène, de morale, de ponctualité — illustre ce pouvoir d’attraction et de codification du fordisme. Il ne s’agit pas seulement de payer pour produire ; il s’agit de *produire une manière d’être*. Ce n’est pas la contrainte mais l’incitation qui devient levier de régulation. L’archicration prend ici la forme d’une promesse sociale étroitement conditionnée par la norme productive. +La Five Dollar Day instaurée par Ford en 1914 — doublement du salaire +journalier en échange d'une soumission rigoureuse aux normes d'hygiène, +de morale, de ponctualité — illustre ce pouvoir d'attraction et de +codification du fordisme. Il ne s'agit pas seulement de payer pour +produire ; il s'agit de *produire une manière d'être*. Ce n'est pas la +contrainte mais l'incitation qui devient levier de régulation. +L'archicration prend ici la forme d'une promesse sociale étroitement +conditionnée par la norme productive. -Le pouvoir fordiste atteint sa perfection régulatoire dans l’organisation de la *supply chain* : les matières premières entrent d’un côté de l’usine, les voitures sortent de l’autre, sans rupture de flux, dans une continuité spatiotemporelle parfaite. Le travailleur est intégré comme une pièce de la machine, mais aussi comme le destinataire d’un contrat implicite liant rémunération et acceptation de la régulation. C’est la naissance d’une archicration contractuelle d’entreprise — l’usine tend à devenir à la fois monde de vie, cadre normatif et foyer de socialisation. +Le pouvoir fordiste atteint sa perfection régulatoire dans +l'organisation de la *supply chain* : les matières premières entrent +d'un côté de l'usine, les voitures sortent de l'autre, sans rupture de +flux, dans une continuité spatiotemporelle parfaite. Le travailleur est +intégré comme une pièce de la machine, mais aussi comme le destinataire +d'un contrat implicite liant rémunération et acceptation de la +régulation. C'est la naissance d'une archicration contractuelle +d'entreprise — l'usine tend à devenir à la fois monde de vie, cadre +normatif et foyer de socialisation. Renault : fordisme républicain et tension régulatoire -À Billancourt, l’adoption du modèle fordiste s’effectue dans un contexte politique et social profondément différent. Le régime républicain, le rôle actif des syndicats et la mémoire des luttes sociales modifient profondément la nature de cette régulation collective. - -Dans l’entre-deux-guerres, les usines Renault développent des chaînes inspirées de Ford, mais sans jamais atteindre la même fluidité, ni la même intensité prescriptive. Le fordisme y est tempéré par la conflictualité sociale, par l’intervention étatique, par les institutions du Front populaire. En 1936, les accords de Matignon instaurent les congés payés, la semaine de 40 heures, les délégués d’atelier : autant de dispositifs qui encadrent la puissance patronale, sans pour autant abolir la logique cratiale. - -L’archicration y prend la forme d’une scène négociée. Elle se déploie sur un mode dialectique, entre impulsions productivistes et résistances collectives. Le pouvoir ne s’y exerce pas unilatéralement : il est contraint de se formuler, de se justifier, de s’institutionnaliser. Cette tension structurelle confère à Renault un statut particulier : celui d’un espace de régulation mixte, où coexistent codification disciplinaire et conflictualité instituante. Il s’agit d’une configuration archicratique tendue, jamais pleinement stabilisée. - -Italie fasciste : nationalisation totalitaire de la cratialité collective - -Le cas italien marque, lui, un basculement radical. Avec le fascisme mussolinien, la cratialité collective se voit absorbée dans un processus de totalisation politique : la force de travail n’est plus seulement organisée, elle est *incorporée* à l’État. L’économie est nationalisée dans l’imaginaire de guerre, le travail élevé au rang de dévotion civique, et l’ouvrier redéfini comme soldat de la patrie. - -L’*Opera Nazionale Dopolavoro*, créée en 1925, incarne cette régulation intégrale de la vie ouvrière : contrôle du temps libre, encadrement culturel, organisation de la sociabilité. Le syndicat est aboli en tant qu’organe de lutte — il est refondu en *corporation*, intégré à l’État, privé d’autonomie. La production cesse d’être un champ d’opposition : elle est sacralisée comme fonction nationale. Cette fusion entre pouvoir politique, commandement économique et normativité morale produit une archicration fasciste, c’est-à-dire une régulation totalisante où toute résistance est assimilée à une trahison. - -Gramsci, là encore, l’avait vu : dans sa lecture du fordisme, il montre que ce dernier peut être *progressiste* dans une société démocratique, mais *réactionnaire* dans un cadre autoritaire. Le point décisif est ici que l’archicration n’a pas, en elle-même, de contenu moral propre. Elle demeure un opérateur formel, modulable selon les régimes de légitimité et les structures de pouvoir. Le cas italien en illustre la pente la plus sombre : l’annihilation de la conflictualité par la sacralisation de l’unité. - -L’analyse de la cratialité collective dans la seconde révolution industrielle fait apparaître moins l’uniformité d’un modèle productiviste que la diversité des formes de subjectivation encadrées sous régime industriel : le pouvoir n’agit plus seulement sur des corps, il orchestre des masses. Ce passage du disciplinaire au collectif régulé constitue une rupture de phase du processus archicratique. La contrainte ne disparaît pas : elle se transforme, se diffuse et s’intériorise à travers les matrices de synchronisation et de rationalisation du travail. - -Avec le taylorisme puis le fordisme, la force devient fonction : la puissance humaine est convertie en séquence opératoire calibrée par une norme d’efficience extérieure à elle. Le travailleur n’est plus sujet de son geste, mais agent d’une chaîne dont il épouse le rythme, le protocole, l’économie symbolique. On peut y reconnaître, dans un lexique foucaldien, une forme de gouvernementalité par ajustement — où le contrôle n’opère plus par surveillance frontale mais par *encadrement des marges*, par *canalisation du possible*. La force collective est capturée par la logique du flux. - -La spécificité de cette époque tient aussi à ceci : la rationalisation productive s’accompagne d’une institutionnalisation régulée de la conflictualité. Le syndicat, loin d’être simplement réprimé ou marginalisé, est en de nombreux cas intégré à la scène régulatoire. Il devient partie prenante du compromis cratial. Co-gestionnaire dans les modèles allemands, négociateur des conventions dans les modèles américains, acteur du compromis républicain en France, le syndicat opère comme opérateur de régulation contrôlée du conflit — c’est-à-dire comme mécanisme d’inscription du dissensus dans un cadre négocié. Cette inclusion paradoxale de l’opposition dans l’architecture du pouvoir constitue l’un des traits majeurs de la cratialité moderne. - -À l’inverse, lorsque cette conflictualité est niée — comme dans le modèle corporatiste fasciste —, le pouvoir cratial se retourne contre lui-même : il cesse de réguler pour imposer. Il ne modèle plus les conduites ; il les remplace par des rituels d’allégeance. C’est ici que l’on saisit, dans sa netteté la plus tranchante, le basculement entre cratialité encadrante et cratialité totalisante : lorsque la force collective n’est plus modulée mais fétichisée, lorsqu’elle n’est plus négociée mais sacralisée, elle cesse d’être opératoire — elle devient *objet de culte*. C’est le moment où l’archicration se dissout dans l’idéologie. - -Le siècle fordiste ne se limite pas à une montée en puissance de la rationalité économique. Il correspond à un moment où le pouvoir s’exerce de plus en plus à l’échelle des collectifs de travail, à travers l’organisation des masses, la structuration des rythmes productifs et l’encadrement des conduites. Le pouvoir n’administre plus des individus isolés : il orchestre des subjectivations synchronisées. Et c’est cette *composition d’ensemble* — au croisement de l’économie, de la technique, du droit et du psychopolitique — que nous devons reconnaître comme un régime spécifique de cratialité collective. - -Cette cratialité n’existe toutefois jamais à l’état pur. Toujours prise dans des tensions et des bifurcations, elle n’accède à la régulation instituée qu’à travers un cadre, un code et une scène : c’est à ce point qu’elle rejoint l’archicration. L’histoire de la régulation industrielle apparaît alors moins comme une montée linéaire du contrôle que comme une série de compositions instables entre force et forme, entre masse et ordre, entre élan vital et cadence mécanique. - -La prochaine section prolongera cette exploration en montrant que la puissance collective, une fois capturée, peut être orientée aussi bien vers la stabilisation démocratique que vers l’éradication totalitaire. Nous basculerons alors d’une cratialité de synchronisation à une archicration de modélisation systémique. - -### **4.3.3 – Archicration institutionnelle négociée : contrat social fordiste, assurance, bureaucratie stabilisante** - -La première moitié du XXe siècle marque une mutation de la scène même de la régulation. Là où la cratialité industrielle avait constitué la force en masse mobilisable et où l’arcalité infrastructurelle avait instauré les conditions de la gouvernabilité matérielle du réel, s’institue désormais une scène de négociation, c’est-à-dire une forme contractuelle d’encadrement des forces productives. C’est le moment où émerge une archicration institutionnelle : une régulation appuyée sur la médiation formelle, le compromis codifié et la structuration légitime des rapports sociaux. - -À la coercition unilatérale des débuts de l’ère industrielle succède une tentative de composition du pouvoir régulateur, appuyée sur la consolidation d’un compromis historique entre capital, travail et État. Le pacte fordiste, dans ses variantes nord-américaines, européennes et scandinaves, n’est pas seulement une transformation des modes de gestion. Il marque une inflexion profonde dans la logique même de l’archicration. Elle passe désormais par la norme, s’articule à des cadres juridiques, se négocie dans des instances représentatives et se matérialise dans des institutions de redistribution et de sécurisation collective. - -Dans ce mouvement, le droit du travail, en pleine expansion dès l’entre-deux-guerres, joue un rôle décisif de régulation différée : il permet d’absorber les conflits sociaux dans une grammaire contractuelle stabilisée, juridiquement opposable et fortement codifiée. La jurisprudence participe ici à un dispositif de pacification. Norme salariale, conventions collectives, fixation légale du temps de travail, encadrement des licenciements, mécanismes d’arbitrage : autant d’instruments d’une régulation fondée sur la délibération encadrée, autrement dit sur l’institutionnalisation de la controverse. - -Le trait décisif de cette phase est le suivant : l’archicration ne s’impose plus par la brutalité de la forme, ni par la matérialité de l’infrastructure ; elle se tisse dans les protocoles, les accords, les corps intermédiaires et les institutions collectives. Elle prend la forme de ce que Norbert Elias nommait une configuration : une interdépendance organisée, dans laquelle chaque acteur module sa force en fonction de celle des autres, sous contrainte réciproque. - -Mais cette négociation n’est jamais libre ; elle est déjà structurée archicratiquement. Et ce cadre, c’est celui d’un État rationalisé, désormais en position de garant des compromis productifs et sociaux. L’État cesse d’être un simple arbitre pour devenir un agent actif de la régulation, à travers la production de normes, la redistribution des richesses, l’institutionnalisation de droits, la gestion des flux sociaux. Il devient l’organisateur du compromis régulateur. - -C’est dans le paradigme fordiste que l’archicration institutionnelle atteint sa formulation la plus cohérente et la plus stabilisée. Frederick Winslow Taylor, en posant les fondements d’une *gestion scientifique du travail* (The Principles of Scientific Management, 1911), avait déjà introduit une *cratialité calculée*, fondée sur la sélection, la mesure, l’optimisation des gestes. Mais c’est Henry Ford qui transforme ce rationalisme gestionnaire en architecture régulatoire globale. Le passage du taylorisme au fordisme n’est pas une simple évolution technique : il constitue une reconfiguration archicratique. À partir de 1913, dans l’usine de Highland Park à Detroit, s’installe une configuration où la régulation du geste productif, du temps de travail, du salaire et du mode de vie s’agence en un dispositif unifié de normalisation existentielle. - -En fixant un salaire journalier de 5 dollars, Ford ne cherche pas à “récompenser” la force de travail, mais à l’indexer sur la reproduction d’un mode de vie compatible avec l’accumulation capitalistique. Le salaire devient un levier de stabilisation sociale, un outil d’intériorisation des rythmes de production et un moyen d’attacher le travailleur à l’ordre productif. Le salaire cesse ainsi d’être un simple échange marchand pour devenir un opérateur de régulation des conduites. Il aligne le désir individuel sur l’intérêt systémique. Il transforme le travailleur en consommateur solvable, et le consommateur en agent de reproduction du système. - -Le fordisme est à la fois un mode de production et une manière d’ordonner les temporalités de la vie : travail stable, salaire fixe, crédit encadré, consommation normée, sécurité prévisible, accès progressif à la propriété. Il impose des trajectoires de vie relativement typées, des biographies régulées, des attentes standardisées. On peut lire ce dispositif, à la manière de Foucault, comme une forme de gouvernementalité salariale, dans laquelle les trajectoires de vie sont organisées selon des matrices de prévisibilité : entrée dans la vie active, constitution du foyer, achat de biens durables, intégration institutionnelle, retraite garantie. La normalité devient l’objet de parcours. - -Le fordisme aligne étroitement production, consommation et régulation sociale. Là où le taylorisme organisait les gestes, il étend la rationalisation aux désirs, aux habitudes et aux projections de vie. Il ne se contente pas de fabriquer des voitures : il fabrique des modes de vie, des habitudes, des attentes. Le modèle suburbain états-unien, avec ses lotissements, ses banlieues résidentielles, ses crédits à taux préférentiels, ses supermarchés, ses assurances, ses routines, est la forme la plus achevée de cette archicration par le salariat. - -Mais cette stabilisation n’est possible que parce qu’elle s’appuie sur un État co-producteur de la sécurité sociale. Le New Deal aux États-Unis (1933–1939), les lois sociales du Front populaire en France (1936), le Beveridge Report au Royaume-Uni (1942), constituent autant de moments où les compromis salariaux sont repris et garantis par la puissance publique. L’État devient garant de la stabilité de la reproduction sociale : assurance chômage, protection contre les accidents du travail, retraite, médecine du travail, encadrement du crédit. L’archicration se territorialise dans les institutions publiques. Elle ne gouverne plus par décret autoritaire, mais par lissage prévisionnel des risques, par calcul probabiliste des trajectoires, par encadrement protecteur des discontinuités. - -Cette forme de régulation fait émerger une figure historique spécifique du sujet politique et social : le citoyen-salarié, à la fois producteur, assuré, contribuable, électeur. Ce sujet est encadré non par la terreur ni par la propagande, mais par la norme ; non par la répression, mais par la prévisibilité. Il vit dans une économie d’existence codifiée, dans laquelle l’instabilité est à la fois neutralisée par l’assurance et valorisée par la performance. - -Le fordisme n’est donc pas une simple technique économique : il configure une manière historique d’organiser l’existence sociale. Il propose une manière d’exister dans un monde industriel : une manière de travailler, de consommer, de se projeter, de se stabiliser. Il est l’expression achevée d’une archicration de la sécurité — non plus comme exception ou privilège, mais comme norme distribuée, comme horizon de toutes les classes intégrées. - -Dans la période 1870–1945, l’État devient une composante centrale de la régulation sociale — non plus par la législation autoritaire, mais par la construction d’un *environnement de stabilisation* des conflits sociaux, économiques et existentiels. C’est à cette époque que se met en place une archicration articulée à l’État et au salariat, c’est-à-dire un mode de régulation dans lequel l’État intervient à la fois comme garant, comme co-producteur et comme cartographe du compromis. - -La montée de la conflictualité ouvrière (grèves massives, syndicalisme offensif, radicalisation des luttes) ne donne pas lieu à une simple répression ou à une restauration disciplinaire. Elle est au contraire captée, encadrée et institutionnalisée — selon une logique de co-optation des revendications par les dispositifs mêmes de l’État moderne. Dès la fin du XIXe siècle, dans l’Allemagne bismarckienne, s’amorce ce que Pierre Rosanvallon analysera plus tard comme un processus de “politisation de la question sociale” (*La crise de l’État-providence*, 1981) : assurances sociales (1883), accidents du travail (1884), retraites (1889). Il s’agit d’abord d’une stratégie régulatoire, non d’un geste humaniste. Le travailleur intégré est plus docile, plus prévisible, plus gouvernable. - -C’est ici que la sécurité sociale apparaît comme une technique d’anticipation des risques. En garantissant des formes de protection contre les aléas de la vie (maladie, vieillesse, chômage), l’État crée un régime d’adhésion implicite : chacun est intégré à une société de calculs actuariels où le risque est à la fois pris en charge et redistribué. L’assurance devient mode de gouvernement. Comme l’écrit Michel Foucault dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), la gestion des risques n’est plus une externalité : elle devient un *vecteur de gouvernementalité*. Et cette gouvernementalité ne s’exerce pas par la norme morale, mais par l’architecture d’un horizon calculable — dans lequel chacun devient responsable, mais dans les bornes d’un système d’incitation. - -L’État assure, mais il planifie aussi. Le cas du *Commissariat général du Plan* en France (créé en 1946, mais pensé dès la guerre), ou celui du *Gosplan* soviétique dès 1921, témoigne de la montée d’un État stratège, qui n’improvise plus, mais modélise. La régulation devient anticipatrice : quotas, projections, scénarios, indicateurs. L’économie cesse d’être laissée à l’équilibre spontané — elle est encadrée par des matrices de prévision. Cette planification, qu’elle soit centralisée (URSS), indicative (France) ou sectorielle (New Deal américain), marque une rupture épistémologique : le futur devient gouvernable. - -Mais cette projection du futur repose sur un travail de mise en compatibilité des intérêts. L’État devient *médiateur technique des antagonismes sociaux*. Il ne supprime pas les conflits, il les reformule. Il les traduit en variables, en courbes, en objectifs, en compromis. Le conflit ne se joue plus dans la rue — il se déplace dans les commissions, les tables de négociation, les conventions collectives. La loi du 23 avril 1919 en France (instaurant la journée de 8 heures) n’est pas un acte révolutionnaire : elle est le produit d’un compromis régulatoire, visant à stabiliser la productivité post-guerre tout en intégrant les revendications ouvrières. - -S’installe alors une régulation par la formalisation : tableaux, normes, grilles, droits et seuils. Et cette gouvernance est opérée par une bureaucratie stabilisatrice, dont Max Weber avait bien saisi la dynamique : rationalisation légale-formelle, spécialisation des tâches, neutralité procédurale. Mais cette neutralité est une illusion : la bureaucratie régule les effets d’instabilité systémiques, tout en invisibilisant leur origine politique. Elle est un amortisseur symbolique. - -Dans ce contexte, le compromis social devient une technique de gouvernement. Il ne s’agit plus de trancher, mais de lisser. Plus de commander, mais d’inciter. Plus de réprimer, mais de pré-allouer. C’est l’ère des conventions collectives, des partenaires sociaux, des comités mixtes, des tables rondes. L’État n’est plus souverain au sens classique : il est *modulateur des flux et des déséquilibres*. Il devient, pour reprendre l’expression d’Alain Supiot, un État justificateur, qui se donne pour fonction non de commander, mais de garantir la cohérence narrative des régulations. - -Ce compromis social d’État s’accompagne enfin d’un pacte implicite de croissance et de discipline. Les syndicats, intégrés dans la gouvernance des dispositifs, acceptent de contenir les revendications en échange d’une redistribution partielle de la richesse. C’est l’essence du fordisme politique : la paix sociale contre la consommation garantie ; la docilité collective contre la stabilité prévisionnelle. Ce n’est pas la fin du conflit — c’est son déplacement dans un théâtre régulé. - -L’archicration institutionnelle négociée ne supprime pas les tensions : elle en organise la gestion sélective, en redistribue les seuils d’acceptabilité, et surtout en désactive les foyers de conflictualité non compatibles avec l’ordre calculé. Ce n’est pas une pacification, c’est une *mise en forme* des tensions — dont l’effet structurel est de normaliser la conflictualité acceptable tout en reléguant dans l’indicible, l’invisible ou l’illégitime, toutes les formes de dissensus inassimilables. - -Le paradoxe tient à ce que la reconnaissance étatique des revendications collectives — à travers la sécurité sociale, les conventions collectives et les négociations paritaires — fonctionne comme opérateur de neutralisation politique. Là où une lutte pouvait être vécue comme insurrectionnelle ou radicalement antagoniste (grèves sauvages, occupations, refus du travail), elle est reconfigurée en différend technique, traité dans un dialogue d’experts, de représentants et d’instances. L’État ne se contente pas de pacifier : il dépolitise une part du conflit en le traduisant en paramètres d’ajustement. - -Ce processus a été magistralement analysé par Jacques Rancière dans *La mésentente* (1995), lorsqu’il distingue le politique du policier. Pour Rancière, le politique est la manifestation d’un tort, d’une part non reconnue, d’un surgissement de l’incompté ; tandis que le policier est le régime de la répartition des places et des fonctions — c’est-à-dire la distribution normative de ce qui peut être vu, dit, entendu. Dans notre cadre, la régulation archicratique étatique devient un policement de l’espace politique : elle absorbe les voix dissonantes dans une architecture où seul le compatible peut être pris en charge. - -Mais cette absorption implique nécessairement l’exclusion de ce qui ne peut pas être traduit dans les termes du compromis. Se trouvent ainsi neutralisées toutes les formes de subjectivation politique qui échappent à la mise en équation des intérêts : les *sans-parts* (Rancière), les *surnuméraires* (Castel), les *non-alignés productifs*. La régulation devient exclusive non par coercition directe, mais par *inintelligibilité structurelle*. Si vous ne pouvez être assigné à une fonction, une classe, un statut, un régime de protection, vous êtes expulsé du régime de régulation. Ce qui fait défaut n’est pas toujours le droit lui-même, mais la possibilité pour le sujet d’être reconnu dans les cadres de la régulation. - -Cette invisibilisation du dissensus est d’autant plus efficace qu’elle s’opère sous des formes apparemment inclusives. Le progrès des droits sociaux, la généralisation de l’assurance, l’universalisation des protections sont perçus comme des victoires historiques (et ils le sont, dans une certaine mesure). Mais ils opèrent aussi comme filtres de légitimation, selon lesquels seules les demandes articulées dans les catégories du compromis sont recevables. Tout ce qui relève de la transformation structurelle du régime même de régulation — critique radicale du travail, du salariat, de la croissance, de l’institutionnalisation — est déplacé hors du périmètre des “revendications légitimes”. - -Ce mécanisme est puissamment actif dans la période 1920–1940, au moment où les institutions de régulation se durcissent sous l’effet conjugué de la montée des totalitarismes et de la crise du capitalisme libéral. Le New Deal américain, par exemple, constitue une puissante machine de réencodage des conflits : il crée la *Social Security Act* (1935), la *Wagner Act* (1935) sur les conventions collectives, le *Civilian Conservation Corps* — mais aussi une architecture d’intégration surveillée, où les syndicats deviennent co-gestionnaires de la discipline sociale. Le dissensus radical (syndicalisme révolutionnaire, anarcho-syndicalisme, communisme de base) est marginalisé, persécuté, dissous dans la modération contractuelle. - -La France de la Troisième République n’est pas en reste. Le Front populaire (1936), tout en concédant congés payés et semaine de 40 heures, opère un retournement stratégique : il neutralise le potentiel insurrectionnel de la grève générale en la traduisant en gains mesurables. Le mot d’ordre devient alors la stabilisation plutôt que la transformation. Même les avant-gardes critiques (par exemple, les groupes surréalistes politisés autour de Georges Bataille ou les syndicalistes de la CGT-U) se heurtent à une clôture du possible : la régulation absorbe tout — sauf ce qui conteste le cadre même de la régulation. - -Enfin, cette invisibilisation du dissensus s’accompagne d’une normalisation des subjectivités. L’individu intégré dans la régulation devient un porteur de droits, mais aussi un agent de reproduction du régime régulateur. Le salarié assuré, syndiqué et planifié est aussi un individu canalisé dans ses conduites : son corps est réglé par les rythmes du travail, ses risques intégrés dans les calculs actuariels, ses aspirations orientées vers la carrière, la consommation et la retraite. - -### **4.3.4 – Archicration exterminatrice : machinerie totalitaire, industrialisation de la destruction** - -Pour saisir la dimension thanatopolitique du phénomène archicratique, il faut partir de ce que Zygmunt Bauman a nommé, dans *Modernité et Holocauste* (1989), le paradoxe d’Auschwitz. Ce paradoxe ne tient pas uniquement au fait qu’un génocide ait été perpétré au cœur de l’Europe moderne, mais au fait qu’il procède non d’un effondrement de la rationalité moderne, mais de son application méthodique, bureaucratique, procédurale et technique. Il ne s’est pas produit en rupture avec la civilisation rationnelle occidentale, mais en son sein, selon sa logique et à l’aide de ses instruments administratifs et techniques. - -Auschwitz ne peut être réduit à un dérapage : il constitue un point-limite d’une certaine forme de rationalisation régulatrice. La logistique des convois, la standardisation des wagons à bestiaux, la codification des “quotas” de déportés par région, la gestion “optimisée” des corps — vivants, puis morts — tout cela procède d’une machine régulatrice parfaitement articulée, froide, impersonnelle et dépourvue de pathos. C’est l’administration devenue moyen de mort. Bauman montre que la division du travail, la hiérarchisation des responsabilités, la séparation des tâches (convoi, tri, exécution, crémation) ont permis l’extinction de toute conflictualité morale individuelle. Le crime était fragmenté et protocolisé. La conscience individuelle pouvait s’effacer dans la fonction. - -Le point névralgique est le suivant : l’archicration devient destructrice lorsque la régulation se déconnecte du jugement éthique au profit du protocole efficient. Ce n’est pas d’abord l’arbitraire du tyran qui tue, mais la conformité au plan et l’exécution du protocole. Le commandement n’ordonne plus directement le meurtre : il définit des procédures, des critères de rendement et des indicateurs d’efficacité. Ce que Hannah Arendt avait entrevu dans son analyse de la “banalité du mal” (*Eichmann à Jérusalem*, 1963) trouve ici un complément structurel : la régulation peut devenir mortifère non par défaut d’intelligence, mais par excès d’organisation. - -Or, ce modèle n’est pas spécifique au régime nazi. Il incarne une forme extrême, mais structurellement possible, de toute logique archicratique qui se pense hors scène, c’est-à-dire hors espace de conflictualité, d’énonciation, de subjectivation critique. Lorsque la régulation se réduit à une performance de gestion, que le chiffre supplante la parole, que le plan remplace la loi et que la mesure évacue la mémoire, alors la mort peut devenir un segment rationnel du système. Ce n’est pas une simple dérive, mais une bifurcation interne. - -Le cas d’Auschwitz-Birkenau, et plus encore celui du complexe IG Farben/Auschwitz III (Monowitz), en constitue l’expression la plus nette. IG Farben, cartel industriel de la chimie allemande, y déploie une chaîne de production de caoutchouc synthétique (Buna), alimentée par une main-d’œuvre esclavagisée extraite du camp voisin. Les ingénieurs organisent les rythmes de travail, calculent les seuils de productivité et intègrent des taux de déperdition “admissibles” (sous-nutrition, maladies, décès). La rationalisation industrielle et la mise à mort deviennent strictement indissociables. - -L’archicration exterminatrice désigne ainsi un pouvoir régulateur qui, en poursuivant sa propre logique d’efficience, devient capable d’intégrer la destruction dans le plan. Il ne s’agit plus d’exercer la domination par la force (kratos nu) ou par la loi (arkhè instituée), mais par l’inscription de la disparition dans la trame même de la régulation. Ce n’est plus la loi qui décide de qui doit vivre ou mourir. C’est la planification procédurale de l’exécution, dans un espace de rationalité opaque, post-juridique et post-morale. - -Ce qui distingue la Shoah dans l’histoire des régimes exterminateurs, ce n’est pas seulement son ampleur ni même sa systématicité : c’est la manière dont elle fut conduite comme une entreprise logistique, un processus d’optimisation et un enchaînement de procédures dans un monde bureaucratiquement structuré. Dans cette configuration, la disparition des personnes ne fut pas pensée comme un acte de guerre ou une vengeance idéologique ponctuelle, mais comme un flux à gérer, un problème à résoudre, un stock à écouler. Se met ainsi en place ce que nous nommons ici une archicration exterminatrice par logistique — c’est-à-dire l’intégration de l’éradication dans les structures opératoires du pouvoir régulateur. - -Comme l’a démontré Raul Hilberg dans *La destruction des Juifs d’Europe* (1961), l’extermination nazie ne fut pas improvisée dans un élan de fanatisme : elle fut l’objet d’une construction administrative progressive, passant par des étapes précises — discrimination, expulsion, concentration, déportation, élimination —, toutes traitées comme des problèmes logistiques soumis à résolution technique. Les ministères impliqués (Intérieur, Transports, Économie) ne pensaient pas “extermination” mais “déplacement”, “affectation”, “réallocation”. Le langage lui-même fut administré. Le mot *Endlösung* — “solution finale” — n’indique pas un moment de rupture, mais l’acmé d’un processus de rationalisation. - -Chaque convoi était planifié avec une exactitude métronomique : date de départ, nombre de wagons, densité de chargement, délai d’acheminement et coordination avec les horaires des trains de fret et de passagers. La Banque de données du Reichsbahn traitait les juifs comme une catégorie de fret parmi d’autres. Le chef du département de transport du RSHA, Adolf Eichmann, se comportait comme un fonctionnaire soucieux d’efficacité : les vies humaines avaient été réduites à des unités logistiques à déplacer à coût minimal. - -L’extinction des subjectivités précède ici la mort biologique : elle s’opère dès que l’individu devient une variable d’un plan, dès que son existence est reconfigurée comme “cas” dans une grille d’élimination. C’est ici que la régulation atteint une fonction létale. Non pas en ordonnant la mort, mais en intégrant l’effacement dans une chaîne opératoire de décisions anonymisées. - -Dans cette rationalité logistique, il n’y a plus d’ennemi politique, plus de visage à haïr, plus de “barbare” à soumettre. Il n’y a qu’un problème démographique à résoudre, une anomalie statistique à corriger, une charge à évacuer. La *Zählbarkeit* — la “comptabilité” — devient la forme de la souveraineté négative. Ce que l’on ne peut intégrer au plan (les Juifs, les Tsiganes, les homosexuels, les handicapés, les résistants) doit être supprimé non pas en tant qu’adversaire, mais en tant qu’élément incompatible avec le système. - -Le convoi, dans cette perspective, devient l’unité matérielle de la régulation exterminatrice. Il articule transport, temporalité, destination et mise à mort dans une même chaîne opératoire. Il devient l’instrument mobile de la disparition et de la désubjectivation. Les camps d’extermination — Sobibor, Treblinka, Auschwitz — ne sont pas des lieux exceptionnels : ils sont des points terminaux d’une logistique d’État, des hubs de traitement final, des nœuds du réseau archicratique mortifère. - -Il est essentiel de comprendre que cette archicration exterminatrice ne s’oppose pas à la modernité régulatrice : elle l’accomplit en creux. C’est la démonstration ultime que toute régulation déconnectée de la scène réflexive, de la conflictualité politique, de la normativité vivante, peut devenir instrument de mort par excès d’efficience. Ce n’est plus d’abord l’arbitraire du tyran ni la violence du soldat, mais la planification administrative, le calcul et la froideur des dispositifs. - -C’est ce basculement que notre thèse doit rendre visible dans toute son horreur rationnelle. L’archicration, si elle n’est pas inscrite dans une scène critique, dans une conflictualité des finalités, dans un horizon de sens partagé, peut devenir la forme la plus létale du pouvoir moderne — précisément parce qu’elle n’en a pas l’apparence. - -La planification soviétique, loin d’être un simple mécanisme économique d’organisation de la production dans un cadre socialiste, incarne une forme radicale et totalisante de régulation archicratique : le projet d’un monde intégralement piloté, modélisé et rationalisé selon une ingénierie des flux humains, matériels et symboliques. Le *Gosudarstvennyi Planovyi Komitet* — Gosplan — établi dès 1921, devient rapidement le cœur névralgique d’un pouvoir qui ne se contente plus de gouverner : il fabrique la réalité en la codant par le plan. L’archicration y prend alors une forme extrême : celle de la modélisation performative de l’existence. - -À la différence des régulations dispersées du XIXe siècle ou même des architectures standards du fordisme, la planification soviétique ne tolère aucune extériorité. Elle constitue une forme de souveraineté totale non plus par la contrainte frontale, mais par la préemption de l’avenir. Le plan quinquennal — *piatiletka* — ne propose pas une orientation : il impose une réalité anticipée, qu’il faut réaliser coûte que coûte. L’économie cesse alors d’être un domaine d’échange ou de production pour devenir le théâtre d’une régulation intégrale, intégrée, inscrite dans tous les segments du vivant et du social. - -Cette archicration planificatrice repose sur trois dimensions étroitement liées : modélisation mathématique, contrôle bureaucratique, extermination différentielle. La réalité n’est plus l’objet d’un traitement politique, mais le produit d’une modélisation normative : statistiques de rendement, tableaux de productivité, quotas d’extraction, courbes de croissance, matrices de circulation. Le réel doit correspondre au plan — et non l’inverse. Tout écart devient suspect ; toute anomalie doit être éliminée ; tout débordement est interprété comme erreur du système ou sabotage conscient. L’anéantissement de classe naît ici d’un excès de régulation. - -Ce n’est pas un hasard si les grandes purges staliniennes — notamment entre 1936 et 1938 — ciblent avant tout les ingénieurs, les directeurs d’usine, les économistes, les planificateurs : la guerre de classe devient une guerre contre les écarts statistiques. Le *koulak*, le “sabot” du plan, n’est plus simplement un opposant politique, mais une résistance au régime de visibilité du plan lui-même. Comme l’a perçu Michel Foucault dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), la rationalité gouvernante peut basculer dans un *hyper-pouvoir de pilotage* — non plus par la loi ou la morale, mais par l’anticipation et la capture des comportements. Le plan soviétique apparaît ainsi comme une forme de captation prédatrice du futur. - -Ainsi, les déportations massives vers le Goulag ne relèvent pas d’une politique d’exception : elles sont intégrées dans la logique du plan. Le camp devient une unité productive, le prisonnier une force de travail calibrée et le convoi une variable d’ajustement. Le camp n’est pas un simple espace de relégation : il devient un instrument d’ajustement interne du plan, le lieu où l’écart est réabsorbé dans l’économie du projet. Comme l’a démontré Moshe Lewin dans *Le Siècle soviétique* (2003), le système stalinien ne tolère aucune contradiction externe — il les internalise comme moments nécessaires de son perfectionnement normatif. - -C’est pourquoi l’on peut affirmer que le *Gosplan* est le paradigme d’une archicration à fonction totalitaire : non pas par excès d’autorité visible, mais par hypertrophie de la rationalité régulatrice. Il ne commande pas seulement : il modélise, encode et planifie l’élimination comme fonction du calibrage du système. Il se présente non comme pouvoir de domination, mais comme agent de vérité prévisible. Il fonctionne comme une machine de projection normative, produisant de l’obligation, configurant le réel et générant de la violence par mise en conformité. - -Dans ce contexte, l’idéologie marxiste-léniniste devient le langage opératoire de la régulation : le discours de la nécessité historique remplace la scène du débat, la dialectique se rigidifie en protocole et la lutte des classes se transforme en mécanisme d’ajustement social. Le pouvoir soviétique, au sommet de cette rationalisation, ne se pense plus comme contingent ni conflictuel : il se pense comme régulation structurelle du devenir collectif, comme instance qui garantit que l’histoire se déroule comme prévu. - -La mort n’y survient donc pas comme accident ou tragédie : elle devient une variable intégrée. Il ne s’agit pas seulement d’une volonté de tuer, mais d’une rationalité qui transforme l’élimination de ce qui ne correspond pas aux prévisions en nécessité systémique. Dans cette architecture régulatrice, l’extermination de classe est l’effet logique du plan — non pas sa trahison. - -Il faut alors l’affirmer clairement : la régulation, si elle n’est pas adossée à une scène délibérative, à une conflictualité politique assumée, à une réflexivité publique, peut devenir le plus létal des pouvoirs. Non pas par abus de violence, mais par trop-plein de norme. C’est la leçon majeure du plan soviétique : qu’un monde régulé jusqu’à la racine peut devenir un monde invivable — non pas en dépit du plan, mais à cause de lui. - -Il ne s’agit plus ici d’une violence exceptionnelle ou contingente, mais d’une forme de régulation portée à son point de paroxysme, où la destruction des corps humains devient *une fonction intégrée au système productif*. Ce sont des cas où l’archicration moderne — censée produire l’ordre, l’efficience, la stabilité — bascule dans une logique d’extermination programmée, organisée, planifiée, sans jamais cesser d’être normative, bureaucratique, régulatrice. Auschwitz, l’Oural soviétique et la guerre fasciste constituent trois figures majeures de ce point-limite de la régulation totale, où le vivant n’est plus un sujet à gouverner mais un stock à gérer, un obstacle à éliminer, un *surplus à administrer*. - -Le complexe Auschwitz-Buna-Monowitz en constitue une matrice paroxystique. Ce n’est pas un hasard si ce camp de concentration, situé à proximité d’Auschwitz III, fut intégré dans l’orbite industrielle du géant IG Farben, pour y produire du caoutchouc synthétique (*Buna*). Ici, le travail forcé et l’extermination ne sont pas dissociés, mais techniquement intriqués. Le camp fonctionne selon des objectifs de rendement, de sélection, de coût-bénéfice. Comme le montre Zygmunt Bauman (*Modernité et Holocauste*, 1989), ce qui se joue à Auschwitz-Buna n’est pas un déchaînement pulsionnel, mais l’articulation fonctionnelle entre rationalité industrielle et projet génocidaire. La chaîne de mort est une chaîne de production. L’espace est planifié, le temps optimisé, la main-d’œuvre sélectionnée selon ses capacités, et les “inutiles” éliminés à l’entrée. La régulation devient triage, et le triage devient meurtre. - -La machinerie de l’extermination — logistique, administrative, technique — y est perfectionnée à l’échelle de l’organisation scientifique du travail. Raul Hilberg (*La destruction des Juifs d’Europe*, 1961) montre que cette extermination fut orchestrée à travers une multitude de micro-décisions, de fichiers, de transports, de procédures, d’accords inter-agences. Le convoi n°53 du 26 mars 1943, par exemple, emportant 1 003 Juifs vers Sobibor, résulte d’une convergence de décisions entre la Reichsbahn (chemin de fer), la SS, les polices locales, et le ministère des Transports. Il ne s’agit donc pas de chaos administratif, mais d’un régime de régulation interopérable, convergent, inter-institutionnel, orienté vers la destruction. - -Cette régulation exterminatrice n’est pas l’exclusivité du régime nazi. Elle trouve un autre modèle, tout aussi terrifiant, dans les politiques de déplacement industriel et de guerre menées en Union soviétique, notamment durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Dès 1941, face à l’invasion allemande, plus de 1 500 usines sont déplacées vers l’Oural et la Sibérie, impliquant des millions de travailleurs contraints, souvent prisonniers ou déportés politiques, intégrés dans un système productif de guerre. Ces « villes nouvelles », telles que Magnitogorsk ou Sverdlovsk, ne sont pas des centres urbains mais des matrices régulatoires intégrées, où la vie humaine est calibrée selon la productivité. Comme l’analyse Stephen Kotkin dans *Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization* (1995), ces cités ne visent pas l’autonomie sociale, mais la reproductibilité maximale des performances dans un cadre totalement modélisé. - -La mortalité y est énorme, non pas par négligence, mais par *conception*. Il s'agit, selon la formule de Karl Schlögel (*Terreur et rêve*, 2008), de "machines de survie minimale", où la vie n’a d’autre valeur que sa contribution immédiate à l’effort du plan. Les convois ferroviaires qui alimentent les usines en hommes et en matières sont planifiés comme des flux logistiques. On y administre des corps-débits, non des existences. Ce n’est pas seulement une économie de guerre : c’est une économie de la mort régulée, où les *koulaks*, les prisonniers, les dissidents sont dissous dans le calcul productif. Chaque tonne d'acier ou d'armement est achetée au prix d’un surtravail, d’une sous-nutrition, d’un effacement subjectif. - -Le troisième cas — la guerre fasciste comme régime de production destructrice — correspond à une militarisation complète de la société sous régime archicratique. L’Italie mussolinienne offre un exemple paradigmatique : sous le dogme du *produttivismo fascista*, la société entière est reconfigurée comme machine de guerre et de rendement. Les usines deviennent casernes ; les syndicats, organes de mobilisation étatisés ; les écoles, lieux d’endoctrinement ; les journaux, instruments d’unification cratiale. L’idéologie fasciste vise à supprimer le conflit social par son absorption disciplinaire : plus de classe, plus de désaccord, mais un seul peuple — producteur, viril, uniforme. - -L’encadrement productif devient un régulateur moral. Comme le théorise Antonio Gramsci dans *Americanism and Fordism* (1934), le fascisme n’est pas tant une réaction que l’appropriation politique des logiques tayloristes au service d’une homogénéisation nationale. L’usine et la caserne fusionnent. Le rendement devient vertu. La guerre devient horizon. L’élimination des "dégénérés", des "parasites", des "non-productifs", s’intègre dans la norme collective. Ici encore, la régulation ne vise pas seulement à stabiliser, mais à purifier en éliminant l’hétérogène comme anomalie anti-productive. - -Ces trois cas — Auschwitz-Buna, Oural soviétique, Italie fasciste — ne doivent pas être lus comme des pathologies du système industriel, mais comme ses aboutissements possibles lorsqu’il est détaché de toute scène réflexive, délibérative et contradictoire. Ils illustrent une vérité fondamentale pour notre thèse : l’archicration, lorsqu’elle se ferme sur elle-même, devient un appareil d’extinction. - -En prenant au sérieux les analyses croisées de Zygmunt Bauman (*Modernité et Holocauste*, 1989), Raul Hilberg (*La destruction des Juifs d’Europe*, 1961), Timothy Snyder (*Terres de sang*, 2010), mais aussi les lectures critiques de Foucault sur le biopouvoir (*Il faut défendre la société*, 1976), nous voyons que la régulation moderne n’est pas réductible à une fonction stabilisatrice de l’ordre social, mais qu’elle constitue une tension structurelle entre production de la forme et possibilité de la déformation, entre gestion du vivant et potentialité de sa suppression méthodique. - -L’étude de ces cas-limites — Auschwitz-Buna, Gosplan, fascisme productiviste — montre avec netteté que l’archicration peut s’autonomiser jusqu’à faire disparaître le politique dans le fonctionnel, le dissensus dans l’efficience et, à la limite, la vie elle-même dans le plan. Le crime n’apparaît plus ici comme un geste transgressif, mais comme une procédure. L’extermination elle-même prend la forme d’une ligne logistique, d’un calcul de rendement, d’une opération statistique. Comme le note Giorgio Agamben dans *Ce qui reste d’Auschwitz* (1998), la limite de l’humain est atteinte quand le pouvoir de produire la norme ne rencontre plus aucun contre-pouvoir de la parole ou du droit. C’est précisément là que l’*archicration* devient sa propre négation : une forme de gouvernance dont la finalité n’est plus la vie ordonnée, mais l’élimination ordonnée du vivant. - -La leçon est claire : l’archicration n’est pas en soi progressiste, démocratique ou humaniste. Elle est un opérateur formel de régulation, susceptible d’être modulé vers la stabilisation inclusive ou vers la destruction exclusive, selon la manière dont les autres polarités tensionnelles — cratialité et arcalité — dans leurs conflictualités sont articulées. La rationalisation fordiste peut déboucher sur le pacte social, comme elle peut dériver vers la chaîne de mort. La bureaucratie peut organiser les droits, ou bien les convois. - -Autrement dit, il n’existe pas de progrès historique sans régulation ; mais toute régulation privée de contre-épreuve peut devenir une administration de la disparition. C’est à cette condition que nous comprenons pleinement ce que signifie penser l’*archicration* comme *fait social total* : non pas un simple outil de coordination, mais une forme historique du possible, dont les régimes d’actualisation doivent être constamment questionnés, contraints, redoublés de critique et d’alerte. - -La Seconde Révolution Industrielle, dans ses versants infrastructurel, productif, institutionnel et exterminateur, constitue ainsi un laboratoire décisif de la modernité régulatrice : elle montre la puissance inédite de l’archicration à structurer le monde, mais aussi son danger radical lorsqu’elle se soustrait à toute scène contradictoire et délibérative. Notre thèse bascule alors d’un constat descriptif à une exigence critique : penser la régulation, c’est aussi penser ses garde-fous, ses seuils et ses points de bascule. Cela impose une vigilance épistémique constante sur les formes, les dispositifs et les métriques par lesquels nous prétendons organiser la vie commune. +À Billancourt, l'adoption du modèle fordiste s'effectue dans un contexte +politique et social profondément différent. Le régime républicain, le +rôle actif des syndicats et la mémoire des luttes sociales modifient +profondément la nature de cette régulation collective. + +Dans l'entre-deux-guerres, les usines Renault développent des chaînes +inspirées de Ford, mais sans jamais atteindre la même fluidité, ni la +même intensité prescriptive. Le fordisme y est tempéré par la +conflictualité sociale, par l'intervention étatique, par les +institutions du Front populaire. En 1936, les accords de Matignon +instaurent les congés payés, la semaine de 40 heures, les délégués +d'atelier : autant de dispositifs qui encadrent la puissance patronale, +sans pour autant abolir la logique cratiale. + +L'archicration y prend la forme d'une scène négociée. Elle se déploie +sur un mode dialectique, entre impulsions productivistes et résistances +collectives. Le pouvoir ne s'y exerce pas unilatéralement : il est +contraint de se formuler, de se justifier, de s'institutionnaliser. +Cette tension structurelle confère à Renault un statut particulier : +celui d'un espace de régulation mixte, où coexistent codification +disciplinaire et conflictualité instituante. Il s'agit d'une +configuration archicratique tendue, jamais pleinement stabilisée. + +Italie fasciste : nationalisation totalitaire de la cratialité +collective + +Le cas italien marque, lui, un basculement radical. Avec le fascisme +mussolinien, la cratialité collective se voit absorbée dans un processus +de totalisation politique : la force de travail n'est plus seulement +organisée, elle est *incorporée* à l'État. L'économie est nationalisée +dans l'imaginaire de guerre, le travail élevé au rang de dévotion +civique, et l'ouvrier redéfini comme soldat de la patrie. + +L'*Opera Nazionale Dopolavoro*, créée en 1925, incarne cette régulation +intégrale de la vie ouvrière : contrôle du temps libre, encadrement +culturel, organisation de la sociabilité. Le syndicat est aboli en tant +qu'organe de lutte — il est refondu en *corporation*, intégré à +l'État, privé d'autonomie. La production cesse d'être un champ +d'opposition : elle est sacralisée comme fonction nationale. Cette +fusion entre pouvoir politique, commandement économique et normativité +morale produit une archicration fasciste, c'est-à-dire une régulation +totalisante où toute résistance est assimilée à une trahison. + +Gramsci, là encore, l'avait vu : dans sa lecture du fordisme, il montre +que ce dernier peut être *progressiste* dans une société démocratique, +mais *réactionnaire* dans un cadre autoritaire. Le point décisif est ici +que l'archicration n'a pas, en elle-même, de contenu moral propre. Elle +demeure un opérateur formel, modulable selon les régimes de légitimité +et les structures de pouvoir. Le cas italien en illustre la pente la +plus sombre : l'annihilation de la conflictualité par la sacralisation +de l'unité. + +L'analyse de la cratialité collective dans la seconde révolution +industrielle fait apparaître moins l'uniformité d'un modèle +productiviste que la diversité des formes de subjectivation encadrées +sous régime industriel : le pouvoir n'agit plus seulement sur des corps, +il orchestre des masses. Ce passage du disciplinaire au collectif régulé +constitue une rupture de phase du processus archicratique. La contrainte +ne disparaît pas : elle se transforme, se diffuse et s'intériorise à +travers les matrices de synchronisation et de rationalisation du +travail. + +Avec le taylorisme puis le fordisme, la force devient fonction : la +puissance humaine est convertie en séquence opératoire calibrée par une +norme d'efficience extérieure à elle. Le travailleur n'est plus sujet de +son geste, mais agent d'une chaîne dont il épouse le rythme, le +protocole, l'économie symbolique. On peut y reconnaître, dans un lexique +foucaldien, une forme de gouvernementalité par ajustement — où le +contrôle n'opère plus par surveillance frontale mais par *encadrement +des marges*, par *canalisation du possible*. La force collective est +capturée par la logique du flux. + +La spécificité de cette époque tient aussi à ceci : la rationalisation +productive s'accompagne d'une institutionnalisation régulée de la +conflictualité. Le syndicat, loin d'être simplement réprimé ou +marginalisé, est en de nombreux cas intégré à la scène régulatoire. Il +devient partie prenante du compromis cratial. Co-gestionnaire dans les +modèles allemands, négociateur des conventions dans les modèles +américains, acteur du compromis républicain en France, le syndicat opère +comme opérateur de régulation contrôlée du conflit — c'est-à-dire +comme mécanisme d'inscription du dissensus dans un cadre négocié. Cette +inclusion paradoxale de l'opposition dans l'architecture du pouvoir +constitue l'un des traits majeurs de la cratialité moderne. + +À l'inverse, lorsque cette conflictualité est niée — comme dans le +modèle corporatiste fasciste —, le pouvoir cratial se retourne contre +lui-même : il cesse de réguler pour imposer. Il ne modèle plus les +conduites ; il les remplace par des rituels d'allégeance. C'est ici que +l'on saisit, dans sa netteté la plus tranchante, le basculement entre +cratialité encadrante et cratialité totalisante : lorsque la force +collective n'est plus modulée mais fétichisée, lorsqu'elle n'est plus +négociée mais sacralisée, elle cesse d'être opératoire — elle devient +*objet de culte*. C'est le moment où l'archicration se dissout dans +l'idéologie. + +Le siècle fordiste ne se limite pas à une montée en puissance de la +rationalité économique. Il correspond à un moment où le pouvoir s'exerce +de plus en plus à l'échelle des collectifs de travail, à travers +l'organisation des masses, la structuration des rythmes productifs et +l'encadrement des conduites. Le pouvoir n'administre plus des individus +isolés : il orchestre des subjectivations synchronisées. Et c'est cette +*composition d'ensemble* — au croisement de l'économie, de la +technique, du droit et du psychopolitique — que nous devons +reconnaître comme un régime spécifique de cratialité collective. + +Cette cratialité n'existe toutefois jamais à l'état pur. Toujours prise +dans des tensions et des bifurcations, elle n'accède à la régulation +instituée qu'à travers un cadre, un code et une scène : c'est à ce point +qu'elle rejoint l'archicration. L'histoire de la régulation industrielle +apparaît alors moins comme une montée linéaire du contrôle que comme une +série de compositions instables entre force et forme, entre masse et +ordre, entre élan vital et cadence mécanique. + +La prochaine section prolongera cette exploration en montrant que la +puissance collective, une fois capturée, peut être orientée aussi bien +vers la stabilisation démocratique que vers l'éradication totalitaire. +Nous basculerons alors d'une cratialité de synchronisation à une +archicration de modélisation systémique. + +### **4.3.3 — Archicration institutionnelle négociée : contrat social fordiste, assurance, bureaucratie stabilisante** + +La première moitié du XXe siècle marque une mutation de la scène même de +la régulation. Là où la cratialité industrielle avait constitué la force +en masse mobilisable et où l'arcalité infrastructurelle avait instauré +les conditions de la gouvernabilité matérielle du réel, s'institue +désormais une scène de négociation, c'est-à-dire une forme contractuelle +d'encadrement des forces productives. C'est le moment où émerge une +archicration institutionnelle : une régulation appuyée sur la médiation +formelle, le compromis codifié et la structuration légitime des rapports +sociaux. + +À la coercition unilatérale des débuts de l'ère industrielle succède une +tentative de composition du pouvoir régulateur, appuyée sur la +consolidation d'un compromis historique entre capital, travail et État. +Le pacte fordiste, dans ses variantes nord-américaines, européennes et +scandinaves, n'est pas seulement une transformation des modes de +gestion. Il marque une inflexion profonde dans la logique même de +l'archicration. Elle passe désormais par la norme, s'articule à des +cadres juridiques, se négocie dans des instances représentatives et se +matérialise dans des institutions de redistribution et de sécurisation +collective. + +Dans ce mouvement, le droit du travail, en pleine expansion dès +l'entre-deux-guerres, joue un rôle décisif de régulation différée : il +permet d'absorber les conflits sociaux dans une grammaire contractuelle +stabilisée, juridiquement opposable et fortement codifiée. La +jurisprudence participe ici à un dispositif de pacification. Norme +salariale, conventions collectives, fixation légale du temps de travail, +encadrement des licenciements, mécanismes d'arbitrage : autant +d'instruments d'une régulation fondée sur la délibération encadrée, +autrement dit sur l'institutionnalisation de la controverse. + +Le trait décisif de cette phase est le suivant : l'archicration ne +s'impose plus par la brutalité de la forme, ni par la matérialité de +l'infrastructure ; elle se tisse dans les protocoles, les accords, les +corps intermédiaires et les institutions collectives. Elle prend la +forme de ce que Norbert Elias nommait une configuration : une +interdépendance organisée, dans laquelle chaque acteur module sa force +en fonction de celle des autres, sous contrainte réciproque. + +Mais cette négociation n'est jamais libre ; elle est déjà structurée +archicratiquement. Et ce cadre, c'est celui d'un État rationalisé, +désormais en position de garant des compromis productifs et sociaux. +L'État cesse d'être un simple arbitre pour devenir un agent actif de la +régulation, à travers la production de normes, la redistribution des +richesses, l'institutionnalisation de droits, la gestion des flux +sociaux. Il devient l'organisateur du compromis régulateur. + +C'est dans le paradigme fordiste que l'archicration institutionnelle +atteint sa formulation la plus cohérente et la plus stabilisée. +Frederick Winslow Taylor, en posant les fondements d'une *gestion +scientifique du travail* (The Principles of Scientific Management, +1911), avait déjà introduit une *cratialité calculée*, fondée sur la +sélection, la mesure, l'optimisation des gestes. Mais c'est Henry Ford +qui transforme ce rationalisme gestionnaire en architecture régulatoire +globale. Le passage du taylorisme au fordisme n'est pas une simple +évolution technique : il constitue une reconfiguration archicratique. À +partir de 1913, dans l'usine de Highland Park à Detroit, s'installe une +configuration où la régulation du geste productif, du temps de travail, +du salaire et du mode de vie s'agence en un dispositif unifié de +normalisation existentielle. + +En fixant un salaire journalier de 5 dollars, Ford ne cherche pas à +"récompenser" la force de travail, mais à l'indexer sur la reproduction +d'un mode de vie compatible avec l'accumulation capitalistique. Le +salaire devient un levier de stabilisation sociale, un outil +d'intériorisation des rythmes de production et un moyen d'attacher le +travailleur à l'ordre productif. Le salaire cesse ainsi d'être un simple +échange marchand pour devenir un opérateur de régulation des conduites. +Il aligne le désir individuel sur l'intérêt systémique. Il transforme le +travailleur en consommateur solvable, et le consommateur en agent de +reproduction du système. + +Le fordisme est à la fois un mode de production et une manière +d'ordonner les temporalités de la vie : travail stable, salaire fixe, +crédit encadré, consommation normée, sécurité prévisible, accès +progressif à la propriété. Il impose des trajectoires de vie +relativement typées, des biographies régulées, des attentes +standardisées. On peut lire ce dispositif, à la manière de Foucault, +comme une forme de gouvernementalité salariale, dans laquelle les +trajectoires de vie sont organisées selon des matrices de prévisibilité +: entrée dans la vie active, constitution du foyer, achat de biens +durables, intégration institutionnelle, retraite garantie. La normalité +devient l'objet de parcours. + +Le fordisme aligne étroitement production, consommation et régulation +sociale. Là où le taylorisme organisait les gestes, il étend la +rationalisation aux désirs, aux habitudes et aux projections de vie. Il +ne se contente pas de fabriquer des voitures : il fabrique des modes de +vie, des habitudes, des attentes. Le modèle suburbain états-unien, avec +ses lotissements, ses banlieues résidentielles, ses crédits à taux +préférentiels, ses supermarchés, ses assurances, ses routines, est la +forme la plus achevée de cette archicration par le salariat. + +Mais cette stabilisation n'est possible que parce qu'elle s'appuie sur +un État co-producteur de la sécurité sociale. Le New Deal aux États-Unis +(1933–1939), les lois sociales du Front populaire en France (1936), le +Beveridge Report au Royaume-Uni (1942), constituent autant de moments où +les compromis salariaux sont repris et garantis par la puissance +publique. L'État devient garant de la stabilité de la reproduction +sociale : assurance chômage, protection contre les accidents du travail, +retraite, médecine du travail, encadrement du crédit. L'archicration se +territorialise dans les institutions publiques. Elle ne gouverne plus +par décret autoritaire, mais par lissage prévisionnel des risques, par +calcul probabiliste des trajectoires, par encadrement protecteur des +discontinuités. + +Cette forme de régulation fait émerger une figure historique spécifique +du sujet politique et social : le citoyen-salarié, à la fois producteur, +assuré, contribuable, électeur. Ce sujet est encadré non par la terreur +ni par la propagande, mais par la norme ; non par la répression, mais +par la prévisibilité. Il vit dans une économie d'existence codifiée, +dans laquelle l'instabilité est à la fois neutralisée par l'assurance et +valorisée par la performance. + +Le fordisme n'est donc pas une simple technique économique : il +configure une manière historique d'organiser l'existence sociale. Il +propose une manière d'exister dans un monde industriel : une manière de +travailler, de consommer, de se projeter, de se stabiliser. Il est +l'expression achevée d'une archicration de la sécurité — non plus +comme exception ou privilège, mais comme norme distribuée, comme horizon +de toutes les classes intégrées. + +Dans la période 1870–1945, l'État devient une composante centrale de la +régulation sociale — non plus par la législation autoritaire, mais par +la construction d'un *environnement de stabilisation* des conflits +sociaux, économiques et existentiels. C'est à cette époque que se met en +place une archicration articulée à l'État et au salariat, c'est-à-dire +un mode de régulation dans lequel l'État intervient à la fois comme +garant, comme co-producteur et comme cartographe du compromis. + +La montée de la conflictualité ouvrière (grèves massives, syndicalisme +offensif, radicalisation des luttes) ne donne pas lieu à une simple +répression ou à une restauration disciplinaire. Elle est au contraire +captée, encadrée et institutionnalisée — selon une logique de +co-optation des revendications par les dispositifs mêmes de l'État +moderne. Dès la fin du XIXe siècle, dans l'Allemagne bismarckienne, +s'amorce ce que Pierre Rosanvallon analysera plus tard comme un +processus de "politisation de la question sociale" (*La crise de +l'État-providence*, 1981) : assurances sociales (1883), accidents du +travail (1884), retraites (1889). Il s'agit d'abord d'une stratégie +régulatoire, non d'un geste humaniste. Le travailleur intégré est plus +docile, plus prévisible, plus gouvernable. + +C'est ici que la sécurité sociale apparaît comme une technique +d'anticipation des risques. En garantissant des formes de protection +contre les aléas de la vie (maladie, vieillesse, chômage), l'État crée +un régime d'adhésion implicite : chacun est intégré à une société de +calculs actuariels où le risque est à la fois pris en charge et +redistribué. L'assurance devient mode de gouvernement. Comme l'écrit +Michel Foucault dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), la gestion +des risques n'est plus une externalité : elle devient un *vecteur de +gouvernementalité*. Et cette gouvernementalité ne s'exerce pas par la +norme morale, mais par l'architecture d'un horizon calculable — dans +lequel chacun devient responsable, mais dans les bornes d'un système +d'incitation. + +L'État assure, mais il planifie aussi. Le cas du *Commissariat général +du Plan* en France (créé en 1946, mais pensé dès la guerre), ou celui du +*Gosplan* soviétique dès 1921, témoigne de la montée d'un État stratège, +qui n'improvise plus, mais modélise. La régulation devient anticipatrice +: quotas, projections, scénarios, indicateurs. L'économie cesse d'être +laissée à l'équilibre spontané — elle est encadrée par des matrices de +prévision. Cette planification, qu'elle soit centralisée (URSS), +indicative (France) ou sectorielle (New Deal américain), marque une +rupture épistémologique : le futur devient gouvernable. + +Mais cette projection du futur repose sur un travail de mise en +compatibilité des intérêts. L'État devient *médiateur technique des +antagonismes sociaux*. Il ne supprime pas les conflits, il les +reformule. Il les traduit en variables, en courbes, en objectifs, en +compromis. Le conflit ne se joue plus dans la rue — il se déplace dans +les commissions, les tables de négociation, les conventions collectives. +La loi du 23 avril 1919 en France (instaurant la journée de 8 heures) +n'est pas un acte révolutionnaire : elle est le produit d'un compromis +régulatoire, visant à stabiliser la productivité post-guerre tout en +intégrant les revendications ouvrières. + +S'installe alors une régulation par la formalisation : tableaux, normes, +grilles, droits et seuils. Et cette gouvernance est opérée par une +bureaucratie stabilisatrice, dont Max Weber avait bien saisi la +dynamique : rationalisation légale-formelle, spécialisation des tâches, +neutralité procédurale. Mais cette neutralité est une illusion : la +bureaucratie régule les effets d'instabilité systémiques, tout en +invisibilisant leur origine politique. Elle est un amortisseur +symbolique. + +Dans ce contexte, le compromis social devient une technique de +gouvernement. Il ne s'agit plus de trancher, mais de lisser. Plus de +commander, mais d'inciter. Plus de réprimer, mais de pré-allouer. C'est +l'ère des conventions collectives, des partenaires sociaux, des comités +mixtes, des tables rondes. L'État n'est plus souverain au sens classique +: il est *modulateur des flux et des déséquilibres*. Il devient, pour +reprendre l'expression d'Alain Supiot, un État justificateur, qui se +donne pour fonction non de commander, mais de garantir la cohérence +narrative des régulations. + +Ce compromis social d'État s'accompagne enfin d'un pacte implicite de +croissance et de discipline. Les syndicats, intégrés dans la gouvernance +des dispositifs, acceptent de contenir les revendications en échange +d'une redistribution partielle de la richesse. C'est l'essence du +fordisme politique : la paix sociale contre la consommation garantie ; +la docilité collective contre la stabilité prévisionnelle. Ce n'est pas +la fin du conflit — c'est son déplacement dans un théâtre régulé. + +L'archicration institutionnelle négociée ne supprime pas les tensions : +elle en organise la gestion sélective, en redistribue les seuils +d'acceptabilité, et surtout en désactive les foyers de conflictualité +non compatibles avec l'ordre calculé. Ce n'est pas une pacification, +c'est une *mise en forme* des tensions — dont l'effet structurel est +de normaliser la conflictualité acceptable tout en reléguant dans +l'indicible, l'invisible ou l'illégitime, toutes les formes de dissensus +inassimilables. + +Le paradoxe tient à ce que la reconnaissance étatique des revendications +collectives — à travers la sécurité sociale, les conventions +collectives et les négociations paritaires — fonctionne comme +opérateur de neutralisation politique. Là où une lutte pouvait être +vécue comme insurrectionnelle ou radicalement antagoniste (grèves +sauvages, occupations, refus du travail), elle est reconfigurée en +différend technique, traité dans un dialogue d'experts, de représentants +et d'instances. L'État ne se contente pas de pacifier : il dépolitise +une part du conflit en le traduisant en paramètres d'ajustement. + +Ce processus a été magistralement analysé par Jacques Rancière dans *La +mésentente* (1995), lorsqu'il distingue le politique du policier. Pour +Rancière, le politique est la manifestation d'un tort, d'une part non +reconnue, d'un surgissement de l'incompté ; tandis que le policier est +le régime de la répartition des places et des fonctions — c'est-à-dire +la distribution normative de ce qui peut être vu, dit, entendu. Dans +notre cadre, la régulation archicratique étatique devient un policement +de l'espace politique : elle absorbe les voix dissonantes dans une +architecture où seul le compatible peut être pris en charge. + +Mais cette absorption implique nécessairement l'exclusion de ce qui ne +peut pas être traduit dans les termes du compromis. Se trouvent ainsi +neutralisées toutes les formes de subjectivation politique qui échappent +à la mise en équation des intérêts : les *sans-parts* (Rancière), les +*surnuméraires* (Castel), les *non-alignés productifs*. La régulation +devient exclusive non par coercition directe, mais par +*inintelligibilité structurelle*. Si vous ne pouvez être assigné à une +fonction, une classe, un statut, un régime de protection, vous êtes +expulsé du régime de régulation. Ce qui fait défaut n'est pas toujours +le droit lui-même, mais la possibilité pour le sujet d'être reconnu dans +les cadres de la régulation. + +Cette invisibilisation du dissensus est d'autant plus efficace qu'elle +s'opère sous des formes apparemment inclusives. Le progrès des droits +sociaux, la généralisation de l'assurance, l'universalisation des +protections sont perçus comme des victoires historiques (et ils le sont, +dans une certaine mesure). Mais ils opèrent aussi comme filtres de +légitimation, selon lesquels seules les demandes articulées dans les +catégories du compromis sont recevables. Tout ce qui relève de la +transformation structurelle du régime même de régulation — critique +radicale du travail, du salariat, de la croissance, de +l'institutionnalisation — est déplacé hors du périmètre des +"revendications légitimes". + +Ce mécanisme est puissamment actif dans la période 1920–1940, au moment +où les institutions de régulation se durcissent sous l'effet conjugué de +la montée des totalitarismes et de la crise du capitalisme libéral. Le +New Deal américain, par exemple, constitue une puissante machine de +réencodage des conflits : il crée la *Social Security Act* (1935), la +*Wagner Act* (1935) sur les conventions collectives, le *Civilian +Conservation Corps* — mais aussi une architecture d'intégration +surveillée, où les syndicats deviennent co-gestionnaires de la +discipline sociale. Le dissensus radical (syndicalisme révolutionnaire, +anarcho-syndicalisme, communisme de base) est marginalisé, persécuté, +dissous dans la modération contractuelle. + +La France de la Troisième République n'est pas en reste. Le Front +populaire (1936), tout en concédant congés payés et semaine de 40 +heures, opère un retournement stratégique : il neutralise le potentiel +insurrectionnel de la grève générale en la traduisant en gains +mesurables. Le mot d'ordre devient alors la stabilisation plutôt que la +transformation. Même les avant-gardes critiques (par exemple, les +groupes surréalistes politisés autour de Georges Bataille ou les +syndicalistes de la CGT-U) se heurtent à une clôture du possible : la +régulation absorbe tout — sauf ce qui conteste le cadre même de la +régulation. + +Enfin, cette invisibilisation du dissensus s'accompagne d'une +normalisation des subjectivités. L'individu intégré dans la régulation +devient un porteur de droits, mais aussi un agent de reproduction du +régime régulateur. Le salarié assuré, syndiqué et planifié est aussi un +individu canalisé dans ses conduites : son corps est réglé par les +rythmes du travail, ses risques intégrés dans les calculs actuariels, +ses aspirations orientées vers la carrière, la consommation et la +retraite. + +### **4.3.4 — Archicration exterminatrice : machinerie totalitaire, industrialisation de la destruction** + +Pour saisir la dimension thanatopolitique du phénomène archicratique, il +faut partir de ce que Zygmunt Bauman a nommé, dans *Modernité et +Holocauste* (1989), le paradoxe d'Auschwitz. Ce paradoxe ne tient pas +uniquement au fait qu'un génocide ait été perpétré au cœur de l'Europe +moderne, mais au fait qu'il procède non d'un effondrement de la +rationalité moderne, mais de son application méthodique, bureaucratique, +procédurale et technique. Il ne s'est pas produit en rupture avec la +civilisation rationnelle occidentale, mais en son sein, selon sa logique +et à l'aide de ses instruments administratifs et techniques. + +Auschwitz ne peut être réduit à un dérapage : il constitue un +point-limite d'une certaine forme de rationalisation régulatrice. La +logistique des convois, la standardisation des wagons à bestiaux, la +codification des "quotas" de déportés par région, la gestion "optimisée" +des corps — vivants, puis morts — tout cela procède d'une machine +régulatrice parfaitement articulée, froide, impersonnelle et dépourvue +de pathos. C'est l'administration devenue moyen de mort. Bauman montre +que la division du travail, la hiérarchisation des responsabilités, la +séparation des tâches (convoi, tri, exécution, crémation) ont permis +l'extinction de toute conflictualité morale individuelle. Le crime était +fragmenté et protocolisé. La conscience individuelle pouvait s'effacer +dans la fonction. + +Le point névralgique est le suivant : l'archicration devient +destructrice lorsque la régulation se déconnecte du jugement éthique au +profit du protocole efficient. Ce n'est pas d'abord l'arbitraire du +tyran qui tue, mais la conformité au plan et l'exécution du protocole. +Le commandement n'ordonne plus directement le meurtre : il définit des +procédures, des critères de rendement et des indicateurs d'efficacité. +Ce que Hannah Arendt avait entrevu dans son analyse de la "banalité du +mal" (*Eichmann à Jérusalem*, 1963) trouve ici un complément structurel +: la régulation peut devenir mortifère non par défaut d'intelligence, +mais par excès d'organisation. + +Or, ce modèle n'est pas spécifique au régime nazi. Il incarne une forme +extrême, mais structurellement possible, de toute logique archicratique +qui se pense hors scène, c'est-à-dire hors espace de conflictualité, +d'énonciation, de subjectivation critique. Lorsque la régulation se +réduit à une performance de gestion, que le chiffre supplante la parole, +que le plan remplace la loi et que la mesure évacue la mémoire, alors la +mort peut devenir un segment rationnel du système. Ce n'est pas une +simple dérive, mais une bifurcation interne. + +Le cas d'Auschwitz-Birkenau, et plus encore celui du complexe IG +Farben/Auschwitz III (Monowitz), en constitue l'expression la plus +nette. IG Farben, cartel industriel de la chimie allemande, y déploie +une chaîne de production de caoutchouc synthétique (Buna), alimentée par +une main-d'œuvre esclavagisée extraite du camp voisin. Les ingénieurs +organisent les rythmes de travail, calculent les seuils de productivité +et intègrent des taux de déperdition "admissibles" (sous-nutrition, +maladies, décès). La rationalisation industrielle et la mise à mort +deviennent strictement indissociables. + +L'archicration exterminatrice désigne ainsi un pouvoir régulateur qui, +en poursuivant sa propre logique d'efficience, devient capable +d'intégrer la destruction dans le plan. Il ne s'agit plus d'exercer la +domination par la force (kratos nu) ou par la loi (arkhè instituée), +mais par l'inscription de la disparition dans la trame même de la +régulation. Ce n'est plus la loi qui décide de qui doit vivre ou mourir. +C'est la planification procédurale de l'exécution, dans un espace de +rationalité opaque, post-juridique et post-morale. + +Ce qui distingue la Shoah dans l'histoire des régimes exterminateurs, ce +n'est pas seulement son ampleur ni même sa systématicité : c'est la +manière dont elle fut conduite comme une entreprise logistique, un +processus d'optimisation et un enchaînement de procédures dans un monde +bureaucratiquement structuré. Dans cette configuration, la disparition +des personnes ne fut pas pensée comme un acte de guerre ou une vengeance +idéologique ponctuelle, mais comme un flux à gérer, un problème à +résoudre, un stock à écouler. Se met ainsi en place ce que nous nommons +ici une archicration exterminatrice par logistique — c'est-à-dire +l'intégration de l'éradication dans les structures opératoires du +pouvoir régulateur. + +Comme l'a démontré Raul Hilberg dans *La destruction des Juifs d'Europe* +(1961), l'extermination nazie ne fut pas improvisée dans un élan de +fanatisme : elle fut l'objet d'une construction administrative +progressive, passant par des étapes précises — discrimination, +expulsion, concentration, déportation, élimination —, toutes traitées +comme des problèmes logistiques soumis à résolution technique. Les +ministères impliqués (Intérieur, Transports, Économie) ne pensaient pas +"extermination" mais "déplacement", "affectation", "réallocation". Le +langage lui-même fut administré. Le mot *Endlösung* — "solution +finale" — n'indique pas un moment de rupture, mais l'acmé d'un +processus de rationalisation. + +Chaque convoi était planifié avec une exactitude métronomique : date de +départ, nombre de wagons, densité de chargement, délai d'acheminement et +coordination avec les horaires des trains de fret et de passagers. La +Banque de données du Reichsbahn traitait les juifs comme une catégorie +de fret parmi d'autres. Le chef du département de transport du RSHA, +Adolf Eichmann, se comportait comme un fonctionnaire soucieux +d'efficacité : les vies humaines avaient été réduites à des unités +logistiques à déplacer à coût minimal. + +L'extinction des subjectivités précède ici la mort biologique : elle +s'opère dès que l'individu devient une variable d'un plan, dès que son +existence est reconfigurée comme "cas" dans une grille d'élimination. +C'est ici que la régulation atteint une fonction létale. Non pas en +ordonnant la mort, mais en intégrant l'effacement dans une chaîne +opératoire de décisions anonymisées. + +Dans cette rationalité logistique, il n'y a plus d'ennemi politique, +plus de visage à haïr, plus de "barbare" à soumettre. Il n'y a qu'un +problème démographique à résoudre, une anomalie statistique à corriger, +une charge à évacuer. La *Zählbarkeit* — la "comptabilité" — devient +la forme de la souveraineté négative. Ce que l'on ne peut intégrer au +plan (les Juifs, les Tsiganes, les homosexuels, les handicapés, les +résistants) doit être supprimé non pas en tant qu'adversaire, mais en +tant qu'élément incompatible avec le système. + +Le convoi, dans cette perspective, devient l'unité matérielle de la +régulation exterminatrice. Il articule transport, temporalité, +destination et mise à mort dans une même chaîne opératoire. Il devient +l'instrument mobile de la disparition et de la désubjectivation. Les +camps d'extermination — Sobibor, Treblinka, Auschwitz — ne sont pas +des lieux exceptionnels : ils sont des points terminaux d'une logistique +d'État, des hubs de traitement final, des nœuds du réseau archicratique +mortifère. + +Il est essentiel de comprendre que cette archicration exterminatrice ne +s'oppose pas à la modernité régulatrice : elle l'accomplit en creux. +C'est la démonstration ultime que toute régulation déconnectée de la +scène réflexive, de la conflictualité politique, de la normativité +vivante, peut devenir instrument de mort par excès d'efficience. Ce +n'est plus d'abord l'arbitraire du tyran ni la violence du soldat, mais +la planification administrative, le calcul et la froideur des +dispositifs. + +C'est ce basculement que notre thèse doit rendre visible dans toute son +horreur rationnelle. L'archicration, si elle n'est pas inscrite dans une +scène critique, dans une conflictualité des finalités, dans un horizon +de sens partagé, peut devenir la forme la plus létale du pouvoir moderne — précisément parce qu'elle n'en a pas l'apparence. + +La planification soviétique, loin d'être un simple mécanisme économique +d'organisation de la production dans un cadre socialiste, incarne une +forme radicale et totalisante de régulation archicratique : le projet +d'un monde intégralement piloté, modélisé et rationalisé selon une +ingénierie des flux humains, matériels et symboliques. Le +*Gosudarstvennyi Planovyi Komitet* — Gosplan — établi dès 1921, +devient rapidement le cœur névralgique d'un pouvoir qui ne se contente +plus de gouverner : il fabrique la réalité en la codant par le plan. +L'archicration y prend alors une forme extrême : celle de la +modélisation performative de l'existence. + +À la différence des régulations dispersées du XIXe siècle ou même des +architectures standards du fordisme, la planification soviétique ne +tolère aucune extériorité. Elle constitue une forme de souveraineté +totale non plus par la contrainte frontale, mais par la préemption de +l'avenir. Le plan quinquennal — *piatiletka* — ne propose pas une +orientation : il impose une réalité anticipée, qu'il faut réaliser coûte +que coûte. L'économie cesse alors d'être un domaine d'échange ou de +production pour devenir le théâtre d'une régulation intégrale, intégrée, +inscrite dans tous les segments du vivant et du social. + +Cette archicration planificatrice repose sur trois dimensions +étroitement liées : modélisation mathématique, contrôle bureaucratique, +extermination différentielle. La réalité n'est plus l'objet d'un +traitement politique, mais le produit d'une modélisation normative : +statistiques de rendement, tableaux de productivité, quotas +d'extraction, courbes de croissance, matrices de circulation. Le réel +doit correspondre au plan — et non l'inverse. Tout écart devient +suspect ; toute anomalie doit être éliminée ; tout débordement est +interprété comme erreur du système ou sabotage conscient. +L'anéantissement de classe naît ici d'un excès de régulation. + +Ce n'est pas un hasard si les grandes purges staliniennes — notamment +entre 1936 et 1938 — ciblent avant tout les ingénieurs, les directeurs +d'usine, les économistes, les planificateurs : la guerre de classe +devient une guerre contre les écarts statistiques. Le *koulak*, le +"sabot" du plan, n'est plus simplement un opposant politique, mais une +résistance au régime de visibilité du plan lui-même. Comme l'a perçu +Michel Foucault dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), la +rationalité gouvernante peut basculer dans un *hyper-pouvoir de +pilotage* — non plus par la loi ou la morale, mais par l'anticipation +et la capture des comportements. Le plan soviétique apparaît ainsi comme +une forme de captation prédatrice du futur. + +Ainsi, les déportations massives vers le Goulag ne relèvent pas d'une +politique d'exception : elles sont intégrées dans la logique du plan. Le +camp devient une unité productive, le prisonnier une force de travail +calibrée et le convoi une variable d'ajustement. Le camp n'est pas un +simple espace de relégation : il devient un instrument d'ajustement +interne du plan, le lieu où l'écart est réabsorbé dans l'économie du +projet. Comme l'a démontré Moshe Lewin dans *Le Siècle soviétique* +(2003), le système stalinien ne tolère aucune contradiction externe — il les internalise comme moments nécessaires de son perfectionnement +normatif. + +C'est pourquoi l'on peut affirmer que le *Gosplan* est le paradigme +d'une archicration à fonction totalitaire : non pas par excès d'autorité +visible, mais par hypertrophie de la rationalité régulatrice. Il ne +commande pas seulement : il modélise, encode et planifie l'élimination +comme fonction du calibrage du système. Il se présente non comme pouvoir +de domination, mais comme agent de vérité prévisible. Il fonctionne +comme une machine de projection normative, produisant de l'obligation, +configurant le réel et générant de la violence par mise en conformité. + +Dans ce contexte, l'idéologie marxiste-léniniste devient le langage +opératoire de la régulation : le discours de la nécessité historique +remplace la scène du débat, la dialectique se rigidifie en protocole et +la lutte des classes se transforme en mécanisme d'ajustement social. Le +pouvoir soviétique, au sommet de cette rationalisation, ne se pense plus +comme contingent ni conflictuel : il se pense comme régulation +structurelle du devenir collectif, comme instance qui garantit que +l'histoire se déroule comme prévu. + +La mort n'y survient donc pas comme accident ou tragédie : elle devient +une variable intégrée. Il ne s'agit pas seulement d'une volonté de tuer, +mais d'une rationalité qui transforme l'élimination de ce qui ne +correspond pas aux prévisions en nécessité systémique. Dans cette +architecture régulatrice, l'extermination de classe est l'effet logique +du plan — non pas sa trahison. + +Il faut alors l'affirmer clairement : la régulation, si elle n'est pas +adossée à une scène délibérative, à une conflictualité politique +assumée, à une réflexivité publique, peut devenir le plus létal des +pouvoirs. Non pas par abus de violence, mais par trop-plein de norme. +C'est la leçon majeure du plan soviétique : qu'un monde régulé jusqu'à +la racine peut devenir un monde invivable — non pas en dépit du plan, +mais à cause de lui. + +Il ne s'agit plus ici d'une violence exceptionnelle ou contingente, mais +d'une forme de régulation portée à son point de paroxysme, où la +destruction des corps humains devient *une fonction intégrée au système +productif*. Ce sont des cas où l'archicration moderne — censée +produire l'ordre, l'efficience, la stabilité — bascule dans une +logique d'extermination programmée, organisée, planifiée, sans jamais +cesser d'être normative, bureaucratique, régulatrice. Auschwitz, l'Oural +soviétique et la guerre fasciste constituent trois figures majeures de +ce point-limite de la régulation totale, où le vivant n'est plus un +sujet à gouverner mais un stock à gérer, un obstacle à éliminer, un +*surplus à administrer*. + +Le complexe Auschwitz-Buna-Monowitz en constitue une matrice +paroxystique. Ce n'est pas un hasard si ce camp de concentration, situé +à proximité d'Auschwitz III, fut intégré dans l'orbite industrielle du +géant IG Farben, pour y produire du caoutchouc synthétique (*Buna*). +Ici, le travail forcé et l'extermination ne sont pas dissociés, mais +techniquement intriqués. Le camp fonctionne selon des objectifs de +rendement, de sélection, de coût-bénéfice. Comme le montre Zygmunt +Bauman (*Modernité et Holocauste*, 1989), ce qui se joue à +Auschwitz-Buna n'est pas un déchaînement pulsionnel, mais l'articulation +fonctionnelle entre rationalité industrielle et projet génocidaire. La +chaîne de mort est une chaîne de production. L'espace est planifié, le +temps optimisé, la main-d'œuvre sélectionnée selon ses capacités, et les +"inutiles" éliminés à l'entrée. La régulation devient triage, et le +triage devient meurtre. + +La machinerie de l'extermination — logistique, administrative, +technique — y est perfectionnée à l'échelle de l'organisation +scientifique du travail. Raul Hilberg (*La destruction des Juifs +d'Europe*, 1961) montre que cette extermination fut orchestrée à travers +une multitude de micro-décisions, de fichiers, de transports, de +procédures, d'accords inter-agences. Le convoi n°53 du 26 mars 1943, par +exemple, emportant 1 003 Juifs vers Sobibor, résulte d'une convergence +de décisions entre la Reichsbahn (chemin de fer), la SS, les polices +locales, et le ministère des Transports. Il ne s'agit donc pas de chaos +administratif, mais d'un régime de régulation interopérable, convergent, +inter-institutionnel, orienté vers la destruction. + +Cette régulation exterminatrice n'est pas l'exclusivité du régime nazi. +Elle trouve un autre modèle, tout aussi terrifiant, dans les politiques +de déplacement industriel et de guerre menées en Union soviétique, +notamment durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Dès 1941, face à l'invasion +allemande, plus de 1 500 usines sont déplacées vers l'Oural et la +Sibérie, impliquant des millions de travailleurs contraints, souvent +prisonniers ou déportés politiques, intégrés dans un système productif +de guerre. Ces « villes nouvelles », telles que Magnitogorsk ou +Sverdlovsk, ne sont pas des centres urbains mais des matrices +régulatoires intégrées, où la vie humaine est calibrée selon la +productivité. Comme l'analyse Stephen Kotkin dans *Magnetic Mountain: +Stalinism as a Civilization* (1995), ces cités ne visent pas l'autonomie +sociale, mais la reproductibilité maximale des performances dans un +cadre totalement modélisé. + +La mortalité y est énorme, non pas par négligence, mais par +*conception*. Il s'agit, selon la formule de Karl Schlögel (*Terreur et +rêve*, 2008), de "machines de survie minimale", où la vie n'a d'autre +valeur que sa contribution immédiate à l'effort du plan. Les convois +ferroviaires qui alimentent les usines en hommes et en matières sont +planifiés comme des flux logistiques. On y administre des corps-débits, +non des existences. Ce n'est pas seulement une économie de guerre : +c'est une économie de la mort régulée, où les *koulaks*, les +prisonniers, les dissidents sont dissous dans le calcul productif. +Chaque tonne d'acier ou d'armement est achetée au prix d'un surtravail, +d'une sous-nutrition, d'un effacement subjectif. + +Le troisième cas — la guerre fasciste comme régime de production +destructrice — correspond à une militarisation complète de la société +sous régime archicratique. L'Italie mussolinienne offre un exemple +paradigmatique : sous le dogme du *produttivismo fascista*, la société +entière est reconfigurée comme machine de guerre et de rendement. Les +usines deviennent casernes ; les syndicats, organes de mobilisation +étatisés ; les écoles, lieux d'endoctrinement ; les journaux, +instruments d'unification cratiale. L'idéologie fasciste vise à +supprimer le conflit social par son absorption disciplinaire : plus de +classe, plus de désaccord, mais un seul peuple — producteur, viril, +uniforme. + +L'encadrement productif devient un régulateur moral. Comme le théorise +Antonio Gramsci dans *Americanism and Fordism* (1934), le fascisme n'est +pas tant une réaction que l'appropriation politique des logiques +tayloristes au service d'une homogénéisation nationale. L'usine et la +caserne fusionnent. Le rendement devient vertu. La guerre devient +horizon. L'élimination des "dégénérés", des "parasites", des +"non-productifs", s'intègre dans la norme collective. Ici encore, la +régulation ne vise pas seulement à stabiliser, mais à purifier en +éliminant l'hétérogène comme anomalie anti-productive. + +Ces trois cas — Auschwitz-Buna, Oural soviétique, Italie fasciste — ne doivent pas être lus comme des pathologies du système industriel, +mais comme ses aboutissements possibles lorsqu'il est détaché de toute +scène réflexive, délibérative et contradictoire. Ils illustrent une +vérité fondamentale pour notre thèse : l'archicration, lorsqu'elle se +ferme sur elle-même, devient un appareil d'extinction. + +En prenant au sérieux les analyses croisées de Zygmunt Bauman +(*Modernité et Holocauste*, 1989), Raul Hilberg (*La destruction des +Juifs d'Europe*, 1961), Timothy Snyder (*Terres de sang*, 2010), mais +aussi les lectures critiques de Foucault sur le biopouvoir (*Il faut +défendre la société*, 1976), nous voyons que la régulation moderne n'est +pas réductible à une fonction stabilisatrice de l'ordre social, mais +qu'elle constitue une tension structurelle entre production de la forme +et possibilité de la déformation, entre gestion du vivant et +potentialité de sa suppression méthodique. + +L'étude de ces cas-limites — Auschwitz-Buna, Gosplan, fascisme +productiviste — montre avec netteté que l'archicration peut +s'autonomiser jusqu'à faire disparaître le politique dans le +fonctionnel, le dissensus dans l'efficience et, à la limite, la vie +elle-même dans le plan. Le crime n'apparaît plus ici comme un geste +transgressif, mais comme une procédure. L'extermination elle-même prend +la forme d'une ligne logistique, d'un calcul de rendement, d'une +opération statistique. Comme le note Giorgio Agamben dans *Ce qui reste +d'Auschwitz* (1998), la limite de l'humain est atteinte quand le pouvoir +de produire la norme ne rencontre plus aucun contre-pouvoir de la parole +ou du droit. C'est précisément là que l'*archicration* devient sa propre +négation : une forme de gouvernance dont la finalité n'est plus la vie +ordonnée, mais l'élimination ordonnée du vivant. + +La leçon est claire : l'archicration n'est pas en soi progressiste, +démocratique ou humaniste. Elle est un opérateur formel de régulation, +susceptible d'être modulé vers la stabilisation inclusive ou vers la +destruction exclusive, selon la manière dont les autres polarités +tensionnelles — cratialité et arcalité — dans leurs conflictualités +sont articulées. La rationalisation fordiste peut déboucher sur le pacte +social, comme elle peut dériver vers la chaîne de mort. La bureaucratie +peut organiser les droits, ou bien les convois. + +Autrement dit, il n'existe pas de progrès historique sans régulation ; +mais toute régulation privée de contre-épreuve peut devenir une +administration de la disparition. C'est à cette condition que nous +comprenons pleinement ce que signifie penser l'*archicration* comme +*fait social total* : non pas un simple outil de coordination, mais une +forme historique du possible, dont les régimes d'actualisation doivent +être constamment questionnés, contraints, redoublés de critique et +d'alerte. + +La Seconde Révolution Industrielle, dans ses versants infrastructurel, +productif, institutionnel et exterminateur, constitue ainsi un +laboratoire décisif de la modernité régulatrice : elle montre la +puissance inédite de l'archicration à structurer le monde, mais aussi +son danger radical lorsqu'elle se soustrait à toute scène contradictoire +et délibérative. Notre thèse bascule alors d'un constat descriptif à une +exigence critique : penser la régulation, c'est aussi penser ses +garde-fous, ses seuils et ses points de bascule. Cela impose une +vigilance épistémique constante sur les formes, les dispositifs et les +métriques par lesquels nous prétendons organiser la vie commune. ## **4.4 — Troisième révolution industrielle (1973–2015) : régulation cybernétique, automatisation et rationalité néolibérale** -À partir du milieu des années 1970 se cristallise ce que nous appelons, dans notre cadre théorique, la troisième révolution industrielle. En rupture partielle avec le modèle fordiste — fondé sur l’encastrement étatique de la régulation, la centralisation des compromis sociaux et la massification du travail comme de la consommation — cette époque n’introduit pas seulement de nouvelles technologies : elle transforme la structure même du régime de régulation. +À partir du milieu des années 1970 se cristallise ce que nous appelons, +dans notre cadre théorique, la troisième révolution industrielle. En +rupture partielle avec le modèle fordiste — fondé sur l'encastrement +étatique de la régulation, la centralisation des compromis sociaux et la +massification du travail comme de la consommation — cette époque +n'introduit pas seulement de nouvelles technologies : elle transforme la +structure même du régime de régulation. -Le tournant est généralement situé autour de l’année 1973, non en raison d’un événement technologique spectaculaire, mais du fait d’un basculement systémique : la crise pétrolière marque l’effondrement du modèle keynésien-fordiste, et les premières politiques néolibérales (Chili, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis) commencent à reconfigurer les rapports entre État, marché, entreprise et travail. En parallèle, les innovations issues de la première cybernétique (Norbert Wiener, Claude Shannon, John von Neumann) quittent le domaine de la modélisation militaire ou scientifique pour s’intégrer progressivement aux dispositifs de gouvernance socio-technique. La cybernétique appliquée devient un opérateur politique, en même temps qu’un principe technique d’organisation. +Le tournant est généralement situé autour de l'année 1973, non en raison +d'un événement technologique spectaculaire, mais du fait d'un +basculement systémique : la crise pétrolière marque l'effondrement du +modèle keynésien-fordiste, et les premières politiques néolibérales +(Chili, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis) commencent à reconfigurer les rapports +entre État, marché, entreprise et travail. En parallèle, les innovations +issues de la première cybernétique (Norbert Wiener, Claude Shannon, John +von Neumann) quittent le domaine de la modélisation militaire ou +scientifique pour s'intégrer progressivement aux dispositifs de +gouvernance socio-technique. La cybernétique appliquée devient un +opérateur politique, en même temps qu'un principe technique +d'organisation. -C’est dans cette conjonction — désencastrement étatique et intégration cybernétique — que s’ancre notre hypothèse directrice : la troisième révolution industrielle institue une nouvelle forme de régulation, fondée sur l’autorégulation systémique, l’ajustement par feedback, la gestion informationnelle et la décentralisation automatisée du pilotage. L’arcalité y devient systémique : elle ordonne moins le monde par la norme visible ou la loi explicite que par des structures de flux, des régimes de compatibilité technique et des protocoles d’interopérabilité invisibilisés. La cratialité, quant à elle, se transforme en signalisation généralisée : il ne s’agit plus seulement de discipliner des gestes, mais d’orienter des comportements par des signaux de marché, des incitations locales et des rétroactions algorithmiques. Et l’archicration devient modulaire : elle cesse d’être principalement un pouvoir centralisé et visible, pour se diffuser dans les interfaces, les procédures et les dispositifs de gestion autonomes. +C'est dans cette conjonction — désencastrement étatique et intégration +cybernétique — que s'ancre notre hypothèse directrice : la troisième +révolution industrielle institue une nouvelle forme de régulation, +fondée sur l'autorégulation systémique, l'ajustement par feedback, la +gestion informationnelle et la décentralisation automatisée du pilotage. +L'arcalité y devient systémique : elle ordonne moins le monde par la +norme visible ou la loi explicite que par des structures de flux, des +régimes de compatibilité technique et des protocoles d'interopérabilité +invisibilisés. La cratialité, quant à elle, se transforme en +signalisation généralisée : il ne s'agit plus seulement de discipliner +des gestes, mais d'orienter des comportements par des signaux de marché, +des incitations locales et des rétroactions algorithmiques. Et +l'archicration devient modulaire : elle cesse d'être principalement un +pouvoir centralisé et visible, pour se diffuser dans les interfaces, les +procédures et les dispositifs de gestion autonomes. -Cette période 1973–2015 est donc celle d’un glissement décisif vers une gouvernementalité cybernétique, au sens où le gouvernement du social s’opère de plus en plus via des schèmes issus du contrôle-commande industriel : capter des données, produire des signaux, ajuster des comportements, rétroagir pour stabiliser le système. C’est cette logique — que Michel Foucault entrevoyait déjà dans *Naissance de la biopolitique* (1979), et que Gilles Deleuze a radicalisée dans son texte posthume *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990) — qui structure désormais les formes émergentes de la régulation. +Cette période 1973–2015 est donc celle d'un glissement décisif vers une +gouvernementalité cybernétique, au sens où le gouvernement du social +s'opère de plus en plus via des schèmes issus du contrôle-commande +industriel : capter des données, produire des signaux, ajuster des +comportements, rétroagir pour stabiliser le système. C'est cette logique — que Michel Foucault entrevoyait déjà dans *Naissance de la +biopolitique* (1979), et que Gilles Deleuze a radicalisée dans son texte +posthume *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990) — qui +structure désormais les formes émergentes de la régulation. -Mais cette cybernétisation de la régulation ne se fait pas sans heurts. Car elle s’articule à un projet politique d’ensemble : le néolibéralisme, entendu non comme simple doctrine économique, mais comme forme de rationalité régulatrice, au sens où l’individu, l’entreprise, le travail, la connaissance et même le vivant sont progressivement redéfinis comme *capital à optimiser*. C’est cette requalification ontologique de la réalité par les catégories économiques — *capital humain, capital informationnel, capital attentionnel* — qui permet à la rationalité néolibérale de fonctionner comme un régime archicratique intégrateur : elle rend la norme invisible, mais prescriptive ; elle disperse le commandement, mais renforce sa contrainte. +Mais cette cybernétisation de la régulation ne se fait pas sans heurts. +Car elle s'articule à un projet politique d'ensemble : le +néolibéralisme, entendu non comme simple doctrine économique, mais comme +forme de rationalité régulatrice, au sens où l'individu, l'entreprise, +le travail, la connaissance et même le vivant sont progressivement +redéfinis comme *capital à optimiser*. C'est cette requalification +ontologique de la réalité par les catégories économiques — *capital +humain, capital informationnel, capital attentionnel* — qui permet à +la rationalité néolibérale de fonctionner comme un régime archicratique +intégrateur : elle rend la norme invisible, mais prescriptive ; elle +disperse le commandement, mais renforce sa contrainte. -Enfin, cette période 1973–2015 constitue aussi le laboratoire de la révolution suivante : c’est dans ces années que se préparent les conditions de possibilité de l’*archicration oblitérée*. Car les dispositifs qui y sont mis en place — plateformes numériques, chaînes logistiques automatisées, marchés financiers autorégulés, interfaces comportementales — ouvrent un nouvel âge régulateur, où la scène du pouvoir s’efface dans l’automatisme du protocole. +Enfin, cette période 1973–2015 constitue aussi le laboratoire de la +révolution suivante : c'est dans ces années que se préparent les +conditions de possibilité de l'*archicration oblitérée*. Car les +dispositifs qui y sont mis en place — plateformes numériques, chaînes +logistiques automatisées, marchés financiers autorégulés, interfaces +comportementales — ouvrent un nouvel âge régulateur, où la scène du +pouvoir s'efface dans l'automatisme du protocole. -Nous structurerons cette section en quatre moments fondamentaux, correspondant à la décomposition analytique des régimes régulateurs propres à cette troisième révolution industrielle : +Nous structurerons cette section en quatre moments fondamentaux, +correspondant à la décomposition analytique des régimes régulateurs +propres à cette troisième révolution industrielle : - *Arcalité des systèmes* : automatisation, protocolisation, rétroaction — vers une grammaire continue du monde. -- *Cratialité informationnelle* : signaux, dataflows, filtrage adaptatif — régulation par l’abstraction comportementale. +- *Cratialité informationnelle* : signaux, dataflows, filtrage adaptatif — régulation par l'abstraction comportementale. -- *Archicration dispersée* : désétatisation, gestion par interfaces, rationalité modulaire — émergence d’un pouvoir sans centre. +- *Archicration dispersée* : désétatisation, gestion par interfaces, + rationalité modulaire — émergence d'un pouvoir sans centre. -*Études de cas* : ARPANET, toyotisme, marchés financiers — trois scènes paradigmatiques du basculement cybernétique. +*Études de cas* : ARPANET, toyotisme, marchés financiers — trois +scènes paradigmatiques du basculement cybernétique. -À travers cette architecture, nous poursuivrons notre thèse centrale : l’archicration est un opérateur tensionnel, ni intrinsèquement libérateur ni nécessairement oppressif, mais configuré par les milieux régulateurs. Ici, c’est le système lui-même — autorégulé, automatisé, largement invisibilisé — qui tend à devenir le milieu décisif de la régulation. +À travers cette architecture, nous poursuivrons notre thèse centrale : +l'archicration est un opérateur tensionnel, ni intrinsèquement +libérateur ni nécessairement oppressif, mais configuré par les milieux +régulateurs. Ici, c'est le système lui-même — autorégulé, automatisé, +largement invisibilisé — qui tend à devenir le milieu décisif de la +régulation. ### **4.4.1 — *Arcalité systémique* : feedback, pilotage, protocoles interconnectés** -Le moment cybernétique ne se réduit ni à une révolution technologique ni à une mutation du paradigme scientifique. Il correspond plus profondément à la substitution progressive d’un modèle spatial de la régulation — hérité des logiques territoriales, disciplinaires et juridico-institutionnelles — par un modèle systémique de pilotage, dans lequel le monde est conçu comme un réseau d’interactions informationnelles, de flux modulables et de processus auto-régulés. Cette inflexion engage une reconfiguration complète de l’*arcalité* : celle-ci ne se spatialise plus dans des dispositifs massifs, visibles, mais s’incarne dans des architectures immatérielles, connectées, logiques, où la régulation devient fluide et adaptative. +Le moment cybernétique ne se réduit ni à une révolution technologique ni +à une mutation du paradigme scientifique. Il correspond plus +profondément à la substitution progressive d'un modèle spatial de la +régulation — hérité des logiques territoriales, disciplinaires et +juridico-institutionnelles — par un modèle systémique de pilotage, +dans lequel le monde est conçu comme un réseau d'interactions +informationnelles, de flux modulables et de processus auto-régulés. +Cette inflexion engage une reconfiguration complète de l'*arcalité* : +celle-ci ne se spatialise plus dans des dispositifs massifs, visibles, +mais s'incarne dans des architectures immatérielles, connectées, +logiques, où la régulation devient fluide et adaptative. -La matrice de cette transformation est fournie par la théorie de la régulation cybernétique, formulée par Norbert Wiener dans son ouvrage fondateur *Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine* (1948). Selon Wiener, les systèmes — qu’ils soient biologiques, sociaux ou mécaniques — peuvent être gouvernés non par un commandement extérieur ou une autorité verticale, mais par la rétroaction (feedback) : une information sur l’état du système est captée, analysée, puis utilisée pour modifier son comportement futur. Se constitue ainsi un circuit de contrôle sans centre souverain stable : le pouvoir devient correction continue, et l’ordre procède de l’ajustement. +La matrice de cette transformation est fournie par la théorie de la +régulation cybernétique, formulée par Norbert Wiener dans son ouvrage +fondateur *Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and +the Machine* (1948). Selon Wiener, les systèmes — qu'ils soient +biologiques, sociaux ou mécaniques — peuvent être gouvernés non par un +commandement extérieur ou une autorité verticale, mais par la +rétroaction (feedback) : une information sur l'état du système est +captée, analysée, puis utilisée pour modifier son comportement futur. Se +constitue ainsi un circuit de contrôle sans centre souverain stable : le +pouvoir devient correction continue, et l'ordre procède de l'ajustement. -Cette conceptualisation inaugure une *arcalité* non plus topographique, mais topologique. Elle repose sur trois opérations : capter l’information, modéliser un comportement cible, ajuster automatiquement le système en fonction des écarts constatés. La boucle remplace ici l’organisation spatiale classique, la variable supplante la règle et l’autorité tend à devenir processus. +Cette conceptualisation inaugure une *arcalité* non plus topographique, +mais topologique. Elle repose sur trois opérations : capter +l'information, modéliser un comportement cible, ajuster automatiquement +le système en fonction des écarts constatés. La boucle remplace ici +l'organisation spatiale classique, la variable supplante la règle et +l'autorité tend à devenir processus. -Or, cette modélisation du monde en termes de systèmes rétroactifs n’est pas restée confinée aux laboratoires : elle s’est progressivement diffusée à l’ensemble des sphères organisationnelles et techniques à partir des années 1970. L’*arcalité* devient alors systémique en un sens précis : elle ne se borne plus à organiser des dispositifs visibles de commandement, mais à *configurer des environnements adaptatifs*, dans lesquels les comportements sont régulés par des flux d’information, des signaux, des seuils, des algorithmes, des protocoles. +Or, cette modélisation du monde en termes de systèmes rétroactifs n'est +pas restée confinée aux laboratoires : elle s'est progressivement +diffusée à l'ensemble des sphères organisationnelles et techniques à +partir des années 1970. L'*arcalité* devient alors systémique en un sens +précis : elle ne se borne plus à organiser des dispositifs visibles de +commandement, mais à *configurer des environnements adaptatifs*, dans +lesquels les comportements sont régulés par des flux d'information, des +signaux, des seuils, des algorithmes, des protocoles. -Un exemple emblématique de cette mutation se trouve dans l’émergence du concept de "système sociotechnique", tel qu’il est mobilisé par Thomas P. Hughes (*Networks of Power*, 1983) ou Bruno Latour (*Aramis ou l’amour des techniques*, 1992). Ces auteurs montrent que les technologies modernes ne se contentent pas de supporter des usages : elles reconfigurent activement les relations sociales, les hiérarchies et les flux de décision, non en imposant des règles explicites, mais en rendant possibles certaines actions et en en empêchant d’autres par des biais de conception, des protocoles intégrés et des logiques de design. +Un exemple emblématique de cette mutation se trouve dans l'émergence du +concept de "système sociotechnique", tel qu'il est mobilisé par Thomas +P. Hughes (*Networks of Power*, 1983) ou Bruno Latour (*Aramis ou +l'amour des techniques*, 1992). Ces auteurs montrent que les +technologies modernes ne se contentent pas de supporter des usages : +elles reconfigurent activement les relations sociales, les hiérarchies +et les flux de décision, non en imposant des règles explicites, mais en +rendant possibles certaines actions et en en empêchant d'autres par des +biais de conception, des protocoles intégrés et des logiques de design. -La cybernétique devient ainsi une matrice opératoire : elle ne se contente pas de modéliser le réel, elle en redéfinit la structure. Le monde devient *pilotable*, *prévisible*, *modélisable* — et donc régulable non plus par autorité, mais par anticipation. L’*arcalité*, dans ce cadre, ne régule plus l’espace — elle régule les conditions d’interopérabilité des systèmes. Ce n’est plus le territoire qui fait loi, mais le protocole. +La cybernétique devient ainsi une matrice opératoire : elle ne se +contente pas de modéliser le réel, elle en redéfinit la structure. Le +monde devient *pilotable*, *prévisible*, *modélisable* — et donc +régulable non plus par autorité, mais par anticipation. L'*arcalité*, +dans ce cadre, ne régule plus l'espace — elle régule les conditions +d'interopérabilité des systèmes. Ce n'est plus le territoire qui fait +loi, mais le protocole. -C’est ce renversement fondamental que nous allons explorer à travers l’analyse des infrastructures interconnectées, des architectures distribuées et des cas paradigmatiques comme ARPANET. Mais dès à présent, nous devons souligner ce point décisif : la troisième révolution industrielle inaugure une arcalité fluide, dans laquelle le pouvoir commande moins qu’il n’ajuste et module à partir de données remontées, d’analyses probabilistes et de rétroactions. +C'est ce renversement fondamental que nous allons explorer à travers +l'analyse des infrastructures interconnectées, des architectures +distribuées et des cas paradigmatiques comme ARPANET. Mais dès à +présent, nous devons souligner ce point décisif : la troisième +révolution industrielle inaugure une arcalité fluide, dans laquelle le +pouvoir commande moins qu'il n'ajuste et module à partir de données +remontées, d'analyses probabilistes et de rétroactions. -L’un des renversements les plus importants de la troisième révolution industrielle réside dans la transition d’une arcalité centralisée à une arcalité interconnectée, orchestrée par une architecture de protocoles techniques agissant comme nouvelles matrices de régulation. Là où le pouvoir moderne opérait encore par spatialisation, maillage, quadrillage et disciplinarisation (cf. Foucault, *Surveiller et punir*, 1975), la régulation cybernétique recompose les modalités de gouvernement à travers des standards rendus invisibles et des couches techniques d’abstraction qui déterminent en profondeur les formes d’accès, de circulation, d’identification, d’autorisation. +L'un des renversements les plus importants de la troisième révolution +industrielle réside dans la transition d'une arcalité centralisée à une +arcalité interconnectée, orchestrée par une architecture de protocoles +techniques agissant comme nouvelles matrices de régulation. Là où le +pouvoir moderne opérait encore par spatialisation, maillage, quadrillage +et disciplinarisation (cf. Foucault, *Surveiller et punir*, 1975), la +régulation cybernétique recompose les modalités de gouvernement à +travers des standards rendus invisibles et des couches techniques +d'abstraction qui déterminent en profondeur les formes d'accès, de +circulation, d'identification, d'autorisation. -L’espace régulatoire cesse alors d’être cartographiable selon des lignes, des territoires ou des juridictions. Il devient *systémique* : il s’organise en réseaux logiques, en adresses IP, en chemins de données, en nœuds de transit, en interfaces protocolaires. Autrement dit, la norme n’est plus le produit d’un commandement explicite — elle est codée dans l’architecture. Comme l’analyse Alexander Galloway dans *Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization* (2004), les protocoles de communication — tels que TCP/IP, HTTP, DNS, SMTP, FTP — ne sont pas de simples outils neutres : ce sont des formes opératoires de pouvoir. Ils contraignent, orientent, structurent l’espace numérique. Ils rendent certaines opérations possibles et d’autres impossibles. Ils gouvernent sans apparaître comme gouvernants. +L'espace régulatoire cesse alors d'être cartographiable selon des +lignes, des territoires ou des juridictions. Il devient *systémique* : +il s'organise en réseaux logiques, en adresses IP, en chemins de +données, en nœuds de transit, en interfaces protocolaires. Autrement +dit, la norme n'est plus le produit d'un commandement explicite — elle +est codée dans l'architecture. Comme l'analyse Alexander Galloway dans +*Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization* (2004), les +protocoles de communication — tels que TCP/IP, HTTP, DNS, SMTP, FTP — ne sont pas de simples outils neutres : ce sont des formes +opératoires de pouvoir. Ils contraignent, orientent, structurent +l'espace numérique. Ils rendent certaines opérations possibles et +d'autres impossibles. Ils gouvernent sans apparaître comme gouvernants. -Prenons l’exemple fondamental du protocole TCP/IP, standardisé dès 1983 dans les réseaux militaires et universitaires de l’ARPANET, puis imposé à l’ensemble des infrastructures numériques. Ce protocole n’est pas simplement un moyen de transmission : il définit la manière dont les paquets de données sont segmentés, adressés, acheminés, réassemblés. Il organise ainsi la logique même de la communication entre machines, en conditionnant la possibilité de toute connexion. Dans un tel régime, *être connecté* signifie *adhérer à un protocole* ; et *adhérer à un protocole*, c’est *accepter une architecture normative implicite*, dans laquelle la liberté de circulation repose sur des formats imposés, sur des règles de compatibilité non négociables. Le protocole devient ici une norme soustraite au débat. +Prenons l'exemple fondamental du protocole TCP/IP, standardisé dès 1983 +dans les réseaux militaires et universitaires de l'ARPANET, puis imposé +à l'ensemble des infrastructures numériques. Ce protocole n'est pas +simplement un moyen de transmission : il définit la manière dont les +paquets de données sont segmentés, adressés, acheminés, réassemblés. Il +organise ainsi la logique même de la communication entre machines, en +conditionnant la possibilité de toute connexion. Dans un tel régime, +*être connecté* signifie *adhérer à un protocole* ; et *adhérer à un +protocole*, c'est *accepter une architecture normative implicite*, dans +laquelle la liberté de circulation repose sur des formats imposés, sur +des règles de compatibilité non négociables. Le protocole devient ici +une norme soustraite au débat. -Il faut souligner avec force que cette arcalité des systèmes ne repose pas sur la visibilité du pouvoir, mais sur sa dissimulation dans les couches basses de l’infrastructure. Les utilisateurs ne voient pas TCP/IP, ils n’interagissent pas directement avec le DNS, ils n’ont aucune prise sur la hiérarchie des autorisations SSL ou sur les règles de routage BGP. Ce que Benjamin Bratton nommera plus tard *the Stack* (*The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty*, 2016) — c’est-à-dire cet empilement de couches computationnelles — constitue la nouvelle scène de la régulation. +Il faut souligner avec force que cette arcalité des systèmes ne repose +pas sur la visibilité du pouvoir, mais sur sa dissimulation dans les +couches basses de l'infrastructure. Les utilisateurs ne voient pas +TCP/IP, ils n'interagissent pas directement avec le DNS, ils n'ont +aucune prise sur la hiérarchie des autorisations SSL ou sur les règles +de routage BGP. Ce que Benjamin Bratton nommera plus tard *the Stack* +(*The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty*, 2016) — c'est-à-dire cet +empilement de couches computationnelles — constitue la nouvelle scène +de la régulation. -Ce déplacement a une conséquence majeure sur notre conception de la régulation archique. Là où, dans les régimes modernes, la norme était justifiée par une autorité politique (État, souverain, législateur), dans les régimes cybernétiques post-1973, la norme est justifiée par l’efficacité technique, par la compatibilité systémique, par la fluidité transactionnelle. Elle ne formule plus un impératif explicite ; elle impose un format requis. Ce que l’on nomme désormais "interopérabilité" est en fait une hégémonie douce du protocole. Il n’est plus nécessaire d’imposer explicitement : il suffit d’exiger la compatibilité. +Ce déplacement a une conséquence majeure sur notre conception de la +régulation archique. Là où, dans les régimes modernes, la norme était +justifiée par une autorité politique (État, souverain, législateur), +dans les régimes cybernétiques post-1973, la norme est justifiée par +l'efficacité technique, par la compatibilité systémique, par la fluidité +transactionnelle. Elle ne formule plus un impératif explicite ; elle +impose un format requis. Ce que l'on nomme désormais "interopérabilité" +est en fait une hégémonie douce du protocole. Il n'est plus nécessaire +d'imposer explicitement : il suffit d'exiger la compatibilité. -C’est dans ce sens que la troisième révolution industrielle doit être analysée comme le moment de la reconfiguration silencieuse du pouvoir régulateur par les standards techniques. L’arcalité devient principalement protocolaire. Ce n’est plus d’abord l’espace physique qui est régulé, mais le champ des possibles logiques. Le pouvoir n’intervient plus sur les actes, mais sur les interfaces, sur les accès, sur les filtres de circulation. Il interdit moins frontalement qu’il ne préformate les conditions de l’action, en redéfinissant ce qui peut être adressé et circuler. +C'est dans ce sens que la troisième révolution industrielle doit être +analysée comme le moment de la reconfiguration silencieuse du pouvoir +régulateur par les standards techniques. L'arcalité devient +principalement protocolaire. Ce n'est plus d'abord l'espace physique qui +est régulé, mais le champ des possibles logiques. Le pouvoir +n'intervient plus sur les actes, mais sur les interfaces, sur les accès, +sur les filtres de circulation. Il interdit moins frontalement qu'il ne +préformate les conditions de l'action, en redéfinissant ce qui peut être +adressé et circuler. -Nous allons voir comment cette *arcalité protocolaire* s’accompagne d’une *cratialité informationnelle*, dans laquelle les signaux, les flux de données, les micro-décisions deviennent les nouveaux opérateurs du pouvoir, avant d’analyser l’émergence de l’archicration dispersée et algorithmique. Mais déjà, ce second bloc nous permet d’affirmer ceci : la régulation cybernétique ne gouverne plus principalement des corps dans l’espace ; elle gouverne aussi, et de plus en plus, des paquets dans un réseau. Elle ne contrôle plus seulement l’action visible ; elle module les possibilités d’action à travers des formes de régulation invisibilisées et potentiellement totalisantes. +Nous allons voir comment cette *arcalité protocolaire* s'accompagne +d'une *cratialité informationnelle*, dans laquelle les signaux, les flux +de données, les micro-décisions deviennent les nouveaux opérateurs du +pouvoir, avant d'analyser l'émergence de l'archicration dispersée et +algorithmique. Mais déjà, ce second bloc nous permet d'affirmer ceci : +la régulation cybernétique ne gouverne plus principalement des corps +dans l'espace ; elle gouverne aussi, et de plus en plus, des paquets +dans un réseau. Elle ne contrôle plus seulement l'action visible ; elle +module les possibilités d'action à travers des formes de régulation +invisibilisées et potentiellement totalisantes. -Si les protocoles interconnectés structurent l’arcalité systémique, ils impliquent une reconfiguration plus radicale encore : celle d’une *gouvernance distribuée*, non plus articulée autour d’un centre identifiable, mais éclatée dans une multiplicité de nœuds, de dispositifs et de régimes algorithmiques. Ce que la troisième révolution industrielle opère n’est pas un simple changement de technologie : c’est un basculement du *mode même* d'exercice du pouvoir, qui se déterritorialise, se redistribue, tout en se perfectionnant dans ses modalités de pilotage. +Si les protocoles interconnectés structurent l'arcalité systémique, ils +impliquent une reconfiguration plus radicale encore : celle d'une +*gouvernance distribuée*, non plus articulée autour d'un centre +identifiable, mais éclatée dans une multiplicité de nœuds, de +dispositifs et de régimes algorithmiques. Ce que la troisième révolution +industrielle opère n'est pas un simple changement de technologie : c'est +un basculement du *mode même* d'exercice du pouvoir, qui se +déterritorialise, se redistribue, tout en se perfectionnant dans ses +modalités de pilotage. -Ce renversement se produit selon une dynamique paradoxale : d’une part, l’autorité politique classique se retire, en particulier sous l’effet des inflexions néolibérales issues des années 1980, incarnées notamment par les politiques de dérégulation, de désintermédiation et de réduction de la dépense publique, tandis que, d’autre part, le pouvoir normatif ne disparaît nullement mais migre vers des structures décentrées, souvent techniques, qui assurent une régulation à incarnation politique de plus en plus effacée. C’est précisément cette *disparition apparente du pouvoir* qui en assure la pérennité renouvelée. Comme l’analysait Gilles Deleuze dans son célèbre *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990), nous passons d’une société des disciplines à une société des contrôles continus : "l’entreprise remplace l’usine, l’école devient réseau, le pouvoir devient modulateur". +Ce renversement se produit selon une dynamique paradoxale : d'une part, +l'autorité politique classique se retire, en particulier sous l'effet +des inflexions néolibérales issues des années 1980, incarnées notamment +par les politiques de dérégulation, de désintermédiation et de réduction +de la dépense publique, tandis que, d'autre part, le pouvoir normatif ne +disparaît nullement mais migre vers des structures décentrées, souvent +techniques, qui assurent une régulation à incarnation politique de plus +en plus effacée. C'est précisément cette *disparition apparente du +pouvoir* qui en assure la pérennité renouvelée. Comme l'analysait Gilles +Deleuze dans son célèbre *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* +(1990), nous passons d'une société des disciplines à une société des +contrôles continus : "l'entreprise remplace l'usine, l'école devient +réseau, le pouvoir devient modulateur". -Dans ce régime, la *gouvernance* n’est plus nécessairement exercée par des institutions centralisées (gouvernements, administrations, parlements), mais par des *architectures techniques* et *systèmes décentralisés* qui articulent des normes, des données, des logiques de compatibilité. Ce que Michel Foucault appelait "gouvernementalité" se transforme : elle ne s’exerce plus par institutions, mais par "agencements" (au sens deleuzien), par systèmes dynamiques, réactifs, adaptatifs. Il faut ici convoquer la notion de régulation algorithmique — ou ce que certains nommeront plus tard gouvernance par le code (cf. Lessig, *Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace*, 1999) : le droit tend à être relayé par le code source, la sanction par le refus d’accès, et la délibération par l’automatisation. +Dans ce régime, la *gouvernance* n'est plus nécessairement exercée par +des institutions centralisées (gouvernements, administrations, +parlements), mais par des *architectures techniques* et *systèmes +décentralisés* qui articulent des normes, des données, des logiques de +compatibilité. Ce que Michel Foucault appelait "gouvernementalité" se +transforme : elle ne s'exerce plus par institutions, mais par +"agencements" (au sens deleuzien), par systèmes dynamiques, réactifs, +adaptatifs. Il faut ici convoquer la notion de régulation algorithmique — ou ce que certains nommeront plus tard gouvernance par le code +(cf. Lessig, *Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace*, 1999) : le droit tend +à être relayé par le code source, la sanction par le refus d'accès, et +la délibération par l'automatisation. -Ce déplacement du pouvoir vers des structures distribuées s'accompagne d’une déterritorialisation profonde de la régulation. Là où les régimes modernes articulaient souveraineté et territoire, pouvoir et frontières, légalité et juridiction, les dispositifs contemporains de régulation s’affranchissent des ancrages géographiques. Un service, un flux, un ordre algorithmique peut être *opérationnellement universel* tout en étant *juridiquement nulle part*. La structure DNS, par exemple — hiérarchie logique d’adresses réparties dans l’espace mondial — n’obéit à aucune souveraineté étatique pleine, tout en structurant une large part de l'accès à l'information planétaire. Il en va de même des clouds, services distribués, blockchains ou réseaux pair-à-pair, qui incarnent une forme de souveraineté technique sans souverain explicite. +Ce déplacement du pouvoir vers des structures distribuées s'accompagne +d'une déterritorialisation profonde de la régulation. Là où les régimes +modernes articulaient souveraineté et territoire, pouvoir et frontières, +légalité et juridiction, les dispositifs contemporains de régulation +s'affranchissent des ancrages géographiques. Un service, un flux, un +ordre algorithmique peut être *opérationnellement universel* tout en +étant *juridiquement nulle part*. La structure DNS, par exemple — hiérarchie logique d'adresses réparties dans l'espace mondial — n'obéit à aucune souveraineté étatique pleine, tout en structurant une +large part de l'accès à l'information planétaire. Il en va de même des +clouds, services distribués, blockchains ou réseaux pair-à-pair, qui +incarnent une forme de souveraineté technique sans souverain explicite. -Ce phénomène a été puissamment conceptualisé par Saskia Sassen dans *Territory, Authority, Rights* (2006), qui montre comment les dispositifs globaux — financiers, informatiques, logistiques — redéfinissent l’exercice de l’autorité indépendamment du cadre national. Elle parle d’assemblages globaux qui recomposent les modalités d’inclusion et d’exclusion en fonction non plus du lieu, mais de l’appartenance à un système interconnecté. Être régulé, désormais, ce n’est plus seulement vivre sous une loi territoriale : c’est être pris dans un graphe logique, une matrice d’accès, un système de compatibilité. +Ce phénomène a été puissamment conceptualisé par Saskia Sassen dans +*Territory, Authority, Rights* (2006), qui montre comment les +dispositifs globaux — financiers, informatiques, logistiques — redéfinissent l'exercice de l'autorité indépendamment du cadre national. +Elle parle d'assemblages globaux qui recomposent les modalités +d'inclusion et d'exclusion en fonction non plus du lieu, mais de +l'appartenance à un système interconnecté. Être régulé, désormais, ce +n'est plus seulement vivre sous une loi territoriale : c'est être pris +dans un graphe logique, une matrice d'accès, un système de +compatibilité. -Dans cette perspective, la notion même de "centre" du pouvoir perd sa pertinence. Comme l’a bien souligné Manuel Castells dans *The Rise of the Network Society* (1996), nous entrons dans une configuration de pouvoir sans centre fixe, dans laquelle les positions dominantes dépendent des connexions, des capacités de traitement de l’information et de l’accès aux données stratégiques. Cette logique est observable dans l’infrastructure d’Internet, dans la gouvernance des multinationales, dans la structuration des places financières, mais aussi dans la circulation des données personnelles, médicales, bancaires, administratives. +Dans cette perspective, la notion même de "centre" du pouvoir perd sa +pertinence. Comme l'a bien souligné Manuel Castells dans *The Rise of +the Network Society* (1996), nous entrons dans une configuration de +pouvoir sans centre fixe, dans laquelle les positions dominantes +dépendent des connexions, des capacités de traitement de l'information +et de l'accès aux données stratégiques. Cette logique est observable +dans l'infrastructure d'Internet, dans la gouvernance des +multinationales, dans la structuration des places financières, mais +aussi dans la circulation des données personnelles, médicales, +bancaires, administratives. -Et c’est là que l’*arcalité systémique* révèle sa face métapolitique : elle configure des régimes d’inclusion/exclusion, sans que ceux-ci soient nécessairement visibles ou revendiqués comme tels. Il n’est plus besoin d’interdire formellement un comportement : il suffit qu’il ne soit pas *interopérable* avec les standards du système. Le pouvoir devient *invisible parce qu’infra-logique*. Il ne passe pas par l’autorité d’un souverain, mais par les opérateurs de compatibilité : ports ouverts, formats de fichier, couches d’authentification, adresses acceptées, réponses autorisées. Il n’est plus tant imposé qu’intégré à l’architecture même du système. +Et c'est là que l'*arcalité systémique* révèle sa face métapolitique : +elle configure des régimes d'inclusion/exclusion, sans que ceux-ci +soient nécessairement visibles ou revendiqués comme tels. Il n'est plus +besoin d'interdire formellement un comportement : il suffit qu'il ne +soit pas *interopérable* avec les standards du système. Le pouvoir +devient *invisible parce qu'infra-logique*. Il ne passe pas par +l'autorité d'un souverain, mais par les opérateurs de compatibilité : +ports ouverts, formats de fichier, couches d'authentification, adresses +acceptées, réponses autorisées. Il n'est plus tant imposé qu'intégré à +l'architecture même du système. -Dans ce contexte, il nous faut affirmer une thèse centrale : la déterritorialisation du pouvoir ne produit pas sa disparition — elle en produit une forme de perfectionnement structurel. C’est précisément *parce que le pouvoir n’a plus besoin d’être localisé* qu’il peut se diffuser, s'infiltrer, s’étendre. L’archicration systémique, loin d’être atténuée, est au contraire amplifiée par sa distribution. Elle repose moins sur la coercition visible que sur l’architecture même du réel. +Dans ce contexte, il nous faut affirmer une thèse centrale : la +déterritorialisation du pouvoir ne produit pas sa disparition — elle +en produit une forme de perfectionnement structurel. C'est précisément +*parce que le pouvoir n'a plus besoin d'être localisé* qu'il peut se +diffuser, s'infiltrer, s'étendre. L'archicration systémique, loin d'être +atténuée, est au contraire amplifiée par sa distribution. Elle repose +moins sur la coercition visible que sur l'architecture même du réel. -L’entrée dans l’ère de l’*arcalité systémique* trouve une manifestation paradigmatique dans la genèse d’ARPANET, premier réseau informatique à commutation de paquets, conçu dès 1969 par l’ARPA (Advanced Research Projects Agency) du Département de la Défense des États-Unis. ARPANET ne fut pas un simple projet technologique : il constitua le prototype d’une nouvelle forme d’infrastructure régulatoire, fondée sur la logique des protocoles, une architecture distribuée et la capacité à maintenir la résilience du commandement même en situation de guerre nucléaire. +L'entrée dans l'ère de l'*arcalité systémique* trouve une manifestation +paradigmatique dans la genèse d'ARPANET, premier réseau informatique à +commutation de paquets, conçu dès 1969 par l'ARPA (Advanced Research +Projects Agency) du Département de la Défense des États-Unis. ARPANET ne +fut pas un simple projet technologique : il constitua le prototype d'une +nouvelle forme d'infrastructure régulatoire, fondée sur la logique des +protocoles, une architecture distribuée et la capacité à maintenir la +résilience du commandement même en situation de guerre nucléaire. -Ce point est décisif. Car derrière l’apparente neutralité de l’innovation technique se dessine une transformation radicale de la *gouvernabilité*. Là où l’État moderne régulait par centralisation hiérarchique (archives, chaînes de commandement, capitales administratives), ARPANET inaugure un modèle de robustesse par décentralisation : plus aucun centre n’est nécessaire pour que l’ensemble fonctionne. Le pouvoir se distribue dans l’architecture du réseau. +Ce point est décisif. Car derrière l'apparente neutralité de +l'innovation technique se dessine une transformation radicale de la +*gouvernabilité*. Là où l'État moderne régulait par centralisation +hiérarchique (archives, chaînes de commandement, capitales +administratives), ARPANET inaugure un modèle de robustesse par +décentralisation : plus aucun centre n'est nécessaire pour que +l'ensemble fonctionne. Le pouvoir se distribue dans l'architecture du +réseau. -L’adoption du modèle de commutation de paquets, en lieu et place du routage linéaire, permet une reconfiguration permanente des chemins de circulation de l’information. Cette plasticité topologique produit une arcalité inédite, qui ne repose plus sur la fixité des points (villes, institutions, lieux de pouvoir), mais sur la fluidité des flux. Ce que Paul Baran avait théorisé dès 1964 pour la RAND Corporation — la "survivabilité du réseau" — devient la nouvelle loi matérielle de l’ordre politique cybernétique : tout nœud peut être désactivé, tant que l’architecture logique demeure intacte. +L'adoption du modèle de commutation de paquets, en lieu et place du +routage linéaire, permet une reconfiguration permanente des chemins de +circulation de l'information. Cette plasticité topologique produit une +arcalité inédite, qui ne repose plus sur la fixité des points (villes, +institutions, lieux de pouvoir), mais sur la fluidité des flux. Ce que +Paul Baran avait théorisé dès 1964 pour la RAND Corporation — la +"survivabilité du réseau" — devient la nouvelle loi matérielle de +l'ordre politique cybernétique : tout nœud peut être désactivé, tant que +l'architecture logique demeure intacte. -La standardisation progressive des protocoles de communication en constitue la matrice normative. En particulier, le développement du TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol), officialisé comme standard de l’ARPANET en janvier 1983, produit une couche de compatibilité universelle qui abolit de facto la souveraineté technique des infrastructures. À partir de ce moment, tout système conforme au protocole peut s’interconnecter, s’adresser, circuler dans le même espace logique. +La standardisation progressive des protocoles de communication en +constitue la matrice normative. En particulier, le développement du +TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol), officialisé +comme standard de l'ARPANET en janvier 1983, produit une couche de +compatibilité universelle qui abolit de facto la souveraineté technique +des infrastructures. À partir de ce moment, tout système conforme au +protocole peut s'interconnecter, s'adresser, circuler dans le même +espace logique. -C’est ici qu’apparaît une archicration par standardisation invisible. Le protocole TCP/IP, tout comme le système de domain name system (DNS) instauré en 1984, opèrent comme normes techniques globales, mais sans jamais passer par une ratification politique formelle. Aucun parlement, aucun traité, aucune convention démocratique n’a validé la suprématie de TCP/IP : elle s’est *imposée par effet de réseau*, par *efficience systémique*, par *logique de propagation virale*. Comme le montrera plus tard Benjamin Bratton dans *The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty* (2016), nous sommes entrés dans une ère où une part croissante de la souveraineté se code en architecture logicielle — et non plus seulement en Constitution. +C'est ici qu'apparaît une archicration par standardisation invisible. Le +protocole TCP/IP, tout comme le système de domain name system (DNS) +instauré en 1984, opèrent comme normes techniques globales, mais sans +jamais passer par une ratification politique formelle. Aucun parlement, +aucun traité, aucune convention démocratique n'a validé la suprématie de +TCP/IP : elle s'est *imposée par effet de réseau*, par *efficience +systémique*, par *logique de propagation virale*. Comme le montrera plus +tard Benjamin Bratton dans *The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty* +(2016), nous sommes entrés dans une ère où une part croissante de la +souveraineté se code en architecture logicielle — et non plus +seulement en Constitution. -De ce point de vue, Internet, hérité d’ARPANET mais étendu à l’échelle planétaire à partir des années 1990, ne constitue pas une "société de l’information" au sens mou du terme. Il constitue une *machinerie régulatoire mondiale*, dans laquelle les normes ne sont plus *déclarées*, mais *implémentées*. C’est là toute la force — mais aussi toute l’opacité — de cette nouvelle *arcalité systémique* : elle fonctionne *sans institution visible*, *sans organe de souveraineté explicite*, *sans coercition manifeste*. Elle régule parce qu’elle fait fonctionner. +De ce point de vue, Internet, hérité d'ARPANET mais étendu à l'échelle +planétaire à partir des années 1990, ne constitue pas une "société de +l'information" au sens mou du terme. Il constitue une *machinerie +régulatoire mondiale*, dans laquelle les normes ne sont plus +*déclarées*, mais *implémentées*. C'est là toute la force — mais aussi +toute l'opacité — de cette nouvelle *arcalité systémique* : elle +fonctionne *sans institution visible*, *sans organe de souveraineté +explicite*, *sans coercition manifeste*. Elle régule parce qu'elle fait +fonctionner. -Les couches logicielles du cyberespace deviennent alors des strates normatives imbriquées, que l’utilisateur traverse sans les voir : couches physiques (câbles, serveurs), couches protocolaires (IP, DNS), couches applicatives (HTTP, SMTP), couches commerciales (plateformes, services), couches culturelles (interfaces, design, habitus numériques). À chaque niveau correspond un degré d’encodage de la régulation. Et plus on descend vers les *couches basses*, plus le pouvoir devient opaque, automatique, impensé. +Les couches logicielles du cyberespace deviennent alors des strates +normatives imbriquées, que l'utilisateur traverse sans les voir : +couches physiques (câbles, serveurs), couches protocolaires (IP, DNS), +couches applicatives (HTTP, SMTP), couches commerciales (plateformes, +services), couches culturelles (interfaces, design, habitus numériques). +À chaque niveau correspond un degré d'encodage de la régulation. Et plus +on descend vers les *couches basses*, plus le pouvoir devient opaque, +automatique, impensé. -Ce glissement a été analysé par Lawrence Lessig dans une formule désormais canonique : *code is law* ("le code est la loi"). Mais il faut aller plus loin : le *code* n’est pas seulement une norme. Il est une *forme active de gouvernement*. Il détermine ce qui est possible, ce qui est accessible, ce qui est mesuré, ce qui est monétisé. Il produit donc une *arcalité* *invisible mais prescriptive*, dans laquelle les trajectoires des usagers sont balisées, filtrées, régulées par des règles techniques inamovibles. +Ce glissement a été analysé par Lawrence Lessig dans une formule +désormais canonique : *code is law* ("le code est la loi"). Mais il faut +aller plus loin : le *code* n'est pas seulement une norme. Il est une +*forme active de gouvernement*. Il détermine ce qui est possible, ce qui +est accessible, ce qui est mesuré, ce qui est monétisé. Il produit donc +une *arcalité* *invisible mais prescriptive*, dans laquelle les +trajectoires des usagers sont balisées, filtrées, régulées par des +règles techniques inamovibles. -Ce nouveau régime atteint une intensité maximale à partir des années 2000, avec la montée en puissance des géants du numérique (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft) : chacun d’eux devient un *opérateur d’arcalité systémique privée*, imposant ses *propres standards de compatibilité*, ses *propres logiques d’accès*, ses *propres architectures de données*. L’espace public bascule dans un environnement régulé par plateformes, qui ne sont plus des canaux publics mais des *milieux régulatoires privés*. +Ce nouveau régime atteint une intensité maximale à partir des années +2000, avec la montée en puissance des géants du numérique (Google, +Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft) : chacun d'eux devient un *opérateur +d'arcalité systémique privée*, imposant ses *propres standards de +compatibilité*, ses *propres logiques d'accès*, ses *propres +architectures de données*. L'espace public bascule dans un environnement +régulé par plateformes, qui ne sont plus des canaux publics mais des +*milieux régulatoires privés*. -Il faut donc affirmer que l’Internet n’est pas un espace libre au sens fort du terme. Il est le vecteur d’une *arcalité systémique totale*, dont la régulation repose sur la *logique des protocoles*, l’*universalité des standards*, l’*invisibilité des couches techniques*, et l’*intériorisation des contraintes*. *Ce n’est plus la loi qui ordonne : c’est la structure logique qui rend possible — ou impossible.* +Il faut donc affirmer que l'Internet n'est pas un espace libre au sens +fort du terme. Il est le vecteur d'une *arcalité systémique totale*, +dont la régulation repose sur la *logique des protocoles*, +l'*universalité des standards*, l'*invisibilité des couches techniques*, +et l'*intériorisation des contraintes*. *Ce n'est plus la loi qui +ordonne : c'est la structure logique qui rend possible — ou +impossible.* -Cette section permet ainsi de poser les bases de la régulation cybernétique comme régime de pouvoir dispersé mais efficace, non localisé mais prescriptif, invisible mais agissant. +Cette section permet ainsi de poser les bases de la régulation +cybernétique comme régime de pouvoir dispersé mais efficace, non +localisé mais prescriptif, invisible mais agissant. ### **4.4.2 — Cratialité informationnelle : données, signaux, flux décisionnels** -Le tournant informationnel de la cratialité ne s’explique pas par de simples avancées techniques isolées, mais par une reconfiguration profonde de la manière dont le pouvoir se matérialise, s’organise et s’exerce. Là où la cratialité industrielle reposait sur l’organisation physique des forces de travail, des matières et des territoires, la période post-fordienne engage un déplacement de la puissance vers l’abstraction opérationnelle des données : la force n’est plus d’abord appliquée aux corps ; elle est calculée, anticipée et orchestrée à distance à travers l’information. +Le tournant informationnel de la cratialité ne s'explique pas par de +simples avancées techniques isolées, mais par une reconfiguration +profonde de la manière dont le pouvoir se matérialise, s'organise et +s'exerce. Là où la cratialité industrielle reposait sur l'organisation +physique des forces de travail, des matières et des territoires, la +période post-fordienne engage un déplacement de la puissance vers +l'abstraction opérationnelle des données : la force n'est plus d'abord +appliquée aux corps ; elle est calculée, anticipée et orchestrée à +distance à travers l'information. -C’est dans les années 1950–1970 que cette mutation prend forme. La montée en puissance des *mainframes* (IBM 360, UNIVAC), conçus à l’origine pour la gestion militaire et les opérations comptables, donne naissance à une nouvelle architecture de traitement informationnel comme outil de commandement. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de stocker ou de transmettre des données, mais de les organiser comme support d’action. La donnée devient opératoire. Et cette opérationalité repose sur une modélisation des réalités sociales, économiques ou techniques en variables discrètes, quantifiables, comparables, ajustables par itération. +C'est dans les années 1950–1970 que cette mutation prend forme. La +montée en puissance des *mainframes* (IBM 360, UNIVAC), conçus à +l'origine pour la gestion militaire et les opérations comptables, donne +naissance à une nouvelle architecture de traitement informationnel comme +outil de commandement. Il ne s'agit plus seulement de stocker ou de +transmettre des données, mais de les organiser comme support d'action. +La donnée devient opératoire. Et cette opérationalité repose sur une +modélisation des réalités sociales, économiques ou techniques en +variables discrètes, quantifiables, comparables, ajustables par +itération. -Ce processus est déjà en germe dans les modèles militaires du commandement automatisé. Le système SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground Environment), développé par les États-Unis dès les années 1950 pour la coordination des radars anti-aériens, repose sur une boucle de captation – traitement – réponse instantanée. Chaque décision est le résultat d’une synthèse computationnelle de signaux d’entrée, calibrés et priorisés par des logiciels. L’humain n’est plus l’opérateur principal : il se transforme en auxiliaire d’un système décisionnel automatisé. +Ce processus est déjà en germe dans les modèles militaires du +commandement automatisé. Le système SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground +Environment), développé par les États-Unis dès les années 1950 pour la +coordination des radars anti-aériens, repose sur une boucle de captation — traitement — réponse instantanée. Chaque décision est le résultat +d'une synthèse computationnelle de signaux d'entrée, calibrés et +priorisés par des logiciels. L'humain n'est plus l'opérateur principal : +il se transforme en auxiliaire d'un système décisionnel automatisé. -C’est ici que se noue un basculement fondamental : la force apparaît de plus en plus comme l’effet d’un processus de décision modulaire, fondé sur la transformation des signaux en actions stratégiques. Les sociétés civiles adoptent rapidement ces modèles. Dans le domaine de la gestion publique comme dans celui de la grande entreprise, l’analyse statistique devient un opérateur central de gouvernementalité. La modélisation des flux commerciaux, des déplacements de population, des dynamiques budgétaires, des performances de production, est désormais confiée à des systèmes d’information managériale, conçus pour traduire la complexité en grilles décisionnelles. +C'est ici que se noue un basculement fondamental : la force apparaît de +plus en plus comme l'effet d'un processus de décision modulaire, fondé +sur la transformation des signaux en actions stratégiques. Les sociétés +civiles adoptent rapidement ces modèles. Dans le domaine de la gestion +publique comme dans celui de la grande entreprise, l'analyse statistique +devient un opérateur central de gouvernementalité. La modélisation des +flux commerciaux, des déplacements de population, des dynamiques +budgétaires, des performances de production, est désormais confiée à des +systèmes d'information managériale, conçus pour traduire la complexité +en grilles décisionnelles. -C’est dans ce contexte qu’émergent les premiers Systèmes d’Aide à la Décision (Decision Support Systems) dans les années 1970, puis les Systèmes d’Information de Gestion (MIS), qui permettront dans les décennies suivantes la constitution des *Enterprise Resource Planning* (ERP). Ces architectures computationnelles instaurent un nouveau régime de pouvoir : la centralisation décisionnelle sans centralité spatiale. Le pouvoir agit par agrégation synchrone de signaux plutôt que par instruction verticale. +C'est dans ce contexte qu'émergent les premiers Systèmes d'Aide à la +Décision (Decision Support Systems) dans les années 1970, puis les +Systèmes d'Information de Gestion (MIS), qui permettront dans les +décennies suivantes la constitution des *Enterprise Resource Planning* +(ERP). Ces architectures computationnelles instaurent un nouveau régime +de pouvoir : la centralisation décisionnelle sans centralité spatiale. +Le pouvoir agit par agrégation synchrone de signaux plutôt que par +instruction verticale. -Il faut ici convoquer la pensée de Claude Shannon, qui dans sa *Théorie mathématique de la communication* (1948), posait que tout message peut être analysé comme une séquence d’unités discrètes (bits), où seule compte la capacité de transmettre sans bruit. Mais la force de cette théorie réside moins dans sa dimension technique que dans son impact conceptuel : elle permet de penser la réalité sociale comme un ensemble de signaux transmissibles, comparables et ajustables. La société tend alors à être pensée comme système, et le pouvoir comme opération de codage. +Il faut ici convoquer la pensée de Claude Shannon, qui dans sa *Théorie +mathématique de la communication* (1948), posait que tout message peut +être analysé comme une séquence d'unités discrètes (bits), où seule +compte la capacité de transmettre sans bruit. Mais la force de cette +théorie réside moins dans sa dimension technique que dans son impact +conceptuel : elle permet de penser la réalité sociale comme un ensemble +de signaux transmissibles, comparables et ajustables. La société tend +alors à être pensée comme système, et le pouvoir comme opération de +codage. -Cette réduction du monde à des flux interprétables est le point de départ de la cratialité informationnelle. Dans ce régime, le pouvoir ne s’exerce plus à travers le muscle, le décret ou la présence physique, mais à travers l’architecture logique des interfaces, la captation de données, l’alignement d’indicateurs, l’intégration d’alertes. Il s’agit moins de contraindre que de *pré-configurer l’action* en modulant les paramètres d’entrée. Le signal devient ainsi l’une des unités opératoires du pouvoir. +Cette réduction du monde à des flux interprétables est le point de +départ de la cratialité informationnelle. Dans ce régime, le pouvoir ne +s'exerce plus à travers le muscle, le décret ou la présence physique, +mais à travers l'architecture logique des interfaces, la captation de +données, l'alignement d'indicateurs, l'intégration d'alertes. Il s'agit +moins de contraindre que de *pré-configurer l'action* en modulant les +paramètres d'entrée. Le signal devient ainsi l'une des unités +opératoires du pouvoir. -Ce déplacement a des conséquences profondes. Il redéfinit les conditions même de la conflictualité. Car dans un monde où tout est converti en data, le dissensus n’est plus traité comme contradiction politique : il est résorbé comme anomalie statistique. Cette invisibilisation des écarts, cette absorption des désajustements dans des marges de tolérance prédéfinies, constitue l’un des traits les plus puissants — et les plus pervers — de la cratialité informationnelle. Elle est capable de neutraliser l’imprévu par sa réduction à du bruit. +Ce déplacement a des conséquences profondes. Il redéfinit les conditions +même de la conflictualité. Car dans un monde où tout est converti en +data, le dissensus n'est plus traité comme contradiction politique : il +est résorbé comme anomalie statistique. Cette invisibilisation des +écarts, cette absorption des désajustements dans des marges de tolérance +prédéfinies, constitue l'un des traits les plus puissants — et les +plus pervers — de la cratialité informationnelle. Elle est capable de +neutraliser l'imprévu par sa réduction à du bruit. -Ainsi s’ouvre un régime de la puissance par signal : une cratialité non spectaculaire, mais d’autant plus efficace, qui fonde un nouvel âge de la régulation sans apparence, sans geste, sans bruit — par calcul pur. +Ainsi s'ouvre un régime de la puissance par signal : une cratialité non +spectaculaire, mais d'autant plus efficace, qui fonde un nouvel âge de +la régulation sans apparence, sans geste, sans bruit — par calcul pur. -Dans la cratialité informationnelle, le signal ne désigne pas simplement une variation mesurable dans une transmission technique — il devient *l’unité gouvernante de la modulation sociale*. Ce glissement sémantique du signal, de la théorie de la communication vers la théorie du pouvoir, constitue un saut politique majeur : car il permet d’instaurer une forme de régulation où la norme ne passe plus par des lois ni même par des normes visibles, mais par des écarts imperceptibles, mesurables, et continuellement ajustés dans le flux. +Dans la cratialité informationnelle, le signal ne désigne pas simplement +une variation mesurable dans une transmission technique — il devient +*l'unité gouvernante de la modulation sociale*. Ce glissement sémantique +du signal, de la théorie de la communication vers la théorie du pouvoir, +constitue un saut politique majeur : car il permet d'instaurer une forme +de régulation où la norme ne passe plus par des lois ni même par des +normes visibles, mais par des écarts imperceptibles, mesurables, et +continuellement ajustés dans le flux. -L’axiome fondamental de cette mutation repose sur une hypothèse radicale : *les phénomènes sociaux tendent à être traités comme des phénomènes de signalisation*. De la présence physique à la performance économique, de la consommation énergétique à la santé publique, tout devient décomposable en variables interprétables, modélisables, exploitables par rétroaction. La puissance, ici, ne réside plus dans l’émission d’un ordre, mais dans la *structuration des paramètres d’émission-réception-interprétation*. +L'axiome fondamental de cette mutation repose sur une hypothèse radicale +: *les phénomènes sociaux tendent à être traités comme des phénomènes de +signalisation*. De la présence physique à la performance économique, de +la consommation énergétique à la santé publique, tout devient +décomposable en variables interprétables, modélisables, exploitables par +rétroaction. La puissance, ici, ne réside plus dans l'émission d'un +ordre, mais dans la *structuration des paramètres +d'émission-réception-interprétation*. -Norbert Wiener, dans *Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine* (1948), avait déjà formulé cette intuition : ce n’est pas le geste ni le contenu qui importe, mais le feedback, cette *capacité d’un système à se réajuster par retour d’information*. Ce principe s’applique aussi bien à une machine qu’à une société. La boucle cybernétique devient alors l’unité régulatrice de la gouvernance contemporaine : *une architecture de pouvoir sans autorité explicite*, mais dont la puissance tient dans la capacité à *produire des signaux interprétables et à réagir de façon optimisée à leurs fluctuations*. +Norbert Wiener, dans *Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the +Animal and the Machine* (1948), avait déjà formulé cette intuition : ce +n'est pas le geste ni le contenu qui importe, mais le feedback, cette +*capacité d'un système à se réajuster par retour d'information*. Ce +principe s'applique aussi bien à une machine qu'à une société. La boucle +cybernétique devient alors l'unité régulatrice de la gouvernance +contemporaine : *une architecture de pouvoir sans autorité explicite*, +mais dont la puissance tient dans la capacité à *produire des signaux +interprétables et à réagir de façon optimisée à leurs fluctuations*. -C’est ici qu’opère la torsion majeure : le réel tend à valoir d’abord dans sa conversion en signal, et c’est dans cette conversion que se joue l’essentiel du pouvoir. Le réel tend à valoir comme ce qui est mesuré, modulable, déjà pré-intégré dans un système de retour automatique. Ce paradigme n’est plus seulement technologique — il est *onto-politique*. Il restructure les régimes de vérité. La véridiction elle-même devient une fonction du signal. +C'est ici qu'opère la torsion majeure : le réel tend à valoir d'abord +dans sa conversion en signal, et c'est dans cette conversion que se joue +l'essentiel du pouvoir. Le réel tend à valoir comme ce qui est mesuré, +modulable, déjà pré-intégré dans un système de retour automatique. Ce +paradigme n'est plus seulement technologique — il est +*onto-politique*. Il restructure les régimes de vérité. La véridiction +elle-même devient une fonction du signal. -Autrement dit, la normativité dans les régimes contemporains de pouvoir n’est plus *imposée* : elle est *inscrite* dans l’architecture même des systèmes de signalisation. Ce que Michel Foucault appelait les « technologies de pouvoir » (dans *Sécurité, territoire, population*, 1978) trouve ici une expression radicalisée : l’efficacité gouvernante ne passe plus par l’obéissance, mais par la calibrabilité des conduites. Et celle-ci s’opère *en amont*, à travers la structuration des seuils, des alertes et des diagrammes de tendance. +Autrement dit, la normativité dans les régimes contemporains de pouvoir +n'est plus *imposée* : elle est *inscrite* dans l'architecture même des +systèmes de signalisation. Ce que Michel Foucault appelait les « +technologies de pouvoir » (dans *Sécurité, territoire, population*, +1978) trouve ici une expression radicalisée : l'efficacité gouvernante +ne passe plus par l'obéissance, mais par la calibrabilité des conduites. +Et celle-ci s'opère *en amont*, à travers la structuration des seuils, +des alertes et des diagrammes de tendance. -Ce nouveau langage du pouvoir tend à devenir pré-symbolique et post-politique. Il n’a pas besoin d’idéologie, car il est opérationnel. Il n’a pas besoin de discours, car il est infra-discursif. Il se déploie à travers les tableaux de bord, les interfaces, les indicateurs-clés, les visualisations dynamiques. Sa force tient à cette invisibilité : le pouvoir s’exerce dans le signal, sous l’apparence de la neutralité. +Ce nouveau langage du pouvoir tend à devenir pré-symbolique et +post-politique. Il n'a pas besoin d'idéologie, car il est opérationnel. +Il n'a pas besoin de discours, car il est infra-discursif. Il se déploie +à travers les tableaux de bord, les interfaces, les indicateurs-clés, +les visualisations dynamiques. Sa force tient à cette invisibilité : le +pouvoir s'exerce dans le signal, sous l'apparence de la neutralité. -C’est ce que Luc Boltanski et Ève Chiapello, dans *Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme* (1999), ont bien perçu : la critique sociale des années 1968 a été absorbée par les nouvelles structures managériales, qui ont remplacé le contrôle hiérarchique par une *gouvernance par objectifs*, appuyée sur des *indicateurs chiffrés*. Le pouvoir n’est plus dans l’ordre explicite, mais dans l’algorithme. Il ne dit plus : “fais ceci”, mais : “voici ton taux de performance”. La norme devient signal. Et l’adhésion, quant à elle, devient fonction du feedback : l’individu se régule lui-même *pour rester dans la boucle*. +C'est ce que Luc Boltanski et Ève Chiapello, dans *Le Nouvel Esprit du +Capitalisme* (1999), ont bien perçu : la critique sociale des années +1968 a été absorbée par les nouvelles structures managériales, qui ont +remplacé le contrôle hiérarchique par une *gouvernance par objectifs*, +appuyée sur des *indicateurs chiffrés*. Le pouvoir n'est plus dans +l'ordre explicite, mais dans l'algorithme. Il ne dit plus : "fais ceci", +mais : "voici ton taux de performance". La norme devient signal. Et +l'adhésion, quant à elle, devient fonction du feedback : l'individu se +régule lui-même *pour rester dans la boucle*. -Dans un tel système, la cratialité ne se manifeste plus comme une domination extérieure : elle devient *intériorisée sous forme de performance attendue*. C’est ce que Byung-Chul Han nomme dans *La société de la transparence* (2012) le passage du « pouvoir négatif » au « pouvoir positif » : le contrôle cesse d’interdire pour optimiser ; il ne discipline plus seulement, il rend mesurablement performant. Le sujet tend alors à être traité comme un vecteur de signaux mesurables. +Dans un tel système, la cratialité ne se manifeste plus comme une +domination extérieure : elle devient *intériorisée sous forme de +performance attendue*. C'est ce que Byung-Chul Han nomme dans *La +société de la transparence* (2012) le passage du « pouvoir négatif » au +« pouvoir positif » : le contrôle cesse d'interdire pour optimiser ; il +ne discipline plus seulement, il rend mesurablement performant. Le sujet +tend alors à être traité comme un vecteur de signaux mesurables. -En somme, ce second bloc nous montre que le pouvoir dans l’ère cybernétique ne s’exerce pas malgré le signal, ni par-dessus lui, mais à travers lui. Et que dans cette mutation, le langage du pouvoir cesse d’être politique pour devenir *instrumental, calculatoire, infra-structurant*. La scène du dissensus s’efface au profit de la régulation adaptative. +En somme, ce second bloc nous montre que le pouvoir dans l'ère +cybernétique ne s'exerce pas malgré le signal, ni par-dessus lui, mais à +travers lui. Et que dans cette mutation, le langage du pouvoir cesse +d'être politique pour devenir *instrumental, calculatoire, +infra-structurant*. La scène du dissensus s'efface au profit de la +régulation adaptative. -Si la théorie du signal fournit le socle ontologique de la cratialité informationnelle, c’est dans la montée en puissance du *management par les chiffres* que cette logique se réalise pleinement dans les sphères économique, administrative, organisationnelle et sociale. Loin d’être un simple outil de gestion ou de rationalisation, l’indicateur devient ici un nœud performatif du pouvoir moderne : il ne mesure pas seulement ce qui existe, il produit ce qui devient mesurable — et donc gouvernable. +Si la théorie du signal fournit le socle ontologique de la cratialité +informationnelle, c'est dans la montée en puissance du *management par +les chiffres* que cette logique se réalise pleinement dans les sphères +économique, administrative, organisationnelle et sociale. Loin d'être un +simple outil de gestion ou de rationalisation, l'indicateur devient ici +un nœud performatif du pouvoir moderne : il ne mesure pas seulement ce +qui existe, il produit ce qui devient mesurable — et donc gouvernable. -L’histoire du management moderne est ainsi marquée par une reconfiguration du langage même de l’autorité : ce n’est plus l’autorité hiérarchique, ni même la discipline, qui régule les conduites, mais un système d’indicateurs qui opèrent comme des *prescriptions déguisées*, insérées dans le langage de l’objectivité, de l’évidence quantitative, de la rationalité instrumentale. Le pouvoir tend à être indexé sur la mesure. +L'histoire du management moderne est ainsi marquée par une +reconfiguration du langage même de l'autorité : ce n'est plus l'autorité +hiérarchique, ni même la discipline, qui régule les conduites, mais un +système d'indicateurs qui opèrent comme des *prescriptions déguisées*, +insérées dans le langage de l'objectivité, de l'évidence quantitative, +de la rationalité instrumentale. Le pouvoir tend à être indexé sur la +mesure. -Le tournant se joue dès les années 1970, dans le sillage du toyotisme, mais aussi avec la crise du fordisme et la montée des théories de l’efficience systémique. Le vocabulaire managérial se transforme : au lieu de « donner des ordres », on parle désormais de *KPI* (Key Performance Indicators), de *ROI* (Return On Investment), de *benchmarking*, de *dashboarding*, de *stratégies data-driven*. C’est le règne de ce que l’on pourrait nommer une *gouvernementalité par les indicateurs*, au sens foucaldien. +Le tournant se joue dès les années 1970, dans le sillage du toyotisme, +mais aussi avec la crise du fordisme et la montée des théories de +l'efficience systémique. Le vocabulaire managérial se transforme : au +lieu de « donner des ordres », on parle désormais de *KPI* (Key +Performance Indicators), de *ROI* (Return On Investment), de +*benchmarking*, de *dashboarding*, de *stratégies data-driven*. C'est le +règne de ce que l'on pourrait nommer une *gouvernementalité par les +indicateurs*, au sens foucaldien. -Dans ce cadre, l’indicateur ne se contente pas d’évaluer une performance passée : il devient *objectif à atteindre*, *outil d’auto-gouvernement*, *norme implicite*. Il précède l’action. Il conditionne la décision. Il structure le comportement. Il configure le réel par anticipation. Ainsi, ce que l’on mesure ne reflète pas seulement une situation : cela *produit* la situation comme ce qu’il faut désormais *reproduire*. Le chiffre devient horizon normatif. Comme le formule Pierre Bourdieu dans *Sur l'État* (2012) : « ce qui est mesuré tend à devenir ce qui vaut ». +Dans ce cadre, l'indicateur ne se contente pas d'évaluer une performance +passée : il devient *objectif à atteindre*, *outil d'auto-gouvernement*, +*norme implicite*. Il précède l'action. Il conditionne la décision. Il +structure le comportement. Il configure le réel par anticipation. Ainsi, +ce que l'on mesure ne reflète pas seulement une situation : cela +*produit* la situation comme ce qu'il faut désormais *reproduire*. Le +chiffre devient horizon normatif. Comme le formule Pierre Bourdieu dans +*Sur l'État* (2012) : « ce qui est mesuré tend à devenir ce qui vaut ». -Mais il faut ici aller plus loin, et reconnaître que cette métrification du pouvoir s’accompagne d’un processus de *dépolitisation radicale*. Car l’indicateur devient difficilement contestable, parce qu’il est présenté comme technique, neutre et factuel. Il rend obsolète le débat politique au nom de la performance chiffrée. Il désactive le dissensus en le remplaçant par une *comparaison standardisée*. C’est ce que dénonce vigoureusement Alain Supiot dans *La gouvernance par les nombres* (2015), lorsqu’il souligne que « le chiffre n’est pas un langage, c’est un ordre. Un ordre sans sujet, mais qui agit partout ». +Mais il faut ici aller plus loin, et reconnaître que cette métrification +du pouvoir s'accompagne d'un processus de *dépolitisation radicale*. Car +l'indicateur devient difficilement contestable, parce qu'il est présenté +comme technique, neutre et factuel. Il rend obsolète le débat politique +au nom de la performance chiffrée. Il désactive le dissensus en le +remplaçant par une *comparaison standardisée*. C'est ce que dénonce +vigoureusement Alain Supiot dans *La gouvernance par les nombres* +(2015), lorsqu'il souligne que « le chiffre n'est pas un langage, c'est +un ordre. Un ordre sans sujet, mais qui agit partout ». -Cette logique, fondamentalement, opère une *substitution du débat politique par une logique indicative*. Le pouvoir cesse de commander. Il compare. Il classe. Il corrige. Il fait varier les seuils. Il attribue des scores. Et c’est à travers cette grammaire silencieuse que la soumission s’organise : *non pas à une volonté identifiable*, mais à des « objectifs quantifiés », à des « niveaux de qualité », à des « taux de conformité ». La violence ne vient plus de l’ordre, mais du chiffre. Elle est moins visible, mais plus pernicieuse. Elle ne contraint pas : elle *oriente structurellement*. +Cette logique, fondamentalement, opère une *substitution du débat +politique par une logique indicative*. Le pouvoir cesse de commander. Il +compare. Il classe. Il corrige. Il fait varier les seuils. Il attribue +des scores. Et c'est à travers cette grammaire silencieuse que la +soumission s'organise : *non pas à une volonté identifiable*, mais à des +« objectifs quantifiés », à des « niveaux de qualité », à des « taux de +conformité ». La violence ne vient plus de l'ordre, mais du chiffre. +Elle est moins visible, mais plus pernicieuse. Elle ne contraint pas : +elle *oriente structurellement*. -Prenons ici l’exemple paradigmatique de l’hôpital public contemporain. Sous l’effet de la Nouvelle Gestion Publique (New Public Management), les établissements de santé ne sont plus jugés sur la qualité du soin, mais sur des *indicateurs de flux*, de rotation, de taux d’occupation, de nombre de patients par heure, de taux de facturation à l’acte. Le médecin devient agent de performance, le patient unité de codage, et la qualité une variable d’efficience. Comme le souligne Frédéric Pierru, cette mise en chiffres du soin transforme une relation humaine en protocole algorithmique, *enlevant aux acteurs toute autonomie réelle tout en prétendant la leur restituer*. +Prenons ici l'exemple paradigmatique de l'hôpital public contemporain. +Sous l'effet de la Nouvelle Gestion Publique (New Public Management), +les établissements de santé ne sont plus jugés sur la qualité du soin, +mais sur des *indicateurs de flux*, de rotation, de taux d'occupation, +de nombre de patients par heure, de taux de facturation à l'acte. Le +médecin devient agent de performance, le patient unité de codage, et la +qualité une variable d'efficience. Comme le souligne Frédéric Pierru, +cette mise en chiffres du soin transforme une relation humaine en +protocole algorithmique, *enlevant aux acteurs toute autonomie réelle +tout en prétendant la leur restituer*. -Ce modèle s’est ensuite généralisé à l’école, à l’université, à la recherche, à la justice, à la culture, à la police, à l’armée. Partout, les indicateurs tendent à remplacer les débats, les quotas les valeurs, et les grilles les jugements. Et c’est cette systématisation qui constitue l’essence de la cratialité informationnelle : une régulation sans coercition, *mais par anticipation adaptative*, par rétroaction chiffrée, par intégration silencieuse du comportement à un *tableau de bord universel*. +Ce modèle s'est ensuite généralisé à l'école, à l'université, à la +recherche, à la justice, à la culture, à la police, à l'armée. Partout, +les indicateurs tendent à remplacer les débats, les quotas les valeurs, +et les grilles les jugements. Et c'est cette systématisation qui +constitue l'essence de la cratialité informationnelle : une régulation +sans coercition, *mais par anticipation adaptative*, par rétroaction +chiffrée, par intégration silencieuse du comportement à un *tableau de +bord universel*. -Il est fondamental de comprendre que cette logique opère dans un régime de *transparence apparente mais d’opacité structurelle*. Car si tout semble mesuré, tout semble visible, tout semble piloté, *la question du pourquoi reste intraitable*. C’est le règne d’un pouvoir *invisible parce que disséminé dans le dispositif lui-même*, selon une dynamique qui rappelle ce que Jacques Ellul appelait dans *Le Système technicien* (1977) : *la logique autonome de l’efficacité*. +Il est fondamental de comprendre que cette logique opère dans un régime +de *transparence apparente mais d'opacité structurelle*. Car si tout +semble mesuré, tout semble visible, tout semble piloté, *la question du +pourquoi reste intraitable*. C'est le règne d'un pouvoir *invisible +parce que disséminé dans le dispositif lui-même*, selon une dynamique +qui rappelle ce que Jacques Ellul appelait dans *Le Système technicien* +(1977) : *la logique autonome de l'efficacité*. -On peut ainsi établir que le management par les chiffres constitue l’un des points nodaux de la cratialité contemporaine : il transforme le pouvoir en pilotage, la politique en statistique, l’agir en performance. Il efface les sujets, pour ne laisser subsister que des trajectoires mesurables dans des environnements gouvernés par la norme silencieuse du signal. La soumission tend à devenir automatique, dans un univers où l’action juste tend à être celle qui maximise l’indicateur. Et l’indicateur tend ainsi à s’imposer sans justification politique explicite. +On peut ainsi établir que le management par les chiffres constitue l'un +des points nodaux de la cratialité contemporaine : il transforme le +pouvoir en pilotage, la politique en statistique, l'agir en performance. +Il efface les sujets, pour ne laisser subsister que des trajectoires +mesurables dans des environnements gouvernés par la norme silencieuse du +signal. La soumission tend à devenir automatique, dans un univers où +l'action juste tend à être celle qui maximise l'indicateur. Et +l'indicateur tend ainsi à s'imposer sans justification politique +explicite. -C’est sans doute dans le modèle toyotiste, élaboré au Japon au sortir de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, que se condense de manière particulièrement nette la cratialité informationnelle moderne — non comme mobilisation des corps ou polarisation idéologique, mais comme régulation permanente par les signaux, par l’ajustement micro-décisionnel, par l’auto-correction organisée du système. Là où le fordisme tendait à massifier la production par la répétition industrielle et la standardisation des tâches, le toyotisme inaugure une logique de *flux*, d’*adaptation en temps réel*, d’*intégration dynamique des unités productives* à un système vivant, autorégulé. +C'est sans doute dans le modèle toyotiste, élaboré au Japon au sortir de +la Seconde Guerre mondiale, que se condense de manière particulièrement +nette la cratialité informationnelle moderne — non comme mobilisation +des corps ou polarisation idéologique, mais comme régulation permanente +par les signaux, par l'ajustement micro-décisionnel, par +l'auto-correction organisée du système. Là où le fordisme tendait à +massifier la production par la répétition industrielle et la +standardisation des tâches, le toyotisme inaugure une logique de *flux*, +d'*adaptation en temps réel*, d'*intégration dynamique des unités +productives* à un système vivant, autorégulé. -Concrètement, le toyotisme repose sur plusieurs principes techniques et organisationnels, dont l’articulation produit un modèle régulatoire d’une remarquable efficacité informationnelle. Le plus emblématique est celui du *juste-à-temps* (*just-in-time*) : il ne s’agit plus d’anticiper la production par des stocks, mais de *synchroniser l’approvisionnement en fonction exacte de la demande*. La production devient une réponse différée à des signaux en provenance de l’aval de la chaîne. Elle est *tirée* par la consommation, et non *poussée* par l’offre. Le système de régulation n’est plus centralisé ni prescriptif : il devient *réactif*, *circulatoire*, *perceptif*. +Concrètement, le toyotisme repose sur plusieurs principes techniques et +organisationnels, dont l'articulation produit un modèle régulatoire +d'une remarquable efficacité informationnelle. Le plus emblématique est +celui du *juste-à-temps* (*just-in-time*) : il ne s'agit plus +d'anticiper la production par des stocks, mais de *synchroniser +l'approvisionnement en fonction exacte de la demande*. La production +devient une réponse différée à des signaux en provenance de l'aval de la +chaîne. Elle est *tirée* par la consommation, et non *poussée* par +l'offre. Le système de régulation n'est plus centralisé ni prescriptif : +il devient *réactif*, *circulatoire*, *perceptif*. -Ce principe s’appuie sur une série de dispositifs techniques : les *kanban* (étiquettes signalant les besoins de réapprovisionnement), les *andon* (signaux lumineux pour les arrêts de ligne), ou encore les systèmes de remontée d’incidents. Ces instruments sont à la fois simples, discrets, et redoutablement efficaces : ils produisent une *visibilité locale de la défaillance*, mais l’inscrivent immédiatement dans une chaîne globale d’ajustement. Le pouvoir n’est plus principalement un ordre venu d’en haut, mais un feed-back latéral intégré, qui réagit, corrige et relance. Comme l’analyse brillamment Michel Goxe dans *Les systèmes de production au Japon* (1993), le toyotisme n’est pas un simple changement technique : il est une *nouvelle logique du contrôle par l’information*, fondée sur la régulation décentralisée, la réactivité, l’efficience adaptative. +Ce principe s'appuie sur une série de dispositifs techniques : les +*kanban* (étiquettes signalant les besoins de réapprovisionnement), les +*andon* (signaux lumineux pour les arrêts de ligne), ou encore les +systèmes de remontée d'incidents. Ces instruments sont à la fois +simples, discrets, et redoutablement efficaces : ils produisent une +*visibilité locale de la défaillance*, mais l'inscrivent immédiatement +dans une chaîne globale d'ajustement. Le pouvoir n'est plus +principalement un ordre venu d'en haut, mais un feed-back latéral +intégré, qui réagit, corrige et relance. Comme l'analyse brillamment +Michel Goxe dans *Les systèmes de production au Japon* (1993), le +toyotisme n'est pas un simple changement technique : il est une +*nouvelle logique du contrôle par l'information*, fondée sur la +régulation décentralisée, la réactivité, l'efficience adaptative. -À cette logique de flux s’ajoute un second pilier fondamental : le *kaizen*, ou amélioration continue. Introduit dans l’entreprise par Masaaki Imai (cf. *Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success*, 1986), ce principe repose sur la participation active des salariés à l’identification, l’analyse, et la résolution des micro-dysfonctionnements quotidiens. À la différence du taylorisme, qui assigne les travailleurs à l’exécution passive de séquences prédéfinies, le toyotisme mobilise leur *capacité cognitive et critique* — mais en l’encadrant dans un cadre strictement normatif. Le salarié est appelé à *problématiser son geste*, à *optimiser sa propre pratique*, à *auto-réguler ses écarts*. +À cette logique de flux s'ajoute un second pilier fondamental : le +*kaizen*, ou amélioration continue. Introduit dans l'entreprise par +Masaaki Imai (cf. *Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success*, +1986), ce principe repose sur la participation active des salariés à +l'identification, l'analyse, et la résolution des +micro-dysfonctionnements quotidiens. À la différence du taylorisme, qui +assigne les travailleurs à l'exécution passive de séquences prédéfinies, +le toyotisme mobilise leur *capacité cognitive et critique* — mais en +l'encadrant dans un cadre strictement normatif. Le salarié est appelé à +*problématiser son geste*, à *optimiser sa propre pratique*, à +*auto-réguler ses écarts*. -Il ne s’agit pas d’une émancipation véritable, mais d’une mobilisation adaptative. La subjectivité est sollicitée, non pour résister ou créer, mais pour *conformer dynamiquement* le comportement aux exigences du système. Le pouvoir devient ici largement immanent au processus. Il n’impose plus de l’extérieur : il se loge dans la régularité du geste, dans l’ajustement des séquences, dans la réflexivité minutieuse du salarié intégré. Comme le montre Christian Thuderoz (*Sociologie du travail et de l'entreprise*, 2012), ce modèle opère une hybridation entre autonomie apparente et hétéronomie réelle, entre participation formelle et régulation invisible. +Il ne s'agit pas d'une émancipation véritable, mais d'une mobilisation +adaptative. La subjectivité est sollicitée, non pour résister ou créer, +mais pour *conformer dynamiquement* le comportement aux exigences du +système. Le pouvoir devient ici largement immanent au processus. Il +n'impose plus de l'extérieur : il se loge dans la régularité du geste, +dans l'ajustement des séquences, dans la réflexivité minutieuse du +salarié intégré. Comme le montre Christian Thuderoz (*Sociologie du +travail et de l'entreprise*, 2012), ce modèle opère une hybridation +entre autonomie apparente et hétéronomie réelle, entre participation +formelle et régulation invisible. -Ce processus est par ailleurs articulé à une *cartographie de la performance*, dans laquelle chaque unité de production, chaque poste, chaque opérateur, fait l’objet d’un suivi quantifié, comparé, réajusté. Les performances sont tracées, scorées, hiérarchisées, puis rétro-injectées dans les boucles de pilotage. L’ensemble du système devient *auto-apprenant*, non par choix démocratique ou souci éthique, mais par impératif d’efficience. Ce n’est pas l’intelligence humaine comme telle qui est valorisée, mais sa capacité à se soumettre activement à la norme du système. +Ce processus est par ailleurs articulé à une *cartographie de la +performance*, dans laquelle chaque unité de production, chaque poste, +chaque opérateur, fait l'objet d'un suivi quantifié, comparé, réajusté. +Les performances sont tracées, scorées, hiérarchisées, puis +rétro-injectées dans les boucles de pilotage. L'ensemble du système +devient *auto-apprenant*, non par choix démocratique ou souci éthique, +mais par impératif d'efficience. Ce n'est pas l'intelligence humaine +comme telle qui est valorisée, mais sa capacité à se soumettre +activement à la norme du système. -Le toyotisme sera ensuite théorisé et exporté sous le nom de *lean management*, dans les années 1990, notamment par James P. Womack et Daniel T. Jones dans *Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation* (1996). Ce courant promeut une élimination radicale des « gaspillages » (*muda*), une maximisation de la valeur ajoutée à chaque étape du processus, et une responsabilisation du salarié comme *acteur de la productivité en flux tendu*. Mais cette responsabilisation est strictement encadrée : elle ne débouche jamais sur une remise en cause structurelle, seulement sur une amélioration marginale du système existant. Le *lean* est une cratialité adaptative, pas une démocratie organisationnelle. +Le toyotisme sera ensuite théorisé et exporté sous le nom de *lean +management*, dans les années 1990, notamment par James P. Womack et +Daniel T. Jones dans *Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in +Your Corporation* (1996). Ce courant promeut une élimination radicale +des « gaspillages » (*muda*), une maximisation de la valeur ajoutée à +chaque étape du processus, et une responsabilisation du salarié comme +*acteur de la productivité en flux tendu*. Mais cette responsabilisation +est strictement encadrée : elle ne débouche jamais sur une remise en +cause structurelle, seulement sur une amélioration marginale du système +existant. Le *lean* est une cratialité adaptative, pas une démocratie +organisationnelle. -Enfin, il faut souligner que ce modèle a profondément transformé la régulation productive à l’échelle mondiale. Il a infiltré les chaînes logistiques globalisées, les systèmes d’information, les normes industrielles. Il a inspiré les politiques publiques de réforme de l’administration, les systèmes éducatifs, les dispositifs hospitaliers. Le toyotisme a ainsi dépassé l’usine : il est devenu un modèle plus général de gouvernement par ajustement. +Enfin, il faut souligner que ce modèle a profondément transformé la +régulation productive à l'échelle mondiale. Il a infiltré les chaînes +logistiques globalisées, les systèmes d'information, les normes +industrielles. Il a inspiré les politiques publiques de réforme de +l'administration, les systèmes éducatifs, les dispositifs hospitaliers. +Le toyotisme a ainsi dépassé l'usine : il est devenu un modèle plus +général de gouvernement par ajustement. -Ainsi le modèle toyotiste constitue une réalisation exemplaire de la *cratialité informationnelle*, dans laquelle la puissance ne s’impose plus comme force coercitive, mais comme *signal d’ajustement permanent*. Par la *fluidification des flux*, la *standardisation adaptative*, la *participation encadrée*, le pouvoir se dissout dans la logique même du processus. +Ainsi le modèle toyotiste constitue une réalisation exemplaire de la +*cratialité informationnelle*, dans laquelle la puissance ne s'impose +plus comme force coercitive, mais comme *signal d'ajustement permanent*. +Par la *fluidification des flux*, la *standardisation adaptative*, la +*participation encadrée*, le pouvoir se dissout dans la logique même du +processus. -Ce que révèle la dynamique de la cratialité informationnelle, c’est l’abandon progressif de toute forme de pouvoir manifesté, spectaculaire ou idéologique, au profit d’une *forme de puissance translucide*, discrète, inscrite dans la continuité des flux, dans l’opacité des infrastructures, dans la logique même des signaux. L’époque qui s’ouvre avec l’informatisation des entreprises, la rationalisation des données, la montée en puissance des interfaces numériques, n’est pas une époque de désétatisation ou de libéralisation au sens classique — mais une époque de réencodage technique du pouvoir à travers des langages logiques, des métriques gestionnaires et des dispositifs d’évaluation permanente. +Ce que révèle la dynamique de la cratialité informationnelle, c'est +l'abandon progressif de toute forme de pouvoir manifesté, spectaculaire +ou idéologique, au profit d'une *forme de puissance translucide*, +discrète, inscrite dans la continuité des flux, dans l'opacité des +infrastructures, dans la logique même des signaux. L'époque qui s'ouvre +avec l'informatisation des entreprises, la rationalisation des données, +la montée en puissance des interfaces numériques, n'est pas une époque +de désétatisation ou de libéralisation au sens classique — mais une +époque de réencodage technique du pouvoir à travers des langages +logiques, des métriques gestionnaires et des dispositifs d'évaluation +permanente. -La force cratiale, dans ce contexte, n’est plus une force physique, ni même une autorité symbolique : elle devient *signal*, *indicateur*, *feedback*. Elle agit par *translation immédiate* de l’action en mesure, de la mesure en norme, de la norme en comportement ajusté. Cette dynamique a été mise en évidence par Alain Supiot dans *La gouvernance par les nombres* (2015), qui montre comment le droit et la régulation sociale se trouvent progressivement substitués par un régime d’indicateurs, de benchmarks, de tableaux de bord. Ce n’est plus le souverain qui impose une règle : c’est l’algorithme qui propose une orientation, l’indicateur qui fixe un objectif, la plateforme qui pilote les gestes. Le pouvoir devient formellement non coercitif, mais structurellement indiscutable. +La force cratiale, dans ce contexte, n'est plus une force physique, ni +même une autorité symbolique : elle devient *signal*, *indicateur*, +*feedback*. Elle agit par *translation immédiate* de l'action en mesure, +de la mesure en norme, de la norme en comportement ajusté. Cette +dynamique a été mise en évidence par Alain Supiot dans *La gouvernance +par les nombres* (2015), qui montre comment le droit et la régulation +sociale se trouvent progressivement substitués par un régime +d'indicateurs, de benchmarks, de tableaux de bord. Ce n'est plus le +souverain qui impose une règle : c'est l'algorithme qui propose une +orientation, l'indicateur qui fixe un objectif, la plateforme qui pilote +les gestes. Le pouvoir devient formellement non coercitif, mais +structurellement indiscutable. -La théorie du signal joue ici un rôle décisif, non pas seulement en tant que technique de transmission, mais comme *modèle cognitif de la réalité*. Ce que Norbert Wiener esquissait dès *Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine* (1948), à travers la notion de rétroaction (feedback), devient un paradigme général de gouvernement : chaque action est lue comme un signal, chaque comportement comme une donnée, chaque situation comme un problème à résoudre par ajustement automatique. Il ne s’agit plus de commander, mais de corriger ; plus de prescrire, mais d’influencer ; plus de discipliner, mais de calibrer. +La théorie du signal joue ici un rôle décisif, non pas seulement en tant +que technique de transmission, mais comme *modèle cognitif de la +réalité*. Ce que Norbert Wiener esquissait dès *Cybernetics: Or Control +and Communication in the Animal and the Machine* (1948), à travers la +notion de rétroaction (feedback), devient un paradigme général de +gouvernement : chaque action est lue comme un signal, chaque +comportement comme une donnée, chaque situation comme un problème à +résoudre par ajustement automatique. Il ne s'agit plus de commander, +mais de corriger ; plus de prescrire, mais d'influencer ; plus de +discipliner, mais de calibrer. -Dans cette logique, la subjectivité elle-même devient un terminal d’ajustement. Le salarié, le consommateur, le citoyen — tous sont amenés à se percevoir comme *porteurs de performances mesurables*, comme *variables optimisables dans un système en perpétuelle adaptation*. Cette tendance culmine dans ce que Shoshana Zuboff appellera *surveillance capitalism* (*The Age of Surveillance Capitalism*, 2019) : une économie politique où les comportements sont captés, prédits, modifiés par des modèles d’apprentissage algorithmique, dont la logique est non pas de convaincre, mais d’orienter silencieusement les décisions. +Dans cette logique, la subjectivité elle-même devient un terminal +d'ajustement. Le salarié, le consommateur, le citoyen — tous sont +amenés à se percevoir comme *porteurs de performances mesurables*, comme +*variables optimisables dans un système en perpétuelle adaptation*. +Cette tendance culmine dans ce que Shoshana Zuboff appellera +*surveillance capitalism* (*The Age of Surveillance Capitalism*, 2019) : +une économie politique où les comportements sont captés, prédits, +modifiés par des modèles d'apprentissage algorithmique, dont la logique +est non pas de convaincre, mais d'orienter silencieusement les +décisions. -Le toyotisme, en ce sens, n’est pas seulement un modèle de production. Il est une préfiguration de cette cratialité signalétique : un régime dans lequel l’individu est à la fois opérateur, récepteur, et amplificateur du pouvoir. Le *lean management*, ses *indicateurs de performance*, ses *cercles de qualité*, ses *systèmes de suggestion* — tous ces éléments dessinent une gouvernance intégrée, où la norme n’est plus extérieure, mais *infiltrée dans l’acte même de produire*. +Le toyotisme, en ce sens, n'est pas seulement un modèle de production. +Il est une préfiguration de cette cratialité signalétique : un régime +dans lequel l'individu est à la fois opérateur, récepteur, et +amplificateur du pouvoir. Le *lean management*, ses *indicateurs de +performance*, ses *cercles de qualité*, ses *systèmes de suggestion* — tous ces éléments dessinent une gouvernance intégrée, où la norme n'est +plus extérieure, mais *infiltrée dans l'acte même de produire*. -On assiste ainsi à une mutation du mode cratial où le commandement recule au profit de la donnée, et l’obéissance cède du terrain à l’ajustement. Ce glissement transforme profondément la nature du pouvoir : il devient structurel, diffus et, par là même, difficilement contestable. Car comment contester une décision qui n’a pas été explicitement formulée, mais implicitement induite par un système de signaux ? +On assiste ainsi à une mutation du mode cratial où le commandement +recule au profit de la donnée, et l'obéissance cède du terrain à +l'ajustement. Ce glissement transforme profondément la nature du pouvoir +: il devient structurel, diffus et, par là même, difficilement +contestable. Car comment contester une décision qui n'a pas été +explicitement formulée, mais implicitement induite par un système de +signaux ? -La cratialité informationnelle prépare ainsi une forme particulièrement raffinée d’archicration. Elle opère avec une loi relayée, un centre diffus, mais avec une puissance de régulation qui excède souvent en efficacité les formes antérieures de commandement. En ce sens, elle ouvre la voie à une nouvelle phase historique, dans laquelle la régulation ne se contentera plus d’organiser les flux ou de gérer les corps, mais d’anticiper les comportements, de piloter les existences et de reconfigurer l’expérience même du réel. +La cratialité informationnelle prépare ainsi une forme particulièrement +raffinée d'archicration. Elle opère avec une loi relayée, un centre +diffus, mais avec une puissance de régulation qui excède souvent en +efficacité les formes antérieures de commandement. En ce sens, elle +ouvre la voie à une nouvelle phase historique, dans laquelle la +régulation ne se contentera plus d'organiser les flux ou de gérer les +corps, mais d'anticiper les comportements, de piloter les existences et +de reconfigurer l'expérience même du réel. -C’est cette montée en régime d’une régulation latente, dispersée, incarnée dans les dispositifs eux-mêmes, que nous analyserons dans la section suivante, en abordant la question de l’archicration algorithmique et des infrastructures de pouvoir à sujet effacé. +C'est cette montée en régime d'une régulation latente, dispersée, +incarnée dans les dispositifs eux-mêmes, que nous analyserons dans la +section suivante, en abordant la question de l'archicration +algorithmique et des infrastructures de pouvoir à sujet effacé. ### **4.4.3 — Archicration dispersée : interfaces, automatisation, effacement du politique** -Ce qui caractérise la phase avancée de la troisième révolution industrielle, bien plus que l’interconnexion des systèmes (arcalité systémique) ou la domination de la donnée et du signal (cratialité informationnelle), c’est l’effacement progressif des lieux visibles de la régulation, au profit de dispositifs techniques intégrés, opérants, sans visage ni voix, qui remplacent l’acte politique par des processus logiques, encodés, automatiques. Nous sommes entrés dans l’ère de l’archicration dispersée. +Ce qui caractérise la phase avancée de la troisième révolution +industrielle, bien plus que l'interconnexion des systèmes (arcalité +systémique) ou la domination de la donnée et du signal (cratialité +informationnelle), c'est l'effacement progressif des lieux visibles de +la régulation, au profit de dispositifs techniques intégrés, opérants, +sans visage ni voix, qui remplacent l'acte politique par des processus +logiques, encodés, automatiques. Nous sommes entrés dans l'ère de +l'archicration dispersée. -La scène régulatoire ne se présente plus comme institutionnelle, ni même comme idéologique : elle est technique, disséminée, ubiquitaire, opérant par *interfaces*, *procédures*, *protocoles*, *algorithmes* — autant de dispositifs qui organisent le monde sans se présenter comme prises de pouvoir. Le visage du pouvoir tend à s’effacer, le geste d’administration est remplacé par le clic, la règle par la case à cocher, la décision par l’option par défaut. L’interface devient opérateur de régulation : elle propose, oriente, bloque, valide, filtre, sans jamais se nommer comme autorité. Et dans cette configuration, le pouvoir devient moins visible et plus directement opératif — selon une logique que l’on pourrait dire *post-souveraine* : une archicration à sujet effacé. +La scène régulatoire ne se présente plus comme institutionnelle, ni même +comme idéologique : elle est technique, disséminée, ubiquitaire, opérant +par *interfaces*, *procédures*, *protocoles*, *algorithmes* — autant +de dispositifs qui organisent le monde sans se présenter comme prises de +pouvoir. Le visage du pouvoir tend à s'effacer, le geste +d'administration est remplacé par le clic, la règle par la case à +cocher, la décision par l'option par défaut. L'interface devient +opérateur de régulation : elle propose, oriente, bloque, valide, filtre, +sans jamais se nommer comme autorité. Et dans cette configuration, le +pouvoir devient moins visible et plus directement opératif — selon une +logique que l'on pourrait dire *post-souveraine* : une archicration à +sujet effacé. -Ce glissement n’est pas seulement un symptôme de complexification technique : il correspond à une reconfiguration radicale du mode de gouvernement. L’exemple paradigmatique de cette transformation est fourni par l’automatisation des procédures administratives, qui, dès les années 1980, supprime progressivement l’interaction humaine au profit de systèmes de gestion par formulaire (le Minitel en France en fut un précurseur), puis par interface numérique. Ce mouvement atteint sa pleine ampleur avec l’e-administration, où chaque acte citoyen devient une opération sur interface, et donc une action prédéterminée, scriptée, encadrée par le logiciel. La délibération y cède la place à des procédures préformatées. +Ce glissement n'est pas seulement un symptôme de complexification +technique : il correspond à une reconfiguration radicale du mode de +gouvernement. L'exemple paradigmatique de cette transformation est +fourni par l'automatisation des procédures administratives, qui, dès les +années 1980, supprime progressivement l'interaction humaine au profit de +systèmes de gestion par formulaire (le Minitel en France en fut un +précurseur), puis par interface numérique. Ce mouvement atteint sa +pleine ampleur avec l'e-administration, où chaque acte citoyen devient +une opération sur interface, et donc une action prédéterminée, scriptée, +encadrée par le logiciel. La délibération y cède la place à des +procédures préformatées. -Mais c’est dans le secteur financier, bancaire et assurantiel que cette dé-subjectivation de la régulation atteint son seuil critique. Les procédures de validation automatique des dossiers (scoring, machine learning, KYC automatisé), les contrôles d’éligibilité algorithmiques, les moteurs d’octroi de crédit, les évaluations d’assurance, toutes ces opérations sont désormais effectuées par des scripts, selon des critères non publics, non interprétables, non négociables. Le pouvoir n’est plus principalement dicté ; il est exécuté. Il ne repose plus sur une instance identifiable — il est encodé dans la chaîne opératoire même. +Mais c'est dans le secteur financier, bancaire et assurantiel que cette +dé-subjectivation de la régulation atteint son seuil critique. Les +procédures de validation automatique des dossiers (scoring, machine +learning, KYC automatisé), les contrôles d'éligibilité algorithmiques, +les moteurs d'octroi de crédit, les évaluations d'assurance, toutes ces +opérations sont désormais effectuées par des scripts, selon des critères +non publics, non interprétables, non négociables. Le pouvoir n'est plus +principalement dicté ; il est exécuté. Il ne repose plus sur une +instance identifiable — il est encodé dans la chaîne opératoire même. -Cette automatisation ne s’accompagne d’aucune revendication de souveraineté. Elle ne se dit pas, elle ne s’assume pas. Elle est *processuelle*, *fonctionnelle*, *pseudo-objective*. Elle ne juge plus au sens classique ; elle trie, bloque et filtre dans la chaîne opératoire elle-même. C’est ce que nous pouvons nommer ici une archicration dispersée : un méta-régime dans lequel le pouvoir de structuration n’est plus situé, mais disséminé dans l’architecture logique des systèmes d’information. Le code remplace la loi, le protocole supplante le décret, l’automatisme absorbe l’argumentation. +Cette automatisation ne s'accompagne d'aucune revendication de +souveraineté. Elle ne se dit pas, elle ne s'assume pas. Elle est +*processuelle*, *fonctionnelle*, *pseudo-objective*. Elle ne juge plus +au sens classique ; elle trie, bloque et filtre dans la chaîne +opératoire elle-même. C'est ce que nous pouvons nommer ici une +archicration dispersée : un méta-régime dans lequel le pouvoir de +structuration n'est plus situé, mais disséminé dans l'architecture +logique des systèmes d'information. Le code remplace la loi, le +protocole supplante le décret, l'automatisme absorbe l'argumentation. -Ce phénomène a été annoncé dès les années 1970 par les pionniers de l’informatique critique, notamment Joseph Weizenbaum, dans *Computer Power and Human Reason* (1976), qui dénonçait déjà la substitution de la décision humaine par des logiques mécaniques dépolitisées. Il s’institue aujourd’hui comme la forme dominante de la gouvernance technique : une forme sans visage net, sans responsable aisément identifiable, sans réversibilité simple. +Ce phénomène a été annoncé dès les années 1970 par les pionniers de +l'informatique critique, notamment Joseph Weizenbaum, dans *Computer +Power and Human Reason* (1976), qui dénonçait déjà la substitution de la +décision humaine par des logiques mécaniques dépolitisées. Il s'institue +aujourd'hui comme la forme dominante de la gouvernance technique : une +forme sans visage net, sans responsable aisément identifiable, sans +réversibilité simple. -C’est en cela que l’archicration dispersée ne constitue pas une simple évolution fonctionnelle du pouvoir, mais bien une mutation profonde du régime de régulation : elle efface les scènes où pouvait se produire le dissensus, elle élimine la possibilité de l’appel, elle tend à faire du monde une interface à extériorité de plus en plus réduite. +C'est en cela que l'archicration dispersée ne constitue pas une simple +évolution fonctionnelle du pouvoir, mais bien une mutation profonde du +régime de régulation : elle efface les scènes où pouvait se produire le +dissensus, elle élimine la possibilité de l'appel, elle tend à faire du +monde une interface à extériorité de plus en plus réduite. -Dans le prolongement direct de cette mutation infra-régulatoire des dispositifs de pouvoir, un autre phénomène décisif s’amorce : le retrait progressif mais stratégique de l’État comme acteur central de la régulation, au profit d’instances technico-financières transnationales, opérant selon une logique de *rationalité instrumentale pure* et d’abstraction calculatoire. Ce n’est pas une disparition de l’État, mais sa transformation en opérateur secondaire, en agent de conformité aux flux mondiaux, en garant d’interopérabilité, plus qu’en prescripteur souverain. L’État régule de moins en moins en position de surplomb ; il se trouve lui-même pris dans des cadres de régulation qu’il ne maîtrise plus pleinement. +Dans le prolongement direct de cette mutation infra-régulatoire des +dispositifs de pouvoir, un autre phénomène décisif s'amorce : le retrait +progressif mais stratégique de l'État comme acteur central de la +régulation, au profit d'instances technico-financières transnationales, +opérant selon une logique de *rationalité instrumentale pure* et +d'abstraction calculatoire. Ce n'est pas une disparition de l'État, mais +sa transformation en opérateur secondaire, en agent de conformité aux +flux mondiaux, en garant d'interopérabilité, plus qu'en prescripteur +souverain. L'État régule de moins en moins en position de surplomb ; il +se trouve lui-même pris dans des cadres de régulation qu'il ne maîtrise +plus pleinement. -Cette tendance s’ancre dès les années 1970 dans le retournement néolibéral amorcé à la suite du collapse du système de Bretton Woods (1971), puis de la crise pétrolière (1973). Les États-nations perdent alors progressivement leur monopole sur les instruments de politique économique (contrôle des changes, monnaie nationale, régulation commerciale), sous la pression des marchés internationaux, des agences de notation, des institutions financières transétatiques (FMI, Banque mondiale, GATT/OMC), mais aussi, et surtout, des normes comptables, des standards techniques, des formats juridiques d’extraterritorialité contractuelle, qui deviennent les véritables opérateurs de la régulation. Comme l’analyse Saskia Sassen dans *L'expulsion : Brutalité et complexité dans l'économie globale* (2014), la globalisation n’est pas une abolition des régulations, mais un changement radical de leur architecture : elles deviennent transnationales, apatrides, automatisées. +Cette tendance s'ancre dès les années 1970 dans le retournement +néolibéral amorcé à la suite du collapse du système de Bretton Woods +(1971), puis de la crise pétrolière (1973). Les États-nations perdent +alors progressivement leur monopole sur les instruments de politique +économique (contrôle des changes, monnaie nationale, régulation +commerciale), sous la pression des marchés internationaux, des agences +de notation, des institutions financières transétatiques (FMI, Banque +mondiale, GATT/OMC), mais aussi, et surtout, des normes comptables, des +standards techniques, des formats juridiques d'extraterritorialité +contractuelle, qui deviennent les véritables opérateurs de la +régulation. Comme l'analyse Saskia Sassen dans *L'expulsion : Brutalité +et complexité dans l'économie globale* (2014), la globalisation n'est +pas une abolition des régulations, mais un changement radical de leur +architecture : elles deviennent transnationales, apatrides, +automatisées. -L’emblème de cette mutation est fourni par la financiarisation intégrale des économies. À partir des années 1980, sous l’impulsion des réformes Reagan/Thatcher, les États délèguent leur autorité régulatoire aux logiques de marché, en promouvant la dérégulation bancaire, la libéralisation des capitaux, la désintermédiation du crédit. Mais cette délégation n’est pas une absence : elle est une requalification technique du politique, dans laquelle les institutions publiques se soumettent à des normes exogènes définies par des acteurs technico-financiers (agences de notation, banques centrales, multinationales de la donnée). L’État n’est plus pleinement maître des horloges : il devient à son tour contraint par des temporalités qu’il ne fixe plus seul. +L'emblème de cette mutation est fourni par la financiarisation intégrale +des économies. À partir des années 1980, sous l'impulsion des réformes +Reagan/Thatcher, les États délèguent leur autorité régulatoire aux +logiques de marché, en promouvant la dérégulation bancaire, la +libéralisation des capitaux, la désintermédiation du crédit. Mais cette +délégation n'est pas une absence : elle est une requalification +technique du politique, dans laquelle les institutions publiques se +soumettent à des normes exogènes définies par des acteurs +technico-financiers (agences de notation, banques centrales, +multinationales de la donnée). L'État n'est plus pleinement maître des +horloges : il devient à son tour contraint par des temporalités qu'il ne +fixe plus seul. -Cette évolution est particulièrement manifeste dans le domaine monétaire. L’indépendance des banques centrales, imposée comme critère de crédibilité macroéconomique (cf. les critères de Maastricht, 1992), désinstalle l’État de la gestion de sa propre monnaie. La politique monétaire devient une fonction algorithmique, orientée par des modèles économétriques, des cibles d’inflation, des ajustements techniques — non par des débats publics. Le citoyen n’a pratiquement aucune prise sur la planification de sa devise. Le politique devient opaque, crypté sous forme de taux directeurs, de *spreads* souverains, de notations de dettes. Ce que l’on nomme ici *archicration dispersée* est donc, très concrètement, la neutralisation politique de la régulation via son abstraction technico-financière. +Cette évolution est particulièrement manifeste dans le domaine +monétaire. L'indépendance des banques centrales, imposée comme critère +de crédibilité macroéconomique (cf. les critères de Maastricht, 1992), +désinstalle l'État de la gestion de sa propre monnaie. La politique +monétaire devient une fonction algorithmique, orientée par des modèles +économétriques, des cibles d'inflation, des ajustements techniques — non par des débats publics. Le citoyen n'a pratiquement aucune prise sur +la planification de sa devise. Le politique devient opaque, crypté sous +forme de taux directeurs, de *spreads* souverains, de notations de +dettes. Ce que l'on nomme ici *archicration dispersée* est donc, très +concrètement, la neutralisation politique de la régulation via son +abstraction technico-financière. -Il en va de même du droit : les accords multilatéraux (ALENA, OMC, TCE, TTIP) imposent des normes de compatibilité qui s’imposent aux législations nationales. Le droit devient cadre d’interopérabilité contractuelle, soumise à des tribunaux d’arbitrage privés (comme l’ISDS). Le champ du justiciable se restreint : la loi cède devant la clause, la souveraineté devant le contrat, et le normatif devant le format. C’est une mutation archicratico-formelle : la forme déterritorialisée du contrat transnational supplante la règle nationale substantielle. +Il en va de même du droit : les accords multilatéraux (ALENA, OMC, TCE, +TTIP) imposent des normes de compatibilité qui s'imposent aux +législations nationales. Le droit devient cadre d'interopérabilité +contractuelle, soumise à des tribunaux d'arbitrage privés (comme +l'ISDS). Le champ du justiciable se restreint : la loi cède devant la +clause, la souveraineté devant le contrat, et le normatif devant le +format. C'est une mutation archicratico-formelle : la forme +déterritorialisée du contrat transnational supplante la règle nationale +substantielle. -Parallèlement, la gouvernance algorithmique s’impose dans le champ assurantiel, bancaire, logistique, mais aussi dans l’éducation (évaluation PISA, classement Shanghai), la santé (indicateurs de performance hospitalière), le travail (algorithmes RH, scoring de productivité), et jusqu’à l’action publique elle-même (new public management, budgeting by indicators). Dans chaque cas, ce sont des protocoles de performance quantifiée, souvent conçus en dehors des États, qui dictent les cadres d’action. L’État devient gestionnaire de conformité, opérateur de benchmarking, garant d’indicateurs. +Parallèlement, la gouvernance algorithmique s'impose dans le champ +assurantiel, bancaire, logistique, mais aussi dans l'éducation +(évaluation PISA, classement Shanghai), la santé (indicateurs de +performance hospitalière), le travail (algorithmes RH, scoring de +productivité), et jusqu'à l'action publique elle-même (new public +management, budgeting by indicators). Dans chaque cas, ce sont des +protocoles de performance quantifiée, souvent conçus en dehors des +États, qui dictent les cadres d'action. L'État devient gestionnaire de +conformité, opérateur de benchmarking, garant d'indicateurs. -Enfin, il convient de souligner que cette régulation dispersée n’est pas sans conséquences sociopolitiques : elle produit une dilution du responsable, une désactivation du dissensus, une dépolitisation du réel. Comme le diagnostique Wendy Brown dans *Undoing the Demos* (2015), le néolibéralisme opère moins comme idéologie que comme *rationalité gouvernante*, qui redéfinit tous les domaines (juridique, social, éducatif, écologique) selon une grammaire gestionnaire. Ce que nous appelons ici *archicration dispersée* est précisément cette grammaire gouvernante : un agencement de formes, de formats et de calculs, sans lieu fixe ni visage stable, mais avec une puissance structurante considérable. +Enfin, il convient de souligner que cette régulation dispersée n'est pas +sans conséquences sociopolitiques : elle produit une dilution du +responsable, une désactivation du dissensus, une dépolitisation du réel. +Comme le diagnostique Wendy Brown dans *Undoing the Demos* (2015), le +néolibéralisme opère moins comme idéologie que comme *rationalité +gouvernante*, qui redéfinit tous les domaines (juridique, social, +éducatif, écologique) selon une grammaire gestionnaire. Ce que nous +appelons ici *archicration dispersée* est précisément cette grammaire +gouvernante : un agencement de formes, de formats et de calculs, sans +lieu fixe ni visage stable, mais avec une puissance structurante +considérable. -Ce qui se joue avec l’avènement de la régulation néolibérale à partir des années 1980, c’est une transformation radicale de l’ontologie politique du pouvoir : le marché n’y est plus conçu comme un mécanisme économique parmi d’autres, mais comme le principe organisateur général du monde social, selon une logique autorégulatrice abstraite, prétendument apolitique, anonyme et universelle. La puissance ne s’exerce plus depuis un sommet hiérarchique, ni même à travers des institutions visibles : elle se déploie à travers les structures d’incitation, les signaux de prix, les mécanismes de concurrence, les formats d’évaluation. Le marché tend à devenir l’un des opérateurs régulateurs majeurs — non parce qu’il impose frontalement, mais parce qu’il oriente. +Ce qui se joue avec l'avènement de la régulation néolibérale à partir +des années 1980, c'est une transformation radicale de l'ontologie +politique du pouvoir : le marché n'y est plus conçu comme un mécanisme +économique parmi d'autres, mais comme le principe organisateur général +du monde social, selon une logique autorégulatrice abstraite, +prétendument apolitique, anonyme et universelle. La puissance ne +s'exerce plus depuis un sommet hiérarchique, ni même à travers des +institutions visibles : elle se déploie à travers les structures +d'incitation, les signaux de prix, les mécanismes de concurrence, les +formats d'évaluation. Le marché tend à devenir l'un des opérateurs +régulateurs majeurs — non parce qu'il impose frontalement, mais parce +qu'il oriente. -Cette rationalité repose sur une conviction matricielle : le marché est plus intelligent que l’État. Ce postulat n’est pas seulement économique ; il est ontologique. Le monde devient lisible, gouvernable et optimisable si et seulement si ses phénomènes sont traduits en variables, en signaux, en incitations. Il s’agit là d’un véritable paradigme cybernétique de l’économie, hérité des travaux sur l’*auto-régulation des systèmes complexes*, où la stabilisation d’un système ne dépend plus d’un centre de contrôle, mais d’un jeu permanent d’ajustements correctifs, distribués dans le réseau. Le marché est alors modélisé comme une *machine à feedbacks*, où chaque prix, chaque indice, chaque notation constitue un *signal* qui guide les comportements rationnels. Il n’y a plus de souveraineté verticale clairement assumée, mais une régulation distribuée par les signaux. +Cette rationalité repose sur une conviction matricielle : le marché est +plus intelligent que l'État. Ce postulat n'est pas seulement économique +; il est ontologique. Le monde devient lisible, gouvernable et +optimisable si et seulement si ses phénomènes sont traduits en +variables, en signaux, en incitations. Il s'agit là d'un véritable +paradigme cybernétique de l'économie, hérité des travaux sur +l'*auto-régulation des systèmes complexes*, où la stabilisation d'un +système ne dépend plus d'un centre de contrôle, mais d'un jeu permanent +d'ajustements correctifs, distribués dans le réseau. Le marché est alors +modélisé comme une *machine à feedbacks*, où chaque prix, chaque indice, +chaque notation constitue un *signal* qui guide les comportements +rationnels. Il n'y a plus de souveraineté verticale clairement assumée, +mais une régulation distribuée par les signaux. -Ce modèle renverse ainsi la structure même de la décision politique : au lieu d’un pouvoir prescriptif, qui tranche et oriente, la gouvernementalité néolibérale produit des environnements régulés où les agents adaptent leurs conduites en fonction des incitations structurelles. Il ne s’agit plus d’ordonner, mais d’aménager les conditions dans lesquelles chacun choisira “librement” de se conformer. La liberté n’est plus une autonomie, mais une captation autoréflexive du signal optimisateur. Chacun devient gestionnaire de soi, investisseur de ses ressources, entrepreneur de sa trajectoire. +Ce modèle renverse ainsi la structure même de la décision politique : au +lieu d'un pouvoir prescriptif, qui tranche et oriente, la +gouvernementalité néolibérale produit des environnements régulés où les +agents adaptent leurs conduites en fonction des incitations +structurelles. Il ne s'agit plus d'ordonner, mais d'aménager les +conditions dans lesquelles chacun choisira "librement" de se conformer. +La liberté n'est plus une autonomie, mais une captation autoréflexive du +signal optimisateur. Chacun devient gestionnaire de soi, investisseur de +ses ressources, entrepreneur de sa trajectoire. -Dans cette perspective, la rationalité économique n’est plus un outil d’analyse, mais une matrice normative globale. Toute réalité devient traduisible en coût, en rendement, en score, en productivité. L’école devient un capital humain, la santé un investissement préventif, la ville une plateforme logistique, la nature un actif financiarisable. Il n’y a pas extension du marché : il y a intégration du monde dans un langage de marché. Le politique tend alors à être moins défini par le conflit ou la délibération que par l’ingénierie des équilibres. Le dissensus est de plus en plus requalifié en écart à corriger. +Dans cette perspective, la rationalité économique n'est plus un outil +d'analyse, mais une matrice normative globale. Toute réalité devient +traduisible en coût, en rendement, en score, en productivité. L'école +devient un capital humain, la santé un investissement préventif, la +ville une plateforme logistique, la nature un actif financiarisable. Il +n'y a pas extension du marché : il y a intégration du monde dans un +langage de marché. Le politique tend alors à être moins défini par le +conflit ou la délibération que par l'ingénierie des équilibres. Le +dissensus est de plus en plus requalifié en écart à corriger. -La conséquence majeure de cette architecture régulatoire est l’effacement du politique comme scène conflictuelle, au profit d’une scène paramétrique. L’action gouvernementale n’intervient plus sur le fond des objectifs, mais sur les modalités techniques d’ajustement : taux d’intérêt, stabilité monétaire, solvabilité systémique, risque calculé. Les macro-variables remplacent les projets. L’économie devient la *condition de possibilité* de toute autre chose. Et tout ce qui ne peut être chiffré, modélisé ou rentabilisé devient structurellement inaudible, illisible, inexistant. +La conséquence majeure de cette architecture régulatoire est +l'effacement du politique comme scène conflictuelle, au profit d'une +scène paramétrique. L'action gouvernementale n'intervient plus sur le +fond des objectifs, mais sur les modalités techniques d'ajustement : +taux d'intérêt, stabilité monétaire, solvabilité systémique, risque +calculé. Les macro-variables remplacent les projets. L'économie devient +la *condition de possibilité* de toute autre chose. Et tout ce qui ne +peut être chiffré, modélisé ou rentabilisé devient structurellement +inaudible, illisible, inexistant. -Cette invisibilisation du dissensus est rendue possible par l’abstraction généralisée de la régulation. Car le marché, en tant que dispositif autorégulateur, n’a ni visage clairement assignable, ni corps politique unifié, ni lieu stable. Il ne peut être interpellé, il ne peut être convoqué, il ne peut être responsabilisé. Il opère comme une nature seconde, une mécanique de vérité : ce qui est viable est ce qui est compétitif ; ce qui est vrai est ce qui performe. L’archicration devient ici une *métaphysique de l’ajustement* : un régime de pouvoir qui ne se dit jamais comme tel, mais qui impose ses effets sans jamais se montrer. +Cette invisibilisation du dissensus est rendue possible par +l'abstraction généralisée de la régulation. Car le marché, en tant que +dispositif autorégulateur, n'a ni visage clairement assignable, ni corps +politique unifié, ni lieu stable. Il ne peut être interpellé, il ne peut +être convoqué, il ne peut être responsabilisé. Il opère comme une nature +seconde, une mécanique de vérité : ce qui est viable est ce qui est +compétitif ; ce qui est vrai est ce qui performe. L'archicration devient +ici une *métaphysique de l'ajustement* : un régime de pouvoir qui ne se +dit jamais comme tel, mais qui impose ses effets sans jamais se montrer. -La mutation est totale : le politique tend à se dissoudre dans l’économique, qui lui-même s’efface dans la technique, laquelle tend à s’automatiser dans le calcul. Il reste de moins en moins de scène visible de la régulation — au profit d’instruments d’évaluation, de signaux indiciels et de protocoles de performance. Ce que l’on nomme ici *archicration dispersée* n’est donc pas une absence du pouvoir, mais sa transfiguration dans des formes abstraites, fluides, invisibles, qui n’autorisent plus la contestation car elles ne donnent plus prise à la critique. +La mutation est totale : le politique tend à se dissoudre dans +l'économique, qui lui-même s'efface dans la technique, laquelle tend à +s'automatiser dans le calcul. Il reste de moins en moins de scène +visible de la régulation — au profit d'instruments d'évaluation, de +signaux indiciels et de protocoles de performance. Ce que l'on nomme ici +*archicration dispersée* n'est donc pas une absence du pouvoir, mais sa +transfiguration dans des formes abstraites, fluides, invisibles, qui +n'autorisent plus la contestation car elles ne donnent plus prise à la +critique. -C’est ainsi que la rationalité néolibérale tend à accomplir le rêve cybernétique d’une gouvernance à gouvernants effacés. Le système se pilote tout seul — ou plutôt, il donne l’illusion de se piloter par lui-même, alors qu’il est activement conçu, paramétré, encadré par une ingénierie normative transnationale, technocratique, algorithmique, dont les effets sont aussi massifs que non revendiqués. L’archicration y devient régime d’effacement actif : une invisibilisation de la régulation par sa généralisation logique. +C'est ainsi que la rationalité néolibérale tend à accomplir le rêve +cybernétique d'une gouvernance à gouvernants effacés. Le système se +pilote tout seul — ou plutôt, il donne l'illusion de se piloter par +lui-même, alors qu'il est activement conçu, paramétré, encadré par une +ingénierie normative transnationale, technocratique, algorithmique, dont +les effets sont aussi massifs que non revendiqués. L'archicration y +devient régime d'effacement actif : une invisibilisation de la +régulation par sa généralisation logique. -Le cas du modèle de Black-Scholes, formalisé en 1973 dans l’article fondateur de Fischer Black et Myron Scholes intitulé *The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities* (*Journal of Political Economy*, vol. 81, n°3, 1973), constitue un cas paradigmatique de cette *archicration dispersée*. Ce n’est pas un simple outil de calcul financier ; c’est un opérateur de gouvernement : une infrastructure logique qui transforme les marchés en machines d’auto-régulation algorithmique, à souveraineté explicite effacée, à responsabilité peu visible, sans garant aisément identifiable. +Le cas du modèle de Black-Scholes, formalisé en 1973 dans l'article +fondateur de Fischer Black et Myron Scholes intitulé *The Pricing of +Options and Corporate Liabilities* (*Journal of Political Economy*, +vol. 81, n°3, 1973), constitue un cas paradigmatique de cette +*archicration dispersée*. Ce n'est pas un simple outil de calcul +financier ; c'est un opérateur de gouvernement : une infrastructure +logique qui transforme les marchés en machines d'auto-régulation +algorithmique, à souveraineté explicite effacée, à responsabilité peu +visible, sans garant aisément identifiable. -En apparence, la formule Black-Scholes a pour vocation d’estimer le « juste prix » d’une option financière à partir de paramètres comme la volatilité implicite, le temps jusqu’à échéance, le prix de l’actif sous-jacent ou le taux d’intérêt sans risque. Mais en profondeur, elle produit un effet politique radical : elle donne l’illusion que le risque est mesurable, modélisable, intégrable, donc assurable. Elle dépolitise l’incertitude, en la traduisant dans le langage du calcul probabiliste. Et par ce geste, elle reconfigure les fondements de la régulation financière : on ne gouverne plus les comportements, on paramètre des anticipations. +En apparence, la formule Black-Scholes a pour vocation d'estimer le « +juste prix » d'une option financière à partir de paramètres comme la +volatilité implicite, le temps jusqu'à échéance, le prix de l'actif +sous-jacent ou le taux d'intérêt sans risque. Mais en profondeur, elle +produit un effet politique radical : elle donne l'illusion que le risque +est mesurable, modélisable, intégrable, donc assurable. Elle dépolitise +l'incertitude, en la traduisant dans le langage du calcul probabiliste. +Et par ce geste, elle reconfigure les fondements de la régulation +financière : on ne gouverne plus les comportements, on paramètre des +anticipations. -Ce qui se met en place ici, c’est une nouvelle scène régulatoire à acteur diffus. Le modèle mathématique devient un *acteur automatique* de marché : une norme technique partagée, incorporée dans les logiciels de trading, les systèmes de gestion d’actifs, les algorithmes décisionnels. À travers lui, les marchés financiers sont non seulement modélisés, mais automatisés. La décision humaine est évacuée ; le jugement est absorbé par la machine. Et l’archicration devient pure logique de propagation : elle agit non par injonction, mais par induction algorithmique. +Ce qui se met en place ici, c'est une nouvelle scène régulatoire à +acteur diffus. Le modèle mathématique devient un *acteur automatique* de +marché : une norme technique partagée, incorporée dans les logiciels de +trading, les systèmes de gestion d'actifs, les algorithmes décisionnels. +À travers lui, les marchés financiers sont non seulement modélisés, mais +automatisés. La décision humaine est évacuée ; le jugement est absorbé +par la machine. Et l'archicration devient pure logique de propagation : +elle agit non par injonction, mais par induction algorithmique. -L’essor de la finance algorithmique dans les décennies suivantes — notamment avec le *high-frequency trading*, les *flash orders*, les *dark pools* — constitue un prolongement direct de cette logique. On ne régule plus par surveillance, mais par code. Le langage C++ remplace le code juridique ; les microsecondes remplacent les décrets. Et surtout : le pouvoir de décision devient temporellement inaccessible à la réflexivité humaine. Lors du *Flash Crash* du 6 mai 2010, le Dow Jones perdit plus de 1000 points en cinq minutes — non sous l’effet d’une panique humaine, mais d’une cascade d’ordres automatiques générés par des algorithmes opaques, interagissant sans supervision. +L'essor de la finance algorithmique dans les décennies suivantes — notamment avec le *high-frequency trading*, les *flash orders*, les +*dark pools* — constitue un prolongement direct de cette logique. On +ne régule plus par surveillance, mais par code. Le langage C++ remplace +le code juridique ; les microsecondes remplacent les décrets. Et surtout +: le pouvoir de décision devient temporellement inaccessible à la +réflexivité humaine. Lors du *Flash Crash* du 6 mai 2010, le Dow Jones +perdit plus de 1000 points en cinq minutes — non sous l'effet d'une +panique humaine, mais d'une cascade d'ordres automatiques générés par +des algorithmes opaques, interagissant sans supervision. -Dans cet écosystème, aucune instance n’apparaît clairement responsable, parce qu’aucune ne peut plus être identifiée comme centre principal de la régulation. Il y a des protocoles, des interfaces, des probabilités, des seuils, mais pas de volonté, pas de délibération, pas de redevabilité. La gouvernance se dissout dans un enchevêtrement de scripts, de paramètres, de seuils de déclenchement. Le *marché* — entité fictive mais performative — devient l’acteur principal du politique : il décide, il sanctionne, il valide ou invalide, non en fonction d’un jugement collectif, mais d’une logique d’efficience automatisée. +Dans cet écosystème, aucune instance n'apparaît clairement responsable, +parce qu'aucune ne peut plus être identifiée comme centre principal de +la régulation. Il y a des protocoles, des interfaces, des probabilités, +des seuils, mais pas de volonté, pas de délibération, pas de +redevabilité. La gouvernance se dissout dans un enchevêtrement de +scripts, de paramètres, de seuils de déclenchement. Le *marché* — entité fictive mais performative — devient l'acteur principal du +politique : il décide, il sanctionne, il valide ou invalide, non en +fonction d'un jugement collectif, mais d'une logique d'efficience +automatisée. -C’est ici que se joue le cœur de l’*archicration dispersée* : une régulation à sujet diffus, dont la scène et la norme deviennent de plus en plus difficiles à identifier. Le modèle de Black-Scholes n’a pas seulement permis une expansion inouïe des produits dérivés ; il a inauguré une ère dans laquelle la régulation est produite par les instruments eux-mêmes, par leur interaction calculée, par leur robustesse perçue. C’est une archicration qui n’a plus besoin d’incarnation, car elle agit à travers les architectures techniques d’un monde financiarisé. +C'est ici que se joue le cœur de l'*archicration dispersée* : une +régulation à sujet diffus, dont la scène et la norme deviennent de plus +en plus difficiles à identifier. Le modèle de Black-Scholes n'a pas +seulement permis une expansion inouïe des produits dérivés ; il a +inauguré une ère dans laquelle la régulation est produite par les +instruments eux-mêmes, par leur interaction calculée, par leur +robustesse perçue. C'est une archicration qui n'a plus besoin +d'incarnation, car elle agit à travers les architectures techniques d'un +monde financiarisé. -Et l’État, dans ce contexte, n’est plus principalement régulateur : il devient assureur en dernier ressort. Il intervient en cas de crise systémique (comme en 2008), mais sans pouvoir structurant, sans contrôle du cadre de normalité. Ce rôle résiduel n’est pas neutre : il signifie que la souveraineté ne décide plus des règles du jeu — elle garantit les pertes du jeu qu’elle ne maîtrise plus. L’État devient le garant résiduel d’un système qu’il a contribué à construire, mais dont il ne détient plus les clés. +Et l'État, dans ce contexte, n'est plus principalement régulateur : il +devient assureur en dernier ressort. Il intervient en cas de crise +systémique (comme en 2008), mais sans pouvoir structurant, sans contrôle +du cadre de normalité. Ce rôle résiduel n'est pas neutre : il signifie +que la souveraineté ne décide plus des règles du jeu — elle garantit +les pertes du jeu qu'elle ne maîtrise plus. L'État devient le garant +résiduel d'un système qu'il a contribué à construire, mais dont il ne +détient plus les clés. -Ainsi, la formule Black-Scholes, et plus largement la cyber-finance contemporaine, incarnent jusqu’à leur pointe extrême la logique de gouvernement par abstraction, sans garant, sans visage, sans espace de contestation. L’archicration y devient *effacement actif* : une scène régulatoire intégralement automatisée, où l’invisibilité n’est pas le symptôme d’un pouvoir faible, mais l’une des conditions de son efficacité maximale. +Ainsi, la formule Black-Scholes, et plus largement la cyber-finance +contemporaine, incarnent jusqu'à leur pointe extrême la logique de +gouvernement par abstraction, sans garant, sans visage, sans espace de +contestation. L'archicration y devient *effacement actif* : une scène +régulatoire intégralement automatisée, où l'invisibilité n'est pas le +symptôme d'un pouvoir faible, mais l'une des conditions de son +efficacité maximale. -Comme nous l’avons vu, ce qui s’est joué, entre les années 1970 et le milieu des années 2010, sous l’apparence d’une mutation technologique ou d’une dérégulation économique, est en réalité un basculement ontologique dans la nature même du pouvoir régulateur. L’archicration moderne, jusque-là incarnée dans des institutions visibles, des dispositifs étatiques ou des infrastructures matérielles, entre dans une nouvelle phase : celle de la dispersion technologique du gouvernement, où l’interface remplace l’institution, le signal remplace la norme, le code remplace la loi. +Comme nous l'avons vu, ce qui s'est joué, entre les années 1970 et le +milieu des années 2010, sous l'apparence d'une mutation technologique ou +d'une dérégulation économique, est en réalité un basculement ontologique +dans la nature même du pouvoir régulateur. L'archicration moderne, +jusque-là incarnée dans des institutions visibles, des dispositifs +étatiques ou des infrastructures matérielles, entre dans une nouvelle +phase : celle de la dispersion technologique du gouvernement, où +l'interface remplace l'institution, le signal remplace la norme, le code +remplace la loi. -Cette métamorphose n’est pas un simple déplacement des lieux du pouvoir. Elle constitue une dislocation radicale de ses modalités d’exercice : le pouvoir ne s’adresse plus, ne se montre plus, ne s’assume plus comme tel. Il opère à travers des procédures sans visage, des protocoles interconnectés, des architectures logicielles auto-référentielles. Il ne s’énonce plus comme tel ; il s’exécute dans les dispositifs. +Cette métamorphose n'est pas un simple déplacement des lieux du pouvoir. +Elle constitue une dislocation radicale de ses modalités d'exercice : le +pouvoir ne s'adresse plus, ne se montre plus, ne s'assume plus comme +tel. Il opère à travers des procédures sans visage, des protocoles +interconnectés, des architectures logicielles auto-référentielles. Il ne +s'énonce plus comme tel ; il s'exécute dans les dispositifs. -L’un des traits les plus caractéristiques de cette archicration dispersée est l’effacement de la souveraineté étatique en tant que scène centrale de la régulation. Non que l’État disparaisse. Mais il est progressivement évincé de ses fonctions de pilotage : les *régulations transnationales*, les *indices*, les *normes comptables* (IAS, Bâle II, Solvabilité II), les *standards techniques*, les *algorithmes de marché prennent le relais*. L’État devient un acteur parmi d’autres dans une grammaire régulatoire qu’il ne contrôle plus. Il garantit, compense, recapitalise, adapte — mais il ne fonde plus. +L'un des traits les plus caractéristiques de cette archicration +dispersée est l'effacement de la souveraineté étatique en tant que scène +centrale de la régulation. Non que l'État disparaisse. Mais il est +progressivement évincé de ses fonctions de pilotage : les *régulations +transnationales*, les *indices*, les *normes comptables* (IAS, Bâle II, +Solvabilité II), les *standards techniques*, les *algorithmes de marché +prennent le relais*. L'État devient un acteur parmi d'autres dans une +grammaire régulatoire qu'il ne contrôle plus. Il garantit, compense, +recapitalise, adapte — mais il ne fonde plus. -Dans ce cadre, le néolibéralisme n’est pas une doctrine économique : c’est une *gouvernementalité abstraite*, un *régime de rationalisation* fondé sur l’idée que les marchés, en tant qu’architectures informationnelles, possèdent une capacité autorégulatrice supérieure à toute volonté politique. Ce paradigme postule que la complexité du monde exige non des lois, mais des modèles ; non des institutions, mais des métriques ; non des arbitrages collectifs, mais des équilibres émergents. +Dans ce cadre, le néolibéralisme n'est pas une doctrine économique : +c'est une *gouvernementalité abstraite*, un *régime de rationalisation* +fondé sur l'idée que les marchés, en tant qu'architectures +informationnelles, possèdent une capacité autorégulatrice supérieure à +toute volonté politique. Ce paradigme postule que la complexité du monde +exige non des lois, mais des modèles ; non des institutions, mais des +métriques ; non des arbitrages collectifs, mais des équilibres +émergents. -Mais c’est précisément dans cette prétention à l’objectivité que réside le danger maximal : en niant son propre statut de pouvoir, la régulation automatisée se présente infaillible — donc incontestable. *La gouvernance sans visage devient gouvernement sans responsable*. Le pouvoir ne dit plus « je » : il agit par simulation, par seuils, par ajustements silencieux. Et c’est dans ce silence que s’opère la plus puissante des captures : celle de la régulation elle-même par des entités qui n’ont plus besoin de gouverner pour dominer. +Mais c'est précisément dans cette prétention à l'objectivité que réside +le danger maximal : en niant son propre statut de pouvoir, la régulation +automatisée se présente infaillible — donc incontestable. *La +gouvernance sans visage devient gouvernement sans responsable*. Le +pouvoir ne dit plus « je » : il agit par simulation, par seuils, par +ajustements silencieux. Et c'est dans ce silence que s'opère la plus +puissante des captures : celle de la régulation elle-même par des +entités qui n'ont plus besoin de gouverner pour dominer. -L’archicration dispersée n’est pas un simple dysfonctionnement du politique : elle peut être lue comme l’une de ses mutations post-politiques. Elle institue un monde où le pouvoir opère par dissolution, par intériorisation, par codage. +L'archicration dispersée n'est pas un simple dysfonctionnement du +politique : elle peut être lue comme l'une de ses mutations +post-politiques. Elle institue un monde où le pouvoir opère par +dissolution, par intériorisation, par codage. -Nous devons donc conclure cette section en affirmant ceci : l’archicration dispersée n’est pas l’absence de régulation — elle est son automatisation radicale. Elle instaure un monde dans lequel l’exercice du pouvoir ne passe plus par le visible, mais par l’opératoire ; non par l’incarnation, mais par l’interface ; non par la souveraineté, mais par la performativité du signal. Ce n’est plus l’État qui gouverne — ce sont les architectures techniques qui filtrent, orientent, valident, excluent, punissent, optimisent. C’est là, dans cette absence activement produite, que réside l’une des formes les plus puissantes de la régulation contemporaine. +Nous devons donc conclure cette section en affirmant ceci : +l'archicration dispersée n'est pas l'absence de régulation — elle est +son automatisation radicale. Elle instaure un monde dans lequel +l'exercice du pouvoir ne passe plus par le visible, mais par +l'opératoire ; non par l'incarnation, mais par l'interface ; non par la +souveraineté, mais par la performativité du signal. Ce n'est plus l'État +qui gouverne — ce sont les architectures techniques qui filtrent, +orientent, valident, excluent, punissent, optimisent. C'est là, dans +cette absence activement produite, que réside l'une des formes les plus +puissantes de la régulation contemporaine. ### **4.4.4 — Figures critiques et tensions émergentes : vulnérabilité, résistance, illusion du contrôle** -Ce qui se joue dans la dernière phase de la troisième révolution industrielle dépasse la seule extension des régimes de régulation réticulaires. Cette période, marquée par l’essor global des systèmes d’information, l’omniprésence des bases de données, la généralisation du calcul en temps réel et la diffusion planétaire des interfaces numériques, révèle un basculement plus profond : un changement qualitatif dans la nature même du pouvoir régulateur. En effet, le passage progressif d’une régulation spatialisée, structurée autour d’architectures visibles et de chaînes de commandement clairement identifiables, à une régulation informationnelle, automatisée, abstraite et intégrée dans l’infrastructure même du réel, introduit un nouveau type de fragilité — que nous devons reconnaître comme vulnérabilité systémique. +Ce qui se joue dans la dernière phase de la troisième révolution +industrielle dépasse la seule extension des régimes de régulation +réticulaires. Cette période, marquée par l'essor global des systèmes +d'information, l'omniprésence des bases de données, la généralisation du +calcul en temps réel et la diffusion planétaire des interfaces +numériques, révèle un basculement plus profond : un changement +qualitatif dans la nature même du pouvoir régulateur. En effet, le +passage progressif d'une régulation spatialisée, structurée autour +d'architectures visibles et de chaînes de commandement clairement +identifiables, à une régulation informationnelle, automatisée, abstraite +et intégrée dans l'infrastructure même du réel, introduit un nouveau +type de fragilité — que nous devons reconnaître comme vulnérabilité +systémique. -Cette vulnérabilité ne procède pas d’un défaut de régulation, mais d’un excès de régulation abstraite : à mesure que les régimes de contrôle s’éloignent de toute scène visible de décision, qu’ils s’auto-programment par extraction de corrélations massives et qu’ils opèrent dans des couches d’opacité technique inaccessibles à la délibération publique, ils rendent la société à la fois hyper-pilotée et aveugle à ses propres modalités de pilotage. Le monde devient *pilotable* mais *difficilement intelligible*, *régulé* mais *non interprétable*. Le paradoxe de cette mutation tient dans la tension entre l’intelligibilité locale (chaque protocole fonctionne selon ses propres logiques d’optimisation) et l’illisibilité globale (l’agencement systémique produit des effets inattendus, non prévisibles et souvent incontrôlables). L’archicration cybernétique, dans cette phase tardive, se désincarne au point de se soustraire à toute possibilité de reconfiguration réflexive : elle s’auto-légitime par la performance du code, non par la discussion politique. +Cette vulnérabilité ne procède pas d'un défaut de régulation, mais d'un +excès de régulation abstraite : à mesure que les régimes de contrôle +s'éloignent de toute scène visible de décision, qu'ils +s'auto-programment par extraction de corrélations massives et qu'ils +opèrent dans des couches d'opacité technique inaccessibles à la +délibération publique, ils rendent la société à la fois hyper-pilotée et +aveugle à ses propres modalités de pilotage. Le monde devient +*pilotable* mais *difficilement intelligible*, *régulé* mais *non +interprétable*. Le paradoxe de cette mutation tient dans la tension +entre l'intelligibilité locale (chaque protocole fonctionne selon ses +propres logiques d'optimisation) et l'illisibilité globale (l'agencement +systémique produit des effets inattendus, non prévisibles et souvent +incontrôlables). L'archicration cybernétique, dans cette phase tardive, +se désincarne au point de se soustraire à toute possibilité de +reconfiguration réflexive : elle s'auto-légitime par la performance du +code, non par la discussion politique. -Ce phénomène d’abstraction régulatoire sera, dès les années 1990, interrogé avec une acuité remarquable par Gilles Deleuze dans un texte aussi bref que fondateur, *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* (1990). Ce dernier ne se contente pas d’étendre le modèle foucaldien : il en diagnostique la saturation. Alors que les sociétés disciplinaires, selon Foucault, s’organisaient autour de dispositifs d’enfermement (l’école, la caserne, l’usine, l’hôpital, la prison) et d’un encadrement différencié des corps, les sociétés de contrôle se définissent par la modulation continue, la surveillance diffuse et l’ajustement en temps réel. L’individu n’est plus saisi d’abord comme un sujet à discipliner, mais comme une unité divisible de données, de traces et de séquences à traiter. Il ne s’agit plus prioritairement de normaliser des sujets moraux, mais d’optimiser des comportements à partir de profils calculables. L’acte régulateur n’est dès lors plus formulé comme un commandement explicite : il est intégré au circuit même de la circulation, dans les opérations de tri, de codage et d’ajustement. +Ce phénomène d'abstraction régulatoire sera, dès les années 1990, +interrogé avec une acuité remarquable par Gilles Deleuze dans un texte +aussi bref que fondateur, *Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle* +(1990). Ce dernier ne se contente pas d'étendre le modèle foucaldien : +il en diagnostique la saturation. Alors que les sociétés disciplinaires, +selon Foucault, s'organisaient autour de dispositifs d'enfermement +(l'école, la caserne, l'usine, l'hôpital, la prison) et d'un encadrement +différencié des corps, les sociétés de contrôle se définissent par la +modulation continue, la surveillance diffuse et l'ajustement en temps +réel. L'individu n'est plus saisi d'abord comme un sujet à discipliner, +mais comme une unité divisible de données, de traces et de séquences à +traiter. Il ne s'agit plus prioritairement de normaliser des sujets +moraux, mais d'optimiser des comportements à partir de profils +calculables. L'acte régulateur n'est dès lors plus formulé comme un +commandement explicite : il est intégré au circuit même de la +circulation, dans les opérations de tri, de codage et d'ajustement. -Cette perspective deleuzienne sera prolongée et radicalisée dans la décennie suivante par Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns, dans leur article fondateur *Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation* (2013), dans lequel ils analysent la montée d’un pouvoir sans sujet, d’un régime à scène effacée, d’un gouvernement sans institution centrale clairement identifiable. Loin des formes classiques du pouvoir souverain ou disciplinaire, la gouvernementalité algorithmique repose sur la captation massive de données, leur traitement statistique, et leur restitution sous forme de prédictions comportementales. Il ne s’agit plus de dire ce qui est permis ou interdit, ni même de produire une norme à laquelle les individus doivent se conformer, mais de *moduler* les comportements par des environnements d’incitation, des architectures d’orientation, des corrélations anticipatrices. La normativité ne passe plus par la loi, ni même par la morale : elle passe par le *score*, par la *notation*, par l’interface. +Cette perspective deleuzienne sera prolongée et radicalisée dans la +décennie suivante par Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns, dans leur +article fondateur *Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives +d'émancipation* (2013), dans lequel ils analysent la montée d'un pouvoir +sans sujet, d'un régime à scène effacée, d'un gouvernement sans +institution centrale clairement identifiable. Loin des formes classiques +du pouvoir souverain ou disciplinaire, la gouvernementalité +algorithmique repose sur la captation massive de données, leur +traitement statistique, et leur restitution sous forme de prédictions +comportementales. Il ne s'agit plus de dire ce qui est permis ou +interdit, ni même de produire une norme à laquelle les individus doivent +se conformer, mais de *moduler* les comportements par des environnements +d'incitation, des architectures d'orientation, des corrélations +anticipatrices. La normativité ne passe plus par la loi, ni même par la +morale : elle passe par le *score*, par la *notation*, par l'interface. -Ce glissement vers une archicration de plus en plus technique — que l’on pourrait qualifier d’*archicration cybernétique* — fusionne l’*arcalité systémique* (structures d’accès, d’interconnexion, de circulation) et la *cratialité informationnelle* (gestion des signaux, pilotage par données, ajustements en flux) dans un régime régulateur opaque, automatique, non réflexif. Le pouvoir tend à s’exercer moins comme rapport frontal que comme environnement. Il n’est plus négocié, ni même imposé : il est *codé*. Et cette codification, précisément parce qu’elle se prétend apolitique, neutre, fondée sur l’efficacité calculée et l’optimisation des flux, échappe à toute critique immanente. C’est là que réside son principal danger : ce n’est plus le pouvoir qui échappe au contrôle, c’est le contrôle lui-même qui se rend inaccessible, inlocalisable, ininterrogeable. +Ce glissement vers une archicration de plus en plus technique — que +l'on pourrait qualifier d'*archicration cybernétique* — fusionne +l'*arcalité systémique* (structures d'accès, d'interconnexion, de +circulation) et la *cratialité informationnelle* (gestion des signaux, +pilotage par données, ajustements en flux) dans un régime régulateur +opaque, automatique, non réflexif. Le pouvoir tend à s'exercer moins +comme rapport frontal que comme environnement. Il n'est plus négocié, ni +même imposé : il est *codé*. Et cette codification, précisément parce +qu'elle se prétend apolitique, neutre, fondée sur l'efficacité calculée +et l'optimisation des flux, échappe à toute critique immanente. C'est là +que réside son principal danger : ce n'est plus le pouvoir qui échappe +au contrôle, c'est le contrôle lui-même qui se rend inaccessible, +inlocalisable, ininterrogeable. -Dès lors, les premières figures critiques de cette configuration émergent comme des tentatives de réouverture du questionnement politique sur la régulation technique. En articulant leurs analyses autour des mutations de la normativité, de la modélisation et de la computationnalisation du social, ces penseurs ne se contentent pas de dénoncer un excès de pouvoir : ils mettent au jour un régime dans lequel la régulation elle-même devient un acte de dépossession silencieuse. Et c’est précisément cette dépossession régulatoire qui marque l’entrée dans une vulnérabilité nouvelle : non plus celle de l’individu face à la coercition, mais celle de la société face à l’autonomie technique de ses propres agencements. Le monde tend désormais à être régulé sans gouvernement assignable, administré sans être véritablement habité, optimisé sans être pleinement compris. C’est la forme extrême — et instable — de l’archicration dispersée. +Dès lors, les premières figures critiques de cette configuration +émergent comme des tentatives de réouverture du questionnement politique +sur la régulation technique. En articulant leurs analyses autour des +mutations de la normativité, de la modélisation et de la +computationnalisation du social, ces penseurs ne se contentent pas de +dénoncer un excès de pouvoir : ils mettent au jour un régime dans lequel +la régulation elle-même devient un acte de dépossession silencieuse. Et +c'est précisément cette dépossession régulatoire qui marque l'entrée +dans une vulnérabilité nouvelle : non plus celle de l'individu face à la +coercition, mais celle de la société face à l'autonomie technique de ses +propres agencements. Le monde tend désormais à être régulé sans +gouvernement assignable, administré sans être véritablement habité, +optimisé sans être pleinement compris. C'est la forme extrême — et +instable — de l'archicration dispersée. -Cette transformation, qui se veut opérationnelle, fluide et efficiente, n’est pourtant pas sans conséquences profondes sur la stabilité du monde qu’elle prétend gouverner. L’idéal cybernétique d’un pilotage sans friction, d’un ajustement constant des paramètres à partir de signaux en retour, d’une optimisation autoréférente par les flux eux-mêmes, repose sur un mythe implicite de l’homéostasie universelle : à savoir, que tout déséquilibre local serait compensable par le réajustement des autres éléments du système. Or, cette conception, héritée d’un imaginaire biologique appliqué au social, néglige un fait fondamental : les structures humaines, techniques et économiques ne sont pas des organismes, mais des configurations hétérogènes d’agents, de machines, de normes et de données, dont les interactions produisent des effets non-linéaires, imprédictibles et souvent irréversibles. +Cette transformation, qui se veut opérationnelle, fluide et efficiente, +n'est pourtant pas sans conséquences profondes sur la stabilité du monde +qu'elle prétend gouverner. L'idéal cybernétique d'un pilotage sans +friction, d'un ajustement constant des paramètres à partir de signaux en +retour, d'une optimisation autoréférente par les flux eux-mêmes, repose +sur un mythe implicite de l'homéostasie universelle : à savoir, que tout +déséquilibre local serait compensable par le réajustement des autres +éléments du système. Or, cette conception, héritée d'un imaginaire +biologique appliqué au social, néglige un fait fondamental : les +structures humaines, techniques et économiques ne sont pas des +organismes, mais des configurations hétérogènes d'agents, de machines, +de normes et de données, dont les interactions produisent des effets +non-linéaires, imprédictibles et souvent irréversibles. -Loin donc de pacifier les structures systémiques, la cybernétisation des régimes régulatoires inaugure une montée en complexité qui devient elle-même génératrice de vulnérabilité. Plus les dispositifs se veulent autorégulés, plus ils supposent une interdépendance des modules, des protocoles et des données ; et plus cette interdépendance devient opaque, plus elle expose les systèmes à des points de rupture soudains, invisibles, incontrôlables. Ce que Charles Perrow avait magistralement formulé dès 1984 dans *Normal Accidents* en forgeant le concept de *systèmes à couplage étroit* : dans ces configurations techniques, où la vitesse de réaction est supérieure à la vitesse de compréhension, toute défaillance locale, même minime, peut déclencher une réaction en chaîne potentiellement dévastatrice. Dans de tels systèmes, l’accident ne vient pas nécessairement d’un dehors imprévu ; il peut naître de la logique même du dispositif. +Loin donc de pacifier les structures systémiques, la cybernétisation des +régimes régulatoires inaugure une montée en complexité qui devient +elle-même génératrice de vulnérabilité. Plus les dispositifs se veulent +autorégulés, plus ils supposent une interdépendance des modules, des +protocoles et des données ; et plus cette interdépendance devient +opaque, plus elle expose les systèmes à des points de rupture soudains, +invisibles, incontrôlables. Ce que Charles Perrow avait magistralement +formulé dès 1984 dans *Normal Accidents* en forgeant le concept de +*systèmes à couplage étroit* : dans ces configurations techniques, où la +vitesse de réaction est supérieure à la vitesse de compréhension, toute +défaillance locale, même minime, peut déclencher une réaction en chaîne +potentiellement dévastatrice. Dans de tels systèmes, l'accident ne vient +pas nécessairement d'un dehors imprévu ; il peut naître de la logique +même du dispositif. -Ainsi, le dogme cybernétique de la résilience autoréglée se heurte à sa propre limite : celle de la non-circularité réelle du contrôle dans des systèmes à rétroaction différée, ou à propagation démultipliée. Dans la pratique contemporaine, cette vulnérabilité se manifeste dans des secteurs cruciaux tels que la finance algorithmique, la gestion logistique mondiale, ou la dépendance systémique aux infrastructures numériques. Les crashs boursiers “flash”, comme celui du 6 mai 2010 où le Dow Jones perdit brutalement près de 1000 points avant de se redresser en quelques minutes, incarnent ce seuil de déréalisation du pouvoir régulateur : ce ne sont plus les agents humains qui perdent le contrôle, mais les protocoles eux-mêmes qui entrent en résonance auto-destructrice. L’autorégulation vire à la panique mécanisée, et les garde-fous traditionnels — surveillance humaine, contrôle politique, amortisseurs juridiques — se révèlent impuissants face à des séquences qui se jouent à la microseconde. +Ainsi, le dogme cybernétique de la résilience autoréglée se heurte à sa +propre limite : celle de la non-circularité réelle du contrôle dans des +systèmes à rétroaction différée, ou à propagation démultipliée. Dans la +pratique contemporaine, cette vulnérabilité se manifeste dans des +secteurs cruciaux tels que la finance algorithmique, la gestion +logistique mondiale, ou la dépendance systémique aux infrastructures +numériques. Les crashs boursiers "flash", comme celui du 6 mai 2010 où +le Dow Jones perdit brutalement près de 1000 points avant de se +redresser en quelques minutes, incarnent ce seuil de déréalisation du +pouvoir régulateur : ce ne sont plus les agents humains qui perdent le +contrôle, mais les protocoles eux-mêmes qui entrent en résonance +auto-destructrice. L'autorégulation vire à la panique mécanisée, et les +garde-fous traditionnels — surveillance humaine, contrôle politique, +amortisseurs juridiques — se révèlent impuissants face à des séquences +qui se jouent à la microseconde. -Cette pathologie systémique n’est pas marginale, elle est structurelle. Car plus les architectures techniques sont construites sur la base de logiques d’optimisation maximale — just-in-time, lean, flux tendus, arbitrage automatisé — plus elles sacrifient les marges de sécurité, les redondances, les ralentissements, qui constituent pourtant les conditions minimales de toute régulation résiliente. La logique même de l’efficience, poussée à son extrémité cybernétique, engendre une *dérégulation interne* au sein du régime de régulation : non pas une absence de règles, mais une absence d’absorbance, d’inertie protectrice, d’espace d’adaptation. La régulation se fait tension intégrale — sans possibilité de relâche, sans soupape, sans mémoire. Ce que l’on nommait jadis amortisseur social devient dysfonctionnement tenu pour inefficient. Dès lors, la gouvernance sans garant se mue en gouvernance sans résistance : toute friction est bannie, tout ralentissement est suspect, tout délai est perçu comme défaillance. Mais cette fluidité imposée est précisément ce qui rend le système fragile. +Cette pathologie systémique n'est pas marginale, elle est structurelle. +Car plus les architectures techniques sont construites sur la base de +logiques d'optimisation maximale — just-in-time, lean, flux tendus, +arbitrage automatisé — plus elles sacrifient les marges de sécurité, +les redondances, les ralentissements, qui constituent pourtant les +conditions minimales de toute régulation résiliente. La logique même de +l'efficience, poussée à son extrémité cybernétique, engendre une +*dérégulation interne* au sein du régime de régulation : non pas une +absence de règles, mais une absence d'absorbance, d'inertie protectrice, +d'espace d'adaptation. La régulation se fait tension intégrale — sans +possibilité de relâche, sans soupape, sans mémoire. Ce que l'on nommait +jadis amortisseur social devient dysfonctionnement tenu pour +inefficient. Dès lors, la gouvernance sans garant se mue en gouvernance +sans résistance : toute friction est bannie, tout ralentissement est +suspect, tout délai est perçu comme défaillance. Mais cette fluidité +imposée est précisément ce qui rend le système fragile. -Ce déplacement est crucial dans notre perspective archicratique. Car il signifie que le pouvoir régulateur, en s’effaçant comme pouvoir *visible*, en se dissolvant dans les chaînes de signaux et les couches protocolaires, perd en même temps sa capacité d’assumer l’épreuve. Il y a de moins en moins de face-à-face régulatoire, de théâtre du dissensus et de conflictualité visible. Tout est anticipé, modélisé, corrigé à la marge. Mais lorsque l’imprévisible surgit — et il surgit toujours — le système se révèle nu : sans pilote, sans corps, sans garant. Cette absence de garant, que certains économistes libéraux présentent comme une vertu (le marché s’auto-régule, le réseau s’auto-organise), constitue en réalité une des failles majeures de l’archicration dispersée. Car sans garant clairement assignable, l’engagement, la responsabilité et la redevabilité tendent à se dissoudre. Il en résulte une chaîne de décisions sans décideur clairement assignable, d’effets sans cause aisément repérable et d’agencements où la responsabilité se diffracte. +Ce déplacement est crucial dans notre perspective archicratique. Car il +signifie que le pouvoir régulateur, en s'effaçant comme pouvoir +*visible*, en se dissolvant dans les chaînes de signaux et les couches +protocolaires, perd en même temps sa capacité d'assumer l'épreuve. Il y +a de moins en moins de face-à-face régulatoire, de théâtre du dissensus +et de conflictualité visible. Tout est anticipé, modélisé, corrigé à la +marge. Mais lorsque l'imprévisible surgit — et il surgit toujours — le système se révèle nu : sans pilote, sans corps, sans garant. Cette +absence de garant, que certains économistes libéraux présentent comme +une vertu (le marché s'auto-régule, le réseau s'auto-organise), +constitue en réalité une des failles majeures de l'archicration +dispersée. Car sans garant clairement assignable, l'engagement, la +responsabilité et la redevabilité tendent à se dissoudre. Il en résulte +une chaîne de décisions sans décideur clairement assignable, d'effets +sans cause aisément repérable et d'agencements où la responsabilité se +diffracte. -C’est cela, le cœur de la crise critique de la fin de la troisième révolution industrielle : non pas une absence de pouvoir, mais un excès de régulation à garant effacé, à scène rendue difficilement praticable, à institution affaiblie. Une régulation où le politique est effacé, non pas parce qu’il serait obsolète, mais parce qu’il est devenu illisible dans l’opacité même des systèmes régulateurs. Ce brouillage est la condition même de la montée des fragilités systémiques, et, comme nous le verrons, de la résurgence de figures de dissensus radical, souvent invisibilisées, parfois expulsées, mais toujours ré-inventrices d’une autre scène du possible. +C'est cela, le cœur de la crise critique de la fin de la troisième +révolution industrielle : non pas une absence de pouvoir, mais un excès +de régulation à garant effacé, à scène rendue difficilement praticable, +à institution affaiblie. Une régulation où le politique est effacé, non +pas parce qu'il serait obsolète, mais parce qu'il est devenu illisible +dans l'opacité même des systèmes régulateurs. Ce brouillage est la +condition même de la montée des fragilités systémiques, et, comme nous +le verrons, de la résurgence de figures de dissensus radical, souvent +invisibilisées, parfois expulsées, mais toujours ré-inventrices d'une +autre scène du possible. -Cette instabilité technique a des conséquences sociales majeures. Loin d’être un effet secondaire de la régulation algorithmique, la précarisation des existences devient l’un de ses opérateurs fondamentaux. À mesure que le pouvoir se loge dans les chaînes d’automatisation, dans les logiques d’optimisation permanente, dans les modèles économétriques et les grilles de performance abstraites, il cesse de s’exercer sur des sujets ancrés dans des corps, des trajectoires ou des appartenances, pour cibler des entités désubjectivées, mathématisées, codifiées selon des scores, des profils, des matrices de comportement. +Cette instabilité technique a des conséquences sociales majeures. Loin +d'être un effet secondaire de la régulation algorithmique, la +précarisation des existences devient l'un de ses opérateurs +fondamentaux. À mesure que le pouvoir se loge dans les chaînes +d'automatisation, dans les logiques d'optimisation permanente, dans les +modèles économétriques et les grilles de performance abstraites, il +cesse de s'exercer sur des sujets ancrés dans des corps, des +trajectoires ou des appartenances, pour cibler des entités +désubjectivées, mathématisées, codifiées selon des scores, des profils, +des matrices de comportement. -La régulation néolibérale de type cybernétique, fondée sur des indicateurs quantitatifs et des normes flottantes, produit ainsi un double effacement : celui du garant (comme nous l’avons vu précédemment), mais aussi celui du sujet. Le sujet de droit, porteur de revendications, de mémoire et de récit, tend à laisser place au *profil de performance*, à la *note de risque*, à l’avatar numérique objectivé par des séries corrélées. Ce qui est évalué n’est plus un acte mais une tendance ; ce qui est jugé n’est plus un comportement singulier, mais un motif ; ce qui est gouverné n’est plus un collectif, mais un nuage de données. Il ne s’agit plus de s’intégrer à un compromis social — il s’agit d’être compatible avec une architecture régulatoire à centre diffus. +La régulation néolibérale de type cybernétique, fondée sur des +indicateurs quantitatifs et des normes flottantes, produit ainsi un +double effacement : celui du garant (comme nous l'avons vu +précédemment), mais aussi celui du sujet. Le sujet de droit, porteur de +revendications, de mémoire et de récit, tend à laisser place au *profil +de performance*, à la *note de risque*, à l'avatar numérique objectivé +par des séries corrélées. Ce qui est évalué n'est plus un acte mais une +tendance ; ce qui est jugé n'est plus un comportement singulier, mais un +motif ; ce qui est gouverné n'est plus un collectif, mais un nuage de +données. Il ne s'agit plus de s'intégrer à un compromis social — il +s'agit d'être compatible avec une architecture régulatoire à centre +diffus. -La figure paradigmatique de cette cratialité déterritorialisée est le travailleur ubérisé. Sa situation incarne à la perfection le glissement du rapport social vers un pilotage algorithmique de la force productive. Son emploi n’est pas encadré par un contrat stable, mais conditionné par une plateforme opaque, qui module en temps réel l’offre et la demande selon des modèles prédictifs. Sa rémunération n’est pas négociée mais calculée à partir de critères volatils, modulables, invisibles. Son comportement est évalué en continu par des notations biaisées, qui mêlent appréciations subjectives, critères automatisés, et mécanismes d’autocontrôle intériorisé. Il n’a ni bureau, ni syndicat, ni scène de représentation stable : il devient l’archétype du travailleur piloté à distance, livré aux flux, piloté par des interfaces, soumis à une gouvernance algorithmique sans instance délibérative. +La figure paradigmatique de cette cratialité déterritorialisée est le +travailleur ubérisé. Sa situation incarne à la perfection le glissement +du rapport social vers un pilotage algorithmique de la force productive. +Son emploi n'est pas encadré par un contrat stable, mais conditionné par +une plateforme opaque, qui module en temps réel l'offre et la demande +selon des modèles prédictifs. Sa rémunération n'est pas négociée mais +calculée à partir de critères volatils, modulables, invisibles. Son +comportement est évalué en continu par des notations biaisées, qui +mêlent appréciations subjectives, critères automatisés, et mécanismes +d'autocontrôle intériorisé. Il n'a ni bureau, ni syndicat, ni scène de +représentation stable : il devient l'archétype du travailleur piloté à +distance, livré aux flux, piloté par des interfaces, soumis à une +gouvernance algorithmique sans instance délibérative. -Mais cette transformation ne concerne pas uniquement le monde du travail. Elle affecte l’ensemble des sphères de la vie sociale. L’accès aux droits sociaux, au logement, à la santé, à l’éducation, passe de plus en plus par des systèmes de notation, de scoring, d’éligibilité automatisée. Les programmes de welfare sont gérés par des logiciels prédictifs qui identifient les bénéficiaires sur la base de critères corrélatifs, non pas éthiques, ni politiques, ni juridiques, mais statistiques. Cette logique produit une automatisation de l’exclusion — un mécanisme de discrimination automatisée qui se présente comme neutre. Comme l’a montré Virginia Eubanks dans *Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor* (2018), les algorithmes utilisés par les agences sociales aux États-Unis — notamment pour la gestion des aides au logement, des prestations sociales ou de l’assistance à l’enfance — reproduisent et amplifient les inégalités structurelles, en ciblant les individus les plus précaires avec des critères biaisés, et en les excluant de l’aide publique sous couvert d’objectivité technique. +Mais cette transformation ne concerne pas uniquement le monde du +travail. Elle affecte l'ensemble des sphères de la vie sociale. L'accès +aux droits sociaux, au logement, à la santé, à l'éducation, passe de +plus en plus par des systèmes de notation, de scoring, d'éligibilité +automatisée. Les programmes de welfare sont gérés par des logiciels +prédictifs qui identifient les bénéficiaires sur la base de critères +corrélatifs, non pas éthiques, ni politiques, ni juridiques, mais +statistiques. Cette logique produit une automatisation de l'exclusion — un mécanisme de discrimination automatisée qui se présente comme +neutre. Comme l'a montré Virginia Eubanks dans *Automating Inequality: +How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor* (2018), les +algorithmes utilisés par les agences sociales aux États-Unis — notamment pour la gestion des aides au logement, des prestations +sociales ou de l'assistance à l'enfance — reproduisent et amplifient +les inégalités structurelles, en ciblant les individus les plus +précaires avec des critères biaisés, et en les excluant de l'aide +publique sous couvert d'objectivité technique. -Ce que cette critique met en lumière, c’est que l’archicration dispersée ne fonctionne pas par violence explicite ou répression frontale. Elle opère par effacement : effacement du politique, effacement du sujet, effacement du dissensus. Elle n’interdit pas toujours frontalement ; elle disqualifie, note, corrèle et trie à distance. La norme n’est plus énoncée ; elle est *inférée*. La valeur n’est plus négociée ; elle est *calculée*. Le statut d’un individu n’est plus le résultat d’un processus politique ou juridique, mais la sortie d’un algorithme, d’un modèle prédictif, d’une formule opaque. C’est là l’une des ruses les plus pernicieuses du nouveau régime archicratique : sous couvert de neutralité technique, il opère une régulation par invisibilisation — en éliminant toute scène de reconnaissance, tout espace de contradiction, tout cadre d’énonciation commune. +Ce que cette critique met en lumière, c'est que l'archicration dispersée +ne fonctionne pas par violence explicite ou répression frontale. Elle +opère par effacement : effacement du politique, effacement du sujet, +effacement du dissensus. Elle n'interdit pas toujours frontalement ; +elle disqualifie, note, corrèle et trie à distance. La norme n'est plus +énoncée ; elle est *inférée*. La valeur n'est plus négociée ; elle est +*calculée*. Le statut d'un individu n'est plus le résultat d'un +processus politique ou juridique, mais la sortie d'un algorithme, d'un +modèle prédictif, d'une formule opaque. C'est là l'une des ruses les +plus pernicieuses du nouveau régime archicratique : sous couvert de +neutralité technique, il opère une régulation par invisibilisation — en éliminant toute scène de reconnaissance, tout espace de +contradiction, tout cadre d'énonciation commune. -Cette invisibilisation ne fait pas disparaître les inégalités : elle les rend indiscutables. Pire encore, elle transforme l’inégalité en variable d’entrée du système. Car ce qui compte, dans le monde régulé par les données, ce n’est pas ce que l’on est, mais ce que l’on *préfigure*. Or, les modèles prédictifs sont construits sur des bases historiques biaisées : si les minorités ont été discriminées par le passé, elles le seront davantage par les systèmes d’IA ; si les pauvres ont été plus surveillés, ils le seront de manière accrue par les nouveaux dispositifs automatisés. Ainsi, la régulation numérique reconduit les oppressions moins par ignorance que par efficacité systémique. Le dissensus n’est pas seulement nié : il tend à être absorbé dans l’algorithme comme déviance à corriger. C’est le point-limite de la cratialité informationnelle et de l’arcalité cybernétique : leur jonction produit une archicration qui domine moins par frontalité que par anticipation, orientation et élimination différentielle. +Cette invisibilisation ne fait pas disparaître les inégalités : elle les +rend indiscutables. Pire encore, elle transforme l'inégalité en variable +d'entrée du système. Car ce qui compte, dans le monde régulé par les +données, ce n'est pas ce que l'on est, mais ce que l'on *préfigure*. Or, +les modèles prédictifs sont construits sur des bases historiques +biaisées : si les minorités ont été discriminées par le passé, elles le +seront davantage par les systèmes d'IA ; si les pauvres ont été plus +surveillés, ils le seront de manière accrue par les nouveaux dispositifs +automatisés. Ainsi, la régulation numérique reconduit les oppressions +moins par ignorance que par efficacité systémique. Le dissensus n'est +pas seulement nié : il tend à être absorbé dans l'algorithme comme +déviance à corriger. C'est le point-limite de la cratialité +informationnelle et de l'arcalité cybernétique : leur jonction produit +une archicration qui domine moins par frontalité que par anticipation, +orientation et élimination différentielle. -Ce n’est donc pas seulement une transformation des outils ou des modes de gouvernement, c’est une transformation anthropologique de la scène politique elle-même. Le monde social cesse d’être un lieu de reconnaissance mutuelle pour devenir un champ de compatibilité calculée. Ce qui se perd dans cette transition, ce n’est pas seulement le contrat, la loi, ou l’institution — c’est la possibilité même d’un regard, d’un conflit, d’une altérité. Elle tend moins à réprimer frontalement le dissensus qu’à le dissoudre dans les flux, et moins à combattre le sujet qu’à le décomposer en variables. Et pourtant, malgré cette puissance de dissolution, des figures de résistance émergent, qui viennent précisément révéler les limites internes, les points de rupture, les failles ontologiques de cette archicration dispersée. Là où la scène politique semble effacée, déterritorialisée et rendue silencieuse, se manifeste une volonté tenace de réactivation du dissensus, de réinscription des subjectivités, de réaffirmation de la conflictualité comme condition même du politique. Ces contre-pouvoirs, aussi fragmentaires soient-ils, opèrent comme des déchirures dans le tissu lisse de la régulation cybernétique. +Ce n'est donc pas seulement une transformation des outils ou des modes +de gouvernement, c'est une transformation anthropologique de la scène +politique elle-même. Le monde social cesse d'être un lieu de +reconnaissance mutuelle pour devenir un champ de compatibilité calculée. +Ce qui se perd dans cette transition, ce n'est pas seulement le contrat, +la loi, ou l'institution — c'est la possibilité même d'un regard, d'un +conflit, d'une altérité. Elle tend moins à réprimer frontalement le +dissensus qu'à le dissoudre dans les flux, et moins à combattre le sujet +qu'à le décomposer en variables. Et pourtant, malgré cette puissance de +dissolution, des figures de résistance émergent, qui viennent +précisément révéler les limites internes, les points de rupture, les +failles ontologiques de cette archicration dispersée. Là où la scène +politique semble effacée, déterritorialisée et rendue silencieuse, se +manifeste une volonté tenace de réactivation du dissensus, de +réinscription des subjectivités, de réaffirmation de la conflictualité +comme condition même du politique. Ces contre-pouvoirs, aussi +fragmentaires soient-ils, opèrent comme des déchirures dans le tissu +lisse de la régulation cybernétique. -Les premières de ces figures critiques surgissent à l’intérieur même du monde numérique, là où le pouvoir semblait s’être entièrement logé. Les hackers, par exemple, loin d’être de simples saboteurs techniciens, incarnent une forme de contre-régulation technique : ils redéploient la compétence technique contre l’ordre institué, ils subvertissent les architectures fermées, ils rouvrent des potentialités là où tout semblait refermé. L’acte de *jailbreaking*, le développement de logiciels libres, le refus de l’obfuscation propriétaire, tous participent d’une même tension politique : restituer au geste humain sa capacité d’intervention, son droit à la modification, son aptitude à la désobéissance. Le mouvement du logiciel libre, théorisé dès les années 1980 par Richard Stallman, puis prolongé dans l’écosystème Linux ou GNU, n’est pas un simple choix technique : c’est une position normative forte. Elle affirme que l’architecture du pouvoir peut et doit être discutée, rendue transparente et modifiable. La régulation, pour être légitime, doit pouvoir être contestée. +Les premières de ces figures critiques surgissent à l'intérieur même du +monde numérique, là où le pouvoir semblait s'être entièrement logé. Les +hackers, par exemple, loin d'être de simples saboteurs techniciens, +incarnent une forme de contre-régulation technique : ils redéploient la +compétence technique contre l'ordre institué, ils subvertissent les +architectures fermées, ils rouvrent des potentialités là où tout +semblait refermé. L'acte de *jailbreaking*, le développement de +logiciels libres, le refus de l'obfuscation propriétaire, tous +participent d'une même tension politique : restituer au geste humain sa +capacité d'intervention, son droit à la modification, son aptitude à la +désobéissance. Le mouvement du logiciel libre, théorisé dès les années +1980 par Richard Stallman, puis prolongé dans l'écosystème Linux ou GNU, +n'est pas un simple choix technique : c'est une position normative +forte. Elle affirme que l'architecture du pouvoir peut et doit être +discutée, rendue transparente et modifiable. La régulation, pour être +légitime, doit pouvoir être contestée. -Cette tension s’amplifie dans les mobilisations de la décennie 2010. Les révélations d’Edward Snowden en 2013 sur la surveillance de masse pratiquée par la NSA, en connivence avec les grandes entreprises du numérique, marquent un tournant : elles mettent en lumière que le pouvoir algorithmique, loin d’être simplement désincarné, est soutenu par des dispositifs militaires, sécuritaires et industriels. Le numérique n’est pas neutre ; il est armé. Dès lors, les luttes contre la surveillance ne sont pas seulement des luttes pour la vie privée, mais pour la ré-institution du politique : il ne s’agit pas seulement de cacher ses données, mais de réaffirmer son droit à l’opacité, à l’inconnu, à la non-prédiction. +Cette tension s'amplifie dans les mobilisations de la décennie 2010. Les +révélations d'Edward Snowden en 2013 sur la surveillance de masse +pratiquée par la NSA, en connivence avec les grandes entreprises du +numérique, marquent un tournant : elles mettent en lumière que le +pouvoir algorithmique, loin d'être simplement désincarné, est soutenu +par des dispositifs militaires, sécuritaires et industriels. Le +numérique n'est pas neutre ; il est armé. Dès lors, les luttes contre la +surveillance ne sont pas seulement des luttes pour la vie privée, mais +pour la ré-institution du politique : il ne s'agit pas seulement de +cacher ses données, mais de réaffirmer son droit à l'opacité, à +l'inconnu, à la non-prédiction. -De même, les mouvements d’occupation — ZAD, places occupées, collectifs antipub, collectifs antitraçage — posent de nouvelles scènes de contestation. Là où l’archicration dispersée efface la scène, ils la réinstallent. Là où la régulation se voulait fluide, ils réintroduisent des points d’arrêt et de confrontation. Là où tout devenait profil, ils posent des visages, des voix, des corps. La place, la cabane, le collectif deviennent des micro-institutions critiques, des espaces d’épreuve réciproque, où l’on tente de redéfinir, dans et contre le monde numérique, ce que pourrait être une régulation vraiment politique. +De même, les mouvements d'occupation — ZAD, places occupées, +collectifs antipub, collectifs antitraçage — posent de nouvelles +scènes de contestation. Là où l'archicration dispersée efface la scène, +ils la réinstallent. Là où la régulation se voulait fluide, ils +réintroduisent des points d'arrêt et de confrontation. Là où tout +devenait profil, ils posent des visages, des voix, des corps. La place, +la cabane, le collectif deviennent des micro-institutions critiques, des +espaces d'épreuve réciproque, où l'on tente de redéfinir, dans et contre +le monde numérique, ce que pourrait être une régulation vraiment +politique. -Il serait toutefois naïf de croire que ces résistances suffisent à renverser le régime archicratique contemporain. Leur puissance est réelle, mais leur fragilité l’est aussi. Elles sont souvent dispersées, précaires, éphémères. Elles peinent à trouver une articulation durable, à construire un cadre commun, à se doter d’une légitimité alternative. Mais elles révèlent quelque chose d’essentiel : que la régulation, si totalisante soit-elle, n’est jamais achevée. Qu’elle comporte toujours ses points de fuite, ses zones de friction, ses lieux d’hétérogénéité. +Il serait toutefois naïf de croire que ces résistances suffisent à +renverser le régime archicratique contemporain. Leur puissance est +réelle, mais leur fragilité l'est aussi. Elles sont souvent dispersées, +précaires, éphémères. Elles peinent à trouver une articulation durable, +à construire un cadre commun, à se doter d'une légitimité alternative. +Mais elles révèlent quelque chose d'essentiel : que la régulation, si +totalisante soit-elle, n'est jamais achevée. Qu'elle comporte toujours +ses points de fuite, ses zones de friction, ses lieux d'hétérogénéité. -En ce sens, la fin de la troisième révolution industrielle n’est pas seulement le moment de la généralisation du contrôle, mais aussi celui de la réouverture du conflit. Ce que produit la saturation de l’algorithme, ce n’est pas uniquement une soumission parfaite, c’est une saturation du sens. Et cette saturation devient la condition d’un nouveau désir politique : celui de réinstaurer une scène. Une scène du visible, de l’énonçable et du commun, où la norme serait à nouveau exposée, discutée, confrontée, et non plus simplement calculée. +En ce sens, la fin de la troisième révolution industrielle n'est pas +seulement le moment de la généralisation du contrôle, mais aussi celui +de la réouverture du conflit. Ce que produit la saturation de +l'algorithme, ce n'est pas uniquement une soumission parfaite, c'est une +saturation du sens. Et cette saturation devient la condition d'un +nouveau désir politique : celui de réinstaurer une scène. Une scène du +visible, de l'énonçable et du commun, où la norme serait à nouveau +exposée, discutée, confrontée, et non plus simplement calculée. -C’est cette tension fondamentale, cette dialectique entre saturation et réouverture, qui annonce, en creux, les enjeux de la quatrième révolution industrielle. Car ce qui vient ensuite, ce n’est pas une simple continuation, c’est un nouveau seuil : l’effacement tendanciel de la scène elle-même, la dissolution de l’épreuve, la réduction drastique des possibilités d’extériorité régulatrice : ce que nous nommons l’*archicration oblitérée.* C’est là que nous mènera, dans sa pleine lucidité, la prochaine section. Retenons pour l’instant ceci : la fin de la troisième révolution industrielle a produit une régulation cybernétique qui, en prétendant tout gouverner, a fini par révéler ses propres fissures — techniques, sociales et politiques. Et dans ces fissures se logent les germes d’un autre possible. +C'est cette tension fondamentale, cette dialectique entre saturation et +réouverture, qui annonce, en creux, les enjeux de la quatrième +révolution industrielle. Car ce qui vient ensuite, ce n'est pas une +simple continuation, c'est un nouveau seuil : l'effacement tendanciel de +la scène elle-même, la dissolution de l'épreuve, la réduction drastique +des possibilités d'extériorité régulatrice : ce que nous nommons +l'*archicration oblitérée.* C'est là que nous mènera, dans sa pleine +lucidité, la prochaine section. Retenons pour l'instant ceci : la fin de +la troisième révolution industrielle a produit une régulation +cybernétique qui, en prétendant tout gouverner, a fini par révéler ses +propres fissures — techniques, sociales et politiques. Et dans ces +fissures se logent les germes d'un autre possible. ## **4.5 — Quatrième révolution industrielle (2010–2025) : bio-algocratie et archicration oblitérée** -Ce qui s’ouvre au tournant du XXIe siècle est un prolongement logique de la révolution cybernétique engagée dans les décennies précédentes, mais avec un basculement de régime — un renversement murmuré dans les modalités mêmes de la régulation. Tandis que les réseaux, les données et les interfaces avaient, jusqu’alors, tissé l’armature d’une gouvernementalité distribuée et automatisée (section 4.4), un phénomène plus insidieux encore se met en place : la régulation se déleste progressivement de toute scène visible, de tout sujet identifiable, de toute épreuve collective, au profit d’une architecture de plus en plus oblitérée. Il s’agit de les formater en amont, de les aligner sur des grilles d’optimisation avant même qu’ils ne prennent forme dans l’action. Le monde régulé devient alors celui de la présélection, de l’exclusion anticipée et du signal faible interprété comme profil de risque. +Ce qui s'ouvre au tournant du XXIe siècle est un prolongement logique de +la révolution cybernétique engagée dans les décennies précédentes, mais +avec un basculement de régime — un renversement murmuré dans les +modalités mêmes de la régulation. Tandis que les réseaux, les données et +les interfaces avaient, jusqu'alors, tissé l'armature d'une +gouvernementalité distribuée et automatisée (section 4.4), un phénomène +plus insidieux encore se met en place : la régulation se déleste +progressivement de toute scène visible, de tout sujet identifiable, de +toute épreuve collective, au profit d'une architecture de plus en plus +oblitérée. Il s'agit de les formater en amont, de les aligner sur des +grilles d'optimisation avant même qu'ils ne prennent forme dans +l'action. Le monde régulé devient alors celui de la présélection, de +l'exclusion anticipée et du signal faible interprété comme profil de +risque. -Ce moment historique correspond à ce que nous devons désigner comme l’émergence d’un régime bio-algocratique, c’est-à-dire une configuration dans laquelle les mécanismes d’anticipation, de normalisation et d’ajustement comportemental s’opèrent à travers des architectures numériques opaques, des mécanismes prédictifs d’intelligence artificielle, et des interfaces d’influence imperceptible — le tout inscrit dans les processus biologiques, cognitifs, affectifs, attentionnels des sujets eux-mêmes. Cette nouvelle arcalité, qui n’est plus spatiale, ni disciplinaire, ni même systémique au sens classique, prend la forme d’une *infrastructure invisible*, dont la fonction n’est pas tant de limiter ou d’interdire que de guider, *orienter*, *conditionner*, sans qu’aucune trace d’autorité ne demeure. C’est là l’essence de l’archicration oblitérée : non pas une absence de régulation, mais une régulation par effacement de sa propre scène. +Ce moment historique correspond à ce que nous devons désigner comme +l'émergence d'un régime bio-algocratique, c'est-à-dire une configuration +dans laquelle les mécanismes d'anticipation, de normalisation et +d'ajustement comportemental s'opèrent à travers des architectures +numériques opaques, des mécanismes prédictifs d'intelligence +artificielle, et des interfaces d'influence imperceptible — le tout +inscrit dans les processus biologiques, cognitifs, affectifs, +attentionnels des sujets eux-mêmes. Cette nouvelle arcalité, qui n'est +plus spatiale, ni disciplinaire, ni même systémique au sens classique, +prend la forme d'une *infrastructure invisible*, dont la fonction n'est +pas tant de limiter ou d'interdire que de guider, *orienter*, +*conditionner*, sans qu'aucune trace d'autorité ne demeure. C'est là +l'essence de l'archicration oblitérée : non pas une absence de +régulation, mais une régulation par effacement de sa propre scène. -C’est précisément ce que révèle la montée des *nudge units*, des systèmes de *scoring social*, des *assistants IA intégrés*, des *recommandations comportementales*, des *publicités ciblées à la milliseconde* : tous ces dispositifs ne visent pas à produire du consensus explicite, ni même de l’obéissance formelle, mais une adhésion anticipée, un *réglage des trajectoires possibles*, une anticipation silencieuse des bifurcations décisionnelles. Le pouvoir ne parle plus : il *fait parler l’interface*. Il ne commande plus : il *influence les conditions de réaction*. Et cette influence ne se reconnaît plus dans aucune institution, ni dans aucun agent. Elle agit à travers des algorithmes, des architectures de choix, des parcours utilisateurs, des courbes d’attention et des profils d’usage. L’archicration y tend à fonctionner comme une régulation dont le régulateur devient de moins en moins assignable. +C'est précisément ce que révèle la montée des *nudge units*, des +systèmes de *scoring social*, des *assistants IA intégrés*, des +*recommandations comportementales*, des *publicités ciblées à la +milliseconde* : tous ces dispositifs ne visent pas à produire du +consensus explicite, ni même de l'obéissance formelle, mais une adhésion +anticipée, un *réglage des trajectoires possibles*, une anticipation +silencieuse des bifurcations décisionnelles. Le pouvoir ne parle plus : +il *fait parler l'interface*. Il ne commande plus : il *influence les +conditions de réaction*. Et cette influence ne se reconnaît plus dans +aucune institution, ni dans aucun agent. Elle agit à travers des +algorithmes, des architectures de choix, des parcours utilisateurs, des +courbes d'attention et des profils d'usage. L'archicration y tend à +fonctionner comme une régulation dont le régulateur devient de moins en +moins assignable. -Dans ce contexte, le retrait relatif de l’État — amorcé avec le néolibéralisme des années 1980 mais accéléré par la financiarisation, la numérisation, puis la plateformisation du monde — ne signifie pas la disparition du pouvoir régulateur, mais son transfert vers des dispositifs techniques transnationaux, privés, automatisés. Le marché algorithmique, la logique des KPI et l’horizon de l’efficacité comportementale remplacent l’idéal de la loi commune. Ce n’est pas l’anomie ; c’est une sur-régulation sans visage. Une sur-régulation sans délibération. Une *normativité latente*, incorporée, prescriptive, *d’autant plus puissante qu’elle se rend imperceptible*. Autrement dit, le monde tend à être gouverné sans que le gouvernement puisse encore être clairement rapporté à une instance identifiable. +Dans ce contexte, le retrait relatif de l'État — amorcé avec le +néolibéralisme des années 1980 mais accéléré par la financiarisation, la +numérisation, puis la plateformisation du monde — ne signifie pas la +disparition du pouvoir régulateur, mais son transfert vers des +dispositifs techniques transnationaux, privés, automatisés. Le marché +algorithmique, la logique des KPI et l'horizon de l'efficacité +comportementale remplacent l'idéal de la loi commune. Ce n'est pas +l'anomie ; c'est une sur-régulation sans visage. Une sur-régulation sans +délibération. Une *normativité latente*, incorporée, prescriptive, +*d'autant plus puissante qu'elle se rend imperceptible*. Autrement dit, +le monde tend à être gouverné sans que le gouvernement puisse encore +être clairement rapporté à une instance identifiable. -Cette mutation n’est pas anodine pour notre thèse sur l’archicratie. Elle en constitue l’une des inflexions critiques majeures, car elle pousse à son point limite l’hypothèse que nous travaillons depuis le début de cet essai : la régulation n’a pas besoin d’un lieu, ni même d’un sujet, pour opérer comme pouvoir effectif. Ce qui faisait la force des régimes archicratiques précédents — leur articulation visible entre dispositifs, institutions et représentations — se dissout ici dans une régulation de plus en plus détachée des formes classiques de représentation, dans laquelle le pouvoir n’a plus besoin de se dire pour agir. +Cette mutation n'est pas anodine pour notre thèse sur l'archicratie. +Elle en constitue l'une des inflexions critiques majeures, car elle +pousse à son point limite l'hypothèse que nous travaillons depuis le +début de cet essai : la régulation n'a pas besoin d'un lieu, ni même +d'un sujet, pour opérer comme pouvoir effectif. Ce qui faisait la force +des régimes archicratiques précédents — leur articulation visible +entre dispositifs, institutions et représentations — se dissout ici +dans une régulation de plus en plus détachée des formes classiques de +représentation, dans laquelle le pouvoir n'a plus besoin de se dire pour +agir. -Nous analyserons cette transformation sous trois angles complémentaires : d’abord comme arcalité invisible, ensuite comme cratialité anticipatoire, enfin comme archicration effacée, c’est-à-dire comme modèle de régulation largement automatisé, sans scène, sans parole, sans garant, et donc paradoxalement difficile à éprouver. +Nous analyserons cette transformation sous trois angles complémentaires +: d'abord comme arcalité invisible, ensuite comme cratialité +anticipatoire, enfin comme archicration effacée, c'est-à-dire comme +modèle de régulation largement automatisé, sans scène, sans parole, sans +garant, et donc paradoxalement difficile à éprouver. -Les cas emblématiques que nous mobiliserons pour clore ce sous-chapitre — du crédit social chinois aux nudges comportementaux en passant par les régimes de gouvernance des plateformes numériques — nous permettront de constater que la cinquième révolution régulatoire, en germe, ne naît pas de l’innovation technologique, mais d’une transformation radicale du régime de visibilité et de conflictualité. En ce sens, la bio-algocratie n’est pas simplement une modalité du pouvoir : elle est son retrait organisé. +Les cas emblématiques que nous mobiliserons pour clore ce sous-chapitre — du crédit social chinois aux nudges comportementaux en passant par +les régimes de gouvernance des plateformes numériques — nous +permettront de constater que la cinquième révolution régulatoire, en +germe, ne naît pas de l'innovation technologique, mais d'une +transformation radicale du régime de visibilité et de conflictualité. En +ce sens, la bio-algocratie n'est pas simplement une modalité du pouvoir +: elle est son retrait organisé. ### **4.5.1 — *Arcalité invisible* : architecture numérique, infrastructure mondiale opaque** -Ce qui caractérise l’arcalité propre à la phase bio-algocratique n’est plus la visibilité des infrastructures ni leur extériorité tangible, mais leur intégration silencieuse dans l’usage. L’arcalité contemporaine ne s’abolit pas ; elle se loge désormais dans les objets, les interfaces et les environnements numériques, d’autant plus efficacement qu’elle échappe à l’intuition commune. Elle n’impose plus frontalement ; elle préconfigure les conditions de l’agir. Le smartphone en offre l’exemple paradigmatique : non comme simple outil, mais comme opérateur d’arcalité capable de localiser, synchroniser, trier et moduler l’ensemble des interactions ordinaires. Ce déplacement de la régulation vers la logique du service est encore renforcé par le récit technolibéral de la transparence : l’interface simple et conviviale dissimule en réalité les chaînes de collecte, d’interopérabilité et de hiérarchisation qui structurent les usages. La conséquence politique majeure en est la difficulté croissante à identifier le pouvoir comme tel : la régulation n’est pas moins présente ; elle est davantage intégrée aux conditions mêmes de l’action. - -Cette invisibilisation a une conséquence politique décisive : elle rend le pouvoir plus difficile à identifier comme tel. Là où les régimes modernes articulaient encore légitimité de l’autorité et possibilité de sa mise en question, la régulation bio-algocratique tend à prévenir le dissensus en amont, en l’intégrant aux conditions mêmes de l’action. Le pouvoir n’est pas moins présent qu’auparavant ; il est plus profondément enfoui dans les milieux de vie, et d’autant plus efficace qu’il se présente comme simple facilitation. - -À mesure qu’elle se retire de l’expérience ordinaire, l’arcalité contemporaine s’intensifie à l’échelle planétaire sous la forme d’architectures numériques distribuées. Le paradoxe est décisif : plus ces infrastructures structurent la vie sociale, cognitive et politique, moins elles sont perçues. Là où les réseaux ferroviaires, les plans d’urbanisme ou les grands travaux d’État inscrivaient visiblement le pouvoir dans l’espace, l’infrastructure numérique opère selon un régime d’opacité : câbles sous-marins, data centers, serveurs racines et infrastructures de cloud, protocoles de routage et standards interconnectés composent une géopolitique matérielle de la régulation sans centre immédiatement identifiable ni scène critique unifiée. L’espace numérique ne relève donc pas d’une pure abstraction : il est massivement territorialisé dans ses supports, mais politiquement dérobé dans ses modes d’effectuation. - -Les câbles sous-marins, qui acheminent l’essentiel du trafic Internet mondial, constituent un exemple paradigmatique de cette arcalité invisible. Infrastructures stratégiques, opérées par un nombre restreint d’acteurs privés ou hybrides, ils forment la charpente réelle de l’espace numérique tout en échappant largement au regard public et à la délibération démocratique. Leur matérialité est massive ; leur régime de pouvoir, largement opaque. - -Les data centers prolongent cette logique. Loin d’être de simples entrepôts d’information, ils constituent des nœuds de stockage, de traitement, de hiérarchisation et de corrélation qui conditionnent concrètement ce qui sera visible, accessible, recommandé, priorisé ou relégué. En ce sens, ils participent directement à la configuration pratique du réel. - -Cette matérialité de l’arcalité invisible est redoublée par une architecture logique de protocoles — TCP/IP, DNS, BGP, HTTPS — dont les standards sont élaborés dans des espaces techniques largement soustraits aux cadres politiques classiques. L’opacité n’y est pas accidentelle : elle est constitutive. L’utilisateur accède à des interfaces ; les couches décisives de la régulation lui demeurent hermétiques. Le pouvoir est ici moins simplement caché que difficile à totaliser dans une scène unique, parce qu’il est distribué, fragmenté et hautement technique. - -C’est là le cœur de l’arcalité invisible : une régulation diffractée dans les objets, les couches protocolaires et les infrastructures distantes, qui détermine profondément les conditions d’accès, de visibilité, de participation et de reconnaissance sans se laisser aisément localiser dans une scène politique identifiable. Elle produit ainsi un monde techniquement opérable, mais politiquement difficile à lire. - -L’un des traits les plus pernicieux de cette arcalité invisible réside dans l’effacement progressif des médiations politiques, sociales et symboliques au profit d’une régulation présentée comme technique, neutre et fonctionnelle. À mesure que la gouvernance s’automatise par le biais de l’infrastructure, elle se soustrait aux formes instituées du débat, de la représentation et de la délibération. Le pouvoir ne disparaît pas : il est recodé sous forme d’exigences techniques, de procédures sécuritaires, de standards interopérables et de normes d’efficacité. Il devient d’autant plus difficile à traiter politiquement qu’il se présente désormais comme déjà préfiguré dans l’architecture même des dispositifs. - -Ce processus d’effacement ne s’opère pas frontalement, mais par glissement progressif des fonctions régulatrices vers des dispositifs techniques autojustifiés. L’exemple paradigmatique en est fourni par les algorithmes de classement et de visibilité propres aux plateformes numériques — moteurs de recherche, réseaux sociaux, marketplaces — où le critère régulateur n’est plus le droit, ni même une morale sociale explicitement formulée, mais une fonction de ranking : pertinence calculée, taux de clic, engagement moyen, compatibilité avec les CGU. La scène de la délibération ne disparaît pas parce qu’elle serait réfutée ; elle est contournée et remplacée par l’ajustement silencieux de paramètres inaccessibles. - -Cette transformation relève d’une dépolitisation par intégration fonctionnelle. Les conflits sont absorbés, neutralisés, reprogrammés sous la forme de problèmes d’architecture, de mise à l’échelle, de sécurité ou d’optimisation de la bande passante. Ce qui relevait d’une tension entre valeurs devient affaire de performance technique. L’archicration, ici, ne s’exerce plus prioritairement comme pouvoir instituant visible, mais comme tendance à la stabilisation automatique, infra-politisée, agissant sans apparaître, décidant sans se nommer, régulant sans s’exposer à l’interrogation publique. - -On a pu décrire ce phénomène sous les noms de technopouvoir ou de technogouvernance ; mais ces termes demeurent trop vagues s’ils ne saisissent pas le phénomène précis que nous visons ici : la décomposition des médiations symboliques — lois, institutions, débats, représentants — au profit d’un encodage des rapports sociaux dans des objets techniques, eux-mêmes produits par des acteurs non élus, situés hors du champ classique de la souveraineté. Comme l’a montré Benjamin Bratton dans *The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty* (2016), la souveraineté n’est plus principalement verticale : elle devient stratifiée, exercée à travers des couches logicielles, des plateformes, des standards et des systèmes d’exploitation qui opèrent largement à distance des frontières territoriales comme des décisions collectives explicites. - -Le rôle des plateformes globales — GAFA, BATX, acteurs de la fintech, infrastructures de cloud, opérateurs de téléphonie transcontinentale — est ici décisif. Elles produisent l’environnement même dans lequel les autres acteurs opèrent, sans être elles-mêmes soumises aux mécanismes classiques de responsabilité. Leur pouvoir agit en amont des catégories classiques du politique : elles définissent ce qu’il est possible de faire, de dire, de voir et d’échanger, non pas d’abord par interdiction, mais par design. C’est ce que Shoshana Zuboff a décrit comme une forme de *surveillance capitalism* dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), mais qu’il faut ici reformuler plus rigoureusement : non pas seulement un capitalisme qui surveille, mais une régulation qui s’invisibilise dans les architectures matérielles de la vie connectée. - -Ce qu’il y a de plus grave, dans cette configuration, n’est pas seulement l’existence d’un pouvoir non élu, mais la difficulté croissante à le désigner comme pouvoir. Il s’efface derrière la solution technique, le choix d’architecture, l’argument d’efficacité ou le récit de l’innovation. Il ne s’assume plus : il se dissout dans les procédures. Et cette dissolution rend la critique plus difficile, non parce qu’elle abolirait la domination, mais parce qu’elle en disperse les lieux, en obscurcit les ressorts et en complique l’assignation. - -La radicalisation contemporaine de l’arcalité invisible ne saurait être comprise sans une analyse précise de ses dispositifs concrets, inscrits dans des architectures matérielles, des réseaux de traitement et des régimes juridiques hybrides. Ces infrastructures, souvent soustraites à la perception ordinaire, portent la matrice opératoire d’une archicration sans visage, où les acteurs du pouvoir ne se réduisent plus aux États ou aux institutions, mais incluent plateformes, câblo-opérateurs, data centers et consortiums transnationaux. - -Le cas de la surveillance distribuée, révélé notamment à partir de 2013 par Edward Snowden, en fournit une illustration nette. Les programmes PRISM, XKeyscore, Tempora ou Upstream reposent non sur des interceptions ciblées, mais sur la captation systématique de métadonnées en transit sur les infrastructures globales, en coopération étroite entre agences étatiques — telles que la NSA ou le GCHQ — et grandes entreprises numériques. Il ne s’agit plus d’intercepter des intentions, mais de cartographier des comportements. Cette architecture produit un pouvoir panoptique sans centre, automatisé, distribué, permanent, dans lequel la distinction entre sécurité et exploitation commerciale devient difficilement discernable. - -Un second exemple réside dans les data centers, que l’on peut qualifier de territoires algorithmico-énergétiques. Des sites tels que ceux de Google à The Dalles, des infrastructures suédoises d’EcoDataCenter, ou des complexes de Tencent et Alibaba en Chine concentrent aujourd’hui la mémoire active du monde social numérisé. Leur sécurité, leur capacité de traitement et leur intégration dans des réseaux propriétaires en font des nœuds décisifs de la gouvernance algorithmique. Leur souveraineté n’est pas juridique mais opératoire : ils déterminent les conditions effectives d’accès, de hiérarchisation et de circulation de l’information. Le pouvoir ne s’y exprime plus par autorisation, mais par configuration. - -Enfin, l’expansion des grandes plateformes globales — Amazon, Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Tencent, Alibaba — manifeste ce que Saskia Sassen a décrit comme une dénationalisation partielle de l’autorité. Ces acteurs n’agissent plus seulement comme entreprises : ils définissent des normes, régulent des échanges, arbitrent des litiges, et structurent les conditions mêmes de l’action sociale. Leur pouvoir ne repose pas d’abord sur l’interdiction, mais sur la définition des possibles : visibilité, accès, interaction, reconnaissance. - -Le point critique tient alors à leur mode de légitimation : ces dispositifs sont moins validés par le droit que par l’usage. L’agrégation des comportements — clics, engagements, interactions — produit un horizon normatif itératif, où la règle émerge du flux plutôt qu’elle ne le précède. La souveraineté devient émulative, la norme procédurale, et le politique tend à se dissoudre dans la dynamique des pratiques. - -C’est à ce niveau que la démonstration bascule : le pouvoir contemporain ne réside plus prioritairement dans les institutions, mais dans les infrastructures. Il ne se légitime plus principalement par la loi, mais par l’usage ; il ne se confronte plus frontalement au collectif, mais s’inscrit dans ses pratiques. Il devient ainsi régulation sans scène, autorité sans figure, domination sans voix. - -Ce que révèle, en sa profondeur critique, l’arcalité invisible contemporaine, ce n’est pas seulement une mutation technique ou une inflexion logistique de la régulation, mais une reconfiguration radicale du rapport au réel, au pouvoir et à la scène elle-même. Là où les formes classiques d’arcalité — disciplinaires, infrastructurelles ou cybernétiques — reposaient encore sur des dispositifs relativement visibles, situés, incarnés dans des territoires, des institutions et des normes repérables, la forme née de la quatrième révolution industrielle efface progressivement ses propres conditions d’existence. Elle ne s’exhibe plus : elle s’infiltre. Elle ne régule plus frontalement : elle préconfigure. Elle ne spatialise plus l’ordre : elle en redéfinit silencieusement les protocoles. - -La force de cette arcalité tient précisément à son invisibilité. Parce qu’elle se retire hors scène, hors langage et hors controverse, elle exerce un pouvoir d’autant plus décisif. Le réel n’est plus structuré d’abord par des mots d’ordre, des lois ou des injonctions, mais par l’architecture technique, la couche protocolaire et la configuration par défaut. Comme le souligne Benjamin Bratton dans *The Stack* (2016), émerge ainsi un pouvoir architectural, dans lequel les conditions matérielles et logicielles de l’existence produisent une régulation automatique fondée sur les formes d’accès, les permissions d’interface et les modalités d’interopérabilité. C’est dans la grammaire du code, dans la topologie des câbles et dans la géopolitique des data centers que s’écrit désormais une part décisive de la condition d’existence du monde humain connecté. - -Mais cette invisibilité n’est pas uniquement un effacement esthétique ; elle a une portée proprement politique. Ce qui disparaît ici, au-delà de la visibilité du pouvoir, c’est la possibilité même de sa mise en question. Il n’y a plus de scène pour contester, plus de centre à désigner, plus de texte à interpréter. Il n’y a plus que des flux à optimiser, des interfaces à améliorer, des algorithmes à ajuster. Le pouvoir devient effet d’efficacité. L’archicration ne se proclame plus : elle se déploie sans dire son nom, à travers des scripts, des normes techniques, des API et des conditions d’usage. C’est une régulation à régulateur effacé, un pilotage à pilote absent, une autorité à sujet dissous. - -Et c’est précisément là que réside le cœur de notre thèse : l’archicration contemporaine, dans sa forme arcalitaire la plus avancée, n’a pas disparu ; elle s’est oblitérée. Elle ne s’est pas effondrée : elle s’est retirée de la scène pour mieux s’incarner dans l’environnement même. Cette arcalité invisible constitue l’une des formes les plus puissantes et les plus insidieuses de la régulation contemporaine. Elle n’impose plus d’abord des formes : elle produit l’habitude de leur évidence. Elle ne cherche plus prioritairement à convaincre : elle organise les conditions de possibilité du pensable. Elle ne sanctionne pas seulement : elle configure les possibles. - -Ainsi se clôt la section 4.5.1. Mais loin de clore une époque, elle ouvre une problématique décisive : que devient l’expérience humaine dans un monde régulé sans visage, sans épreuve et sans friction apparente ? La réponse — ou du moins les lignes de faille de cette régulation invisible — commence à s’esquisser dans la montée d’un nouveau régime de puissance, plus préhensif, plus intime et plus prédictif : la cratialité anticipatoire. C’est à cette inflexion que nous consacrons maintenant la section 4.5.2. - -### **4.5.2 – *Cratialité anticipatoire* : captation attentionnelle, algorithmes de prédiction, IA comportementale** - -L’un des basculements les plus décisifs dans l’histoire contemporaine de la régulation sociale ne s’est pas produit dans le fracas des armes ou la mobilisation visible des masses, mais dans le glissement progressif, quasi imperceptible, d’un pouvoir agissant par la force à un pouvoir opérant par captation. Ce passage, que nous désignons ici comme l’émergence d’une cratialité anticipatoire, ne renvoie pas à une simple inflexion technique ni à une amélioration instrumentale de la gouvernance, mais à une reconfiguration profonde des modalités mêmes de la puissance : l’anticipation devient l’acte régulateur par excellence. La force, qui jadis s’imposait frontalement se déploie désormais sous la forme d’un pouvoir prédictif, d’une intelligence comportementale distribuée, d’un dispositif d’extraction attentionnelle continu. - -Ce nouveau régime cratial émerge sur le terreau de trois dynamiques convergentes, qu’il nous faut articuler méthodiquement : d’abord, la captation des signaux faibles, c’est-à-dire la capacité à identifier, parmi les flux d’actions, de clics, de mouvements et de gestes, des indices infimes de comportements potentiels ; ensuite, la modélisation prédictive, qui transforme ces signaux en patterns exploitables à des fins de guidage, d’orientation ou de redirection des conduites ; enfin, l’automatisation du retour, par laquelle la boucle entre observation, calcul et modification se referme sans intervention humaine. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de surveiller, ni même de gouverner : il s’agit d’*influencer avant l’acte*, *d’orienter avant la conscience*, *de configurer avant la décision*. - -Cette mutation constitue un tournant paradigmatique dans l’histoire archicratique de la régulation moderne : la puissance ne se conçoit plus seulement comme tension entre autorité formelle et comportements des sujets, mais comme pré-configuration anticipatrice des conduites. La règle précédait l’action. La norme encadrait le possible. Mais avec l’avènement des techniques dites d’*IA comportementale*, notamment à partir de l’essor massif de l’apprentissage automatique (*machine learning*) dans les années 2010, le rapport s’inverse : l’action est préemptée par le calcul, le comportement devient la matière première du pouvoir, et la prédiction remplace la prescription. Il ne s’agit plus de dire ce qui est permis ou interdit : il s’agit d’ajuster, en temps réel, ce qui est probable ou improbable, désirable ou indésirable, rentable ou inefficace. - -Cette *cratialité anticipatrice* opère ainsi un enchaînement sans épreuve : elle n’exige ni force physique, ni dispositif répressif, ni même visibilité du pouvoir. Elle repose sur une captation diffuse de l’attention et une reconstruction permanente des trajectoires probables. Comme le souligne Shoshana Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), nous assistons à l’invention d’un "exil de l’action" : le sujet agit de plus en plus dans une gamme d’actions déjà identifiées comme prédictibles, mais depuis la gamme restreinte des actions déjà identifiées comme prédictibles, monétisables et exploitables. - -C’est en ce sens que la *cratialité anticipatrice* ne peut être réduite à une modalité douce ou subtile du contrôle. Elle est au contraire l’une des formes les plus avancées, les plus préhensiles et les plus imperceptibles de la domination. Là où la force disciplinait le corps, la prédiction capture le futur. Là où le pouvoir imposait un ordre, il configure dorénavant les marges de l’imprévisible. L’anticipation devient non plus une stratégie, mais une structure — un opérateur ontologique de la régulation contemporaine. Il nous faut à présent en décortiquer les mécanismes, les opérateurs, les matérialisations concrètes. - -La *captation attentionnelle* n’est pas un phénomène annexe ou marginal dans l’économie contemporaine des puissances : elle en constitue le socle infrastructurel et le point d’entrée cratial. En d’autres termes, il n’est pas exagéré d’affirmer qu’à partir des années 2010, avec l’essor exponentiel des interfaces numériques, des objets connectés et des plateformes globalisées (Google, Facebook, TikTok, Amazon, etc.), la valeur régulatrice du sujet s’est trouvée fondamentalement reconfigurée. Ce n’est plus la force de travail ni même la capacité de consommation qui définit l’être social, mais son attention disponible, son exposition comportementale, sa mobilité prédictive dans l’espace des corrélations statistiques. La *cratialité* se déploie alors selon une *logique de captation comportementale*, au sens de B.J. Fogg — c’est-à-dire comme science de la capture des comportements via le design interactif, l’ajustement micro-intentionnel et la modulation algorithmique des sollicitations. - -La plateforme numérique agit alors comme une scène archicratique oblitérée mais d’une efficacité considérable, dans laquelle chaque clic, chaque défilement, chaque pause visuelle devient un événement significatif pour la modélisation. La subjectivité est ici réduite à une succession d’actes faibles, d’autant plus gouvernables qu’ils semblent anodins. Cette réduction, qui transforme la personne en profil, le geste en probabilité et la temporalité vécue en signal exploitable, constitue l’une des matrices opératoires de la cratialité anticipatrice. La force n’est plus mobilisée contre l’individu : elle s’enclenche depuis ses propres micro-données. - -Il faut ici convoquer les travaux de Rouvroy et Berns (2013), mais aussi ceux de Zuboff (2019) ou d’Yves Citton (*Pour une écologie de l’attention*, 2014), pour comprendre que ce qui est en jeu dans ce régime attentionnel n’est pas seulement la marchandisation de la concentration, mais l’organisation d’un pouvoir régulateur fondé sur la visibilité préemptive de l’individu. Ce n’est plus l’institution qui observe le sujet : c’est le système qui absorbe sa présence même pour recalculer en permanence la meilleure manière de faire persévérer ses trajectoires. - -Ainsi se met en place un régime de l’anticipation comportementale, dans lequel la donnée n’est jamais un reflet, mais toujours un levier. L’algorithme ne cherche pas à comprendre, mais à orienter. La modélisation n’est pas interprétative, elle est *instrumentale*. Le sujet n’est plus le point d’origine d’un vouloir : il devient le nœud d’un faisceau de corrélations comportementales qui configurent son avenir sans son consentement, parfois même sans sa conscience. - -Ce régime est à la fois d’une puissance remarquable — puisqu’il gouverne sans apparaître — et d’une fragilité réelle — puisque toute sa cohérence dépend de la stabilité des modèles, de la permanence des signaux, et de la clôture des systèmes de calcul. Nous le verrons plus loin, c’est précisément cette tension qui rend la cratialité anticipatoire à la fois redoutablement efficace et potentiellement vulnérable à ses propres excès. - -Ce que le passage de la simple automatisation à l’intelligence artificielle comportementale institue, ce n’est pas uniquement un changement d’échelle dans le traitement des données, mais bien une mutation profonde dans la *nature* même de l’opération régulatoire. L’IA n’est pas un outil de plus dans la panoplie technique des dispositifs de contrôle : elle est, dans sa version comportementale, un actant régulateur autonome, capable non seulement de lire les signaux, mais de produire les conditions mêmes de leur apparition, de leur modulation et de leur incorporation dans des boucles d’ajustement systémique. Autrement dit, l’IA devient *un opérateur régulateur sans intériorité*, un agent de gouvernance sans intention ni discours, un dispositif purement fonctionnel, mais redoutablement efficace dans sa capacité à engendrer des comportements régulés. - -Cette transformation est d’autant plus radicale qu’elle ne repose pas sur un schéma classique de pouvoir émetteur-récepteur, mais sur une génération en boucle fermée de stimuli, de réponses et de renormalisations. L’IA comportementale — qu’elle soit déployée dans les modèles de recommandation, les assistants virtuels, les outils d’évaluation automatisée ou les systèmes de crédit social — fonctionne comme un moteur d’adaptation prédictive : elle ajuste les comportements à une norme non exprimée, mais calculée, en amont même de leur déploiement. - -C’est là le cœur du basculement archicratique : Le pouvoir cesse d’être d’abord prescriptif (tu dois faire) ; il agit désormais en amont de l’action elle-même (tu feras ce qui est prédit). Cette logique est celle que décrivent admirablement O'Neil (2016) dans *Weapons of Math Destruction* et Shoshana Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019) : la norme n’est plus une injonction morale, juridique ou politique, elle est une dérivation statistique intégrée dans des réseaux de corrélations suffisamment vastes pour rendre caduque toute singularité. La liberté elle-même est absorbée comme variable d’ajustement, comme résidu probabilisable. - -Cette condition nouvelle du sujet — non plus seulement gouverné, mais intégré dans un moteur de prédiction — redéfinit en profondeur les cadres classiques de l’analyse politique, sociologique et éthique. L’IA comportementale ne vise pas le bien, le juste, le vrai, le légitime ; elle vise l’optimisation, l’efficacité, la continuité fluide d’un flux de comportements modélisés. La tension fondamentale entre liberté et régulation, qui fondait les théories modernes de la démocratie, de l’éthique ou du droit, est ici court-circuitée par une rationalité cybernétique pure : celle du minimum de friction, du maximum d’adhérence au modèle. - -Dans ce contexte, il est absolument essentiel de comprendre que la régulation prédictive opérée par les IA comportementales produit un effondrement de la scène politique : il n’y a plus de débat, plus de négociation, plus de désaccord visible. Une part croissante des conduites est absorbée dans la prévision et rendue compatible avec la trajectoire la plus probable. La conflictualité n’est plus niée : elle est désamorcée en amont. Le dissensus tend à être absorbé dans le signal. - -Et c’est cette dissimulation de l’épreuve régulatoire, cette invisibilisation du moment archicratique, qui constitue le véritable enjeu critique de la cratialité anticipatoire contemporaine. Car si le pouvoir s’exerce désormais sans sujet, sans adresse et sans autorité visible, il devient d’autant plus difficile à contester, à dénoncer ou à renverser. L’instance à contester n’est plus le tyran, le maître ou le censeur ; elle tend à se déplacer vers l’algorithme, la plateforme et le protocole. Un pouvoir difficile à localiser, à nommer et à incarner. - -Pour en saisir les formes concrètes, il faut examiner les principaux lieux de déploiement des régulations prédictives automatisées. Les cas paradigmatiques de la publicité comportementale, des systèmes de notation sociale et des algorithmes de scoring révèlent à la fois la puissance, l’ubiquité et l’opacité des dispositifs par lesquels l’anticipation algorithmique modèle les comportements humains, transforme les subjectivités, et redessine les hiérarchies sociales sans recours au débat public. - -Prenons tout d’abord l’exemple des *publicités prédictives* pilotées par les géants du capitalisme de plateforme. Google, Facebook, Amazon, TikTok ou encore X (ex-Twitter) ne se contentent pas de proposer des produits ou des contenus : ils organisent une architecture attentionnelle dans laquelle l’offre précède le désir, où la suggestion anticipe le besoin, et où la pertinence algorithmique remplace l’intention réflexive. Le cœur de cette économie est ce que Zuboff nomme la *capture de surplus comportemental* — c’est-à-dire l’extraction de micro-données (clics, pauses, scrolls, vues incomplètes, timing de réaction) qui permettent de construire un modèle dynamique de l’utilisateur, non pas dans son identité mais dans sa propension. Le ciblage publicitaire ne répond plus à une demande : il la préfigure. Il fonctionne comme un dispositif d’orientation des trajectoires attentionnelles, dans une logique d’adhérence probabilisée. On ne vend plus des biens : on vend des probabilités de conversion. Ce pouvoir algorithmique préfiguratif instaure une scène de régulation où le possible tend à être normé avant d’être choisi. - -Un second domaine particulièrement révélateur est celui des *systèmes de notation comportementale* qui, dans plusieurs contextes étatiques ou corporatifs, visent à intégrer la régulation sociale dans un modèle d’incitation algorithmique. Le cas du système de crédit social chinois reste le plus emblématique, même si sa complexité est souvent caricaturée en Occident. Il ne s’agit pas d’un système unique et centralisé, mais d’une constellation de programmes pilotes, locaux, sectoriels, articulés à la fois sur des données administratives (impôts, casiers judiciaires, comportements civiques) et sur des indicateurs plus subjectifs (évaluations de pairs, réputation en ligne, conformité aux règles de copropriété, etc.). Le tout est indexé à des sanctions et des privilèges : limitation de déplacements, accès différencié au crédit, à l’emploi ou à l’éducation. Ce modèle réalise une véritable *archicration anticipative* : il ne punit pas rétroactivement, il pré-structure les comportements par un maillage d’incitations systémiques, dans une logique d’ajustement social global. Le pouvoir ne dit plus « tu n’as pas le droit » ; il inscrit l’illégitimité dans le *score*, dans l’indice, dans la réputation calculée. - -Enfin, un troisième champ d’analyse critique se situe dans les *systèmes de scoring algorithmique appliqués à l’emploi, à l’assurance, à l’accès au logement, ou encore à la justice prédictive*. Ces systèmes, souvent sous-traités à des prestataires privés, fonctionnent comme des boîtes noires décisionnelles, fondées sur des jeux de données historiques biaisées, sur des corrélations implicites non vérifiées, et sur des seuils de décision totalement opaques. Les logiciels de tri de CV utilisés dans le recrutement automatisé (ex : HireVue, Pymetrics), les systèmes de scoring de solvabilité (ex : FICO aux États-Unis), ou encore les algorithmes prédictifs de récidive utilisés par la justice pénale américaine (ex : COMPAS) constituent des régimes de cratialité sans visage : personne ne décide, mais tout est décidé. Le discriminatoire n’est plus assumé, il est intégré dans un code. Le contrôle ne s’exerce plus par l’injonction ou l’exclusion explicite : il s’effectue par *l’écrémage algorithmique*, par la modulation silencieuse des trajectoires sociales à travers des variables statistiques. - -Ce qui est à l’œuvre dans tous ces dispositifs, c’est un renversement profond de l’économie politique du pouvoir : le sujet n’est plus soumis au droit, il est ajusté au calcul. L’anticipation algorithmique produit une nouvelle forme d’archicration, non plus centralisée, visible et contestable, mais fragmentée, fluide, insaisissable — oblitérée dans les profondeurs techniques des systèmes d’information. Et c’est précisément cette oblitération du moment régulateur qui constitue le défi majeur pour la pensée critique contemporaine : comment repolitiser ce qui a été délibérément rendu a-politique par le design technique ? Comment rendre à nouveau visible, discutable, négociable une régulation sans scène, sans logos, sans conflictualité apparente ? - -Ce que révèle l’analyse de la cratialité anticipatoire, dans toute son épaisseur technopolitique et son ambivalence normative, c’est la mue profonde d’un régime de pouvoir qui ne s’exerce plus par l’acte visible d’autorité ni par l’affrontement conflictuel sur une scène instituée, mais par une modulation probabiliste des trajectoires humaines à travers des architectures techniques de captation, de calcul et de prescription. Il ne s’agit plus d’imposer, ni même d’interdire : il s’agit de prévoir, d’orienter, de préfigurer, de rendre probable certains comportements plutôt que d’autres, par le biais de dispositifs intelligents dont l’efficacité est directement proportionnelle à leur invisibilité. Le pouvoir devient moins coercitif que directionnel : il agit par gradients d’influence plutôt que par sommations explicites. C’est là le cœur du basculement cratial qui caractérise la quatrième révolution industrielle. - -Cette mutation n’est pas un simple prolongement de la rationalisation opérée dans les régimes précédents. Elle constitue un saut qualitatif, une transformation de la nature même de l’acte de régulation. La *cratialité anticipatoire* n’est ni disciplinaire ni décisionnelle ; elle est *algorithmique*, *opératoire*, *préemptive*. Elle ne se construit plus dans le cadre d’une dialectique entre sujet et norme, mais dans une relation *sans énonciation*, où le pouvoir agit en silence, par interpolation de patterns, par extraction de régularités comportementales, par inscription dans des chaînes de corrélation. Il ne s’agit pas de dire la norme, mais de l’exécuter sous la forme d’un code. Ainsi, comme le montre brillamment Louise Amoore dans *Cloud Ethics* (2020), l’anticipation algorithmique « ne se contente pas de prédire ce que nous pourrions faire : elle reconfigure ce que nous sommes censés pouvoir faire ». La prédiction devient prescription. L’ontologie du possible est reprogrammée. - -Dans ce contexte, l’individu n’est plus seulement sujet d’un droit, ni même objet d’un dispositif — il est *flux de données à moduler*, *profil à prédire*, *signal à ajuster*. La *cratialité anticipatoire* est donc un régime de pouvoir profondément post-discursif : elle n’appelle ni adhésion, ni conflit, ni transgression. Elle opère par *discrétisation* du réel, par *dislocation* du sujet, par *dissolution* du politique. Elle met en œuvre ce que Rouvroy et Berns appellent une *gouvernementalité algorithmique sans sujet* : une forme de gouvernement qui, au lieu de passer par des représentations, des lois, des discours, agit directement sur les conditions d’apparition des comportements, via des dispositifs techniques auto-apprenants, connectés, rétroactifs. La logique du feedback remplace la logique du contrat ; la logique de la probabilité évince celle de la responsabilité. - -Mais cette régulation par anticipation, aussi sophistiquée soit-elle, n’est pas sans contrepartie. Car à mesure qu’elle gagne en efficacité prédictive, elle se heurte à sa propre limite structurelle : le vivant, le social, le conflictuel ne se laissent pas totalement anticiper. Il demeure toujours un résidu, un écart, une fuite — ce que nous pourrions appeler, en écho à Georges Canguilhem, une normativité rebelle, une part de subjectivité irréductible qui résiste à l’assignation algorithmique. Cette résistance ne prend pas nécessairement la forme d’un affrontement frontal ; elle peut se déployer comme bruit, comme chaos, comme imprévisibilité radicale. C’est précisément ce que les régimes prédictifs tentent de neutraliser — mais qu’ils échouent à éradiquer complètement, car le réel est irréductible à ses modèles. - -Enfin, cette forme de cratialité marque également une étape critique dans notre conceptualisation générale de l’*archicration*. Car elle montre que l’archicration peut s’effacer tout en conservant sa puissance : elle devient une régulation *sans scène*, un pouvoir *sans garant*, une organisation du monde *sans énoncé fondateur*. Ce n’est plus le roi qui parle, ni le législateur qui tranche, ni même l’ingénieur qui planifie : c’est la machine qui calibre, l’algorithme qui oriente, l’interface qui sélectionne. La scène archicratique se trouve ainsi oblitérée, dispersée dans un ensemble de calculs sans visage. L’épreuve du commun, qui faisait encore de la régulation un enjeu politique, devient imperceptible. C’est cette disparition de la scène régulatoire qui ouvre la voie à notre prochaine section : celle d’un régime oblitéré, pouvoir sans lieu clairement assignable, sans sujet identifiable et sans contradiction apparente, mais aux effets d’autant plus profonds. - -### 4.5.3 — *Archicration oblitérée* : régulation sans scène, automatisation des normes, effacement du conflit, dissimulation de l’épreuve et des preuves - -Ce qui s’accomplit dans les régimes contemporains de pouvoir — à l’intersection de l’infrastructure numérique planétaire, de la prédiction algorithmique, et de la captation attentionnelle — relève d’une inflexion historique capitale de l’archicration. Non plus son déploiement visible et instituant, comme dans ses formes classiques ou cybernétiques, mais son oblitération : son effacement comme scène identifiable de régulation et sa dissémination dans les flux techniques et les automatismes socio-algorithmiques. Ce n’est plus seulement que la régulation se fait sans visage : c’est qu’elle se fait *hors scène*, *hors sujet*, *hors preuve* — dans un régime quasi spectral du pouvoir, où la norme opère sans être nommée, où le conflit est absorbé avant même d’apparaître, et où l’épreuve régulatoire, en tant que moment de visibilité, d’opposition, voire de scandale, est structurellement neutralisée. - -L’enjeu est ici fondamental pour notre essai-thèse sur l’archicratie : nous assistons à une mutation dans la *possibilité même d’un régime archicratique identifiable*. Là où les régulations antérieures, même dans leurs formes les plus totalisantes ou disciplinantes, laissaient subsister une scène — un lieu, une instance, un conflit, une juridiction, une modalité de l’interpellation — la configuration contemporaine produit un monde dans lequel la régulation devient *désincarnée, difficile à référer et de moins en moins rapportable à une scène identifiable*. Elle ne convoque plus le sujet — ni pour l’assujettir, ni même pour le responsabiliser — mais l’évalue, le profile, le module, le trie, sans jamais se rendre visible à lui. Elle ne fonde plus ses interventions sur un *ordre juridique*, une *norme énoncée* ou une *valeur explicite*, mais sur un *fonctionnement optimisé*, sur des *corrélations statistiques* et sur des *systèmes d’alerte automatisés*. Ainsi se dessine une archicration oblitérée, c’est-à-dire une régulation qui ne se donne plus comme telle : elle opère sans se dire, sans s’assumer pleinement, sans apparaître. - -Ce basculement n’est pas une simple inflexion technique ; il engage un tournant épistémologique, un effondrement de la réflexivité régulatoire et, en dernière instance, une dissolution du politique en tant que scène du commun régulé. L’effacement du conflit n’est pas l’avènement de la paix, mais la mise hors-jeu du dissensus. La disparition de la preuve n’est pas la fin de l’enquête, mais l’impossibilité de l’objectivation. Et l’automatisation des normes n’est pas leur perfection, mais leur soustraction à toute forme de responsabilité instituante. - -Dans cette section, nous analyserons donc rigoureusement, à la lumière de notre cadre théorique triptyque (arcalité, cratialité, archicration), les mécanismes à travers lesquels la régulation contemporaine *efface sa propre scène*. Nous montrerons comment les infrastructures de traitement automatisé, la logique de l’efficience prédictive, et la dépolitisation active des normes conduisent à un régime où la puissance ne s’assume plus comme telle, mais s’implante dans les conditions mêmes du réel. Nous explorerons notamment l’effacement de l’épreuve (au sens où plus rien n’est publiquement mis en question), et la dissimulation des preuves (au sens où les décisions régulatoires ne laissent plus de trace falsifiable, ni de justification intelligible). C’est ce que nous nommerons ici l’oblitération archicratique : non pas la fin de la régulation, mais la fin de sa visibilité, de son opposabilité, et de sa responsabilité. - -Ce qui caractérise le régime de régulation propre à la phase contemporaine de l’archicratie — ici qualifiée d’*oblitérée* — c’est une double disjonction : d’une part, la dissociation entre norme et visibilité, et d’autre part, la disparition du dissensus comme scène critique de l’expérience collective. Autrement dit, nous entrons dans une phase où *la régulation opère sans apparaître*, où *le pouvoir agit sans s’exhiber*, et où *la contrainte se réalise sans mise à l’épreuve*. Il ne s’agit plus ici d’un pouvoir qui impose, qui discipline, ou même qui séduit : il s’agit d’un pouvoir qui n’apparaît plus comme tel, d’un gouvernement dissous dans la gouvernance, d’un ordre dont l’autorité se rend de moins en moins assignable. Ce paradoxe est au cœur de l’hypothèse archicratique : ce n’est pas la régulation qui a disparu, mais bien *la scène régulatoire* elle-même, c’est-à-dire ce lieu symbolique, matériel, politique, dans lequel le pouvoir assume sa fonction, l’expose, la justifie, et s’ouvre à la contestation. - -Dans les régimes régulateurs classiques, même dans les formes les plus brutales — disciplinaires, policières, militaires, totalitaires — l’existence d’un *lieu du pouvoir*, d’un *centre de décision*, d’un *discours normatif*, demeurait repérable, contestable, opposable. L’école avait son maître, la loi son tribunal, l’usine son contremaître, l’armée son commandement, l’État son administration. Même l’autorité la plus illégitime demeurait localisable. Mais dans les régimes contemporains d’archicration oblitérée, la régulation passe par *des chaînes d’automates décisionnels*, *des logiques d’optimisation invisibilisées*, *des architectures techniques à la fois opaques et fluides*, *si bien que le pouvoir tend à devenir ambiant*. Il ne tranche plus, il *paramètre*. Il ne juge plus, il *score*. Et surtout : l’efficience du fonctionnement tient lieu de justification. - -Cette oblitération de la scène régulatoire se traduit, sur le plan politique, par une atonie du dissensus. Non pas parce que les inégalités ou les violences structurelles auraient disparu — au contraire, elles prolifèrent — mais parce qu’elles sont *décontextualisées*, *dé-indexées*, *dépoliticisées*. Le travailleur ubérisé, l’étudiant noté par algorithme, le migrant fiché par IA, le citoyen géolocalisé et profilé n’ont plus d’instance vers laquelle faire remonter leur plainte. Ils ne sont plus *interpellés* au sens politique du terme, comme sujet pouvant répondre. Ils sont *captés* comme source de signal. Leur subjectivité est dissoute dans un flux de données. Et le dissensus n’a plus de lieu, car il n’a plus d’objet identifiable : qui protester contre un coefficient opaque ? qui mettre en accusation quand le processus est réparti entre des dizaines de couches techniques, de micro-décisions automatisées, d’algorithmes propriétaires ? - -La conséquence en est radicale : le conflit ne disparaît pas, il est neutralisé en amont, intégré aux procédures et requalifié comme bruit dans la matrice. L’épreuve n’a plus lieu. La règle ne se négocie plus. La norme n’est plus énoncée, elle est codée. Il y a là une mutation profonde dans le régime même de l’archicration : on ne régule plus en dialoguant avec les sujets, mais en les contournant, en les prédéfinissant, en réduisant leur capacité d’intervention dans l’épreuve régulatoire. Il ne s’agit même plus de les faire taire, mais de ne plus leur adresser la parole. Le dissensus est disqualifié non comme erreur, mais comme *perturbation logique*. Et la régulation devient *lissage*, *filtrage*, *optimisation*, au mépris de toute conflictualité fondatrice. - -C’est ici que l’on comprend que l’archicration oblitérée constitue une phase critique dans l’histoire des formes régulatoires : non pas parce qu’elle serait particulièrement autoritaire ou brutale (même si elle peut l’être), mais parce qu’elle dissout *la condition même de la régulation*, à savoir la scène. Il n’y a plus de scène, parce qu’il n’y a plus de reconnaissance mutuelle entre les termes du pouvoir. Il n’y a plus de mise en forme du commun, mais seulement une logique de traitement. Il n’y a plus de société régulée — il y a une série de données modélisées et simulées. - -Dans le régime d’archicration oblitérée, la norme ne disparaît pas — elle s’efface. Plus précisément, elle cesse d’être formulée en tant que *norme* pour devenir *procédure*, *fonction*, *critère implicite*, *protocole incrémental*. Ce que nous avions encore la possibilité de désigner dans les précédents régimes — règle, loi, décret, contrat, protocole de négociation — devient ici pure performance d’un système, dont la normativité est dissoute dans l’itération technique. La norme n’est plus énoncée ; elle est implémentée. C’est ce qui la rend plus difficile à contester : ce que l’on ne peut ni nommer clairement ni situer ne s’assigne plus aisément à responsabilité. Ce qui ne se présente plus comme norme, mais comme automatisme fonctionnel, cesse d’être perçu comme relevant du politique — alors même qu’il en est aujourd’hui le cœur. - -Ce phénomène se radicalise dans les architectures régulatoires dites « intelligentes », où les modalités de traitement des situations ne sont plus décidées en amont, mais calculées en temps réel à partir d’un passé de données. L’intelligence artificielle, en particulier dans ses formes apprenantes (machine learning, deep learning), produit une régulation sans règle préalable, sans cadre de délibération, sans justification. Elle ne décide pas à partir de principes, mais d’historicités statistiques. Elle ne juge pas : elle *prévoit*, *compare*, *classe*, *ajuste*. C’est l’aboutissement d’un processus que Michel Callon avait déjà entrevu dans ses travaux sur l'économie des agencements (Callon, *L’emprise des marchés*, 2007) : les décisions ne sont plus prises *par* des sujets, mais *dans* des dispositifs, par circulation, agencement, rétroaction de signaux. Et ce que ces dispositifs oblitèrent n’est pas seulement le débat politique, mais *la condition même de la vérification* : la *preuve*. - -L’un des signes les plus inquiétants de cette mutation tient précisément à cette disparition de la preuve comme opérateur de vérité et de droit. Dans les régimes précédents, toute décision, même injuste, devait en principe être *justifiable* : c’est-à-dire exposée, motivée, opposable. Le droit, même dans ses formes les plus inégalitaires, organisait une scène d’argumentation, une possibilité de recours, une exigence de démonstration. Dans les régimes algorithmisés contemporains, cette scène est effacée. Le score qui attribue un crédit, qui sélectionne un profil, qui déclenche une alerte, qui attribue une note de confiance, n’est plus *expliqué* : il est *exécuté*. Et cette exécution sans justification installe un pouvoir sans preuve — c’est-à-dire, pour reprendre la formule de Jacques Rancière dans *La haine de la démocratie* (2005), un pouvoir sans compte à rendre, sans logos, sans dissensus possible. - -Dans l’univers des plateformes, cette disparition de la preuve est institutionnalisée. Les sanctions algorithmiques (désactivation d’un compte, déréférencement, bannissement, assignation de statut, shadowban) sont mises en œuvre sans notification, sans procédure contradictoire, sans possibilité d’appel. Le pouvoir devient l’effet silencieux d’un code inaccessible. Comme l’a montré Frank Pasquale dans *The Black Box Society* (2015), cette logique de la boîte noire institutionnalise l’asymétrie radicale entre les producteurs de normes et les sujets régulés : seuls les premiers ont accès aux critères ; les seconds en subissent les effets sans en connaître les causes. La régulation se fait sans scène, sans exposé, sans responsabilité explicite. Elle se contente de *fonctionner*. - -Or cet effacement de la preuve — de la possibilité même de produire une démonstration, une explication, une contradiction — est peut-être le symptôme le plus radical de l’archicration oblitérée : elle signe la fin de l’épreuve comme modalité centrale de la régulation. Le conflit n’est pas réprimé : il est *inexprimable*. La règle n’est pas autoritaire : elle est *inexpliquée*. Le pouvoir n’est pas visible : il est *calculé*. Il n’y a plus de théâtre du droit, plus de scène du politique, plus de tension entre normativité et subjectivation. Tend alors à ne subsister qu’un ajustement en continu du système à ses propres critères internes. Et cette régulation opaque, dépourvue de justification publique, tend vers une régulation sans extériorité lisible, c’est-à-dire une forme de pouvoir sans exposition et sans altérité — un pouvoir qui rencontre de moins en moins l’autre : ni l’autre voix, ni l’autre preuve, ni l’autre monde. - -Ce que cette oblitération de la scène archicrative détruit silencieusement, ne se limite pas à la possibilité, pour une parole située, d’instituer le monde : c’est la place même d’où cette parole pouvait le faire. À mesure que la régulation migre des institutions vers les infrastructures, des lois vers les scripts, des délibérations vers les traitements automatiques, ce n’est pas uniquement le cadre du droit ou le rôle de l’État qui se décomposent, mais le théâtre où le pouvoir pouvait être nommé, désigné, contesté. Le politique, en tant qu’épreuve du commun, se trouve peu à peu remplacé par une administration du probable : le monde n’est plus institué par des paroles en conflit ; il est modulé par des dispositifs qui ajustent en continu ce qu’il est possible de voir, de faire et de devenir. - -La scène du pouvoir, historiquement liée à sa *visibilité* (Foucault, *Surveiller et punir*, 1975), s’efface donc dans un régime où ce qui compte n’est plus ce qui est montré, mais ce qui *fonctionne*. L’efficience remplace la légitimité ; la performance supplante la représentation. L’espace du désaccord — central dans toute régulation démocratique, précisément parce qu’il fonde la légitimité sur la pluralité des perspectives — est remplacé par un espace de préemption. Le dissensus n’est plus combattu ni réprimé : il est *rendu impossible* par la structure même du dispositif. C’est là, comme le remarque Grégoire Chamayou dans *La société ingouvernable* (2018), l’un des traits les plus caractéristiques des rationalités néolibérales tardives : neutraliser le politique en le recodant comme un problème d’ingénierie, de gestion du risque, de modélisation du comportement. - -Dans ce cadre, les subjectivités ne sont plus adressées comme *citoyennes*, c’est-à-dire capables de parole, de protestation, de jugement, mais comme *vecteurs de données*, *entités prédictibles*, *flux de comportements à anticiper*. La politique de la reconnaissance cède la place à une politique de l’indexation. Ce que l’on appelle parfois « gouvernementalité numérique » est donc moins un style de gouvernance qu’un déplacement ontologique : les êtres humains ne sont plus traités comme des sujets, mais comme des motifs comportementaux ; leurs actions ne sont plus évaluées mais *corrélées* ; leurs existences ne sont plus situées mais *scorées*. - -Et dans cette dé-subjectivation radicale, la question de la *responsabilité* se dissout. Qui gouverne dans un monde où les décisions sont prises par des chaînes algorithmiques, où les effets sont produits par des corrélations statistiques, où les actions sont motivées par l’opacité de modèles auto-ajustables ? Qui est responsable d’un refus automatique de crédit, d’un bannissement de plateforme, d’un classement discriminatoire ? Où s’exerce la souveraineté, quand la norme n’est plus que l’output d’un processus sans garant ? Cette architecture produit une fragmentation de la responsabilité, une dispersion des actes de pouvoir et une opacification de l’intentionnalité. - -Ce mouvement est parfaitement analysé par Elena Esposito dans *Artificial Communication* (2022), où elle montre que les systèmes de traitement algorithmique produisent des décisions *sans décisionnaire*, des communications *sans énonciateur*, des interactions *sans sujet*. L’archicration oblitérée est ainsi la forme d’un pouvoir qui n’a plus de lieu, plus de nom, plus de scène. Un pouvoir qui tend à ne plus se présenter comme tel, mais qui s’exerce de manière diffuse dans l’automaticité de l’environnement. - -Ce pouvoir, précisément parce qu’il est sans visage, sans adresse, sans exposition, rend impossible le retour critique. Il n’est plus possible de s’opposer à une norme si celle-ci ne se présente jamais comme norme. Il n’est plus possible de disputer une règle si celle-ci n’est jamais formulée. Il n’est plus possible de désigner un adversaire si celui-ci est un protocole, un réseau, un programme. L’archicration oblitérée dissout ainsi *la possibilité même de l’épreuve* — c’est-à-dire la capacité pour un sujet de faire apparaître un désaccord, de le mettre en scène, de l’exiger comme tel. - -En ce sens, nous ne sommes plus dans un monde d’injustice visible, mais dans un monde d’injusticiabilité structurelle. Un monde où la plainte n’a plus de destinataire, où le conflit n’a plus de scène, où la preuve est rendue inutile par le fonctionnement. C’est là l’un des tournants les plus décisifs de notre époque : un pouvoir sans sujet, une norme sans texte, un ordre sans discours — et par conséquent, une régulation sans régulateur, sans contestation, sans réflexivité. Un ordre qui n’a plus besoin de se dire, parce qu’il s’impose dans la forme même de l’interface. - -Ce que révèle avec une acuité implacable l’analyse de l’archicration oblitérée, c’est le basculement d’un paradigme régulatoire fondé sur la conflictualité visible, sur la médiation politique, sur l’exposition des normes à la critique, vers un régime opaque, automatisé, post-délibératif, dans lequel la scène de la régulation elle-même s’est évaporée. Il ne s’agit plus de gouverner par commandement, ni même par contrat : il s’agit de *pré-conditionner l’espace des possibles*, d’*inscrire dans les architectures techniques les normes opératoires*, et de *rendre obsolète toute possibilité d’épreuve partagée*. - -En ce sens, l’archicration contemporaine ne se présente plus comme un processus dialectique entre autorité, légitimation et critique, mais comme une *programmation silencieuse* du monde social. Ce que nous avons nommé *oblitération*, en un sens pleinement phénoménologique et politique, désigne ce processus de disparition simultanée de la scène, du sujet, du dissensus et de la preuve — c’est-à-dire de tout ce qui rend possible la régulation en tant qu’espace institué de conflits réglés, de confrontations arbitrables, de normes négociables. - -Dans cette oblitération, la cratialité — puissance de configuration — devient insaisissable : elle ne s’énonce plus, elle s’injecte dans les dispositifs. L’arcalité — structuration du pensable — devient silencieuse : elle n’impose plus de formes visibles, elle module des environnements d’action. Et l’archicration elle-même, c’est-à-dire la régulation comme scène du pouvoir en tension, s’efface dans l’automatisme des systèmes et l’invisibilité de leurs logiques opératoires. - -Mais cet effacement ne signifie pas disparition du pouvoir : bien au contraire, c’est *le moment où il devient total*, précisément parce qu’il ne se confronte plus à aucune épreuve de légitimation. C’est là l’aporie de la régulation contemporaine : plus elle se veut objective, technique, efficiente, plus elle évacue les conditions mêmes de sa remise en cause, c’est-à-dire sa propre historicité, sa contingence, sa normativité. Elle tend à fonctionner sans plus exposer suffisamment sa propre normativité. - -Le prix de cette efficacité oblitérante, c’est la dissolution du politique — non comme idéologie, mais comme capacité de *reconfigurer le commun*. Et cette dissolution, comme nous allons le voir dans la section suivante, ouvre soit à l’acceptation passive d’un ordre sans alternative, soit à la réinvention d’une nouvelle scène archicratique. Une scène qui, pour exister, devra restituer l’épreuve, repolitiser les normes et refonder la régulation sur l’explicitation des conflits et des valeurs. C’est cette bifurcation, entre permanence de l’effacement et réactivation instituante de la scène, qui fera l’enjeu décisif de la transition vers la cinquième révolution régulatoire. - -### **4.5.4 — Trois figures emblématiques de l’*archicration oblitérée* : crédit social, *nudge*, plateformes** - -Il faut d’abord déconstruire les lectures superficielles du système de crédit social chinois, souvent réduit, dans l’imaginaire occidental, à une dystopie orwellienne, sans examen sérieux de ses fondements structurels ni de ses implications archicratiques. Car ce système ne se contente pas de punir ou récompenser des citoyens en fonction d’un score — il reconfigure entièrement la régulation sociale par la désintermédiation normative. Le crédit social — tel que mis en œuvre depuis les premiers pilotes régionaux en 2009, puis dans sa généralisation planifiée par le document-cadre de 2014 intitulé *Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System —* se déploie en dispositif englobant d’encodage des comportements selon une grammaire algorithmique et situationnelle, appuyée sur un maillage sociotechnique d’acteurs publics et privés. - -Ce système ne repose pas uniquement sur une centralisation totalitaire mais bien sur une architecture distribuée, où différentes municipalités, agences gouvernementales et entreprises collaborent pour établir, pondérer et appliquer des *scores* en fonction d’une multiplicité de données — paiements de dettes, incivilités, déplacements, comportements en ligne, interactions sociales, habitudes de consommation, etc. C’est cette granularité modulaire et cette hybridation des sphères de vie qui en fait une forme d’archicration radicalement oblitérée : les normes ne sont plus énoncées explicitement, les sanctions ne sont plus publiques, les effets sont intégrés aux dispositifs de manière silencieuse — refus de billet de train, ralentissement administratif, exclusion algorithmique. La régulation ne se voit plus, elle s’infiltre. - -En cela, le crédit social incarne une régulation sans scène, sans procès, sans confrontation. Il n’y a pas de moment instituant du droit, pas de conflit visible autour de la norme. L’épreuve régulatoire est dissoute dans la mécanique des flux et des rétroactions. La puissance régulatrice n’est plus exercée frontalement par l’État souverain, mais injectée dans les dispositifs techniques, dans la banque, le téléphone, la porte d’entrée, la borne de transport, la reconnaissance faciale. La citoyenneté devient un statut dynamique, noté, conditionné, ajustable — une *subjectivation sous conditions métriques*, où chaque action est pré-encadrée par une prédiction comportementale normée. - -Le cœur archicratique du dispositif réside ici dans cette anticipation normalisatrice : on ne juge plus ce qui a été fait ; on module ce qui pourrait advenir. C’est l’actualisation comportementale du régime de gouvernementalité algorithmique décrit par Rouvroy et Berns (2013), où le pouvoir opère sans normateur, sans loi, mais à partir des corrélations inférées de l’observation statistique. L’ordre social n’est plus garanti par un principe transcendantal ou contractuel, mais par la conformité à des modèles de comportement calculés à partir des traces. Ce système marque ainsi l’apogée de l’effacement de l’autorité comme scène visible et du conflit comme moteur instituant. Le crédit social s’inscrit dans une logique d’intériorisation algorithmique de la norme, où l'individu est incité à *s’autogouverner* selon les critères d'une rationalité prédictive. L’espace du conflit explicite se réduit fortement : la norme tend à imprégner l’environnement. - -Enfin, cette archicration oblitérée se pare d’un discours de *confiance*, de *morale civique*, et de *responsabilité collective*, venant dissimuler son caractère disciplinaire. Le langage de la bienveillance et de la transparence est utilisé pour légitimer une ingénierie sociale totalisante. La norme devient un bien public, la surveillance devient un service, et la conformité devient une vertu civique. C’est là l’un des paradoxes majeurs de l’archicration moderne : elle se naturalise dans l'infrastructure même de la vie sociale, et se rend méconnaissable comme pouvoir. Le crédit social n’est donc pas une exception autoritaire : il est une forme extrême et paradigmatique d’un régime de régulation post-disciplinaire, où la scène, le garant et la contre-épreuve tendent à s’effacer. En ce sens, il constitue le miroir grossissant de la gouvernementalité algorithmique mondialisée, bien au-delà de la Chine. - -Si le système chinois de crédit social incarne l’un des sommets contemporains de l’archicration oblitérée par la quantification exhaustive et le pilotage panoptique des conduites, il n’en représente pourtant qu’une des modalités, de type principalement étatique et centralisé. Mais l’effacement de l’épreuve régulatrice, dans la contemporanéité occidentale comme dans la sphère globale, ne passe pas toujours par la monumentalité algorithmique ni par le paradigme du score intégral. Il opère aussi — et peut-être plus insidieusement encore — à travers des formes douces, latérales, modulantes, où la contrainte se dissimule sous les traits de la suggestion. Le pouvoir ne se manifeste plus par l’énoncé d’un seuil ou la menace d’une sanction, mais par l’agencement silencieux des conditions d’adhésion. Là où le crédit social trace une ligne entre ce qui est permis et ce qui est exclu, le *nudge* reconfigure l’environnement pour rendre une option plus probable, plus désirable, plus commode. C’est à ce seuil que s’ouvre une autre figure emblématique de l’archicration oblitérée : *la régulation comportementale par l’architecture du choix*. - -Le *nudge* n’est pas une simple méthode de persuasion : il est l’expression emblématique d’un tournant fondamental dans la manière contemporaine de penser l’exercice du pouvoir. Élaboré et popularisé par Richard Thaler et Cass Sunstein dans leur ouvrage fondateur *Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness* (2008), le nudge se donne pour objectif d’*orienter les comportements individuels sans coercition*, en agissant sur les « architectures du choix ». Il ne s’agit plus de prescrire, d’interdire ou d’imposer, mais d’organiser l’environnement décisionnel de manière à *influencer implicitement* la conduite des sujets. - -Or ce déplacement est absolument crucial dans le contexte de notre thèse sur l’archicration oblitérée. Car le *nudge* opère non seulement un *effacement du normateur* — plus de loi identifiable, plus d’autorité explicite — mais aussi une *dissimulation complète du dissensus*. Le sujet n’est plus interpellé par une règle ou confronté à une alternative explicitement conflictuelle. Il est doucement dirigé vers la « bonne » décision, selon des critères qui ne sont jamais mis en débat, mais naturalisés dans la forme même de la situation. On ne dit pas : « Tu dois faire cela. » On crée une situation telle que, *statistiquement*, « tu feras cela ». L’autorité devient invisible, mais d’autant plus opérante. - -Le *nudge* repose sur des modélisations issues des sciences comportementales, en particulier de la *behavioral economics* et de la *psychologie cognitive*. Il instrumentalise les biais cognitifs, comme l’aversion à la perte, l’effet de cadrage, le biais de statu quo, pour produire des effets comportementaux sans passage par la conscience réflexive. En cela, il constitue une régulation qui contourne largement la délibération réflexive, pour reprendre les termes de Dan Ariely (*Predictably Irrational*, 2008). Le nudge ne vise pas à convaincre ou à délibérer, mais à *court-circuiter la décision par l’architecture*. - -Ce type de régulation tend à neutraliser la dimension archicratique comme scène visible, tout en conservant une forte effectivité régulatrice. Il exerce une force réelle sur le comportement, sans que cette force ne soit repérable comme telle. La puissance de contrainte est déplacée dans l’environnement. Le pouvoir n’est plus ce qui interdit, mais ce qui configure. Et cette configuration repose sur une *asymétrie radicale de savoir* : seuls ceux qui conçoivent les environnements de choix connaissent les effets du dispositif. Le citoyen, le patient, l’usager, l’élève, le travailleur sont devenus des cibles statistiques, modélisables et ajustables, selon les modalités de ce que Sunstein nomme *paternalisme libertarien* — oxymore révélateur s’il en est. La liberté est conservée *formellement*, mais elle est régulée *structurellement*. Ce n’est plus une liberté politique, mais une liberté calibrée. - -L’*archicration oblitérée* atteint ici une forme particulièrement insidieuse : le *nudge* ne se contente pas de produire de l’obéissance, il produit de l’adhésion implicite. Il tend à réduire l’espace du conflit et à rendre plus improbable le moment explicite de la désobéissance. Car désobéir à quoi, si la norme n’est plus énoncée ? Comment contester un dispositif qui se contente d’organiser la présentation des options ? Le sujet est enserré dans une régulation sans scène, sans codification, sans interlocuteur. Ce que produit le nudge, c’est l’*effacement de l’épreuve normative*, au profit d’une *mécanique d’adoption prévisible*. - -De plus, le nudge trouve sa pleine efficacité dans les environnements numérisés, les interfaces logicielles, les parcours utilisateurs algorithmisés. Il s’intègre parfaitement aux logiques de *design comportemental*, où l’interface devient elle-même l’opérateur régulateur : options par défaut, notifications, feedbacks instantanés, personnalisation adaptative. Le *choice architecture* devient *interface architecture*. En cela, le nudge s’insère directement dans le prolongement des régimes cybernétiques décrits précédemment : *rétroaction douce*, *pilotage implicite*, *auto-modulation comportementale*. - -Mais ce modèle de régulation soulève une contradiction fondamentale : à mesure que le pouvoir se rend invisible, il devient *irréfutable*. Le nudge n’est pas une norme discutable, c’est une situation. Et comme l’ont souligné critiques et philosophes (notamment Evgeny Morozov dans *To Save Everything, Click Here*, 2013), ce déplacement de la norme vers la technique produit un effet d’irresponsabilité généralisée. Si personne ne prescrit, qui peut être contesté ? Si personne n’ordonne, qui peut être tenu pour responsable ? Le nudge n’abolit pas formellement la liberté ; il tend à en reconfigurer techniquement les conditions d’exercice. - -Ainsi, le nudge s’impose comme une *figure paradigmatique de l’archicration oblitérée* : une régulation sans conflit, sans loi, sans sujet, mais d’une efficacité normative redoutable. Il incarne le basculement contemporain de l’autorité vers l’environnement, du commandement vers l’interface, de la loi vers la disposition. Il est la forme douce d’un pouvoir qui ne se nomme plus comme tel, mais règle, module, ajuste et anticipe. Il est l’invisibilisation politique de la régulation. - -Mais cette gouvernance par la disposition douce et la modulation prévisible n’est elle-même que l’un des visages d’un basculement plus vaste encore : celui par lequel la scène de régulation se trouve *entièrement absorbée* par l’infrastructure même de l’environnement numérique. Car si le *nudge* opère dans des configurations locales, ponctuelles, situationnelles, les *plateformes numériques*, elles, déploient un *régime total* de structuration de l’action, du discours, de la visibilité et de la valeur. Elles ne se contentent pas de suggérer — elles *configurent l’accès au réel*. Elles ne proposent pas une orientation discrète — elles *inscrivent les normes dans les logiques d’interaction, les protocoles de publication, les métriques d’évaluation*. C’est dans cet horizon que l’archicration oblitérée atteint son seuil critique : celui d’un *pouvoir algorithmique sans dehors*, où toute épreuve est internalisée dans les règles d’un système sans sujet, sans scène et sans garant. C’est cette figure — la plateforme comme forme avancée d’archicration — qu’il nous faut maintenant analyser. - -L’apparition et la généralisation des plateformes numériques constituent l’une des mutations majeures de la régulation moderne. Non pas parce qu’elles introduiraient un nouvel acteur du pouvoir (elles ne sont ni État, ni marché au sens traditionnel), ni même parce qu’elles modifieraient seulement les modalités techniques de l’intermédiation sociale, mais parce qu’elles redéfinissent *ontologiquement* la scène même sur laquelle toute régulation devient possible. Les plateformes — Uber, Amazon, Facebook/Meta, Google, TikTok, Airbnb, etc. — sont devenues, en moins de deux décennies, des formes englobantes d’organisation des pratiques humaines, où visibilité, valeur, circulation et reconnaissance sociale sont de plus en plus conditionnées par des logiques d’inscription algorithmique. - -Ce que nous désignons ici comme archicration oblitérée trouve dans ces dispositifs une forme pleinement opératoire : la régulation n’est plus énoncée, elle est *programmée* ; elle n’est plus débattue, elle est *codée* ; elle ne résulte plus d’un processus de légitimation sociale, mais d’une ingénierie continue des interactions. L’usager n’est plus confronté à une règle extérieure qu’il pourrait contester, négocier, transgresser : il est *pris dans la maille d’un système auto-régulé*, qui encode à chaque instant les conditions de son action, les critères de son évaluation, la logique de son classement. Et ce sans qu’aucune scène publique, aucun espace de conflit ou de désaccord explicite ne soit véritablement constitué. *Le pouvoir ne gouverne plus à partir du sommet : il circule dans les interfaces.* +Ce qui caractérise l'arcalité propre à la phase bio-algocratique n'est +plus la visibilité des infrastructures ni leur extériorité tangible, +mais leur intégration silencieuse dans l'usage. L'arcalité contemporaine +ne s'abolit pas ; elle se loge désormais dans les objets, les interfaces +et les environnements numériques, d'autant plus efficacement qu'elle +échappe à l'intuition commune. Elle n'impose plus frontalement ; elle +préconfigure les conditions de l'agir. Le smartphone en offre l'exemple +paradigmatique : non comme simple outil, mais comme opérateur d'arcalité +capable de localiser, synchroniser, trier et moduler l'ensemble des +interactions ordinaires. Ce déplacement de la régulation vers la logique +du service est encore renforcé par le récit technolibéral de la +transparence : l'interface simple et conviviale dissimule en réalité les +chaînes de collecte, d'interopérabilité et de hiérarchisation qui +structurent les usages. La conséquence politique majeure en est la +difficulté croissante à identifier le pouvoir comme tel : la régulation +n'est pas moins présente ; elle est davantage intégrée aux conditions +mêmes de l'action. + +Cette invisibilisation a une conséquence politique décisive : elle rend +le pouvoir plus difficile à identifier comme tel. Là où les régimes +modernes articulaient encore légitimité de l'autorité et possibilité de +sa mise en question, la régulation bio-algocratique tend à prévenir le +dissensus en amont, en l'intégrant aux conditions mêmes de l'action. Le +pouvoir n'est pas moins présent qu'auparavant ; il est plus profondément +enfoui dans les milieux de vie, et d'autant plus efficace qu'il se +présente comme simple facilitation. + +À mesure qu'elle se retire de l'expérience ordinaire, l'arcalité +contemporaine s'intensifie à l'échelle planétaire sous la forme +d'architectures numériques distribuées. Le paradoxe est décisif : plus +ces infrastructures structurent la vie sociale, cognitive et politique, +moins elles sont perçues. Là où les réseaux ferroviaires, les plans +d'urbanisme ou les grands travaux d'État inscrivaient visiblement le +pouvoir dans l'espace, l'infrastructure numérique opère selon un régime +d'opacité : câbles sous-marins, data centers, serveurs racines et +infrastructures de cloud, protocoles de routage et standards +interconnectés composent une géopolitique matérielle de la régulation +sans centre immédiatement identifiable ni scène critique unifiée. +L'espace numérique ne relève donc pas d'une pure abstraction : il est +massivement territorialisé dans ses supports, mais politiquement dérobé +dans ses modes d'effectuation. + +Les câbles sous-marins, qui acheminent l'essentiel du trafic Internet +mondial, constituent un exemple paradigmatique de cette arcalité +invisible. Infrastructures stratégiques, opérées par un nombre restreint +d'acteurs privés ou hybrides, ils forment la charpente réelle de +l'espace numérique tout en échappant largement au regard public et à la +délibération démocratique. Leur matérialité est massive ; leur régime de +pouvoir, largement opaque. + +Les data centers prolongent cette logique. Loin d'être de simples +entrepôts d'information, ils constituent des nœuds de stockage, de +traitement, de hiérarchisation et de corrélation qui conditionnent +concrètement ce qui sera visible, accessible, recommandé, priorisé ou +relégué. En ce sens, ils participent directement à la configuration +pratique du réel. + +Cette matérialité de l'arcalité invisible est redoublée par une +architecture logique de protocoles — TCP/IP, DNS, BGP, HTTPS — dont +les standards sont élaborés dans des espaces techniques largement +soustraits aux cadres politiques classiques. L'opacité n'y est pas +accidentelle : elle est constitutive. L'utilisateur accède à des +interfaces ; les couches décisives de la régulation lui demeurent +hermétiques. Le pouvoir est ici moins simplement caché que difficile à +totaliser dans une scène unique, parce qu'il est distribué, fragmenté et +hautement technique. + +C'est là le cœur de l'arcalité invisible : une régulation diffractée +dans les objets, les couches protocolaires et les infrastructures +distantes, qui détermine profondément les conditions d'accès, de +visibilité, de participation et de reconnaissance sans se laisser +aisément localiser dans une scène politique identifiable. Elle produit +ainsi un monde techniquement opérable, mais politiquement difficile à +lire. + +L'un des traits les plus pernicieux de cette arcalité invisible réside +dans l'effacement progressif des médiations politiques, sociales et +symboliques au profit d'une régulation présentée comme technique, neutre +et fonctionnelle. À mesure que la gouvernance s'automatise par le biais +de l'infrastructure, elle se soustrait aux formes instituées du débat, +de la représentation et de la délibération. Le pouvoir ne disparaît pas +: il est recodé sous forme d'exigences techniques, de procédures +sécuritaires, de standards interopérables et de normes d'efficacité. Il +devient d'autant plus difficile à traiter politiquement qu'il se +présente désormais comme déjà préfiguré dans l'architecture même des +dispositifs. + +Ce processus d'effacement ne s'opère pas frontalement, mais par +glissement progressif des fonctions régulatrices vers des dispositifs +techniques autojustifiés. L'exemple paradigmatique en est fourni par les +algorithmes de classement et de visibilité propres aux plateformes +numériques — moteurs de recherche, réseaux sociaux, marketplaces — où le critère régulateur n'est plus le droit, ni même une morale sociale +explicitement formulée, mais une fonction de ranking : pertinence +calculée, taux de clic, engagement moyen, compatibilité avec les CGU. La +scène de la délibération ne disparaît pas parce qu'elle serait réfutée ; +elle est contournée et remplacée par l'ajustement silencieux de +paramètres inaccessibles. + +Cette transformation relève d'une dépolitisation par intégration +fonctionnelle. Les conflits sont absorbés, neutralisés, reprogrammés +sous la forme de problèmes d'architecture, de mise à l'échelle, de +sécurité ou d'optimisation de la bande passante. Ce qui relevait d'une +tension entre valeurs devient affaire de performance technique. +L'archicration, ici, ne s'exerce plus prioritairement comme pouvoir +instituant visible, mais comme tendance à la stabilisation automatique, +infra-politisée, agissant sans apparaître, décidant sans se nommer, +régulant sans s'exposer à l'interrogation publique. + +On a pu décrire ce phénomène sous les noms de technopouvoir ou de +technogouvernance ; mais ces termes demeurent trop vagues s'ils ne +saisissent pas le phénomène précis que nous visons ici : la +décomposition des médiations symboliques — lois, institutions, débats, +représentants — au profit d'un encodage des rapports sociaux dans des +objets techniques, eux-mêmes produits par des acteurs non élus, situés +hors du champ classique de la souveraineté. Comme l'a montré Benjamin +Bratton dans *The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty* (2016), la +souveraineté n'est plus principalement verticale : elle devient +stratifiée, exercée à travers des couches logicielles, des plateformes, +des standards et des systèmes d'exploitation qui opèrent largement à +distance des frontières territoriales comme des décisions collectives +explicites. + +Le rôle des plateformes globales — GAFA, BATX, acteurs de la fintech, +infrastructures de cloud, opérateurs de téléphonie transcontinentale — est ici décisif. Elles produisent l'environnement même dans lequel les +autres acteurs opèrent, sans être elles-mêmes soumises aux mécanismes +classiques de responsabilité. Leur pouvoir agit en amont des catégories +classiques du politique : elles définissent ce qu'il est possible de +faire, de dire, de voir et d'échanger, non pas d'abord par interdiction, +mais par design. C'est ce que Shoshana Zuboff a décrit comme une forme +de *surveillance capitalism* dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* +(2019), mais qu'il faut ici reformuler plus rigoureusement : non pas +seulement un capitalisme qui surveille, mais une régulation qui +s'invisibilise dans les architectures matérielles de la vie connectée. + +Ce qu'il y a de plus grave, dans cette configuration, n'est pas +seulement l'existence d'un pouvoir non élu, mais la difficulté +croissante à le désigner comme pouvoir. Il s'efface derrière la solution +technique, le choix d'architecture, l'argument d'efficacité ou le récit +de l'innovation. Il ne s'assume plus : il se dissout dans les +procédures. Et cette dissolution rend la critique plus difficile, non +parce qu'elle abolirait la domination, mais parce qu'elle en disperse +les lieux, en obscurcit les ressorts et en complique l'assignation. + +La radicalisation contemporaine de l'arcalité invisible ne saurait être +comprise sans une analyse précise de ses dispositifs concrets, inscrits +dans des architectures matérielles, des réseaux de traitement et des +régimes juridiques hybrides. Ces infrastructures, souvent soustraites à +la perception ordinaire, portent la matrice opératoire d'une +archicration sans visage, où les acteurs du pouvoir ne se réduisent plus +aux États ou aux institutions, mais incluent plateformes, +câblo-opérateurs, data centers et consortiums transnationaux. + +Le cas de la surveillance distribuée, révélé notamment à partir de 2013 +par Edward Snowden, en fournit une illustration nette. Les programmes +PRISM, XKeyscore, Tempora ou Upstream reposent non sur des interceptions +ciblées, mais sur la captation systématique de métadonnées en transit +sur les infrastructures globales, en coopération étroite entre agences +étatiques — telles que la NSA ou le GCHQ — et grandes entreprises +numériques. Il ne s'agit plus d'intercepter des intentions, mais de +cartographier des comportements. Cette architecture produit un pouvoir +panoptique sans centre, automatisé, distribué, permanent, dans lequel la +distinction entre sécurité et exploitation commerciale devient +difficilement discernable. + +Un second exemple réside dans les data centers, que l'on peut qualifier +de territoires algorithmico-énergétiques. Des sites tels que ceux de +Google à The Dalles, des infrastructures suédoises d'EcoDataCenter, ou +des complexes de Tencent et Alibaba en Chine concentrent aujourd'hui la +mémoire active du monde social numérisé. Leur sécurité, leur capacité de +traitement et leur intégration dans des réseaux propriétaires en font +des nœuds décisifs de la gouvernance algorithmique. Leur souveraineté +n'est pas juridique mais opératoire : ils déterminent les conditions +effectives d'accès, de hiérarchisation et de circulation de +l'information. Le pouvoir ne s'y exprime plus par autorisation, mais par +configuration. + +Enfin, l'expansion des grandes plateformes globales — Amazon, Google, +Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Tencent, Alibaba — manifeste ce que Saskia +Sassen a décrit comme une dénationalisation partielle de l'autorité. Ces +acteurs n'agissent plus seulement comme entreprises : ils définissent +des normes, régulent des échanges, arbitrent des litiges, et structurent +les conditions mêmes de l'action sociale. Leur pouvoir ne repose pas +d'abord sur l'interdiction, mais sur la définition des possibles : +visibilité, accès, interaction, reconnaissance. + +Le point critique tient alors à leur mode de légitimation : ces +dispositifs sont moins validés par le droit que par l'usage. +L'agrégation des comportements — clics, engagements, interactions — produit un horizon normatif itératif, où la règle émerge du flux plutôt +qu'elle ne le précède. La souveraineté devient émulative, la norme +procédurale, et le politique tend à se dissoudre dans la dynamique des +pratiques. + +C'est à ce niveau que la démonstration bascule : le pouvoir contemporain +ne réside plus prioritairement dans les institutions, mais dans les +infrastructures. Il ne se légitime plus principalement par la loi, mais +par l'usage ; il ne se confronte plus frontalement au collectif, mais +s'inscrit dans ses pratiques. Il devient ainsi régulation sans scène, +autorité sans figure, domination sans voix. + +Ce que révèle, en sa profondeur critique, l'arcalité invisible +contemporaine, ce n'est pas seulement une mutation technique ou une +inflexion logistique de la régulation, mais une reconfiguration radicale +du rapport au réel, au pouvoir et à la scène elle-même. Là où les formes +classiques d'arcalité — disciplinaires, infrastructurelles ou +cybernétiques — reposaient encore sur des dispositifs relativement +visibles, situés, incarnés dans des territoires, des institutions et des +normes repérables, la forme née de la quatrième révolution industrielle +efface progressivement ses propres conditions d'existence. Elle ne +s'exhibe plus : elle s'infiltre. Elle ne régule plus frontalement : elle +préconfigure. Elle ne spatialise plus l'ordre : elle en redéfinit +silencieusement les protocoles. + +La force de cette arcalité tient précisément à son invisibilité. Parce +qu'elle se retire hors scène, hors langage et hors controverse, elle +exerce un pouvoir d'autant plus décisif. Le réel n'est plus structuré +d'abord par des mots d'ordre, des lois ou des injonctions, mais par +l'architecture technique, la couche protocolaire et la configuration par +défaut. Comme le souligne Benjamin Bratton dans *The Stack* (2016), +émerge ainsi un pouvoir architectural, dans lequel les conditions +matérielles et logicielles de l'existence produisent une régulation +automatique fondée sur les formes d'accès, les permissions d'interface +et les modalités d'interopérabilité. C'est dans la grammaire du code, +dans la topologie des câbles et dans la géopolitique des data centers +que s'écrit désormais une part décisive de la condition d'existence du +monde humain connecté. + +Mais cette invisibilité n'est pas uniquement un effacement esthétique ; +elle a une portée proprement politique. Ce qui disparaît ici, au-delà de +la visibilité du pouvoir, c'est la possibilité même de sa mise en +question. Il n'y a plus de scène pour contester, plus de centre à +désigner, plus de texte à interpréter. Il n'y a plus que des flux à +optimiser, des interfaces à améliorer, des algorithmes à ajuster. Le +pouvoir devient effet d'efficacité. L'archicration ne se proclame plus : +elle se déploie sans dire son nom, à travers des scripts, des normes +techniques, des API et des conditions d'usage. C'est une régulation à +régulateur effacé, un pilotage à pilote absent, une autorité à sujet +dissous. + +Et c'est précisément là que réside le cœur de notre thèse : +l'archicration contemporaine, dans sa forme arcalitaire la plus avancée, +n'a pas disparu ; elle s'est oblitérée. Elle ne s'est pas effondrée : +elle s'est retirée de la scène pour mieux s'incarner dans +l'environnement même. Cette arcalité invisible constitue l'une des +formes les plus puissantes et les plus insidieuses de la régulation +contemporaine. Elle n'impose plus d'abord des formes : elle produit +l'habitude de leur évidence. Elle ne cherche plus prioritairement à +convaincre : elle organise les conditions de possibilité du pensable. +Elle ne sanctionne pas seulement : elle configure les possibles. + +Ainsi se clôt la section 4.5.1. Mais loin de clore une époque, elle +ouvre une problématique décisive : que devient l'expérience humaine dans +un monde régulé sans visage, sans épreuve et sans friction apparente ? +La réponse — ou du moins les lignes de faille de cette régulation +invisible — commence à s'esquisser dans la montée d'un nouveau régime +de puissance, plus préhensif, plus intime et plus prédictif : la +cratialité anticipatoire. C'est à cette inflexion que nous consacrons +maintenant la section 4.5.2. + +### **4.5.2 — *Cratialité anticipatoire* : captation attentionnelle, algorithmes de prédiction, IA comportementale** + +L'un des basculements les plus décisifs dans l'histoire contemporaine de +la régulation sociale ne s'est pas produit dans le fracas des armes ou +la mobilisation visible des masses, mais dans le glissement progressif, +quasi imperceptible, d'un pouvoir agissant par la force à un pouvoir +opérant par captation. Ce passage, que nous désignons ici comme +l'émergence d'une cratialité anticipatoire, ne renvoie pas à une simple +inflexion technique ni à une amélioration instrumentale de la +gouvernance, mais à une reconfiguration profonde des modalités mêmes de +la puissance : l'anticipation devient l'acte régulateur par excellence. +La force, qui jadis s'imposait frontalement se déploie désormais sous la +forme d'un pouvoir prédictif, d'une intelligence comportementale +distribuée, d'un dispositif d'extraction attentionnelle continu. + +Ce nouveau régime cratial émerge sur le terreau de trois dynamiques +convergentes, qu'il nous faut articuler méthodiquement : d'abord, la +captation des signaux faibles, c'est-à-dire la capacité à identifier, +parmi les flux d'actions, de clics, de mouvements et de gestes, des +indices infimes de comportements potentiels ; ensuite, la modélisation +prédictive, qui transforme ces signaux en patterns exploitables à des +fins de guidage, d'orientation ou de redirection des conduites ; enfin, +l'automatisation du retour, par laquelle la boucle entre observation, +calcul et modification se referme sans intervention humaine. Il ne +s'agit plus seulement de surveiller, ni même de gouverner : il s'agit +d'*influencer avant l'acte*, *d'orienter avant la conscience*, *de +configurer avant la décision*. + +Cette mutation constitue un tournant paradigmatique dans l'histoire +archicratique de la régulation moderne : la puissance ne se conçoit plus +seulement comme tension entre autorité formelle et comportements des +sujets, mais comme pré-configuration anticipatrice des conduites. La +règle précédait l'action. La norme encadrait le possible. Mais avec +l'avènement des techniques dites d'*IA comportementale*, notamment à +partir de l'essor massif de l'apprentissage automatique (*machine +learning*) dans les années 2010, le rapport s'inverse : l'action est +préemptée par le calcul, le comportement devient la matière première du +pouvoir, et la prédiction remplace la prescription. Il ne s'agit plus de +dire ce qui est permis ou interdit : il s'agit d'ajuster, en temps réel, +ce qui est probable ou improbable, désirable ou indésirable, rentable ou +inefficace. + +Cette *cratialité anticipatrice* opère ainsi un enchaînement sans +épreuve : elle n'exige ni force physique, ni dispositif répressif, ni +même visibilité du pouvoir. Elle repose sur une captation diffuse de +l'attention et une reconstruction permanente des trajectoires probables. +Comme le souligne Shoshana Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance +Capitalism* (2019), nous assistons à l'invention d'un "exil de l'action" +: le sujet agit de plus en plus dans une gamme d'actions déjà +identifiées comme prédictibles, mais depuis la gamme restreinte des +actions déjà identifiées comme prédictibles, monétisables et +exploitables. + +C'est en ce sens que la *cratialité anticipatrice* ne peut être réduite +à une modalité douce ou subtile du contrôle. Elle est au contraire l'une +des formes les plus avancées, les plus préhensiles et les plus +imperceptibles de la domination. Là où la force disciplinait le corps, +la prédiction capture le futur. Là où le pouvoir imposait un ordre, il +configure dorénavant les marges de l'imprévisible. L'anticipation +devient non plus une stratégie, mais une structure — un opérateur +ontologique de la régulation contemporaine. Il nous faut à présent en +décortiquer les mécanismes, les opérateurs, les matérialisations +concrètes. + +La *captation attentionnelle* n'est pas un phénomène annexe ou marginal +dans l'économie contemporaine des puissances : elle en constitue le +socle infrastructurel et le point d'entrée cratial. En d'autres termes, +il n'est pas exagéré d'affirmer qu'à partir des années 2010, avec +l'essor exponentiel des interfaces numériques, des objets connectés et +des plateformes globalisées (Google, Facebook, TikTok, Amazon, etc.), la +valeur régulatrice du sujet s'est trouvée fondamentalement reconfigurée. +Ce n'est plus la force de travail ni même la capacité de consommation +qui définit l'être social, mais son attention disponible, son exposition +comportementale, sa mobilité prédictive dans l'espace des corrélations +statistiques. La *cratialité* se déploie alors selon une *logique de +captation comportementale*, au sens de B.J. Fogg — c'est-à-dire comme +science de la capture des comportements via le design interactif, +l'ajustement micro-intentionnel et la modulation algorithmique des +sollicitations. + +La plateforme numérique agit alors comme une scène archicratique +oblitérée mais d'une efficacité considérable, dans laquelle chaque clic, +chaque défilement, chaque pause visuelle devient un événement +significatif pour la modélisation. La subjectivité est ici réduite à une +succession d'actes faibles, d'autant plus gouvernables qu'ils semblent +anodins. Cette réduction, qui transforme la personne en profil, le geste +en probabilité et la temporalité vécue en signal exploitable, constitue +l'une des matrices opératoires de la cratialité anticipatrice. La force +n'est plus mobilisée contre l'individu : elle s'enclenche depuis ses +propres micro-données. + +Il faut ici convoquer les travaux de Rouvroy et Berns (2013), mais aussi +ceux de Zuboff (2019) ou d'Yves Citton (*Pour une écologie de +l'attention*, 2014), pour comprendre que ce qui est en jeu dans ce +régime attentionnel n'est pas seulement la marchandisation de la +concentration, mais l'organisation d'un pouvoir régulateur fondé sur la +visibilité préemptive de l'individu. Ce n'est plus l'institution qui +observe le sujet : c'est le système qui absorbe sa présence même pour +recalculer en permanence la meilleure manière de faire persévérer ses +trajectoires. + +Ainsi se met en place un régime de l'anticipation comportementale, dans +lequel la donnée n'est jamais un reflet, mais toujours un levier. +L'algorithme ne cherche pas à comprendre, mais à orienter. La +modélisation n'est pas interprétative, elle est *instrumentale*. Le +sujet n'est plus le point d'origine d'un vouloir : il devient le nœud +d'un faisceau de corrélations comportementales qui configurent son +avenir sans son consentement, parfois même sans sa conscience. + +Ce régime est à la fois d'une puissance remarquable — puisqu'il +gouverne sans apparaître — et d'une fragilité réelle — puisque toute +sa cohérence dépend de la stabilité des modèles, de la permanence des +signaux, et de la clôture des systèmes de calcul. Nous le verrons plus +loin, c'est précisément cette tension qui rend la cratialité +anticipatoire à la fois redoutablement efficace et potentiellement +vulnérable à ses propres excès. + +Ce que le passage de la simple automatisation à l'intelligence +artificielle comportementale institue, ce n'est pas uniquement un +changement d'échelle dans le traitement des données, mais bien une +mutation profonde dans la *nature* même de l'opération régulatoire. L'IA +n'est pas un outil de plus dans la panoplie technique des dispositifs de +contrôle : elle est, dans sa version comportementale, un actant +régulateur autonome, capable non seulement de lire les signaux, mais de +produire les conditions mêmes de leur apparition, de leur modulation et +de leur incorporation dans des boucles d'ajustement systémique. +Autrement dit, l'IA devient *un opérateur régulateur sans intériorité*, +un agent de gouvernance sans intention ni discours, un dispositif +purement fonctionnel, mais redoutablement efficace dans sa capacité à +engendrer des comportements régulés. + +Cette transformation est d'autant plus radicale qu'elle ne repose pas +sur un schéma classique de pouvoir émetteur-récepteur, mais sur une +génération en boucle fermée de stimuli, de réponses et de +renormalisations. L'IA comportementale — qu'elle soit déployée dans +les modèles de recommandation, les assistants virtuels, les outils +d'évaluation automatisée ou les systèmes de crédit social — fonctionne +comme un moteur d'adaptation prédictive : elle ajuste les comportements +à une norme non exprimée, mais calculée, en amont même de leur +déploiement. + +C'est là le cœur du basculement archicratique : Le pouvoir cesse d'être +d'abord prescriptif (tu dois faire) ; il agit désormais en amont de +l'action elle-même (tu feras ce qui est prédit). Cette logique est celle +que décrivent admirablement O'Neil (2016) dans *Weapons of Math +Destruction* et Shoshana Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance +Capitalism* (2019) : la norme n'est plus une injonction morale, +juridique ou politique, elle est une dérivation statistique intégrée +dans des réseaux de corrélations suffisamment vastes pour rendre caduque +toute singularité. La liberté elle-même est absorbée comme variable +d'ajustement, comme résidu probabilisable. + +Cette condition nouvelle du sujet — non plus seulement gouverné, mais +intégré dans un moteur de prédiction — redéfinit en profondeur les +cadres classiques de l'analyse politique, sociologique et éthique. L'IA +comportementale ne vise pas le bien, le juste, le vrai, le légitime ; +elle vise l'optimisation, l'efficacité, la continuité fluide d'un flux +de comportements modélisés. La tension fondamentale entre liberté et +régulation, qui fondait les théories modernes de la démocratie, de +l'éthique ou du droit, est ici court-circuitée par une rationalité +cybernétique pure : celle du minimum de friction, du maximum d'adhérence +au modèle. + +Dans ce contexte, il est absolument essentiel de comprendre que la +régulation prédictive opérée par les IA comportementales produit un +effondrement de la scène politique : il n'y a plus de débat, plus de +négociation, plus de désaccord visible. Une part croissante des +conduites est absorbée dans la prévision et rendue compatible avec la +trajectoire la plus probable. La conflictualité n'est plus niée : elle +est désamorcée en amont. Le dissensus tend à être absorbé dans le +signal. + +Et c'est cette dissimulation de l'épreuve régulatoire, cette +invisibilisation du moment archicratique, qui constitue le véritable +enjeu critique de la cratialité anticipatoire contemporaine. Car si le +pouvoir s'exerce désormais sans sujet, sans adresse et sans autorité +visible, il devient d'autant plus difficile à contester, à dénoncer ou à +renverser. L'instance à contester n'est plus le tyran, le maître ou le +censeur ; elle tend à se déplacer vers l'algorithme, la plateforme et le +protocole. Un pouvoir difficile à localiser, à nommer et à incarner. + +Pour en saisir les formes concrètes, il faut examiner les principaux +lieux de déploiement des régulations prédictives automatisées. Les cas +paradigmatiques de la publicité comportementale, des systèmes de +notation sociale et des algorithmes de scoring révèlent à la fois la +puissance, l'ubiquité et l'opacité des dispositifs par lesquels +l'anticipation algorithmique modèle les comportements humains, +transforme les subjectivités, et redessine les hiérarchies sociales sans +recours au débat public. + +Prenons tout d'abord l'exemple des *publicités prédictives* pilotées par +les géants du capitalisme de plateforme. Google, Facebook, Amazon, +TikTok ou encore X (ex-Twitter) ne se contentent pas de proposer des +produits ou des contenus : ils organisent une architecture +attentionnelle dans laquelle l'offre précède le désir, où la suggestion +anticipe le besoin, et où la pertinence algorithmique remplace +l'intention réflexive. Le cœur de cette économie est ce que Zuboff nomme +la *capture de surplus comportemental* — c'est-à-dire l'extraction de +micro-données (clics, pauses, scrolls, vues incomplètes, timing de +réaction) qui permettent de construire un modèle dynamique de +l'utilisateur, non pas dans son identité mais dans sa propension. Le +ciblage publicitaire ne répond plus à une demande : il la préfigure. Il +fonctionne comme un dispositif d'orientation des trajectoires +attentionnelles, dans une logique d'adhérence probabilisée. On ne vend +plus des biens : on vend des probabilités de conversion. Ce pouvoir +algorithmique préfiguratif instaure une scène de régulation où le +possible tend à être normé avant d'être choisi. + +Un second domaine particulièrement révélateur est celui des *systèmes de +notation comportementale* qui, dans plusieurs contextes étatiques ou +corporatifs, visent à intégrer la régulation sociale dans un modèle +d'incitation algorithmique. Le cas du système de crédit social chinois +reste le plus emblématique, même si sa complexité est souvent +caricaturée en Occident. Il ne s'agit pas d'un système unique et +centralisé, mais d'une constellation de programmes pilotes, locaux, +sectoriels, articulés à la fois sur des données administratives (impôts, +casiers judiciaires, comportements civiques) et sur des indicateurs plus +subjectifs (évaluations de pairs, réputation en ligne, conformité aux +règles de copropriété, etc.). Le tout est indexé à des sanctions et des +privilèges : limitation de déplacements, accès différencié au crédit, à +l'emploi ou à l'éducation. Ce modèle réalise une véritable *archicration +anticipative* : il ne punit pas rétroactivement, il pré-structure les +comportements par un maillage d'incitations systémiques, dans une +logique d'ajustement social global. Le pouvoir ne dit plus « tu n'as pas +le droit » ; il inscrit l'illégitimité dans le *score*, dans l'indice, +dans la réputation calculée. + +Enfin, un troisième champ d'analyse critique se situe dans les *systèmes +de scoring algorithmique appliqués à l'emploi, à l'assurance, à l'accès +au logement, ou encore à la justice prédictive*. Ces systèmes, souvent +sous-traités à des prestataires privés, fonctionnent comme des boîtes +noires décisionnelles, fondées sur des jeux de données historiques +biaisées, sur des corrélations implicites non vérifiées, et sur des +seuils de décision totalement opaques. Les logiciels de tri de CV +utilisés dans le recrutement automatisé (ex : HireVue, Pymetrics), les +systèmes de scoring de solvabilité (ex : FICO aux États-Unis), ou encore +les algorithmes prédictifs de récidive utilisés par la justice pénale +américaine (ex : COMPAS) constituent des régimes de cratialité sans +visage : personne ne décide, mais tout est décidé. Le discriminatoire +n'est plus assumé, il est intégré dans un code. Le contrôle ne s'exerce +plus par l'injonction ou l'exclusion explicite : il s'effectue par +*l'écrémage algorithmique*, par la modulation silencieuse des +trajectoires sociales à travers des variables statistiques. + +Ce qui est à l'œuvre dans tous ces dispositifs, c'est un renversement +profond de l'économie politique du pouvoir : le sujet n'est plus soumis +au droit, il est ajusté au calcul. L'anticipation algorithmique produit +une nouvelle forme d'archicration, non plus centralisée, visible et +contestable, mais fragmentée, fluide, insaisissable — oblitérée dans +les profondeurs techniques des systèmes d'information. Et c'est +précisément cette oblitération du moment régulateur qui constitue le +défi majeur pour la pensée critique contemporaine : comment repolitiser +ce qui a été délibérément rendu a-politique par le design technique ? +Comment rendre à nouveau visible, discutable, négociable une régulation +sans scène, sans logos, sans conflictualité apparente ? + +Ce que révèle l'analyse de la cratialité anticipatoire, dans toute son +épaisseur technopolitique et son ambivalence normative, c'est la mue +profonde d'un régime de pouvoir qui ne s'exerce plus par l'acte visible +d'autorité ni par l'affrontement conflictuel sur une scène instituée, +mais par une modulation probabiliste des trajectoires humaines à travers +des architectures techniques de captation, de calcul et de prescription. +Il ne s'agit plus d'imposer, ni même d'interdire : il s'agit de prévoir, +d'orienter, de préfigurer, de rendre probable certains comportements +plutôt que d'autres, par le biais de dispositifs intelligents dont +l'efficacité est directement proportionnelle à leur invisibilité. Le +pouvoir devient moins coercitif que directionnel : il agit par gradients +d'influence plutôt que par sommations explicites. C'est là le cœur du +basculement cratial qui caractérise la quatrième révolution +industrielle. + +Cette mutation n'est pas un simple prolongement de la rationalisation +opérée dans les régimes précédents. Elle constitue un saut qualitatif, +une transformation de la nature même de l'acte de régulation. La +*cratialité anticipatoire* n'est ni disciplinaire ni décisionnelle ; +elle est *algorithmique*, *opératoire*, *préemptive*. Elle ne se +construit plus dans le cadre d'une dialectique entre sujet et norme, +mais dans une relation *sans énonciation*, où le pouvoir agit en +silence, par interpolation de patterns, par extraction de régularités +comportementales, par inscription dans des chaînes de corrélation. Il ne +s'agit pas de dire la norme, mais de l'exécuter sous la forme d'un code. +Ainsi, comme le montre brillamment Louise Amoore dans *Cloud Ethics* +(2020), l'anticipation algorithmique « ne se contente pas de prédire ce +que nous pourrions faire : elle reconfigure ce que nous sommes censés +pouvoir faire ». La prédiction devient prescription. L'ontologie du +possible est reprogrammée. + +Dans ce contexte, l'individu n'est plus seulement sujet d'un droit, ni +même objet d'un dispositif — il est *flux de données à moduler*, +*profil à prédire*, *signal à ajuster*. La *cratialité anticipatoire* +est donc un régime de pouvoir profondément post-discursif : elle +n'appelle ni adhésion, ni conflit, ni transgression. Elle opère par +*discrétisation* du réel, par *dislocation* du sujet, par *dissolution* +du politique. Elle met en œuvre ce que Rouvroy et Berns appellent une +*gouvernementalité algorithmique sans sujet* : une forme de gouvernement +qui, au lieu de passer par des représentations, des lois, des discours, +agit directement sur les conditions d'apparition des comportements, via +des dispositifs techniques auto-apprenants, connectés, rétroactifs. La +logique du feedback remplace la logique du contrat ; la logique de la +probabilité évince celle de la responsabilité. + +Mais cette régulation par anticipation, aussi sophistiquée soit-elle, +n'est pas sans contrepartie. Car à mesure qu'elle gagne en efficacité +prédictive, elle se heurte à sa propre limite structurelle : le vivant, +le social, le conflictuel ne se laissent pas totalement anticiper. Il +demeure toujours un résidu, un écart, une fuite — ce que nous +pourrions appeler, en écho à Georges Canguilhem, une normativité +rebelle, une part de subjectivité irréductible qui résiste à +l'assignation algorithmique. Cette résistance ne prend pas +nécessairement la forme d'un affrontement frontal ; elle peut se +déployer comme bruit, comme chaos, comme imprévisibilité radicale. C'est +précisément ce que les régimes prédictifs tentent de neutraliser — mais qu'ils échouent à éradiquer complètement, car le réel est +irréductible à ses modèles. + +Enfin, cette forme de cratialité marque également une étape critique +dans notre conceptualisation générale de l'*archicration*. Car elle +montre que l'archicration peut s'effacer tout en conservant sa puissance +: elle devient une régulation *sans scène*, un pouvoir *sans garant*, +une organisation du monde *sans énoncé fondateur*. Ce n'est plus le roi +qui parle, ni le législateur qui tranche, ni même l'ingénieur qui +planifie : c'est la machine qui calibre, l'algorithme qui oriente, +l'interface qui sélectionne. La scène archicratique se trouve ainsi +oblitérée, dispersée dans un ensemble de calculs sans visage. L'épreuve +du commun, qui faisait encore de la régulation un enjeu politique, +devient imperceptible. C'est cette disparition de la scène régulatoire +qui ouvre la voie à notre prochaine section : celle d'un régime +oblitéré, pouvoir sans lieu clairement assignable, sans sujet +identifiable et sans contradiction apparente, mais aux effets d'autant +plus profonds. + +### 4.5.3 — *Archicration oblitérée* : régulation sans scène, automatisation des normes, effacement du conflit, dissimulation de l'épreuve et des preuves + +Ce qui s'accomplit dans les régimes contemporains de pouvoir — à +l'intersection de l'infrastructure numérique planétaire, de la +prédiction algorithmique, et de la captation attentionnelle — relève +d'une inflexion historique capitale de l'archicration. Non plus son +déploiement visible et instituant, comme dans ses formes classiques ou +cybernétiques, mais son oblitération : son effacement comme scène +identifiable de régulation et sa dissémination dans les flux techniques +et les automatismes socio-algorithmiques. Ce n'est plus seulement que la +régulation se fait sans visage : c'est qu'elle se fait *hors scène*, +*hors sujet*, *hors preuve* — dans un régime quasi spectral du +pouvoir, où la norme opère sans être nommée, où le conflit est absorbé +avant même d'apparaître, et où l'épreuve régulatoire, en tant que moment +de visibilité, d'opposition, voire de scandale, est structurellement +neutralisée. + +L'enjeu est ici fondamental pour notre essai-thèse sur l'archicratie : +nous assistons à une mutation dans la *possibilité même d'un régime +archicratique identifiable*. Là où les régulations antérieures, même +dans leurs formes les plus totalisantes ou disciplinantes, laissaient +subsister une scène — un lieu, une instance, un conflit, une +juridiction, une modalité de l'interpellation — la configuration +contemporaine produit un monde dans lequel la régulation devient +*désincarnée, difficile à référer et de moins en moins rapportable à une +scène identifiable*. Elle ne convoque plus le sujet — ni pour +l'assujettir, ni même pour le responsabiliser — mais l'évalue, le +profile, le module, le trie, sans jamais se rendre visible à lui. Elle +ne fonde plus ses interventions sur un *ordre juridique*, une *norme +énoncée* ou une *valeur explicite*, mais sur un *fonctionnement +optimisé*, sur des *corrélations statistiques* et sur des *systèmes +d'alerte automatisés*. Ainsi se dessine une archicration oblitérée, +c'est-à-dire une régulation qui ne se donne plus comme telle : elle +opère sans se dire, sans s'assumer pleinement, sans apparaître. + +Ce basculement n'est pas une simple inflexion technique ; il engage un +tournant épistémologique, un effondrement de la réflexivité régulatoire +et, en dernière instance, une dissolution du politique en tant que scène +du commun régulé. L'effacement du conflit n'est pas l'avènement de la +paix, mais la mise hors-jeu du dissensus. La disparition de la preuve +n'est pas la fin de l'enquête, mais l'impossibilité de l'objectivation. +Et l'automatisation des normes n'est pas leur perfection, mais leur +soustraction à toute forme de responsabilité instituante. + +Dans cette section, nous analyserons donc rigoureusement, à la lumière +de notre cadre théorique triptyque (arcalité, cratialité, archicration), +les mécanismes à travers lesquels la régulation contemporaine *efface sa +propre scène*. Nous montrerons comment les infrastructures de traitement +automatisé, la logique de l'efficience prédictive, et la dépolitisation +active des normes conduisent à un régime où la puissance ne s'assume +plus comme telle, mais s'implante dans les conditions mêmes du réel. +Nous explorerons notamment l'effacement de l'épreuve (au sens où plus +rien n'est publiquement mis en question), et la dissimulation des +preuves (au sens où les décisions régulatoires ne laissent plus de trace +falsifiable, ni de justification intelligible). C'est ce que nous +nommerons ici l'oblitération archicratique : non pas la fin de la +régulation, mais la fin de sa visibilité, de son opposabilité, et de sa +responsabilité. + +Ce qui caractérise le régime de régulation propre à la phase +contemporaine de l'archicratie — ici qualifiée d'*oblitérée* — c'est +une double disjonction : d'une part, la dissociation entre norme et +visibilité, et d'autre part, la disparition du dissensus comme scène +critique de l'expérience collective. Autrement dit, nous entrons dans +une phase où *la régulation opère sans apparaître*, où *le pouvoir agit +sans s'exhiber*, et où *la contrainte se réalise sans mise à l'épreuve*. +Il ne s'agit plus ici d'un pouvoir qui impose, qui discipline, ou même +qui séduit : il s'agit d'un pouvoir qui n'apparaît plus comme tel, d'un +gouvernement dissous dans la gouvernance, d'un ordre dont l'autorité se +rend de moins en moins assignable. Ce paradoxe est au cœur de +l'hypothèse archicratique : ce n'est pas la régulation qui a disparu, +mais bien *la scène régulatoire* elle-même, c'est-à-dire ce lieu +symbolique, matériel, politique, dans lequel le pouvoir assume sa +fonction, l'expose, la justifie, et s'ouvre à la contestation. + +Dans les régimes régulateurs classiques, même dans les formes les plus +brutales — disciplinaires, policières, militaires, totalitaires — l'existence d'un *lieu du pouvoir*, d'un *centre de décision*, d'un +*discours normatif*, demeurait repérable, contestable, opposable. +L'école avait son maître, la loi son tribunal, l'usine son contremaître, +l'armée son commandement, l'État son administration. Même l'autorité la +plus illégitime demeurait localisable. Mais dans les régimes +contemporains d'archicration oblitérée, la régulation passe par *des +chaînes d'automates décisionnels*, *des logiques d'optimisation +invisibilisées*, *des architectures techniques à la fois opaques et +fluides*, *si bien que le pouvoir tend à devenir ambiant*. Il ne tranche +plus, il *paramètre*. Il ne juge plus, il *score*. Et surtout : +l'efficience du fonctionnement tient lieu de justification. + +Cette oblitération de la scène régulatoire se traduit, sur le plan +politique, par une atonie du dissensus. Non pas parce que les inégalités +ou les violences structurelles auraient disparu — au contraire, elles +prolifèrent — mais parce qu'elles sont *décontextualisées*, +*dé-indexées*, *dépoliticisées*. Le travailleur ubérisé, l'étudiant noté +par algorithme, le migrant fiché par IA, le citoyen géolocalisé et +profilé n'ont plus d'instance vers laquelle faire remonter leur plainte. +Ils ne sont plus *interpellés* au sens politique du terme, comme sujet +pouvant répondre. Ils sont *captés* comme source de signal. Leur +subjectivité est dissoute dans un flux de données. Et le dissensus n'a +plus de lieu, car il n'a plus d'objet identifiable : qui protester +contre un coefficient opaque ? qui mettre en accusation quand le +processus est réparti entre des dizaines de couches techniques, de +micro-décisions automatisées, d'algorithmes propriétaires ? + +La conséquence en est radicale : le conflit ne disparaît pas, il est +neutralisé en amont, intégré aux procédures et requalifié comme bruit +dans la matrice. L'épreuve n'a plus lieu. La règle ne se négocie plus. +La norme n'est plus énoncée, elle est codée. Il y a là une mutation +profonde dans le régime même de l'archicration : on ne régule plus en +dialoguant avec les sujets, mais en les contournant, en les +prédéfinissant, en réduisant leur capacité d'intervention dans l'épreuve +régulatoire. Il ne s'agit même plus de les faire taire, mais de ne plus +leur adresser la parole. Le dissensus est disqualifié non comme erreur, +mais comme *perturbation logique*. Et la régulation devient *lissage*, +*filtrage*, *optimisation*, au mépris de toute conflictualité +fondatrice. + +C'est ici que l'on comprend que l'archicration oblitérée constitue une +phase critique dans l'histoire des formes régulatoires : non pas parce +qu'elle serait particulièrement autoritaire ou brutale (même si elle +peut l'être), mais parce qu'elle dissout *la condition même de la +régulation*, à savoir la scène. Il n'y a plus de scène, parce qu'il n'y +a plus de reconnaissance mutuelle entre les termes du pouvoir. Il n'y a +plus de mise en forme du commun, mais seulement une logique de +traitement. Il n'y a plus de société régulée — il y a une série de +données modélisées et simulées. + +Dans le régime d'archicration oblitérée, la norme ne disparaît pas — elle s'efface. Plus précisément, elle cesse d'être formulée en tant que +*norme* pour devenir *procédure*, *fonction*, *critère implicite*, +*protocole incrémental*. Ce que nous avions encore la possibilité de +désigner dans les précédents régimes — règle, loi, décret, contrat, +protocole de négociation — devient ici pure performance d'un système, +dont la normativité est dissoute dans l'itération technique. La norme +n'est plus énoncée ; elle est implémentée. C'est ce qui la rend plus +difficile à contester : ce que l'on ne peut ni nommer clairement ni +situer ne s'assigne plus aisément à responsabilité. Ce qui ne se +présente plus comme norme, mais comme automatisme fonctionnel, cesse +d'être perçu comme relevant du politique — alors même qu'il en est +aujourd'hui le cœur. + +Ce phénomène se radicalise dans les architectures régulatoires dites « +intelligentes », où les modalités de traitement des situations ne sont +plus décidées en amont, mais calculées en temps réel à partir d'un passé +de données. L'intelligence artificielle, en particulier dans ses formes +apprenantes (machine learning, deep learning), produit une régulation +sans règle préalable, sans cadre de délibération, sans justification. +Elle ne décide pas à partir de principes, mais d'historicités +statistiques. Elle ne juge pas : elle *prévoit*, *compare*, *classe*, +*ajuste*. C'est l'aboutissement d'un processus que Michel Callon avait +déjà entrevu dans ses travaux sur l'économie des agencements (Callon, +*L'emprise des marchés*, 2007) : les décisions ne sont plus prises *par* +des sujets, mais *dans* des dispositifs, par circulation, agencement, +rétroaction de signaux. Et ce que ces dispositifs oblitèrent n'est pas +seulement le débat politique, mais *la condition même de la +vérification* : la *preuve*. + +L'un des signes les plus inquiétants de cette mutation tient précisément +à cette disparition de la preuve comme opérateur de vérité et de droit. +Dans les régimes précédents, toute décision, même injuste, devait en +principe être *justifiable* : c'est-à-dire exposée, motivée, opposable. +Le droit, même dans ses formes les plus inégalitaires, organisait une +scène d'argumentation, une possibilité de recours, une exigence de +démonstration. Dans les régimes algorithmisés contemporains, cette scène +est effacée. Le score qui attribue un crédit, qui sélectionne un profil, +qui déclenche une alerte, qui attribue une note de confiance, n'est plus +*expliqué* : il est *exécuté*. Et cette exécution sans justification +installe un pouvoir sans preuve — c'est-à-dire, pour reprendre la +formule de Jacques Rancière dans *La haine de la démocratie* (2005), un +pouvoir sans compte à rendre, sans logos, sans dissensus possible. + +Dans l'univers des plateformes, cette disparition de la preuve est +institutionnalisée. Les sanctions algorithmiques (désactivation d'un +compte, déréférencement, bannissement, assignation de statut, shadowban) +sont mises en œuvre sans notification, sans procédure contradictoire, +sans possibilité d'appel. Le pouvoir devient l'effet silencieux d'un +code inaccessible. Comme l'a montré Frank Pasquale dans *The Black Box +Society* (2015), cette logique de la boîte noire institutionnalise +l'asymétrie radicale entre les producteurs de normes et les sujets +régulés : seuls les premiers ont accès aux critères ; les seconds en +subissent les effets sans en connaître les causes. La régulation se fait +sans scène, sans exposé, sans responsabilité explicite. Elle se contente +de *fonctionner*. + +Or cet effacement de la preuve — de la possibilité même de produire +une démonstration, une explication, une contradiction — est peut-être +le symptôme le plus radical de l'archicration oblitérée : elle signe la +fin de l'épreuve comme modalité centrale de la régulation. Le conflit +n'est pas réprimé : il est *inexprimable*. La règle n'est pas +autoritaire : elle est *inexpliquée*. Le pouvoir n'est pas visible : il +est *calculé*. Il n'y a plus de théâtre du droit, plus de scène du +politique, plus de tension entre normativité et subjectivation. Tend +alors à ne subsister qu'un ajustement en continu du système à ses +propres critères internes. Et cette régulation opaque, dépourvue de +justification publique, tend vers une régulation sans extériorité +lisible, c'est-à-dire une forme de pouvoir sans exposition et sans +altérité — un pouvoir qui rencontre de moins en moins l'autre : ni +l'autre voix, ni l'autre preuve, ni l'autre monde. + +Ce que cette oblitération de la scène archicrative détruit +silencieusement, ne se limite pas à la possibilité, pour une parole +située, d'instituer le monde : c'est la place même d'où cette parole +pouvait le faire. À mesure que la régulation migre des institutions vers +les infrastructures, des lois vers les scripts, des délibérations vers +les traitements automatiques, ce n'est pas uniquement le cadre du droit +ou le rôle de l'État qui se décomposent, mais le théâtre où le pouvoir +pouvait être nommé, désigné, contesté. Le politique, en tant qu'épreuve +du commun, se trouve peu à peu remplacé par une administration du +probable : le monde n'est plus institué par des paroles en conflit ; il +est modulé par des dispositifs qui ajustent en continu ce qu'il est +possible de voir, de faire et de devenir. + +La scène du pouvoir, historiquement liée à sa *visibilité* (Foucault, +*Surveiller et punir*, 1975), s'efface donc dans un régime où ce qui +compte n'est plus ce qui est montré, mais ce qui *fonctionne*. +L'efficience remplace la légitimité ; la performance supplante la +représentation. L'espace du désaccord — central dans toute régulation +démocratique, précisément parce qu'il fonde la légitimité sur la +pluralité des perspectives — est remplacé par un espace de préemption. +Le dissensus n'est plus combattu ni réprimé : il est *rendu impossible* +par la structure même du dispositif. C'est là, comme le remarque +Grégoire Chamayou dans *La société ingouvernable* (2018), l'un des +traits les plus caractéristiques des rationalités néolibérales tardives +: neutraliser le politique en le recodant comme un problème +d'ingénierie, de gestion du risque, de modélisation du comportement. + +Dans ce cadre, les subjectivités ne sont plus adressées comme +*citoyennes*, c'est-à-dire capables de parole, de protestation, de +jugement, mais comme *vecteurs de données*, *entités prédictibles*, +*flux de comportements à anticiper*. La politique de la reconnaissance +cède la place à une politique de l'indexation. Ce que l'on appelle +parfois « gouvernementalité numérique » est donc moins un style de +gouvernance qu'un déplacement ontologique : les êtres humains ne sont +plus traités comme des sujets, mais comme des motifs comportementaux ; +leurs actions ne sont plus évaluées mais *corrélées* ; leurs existences +ne sont plus situées mais *scorées*. + +Et dans cette dé-subjectivation radicale, la question de la +*responsabilité* se dissout. Qui gouverne dans un monde où les décisions +sont prises par des chaînes algorithmiques, où les effets sont produits +par des corrélations statistiques, où les actions sont motivées par +l'opacité de modèles auto-ajustables ? Qui est responsable d'un refus +automatique de crédit, d'un bannissement de plateforme, d'un classement +discriminatoire ? Où s'exerce la souveraineté, quand la norme n'est plus +que l'output d'un processus sans garant ? Cette architecture produit une +fragmentation de la responsabilité, une dispersion des actes de pouvoir +et une opacification de l'intentionnalité. + +Ce mouvement est parfaitement analysé par Elena Esposito dans +*Artificial Communication* (2022), où elle montre que les systèmes de +traitement algorithmique produisent des décisions *sans décisionnaire*, +des communications *sans énonciateur*, des interactions *sans sujet*. +L'archicration oblitérée est ainsi la forme d'un pouvoir qui n'a plus de +lieu, plus de nom, plus de scène. Un pouvoir qui tend à ne plus se +présenter comme tel, mais qui s'exerce de manière diffuse dans +l'automaticité de l'environnement. + +Ce pouvoir, précisément parce qu'il est sans visage, sans adresse, sans +exposition, rend impossible le retour critique. Il n'est plus possible +de s'opposer à une norme si celle-ci ne se présente jamais comme norme. +Il n'est plus possible de disputer une règle si celle-ci n'est jamais +formulée. Il n'est plus possible de désigner un adversaire si celui-ci +est un protocole, un réseau, un programme. L'archicration oblitérée +dissout ainsi *la possibilité même de l'épreuve* — c'est-à-dire la +capacité pour un sujet de faire apparaître un désaccord, de le mettre en +scène, de l'exiger comme tel. + +En ce sens, nous ne sommes plus dans un monde d'injustice visible, mais +dans un monde d'injusticiabilité structurelle. Un monde où la plainte +n'a plus de destinataire, où le conflit n'a plus de scène, où la preuve +est rendue inutile par le fonctionnement. C'est là l'un des tournants +les plus décisifs de notre époque : un pouvoir sans sujet, une norme +sans texte, un ordre sans discours — et par conséquent, une régulation +sans régulateur, sans contestation, sans réflexivité. Un ordre qui n'a +plus besoin de se dire, parce qu'il s'impose dans la forme même de +l'interface. + +Ce que révèle avec une acuité implacable l'analyse de l'archicration +oblitérée, c'est le basculement d'un paradigme régulatoire fondé sur la +conflictualité visible, sur la médiation politique, sur l'exposition des +normes à la critique, vers un régime opaque, automatisé, +post-délibératif, dans lequel la scène de la régulation elle-même s'est +évaporée. Il ne s'agit plus de gouverner par commandement, ni même par +contrat : il s'agit de *pré-conditionner l'espace des possibles*, +d'*inscrire dans les architectures techniques les normes opératoires*, +et de *rendre obsolète toute possibilité d'épreuve partagée*. + +En ce sens, l'archicration contemporaine ne se présente plus comme un +processus dialectique entre autorité, légitimation et critique, mais +comme une *programmation silencieuse* du monde social. Ce que nous avons +nommé *oblitération*, en un sens pleinement phénoménologique et +politique, désigne ce processus de disparition simultanée de la scène, +du sujet, du dissensus et de la preuve — c'est-à-dire de tout ce qui +rend possible la régulation en tant qu'espace institué de conflits +réglés, de confrontations arbitrables, de normes négociables. + +Dans cette oblitération, la cratialité — puissance de configuration — devient insaisissable : elle ne s'énonce plus, elle s'injecte dans +les dispositifs. L'arcalité — structuration du pensable — devient +silencieuse : elle n'impose plus de formes visibles, elle module des +environnements d'action. Et l'archicration elle-même, c'est-à-dire la +régulation comme scène du pouvoir en tension, s'efface dans +l'automatisme des systèmes et l'invisibilité de leurs logiques +opératoires. + +Mais cet effacement ne signifie pas disparition du pouvoir : bien au +contraire, c'est *le moment où il devient total*, précisément parce +qu'il ne se confronte plus à aucune épreuve de légitimation. C'est là +l'aporie de la régulation contemporaine : plus elle se veut objective, +technique, efficiente, plus elle évacue les conditions mêmes de sa +remise en cause, c'est-à-dire sa propre historicité, sa contingence, sa +normativité. Elle tend à fonctionner sans plus exposer suffisamment sa +propre normativité. + +Le prix de cette efficacité oblitérante, c'est la dissolution du +politique — non comme idéologie, mais comme capacité de *reconfigurer +le commun*. Et cette dissolution, comme nous allons le voir dans la +section suivante, ouvre soit à l'acceptation passive d'un ordre sans +alternative, soit à la réinvention d'une nouvelle scène archicratique. +Une scène qui, pour exister, devra restituer l'épreuve, repolitiser les +normes et refonder la régulation sur l'explicitation des conflits et des +valeurs. C'est cette bifurcation, entre permanence de l'effacement et +réactivation instituante de la scène, qui fera l'enjeu décisif de la +transition vers la cinquième révolution régulatoire. + +### **4.5.4 — Trois figures emblématiques de l'*archicration oblitérée* : crédit social, *nudge*, plateformes** + +Il faut d'abord déconstruire les lectures superficielles du système de +crédit social chinois, souvent réduit, dans l'imaginaire occidental, à +une dystopie orwellienne, sans examen sérieux de ses fondements +structurels ni de ses implications archicratiques. Car ce système ne se +contente pas de punir ou récompenser des citoyens en fonction d'un score — il reconfigure entièrement la régulation sociale par la +désintermédiation normative. Le crédit social — tel que mis en œuvre +depuis les premiers pilotes régionaux en 2009, puis dans sa +généralisation planifiée par le document-cadre de 2014 intitulé +*Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System —* se +déploie en dispositif englobant d'encodage des comportements selon une +grammaire algorithmique et situationnelle, appuyée sur un maillage +sociotechnique d'acteurs publics et privés. + +Ce système ne repose pas uniquement sur une centralisation totalitaire +mais bien sur une architecture distribuée, où différentes municipalités, +agences gouvernementales et entreprises collaborent pour établir, +pondérer et appliquer des *scores* en fonction d'une multiplicité de +données — paiements de dettes, incivilités, déplacements, +comportements en ligne, interactions sociales, habitudes de +consommation, etc. C'est cette granularité modulaire et cette +hybridation des sphères de vie qui en fait une forme d'archicration +radicalement oblitérée : les normes ne sont plus énoncées explicitement, +les sanctions ne sont plus publiques, les effets sont intégrés aux +dispositifs de manière silencieuse — refus de billet de train, +ralentissement administratif, exclusion algorithmique. La régulation ne +se voit plus, elle s'infiltre. + +En cela, le crédit social incarne une régulation sans scène, sans +procès, sans confrontation. Il n'y a pas de moment instituant du droit, +pas de conflit visible autour de la norme. L'épreuve régulatoire est +dissoute dans la mécanique des flux et des rétroactions. La puissance +régulatrice n'est plus exercée frontalement par l'État souverain, mais +injectée dans les dispositifs techniques, dans la banque, le téléphone, +la porte d'entrée, la borne de transport, la reconnaissance faciale. La +citoyenneté devient un statut dynamique, noté, conditionné, ajustable — une *subjectivation sous conditions métriques*, où chaque action est +pré-encadrée par une prédiction comportementale normée. + +Le cœur archicratique du dispositif réside ici dans cette anticipation +normalisatrice : on ne juge plus ce qui a été fait ; on module ce qui +pourrait advenir. C'est l'actualisation comportementale du régime de +gouvernementalité algorithmique décrit par Rouvroy et Berns (2013), où +le pouvoir opère sans normateur, sans loi, mais à partir des +corrélations inférées de l'observation statistique. L'ordre social n'est +plus garanti par un principe transcendantal ou contractuel, mais par la +conformité à des modèles de comportement calculés à partir des traces. +Ce système marque ainsi l'apogée de l'effacement de l'autorité comme +scène visible et du conflit comme moteur instituant. Le crédit social +s'inscrit dans une logique d'intériorisation algorithmique de la norme, +où l'individu est incité à *s'autogouverner* selon les critères d'une +rationalité prédictive. L'espace du conflit explicite se réduit +fortement : la norme tend à imprégner l'environnement. + +Enfin, cette archicration oblitérée se pare d'un discours de +*confiance*, de *morale civique*, et de *responsabilité collective*, +venant dissimuler son caractère disciplinaire. Le langage de la +bienveillance et de la transparence est utilisé pour légitimer une +ingénierie sociale totalisante. La norme devient un bien public, la +surveillance devient un service, et la conformité devient une vertu +civique. C'est là l'un des paradoxes majeurs de l'archicration moderne : +elle se naturalise dans l'infrastructure même de la vie sociale, et se +rend méconnaissable comme pouvoir. Le crédit social n'est donc pas une +exception autoritaire : il est une forme extrême et paradigmatique d'un +régime de régulation post-disciplinaire, où la scène, le garant et la +contre-épreuve tendent à s'effacer. En ce sens, il constitue le miroir +grossissant de la gouvernementalité algorithmique mondialisée, bien +au-delà de la Chine. + +Si le système chinois de crédit social incarne l'un des sommets +contemporains de l'archicration oblitérée par la quantification +exhaustive et le pilotage panoptique des conduites, il n'en représente +pourtant qu'une des modalités, de type principalement étatique et +centralisé. Mais l'effacement de l'épreuve régulatrice, dans la +contemporanéité occidentale comme dans la sphère globale, ne passe pas +toujours par la monumentalité algorithmique ni par le paradigme du score +intégral. Il opère aussi — et peut-être plus insidieusement encore — à travers des formes douces, latérales, modulantes, où la contrainte se +dissimule sous les traits de la suggestion. Le pouvoir ne se manifeste +plus par l'énoncé d'un seuil ou la menace d'une sanction, mais par +l'agencement silencieux des conditions d'adhésion. Là où le crédit +social trace une ligne entre ce qui est permis et ce qui est exclu, le +*nudge* reconfigure l'environnement pour rendre une option plus +probable, plus désirable, plus commode. C'est à ce seuil que s'ouvre une +autre figure emblématique de l'archicration oblitérée : *la régulation +comportementale par l'architecture du choix*. + +Le *nudge* n'est pas une simple méthode de persuasion : il est +l'expression emblématique d'un tournant fondamental dans la manière +contemporaine de penser l'exercice du pouvoir. Élaboré et popularisé par +Richard Thaler et Cass Sunstein dans leur ouvrage fondateur *Nudge: +Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness* (2008), le +nudge se donne pour objectif d'*orienter les comportements individuels +sans coercition*, en agissant sur les « architectures du choix ». Il ne +s'agit plus de prescrire, d'interdire ou d'imposer, mais d'organiser +l'environnement décisionnel de manière à *influencer implicitement* la +conduite des sujets. + +Or ce déplacement est absolument crucial dans le contexte de notre thèse +sur l'archicration oblitérée. Car le *nudge* opère non seulement un +*effacement du normateur* — plus de loi identifiable, plus d'autorité +explicite — mais aussi une *dissimulation complète du dissensus*. Le +sujet n'est plus interpellé par une règle ou confronté à une alternative +explicitement conflictuelle. Il est doucement dirigé vers la « bonne » +décision, selon des critères qui ne sont jamais mis en débat, mais +naturalisés dans la forme même de la situation. On ne dit pas : « Tu +dois faire cela. » On crée une situation telle que, *statistiquement*, « +tu feras cela ». L'autorité devient invisible, mais d'autant plus +opérante. + +Le *nudge* repose sur des modélisations issues des sciences +comportementales, en particulier de la *behavioral economics* et de la +*psychologie cognitive*. Il instrumentalise les biais cognitifs, comme +l'aversion à la perte, l'effet de cadrage, le biais de statu quo, pour +produire des effets comportementaux sans passage par la conscience +réflexive. En cela, il constitue une régulation qui contourne largement +la délibération réflexive, pour reprendre les termes de Dan Ariely +(*Predictably Irrational*, 2008). Le nudge ne vise pas à convaincre ou à +délibérer, mais à *court-circuiter la décision par l'architecture*. + +Ce type de régulation tend à neutraliser la dimension archicratique +comme scène visible, tout en conservant une forte effectivité +régulatrice. Il exerce une force réelle sur le comportement, sans que +cette force ne soit repérable comme telle. La puissance de contrainte +est déplacée dans l'environnement. Le pouvoir n'est plus ce qui +interdit, mais ce qui configure. Et cette configuration repose sur une +*asymétrie radicale de savoir* : seuls ceux qui conçoivent les +environnements de choix connaissent les effets du dispositif. Le +citoyen, le patient, l'usager, l'élève, le travailleur sont devenus des +cibles statistiques, modélisables et ajustables, selon les modalités de +ce que Sunstein nomme *paternalisme libertarien* — oxymore révélateur +s'il en est. La liberté est conservée *formellement*, mais elle est +régulée *structurellement*. Ce n'est plus une liberté politique, mais +une liberté calibrée. + +L'*archicration oblitérée* atteint ici une forme particulièrement +insidieuse : le *nudge* ne se contente pas de produire de l'obéissance, +il produit de l'adhésion implicite. Il tend à réduire l'espace du +conflit et à rendre plus improbable le moment explicite de la +désobéissance. Car désobéir à quoi, si la norme n'est plus énoncée ? +Comment contester un dispositif qui se contente d'organiser la +présentation des options ? Le sujet est enserré dans une régulation sans +scène, sans codification, sans interlocuteur. Ce que produit le nudge, +c'est l'*effacement de l'épreuve normative*, au profit d'une *mécanique +d'adoption prévisible*. + +De plus, le nudge trouve sa pleine efficacité dans les environnements +numérisés, les interfaces logicielles, les parcours utilisateurs +algorithmisés. Il s'intègre parfaitement aux logiques de *design +comportemental*, où l'interface devient elle-même l'opérateur régulateur +: options par défaut, notifications, feedbacks instantanés, +personnalisation adaptative. Le *choice architecture* devient *interface +architecture*. En cela, le nudge s'insère directement dans le +prolongement des régimes cybernétiques décrits précédemment : +*rétroaction douce*, *pilotage implicite*, *auto-modulation +comportementale*. + +Mais ce modèle de régulation soulève une contradiction fondamentale : à +mesure que le pouvoir se rend invisible, il devient *irréfutable*. Le +nudge n'est pas une norme discutable, c'est une situation. Et comme +l'ont souligné critiques et philosophes (notamment Evgeny Morozov dans +*To Save Everything, Click Here*, 2013), ce déplacement de la norme vers +la technique produit un effet d'irresponsabilité généralisée. Si +personne ne prescrit, qui peut être contesté ? Si personne n'ordonne, +qui peut être tenu pour responsable ? Le nudge n'abolit pas formellement +la liberté ; il tend à en reconfigurer techniquement les conditions +d'exercice. + +Ainsi, le nudge s'impose comme une *figure paradigmatique de +l'archicration oblitérée* : une régulation sans conflit, sans loi, sans +sujet, mais d'une efficacité normative redoutable. Il incarne le +basculement contemporain de l'autorité vers l'environnement, du +commandement vers l'interface, de la loi vers la disposition. Il est la +forme douce d'un pouvoir qui ne se nomme plus comme tel, mais règle, +module, ajuste et anticipe. Il est l'invisibilisation politique de la +régulation. + +Mais cette gouvernance par la disposition douce et la modulation +prévisible n'est elle-même que l'un des visages d'un basculement plus +vaste encore : celui par lequel la scène de régulation se trouve +*entièrement absorbée* par l'infrastructure même de l'environnement +numérique. Car si le *nudge* opère dans des configurations locales, +ponctuelles, situationnelles, les *plateformes numériques*, elles, +déploient un *régime total* de structuration de l'action, du discours, +de la visibilité et de la valeur. Elles ne se contentent pas de suggérer — elles *configurent l'accès au réel*. Elles ne proposent pas une +orientation discrète — elles *inscrivent les normes dans les logiques +d'interaction, les protocoles de publication, les métriques +d'évaluation*. C'est dans cet horizon que l'archicration oblitérée +atteint son seuil critique : celui d'un *pouvoir algorithmique sans +dehors*, où toute épreuve est internalisée dans les règles d'un système +sans sujet, sans scène et sans garant. C'est cette figure — la +plateforme comme forme avancée d'archicration — qu'il nous faut +maintenant analyser. + +L'apparition et la généralisation des plateformes numériques constituent +l'une des mutations majeures de la régulation moderne. Non pas parce +qu'elles introduiraient un nouvel acteur du pouvoir (elles ne sont ni +État, ni marché au sens traditionnel), ni même parce qu'elles +modifieraient seulement les modalités techniques de l'intermédiation +sociale, mais parce qu'elles redéfinissent *ontologiquement* la scène +même sur laquelle toute régulation devient possible. Les plateformes — Uber, Amazon, Facebook/Meta, Google, TikTok, Airbnb, etc. — sont +devenues, en moins de deux décennies, des formes englobantes +d'organisation des pratiques humaines, où visibilité, valeur, +circulation et reconnaissance sociale sont de plus en plus conditionnées +par des logiques d'inscription algorithmique. + +Ce que nous désignons ici comme archicration oblitérée trouve dans ces +dispositifs une forme pleinement opératoire : la régulation n'est plus +énoncée, elle est *programmée* ; elle n'est plus débattue, elle est +*codée* ; elle ne résulte plus d'un processus de légitimation sociale, +mais d'une ingénierie continue des interactions. L'usager n'est plus +confronté à une règle extérieure qu'il pourrait contester, négocier, +transgresser : il est *pris dans la maille d'un système auto-régulé*, +qui encode à chaque instant les conditions de son action, les critères +de son évaluation, la logique de son classement. Et ce sans qu'aucune +scène publique, aucun espace de conflit ou de désaccord explicite ne +soit véritablement constitué. *Le pouvoir ne gouverne plus à partir du +sommet : il circule dans les interfaces.* Ce dispositif repose sur trois principes étroitement articulés : -L’architecture algorithmique comme cadre régulateur premier. À la manière dont l’urbanisme conditionne la marche, le plan des interfaces conditionne la navigation, le choix, l’expression. Le design des plateformes, tel que théorisé par Ben Schneiderman ou Donald Norman, n’est pas neutre : il opère comme *technologie de l’agencement*. En déterminant ce qui est visible, accessible, mis en avant ou dissimulé, il configure *l’épreuve même de l’existence sociale*. Comme l’écrit Safiya Umoja Noble dans *Algorithms of Oppression* (2018), les logiques de classement et de suggestion automatisées par les moteurs de recherche ou les plateformes de streaming reproduisent et accentuent des biais historiques — raciaux, genrés, économiques — tout en dissimulant leur origine sous l’apparence d’une neutralité computationnelle. Le classement est déjà jugement, et le jugement sans visage est la forme la plus silencieuse de la domination. +L'architecture algorithmique comme cadre régulateur premier. À la +manière dont l'urbanisme conditionne la marche, le plan des interfaces +conditionne la navigation, le choix, l'expression. Le design des +plateformes, tel que théorisé par Ben Schneiderman ou Donald Norman, +n'est pas neutre : il opère comme *technologie de l'agencement*. En +déterminant ce qui est visible, accessible, mis en avant ou dissimulé, +il configure *l'épreuve même de l'existence sociale*. Comme l'écrit +Safiya Umoja Noble dans *Algorithms of Oppression* (2018), les logiques +de classement et de suggestion automatisées par les moteurs de recherche +ou les plateformes de streaming reproduisent et accentuent des biais +historiques — raciaux, genrés, économiques — tout en dissimulant +leur origine sous l'apparence d'une neutralité computationnelle. Le +classement est déjà jugement, et le jugement sans visage est la forme la +plus silencieuse de la domination. -La métrification intégrale de l’expérience comme moteur d’ajustement. Chaque geste, chaque clic, chaque délai de réaction, chaque hésitation devient une *donnée exploitée* en temps réel pour moduler la configuration des contenus, des prix, des propositions. L’archicration devient alors un *processus d’adaptation permanente*, dans lequel l’ajustement algorithmique remplace la norme. Comme le démontre Shoshana Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), le cœur économique de ces plateformes réside dans leur capacité à *prévoir et modeler les comportements futurs* à partir de la captation exhaustive des traces passées. L’algorithme ne réagit pas au monde : il *le façonne préemptivement*, orientant les conduites avant même qu’elles ne se formulent. Ainsi, la gouvernance devient pure modulation : pas de loi, mais une incitation personnalisée ; pas de sanction, mais une invisibilisation algorithmique ; pas d’ordre explicite, mais une configuration invisible des possibles. +La métrification intégrale de l'expérience comme moteur d'ajustement. +Chaque geste, chaque clic, chaque délai de réaction, chaque hésitation +devient une *donnée exploitée* en temps réel pour moduler la +configuration des contenus, des prix, des propositions. L'archicration +devient alors un *processus d'adaptation permanente*, dans lequel +l'ajustement algorithmique remplace la norme. Comme le démontre Shoshana +Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), le cœur +économique de ces plateformes réside dans leur capacité à *prévoir et +modeler les comportements futurs* à partir de la captation exhaustive +des traces passées. L'algorithme ne réagit pas au monde : il *le façonne +préemptivement*, orientant les conduites avant même qu'elles ne se +formulent. Ainsi, la gouvernance devient pure modulation : pas de loi, +mais une incitation personnalisée ; pas de sanction, mais une +invisibilisation algorithmique ; pas d'ordre explicite, mais une +configuration invisible des possibles. -L’effacement des médiations symboliques et politiques comme condition de l’oblitération. Les plateformes se présentent non comme des espaces politiques, mais comme des *services techniques*. Elles prétendent n’être que des interfaces neutres, des facilitateurs de mise en relation. Mais cette prétendue neutralité est l’instrument même de leur pouvoir : *en évacuant la question du commun, elles empêchent toute mise en débat des règles du jeu*. Ce que les plateformes réalisent, en ce sens, c’est la *désinstitutionnalisation radicale du conflit* : il n’y a plus de scène sur laquelle contester la règle, car la règle est dissoute dans le code. Ce que Félix Tréguer nomme, dans *L’Utopie déchue* (2019), « la privatisation des conditions d’exercice des libertés fondamentales » prend ici la forme d’une archicration paradoxale : celle d’un pouvoir sans législateur, sans débat, sans recours. +L'effacement des médiations symboliques et politiques comme condition de +l'oblitération. Les plateformes se présentent non comme des espaces +politiques, mais comme des *services techniques*. Elles prétendent +n'être que des interfaces neutres, des facilitateurs de mise en +relation. Mais cette prétendue neutralité est l'instrument même de leur +pouvoir : *en évacuant la question du commun, elles empêchent toute mise +en débat des règles du jeu*. Ce que les plateformes réalisent, en ce +sens, c'est la *désinstitutionnalisation radicale du conflit* : il n'y a +plus de scène sur laquelle contester la règle, car la règle est dissoute +dans le code. Ce que Félix Tréguer nomme, dans *L'Utopie déchue* (2019), +« la privatisation des conditions d'exercice des libertés fondamentales +» prend ici la forme d'une archicration paradoxale : celle d'un pouvoir +sans législateur, sans débat, sans recours. -En synthèse, les plateformes numériques incarnent un stade avancé où la scène archicrative est systématiquement oblitérée au profit d’une efficience normative à dominante cratiale : elles régulent sans gouverner, elles disciplinent sans énoncer, elles norment sans loi. Elles constituent des milieux techniques totalisants, dans lesquels les subjectivités sont *captées, modélisées, classées, rendues opératoires* selon des critères intégralement techniques. Leur pouvoir n’est ni politique au sens classique, ni strictement économique : il est *infra-politique*, *post-institutionnel*, *post-normatif*. Elles représentent ainsi l’une des formes les plus abouties — et les plus inquiétantes — de régulation sans scène, où la conflictualité n’est plus ni exprimée, ni représentée, ni même rendue possible. L’épreuve tend à être neutralisée, le dissensus prévenu, et la politique rabattue sur la fonctionnalité. C’est l’un des points les plus critiques du régime contemporain d’*archicration oblitérée*. +En synthèse, les plateformes numériques incarnent un stade avancé où la +scène archicrative est systématiquement oblitérée au profit d'une +efficience normative à dominante cratiale : elles régulent sans +gouverner, elles disciplinent sans énoncer, elles norment sans loi. +Elles constituent des milieux techniques totalisants, dans lesquels les +subjectivités sont *captées, modélisées, classées, rendues opératoires* +selon des critères intégralement techniques. Leur pouvoir n'est ni +politique au sens classique, ni strictement économique : il est +*infra-politique*, *post-institutionnel*, *post-normatif*. Elles +représentent ainsi l'une des formes les plus abouties — et les plus +inquiétantes — de régulation sans scène, où la conflictualité n'est +plus ni exprimée, ni représentée, ni même rendue possible. L'épreuve +tend à être neutralisée, le dissensus prévenu, et la politique rabattue +sur la fonctionnalité. C'est l'un des points les plus critiques du +régime contemporain d'*archicration oblitérée*. -Ce que révèlent, dans leur diversité apparente et leur cohérence profonde, les trois figures archicratiques examinées ici — *crédit social chinois*, *nudge comportemental* et *plateforme numérique* —, c’est le déploiement d’un nouveau régime de régulation dans lequel *le pouvoir n’est plus seulement une forme, ni même une force, mais une logique incorporée à l’infrastructure même du réel*. Ces dispositifs ne relèvent pas de simples anomalies périphériques : ils condensent un processus plus vaste de dématérialisation, de désincarnation et de dissimulation des mécanismes régulateurs. +Ce que révèlent, dans leur diversité apparente et leur cohérence +profonde, les trois figures archicratiques examinées ici — *crédit +social chinois*, *nudge comportemental* et *plateforme numérique* —, +c'est le déploiement d'un nouveau régime de régulation dans lequel *le +pouvoir n'est plus seulement une forme, ni même une force, mais une +logique incorporée à l'infrastructure même du réel*. Ces dispositifs ne +relèvent pas de simples anomalies périphériques : ils condensent un +processus plus vaste de dématérialisation, de désincarnation et de +dissimulation des mécanismes régulateurs. -Le crédit social chinois, dans sa version centralisée ou distribuée, manifeste la capacité d’un État à fusionner données administratives, historiques de comportements, réseaux sociaux, interactions numériques et systèmes de récompense/sanction en un *modèle total de régulation par anticipation*. Il représente une forme exemplaire — mais non exclusive — de gouvernement algorithmique à forte composante autoritaire, où l’algorithme devient *instrument de hiérarchisation sociale intégrée*. Mais ce que cette figure rend visible, ce n’est pas seulement une particularité « chinoise » : c’est *l’horizon potentiel de toute société algorithmisée* dans laquelle la valeur de l’individu est définie en temps réel par sa compatibilité comportementale avec les attentes du système. +Le crédit social chinois, dans sa version centralisée ou distribuée, +manifeste la capacité d'un État à fusionner données administratives, +historiques de comportements, réseaux sociaux, interactions numériques +et systèmes de récompense/sanction en un *modèle total de régulation par +anticipation*. Il représente une forme exemplaire — mais non exclusive — de gouvernement algorithmique à forte composante autoritaire, où +l'algorithme devient *instrument de hiérarchisation sociale intégrée*. +Mais ce que cette figure rend visible, ce n'est pas seulement une +particularité « chinoise » : c'est *l'horizon potentiel de toute société +algorithmisée* dans laquelle la valeur de l'individu est définie en +temps réel par sa compatibilité comportementale avec les attentes du +système. -Le *nudge*, en tant qu’ingénierie douce du comportement, opère à un autre niveau : il *remplace la loi par la suggestion*, *le commandement par la courbe de probabilité*. Né de l’économie comportementale (Thaler & Sunstein, *Nudge*, 2008), il incarne une rationalité post-normative, où l’on ne cherche plus à prescrire ce qui est bon, mais à *orienter subtilement vers ce qui est supposé efficace*. Il n’y a plus de sujet de droit, mais *un agent d’environnement*, à moduler sans bruit, sans choc, sans conflit. Le pouvoir n’interdit plus : *il arrange*. L’archicration, ici, s’efface derrière l’ergonomie, la bienveillance, la gouvernance par les courbes. Mais cet effacement est précisément la ruse *d’un pouvoir qui ne veut plus se nommer comme tel*. Il ne s’agit plus de produire le consentement, mais de *rendre la déviation improbable*. Ce que le *nudge* sacrifie, en dernière instance, c’est *l’épreuve du dissensus*. +Le *nudge*, en tant qu'ingénierie douce du comportement, opère à un +autre niveau : il *remplace la loi par la suggestion*, *le commandement +par la courbe de probabilité*. Né de l'économie comportementale (Thaler +& Sunstein, *Nudge*, 2008), il incarne une rationalité post-normative, +où l'on ne cherche plus à prescrire ce qui est bon, mais à *orienter +subtilement vers ce qui est supposé efficace*. Il n'y a plus de sujet de +droit, mais *un agent d'environnement*, à moduler sans bruit, sans choc, +sans conflit. Le pouvoir n'interdit plus : *il arrange*. L'archicration, +ici, s'efface derrière l'ergonomie, la bienveillance, la gouvernance par +les courbes. Mais cet effacement est précisément la ruse *d'un pouvoir +qui ne veut plus se nommer comme tel*. Il ne s'agit plus de produire le +consentement, mais de *rendre la déviation improbable*. Ce que le +*nudge* sacrifie, en dernière instance, c'est *l'épreuve du dissensus*. -Quant aux *plateformes numériques*, elles réalisent la forme la plus avancée d’une régulation sans scène, sans dialogue, sans altérité. Ce ne sont pas simplement des dispositifs techniques ou des entreprises commerciales : *elles forment un espace de vie, de travail, de socialité intégralement codé*. Leur pouvoir n’est pas celui de l’État, ni celui du marché au sens classique : *c’est un pouvoir infrastructural, environnemental, inscriptif*. Comme le souligne Zuboff dans *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), il s’agit là d’un nouveau type de domination, dans lequel *les comportements humains sont extraits, prédits, modélisés, revendus, optimisés* — sans que le sujet ait jamais été appelé à exprimer un quelconque accord réel. La souveraineté a été *externalisée dans l’architecture logicielle*. +Quant aux *plateformes numériques*, elles réalisent la forme la plus +avancée d'une régulation sans scène, sans dialogue, sans altérité. Ce ne +sont pas simplement des dispositifs techniques ou des entreprises +commerciales : *elles forment un espace de vie, de travail, de socialité +intégralement codé*. Leur pouvoir n'est pas celui de l'État, ni celui du +marché au sens classique : *c'est un pouvoir infrastructural, +environnemental, inscriptif*. Comme le souligne Zuboff dans *The Age of +Surveillance Capitalism* (2019), il s'agit là d'un nouveau type de +domination, dans lequel *les comportements humains sont extraits, +prédits, modélisés, revendus, optimisés* — sans que le sujet ait +jamais été appelé à exprimer un quelconque accord réel. La souveraineté +a été *externalisée dans l'architecture logicielle*. -Ce qui unit ces trois figures, malgré leurs différences, c’est *l’effacement des médiations symboliques et politiques* : il n’y a plus de loi discutée, plus d’espace public institué, plus de parole contradictoire. Le régime archicratique se radicalise en *archicration oblitérée* : non pas absence de régulation, mais *régulation sans reconnaissance*. Non pas désordre, mais *ordre sans dialogue*. Ce que ces dispositifs produisent, c’est *une pacification apparente*, une normativité sans voix, un monde où l’ajustement remplace le conflit, et où l’inadéquation devient inintelligible. +Ce qui unit ces trois figures, malgré leurs différences, c'est +*l'effacement des médiations symboliques et politiques* : il n'y a plus +de loi discutée, plus d'espace public institué, plus de parole +contradictoire. Le régime archicratique se radicalise en *archicration +oblitérée* : non pas absence de régulation, mais *régulation sans +reconnaissance*. Non pas désordre, mais *ordre sans dialogue*. Ce que +ces dispositifs produisent, c'est *une pacification apparente*, une +normativité sans voix, un monde où l'ajustement remplace le conflit, et +où l'inadéquation devient inintelligible. -Ainsi se ferme une boucle décisive dans notre démonstration : *l’archicration, dans sa forme oblitérée, ne cesse pas d’exister — elle cesse d’être visible*. Et c’est là que réside peut-être son plus grand danger : devenir indiscutable moins par la force que par le *design* ; tendre à la totalisation moins par excès de volonté que par effacement du politique. Le pouvoir n’est plus là où l’on croyait devoir le chercher : il se loge dans la forme du bouton, dans la suggestion de l’interface, dans le score de crédit, dans le choix prédéfini. Il est dans l’ordre silencieux du monde algorithmisé. +Ainsi se ferme une boucle décisive dans notre démonstration : +*l'archicration, dans sa forme oblitérée, ne cesse pas d'exister — elle cesse d'être visible*. Et c'est là que réside peut-être son plus +grand danger : devenir indiscutable moins par la force que par le +*design* ; tendre à la totalisation moins par excès de volonté que par +effacement du politique. Le pouvoir n'est plus là où l'on croyait devoir +le chercher : il se loge dans la forme du bouton, dans la suggestion de +l'interface, dans le score de crédit, dans le choix prédéfini. Il est +dans l'ordre silencieux du monde algorithmisé. -La suite de notre essai-thèse devra donc affronter une question centrale : *comment repolitiser l’archicration ?* Comment restaurer l’épreuve, l’altérité et le dissensus dans un monde où les normes se dissolvent dans les flux et où le conflit devient difficilement pensable sous l’effet même des régulations codées ? C’est là le cœur de la bifurcation contemporaine. Et c’est là que commence la tâche philosophique la plus urgente de notre époque. +La suite de notre essai-thèse devra donc affronter une question centrale +: *comment repolitiser l'archicration ?* Comment restaurer l'épreuve, +l'altérité et le dissensus dans un monde où les normes se dissolvent +dans les flux et où le conflit devient difficilement pensable sous +l'effet même des régulations codées ? C'est là le cœur de la bifurcation +contemporaine. Et c'est là que commence la tâche philosophique la plus +urgente de notre époque. -### 4.5.5 — Figures critiques et résistances émergentes : lignes de fuite dans l’ère de l’archicration oblitérée +### 4.5.5 — Figures critiques et résistances émergentes : lignes de fuite dans l'ère de l'archicration oblitérée -La séquence ouverte par la quatrième révolution industrielle — bio-algocratique, machinique, post-normative — ne s’achève pas dans la clôture d’un monde intégralement régulé, entièrement automatisé, parfaitement lissé. Bien au contraire : plus la régulation devient silencieuse, plus elle suscite des formes de résistance inédites, des gestes d’insoumission latente et des percées critiques. Car l’oblitération de la scène régulatoire ne supprime pas la conflictualité : elle la déplace, et contraint le dissensus à se reformuler dans les interstices du système. +La séquence ouverte par la quatrième révolution industrielle — bio-algocratique, machinique, post-normative — ne s'achève pas dans la +clôture d'un monde intégralement régulé, entièrement automatisé, +parfaitement lissé. Bien au contraire : plus la régulation devient +silencieuse, plus elle suscite des formes de résistance inédites, des +gestes d'insoumission latente et des percées critiques. Car +l'oblitération de la scène régulatoire ne supprime pas la conflictualité +: elle la déplace, et contraint le dissensus à se reformuler dans les +interstices du système. -Une hypothèse forte s’impose alors : *le régime archicratique oblitéré n’annule pas la conflictualité — il la déplace*. Il ne supprime pas l’épreuve — il la rend illisible. Et ce déplacement génère *un nouveau régime de luttes*, fondé non plus sur l’opposition frontale à une autorité identifiable, mais sur *l’exhumation des infrastructures, la mise au jour des codes, la réactivation des corps*. Dans cette configuration, les figures critiques ne sont plus principalement des représentants institués, des porte-voix organiques ou des opposants identifiables : elles prennent la forme de gestes, d’interventions, de brèches ou de contre-dispositifs ponctuels. +Une hypothèse forte s'impose alors : *le régime archicratique oblitéré +n'annule pas la conflictualité — il la déplace*. Il ne supprime pas +l'épreuve — il la rend illisible. Et ce déplacement génère *un nouveau +régime de luttes*, fondé non plus sur l'opposition frontale à une +autorité identifiable, mais sur *l'exhumation des infrastructures, la +mise au jour des codes, la réactivation des corps*. Dans cette +configuration, les figures critiques ne sont plus principalement des +représentants institués, des porte-voix organiques ou des opposants +identifiables : elles prennent la forme de gestes, d'interventions, de +brèches ou de contre-dispositifs ponctuels. -Ainsi se dessine une constellation mouvante de résistances émergentes, qu’il faut analyser non comme un catalogue de pratiques, mais comme des tentatives hétérogènes de repolitisation de l’archicration par la restitution de sa visibilité. Cette re-figuration prend plusieurs formes, que nous allons déployer ici comme autant de figures paradigmatiques de la contre-archicration contemporaine. Car là où le pouvoir se retire derrière l’écran, la plateforme ou l’algorithme, *c’est dans le geste de dévoilement que réside l’acte politique*. +Ainsi se dessine une constellation mouvante de résistances émergentes, +qu'il faut analyser non comme un catalogue de pratiques, mais comme des +tentatives hétérogènes de repolitisation de l'archicration par la +restitution de sa visibilité. Cette re-figuration prend plusieurs +formes, que nous allons déployer ici comme autant de figures +paradigmatiques de la contre-archicration contemporaine. Car là où le +pouvoir se retire derrière l'écran, la plateforme ou l'algorithme, +*c'est dans le geste de dévoilement que réside l'acte politique*. Dans cette perspective, la présente section abordera successivement : -- La figure du *lanceur d’alerte* (*whistleblower*) comme brèche dans la souveraineté opaque : Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, et les formes contemporaines de dévoilement comme reconstruction de l’espace public. +- La figure du *lanceur d'alerte* (*whistleblower*) comme brèche dans la + souveraineté opaque : Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, + et les formes contemporaines de dévoilement comme reconstruction de + l'espace public. -- La figure du *pirate informatique* (*hacker*) comme forçage du code archicratique : pratiques de désobéissance numérique, sabotage algorithmique, cryptographie militante, décentralisation autogérée. +- La figure du *pirate informatique* (*hacker*) comme forçage du code + archicratique : pratiques de désobéissance numérique, sabotage + algorithmique, cryptographie militante, décentralisation autogérée. -- La figure du commun insurgé comme refus de la captation privative : ZAD, logiciels libres, plateformes alternatives, communs techniques et infrastructures coopératives. +- La figure du commun insurgé comme refus de la captation privative : + ZAD, logiciels libres, plateformes alternatives, communs techniques et + infrastructures coopératives. -- La figure du *soulèvement situé* comme réinscription du conflit dans l’expérience vécue : luttes antiracistes, féministes, écoféministes, décoloniales et intersectionnelles, qui réinjectent de la chair, du lieu, du récit, de la voix là où le système archicratique tend à disqualifier l’expérience. +- La figure du *soulèvement situé* comme réinscription du conflit dans + l'expérience vécue : luttes antiracistes, féministes, écoféministes, + décoloniales et intersectionnelles, qui réinjectent de la chair, du + lieu, du récit, de la voix là où le système archicratique tend à + disqualifier l'expérience. -Chacune de ces figures ne peut être comprise isolément. *Elles forment un réseau de contre-pouvoirs, souvent fragmenté, parfois contradictoire, mais convergeant dans leur effort commun : rendre à nouveau visible ce que l’archicration avait dissimulé* ; réinsuffler de l’épreuve là où ne restait que la norme automatisée ; *déstabiliser la prétention au sans-faille, au sans-friction, au sans-discussion*. +Chacune de ces figures ne peut être comprise isolément. *Elles forment +un réseau de contre-pouvoirs, souvent fragmenté, parfois contradictoire, +mais convergeant dans leur effort commun : rendre à nouveau visible ce +que l'archicration avait dissimulé* ; réinsuffler de l'épreuve là où ne +restait que la norme automatisée ; *déstabiliser la prétention au +sans-faille, au sans-friction, au sans-discussion*. -Elles ouvrent, dans les failles du régime, des possibilités de réouverture archicrative. Car ce n’est pas l’archicration elle-même qui est à abolir — mais *son effacement comme épreuve*. La politique ne commence pas où s’arrête la régulation, mais *là où elle redevient visible et discutable*. +Elles ouvrent, dans les failles du régime, des possibilités de +réouverture archicrative. Car ce n'est pas l'archicration elle-même qui +est à abolir — mais *son effacement comme épreuve*. La politique ne +commence pas où s'arrête la régulation, mais *là où elle redevient +visible et discutable*. -Ce n’est pas un hasard si, à mesure que le pouvoir devient technique, dispersé, silencieux, les figures de la dissidence migrent elles aussi vers les marges de l’infrastructure. Dans l’univers de l’archicration oblitérée — où la régulation s’effectue sans scène, sans garant, sans confrontation explicite — la dissidence ne peut plus prendre principalement appui sur les formes classiques de l’antagonisme institutionnel. Elle doit frapper au cœur de l’opacité systémique. C’est là que surgit la *figure du whistleblower :* non pas simplement comme lanceur d’alerte, mais comme *opérateur de vérité dans un monde saturé de gouvernance opaque*. +Ce n'est pas un hasard si, à mesure que le pouvoir devient technique, +dispersé, silencieux, les figures de la dissidence migrent elles aussi +vers les marges de l'infrastructure. Dans l'univers de l'archicration +oblitérée — où la régulation s'effectue sans scène, sans garant, sans +confrontation explicite — la dissidence ne peut plus prendre +principalement appui sur les formes classiques de l'antagonisme +institutionnel. Elle doit frapper au cœur de l'opacité systémique. C'est +là que surgit la *figure du whistleblower :* non pas simplement comme +lanceur d'alerte, mais comme *opérateur de vérité dans un monde saturé +de gouvernance opaque*. -Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange : autant de noms qui, bien au-delà de leur dimension biographique ou héroïque, incarnent un *type inédit d’insubordination politique*, propre à l’ère des infrastructures obscures. Ils ne s’adressent pas au souverain, ne demandent pas audience, ne pétitionnent pas. *Ils exposent*. Ils *ouvrent les coffres-forts du pouvoir algorithmique*, en révélant non pas seulement des faits, mais *des architectures de régulation invisibles*. Par leur geste, c’est l’infrastructure elle-même qui devient visible, c’est l’archicration elle-même qui est désignée. +Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange : autant de noms qui, +bien au-delà de leur dimension biographique ou héroïque, incarnent un +*type inédit d'insubordination politique*, propre à l'ère des +infrastructures obscures. Ils ne s'adressent pas au souverain, ne +demandent pas audience, ne pétitionnent pas. *Ils exposent*. Ils +*ouvrent les coffres-forts du pouvoir algorithmique*, en révélant non +pas seulement des faits, mais *des architectures de régulation +invisibles*. Par leur geste, c'est l'infrastructure elle-même qui +devient visible, c'est l'archicration elle-même qui est désignée. -Ce qui s’opère ici, c’est une levée partielle de l’opacité du réel : là où le pouvoir numérique repose sur l’invisibilité de ses mécanismes, le lanceur d’alerte brise le charme opaque du système. Il met en échec ce que Byung-Chul Han nomme *l'inaccessibilité des dispositifs algorithmiques* (*Psychopolitique*, 2014), à savoir l’impossibilité structurelle, pour le citoyen ordinaire, de comprendre ou même de soupçonner les logiques réelles de régulation à l’œuvre. De sorte que le *whistleblower transforme cette opacité en événement de dévoilement*. Il politise ce qui était présenté comme pur dispositif technique. +Ce qui s'opère ici, c'est une levée partielle de l'opacité du réel : là +où le pouvoir numérique repose sur l'invisibilité de ses mécanismes, le +lanceur d'alerte brise le charme opaque du système. Il met en échec ce +que Byung-Chul Han nomme *l'inaccessibilité des dispositifs +algorithmiques* (*Psychopolitique*, 2014), à savoir l'impossibilité +structurelle, pour le citoyen ordinaire, de comprendre ou même de +soupçonner les logiques réelles de régulation à l'œuvre. De sorte que le +*whistleblower transforme cette opacité en événement de dévoilement*. Il +politise ce qui était présenté comme pur dispositif technique. -Mais cette politisation opère sans organe représentatif, sans cadre délibératif classique. Elle est *sans médiation*. Elle traverse le corps du dissident, le lie immédiatement à l’infrastructure numérique, et *court-circuite les scènes conventionnelles de la démocratie libérale*. Ce que Snowden révèle en 2013, ce n’est pas seulement l’existence de programmes de surveillance massifs comme PRISM ou XKeyscore, c’est l’annulation pratique de toute distinction entre contrôle étatique et gouvernance privée, entre surveillance extérieure et extraction permanente de données. Son geste ne se réduit pas à la dénonciation : il documente et met au jour une architecture de régulation contemporaine. Il ne propose pas à lui seul une réforme, mais il oblige à requalifier les conditions mêmes de visibilité du pouvoir technique. +Mais cette politisation opère sans organe représentatif, sans cadre +délibératif classique. Elle est *sans médiation*. Elle traverse le corps +du dissident, le lie immédiatement à l'infrastructure numérique, et +*court-circuite les scènes conventionnelles de la démocratie libérale*. +Ce que Snowden révèle en 2013, ce n'est pas seulement l'existence de +programmes de surveillance massifs comme PRISM ou XKeyscore, c'est +l'annulation pratique de toute distinction entre contrôle étatique et +gouvernance privée, entre surveillance extérieure et extraction +permanente de données. Son geste ne se réduit pas à la dénonciation : il +documente et met au jour une architecture de régulation contemporaine. +Il ne propose pas à lui seul une réforme, mais il oblige à requalifier +les conditions mêmes de visibilité du pouvoir technique. -Ce geste constitue en soi une épreuve archicratique. En révélant les mécanismes régulateurs dissimulés, le *lanceur d’alerte* redonne une scène à l’épreuve. Il fait apparaître *l’infrastructure comme lieu du politique*. Dans ce sens, il ne s’oppose pas frontalement à une loi ou à un décret : *il oppose la visibilité à l’opacité, la parole à l’automatisation, la subjectivation à la captation*. Il démasque une neutralité supposée, et perturbe un pouvoir qui se présente comme simple dispositif technique. +Ce geste constitue en soi une épreuve archicratique. En révélant les +mécanismes régulateurs dissimulés, le *lanceur d'alerte* redonne une +scène à l'épreuve. Il fait apparaître *l'infrastructure comme lieu du +politique*. Dans ce sens, il ne s'oppose pas frontalement à une loi ou à +un décret : *il oppose la visibilité à l'opacité, la parole à +l'automatisation, la subjectivation à la captation*. Il démasque une +neutralité supposée, et perturbe un pouvoir qui se présente comme simple +dispositif technique. -Mais ce geste est aussi radicalement dangereux. Car en révélant l’architecture invisible de l’archicration, il menace *la fiction fondamentale de la gouvernance post-normative* : celle selon laquelle il n’y aurait plus d’autorité, mais seulement des flux, des interfaces, des paramètres. *Il réintroduit la possibilité d’une conflictualité là où l’on prétendait avoir pacifié le monde*. D’où les châtiments qui frappent ces figures : exils, enfermements, diffamations, harcèlements judiciaires, neutralisation symbolique. Les démocraties libérales, pourtant fondées en principe sur des exigences de publicité et de contrôle, se révèlent ici profondément ambivalentes à l’égard de ceux qui dévoilent la régulation réelle. Au nom de la stabilité, elles tendent alors à reconduire l’opacité qu’elles prétendent limiter. +Mais ce geste est aussi radicalement dangereux. Car en révélant +l'architecture invisible de l'archicration, il menace *la fiction +fondamentale de la gouvernance post-normative* : celle selon laquelle il +n'y aurait plus d'autorité, mais seulement des flux, des interfaces, des +paramètres. *Il réintroduit la possibilité d'une conflictualité là où +l'on prétendait avoir pacifié le monde*. D'où les châtiments qui +frappent ces figures : exils, enfermements, diffamations, harcèlements +judiciaires, neutralisation symbolique. Les démocraties libérales, +pourtant fondées en principe sur des exigences de publicité et de +contrôle, se révèlent ici profondément ambivalentes à l'égard de ceux +qui dévoilent la régulation réelle. Au nom de la stabilité, elles +tendent alors à reconduire l'opacité qu'elles prétendent limiter. -Le *whistleblower* n’est donc pas un héros romantique ou un martyr moral : *il est un opérateur critique de premier ordre dans la guerre archicratique contemporaine*. Il révèle que le régime archicratique oblitéré n’est pas post-politique — il est anti-politique. Et que *la seule manière d’en reprendre la maîtrise passe par la révélation de ses architectures*. En cela, le lanceur d’alerte opère une re-figuration de l’espace public : il *remet en scène* les dispositifs, *réinscrit* la conflictualité là où elle avait été oblitérée, *relance* l’épreuve là où elle avait été dissoute. +Le *whistleblower* n'est donc pas un héros romantique ou un martyr moral +: *il est un opérateur critique de premier ordre dans la guerre +archicratique contemporaine*. Il révèle que le régime archicratique +oblitéré n'est pas post-politique — il est anti-politique. Et que *la +seule manière d'en reprendre la maîtrise passe par la révélation de ses +architectures*. En cela, le lanceur d'alerte opère une re-figuration de +l'espace public : il *remet en scène* les dispositifs, *réinscrit* la +conflictualité là où elle avait été oblitérée, *relance* l'épreuve là où +elle avait été dissoute. -Si le *lanceur d’alerte* incarne la figure du dévoilement, le *pirate informatique* (*hacker*), quant à lui, incarne celle du *forçage*. Là où le premier ouvre à la visibilité ce qui était tenu dans l’ombre, le second *intervient au cœur du dispositif*, non pour l’exposer, mais pour *le détourner, le dérégler, le subvertir de l’intérieur*. Le *hacker* est à la fois opérateur technique, acteur politique et *esthète de l’incongru numérique*. Il ne s’oppose pas frontalement au pouvoir ; *il infiltre son code source*, il le déjoue, il l’attaque en sa syntaxe même. En cela, il constitue une figure majeure du dissensus dans les régimes d’*archicration oblitérée*. +Si le *lanceur d'alerte* incarne la figure du dévoilement, le *pirate +informatique* (*hacker*), quant à lui, incarne celle du *forçage*. Là où +le premier ouvre à la visibilité ce qui était tenu dans l'ombre, le +second *intervient au cœur du dispositif*, non pour l'exposer, mais pour +*le détourner, le dérégler, le subvertir de l'intérieur*. Le *hacker* +est à la fois opérateur technique, acteur politique et *esthète de +l'incongru numérique*. Il ne s'oppose pas frontalement au pouvoir ; *il +infiltre son code source*, il le déjoue, il l'attaque en sa syntaxe +même. En cela, il constitue une figure majeure du dissensus dans les +régimes d'*archicration oblitérée*. -Le *hacker* ne nie pas la structure — il la connaît parfaitement et *l’altère à l’échelle de ses compétences*. Il ne cherche pas à revenir à un état antérieur du pouvoir — il en démontre l’arbitraire, l’irrationalité et l’idéologie, en *jouant de ses propres règles contre lui-même*. À travers cette logique, il fait émerger ce qu’on pourrait nommer une *épistémopolitique de l’intervention* : il s’introduit dans les boucles fermées de la régulation algorithmique pour y injecter du bruit, du contre-code, des bifurcations imprévues. Cette stratégie, par essence non-institutionnelle, réinvente les modes d’agir dans un monde où les normes ne sont plus énoncées, mais programmées. +Le *hacker* ne nie pas la structure — il la connaît parfaitement et +*l'altère à l'échelle de ses compétences*. Il ne cherche pas à revenir à +un état antérieur du pouvoir — il en démontre l'arbitraire, +l'irrationalité et l'idéologie, en *jouant de ses propres règles contre +lui-même*. À travers cette logique, il fait émerger ce qu'on pourrait +nommer une *épistémopolitique de l'intervention* : il s'introduit dans +les boucles fermées de la régulation algorithmique pour y injecter du +bruit, du contre-code, des bifurcations imprévues. Cette stratégie, par +essence non-institutionnelle, réinvente les modes d'agir dans un monde +où les normes ne sont plus énoncées, mais programmées. -Historiquement, cette posture est indissociable de l’évolution même de l’infrastructure numérique. Dès les années 1960, au sein du MIT, les premiers hackers revendiquent une *éthique du code libre*, une esthétique de l’exploration logique et une pratique de la dé-hiérarchisation des systèmes. Avec les années 1980 et l’essor des *bulletin board systems*, le hacking se politise, notamment à travers la constitution de collectifs comme *Cult of the Dead Cow* ou *2600: The Hacker Quarterly*. Il devient non plus un jeu solitaire de dépassement technique, mais un *geste collectif d’irruption critique dans l’espace numérique mondialisé*. +Historiquement, cette posture est indissociable de l'évolution même de +l'infrastructure numérique. Dès les années 1960, au sein du MIT, les +premiers hackers revendiquent une *éthique du code libre*, une +esthétique de l'exploration logique et une pratique de la +dé-hiérarchisation des systèmes. Avec les années 1980 et l'essor des +*bulletin board systems*, le hacking se politise, notamment à travers la +constitution de collectifs comme *Cult of the Dead Cow* ou *2600: The +Hacker Quarterly*. Il devient non plus un jeu solitaire de dépassement +technique, mais un *geste collectif d'irruption critique dans l'espace +numérique mondialisé*. -Mais c’est avec les années 2000 que cette figure prend une dimension géopolitique : *le hacker devient opérateur de conflictualité dans la guerre des normes*. L’exemple du *Chaos Computer Club* en Allemagne, les opérations de *WikiLeaks*, les actions de *Anonymous*, les luttes de *CryptoParties* contre la surveillance de masse — tous ces gestes traduisent une tentative de *repolitisation du code*. Le hacking n’est pas une criminalité technique : c’est une *praxis politique* propre aux régimes techniques contemporains dans un monde où le pouvoir n’a plus de visage, mais des protocoles, des API, des couches logiques. +Mais c'est avec les années 2000 que cette figure prend une dimension +géopolitique : *le hacker devient opérateur de conflictualité dans la +guerre des normes*. L'exemple du *Chaos Computer Club* en Allemagne, les +opérations de *WikiLeaks*, les actions de *Anonymous*, les luttes de +*CryptoParties* contre la surveillance de masse — tous ces gestes +traduisent une tentative de *repolitisation du code*. Le hacking n'est +pas une criminalité technique : c'est une *praxis politique* propre aux +régimes techniques contemporains dans un monde où le pouvoir n'a plus de +visage, mais des protocoles, des API, des couches logiques. -L’un des traits fondamentaux du *hacker* réside alors dans sa *capacité à révéler le politique là où l’on prétendait qu’il n’y avait que de l’optimisation*. Le code devient scène d’épreuve. Ce que les institutions présentent comme nécessaire, technique, neutre, le *hacker* le met en procès : *il prouve que tout dispositif est une inscription idéologique*, que toute architecture logicielle contient des choix de monde, des décisions de forme, des exclusions de possibles. +L'un des traits fondamentaux du *hacker* réside alors dans sa *capacité +à révéler le politique là où l'on prétendait qu'il n'y avait que de +l'optimisation*. Le code devient scène d'épreuve. Ce que les +institutions présentent comme nécessaire, technique, neutre, le *hacker* +le met en procès : *il prouve que tout dispositif est une inscription +idéologique*, que toute architecture logicielle contient des choix de +monde, des décisions de forme, des exclusions de possibles. -Ainsi, en forçant les architectures opaques de la régulation contemporaine, il défait le caractère apparemment évident des dispositifs. Il fait apparaître le pouvoir sous des formes décryptées. Il restaure *l’espace du dissensus dans l’univers post-normatif de l’archicration dispersée*. Cette opération est à la fois technique, éthique et politique. Technique, parce qu’elle exige une maîtrise fine des langages de programmation, des systèmes d’exploitation et des interconnexions réseau. Éthique, parce qu’elle conteste la clôture hétéronome des dispositifs et rouvre un espace de réappropriation critique. Politique, enfin, parce qu’elle restitue de la conflictualité là où le code prétendait s’imposer comme évidence. +Ainsi, en forçant les architectures opaques de la régulation +contemporaine, il défait le caractère apparemment évident des +dispositifs. Il fait apparaître le pouvoir sous des formes décryptées. +Il restaure *l'espace du dissensus dans l'univers post-normatif de +l'archicration dispersée*. Cette opération est à la fois technique, +éthique et politique. Technique, parce qu'elle exige une maîtrise fine +des langages de programmation, des systèmes d'exploitation et des +interconnexions réseau. Éthique, parce qu'elle conteste la clôture +hétéronome des dispositifs et rouvre un espace de réappropriation +critique. Politique, enfin, parce qu'elle restitue de la conflictualité +là où le code prétendait s'imposer comme évidence. -Mais, comme pour le *whistleblower*, cette posture n’échappe pas à la répression : criminalisation, infiltration, cooptation, marchandisation des outils critiques. Le *white hat* devient parfois *cyber-soldat*, enrôlé par les États dans la guerre asymétrique numérique ; le *grey hat* devient entrepreneur de sécurité ; les outils issus de l’éthique hacker sont récupérés dans les architectures de surveillance (ex. : Tor utilisé par les services de renseignement eux-mêmes). *Toute subversion produit ses contre-subversions*. Toute ligne de fuite peut être capturée. +Mais, comme pour le *whistleblower*, cette posture n'échappe pas à la +répression : criminalisation, infiltration, cooptation, marchandisation +des outils critiques. Le *white hat* devient parfois *cyber-soldat*, +enrôlé par les États dans la guerre asymétrique numérique ; le *grey +hat* devient entrepreneur de sécurité ; les outils issus de l'éthique +hacker sont récupérés dans les architectures de surveillance (ex. : Tor +utilisé par les services de renseignement eux-mêmes). *Toute subversion +produit ses contre-subversions*. Toute ligne de fuite peut être +capturée. -Et pourtant, le geste demeure opératoire. Dans un monde où la régulation s’énonce par défaut, le hacker fait vaciller l’impensé des dispositifs. Il rappelle que le pouvoir algorithmique, si puissant soit-il, n’est pas absolu : il est écrit, et peut donc être réécrit. La conflictualité redevient possible, non par retour aux formes anciennes du politique, mais par *invention de gestes critiques à l’intérieur même des régimes de pouvoir technique*. +Et pourtant, le geste demeure opératoire. Dans un monde où la régulation +s'énonce par défaut, le hacker fait vaciller l'impensé des dispositifs. +Il rappelle que le pouvoir algorithmique, si puissant soit-il, n'est pas +absolu : il est écrit, et peut donc être réécrit. La conflictualité +redevient possible, non par retour aux formes anciennes du politique, +mais par *invention de gestes critiques à l'intérieur même des régimes +de pouvoir technique*. -Si les figures du *whistleblower* et du *hacker* incarnent des gestes critiques souvent individuels, surgissant à l’intérieur du dispositif technopolitique pour en fissurer la cohérence ou en forcer les logiques, la figure du dissident socio-technique collectif engage un autre type d’opération : non plus la subversion ponctuelle ou l’exfiltration d’information, mais l’invention d’architectures de régulation alternatives et d’écologies normatives non alignées sur les matrices dominantes. Il ne s’agit plus de révéler ou de détourner : il s’agit de *fabriquer d’autres mondes* régulés autrement, hors de la scène archicratique officielle, contre elle, ou à ses marges. +Si les figures du *whistleblower* et du *hacker* incarnent des gestes +critiques souvent individuels, surgissant à l'intérieur du dispositif +technopolitique pour en fissurer la cohérence ou en forcer les logiques, +la figure du dissident socio-technique collectif engage un autre type +d'opération : non plus la subversion ponctuelle ou l'exfiltration +d'information, mais l'invention d'architectures de régulation +alternatives et d'écologies normatives non alignées sur les matrices +dominantes. Il ne s'agit plus de révéler ou de détourner : il s'agit de +*fabriquer d'autres mondes* régulés autrement, hors de la scène +archicratique officielle, contre elle, ou à ses marges. -Cette figure prend corps dans des expérimentations multiples et convergentes, qui échappent aux catégorisations binaires classiques : ni purement politiques au sens traditionnel (partis, syndicats), ni purement techniques (innovations neutralisées), ni strictement sociales (revendications identitaires ou sectorielles). Elle opère à la fois sur les conditions d’accès au monde (*arcalité*), sur les formes de puissance mobilisable (*cratialité*) et sur les modes d’inscription normative (*archicration*). C’est en ce sens que la dissidence socio-technique est véritablement une force archicratique alternative : *elle configure des contre-régimes de régulation* — expérimentaux, instables, inachevés, mais réels. +Cette figure prend corps dans des expérimentations multiples et +convergentes, qui échappent aux catégorisations binaires classiques : ni +purement politiques au sens traditionnel (partis, syndicats), ni +purement techniques (innovations neutralisées), ni strictement sociales +(revendications identitaires ou sectorielles). Elle opère à la fois sur +les conditions d'accès au monde (*arcalité*), sur les formes de +puissance mobilisable (*cratialité*) et sur les modes d'inscription +normative (*archicration*). C'est en ce sens que la dissidence +socio-technique est véritablement une force archicratique alternative : +*elle configure des contre-régimes de régulation* — expérimentaux, +instables, inachevés, mais réels. -Parmi les expressions les plus emblématiques de cette puissance émergente, les ZAD — Zones à Défendre — constituent une matrice exemplaire. À Notre-Dame-des-Landes, à Bure, à Sivens ou ailleurs, ce n’est pas seulement un territoire qui est occupé : c’est une grammaire régulatoire qui est mise à l’épreuve. Les ZAD instaurent une *arcalité insurgée*, dans laquelle le sol n’est plus gouverné par des grilles cadastrales, des titres fonciers ou des plans d’urbanisme, mais par une réinvention communautaire de l’espace comme lieu de vie, de soin, de liens. *Il ne s’agit pas d’anomie, mais de production située de normes* : les règles ne sont pas abolies, seulement reformulées selon des critères de viabilité située, de décision collective, de refus de l’extractivisme. L’usage du sol y devient politique au sens fort, car *la possibilité même d’un monde habitable est réinterrogée*. +Parmi les expressions les plus emblématiques de cette puissance +émergente, les ZAD — Zones à Défendre — constituent une matrice +exemplaire. À Notre-Dame-des-Landes, à Bure, à Sivens ou ailleurs, ce +n'est pas seulement un territoire qui est occupé : c'est une grammaire +régulatoire qui est mise à l'épreuve. Les ZAD instaurent une *arcalité +insurgée*, dans laquelle le sol n'est plus gouverné par des grilles +cadastrales, des titres fonciers ou des plans d'urbanisme, mais par une +réinvention communautaire de l'espace comme lieu de vie, de soin, de +liens. *Il ne s'agit pas d'anomie, mais de production située de normes* +: les règles ne sont pas abolies, seulement reformulées selon des +critères de viabilité située, de décision collective, de refus de +l'extractivisme. L'usage du sol y devient politique au sens fort, car +*la possibilité même d'un monde habitable est réinterrogée*. -De même, dans les mouvements de *hacking social* — tels que les collectifs de libre accès, les associations de cryptographie citoyenne, les coopératives de données (MyData, Framasoft, etc.) — on assiste à une tentative délibérée de *reprendre la main sur les régimes de circulation informationnelle*. Ces initiatives n’ont rien d’anecdotique : elles visent à *désoblitérer la régulation*, à restaurer une visibilité des normes, une réappropriation des décisions, *une réappropriation maîtrisée du système technique*. Le code y est considéré comme une forme de droit, les interfaces comme des médiations politiques, les architectures comme des institutions. En cela, elles renouent avec le geste fondamental de l’archicration : *l’inscription visible, partageable et contestable de ce qui régule*. +De même, dans les mouvements de *hacking social* — tels que les +collectifs de libre accès, les associations de cryptographie citoyenne, +les coopératives de données (MyData, Framasoft, etc.) — on assiste à +une tentative délibérée de *reprendre la main sur les régimes de +circulation informationnelle*. Ces initiatives n'ont rien d'anecdotique +: elles visent à *désoblitérer la régulation*, à restaurer une +visibilité des normes, une réappropriation des décisions, *une +réappropriation maîtrisée du système technique*. Le code y est considéré +comme une forme de droit, les interfaces comme des médiations +politiques, les architectures comme des institutions. En cela, elles +renouent avec le geste fondamental de l'archicration : *l'inscription +visible, partageable et contestable de ce qui régule*. -Mais ce geste ne se limite pas au numérique : dans les communs urbains, les ateliers de réparation citoyenne, les coopératives énergétiques ou les réseaux d’agroécologie décentralisée, s’esquisse *une autre forme d’archicration, fondée sur la coprésence, la délibération située et la réciprocité.* C’est un retour, non pas à la norme prescriptive, mais à la *régulation par la réciprocité*. Ces collectifs instituent un pouvoir qui ne passe ni par l’État, ni par l’algorithme, mais par la *délibération située*, la gestion incarnée des interdépendances, le *tissage concret des règles d’existence*. +Mais ce geste ne se limite pas au numérique : dans les communs urbains, +les ateliers de réparation citoyenne, les coopératives énergétiques ou +les réseaux d'agroécologie décentralisée, s'esquisse *une autre forme +d'archicration, fondée sur la coprésence, la délibération située et la +réciprocité.* C'est un retour, non pas à la norme prescriptive, mais à +la *régulation par la réciprocité*. Ces collectifs instituent un pouvoir +qui ne passe ni par l'État, ni par l'algorithme, mais par la +*délibération située*, la gestion incarnée des interdépendances, le +*tissage concret des règles d'existence*. -Cette dynamique rejoint certaines analyses contemporaines de la *désautomatisation* comme puissance politique. Bernard Stiegler, dans *Dans la disruption* (2016), évoquait la possibilité de *réarmer l’autonomie* à travers une reconquête des conditions d’individuation collective — c’est-à-dire la capacité à se gouverner par des processus réflexifs et critiques, à distance du pilotage algorithmique. Les collectifs dissidents, en ce sens, sont des *laboratoires d’individuation instituante*, où l’on tente de désindexer la valeur humaine des métriques automatisées, pour la ressaisir à travers des formes de reconnaissance mutuelle. +Cette dynamique rejoint certaines analyses contemporaines de la +*désautomatisation* comme puissance politique. Bernard Stiegler, dans +*Dans la disruption* (2016), évoquait la possibilité de *réarmer +l'autonomie* à travers une reconquête des conditions d'individuation +collective — c'est-à-dire la capacité à se gouverner par des processus +réflexifs et critiques, à distance du pilotage algorithmique. Les +collectifs dissidents, en ce sens, sont des *laboratoires +d'individuation instituante*, où l'on tente de désindexer la valeur +humaine des métriques automatisées, pour la ressaisir à travers des +formes de reconnaissance mutuelle. -En cela, cette figure du dissident collectif est profondément archicratique : elle ne s’oppose pas seulement à la régulation dominante, elle en *invente une autre*. Elle reconfigure l’épreuve du commun, elle redonne scène à la conflictualité, elle refuse la dissimulation des normes. Elle pose que *réguler n’est pas réduire*, mais *composer avec le vivant*. Ce qui est en jeu ici, c’est la possibilité même d’une *archicration ouverte* — non oblitérée, non capturée, mais habitée, située, disputée, incarnée. Une régulation qui cherche à se faire non contre les vivants, mais à partir d’eux, avec eux, dans des formes situées de composition. +En cela, cette figure du dissident collectif est profondément +archicratique : elle ne s'oppose pas seulement à la régulation +dominante, elle en *invente une autre*. Elle reconfigure l'épreuve du +commun, elle redonne scène à la conflictualité, elle refuse la +dissimulation des normes. Elle pose que *réguler n'est pas réduire*, +mais *composer avec le vivant*. Ce qui est en jeu ici, c'est la +possibilité même d'une *archicration ouverte* — non oblitérée, non +capturée, mais habitée, située, disputée, incarnée. Une régulation qui +cherche à se faire non contre les vivants, mais à partir d'eux, avec +eux, dans des formes situées de composition. -Une autre figure critique se dessine alors : celle de soulèvements ancrés dans des corps, des lieux et des mémoires que le calcul ne peut absorber. Une insurrection ancrée dans des corps, des lieux, des mémoires et des expériences irréductibles aux formats de calcul. Dans les luttes antiracistes, féministes, écoféministes, décoloniales ou intersectionnelles, ce qui revient au premier plan, c’est précisément ce que l’archicration contemporaine tend à disqualifier : l’épaisseur vécue de l’injustice, la dissymétrie concrète des atteintes, la non-neutralité des dispositifs. +Une autre figure critique se dessine alors : celle de soulèvements +ancrés dans des corps, des lieux et des mémoires que le calcul ne peut +absorber. Une insurrection ancrée dans des corps, des lieux, des +mémoires et des expériences irréductibles aux formats de calcul. Dans +les luttes antiracistes, féministes, écoféministes, décoloniales ou +intersectionnelles, ce qui revient au premier plan, c'est précisément ce +que l'archicration contemporaine tend à disqualifier : l'épaisseur vécue +de l'injustice, la dissymétrie concrète des atteintes, la non-neutralité +des dispositifs. -Ces luttes rappellent qu’une régulation n’est jamais un simple agencement technique : elle distribue aussi des visibilités et des invisibilités, des dignités et des indignités, des possibilités d’existence et des formes de relégation. En ce sens, le soulèvement situé réintroduit dans l’analyse archicratique ce que l’abstraction algorithmique tend à dissoudre : le poids du lieu, la texture du corps, la densité du temps historique. Les critiques féministes intersectionnelles montrent ainsi que la norme ne frappe jamais de manière homogène ; les perspectives écoféministes réarticulent corps, territoire et dépossession ; les pensées décoloniales reposent la question décisive de savoir qui définit la norme, qui régule, et au nom de quel monde. +Ces luttes rappellent qu'une régulation n'est jamais un simple +agencement technique : elle distribue aussi des visibilités et des +invisibilités, des dignités et des indignités, des possibilités +d'existence et des formes de relégation. En ce sens, le soulèvement +situé réintroduit dans l'analyse archicratique ce que l'abstraction +algorithmique tend à dissoudre : le poids du lieu, la texture du corps, +la densité du temps historique. Les critiques féministes +intersectionnelles montrent ainsi que la norme ne frappe jamais de +manière homogène ; les perspectives écoféministes réarticulent corps, +territoire et dépossession ; les pensées décoloniales reposent la +question décisive de savoir qui définit la norme, qui régule, et au nom +de quel monde. -Loin d’être périphériques, ces soulèvements constituent donc l’une des lignes de fuite les plus radicales contre l’archicration oblitérée. Ils n’abolissent pas la régulation ; ils la réinscrivent dans des expériences situées, conflictuelles, incarnées. Ils rappellent ainsi qu’une archicration alternative ne pourra pas être seulement plus transparente techniquement : elle devra aussi redevenir habitable pour des existences concrètes, traversées par l’histoire, les asymétries et les luttes du monde réel. +Loin d'être périphériques, ces soulèvements constituent donc l'une des +lignes de fuite les plus radicales contre l'archicration oblitérée. Ils +n'abolissent pas la régulation ; ils la réinscrivent dans des +expériences situées, conflictuelles, incarnées. Ils rappellent ainsi +qu'une archicration alternative ne pourra pas être seulement plus +transparente techniquement : elle devra aussi redevenir habitable pour +des existences concrètes, traversées par l'histoire, les asymétries et +les luttes du monde réel. -Ce que révèle la trajectoire de la quatrième révolution industrielle, dans sa phase d’archicration oblitérée, n’est pas seulement l’intensification d’une régulation automatisée, opaque et anticipatrice, mais aussi l’apparition d’un seuil critique à partir duquel l’invisibilisation des normes, l’effacement du dissensus et la dissolution des garants deviennent politiquement difficilement soutenables. C’est à ce seuil que se dressent les figures critiques que nous avons étudiées : le *whistleblower*, le *hacker*, le *dissident collectif*. Elles ne se contentent pas de contester, elles *révoquent l’évidence régulatoire* ; elles rejettent le fait que l’organisation du monde puisse se faire sans scène, sans épreuve, sans adresse identifiable. +Ce que révèle la trajectoire de la quatrième révolution industrielle, +dans sa phase d'archicration oblitérée, n'est pas seulement +l'intensification d'une régulation automatisée, opaque et anticipatrice, +mais aussi l'apparition d'un seuil critique à partir duquel +l'invisibilisation des normes, l'effacement du dissensus et la +dissolution des garants deviennent politiquement difficilement +soutenables. C'est à ce seuil que se dressent les figures critiques que +nous avons étudiées : le *whistleblower*, le *hacker*, le *dissident +collectif*. Elles ne se contentent pas de contester, elles *révoquent +l'évidence régulatoire* ; elles rejettent le fait que l'organisation du +monde puisse se faire sans scène, sans épreuve, sans adresse +identifiable. -Ce moment de réactivation critique n’est pas un simple retour de la volonté contre l’automatisme : il manifeste, au cœur même de l’archicration technologique, *la persistance irréductible du politique*. Car le propre du politique, en son sens archicratique fondamental, n’est pas tant de décider que de mettre en forme la possibilité de la contestation, de la délibération et de la reconfiguration des normes. Il est l’espace où l’épreuve de la légitimité est encore possible, où la régulation demeure *adressable*, *négociable*, *transformable*. +Ce moment de réactivation critique n'est pas un simple retour de la +volonté contre l'automatisme : il manifeste, au cœur même de +l'archicration technologique, *la persistance irréductible du +politique*. Car le propre du politique, en son sens archicratique +fondamental, n'est pas tant de décider que de mettre en forme la +possibilité de la contestation, de la délibération et de la +reconfiguration des normes. Il est l'espace où l'épreuve de la +légitimité est encore possible, où la régulation demeure *adressable*, +*négociable*, *transformable*. -Ce que les figures critiques contemporaines mettent à nu, c’est que le pouvoir algorithmique, aussi fluide, préventif, ubiquitaire soit-il, *n’annule pas le conflit*, il le *dérobe*, il le *dissout* dans des matrices d’anticipation où plus rien ne peut être clairement désigné, nommé ou jugé. L’archicration oblitérée est ainsi une forme-limite de la régulation : elle pousse à son extrême la tension constitutive entre efficacité technique et légitimité politique. Elle gouverne sans apparaître, elle module sans répondre, elle évalue sans rendre compte. +Ce que les figures critiques contemporaines mettent à nu, c'est que le +pouvoir algorithmique, aussi fluide, préventif, ubiquitaire soit-il, +*n'annule pas le conflit*, il le *dérobe*, il le *dissout* dans des +matrices d'anticipation où plus rien ne peut être clairement désigné, +nommé ou jugé. L'archicration oblitérée est ainsi une forme-limite de la +régulation : elle pousse à son extrême la tension constitutive entre +efficacité technique et légitimité politique. Elle gouverne sans +apparaître, elle module sans répondre, elle évalue sans rendre compte. -Or cette disparition du répondant — cette évaporation du garant — produit un vide qui appelle à être comblé. Non pas forcément par une restauration de l’État ou une sacralisation du droit, mais par des *formes émergentes d’archicration située*, délibérative, incarnée, *reliée au tissu vivant des existences humaines*. Les hackers qui redonnent accès au code, les lanceurs d’alerte qui ressuscitent la scène publique, les collectifs dissidents qui reconfigurent les conditions mêmes de l’habitable — tous ces gestes sont autant de tentatives de réouverture archicratique, c’est-à-dire de *réinjections de conflictualité, de normativité visible, de régulation ouverte dans un monde qui voulait en finir avec la scène*. +Or cette disparition du répondant — cette évaporation du garant — produit un vide qui appelle à être comblé. Non pas forcément par une +restauration de l'État ou une sacralisation du droit, mais par des +*formes émergentes d'archicration située*, délibérative, incarnée, +*reliée au tissu vivant des existences humaines*. Les hackers qui +redonnent accès au code, les lanceurs d'alerte qui ressuscitent la scène +publique, les collectifs dissidents qui reconfigurent les conditions +mêmes de l'habitable — tous ces gestes sont autant de tentatives de +réouverture archicratique, c'est-à-dire de *réinjections de +conflictualité, de normativité visible, de régulation ouverte dans un +monde qui voulait en finir avec la scène*. -En cela, cette phase terminale de la régulation numérique ne signe pas la fin du politique, mais son *re-déploiement dans l’interstice*. Là où le pouvoir devient silencieux, des subjectivités critiques cherchent à rouvrir la conflictualité. Là où la norme devient difficile à identifier, l’invention sociale tente de la reformuler. Là où l’autorité s’efface, des paroles réapparaissent pour réinstituer une scène. Et cette parole, si elle ne se laisse pas écraser, si elle s’organise, si elle persiste, peut devenir *contre-archicration*, ou mieux encore : *archicration alternative*. Une manière de réguler sans réduire, de structurer sans écraser, de prévoir sans effacer. +En cela, cette phase terminale de la régulation numérique ne signe pas +la fin du politique, mais son *re-déploiement dans l'interstice*. Là où +le pouvoir devient silencieux, des subjectivités critiques cherchent à +rouvrir la conflictualité. Là où la norme devient difficile à +identifier, l'invention sociale tente de la reformuler. Là où l'autorité +s'efface, des paroles réapparaissent pour réinstituer une scène. Et +cette parole, si elle ne se laisse pas écraser, si elle s'organise, si +elle persiste, peut devenir *contre-archicration*, ou mieux encore : +*archicration alternative*. Une manière de réguler sans réduire, de +structurer sans écraser, de prévoir sans effacer. -Nous voici donc face à un carrefour : soit l’archicration se referme dans l’automatisation silencieuse de ses propres normes ; soit elle s’ouvre à nouveau comme scène, comme adresse, comme espace disputable. Et cette ouverture, nul ne peut l’imposer — elle ne peut surgir que des gestes critiques, des insurrections infra-politiques, des bifurcations institutionnelles et technologiques que nous avons commencé ici à tracer. Il nous reste désormais à penser, dans le chapitre suivant, les conditions archistratégiques d’un tel retournement : comment réinstituer une archicration exposable, habitable, négociable — autrement dit capable de rendre à nouveau la régulation visible, discutable et partageable. +Nous voici donc face à un carrefour : soit l'archicration se referme +dans l'automatisation silencieuse de ses propres normes ; soit elle +s'ouvre à nouveau comme scène, comme adresse, comme espace disputable. +Et cette ouverture, nul ne peut l'imposer — elle ne peut surgir que +des gestes critiques, des insurrections infra-politiques, des +bifurcations institutionnelles et technologiques que nous avons commencé +ici à tracer. Il nous reste désormais à penser, dans le chapitre +suivant, les conditions archistratégiques d'un tel retournement : +comment réinstituer une archicration exposable, habitable, négociable — autrement dit capable de rendre à nouveau la régulation visible, +discutable et partageable. -## **4.6 — Archidiagnostic, bilan tensionnel et projections d’instauration : vers une cinquième révolution régulatoire consciente** +## **4.6 — Archidiagnostic, bilan tensionnel et projections d'instauration : vers une cinquième révolution régulatoire consciente** -Il n’est de révolution véritable que dans la régulation elle-même — non dans le décor qu’elle traverse, mais dans la scène qu’elle rend possible ou qu’elle efface. C’est à ce seuil critique que nous sommes parvenus. Après avoir déployé la généalogie tensionnelle des formes de régulation archicratique à travers quatre grandes configurations industrielles — mécanisation proto-disciplinaire, institutionnalisation fordiste, cybernétisation néolibérale et automatisation oblitérante — il devient nécessaire de cartographier les tensions et les écarts qui travaillent l’architecture contemporaine de régulation, afin d’en dégager les seuils d’effondrement ou de transfiguration. +Il n'est de révolution véritable que dans la régulation elle-même — non dans le décor qu'elle traverse, mais dans la scène qu'elle rend +possible ou qu'elle efface. C'est à ce seuil critique que nous sommes +parvenus. Après avoir déployé la généalogie tensionnelle des formes de +régulation archicratique à travers quatre grandes configurations +industrielles — mécanisation proto-disciplinaire, +institutionnalisation fordiste, cybernétisation néolibérale et +automatisation oblitérante — il devient nécessaire de cartographier +les tensions et les écarts qui travaillent l'architecture contemporaine +de régulation, afin d'en dégager les seuils d'effondrement ou de +transfiguration. -Cette section 4.6 ne se présente pas comme une synthèse terminale, encore moins comme une fermeture. Elle est archidiagnostique, au sens fort : elle vise à rendre intelligible, par une analyse stratifiée, la logique différentielle des régimes de régulation mis au jour dans les sections précédentes — leurs cohérences internes, leurs écarts structurants, leurs continuités moins visibles et leurs seuils critiques de tension. Il ne s’agit pas d’énoncer des successions linéaires, mais de restituer la dynamique des dispositifs archicratiques, en montrant comment arcalité, cratialité et archicration se recombinent à chaque phase historique selon des combinaisons distinctes de visibilité, d’universalité, de coercition et de légitimité. +Cette section 4.6 ne se présente pas comme une synthèse terminale, +encore moins comme une fermeture. Elle est archidiagnostique, au sens +fort : elle vise à rendre intelligible, par une analyse stratifiée, la +logique différentielle des régimes de régulation mis au jour dans les +sections précédentes — leurs cohérences internes, leurs écarts +structurants, leurs continuités moins visibles et leurs seuils critiques +de tension. Il ne s'agit pas d'énoncer des successions linéaires, mais +de restituer la dynamique des dispositifs archicratiques, en montrant +comment arcalité, cratialité et archicration se recombinent à chaque +phase historique selon des combinaisons distinctes de visibilité, +d'universalité, de coercition et de légitimité. -Mais cette cartographie serait incomplète si elle ne débouchait pas sur l’hypothèse d’une cinquième configuration de régulation possible : non plus subie ou masquée, mais explicitement instituée, située et réflexive. Ce que nous appelons ici « cinquième révolution régulatoire » n’a rien d’un fantasme téléologique : c’est l’hypothèse d’une reconfiguration réflexive de la régulation, dans laquelle la scène de l’autorité, de la décision et du commun redevient un espace d’épreuve, une forme visible et une infrastructure politique discutable. +Mais cette cartographie serait incomplète si elle ne débouchait pas sur +l'hypothèse d'une cinquième configuration de régulation possible : non +plus subie ou masquée, mais explicitement instituée, située et +réflexive. Ce que nous appelons ici « cinquième révolution régulatoire » +n'a rien d'un fantasme téléologique : c'est l'hypothèse d'une +reconfiguration réflexive de la régulation, dans laquelle la scène de +l'autorité, de la décision et du commun redevient un espace d'épreuve, +une forme visible et une infrastructure politique discutable. -Cette cinquième révolution ne sera pas automatique : elle suppose un diagnostic clair de ce qui, dans les régimes antérieurs, a conduit à l’effacement de la scène, à l’abstraction des épreuves et à la désincarnation de la norme. Elle oblige à penser ensemble les vulnérabilités structurelles du présent — fragilité systémique, opacité algorithmique, déliaison sociale — et les formes émergentes d’un dissensus capable d’instituer à nouveau. Réguler ne peut plus vouloir dire masquer ni automatiser. Réguler doit redevenir : exposer, rendre contestable, instituer. +Cette cinquième révolution ne sera pas automatique : elle suppose un +diagnostic clair de ce qui, dans les régimes antérieurs, a conduit à +l'effacement de la scène, à l'abstraction des épreuves et à la +désincarnation de la norme. Elle oblige à penser ensemble les +vulnérabilités structurelles du présent — fragilité systémique, +opacité algorithmique, déliaison sociale — et les formes émergentes +d'un dissensus capable d'instituer à nouveau. Réguler ne peut plus +vouloir dire masquer ni automatiser. Réguler doit redevenir : exposer, +rendre contestable, instituer. -La section 4.6 suivra donc une triple visée : rendre lisible la matrice A–C–A’ à travers les quatre séquences étudiées ; dégager les points de bascule et les contradictions qui rendent le régime actuel instable ; enfin, esquisser une projection consciente, non prescriptive mais exploratoire, vers une cinquième archicration possible, définie par sa capacité à réinstaurer l’espace du commun comme scène explicite de régulation. +La section 4.6 suivra donc une triple visée : rendre lisible la matrice +A–C–A' à travers les quatre séquences étudiées ; dégager les points de +bascule et les contradictions qui rendent le régime actuel instable ; +enfin, esquisser une projection consciente, non prescriptive mais +exploratoire, vers une cinquième archicration possible, définie par sa +capacité à réinstaurer l'espace du commun comme scène explicite de +régulation. -Il convient toutefois de préciser que les sections 4.2 à 4.5 ont suivi des séquences d’émergence historiquement situées, tandis que la matrice qui suit condense des régimes longs de domination relative, partiellement chevauchants, afin d’en faire apparaître la logique structurelle plutôt que d’en reconduire une lecture linéaire. +Il convient toutefois de préciser que les sections 4.2 à 4.5 ont suivi +des séquences d'émergence historiquement situées, tandis que la matrice +qui suit condense des régimes longs de domination relative, +partiellement chevauchants, afin d'en faire apparaître la logique +structurelle plutôt que d'en reconduire une lecture linéaire. -### **4.6.1 — Cartographie des régimes archicratiques : matrice A–C–A’** +### **4.6.1 — Cartographie des régimes archicratiques : matrice A–C–A'** -L’enjeu n’est pas que classificatoire ; il est aussi heuristique et génétique. L’archicratie ne peut plus être pensée comme un concept figé ni comme une fonction invariante du pouvoir, mais comme une structure évolutive, dont les configurations historiques s’articulent selon trois dimensions fondamentales : l’arcalité, la cratialité et l’archicration proprement dite. +L'enjeu n'est pas que classificatoire ; il est aussi heuristique et +génétique. L'archicratie ne peut plus être pensée comme un concept figé +ni comme une fonction invariante du pouvoir, mais comme une structure +évolutive, dont les configurations historiques s'articulent selon trois +dimensions fondamentales : l'arcalité, la cratialité et l'archicration +proprement dite. -Il ne s’agit pas de répéter ce qui précède, mais d’en recomposer une lecture différentielle à travers la matrice A–C–A’. Cette triple entrée fait apparaître des dynamiques de tension, de déplacement et d’intensification. +Il ne s'agit pas de répéter ce qui précède, mais d'en recomposer une +lecture différentielle à travers la matrice A–C–A'. Cette triple +entrée fait apparaître des dynamiques de tension, de déplacement et +d'intensification. -Cette matrice ne doit pas être lue comme un tableau de successions closes, mais comme un outil de condensation heuristique faisant apparaître, dans la longue durée, des régimes de domination relative aux frontières poreuses, entremêlées et parfois réversibles. +Cette matrice ne doit pas être lue comme un tableau de successions +closes, mais comme un outil de condensation heuristique faisant +apparaître, dans la longue durée, des régimes de domination relative aux +frontières poreuses, entremêlées et parfois réversibles. #### **I. Le régime proto-industriel (env. 1780–1914) — Régulation disciplinaire-visible** -Dans ce premier régime, que l’on peut rattacher à la première révolution industrielle et à la montée du pouvoir disciplinaire (Michel Foucault, *Surveiller et punir*, 1975), l’*arcalité* est *matérielle et visible*. Elle s’incarne dans des formes spatiales localisées : usines, casernes, hospices, prisons, écoles. L’espace est compartimenté, l’ordre est topographié. Les dispositifs de surveillance et de distribution (panoptisme, inspection, quadrillage) constituent les armatures visibles de la régulation. +Dans ce premier régime, que l'on peut rattacher à la première révolution +industrielle et à la montée du pouvoir disciplinaire (Michel Foucault, +*Surveiller et punir*, 1975), l'*arcalité* est *matérielle et visible*. +Elle s'incarne dans des formes spatiales localisées : usines, casernes, +hospices, prisons, écoles. L'espace est compartimenté, l'ordre est +topographié. Les dispositifs de surveillance et de distribution +(panoptisme, inspection, quadrillage) constituent les armatures visibles +de la régulation. -La *cratialité*, quant à elle, repose sur *la force individuelle modulée*, sur l’encadrement corporel, sur la captation directe de la puissance de travail — ce que les manuels de taylorisme naissant désignent déjà comme « *gestion du geste* ». C’est la *cratialité* du muscle, du poste de travail, du temps horlogé. +La *cratialité*, quant à elle, repose sur *la force individuelle +modulée*, sur l'encadrement corporel, sur la captation directe de la +puissance de travail — ce que les manuels de taylorisme naissant +désignent déjà comme « *gestion du geste* ». C'est la *cratialité* du +muscle, du poste de travail, du temps horlogé. -Enfin, l’archicration se donne comme scène explicite : le pouvoir est visible, incarné, hiérarchisé. L’autorité est identifiable, le commandement localisé, et l’épreuve régulatoire vécue comme interpellation directe. +Enfin, l'archicration se donne comme scène explicite : le pouvoir est +visible, incarné, hiérarchisé. L'autorité est identifiable, le +commandement localisé, et l'épreuve régulatoire vécue comme +interpellation directe. -***Matrice A–C–A’* (1780–1914) :** +***Matrice A–C–A'* (1780–1914) :** -*Arcalité* : visible, localisée, spatialisée -*Cratialité* : corporelle, disciplinaire, gestuelle +*Arcalité* : visible, localisée, spatialisée\ +*Cratialité* : corporelle, disciplinaire, gestuelle\ *Archicration* : incarnée, explicite, hiérarchique #### **II. Le régime fordo-planificateur (env. 1918–1973) — Régulation technobureaucratique-planifiée** -Ce régime, forgé dans les feux croisés de la rationalisation fordiste, de la guerre totale et de la reconstruction keynésienne, voit émerger une arcalité infrastructurelle : le monde est désormais *rendu gouvernable par la technique*, les grands réseaux, la standardisation. Le territoire est quadrillé, les flux sont organisés, les unités de mesure universalisées (Alain Supiot, *La gouvernance par les nombres*, 2015). +Ce régime, forgé dans les feux croisés de la rationalisation fordiste, +de la guerre totale et de la reconstruction keynésienne, voit émerger +une arcalité infrastructurelle : le monde est désormais *rendu +gouvernable par la technique*, les grands réseaux, la standardisation. +Le territoire est quadrillé, les flux sont organisés, les unités de +mesure universalisées (Alain Supiot, *La gouvernance par les nombres*, +2015). -La *cratialité* s’institue *sur le mode collectif* : elle mobilise des masses, des corps agrégés, des gestes synchronisés par la division scientifique du travail. Taylorisme et fordisme sont les matrices de cette cratialité systémique, productiviste et fortement encadrée à grande échelle. +La *cratialité* s'institue *sur le mode collectif* : elle mobilise des +masses, des corps agrégés, des gestes synchronisés par la division +scientifique du travail. Taylorisme et fordisme sont les matrices de +cette cratialité systémique, productiviste et fortement encadrée à +grande échelle. -L’archicration devient ici stabilisatrice et concertée : elle repose sur des compromis historiques donnant lieu à des formes de régulation formalisées, visibles et négociées. Le conflit social est reconnu, encadré et régulé par des institutions qui en assurent la visibilité et l’intelligibilité. +L'archicration devient ici stabilisatrice et concertée : elle repose sur +des compromis historiques donnant lieu à des formes de régulation +formalisées, visibles et négociées. Le conflit social est reconnu, +encadré et régulé par des institutions qui en assurent la visibilité et +l'intelligibilité. -*Matrice A–C–A’* (1918–1973) : +*Matrice A–C–A'* (1918–1973) : -*Arcalité* : technobureaucratique, infrastructurelle, standardisée -*Cratialité* : collectivisée, synchronisée, encadrée +*Arcalité* : technobureaucratique, infrastructurelle, standardisée\ +*Cratialité* : collectivisée, synchronisée, encadrée\ *Archicration* : institutionnalisée, délibérée, stabilisatrice #### **III. Le régime néolibéral-cybernétique (env. 1973–2010) — Régulation algorithmique-distribuée** -Ce régime est marqué par un basculement fondamental : l’*arcalité* devient *systémique*, *imbriquée, réticulaire et structurée par des protocoles*. La régulation se fait par boucles de rétroactions (*feedback*), par traitement de signaux, par circulation d’informations entre entités autonomisées. Ce que Norbert Wiener avait théorisé dès 1948 dans *Cybernetics* se réalise dans les réseaux de données, les dispositifs logistiques, les systèmes de gestion automatisée. +Ce régime est marqué par un basculement fondamental : l'*arcalité* +devient *systémique*, *imbriquée, réticulaire et structurée par des +protocoles*. La régulation se fait par boucles de rétroactions +(*feedback*), par traitement de signaux, par circulation d'informations +entre entités autonomisées. Ce que Norbert Wiener avait théorisé dès +1948 dans *Cybernetics* se réalise dans les réseaux de données, les +dispositifs logistiques, les systèmes de gestion automatisée. -La *cratialité*, ici, se loge dans le *signal*. Elle cesse d’être l’activation d’un corps ou la mobilisation d’une masse : elle devient *extraction de flux*, *analyse de comportements*, *modulation d’indicateurs*. Le pouvoir est prédictif, probabiliste, inférentiel. Le toyotisme, les KPIs, les benchmarks en sont les opérateurs paradigmatiques. +La *cratialité*, ici, se loge dans le *signal*. Elle cesse d'être +l'activation d'un corps ou la mobilisation d'une masse : elle devient +*extraction de flux*, *analyse de comportements*, *modulation +d'indicateurs*. Le pouvoir est prédictif, probabiliste, inférentiel. Le +toyotisme, les KPIs, les benchmarks en sont les opérateurs +paradigmatiques. -L’archicration se disperse et s’efface. Le pouvoir se loge dans les interfaces, les algorithmes et les conventions techniques. La scène régulatrice se retire derrière les infrastructures : elle devient gouvernance à garant affaibli, gestion dépolitisée, régulation sans représentation forte. +L'archicration se disperse et s'efface. Le pouvoir se loge dans les +interfaces, les algorithmes et les conventions techniques. La scène +régulatrice se retire derrière les infrastructures : elle devient +gouvernance à garant affaibli, gestion dépolitisée, régulation sans +représentation forte. -*Matrice A–C–A’* (1973–2010) : +*Matrice A–C–A'* (1973–2010) : -> *Arcalité* : réticulaire, systémique, logique -> *Cratialité* : signalétique, inférentielle, informationnelle -> *Archicration* : oblitérée, automatisée, dépolitisée +*Arcalité* : réticulaire, systémique, logique\ +*Cratialité* : signalétique, inférentielle, informationnelle\ +*Archicration* : oblitérée, automatisée, dépolitisée #### **IV. Le régime algorithmique-oblitérant (env. 2010–2025) — Régulation prédictive-effacée** -Dans ce régime contemporain, l’*arcalité* atteint un *niveau d’invisibilité maximal* : elle est disséminée dans les *architectures numériques mondiales*, dans les *standards techniques*, dans les *protocoles codés* qui opèrent à l’insu de leurs usagers. Les data centers, les API, les plateformes, les SDK forment l’ossature d’un monde dont la régulation est architecturale, codée, inapparente. +Dans ce régime contemporain, l'*arcalité* atteint un *niveau +d'invisibilité maximal* : elle est disséminée dans les *architectures +numériques mondiales*, dans les *standards techniques*, dans les +*protocoles codés* qui opèrent à l'insu de leurs usagers. Les data +centers, les API, les plateformes, les SDK forment l'ossature d'un monde +dont la régulation est architecturale, codée, inapparente. -La *cratialité*, elle, devient *anticipatoire*. *Elle vise à prédire, pré-corriger, ajuster en amont les comportements*. Elle agit non sur l’action, mais sur les conditions de son émergence. L’IA comportementale, le scoring algorithmique, les nudges numériques sont ses figures les plus achevées. +La *cratialité*, elle, devient *anticipatoire*. *Elle vise à prédire, +pré-corriger, ajuster en amont les comportements*. Elle agit non sur +l'action, mais sur les conditions de son émergence. L'IA +comportementale, le scoring algorithmique, les nudges numériques sont +ses figures les plus achevées. -Dans cette configuration, l’archicration tend à l’oblitération : la scène régulatrice s’efface, le conflit devient de moins en moins représentable, l’épreuve de moins en moins négociable. La norme n’est plus énoncée : elle est encodée. Le sujet n’est plus tant interpellé que filtré, mesuré, noté et profilé. +Dans cette configuration, l'archicration tend à l'oblitération : la +scène régulatrice s'efface, le conflit devient de moins en moins +représentable, l'épreuve de moins en moins négociable. La norme n'est +plus énoncée : elle est encodée. Le sujet n'est plus tant interpellé que +filtré, mesuré, noté et profilé. -***Matrice A–C–A’* (2010–2025) :** +***Matrice A–C–A'* (2010–2025) :** -> *Arcalité* : invisible, architecturale, codée -> *Cratialité* : prédictive, comportementale, probabiliste -> *Archicration* : effacée, désincarnée, silencieuse +*Arcalité* : invisible, architecturale, codée\ +*Cratialité* : prédictive, comportementale, probabiliste\ +*Archicration* : effacée, désincarnée, silencieuse -Cette matrice dynamique A–C–A’ constitue le socle de la section suivante. Elle rend possible une lecture en écarts, tensions et basculements. Ce qu’elle fait émerger, au-delà des différences, c’est une tendance historique à l’effacement : à mesure que les régimes se perfectionnent techniquement, la scène du pouvoir se dérobe et s’automatise. C’est là le seuil critique à partir duquel peut être pensée l’hypothèse d’un retournement conscient. +Cette matrice dynamique A–C–A' constitue le socle de la section +suivante. Elle rend possible une lecture en écarts, tensions et +basculements. Ce qu'elle fait émerger, au-delà des différences, c'est +une tendance historique à l'effacement : à mesure que les régimes se +perfectionnent techniquement, la scène du pouvoir se dérobe et +s'automatise. C'est là le seuil critique à partir duquel peut être +pensée l'hypothèse d'un retournement conscient. -### **4.6.2 — Tensions, bifurcations, seuils d’instabilité : pour une trialectique régulatoire** +### **4.6.2 — Tensions, bifurcations, seuils d'instabilité : pour une trialectique régulatoire** -Il ne suffit pas d’identifier des séquences historiques ; il faut comprendre ce qui, dans chaque régime, excède ses propres dispositifs et désarticule ses structures de légitimation. Ce que nous appelons ici bifurcation n’est ni un tournant linéaire ni un simple glissement conjoncturel, mais un moment d’instabilité où la triade arcalité–cratialité–archicration se déséquilibre au point de rendre le régime intenable sans reconfiguration. Il s’agit donc de construire une lecture triadique des crises de la régulation, non comme simple succession, mais comme épuisement de ses modèles. +Il ne suffit pas d'identifier des séquences historiques ; il faut +comprendre ce qui, dans chaque régime, excède ses propres dispositifs et +désarticule ses structures de légitimation. Ce que nous appelons ici +bifurcation n'est ni un tournant linéaire ni un simple glissement +conjoncturel, mais un moment d'instabilité où la triade +arcalité–cratialité–archicration se déséquilibre au point de rendre le +régime intenable sans reconfiguration. Il s'agit donc de construire une +lecture triadique des crises de la régulation, non comme simple +succession, mais comme épuisement de ses modèles. #### La crise de 1929 comme seuil de disqualification du régime manchestérien -La première grande dislocation régulatoire du XXe siècle intervient lorsque éclatent à la fois la financiarisation spéculative (crash de Wall Street, octobre 1929) et l’incapacité structurelle du régime libéral à protéger les masses du désastre économique. L’arcalité manchestérienne, fondée sur la liberté contractuelle, la non-intervention étatique, la fluidité des échanges et la sacralité du marché, révèle son impuissance à structurer une réponse systémique à l’effondrement. La cratialité individualisante — pilier du régime industriel initial — se heurte à la dévastation de millions de vies rendues superflues. Quant à l’archicration, elle devient fantomatique : plus aucun acteur politique ne semble capable d’incarner, d’organiser, ni même de représenter la régulation. +La première grande dislocation régulatoire du XXe siècle intervient +lorsque éclatent à la fois la financiarisation spéculative (crash de +Wall Street, octobre 1929) et l'incapacité structurelle du régime +libéral à protéger les masses du désastre économique. L'arcalité +manchestérienne, fondée sur la liberté contractuelle, la +non-intervention étatique, la fluidité des échanges et la sacralité du +marché, révèle son impuissance à structurer une réponse systémique à +l'effondrement. La cratialité individualisante — pilier du régime +industriel initial — se heurte à la dévastation de millions de vies +rendues superflues. Quant à l'archicration, elle devient fantomatique : +plus aucun acteur politique ne semble capable d'incarner, d'organiser, +ni même de représenter la régulation. -Ce point d’effondrement produit un double basculement. D’une part, il ouvre la voie à un nouveau régime de régulation : le fordisme keynésien, qui articule infrastructure planifiée, mobilisation collective organisée (par le salariat, le syndicat, l’État) et légitimation par la redistribution. D’autre part, il manifeste la nécessité d’une scène archicratique visible, incarnée, assumée, capable de répondre au chaos par l’organisation. Le New Deal de Roosevelt aux États-Unis, les plans quinquennaux soviétiques, la montée des fascismes productivistes en Europe constituent autant de formes divergentes, mais homogènes dans leur volonté d’instaurer une régulation par le haut, face au désordre. +Ce point d'effondrement produit un double basculement. D'une part, il +ouvre la voie à un nouveau régime de régulation : le fordisme keynésien, +qui articule infrastructure planifiée, mobilisation collective organisée +(par le salariat, le syndicat, l'État) et légitimation par la +redistribution. D'autre part, il manifeste la nécessité d'une scène +archicratique visible, incarnée, assumée, capable de répondre au chaos +par l'organisation. Le New Deal de Roosevelt aux États-Unis, les plans +quinquennaux soviétiques, la montée des fascismes productivistes en +Europe constituent autant de formes divergentes, mais homogènes dans +leur volonté d'instaurer une régulation par le haut, face au désordre. -La crise de 1929 n’est donc pas seulement un événement économique. Elle est une crise de légitimité régulatrice : dissociation entre l’instance supposée gouverner et l’épreuve réelle du chaos vécu. Elle constitue l’un des prototypes modernes de la bifurcation archicratique. +La crise de 1929 n'est donc pas seulement un événement économique. Elle +est une crise de légitimité régulatrice : dissociation entre l'instance +supposée gouverner et l'épreuve réelle du chaos vécu. Elle constitue +l'un des prototypes modernes de la bifurcation archicratique. #### Les années 1970 comme bascule néolibérale : surcharge régulatoire et retour stratégique du marché -Quarante ans plus tard, un nouveau point de rupture s’installe. Cette fois, ce n’est pas un défaut de régulation, mais *une saturation régulatoire* qui produit l’instabilité. L’arcalité infrastructurelle et l’archicration planificatrice, mises en place dans les Trente Glorieuses, apparaissent — entre 1968 et 1973 — comme rigides, opaques, inefficaces, obsolètes. La crise pétrolière (1973), la stagflation, la contestation sociale radicale (Mai 68, Black Panthers, féminismes, luttes anticoloniales), la crise fiscale de l’État providence, la montée de l’informatisation forment un faisceau de tensions que les régimes keynésiens ne parviennent plus à intégrer. +Quarante ans plus tard, un nouveau point de rupture s'installe. Cette +fois, ce n'est pas un défaut de régulation, mais *une saturation +régulatoire* qui produit l'instabilité. L'arcalité infrastructurelle et +l'archicration planificatrice, mises en place dans les Trente +Glorieuses, apparaissent — entre 1968 et 1973 — comme rigides, +opaques, inefficaces, obsolètes. La crise pétrolière (1973), la +stagflation, la contestation sociale radicale (Mai 68, Black Panthers, +féminismes, luttes anticoloniales), la crise fiscale de l'État +providence, la montée de l'informatisation forment un faisceau de +tensions que les régimes keynésiens ne parviennent plus à intégrer. -Le tournant néolibéral s’installe précisément comme *réponse stratégique à cette crise de sur-régulation*. Il délègue la régulation aux marchés, privatise les infrastructures, redéfinit l’État comme garant de la concurrence et non plus comme organisateur du compromis. Ce n’est plus l’utopie du progrès collectif qui organise le réel, mais l’efficience calculée, l’ajustement concurrentiel, l’optimisation en flux tendus. La cratialité devient informationnelle ; l’arcalité devient systémique ; l’archicration s’efface derrière des indicateurs, des normes ISO, des indices de performance, des interfaces sans visage. +Le tournant néolibéral s'installe précisément comme *réponse stratégique +à cette crise de sur-régulation*. Il délègue la régulation aux marchés, +privatise les infrastructures, redéfinit l'État comme garant de la +concurrence et non plus comme organisateur du compromis. Ce n'est plus +l'utopie du progrès collectif qui organise le réel, mais l'efficience +calculée, l'ajustement concurrentiel, l'optimisation en flux tendus. La +cratialité devient informationnelle ; l'arcalité devient systémique ; +l'archicration s'efface derrière des indicateurs, des normes ISO, des +indices de performance, des interfaces sans visage. -Ce moment n’est pas un retour au libéralisme classique, mais une mutation fondamentale. La scène régulatoire tend à devenir post-politique : dépolitisée, intermédiée par des inférences, de plus en plus automatisée. Le marché est alors pensé comme dispositif supérieur de traitement de l’information dispersée, et cette hypothèse se trouve relayée par l’algorithmisation de la gouvernance. Il s’agit moins d’une crise ponctuelle que d’un reparamétrage complet de la régulation — au prix d’un retrait marqué de la scène archicratique. +Ce moment n'est pas un retour au libéralisme classique, mais une +mutation fondamentale. La scène régulatoire tend à devenir +post-politique : dépolitisée, intermédiée par des inférences, de plus en +plus automatisée. Le marché est alors pensé comme dispositif supérieur +de traitement de l'information dispersée, et cette hypothèse se trouve +relayée par l'algorithmisation de la gouvernance. Il s'agit moins d'une +crise ponctuelle que d'un reparamétrage complet de la régulation — au +prix d'un retrait marqué de la scène archicratique. -#### Crise post-2008 et effondrement différé du régime néolibéral : vers l’archicration oblitérée +#### Crise post-2008 et effondrement différé du régime néolibéral : vers l'archicration oblitérée -La dernière grande inflexion, celle que nous vivons encore, prend sa source dans la crise financière globale de 2008. La bulle spéculative des subprimes, l’effondrement de Lehman Brothers, les plans de sauvetage massifs et la reprise de la planche à billets (quantitative easing) exposent au grand jour les fragilités du système néolibéral. Pourtant, cette fois-ci, aucun régime alternatif ne parvient à s’imposer. L’État revient brièvement comme agent de stabilisation, mais il ne propose plus d’architecture régulatrice substantielle. Il n’y a plus de New Deal. Plus de grand récit. Plus d’utopie fédératrice. +La dernière grande inflexion, celle que nous vivons encore, prend sa +source dans la crise financière globale de 2008. La bulle spéculative +des subprimes, l'effondrement de Lehman Brothers, les plans de sauvetage +massifs et la reprise de la planche à billets (quantitative easing) +exposent au grand jour les fragilités du système néolibéral. Pourtant, +cette fois-ci, aucun régime alternatif ne parvient à s'imposer. L'État +revient brièvement comme agent de stabilisation, mais il ne propose plus +d'architecture régulatrice substantielle. Il n'y a plus de New Deal. +Plus de grand récit. Plus d'utopie fédératrice. -C’est ici que s’installe ce que nous avons nommé, dans tout le chapitre 4.5, l’archicration oblitérée. La scène de régulation n’est pas abolie : elle est dissimulée. Elle s’automatise, s’encapsule, se déterritorialise dans les data centers, les architectures de cloud, les IA prédictives, les nudges comportementaux, les plateformes souveraines. La régulation s’effectue, mais *hors de toute scène identifiable, discutable ou incarnée*. +C'est ici que s'installe ce que nous avons nommé, dans tout le chapitre +4.5, l'archicration oblitérée. La scène de régulation n'est pas abolie : +elle est dissimulée. Elle s'automatise, s'encapsule, se déterritorialise +dans les data centers, les architectures de cloud, les IA prédictives, +les nudges comportementaux, les plateformes souveraines. La régulation +s'effectue, mais *hors de toute scène identifiable, discutable ou +incarnée*. -Cette configuration repose sur un triple effacement : celui de la légitimité explicite, de la souveraineté politique et de la conflictualité reconnue. L’arcalité devient invisible, la cratialité anticipatoire, l’archicration tend à la dissolution scénique. Ce régime n’est pas seulement performant ; il est aussi plus dangereux, parce qu’il rend la critique moins audible et la reconfiguration politique plus problématique. +Cette configuration repose sur un triple effacement : celui de la +légitimité explicite, de la souveraineté politique et de la +conflictualité reconnue. L'arcalité devient invisible, la cratialité +anticipatoire, l'archicration tend à la dissolution scénique. Ce régime +n'est pas seulement performant ; il est aussi plus dangereux, parce +qu'il rend la critique moins audible et la reconfiguration politique +plus problématique. -À travers ces trois seuils d’instabilité — 1929, 1973, 2008 — se dessine ainsi une logique plus profonde que celle d’une simple succession : la logique des bifurcations archicratiques. Chaque régime se défait moins sous l’effet de ses ennemis extérieurs que sous celui de ses contradictions internes. C’est cette structure qu’il faut maintenant rendre pleinement opératoire pour penser la possibilité d’un cinquième régime régulatoire, conscient, exposé et institué comme scène archicratique ouverte. +À travers ces trois seuils d'instabilité — 1929, 1973, 2008 — se +dessine ainsi une logique plus profonde que celle d'une simple +succession : la logique des bifurcations archicratiques. Chaque régime +se défait moins sous l'effet de ses ennemis extérieurs que sous celui de +ses contradictions internes. C'est cette structure qu'il faut maintenant +rendre pleinement opératoire pour penser la possibilité d'un cinquième +régime régulatoire, conscient, exposé et institué comme scène +archicratique ouverte. -### **4.6.3 — Critique de la régulation automatisée : du fantasme d’auto-pilotage à la décomposition de la scène politique** +### **4.6.3 — Critique de la régulation automatisée : du fantasme d'auto-pilotage à la décomposition de la scène politique** -Ce que la quatrième configuration archicratique porte à son point d’intensité maximal, c’est moins une stabilisation efficiente du monde par la technologie qu’un fantasme de pilotage automatique de la régulation : celui selon lequel un monde complexe pourrait être gouverné sans sujet clairement responsable, sans instance tierce pleinement assumée, sans conflit structurant ni scène institutionnelle forte. L’illusion n’est pas tant celle d’une surpuissance technique que celle d’une autorégulation sans scène. C’est cette croyance dans un auto-équilibrage algorithmique du social qui manifeste aujourd’hui ses effets les plus problématiques : fragilité structurelle, défaillance systémique, dissimulation des conséquences écologiques, dépolitisation et oblitération du dissensus. +Ce que la quatrième configuration archicratique porte à son point +d'intensité maximal, c'est moins une stabilisation efficiente du monde +par la technologie qu'un fantasme de pilotage automatique de la +régulation : celui selon lequel un monde complexe pourrait être gouverné +sans sujet clairement responsable, sans instance tierce pleinement +assumée, sans conflit structurant ni scène institutionnelle forte. +L'illusion n'est pas tant celle d'une surpuissance technique que celle +d'une autorégulation sans scène. C'est cette croyance dans un +auto-équilibrage algorithmique du social qui manifeste aujourd'hui ses +effets les plus problématiques : fragilité structurelle, défaillance +systémique, dissimulation des conséquences écologiques, dépolitisation +et oblitération du dissensus. -En premier lieu, cette illusion cybernétique repose sur une foi aveugle dans la maîtrise de la complexité par la complexification des dispositifs eux-mêmes. Plus les systèmes deviennent denses, interconnectés, enchevêtrés, plus leur pilotage est transféré à des modules automatiques censés absorber les déviations en temps réel. Or, comme l’a montré Charles Perrow, les systèmes les plus intégrés et les plus étroitement couplés sont aussi ceux qui génèrent les risques les plus difficilement maîtrisables. Ce que la logique cybernétique présente comme robustesse — l’auto-correction par feedback — peut alors devenir source d’instabilité cumulative : plus le système corrige, plus il multiplie des ajustements produisant des effets secondaires non anticipés. Le flash crash du 6 mai 2010 en a fourni une illustration manifeste. +En premier lieu, cette illusion cybernétique repose sur une foi aveugle +dans la maîtrise de la complexité par la complexification des +dispositifs eux-mêmes. Plus les systèmes deviennent denses, +interconnectés, enchevêtrés, plus leur pilotage est transféré à des +modules automatiques censés absorber les déviations en temps réel. Or, +comme l'a montré Charles Perrow, les systèmes les plus intégrés et les +plus étroitement couplés sont aussi ceux qui génèrent les risques les +plus difficilement maîtrisables. Ce que la logique cybernétique présente +comme robustesse — l'auto-correction par feedback — peut alors +devenir source d'instabilité cumulative : plus le système corrige, plus +il multiplie des ajustements produisant des effets secondaires non +anticipés. Le flash crash du 6 mai 2010 en a fourni une illustration +manifeste. -Mais la critique ne peut s’arrêter à ce constat de vulnérabilité technique. Il faut aller plus profondément, en interrogeant le socle épistémologique de ce mode de régulation : son rapport à la normativité, à la médiation et à la conflictualité. Comme l’ont montré Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns dans *Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation* (2013), l’une des caractéristiques majeures du pouvoir algorithmique réside dans l’effondrement des médiations interprétatives. Là où le droit, le langage, le débat public, le récit historique produisaient un espace de traduction et de mise en discussion des normes, l’algorithme opère par extraction directe de régularités, par induction de comportements types et par modélisation préemptive des conduites. Il n’y a plus de règles énoncées, mais des régularités corrélationnelles ; plus de subjectivité délibérante, mais une architecture préfigurative de l’action. L’archicration s’automatise non seulement dans ses effets, mais dans ses conditions de possibilité : elle se produit *sans épreuve*, sans explicitation, sans conflictualité, sans reconnaissance du désaccord. C’est en ce sens qu’elle oblitère la scène politique — non en supprimant toute décision, mais en empêchant que celle-ci puisse être visible comme telle. +Mais la critique ne peut s'arrêter à ce constat de vulnérabilité +technique. Il faut aller plus profondément, en interrogeant le socle +épistémologique de ce mode de régulation : son rapport à la normativité, +à la médiation et à la conflictualité. Comme l'ont montré Antoinette +Rouvroy et Thomas Berns dans *Gouvernementalité algorithmique et +perspectives d'émancipation* (2013), l'une des caractéristiques majeures +du pouvoir algorithmique réside dans l'effondrement des médiations +interprétatives. Là où le droit, le langage, le débat public, le récit +historique produisaient un espace de traduction et de mise en discussion +des normes, l'algorithme opère par extraction directe de régularités, +par induction de comportements types et par modélisation préemptive des +conduites. Il n'y a plus de règles énoncées, mais des régularités +corrélationnelles ; plus de subjectivité délibérante, mais une +architecture préfigurative de l'action. L'archicration s'automatise non +seulement dans ses effets, mais dans ses conditions de possibilité : +elle se produit *sans épreuve*, sans explicitation, sans conflictualité, +sans reconnaissance du désaccord. C'est en ce sens qu'elle oblitère la +scène politique — non en supprimant toute décision, mais en empêchant +que celle-ci puisse être visible comme telle. -Cette critique devient plus radicale encore lorsqu’on examine l’incapacité de cette régulation automatisée à intégrer l’altérité, la dissonance et la voix située. Les systèmes de prédiction comportementale — qu’ils s’appliquent aux parcours professionnels, aux risques de récidive, aux allocations sociales ou aux suggestions publicitaires — n’intègrent pas les subjectivités dans leur singularité, mais les reconfigurent en profils agrégés, en variables corrélées, en flux quantifiables. Virginia Eubanks, dans *Automating Inequality* (2018), a magistralement montré comment ces dispositifs — prétendument neutres — reproduisent et renforcent les discriminations structurelles, en invisibilisant les conditions concrètes d’existence des plus vulnérables. De la même manière, Cathy O’Neil dans *Weapons of Math Destruction* (2016) démontre que la prétendue objectivité mathématique de ces modèles masque en réalité une violence politique sourde, précisément parce qu’elle est dissimulée derrière le langage du code et des corrélations. +Cette critique devient plus radicale encore lorsqu'on examine +l'incapacité de cette régulation automatisée à intégrer l'altérité, la +dissonance et la voix située. Les systèmes de prédiction comportementale — qu'ils s'appliquent aux parcours professionnels, aux risques de +récidive, aux allocations sociales ou aux suggestions publicitaires — n'intègrent pas les subjectivités dans leur singularité, mais les +reconfigurent en profils agrégés, en variables corrélées, en flux +quantifiables. Virginia Eubanks, dans *Automating Inequality* (2018), a +magistralement montré comment ces dispositifs — prétendument neutres — reproduisent et renforcent les discriminations structurelles, en +invisibilisant les conditions concrètes d'existence des plus +vulnérables. De la même manière, Cathy O'Neil dans *Weapons of Math +Destruction* (2016) démontre que la prétendue objectivité mathématique +de ces modèles masque en réalité une violence politique sourde, +précisément parce qu'elle est dissimulée derrière le langage du code et +des corrélations. -Il faut alors prendre au sérieux la nécessité d’une critique de l’intelligence artificielle elle-même, non comme simple technologie, mais comme dispositif susceptible de reproduire l’effacement des épreuves, l’élimination du dissensus et la reconduction de normes dominantes sous couvert d’optimisation. L’enjeu est de la penser non comme instance d’extériorité surplombante, mais comme outil devant demeurer situé, contestable et réinscrit dans une scène de savoir partagée. Ce renversement est à la fois éthique, épistémologique et politique. +Il faut alors prendre au sérieux la nécessité d'une critique de +l'intelligence artificielle elle-même, non comme simple technologie, +mais comme dispositif susceptible de reproduire l'effacement des +épreuves, l'élimination du dissensus et la reconduction de normes +dominantes sous couvert d'optimisation. L'enjeu est de la penser non +comme instance d'extériorité surplombante, mais comme outil devant +demeurer situé, contestable et réinscrit dans une scène de savoir +partagée. Ce renversement est à la fois éthique, épistémologique et +politique. -La critique de la régulation automatisée prend ainsi la forme d’une critique du fantasme technocratique lui-même. Toute prétention à l’auto-régulation pure et à l’efficience sans médiation appauvrit la démocratie comme scène agonistique de vérité. Le dépassement de ce modèle ne viendra donc ni de sa perfection technique ni de sa généralisation, mais de sa remise en tension critique par des voix, des récits, des expériences et des formes instituantes de dissensus. +La critique de la régulation automatisée prend ainsi la forme d'une +critique du fantasme technocratique lui-même. Toute prétention à +l'auto-régulation pure et à l'efficience sans médiation appauvrit la +démocratie comme scène agonistique de vérité. Le dépassement de ce +modèle ne viendra donc ni de sa perfection technique ni de sa +généralisation, mais de sa remise en tension critique par des voix, des +récits, des expériences et des formes instituantes de dissensus. #### Le fantasme de clôture régulatrice : le post-politique comme archicration terminale -Le cœur de ce que nous désignons ici comme la phase terminale de l’archicration oblitérée réside dans un fantasme contemporain de clôture de la régulation : non plus seulement l’ambition d’efficacité ou d’objectivité, mais la tentative de supprimer l’ouverture même du politique. Ce n’est plus seulement l’autoritarisme qui menace, mais l’effacement de la scène politique par saturation gestionnaire, automatisation normative et réduction probabiliste de l’avenir. +Le cœur de ce que nous désignons ici comme la phase terminale de +l'archicration oblitérée réside dans un fantasme contemporain de clôture +de la régulation : non plus seulement l'ambition d'efficacité ou +d'objectivité, mais la tentative de supprimer l'ouverture même du +politique. Ce n'est plus seulement l'autoritarisme qui menace, mais +l'effacement de la scène politique par saturation gestionnaire, +automatisation normative et réduction probabiliste de l'avenir. -La régulation automatisée contemporaine, sous l’égide des interfaces algorithmiques, s’institue comme un dispositif de *neutralisation active du dissensus*. Elle substitue à la délibération une logique de traitement de flux ; elle remplace la décision par la préemption ; elle écarte la parole au profit de la corrélation. Dans un tel système, l’histoire n’a plus lieu, ou plus exactement : elle est désactivée comme événement. Tout est devenu *output*, *data point*, *profilage en ligne*, *retour d'expérience à optimiser*. Or ce que Claude Lefort avait magistralement analysé dans *L’invention démocratique* (1981) comme « le lieu vide du pouvoir » — cette vacance symbolique par laquelle le pouvoir reste contestable, renouvelable, délibérable — est précisément ce que l’archicration automatisée s’efforce d’éradiquer. +La régulation automatisée contemporaine, sous l'égide des interfaces +algorithmiques, s'institue comme un dispositif de *neutralisation active +du dissensus*. Elle substitue à la délibération une logique de +traitement de flux ; elle remplace la décision par la préemption ; elle +écarte la parole au profit de la corrélation. Dans un tel système, +l'histoire n'a plus lieu, ou plus exactement : elle est désactivée comme +événement. Tout est devenu *output*, *data point*, *profilage en ligne*, +*retour d'expérience à optimiser*. Or ce que Claude Lefort avait +magistralement analysé dans *L'invention démocratique* (1981) comme « le +lieu vide du pouvoir » — cette vacance symbolique par laquelle le +pouvoir reste contestable, renouvelable, délibérable — est précisément +ce que l'archicration automatisée s'efforce d'éradiquer. -Ce qui est évacué, dans cette clôture régulatoire, ce n’est donc pas seulement le droit de contester, mais la structure même du conflit comme moteur du politique. L’événement, la rupture, le surgissement d’un impensé sont désormais recodés comme *bugs*, comme *bruits statistiques*, comme *outliers*. Ce que le système tolère, ce n’est pas l’hétérogénéité mais seulement la variance contrôlée. Et lorsque cette variance dépasse les bornes calculées, le système tend à la *traiter*, non à l’*entendre*. La contradiction devient *anomalie à éliminer* plutôt que *tension à interpréter*. +Ce qui est évacué, dans cette clôture régulatoire, ce n'est donc pas +seulement le droit de contester, mais la structure même du conflit comme +moteur du politique. L'événement, la rupture, le surgissement d'un +impensé sont désormais recodés comme *bugs*, comme *bruits +statistiques*, comme *outliers*. Ce que le système tolère, ce n'est pas +l'hétérogénéité mais seulement la variance contrôlée. Et lorsque cette +variance dépasse les bornes calculées, le système tend à la *traiter*, +non à l'*entendre*. La contradiction devient *anomalie à éliminer* +plutôt que *tension à interpréter*. -Le paradigme du post-politique décrit précisément cette opération de disqualification de l’irruption dissensuelle. Ce qui est alors nié, ce n’est pas seulement le pluralisme d’opinion, mais la capacité même des sujets à instituer des scènes de visibilité pour leurs expériences. Toute interrogation sur le pouvoir tend à être recodée en problème d’efficience, de calibration ou de performance. +Le paradigme du post-politique décrit précisément cette opération de +disqualification de l'irruption dissensuelle. Ce qui est alors nié, ce +n'est pas seulement le pluralisme d'opinion, mais la capacité même des +sujets à instituer des scènes de visibilité pour leurs expériences. +Toute interrogation sur le pouvoir tend à être recodée en problème +d'efficience, de calibration ou de performance. -Ce basculement constitue, dans la logique même de notre essai-thèse, le stade terminal de l’archicration oblitérée : un régime où non seulement la régulation ne s’expose plus, mais où la scène régulatrice elle-même est supprimée, absorbée dans un réseau de prescriptions techniques non-discutées. Ce n’est plus l’injustice qui est à craindre, mais l’impossibilité même d’en faire l’expérience comme injustice, tant l’événement est préempté, anticipé, encapsulé dans des modèles prédictifs qui dissolvent tout surgissement. +Ce basculement constitue, dans la logique même de notre essai-thèse, le +stade terminal de l'archicration oblitérée : un régime où non seulement +la régulation ne s'expose plus, mais où la scène régulatrice elle-même +est supprimée, absorbée dans un réseau de prescriptions techniques +non-discutées. Ce n'est plus l'injustice qui est à craindre, mais +l'impossibilité même d'en faire l'expérience comme injustice, tant +l'événement est préempté, anticipé, encapsulé dans des modèles +prédictifs qui dissolvent tout surgissement. -Le fantasme de clôture régulatoire est donc bien plus qu’un excès technique : c’est un acte fondamentalement anti-politique, par lequel la conflictualité humaine est désactivée comme source de régulation. Ce n’est pas un dépassement du politique, mais son expulsion silencieuse, son désarmement discursif, son évaporation par technicisation. +Le fantasme de clôture régulatoire est donc bien plus qu'un excès +technique : c'est un acte fondamentalement anti-politique, par lequel la +conflictualité humaine est désactivée comme source de régulation. Ce +n'est pas un dépassement du politique, mais son expulsion silencieuse, +son désarmement discursif, son évaporation par technicisation. -Dans cette situation extrême, l’archicration tend à devenir tautologique : elle ne vise plus tant à réguler le commun qu’à reproduire les conditions de sa propre invisibilité. C’est ce que nous nommons ici archicration terminale : un mode de régulation qui tend à se légitimer par sa seule capacité à fonctionner, anticiper et optimiser, sans rendre visible la scène sur laquelle ces opérations s’exercent. +Dans cette situation extrême, l'archicration tend à devenir tautologique +: elle ne vise plus tant à réguler le commun qu'à reproduire les +conditions de sa propre invisibilité. C'est ce que nous nommons ici +archicration terminale : un mode de régulation qui tend à se légitimer +par sa seule capacité à fonctionner, anticiper et optimiser, sans rendre +visible la scène sur laquelle ces opérations s'exercent. -#### **Régulation sans subjectivation : l’anesthésie normative comme pathologie de l’archicration** +#### **Régulation sans subjectivation : l'anesthésie normative comme pathologie de l'archicration** -Le second symptôme majeur de l’archicration terminale réside dans l’émergence d’une régulation qui tend moins à produire des sujets qu’à calibrer des comportements. Là où les régimes précédents de l’archicration, qu’ils soient disciplinaires, contractuels ou même anticipatoires, incorporaient encore une forme d’interpellation du sujet (fût-elle autoritaire, disciplinaire ou prescriptive), le régime oblitéré se distingue par un décrochage radical entre régulation et subjectivation. La norme n’est plus un cadre d’appel, une injonction adressée à une conscience, mais une matrice silencieuse d’agencements techniques opérant en deçà du langage, du débat, de la reconnaissance. C’est ce que nous nommons ici *anesthésie normative*. +Le second symptôme majeur de l'archicration terminale réside dans +l'émergence d'une régulation qui tend moins à produire des sujets qu'à +calibrer des comportements. Là où les régimes précédents de +l'archicration, qu'ils soient disciplinaires, contractuels ou même +anticipatoires, incorporaient encore une forme d'interpellation du sujet +(fût-elle autoritaire, disciplinaire ou prescriptive), le régime +oblitéré se distingue par un décrochage radical entre régulation et +subjectivation. La norme n'est plus un cadre d'appel, une injonction +adressée à une conscience, mais une matrice silencieuse d'agencements +techniques opérant en deçà du langage, du débat, de la reconnaissance. +C'est ce que nous nommons ici *anesthésie normative*. -Cette notion ne désigne pas simplement une neutralité apparente ou une faible visibilité du conflit, mais une pathologie politique : un régime dans lequel la possibilité de se vivre comme sujet régulé, et de contester cette régulation, tend à s’éteindre. Le paradigme algorithmique et l’abstraction computationnelle produisent des effets normatifs massifs sans jamais les assumer en tant que tels. Il ne s’agit plus de dire ce que les sujets doivent faire, mais de créer les conditions pour qu’ils n’aient plus à choisir. C’est là que réside le basculement : dans cette substitution de la volonté par l’environnement, du discours par l’incitation, du conflit par la captation. +Cette notion ne désigne pas simplement une neutralité apparente ou une +faible visibilité du conflit, mais une pathologie politique : un régime +dans lequel la possibilité de se vivre comme sujet régulé, et de +contester cette régulation, tend à s'éteindre. Le paradigme +algorithmique et l'abstraction computationnelle produisent des effets +normatifs massifs sans jamais les assumer en tant que tels. Il ne s'agit +plus de dire ce que les sujets doivent faire, mais de créer les +conditions pour qu'ils n'aient plus à choisir. C'est là que réside le +basculement : dans cette substitution de la volonté par l'environnement, +du discours par l'incitation, du conflit par la captation. -Le philosophe italien Paolo Virno avait déjà pressenti, dans *Grammaire de la multitude* (2002), que la postmodernité n’allait pas s’accompagner d’une désinstitutionnalisation du pouvoir, mais d’une *immanence opaque*, d’une régulation sans extériorité. L’individu contemporain n’est pas simplement rendu plus libre ; il tend aussi à être privé des points d’appui de sa capacité de jugement. Exposé à des régimes d’ajustement permanents et de moins en moins adossé à des interlocuteurs politiques identifiables, il peut entrer dans un processus de désindividuation au sens fort. +Le philosophe italien Paolo Virno avait déjà pressenti, dans *Grammaire +de la multitude* (2002), que la postmodernité n'allait pas s'accompagner +d'une désinstitutionnalisation du pouvoir, mais d'une *immanence +opaque*, d'une régulation sans extériorité. L'individu contemporain +n'est pas simplement rendu plus libre ; il tend aussi à être privé des +points d'appui de sa capacité de jugement. Exposé à des régimes +d'ajustement permanents et de moins en moins adossé à des interlocuteurs +politiques identifiables, il peut entrer dans un processus de +désindividuation au sens fort. -L’anesthésie normative prend alors plusieurs formes : réduction de la norme à la donnée, effacement du seuil critique dans les processus décisionnels, incorporation inconsciente des logiques d’optimisation. Ce que les chercheurs Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns ont magistralement analysé comme *gouvernementalité algorithmique*, dans leur article éponyme (2013), décrit avec rigueur ce glissement : dans un monde où le pouvoir ne s’exerce plus à travers des volontés mais des corrélations, la norme est découverte à même les régularités comportementales. Elle tend à devenir un savoir sans distanciation et une prescription sans explicitation. +L'anesthésie normative prend alors plusieurs formes : réduction de la +norme à la donnée, effacement du seuil critique dans les processus +décisionnels, incorporation inconsciente des logiques d'optimisation. Ce +que les chercheurs Antoinette Rouvroy et Thomas Berns ont magistralement +analysé comme *gouvernementalité algorithmique*, dans leur article +éponyme (2013), décrit avec rigueur ce glissement : dans un monde où le +pouvoir ne s'exerce plus à travers des volontés mais des corrélations, +la norme est découverte à même les régularités comportementales. Elle +tend à devenir un savoir sans distanciation et une prescription sans +explicitation. -Lorsque cette phase oblitérée se stabilise durablement, la régulation tend vers ce que nous nommerons plus loin autarchicratie : un régime dans lequel les circuits normatifs tendent à s’auto-certifier sans plus affronter de scène d’épreuve effective. +Lorsque cette phase oblitérée se stabilise durablement, la régulation +tend vers ce que nous nommerons plus loin autarchicratie : un régime +dans lequel les circuits normatifs tendent à s'auto-certifier sans plus +affronter de scène d'épreuve effective. -Dans ce contexte, la régulation cesse de faire advenir le sujet comme sujet de droit, de parole ou de récit. Elle ne le reconnaît plus ; elle le décompose, l’anticipe, l’incite, l’oriente — mais ne l’écoute pas. Le silence de l’algorithme n’est pas celui du secret, mais celui de l’indifférence à la souffrance, à l’écart, à la voix discordante. C’est cette indifférence que nous nommons *anesthésie normative*, et elle constitue le noyau pathogène de la phase oblitérée de l’archicration. +Dans ce contexte, la régulation cesse de faire advenir le sujet comme +sujet de droit, de parole ou de récit. Elle ne le reconnaît plus ; elle +le décompose, l'anticipe, l'incite, l'oriente — mais ne l'écoute pas. +Le silence de l'algorithme n'est pas celui du secret, mais celui de +l'indifférence à la souffrance, à l'écart, à la voix discordante. C'est +cette indifférence que nous nommons *anesthésie normative*, et elle +constitue le noyau pathogène de la phase oblitérée de l'archicration. -Là où la normativité moderne — qu’elle fût disciplinaire (Foucault), institutionnelle (Weber), ou contractualisée (Durkheim) — faisait encore du sujet un acteur ou un témoin, fut-ce sous des modalités contraintes, le régime actuel produit un sujet spectral, sans consistance, sans adresse, sans espace d’inscription. Le pouvoir ne s’adresse plus : il configure, il distribue, il prédétermine. +Là où la normativité moderne — qu'elle fût disciplinaire (Foucault), +institutionnelle (Weber), ou contractualisée (Durkheim) — faisait +encore du sujet un acteur ou un témoin, fut-ce sous des modalités +contraintes, le régime actuel produit un sujet spectral, sans +consistance, sans adresse, sans espace d'inscription. Le pouvoir ne +s'adresse plus : il configure, il distribue, il prédétermine. -Et cette mutation n’est pas sans conséquence sur la scène démocratique elle-même : en dissolvant la conflictualité dans l’opacité calculatoire, en absorbant la règle dans la norme auto-adaptative, le système désarme les luttes et dépolitise les affects. Il crée des individus *régulés sans régulation*, *soumis sans pouvoir se dire soumis*, *normalisés sans norme explicite*. Le désaccord devient plus difficilement intelligible, parce que les termes mêmes qui permettraient de le formuler s’effacent. L’archicration cesse alors d’être visible, et avec elle se fragilise la possibilité de résister à ce qui n’apparaît plus clairement comme domination. +Et cette mutation n'est pas sans conséquence sur la scène démocratique +elle-même : en dissolvant la conflictualité dans l'opacité calculatoire, +en absorbant la règle dans la norme auto-adaptative, le système désarme +les luttes et dépolitise les affects. Il crée des individus *régulés +sans régulation*, *soumis sans pouvoir se dire soumis*, *normalisés sans +norme explicite*. Le désaccord devient plus difficilement intelligible, +parce que les termes mêmes qui permettraient de le formuler s'effacent. +L'archicration cesse alors d'être visible, et avec elle se fragilise la +possibilité de résister à ce qui n'apparaît plus clairement comme +domination. -#### **L’impossibilité d’intégrer le dissensus et l’expérience vécue : vers une régulation sans mémoire, sans voix, sans monde** +#### **L'impossibilité d'intégrer le dissensus et l'expérience vécue : vers une régulation sans mémoire, sans voix, sans monde** -Ce troisième point constitue sans doute le nerf vif de notre critique : le régime d’archicration oblitérée ne se contente pas de marginaliser la conflictualité ; il tend à la rendre structurellement difficile à intégrer. Là où toute scène politique, même autoritaire, suppose une reconnaissance minimale du conflit comme modalité constitutive du lien social — fût-ce pour le réprimer, le circonscrire, l’instrumentaliser —, la régulation algorithmique contemporaine neutralise a priori le dissensus comme catégorie opératoire. Elle n’en fait pas un adversaire ; elle l’annule comme *non pertinent*. +Ce troisième point constitue sans doute le nerf vif de notre critique : +le régime d'archicration oblitérée ne se contente pas de marginaliser la +conflictualité ; il tend à la rendre structurellement difficile à +intégrer. Là où toute scène politique, même autoritaire, suppose une +reconnaissance minimale du conflit comme modalité constitutive du lien +social — fût-ce pour le réprimer, le circonscrire, l'instrumentaliser +—, la régulation algorithmique contemporaine neutralise a priori le +dissensus comme catégorie opératoire. Elle n'en fait pas un adversaire ; +elle l'annule comme *non pertinent*. -Ce mouvement est d’une violence d’autant plus radicale qu’il ne se dit jamais comme tel : il ne s’agit pas de censurer une voix, de réfuter une expérience, mais de les rendre illisibles dans les protocoles mêmes de la décision. Le dissensus n’est pas interdit ; il est rendu non pertinent par le système. Cela constitue une rupture anthropologique majeure, car les régimes antérieurs de normativité — qu’ils fussent juridiques, bureaucratiques ou même disciplinaires — intégraient la voix, la plainte, le témoignage, fût-ce sous forme de doléance ou de rituel d’exclusion. Le régime algorithmique, lui, se fonde sur une positivité sans mémoire, où seuls comptent les signaux disponibles, les patterns corrélés, les profils anticipables. +Ce mouvement est d'une violence d'autant plus radicale qu'il ne se dit +jamais comme tel : il ne s'agit pas de censurer une voix, de réfuter une +expérience, mais de les rendre illisibles dans les protocoles mêmes de +la décision. Le dissensus n'est pas interdit ; il est rendu non +pertinent par le système. Cela constitue une rupture anthropologique +majeure, car les régimes antérieurs de normativité — qu'ils fussent +juridiques, bureaucratiques ou même disciplinaires — intégraient la +voix, la plainte, le témoignage, fût-ce sous forme de doléance ou de +rituel d'exclusion. Le régime algorithmique, lui, se fonde sur une +positivité sans mémoire, où seuls comptent les signaux disponibles, les +patterns corrélés, les profils anticipables. -L’expérience vécue — celle du précaire, du minoré, du marginal, du souffrant — tend alors à devenir un bruit dans le système, un résidu difficilement traitable. La dimension incarnée, narrative et située de l’existence humaine est de moins en moins reconnue comme variable pertinente. Ainsi, les vécus collectifs qui nourrissaient les mouvements sociaux se trouvent progressivement déconnectés de la scène régulatoire. +L'expérience vécue — celle du précaire, du minoré, du marginal, du +souffrant — tend alors à devenir un bruit dans le système, un résidu +difficilement traitable. La dimension incarnée, narrative et située de +l'existence humaine est de moins en moins reconnue comme variable +pertinente. Ainsi, les vécus collectifs qui nourrissaient les mouvements +sociaux se trouvent progressivement déconnectés de la scène régulatoire. -Cette invisibilisation structurelle a été magistralement analysée par Virginia Eubanks dans *Automating Inequality* (2018), où elle démontre comment les systèmes d’aide sociale automatisés excluent systématiquement les plus vulnérables en s’appuyant sur des métriques biaisées, des données partielles, et des algorithmes opaques. Ce n’est pas l’arbitraire d’un juge ou d’un agent humain qui opère l’exclusion, mais l’indifférence intrinsèque du système à tout ce qui ne rentre pas dans ses cases pré-formatées. L’algorithme ne hait pas ; il ne voit pas. C’est là l’un des ressorts de cette violence sans sujet : une régulation sans regard véritable, incapable d’accueillir l’expérience. +Cette invisibilisation structurelle a été magistralement analysée par +Virginia Eubanks dans *Automating Inequality* (2018), où elle démontre +comment les systèmes d'aide sociale automatisés excluent +systématiquement les plus vulnérables en s'appuyant sur des métriques +biaisées, des données partielles, et des algorithmes opaques. Ce n'est +pas l'arbitraire d'un juge ou d'un agent humain qui opère l'exclusion, +mais l'indifférence intrinsèque du système à tout ce qui ne rentre pas +dans ses cases pré-formatées. L'algorithme ne hait pas ; il ne voit pas. +C'est là l'un des ressorts de cette violence sans sujet : une régulation +sans regard véritable, incapable d'accueillir l'expérience. -Dans ce contexte, les formes classiques de la protestation politique se heurtent à un mur de verre. Les manifestations, les cris, les appels ne rencontrent plus d’interlocuteur : le pouvoir n’a plus d’oreilles. C’est ce que Thomas Berns nomme une *gouvernementalité sans garant* : un pouvoir qui opère sans sujet de l’action, sans engagement, sans responsabilité. La structure s’impose comme nature. Et la plainte devient alors pathologisée, disqualifiée, délégitimée : si le système ne voit pas un sujet, c’est qu’il le tient pour non pertinent. Ainsi s’installe une forme perverse de légitimation inversée : n’est légitime que ce qui est déjà intégrable, ce qui a déjà été *capté* et *calculé*. +Dans ce contexte, les formes classiques de la protestation politique se +heurtent à un mur de verre. Les manifestations, les cris, les appels ne +rencontrent plus d'interlocuteur : le pouvoir n'a plus d'oreilles. C'est +ce que Thomas Berns nomme une *gouvernementalité sans garant* : un +pouvoir qui opère sans sujet de l'action, sans engagement, sans +responsabilité. La structure s'impose comme nature. Et la plainte +devient alors pathologisée, disqualifiée, délégitimée : si le système ne +voit pas un sujet, c'est qu'il le tient pour non pertinent. Ainsi +s'installe une forme perverse de légitimation inversée : n'est légitime +que ce qui est déjà intégrable, ce qui a déjà été *capté* et *calculé*. -Cette logique atteint son paroxysme dans le cas du *crédit social chinois*, ou dans les logiques de *scoring comportemental* développées par les géants du numérique : il ne s’agit pas de gouverner des citoyens dotés de droits, mais de calibrer des comportements sur la base de leur compatibilité systémique. L’expérience vécue, le récit subjectif, la mémoire collective deviennent des artefacts obsolètes dans un monde où seul compte l’alignement avec les paramètres du système. +Cette logique atteint son paroxysme dans le cas du *crédit social +chinois*, ou dans les logiques de *scoring comportemental* développées +par les géants du numérique : il ne s'agit pas de gouverner des citoyens +dotés de droits, mais de calibrer des comportements sur la base de leur +compatibilité systémique. L'expérience vécue, le récit subjectif, la +mémoire collective deviennent des artefacts obsolètes dans un monde où +seul compte l'alignement avec les paramètres du système. -À cette lumière, certaines formes contemporaines de dissidence — féministes, antiracistes, écologistes ou décoloniales — apparaissent moins comme de simples revendications de droits que comme des tentatives pour rouvrir une scène où des expériences situées puissent parler, être entendues et contester l’ordre existant. +À cette lumière, certaines formes contemporaines de dissidence — féministes, antiracistes, écologistes ou décoloniales — apparaissent +moins comme de simples revendications de droits que comme des tentatives +pour rouvrir une scène où des expériences situées puissent parler, être +entendues et contester l'ordre existant. -Ce que le régime actuel rend impossible, c’est l’expérience de la *parole comme acte régulateur*. En cela, il produit une déréliction politique profonde, une forme de désolation démocratique où plus personne n’est responsable, où plus rien ne peut être adressé, où nul ne peut être convoqué. Une régulation qui efface durablement le sujet tend à devenir une régulation sans monde partageable. Et c’est cette ruine de l’espace commun que nous devons refuser, en redonnant forme, épaisseur, conflictualité et chair à la scène régulatrice elle-même. +Ce que le régime actuel rend impossible, c'est l'expérience de la +*parole comme acte régulateur*. En cela, il produit une déréliction +politique profonde, une forme de désolation démocratique où plus +personne n'est responsable, où plus rien ne peut être adressé, où nul ne +peut être convoqué. Une régulation qui efface durablement le sujet tend +à devenir une régulation sans monde partageable. Et c'est cette ruine de +l'espace commun que nous devons refuser, en redonnant forme, épaisseur, +conflictualité et chair à la scène régulatrice elle-même. -Ce que révèle en profondeur notre examen de la régulation automatisée, c’est l’illusion d’un monde qui pourrait se gouverner sans être véritablement habité, éprouvé et raconté. Ce fantasme d’auto-pilotage algorithmique, s’il a pu naître de l’horizon cybernétique des années 1950 et se consolider sous les auspices néolibéraux des années 1980, atteint au XXIe siècle un degré d’accomplissement tel qu’il menace jusqu’à la possibilité même d’un monde commun. Ce que produit ce régime, en réalité, ce n’est pas une stabilité augmentée, ni une neutralité gouvernante, mais une régulation désertée, désincarnée, appauvrie dans son rapport au monde sensible, où l’exclusion ne procède plus d’un choix idéologique ou d’un arbitrage éthique, mais d’un simple silence du système. +Ce que révèle en profondeur notre examen de la régulation automatisée, +c'est l'illusion d'un monde qui pourrait se gouverner sans être +véritablement habité, éprouvé et raconté. Ce fantasme d'auto-pilotage +algorithmique, s'il a pu naître de l'horizon cybernétique des années +1950 et se consolider sous les auspices néolibéraux des années 1980, +atteint au XXIe siècle un degré d'accomplissement tel qu'il menace +jusqu'à la possibilité même d'un monde commun. Ce que produit ce régime, +en réalité, ce n'est pas une stabilité augmentée, ni une neutralité +gouvernante, mais une régulation désertée, désincarnée, appauvrie dans +son rapport au monde sensible, où l'exclusion ne procède plus d'un choix +idéologique ou d'un arbitrage éthique, mais d'un simple silence du +système. -Dans ce silence, ce n’est pas seulement l’autre qui s’efface, mais le « nous » lui-même, c’est-à-dire la possibilité d’un partage du pouvoir, du savoir et de la norme. L’archicration automatisée ne remplace pas le politique : elle tend à le dissoudre dans un calcul qui peine à accueillir la dissension, le jugement et la prudence. Une régulation qui ne se conçoit plus que sous cette forme s’engage déjà sur une pente autarchicratique : tout y fonctionne, mais de moins en moins de choses s’y laissent éprouver. +Dans ce silence, ce n'est pas seulement l'autre qui s'efface, mais le +« nous » lui-même, c'est-à-dire la possibilité d'un partage du pouvoir, +du savoir et de la norme. L'archicration automatisée ne remplace pas le +politique : elle tend à le dissoudre dans un calcul qui peine à +accueillir la dissension, le jugement et la prudence. Une régulation qui +ne se conçoit plus que sous cette forme s'engage déjà sur une pente +autarchicratique : tout y fonctionne, mais de moins en moins de choses +s'y laissent éprouver. -Mais une telle régulation ne tient qu’au prix d’un oubli de ses propres conditions : la parole, l’épreuve, la mémoire, la scène. Or l’humain n’est pas réductible à un agrégat de données, à un profil ou à un flux comportemental. Il engage du corps, de la voix, de la mémoire, du jugement et du conflit de valeurs. La régulation algorithmique tend précisément à négliger cette épaisseur ; c’est là l’une de ses limites structurales les plus profondes. +Mais une telle régulation ne tient qu'au prix d'un oubli de ses propres +conditions : la parole, l'épreuve, la mémoire, la scène. Or l'humain +n'est pas réductible à un agrégat de données, à un profil ou à un flux +comportemental. Il engage du corps, de la voix, de la mémoire, du +jugement et du conflit de valeurs. La régulation algorithmique tend +précisément à négliger cette épaisseur ; c'est là l'une de ses limites +structurales les plus profondes. -Ce que nous avons nommé archicration — cette scène de régulation où se jouent ensemble règle, puissance et épreuve — ne se trouve donc pas dépassé, mais oblitéré. C’est ce qui rend la critique de ce régime décisive : sans scène, la régulation perd son sens fort ; sans incarnation du dissensus, l’institution s’évide ; sans voix, le commun se décompose. +Ce que nous avons nommé archicration — cette scène de régulation où se +jouent ensemble règle, puissance et épreuve — ne se trouve donc pas +dépassé, mais oblitéré. C'est ce qui rend la critique de ce régime +décisive : sans scène, la régulation perd son sens fort ; sans +incarnation du dissensus, l'institution s'évide ; sans voix, le commun +se décompose. -Dès lors s’impose la nécessité d’une réinstauration archicratique consciente : non pour revenir à une forme ancienne du pouvoir, mais pour rouvrir un lieu où le pouvoir puisse être contesté, où la régulation puisse être exposée, et où le sens puisse de nouveau être disputé. Si l’archicration oblitérée atteint ici son point critique, alors deux voies seulement se dessinent : la perpétuation d’un monde tendanciellement autarchicratique, ou la réinstauration de scènes habitées capables de rendre la régulation à nouveau visible, discutable et partageable. +Dès lors s'impose la nécessité d'une réinstauration archicratique +consciente : non pour revenir à une forme ancienne du pouvoir, mais pour +rouvrir un lieu où le pouvoir puisse être contesté, où la régulation +puisse être exposée, et où le sens puisse de nouveau être disputé. Si +l'archicration oblitérée atteint ici son point critique, alors deux +voies seulement se dessinent : la perpétuation d'un monde +tendanciellement autarchicratique, ou la réinstauration de scènes +habitées capables de rendre la régulation à nouveau visible, discutable +et partageable. -## Conclusion du chapitre 4 — La cinquième révolution régulatoire serait-elle celle de l’instauration consciente de la scène archicratique ? +## Conclusion du chapitre 4 — La cinquième révolution régulatoire serait-elle celle de l'instauration consciente de la scène archicratique ? -L’histoire des méta-régimes régulateurs analysés dans ce chapitre — depuis l’encastrement industriel du pouvoir jusqu’à son oblitération algorithmique — fait apparaître un phénomène décisif : à chaque phase, ce n’est pas seulement le mode de régulation qui change, mais la possibilité même d’en débattre, d’en voir la scène et d’en interroger les fondements. Plus les dispositifs se raffinent, plus la capacité collective à en éprouver la légitimité tend à se rétracter. Le problème ne tient ni à une malveillance originelle ni à une intention conspirationniste ; il procède d’une logique interne : chaque méta-régime, en poussant ses instruments d’efficience, tend aussi à rétrécir l’espace dans lequel ses normes peuvent encore être exposées, discutées et contestées. +L'histoire des méta-régimes régulateurs analysés dans ce chapitre — depuis l'encastrement industriel du pouvoir jusqu'à son oblitération +algorithmique — fait apparaître un phénomène décisif : à chaque phase, +ce n'est pas seulement le mode de régulation qui change, mais la +possibilité même d'en débattre, d'en voir la scène et d'en interroger +les fondements. Plus les dispositifs se raffinent, plus la capacité +collective à en éprouver la légitimité tend à se rétracter. Le problème +ne tient ni à une malveillance originelle ni à une intention +conspirationniste ; il procède d'une logique interne : chaque +méta-régime, en poussant ses instruments d'efficience, tend aussi à +rétrécir l'espace dans lequel ses normes peuvent encore être exposées, +discutées et contestées. -Le régime disciplinaire du XIXe siècle, bien qu’empreint de coercition, laissait encore place à une scène politique identifiable : luttes ouvrières, conflits sociaux, médiations étatiques en attestaient l’existence. Le régime fordiste, en contractualisant partiellement la régulation, avait instauré des formes de compromis certes asymétriques, mais visibles, représentables et opposables. Avec la révolution cybernétique et la gouvernementalité néolibérale, cette scène s’est d’abord complexifiée, puis progressivement effacée : le pouvoir régulateur s’est réfugié dans les interfaces, les métriques, les algorithmes et les abstractions gestionnaires, au point de faire croire que la régulation pourrait se passer d’institution, d’arène, de confrontation et de voix. +Le régime disciplinaire du XIXe siècle, bien qu'empreint de coercition, +laissait encore place à une scène politique identifiable : luttes +ouvrières, conflits sociaux, médiations étatiques en attestaient +l'existence. Le régime fordiste, en contractualisant partiellement la +régulation, avait instauré des formes de compromis certes asymétriques, +mais visibles, représentables et opposables. Avec la révolution +cybernétique et la gouvernementalité néolibérale, cette scène s'est +d'abord complexifiée, puis progressivement effacée : le pouvoir +régulateur s'est réfugié dans les interfaces, les métriques, les +algorithmes et les abstractions gestionnaires, au point de faire croire +que la régulation pourrait se passer d'institution, d'arène, de +confrontation et de voix. -Or ce processus d’oblitération n’a pas été sans coût. Il a creusé les conditions de ce que nous avons désigné comme une *normativité sans sujet* : production de normes sans scène clairement praticable, sans normalisateurs identifiables, sans critères explicites de légitimation ni de contestation. L’archicration dispersée, puis oblitérée, en prétendant s’affranchir du politique, a fini par rendre plus difficilement lisible la question même de savoir où, quand, comment et par qui une société est régulée. C’est là que se situe le point de bascule : dans l’effacement de la scène régulatrice, non seulement l’autorité devient moins saisissable, mais la régulation elle-même devient plus difficilement soutenable. +Or ce processus d'oblitération n'a pas été sans coût. Il a creusé les +conditions de ce que nous avons désigné comme une *normativité sans +sujet* : production de normes sans scène clairement praticable, sans +normalisateurs identifiables, sans critères explicites de légitimation +ni de contestation. L'archicration dispersée, puis oblitérée, en +prétendant s'affranchir du politique, a fini par rendre plus +difficilement lisible la question même de savoir où, quand, comment et +par qui une société est régulée. C'est là que se situe le point de +bascule : dans l'effacement de la scène régulatrice, non seulement +l'autorité devient moins saisissable, mais la régulation elle-même +devient plus difficilement soutenable. -C’est à ce point précis que s’ouvre l’hypothèse d’une cinquième révolution régulatoire : non comme prolongement linéaire des innovations précédentes, ni comme simple réponse adaptative aux crises en cours, mais comme rupture réflexive. Il ne s’agirait plus de réguler davantage, ni même seulement plus efficacement, mais de réinstituer la scène de la régulation comme lieu de légitimation, de dissensus et de décision assumée. Une telle inflexion ne désigne pas un nouveau paradigme technoscientifique miraculeux. Elle désigne la nécessité de rendre à nouveau visible ce qui, dans les régimes récents, s’est produit sans visage, sans parole et sans responsabilité clairement assignable. +C'est à ce point précis que s'ouvre l'hypothèse d'une cinquième +révolution régulatoire : non comme prolongement linéaire des innovations +précédentes, ni comme simple réponse adaptative aux crises en cours, +mais comme rupture réflexive. Il ne s'agirait plus de réguler davantage, +ni même seulement plus efficacement, mais de réinstituer la scène de la +régulation comme lieu de légitimation, de dissensus et de décision +assumée. Une telle inflexion ne désigne pas un nouveau paradigme +technoscientifique miraculeux. Elle désigne la nécessité de rendre à +nouveau visible ce qui, dans les régimes récents, s'est produit sans +visage, sans parole et sans responsabilité clairement assignable. -Une telle réinstauration ne prendra sens qu’à la condition que la régulation cesse d’opérer dans l’opacité de ses propres procédures. Elle devra redevenir visible dans ses formes, discutable dans ses critères, révisable dans ses effets, capable d’accueillir la pluralité des mondes vécus, et rapportable à des instances effectivement identifiables. Car une norme n’est légitime ni parce qu’elle fonctionne, ni parce qu’elle optimise : elle ne le devient qu’à partir du moment où elle peut apparaître, être interrogée, contestée, corrigée et assumée. +Une telle réinstauration ne prendra sens qu'à la condition que la +régulation cesse d'opérer dans l'opacité de ses propres procédures. Elle +devra redevenir visible dans ses formes, discutable dans ses critères, +révisable dans ses effets, capable d'accueillir la pluralité des mondes +vécus, et rapportable à des instances effectivement identifiables. Car +une norme n'est légitime ni parce qu'elle fonctionne, ni parce qu'elle +optimise : elle ne le devient qu'à partir du moment où elle peut +apparaître, être interrogée, contestée, corrigée et assumée. -C’est à ce prix seulement que la régulation pourra sortir de l’automatisme silencieux où les régimes contemporains tendent à l’enfermer. Faute de quoi, elle continuera de se déployer comme pouvoir sans scène, sans répondant et sans épreuve ; autrement dit, comme une normativité techniquement efficace mais politiquement appauvrie. Réinstituer l’archicration, ce ne sera donc pas ajouter un supplément de participation à des dispositifs inchangés, mais rouvrir le lieu même où les normes se forment, se confrontent et se rendent partageables. +C'est à ce prix seulement que la régulation pourra sortir de +l'automatisme silencieux où les régimes contemporains tendent à +l'enfermer. Faute de quoi, elle continuera de se déployer comme pouvoir +sans scène, sans répondant et sans épreuve ; autrement dit, comme une +normativité techniquement efficace mais politiquement appauvrie. +Réinstituer l'archicration, ce ne sera donc pas ajouter un supplément de +participation à des dispositifs inchangés, mais rouvrir le lieu même où +les normes se forment, se confrontent et se rendent partageables. -Ces exigences ne constituent pas une utopie désincarnée. Elles dessinent le socle minimal d’une régulation habitable : une régulation capable de demeurer à la fois visible dans ses formes, discutable dans ses critères, révisable dans ses effets, attentive à la pluralité des mondes vécus et rapportable à des instances identifiables. L’archicratie, dans cette perspective, ne désigne plus seulement une logique diffuse du pouvoir ; elle devient l’exigence d’une scène régulatrice explicitement instituée, où les normes sont exposées à l’épreuve du commun. +Ces exigences ne constituent pas une utopie désincarnée. Elles dessinent +le socle minimal d'une régulation habitable : une régulation capable de +demeurer à la fois visible dans ses formes, discutable dans ses +critères, révisable dans ses effets, attentive à la pluralité des mondes +vécus et rapportable à des instances identifiables. L'archicratie, dans +cette perspective, ne désigne plus seulement une logique diffuse du +pouvoir ; elle devient l'exigence d'une scène régulatrice explicitement +instituée, où les normes sont exposées à l'épreuve du commun. -C’est pourquoi la cinquième révolution régulatoire, si elle doit advenir, ne pourra être ni simplement technique ni simplement institutionnelle. Elle sera d’abord archiscénique : elle portera sur la possibilité même de rendre la régulation visible, discutable et partageable. Car la régulation n’est jamais neutre. Elle engage toujours une certaine manière de répondre à la question de ce qui compte, de ce qui mérite d’être soutenu, interdit, permis, anticipé ou corrigé. Toute régulation implique donc un rapport au vivant, au commun, au conflit et à la pluralité irréductible des existences humaines. +C'est pourquoi la cinquième révolution régulatoire, si elle doit +advenir, ne pourra être ni simplement technique ni simplement +institutionnelle. Elle sera d'abord archiscénique : elle portera sur la +possibilité même de rendre la régulation visible, discutable et +partageable. Car la régulation n'est jamais neutre. Elle engage toujours +une certaine manière de répondre à la question de ce qui compte, de ce +qui mérite d'être soutenu, interdit, permis, anticipé ou corrigé. Toute +régulation implique donc un rapport au vivant, au commun, au conflit et +à la pluralité irréductible des existences humaines. -Ce que les régimes précédents ont successivement recouvert — par mécanisation, bureaucratisation, automatisation puis oblitération algorithmique —, c’est que la régulation n’est jamais un pur appareillage technique : elle engage toujours une prise sur le vivant. Elle peut mutiler, discipliner, exclure ; elle peut aussi instituer, composer, rendre un monde habitable. Toute la question devient alors de savoir si une société accepte encore d’exposer cette prise, d’en répondre, d’en faire une scène plutôt qu’un automatisme. +Ce que les régimes précédents ont successivement recouvert — par +mécanisation, bureaucratisation, automatisation puis oblitération +algorithmique —, c'est que la régulation n'est jamais un pur +appareillage technique : elle engage toujours une prise sur le vivant. +Elle peut mutiler, discipliner, exclure ; elle peut aussi instituer, +composer, rendre un monde habitable. Toute la question devient alors de +savoir si une société accepte encore d'exposer cette prise, d'en +répondre, d'en faire une scène plutôt qu'un automatisme. -Il ne s’agit donc ni de restaurer une souveraineté perdue, ni de se livrer à la technocratie, ni de rêver abstraitement une transparence parfaite. Il s’agit de rouvrir, dans les institutions, les infrastructures et les milieux de vie, l’espace où la régulation redevient visible, contestable et partageable. Car une norme n’est jamais légitime du seul fait qu’elle fonctionne ; elle ne le devient qu’à partir du moment où elle peut être rapportée à une épreuve, à une conflictualité, à une responsabilité. +Il ne s'agit donc ni de restaurer une souveraineté perdue, ni de se +livrer à la technocratie, ni de rêver abstraitement une transparence +parfaite. Il s'agit de rouvrir, dans les institutions, les +infrastructures et les milieux de vie, l'espace où la régulation +redevient visible, contestable et partageable. Car une norme n'est +jamais légitime du seul fait qu'elle fonctionne ; elle ne le devient +qu'à partir du moment où elle peut être rapportée à une épreuve, à une +conflictualité, à une responsabilité. -C’est pourquoi ce chapitre ne pouvait se clore sur lui-même. La traversée généalogique qu’il propose n’avait pas pour fin de raconter une succession de révolutions industrielles, mais de montrer comment chacune d’elles a reconfiguré la possibilité même d’une scène régulatrice. À mesure que l’infrastructure s’épaissit, ouvrir une telle scène devient plus coûteux ; et sa fermeture, plus aisément présentable comme efficacité. Rien pourtant n’y fait destin : seule l’épreuve permet de dire si une scène fut véritablement instituée, ou seulement simulée. +C'est pourquoi ce chapitre ne pouvait se clore sur lui-même. La +traversée généalogique qu'il propose n'avait pas pour fin de raconter +une succession de révolutions industrielles, mais de montrer comment +chacune d'elles a reconfiguré la possibilité même d'une scène +régulatrice. À mesure que l'infrastructure s'épaissit, ouvrir une telle +scène devient plus coûteux ; et sa fermeture, plus aisément présentable +comme efficacité. Rien pourtant n'y fait destin : seule l'épreuve permet +de dire si une scène fut véritablement instituée, ou seulement simulée. -La suite devra donc quitter le plan généalogique pour entrer dans celui des tensions vives. Car la cinquième révolution régulatoire, si elle a un sens, ne pourra advenir qu’en affrontant les lignes de fracture concrètes où se joue aujourd’hui la co-viabilité du monde commun. C’est là que s’ouvre le chapitre 5 : non plus sur l’histoire d’un pouvoir qui se dérobe, mais sur les lieux où la régulation devra de nouveau comparaître, répondre, et s’exposer à l’épreuve. +La suite devra donc quitter le plan généalogique pour entrer dans celui +des tensions vives. Car la cinquième révolution régulatoire, si elle a +un sens, ne pourra advenir qu'en affrontant les lignes de fracture +concrètes où se joue aujourd'hui la co-viabilité du monde commun. C'est +là que s'ouvre le chapitre 5 : non plus sur l'histoire d'un pouvoir qui +se dérobe, mais sur les lieux où la régulation devra de nouveau +comparaître, répondre, et s'exposer à l'épreuve. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-5.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-5.mdx index c727ee6..fb7b84a 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-5.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/chapitre-5.mdx @@ -1,1210 +1,5720 @@ --- -title: "Chapitre 5 — Tensions, co-viabilités et régulations" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Chapitre 5 — Tensions, co-viabilités et régulations +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 60 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_5—Problematiques_des_tensions_des_co-viabilites_et_des_regulations_archicratiques-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_5—Problematiques_des_tensions_des_co-viabilites_et_des_regulations_archicratiques-version_officielle.docx --- -L’époque contemporaine s’est emparée du terme soutenabilité avec une insistance telle qu’elle pourrait laisser croire à l’émergence d’une conscience enfin lucide de l’interdépendance entre systèmes naturels, économies, institutions, subjectivités, techniques et formes de vie. À première vue, le mot paraît répondre à une nécessité historique. Il semble désigner la prise en compte des limites, des vulnérabilités, des interdépendances et des irréversibilités qui traversent le monde contemporain. Pourtant, cette évidence apparente exige d’être immédiatement troublée. Car la soutenabilité ne se borne pas à nommer une alerte ; elle en organise aussi le cadrage, en reformulant les contradictions du monde dans les termes d’une mise en compatibilité administrable. -Sous son apparente neutralité, le lexique de la soutenabilité reconduit ainsi une opération plus profonde : il naturalise des conflits qui devraient être rendus politiquement disputables. Il transforme des antagonismes structurels en variables de régulation. Il traduit des incompatibilités de co-viabilité en déséquilibres paramétrables. Sous le langage de la préservation, il reconduit une entreprise de neutralisation. Ce qui, dans un autre vocabulaire, apparaîtrait comme extraction, dépossession, sacrifice différentiel, hiérarchisation des vies ou capture des capacités d’agir, se trouve requalifié sous des catégories plus lisses : résilience, adaptation, transition, compensation, gouvernance, développement soutenable. Le vocabulaire change ; la conflictualité se dérobe. +L'époque contemporaine s'est emparée du terme soutenabilité avec une +insistance telle qu'elle pourrait laisser croire à l'émergence d'une +conscience enfin lucide de l'interdépendance entre systèmes naturels, +économies, institutions, subjectivités, techniques et formes de vie. À +première vue, le mot paraît répondre à une nécessité historique. Il +semble désigner la prise en compte des limites, des vulnérabilités, des +interdépendances et des irréversibilités qui traversent le monde +contemporain. Pourtant, cette évidence apparente exige d'être +immédiatement troublée. Car la soutenabilité ne se borne pas à nommer +une alerte ; elle en organise aussi le cadrage, en reformulant les +contradictions du monde dans les termes d'une mise en compatibilité +administrable. -C’est en ce sens qu’il faut comprendre le destin historique de la soutenabilité telle qu’elle s’est imposée depuis le rapport Brundtland : non comme simple progrès réflexif, mais comme régime discursif ambivalent, capable à la fois de signaler des menaces réelles et d’en amortir la portée politique. L’exploitation coloniale devient retard de développement. L’extractivisme se recompose en partenariat. La destruction des milieux se convertit en coût compensable. Les subjectivités lésées deviennent données d’impact. Les souffrances, les pertes, les dépossessions et les asymétries, au lieu d’être instituées comme matière de litige, se trouvent absorbées dans des protocoles d’évaluation. Le conflit n’est pas affronté : il est converti. Il n’est pas rendu disputable : il est administré. +Sous son apparente neutralité, le lexique de la soutenabilité reconduit +ainsi une opération plus profonde : il naturalise des conflits qui +devraient être rendus politiquement disputables. Il transforme des +antagonismes structurels en variables de régulation. Il traduit des +incompatibilités de co-viabilité en déséquilibres paramétrables. Sous le +langage de la préservation, il reconduit une entreprise de +neutralisation. Ce qui, dans un autre vocabulaire, apparaîtrait comme +extraction, dépossession, sacrifice différentiel, hiérarchisation des +vies ou capture des capacités d'agir, se trouve requalifié sous des +catégories plus lisses : résilience, adaptation, transition, +compensation, gouvernance, développement soutenable. Le vocabulaire +change ; la conflictualité se dérobe. -Une telle critique, toutefois, ne constitue ici qu’un seuil. L’enjeu de ce chapitre n’est pas seulement de dénoncer les insuffisances du lexique de la durabilité, mais de mettre au jour ce qu’il tend précisément à neutraliser : les tensions sans lesquelles aucune scène de co-viabilité réelle ne peut être pensée. C’est là que s’opère le déplacement décisif. Il ne s’agit plus de demander comment rendre durable un ordre donné, mais de comprendre à partir de quelles tensions irréductibles un monde peut encore être rendu habitable sans reconduire la violence sous les habits de l’équilibre. La question n’est plus : comment préserver le système ? Elle devient : qu’instituer pour que la viabilité ne soit pas le nom euphémisé d’une répartition inégale des charges, des pertes et des possibilités d’existence ? +C'est en ce sens qu'il faut comprendre le destin historique de la +soutenabilité telle qu'elle s'est imposée depuis le rapport Brundtland : +non comme simple progrès réflexif, mais comme régime discursif +ambivalent, capable à la fois de signaler des menaces réelles et d'en +amortir la portée politique. L'exploitation coloniale devient retard de +développement. L'extractivisme se recompose en partenariat. La +destruction des milieux se convertit en coût compensable. Les +subjectivités lésées deviennent données d'impact. Les souffrances, les +pertes, les dépossessions et les asymétries, au lieu d'être instituées +comme matière de litige, se trouvent absorbées dans des protocoles +d'évaluation. Le conflit n'est pas affronté : il est converti. Il n'est +pas rendu disputable : il est administré. -La thèse archicratique soutenue dans cet essai procède précisément de ce renversement. Elle substitue à la fiction consensuelle de la durabilité l’exigence conflictuelle de la co-viabilité. La viabilité n’y apparaît plus comme propriété fonctionnelle d’un système, ni comme résultat spontané d’un bon ajustement, ni comme horizon harmonisateur qu’il suffirait d’approcher progressivement. Elle désigne au contraire le résultat toujours provisoire, toujours disputable, toujours différencié, d’une régulation explicite de tensions constitutives. Il n’y a de monde habitable qu’à travers des scènes où les incompatibilités qui le traversent peuvent être nommées, symbolisées, exposées, mises en tension, reprises et transformées sans être niées ni livrées à la pure destruction. Les conflits ne sont donc ni des accidents, ni des anomalies, ni des résidus. Ils sont la matière même à partir de laquelle le politique, au sens archicratique du terme, devient possible. +Une telle critique, toutefois, ne constitue ici qu'un seuil. L'enjeu de +ce chapitre n'est pas seulement de dénoncer les insuffisances du lexique +de la durabilité, mais de mettre au jour ce qu'il tend précisément à +neutraliser : les tensions sans lesquelles aucune scène de co-viabilité +réelle ne peut être pensée. C'est là que s'opère le déplacement décisif. +Il ne s'agit plus de demander comment rendre durable un ordre donné, +mais de comprendre à partir de quelles tensions irréductibles un monde +peut encore être rendu habitable sans reconduire la violence sous les +habits de l'équilibre. La question n'est plus : comment préserver le +système ? Elle devient : qu'instituer pour que la viabilité ne soit pas +le nom euphémisé d'une répartition inégale des charges, des pertes et +des possibilités d'existence ? -Encore faut-il préciser ce que l’on entend ici par tension. Le mot serait trompeur s’il désignait un simple désaccord empirique, un conflit localisé ou une opposition contingente entre intérêts. Les tensions dont il sera question dans ce chapitre doivent être comprises comme des tensions irréductibles transversales : irréductibles, parce qu’elles ne peuvent être supprimées sans mutiler l’un des termes qu’elles articulent ou sans reconduire la domination sous une pacification apparente ; transversales, parce qu’elles traversent une pluralité de scènes, d’institutions, de dispositifs et de domaines, sans appartenir en propre à l’un d’entre eux. Elles ne sont ni des thèmes ni de simples catégories descriptives. Elles désignent des incompatibilités structurelles de co-viabilité, c’est-à-dire des lignes de fracture à partir desquelles un monde se révèle habitable pour certains au prix de l’inhabitabilité infligée à d’autres. +La thèse archicratique soutenue dans cet essai procède précisément de ce +renversement. Elle substitue à la fiction consensuelle de la durabilité +l'exigence conflictuelle de la co-viabilité. La viabilité n'y apparaît +plus comme propriété fonctionnelle d'un système, ni comme résultat +spontané d'un bon ajustement, ni comme horizon harmonisateur qu'il +suffirait d'approcher progressivement. Elle désigne au contraire le +résultat toujours provisoire, toujours disputable, toujours différencié, +d'une régulation explicite de tensions constitutives. Il n'y a de monde +habitable qu'à travers des scènes où les incompatibilités qui le +traversent peuvent être nommées, symbolisées, exposées, mises en +tension, reprises et transformées sans être niées ni livrées à la pure +destruction. Les conflits ne sont donc ni des accidents, ni des +anomalies, ni des résidus. Ils sont la matière même à partir de laquelle +le politique, au sens archicratique du terme, devient possible. -Le statut de ces tensions doit néanmoins être précisé avec rigueur. Elles ne désignent ni des essences métaphysiques du monde social, ni de simples constructions arbitraires de l’analyse. Elles correspondent à des incompatibilités effectives de co-viabilité telles qu’elles se manifestent dans les configurations contemporaines, mais elles sont sélectionnées, ordonnées et formulées à l’intérieur d’une coupe analytique visant une suffisance opératoire. +Encore faut-il préciser ce que l'on entend ici par tension. Le mot +serait trompeur s'il désignait un simple désaccord empirique, un conflit +localisé ou une opposition contingente entre intérêts. Les tensions dont +il sera question dans ce chapitre doivent être comprises comme des +tensions irréductibles transversales : irréductibles, parce qu'elles ne +peuvent être supprimées sans mutiler l'un des termes qu'elles articulent +ou sans reconduire la domination sous une pacification apparente ; +transversales, parce qu'elles traversent une pluralité de scènes, +d'institutions, de dispositifs et de domaines, sans appartenir en propre +à l'un d'entre eux. Elles ne sont ni des thèmes ni de simples catégories +descriptives. Elles désignent des incompatibilités structurelles de +co-viabilité, c'est-à-dire des lignes de fracture à partir desquelles un +monde se révèle habitable pour certains au prix de l'inhabitabilité +infligée à d'autres. -Leur validité n’est donc ni celle d’une ontologie exhaustive, ni celle d’une simple commodité de classement. Elle doit être mesurée à leur pouvoir de discernement : là où elles rendent effectivement intelligibles les scènes étudiées, elles valent comme instruments critiques ; là où elles n’ajoutent aucun différentiel de lisibilité, elles doivent être reprises, déplacées ou abandonnées. +Le statut de ces tensions doit néanmoins être précisé avec rigueur. +Elles ne désignent ni des essences métaphysiques du monde social, ni de +simples constructions arbitraires de l'analyse. Elles correspondent à +des incompatibilités effectives de co-viabilité telles qu'elles se +manifestent dans les configurations contemporaines, mais elles sont +sélectionnées, ordonnées et formulées à l'intérieur d'une coupe +analytique visant une suffisance opératoire. -Cette distinction est décisive pour comprendre l’architecture du chapitre. Les analyses qui suivent n’examineront pas des secteurs autonomes de la vie contemporaine. Elles prendront pour objet des cristallisations sectorielles : des scènes historiquement situées dans lesquelles des tensions transversales prennent corps, deviennent lisibles, se stabilisent partiellement, se déplacent, se recomposent et produisent des effets différenciés. L’économie, l’écologie, le social, le politique, le psychique, le médiatique, le technique, le géopolitique, le cosmopolitique et le culturel ne seront donc pas abordées comme des mondes séparés, mais comme des régimes de manifestation de tensions plus profondes, dont elles ne constituent jamais que des formes historiquement situées d’apparition. +Leur validité n'est donc ni celle d'une ontologie exhaustive, ni celle +d'une simple commodité de classement. Elle doit être mesurée à leur +pouvoir de discernement : là où elles rendent effectivement +intelligibles les scènes étudiées, elles valent comme instruments +critiques ; là où elles n'ajoutent aucun différentiel de lisibilité, +elles doivent être reprises, déplacées ou abandonnées. -Le geste méthodologique est ici essentiel : refuser à la fois la dispersion thématique et l’abstraction pure. Car l’une dissout les tensions dans la multiplicité des cas, tandis que l’autre les neutralise dans des schèmes sans prise ; seule leur articulation permet de maintenir visible ce qui, dans chaque scène, relève du fondement, de l’opération et de l’épreuve. Les tensions n’existent jamais hors des formes où elles se cristallisent ; les scènes sectorielles ne deviennent intelligibles qu’à partir des tensions qui les traversent en profondeur. +Cette distinction est décisive pour comprendre l'architecture du +chapitre. Les analyses qui suivent n'examineront pas des secteurs +autonomes de la vie contemporaine. Elles prendront pour objet des +cristallisations sectorielles : des scènes historiquement situées dans +lesquelles des tensions transversales prennent corps, deviennent +lisibles, se stabilisent partiellement, se déplacent, se recomposent et +produisent des effets différenciés. L'économie, l'écologie, le social, +le politique, le psychique, le médiatique, le technique, le +géopolitique, le cosmopolitique et le culturel ne seront donc pas +abordées comme des mondes séparés, mais comme des régimes de +manifestation de tensions plus profondes, dont elles ne constituent +jamais que des formes historiquement situées d'apparition. -Il faut alors assumer une question que toute telle démarche appelle : pourquoi ces tensions, et pourquoi en nombre fini ? La réponse doit être formulée avec rigueur. Il ne s’agit ni de prétendre épuiser la totalité du réel conflictuel, ni de proposer une taxinomie close de toutes les contradictions possibles. Ce qui est visé ici n’est pas l’exhaustivité ontologique, mais la suffisance opératoire à l’échelle du chapitre. Les dix tensions retenues constituent la bonne coupe analytique pour parcourir les grandes scènes de la vie contemporaine selon une logique archicratique de co-viabilité. Elles sont dites transversales parce qu’aucune ne se laisse réduire à un seul domaine ; irréductibles parce qu’aucune ne peut être résolue par simple suppression d’un de ses pôles ; suffisantes enfin, non parce qu’elles épuiseraient tout le pensable, mais parce qu’elles structurent sans reste décisif la traversée des grandes scènes du chapitre 5. +Le geste méthodologique est ici essentiel : refuser à la fois la +dispersion thématique et l'abstraction pure. Car l'une dissout les +tensions dans la multiplicité des cas, tandis que l'autre les neutralise +dans des schèmes sans prise ; seule leur articulation permet de +maintenir visible ce qui, dans chaque scène, relève du fondement, de +l'opération et de l'épreuve. Les tensions n'existent jamais hors des +formes où elles se cristallisent ; les scènes sectorielles ne deviennent +intelligibles qu'à partir des tensions qui les traversent en profondeur. -Le caractère fini de cette série n’a donc rien de dogmatique. Il répond à une contrainte de calibrage théorique : retenir un nombre de tensions suffisant pour traverser les grandes scènes du contemporain sans dispersion thématique, mais assez resserré pour éviter l’éparpillement taxinomique. Si d’autres lignes de fracture peuvent être dégagées, elles devront justifier qu’elles modifient réellement l’économie d’ensemble du diagnostic, et non qu’elles en dupliquent simplement certaines dimensions sous une formulation voisine. +Il faut alors assumer une question que toute telle démarche appelle : +pourquoi ces tensions, et pourquoi en nombre fini ? La réponse doit être +formulée avec rigueur. Il ne s'agit ni de prétendre épuiser la totalité +du réel conflictuel, ni de proposer une taxinomie close de toutes les +contradictions possibles. Ce qui est visé ici n'est pas l'exhaustivité +ontologique, mais la suffisance opératoire à l'échelle du chapitre. Les +dix tensions retenues constituent la bonne coupe analytique pour +parcourir les grandes scènes de la vie contemporaine selon une logique +archicratique de co-viabilité. Elles sont dites transversales parce +qu'aucune ne se laisse réduire à un seul domaine ; irréductibles parce +qu'aucune ne peut être résolue par simple suppression d'un de ses pôles +; suffisantes enfin, non parce qu'elles épuiseraient tout le pensable, +mais parce qu'elles structurent sans reste décisif la traversée des +grandes scènes du chapitre 5. -D’autres lignes de tension, plus diffuses, existent évidemment. Certaines se nouent entre médiation et présence, entre intériorité et extériorisation, entre immédiateté et formalisation, entre opacité et expression. Elles traversent l’ensemble des configurations analysées sans pouvoir être isolées comme axes autonomes sans perte de consistance. Elles n’ajoutent pas une nouvelle série à celle qui est retenue ici ; elles opèrent à même celle-ci, comme des dimensions immanentes qui en modulent les régimes d’apparition, de circulation et de tenue. Leur reconnaissance ne fragilise donc pas la clôture méthodologique de la liste ; elle en précise le statut. En somme, les dix tensions retenues ne valent pas comme catalogue total, mais comme matrice structurante suffisamment puissante pour rendre lisibles les grandes scènes du contemporain. +Le caractère fini de cette série n'a donc rien de dogmatique. Il répond +à une contrainte de calibrage théorique : retenir un nombre de tensions +suffisant pour traverser les grandes scènes du contemporain sans +dispersion thématique, mais assez resserré pour éviter l'éparpillement +taxinomique. Si d'autres lignes de fracture peuvent être dégagées, elles +devront justifier qu'elles modifient réellement l'économie d'ensemble du +diagnostic, et non qu'elles en dupliquent simplement certaines +dimensions sous une formulation voisine. -Reste alors à les nommer. Notre démarche archicratique en identifie dix, que nous tenons pour transversales dans leur portée, irréductibles dans leur structure, et sectoriellement cristallisées dans les grands champs de la vie contemporaine. +D'autres lignes de tension, plus diffuses, existent évidemment. +Certaines se nouent entre médiation et présence, entre intériorité et +extériorisation, entre immédiateté et formalisation, entre opacité et +expression. Elles traversent l'ensemble des configurations analysées +sans pouvoir être isolées comme axes autonomes sans perte de +consistance. Elles n'ajoutent pas une nouvelle série à celle qui est +retenue ici ; elles opèrent à même celle-ci, comme des dimensions +immanentes qui en modulent les régimes d'apparition, de circulation et +de tenue. Leur reconnaissance ne fragilise donc pas la clôture +méthodologique de la liste ; elle en précise le statut. En somme, les +dix tensions retenues ne valent pas comme catalogue total, mais comme +matrice structurante suffisamment puissante pour rendre lisibles les +grandes scènes du contemporain. -La première est la tension entre subsistance vivante et captation capitalistique. Elle apparaît partout où les conditions matérielles, organiques et symboliques de la vie — eau, sols, temps, soin, énergie, reproduction des milieux — sont traitées comme externalités ou comme réserves disponibles, tandis que les logiques de rentabilité et d’accumulation court-termistes déstructurent les écosystèmes de reproduction. Ce qui s’y joue ne relève pas seulement d’un conflit économique ; c’est la possibilité même de soutenir matériellement l’existence sans en détruire les bases qui y est atteinte. +Reste alors à les nommer. Notre démarche archicratique en identifie dix, +que nous tenons pour transversales dans leur portée, irréductibles dans +leur structure, et sectoriellement cristallisées dans les grands champs +de la vie contemporaine. -La deuxième est la tension entre habitabilité des milieux et destruction extractive. Elle se cristallise partout où les conditions écologiques de la vie — continuité des milieux, rythmes du vivant, équilibres biophysiques, soutenabilité territoriale — sont compromises par des logiques d’exploitation, d’artificialisation, de prédation ou de compensation abstraite. L’enjeu n’est pas seulement la préservation de la nature, mais la possibilité de rendre un monde effectivement habitable. +La première est la tension entre subsistance vivante et captation +capitalistique. Elle apparaît partout où les conditions matérielles, +organiques et symboliques de la vie — eau, sols, temps, soin, énergie, +reproduction des milieux — sont traitées comme externalités ou comme +réserves disponibles, tandis que les logiques de rentabilité et +d'accumulation court-termistes déstructurent les écosystèmes de +reproduction. Ce qui s'y joue ne relève pas seulement d'un conflit +économique ; c'est la possibilité même de soutenir matériellement +l'existence sans en détruire les bases qui y est atteinte. -La troisième est la tension entre reconnaissance commune et différenciation des expériences vécues. Elle se manifeste lorsque les principes d’égalisation formelle tendent à écraser les écarts de condition, les héritages situés, les vulnérabilités différentielles et les expériences inégalement reconnues, tandis que l’affirmation des singularités risque inversement de se fragmenter en régimes disjoints de reconnaissance. Toute scène sociale se trouve ici menacée soit par l’homogénéisation abstraite, soit par la dispersion des mondes vécus. +La deuxième est la tension entre habitabilité des milieux et destruction +extractive. Elle se cristallise partout où les conditions écologiques de +la vie — continuité des milieux, rythmes du vivant, équilibres +biophysiques, soutenabilité territoriale — sont compromises par des +logiques d'exploitation, d'artificialisation, de prédation ou de +compensation abstraite. L'enjeu n'est pas seulement la préservation de +la nature, mais la possibilité de rendre un monde effectivement +habitable. -La quatrième est la tension entre gouvernement de l’ordre et conflictualité politique. Elle apparaît là où les dispositifs de représentation, de décision et de régulation tendent à administrer le dissensus plutôt qu’à l’instituer comme force disputable, tandis que la conflictualité, faute de scène tenable, risque de basculer dans la pure polarisation, l’impuissance ou la rupture. Le problème n’est pas seulement celui du pouvoir ; il est celui des formes dans lesquelles une division collective peut encore devenir politiquement habitable. +La troisième est la tension entre reconnaissance commune et +différenciation des expériences vécues. Elle se manifeste lorsque les +principes d'égalisation formelle tendent à écraser les écarts de +condition, les héritages situés, les vulnérabilités différentielles et +les expériences inégalement reconnues, tandis que l'affirmation des +singularités risque inversement de se fragmenter en régimes disjoints de +reconnaissance. Toute scène sociale se trouve ici menacée soit par +l'homogénéisation abstraite, soit par la dispersion des mondes vécus. -La cinquième est la tension entre captation de l’attention et individuation subjective. Elle traverse les configurations où les sujets sont pris dans des régimes de sollicitation continue, de dispersion attentionnelle, de surcharge psychique et d’injonction à la disponibilité, tandis que les processus d’élaboration, de continuité intérieure et d’individuation se fragilisent. Ce qui s’y joue excède la seule souffrance psychique : c’est la possibilité même pour un sujet de se tenir dans son propre monde. +La quatrième est la tension entre gouvernement de l'ordre et +conflictualité politique. Elle apparaît là où les dispositifs de +représentation, de décision et de régulation tendent à administrer le +dissensus plutôt qu'à l'instituer comme force disputable, tandis que la +conflictualité, faute de scène tenable, risque de basculer dans la pure +polarisation, l'impuissance ou la rupture. Le problème n'est pas +seulement celui du pouvoir ; il est celui des formes dans lesquelles une +division collective peut encore devenir politiquement habitable. -La sixième est la tension entre visibilité médiatique et reconnaissance symbolique. Elle se manifeste là où l’exposition numérique, la circulation des signes et l’occupation de l’espace attentionnel tendent à se substituer à la reconnaissance politique d’un différend. Être visible n’y signifie plus nécessairement être entendu, opposable ou instituable comme porteur de litige. +La cinquième est la tension entre captation de l'attention et +individuation subjective. Elle traverse les configurations où les sujets +sont pris dans des régimes de sollicitation continue, de dispersion +attentionnelle, de surcharge psychique et d'injonction à la +disponibilité, tandis que les processus d'élaboration, de continuité +intérieure et d'individuation se fragilisent. Ce qui s'y joue excède la +seule souffrance psychique : c'est la possibilité même pour un sujet de +se tenir dans son propre monde. -La septième est la tension entre régulation technique et légitimation démocratique. Elle se cristallise lorsque des dispositifs automatisés, des algorithmes, des architectures de code ou des systèmes d’intelligence artificielle prennent en charge des décisions à portée normative sans être insérés dans une scène de validation symbolique et collective. La question n’est plus seulement celle de l’efficacité ; elle est celle de l’origine recevable du pouvoir régulateur. +La sixième est la tension entre visibilité médiatique et reconnaissance +symbolique. Elle se manifeste là où l'exposition numérique, la +circulation des signes et l'occupation de l'espace attentionnel tendent +à se substituer à la reconnaissance politique d'un différend. Être +visible n'y signifie plus nécessairement être entendu, opposable ou +instituable comme porteur de litige. -La huitième est la tension entre multipolarité conflictuelle et disputabilité internationale. Elle se déploie dans un monde où la pluralisation des puissances, des récits stratégiques et des régimes de légitimité fragilise la possibilité d’une scène commune du différend. L’enjeu n’est pas seulement la rivalité entre États, mais la tenue même d’une scène géopolitique disputable. +La septième est la tension entre régulation technique et légitimation +démocratique. Elle se cristallise lorsque des dispositifs automatisés, +des algorithmes, des architectures de code ou des systèmes +d'intelligence artificielle prennent en charge des décisions à portée +normative sans être insérés dans une scène de validation symbolique et +collective. La question n'est plus seulement celle de l'efficacité ; +elle est celle de l'origine recevable du pouvoir régulateur. -La neuvième est la tension entre comparution des sujets et universalités disputables. Elle surgit partout où des existences affectées par des processus globaux — migrants, peuples autochtones, collectifs précarisés, vivants non humains, générations exposées — cherchent à accéder à une scène de recevabilité sans être mutilées par les formats qui les accueillent. Le problème n’est pas seulement celui des droits ; il est celui des formes dans lesquelles un sujet du monde peut paraître. +La huitième est la tension entre multipolarité conflictuelle et +disputabilité internationale. Elle se déploie dans un monde où la +pluralisation des puissances, des récits stratégiques et des régimes de +légitimité fragilise la possibilité d'une scène commune du différend. +L'enjeu n'est pas seulement la rivalité entre États, mais la tenue même +d'une scène géopolitique disputable. -La dixième est la tension entre conflictualité symbolique et devenir civilisationnel. Elle apparaît là où une société ne parvient plus à instituer des formes capables de rendre ses fractures sensibles, transmissibles et disputables, ou bien les abandonne à la saturation expressive, à la patrimonialisation vide ou à la simulation critique. Ce qui s’y joue n’est pas seulement culturel ; c’est la capacité même d’un monde à se soutenir comme monde habitable. +La neuvième est la tension entre comparution des sujets et universalités +disputables. Elle surgit partout où des existences affectées par des +processus globaux — migrants, peuples autochtones, collectifs +précarisés, vivants non humains, générations exposées — cherchent à +accéder à une scène de recevabilité sans être mutilées par les formats +qui les accueillent. Le problème n'est pas seulement celui des droits ; +il est celui des formes dans lesquelles un sujet du monde peut paraître. -Ces tensions ne peuvent être abolies sans que le politique lui-même s’évanouisse. Toute tentative d’harmonisation prématurée, de modélisation lissée ou de pilotage technocratique tend à les escamoter, à les neutraliser, à les rendre indistinctes, parfois même indisputables. C’est pourquoi toute prétention à la durabilité qui ne commence pas par l’identification explicite de ces tensions relève, à nos yeux, d’un processus de désarchicration : non de régulation des dissensus, mais de leur dissimulation. +La dixième est la tension entre conflictualité symbolique et devenir +civilisationnel. Elle apparaît là où une société ne parvient plus à +instituer des formes capables de rendre ses fractures sensibles, +transmissibles et disputables, ou bien les abandonne à la saturation +expressive, à la patrimonialisation vide ou à la simulation critique. Ce +qui s'y joue n'est pas seulement culturel ; c'est la capacité même d'un +monde à se soutenir comme monde habitable. -Le chapitre qui s’ouvre entend prendre à bras-le-corps cette exigence. Il propose une traversée des grandes sphères constitutives de la vie contemporaine — économique, écologique, sociale, médiatique, psychique, politique, technologique, géopolitique, cosmopolitique et culturelle — non comme autant de domaines juxtaposés, mais comme des scènes de cristallisation différenciée de tensions archicratiques transversales. Chacune sera analysée selon la grille tripolaire construite dans les chapitres précédents : d’abord les configurations arcalitaires qui structurent cadres, normes et formes dominantes ; ensuite les forces cratiales qui les traversent, les perturbent ou les captent ; enfin les scènes d’archicration effectivement instituées — ou manquantes — par lesquelles une co-viabilité régulatrice devient possible, empêchée ou simulée. C’est dans cette dernière dimension que se joue décisivement la tenue des mondes : non dans l’intensité des forces ni dans la solidité des structures, mais dans la possibilité qu’elles soient reprises, exposées et disputées à partir de leurs effets. +Ces tensions ne peuvent être abolies sans que le politique lui-même +s'évanouisse. Toute tentative d'harmonisation prématurée, de +modélisation lissée ou de pilotage technocratique tend à les escamoter, +à les neutraliser, à les rendre indistinctes, parfois même +indisputables. C'est pourquoi toute prétention à la durabilité qui ne +commence pas par l'identification explicite de ces tensions relève, à +nos yeux, d'un processus de désarchicration : non de régulation des +dissensus, mais de leur dissimulation. -Il ne s’agira ni d’un inventaire, ni d’un panorama, ni d’un simple survol. Il s’agira de produire une cartographie critique des déséquilibres régulateurs, de mettre au jour leurs symptômes, de décrire leurs régimes de manifestation, et d’indiquer les conditions sous lesquelles ils pourraient encore être symbolisés sans être neutralisés. La co-viabilité n’est ni une fin garantie, ni une propriété stabilisée, ni un état à atteindre une fois pour toutes. Elle désigne un processus d’institution continue, une configuration transitoire de la régulation tensionnelle, toujours menacée, toujours reprise, toujours à refaire. +Le chapitre qui s'ouvre entend prendre à bras-le-corps cette exigence. +Il propose une traversée des grandes sphères constitutives de la vie +contemporaine — économique, écologique, sociale, médiatique, +psychique, politique, technologique, géopolitique, cosmopolitique et +culturelle — non comme autant de domaines juxtaposés, mais comme des +scènes de cristallisation différenciée de tensions archicratiques +transversales. Chacune sera analysée selon la grille tripolaire +construite dans les chapitres précédents : d'abord les configurations +arcalitaires qui structurent cadres, normes et formes dominantes ; +ensuite les forces cratiales qui les traversent, les perturbent ou les +captent ; enfin les scènes d'archicration effectivement instituées — ou manquantes — par lesquelles une co-viabilité régulatrice devient +possible, empêchée ou simulée. C'est dans cette dernière dimension que +se joue décisivement la tenue des mondes : non dans l'intensité des +forces ni dans la solidité des structures, mais dans la possibilité +qu'elles soient reprises, exposées et disputées à partir de leurs +effets. -C’est à ce prix seulement qu’il devient possible de sortir du simulacre de la durabilité pour entrer dans l’exigence irréductible d’une co-viabilité archicratique : située, disputable, différée, incarnée, juste. C’est par l’exploration rigoureuse de ces tensions, scène après scène et champ après champ, que pourra se dessiner l’horizon opératoire d’une archicration de co-viabilité — la première de ces scènes sera celle de l’économie. +Il ne s'agira ni d'un inventaire, ni d'un panorama, ni d'un simple +survol. Il s'agira de produire une cartographie critique des +déséquilibres régulateurs, de mettre au jour leurs symptômes, de décrire +leurs régimes de manifestation, et d'indiquer les conditions sous +lesquelles ils pourraient encore être symbolisés sans être neutralisés. +La co-viabilité n'est ni une fin garantie, ni une propriété stabilisée, +ni un état à atteindre une fois pour toutes. Elle désigne un processus +d'institution continue, une configuration transitoire de la régulation +tensionnelle, toujours menacée, toujours reprise, toujours à refaire. + +C'est à ce prix seulement qu'il devient possible de sortir du simulacre +de la durabilité pour entrer dans l'exigence irréductible d'une +co-viabilité archicratique : située, disputable, différée, incarnée, +juste. C'est par l'exploration rigoureuse de ces tensions, scène après +scène et champ après champ, que pourra se dessiner l'horizon opératoire +d'une archicration de co-viabilité — la première de ces scènes sera +celle de l'économie. ## **5.1 — Tensions économiques : valeur, extraction, captation** -Il suffit parfois d’un refus. Non d’un refus argumenté, débattu, justifié dans un espace où il pourrait être contesté, mais d’un refus automatique, produit par un dispositif qui ne se présente pas comme une décision, mais comme un calcul. Une demande de crédit est déposée. Elle est instruite par une chaîne d’évaluation algorithmique qui agrège des données, produit un score, compare ce score à des seuils prédéfinis, puis tranche. Le résultat tombe : refus. Aucune scène ne permet de comprendre la décision, d’en discuter les critères, d’en contester la pertinence. L’individu ne comparaît devant personne ; il est assigné à un profil. La décision n’est pas seulement défavorable : elle est, pour ainsi dire, arrêtée sans avoir véritablement eu lieu. +Il suffit parfois d'un refus. Non d'un refus argumenté, débattu, +justifié dans un espace où il pourrait être contesté, mais d'un refus +automatique, produit par un dispositif qui ne se présente pas comme une +décision, mais comme un calcul. Une demande de crédit est déposée. Elle +est instruite par une chaîne d'évaluation algorithmique qui agrège des +données, produit un score, compare ce score à des seuils prédéfinis, +puis tranche. Le résultat tombe : refus. Aucune scène ne permet de +comprendre la décision, d'en discuter les critères, d'en contester la +pertinence. L'individu ne comparaît devant personne ; il est assigné à +un profil. La décision n'est pas seulement défavorable : elle est, pour +ainsi dire, arrêtée sans avoir véritablement eu lieu. -Ce type de situation n’est pas un dysfonctionnement marginal de l’économie contemporaine. Il en constitue l’un des symptômes les plus nets. L’enjeu excède l’inégalité d’accès au crédit, et même, plus largement, la seule injustice distributive. C’est la disparition progressive de la scène au profit d’un régime où la décision est produite sans comparution, sans contradiction et sans révision possible. L’économie organise des échanges, mais elle détermine aussi, souvent de manière invisible, les conditions dans lesquelles une existence peut ou non être reconnue comme digne d’être soutenue, financée, prolongée, relancée. Au-delà des ressources, elle distribue des possibilités d’existence. +Ce type de situation n'est pas un dysfonctionnement marginal de +l'économie contemporaine. Il en constitue l'un des symptômes les plus +nets. L'enjeu excède l'inégalité d'accès au crédit, et même, plus +largement, la seule injustice distributive. C'est la disparition +progressive de la scène au profit d'un régime où la décision est +produite sans comparution, sans contradiction et sans révision possible. +L'économie organise des échanges, mais elle détermine aussi, souvent de +manière invisible, les conditions dans lesquelles une existence peut ou +non être reconnue comme digne d'être soutenue, financée, prolongée, +relancée. Au-delà des ressources, elle distribue des possibilités +d'existence. -À partir de ce point, il devient impossible de continuer à penser l’économie comme une sphère neutre, régie par des mécanismes impersonnels et orientée vers une optimisation collective. Elle répartit des biens, mais elle trie en même temps les existences, hiérarchise les contributions et configure les conditions mêmes du vivable. Elle décide moins de ce qui circule que de ce qui compte, moins de ce qui vaut que des formes sous lesquelles quelque chose peut apparaître comme ayant valeur. En ce sens, elle ne constitue pas seulement un domaine de l’organisation sociale ; elle en est l’un des grands opérateurs de qualification implicite. +À partir de ce point, il devient impossible de continuer à penser +l'économie comme une sphère neutre, régie par des mécanismes +impersonnels et orientée vers une optimisation collective. Elle répartit +des biens, mais elle trie en même temps les existences, hiérarchise les +contributions et configure les conditions mêmes du vivable. Elle décide +moins de ce qui circule que de ce qui compte, moins de ce qui vaut que +des formes sous lesquelles quelque chose peut apparaître comme ayant +valeur. En ce sens, elle ne constitue pas seulement un domaine de +l'organisation sociale ; elle en est l'un des grands opérateurs de +qualification implicite. -Cette opération de tri ne s’effectue pas à la surface du système, mais en son cœur. Elle engage d’abord une tension irréductible entre la subsistance vivante et la captation capitalistique. Toute économie, quelle que soit sa forme, doit organiser la reproduction de la vie : alimentation, soin, habitat, transmission, entretien des milieux, continuité intergénérationnelle des existences. Mais, dans les configurations contemporaines, ces conditions de reproduction sont constamment réinscrites dans des logiques d’extraction qui tendent à les subordonner à des impératifs de valorisation. Ce qui soutient la vie devient ce qui est exploité. Les milieux sont transformés en ressources, les relations en flux, les activités en données, les vulnérabilités en niches de marché, les besoins en opportunités d’investissement. La subsistance est ainsi prise dans un mouvement qui la dépasse et la reconfigure selon des critères qui ne sont pas les siens. +Cette opération de tri ne s'effectue pas à la surface du système, mais +en son cœur. Elle engage d'abord une tension irréductible entre la +subsistance vivante et la captation capitalistique. Toute économie, +quelle que soit sa forme, doit organiser la reproduction de la vie : +alimentation, soin, habitat, transmission, entretien des milieux, +continuité intergénérationnelle des existences. Mais, dans les +configurations contemporaines, ces conditions de reproduction sont +constamment réinscrites dans des logiques d'extraction qui tendent à les +subordonner à des impératifs de valorisation. Ce qui soutient la vie +devient ce qui est exploité. Les milieux sont transformés en ressources, +les relations en flux, les activités en données, les vulnérabilités en +niches de marché, les besoins en opportunités d'investissement. La +subsistance est ainsi prise dans un mouvement qui la dépasse et la +reconfigure selon des critères qui ne sont pas les siens. -Il serait erroné de voir dans cette tension une dérive accidentelle du système. Elle constitue l’une de ses structures fondamentales. L’économie moderne ne peut se passer ni de la reproduction de la vie ni de sa mise en valeur. Elle oscille en permanence entre ces deux pôles sans pouvoir les stabiliser. Lorsque la captation l’emporte, la reproduction se fragilise ; lorsqu’on protège celle-ci, la dynamique d’accumulation ralentit, se déplace ou se recompose. Cette oscillation ne trouve pas de résolution. Elle produit des configurations instables, des compromis provisoires, des déplacements constants, des arrangements asymétriques dont la présentation consensuelle masque mal la conflictualité de fond. Le cœur de l’économie contemporaine n’est donc pas l’équilibre, mais une lutte incessante sur les conditions mêmes de ce qui peut continuer à vivre. +Il serait erroné de voir dans cette tension une dérive accidentelle du +système. Elle constitue l'une de ses structures fondamentales. +L'économie moderne ne peut se passer ni de la reproduction de la vie ni +de sa mise en valeur. Elle oscille en permanence entre ces deux pôles +sans pouvoir les stabiliser. Lorsque la captation l'emporte, la +reproduction se fragilise ; lorsqu'on protège celle-ci, la dynamique +d'accumulation ralentit, se déplace ou se recompose. Cette oscillation +ne trouve pas de résolution. Elle produit des configurations instables, +des compromis provisoires, des déplacements constants, des arrangements +asymétriques dont la présentation consensuelle masque mal la +conflictualité de fond. Le cœur de l'économie contemporaine n'est donc +pas l'équilibre, mais une lutte incessante sur les conditions mêmes de +ce qui peut continuer à vivre. -Cette première tension ne suffit pas à rendre compte de la complexité de la scène économique. Elle se double d’une autre incompatibilité, tout aussi décisive, entre le travail vivant et l’abstraction de la valeur. Toute activité humaine est située. Elle s’inscrit dans des contextes, mobilise des savoirs tacites, engage des relations, des gestes, des attentions, des temporalités hétérogènes. Pourtant, pour être reconnue économiquement, elle doit être traduite dans des formats abstraits : salaire, prix, indices, ratios, indicateurs, scores, performances. Cette traduction ne simplifie pas : elle transforme. Elle opère une réduction, une sélection, une hiérarchisation. Elle rend certaines contributions visibles et en invisibilise d’autres. Elle impose un régime de comparabilité à des réalités qui ne se laissent pas ramener sans reste à l’équivalence. +Cette première tension ne suffit pas à rendre compte de la complexité de +la scène économique. Elle se double d'une autre incompatibilité, tout +aussi décisive, entre le travail vivant et l'abstraction de la valeur. +Toute activité humaine est située. Elle s'inscrit dans des contextes, +mobilise des savoirs tacites, engage des relations, des gestes, des +attentions, des temporalités hétérogènes. Pourtant, pour être reconnue +économiquement, elle doit être traduite dans des formats abstraits : +salaire, prix, indices, ratios, indicateurs, scores, performances. Cette +traduction ne simplifie pas : elle transforme. Elle opère une réduction, +une sélection, une hiérarchisation. Elle rend certaines contributions +visibles et en invisibilise d'autres. Elle impose un régime de +comparabilité à des réalités qui ne se laissent pas ramener sans reste à +l'équivalence. -Ainsi, le travail de soin, de reproduction, d’attention, de présence, de réparation — indispensable à la continuité des existences — échappe en grande partie aux circuits de valorisation, ou n’y entre que sous des formes dégradées, sous-payées, épuisantes, symboliquement minorées. À l’inverse, des activités détachées de toute contribution directe à la vie peuvent être massivement valorisées dès lors qu’elles s’inscrivent dans les formats reconnus de solvabilité, de rentabilité, de liquidité ou d’optimisation. L’économie ne reflète donc pas la valeur ; elle impose les formats dans lesquels certaines formes d’existence seulement peuvent compter. Ce qu’elle ne peut pas traduire, elle le laisse s’épuiser, se dégrader ou disparaître. Elle ne constate la valeur qu’en la présélectionnant. +Ainsi, le travail de soin, de reproduction, d'attention, de présence, de +réparation — indispensable à la continuité des existences — échappe +en grande partie aux circuits de valorisation, ou n'y entre que sous des +formes dégradées, sous-payées, épuisantes, symboliquement minorées. À +l'inverse, des activités détachées de toute contribution directe à la +vie peuvent être massivement valorisées dès lors qu'elles s'inscrivent +dans les formats reconnus de solvabilité, de rentabilité, de liquidité +ou d'optimisation. L'économie ne reflète donc pas la valeur ; elle +impose les formats dans lesquels certaines formes d'existence seulement +peuvent compter. Ce qu'elle ne peut pas traduire, elle le laisse +s'épuiser, se dégrader ou disparaître. Elle ne constate la valeur qu'en +la présélectionnant. -Cette invisibilisation est économique, mais aussi symbolique. Elle participe d’une troisième tension, entre la possibilité de symbolisation et la saturation des dispositifs de mesure. L’économie moderne repose sur des médiations symboliques puissantes : la monnaie, le contrat, les unités de compte, les catégories comptables permettent de représenter, de comparer, de rendre intelligibles des activités hétérogènes. Mais lorsque ces médiations se multiplient à l’excès, lorsqu’elles se traduisent par une prolifération de métriques, d’indicateurs, de tableaux de bord, d’évaluations continues, elles cessent de produire du sens. Elles saturent l’espace de représentation sans permettre une véritable compréhension. La mesure se substitue à la signification ; la quantité, à la qualification. L’accumulation de traces tient lieu de jugement, alors qu’elle n’en fait souvent que disperser les conditions. +Cette invisibilisation est économique, mais aussi symbolique. Elle +participe d'une troisième tension, entre la possibilité de symbolisation +et la saturation des dispositifs de mesure. L'économie moderne repose +sur des médiations symboliques puissantes : la monnaie, le contrat, les +unités de compte, les catégories comptables permettent de représenter, +de comparer, de rendre intelligibles des activités hétérogènes. Mais +lorsque ces médiations se multiplient à l'excès, lorsqu'elles se +traduisent par une prolifération de métriques, d'indicateurs, de +tableaux de bord, d'évaluations continues, elles cessent de produire du +sens. Elles saturent l'espace de représentation sans permettre une +véritable compréhension. La mesure se substitue à la signification ; la +quantité, à la qualification. L'accumulation de traces tient lieu de +jugement, alors qu'elle n'en fait souvent que disperser les conditions. -Ce phénomène est renforcé par une transformation décisive des temporalités. Toute scène de régulation suppose un différé : un temps entre l’action et sa qualification, entre la décision et sa contestation, entre la règle et son épreuve. Or l’économie contemporaine tend à réduire ce différé. Les transactions sont instantanées, les évaluations produites en temps réel, les décisions automatisées, les corrections anticipées. Le temps de la contradiction se comprime, parfois jusqu’à disparaître. Ce qui devrait être discuté est décidé en amont, dans des dispositifs qui préemptent les comportements, ajustent les réponses avant même que la question ne puisse être formulée et traitent l’incertitude non comme matière de délibération, mais comme anomalie à absorber. Une économie qui ne laisse plus de temps à la contradiction tend à dissoudre sa propre scène dans la vitesse de ses opérations. +Ce phénomène est renforcé par une transformation décisive des +temporalités. Toute scène de régulation suppose un différé : un temps +entre l'action et sa qualification, entre la décision et sa +contestation, entre la règle et son épreuve. Or l'économie contemporaine +tend à réduire ce différé. Les transactions sont instantanées, les +évaluations produites en temps réel, les décisions automatisées, les +corrections anticipées. Le temps de la contradiction se comprime, +parfois jusqu'à disparaître. Ce qui devrait être discuté est décidé en +amont, dans des dispositifs qui préemptent les comportements, ajustent +les réponses avant même que la question ne puisse être formulée et +traitent l'incertitude non comme matière de délibération, mais comme +anomalie à absorber. Une économie qui ne laisse plus de temps à la +contradiction tend à dissoudre sa propre scène dans la vitesse de ses +opérations. -La scène économique se trouve ainsi prise dans un double mouvement : d’un côté, une intensification des dispositifs de mesure et de calcul ; de l’autre, une réduction des espaces de délibération. L’économie devient ainsi double : saturée d’indicateurs, opaque dans ses décisions. Elle montre beaucoup et expose peu. Elle accumule des données tout en rendant difficile la compréhension des processus qui les produisent. Elle affiche des résultats, mais obscurcit les seuils, les arbitrages et les hiérarchies qui les rendent possibles. Le chiffre ne ment pas nécessairement ; il peut, plus profondément encore, empêcher de voir ce qui devrait être mis en scène. +La scène économique se trouve ainsi prise dans un double mouvement : +d'un côté, une intensification des dispositifs de mesure et de calcul ; +de l'autre, une réduction des espaces de délibération. L'économie +devient ainsi double : saturée d'indicateurs, opaque dans ses décisions. +Elle montre beaucoup et expose peu. Elle accumule des données tout en +rendant difficile la compréhension des processus qui les produisent. +Elle affiche des résultats, mais obscurcit les seuils, les arbitrages et +les hiérarchies qui les rendent possibles. Le chiffre ne ment pas +nécessairement ; il peut, plus profondément encore, empêcher de voir ce +qui devrait être mis en scène. -Ce déplacement a des effets qui dépassent largement le seul champ économique. Il reconfigure les rapports sociaux, transforme les conditions d’accès au travail, redéfinit les formes de reconnaissance et affecte les subjectivités elles-mêmes. Un travailleur de plateforme n’est pas seulement confronté à une précarité économique ; il est inscrit dans un dispositif qui évalue en permanence ses performances, ajuste ses opportunités et produit une image de lui-même à laquelle il ne peut se soustraire. Son activité est traduite en scores, ses interactions en données, ses marges de manœuvre en probabilités. La scène où il pourrait contester cette traduction n’existe pas. Elle est remplacée par un système qui intègre sa contestation comme un paramètre parmi d’autres, comme une friction à gérer et non comme un différend à instruire. Ici, l’enjeu est économique, mais aussi psychique, car l’auto-évaluation devient une forme intériorisée de subordination ; il est également médiatique, car les classements, les notes et les scores fabriquent des régimes de visibilité différentielle qui circulent comme autant de jugements publics miniaturisés. +Ce déplacement a des effets qui dépassent largement le seul champ +économique. Il reconfigure les rapports sociaux, transforme les +conditions d'accès au travail, redéfinit les formes de reconnaissance et +affecte les subjectivités elles-mêmes. Un travailleur de plateforme +n'est pas seulement confronté à une précarité économique ; il est +inscrit dans un dispositif qui évalue en permanence ses performances, +ajuste ses opportunités et produit une image de lui-même à laquelle il +ne peut se soustraire. Son activité est traduite en scores, ses +interactions en données, ses marges de manœuvre en probabilités. La +scène où il pourrait contester cette traduction n'existe pas. Elle est +remplacée par un système qui intègre sa contestation comme un paramètre +parmi d'autres, comme une friction à gérer et non comme un différend à +instruire. Ici, l'enjeu est économique, mais aussi psychique, car +l'auto-évaluation devient une forme intériorisée de subordination ; il +est également médiatique, car les classements, les notes et les scores +fabriquent des régimes de visibilité différentielle qui circulent comme +autant de jugements publics miniaturisés. -Si l’on veut comprendre l’enjeu de ces transformations, il ne suffit pas d’en rester à un niveau de généralité, aussi juste soit-il. L’analyse doit descendre dans les dispositifs eux-mêmes, dans les configurations concrètes où les tensions se cristallisent, se déplacent, se recomposent. Car c’est là, dans ces dispositifs concrets souvent peu visibles, que l’on peut saisir le passage d’une économie comme scène possible de régulation à une économie comme opérateur de désarchicration. +Si l'on veut comprendre l'enjeu de ces transformations, il ne suffit pas +d'en rester à un niveau de généralité, aussi juste soit-il. L'analyse +doit descendre dans les dispositifs eux-mêmes, dans les configurations +concrètes où les tensions se cristallisent, se déplacent, se +recomposent. Car c'est là, dans ces dispositifs concrets souvent peu +visibles, que l'on peut saisir le passage d'une économie comme scène +possible de régulation à une économie comme opérateur de +désarchicration. -Considérons d’abord ce que l’on nomme couramment l’*optimisation fiscale*. L’expression elle-même participe déjà d’un déplacement. Elle suggère une amélioration purement technique, une rationalisation légitime des charges, là où il s’agit en réalité d’un *mécanisme de dissociation des flux économiques par rapport aux scènes politiques dans lesquelles ils pourraient être rendus visibles et contestables*. Une entreprise multinationale organise la circulation de ses profits à travers une architecture juridique et comptable complexe : filiales, holdings, prix de transfert, localisations différenciées des revenus et des coûts, entités écrans, conventions intragroupes, arbitrages entre régimes fiscaux. Le résultat est connu : des bénéfices produits dans un territoire donné échappent en grande partie à l’imposition dans ce même territoire. +Considérons d'abord ce que l'on nomme couramment l'*optimisation +fiscale*. L'expression elle-même participe déjà d'un déplacement. Elle +suggère une amélioration purement technique, une rationalisation +légitime des charges, là où il s'agit en réalité d'un *mécanisme de +dissociation des flux économiques par rapport aux scènes politiques dans +lesquelles ils pourraient être rendus visibles et contestables*. Une +entreprise multinationale organise la circulation de ses profits à +travers une architecture juridique et comptable complexe : filiales, +holdings, prix de transfert, localisations différenciées des revenus et +des coûts, entités écrans, conventions intragroupes, arbitrages entre +régimes fiscaux. Le résultat est connu : des bénéfices produits dans un +territoire donné échappent en grande partie à l'imposition dans ce même +territoire. -Mais ce qui importe ici n’est pas seulement la perte de recettes fiscales, aussi significative soit-elle. C’est la transformation du régime de visibilité. La décision de contribution — qui devrait relever d’une scène publique, où la question du partage, de la redistribution, de la solidarité et de la dette sociale est débattue — est déplacée dans un espace technique, fragmenté, difficilement accessible. Les règles existent, les lois sont votées, les administrations interviennent, mais leur mise en œuvre se trouve contournée par des dispositifs qui en exploitent les interstices. La scène fiscale ne disparaît pas ; elle est captée. Elle subsiste formellement, mais elle est privée de sa capacité effective de régulation. Le dissensus qu’elle devrait accueillir est déplacé ailleurs : dans des négociations opaques, dans des arbitrages silencieux, dans des rapports de force invisibles. +Mais ce qui importe ici n'est pas seulement la perte de recettes +fiscales, aussi significative soit-elle. C'est la transformation du +régime de visibilité. La décision de contribution — qui devrait +relever d'une scène publique, où la question du partage, de la +redistribution, de la solidarité et de la dette sociale est débattue — est déplacée dans un espace technique, fragmenté, difficilement +accessible. Les règles existent, les lois sont votées, les +administrations interviennent, mais leur mise en œuvre se trouve +contournée par des dispositifs qui en exploitent les interstices. La +scène fiscale ne disparaît pas ; elle est captée. Elle subsiste +formellement, mais elle est privée de sa capacité effective de +régulation. Le dissensus qu'elle devrait accueillir est déplacé ailleurs +: dans des négociations opaques, dans des arbitrages silencieux, dans +des rapports de force invisibles. -Cette captation n’est pas politiquement neutre. Elle protège des intérêts puissants, socialement situés, matériellement armés, juridiquement outillés. Elle n’est pas l’effet abstrait d’une complexité malheureuse ; elle reconduit une asymétrie où certains acteurs disposent des moyens d’échapper à la scène commune tandis que d’autres en restent captifs. Ce cas est ainsi exemplaire d’une captation structurelle : la scène n’est pas supprimée ; elle est maintenue comme façade, tandis que les opérations décisives se déroulent hors de son champ. Elle continue d’exister pour ceux qui n’ont pas les moyens de s’en extraire, tandis que d’autres peuvent s’en affranchir. La règle n’est pas abolie ; elle est différenciée dans son application. L’égalité formelle masque une inégalité d’accès à la scène elle-même. Dans une scène captée, la régulation ne manque pas de forme ; elle manque de prise. +Cette captation n'est pas politiquement neutre. Elle protège des +intérêts puissants, socialement situés, matériellement armés, +juridiquement outillés. Elle n'est pas l'effet abstrait d'une complexité +malheureuse ; elle reconduit une asymétrie où certains acteurs disposent +des moyens d'échapper à la scène commune tandis que d'autres en restent +captifs. Ce cas est ainsi exemplaire d'une captation structurelle : la +scène n'est pas supprimée ; elle est maintenue comme façade, tandis que +les opérations décisives se déroulent hors de son champ. Elle continue +d'exister pour ceux qui n'ont pas les moyens de s'en extraire, tandis +que d'autres peuvent s'en affranchir. La règle n'est pas abolie ; elle +est différenciée dans son application. L'égalité formelle masque une +inégalité d'accès à la scène elle-même. Dans une scène captée, la +régulation ne manque pas de forme ; elle manque de prise. -Un autre type de configuration apparaît avec les dispositifs de notation et de scoring qui structurent aujourd’hui une part croissante des activités économiques. Prenons le cas d’un travailleur de plateforme de livraison. Chaque course effectuée donne lieu à une évaluation : temps de réponse, rapidité d’exécution, satisfaction du client, conformité aux instructions, taux d’acceptation des courses, fréquence de connexion. Ces données sont agrégées dans un score qui conditionne l’accès futur aux missions. Une baisse du score peut entraîner une diminution des opportunités, un déclassement dans l’allocation des courses, voire une exclusion pure et simple du système. +Un autre type de configuration apparaît avec les dispositifs de notation +et de scoring qui structurent aujourd'hui une part croissante des +activités économiques. Prenons le cas d'un travailleur de plateforme de +livraison. Chaque course effectuée donne lieu à une évaluation : temps +de réponse, rapidité d'exécution, satisfaction du client, conformité aux +instructions, taux d'acceptation des courses, fréquence de connexion. +Ces données sont agrégées dans un score qui conditionne l'accès futur +aux missions. Une baisse du score peut entraîner une diminution des +opportunités, un déclassement dans l'allocation des courses, voire une +exclusion pure et simple du système. -Ce dispositif mesure une performance, mais surtout il instaure un régime de régulation sans scène. La décision — maintenir, dégrader, exclure — est prise à partir d’un ensemble de critères qui ne sont ni explicités, ni véritablement discutables, ni aisément contextualisables. Le travailleur ne comparaît devant aucune instance où il pourrait contester l’évaluation, expliquer une situation, demander une révision contradictoire. Il est confronté à un résultat, non à un processus. La scène est ici non pas captée, mais oblitérée. Elle n’existe pas, même sous forme simulée. Elle est remplacée par un calcul qui incorpore en lui-même la décision. Là où la captation maintient la façade d’une scène déplacée, l’oblitération supprime jusqu’à la comparution minimale du litige. +Ce dispositif mesure une performance, mais surtout il instaure un régime +de régulation sans scène. La décision — maintenir, dégrader, exclure — est prise à partir d'un ensemble de critères qui ne sont ni +explicités, ni véritablement discutables, ni aisément contextualisables. +Le travailleur ne comparaît devant aucune instance où il pourrait +contester l'évaluation, expliquer une situation, demander une révision +contradictoire. Il est confronté à un résultat, non à un processus. La +scène est ici non pas captée, mais oblitérée. Elle n'existe pas, même +sous forme simulée. Elle est remplacée par un calcul qui incorpore en +lui-même la décision. Là où la captation maintient la façade d'une scène +déplacée, l'oblitération supprime jusqu'à la comparution minimale du +litige. -Cette oblitération s’accompagne d’une transformation des subjectivités. Le travailleur n’est plus seulement évalué ; il est invité à s’auto-ajuster en permanence à des critères qu’il ne maîtrise pas. Il intériorise les normes du dispositif, anticipe les attentes, modifie son comportement pour optimiser son score, surveille ses propres réactions, redoute l’écart statistique. La régulation ne passe plus par une confrontation explicite, mais par une modulation continue des conduites. La tension entre travail vivant et abstraction de la valeur prend ici une forme particulièrement aiguë : ce qui est évalué n’est pas l’activité en tant que telle, mais sa conformité à des indicateurs qui en redéfinissent le sens. Le geste n’est plus reconnu pour ce qu’il soutient ; il est jugé pour ce qu’il signale dans un système de notation. L’économie produit ici une forme de gouvernement par calcul qui agit tout autant sur les revenus que sur les conduites. +Cette oblitération s'accompagne d'une transformation des subjectivités. +Le travailleur n'est plus seulement évalué ; il est invité à +s'auto-ajuster en permanence à des critères qu'il ne maîtrise pas. Il +intériorise les normes du dispositif, anticipe les attentes, modifie son +comportement pour optimiser son score, surveille ses propres réactions, +redoute l'écart statistique. La régulation ne passe plus par une +confrontation explicite, mais par une modulation continue des conduites. +La tension entre travail vivant et abstraction de la valeur prend ici +une forme particulièrement aiguë : ce qui est évalué n'est pas +l'activité en tant que telle, mais sa conformité à des indicateurs qui +en redéfinissent le sens. Le geste n'est plus reconnu pour ce qu'il +soutient ; il est jugé pour ce qu'il signale dans un système de +notation. L'économie produit ici une forme de gouvernement par calcul +qui agit tout autant sur les revenus que sur les conduites. -Entre ces deux configurations — captation et oblitération — se déploient d’autres formes de désarchicration plus ambiguës, où la scène semble exister mais ne produit pas les effets attendus. C’est le cas, par exemple, de nombreux dispositifs de responsabilité sociale des entreprises ou de reporting environnemental, social et de gouvernance. Ces dispositifs donnent l’apparence d’une prise en compte des impacts sociaux et environnementaux, d’une ouverture à la critique, d’une volonté de transparence. Des indicateurs sont publiés, des engagements sont affichés, des audits sont réalisés, des chartes sont signées, des récits de responsabilité sont mis en circulation. +Entre ces deux configurations — captation et oblitération — se +déploient d'autres formes de désarchicration plus ambiguës, où la scène +semble exister mais ne produit pas les effets attendus. C'est le cas, +par exemple, de nombreux dispositifs de responsabilité sociale des +entreprises ou de reporting environnemental, social et de gouvernance. +Ces dispositifs donnent l'apparence d'une prise en compte des impacts +sociaux et environnementaux, d'une ouverture à la critique, d'une +volonté de transparence. Des indicateurs sont publiés, des engagements +sont affichés, des audits sont réalisés, des chartes sont signées, des +récits de responsabilité sont mis en circulation. -Mais la question décisive est celle de la capacité de ces dispositifs à transformer effectivement les pratiques. Or, dans bien des cas, ils relèvent d’une forme de simulation de scène. Les informations sont produites, mais leur interprétation reste largement interne ; les engagements sont formulés sans que leur mise en œuvre soit réellement contraignante ; les critiques sont possibles, mais leur prise sur les décisions demeure faible, indirecte, souvent différée à l’excès. La scène existe, mais elle est désactivée dans sa fonction régulatrice. Elle donne à voir sans permettre d’agir ; elle enregistre la critique pour mieux l’empêcher de mordre. Elle expose sans ouvrir à la contradiction effective. Dans une scène simulée, quelque chose du théâtre subsiste — formats, procédures, signes d’ouverture, vocabulaire de responsabilité — mais ce théâtre est structuré de telle sorte que le dissensus ne puisse affecter substantiellement la structure. Le conflit y est accueilli à condition de demeurer inoffensif, quantifiable et sans effet contraignant. +Mais la question décisive est celle de la capacité de ces dispositifs à +transformer effectivement les pratiques. Or, dans bien des cas, ils +relèvent d'une forme de simulation de scène. Les informations sont +produites, mais leur interprétation reste largement interne ; les +engagements sont formulés sans que leur mise en œuvre soit réellement +contraignante ; les critiques sont possibles, mais leur prise sur les +décisions demeure faible, indirecte, souvent différée à l'excès. La +scène existe, mais elle est désactivée dans sa fonction régulatrice. +Elle donne à voir sans permettre d'agir ; elle enregistre la critique +pour mieux l'empêcher de mordre. Elle expose sans ouvrir à la +contradiction effective. Dans une scène simulée, quelque chose du +théâtre subsiste — formats, procédures, signes d'ouverture, +vocabulaire de responsabilité — mais ce théâtre est structuré de telle +sorte que le dissensus ne puisse affecter substantiellement la +structure. Le conflit y est accueilli à condition de demeurer +inoffensif, quantifiable et sans effet contraignant. -Il serait pourtant erroné de conclure à une disparition totale des possibilités de « réarchicration » dans le champ économique. Certaines expériences montrent que des scènes peuvent être instituées, même de manière fragile et partielle. Les coopératives de production, par exemple, organisent des formes de gouvernance où les travailleurs participent aux décisions, où les critères de répartition des revenus sont discutés, où les orientations de l’activité peuvent être débattues, où les arbitrages ne sont pas entièrement soustraits à ceux qui en subissent les effets. Ces dispositifs ne suppriment pas les tensions ; ils les rendent visibles et susceptibles d’être prises en charge. Ils constituent des scènes faibles mais réelles, où la régulation ne se réduit pas à une application automatique de règles, mais implique une délibération, un différé et une conflictualité effectivement instruite. +Il serait pourtant erroné de conclure à une disparition totale des +possibilités de « réarchicration » dans le champ économique. Certaines +expériences montrent que des scènes peuvent être instituées, même de +manière fragile et partielle. Les coopératives de production, par +exemple, organisent des formes de gouvernance où les travailleurs +participent aux décisions, où les critères de répartition des revenus +sont discutés, où les orientations de l'activité peuvent être débattues, +où les arbitrages ne sont pas entièrement soustraits à ceux qui en +subissent les effets. Ces dispositifs ne suppriment pas les tensions ; +ils les rendent visibles et susceptibles d'être prises en charge. Ils +constituent des scènes faibles mais réelles, où la régulation ne se +réduit pas à une application automatique de règles, mais implique une +délibération, un différé et une conflictualité effectivement instruite. -Il faut toutefois éviter ici toute idéalisation. Ces scènes faibles ne sont pas des havres hors pouvoir. Elles sont traversées de dissymétries, de contraintes de marché, de tensions entre autonomie interne et dépendances externes. Mais c’est précisément ce qui leur donne leur intérêt archicratique : elles ne valent pas parce qu’elles aboliraient la conflictualité ; elles valent parce qu’elles obligent à la traiter au lieu de la dissoudre dans des automatismes opaques. De même, certaines initiatives locales — monnaies complémentaires, circuits courts, budgets participatifs à dimension économique, formes territorialisées d’économie sociale et solidaire — ne valent pas d’abord comme vitrines vertueuses, mais comme tentatives fragiles de réancrer la décision économique dans un espace de comparution. Elles cherchent à reconnecter les flux à des communautés situées, à rendre visibles les effets des choix de consommation, d’investissement ou de priorisation, et à rouvrir des espaces où la valeur cesse d’aller de soi. Leur force n’est pas d’offrir une alternative morale pure ; elle est de réintroduire, à petite échelle, la possibilité que la valeur redevienne une question litigieuse. +Il faut toutefois éviter ici toute idéalisation. Ces scènes faibles ne +sont pas des havres hors pouvoir. Elles sont traversées de dissymétries, +de contraintes de marché, de tensions entre autonomie interne et +dépendances externes. Mais c'est précisément ce qui leur donne leur +intérêt archicratique : elles ne valent pas parce qu'elles aboliraient +la conflictualité ; elles valent parce qu'elles obligent à la traiter au +lieu de la dissoudre dans des automatismes opaques. De même, certaines +initiatives locales — monnaies complémentaires, circuits courts, +budgets participatifs à dimension économique, formes territorialisées +d'économie sociale et solidaire — ne valent pas d'abord comme vitrines +vertueuses, mais comme tentatives fragiles de réancrer la décision +économique dans un espace de comparution. Elles cherchent à reconnecter +les flux à des communautés situées, à rendre visibles les effets des +choix de consommation, d'investissement ou de priorisation, et à rouvrir +des espaces où la valeur cesse d'aller de soi. Leur force n'est pas +d'offrir une alternative morale pure ; elle est de réintroduire, à +petite échelle, la possibilité que la valeur redevienne une question +litigieuse. -Ces différents cas — captation, oblitération, simulation, émergence — ne doivent pas être compris comme des catégories exclusives et parfaitement séparées. Dans la réalité, les configurations économiques combinent souvent plusieurs de ces régimes. Une plateforme peut, par exemple, oblitérer la scène pour les travailleurs tout en simulant une forme de participation pour les utilisateurs ; une entreprise peut capter la scène fiscale tout en affichant des dispositifs de responsabilité sociale ; une coopérative peut ouvrir un espace de délibération interne tout en demeurant contrainte par des logiques de marché externes qui en limitent la portée. Une même scène peut donc être captée à un niveau et active à un autre ; simulée dans sa forme générale et effective dans certains espaces localisés ; oblitérée pour certains acteurs et partiellement accessible à d’autres. +Ces différents cas — captation, oblitération, simulation, émergence — ne doivent pas être compris comme des catégories exclusives et +parfaitement séparées. Dans la réalité, les configurations économiques +combinent souvent plusieurs de ces régimes. Une plateforme peut, par +exemple, oblitérer la scène pour les travailleurs tout en simulant une +forme de participation pour les utilisateurs ; une entreprise peut +capter la scène fiscale tout en affichant des dispositifs de +responsabilité sociale ; une coopérative peut ouvrir un espace de +délibération interne tout en demeurant contrainte par des logiques de +marché externes qui en limitent la portée. Une même scène peut donc être +captée à un niveau et active à un autre ; simulée dans sa forme générale +et effective dans certains espaces localisés ; oblitérée pour certains +acteurs et partiellement accessible à d'autres. -Il convient toutefois de distinguer avec plus de netteté les degrés d’existence de la scène. Entre une archicration effective, une scène affaiblie, une scène simulée et une situation de pure non-comparution, il n’y a pas seulement une différence d’intensité, mais une différence de statut. Toute dégradation scénique ne relève donc pas du même régime : certaines configurations maintiennent encore une prise, si faible soit-elle ; d’autres reconduisent seulement l’apparence de l’épreuve ; d’autres enfin soustraient entièrement la régulation à toute comparution. C’est à cette hiérarchisation qu’il faut mesurer la portée réelle ou fictive des scènes contemporaines. +Il convient toutefois de distinguer avec plus de netteté les degrés +d'existence de la scène. Entre une archicration effective, une scène +affaiblie, une scène simulée et une situation de pure non-comparution, +il n'y a pas seulement une différence d'intensité, mais une différence +de statut. Toute dégradation scénique ne relève donc pas du même régime +: certaines configurations maintiennent encore une prise, si faible +soit-elle ; d'autres reconduisent seulement l'apparence de l'épreuve ; +d'autres enfin soustraient entièrement la régulation à toute +comparution. C'est à cette hiérarchisation qu'il faut mesurer la portée +réelle ou fictive des scènes contemporaines. -Ce caractère composite des situations impose de ne pas figer la typologie. Il ne s’agit pas de classer les dispositifs une fois pour toutes, mais de saisir les mouvements par lesquels ils se transforment, les tensions qui les traversent, les possibilités qu’ils ouvrent ou qu’ils ferment. Une typologie utile n’est pas celle qui simplifie le réel jusqu’à le rendre artificiellement net ; c’est celle qui permet de comprendre comment les régimes se superposent, se neutralisent, se fissurent ou se déplacent. La diacritique archicratique doit donc demeurer mobile : distinguer fortement, sans rigidifier abusivement. +Ce caractère composite des situations impose de ne pas figer la +typologie. Il ne s'agit pas de classer les dispositifs une fois pour +toutes, mais de saisir les mouvements par lesquels ils se transforment, +les tensions qui les traversent, les possibilités qu'ils ouvrent ou +qu'ils ferment. Une typologie utile n'est pas celle qui simplifie le +réel jusqu'à le rendre artificiellement net ; c'est celle qui permet de +comprendre comment les régimes se superposent, se neutralisent, se +fissurent ou se déplacent. La diacritique archicratique doit donc +demeurer mobile : distinguer fortement, sans rigidifier abusivement. -C’est dans ces variations que se joue la question de la co-viabilité. Une économie entièrement captée ou oblitérée ne laisse place à aucune régulation explicite des tensions qui la traversent. Elle tend à produire des formes d’instabilité latente, des accumulations de conflits non traités, des déplacements de la violence vers des espaces invisibles, une fatigue diffuse des subjectivités sommées de s’ajuster sans comprendre, et une prolifération de classements qui fonctionnent aussi comme des régimes quasi médiatiques de visibilité : être bien noté, bien scoré, bien évalué, c’est apparaître ; être rétrogradé, c’est s’effacer. À l’inverse, une économie qui parvient à instituer, même partiellement, des scènes de régulation peut transformer ces tensions en occasions de réajustement, en processus d’apprentissage collectif, en formes de conflictualité habitable. Elle ne supprime pas le différend ; elle lui donne un théâtre praticable. +C'est dans ces variations que se joue la question de la co-viabilité. +Une économie entièrement captée ou oblitérée ne laisse place à aucune +régulation explicite des tensions qui la traversent. Elle tend à +produire des formes d'instabilité latente, des accumulations de conflits +non traités, des déplacements de la violence vers des espaces +invisibles, une fatigue diffuse des subjectivités sommées de s'ajuster +sans comprendre, et une prolifération de classements qui fonctionnent +aussi comme des régimes quasi médiatiques de visibilité : être bien +noté, bien scoré, bien évalué, c'est apparaître ; être rétrogradé, c'est +s'effacer. À l'inverse, une économie qui parvient à instituer, même +partiellement, des scènes de régulation peut transformer ces tensions en +occasions de réajustement, en processus d'apprentissage collectif, en +formes de conflictualité habitable. Elle ne supprime pas le différend ; +elle lui donne un théâtre praticable. -De telles scènes ne vont pas de soi. Elles supposent des dispositifs institutionnels, des cadres juridiques, des temporalités adaptées. Elles impliquent également une redistribution du pouvoir, une reconnaissance des asymétries, une capacité à accueillir des formes de conflictualité qui ne peuvent être réduites à des différences d’opinion ou à des préférences individuelles. Elles exigent, en d’autres termes, une transformation profonde des modes de régulation économique. L’économie ne devient pas archicratique parce qu’elle est plus transparente ; elle le devient lorsqu’elle accepte que ses critères, ses hiérarchies et ses arbitrages soient exposés à une contradiction située, soutenue et révisable. Or c’est précisément ce que refusent, dans les faits, les configurations où les intérêts dominants disposent des moyens techniques, juridiques et organisationnels de soustraire leurs décisions à la scène commune. +De telles scènes ne vont pas de soi. Elles supposent des dispositifs +institutionnels, des cadres juridiques, des temporalités adaptées. Elles +impliquent également une redistribution du pouvoir, une reconnaissance +des asymétries, une capacité à accueillir des formes de conflictualité +qui ne peuvent être réduites à des différences d'opinion ou à des +préférences individuelles. Elles exigent, en d'autres termes, une +transformation profonde des modes de régulation économique. L'économie +ne devient pas archicratique parce qu'elle est plus transparente ; elle +le devient lorsqu'elle accepte que ses critères, ses hiérarchies et ses +arbitrages soient exposés à une contradiction située, soutenue et +révisable. Or c'est précisément ce que refusent, dans les faits, les +configurations où les intérêts dominants disposent des moyens +techniques, juridiques et organisationnels de soustraire leurs décisions +à la scène commune. -Cela est rendu plus difficile encore par les transformations contemporaines de l’économie. L’accélération des flux, la complexification des dispositifs, la déterritorialisation des activités tendent à éloigner les décisions des lieux où leurs effets se font sentir. Les chaînes de production et de valorisation s’étendent à l’échelle globale, tandis que les scènes politiques restent largement organisées à des échelles nationales ou locales. Cette dissociation entre les niveaux de décision et les niveaux d’impact produit une tension supplémentaire, entre souverainetés territoriales et interdépendances globales, qui traverse l’ensemble des configurations économiques. Elle désigne moins une contradiction secondaire qu’un seuil à partir duquel les scènes existantes deviennent structurellement trop étroites pour les réalités qu’elles prétendent traiter. +Cela est rendu plus difficile encore par les transformations +contemporaines de l'économie. L'accélération des flux, la +complexification des dispositifs, la déterritorialisation des activités +tendent à éloigner les décisions des lieux où leurs effets se font +sentir. Les chaînes de production et de valorisation s'étendent à +l'échelle globale, tandis que les scènes politiques restent largement +organisées à des échelles nationales ou locales. Cette dissociation +entre les niveaux de décision et les niveaux d'impact produit une +tension supplémentaire, entre souverainetés territoriales et +interdépendances globales, qui traverse l'ensemble des configurations +économiques. Elle désigne moins une contradiction secondaire qu'un seuil +à partir duquel les scènes existantes deviennent structurellement trop +étroites pour les réalités qu'elles prétendent traiter. -Cette tension se manifeste de manière particulièrement nette dans les questions liées aux ressources naturelles, à l’énergie, aux infrastructures, aux chaînes logistiques et extractives. Les choix économiques opérés dans un espace donné ont des effets qui débordent largement cet espace, affectent des populations éloignées, transforment des milieux à distance, déplacent des coûts sociaux et écologiques vers d’autres territoires. Pourtant, les scènes où ces choix sont discutés restent souvent limitées à des cadres institutionnels qui ne correspondent pas à l’ampleur réelle des enjeux. La régulation se trouve ainsi prise dans un décalage entre l’échelle des problèmes et l’échelle des dispositifs qui prétendent les traiter. Ce décalage n’est pas seulement institutionnel ; il est archicratique : il marque l’écart entre des tensions réelles et la petitesse relative des scènes disponibles. +Cette tension se manifeste de manière particulièrement nette dans les +questions liées aux ressources naturelles, à l'énergie, aux +infrastructures, aux chaînes logistiques et extractives. Les choix +économiques opérés dans un espace donné ont des effets qui débordent +largement cet espace, affectent des populations éloignées, transforment +des milieux à distance, déplacent des coûts sociaux et écologiques vers +d'autres territoires. Pourtant, les scènes où ces choix sont discutés +restent souvent limitées à des cadres institutionnels qui ne +correspondent pas à l'ampleur réelle des enjeux. La régulation se trouve +ainsi prise dans un décalage entre l'échelle des problèmes et l'échelle +des dispositifs qui prétendent les traiter. Ce décalage n'est pas +seulement institutionnel ; il est archicratique : il marque l'écart +entre des tensions réelles et la petitesse relative des scènes +disponibles. -Disons-le clairement : l’économie contemporaine n’est pas seulement injuste ; elle tend aussi à soustraire ses décisions les plus décisives à toute scène où elles pourraient devenir visibles, puis réellement contestables. Ce qui la caractérise n’est ni l’absence de normes, ni le défaut de calcul, ni le manque de régulation. C’est le fait que normes, calculs et régulations opèrent souvent sans comparaître comme tels. Sa violence spécifique ne tient donc pas seulement à la production des écarts, mais au fait qu’elle empêche ces écarts de devenir pleinement litigieux. +Disons-le clairement : l'économie contemporaine n'est pas seulement +injuste ; elle tend aussi à soustraire ses décisions les plus décisives +à toute scène où elles pourraient devenir visibles, puis réellement +contestables. Ce qui la caractérise n'est ni l'absence de normes, ni le +défaut de calcul, ni le manque de régulation. C'est le fait que normes, +calculs et régulations opèrent souvent sans comparaître comme tels. Sa +violence spécifique ne tient donc pas seulement à la production des +écarts, mais au fait qu'elle empêche ces écarts de devenir pleinement +litigieux. -Ce décalage ne concerne pas seulement les ressources matérielles ; il affecte également les subjectivités. Les transformations économiques contemporaines modifient les expériences du travail, les rapports au temps, les formes de reconnaissance, les régimes d’attention. Elles produisent des formes d’incertitude, de précarité, de compétition et d’auto-surveillance qui reconfigurent les manières d’habiter le monde et de se percevoir soi-même. La tension entre travail vivant et abstraction de la valeur se double d’une tension psychique, entre l’expérience vécue et les formats dans lesquels elle est traduite, notée, comparée. Les individus sont pris dans des dispositifs qui les évaluent sans cesse, les classent, les hiérarchisent, sans toujours leur offrir les moyens de comprendre ou de contester ces évaluations. Ce qui se joue ici relève autant de l’économie que de la fabrication contemporaine d’un sujet sommé de se gérer lui-même comme un portefeuille de performances. +Ce décalage ne concerne pas seulement les ressources matérielles ; il +affecte également les subjectivités. Les transformations économiques +contemporaines modifient les expériences du travail, les rapports au +temps, les formes de reconnaissance, les régimes d'attention. Elles +produisent des formes d'incertitude, de précarité, de compétition et +d'auto-surveillance qui reconfigurent les manières d'habiter le monde et +de se percevoir soi-même. La tension entre travail vivant et abstraction +de la valeur se double d'une tension psychique, entre l'expérience vécue +et les formats dans lesquels elle est traduite, notée, comparée. Les +individus sont pris dans des dispositifs qui les évaluent sans cesse, +les classent, les hiérarchisent, sans toujours leur offrir les moyens de +comprendre ou de contester ces évaluations. Ce qui se joue ici relève +autant de l'économie que de la fabrication contemporaine d'un sujet +sommé de se gérer lui-même comme un portefeuille de performances. -Ainsi, l’économie ne peut être pensée isolément. Elle traverse et reconfigure les autres dimensions de la vie collective. Elle affecte les rapports sociaux, les formes politiques, les conditions écologiques, les expériences subjectives, les régimes de visibilité publique. Elle constitue un nœud de tensions où se rencontrent et se recomposent des incompatibilités qui dépassent largement son périmètre apparent. C’est pourquoi la question de sa réarchicration ne peut être réduite à des ajustements techniques ou à des réformes marginales. Elle engage une réflexion sur les conditions mêmes de la mise en scène des conflits qui la traversent. Elle suppose de repenser les échelles de régulation, les formes de représentation, les temporalités de la décision, les médiations de visibilité. Elle implique de reconnaître que l’économie n’est pas un domaine à optimiser, mais un champ à politiser au sens fort, c’est-à-dire à rendre traversable par des scènes où les tensions peuvent être exposées au conflit et susceptibles d’être transformées. +Ainsi, l'économie ne peut être pensée isolément. Elle traverse et +reconfigure les autres dimensions de la vie collective. Elle affecte les +rapports sociaux, les formes politiques, les conditions écologiques, les +expériences subjectives, les régimes de visibilité publique. Elle +constitue un nœud de tensions où se rencontrent et se recomposent des +incompatibilités qui dépassent largement son périmètre apparent. C'est +pourquoi la question de sa réarchicration ne peut être réduite à des +ajustements techniques ou à des réformes marginales. Elle engage une +réflexion sur les conditions mêmes de la mise en scène des conflits qui +la traversent. Elle suppose de repenser les échelles de régulation, les +formes de représentation, les temporalités de la décision, les +médiations de visibilité. Elle implique de reconnaître que l'économie +n'est pas un domaine à optimiser, mais un champ à politiser au sens +fort, c'est-à-dire à rendre traversable par des scènes où les tensions +peuvent être exposées au conflit et susceptibles d'être transformées. -Si l’on pousse jusqu’au bout les implications de ce qui précède, une thèse s’impose, qu’il faut formuler sans atténuation : l’économie contemporaine répartit inégalement la valeur et détermine en amont les conditions mêmes de son apparition. Elle organise des inégalités, mais elle configure aussi les formats de visibilité qui rendent certaines existences comptables et en relèguent d’autres hors du champ du calcul. En ce sens, elle n’enregistre pas ce qui vaut ; elle impose les conditions dans lesquelles seulement certaines formes de vie peuvent compter. +Si l'on pousse jusqu'au bout les implications de ce qui précède, une +thèse s'impose, qu'il faut formuler sans atténuation : l'économie +contemporaine répartit inégalement la valeur et détermine en amont les +conditions mêmes de son apparition. Elle organise des inégalités, mais +elle configure aussi les formats de visibilité qui rendent certaines +existences comptables et en relèguent d'autres hors du champ du calcul. +En ce sens, elle n'enregistre pas ce qui vaut ; elle impose les +conditions dans lesquelles seulement certaines formes de vie peuvent +compter. -Cette opération de configuration ne relève pas d’un simple biais ou d’une défaillance du système. Elle constitue une fonction structurale. L’économie moderne produit ses propres critères de valorisation, les stabilise dans des dispositifs, puis les diffuse comme s’ils relevaient d’une rationalité neutre. Ce qui apparaît alors comme une évidence — qu’une activité vaut tant, qu’une autre vaut moins, qu’un territoire mérite tel investissement, qu’un autre peut être sacrifié — est le résultat d’une construction historiquement située, mais présentée comme allant de soi. La naturalisation de ces critères constitue l’un des ressorts majeurs de la désarchicration : en rendant invisibles les conditions de production de la valeur, elle rend difficile, voire impossible, leur contestation. Elle transforme le choix en nécessité, l’arbitrage en procédure, l’asymétrie en évidence. +Cette opération de configuration ne relève pas d'un simple biais ou +d'une défaillance du système. Elle constitue une fonction structurale. +L'économie moderne produit ses propres critères de valorisation, les +stabilise dans des dispositifs, puis les diffuse comme s'ils relevaient +d'une rationalité neutre. Ce qui apparaît alors comme une évidence — qu'une activité vaut tant, qu'une autre vaut moins, qu'un territoire +mérite tel investissement, qu'un autre peut être sacrifié — est le +résultat d'une construction historiquement située, mais présentée comme +allant de soi. La naturalisation de ces critères constitue l'un des +ressorts majeurs de la désarchicration : en rendant invisibles les +conditions de production de la valeur, elle rend difficile, voire +impossible, leur contestation. Elle transforme le choix en nécessité, +l'arbitrage en procédure, l'asymétrie en évidence. -C’est ici que la tension entre symbolisation et saturation prend toute sa portée. Une économie qui symbolise permet de rendre visibles les contributions, de les inscrire dans des récits, de les relier à des formes de reconnaissance. Une économie saturée, au contraire, produit une accumulation de données qui ne se laisse pas interpréter comme un ensemble cohérent. Elle donne l’illusion d’une transparence totale — tout est mesuré, tout est enregistré, tout semble objectivé — alors même que le sens de ces mesures échappe à ceux qu’elles concernent. La transparence devient une opacité d’un autre type : non plus celle de l’absence d’information, mais celle de son excès non disputable. L’économie parle partout, mais souvent dans une langue qui préclasse avant même que l’on puisse répondre. +C'est ici que la tension entre symbolisation et saturation prend toute +sa portée. Une économie qui symbolise permet de rendre visibles les +contributions, de les inscrire dans des récits, de les relier à des +formes de reconnaissance. Une économie saturée, au contraire, produit +une accumulation de données qui ne se laisse pas interpréter comme un +ensemble cohérent. Elle donne l'illusion d'une transparence totale — tout est mesuré, tout est enregistré, tout semble objectivé — alors +même que le sens de ces mesures échappe à ceux qu'elles concernent. La +transparence devient une opacité d'un autre type : non plus celle de +l'absence d'information, mais celle de son excès non disputable. +L'économie parle partout, mais souvent dans une langue qui préclasse +avant même que l'on puisse répondre. -Dans ce régime, la scène économique tend à se dissoudre dans des dispositifs qui produisent des effets sans se donner comme décisions. Elles sont prises, mais elles n’apparaissent pas comme telles. Elles sont intégrées dans des processus automatisés, des architectures techniques, des chaînes de traitement qui les rendent difficiles à localiser. La question « qui décide ? » devient presque inopérante, non parce qu’il n’y aurait plus de décision, mais parce que celle-ci est distribuée, fragmentée, incorporée dans des systèmes qui en masquent la source. C’est ici que le refus de crédit automatisé, qui ouvrait cette section, retrouve toute sa portée : ce refus n’est pas un cas parmi d’autres ; il est l’image condensée d’une économie où le pouvoir d’allouer, de soutenir ou d’exclure s’exerce en amont de la scène, sans avoir à comparaître comme pouvoir. Ce qui y apparaît à l’état microscopique — l’exclusion sans face, le jugement sans débat, la décision sans scène — vaut comme schème de nombreuses régulations économiques contemporaines. +Dans ce régime, la scène économique tend à se dissoudre dans des +dispositifs qui produisent des effets sans se donner comme décisions. +Elles sont prises, mais elles n'apparaissent pas comme telles. Elles +sont intégrées dans des processus automatisés, des architectures +techniques, des chaînes de traitement qui les rendent difficiles à +localiser. La question « qui décide ? » devient presque inopérante, non +parce qu'il n'y aurait plus de décision, mais parce que celle-ci est +distribuée, fragmentée, incorporée dans des systèmes qui en masquent la +source. C'est ici que le refus de crédit automatisé, qui ouvrait cette +section, retrouve toute sa portée : ce refus n'est pas un cas parmi +d'autres ; il est l'image condensée d'une économie où le pouvoir +d'allouer, de soutenir ou d'exclure s'exerce en amont de la scène, sans +avoir à comparaître comme pouvoir. Ce qui y apparaît à l'état +microscopique — l'exclusion sans face, le jugement sans débat, la +décision sans scène — vaut comme schème de nombreuses régulations +économiques contemporaines. -Cette disparition relative de la scène ne signifie pas l’absence de pouvoir ; elle en marque au contraire une transformation. Le pouvoir ne s’exerce plus seulement par des actes explicites, identifiables, contestables. Il s’exerce par la configuration des conditions dans lesquelles les actes peuvent ou non apparaître comme tels. Il détermine ce qui est mesurable, ce qui est comparable, ce qui est calculable, ce qui peut être traduit en critère recevable. Il agit en amont de la décision, dans la définition des paramètres qui rendront certaines décisions possibles et d’autres impensables. Là se loge peut-être l’une des violences les plus profondes de l’économie contemporaine : dans cette capacité à présélectionner le réel avant que le dissensus puisse l’atteindre. +Cette disparition relative de la scène ne signifie pas l'absence de +pouvoir ; elle en marque au contraire une transformation. Le pouvoir ne +s'exerce plus seulement par des actes explicites, identifiables, +contestables. Il s'exerce par la configuration des conditions dans +lesquelles les actes peuvent ou non apparaître comme tels. Il détermine +ce qui est mesurable, ce qui est comparable, ce qui est calculable, ce +qui peut être traduit en critère recevable. Il agit en amont de la +décision, dans la définition des paramètres qui rendront certaines +décisions possibles et d'autres impensables. Là se loge peut-être l'une +des violences les plus profondes de l'économie contemporaine : dans +cette capacité à présélectionner le réel avant que le dissensus puisse +l'atteindre. -Ce déplacement a des conséquences politiques majeures. Il transforme la nature même du dissensus. Là où, dans des configurations antérieures, les conflits pouvaient se cristalliser autour de décisions identifiables — une loi, un impôt, un salaire, un prix — ils se déplacent aujourd’hui vers des zones où la décision est diffuse, où les responsabilités sont diluées, où les effets sont ressentis sans que leurs causes soient clairement assignables. Le conflit ne disparaît pas ; il devient plus difficile à saisir, à formuler, à porter dans une scène. Il se déplace souvent vers des formes de colère dispersée, d’épuisement silencieux, de soupçon généralisé ou de dénonciation sans prise. C’est aussi pourquoi l’économie contemporaine ne produit pas seulement de l’inégalité ; elle produit de la désorientation. +Ce déplacement a des conséquences politiques majeures. Il transforme la +nature même du dissensus. Là où, dans des configurations antérieures, +les conflits pouvaient se cristalliser autour de décisions identifiables — une loi, un impôt, un salaire, un prix — ils se déplacent +aujourd'hui vers des zones où la décision est diffuse, où les +responsabilités sont diluées, où les effets sont ressentis sans que +leurs causes soient clairement assignables. Le conflit ne disparaît pas +; il devient plus difficile à saisir, à formuler, à porter dans une +scène. Il se déplace souvent vers des formes de colère dispersée, +d'épuisement silencieux, de soupçon généralisé ou de dénonciation sans +prise. C'est aussi pourquoi l'économie contemporaine ne produit pas +seulement de l'inégalité ; elle produit de la désorientation. -Dans ce contexte, certaines formes de contestation tendent à émerger sous des modalités nouvelles. Elles ne portent plus seulement sur des revendications distributives, mais sur les conditions mêmes de la visibilité et de la reconnaissance. Elles interrogent les algorithmes, contestent les indicateurs, dénoncent l’opacité des dispositifs, réclament des droits d’explication, de recours, de suspension, de révision. Elles cherchent à rouvrir des espaces où les critères de valorisation peuvent être discutés. Mais elles se heurtent à des architectures qui intègrent ces contestations comme des variables à gérer, des signaux à traiter, des perturbations à absorber. Le système résiste à la critique, mais il sait aussi, de plus en plus souvent, la préformater. +Dans ce contexte, certaines formes de contestation tendent à émerger +sous des modalités nouvelles. Elles ne portent plus seulement sur des +revendications distributives, mais sur les conditions mêmes de la +visibilité et de la reconnaissance. Elles interrogent les algorithmes, +contestent les indicateurs, dénoncent l'opacité des dispositifs, +réclament des droits d'explication, de recours, de suspension, de +révision. Elles cherchent à rouvrir des espaces où les critères de +valorisation peuvent être discutés. Mais elles se heurtent à des +architectures qui intègrent ces contestations comme des variables à +gérer, des signaux à traiter, des perturbations à absorber. Le système +résiste à la critique, mais il sait aussi, de plus en plus souvent, la +préformater. -C’est pourquoi la question de la réarchicration économique ne peut être pensée comme un simple retour à des formes antérieures de régulation. Il ne s’agit pas de restaurer des scènes telles qu’elles existaient, mais de comprendre comment, dans les configurations actuelles, des espaces de mise en tension peuvent être institués. Cela suppose de reconnaître que les dispositifs techniques, loin d’être neutres, participent pleinement de la structuration de la scène. Ils ne sont pas des outils extérieurs à la régulation ; ils en sont des opérateurs internes. Une réarchicration minimale impliquerait alors de réinscrire certaines de ces opérations techniques dans des cadres où elles peuvent être exposées et discutées. Cela pourrait passer, par exemple, par des dispositifs où les critères d’évaluation algorithmique sont rendus publics, où leurs effets peuvent être contestés, où des instances indépendantes peuvent en examiner les biais et les conséquences ; ou encore par des formes de gouvernance des données qui ne se limitent pas à leur protection, mais ouvrent des espaces de délibération sur leurs usages, leurs finalités et leurs effets de tri. +C'est pourquoi la question de la réarchicration économique ne peut être +pensée comme un simple retour à des formes antérieures de régulation. Il +ne s'agit pas de restaurer des scènes telles qu'elles existaient, mais +de comprendre comment, dans les configurations actuelles, des espaces de +mise en tension peuvent être institués. Cela suppose de reconnaître que +les dispositifs techniques, loin d'être neutres, participent pleinement +de la structuration de la scène. Ils ne sont pas des outils extérieurs à +la régulation ; ils en sont des opérateurs internes. Une réarchicration +minimale impliquerait alors de réinscrire certaines de ces opérations +techniques dans des cadres où elles peuvent être exposées et discutées. +Cela pourrait passer, par exemple, par des dispositifs où les critères +d'évaluation algorithmique sont rendus publics, où leurs effets peuvent +être contestés, où des instances indépendantes peuvent en examiner les +biais et les conséquences ; ou encore par des formes de gouvernance des +données qui ne se limitent pas à leur protection, mais ouvrent des +espaces de délibération sur leurs usages, leurs finalités et leurs +effets de tri. -Mais ces pistes, pour nécessaires qu’elles soient, ne suffisent pas à elles seules. Car la question de la scène économique ne se réduit pas à celle des dispositifs techniques. Elle engage également les formes d’organisation collective, les institutions, les cadres juridiques, les milieux de vie. Elle suppose de repenser les conditions dans lesquelles des acteurs peuvent apparaître, se faire entendre, peser sur les décisions. Elle implique de reconnaître que la régulation ne peut être déléguée à des mécanismes automatiques sans perdre sa dimension politique. Une scène économique archicratiquement consistante n’exige pas l’abolition du calcul ; elle exige que le calcul cesse d’être le lieu exclusif et silencieux du jugement. +Mais ces pistes, pour nécessaires qu'elles soient, ne suffisent pas à +elles seules. Car la question de la scène économique ne se réduit pas à +celle des dispositifs techniques. Elle engage également les formes +d'organisation collective, les institutions, les cadres juridiques, les +milieux de vie. Elle suppose de repenser les conditions dans lesquelles +des acteurs peuvent apparaître, se faire entendre, peser sur les +décisions. Elle implique de reconnaître que la régulation ne peut être +déléguée à des mécanismes automatiques sans perdre sa dimension +politique. Une scène économique archicratiquement consistante n'exige +pas l'abolition du calcul ; elle exige que le calcul cesse d'être le +lieu exclusif et silencieux du jugement. -Ce point est décisif. Il signifie que l’économie ne peut être laissée à elle-même, comme si elle relevait d’un ordre distinct du politique. Elle doit être comprise comme un espace où se joue, de manière particulièrement intense, la question de la co-viabilité : comment des formes de vie différentes, parfois incompatibles, peuvent-elles coexister sans que certaines soient systématiquement sacrifiées ? Cette question ne trouve pas de réponse dans l’optimisation des flux ou dans l’ajustement des incitations. Elle exige surtout que l’économie redevienne un espace de comparution, et non un régime d’exécution. +Ce point est décisif. Il signifie que l'économie ne peut être laissée à +elle-même, comme si elle relevait d'un ordre distinct du politique. Elle +doit être comprise comme un espace où se joue, de manière +particulièrement intense, la question de la co-viabilité : comment des +formes de vie différentes, parfois incompatibles, peuvent-elles +coexister sans que certaines soient systématiquement sacrifiées ? Cette +question ne trouve pas de réponse dans l'optimisation des flux ou dans +l'ajustement des incitations. Elle exige surtout que l'économie +redevienne un espace de comparution, et non un régime d'exécution. -Or ces scènes sont aujourd’hui à la fois présentes et fragilisées. Elles existent dans certains espaces — institutions publiques, organisations collectives, initiatives locales, expériences coopératives — mais elles sont concurrencées par des dispositifs qui les contournent, les captent ou les rendent inopérantes. Elles sont prises dans une tension entre leur nécessité et leur érosion. Elles doivent être constamment réinstituées, réactivées, défendues. Une économie viable n’est pas une économie sans conflit ; c’est une économie qui accepte encore de faire scène de ce qui la déchire. +Or ces scènes sont aujourd'hui à la fois présentes et fragilisées. Elles +existent dans certains espaces — institutions publiques, organisations +collectives, initiatives locales, expériences coopératives — mais +elles sont concurrencées par des dispositifs qui les contournent, les +captent ou les rendent inopérantes. Elles sont prises dans une tension +entre leur nécessité et leur érosion. Elles doivent être constamment +réinstituées, réactivées, défendues. Une économie viable n'est pas une +économie sans conflit ; c'est une économie qui accepte encore de faire +scène de ce qui la déchire. -C’est ici que l’économie révèle sa dimension profondément écologique, au sens le plus large du terme. En déterminant la valeur, elle façonne aussi les milieux dans lesquels les existences se déploient. Elle détermine les usages du vivant, les ressources mobilisées, les équilibres maintenus ou rompus, ainsi que les territoires soutenus ou exposés à l’usure extractive. En somme, elle intervient dans la définition même des conditions d’habitabilité du monde. La tension entre subsistance et captation se prolonge ainsi dans une tension entre préservation des milieux et exploitation des ressources, entre continuité du vivant et extraction destructrice. +C'est ici que l'économie révèle sa dimension profondément écologique, au +sens le plus large du terme. En déterminant la valeur, elle façonne +aussi les milieux dans lesquels les existences se déploient. Elle +détermine les usages du vivant, les ressources mobilisées, les +équilibres maintenus ou rompus, ainsi que les territoires soutenus ou +exposés à l'usure extractive. En somme, elle intervient dans la +définition même des conditions d'habitabilité du monde. La tension entre +subsistance et captation se prolonge ainsi dans une tension entre +préservation des milieux et exploitation des ressources, entre +continuité du vivant et extraction destructrice. -Cette continuité n’est pas simplement thématique ; elle est structurelle. Elle indique que l’économie ne peut être comprise sans être articulée à une réflexion sur les conditions matérielles de la vie. Elle montre que les choix économiques ne sont jamais neutres du point de vue écologique, qu’ils engagent toujours des transformations des milieux, des déplacements de la vie, des reconfigurations des équilibres. Elle rend visible le fait que la co-viabilité économique et la co-viabilité écologique sont indissociables. L’économie ne règle pas seulement la circulation de la valeur ; elle décide aussi, souvent sans le dire, de ce qui pourra encore être habité. +Cette continuité n'est pas simplement thématique ; elle est +structurelle. Elle indique que l'économie ne peut être comprise sans +être articulée à une réflexion sur les conditions matérielles de la vie. +Elle montre que les choix économiques ne sont jamais neutres du point de +vue écologique, qu'ils engagent toujours des transformations des +milieux, des déplacements de la vie, des reconfigurations des +équilibres. Elle rend visible le fait que la co-viabilité économique et +la co-viabilité écologique sont indissociables. L'économie ne règle pas +seulement la circulation de la valeur ; elle décide aussi, souvent sans +le dire, de ce qui pourra encore être habité. -C’est pourquoi l’analyse de la scène économique appelle nécessairement son prolongement dans une analyse de la scène écologique. Non pas comme un ajout, mais comme une conséquence interne. Ce qui se joue dans l’économie — la configuration des critères de valeur, la captation des ressources, l’invisibilisation de certaines contributions, la compression des temporalités, la désactivation de la scène — se prolonge dans la manière dont les milieux sont transformés, exploités, préservés ou détruits. L’économie apparaît alors comme l’un des vecteurs principaux de la transformation des conditions d’habitabilité. +C'est pourquoi l'analyse de la scène économique appelle nécessairement +son prolongement dans une analyse de la scène écologique. Non pas comme +un ajout, mais comme une conséquence interne. Ce qui se joue dans +l'économie — la configuration des critères de valeur, la captation des +ressources, l'invisibilisation de certaines contributions, la +compression des temporalités, la désactivation de la scène — se +prolonge dans la manière dont les milieux sont transformés, exploités, +préservés ou détruits. L'économie apparaît alors comme l'un des vecteurs +principaux de la transformation des conditions d'habitabilité. -Ainsi, la section économique ne peut se clore sur elle-même. Elle doit ouvrir vers la question écologique, non comme un domaine distinct, mais comme l’extension matérielle de la même problématique. La tension entre subsistance et captation, entre travail vivant et abstraction, entre symbolisation et saturation, entre différé et instantanéité, trouve dans l’écologie un prolongement où ses effets cessent d’être seulement distributifs pour devenir territoriaux, vitaux, parfois irréversibles. +Ainsi, la section économique ne peut se clore sur elle-même. Elle doit +ouvrir vers la question écologique, non comme un domaine distinct, mais +comme l'extension matérielle de la même problématique. La tension entre +subsistance et captation, entre travail vivant et abstraction, entre +symbolisation et saturation, entre différé et instantanéité, trouve dans +l'écologie un prolongement où ses effets cessent d'être seulement +distributifs pour devenir territoriaux, vitaux, parfois irréversibles. -Là où l’économie décide déjà de ce qui compte, l’écologie montrera qu’elle décide aussi — souvent à bas bruit — de ce qui pourra encore tenir, respirer, se reproduire et demeurer habitable. C’est vers ce seuil que l’analyse doit désormais se déplacer. +Là où l'économie décide déjà de ce qui compte, l'écologie montrera +qu'elle décide aussi — souvent à bas bruit — de ce qui pourra encore +tenir, respirer, se reproduire et demeurer habitable. C'est vers ce +seuil que l'analyse doit désormais se déplacer. ## **5.2 — Tensions écologiques : territorialité, vivant, inhabitation** -Les basculements écologiques ne prennent pas toujours la forme d’une rupture spectaculaire. Il arrive qu’un milieu se transforme à bas bruit, dans une continuité administrative, technique et procédurale qui fait passer la décision pour une formalité. Une autorisation est délivrée. Un projet est validé. Des travaux commencent. Tout semble conforme : les études d’impact ont été réalisées, les consultations ont eu lieu, les avis ont été rendus. Et pourtant, quelque chose a déjà été perdu avant même que la première machine n’entre en action. - -La perte ne se laisse pas immédiatement décrire en termes de destruction matérielle. Avant l’anéantissement d’un écosystème ou l’inhabitabilité déclarée d’un territoire, quelque chose de plus discret se défait déjà : la possibilité, pour les formes de vie concernées — humaines et non humaines —, de comparaître dans une scène où les conditions de leur maintien puissent peser effectivement sur la décision. Les cadres dans lesquels la décision est instruite traduisent les milieux en variables, les usages en indicateurs, les attachements en impacts mesurables. Ce qui excède ces formats — la continuité d’un paysage, la mémoire d’un lieu, l’épaisseur des relations entre vivants — est soit converti, soit laissé à la marge. La scène existe encore, mais elle est déjà configurée de telle sorte que certaines dimensions essentielles ne puissent y apparaître qu’à titre résiduel. - -La décision ne vient pas clore un processus ; elle a déjà été rendue probable en amont de toute véritable comparution. Elle est préparée, cadrée, rendue probable par les catégories mêmes qui organisent son instruction. Le débat a lieu, mais il a lieu dans un espace où ce qui pourrait faire rupture est déjà neutralisé. Ce qui se joue ici ne relève donc pas d’un simple arbitrage entre intérêts divergents. Il engage la transformation des conditions dans lesquelles un monde peut encore être maintenu comme habitable. - -Le conflit de Notre-Dame-des-Landes a rendu cette logique perceptible sous une forme politiquement explosive : il ne portait pas sur un projet isolé, mais sur le refus de voir des formes d’habitation, des usages et des continuités écologiques reconduits au rang de variables dans une décision déjà cadrée. - -À partir de ce point, l’écologie cesse de pouvoir être pensée comme un domaine distinct, circonscrit à la gestion de la nature ou des ressources. Elle apparaît comme le lieu où les tensions qui traversent l’ensemble des configurations contemporaines prennent une forme matérielle, tangible, souvent irréversible. Ce qui, dans le champ économique, peut encore se présenter sous la forme d’une distribution inégale de la valeur, devient ici une question de maintien ou de disparition des conditions mêmes de l’existence. Là où l’économie trie les contributions et hiérarchise les formes de participation, l’écologie engage la condition de possibilité pour certaines formes de vie de persister. - -L’écologie n’apparaît pas ici comme un thème supplémentaire ; elle concentre au contraire, sous une forme concrète, les tensions les plus décisives du contemporain. La tension entre subsistance et captation, déjà à l’œuvre dans la sphère économique, s’y manifeste sous la forme d’une tension entre continuité du vivant et extraction de ses conditions de reproduction. Les milieux ne sont plus simplement mobilisés : leur capacité même à soutenir la vie se trouve transformée. Les sols s’appauvrissent, les cycles de l’eau se dérèglent, les habitats se fragmentent, les équilibres biologiques se délitent. Ce qui est en jeu n’est plus seulement la distribution des ressources, mais la possibilité de leur renouvellement. - -Cette première tension, entre subsistance du vivant et captation de ses conditions, ne peut être comprise comme une dérive accidentelle. Elle constitue l’un des axes structurants des régimes contemporains. Toute configuration sociale prélève, transforme, utilise. Mais dans les formes actuelles, cette mobilisation tend à excéder les capacités de régénération des milieux. Ce qui permet la vie devient ce qui la fragilise. Les ressources sont extraites à un rythme qui ne correspond plus aux temporalités de leur renouvellement. Les milieux sont sollicités au-delà de leurs capacités d’absorption. L’écologie révèle ainsi une dissymétrie fondamentale entre les temps de l’exploitation et les temps de la reproduction. - -À cette tension s’en noue une seconde, tout aussi décisive, entre les formes de vie et les cadres d’habitabilité. Car un territoire ne se réduit pas à ses caractéristiques physiques ; il est le support de pratiques, de relations, de transmissions qui lui donnent sens. Lorsqu’une eau est polluée, ce ne sont pas de seuls paramètres chimiques qui se dégradent, mais des usages, des économies locales, des habitudes alimentaires, des formes de sociabilité. De même, l’artificialisation des sols altère bien davantage qu’un paysage : elle transforme les manières d’habiter, de se déplacer, de travailler. - -L’habitabilité ne disparaît donc pas d’un coup. Elle se défait par décalages successifs, par altérations progressives, par micro-irréversibilités qui, accumulées, rendent un milieu de plus en plus difficile à vivre. Le territoire subsiste, mais il cesse d’être pleinement habitable pour ceux qui y étaient inscrits. Les formes de vie persistent, mais elles doivent se transformer, se déplacer, se recomposer. L’écologie introduit ainsi une dimension de désajustement entre les cadres matériels et les existences qui s’y déploient. - -La scène se complique encore avec une troisième tension : celle qui oppose la territorialité située à l’abstraction logistique. Les milieux, pour être intégrés dans les dispositifs contemporains de décision, doivent être traduits dans des formats compatibles avec des calculs d’ensemble. Ils deviennent des ensembles de données, des unités de mesure, des variables intégrables dans des modèles. Cette traduction n’est pas en elle-même illégitime ; elle permet de rendre comparables des situations, de prendre en compte des interactions complexes, d’élaborer des politiques à grande échelle. Mais elle opère aussi une transformation du rapport aux territoires. - -Car ce qui est traduit perd une partie de sa singularité. Un écosystème devient un ensemble de fonctions. Un paysage devient une surface. Un usage devient une donnée. Cette abstraction permet de déplacer les décisions hors du cadre local, de les inscrire dans des logiques globales, de les intégrer dans des chaînes d’optimisation. Mais elle tend aussi à déposséder les acteurs situés de la capacité à faire valoir ce qui, dans leur rapport au territoire, excède ces formats. La scène locale se trouve ainsi reconfigurée par des dispositifs qui opèrent à une autre échelle. - -Une quatrième tension traverse enfin l’ensemble de ces configurations : celle qui oppose le différé nécessaire à la régulation à l’irréversibilité des transformations. Toute scène de décision suppose un temps : un temps pour que les positions se formulent, pour que les arguments se confrontent, pour que les choix puissent être discutés. Or les transformations écologiques engagent souvent des processus qui, une fois enclenchés, ne peuvent être aisément inversés. Détruire une zone humide, fragmenter un habitat, polluer durablement une ressource, ce n’est pas seulement produire un effet immédiat ; c’est engager le milieu dans une trajectoire dont il sera difficile de revenir. - -La dissymétrie entre le temps de la décision et le temps du monde matériel forme l’un des nœuds les plus aigus de l’écologie contemporaine. Elle rend la scène de régulation intrinsèquement fragile. Car une décision peut être discutée, contestée, révisée en droit, tout en produisant des effets irréversibles en fait. La possibilité de la révision ne garantit pas la possibilité du retour. L’écologie oblige à penser ensemble des temporalités hétérogènes, dont l’articulation est loin d’aller de soi. - -C’est dans ce contexte que s’est progressivement constituée une arcalité écologique dominante. Elle se présente comme une tentative de prise en charge de ces tensions, sous les formes désormais bien connues du développement durable, de la transition écologique, de la gestion raisonnée des ressources. Elle reconnaît l’existence de limites, affirme la nécessité de préserver les milieux et s’équipe d’instruments de mesure, de cadres normatifs, d’objectifs. Elle donne ainsi aux enjeux écologiques une forme institutionnelle. - -Ce faisant, elle transforme aussi le statut des tensions. Celles-ci sont reformulées comme des problèmes de gestion, traitables par ajustements techniques, innovations ou optimisations. Les incompatibilités structurelles sont traduites en déséquilibres à corriger, en impacts à réduire, en externalités à intégrer. La conflictualité n’est pas niée, mais elle est reconfigurée de manière à devenir compatible avec les cadres existants. - -Ce déplacement se manifeste notamment dans la place accordée aux instruments de mesure. Bilans carbone, indicateurs de biodiversité, scénarios de transition : ces outils permettent de rendre visibles des phénomènes complexes, mais ils orientent aussi la manière dont ces phénomènes sont appréhendés. En traduisant les milieux en séries de données, ils tendent à privilégier ce qui est mesurable au détriment de ce qui ne l’est pas. Ils déplacent alors l’attention vers l’optimisation des indicateurs, au détriment de la transformation effective des conditions d’habitabilité. - -La scène écologique se documente de plus en plus, mais s’ouvre de moins en moins à une conflictualité explicite. Les décisions apparaissent comme les conséquences nécessaires des données disponibles, plutôt que comme des choix susceptibles d’être contestés. La régulation tend à se présenter comme un prolongement du calcul. - -C’est depuis cette arcalité que se déploient les transformations effectives des milieux — autrement dit, les cratialités écologiques. L’analyse doit désormais entrer dans l’épaisseur des opérations, là où ces tensions se traduisent en dispositifs matériels et en épreuves d’habitabilité. Car les cratialités écologiques ne se laissent pas saisir à partir des seuls cadres qui les décrivent. Elles s’éprouvent dans des gestes, dans des chaînes de transformation, dans des dispositifs qui affectent directement les milieux. Là où l’arcalité organise des formes de lisibilité et de gouvernement, les cratialités engagent des processus matériels : elles extraient, déplacent, transforment, reconfigurent. Elles ne disent pas seulement le monde ; elles le refont. - -Dans de nombreuses régions d’Afrique centrale, l’exploitation industrielle du cobalt — ressource devenue stratégique pour les technologies contemporaines — s’opère dans des conditions qui illustrent de manière particulièrement nette cette dimension. En République démocratique du Congo, où se concentre une part majeure des réserves mondiales, les sites d’extraction combinent exploitation industrielle et activités artisanales. Les paysages y sont profondément transformés : sols retournés sur des profondeurs irréversibles, nappes contaminées, habitats déplacés, continuités écologiques fragmentées. Les chaînes de production qui relient ces sites aux industries globales sont longues, complexes, souvent opaques. Les dispositifs juridiques existent, les normes sont définies, les engagements sont affichés. Mais sur le terrain, les conditions de travail, les impacts environnementaux et les transformations sociales témoignent d’une réalité où la scène de régulation peine à se constituer. - -Ce qui se donne à voir ici n’est pas l’absence pure de cadre, mais une situation où la transformation des milieux et des existences déborde largement les dispositifs censés l’encadrer. Les populations locales sont affectées dans leurs conditions de vie — accès à l’eau, qualité des sols, santé — sans disposer toujours des moyens effectifs de faire valoir leurs positions dans des instances capables d’infléchir les décisions. Les flux économiques qui structurent ces activités sont transnationaux, tandis que les scènes de contestation restent largement localisées. Ces dispositifs ne sont pas neutres : ils organisent la protection d’intérêts situés, capables de déplacer les contraintes sans en subir les effets. - -La tension entre territorialité et abstraction logistique prend ici une forme particulièrement aiguë : ce qui est extrait localement s’inscrit dans des chaînes globales où les lieux d’impact et les lieux de décision sont dissociés. Ce qui se joue ici tient à cette dissociation radicale entre les lieux où les décisions sont prises et ceux où leurs effets deviennent irréversibles. - -Dans une configuration de ce type, la scène écologique ne disparaît pas entièrement, mais elle est profondément déséquilibrée. Elle existe à travers des normes, des audits, des engagements, mais elle est largement débordée par la puissance des chaînes d’extraction. On peut parler ici d’une forme de captation extensive, où la transformation matérielle des milieux s’impose dans des conditions qui limitent fortement la capacité des acteurs concernés à en faire un objet de régulation effective. La conflictualité est présente — parfois violente — mais elle ne trouve pas toujours les formes de comparution qui permettraient de la transformer en processus de régulation. - -Dans d’autres configurations, ce n’est pas tant l’intensité de l’extraction qui frappe que la manière dont les transformations sont reconfigurées dans des dispositifs qui en modifient le sens. Les politiques de compensation écologique en offrent une illustration complémentaire. - -Lors de la construction de certaines infrastructures de transport en Europe — lignes ferroviaires à grande vitesse, autoroutes, zones d’aménagement — des surfaces importantes de milieux naturels sont détruites ou fragmentées. En contrepartie, des programmes de restauration sont mis en place ailleurs : reconstitution de zones humides, création de corridors écologiques, financement d’actions de conservation. Ces dispositifs mobilisent des expertises, des financements, des suivis sur le long terme. Ils ne sont pas fictifs ; ils produisent des effets réels. - -Mais ils opèrent aussi un déplacement décisif. La destruction n’est plus niée : elle est rendue acceptable à condition d’être convertible. Ce qui disparaît n’est pas seulement compensé ailleurs : c’est la singularité même des milieux qui est rendue échangeable. Ce qui était initialement un conflit situé — la transformation d’un milieu donné — devient un problème de gestion d’équivalences. La question n’est plus : « ce territoire peut-il supporter cette transformation ? », mais : « les fonctions écologiques détruites ici peuvent-elles être reconstituées ailleurs ? ». Le cadre de décision se déplace ainsi d’une scène locale à une logique de compensation globale. - -Sous le nom de compensation se joue en réalité une opération de traduction : des milieux hétérogènes sont rendus commensurables, des temporalités disjointes sont alignées, des pertes localisées sont intégrées dans une comptabilité globale qui ne connaît plus que des équivalences. - -On observe ici un régime de simulation régulatrice. La scène écologique continue d’exister sous la forme de procédures, de suivis et d’évaluations. La conflictualité initiale, elle, se trouve transformée : intégrée dans un système d’équivalences qui permet de maintenir la continuité des projets tout en affichant une prise en compte des impacts. La régulation demeure active, mais au prix d’une modification de la nature même de ce qui est régulé. - -Ce déplacement ne doit pas être interprété de manière univoque. Il permet parfois d’éviter des destructions plus importantes, de mobiliser des ressources pour la restauration, de rendre visibles des enjeux. Mais il introduit aussi une logique dans laquelle les singularités des milieux peuvent être partiellement neutralisées au profit d’une intelligibilité globale. La scène locale perd en centralité ce que gagne la cohérence d’ensemble du dispositif. - -Une troisième forme de cratialité écologique se manifeste là où les transformations des milieux sont étroitement liées à des dispositifs d’infrastructure et de planification à grande échelle. Les barrages hydroélectriques en constituent un exemple particulièrement éclairant. - -Dans des pays comme le Brésil ou l’Inde, la construction de grands barrages a profondément reconfiguré les territoires. Ces infrastructures permettent la production d’énergie, la régulation des flux hydriques, le développement économique. Mais elles entraînent également des transformations majeures : déplacement de populations, submersion de territoires habités, modification des écosystèmes aquatiques, altération durable des cycles sédimentaires. - -Les projets sont généralement encadrés par des dispositifs institutionnels : études d’impact, consultations, négociations. Mais la décision de construire un barrage s’inscrit souvent dans des logiques de planification qui dépassent les cadres locaux. Les enjeux énergétiques, économiques, géopolitiques sont mobilisés pour justifier ces projets. Les populations affectées peuvent être consultées, indemnisées, relocalisées, mais leur capacité à infléchir la décision reste limitée. - -On se trouve ici dans une configuration où la scène est déplacée et stratifiée. Elle existe à plusieurs niveaux — local, national, international — mais ces niveaux ne sont pas symétriques. Les décisions structurantes sont prises à des échelles où les acteurs locaux ont peu de prise. La tension entre souverainetés territoriales et interdépendances globales se manifeste de manière particulièrement nette. Les infrastructures apparaissent comme nécessaires à des objectifs collectifs, mais leurs effets sont localisés et souvent irréversibles. - -La cratialité écologique prend ici la forme d’une reconfiguration systémique des milieux. Elle ne se limite pas à une extraction ponctuelle ; elle redessine les équilibres d’un territoire dans son ensemble. Elle produit des effets durables, qui engagent les conditions d’habitabilité sur le long terme. Et elle le fait dans des cadres où la mise en scène des tensions reste partielle. - -Une quatrième configuration apparaît là où les milieux sont gouvernés à travers des dispositifs de données, de modélisation et de surveillance. Les technologies contemporaines permettent de suivre en temps réel des paramètres environnementaux, de modéliser des dynamiques complexes, d’anticiper des évolutions. Ces outils sont mobilisés dans la gestion des forêts, des ressources hydriques, des zones côtières, des climats urbains. - -Dans les politiques de lutte contre le changement climatique, par exemple, les décisions reposent largement sur des scénarios élaborés par des institutions comme le Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'évolution du climat. Ces scénarios intègrent des données multiples, des hypothèses, des projections. Ils constituent des outils indispensables pour orienter les politiques publiques. - -Mais ils contribuent aussi à installer la scène écologique dans un régime de saturation experte. Les débats se structurent autour de l’interprétation de modèles, de la validité des hypothèses, de la pertinence des scénarios. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas, mais elle se déplace vers des espaces où la maîtrise technique devient une condition d’entrée dans la discussion. Les acteurs qui ne disposent pas de ces compétences se trouvent en position de dépendance. - -La scène écologique devient ainsi à la fois plus informée et plus difficilement appropriable. Elle est saturée de données, mais cette saturation peut produire une forme d’opacité. Les décisions apparaissent comme les conséquences nécessaires de calculs complexes, plutôt que comme des choix susceptibles d’être contestés. La régulation tend à se présenter comme un prolongement du calcul, plutôt que comme une mise en tension explicite. Ce qui se perd alors n’est pas l’information, mais la possibilité pratique d’en discuter les effets obligés. - -Face à ces formes de captation, de simulation, de déplacement et de saturation, il serait pourtant erroné de conclure à une disparition totale des possibilités de réouverture de la scène. Des configurations existent où des formes d’archicration écologique émergent, encore incomplètes mais bien réelles. - -Dans certaines régions d’Italie, des mobilisations contre la privatisation de l’eau ont conduit à la mise en place de dispositifs de gestion publique intégrant des formes de participation citoyenne. À Naples, la transformation de l’entreprise de gestion de l’eau en une structure à gouvernance élargie a ouvert des espaces où les décisions peuvent être discutées, où les critères peuvent être rendus visibles, où les acteurs peuvent apparaître. - -De même, dans plusieurs pays d’Amérique latine, des communautés locales ont obtenu la reconnaissance de droits sur leurs territoires, leur permettant de s’opposer à certains projets extractifs. Ces processus sont souvent conflictuels, incertains, exposés à des retournements. Mais ils témoignent de la possibilité d’une réouverture de la scène, où les tensions peuvent être mises en comparution de manière plus explicite. - -Ces scènes restent fragiles. Elles ne suppriment pas les tensions, elles ne garantissent pas leur résolution. Mais elles permettent de les rendre visibles, discutables, transformables. Elles montrent que la désarchicration écologique n’est pas une fatalité, mais un régime qui peut être contesté, déplacé, partiellement réouvert. - -Ce parcours à travers différentes configurations permet de saisir plus précisément la nature des cratialités écologiques contemporaines. Elles ne relèvent pas d’une logique unique, mais d’un ensemble de régimes qui combinent extraction, compensation, infrastructure, expertise, participation. Elles produisent des effets matériels qui redéfinissent les conditions d’habitabilité, tout en s’inscrivant dans des dispositifs qui modifient la manière dont ces effets peuvent être mis en scène. - -Mais dans toutes ces configurations, une constante apparaît : la difficulté à instituer des espaces où les tensions écologiques puissent être pleinement exposées comme telles. Les milieux sont transformés, les impacts sont mesurés, les décisions sont prises. Mais la comparution des tensions — c’est-à-dire leur mise en débat explicite, contradictoire, révisable — reste souvent partielle. - -C’est pourquoi la question écologique ne peut être réduite à une gestion des ressources ou à une optimisation des impacts. Elle engage une interrogation plus fondamentale sur les conditions dans lesquelles un monde peut être maintenu comme habitable. Elle oblige à penser la régulation non comme une harmonisation, mais comme une mise en tension explicite de ce qui ne se laisse pas facilement concilier. - -C’est à ce niveau que l’analyse doit maintenant se porter : celui de l’archicration écologique proprement dite, c’est-à-dire des conditions sous lesquelles les transformations des milieux peuvent être rendues disputables, exposées, révisables. - -C’est à ce point que la question change de régime. Tant que l’on demeure au niveau de l’arcalité et des cratialités, l’analyse peut encore se contenter de décrire des cadres, des opérations, des transformations. Mais dès lors qu’il s’agit de savoir si les tensions écologiques peuvent être effectivement régulées, une autre exigence s’impose : celle de la scène. Non plus la scène comme métaphore, mais la scène comme condition concrète de comparution, de confrontation, de révision. - -Car les tensions écologiques ne manquent ni de visibilité ni de gravité. Elles sont documentées, quantifiées, médiatisées. Elles donnent lieu à des alertes, à des rapports, à des mobilisations. Mais cette visibilité n’équivaut pas à une mise en scène effective. Elle peut même, dans certains cas, en tenir lieu, comme si la connaissance des tensions suffisait à leur régulation. Or, ce qui manque le plus souvent, ce ne sont pas des données supplémentaires, mais des dispositifs où ces tensions puissent être exposées comme telles, c’est-à-dire comme irréductibles, disputables, engageant des arbitrages non prédéterminés. - -L’archicration écologique commence précisément là : non pas dans la reconnaissance abstraite des enjeux, mais dans l’institution de scènes où les transformations des milieux peuvent être soumises à une comparution effective. Cela suppose une rupture avec l’idée selon laquelle la régulation écologique pourrait être entièrement déléguée à des instruments techniques, à des modèles, à des indicateurs. Non pas parce que ces instruments seraient inutiles, mais parce qu’ils ne peuvent, à eux seuls, produire la forme de conflictualité explicite qui conditionne toute régulation véritable. - -On peut, pour éclairer cette exigence, revenir sur certaines configurations où des formes d’archicration ont été tentées, avec des degrés variables de réussite. - -Dans le cas de la Convention citoyenne pour le climat, par exemple, un dispositif inédit a été mis en place en France afin de faire délibérer des citoyens tirés au sort sur les mesures à prendre pour réduire les émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Ce dispositif a combiné plusieurs éléments essentiels : accès à l’expertise, temps de délibération, production collective de propositions, publicité des travaux. - -L’enjeu ne réside pas uniquement dans le contenu des propositions, mais dans la forme même du dispositif. Pendant un temps limité, une scène a été instituée où des tensions écologiques — entre modes de vie, contraintes économiques, exigences climatiques — ont pu être exposées et discutées. Les participants ont pu confronter des arguments, interroger des experts, élaborer des compromis. - -Mais cette scène, pour réelle qu’elle ait été, n’a pas pleinement accompli les conditions d’une archicration effective. Sa traduction dans les décisions politiques a été partielle, sélective, parfois déformée. La capacité du dispositif à infléchir durablement les orientations est restée limitée. On se trouve ici dans une configuration d’archicration émergente mais incomplète : la scène existe, mais sa prise sur le réel reste fragile. - -Une première condition s’impose ici : une scène ne devient archicratique qu’à la condition de disposer d’une capacité effective de transformation. Sans cette capacité, elle demeure un espace de discussion, voire de légitimation, mais non un lieu de régulation au sens plein. - -Une deuxième condition apparaît à travers les conflits territoriaux liés à des projets d’aménagement ou d’exploitation. Dans le cas de l’abandon du projet d'aéroport de Notre-Dame-des-Landes, ce n’est pas la simple existence de procédures formelles qui a permis la réouverture de la scène, mais une combinaison de mobilisations, de contestations, de reconfigurations politiques. - -Pendant des années, le projet a été encadré par des dispositifs institutionnels : enquêtes publiques, débats, expertises. Mais ces dispositifs n’ont pas suffi à produire une véritable mise en tension des choix. La décision semblait, pour une large part, stabilisée en amont. Ce n’est que par l’intensification du conflit — occupations, mobilisations, affrontements — que la scène a été partiellement réouverte, au point de rendre la poursuite du projet politiquement coûteuse. - -Ce cas montre que l’archicration écologique ne peut être réduite à des procédures formelles. Elle suppose une capacité de mise en tension effective, qui peut passer par des formes conflictuelles, parfois extra-institutionnelles. La scène n’est pas donnée ; elle est instituée, et cette institution peut impliquer des rapports de force. Elle ne s’ouvre pas spontanément : elle s’arrache. - -Une troisième condition se laisse entrevoir dans les dispositifs de gestion collective des ressources, où des communautés locales parviennent à organiser des formes de régulation situées. Dans certaines régions d’Amérique latine, par exemple, des communautés ont obtenu la reconnaissance de droits territoriaux leur permettant de participer directement aux décisions concernant l’usage des ressources naturelles. - -Ces dispositifs ne sont pas exempts de tensions internes, ni de contraintes externes. Ils peuvent être fragilisés par des pressions économiques, des changements politiques, des divisions internes. Mais ils montrent qu’il est possible d’instituer des scènes où les acteurs directement concernés peuvent apparaître, faire valoir leurs positions, confronter leurs intérêts. - -On peut parler ici d’archicration située, où la régulation s’opère à une échelle où les effets des décisions sont directement perceptibles. Cette proximité ne garantit pas la résolution des tensions, mais elle permet leur exposition dans des conditions où elles peuvent être travaillées. - -Ces différentes configurations permettent de dégager, non pas un modèle unique d’archicration écologique, mais un ensemble de conditions minimales sans lesquelles aucune régulation effective ne peut avoir lieu. - -La première de ces conditions est la visibilité des opérations. Il ne suffit pas que les impacts soient mesurés ; il faut que les chaînes de décision soient rendues lisibles. Qui décide ? Sur quelles bases ? Selon quels critères ? Avec quelles alternatives écartées ? Tant que ces questions restent opaques, la scène ne peut se constituer. - -La deuxième condition est la comparution des acteurs. Les populations affectées, les collectifs concernés, les institutions impliquées doivent pouvoir apparaître dans la scène, non comme des variables à intégrer dans un calcul, mais comme des parties capables de soutenir des positions, de formuler des objections, de proposer des alternatives. - -Vient ensuite l’exigence de réversibilité des décisions. Une scène où les décisions sont irrévocables ne peut être archicratique. Il doit exister des possibilités de révision, d’ajustement, de transformation. Cette réversibilité est particulièrement difficile à instituer dans le domaine écologique, en raison de l’irréversibilité matérielle de certaines transformations. Mais c’est précisément ce qui rend la condition d’autant plus exigeante. - -La quatrième condition est l’adéquation des échelles. Les tensions écologiques se déploient à des échelles multiples : locales, nationales, globales. Une archicration effective doit articuler ces niveaux, éviter que des décisions globales s’imposent sans médiation aux contextes locaux, ou que des enjeux globaux soient traités uniquement à des échelles restreintes. - -Dernière exigence : reconnaître les irréductibilités elles-mêmes. Une scène écologique ne peut viser à résoudre définitivement les tensions qu’elle met en jeu. Elle doit accepter leur persistance, leur conflictualité, leur caractère parfois insoluble. L’objectif n’est pas l’harmonie, mais la co-viabilité. - -C’est ici que la notion de co-viabilité prend toute sa portée. Elle ne désigne ni un état d’équilibre stable ni la disparition des tensions, mais un régime dans lequel des formes de vie différentes peuvent coexister sans être systématiquement sacrifiées, parce que les tensions qui les opposent sont prises en charge dans des scènes précaires, révisables et exposées au conflit. Elle suppose donc des dispositifs capables de soutenir ces tensions sans les dissoudre, de rendre visibles des incompatibilités sans les nier, et de permettre des arbitrages sans les naturaliser. - -Or, ce que montrent les configurations contemporaines, c’est que ces conditions sont rarement réunies. Les tensions écologiques sont souvent connues, mais elles ne sont pas pleinement mises en scène. Elles sont gérées, compensées, optimisées, mais rarement disputées dans des cadres où leurs implications peuvent être réellement transformées. - -L’écologie apparaît ainsi aujourd’hui comme une épreuve archicratique décisive. Là où l’économie pouvait encore masquer certaines de ses tensions derrière des mécanismes d’abstraction, l’écologie les rend matérielles, sensibles, parfois irréversibles. Elle oblige à affronter la question de savoir si des scènes peuvent encore être instituées pour réguler ce qui ne peut être entièrement calculé ni entièrement compensé. - -Dans ce contexte, certaines formes de réarchicration écologique peuvent être envisagées, non comme des solutions globales, mais comme des expérimentations situées. - -Des dispositifs de délibération multi-acteurs, associant habitants, scientifiques, institutions, peuvent permettre de croiser des savoirs et des perspectives. Des formes de gouvernance territoriale élargie peuvent articuler des échelles différentes. Des mécanismes de révision périodique des décisions peuvent introduire une temporalité ouverte dans des processus autrement figés. - -Mais ces dispositifs ne valent qu’à cette condition : visibilité des opérations, comparution des acteurs, réversibilité des décisions, adéquation des échelles, reconnaissance des irréductibilités. À défaut, ils ne rouvrent pas la scène ; ils la simulent. - -Ce qui apparaît alors avec netteté, c’est que la question écologique ne peut être traitée comme un simple problème de gestion des ressources ou de réduction des impacts. Elle engage une transformation des conditions mêmes de la régulation. Elle oblige à repenser la manière dont les décisions sont prises, dont les acteurs apparaissent, dont les conflits sont traités. - -Elle révèle, en creux, les limites des régimes contemporains de désarchicration. Là où les décisions sont prises sans comparution, les effets deviennent de plus en plus difficiles à soutenir. Là où les tensions sont neutralisées plutôt que travaillées, elles réapparaissent sous des formes plus aiguës. Là où les milieux sont transformés sans scène, les conditions d’habitabilité se dégradent. - -Elle ne constitue donc pas un domaine parmi d’autres, mais un point de bascule. Elle met à l’épreuve la capacité des sociétés à instituer des scènes de régulation à la hauteur des transformations qu’elles engagent. - -Ainsi, la section écologique ne peut se clore sur une promesse d’équilibre ou de maîtrise. Elle doit se refermer sur une exigence plus radicale : celle de la comparution du vivable lui-même. - -Ce qui est désormais en jeu dépasse la distribution de la valeur comme la gestion des ressources : il s’agit de savoir si des formes de vie peuvent encore demeurer dans des milieux qui ne leur sont pas rendus impossibles. Le calcul, l’optimisation et l’accumulation de données n’y suffisent pas. Tout dépend de l’existence — ou de l’absence — de scènes où les transformations du monde deviennent visibles, contestables et révisables. Il ne s’agit donc plus seulement de limiter les dégâts, mais d’empêcher que le monde soit irréversiblement soustrait à ceux qui doivent encore y vivre. - -La traversée peut alors se poursuivre vers une autre dimension où ces tensions se redistribuent encore : celle du social. +Les basculements écologiques ne prennent pas toujours la forme d'une +rupture spectaculaire. Il arrive qu'un milieu se transforme à bas bruit, +dans une continuité administrative, technique et procédurale qui fait +passer la décision pour une formalité. Une autorisation est délivrée. Un +projet est validé. Des travaux commencent. Tout semble conforme : les +études d'impact ont été réalisées, les consultations ont eu lieu, les +avis ont été rendus. Et pourtant, quelque chose a déjà été perdu avant +même que la première machine n'entre en action. + +La perte ne se laisse pas immédiatement décrire en termes de destruction +matérielle. Avant l'anéantissement d'un écosystème ou l'inhabitabilité +déclarée d'un territoire, quelque chose de plus discret se défait déjà : +la possibilité, pour les formes de vie concernées — humaines et non +humaines —, de comparaître dans une scène où les conditions de leur +maintien puissent peser effectivement sur la décision. Les cadres dans +lesquels la décision est instruite traduisent les milieux en variables, +les usages en indicateurs, les attachements en impacts mesurables. Ce +qui excède ces formats — la continuité d'un paysage, la mémoire d'un +lieu, l'épaisseur des relations entre vivants — est soit converti, +soit laissé à la marge. La scène existe encore, mais elle est déjà +configurée de telle sorte que certaines dimensions essentielles ne +puissent y apparaître qu'à titre résiduel. + +La décision ne vient pas clore un processus ; elle a déjà été rendue +probable en amont de toute véritable comparution. Elle est préparée, +cadrée, rendue probable par les catégories mêmes qui organisent son +instruction. Le débat a lieu, mais il a lieu dans un espace où ce qui +pourrait faire rupture est déjà neutralisé. Ce qui se joue ici ne relève +donc pas d'un simple arbitrage entre intérêts divergents. Il engage la +transformation des conditions dans lesquelles un monde peut encore être +maintenu comme habitable. + +Le conflit de Notre-Dame-des-Landes a rendu cette logique perceptible +sous une forme politiquement explosive : il ne portait pas sur un projet +isolé, mais sur le refus de voir des formes d'habitation, des usages et +des continuités écologiques reconduits au rang de variables dans une +décision déjà cadrée. + +À partir de ce point, l'écologie cesse de pouvoir être pensée comme un +domaine distinct, circonscrit à la gestion de la nature ou des +ressources. Elle apparaît comme le lieu où les tensions qui traversent +l'ensemble des configurations contemporaines prennent une forme +matérielle, tangible, souvent irréversible. Ce qui, dans le champ +économique, peut encore se présenter sous la forme d'une distribution +inégale de la valeur, devient ici une question de maintien ou de +disparition des conditions mêmes de l'existence. Là où l'économie trie +les contributions et hiérarchise les formes de participation, l'écologie +engage la condition de possibilité pour certaines formes de vie de +persister. + +L'écologie n'apparaît pas ici comme un thème supplémentaire ; elle +concentre au contraire, sous une forme concrète, les tensions les plus +décisives du contemporain. La tension entre subsistance et captation, +déjà à l'œuvre dans la sphère économique, s'y manifeste sous la forme +d'une tension entre continuité du vivant et extraction de ses conditions +de reproduction. Les milieux ne sont plus simplement mobilisés : leur +capacité même à soutenir la vie se trouve transformée. Les sols +s'appauvrissent, les cycles de l'eau se dérèglent, les habitats se +fragmentent, les équilibres biologiques se délitent. Ce qui est en jeu +n'est plus seulement la distribution des ressources, mais la possibilité +de leur renouvellement. + +Cette première tension, entre subsistance du vivant et captation de ses +conditions, ne peut être comprise comme une dérive accidentelle. Elle +constitue l'un des axes structurants des régimes contemporains. Toute +configuration sociale prélève, transforme, utilise. Mais dans les formes +actuelles, cette mobilisation tend à excéder les capacités de +régénération des milieux. Ce qui permet la vie devient ce qui la +fragilise. Les ressources sont extraites à un rythme qui ne correspond +plus aux temporalités de leur renouvellement. Les milieux sont +sollicités au-delà de leurs capacités d'absorption. L'écologie révèle +ainsi une dissymétrie fondamentale entre les temps de l'exploitation et +les temps de la reproduction. + +À cette tension s'en noue une seconde, tout aussi décisive, entre les +formes de vie et les cadres d'habitabilité. Car un territoire ne se +réduit pas à ses caractéristiques physiques ; il est le support de +pratiques, de relations, de transmissions qui lui donnent sens. +Lorsqu'une eau est polluée, ce ne sont pas de seuls paramètres chimiques +qui se dégradent, mais des usages, des économies locales, des habitudes +alimentaires, des formes de sociabilité. De même, l'artificialisation +des sols altère bien davantage qu'un paysage : elle transforme les +manières d'habiter, de se déplacer, de travailler. + +L'habitabilité ne disparaît donc pas d'un coup. Elle se défait par +décalages successifs, par altérations progressives, par +micro-irréversibilités qui, accumulées, rendent un milieu de plus en +plus difficile à vivre. Le territoire subsiste, mais il cesse d'être +pleinement habitable pour ceux qui y étaient inscrits. Les formes de vie +persistent, mais elles doivent se transformer, se déplacer, se +recomposer. L'écologie introduit ainsi une dimension de désajustement +entre les cadres matériels et les existences qui s'y déploient. + +La scène se complique encore avec une troisième tension : celle qui +oppose la territorialité située à l'abstraction logistique. Les milieux, +pour être intégrés dans les dispositifs contemporains de décision, +doivent être traduits dans des formats compatibles avec des calculs +d'ensemble. Ils deviennent des ensembles de données, des unités de +mesure, des variables intégrables dans des modèles. Cette traduction +n'est pas en elle-même illégitime ; elle permet de rendre comparables +des situations, de prendre en compte des interactions complexes, +d'élaborer des politiques à grande échelle. Mais elle opère aussi une +transformation du rapport aux territoires. + +Car ce qui est traduit perd une partie de sa singularité. Un écosystème +devient un ensemble de fonctions. Un paysage devient une surface. Un +usage devient une donnée. Cette abstraction permet de déplacer les +décisions hors du cadre local, de les inscrire dans des logiques +globales, de les intégrer dans des chaînes d'optimisation. Mais elle +tend aussi à déposséder les acteurs situés de la capacité à faire valoir +ce qui, dans leur rapport au territoire, excède ces formats. La scène +locale se trouve ainsi reconfigurée par des dispositifs qui opèrent à +une autre échelle. + +Une quatrième tension traverse enfin l'ensemble de ces configurations : +celle qui oppose le différé nécessaire à la régulation à +l'irréversibilité des transformations. Toute scène de décision suppose +un temps : un temps pour que les positions se formulent, pour que les +arguments se confrontent, pour que les choix puissent être discutés. Or +les transformations écologiques engagent souvent des processus qui, une +fois enclenchés, ne peuvent être aisément inversés. Détruire une zone +humide, fragmenter un habitat, polluer durablement une ressource, ce +n'est pas seulement produire un effet immédiat ; c'est engager le milieu +dans une trajectoire dont il sera difficile de revenir. + +La dissymétrie entre le temps de la décision et le temps du monde +matériel forme l'un des nœuds les plus aigus de l'écologie +contemporaine. Elle rend la scène de régulation intrinsèquement fragile. +Car une décision peut être discutée, contestée, révisée en droit, tout +en produisant des effets irréversibles en fait. La possibilité de la +révision ne garantit pas la possibilité du retour. L'écologie oblige à +penser ensemble des temporalités hétérogènes, dont l'articulation est +loin d'aller de soi. + +C'est dans ce contexte que s'est progressivement constituée une arcalité +écologique dominante. Elle se présente comme une tentative de prise en +charge de ces tensions, sous les formes désormais bien connues du +développement durable, de la transition écologique, de la gestion +raisonnée des ressources. Elle reconnaît l'existence de limites, affirme +la nécessité de préserver les milieux et s'équipe d'instruments de +mesure, de cadres normatifs, d'objectifs. Elle donne ainsi aux enjeux +écologiques une forme institutionnelle. + +Ce faisant, elle transforme aussi le statut des tensions. Celles-ci sont +reformulées comme des problèmes de gestion, traitables par ajustements +techniques, innovations ou optimisations. Les incompatibilités +structurelles sont traduites en déséquilibres à corriger, en impacts à +réduire, en externalités à intégrer. La conflictualité n'est pas niée, +mais elle est reconfigurée de manière à devenir compatible avec les +cadres existants. + +Ce déplacement se manifeste notamment dans la place accordée aux +instruments de mesure. Bilans carbone, indicateurs de biodiversité, +scénarios de transition : ces outils permettent de rendre visibles des +phénomènes complexes, mais ils orientent aussi la manière dont ces +phénomènes sont appréhendés. En traduisant les milieux en séries de +données, ils tendent à privilégier ce qui est mesurable au détriment de +ce qui ne l'est pas. Ils déplacent alors l'attention vers l'optimisation +des indicateurs, au détriment de la transformation effective des +conditions d'habitabilité. + +La scène écologique se documente de plus en plus, mais s'ouvre de moins +en moins à une conflictualité explicite. Les décisions apparaissent +comme les conséquences nécessaires des données disponibles, plutôt que +comme des choix susceptibles d'être contestés. La régulation tend à se +présenter comme un prolongement du calcul. + +C'est depuis cette arcalité que se déploient les transformations +effectives des milieux — autrement dit, les cratialités écologiques. +L'analyse doit désormais entrer dans l'épaisseur des opérations, là où +ces tensions se traduisent en dispositifs matériels et en épreuves +d'habitabilité. Car les cratialités écologiques ne se laissent pas +saisir à partir des seuls cadres qui les décrivent. Elles s'éprouvent +dans des gestes, dans des chaînes de transformation, dans des +dispositifs qui affectent directement les milieux. Là où l'arcalité +organise des formes de lisibilité et de gouvernement, les cratialités +engagent des processus matériels : elles extraient, déplacent, +transforment, reconfigurent. Elles ne disent pas seulement le monde ; +elles le refont. + +Dans de nombreuses régions d'Afrique centrale, l'exploitation +industrielle du cobalt — ressource devenue stratégique pour les +technologies contemporaines — s'opère dans des conditions qui +illustrent de manière particulièrement nette cette dimension. En +République démocratique du Congo, où se concentre une part majeure des +réserves mondiales, les sites d'extraction combinent exploitation +industrielle et activités artisanales. Les paysages y sont profondément +transformés : sols retournés sur des profondeurs irréversibles, nappes +contaminées, habitats déplacés, continuités écologiques fragmentées. Les +chaînes de production qui relient ces sites aux industries globales sont +longues, complexes, souvent opaques. Les dispositifs juridiques +existent, les normes sont définies, les engagements sont affichés. Mais +sur le terrain, les conditions de travail, les impacts environnementaux +et les transformations sociales témoignent d'une réalité où la scène de +régulation peine à se constituer. + +Ce qui se donne à voir ici n'est pas l'absence pure de cadre, mais une +situation où la transformation des milieux et des existences déborde +largement les dispositifs censés l'encadrer. Les populations locales +sont affectées dans leurs conditions de vie — accès à l'eau, qualité +des sols, santé — sans disposer toujours des moyens effectifs de faire +valoir leurs positions dans des instances capables d'infléchir les +décisions. Les flux économiques qui structurent ces activités sont +transnationaux, tandis que les scènes de contestation restent largement +localisées. Ces dispositifs ne sont pas neutres : ils organisent la +protection d'intérêts situés, capables de déplacer les contraintes sans +en subir les effets. + +La tension entre territorialité et abstraction logistique prend ici une +forme particulièrement aiguë : ce qui est extrait localement s'inscrit +dans des chaînes globales où les lieux d'impact et les lieux de décision +sont dissociés. Ce qui se joue ici tient à cette dissociation radicale +entre les lieux où les décisions sont prises et ceux où leurs effets +deviennent irréversibles. + +Dans une configuration de ce type, la scène écologique ne disparaît pas +entièrement, mais elle est profondément déséquilibrée. Elle existe à +travers des normes, des audits, des engagements, mais elle est largement +débordée par la puissance des chaînes d'extraction. On peut parler ici +d'une forme de captation extensive, où la transformation matérielle des +milieux s'impose dans des conditions qui limitent fortement la capacité +des acteurs concernés à en faire un objet de régulation effective. La +conflictualité est présente — parfois violente — mais elle ne trouve +pas toujours les formes de comparution qui permettraient de la +transformer en processus de régulation. + +Dans d'autres configurations, ce n'est pas tant l'intensité de +l'extraction qui frappe que la manière dont les transformations sont +reconfigurées dans des dispositifs qui en modifient le sens. Les +politiques de compensation écologique en offrent une illustration +complémentaire. + +Lors de la construction de certaines infrastructures de transport en +Europe — lignes ferroviaires à grande vitesse, autoroutes, zones +d'aménagement — des surfaces importantes de milieux naturels sont +détruites ou fragmentées. En contrepartie, des programmes de +restauration sont mis en place ailleurs : reconstitution de zones +humides, création de corridors écologiques, financement d'actions de +conservation. Ces dispositifs mobilisent des expertises, des +financements, des suivis sur le long terme. Ils ne sont pas fictifs ; +ils produisent des effets réels. + +Mais ils opèrent aussi un déplacement décisif. La destruction n'est plus +niée : elle est rendue acceptable à condition d'être convertible. Ce qui +disparaît n'est pas seulement compensé ailleurs : c'est la singularité +même des milieux qui est rendue échangeable. Ce qui était initialement +un conflit situé — la transformation d'un milieu donné — devient un +problème de gestion d'équivalences. La question n'est plus : « ce +territoire peut-il supporter cette transformation ? », mais : « les +fonctions écologiques détruites ici peuvent-elles être reconstituées +ailleurs ? ». Le cadre de décision se déplace ainsi d'une scène locale à +une logique de compensation globale. + +Sous le nom de compensation se joue en réalité une opération de +traduction : des milieux hétérogènes sont rendus commensurables, des +temporalités disjointes sont alignées, des pertes localisées sont +intégrées dans une comptabilité globale qui ne connaît plus que des +équivalences. + +On observe ici un régime de simulation régulatrice. La scène écologique +continue d'exister sous la forme de procédures, de suivis et +d'évaluations. La conflictualité initiale, elle, se trouve transformée : +intégrée dans un système d'équivalences qui permet de maintenir la +continuité des projets tout en affichant une prise en compte des +impacts. La régulation demeure active, mais au prix d'une modification +de la nature même de ce qui est régulé. + +Ce déplacement ne doit pas être interprété de manière univoque. Il +permet parfois d'éviter des destructions plus importantes, de mobiliser +des ressources pour la restauration, de rendre visibles des enjeux. Mais +il introduit aussi une logique dans laquelle les singularités des +milieux peuvent être partiellement neutralisées au profit d'une +intelligibilité globale. La scène locale perd en centralité ce que gagne +la cohérence d'ensemble du dispositif. + +Une troisième forme de cratialité écologique se manifeste là où les +transformations des milieux sont étroitement liées à des dispositifs +d'infrastructure et de planification à grande échelle. Les barrages +hydroélectriques en constituent un exemple particulièrement éclairant. + +Dans des pays comme le Brésil ou l'Inde, la construction de grands +barrages a profondément reconfiguré les territoires. Ces infrastructures +permettent la production d'énergie, la régulation des flux hydriques, le +développement économique. Mais elles entraînent également des +transformations majeures : déplacement de populations, submersion de +territoires habités, modification des écosystèmes aquatiques, altération +durable des cycles sédimentaires. + +Les projets sont généralement encadrés par des dispositifs +institutionnels : études d'impact, consultations, négociations. Mais la +décision de construire un barrage s'inscrit souvent dans des logiques de +planification qui dépassent les cadres locaux. Les enjeux énergétiques, +économiques, géopolitiques sont mobilisés pour justifier ces projets. +Les populations affectées peuvent être consultées, indemnisées, +relocalisées, mais leur capacité à infléchir la décision reste limitée. + +On se trouve ici dans une configuration où la scène est déplacée et +stratifiée. Elle existe à plusieurs niveaux — local, national, +international — mais ces niveaux ne sont pas symétriques. Les +décisions structurantes sont prises à des échelles où les acteurs locaux +ont peu de prise. La tension entre souverainetés territoriales et +interdépendances globales se manifeste de manière particulièrement +nette. Les infrastructures apparaissent comme nécessaires à des +objectifs collectifs, mais leurs effets sont localisés et souvent +irréversibles. + +La cratialité écologique prend ici la forme d'une reconfiguration +systémique des milieux. Elle ne se limite pas à une extraction +ponctuelle ; elle redessine les équilibres d'un territoire dans son +ensemble. Elle produit des effets durables, qui engagent les conditions +d'habitabilité sur le long terme. Et elle le fait dans des cadres où la +mise en scène des tensions reste partielle. + +Une quatrième configuration apparaît là où les milieux sont gouvernés à +travers des dispositifs de données, de modélisation et de surveillance. +Les technologies contemporaines permettent de suivre en temps réel des +paramètres environnementaux, de modéliser des dynamiques complexes, +d'anticiper des évolutions. Ces outils sont mobilisés dans la gestion +des forêts, des ressources hydriques, des zones côtières, des climats +urbains. + +Dans les politiques de lutte contre le changement climatique, par +exemple, les décisions reposent largement sur des scénarios élaborés par +des institutions comme le Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur +l'évolution du climat. Ces scénarios intègrent des données multiples, +des hypothèses, des projections. Ils constituent des outils +indispensables pour orienter les politiques publiques. + +Mais ils contribuent aussi à installer la scène écologique dans un +régime de saturation experte. Les débats se structurent autour de +l'interprétation de modèles, de la validité des hypothèses, de la +pertinence des scénarios. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas, mais elle +se déplace vers des espaces où la maîtrise technique devient une +condition d'entrée dans la discussion. Les acteurs qui ne disposent pas +de ces compétences se trouvent en position de dépendance. + +La scène écologique devient ainsi à la fois plus informée et plus +difficilement appropriable. Elle est saturée de données, mais cette +saturation peut produire une forme d'opacité. Les décisions apparaissent +comme les conséquences nécessaires de calculs complexes, plutôt que +comme des choix susceptibles d'être contestés. La régulation tend à se +présenter comme un prolongement du calcul, plutôt que comme une mise en +tension explicite. Ce qui se perd alors n'est pas l'information, mais la +possibilité pratique d'en discuter les effets obligés. + +Face à ces formes de captation, de simulation, de déplacement et de +saturation, il serait pourtant erroné de conclure à une disparition +totale des possibilités de réouverture de la scène. Des configurations +existent où des formes d'archicration écologique émergent, encore +incomplètes mais bien réelles. + +Dans certaines régions d'Italie, des mobilisations contre la +privatisation de l'eau ont conduit à la mise en place de dispositifs de +gestion publique intégrant des formes de participation citoyenne. À +Naples, la transformation de l'entreprise de gestion de l'eau en une +structure à gouvernance élargie a ouvert des espaces où les décisions +peuvent être discutées, où les critères peuvent être rendus visibles, où +les acteurs peuvent apparaître. + +De même, dans plusieurs pays d'Amérique latine, des communautés locales +ont obtenu la reconnaissance de droits sur leurs territoires, leur +permettant de s'opposer à certains projets extractifs. Ces processus +sont souvent conflictuels, incertains, exposés à des retournements. Mais +ils témoignent de la possibilité d'une réouverture de la scène, où les +tensions peuvent être mises en comparution de manière plus explicite. + +Ces scènes restent fragiles. Elles ne suppriment pas les tensions, elles +ne garantissent pas leur résolution. Mais elles permettent de les rendre +visibles, discutables, transformables. Elles montrent que la +désarchicration écologique n'est pas une fatalité, mais un régime qui +peut être contesté, déplacé, partiellement réouvert. + +Ce parcours à travers différentes configurations permet de saisir plus +précisément la nature des cratialités écologiques contemporaines. Elles +ne relèvent pas d'une logique unique, mais d'un ensemble de régimes qui +combinent extraction, compensation, infrastructure, expertise, +participation. Elles produisent des effets matériels qui redéfinissent +les conditions d'habitabilité, tout en s'inscrivant dans des dispositifs +qui modifient la manière dont ces effets peuvent être mis en scène. + +Mais dans toutes ces configurations, une constante apparaît : la +difficulté à instituer des espaces où les tensions écologiques puissent +être pleinement exposées comme telles. Les milieux sont transformés, les +impacts sont mesurés, les décisions sont prises. Mais la comparution des +tensions — c'est-à-dire leur mise en débat explicite, contradictoire, +révisable — reste souvent partielle. + +C'est pourquoi la question écologique ne peut être réduite à une gestion +des ressources ou à une optimisation des impacts. Elle engage une +interrogation plus fondamentale sur les conditions dans lesquelles un +monde peut être maintenu comme habitable. Elle oblige à penser la +régulation non comme une harmonisation, mais comme une mise en tension +explicite de ce qui ne se laisse pas facilement concilier. + +C'est à ce niveau que l'analyse doit maintenant se porter : celui de +l'archicration écologique proprement dite, c'est-à-dire des conditions +sous lesquelles les transformations des milieux peuvent être rendues +disputables, exposées, révisables. + +C'est à ce point que la question change de régime. Tant que l'on demeure +au niveau de l'arcalité et des cratialités, l'analyse peut encore se +contenter de décrire des cadres, des opérations, des transformations. +Mais dès lors qu'il s'agit de savoir si les tensions écologiques peuvent +être effectivement régulées, une autre exigence s'impose : celle de la +scène. Non plus la scène comme métaphore, mais la scène comme condition +concrète de comparution, de confrontation, de révision. + +Car les tensions écologiques ne manquent ni de visibilité ni de gravité. +Elles sont documentées, quantifiées, médiatisées. Elles donnent lieu à +des alertes, à des rapports, à des mobilisations. Mais cette visibilité +n'équivaut pas à une mise en scène effective. Elle peut même, dans +certains cas, en tenir lieu, comme si la connaissance des tensions +suffisait à leur régulation. Or, ce qui manque le plus souvent, ce ne +sont pas des données supplémentaires, mais des dispositifs où ces +tensions puissent être exposées comme telles, c'est-à-dire comme +irréductibles, disputables, engageant des arbitrages non prédéterminés. + +L'archicration écologique commence précisément là : non pas dans la +reconnaissance abstraite des enjeux, mais dans l'institution de scènes +où les transformations des milieux peuvent être soumises à une +comparution effective. Cela suppose une rupture avec l'idée selon +laquelle la régulation écologique pourrait être entièrement déléguée à +des instruments techniques, à des modèles, à des indicateurs. Non pas +parce que ces instruments seraient inutiles, mais parce qu'ils ne +peuvent, à eux seuls, produire la forme de conflictualité explicite qui +conditionne toute régulation véritable. + +On peut, pour éclairer cette exigence, revenir sur certaines +configurations où des formes d'archicration ont été tentées, avec des +degrés variables de réussite. + +Dans le cas de la Convention citoyenne pour le climat, par exemple, un +dispositif inédit a été mis en place en France afin de faire délibérer +des citoyens tirés au sort sur les mesures à prendre pour réduire les +émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Ce dispositif a combiné plusieurs +éléments essentiels : accès à l'expertise, temps de délibération, +production collective de propositions, publicité des travaux. + +L'enjeu ne réside pas uniquement dans le contenu des propositions, mais +dans la forme même du dispositif. Pendant un temps limité, une scène a +été instituée où des tensions écologiques — entre modes de vie, +contraintes économiques, exigences climatiques — ont pu être exposées +et discutées. Les participants ont pu confronter des arguments, +interroger des experts, élaborer des compromis. + +Mais cette scène, pour réelle qu'elle ait été, n'a pas pleinement +accompli les conditions d'une archicration effective. Sa traduction dans +les décisions politiques a été partielle, sélective, parfois déformée. +La capacité du dispositif à infléchir durablement les orientations est +restée limitée. On se trouve ici dans une configuration d'archicration +émergente mais incomplète : la scène existe, mais sa prise sur le réel +reste fragile. + +Une première condition s'impose ici : une scène ne devient archicratique +qu'à la condition de disposer d'une capacité effective de +transformation. Sans cette capacité, elle demeure un espace de +discussion, voire de légitimation, mais non un lieu de régulation au +sens plein. + +Une deuxième condition apparaît à travers les conflits territoriaux liés +à des projets d'aménagement ou d'exploitation. Dans le cas de l'abandon +du projet d'aéroport de Notre-Dame-des-Landes, ce n'est pas la simple +existence de procédures formelles qui a permis la réouverture de la +scène, mais une combinaison de mobilisations, de contestations, de +reconfigurations politiques. + +Pendant des années, le projet a été encadré par des dispositifs +institutionnels : enquêtes publiques, débats, expertises. Mais ces +dispositifs n'ont pas suffi à produire une véritable mise en tension des +choix. La décision semblait, pour une large part, stabilisée en amont. +Ce n'est que par l'intensification du conflit — occupations, +mobilisations, affrontements — que la scène a été partiellement +réouverte, au point de rendre la poursuite du projet politiquement +coûteuse. + +Ce cas montre que l'archicration écologique ne peut être réduite à des +procédures formelles. Elle suppose une capacité de mise en tension +effective, qui peut passer par des formes conflictuelles, parfois +extra-institutionnelles. La scène n'est pas donnée ; elle est instituée, +et cette institution peut impliquer des rapports de force. Elle ne +s'ouvre pas spontanément : elle s'arrache. + +Une troisième condition se laisse entrevoir dans les dispositifs de +gestion collective des ressources, où des communautés locales +parviennent à organiser des formes de régulation situées. Dans certaines +régions d'Amérique latine, par exemple, des communautés ont obtenu la +reconnaissance de droits territoriaux leur permettant de participer +directement aux décisions concernant l'usage des ressources naturelles. + +Ces dispositifs ne sont pas exempts de tensions internes, ni de +contraintes externes. Ils peuvent être fragilisés par des pressions +économiques, des changements politiques, des divisions internes. Mais +ils montrent qu'il est possible d'instituer des scènes où les acteurs +directement concernés peuvent apparaître, faire valoir leurs positions, +confronter leurs intérêts. + +On peut parler ici d'archicration située, où la régulation s'opère à une +échelle où les effets des décisions sont directement perceptibles. Cette +proximité ne garantit pas la résolution des tensions, mais elle permet +leur exposition dans des conditions où elles peuvent être travaillées. + +Ces différentes configurations permettent de dégager, non pas un modèle +unique d'archicration écologique, mais un ensemble de conditions +minimales sans lesquelles aucune régulation effective ne peut avoir +lieu. + +La première de ces conditions est la visibilité des opérations. Il ne +suffit pas que les impacts soient mesurés ; il faut que les chaînes de +décision soient rendues lisibles. Qui décide ? Sur quelles bases ? Selon +quels critères ? Avec quelles alternatives écartées ? Tant que ces +questions restent opaques, la scène ne peut se constituer. + +La deuxième condition est la comparution des acteurs. Les populations +affectées, les collectifs concernés, les institutions impliquées doivent +pouvoir apparaître dans la scène, non comme des variables à intégrer +dans un calcul, mais comme des parties capables de soutenir des +positions, de formuler des objections, de proposer des alternatives. + +Vient ensuite l'exigence de réversibilité des décisions. Une scène où +les décisions sont irrévocables ne peut être archicratique. Il doit +exister des possibilités de révision, d'ajustement, de transformation. +Cette réversibilité est particulièrement difficile à instituer dans le +domaine écologique, en raison de l'irréversibilité matérielle de +certaines transformations. Mais c'est précisément ce qui rend la +condition d'autant plus exigeante. + +La quatrième condition est l'adéquation des échelles. Les tensions +écologiques se déploient à des échelles multiples : locales, nationales, +globales. Une archicration effective doit articuler ces niveaux, éviter +que des décisions globales s'imposent sans médiation aux contextes +locaux, ou que des enjeux globaux soient traités uniquement à des +échelles restreintes. + +Dernière exigence : reconnaître les irréductibilités elles-mêmes. Une +scène écologique ne peut viser à résoudre définitivement les tensions +qu'elle met en jeu. Elle doit accepter leur persistance, leur +conflictualité, leur caractère parfois insoluble. L'objectif n'est pas +l'harmonie, mais la co-viabilité. + +C'est ici que la notion de co-viabilité prend toute sa portée. Elle ne +désigne ni un état d'équilibre stable ni la disparition des tensions, +mais un régime dans lequel des formes de vie différentes peuvent +coexister sans être systématiquement sacrifiées, parce que les tensions +qui les opposent sont prises en charge dans des scènes précaires, +révisables et exposées au conflit. Elle suppose donc des dispositifs +capables de soutenir ces tensions sans les dissoudre, de rendre visibles +des incompatibilités sans les nier, et de permettre des arbitrages sans +les naturaliser. + +Or, ce que montrent les configurations contemporaines, c'est que ces +conditions sont rarement réunies. Les tensions écologiques sont souvent +connues, mais elles ne sont pas pleinement mises en scène. Elles sont +gérées, compensées, optimisées, mais rarement disputées dans des cadres +où leurs implications peuvent être réellement transformées. + +L'écologie apparaît ainsi aujourd'hui comme une épreuve archicratique +décisive. Là où l'économie pouvait encore masquer certaines de ses +tensions derrière des mécanismes d'abstraction, l'écologie les rend +matérielles, sensibles, parfois irréversibles. Elle oblige à affronter +la question de savoir si des scènes peuvent encore être instituées pour +réguler ce qui ne peut être entièrement calculé ni entièrement compensé. + +Dans ce contexte, certaines formes de réarchicration écologique peuvent +être envisagées, non comme des solutions globales, mais comme des +expérimentations situées. + +Des dispositifs de délibération multi-acteurs, associant habitants, +scientifiques, institutions, peuvent permettre de croiser des savoirs et +des perspectives. Des formes de gouvernance territoriale élargie peuvent +articuler des échelles différentes. Des mécanismes de révision +périodique des décisions peuvent introduire une temporalité ouverte dans +des processus autrement figés. + +Mais ces dispositifs ne valent qu'à cette condition : visibilité des +opérations, comparution des acteurs, réversibilité des décisions, +adéquation des échelles, reconnaissance des irréductibilités. À défaut, +ils ne rouvrent pas la scène ; ils la simulent. + +Ce qui apparaît alors avec netteté, c'est que la question écologique ne +peut être traitée comme un simple problème de gestion des ressources ou +de réduction des impacts. Elle engage une transformation des conditions +mêmes de la régulation. Elle oblige à repenser la manière dont les +décisions sont prises, dont les acteurs apparaissent, dont les conflits +sont traités. + +Elle révèle, en creux, les limites des régimes contemporains de +désarchicration. Là où les décisions sont prises sans comparution, les +effets deviennent de plus en plus difficiles à soutenir. Là où les +tensions sont neutralisées plutôt que travaillées, elles réapparaissent +sous des formes plus aiguës. Là où les milieux sont transformés sans +scène, les conditions d'habitabilité se dégradent. + +Elle ne constitue donc pas un domaine parmi d'autres, mais un point de +bascule. Elle met à l'épreuve la capacité des sociétés à instituer des +scènes de régulation à la hauteur des transformations qu'elles engagent. + +Ainsi, la section écologique ne peut se clore sur une promesse +d'équilibre ou de maîtrise. Elle doit se refermer sur une exigence plus +radicale : celle de la comparution du vivable lui-même. + +Ce qui est désormais en jeu dépasse la distribution de la valeur comme +la gestion des ressources : il s'agit de savoir si des formes de vie +peuvent encore demeurer dans des milieux qui ne leur sont pas rendus +impossibles. Le calcul, l'optimisation et l'accumulation de données n'y +suffisent pas. Tout dépend de l'existence — ou de l'absence — de +scènes où les transformations du monde deviennent visibles, contestables +et révisables. Il ne s'agit donc plus seulement de limiter les dégâts, +mais d'empêcher que le monde soit irréversiblement soustrait à ceux qui +doivent encore y vivre. + +La traversée peut alors se poursuivre vers une autre dimension où ces +tensions se redistribuent encore : celle du social. ## **5.3 — Tensions sociales : fragmentation, inégalités, dissociation** -La coupure ne prévient pas. Elle s’impose. +La coupure ne prévient pas. Elle s'impose. -Le versement n’apparaît pas. D’abord, rien — seulement un solde inchangé. Puis, en cherchant, une mention : « situation en cours de réexamen ». Quelques jours plus tard, une notification tombe. Le droit est suspendu. Motif : recalcul. Aucun détail sur l’opération elle-même, seulement une formule. L’allocataire tente de comprendre. Sur le site, un message renvoie à un formulaire. Le formulaire réclame une pièce déjà transmise. Au guichet, la file avance lentement ; les regards restent baissés, les dossiers serrés contre soi. Certains murmurent, d’autres renoncent avant d’atteindre le comptoir. Quand vient son tour, la réponse est brève : « il faut attendre que le traitement se fasse ». Au téléphone, une voix répète qu’il faut passer par l’espace en ligne. À chaque étape, une réponse ; nulle part, un lieu où la décision pourrait être reprise comme décision, ni même reformulée comme problème. +Le versement n'apparaît pas. D'abord, rien — seulement un solde +inchangé. Puis, en cherchant, une mention : « situation en cours de +réexamen ». Quelques jours plus tard, une notification tombe. Le droit +est suspendu. Motif : recalcul. Aucun détail sur l'opération elle-même, +seulement une formule. L'allocataire tente de comprendre. Sur le site, +un message renvoie à un formulaire. Le formulaire réclame une pièce déjà +transmise. Au guichet, la file avance lentement ; les regards restent +baissés, les dossiers serrés contre soi. Certains murmurent, d'autres +renoncent avant d'atteindre le comptoir. Quand vient son tour, la +réponse est brève : « il faut attendre que le traitement se fasse ». Au +téléphone, une voix répète qu'il faut passer par l'espace en ligne. À +chaque étape, une réponse ; nulle part, un lieu où la décision pourrait +être reprise comme décision, ni même reformulée comme problème. -Ce qui s’interrompt ne se réduit pas au droit suspendu. C’est la possibilité même de transformer cette suspension en objection recevable qui se dérobe. La perte la plus grave n’est donc pas d’abord celle de la ressource, mais celle de la forme par laquelle cette perte pourrait devenir contestable. +Ce qui s'interrompt ne se réduit pas au droit suspendu. C'est la +possibilité même de transformer cette suspension en objection recevable +qui se dérobe. La perte la plus grave n'est donc pas d'abord celle de la +ressource, mais celle de la forme par laquelle cette perte pourrait +devenir contestable. -Ce type de situation n’est pas une anomalie. Il exprime une transformation plus profonde du régime social. Les dispositifs continuent d’exister, de traiter, de classer, d’attribuer. Ils produisent des décisions, souvent nombreuses, parfois rapides, parfois différées, mais toujours opérantes. Pourtant, quelque chose se défait dans leur capacité à faire revenir vers eux ce qu’ils produisent sous forme de contradiction recevable. L’expérience — perte de revenu, désorganisation immédiate d’une vie déjà contrainte, arbitrages impossibles entre dépenses incompressibles, dépendance accrue à des solidarités fragiles — atteint un seuil où elle devrait pouvoir se dire comme litige. Elle n’y parvient pas. Elle reste suspendue : ni pleinement reconnue, ni totalement niée, mais rendue inopposable. +Ce type de situation n'est pas une anomalie. Il exprime une +transformation plus profonde du régime social. Les dispositifs +continuent d'exister, de traiter, de classer, d'attribuer. Ils +produisent des décisions, souvent nombreuses, parfois rapides, parfois +différées, mais toujours opérantes. Pourtant, quelque chose se défait +dans leur capacité à faire revenir vers eux ce qu'ils produisent sous +forme de contradiction recevable. L'expérience — perte de revenu, +désorganisation immédiate d'une vie déjà contrainte, arbitrages +impossibles entre dépenses incompressibles, dépendance accrue à des +solidarités fragiles — atteint un seuil où elle devrait pouvoir se +dire comme litige. Elle n'y parvient pas. Elle reste suspendue : ni +pleinement reconnue, ni totalement niée, mais rendue inopposable. -Il faut alors déplacer le regard. Les inégalités comptent, mais elles ne suffisent pas à dire ce qui se transforme. Une société peut mesurer ses écarts avec une précision croissante, les cartographier, les corriger partiellement, tout en devenant moins capable de faire apparaître ceux qu’ils affectent comme sujets d’une objection. Elle continue de distribuer, mais elle peine de plus en plus à faire comparaître. À ce point, le déséquilibre cesse d’être seulement distributif : il devient scénique. Ce qui vacille, alors, ce n’est pas seulement la répartition des positions, mais la possibilité même qu’une blessure sociale remonte jusqu’au niveau où elle obligerait le commun à se requalifier, à se justifier, à se transformer. +Il faut alors déplacer le regard. Les inégalités comptent, mais elles ne +suffisent pas à dire ce qui se transforme. Une société peut mesurer ses +écarts avec une précision croissante, les cartographier, les corriger +partiellement, tout en devenant moins capable de faire apparaître ceux +qu'ils affectent comme sujets d'une objection. Elle continue de +distribuer, mais elle peine de plus en plus à faire comparaître. À ce +point, le déséquilibre cesse d'être seulement distributif : il devient +scénique. Ce qui vacille, alors, ce n'est pas seulement la répartition +des positions, mais la possibilité même qu'une blessure sociale remonte +jusqu'au niveau où elle obligerait le commun à se requalifier, à se +justifier, à se transformer. -Plusieurs tensions s’y condensent, sans jamais se laisser isoler les unes des autres. L’égalisation normative rencontre d’abord la différenciation des existences. Les dispositifs exigent des formes stabilisées : statuts, catégories, seuils, trajectoires lisibles. Mais les vies qu’ils rencontrent sont faites de discontinuités, de bifurcations, de ruptures, d’ajustements précaires. Là où l’institution attend de la cohérence, elle rencontre de l’inachèvement ; là où elle impose une forme commune, elle produit une dissymétrie silencieuse entre ceux qui peuvent s’y ajuster et ceux qui y restent en défaut. Pourtant, cette dissymétrie n’apparaît pas comme une tension entre formes de vie et formes de règle. Elle est retraduite en insuffisance individuelle. Le défaut est alors imputé au sujet plutôt qu’au dispositif qui impose ses propres formes d’intelligibilité. +Plusieurs tensions s'y condensent, sans jamais se laisser isoler les +unes des autres. L'égalisation normative rencontre d'abord la +différenciation des existences. Les dispositifs exigent des formes +stabilisées : statuts, catégories, seuils, trajectoires lisibles. Mais +les vies qu'ils rencontrent sont faites de discontinuités, de +bifurcations, de ruptures, d'ajustements précaires. Là où l'institution +attend de la cohérence, elle rencontre de l'inachèvement ; là où elle +impose une forme commune, elle produit une dissymétrie silencieuse entre +ceux qui peuvent s'y ajuster et ceux qui y restent en défaut. Pourtant, +cette dissymétrie n'apparaît pas comme une tension entre formes de vie +et formes de règle. Elle est retraduite en insuffisance individuelle. Le +défaut est alors imputé au sujet plutôt qu'au dispositif qui impose ses +propres formes d'intelligibilité. -Cette opération est d’autant plus efficace que les inégalités sont visibles. Elles circulent sous forme de chiffres, de cartes, de rapports, de diagnostics publics. Mais cette visibilité ne garantit pas la reconnaissance. Elle peut même produire une exposition sans adresse : des écarts deviennent perceptibles sans que ceux qui les vivent puissent les porter comme objection. La visibilité tient alors lieu de comparution. +Cette opération est d'autant plus efficace que les inégalités sont +visibles. Elles circulent sous forme de chiffres, de cartes, de +rapports, de diagnostics publics. Mais cette visibilité ne garantit pas +la reconnaissance. Elle peut même produire une exposition sans adresse : +des écarts deviennent perceptibles sans que ceux qui les vivent puissent +les porter comme objection. La visibilité tient alors lieu de +comparution. -À cela s’ajoute une saturation des formes de symbolisation. Le social produit des catégories pour rendre le monde intelligible : allocataire, élève en difficulté, bénéficiaire, usager, public prioritaire. Mais lorsque ces catégories s’accumulent — dossiers, codes, indicateurs, suivis, historiques numériques — elles finissent par recouvrir ce qu’elles désignent. La situation devient lisible comme donnée, mais insaisissable comme expérience. Ce qui devait rendre le réel gouvernable le rend progressivement indisputable. +À cela s'ajoute une saturation des formes de symbolisation. Le social +produit des catégories pour rendre le monde intelligible : allocataire, +élève en difficulté, bénéficiaire, usager, public prioritaire. Mais +lorsque ces catégories s'accumulent — dossiers, codes, indicateurs, +suivis, historiques numériques — elles finissent par recouvrir ce +qu'elles désignent. La situation devient lisible comme donnée, mais +insaisissable comme expérience. Ce qui devait rendre le réel gouvernable +le rend progressivement indisputable. -Enfin, le temps lui-même se tend. Les existences blessées demandent du différé : du temps pour expliquer, pour reprendre, pour contester, pour reconstituer une continuité. Les dispositifs exigent l’instant : preuves immédiates, réponses rapides, actualisations continues, délais courts. Là où la vie appelle du temps, la gestion impose la vitesse et transforme ce décalage en faute. Le social retrouve ici, sous une autre forme, ce que l’économie exhibait déjà : une compression des délais de contradiction au profit d’une gouvernementalité de flux. +Enfin, le temps lui-même se tend. Les existences blessées demandent du +différé : du temps pour expliquer, pour reprendre, pour contester, pour +reconstituer une continuité. Les dispositifs exigent l'instant : preuves +immédiates, réponses rapides, actualisations continues, délais courts. +Là où la vie appelle du temps, la gestion impose la vitesse et +transforme ce décalage en faute. Le social retrouve ici, sous une autre +forme, ce que l'économie exhibait déjà : une compression des délais de +contradiction au profit d'une gouvernementalité de flux. -Ces tensions ne restent pas abstraites. Elles prennent forme dans une arcalité sociale qui détermine, souvent de manière implicite, ce qu’est une existence recevable. Dans un conseil de classe, les bulletins s’alignent. Les décisions se prennent rapidement, dans un temps contraint, sous la pression des orientations à formuler. Les dossiers sont examinés successivement. Les appréciations se ressemblent, se condensent, se stabilisent. Un élève est « insuffisant », « manque de travail », « doit s’investir davantage ». Mais derrière ces mots, une autre opération s’effectue. Il ne s’agit pas seulement d’évaluer des performances ; il s’agit de juger une capacité à habiter les attentes implicites du dispositif scolaire : anticiper ce qui est attendu sans que cela soit formulé, différer sa réponse, reformuler ce qui est demandé dans les termes attendus, adopter le bon rythme, le bon ton, la bonne posture. Un élève hésite, cherche ses mots, parle trop peu ou trop vite, ne comprend pas ce qui n’est pas explicitement dit. Il ne manque pas nécessairement de capacités ; il manque de prise sur les codes implicites. La tension entre une forme de vie et une forme scolaire se trouve alors absorbée dans le verdict : « manque d’investissement ». L’inégalité n’est plus reconnue comme telle ; elle est requalifiée en défaut individuel. +Ces tensions ne restent pas abstraites. Elles prennent forme dans une +arcalité sociale qui détermine, souvent de manière implicite, ce qu'est +une existence recevable. Dans un conseil de classe, les bulletins +s'alignent. Les décisions se prennent rapidement, dans un temps +contraint, sous la pression des orientations à formuler. Les dossiers +sont examinés successivement. Les appréciations se ressemblent, se +condensent, se stabilisent. Un élève est « insuffisant », « manque de +travail », « doit s'investir davantage ». Mais derrière ces mots, une +autre opération s'effectue. Il ne s'agit pas seulement d'évaluer des +performances ; il s'agit de juger une capacité à habiter les attentes +implicites du dispositif scolaire : anticiper ce qui est attendu sans +que cela soit formulé, différer sa réponse, reformuler ce qui est +demandé dans les termes attendus, adopter le bon rythme, le bon ton, la +bonne posture. Un élève hésite, cherche ses mots, parle trop peu ou trop +vite, ne comprend pas ce qui n'est pas explicitement dit. Il ne manque +pas nécessairement de capacités ; il manque de prise sur les codes +implicites. La tension entre une forme de vie et une forme scolaire se +trouve alors absorbée dans le verdict : « manque d'investissement ». +L'inégalité n'est plus reconnue comme telle ; elle est requalifiée en +défaut individuel. -Dans un rendez-vous administratif, la même logique se rejoue autrement, mais avec des conséquences immédiates. Le dossier est ouvert. Les pièces sont examinées. Une incohérence apparaît, une date ne correspond pas, un justificatif manque. L’agent reformule : « il faudra revenir avec tel document », « la situation n’est pas claire », « il manque une attestation ». Mais ce qui se présente — hébergement instable, travail discontinu, séparation récente, dépendance à des aides multiples — ne tient pas dans les catégories disponibles. Pour être traité, le vécu doit être reformulé selon les exigences du dispositif. Ce qui excède disparaît. La parole est bien là, mais elle ne suffit pas à faire entrer la situation dans une forme traitable. L’institution semble accueillir un cas ; elle exige surtout qu’il se laisse reformuler dans les termes qu’elle peut instruire. Ce qui échappe à ces cadres ne devient pas contradiction recevable ; cela demeure à la marge, sans prise réelle. +Dans un rendez-vous administratif, la même logique se rejoue autrement, +mais avec des conséquences immédiates. Le dossier est ouvert. Les pièces +sont examinées. Une incohérence apparaît, une date ne correspond pas, un +justificatif manque. L'agent reformule : « il faudra revenir avec tel +document », « la situation n'est pas claire », « il manque une +attestation ». Mais ce qui se présente — hébergement instable, travail +discontinu, séparation récente, dépendance à des aides multiples — ne +tient pas dans les catégories disponibles. Pour être traité, le vécu +doit être reformulé selon les exigences du dispositif. Ce qui excède +disparaît. La parole est bien là, mais elle ne suffit pas à faire entrer +la situation dans une forme traitable. L'institution semble accueillir +un cas ; elle exige surtout qu'il se laisse reformuler dans les termes +qu'elle peut instruire. Ce qui échappe à ces cadres ne devient pas +contradiction recevable ; cela demeure à la marge, sans prise réelle. -Une troisième scène, plus diffuse, mais tout aussi structurante, se déploie dans les dispositifs d’orientation, d’accompagnement et de suivi social. Un parcours est examiné. Il faut décider d’une orientation, d’un accompagnement, d’une prise en charge. Des critères sont mobilisés : âge, formation, situation familiale, antécédents, projet professionnel. Mais ce qui est évalué n’est pas seulement une situation ; c’est une capacité à se projeter dans une trajectoire intelligible. Il faut être capable de dire où l’on va, de formuler un projet cohérent, de s’inscrire dans une continuité narrative. Celui qui hésite, qui ne sait pas formuler son avenir dans les termes attendus, qui exprime des contradictions ou des incertitudes, se trouve rapidement en défaut. Ce défaut n’est pas nommé comme tel ; il est traduit en manque de motivation, en absence de projet, en inadéquation. Là encore, ce qui pourrait apparaître comme une tension entre une existence et une exigence institutionnelle est reformulé en insuffisance du sujet. +Une troisième scène, plus diffuse, mais tout aussi structurante, se +déploie dans les dispositifs d'orientation, d'accompagnement et de suivi +social. Un parcours est examiné. Il faut décider d'une orientation, d'un +accompagnement, d'une prise en charge. Des critères sont mobilisés : +âge, formation, situation familiale, antécédents, projet professionnel. +Mais ce qui est évalué n'est pas seulement une situation ; c'est une +capacité à se projeter dans une trajectoire intelligible. Il faut être +capable de dire où l'on va, de formuler un projet cohérent, de +s'inscrire dans une continuité narrative. Celui qui hésite, qui ne sait +pas formuler son avenir dans les termes attendus, qui exprime des +contradictions ou des incertitudes, se trouve rapidement en défaut. Ce +défaut n'est pas nommé comme tel ; il est traduit en manque de +motivation, en absence de projet, en inadéquation. Là encore, ce qui +pourrait apparaître comme une tension entre une existence et une +exigence institutionnelle est reformulé en insuffisance du sujet. -Ces scènes ont une portée structurante. Elles constituent le socle même de l’arcalité sociale. Elles définissent implicitement ce qu’est une existence recevable : une existence capable de se stabiliser, de se rendre lisible, de se projeter, de se conformer aux formats d’intelligibilité disponibles. Ce qui excède ces formats ne disparaît pas ; il devient plus difficile à faire apparaître comme contradiction. C’est précisément à partir de cette difficulté que la régulation change de régime. Elle passe dans une autre couche du social, moins visible comme norme que comme opération, moins déclarative que procédurale, moins interprétative que distributive. +Ces scènes ont une portée structurante. Elles constituent le socle même +de l'arcalité sociale. Elles définissent implicitement ce qu'est une +existence recevable : une existence capable de se stabiliser, de se +rendre lisible, de se projeter, de se conformer aux formats +d'intelligibilité disponibles. Ce qui excède ces formats ne disparaît +pas ; il devient plus difficile à faire apparaître comme contradiction. +C'est précisément à partir de cette difficulté que la régulation change +de régime. Elle passe dans une autre couche du social, moins visible +comme norme que comme opération, moins déclarative que procédurale, +moins interprétative que distributive. -La cratialité sociale n’a rien d’abstrait. Elle ne réside pas dans une domination générale qui planerait au-dessus des institutions ; elle s’exerce dans des chaînes de traitement, dans des scripts d’interaction, dans des files d’attente, dans des interfaces, dans des classements, dans des arbitrages dont la matérialité est parfois minuscule mais dont les effets sont décisifs. Elle ne produit pas uniquement des inégalités ; elle distribue aussi des écarts dans la capacité à faire exister une situation comme contradiction. Au-delà des biens et des places, elle répartit des possibilités d’apparition, des degrés d’écoute, des chances de reprise et des formats de traduction. Ce que l’arcalité socialise comme norme du sujet recevable, la cratialité l’opère comme sélection pratique des trajectoires. +La cratialité sociale n'a rien d'abstrait. Elle ne réside pas dans une +domination générale qui planerait au-dessus des institutions ; elle +s'exerce dans des chaînes de traitement, dans des scripts d'interaction, +dans des files d'attente, dans des interfaces, dans des classements, +dans des arbitrages dont la matérialité est parfois minuscule mais dont +les effets sont décisifs. Elle ne produit pas uniquement des inégalités +; elle distribue aussi des écarts dans la capacité à faire exister une +situation comme contradiction. Au-delà des biens et des places, elle +répartit des possibilités d'apparition, des degrés d'écoute, des chances +de reprise et des formats de traduction. Ce que l'arcalité socialise +comme norme du sujet recevable, la cratialité l'opère comme sélection +pratique des trajectoires. -Le logement constitue ici une forme lente et épaisse de captation. Tout semble, en principe, régi par des règles explicites : des critères sont affichés, des priorités sont connues, des procédures existent, des commissions statuent. L’ensemble donne l’image d’un espace administré, ordonné, juridiquement encadré. Pourtant, pour celui qui attend, ce cadre se présente moins comme une scène que comme une profondeur opaque de traitements successifs. Les dossiers circulent, s’empilent, se reconfigurent. Une naissance, une séparation, une perte d’emploi, un hébergement devenu intenable produisent des effets supposés sur la priorité, mais la manière dont ces effets sont intégrés reste en grande partie invisible. Des confirmations sont reçues, des mises à jour sont demandées, parfois une convocation survient, parfois rien. Le temps s’étire. Il ne prend pas la forme d’un délai politiquement intelligible ; il devient une matière indistincte, faite d’attentes renouvelées, de relances sans prise, de comparaisons silencieuses avec d’autres trajectoires qui, elles, semblent avancer. +Le logement constitue ici une forme lente et épaisse de captation. Tout +semble, en principe, régi par des règles explicites : des critères sont +affichés, des priorités sont connues, des procédures existent, des +commissions statuent. L'ensemble donne l'image d'un espace administré, +ordonné, juridiquement encadré. Pourtant, pour celui qui attend, ce +cadre se présente moins comme une scène que comme une profondeur opaque +de traitements successifs. Les dossiers circulent, s'empilent, se +reconfigurent. Une naissance, une séparation, une perte d'emploi, un +hébergement devenu intenable produisent des effets supposés sur la +priorité, mais la manière dont ces effets sont intégrés reste en grande +partie invisible. Des confirmations sont reçues, des mises à jour sont +demandées, parfois une convocation survient, parfois rien. Le temps +s'étire. Il ne prend pas la forme d'un délai politiquement intelligible +; il devient une matière indistincte, faite d'attentes renouvelées, de +relances sans prise, de comparaisons silencieuses avec d'autres +trajectoires qui, elles, semblent avancer. -Ce qui s’éprouve alors n’est pas seulement la précarité résidentielle. C’est la dépossession de la logique même selon laquelle cette précarité pourrait être discutée. Les critères ne sont pas absents ; ils ne se donnent simplement pas sous une forme opposable. L’attente n’est pas vide : elle est saturée d’opérations, de reclassements, d’arbitrages entre contingents, de priorités contradictoires, d’ajustements administratifs. Mais cette activité ne compose pas pour le demandeur une scène de comparution. Elle produit au contraire une dissociation entre la densité du traitement et la pauvreté de l’apparition. À mesure que les conditions de vie se dégradent — hôtel, hébergements provisoires, arrangements précaires avec des proches, déplacements répétés, promiscuité subie — la procédure continue de se présenter comme régulée. Ce qui manque n’est donc pas seulement un logement ; c’est la possibilité de savoir comment la décision qui tarde, ou qui refuse, pourrait être reprise comme contestation. La scène est ici captée : non pas supprimée, mais maintenue dans une forme telle qu’elle demeure pratiquement hors de portée de ceux qu’elle affecte. +Ce qui s'éprouve alors n'est pas seulement la précarité résidentielle. +C'est la dépossession de la logique même selon laquelle cette précarité +pourrait être discutée. Les critères ne sont pas absents ; ils ne se +donnent simplement pas sous une forme opposable. L'attente n'est pas +vide : elle est saturée d'opérations, de reclassements, d'arbitrages +entre contingents, de priorités contradictoires, d'ajustements +administratifs. Mais cette activité ne compose pas pour le demandeur une +scène de comparution. Elle produit au contraire une dissociation entre +la densité du traitement et la pauvreté de l'apparition. À mesure que +les conditions de vie se dégradent — hôtel, hébergements provisoires, +arrangements précaires avec des proches, déplacements répétés, +promiscuité subie — la procédure continue de se présenter comme +régulée. Ce qui manque n'est donc pas seulement un logement ; c'est la +possibilité de savoir comment la décision qui tarde, ou qui refuse, +pourrait être reprise comme contestation. La scène est ici captée : non +pas supprimée, mais maintenue dans une forme telle qu'elle demeure +pratiquement hors de portée de ceux qu'elle affecte. -Les plateformes administratives introduisent au contraire une forme plus sèche et plus dispersive de cette même dépossession. Ce qui, dans le logement, se donnait comme profondeur opaque d’un traitement, se présente ici comme fragmentation continue de l’expérience. Une erreur entraîne une suspension. Pour corriger, il faut entrer dans une série de micro-opérations : retrouver un document, comprendre une demande, modifier une donnée, attendre une validation, répondre à un nouveau message, constater qu’une information corrigée en invalide une autre. Chaque étape est précise, localisée, parfois même parfaitement lisible à son niveau. Mais l’ensemble ne se recompose jamais comme totalité intelligible. Une déclaration est rejetée pour incohérence, sans que la cohérence requise apparaisse en plein. Une pièce est demandée qui semble contredire une information déjà validée. Un champ doit être modifié, mais on ne sait pas selon quelle logique globale cette modification sera interprétée. L’usager avance alors par essais successifs, dans un régime où la règle ne se livre jamais comme règle d’ensemble, mais seulement comme succession de contraintes locales. +Les plateformes administratives introduisent au contraire une forme plus +sèche et plus dispersive de cette même dépossession. Ce qui, dans le +logement, se donnait comme profondeur opaque d'un traitement, se +présente ici comme fragmentation continue de l'expérience. Une erreur +entraîne une suspension. Pour corriger, il faut entrer dans une série de +micro-opérations : retrouver un document, comprendre une demande, +modifier une donnée, attendre une validation, répondre à un nouveau +message, constater qu'une information corrigée en invalide une autre. +Chaque étape est précise, localisée, parfois même parfaitement lisible à +son niveau. Mais l'ensemble ne se recompose jamais comme totalité +intelligible. Une déclaration est rejetée pour incohérence, sans que la +cohérence requise apparaisse en plein. Une pièce est demandée qui semble +contredire une information déjà validée. Un champ doit être modifié, +mais on ne sait pas selon quelle logique globale cette modification sera +interprétée. L'usager avance alors par essais successifs, dans un régime +où la règle ne se livre jamais comme règle d'ensemble, mais seulement +comme succession de contraintes locales. -Ce qui devait simplifier la relation produit une désagrégation de la scène. Il n’y a plus un lieu où le problème peut être posé, mais une série d’ajustements dont aucun ne suffit à faire tenir la situation dans son entier. Le sujet ne rencontre pas un interlocuteur avec lequel il pourrait construire un litige ; il traverse des fragments d’interaction qui traitent quelque chose de sa situation sans jamais permettre qu’elle apparaisse comme telle. À cette fragmentation s’ajoute une temporalité spécifique : celle d’une économie d’attente où l’on guette un accusé de réception, une validation, une réouverture de dossier, un retour humain qui n’arrive pas toujours, ou trop tard. Le temps n’est plus celui, conflictuel, d’une contradiction instruite ; il devient une matière diluée qui fatigue, décourage, disperse. La scène n’est pas interdite. Elle est empêchée par la dispersion, par la surcharge procédurale et par la discontinuité des séquences d’interaction. Là où l’arcalité sociale exigeait déjà une existence capable de se rendre lisible, la cratialité numérique ajoute la nécessité de savoir se maintenir dans un flux d’ajustements sans centre apparent. +Ce qui devait simplifier la relation produit une désagrégation de la +scène. Il n'y a plus un lieu où le problème peut être posé, mais une +série d'ajustements dont aucun ne suffit à faire tenir la situation dans +son entier. Le sujet ne rencontre pas un interlocuteur avec lequel il +pourrait construire un litige ; il traverse des fragments d'interaction +qui traitent quelque chose de sa situation sans jamais permettre qu'elle +apparaisse comme telle. À cette fragmentation s'ajoute une temporalité +spécifique : celle d'une économie d'attente où l'on guette un accusé de +réception, une validation, une réouverture de dossier, un retour humain +qui n'arrive pas toujours, ou trop tard. Le temps n'est plus celui, +conflictuel, d'une contradiction instruite ; il devient une matière +diluée qui fatigue, décourage, disperse. La scène n'est pas interdite. +Elle est empêchée par la dispersion, par la surcharge procédurale et par +la discontinuité des séquences d'interaction. Là où l'arcalité sociale +exigeait déjà une existence capable de se rendre lisible, la cratialité +numérique ajoute la nécessité de savoir se maintenir dans un flux +d'ajustements sans centre apparent. -Le travail fragmenté introduit un autre régime, plus radical encore, parce qu’il affecte non plus seulement la relation à un droit ou à une procédure, mais la possibilité même que la contribution devienne lieu de contestation. Ce qui se transforme ici, ce n’est pas seulement la stabilité de l’emploi, mais le lien entre activité, reconnaissance et scène collective. Missions courtes, horaires éclatés, dépendance à des plateformes, disponibilité continuellement actualisée : l’activité persiste, souvent intense, souvent indispensable, mais elle ne s’inscrit plus nécessairement dans des formes où elle peut être portée comme conflit partageable. La journée commence sans point fixe. Une notification surgit : mission disponible, à accepter immédiatement. Le lieu change, l’horaire aussi. Le trajet n’est pas compté. Entre deux tâches, il faut attendre, mais cette attente n’est ni du travail reconnu ni du repos véritable. Elle devient un temps flottant, pourtant indispensable au fonctionnement du dispositif. Le travail déborde de ses limites sans être reconnu dans ce débordement. +Le travail fragmenté introduit un autre régime, plus radical encore, +parce qu'il affecte non plus seulement la relation à un droit ou à une +procédure, mais la possibilité même que la contribution devienne lieu de +contestation. Ce qui se transforme ici, ce n'est pas seulement la +stabilité de l'emploi, mais le lien entre activité, reconnaissance et +scène collective. Missions courtes, horaires éclatés, dépendance à des +plateformes, disponibilité continuellement actualisée : l'activité +persiste, souvent intense, souvent indispensable, mais elle ne s'inscrit +plus nécessairement dans des formes où elle peut être portée comme +conflit partageable. La journée commence sans point fixe. Une +notification surgit : mission disponible, à accepter immédiatement. Le +lieu change, l'horaire aussi. Le trajet n'est pas compté. Entre deux +tâches, il faut attendre, mais cette attente n'est ni du travail reconnu +ni du repos véritable. Elle devient un temps flottant, pourtant +indispensable au fonctionnement du dispositif. Le travail déborde de ses +limites sans être reconnu dans ce débordement. -Au terme de la journée, quelque chose a bien eu lieu : des tâches ont été accomplies, des objectifs remplis, des services rendus. Mais cette activité ne s’est pas déposée dans une scène où elle pourrait être discutée. Elle a été mesurée, validée, parfois notée. Une évaluation tombe : score, appréciation, maintien ou non dans le flux des missions. Cette évaluation peut changer l’accès au travail du jour au lendemain. Pourtant, il n’existe pas toujours de lieu où les critères puissent être contestés, ni même compris dans leur genèse. Le travailleur est présent dans l’opération ; il est absent de la scène où cette opération pourrait être reprise. Ce qui se joue ici ne relève donc pas seulement de la précarité. C’est une transformation du rapport entre contribution et comparution. Le travail continue d’organiser la production, mais il ne fournit plus les formes stables à partir desquelles la contestation pourrait se soutenir. Là où 5.1 montrait déjà comment l’économie abstrait la contribution et redistribue les possibilités d’existence à travers des dispositifs de notation, de solvabilité ou de performance, 5.3 en montre la traduction vécue : une présence productive sans lieu de reprise, un effort réel sans scène stable de reconnaissance conflictuelle. +Au terme de la journée, quelque chose a bien eu lieu : des tâches ont +été accomplies, des objectifs remplis, des services rendus. Mais cette +activité ne s'est pas déposée dans une scène où elle pourrait être +discutée. Elle a été mesurée, validée, parfois notée. Une évaluation +tombe : score, appréciation, maintien ou non dans le flux des missions. +Cette évaluation peut changer l'accès au travail du jour au lendemain. +Pourtant, il n'existe pas toujours de lieu où les critères puissent être +contestés, ni même compris dans leur genèse. Le travailleur est présent +dans l'opération ; il est absent de la scène où cette opération pourrait +être reprise. Ce qui se joue ici ne relève donc pas seulement de la +précarité. C'est une transformation du rapport entre contribution et +comparution. Le travail continue d'organiser la production, mais il ne +fournit plus les formes stables à partir desquelles la contestation +pourrait se soutenir. Là où 5.1 montrait déjà comment l'économie +abstrait la contribution et redistribue les possibilités d'existence à +travers des dispositifs de notation, de solvabilité ou de performance, +5.3 en montre la traduction vécue : une présence productive sans lieu de +reprise, un effort réel sans scène stable de reconnaissance +conflictuelle. -La dimension territoriale du social ajoute encore une couche à cette cratialité. Une adresse, un quartier, un établissement, une commune peuvent fonctionner comme des opérateurs anticipés de tri. Ils n’interviennent pas toujours comme critères explicites ; ils agissent souvent comme des scripts silencieux de l’interaction. Un curriculum vitae correspond aux attentes, mais l’adresse indique un quartier réputé précaire : l’entretien n’est pas proposé. Une rencontre a lieu, puis le ton change dès que la localisation est évoquée ; des questions indirectes apparaissent, des réserves s’installent, rien n’est dit frontalement, mais la décision est déjà orientée. Le territoire ne sert plus seulement de support à la vie sociale ; il devient un schème interprétatif anticipé. Il ne décrit pas une position ; il produit un jugement probable. Avant même toute comparution, une existence est déjà située, évaluée, parfois disqualifiée. La scène est ici partiellement préconfigurée : ce qui devrait se jouer dans l’échange a commencé avant lui, à travers des signaux spatiaux qui condensent des réputations, des statistiques, des imaginations administratives ou patronales. +La dimension territoriale du social ajoute encore une couche à cette +cratialité. Une adresse, un quartier, un établissement, une commune +peuvent fonctionner comme des opérateurs anticipés de tri. Ils +n'interviennent pas toujours comme critères explicites ; ils agissent +souvent comme des scripts silencieux de l'interaction. Un curriculum +vitae correspond aux attentes, mais l'adresse indique un quartier réputé +précaire : l'entretien n'est pas proposé. Une rencontre a lieu, puis le +ton change dès que la localisation est évoquée ; des questions +indirectes apparaissent, des réserves s'installent, rien n'est dit +frontalement, mais la décision est déjà orientée. Le territoire ne sert +plus seulement de support à la vie sociale ; il devient un schème +interprétatif anticipé. Il ne décrit pas une position ; il produit un +jugement probable. Avant même toute comparution, une existence est déjà +située, évaluée, parfois disqualifiée. La scène est ici partiellement +préconfigurée : ce qui devrait se jouer dans l'échange a commencé avant +lui, à travers des signaux spatiaux qui condensent des réputations, des +statistiques, des imaginations administratives ou patronales. -Il existe enfin des scènes où, à l’inverse, tout semble réuni pour que la parole ait lieu. Une réunion publique est organisée dans le cadre d’un projet de rénovation, d’une réorganisation de service ou d’une concertation locale. Une salle est préparée, un diaporama projeté, un animateur introduit la séance, rappelle les règles, distribue le temps. Les interventions commencent. Des habitants évoquent des difficultés concrètes : déplacements, nuisances, relogement, perte de liens, transformation des usages. Les prises de parole sont écoutées, reformulées, parfois notées. Tout semble indiquer qu’une scène existe. Et pourtant, l’essentiel se joue ailleurs. Les paramètres décisifs — budget, calendrier, choix architecturaux majeurs, arbitrages politiques fondamentaux — ont déjà été arrêtés en amont ou déplacés à des échelles non accessibles à cette rencontre. Les marges d’ajustement portent sur des éléments secondaires. La parole circule, mais elle ne déplace pas. +Il existe enfin des scènes où, à l'inverse, tout semble réuni pour que +la parole ait lieu. Une réunion publique est organisée dans le cadre +d'un projet de rénovation, d'une réorganisation de service ou d'une +concertation locale. Une salle est préparée, un diaporama projeté, un +animateur introduit la séance, rappelle les règles, distribue le temps. +Les interventions commencent. Des habitants évoquent des difficultés +concrètes : déplacements, nuisances, relogement, perte de liens, +transformation des usages. Les prises de parole sont écoutées, +reformulées, parfois notées. Tout semble indiquer qu'une scène existe. +Et pourtant, l'essentiel se joue ailleurs. Les paramètres décisifs — budget, calendrier, choix architecturaux majeurs, arbitrages politiques +fondamentaux — ont déjà été arrêtés en amont ou déplacés à des +échelles non accessibles à cette rencontre. Les marges d'ajustement +portent sur des éléments secondaires. La parole circule, mais elle ne +déplace pas. -C’est ici que se révèle le régime propre de la scène simulée. Non pas l’absence de participation, mais la production d’une scène où l’on peut parler sans que ce qui fait problème puisse être déplacé. Il ne s’agit pas d’un simple défaut d’exécution ; c’est une configuration. La participation devient alors une modalité d’intégration de la parole dans un dispositif qu’elle n’affecte qu’à la marge. Le conflit y est accueilli à condition d’être converti en expression, puis l’expression en trace, et la trace en élément de légitimation du processus. La scène n’est pas supprimée ; elle est organisée avec soin, précisément pour que son existence puisse attester qu’il y a eu écoute. Mais cette écoute ne mord pas sur l’architecture de la décision. On parle, mais rien d’essentiel ne peut être déplacé. La scène est simulée. +C'est ici que se révèle le régime propre de la scène simulée. Non pas +l'absence de participation, mais la production d'une scène où l'on peut +parler sans que ce qui fait problème puisse être déplacé. Il ne s'agit +pas d'un simple défaut d'exécution ; c'est une configuration. La +participation devient alors une modalité d'intégration de la parole dans +un dispositif qu'elle n'affecte qu'à la marge. Le conflit y est +accueilli à condition d'être converti en expression, puis l'expression +en trace, et la trace en élément de légitimation du processus. La scène +n'est pas supprimée ; elle est organisée avec soin, précisément pour que +son existence puisse attester qu'il y a eu écoute. Mais cette écoute ne +mord pas sur l'architecture de la décision. On parle, mais rien +d'essentiel ne peut être déplacé. La scène est simulée. -Ces différentes configurations ne relèvent pas d’un seul régime. Elles composent un ensemble instable où plusieurs formes de scène coexistent, se superposent et se recouvrent. Ici, la scène est captée : le cadre existe, mais sa prise échappe. Là, elle est empêchée : la dispersion rend impossible toute reprise. Ailleurs, elle est dissoute : l’activité persiste sans lieu de contestation stable. Plus loin, elle est simulée : la participation est organisée sans pouvoir réel. Dans certains cas encore, elle est anticipée : la décision est préconfigurée avant même l’échange. Toute la difficulté consiste alors à maintenir ces distinctions actives, à ne pas les lisser dans un diagnostic général sur la « crise sociale ». Une scène empêchée ne produit pas les mêmes effets qu’une scène captée. Une scène simulée ne neutralise pas comme une scène saturée. Une scène dissoute ne décompose pas l’expérience comme une scène absente. Or c’est précisément dans ces différences que se logent les possibilités de réouverture. Car ce qui doit être reconquis n’est pas une « bonne participation » en général, mais des formes situées de comparution adaptées aux régimes spécifiques de défaillance que produit la cratialité sociale. +Ces différentes configurations ne relèvent pas d'un seul régime. Elles +composent un ensemble instable où plusieurs formes de scène coexistent, +se superposent et se recouvrent. Ici, la scène est captée : le cadre +existe, mais sa prise échappe. Là, elle est empêchée : la dispersion +rend impossible toute reprise. Ailleurs, elle est dissoute : l'activité +persiste sans lieu de contestation stable. Plus loin, elle est simulée : +la participation est organisée sans pouvoir réel. Dans certains cas +encore, elle est anticipée : la décision est préconfigurée avant même +l'échange. Toute la difficulté consiste alors à maintenir ces +distinctions actives, à ne pas les lisser dans un diagnostic général sur +la « crise sociale ». Une scène empêchée ne produit pas les mêmes effets +qu'une scène captée. Une scène simulée ne neutralise pas comme une scène +saturée. Une scène dissoute ne décompose pas l'expérience comme une +scène absente. Or c'est précisément dans ces différences que se logent +les possibilités de réouverture. Car ce qui doit être reconquis n'est +pas une « bonne participation » en général, mais des formes situées de +comparution adaptées aux régimes spécifiques de défaillance que produit +la cratialité sociale. -Entre les scènes empêchées, captées, dissoutes ou simulées, il existe des configurations intermédiaires, moins spectaculaires mais décisives, où la scène subsiste sans parvenir à accomplir sa fonction. Dans certains services publics, l’accueil demeure. Des agents reçoivent, écoutent, expliquent, orientent. Une personne arrive avec une situation embrouillée : perte d’emploi, séparation, dettes accumulées, suspension de droits, relances restées sans réponse. Le récit est hésitant, parfois décousu. L’agent tente de faire tenir ensemble ce qui se présente dispersé. Pendant un moment, quelque chose comme une scène apparaît. +Entre les scènes empêchées, captées, dissoutes ou simulées, il existe +des configurations intermédiaires, moins spectaculaires mais décisives, +où la scène subsiste sans parvenir à accomplir sa fonction. Dans +certains services publics, l'accueil demeure. Des agents reçoivent, +écoutent, expliquent, orientent. Une personne arrive avec une situation +embrouillée : perte d'emploi, séparation, dettes accumulées, suspension +de droits, relances restées sans réponse. Le récit est hésitant, parfois +décousu. L'agent tente de faire tenir ensemble ce qui se présente +dispersé. Pendant un moment, quelque chose comme une scène apparaît. -Mais cette apparition reste précaire. Le temps est contraint, les rendez-vous s’enchaînent, les procédures encadrent étroitement les marges d’action. Les critères sont fixés en amont ; les possibilités de dérogation sont rares, souvent suspendues à d’autres validations. L’effort porte alors moins sur la transformation de la situation que sur son ajustement aux formats disponibles. La scène n’a pas disparu ; elle se referme trop vite. Elle reçoit, reformule, traduit, mais peine à transformer. +Mais cette apparition reste précaire. Le temps est contraint, les +rendez-vous s'enchaînent, les procédures encadrent étroitement les +marges d'action. Les critères sont fixés en amont ; les possibilités de +dérogation sont rares, souvent suspendues à d'autres validations. +L'effort porte alors moins sur la transformation de la situation que sur +son ajustement aux formats disponibles. La scène n'a pas disparu ; elle +se referme trop vite. Elle reçoit, reformule, traduit, mais peine à +transformer. -Il en va de même dans les formes collectives de conflictualité. Des espaces de représentation subsistent. Des tentatives de conflit organisé existent encore. Mais ils peinent à se stabiliser. Les collectifs se disloquent, les trajectoires se fragmentent, les situations ne coïncident plus assez longtemps pour produire un différend commun. Le conflit ne disparaît pas ; il ne tient plus. Il s’exprime par refus isolés, départs, désengagements, retraits. Là encore, la scène existe, mais elle ne dure pas assez pour faire prise. C’est cela qu’il faut entendre par scène fragilisée : non l’absence de régulation, mais une régulation qui n’arrive plus à soutenir ce qu’elle fait apparaître. +Il en va de même dans les formes collectives de conflictualité. Des +espaces de représentation subsistent. Des tentatives de conflit organisé +existent encore. Mais ils peinent à se stabiliser. Les collectifs se +disloquent, les trajectoires se fragmentent, les situations ne +coïncident plus assez longtemps pour produire un différend commun. Le +conflit ne disparaît pas ; il ne tient plus. Il s'exprime par refus +isolés, départs, désengagements, retraits. Là encore, la scène existe, +mais elle ne dure pas assez pour faire prise. C'est cela qu'il faut +entendre par scène fragilisée : non l'absence de régulation, mais une +régulation qui n'arrive plus à soutenir ce qu'elle fait apparaître. -À côté de ces scènes fragilisées, d’autres formes existent, plus faibles encore, mais d’une autre manière décisives. Elles n’ont pas la puissance des scènes instituées ; elles n’en ont parfois même pas la stabilité. Mais elles rouvrent ce qui, ailleurs, restait sans adresse. Dans certaines permanences associatives, dans des collectifs informels, dans des espaces de médiation, une personne arrive avec une situation qui, ailleurs, n’a pas trouvé de prise. Elle apporte des documents incomplets, des courriers restés sans réponse, des fragments d’histoire difficilement articulables. Elle raconte, s’interrompt, revient en arrière. Le récit ne tient pas encore. Quelqu’un écoute. Non pour juger immédiatement, ni pour appliquer un protocole standard, mais pour faire tenir ensemble ce qui arrive dispersé. Une chronologie se reconstruit. Des liens apparaissent entre des événements qui, jusque-là, restaient juxtaposés. Un point de blocage est identifié. Une hypothèse est formulée : ici, il faudrait contester ; là, reformuler ; ailleurs, demander autrement. +À côté de ces scènes fragilisées, d'autres formes existent, plus faibles +encore, mais d'une autre manière décisives. Elles n'ont pas la puissance +des scènes instituées ; elles n'en ont parfois même pas la stabilité. +Mais elles rouvrent ce qui, ailleurs, restait sans adresse. Dans +certaines permanences associatives, dans des collectifs informels, dans +des espaces de médiation, une personne arrive avec une situation qui, +ailleurs, n'a pas trouvé de prise. Elle apporte des documents +incomplets, des courriers restés sans réponse, des fragments d'histoire +difficilement articulables. Elle raconte, s'interrompt, revient en +arrière. Le récit ne tient pas encore. Quelqu'un écoute. Non pour juger +immédiatement, ni pour appliquer un protocole standard, mais pour faire +tenir ensemble ce qui arrive dispersé. Une chronologie se reconstruit. +Des liens apparaissent entre des événements qui, jusque-là, restaient +juxtaposés. Un point de blocage est identifié. Une hypothèse est +formulée : ici, il faudrait contester ; là, reformuler ; ailleurs, +demander autrement. -Rien n’est garanti. La situation ne se résout pas nécessairement. Mais quelque chose change. Ce qui était vécu comme une suite d’épreuves disjointes devient, au moins partiellement, une situation formulable. Ce qui ne pouvait pas être dit comme problème commence à se constituer comme tel. Une adresse apparaît. Un tiers existe. Un temps se rouvre. Ce sont des scènes faibles. Elles n’ont ni la puissance institutionnelle des grandes scènes de régulation ni, le plus souvent, une capacité directe de transformation. Mais elles produisent ce qui manque ailleurs : une possibilité minimale de reprise. Elles réintroduisent trois conditions décisives : un tiers capable d’entendre et de reformuler ; un temps qui ne soit pas immédiatement saturé par le traitement ; un espace où la situation peut être reprise comme situation. Elles ne suppriment pas les tensions. Elles empêchent qu’elles se referment entièrement. +Rien n'est garanti. La situation ne se résout pas nécessairement. Mais +quelque chose change. Ce qui était vécu comme une suite d'épreuves +disjointes devient, au moins partiellement, une situation formulable. Ce +qui ne pouvait pas être dit comme problème commence à se constituer +comme tel. Une adresse apparaît. Un tiers existe. Un temps se rouvre. Ce +sont des scènes faibles. Elles n'ont ni la puissance institutionnelle +des grandes scènes de régulation ni, le plus souvent, une capacité +directe de transformation. Mais elles produisent ce qui manque ailleurs +: une possibilité minimale de reprise. Elles réintroduisent trois +conditions décisives : un tiers capable d'entendre et de reformuler ; un +temps qui ne soit pas immédiatement saturé par le traitement ; un espace +où la situation peut être reprise comme situation. Elles ne suppriment +pas les tensions. Elles empêchent qu'elles se referment entièrement. -C’est à ce niveau que l’inégalité change de nature. Elle ne sépare plus seulement des positions, des revenus ou des statuts. Elle sépare des capacités d’apparition. Entre ceux qui peuvent faire exister leur situation dans une scène où elle devient contradiction, et ceux dont l’expérience reste sans lieu, se creuse un écart qui ne se laisse plus réduire à des indicateurs sociaux classiques. Lorsque cette capacité d’apparition se réduit, l’expérience ne disparaît pas ; elle se déplace. Ce qui ne peut être porté comme conflit dans une scène sociale suffisamment consistante se retourne vers l’intérieur. L’expérience sociale se déplace alors sur le versant psychique, non parce qu’elle serait d’abord intérieure, mais parce que les conditions de son exposition publique se raréfient. La fatigue ne tient pas seulement à l’effort matériel ; elle tient à l’impossibilité de faire reconnaître cet effort. La honte ne provient pas seulement de la situation ; elle provient de l’incapacité à la formuler comme injustice. L’auto-surveillance ne relève pas seulement d’une intériorisation des normes ; elle correspond à une adaptation à des dispositifs où toute déviation peut produire des effets immédiats sans possibilité de reprise. Ainsi, ce qui ne peut plus se soutenir comme différend devient charge intérieure. +C'est à ce niveau que l'inégalité change de nature. Elle ne sépare plus +seulement des positions, des revenus ou des statuts. Elle sépare des +capacités d'apparition. Entre ceux qui peuvent faire exister leur +situation dans une scène où elle devient contradiction, et ceux dont +l'expérience reste sans lieu, se creuse un écart qui ne se laisse plus +réduire à des indicateurs sociaux classiques. Lorsque cette capacité +d'apparition se réduit, l'expérience ne disparaît pas ; elle se déplace. +Ce qui ne peut être porté comme conflit dans une scène sociale +suffisamment consistante se retourne vers l'intérieur. L'expérience +sociale se déplace alors sur le versant psychique, non parce qu'elle +serait d'abord intérieure, mais parce que les conditions de son +exposition publique se raréfient. La fatigue ne tient pas seulement à +l'effort matériel ; elle tient à l'impossibilité de faire reconnaître +cet effort. La honte ne provient pas seulement de la situation ; elle +provient de l'incapacité à la formuler comme injustice. +L'auto-surveillance ne relève pas seulement d'une intériorisation des +normes ; elle correspond à une adaptation à des dispositifs où toute +déviation peut produire des effets immédiats sans possibilité de +reprise. Ainsi, ce qui ne peut plus se soutenir comme différend devient +charge intérieure. -Ce déplacement n’est pas secondaire. Il marque un seuil critique. Car une société peut supporter des inégalités importantes tant qu’elle maintient des scènes où elles peuvent être contestées, discutées, transformées. Mais lorsque ces scènes se raréfient, les tensions ne disparaissent pas : elles se déplacent vers des formes moins visibles, plus diffuses, plus difficiles à traiter. +Ce déplacement n'est pas secondaire. Il marque un seuil critique. Car +une société peut supporter des inégalités importantes tant qu'elle +maintient des scènes où elles peuvent être contestées, discutées, +transformées. Mais lorsque ces scènes se raréfient, les tensions ne +disparaissent pas : elles se déplacent vers des formes moins visibles, +plus diffuses, plus difficiles à traiter. -Dans le même temps, ces tensions deviennent de plus en plus visibles. Elles circulent sous forme de chiffres, d’images, de reportages, de catégories publiques. Elles sont commentées, analysées, mises en récit. Le social n’est pas invisible. Il est exposé. Mais cette visibilité ne vaut pas reconnaissance. Elle peut produire une exposition sans réponse : on montre, on décrit, on classe, sans ouvrir la scène où ceux qui sont ainsi désignés pourraient contester. +Dans le même temps, ces tensions deviennent de plus en plus visibles. +Elles circulent sous forme de chiffres, d'images, de reportages, de +catégories publiques. Elles sont commentées, analysées, mises en récit. +Le social n'est pas invisible. Il est exposé. Mais cette visibilité ne +vaut pas reconnaissance. Elle peut produire une exposition sans réponse +: on montre, on décrit, on classe, sans ouvrir la scène où ceux qui sont +ainsi désignés pourraient contester. -C’est ici que le social rencontre le médiatique à son point de nécessité. Ce qui ne peut plus se soutenir comme contradiction dans une scène sociale suffisamment consistante ne cesse pas pour autant d’exister ; cela se déplace vers des espaces où la visibilité elle-même devient l’enjeu du conflit. Les situations apparaissent, disparaissent, reviennent, se trouvent amplifiées, recadrées, disqualifiées, relancées, sans toujours parvenir à prendre la forme stable d’un différend. +C'est ici que le social rencontre le médiatique à son point de +nécessité. Ce qui ne peut plus se soutenir comme contradiction dans une +scène sociale suffisamment consistante ne cesse pas pour autant +d'exister ; cela se déplace vers des espaces où la visibilité elle-même +devient l'enjeu du conflit. Les situations apparaissent, disparaissent, +reviennent, se trouvent amplifiées, recadrées, disqualifiées, relancées, +sans toujours parvenir à prendre la forme stable d'un différend. -Le problème n’est pas que les sociétés produisent des inégalités. Il est qu’elles peuvent en venir à ne plus se donner les moyens de les entendre comme tensions. Et lorsque cette capacité s’altère, les conflits ne disparaissent pas ; ils changent de forme. Ce qui ne peut plus se soutenir comme différend dans une scène sociale suffisamment consistante doit encore apparaître quelque part — mais autrement. +Le problème n'est pas que les sociétés produisent des inégalités. Il est +qu'elles peuvent en venir à ne plus se donner les moyens de les entendre +comme tensions. Et lorsque cette capacité s'altère, les conflits ne +disparaissent pas ; ils changent de forme. Ce qui ne peut plus se +soutenir comme différend dans une scène sociale suffisamment consistante +doit encore apparaître quelque part — mais autrement. -La réarchicration sociale suppose alors des conditions précises : des scènes où les situations puissent être formulées autrement que comme écarts à une norme ; des tiers capables de répondre et d’engager leur responsabilité, au-delà de la simple transmission d’informations ; du temps pour reformuler, pour contester, pour reprendre — et non seulement pour traiter ; une révisabilité effective des critères, sans laquelle aucune décision ne peut devenir pleinement opposable ; enfin, une capacité de mise en récit sans laquelle aucune expérience ne devient partageable. Ces conditions ne suppriment pas les tensions ; elles empêchent leur fermeture complète. +La réarchicration sociale suppose alors des conditions précises : des +scènes où les situations puissent être formulées autrement que comme +écarts à une norme ; des tiers capables de répondre et d'engager leur +responsabilité, au-delà de la simple transmission d'informations ; du +temps pour reformuler, pour contester, pour reprendre — et non +seulement pour traiter ; une révisabilité effective des critères, sans +laquelle aucune décision ne peut devenir pleinement opposable ; enfin, +une capacité de mise en récit sans laquelle aucune expérience ne devient +partageable. Ces conditions ne suppriment pas les tensions ; elles +empêchent leur fermeture complète. -À ce point, la question sociale ne se prolonge plus simplement vers le médiatique ; elle s’y reconfigure. Car lorsque la scène se défait, le conflit ne se tait pas : il se déplace vers la lutte pour apparaître. +À ce point, la question sociale ne se prolonge plus simplement vers le +médiatique ; elle s'y reconfigure. Car lorsque la scène se défait, le +conflit ne se tait pas : il se déplace vers la lutte pour apparaître. ## **5.4 — Tensions médiatiques : apparition, circulation, tenue** -La séquence dure dix-neuf secondes. On y voit d’abord un homme tourner brusquement la tête, lever le bras, puis prononcer une phrase dont on n’entend que la fin. Le son est mauvais. Une voix extérieure couvre les premiers mots. Au fond, quelqu’un rit. Rien, dans ces quelques secondes, ne suffit encore à décider ce qui s’est passé. Et pourtant, presque immédiatement, la décision de sens commence. +La séquence dure dix-neuf secondes. On y voit d'abord un homme tourner +brusquement la tête, lever le bras, puis prononcer une phrase dont on +n'entend que la fin. Le son est mauvais. Une voix extérieure couvre les +premiers mots. Au fond, quelqu'un rit. Rien, dans ces quelques secondes, +ne suffit encore à décider ce qui s'est passé. Et pourtant, presque +immédiatement, la décision de sens commence. -La vidéo apparaît d’abord sur un compte local, sans titre véritable, avec une légende neutre. Une heure plus tard, elle circule ailleurs, recadrée et sous-titrée. Le rire a disparu. Le silence qui suivait le geste a été coupé. La phrase incomplète reçoit une transcription plus tranchée que l’audio ne l’autorisait. Deux comptes influents la reprennent. L’un y voit une intimidation. L’autre, une riposte. Un troisième isole seulement le geste, sans le son. Au bout de quelques heures, des milliers de commentaires s’agrègent à des versions qui ne coïncident déjà plus. Ce qui se diffuse n’est pas le même fragment vu par davantage de gens. Ce sont plusieurs objets médiatiques distincts, issus d’un même noyau, mais déjà séparés par leurs découpages, leurs titres, leurs sous-titres, leurs cadres d’énonciation. +La vidéo apparaît d'abord sur un compte local, sans titre véritable, +avec une légende neutre. Une heure plus tard, elle circule ailleurs, +recadrée et sous-titrée. Le rire a disparu. Le silence qui suivait le +geste a été coupé. La phrase incomplète reçoit une transcription plus +tranchée que l'audio ne l'autorisait. Deux comptes influents la +reprennent. L'un y voit une intimidation. L'autre, une riposte. Un +troisième isole seulement le geste, sans le son. Au bout de quelques +heures, des milliers de commentaires s'agrègent à des versions qui ne +coïncident déjà plus. Ce qui se diffuse n'est pas le même fragment vu +par davantage de gens. Ce sont plusieurs objets médiatiques distincts, +issus d'un même noyau, mais déjà séparés par leurs découpages, leurs +titres, leurs sous-titres, leurs cadres d'énonciation. -L’homme filmé finit par publier la séquence complète. On y découvre ce qui précédait : une provocation, des échanges tendus, des paroles hors champ qui ne figuraient pas dans les premiers extraits. On y découvre aussi ce qui suivait : un recul, une explication maladroite, une tentative d’apaisement. Mais cette restitution ne suspend rien. Elle entre elle-même dans la circulation. On lui prélève une phrase. On la juxtapose au premier extrait. On l’oppose aux premières interprétations. On la soupçonne d’avoir été montée à son tour. La “version complète” n’annule pas les versions déjà là ; elle devient un matériau supplémentaire dans un espace où rien n’apparaît désormais qu’en étant immédiatement repris, recodé, redécoupé. +L'homme filmé finit par publier la séquence complète. On y découvre ce +qui précédait : une provocation, des échanges tendus, des paroles hors +champ qui ne figuraient pas dans les premiers extraits. On y découvre +aussi ce qui suivait : un recul, une explication maladroite, une +tentative d'apaisement. Mais cette restitution ne suspend rien. Elle +entre elle-même dans la circulation. On lui prélève une phrase. On la +juxtapose au premier extrait. On l'oppose aux premières interprétations. +On la soupçonne d'avoir été montée à son tour. La "version complète" +n'annule pas les versions déjà là ; elle devient un matériau +supplémentaire dans un espace où rien n'apparaît désormais qu'en étant +immédiatement repris, recodé, redécoupé. -Ce qui s’impose alors n’est ni une discussion au sens fort ni un conflit stabilisé, mais une prolifération d’apparitions concurrentes, plus rapides que les conditions qui permettraient de les reprendre comme problème. La scène existe bien, puisqu’il y a exposition, commentaire, prise de position, circulation massive. Mais cette scène ne se donne pas comme un lieu où ce qui apparaît pourrait être tenu, instruit, requalifié dans des formes relativement partageables. La visibilité se produit ; la comparution ne suit pas nécessairement. +Ce qui s'impose alors n'est ni une discussion au sens fort ni un conflit +stabilisé, mais une prolifération d'apparitions concurrentes, plus +rapides que les conditions qui permettraient de les reprendre comme +problème. La scène existe bien, puisqu'il y a exposition, commentaire, +prise de position, circulation massive. Mais cette scène ne se donne pas +comme un lieu où ce qui apparaît pourrait être tenu, instruit, +requalifié dans des formes relativement partageables. La visibilité se +produit ; la comparution ne suit pas nécessairement. -C’est depuis ce point qu’il faut déplacer le regard. Le problème médiatique ne tient pas d’abord à ce qu’une information soit vraie ou fausse, exacte ou trompeuse. Il tient à la manière dont une séquence surgit, est découpée, relancée, amplifiée, puis recouverte avant même d’avoir pu être reprise. Ce qui est en jeu, ce n’est donc pas seulement le rapport aux faits, mais le régime même d’apparition sous lequel quelque chose devient visible sans devenir pour autant contradictoire. +C'est depuis ce point qu'il faut déplacer le regard. Le problème +médiatique ne tient pas d'abord à ce qu'une information soit vraie ou +fausse, exacte ou trompeuse. Il tient à la manière dont une séquence +surgit, est découpée, relancée, amplifiée, puis recouverte avant même +d'avoir pu être reprise. Ce qui est en jeu, ce n'est donc pas seulement +le rapport aux faits, mais le régime même d'apparition sous lequel +quelque chose devient visible sans devenir pour autant contradictoire. -Le régime présent ne se contente pas d’accélérer ; il modifie la consistance même de ce qui paraît. Jadis, l’accès à la visibilité était plus étroit et plus inégal, mais ce qui franchissait le filtre pouvait encore trouver des formes de reprise relativement stables : enquête suivie, réponse publique, controverse prolongée, droit de retour. Aujourd’hui, l’apparition est plus immédiate, mais aussi plus friable : elle surgit plus facilement, et se défait plus vite. +Le régime présent ne se contente pas d'accélérer ; il modifie la +consistance même de ce qui paraît. Jadis, l'accès à la visibilité était +plus étroit et plus inégal, mais ce qui franchissait le filtre pouvait +encore trouver des formes de reprise relativement stables : enquête +suivie, réponse publique, controverse prolongée, droit de retour. +Aujourd'hui, l'apparition est plus immédiate, mais aussi plus friable : +elle surgit plus facilement, et se défait plus vite. -La première tension qui le traverse oppose ainsi apparition et tenue. Tout peut surgir avec une intensité extrême : une vidéo, une phrase, une capture d’écran, un témoignage bref, une image isolée, un chiffre extrait d’un rapport. Mais presque rien ne tient de soi. Ce qui apparaît n’entre pas spontanément dans une durée de reprise ; il doit lutter pour y accéder. Il lui faut des relais, des formats de persistance, des opérations de recomposition, bref des médiations capables de l’arracher au simple état de séquence. À défaut, l’apparition reste une pointe d’intensité sans scène suffisante. Elle affecte, mais elle n’instruit pas. Elle mobilise, mais elle ne transforme pas nécessairement ce qui la reçoit en contradiction soutenable. +La première tension qui le traverse oppose ainsi apparition et tenue. +Tout peut surgir avec une intensité extrême : une vidéo, une phrase, une +capture d'écran, un témoignage bref, une image isolée, un chiffre +extrait d'un rapport. Mais presque rien ne tient de soi. Ce qui apparaît +n'entre pas spontanément dans une durée de reprise ; il doit lutter pour +y accéder. Il lui faut des relais, des formats de persistance, des +opérations de recomposition, bref des médiations capables de l'arracher +au simple état de séquence. À défaut, l'apparition reste une pointe +d'intensité sans scène suffisante. Elle affecte, mais elle n'instruit +pas. Elle mobilise, mais elle ne transforme pas nécessairement ce qui la +reçoit en contradiction soutenable. -Une seconde tension oppose visibilité et reconnaissance. Être vu n’est pas être reconnu. Une situation peut être massivement exposée sans que ceux qu’elle concerne puissent en devenir les sujets recevables. Ils apparaissent, mais dans une forme déjà orientée par des titres, des découpages, des attentes de lecture, des schémas d’émotion, des anticipations de polémique. Leur expérience circule, mais elle leur revient comme une version étrangère. L’exposition peut même produire une dépossession plus radicale que le silence : non plus l’absence de scène, mais la confiscation de la forme sous laquelle quelque chose apparaît. On n’est pas seulement parlé à la place de ; on est visible sous une forme qui ne permet plus de reprendre adéquatement ce qui a été vu. +Une seconde tension oppose visibilité et reconnaissance. Être vu n'est +pas être reconnu. Une situation peut être massivement exposée sans que +ceux qu'elle concerne puissent en devenir les sujets recevables. Ils +apparaissent, mais dans une forme déjà orientée par des titres, des +découpages, des attentes de lecture, des schémas d'émotion, des +anticipations de polémique. Leur expérience circule, mais elle leur +revient comme une version étrangère. L'exposition peut même produire une +dépossession plus radicale que le silence : non plus l'absence de scène, +mais la confiscation de la forme sous laquelle quelque chose apparaît. +On n'est pas seulement parlé à la place de ; on est visible sous une +forme qui ne permet plus de reprendre adéquatement ce qui a été vu. -S’y ajoute une tension décisive entre symbolisation et saturation. Le médiatique rend possible l’intelligibilité de ce qui survient en le condensant sous des signes partageables : titres, cadrages, récits brefs, oppositions lisibles, catégories immédiatement disponibles. Sans ce travail de symbolisation, rien ne circulerait. Mais cette même opération peut se retourner en saturation. À force de titres, de commentaires, de reformulations, d’images redondantes, ce qui devait devenir intelligible se noie dans l’excès de ses propres signes. Tout est déjà dit avant d’avoir été travaillé. Tout est déjà qualifié avant d’avoir été réellement repris. Ce n’est pas l’absence de récit qui fait alors défaut ; c’est au contraire leur prolifération concurrente, qui empêche qu’un problème tienne suffisamment pour être instruit. +S'y ajoute une tension décisive entre symbolisation et saturation. Le +médiatique rend possible l'intelligibilité de ce qui survient en le +condensant sous des signes partageables : titres, cadrages, récits +brefs, oppositions lisibles, catégories immédiatement disponibles. Sans +ce travail de symbolisation, rien ne circulerait. Mais cette même +opération peut se retourner en saturation. À force de titres, de +commentaires, de reformulations, d'images redondantes, ce qui devait +devenir intelligible se noie dans l'excès de ses propres signes. Tout +est déjà dit avant d'avoir été travaillé. Tout est déjà qualifié avant +d'avoir été réellement repris. Ce n'est pas l'absence de récit qui fait +alors défaut ; c'est au contraire leur prolifération concurrente, qui +empêche qu'un problème tienne suffisamment pour être instruit. -Enfin, le temps de reprise se heurte à l’accélération circulatoire. Ce qui apparaît déclenche presque immédiatement des réactions, des commentaires, des contre-commentaires, des rectifications, des accusations de rectification. L’espace médiatique contemporain n’est pas seulement rapide ; il est organisé pour que la vitesse produise des effets avant même que la reprise soit possible. Or la contradiction exige du différé. Elle suppose qu’on puisse revenir, contextualiser, relier, rouvrir une qualification, déplacer un cadrage. Là où ce différé manque, la circulation ne fait pas que précéder la reprise ; elle en altère les conditions mêmes. Le flux remplace alors la scène au lieu de l’ouvrir. +Enfin, le temps de reprise se heurte à l'accélération circulatoire. Ce +qui apparaît déclenche presque immédiatement des réactions, des +commentaires, des contre-commentaires, des rectifications, des +accusations de rectification. L'espace médiatique contemporain n'est pas +seulement rapide ; il est organisé pour que la vitesse produise des +effets avant même que la reprise soit possible. Or la contradiction +exige du différé. Elle suppose qu'on puisse revenir, contextualiser, +relier, rouvrir une qualification, déplacer un cadrage. Là où ce différé +manque, la circulation ne fait pas que précéder la reprise ; elle en +altère les conditions mêmes. Le flux remplace alors la scène au lieu de +l'ouvrir. -Ces tensions ne s’ajoutent pas mécaniquement les unes aux autres. Elles se reforment mutuellement. Plus une apparition est intense, plus elle doit être rapidement qualifiée ; plus elle est qualifiée vite, plus elle risque d’être saturée par la prolifération de ses versions ; plus cette prolifération s’accélère, moins le temps de reprise subsiste ; et moins ce temps subsiste, plus la visibilité risque de se dissocier de toute reconnaissance véritable. Le médiatique ne peut donc pas être pensé comme simple caisse de résonance du social. Il constitue un régime propre d’apparition, dans lequel les tensions héritées du chapitre se reconfigurent parce que changent les formes mêmes sous lesquelles quelque chose peut être vu, retenu, disputé. +Ces tensions ne s'ajoutent pas mécaniquement les unes aux autres. Elles +se reforment mutuellement. Plus une apparition est intense, plus elle +doit être rapidement qualifiée ; plus elle est qualifiée vite, plus elle +risque d'être saturée par la prolifération de ses versions ; plus cette +prolifération s'accélère, moins le temps de reprise subsiste ; et moins +ce temps subsiste, plus la visibilité risque de se dissocier de toute +reconnaissance véritable. Le médiatique ne peut donc pas être pensé +comme simple caisse de résonance du social. Il constitue un régime +propre d'apparition, dans lequel les tensions héritées du chapitre se +reconfigurent parce que changent les formes mêmes sous lesquelles +quelque chose peut être vu, retenu, disputé. -Une autre scène le montre depuis l’autre bord du régime. Dans une vallée périurbaine, des habitants se plaignent depuis des mois d’odeurs irritantes, de maux de tête récurrents, de dépôts inhabituels sur les volets et les carrosseries. Une association locale accumule des signalements, fait réaliser quelques analyses, compare les dates, relève les vents dominants. Les éléments s’ajoutent peu à peu. Il y a des documents, des courbes, des témoignages, des lettres adressées à la préfecture, quelques réponses évasives, un reportage local diffusé un soir tard. Rien n’est entièrement caché. Rien n’est démenti frontalement. Mais rien ne s’impose non plus. Il n’y a pas d’image décisive, pas de scène courte, pas de geste immédiatement partageable. Le problème existe, mais il ne trouve pas la forme qui lui permettrait de devenir événement médiatique structurant. +Une autre scène le montre depuis l'autre bord du régime. Dans une vallée +périurbaine, des habitants se plaignent depuis des mois d'odeurs +irritantes, de maux de tête récurrents, de dépôts inhabituels sur les +volets et les carrosseries. Une association locale accumule des +signalements, fait réaliser quelques analyses, compare les dates, relève +les vents dominants. Les éléments s'ajoutent peu à peu. Il y a des +documents, des courbes, des témoignages, des lettres adressées à la +préfecture, quelques réponses évasives, un reportage local diffusé un +soir tard. Rien n'est entièrement caché. Rien n'est démenti +frontalement. Mais rien ne s'impose non plus. Il n'y a pas d'image +décisive, pas de scène courte, pas de geste immédiatement partageable. +Le problème existe, mais il ne trouve pas la forme qui lui permettrait +de devenir événement médiatique structurant. -Ici, l’invisibilisation ne prend pas la forme de la censure. Elle prend celle d’une oblitération par faible convertibilité. La situation est réelle, parfois bien documentée, reconnue par ceux qui la vivent et ceux qui la suivent. Pourtant elle ne “prend” pas. D’autres séquences, plus brèves, plus contrastées, plus aisément extractibles, occupent le flux. Le dossier s’épaissit sans acquérir la force d’une apparition capable de structurer des prises de position plus larges. Ce qui manque n’est pas la vérité du problème ; c’est la forme médiatiquement recevable de son surgissement. +Ici, l'invisibilisation ne prend pas la forme de la censure. Elle prend +celle d'une oblitération par faible convertibilité. La situation est +réelle, parfois bien documentée, reconnue par ceux qui la vivent et ceux +qui la suivent. Pourtant elle ne "prend" pas. D'autres séquences, plus +brèves, plus contrastées, plus aisément extractibles, occupent le flux. +Le dossier s'épaissit sans acquérir la force d'une apparition capable de +structurer des prises de position plus larges. Ce qui manque n'est pas +la vérité du problème ; c'est la forme médiatiquement recevable de son +surgissement. -C’est ici que l’arcalité médiatique doit être formulée plus nettement. Elle ne désigne pas seulement un filtre de diffusion ; elle définit un régime de recevabilité des apparitions. Le régime médiatique ne privilégie ni ce qui est le plus important, ni ce qui est le plus juste, ni ce qui est le plus grave. Il favorise d’abord ce qui est saisissable, extractible, condensable, aisément requalifiable, immédiatement identifiable, apte à soutenir la concurrence des autres séquences. Une image courte dispose d’un avantage sur un processus lent. Un conflit aisément simplifiable sur une chaîne causale diffuse. Une émotion lisible sur une expérience ambiguë. Une parole brève, incisive, déjà prête à la reprise, plutôt qu’une parole longue, hésitante, contextuelle, qui exigerait du temps pour être entendue. +C'est ici que l'arcalité médiatique doit être formulée plus nettement. +Elle ne désigne pas seulement un filtre de diffusion ; elle définit un +régime de recevabilité des apparitions. Le régime médiatique ne +privilégie ni ce qui est le plus important, ni ce qui est le plus juste, +ni ce qui est le plus grave. Il favorise d'abord ce qui est saisissable, +extractible, condensable, aisément requalifiable, immédiatement +identifiable, apte à soutenir la concurrence des autres séquences. Une +image courte dispose d'un avantage sur un processus lent. Un conflit +aisément simplifiable sur une chaîne causale diffuse. Une émotion +lisible sur une expérience ambiguë. Une parole brève, incisive, déjà +prête à la reprise, plutôt qu'une parole longue, hésitante, +contextuelle, qui exigerait du temps pour être entendue. -Cette arcalité n’est pas simplement technique. Elle organise aussi une hiérarchie implicite des formes de présence recevables. Certains acteurs disposent des codes, des relais, des médiations nécessaires pour produire des apparitions compatibles avec elle. D’autres non. On parle souvent d’inégalité d’accès à la parole ; mais le problème est plus profond. Il s’agit d’une inégalité d’accès aux formes recevables d’apparition. Ce n’est pas la possibilité abstraite de publier qui manque ; c’est la possibilité de faire tenir ce qu’on publie dans des formats capables de traverser le régime concurrentiel de la visibilité. +Cette arcalité n'est pas simplement technique. Elle organise aussi une +hiérarchie implicite des formes de présence recevables. Certains acteurs +disposent des codes, des relais, des médiations nécessaires pour +produire des apparitions compatibles avec elle. D'autres non. On parle +souvent d'inégalité d'accès à la parole ; mais le problème est plus +profond. Il s'agit d'une inégalité d'accès aux formes recevables +d'apparition. Ce n'est pas la possibilité abstraite de publier qui +manque ; c'est la possibilité de faire tenir ce qu'on publie dans des +formats capables de traverser le régime concurrentiel de la visibilité. -Une parole longue, travaillée, contradictoire, soucieuse de contexte, n’est pas sans valeur. Mais elle est défavorisée dans un espace qui récompense l’extractible. Une expérience lente, diffuse, structurelle, n’est pas invisible par essence. Elle le devient relativement à des circuits d’attention qui privilégient la saillance et la condensation. L’arcalité médiatique ne décide donc pas seulement de ce qui est vu ; elle décide de ce qui est médiatiquement habilité à faire apparition. Ce qui n’entre pas dans ses formats n’est pas annulé. Il reste en deçà du seuil à partir duquel une situation cesse d’être simplement réelle pour devenir scène publique suffisamment tenable. +Une parole longue, travaillée, contradictoire, soucieuse de contexte, +n'est pas sans valeur. Mais elle est défavorisée dans un espace qui +récompense l'extractible. Une expérience lente, diffuse, structurelle, +n'est pas invisible par essence. Elle le devient relativement à des +circuits d'attention qui privilégient la saillance et la condensation. +L'arcalité médiatique ne décide donc pas seulement de ce qui est vu ; +elle décide de ce qui est médiatiquement habilité à faire apparition. Ce +qui n'entre pas dans ses formats n'est pas annulé. Il reste en deçà du +seuil à partir duquel une situation cesse d'être simplement réelle pour +devenir scène publique suffisamment tenable. -C’est à partir de cette arcalité que se déploie la cratialité médiatique proprement dite. Car ce qui apparaît n’est jamais laissé à son seul destin “naturel”. Il est pris dans des opérations concrètes : découpage, montage, titrage, hiérarchisation, répétition, amplification, relégation, recadrage, recirculation, saturation, remplacement. La cratialité médiatique n’est pas un grand sujet caché derrière les écrans ; c’est l’ensemble de ces opérations distribuées qui modifient la trajectoire des apparitions et, par là même, leur capacité à devenir contradiction. +C'est à partir de cette arcalité que se déploie la cratialité médiatique +proprement dite. Car ce qui apparaît n'est jamais laissé à son seul +destin "naturel". Il est pris dans des opérations concrètes : découpage, +montage, titrage, hiérarchisation, répétition, amplification, +relégation, recadrage, recirculation, saturation, remplacement. La +cratialité médiatique n'est pas un grand sujet caché derrière les écrans +; c'est l'ensemble de ces opérations distribuées qui modifient la +trajectoire des apparitions et, par là même, leur capacité à devenir +contradiction. -La scène saturée donne d’abord l’impression d’une victoire : tout semble enfin visible, tout semble enfin impossible à ignorer. Une séquence éclate, envahit les fils, traverse les chaînes d’information, suscite une avalanche de commentaires. On la cite, on la remonte, on la retourne, on l’agrandit. Les mêmes secondes reviennent sous des titres différents, prises dans des récits incompatibles, relancées à mesure qu’elles s’épuisent. +La scène saturée donne d'abord l'impression d'une victoire : tout semble +enfin visible, tout semble enfin impossible à ignorer. Une séquence +éclate, envahit les fils, traverse les chaînes d'information, suscite +une avalanche de commentaires. On la cite, on la remonte, on la +retourne, on l'agrandit. Les mêmes secondes reviennent sous des titres +différents, prises dans des récits incompatibles, relancées à mesure +qu'elles s'épuisent. -On le voit lorsqu’une séquence de violence est reprise des milliers de fois en quelques heures. Le geste est net, l’émotion immédiate, la réaction massive. Très vite, tout le monde parle : témoins, proches, adversaires, soutiens, experts, éditorialistes, comptes militants, comptes ironiques, comptes opportunistes. Chacun ajoute une couche : précision, archive, soupçon, analogie, contre-exemple. Ce qui devait faire tenir un événement produit alors une turbulence où presque rien ne demeure isolable assez longtemps pour être instruit. +On le voit lorsqu'une séquence de violence est reprise des milliers de +fois en quelques heures. Le geste est net, l'émotion immédiate, la +réaction massive. Très vite, tout le monde parle : témoins, proches, +adversaires, soutiens, experts, éditorialistes, comptes militants, +comptes ironiques, comptes opportunistes. Chacun ajoute une couche : +précision, archive, soupçon, analogie, contre-exemple. Ce qui devait +faire tenir un événement produit alors une turbulence où presque rien ne +demeure isolable assez longtemps pour être instruit. -La scène n’est pas absente : elle déborde au point de se neutraliser elle-même. À force de recirculation, la contradiction cesse d’être un différend en voie d’élaboration ; elle devient un champ d’intensités concurrentes où l’enjeu principal n’est plus de reprendre, mais d’occuper, de saturer, parfois d’inonder. L’apparition est maximale ; la tenue minimale. +La scène n'est pas absente : elle déborde au point de se neutraliser +elle-même. À force de recirculation, la contradiction cesse d'être un +différend en voie d'élaboration ; elle devient un champ d'intensités +concurrentes où l'enjeu principal n'est plus de reprendre, mais +d'occuper, de saturer, parfois d'inonder. L'apparition est maximale ; la +tenue minimale. -La scène oblitérée obéit à une logique inverse, mais non moins décisive. Ici, rien n’explose. Rien ne se condense en image souveraine. Une situation existe, elle affecte durablement des existences, elle s’accumule en symptômes, en documents, en témoignages, en rapports partiels. Elle est parfois même connue de nombreux acteurs. Mais elle ne franchit jamais tout à fait le seuil qui lui permettrait de devenir apparition médiatique structurante. Elle reste à bas bruit, comme si sa réalité était privée du régime de sa propre venue au jour. +La scène oblitérée obéit à une logique inverse, mais non moins décisive. +Ici, rien n'explose. Rien ne se condense en image souveraine. Une +situation existe, elle affecte durablement des existences, elle +s'accumule en symptômes, en documents, en témoignages, en rapports +partiels. Elle est parfois même connue de nombreux acteurs. Mais elle ne +franchit jamais tout à fait le seuil qui lui permettrait de devenir +apparition médiatique structurante. Elle reste à bas bruit, comme si sa +réalité était privée du régime de sa propre venue au jour. -Il suffit, pour le comprendre, de suivre le destin médiatique de certaines enquêtes sur le long cours. Un collectif documente pendant des mois les fermetures répétées d’un service hospitalier dans une zone rurale. Il y a des tableaux, des entretiens, des lettres ouvertes, des images de couloirs vides, des chiffres de temps de trajet allongés, des cas concrets de pertes de chance. Tout cela existe. Quelques journaux régionaux le relaient, un reportage radiophonique y consacre huit minutes, une députée pose une question écrite. Mais la situation ne “prend” pas. Elle ne rencontre pas la forme d’apparition qui la rendrait concurrentielle dans l’économie générale de l’attention. Il manque la séquence brève, le signe décisif, la condensation visuelle ou narrative capable de convertir cette érosion lente en événement. Le problème n’est ni falsifié ni frontalement nié ; il demeure sous le seuil d’apparition à partir duquel une situation commence à structurer des prises de position plus larges. +Il suffit, pour le comprendre, de suivre le destin médiatique de +certaines enquêtes sur le long cours. Un collectif documente pendant des +mois les fermetures répétées d'un service hospitalier dans une zone +rurale. Il y a des tableaux, des entretiens, des lettres ouvertes, des +images de couloirs vides, des chiffres de temps de trajet allongés, des +cas concrets de pertes de chance. Tout cela existe. Quelques journaux +régionaux le relaient, un reportage radiophonique y consacre huit +minutes, une députée pose une question écrite. Mais la situation ne +"prend" pas. Elle ne rencontre pas la forme d'apparition qui la rendrait +concurrentielle dans l'économie générale de l'attention. Il manque la +séquence brève, le signe décisif, la condensation visuelle ou narrative +capable de convertir cette érosion lente en événement. Le problème n'est +ni falsifié ni frontalement nié ; il demeure sous le seuil d'apparition +à partir duquel une situation commence à structurer des prises de +position plus larges. -L’oblitération n’est pas l’ombre portée d’une interdiction. Elle est la faiblesse structurelle d’une apparition qui ne parvient pas à convertir sa gravité en forme circulante. C’est pourquoi elle ne doit pas être confondue avec la censure. Le régime médiatique contemporain ne supprime pas seulement ; il hiérarchise selon des compatibilités de format. Ce qui se trouve oblitéré n’est pas ce qui n’existe pas, mais ce qui n’accède pas à la puissance de structuration nécessaire pour sortir de la périphérie. La situation demeure réelle, parfois accablante pour ceux qui la vivent, mais elle reste confinée dans des circuits où l’information n’équivaut pas encore à l’apparition. +L'oblitération n'est pas l'ombre portée d'une interdiction. Elle est la +faiblesse structurelle d'une apparition qui ne parvient pas à convertir +sa gravité en forme circulante. C'est pourquoi elle ne doit pas être +confondue avec la censure. Le régime médiatique contemporain ne supprime +pas seulement ; il hiérarchise selon des compatibilités de format. Ce +qui se trouve oblitéré n'est pas ce qui n'existe pas, mais ce qui +n'accède pas à la puissance de structuration nécessaire pour sortir de +la périphérie. La situation demeure réelle, parfois accablante pour ceux +qui la vivent, mais elle reste confinée dans des circuits où +l'information n'équivaut pas encore à l'apparition. -La scène captée se distingue de l’oblitération en ceci qu’elle commence, elle, par apparaître. Quelque chose surgit, attire l’attention, semble ouvrir un problème. Puis très vite, cette apparition est saisie dans un autre cadre de lisibilité. On ne la fait pas disparaître ; on la redéfinit. +La scène captée se distingue de l'oblitération en ceci qu'elle commence, +elle, par apparaître. Quelque chose surgit, attire l'attention, semble +ouvrir un problème. Puis très vite, cette apparition est saisie dans un +autre cadre de lisibilité. On ne la fait pas disparaître ; on la +redéfinit. -Une archive resurgit au moment où un témoignage commence à poser problème. Une photographie de contexte est remise en circulation ; aussitôt, la lecture de la première image se déplace, et un détail secondaire devient décisif. En peu de temps, ce qui ouvrait sur un agencement de responsabilités plus large se trouve rabattu sur un malentendu, puis sur la faute d’un seul, avant de se dissoudre dans une querelle de versions. +Une archive resurgit au moment où un témoignage commence à poser +problème. Une photographie de contexte est remise en circulation ; +aussitôt, la lecture de la première image se déplace, et un détail +secondaire devient décisif. En peu de temps, ce qui ouvrait sur un +agencement de responsabilités plus large se trouve rabattu sur un +malentendu, puis sur la faute d'un seul, avant de se dissoudre dans une +querelle de versions. -La captation n’a pas besoin d’inventer. Elle intervient au moment où une séquence commence à poser problème en révélant des tensions. Pendant quelques heures, tout semble converger : le fragment circule, les commentaires s’accumulent, une interprétation domine. Puis un autre matériau entre dans la chaîne. Une vidéo plus ancienne réapparaît. Une photographie prise sous un autre angle est remise en circulation. Un propos secondaire, jusque-là négligé, est isolé et mis en avant. Très vite, ce n’est plus la même question qui occupe l’attention. +La captation n'a pas besoin d'inventer. Elle intervient au moment où une +séquence commence à poser problème en révélant des tensions. Pendant +quelques heures, tout semble converger : le fragment circule, les +commentaires s'accumulent, une interprétation domine. Puis un autre +matériau entre dans la chaîne. Une vidéo plus ancienne réapparaît. Une +photographie prise sous un autre angle est remise en circulation. Un +propos secondaire, jusque-là négligé, est isolé et mis en avant. Très +vite, ce n'est plus la même question qui occupe l'attention. -Ce déplacement ne supprime pas la scène ; il la recompose. Ce qui paraissait engager une configuration plus large est ramené à une circonstance particulière. Ce qui pouvait ouvrir sur une logique de responsabilité diffuse se trouve recentré sur une erreur individuelle, une maladresse, un contexte mal lu, une version jugée incomplète. Le problème ne disparaît pas ; il change d’échelle et de forme. +Ce déplacement ne supprime pas la scène ; il la recompose. Ce qui +paraissait engager une configuration plus large est ramené à une +circonstance particulière. Ce qui pouvait ouvrir sur une logique de +responsabilité diffuse se trouve recentré sur une erreur individuelle, +une maladresse, un contexte mal lu, une version jugée incomplète. Le +problème ne disparaît pas ; il change d'échelle et de forme. -Là où la saturation noyait la contradiction dans l’excès des reprises, la captation agit plus sélectivement. Elle ne disperse pas ; elle réoriente. Elle laisse subsister le visible, mais elle en modifie le point de gravité. Le regard continue de se fixer sur la séquence, sauf qu’il ne s’y attache plus pour les mêmes raisons. +Là où la saturation noyait la contradiction dans l'excès des reprises, +la captation agit plus sélectivement. Elle ne disperse pas ; elle +réoriente. Elle laisse subsister le visible, mais elle en modifie le +point de gravité. Le regard continue de se fixer sur la séquence, sauf +qu'il ne s'y attache plus pour les mêmes raisons. -C’est en cela que la captation constitue un régime propre. Elle ne retire pas l’apparition du champ médiatique ; elle la détourne vers une autre grille de lecture. Ce qui commençait à faire question collective se trouve reconduit à une explication plus étroite, plus maniable, plus vite établie. La contradiction demeure visible, mais elle ne met plus en cause le même agencement de responsabilité. +C'est en cela que la captation constitue un régime propre. Elle ne +retire pas l'apparition du champ médiatique ; elle la détourne vers une +autre grille de lecture. Ce qui commençait à faire question collective +se trouve reconduit à une explication plus étroite, plus maniable, plus +vite établie. La contradiction demeure visible, mais elle ne met plus en +cause le même agencement de responsabilité. -La scène simulée procède autrement : elle rend la contradiction visible tout en lui retirant la possibilité de se transformer. Ici, le médiatique n’élimine pas le conflit ; il l’exhibe. Il le cadre, l’ordonne, lui assigne un temps, un décor, une alternance, une conclusion implicite. +La scène simulée procède autrement : elle rend la contradiction visible +tout en lui retirant la possibilité de se transformer. Ici, le +médiatique n'élimine pas le conflit ; il l'exhibe. Il le cadre, +l'ordonne, lui assigne un temps, un décor, une alternance, une +conclusion implicite. -Un plateau réunit quatre personnages médiatiques autour d’un sujet qui a surgi la veille. Chacun dispose de moins d’une minute pour poser sa position. Les introductions ont déjà fixé les camps. Les relances privilégient les points de friction les plus immédiatement lisibles. Une nuance paraît ralentir, une contextualisation semble esquiver, une demande de précision fait perdre le rythme. Très vite, les positions se raidissent moins parce que les acteurs seraient incapables de déplacement que parce que le format récompense la netteté instantanée et pénalise le travail de reformulation. +Un plateau réunit quatre personnages médiatiques autour d'un sujet qui a +surgi la veille. Chacun dispose de moins d'une minute pour poser sa +position. Les introductions ont déjà fixé les camps. Les relances +privilégient les points de friction les plus immédiatement lisibles. Une +nuance paraît ralentir, une contextualisation semble esquiver, une +demande de précision fait perdre le rythme. Très vite, les positions se +raidissent moins parce que les acteurs seraient incapables de +déplacement que parce que le format récompense la netteté instantanée et +pénalise le travail de reformulation. -Le débat a bien eu lieu. Les désaccords ont été exhibés, parfois avec violence. Mais rien n’a été suffisamment tenu pour que le différend gagne en intelligibilité. La scène atteste la contradiction ; elle ne l’accueille pas réellement. Elle prouve qu’“on en parle”, et cette preuve tient lieu de traitement. +Le débat a bien eu lieu. Les désaccords ont été exhibés, parfois avec +violence. Mais rien n'a été suffisamment tenu pour que le différend +gagne en intelligibilité. La scène atteste la contradiction ; elle ne +l'accueille pas réellement. Elle prouve qu'"on en parle", et cette +preuve tient lieu de traitement. -La scène faible, enfin, apparaît en marge des intensités dominantes. Elle n’a ni le fracas de la saturation, ni la puissance de recentrage de la captation, ni le lustre du débat simulé. Sa visibilité est moindre, sa circulation plus lente, son audience plus resserrée. Mais elle porte ce que les autres régimes empêchent : une possibilité minimale de tenue. +La scène faible, enfin, apparaît en marge des intensités dominantes. +Elle n'a ni le fracas de la saturation, ni la puissance de recentrage de +la captation, ni le lustre du débat simulé. Sa visibilité est moindre, +sa circulation plus lente, son audience plus resserrée. Mais elle porte +ce que les autres régimes empêchent : une possibilité minimale de tenue. -On le voit lorsqu’une enquête revient, semaine après semaine, sur le même dossier. Les premières images sont reprises, puis contestées ; des documents sont ajoutés ; des témoins reparlent ; des contradictions apparaissent entre les versions initiales et ce que les archives permettent d’établir. Rien de spectaculaire. Pas d’explosion d’attention. Mais, pour une fois, ce qui était parti en fragments recommence à faire série. +On le voit lorsqu'une enquête revient, semaine après semaine, sur le +même dossier. Les premières images sont reprises, puis contestées ; des +documents sont ajoutés ; des témoins reparlent ; des contradictions +apparaissent entre les versions initiales et ce que les archives +permettent d'établir. Rien de spectaculaire. Pas d'explosion +d'attention. Mais, pour une fois, ce qui était parti en fragments +recommence à faire série. -La scène faible ne promet ni l’universalité ni un renversement immédiat des rapports de visibilité. Sa force est ailleurs : permettre qu’une apparition revienne autrement que comme répétition, qu’un cadrage soit repris autrement que comme réflexe polémique, qu’un objet tienne enfin assez longtemps pour devenir contradiction. Sa faiblesse n’est pas pure vertu ; elle indique aussi sa précarité. Mais c’est en elle que le médiatique laisse encore entrevoir autre chose que l’extraction et la dissipation : une forme minimale de persistance. +La scène faible ne promet ni l'universalité ni un renversement immédiat +des rapports de visibilité. Sa force est ailleurs : permettre qu'une +apparition revienne autrement que comme répétition, qu'un cadrage soit +repris autrement que comme réflexe polémique, qu'un objet tienne enfin +assez longtemps pour devenir contradiction. Sa faiblesse n'est pas pure +vertu ; elle indique aussi sa précarité. Mais c'est en elle que le +médiatique laisse encore entrevoir autre chose que l'extraction et la +dissipation : une forme minimale de persistance. -Ces scènes ne valent toutefois pas comme catégories closes. Elles communiquent, se renversent, se contaminent. Une situation d’abord oblitérée peut brusquement entrer en saturation si un fragment plus saisissable surgit. Une scène saturée peut être captée par requalification rapide. Une scène simulée peut produire, malgré elle, des traces reprises ensuite dans une scène faible plus tenace. Une scène faible peut, à certaines conditions, modifier la manière dont une saturation est lue. +Ces scènes ne valent toutefois pas comme catégories closes. Elles +communiquent, se renversent, se contaminent. Une situation d'abord +oblitérée peut brusquement entrer en saturation si un fragment plus +saisissable surgit. Une scène saturée peut être captée par +requalification rapide. Une scène simulée peut produire, malgré elle, +des traces reprises ensuite dans une scène faible plus tenace. Une scène +faible peut, à certaines conditions, modifier la manière dont une +saturation est lue. -Ce qui importe, dès lors, ne se limite pas à identifier des types, mais à suivre les passages d’un régime à l’autre. La typologie des scènes médiatiques n’a de valeur qu’à cette condition : ne pas figer des essences, mais rendre intelligibles des trajectoires. +Ce qui importe, dès lors, ne se limite pas à identifier des types, mais +à suivre les passages d'un régime à l'autre. La typologie des scènes +médiatiques n'a de valeur qu'à cette condition : ne pas figer des +essences, mais rendre intelligibles des trajectoires. -Une apparition ne naît pas saturée ou captée une fois pour toutes. Elle traverse des états. Elle change de seuil de visibilité, de forme de qualification, de capacité de reprise. Elle peut perdre puis regagner en tenue. Elle peut être recodée plusieurs fois. Ce mouvement n’est pas accidentel ; il fait partie intégrante de la cratialité médiatique. Ce qui importe, ce n’est donc pas seulement le type de scène où une situation surgit, mais la manière dont cette scène peut être consolidée, déplacée, fragilisée ou retournée. +Une apparition ne naît pas saturée ou captée une fois pour toutes. Elle +traverse des états. Elle change de seuil de visibilité, de forme de +qualification, de capacité de reprise. Elle peut perdre puis regagner en +tenue. Elle peut être recodée plusieurs fois. Ce mouvement n'est pas +accidentel ; il fait partie intégrante de la cratialité médiatique. Ce +qui importe, ce n'est donc pas seulement le type de scène où une +situation surgit, mais la manière dont cette scène peut être consolidée, +déplacée, fragilisée ou retournée. -C’est pourquoi la typologie n’a de valeur qu’à condition de rester reliée aux tensions structurales qui l’animent. La scène saturée n’est pas seulement “beaucoup de visibilité” ; elle est la forme sous laquelle la visibilité se retourne en saturation et empêche la tenue. La scène oblitérée n’est pas “peu de visibilité” ; elle est la forme sous laquelle une situation réelle demeure sous le seuil de sa convertibilité. La scène captée n’est pas “mauvais cadrage” ; elle est le régime où la qualification est rapidement retirée à ce qui apparaissait. La scène simulée n’est pas “débat imparfait” ; elle est l’exhibition de la contradiction dans un dispositif qui neutralise sa transformation. La scène faible n’est pas “petit média courageux” ; elle est la possibilité minimale d’une reprise dans un espace dominé par l’extraction et la dissipation. +C'est pourquoi la typologie n'a de valeur qu'à condition de rester +reliée aux tensions structurales qui l'animent. La scène saturée n'est +pas seulement "beaucoup de visibilité" ; elle est la forme sous laquelle +la visibilité se retourne en saturation et empêche la tenue. La scène +oblitérée n'est pas "peu de visibilité" ; elle est la forme sous +laquelle une situation réelle demeure sous le seuil de sa +convertibilité. La scène captée n'est pas "mauvais cadrage" ; elle est +le régime où la qualification est rapidement retirée à ce qui +apparaissait. La scène simulée n'est pas "débat imparfait" ; elle est +l'exhibition de la contradiction dans un dispositif qui neutralise sa +transformation. La scène faible n'est pas "petit média courageux" ; elle +est la possibilité minimale d'une reprise dans un espace dominé par +l'extraction et la dissipation. -À mesure que cette typologie se précise, la montée vers l’archicration devient inévitable. Car si le médiatique distribue si inégalement les conditions de l’apparition, de la circulation et de la tenue, le problème ne peut plus se limiter à constater les formes de visibilité. Il faut se demander dans quelles conditions une apparition pourrait être maintenue, recomposée, requalifiée, suffisamment soutenue pour devenir contradiction. L’archicration médiatique ne consistera pas à moraliser les contenus ni à opposer abstraitement une “bonne information” au chaos du flux. Elle devra être gagnée contre les scènes mêmes que nous venons de traverser : contre la saturation qui submerge, contre l’oblitération qui laisse sous le seuil, contre la captation qui retire la qualification, contre la simulation qui exhibe sans transformer, contre la faiblesse même qui peine à se maintenir. +À mesure que cette typologie se précise, la montée vers l'archicration +devient inévitable. Car si le médiatique distribue si inégalement les +conditions de l'apparition, de la circulation et de la tenue, le +problème ne peut plus se limiter à constater les formes de visibilité. +Il faut se demander dans quelles conditions une apparition pourrait être +maintenue, recomposée, requalifiée, suffisamment soutenue pour devenir +contradiction. L'archicration médiatique ne consistera pas à moraliser +les contenus ni à opposer abstraitement une "bonne information" au chaos +du flux. Elle devra être gagnée contre les scènes mêmes que nous venons +de traverser : contre la saturation qui submerge, contre l'oblitération +qui laisse sous le seuil, contre la captation qui retire la +qualification, contre la simulation qui exhibe sans transformer, contre +la faiblesse même qui peine à se maintenir. -À quelles conditions ce qui apparaît peut-il cesser d’être simple séquence pour devenir contradiction tenue ? +À quelles conditions ce qui apparaît peut-il cesser d'être simple +séquence pour devenir contradiction tenue ? -L’archicration médiatique ne commence pas ailleurs. Elle ne relève ni d’une éthique générale de l’information, ni d’un idéal abstrait de transparence. Elle naît de l’impossibilité, désormais visible, de laisser au seul jeu de la circulation le soin de produire des formes de reprise suffisantes. Elle consiste à instituer — fût-ce de manière fragile, partielle, contestée — des conditions sous lesquelles une apparition peut être maintenue, recomposée, requalifiée et effectivement mise en comparution. +L'archicration médiatique ne commence pas ailleurs. Elle ne relève ni +d'une éthique générale de l'information, ni d'un idéal abstrait de +transparence. Elle naît de l'impossibilité, désormais visible, de +laisser au seul jeu de la circulation le soin de produire des formes de +reprise suffisantes. Elle consiste à instituer — fût-ce de manière +fragile, partielle, contestée — des conditions sous lesquelles une +apparition peut être maintenue, recomposée, requalifiée et effectivement +mise en comparution. -Une première exigence est celle d’une persistance minimale. Ce qui apparaît doit pouvoir revenir — non sous la seule forme de la répétition, mais sous celle d’une réouverture. Dans le régime saturé, la répétition accélère l’oubli en le recouvrant ; dans le régime oblitéré, rien ne franchit vraiment le seuil qui permettrait à une séquence de se fixer ; dans le régime capté, la première requalification s’impose trop vite pour laisser place à une contestation ; dans le régime simulé, le format referme presque aussitôt la contradiction qu’il prétend accueillir. Une scène archicratique exige au contraire des formes de retour : archives accessibles, formats de suivi, dispositifs capables de réinscrire une séquence dans une durée où elle puisse être à nouveau travaillée. +Une première exigence est celle d'une persistance minimale. Ce qui +apparaît doit pouvoir revenir — non sous la seule forme de la +répétition, mais sous celle d'une réouverture. Dans le régime saturé, la +répétition accélère l'oubli en le recouvrant ; dans le régime oblitéré, +rien ne franchit vraiment le seuil qui permettrait à une séquence de se +fixer ; dans le régime capté, la première requalification s'impose trop +vite pour laisser place à une contestation ; dans le régime simulé, le +format referme presque aussitôt la contradiction qu'il prétend +accueillir. Une scène archicratique exige au contraire des formes de +retour : archives accessibles, formats de suivi, dispositifs capables de +réinscrire une séquence dans une durée où elle puisse être à nouveau +travaillée. -Encore faut-il que ce retour ne reconduise pas l’éclatement initial. Car ce qui circule dans le médiatique est presque toujours fragmentaire : extrait, image isolée, phrase détachée, donnée sortie de son contexte. Recomposer n’est pas simplement compléter ; c’est refaire tenir ensemble ce que la circulation a séparé. Il faut relier des fragments, restituer des enchaînements, réarticuler des temporalités. Sans ce travail, la persistance ne fait que répéter des morceaux. Avec lui, l’apparition cesse d’être un simple point d’impact et commence à devenir un problème susceptible d’être instruit. +Encore faut-il que ce retour ne reconduise pas l'éclatement initial. Car +ce qui circule dans le médiatique est presque toujours fragmentaire : +extrait, image isolée, phrase détachée, donnée sortie de son contexte. +Recomposer n'est pas simplement compléter ; c'est refaire tenir ensemble +ce que la circulation a séparé. Il faut relier des fragments, restituer +des enchaînements, réarticuler des temporalités. Sans ce travail, la +persistance ne fait que répéter des morceaux. Avec lui, l'apparition +cesse d'être un simple point d'impact et commence à devenir un problème +susceptible d'être instruit. -Vient alors la question de la qualification. Ce qui paraît est presque toujours immédiatement nommé : scandale, bavure, mensonge, manipulation, incident, polémique. Ces qualifications initiales orientent toute la suite. Une archicration médiatique n’a pas pour tâche d’imposer d’emblée la bonne lecture, mais de rendre possible la contestation du premier cadrage. Il faut que d’autres interprétations puissent être éprouvées, que les catégories employées puissent elles-mêmes être discutées, que le sens reste ouvert à la contradiction au lieu d’être confisqué par sa première formulation. +Vient alors la question de la qualification. Ce qui paraît est presque +toujours immédiatement nommé : scandale, bavure, mensonge, manipulation, +incident, polémique. Ces qualifications initiales orientent toute la +suite. Une archicration médiatique n'a pas pour tâche d'imposer d'emblée +la bonne lecture, mais de rendre possible la contestation du premier +cadrage. Il faut que d'autres interprétations puissent être éprouvées, +que les catégories employées puissent elles-mêmes être discutées, que le +sens reste ouvert à la contradiction au lieu d'être confisqué par sa +première formulation. -Rien de cela ne devient opérant sans comparution effective. Il ne s’agit pas d’une simple juxtaposition de positions, comme dans la scène simulée, mais d’une confrontation où les termes du différend peuvent être travaillés. Comparution ne veut pas dire seule présence simultanée. Elle suppose que les positions puissent être interrogées, déplacées, reformulées, mises à l’épreuve d’éléments qui excèdent leur formulation première. Sans cela, la contradiction circule et s’énonce, mais ne se transforme pas. +Rien de cela ne devient opérant sans comparution effective. Il ne s'agit +pas d'une simple juxtaposition de positions, comme dans la scène +simulée, mais d'une confrontation où les termes du différend peuvent +être travaillés. Comparution ne veut pas dire seule présence simultanée. +Elle suppose que les positions puissent être interrogées, déplacées, +reformulées, mises à l'épreuve d'éléments qui excèdent leur formulation +première. Sans cela, la contradiction circule et s'énonce, mais ne se +transforme pas. -Une autre condition, plus discrète mais décisive, concerne la lisibilité des médiations. Découpage, montage, titrage, hiérarchisation : ces opérations ne sont jamais neutres. Elles orientent la manière dont une apparition sera perçue, reprise, discutée. Tant qu’elles demeurent invisibles ou indiscutables, elles échappent elles-mêmes à la contradiction qu’elles rendent pourtant possible ou impossible. Une archicration médiatique n’exige pas l’abolition des médiations ; elle exige qu’elles puissent, au moins partiellement, devenir explicites et contestables. +Une autre condition, plus discrète mais décisive, concerne la lisibilité +des médiations. Découpage, montage, titrage, hiérarchisation : ces +opérations ne sont jamais neutres. Elles orientent la manière dont une +apparition sera perçue, reprise, discutée. Tant qu'elles demeurent +invisibles ou indiscutables, elles échappent elles-mêmes à la +contradiction qu'elles rendent pourtant possible ou impossible. Une +archicration médiatique n'exige pas l'abolition des médiations ; elle +exige qu'elles puissent, au moins partiellement, devenir explicites et +contestables. -Reste enfin le temps de reprise, sans doute la condition la plus fragile. Elle entre de front en tension avec l’accélération circulatoire. Là où le flux impose la succession, l’archicration requiert du différé : du temps pour revenir, recomposer, requalifier, faire comparaître. Ce temps n’a rien d’un luxe. Il constitue la condition minimale d’une contradiction tenue. Lorsqu’il disparaît, l’apparition demeure une intensité sans lendemain, presque aussitôt remplacée par la suivante. +Reste enfin le temps de reprise, sans doute la condition la plus +fragile. Elle entre de front en tension avec l'accélération +circulatoire. Là où le flux impose la succession, l'archicration +requiert du différé : du temps pour revenir, recomposer, requalifier, +faire comparaître. Ce temps n'a rien d'un luxe. Il constitue la +condition minimale d'une contradiction tenue. Lorsqu'il disparaît, +l'apparition demeure une intensité sans lendemain, presque aussitôt +remplacée par la suivante. -Ces conditions ne décrivent pas un idéal extérieur au médiatique. Elles sont déjà à l’œuvre, de manière partielle, inégale, souvent fragile, dans les scènes faibles que l’on a vues apparaître. Une enquête qui suit un dossier dans la durée, un travail de vérification qui revient sur les premières versions, un dispositif qui met en relation des positions autrement que par simple juxtaposition, un format qui accepte de ralentir sans se dissoudre : autant de tentatives, toujours exposées à la marginalisation, mais qui indiquent que le médiatique n’est pas condamné à la seule logique de la circulation. +Ces conditions ne décrivent pas un idéal extérieur au médiatique. Elles +sont déjà à l'œuvre, de manière partielle, inégale, souvent fragile, +dans les scènes faibles que l'on a vues apparaître. Une enquête qui suit +un dossier dans la durée, un travail de vérification qui revient sur les +premières versions, un dispositif qui met en relation des positions +autrement que par simple juxtaposition, un format qui accepte de +ralentir sans se dissoudre : autant de tentatives, toujours exposées à +la marginalisation, mais qui indiquent que le médiatique n'est pas +condamné à la seule logique de la circulation. -Elles montrent aussi que l’inégalité médiatique ne se réduit pas à la visibilité. Elle devient inégalité de tenue. Entre ceux dont les situations peuvent être maintenues, reprises, requalifiées, et ceux dont l’expérience se dissout dans le flux ou demeure sous le seuil de la convertibilité, se creuse un écart qui ne relève plus seulement de l’accès à la parole. Il concerne la possibilité même que cette parole devienne contradiction. +Elles montrent aussi que l'inégalité médiatique ne se réduit pas à la +visibilité. Elle devient inégalité de tenue. Entre ceux dont les +situations peuvent être maintenues, reprises, requalifiées, et ceux dont +l'expérience se dissout dans le flux ou demeure sous le seuil de la +convertibilité, se creuse un écart qui ne relève plus seulement de +l'accès à la parole. Il concerne la possibilité même que cette parole +devienne contradiction. -C’est à ce point que le médiatique rejoint, sans s’y réduire, les tensions déjà rencontrées. Comme dans l’économie, il redistribue des capacités d’existence — non plus sous la forme de revenus ou de solvabilité, mais sous celle de formes d’apparition. Comme dans l’écologie, il confronte des temporalités incompatibles — celle du flux et celle de la reprise. Comme dans le social, il affecte la possibilité de faire comparaître une situation comme litige. Mais il le fait dans un registre spécifique : celui où apparaître devient lui-même un enjeu de lutte, et où cette lutte ne garantit pas encore que ce qui apparaît puisse être tenu. +C'est à ce point que le médiatique rejoint, sans s'y réduire, les +tensions déjà rencontrées. Comme dans l'économie, il redistribue des +capacités d'existence — non plus sous la forme de revenus ou de +solvabilité, mais sous celle de formes d'apparition. Comme dans +l'écologie, il confronte des temporalités incompatibles — celle du +flux et celle de la reprise. Comme dans le social, il affecte la +possibilité de faire comparaître une situation comme litige. Mais il le +fait dans un registre spécifique : celui où apparaître devient lui-même +un enjeu de lutte, et où cette lutte ne garantit pas encore que ce qui +apparaît puisse être tenu. -Ce qui ne peut être tenu ne disparaît pas. Les scènes saturées laissent des fragments non travaillés ; les scènes oblitérées accumulent des réalités sans forme suffisante d’apparition ; les scènes captées déplacent des contradictions sans les résoudre ; les scènes simulées donnent l’impression d’un traitement sans produire de transformation. Même les scènes faibles ne parviennent pas toujours à stabiliser ce qu’elles rouvrent. +Ce qui ne peut être tenu ne disparaît pas. Les scènes saturées laissent +des fragments non travaillés ; les scènes oblitérées accumulent des +réalités sans forme suffisante d'apparition ; les scènes captées +déplacent des contradictions sans les résoudre ; les scènes simulées +donnent l'impression d'un traitement sans produire de transformation. +Même les scènes faibles ne parviennent pas toujours à stabiliser ce +qu'elles rouvrent. -Rien de cela ne s’évanouit dans l’air. Ce que le médiatique ne parvient pas à faire tenir comme contradiction publique persiste autrement : fatigue, confusion, défiance, saturation intérieure. Lorsque apparition, circulation et reprise demeurent disjointes, ce qui n’a pu être élaboré ne s’efface pas ; cela se dépose, s’accumule, pèse. +Rien de cela ne s'évanouit dans l'air. Ce que le médiatique ne parvient +pas à faire tenir comme contradiction publique persiste autrement : +fatigue, confusion, défiance, saturation intérieure. Lorsque apparition, +circulation et reprise demeurent disjointes, ce qui n'a pu être élaboré +ne s'efface pas ; cela se dépose, s'accumule, pèse. -La question n’est plus seulement d’apparaître. Faut-il encore pouvoir porter ce qui n’a pas trouvé sa scène. +La question n'est plus seulement d'apparaître. Faut-il encore pouvoir +porter ce qui n'a pas trouvé sa scène. -C’est dans cette absence que se présente le psychique. +C'est dans cette absence que se présente le psychique. ## **5.5 — Tensions psychiques : attention, subjectivité, individuation** -Il arrive que la plainte n’ait pas encore trouvé ses mots. +Il arrive que la plainte n'ait pas encore trouvé ses mots. -Un sujet entre en consultation. Il dit qu’il est épuisé, qu’il ne dort plus, qu’il ne parvient plus à se concentrer, qu’il se sent débordé sans savoir exactement par quoi. Il parle par fragments. Les phrases restent inachevées, reviennent, se contredisent parfois. Ce qu’il éprouve est là, mais ne tient pas encore dans une forme susceptible d’être reprise comme histoire. +Un sujet entre en consultation. Il dit qu'il est épuisé, qu'il ne dort +plus, qu'il ne parvient plus à se concentrer, qu'il se sent débordé sans +savoir exactement par quoi. Il parle par fragments. Les phrases restent +inachevées, reviennent, se contredisent parfois. Ce qu'il éprouve est +là, mais ne tient pas encore dans une forme susceptible d'être reprise +comme histoire. Mais en face, le dispositif ne peut attendre. -Il faut situer, évaluer et qualifier. Des questions précises sont posées : depuis quand, à quelle fréquence, avec quels effets, quels antécédents, quels risques. Très vite, ce qui arrive sans consistance suffisante est pris dans une grille qui le rend traitable. Un trouble se profile, une orientation devient possible, une réponse s’esquisse. - -Rien, dans cette opération, n’est arbitraire : elle répond à des exigences réelles de protection, d’évaluation et de décision. Mais ce qui arrive y est souvent saisi avant d’avoir pu être élaboré ; l’expérience devient traitable plus vite qu’elle ne devient racontable, et la prise en charge ne coïncide pas toujours avec une véritable mise en forme. - -La même tension se rejoue ailleurs, sous d’autres dispositifs. Un téléphone s’allume. Une notification apparaît. Un message appelle une réponse. Une information inquiète surgit, suivie immédiatement d’une autre, puis d’une image, puis d’une sollicitation personnelle. L’attention passe d’un objet à l’autre sans pouvoir s’arrêter. Quelque chose affecte, appelle une réaction, puis disparaît sous la sollicitation suivante. - -L’enjeu ici est une transformation des conditions dans lesquelles ce qui affecte peut ou non devenir expérience sensible, intégrable et assimilable. L’affect circule, s’exprime, se décharge parfois ; mais il trouve de moins en moins les médiations qui permettraient de le reprendre, de le relier, de le transformer. - -À ce point, le psychique ne peut plus être pensé comme un dedans protégé. Il apparaît plutôt comme le seuil où viennent se déposer, se condenser et parfois se désorganiser des tensions qui n’ont pas trouvé ailleurs les conditions de leur élaboration. Ce qui n’a pu être tenu dans des scènes économiques, sociales ou médiatiques ne disparaît pas ; cela revient autrement, sous forme de charge, de dispersion, d’impossibilité à faire tenir ce qui pourtant affecte. C’est là que se mesure la viabilité d’une expérience : dans sa capacité à devenir autre chose qu’un choc. - -C’est pourquoi il faut rompre avec une fiction persistante : celle d’une intériorité auto-fondée, naturellement capable de se réguler elle-même. Cette figure a une histoire. Elle suppose des apprentissages, des rythmes, des contraintes incorporées, des formes de mise en récit, des dispositifs de parole, des cadres de symbolisation. Ce que l’on nomme “moi” ne précède pas ces médiations ; il en résulte. Là où elles se transforment, le sujet se transforme avec elles. - -Le psychique ne se possède pas ; il se constitue. Il n’est pas donné une fois pour toutes, mais dépend des conditions qui rendent possible le passage de l’affect à une forme partageable. Là où ces conditions se fragilisent, la vie psychique change de régime : elle devient moins un espace d’élaboration qu’un champ d’intensités difficilement liées. La question n’est donc pas seulement de savoir pourquoi les sujets souffrent, mais dans quelles conditions ce qu’ils éprouvent peut encore être transformé. - -Plusieurs tensions irréductibles se cristallisent ici. Aucune ne demeure isolée ; chacune travaille les autres. - -La première tension oppose l’affect à la symbolisation. Une intensité ne devient psychiquement soutenable qu’à la condition d’être transformée en forme — mots, images, souvenirs, récit. Là où cette transformation échoue, l’affect n’est pas aboli : il revient sans s’inscrire dans une histoire, et le psychique tend alors à devenir moins un espace de mémoire qu’un lieu de répétition. - -La deuxième tension oppose l’attention à la captation. L’attention ne désigne pas seulement une faculté cognitive ; elle constitue une condition d’accès à l’expérience. Elle permet de tenir quelque chose assez longtemps pour le travailler. Lorsqu’elle est continuellement sollicitée, relancée, fragmentée, elle ne s’abolit pas : elle devient instable. Elle ne peut plus soutenir ce qui demanderait du temps. L’expérience est traversée, mais rarement habitée. - -La troisième tension oppose le différé à l’immédiateté réactionnelle. Une expérience n’acquiert une forme que si elle peut être reprise après coup. Elle exige un intervalle, une latence, une possibilité de ne pas répondre immédiatement. Là où tout appelle une réaction rapide — dire, répondre, se positionner — ce temps se réduit. L’expression devient plus facile ; l’élaboration plus difficile. Ce qui est dit ne transforme pas nécessairement ce qui est vécu. - -La quatrième tension oppose enfin individuation et désindividuation. Devenir sujet ne consiste pas à affirmer une identité donnée, mais à relier des expériences, à les intégrer dans une continuité relative. Là où ces opérations de liaison se fragilisent, le sujet ne disparaît pas ; il se disperse. Les expériences s’accumulent sans se configurer, les affects se succèdent sans s’intégrer, les récits peinent à se former. - -Ces tensions ne s’additionnent pas. Elles se nouent. Une attention captée fragilise le différé ; un différé absent empêche la symbolisation ; une symbolisation défaillante affaiblit l’individuation ; une individuation fragile rend plus difficile encore le maintien d’une attention disponible. - -Le psychique apparaît alors comme le lieu où ces transformations cessent d’être simplement observables pour devenir vécues. - -Là où une expérience ne peut plus être différée, mise en forme, reprise, elle ne disparaît pas. Elle insiste autrement. Elle revient sous forme de fatigue, de confusion, d’irritabilité, d’angoisse sans objet, de difficulté à se raconter. Non parce qu’il n’y aurait pas d’histoire, mais parce que l’histoire ne parvient plus à se constituer. - -C’est à partir de ces tensions que se laisse définir l’arcalité psychique : l’ensemble des conditions qui rendent possible la tenue d’une expérience, son différé, sa transformation et son inscription dans une continuité. - -Elle désigne les conditions concrètes à partir desquelles ce qui affecte peut être repris au lieu d’être seulement subi : du temps, des liens, des cadres, des rythmes, des lieux de parole où l’épreuve ne soit pas immédiatement jugée, classée ou relancée. Sans ces médiations, l’affect circule, insiste, se répète sans parvenir à prendre forme ; avec elles, il peut commencer à devenir expérience. La cratialité psychique commence précisément lorsque ces médiations se fragilisent : non sous la forme d’un pouvoir spectaculaire, mais à travers des dispositifs qui captent, mesurent, traitent et relancent plus vite qu’ils ne permettent de transformer. - -Un premier théâtre en donne la mesure. Quelqu’un ouvre un flux d’actualités ou un réseau social pour vérifier une information ou répondre à un message précis. En quelques minutes, l’attention a déjà changé plusieurs fois d’objet : un message appelle une réponse, une image produit une émotion brève, une nouvelle inquiétante surgit puis disparaît sous un contenu léger, une controverse, un rappel personnalisé. Le problème ne tient pas seulement à la diversité des contenus, mais à leur enchaînement. Chacun produit un effet, aucun ne demeure assez longtemps pour être réellement travaillé. - -Le sujet lit, réagit, choisit, ferme parfois une application, revient. Mais cette activité ne suffit pas à produire une véritable appropriation. Quelque chose touche, puis glisse ; inquiète, puis se dissipe sans reprise ; amuse, puis laisse une fatigue sans objet précis. La captation attentionnelle ne détruit pas l’attention ; elle la maintient dans un état de disponibilité contrainte où presque rien ne peut être tenu assez longtemps pour devenir matière à élaboration. - -L’attention cesse alors d’être ce par quoi une expérience peut être habitée ; elle devient ce qui permet seulement qu’elle soit traversée. - -Un second théâtre prolonge cette fragilisation : celui de la réaction immédiate. Un message blesse, une remarque irrite, une information indigne, une image émeut. Presque aussitôt, la réponse s’impose : écrire, commenter, protester, corriger, faire savoir que l’on a été touché. Le délai entre l’affect et son expression se réduit au point de devenir presque imperceptible. L’absence de réaction peut alors passer pour du désengagement, du consentement ou du vide ; le sujet se trouve sommé de manifester sa position avant même d’avoir pu l’élaborer. - -Le paradoxe est net : l’expression devient plus accessible, plus continue, plus valorisée, mais elle perd en puissance de transformation. Dire n’est plus nécessairement travailler ; réagir n’est plus nécessairement reprendre. Une parole très rapide peut soulager sur l’instant, tout en laissant derrière elle une impression de vacuité : quelque chose a été dit, mais rien n’a réellement changé dans la manière de porter ce qui a été éprouvé. L’affect s’est déchargé, non transformé. - -Un troisième théâtre rend ce déplacement plus visible encore : celui de la protocolisation du trouble. Les institutions de soin ont besoin de procédures, de catégories et de repères partagés ; elles doivent orienter, hiérarchiser les urgences, éviter les erreurs graves. Mais ce qu’elles reçoivent n’est pas toujours déjà formé de manière à entrer sans perte dans ces cadres. - -La tension apparaît chaque fois qu’une souffrance encore confuse se trouve rapidement convertie en objet opératoire. Une personne décrit une fatigue profonde, des réveils nocturnes, une incapacité à faire face, un sentiment de débordement sans cause nettement assignable. Très vite, le dispositif doit transformer ce matériau en signes plus stables : symptômes dominants, durée, intensité, niveau de risque, hypothèses diagnostiques, réponse thérapeutique. Ce passage a sa rationalité, mais il introduit aussi une coupure : ce qui est saisi comme cas ne coïncide pas nécessairement avec ce qui, pour le sujet, aurait dû devenir récit. - -Le paradoxe est alors le suivant : être reconnu sans être encore configuré. La souffrance devient plus lisible et plus traitable, sans devenir pour autant plus habitable. La cratialité psychique ne nie pas l’épreuve ; elle la stabilise avant qu’elle ait pu pleinement se dire. - -Un quatrième théâtre prolonge cette logique dans le rapport à soi : celui de l’auto-mesure. Applications de sommeil, scores d’humeur, courbes d’activité, indicateurs de performance, tableaux de suivi personnel : le sujet est invité à se lire à travers des données. Cette médiation peut aider ; il serait absurde de la rejeter en bloc. Mais elle introduit une transformation plus subtile. - -Ce qui est mesurable tend à devenir ce qui est psychiquement pertinent. Ce qui ne se laisse pas quantifier — ambiguïté d’un affect, lenteur d’un déplacement intérieur, contradiction d’un récit — passe plus facilement au second plan. L’individu se connaît mieux sous forme de courbe ; il peut se comprendre moins bien sous forme d’histoire. La cohérence se cherche alors dans la régularité des indicateurs plutôt que dans la mise en forme d’un vécu. Le sujet se suit davantage qu’il ne se comprend. - -Un cinquième théâtre ferme provisoirement la série : celui de la saturation émotionnelle. Ici, ce n’est plus d’abord la fragmentation de l’attention ni la rapidité de la réaction qui dominent, mais l’accumulation d’affects trop nombreux pour être soutenus ensemble. Crises politiques, guerres, catastrophes, violences sociales, récits de détresse, témoignages de victimes, scènes d’effondrement écologique ou institutionnel : chacune de ces réalités peut, isolément, appeler une prise en charge psychique et morale. Mais leur répétition continue finit par produire autre chose qu’une conscience plus aiguë du monde. - -Le sujet reste affecté, parfois profondément. Mais à mesure que les sollicitations se multiplient, il devient plus difficile de leur donner une forme durable. L’indignation se fatigue, l’empathie se défend, la disponibilité se rétracte. Non parce qu’une insensibilité pure s’installerait, mais parce que l’économie psychique ne peut soutenir indéfiniment l’exposition à des intensités qui n’ouvrent pas sur des formes de reprise suffisantes. Le retrait devient alors moins un choix moral qu’une opération de survie attentionnelle. - -La saturation émotionnelle montre la cratialité psychique presque à nu : un régime où l’affect devient trop fréquent pour demeurer élaborable. - -Ces théâtres composent un système de renforcement mutuel : la captation attentionnelle prépare la réaction immédiate ; celle-ci affaiblit la symbolisation ; la protocolisation stabilise trop tôt ; l’auto-mesure substitue l’indicateur au récit ; la saturation émotionnelle épuise la reprise. Le psychique devient alors moins un lieu de liaison qu’un espace de circulation, de traitement et de relance. - -C’est dans ce cadre qu’il faut entendre la désindividuation. Elle ne désigne ni disparition du sujet ni chaos spectaculaire, mais la fragilisation des opérations par lesquelles un sujet relie ses affects, ses expériences, ses paroles et ses inscriptions dans le monde. L’individu continue d’agir, de ressentir, de parler ; il peine davantage à faire tenir ensemble ce qu’il traverse. Cette fragilisation se manifeste souvent sous des formes discrètes : fatigue diffuse, sentiment de dispersion, difficulté à se projeter, impression d’être traversé par trop de choses à la fois sans parvenir à les articuler. - -Il serait faux de lire ces phénomènes comme de simples défaillances individuelles. Ils signalent une transformation des conditions mêmes de la subjectivation. La cratialité psychique doit donc être pensée dans sa dimension systémique : elle désigne un régime plus large dans lequel l’immédiateté, la mesure, la réaction, la sollicitation et la saturation tendent à prévaloir sur la mise en forme, le délai, la narration et la reprise. Elle ne supprime pas toute élaboration ; elle la rend plus fragile, plus coûteuse et plus intermittente. - -Et c’est précisément parce qu’elle atteint cette limite que la question de l’archicration psychique devient inévitable. - -Car si le psychique n’est pas un dedans naturel, s’il ne tient qu’à la condition de médiations capables de transformer l’affect en expérience, alors il faut se demander dans quelles scènes, sous quelles formes, avec quels tiers et à quelles conditions cette transformation peut encore avoir lieu. - -La cratialité psychique ne se maintient pas indéfiniment dans l’équilibre apparent de ses opérations. Ce qu’elle capte, accélère, mesure et redistribue finit par rencontrer des seuils au-delà desquels ses propres mécanismes cessent de réguler pour commencer à désorganiser. Non pas sous la forme d’un effondrement spectaculaire, mais à travers des tensions internes qui apparaissent dans les pratiques mêmes où elle s’exerce. - -Dans la captation attentionnelle, l’enchaînement continu des sollicitations produit d’abord une intensification de la présence. Mais à mesure qu’il se prolonge, il tend à produire l’effet inverse de celui qu’il recherche. L’attention, trop fragmentée pour se fixer, devient incapable de hiérarchiser ce qui lui arrive. Tout insiste, mais rien ne s’impose. Ce qui devait maintenir l’engagement finit par produire une fatigue qui n’est pas simplement physique, mais structurale : une difficulté à faire exister quelque chose comme digne d’être tenu. - -Dans la réaction immédiate, le même retournement apparaît. Répondre vite permet de ne pas rester seul avec ce qui affecte. Mais lorsque cette réaction devient quasi automatique, elle perd sa capacité de transformation. Le sujet parle, écrit, répond — et découvre que cela ne modifie pas réellement ce qu’il traverse. - -Dans la protocolisation du trouble, la tension se déplace encore. Les dispositifs cliniques permettent d’éviter l’arbitraire, de structurer l’accueil, de rendre possible une prise en charge. Mais lorsqu’ils s’appliquent à des expériences encore en cours de formation, ils peuvent produire une reconnaissance qui stabilise trop tôt. Le sujet est identifié, orienté, parfois soulagé ; mais une part de ce qui aurait dû devenir histoire reste en suspens. - -Dans l’auto-mesure, la limite apparaît lorsque la quantification cesse d’être un outil parmi d’autres pour devenir le principal mode de rapport à soi. Le sujet peut suivre ses variations avec précision, mais éprouver une difficulté croissante à comprendre ce qui les relie. Les données s’accumulent, les graphiques se précisent ; la mise en récit, elle, ne suit pas nécessairement. - -Dans la saturation émotionnelle, enfin, la limite se manifeste sous la forme d’un retrait qui n’est ni choisi ni revendiqué. L’exposition répétée à des intensités affectives conduit à une forme de désengagement protecteur. Le sujet ne cesse pas de percevoir ; il cesse de répondre. - -Ces phénomènes ne constituent pas un bloc séparé. Ils sont immanents au fonctionnement même du régime. Ce qui capte trop ne retient plus. Ce qui accélère trop n’élabore plus. Ce qui mesure trop n’explique plus. Ce qui expose trop ne rend plus possible la reprise. - -C’est dans ces limites mêmes que s’ouvrent des interstices. On en observe des formes particulièrement éclairantes là où la transformation de l’affect en expérience devient explicitement l’enjeu. - -Le théâtre de l’opprimé, développé par Augusto Boal, offre une première scène de ce type. Une situation vécue — souvent marquée par une asymétrie, une contrainte ou une impuissance — est rejouée sur scène. Mais ce rejouement ne vise pas à produire une représentation fidèle. Il ouvre un espace de transformation. - -Une scène commence. Elle expose une situation bloquée : une interaction où l’un ne parvient pas à répondre, à se défendre, à déplacer ce qui lui arrive. Puis le dispositif s’interrompt. Le spectateur n’est plus seulement spectateur ; il est invité à devenir acteur. Il monte sur scène, remplace un personnage, modifie un geste, tente une autre réponse, explore une possibilité qui n’avait pas été actualisée dans la situation initiale. - -Ce qui se joue ici ne relève ni de la simple expression, ni de la catharsis immédiate. L’affect est déplacé dans une forme qui permet de l’essayer, de le transformer, de le confronter à d’autres possibles. La scène introduit un différé, mais un différé actif : un temps où l’expérience peut être reprise sans être simplement répétée. Elle institue une médiation — le jeu, la fiction réglée — qui rend possible une transformation que l’immédiateté empêchait. - -L’archicration psychique apparaît ici comme la possibilité de rejouer autrement ce qui n’avait pu d’abord être vécu que sous contrainte. - -Une seconde scène, d’une autre nature mais tout aussi décisive, peut être observée dans la psychiatrie démocratique initiée par Franco Basaglia en Italie. Le geste de Basaglia ne consiste pas seulement à critiquer l’institution asilaire ; il transforme les conditions mêmes dans lesquelles le trouble peut apparaître et être travaillé. - -Dans les asiles traditionnels, la parole du patient est souvent disqualifiée d’emblée. Elle est interprétée à partir de catégories préexistantes, inscrite dans un régime où le sujet est avant tout objet de soin. Basaglia introduit un déplacement radical : ouvrir des espaces où la parole des patients, des soignants et des proches peut circuler autrement. - -Dans certaines structures qu’il contribue à transformer, des réunions collectives sont organisées. Les patients y prennent la parole, racontent ce qu’ils vivent, contestent parfois les décisions, interrogent les pratiques. Les soignants ne disparaissent pas ; leur rôle change. Ils ne sont plus seulement ceux qui évaluent et prescrivent, mais aussi ceux qui participent à une scène où différentes positions peuvent se confronter. - -Ce qui est en jeu ici n’est pas une simple libération de la parole. C’est la création d’une scène où le trouble cesse d’être uniquement un objet à traiter pour devenir un élément d’un espace de comparution. Le conflit n’est pas supprimé ; il est rendu travaillable. La parole n’est pas laissée à elle-même ; elle est inscrite dans un cadre où elle peut être reprise, discutée, déplacée. - -Basaglia ne restitue pas une intériorité perdue. Il déplace le lieu même où le trouble peut devenir expérience partagée. - -Une troisième forme, plus discrète mais largement répandue, apparaît dans les groupes de parole structurés. Qu’il s’agisse de dispositifs thérapeutiques, de médiations collectives ou de cercles organisés autour d’une expérience commune, ces espaces reposent sur des conditions précises. - -Une séance commence. Les participants sont présents, mais rien n’est encore dit. Quelqu’un prend la parole, hésite, cherche ses mots. Ce qui est exprimé est fragmentaire, parfois confus. Un tiers — animateur, thérapeute, médiateur — veille au cadre : distribution de la parole, respect des temps, suspension des interruptions. Un autre participant réagit, non pour contredire immédiatement, mais pour reprendre, reformuler, faire écho. - -Peu à peu, quelque chose se forme. Ce qui était isolé commence à être reconnu. Ce qui était indicible devient partiellement dicible. Ce qui était vécu comme pure intensité commence à se transformer en expérience partageable. Le processus n’est ni linéaire ni garanti. Il peut échouer, se bloquer, produire des malentendus. Mais il repose sur une condition décisive : la parole n’est pas immédiatement absorbée dans un circuit de réaction ou de traitement. Elle est tenue, reprise, travaillée. - -Elle peut enfin demeurer assez longtemps pour commencer à se transformer. - -Ces scènes, aussi différentes soient-elles, ont un point commun. Elles ne cherchent pas à supprimer l’affect ni à le contenir définitivement. Elles créent des conditions où il peut être transformé sans être immédiatement dissous ou capté. - -Elles apparaissent là où la cratialité psychique montre ses limites. Là où la réaction ne transforme plus, où la mesure ne suffit plus, où la saturation empêche la reprise, des dispositifs émergent qui réintroduisent du temps, des médiations, des formes. - -Ces interstices ne sont pas extérieurs au monde contemporain. Ils en font partie. Ils sont souvent précaires, marginaux, dépendants de conditions spécifiques. Mais ils indiquent que le régime psychique n’est pas condamné à la seule logique de la captation et de la décharge. - -Ils montrent surtout que la question n’est pas de restaurer une intériorité perdue, ni de ralentir abstraitement le monde, ni de moraliser les pratiques. Elle est de savoir dans quelles scènes une expérience peut encore devenir autre chose qu’une intensité traversée. - -À ce point, le déplacement est clair. Il ne suffit plus de décrire les tensions du psychique ni les opérations qui les reconfigurent. Il faut comprendre ce qui distingue ce régime des autres et pourquoi il constitue un seuil particulier dans l’économie générale du chapitre. - -Car ici, plus encore que dans les scènes économiques, écologiques, sociales ou médiatiques, ce qui est en jeu n’est pas seulement la manière dont une situation apparaît ou se dispute. C’est la possibilité même qu’un sujet puisse se constituer à partir de ce qui lui arrive. - -Le régime psychique se distingue des scènes précédentes moins par son objet — attention, affect, subjectivité — que par la nature de son enjeu. Dans les configurations économiques, écologiques, sociales ou médiatiques, les tensions portent sur des formes de comparution, de distribution, de visibilité ou de conflictualité qui, même lorsqu’elles sont empêchées, demeurent en principe extérieures au sujet. Elles peuvent l’affecter profondément ; elles ne coïncident pas entièrement avec sa capacité à se constituer. - -Dans le régime psychique, cette distinction se brouille. Ce qui est en jeu n’est pas seulement ce qui arrive au sujet, mais la possibilité même qu’il advienne comme sujet de ce qui lui arrive. - -C’est pourquoi les tensions psychiques ne peuvent être pensées comme des tensions parmi d’autres. Elles constituent un seuil. Là où les autres régimes peuvent encore laisser subsister une extériorité relative — un monde auquel on se confronte, même de manière inégale — le psychique engage la capacité de faire exister ce monde en soi sous une forme soutenable. Il ne s’agit plus seulement de pouvoir apparaître, ni même de pouvoir faire apparaître. Il s’agit de pouvoir porter ce qui apparaît. - -Cette spécificité oblige à reformuler la question centrale du chapitre. Dans les sections précédentes, elle pouvait encore se dire ainsi : dans quelles conditions une situation peut-elle devenir contradiction, c’est-à-dire être tenue, reprise, disputée dans un espace de comparution ? Ici, la question se déplace : dans quelles conditions ce qui affecte peut-il devenir expérience pour un sujet, c’est-à-dire être transformé en quelque chose qu’il peut habiter, travailler, relier ? - -Une contradiction peut exister sans être intégrée. Un conflit peut être visible sans être subjectivement élaboré. Une situation peut être connue, commentée, discutée, et pourtant laisser ceux qu’elle affecte dans l’impossibilité de la porter autrement que comme charge. - -Le régime psychique commence là : au point où l’écart entre ce qui arrive et la capacité de le transformer devient lui-même le lieu de la tension. - -C’est en ce sens que la subjectivation doit être comprise, non comme un processus spontané ou naturel, mais comme un dispositif. Non pas un dispositif au sens réducteur d’un mécanisme extérieur, mais au sens fort d’un ensemble de conditions, de médiations, de formes et de pratiques par lesquelles un sujet peut se constituer à partir de ce qui le traverse. - -La subjectivation n’est pas donnée. Elle suppose du temps, des tiers, des formes, des cadres, des possibilités de reprise. Elle dépend de conditions qui ne sont jamais purement individuelles. Elle peut être soutenue, fragilisée, empêchée, réorientée. - -En ce sens, elle relève pleinement d’une analyse archicratique. - -Parce que la subjectivation dépend de conditions, ces conditions peuvent être distribuées, captées, saturées ou réinstituées. L’arcalité psychique désigne le régime où les médiations de transformation demeurent disponibles ; la cratialité psychique, l’ensemble des opérations qui les accélèrent, les captent ou les fragilisent ; l’archicration, enfin, les scènes où cette transformation redevient possible. - -Dans les autres régimes, l’archicration vise à rendre possible la comparution des situations. Dans le régime psychique, elle vise à rendre possible la constitution du sujet lui-même comme capable de porter ce qui le traverse. Elle n’ouvre qu’une possibilité minimale : que ce qui affecte ne reste pas à l’état de charge brute, mais puisse être transformé en expérience. - -Là où cette possibilité disparaît, ce n’est pas seulement une scène qui se ferme. C’est la capacité même de faire monde qui se fragilise. - -Car faire monde ne consiste pas seulement à partager des espaces, des règles ou des représentations. Cela suppose que les expériences puissent être transformées, transmises, articulées, reprises. Cela suppose que les sujets puissent porter ce qui les affecte autrement que comme une accumulation d’intensités. Là où cette transformation devient impossible, le monde ne disparaît pas. Il devient inhabitable. - -C’est pourquoi la crise psychique contemporaine ne peut être réduite à une augmentation des troubles ou à une multiplication des diagnostics. Elle doit être comprise comme une transformation des conditions de la subjectivation elle-même. Les sujets ne souffrent pas seulement davantage ; ils disposent de moins en moins de scènes où cette souffrance peut devenir expérience. - -Ce qui n’a pas trouvé de scène suffisante dans les régimes économiques, sociaux ou médiatiques ne disparaît pas pour autant. Cela revient, mais autrement : non plus comme contradiction publique, mais comme charge diffuse, difficulté à raconter, tension sans scène, fatigue à relier ce qui arrive. Le psychique apparaît alors comme le lieu où se déposent les restes des scènes insuffisantes. Ce dépôt n’est pas neutre : il altère la capacité à différer, à symboliser, à reprendre, à faire tenir une continuité d’existence. - -Mais ce retour contient aussi une possibilité. Ce qui revient n’est pas seulement ce qui n’a pas été traité ; c’est aussi ce qui n’a pas encore trouvé sa forme. L’archicration psychique commence là : dans l’institution de scènes où cette charge peut être reprise autrement, où ce qui restait à l’état brut peut commencer à devenir expérience. Elle exige du temps contre l’urgence, des médiations contre la captation, des formes contre la dispersion, des tiers contre l’isolement, des possibilités de reprise contre la simple répétition. - -Le régime psychique révèle ainsi sa portée archéologique propre : la subjectivation n’est ni un donné naturel ni un effet secondaire des autres régimes, mais un dispositif à part entière, dont la viabilité conditionne celle de tous les autres. Sans sujets capables de transformer leur expérience, aucune scène économique ne tient durablement, aucune conflictualité sociale ne se soutient, aucune visibilité médiatique ne se convertit en contradiction. Le psychique n’est donc pas la dernière couche du chapitre ; il en est le point de bascule, là où tout ce qui précède vient se déposer, et d’où quelque chose peut parfois repartir autrement. +Il faut situer, évaluer et qualifier. Des questions précises sont posées +: depuis quand, à quelle fréquence, avec quels effets, quels +antécédents, quels risques. Très vite, ce qui arrive sans consistance +suffisante est pris dans une grille qui le rend traitable. Un trouble se +profile, une orientation devient possible, une réponse s'esquisse. + +Rien, dans cette opération, n'est arbitraire : elle répond à des +exigences réelles de protection, d'évaluation et de décision. Mais ce +qui arrive y est souvent saisi avant d'avoir pu être élaboré ; +l'expérience devient traitable plus vite qu'elle ne devient racontable, +et la prise en charge ne coïncide pas toujours avec une véritable mise +en forme. + +La même tension se rejoue ailleurs, sous d'autres dispositifs. Un +téléphone s'allume. Une notification apparaît. Un message appelle une +réponse. Une information inquiète surgit, suivie immédiatement d'une +autre, puis d'une image, puis d'une sollicitation personnelle. +L'attention passe d'un objet à l'autre sans pouvoir s'arrêter. Quelque +chose affecte, appelle une réaction, puis disparaît sous la +sollicitation suivante. + +L'enjeu ici est une transformation des conditions dans lesquelles ce qui +affecte peut ou non devenir expérience sensible, intégrable et +assimilable. L'affect circule, s'exprime, se décharge parfois ; mais il +trouve de moins en moins les médiations qui permettraient de le +reprendre, de le relier, de le transformer. + +À ce point, le psychique ne peut plus être pensé comme un dedans +protégé. Il apparaît plutôt comme le seuil où viennent se déposer, se +condenser et parfois se désorganiser des tensions qui n'ont pas trouvé +ailleurs les conditions de leur élaboration. Ce qui n'a pu être tenu +dans des scènes économiques, sociales ou médiatiques ne disparaît pas ; +cela revient autrement, sous forme de charge, de dispersion, +d'impossibilité à faire tenir ce qui pourtant affecte. C'est là que se +mesure la viabilité d'une expérience : dans sa capacité à devenir autre +chose qu'un choc. + +C'est pourquoi il faut rompre avec une fiction persistante : celle d'une +intériorité auto-fondée, naturellement capable de se réguler elle-même. +Cette figure a une histoire. Elle suppose des apprentissages, des +rythmes, des contraintes incorporées, des formes de mise en récit, des +dispositifs de parole, des cadres de symbolisation. Ce que l'on nomme +"moi" ne précède pas ces médiations ; il en résulte. Là où elles se +transforment, le sujet se transforme avec elles. + +Le psychique ne se possède pas ; il se constitue. Il n'est pas donné une +fois pour toutes, mais dépend des conditions qui rendent possible le +passage de l'affect à une forme partageable. Là où ces conditions se +fragilisent, la vie psychique change de régime : elle devient moins un +espace d'élaboration qu'un champ d'intensités difficilement liées. La +question n'est donc pas seulement de savoir pourquoi les sujets +souffrent, mais dans quelles conditions ce qu'ils éprouvent peut encore +être transformé. + +Plusieurs tensions irréductibles se cristallisent ici. Aucune ne demeure +isolée ; chacune travaille les autres. + +La première tension oppose l'affect à la symbolisation. Une intensité ne +devient psychiquement soutenable qu'à la condition d'être transformée en +forme — mots, images, souvenirs, récit. Là où cette transformation +échoue, l'affect n'est pas aboli : il revient sans s'inscrire dans une +histoire, et le psychique tend alors à devenir moins un espace de +mémoire qu'un lieu de répétition. + +La deuxième tension oppose l'attention à la captation. L'attention ne +désigne pas seulement une faculté cognitive ; elle constitue une +condition d'accès à l'expérience. Elle permet de tenir quelque chose +assez longtemps pour le travailler. Lorsqu'elle est continuellement +sollicitée, relancée, fragmentée, elle ne s'abolit pas : elle devient +instable. Elle ne peut plus soutenir ce qui demanderait du temps. +L'expérience est traversée, mais rarement habitée. + +La troisième tension oppose le différé à l'immédiateté réactionnelle. +Une expérience n'acquiert une forme que si elle peut être reprise après +coup. Elle exige un intervalle, une latence, une possibilité de ne pas +répondre immédiatement. Là où tout appelle une réaction rapide — dire, +répondre, se positionner — ce temps se réduit. L'expression devient +plus facile ; l'élaboration plus difficile. Ce qui est dit ne transforme +pas nécessairement ce qui est vécu. + +La quatrième tension oppose enfin individuation et désindividuation. +Devenir sujet ne consiste pas à affirmer une identité donnée, mais à +relier des expériences, à les intégrer dans une continuité relative. Là +où ces opérations de liaison se fragilisent, le sujet ne disparaît pas ; +il se disperse. Les expériences s'accumulent sans se configurer, les +affects se succèdent sans s'intégrer, les récits peinent à se former. + +Ces tensions ne s'additionnent pas. Elles se nouent. Une attention +captée fragilise le différé ; un différé absent empêche la symbolisation +; une symbolisation défaillante affaiblit l'individuation ; une +individuation fragile rend plus difficile encore le maintien d'une +attention disponible. + +Le psychique apparaît alors comme le lieu où ces transformations cessent +d'être simplement observables pour devenir vécues. + +Là où une expérience ne peut plus être différée, mise en forme, reprise, +elle ne disparaît pas. Elle insiste autrement. Elle revient sous forme +de fatigue, de confusion, d'irritabilité, d'angoisse sans objet, de +difficulté à se raconter. Non parce qu'il n'y aurait pas d'histoire, +mais parce que l'histoire ne parvient plus à se constituer. + +C'est à partir de ces tensions que se laisse définir l'arcalité +psychique : l'ensemble des conditions qui rendent possible la tenue +d'une expérience, son différé, sa transformation et son inscription dans +une continuité. + +Elle désigne les conditions concrètes à partir desquelles ce qui affecte +peut être repris au lieu d'être seulement subi : du temps, des liens, +des cadres, des rythmes, des lieux de parole où l'épreuve ne soit pas +immédiatement jugée, classée ou relancée. Sans ces médiations, l'affect +circule, insiste, se répète sans parvenir à prendre forme ; avec elles, +il peut commencer à devenir expérience. La cratialité psychique commence +précisément lorsque ces médiations se fragilisent : non sous la forme +d'un pouvoir spectaculaire, mais à travers des dispositifs qui captent, +mesurent, traitent et relancent plus vite qu'ils ne permettent de +transformer. + +Un premier théâtre en donne la mesure. Quelqu'un ouvre un flux +d'actualités ou un réseau social pour vérifier une information ou +répondre à un message précis. En quelques minutes, l'attention a déjà +changé plusieurs fois d'objet : un message appelle une réponse, une +image produit une émotion brève, une nouvelle inquiétante surgit puis +disparaît sous un contenu léger, une controverse, un rappel +personnalisé. Le problème ne tient pas seulement à la diversité des +contenus, mais à leur enchaînement. Chacun produit un effet, aucun ne +demeure assez longtemps pour être réellement travaillé. + +Le sujet lit, réagit, choisit, ferme parfois une application, revient. +Mais cette activité ne suffit pas à produire une véritable +appropriation. Quelque chose touche, puis glisse ; inquiète, puis se +dissipe sans reprise ; amuse, puis laisse une fatigue sans objet précis. +La captation attentionnelle ne détruit pas l'attention ; elle la +maintient dans un état de disponibilité contrainte où presque rien ne +peut être tenu assez longtemps pour devenir matière à élaboration. + +L'attention cesse alors d'être ce par quoi une expérience peut être +habitée ; elle devient ce qui permet seulement qu'elle soit traversée. + +Un second théâtre prolonge cette fragilisation : celui de la réaction +immédiate. Un message blesse, une remarque irrite, une information +indigne, une image émeut. Presque aussitôt, la réponse s'impose : +écrire, commenter, protester, corriger, faire savoir que l'on a été +touché. Le délai entre l'affect et son expression se réduit au point de +devenir presque imperceptible. L'absence de réaction peut alors passer +pour du désengagement, du consentement ou du vide ; le sujet se trouve +sommé de manifester sa position avant même d'avoir pu l'élaborer. + +Le paradoxe est net : l'expression devient plus accessible, plus +continue, plus valorisée, mais elle perd en puissance de transformation. +Dire n'est plus nécessairement travailler ; réagir n'est plus +nécessairement reprendre. Une parole très rapide peut soulager sur +l'instant, tout en laissant derrière elle une impression de vacuité : +quelque chose a été dit, mais rien n'a réellement changé dans la manière +de porter ce qui a été éprouvé. L'affect s'est déchargé, non transformé. + +Un troisième théâtre rend ce déplacement plus visible encore : celui de +la protocolisation du trouble. Les institutions de soin ont besoin de +procédures, de catégories et de repères partagés ; elles doivent +orienter, hiérarchiser les urgences, éviter les erreurs graves. Mais ce +qu'elles reçoivent n'est pas toujours déjà formé de manière à entrer +sans perte dans ces cadres. + +La tension apparaît chaque fois qu'une souffrance encore confuse se +trouve rapidement convertie en objet opératoire. Une personne décrit une +fatigue profonde, des réveils nocturnes, une incapacité à faire face, un +sentiment de débordement sans cause nettement assignable. Très vite, le +dispositif doit transformer ce matériau en signes plus stables : +symptômes dominants, durée, intensité, niveau de risque, hypothèses +diagnostiques, réponse thérapeutique. Ce passage a sa rationalité, mais +il introduit aussi une coupure : ce qui est saisi comme cas ne coïncide +pas nécessairement avec ce qui, pour le sujet, aurait dû devenir récit. + +Le paradoxe est alors le suivant : être reconnu sans être encore +configuré. La souffrance devient plus lisible et plus traitable, sans +devenir pour autant plus habitable. La cratialité psychique ne nie pas +l'épreuve ; elle la stabilise avant qu'elle ait pu pleinement se dire. + +Un quatrième théâtre prolonge cette logique dans le rapport à soi : +celui de l'auto-mesure. Applications de sommeil, scores d'humeur, +courbes d'activité, indicateurs de performance, tableaux de suivi +personnel : le sujet est invité à se lire à travers des données. Cette +médiation peut aider ; il serait absurde de la rejeter en bloc. Mais +elle introduit une transformation plus subtile. + +Ce qui est mesurable tend à devenir ce qui est psychiquement pertinent. +Ce qui ne se laisse pas quantifier — ambiguïté d'un affect, lenteur +d'un déplacement intérieur, contradiction d'un récit — passe plus +facilement au second plan. L'individu se connaît mieux sous forme de +courbe ; il peut se comprendre moins bien sous forme d'histoire. La +cohérence se cherche alors dans la régularité des indicateurs plutôt que +dans la mise en forme d'un vécu. Le sujet se suit davantage qu'il ne se +comprend. + +Un cinquième théâtre ferme provisoirement la série : celui de la +saturation émotionnelle. Ici, ce n'est plus d'abord la fragmentation de +l'attention ni la rapidité de la réaction qui dominent, mais +l'accumulation d'affects trop nombreux pour être soutenus ensemble. +Crises politiques, guerres, catastrophes, violences sociales, récits de +détresse, témoignages de victimes, scènes d'effondrement écologique ou +institutionnel : chacune de ces réalités peut, isolément, appeler une +prise en charge psychique et morale. Mais leur répétition continue finit +par produire autre chose qu'une conscience plus aiguë du monde. + +Le sujet reste affecté, parfois profondément. Mais à mesure que les +sollicitations se multiplient, il devient plus difficile de leur donner +une forme durable. L'indignation se fatigue, l'empathie se défend, la +disponibilité se rétracte. Non parce qu'une insensibilité pure +s'installerait, mais parce que l'économie psychique ne peut soutenir +indéfiniment l'exposition à des intensités qui n'ouvrent pas sur des +formes de reprise suffisantes. Le retrait devient alors moins un choix +moral qu'une opération de survie attentionnelle. + +La saturation émotionnelle montre la cratialité psychique presque à nu : +un régime où l'affect devient trop fréquent pour demeurer élaborable. + +Ces théâtres composent un système de renforcement mutuel : la captation +attentionnelle prépare la réaction immédiate ; celle-ci affaiblit la +symbolisation ; la protocolisation stabilise trop tôt ; l'auto-mesure +substitue l'indicateur au récit ; la saturation émotionnelle épuise la +reprise. Le psychique devient alors moins un lieu de liaison qu'un +espace de circulation, de traitement et de relance. + +C'est dans ce cadre qu'il faut entendre la désindividuation. Elle ne +désigne ni disparition du sujet ni chaos spectaculaire, mais la +fragilisation des opérations par lesquelles un sujet relie ses affects, +ses expériences, ses paroles et ses inscriptions dans le monde. +L'individu continue d'agir, de ressentir, de parler ; il peine davantage +à faire tenir ensemble ce qu'il traverse. Cette fragilisation se +manifeste souvent sous des formes discrètes : fatigue diffuse, sentiment +de dispersion, difficulté à se projeter, impression d'être traversé par +trop de choses à la fois sans parvenir à les articuler. + +Il serait faux de lire ces phénomènes comme de simples défaillances +individuelles. Ils signalent une transformation des conditions mêmes de +la subjectivation. La cratialité psychique doit donc être pensée dans sa +dimension systémique : elle désigne un régime plus large dans lequel +l'immédiateté, la mesure, la réaction, la sollicitation et la saturation +tendent à prévaloir sur la mise en forme, le délai, la narration et la +reprise. Elle ne supprime pas toute élaboration ; elle la rend plus +fragile, plus coûteuse et plus intermittente. + +Et c'est précisément parce qu'elle atteint cette limite que la question +de l'archicration psychique devient inévitable. + +Car si le psychique n'est pas un dedans naturel, s'il ne tient qu'à la +condition de médiations capables de transformer l'affect en expérience, +alors il faut se demander dans quelles scènes, sous quelles formes, avec +quels tiers et à quelles conditions cette transformation peut encore +avoir lieu. + +La cratialité psychique ne se maintient pas indéfiniment dans +l'équilibre apparent de ses opérations. Ce qu'elle capte, accélère, +mesure et redistribue finit par rencontrer des seuils au-delà desquels +ses propres mécanismes cessent de réguler pour commencer à désorganiser. +Non pas sous la forme d'un effondrement spectaculaire, mais à travers +des tensions internes qui apparaissent dans les pratiques mêmes où elle +s'exerce. + +Dans la captation attentionnelle, l'enchaînement continu des +sollicitations produit d'abord une intensification de la présence. Mais +à mesure qu'il se prolonge, il tend à produire l'effet inverse de celui +qu'il recherche. L'attention, trop fragmentée pour se fixer, devient +incapable de hiérarchiser ce qui lui arrive. Tout insiste, mais rien ne +s'impose. Ce qui devait maintenir l'engagement finit par produire une +fatigue qui n'est pas simplement physique, mais structurale : une +difficulté à faire exister quelque chose comme digne d'être tenu. + +Dans la réaction immédiate, le même retournement apparaît. Répondre vite +permet de ne pas rester seul avec ce qui affecte. Mais lorsque cette +réaction devient quasi automatique, elle perd sa capacité de +transformation. Le sujet parle, écrit, répond — et découvre que cela +ne modifie pas réellement ce qu'il traverse. + +Dans la protocolisation du trouble, la tension se déplace encore. Les +dispositifs cliniques permettent d'éviter l'arbitraire, de structurer +l'accueil, de rendre possible une prise en charge. Mais lorsqu'ils +s'appliquent à des expériences encore en cours de formation, ils peuvent +produire une reconnaissance qui stabilise trop tôt. Le sujet est +identifié, orienté, parfois soulagé ; mais une part de ce qui aurait dû +devenir histoire reste en suspens. + +Dans l'auto-mesure, la limite apparaît lorsque la quantification cesse +d'être un outil parmi d'autres pour devenir le principal mode de rapport +à soi. Le sujet peut suivre ses variations avec précision, mais éprouver +une difficulté croissante à comprendre ce qui les relie. Les données +s'accumulent, les graphiques se précisent ; la mise en récit, elle, ne +suit pas nécessairement. + +Dans la saturation émotionnelle, enfin, la limite se manifeste sous la +forme d'un retrait qui n'est ni choisi ni revendiqué. L'exposition +répétée à des intensités affectives conduit à une forme de désengagement +protecteur. Le sujet ne cesse pas de percevoir ; il cesse de répondre. + +Ces phénomènes ne constituent pas un bloc séparé. Ils sont immanents au +fonctionnement même du régime. Ce qui capte trop ne retient plus. Ce qui +accélère trop n'élabore plus. Ce qui mesure trop n'explique plus. Ce qui +expose trop ne rend plus possible la reprise. + +C'est dans ces limites mêmes que s'ouvrent des interstices. On en +observe des formes particulièrement éclairantes là où la transformation +de l'affect en expérience devient explicitement l'enjeu. + +Le théâtre de l'opprimé, développé par Augusto Boal, offre une première +scène de ce type. Une situation vécue — souvent marquée par une +asymétrie, une contrainte ou une impuissance — est rejouée sur scène. +Mais ce rejouement ne vise pas à produire une représentation fidèle. Il +ouvre un espace de transformation. + +Une scène commence. Elle expose une situation bloquée : une interaction +où l'un ne parvient pas à répondre, à se défendre, à déplacer ce qui lui +arrive. Puis le dispositif s'interrompt. Le spectateur n'est plus +seulement spectateur ; il est invité à devenir acteur. Il monte sur +scène, remplace un personnage, modifie un geste, tente une autre +réponse, explore une possibilité qui n'avait pas été actualisée dans la +situation initiale. + +Ce qui se joue ici ne relève ni de la simple expression, ni de la +catharsis immédiate. L'affect est déplacé dans une forme qui permet de +l'essayer, de le transformer, de le confronter à d'autres possibles. La +scène introduit un différé, mais un différé actif : un temps où +l'expérience peut être reprise sans être simplement répétée. Elle +institue une médiation — le jeu, la fiction réglée — qui rend +possible une transformation que l'immédiateté empêchait. + +L'archicration psychique apparaît ici comme la possibilité de rejouer +autrement ce qui n'avait pu d'abord être vécu que sous contrainte. + +Une seconde scène, d'une autre nature mais tout aussi décisive, peut +être observée dans la psychiatrie démocratique initiée par Franco +Basaglia en Italie. Le geste de Basaglia ne consiste pas seulement à +critiquer l'institution asilaire ; il transforme les conditions mêmes +dans lesquelles le trouble peut apparaître et être travaillé. + +Dans les asiles traditionnels, la parole du patient est souvent +disqualifiée d'emblée. Elle est interprétée à partir de catégories +préexistantes, inscrite dans un régime où le sujet est avant tout objet +de soin. Basaglia introduit un déplacement radical : ouvrir des espaces +où la parole des patients, des soignants et des proches peut circuler +autrement. + +Dans certaines structures qu'il contribue à transformer, des réunions +collectives sont organisées. Les patients y prennent la parole, +racontent ce qu'ils vivent, contestent parfois les décisions, +interrogent les pratiques. Les soignants ne disparaissent pas ; leur +rôle change. Ils ne sont plus seulement ceux qui évaluent et +prescrivent, mais aussi ceux qui participent à une scène où différentes +positions peuvent se confronter. + +Ce qui est en jeu ici n'est pas une simple libération de la parole. +C'est la création d'une scène où le trouble cesse d'être uniquement un +objet à traiter pour devenir un élément d'un espace de comparution. Le +conflit n'est pas supprimé ; il est rendu travaillable. La parole n'est +pas laissée à elle-même ; elle est inscrite dans un cadre où elle peut +être reprise, discutée, déplacée. + +Basaglia ne restitue pas une intériorité perdue. Il déplace le lieu même +où le trouble peut devenir expérience partagée. + +Une troisième forme, plus discrète mais largement répandue, apparaît +dans les groupes de parole structurés. Qu'il s'agisse de dispositifs +thérapeutiques, de médiations collectives ou de cercles organisés autour +d'une expérience commune, ces espaces reposent sur des conditions +précises. + +Une séance commence. Les participants sont présents, mais rien n'est +encore dit. Quelqu'un prend la parole, hésite, cherche ses mots. Ce qui +est exprimé est fragmentaire, parfois confus. Un tiers — animateur, +thérapeute, médiateur — veille au cadre : distribution de la parole, +respect des temps, suspension des interruptions. Un autre participant +réagit, non pour contredire immédiatement, mais pour reprendre, +reformuler, faire écho. + +Peu à peu, quelque chose se forme. Ce qui était isolé commence à être +reconnu. Ce qui était indicible devient partiellement dicible. Ce qui +était vécu comme pure intensité commence à se transformer en expérience +partageable. Le processus n'est ni linéaire ni garanti. Il peut échouer, +se bloquer, produire des malentendus. Mais il repose sur une condition +décisive : la parole n'est pas immédiatement absorbée dans un circuit de +réaction ou de traitement. Elle est tenue, reprise, travaillée. + +Elle peut enfin demeurer assez longtemps pour commencer à se +transformer. + +Ces scènes, aussi différentes soient-elles, ont un point commun. Elles +ne cherchent pas à supprimer l'affect ni à le contenir définitivement. +Elles créent des conditions où il peut être transformé sans être +immédiatement dissous ou capté. + +Elles apparaissent là où la cratialité psychique montre ses limites. Là +où la réaction ne transforme plus, où la mesure ne suffit plus, où la +saturation empêche la reprise, des dispositifs émergent qui +réintroduisent du temps, des médiations, des formes. + +Ces interstices ne sont pas extérieurs au monde contemporain. Ils en +font partie. Ils sont souvent précaires, marginaux, dépendants de +conditions spécifiques. Mais ils indiquent que le régime psychique n'est +pas condamné à la seule logique de la captation et de la décharge. + +Ils montrent surtout que la question n'est pas de restaurer une +intériorité perdue, ni de ralentir abstraitement le monde, ni de +moraliser les pratiques. Elle est de savoir dans quelles scènes une +expérience peut encore devenir autre chose qu'une intensité traversée. + +À ce point, le déplacement est clair. Il ne suffit plus de décrire les +tensions du psychique ni les opérations qui les reconfigurent. Il faut +comprendre ce qui distingue ce régime des autres et pourquoi il +constitue un seuil particulier dans l'économie générale du chapitre. + +Car ici, plus encore que dans les scènes économiques, écologiques, +sociales ou médiatiques, ce qui est en jeu n'est pas seulement la +manière dont une situation apparaît ou se dispute. C'est la possibilité +même qu'un sujet puisse se constituer à partir de ce qui lui arrive. + +Le régime psychique se distingue des scènes précédentes moins par son +objet — attention, affect, subjectivité — que par la nature de son +enjeu. Dans les configurations économiques, écologiques, sociales ou +médiatiques, les tensions portent sur des formes de comparution, de +distribution, de visibilité ou de conflictualité qui, même lorsqu'elles +sont empêchées, demeurent en principe extérieures au sujet. Elles +peuvent l'affecter profondément ; elles ne coïncident pas entièrement +avec sa capacité à se constituer. + +Dans le régime psychique, cette distinction se brouille. Ce qui est en +jeu n'est pas seulement ce qui arrive au sujet, mais la possibilité même +qu'il advienne comme sujet de ce qui lui arrive. + +C'est pourquoi les tensions psychiques ne peuvent être pensées comme des +tensions parmi d'autres. Elles constituent un seuil. Là où les autres +régimes peuvent encore laisser subsister une extériorité relative — un +monde auquel on se confronte, même de manière inégale — le psychique +engage la capacité de faire exister ce monde en soi sous une forme +soutenable. Il ne s'agit plus seulement de pouvoir apparaître, ni même +de pouvoir faire apparaître. Il s'agit de pouvoir porter ce qui +apparaît. + +Cette spécificité oblige à reformuler la question centrale du chapitre. +Dans les sections précédentes, elle pouvait encore se dire ainsi : dans +quelles conditions une situation peut-elle devenir contradiction, +c'est-à-dire être tenue, reprise, disputée dans un espace de comparution +? Ici, la question se déplace : dans quelles conditions ce qui affecte +peut-il devenir expérience pour un sujet, c'est-à-dire être transformé +en quelque chose qu'il peut habiter, travailler, relier ? + +Une contradiction peut exister sans être intégrée. Un conflit peut être +visible sans être subjectivement élaboré. Une situation peut être +connue, commentée, discutée, et pourtant laisser ceux qu'elle affecte +dans l'impossibilité de la porter autrement que comme charge. + +Le régime psychique commence là : au point où l'écart entre ce qui +arrive et la capacité de le transformer devient lui-même le lieu de la +tension. + +C'est en ce sens que la subjectivation doit être comprise, non comme un +processus spontané ou naturel, mais comme un dispositif. Non pas un +dispositif au sens réducteur d'un mécanisme extérieur, mais au sens fort +d'un ensemble de conditions, de médiations, de formes et de pratiques +par lesquelles un sujet peut se constituer à partir de ce qui le +traverse. + +La subjectivation n'est pas donnée. Elle suppose du temps, des tiers, +des formes, des cadres, des possibilités de reprise. Elle dépend de +conditions qui ne sont jamais purement individuelles. Elle peut être +soutenue, fragilisée, empêchée, réorientée. + +En ce sens, elle relève pleinement d'une analyse archicratique. + +Parce que la subjectivation dépend de conditions, ces conditions peuvent +être distribuées, captées, saturées ou réinstituées. L'arcalité +psychique désigne le régime où les médiations de transformation +demeurent disponibles ; la cratialité psychique, l'ensemble des +opérations qui les accélèrent, les captent ou les fragilisent ; +l'archicration, enfin, les scènes où cette transformation redevient +possible. + +Dans les autres régimes, l'archicration vise à rendre possible la +comparution des situations. Dans le régime psychique, elle vise à rendre +possible la constitution du sujet lui-même comme capable de porter ce +qui le traverse. Elle n'ouvre qu'une possibilité minimale : que ce qui +affecte ne reste pas à l'état de charge brute, mais puisse être +transformé en expérience. + +Là où cette possibilité disparaît, ce n'est pas seulement une scène qui +se ferme. C'est la capacité même de faire monde qui se fragilise. + +Car faire monde ne consiste pas seulement à partager des espaces, des +règles ou des représentations. Cela suppose que les expériences puissent +être transformées, transmises, articulées, reprises. Cela suppose que +les sujets puissent porter ce qui les affecte autrement que comme une +accumulation d'intensités. Là où cette transformation devient +impossible, le monde ne disparaît pas. Il devient inhabitable. + +C'est pourquoi la crise psychique contemporaine ne peut être réduite à +une augmentation des troubles ou à une multiplication des diagnostics. +Elle doit être comprise comme une transformation des conditions de la +subjectivation elle-même. Les sujets ne souffrent pas seulement +davantage ; ils disposent de moins en moins de scènes où cette +souffrance peut devenir expérience. + +Ce qui n'a pas trouvé de scène suffisante dans les régimes économiques, +sociaux ou médiatiques ne disparaît pas pour autant. Cela revient, mais +autrement : non plus comme contradiction publique, mais comme charge +diffuse, difficulté à raconter, tension sans scène, fatigue à relier ce +qui arrive. Le psychique apparaît alors comme le lieu où se déposent les +restes des scènes insuffisantes. Ce dépôt n'est pas neutre : il altère +la capacité à différer, à symboliser, à reprendre, à faire tenir une +continuité d'existence. + +Mais ce retour contient aussi une possibilité. Ce qui revient n'est pas +seulement ce qui n'a pas été traité ; c'est aussi ce qui n'a pas encore +trouvé sa forme. L'archicration psychique commence là : dans +l'institution de scènes où cette charge peut être reprise autrement, où +ce qui restait à l'état brut peut commencer à devenir expérience. Elle +exige du temps contre l'urgence, des médiations contre la captation, des +formes contre la dispersion, des tiers contre l'isolement, des +possibilités de reprise contre la simple répétition. + +Le régime psychique révèle ainsi sa portée archéologique propre : la +subjectivation n'est ni un donné naturel ni un effet secondaire des +autres régimes, mais un dispositif à part entière, dont la viabilité +conditionne celle de tous les autres. Sans sujets capables de +transformer leur expérience, aucune scène économique ne tient +durablement, aucune conflictualité sociale ne se soutient, aucune +visibilité médiatique ne se convertit en contradiction. Le psychique +n'est donc pas la dernière couche du chapitre ; il en est le point de +bascule, là où tout ce qui précède vient se déposer, et d'où quelque +chose peut parfois repartir autrement. ## **5.6 — Tensions politiques : légitimation, souveraineté, représentativité** -Une réforme est annoncée. Elle concerne des millions de personnes. Elle modifie la durée du travail, les conditions de départ, les trajectoires de fin de vie, les rythmes familiaux, les seuils de fatigue supportable, les anticipations de ceux qui travaillent encore et l’inquiétude de ceux qui approchent du moment où leur corps devrait pouvoir ralentir. Pendant des semaines, le pays en parle. Les rues se remplissent. Les syndicats défilent. Les chaînes d’information tournent en boucle. Des experts détaillent les chiffres. Le gouvernement invoque la nécessité. L’opposition dénonce un passage en force. Le parlement débat, puis accélère. Des procédures de compression du temps législatif s’enclenchent. Une allocution solennelle rappelle le cap, la responsabilité, la gravité des choix, l’impossibilité de ne rien faire. La réforme entre finalement en vigueur. +Une réforme est annoncée. Elle concerne des millions de personnes. Elle +modifie la durée du travail, les conditions de départ, les trajectoires +de fin de vie, les rythmes familiaux, les seuils de fatigue supportable, +les anticipations de ceux qui travaillent encore et l'inquiétude de ceux +qui approchent du moment où leur corps devrait pouvoir ralentir. Pendant +des semaines, le pays en parle. Les rues se remplissent. Les syndicats +défilent. Les chaînes d'information tournent en boucle. Des experts +détaillent les chiffres. Le gouvernement invoque la nécessité. +L'opposition dénonce un passage en force. Le parlement débat, puis +accélère. Des procédures de compression du temps législatif +s'enclenchent. Une allocution solennelle rappelle le cap, la +responsabilité, la gravité des choix, l'impossibilité de ne rien faire. +La réforme entre finalement en vigueur. -Et pourtant, quelque chose demeure en suspens : la décision a bien eu lieu, elle produit immédiatement ses effets, mais l’on peine à dire où, à quel moment et sous quelle forme elle a réellement comparu comme décision politiquement traversée. Les rues ont parlé sans trancher. Le parlement a parlé sans absorber la conflictualité. Les procédures ont été respectées sans rendre l’épreuve habitable. Ce qui se donne ici à voir n’est donc pas l’absence de politique, mais une décision politiquement active et archicratiquement insuffisante : un conflit massivement vécu, faiblement transduit ; une légitimation invoquée sans avoir assez traversé le dissensus qu’elle prétendait traiter. +Et pourtant, quelque chose demeure en suspens : la décision a bien eu +lieu, elle produit immédiatement ses effets, mais l'on peine à dire où, +à quel moment et sous quelle forme elle a réellement comparu comme +décision politiquement traversée. Les rues ont parlé sans trancher. Le +parlement a parlé sans absorber la conflictualité. Les procédures ont +été respectées sans rendre l'épreuve habitable. Ce qui se donne ici à +voir n'est donc pas l'absence de politique, mais une décision +politiquement active et archicratiquement insuffisante : un conflit +massivement vécu, faiblement transduit ; une légitimation invoquée sans +avoir assez traversé le dissensus qu'elle prétendait traiter. -Il faut partir de ce désajustement. Nos sociétés continuent de décider, et leurs formes politiques demeurent. La crise contemporaine ne se laisse donc pas saisir comme simple fatigue démocratique ou déficit d’autorité. Elle tient plus précisément à l’écart croissant entre les formes instituées de la légitimation et les chaînes effectives où les décisions se préparent, se verrouillent et s’imposent. Les scènes censées accueillir le conflit subsistent, mais elles ne coïncident plus assez avec les lieux réels où celui-ci se trouve cadré. +Il faut partir de ce désajustement. Nos sociétés continuent de décider, +et leurs formes politiques demeurent. La crise contemporaine ne se +laisse donc pas saisir comme simple fatigue démocratique ou déficit +d'autorité. Elle tient plus précisément à l'écart croissant entre les +formes instituées de la légitimation et les chaînes effectives où les +décisions se préparent, se verrouillent et s'imposent. Les scènes +censées accueillir le conflit subsistent, mais elles ne coïncident plus +assez avec les lieux réels où celui-ci se trouve cadré. -C’est pourquoi le politique doit ici être repris à partir de ses micro-théâtres contemporains : les scènes où une société essaie — ou n’essaie plus suffisamment — de rendre ses tensions comparables, disputables, temporalisables, symbolisables et révisables. Le politique n’est alors ni simple appareil gestionnaire, ni centre sacralisé de décision, ni surplomb moral du commun. Il est, plus rigoureusement, la capacité d’une société à instituer des formes où ses conflits peuvent comparaître sans être ni abolis ni abandonnés à leur pure brutalité. Il ne supprime pas le dissensus ; il tente de lui donner des seuils, des rythmes, des scènes et des prises. Il n’est pas l’art d’éradiquer les contradictions, mais celui de les rendre traversables sans que le commun s’y défasse tout entier. +C'est pourquoi le politique doit ici être repris à partir de ses +micro-théâtres contemporains : les scènes où une société essaie — ou +n'essaie plus suffisamment — de rendre ses tensions comparables, +disputables, temporalisables, symbolisables et révisables. Le politique +n'est alors ni simple appareil gestionnaire, ni centre sacralisé de +décision, ni surplomb moral du commun. Il est, plus rigoureusement, la +capacité d'une société à instituer des formes où ses conflits peuvent +comparaître sans être ni abolis ni abandonnés à leur pure brutalité. Il +ne supprime pas le dissensus ; il tente de lui donner des seuils, des +rythmes, des scènes et des prises. Il n'est pas l'art d'éradiquer les +contradictions, mais celui de les rendre traversables sans que le commun +s'y défasse tout entier. -Sous cet angle, le politique ne vaut pas par la pure puissance de trancher, mais par l’articulation instable de trois dimensions qu’il faut distinguer sans les séparer. Une arcalité politique, d’abord : récits de fondation, principes de légitimation, figures du peuple, de la nation, de la sécurité, de l’intérêt général. Une cratialité politique, ensuite : procédures, chaînes administratives, arbitrages hors scène, appareils partisans, séquences de communication, régulations supranationales, dispositifs de police, formats médiatiques et infrastructures d’expertise. Une archicration politique, enfin : l’état réel des scènes où ces deux dimensions peuvent comparaître, être contestées, rejouées, infléchies et révisées. Toute la question est là : quelles scènes restent effectives, lesquelles se sont affaiblies, et lesquelles ne subsistent plus qu’à titre mimé ou capté ? +Sous cet angle, le politique ne vaut pas par la pure puissance de +trancher, mais par l'articulation instable de trois dimensions qu'il +faut distinguer sans les séparer. Une arcalité politique, d'abord : +récits de fondation, principes de légitimation, figures du peuple, de la +nation, de la sécurité, de l'intérêt général. Une cratialité politique, +ensuite : procédures, chaînes administratives, arbitrages hors scène, +appareils partisans, séquences de communication, régulations +supranationales, dispositifs de police, formats médiatiques et +infrastructures d'expertise. Une archicration politique, enfin : l'état +réel des scènes où ces deux dimensions peuvent comparaître, être +contestées, rejouées, infléchies et révisées. Toute la question est là : +quelles scènes restent effectives, lesquelles se sont affaiblies, et +lesquelles ne subsistent plus qu'à titre mimé ou capté ? -La première tension qui traverse cette sphère est celle de la décision et de la légitimation. Une société doit décider. Elle ne peut suspendre indéfiniment les arbitrages sur le travail, les ressources, les frontières, les droits, l’énergie, la sécurité, les temporalités communes, les priorités budgétaires, les formes de solidarité. Mais aucune décision politique n’est habitable si elle ne passe pas par des formes de légitimation partageables, c’est-à-dire par des scènes où l’on puisse non seulement entendre qu’une décision est prise, mais éprouver qu’elle a traversé le dissensus qu’elle affecte. Il faut tenir ensemble deux exigences hétérogènes : trancher, et exposer ce qui, dans le tranché, demeure contestable. Là réside la difficulté constitutive du politique. Une société qui déciderait sans légitimation durable glisserait vers l’arbitraire, la pure gestion ou la violence nue ; une société qui légitimerait sans jamais décider se dissoudrait dans la procédure sans prise. Le politique ne commence ni dans la décision pure ni dans la justification infinie, mais dans leur tension. +La première tension qui traverse cette sphère est celle de la décision +et de la légitimation. Une société doit décider. Elle ne peut suspendre +indéfiniment les arbitrages sur le travail, les ressources, les +frontières, les droits, l'énergie, la sécurité, les temporalités +communes, les priorités budgétaires, les formes de solidarité. Mais +aucune décision politique n'est habitable si elle ne passe pas par des +formes de légitimation partageables, c'est-à-dire par des scènes où l'on +puisse non seulement entendre qu'une décision est prise, mais éprouver +qu'elle a traversé le dissensus qu'elle affecte. Il faut tenir ensemble +deux exigences hétérogènes : trancher, et exposer ce qui, dans le +tranché, demeure contestable. Là réside la difficulté constitutive du +politique. Une société qui déciderait sans légitimation durable +glisserait vers l'arbitraire, la pure gestion ou la violence nue ; une +société qui légitimerait sans jamais décider se dissoudrait dans la +procédure sans prise. Le politique ne commence ni dans la décision pure +ni dans la justification infinie, mais dans leur tension. -Or cette tension tend aujourd’hui à être déformée par un style de gouvernement fondé sur la nécessité, l’urgence, la contrainte externe et la rationalisation technique. Une réforme n’est plus présentée comme choix partiellement tragique entre des mondes possibles, mais comme réponse imposée par les faits. Un arbitrage budgétaire devient simple ajustement responsable à des équilibres supérieurs. Une restriction des droits ou un contournement du temps délibératif se défendent comme coûts regrettables de la sécurité, de la continuité institutionnelle ou de la stabilité économique. Le problème n’est pas ici que les faits n’existent pas. Le problème est qu’ils sont de plus en plus présentés comme clos avant la scène, comme déjà scellés dans des chaînes de nécessité qui soustraient la décision à la traversée symbolique du conflit. La légitimation devient alors discours d’accompagnement de l’inéluctable, et non épreuve du disputable. +Or cette tension tend aujourd'hui à être déformée par un style de +gouvernement fondé sur la nécessité, l'urgence, la contrainte externe et +la rationalisation technique. Une réforme n'est plus présentée comme +choix partiellement tragique entre des mondes possibles, mais comme +réponse imposée par les faits. Un arbitrage budgétaire devient simple +ajustement responsable à des équilibres supérieurs. Une restriction des +droits ou un contournement du temps délibératif se défendent comme coûts +regrettables de la sécurité, de la continuité institutionnelle ou de la +stabilité économique. Le problème n'est pas ici que les faits n'existent +pas. Le problème est qu'ils sont de plus en plus présentés comme clos +avant la scène, comme déjà scellés dans des chaînes de nécessité qui +soustraient la décision à la traversée symbolique du conflit. La +légitimation devient alors discours d'accompagnement de l'inéluctable, +et non épreuve du disputable. -Un premier micro-théâtre politique apparaît ici clairement : la scène parlementaire compressée. Elle demeure une scène, et il serait faux de la traiter comme pur décor. Des acteurs y comparaissent, des textes y sont amendés, des oppositions s’y expriment, des mots s’y affrontent, des procédures y sont invoquées. Mais elle devient archicratiquement faible dès lors que son temps est réduit à une temporalité d’absorption accélérée, que la décision semble déjà prise ailleurs, que les marges d’inflexion deviennent minimes, que la procédure sert surtout à convertir le dissensus en séquence d’acheminement. Ce n’est pas une scène absente ; c’est une scène comprimée : la comparution y subsiste, mais le conflit n’a plus assez de temps pour devenir véritablement matière commune. L’arcalité y est encore forte — institution, loi, procédure, mandat —, la cratialité y est très active — agenda, discipline majoritaire, accélération, cadrage —, mais l’archicration y est appauvrie. On ne saurait donc la tenir ni pour un pur simulacre, ni pour une scène pleinement habitable. Elle est une scène encore réelle dans sa forme, mais trop comprimée pour que la décision y traverse suffisamment ce qu’elle tranche. +Un premier micro-théâtre politique apparaît ici clairement : la scène +parlementaire compressée. Elle demeure une scène, et il serait faux de +la traiter comme pur décor. Des acteurs y comparaissent, des textes y +sont amendés, des oppositions s'y expriment, des mots s'y affrontent, +des procédures y sont invoquées. Mais elle devient archicratiquement +faible dès lors que son temps est réduit à une temporalité d'absorption +accélérée, que la décision semble déjà prise ailleurs, que les marges +d'inflexion deviennent minimes, que la procédure sert surtout à +convertir le dissensus en séquence d'acheminement. Ce n'est pas une +scène absente ; c'est une scène comprimée : la comparution y subsiste, +mais le conflit n'a plus assez de temps pour devenir véritablement +matière commune. L'arcalité y est encore forte — institution, loi, +procédure, mandat —, la cratialité y est très active — agenda, +discipline majoritaire, accélération, cadrage —, mais l'archicration y +est appauvrie. On ne saurait donc la tenir ni pour un pur simulacre, ni +pour une scène pleinement habitable. Elle est une scène encore réelle +dans sa forme, mais trop comprimée pour que la décision y traverse +suffisamment ce qu'elle tranche. -La deuxième tension décisive oppose souveraineté déclarée et dépendances effectives. Les formes symboliques de la souveraineté demeurent. Les gouvernements parlent encore au nom du pays. Les exécutifs se donnent comme centres de responsabilité. Les peuples continuent d’être invoqués. Les élections, les constitutions, les institutions, les emblèmes nationaux, les séquences diplomatiques, les prises de parole présidentielles, les discours de protection et de maîtrise, tout cela maintient un imaginaire de souveraineté. Mais dans le même temps, les décisions réellement opérantes sont de plus en plus enchâssées dans des ensembles de contraintes, de standards et de dépendances qui ne comparaissent jamais avec la même netteté : marchés financiers, normes supranationales, dépendances énergétiques et logistiques, architectures numériques, chaînes de valeur mondialisées, standards techniques, acteurs para-étatiques ou firmes d’infrastructure. La souveraineté ne disparaît pas ; elle se diffracte. Elle continue d’être mise en scène comme si un centre pouvait pleinement décider, alors même que ce centre agit dans une trame de dépendances qu’il ne maîtrise qu’imparfaitement. +La deuxième tension décisive oppose souveraineté déclarée et dépendances +effectives. Les formes symboliques de la souveraineté demeurent. Les +gouvernements parlent encore au nom du pays. Les exécutifs se donnent +comme centres de responsabilité. Les peuples continuent d'être invoqués. +Les élections, les constitutions, les institutions, les emblèmes +nationaux, les séquences diplomatiques, les prises de parole +présidentielles, les discours de protection et de maîtrise, tout cela +maintient un imaginaire de souveraineté. Mais dans le même temps, les +décisions réellement opérantes sont de plus en plus enchâssées dans des +ensembles de contraintes, de standards et de dépendances qui ne +comparaissent jamais avec la même netteté : marchés financiers, normes +supranationales, dépendances énergétiques et logistiques, architectures +numériques, chaînes de valeur mondialisées, standards techniques, +acteurs para-étatiques ou firmes d'infrastructure. La souveraineté ne +disparaît pas ; elle se diffracte. Elle continue d'être mise en scène +comme si un centre pouvait pleinement décider, alors même que ce centre +agit dans une trame de dépendances qu'il ne maîtrise qu'imparfaitement. -Cette diffraction ne se réduit pas à une banalité sur la mondialisation. Elle affecte le cœur même de la scène politique. D’un côté demeurent des institutions qui prétendent incarner le pouvoir commun ; de l’autre, s’imposent des circuits décisionnels ou quasi décisionnels qui n’ont pas à comparaître dans la même économie symbolique : réactions des marchés financiers à une orientation budgétaire, pression des agences de notation, dépendance énergétique, architecture des plateformes, protocoles numériques, régulations supranationales, chaînes de valeur mondialisées, gouvernance algorithmique, dispositifs de sécurité intégrés, standards techniques, acteurs para-étatiques, firmes d’infrastructure, cabinets de conseil, instrumentations statistiques. Ce que l’on appelle crise de souveraineté n’est pas seulement une nostalgie nationale mal ajustée au monde ; c’est l’expérience, beaucoup plus précise, d’une discordance entre les lieux où l’on continue à parler au nom du commun et les lieux où les contraintes réelles du commun se reconfigurent. +Cette diffraction ne se réduit pas à une banalité sur la mondialisation. +Elle affecte le cœur même de la scène politique. D'un côté demeurent des +institutions qui prétendent incarner le pouvoir commun ; de l'autre, +s'imposent des circuits décisionnels ou quasi décisionnels qui n'ont pas +à comparaître dans la même économie symbolique : réactions des marchés +financiers à une orientation budgétaire, pression des agences de +notation, dépendance énergétique, architecture des plateformes, +protocoles numériques, régulations supranationales, chaînes de valeur +mondialisées, gouvernance algorithmique, dispositifs de sécurité +intégrés, standards techniques, acteurs para-étatiques, firmes +d'infrastructure, cabinets de conseil, instrumentations statistiques. Ce +que l'on appelle crise de souveraineté n'est pas seulement une nostalgie +nationale mal ajustée au monde ; c'est l'expérience, beaucoup plus +précise, d'une discordance entre les lieux où l'on continue à parler au +nom du commun et les lieux où les contraintes réelles du commun se +reconfigurent. -C’est ici qu’un deuxième micro-théâtre devient indispensable : la scène souveraine scénographiée. Un chef d’État ou de gouvernement s’adresse au pays. Le ton est grave. Les mots sont pesés. L’unité nationale est invoquée. La décision est assumée au nom de la continuité, de la responsabilité, de la sécurité, de l’avenir. La scène est forte symboliquement : elle condense l’arcalité représentative, elle réactive l’image d’un centre qui répond, qui protège, qui tranche. Mais elle devient archicratiquement trompeuse lorsque les chaînes réelles qui ont contraint, préparé, orienté ou délimité la décision demeurent hors champ. Ce n’est pas une scène de pure fiction : elle produit bien des effets, elle cadre les affects, elle hiérarchise les récits, elle referme parfois un moment de flottement. Mais elle relève souvent d’une souveraineté simulée : non parce que rien n’y est réel, mais parce que la scène donne à voir l’unité d’un centre là où l’effectivité de la décision est déjà dispersée dans des réseaux non comparus. Le problème politique n’est donc pas seulement la perte de souveraineté, mais une souveraineté qui se met encore en scène alors même qu’elle ne parvient plus à rendre visibles les chaînes de sa propre dépendance. +C'est ici qu'un deuxième micro-théâtre devient indispensable : la scène +souveraine scénographiée. Un chef d'État ou de gouvernement s'adresse au +pays. Le ton est grave. Les mots sont pesés. L'unité nationale est +invoquée. La décision est assumée au nom de la continuité, de la +responsabilité, de la sécurité, de l'avenir. La scène est forte +symboliquement : elle condense l'arcalité représentative, elle réactive +l'image d'un centre qui répond, qui protège, qui tranche. Mais elle +devient archicratiquement trompeuse lorsque les chaînes réelles qui ont +contraint, préparé, orienté ou délimité la décision demeurent hors +champ. Ce n'est pas une scène de pure fiction : elle produit bien des +effets, elle cadre les affects, elle hiérarchise les récits, elle +referme parfois un moment de flottement. Mais elle relève souvent d'une +souveraineté simulée : non parce que rien n'y est réel, mais parce que +la scène donne à voir l'unité d'un centre là où l'effectivité de la +décision est déjà dispersée dans des réseaux non comparus. Le problème +politique n'est donc pas seulement la perte de souveraineté, mais une +souveraineté qui se met encore en scène alors même qu'elle ne parvient +plus à rendre visibles les chaînes de sa propre dépendance. -À cet endroit intervient la dimension idéologique, et elle doit être traitée ici non comme thème concurrent, mais comme matière inflammable du politique. L’idéologique ne remplace pas la scène politique ; il en préforme les seuils, les figures recevables, les récits de légitimation, les images du peuple, de l’ennemi, du danger, du mérite, de l’ordre ou de la réparation. Il agit avant même que les conflits ne comparaissent, en proposant des schèmes qui les cadrent, les simplifient, les compactent ou les polarisent. Un gouvernement ne dit pas seulement : nous décidons cela. Il dit souvent : nous sommes le dernier rempart contre le chaos, nous assumons le réel contre l’irresponsabilité, nous protégeons les honnêtes gens contre les excès. Une opposition ne dit pas seulement : nous contestons cela. Elle dit volontiers : nous sommes le vrai peuple contre les élites, nous rendrons au pays ce qu’on lui a volé, nous mettrons fin à la trahison, nous restaurerons la souveraineté perdue. L’idéologique, ici, ne constitue pas un supplément rhétorique ; il devient opérateur de clôture. Il transforme le dissensus en blocs d’évidence, préqualifie les conflits avant la scène, et rend plus difficile leur traversée. +À cet endroit intervient la dimension idéologique, et elle doit être +traitée ici non comme thème concurrent, mais comme matière inflammable +du politique. L'idéologique ne remplace pas la scène politique ; il en +préforme les seuils, les figures recevables, les récits de légitimation, +les images du peuple, de l'ennemi, du danger, du mérite, de l'ordre ou +de la réparation. Il agit avant même que les conflits ne comparaissent, +en proposant des schèmes qui les cadrent, les simplifient, les +compactent ou les polarisent. Un gouvernement ne dit pas seulement : +nous décidons cela. Il dit souvent : nous sommes le dernier rempart +contre le chaos, nous assumons le réel contre l'irresponsabilité, nous +protégeons les honnêtes gens contre les excès. Une opposition ne dit pas +seulement : nous contestons cela. Elle dit volontiers : nous sommes le +vrai peuple contre les élites, nous rendrons au pays ce qu'on lui a +volé, nous mettrons fin à la trahison, nous restaurerons la souveraineté +perdue. L'idéologique, ici, ne constitue pas un supplément rhétorique ; +il devient opérateur de clôture. Il transforme le dissensus en blocs +d'évidence, préqualifie les conflits avant la scène, et rend plus +difficile leur traversée. -Un troisième micro-théâtre doit donc être isolé : la scène représentative captée par récit préfabriqué. Elle peut prendre la forme d’un débat électoral, d’une campagne, d’un affrontement de porte-parole, d’une consultation publique, d’une controverse parlementaire médiatisée. À première vue, tout indique la pluralité. Pourtant, les positions arrivent déjà enveloppées dans des narrations si denses que la scène n’institue plus vraiment le conflit ; elle le redistribue entre blocs déjà clos. Le peuple y est soit moralement homogénéisé, soit électoralement instantané, soit blessé, soit menacé, soit opposé à des abstractions diabolisées. Les expériences, les intérêts, les mémoires et les angoisses n’y comparaissent qu’après avoir été préformatés par des scripts de légitimation antagonistes. Une telle scène n’est pas sans effets politiques ; elle peut même être électoralement performante. Mais archicratiquement, elle est captée : l’idéologique y précède la comparution et redistribue le dissensus entre blocs déjà clos. Le théâtre représentatif ne devient pas vide ; il devient saturé de récits qui empêchent la conflictualité de se reconfigurer au contact même de la scène. +Un troisième micro-théâtre doit donc être isolé : la scène +représentative captée par récit préfabriqué. Elle peut prendre la forme +d'un débat électoral, d'une campagne, d'un affrontement de porte-parole, +d'une consultation publique, d'une controverse parlementaire médiatisée. +À première vue, tout indique la pluralité. Pourtant, les positions +arrivent déjà enveloppées dans des narrations si denses que la scène +n'institue plus vraiment le conflit ; elle le redistribue entre blocs +déjà clos. Le peuple y est soit moralement homogénéisé, soit +électoralement instantané, soit blessé, soit menacé, soit opposé à des +abstractions diabolisées. Les expériences, les intérêts, les mémoires et +les angoisses n'y comparaissent qu'après avoir été préformatés par des +scripts de légitimation antagonistes. Une telle scène n'est pas sans +effets politiques ; elle peut même être électoralement performante. Mais +archicratiquement, elle est captée : l'idéologique y précède la +comparution et redistribue le dissensus entre blocs déjà clos. Le +théâtre représentatif ne devient pas vide ; il devient saturé de récits +qui empêchent la conflictualité de se reconfigurer au contact même de la +scène. -Cette capture idéologique éclaire la crise de la représentativité. Trop souvent, on la traite comme crise de confiance, comme désaffection électorale, comme déclin des partis, comme désintérêt civique. Tout cela existe, mais ne suffit pas. La représentativité se défait plus profondément lorsqu’une scène politique n’est plus capable de faire comparaître autre chose que des positions déjà cadrées, des intérêts déjà découpés, des affects déjà orientés, des identités déjà surpolarisées. Représenter, au sens fort, ne signifie pas seulement parler au nom de ; cela signifie rendre présentes, dans des formes transmissibles et disputables, des tensions qui n’avaient pas encore trouvé leur scène. Lorsque cette transduction ne se produit plus, l’abstention n’est plus qu’un symptôme parmi d’autres. La colère, la désaffiliation, le retrait, le vote de rupture, l’émeute latérale, l’indifférence cynique, la recherche d’un chef, l’obsession de la restauration, la fragmentation des loyautés, tout cela signale qu’une partie des tensions collectives ne trouvent plus de lieu où être politiquement traversées. +Cette capture idéologique éclaire la crise de la représentativité. Trop +souvent, on la traite comme crise de confiance, comme désaffection +électorale, comme déclin des partis, comme désintérêt civique. Tout cela +existe, mais ne suffit pas. La représentativité se défait plus +profondément lorsqu'une scène politique n'est plus capable de faire +comparaître autre chose que des positions déjà cadrées, des intérêts +déjà découpés, des affects déjà orientés, des identités déjà +surpolarisées. Représenter, au sens fort, ne signifie pas seulement +parler au nom de ; cela signifie rendre présentes, dans des formes +transmissibles et disputables, des tensions qui n'avaient pas encore +trouvé leur scène. Lorsque cette transduction ne se produit plus, +l'abstention n'est plus qu'un symptôme parmi d'autres. La colère, la +désaffiliation, le retrait, le vote de rupture, l'émeute latérale, +l'indifférence cynique, la recherche d'un chef, l'obsession de la +restauration, la fragmentation des loyautés, tout cela signale qu'une +partie des tensions collectives ne trouvent plus de lieu où être +politiquement traversées. -Il faut ici éviter deux contresens. Le premier consisterait à idéaliser les formes anciennes du parlementarisme, comme si la scène représentative classique avait toujours accueilli loyalement la conflictualité sociale. C’est faux : elle l’a souvent filtrée, hiérarchisée ou neutralisée. Le second consisterait à célébrer toute sortie hors cadre comme vérité politique immédiate. C’est faux tout autant : une foule, une occupation, une émeute ou un soulèvement font apparaître une cratialité réelle, mais non encore une archicration. Entre la scène fossilisée et le surgissement nu, toute la question est celle des formes capables de ne pas écraser l’un sans sacraliser l’autre. +Il faut ici éviter deux contresens. Le premier consisterait à idéaliser +les formes anciennes du parlementarisme, comme si la scène +représentative classique avait toujours accueilli loyalement la +conflictualité sociale. C'est faux : elle l'a souvent filtrée, +hiérarchisée ou neutralisée. Le second consisterait à célébrer toute +sortie hors cadre comme vérité politique immédiate. C'est faux tout +autant : une foule, une occupation, une émeute ou un soulèvement font +apparaître une cratialité réelle, mais non encore une archicration. +Entre la scène fossilisée et le surgissement nu, toute la question est +celle des formes capables de ne pas écraser l'un sans sacraliser +l'autre. -La politique commence précisément là : dans cette capacité à ne pas abandonner le conflit ni à la pure violence des rapports de force, ni à leur simple administration. Elle est un nœud de co-viabilité, non parce qu’elle absorberait toutes les autres tensions du monde social, mais parce qu’elle concentre le problème de leur comparution commune. Quand le politique s’affaisse, l’économie peut continuer à fonctionner, l’administration à traiter, la technique à gouverner, les médias à circuler, les affects à se condenser ; mais il manque alors le lieu où les tensions entre ces sphères peuvent être rejouées comme matière du commun. Le politique n’est donc pas le centre ontologique de tout ; il est plus précisément le nœud où une société se donne, ou cesse de se donner, les moyens de reprendre ce qui la traverse. +La politique commence précisément là : dans cette capacité à ne pas +abandonner le conflit ni à la pure violence des rapports de force, ni à +leur simple administration. Elle est un nœud de co-viabilité, non parce +qu'elle absorberait toutes les autres tensions du monde social, mais +parce qu'elle concentre le problème de leur comparution commune. Quand +le politique s'affaisse, l'économie peut continuer à fonctionner, +l'administration à traiter, la technique à gouverner, les médias à +circuler, les affects à se condenser ; mais il manque alors le lieu où +les tensions entre ces sphères peuvent être rejouées comme matière du +commun. Le politique n'est donc pas le centre ontologique de tout ; il +est plus précisément le nœud où une société se donne, ou cesse de se +donner, les moyens de reprendre ce qui la traverse. -Pour mesurer cela, il faut regarder de près un quatrième micro-théâtre : la consultation sans prise. Dans de nombreuses configurations contemporaines, des scènes consultatives existent : débats publics, conventions citoyennes, consultations locales, enquêtes, plateformes participatives, réunions de concertation, comités ad hoc. On y voit comparaître des citoyens, des associations, parfois des experts, parfois des élus. La parole y circule. Des récits y apparaissent. Des objections y sont formulées. Mais la plupart du temps, la structure de décision demeure inchangée ; les conditions d’inflexion réelle sont floues ; les points non négociables sont déjà fixés ; la consultation vient légitimer l’écoute plus qu’elle n’institue une capacité de transformation. Nous ne sommes pas ici devant une absence pure de scène, mais devant une archicration simulée ou faible. Simulée, lorsque l’écoute ne sert qu’à ratifier l’ordre déjà clos. Faible, lorsqu’un reste de reprise demeure, mais sans puissance structurante. Il est décisif de distinguer les deux. Car tout l’intérêt d’une lecture archicratique tient justement à sa finesse diacritique : le problème n’est pas de dénoncer indistinctement toute médiation comme mensonge, mais de dire ce qui, dans ces médiations, est encore actif, et ce qui ne l’est plus. +Pour mesurer cela, il faut regarder de près un quatrième micro-théâtre : +la consultation sans prise. Dans de nombreuses configurations +contemporaines, des scènes consultatives existent : débats publics, +conventions citoyennes, consultations locales, enquêtes, plateformes +participatives, réunions de concertation, comités ad hoc. On y voit +comparaître des citoyens, des associations, parfois des experts, parfois +des élus. La parole y circule. Des récits y apparaissent. Des objections +y sont formulées. Mais la plupart du temps, la structure de décision +demeure inchangée ; les conditions d'inflexion réelle sont floues ; les +points non négociables sont déjà fixés ; la consultation vient légitimer +l'écoute plus qu'elle n'institue une capacité de transformation. Nous ne +sommes pas ici devant une absence pure de scène, mais devant une +archicration simulée ou faible. Simulée, lorsque l'écoute ne sert qu'à +ratifier l'ordre déjà clos. Faible, lorsqu'un reste de reprise demeure, +mais sans puissance structurante. Il est décisif de distinguer les deux. +Car tout l'intérêt d'une lecture archicratique tient justement à sa +finesse diacritique : le problème n'est pas de dénoncer indistinctement +toute médiation comme mensonge, mais de dire ce qui, dans ces +médiations, est encore actif, et ce qui ne l'est plus. -Cette précision est décisive, car la critique du politique contemporain se tromperait lourdement si elle ne voyait plus que des scènes mortes, des rituels vides ou des procédures captées. Il existe encore, à bas bruit, des foyers politiques où quelque chose du dissensus continue de comparaître réellement, même sous des formes fragiles, locales, incomplètes, souvent peu spectaculaires. Non pas des modèles purs, encore moins des dehors innocents du pouvoir, mais des lieux où la conflictualité ne se réduit pas entièrement à l’administration, à la communication ou à la ratification d’un cadre déjà clos. +Cette précision est décisive, car la critique du politique contemporain +se tromperait lourdement si elle ne voyait plus que des scènes mortes, +des rituels vides ou des procédures captées. Il existe encore, à bas +bruit, des foyers politiques où quelque chose du dissensus continue de +comparaître réellement, même sous des formes fragiles, locales, +incomplètes, souvent peu spectaculaires. Non pas des modèles purs, +encore moins des dehors innocents du pouvoir, mais des lieux où la +conflictualité ne se réduit pas entièrement à l'administration, à la +communication ou à la ratification d'un cadre déjà clos. -On rencontre de telles formes dans certaines expériences coopératives lorsque les arbitrages sur le travail, la dette, le temps, la rémunération, la finalité de l’activité ou la distribution de la charge ne sont pas simplement absorbés par la gestion interne, mais remis en discussion dans des cadres où ils peuvent effectivement infléchir les règles communes. On en rencontre aussi dans certaines pratiques mutualistes, lorsque la solidarité n’y demeure pas une valeur proclamée, mais devient l’objet d’arbitrages comparables : qui contribue, qui reçoit, à quelles conditions, selon quelle dette sociale reconnue, selon quelle exposition partagée au risque. On en trouve encore dans certaines organisations syndicales, non lorsqu’elles se bornent à négocier la marge d’un cadre déjà fixé, mais lorsqu’elles parviennent à faire apparaître la conflictualité du travail comme matière commune opposable à d’autres acteurs. +On rencontre de telles formes dans certaines expériences coopératives +lorsque les arbitrages sur le travail, la dette, le temps, la +rémunération, la finalité de l'activité ou la distribution de la charge +ne sont pas simplement absorbés par la gestion interne, mais remis en +discussion dans des cadres où ils peuvent effectivement infléchir les +règles communes. On en rencontre aussi dans certaines pratiques +mutualistes, lorsque la solidarité n'y demeure pas une valeur proclamée, +mais devient l'objet d'arbitrages comparables : qui contribue, qui +reçoit, à quelles conditions, selon quelle dette sociale reconnue, selon +quelle exposition partagée au risque. On en trouve encore dans certaines +organisations syndicales, non lorsqu'elles se bornent à négocier la +marge d'un cadre déjà fixé, mais lorsqu'elles parviennent à faire +apparaître la conflictualité du travail comme matière commune opposable +à d'autres acteurs. -Il en va de même de certaines assemblées locales, de certains collectifs territoriaux, de certaines scènes municipales, de certains dispositifs issus de l’économie sociale et solidaire, des sociétés de secours mutuel historiques jusqu’à certaines formes contemporaines de SCOP, de SCIC, de CAE ou de communs territorialisés. Toutes ces expériences ne valent pas parce qu’elles seraient “alternatives” par nature. Elles ne valent politiquement que lorsqu’elles parviennent à faire comparaître ce qu’elles engagent réellement : conflits d’usage, mémoire des lieux, répartition des charges, seuils de contribution, hiérarchies implicites, formes de reconnaissance, différends sur la finalité même de l’action commune. Leur intérêt n’est donc ni moral ni décoratif. Il tient à ceci, plus exigeant : elles peuvent fonctionner comme laboratoires partiels d’archicration politique lorsque les tensions qui les traversent ne sont ni recouvertes par l’identité du groupe, ni neutralisées par la seule gestion, mais redeviennent matière de décision opposable. +Il en va de même de certaines assemblées locales, de certains collectifs +territoriaux, de certaines scènes municipales, de certains dispositifs +issus de l'économie sociale et solidaire, des sociétés de secours mutuel +historiques jusqu'à certaines formes contemporaines de SCOP, de SCIC, de +CAE ou de communs territorialisés. Toutes ces expériences ne valent pas +parce qu'elles seraient "alternatives" par nature. Elles ne valent +politiquement que lorsqu'elles parviennent à faire comparaître ce +qu'elles engagent réellement : conflits d'usage, mémoire des lieux, +répartition des charges, seuils de contribution, hiérarchies implicites, +formes de reconnaissance, différends sur la finalité même de l'action +commune. Leur intérêt n'est donc ni moral ni décoratif. Il tient à ceci, +plus exigeant : elles peuvent fonctionner comme laboratoires partiels +d'archicration politique lorsque les tensions qui les traversent ne sont +ni recouvertes par l'identité du groupe, ni neutralisées par la seule +gestion, mais redeviennent matière de décision opposable. -Il faut donc être rigoureux. Une coopérative n’est pas politiquement intéressante parce qu’elle se dit horizontale. Une mutuelle ne l’est pas parce qu’elle se veut solidaire. Un syndicat ne l’est pas parce qu’il se proclame représentatif. Un parti ne l’est pas parce qu’il agrège des voix. Chacun de ces dispositifs ne devient politiquement vivant qu’à la condition de laisser comparaître les arbitrages qui le travaillent réellement — et d’accepter que ces arbitrages puissent affecter sa propre forme. C’est seulement à ce prix qu’il devient possible de distinguer, à l’intérieur même des formes instituées, les scènes encore actives, les scènes captées, les scènes fossilisées et les scènes véritablement émergentes. +Il faut donc être rigoureux. Une coopérative n'est pas politiquement +intéressante parce qu'elle se dit horizontale. Une mutuelle ne l'est pas +parce qu'elle se veut solidaire. Un syndicat ne l'est pas parce qu'il se +proclame représentatif. Un parti ne l'est pas parce qu'il agrège des +voix. Chacun de ces dispositifs ne devient politiquement vivant qu'à la +condition de laisser comparaître les arbitrages qui le travaillent +réellement — et d'accepter que ces arbitrages puissent affecter sa +propre forme. C'est seulement à ce prix qu'il devient possible de +distinguer, à l'intérieur même des formes instituées, les scènes encore +actives, les scènes captées, les scènes fossilisées et les scènes +véritablement émergentes. -On peut alors reformuler la question de la souveraineté sur un autre plan. La souveraineté n’est plus pensable comme substance, comme monopole, comme incarnation plénière d’une volonté homogène, ni même comme pur pouvoir de trancher. Elle doit être saisie comme processus différé d’institution du commun à travers la reconnaissance disputée du dissensus. Une telle souveraineté n’appartient pas exclusivement à l’État, pas plus qu’elle ne se dissout dans une horizontalité sans formes. Elle se mesure à la capacité effective d’une société à rendre visibles, traversables et révisables les conflits qui l’engagent. Cela ne veut pas dire que tout doive être livré à la discussion permanente. Cela veut dire que nulle décision qui reconfigure profondément le commun ne peut être tenue pour politiquement habitable si elle n’a pas comparu selon des formes suffisantes. +On peut alors reformuler la question de la souveraineté sur un autre +plan. La souveraineté n'est plus pensable comme substance, comme +monopole, comme incarnation plénière d'une volonté homogène, ni même +comme pur pouvoir de trancher. Elle doit être saisie comme processus +différé d'institution du commun à travers la reconnaissance disputée du +dissensus. Une telle souveraineté n'appartient pas exclusivement à +l'État, pas plus qu'elle ne se dissout dans une horizontalité sans +formes. Elle se mesure à la capacité effective d'une société à rendre +visibles, traversables et révisables les conflits qui l'engagent. Cela +ne veut pas dire que tout doive être livré à la discussion permanente. +Cela veut dire que nulle décision qui reconfigure profondément le commun +ne peut être tenue pour politiquement habitable si elle n'a pas comparu +selon des formes suffisantes. -C’est ici que le différé redevient le cœur temporel du politique. Il ne désigne ni procrastination institutionnelle, ni temporisation tactique, ni simple report dilatoire. Il désigne le temps propre à l’archicration : celui par lequel un conflit cesse d’être une intensité nue pour devenir matière de langage, de mémoire, de procédure, de récit et de décision contestable. Sans lui, la politique se réduit à l’alternative désormais familière entre réaction immédiate, saturation affective, pilotage technocratique et gestion en temps réel. Avec lui, un dissensus peut changer de régime : sortir du cri ou du blocage, traverser plusieurs seuils — expression, reconnaissance, mise en forme, inscription, reprise — et devenir une épreuve commune sans cesser d’être conflictuel. +C'est ici que le différé redevient le cœur temporel du politique. Il ne +désigne ni procrastination institutionnelle, ni temporisation tactique, +ni simple report dilatoire. Il désigne le temps propre à l'archicration +: celui par lequel un conflit cesse d'être une intensité nue pour +devenir matière de langage, de mémoire, de procédure, de récit et de +décision contestable. Sans lui, la politique se réduit à l'alternative +désormais familière entre réaction immédiate, saturation affective, +pilotage technocratique et gestion en temps réel. Avec lui, un dissensus +peut changer de régime : sortir du cri ou du blocage, traverser +plusieurs seuils — expression, reconnaissance, mise en forme, +inscription, reprise — et devenir une épreuve commune sans cesser +d'être conflictuel. -Le différé ne dépolitise donc rien. Il empêche au contraire que le conflit soit abandonné soit à la pure brutalité du rapport de force, soit à sa neutralisation administrative. Il donne au dissensus le temps nécessaire pour cesser d’être seulement subi, crié ou mesuré, et commencer à être politiquement porté. +Le différé ne dépolitise donc rien. Il empêche au contraire que le +conflit soit abandonné soit à la pure brutalité du rapport de force, +soit à sa neutralisation administrative. Il donne au dissensus le temps +nécessaire pour cesser d'être seulement subi, crié ou mesuré, et +commencer à être politiquement porté. -Un cinquième micro-théâtre permet de le saisir : la scène faible de reprise réelle. Elle est rare, précaire, souvent locale, parfois institutionnellement modeste — et pourtant décisive. Ce peut être une assemblée où des personnes affectées disposent d’un temps suffisant pour mettre en récit une expérience, où les acteurs décisionnels doivent comparaître, répondre, entendre, reformuler, où le conflit n’est pas seulement enregistré mais contraint à produire des effets sur les règles elles-mêmes. Ce peut être un dispositif de codécision dans une organisation coopérative, une instance de conflit du travail qui ne réduit pas la parole à des paramètres, une convention territoriale effectivement adossée à un pouvoir de révision, une scène municipale où des arbitrages sur l’habiter, la mobilité, l’usage, les nuisances, la redistribution et la mémoire sont vraiment rejoués. +Un cinquième micro-théâtre permet de le saisir : la scène faible de +reprise réelle. Elle est rare, précaire, souvent locale, parfois +institutionnellement modeste — et pourtant décisive. Ce peut être une +assemblée où des personnes affectées disposent d'un temps suffisant pour +mettre en récit une expérience, où les acteurs décisionnels doivent +comparaître, répondre, entendre, reformuler, où le conflit n'est pas +seulement enregistré mais contraint à produire des effets sur les règles +elles-mêmes. Ce peut être un dispositif de codécision dans une +organisation coopérative, une instance de conflit du travail qui ne +réduit pas la parole à des paramètres, une convention territoriale +effectivement adossée à un pouvoir de révision, une scène municipale où +des arbitrages sur l'habiter, la mobilité, l'usage, les nuisances, la +redistribution et la mémoire sont vraiment rejoués. -Ces scènes ne résolvent pas le problème politique en général. Elles ont pourtant une valeur décisive : elles montrent qu’entre la scène souveraine qui surplombe, la consultation qui absorbe et le soulèvement qui éclate, il existe encore des formes où une société peut apprendre à répondre de ce qu’elle tranche. Elles montrent ainsi que l’archicration politique n’est pas une pure abstraction normative : elle existe, faiblement, partiellement, lorsqu’une société se dote de formes où les tensions peuvent réellement infléchir les architectures collectives. +Ces scènes ne résolvent pas le problème politique en général. Elles ont +pourtant une valeur décisive : elles montrent qu'entre la scène +souveraine qui surplombe, la consultation qui absorbe et le soulèvement +qui éclate, il existe encore des formes où une société peut apprendre à +répondre de ce qu'elle tranche. Elles montrent ainsi que l'archicration +politique n'est pas une pure abstraction normative : elle existe, +faiblement, partiellement, lorsqu'une société se dote de formes où les +tensions peuvent réellement infléchir les architectures collectives. -À l’inverse, les régimes technocratiques et managériaux contemporains se caractérisent par leur incapacité constitutive à supporter un tel différé. Leur logique est celle du flux, du temps réel, de la correction continue, de l’optimisation, de la préemption. Ils prétendent traiter le conflit comme anomalie à réduire, friction à amortir, donnée à intégrer ou variable à piloter. Ce qui devait comparaître politiquement devient alors signal. Ce qui devait être disputé devient seuil de risque. Ce qui devait faire scène devient profil, opinion mesurée, séquence médiatique, indicateur de satisfaction, donnée comportementale. Le présent se sature ; l’épreuve se raréfie ; la décision s’automatise ; la légitimation s’amincit. C’est ici que la crise du politique ouvre déjà, souterrainement, sur une autre mutation : celle où les tensions non traversées politiquement se trouvent reprises par des dispositifs computationnels qui promettent de les traiter sans trouble, par anticipation, par modulation, par traitement automatisé. +À l'inverse, les régimes technocratiques et managériaux contemporains se +caractérisent par leur incapacité constitutive à supporter un tel +différé. Leur logique est celle du flux, du temps réel, de la correction +continue, de l'optimisation, de la préemption. Ils prétendent traiter le +conflit comme anomalie à réduire, friction à amortir, donnée à intégrer +ou variable à piloter. Ce qui devait comparaître politiquement devient +alors signal. Ce qui devait être disputé devient seuil de risque. Ce qui +devait faire scène devient profil, opinion mesurée, séquence médiatique, +indicateur de satisfaction, donnée comportementale. Le présent se sature +; l'épreuve se raréfie ; la décision s'automatise ; la légitimation +s'amincit. C'est ici que la crise du politique ouvre déjà, +souterrainement, sur une autre mutation : celle où les tensions non +traversées politiquement se trouvent reprises par des dispositifs +computationnels qui promettent de les traiter sans trouble, par +anticipation, par modulation, par traitement automatisé. -Dès lors, la légitimation ne peut plus être pensée comme simple adhésion après coup. Elle doit être comprise comme effet de traversée : une décision n’est politiquement habitable ni parce qu’elle émane du bon centre, ni parce qu’elle a été juridiquement couverte, ni parce qu’elle se prétend techniquement rationnelle, mais parce qu’elle a suffisamment traversé les tensions qu’elle affecte. La représentativité, elle aussi, cesse d’être une propriété formelle des instances ; elle devient qualité de scène. Quant à la souveraineté, elle cesse d’être un bloc pour devenir capacité à ne pas abandonner le commun à des chaînes de décision qui n’ont plus à répondre. +Dès lors, la légitimation ne peut plus être pensée comme simple adhésion +après coup. Elle doit être comprise comme effet de traversée : une +décision n'est politiquement habitable ni parce qu'elle émane du bon +centre, ni parce qu'elle a été juridiquement couverte, ni parce qu'elle +se prétend techniquement rationnelle, mais parce qu'elle a suffisamment +traversé les tensions qu'elle affecte. La représentativité, elle aussi, +cesse d'être une propriété formelle des instances ; elle devient qualité +de scène. Quant à la souveraineté, elle cesse d'être un bloc pour +devenir capacité à ne pas abandonner le commun à des chaînes de décision +qui n'ont plus à répondre. -Restaurer la possibilité du politique ne consiste donc ni à reconduire mécaniquement les formes héritées, ni à opposer à la violence des structures une morale de la discussion. Cela signifie, plus rigoureusement, réinstituer des scènes où les conflits puissent apparaître, se temporaliser, être mis en récit, recevoir une forme opposable et trouver des modes de transduction légitimes. +Restaurer la possibilité du politique ne consiste donc ni à reconduire +mécaniquement les formes héritées, ni à opposer à la violence des +structures une morale de la discussion. Cela signifie, plus +rigoureusement, réinstituer des scènes où les conflits puissent +apparaître, se temporaliser, être mis en récit, recevoir une forme +opposable et trouver des modes de transduction légitimes. -Faute de telles scènes, le conflit ne disparaît pas. Il change de régime. Ce qui ne parvient plus à comparaître politiquement continue d’insister, mais se trouve repris par d’autres dispositifs de traitement, plus continus, plus automatiques, plus opaques, qui promettent de réguler sans exposer, d’anticiper sans débattre et d’ajuster sans répondre. Là où la décision politique n’assume plus la traversée du dissensus, une autre forme de gouvernement se prépare déjà : moins visible comme commandement, plus diffuse comme infrastructure, plus lisse comme évidence opératoire. +Faute de telles scènes, le conflit ne disparaît pas. Il change de +régime. Ce qui ne parvient plus à comparaître politiquement continue +d'insister, mais se trouve repris par d'autres dispositifs de +traitement, plus continus, plus automatiques, plus opaques, qui +promettent de réguler sans exposer, d'anticiper sans débattre et +d'ajuster sans répondre. Là où la décision politique n'assume plus la +traversée du dissensus, une autre forme de gouvernement se prépare déjà +: moins visible comme commandement, plus diffuse comme infrastructure, +plus lisse comme évidence opératoire. -C’est à ce seuil que la question politique commence à basculer. Non vers une simple suite thématique, mais vers une mutation de régime : lorsque le commun n’est plus rejoué dans des scènes suffisantes, il tend à être traité ailleurs, par d’autres chaînes, sous d’autres formes d’intelligibilité et de pouvoir. C’est là que s’ouvre la tension technologique. +C'est à ce seuil que la question politique commence à basculer. Non vers +une simple suite thématique, mais vers une mutation de régime : lorsque +le commun n'est plus rejoué dans des scènes suffisantes, il tend à être +traité ailleurs, par d'autres chaînes, sous d'autres formes +d'intelligibilité et de pouvoir. C'est là que s'ouvre la tension +technologique. ## **5.7 — Tensions technologiques : computation, automatisation, gouvernementalité** -Tout tient parfois en trois gestes à peine perceptibles. Un écran s’ouvre, un champ se remplit, un bouton appelle le clic. Rien, dans cette surface familière, n’annonce l’épaisseur de ce qui s’enclenche pourtant derrière elle : extraction de données, corrélations, croisements de profils, application de seuils, règles de priorisation, enchaînement de traitements dont la logique demeure intégralement hors de portée de celui qui les déclenche. L’usager n’assiste à rien de cela ; il ne voit ni les variables mobilisées, ni les pondérations retenues, ni les exclusions successives qui s’opèrent en silence. Puis la réponse arrive. Elle est brève, ferme, immédiatement effective. Ce qui s’est joué entre le geste le plus banal et l’effet qui s’impose n’a pas pris la forme d’une décision traversée, située, disputable : cela a été éprouvé comme un passage, comme un traitement, comme l’exécution silencieuse d’une chaîne qui n’a eu nul besoin de se rendre politiquement saisissable. +Tout tient parfois en trois gestes à peine perceptibles. Un écran +s'ouvre, un champ se remplit, un bouton appelle le clic. Rien, dans +cette surface familière, n'annonce l'épaisseur de ce qui s'enclenche +pourtant derrière elle : extraction de données, corrélations, +croisements de profils, application de seuils, règles de priorisation, +enchaînement de traitements dont la logique demeure intégralement hors +de portée de celui qui les déclenche. L'usager n'assiste à rien de cela +; il ne voit ni les variables mobilisées, ni les pondérations retenues, +ni les exclusions successives qui s'opèrent en silence. Puis la réponse +arrive. Elle est brève, ferme, immédiatement effective. Ce qui s'est +joué entre le geste le plus banal et l'effet qui s'impose n'a pas pris +la forme d'une décision traversée, située, disputable : cela a été +éprouvé comme un passage, comme un traitement, comme l'exécution +silencieuse d'une chaîne qui n'a eu nul besoin de se rendre +politiquement saisissable. -C’est à partir de ce seuil qu’il faut comprendre la transformation en cours. +C'est à partir de ce seuil qu'il faut comprendre la transformation en +cours. -La technique n’a jamais été extérieure à la régulation des conduites. Ce qui change aujourd’hui, c’est qu’elle ne vient plus seulement seconder des décisions formulées ailleurs : elle en préorganise les conditions, en distribue les marges et en balise les issues avant même qu’elles puissent être énoncées comme telles. Le pouvoir ne disparaît pas ; il s’incorpore dans l’architecture logicielle, dans les protocoles, dans les formats, dans les chaînes computationnelles qui trient les parcours, hiérarchisent les accès et rendent certaines alternatives improbables, d’autres coûteuses, d’autres imperceptibles. Ce qui relevait d’une décision identifiable tend ainsi à se déposer dans l’ordre du calculable, dans la manière dont un système détermine à l’avance ce qui pourra être enregistré, corrélé, priorisé ou écarté. +La technique n'a jamais été extérieure à la régulation des conduites. Ce +qui change aujourd'hui, c'est qu'elle ne vient plus seulement seconder +des décisions formulées ailleurs : elle en préorganise les conditions, +en distribue les marges et en balise les issues avant même qu'elles +puissent être énoncées comme telles. Le pouvoir ne disparaît pas ; il +s'incorpore dans l'architecture logicielle, dans les protocoles, dans +les formats, dans les chaînes computationnelles qui trient les parcours, +hiérarchisent les accès et rendent certaines alternatives improbables, +d'autres coûteuses, d'autres imperceptibles. Ce qui relevait d'une +décision identifiable tend ainsi à se déposer dans l'ordre du +calculable, dans la manière dont un système détermine à l'avance ce qui +pourra être enregistré, corrélé, priorisé ou écarté. -Sous cet angle, l’arcalité technologique ne prend plus d’abord la forme d’un corpus explicite de normes ou d’un récit fondateur aisément identifiable ; elle se loge dans le code, dans les formats, dans les standards, dans les classifications, dans les seuils qui définissent ce qui compte comme donnée pertinente et ce qui peut être ignoré sans conséquence. Elle se dépose dans l’architecture même du calcul, dans la manière dont une chaîne de traitement décide à l’avance ce qui pourra faire événement et ce qui restera absorbé dans le flux. +Sous cet angle, l'arcalité technologique ne prend plus d'abord la forme +d'un corpus explicite de normes ou d'un récit fondateur aisément +identifiable ; elle se loge dans le code, dans les formats, dans les +standards, dans les classifications, dans les seuils qui définissent ce +qui compte comme donnée pertinente et ce qui peut être ignoré sans +conséquence. Elle se dépose dans l'architecture même du calcul, dans la +manière dont une chaîne de traitement décide à l'avance ce qui pourra +faire événement et ce qui restera absorbé dans le flux. -La cratialité technologique, quant à elle, ne se situe pas à l’extérieur de ces structures. Elle traverse les usages, les détournements, les accélérations, les variations imprévues, les surcharges, les manipulations, les pratiques de contournement et les formes de réappropriation qui viennent éprouver les limites des architectures en place. Elle se manifeste dans les excès qui révèlent que le système n’est jamais parfaitement clos sur lui-même. +La cratialité technologique, quant à elle, ne se situe pas à l'extérieur +de ces structures. Elle traverse les usages, les détournements, les +accélérations, les variations imprévues, les surcharges, les +manipulations, les pratiques de contournement et les formes de +réappropriation qui viennent éprouver les limites des architectures en +place. Elle se manifeste dans les excès qui révèlent que le système +n'est jamais parfaitement clos sur lui-même. -Mais c’est précisément l’archicration qui s’amenuise. La scène où arcalité encodée et cratialité des usages pourraient être exposées, contestées, rejouées et révisées se raréfie. La régulation n’a nullement cessé d’agir ; elle agit même avec une efficacité croissante. Ce qui manque, c’est le lieu où ses opérations pourraient comparaître comme telles. Le problème technologique contemporain ne tient donc pas d’abord à la puissance des dispositifs, mais au fait qu’un nombre croissant de tris, de priorisations et d’exclusions se déploient sans adresse identifiable, sans délai institué et sans comparution suffisante. La décision ne vient plus après la controverse ; elle tend à la préempter. Elle ne se présente plus comme arbitrage exposé à la discussion, mais comme résultat de chaîne. Ce n’est donc pas la technique en tant que telle qui fait problème, mais l’absence de scène où elle pourrait être mise à l’épreuve. C’est depuis cette absence qu’il faut désormais lire les micro-théâtres technologiques contemporains. +Mais c'est précisément l'archicration qui s'amenuise. La scène où +arcalité encodée et cratialité des usages pourraient être exposées, +contestées, rejouées et révisées se raréfie. La régulation n'a nullement +cessé d'agir ; elle agit même avec une efficacité croissante. Ce qui +manque, c'est le lieu où ses opérations pourraient comparaître comme +telles. Le problème technologique contemporain ne tient donc pas d'abord +à la puissance des dispositifs, mais au fait qu'un nombre croissant de +tris, de priorisations et d'exclusions se déploient sans adresse +identifiable, sans délai institué et sans comparution suffisante. La +décision ne vient plus après la controverse ; elle tend à la préempter. +Elle ne se présente plus comme arbitrage exposé à la discussion, mais +comme résultat de chaîne. Ce n'est donc pas la technique en tant que +telle qui fait problème, mais l'absence de scène où elle pourrait être +mise à l'épreuve. C'est depuis cette absence qu'il faut désormais lire +les micro-théâtres technologiques contemporains. -C’est en cela que le régime technologique se distingue avec netteté des scènes précédemment traversées. Dans le régime politique, la décision pouvait encore être comprimée, captée ou simulée, mais elle continuait à se présenter sous des formes identifiables : allocution, procédure, vote, arbitrage assumé. Dans le régime médiatique, la scène se saturait, se fragmentait ou se déplaçait, mais quelque chose comparaissait encore, fût-ce sous une forme instable. Ici, le déplacement est plus radical : la normativité tend à opérer avant même d’avoir à se montrer. Ce qui oriente n’apparaît pas nécessairement comme orientation ; ce qui hiérarchise ne se donne pas comme hiérarchie ; ce qui exclut n’a pas besoin de se formuler comme exclusion. La spécificité du technologique ne tient donc pas seulement à l’automatisation des opérations, mais à une forme de régulation qui agit en amont de sa propre mise en scène. Là où d’autres régimes pouvaient encore être critiqués à partir de la scène qu’ils laissaient subsister, même affaiblie, le régime technologique tend à déplacer l’épreuve vers les conditions mêmes de l’apparition, de l’accès et du possible. Il ne supprime pas toute conflictualité ; il la pré-organise à un niveau où elle devient plus difficile à identifier comme telle. +C'est en cela que le régime technologique se distingue avec netteté des +scènes précédemment traversées. Dans le régime politique, la décision +pouvait encore être comprimée, captée ou simulée, mais elle continuait à +se présenter sous des formes identifiables : allocution, procédure, +vote, arbitrage assumé. Dans le régime médiatique, la scène se saturait, +se fragmentait ou se déplaçait, mais quelque chose comparaissait encore, +fût-ce sous une forme instable. Ici, le déplacement est plus radical : +la normativité tend à opérer avant même d'avoir à se montrer. Ce qui +oriente n'apparaît pas nécessairement comme orientation ; ce qui +hiérarchise ne se donne pas comme hiérarchie ; ce qui exclut n'a pas +besoin de se formuler comme exclusion. La spécificité du technologique +ne tient donc pas seulement à l'automatisation des opérations, mais à +une forme de régulation qui agit en amont de sa propre mise en scène. Là +où d'autres régimes pouvaient encore être critiqués à partir de la scène +qu'ils laissaient subsister, même affaiblie, le régime technologique +tend à déplacer l'épreuve vers les conditions mêmes de l'apparition, de +l'accès et du possible. Il ne supprime pas toute conflictualité ; il la +pré-organise à un niveau où elle devient plus difficile à identifier +comme telle. -L’un des lieux où cette transformation se laisse le plus nettement saisir est celui des dispositifs de scoring automatisé, non pas parce qu’ils seraient exceptionnellement puissants, mais parce qu’ils condensent, dans une forme presque minimale, la logique d’une décision qui se déploie sans comparution suffisante. Lorsqu’un système produit un jugement de solvabilité, de fiabilité ou de conformité, il n’offre que rarement la possibilité d’identifier la décision comme telle. Ce qui se présente à l’usager n’est pas un arbitrage situé, encore moins une scène où des critères pourraient être exposés et discutés, mais un résultat déjà constitué, stabilisé en sortie de chaîne. +L'un des lieux où cette transformation se laisse le plus nettement +saisir est celui des dispositifs de scoring automatisé, non pas parce +qu'ils seraient exceptionnellement puissants, mais parce qu'ils +condensent, dans une forme presque minimale, la logique d'une décision +qui se déploie sans comparution suffisante. Lorsqu'un système produit un +jugement de solvabilité, de fiabilité ou de conformité, il n'offre que +rarement la possibilité d'identifier la décision comme telle. Ce qui se +présente à l'usager n'est pas un arbitrage situé, encore moins une scène +où des critères pourraient être exposés et discutés, mais un résultat +déjà constitué, stabilisé en sortie de chaîne. -Ce résultat repose pourtant sur une architecture dense : historiques transactionnels, incidents passés, localisations, corrélations statistiques, inférences socio-économiques. Mais cette densité ne comparaît jamais. Elle reste enfouie dans des modules, des bases de données et des modèles dont l’usager ne perçoit que la sortie. L’usager ne fait face ni à un interlocuteur, ni à une décision assumée dans une forme opposable ; il reçoit un résultat déjà stabilisé, dont la genèse demeure enfouie dans la chaîne de traitement. +Ce résultat repose pourtant sur une architecture dense : historiques +transactionnels, incidents passés, localisations, corrélations +statistiques, inférences socio-économiques. Mais cette densité ne +comparaît jamais. Elle reste enfouie dans des modules, des bases de +données et des modèles dont l'usager ne perçoit que la sortie. L'usager +ne fait face ni à un interlocuteur, ni à une décision assumée dans une +forme opposable ; il reçoit un résultat déjà stabilisé, dont la genèse +demeure enfouie dans la chaîne de traitement. -Ce qui est en cause est plus profond : c’est la transformation de la décision elle-même en processus qui n’a plus besoin de se présenter comme décision pour produire ses effets. La chaîne computationnelle ne vient pas masquer un arbitrage préalable ; elle devient le lieu où l’arbitrage se dissout dans le traitement. +Ce qui est en cause est plus profond : c'est la transformation de la +décision elle-même en processus qui n'a plus besoin de se présenter +comme décision pour produire ses effets. La chaîne computationnelle ne +vient pas masquer un arbitrage préalable ; elle devient le lieu où +l'arbitrage se dissout dans le traitement. -La violence propre à ce régime ne tient donc pas uniquement au contenu des décisions — refus de crédit, limitation d’accès, priorisation différenciée — mais au fait qu’elles se déploient sans que puisse s’instituer une scène où ces décisions pourraient être comprises comme telles. Il n’y a plus de moment où la décision est adressée, exposée, assumée dans une forme qui la rende contestable. Elle est, pour ainsi dire, toujours déjà passée. +La violence propre à ce régime ne tient donc pas uniquement au contenu +des décisions — refus de crédit, limitation d'accès, priorisation +différenciée — mais au fait qu'elles se déploient sans que puisse +s'instituer une scène où ces décisions pourraient être comprises comme +telles. Il n'y a plus de moment où la décision est adressée, exposée, +assumée dans une forme qui la rende contestable. Elle est, pour ainsi +dire, toujours déjà passée. -Dans ce premier micro-théâtre, la tension archicratique apparaît sous une forme particulièrement nette. L’arcalité est fortement présente, mais sous forme encodée : elle se loge dans les paramètres du modèle, dans les choix de variables, dans les seuils de décision, dans la manière dont certaines corrélations sont jugées pertinentes et d’autres négligeables. La cratialité, quant à elle, se manifeste dans les usages, dans les tentatives d’adaptation des comportements, dans les stratégies d’évitement ou d’optimisation que les individus peuvent déployer face à ces systèmes. Mais l’archicration — la scène où ces deux dimensions pourraient être mises en tension — est structurellement faible. Elle n’est pas totalement absente, mais elle ne s’institue pas de manière durable ; elle apparaît au mieux de façon intermittente, à l’occasion de litiges, de controverses ponctuelles ou d’interventions régulatrices tardives. +Dans ce premier micro-théâtre, la tension archicratique apparaît sous +une forme particulièrement nette. L'arcalité est fortement présente, +mais sous forme encodée : elle se loge dans les paramètres du modèle, +dans les choix de variables, dans les seuils de décision, dans la +manière dont certaines corrélations sont jugées pertinentes et d'autres +négligeables. La cratialité, quant à elle, se manifeste dans les usages, +dans les tentatives d'adaptation des comportements, dans les stratégies +d'évitement ou d'optimisation que les individus peuvent déployer face à +ces systèmes. Mais l'archicration — la scène où ces deux dimensions +pourraient être mises en tension — est structurellement faible. Elle +n'est pas totalement absente, mais elle ne s'institue pas de manière +durable ; elle apparaît au mieux de façon intermittente, à l'occasion de +litiges, de controverses ponctuelles ou d'interventions régulatrices +tardives. -Ce premier régime peut être qualifié de scène préemptée : la décision y est produite de telle sorte qu’elle précède sa propre possibilité de comparution. Elle n’empêche pas toute contestation, mais elle en réduit fortement les conditions d’émergence, en plaçant le sujet dans une position où il doit d’abord reconstruire ce qui lui a été appliqué avant de pouvoir tenter de le discuter. +Ce premier régime peut être qualifié de scène préemptée : la décision y +est produite de telle sorte qu'elle précède sa propre possibilité de +comparution. Elle n'empêche pas toute contestation, mais elle en réduit +fortement les conditions d'émergence, en plaçant le sujet dans une +position où il doit d'abord reconstruire ce qui lui a été appliqué avant +de pouvoir tenter de le discuter. -Un second régime se déploie dans les dispositifs de classement, de recommandation et de hiérarchisation des contenus. Ici, la décision ne prend pas la forme d’un refus explicite ; elle module en continu les conditions de visibilité. Ce qui apparaît, ce qui est mis en avant, relégué ou recommandé résulte d’ajustements permanents qui ne se présentent jamais comme décision au sens classique. L’arcalité y réside dans les critères de pertinence, les métriques d’engagement et les paramètres de classement ; la cratialité, dans les usages, les contournements et les dynamiques virales. Mais l’archicration demeure faible : les principes de hiérarchisation sont partiellement connus, parfois commentés, rarement institués comme objet de délibération effective. +Un second régime se déploie dans les dispositifs de classement, de +recommandation et de hiérarchisation des contenus. Ici, la décision ne +prend pas la forme d'un refus explicite ; elle module en continu les +conditions de visibilité. Ce qui apparaît, ce qui est mis en avant, +relégué ou recommandé résulte d'ajustements permanents qui ne se +présentent jamais comme décision au sens classique. L'arcalité y réside +dans les critères de pertinence, les métriques d'engagement et les +paramètres de classement ; la cratialité, dans les usages, les +contournements et les dynamiques virales. Mais l'archicration demeure +faible : les principes de hiérarchisation sont partiellement connus, +parfois commentés, rarement institués comme objet de délibération +effective. -La régulation devient ainsi diffuse, continue, omniprésente, sans se laisser rapporter à une scène identifiable de comparution. La hiérarchisation devient un processus fluide, distribué, difficilement localisable. Le sujet n’est pas confronté à un refus net, mais à une modulation constante de ce qui lui est accessible, lisible et recommandable. +La régulation devient ainsi diffuse, continue, omniprésente, sans se +laisser rapporter à une scène identifiable de comparution. La +hiérarchisation devient un processus fluide, distribué, difficilement +localisable. Le sujet n'est pas confronté à un refus net, mais à une +modulation constante de ce qui lui est accessible, lisible et +recommandable. -Ce régime peut être décrit comme celui d’une scène distribuée sans comparution. La régulation y est omniprésente, mais elle ne se donne pas comme telle. Elle opère à travers des ajustements continus qui ne produisent pas de moment de confrontation identifiable. La visibilité y est régulée partout, sans jamais vraiment comparaître nulle part. +Ce régime peut être décrit comme celui d'une scène distribuée sans +comparution. La régulation y est omniprésente, mais elle ne se donne pas +comme telle. Elle opère à travers des ajustements continus qui ne +produisent pas de moment de confrontation identifiable. La visibilité y +est régulée partout, sans jamais vraiment comparaître nulle part. -Un troisième régime concerne les interfaces elles-mêmes. Un formulaire, un parcours utilisateur, une interface de saisie ne font pas que recueillir des informations ; ils préforment les catégories dans lesquelles elles pourront être formulées. Ce qui peut être dit, demandé ou déclaré est déjà encadré par des champs, des séquences et des options disponibles. On a ici affaire à une scène préformatée : l’arcalité est inscrite dans la structure même de l’interaction, la cratialité dans les détournements d’usage, et l’archicration demeure faible parce que les conditions de ce préformatage sont rarement disputées comme telles. +Un troisième régime concerne les interfaces elles-mêmes. Un formulaire, +un parcours utilisateur, une interface de saisie ne font pas que +recueillir des informations ; ils préforment les catégories dans +lesquelles elles pourront être formulées. Ce qui peut être dit, demandé +ou déclaré est déjà encadré par des champs, des séquences et des options +disponibles. On a ici affaire à une scène préformatée : l'arcalité est +inscrite dans la structure même de l'interaction, la cratialité dans les +détournements d'usage, et l'archicration demeure faible parce que les +conditions de ce préformatage sont rarement disputées comme telles. -Ces trois régimes — scène préemptée du *scoring*, scène distribuée du classement, scène préformatée de l’interface — ne sont pas exclusifs les uns des autres. Ils s’entrelacent, se renforcent, se superposent. Ils participent d’une même transformation : la tendance à déplacer la régulation en amont de sa propre visibilité, à organiser les conditions du possible avant que celles-ci puissent être explicitement formulées comme normes. +Ces trois régimes — scène préemptée du *scoring*, scène distribuée du +classement, scène préformatée de l'interface — ne sont pas exclusifs +les uns des autres. Ils s'entrelacent, se renforcent, se superposent. +Ils participent d'une même transformation : la tendance à déplacer la +régulation en amont de sa propre visibilité, à organiser les conditions +du possible avant que celles-ci puissent être explicitement formulées +comme normes. -Dans chacun de ces cas, la tension archicratique se manifeste de manière spécifique, mais selon une structure commune : une arcalité encodée, une cratialité diffuse, et une archicration affaiblie, intermittente ou difficilement instituable. Ce n’est pas que toute scène ait disparu ; c’est que la scène tend à perdre sa centralité comme lieu de régulation explicite. +Dans chacun de ces cas, la tension archicratique se manifeste de manière +spécifique, mais selon une structure commune : une arcalité encodée, une +cratialité diffuse, et une archicration affaiblie, intermittente ou +difficilement instituable. Ce n'est pas que toute scène ait disparu ; +c'est que la scène tend à perdre sa centralité comme lieu de régulation +explicite. -C’est à partir de cette première stratification qu’il devient possible de comprendre les formes plus visibles, plus conflictuelles, où la scène réapparaît, non pas comme condition ordinaire de la régulation, mais comme effet de rupture, de dysfonctionnement ou de dévoilement. +C'est à partir de cette première stratification qu'il devient possible +de comprendre les formes plus visibles, plus conflictuelles, où la scène +réapparaît, non pas comme condition ordinaire de la régulation, mais +comme effet de rupture, de dysfonctionnement ou de dévoilement. -Les régimes précédents n’abolissent jamais totalement la scène. Toute architecture technique reste traversée par des erreurs, des biais, des effets de seuil ou des détournements qui révèlent ce qu’elle absorbe ordinairement. Tant que ces phénomènes demeurent internes au traitement, ils relèvent de la correction technique. Mais lorsqu’ils affectent suffisamment de sujets pour franchir un seuil de publicisation, ils changent de statut : ce qui relevait du dysfonctionnement devient litige. +Les régimes précédents n'abolissent jamais totalement la scène. Toute +architecture technique reste traversée par des erreurs, des biais, des +effets de seuil ou des détournements qui révèlent ce qu'elle absorbe +ordinairement. Tant que ces phénomènes demeurent internes au traitement, +ils relèvent de la correction technique. Mais lorsqu'ils affectent +suffisamment de sujets pour franchir un seuil de publicisation, ils +changent de statut : ce qui relevait du dysfonctionnement devient +litige. -Un autre régime de dévoilement se manifeste dans les biais algorithmiques, dont l’exemple du système de recrutement développé puis abandonné par Amazon constitue un cas emblématique. Contrairement au bug au sens strict, il ne s’agit pas ici d’une erreur ponctuelle, mais d’un effet structurel. Le modèle, entraîné sur des données historiques marquées par des déséquilibres de genre, apprend à reproduire ces déséquilibres sous forme de critères de sélection. La faille révèle alors moins un accident qu’une vérité du système : sa prétendue objectivité reconduit déjà un ordre social sélectionné. +Un autre régime de dévoilement se manifeste dans les biais +algorithmiques, dont l'exemple du système de recrutement développé puis +abandonné par Amazon constitue un cas emblématique. Contrairement au bug +au sens strict, il ne s'agit pas ici d'une erreur ponctuelle, mais d'un +effet structurel. Le modèle, entraîné sur des données historiques +marquées par des déséquilibres de genre, apprend à reproduire ces +déséquilibres sous forme de critères de sélection. La faille révèle +alors moins un accident qu'une vérité du système : sa prétendue +objectivité reconduit déjà un ordre social sélectionné. -Ce cas permet de comprendre que l’arcalité technologique n’est jamais neutre. Les choix de variables, les modes d’apprentissage, les critères d’optimisation ne sont pas extérieurs au monde social ; ils en condensent certaines structures, qu’ils stabilisent ensuite dans des dispositifs apparemment objectifs. Ce que le système traite comme information pertinente est déjà le produit d’une sélection normative, même lorsque cette sélection n’est pas explicitement formulée. +Ce cas permet de comprendre que l'arcalité technologique n'est jamais +neutre. Les choix de variables, les modes d'apprentissage, les critères +d'optimisation ne sont pas extérieurs au monde social ; ils en +condensent certaines structures, qu'ils stabilisent ensuite dans des +dispositifs apparemment objectifs. Ce que le système traite comme +information pertinente est déjà le produit d'une sélection normative, +même lorsque cette sélection n'est pas explicitement formulée. -Le moment où ce biais devient visible — par des audits internes, des révélations médiatiques, des critiques publiques — constitue là encore une forme de réapparition de la scène. Ce qui était naturalisé comme fonctionnement technique est réinterprété comme problème politique. La question ne porte plus seulement sur l’efficacité du système, mais sur la légitimité des critères qu’il mobilise, sur les effets qu’il produit, sur les formes de discrimination qu’il reconduit. +Le moment où ce biais devient visible — par des audits internes, des +révélations médiatiques, des critiques publiques — constitue là encore +une forme de réapparition de la scène. Ce qui était naturalisé comme +fonctionnement technique est réinterprété comme problème politique. La +question ne porte plus seulement sur l'efficacité du système, mais sur +la légitimité des critères qu'il mobilise, sur les effets qu'il produit, +sur les formes de discrimination qu'il reconduit. -Dans ces différents cas, on peut identifier un régime que l’on pourrait qualifier de scène révélée par faille. La scène n’est pas instituée en amont du fonctionnement ; elle émerge lorsque ce fonctionnement rencontre ses propres limites. Elle est souvent locale, temporaire, dépendante d’événements singuliers. Elle n’est pas encore une archicration stabilisée, mais elle en constitue un indice, une ouverture, une possibilité. +Dans ces différents cas, on peut identifier un régime que l'on pourrait +qualifier de scène révélée par faille. La scène n'est pas instituée en +amont du fonctionnement ; elle émerge lorsque ce fonctionnement +rencontre ses propres limites. Elle est souvent locale, temporaire, +dépendante d'événements singuliers. Elle n'est pas encore une +archicration stabilisée, mais elle en constitue un indice, une +ouverture, une possibilité. -Cette forme de scène révèle en creux ce qui manque dans le régime ordinaire : des conditions instituées de comparution qui ne dépendent pas de la survenue d’un dysfonctionnement. Tant que la scène n’apparaît qu’à travers la faille, la régulation reste dominée par une logique où l’exposition du pouvoir est l’exception plutôt que la règle. +Cette forme de scène révèle en creux ce qui manque dans le régime +ordinaire : des conditions instituées de comparution qui ne dépendent +pas de la survenue d'un dysfonctionnement. Tant que la scène n'apparaît +qu'à travers la faille, la régulation reste dominée par une logique où +l'exposition du pouvoir est l'exception plutôt que la règle. -Ainsi, la cratialité technologique joue un rôle ambivalent. Elle est à la fois ce qui met en tension les architectures et ce qui permet, ponctuellement, leur mise en scène. Mais elle ne suffit pas à elle seule à instituer une archicration durable. Pour que celle-ci puisse se stabiliser, il faut que les conditions de la scène ne soient plus dépendantes des accidents du système, mais qu’elles soient intégrées à son fonctionnement même. +Ainsi, la cratialité technologique joue un rôle ambivalent. Elle est à +la fois ce qui met en tension les architectures et ce qui permet, +ponctuellement, leur mise en scène. Mais elle ne suffit pas à elle seule +à instituer une archicration durable. Pour que celle-ci puisse se +stabiliser, il faut que les conditions de la scène ne soient plus +dépendantes des accidents du système, mais qu'elles soient intégrées à +son fonctionnement même. -C’est à partir de cette limite que se pose la question suivante : comment passer d’une archicration intermittente, révélée par la faille, à une archicration instituée, intégrée aux infrastructures elles-mêmes ? +C'est à partir de cette limite que se pose la question suivante : +comment passer d'une archicration intermittente, révélée par la faille, +à une archicration instituée, intégrée aux infrastructures elles-mêmes ? -L’analyse des dispositifs computationnels resterait incomplète si elle demeurait cantonnée aux interfaces, aux algorithmes de tri ou aux chaînes de décision automatisée. Elle risquerait alors de reconduire, à son insu, l’un des effets les plus puissants du régime technologique contemporain : l’invisibilisation de sa matérialité. Car ce qui se présente comme flux d’information, comme circulation immatérielle de données, repose en réalité sur une infrastructure lourde, territorialisée, énergivore et extractive dont l’occultation constitue une condition de son acceptabilité sociale. +L'analyse des dispositifs computationnels resterait incomplète si elle +demeurait cantonnée aux interfaces, aux algorithmes de tri ou aux +chaînes de décision automatisée. Elle risquerait alors de reconduire, à +son insu, l'un des effets les plus puissants du régime technologique +contemporain : l'invisibilisation de sa matérialité. Car ce qui se +présente comme flux d'information, comme circulation immatérielle de +données, repose en réalité sur une infrastructure lourde, +territorialisée, énergivore et extractive dont l'occultation constitue +une condition de son acceptabilité sociale. -Le cloud n’est pas un nuage. Il est un ensemble de centres de données, de réseaux de transmission, de systèmes de refroidissement, de chaînes logistiques, de dispositifs énergétiques et de ressources matérielles dont l’extension ne cesse de croître. Les opérations les plus banales — recherche, recommandation, stockage, calcul — s’adossent à des infrastructures physiques mobilisant des quantités significatives d’électricité, d’eau et de matériaux. Les métaux critiques, tels que le cobalt, le lithium, le nickel ou les terres rares, sont extraits dans des contextes souvent marqués par des formes aiguës de violence sociale et environnementale. Les déchets électroniques s’accumulent, les nappes phréatiques sont sollicitées pour le refroidissement, les territoires sont reconfigurés par l’implantation de ces infrastructures. +Le cloud n'est pas un nuage. Il est un ensemble de centres de données, +de réseaux de transmission, de systèmes de refroidissement, de chaînes +logistiques, de dispositifs énergétiques et de ressources matérielles +dont l'extension ne cesse de croître. Les opérations les plus banales — recherche, recommandation, stockage, calcul — s'adossent à des +infrastructures physiques mobilisant des quantités significatives +d'électricité, d'eau et de matériaux. Les métaux critiques, tels que le +cobalt, le lithium, le nickel ou les terres rares, sont extraits dans +des contextes souvent marqués par des formes aiguës de violence sociale +et environnementale. Les déchets électroniques s'accumulent, les nappes +phréatiques sont sollicitées pour le refroidissement, les territoires +sont reconfigurés par l'implantation de ces infrastructures. -Cette matérialité n’est pas un décor. Elle appartient au régime technologique lui-même. Le numérique ne dématérialise pas le monde ; il en redistribue la charge matérielle. Il procure à certains des usages fluides, immédiats, continus, tout en déplaçant hors de leur champ de perception les coûts écologiques, extractifs et territoriaux qui rendent cette fluidité possible. Les bénéfices sont en scène ; les coûts, hors scène. Il en résulte une dissociation profonde entre les lieux d’usage, où l’efficacité apparaît, et les lieux d’impact, où s’accumulent la lourdeur énergétique, les tensions hydriques, l’extraction minière et les reconfigurations territoriales. Cette dissociation constitue une forme spécifique de désarchicration : la tension entre puissance technique et conditions matérielles de possibilité ne se présente plus comme un conflit unifié susceptible d’être pris en charge dans une scène commune. +Cette matérialité n'est pas un décor. Elle appartient au régime +technologique lui-même. Le numérique ne dématérialise pas le monde ; il +en redistribue la charge matérielle. Il procure à certains des usages +fluides, immédiats, continus, tout en déplaçant hors de leur champ de +perception les coûts écologiques, extractifs et territoriaux qui rendent +cette fluidité possible. Les bénéfices sont en scène ; les coûts, hors +scène. Il en résulte une dissociation profonde entre les lieux d'usage, +où l'efficacité apparaît, et les lieux d'impact, où s'accumulent la +lourdeur énergétique, les tensions hydriques, l'extraction minière et +les reconfigurations territoriales. Cette dissociation constitue une +forme spécifique de désarchicration : la tension entre puissance +technique et conditions matérielles de possibilité ne se présente plus +comme un conflit unifié susceptible d'être pris en charge dans une scène +commune. -Une telle configuration affaiblit profondément les conditions d’une régulation archicratique. La tension entre puissance technique et conditions matérielles de possibilité se trouve fragmentée entre des lieux, des acteurs et des temporalités qui ne coïncident pas. Les usages fluides apparaissent ici ; les coûts énergétiques, extractifs et territoriaux se concentrent ailleurs. On a donc affaire à une scène déplacée hors champ : les bénéfices sont immédiatement perceptibles dans les espaces d’usage, tandis que les conséquences demeurent dispersées dans d’autres territoires, d’autres chaînes logistiques, d’autres régimes de visibilité. Dès lors, une architecture peut se montrer très performante du point de vue de son efficacité interne tout en demeurant profondément problématique du point de vue de ses conditions écologiques, sociales et territoriales de possibilité. +Une telle configuration affaiblit profondément les conditions d'une +régulation archicratique. La tension entre puissance technique et +conditions matérielles de possibilité se trouve fragmentée entre des +lieux, des acteurs et des temporalités qui ne coïncident pas. Les usages +fluides apparaissent ici ; les coûts énergétiques, extractifs et +territoriaux se concentrent ailleurs. On a donc affaire à une scène +déplacée hors champ : les bénéfices sont immédiatement perceptibles dans +les espaces d'usage, tandis que les conséquences demeurent dispersées +dans d'autres territoires, d'autres chaînes logistiques, d'autres +régimes de visibilité. Dès lors, une architecture peut se montrer très +performante du point de vue de son efficacité interne tout en demeurant +profondément problématique du point de vue de ses conditions +écologiques, sociales et territoriales de possibilité. -Ce point est décisif, car il interdit de penser la technologie contemporaine à partir du seul couple efficacité / inefficacité. Une architecture peut fonctionner impeccablement dans l’horizon étroit de sa propre optimisation, tout en contribuant à déplacer hors champ les charges qui conditionnent cette optimisation même. Ce qu’elle gagne en fluidité locale peut se payer en tensions hydriques, en dépendances minières, en vulnérabilités logistiques ou en conflictualités territoriales que ses usagers ne rencontrent presque jamais comme parties intégrantes du même système. L’enjeu archicratique n’est donc pas seulement de rendre visibles des coûts cachés ; il est de réarticuler dans une même scène ce que le régime technique tend structurellement à disjoindre : l’expérience légère de l’usage, la lourdeur matérielle de l’infrastructure et les arbitrages collectifs que cette dissociation rend nécessaires. Tant que cette réarticulation ne se produit pas, la technologie demeure exposée à une contradiction profonde : elle promet de simplifier le monde vécu, tout en aggravant, hors du champ de cette simplification, les tensions dont dépend sa propre reproduction. +Ce point est décisif, car il interdit de penser la technologie +contemporaine à partir du seul couple efficacité / inefficacité. Une +architecture peut fonctionner impeccablement dans l'horizon étroit de sa +propre optimisation, tout en contribuant à déplacer hors champ les +charges qui conditionnent cette optimisation même. Ce qu'elle gagne en +fluidité locale peut se payer en tensions hydriques, en dépendances +minières, en vulnérabilités logistiques ou en conflictualités +territoriales que ses usagers ne rencontrent presque jamais comme +parties intégrantes du même système. L'enjeu archicratique n'est donc +pas seulement de rendre visibles des coûts cachés ; il est de +réarticuler dans une même scène ce que le régime technique tend +structurellement à disjoindre : l'expérience légère de l'usage, la +lourdeur matérielle de l'infrastructure et les arbitrages collectifs que +cette dissociation rend nécessaires. Tant que cette réarticulation ne se +produit pas, la technologie demeure exposée à une contradiction profonde +: elle promet de simplifier le monde vécu, tout en aggravant, hors du +champ de cette simplification, les tensions dont dépend sa propre +reproduction. -La régulation technique peut optimiser certains processus tout en contribuant à déstabiliser les équilibres écologiques et sociaux dont dépend la viabilité à long terme de l’ensemble. Une telle tension ne peut être résolue par la seule amélioration technique. Elle exige que les choix technologiques redeviennent visibles, discutables et arbitrables, c’est-à-dire une réarticulation effective des dimensions de l’archicratie : une arcalité capable d’intégrer les contraintes matérielles, une cratialité qui fasse apparaître les tensions réelles, et une archicration qui permette de les mettre en débat dans des scènes appropriées. +La régulation technique peut optimiser certains processus tout en +contribuant à déstabiliser les équilibres écologiques et sociaux dont +dépend la viabilité à long terme de l'ensemble. Une telle tension ne +peut être résolue par la seule amélioration technique. Elle exige que +les choix technologiques redeviennent visibles, discutables et +arbitrables, c'est-à-dire une réarticulation effective des dimensions de +l'archicratie : une arcalité capable d'intégrer les contraintes +matérielles, une cratialité qui fasse apparaître les tensions réelles, +et une archicration qui permette de les mettre en débat dans des scènes +appropriées. -À défaut, le risque est celui d’une dissociation croissante entre la puissance des infrastructures techniques et la capacité des sociétés à en réguler les effets. Le système peut continuer à fonctionner, voire à s’intensifier, tout en échappant de plus en plus aux formes de mise en tension qui permettraient d’en orienter le devenir. La désarchicration ne se manifeste alors pas seulement dans l’opacité des décisions ou dans l’absence de recours, mais dans l’incapacité à faire apparaître, dans un même espace, les différentes dimensions d’une même tension. +À défaut, le risque est celui d'une dissociation croissante entre la +puissance des infrastructures techniques et la capacité des sociétés à +en réguler les effets. Le système peut continuer à fonctionner, voire à +s'intensifier, tout en échappant de plus en plus aux formes de mise en +tension qui permettraient d'en orienter le devenir. La désarchicration +ne se manifeste alors pas seulement dans l'opacité des décisions ou dans +l'absence de recours, mais dans l'incapacité à faire apparaître, dans un +même espace, les différentes dimensions d'une même tension. -C’est à partir de cette limite que la question du design archicratique prend toute son importance. Elle ne concerne pas seulement les interfaces ou les algorithmes, mais l’ensemble des architectures, y compris dans leur dimension matérielle. Elle interroge la possibilité d’instituer des dispositifs où les conditions de production, les coûts écologiques, les effets sociaux et les usages puissent être articulés dans des scènes communes, où ils deviennent susceptibles d’être disputés et transformés. +C'est à partir de cette limite que la question du design archicratique +prend toute son importance. Elle ne concerne pas seulement les +interfaces ou les algorithmes, mais l'ensemble des architectures, y +compris dans leur dimension matérielle. Elle interroge la possibilité +d'instituer des dispositifs où les conditions de production, les coûts +écologiques, les effets sociaux et les usages puissent être articulés +dans des scènes communes, où ils deviennent susceptibles d'être disputés +et transformés. -Une telle transformation ne peut être pensée comme supplément éthique ajouté après coup. Elle implique une reconfiguration du design lui-même, entendu non comme stylisation de l’interface, mais comme organisation des conditions selon lesquelles une décision peut être produite, exposée et contestée. C’est en ce sens qu’il faut parler de design archicratique : une manière de concevoir les architectures techniques comme des lieux de mise en tension, et non comme de simples dispositifs d’exécution silencieuse. +Une telle transformation ne peut être pensée comme supplément éthique +ajouté après coup. Elle implique une reconfiguration du design lui-même, +entendu non comme stylisation de l'interface, mais comme organisation +des conditions selon lesquelles une décision peut être produite, exposée +et contestée. C'est en ce sens qu'il faut parler de design archicratique +: une manière de concevoir les architectures techniques comme des lieux +de mise en tension, et non comme de simples dispositifs d'exécution +silencieuse. -Une première dimension concerne l’explicitation des critères. Il ne s’agit pas de rendre tout calcul intégralement transparent, ce qui serait souvent illusoire, mais d’instituer des formes par lesquelles les paramètres décisifs puissent devenir accessibles à certains seuils critiques, lorsqu’une décision affecte concrètement des droits, des trajectoires ou des accès. +Une première dimension concerne l'explicitation des critères. Il ne +s'agit pas de rendre tout calcul intégralement transparent, ce qui +serait souvent illusoire, mais d'instituer des formes par lesquelles les +paramètres décisifs puissent devenir accessibles à certains seuils +critiques, lorsqu'une décision affecte concrètement des droits, des +trajectoires ou des accès. -Une deuxième dimension concerne l’introduction de seuils de suspension. Dans les systèmes hautement automatisés, la continuité du traitement tend à effacer les moments où une décision pourrait être reprise. Un design archicratique réintroduit au contraire, à certains points critiques, des interruptions où le flux cesse d’être pure exécution pour devenir objet d’examen. +Une deuxième dimension concerne l'introduction de seuils de suspension. +Dans les systèmes hautement automatisés, la continuité du traitement +tend à effacer les moments où une décision pourrait être reprise. Un +design archicratique réintroduit au contraire, à certains points +critiques, des interruptions où le flux cesse d'être pure exécution pour +devenir objet d'examen. -Une troisième dimension tient à la structuration des recours. La contestation ne peut rester une option périphérique, formellement offerte mais pratiquement inopérante. Elle doit être pensée comme une composante interne du système : interlocuteurs identifiables, délais praticables, possibilité de reformulation, espace où l’objection est traitée comme objection et non comme simple anomalie à résorber. +Une troisième dimension tient à la structuration des recours. La +contestation ne peut rester une option périphérique, formellement +offerte mais pratiquement inopérante. Elle doit être pensée comme une +composante interne du système : interlocuteurs identifiables, délais +praticables, possibilité de reformulation, espace où l'objection est +traitée comme objection et non comme simple anomalie à résorber. -Ces dimensions composent ce qu’on peut appeler des rituels de friction. Toute automatisation valorise la fluidité ; poussée à l’extrême, cette fluidité efface les conditions mêmes de la contestation. La friction n’est donc pas ici un défaut du système, mais l’un de ses seuils de légitimité : le moment où l’usager cesse d’être simple récepteur d’un résultat pour redevenir sujet capable d’interpellation. +Ces dimensions composent ce qu'on peut appeler des rituels de friction. +Toute automatisation valorise la fluidité ; poussée à l'extrême, cette +fluidité efface les conditions mêmes de la contestation. La friction +n'est donc pas ici un défaut du système, mais l'un de ses seuils de +légitimité : le moment où l'usager cesse d'être simple récepteur d'un +résultat pour redevenir sujet capable d'interpellation. -En effet, une archicration technologique conséquente ne peut s’arrêter aux seules interfaces. Elle doit aussi reterritorialiser les infrastructures, c’est-à-dire réinscrire centres de données, ressources hydriques, chaînes extractives, coûts énergétiques et impacts territoriaux dans des scènes où ces dimensions puissent être articulées aux usages qu’elles rendent possibles. +En effet, une archicration technologique conséquente ne peut s'arrêter +aux seules interfaces. Elle doit aussi reterritorialiser les +infrastructures, c'est-à-dire réinscrire centres de données, ressources +hydriques, chaînes extractives, coûts énergétiques et impacts +territoriaux dans des scènes où ces dimensions puissent être articulées +aux usages qu'elles rendent possibles. -Enfin, elle suppose une architectonisation du refus. Refuser un dispositif de surveillance, contester un traitement automatisé, s’opposer à une implantation infrastructurelle ou suspendre une orientation technique ne doivent pas demeurer des possibilités extérieures et résiduelles ; elles doivent recevoir une forme reconnue à l’intérieur même des architectures de décision. +Enfin, elle suppose une architectonisation du refus. Refuser un +dispositif de surveillance, contester un traitement automatisé, +s'opposer à une implantation infrastructurelle ou suspendre une +orientation technique ne doivent pas demeurer des possibilités +extérieures et résiduelles ; elles doivent recevoir une forme reconnue à +l'intérieur même des architectures de décision. -Ces dimensions ne composent pas un programme fermé. Elles dessinent plutôt les conditions minimales à partir desquelles une architecture technique pourrait cesser d’être simple chaîne d’exécution pour redevenir, au moins partiellement, scène de régulation. +Ces dimensions ne composent pas un programme fermé. Elles dessinent +plutôt les conditions minimales à partir desquelles une architecture +technique pourrait cesser d'être simple chaîne d'exécution pour +redevenir, au moins partiellement, scène de régulation. -Il faut toutefois mesurer l’exigence de ce déplacement. Réintroduire de l’archicration dans des dispositifs computationnels ne consiste pas à juxtaposer un supplément de transparence à des chaînes qui resteraient fondamentalement inchangées. Cela suppose de modifier le statut même de l’architecture : non plus seulement machine à traiter, mais forme capable d’assumer que certains de ses effets doivent pouvoir être ralentis, repris, reformulés, contestés et parfois refusés. Une telle transformation entre immédiatement en tension avec les impératifs dominants d’optimisation, de fluidité, d’automatisation continue et de réduction des coûts de traitement. C’est pourquoi le design archicratique ne peut être pensé comme simple amélioration ergonomique ou correctif moral. Il engage une conflictualité interne au régime technique lui-même : faut-il maximiser la vitesse d’exécution ou préserver des seuils de contestabilité ? faut-il lisser l’expérience utilisateur ou maintenir des points où la chaîne accepte de se laisser interroger ? faut-il réduire toute friction ou reconnaître que certaines frictions constituent précisément le prix d’une régulation légitime ? En ce sens, l’archicration technologique n’est pas la pacification du dispositif ; elle est la forme sous laquelle celui-ci accepte de ne pas se refermer entièrement sur sa propre logique d’efficacité. +Il faut toutefois mesurer l'exigence de ce déplacement. Réintroduire de +l'archicration dans des dispositifs computationnels ne consiste pas à +juxtaposer un supplément de transparence à des chaînes qui resteraient +fondamentalement inchangées. Cela suppose de modifier le statut même de +l'architecture : non plus seulement machine à traiter, mais forme +capable d'assumer que certains de ses effets doivent pouvoir être +ralentis, repris, reformulés, contestés et parfois refusés. Une telle +transformation entre immédiatement en tension avec les impératifs +dominants d'optimisation, de fluidité, d'automatisation continue et de +réduction des coûts de traitement. C'est pourquoi le design +archicratique ne peut être pensé comme simple amélioration ergonomique +ou correctif moral. Il engage une conflictualité interne au régime +technique lui-même : faut-il maximiser la vitesse d'exécution ou +préserver des seuils de contestabilité ? faut-il lisser l'expérience +utilisateur ou maintenir des points où la chaîne accepte de se laisser +interroger ? faut-il réduire toute friction ou reconnaître que certaines +frictions constituent précisément le prix d'une régulation légitime ? En +ce sens, l'archicration technologique n'est pas la pacification du +dispositif ; elle est la forme sous laquelle celui-ci accepte de ne pas +se refermer entièrement sur sa propre logique d'efficacité. -Ce qui est en jeu, en dernière instance, n’est pas la simple amélioration des systèmes existants, mais la transformation du rapport entre technique et régulation. Tant que les architectures computationnelles fonctionneront principalement selon une logique d’exécution silencieuse, la tension entre leur puissance et la capacité des sociétés à les orienter continuera de s’accroître. La réouverture durable des scènes suppose que cette logique soit infléchie, que la décision ne soit plus seulement produite dans la chaîne, mais qu’elle puisse être reprise dans des espaces où elle devient objet de discussion. +Ce qui est en jeu, en dernière instance, n'est pas la simple +amélioration des systèmes existants, mais la transformation du rapport +entre technique et régulation. Tant que les architectures +computationnelles fonctionneront principalement selon une logique +d'exécution silencieuse, la tension entre leur puissance et la capacité +des sociétés à les orienter continuera de s'accroître. La réouverture +durable des scènes suppose que cette logique soit infléchie, que la +décision ne soit plus seulement produite dans la chaîne, mais qu'elle +puisse être reprise dans des espaces où elle devient objet de +discussion. -Ainsi comprise, l’archicration technologique ne vient pas s’ajouter à la technique comme une couche extérieure. Elle en constitue la condition de légitimité. Elle est ce qui permet de transformer des dispositifs de traitement en dispositifs de régulation, c’est-à-dire en architectures capables d’intégrer, dans leur fonctionnement même, la possibilité du dissensus. +Ainsi comprise, l'archicration technologique ne vient pas s'ajouter à la +technique comme une couche extérieure. Elle en constitue la condition de +légitimité. Elle est ce qui permet de transformer des dispositifs de +traitement en dispositifs de régulation, c'est-à-dire en architectures +capables d'intégrer, dans leur fonctionnement même, la possibilité du +dissensus. -Au terme de ce parcours, trois lignes de force se dégagent. D’abord, l’encodage croissant des conditions du possible : la normativité se déplace vers des formats, des protocoles et des seuils qui décident en amont de ce qui pourra être calculé, visible, priorisé ou exclu. Ensuite, la continuité du traitement : la décision tend à devenir processus distribué, enchaînement d’ajustements plus qu’acte exposé. Enfin, la raréfaction des scènes : l’archicration ne disparaît pas, mais devient fragile, intermittente, souvent dépendante de failles, de crises ou de révélations qui seules contraignent le système à comparaître. C’est de leur articulation que naît une gouvernementalité computationnelle, où le pouvoir ne s’énonce plus d’abord comme commandement, mais s’incorpore dans des architectures capables d’orienter les conduites, de distribuer les possibilités et de moduler les trajectoires. +Au terme de ce parcours, trois lignes de force se dégagent. D'abord, +l'encodage croissant des conditions du possible : la normativité se +déplace vers des formats, des protocoles et des seuils qui décident en +amont de ce qui pourra être calculé, visible, priorisé ou exclu. +Ensuite, la continuité du traitement : la décision tend à devenir +processus distribué, enchaînement d'ajustements plus qu'acte exposé. +Enfin, la raréfaction des scènes : l'archicration ne disparaît pas, mais +devient fragile, intermittente, souvent dépendante de failles, de crises +ou de révélations qui seules contraignent le système à comparaître. +C'est de leur articulation que naît une gouvernementalité +computationnelle, où le pouvoir ne s'énonce plus d'abord comme +commandement, mais s'incorpore dans des architectures capables +d'orienter les conduites, de distribuer les possibilités et de moduler +les trajectoires. -Une telle transformation rejaillit directement sur les catégories classiques du politique. La souveraineté se reconfigure dans des architectures qui préorganisent les conditions de la décision ; la représentativité se trouve débordée par des régulations qui opèrent hors des scènes instituées ; la légitimation tend à se déplacer vers des critères d’efficacité, de performance et de fiabilité technique. Or ces critères ne suffisent jamais, à eux seuls, à fonder la légitimité d’une régulation qui affecte des droits, des trajectoires ou des conditions d’existence. +Une telle transformation rejaillit directement sur les catégories +classiques du politique. La souveraineté se reconfigure dans des +architectures qui préorganisent les conditions de la décision ; la +représentativité se trouve débordée par des régulations qui opèrent hors +des scènes instituées ; la légitimation tend à se déplacer vers des +critères d'efficacité, de performance et de fiabilité technique. Or ces +critères ne suffisent jamais, à eux seuls, à fonder la légitimité d'une +régulation qui affecte des droits, des trajectoires ou des conditions +d'existence. -La tension technologique ne constitue donc pas un objet isolé. Les infrastructures computationnelles sont prises dans des rapports de force, des dépendances, des rivalités et des stratégies qui débordent immédiatement le cadre local de leurs usages. Ce qui se joue ici ouvre déjà sur une autre échelle : celle où plateformes, réseaux, chaînes logistiques, ressources critiques, souverainetés numériques et puissances étatiques se confrontent dans des cadres de régulation encore insuffisamment institués. Autrement dit : la question technologique débouche directement sur la question géopolitique. +La tension technologique ne constitue donc pas un objet isolé. Les +infrastructures computationnelles sont prises dans des rapports de +force, des dépendances, des rivalités et des stratégies qui débordent +immédiatement le cadre local de leurs usages. Ce qui se joue ici ouvre +déjà sur une autre échelle : celle où plateformes, réseaux, chaînes +logistiques, ressources critiques, souverainetés numériques et +puissances étatiques se confrontent dans des cadres de régulation encore +insuffisamment institués. Autrement dit : la question technologique +débouche directement sur la question géopolitique. ## 5.8 — Tensions géopolitiques : multipolarité, conflictualité, légitimation internationale -Une salle se remplit. Les délégations prennent place selon un protocole qui n’a presque pas changé. Les plaques nominatives sont alignées, les casques de traduction disposés avec précision, les écrans affichent les projets de résolution dans plusieurs langues. Les gestes sont connus : on ajuste un micro, on consulte un dossier, on échange quelques mots à voix basse, on corrige au stylo une formulation déjà négociée ailleurs. Les corps s’inscrivent dans une chorégraphie maîtrisée, héritée, répétée. Rien ici n’est improvisé. Tout est fait pour que la parole puisse advenir dans des conditions stabilisées, pour que le conflit puisse se dire sans immédiatement se déployer, pour qu’une puissance n’ait pas d’emblée à se manifester sous forme de frappe, de blocus, de rupture de chaîne ou de menace stratégique. La salle promet une différence : ici, ce qui oppose doit encore, au moins en droit, comparaître avant de s’exécuter. +Une salle se remplit. Les délégations prennent place selon un protocole +qui n'a presque pas changé. Les plaques nominatives sont alignées, les +casques de traduction disposés avec précision, les écrans affichent les +projets de résolution dans plusieurs langues. Les gestes sont connus : +on ajuste un micro, on consulte un dossier, on échange quelques mots à +voix basse, on corrige au stylo une formulation déjà négociée ailleurs. +Les corps s'inscrivent dans une chorégraphie maîtrisée, héritée, +répétée. Rien ici n'est improvisé. Tout est fait pour que la parole +puisse advenir dans des conditions stabilisées, pour que le conflit +puisse se dire sans immédiatement se déployer, pour qu'une puissance +n'ait pas d'emblée à se manifester sous forme de frappe, de blocus, de +rupture de chaîne ou de menace stratégique. La salle promet une +différence : ici, ce qui oppose doit encore, au moins en droit, +comparaître avant de s'exécuter. -Chacun sait déjà, ou croit savoir, ce qui va être dit. Les mots seront graves, pesés, saturés de droit, d’histoire, de sécurité, de paix, d’ordre international, de souveraineté, de responsabilité. Les griefs seront énumérés, les condamnations formulées, les justifications ordonnées selon des chaînes argumentatives rodées. Le passé sera mobilisé pour établir une légitimité, le droit pour qualifier une violation, la sécurité pour nommer une nécessité, la mémoire pour transformer une décision en réparation ou une intervention en prévention. Tout semble réuni pour qu’un conflit puisse comparaître : des acteurs identifiables, un cadre reconnu, des procédures établies, des langues de médiation, des normes communes au moins en apparence. À ce niveau, la géopolitique semble encore promise à une scène. +Chacun sait déjà, ou croit savoir, ce qui va être dit. Les mots seront +graves, pesés, saturés de droit, d'histoire, de sécurité, de paix, +d'ordre international, de souveraineté, de responsabilité. Les griefs +seront énumérés, les condamnations formulées, les justifications +ordonnées selon des chaînes argumentatives rodées. Le passé sera +mobilisé pour établir une légitimité, le droit pour qualifier une +violation, la sécurité pour nommer une nécessité, la mémoire pour +transformer une décision en réparation ou une intervention en +prévention. Tout semble réuni pour qu'un conflit puisse comparaître : +des acteurs identifiables, un cadre reconnu, des procédures établies, +des langues de médiation, des normes communes au moins en apparence. À +ce niveau, la géopolitique semble encore promise à une scène. Et pourtant, quelque chose ne tient plus. -Les positions se succèdent sans réellement se rencontrer. Les interventions s’enchaînent, mais ne produisent pas de prise mutuelle. Ce qui vaut comme preuve pour les uns est disqualifié comme construction pour les autres ; ce qui est nommé agression ici est reconduit ailleurs comme défense anticipée, nécessité stratégique, sécurisation d’une frontière exposée ou correction d’un déséquilibre plus ancien. Le droit est invoqué de part et d’autre, mais il ne constitue plus un espace partagé de qualification. Il fonctionne comme langue de légitimation interne à des régimes de conflit qui ne partagent plus pleinement la même scène. La parole circule, mais elle ne lie plus de manière symétrique. Elle formule, elle archive, elle dénonce, elle rappelle, mais elle ne contraint pas à une épreuve mutuelle suffisamment reconnue. +Les positions se succèdent sans réellement se rencontrer. Les +interventions s'enchaînent, mais ne produisent pas de prise mutuelle. Ce +qui vaut comme preuve pour les uns est disqualifié comme construction +pour les autres ; ce qui est nommé agression ici est reconduit ailleurs +comme défense anticipée, nécessité stratégique, sécurisation d'une +frontière exposée ou correction d'un déséquilibre plus ancien. Le droit +est invoqué de part et d'autre, mais il ne constitue plus un espace +partagé de qualification. Il fonctionne comme langue de légitimation +interne à des régimes de conflit qui ne partagent plus pleinement la +même scène. La parole circule, mais elle ne lie plus de manière +symétrique. Elle formule, elle archive, elle dénonce, elle rappelle, +mais elle ne contraint pas à une épreuve mutuelle suffisamment reconnue. -Les institutions parlent, mais leur parole ne suffit plus à ouvrir un espace où le différend puisse être travaillé. Elle circule, elle archive, elle formalise, mais elle n’ordonne plus la conflictualité dans une forme commune. Elle ne fait pas disparaître la guerre ; elle échoue de plus en plus souvent à produire le seuil où la guerre, la rivalité, la coercition, la dépendance, la menace ou l’encerclement puissent être repris comme matière disputable. À la sortie, les décisions se déploient ailleurs : sanctions, redéploiements logistiques, corridors énergétiques, ventes d’armes, blocus, alignements diplomatiques, restrictions technologiques, repositionnements navals, contrôles d’accès, limitation des dépendances. La décision ne manque pas. Elle s’exécute. Mais elle ne s’est pas tenue ici. Elle n’a pas comparu. +Les institutions parlent, mais leur parole ne suffit plus à ouvrir un +espace où le différend puisse être travaillé. Elle circule, elle +archive, elle formalise, mais elle n'ordonne plus la conflictualité dans +une forme commune. Elle ne fait pas disparaître la guerre ; elle échoue +de plus en plus souvent à produire le seuil où la guerre, la rivalité, +la coercition, la dépendance, la menace ou l'encerclement puissent être +repris comme matière disputable. À la sortie, les décisions se déploient +ailleurs : sanctions, redéploiements logistiques, corridors +énergétiques, ventes d'armes, blocus, alignements diplomatiques, +restrictions technologiques, repositionnements navals, contrôles +d'accès, limitation des dépendances. La décision ne manque pas. Elle +s'exécute. Mais elle ne s'est pas tenue ici. Elle n'a pas comparu. -Ce décalage ne doit pas être minimisé. Il n’est pas une simple crise d’efficacité institutionnelle. Il n’est pas seulement le symptôme d’une impuissance politique face à des conflits plus durs, plus rapides ou plus nombreux. Il touche à la forme même de la régulation mondiale. Car ce qui s’affaiblit ici, ce n’est pas seulement l’autorité de tel ou tel organe, ni même l’universalité proclamée de certaines normes. Ce qui s’affaiblit, c’est la capacité à faire de la conflictualité mondiale autre chose qu’un choc d’effectivités rivales ou qu’une juxtaposition de récits fermés. C’est à partir de cette disjonction qu’il faut comprendre la transformation géopolitique contemporaine. +Ce décalage ne doit pas être minimisé. Il n'est pas une simple crise +d'efficacité institutionnelle. Il n'est pas seulement le symptôme d'une +impuissance politique face à des conflits plus durs, plus rapides ou +plus nombreux. Il touche à la forme même de la régulation mondiale. Car +ce qui s'affaiblit ici, ce n'est pas seulement l'autorité de tel ou tel +organe, ni même l'universalité proclamée de certaines normes. Ce qui +s'affaiblit, c'est la capacité à faire de la conflictualité mondiale +autre chose qu'un choc d'effectivités rivales ou qu'une juxtaposition de +récits fermés. C'est à partir de cette disjonction qu'il faut comprendre +la transformation géopolitique contemporaine. -Le trouble actuel ne peut être réduit ni à un simple retour des logiques de puissance, ni à une montée généralisée de la conflictualité, ni même à l’affaiblissement des institutions internationales héritées. Ce qui se joue est plus profond. Il touche aux conditions mêmes dans lesquelles un conflit mondial peut encore apparaître comme disputable — c’est-à-dire susceptible d’être exposé, nommé, différé, traduit, traversé, sans être immédiatement absorbé dans la pure effectivité de la force ou dans la juxtaposition de récits incompatibles. La crise n’est pas absence de normes, ni disparition de toute régulation. Elle tient à l’affaiblissement de la scène où normes, puissances et conflictualités pourraient encore comparaître dans une forme commune. +Le trouble actuel ne peut être réduit ni à un simple retour des logiques +de puissance, ni à une montée généralisée de la conflictualité, ni même +à l'affaiblissement des institutions internationales héritées. Ce qui se +joue est plus profond. Il touche aux conditions mêmes dans lesquelles un +conflit mondial peut encore apparaître comme disputable — c'est-à-dire +susceptible d'être exposé, nommé, différé, traduit, traversé, sans être +immédiatement absorbé dans la pure effectivité de la force ou dans la +juxtaposition de récits incompatibles. La crise n'est pas absence de +normes, ni disparition de toute régulation. Elle tient à +l'affaiblissement de la scène où normes, puissances et conflictualités +pourraient encore comparaître dans une forme commune. -Autrement dit, ce qui se défait n’est pas la régulation mondiale elle-même, mais son théâtre. +Autrement dit, ce qui se défait n'est pas la régulation mondiale +elle-même, mais son théâtre. -Il faut prendre cette formule au sérieux. Dire que le théâtre se défait ne signifie pas que le monde tomberait dans un chaos nu, sans formes ni cadres. Les institutions demeurent, les traités aussi, les organisations internationales continuent de produire des textes, les diplomaties de négocier, les interdépendances de structurer les possibilités d’action. Rien n’indique donc une dissolution simple. Ce qui se produit est plus déstabilisant : les éléments demeurent, mais leur articulation ne tient plus. Les normes sont toujours là, la force aussi, les institutions également ; ce qui devient incertain, c’est leur capacité à se rencontrer dans un espace suffisamment reconnu pour que le conflit puisse s’y tenir autrement que comme affrontement direct ou comme superposition de justifications irréconciliables. +Il faut prendre cette formule au sérieux. Dire que le théâtre se défait +ne signifie pas que le monde tomberait dans un chaos nu, sans formes ni +cadres. Les institutions demeurent, les traités aussi, les organisations +internationales continuent de produire des textes, les diplomaties de +négocier, les interdépendances de structurer les possibilités d'action. +Rien n'indique donc une dissolution simple. Ce qui se produit est plus +déstabilisant : les éléments demeurent, mais leur articulation ne tient +plus. Les normes sont toujours là, la force aussi, les institutions +également ; ce qui devient incertain, c'est leur capacité à se +rencontrer dans un espace suffisamment reconnu pour que le conflit +puisse s'y tenir autrement que comme affrontement direct ou comme +superposition de justifications irréconciliables. -C’est en ce sens qu’il faut parler d’une crise de l’archicration mondiale. L’arcalité géopolitique demeure : chartes, traités, conventions, principes de souveraineté, interdictions relatives à la guerre, catégories de qualification des conflits, des crimes et des obligations. Le monde n’est pas post-normatif. Les normes continuent d’être invoquées avec une intensité parfois spectaculaire, mais cette intensité même ne garantit plus qu’elles fassent scène. Elles demeurent disponibles comme langage de qualification et de rappel, sans toujours demeurer capables d’obliger les antagonistes à se mesurer à elles dans une épreuve reconnue. +C'est en ce sens qu'il faut parler d'une crise de l'archicration +mondiale. L'arcalité géopolitique demeure : chartes, traités, +conventions, principes de souveraineté, interdictions relatives à la +guerre, catégories de qualification des conflits, des crimes et des +obligations. Le monde n'est pas post-normatif. Les normes continuent +d'être invoquées avec une intensité parfois spectaculaire, mais cette +intensité même ne garantit plus qu'elles fassent scène. Elles demeurent +disponibles comme langage de qualification et de rappel, sans toujours +demeurer capables d'obliger les antagonistes à se mesurer à elles dans +une épreuve reconnue. -Mais cette arcalité tend de plus en plus à subsister comme ressource de positionnement, de dénonciation, d’auto-légitimation ou d’archivage, plutôt que comme opérateur vivant d’une confrontation traversable. Dans le même temps, la cratialité géopolitique s’intensifie : sanctions, embargos, dépendances industrielles, chaînes d’approvisionnement, corridors maritimes, architectures de paiement, technologies critiques, capacités de projection ou de blocage. Là où l’arcalité a besoin, au moins partiellement, d’une scène où elle puisse valoir, la cratialité agit directement sur les marges du possible. +Mais cette arcalité tend de plus en plus à subsister comme ressource de +positionnement, de dénonciation, d'auto-légitimation ou d'archivage, +plutôt que comme opérateur vivant d'une confrontation traversable. Dans +le même temps, la cratialité géopolitique s'intensifie : sanctions, +embargos, dépendances industrielles, chaînes d'approvisionnement, +corridors maritimes, architectures de paiement, technologies critiques, +capacités de projection ou de blocage. Là où l'arcalité a besoin, au +moins partiellement, d'une scène où elle puisse valoir, la cratialité +agit directement sur les marges du possible. -Entre les deux devrait se tenir l’archicration : la capacité d’instituer un espace où normes et puissances peuvent comparaître ensemble, entrer en contradiction, être traduites, différées, infléchies. Or c’est précisément cette capacité qui se fragilise. La scène ne disparaît pas absolument, mais elle cesse d’être la condition ordinaire de la régulation mondiale. La crise géopolitique contemporaine tient donc moins à une disparition du droit, ou à un retour pur de la force, qu’à la désarticulation croissante entre une arcalité qui demeure, une cratialité qui s’intensifie, et une archicration qui ne parvient plus à faire tenir leur rapport dans une forme reconnue. La question centrale n’est plus seulement : qui agit, qui domine, qui résiste ? Elle devient : où et comment ces actions peuvent-elles encore comparaître comme différend, plutôt que se déployer comme pure effectivité ? La géopolitique cesse alors d’être seulement une distribution de puissances. Elle devient un problème de comparution. +Entre les deux devrait se tenir l'archicration : la capacité d'instituer +un espace où normes et puissances peuvent comparaître ensemble, entrer +en contradiction, être traduites, différées, infléchies. Or c'est +précisément cette capacité qui se fragilise. La scène ne disparaît pas +absolument, mais elle cesse d'être la condition ordinaire de la +régulation mondiale. La crise géopolitique contemporaine tient donc +moins à une disparition du droit, ou à un retour pur de la force, qu'à +la désarticulation croissante entre une arcalité qui demeure, une +cratialité qui s'intensifie, et une archicration qui ne parvient plus à +faire tenir leur rapport dans une forme reconnue. La question centrale +n'est plus seulement : qui agit, qui domine, qui résiste ? Elle devient +: où et comment ces actions peuvent-elles encore comparaître comme +différend, plutôt que se déployer comme pure effectivité ? La +géopolitique cesse alors d'être seulement une distribution de +puissances. Elle devient un problème de comparution. -Cette crise de comparution se manifeste selon plusieurs figures distinctes mais liées. Il importe de les distinguer non pour dresser une typologie abstraite, mais parce que chacune fait apparaître un régime particulier d’affaiblissement archicratique, et donc une manière différente pour le conflit de sortir de la scène ou de la dévaster. +Cette crise de comparution se manifeste selon plusieurs figures +distinctes mais liées. Il importe de les distinguer non pour dresser une +typologie abstraite, mais parce que chacune fait apparaître un régime +particulier d'affaiblissement archicratique, et donc une manière +différente pour le conflit de sortir de la scène ou de la dévaster. -La première figure est celle de la destruction de la scène. Le conflit syrien en constitue une illustration paradigmatique. Ce qui s’y est joué ne relève pas seulement d’une intensification de la violence ou d’une multiplication des acteurs armés ; c’est la possibilité même d’un espace commun de comparution qui s’y est progressivement dissoute. La Syrie n’a pas seulement été le lieu d’une guerre prolongée, ni seulement celui d’interventions extérieures multiples ; elle a été le lieu où aucune forme n’a tenu assez longtemps pour que les antagonismes puissent être repris comme conflit traversable. +La première figure est celle de la destruction de la scène. Le conflit +syrien en constitue une illustration paradigmatique. Ce qui s'y est joué +ne relève pas seulement d'une intensification de la violence ou d'une +multiplication des acteurs armés ; c'est la possibilité même d'un espace +commun de comparution qui s'y est progressivement dissoute. La Syrie n'a +pas seulement été le lieu d'une guerre prolongée, ni seulement celui +d'interventions extérieures multiples ; elle a été le lieu où aucune +forme n'a tenu assez longtemps pour que les antagonismes puissent être +repris comme conflit traversable. -Les négociations, conférences et résolutions n’ont pas manqué. Ce qui a manqué, c’est un cadre assez robuste pour forcer les acteurs engagés — régime, groupes armés, puissances régionales et globales — à comparaître dans une scène qui les excède tous partiellement. Les récits se sont multipliés — guerre civile, guerre contre le terrorisme, guerre par procuration, lutte pour la souveraineté, intervention humanitaire, stabilisation régionale — sans qu’aucun ne parvienne à faire tenir ensemble violences de terrain, rationalités militaires, intérêts énergétiques et tentatives de médiation dans une forme commune. +Les négociations, conférences et résolutions n'ont pas manqué. Ce qui a +manqué, c'est un cadre assez robuste pour forcer les acteurs engagés — régime, groupes armés, puissances régionales et globales — à +comparaître dans une scène qui les excède tous partiellement. Les récits +se sont multipliés — guerre civile, guerre contre le terrorisme, +guerre par procuration, lutte pour la souveraineté, intervention +humanitaire, stabilisation régionale — sans qu'aucun ne parvienne à +faire tenir ensemble violences de terrain, rationalités militaires, +intérêts énergétiques et tentatives de médiation dans une forme commune. -Le droit n’a pas seulement été violé ; il a été empêché d’apparaître comme scène. Les résolutions ont existé, les prises de parole aussi, mais rien n’a suffi à produire un espace où la violence puisse être exposée autrement que comme flux d’événements, séquences d’atrocités, déplacements de lignes, urgences humanitaires, jeux d’alliances et d’abandons. La scène n’a pas été seulement faible. Elle a été dévastée. Et cette dévastation révèle l’une des formes les plus radicales de la crise archicratique mondiale : lorsque les puissances agissent dans un espace où aucun tiers ne parvient à imposer une forme minimale de comparution, le conflit cesse d’être habitable comme différend. Il se poursuit comme pure effectivité, c’est-à-dire comme déploiement de capacités sans théâtre reconnu. +Le droit n'a pas seulement été violé ; il a été empêché d'apparaître +comme scène. Les résolutions ont existé, les prises de parole aussi, +mais rien n'a suffi à produire un espace où la violence puisse être +exposée autrement que comme flux d'événements, séquences d'atrocités, +déplacements de lignes, urgences humanitaires, jeux d'alliances et +d'abandons. La scène n'a pas été seulement faible. Elle a été dévastée. +Et cette dévastation révèle l'une des formes les plus radicales de la +crise archicratique mondiale : lorsque les puissances agissent dans un +espace où aucun tiers ne parvient à imposer une forme minimale de +comparution, le conflit cesse d'être habitable comme différend. Il se +poursuit comme pure effectivité, c'est-à-dire comme déploiement de +capacités sans théâtre reconnu. -La deuxième figure de la crise de comparution est celle de la fragmentation concurrentielle de la scène. Le conflit russo-ukrainien en offre une configuration exemplaire. Car ici, rien ne semble manquer des conditions formelles de la comparution : institutions visibles, normes omniprésentes, catégories juridiques mobilisées, documentation abondante, qualifications précises. Tout semble indiquer que la scène tient encore. +La deuxième figure de la crise de comparution est celle de la +fragmentation concurrentielle de la scène. Le conflit russo-ukrainien en +offre une configuration exemplaire. Car ici, rien ne semble manquer des +conditions formelles de la comparution : institutions visibles, normes +omniprésentes, catégories juridiques mobilisées, documentation +abondante, qualifications précises. Tout semble indiquer que la scène +tient encore. -Et pourtant, elle ne tient pas. Ce qui se donne à voir n’est pas une absence de scène, mais une prolifération de scènes qui ne se reconnaissent pas mutuellement. D’un côté, le conflit est qualifié comme agression contre un État souverain, violation du droit international, atteinte à l’intégrité territoriale. De l’autre, il est inscrit dans un autre régime de légitimité : sécurité historique, défense contre un encerclement stratégique, correction d’un déséquilibre géopolitique plus ancien. Entre ces deux pôles se déploient d’autres cadrages encore : autodétermination, résistance nationale, conflit civilisationnel, défense contre l’expansion impériale. Les catégories ne manquent pas ; ce qui manque, c’est leur traductibilité réciproque dans une scène reconnue. +Et pourtant, elle ne tient pas. Ce qui se donne à voir n'est pas une +absence de scène, mais une prolifération de scènes qui ne se +reconnaissent pas mutuellement. D'un côté, le conflit est qualifié comme +agression contre un État souverain, violation du droit international, +atteinte à l'intégrité territoriale. De l'autre, il est inscrit dans un +autre régime de légitimité : sécurité historique, défense contre un +encerclement stratégique, correction d'un déséquilibre géopolitique plus +ancien. Entre ces deux pôles se déploient d'autres cadrages encore : +autodétermination, résistance nationale, conflit civilisationnel, +défense contre l'expansion impériale. Les catégories ne manquent pas ; +ce qui manque, c'est leur traductibilité réciproque dans une scène +reconnue. -La scène n’est donc pas absente. Elle est éclatée. Les acteurs se répondent, se citent, se dénoncent, se réfèrent aux mêmes événements, mais non dans un espace où ces réponses produiraient une obligation mutuelle de reprise. L’événement commun ne produit donc pas de scène commune ; il devient le point d’appui de qualifications concurrentes qui se renforcent mutuellement sans se laisser véritablement traverser. Chaque parole est adressée depuis un théâtre qui ne reconnaît pas pleinement celui de l’autre comme lieu valide du différend. Le conflit devient alors confrontation de scènes plutôt que conflit dans une scène. +La scène n'est donc pas absente. Elle est éclatée. Les acteurs se +répondent, se citent, se dénoncent, se réfèrent aux mêmes événements, +mais non dans un espace où ces réponses produiraient une obligation +mutuelle de reprise. L'événement commun ne produit donc pas de scène +commune ; il devient le point d'appui de qualifications concurrentes qui +se renforcent mutuellement sans se laisser véritablement traverser. +Chaque parole est adressée depuis un théâtre qui ne reconnaît pas +pleinement celui de l'autre comme lieu valide du différend. Le conflit +devient alors confrontation de scènes plutôt que conflit dans une scène. -La troisième figure est celle de la saturation simulacrale de la scène. Les négociations climatiques internationales en offrent une illustration particulièrement révélatrice. Ici, la scène n’est ni détruite ni véritablement éclatée. Elle est extraordinairement active, dense, visible, institutionnalisée, médiatisée. Elle produit des textes, des engagements, des trajectoires, des objectifs, des mécanismes de suivi. Tout semble indiquer que la régulation mondiale fonctionne. +La troisième figure est celle de la saturation simulacrale de la scène. +Les négociations climatiques internationales en offrent une illustration +particulièrement révélatrice. Ici, la scène n'est ni détruite ni +véritablement éclatée. Elle est extraordinairement active, dense, +visible, institutionnalisée, médiatisée. Elle produit des textes, des +engagements, des trajectoires, des objectifs, des mécanismes de suivi. +Tout semble indiquer que la régulation mondiale fonctionne. -Et pourtant, elle ne tient pas pleinement comme scène archicrative. Les différends y sont omniprésents — responsabilité historique, justice climatique, droit au développement, financement, adaptation, pertes et dommages — mais ils peinent structurellement à être transformés en formes réellement contraignantes et co-légitimées. La scène fonctionne, mais elle fonctionne comme saturation : elle formalise, différencie, documente, différère, sans toujours produire une transformation à la hauteur des enjeux. Elle n’est pas vide ; elle est saturée au point de perdre une part de sa capacité transformatrice. La prolifération des procédures, des engagements, des calendriers et des mécanismes de suivi ne manque pas de rationalité ; mais elle tend à convertir le dissensus en gestion continue d’un différé, plutôt qu’en mise en tension réellement contraignante des responsabilités. +Et pourtant, elle ne tient pas pleinement comme scène archicrative. Les +différends y sont omniprésents — responsabilité historique, justice +climatique, droit au développement, financement, adaptation, pertes et +dommages — mais ils peinent structurellement à être transformés en +formes réellement contraignantes et co-légitimées. La scène fonctionne, +mais elle fonctionne comme saturation : elle formalise, différencie, +documente, différère, sans toujours produire une transformation à la +hauteur des enjeux. Elle n'est pas vide ; elle est saturée au point de +perdre une part de sa capacité transformatrice. La prolifération des +procédures, des engagements, des calendriers et des mécanismes de suivi +ne manque pas de rationalité ; mais elle tend à convertir le dissensus +en gestion continue d'un différé, plutôt qu'en mise en tension +réellement contraignante des responsabilités. -Ces trois figures — destruction, fragmentation, saturation — ne sont pas des anomalies isolées. Elles constituent les régimes différenciés d’une même transformation : la perte de centralité de la scène comme condition ordinaire de la régulation internationale. Le problème n’est donc pas seulement la pluralité des puissances. Il est la pluralité des scènes. +Ces trois figures — destruction, fragmentation, saturation — ne sont +pas des anomalies isolées. Elles constituent les régimes différenciés +d'une même transformation : la perte de centralité de la scène comme +condition ordinaire de la régulation internationale. Le problème n'est +donc pas seulement la pluralité des puissances. Il est la pluralité des +scènes. -C’est à partir de cette transformation qu’il devient nécessaire de qualifier la configuration contemporaine comme une multipolarité disjonctive. La multipolarité contemporaine ne se contente pas d’ajouter des acteurs à une scène existante ; elle transforme les conditions mêmes de la scène. Les puissances ne divergent plus seulement sur les objectifs ou les moyens, mais sur les cadres dans lesquels une position peut encore être dite légitime. C’est en ce sens qu’elle est disjonctive. La disjonction ne porte donc pas seulement sur les intérêts en présence, mais sur les principes mêmes de commensurabilité qui permettraient encore de les confronter dans un langage partiellement partagé. +C'est à partir de cette transformation qu'il devient nécessaire de +qualifier la configuration contemporaine comme une multipolarité +disjonctive. La multipolarité contemporaine ne se contente pas d'ajouter +des acteurs à une scène existante ; elle transforme les conditions mêmes +de la scène. Les puissances ne divergent plus seulement sur les +objectifs ou les moyens, mais sur les cadres dans lesquels une position +peut encore être dite légitime. C'est en ce sens qu'elle est +disjonctive. La disjonction ne porte donc pas seulement sur les intérêts +en présence, mais sur les principes mêmes de commensurabilité qui +permettraient encore de les confronter dans un langage partiellement +partagé. -Cette précision est essentielle. Dans une multipolarité classique, plusieurs centres de puissance coexistent encore dans un horizon minimalement partagé : ils s’affrontent, se surveillent, se contiennent, parfois se reconnaissent, mais dans un espace où les catégories de menace, d’équilibre, de négociation et de compromis demeurent partiellement commensurables. La configuration actuelle est plus troublante. Les acteurs ne se contentent plus de défendre des intérêts différents à l’intérieur d’un même théâtre ; ils contribuent à produire des théâtres divergents, dans lesquels les critères de recevabilité eux-mêmes ne coïncident plus. Ce n’est donc pas seulement la distribution de la puissance qui se pluralise, mais la scène même de sa justification. +Cette précision est essentielle. Dans une multipolarité classique, +plusieurs centres de puissance coexistent encore dans un horizon +minimalement partagé : ils s'affrontent, se surveillent, se contiennent, +parfois se reconnaissent, mais dans un espace où les catégories de +menace, d'équilibre, de négociation et de compromis demeurent +partiellement commensurables. La configuration actuelle est plus +troublante. Les acteurs ne se contentent plus de défendre des intérêts +différents à l'intérieur d'un même théâtre ; ils contribuent à produire +des théâtres divergents, dans lesquels les critères de recevabilité +eux-mêmes ne coïncident plus. Ce n'est donc pas seulement la +distribution de la puissance qui se pluralise, mais la scène même de sa +justification. -Il en résulte une transformation profonde de la conflictualité internationale. Lorsque les cadres de légitimation se désarticulent, le différend ne porte plus seulement sur ce qu’il convient de faire, mais sur la scène à partir de laquelle une action peut être dite défensive, illégitime, proportionnée, impériale, réparatrice ou prédatrice. La rivalité n’oppose plus uniquement des stratégies ; elle oppose des économies de validation. Les acteurs ne se disputent pas seulement des zones, des flux, des ressources ou des alliances ; ils se disputent les conditions sous lesquelles leur propre parole peut encore prétendre à l’universalité. C’est pourquoi la multipolarité contemporaine ne produit pas spontanément une scène plus riche : elle peut engendrer au contraire un monde plus peuplé en voix, mais moins capable d’en faire une conflictualité tenue. +Il en résulte une transformation profonde de la conflictualité +internationale. Lorsque les cadres de légitimation se désarticulent, le +différend ne porte plus seulement sur ce qu'il convient de faire, mais +sur la scène à partir de laquelle une action peut être dite défensive, +illégitime, proportionnée, impériale, réparatrice ou prédatrice. La +rivalité n'oppose plus uniquement des stratégies ; elle oppose des +économies de validation. Les acteurs ne se disputent pas seulement des +zones, des flux, des ressources ou des alliances ; ils se disputent les +conditions sous lesquelles leur propre parole peut encore prétendre à +l'universalité. C'est pourquoi la multipolarité contemporaine ne produit +pas spontanément une scène plus riche : elle peut engendrer au contraire +un monde plus peuplé en voix, mais moins capable d'en faire une +conflictualité tenue. -Le conflit sino-américain en constitue l’une des expressions les plus structurantes. Il ne porte pas seulement sur le commerce, la technologie ou la stratégie militaire ; il engage des conceptions divergentes de la souveraineté, du rôle de l’État, du statut des droits, du gouvernement du numérique, des rapports entre sécurité et liberté, entre ordre et pluralité. Ce qui est invoqué comme principe universel d’un côté peut être disqualifié de l’autre comme instrument de puissance, projection d’un modèle particulier ou masque idéologique. Le différend porte donc moins sur l’application des normes que sur la scène dans laquelle ces normes pourraient être reconnues comme valides. +Le conflit sino-américain en constitue l'une des expressions les plus +structurantes. Il ne porte pas seulement sur le commerce, la technologie +ou la stratégie militaire ; il engage des conceptions divergentes de la +souveraineté, du rôle de l'État, du statut des droits, du gouvernement +du numérique, des rapports entre sécurité et liberté, entre ordre et +pluralité. Ce qui est invoqué comme principe universel d'un côté peut +être disqualifié de l'autre comme instrument de puissance, projection +d'un modèle particulier ou masque idéologique. Le différend porte donc +moins sur l'application des normes que sur la scène dans laquelle ces +normes pourraient être reconnues comme valides. -Une dynamique comparable traverse ce que l’on désigne, de manière imparfaite mais opératoire, comme le “Sud global”. Il ne s’y exprime pas seulement une demande de redistribution du pouvoir international, mais une contestation des cadres à partir desquels ce pouvoir est pensé et légitimé. Les références à l’histoire coloniale, aux asymétries structurelles, aux doubles standards normatifs et à l’inégale valeur des vies déplacent le différend du contenu des décisions vers la légitimité même du lieu d’où elles sont prises. Ce déplacement est décisif : il ne conteste pas seulement des décisions particulières, mais l’économie historique de recevabilité dans laquelle certaines puissances continuent de parler comme si elles occupaient naturellement le centre de la scène mondiale. La contestation ne porte pas seulement sur ce qui est décidé ; elle porte sur le lieu d’où cela est décidé. +Une dynamique comparable traverse ce que l'on désigne, de manière +imparfaite mais opératoire, comme le "Sud global". Il ne s'y exprime pas +seulement une demande de redistribution du pouvoir international, mais +une contestation des cadres à partir desquels ce pouvoir est pensé et +légitimé. Les références à l'histoire coloniale, aux asymétries +structurelles, aux doubles standards normatifs et à l'inégale valeur des +vies déplacent le différend du contenu des décisions vers la légitimité +même du lieu d'où elles sont prises. Ce déplacement est décisif : il ne +conteste pas seulement des décisions particulières, mais l'économie +historique de recevabilité dans laquelle certaines puissances continuent +de parler comme si elles occupaient naturellement le centre de la scène +mondiale. La contestation ne porte pas seulement sur ce qui est décidé ; +elle porte sur le lieu d'où cela est décidé. -C’est à partir de là qu’il devient possible de formaliser ce que l’on peut appeler une polyphonie des légitimités. Plusieurs voix prétendent organiser le monde ; plusieurs récits du droit, de la justice, de la souveraineté, de la sécurité ou du développement coexistent. Mais cette pluralité ne produit pas spontanément une scène plus riche. Elle peut au contraire engendrer une fragmentation dans laquelle chaque voix parle depuis son propre théâtre sans reconnaître pleinement celui des autres comme espace valable du différend. La polyphonie n’est pas silence ; elle est excès de voix sans orchestration commune. La tension géopolitique contemporaine apparaît ainsi comme une tension entre pluralisation et disjonction : le monde ne manque ni de normes, ni de puissance, ni de récits, mais il peine à produire une scène capable de les faire tenir ensemble autrement que dans leur coexistence conflictuelle. +C'est à partir de là qu'il devient possible de formaliser ce que l'on +peut appeler une polyphonie des légitimités. Plusieurs voix prétendent +organiser le monde ; plusieurs récits du droit, de la justice, de la +souveraineté, de la sécurité ou du développement coexistent. Mais cette +pluralité ne produit pas spontanément une scène plus riche. Elle peut au +contraire engendrer une fragmentation dans laquelle chaque voix parle +depuis son propre théâtre sans reconnaître pleinement celui des autres +comme espace valable du différend. La polyphonie n'est pas silence ; +elle est excès de voix sans orchestration commune. La tension +géopolitique contemporaine apparaît ainsi comme une tension entre +pluralisation et disjonction : le monde ne manque ni de normes, ni de +puissance, ni de récits, mais il peine à produire une scène capable de +les faire tenir ensemble autrement que dans leur coexistence +conflictuelle. -Mais la désarticulation entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration ne se manifeste pas seulement dans la fragmentation des scènes visibles. Une part croissante des tensions géopolitiques se joue désormais dans les infrastructures : énergie, semi-conducteurs, données, routes maritimes, câbles sous-marins, systèmes de paiement, chaînes logistiques, satellites, minerais critiques. Le conflit n’y disparaît pas ; il s’y reconfigure dans un langage fonctionnel de sécurisation, de résilience, de continuité d’approvisionnement et de réduction du risque. On parle dans les enceintes diplomatiques ; on agit dans les infrastructures. Le conflit ne s’y absente pas ; il change de régime d’apparition, en se déposant dans des décisions techniques, logistiques ou réglementaires qui modifient le réel avant même d’avoir été pleinement reconnues comme moments de confrontation. +Mais la désarticulation entre arcalité, cratialité et archicration ne se +manifeste pas seulement dans la fragmentation des scènes visibles. Une +part croissante des tensions géopolitiques se joue désormais dans les +infrastructures : énergie, semi-conducteurs, données, routes maritimes, +câbles sous-marins, systèmes de paiement, chaînes logistiques, +satellites, minerais critiques. Le conflit n'y disparaît pas ; il s'y +reconfigure dans un langage fonctionnel de sécurisation, de résilience, +de continuité d'approvisionnement et de réduction du risque. On parle +dans les enceintes diplomatiques ; on agit dans les infrastructures. Le +conflit ne s'y absente pas ; il change de régime d'apparition, en se +déposant dans des décisions techniques, logistiques ou réglementaires +qui modifient le réel avant même d'avoir été pleinement reconnues comme +moments de confrontation. -Ce déplacement a des conséquences profondes. Une restriction d’exportation, une reconfiguration de chaîne logistique, une exclusion d’un système de paiement, un contrôle sur des technologies critiques, un repositionnement de routes commerciales peuvent avoir des effets géopolitiques majeurs sans passer par une scène explicite de comparution. La géopolitique devient alors partiellement infra-scénique : elle se joue en dessous, en amont ou à côté des espaces où elle prétend se dire. Le conflit n’est pas moins intense ; il est plus difficile à faire apparaître comme différend habitable. +Ce déplacement a des conséquences profondes. Une restriction +d'exportation, une reconfiguration de chaîne logistique, une exclusion +d'un système de paiement, un contrôle sur des technologies critiques, un +repositionnement de routes commerciales peuvent avoir des effets +géopolitiques majeurs sans passer par une scène explicite de +comparution. La géopolitique devient alors partiellement infra-scénique +: elle se joue en dessous, en amont ou à côté des espaces où elle +prétend se dire. Le conflit n'est pas moins intense ; il est plus +difficile à faire apparaître comme différend habitable. -Dans ce contexte, les formats minilatéraux se développent avec une intensité particulière. Coalitions ad hoc, clubs d’États, partenariats stratégiques restreints, accords sectoriels permettent d’agir rapidement là où la grande scène universelle ne produit plus de décision opératoire. Il faut être juste avec ces dispositifs : ils peuvent rendre possible ce que les enceintes plus vastes ne parviennent plus à produire. Mais cette efficacité a un prix. Ils règlent sans toujours instituer. Ils stabilisent sans pleinement légitimer. Ils produisent du gouvernable là où l’universel échoue, mais au prix d’une contraction de la comparution. Leur efficacité n’est donc pas illusoire ; elle est archicratiquement coûteuse, parce qu’elle obtient souvent de l’opérabilité en réduisant l’épaisseur même de la scène où cette opérabilité pourrait être discutée. La géopolitique devient alors une mosaïque d’arènes : certaines visibles et institutionnelles, d’autres techniques et distribuées, d’autres encore restreintes et pragmatiques. Ce morcellement n’abolit pas la régulation ; il en modifie la forme. +Dans ce contexte, les formats minilatéraux se développent avec une +intensité particulière. Coalitions ad hoc, clubs d'États, partenariats +stratégiques restreints, accords sectoriels permettent d'agir rapidement +là où la grande scène universelle ne produit plus de décision +opératoire. Il faut être juste avec ces dispositifs : ils peuvent rendre +possible ce que les enceintes plus vastes ne parviennent plus à +produire. Mais cette efficacité a un prix. Ils règlent sans toujours +instituer. Ils stabilisent sans pleinement légitimer. Ils produisent du +gouvernable là où l'universel échoue, mais au prix d'une contraction de +la comparution. Leur efficacité n'est donc pas illusoire ; elle est +archicratiquement coûteuse, parce qu'elle obtient souvent de +l'opérabilité en réduisant l'épaisseur même de la scène où cette +opérabilité pourrait être discutée. La géopolitique devient alors une +mosaïque d'arènes : certaines visibles et institutionnelles, d'autres +techniques et distribuées, d'autres encore restreintes et pragmatiques. +Ce morcellement n'abolit pas la régulation ; il en modifie la forme. -Ce déplacement est capital, car il modifie jusqu’à l’expérience même du conflit international. Dans les grandes scènes diplomatiques, la conflictualité se présente encore sous forme de déclarations, de votes, de veto, de résolutions, d’allocutions, bref sous des formes où la parole conserve au moins la mémoire d’une comparution. Dans les infrastructures et les formats restreints, elle change de texture. Elle devient restriction de flux, redéploiement d’itinéraires, sécurisation d’un détroit, contrôle de composants critiques, reconfiguration d’une chaîne d’approvisionnement, priorisation d’un accès, verrouillage d’un standard. Le conflit ne s’y annonce pas toujours comme conflit ; il se dépose dans des opérations techniques qui en modulent silencieusement les effets. +Ce déplacement est capital, car il modifie jusqu'à l'expérience même du +conflit international. Dans les grandes scènes diplomatiques, la +conflictualité se présente encore sous forme de déclarations, de votes, +de veto, de résolutions, d'allocutions, bref sous des formes où la +parole conserve au moins la mémoire d'une comparution. Dans les +infrastructures et les formats restreints, elle change de texture. Elle +devient restriction de flux, redéploiement d'itinéraires, sécurisation +d'un détroit, contrôle de composants critiques, reconfiguration d'une +chaîne d'approvisionnement, priorisation d'un accès, verrouillage d'un +standard. Le conflit ne s'y annonce pas toujours comme conflit ; il se +dépose dans des opérations techniques qui en modulent silencieusement +les effets. -C’est pourquoi le minilatéral n’est pas seulement une solution de rechange face à l’impuissance de l’universel. Il est aussi le symptôme d’un monde où l’effectivité tend à se déplacer vers des scènes plus étroites, plus sélectives, plus opérationnelles, mais aussi moins exposées. Ce que ces formats gagnent en vitesse, ils le perdent souvent en profondeur archicrative. Ils permettent à certains acteurs de répondre rapidement à une urgence ou à une menace, mais ils peinent davantage à produire un espace où ceux qui subiront les effets indirects de ces décisions pourront réellement comparaître. À mesure que croît leur centralité, la scène mondiale cesse moins d’exister qu’elle ne se trouve court-circuitée par une pluralité de centres d’opération partielle. +C'est pourquoi le minilatéral n'est pas seulement une solution de +rechange face à l'impuissance de l'universel. Il est aussi le symptôme +d'un monde où l'effectivité tend à se déplacer vers des scènes plus +étroites, plus sélectives, plus opérationnelles, mais aussi moins +exposées. Ce que ces formats gagnent en vitesse, ils le perdent souvent +en profondeur archicrative. Ils permettent à certains acteurs de +répondre rapidement à une urgence ou à une menace, mais ils peinent +davantage à produire un espace où ceux qui subiront les effets indirects +de ces décisions pourront réellement comparaître. À mesure que croît +leur centralité, la scène mondiale cesse moins d'exister qu'elle ne se +trouve court-circuitée par une pluralité de centres d'opération +partielle. -Et c’est précisément dans cet espace fracturé que réapparaissent, de manière inattendue, des formes faibles de scène. Certaines juridictions symboliques ou périphériques en offrent des exemples significatifs. Le Tribunal Monsanto, malgré son absence de pouvoir contraignant, a tenté d’ouvrir un espace où des pratiques industrielles pouvaient être exposées comme litige global. Des procès climatiques intentés contre des États ou des entreprises ne visent pas seulement des réparations ; ils cherchent aussi à instituer une adresse, à produire un lieu où des responsabilités puissent être nommées, documentées, discutées. Certaines juridictions régionales ont également introduit des formes de reconnaissance qui excèdent les cadres classiques, en rendant comparables des régimes d’existence jusque-là maintenus à la périphérie des scènes officielles. +Et c'est précisément dans cet espace fracturé que réapparaissent, de +manière inattendue, des formes faibles de scène. Certaines juridictions +symboliques ou périphériques en offrent des exemples significatifs. Le +Tribunal Monsanto, malgré son absence de pouvoir contraignant, a tenté +d'ouvrir un espace où des pratiques industrielles pouvaient être +exposées comme litige global. Des procès climatiques intentés contre des +États ou des entreprises ne visent pas seulement des réparations ; ils +cherchent aussi à instituer une adresse, à produire un lieu où des +responsabilités puissent être nommées, documentées, discutées. Certaines +juridictions régionales ont également introduit des formes de +reconnaissance qui excèdent les cadres classiques, en rendant +comparables des régimes d'existence jusque-là maintenus à la périphérie +des scènes officielles. -Le territoire lui-même devient un lieu privilégié de réémergence archicratique. Non pas le territoire au seul sens étatique, mais comme forme habitée, espace de vie, configuration relationnelle. Les luttes autochtones, écologiques ou communautaires montrent que la scène peut se reconstituer à partir du sol, à travers des assemblées, des rituels, des protocoles de reconnaissance, des juridictions coutumières, des formes de blocage ou de résistance. Ces pratiques ne valent pas seulement comme actions politiques ; elles valent comme institutions fragiles du différend. Leur fragilité ne retire rien à leur portée analytique : elle montre au contraire que, là même où la grande scène mondiale se défait, des formes situées de comparution peuvent encore être instituées à bas bruit. +Le territoire lui-même devient un lieu privilégié de réémergence +archicratique. Non pas le territoire au seul sens étatique, mais comme +forme habitée, espace de vie, configuration relationnelle. Les luttes +autochtones, écologiques ou communautaires montrent que la scène peut se +reconstituer à partir du sol, à travers des assemblées, des rituels, des +protocoles de reconnaissance, des juridictions coutumières, des formes +de blocage ou de résistance. Ces pratiques ne valent pas seulement comme +actions politiques ; elles valent comme institutions fragiles du +différend. Leur fragilité ne retire rien à leur portée analytique : elle +montre au contraire que, là même où la grande scène mondiale se défait, +des formes situées de comparution peuvent encore être instituées à bas +bruit. -Ces scènes sont faibles, mais décisives. Elles n’abolissent ni la fragmentation ni l’asymétrie des puissances ; elles indiquent seulement que la disputabilité n’est pas entièrement dissoute. La géopolitique contemporaine ne se réduit donc ni à la disparition de la scène, ni à son maintien inchangé, mais à une stratification de scènes inégalement puissantes, partiellement articulées, souvent disjointes. L’enjeu n’est plus de restaurer un ordre homogène, mais de maintenir des espaces où le conflit puisse encore être tenu autrement que comme pure force ou juxtaposition de légitimités closes. +Ces scènes sont faibles, mais décisives. Elles n'abolissent ni la +fragmentation ni l'asymétrie des puissances ; elles indiquent seulement +que la disputabilité n'est pas entièrement dissoute. La géopolitique +contemporaine ne se réduit donc ni à la disparition de la scène, ni à +son maintien inchangé, mais à une stratification de scènes inégalement +puissantes, partiellement articulées, souvent disjointes. L'enjeu n'est +plus de restaurer un ordre homogène, mais de maintenir des espaces où le +conflit puisse encore être tenu autrement que comme pure force ou +juxtaposition de légitimités closes. -C’est en ce sens qu’il faut comprendre l’archicration géopolitique. Non comme promesse d’un consensus universel enfin accompli, ni comme restauration imaginaire d’un ordre mondial homogène, mais comme exigence plus sobre et plus décisive : maintenir des conditions dans lesquelles le conflit puisse encore comparaître autrement que comme pure force, pure fragmentation ou pure gestion d’effectivités concurrentes. À ce niveau, l’enjeu n’est pas de supprimer l’hétérogénéité du monde, mais d’empêcher qu’elle ne bascule tout entière dans l’incommensurabilité ou dans la seule administration stratégique des rapports de puissance. Ce qui est en jeu aujourd’hui n’est pas seulement l’intensification des tensions, mais la difficulté croissante à instituer des formes où elles puissent être reprises, traduites, différées, exposées, autrement dit rendues travaillables sans être ni dissoutes ni abandonnées à la seule logique des rapports de puissance. +C'est en ce sens qu'il faut comprendre l'archicration géopolitique. Non +comme promesse d'un consensus universel enfin accompli, ni comme +restauration imaginaire d'un ordre mondial homogène, mais comme exigence +plus sobre et plus décisive : maintenir des conditions dans lesquelles +le conflit puisse encore comparaître autrement que comme pure force, +pure fragmentation ou pure gestion d'effectivités concurrentes. À ce +niveau, l'enjeu n'est pas de supprimer l'hétérogénéité du monde, mais +d'empêcher qu'elle ne bascule tout entière dans l'incommensurabilité ou +dans la seule administration stratégique des rapports de puissance. Ce +qui est en jeu aujourd'hui n'est pas seulement l'intensification des +tensions, mais la difficulté croissante à instituer des formes où elles +puissent être reprises, traduites, différées, exposées, autrement dit +rendues travaillables sans être ni dissoutes ni abandonnées à la seule +logique des rapports de puissance. -Une telle exigence n’abolit ni l’asymétrie des acteurs, ni la violence du monde, ni l’hétérogénéité des régimes de légitimité. Elle ne promet pas davantage qu’une scène totale pourrait enfin absorber toutes les conflictualités de la planète. Elle désigne quelque chose de plus rigoureux et de plus fragile : la nécessité qu’existent encore, entre destruction de la scène, éclatement des cadres, saturation procédurale, déplacement infra-scénique et contraction minilatérale, des seuils où la force doive au moins partiellement répondre d’elle-même. Car à défaut de tels seuils, la géopolitique cesse d’être seulement un ordre conflictuel ; elle devient un espace où les puissances agissent de plus en plus sans avoir à se soumettre à l’épreuve d’un monde commun. +Une telle exigence n'abolit ni l'asymétrie des acteurs, ni la violence +du monde, ni l'hétérogénéité des régimes de légitimité. Elle ne promet +pas davantage qu'une scène totale pourrait enfin absorber toutes les +conflictualités de la planète. Elle désigne quelque chose de plus +rigoureux et de plus fragile : la nécessité qu'existent encore, entre +destruction de la scène, éclatement des cadres, saturation procédurale, +déplacement infra-scénique et contraction minilatérale, des seuils où la +force doive au moins partiellement répondre d'elle-même. Car à défaut de +tels seuils, la géopolitique cesse d'être seulement un ordre conflictuel +; elle devient un espace où les puissances agissent de plus en plus sans +avoir à se soumettre à l'épreuve d'un monde commun. -C’est pourquoi la question géopolitique ne peut plus être formulée seulement en termes de distribution des puissances, d’équilibres stratégiques ou d’architecture institutionnelle. Elle doit être reformulée comme question des conditions de comparution à l’échelle mondiale. Où le différend peut-il encore prendre forme ? Dans quels cadres les conflits peuvent-ils être nommés sans être aussitôt reconduits à des théâtres incommensurables ? Quelles scènes, mêmes faibles, mêmes situées, mêmes partielles, permettent encore qu’une violence, une dépendance, une dépossession ou une destruction soient portées à hauteur d’objection recevable ? +C'est pourquoi la question géopolitique ne peut plus être formulée +seulement en termes de distribution des puissances, d'équilibres +stratégiques ou d'architecture institutionnelle. Elle doit être +reformulée comme question des conditions de comparution à l'échelle +mondiale. Où le différend peut-il encore prendre forme ? Dans quels +cadres les conflits peuvent-ils être nommés sans être aussitôt +reconduits à des théâtres incommensurables ? Quelles scènes, mêmes +faibles, mêmes situées, mêmes partielles, permettent encore qu'une +violence, une dépendance, une dépossession ou une destruction soient +portées à hauteur d'objection recevable ? -Et c’est à partir de cette limite qu’un déplacement décisif s’impose. Car si la géopolitique interroge encore la possibilité d’une scène entre puissances, une question plus radicale s’ouvre déjà en son sein : celle des conditions d’apparition des sujets eux-mêmes dans ces scènes. Non plus seulement : qui agit dans le monde ? Mais : qui peut y comparaître comme interlocuteur recevable, comme vie comptée, comme expérience digne d’être portée à la scène ? La crise géopolitique ne se limite donc pas à une crise de l’ordre international. Elle devient une crise des seuils d’apparition. Car lorsqu’aucune scène suffisamment reconnue ne garantit plus que les vies affectées puissent accéder à une forme recevable de comparution, la question de la conflictualité entre puissances se redouble immédiatement d’une question plus radicale : celle des conditions mêmes de l’apparition. C’est à ce point précis que s’ouvre la tension suivante. +Et c'est à partir de cette limite qu'un déplacement décisif s'impose. +Car si la géopolitique interroge encore la possibilité d'une scène entre +puissances, une question plus radicale s'ouvre déjà en son sein : celle +des conditions d'apparition des sujets eux-mêmes dans ces scènes. Non +plus seulement : qui agit dans le monde ? Mais : qui peut y comparaître +comme interlocuteur recevable, comme vie comptée, comme expérience digne +d'être portée à la scène ? La crise géopolitique ne se limite donc pas à +une crise de l'ordre international. Elle devient une crise des seuils +d'apparition. Car lorsqu'aucune scène suffisamment reconnue ne garantit +plus que les vies affectées puissent accéder à une forme recevable de +comparution, la question de la conflictualité entre puissances se +redouble immédiatement d'une question plus radicale : celle des +conditions mêmes de l'apparition. C'est à ce point précis que s'ouvre la +tension suivante. ## 5.9 — Tensions cosmopolitiques : sujets, scènes et universalités disputables -Depuis plusieurs années déjà, des communautés entières savent qu’elles ne pourront pas demeurer là où elles vivent. Ce savoir n’a pas toujours la brutalité d’une catastrophe instantanée. Il ne prend pas nécessairement la forme d’un effondrement unique, datable, spectaculaire. Il avance plus bas, plus lentement, plus obstinément. La terre retient moins l’eau. Les saisons dérivent. Les récoltes deviennent incertaines. Les cycles halieutiques se défont. Les sols se fissurent ou se salinisent. Les incendies se rapprochent. La côte recule. Les nappes s’épuisent. L’extraction progresse. Les forêts cessent d’abriter ce qu’elles abritaient encore. Les maisons tiennent parfois debout. Les routes existent encore. Les cartes officielles ne signalent pas immédiatement qu’un monde a commencé à manquer. Et pourtant, ce qui faisait continuité se défait. Les usages, les transmissions, les repères, les rythmes, les formes élémentaires de prévisibilité grâce auxquelles une existence se savait encore située cessent de tenir ensemble avec la même évidence. Il arrive alors un moment où rester ne signifie plus habiter, mais s’exposer ; et où partir n’ouvre pas un avenir, mais commence par une perte. +Depuis plusieurs années déjà, des communautés entières savent qu'elles +ne pourront pas demeurer là où elles vivent. Ce savoir n'a pas toujours +la brutalité d'une catastrophe instantanée. Il ne prend pas +nécessairement la forme d'un effondrement unique, datable, +spectaculaire. Il avance plus bas, plus lentement, plus obstinément. La +terre retient moins l'eau. Les saisons dérivent. Les récoltes deviennent +incertaines. Les cycles halieutiques se défont. Les sols se fissurent ou +se salinisent. Les incendies se rapprochent. La côte recule. Les nappes +s'épuisent. L'extraction progresse. Les forêts cessent d'abriter ce +qu'elles abritaient encore. Les maisons tiennent parfois debout. Les +routes existent encore. Les cartes officielles ne signalent pas +immédiatement qu'un monde a commencé à manquer. Et pourtant, ce qui +faisait continuité se défait. Les usages, les transmissions, les +repères, les rythmes, les formes élémentaires de prévisibilité grâce +auxquelles une existence se savait encore située cessent de tenir +ensemble avec la même évidence. Il arrive alors un moment où rester ne +signifie plus habiter, mais s'exposer ; et où partir n'ouvre pas un +avenir, mais commence par une perte. -Lorsqu’un tel seuil est franchi, ce qui se joue alors n’est pas réductible à un déplacement de population, à un dommage environnemental ou à une crise humanitaire de plus. C’est la possibilité même de faire reconnaître ce qui arrive. Car ceux dont le territoire devient inhabitable, ceux dont le milieu de vie est lentement détruit, ceux dont la continuité symbolique, économique, matérielle ou cosmologique se trouve atteinte ne cherchent pas seulement à survivre. Ils cherchent aussi à dire le tort qui leur est fait. Ils cherchent à le formuler de telle manière qu’il ne se dissolve ni dans la fatalité naturelle, ni dans l’indifférence administrative, ni dans des langages trop pauvres qui ne savent recevoir que du dommage quantifiable. Ils cherchent la forme dans laquelle leur tort cessera d’être un fait pour devenir un différend. +Lorsqu'un tel seuil est franchi, ce qui se joue alors n'est pas +réductible à un déplacement de population, à un dommage environnemental +ou à une crise humanitaire de plus. C'est la possibilité même de faire +reconnaître ce qui arrive. Car ceux dont le territoire devient +inhabitable, ceux dont le milieu de vie est lentement détruit, ceux dont +la continuité symbolique, économique, matérielle ou cosmologique se +trouve atteinte ne cherchent pas seulement à survivre. Ils cherchent +aussi à dire le tort qui leur est fait. Ils cherchent à le formuler de +telle manière qu'il ne se dissolve ni dans la fatalité naturelle, ni +dans l'indifférence administrative, ni dans des langages trop pauvres +qui ne savent recevoir que du dommage quantifiable. Ils cherchent la +forme dans laquelle leur tort cessera d'être un fait pour devenir un +différend. -Or c’est ici que commence la difficulté proprement cosmopolitique. Les cadres disponibles ne manquent pas : instances, procédures, expertises, conventions, juridictions, dispositifs de plainte, arènes internationales où les souffrances du monde peuvent, en principe, être portées. Pourtant, au moment même où un collectif tente de nommer ce qu’il subit, il découvre souvent que les formes de recevabilité qui lui sont offertes ne savent pas recevoir ce qu’il cherche à faire entendre. +Or c'est ici que commence la difficulté proprement cosmopolitique. Les +cadres disponibles ne manquent pas : instances, procédures, expertises, +conventions, juridictions, dispositifs de plainte, arènes +internationales où les souffrances du monde peuvent, en principe, être +portées. Pourtant, au moment même où un collectif tente de nommer ce +qu'il subit, il découvre souvent que les formes de recevabilité qui lui +sont offertes ne savent pas recevoir ce qu'il cherche à faire entendre. -La destruction d’un territoire devient risque mesurable ; la rupture d’un monde vécu, vulnérabilité objectivable ; l’atteinte à une continuité de vie, à une mémoire, à une relation au sol doit se convertir en indicateurs, en causalités, en standards de preuve. Pour pouvoir comparaître, l’expérience doit se traduire, et cette traduction n’est pas un simple passage de langue : elle reconfigure ce qui est vécu. Ce qui relevait d’un rapport au monde doit être reformulé dans une grammaire qui ne l’a pas vu naître. Les sujets concernés ne sont pas purement et simplement rejetés hors du cadre ; ils peuvent entrer dans la procédure, témoigner, alerter, comparaître, mais souvent à condition de reformuler leur tort dans des formes qui en déplacent déjà la portée. +La destruction d'un territoire devient risque mesurable ; la rupture +d'un monde vécu, vulnérabilité objectivable ; l'atteinte à une +continuité de vie, à une mémoire, à une relation au sol doit se +convertir en indicateurs, en causalités, en standards de preuve. Pour +pouvoir comparaître, l'expérience doit se traduire, et cette traduction +n'est pas un simple passage de langue : elle reconfigure ce qui est +vécu. Ce qui relevait d'un rapport au monde doit être reformulé dans une +grammaire qui ne l'a pas vu naître. Les sujets concernés ne sont pas +purement et simplement rejetés hors du cadre ; ils peuvent entrer dans +la procédure, témoigner, alerter, comparaître, mais souvent à condition +de reformuler leur tort dans des formes qui en déplacent déjà la portée. -C’est à partir de cette dissymétrie qu’il faut reprendre la question cosmopolitique. Nous ne manquons ni de droits, ni de conventions, ni de discours sur l’humanité ; nous manquons des formes par lesquelles une existence affectée par des processus globaux peut franchir le seuil qui la sépare encore de sa propre recevabilité. Le cosmopolitique doit donc être pensé moins comme horizon d’unification morale que comme problème de scène. Non pas scène unifiée, harmonieuse, pacifiée, mais structure d’apparition où un tort devient formulable et transmissible sans être immédiatement neutralisé par les conditions mêmes de sa reconnaissance. +C'est à partir de cette dissymétrie qu'il faut reprendre la question +cosmopolitique. Nous ne manquons ni de droits, ni de conventions, ni de +discours sur l'humanité ; nous manquons des formes par lesquelles une +existence affectée par des processus globaux peut franchir le seuil qui +la sépare encore de sa propre recevabilité. Le cosmopolitique doit donc +être pensé moins comme horizon d'unification morale que comme problème +de scène. Non pas scène unifiée, harmonieuse, pacifiée, mais structure +d'apparition où un tort devient formulable et transmissible sans être +immédiatement neutralisé par les conditions mêmes de sa reconnaissance. -Cette reformulation oblige à déplacer profondément le regard. Tant que le cosmopolitique est pensé comme simple extension des principes universels, le problème semble résider dans leur insuffisante application. Mais dès qu’il est repris comme problème de scène, la difficulté change de nature : il ne s’agit plus seulement de savoir quels droits devraient valoir pour tous, mais dans quelles conditions concrètes un tort peut franchir le seuil qui le sépare encore de sa propre intelligibilité publique. L’universel cesse alors d’apparaître comme un contenu déjà disponible, suspendu au-dessus des situations, pour devenir une épreuve de formulation, de transmission et de comparution. Ce déplacement importe au plus haut point, car il interdit de confondre l’existence de principes avec celle de scènes capables de les rendre réellement opérants pour ceux qui cherchent à y faire entrer leur expérience. +Cette reformulation oblige à déplacer profondément le regard. Tant que +le cosmopolitique est pensé comme simple extension des principes +universels, le problème semble résider dans leur insuffisante +application. Mais dès qu'il est repris comme problème de scène, la +difficulté change de nature : il ne s'agit plus seulement de savoir +quels droits devraient valoir pour tous, mais dans quelles conditions +concrètes un tort peut franchir le seuil qui le sépare encore de sa +propre intelligibilité publique. L'universel cesse alors d'apparaître +comme un contenu déjà disponible, suspendu au-dessus des situations, +pour devenir une épreuve de formulation, de transmission et de +comparution. Ce déplacement importe au plus haut point, car il interdit +de confondre l'existence de principes avec celle de scènes capables de +les rendre réellement opérants pour ceux qui cherchent à y faire entrer +leur expérience. -Le paradoxe contemporain devient alors plus net. Jamais les interdépendances n’ont été aussi denses : chaînes logistiques, régimes extractifs, architectures numériques, bouleversements climatiques, pandémies, flux migratoires, recompositions géopolitiques lient les existences à une intensité inédite. Mais cette liaison ne produit pas une scène commune. Elle produit une exposition distribuée : co-affectation sans co-présence recevable, proximité causale sans comparution partagée, mondialisation des effets sans universalisation des scènes. Le problème ne porte donc pas d’abord sur l’inclusion ou l’exclusion, mais sur les seuils mêmes de recevabilité. Nombre de sujets affectés par des processus globaux ne sont pas simplement rejetés hors de toute forme ; ils sont admis sous condition. Ils sont entendus, mais selon des formats qui précèdent leur parole. +Le paradoxe contemporain devient alors plus net. Jamais les +interdépendances n'ont été aussi denses : chaînes logistiques, régimes +extractifs, architectures numériques, bouleversements climatiques, +pandémies, flux migratoires, recompositions géopolitiques lient les +existences à une intensité inédite. Mais cette liaison ne produit pas +une scène commune. Elle produit une exposition distribuée : +co-affectation sans co-présence recevable, proximité causale sans +comparution partagée, mondialisation des effets sans universalisation +des scènes. Le problème ne porte donc pas d'abord sur l'inclusion ou +l'exclusion, mais sur les seuils mêmes de recevabilité. Nombre de sujets +affectés par des processus globaux ne sont pas simplement rejetés hors +de toute forme ; ils sont admis sous condition. Ils sont entendus, mais +selon des formats qui précèdent leur parole. -Un demandeur d’asile peut être reçu, mais il doit apprendre à raconter sa vie dans les catégories du persécuté crédible. Un mineur non accompagné peut prétendre à une protection, mais seulement après avoir traversé des épreuves de preuve qui l’installent d’emblée sous soupçon. Un peuple autochtone peut contester une destruction territoriale, mais à condition de traduire un rapport cosmologique au sol dans la langue des titres, des dommages et des expertises. La scène ne ferme pas frontalement la parole ; elle en règle les conditions d’accès. Avant que le tort ne puisse apparaître, il faut établir que celui qui parle est en droit d’être entendu. La comparution est ainsi précédée d’une opération de validation : le sujet n’entre pas comme interlocuteur d’emblée reconnu, mais comme hypothèse à instruire. +Un demandeur d'asile peut être reçu, mais il doit apprendre à raconter +sa vie dans les catégories du persécuté crédible. Un mineur non +accompagné peut prétendre à une protection, mais seulement après avoir +traversé des épreuves de preuve qui l'installent d'emblée sous soupçon. +Un peuple autochtone peut contester une destruction territoriale, mais à +condition de traduire un rapport cosmologique au sol dans la langue des +titres, des dommages et des expertises. La scène ne ferme pas +frontalement la parole ; elle en règle les conditions d'accès. Avant que +le tort ne puisse apparaître, il faut établir que celui qui parle est en +droit d'être entendu. La comparution est ainsi précédée d'une opération +de validation : le sujet n'entre pas comme interlocuteur d'emblée +reconnu, mais comme hypothèse à instruire. -C’est ce régime qu’il faut nommer avec précision : une comparution probatoire. Le sujet n’est pas réduit au silence ; il est mis à l’épreuve. Et cette mise à l’épreuve ne constitue pas une simple étape procédurale : elle redéfinit la structure même de l’apparition. Ce qui devrait être premier — l’exposition d’un tort — devient second ; ce qui devient premier, c’est la recevabilité de celui qui le porte. On le voit avec une netteté particulière dans les scènes d’asile. Un récit commence ; il pourrait être celui d’une fuite, d’une persécution, d’un monde devenu impraticable. +C'est ce régime qu'il faut nommer avec précision : une comparution +probatoire. Le sujet n'est pas réduit au silence ; il est mis à +l'épreuve. Et cette mise à l'épreuve ne constitue pas une simple étape +procédurale : elle redéfinit la structure même de l'apparition. Ce qui +devrait être premier — l'exposition d'un tort — devient second ; ce +qui devient premier, c'est la recevabilité de celui qui le porte. On le +voit avec une netteté particulière dans les scènes d'asile. Un récit +commence ; il pourrait être celui d'une fuite, d'une persécution, d'un +monde devenu impraticable. -Mais très vite, il est pris dans une autre logique : non plus seulement que t’est-il arrivé, mais es-tu cohérent, constant, documentable, crédible ? Tes mots concordent-ils avec les catégories du droit ? Ton histoire entre-t-elle dans les formats disponibles ? Le tort n’est pas nié frontalement ; il est suspendu à la preuve d’une recevabilité personnelle. +Mais très vite, il est pris dans une autre logique : non plus seulement +que t'est-il arrivé, mais es-tu cohérent, constant, documentable, +crédible ? Tes mots concordent-ils avec les catégories du droit ? Ton +histoire entre-t-elle dans les formats disponibles ? Le tort n'est pas +nié frontalement ; il est suspendu à la preuve d'une recevabilité +personnelle. -Le cas des mineurs non accompagnés radicalise encore ce schème. En théorie, la protection due à l’enfance s’impose ; en pratique, elle est souvent subordonnée à une démonstration préalable : prouver son âge, sa cohérence, sa trajectoire, parfois même son corps. L’enfant n’apparaît pas d’abord comme sujet à protéger ; il apparaît comme cas à vérifier. La vulnérabilité n’ouvre pas la scène ; elle doit d’abord s’y rendre crédible. Le cosmopolitique apparaît alors moins comme idéal d’universalité déjà disponible que comme épreuve de seuil : possibilité, ou impossibilité, pour un tort de franchir les conditions qui le séparent encore de sa propre recevabilité. +Le cas des mineurs non accompagnés radicalise encore ce schème. En +théorie, la protection due à l'enfance s'impose ; en pratique, elle est +souvent subordonnée à une démonstration préalable : prouver son âge, sa +cohérence, sa trajectoire, parfois même son corps. L'enfant n'apparaît +pas d'abord comme sujet à protéger ; il apparaît comme cas à vérifier. +La vulnérabilité n'ouvre pas la scène ; elle doit d'abord s'y rendre +crédible. Le cosmopolitique apparaît alors moins comme idéal +d'universalité déjà disponible que comme épreuve de seuil : possibilité, +ou impossibilité, pour un tort de franchir les conditions qui le +séparent encore de sa propre recevabilité. -Il faut mesurer la violence propre à un tel régime. Elle ne prend pas nécessairement la forme d’une exclusion spectaculaire, ni même d’un refus explicite. Elle opère plus finement, dans l’écart entre ce qui est vécu et la forme sous laquelle ce vécu devient admissible. Le sujet peut parler, mais il découvre que sa parole n’entre qu’à condition d’avoir déjà appris la langue dans laquelle elle devra compter. Il peut témoigner, mais son témoignage n’acquiert de poids qu’en s’ajustant à des attentes de cohérence, de stabilité, de vérifiabilité qui ne coïncident jamais tout à fait avec la manière dont une existence blessée se raconte effectivement. La violence se situe dans l’obligation de se reconfigurer pour franchir une porte demeurée juste entrouverte. Ce n’est pas un simple détail procédural. C’est une transformation de la scène elle-même : avant que le tort puisse être reconnu, il faut déjà que le sujet ait consenti à une certaine discipline de son apparition. +Il faut mesurer la violence propre à un tel régime. Elle ne prend pas +nécessairement la forme d'une exclusion spectaculaire, ni même d'un +refus explicite. Elle opère plus finement, dans l'écart entre ce qui est +vécu et la forme sous laquelle ce vécu devient admissible. Le sujet peut +parler, mais il découvre que sa parole n'entre qu'à condition d'avoir +déjà appris la langue dans laquelle elle devra compter. Il peut +témoigner, mais son témoignage n'acquiert de poids qu'en s'ajustant à +des attentes de cohérence, de stabilité, de vérifiabilité qui ne +coïncident jamais tout à fait avec la manière dont une existence blessée +se raconte effectivement. La violence se situe dans l'obligation de se +reconfigurer pour franchir une porte demeurée juste entrouverte. Ce +n'est pas un simple détail procédural. C'est une transformation de la +scène elle-même : avant que le tort puisse être reconnu, il faut déjà +que le sujet ait consenti à une certaine discipline de son apparition. -Si la première figure de la tension cosmopolitique se jouait dans l’épreuve du récit, une seconde configuration se déploie plus en amont encore, à un niveau où la parole n’a pas même commencé. Le sujet n’entre plus dans un espace où il sera évalué ; il est déjà inscrit dans un dispositif qui le situe, le classe, l’oriente avant même qu’il ne puisse formuler ce qui lui arrive. +Si la première figure de la tension cosmopolitique se jouait dans +l'épreuve du récit, une seconde configuration se déploie plus en amont +encore, à un niveau où la parole n'a pas même commencé. Le sujet n'entre +plus dans un espace où il sera évalué ; il est déjà inscrit dans un +dispositif qui le situe, le classe, l'oriente avant même qu'il ne puisse +formuler ce qui lui arrive. -Dans les régimes contemporains de gestion des mobilités, des identités et des trajectoires, la qualification précède de plus en plus l’énonciation. L’exemple des systèmes biométriques et des architectures de traçabilité en fournit une illustration particulièrement nette. L’enregistrement d’une empreinte, l’attribution d’un identifiant, la corrélation avec une base de données ne sont pas de simples opérations techniques : ce sont des actes de pré-inscription. À partir de ces gestes, une trajectoire est déjà interprétée, une appartenance procédurale esquissée, un parcours présumé. Le corps devient trace, la trace devient dossier, et le dossier précède la parole. Le sujet n’apparaît plus d’abord comme porteur d’un différend ; il apparaît comme unité de traitement. +Dans les régimes contemporains de gestion des mobilités, des identités +et des trajectoires, la qualification précède de plus en plus +l'énonciation. L'exemple des systèmes biométriques et des architectures +de traçabilité en fournit une illustration particulièrement nette. +L'enregistrement d'une empreinte, l'attribution d'un identifiant, la +corrélation avec une base de données ne sont pas de simples opérations +techniques : ce sont des actes de pré-inscription. À partir de ces +gestes, une trajectoire est déjà interprétée, une appartenance +procédurale esquissée, un parcours présumé. Le corps devient trace, la +trace devient dossier, et le dossier précède la parole. Le sujet +n'apparaît plus d'abord comme porteur d'un différend ; il apparaît comme +unité de traitement. -Cette logique devient plus visible encore dans les espaces de tri avancé, où identification, évaluation et orientation se concentrent et s’accélèrent. L’identification se fait ici, l’évaluation ailleurs, la décision encore ailleurs. Le sujet traverse ces séquences sans jamais pouvoir les saisir comme une scène unifiée. Ce qui pourrait être formulé comme expérience globale se disperse dans une succession d’opérations techniques. La comparution devient séquentielle ; le différend, discontinu. La scène ne s’abolit donc pas par suppression frontale ; elle se défait par décomposition, puisque ce qui est vécu se trouve traité avant d’être tenu. +Cette logique devient plus visible encore dans les espaces de tri +avancé, où identification, évaluation et orientation se concentrent et +s'accélèrent. L'identification se fait ici, l'évaluation ailleurs, la +décision encore ailleurs. Le sujet traverse ces séquences sans jamais +pouvoir les saisir comme une scène unifiée. Ce qui pourrait être formulé +comme expérience globale se disperse dans une succession d'opérations +techniques. La comparution devient séquentielle ; le différend, +discontinu. La scène ne s'abolit donc pas par suppression frontale ; +elle se défait par décomposition, puisque ce qui est vécu se trouve +traité avant d'être tenu. -Ce morcellement n’a rien d’anodin. Il modifie le régime temporel même de l’apparition. Dans une scène encore habitable, le sujet peut au moins espérer que ce qu’il dit reconfigure la compréhension de ce qui lui arrive. Ici, l’ordre s’inverse : la compréhension procédurale précède déjà la parole et l’attend sous une forme étroite. Le sujet ne rencontre pas d’abord un espace où son récit pourrait orienter l’instruction ; il rencontre une chaîne où l’instruction a déjà distribué les places, les catégories et les issues plausibles. Ce n’est pas simplement que la parole y devient plus difficile. C’est qu’elle y devient seconde, dérivée, latérale, comme si l’essentiel s’était joué dans les opérations qui l’ont précédée. La comparution n’est plus seulement filtrée ; elle est anticipée par des dispositifs qui transforment d’avance l’expérience en dossier, la trajectoire en parcours type, le corps en support de décision. +Ce morcellement n'a rien d'anodin. Il modifie le régime temporel même de +l'apparition. Dans une scène encore habitable, le sujet peut au moins +espérer que ce qu'il dit reconfigure la compréhension de ce qui lui +arrive. Ici, l'ordre s'inverse : la compréhension procédurale précède +déjà la parole et l'attend sous une forme étroite. Le sujet ne rencontre +pas d'abord un espace où son récit pourrait orienter l'instruction ; il +rencontre une chaîne où l'instruction a déjà distribué les places, les +catégories et les issues plausibles. Ce n'est pas simplement que la +parole y devient plus difficile. C'est qu'elle y devient seconde, +dérivée, latérale, comme si l'essentiel s'était joué dans les opérations +qui l'ont précédée. La comparution n'est plus seulement filtrée ; elle +est anticipée par des dispositifs qui transforment d'avance l'expérience +en dossier, la trajectoire en parcours type, le corps en support de +décision. -Ainsi se dessine une seconde ligne de fracture du cosmopolitique, celle d’un monde où la comparution est précédée par des dispositifs qui configurent déjà ce qui pourra apparaître et être reconnu. +Ainsi se dessine une seconde ligne de fracture du cosmopolitique, celle +d'un monde où la comparution est précédée par des dispositifs qui +configurent déjà ce qui pourra apparaître et être reconnu. -Mais cette transformation ne s’arrête pas là. Car même lorsque des scènes existent, même lorsque la parole circule, même lorsque des forums sont ouverts, il n’est pas certain que le différend puisse y être effectivement institué. Une troisième figure apparaît alors : celle d’une dissociation entre scène déclarée et scène opératoire. Dans de nombreuses arènes contemporaines, tout semble réuni pour produire une forme de co-présence globale : acteurs multiples, dispositifs ouverts, langages de participation, d’inclusion et de transparence. La scène existe bien comme lieu d’expression, de visibilité et de légitimation. Mais une part décisive des opérations se joue ailleurs, dans des espaces moins visibles, plus restreints, souvent spécialisés, parfois privatisés. Ce qui est discuté publiquement ne coïncide pas avec ce qui est effectivement décidé. La scène délibère, tandis que l’opération structurante se joue ailleurs. On a ainsi affaire à une scène dissociée : non pas illusion pure, mais scène partielle, capable d’accueillir, de relayer, parfois de mettre en relation, sans pour autant constituer le centre effectif de transformation. +Mais cette transformation ne s'arrête pas là. Car même lorsque des +scènes existent, même lorsque la parole circule, même lorsque des forums +sont ouverts, il n'est pas certain que le différend puisse y être +effectivement institué. Une troisième figure apparaît alors : celle +d'une dissociation entre scène déclarée et scène opératoire. Dans de +nombreuses arènes contemporaines, tout semble réuni pour produire une +forme de co-présence globale : acteurs multiples, dispositifs ouverts, +langages de participation, d'inclusion et de transparence. La scène +existe bien comme lieu d'expression, de visibilité et de légitimation. +Mais une part décisive des opérations se joue ailleurs, dans des espaces +moins visibles, plus restreints, souvent spécialisés, parfois +privatisés. Ce qui est discuté publiquement ne coïncide pas avec ce qui +est effectivement décidé. La scène délibère, tandis que l'opération +structurante se joue ailleurs. On a ainsi affaire à une scène dissociée +: non pas illusion pure, mais scène partielle, capable d'accueillir, de +relayer, parfois de mettre en relation, sans pour autant constituer le +centre effectif de transformation. -Cette dissociation fragilise la possibilité même de localiser le cosmopolitique. +Cette dissociation fragilise la possibilité même de localiser le +cosmopolitique. -Car le problème n’est plus seulement qu’il existerait des scènes insuffisantes ; il est que l’on ne sait plus toujours où se joue ce qui compte. Une conférence peut exhiber la pluralité des voix sans disposer de prise sur les opérations décisives. Un forum peut accueillir des récits, des objections, des revendications, sans que ces énoncés atteignent les lieux où se fixent effectivement les standards, les financements, les protocoles ou les critères de recevabilité. La scène n’est donc pas vide ; elle est latéralement désarmée. Elle fonctionne comme espace de publicité, parfois de reconnaissance, parfois même de mise en relation, mais sans coïncider pleinement avec le lieu où les asymétries sont transformables. Ce décalage est majeur : il ne supprime pas le cosmopolitique, mais le rend topologiquement incertain. +Car le problème n'est plus seulement qu'il existerait des scènes +insuffisantes ; il est que l'on ne sait plus toujours où se joue ce qui +compte. Une conférence peut exhiber la pluralité des voix sans disposer +de prise sur les opérations décisives. Un forum peut accueillir des +récits, des objections, des revendications, sans que ces énoncés +atteignent les lieux où se fixent effectivement les standards, les +financements, les protocoles ou les critères de recevabilité. La scène +n'est donc pas vide ; elle est latéralement désarmée. Elle fonctionne +comme espace de publicité, parfois de reconnaissance, parfois même de +mise en relation, mais sans coïncider pleinement avec le lieu où les +asymétries sont transformables. Ce décalage est majeur : il ne supprime +pas le cosmopolitique, mais le rend topologiquement incertain. -Le monde contemporain est traversé par une multiplicité de scènes partielles, hétérogènes, hiérarchisées, dont aucune ne peut prétendre à elle seule à la centralité. Il en résulte ce qu’on peut appeler une polyphonie disjointe des légitimités : plusieurs voix prétendent organiser le monde, plusieurs récits de justice, de droit, de développement ou de réparation coexistent, mais leur coexistence ne produit pas spontanément une scène commune. Le cosmopolitique ne disparaît pas ; il se fragmente en scènes partiellement traductibles, dont l’articulation demeure fragile. +Le monde contemporain est traversé par une multiplicité de scènes +partielles, hétérogènes, hiérarchisées, dont aucune ne peut prétendre à +elle seule à la centralité. Il en résulte ce qu'on peut appeler une +polyphonie disjointe des légitimités : plusieurs voix prétendent +organiser le monde, plusieurs récits de justice, de droit, de +développement ou de réparation coexistent, mais leur coexistence ne +produit pas spontanément une scène commune. Le cosmopolitique ne +disparaît pas ; il se fragmente en scènes partiellement traductibles, +dont l'articulation demeure fragile. -Il faut mesurer ce que cela signifie. Une voix supplémentaire ne suffit pas à réparer la fragmentation, pas plus qu’une scène plus peuplée ne devient par là même plus juste. Lorsque les régimes de validité restent hétérogènes, l’addition des prises de parole peut même accroître la disjonction, en donnant l’apparence d’une pluralité bien accueillie là où manque encore l’espace dans lequel cette pluralité pourrait se travailler comme différend. La difficulté n’est donc pas seulement de faire entendre davantage de voix, mais de produire des formes où ces voix ne soient pas condamnées à coexister sans se répondre véritablement. Sans une telle articulation, la diversité des récits ne devient pas richesse politique ; elle risque de n’être qu’un morcellement plus raffiné de l’inaudible. +Il faut mesurer ce que cela signifie. Une voix supplémentaire ne suffit +pas à réparer la fragmentation, pas plus qu'une scène plus peuplée ne +devient par là même plus juste. Lorsque les régimes de validité restent +hétérogènes, l'addition des prises de parole peut même accroître la +disjonction, en donnant l'apparence d'une pluralité bien accueillie là +où manque encore l'espace dans lequel cette pluralité pourrait se +travailler comme différend. La difficulté n'est donc pas seulement de +faire entendre davantage de voix, mais de produire des formes où ces +voix ne soient pas condamnées à coexister sans se répondre +véritablement. Sans une telle articulation, la diversité des récits ne +devient pas richesse politique ; elle risque de n'être qu'un +morcellement plus raffiné de l'inaudible. -Dès lors, la difficulté n’est pas seulement de faire entrer davantage de voix dans des scènes déjà constituées. Elle est de savoir comment articuler entre elles des scènes hétérogènes, dont certaines produisent de la visibilité sans opérativité, tandis que d’autres produisent de l’opérativité sans véritable comparution. Le différend ne manque pas de lieux ; il manque d’une géométrie où ces lieux puissent encore se répondre. +Dès lors, la difficulté n'est pas seulement de faire entrer davantage de +voix dans des scènes déjà constituées. Elle est de savoir comment +articuler entre elles des scènes hétérogènes, dont certaines produisent +de la visibilité sans opérativité, tandis que d'autres produisent de +l'opérativité sans véritable comparution. Le différend ne manque pas de +lieux ; il manque d'une géométrie où ces lieux puissent encore se +répondre. -C’est pourquoi la dissociation contemporaine ne doit pas être comprise comme une simple dispersion empirique des arènes. Elle engage une modification plus profonde de l’expérience cosmopolitique elle-même. Lorsqu’une scène produit de la visibilité sans prise, ceux qui y apparaissent peuvent être vus sans pouvoir infléchir ce qui les affecte. Lorsqu’une autre produit de l’opérativité sans comparution, des décisions les concernant peuvent être prises sans qu’ils disposent d’un lieu où les reprendre. La difficulté tient précisément à cette coupure : d’un côté, des espaces où l’on peut encore parler ; de l’autre, des lieux où quelque chose agit, mais sans devoir se laisser véritablement interpeller. Le cosmopolitique se trouve alors partagé entre des scènes de publicité et des centres d’opération qui ne se recouvrent plus. Il n’est pas absent ; il est disjoint dans sa texture même. +C'est pourquoi la dissociation contemporaine ne doit pas être comprise +comme une simple dispersion empirique des arènes. Elle engage une +modification plus profonde de l'expérience cosmopolitique elle-même. +Lorsqu'une scène produit de la visibilité sans prise, ceux qui y +apparaissent peuvent être vus sans pouvoir infléchir ce qui les affecte. +Lorsqu'une autre produit de l'opérativité sans comparution, des +décisions les concernant peuvent être prises sans qu'ils disposent d'un +lieu où les reprendre. La difficulté tient précisément à cette coupure : +d'un côté, des espaces où l'on peut encore parler ; de l'autre, des +lieux où quelque chose agit, mais sans devoir se laisser véritablement +interpeller. Le cosmopolitique se trouve alors partagé entre des scènes +de publicité et des centres d'opération qui ne se recouvrent plus. Il +n'est pas absent ; il est disjoint dans sa texture même. -Mais là où les grandes scènes se fragmentent, se déplacent ou se dissocient, quelque chose ne disparaît pas entièrement. Cela se contracte, se reconfigure, persiste à bas bruit sous forme de scènes faibles. Celles-ci n’ont ni la puissance des grandes arènes internationales ni leur universalité déclarée ; elles sont souvent locales, précaires, instables, partiellement reconnues. Et pourtant, elles accomplissent quelque chose que les grandes scènes peinent de plus en plus à assurer : elles ouvrent un seuil d’apparition. +Mais là où les grandes scènes se fragmentent, se déplacent ou se +dissocient, quelque chose ne disparaît pas entièrement. Cela se +contracte, se reconfigure, persiste à bas bruit sous forme de scènes +faibles. Celles-ci n'ont ni la puissance des grandes arènes +internationales ni leur universalité déclarée ; elles sont souvent +locales, précaires, instables, partiellement reconnues. Et pourtant, +elles accomplissent quelque chose que les grandes scènes peinent de plus +en plus à assurer : elles ouvrent un seuil d'apparition. -Leur faiblesse n’est pas un simple déficit de puissance. Elle est aussi leur mode d’existence propre dans un monde où les grandes scènes tendent à absorber, reformater ou disqualifier trop vite ce qui cherche à apparaître. Elles disposent de peu de garanties, de peu d’institutions stables, de peu de relais massifs ; mais c’est justement cette faible armature qui les contraint à inventer des formes de comparution plus proches de l’expérience qu’elles cherchent à porter. Une scène faible ne vaut donc pas malgré sa fragilité, mais à travers elle : parce qu’elle maintient encore un espace où l’expérience peut être portée sans être immédiatement reconduite à des formats de traitement déjà stabilisés. +Leur faiblesse n'est pas un simple déficit de puissance. Elle est aussi +leur mode d'existence propre dans un monde où les grandes scènes tendent +à absorber, reformater ou disqualifier trop vite ce qui cherche à +apparaître. Elles disposent de peu de garanties, de peu d'institutions +stables, de peu de relais massifs ; mais c'est justement cette faible +armature qui les contraint à inventer des formes de comparution plus +proches de l'expérience qu'elles cherchent à porter. Une scène faible ne +vaut donc pas malgré sa fragilité, mais à travers elle : parce qu'elle +maintient encore un espace où l'expérience peut être portée sans être +immédiatement reconduite à des formats de traitement déjà stabilisés. -Dans certaines configurations, un fleuve peut devenir sujet de droit, non pas au sens métaphorique, mais au sens d’une inscription effective dans un dispositif où pollution, extraction ou destruction deviennent litige. Ailleurs, des collectifs sans statut instituent eux-mêmes les formes de leur comparution : assemblées, protocoles d’adresse, archives, procédures internes, autant de manières de ne pas seulement demander à être reconnus, mais de fabriquer les conditions de leur apparition. Ces formes ne réalisent pas l’universel ; elles en expérimentent les conditions. +Dans certaines configurations, un fleuve peut devenir sujet de droit, +non pas au sens métaphorique, mais au sens d'une inscription effective +dans un dispositif où pollution, extraction ou destruction deviennent +litige. Ailleurs, des collectifs sans statut instituent eux-mêmes les +formes de leur comparution : assemblées, protocoles d'adresse, archives, +procédures internes, autant de manières de ne pas seulement demander à +être reconnus, mais de fabriquer les conditions de leur apparition. Ces +formes ne réalisent pas l'universel ; elles en expérimentent les +conditions. -C’est pourquoi leur faiblesse ne doit pas être interprétée comme une simple insuffisance. Elle révèle au contraire quelque chose de fondamental : l’universalité n’existe pas d’abord comme cadre majestueusement déjà là, attendant d’être appliqué à des cas singuliers ; elle se forme, de manière souvent précaire, dans des scènes où des existences jusque-là disqualifiées parviennent à imposer qu’un tort soit non seulement exprimé, mais porté à hauteur d’objection partageable. Une scène faible ne vaut donc pas seulement par ce qu’elle obtient ; elle vaut par le type d’expérience politique qu’elle rend possible. Elle montre que l’universel n’est vivant que là où il accepte d’être repris depuis des situations qui ne lui préexistaient pas comme objets déjà bien formés. En ce sens, ces scènes n’ajoutent pas simplement des cas au monde commun ; elles en déplacent les conditions mêmes de composition. +C'est pourquoi leur faiblesse ne doit pas être interprétée comme une +simple insuffisance. Elle révèle au contraire quelque chose de +fondamental : l'universalité n'existe pas d'abord comme cadre +majestueusement déjà là, attendant d'être appliqué à des cas singuliers +; elle se forme, de manière souvent précaire, dans des scènes où des +existences jusque-là disqualifiées parviennent à imposer qu'un tort soit +non seulement exprimé, mais porté à hauteur d'objection partageable. Une +scène faible ne vaut donc pas seulement par ce qu'elle obtient ; elle +vaut par le type d'expérience politique qu'elle rend possible. Elle +montre que l'universel n'est vivant que là où il accepte d'être repris +depuis des situations qui ne lui préexistaient pas comme objets déjà +bien formés. En ce sens, ces scènes n'ajoutent pas simplement des cas au +monde commun ; elles en déplacent les conditions mêmes de composition. -C’est là leur intérêt théorique propre. Elles montrent que l’universalité n’est pas d’abord un contenu déjà disponible qu’il suffirait d’appliquer à des cas singuliers. Elle se travaille au contraire à partir de situations où des existences hétérogènes cherchent une forme de comparution qui ne les dissout pas. Cet universel n’est pas donné d’avance ; il devient objet de controverse à partir de scènes où des différences peuvent être exposées, traduites et disputées sans devoir se dissoudre pour être reconnues. +C'est là leur intérêt théorique propre. Elles montrent que +l'universalité n'est pas d'abord un contenu déjà disponible qu'il +suffirait d'appliquer à des cas singuliers. Elle se travaille au +contraire à partir de situations où des existences hétérogènes cherchent +une forme de comparution qui ne les dissout pas. Cet universel n'est pas +donné d'avance ; il devient objet de controverse à partir de scènes où +des différences peuvent être exposées, traduites et disputées sans +devoir se dissoudre pour être reconnues. -Le cosmopolitique contemporain apparaît ainsi moins comme scène mondiale unifiée que comme constellation instable de scènes hétérogènes, inégalement puissantes, partiellement connectées. Son enjeu n’est plus de totaliser le monde dans une forme unique, mais d’empêcher qu’il ne se ferme entièrement sous des régimes de traduction, de préemption ou de dissociation qui rendent les torts inaudibles. Ces scènes faibles n’offrent pas encore une universalité instituée ; elles en maintiennent la possibilité pratique, en rouvrant des seuils où le monde peut redevenir disputable, au moins localement. Leur portée n’est donc pas d’annoncer un universel déjà réconcilié, mais de préserver les conditions minimales à partir desquelles un monde commun peut encore être essayé. +Le cosmopolitique contemporain apparaît ainsi moins comme scène mondiale +unifiée que comme constellation instable de scènes hétérogènes, +inégalement puissantes, partiellement connectées. Son enjeu n'est plus +de totaliser le monde dans une forme unique, mais d'empêcher qu'il ne se +ferme entièrement sous des régimes de traduction, de préemption ou de +dissociation qui rendent les torts inaudibles. Ces scènes faibles +n'offrent pas encore une universalité instituée ; elles en maintiennent +la possibilité pratique, en rouvrant des seuils où le monde peut +redevenir disputable, au moins localement. Leur portée n'est donc pas +d'annoncer un universel déjà réconcilié, mais de préserver les +conditions minimales à partir desquelles un monde commun peut encore +être essayé. -La question centrale devient alors la suivante : comment maintenir des conditions minimales de comparution dans un monde où les scènes sont fragmentées, déplacées, préemptées ? Comment faire en sorte que des expériences hétérogènes puissent apparaître sans être immédiatement neutralisées par les dispositifs qui les reçoivent ? Cette question engage un seuil plus exigeant que celui de l’accès à la scène. Car une apparition ne vaut pas seulement parce qu’elle a eu lieu ; elle vaut par sa capacité à tenir, à se transmettre, à devenir partageable au-delà de l’instant qui l’a vue surgir. Or une scène ne tient pas par ses seules procédures, ni par la seule disponibilité d’un cadre juridique. Elle tient par des formes plus profondes — sensibles, narratives, symboliques, rituelles — capables de porter le différend au-delà de son énonciation immédiate. Sans ces formes, la comparution reste fragile : elle apparaît, puis se dissout ; elle s’exprime, mais ne se transmet pas ; elle est reconnue parfois, sans devenir habitable. Le problème change donc de plan. Il ne porte plus seulement sur les seuils d’apparition, mais sur les formes capables de soutenir ce qui apparaît. +La question centrale devient alors la suivante : comment maintenir des +conditions minimales de comparution dans un monde où les scènes sont +fragmentées, déplacées, préemptées ? Comment faire en sorte que des +expériences hétérogènes puissent apparaître sans être immédiatement +neutralisées par les dispositifs qui les reçoivent ? Cette question +engage un seuil plus exigeant que celui de l'accès à la scène. Car une +apparition ne vaut pas seulement parce qu'elle a eu lieu ; elle vaut par +sa capacité à tenir, à se transmettre, à devenir partageable au-delà de +l'instant qui l'a vue surgir. Or une scène ne tient pas par ses seules +procédures, ni par la seule disponibilité d'un cadre juridique. Elle +tient par des formes plus profondes — sensibles, narratives, +symboliques, rituelles — capables de porter le différend au-delà de +son énonciation immédiate. Sans ces formes, la comparution reste fragile +: elle apparaît, puis se dissout ; elle s'exprime, mais ne se transmet +pas ; elle est reconnue parfois, sans devenir habitable. Le problème +change donc de plan. Il ne porte plus seulement sur les seuils +d'apparition, mais sur les formes capables de soutenir ce qui apparaît. -C’est ici qu’apparaît la limite interne de toute scène strictement procédurale. Une procédure peut ouvrir, recevoir, instruire ; elle ne suffit pas pour autant à donner au différend une consistance durable. Il faut encore qu’existent des formes capables de le porter dans le temps, de le rendre mémorable, partageable, réinscriptible dans d’autres contextes que celui de son énonciation première. Sans cela, même une comparution réussie demeure ponctuelle. Elle produit un instant de visibilité sans produire encore une forme de tenue. La question n’est donc plus seulement celle de l’accès à la scène, mais celle de la durée symbolique d’une apparition. +C'est ici qu'apparaît la limite interne de toute scène strictement +procédurale. Une procédure peut ouvrir, recevoir, instruire ; elle ne +suffit pas pour autant à donner au différend une consistance durable. Il +faut encore qu'existent des formes capables de le porter dans le temps, +de le rendre mémorable, partageable, réinscriptible dans d'autres +contextes que celui de son énonciation première. Sans cela, même une +comparution réussie demeure ponctuelle. Elle produit un instant de +visibilité sans produire encore une forme de tenue. La question n'est +donc plus seulement celle de l'accès à la scène, mais celle de la durée +symbolique d'une apparition. -C’est précisément à ce point que l’exigence cosmopolitique rencontre sa propre limite interne. Elle peut ouvrir un passage, obtenir une adresse, faire surgir un sujet là où il demeurait auparavant intraduisible. Mais elle ne garantit pas encore que cette apparition puisse durer au-delà de la scène qui l’a rendue momentanément possible. Or un différend qui ne dure pas retombe vite dans l’état de plainte dispersée, d’alerte ponctuelle ou de visibilité sans lendemain. Il faut donc autre chose qu’une simple procédure d’accueil : il faut des formes capables d’assurer la reprise, la mémoire, la transmission, la réinscription du tort dans une temporalité plus longue que celle de son surgissement. Sans cette épaisseur, l’apparition demeure vulnérable à sa propre disparition. +C'est précisément à ce point que l'exigence cosmopolitique rencontre sa +propre limite interne. Elle peut ouvrir un passage, obtenir une adresse, +faire surgir un sujet là où il demeurait auparavant intraduisible. Mais +elle ne garantit pas encore que cette apparition puisse durer au-delà de +la scène qui l'a rendue momentanément possible. Or un différend qui ne +dure pas retombe vite dans l'état de plainte dispersée, d'alerte +ponctuelle ou de visibilité sans lendemain. Il faut donc autre chose +qu'une simple procédure d'accueil : il faut des formes capables +d'assurer la reprise, la mémoire, la transmission, la réinscription du +tort dans une temporalité plus longue que celle de son surgissement. +Sans cette épaisseur, l'apparition demeure vulnérable à sa propre +disparition. -Ce qui apparaissait jusqu’ici comme tension cosmopolitique — les conditions d’apparition des sujets dans un monde global — se déplace vers une question plus radicale : quelles formes permettent à une apparition de se maintenir, de se transmettre, de devenir partageable ? +Ce qui apparaissait jusqu'ici comme tension cosmopolitique — les +conditions d'apparition des sujets dans un monde global — se déplace +vers une question plus radicale : quelles formes permettent à une +apparition de se maintenir, de se transmettre, de devenir partageable ? -Ce déplacement est décisif. Car si aucune forme ne vient soutenir ce qui apparaît, alors même les scènes les plus ouvertes restent insuffisantes. Le différend peut surgir, être entendu, parfois même reconnu ; il ne se stabilise pas pour autant, ne devient pas transmissible, n’altère pas durablement les conditions dans lesquelles il est apparu. Le problème n’est donc plus seulement celui des seuils ; il devient celui des formes. Non plus seulement : comment apparaître ? Mais : dans quoi tenir ? +Ce déplacement est décisif. Car si aucune forme ne vient soutenir ce qui +apparaît, alors même les scènes les plus ouvertes restent insuffisantes. +Le différend peut surgir, être entendu, parfois même reconnu ; il ne se +stabilise pas pour autant, ne devient pas transmissible, n'altère pas +durablement les conditions dans lesquelles il est apparu. Le problème +n'est donc plus seulement celui des seuils ; il devient celui des +formes. Non plus seulement : comment apparaître ? Mais : dans quoi tenir +? -La limite du cosmopolitique se situe là. Il peut ouvrir des seuils d’apparition ; il ne peut pas, à lui seul, produire toutes les formes qui rendraient ces apparitions soutenables, partageables, durables. Dès lors, la question n’est plus uniquement : qui peut comparaître dans le monde ? Elle devient : dans quelles formes un monde peut-il encore porter ce qui le traverse ? À ce point précis, la tension cesse d’être seulement cosmopolitique. Elle devient culturelle, au sens le plus décisif du terme : celui des formes par lesquelles une civilisation rend ses conflits sensibles, transmissibles et supportables sans les dissoudre. +La limite du cosmopolitique se situe là. Il peut ouvrir des seuils +d'apparition ; il ne peut pas, à lui seul, produire toutes les formes +qui rendraient ces apparitions soutenables, partageables, durables. Dès +lors, la question n'est plus uniquement : qui peut comparaître dans le +monde ? Elle devient : dans quelles formes un monde peut-il encore +porter ce qui le traverse ? À ce point précis, la tension cesse d'être +seulement cosmopolitique. Elle devient culturelle, au sens le plus +décisif du terme : celui des formes par lesquelles une civilisation rend +ses conflits sensibles, transmissibles et supportables sans les +dissoudre. -C’est là que s’ouvre la nécessité de la section suivante. Car si les scènes cosmopolitiques peinent à tenir, ce n’est pas seulement faute de procédures ou d’institutions ; c’est aussi parce que les formes capables de porter ces scènes — formes sensibles, narratives, symboliques, rituelles — sont elles-mêmes fragilisées, saturées, vidées ou empêchées. Le cosmopolitique rencontre ici sa limite interne : il dépend d’un autre plan, d’une autre capacité, celle par laquelle un monde rend ses tensions figurables, transmissibles et partageables. La question bascule alors : non plus seulement, qui peut apparaître dans le monde ? mais dans quelles formes le monde peut-il encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde disputable ? C’est à cette nécessité que s’ouvre désormais la section suivante. +C'est là que s'ouvre la nécessité de la section suivante. Car si les +scènes cosmopolitiques peinent à tenir, ce n'est pas seulement faute de +procédures ou d'institutions ; c'est aussi parce que les formes capables +de porter ces scènes — formes sensibles, narratives, symboliques, +rituelles — sont elles-mêmes fragilisées, saturées, vidées ou +empêchées. Le cosmopolitique rencontre ici sa limite interne : il dépend +d'un autre plan, d'une autre capacité, celle par laquelle un monde rend +ses tensions figurables, transmissibles et partageables. La question +bascule alors : non plus seulement, qui peut apparaître dans le monde ? +mais dans quelles formes le monde peut-il encore apparaître à lui-même +comme monde disputable ? C'est à cette nécessité que s'ouvre désormais +la section suivante. ## **5.10 — Tensions culturelles et devenir civilisationnel** -En juin 2020, au plus fort des mobilisations consécutives à la mort de George Floyd, la statue d’Edward Colston est renversée à Bristol, traînée dans les rues puis jetée dans le port. La scène est filmée, relayée instantanément à l’échelle mondiale, commentée, reprise, contestée. Certains y voient un acte de justice symbolique tardive. D’autres dénoncent une destruction du patrimoine, un geste d’effacement, une violence contre l’histoire. Quelques mois plus tard, la statue est repêchée, exposée dans un musée, couchée, conservée avec les traces de peinture et de corde. Elle devient à son tour scène de litige. - -Rien, dans cette séquence, ne peut être réduit à un simple affrontement d’opinions. Il ne s’y joue pas seulement un conflit mémoriel, ni même une controverse politique classique. Ce qui s’y donne à voir est une instabilité plus profonde : celle des formes par lesquelles une société rend visible, contestable et transmissible ce qui la divise. La statue cesse d’être seulement un monument ; elle devient un opérateur de conflit. L’espace public cesse d’être un simple lieu de circulation ; il devient scène de renversement. Le musée, à son tour, ne se borne plus à conserver : il reconfigure le litige dans un autre régime de temporalité, de légitimité et de réception. Quant à l’histoire, elle perd sa fausse évidence de récit stabilisé ; elle redevient matière disputée. - -Le conflit surgit avec force, mais les formes capables de le porter durablement restent incertaines. Le geste est spectaculaire, immédiatement visible, mondialement relayé ; sa transformation en différend transmissible demeure fragile. Rien n’est résolu. Tout est déplacé, sans que ce déplacement garantisse encore une scène habitable. La séquence de Bristol ne met donc pas seulement aux prises deux lectures antagonistes d’un même objet — mémoire réparatrice contre destruction patrimoniale, justice symbolique contre effacement de l’histoire. Elle révèle plus profondément la difficulté croissante à instituer des formes où une société puisse reprendre ce qui, en elle, demeure historiquement non réconcilié. La tension culturelle apparaît déjà ici comme tension civilisationnelle : non la querelle autour d’un objet, mais l’épreuve d’un monde qui ne sait plus spontanément dans quelles formes porter ses propres fractures. - -Ce qui se joue ici ne se laisse pas réduire à la seule succession d’événements. La séquence articule en réalité plusieurs régimes de scène qui ne coïncident pas. Le monument relevait d’un ordre de stabilisation : il inscrivait dans la pierre une continuité supposée, naturalisait une certaine lecture du passé, rendait silencieuses les tensions qui l’avaient rendu possible. La rue, au contraire, opère comme espace de réadressage : elle expose ce qui était tenu pour acquis, le soumet à une reprise conflictuelle, transforme un héritage en enjeu disputable. Le musée, enfin, n’annule ni l’un ni l’autre ; il reconfigure. Il capture le geste, en modifie la temporalité, transforme l’événement en archive active, en objet de médiation, en surface de réinterprétation. - -Ces trois régimes ne s’annulent pas ; ils entrent en tension. Aucun ne suffit à lui seul à instituer une scène pleinement habitable. Le monument stabilise au prix d’un refoulement. La rue révèle au prix d’une intensité difficile à soutenir. Le musée conserve au prix d’un déplacement qui peut aussi neutraliser. Entre ces pôles, la question demeure ouverte : dans quelle forme ce qui a été rendu visible peut-il encore être repris sans être soit figé, soit dissipé ? - -Il faut alors distinguer deux niveaux que la séquence tend à confondre sans les résoudre : celui de la visibilité et celui de la tenue. L’événement est visible, immédiatement, massivement, globalement. Mais cette visibilité ne garantit en rien sa transformation en différend transmissible. Elle expose ; elle ne suffit pas à porter. Elle rend perceptible ; elle ne stabilise pas nécessairement une forme où le conflit puisse être repris, partagé, travaillé dans la durée. - -C’est à ce point précis que la tension culturelle se révèle dans toute son ampleur. Le problème ne réside pas dans l’absence de formes, mais dans leur discordance. Les formes existent, mais elles ne s’articulent plus spontanément en une scène capable de porter ce qui apparaît. La culture ne manque pas d’expression ; elle peine à configurer des régimes de reprise. Et c’est cette difficulté, déjà lisible dans la séquence de Bristol, qui se déploiera dans l’ensemble de ce qui suit. - -La leçon est incisive. La culture n’est pas d’abord ce qui représente un monde ; elle rend possible l’apparition disputable de ce qui le traverse. Elle ne se réduit ni aux œuvres, ni aux institutions, ni aux productions symboliques. Elle désigne le régime de formes par lequel une société peut encore faire quelque chose de ce qui la divise. - -Or c’est précisément cette capacité qui se trouve aujourd’hui fragilisée. - -Les conflits culturels ne manquent pas. Ils prolifèrent même. Statues déboulonnées, noms de rues contestés, programmes scolaires disputés, œuvres censurées ou réinterprétées, archives réouvertes, récits concurrents, mémoires antagonistes : partout les signes d’une conflictualité symbolique réactivée se multiplient. Pourtant, cette intensification ne produit pas nécessairement plus de scènes. Elle engendre souvent des surgissements sans tenue, des affrontements sans médiation, des visibilités sans transduction. Le conflit apparaît, mais ne se stabilise pas dans une forme partageable. Il circule, mais ne se transmet pas. Il mobilise, mais ne configure pas durablement un espace de co-présence. - -C’est ici que la section précédente trouve son point de bascule. Le cosmopolitique, nous l’avons vu, se heurte à la difficulté d’instituer des scènes où des expériences hétérogènes puissent apparaître sans être immédiatement reformattées par les conditions de leur recevabilité. Mais cette difficulté ne relève pas seulement des dispositifs juridiques, administratifs ou politiques. Elle touche un plan plus profond : celui des formes capables de porter ce qui apparaît. Une scène ne tient pas seulement par ses règles. Elle tient par ses formes. Lorsque ces formes se fragilisent, même les dispositifs les plus ouverts deviennent insuffisants. Le conflit surgit, mais ne trouve pas le régime dans lequel il pourrait devenir différend. L’apparition a lieu, mais elle ne devient pas habitable. - -La culture doit alors être reprise, non comme domaine, mais comme condition. Il ne s’agit pas ici d’un patrimoine, d’un secteur ou d’une production de contenus. Il s’agit du milieu instituant de la conflictualité symbolique : du plan transductif par lequel une société rend ses tensions sensibles, transmissibles et disputables. La culture n’exprime pas un monde déjà constitué. Elle est ce par quoi ce monde peut encore se former. - -Une telle requalification oblige à relire l’ensemble du chapitre. Les tensions économiques, écologiques, sociales, politiques, psychiques, médiatiques, techniques, géopolitiques et cosmopolitiques ne deviennent habitables qu’à travers des formes capables de les porter. Sans elles, elles ne disparaissent pas ; elles se déchaînent ou se dissolvent. - -Il faut même aller plus loin. Si la culture constitue ici un seuil ultime, ce n’est pas parce qu’elle surplomberait abstraitement les autres tensions, mais parce qu’elle en recueille la mise en forme sensible, narrative et symbolique. L’économique ne produit pas seulement des inégalités, des flux et des dettes ; il produit aussi des imaginaires de réussite, de mérite, de frustration et de relégation, sans lesquels les distributions matérielles elles-mêmes ne seraient pas vécues comme justes, insupportables ou contestables. L’écologique engage bien davantage que des ressources, des milieux et des limites ; il engage des manières de sentir la perte, d’éprouver l’irréversibilité, de se rapporter au vivant, d’habiter ou non un monde menacé. Le social excède la seule distribution des places, des revenus ou des protections : il engage des formes de reconnaissance, des seuils de visibilité, des expériences de mépris, d’abandon, d’humiliation ou d’appartenance, sans lesquelles une société ne sait plus si elle tient encore comme monde partagé ou si elle se défait en coexistences inégalement tolérées. Le politique ne tient jamais par ses seules institutions ; il dépend de scènes où la division peut apparaître sans être rabattue sur l’ennemi absolu ou sur la pure administration. Le psychique excède lui aussi la seule intériorité : une souffrance ne devient traversable que si des formes existent pour la symboliser, la raconter, l’inscrire dans autre chose qu’un isolement opaque. Le médiatique configure les régimes de vitesse, d’attention, de saturation ou d’érosion par lesquels une société éprouve ses propres conflits. Le technique transforme non seulement les procédures, mais les formats perceptifs eux-mêmes, les seuils de présence, les régimes d’évidence, les manières de croire qu’un monde est encore habitable. Le géopolitique travaille les récits de légitimité, les dramaturgies de puissance, les formes de l’ennemi, les imaginaires du centre et de la périphérie. Le cosmopolitique, enfin, engage les conditions sous lesquelles un tort peut devenir recevable à l’échelle du monde sans être mutilé par les cadres censés l’accueillir. À chaque niveau, la culture constitue ainsi le plan où les tensions peuvent être figurées, transmises, disputées ou, au contraire, neutralisées. La question culturelle n’arrive donc pas au terme du chapitre comme un supplément d’âme ou comme une simple ouverture finale. Elle apparaît comme le plan où toutes les tensions précédentes révèlent leur dépendance à l’égard des formes qui les portent. - -L’intuition d’Edgar Morin prend alors tout son poids. Une culture vivante n’est pas un stock de signes, mais un tissu capable d’intégrer ses propres perturbations sans les abolir. Elle tient parce qu’elle sait faire circuler, symboliser et retravailler ses conflits. Une telle capacité dépend pourtant de formes concrètes, de scènes, de dispositifs. Elle dépend, au sens rigoureux du terme, d’une archicration. - -C’est précisément cette archicration culturelle qui se désactive. Les formes subsistent. Les intensités prolifèrent. Mais leur articulation disputable se fragilise. La question doit dès lors être reformulée à son niveau exact : il ne s’agit plus seulement de savoir si une société produit de la culture, mais si elle dispose encore de formes où ce qui la divise peut être tenu sans être immédiatement détruit ou neutralisé. - -À ce stade, le problème change de nature. Il cesse d’être sectoriel. Il devient civilisationnel. Une civilisation ne se définit pas uniquement par ce qu’elle produit, conserve ou administre. Elle se définit aussi par sa capacité à donner forme à ce qui la traverse. Elle tient dans la mesure où elle parvient à rendre partageable ce qui pourrait la déchirer. La question décisive devient alors la suivante : dans quelles formes un monde peut-il encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde disputable ? - -La question culturelle doit donc être reprise comme interrogation sur les régimes dans lesquels une production symbolique est prise, c’est-à-dire sur les conditions sous lesquelles elle peut, ou non, instituer une scène. Or ces régimes ne se distribuent pas de manière homogène. Ils dessinent au contraire des configurations récurrentes où l’articulation entre formes, intensités et scènes se trouve altérée. Ce qui se fragilise, ce n’est pas la culture elle-même, mais sa capacité à faire tenir ensemble ces dimensions. C’est à partir de cette désarticulation qu’il devient possible de décrire les formes contemporaines de désarchicration culturelle. - -Un premier régime se laisse reconnaître là où les formes subsistent, parfois avec une remarquable stabilité, mais sans être véritablement traversées par une conflictualité vivante. Les institutions culturelles assurent leurs fonctions, les dispositifs de transmission restent en place, les œuvres circulent, les archives s’accumulent, les commémorations se déploient avec précision. Rien, en apparence, ne manque. Pourtant, ce qui faisait de ces formes autre chose que de simples supports de conservation tend à s’éroder. Le passé est présenté sans être réellement repris ; la mémoire est mobilisée sans être remise en tension ; la transmission opère sans rouvrir les conflits qui lui donnaient sens. Ce qui se perd ici n’est pas la forme, mais sa capacité à engager ce qu’elle transmet dans une épreuve commune. On visite, on apprend, on est parfois ému ; rien n’oblige pourtant la mémoire à redevenir épreuve. Les fractures sont nommées, non rouvertes. La forme protège le passé plus qu’elle ne l’expose à une reprise. - -Ce déplacement produit un effet plus subtil encore. À mesure que les formes gagnent en stabilité, elles acquièrent une forme d’autorité tranquille qui les rend d’autant moins contestables. Elles continuent d’organiser le rapport au passé, mais elles le font sous un régime qui privilégie la continuité plutôt que la tension. Le passé apparaît comme partagé précisément parce qu’il n’est plus suffisamment disputé. Il devient un bien commun pacifié, dont la fonction principale consiste moins à ouvrir des fractures qu’à garantir une certaine cohérence symbolique. - -Dans ce contexte, la reconnaissance elle-même peut devenir ambiguë. Reconnaître un passé, le nommer, l’exposer, lui donner une place dans l’espace public ou institutionnel ne signifie pas nécessairement le remettre en jeu. Il est possible de reconnaître sans rouvrir, de transmettre sans exposer, de conserver sans engager. Ce qui se perd alors, ce n’est pas la mémoire, mais sa capacité à obliger. Elle informe, elle sensibilise, elle éduque parfois ; elle ne met plus nécessairement à l’épreuve. - -Une telle configuration tend à produire des formes culturellement valorisées, institutionnellement solides, socialement acceptées, mais dont la puissance instituante s’est affaiblie. Elles assurent la continuité, mais ne provoquent plus la reprise. Elles stabilisent, mais ne déplacent plus. Leur efficacité tient à leur capacité à pacifier le rapport au passé ; leur limite tient à leur incapacité croissante à en faire une matière vivante de conflit partagé. - -On aurait tort d’y voir seulement un programme délibéré de neutralisation. Ce régime répond aussi à des exigences réelles : rendre accessible, stabiliser, protéger, transmettre. Mais c’est dans cette stabilisation même que s’opère le déplacement. À mesure que les formes se sécurisent, leur puissance instituante peut se réduire. La mémoire devient surface d’exposition, le patrimoine évidence partagée, la transmission répétition. La culture cesse alors d’être un opérateur de mise en tension pour devenir un régime de stabilisation. Elle continue d’organiser le rapport au passé, mais ne permet plus nécessairement d’en rouvrir les fractures. Les grandes commémorations contemporaines rendent cette transformation particulièrement visible. Elles mobilisent des ressources considérables, déploient des dispositifs sophistiqués, intègrent parfois des voix multiples. Elles tendent pourtant à contourner ce qui ferait véritablement litige : les violences encore actives, les hiérarchies d’expérience, les héritages inégalement transmissibles. Le conflit n’est pas nié frontalement ; il est déplacé hors de la scène. La forme demeure, mais sa puissance de reprise s’affaiblit. L’arcalité subsiste ; son tranchant instituant s’émousse. - -Un second régime se caractérise, à l’inverse, non par un manque, mais par une surabondance. Ici, l’intensité prolifère. Les affects circulent avec rapidité, les images se multiplient, les dispositifs immersifs se densifient, les formats culturels sollicitent fortement la présence et l’émotion. Tout semble plus immédiat, plus engageant, plus sensible. Cette intensification ne produit pourtant pas davantage de scène. Elle tend au contraire à comprimer le temps symbolique nécessaire à la formation d’un différend. - -Dans ces configurations, l’expérience est souvent forte, parfois bouleversante. On entre, on est enveloppé, sollicité, déplacé, parfois même saisi ; mais l’expérience s’épuise dans son propre présent et ne laisse pas place à ce qui permettrait sa reprise. Il manque un seuil, une distance, un rituel. L’intensité se consomme dans son surgissement. L’affect circule, mais ne se stabilise pas dans une forme partageable. Ce qui est éprouvé reste attaché à l’instant de son apparition. Le rapport entre sensible et symbolique s’en trouve profondément déplacé : lorsque l’intensité n’est pas médiatisée, elle ne peut pas être reprise collectivement. Elle demeure fragmentée, non transductive. Certaines formes culturelles contemporaines — notamment celles qui privilégient l’immersion totale ou la stimulation continue — illustrent cette dynamique avec netteté. Elles produisent des expériences d’une grande puissance, mais ne configurent pas nécessairement un espace où ces expériences peuvent entrer en tension. Elles affectent sans instituer. Il en résulte moins une absence de culture qu’une prolifération sans scène. Il y a plus de sensible, mais moins de monde commun. La cratialité s’intensifie, sans rencontrer les conditions qui permettraient son inscription dans une forme de débat. - -Ce phénomène engage également une transformation du rapport à l’attention. L’intensification continue des stimuli, des images, des sollicitations affectives tend à produire une forme d’usure perceptive. Ce qui, dans d’autres régimes, aurait pu faire événement, devient une variation parmi d’autres dans un flux ininterrompu. L’expérience ne disparaît pas ; elle perd sa capacité à se déposer, à se reprendre, à s’inscrire dans une temporalité qui excède son surgissement. - -Il en résulte une difficulté accrue à distinguer ce qui mérite d’être tenu de ce qui peut être immédiatement absorbé. L’affect circule rapidement, mais il se stabilise difficilement. Il touche, mais ne transforme pas nécessairement. Il mobilise, mais ne structure pas. L’intensité, loin de renforcer la scène, peut ainsi contribuer à en fragiliser les conditions en empêchant la formation de seuils où le conflit pourrait être repris. - -Ce déplacement n’implique pas un appauvrissement du sensible ; il en modifie le régime. Le problème ne tient pas à un manque d’expérience, mais à l’impossibilité croissante de lui donner forme. Ce qui est éprouvé reste attaché à l’instant, sans toujours trouver les médiations nécessaires pour devenir partageable. La culture continue de produire des expériences puissantes ; elle peine davantage à en faire des formes durables de co-présence. - -Un troisième régime, plus discret mais plus décisif encore, apparaît lorsque les scènes existent, lorsque les dispositifs sont en place, lorsque la critique elle-même est explicitement valorisée, et que pourtant le conflit ne franchit pas le seuil de sa performativité. Rien ne manque ici en apparence. Il y a des lieux, des acteurs, des formats, des intentions critiques, des espaces d’expression. Pourtant, quelque chose se dérobe. Le dissensus est accueilli à condition de ne pas reconfigurer les structures qui l’accueillent. La parole critique est programmée, visible, parfois même célébrée ; elle n’altère ni les circuits de financement, ni les hiérarchies d’autorité, ni les conditions matérielles de la scène. - -Dans de telles configurations, la critique devient un contenu parmi d’autres. Elle est intégrée, mise en circulation, valorisée même, sans produire d’effet transformateur réellement palpable. Le conflit est présent, mais contenu dans un régime qui en limite la portée. La scène existe, mais elle ne permet pas que ce qui s’y exprime altère véritablement les conditions dans lesquelles elle est produite. Il serait trop simple d’y dénoncer une pure récupération. Ces dispositifs répondent souvent à des intentions sincères et à de réels besoins d’ouverture. Ils se heurtent cependant à des contraintes structurelles — économiques, institutionnelles, organisationnelles — qui limitent leur capacité archicrative. Il en résulte une situation paradoxale : une culture qui se donne comme critique, mais dont la critique est partiellement désactivée. L’archicration n’est pas absente ; elle est empêchée, canalisée dans des circuits qui communiquent mal entre eux. - -Cette configuration transforme en profondeur le statut même de la critique. Celle-ci ne disparaît pas ; elle change de régime. Elle devient visible, intégrée, parfois même attendue. Elle fait partie des formes légitimes de l’expression culturelle. Mais cette reconnaissance s’accompagne souvent d’un encadrement implicite qui en limite la portée. La critique est possible, à condition qu’elle demeure compatible avec les structures qui la rendent possible. - -Ce déplacement produit une forme de dissociation. D’un côté, les contenus critiques circulent, se diffusent, se renouvellent. De l’autre, les conditions matérielles, institutionnelles ou économiques qui organisent la scène demeurent relativement stables. La critique affecte les représentations ; elle atteint plus difficilement les structures. Elle ouvre des espaces d’expression ; elle transforme moins les conditions de leur production. - -Il en résulte une situation paradoxale dans laquelle la conflictualité est présente sans être pleinement opératoire. Le dissensus existe, mais il ne franchit pas toujours le seuil où il pourrait reconfigurer ce qui l’accueille. La scène ne se ferme pas ; elle se stabilise autour d’un régime où la contestation est admise sans être décisive. La culture donne alors à voir le conflit, mais elle peine à en faire un levier de transformation effective. - -Ces trois régimes ne désignent pas des catégories isolées, mais les manifestations d’une transformation plus générale : la désarticulation croissante entre formes, intensités et scènes. L’arcalité peut subsister sans conflictualité, la cratialité proliférer sans médiation, et l’archicration se fragiliser malgré la présence apparente de dispositifs ouverts. - -Le drame n’est donc pas celui d’une disparition de la culture, mais celui de sa transformation en régime non instituant. Une culture peut continuer à produire, à exprimer, à transmettre, tout en perdant sa capacité à faire tenir ensemble ce qui la traverse. Elle peut être riche, dynamique, inventive, et pourtant incapable d’instituer des formes où ses tensions deviennent durablement habitables. - -La problématique se déplace alors. Il ne s’agit plus de savoir ce que produit une société, mais dans quels régimes ce qu’elle produit devient matière de différend. Ce déplacement engage également la manière dont une société se perçoit elle-même comme monde commun. Car les formes culturelles ne se contentent pas de porter des conflits abstraits ; elles configurent des rapports de reconnaissance. Elles participent à déterminer qui apparaît, qui compte, qui est entendu, qui reste à la marge. Elles donnent forme à des expériences de dignité ou de mépris, d’appartenance ou d’exclusion, de visibilité ou d’effacement. - -Lorsqu’une culture parvient à instituer des scènes où ces expériences peuvent être exposées sans être immédiatement disqualifiées, elle contribue à maintenir une certaine consistance du commun. Les écarts ne disparaissent pas ; ils deviennent traversables. Les tensions ne s’éteignent pas ; elles trouvent des formes où elles peuvent être reprises sans se transformer en rupture pure. Une société peut alors continuer à se percevoir comme autre chose qu’une simple juxtaposition de trajectoires. - -À l’inverse, lorsque ces formes font défaut, le lien social tend à se fragiliser. Les expériences de relégation ou d’invisibilisation ne trouvent pas de scène où apparaître autrement que sous des formes fragmentées ou conflictuelles. Les groupes coexistent sans toujours partager des régimes de représentation communs. Le sentiment d’appartenance se délite, non nécessairement par disparition des liens, mais par difficulté à les inscrire dans des formes partagées. - -La question culturelle rejoint ici directement celle du social : non comme simple domaine distinct, mais comme condition de possibilité d’un “nous” qui ne soit ni fictif ni imposé. Ce “nous” ne préexiste pas aux formes qui le portent ; il se constitue à travers elles. Là où ces formes se défont, le commun ne disparaît pas entièrement, mais il devient plus difficile à éprouver comme tel. - -La question culturelle porte moins sur les contenus que sur les conditions de leur mise en forme et de leur advenue. C’est précisément ce déplacement qui fait basculer l’analyse dans le registre civilisationnel. Une civilisation ne se réduit ni à sa puissance de production ni à la sophistication de ses institutions. Elle se reconnaît à sa capacité à instituer des formes où ce qu’elle ne peut pas résoudre peut néanmoins être tenu. Là où cette capacité disparaît, les tensions ne cessent pas d’exister ; elles cessent d’être habitables. - -Il devient alors nécessaire d’interroger ce qui fait qu’une scène tient : non plus seulement les conditions de son apparition, mais celles de sa durée, de sa transmission, de sa capacité à porter le différend sans le dissoudre. - -Le diagnostic des régimes de désarchicration permet de comprendre ce qui se défait ; il ne suffit pas encore à saisir ce qui, malgré tout, peut tenir. Car une société ne se réduit jamais entièrement aux formes dominantes qui la traversent. Même lorsque les grandes scènes se fragilisent, même lorsque les dispositifs se saturent ou se neutralisent, quelque chose persiste — à bas bruit, de manière souvent précaire — comme possibilité de réouverture. Cette possibilité ne peut pourtant être pensée comme simple retour, ni comme restauration d’un âge antérieur des formes culturelles. Elle oblige au contraire à comprendre à quelles conditions une scène peut encore faire scène dans un monde où les régimes de visibilité, de temporalité et de conflictualité ont profondément changé. - -Une scène culturelle archicrative ne se définit pas d’abord par son statut institutionnel, ni par sa reconnaissance, ni même par son inscription dans un champ artistique ou patrimonial donné. Elle se définit par sa capacité à soutenir une opération précise : rendre possible une co-présence au différend sans que celui-ci soit immédiatement dissous, absorbé ou réduit. Elle n’est donc pas un lieu au sens simple ; elle est une configuration. - -Une telle scène exige d’abord un certain rapport au temps. Là où les régimes contemporains tendent à accélérer ou à compresser l’expérience, une scène archicrative institue un différé. Il ne s’agit pas d’un ralentissement abstrait, mais d’une temporalité dans laquelle ce qui surgit peut être repris, déplacé, reconfiguré. Le conflit n’y est ni immédiatement résolu ni purement évacué ; il est maintenu dans une forme qui permet sa traversée. Sans ce différé, il n’y a que réaction ou inertie. Avec lui, une élaboration devient possible. - -Ce différé, pourtant, ne suffit pas. Il doit être porté par des formes capables de soutenir l’écart sans le refermer. C’est ici qu’intervient la dimension symbolique au sens fort : non comme système de signes, mais comme capacité à figurer ce qui excède toute résolution immédiate. Une scène archicrative ne vise ni la clarification totale ni la transparence intégrale ; elle rend visible sans épuiser. Elle permet que des positions irréductibles coexistent sans être forcées à l’unisson. - -Sans figuration, ce qui affecte reste soit à l’état d’intensité brute, soit se trouve réduit à des catégories abstraites. Dans un cas, l’expérience déborde sans pouvoir être tenue ; dans l’autre, elle se trouve neutralisée par des formes trop générales pour en porter la singularité. La figuration ouvre un espace intermédiaire où ce qui excède toute résolution peut néanmoins apparaître sous une forme partageable, sans être ni dissous ni rigidifié. - -Encore faut-il que cette co-présence soit portée par un régime d’adresse. Car un différend n’existe pas simplement parce qu’il est exprimé ; il existe parce qu’il est adressé dans une forme qui le rend recevable sans le normaliser entièrement. Une scène archicrative ne garantit pas la reconnaissance, mais elle ouvre la possibilité d’une écoute qui ne soit pas immédiatement capturée par les formats dominants de validation. Elle ne supprime pas les asymétries ; elle les expose dans une forme où elles peuvent être disputées. - -Reste une condition plus exigeante encore : une telle scène suppose une certaine incomplétude. Elle ne peut pas être saturée. Elle ne peut pas coïncider parfaitement avec son propre sens. Il demeure toujours un écart entre l’expérience vécue et sa formalisation. Dès qu’une scène prétend contenir entièrement ce qu’elle met en forme, elle cesse d’être opératoire ; elle devient message, dispositif de communication ou outil de légitimation. Pour qu’elle reste vivante, il faut qu’elle laisse place à ce qui n’est pas encore institué et qui doit pourtant la traverser. - -Une forme saturée, qui prétend contenir entièrement ce qu’elle expose, ne laisse plus place à ce qui pourrait la déplacer. Elle devient un message stabilisé, un dispositif clos, incapable d’accueillir ce qui la déborde. L’incomplétude, au contraire, maintient une ouverture. Elle rend possible l’irruption de ce qui n’était pas prévu, de ce qui n’était pas encore institué. Elle empêche la coïncidence totale entre la forme et son sens, condition nécessaire pour que la scène reste opératoire. - -Différé, figuration, adresse, incomplétude : ces conditions ne composent pas un modèle idéal. Elles décrivent le régime minimal à partir duquel une scène peut commencer à faire tenir un différend. Elles permettent aussi de comprendre pourquoi certaines configurations, même modestes, parviennent à instituer quelque chose que des dispositifs beaucoup plus puissants échouent à produire. - -On en trouve des manifestations dans des contextes très différents, souvent éloignés des centres institutionnels dominants. Des collectifs qui travaillent à partir de mémoires fragmentées, de langues minorées, de récits contradictoires peuvent parfois faire émerger des formes où ce qui ne trouvait pas place ailleurs devient partageable. Ce qui importe alors n’est pas seulement le contenu de ce qui est dit, mais la manière dont cela est tenu : un espace où plusieurs voix peuvent se répondre sans être immédiatement hiérarchisées, un dispositif où le récit n’est pas sommé de se conformer à une cohérence préalable, une forme où l’expérience peut apparaître sans être aussitôt réduite. - -De même, certaines pratiques de réouverture d’archives ou de reconfiguration de récits historiques ne valent pas seulement comme gestes de restitution. Elles instituent des scènes où les conditions mêmes de la visibilité du passé deviennent disputables. L’archive cesse d’être un dépôt ; elle devient un lieu de conflit. Une telle transformation n’est possible que si une forme permet de porter ce conflit au-delà de la simple dénonciation. - -Ces configurations ont en commun de ne pas partir d’un universel déjà donné. Elles n’appliquent pas un cadre préexistant ; elles produisent les conditions d’une mise en relation. Elles ne cherchent pas d’abord à résoudre les différences ; elles travaillent à les rendre traversables. En ce sens, elles engagent une autre compréhension de l’universalité. - -L’universel n’y apparaît plus comme un principe abstrait auquel il faudrait se conformer, ni comme une simple addition de singularités. Il se forme dans l’épreuve même de la comparution. Il n’est pas ce qui précède la scène ; il est ce qui peut en émerger lorsque des positions irréductibles parviennent à se tenir ensemble sans se dissoudre. - -Une telle universalité reste nécessairement fragile. Elle ne s’impose pas. Elle ne se décrète pas. Elle dépend de la capacité des formes à soutenir cette co-présence. Elle peut échouer, se refermer, se rigidifier. Mais elle constitue néanmoins l’un des seuls modes possibles de dépassement des fragmentations contemporaines sans retomber dans l’imposition d’un cadre unique. - -La question culturelle rejoint alors pleinement la question civilisationnelle. Ce qui est en jeu n’est plus seulement la capacité à produire des scènes locales de viabilisation des tensions, mais la possibilité de leur articulation. Une civilisation ne se définit pas par l’existence de scènes isolées, aussi riches soient-elles, mais par la manière dont ces scènes peuvent entrer en relation sans se neutraliser. Autrement dit, par la capacité à faire tenir une pluralité de formes sans les réduire à une unité forcée ni les abandonner à la dispersion. - -Or c’est précisément cette articulation qui fait aujourd’hui défaut. Les scènes existent, parfois avec une grande intensité, mais elles peinent à se relier. Elles restent situées, fragmentées, difficilement transmissibles au-delà de leur contexte immédiat. Elles ouvrent des seuils ; elles ne composent pas encore. - -La question n’est donc pas seulement celle de la production de scènes, mais celle de leur écologie. Une écologie archicratique des scènes culturelles ne viserait ni l’unification, ni la standardisation, ni la simple mise en réseau. Elle supposerait la capacité à maintenir des différences de régime tout en permettant des passages. Non pas une traduction totale, mais des formes de médiation qui n’effacent pas les écarts. Non pas une harmonisation, mais une articulation. - -Une telle exigence transforme profondément la manière de penser la culture. Elle ne peut plus être envisagée comme un domaine à protéger ou à développer, mais comme un ensemble de conditions à instituer et à maintenir. Elle ne relève plus seulement de politiques publiques, aussi nécessaires soient-elles, mais d’une attention portée aux formes mêmes dans lesquelles le monde devient partageable. - -La culture cesse alors d’apparaître comme un supplément. Elle devient le plan sur lequel se joue la possibilité même d’un monde commun — non pas un monde réconcilié, mais un monde encore habitable dans sa conflictualité. - -Et c’est en ce sens qu’elle constitue le seuil civilisationnel. - -Il faut ici lever une dernière équivoque. Dire que la culture constitue un seuil civilisationnel ne revient nullement à l’ériger en refuge noble face à la brutalité des autres sphères, ni à la traiter comme le luxe suprême des sociétés apaisées. C’est presque l’inverse qui est vrai. La culture devient décisive précisément lorsque les autres régimes de régulation montrent leurs limites. C’est lorsque le droit ne suffit plus à faire comparaître, lorsque la politique peine à faire tenir la division, lorsque l’économie organise sans légitimer, lorsque la technique transforme sans être habitée, lorsque les médias rendent visible sans rendre transmissible, que la question des formes devient irréductible. On mesure alors la différence entre une société fonctionnelle et un monde habitable. Une société fonctionnelle peut encore calculer, archiver, distribuer, optimiser, conserver et divertir. Un monde habitable exige davantage : des formes où ce qui blesse, divise, déborde ou menace peut être porté sans être nié. - -La culture n’est donc pas ici le dernier chapitre par convenance ; elle est l’épreuve terminale. Non parce qu’elle résoudrait ce que les autres tensions n’ont pas su résoudre, mais parce qu’elle révèle si un collectif dispose encore des formes nécessaires pour n’être livré ni à la pure gestion ni à la pure déflagration. Une civilisation ne se juge peut-être jamais aussi clairement que dans les formes qu’elle se donne pour ne pas sombrer tout à fait dans l’insignifiance de ses propres conflits. - -Une telle distinction permet de mieux saisir ce qui se joue à ce niveau. Une société peut continuer à fonctionner sans disposer de scènes capables de porter ses tensions. Elle peut organiser ses flux, maintenir ses institutions, réguler ses interactions, produire des formes d’expression multiples. Elle peut même donner l’impression d’une vitalité culturelle intense. Pourtant, cette activité ne suffit pas à garantir qu’elle se tienne comme monde. - -Il est possible qu’une société demeure fonctionnelle tout en devenant de moins en moins habitable symboliquement. Les conflits y persistent, parfois avec une intensité accrue, mais ils ne trouvent plus les formes dans lesquelles ils pourraient être partagés sans se transformer en fragmentation. Les expériences se multiplient, mais elles ne composent pas. Les discours circulent, mais ils ne se rencontrent pas. Ce qui se défait alors n’est pas l’activité sociale elle-même, mais la possibilité de l’éprouver comme monde commun. - -Une telle situation ne se traduit pas nécessairement par un effondrement visible. Elle peut coexister avec une grande efficacité organisationnelle, une forte productivité, une richesse d’initiatives culturelles. Mais elle introduit une fragilité plus profonde : celle d’un collectif qui ne parvient plus à donner forme à ce qui le traverse. Il peut encore durer, fonctionner, s’adapter ; il lui devient plus difficile de se reconnaître, de se représenter, de se reprendre. - -C’est à ce point que la question culturelle prend toute sa portée. Elle ne désigne pas un supplément ou un raffinement, mais la condition sous laquelle une société peut encore se soutenir comme monde. Là où cette condition vacille, ce n’est pas seulement un domaine qui s’affaiblit ; c’est la capacité même d’habiter les tensions qui se trouve compromise. - -Il devient alors possible de reprendre l’ensemble du chapitre dans une seule ligne de force. Les tensions économiques, écologiques, sociales, politiques, psychiques, médiatiques, techniques, géopolitiques et cosmopolitiques ne désignaient pas des domaines séparés, mais des variations d’un même problème : celui de la possibilité de faire tenir un monde traversé par des forces hétérogènes, irréductibles, souvent contradictoires. À chaque niveau apparaissait la même exigence : non supprimer les tensions, ni les équilibrer abstraitement, mais instituer des formes où elles puissent être exposées, différées, disputées sans se transformer immédiatement en destruction. Aucune de ces tensions ne devient habitable par elle-même. - -Une économie peut redistribuer sans apaiser. Une écologie peut préserver sans faire monde. Une politique peut décider sans être reconnue. Une technique peut fonctionner sans être habitée. Une mémoire peut conserver sans être reprise. Un droit peut qualifier sans faire comparaître. Une scène cosmopolitique peut s’ouvrir sans être tenue. Dans tous les cas, ce qui manque, lorsque cela manque, n’est pas d’abord une règle, une institution ou un savoir. C’est une forme. - -Non pas une forme décorative, mais une forme capable de porter ce qui excède toute résolution immédiate ; une forme où le conflit peut apparaître sans être absorbé dans la gestion, la polarisation ou la disparition. C’est précisément cette fonction que la culture, entendue en son sens archicratique, rend possible. Elle n’ajoute pas un supplément au monde ; elle lui donne encore la possibilité d’apparaître comme monde, certes disputé, mais viable. C’est pourquoi elle constitue ici le seuil civilisationnel décisif. Une société peut continuer à produire, administrer, optimiser, sécuriser, patrimonialiser ; si elle perd la capacité d’instituer des formes où ce qui la traverse peut être tenu, elle cesse progressivement de se soutenir comme monde. - -Une civilisation ne tient pas en éliminant le tragique. +En juin 2020, au plus fort des mobilisations consécutives à la mort de +George Floyd, la statue d'Edward Colston est renversée à Bristol, +traînée dans les rues puis jetée dans le port. La scène est filmée, +relayée instantanément à l'échelle mondiale, commentée, reprise, +contestée. Certains y voient un acte de justice symbolique tardive. +D'autres dénoncent une destruction du patrimoine, un geste d'effacement, +une violence contre l'histoire. Quelques mois plus tard, la statue est +repêchée, exposée dans un musée, couchée, conservée avec les traces de +peinture et de corde. Elle devient à son tour scène de litige. + +Rien, dans cette séquence, ne peut être réduit à un simple affrontement +d'opinions. Il ne s'y joue pas seulement un conflit mémoriel, ni même +une controverse politique classique. Ce qui s'y donne à voir est une +instabilité plus profonde : celle des formes par lesquelles une société +rend visible, contestable et transmissible ce qui la divise. La statue +cesse d'être seulement un monument ; elle devient un opérateur de +conflit. L'espace public cesse d'être un simple lieu de circulation ; il +devient scène de renversement. Le musée, à son tour, ne se borne plus à +conserver : il reconfigure le litige dans un autre régime de +temporalité, de légitimité et de réception. Quant à l'histoire, elle +perd sa fausse évidence de récit stabilisé ; elle redevient matière +disputée. + +Le conflit surgit avec force, mais les formes capables de le porter +durablement restent incertaines. Le geste est spectaculaire, +immédiatement visible, mondialement relayé ; sa transformation en +différend transmissible demeure fragile. Rien n'est résolu. Tout est +déplacé, sans que ce déplacement garantisse encore une scène habitable. +La séquence de Bristol ne met donc pas seulement aux prises deux +lectures antagonistes d'un même objet — mémoire réparatrice contre +destruction patrimoniale, justice symbolique contre effacement de +l'histoire. Elle révèle plus profondément la difficulté croissante à +instituer des formes où une société puisse reprendre ce qui, en elle, +demeure historiquement non réconcilié. La tension culturelle apparaît +déjà ici comme tension civilisationnelle : non la querelle autour d'un +objet, mais l'épreuve d'un monde qui ne sait plus spontanément dans +quelles formes porter ses propres fractures. + +Ce qui se joue ici ne se laisse pas réduire à la seule succession +d'événements. La séquence articule en réalité plusieurs régimes de scène +qui ne coïncident pas. Le monument relevait d'un ordre de stabilisation +: il inscrivait dans la pierre une continuité supposée, naturalisait une +certaine lecture du passé, rendait silencieuses les tensions qui +l'avaient rendu possible. La rue, au contraire, opère comme espace de +réadressage : elle expose ce qui était tenu pour acquis, le soumet à une +reprise conflictuelle, transforme un héritage en enjeu disputable. Le +musée, enfin, n'annule ni l'un ni l'autre ; il reconfigure. Il capture +le geste, en modifie la temporalité, transforme l'événement en archive +active, en objet de médiation, en surface de réinterprétation. + +Ces trois régimes ne s'annulent pas ; ils entrent en tension. Aucun ne +suffit à lui seul à instituer une scène pleinement habitable. Le +monument stabilise au prix d'un refoulement. La rue révèle au prix d'une +intensité difficile à soutenir. Le musée conserve au prix d'un +déplacement qui peut aussi neutraliser. Entre ces pôles, la question +demeure ouverte : dans quelle forme ce qui a été rendu visible peut-il +encore être repris sans être soit figé, soit dissipé ? + +Il faut alors distinguer deux niveaux que la séquence tend à confondre +sans les résoudre : celui de la visibilité et celui de la tenue. +L'événement est visible, immédiatement, massivement, globalement. Mais +cette visibilité ne garantit en rien sa transformation en différend +transmissible. Elle expose ; elle ne suffit pas à porter. Elle rend +perceptible ; elle ne stabilise pas nécessairement une forme où le +conflit puisse être repris, partagé, travaillé dans la durée. + +C'est à ce point précis que la tension culturelle se révèle dans toute +son ampleur. Le problème ne réside pas dans l'absence de formes, mais +dans leur discordance. Les formes existent, mais elles ne s'articulent +plus spontanément en une scène capable de porter ce qui apparaît. La +culture ne manque pas d'expression ; elle peine à configurer des régimes +de reprise. Et c'est cette difficulté, déjà lisible dans la séquence de +Bristol, qui se déploiera dans l'ensemble de ce qui suit. + +La leçon est incisive. La culture n'est pas d'abord ce qui représente un +monde ; elle rend possible l'apparition disputable de ce qui le +traverse. Elle ne se réduit ni aux œuvres, ni aux institutions, ni aux +productions symboliques. Elle désigne le régime de formes par lequel une +société peut encore faire quelque chose de ce qui la divise. + +Or c'est précisément cette capacité qui se trouve aujourd'hui +fragilisée. + +Les conflits culturels ne manquent pas. Ils prolifèrent même. Statues +déboulonnées, noms de rues contestés, programmes scolaires disputés, +œuvres censurées ou réinterprétées, archives réouvertes, récits +concurrents, mémoires antagonistes : partout les signes d'une +conflictualité symbolique réactivée se multiplient. Pourtant, cette +intensification ne produit pas nécessairement plus de scènes. Elle +engendre souvent des surgissements sans tenue, des affrontements sans +médiation, des visibilités sans transduction. Le conflit apparaît, mais +ne se stabilise pas dans une forme partageable. Il circule, mais ne se +transmet pas. Il mobilise, mais ne configure pas durablement un espace +de co-présence. + +C'est ici que la section précédente trouve son point de bascule. Le +cosmopolitique, nous l'avons vu, se heurte à la difficulté d'instituer +des scènes où des expériences hétérogènes puissent apparaître sans être +immédiatement reformattées par les conditions de leur recevabilité. Mais +cette difficulté ne relève pas seulement des dispositifs juridiques, +administratifs ou politiques. Elle touche un plan plus profond : celui +des formes capables de porter ce qui apparaît. Une scène ne tient pas +seulement par ses règles. Elle tient par ses formes. Lorsque ces formes +se fragilisent, même les dispositifs les plus ouverts deviennent +insuffisants. Le conflit surgit, mais ne trouve pas le régime dans +lequel il pourrait devenir différend. L'apparition a lieu, mais elle ne +devient pas habitable. + +La culture doit alors être reprise, non comme domaine, mais comme +condition. Il ne s'agit pas ici d'un patrimoine, d'un secteur ou d'une +production de contenus. Il s'agit du milieu instituant de la +conflictualité symbolique : du plan transductif par lequel une société +rend ses tensions sensibles, transmissibles et disputables. La culture +n'exprime pas un monde déjà constitué. Elle est ce par quoi ce monde +peut encore se former. + +Une telle requalification oblige à relire l'ensemble du chapitre. Les +tensions économiques, écologiques, sociales, politiques, psychiques, +médiatiques, techniques, géopolitiques et cosmopolitiques ne deviennent +habitables qu'à travers des formes capables de les porter. Sans elles, +elles ne disparaissent pas ; elles se déchaînent ou se dissolvent. + +Il faut même aller plus loin. Si la culture constitue ici un seuil +ultime, ce n'est pas parce qu'elle surplomberait abstraitement les +autres tensions, mais parce qu'elle en recueille la mise en forme +sensible, narrative et symbolique. L'économique ne produit pas seulement +des inégalités, des flux et des dettes ; il produit aussi des +imaginaires de réussite, de mérite, de frustration et de relégation, +sans lesquels les distributions matérielles elles-mêmes ne seraient pas +vécues comme justes, insupportables ou contestables. L'écologique engage +bien davantage que des ressources, des milieux et des limites ; il +engage des manières de sentir la perte, d'éprouver l'irréversibilité, de +se rapporter au vivant, d'habiter ou non un monde menacé. Le social +excède la seule distribution des places, des revenus ou des protections +: il engage des formes de reconnaissance, des seuils de visibilité, des +expériences de mépris, d'abandon, d'humiliation ou d'appartenance, sans +lesquelles une société ne sait plus si elle tient encore comme monde +partagé ou si elle se défait en coexistences inégalement tolérées. Le +politique ne tient jamais par ses seules institutions ; il dépend de +scènes où la division peut apparaître sans être rabattue sur l'ennemi +absolu ou sur la pure administration. Le psychique excède lui aussi la +seule intériorité : une souffrance ne devient traversable que si des +formes existent pour la symboliser, la raconter, l'inscrire dans autre +chose qu'un isolement opaque. Le médiatique configure les régimes de +vitesse, d'attention, de saturation ou d'érosion par lesquels une +société éprouve ses propres conflits. Le technique transforme non +seulement les procédures, mais les formats perceptifs eux-mêmes, les +seuils de présence, les régimes d'évidence, les manières de croire qu'un +monde est encore habitable. Le géopolitique travaille les récits de +légitimité, les dramaturgies de puissance, les formes de l'ennemi, les +imaginaires du centre et de la périphérie. Le cosmopolitique, enfin, +engage les conditions sous lesquelles un tort peut devenir recevable à +l'échelle du monde sans être mutilé par les cadres censés l'accueillir. +À chaque niveau, la culture constitue ainsi le plan où les tensions +peuvent être figurées, transmises, disputées ou, au contraire, +neutralisées. La question culturelle n'arrive donc pas au terme du +chapitre comme un supplément d'âme ou comme une simple ouverture finale. +Elle apparaît comme le plan où toutes les tensions précédentes révèlent +leur dépendance à l'égard des formes qui les portent. + +L'intuition d'Edgar Morin prend alors tout son poids. Une culture +vivante n'est pas un stock de signes, mais un tissu capable d'intégrer +ses propres perturbations sans les abolir. Elle tient parce qu'elle sait +faire circuler, symboliser et retravailler ses conflits. Une telle +capacité dépend pourtant de formes concrètes, de scènes, de dispositifs. +Elle dépend, au sens rigoureux du terme, d'une archicration. + +C'est précisément cette archicration culturelle qui se désactive. Les +formes subsistent. Les intensités prolifèrent. Mais leur articulation +disputable se fragilise. La question doit dès lors être reformulée à son +niveau exact : il ne s'agit plus seulement de savoir si une société +produit de la culture, mais si elle dispose encore de formes où ce qui +la divise peut être tenu sans être immédiatement détruit ou neutralisé. + +À ce stade, le problème change de nature. Il cesse d'être sectoriel. Il +devient civilisationnel. Une civilisation ne se définit pas uniquement +par ce qu'elle produit, conserve ou administre. Elle se définit aussi +par sa capacité à donner forme à ce qui la traverse. Elle tient dans la +mesure où elle parvient à rendre partageable ce qui pourrait la +déchirer. La question décisive devient alors la suivante : dans quelles +formes un monde peut-il encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde +disputable ? + +La question culturelle doit donc être reprise comme interrogation sur +les régimes dans lesquels une production symbolique est prise, +c'est-à-dire sur les conditions sous lesquelles elle peut, ou non, +instituer une scène. Or ces régimes ne se distribuent pas de manière +homogène. Ils dessinent au contraire des configurations récurrentes où +l'articulation entre formes, intensités et scènes se trouve altérée. Ce +qui se fragilise, ce n'est pas la culture elle-même, mais sa capacité à +faire tenir ensemble ces dimensions. C'est à partir de cette +désarticulation qu'il devient possible de décrire les formes +contemporaines de désarchicration culturelle. + +Un premier régime se laisse reconnaître là où les formes subsistent, +parfois avec une remarquable stabilité, mais sans être véritablement +traversées par une conflictualité vivante. Les institutions culturelles +assurent leurs fonctions, les dispositifs de transmission restent en +place, les œuvres circulent, les archives s'accumulent, les +commémorations se déploient avec précision. Rien, en apparence, ne +manque. Pourtant, ce qui faisait de ces formes autre chose que de +simples supports de conservation tend à s'éroder. Le passé est présenté +sans être réellement repris ; la mémoire est mobilisée sans être remise +en tension ; la transmission opère sans rouvrir les conflits qui lui +donnaient sens. Ce qui se perd ici n'est pas la forme, mais sa capacité +à engager ce qu'elle transmet dans une épreuve commune. On visite, on +apprend, on est parfois ému ; rien n'oblige pourtant la mémoire à +redevenir épreuve. Les fractures sont nommées, non rouvertes. La forme +protège le passé plus qu'elle ne l'expose à une reprise. + +Ce déplacement produit un effet plus subtil encore. À mesure que les +formes gagnent en stabilité, elles acquièrent une forme d'autorité +tranquille qui les rend d'autant moins contestables. Elles continuent +d'organiser le rapport au passé, mais elles le font sous un régime qui +privilégie la continuité plutôt que la tension. Le passé apparaît comme +partagé précisément parce qu'il n'est plus suffisamment disputé. Il +devient un bien commun pacifié, dont la fonction principale consiste +moins à ouvrir des fractures qu'à garantir une certaine cohérence +symbolique. + +Dans ce contexte, la reconnaissance elle-même peut devenir ambiguë. +Reconnaître un passé, le nommer, l'exposer, lui donner une place dans +l'espace public ou institutionnel ne signifie pas nécessairement le +remettre en jeu. Il est possible de reconnaître sans rouvrir, de +transmettre sans exposer, de conserver sans engager. Ce qui se perd +alors, ce n'est pas la mémoire, mais sa capacité à obliger. Elle +informe, elle sensibilise, elle éduque parfois ; elle ne met plus +nécessairement à l'épreuve. + +Une telle configuration tend à produire des formes culturellement +valorisées, institutionnellement solides, socialement acceptées, mais +dont la puissance instituante s'est affaiblie. Elles assurent la +continuité, mais ne provoquent plus la reprise. Elles stabilisent, mais +ne déplacent plus. Leur efficacité tient à leur capacité à pacifier le +rapport au passé ; leur limite tient à leur incapacité croissante à en +faire une matière vivante de conflit partagé. + +On aurait tort d'y voir seulement un programme délibéré de +neutralisation. Ce régime répond aussi à des exigences réelles : rendre +accessible, stabiliser, protéger, transmettre. Mais c'est dans cette +stabilisation même que s'opère le déplacement. À mesure que les formes +se sécurisent, leur puissance instituante peut se réduire. La mémoire +devient surface d'exposition, le patrimoine évidence partagée, la +transmission répétition. La culture cesse alors d'être un opérateur de +mise en tension pour devenir un régime de stabilisation. Elle continue +d'organiser le rapport au passé, mais ne permet plus nécessairement d'en +rouvrir les fractures. Les grandes commémorations contemporaines rendent +cette transformation particulièrement visible. Elles mobilisent des +ressources considérables, déploient des dispositifs sophistiqués, +intègrent parfois des voix multiples. Elles tendent pourtant à +contourner ce qui ferait véritablement litige : les violences encore +actives, les hiérarchies d'expérience, les héritages inégalement +transmissibles. Le conflit n'est pas nié frontalement ; il est déplacé +hors de la scène. La forme demeure, mais sa puissance de reprise +s'affaiblit. L'arcalité subsiste ; son tranchant instituant s'émousse. + +Un second régime se caractérise, à l'inverse, non par un manque, mais +par une surabondance. Ici, l'intensité prolifère. Les affects circulent +avec rapidité, les images se multiplient, les dispositifs immersifs se +densifient, les formats culturels sollicitent fortement la présence et +l'émotion. Tout semble plus immédiat, plus engageant, plus sensible. +Cette intensification ne produit pourtant pas davantage de scène. Elle +tend au contraire à comprimer le temps symbolique nécessaire à la +formation d'un différend. + +Dans ces configurations, l'expérience est souvent forte, parfois +bouleversante. On entre, on est enveloppé, sollicité, déplacé, parfois +même saisi ; mais l'expérience s'épuise dans son propre présent et ne +laisse pas place à ce qui permettrait sa reprise. Il manque un seuil, +une distance, un rituel. L'intensité se consomme dans son surgissement. +L'affect circule, mais ne se stabilise pas dans une forme partageable. +Ce qui est éprouvé reste attaché à l'instant de son apparition. Le +rapport entre sensible et symbolique s'en trouve profondément déplacé : +lorsque l'intensité n'est pas médiatisée, elle ne peut pas être reprise +collectivement. Elle demeure fragmentée, non transductive. Certaines +formes culturelles contemporaines — notamment celles qui privilégient +l'immersion totale ou la stimulation continue — illustrent cette +dynamique avec netteté. Elles produisent des expériences d'une grande +puissance, mais ne configurent pas nécessairement un espace où ces +expériences peuvent entrer en tension. Elles affectent sans instituer. +Il en résulte moins une absence de culture qu'une prolifération sans +scène. Il y a plus de sensible, mais moins de monde commun. La +cratialité s'intensifie, sans rencontrer les conditions qui +permettraient son inscription dans une forme de débat. + +Ce phénomène engage également une transformation du rapport à +l'attention. L'intensification continue des stimuli, des images, des +sollicitations affectives tend à produire une forme d'usure perceptive. +Ce qui, dans d'autres régimes, aurait pu faire événement, devient une +variation parmi d'autres dans un flux ininterrompu. L'expérience ne +disparaît pas ; elle perd sa capacité à se déposer, à se reprendre, à +s'inscrire dans une temporalité qui excède son surgissement. + +Il en résulte une difficulté accrue à distinguer ce qui mérite d'être +tenu de ce qui peut être immédiatement absorbé. L'affect circule +rapidement, mais il se stabilise difficilement. Il touche, mais ne +transforme pas nécessairement. Il mobilise, mais ne structure pas. +L'intensité, loin de renforcer la scène, peut ainsi contribuer à en +fragiliser les conditions en empêchant la formation de seuils où le +conflit pourrait être repris. + +Ce déplacement n'implique pas un appauvrissement du sensible ; il en +modifie le régime. Le problème ne tient pas à un manque d'expérience, +mais à l'impossibilité croissante de lui donner forme. Ce qui est +éprouvé reste attaché à l'instant, sans toujours trouver les médiations +nécessaires pour devenir partageable. La culture continue de produire +des expériences puissantes ; elle peine davantage à en faire des formes +durables de co-présence. + +Un troisième régime, plus discret mais plus décisif encore, apparaît +lorsque les scènes existent, lorsque les dispositifs sont en place, +lorsque la critique elle-même est explicitement valorisée, et que +pourtant le conflit ne franchit pas le seuil de sa performativité. Rien +ne manque ici en apparence. Il y a des lieux, des acteurs, des formats, +des intentions critiques, des espaces d'expression. Pourtant, quelque +chose se dérobe. Le dissensus est accueilli à condition de ne pas +reconfigurer les structures qui l'accueillent. La parole critique est +programmée, visible, parfois même célébrée ; elle n'altère ni les +circuits de financement, ni les hiérarchies d'autorité, ni les +conditions matérielles de la scène. + +Dans de telles configurations, la critique devient un contenu parmi +d'autres. Elle est intégrée, mise en circulation, valorisée même, sans +produire d'effet transformateur réellement palpable. Le conflit est +présent, mais contenu dans un régime qui en limite la portée. La scène +existe, mais elle ne permet pas que ce qui s'y exprime altère +véritablement les conditions dans lesquelles elle est produite. Il +serait trop simple d'y dénoncer une pure récupération. Ces dispositifs +répondent souvent à des intentions sincères et à de réels besoins +d'ouverture. Ils se heurtent cependant à des contraintes structurelles — économiques, institutionnelles, organisationnelles — qui limitent +leur capacité archicrative. Il en résulte une situation paradoxale : une +culture qui se donne comme critique, mais dont la critique est +partiellement désactivée. L'archicration n'est pas absente ; elle est +empêchée, canalisée dans des circuits qui communiquent mal entre eux. + +Cette configuration transforme en profondeur le statut même de la +critique. Celle-ci ne disparaît pas ; elle change de régime. Elle +devient visible, intégrée, parfois même attendue. Elle fait partie des +formes légitimes de l'expression culturelle. Mais cette reconnaissance +s'accompagne souvent d'un encadrement implicite qui en limite la portée. +La critique est possible, à condition qu'elle demeure compatible avec +les structures qui la rendent possible. + +Ce déplacement produit une forme de dissociation. D'un côté, les +contenus critiques circulent, se diffusent, se renouvellent. De l'autre, +les conditions matérielles, institutionnelles ou économiques qui +organisent la scène demeurent relativement stables. La critique affecte +les représentations ; elle atteint plus difficilement les structures. +Elle ouvre des espaces d'expression ; elle transforme moins les +conditions de leur production. + +Il en résulte une situation paradoxale dans laquelle la conflictualité +est présente sans être pleinement opératoire. Le dissensus existe, mais +il ne franchit pas toujours le seuil où il pourrait reconfigurer ce qui +l'accueille. La scène ne se ferme pas ; elle se stabilise autour d'un +régime où la contestation est admise sans être décisive. La culture +donne alors à voir le conflit, mais elle peine à en faire un levier de +transformation effective. + +Ces trois régimes ne désignent pas des catégories isolées, mais les +manifestations d'une transformation plus générale : la désarticulation +croissante entre formes, intensités et scènes. L'arcalité peut subsister +sans conflictualité, la cratialité proliférer sans médiation, et +l'archicration se fragiliser malgré la présence apparente de dispositifs +ouverts. + +Le drame n'est donc pas celui d'une disparition de la culture, mais +celui de sa transformation en régime non instituant. Une culture peut +continuer à produire, à exprimer, à transmettre, tout en perdant sa +capacité à faire tenir ensemble ce qui la traverse. Elle peut être +riche, dynamique, inventive, et pourtant incapable d'instituer des +formes où ses tensions deviennent durablement habitables. + +La problématique se déplace alors. Il ne s'agit plus de savoir ce que +produit une société, mais dans quels régimes ce qu'elle produit devient +matière de différend. Ce déplacement engage également la manière dont +une société se perçoit elle-même comme monde commun. Car les formes +culturelles ne se contentent pas de porter des conflits abstraits ; +elles configurent des rapports de reconnaissance. Elles participent à +déterminer qui apparaît, qui compte, qui est entendu, qui reste à la +marge. Elles donnent forme à des expériences de dignité ou de mépris, +d'appartenance ou d'exclusion, de visibilité ou d'effacement. + +Lorsqu'une culture parvient à instituer des scènes où ces expériences +peuvent être exposées sans être immédiatement disqualifiées, elle +contribue à maintenir une certaine consistance du commun. Les écarts ne +disparaissent pas ; ils deviennent traversables. Les tensions ne +s'éteignent pas ; elles trouvent des formes où elles peuvent être +reprises sans se transformer en rupture pure. Une société peut alors +continuer à se percevoir comme autre chose qu'une simple juxtaposition +de trajectoires. + +À l'inverse, lorsque ces formes font défaut, le lien social tend à se +fragiliser. Les expériences de relégation ou d'invisibilisation ne +trouvent pas de scène où apparaître autrement que sous des formes +fragmentées ou conflictuelles. Les groupes coexistent sans toujours +partager des régimes de représentation communs. Le sentiment +d'appartenance se délite, non nécessairement par disparition des liens, +mais par difficulté à les inscrire dans des formes partagées. + +La question culturelle rejoint ici directement celle du social : non +comme simple domaine distinct, mais comme condition de possibilité d'un +"nous" qui ne soit ni fictif ni imposé. Ce "nous" ne préexiste pas aux +formes qui le portent ; il se constitue à travers elles. Là où ces +formes se défont, le commun ne disparaît pas entièrement, mais il +devient plus difficile à éprouver comme tel. + +La question culturelle porte moins sur les contenus que sur les +conditions de leur mise en forme et de leur advenue. C'est précisément +ce déplacement qui fait basculer l'analyse dans le registre +civilisationnel. Une civilisation ne se réduit ni à sa puissance de +production ni à la sophistication de ses institutions. Elle se reconnaît +à sa capacité à instituer des formes où ce qu'elle ne peut pas résoudre +peut néanmoins être tenu. Là où cette capacité disparaît, les tensions +ne cessent pas d'exister ; elles cessent d'être habitables. + +Il devient alors nécessaire d'interroger ce qui fait qu'une scène tient +: non plus seulement les conditions de son apparition, mais celles de sa +durée, de sa transmission, de sa capacité à porter le différend sans le +dissoudre. + +Le diagnostic des régimes de désarchicration permet de comprendre ce qui +se défait ; il ne suffit pas encore à saisir ce qui, malgré tout, peut +tenir. Car une société ne se réduit jamais entièrement aux formes +dominantes qui la traversent. Même lorsque les grandes scènes se +fragilisent, même lorsque les dispositifs se saturent ou se +neutralisent, quelque chose persiste — à bas bruit, de manière souvent +précaire — comme possibilité de réouverture. Cette possibilité ne peut +pourtant être pensée comme simple retour, ni comme restauration d'un âge +antérieur des formes culturelles. Elle oblige au contraire à comprendre +à quelles conditions une scène peut encore faire scène dans un monde où +les régimes de visibilité, de temporalité et de conflictualité ont +profondément changé. + +Une scène culturelle archicrative ne se définit pas d'abord par son +statut institutionnel, ni par sa reconnaissance, ni même par son +inscription dans un champ artistique ou patrimonial donné. Elle se +définit par sa capacité à soutenir une opération précise : rendre +possible une co-présence au différend sans que celui-ci soit +immédiatement dissous, absorbé ou réduit. Elle n'est donc pas un lieu au +sens simple ; elle est une configuration. + +Une telle scène exige d'abord un certain rapport au temps. Là où les +régimes contemporains tendent à accélérer ou à compresser l'expérience, +une scène archicrative institue un différé. Il ne s'agit pas d'un +ralentissement abstrait, mais d'une temporalité dans laquelle ce qui +surgit peut être repris, déplacé, reconfiguré. Le conflit n'y est ni +immédiatement résolu ni purement évacué ; il est maintenu dans une forme +qui permet sa traversée. Sans ce différé, il n'y a que réaction ou +inertie. Avec lui, une élaboration devient possible. + +Ce différé, pourtant, ne suffit pas. Il doit être porté par des formes +capables de soutenir l'écart sans le refermer. C'est ici qu'intervient +la dimension symbolique au sens fort : non comme système de signes, mais +comme capacité à figurer ce qui excède toute résolution immédiate. Une +scène archicrative ne vise ni la clarification totale ni la transparence +intégrale ; elle rend visible sans épuiser. Elle permet que des +positions irréductibles coexistent sans être forcées à l'unisson. + +Sans figuration, ce qui affecte reste soit à l'état d'intensité brute, +soit se trouve réduit à des catégories abstraites. Dans un cas, +l'expérience déborde sans pouvoir être tenue ; dans l'autre, elle se +trouve neutralisée par des formes trop générales pour en porter la +singularité. La figuration ouvre un espace intermédiaire où ce qui +excède toute résolution peut néanmoins apparaître sous une forme +partageable, sans être ni dissous ni rigidifié. + +Encore faut-il que cette co-présence soit portée par un régime +d'adresse. Car un différend n'existe pas simplement parce qu'il est +exprimé ; il existe parce qu'il est adressé dans une forme qui le rend +recevable sans le normaliser entièrement. Une scène archicrative ne +garantit pas la reconnaissance, mais elle ouvre la possibilité d'une +écoute qui ne soit pas immédiatement capturée par les formats dominants +de validation. Elle ne supprime pas les asymétries ; elle les expose +dans une forme où elles peuvent être disputées. + +Reste une condition plus exigeante encore : une telle scène suppose une +certaine incomplétude. Elle ne peut pas être saturée. Elle ne peut pas +coïncider parfaitement avec son propre sens. Il demeure toujours un +écart entre l'expérience vécue et sa formalisation. Dès qu'une scène +prétend contenir entièrement ce qu'elle met en forme, elle cesse d'être +opératoire ; elle devient message, dispositif de communication ou outil +de légitimation. Pour qu'elle reste vivante, il faut qu'elle laisse +place à ce qui n'est pas encore institué et qui doit pourtant la +traverser. + +Une forme saturée, qui prétend contenir entièrement ce qu'elle expose, +ne laisse plus place à ce qui pourrait la déplacer. Elle devient un +message stabilisé, un dispositif clos, incapable d'accueillir ce qui la +déborde. L'incomplétude, au contraire, maintient une ouverture. Elle +rend possible l'irruption de ce qui n'était pas prévu, de ce qui n'était +pas encore institué. Elle empêche la coïncidence totale entre la forme +et son sens, condition nécessaire pour que la scène reste opératoire. + +Différé, figuration, adresse, incomplétude : ces conditions ne composent +pas un modèle idéal. Elles décrivent le régime minimal à partir duquel +une scène peut commencer à faire tenir un différend. Elles permettent +aussi de comprendre pourquoi certaines configurations, même modestes, +parviennent à instituer quelque chose que des dispositifs beaucoup plus +puissants échouent à produire. + +On en trouve des manifestations dans des contextes très différents, +souvent éloignés des centres institutionnels dominants. Des collectifs +qui travaillent à partir de mémoires fragmentées, de langues minorées, +de récits contradictoires peuvent parfois faire émerger des formes où ce +qui ne trouvait pas place ailleurs devient partageable. Ce qui importe +alors n'est pas seulement le contenu de ce qui est dit, mais la manière +dont cela est tenu : un espace où plusieurs voix peuvent se répondre +sans être immédiatement hiérarchisées, un dispositif où le récit n'est +pas sommé de se conformer à une cohérence préalable, une forme où +l'expérience peut apparaître sans être aussitôt réduite. + +De même, certaines pratiques de réouverture d'archives ou de +reconfiguration de récits historiques ne valent pas seulement comme +gestes de restitution. Elles instituent des scènes où les conditions +mêmes de la visibilité du passé deviennent disputables. L'archive cesse +d'être un dépôt ; elle devient un lieu de conflit. Une telle +transformation n'est possible que si une forme permet de porter ce +conflit au-delà de la simple dénonciation. + +Ces configurations ont en commun de ne pas partir d'un universel déjà +donné. Elles n'appliquent pas un cadre préexistant ; elles produisent +les conditions d'une mise en relation. Elles ne cherchent pas d'abord à +résoudre les différences ; elles travaillent à les rendre traversables. +En ce sens, elles engagent une autre compréhension de l'universalité. + +L'universel n'y apparaît plus comme un principe abstrait auquel il +faudrait se conformer, ni comme une simple addition de singularités. Il +se forme dans l'épreuve même de la comparution. Il n'est pas ce qui +précède la scène ; il est ce qui peut en émerger lorsque des positions +irréductibles parviennent à se tenir ensemble sans se dissoudre. + +Une telle universalité reste nécessairement fragile. Elle ne s'impose +pas. Elle ne se décrète pas. Elle dépend de la capacité des formes à +soutenir cette co-présence. Elle peut échouer, se refermer, se +rigidifier. Mais elle constitue néanmoins l'un des seuls modes possibles +de dépassement des fragmentations contemporaines sans retomber dans +l'imposition d'un cadre unique. + +La question culturelle rejoint alors pleinement la question +civilisationnelle. Ce qui est en jeu n'est plus seulement la capacité à +produire des scènes locales de viabilisation des tensions, mais la +possibilité de leur articulation. Une civilisation ne se définit pas par +l'existence de scènes isolées, aussi riches soient-elles, mais par la +manière dont ces scènes peuvent entrer en relation sans se neutraliser. +Autrement dit, par la capacité à faire tenir une pluralité de formes +sans les réduire à une unité forcée ni les abandonner à la dispersion. + +Or c'est précisément cette articulation qui fait aujourd'hui défaut. Les +scènes existent, parfois avec une grande intensité, mais elles peinent à +se relier. Elles restent situées, fragmentées, difficilement +transmissibles au-delà de leur contexte immédiat. Elles ouvrent des +seuils ; elles ne composent pas encore. + +La question n'est donc pas seulement celle de la production de scènes, +mais celle de leur écologie. Une écologie archicratique des scènes +culturelles ne viserait ni l'unification, ni la standardisation, ni la +simple mise en réseau. Elle supposerait la capacité à maintenir des +différences de régime tout en permettant des passages. Non pas une +traduction totale, mais des formes de médiation qui n'effacent pas les +écarts. Non pas une harmonisation, mais une articulation. + +Une telle exigence transforme profondément la manière de penser la +culture. Elle ne peut plus être envisagée comme un domaine à protéger ou +à développer, mais comme un ensemble de conditions à instituer et à +maintenir. Elle ne relève plus seulement de politiques publiques, aussi +nécessaires soient-elles, mais d'une attention portée aux formes mêmes +dans lesquelles le monde devient partageable. + +La culture cesse alors d'apparaître comme un supplément. Elle devient le +plan sur lequel se joue la possibilité même d'un monde commun — non +pas un monde réconcilié, mais un monde encore habitable dans sa +conflictualité. + +Et c'est en ce sens qu'elle constitue le seuil civilisationnel. + +Il faut ici lever une dernière équivoque. Dire que la culture constitue +un seuil civilisationnel ne revient nullement à l'ériger en refuge noble +face à la brutalité des autres sphères, ni à la traiter comme le luxe +suprême des sociétés apaisées. C'est presque l'inverse qui est vrai. La +culture devient décisive précisément lorsque les autres régimes de +régulation montrent leurs limites. C'est lorsque le droit ne suffit plus +à faire comparaître, lorsque la politique peine à faire tenir la +division, lorsque l'économie organise sans légitimer, lorsque la +technique transforme sans être habitée, lorsque les médias rendent +visible sans rendre transmissible, que la question des formes devient +irréductible. On mesure alors la différence entre une société +fonctionnelle et un monde habitable. Une société fonctionnelle peut +encore calculer, archiver, distribuer, optimiser, conserver et divertir. +Un monde habitable exige davantage : des formes où ce qui blesse, +divise, déborde ou menace peut être porté sans être nié. + +La culture n'est donc pas ici le dernier chapitre par convenance ; elle +est l'épreuve terminale. Non parce qu'elle résoudrait ce que les autres +tensions n'ont pas su résoudre, mais parce qu'elle révèle si un +collectif dispose encore des formes nécessaires pour n'être livré ni à +la pure gestion ni à la pure déflagration. Une civilisation ne se juge +peut-être jamais aussi clairement que dans les formes qu'elle se donne +pour ne pas sombrer tout à fait dans l'insignifiance de ses propres +conflits. + +Une telle distinction permet de mieux saisir ce qui se joue à ce niveau. +Une société peut continuer à fonctionner sans disposer de scènes +capables de porter ses tensions. Elle peut organiser ses flux, maintenir +ses institutions, réguler ses interactions, produire des formes +d'expression multiples. Elle peut même donner l'impression d'une +vitalité culturelle intense. Pourtant, cette activité ne suffit pas à +garantir qu'elle se tienne comme monde. + +Il est possible qu'une société demeure fonctionnelle tout en devenant de +moins en moins habitable symboliquement. Les conflits y persistent, +parfois avec une intensité accrue, mais ils ne trouvent plus les formes +dans lesquelles ils pourraient être partagés sans se transformer en +fragmentation. Les expériences se multiplient, mais elles ne composent +pas. Les discours circulent, mais ils ne se rencontrent pas. Ce qui se +défait alors n'est pas l'activité sociale elle-même, mais la possibilité +de l'éprouver comme monde commun. + +Une telle situation ne se traduit pas nécessairement par un effondrement +visible. Elle peut coexister avec une grande efficacité +organisationnelle, une forte productivité, une richesse d'initiatives +culturelles. Mais elle introduit une fragilité plus profonde : celle +d'un collectif qui ne parvient plus à donner forme à ce qui le traverse. +Il peut encore durer, fonctionner, s'adapter ; il lui devient plus +difficile de se reconnaître, de se représenter, de se reprendre. + +C'est à ce point que la question culturelle prend toute sa portée. Elle +ne désigne pas un supplément ou un raffinement, mais la condition sous +laquelle une société peut encore se soutenir comme monde. Là où cette +condition vacille, ce n'est pas seulement un domaine qui s'affaiblit ; +c'est la capacité même d'habiter les tensions qui se trouve compromise. + +Il devient alors possible de reprendre l'ensemble du chapitre dans une +seule ligne de force. Les tensions économiques, écologiques, sociales, +politiques, psychiques, médiatiques, techniques, géopolitiques et +cosmopolitiques ne désignaient pas des domaines séparés, mais des +variations d'un même problème : celui de la possibilité de faire tenir +un monde traversé par des forces hétérogènes, irréductibles, souvent +contradictoires. À chaque niveau apparaissait la même exigence : non +supprimer les tensions, ni les équilibrer abstraitement, mais instituer +des formes où elles puissent être exposées, différées, disputées sans se +transformer immédiatement en destruction. Aucune de ces tensions ne +devient habitable par elle-même. + +Une économie peut redistribuer sans apaiser. Une écologie peut préserver +sans faire monde. Une politique peut décider sans être reconnue. Une +technique peut fonctionner sans être habitée. Une mémoire peut conserver +sans être reprise. Un droit peut qualifier sans faire comparaître. Une +scène cosmopolitique peut s'ouvrir sans être tenue. Dans tous les cas, +ce qui manque, lorsque cela manque, n'est pas d'abord une règle, une +institution ou un savoir. C'est une forme. + +Non pas une forme décorative, mais une forme capable de porter ce qui +excède toute résolution immédiate ; une forme où le conflit peut +apparaître sans être absorbé dans la gestion, la polarisation ou la +disparition. C'est précisément cette fonction que la culture, entendue +en son sens archicratique, rend possible. Elle n'ajoute pas un +supplément au monde ; elle lui donne encore la possibilité d'apparaître +comme monde, certes disputé, mais viable. C'est pourquoi elle constitue +ici le seuil civilisationnel décisif. Une société peut continuer à +produire, administrer, optimiser, sécuriser, patrimonialiser ; si elle +perd la capacité d'instituer des formes où ce qui la traverse peut être +tenu, elle cesse progressivement de se soutenir comme monde. + +Une civilisation ne tient pas en éliminant le tragique.\ Elle tient en lui donnant forme. -Et cette forme, aujourd’hui, ne peut plus être simplement héritée. Elle doit être réinstituée — sans garantie, sans modèle, mais avec cette exigence irréductible : que le monde puisse encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde exposé au différend, et par là même habitable. +Et cette forme, aujourd'hui, ne peut plus être simplement héritée. Elle +doit être réinstituée — sans garantie, sans modèle, mais avec cette +exigence irréductible : que le monde puisse encore apparaître à lui-même +comme monde exposé au différend, et par là même habitable. ## *Conclusion générale du chapitre 5 — Synthèse des tensions, des co-viabilités et des régulations archicratiques* -Il ne s’agit plus désormais de reprendre les tensions une à une, ni d’en reconduire l’énumération sous une forme condensée. Ce qui se dégage à l’issue de cette traversée n’est pas un simple bilan, mais une loi de composition. Car ce que ce chapitre a rendu lisible, de l’économie à la culture, ne relève pas d’une pluralité de crises hétérogènes, mais d’un même défaut de tenue : celui des formes par lesquelles un monde peut encore faire apparaître, soutenir et transformer ce qui le traverse. +Il ne s'agit plus désormais de reprendre les tensions une à une, ni d'en +reconduire l'énumération sous une forme condensée. Ce qui se dégage à +l'issue de cette traversée n'est pas un simple bilan, mais une loi de +composition. Car ce que ce chapitre a rendu lisible, de l'économie à la +culture, ne relève pas d'une pluralité de crises hétérogènes, mais d'un +même défaut de tenue : celui des formes par lesquelles un monde peut +encore faire apparaître, soutenir et transformer ce qui le traverse. -Ce qui se révèle alors n’est pas une crise des tensions elles-mêmes. Les tensions ne manquent pas ; elles prolifèrent, se déplacent, s’intensifient. Ce qui fait défaut, c’est la capacité à les porter. Autrement dit : non la conflictualité, mais les scènes. Non l’existence du dissensus, mais les formes de sa tenue. +Ce qui se révèle alors n'est pas une crise des tensions elles-mêmes. Les +tensions ne manquent pas ; elles prolifèrent, se déplacent, +s'intensifient. Ce qui fait défaut, c'est la capacité à les porter. +Autrement dit : non la conflictualité, mais les scènes. Non l'existence +du dissensus, mais les formes de sa tenue. -La crise contemporaine ne se réduit donc pas à une accumulation de déséquilibres. Elle doit être pensée comme une crise de scène : non disparition des conflits, mais fragilisation des formes de co-présence sans lesquelles un monde commun — fût-il conflictuel — cesse d’être viable. +La crise contemporaine ne se réduit donc pas à une accumulation de +déséquilibres. Elle doit être pensée comme une crise de scène : non +disparition des conflits, mais fragilisation des formes de co-présence +sans lesquelles un monde commun — fût-il conflictuel — cesse d'être +viable. -Une telle situation ne correspond ni à une disparition du politique, ni à son triomphe sous une forme nouvelle. Elle correspond à son déplacement hors de ses conditions de visibilité et de tenue. Le conflit demeure, mais il est redistribué dans des régimes où il ne peut plus être soutenu comme tel. Il est absorbé dans la gestion, accéléré dans la réaction, dissous dans la saturation expressive, ou capté dans des dispositifs qui en neutralisent la portée. Ce qui s’efface alors, ce n’est pas la conflictualité, mais sa capacité à devenir forme. +Une telle situation ne correspond ni à une disparition du politique, ni +à son triomphe sous une forme nouvelle. Elle correspond à son +déplacement hors de ses conditions de visibilité et de tenue. Le conflit +demeure, mais il est redistribué dans des régimes où il ne peut plus +être soutenu comme tel. Il est absorbé dans la gestion, accéléré dans la +réaction, dissous dans la saturation expressive, ou capté dans des +dispositifs qui en neutralisent la portée. Ce qui s'efface alors, ce +n'est pas la conflictualité, mais sa capacité à devenir forme. -C’est à ce point précis que le concept d’archicration prend sa portée la plus décisive. Il ne désigne pas un niveau supplémentaire d’intervention, ni un principe abstrait d’arbitrage. Il nomme la condition minimale à partir de laquelle un monde conflictuel peut encore se soutenir sans imploser : l’institution de scènes où les tensions irréductibles peuvent apparaître, être exposées, différées, disputées et reprises sans être ni annulées ni livrées à leur seule dynamique destructrice. +C'est à ce point précis que le concept d'archicration prend sa portée la +plus décisive. Il ne désigne pas un niveau supplémentaire +d'intervention, ni un principe abstrait d'arbitrage. Il nomme la +condition minimale à partir de laquelle un monde conflictuel peut encore +se soutenir sans imploser : l'institution de scènes où les tensions +irréductibles peuvent apparaître, être exposées, différées, disputées et +reprises sans être ni annulées ni livrées à leur seule dynamique +destructrice. -L’archicration ne vient donc pas résoudre les tensions. Elle les rend habitables. +L'archicration ne vient donc pas résoudre les tensions. Elle les rend +habitables. -À partir de là, la traversée du chapitre permet de dégager non plus des domaines, mais une logique de composition. Ce qui apparaît, à travers la diversité des scènes, est une désarticulation croissante entre trois dimensions pourtant indissociables : les formes, les intensités et les scènes. +À partir de là, la traversée du chapitre permet de dégager non plus des +domaines, mais une logique de composition. Ce qui apparaît, à travers la +diversité des scènes, est une désarticulation croissante entre trois +dimensions pourtant indissociables : les formes, les intensités et les +scènes. -Les formes subsistent souvent, parfois avec une grande stabilité, mais sans être traversées par une conflictualité vivante. Les intensités, à l’inverse, prolifèrent, circulent, affectent, mais sans médiation suffisante pour être reprises. Quant aux scènes, elles existent encore, mais sous des régimes qui empêchent que ce qui s’y exprime puisse réellement transformer les conditions de sa propre apparition. +Les formes subsistent souvent, parfois avec une grande stabilité, mais +sans être traversées par une conflictualité vivante. Les intensités, à +l'inverse, prolifèrent, circulent, affectent, mais sans médiation +suffisante pour être reprises. Quant aux scènes, elles existent encore, +mais sous des régimes qui empêchent que ce qui s'y exprime puisse +réellement transformer les conditions de sa propre apparition. -De cette désarticulation procède ce que l’on peut désormais nommer avec précision : la désarchicration. Non pas l’absence de régulation, mais sa déformation. Non pas la disparition des scènes, mais leur affaiblissement, leur capture ou leur simulation. +De cette désarticulation procède ce que l'on peut désormais nommer avec +précision : la désarchicration. Non pas l'absence de régulation, mais sa +déformation. Non pas la disparition des scènes, mais leur +affaiblissement, leur capture ou leur simulation. -Cette désarchicration ne constitue pas un état homogène. Elle se manifeste selon des régimes distincts, que l’analyse permet de clarifier. Tantôt les formes demeurent, mais ne rouvrent plus ce qu’elles transmettent : la mémoire subsiste, l’exposition demeure, la continuité se maintient, et pourtant la conflictualité vivante s’éteint. Tantôt l’intensité prolifère sans médiation : les affects circulent, les signes s’accumulent, l’expérience s’exalte, mais rien ne se dépose dans une forme reprise. Tantôt enfin la scène elle-même devient dispositif de neutralisation : le dissensus y est accueilli, mis en visibilité, parfois même valorisé, sans pouvoir altérer ce qui l’accueille. +Cette désarchicration ne constitue pas un état homogène. Elle se +manifeste selon des régimes distincts, que l'analyse permet de +clarifier. Tantôt les formes demeurent, mais ne rouvrent plus ce +qu'elles transmettent : la mémoire subsiste, l'exposition demeure, la +continuité se maintient, et pourtant la conflictualité vivante s'éteint. +Tantôt l'intensité prolifère sans médiation : les affects circulent, les +signes s'accumulent, l'expérience s'exalte, mais rien ne se dépose dans +une forme reprise. Tantôt enfin la scène elle-même devient dispositif de +neutralisation : le dissensus y est accueilli, mis en visibilité, +parfois même valorisé, sans pouvoir altérer ce qui l'accueille. -Ces trois régimes ne décrivent pas des anomalies locales. Ils constituent les modalités contemporaines d’un même processus : la perte de capacité à faire tenir ensemble formes, intensités et scènes dans une configuration opératoire. +Ces trois régimes ne décrivent pas des anomalies locales. Ils +constituent les modalités contemporaines d'un même processus : la perte +de capacité à faire tenir ensemble formes, intensités et scènes dans une +configuration opératoire. -Pour comprendre ce qui se défait — et ce qui peut encore tenir — il devient alors nécessaire de déplacer l’analyse vers un niveau plus fondamental. Ce que ce chapitre met en évidence peut être reconduit à trois épreuves constitutives de toute scène archicrative. +Pour comprendre ce qui se défait — et ce qui peut encore tenir — il +devient alors nécessaire de déplacer l'analyse vers un niveau plus +fondamental. Ce que ce chapitre met en évidence peut être reconduit à +trois épreuves constitutives de toute scène archicrative. -Si l’on ramène cette traversée à ce qu’elle a continûment éprouvé, trois épreuves apparaissent. +Si l'on ramène cette traversée à ce qu'elle a continûment éprouvé, trois +épreuves apparaissent. -D’abord, une *épreuve d’apparition* : une tension devient décisive lorsqu’elle engage la possibilité même, pour un être, un collectif, une expérience ou un milieu, d’apparaître autrement que comme donnée, problème ou résidu. Là où l’apparition est empêchée ou inégalement distribuée, la co-viabilité est déjà compromise. +D'abord, une *épreuve d'apparition* : une tension devient décisive +lorsqu'elle engage la possibilité même, pour un être, un collectif, une +expérience ou un milieu, d'apparaître autrement que comme donnée, +problème ou résidu. Là où l'apparition est empêchée ou inégalement +distribuée, la co-viabilité est déjà compromise. -Ensuite, une *épreuve de contestation* : une scène n’existe effectivement que si le dissensus peut y prendre forme sans être aussitôt absorbé, disqualifié ou neutralisé. Là où la contestation n’a plus de seuil légitime, la régulation se dégrade en gestion ou en violence. +Ensuite, une *épreuve de contestation* : une scène n'existe +effectivement que si le dissensus peut y prendre forme sans être +aussitôt absorbé, disqualifié ou neutralisé. Là où la contestation n'a +plus de seuil légitime, la régulation se dégrade en gestion ou en +violence. -Enfin, une *épreuve de révision* : aucun ordre ne peut tenir s’il n’est pas susceptible d’être repris ; mais aucune scène ne tient non plus si tout y devient immédiatement révisable, sans forme ni mémoire. L’archicration se situe précisément dans cet entre-deux, là où un monde est assez structuré pour tenir et assez ouvert pour être transformé par ce qui l’affecte. +Enfin, une *épreuve de révision* : aucun ordre ne peut tenir s'il n'est +pas susceptible d'être repris ; mais aucune scène ne tient non plus si +tout y devient immédiatement révisable, sans forme ni mémoire. +L'archicration se situe précisément dans cet entre-deux, là où un monde +est assez structuré pour tenir et assez ouvert pour être transformé par +ce qui l'affecte. -Ces trois épreuves — *apparaître, contester, réviser* — ne constituent pas des principes abstraits. Elles décrivent le régime minimal à partir duquel une scène peut commencer à faire monde. +Ces trois épreuves — *apparaître, contester, réviser* — ne +constituent pas des principes abstraits. Elles décrivent le régime +minimal à partir duquel une scène peut commencer à faire monde. -C’est à partir d’elles qu’il devient possible de distinguer les états fondamentaux du régime archicratique. +C'est à partir d'elles qu'il devient possible de distinguer les états +fondamentaux du régime archicratique. -Une archicration est active lorsque l’apparition, la contestation et la révision peuvent être conjointement soutenues. Elle est empêchée lorsque ces fonctions subsistent, mais sous des formes trop faibles, trop fragmentées ou trop désajustées pour opérer pleinement. Elle est captée lorsque la scène existe en apparence, mais pour neutraliser ce qu’elle prétend accueillir : pluralité sans dissensus, participation sans effet, visibilité sans reprise. +Une archicration est active lorsque l'apparition, la contestation et la +révision peuvent être conjointement soutenues. Elle est empêchée lorsque +ces fonctions subsistent, mais sous des formes trop faibles, trop +fragmentées ou trop désajustées pour opérer pleinement. Elle est captée +lorsque la scène existe en apparence, mais pour neutraliser ce qu'elle +prétend accueillir : pluralité sans dissensus, participation sans effet, +visibilité sans reprise. -Ces distinctions ne relèvent pas d’une typologie extérieure. Elles permettent de lire, à travers les configurations les plus diverses, le degré de tenue d’un monde. +Ces distinctions ne relèvent pas d'une typologie extérieure. Elles +permettent de lire, à travers les configurations les plus diverses, le +degré de tenue d'un monde. -Alors seulement apparaît l’enjeu du chapitre dans toute son ampleur. +Alors seulement apparaît l'enjeu du chapitre dans toute son ampleur. -La question n’est pas de savoir comment supprimer les tensions. Elle n’est pas davantage de les équilibrer, de les optimiser ou de les rendre compatibles. Elle est de savoir dans quelles formes elles peuvent être tenues sans être trahies. +La question n'est pas de savoir comment supprimer les tensions. Elle +n'est pas davantage de les équilibrer, de les optimiser ou de les rendre +compatibles. Elle est de savoir dans quelles formes elles peuvent être +tenues sans être trahies. -Car une société peut continuer à fonctionner sans disposer de telles formes. Elle peut organiser ses flux, maintenir ses institutions, produire des normes, multiplier les expressions, intensifier ses régulations. Elle peut même donner l’impression d’une vitalité continue. Mais si elle ne parvient plus à instituer des scènes où ce qui la traverse peut être exposé, disputé et repris, elle cesse progressivement de se soutenir comme monde. +Car une société peut continuer à fonctionner sans disposer de telles +formes. Elle peut organiser ses flux, maintenir ses institutions, +produire des normes, multiplier les expressions, intensifier ses +régulations. Elle peut même donner l'impression d'une vitalité continue. +Mais si elle ne parvient plus à instituer des scènes où ce qui la +traverse peut être exposé, disputé et repris, elle cesse progressivement +de se soutenir comme monde. -Ce qui se joue ici excède toute distinction sectorielle. Il ne s’agit plus de l’économie, de l’écologie, du social, du politique ou de la culture pris isolément. Il s’agit de la capacité d’un collectif à se donner des formes où ce qui le divise ne conduit ni à la pure gestion ni à la pure déflagration. +Ce qui se joue ici excède toute distinction sectorielle. Il ne s'agit +plus de l'économie, de l'écologie, du social, du politique ou de la +culture pris isolément. Il s'agit de la capacité d'un collectif à se +donner des formes où ce qui le divise ne conduit ni à la pure gestion ni +à la pure déflagration. -C’est en ce sens que le chapitre 5 opère un déplacement décisif dans l’économie de l’essai. Il montre que les grandes tensions contemporaines ne désignent pas seulement des crises à résoudre, mais des épreuves de scène. Il montre que la question de la régulation ne peut plus être posée en termes de dispositifs seuls, mais en termes de formes. Il montre enfin que la co-viabilité n’est pas un état à atteindre, mais une opération à instituer. +C'est en ce sens que le chapitre 5 opère un déplacement décisif dans +l'économie de l'essai. Il montre que les grandes tensions contemporaines +ne désignent pas seulement des crises à résoudre, mais des épreuves de +scène. Il montre que la question de la régulation ne peut plus être +posée en termes de dispositifs seuls, mais en termes de formes. Il +montre enfin que la co-viabilité n'est pas un état à atteindre, mais une +opération à instituer. -L’archicratie apparaît alors pour ce qu’elle est : ni doctrine de l’ordre, ni apologie du désordre, ni idéal de conciliation, mais pensée des formes par lesquelles un monde conflictuel peut encore tenir sans se nier lui-même. +L'archicratie apparaît alors pour ce qu'elle est : ni doctrine de +l'ordre, ni apologie du désordre, ni idéal de conciliation, mais pensée +des formes par lesquelles un monde conflictuel peut encore tenir sans se +nier lui-même. -Elle ne promet ni réconciliation, ni stabilisation définitive. Elle n’offre aucun modèle à appliquer. Elle ne garantit aucun résultat. Elle désigne une exigence minimale et irréductible : que le monde puisse encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde traversé, exposé, contesté — et, par là même, habitable. +Elle ne promet ni réconciliation, ni stabilisation définitive. Elle +n'offre aucun modèle à appliquer. Elle ne garantit aucun résultat. Elle +désigne une exigence minimale et irréductible : que le monde puisse +encore apparaître à lui-même comme monde traversé, exposé, contesté — et, par là même, habitable. -Dans un temps saturé de gestion, d’accélération, d’automatisation et de simulation participative, cette exigence ne va pas de soi. Elle suppose un travail : celui de réinstituer des seuils, de rouvrir des formes, de maintenir des écarts, de soutenir des différés. Elle suppose de renoncer à l’illusion d’une régulation sans conflit, comme à celle d’un conflit sans forme. +Dans un temps saturé de gestion, d'accélération, d'automatisation et de +simulation participative, cette exigence ne va pas de soi. Elle suppose +un travail : celui de réinstituer des seuils, de rouvrir des formes, de +maintenir des écarts, de soutenir des différés. Elle suppose de renoncer +à l'illusion d'une régulation sans conflit, comme à celle d'un conflit +sans forme. -Elle suppose de réinstituer les conditions mêmes dans lesquelles une scène peut tenir. +Elle suppose de réinstituer les conditions mêmes dans lesquelles une +scène peut tenir. Telle est la leçon la plus rigoureuse de ce chapitre. -Les tensions contemporaines ne rendent pas le monde ingouvernable. Elles révèlent seulement que ses scènes sont devenues insuffisantes. Le travail à venir ne consistera donc pas à produire une harmonie factice, mais à rouvrir des formes où les conflits puissent être tenus sans être niés, différés sans être neutralisés, disputés sans détruire d’emblée ce qui les porte. C’est à cette condition seulement qu’un monde instituable redevient pensable. +Les tensions contemporaines ne rendent pas le monde ingouvernable. Elles +révèlent seulement que ses scènes sont devenues insuffisantes. Le +travail à venir ne consistera donc pas à produire une harmonie factice, +mais à rouvrir des formes où les conflits puissent être tenus sans être +niés, différés sans être neutralisés, disputés sans détruire d'emblée ce +qui les porte. C'est à cette condition seulement qu'un monde instituable +redevient pensable. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/conclusion.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/conclusion.mdx index 721a133..1ffa3c6 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/conclusion.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/conclusion.mdx @@ -1,77 +1,417 @@ --- -title: "Conclusion — ArchiCraT-IA" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Conclusion — ArchiCraT-IA +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 70 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Conclusion-Archicrat-IA-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Conclusion-Archicrat-IA-version_officielle.docx --- -Nous n’assistons ni à un retour primordial du désordre ni à une raréfaction du pouvoir. Ce qui se transforme, plus discrètement mais de manière décisive, ce sont les conditions mêmes sous lesquelles la régulation peut apparaître. Ce qui se reconfigure sous nos yeux n’est pas d’abord la quantité de pouvoir à l’œuvre dans nos sociétés, mais la manière dont ce pouvoir se rend — ou ne se rend plus — visible, adressable, contestable. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas ; elle change de régime d’existence. Là où elle trouvait autrefois à se formuler dans des lieux identifiables, à se différer dans des temporalités instituées, à se confronter dans des espaces d’énonciation reconnus, elle se trouve de plus en plus distribuée dans des chaînes opératoires qui se présentent comme de simples enchaînements techniques. Flux, scores, interfaces, barèmes, protocoles : autant de formes qui n’abolissent pas les décisions, mais en modifient profondément les conditions d’apparition. Ce qui relevait d’une épreuve devient traitement. Ce qui relevait d’une adresse devient calcul. Ce qui relevait d’une justification devient paramétrage. -Ce déplacement est d’autant plus difficile à saisir qu’il ne se donne pas comme rupture. Il s’installe dans la continuité apparente des dispositifs, dans l’amélioration de leur efficacité, dans la promesse d’une gestion plus rapide, plus fluide, plus objective des situations. Le conflit y est désamorcé au nom de la performance. Le différé y est perçu comme ralentissement. L’exposition y est remplacée par une visibilité sans interlocution, où tout semble disponible sans que rien ne soit véritablement tenu. Il ne s’agit pas d’un vide. Il ne s’agit pas d’un monde sans normes ni d’un effondrement du pouvoir. Il s’agit d’un recouvrement. Ce que cet essai-thèse a nommé oblitération archicratique désigne cette dynamique précise : la substitution progressive de la scène par l’exécution, du différé par l’automaticité, de l’énonciation par la trace, de l’épreuve par la donnée. +Nous n'assistons ni à un retour primordial du désordre ni à une +raréfaction du pouvoir. Ce qui se transforme, plus discrètement mais de +manière décisive, ce sont les conditions mêmes sous lesquelles la +régulation peut apparaître. Ce qui se reconfigure sous nos yeux n'est +pas d'abord la quantité de pouvoir à l'œuvre dans nos sociétés, mais la +manière dont ce pouvoir se rend — ou ne se rend plus — visible, +adressable, contestable. La conflictualité ne disparaît pas ; elle +change de régime d'existence. Là où elle trouvait autrefois à se +formuler dans des lieux identifiables, à se différer dans des +temporalités instituées, à se confronter dans des espaces d'énonciation +reconnus, elle se trouve de plus en plus distribuée dans des chaînes +opératoires qui se présentent comme de simples enchaînements techniques. +Flux, scores, interfaces, barèmes, protocoles : autant de formes qui +n'abolissent pas les décisions, mais en modifient profondément les +conditions d'apparition. Ce qui relevait d'une épreuve devient +traitement. Ce qui relevait d'une adresse devient calcul. Ce qui +relevait d'une justification devient paramétrage. -Le pouvoir ne cesse pas d’opérer ; il cesse de comparaître. Les décisions continuent d’être prises ; elles cessent d’être tenues. Elles ne disparaissent pas ; elles se soustraient aux formes où elles pourraient être rapportées à leurs fondements, confrontées à leurs effets, reprises à partir de ce qu’elles affectent. +Ce déplacement est d'autant plus difficile à saisir qu'il ne se donne +pas comme rupture. Il s'installe dans la continuité apparente des +dispositifs, dans l'amélioration de leur efficacité, dans la promesse +d'une gestion plus rapide, plus fluide, plus objective des situations. +Le conflit y est désamorcé au nom de la performance. Le différé y est +perçu comme ralentissement. L'exposition y est remplacée par une +visibilité sans interlocution, où tout semble disponible sans que rien +ne soit véritablement tenu. Il ne s'agit pas d'un vide. Il ne s'agit pas +d'un monde sans normes ni d'un effondrement du pouvoir. Il s'agit d'un +recouvrement. Ce que cet essai-thèse a nommé oblitération archicratique +désigne cette dynamique précise : la substitution progressive de la +scène par l'exécution, du différé par l'automaticité, de l'énonciation +par la trace, de l'épreuve par la donnée. -Ce qui caractérise ainsi notre situation n’est pas une crise de la conflictualité, mais une crise de sa tenue. Non l’absence de dissensus, mais l’altération des formes capables de le porter. Non la disparition du politique, mais sa désarticulation progressive hors des scènes où il pouvait encore apparaître comme tel. À ce niveau, ce que nous appelons crise ne relève plus d’un dysfonctionnement partiel, ni d’une dérive simplement sectorielle. Elle engage les conditions même dans lesquelles un monde peut encore faire apparaître, soutenir et transformer ce qui le traverse. +Le pouvoir ne cesse pas d'opérer ; il cesse de comparaître. Les +décisions continuent d'être prises ; elles cessent d'être tenues. Elles +ne disparaissent pas ; elles se soustraient aux formes où elles +pourraient être rapportées à leurs fondements, confrontées à leurs +effets, reprises à partir de ce qu'elles affectent. -Ce déplacement du regard a commandé tout le parcours accompli. Il a d’abord fallu apprendre à voir. Distinguer ce qui fonde de ce qui opère, ce qui opère de ce qui met à l’épreuve. Rompre avec les confusions qui font passer l’exécution pour la justification, la visibilité pour l’opposabilité, la procédure pour la scène. Sans cette discipline de détectabilité, le présent demeure illisible et la critique se dissout dans des généralités. L’une des ambitions premières de ce travail aura donc été de donner des prises : non pas inventer un vocabulaire pour le plaisir de l’invention, mais rendre discernable ce que les descriptions ordinaires du pouvoir, de la gouvernance et de l’administration laissent trop souvent se confondre. +Ce qui caractérise ainsi notre situation n'est pas une crise de la +conflictualité, mais une crise de sa tenue. Non l'absence de dissensus, +mais l'altération des formes capables de le porter. Non la disparition +du politique, mais sa désarticulation progressive hors des scènes où il +pouvait encore apparaître comme tel. À ce niveau, ce que nous appelons +crise ne relève plus d'un dysfonctionnement partiel, ni d'une dérive +simplement sectorielle. Elle engage les conditions même dans lesquelles +un monde peut encore faire apparaître, soutenir et transformer ce qui le +traverse. -Encore fallait-il que ce vocabulaire n’usurpe pas sa propre nécessité. L’archicratie ne vaut pas parce qu’elle pourrait tout redire dans sa langue ; elle vaut seulement là où elle permet de discerner quelque chose qui, sans elle, resterait confondu, euphémisé ou inaperçu. Elle ne constitue donc ni une théorie totale du politique, ni une clef universelle des mondes historiques, mais un instrument critique situé, tenu à une obligation de retenue : se taire là où il n’apporte aucun gain de lisibilité, et répondre de ses distinctions là où il prétend en produire. C’est à cette condition seulement qu’un paradigme cesse d’être un idiome de surplomb pour devenir une épreuve réelle de connaissance. +Ce déplacement du regard a commandé tout le parcours accompli. Il a +d'abord fallu apprendre à voir. Distinguer ce qui fonde de ce qui opère, +ce qui opère de ce qui met à l'épreuve. Rompre avec les confusions qui +font passer l'exécution pour la justification, la visibilité pour +l'opposabilité, la procédure pour la scène. Sans cette discipline de +détectabilité, le présent demeure illisible et la critique se dissout +dans des généralités. L'une des ambitions premières de ce travail aura +donc été de donner des prises : non pas inventer un vocabulaire pour le +plaisir de l'invention, mais rendre discernable ce que les descriptions +ordinaires du pouvoir, de la gouvernance et de l'administration laissent +trop souvent se confondre. -Il a fallu ensuite remonter plus loin. Reconnaître que les formes d’épreuve ne sont ni des raffinements tardifs des modernités représentatives, ni des suppléments ajoutés à des ordres déjà constitués, mais des conditions plus profondes de la tenue des mondes humains. Avant les États, avant les bureaucraties, avant les codifications juridiques stabilisées, des collectifs ont dû inventer des manières de différer, de ritualiser, d’exposer ce qui les traversait. L’histoire du politique ne commence pas avec la souveraineté constituée ; elle commence avec la nécessité, pour un monde traversé de forces hétérogènes, de ne pas s’abandonner à leur pure immédiateté. Elle commence là où quelque chose comme une reprise devient possible, là où ce qui affecte peut être reconduit à une forme d’exposition, si rudimentaire, violente ou dissymétrique soit-elle. La scène n’est donc pas un luxe moderne. Elle appartient à la structure même des mondes qui tiennent. +Encore fallait-il que ce vocabulaire n'usurpe pas sa propre nécessité. +L'archicratie ne vaut pas parce qu'elle pourrait tout redire dans sa +langue ; elle vaut seulement là où elle permet de discerner quelque +chose qui, sans elle, resterait confondu, euphémisé ou inaperçu. Elle ne +constitue donc ni une théorie totale du politique, ni une clef +universelle des mondes historiques, mais un instrument critique situé, +tenu à une obligation de retenue : se taire là où il n'apporte aucun +gain de lisibilité, et répondre de ses distinctions là où il prétend en +produire. C'est à cette condition seulement qu'un paradigme cesse d'être +un idiome de surplomb pour devenir une épreuve réelle de connaissance. -Il a fallu également traverser les grandes pensées du pouvoir, non pour les annuler, ni pour les annexer de force à un nouveau système, mais pour en mesurer les prises et les limites. Certaines ont privilégié le fondement, d’autres l’opération, d’autres encore la conflictualité, la dispersion des dispositifs, l’individuation, la justification ou le dissensus. Toutes ont saisi quelque chose de réel ; aucune n’a tenu entièrement ensemble les conditions d’une régulation habitable. Ce que cette traversée a rendu possible, ce n’est pas une synthèse des doctrines, mais une méta-grammaire du politique, capable de les relire à partir de ce qu’elles permettent — ou non — de penser : comment un ordre se fonde, comment il opère, comment il accepte d’être mis à l’épreuve. +Il a fallu ensuite remonter plus loin. Reconnaître que les formes +d'épreuve ne sont ni des raffinements tardifs des modernités +représentatives, ni des suppléments ajoutés à des ordres déjà +constitués, mais des conditions plus profondes de la tenue des mondes +humains. Avant les États, avant les bureaucraties, avant les +codifications juridiques stabilisées, des collectifs ont dû inventer des +manières de différer, de ritualiser, d'exposer ce qui les traversait. +L'histoire du politique ne commence pas avec la souveraineté constituée +; elle commence avec la nécessité, pour un monde traversé de forces +hétérogènes, de ne pas s'abandonner à leur pure immédiateté. Elle +commence là où quelque chose comme une reprise devient possible, là où +ce qui affecte peut être reconduit à une forme d'exposition, si +rudimentaire, violente ou dissymétrique soit-elle. La scène n'est donc +pas un luxe moderne. Elle appartient à la structure même des mondes qui +tiennent. -Il a fallu enfin éprouver cette grammaire dans l’histoire effective des transformations modernes, là où les capacités de régulation ont atteint une intensité inédite. Ce qui apparaît alors n’est pas seulement une succession d’innovations techniques, mais une série de reconfigurations du rapport entre fondement, opération et épreuve. Chaque révolution industrielle a redessiné ce triangle ; chacune a accru certaines puissances tout en décalant, fragmentant ou fragilisant les formes capables de les soutenir. L’histoire moderne n’apparaît plus comme celle d’un progrès simplement technique ; elle devient lisible comme celle des déplacements successifs du lieu où le pouvoir se rend — ou cesse de se rendre — comparable, contestable, révisable. +Il a fallu également traverser les grandes pensées du pouvoir, non pour +les annuler, ni pour les annexer de force à un nouveau système, mais +pour en mesurer les prises et les limites. Certaines ont privilégié le +fondement, d'autres l'opération, d'autres encore la conflictualité, la +dispersion des dispositifs, l'individuation, la justification ou le +dissensus. Toutes ont saisi quelque chose de réel ; aucune n'a tenu +entièrement ensemble les conditions d'une régulation habitable. Ce que +cette traversée a rendu possible, ce n'est pas une synthèse des +doctrines, mais une méta-grammaire du politique, capable de les relire à +partir de ce qu'elles permettent — ou non — de penser : comment un +ordre se fonde, comment il opère, comment il accepte d'être mis à +l'épreuve. -C’est au point le plus brûlant du présent que cette exigence se révèle avec la plus grande netteté. Les tensions contemporaines ne se laissent pas comprendre comme des crises séparées, ni comme des anomalies sectorielles. Elles manifestent, chacune à leur manière, la difficulté croissante à instituer des formes dans lesquelles ce qui est affecté par les décisions peut être reconduit à une épreuve. Ce qui manque n’est pas la capacité à produire des normes, des infrastructures, des critères, des instruments. Ce qui manque, de plus en plus, c’est l’habileté à les porter. De là la nécessité d’un déplacement conceptuel décisif : substituer au lexique lisse de la durabilité la notion de co-viabilité. Non pas un équilibre supposé entre intérêts déjà constitués, ni la correction technocratique d’externalités, mais l’institution toujours fragile, toujours révisable, toujours conflictuelle, des conditions sous lesquelles des formes de vie hétérogènes peuvent encore tenir ensemble sans destruction irréversible. +Il a fallu enfin éprouver cette grammaire dans l'histoire effective des +transformations modernes, là où les capacités de régulation ont atteint +une intensité inédite. Ce qui apparaît alors n'est pas seulement une +succession d'innovations techniques, mais une série de reconfigurations +du rapport entre fondement, opération et épreuve. Chaque révolution +industrielle a redessiné ce triangle ; chacune a accru certaines +puissances tout en décalant, fragmentant ou fragilisant les formes +capables de les soutenir. L'histoire moderne n'apparaît plus comme celle +d'un progrès simplement technique ; elle devient lisible comme celle des +déplacements successifs du lieu où le pouvoir se rend — ou cesse de se +rendre — comparable, contestable, révisable. -Ce qui se dégage ainsi de l’ensemble n’est pas une doctrine supplémentaire, encore moins un système clos. C’est une condition — qui ne garantit ni harmonie ni salut, mais sans laquelle aucune régulation ne peut être tenue comme monde. Cette condition peut désormais être formulée simplement : une régulation ne devient habitable qu’à la mesure où ce qui la fonde, ce qui l’opère et ce qui la met à l’épreuve demeurent distinguables, articulés et exposables. Toute la difficulté tient alors à ceci : maintenir cette distinction sans les dissocier, et cette articulation sans les confondre. Là où ces dimensions se confondent, se disjoignent ou se dérobent à l’exposition, la régulation peut continuer à fonctionner ; elle cesse de se tenir. +C'est au point le plus brûlant du présent que cette exigence se révèle +avec la plus grande netteté. Les tensions contemporaines ne se laissent +pas comprendre comme des crises séparées, ni comme des anomalies +sectorielles. Elles manifestent, chacune à leur manière, la difficulté +croissante à instituer des formes dans lesquelles ce qui est affecté par +les décisions peut être reconduit à une épreuve. Ce qui manque n'est pas +la capacité à produire des normes, des infrastructures, des critères, +des instruments. Ce qui manque, de plus en plus, c'est l'habileté à les +porter. De là la nécessité d'un déplacement conceptuel décisif : +substituer au lexique lisse de la durabilité la notion de co-viabilité. +Non pas un équilibre supposé entre intérêts déjà constitués, ni la +correction technocratique d'externalités, mais l'institution toujours +fragile, toujours révisable, toujours conflictuelle, des conditions sous +lesquelles des formes de vie hétérogènes peuvent encore tenir ensemble +sans destruction irréversible. -C’est cette condition minimale que nous avons nommée archicratie. Ni régime parmi d’autres, ni forme institutionnelle déterminée, ni idéal moral à incarner : un seuil. Le seuil au-dessous duquel la régulation se réduit à sa propre opérativité, et au-dessus duquel elle devient, au moins en droit, habitable, parce qu’elle laisse ouverte la possibilité de sa reprise. L’archicratie ne désigne ni la justice, ni la bonté, ni la douceur des décisions ; elle désigne la condition sans laquelle ces questions elles-mêmes cessent de pouvoir être posées politiquement. +Ce qui se dégage ainsi de l'ensemble n'est pas une doctrine +supplémentaire, encore moins un système clos. C'est une condition — qui ne garantit ni harmonie ni salut, mais sans laquelle aucune +régulation ne peut être tenue comme monde. Cette condition peut +désormais être formulée simplement : une régulation ne devient habitable +qu'à la mesure où ce qui la fonde, ce qui l'opère et ce qui la met à +l'épreuve demeurent distinguables, articulés et exposables. Toute la +difficulté tient alors à ceci : maintenir cette distinction sans les +dissocier, et cette articulation sans les confondre. Là où ces +dimensions se confondent, se disjoignent ou se dérobent à l'exposition, +la régulation peut continuer à fonctionner ; elle cesse de se tenir. -Ce qui fonde une régulation ne se confond ni avec une autorité abstraite, ni avec un texte, ni avec une tradition invoquée une fois pour toutes ; cela renvoie à la capacité d’un ordre à exposer ses raisons comme telles. Ce qui opère désigne les instruments, procédures et dispositifs par lesquels le monde est effectivement découpé, distribué, transformé. Ce qui met à l’épreuve, enfin, ne relève ni d’une consultation formelle ni d’un recours marginal, mais de formes instituées où fondements, opérations et effets peuvent être suspendus, confrontés, repris. +C'est cette condition minimale que nous avons nommée archicratie. Ni +régime parmi d'autres, ni forme institutionnelle déterminée, ni idéal +moral à incarner : un seuil. Le seuil au-dessous duquel la régulation se +réduit à sa propre opérativité, et au-dessus duquel elle devient, au +moins en droit, habitable, parce qu'elle laisse ouverte la possibilité +de sa reprise. L'archicratie ne désigne ni la justice, ni la bonté, ni +la douceur des décisions ; elle désigne la condition sans laquelle ces +questions elles-mêmes cessent de pouvoir être posées politiquement. -Ces prises ne sont jamais données à l’état pur. Elles se recouvrent, se déplacent, se distribuent inégalement selon les configurations. Mais leur coprésence différenciée constitue la condition minimale d’une régulation vivable. Là où l’opération se déploie sans être reconduite à ses raisons, là où les décisions s’appliquent sans passer par des épreuves effectives, la régulation bascule vers une forme de fermeture qui ne relève ni du chaos ni du retrait du pouvoir, mais de son auto-suffisance. Dans une telle configuration, le pouvoir ne se retire pas ; il s’accomplit sans comparution. Il produit des effets, parfois avec une grande précision, mais sans se laisser reprendre dans des formes où ces effets pourraient être rapportés à des raisons discutables. Il opère, mais ne s’expose plus. Il décide, mais ne se laisse plus adresser. Tout fonctionne ; mais plus rien ne s’expose ni ne s’explique. +Ce qui fonde une régulation ne se confond ni avec une autorité +abstraite, ni avec un texte, ni avec une tradition invoquée une fois +pour toutes ; cela renvoie à la capacité d'un ordre à exposer ses +raisons comme telles. Ce qui opère désigne les instruments, procédures +et dispositifs par lesquels le monde est effectivement découpé, +distribué, transformé. Ce qui met à l'épreuve, enfin, ne relève ni d'une +consultation formelle ni d'un recours marginal, mais de formes +instituées où fondements, opérations et effets peuvent être suspendus, +confrontés, repris. -La différence décisive se situe là. Entre une régulation capable d’exécuter des procédures, de reproduire des normes, de gérer des flux, et une régulation capable de se rapporter à elle-même à partir de ce qu’elle affecte, la différence ne tient pas à l’intensité du pouvoir, mais à la possibilité de sa mise à l’épreuve. Ce qui rend un monde habitable n’est ni l’absence de tensions, ni la stabilité de ses équilibres, ni la pure efficacité de ses dispositifs. C’est la forme dans laquelle ce qui le traverse peut être porté sans être nié, différé sans être dissous, exposé sans être annihilé. +Ces prises ne sont jamais données à l'état pur. Elles se recouvrent, se +déplacent, se distribuent inégalement selon les configurations. Mais +leur coprésence différenciée constitue la condition minimale d'une +régulation vivable. Là où l'opération se déploie sans être reconduite à +ses raisons, là où les décisions s'appliquent sans passer par des +épreuves effectives, la régulation bascule vers une forme de fermeture +qui ne relève ni du chaos ni du retrait du pouvoir, mais de son +auto-suffisance. Dans une telle configuration, le pouvoir ne se retire +pas ; il s'accomplit sans comparution. Il produit des effets, parfois +avec une grande précision, mais sans se laisser reprendre dans des +formes où ces effets pourraient être rapportés à des raisons +discutables. Il opère, mais ne s'expose plus. Il décide, mais ne se +laisse plus adresser. Tout fonctionne ; mais plus rien ne s'expose ni ne +s'explique. -À partir de là, la question n’est plus d’abord celle d’un bon régime, mais celle d’un monde qui tient. Non d’un monde pacifié, homogène ou réconcilié, mais d’un monde capable de porter ce qui le traverse sans s’abolir dans sa propre exécution. Un monde qui ne tient ni par inertie, ni par répétition, ni par l’évidence supposée de ses fondements. Il tient parce qu’il est capable de porter ce qui le traverse sans le nier, de différer ce qui l’affecte sans le dissoudre, d’exposer ce qui le gouverne sans s’effondrer sous sa propre mise en question. Habiter un monde ne signifie pas simplement y vivre. Cela signifie pouvoir y comparaître. Pouvoir y demander d’où parle ce qui décide. Pouvoir y identifier ce qui opère. Pouvoir y rouvrir le temps lorsque l’exécution tend à se refermer sur elle-même. Pouvoir y faire apparaître ce qui, sans cela, demeurerait converti en variable, en score, en flux. +La différence décisive se situe là. Entre une régulation capable +d'exécuter des procédures, de reproduire des normes, de gérer des flux, +et une régulation capable de se rapporter à elle-même à partir de ce +qu'elle affecte, la différence ne tient pas à l'intensité du pouvoir, +mais à la possibilité de sa mise à l'épreuve. Ce qui rend un monde +habitable n'est ni l'absence de tensions, ni la stabilité de ses +équilibres, ni la pure efficacité de ses dispositifs. C'est la forme +dans laquelle ce qui le traverse peut être porté sans être nié, différé +sans être dissous, exposé sans être annihilé. -La scène prend ici son sens le plus fort. Elle n’est ni un supplément institutionnel, ni un décor ajouté au pouvoir pour en améliorer l’acceptabilité, ni une métaphore commode pour désigner des espaces de parole. Elle est l’une des formes à travers lesquelles un ordre cesse d’être purement opératoire pour devenir politiquement tenable. Là où il y a scène au sens fort — c’est-à-dire espace différé, documenté, institué, capable de suspendre et de requalifier — la régulation ne se contente pas d’agir : elle accepte de comparaître. C’est dans cette comparution que se joue la possibilité, pour un monde, de ne pas se réduire à ce qu’il exécute. +À partir de là, la question n'est plus d'abord celle d'un bon régime, +mais celle d'un monde qui tient. Non d'un monde pacifié, homogène ou +réconcilié, mais d'un monde capable de porter ce qui le traverse sans +s'abolir dans sa propre exécution. Un monde qui ne tient ni par inertie, +ni par répétition, ni par l'évidence supposée de ses fondements. Il +tient parce qu'il est capable de porter ce qui le traverse sans le nier, +de différer ce qui l'affecte sans le dissoudre, d'exposer ce qui le +gouverne sans s'effondrer sous sa propre mise en question. Habiter un +monde ne signifie pas simplement y vivre. Cela signifie pouvoir y +comparaître. Pouvoir y demander d'où parle ce qui décide. Pouvoir y +identifier ce qui opère. Pouvoir y rouvrir le temps lorsque l'exécution +tend à se refermer sur elle-même. Pouvoir y faire apparaître ce qui, +sans cela, demeurerait converti en variable, en score, en flux. -Il faut ici maintenir une distinction que tout ce travail a jugée décisive. Dire que la scène est condition de viabilité ne signifie nullement que toute scène serait en elle-même juste, démocratique ou émancipatrice. L’histoire des formes politiques, juridiques, religieuses, administratives, guerrières, marchandes ou sacrificielles montre au contraire que des scènes peuvent être violentes, dissymétriques, inquisitoriales, spectaculaires, capturées. La scène n’est pas bonne parce qu’elle apparaît ; elle devient politiquement décisive lorsqu’elle institue réellement l’épreuve de ce qu’elle expose. Ce qui compte n’est pas l’existence abstraite d’un lieu d’apparition, mais la possibilité effective qu’il ouvre : peut-on y demander les fondements ? Les instruments peuvent-ils y être rendus visibles ? Les effets peuvent-ils y être rapportés à ceux qu’ils affectent ? Le différé est-il réel ou purement fictif ? La suspension a-t-elle une force transformatrice ou n’est-elle qu’un rite sans prise ? +La scène prend ici son sens le plus fort. Elle n'est ni un supplément +institutionnel, ni un décor ajouté au pouvoir pour en améliorer +l'acceptabilité, ni une métaphore commode pour désigner des espaces de +parole. Elle est l'une des formes à travers lesquelles un ordre cesse +d'être purement opératoire pour devenir politiquement tenable. Là où il +y a scène au sens fort — c'est-à-dire espace différé, documenté, +institué, capable de suspendre et de requalifier — la régulation ne se +contente pas d'agir : elle accepte de comparaître. C'est dans cette +comparution que se joue la possibilité, pour un monde, de ne pas se +réduire à ce qu'il exécute. -Il n’en demeure pas moins que, sans scène, la régulation se dégrade qualitativement. Elle peut continuer à fonctionner ; elle peut même gagner en efficacité apparente. Mais elle perd sa mémoire, sa réversibilité, sa capacité à se rapporter à elle-même autrement que par recalibrage interne. Elle applique, classe, répartit, déclenche, module ; mais elle ne se reprend plus. Elle produit des normes sans en exposer les raisons, des décisions sans en instituer l’épreuve, des effets sans en organiser le retour. Elle tient encore ; mais elle ne sait plus répondre de la manière dont elle tient. C’est en ce point qu’un monde sans scène devient injustifiable. Non pas nécessairement injuste dans chacun de ses effets immédiats ; non pas chaotique ; non pas dépourvu de cohérence locale. Il peut très bien fonctionner, produire des résultats, stabiliser provisoirement des situations, maintenir des chaînes d’obéissance ou d’adaptation. Mais il devient injustifiable parce qu’il ne dispose plus des formes dans lesquelles ses propres décisions peuvent être rejouées, exposées, interrogées, reformulées. +Il faut ici maintenir une distinction que tout ce travail a jugée +décisive. Dire que la scène est condition de viabilité ne signifie +nullement que toute scène serait en elle-même juste, démocratique ou +émancipatrice. L'histoire des formes politiques, juridiques, +religieuses, administratives, guerrières, marchandes ou sacrificielles +montre au contraire que des scènes peuvent être violentes, +dissymétriques, inquisitoriales, spectaculaires, capturées. La scène +n'est pas bonne parce qu'elle apparaît ; elle devient politiquement +décisive lorsqu'elle institue réellement l'épreuve de ce qu'elle expose. +Ce qui compte n'est pas l'existence abstraite d'un lieu d'apparition, +mais la possibilité effective qu'il ouvre : peut-on y demander les +fondements ? Les instruments peuvent-ils y être rendus visibles ? Les +effets peuvent-ils y être rapportés à ceux qu'ils affectent ? Le différé +est-il réel ou purement fictif ? La suspension a-t-elle une force +transformatrice ou n'est-elle qu'un rite sans prise ? -On comprend alors ce que la co-viabilité signifie exactement. Elle ne désigne ni la simple coexistence de formes de vie différentes, ni leur compatibilité gestionnaire, ni un optimum de répartition des ressources ou des charges. Elle désigne la capacité, toujours fragile, toujours située, toujours révisable, d’un monde à instituer des formes dans lesquelles les hétérogènes qui le traversent peuvent être mis en tension sans être soit mutuellement détruits, soit administrativement neutralisés. Elle est moins un état qu’un régime d’épreuves. Elle ne se mesure pas seulement à l’efficacité des ajustements ; elle se mesure à la possibilité qu’un ordre laisse ouvert sa propre reprise à partir de ce qu’il affecte. +Il n'en demeure pas moins que, sans scène, la régulation se dégrade +qualitativement. Elle peut continuer à fonctionner ; elle peut même +gagner en efficacité apparente. Mais elle perd sa mémoire, sa +réversibilité, sa capacité à se rapporter à elle-même autrement que par +recalibrage interne. Elle applique, classe, répartit, déclenche, module +; mais elle ne se reprend plus. Elle produit des normes sans en exposer +les raisons, des décisions sans en instituer l'épreuve, des effets sans +en organiser le retour. Elle tient encore ; mais elle ne sait plus +répondre de la manière dont elle tient. C'est en ce point qu'un monde +sans scène devient injustifiable. Non pas nécessairement injuste dans +chacun de ses effets immédiats ; non pas chaotique ; non pas dépourvu de +cohérence locale. Il peut très bien fonctionner, produire des résultats, +stabiliser provisoirement des situations, maintenir des chaînes +d'obéissance ou d'adaptation. Mais il devient injustifiable parce qu'il +ne dispose plus des formes dans lesquelles ses propres décisions peuvent +être rejouées, exposées, interrogées, reformulées. -C’est à ce niveau que le diagnostic du présent trouve sa formulation la plus nette. Non dans l’idée d’un monde privé de régulation, mais dans celle d’un monde où la régulation tend à se déployer hors des formes qui permettaient de la tenir. Qu’il s’agisse des droits sociaux, de l’habitabilité écologique des milieux ou des architectures numériques de décision, la même logique se renforce : les dispositifs deviennent plus puissants au moment même où les formes capables d’en soutenir l’épreuve deviennent plus fragiles, plus tardives, plus périphériques. Ce ne sont pas les décisions qui disparaissent ; ce sont les manières dont elles pourraient être tenues. +On comprend alors ce que la co-viabilité signifie exactement. Elle ne +désigne ni la simple coexistence de formes de vie différentes, ni leur +compatibilité gestionnaire, ni un optimum de répartition des ressources +ou des charges. Elle désigne la capacité, toujours fragile, toujours +située, toujours révisable, d'un monde à instituer des formes dans +lesquelles les hétérogènes qui le traversent peuvent être mis en tension +sans être soit mutuellement détruits, soit administrativement +neutralisés. Elle est moins un état qu'un régime d'épreuves. Elle ne se +mesure pas seulement à l'efficacité des ajustements ; elle se mesure à +la possibilité qu'un ordre laisse ouvert sa propre reprise à partir de +ce qu'il affecte. -Les droits, dans de nombreuses configurations sociales, se trouvent intermédiés par des procédures dont la logique demeure difficilement accessible à ceux qu’elles affectent ; les décisions qui concernent l’habitabilité écologique des milieux se trouvent portées par des instruments puissants, mais rarement rapportées à des espaces où leurs fondements pourraient être disputés ; les architectures numériques et algorithmiques rendent possible une distribution fine des traitements, des classements, des accès, sans rendre aisément localisable le lieu de leur mise à l’épreuve. Ces dimensions ne doivent pas être comprises comme des sphères séparées. Elles constituent les expressions différenciées d’un même processus : celui par lequel la régulation tend à se déployer hors des formes d’épreuve qui permettaient de la tenir comme monde. +C'est à ce niveau que le diagnostic du présent trouve sa formulation la +plus nette. Non dans l'idée d'un monde privé de régulation, mais dans +celle d'un monde où la régulation tend à se déployer hors des formes qui +permettaient de la tenir. Qu'il s'agisse des droits sociaux, de +l'habitabilité écologique des milieux ou des architectures numériques de +décision, la même logique se renforce : les dispositifs deviennent plus +puissants au moment même où les formes capables d'en soutenir l'épreuve +deviennent plus fragiles, plus tardives, plus périphériques. Ce ne sont +pas les décisions qui disparaissent ; ce sont les manières dont elles +pourraient être tenues. -C’est en ce sens que l’autarchicratie peut être nommée comme la contre-figure terminale de l’archicratie. Non un régime au sens classique, ni une idéologie, ni un type d’État, mais une configuration dans laquelle la régulation tend à se refermer sur sa propre opérativité, à produire ses propres critères de validité, à s’auto-justifier sans passer par des épreuves effectives. Dans une telle configuration, les instruments, les modèles, les indicateurs, les procédures deviennent à la fois ce qui opère et ce qui justifie. Les boucles se ferment. Les ajustements se font à partir de leurs propres résultats. Les audits vérifient la conformité à des critères produits par les systèmes eux-mêmes. La régulation devient auto-référentielle. +Les droits, dans de nombreuses configurations sociales, se trouvent +intermédiés par des procédures dont la logique demeure difficilement +accessible à ceux qu'elles affectent ; les décisions qui concernent +l'habitabilité écologique des milieux se trouvent portées par des +instruments puissants, mais rarement rapportées à des espaces où leurs +fondements pourraient être disputés ; les architectures numériques et +algorithmiques rendent possible une distribution fine des traitements, +des classements, des accès, sans rendre aisément localisable le lieu de +leur mise à l'épreuve. Ces dimensions ne doivent pas être comprises +comme des sphères séparées. Elles constituent les expressions +différenciées d'un même processus : celui par lequel la régulation tend +à se déployer hors des formes d'épreuve qui permettaient de la tenir +comme monde. -Cette bascule ne doit pas être dramatisée comme si elle était totale, homogène, déjà accomplie. Des scènes subsistent, parfois robustes, parfois fragiles. Des espaces de contestation, de délibération, de reprise continuent d’exister. Mais ils apparaissent souvent comme disjoints des lieux où les décisions se prennent effectivement. La tension se joue moins entre présence et absence de scène qu’entre leur centralité et leur marginalisation. Le problème décisif n’est pas de savoir si toute scène a disparu ; il est de comprendre que la dynamique dominante tend à rendre optionnelle l’épreuve dont dépend pourtant la viabilité de la régulation. +C'est en ce sens que l'autarchicratie peut être nommée comme la +contre-figure terminale de l'archicratie. Non un régime au sens +classique, ni une idéologie, ni un type d'État, mais une configuration +dans laquelle la régulation tend à se refermer sur sa propre +opérativité, à produire ses propres critères de validité, à +s'auto-justifier sans passer par des épreuves effectives. Dans une telle +configuration, les instruments, les modèles, les indicateurs, les +procédures deviennent à la fois ce qui opère et ce qui justifie. Les +boucles se ferment. Les ajustements se font à partir de leurs propres +résultats. Les audits vérifient la conformité à des critères produits +par les systèmes eux-mêmes. La régulation devient auto-référentielle. -C’est ici que la distinction entre durabilité et co-viabilité prend toute sa force. La durabilité, telle qu’elle s’est imposée dans les discours contemporains, ne doit pas être critiquée d’abord pour ses intentions, mais pour sa forme. Elle tend à fonctionner comme un opérateur de neutralisation de la conflictualité : en posant comme objectif la préservation ou l’ajustement de certains équilibres, elle déplace l’attention vers la gestion des variables, l’optimisation des paramètres, la correction des trajectoires. Ce déplacement n’est pas illégitime en soi ; il le devient lorsqu’il s’accompagne d’une évacuation des formes dans lesquelles les choix qui structurent ces trajectoires pourraient être discutés. La durabilité peut alors s’accommoder d’une régulation sans scène. La co-viabilité, elle, en fait une impossibilité. +Cette bascule ne doit pas être dramatisée comme si elle était totale, +homogène, déjà accomplie. Des scènes subsistent, parfois robustes, +parfois fragiles. Des espaces de contestation, de délibération, de +reprise continuent d'exister. Mais ils apparaissent souvent comme +disjoints des lieux où les décisions se prennent effectivement. La +tension se joue moins entre présence et absence de scène qu'entre leur +centralité et leur marginalisation. Le problème décisif n'est pas de +savoir si toute scène a disparu ; il est de comprendre que la dynamique +dominante tend à rendre optionnelle l'épreuve dont dépend pourtant la +viabilité de la régulation. -La différence est décisive. La première tend à organiser la continuité des systèmes ; la seconde à instituer les conditions de leur reprise. La première privilégie l’ajustement des variables ; la seconde la mise à l’épreuve des fondements. La première peut se satisfaire d’une gouvernance qui corrige des déséquilibres ; la seconde exige des formes dans lesquelles les conditions mêmes de ces corrections peuvent être adressées, contestées, transformées. Ainsi comprise, la co-viabilité ne constitue pas un idéal abstrait. Elle désigne le régime minimal dans lequel un monde peut continuer à se transformer sans se soustraire à sa propre interrogation. Elle n’abolit pas les tensions ; elle en organise la tenue. Elle n’élimine pas les conflits ; elle en rend l’épreuve possible. Elle ne garantit pas la justice ; elle rend au moins pensable sa recherche. +C'est ici que la distinction entre durabilité et co-viabilité prend +toute sa force. La durabilité, telle qu'elle s'est imposée dans les +discours contemporains, ne doit pas être critiquée d'abord pour ses +intentions, mais pour sa forme. Elle tend à fonctionner comme un +opérateur de neutralisation de la conflictualité : en posant comme +objectif la préservation ou l'ajustement de certains équilibres, elle +déplace l'attention vers la gestion des variables, l'optimisation des +paramètres, la correction des trajectoires. Ce déplacement n'est pas +illégitime en soi ; il le devient lorsqu'il s'accompagne d'une +évacuation des formes dans lesquelles les choix qui structurent ces +trajectoires pourraient être discutés. La durabilité peut alors +s'accommoder d'une régulation sans scène. La co-viabilité, elle, en fait +une impossibilité. -Il reste alors à comprendre ce qui, en dernière instance, est affecté par cette transformation. Non pas seulement des institutions, des règles, des procédures, mais des formes d’existence. Des vies. Des milieux. Des devenirs. Si l’archicratie prend finalement une telle importance, ce n’est pas parce qu’elle offrirait une théorie plus satisfaisante du pouvoir ; c’est parce qu’elle reconduit l’analyse à ce qui, sans scène, devient politiquement illisible. Là où la régulation se déploie sous forme de flux, de calculs, de traitements, le vivant tend à être reconduit à des variables. Les milieux deviennent des stocks ou des contraintes. Les corps deviennent des profils, des trajectoires, des cas. Les expériences deviennent des données d’ajustement. Ce processus n’est pas nécessairement intentionnel. Il résulte de la logique même des dispositifs qui, pour fonctionner, doivent simplifier, catégoriser, standardiser. Mais cette simplification a un effet décisif : elle désinscrit le vivant de la scène. Elle le rend opérable sans qu’il ait à apparaître. +La différence est décisive. La première tend à organiser la continuité +des systèmes ; la seconde à instituer les conditions de leur reprise. La +première privilégie l'ajustement des variables ; la seconde la mise à +l'épreuve des fondements. La première peut se satisfaire d'une +gouvernance qui corrige des déséquilibres ; la seconde exige des formes +dans lesquelles les conditions mêmes de ces corrections peuvent être +adressées, contestées, transformées. Ainsi comprise, la co-viabilité ne +constitue pas un idéal abstrait. Elle désigne le régime minimal dans +lequel un monde peut continuer à se transformer sans se soustraire à sa +propre interrogation. Elle n'abolit pas les tensions ; elle en organise +la tenue. Elle n'élimine pas les conflits ; elle en rend l'épreuve +possible. Elle ne garantit pas la justice ; elle rend au moins pensable +sa recherche. -Le vivant ne disparaît pas ; il devient politiquement illisible. Il est là, partout affecté, mobilisé, transformé — mais de moins en moins capable de faire retour sur ce qui l’affecte. Un monde sans archicration est un monde dans lequel le vivant est présent sans être représentable, affecté sans être adressable, engagé sans être entendu. Il est pris dans des opérations, mais il ne peut plus apparaître comme ce à partir de quoi celles-ci devraient être interrogées. +Il reste alors à comprendre ce qui, en dernière instance, est affecté +par cette transformation. Non pas seulement des institutions, des +règles, des procédures, mais des formes d'existence. Des vies. Des +milieux. Des devenirs. Si l'archicratie prend finalement une telle +importance, ce n'est pas parce qu'elle offrirait une théorie plus +satisfaisante du pouvoir ; c'est parce qu'elle reconduit l'analyse à ce +qui, sans scène, devient politiquement illisible. Là où la régulation se +déploie sous forme de flux, de calculs, de traitements, le vivant tend à +être reconduit à des variables. Les milieux deviennent des stocks ou des +contraintes. Les corps deviennent des profils, des trajectoires, des +cas. Les expériences deviennent des données d'ajustement. Ce processus +n'est pas nécessairement intentionnel. Il résulte de la logique même des +dispositifs qui, pour fonctionner, doivent simplifier, catégoriser, +standardiser. Mais cette simplification a un effet décisif : elle +désinscrit le vivant de la scène. Elle le rend opérable sans qu'il ait à +apparaître. -C’est en ce sens que l’oblitération archicratique produit une crise de reconnaissance. Non pas au sens restreint d’une reconnaissance morale ou symbolique, mais au sens plus fondamental d’une reconnaissance comme condition d’apparition dans un espace où l’on peut être pris en compte. Reconnaître ne signifie pas simplement identifier ou décrire. Cela signifie instituer des formes dans lesquelles ce qui est affecté peut être reconduit à une scène, où il peut être exposé, où il peut entrer en relation avec ce qui décide. Sans cette reconnaissance, le vivant peut être protégé, géré, optimisé ; il ne peut pas être politiquement tenu. +Le vivant ne disparaît pas ; il devient politiquement illisible. Il est +là, partout affecté, mobilisé, transformé — mais de moins en moins +capable de faire retour sur ce qui l'affecte. Un monde sans archicration +est un monde dans lequel le vivant est présent sans être représentable, +affecté sans être adressable, engagé sans être entendu. Il est pris dans +des opérations, mais il ne peut plus apparaître comme ce à partir de +quoi celles-ci devraient être interrogées. -Il faut alors comprendre que la question de la scène n’est pas extérieure à celle de la liberté. Elle en constitue l’une des conditions minimales. Non la liberté comme autonomie absolue, mais comme possibilité d’intervenir sur les conditions qui nous affectent. Une société qui ne dispose plus de formes dans lesquelles ses propres régulations puissent être interrogées tend à se percevoir comme soumise à des nécessités. Elle perd la capacité de distinguer ce qui relève de contraintes inévitables et ce qui relève de choix. À l’inverse, une société qui institue des épreuves se dote de la possibilité de se rapporter à elle-même comme à un ensemble de décisions révisables. Elle ne supprime pas les contraintes, mais elle les inscrit dans des formes où elles peuvent être discutées. +C'est en ce sens que l'oblitération archicratique produit une crise de +reconnaissance. Non pas au sens restreint d'une reconnaissance morale ou +symbolique, mais au sens plus fondamental d'une reconnaissance comme +condition d'apparition dans un espace où l'on peut être pris en compte. +Reconnaître ne signifie pas simplement identifier ou décrire. Cela +signifie instituer des formes dans lesquelles ce qui est affecté peut +être reconduit à une scène, où il peut être exposé, où il peut entrer en +relation avec ce qui décide. Sans cette reconnaissance, le vivant peut +être protégé, géré, optimisé ; il ne peut pas être politiquement tenu. -À ce point, aucune réponse définitive ne peut être apportée. Aucun modèle achevé ne peut être proposé. Mais une exigence demeure, désormais visible et irréductible. Un monde ne devient inhabitable ni parce qu’il est traversé de tensions, ni parce qu’il doit décider dans l’incertitude, ni parce qu’il affronte des contraintes puissantes. Il le devient lorsqu’il ne dispose plus des formes capables de porter ce qui le traverse autrement que par la pure exécution. Ce qui est en jeu n’est ni la suppression du conflit, ni l’optimisation des dispositifs, ni la stabilisation d’un équilibre. Ce qui est en jeu, c’est la possibilité de maintenir ouvertes les formes dans lesquelles un monde peut se rapporter à lui-même à partir de ce qu’il affecte. La possibilité, toujours fragile, toujours menacée, de ne pas confondre ce qui fonctionne avec ce qui se tient. +Il faut alors comprendre que la question de la scène n'est pas +extérieure à celle de la liberté. Elle en constitue l'une des conditions +minimales. Non la liberté comme autonomie absolue, mais comme +possibilité d'intervenir sur les conditions qui nous affectent. Une +société qui ne dispose plus de formes dans lesquelles ses propres +régulations puissent être interrogées tend à se percevoir comme soumise +à des nécessités. Elle perd la capacité de distinguer ce qui relève de +contraintes inévitables et ce qui relève de choix. À l'inverse, une +société qui institue des épreuves se dote de la possibilité de se +rapporter à elle-même comme à un ensemble de décisions révisables. Elle +ne supprime pas les contraintes, mais elle les inscrit dans des formes +où elles peuvent être discutées. -Rendre à la régulation les formes dans lesquelles elle peut encore être tenue comme monde : telle est l’exigence à laquelle reconduit l’ensemble de ce parcours. Non comme un programme, ni comme une promesse, mais comme ce sans quoi aucune transformation ne peut être habitée. Car ce n’est jamais l’ordre seul qui fait tenir un monde. C’est la possibilité, pour cet ordre, d’être interrompu, exposé, repris. Là où cette possibilité se ferme, le monde peut continuer à marcher ; il cesse peu à peu d’être habitable. Là où elle demeure ouverte, fût-ce dans le conflit, sous contrainte, précairement, quelque chose du politique subsiste encore : non la paix, ni l’innocence, ni l’harmonie, mais la capacité d’un monde à ne pas se confondre avec sa propre exécution. +À ce point, aucune réponse définitive ne peut être apportée. Aucun +modèle achevé ne peut être proposé. Mais une exigence demeure, désormais +visible et irréductible. Un monde ne devient inhabitable ni parce qu'il +est traversé de tensions, ni parce qu'il doit décider dans +l'incertitude, ni parce qu'il affronte des contraintes puissantes. Il le +devient lorsqu'il ne dispose plus des formes capables de porter ce qui +le traverse autrement que par la pure exécution. Ce qui est en jeu n'est +ni la suppression du conflit, ni l'optimisation des dispositifs, ni la +stabilisation d'un équilibre. Ce qui est en jeu, c'est la possibilité de +maintenir ouvertes les formes dans lesquelles un monde peut se rapporter +à lui-même à partir de ce qu'il affecte. La possibilité, toujours +fragile, toujours menacée, de ne pas confondre ce qui fonctionne avec ce +qui se tient. + +Rendre à la régulation les formes dans lesquelles elle peut encore être +tenue comme monde : telle est l'exigence à laquelle reconduit l'ensemble +de ce parcours. Non comme un programme, ni comme une promesse, mais +comme ce sans quoi aucune transformation ne peut être habitée. Car ce +n'est jamais l'ordre seul qui fait tenir un monde. C'est la possibilité, +pour cet ordre, d'être interrompu, exposé, repris. Là où cette +possibilité se ferme, le monde peut continuer à marcher ; il cesse peu à +peu d'être habitable. Là où elle demeure ouverte, fût-ce dans le +conflit, sous contrainte, précairement, quelque chose du politique +subsiste encore : non la paix, ni l'innocence, ni l'harmonie, mais la +capacité d'un monde à ne pas se confondre avec sa propre exécution. diff --git a/src/content/archicrat-ia/prologue.mdx b/src/content/archicrat-ia/prologue.mdx index e805d1a..fef1e8f 100644 --- a/src/content/archicrat-ia/prologue.mdx +++ b/src/content/archicrat-ia/prologue.mdx @@ -1,295 +1,1440 @@ --- -title: "Prologue — Fondation, finalité sociopolitique et historique" -edition: "archicrat-ia" -status: "essai_these" +title: Prologue — Fondation, finalité sociopolitique et historique +edition: archicrat-ia +status: essai_these level: 1 -version: "0.1.0" +version: 0.1.0 concepts: [] links: [] order: 10 -summary: "" +summary: '' source: kind: docx - path: "sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Prologue—Archicratie-fondation_et_finalite_sociopolitique_et_historique-version_officielle.docx" + path: sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Prologue—Archicratie-fondation_et_finalite_sociopolitique_et_historique-version_officielle.docx --- -Nous vivons une époque saturée de diagnostics sur les formes de domination, les mutations du pouvoir, les détournements de la souveraineté. Depuis une vingtaine d’années, les appellations s’accumulent : *démocratie illibérale*, *ploutocratie*, *happycratie*, *gouvernement algorithmique*, *démocrature*… À travers ces tentatives de nommer le désordre du présent, un fait se répète, de manière sourde : la scène politique semble désorientée. Les catégories héritées — *État*, *pouvoir*, *représentation*, *volonté générale*, *contrat social* — apparaissent de moins en moins capables de décrire ce qui nous gouverne effectivement. -C’est cette perte de prise sur le réel que ce livre souhaite prendre au sérieux. Non pour lui ajouter un terme de plus au lexique fatigué des contre-pouvoirs ou des impuissances, mais pour repartir d’un point plus fondamental, presque en-deçà de la question politique classique. Ce point, c’est celui de la *tenue d’un monde commun* — c’est-à-dire la possibilité, pour des êtres dissemblables, vulnérables, inégaux, traversés de contradictions et situés dans des temporalités hétérogènes, de coexister sans s’annihiler. - -Il ne s’agit pas, pour autant, de substituer à la théorie politique classique une clé universelle qui prétendrait tout absorber. Le déplacement proposé ici a une portée plus précise : rendre plus lisibles certaines configurations où les catégories héritées — pouvoir, souveraineté, représentation, gouvernement — décrivent encore des formes, mais n’éclairent plus suffisamment les conditions effectives de la régulation. Là où ce déplacement n’apporte aucun gain réel d’intelligibilité, il doit rester secondaire, voire s’effacer. - -Cette tenue du monde n’équivaut ni à la paix civile, ni à la stabilité des institutions, ni à l’ordre établi. C’est une difficulté conceptuelle que d’envisager *la possibilité pour un ordre de durer sans s’effondrer*, alors même qu’il est traversé en permanence par des forces et des légitimités qui le travaillent, l’éprouvent, le modifient, l’usent, le contestent, le prolongent ou le sapent. Cette possibilité de tenir le monde commun, nous la nommons *co-viabilité*. - -Le terme n’est pas trivial. Il ne désigne ni une simple viabilité partagée, ni une coexistence pacifiée, ni une durabilité écologique élargie. Il renvoie à la possibilité, toujours fragile, pour un monde hétérogène de maintenir une existence viable en travaillant, sans les abolir, les tensions qui le traversent. - -La *co-viabilité* ne désigne ni un état d’équilibre, ni une finalité normative. Elle nomme un état dynamique et instable, dans lequel un ensemble — une société, un système biologique, une formation historique, un milieu technique ou un monde institué — tient non pas par homogénéité ou harmonie, mais parce qu’il parvient à réguler ce qui le menace sans se détruire lui-même. Il compose entre des éléments hétérogènes — forces d’inertie et d’innovation, attachements profonds et ruptures nécessaires — sans chercher à les unifier. C’est cette disposition active, faite de compromis fragiles et d’ajustements toujours révisables, que nous tenons pour première, et non dérivée. - -Ce déplacement conduit à rehiérarchiser la question politique elle-même. Nous ne nous limiterons pas à demander qui commande ou qui gouverne, mais chercherons à comprendre comment un ordre tient malgré ce qui le travaille, le conteste, l’use ou le défait. La question du commandement ne disparaît pas ; elle cesse d’être suffisante dès lors que les prises réelles de la régulation se distribuent dans des agencements, des temporalités, des médiations et des scènes d’épreuve qui excèdent les figures classiques du pouvoir. Et surtout nous interrogerons : *Quels sont les dispositifs qui permettent à une société de ne pas se désagréger sous l’effet de ses propres contradictions ?* - -Cette bascule de perspective prolonge des intuitions anciennes. Max Weber (*Économie et société*, 1922) rappelait que ce qui fait tenir un ordre, ce n’est pas seulement la force ou la loi, mais les « chances de validité » socialement reconnues. Norbert Elias (*La dynamique de l’Occident*, 1939/1975) montrait, quant à lui, que les sociétés se maintiennent par des équilibres toujours précaires entre interdépendances, rivalités et pacifications. Notre démarche s’inscrit dans ce sillage : travailler cette interrogation sur les *conditions de viabilité d’un monde commun*. - -Ce changement de perspective implique une rupture profonde dans la manière même de poser la question politique. Pendant des siècles, les sociétés ont pensé le politique à partir de principes transcendants — Dieu, Nature, Volonté générale, Pacte social. Ces principes, supposés extérieurs aux conflits du présent, garantissaient l’ordre en surplomb. Comme le rappelle Michel Foucault, il n’y a pas de principe extérieur au jeu des forces : seulement des rapports de pouvoir situés, modulés, réversibles. C’est précisément cette exigence — trouver dans les relations elles-mêmes les ressources nécessaires pour maintenir des mondes vivables — qui définit notre époque. - -Ce qui émerge, ce ne sont pas de nouveaux principes ni une nouvelle idéologie, mais une exigence beaucoup plus modeste, et aussi beaucoup plus difficile à satisfaire : celle de trouver dans les relations elles-mêmes — entre groupes, entre institutions, entre individus, entre temporalités — les ressources nécessaires pour maintenir leurs mondes viables. Autrement dit : c’est *dans* les tensions, *à même* les conflits, *au sein* des alliances, *au cœur* des désaccords et des polémiques, que semble se construire la régulation. Non plus *au-dessus*, par un décret transcendant, mais *au-dedans*, par un agencement toujours révisable. C’est cela que nous voulons dire — sans technicité inutile — quand nous parlons d’un déplacement vers une *instance de régulation située de co-viabilité* : un espace commun où les forces hétérogènes, souvent antagonistes, peuvent coexister, se contredire, se confronter, s’éprouver, sans se détruire mutuellement. - -Penser le politique depuis cette approche, c’est renoncer à l’idée même qu’un ordre puisse se fonder définitivement, une fois pour toutes. C’est reconnaître que ce qui fait tenir une société n’est jamais un principe unique, un commandement souverain, une légitimité première, mais *un espace d’épreuve toujours rejoué* où se négocient, se recadrent, s’opposent, s’ajustent des forces hétérogènes dont l’accord est constamment partiel, toujours temporaire, perpétuellement instable. - -Par conséquent, un ordre durerait moins par ses fondements proclamés que par ses *capacités régulatrices effectives*. Autant dire que ce sont les dispositifs, les formats, les médiations — parfois massifs, parfois imperceptibles — par lesquels un ordre parvient à faire coexister ce qui, en droit, pourrait s’exclure : des intérêts antagonistes, des affects discordants, des récits historiques incompatibles, des régimes de valeur irréconciliables, des temporalités sociales déphasées, des exigences contradictoires en matière de justice, d’efficacité, de mémoire ou d’avenir. - -Cet ordre ne les efface pas. Il ne les réconcilie pas dans un consensus fictif. Il ne les fusionne pas dans une synthèse idéologique illusoire. Il les tient ensemble sans les résoudre, par des équilibres instables, des arrangements contingents, des formats d’ajustement plus ou moins durables. C’est là que se situe toute la puissance — et la fragilité — de la régulation : tenir sans annuler, moduler sans effacer, organiser sans clore. - -Cette capacité régulatrice, si elle échappe aux regards, n’en est pas moins structurante. Elle repose sur des agencements concrets, souvent silencieux, mais puissamment opératoires : une réforme budgétaire qui stabilise un conflit de génération sans le nommer ; un indicateur économique qui requalifie des arbitrages sociaux sans débat préalable ; un protocole logistique qui reconfigure la hiérarchie entre producteurs et distributeurs sans qu’aucune loi ne l’impose. Chaque fois, il y a régulation sans visibilité, composition sans consensus, opération sans fondement explicite. - -Il ne faut donc pas s’y tromper : ce que nous décrivons ici ne relève ni d’un effondrement soudain, ni d’un basculement spectaculaire, mais d’un déplacement discret — pourtant d’une portée considérable : la désactivation lente et diffuse des opérateurs classiques de lisibilité du politique. Ce qui se défait sous nos yeux est une grammaire d’interprétation, un outillage cognitif collectif, une capacité de mise en récit. Et ce processus est loin d’être anodin. - -Il y eut un temps — disons moderne — où l’on pouvait encore localiser les lieux de pouvoir, identifier les détenteurs de l’autorité, délimiter les instances de délibération, nommer les figures de légitimation. On pouvait encore croire que la loi émanait d’un espace visible, que la souveraineté résidait quelque part, que la représentation engageait effectivement une parole au nom d’un collectif déterminé. Ce temps — sans avoir disparu totalement — a cessé de produire des repères fonctionnels. Car si les formes demeurent — constitutions, institutions, procédures, déclarations —, une part décisive des arbitrages réels s’est déplacée hors de leur emprise. Le centre de gravité régulateur a migré vers des configurations hors des prises démocratiques. - -Désormais, ce sont des métriques qui tranchent à la place des normes, des calculs prédictifs qui se substituent aux débats. Les interfaces filtrent les droits et les voix sans qu’aucune instance délibérative n’ait statué sur leurs paramètres. Les arbitrages majeurs — ceux qui orientent les seuils d’émission de gaz à effet de serre, la sélection scolaire, les répartitions budgétaires, les politiques de logement, les trajectoires de migration, ou l’organisation des chaînes d’approvisionnement mondialisées — ne sont plus discutés collectivement, mais disséminés dans des protocoles techniques, financiers, juridiques, algorithmiques, souvent conçus hors scène, et inaccessibles à toute mise en cause publique. - -Cela ne veut pas dire que le politique ait disparu, mais plutôt qu’il tend peu à peu à se rendre indiscernable. Il ne s’exerce plus à travers des figures lisibles, mais à travers des chaînes d’acteurs, des scripts techniques, des formats d’optimisation, des boucles de retour automatisées. Cette dissémination ne relève pas d’une abstraction théorique ou d’un soupçon idéologique : elle se manifeste chaque jour dans des configurations concrètes, reconnaissables, pourtant rarement nommées pour ce qu’elles sont. Son efficacité tient précisément à sa banalité. Car désormais, ce ne sont plus des figures du commandement qui décident en surplomb, mais des dispositifs encastrés, des logiques de fonctionnement intégrées à des protocoles d’apparence neutre. - -C’est un marché carbone qui, au nom de seuils agrégés à l’échelle continentale, conduit à la fermeture d’un site industriel local, sans qu’aucune figure politique ne puisse rendre visible ni opposable l’arbitrage opéré. C’est un algorithme de régulation hospitalière qui, face à une tension budgétaire ou épidémiologique, déprogramme automatiquement des interventions chirurgicales — sans qu’aucun médecin, aucun patient, aucun responsable politique ne puisse véritablement en discuter les critères. C’est une plateforme numérique de traitement des titres de séjour qui suspend une demande pour “anomalie de saisie”, sans contact humain, sans justification claire, sans voie de recours instituée. C’est un logiciel de pilotage budgétaire, adossé à des indicateurs d’efficience, qui impose la réduction d’une politique sociale sans passage par une arène délibérative. C’est aussi un score algorithmique de risque bancaire qui écarte discrètement une famille d’un prêt, bien avant qu’elle ait pu formuler son projet. - -Contrairement aux apparences, ce qui s’offre au regard n’est plus la figure massive du pouvoir trônant dans la clarté de ses apparats, mais la trame patiente d’une régulation en mouvement. Les instances fixes ont disparu ; la demeure solennelle de l’autorité s’est effacée. Le geste réel de gouvernance s’insinue dans des protocoles, se glisse dans la routine, s’entrelace dans les habitudes, se ramifie dans d’innombrables appareils sans visage. Nul acte inaugural n’en marque ostensiblement la naissance, nulle proclamation n’en scande les rythmes. On constate seulement que la régulation avance sans fracas et tisse patiemment la toile discrète sur laquelle se déplacent nos vies. Ce ne sont plus tant le décret ou la loi qui pèsent que les enchevêtrements de normes, l’imperceptible maillage de procédures et l’ajustement continu de directives flexibles. - -La contrainte n’accable plus par l’ostentation de l’ordre, mais s’inocule par la subtilité des systèmes. Désormais, l’agencement d’équilibres, de données et de flux façonne un monde où chacun se trouve relié, indexé, impliqué dans cette dentelle administrative, sans jamais croiser le centre, sans jamais savoir nommer celui ou ce qui agit. La régulation moderne tresse ainsi un univers de seuils mobiles et d’agencements souples, où l’on ne peut jamais tout à fait fixer le moment ni le lieu du pouvoir agissant — mais où, à chaque pli de la vie collective, se lit l’empreinte d’une architecture invisible. - -La difficulté d’y résister tient moins à une violence perceptible qu’à l’évidence ontologique de ces dispositifs. Ils ne s’avancent pas comme des autorités, ne se proclament pas comme pouvoir : ils fonctionnent, nous relient et, ce faisant, opèrent. Et cette opération sans légitimation démocratique — pouvoir sans figure, contrainte sans théâtre — rend caduques nos anciennes grilles d’interprétation. Désormais, ce qui nous affecte le plus ne s’énonce plus ; il s’impose sans discours jusqu’au plus intime. - -Cela signifie que le politique s’est décousu de ses formes historiques. Il continue d’agir, de décider, d’orienter — mais sous d’autres modalités, dans d’autres lieux, avec d’autres instruments, selon des régimes d’opérativité qu’aucune des catégories anciennes ne parvient plus à saisir, à rendre intelligible et à traduire sans trahir. - -Autrement dit, nous avons changé d’époque sans encore avoir pu changer de lexique. Nous continuons de penser avec des formes obsolètes des processus qui s’activent sous nos yeux et les excèdent de toutes parts. Nous parlons de gouvernements, là où il faudrait parler de structures de régulation composite. Nous discutons de lois, là où il faudrait décrire des protocoles, des seuils, des scénographies d’ajustement, des mécanismes de *feedback* algorithmique, des normes sans normalisateurs. - -Cette disjonction entre l’expérience vécue de la contrainte et le vocabulaire disponible pour la dire n’est pas qu’un problème théorique. Elle produit une désorientation profonde. Elle empêche de penser le réel, de localiser les responsabilités et rend inopérantes les critiques. Elle altère la capacité collective à formuler des exigences, jusqu’à dissoudre les repères et les registres d’action. - -Cette impuissance démocratique généralisée à nommer, situer et orienter les formes réelles de la régulation se donne parfois à voir dans des situations d’apparente clarté. L’exemple de la taxe Zucman en fournit une illustration nette. Le principe est lisible, le diagnostic largement documenté, l’injustice repérée, l’objet débattu. Et pourtant, l’effectuation demeure suspendue : pas de dispositif stable, pas d’instance suffisamment puissante et opposable, pas de scène capable de convertir l’intelligibilité d’un problème en régulation effective. Ce cas importe moins ici pour son contenu fiscal propre que pour la structure qu’il rend visible : une idée peut être reconnue, discutée, parfois même validée publiquement, sans trouver pour autant la forme institutionnelle, technique et politique qui permettrait de la porter jusqu’à l’effectivité. - -Ce hiatus entre l’enjeu perceptible dans l’espace public et le blocage des régulations effectives constitue l’un des symptômes majeurs du présent. Il ne renvoie pas seulement à une crise des institutions, mais à une crise de lisibilité de la régulation elle-même : nous peinons de plus en plus à nommer ce qui nous oblige, à situer ce qui nous gouverne et à identifier ce qui continue de structurer nos appartenances. - -À mesure que les instruments du pouvoir deviennent techniques, que les décisions se diluent dans des protocoles, que les normes se déterritorialisent dans des scripts ou des seuils, la question de la régulation glisse en dehors du périmètre politique, comme si elle n’avait plus de lieu propre, plus d’arène reconnaissable, plus de langage pour s’énoncer. Le politique ne disparaît pas — il se désinscrit, il se dissimule dans d’autres formats, il s’internalise dans les infrastructures, il se pulvérise dans des régularités sans délibération démocratique. - -Et face à cette évanescence, deux réflexes s’affrontent. L’un, nostalgique, cherche à réhabiliter les anciennes figures du pouvoir : l’autorité, la loi, la souveraineté, comme si elles pouvaient encore réactiver un ordre en désagrégation. L’autre, sceptique, postule qu’il n’y a plus rien à faire — que nous vivons l’épuisement définitif de l’arène politique, sa disparition dans le flux, le calcul, le désordre entropique des systèmes. - -Pour autant, quelque chose continue d’agir, de structurer, de différencier, même en l’absence de pouvoir identifiable. Ce quelque chose, c’est la manière dont une société régule ses tensions internes : non plus en les effaçant, mais en les tenant, en les exposant, en les configurant dans des dispositifs — visibles ou non — capables de contenir sans abolir, de moduler sans figer, de différer sans éluder. - -Nous devons donc reprendre à neuf la question la plus enfouie de la politique : *qu’est-ce qui fait qu’un monde collectif tient ?* Non plus dans l’abstrait, mais dans la matérialité de ses pratiques, la texture de ses conflits, l’architecture de ses médiations. *Par quels agencements tient-il ?* *À travers quelles épreuves ? Selon quelles temporalités ? Et sous quelles conditions de réversibilité ?* - -Car il ne suffit plus de dire que le pouvoir est diffus, que les normes sont flexibles, que les algorithmes décident. Encore faut-il comprendre comment ces formes apparemment dispersées composent — ou échouent à composer — un monde co-viable, c’est-à-dire capable de réguler sans brutaliser, de transformer sans dissoudre, d’être robuste et de résister sans exclure. C’est là, dans cette capacité à organiser la tension sans basculer dans la clôture ni dans le chaos, que se joue le cœur du politique contemporain — non plus comme souveraineté, mais comme scénographie régulatrice. - -Mais cette scénographie, aujourd’hui, est inopérante. Soit elle est fantomatique — laissée à l’abandon, réduite à un formalisme creux. Soit elle est confisquée — captée par des dispositifs opaques, des rationalités techniques, des opérateurs propriétaires fermés. Dans les deux cas, ce qui est mis en péril, ce n’est pas uniquement l’idée de démocratie ou le jeu des institutions, mais la possibilité même d’un monde de confrontation et de controverse, d’un espace commun où la régulation pourrait être rendue visible, négociable, opposable, réversible. - -Or ce qui s’efface désormais, c’est la capacité collective à en formuler les conditions, à en penser les formes, à en situer les nouvelles arènes de pouvoir. Ce qui s’érode, plus encore qu’une architecture institutionnelle, c’est notre aptitude à dire ce qui oblige, à comprendre ce qui ajuste, à situer ce qui contraint. L’étrangeté du présent ne réside pas dans une hypertrophie du pouvoir — comme on le répète trop souvent — mais dans un brouillage profond de ses modes d’existence. Nous ne savons plus vraiment comment le pouvoir s’exerce, où il opère, par quels instruments il module, ni selon quels critères il ajuste. Et pourtant, nous continuons de mobiliser les mêmes mots : *monarchie*, *oligarchie*, *démocratie*, *technocratie*, *bureaucratie*, *ploutocratie*, *méritocratie*… Comme si ces termes suffisaient encore à décrire ce qui nous affecte. - -Ces termes politiques s’organisent autour de deux grands suffixes — *-archie* et *-cratie* — forgés dans les débats de la Grèce antique, et largement sédimentés dans les lexiques modernes. Les suffixes en -*archie* désignent un *pouvoir fondé sur un principe premier* (*arkhè*), une origine ou une légitimité verticale : monarchie, oligarchie, etc. Ceux en -*cratie* désignent plutôt les *modalités pratiques d’exercice du pouvoir* (*kratos*) : démocratie, technocratie, bureaucratie, etc. - -Cette distinction entre fondement et exercice, légitimation et opération, traverse toute la modernité politique. Cependant, cette séparation ne permet plus aujourd’hui de saisir la réalité des régulations effectives. Car les scènes d’*arkhè* se sont en grande partie effondrées sans être remplacées, tandis que les *kratos* contemporains tendent à s’exercer sans adresse, sans représentation, sans théâtre. L’on disserte sur les vertus de la démocratie, mais le *dèmos* n’a plus de lieu de confrontation effective : *serait-ce la rue ? Seraient-ce les réseaux sociaux ? Seraient-ce les médias ? Serait-ce le Parlement ?* - -Force est de constater qu’aucun de ces espaces n’assure aujourd’hui, à lui seul, une scène de confrontation effective : la rue est souvent contenue ou réprimée ; les réseaux sociaux filtrent, segmentent et compartimentent les prises de parole ; les grands médias sont soumis à une forte concentration capitalistique ; et le Parlement ne parvient plus, à lui seul, à représenter ni à articuler l’ensemble de la conflictualité sociale. - -L’on invoque la République, mais la *res publica* — la chose publique, appellation la plus vague et la plus creuse que l’on puisse donner de l’espace politique — se dissout dans des logiques qui échappent à toute délibération commune : absence de débat, passage en force, brutalisme institutionnel. - -Quant au langage politique, il continue d’énoncer des structures et des projets, mais il ne parvient pas à décrire les opérations effectives de régulation, tant le système socio-économique, en plus de s’être libéralisé et privatisé, s’est étendu et complexifié tout en confiant les leviers d’action au niveau supranational. - -C’est précisément cette disjonction — entre les principes supposés légitimer le pouvoir, et les dispositifs qui en assurent l’effectuation — qui produit aujourd’hui notre impuissance à penser la régulation. Car aucun de ces termes ne dit où se tiennent les tensions, comment elles sont traitées, par quelles instances elles sont articulées. Les -archies contemporaines ne garantissent plus, à elles seules, la dispute effective de leurs fondements ; et les -craties existantes n’organisent plus, à elles seules, les conditions suffisantes de leur opposabilité. Tandis que nous continuons à nommer des formes de régime, les processus réels de régulation se déplacent vers des configurations où la mise à l’épreuve devient intermittente, captée, relocalisée ou pratiquement inaccessible, au point d’échapper à tout espace visible d’épreuve. Jusqu’à présent, ils opèrent privés de contradictoire, dépourvus de délai, amputés d’institutions de réversibilité. Autrement dit : nous sommes gouvernés sans être gouvernés, régulés sans régulation légitimée, affectés sans instance délibérative. - -Cette dissociation — entre pouvoir nommé et régulation agissante — peut sembler abstraite. Elle ne l’est pas. Un cas devenu emblématique en offre la preuve saisissante. Entre 2010 et 2011, l’État belge a connu une situation institutionnelle inédite — près de 540 jours sans gouvernement fédéral de plein exercice. Aucun exécutif formel, aucun nouveau mandat, aucune majorité parlementaire opérationnelle. Et pourtant, rien ne s’est effondré. Les institutions ont continué à fonctionner. Les services publics ont été assurés. L’économie n’a pas sombré. La diplomatie s’est poursuivie. Et la société belge a tenu malgré les tensions communautaires. - -Cet épisode, souvent évoqué sur le ton de l’anecdote, mérite d’être considéré ici comme un symptôme politique majeur. Il indique que la régulation ne passe plus nécessairement par la verticalité du pouvoir, mais par des dispositifs latents, des agencements structurels, des inerties normatives et des coordinations transversales ou distribuées. Il montre qu’un ordre peut fonctionner sans fondement renouvelé, tenir sans pilotage, résister sans commande visible. Pierre Rosanvallon le soulignait (*La Légitimité démocratique*, 2008), en affirmant que les sociétés reposent aussi sur des « formes de légitimité latentes », moins spectaculaires que le vote ou la loi, mais non moins décisives. L’expérience belge illustre avec force cette persistance d’une régulation sans gouvernement explicite. Ce phénomène suggère que l’architecture régulatrice n’est plus identifiable aux lieux habituels de la souveraineté. - -Pour autant, le pouvoir n’a pas disparu ; il s’exerce désormais depuis d’autres formes que celles qui le légitimaient. Il s’est délocalisé, désinstitutionnalisé, déréférencé — tout en continuant à structurer silencieusement la vie collective. Et c’est dans cet écart grandissant — entre l’absence de gouvernement et la persistance d’une régulation — que se dessine le cœur de la problématique contemporaine : pour nombre d’entre nous, nous continuons à chercher le pouvoir là où il n’est plus, et à négliger les régulations implicites là où elles deviennent de plus en plus décisives. - -Pour que ces dispositifs puissent fonctionner ainsi, discrètement et efficacement, sans qu’on puisse les identifier ni les contester, il faut d’abord que les lieux où ils auraient pu être exposés, discutés ou débattus soient neutralisés, effacés, disqualifiés ou rendus inutiles. Les lieux de pouvoir s’évaporent progressivement, les moyens d’expression se désagrègent, et les cadres d’appel à la responsabilité deviennent inaudibles. L’arène du politique ne disparaît pas brutalement, elle se désagrège lentement à mesure que ses conditions d’existence — la mise en scène, la confrontation et la mise à l’épreuve — se retirent. - -Les anciens espaces d’exposition — Parlement, place publique, journal, commission, agora, tribune — ne remplissent plus leur fonction instituante. Non qu’ils aient été abolis : ils subsistent, mais tournent à vide, pris dans la superposition d’éléments de langage, dans des logiques oblitératrices, dans l’interruption des moments d’interpellation et dans l’empêchement des pensées contre-propositionnelles. Ils parlent sans prise. Ils évoquent sans effet. Ils promettent sans adossement réel. En somme, ils hypnotisent et désactivent. Et tandis qu’ils persistent comme formes, les lieux effectifs de la régulation — là où s’arbitrent réellement les seuils, s’ajustent véritablement les normes, se décident les niveaux de tolérance ou d’exclusion — se déplacent hors de la portée de tous. - -Cette désactivation des anciennes scènes de visibilité ne relève pas d’une abstraction — elle a connu, en France, un moment décisif et révélateur : le référendum de 2005 sur le traité constitutionnel européen (TCE). Ce vote, qui a pourtant recueilli près de 55 % de refus, n’a pas produit les effets régulateurs que l’on aurait pu attendre. Deux ans plus tard, son contenu central était repris dans le traité de Lisbonne, adopté par voie parlementaire à Versailles, sans jamais redonner la parole aux citoyens. - -Ce court-circuitage du résultat du référendum n’a pas seulement provoqué un malaise démocratique : il a signalé l’obsolescence d’une arène politique qui prétend encore incarner la souveraineté populaire, tout en s’ajustant aux impératifs d’une régulation supranationale désindexée de tout espace de débat. Depuis, les grandes décisions se prennent largement hors scène, dans des configurations qui échappent aux rituels de la légitimation représentative. L’épisode du TCE fut ainsi moins une exception qu’un révélateur : la souveraineté n’a pas disparu, elle s’est déplacée et s’est muée ; et ce sont les lieux traditionnels de confrontation — qui permettaient de la contester — qui perdent peu à peu de leur puissance. - -Il en résulte aujourd’hui ce que l’on pourrait nommer une vacance des figures politiques. Non pas un vide institutionnel — les appareils demeurent — ni un abandon total du pouvoir — les décisions continuent de tomber — mais un effacement progressif des repères identifiables à travers lesquels ce pouvoir pouvait encore être pensé, nommé, interrogé, disputé ou dénoncé. Ce qui fait défaut, ce ne sont ni les procédures, ni les organigrammes, ni les énoncés de façade, mais les conditions mêmes d’un horizon partagé, d’une épreuve contradictoire et d’une adresse signifiante du pouvoir. - -Les institutions demeurent et fonctionnent. Des lois sont encore votées, des ordonnances promulguées, des discours prononcés dans des formes toujours codifiées. Pourtant, ces énoncés institutionnels, malgré leur constance formelle, peinent à produire de l’attachement, du conflit réglé et du récit commun. Lorsque les grandes directives sont déjà prises ailleurs, et qu’une tutelle s’exerce sur les marges de manœuvre budgétaire et les politiques publiques, tout programme de rupture avec l’existant se trouve d’emblée frappé de discrédit. Il en résulte une tendance à entériner et à traduire en termes juridiques les grands principes issus des institutions européennes. Ainsi, nos partis politiques et nos institutions s’amenuisent et perdent de leur influence : ils peinent à ouvrir des brèches, à franchir des seuils, à générer des événements rassembleurs. Les moments qu’ils produisent surviennent puis s’évanouissent — rarement débattus, rarement disputés. Ils prétendent encore transformer, mais peinent de plus en plus à convaincre. La vie démocratique ne parvient plus à infléchir ledit pouvoir dans une visée d’horizon partagé puisque sa souveraineté se voit entachée. - -Peut-être faut-il alors suspendre un instant le flux de l’analyse pour ouvrir la perspective : entendre ce que cette disparition fait à nos imaginaires. Car perdre les lieux de confrontation, ce n’est pas perdre uniquement un espace politique — c’est voir s’effacer le langage commun de la mise en tension, de l’épreuve contradictoire, du désaccord rendu partageable. En somme, celui-ci n’est pas qu’un cadre, mais aussi une forme sensible, un rythme, un tempo, un théâtre où pouvaient s’exprimer les dissensus, mais aussi se nouer des alliances, des compromis, des co-habitations et des promesses de coexistence. C’est cette mise en forme qui vacille aujourd’hui — et avec elle, notre capacité à rendre visibles les lignes de fracture, les régimes d’attachement, les besoins vitaux et leurs modalités d’arbitrage. - -Depuis lors, les élections se succèdent, mais l’offre programmatique s’uniformise. En France, lors des campagnes présidentielles de 2022, plusieurs observateurs ont noté une quasi-absence de débats contradictoires sur les infrastructures écologiques, la gestion de l’eau, les algorithmes de tri social ou les seuils budgétaires européens — sujets pourtant structurants et centraux. La parole politique reste intense, mais elle survole en ignorant les points réels d’adhérence et de discordance. Elle n’expose ni la texture du monde vécu ni la réalité du tissu productif. Elle ne donne plus à saisir ni la forme ni la scène où les arbitrages s’opèrent. Elle devient commentaire sans impact, phrase choc ou viralité polémique, sans colonne vertébrale permettant de se figurer les problématiques. - -Côté médias, le constat est plus ambivalent, mais tout aussi troublant. D’un côté, l’information est surabondante ; de l’autre, les controverses s’enlisent dans le flux. On discute des intentions, rarement des formats. On spécule sur les effets, sans jamais problématiser les dispositifs. L’émission télévisée « Face à Baba » ou le « Grand Débat national » post-Gilets jaunes en offrent des exemples emblématiques : ils ont suscité de nombreuses prises de parole, tout en ayant peu de prise sur le réel. Il y eut certes des paroles fortes, mais sans véritable structure d’intégration. Il y eut des opinions tranchées, mais sans l’énonciation d’une architecture délibérative. De sorte que la parole a circulé, mais elle n’avait pas autorité à s’instituer. Elle n’était pas dans le bon lieu : le plateau télévisé n’a d’autre vocation que l’audience. - -Même les commissions d’enquête, qui, historiquement, cristallisaient un moment de vérité ou de remaniement, semblent affectées. Le rapport de l’Assemblée nationale sur la gestion de la pandémie de Covid-19, par exemple, a bien été publié en 2022. Il formule des dizaines de propositions. Pourtant, peu d’entre elles ont fait l’objet d’une reprise effective, ni dans la sphère politique, ni dans la sphère médiatique, ni dans la transformation des pratiques administratives. Là encore, la procédure opère — mais sans relais, sans engagement, sans espace de transformation. Même s’il faut le reconnaître, certaines analyses ont néanmoins nourri un débat plus large sur l’état de la santé publique, contribuant à renforcer la vigilance citoyenne sur les infrastructures hospitalières. - -Un autre exemple, plus récent encore, illustre avec une intensité toute particulière ce décalage entre mise en scène délibérative et opérativité réelle : celui de la Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat, initiée en France en 2019 à la suite du mouvement des Gilets Jaunes. Ce dispositif inédit proposait à 150 citoyennes et citoyens, tirés au sort, de formuler des propositions concrètes pour réduire les émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) dans un esprit de justice sociale. La procédure fut longue, exigeante, documentée. Les membres furent encadrés par des scientifiques, des spécialistes, des juristes, des praticiens. Leurs recommandations — 149 au total — furent saluées, y compris par les experts du climat, comme ambitieuses, sérieuses, largement compatibles avec les engagements climatiques de la France. Le président de la République s’était engagé à les transmettre « sans filtre ». - -Et pourtant. À l’issue de la convention, la grande majorité des propositions furent vidées de leur substance, renvoyées en commissions ou transformées jusqu’à l’inverse de leur logique initiale. Certaines furent reprises à la marge dans la loi « Climat et Résilience », d’autres enterrées sans débat, d’autres encore tournées en dérision. L’expression « sans filtre » fut rapidement abandonnée, remplacée par des formules dilatoires. L’instance réflexive a existé, mais elle n’a pas su instituer. La parole a circulé, mais elle n’a pas performé. La procédure, bien que dense, n’a pas permis, là encore, l’instauration d’une architecture de régulation efficiente. - -En ce sens, la Convention n’a pas échoué parce qu’elle était utopique ; elle a échoué parce qu’elle n’a pas trouvé d’ancrage régulateur dans l’architecture politique réelle. Cet exemple montre bien comment un dispositif peut produire de la parole et de la visibilité, sans pour autant parvenir à instituer une régulation opérante. Ce n’est donc pas un lieu de confrontation sans conflit, mais une instance délibérative qui n’a pas donné suite. Et c’est ce type d’effacement — non spectaculaire, mais systémique — qui constitue aujourd’hui le symptôme d’une archéologie du politique désamarrée de ses obligations démocratiques. - -Contrairement au discours du sens commun, qui pointe la responsabilité du chef de l’État, nous pensons que le pouvoir s’est désincarné. Bien que les figures de l’autorité demeurent — titres, fonctions, attributs symboliques —, elles ne cristallisent plus ni contestation structurée, ni reconnaissance affective, ni légitimation opérante. Pendant ce temps, la conflictualité n’a jamais autant submergé le tissu social : désaccords éthiques, désynchronisations temporelles, fractures territoriales, crises multifactorielles, paupérisation systémique, violences symboliques ou physiques. Et, pourtant, cette conflictualité ne trouve plus les lieux où s’exprimer sans exploser. Elle ne se problématise plus dans des dispositifs communs, mais éclate en formes de colère dispersées, parfois illisibles, parfois délégitimées avant même d’avoir trouvé une expression stabilisée. Tel fut le cas du mouvement des Gilets jaunes. - -Et pendant ce temps, les décisions, elles, s’accumulent : fermeture d’un service hospitalier, recentrage budgétaire, ajustement d’un seuil d’éligibilité, réforme à marche forcée du régime des retraites, réforme de l’assurance chômage, redéfinition d’indicateurs d’évaluation du marché de l’emploi, déremboursements médicaux, désindexation d’aide sociale, etc. Ces décisions adviennent sans adresse explicite, sans exposition des arbitrages effectués, sans procès public, sans contradictoire. Elles sont le fruit d’instances spécifiques rendues opaques, qui n’apparaissent pas ou n’assument pas leur fonction politique. Elles opèrent sous couvert de technique, mais agissent comme pouvoir — sans l’assumer publiquement. - -Ainsi, ce n’est pas la capacité d’agir qui fait défaut — les régulations persistent, comme nous le voyons bien —, mais la possibilité de rendre visible ce qui agit. Ce qui tend à s’effacer, ce n’est pas le politique comme mécanisme de régulation, mais le politique comme espace de mise à l’épreuve. Nous habitons un monde saturé de normes, mais privé de figures crédibles de justification. Les arbitrages se multiplient sans explication, sans délibération, sans lieu d’arbitrage démocratiquement établi. - -Et c’est précisément cette disparition d’espaces de controverses et de confrontation — cette disparition des lieux où se mettait en forme le différend, où s’exposait le conflit, où se partageait le sensible — qui constitue une perte capitale. Car c’est par la mise en scène des dissensus que les sociétés humaines ont, pendant des siècles, pu penser ensemble ce qui les liait, les divisait, les orientait. C’est sur cette instance d’épreuve qu’étaient rendues visibles les visions du monde qui s’affrontaient, les justifications qui s’opposaient, les intérêts qui s’exprimaient. Supprimez la scène d’exposition — et ce n’est pas le pouvoir qui disparaît, mais la possibilité d’en débattre. De sorte que la régulation dans les faits ne s’interrompt jamais : c’est la possibilité même qu’elle devienne affaire publique qui s’efface. Quant à l’ordre des choses, il ne se dissout pas, il se mue. Et c’est notre capacité collective à le mettre en cause qui se délite faute de compréhension et de préhension. - -Privés de lieux publics partagés, devenus propriétés privées, nous sommes aussi privés d’une mise en conflit visible et compréhensible. Pourtant, les tensions sont nombreuses, mais elles restent muettes, sans récit commun ni cadre d’expression. Ce qui nous divise cesse d’apparaître clairement. Ce qui nous déchire n’a plus de langage partagé performatif. Ce qui devrait susciter débat et polémique s’efface dans l’indifférence ou se réduit à une simple gestion technique de l’opinion et de la propagande. Le jeu politique ne dispute plus l’ordre du monde, car il ne semble même plus pouvoir le contester ; il en devient seulement le décor figé, répétant sans contradiction les mêmes ritournelles idéologiques. - -Or, sans polémique et sans cadre robuste de pensée, la politique au sens fort ne disparaît pas d’un seul coup, mais elle perd ses conditions d’effectivité, de conflictualité et de reprise. Il y a de la décision, de la gestion, de la réaction, du pilotage. Mais il n’y a plus d’espace où les fins pourraient être débattues, les normes interrogées, les tensions rendues visibles. Ce qui demeure, c’est une sorte de théâtre spectral — où le pouvoir mime encore ses rituels, mais sans adossement, sans prise, sans mise en jeu. Et ce décor fantomatique maintient en vie un imaginaire périmé : celui d’un pouvoir situé, identifiable, contestable. Mais cet imaginaire n’opère plus. Il flotte comme une relique, un fantasme d’époque révolue. C’est du moins ce que nous pensons. - -Ce qui se prépare alors n’est pas une transformation visible des formes politiques, mais une reconfiguration plus discrète de leurs conditions d’effectivité. Ce déplacement appelle un autre langage. Non pas un mot de plus dans une série — mais un geste de pensée qui permette de reconfigurer les coordonnées même à partir desquelles nous pourrions analyser ce qui fait tenir les mondes. Ce changement de condition politique n’est pas une abstraction. Il s’est incarné historiquement, idéologiquement, structurellement. Et l’un de ses vecteurs majeurs — rarement interrogé comme tel — fut le tournant néolibéral du XXᵉ siècle. - -Avec son avènement, ce qui mute, c’est la fabrique même de la régulation. Ce qui s’est déplacé, ce sont les modalités par lesquelles un ordre devient opérant, ajusté, imposable — sans jamais se dire tel. Le néolibéralisme, en ce sens, décompose les conditions mêmes de la conflictualité démocratique. Il n’a pas réduit les règles : il a effacé les lieux de confrontation où l’on pouvait encore les contester. Il a opéré une reconfiguration des coordonnées fondamentales du politique : *qui agit ? selon quelles justifications ? selon quels formats ? Et où peut-on encore l’interroger ?* - -Nous voici donc à l’orée d’un tournant : plus encore qu’un langage politique qui s’épuise, ce sont les gestes mêmes qui permettaient de nommer, de rendre visible, de mettre à l’épreuve les régulations qui se défont. Il nous faut donc changer de focale. Non plus partir des régimes connus, des formes visibles du pouvoir, des catégories héritées, mais remonter au plus près des gestes primitifs qui configurent toute forme de régulation : ce qui fonde, ce qui fait agir, et ce qui articule les deux dans des formes tangibles, contestables, visibles et viables, susceptibles d’éclairer le mouvement évolutif des sociétés. - -Dans notre analyse, le moment néolibéral a précisément perturbé cette articulation. Il a introduit un brouillage entre l’origine du pouvoir et ses effets, entre ce qui autorise et ce qui contraint, entre ce qui se dit et ce qui agit. Et c’est dans ce brouillage que se loge aujourd’hui l’impensé du politique contemporain. - -Pour en sortir, il faut retrouver les gestes fondamentaux à partir desquels un monde collectif peut encore être rendu lisible et vivable. Ce geste, nous le nommons ici : *archéologie de la régulation*. Si l’on veut comprendre ce qui se défait dans les régulations contemporaines — non pas de manière conjoncturelle, mais de façon structurelle —, il est impératif de remonter en amont des formes politiques connues, jusqu’aux forces sémantiques primitives que notre lexique transporte souvent à son insu. - -C’est en reprenant le fil depuis ses origines étymologiques que nous pourrons reconstituer la force d’arrachement de ces termes, les faire parler à nouveau — non comme vestiges, mais comme opérateurs toujours actifs, toujours présents, sous des formes multiples et plurielles. Ce détour par la langue n’est pas un exercice érudit. C’est une tentative de réaccorder le langage à l’expérience vécue, de ressaisir les prises fondamentales du pouvoir à travers leurs gestes constituants et fondateurs. - -Ainsi, les suffixes en *-archie* et en *-cratie*, que nous avons évoqués plus haut comme désignations de régimes, sont bien plus que des marqueurs grammaticaux, ils condensent des opérations fondamentales du politique. Plus précisément, ils signalent deux gestes constitutifs et irréductibles dans toute structuration collective : *celui du fondement* (*arkhè*) *et celui de l’exercice* (*kratos*). Le premier désigne l’*origine légitime* ; le second, la *puissance agissante*. Mais dans leur réduction lexicale, ces deux gestes ont été figés et dissociés en formes de régime, perdant de vue leur fonction dynamique et conjointe dans tout ordre social : *fonder* et *faire agir.* C’est pour restituer leur opérativité conceptuelle que nous introduisons ici les termes d’*arcalité* et de *cratialité*. - -Par arcalité, nous entendons ce qui, dans une configuration donnée, fonctionne comme principe effectif de légitimation d’un ordre, qu’il soit explicite ou tacite, juridique, symbolique, narratif, technique ou calculatoire. Le terme, quitte à nous répéter, est construit à partir de la racine grecque *arkhè* (ἀρχή), qui — comme nous l’avons vu précédemment — désigne dans un même mouvement le commencement, le commandement et le fondement. Ce triple sens — d’origine, de légitimation et d’autorité — est au cœur des opérations symboliques à travers lesquelles les sociétés humaines tentent de rendre leur ordre acceptable, de justifier leurs hiérarchies, de naturaliser leurs choix. - -Il ne s’agit donc pas d’une réalité substantielle, mais d’un acte d’instauration, d’un arc de légitimation, d’un marqueur de crédit : toute *arcalité* est un *geste de production de l’autorité*, qu’elle se fonde sur la révélation divine, sur la tradition des ancêtres, sur la puissance d’un nom de famille, sur la volonté générale, sur les données empiriques, sur des décrets ou des lois, sur l’efficience calculée ou sur la science algorithmique. Ce terme est polysémique dans son usage. - -Dans la pensée grecque ancienne, l’*arkhè* n’était pas une figure du pouvoir, mais un principe d’intelligibilité du cosmos et de la cité. Pour Anaximandre, par exemple, l’*arkhè* est ce qui donne forme et cohérence au monde — ce par quoi tout commence et à quoi tout revient. Chez Aristote, elle devient aussi principe logique, cause première, source de mouvement. Transposée dans l’ordre politique, elle désigne *ce qui autorise un pouvoir à se dire tel, ce à partir de quoi il peut être reconnu, accepté, toléré, voire vénéré*. C’est dans ce sens que *la monarchie* (le pouvoir d’un seul) ou *l’oligarchie* (le pouvoir de quelques-uns) sont fondées sur un principe d’*arkhè*, qu’il s’agisse de droit divin, de naissance, de mérite ou de savoir. Mais une *arcalité* n’est pas forcément une doctrine : elle peut être une forme implicite d’*évidence sociale*, un *consentement tacite intériorisé*. - -Alors pourquoi introduire le mot *arcalité*, au risque du néologisme ? Parce qu’à nos yeux, aucun autre terme ne permet de désigner avec suffisamment de précision, de plasticité et de portée opératoire ce qui constitue le noyau de légitimation des dispositifs de pouvoir. Le mot *autorité* est trop général. *Légitimité* est trop juridique. *Fondement* est trop théologique ou métaphysique. *Source* ou *origine* sont trop historicistes. Or, ce que nous cherchons à nommer, ce n’est pas ce qui est vrai, ni même ce qui est légitime en soi, mais *ce qui fonctionne comme légitimation dans un contexte donné* — ce qui est reconnu, assumé ou subi comme *ce à partir de quoi un pouvoir peut s’exercer* sans être immédiatement remis en cause. - -L’*arcalité* est donc un concept transversal et multiple : elle traverse les époques, les cultures, les régimes — tout en changeant de visage et de figures. Elle peut prendre la forme d’un texte sacré, d’un contrat social, d’une Constitution, d’un mythe fondateur, d’une promesse technoscientifique, ou même d’un jeu d’indicateurs économiques. Elle peut être verticalement imposée ou horizontalement négociée. Elle peut être stabilisée dans le droit ou émerger dans la rue. Mais dans tous les cas, elle opère comme ce qui justifie le pouvoir, ce qui lui donne son aura d’évidence, ce qui naturalise ses opérations en les rendant pensables et acceptables. - -Mais au-delà de ces premières assertions, l’arcalité se présente aussi comme un outil épistémologique pour l’analyse des régimes de légitimation — elle peut servir d’opérateur heuristique pour lire les sociétés dans leurs structures de croyance, de reconnaissance, de justification. Elle permet d’analyser des situations aussi différentes que la réforme d’un système de retraite, le recours à une IA dans la sélection universitaire ou la fondation d’un État théocratique, non pas en fonction de leur contenu normatif, mais en fonction de ce qui est supposé justifier leur existence et de ce qui les autorise à s’imposer. - -Pour commencer à en saisir la portée, il nous faut sommairement déplier l’*arcalité* dans ses déclinaisons historiques et symboliques. Elle ne renvoie pas à un type de régime, mais à *ce qui autorise un pouvoir à s’exercer sans être récusé* : une scène de légitimation, explicite ou tacite. Ainsi, sous l’Ancien Régime, l’autorité du roi n’était pas justifiée par sa compétence, mais par une *sacralité divine incarnée dans le sang, la lignée, le rite* — une *arcalité théologico-politique* où l’*arkhè* se vivait du trône jusqu’à l’autel. - -À Rome, l’*arcalité* pouvait se loger dans le *mos maiorum*, cette mémoire des ancêtres qui n’avait pas besoin de s’écrire pour s’imposer. Elle se transmettait par la répétition des gestes, la reprise des rituels, la reproduction des conduites fondatrices. Plus qu’un corpus de lois codifiées, c’était une continuité opérante, un fil invisible bien que contraignant, qui obligeait chacun non parce qu’un texte le disait, mais parce qu’une *tradition vivante* le réactivait dans chaque pratique. L’autorité se rejouait dans l’acte même, dans la persistance d’un style collectif, plus que dans une règle explicitement énoncée. - -Avec la modernité politique, un autre geste s’invente : l’*arcalité* devient *récit contractuel*. Hobbes, Locke ou Rousseau projettent l’image d’un pacte inaugural entre égaux libres, d’un *contrat social* qui, bien qu’il n’ait jamais été historiquement conclu, institue l’ordre en lui donnant un mythe d’origine. Peu importe que ce contrat soit fictif : il agit comme s’il avait existé, et c’est précisément cette fiction qui fonde la légitimité moderne. L’*arcalité*, désormais, ne s’incarne plus seulement dans la répétition des pratiques, mais dans la *puissance narrative d’un contrat raconté*. - -Aujourd’hui, d’autres *arcalités* se font jour, parfois là où on ne les attend pas. - -Ainsi, dans la *Déclaration des droits de la Pachamama* (Bolivie, 2010), la Terre elle-même est instituée comme *source normative*. La planète, envisagée comme sujet de droit, devient figure d’*arkhè* : principe fondateur d’un ordre politique et juridique qui se justifie par la nature, le vivant et la mémoire écologique. Ici, l’*arcalité* prend la forme d’une *sacralisation de la Terre-mère*, traduite en langage constitutionnel, et ouvre la possibilité d’un autre type de fondement, ni théologique, ni contractuel, mais cosmologique. - -Dans les technostructures contemporaines, comme les agences de notation, les protocoles de régulation algorithmique, ou les plateformes numériques, l’*arcalité* devient *data* : ce sont les chiffres, les indicateurs, les modèles prédictifs qui justifient l’action. L’autorité repose sur la *robustesse du calcul*, la *neutralité supposée du code*, la *précision des seuils*. Ce que Yuval Noah Harari (*Homo deus, une brève histoire du futur*, 2017) appelle le “*dataïsme”* en est une figure actualisée exemplaire, où le flux des données devient source même de vérités. - -Enfin, dans certaines configurations capitalistiques contemporaines, l’*arcalité* prend une forme radicalement *autoréférentielle* : elle ne s’appuie plus sur une extériorité normative, ni même sur une validation juridique ou démocratique, mais sur la seule *performance passée érigée en légitimité présente*. C’est ce que l’on pourrait appeler une *arcalité autogénérative*, où le succès ne demande plus de justification externe — il en révèle sa propre preuve. Une entreprise qui attire des investissements massifs, une plateforme dont la valorisation boursière croît de manière exponentielle, une *startup* qui atteint le statut de “licorne” (plus d’un milliard de dollars de capitalisation), n’a plus besoin de se légitimer par une utilité sociale, une finalité collective ou un adossement institutionnel : *le simple fait d’avoir réussi* suffit à valider l’ensemble des choix stratégiques. Elle s’impose précisément parce qu’elle se donne à voir comme ayant *toujours déjà* fonctionné. - -Mais l’arcalité, dans ses multiples manifestations, si décisive soit-elle, ne suffit pas à faire tenir un monde. Car un ordre social, quel qu’il soit, ne repose jamais uniquement sur les principes qui le légitiment. Il doit aussi pouvoir opérer, agir, décider, trancher, maintenir — parfois même contraindre ou punir. Il ne suffit pas qu’un pouvoir soit justifié ; encore faut-il qu’il se déploie, qu’il prenne forme dans des pratiques, des formats, des opérateurs. En somme, il ne suffit pas qu’un ordre se dise fondé ; il faut encore qu’il s’exerce. - -Il faut pour cela un autre registre, un autre plan de la régulation : celui de l’action. C’est ici qu’intervient ce que nous nommons la *cratialité* — terme forgé comme pour les régimes en -cratie — à partir de *kratos* (κράτος), qui désigne en grec ancien la force, la puissance agissante, la capacité à faire advenir quelque chose dans le réel. Si l’*arcalité est ce qui autorise*, la *cratialité est ce qui opère*. L’une pose les conditions de validité, l’autre produit les effets. L’une fonde, l’autre exerce. - -Par *cratialité*, nous entendons *ce qui agit concrètement dans le tissu des pratiques régulatrices*, ce qui produit des effets sans forcément passer par une scène légitime, visible, ou symboliquement codifiée. C’est la face opératoire du pouvoir, son versant dynamique et actif ; autrement dit : sa *capacité d’effectuation*. Tandis que l’*arcalité* pose, fonde, encadre, la *cratialité* module, infléchit, dévie, ajuste, parfois de manière souterraine, parfois de manière spectaculaire. - -Ce qui justifie l’introduction du néologisme *cratialité*, c’est précisément l’absence, dans le lexique politique courant, d’un mot qui désigne la force agissante sans forme nécessairement instituée, le pouvoir qui s’exerce sans forcément se nommer. Il nous fallait un terme qui capture cette modalité infra-institutionnelle, trans-opérationnelle, souvent désintriquée de toute légitimation formelle, mais dont les effets façonnent les conduites, les agencements et les structures. - -La *cratialité* constitue la *puissance agissante*, la *pulsation régulatrice*, le *versant infra-symbolique*. Elle n’obéit pas à un modèle de souveraineté ou de commandement, mais plutôt à une *logique d’opérativité distribuée*, qui se manifeste dans les actions physiques, mais aussi dans les procédures, les normes implicites, les scripts techniques, les interfaces, les indicateurs, les routines disciplinaires, les ajustements silencieux. - -Mais la *cratialité*, pour autant qu’elle désigne une force agissante sans principe visible, ne saurait être une entité homogène ou univoque. Elle se manifeste toujours sous des formes différenciées, selon les milieux, les dispositifs, les instruments, les régimes d’effet, les temporalités d’action. On aurait tort de l’imaginer comme un pouvoir unifié : elle est plutôt un pluriel sans totalisation, un spectre de pratiques régulatrices qui modulent l’expérience collective à partir d’agencements situés, parfois massifs, parfois microscopiques. - -Pour saisir ce que le concept de *cratialité* permet de penser, il faut l’observer là encore à travers des configurations historiques et contemporaines, où le pouvoir n’agit plus par commandement, mais par *formatage*. La *cratialité* désigne cette *capacité d’un agencement à produire des effets* — non par le droit ou l’autorité, mais par la scénographie, l’attendu, le code, le protocole, la procédure. - -Sous l’Ancien Régime, par exemple, la cour de Versailles fonctionnait moins comme lieu de majesté que comme machinerie de régulation sociale. Le rituel monarchique — lever du roi, étiquette, spatialisation des corps — opérait comme une *cratialité incorporée*. Norbert Elias parlait de *processus de civilisation* ; ici, c’était d’un *pouvoir par intériorisation* qu’il s’agissait : réglage des affects, des gestes, des postures, sans violence apparente, avec une efficacité néanmoins redoutable. - -Dans la Rome républicaine, la *cratialité*, ou puissance politique, s’incarnait dans des procédures précises et des institutions conçues pour éviter la concentration excessive du pouvoir : contre-pouvoirs, délais, rituels et magistratures étaient organisés selon une architecture politique équilibrée. Michel Villey a analysé le droit romain comme un art réaliste où la loi ne s’imposait pas arbitrairement du sommet, mais se construisait dans une pratique juridico-politique orientée vers la justice et adaptée aux circonstances. Cette organisation tempérait un pouvoir centralisé par un jeu complexe d’équilibres, où la règle naissait autant de la tradition et des usages que de l’autorité formelle. - -Avec la modernité étatique, Michel Foucault a montré que le pouvoir se *biopolitise* : santé publique, statistiques, recensement, école obligatoire… la *cratialité* devient une *fabrique de conduites*, agissant en deçà de la loi, modulant les corps et les populations. Dès lors, le pouvoir ne commande plus : il structure la norme à travers des *dispositifs agissants*. - -Dans de nombreux États postcoloniaux, la *cratialité* conserve en grande partie ses *formes héritées* du passé colonial. Cadastres construits selon les normes coloniales, routines bureaucratiques reproduisant les modalités administratives imposées, et scripts institutionnels continuent de réinscrire l’autorité coloniale dans le quotidien, infusant ainsi la gestion étatique d’une mémoire et d’une pratique dominantes. Cette régulation politique et administrative perdure, portée par l’*inertie d’une cratialité enracinée dans les structures héritées*. - -À l’ère écologique, la *cratialité* passe par la *norme chiffrée* : marchés du carbone, seuils ISO, critères ESG. Le droit à polluer se négocie, se calcule, s’échange. Il s’agit moins de régulation morale que d’un *pilotage algorithmique* des équilibres. Bien que la Terre devienne une *arcalité*, sa régulation, elle, repose sur une *cratialité technico-financière*, opaque, désarrimée de tout débat public. - -Enfin, dans les régimes numériques contemporains, la cratialité se dissout dans les infrastructures : IA décisionnelles, scoring social, plateformes automatisées. Comme l’écrit Shoshana Zuboff, nous sommes entrés dans l’ère du capitalisme de surveillance, où la gouvernance s’exerce sans discours et sans voie de recours. Byung-Chul Han y voit un « pouvoir transparent total », où le pouvoir n’est plus énoncé — il agit, module, filtre et exclut. - -Après ce tour d’horizon des *cratialités* à travers l’espace et le temps, s’il fallait justifier, en dernière instance, l’introduction d*e* ce concept, ce serait en raison d’un vide analytique que les cadres existants ne parviennent plus à combler. La question n’est pas tant de créer un terme de plus, que de rendre dicible une opération fondamentale du pouvoir : celle qui consiste à *agir sans autorité explicite*, à contraindre sans justification, à réguler sans discours. En ce sens, la *cratialité* ne s’oppose pas à l’*arcalité*, elles se complètent. Elles révèlent l’une à l’autre leur limite. Car il est possible d’agir sans légitimer, de structurer sans fonder, d’opérer sans lieu de confrontation ni narration instituante. - -Le concept de *cratialité* nous offre le terme pour penser ce pouvoir qui ne se proclame plus, mais qui agit partout — dans les flux, les interfaces, les chaînes logistiques, les scripts numériques, les seuils budgétaires, les routines bureaucratiques. Il désigne la capacité d’un agencement à produire des effets, à modifier des comportements, à orienter des trajectoires, sans s’exposer à la délibération, sans se soumettre à l’explication, sans passer par l’énonciation d’un principe délibéré. C’est ce que Foucault entrevoyait dans la notion de *dispositif*, ce que Deleuze pressentait dans la *modulation*, ce que Simondon entrevoyait dans la *concrétisation technique* — mais qu’aucune de ces notions ne rassemble sous un registre proprement politique, assumant sa fonction régulatrice dans l’espace collectif. - -C’est pourquoi la *cratialité* ne se confond ni avec la domination, ni avec le pouvoir institutionnel, ni même avec la technique. Elle traverse les formes, en tant qu’*opérativité sans fondement*. Elle n’explique pas pourquoi un ordre existe — elle permet de comprendre comment il s’exerce effectivement. Et c’est là sa puissance critique : déloger le politique de ses seules figures visibles, pour révéler les régulations silencieuses, les contraintes discrètes, les mécanismes délégués, les automatisations sans autorité véritablement légitime. Elle ouvre ainsi une contre-archéologie du pouvoir, attentive à ce qui agit sans se dire, à ce qui règle sans apparaître. - -Sur le plan épistémologique, la cratialité permet donc un déplacement décisif : elle nous extrait du dualisme éculé entre légitimité et illégitimité, démocratie et anarchie, État et société civile. Elle invite à penser un entre-deux, un « tiers opératoire » : là où le politique s’institue non par la Loi ou par le Chaos, mais par l’agencement de dispositifs producteurs de réalité. Ce pouvoir-là ne commande pas seulement : il invente, configure, jauge et module. Il ne s’expose pas toujours comme tel : il infiltre les pratiques et s’impose par leurs agencements. Et c’est pourquoi il faut un mot pour le désigner — non pas pour l’isoler, mais pour en cartographier les régimes, les formats, les seuils d’acceptabilité. - -Sur le plan critique, la cratialité permet aussi de distinguer l’effet de l’auteur : ce n’est pas parce que personne ne commande que rien ne s’impose. Ce n’est pas parce qu’une norme n’a pas été votée qu’elle n’opère pas et, inversement, ce n’est pas parce qu’une norme est appliquée qu’elle opère nécessairement. C’est toute la différence entre l’ordre prescrit et l’ordre effectif — différence aujourd’hui cruciale, tant la puissance régulatrice des systèmes dépasse celle des gouvernements. - -Enfin, sur le plan opératoire, la *cratialité* fournit une grille de lecture transversale des phénomènes contemporains : du design d’une application mobile à la réorganisation d’un hôpital, du protocole logistique d’un port à la normalisation de la parole publique, du filtrage des contenus en ligne à la gestion algorithmique de l’emploi. Partout où quelque chose agit sans se dire comme pouvoir, sans se nommer comme décision, sans s’assumer comme contrainte, la *cratialité* est à l’œuvre. - -La *cratialité* ne dit pas ce qui est juste — elle *rend visible ce qui fait effet*. Elle ne produit pas une norme — elle révèle *ce qui règle sans normativité déclarée*. Et c’est à ce titre que le concept de *cratialité* est précieux : parce qu’il nous rend à nouveau capables de penser la régulation là où elle se dissimule, de discuter ce qui semblait inéluctable, de contester ce qui opérait sans discussion. En ce sens, elle ne ferme pas l’espace politique — elle l’ouvre de nouveau, en partant non plus des formes idéales, mais des forces effectives. - -Mais si ces deux pôles — celui du fondement (*arcalité*) et celui de l’opération (*cratialité*) — peuvent être pensés séparément, ils ne fonctionnent jamais isolément dans les mondes réels. C’est là toute la limite d’une lecture en coupe : on peut analyser un principe, décrire une procédure, mais ce qui fait régulation, ce n’est jamais l’un sans l’autre. La légitimation sans effectuation tourne à la mystification ; l’effectuation sans légitimation vire à l’arbitraire. - -Ce cœur du pouvoir régulateur ne se réduit pourtant pas à la simple coprésence du fondement et de l’opération. Il se laisse analyser selon trois dimensions irréductibles : ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui met à l’épreuve. C’est précisément cette troisième dimension — celle par laquelle l’articulation des deux premières devient exposable, disputable et adressable — que nous voulons nommer, penser et problématiser ici. - -Si l’arcalité désigne ce au nom de quoi un ordre se justifie, et la cratialité les chaînes par lesquelles il agit effectivement, alors l’archicration désigne la scène instituée où cette justification et cette effectuation deviennent conjointement exposables à une épreuve. Elle n’est ni un supplément décoratif, ni un simple lieu de parole : elle est la condition sous laquelle le fondement et l’opération peuvent devenir politiquement adressables, disputables et, le cas échéant, révisables. - -L’archicration est la scène dans laquelle se rejoignent la question du pourquoi (pourquoi ce pouvoir est-il reconnu ?) et celle du comment (comment ce pouvoir opère-t-il effectivement ?), lorsque cette rencontre devient exposable, disputable et publiquement opposable. Il ne s’agit pas de deux dimensions juxtaposées, mais de deux régimes dont l’articulation ne devient politiquement décisive qu’à travers une épreuve instituée. - -Ainsi comprise, l’archicration ne nomme pas la totalité de l’acte politique, mais la scène où un ordre se rend à nouveau adressable, en exposant ses fondements et ses opérations à une épreuve réglée. Factuellement, dans les régulations politiques concrètes, il n’y a jamais de pouvoir qui se contente de dire sans faire, ni d’agir sans justifier. Tout dispositif un tant soit peu structurant articule, à sa manière, un *arkhè* *qui justifie* et un *krateîn qui effectue*. - -La force heuristique du concept d’*archicration*, c’est donc de réinscrire dans un même geste ce que la modernité politique avait tendance à dissocier : d’un côté, la légitimation (par le droit, le peuple, Dieu, la science…), de l’autre, l’effectuation (par les lois, les institutions, les techniques, les procédures…). Le pouvoir moderne s’est souvent construit sur une prétention à l’extériorité : l’action devait découler d’un principe, comme si l’on pouvait d’abord fonder, ensuite agir. Cette dissociation était une fiction structurante, utile pour l’ordre symbolique, mais inopérante pour une lecture du réel. - -En vérité, les régulations contemporaines peuvent être relues comme des configurations archicratiques, c’est-à-dire comme des agencements variables d’arcalité, de cratialité et d’archicration. L’État-nation, par exemple, articule une arcalité constitutionnelle à des cratialités institutionnelles, et n’institue des archicrations qu’à travers certaines scènes déterminées — assemblées, tribunaux, procédures de recours, controverses publiques, dispositifs de révision. Même un ordre religieux — ou un régime dit théocratique — n’échappe pas à cette logique : il articule des *arcalités transcendantes* (le texte révélé, la Loi divine, les prophètes, le Messie) à des *cratialités rituelles et doctrinales* (l’interprétation, la sanction, le commandement, la discipline). - -L’archicration ne désigne pas un régime parmi d’autres. Elle nomme la scène instituée où une régulation expose, selon des formes variables — parfois ouvertes, parfois captées, parfois violentes ou asymétriques — l’articulation de ses fondements et de ses opérations à une épreuve réglée, dès lors qu’elle vise à perdurer. De sorte qu’un pouvoir qui échoue à fonder ce qu’il opère s’expose à l’arbitraire ; un pouvoir qui échoue à opérer ce qu’il fonde s’épuise dans l’impuissance. De même, le simulacre surgit quand l’*arcalité* se dissocie de toute effectuation ; l’instabilité s’installe quand la *cratialité* ne s’adosse à aucun principe partagé. Ce que nous appelons archicration, c’est donc la scène instituée où s’articulent — ou se désarticulent — le fondement et l’opération, la forme et la force, la justification et l’exécution, sous la possibilité d’une épreuve réglée. - -Or, c’est lorsque cette articulation devient asymétrique, disjointe ou captée, que le politique mute en profondeur — non plus sous la forme d’un changement visible de régime, mais d’un glissement silencieux des coordonnées de la régulation. Et parmi les figures contemporaines de cette désarticulation archicrative, le moment néolibéral occupe une place stratégique, tant par son étendue historique que par sa profondeur de reconfiguration. Non qu’il ait aboli la régulation — il l’a redéployée. Non qu’il ait supprimé le politique — il l’a déplacé, technicisé, encodé, rendu algorithme. - -À partir des années 1970, dans un contexte de mondialisation, de financiarisation croissante, de désindustrialisation occidentale et de crise des médiations collectives, le néolibéralisme s’est imposé sans conquête déclarée, par glissement, par ruse et par standardisation. Il n’a pas remplacé les institutions du politique : il les a désactivées en douceur ; il n’a pas détruit l’État : il a recodé ses prérogatives régulatrices selon une logique d’efficience, de marché, de seuil, de calcul et de recentrage sur ses fonctions régaliennes. - -Cette mutation ne commence pas avec le néolibéralisme, mais elle y trouve une intensification décisive. - -D’un côté, cette idéologie a déplacé l’*arcalité* : le principe de fondement ne repose plus sur la souveraineté populaire, la loi, ou la délibération publique, mais sur l’*efficience marchande*. Le marché libre est présenté comme naturel, universel, neutre — et se promeut comme seul critère de légitimité. C’est ce que nous appelons ici *arcalité performative* : le fondement est produit par la performance elle-même. Le succès vaut justification. La croissance devient norme. L’indicateur remplace le débat. - -D’un autre côté, elle redéfinit la *cratialité* : la régulation ne passe plus par des institutions politiques visibles, mais par une gouvernance par les normes, les seuils, les indicateurs, les standards, les classements (*rankings*) et les interfaces. La décision n’est plus revendiquée ; elle s’élabore en algorithme opérationnel. Le pouvoir module, ajuste, et encode. Ce que Wendy Brown a appelé, dans *Undoing the Demos*, la “rationalité néolibérale” ne se résume pas à un discours ou à une doctrine — c’est une *cratialité généralisée*, une *logique de fonctionnement incorporée* dans les infrastructures mêmes du quotidien, où toute alternative devient impensable. - -Le mot d’ordre de “dérégulation” prôné par les tenants du néolibéralisme masquait en réalité un déplacement massif de la régulation, et non son annihilation. Ce qui a disparu peu à peu, ce ne sont pas les règles — elles pullulent — mais les scènes d’arbitrage où l’on pouvait encore en contester le sens, la pertinence, les effets. Les espaces publics de reconnaissance où elles pouvaient encore être mises à l’épreuve se sont effacés ou disséminés. Ainsi, chaque réforme — des retraites, de l’assurance chômage, de l’université, de l’hôpital ou de la fiscalité — est dès lors présentée non comme un choix idéologique, mais comme une évidence technico-financière, une réponse dite “rationnelle” à une contrainte supposée incontournable. - -Ce qui s’impose alors est une reconfiguration radicale des conditions d’existence. Le pouvoir n’est ni aboli ni dissimulé : il est redistribué dans des protocoles privés, encodé dans des métriques peu explicites et relayé par des environnements régulateurs où la fabrique du politique a été méthodiquement neutralisée. Ce que le néolibéralisme installe, ce n’est pas une dérégulation au sens strict, mais une désarchicration tendancielle : les opérations se poursuivent, les justifications circulent, tandis que les scènes où elles pourraient être réellement éprouvées sont neutralisées, mimées ou confisquées. Il produit un agencement dans lequel la légitimation ne s’édicte plus, mais s’infiltre sous forme de performance antérieure ; dans lequel la régulation ne tranche plus publiquement, mais opère en souterrain, au travers d’indicateurs, de seuils, d’algorithmes, de traités supranationaux, de conventions de marché. - -Arrêtons-nous un instant pour bien préciser les termes de notre propos. Par scène, nous entendons l’instance d’épreuve où des forces, des acteurs, des registres ou des institutions d’ordres différents se confrontent sous des règles explicites. Il ne s’agit donc pas du seul théâtre institutionnel ; nous parlons ici d’un espace d’apparition conflictuelle, où peuvent se rendre audibles les dissensus (Jacques Rancière, *La Mésentente*, 1995). - -Dès lors, penser l’archicration, c’est chercher à rendre lisible la scène où un ordre se constitue en exposant à l’épreuve réglée l’articulation de forces hétérogènes. Ce que nous proposons ici n’est pas un modèle, mais un geste : un mode d’attention aux lignes d’opération du pouvoir, une manière de cartographier les régulations en acte, une tentative de réouverture d’espaces démocratiques. L’enjeu est de refonder la possibilité d’épreuves là où l’opacité et l’occultation se sont installées, et de rouvrir un espace de visibilité critique là où l’efficacité s’autojustifie et prétend se suffire à elle-même. - -Sous notre prisme d’analyse, l’*archicration* s’éprouve comme une réalité concrète, un espace vivant traversé de tensions permanentes, où se cherche sans cesse un fragile *équilibre entre des formes d’assise, des forces productives et des vulnérabilités constitutives*. Or, cet équilibre n’a rien de garanti : il peut basculer, se rompre, se déformer. - -Que faut-il entendre par là ? Certaines configurations archicratives tendent à surinvestir l’affectation — entendue ici comme l’ensemble des dimensions idéologiques, symboliques et émotionnelles qui prétendent donner sens et légitimer un ordre — tout en négligeant l’effectuation, soit la capacité de traduire ces principes en dispositifs opératoires stables et durables. - -D’autres *archicrations*, à l’inverse, s’enferment dans l’*effectuation* en oubliant tout récit justificatif. L’Union européenne en fournit un cas exemplaire : sa gouvernance repose sur une accumulation de normes techniques, de seuils budgétaires, de critères de convergence, d’indicateurs chiffrés (3 % de déficit, 60 % de dette, pactes de stabilité, règles de concurrence, standards environnementaux…). Ce régime régulateur, d’une efficacité incontestable dans sa capacité à contraindre les États membres, opère par une effectuation puissante, mais trop souvent déliée d’un langage politique partagé. Les décisions se justifient au nom de la « rationalité économique » ou de la « soutenabilité financière », sans se traduire dans un récit de légitimité accessible aux citoyens. C’est cette asymétrie — abondance de dispositifs opératoires, rareté des justifications symboliques — qui alimente le sentiment d’un déficit démocratique chronique, relevé par de nombreux observateurs et confirmé par les épisodes de rejet populaire (référendum français de 2005, Brexit, poussées eurosceptiques). Ici, l’*archicration* s’épuise dans l’opération : elle agit, ajuste, module, mais peine à convaincre et à rassembler. - -À l’autre extrême, certaines *archicrations* se construisent sur une *fausse fusion* entre fondement et opération. Les régimes autoritaires modernes, comme ceux de la Russie de Vladimir Poutine ou de la Turquie de Recep Tayyip Erdogan, en offrent des incarnations saisissantes. L’*arkhè* proclamé — la Nation, la Tradition, la Religion, parfois la Civilisation — est érigé en principe indiscutable, en vérité d’origine inattaquable. Mais cette légitimation abstraite fonctionne comme paravent et sert de couverture à des pratiques de régulation brutales, des répressions ciblées, des ajustements institutionnels opportunistes, des captations oligarchiques et des dispositifs de contrôle opaque. L’illusion d’une concordance parfaite entre fondement et action masque en réalité une dissociation : le fondement est vidé de son contenu normatif, réduit à une invocation rituelle, tandis que l’effectuation se déploie dans la violence, l’arbitraire ou la manipulation technique. Dans ce type de configuration régulatrice à archicration captée, l’absence de véritable contradictoire — presse muselée, opposition criminalisée, société civile réduite — empêche toute mise à l’épreuve du pouvoir. Au lieu d’être travaillé dans une tension féconde, l’équilibre *arcalité/cratialité* est réduit à un simulacre qui absolutise le principe pour mieux immuniser l’action. - -C’est pourquoi penser la régulation politique à travers le prisme de l’*archicration*, ce n’est pas inventer un nouveau régime ni esquisser une utopie institutionnelle. C’est surtout déplacer le regard. Refuser de prendre les formes pour des essences, les régimes pour des totalités closes ou les normes pour des évidences. C’est ouvrir une autre cartographie du pouvoir, fondée non sur les déclarations, mais sur les agencements ; non seulement sur les formes héritées, mais aussi sur les opérations effectives. Une cartographie qui permette d’interroger chaque configuration politique en termes d’articulation concrète entre ce qui justifie (l’*arcalité*) et ce qui agit (la *cratialité*). - -C’est là le cœur du geste archicratique : restituer aux sociétés la lisibilité critique de leurs propres agencements, là où le pouvoir cherche à effacer ses fondements, et sa régulation à se rendre inattaquable. - -Mais allons plus loin. Si l’archicration désigne, dans une régulation, la scène instituée où l’articulation entre arcalité et cratialité devient exposable, différable et opposable, alors l’archicratie nomme le seuil à partir duquel une configuration politique devient habitable parce qu’elle maintient distinctes, articulées et exposables l’arcalité, la cratialité et l’archicration. La gouvernementalité contemporaine, telle que Michel Foucault en a dégagé la logique dans ses cours au Collège de France (*Sécurité, territoire, population*, 1977–1978 ; *Naissance de la biopolitique*, 1978–1979), éclaire au contraire l’un des empêchements majeurs de ce seuil : dissémination technique de l’opération, fragilisation des fondements exposables, compression ou neutralisation des scènes d’épreuve. Ce n’est donc pas l’archicratie que nous voyons proliférer aujourd’hui, mais des formes désarchicratiques, archicratistiques ou autarchicratiques, dans lesquelles la régulation se poursuit tandis que sa mise en scène contradictoire devient de plus en plus difficile, fictive ou captée. - -Cette entrée en matière vise à dégager le lieu exact où se joue aujourd’hui notre impuissance politique. Cette situation n’est pas un déficit de principes ni un excès de pouvoir ; c’est le dérèglement adémocratique des régimes de régulation, rendu illisible faute de scènes délibératives et d’instruments partagés. - -C’est en remontant aux rouages primitifs du pouvoir — l’*arcalité*, polarité des formes d’affectation, et la *cratialité*, polarité des forces d’effectuation — que nous déplaçons la question politique des figures du gouvernement vers les prises différenciées de sa régulation. - -En nommant archicration non pas l’articulation en général entre fondement et opération, mais la scène instituée où cette articulation devient visible, éprouvable et partiellement opposable, nous nous donnons une première grille de lecture des configurations contemporaines, où les dispositifs agissent sans toujours se légitimer, et où les fondements proclamés — droits humains, droits du travail, droits du vivant — voient décroître leur force d’obligation effective, au profit d’agencements opératoires qui ne se légitiment plus qu’à la marge. - -Ce que cette notion permet de mettre au jour ne se limite pas au fonctionnement des régulations, mais concerne aussi les difficultés croissantes à les voir interrogées, éprouvées, exposées au contradictoire. Loin de n’être qu’une propriété secondaire, cette mise à distance de toute possibilité de contestation structurée constitue désormais un trait central de notre condition politique. Ce qui agit n’est plus exposé qu’aux marges de la discussion publique, et ce qui régule s’exerce désormais de plus en plus en silence, dans l’ombre, à l’abri des regards, dans un retrait radical du débat sur ses formes, ses conditions, ses seuils, ses formats. - -Mais ce geste inaugural — critique, archéologique, modélisateur — ne restera légitime et significatif que s’il s’éprouve. Et c’est justement à cette mise à l’épreuve que se consacreront les chapitres à venir. Car le paradigme archicratique n’est pas pur appareillage conceptuel, il est avant tout une méthode de dévoilement, une topologie des régimes régulateurs, un cadre opératoire pour penser la viabilité politique en situation. Il ne cherche pas à ajouter une théorie de plus à celles du pouvoir, mais à rendre discernable, dans toute régulation, ce qui la fonde, ce qui l’opère et ce qui la rend — ou ne la rend plus — exposable à l’épreuve. - -Le chapitre I en établira le socle épistémologique rigoureux, en articulant les trois prises fondamentales du modèle — arcalité, cratialité, archicration — à une grammaire formelle et symbolique, pensée comme modèle falsifiable, susceptible de formalisation et d’interprétation. Il posera la structure tripolaire comme condition d’une intelligibilité systémique, traversable tant par l’histoire que par la technique ou la psychologie collective. - -Le chapitre II délaissera toute abstraction normative pour réinscrire le politique dans la généalogie profonde des régimes de co-viabilité. Il retracera, de manière située et incarnée, les formes empiriques de régulation, depuis les dispositifs totémiques mésolithiques jusqu’aux technorégulations cryptographiques contemporaines. Il tentera de montrer que toute société se constitue d’abord comme régime de *co-viabilité* régulée — dont certaines configurations seulement atteignent un seuil proprement archicratique — bien avant de se penser comme État, comme droit, ou comme nation. - -Le chapitre III, d’inspiration philosophique, viendra tester l’*archicratie* comme outil de relecture des grandes pensées du pouvoir. Plutôt que de les aligner par écoles ou doctrines, il les confrontera à une grille archicratique : *quelle arcalité y opère ? Quelle cratialité s’y manifeste ? Quelle scène d’épreuve, d’opposition, ou de captation y est rendue possible ou empêchée ?* Ce faisant, il opérera un déplacement crucial passant de la justification du pouvoir à la morphologie des régimes de régulation. - -Le chapitre IV, d’orientation techno-historique, incarnera ces tensions dans l’histoire matérielle même de la modernité. Il ne se contentera pas de relire les révolutions industrielles comme des ruptures productives, mais comme des reconfigurations archicratiques profondes. Chaque mutation technique — de la vapeur à l’électricité, du numérique à l’automatisme — a transformé la manière dont un pouvoir se légitime, agit, se distribue ou se dérobe. La technologie, dans sa manifestation même, devient une instance cratiale, et parfois une matrice d’archicration détournée, empêchée ou rendue invisible. C’est donc à une lecture de la régulation des bifurcations industrielles que ce chapitre s’attachera, afin d’en révéler les architectures implicites de pouvoir. - -Enfin, le chapitre V affrontera la conflictualité maximale de notre temps : celle des tensions de co-viabilité. Il abordera, l’une après l’autre, les grandes scènes critiques — économique, écologique, sociale, médiatique, psychique, politique, technologique, géopolitique, cosmopolitique et culturelle — en les traitant non comme objets disciplinaires, mais comme *archicrations* problématiques. Chaque tension y sera relue comme une bifurcation possible : vers une régulation viable, une impasse pathologique ou une captation silencieuse. Ce chapitre constituera le point de bascule, le test ultime du paradigme archicratique : *permet-il de nous aider à discerner, sans dogme, ce qui tient un monde debout — ou le fait vaciller ?* - -Cet essai-thèse convie à une lucidité active : observer l’effectivité du pouvoir, discerner l’articulation du fondement et de l’opération, rouvrir des formes de conflictualité légitime. Il propose une lecture critique et située des régulations qui nous gouvernent. Une manière d’observer ce qui se joue, non dans les proclamations du pouvoir, mais dans ses agencements concrets. Une méthode pour discerner les formes différenciées par lesquelles une société s’ajuste, se tient, ou s’effondre. - -Ce livre a pour unique vocation de fonder le concept d’*archicratie* — articulé par le triptyque *arcalité* / *cratialité* / *archicration* — comme hypothèse heuristique pour lire les situations politiques réelles et situées. Les mentions de détectabilité, d’opérativité ou d’épreuve critique qui apparaissent çà et là n’engagent aucun protocole métrique dans le présent volume : elles signalent de simples repères de lecture et d’éventuelles pistes de recherche ultérieures. L’ouvrage n’édicte pas de méthode d’évaluation, n’agrège pas d’indicateurs, ne promet pas de simulation ; il propose une grammaire conceptuelle pour rendre intelligibles des configurations de pouvoir. - -Penser l’*archicratie*, ce n’est pas restaurer une essence perdue, ni bâtir un système clos. C’est remettre la pensée politique là où elle devient la plus nécessaire : dans les frictions entre ce qui agit et ce qui justifie ; dans les écarts entre ce qui régule et ce qui est vécu ; dans les tensions entre ce qui tient ensemble et ce qui menace de rompre. - -Ce que propose cette entrée en *archicratie*, c’est une autre orientation du regard : vers les conditions d’effectivité du pouvoir, vers les agencements où le fondement et l’opération cessent d’être dissociés, vers les formes nouvelles de conflictualité légitime et de co-viabilité existentielle. - -C’est à ce point précis qu’intervient l’hypothèse de ce livre. Non pour ajouter un terme de plus à la nomenclature déjà saturée des formes de pouvoir, mais pour rendre à nouveau pensable ce qui, dans nos mondes, continue d’ordonner, d’affecter et de tenir sans toujours comparaître. Si les catégories classiques demeurent indispensables, elles ne suffisent plus toujours à décrire les conditions effectives de la régulation. Il faut donc déplacer la question politique elle-même : non plus seulement demander qui gouverne, mais sous quelles formes un monde devient encore habitable, contestable et reprenable. C’est ce déplacement que nous nommons ici archicratie. +Nous vivons une époque saturée de diagnostics sur les formes de +domination, les mutations du pouvoir, les détournements de la +souveraineté. Depuis une vingtaine d'années, les appellations +s'accumulent : *démocratie illibérale*, *ploutocratie*, *happycratie*, +*gouvernement algorithmique*, *démocrature*... À travers ces tentatives +de nommer le désordre du présent, un fait se répète, de manière sourde : +la scène politique semble désorientée. Les catégories héritées — *État*, *pouvoir*, *représentation*, *volonté générale*, *contrat +social* — apparaissent de moins en moins capables de décrire ce qui +nous gouverne effectivement. + +C'est cette perte de prise sur le réel que ce livre souhaite prendre au +sérieux. Non pour lui ajouter un terme de plus au lexique fatigué des +contre-pouvoirs ou des impuissances, mais pour repartir d'un point plus +fondamental, presque en-deçà de la question politique classique. Ce +point, c'est celui de la *tenue d'un monde commun* — c'est-à-dire la +possibilité, pour des êtres dissemblables, vulnérables, inégaux, +traversés de contradictions et situés dans des temporalités hétérogènes, +de coexister sans s'annihiler. + +Il ne s'agit pas, pour autant, de substituer à la théorie politique +classique une clé universelle qui prétendrait tout absorber. Le +déplacement proposé ici a une portée plus précise : rendre plus lisibles +certaines configurations où les catégories héritées — pouvoir, +souveraineté, représentation, gouvernement — décrivent encore des +formes, mais n'éclairent plus suffisamment les conditions effectives de +la régulation. Là où ce déplacement n'apporte aucun gain réel +d'intelligibilité, il doit rester secondaire, voire s'effacer. + +Cette tenue du monde n'équivaut ni à la paix civile, ni à la stabilité +des institutions, ni à l'ordre établi. C'est une difficulté conceptuelle +que d'envisager *la possibilité pour un ordre de durer sans +s'effondrer*, alors même qu'il est traversé en permanence par des forces +et des légitimités qui le travaillent, l'éprouvent, le modifient, +l'usent, le contestent, le prolongent ou le sapent. Cette possibilité de +tenir le monde commun, nous la nommons *co-viabilité*. + +Le terme n'est pas trivial. Il ne désigne ni une simple viabilité +partagée, ni une coexistence pacifiée, ni une durabilité écologique +élargie. Il renvoie à la possibilité, toujours fragile, pour un monde +hétérogène de maintenir une existence viable en travaillant, sans les +abolir, les tensions qui le traversent. + +La *co-viabilité* ne désigne ni un état d'équilibre, ni une finalité +normative. Elle nomme un état dynamique et instable, dans lequel un +ensemble — une société, un système biologique, une formation +historique, un milieu technique ou un monde institué — tient non pas +par homogénéité ou harmonie, mais parce qu'il parvient à réguler ce qui +le menace sans se détruire lui-même. Il compose entre des éléments +hétérogènes — forces d'inertie et d'innovation, attachements profonds +et ruptures nécessaires — sans chercher à les unifier. C'est cette +disposition active, faite de compromis fragiles et d'ajustements +toujours révisables, que nous tenons pour première, et non dérivée. + +Ce déplacement conduit à rehiérarchiser la question politique elle-même. +Nous ne nous limiterons pas à demander qui commande ou qui gouverne, +mais chercherons à comprendre comment un ordre tient malgré ce qui le +travaille, le conteste, l'use ou le défait. La question du commandement +ne disparaît pas ; elle cesse d'être suffisante dès lors que les prises +réelles de la régulation se distribuent dans des agencements, des +temporalités, des médiations et des scènes d'épreuve qui excèdent les +figures classiques du pouvoir. Et surtout nous interrogerons : *Quels +sont les dispositifs qui permettent à une société de ne pas se +désagréger sous l'effet de ses propres contradictions ?* + +Cette bascule de perspective prolonge des intuitions anciennes. Max +Weber (*Économie et société*, 1922) rappelait que ce qui fait tenir un +ordre, ce n'est pas seulement la force ou la loi, mais les « chances de +validité » socialement reconnues. Norbert Elias (*La dynamique de +l'Occident*, 1939/1975) montrait, quant à lui, que les sociétés se +maintiennent par des équilibres toujours précaires entre +interdépendances, rivalités et pacifications. Notre démarche s'inscrit +dans ce sillage : travailler cette interrogation sur les *conditions de +viabilité d'un monde commun*. + +Ce changement de perspective implique une rupture profonde dans la +manière même de poser la question politique. Pendant des siècles, les +sociétés ont pensé le politique à partir de principes transcendants — Dieu, Nature, Volonté générale, Pacte social. Ces principes, supposés +extérieurs aux conflits du présent, garantissaient l'ordre en surplomb. +Comme le rappelle Michel Foucault, il n'y a pas de principe extérieur au +jeu des forces : seulement des rapports de pouvoir situés, modulés, +réversibles. C'est précisément cette exigence — trouver dans les +relations elles-mêmes les ressources nécessaires pour maintenir des +mondes vivables — qui définit notre époque. + +Ce qui émerge, ce ne sont pas de nouveaux principes ni une nouvelle +idéologie, mais une exigence beaucoup plus modeste, et aussi beaucoup +plus difficile à satisfaire : celle de trouver dans les relations +elles-mêmes — entre groupes, entre institutions, entre individus, +entre temporalités — les ressources nécessaires pour maintenir leurs +mondes viables. Autrement dit : c'est *dans* les tensions, *à même* les +conflits, *au sein* des alliances, *au cœur* des désaccords et des +polémiques, que semble se construire la régulation. Non plus +*au-dessus*, par un décret transcendant, mais *au-dedans*, par un +agencement toujours révisable. C'est cela que nous voulons dire — sans +technicité inutile — quand nous parlons d'un déplacement vers une +*instance de régulation située de co-viabilité* : un espace commun où +les forces hétérogènes, souvent antagonistes, peuvent coexister, se +contredire, se confronter, s'éprouver, sans se détruire mutuellement. + +Penser le politique depuis cette approche, c'est renoncer à l'idée même +qu'un ordre puisse se fonder définitivement, une fois pour toutes. C'est +reconnaître que ce qui fait tenir une société n'est jamais un principe +unique, un commandement souverain, une légitimité première, mais *un +espace d'épreuve toujours rejoué* où se négocient, se recadrent, +s'opposent, s'ajustent des forces hétérogènes dont l'accord est +constamment partiel, toujours temporaire, perpétuellement instable. + +Par conséquent, un ordre durerait moins par ses fondements proclamés que +par ses *capacités régulatrices effectives*. Autant dire que ce sont les +dispositifs, les formats, les médiations — parfois massifs, parfois +imperceptibles — par lesquels un ordre parvient à faire coexister ce +qui, en droit, pourrait s'exclure : des intérêts antagonistes, des +affects discordants, des récits historiques incompatibles, des régimes +de valeur irréconciliables, des temporalités sociales déphasées, des +exigences contradictoires en matière de justice, d'efficacité, de +mémoire ou d'avenir. + +Cet ordre ne les efface pas. Il ne les réconcilie pas dans un consensus +fictif. Il ne les fusionne pas dans une synthèse idéologique illusoire. +Il les tient ensemble sans les résoudre, par des équilibres instables, +des arrangements contingents, des formats d'ajustement plus ou moins +durables. C'est là que se situe toute la puissance — et la fragilité — de la régulation : tenir sans annuler, moduler sans effacer, +organiser sans clore. + +Cette capacité régulatrice, si elle échappe aux regards, n'en est pas +moins structurante. Elle repose sur des agencements concrets, souvent +silencieux, mais puissamment opératoires : une réforme budgétaire qui +stabilise un conflit de génération sans le nommer ; un indicateur +économique qui requalifie des arbitrages sociaux sans débat préalable ; +un protocole logistique qui reconfigure la hiérarchie entre producteurs +et distributeurs sans qu'aucune loi ne l'impose. Chaque fois, il y a +régulation sans visibilité, composition sans consensus, opération sans +fondement explicite. + +Il ne faut donc pas s'y tromper : ce que nous décrivons ici ne relève ni +d'un effondrement soudain, ni d'un basculement spectaculaire, mais d'un +déplacement discret — pourtant d'une portée considérable : la +désactivation lente et diffuse des opérateurs classiques de lisibilité +du politique. Ce qui se défait sous nos yeux est une grammaire +d'interprétation, un outillage cognitif collectif, une capacité de mise +en récit. Et ce processus est loin d'être anodin. + +Il y eut un temps — disons moderne — où l'on pouvait encore +localiser les lieux de pouvoir, identifier les détenteurs de l'autorité, +délimiter les instances de délibération, nommer les figures de +légitimation. On pouvait encore croire que la loi émanait d'un espace +visible, que la souveraineté résidait quelque part, que la +représentation engageait effectivement une parole au nom d'un collectif +déterminé. Ce temps — sans avoir disparu totalement — a cessé de +produire des repères fonctionnels. Car si les formes demeurent — constitutions, institutions, procédures, déclarations —, une part +décisive des arbitrages réels s'est déplacée hors de leur emprise. Le +centre de gravité régulateur a migré vers des configurations hors des +prises démocratiques. + +Désormais, ce sont des métriques qui tranchent à la place des normes, +des calculs prédictifs qui se substituent aux débats. Les interfaces +filtrent les droits et les voix sans qu'aucune instance délibérative +n'ait statué sur leurs paramètres. Les arbitrages majeurs — ceux qui +orientent les seuils d'émission de gaz à effet de serre, la sélection +scolaire, les répartitions budgétaires, les politiques de logement, les +trajectoires de migration, ou l'organisation des chaînes +d'approvisionnement mondialisées — ne sont plus discutés +collectivement, mais disséminés dans des protocoles techniques, +financiers, juridiques, algorithmiques, souvent conçus hors scène, et +inaccessibles à toute mise en cause publique. + +Cela ne veut pas dire que le politique ait disparu, mais plutôt qu'il +tend peu à peu à se rendre indiscernable. Il ne s'exerce plus à travers +des figures lisibles, mais à travers des chaînes d'acteurs, des scripts +techniques, des formats d'optimisation, des boucles de retour +automatisées. Cette dissémination ne relève pas d'une abstraction +théorique ou d'un soupçon idéologique : elle se manifeste chaque jour +dans des configurations concrètes, reconnaissables, pourtant rarement +nommées pour ce qu'elles sont. Son efficacité tient précisément à sa +banalité. Car désormais, ce ne sont plus des figures du commandement qui +décident en surplomb, mais des dispositifs encastrés, des logiques de +fonctionnement intégrées à des protocoles d'apparence neutre. + +C'est un marché carbone qui, au nom de seuils agrégés à l'échelle +continentale, conduit à la fermeture d'un site industriel local, sans +qu'aucune figure politique ne puisse rendre visible ni opposable +l'arbitrage opéré. C'est un algorithme de régulation hospitalière qui, +face à une tension budgétaire ou épidémiologique, déprogramme +automatiquement des interventions chirurgicales — sans qu'aucun +médecin, aucun patient, aucun responsable politique ne puisse +véritablement en discuter les critères. C'est une plateforme numérique +de traitement des titres de séjour qui suspend une demande pour +"anomalie de saisie", sans contact humain, sans justification claire, +sans voie de recours instituée. C'est un logiciel de pilotage +budgétaire, adossé à des indicateurs d'efficience, qui impose la +réduction d'une politique sociale sans passage par une arène +délibérative. C'est aussi un score algorithmique de risque bancaire qui +écarte discrètement une famille d'un prêt, bien avant qu'elle ait pu +formuler son projet. + +Contrairement aux apparences, ce qui s'offre au regard n'est plus la +figure massive du pouvoir trônant dans la clarté de ses apparats, mais +la trame patiente d'une régulation en mouvement. Les instances fixes ont +disparu ; la demeure solennelle de l'autorité s'est effacée. Le geste +réel de gouvernance s'insinue dans des protocoles, se glisse dans la +routine, s'entrelace dans les habitudes, se ramifie dans d'innombrables +appareils sans visage. Nul acte inaugural n'en marque ostensiblement la +naissance, nulle proclamation n'en scande les rythmes. On constate +seulement que la régulation avance sans fracas et tisse patiemment la +toile discrète sur laquelle se déplacent nos vies. Ce ne sont plus tant +le décret ou la loi qui pèsent que les enchevêtrements de normes, +l'imperceptible maillage de procédures et l'ajustement continu de +directives flexibles. + +La contrainte n'accable plus par l'ostentation de l'ordre, mais +s'inocule par la subtilité des systèmes. Désormais, l'agencement +d'équilibres, de données et de flux façonne un monde où chacun se trouve +relié, indexé, impliqué dans cette dentelle administrative, sans jamais +croiser le centre, sans jamais savoir nommer celui ou ce qui agit. La +régulation moderne tresse ainsi un univers de seuils mobiles et +d'agencements souples, où l'on ne peut jamais tout à fait fixer le +moment ni le lieu du pouvoir agissant — mais où, à chaque pli de la +vie collective, se lit l'empreinte d'une architecture invisible. + +La difficulté d'y résister tient moins à une violence perceptible qu'à +l'évidence ontologique de ces dispositifs. Ils ne s'avancent pas comme +des autorités, ne se proclament pas comme pouvoir : ils fonctionnent, +nous relient et, ce faisant, opèrent. Et cette opération sans +légitimation démocratique — pouvoir sans figure, contrainte sans +théâtre — rend caduques nos anciennes grilles d'interprétation. +Désormais, ce qui nous affecte le plus ne s'énonce plus ; il s'impose +sans discours jusqu'au plus intime. + +Cela signifie que le politique s'est décousu de ses formes historiques. +Il continue d'agir, de décider, d'orienter — mais sous d'autres +modalités, dans d'autres lieux, avec d'autres instruments, selon des +régimes d'opérativité qu'aucune des catégories anciennes ne parvient +plus à saisir, à rendre intelligible et à traduire sans trahir. + +Autrement dit, nous avons changé d'époque sans encore avoir pu changer +de lexique. Nous continuons de penser avec des formes obsolètes des +processus qui s'activent sous nos yeux et les excèdent de toutes parts. +Nous parlons de gouvernements, là où il faudrait parler de structures de +régulation composite. Nous discutons de lois, là où il faudrait décrire +des protocoles, des seuils, des scénographies d'ajustement, des +mécanismes de *feedback* algorithmique, des normes sans normalisateurs. + +Cette disjonction entre l'expérience vécue de la contrainte et le +vocabulaire disponible pour la dire n'est pas qu'un problème théorique. +Elle produit une désorientation profonde. Elle empêche de penser le +réel, de localiser les responsabilités et rend inopérantes les +critiques. Elle altère la capacité collective à formuler des exigences, +jusqu'à dissoudre les repères et les registres d'action. + +Cette impuissance démocratique généralisée à nommer, situer et orienter +les formes réelles de la régulation se donne parfois à voir dans des +situations d'apparente clarté. L'exemple de la taxe Zucman en fournit +une illustration nette. Le principe est lisible, le diagnostic largement +documenté, l'injustice repérée, l'objet débattu. Et pourtant, +l'effectuation demeure suspendue : pas de dispositif stable, pas +d'instance suffisamment puissante et opposable, pas de scène capable de +convertir l'intelligibilité d'un problème en régulation effective. Ce +cas importe moins ici pour son contenu fiscal propre que pour la +structure qu'il rend visible : une idée peut être reconnue, discutée, +parfois même validée publiquement, sans trouver pour autant la forme +institutionnelle, technique et politique qui permettrait de la porter +jusqu'à l'effectivité. + +Ce hiatus entre l'enjeu perceptible dans l'espace public et le blocage +des régulations effectives constitue l'un des symptômes majeurs du +présent. Il ne renvoie pas seulement à une crise des institutions, mais +à une crise de lisibilité de la régulation elle-même : nous peinons de +plus en plus à nommer ce qui nous oblige, à situer ce qui nous gouverne +et à identifier ce qui continue de structurer nos appartenances. + +À mesure que les instruments du pouvoir deviennent techniques, que les +décisions se diluent dans des protocoles, que les normes se +déterritorialisent dans des scripts ou des seuils, la question de la +régulation glisse en dehors du périmètre politique, comme si elle +n'avait plus de lieu propre, plus d'arène reconnaissable, plus de +langage pour s'énoncer. Le politique ne disparaît pas — il se +désinscrit, il se dissimule dans d'autres formats, il s'internalise dans +les infrastructures, il se pulvérise dans des régularités sans +délibération démocratique. + +Et face à cette évanescence, deux réflexes s'affrontent. L'un, +nostalgique, cherche à réhabiliter les anciennes figures du pouvoir : +l'autorité, la loi, la souveraineté, comme si elles pouvaient encore +réactiver un ordre en désagrégation. L'autre, sceptique, postule qu'il +n'y a plus rien à faire — que nous vivons l'épuisement définitif de +l'arène politique, sa disparition dans le flux, le calcul, le désordre +entropique des systèmes. + +Pour autant, quelque chose continue d'agir, de structurer, de +différencier, même en l'absence de pouvoir identifiable. Ce quelque +chose, c'est la manière dont une société régule ses tensions internes : +non plus en les effaçant, mais en les tenant, en les exposant, en les +configurant dans des dispositifs — visibles ou non — capables de +contenir sans abolir, de moduler sans figer, de différer sans éluder. + +Nous devons donc reprendre à neuf la question la plus enfouie de la +politique : *qu'est-ce qui fait qu'un monde collectif tient ?* Non plus +dans l'abstrait, mais dans la matérialité de ses pratiques, la texture +de ses conflits, l'architecture de ses médiations. *Par quels +agencements tient-il ?* *À travers quelles épreuves ? Selon quelles +temporalités ? Et sous quelles conditions de réversibilité ?* + +Car il ne suffit plus de dire que le pouvoir est diffus, que les normes +sont flexibles, que les algorithmes décident. Encore faut-il comprendre +comment ces formes apparemment dispersées composent — ou échouent à +composer — un monde co-viable, c'est-à-dire capable de réguler sans +brutaliser, de transformer sans dissoudre, d'être robuste et de résister +sans exclure. C'est là, dans cette capacité à organiser la tension sans +basculer dans la clôture ni dans le chaos, que se joue le cœur du +politique contemporain — non plus comme souveraineté, mais comme +scénographie régulatrice. + +Mais cette scénographie, aujourd'hui, est inopérante. Soit elle est +fantomatique — laissée à l'abandon, réduite à un formalisme creux. +Soit elle est confisquée — captée par des dispositifs opaques, des +rationalités techniques, des opérateurs propriétaires fermés. Dans les +deux cas, ce qui est mis en péril, ce n'est pas uniquement l'idée de +démocratie ou le jeu des institutions, mais la possibilité même d'un +monde de confrontation et de controverse, d'un espace commun où la +régulation pourrait être rendue visible, négociable, opposable, +réversible. + +Or ce qui s'efface désormais, c'est la capacité collective à en formuler +les conditions, à en penser les formes, à en situer les nouvelles arènes +de pouvoir. Ce qui s'érode, plus encore qu'une architecture +institutionnelle, c'est notre aptitude à dire ce qui oblige, à +comprendre ce qui ajuste, à situer ce qui contraint. L'étrangeté du +présent ne réside pas dans une hypertrophie du pouvoir — comme on le +répète trop souvent — mais dans un brouillage profond de ses modes +d'existence. Nous ne savons plus vraiment comment le pouvoir s'exerce, +où il opère, par quels instruments il module, ni selon quels critères il +ajuste. Et pourtant, nous continuons de mobiliser les mêmes mots : +*monarchie*, *oligarchie*, *démocratie*, *technocratie*, *bureaucratie*, +*ploutocratie*, *méritocratie*... Comme si ces termes suffisaient encore +à décrire ce qui nous affecte. + +Ces termes politiques s'organisent autour de deux grands suffixes — *-archie* et *-cratie* — forgés dans les débats de la Grèce antique, +et largement sédimentés dans les lexiques modernes. Les suffixes en +-*archie* désignent un *pouvoir fondé sur un principe premier* +(*arkhè*), une origine ou une légitimité verticale : monarchie, +oligarchie, etc. Ceux en -*cratie* désignent plutôt les *modalités +pratiques d'exercice du pouvoir* (*kratos*) : démocratie, technocratie, +bureaucratie, etc. + +Cette distinction entre fondement et exercice, légitimation et +opération, traverse toute la modernité politique. Cependant, cette +séparation ne permet plus aujourd'hui de saisir la réalité des +régulations effectives. Car les scènes d'*arkhè* se sont en grande +partie effondrées sans être remplacées, tandis que les *kratos* +contemporains tendent à s'exercer sans adresse, sans représentation, +sans théâtre. L'on disserte sur les vertus de la démocratie, mais le +*dèmos* n'a plus de lieu de confrontation effective : *serait-ce la rue +? Seraient-ce les réseaux sociaux ? Seraient-ce les médias ? Serait-ce +le Parlement ?* + +Force est de constater qu'aucun de ces espaces n'assure aujourd'hui, à +lui seul, une scène de confrontation effective : la rue est souvent +contenue ou réprimée ; les réseaux sociaux filtrent, segmentent et +compartimentent les prises de parole ; les grands médias sont soumis à +une forte concentration capitalistique ; et le Parlement ne parvient +plus, à lui seul, à représenter ni à articuler l'ensemble de la +conflictualité sociale. + +L'on invoque la République, mais la *res publica* — la chose publique, +appellation la plus vague et la plus creuse que l'on puisse donner de +l'espace politique — se dissout dans des logiques qui échappent à +toute délibération commune : absence de débat, passage en force, +brutalisme institutionnel. + +Quant au langage politique, il continue d'énoncer des structures et des +projets, mais il ne parvient pas à décrire les opérations effectives de +régulation, tant le système socio-économique, en plus de s'être +libéralisé et privatisé, s'est étendu et complexifié tout en confiant +les leviers d'action au niveau supranational. + +C'est précisément cette disjonction — entre les principes supposés +légitimer le pouvoir, et les dispositifs qui en assurent l'effectuation — qui produit aujourd'hui notre impuissance à penser la régulation. +Car aucun de ces termes ne dit où se tiennent les tensions, comment +elles sont traitées, par quelles instances elles sont articulées. Les +-archies contemporaines ne garantissent plus, à elles seules, la dispute +effective de leurs fondements ; et les -craties existantes n'organisent +plus, à elles seules, les conditions suffisantes de leur opposabilité. +Tandis que nous continuons à nommer des formes de régime, les processus +réels de régulation se déplacent vers des configurations où la mise à +l'épreuve devient intermittente, captée, relocalisée ou pratiquement +inaccessible, au point d'échapper à tout espace visible d'épreuve. +Jusqu'à présent, ils opèrent privés de contradictoire, dépourvus de +délai, amputés d'institutions de réversibilité. Autrement dit : nous +sommes gouvernés sans être gouvernés, régulés sans régulation légitimée, +affectés sans instance délibérative. + +Cette dissociation — entre pouvoir nommé et régulation agissante — peut sembler abstraite. Elle ne l'est pas. Un cas devenu emblématique en +offre la preuve saisissante. Entre 2010 et 2011, l'État belge a connu +une situation institutionnelle inédite — près de 540 jours sans +gouvernement fédéral de plein exercice. Aucun exécutif formel, aucun +nouveau mandat, aucune majorité parlementaire opérationnelle. Et +pourtant, rien ne s'est effondré. Les institutions ont continué à +fonctionner. Les services publics ont été assurés. L'économie n'a pas +sombré. La diplomatie s'est poursuivie. Et la société belge a tenu +malgré les tensions communautaires. + +Cet épisode, souvent évoqué sur le ton de l'anecdote, mérite d'être +considéré ici comme un symptôme politique majeur. Il indique que la +régulation ne passe plus nécessairement par la verticalité du pouvoir, +mais par des dispositifs latents, des agencements structurels, des +inerties normatives et des coordinations transversales ou distribuées. +Il montre qu'un ordre peut fonctionner sans fondement renouvelé, tenir +sans pilotage, résister sans commande visible. Pierre Rosanvallon le +soulignait (*La Légitimité démocratique*, 2008), en affirmant que les +sociétés reposent aussi sur des « formes de légitimité latentes », moins +spectaculaires que le vote ou la loi, mais non moins décisives. +L'expérience belge illustre avec force cette persistance d'une +régulation sans gouvernement explicite. Ce phénomène suggère que +l'architecture régulatrice n'est plus identifiable aux lieux habituels +de la souveraineté. + +Pour autant, le pouvoir n'a pas disparu ; il s'exerce désormais depuis +d'autres formes que celles qui le légitimaient. Il s'est délocalisé, +désinstitutionnalisé, déréférencé — tout en continuant à structurer +silencieusement la vie collective. Et c'est dans cet écart grandissant — entre l'absence de gouvernement et la persistance d'une régulation — que se dessine le cœur de la problématique contemporaine : pour +nombre d'entre nous, nous continuons à chercher le pouvoir là où il +n'est plus, et à négliger les régulations implicites là où elles +deviennent de plus en plus décisives. + +Pour que ces dispositifs puissent fonctionner ainsi, discrètement et +efficacement, sans qu'on puisse les identifier ni les contester, il faut +d'abord que les lieux où ils auraient pu être exposés, discutés ou +débattus soient neutralisés, effacés, disqualifiés ou rendus inutiles. +Les lieux de pouvoir s'évaporent progressivement, les moyens +d'expression se désagrègent, et les cadres d'appel à la responsabilité +deviennent inaudibles. L'arène du politique ne disparaît pas +brutalement, elle se désagrège lentement à mesure que ses conditions +d'existence — la mise en scène, la confrontation et la mise à +l'épreuve — se retirent. + +Les anciens espaces d'exposition — Parlement, place publique, journal, +commission, agora, tribune — ne remplissent plus leur fonction +instituante. Non qu'ils aient été abolis : ils subsistent, mais tournent +à vide, pris dans la superposition d'éléments de langage, dans des +logiques oblitératrices, dans l'interruption des moments +d'interpellation et dans l'empêchement des pensées +contre-propositionnelles. Ils parlent sans prise. Ils évoquent sans +effet. Ils promettent sans adossement réel. En somme, ils hypnotisent et +désactivent. Et tandis qu'ils persistent comme formes, les lieux +effectifs de la régulation — là où s'arbitrent réellement les seuils, +s'ajustent véritablement les normes, se décident les niveaux de +tolérance ou d'exclusion — se déplacent hors de la portée de tous. + +Cette désactivation des anciennes scènes de visibilité ne relève pas +d'une abstraction — elle a connu, en France, un moment décisif et +révélateur : le référendum de 2005 sur le traité constitutionnel +européen (TCE). Ce vote, qui a pourtant recueilli près de 55 % de refus, +n'a pas produit les effets régulateurs que l'on aurait pu attendre. Deux +ans plus tard, son contenu central était repris dans le traité de +Lisbonne, adopté par voie parlementaire à Versailles, sans jamais +redonner la parole aux citoyens. + +Ce court-circuitage du résultat du référendum n'a pas seulement provoqué +un malaise démocratique : il a signalé l'obsolescence d'une arène +politique qui prétend encore incarner la souveraineté populaire, tout en +s'ajustant aux impératifs d'une régulation supranationale désindexée de +tout espace de débat. Depuis, les grandes décisions se prennent +largement hors scène, dans des configurations qui échappent aux rituels +de la légitimation représentative. L'épisode du TCE fut ainsi moins une +exception qu'un révélateur : la souveraineté n'a pas disparu, elle s'est +déplacée et s'est muée ; et ce sont les lieux traditionnels de +confrontation — qui permettaient de la contester — qui perdent peu à +peu de leur puissance. + +Il en résulte aujourd'hui ce que l'on pourrait nommer une vacance des +figures politiques. Non pas un vide institutionnel — les appareils +demeurent — ni un abandon total du pouvoir — les décisions +continuent de tomber — mais un effacement progressif des repères +identifiables à travers lesquels ce pouvoir pouvait encore être pensé, +nommé, interrogé, disputé ou dénoncé. Ce qui fait défaut, ce ne sont ni +les procédures, ni les organigrammes, ni les énoncés de façade, mais les +conditions mêmes d'un horizon partagé, d'une épreuve contradictoire et +d'une adresse signifiante du pouvoir. + +Les institutions demeurent et fonctionnent. Des lois sont encore votées, +des ordonnances promulguées, des discours prononcés dans des formes +toujours codifiées. Pourtant, ces énoncés institutionnels, malgré leur +constance formelle, peinent à produire de l'attachement, du conflit +réglé et du récit commun. Lorsque les grandes directives sont déjà +prises ailleurs, et qu'une tutelle s'exerce sur les marges de manœuvre +budgétaire et les politiques publiques, tout programme de rupture avec +l'existant se trouve d'emblée frappé de discrédit. Il en résulte une +tendance à entériner et à traduire en termes juridiques les grands +principes issus des institutions européennes. Ainsi, nos partis +politiques et nos institutions s'amenuisent et perdent de leur influence +: ils peinent à ouvrir des brèches, à franchir des seuils, à générer des +événements rassembleurs. Les moments qu'ils produisent surviennent puis +s'évanouissent — rarement débattus, rarement disputés. Ils prétendent +encore transformer, mais peinent de plus en plus à convaincre. La vie +démocratique ne parvient plus à infléchir ledit pouvoir dans une visée +d'horizon partagé puisque sa souveraineté se voit entachée. + +Peut-être faut-il alors suspendre un instant le flux de l'analyse pour +ouvrir la perspective : entendre ce que cette disparition fait à nos +imaginaires. Car perdre les lieux de confrontation, ce n'est pas perdre +uniquement un espace politique — c'est voir s'effacer le langage +commun de la mise en tension, de l'épreuve contradictoire, du désaccord +rendu partageable. En somme, celui-ci n'est pas qu'un cadre, mais aussi +une forme sensible, un rythme, un tempo, un théâtre où pouvaient +s'exprimer les dissensus, mais aussi se nouer des alliances, des +compromis, des co-habitations et des promesses de coexistence. C'est +cette mise en forme qui vacille aujourd'hui — et avec elle, notre +capacité à rendre visibles les lignes de fracture, les régimes +d'attachement, les besoins vitaux et leurs modalités d'arbitrage. + +Depuis lors, les élections se succèdent, mais l'offre programmatique +s'uniformise. En France, lors des campagnes présidentielles de 2022, +plusieurs observateurs ont noté une quasi-absence de débats +contradictoires sur les infrastructures écologiques, la gestion de +l'eau, les algorithmes de tri social ou les seuils budgétaires européens — sujets pourtant structurants et centraux. La parole politique reste +intense, mais elle survole en ignorant les points réels d'adhérence et +de discordance. Elle n'expose ni la texture du monde vécu ni la réalité +du tissu productif. Elle ne donne plus à saisir ni la forme ni la scène +où les arbitrages s'opèrent. Elle devient commentaire sans impact, +phrase choc ou viralité polémique, sans colonne vertébrale permettant de +se figurer les problématiques. + +Côté médias, le constat est plus ambivalent, mais tout aussi troublant. +D'un côté, l'information est surabondante ; de l'autre, les controverses +s'enlisent dans le flux. On discute des intentions, rarement des +formats. On spécule sur les effets, sans jamais problématiser les +dispositifs. L'émission télévisée « Face à Baba » ou le « Grand Débat +national » post-Gilets jaunes en offrent des exemples emblématiques : +ils ont suscité de nombreuses prises de parole, tout en ayant peu de +prise sur le réel. Il y eut certes des paroles fortes, mais sans +véritable structure d'intégration. Il y eut des opinions tranchées, mais +sans l'énonciation d'une architecture délibérative. De sorte que la +parole a circulé, mais elle n'avait pas autorité à s'instituer. Elle +n'était pas dans le bon lieu : le plateau télévisé n'a d'autre vocation +que l'audience. + +Même les commissions d'enquête, qui, historiquement, cristallisaient un +moment de vérité ou de remaniement, semblent affectées. Le rapport de +l'Assemblée nationale sur la gestion de la pandémie de Covid-19, par +exemple, a bien été publié en 2022. Il formule des dizaines de +propositions. Pourtant, peu d'entre elles ont fait l'objet d'une reprise +effective, ni dans la sphère politique, ni dans la sphère médiatique, ni +dans la transformation des pratiques administratives. Là encore, la +procédure opère — mais sans relais, sans engagement, sans espace de +transformation. Même s'il faut le reconnaître, certaines analyses ont +néanmoins nourri un débat plus large sur l'état de la santé publique, +contribuant à renforcer la vigilance citoyenne sur les infrastructures +hospitalières. + +Un autre exemple, plus récent encore, illustre avec une intensité toute +particulière ce décalage entre mise en scène délibérative et opérativité +réelle : celui de la Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat, initiée en +France en 2019 à la suite du mouvement des Gilets Jaunes. Ce dispositif +inédit proposait à 150 citoyennes et citoyens, tirés au sort, de +formuler des propositions concrètes pour réduire les émissions de gaz à +effet de serre (GES) dans un esprit de justice sociale. La procédure fut +longue, exigeante, documentée. Les membres furent encadrés par des +scientifiques, des spécialistes, des juristes, des praticiens. Leurs +recommandations — 149 au total — furent saluées, y compris par les +experts du climat, comme ambitieuses, sérieuses, largement compatibles +avec les engagements climatiques de la France. Le président de la +République s'était engagé à les transmettre « sans filtre ». + +Et pourtant. À l'issue de la convention, la grande majorité des +propositions furent vidées de leur substance, renvoyées en commissions +ou transformées jusqu'à l'inverse de leur logique initiale. Certaines +furent reprises à la marge dans la loi « Climat et Résilience », +d'autres enterrées sans débat, d'autres encore tournées en dérision. +L'expression « sans filtre » fut rapidement abandonnée, remplacée par +des formules dilatoires. L'instance réflexive a existé, mais elle n'a +pas su instituer. La parole a circulé, mais elle n'a pas performé. La +procédure, bien que dense, n'a pas permis, là encore, l'instauration +d'une architecture de régulation efficiente. + +En ce sens, la Convention n'a pas échoué parce qu'elle était utopique ; +elle a échoué parce qu'elle n'a pas trouvé d'ancrage régulateur dans +l'architecture politique réelle. Cet exemple montre bien comment un +dispositif peut produire de la parole et de la visibilité, sans pour +autant parvenir à instituer une régulation opérante. Ce n'est donc pas +un lieu de confrontation sans conflit, mais une instance délibérative +qui n'a pas donné suite. Et c'est ce type d'effacement — non +spectaculaire, mais systémique — qui constitue aujourd'hui le symptôme +d'une archéologie du politique désamarrée de ses obligations +démocratiques. + +Contrairement au discours du sens commun, qui pointe la responsabilité +du chef de l'État, nous pensons que le pouvoir s'est désincarné. Bien +que les figures de l'autorité demeurent — titres, fonctions, attributs +symboliques —, elles ne cristallisent plus ni contestation structurée, +ni reconnaissance affective, ni légitimation opérante. Pendant ce temps, +la conflictualité n'a jamais autant submergé le tissu social : +désaccords éthiques, désynchronisations temporelles, fractures +territoriales, crises multifactorielles, paupérisation systémique, +violences symboliques ou physiques. Et, pourtant, cette conflictualité +ne trouve plus les lieux où s'exprimer sans exploser. Elle ne se +problématise plus dans des dispositifs communs, mais éclate en formes de +colère dispersées, parfois illisibles, parfois délégitimées avant même +d'avoir trouvé une expression stabilisée. Tel fut le cas du mouvement +des Gilets jaunes. + +Et pendant ce temps, les décisions, elles, s'accumulent : fermeture d'un +service hospitalier, recentrage budgétaire, ajustement d'un seuil +d'éligibilité, réforme à marche forcée du régime des retraites, réforme +de l'assurance chômage, redéfinition d'indicateurs d'évaluation du +marché de l'emploi, déremboursements médicaux, désindexation d'aide +sociale, etc. Ces décisions adviennent sans adresse explicite, sans +exposition des arbitrages effectués, sans procès public, sans +contradictoire. Elles sont le fruit d'instances spécifiques rendues +opaques, qui n'apparaissent pas ou n'assument pas leur fonction +politique. Elles opèrent sous couvert de technique, mais agissent comme +pouvoir — sans l'assumer publiquement. + +Ainsi, ce n'est pas la capacité d'agir qui fait défaut — les +régulations persistent, comme nous le voyons bien —, mais la +possibilité de rendre visible ce qui agit. Ce qui tend à s'effacer, ce +n'est pas le politique comme mécanisme de régulation, mais le politique +comme espace de mise à l'épreuve. Nous habitons un monde saturé de +normes, mais privé de figures crédibles de justification. Les arbitrages +se multiplient sans explication, sans délibération, sans lieu +d'arbitrage démocratiquement établi. + +Et c'est précisément cette disparition d'espaces de controverses et de +confrontation — cette disparition des lieux où se mettait en forme le +différend, où s'exposait le conflit, où se partageait le sensible — qui constitue une perte capitale. Car c'est par la mise en scène des +dissensus que les sociétés humaines ont, pendant des siècles, pu penser +ensemble ce qui les liait, les divisait, les orientait. C'est sur cette +instance d'épreuve qu'étaient rendues visibles les visions du monde qui +s'affrontaient, les justifications qui s'opposaient, les intérêts qui +s'exprimaient. Supprimez la scène d'exposition — et ce n'est pas le +pouvoir qui disparaît, mais la possibilité d'en débattre. De sorte que +la régulation dans les faits ne s'interrompt jamais : c'est la +possibilité même qu'elle devienne affaire publique qui s'efface. Quant à +l'ordre des choses, il ne se dissout pas, il se mue. Et c'est notre +capacité collective à le mettre en cause qui se délite faute de +compréhension et de préhension. + +Privés de lieux publics partagés, devenus propriétés privées, nous +sommes aussi privés d'une mise en conflit visible et compréhensible. +Pourtant, les tensions sont nombreuses, mais elles restent muettes, sans +récit commun ni cadre d'expression. Ce qui nous divise cesse +d'apparaître clairement. Ce qui nous déchire n'a plus de langage partagé +performatif. Ce qui devrait susciter débat et polémique s'efface dans +l'indifférence ou se réduit à une simple gestion technique de l'opinion +et de la propagande. Le jeu politique ne dispute plus l'ordre du monde, +car il ne semble même plus pouvoir le contester ; il en devient +seulement le décor figé, répétant sans contradiction les mêmes +ritournelles idéologiques. + +Or, sans polémique et sans cadre robuste de pensée, la politique au sens +fort ne disparaît pas d'un seul coup, mais elle perd ses conditions +d'effectivité, de conflictualité et de reprise. Il y a de la décision, +de la gestion, de la réaction, du pilotage. Mais il n'y a plus d'espace +où les fins pourraient être débattues, les normes interrogées, les +tensions rendues visibles. Ce qui demeure, c'est une sorte de théâtre +spectral — où le pouvoir mime encore ses rituels, mais sans +adossement, sans prise, sans mise en jeu. Et ce décor fantomatique +maintient en vie un imaginaire périmé : celui d'un pouvoir situé, +identifiable, contestable. Mais cet imaginaire n'opère plus. Il flotte +comme une relique, un fantasme d'époque révolue. C'est du moins ce que +nous pensons. + +Ce qui se prépare alors n'est pas une transformation visible des formes +politiques, mais une reconfiguration plus discrète de leurs conditions +d'effectivité. Ce déplacement appelle un autre langage. Non pas un mot +de plus dans une série — mais un geste de pensée qui permette de +reconfigurer les coordonnées même à partir desquelles nous pourrions +analyser ce qui fait tenir les mondes. Ce changement de condition +politique n'est pas une abstraction. Il s'est incarné historiquement, +idéologiquement, structurellement. Et l'un de ses vecteurs majeurs — rarement interrogé comme tel — fut le tournant néolibéral du XXᵉ +siècle. + +Avec son avènement, ce qui mute, c'est la fabrique même de la +régulation. Ce qui s'est déplacé, ce sont les modalités par lesquelles +un ordre devient opérant, ajusté, imposable — sans jamais se dire tel. +Le néolibéralisme, en ce sens, décompose les conditions mêmes de la +conflictualité démocratique. Il n'a pas réduit les règles : il a effacé +les lieux de confrontation où l'on pouvait encore les contester. Il a +opéré une reconfiguration des coordonnées fondamentales du politique : +*qui agit ? selon quelles justifications ? selon quels formats ? Et où +peut-on encore l'interroger ?* + +Nous voici donc à l'orée d'un tournant : plus encore qu'un langage +politique qui s'épuise, ce sont les gestes mêmes qui permettaient de +nommer, de rendre visible, de mettre à l'épreuve les régulations qui se +défont. Il nous faut donc changer de focale. Non plus partir des régimes +connus, des formes visibles du pouvoir, des catégories héritées, mais +remonter au plus près des gestes primitifs qui configurent toute forme +de régulation : ce qui fonde, ce qui fait agir, et ce qui articule les +deux dans des formes tangibles, contestables, visibles et viables, +susceptibles d'éclairer le mouvement évolutif des sociétés. + +Dans notre analyse, le moment néolibéral a précisément perturbé cette +articulation. Il a introduit un brouillage entre l'origine du pouvoir et +ses effets, entre ce qui autorise et ce qui contraint, entre ce qui se +dit et ce qui agit. Et c'est dans ce brouillage que se loge aujourd'hui +l'impensé du politique contemporain. + +Pour en sortir, il faut retrouver les gestes fondamentaux à partir +desquels un monde collectif peut encore être rendu lisible et vivable. +Ce geste, nous le nommons ici : *archéologie de la régulation*. Si l'on +veut comprendre ce qui se défait dans les régulations contemporaines — non pas de manière conjoncturelle, mais de façon structurelle —, il +est impératif de remonter en amont des formes politiques connues, +jusqu'aux forces sémantiques primitives que notre lexique transporte +souvent à son insu. + +C'est en reprenant le fil depuis ses origines étymologiques que nous +pourrons reconstituer la force d'arrachement de ces termes, les faire +parler à nouveau — non comme vestiges, mais comme opérateurs toujours +actifs, toujours présents, sous des formes multiples et plurielles. Ce +détour par la langue n'est pas un exercice érudit. C'est une tentative +de réaccorder le langage à l'expérience vécue, de ressaisir les prises +fondamentales du pouvoir à travers leurs gestes constituants et +fondateurs. + +Ainsi, les suffixes en *-archie* et en *-cratie*, que nous avons évoqués +plus haut comme désignations de régimes, sont bien plus que des +marqueurs grammaticaux, ils condensent des opérations fondamentales du +politique. Plus précisément, ils signalent deux gestes constitutifs et +irréductibles dans toute structuration collective : *celui du fondement* +(*arkhè*) *et celui de l'exercice* (*kratos*). Le premier désigne +l'*origine légitime* ; le second, la *puissance agissante*. Mais dans +leur réduction lexicale, ces deux gestes ont été figés et dissociés en +formes de régime, perdant de vue leur fonction dynamique et conjointe +dans tout ordre social : *fonder* et *faire agir.* C'est pour restituer +leur opérativité conceptuelle que nous introduisons ici les termes +d'*arcalité* et de *cratialité*. + +Par arcalité, nous entendons ce qui, dans une configuration donnée, +fonctionne comme principe effectif de légitimation d'un ordre, qu'il +soit explicite ou tacite, juridique, symbolique, narratif, technique ou +calculatoire. Le terme, quitte à nous répéter, est construit à partir de +la racine grecque *arkhè* (ἀρχή), qui — comme nous l'avons vu +précédemment — désigne dans un même mouvement le commencement, le +commandement et le fondement. Ce triple sens — d'origine, de +légitimation et d'autorité — est au cœur des opérations symboliques à +travers lesquelles les sociétés humaines tentent de rendre leur ordre +acceptable, de justifier leurs hiérarchies, de naturaliser leurs choix. + +Il ne s'agit donc pas d'une réalité substantielle, mais d'un acte +d'instauration, d'un arc de légitimation, d'un marqueur de crédit : +toute *arcalité* est un *geste de production de l'autorité*, qu'elle se +fonde sur la révélation divine, sur la tradition des ancêtres, sur la +puissance d'un nom de famille, sur la volonté générale, sur les données +empiriques, sur des décrets ou des lois, sur l'efficience calculée ou +sur la science algorithmique. Ce terme est polysémique dans son usage. + +Dans la pensée grecque ancienne, l'*arkhè* n'était pas une figure du +pouvoir, mais un principe d'intelligibilité du cosmos et de la cité. +Pour Anaximandre, par exemple, l'*arkhè* est ce qui donne forme et +cohérence au monde — ce par quoi tout commence et à quoi tout revient. +Chez Aristote, elle devient aussi principe logique, cause première, +source de mouvement. Transposée dans l'ordre politique, elle désigne *ce +qui autorise un pouvoir à se dire tel, ce à partir de quoi il peut être +reconnu, accepté, toléré, voire vénéré*. C'est dans ce sens que *la +monarchie* (le pouvoir d'un seul) ou *l'oligarchie* (le pouvoir de +quelques-uns) sont fondées sur un principe d'*arkhè*, qu'il s'agisse de +droit divin, de naissance, de mérite ou de savoir. Mais une *arcalité* +n'est pas forcément une doctrine : elle peut être une forme implicite +d'*évidence sociale*, un *consentement tacite intériorisé*. + +Alors pourquoi introduire le mot *arcalité*, au risque du néologisme ? +Parce qu'à nos yeux, aucun autre terme ne permet de désigner avec +suffisamment de précision, de plasticité et de portée opératoire ce qui +constitue le noyau de légitimation des dispositifs de pouvoir. Le mot +*autorité* est trop général. *Légitimité* est trop juridique. +*Fondement* est trop théologique ou métaphysique. *Source* ou *origine* +sont trop historicistes. Or, ce que nous cherchons à nommer, ce n'est +pas ce qui est vrai, ni même ce qui est légitime en soi, mais *ce qui +fonctionne comme légitimation dans un contexte donné* — ce qui est +reconnu, assumé ou subi comme *ce à partir de quoi un pouvoir peut +s'exercer* sans être immédiatement remis en cause. + +L'*arcalité* est donc un concept transversal et multiple : elle traverse +les époques, les cultures, les régimes — tout en changeant de visage +et de figures. Elle peut prendre la forme d'un texte sacré, d'un contrat +social, d'une Constitution, d'un mythe fondateur, d'une promesse +technoscientifique, ou même d'un jeu d'indicateurs économiques. Elle +peut être verticalement imposée ou horizontalement négociée. Elle peut +être stabilisée dans le droit ou émerger dans la rue. Mais dans tous les +cas, elle opère comme ce qui justifie le pouvoir, ce qui lui donne son +aura d'évidence, ce qui naturalise ses opérations en les rendant +pensables et acceptables. + +Mais au-delà de ces premières assertions, l'arcalité se présente aussi +comme un outil épistémologique pour l'analyse des régimes de +légitimation — elle peut servir d'opérateur heuristique pour lire les +sociétés dans leurs structures de croyance, de reconnaissance, de +justification. Elle permet d'analyser des situations aussi différentes +que la réforme d'un système de retraite, le recours à une IA dans la +sélection universitaire ou la fondation d'un État théocratique, non pas +en fonction de leur contenu normatif, mais en fonction de ce qui est +supposé justifier leur existence et de ce qui les autorise à s'imposer. + +Pour commencer à en saisir la portée, il nous faut sommairement déplier +l'*arcalité* dans ses déclinaisons historiques et symboliques. Elle ne +renvoie pas à un type de régime, mais à *ce qui autorise un pouvoir à +s'exercer sans être récusé* : une scène de légitimation, explicite ou +tacite. Ainsi, sous l'Ancien Régime, l'autorité du roi n'était pas +justifiée par sa compétence, mais par une *sacralité divine incarnée +dans le sang, la lignée, le rite* — une *arcalité +théologico-politique* où l'*arkhè* se vivait du trône jusqu'à l'autel. + +À Rome, l'*arcalité* pouvait se loger dans le *mos maiorum*, cette +mémoire des ancêtres qui n'avait pas besoin de s'écrire pour s'imposer. +Elle se transmettait par la répétition des gestes, la reprise des +rituels, la reproduction des conduites fondatrices. Plus qu'un corpus de +lois codifiées, c'était une continuité opérante, un fil invisible bien +que contraignant, qui obligeait chacun non parce qu'un texte le disait, +mais parce qu'une *tradition vivante* le réactivait dans chaque +pratique. L'autorité se rejouait dans l'acte même, dans la persistance +d'un style collectif, plus que dans une règle explicitement énoncée. + +Avec la modernité politique, un autre geste s'invente : l'*arcalité* +devient *récit contractuel*. Hobbes, Locke ou Rousseau projettent +l'image d'un pacte inaugural entre égaux libres, d'un *contrat social* +qui, bien qu'il n'ait jamais été historiquement conclu, institue l'ordre +en lui donnant un mythe d'origine. Peu importe que ce contrat soit +fictif : il agit comme s'il avait existé, et c'est précisément cette +fiction qui fonde la légitimité moderne. L'*arcalité*, désormais, ne +s'incarne plus seulement dans la répétition des pratiques, mais dans la +*puissance narrative d'un contrat raconté*. + +Aujourd'hui, d'autres *arcalités* se font jour, parfois là où on ne les +attend pas. + +Ainsi, dans la *Déclaration des droits de la Pachamama* (Bolivie, 2010), +la Terre elle-même est instituée comme *source normative*. La planète, +envisagée comme sujet de droit, devient figure d'*arkhè* : principe +fondateur d'un ordre politique et juridique qui se justifie par la +nature, le vivant et la mémoire écologique. Ici, l'*arcalité* prend la +forme d'une *sacralisation de la Terre-mère*, traduite en langage +constitutionnel, et ouvre la possibilité d'un autre type de fondement, +ni théologique, ni contractuel, mais cosmologique. + +Dans les technostructures contemporaines, comme les agences de notation, +les protocoles de régulation algorithmique, ou les plateformes +numériques, l'*arcalité* devient *data* : ce sont les chiffres, les +indicateurs, les modèles prédictifs qui justifient l'action. L'autorité +repose sur la *robustesse du calcul*, la *neutralité supposée du code*, +la *précision des seuils*. Ce que Yuval Noah Harari (*Homo deus, une +brève histoire du futur*, 2017) appelle le "*dataïsme"* en est une +figure actualisée exemplaire, où le flux des données devient source même +de vérités. + +Enfin, dans certaines configurations capitalistiques contemporaines, +l'*arcalité* prend une forme radicalement *autoréférentielle* : elle ne +s'appuie plus sur une extériorité normative, ni même sur une validation +juridique ou démocratique, mais sur la seule *performance passée érigée +en légitimité présente*. C'est ce que l'on pourrait appeler une +*arcalité autogénérative*, où le succès ne demande plus de justification +externe — il en révèle sa propre preuve. Une entreprise qui attire des +investissements massifs, une plateforme dont la valorisation boursière +croît de manière exponentielle, une *startup* qui atteint le statut de +"licorne" (plus d'un milliard de dollars de capitalisation), n'a plus +besoin de se légitimer par une utilité sociale, une finalité collective +ou un adossement institutionnel : *le simple fait d'avoir réussi* suffit +à valider l'ensemble des choix stratégiques. Elle s'impose précisément +parce qu'elle se donne à voir comme ayant *toujours déjà* fonctionné. + +Mais l'arcalité, dans ses multiples manifestations, si décisive +soit-elle, ne suffit pas à faire tenir un monde. Car un ordre social, +quel qu'il soit, ne repose jamais uniquement sur les principes qui le +légitiment. Il doit aussi pouvoir opérer, agir, décider, trancher, +maintenir — parfois même contraindre ou punir. Il ne suffit pas qu'un +pouvoir soit justifié ; encore faut-il qu'il se déploie, qu'il prenne +forme dans des pratiques, des formats, des opérateurs. En somme, il ne +suffit pas qu'un ordre se dise fondé ; il faut encore qu'il s'exerce. + +Il faut pour cela un autre registre, un autre plan de la régulation : +celui de l'action. C'est ici qu'intervient ce que nous nommons la +*cratialité* — terme forgé comme pour les régimes en -cratie — à +partir de *kratos* (κράτος), qui désigne en grec ancien la force, la +puissance agissante, la capacité à faire advenir quelque chose dans le +réel. Si l'*arcalité est ce qui autorise*, la *cratialité est ce qui +opère*. L'une pose les conditions de validité, l'autre produit les +effets. L'une fonde, l'autre exerce. + +Par *cratialité*, nous entendons *ce qui agit concrètement dans le tissu +des pratiques régulatrices*, ce qui produit des effets sans forcément +passer par une scène légitime, visible, ou symboliquement codifiée. +C'est la face opératoire du pouvoir, son versant dynamique et actif ; +autrement dit : sa *capacité d'effectuation*. Tandis que l'*arcalité* +pose, fonde, encadre, la *cratialité* module, infléchit, dévie, ajuste, +parfois de manière souterraine, parfois de manière spectaculaire. + +Ce qui justifie l'introduction du néologisme *cratialité*, c'est +précisément l'absence, dans le lexique politique courant, d'un mot qui +désigne la force agissante sans forme nécessairement instituée, le +pouvoir qui s'exerce sans forcément se nommer. Il nous fallait un terme +qui capture cette modalité infra-institutionnelle, trans-opérationnelle, +souvent désintriquée de toute légitimation formelle, mais dont les +effets façonnent les conduites, les agencements et les structures. + +La *cratialité* constitue la *puissance agissante*, la *pulsation +régulatrice*, le *versant infra-symbolique*. Elle n'obéit pas à un +modèle de souveraineté ou de commandement, mais plutôt à une *logique +d'opérativité distribuée*, qui se manifeste dans les actions physiques, +mais aussi dans les procédures, les normes implicites, les scripts +techniques, les interfaces, les indicateurs, les routines +disciplinaires, les ajustements silencieux. + +Mais la *cratialité*, pour autant qu'elle désigne une force agissante +sans principe visible, ne saurait être une entité homogène ou univoque. +Elle se manifeste toujours sous des formes différenciées, selon les +milieux, les dispositifs, les instruments, les régimes d'effet, les +temporalités d'action. On aurait tort de l'imaginer comme un pouvoir +unifié : elle est plutôt un pluriel sans totalisation, un spectre de +pratiques régulatrices qui modulent l'expérience collective à partir +d'agencements situés, parfois massifs, parfois microscopiques. + +Pour saisir ce que le concept de *cratialité* permet de penser, il faut +l'observer là encore à travers des configurations historiques et +contemporaines, où le pouvoir n'agit plus par commandement, mais par +*formatage*. La *cratialité* désigne cette *capacité d'un agencement à +produire des effets* — non par le droit ou l'autorité, mais par la +scénographie, l'attendu, le code, le protocole, la procédure. + +Sous l'Ancien Régime, par exemple, la cour de Versailles fonctionnait +moins comme lieu de majesté que comme machinerie de régulation sociale. +Le rituel monarchique — lever du roi, étiquette, spatialisation des +corps — opérait comme une *cratialité incorporée*. Norbert Elias +parlait de *processus de civilisation* ; ici, c'était d'un *pouvoir par +intériorisation* qu'il s'agissait : réglage des affects, des gestes, des +postures, sans violence apparente, avec une efficacité néanmoins +redoutable. + +Dans la Rome républicaine, la *cratialité*, ou puissance politique, +s'incarnait dans des procédures précises et des institutions conçues +pour éviter la concentration excessive du pouvoir : contre-pouvoirs, +délais, rituels et magistratures étaient organisés selon une +architecture politique équilibrée. Michel Villey a analysé le droit +romain comme un art réaliste où la loi ne s'imposait pas arbitrairement +du sommet, mais se construisait dans une pratique juridico-politique +orientée vers la justice et adaptée aux circonstances. Cette +organisation tempérait un pouvoir centralisé par un jeu complexe +d'équilibres, où la règle naissait autant de la tradition et des usages +que de l'autorité formelle. + +Avec la modernité étatique, Michel Foucault a montré que le pouvoir se +*biopolitise* : santé publique, statistiques, recensement, école +obligatoire... la *cratialité* devient une *fabrique de conduites*, +agissant en deçà de la loi, modulant les corps et les populations. Dès +lors, le pouvoir ne commande plus : il structure la norme à travers des +*dispositifs agissants*. + +Dans de nombreux États postcoloniaux, la *cratialité* conserve en grande +partie ses *formes héritées* du passé colonial. Cadastres construits +selon les normes coloniales, routines bureaucratiques reproduisant les +modalités administratives imposées, et scripts institutionnels +continuent de réinscrire l'autorité coloniale dans le quotidien, +infusant ainsi la gestion étatique d'une mémoire et d'une pratique +dominantes. Cette régulation politique et administrative perdure, portée +par l'*inertie d'une cratialité enracinée dans les structures héritées*. + +À l'ère écologique, la *cratialité* passe par la *norme chiffrée* : +marchés du carbone, seuils ISO, critères ESG. Le droit à polluer se +négocie, se calcule, s'échange. Il s'agit moins de régulation morale que +d'un *pilotage algorithmique* des équilibres. Bien que la Terre devienne +une *arcalité*, sa régulation, elle, repose sur une *cratialité +technico-financière*, opaque, désarrimée de tout débat public. + +Enfin, dans les régimes numériques contemporains, la cratialité se +dissout dans les infrastructures : IA décisionnelles, scoring social, +plateformes automatisées. Comme l'écrit Shoshana Zuboff, nous sommes +entrés dans l'ère du capitalisme de surveillance, où la gouvernance +s'exerce sans discours et sans voie de recours. Byung-Chul Han y voit un +« pouvoir transparent total », où le pouvoir n'est plus énoncé — il +agit, module, filtre et exclut. + +Après ce tour d'horizon des *cratialités* à travers l'espace et le +temps, s'il fallait justifier, en dernière instance, l'introduction d*e* +ce concept, ce serait en raison d'un vide analytique que les cadres +existants ne parviennent plus à combler. La question n'est pas tant de +créer un terme de plus, que de rendre dicible une opération fondamentale +du pouvoir : celle qui consiste à *agir sans autorité explicite*, à +contraindre sans justification, à réguler sans discours. En ce sens, la +*cratialité* ne s'oppose pas à l'*arcalité*, elles se complètent. Elles +révèlent l'une à l'autre leur limite. Car il est possible d'agir sans +légitimer, de structurer sans fonder, d'opérer sans lieu de +confrontation ni narration instituante. + +Le concept de *cratialité* nous offre le terme pour penser ce pouvoir +qui ne se proclame plus, mais qui agit partout — dans les flux, les +interfaces, les chaînes logistiques, les scripts numériques, les seuils +budgétaires, les routines bureaucratiques. Il désigne la capacité d'un +agencement à produire des effets, à modifier des comportements, à +orienter des trajectoires, sans s'exposer à la délibération, sans se +soumettre à l'explication, sans passer par l'énonciation d'un principe +délibéré. C'est ce que Foucault entrevoyait dans la notion de +*dispositif*, ce que Deleuze pressentait dans la *modulation*, ce que +Simondon entrevoyait dans la *concrétisation technique* — mais +qu'aucune de ces notions ne rassemble sous un registre proprement +politique, assumant sa fonction régulatrice dans l'espace collectif. + +C'est pourquoi la *cratialité* ne se confond ni avec la domination, ni +avec le pouvoir institutionnel, ni même avec la technique. Elle traverse +les formes, en tant qu'*opérativité sans fondement*. Elle n'explique pas +pourquoi un ordre existe — elle permet de comprendre comment il +s'exerce effectivement. Et c'est là sa puissance critique : déloger le +politique de ses seules figures visibles, pour révéler les régulations +silencieuses, les contraintes discrètes, les mécanismes délégués, les +automatisations sans autorité véritablement légitime. Elle ouvre ainsi +une contre-archéologie du pouvoir, attentive à ce qui agit sans se dire, +à ce qui règle sans apparaître. + +Sur le plan épistémologique, la cratialité permet donc un déplacement +décisif : elle nous extrait du dualisme éculé entre légitimité et +illégitimité, démocratie et anarchie, État et société civile. Elle +invite à penser un entre-deux, un « tiers opératoire » : là où le +politique s'institue non par la Loi ou par le Chaos, mais par +l'agencement de dispositifs producteurs de réalité. Ce pouvoir-là ne +commande pas seulement : il invente, configure, jauge et module. Il ne +s'expose pas toujours comme tel : il infiltre les pratiques et s'impose +par leurs agencements. Et c'est pourquoi il faut un mot pour le désigner — non pas pour l'isoler, mais pour en cartographier les régimes, les +formats, les seuils d'acceptabilité. + +Sur le plan critique, la cratialité permet aussi de distinguer l'effet +de l'auteur : ce n'est pas parce que personne ne commande que rien ne +s'impose. Ce n'est pas parce qu'une norme n'a pas été votée qu'elle +n'opère pas et, inversement, ce n'est pas parce qu'une norme est +appliquée qu'elle opère nécessairement. C'est toute la différence entre +l'ordre prescrit et l'ordre effectif — différence aujourd'hui +cruciale, tant la puissance régulatrice des systèmes dépasse celle des +gouvernements. + +Enfin, sur le plan opératoire, la *cratialité* fournit une grille de +lecture transversale des phénomènes contemporains : du design d'une +application mobile à la réorganisation d'un hôpital, du protocole +logistique d'un port à la normalisation de la parole publique, du +filtrage des contenus en ligne à la gestion algorithmique de l'emploi. +Partout où quelque chose agit sans se dire comme pouvoir, sans se nommer +comme décision, sans s'assumer comme contrainte, la *cratialité* est à +l'œuvre. + +La *cratialité* ne dit pas ce qui est juste — elle *rend visible ce +qui fait effet*. Elle ne produit pas une norme — elle révèle *ce qui +règle sans normativité déclarée*. Et c'est à ce titre que le concept de +*cratialité* est précieux : parce qu'il nous rend à nouveau capables de +penser la régulation là où elle se dissimule, de discuter ce qui +semblait inéluctable, de contester ce qui opérait sans discussion. En ce +sens, elle ne ferme pas l'espace politique — elle l'ouvre de nouveau, +en partant non plus des formes idéales, mais des forces effectives. + +Mais si ces deux pôles — celui du fondement (*arcalité*) et celui de +l'opération (*cratialité*) — peuvent être pensés séparément, ils ne +fonctionnent jamais isolément dans les mondes réels. C'est là toute la +limite d'une lecture en coupe : on peut analyser un principe, décrire +une procédure, mais ce qui fait régulation, ce n'est jamais l'un sans +l'autre. La légitimation sans effectuation tourne à la mystification ; +l'effectuation sans légitimation vire à l'arbitraire. + +Ce cœur du pouvoir régulateur ne se réduit pourtant pas à la simple +coprésence du fondement et de l'opération. Il se laisse analyser selon +trois dimensions irréductibles : ce qui fonde, ce qui opère et ce qui +met à l'épreuve. C'est précisément cette troisième dimension — celle +par laquelle l'articulation des deux premières devient exposable, +disputable et adressable — que nous voulons nommer, penser et +problématiser ici. + +Si l'arcalité désigne ce au nom de quoi un ordre se justifie, et la +cratialité les chaînes par lesquelles il agit effectivement, alors +l'archicration désigne la scène instituée où cette justification et +cette effectuation deviennent conjointement exposables à une épreuve. +Elle n'est ni un supplément décoratif, ni un simple lieu de parole : +elle est la condition sous laquelle le fondement et l'opération peuvent +devenir politiquement adressables, disputables et, le cas échéant, +révisables. + +L'archicration est la scène dans laquelle se rejoignent la question du +pourquoi (pourquoi ce pouvoir est-il reconnu ?) et celle du comment +(comment ce pouvoir opère-t-il effectivement ?), lorsque cette rencontre +devient exposable, disputable et publiquement opposable. Il ne s'agit +pas de deux dimensions juxtaposées, mais de deux régimes dont +l'articulation ne devient politiquement décisive qu'à travers une +épreuve instituée. + +Ainsi comprise, l'archicration ne nomme pas la totalité de l'acte +politique, mais la scène où un ordre se rend à nouveau adressable, en +exposant ses fondements et ses opérations à une épreuve réglée. +Factuellement, dans les régulations politiques concrètes, il n'y a +jamais de pouvoir qui se contente de dire sans faire, ni d'agir sans +justifier. Tout dispositif un tant soit peu structurant articule, à sa +manière, un *arkhè* *qui justifie* et un *krateîn qui effectue*. + +La force heuristique du concept d'*archicration*, c'est donc de +réinscrire dans un même geste ce que la modernité politique avait +tendance à dissocier : d'un côté, la légitimation (par le droit, le +peuple, Dieu, la science...), de l'autre, l'effectuation (par les lois, +les institutions, les techniques, les procédures...). Le pouvoir moderne +s'est souvent construit sur une prétention à l'extériorité : l'action +devait découler d'un principe, comme si l'on pouvait d'abord fonder, +ensuite agir. Cette dissociation était une fiction structurante, utile +pour l'ordre symbolique, mais inopérante pour une lecture du réel. + +En vérité, les régulations contemporaines peuvent être relues comme des +configurations archicratiques, c'est-à-dire comme des agencements +variables d'arcalité, de cratialité et d'archicration. L'État-nation, +par exemple, articule une arcalité constitutionnelle à des cratialités +institutionnelles, et n'institue des archicrations qu'à travers +certaines scènes déterminées — assemblées, tribunaux, procédures de +recours, controverses publiques, dispositifs de révision. Même un ordre +religieux — ou un régime dit théocratique — n'échappe pas à cette +logique : il articule des *arcalités transcendantes* (le texte révélé, +la Loi divine, les prophètes, le Messie) à des *cratialités rituelles et +doctrinales* (l'interprétation, la sanction, le commandement, la +discipline). + +L'archicration ne désigne pas un régime parmi d'autres. Elle nomme la +scène instituée où une régulation expose, selon des formes variables — parfois ouvertes, parfois captées, parfois violentes ou asymétriques — l'articulation de ses fondements et de ses opérations à une épreuve +réglée, dès lors qu'elle vise à perdurer. De sorte qu'un pouvoir qui +échoue à fonder ce qu'il opère s'expose à l'arbitraire ; un pouvoir qui +échoue à opérer ce qu'il fonde s'épuise dans l'impuissance. De même, le +simulacre surgit quand l'*arcalité* se dissocie de toute effectuation ; +l'instabilité s'installe quand la *cratialité* ne s'adosse à aucun +principe partagé. Ce que nous appelons archicration, c'est donc la scène +instituée où s'articulent — ou se désarticulent — le fondement et +l'opération, la forme et la force, la justification et l'exécution, sous +la possibilité d'une épreuve réglée. + +Or, c'est lorsque cette articulation devient asymétrique, disjointe ou +captée, que le politique mute en profondeur — non plus sous la forme +d'un changement visible de régime, mais d'un glissement silencieux des +coordonnées de la régulation. Et parmi les figures contemporaines de +cette désarticulation archicrative, le moment néolibéral occupe une +place stratégique, tant par son étendue historique que par sa profondeur +de reconfiguration. Non qu'il ait aboli la régulation — il l'a +redéployée. Non qu'il ait supprimé le politique — il l'a déplacé, +technicisé, encodé, rendu algorithme. + +À partir des années 1970, dans un contexte de mondialisation, de +financiarisation croissante, de désindustrialisation occidentale et de +crise des médiations collectives, le néolibéralisme s'est imposé sans +conquête déclarée, par glissement, par ruse et par standardisation. Il +n'a pas remplacé les institutions du politique : il les a désactivées en +douceur ; il n'a pas détruit l'État : il a recodé ses prérogatives +régulatrices selon une logique d'efficience, de marché, de seuil, de +calcul et de recentrage sur ses fonctions régaliennes. + +Cette mutation ne commence pas avec le néolibéralisme, mais elle y +trouve une intensification décisive. + +D'un côté, cette idéologie a déplacé l'*arcalité* : le principe de +fondement ne repose plus sur la souveraineté populaire, la loi, ou la +délibération publique, mais sur l'*efficience marchande*. Le marché +libre est présenté comme naturel, universel, neutre — et se promeut +comme seul critère de légitimité. C'est ce que nous appelons ici +*arcalité performative* : le fondement est produit par la performance +elle-même. Le succès vaut justification. La croissance devient norme. +L'indicateur remplace le débat. + +D'un autre côté, elle redéfinit la *cratialité* : la régulation ne passe +plus par des institutions politiques visibles, mais par une gouvernance +par les normes, les seuils, les indicateurs, les standards, les +classements (*rankings*) et les interfaces. La décision n'est plus +revendiquée ; elle s'élabore en algorithme opérationnel. Le pouvoir +module, ajuste, et encode. Ce que Wendy Brown a appelé, dans *Undoing +the Demos*, la "rationalité néolibérale" ne se résume pas à un discours +ou à une doctrine — c'est une *cratialité généralisée*, une *logique +de fonctionnement incorporée* dans les infrastructures mêmes du +quotidien, où toute alternative devient impensable. + +Le mot d'ordre de "dérégulation" prôné par les tenants du néolibéralisme +masquait en réalité un déplacement massif de la régulation, et non son +annihilation. Ce qui a disparu peu à peu, ce ne sont pas les règles — elles pullulent — mais les scènes d'arbitrage où l'on pouvait encore +en contester le sens, la pertinence, les effets. Les espaces publics de +reconnaissance où elles pouvaient encore être mises à l'épreuve se sont +effacés ou disséminés. Ainsi, chaque réforme — des retraites, de +l'assurance chômage, de l'université, de l'hôpital ou de la fiscalité — est dès lors présentée non comme un choix idéologique, mais comme +une évidence technico-financière, une réponse dite "rationnelle" à une +contrainte supposée incontournable. + +Ce qui s'impose alors est une reconfiguration radicale des conditions +d'existence. Le pouvoir n'est ni aboli ni dissimulé : il est redistribué +dans des protocoles privés, encodé dans des métriques peu explicites et +relayé par des environnements régulateurs où la fabrique du politique a +été méthodiquement neutralisée. Ce que le néolibéralisme installe, ce +n'est pas une dérégulation au sens strict, mais une désarchicration +tendancielle : les opérations se poursuivent, les justifications +circulent, tandis que les scènes où elles pourraient être réellement +éprouvées sont neutralisées, mimées ou confisquées. Il produit un +agencement dans lequel la légitimation ne s'édicte plus, mais s'infiltre +sous forme de performance antérieure ; dans lequel la régulation ne +tranche plus publiquement, mais opère en souterrain, au travers +d'indicateurs, de seuils, d'algorithmes, de traités supranationaux, de +conventions de marché. + +Arrêtons-nous un instant pour bien préciser les termes de notre propos. +Par scène, nous entendons l'instance d'épreuve où des forces, des +acteurs, des registres ou des institutions d'ordres différents se +confrontent sous des règles explicites. Il ne s'agit donc pas du seul +théâtre institutionnel ; nous parlons ici d'un espace d'apparition +conflictuelle, où peuvent se rendre audibles les dissensus (Jacques +Rancière, *La Mésentente*, 1995). + +Dès lors, penser l'archicration, c'est chercher à rendre lisible la +scène où un ordre se constitue en exposant à l'épreuve réglée +l'articulation de forces hétérogènes. Ce que nous proposons ici n'est +pas un modèle, mais un geste : un mode d'attention aux lignes +d'opération du pouvoir, une manière de cartographier les régulations en +acte, une tentative de réouverture d'espaces démocratiques. L'enjeu est +de refonder la possibilité d'épreuves là où l'opacité et l'occultation +se sont installées, et de rouvrir un espace de visibilité critique là où +l'efficacité s'autojustifie et prétend se suffire à elle-même. + +Sous notre prisme d'analyse, l'*archicration* s'éprouve comme une +réalité concrète, un espace vivant traversé de tensions permanentes, où +se cherche sans cesse un fragile *équilibre entre des formes d'assise, +des forces productives et des vulnérabilités constitutives*. Or, cet +équilibre n'a rien de garanti : il peut basculer, se rompre, se +déformer. + +Que faut-il entendre par là ? Certaines configurations archicratives +tendent à surinvestir l'affectation — entendue ici comme l'ensemble +des dimensions idéologiques, symboliques et émotionnelles qui prétendent +donner sens et légitimer un ordre — tout en négligeant l'effectuation, +soit la capacité de traduire ces principes en dispositifs opératoires +stables et durables. + +D'autres *archicrations*, à l'inverse, s'enferment dans l'*effectuation* +en oubliant tout récit justificatif. L'Union européenne en fournit un +cas exemplaire : sa gouvernance repose sur une accumulation de normes +techniques, de seuils budgétaires, de critères de convergence, +d'indicateurs chiffrés (3 % de déficit, 60 % de dette, pactes de +stabilité, règles de concurrence, standards environnementaux...). Ce +régime régulateur, d'une efficacité incontestable dans sa capacité à +contraindre les États membres, opère par une effectuation puissante, +mais trop souvent déliée d'un langage politique partagé. Les décisions +se justifient au nom de la « rationalité économique » ou de la « +soutenabilité financière », sans se traduire dans un récit de légitimité +accessible aux citoyens. C'est cette asymétrie — abondance de +dispositifs opératoires, rareté des justifications symboliques — qui +alimente le sentiment d'un déficit démocratique chronique, relevé par de +nombreux observateurs et confirmé par les épisodes de rejet populaire +(référendum français de 2005, Brexit, poussées eurosceptiques). Ici, +l'*archicration* s'épuise dans l'opération : elle agit, ajuste, module, +mais peine à convaincre et à rassembler. + +À l'autre extrême, certaines *archicrations* se construisent sur une +*fausse fusion* entre fondement et opération. Les régimes autoritaires +modernes, comme ceux de la Russie de Vladimir Poutine ou de la Turquie +de Recep Tayyip Erdogan, en offrent des incarnations saisissantes. +L'*arkhè* proclamé — la Nation, la Tradition, la Religion, parfois la +Civilisation — est érigé en principe indiscutable, en vérité d'origine +inattaquable. Mais cette légitimation abstraite fonctionne comme +paravent et sert de couverture à des pratiques de régulation brutales, +des répressions ciblées, des ajustements institutionnels opportunistes, +des captations oligarchiques et des dispositifs de contrôle opaque. +L'illusion d'une concordance parfaite entre fondement et action masque +en réalité une dissociation : le fondement est vidé de son contenu +normatif, réduit à une invocation rituelle, tandis que l'effectuation se +déploie dans la violence, l'arbitraire ou la manipulation technique. +Dans ce type de configuration régulatrice à archicration captée, +l'absence de véritable contradictoire — presse muselée, opposition +criminalisée, société civile réduite — empêche toute mise à l'épreuve +du pouvoir. Au lieu d'être travaillé dans une tension féconde, +l'équilibre *arcalité/cratialité* est réduit à un simulacre qui +absolutise le principe pour mieux immuniser l'action. + +C'est pourquoi penser la régulation politique à travers le prisme de +l'*archicration*, ce n'est pas inventer un nouveau régime ni esquisser +une utopie institutionnelle. C'est surtout déplacer le regard. Refuser +de prendre les formes pour des essences, les régimes pour des totalités +closes ou les normes pour des évidences. C'est ouvrir une autre +cartographie du pouvoir, fondée non sur les déclarations, mais sur les +agencements ; non seulement sur les formes héritées, mais aussi sur les +opérations effectives. Une cartographie qui permette d'interroger chaque +configuration politique en termes d'articulation concrète entre ce qui +justifie (l'*arcalité*) et ce qui agit (la *cratialité*). + +C'est là le cœur du geste archicratique : restituer aux sociétés la +lisibilité critique de leurs propres agencements, là où le pouvoir +cherche à effacer ses fondements, et sa régulation à se rendre +inattaquable. + +Mais allons plus loin. Si l'archicration désigne, dans une régulation, +la scène instituée où l'articulation entre arcalité et cratialité +devient exposable, différable et opposable, alors l'archicratie nomme le +seuil à partir duquel une configuration politique devient habitable +parce qu'elle maintient distinctes, articulées et exposables l'arcalité, +la cratialité et l'archicration. La gouvernementalité contemporaine, +telle que Michel Foucault en a dégagé la logique dans ses cours au +Collège de France (*Sécurité, territoire, population*, 1977–1978 ; +*Naissance de la biopolitique*, 1978–1979), éclaire au contraire l'un +des empêchements majeurs de ce seuil : dissémination technique de +l'opération, fragilisation des fondements exposables, compression ou +neutralisation des scènes d'épreuve. Ce n'est donc pas l'archicratie que +nous voyons proliférer aujourd'hui, mais des formes désarchicratiques, +archicratistiques ou autarchicratiques, dans lesquelles la régulation se +poursuit tandis que sa mise en scène contradictoire devient de plus en +plus difficile, fictive ou captée. + +Cette entrée en matière vise à dégager le lieu exact où se joue +aujourd'hui notre impuissance politique. Cette situation n'est pas un +déficit de principes ni un excès de pouvoir ; c'est le dérèglement +adémocratique des régimes de régulation, rendu illisible faute de scènes +délibératives et d'instruments partagés. + +C'est en remontant aux rouages primitifs du pouvoir — l'*arcalité*, +polarité des formes d'affectation, et la *cratialité*, polarité des +forces d'effectuation — que nous déplaçons la question politique des +figures du gouvernement vers les prises différenciées de sa régulation. + +En nommant archicration non pas l'articulation en général entre +fondement et opération, mais la scène instituée où cette articulation +devient visible, éprouvable et partiellement opposable, nous nous +donnons une première grille de lecture des configurations +contemporaines, où les dispositifs agissent sans toujours se légitimer, +et où les fondements proclamés — droits humains, droits du travail, +droits du vivant — voient décroître leur force d'obligation effective, +au profit d'agencements opératoires qui ne se légitiment plus qu'à la +marge. + +Ce que cette notion permet de mettre au jour ne se limite pas au +fonctionnement des régulations, mais concerne aussi les difficultés +croissantes à les voir interrogées, éprouvées, exposées au +contradictoire. Loin de n'être qu'une propriété secondaire, cette mise à +distance de toute possibilité de contestation structurée constitue +désormais un trait central de notre condition politique. Ce qui agit +n'est plus exposé qu'aux marges de la discussion publique, et ce qui +régule s'exerce désormais de plus en plus en silence, dans l'ombre, à +l'abri des regards, dans un retrait radical du débat sur ses formes, ses +conditions, ses seuils, ses formats. + +Mais ce geste inaugural — critique, archéologique, modélisateur — ne +restera légitime et significatif que s'il s'éprouve. Et c'est justement +à cette mise à l'épreuve que se consacreront les chapitres à venir. Car +le paradigme archicratique n'est pas pur appareillage conceptuel, il est +avant tout une méthode de dévoilement, une topologie des régimes +régulateurs, un cadre opératoire pour penser la viabilité politique en +situation. Il ne cherche pas à ajouter une théorie de plus à celles du +pouvoir, mais à rendre discernable, dans toute régulation, ce qui la +fonde, ce qui l'opère et ce qui la rend — ou ne la rend plus — exposable à l'épreuve. + +Le chapitre I en établira le socle épistémologique rigoureux, en +articulant les trois prises fondamentales du modèle — arcalité, +cratialité, archicration — à une grammaire formelle et symbolique, +pensée comme modèle falsifiable, susceptible de formalisation et +d'interprétation. Il posera la structure tripolaire comme condition +d'une intelligibilité systémique, traversable tant par l'histoire que +par la technique ou la psychologie collective. + +Le chapitre II délaissera toute abstraction normative pour réinscrire le +politique dans la généalogie profonde des régimes de co-viabilité. Il +retracera, de manière située et incarnée, les formes empiriques de +régulation, depuis les dispositifs totémiques mésolithiques jusqu'aux +technorégulations cryptographiques contemporaines. Il tentera de montrer +que toute société se constitue d'abord comme régime de *co-viabilité* +régulée — dont certaines configurations seulement atteignent un seuil +proprement archicratique — bien avant de se penser comme État, comme +droit, ou comme nation. + +Le chapitre III, d'inspiration philosophique, viendra tester +l'*archicratie* comme outil de relecture des grandes pensées du pouvoir. +Plutôt que de les aligner par écoles ou doctrines, il les confrontera à +une grille archicratique : *quelle arcalité y opère ? Quelle cratialité +s'y manifeste ? Quelle scène d'épreuve, d'opposition, ou de captation y +est rendue possible ou empêchée ?* Ce faisant, il opérera un déplacement +crucial passant de la justification du pouvoir à la morphologie des +régimes de régulation. + +Le chapitre IV, d'orientation techno-historique, incarnera ces tensions +dans l'histoire matérielle même de la modernité. Il ne se contentera pas +de relire les révolutions industrielles comme des ruptures productives, +mais comme des reconfigurations archicratiques profondes. Chaque +mutation technique — de la vapeur à l'électricité, du numérique à +l'automatisme — a transformé la manière dont un pouvoir se légitime, +agit, se distribue ou se dérobe. La technologie, dans sa manifestation +même, devient une instance cratiale, et parfois une matrice +d'archicration détournée, empêchée ou rendue invisible. C'est donc à une +lecture de la régulation des bifurcations industrielles que ce chapitre +s'attachera, afin d'en révéler les architectures implicites de pouvoir. + +Enfin, le chapitre V affrontera la conflictualité maximale de notre +temps : celle des tensions de co-viabilité. Il abordera, l'une après +l'autre, les grandes scènes critiques — économique, écologique, +sociale, médiatique, psychique, politique, technologique, géopolitique, +cosmopolitique et culturelle — en les traitant non comme objets +disciplinaires, mais comme *archicrations* problématiques. Chaque +tension y sera relue comme une bifurcation possible : vers une +régulation viable, une impasse pathologique ou une captation +silencieuse. Ce chapitre constituera le point de bascule, le test ultime +du paradigme archicratique : *permet-il de nous aider à discerner, sans +dogme, ce qui tient un monde debout — ou le fait vaciller ?* + +Cet essai-thèse convie à une lucidité active : observer l'effectivité du +pouvoir, discerner l'articulation du fondement et de l'opération, +rouvrir des formes de conflictualité légitime. Il propose une lecture +critique et située des régulations qui nous gouvernent. Une manière +d'observer ce qui se joue, non dans les proclamations du pouvoir, mais +dans ses agencements concrets. Une méthode pour discerner les formes +différenciées par lesquelles une société s'ajuste, se tient, ou +s'effondre. + +Ce livre a pour unique vocation de fonder le concept d'*archicratie* — articulé par le triptyque *arcalité* / *cratialité* / *archicration* — comme hypothèse heuristique pour lire les situations politiques réelles +et situées. Les mentions de détectabilité, d'opérativité ou d'épreuve +critique qui apparaissent çà et là n'engagent aucun protocole métrique +dans le présent volume : elles signalent de simples repères de lecture +et d'éventuelles pistes de recherche ultérieures. L'ouvrage n'édicte pas +de méthode d'évaluation, n'agrège pas d'indicateurs, ne promet pas de +simulation ; il propose une grammaire conceptuelle pour rendre +intelligibles des configurations de pouvoir. + +Penser l'*archicratie*, ce n'est pas restaurer une essence perdue, ni +bâtir un système clos. C'est remettre la pensée politique là où elle +devient la plus nécessaire : dans les frictions entre ce qui agit et ce +qui justifie ; dans les écarts entre ce qui régule et ce qui est vécu ; +dans les tensions entre ce qui tient ensemble et ce qui menace de +rompre. + +Ce que propose cette entrée en *archicratie*, c'est une autre +orientation du regard : vers les conditions d'effectivité du pouvoir, +vers les agencements où le fondement et l'opération cessent d'être +dissociés, vers les formes nouvelles de conflictualité légitime et de +co-viabilité existentielle. + +C'est à ce point précis qu'intervient l'hypothèse de ce livre. Non pour +ajouter un terme de plus à la nomenclature déjà saturée des formes de +pouvoir, mais pour rendre à nouveau pensable ce qui, dans nos mondes, +continue d'ordonner, d'affecter et de tenir sans toujours comparaître. +Si les catégories classiques demeurent indispensables, elles ne +suffisent plus toujours à décrire les conditions effectives de la +régulation. Il faut donc déplacer la question politique elle-même : non +plus seulement demander qui gouverne, mais sous quelles formes un monde +devient encore habitable, contestable et reprenable. C'est ce +déplacement que nous nommons ici archicratie.

y_eQgq(95Z*PJYD^aO!{#ZS1;&arx=Gy)Xwyur8@bTrzx=tm>J zCYzF`l!~Bm1+@jbEG?z~{7>I81y(?wA&GR_L)__i>`fKb`vEWSGlZkxRG-;0e!s;_ z=NGy$;ggkrU~g{nd@iv z?J7X9uG)dQ0GW~VRMxbLX=1e>jVmZT`!g1+Z4yOXhsoW69Zk5i0tMp#Jkd--DHRst zt87#u36*~?a@fN~Pv2HBRi2Un{WF4r!4KX}4@58- z;5l_o_Aro>>#hqaK?bHrr0`dWs{=)>RRtG;#@^j@26kAX{IB`Q3g)@q(TLA(eGGC!^tu~dxj zpXDdGWcksmkx^Ta?>7}vT92k!U4$tg%GSIOa;c`xx{N?o_buk* z{cFKVN%a6^yU=Cza(Q2%>X|Ct`4M6fLVmJ_H zM4Se4JJ28;!~lnMzVaQ=Q2VN7SwSdNRVsnw85BZ)MmN4m4Z&Nw?q#XGFOPkwO@^_f zlYCW6|0a_Z$fGgs)aW7ZwFRY$G%~}k!;VD-jI-7gH+E@3qVci*Vi)6-Ux5^LwlTpP z27ibEoNT;Q>U@504o&-v-`~SCf}EQ+2GDN_B7YS0juNpkX=xSw21FDEIyh$Q-V0Fq zt4ar(Q%bdP_TQLKWeTIg4L-=GVV3gMg4B@K-zEn!PZk47Pv=E_IeuBT%IiZ z^Qq#-$x$r0!_Go*JZw$PYZd}qA!tb|f!-+NE93ySrA3Pi@A&5%^+?ni25|fxR_vDE z4EAY^5^&%pIVNGreRkzG9$gDAXL64vCw?`_^7CFNZ~OQ|yGGJ8b?SQYnrF zc^v@7$PV<)6zcVnYv2Ob`e+3}I30HZ6gCKO^&vBUl&w~^(f4r>m2pNQAl|9i_L7aL zn53c%arN^sv(CNVaim}*6_~8`O+eo`rbYsh>_yq3`JuSA6d$da4S`XhiHtY+tF$9W zCy{O#pA}DsSVCe9*RPaA+QF)-r=!e@;X+}!zCq9{aK8h|N>}>OI8+9S{r}U3;HQ~LB zjzPQ2oyjIWs~qREVAjl&7da0CDUCvE#cyZf17ukcMxsCfk}$OfiVB2?=kllq8?^AS zAMU3*PFNJtoI^Vso%VpjXFwF1@lyriVZBXD<AgS%Ik;FKPDMbM(R-_Ai(mr%p8Ti40}Y)=ECa&Q+viKJ*gAums>M z%R3tZs6gzM@t<0?bSa6HzITk)hcosh7t*uam9mjLTUs#upu)dMe4Y@;z{ZB`8vDFUVAR@r%0@Z?6*}NS|dIn~9=Kn)2_Kg2SEzafsUSi#KznpHh_xx;R z)^@Yc)OPnhyWu_VzE|8v-tZNnb5GCu<2Ia~o>Wi`Ho>2ldnZq%nXf*|zPb7W|Njt+ z-L9|H-k0+SueV+&yR##=zMq<$xITxw8J)O2pEE8y(fDub^QcZ}X)uuH$8SshNow2#RmGF4Y z!AQTEu%mzOub>@_><-bJ&4{Qfaxm|~M729noaFZDO2*8&kuJ}5BzjBg))m`MN+DgI zX-lAFV}EM15TR8F<(hW#+cJID!6}+3%bV*Z{(vIL)d* z%v<1;zSULRa}Gj#{33EpZBO(}S$|*$^2?aB!P##<2`e?6eSyvHf%E z#66y45LQl0vH8>4d4bhj!Mmymj-DN`e=(#@LB!nj;>j)~CTdQkDLLPKKGqT`b#GEEu66fide%p@th7f++I|YT#pCwDapYNU6o=IAnX&c8rM^C8#muT+sfA0O zh)}jV%35*L{PIyTU8lW|m5vK5yd8Vm_H&mp@S*}d*xHoy zfm(2hfgpp?N}})7rT89wuLO^rNWiZk3U@Qm9Doua?oMI)0Qs4btgX^<>5`u$zC;6% zoCEqv_)9P^X6XAs8H+~2Qw;jz+fPxsR2yAsF2=a~uzmA;Zkgmf)>!!w_o=V-eX6T4?GwGIJQPIORy7_q%i2sK?)X zUl)xacZ&)4rS6C`+SRN-vvdzF-VnY%!{+iddSNoO&@u#KAbgaP^r2b=pZJl=9eZ$V zrjQnq@7^mI5)|H#0Tp0IoU2}reZ&q{&>d~`RUHqYoREYR2XO`?7n1U|G@8K-H~b%r z&}m)N!3}_+E*nO`4@3Y4#Z?Grd>LJvw7`?`=FXk0!g2Hg6?Y#i;(oeO-NHBb$eXE` zO2Gmm!QDQc2%yT?#2&F~80NP_$1J(e-F!v9btba)CkUP;Y+XGSPxXCuw}Xu?RL2f2P-8lY9o9^7IAdJ} zg|@Eb;Rb^f{hU8&3Kg!a`=aPECMRUR65w>rSu*EZ9%nQeYjX(-JO{4#J$p+!cMxBK zm>QN6FEj;9;h<@Ie_0@c!g@`pQm6%#SsU-ju>PP%INfp}yT*YFjObU(;sZhXa|8$c zmzr@8NRBuG4M36LuA*q&q~o`V3H_)Q*t;aUVn8a_sZ4>7o~^q!U^hm*{DiCEyQv0Q z^Emvuv2k5cgSvsIHB)!a}iv@>6{`V zL+k@caR<_-mx0$9q!x?KKW<82aEMq<0qBnhmNNrU=ET3SC@Ec&(Ow)FephY z%rq|jovMlm8Iz=KSUd~s2J;=?5TQ-G)iUF_o0Fiaw@PFBaOsL zvhep3E6?vYBI|0!`}gB4kL9DS@97omjkoV>w5{(yk=mZe8CNUOa}4i(ovGc^Owd-B zm)mal6OC(VUOL|s@Zz<*@M94Mf6Vks^g2fN{4ZAAd|DUf*wXlkTbh7LFWT=3(k@Ax ziJ@7^gP9X{gBF1m%zCUaJ5X=dkQ*DRsUS-}IeHbfeBGz~sTC*42kv6@>x2GNtU4>7 zg*agHG>3jk_o$li^}K_lTY%)zxb4*@%(TRj85Wu2)h^EG-UN!l`PB-PQ(J1UieR+< z&zVA}JGAJRj0V@KlSfbBf^Shf=u2evqek|d_|8bO6zgG|tT1^pyyuQyJoTdog-LHZ zh9~RV&6>qTQKs_zETps3=pE@oFN~^VJsltIoL?K5UiWmO(|+BAhXql%4vM7XFCuL3 z1F}^=JwM$if7s*?tQoHK(MIc|+E{058L!QuTJ-1|AxCpvlbZFWh-#E2$cd+lQXGn| zXh0!7m%1;RR3r|kRYpqd<|<+2q~oWv*D4)i@I6M6pRx*Tak3E-8e4GDnHMc(>Yuw& zP}CfU2ze^VBu2WR(pgkDA3m>WshF9{XYluQEM8^AR*0C_Mwp{UZ%UH><>ZrIWdOJm zaa?|gd=+E_XdaxU!hqI4mIDH>{6nqo2pO+Xft(1;S6Vho#Vz`@p&@?U#v)ajcF!~m zsfM%*t$DpU(069f>&)XDwXy)JX7B1%k%nmf+{&mripyyDF3s@2e6FOO3x;sw~E zf0^XZmFJ`Ag9ym};evE_=q6Oe5RimGCXDN;F9)$^tcOS&RN=Nigvd|gn*!b> zJD?rLDW^5cLsc3SMPyaE)dMqwNIIqR!^~ZW!jlSDPKvN4^YdWQL*c6{#l^@XrV=j> zEj~jdkaBpaN1&pg72OABXMI3qkWyQWSuly@pl=ZS0=jL*Vl5Hb8s#R4&*jy@=VjJ0 z_QlAk8AErQ$C|@`)>@?HuPtjXRo5d!S|^q5?25mk2J@9RZ?Lfx^q!O z*;tGK^d7O7L`#jQziTFtaAguWQ;DF<=X;&-h=uTT}(k9l7!60DlFHDA_T2$IDs zPL(S6_Ed8w{kGxP7318>PKBIM2Ey2|K*E}YcQQ-}VYQn~<6?xx(5}ntz1?mr$5YR9_V=3v(dfxRq z1h%u*NGT#c;HDQAqkomQdR`EMsqUYMN%nu0lhXGlj z_W#BBh6>tx)93}cefdtKHiXhglrBL1B}6p4I13ExwHDe4A2HW}j#m*C86<#k(dHm% z&O0{L?w4rUsotZ(#%8@?L(RWhVKwDT!_oIr>8t|lE?fG5gAp?|VM&3@trJC2Xj*%@ z{M>R$Gn8@6Kj6rcYr(J6uhCC*G1G5T(Wz&h5~{f{{)91WEQ_jTr%Rh4OD1|Uf#*n9 zc5`6{Ch|m$HkQ-+k#XrTe}rS9VZxe6j+{xuj4O!2015}6kS>%RBhxZN-x1a z|2{cn{^y(CsY6w=Y)c@$86o@4ttI_|7v?Ao4oHbI{9lwG_Be{x%?x`TUIC?DjLLH;#_lsB8y;q`J)*aW?+9B|a9s z@=OtmA(4s(-X6stLW6+9xbyT5n!p;>N)IFJI2cY3FQ3u2m2oBLY;H!kpqC?>l#|&~ z%$?+9FC3y4bgtZ0dowZzg1-haS+%*~mTku(!Cp)y)YDp)(>G^q*3d8+VEbv}52jrz z)w+IE1f$}Xmlew`J$Pt`UC_WI^c9GIT7t~~o7dB}k#N-6D5^&?kDSDhMx&TWqF@e$ zL?UGwW$RP8X}cYPfa<`=R6ZVV{GD9M{MdZAyyO)idIUte#s4;Jz8}<=fb>K7L;P0V z^7au?T}>#Wl1shFlJL))sewo~yU}M=H?po-iOGoeG77e=r4-Hh>0%jVmBaS@ub_#0 zSP@H!X}G#xGymQM*q|+E2})-{c3Mo)Uc&pEO=uoHp9Bt>?e|>;$Ine7^s_Fq7@43< z;fNS8LBJ63%%0yzn4*BH83*s4*S)>awF8KeQ>cR2EXBe}xDusM_3Eq^qsFiHPDw1R z74ylniP}@_5PRHs^ozdH(@iD=bT9hK01cWwPO#6R3aUz%v7za<%5L0zXa!u32CJU|3KE){ zBL(GC`Pr2hNT>9+;0#MRMx8nlS0t6{xYG4KV6_Oj`F&s~nWsGamcn<9c}4-e{20P1 zSZ4!Ao?2EXX;5!ZQ~P0?_*51PX|QlY z=nrHG2syxjePsP!Ci8kFOM^L$aPOWMvjTq;ztj2kyH)=F!&!H=`iJc6A85IAy6pXG zwd7*ve)7}x_bH5T^Y2bqjt2ylr>AMK)xclT&1c-xs^wb27Wsjq*Y;X8*;**(ZvN(Z zW!qomO$y8u&8LTQ=9V8$0o;Zu3+{F){a|x`B6pM^xZ*U}M*Of~#mFBr2>|DD!9dAY z>G}Nrl=&Uu%U0^9bz=TV>Y~q3NX+c{FLk$_a=u6Z1 zzS!uT2A!EF-rKokGxbldy((rRU3C*WWCgLvt&C2EE&S33+vU!2SMF ztzwXu}_L}qv**)2P>zsfmCPf-G)P5n6K`*R*{^t@8ls{)N>hsF49?J*;f4qzsL z62BiuCWi&D`~uAbiw*IiYMeV|L9AH)<9mH5LRj0gE>c63l7wgqBmSV)I_6&-dn0OI zAzCRU5ZI)*3^BleFz}0Y@w0nB&6*(J z5a*b+Z2yC*_-w9t30IWmb0@;bD39TEka{Axk?otZRCq*a zOD2aZm3!}zjWe*}E$5bOO*|l!YyB_AhZvDHW5%jHs9A_I0H=|{Qm$*K)1h^W>JydKzf1A$(RnFEv68E`)-92RL*Q%R6CB! z3`~YyJRGebA5VoYQwS-2Q=`vrO@iF7(6_){+JFC!O$&+r5L}>eW)|pQ(brqshlNlK z82DN5gKe&`KWhSRQYF|i7N0EVA=|<0ceMxZ0 zDA79~;(;Q7+bB7R{oKd)L@)Ez%>JXW(P5Qiw|?G!Z`}t6Qi z29BSti5vs2O!uX&G?_)gXG^kG%XloeHlo-292h76P6H%ssd+2gFDzTI2Cl$XM^!X) zy%h=SjdWwS8dDyfWbgFu`)|MReXHlUvd>FHC%FjX4nEA_e2F~hkN&BtG@1_0w6*oP z{aI~e4`3$v1dhi}eu!G|%5W7AwGWle#CwG^xvr62_<~nuSb>pM8mD|A_Iq*L%71Z! zrNWFYHEUpG2r0s+ePD<+3PhA|Y}$%@_M_LH`~r`UqB97Isx%GdZcA-IdO zfHweO_ux|*N=M=MzyFAM7;}FCLo{KaLmjtUR59i%9)UPl0G;yWD#U7wj;&WoYNoo* zW;*)aAdMzr(U70jHmE`h1lxEbwP*1^o99meCcxtz`v64s?6Tfeh8YPDdvoK76Hdxc zaZ9_TL1B1ZK>{7!)@0=2$@Q6pK?w0T@3FeEL$oe3=dHs5r(yo*- z)-8@^`=pPe-Sk3(crEBg_m$cRD#h;ofa8lfQv93|QA75S#oY{7Tt88T1!bOTyVCwX zn;D*&E6y!F=tJZZ(U8I>6nU12fQ1`0E_-VGsdt;18}Gv46;%0)h5>0Njxf^LY)9~) z4&xAqu^Pj)+nFg>WVD}Y-sYJIb^TIQCm@&#gPEr_s}O= z!I*6%>x(6%3}X^jwoH1n2%uij)YaoD-&nU5!&}Y^Tu=C5Y8LH6 zU^b)z(n}cbrb7J0%eu=Q`#(s3fQ)w*teiG(6zn*FZkduU0x1U?Q&d2rDUZ<26%2jV zJPFR-^?U*HtkB~}C{&peMhEGo5$d)+XU!Qd)5m7cuzYW9sDpgh=bgQc z>VgoKwQH4*D#j4-9UW{$gfPgxvbaQwPqcRSI}{iOP<%t9g#v9s(7h*6Rr89ysKJ^z zfD>f;xDoJpP2;^)D~#n6XQm6@6EPvwkUgB2mus}Qmmaqe$JD8y3)&18cFBF4#Q4Tz z)xdo~s?POItCc?8IlcWPwgwP0#`lWD7YlRkJlggc6rx;=em1^}tm9CA+AbQf;1Y01B1AO*%v ze)Zn%8Adr-(GaLYPY}%DQDQcyLgw`2Uxk}+YbsiEW9C^7y{DA7Wjx;Q!Uz4xglBZB z*|EjFHIvlw%x>LN6Z0YRqmo5tVA3-B(LmZ44 zTSHue@_{CW&lc!EIuWi216ouTb)~mM%cC@|te_N@Zo6K2xTabKq5L_?P8zh-i;BM0 zJ5DkyjcfMH1m`;S(D+3nV}|MPRn2_VUzt`eCcin&-Y5vSMa9o%KTA?<=Q+?_oSD`} z+nbz`leS(V{2s&R-^A02Ca0ESUCyQ>&!mo0u1l#s^T&LY!kIN;9Err_ayxcR?md6t z*a&La5u{Hn-BvvbJidBoW1|WUuZc1Fv_XLk$?7a_U(lAAmnaze9q_xbEJsnG+62QKAG_I_9D?Q<(23@{#rsQ5}ldj-o z91sNv6jEY51^?Teha*2RMfRwz`lZRfvfH^uG5)|7Pbe>aW-yo|*Y5!0FOlcCACu#r z(PoK?ii^@fHBalq8&qq4EqDJ5`;a3hsEm7Hts{;wmr=ywVolXRb5ET2}DRL!Oj$SDNe=^6H z@C5I^1}|!J(7Y?e9|vEMped6oY;4GP=wuT_1WysAX6zKcb7q7;Jxuti1DDUIt#kF( zi4`V`L&a&iXs-h@4;jEXxda6#)LM*MkM4ElbBySO6|}3qBWgVfSwq-_=bSrfv}n$O zG@_mA-M4B}(=>Qkh%l+-J(JvvU0e}}=@v+H(bE%&C`M#X5oD0R5zXMdRQKYl4WP~L zz)ufOvBdoeNk?N5dWW{b;<&D-;M=tA2|63u{j~}5)|`ZD6a=?2Qrv)vYZogMK5tV4 za39L2BcVw7YH3`DPebX;W(_=W2e(l6iVtb5{a6t(GYqYw3MqndwFeOdUiUQLTIWlk}$*WSrvMmH3J4ic4TO>Pe<@xBqs z{q7jRzW%saHpV^@q7fg0&!Qb>oUHjxH?G&Xf=@xxI}^zl5p8vljL+J#YNQDMd-P~) zk#*{owY6##@WkS}aJnj^uTL@eeFk=~Y>fF*)50blOy?oJQ8X{kA_@X7IHx%Lv(I7T zd6JgmIB;OEgz=ydfO&wenM0#>=860^&-wuR`ti>IxXFaPje>|&=TyOue|5j_H>}V* zOHe6wQRnj3rrZ2!JV=%R#H@|VZ7`f_rPJOYh=nn+_{QEKpr_1T@>L}i`5cN#CLH$A;u4Ox$#0wF6yHKd5lTksaTFVg5+PY3b{1&YP zL!v+ZBnLBbrtk@EoywF;D1v(|Vcm9V1-#g`EV{O6f#%w)yrEdI-auSogqY!WvaH@p zK=Ss7YHfn}Znmh~kKm6l6@ zrC5lJiF1>69;|U#wK_=QhEa8VQvGEg3tKzqDGf}LaM|DoACjOp=i``f{vCKee?;s{ zn0%nb0D*hN3GJ9-%YhWBbS6T_l2PPs%6MKarH74hMQBZ79w_DT5}IGdSg!{^oaf5H zd5vVo5Hm)KZ;Uln4Kb8DuB;>&v3jr{6~{zOl2S@+GpEBpiT1eNk`;mxq3q1L1ge%{ zVpx2yR0NtEhxlauPg?w%M7k@DdL-~|-M zDD%l4*Ia~AW)62K7!ZFe(h7Iho+VmOSi}I?sS3ls+VGe>UB?WTo2V*&?IO5?(-uyV zAO{#E+m>XSmh8PmTU_Ih(XuKnHb>!4297I-+NEDyugA)0TI7j!V=mkQDBcSp_f_L& z4kHo-MAgXSbI}#m_mgMFSf#ux>cEBhaV$Ze$z)%#xKBu1E zFjLYWvaO=r&dteKJa@suE}`b#EhZI zIMWZ6s9~=hCN82`p^P(AT9;w?XtoZx_9^Hx#*bA_Cji8;mCT;h75_4FzKXWY27onl zXX{@3oa7x>Fy8uVJLW2#uiYxjbx1!$g2sVMhv$VMb#V-h2xFVELva)QFEn}Eym}JZ z)Zr!ctIR3EVM_RM4On9)z)zv?F_d=dTm+jedluLnHf%hLZ}*uNqD`m%M^Hbs0SJ8! z0s|Y=qMqJ~^9eAC-o0c_F~vNv?u>ML)KD1?+-Xh+#e}chvwU0`F#3V-uwF=2^&|Ty zR`~*n%~$zZfAn$Q-`*m5Y9#ZPbo(jUH@l!EuyRCyP;sirog#Cq(jPrjV%{bu_l!8M zwuwGr2x6&cEM7m_41^&Qhl@IaUP*ZE*mvYra+4LpI5Q!8Dt&s=zmN$q9ko$-P-&}# z(uoL@oT3FV?H|U9+X7qXkL|jxLovTrATA$BpTlB1vLEG_5G629dC%a;?DJKbP0<@5 z_@tMeMWPOhJ4!#&INT!VIeJ9HpdBc)Z5F|7VS7#)1c6pKL=tS0%aT!@niPvgjAAa^oTS%nJ^Iy zM=zXsNcB8|8Ua-D|WCG z_mYqu4nJhS&YM)G_b0&9uHgPYvJMkD_@iU9I!^Um?Q#34vYRRCojyeADj|(Qtj#yF zyrDg08=zXxvU$Ez%0yqiTrbah!DxLcQXwq^U5&$peM5DwC3f)@Q#QwHYm|>UA!6N@ zN4n23%&*+h{mOpXqM|UMzzQ%>-N}@;WSmSFh;!}oP>d&!81t!33swyke!D*^d zhUWvuH0A!#UYxyvBX@G1DSj{+gko$M3W8~ms#UH|W( zx$9Y7kEvowH@nvi0uFMV<=l^F1-qY%u3`yfM!PEkqBYI{4^?vz@OqYWm}IB(eO;=q z>M4?idIx9liK}vmIL9UzqzDaQ&aA5fTXZcy)K|IW`8k|w|J7uV?2q4nhjaOH-W})GCOpcU1~r=~ zbe>e5L6IY=8vz$ohV99g--As4S(l2N>ZO_24!>V?YY<@zq+Y#wHfRG}5@MU7f>2wj z*eK99o4i8t&G1qr7o`)q1=^(N`8roNSr^R{LTI~aoTg}7Ot?+`;cJrSU5=RB`}XS3 z8tM;=f`Sq(dx%XUU+QU!f}nPjdnv7{9+?frx@*aYuX54JVpIo8;}})Sz{`uyiDpzO zs!j^J*kT??vlMr-U!%U}@%SQ4py-{hap73&xgA?-a-nF}I{;r78pWL`C=4??bO|#!* zr$i*Wtso-6HcDDlD#R<%O$_9<8*)66Zo7N*C;WHmSWq}|B9ddV0D_}1PWnVXEg?Ic zeRU`MW@)|u9+Z?XH+D&P-&jjm(4F>FnI#~~+k%*f4MBMfLuo1{4Ni8;{sur$BFMaG z1c_c!WTYWcov@KWRPXledMsE}$3p3-X;U#UX18L^YHv?&&s^E+&`UEdT^Z{qX(`j; z?QVH#Gob1K$eo3O(%Y{|((q95+K$h+g36JbZb(qyh#x5Vx)}b(4b?5esbtPt5JJ=~ z4)lu?cguAPTzw)lFY_DHLaYWq;t~TwsU_+$!ukP6!s7V<7#`?68q*f**nM@w7a<~$ z@KZt}qvqtyC1L$+S_1E9N%*PaM+074X!#+9A$@La^&vd^oNDOht_Kw|s$7ia?y1`p_Yi zUG_cbT$TRLL>hT=l3o)VpJbF$aV@C+qzdG>XN_kp9GY>+$YPs;#Y+2sMr*W@XoIT@ zGk;AX!S`~(%+@4|jGRs9kyEX&^t3rUcZ%10(FX4psMy;`LF8b!WLFdHw3jPmUnyw@ zv@oy`AB{txno1iU0oRV^MFic%7VnhZD%qyETzuf_YlJ;<)8ODxD)<_r?wt2;6XO38 zKW$Ft%9zu%8IdYJvPMzJew<8BA2>d2#EXiO*9tpqB52J~do&3f=3OqzNGYG#zNA)E zDK4G|6vAVKpRmNjfhGhKHm}eDMJ)+qzI_?y@Z(Hlbc10ng^&E(i<(m8_^P%Hh*eSE z@zSfp4!`-!&y{gGuFA^2^_F|qO=(|R=FOsN7JT{p`~6^#L-@#(!u=B8c$tXm%AYuO zUR<&)lq8dx0VytnXkc8am4>H)*C}vnz3)5+5h!M*3Y#%% z6TMbS9dTPW4~ayW@Z4&t3f{r!!>3MM!$a~j2d!2CUi-jXnVjDi5L}Md05ryjU7{Z) z1YyuPjKojNc;3FB5O;Io!e>P&Z!P_iCQ1S{cP%4abI%5{z8IiYTlp^K?w!~nSHLtr zswZzl42gAfC3qy(vJhdNVR%Vtv#-_E|206wa6#FUV7TqLP2GMuY`OVbAs!?(k>+m4 zYJpoa1w9A}0WdKDHOT3esah(2fOSYZ3H2;|U|N9!If#nTISN^R${t)(pzG!M#iSM` z+T>+?0Nep*rQFQtQukHmSA}du$Hbe5bv-({V*8wao;5BsxzCg9 zJ25_b3(x7Ug$PnH=We;nZ67l25R*p7ZUV5saQeE~x-iOu+CP`0@o1kOzl@cjmO^DG zZLMunvBGu4c12Z1FC+^YS{dwcTBlybjG*(HLbgr@RihPaUhS_{+;!SKmh4ibQ|DF9 zpu@G=?Fw?Wo{sHccL|VNJx2gp$1yv5@-zLeEi$aoQy1iq+#a5rBmHupM1_BD1Iz2g zsBw6s))Ng7Q6`!f3W=udnq7+p8ceZlszTT1@O$TFM9>qhj$>Jhz%?Q;B)v5N7*shq zI*CeC2YWNv41|%jf0N^HdmGJ?w}%H&L`kcM!I8E)B`-`6-J*nr6eC6AjFV=)cvpJ; z07Wau!&Rl|DlJ-{>*WbKhk2q1Yr6 z5IVk?R<9e^grgjHHbL^>SjhrGM%+qg&hb;(2mMSY*iWhx&Ja$-cw?5$eV@9oaNjc8 zf1a>yTKvalb*$1hd`J*9T4`Iyjo?lswx{8f(jRM7P8OQBI@iT>HbJO~X!vEGO~?Th%s1(4uXCTYqsuJ~Gr5nLs%?5NdZwg(Vb|kMCM6TrMbNR4hJQm_ z1^A454~Fx-_K?q@r|qti7DtZ=hwtQ$4SY4;QYJ`d2x?T)!7YaO8dWG+&e zzx>-;U(n0Q)U1eX;m_0JwY-#yM?^*~zo-t#t z7k+oktJ|zcqyUiknC6KY1Hh&Av!c_)PyF4aqF3MTIAzVm4i6Zk~#Mo zp%j>rm9f$Y9yuQg^lLX7e+7^K(x}o!ieY~ox9xZKn!bCCEZ+V`RsQ|o-Fp`azcu7G zi2U~3ug&~(liQ?i@$I+Ye$y83+`ad!_rAUR?mKV4``)|v-ul2rrus#nvUcFU=9ha4 zy!#*AtM}gVFNKfli!Tg}zrlV%oORX=&=J&(ICbLi3itEi>z68a?Eg-#=t*R^;-h(c z=P?+LYyF>o)p7lM`**(o`@j3(S8uDAR_WuvtTE6D)J8!!~J9+)yTkq_C-5&T|uiyRP{d*UD&%Nl{+%*hxQJudySQXQ` z2Q+k}&u0CH3i+@5>G$ys?09U&$2NNbNfduP`KYcIjr)FhGt>FMpx=41W&NhI&Z#tm zScr4`Df+so|L70O_R)B2*U@^^U;u4`YIbXjF>%DW;WqVw|RlkZ={^_gw z(azf7ORgjj)Xhq2M0!CP@#WT1jL^+m`dzuZ>iE(}{AMxzVm?+r@j_B!WRB-~{3Z+g z%i!gluX77{I7jx7gzMv*;L08sZGDc7?izWoS6b@BZ0@f%&&zzFiLrpO&xsgZBX9N^ zt?Vb0>c=f5A7n+hYWlTdWoTD|b1humYqZdtf3fe3I_g8bs*1n3+WITniJL`^7Ws>F zDqUeFA4M(^XBDXjYe1|uX^Knj$c>NOuaEq^?L}_Obg#Dkujy(ZX8V6!wZ!ZcsDq;w z5a}}9_{yKXypOoH+e#kUEv&gI(A)3F?!;7eZT;ts&%BD@BwsXbKU4+9B0L6omMzZ~ z)#iD#YxwELbG~ZbEoP2k^H(}q$Cd9%nSo9IAd=aw`->O<#(D17d47cxfPQmzlV)B` zaj)$<6AcJI8Lhp4<;A`6p3~i$H|=_GW~9iwLWd`A1+Q7`?4{kf&7W9!iqs0n|NJ5-%HM+a(b15f z)qpa;QhVsek4{(j*Ar$cH)V2i<3@k}(ta9&y{WWl13;1*tn$r&kh;gdZ*FqWE2<+p zQCpO3H_v+`NvP3)<;Hhj!4gNacoF|NX~E)IwbkZ%ky8=*#%mtRYd+M0qwJPWYuq@? zpML_rzz7T3%Vo4pZ2LqW{Kj$q{AHGkN!K2M7qK8o`7E2V)?#|2Le2bD*89eHZrcjs zI)aJfndu~=cTJ0Ep{1f>#Z#-y15BgCwnHwo--MG;!us8jxJ<>_% z6P9pyGD_Zf&sQpOZJyWFF+vh9ZaY#p_7zLxH?DHJxc{hQ*0We1kZf44ZfgxX2svJP zdhBMoFY=XB?c9i$k`wSkh;U9!cbCh=|71w^VEk|V-^l(ZHuU!F;8fbz zia76)r{k6iyBCXm4r8LO4Am!g6$=ZO7gbd z%O)*XDIx`|oUPWVs)2I*OYG==GQi7Bw={uMw^~uuVM+yP4Jk>okBVwaJqV%WI$yCy zD#TDiY{wTI8J$#6$sz_tYGf+H+AAbtGAad&q-2kR%Fe!OpDciy_Osj%)N-HlV7JH6_ku8QZK`IQ0o#%Kf$WoSI8`%h0)UtGbOm5IWk8SSgIPtd!@Zb`%NG&<~8*2 zt#~1ahv*`rRApo3yK71$4ETUusR<=-P8RuIq_ClEQ+4`-6KU(C$)i3HN2;B86HdyP zIUV(q?3GZ7JnCiqM3Yf$4Er9XFk-@2Yu-vtxxE~#D8BG7i&bOvF(U~f39U+b+bb%SNEMqxPM0&{mqfiuL+mRTXedl?f2R2nCRvj2lYmlr z_4j`3hmbg<`eg|jT`G(Rp*-BJr^R!E}R2H&@NP%a42)sW3`; zN*#>g3$B?+#g%7`S7pN{`|r5(1@m>j2p@cz1yst;xAl)U<4QhN)hD$tONTeVDBX*9 z-JkKlvTO0N8|>HHmyeAN*Nv`!KDS|?{f>KAUx(dERQjvSh)Umm@BO>)e0%q;ci;Kd z-SwPY+Iz7Kx;7eR+uG!KQ$z0wT37#NPhaQD6Hz(JgG-B$S1zd$~2BjLVa1U2E7 zcha6s%Y6E5-44smvtF1Ol`5QnOjXJv(tIbI<@KF*>48ZM`r8BM63&SD+o%dh7_!=uLpR9M1$A8ac@`=_XVWId_m>+Rj? zM66M6$&aK$!NrY;ukj>($zzqDR;#?mhcwFQeU*w(yL~f#eLVFrcwutz)gB&EBBlDoD!!cJaz)_{0+@0(36R|ld ze_(4Auo*|2e?2NgY0_xMyCreNY|9IU=nE?;+VsJ8_i+u-vD=RnH%D?n<7H%Zmi9?8 z>5Gbl6eV;?!G%fd44XFCJ1o~IzW`$}bSTu6m2s66{W^OuA`<0nZEeFpKWoi;u8X~Dt+P_)sumfnA(xJ3uZbwHHl(I5r&W_r z?P;+4!|?UzZDIl)8p;H;QV6!IhwW7rRkZr0T_oo>Y|y4nE z_bcTK*gnSLAHo__aS!VtGAcC4_P1GFwsvZsZ~lZ`+R0Z8?KqfNx`4t5Ez0X~VD{+Q z?Tq@0{Z&AVR?zm`yIHpDxrV+(e2VR($Vav+De<_>d&7!vS*elz#Y7+Ul|1@O^s6uR z-L5lo&h5#K=*zyCl>N4)ij1BY)3vHnhl$UTx({OKaw%x`)v2{NYEJ=KSeXGqH>69m zC#^Tb3g8`3{Y5{D)?ioUtO+b@diAuHjcCFeE*8*!A^y#t5zk`>^R#SB=VGvpvLLS# z;h^I3&Na($uei;zdrN$2BMj|@vLSs%y9nV$=FpqI_Py7L={N2MBp;_g;9+SwgOP?`)Jqr z;2r;UXZLiqKKQ<}PtoUe^}$z##u-vwh$uuga~m7J zuj@qT+BLSY+yOYim_{6$u&~bJmsG5d@m%z>IW6juFWa--O6)GWeqAscKu_40A%hdr zE9u4;s-u^p8=*!t@*IhlJK@24;9E$g*Ld{d?^WOK1L_A7$!&dW2~VrY7tt6j+r`R> zIU>Aqm=KqQ#cYMh-<*n?%72xr{D+=f=QW2>6;RPH-*rW*un3=E3BpDV*ACKgVXRZ+ z3}W_v3Yz=}_`^i|KB%ZkD#xU$R%JA641g)ERR9!jzK~d7pa%&p0>T+?#G*Y4TQbce z1+(c<)SW|6n^T)%YVP3xHZ})}tI2lxzCn?;Vp{yQsfwiwV5>AJ%Xmqhj-GMwtwbBm zu9qTJ1Vds&{q^vIPVe;QKV2a;uKJ&K`@d`J@A~gH|JALx7_#>mq1#*d@z2W2gItDT zME2uf?_{6g%*k1ri)iEo0wxmh^6?xs!`$YCQ?<%0U*I?LLHn^~byAgMFXg_pVf2Hx zTYw&6WmLpA)%sHIRiSI5=4&0x7R~O&X-T1L|K{u0oBy-yQth)$fnG(23T*8=4)QF_ zo$RBst>@Y2)lj2ERtJ-&ydtn_uCnF=!eVLW()ItBA*Y6g08kT%&rc#I#;-U$)2GVH zz@8$fi*}oqpYy_9L5zpHlRXZgR+0HdRNjuY$nLsY#pZdf$fTz7FWN_(HpNqqS*bvz}`zdc%=^$AapgMwpkN0Pm+KINMI0vYY9Mb(6Uz}hCjOiV^e zC0siJRtkp=-`kJt&H9=_TI>n-QJqE9hT3P9HJ??ReYD6|$LPVPw~3#(t2TRV?>kj=V9ntN@7|sz&)gE- z9xEII%+RKz1In0&KQ`1HKXpV$Fgew{g888oIlG7gysb_;h5DciNvsjRh+`89M~FHS zVo0x@n|bhQll{}zj~|nJwa*@-p4KEU#fklncMP3U>MtCGD%$4Chuk!9x zKo}e_=^e@-rQ1a)Gy)t!jL`Pxh{wM6Q6>g5p?9Nrnt=30CD4!2;nru_B1eDIW!v*{ zKzH^%u zOtrNAWIie?H95o>utG}*$~?BuA|DA@>JjfV3yiHHo|+tT3=_d*iuIB4K!H@-aFAd) zjuqll2;A7=x_$wh)`Df6RU5bt%z<)wgt`SvnTcgRMPEdS3qe@)Ibu{mD`4HF|K|X! z+Mw$>r)krrWh?u{C9F2d-TY~E&uPhwR#{&XTT`vw7U`l0M3h5Yv!-A-p#Zxv>g?H> z<}!F~Gm2`V0ON9rIVeAl;W|VIF~YuNn`pfVQ-DP*hLO{(0mQqmbAqv}2J)~CnK=16 zY7Bj--|D_prUf0QFY}*NYQ7TF`Bj&nlzFO9Jay$SVM>NMd{}y9WcDyHUDgx~uUWI6 zEueS+l-g{Pp=nfEbvjyDF-=d_w_#Y2vTGwW5O8}gXL&XRT;BELy|@r0;pSiV{)pyz zPk)dJF-;=;nO0Liwu#WtW{<|cZxPurc{;IqCyK|O@}nNB7de0{S&IvYwbXs4SsG0T z2^h^-W9J-0)UVUdl*ts~!uO+U$mBC2W>m{?$dZjib{zSxTdM6g9Yi7u#wF)z8v>e? zGY)Jw|Cuhawb|E6)m3$xqLrAHWaullcw3M^Iy8rH10bX~2$ULYZ^fI`Mv1L~UA*KSY20_tgU~oblgO6Hw&kENP%S9fi z#7UKNplRzO$u{4RgnKNIHv&WeA4cF)nT_lCgJ|$WB3u4?oq&%OD zMXHV9+xGTU2tVf*ga-IzR1gE)2-!iuHpP&GGPc_4>H4DEr=TKiv(HfctIZ*bZU}%` zf@y*3v5zv>^tMQpPNM4e*4;O^%iD8y71VN}LlNfjsulSOse%1IFmlC|CBu!t>59M$;+pEVB=+lz_#y#w91Ec@jy~ zut5a_J=Lp_n6IdGG++x6=AOsU<;$w)0OlJV3F6kJO__2>=@1+!m3(}GE{l!FHvh&3 z-X1oVLU*M(P5XmzM)%EuR%Y48X+t#D-Yk2RLD(S)B;`VP;<79#d$)w(` zo<`nA>&Nu{*gMK_^g7pL7kI!NyP(V~Y7V7x*Flux@26Mitz?Yq@!5(vg zC(WlNYtv9+4^~rvmt>|4fL@fytkupJjy4S)$GmB%UqZL+Stw{}23{g_Yy7Ijgm!D} ze`CP*?0WHq9xCacyf8xyYMV%>*szv5u-@mT(e^ z3BS)Ndh-%rJ+zKzv=Ntf5F8G|Q_OmLidM^Y?b?+VQshw&lNFzQy(N9fCFp4sKDD=L zZS_f)Cu*z`d8BFv0^5#>nrE38K6x>F%+);es`RMee7#1+Vjt%7`h|#zvzb-iZvHcE zHnYk*K1?Q(sogPHa~zGeD`%Y3Yu@82Q}r*;#^gj9g$l}W-m8x^9YE;Sv@1sfsY6{+ zsM>8D7hY=NB5IF-@N;AJ4nxE={p%>$1?i>zVwBPw<+bBffRLeVp7mri3wjhQ z3I!*gvFiM!*cNqJswd|VT4*|OC|_HPTfj=?@i~Mw@2{=|2Lab*j?+-48za;LR=F zb5~U>don?E&lGU`&@;WWfnTmCTvH4N@Le8W7n4`(P){tZaNV5WMZ>;CrB4|8MOBA` z605uhr-QPh2GMfhc^wm!kf=rSE-5Y7bX?cz7xDBeG{tkLZL`ZcGOAS3@BLJ4VKQm5 z%@sC__jsCH2BNfg#r=Nj|2EH$^I>52(^TN}ajbyyLcm#zgqJ8w@z+ysufSZ`C)y>* z7*VxfP_5K7nlSX9j0GnVb|)|36M;tUwM-G>5zdF?(OXJlCL`-oq;gZ|u^5)rQ~DPv zcODulxPPicuK6IFZx3Z96pSzjf-VwiYe#EqJ;c_((sl$b>(8%?M`?kSt{FbcwB2NU zB<1Pd8daHC|Ae7N37IS^*?={6 zuIw)Djy+_c7OgMnk!3CD_A66UnjW$}o%;eeYcm!1#?;w-o)@YiY2N|i^DLTVO5O@g z&$|dVtGq>$sTicwiV{)j6?n6^1@BTm1&?j@rg}mK5hbvjNSly&#N8Wty%)l4~fn3AXzH;HA6}$==p=Tbb=r z2X+-WR4eB6;Bg=zkugMg-JuVA*3^W^BD@=#S7cz#*F(_UDOy}x)Fb!SqETMDhr2lU zgKDZ1ei5DR4q1-Z>{RtzJ-B*zyM!jtDHD(Ph z&*TJ|j?{LU7sAE*QhFdWC7GtjT^ZLeQpE_(yzGsz#pbJvmsa=o;Bi4#VaA%p+GK6) z)VJv9QbND_O}$fjn2yX^K=x!O0T~E8%nmvZm9A33CGmkw`92~| z^rDd|TMW&k-Ff$ex8LRw0~u}S2yLX~Pc31w=%%6oUEo0uBFx6M_S z-Ll4}SQ>k|x09umIu{kV031ZcXTDLu$+iE2v+o|jJv-FGIec-*LaXll?D0v7ZZ?*@H+z@kEhCQS|6uAlG{HB5jBio3^mmZV%laYUge| zDv0}OtuydmwS_eiOR9JRy3wDJ7}v24MUd&-B6tE&cB9h*p1 z+p%daj9i+f66K;O^^ixW3ZP1-;OUM5juXNgsX+Fj3ap=F%z>lFV%K>3qRF>?VCTVY zu)avY`O0&|C_*}byZr5Me)mbDJH4gSm)UPV`}j8QTLZP!&-YPPqh^+R$jk*t;%pLc zY0yjdf}c+XVbEOR5+tNX2hxTZFs)Tgm91^Cv|3w3(aU&FAZrx$CmU$2YwHLVyQGE> z4y1^Mj`LCI3B3Rki0peet}Bb70;I4nNkZIGi@Sx6U3s)7 z%_(!P%{Uxw{+)wnIw;R3(CGTp^Qv}Q#$|xOE3f5f|5iIxC64QTO(}}DR)&7NW*VQk zJj(Z%nU1bpifb&ooC*HLY#`*xt`~wW$)~w1Hq3xZdVJ>UOwID)Vlk_SIzqMkLFt z)yj;=MC+DDR4OQKt|_nG3l#<&W>S$Wg}7RO7o>s}7<;!0ZE05+T;^uzxpBtRRPozz zfIB_zszt7oAnUFzWuhg~9Z!QVn?3%8prh4sO{hDeYtt;VAF^fJRX?=N5K&B+*@Vf& z4d_QDt>h`dA?MI#SfF-%P%1ibA~xQO5U8?(C=0pQ#0Hnix1pMMiPpy9>Q^eDH>?Xl zvk+TJI`Zm&+I7|7X@%zd7LYN%I%6Gsck{;REj=B1DXYLESVjDzC7dG8zLW9T*Zfh3XJ!f=88z2L_(>39!5sB{uL)fCr*GsOJ@6Z*R!0FV);aoNIN!)iYRq~F&p;Xn!^!FQY z2zczdlv`PqeS>dX&V$>6sF9-ylPYln9JfR7Lz|V_gI1LaVJ@fjs0OV`d}%`CD7`y9 zuRoAzr5bGhnA!7k>=eM(wL^<4&TA5=euX-*u(G`9$^Qb11{f1^Zq+>4-|WJC%pafKhI`lXrjA#0gk0-ID(jUPhyG|f5?;kgRg zD?X|0Zg{T#7<{HS#Yz)Z#@E@A8LL5TDswCqvq zp-hZ`DTHH;XVUWkc3fD0OCwa#KS+aiX>WTNOO67!M2C$ekYgCJYD@M&p*3i#7|kmESc@8F?$w zN~8$bPa)L0nkPB-YkRuwy*p;Dv|MP(Z@8p-)3kL=H9aQuGoj0esICO0L!@p ziEV^UGFy)zJPegW7IMjdSPW8hVQzw&zRNV+i?t~QAP9<7sKov5S^*rwHetG7pFbbpdLlYB-?&unZHkDlok~0 z_AHmF(ZWE66L+eFmC}dxV$F_7T(Sa%QVzWrhnM%w=~xf0F3B24qvSl&(r!Y@M!=Wc z336?GDku($`j~7Zxe}_;y9pQv@;pBo$YH=ZuW_qDxue&nE3P{-8bt97G@eVqlh2Tn zE%;c^#-V(WlTwpY3DbAzM`nR80j~nL5C%5z<+>$=dFb?_A!V8wWW_=XVvXatP1l-v zCYnUTLFs{|Fea)Xgw1V3e9xY}Rja(8DKK1*Y3d*m2u3qb!~aB!RGMi!l$OyMq}UvD zym}?fV`xE;FryN41-Kxfgfp?lotckpI|=90EC^Q(_M}ieFC=8x(Un>jZLqLy=n+l! z2>5@i=ed*puB~cRTidaFI<{3-Z@a!&XTsWb4c7!~Ja^}7d1lX&4F%TAieQN}Mcc!0 z!^mg^Rv9v_f~Gad)K9?erl9{AN=!J4&(mgENK?(=fEpgkGRbUiD4w>S_?LF861(=M z^Wu??)F?ryG&o}}vHl#lA_wQ+Tv8@?oYcq)vyeoRUJeAN)yA*Si>2}-r`jdTo|g}yWo%Tb_$&D4*_z>CO`d@oh-D5~LplUbzFC_GfK>4LRl@?}kZ zVb&4ZREb!+Q;No|YIZ+%3>qe*OYMla!t7Zl#Ja7pt1*ON1Kv8a|Nf&5GeBFMOPkCU z7o#I7iptt1HKLR*f3rc)aTX;3yYo1q`0`APth)I>#zD^ z?4T`2xQ;9of1*}Z!BV>RP6GAD#OVM05dPq%dG}WR1S|`6+v#ESX_r0-;3w*Q#Rs8W z3%%D~-8Hvwqbs$FP9oAh1sm5i*dw46z>$=H799sDq>T+PEJBVx^;|%?3*SbRC-u9S z`+aSyVu>7r6xhTsx6mQ&(W(}%6MJz@m3>{AxdFs{Njvmg8rjh)xS?U4gviHg?VYr#R#sb~hc?ABq%(8c^?<5bxYy((Wrt%FWNqT8oa*ExU{ z<`^gSO}HKKAnfwUk^~}F^7*dOyWty9Xu+mp)@rwK+xe(3h?GrEN(tJD-Y7qv-3w?~ z_Hg*!*|4O&LZN1mM&*~TFydpZhw_*4vEiJKW?7F{&Z z5UEc$OVeWS?|@Mx-WZ%iCYv*3fJx-BhaRIC7<&>JwAVHrA1jsOKFMQpQYC7W7nC-^S1s?ZAhhTfME-|Kd*}UJGNZwjecx3SvuOT4P-yx>^|@STY_j21dY0wLmyH$k3RG zs3=RKR}|iYw79<2K;%s4(qzzFI5sh)zL89WoF5%y0g1Ee?EWicn3dvxHuPGyrC2=7 znuv6b{kQTZYFaE@A3RH@7vT7_{)o-Jyr^A>4*X%6&zYJBfjgTX=Qep+sd6daSdJXl zmm}^%_Y?Q-1PG*q4f)`7eHdTL()n`)WDr$fX>^Fmw^1U@$rKM3X=qC8PkLA`=^xsf znN;TK0cszKE|H&)g9lo9WPLiBi_|H?2`oDX46HrF-E*6CIyvA9G>SPjZl^i7?tN$6 z35Ts`1dr#}$0XkFWN@7E6yk!M#2Q6QSJFzaHDt1nQGBprK+moI-7NdZzFKFGkPg>2 zon6hc-}4w`ADiY$zN#7&ZN40{f3{YC;21DRIcB=0?a{CoyTC?cd55oPlYu0C$S^z! zwUe=MO<{2+;^L~~&X=_!`3XgGo=V37^(ADtBjz{l3ADj!^#)sh1`3k`U)+ggzz9A< z4Hu9{pfsjWs{lHXtaR?+7#e!LSm_}N|kj-6-J2Gr6#5((>{@<11Qd1 zS09B5d|4@#meneBRn4j0T^f%3leL-r7P~{bd@a=YHr?$D`6tGD`L*+oYL&G2^@=Wl z?DVxv%bzeQy)IRVcu7*VAf*J89goBI)YGwDO0pX;dSl#O;{>l%%aaA&x$_P7E(Rk* zhG0*q8cFxMPo*fQ#xO(&K zSVCQ;4w4a>)z}x3bFRTlr7#JE072rqiz~!zhz$A}p~n@ZgdXmnLbG}s52n9-TF zkjL2tKy6;|vSr-jgA-}bH0Dzk78Lodx0E(Du**^%h&%KB8<0dj__VPHcC|7G0Dv4~ zs$DRut__*QD6MU3SB9s4}IsD^%O5k#M@(Inm1krY=|PAg7>hNP>!Tex5!HPoh* zGM3Z@x3NVk{-w%nQn3=ChWP;(_EczU;(pe-0f!T$Won(v*5TiE(1EWi17fJsiu#lp z9H-wb%nJCgN6&y+Y9dq?yI|0OUdd9lkYnrj0fZ0FQHqo$2`1U@Iu zC*&ulkX7Xy^;n57xPf?X?R+-h&!Ldj!a1g07hCN8z*o(@%Y8E|kx9SrM0$Iabpu=| zrVySf%uo4e1hAGf(un6{WROvi8=hpDl|G&V8-+dVBRrLn{%_1GH5vLXxYf5hj5g9C zc&YZxvSjrckQvr}5Ga@78>J(+o? zlC+EPxQb8N5_v+pHTbHl>?Z%x207eQfvwXkNvq(fZ=whL=>>QE7%Yatuy5~!IT{B? z6SFlY3fN+IIhUEKPF^W8g>0G*I<7(Lq?xrSHUiV{0Lx9q%3H8s=L%e_ym>lG%S#VX zqsC0fJIs`DQ3e@xb}33B6^+vwkS0ka8{4wiB+7G{$(t1Fxtv%PU)L?tTK)^^L0&D! z&7VEk590*Z?VvSTwBuSnbCSz|!xS`1RI%NbTf@>)24<16Rzh3`7-{vCiMOmr88}2MB*j>!qmH?PnqVhcD$GXbCue*n-YW+Izn!=m9Hu@ffu>l{^OX+ zTLW7qRRE>N@JiVV^l{AybT0Y`{lh?{Glein(5OjH_ z1-pNxdUXr5c^4P$^o<(e0%DgGiL5_$MzGJo7ML0U_B^Y_?o5=E}#F-TUFi(-owM=~Oj%<%!&f>z3yhd5YXKu_rKxmCEl6=T zX&Zrld+Z<^8D_*pBiUa%pu5}CYFfo4*~>$}h`4nqh{U7D9CV3a@L;Hz*eMbAnPNtX zLrQS0jhqOK2E7$zpAQ6_*7{$C*{#q2 z;WlL`Qj4{HJT_(ai5Uk;9Ug7|zcLl;e0J;OPafSCQS!>G5Zf5B%okK(2uxe9MIFYZ z?@Oarr~eIjgauV@UpX6==Agn%9+sDAAsK2{4FN_y`OWNCKnp7H?=jwyL#%8Wlnc!^ z|HerGbgRpVZy<`>&+#RQzo+T#1K0@BKYjP+Kgn9mBIz7zDHq5RCVwi2KoVkvLn95~ z)?Cnr0==*J3m(HWyExL6Qt|djTQtvp_{*`e7|ACcp9?6tI(AL~AyH;D58if=39krV z(aW@JgoTs`caup`c-}wC`jS(z`QLv zj?fUhrfFBl=``AJ-FxfqySGVIEQG>ST9S$A0Ko`Dr^rnEK<9Ij?bQ0Iqjb*&b{IFO z;(9~gEk;o(a^=*je+ui4*k=ntKB-RHblQq+StfQ++F@di{4W5hNPp_LI0zR3*d--I=oP;ZeEY>gON9Dwj_ zf$XF88j@>PqT8+ywweV!rz0+Kg+^t3WY$-_5^%KK;u;0HCWLbSG&&G-}lXKBy zhLcSWCG-}tF+HcHB7+BOE8+>)=`=Mi6yI8Dk$!a4edR?=<@VaJzA71Et&tZ+Q+9{3 z7SN>_6#uazR|0!gJ1f1UB!}K(35uxB3Vv&QYq-f1*3H~3z4ms5#euj>1`0pVI=pf4 z;tM0v9Rsl!Q897FjZES+GX8GUhtdrsDOb4P1x1S~B_?S7*y(v%s~1BYG_F*o$3A8< zM%exE((e8WbP1I^$aF%Zips09Q>Np0%_9N4sDBXQJ+-1Muwak z^rGwzN|I-t(rvdost`2hd!JW}?wbr<5twHe<%Cq+)&@VL$`O|!=Ba|=?JhTB zE9MT+A?p-Qi9rl`A!>R{MxA!)hCoo{nsILMQQg!Y(obm@`lePd^tT|;Vo#;d!S}Oj z12HbsF6E{4aIx2=%jwkd1A~^3ScST29d&) zbP&Ew0H_a7m#|6_G)mNb?oG&QSjViDy7%Gl?@Vmoyr?cG;3 z+_Z4Gz^sxlG(ty9^25Q;*Th9#Ue3Pq9n|GirsW79`v8efAFEKnvdG9aXCY93J`lTB zC{d?!s3`s|Z8*%Vo72LZ=XRTR70KCHBhMRAs3YVER|^73{1G9AbkL(^JGA!F*X+o3 zhRm1YZHK2^Z2lbtjG$`(_Maz}5KCsh!`PEgfUJrS5x8i4wgixRoJJLUPyD`J0H^mE0(JDCVPV7oUBcj(;@-hOMQ zyOISJ5BanHHGjp{vyl<${){Hc}l{-`v~QR{=16h z*c{9`5>`)5R6s-b1o(1v?6%%adul+&8$U%_{0dBC412s_9%c_= z9^C`c4OlE>cTzcz9Ry)hHqCfVBCL-_)d6Axx&djw7;ex_!0w}h23wB3%Dp?S* z=~(r2i)#OV+9JaLcs+I1|FL;Vs^H~+?HK1D6MMFz?N^w|LBN!g#j{KYS51AhHl1pR zruy!Uy}>6V&L1a{Y({IJ={`!GFKqhm;l?Ip+Q%(?OHS?6sx{^)N@jOF5b(=<7kJEmIwL>5XWdW^+aeKQbEAL%eKP zt)P^hYS46g+@&7W*C=FY6E>RvnnI(u#=7itupg{E=uxH&Uyl$tk|f(HLT;Lc;A5mZ z*GrCu-%s0`0e^s$55{#m#xxllZtJ!QauQ+73lU)!w~fqvZsaOxf(lNb51xX8(%Z9Am-GkxY?02L*z@QovyRfY)Gg z9}sx>%>BBf1Px!H?VTM`l7M4U1rPuSb1DTOIcq0vA=dPv{~93y3`#LPcPDLisve+_ zdQ##&xkXWw>g1)o#lS$6C{AjBLcVeZ_xHuhy1C!jZE8cTACeVHJ*$WE$~tN$2|H9* ztk@!%4aiJ}eo3oM#vgrmehF)Zl*!e@x!6lkK02H1oE4#*z!5xBe248lm6Mn|FwhVVmEL)uR|ss_B_-maULYAS}j030%RM$l~+ zC=d@|(ue~U`X841IZGT2bC?Cs(TXb5#bcp@B6xsv-k0a(O1YS;zkg ze`-&Khh^Bn7-EMe8m+l({jdCp=m5FQaOP{40IGcm6kK=|jDzL5YO7Ni1zB)+j9E~J z-%A<}5!Naq+Itafn7QF9BKa5&NrX^IZLkR%jFs5f*CZVJv_UclafQT~>jYW-6%PVl z^%`8nuGmY{t!z(|!QX7~!iJ3x8tI zdjggn8EnO{IW+(p$X2QiFey<{hk0G;=tceXksK%T6)Fd-aYRgn^V@^nZJt@Ht3R#A zZZ&o?K8cA04h@|EJ@S>&yljz{_dmeV8S@PIJwa8 zxS6`%S}w{;H+g;5%kcf?x%POSVDCk<_0yr*82}$BZg?i&MaLq*#O9LA^rWq7<8+k5 z+@POUAVo(%#f#V%p(#?ceB#Oq5th^s9DBRzCb+7s$U#1WUOFjMw~YQdWiv`L>412H zOKvKcInyAlNf99Ka_BaH!M!U-yYF+_Y^JV?DhkEq7NdB`##B)gj=x@Gorg+UHg#5Y z)iy-t_3o3LOYejmmBGJ~5kgKg51*qM9YpU9GiL z7`p0s6w+v8t!4=d$sM;g;V?4xsWvl37@<@Ja`zNqUr2s;|aq zIPnws5!*=V&TsG7N2q4zKCN?4+olCoAU`L`3V;lV&J=>IGubpMx%K#CX)YLeH*TIa z(1w`665lBV=>$b&Rl1!Ji-Uw>EkYtgh;G&@(m|8Op`Cn?@LWdc5lM{Tr=vi;7V9Nm zbEIX${FNh?QcAE~_DTu6=`i`q-#}DR@8l_)@DfdlV@c}eB?nf)sPr-yeaC2Rulnd5 zx9xYUy!-Ak9HsrGs{H%EyZ0V^YLl<*7Wwwuug&~(V`Hvn@$I+Ye$y83+kkh^}c;%FTd~yA6-ys z$!zZKI^Iy|FnTq`LM0!Ywo`L-uwF1lh^OPb?@Hp*FSh~*Xwsbc=w&%ufP9ZbZzb$ z2DzxtUmQ-HH6r?etiAJ*r2kMM|8+n8KE8n+kFEH)wJA}j+wkNg%m}*gFUUsd|AKz! z#YW|uYCuIqjp4cd6n&lF+|j;&%b($JWc0<$BkrH}9XKRkYkEJ4ig%o!UxxMExvKK` zZ&uZtsr-C0`LZkd!Fx9==~nU~w&W|Xr5Kr;wLI@UUuiMlzuB06F(0py@?qE&Nsdki zUurvl8N8VDWo`iv=cpbs>l+kySHviSFFNL=J^e>)e zzux?xC1ulC$QD5%$x2Qtju6Z|!yS zLVn~kV>7^Yd!>8#Hd*OQ6vNTc0;BJxJneu_2D?n>~m76p(<%3hKtFq|SiwSo+>bR6gJD-dwi%WmIlgb;4fQ zCj9xg@)A1n*C;%GeRlVQhtpo#FCfy^tt$1B=p?W^C#`7>K%8!-m-Q5ZC+uxA$Y-bM zT~a#YXrOMnH1nJ2`%0qk$3n!!031SCH?jBC8=h}A&+FiNk2Hg%d}op%T$s<~yn$dE zE!AAr6>-Ww_xyFP#ph4uUJddp?})BBva8dOaO@_0zWP=E*rs6lNWX`flBQk12;6l= zI}fp*Mcz=O(ofYd?BbP!85?Fui=$HB&2 zAI69w`zj{%TkuwU&)^UXH{sWngkQg=j5mU>FA#{`ls@-h?|;kfoYzM_#Yhr$QD7FQ z=Ia)?_LHh}sQ)qhWW+R>3ZeD^5vS+!CJOr5_V2Ni+&m9AM3oB|#{Cxc<~Z3`UCwKZ zVq6DsBk`l6N~63-3fUyqu&iFW$A1&)Oqc#sExkd5muZr+M#*qdta}_JrU7nT3OdxB z=C#vWiHd#!pL$b;x`Jp_iM#?1dlKpd)#;h2P7fg~cX&#wYS_d?nE58>%&`cnFEMV2 z?IsSok~rug#j+R)Iq~o87RA7CBBHDJO<$8@W90sJ%#(>~QCp(|Be2G6X@J-t9xlz? zCWa$RzWy8^ffzhr>}Xrx#70-K9Uiq9i1Je&(r-#pANnlsIONlg3v>A(`Om+};sSWt zem1&jIkLveN#@Oea6*Y~zHw3syNS-O{84}9%mpWiifUcU@Np6Y2l}s^1BfiW6oF+m zu90zQsaCDoE|}xS*X8r980&LnnKz-~D^*#kEfvq3zL+)rp&EyTl6alk9bG>LwQs@%5P>-nZr!V~toj;WF!zknv68 zkEL0GXkjvbLB;c-YKl~Jb0lyrFe|KDJXi8(Uoed+QCBKLJx`^9&0dn0(~+(0{bo5e zD>JViZCA8MgoomBCt8C0FJM}`nw#}Vo{re!WCxow_$F%vH~zvw;j6h>58A+18YX~_ z#P{8M#Lg_qV-AfAU;IjR$JS*2pfYnk(K7Z_u}g;VS(pd*e)myqj@h(V8W&P*V(O%)a!q7Pe@=c(W zUDso$#D{@`fMPl#a$$(%KQR+>j2)5tPY6#hEty_re7O0`3-DQ2#2NfjWs|Fw{@KY` zp@bBmMA1_LT*9h70}aXa#hhGfbi;SDZ}P_O5ywBd_w`b*lq%LS>$VqY?V;r}qm2?q zGxjc<36Pnmjk&yreWiO87-gmU-uo?9LO)X{^Sif-Nc^b*^>p@mRUeyfaeJ2J5QPvY zm7m=_U)ODQcoEw86kS*)-s8UB`=bqzP#a9YIk&|^2N}Xlwya=`kmiF$FQ9MJC4iK~ z+JCaE*tJv-u@r5*f|1V*g!fV=&%42u%nx~V6=?v*#kDC08>ZLSgBdtrpHe-kwgYkG z0FV44i+V*_ik}k_s^Mr-PFSN%XEXO?#m6+~&n1P4e5Bn&5C{fAYG-7ft;=kL@3NeT zONc~7!kz!1tmbojK}7LX)@_b`HNWb0u^U^azpZa3fgmPkbD5t7ZR!!})<6cBHzGvp zhiwr_jYE61OYQsGC7cgFfx)PR!|i1BV?u{Ct}nsq_j8^r_%V;U(KCDPb`PCc3(j1! zY%$1)g6{n^g+}9{hFct#$)bN>SalBmHV|_M^{q80O1%i{tXNS;d2PDQpT+~Qih~6jgfGW3+XiG#P1GXUT=zgG ze(mCdivFFgFoK;52Gd=6xJe+;0sS#MAb0rwr3mP`#pDN zi`70F;JkpgE>+l+XbE;-OYJ8^Vu~I0Q?gW7ZoO|s!LyASlkNK`!`uNYbqVVM;zjV# zZy9X_f~MX)JBgU+K`38A=)en!sCrWmPdmqk;y91}++fc*;IlEyxw4E)Z1ddQU-`-zx`C_T8nlq%qVI#xQJh7mLyq)XU8;EDFrx^jO` zL~162BFzNxiDM-SPZVhtVT-vJJUL_{TeL?fRsLcvo>T&Q4TL91Kf>Ca<01iH$|_+K zju6d5K9}RFO)LR6v$h-qv9M1fl}YvE?APsB;g)LJ?jt;q86G*b=1*oJ8~ znOIe<0VJT#;@nj{+Tmc(2*5=?q$TG7|2>#u*)U&k+)J)z;I}>3j{+z8*!NY|uA0gX z(_TN9_}~+b16~LR-TU#`{EPK0N9(S&%b8L*&f!re6_Ok}OiOz@w){Q15uHCPin%k9 z^Y#F|)K!*wmwQbcx~c2ZcF1hxJfi58FpIR0X7j(L9#+uC!Q7QLm;HN@5tXXvZi$YNMz(`c{gOdY_y zt{D?r+W_NM^(^YO-Jw*S3p0T2$UdrGv%Luch>z>cm`VlxzK^%OOq3Aq8__w7SD>botnZ3Io|Eyt4_TyjgWS@-CKh%9;5Bvz})lZD1 zP1bjgoxTUXCyby_7VZ+nhg}^{StN|BVHUH1%`H-*8|NPf3WD{?ruSJJdJwqfI*_$jB z0NHUFHh&pJUDwH9Lr^jA^38wzWFcjhJ$qZ1rWsfAsj5Dy-DmEFH@_&|i+A0s`Cqx} z3C?LKxl_cA#3~nwxV`({`}f}Y_U>EnzVoZQ?|<;Yd*426*OlJ`=cU}7DArzg@4Y*3 z-}x1z_pe>d7Ayl?@sIy{KZ`Rp4l!RAdj4d?yx-@v*VX$nj&-N&mf7%#YKpx`bhoR@ zb*MWVVI3_-_(%4zb9(?O?I==+R3JqPq+K2zQ0a`#lAJr0wr6-K@}=4x9}wBL>*eKg zws*3BvVU9>Vr2-J0hO}$5x%{IHLt?>g5}9rFKk4ke;Ff(f&XhJb^$8y(jG=-FsR;U z$9Z3jwJJuoU0%=h=4{qyzd9_Ry`2-37W>f#qtET@3_*A16f!n%m&MHI!X1fq%a7|y zMM0quzm%xs9}y=?JUN-&bo2;YGQKXPl!=aupEE+$vo&1PF{x#bq@2rAf+Rf6;N6>z zTycNOeyk={9ak@r^-82@U6t4_9L>A$=9S6`RcY~)dkVY(&gch4VIxg#8&sL~;3{CO z`!H&izY>=`3gHWr=anDlP3fUQ0#K5Iw+L=WpN(BYpjmY#PDQ14dc87@>;-obVQR$e zPer+P|Lfw#Mm#=c^YWc5Njl+&#o(3Mc zpd&4m@Vlr9-w3e)rRRCcxSDo8#}n(_%?mNV$)1coh9IwB4d}8U9_qD6y^(B5d~5G} zKWWobAs;Et#B@$c0ap1FfDe;rr{Fok4nmQEBF?Jp+)oJ}@DEcZbE8qiv@)01C=w0J zmH6<>08?kA^PJ!|KtFHz4+A&Chhi6hy;FwK~y@ZsXoQnU^{j3 zP{Wt-!}83yg0G@u^P0pDU)ra(JX^QgMN!ipmA`Qe zM^?arvc(QVS#_*V$Q67a;hRqpV#9bYG3kuQ;9goTGD(}7yH~~TU-~<=8g$!ZU0^kR ze4OAqUn6+I0lG)lE!$LxP9@}WQKV-5st|u_VW749(KU}^vA~%=V2xoSNxG<=V07OH zRhQXz^+54da0gOcPTZciF%XLjuM=2d)^`^qki~j%Y$|4J=Wztl`*j z_8Z_H3L6QWnGk}dd@lJJ>?+rGmW_SBKr{82DoKD(ri)1f5abD0DCHs`X%8DNVLD8Y z-AfI9COvOdK5L!G3E9!iAt7xHAT>NGHyqOMRZXGw-EdYDb`LcGvacvzWoaXy#`%pD zF!=PT|0J$s9oNBLBZ8g-(-SyMqu9vw7(a=Gi?&<$0u0U@hY_}mm_&Hx~oo5eX&{HoTAZmWVB^s&p~;g0S`N9soPg59EGpF&IOe{ zdXIvzCV|m|bq^?0L^Wjl;p4GfpvmECVo%1-X1#dNZVB9kVJH}b*+NQJfMA`CoN-6t!v0{%z*^0%gXq!)xjhBAOC#N z^NjAc-HrMn6+5JDzDox@66HHT{xu!kLTm)_+v=9-fi}-!D8z{9&+Qok-D_8R0Nt~n z3fvycjYG|E{%))fYrl}55y=Bsr!N3h?nmu+Kx)gw$9 z)DhC!m(C<2wg>QGTU(pEU?c0-OcXAa&YJG8Pgm<@-dFw4vR02b&x=vpl*l(-i7qtK z6797QU;fBn$<kgE_^!rFYx6XBY=UamVI+IzQxW4vw0lgK*x^kBBc}D>UQ^jm!+L1sHRETvMm{-1DcXOnvra6Q8Tk~UW}})sOqG%GD~^sVf)Fi=h?3_fZ>-B$H43t zzxhoK{}KO^6W_PiiioVfkd(Wk$d-UT+hSLBb!BG6igo!e(e_R2*V(`(DU#LdS5g+C zu_P#fPyiPgUC&r?s0nH|$E|O;2eQgpvFDpu*q_yIe~wRt&U9woe59~@ zSghR5F2u=FxO+epb4(*C7Elj~J805qSf{I;{--XNf7>ApOY=rqED7tsXEHxcD!KC4KboJ~an<5#Jtv2`t7- zr$*M!Q3&OB2QnoH5jah>KPP{X49R-+zA~}z!3VqreLy`YbEW0*!9=8Kt9s`y>2@0e zP8@lYgC~KUV4~!3uAx*O43%Xucsq?#;v*NkyE=#fMiLotT;Zo>zdij~g>G*<-9SOI)+ph}gurUs zymjn{e%>v8E>S!whY?tlV?=#~Q}kuFUGIyYA&l6uTGBa3zJs85{;pL>o7wByx}J9a;=!Q}!8SYe}z41!d^SEP8Y`NtZr> z#Du$q6Q9h8;pKhk+pjcyKm(({sdHAV_o~y2KX085wvc+z6IVFyXopnF|8&nWGPp0m ztTWe6yjd6vx<2T8YQqjmfYf}1kBR65C7>QRNIafSySf|w!;*wXL?nXR0wifL)S`Gn zj2w+*3sFQg?}4cWEembK8@Jtd+2_j+Nz?H+L)c#H+8i(xBgeDxe7hU*Km$P3AmDy= ziM@p$hqI$Ir9J{3EpjQ?8cagdYxmy=#d$y^1w>x}y9nZ1!7exIY99b=M&a28$2hk% z7MPZ#Kqkjt{B1w84^)#wz+1b<)k=e$gCO6ursB26au~uu1>p4Jg-Aj%uu3anK=RtN z3F%+maN<0M8H?gT5<0=GJvrkeiEK}R-L*dFn0A64rI`zKHfk=_x}5~DDlAo<3aHFC zKjhRPbj(arAnGMBvOgdk`2f47tP*tHwP5D=A?4QjKhiCm+7~#|TJ(`~2eToW22~IZ z>d#O*ismNYlW4m~V3<}%AG!!?)r&Zq)=kp55wwP6JkxU}sYLt-Czi0J>+9uoAgx`= zJ|j^vk1Uqi80E@UCX&Jeu)gnn7#-ZzC#ZJe66DR?yzpg;FmLPF{9F#4yn7)WA9H7h zT<5%Ti?ob|6f1_^y@0P~q$Idi)^L&NbqM}^N64j1PCoQzePO1UrkppjCV*Ke0tqD{ zTb~7KeWewtFHeQl?8C`DvCFaXnKJ~~0z5}a{#Qh=x#7N63K->+6{v*3kZB|mxRJbP zY>YD()Nd2{@XNW=KAVGVFW2LbQP(S>ul-nn0y(1LA=T7FBT$)kvC-qwz*zPdU$sU@ zp@xDXwM<%Q;w*;t_p2p3p0%6}fD$W~~V{8(kliB?Dv0X9qfg6^ReS zPPdda|ThndQM0k;A%R4vm{tjp?Qz*{= zggV)MH<|oM<(jF^Ue|nq@wY2}(R4i-tLS;6Xsq+~g0B?dQXOX8z@WOdFC&F!ddmzp zcZ=z)>~$)XaA*&(VM@|aP(7Ubwc#(;Co}_5-WZKdA?>Fn4Os|*vNjh4R1s98xIshl zMFlEvZA0Xg0XL}M4V0BdHpsQBUR1H|uZs80+7~!d-7LF)HBWtg1gd22Qu9m6^iTe( z$_tsZ_ZV!f4XGgqi+CwqO1CB1Zk>F=@#2s0cTs7n{^v(gaw5B|}28SeTl>;a-Ns^nK7CYg_ic?*GIxhJ{qB zIT6Yzr0Q%jT!OGrQ@}9WgZL^sYp5rxbH@r#-z?(#vZKwmbcwUGmv4vs6 ztx;ZVPi0^3oqM?(=eKDy_-D6n+;e~be8N#Skf>TpFTRAt5&rR(Bw06`jUL{R&Q0*^ z2 z#2`M95d^$4$P{c28J&>7EK3@T$>e}-W!0=ovC?7E1{@P%1WBSGAbCm49~2kA1L$t7 zM>~z-H01V9V?b$IpC=i-jEQ}@T~0yqFI}bh(WCc%_@hOl^-xa5vgs}6-&dGg1h|^WzVVg~2%9jK`op}jztA#=j_V3u*F$IUCC#er)uqFVfVU-A%?`Y+nljP8%_&zS zc57IamTKyG&j=XEfSNT!^`0a#`r^h1H z;C7^yd2XLs<<1xx3q@l>$IP{mLQn9nof8j=kGRxZif5Z5_o(<0)Ej<{_w>J>+Cs7w z6%rT7w0~F5<)D4vM%`PeBME1EBWq;$4D@H`rsO1&67=dYZ0wx{GGs~y1d~iS4HGZr z^ADDD%G$AmL}pM?3_H>O^6xbJAjRXPgD=JhhaUsoxLvTR%T9DQt& z?x=U7aunDG;Sh*3BSz~)G+7|kM<~+TXeod>R@2lQb3)LpRb}I=oUswr?y6HGRHeX} zmj_ga00Ldid_C~*i1QoXlBD{{o^^xG9C@IY6OYr(+8V~S+f%mRpQ7a2cvuOhJT6Yt zL)xiI$uNVdgdyAea}!%d1nQ2#Cl;{$BO{`OX?wzx7le&`j&}ACUD8Eb*Fyz0f>s%s z%BMlto!Yu#A{|xO#0g+V5uZ~}e3nHl!omcL;idA4i`**{5opXEtM`mUqnyZ6WU`*-^ zdLgg!1ka|XMa*7i?e!0rP)*B7%9479iGW**6bG+5NRQRmQADJfX&rw2tHs~NSB;> z)e*{Wuf9{xtSs(0xu*epDrSpR9?tI^iTui!mC|N0x7XrX!doYVRi7u6tqGt>ZBaQD zeUa{Jaqn|~I<;qXCuVGXbpI_$=P!Pzmc8r%Lq1qc;+W1?QOIJUOIbW4azj3)yO0bk z_eAD0Ev=Vh+VYX=vQO9;lR#2Tuz8omO@zUveJ~xmjXp7BuhprOiRpzh-z%vZLa1zA zQ8jr{02nP=9j|~+x%FkYWT3x7*8flw;tv)tqp07$)WsT&l1g{haHTkPww6_Hd7%l7 z>2N02Xi}>-)gEdi*M#B|`X-AUZj`qe5=6OHK)NHTEOtqq9549C>fhXJ7hNH&L6uy> z7Mkc#pqcU-fh4w7DS0VhZ#et)ZZQO~b(Uzi-{DJclje%SSH7J5Em->PwQ0H~uu+p( zxP7(Fha#grq3aVRz{_*-=<2dkdAf@5aWsK^c1eKK`vsv{1XKZSCf><|o6sI7ejS#w zA|tJD^oi&Rj>`%7GKbW^w-o&hS*W~EfaOqMKyM2W`B3kv-pdnbU&Q~1zXi?|+HyM_ zB@Vs*9{am+fb-B1Z#S|`lZ#B%ATA^2?_~aU3|pXxQ$N5{EvG^OzqDKcO@SGr3MaTd zffC^wC1=)9V&T^-(P{T`BNtMvxxmzGPJtjTNp^Rqm{ciCKjfn_HSiwsjw>R#B#8zKy!G+_>yxY{0u@lKr>e z{YUFVmGdPuSa5&)-GAoF3-ha!rkhDKFnf}RFb>me%v@6^M~XVIOB;k8MDh#rJz%wT z#=OEMKzpjT^lpP8sA4;=DJ&%+rBPC!k}>yKmsVKDy_R`sMyhlN&EC~{TW&MDjma}E zM~GG@`cR9+sCKyI*cIZ{P?Rf}VgMk3dGXr<1o^nZ^~v%Yaqg|V&{}9Pwk3y-DHvp@ z*-lQ4hgfIzruWUJDom3arO9yZ;n(G+iWn?#G9iY~S?OkitTy#8J9}?m>~B7<&YbrI z(Ol78Ix~yt#1nA8lm!t$XC&Dj@8@QAQDTrgqon(T-x!(h9m8If>32F1kvldrz*R>1 zMty)prVq9@LZ0wR1ca33#~1@u5f2Gn2!>3eS{aFZ{uz<3AJo`$>X(5!KF~v9#v2#( zvV6}~hyH~Bu-tPPZf&|RnHG8^!ex3|27cf?R8hiZzpQ=q+%U|hN}IzX0TLs@5|h_q zYOny;1F~2KU9mXP(HHSnADN(Vz1>O8kjgchlwf9pK*t9#7^fr3LuS*$EP-Of>Kp>f z?ppmxzq17Y7E~~2?orfGbZr6o@IkbO7V-RY1>hPPl8tK!)4b$%g* zi0ZQ+>J7vlfdnE=vF19!rt`N?w9OR@CP=%i9i$_k6*GZ#)yJidV(k+<(ZE)1j8h+k ze%s~E=Mu^FV<9z1=jq? z6+!I+qnYS@L#mrt>Pmr(9lA=1ZLI`Lf34V^%L72#KX^-0U=<@B!wAui6D$cu5lW_O z&IbxGRoJ&QK>UZ5mosH{D{D}IfFoXZQ{(s;#4#e|OM4O5e|92}oGM9KQX`!d;(wSF zD$ZZ^@)x#zp)Gad^CCnAmFb6~lzR>kvkx127kCx*kKc^O<_z_b@lIS5()A2+Y^=B4 z7SHv|sjHti|4Pu2Vw(fVl<5LNwXQd zVB2-Huk-Yq7met0M)xi2i3}V#=%5)smO3 zxocV#NeetBOucyxa7@|L$03oJB8-7{u`Aoo2fvrf#T`6J#R-mpkhEB3-q4TTrZ0D= zIr&09JVBIa2v&EdPco}c1JIOgijRN!^rMd!{(nCDaKV3k{^_Fl@biy8ddip8HdF|c zAs4~1=+|Nsbfc=i_DS(tqH5mbh-j@fQgMP?eD0jdZWTD|mRe^x&NNw9i`C!+HJHwr zHnxk47dyaVwsj&Q_M( zLMzhK zQ;wO|5)ZPiarb2U+-4L-qfQR-E#eLnE7tX+Y^3n8}zf?AwdEC4eN#5&@I4u87+aX&dJ+0B$h8Wl&l5l>Zz{?nd^}e2aQ2eUJNQK5= z=>HN(iWCQYS(R$)`Z1#c!7R}!eX@vde_uQ8JfHcmj%mGCSlJ31Rro~uJ(%5<{w$H$ zTZbP;hv}k}e8<|x6yd zYL?>aH2B~$lgEPAPS9_Ig@P|M*LfO*H%_-8j3GzBv1F}N7@G_RizRr+@NT+C;UjR5 z&uT|?Qea3_snnk}RmC;Tm8}|E_x+DI^)MWVblm>+_tQ$?PdeMk)see;YcEU)OmQ44 zZEQdT6aO065CfH=pNk5HZk~|X_EZTgzo8AakR0^KU)Dj^7Zoc_Dsrvmh*%K*p{R}0 zsq*5_yLtqxgkVM^w*edJs=8I0eM5_~R%>YX3|UzZij`5k4TzoT4sww+Jls-_%8dI{9W&Mz$&G{P+D z^vTwyPrgxRSe|6Kyt6T3m2CVFb7~~F=&za#9z?s?FX8x@^FY6k0x@@ZHA#Sj?-nG+ z0?v}92_$Z={h}5|Sm&lpr%r=iqrM)ho!YT;6_iXv@yMH7x04B=i3lskcA61B>n10g z0S`cfTwrN&0vu_(GZ>2Ejnmf5{Gt( zc|$JCxG&F@kR-T2KGDzkWIp0|HJ}fV6d#3zcA8ymgMuF%&mtA7??pm{6YB@!B&k1hMY@gE?tu%dkpq!9r?Y}Ml}ei`8acJ zKL~d{&&f55ZU_MEdnAX#0d@xVf_skO>ElPjQT3-tQ#*DF$cI2fLBPkPSkF|Y+&I_J z1^Nf0X&(T^Vs{h~%Xh8|a`xQG4zr20@l?$lpgx6A#s=%Bf_y*TS`^PsQam z3ve9Z=C&a?N~!Fkv9hT2Y>x^)pM9bqv!ZxYq? zq*sN9Yi+?z&kl+WZ!f;eM_~W@Pqs5j+xhx03;yVwW*j1tk8awTkEB<;rkqBfwCjsX zBT-6p6Fx9#Uk{vd@RvpWj_-)>ALhvMa_#(EYO@g@FXNT0J#xCf1h7_WU`3JO$ozMr zaFO^~srM^RC6bvb9VG=(I$X-lw6jV&+uF5}J0;;{+6n_4@X6 z(zm1jh#V_I0=3#`YcqZZo*7ZxeuBE%?_(mMoyZum6`t6~qM*UJENW)(0`jx<;2GYZ_P6=R>K*0`j=ayyLiZL+%xts7W zlD&FF>b?})?p*0kc1D7GUNw_H%Y9@;r)V0oUT)4S?cG?L*Ih>Q-Mkkmr^5bF=q_Gq zL{PdJsWH#BJ}AC0TcMuz7eiNXTG#90OHhEcShblBWc5Hz8@S305ecL&vYMhQGPIq1 zI65tt6iQ=ly+X`)h3P`HB01#q$w{pea2LiDf(eXyCHRlbw zlGr)-izcepKRD8%b9U$Len9YauHoqaJ(qCIPs$EVkGfSDK)&IHjv67Uh3%z!^Zwy+ zDyC#h8xWNGfFHg0lZSu%-S2$@_^`P5^p_uh{Q2Wg7scnFe(VoLyOt-9f1dmc1EK)f zxsTkQw%ZV9(-dE2+p>GH3m!8#ZM2|EtFdA>Y^GS!527)UyJ61hrcdi5BsJ4jt7=W! z9}i+%;%mH8S9X75Z2dn}?I@_DCv6frReVftQO2scZ_hTmT3GM3|B|FDz{5y7qT~HB zs>qmCIo_+{+0@tm`*$aED$1>=P!b^n{*nh7vQ@Gm8q8A1Q@!7E2KQp+{I+nIA5UYi zW9oWbBv6QJMaNT3mYzPgBZWv5RiKEn9_Z2k!}~HNqLpkGhv=3c(y9$7b>7uTmg}sI zdf%e4>TiMg{?4nTys})G;#mR%%8wv4q)3{X28?H516`)}r3k`oE!ZR6qCHHtf`}m$ zX5%x40FjWLdw22QR3wBdIuz4KggvSe_B_1G`*?<@vXKefc%+2WiBMq(}xL;DAb`PTDrahDxq8sWIY?< zfIuNoAJ|=?E)DyDKJyH}oX+6Q5e&=K2N?;#iT}izG|o3Ant-)@sXv&k@g&FO%#_8a z8Hx#@1}n)VZIWv2%kaiN{QMNi+7t-+Y!Js$)G}^8q`@QShWF$E@zv^AWFLbL`4bU* zGJ&fEC)&7Rz_1eWo`kR-D~`)LaoX~{)br&WYj5ZVenK>sRj5CutAWiEpZ4f8ya+GN z9s1(Wsf9(+(_3Th5)p zyR>uS*{Kc%8HXGPUj;KS9lt$>^ENO9wUmvjN2KatzbPip3?MQRVsTSox+-)qh*!@} zB=)GBFqHE4W3W7Y*>)0Jrx@R_w7-j20)lYw=jvMaZ5^_Fk_5i2{ac(B`Lw*Oth@W^ z8qduo_%t%eTGvK3pDQOQ+j6OWso_EKcq*#D{@(mS=78jx&}-HcU?88&R1A`6d4Qzn z8mgr){I^R=4rz(w2IG&2 zAwWfBkrQ!uxq9rEn;u$_S?fZDH8gDPN?dug#b8BrDNwmF=*V*YS`CL!fC&(Ety(qo z6mBEBECMT#Mn_XFJIg2q_^V1bgGmobK`2@>mH!&NlNzfRW*L*H$(Zc^C0WBo(7GMM z{8#+7{rgwl$#2|w3%H+ag_ITG2vdvbe({w|P?E-R?m-@G8ME1H#;}Ckp@HWGLlGe< zVk%3aLBUG)DjHPwo5YWcg{eD1`%2lR;pb{uOWxqekfg_|04j)Rsq^6c_*o5RQ}KB> zlw zSKx?E`eUedjAa`eV;S$v)n9!;>qp`35o&bQY_;omgCN(WFLjU-?TtHYKfo9cPl7P< z{g&Mf(g0jRA7wqak8n*PO+4Ik2<6a`4XS=JYP6WHB2?hNx9Kp7T z91~p8`~6nl0L19?Qbh!CA;YepRw7u2ai`D4tSkPNw393yb#3AbtSM|ly)sV13~Ly( z(hUFv%n|F6tqJUTU+QyV3NG;f^T#Rv%Flc83H6KPiK@|6J`Yx4L8IS0JOH%kFX^VL zgjsr9>HRMyZqVOEl>2j{5Q=WgVn=Lf;p7eQ=|$ zx|Pl}jKLA7)IP=Xb$3MU9b>R1e1xnvHALCqCH z#E7edqh=zfTbkuz*deRdFW(dKXdxNMe~irDa`QZ_D<=ZB0f6Mwx+68@jD0{Ka7IY>R^FjhfSpkpF4p>~8i@ny$CsS4YtZRJvKm3NySfA*_ z_~MkNOx;LQ_oMqk`_`|j?Y1;Uim(4vnA>e%t4IoDvjmLOcETVc;SW@IXC5BCTTixy zr8VR-tHP}WA<;99q`jPtYkblmY7|i$SVVgfcd{*w`1PXUJvP)p15}%U9{j+3Rl58g zNky(lk>o9ZrR}{=`swRCYgam-I;bIBb*CL#H+?rL)D*o0Z0);xscLNUTvYxcAF2{9 z{W70s{A`xPIezfe*2%#gZB)(-yNmY=pH-X}TQ|lzvT2@~cr<2AY^4N{O#m$~zf4-Nr=WC&6t%ZK&QTXL|OF!}Ltfbf%;H4gLkSftkIRTJZQADr^*Nf&-># zk-uck)$JV)pNrje$>i*u>;w98MM%+ELG5i4ix)4-c1wp6Dmp<5`Vve(c~Lh@}*_1+Lm4y#R%0D{*Rb2L9Ou3gH8 z3;j~*v#_<$0g7bxG|z;YJBu$B{jQ#pW;O~%|4;t{Yb;;c_{iUuqrD)%R8e|;-wfpzdBoWlL+tqEpGs-{NIDRIS)B1$R)-F?YVLZ1Fr*r$kB^tfkLtX8m zsC3Wl@!Mq8nY5Uw^w<O3kC)W zL(#FjX&rY{Haw#J!#o`Q?RWoi%q1_;Fz2oK+wcA}S3cO%FAP94Y0tt*cZjXn{P1P$ zZbIio&~510jn$KEz)|8Zv1tXs+{pfwHg`2D8^fPR!})gEH5t=^dq%ZO{dc-cOd11}G9TV1 z0bZ`74o(D8#ga1TL-gNG1rk@LdtfbnT(n4nKu=2?Vj-krfU8{R1|e>09VSS5+YD7w zSMHp&Fa+Ka?YaAe>5{e5KzBu8*k_6LpIk;z$av-t2OqckZt{UJS9V1>E;?K_gp~sY zoQ*+k912@XzB7NUfR&Valyob<{);NHbGi6W?K6ud%i>hlrr?pvs84r*(;eHmDFGPc znhPSBjTo|XQYJ^T4@OgcBI0Sdjo`s(Q&b>RGC=TOTq?|gVC!dY)c;;b?IfR4s1KCS zrc8{gR5L&S=@8u87!>!ePT1Zru)J`QqQe!P7ZXD?VnureJ_06M3JI7||CyVjXXKFG z)=ftF!eR}*gS$U8`j&{|VNb4n_{>|Un@FRHw1B4jkA3^fKp4y}b zqtYPcB&&KC+P{7?O*GzcQ_$|_L=iQf?zAj0ko{vt5FfX%`FQ=RmiB)849T_xA8R-; zGjRlnsctO!~f0ZoE)lVX@N@h_mri2FF|_z&;p7WQ92S%lhxR|%Zbzf}87bkrAR z7G9;mlH#Z0p%MiRC0SV48*^ls+N1_#L*fKbf0Vl$r;!#3Hu$4k*@M1K!Q6 zEPfnSG_J3{tYFw2_(55Vm!$PT2q9B{n%@on*aF}PD5JzzYYQY2e~evNb(^-%iE`GC zjxMJhaI-IPdZEwl&Il=U`|&t&VJ^R(z$q#bZk(&>9H7VX z3c`Q4tnQaF=9jB(7{YMIhEd5de{n~RHS~(pc3EW3(mvs?c8>JQtz*0olID(D_o6j$ z$o9#tM~atpRt}C~@~3E*O=KiM7Z*Z0DEvQw8AV&29-tJ_nN=0SjB;DZknDW&pw%gg z6dAjT&rFsgJ$I}Fdqq4|D^_OO877m5NjHp0N#iY<2!+@E(FnB%@xhUi+EBtS!O+9B zVoa}j?bK+856YBPvFDimMSe7+^1ox2sKbP3*AAoPDTUBM(NOS2=kF$S+1LnB8|% zb!x+Byx(tftlX}?A{Ty;NAg$Bxp~CQbmzsnpj}A-?Pu~zq-A1VMf#Q6AfjpIe^H}j zZu2}fz)~oCGLx5c2#hL!ox+_o39ti{F;PQW1RRk3;%n4uHRDVr^JhL}tkALaIq*NZ zvORgykaY7I)Y*GTXTI{?`)Ip6Er)ve`_j6y_}oR{`T=guqxXLN@P4MvlRx2K2%b${ z=wtUrXv+>@G=Zt1(3RTXMkoX&P6N(Oq!XN*`A|;ix*^}9vPkAbWhU|0U~w)Iof5z2 z{i~a{q-M#D3O1HU`S;CPCn^1Ge$W^QZ+&C~4QzNIf)vB4OK+DP$Y-tsAu;ydX5LVXh<> z(uEDhlzXGJXU5SD=ROjAC1S~_DDolY>$WQURx`2zjQdqu2v-eU%sx@#zD^P38!kfQ zUd5-)V?%lSp%U}=7W>R#%t=E&D0lilg+B@en1G7uqDq~%e&04#MzX4IA>tNwJ7_6x zcBZM|MQ~SnP<-aY5&-NA4cK?CU{hzzQs$e36N$2NN(>7Qf6=p%6pOc9l5EAPKYC1D z8$b;cOV3`nC8GFTpJ223@8u8NF_dTiDPg&fWgpXAGhzqeq_$nw%^21uT(dA_hN`KI zlx%J6!+GNQvwbxc>9TB8TY6LY`7rjsT)B%srLsiRR$8o=K9@CTwcrg zQ<9JGIAt~5sAN#Ekw+nQwZ0>2mfqt0k1xu~o;(2!Fge#t0v$-f zHY!-#C|N-m9g+eIMdAQC{ndPn59<}WpFf9Gz%dFL|A>8pRh&+kxQ&MZBKb>y=i#G= z_mQD~>Z5k?GuLnKY;9AV`vU#FR_!e_o7i)f9v!!FbB88Kf`W?OXo5De_#2 z(+}gfs&L=c%bjbR&V><>2x`e`GNyUO*|aVswJ|kG4kj$YSr}THkZO>V-5*>c7&-Nu z;0)}`%@KV{%$DXS4r|0cFDYvW0C(a`5Kw_cWVbKXCB(lXU|f^!Tv-8&YEsY0w?*k8 zhoIw)vjmbZ2nEuvK06sXWrMlcF6+?yqgTHh`vW2jyeOVL{`sQ#jCw$jvFU35`X#9# zKxE4%lw3JyGQ|}#>ah|Ijh%iWF%rT%yca_g41 z$c#|>W9jE9Q4b_N08r&6U#r$;r}X3$iZIghQyegDDXL3gv>}?Lvdqm55Zd&$!4|5n z7e@CA$k$v)Q0@!Xwk2jED;ha(Yj`hZJ92YhZ=x+J2!<&ex*JnC8Oh83nRRe#U)r73 zE746lhWon$Kxc+5>i|B@6~P2DfbXIc1D`mog9(LJr@o3uaZL8QP88UvqfqCJ&+XsP zyER(fCY*io)ev>pl<_VtFwJ!qm!pz!7KnU^Bp~TxXg57&pGQhiGz+L(%V7$L&z`fi zm_!p_72mTDJkm^??MdKF%59B$Klt4fe4?3vQ8mO5W^TWA7=!3~e@qeP2B8&#yDbvB zii*Lt;8%LiEG!#j(<88y7KJ&i!t_~CN;C1-g>pm5Wzc?!*t`Tm1sSK@ZMj}9d|Si7 za@T5g;ghOvWb*Cv_=25nOT;lmi~aL`L4~XhB-NmbSo7epdw|tC<5(qfQMSxfwuHmA zUOJ$yWLZ^^dl0GPx29@2YS9wJOr%uEv?JV0?RszL>VlX2VAABds{W|gsKu1%L#(8T;6K(W!U_V9NmW?|FE&}U&1)31@$W%s?4EvLPVh}v6 z{YA3mKw7>M#EH+?L4n18a#U69#d+lzkFG(+2B1nW-t$s81)eIJ6EMz9ER~X9bv_^O zZD15IJFF+P2PIf&!~A78gA(Dgg!(6`E8sTjVHF&+inICvQWwRC@r*>#k`-lG6-&Oy#w@YY+;6Zc2*vyO?BYOa%y$~i@XDGCW z&K01)5rj|vN8sn2y(UDv4Mt!h|(hK-&&`0dYsb$F;Q5SEd z65@@<5i8gCa^^zQigJ!>6U{DH#I)hGG+undE69#-XDl4G)uJr?Gbg+#eETvVvl;ED zK+ceEZR;x@qG6&6#+?671#CS&teH8xBwt;1L!`!~_J!Hy+qJW5BU)bJ8Xd4o4^nh? zF8(qaIjvX7;DHq2u4@VZ3SLb<2N0qiJsII+oI_&}7BU1;Q8g%; zj13p@6P;v%mNn?FAh?4Oc?uBhY#{DZ?;5TZgyfYq_I1h?U|E3}Hjo7L3$k+rw?KNykq5$wG74xQhLWjX*N&!M zQnbkEuomn+f*W7k)lE0bOV9!|#5(RewUSkj8|EnTmu7}yxf_?=ZmhSK!j=uz*?6i_ zx2tj|NWOIN^ME|*23`zH|DoC4IP39B+>dW^F#y{bN!JLTjoaH(k-v~*i zAnIPwC9h-yCi<}Aol&4g6~!^zDh zPv!h_J!9=O>Y0*Ec2{9!pXo*%qZ5M)zBBNmNIAO2-j73tulb74WS_~nUL-ghA0p6~ z5OFU7lBm{KV&1GM(iybDhU@95{OG3vgfLu7rj^Y^--ILJ6*a^1+#^bA)d%o!ySvJZ z?iGsmg-#Zbs5T;GC|(j9s)VZ(h$&9vyfA_QZB+wSCX)BU>0J6<{MB%>nLvz()@hQ2 zA@@au8@o~C@M*X0HtetaZ3{|2#iRi7BrGbl$8$GqgYI!EkD3uJm=_$W%2hsS_9RjH ze=QH7sBj(Ffc$cCi7+)toX<_UWpOp~wFJ=^M49)M>>d=KP(dFJV4_l(W1J6BKSIVI zs5t5!0Q#!ehB_oXat>y4-v3~cMciC5|F%jtkG;5TDXBErIWG~2)9B+Lx_dZUNtfd( zt@T@Hq_rFf^h4@ezIpoh*GlYCnT*wvsYh?iXO0cnnR0~;M8Lz2zQVHWaxU{6)0LZ6 zjT${A6#yfQODd6E5pO(pmPd`?2+CVsSCJfS7Ij@4{4pJ1B<9%^J!AWpx|ZN1 z_(#*FOTPYGv>>SR(tMGPw3%PnbO|$^w49>%(_ep2)U|ola^;9zT4Eucb7!TD=}0J< zk7_SoH1);+stY|h2?Ef;h~UcS!1%>JbRgFFNW;C*M#-Bj!mllX z0LVt;Fr8YshoIGbfQ~>9{EZW!jOg``y@_2!gEj*}&xI72z4ZP`bbTFfY7G2u$(jEz zR64+R4@drj{shX~NWp3g@jpCzLm}}Nxg1wB9k>$Kk9ik*Uu|IVnahfqs0Q@Uj2e|I z%wGJi@L>>eSysS;zPs=47ZP_)$0n{3**cY|enc32OPv8lZ%s_;5Pw z{7-UgjHrEO+ihzp1|W4Z)i9sukFiXBDtHRm zB5W$B!lc@m@a3FWWjZEdWdeg)aE*sh@LTPrK2)?6*( zO=BN~E_W)HEuz00psL+?+IA-}NGmB-pjErHs){-Mav|tMMfR6e4)k}j>?w>>_&_S` z7Wuun8f zIm3VuZIrxqvZ`-lzFP@ zHq%Z`bxq4qU;nJ1+OGJFI+JoQ(DMp54=b0d-S4%ljANF}C!_InoalHjo@N05q z>nnj=TJLqdvL;_RnJC_q?b2+AVgIM>b1e4RdNM~L5O+1+cM&}Xf@&kRVF zccjrY<+AI84n0rfD9)o~bP*hl^?k17@{@UP5WOR2zz2foXz8d40Knsm%YK8*c~otW zB}MSJNfcs*v+gqhVYCj5%X$th0z%hx|CB((>pJx)~BIo4(@FSPz=?_ZG$3zz5iPJdT%I;C*8_tkp7zM zBdE}0$@!-(NaVA6Qy=8wub&US^XR^I*?wM9YUH1~W!bNaL{=KjcfxsC#P7PkBMW|r zVh(A>YN;G`?f^dZnM^Gx?7pZ@yZU*-HHo8(#+W%5*wm_$udR6;LDGl`ap(XYfKZrd zS2BSv?9D8clO`O@VOL{WCQu^m@3$m#`#CBW+TkXRAAhUUuFE1xVs2m+;8v&tO=e7z zdT<-4P1KPx)dfiV#ejq^D_F4VKw^Pf&#lBFoQ?5gP8^1F@{=3X%Lmv%xu0w z3-l5|ELUgDr(dq=c00qPyXSNR0j7eAqVw`$VQ6IS|6syk;jt(i3^_z*TP;L)XtODI zIHk4{!&hDWIgvXui%t!xVh@d;L{HZO^)}D^ymn!9t2vwxVTUoYx|Yw>cI}A?fX`Fg zp__&iK(&3buYD_;YJfo_r6TVB!i)z+nJ2sh?d7S3Vh%g;K80SF+q%Kp6FD>MB2(xL zrmC7Em~t~3KHxGm5-{=Fz>(`qXD-zpVk~DWo)R zU#jPR2;IE_gJhK*GnSmv33D+m-{)UH*_AtSfs*gyYow}fkeEG(2ub*+u8k{=C^s0F zST-%apE+vjLGhu0$9tEE>P84#&Kv&Q4wtY|=ka~UU$*=G%uRYLUEho9B73=ztXB-e zSXQU(OR8@de~kMG0dD+eP>zj{MseARysN0A)$z)Or;ZUWpdJr-f|Eal+c(L z_WXgEE9wwP@GbWAv+V&Qbjr+Xig-kA@TE&Yie#ZKyMAS_MS?3NmY-9V-kk0#h}HLX z2P_Q7PzM-&s)Zl+r}BCMmlTC=R654f^$+l$Cchw0i=Rzn1In+@Q~52yX-a@a%9eEv z$8N$Z>MnVY1hc&avZbt)iq z;)5ksc3xuPbO4;r8ce{sxk9c0M?g+bcW=Ed2FVa|Fqy-SWa4ExP=rt^L?NinOkaG` z$y118y}}xDi=^%3qqh;G{Q>3L76@Tq?)~ro?SIw3QlW>Se620HcKJso=}?~ssekWb zSc%uOEplITB9U8&Nv|nF=URzcmCtZq)8P?< z@n@KP!)$M6VG?jqz)OtTVK7uRQq%zs%megiatGj`0S(^?f1(3ueOGnN)JIz-OR}{r zcqB((k$?W|;~ViQx3jhX*_{`k#XwekEHSRT{R!6x_YDZ{4~wo*vkziWR$WDehN;dx zZpykXo=&^E8*^iHej&X|-V7>)pa>+^G9!!o(YyC;whf@KqrH31E#MQJa@E`Opy!G9 zfm0R!L|r~xO(X&kih&cWS)h(KGM)+z=?tcW^y>7bHmsDgMM5*j9Aa~bGJ0%1pH6fg z94t|w&6tDgQjk0}EOAS|+s6%4e<6>Uraa%V3S#rsWljBs&4$&{b|&ovB1c-a;qRHaq4pW`t@uE7%{{@;wt?nsw{lAt;NnkAsVMaM2FkCj`!X7# z1XcC}6u(dOUO~R8aug==S%FdYa5%=I%TTa%2BNe0RPcL z^9iH*Wgk3*9fSH~q2tlLJEBdRqEIxDBBCLPTbu{NDv9 z0NIs&z3KcuoT#{mZk~7n?6kd2k+%w6Q+}B_@dC`TTE)WN&qBj|CDHwiaqe37)+O~M zXOMFGUqj%D0(PRHl95MqY!JaKX{}^>Ov>{dgGI<({UFnRr)f8Lk-`_wR2?Z%*P*=E z8?eD%1;?37u-+PM6t2##a%Yy*II#T5)TfH5JxvvZECNUAaeOuiOCTnB%+Y;GjWGgZ zxf3ZLz?m6Yse3V`(O;w&-?;wy)pzSjGP%-x%xAx_>+QBiy}5Yt<>b%UWv|J>KyDV_ zhK??dHQ@{hBuWmd6~+%2f801Tr<@6t`^Y6BCdXp!ihC_pgd> z;6i^v#P#r60t9R=R`AJdV?gCE6W}>};+%`lPRxiE)R_qt(m6HRcIayx&?{z4&K5UM zb^qu5drO^xn_&P1;mVyD?d6tdK@i=lCd)C^{O>Xw9HoaW`l!0%#!LFR3w=|N9tTO_I+ORplr~9AzU6m!Op*=XnxVRQ6#9EoGy-i-}!yVDO=&LtiIp zfh>yB2b~rFYghK{k%?_(%bz93*uD(ZJm4A0Mn0ii!YZ4mn*KWFH{X)u=nHEX+MIXZ zq!5YCqNE`bP3K|T8o?ur^j5GRtv;tt>2pSGGs^2qY*&Wj-T?iLsE3^DXe5a!A>_NM zp3zXPx0q@ioT*NjoLCO~YrSslx6-Z`G)2*h;@`fnmB_9a1rnfk!dJXbiDRL1Kp|N8 zpX^A&8nU0#f<@t(W}w)$WcYmIudvVY}?s@J2TI@F-{vr_QUg z#7p+BF|&>0T>h;Slwl~?3+^CWRp9-g)E%GEQ!j#1Sxi%5B{{=9-k1~Z25t7VlW zA+0~bkVM~u>+8GsMK9p$KKJ+AX{$a%{5^m7^W!7+Ma0|yuS7GaoKgh@!Rk>Pe(8ce3G;Jhwr`f-uL`} zwf<54!}osu>(AZ#A6>bs+s&_k{p&Bf>W7bh^3KCwKYI6vKX~`Y@4oZ!JzH)1K_9iN zTl?udKYYa#+n$^+$VeMna|Pw@gxvhqKluFRXP94W!C}R=!*J!Q7?+Ly zkAD2J`8WT!|NS4n_uh|w@MApV@qFiR(&~As-}PB#-)+Ep(4YF>`S8gw0A`-WvVj@|aAcR2g5SH1lG`S#U85iK@P`leqh~*V^phXGch%3YfB&N&U;XnRKT5uveTPxLR3E+^ zcA*a}`hdoM3K2cLsgnQS{`GI^7rNrHRX+pFwAY1s_82f{`+P>(KKup!%HCvFUitx+;(B3?Qf-rAuz;Us6V`Ff6XH76`SY#@n&9mOXb;rcT4?!dwk`< z+UdZz`|eQ5x$jLqLf@jN@H7#-D=Ml!h~mfs zm?}Wn(Nd7EWiZVG`J`O+__fX6hI~^GJDem>aZ8fT- zi0&I~KF4lVuE{!uiN$s)E?dd&v@* zKl_LBZ1NAKa+j=!;3?sHQ|UB~#w|7)2dDvQ@=dnRcR9lRsZfMC0+0z!-1Qe<4JVrk zOo-yAz?@xt)ldjv)t&stowtCMadO(gbOhGfKYaIZzx(|=40kH1S3{{C(D2_ENIixqDI2&MRJ1D=H*H2WklUm%hG_07+rH**^uF8NYF%OqFlW>)7y(}d2xOq_orwr#Lhth>)b{TfI(?TgT+>%j3@iEx-Bff-?gjqy z9`TTCAGv%AcUBKmiatxN1-o78AIo=bg}?u~e0cE!R!i(8d>mT|Kb@(l?EGzaiF!5= zMjt;`feBUolAgnfJtbgcUYb4Ne+2jN_JFa{t9hHg_qB<^lYo?36irvRsuu^DBlBIg zu98CZhN-FyO4`6eS3STDT}53`Kx%0+dhtJFpI?jz+=?NE%d=lbRyVj80W*6en(Kxy ze7kxsuL_7wfN3hlP)0h7vaM$T$u_1Ypvx$bdvInRu;;oncT`)be{=5|DX~-9ll;Ch zpW=NxQxbjepq@`6Hh42;-M!^{V3S`-3064<2g~tBo`P{1v?UYt$=K!;8^oD+(bWtI zfAe>K`3kgG`9pzgBTO48e;u7_1Mz~9Ty#-s6h3Jsf@3bQ0`e@>MfR(AR2vki=CZuP z`;z$Jwxlg8I!5BZ3_oE3c|s<3;8Jc91xvYeXH!E@8B5m11Bg3H0JaAq7=G}UuqIUP z`7&PubiO%RVorGTyN799-)&4RML3M2l3zKq-U=bl&2qb(3rxN?nK31(E5`+sl2Blb)DD3;^yoc#|vrqOgGZuBu5Pk5)rIHK>#3m6LnklOU z{}n5w^Bv1R+zE3xtkpTXmx@6CoLD5Q9N~#V)nZYk%Y-&hOPrQlr91|H#s%F}~zs6sE zwxXH1#lM~1DRXO5wOCryPR*;YR+z~X1gIP|7p$p!d^PPdWxPLEe?kA0O)(;&)T-oC z;HFF2E_vgSwp>JJBEyBeGQau_@U)U_MAX#ER^7o$6ZT?Ni~dcq)vU|;2+>x;uVvfMtmZrfay&SpofN&F&;v%{+iWv`t2T=igH@vi5O z&5t3qcbVXd%p1-=DI;`b(J)Ec+KS6q3lgZvi{rpl!SF~jwwVy?* zDpZqZWJY4fugojK!31B1Me@5a7x2knNRZ`tVFM$Dw$6=Wk9u0C%kub#wZAT`C427Cy6Wr*9|#6Q|h^~v_) zzqc;=lZkrRqS!R-Fpt){v@CQknuGZnjh`*M^}lfn^U+F9t3?q6;UVXYV)Y{WiRa-5aHyJraUpuDYiQz#vp;9(b3Fe)`S#mfpZ z$4gCAsY0YcwqL9C)OW|$m6EU1QhN%j00~1|CFd5WHJ&oM9XP$DRStJl&ib78Qpb+2 z4=GMXjjKcZ6b0ZY{!(k5+*@N-MW{Lw1X$(zhXz88&rJN|e@-J7Rjm@IHuT5eF9Kvn ztXiP&2P9$Jrth$Y>FiTvSL<7JZrOCTcCBrYDfQ*w*~z=5boN#U>=>eib8=wz+Lslr zi*e`K{-(APrQ=&SWASf(v%CH^+sU_LC-8(j(fQ>*ykGpPFMyWu3AB$$EC1gx{IyPI z?Nho_S3GX(Z7HwgpPw=w=4t>E+=sQy$J8PsLYd8{<}%Bgq&;-;XGCq8C&|>i*;D-5 zZ?GKR$YSl>YFSpl$#bVnW-Kj|lGsGont5LbUIB;-_-}YRME5`((#zViw}sAP7qQpH zchD1W-%i(uQ zQ(WC=eRUYP+R4svAF{zku)$8BoHahz4aQsg0Y1_P7c`i}J}CaBmENBJ4csXaZ0k$h zNJy4t)XjP{M2^O+Gj@ z&Ba%ep8cE@5yf^qdhf?S!RmYT-cKINv-N4Bd%kPL*df&8uhZwgl~9*1h?h!W-|pCg zwOhzCXion;aXc^`L9wGu^SlS)X^3K=)1*0ddGk9W#Km4^*%F2M`8HKEOIv-WdfNtz z4I~AwwN#@-3zf?SMyE1j)was4&#G{)%4ARr|6!7(Tl7smH+87BkUyl|9{pInZ=z4A zW+D(@#v6A{S#h-`c!0Z?o|wG|cRX{IwGTw{BsqO%@EkDME<}|Xmb1L2k9}E*RpWo> zbN_hz?i}0ji&G!;hvH}cF%J?!$pYG`Dn9dAs$72GJ~N_+&abTx_DS}1`H z?6So#3@PTHhcWL{5Flre;WW%A#SIm9aYhUjOICqgG5<+_0VALEz32?r4QpXDfo1Q3 z;S~SD1OcoN|Mji(VhN7;liuv!Z6&%8CgQNWcHwrUcX9SkAC?Du(tlG z`O9(nD6pX35}B#xTHWXd_ZQ~RQZqo3nP=UO$@{FsB4?@yf+j&Yaahv+$dJq|-r~3k zh%`GulGqU-QBj+4)4Gs7ouQo~gUvqLxtUPCAzFo498xd(sFn)IW&2c4ReAK!rruxn zm!U~8r>?~Qm!;RU)O&`ZO7^_Jrz*nDog>uQNS8T$S+cA*{;(O#Tc2*;m#{?zQ18rk5k8Z}d!|EKK?F?wCFE1RRkh`}xq0!yuUd3|MwMF*n6q=Z zLu+!-k9d)=B{U8fa%4+EgwTzGYz6c*xdTZ4WZ@1-uW);lEP?3(-($+?`$*Fj^2h%; z_A_{6eFqZg6?KlqE>QCFb0cX{`i{ zC#K}>yor2W3Sb)~Ndn@2z@ac+{CO;_LQRh_R$dSybLMVoV&*(T%YGg9r@}&_(ep0M zO0(B$?X&_6;ntShRX_Y@x!~=D0EQ-iTh|Lf3e5!3 zo>b(0t!@PGN(=$}#&ARln=C~!yv?EWv4l)1lziFH>~#y*!Mfq#(JX=_bCxQ(H*0d0 zug0Rk)mg6JFo@9%VY8O67(>*Rl7)2054HfJp!LFPU zxAFpcX6;^275lbsycHmcvD>0Jg1ZWvQvQygQ)+BYYhbFpCkPy{6IX2Qyrx^>?cS_R zcLX`ZP9DmTgz7m%1BY=%|GQzKXRgf><=+Wr^r!jzFRx}7c&m4fL^0P_fl`@_<7F{5 zP(W8zQw&dlUF)@f1iYumSctiIr;R^$Q$I6CUd)mO+;Ait z81Bq6(HigsxLC_%Ws8t^@(MVD+Xf3%-ANjvGu=G)#(~`z18R29L(c%cC~-!SMh^Du zS*XaIxm3V}NAvsueA|Paq{tH23a+`qIP0=&sRk3j-dAr(k(&po0YVJ!0^C?YB@lY^|yHy%pPZ_(P$$_dN_Wtzr*me^3oU)5?nT279#s zjT?PoI;U2K%3GT<0yY@S-D!tI{uz<5jrrGTo5g5Mj))@dMow(|0L-?EfJyMmlBpM4 z`{lNq))d`Mz(ZKseb02*e_Q{X&5W%`gs9*(`r28;kzhUC-Wq6?h03`sf>&nPVClfv zz0@Z#qaE%mRvnqPOY4+#f?D1QXHW;8nX@;)B9DJN_J~jFrHJMe=!F72k-pQn_U6nf zWQY#so`KQJ&f?V}S8y_xqr{{x2&#Ayp4K2SI?>L*%*xW$YMw8?PK4Yk&oQ2Bu}jPf#O5a?+?ABrVIO!gs*5G&pGkEbwd|h~)HQltz*fGI$ zfXxy0Q}m&*`Nu+Q=jD1KowBcej8>PFRA(8T8rZ}4*NCnzXZQyA_6kl9*WcRo$F6X zY0wn<@wWV}UsC_(mc>*5QFWyp^!|Ei9tKgzomj zmoyuLGG7Xo2Z%I7sr3`r3ktP3sU3*Xy7i91n}84j z?!j+20;v6BRc=#i>U;uN7C=EfWba%arW#m7VUdf4RxdoM9;(>_w*y(t-?A;!($=Y( z?4TkqITz`=Uh*hcfPGUULwkuk)vbmVmCqBhlGF*AWn>;Lepqa4pK1w$M~~m?ikQjRDk|`UUfZBgzpviz(HAdtsCx3SuQ7v zNMieQK}Y66YeXU0L)VW!ccwG*8IJOMk{c|FPu*B9Vq&l;e$|t;`6(W!fBkV&A=xgT zPD?&vSNzhA|K9b#;UQE#xUXVq8X2R;3rIY3d8CESS_KC`<&~$?{vxTn+V+b$pG*nf zOXsFLC8)Qk`G$ zn)6;IMBuyLHV|goQ(NcK^DXXu@!7wSq%Kf+ip9TZ*!1S&S)sv$LIa!yf@RpT7tLzG zG1mci;L8e8=5PwMF=n~0L~95gb6%4lNcVn9^G#W!`}hmR!A?y&rAfr1=i)%b9$>x% zB8q$njm=anmR({J@JLi~`pG?!7=g`4jzvJ_G%mnMI1o{Nl7u{;w{5eVRKXsImSx?_ zB#rFn-5}Px2EekJQm$hD6Qr5-nJgq3`UZ{^yM^FbAtjsA8rn(Q?6kc2pEjJDWN`XN zizqGoW7C&s*e!m?y;HPXWecSVxX;T^F8*+GR)_w{yiTs34%45<#;zx#Uyv){bpKyU|Ffg3~H zR^k9~lg-6fqXM_U)%0)bv(FRgkr`CGuNaN^SSKduZd4P~ZB5&qZ1Fq{t@(XM9+%Zj zqUT<2JN%-~3X(?f4<9~!$V1=9lKX`Gx)vK27BiULv7qH)4Dps; zr1Qhv&~egKX*XqdxBl;gw@KV;V?u4WMH73aUMglgW8r+VhLehJ6i1kTrM^HosIf9L zf<5-bH;;~lt@eb@zOmpLD0w{7bkhg3)~rlmh3>Wnk8pxhK> zc6vwXjrmPM*r97`5f}U4|N8OAi7y|Lnu*>|10gLbiZ~#Z`zc}fd^w?XalQUCYTXcY z>{DIf%BXHHvtb|gb3P28BJza(>+h#kVVbg-wbbn)b{8g;@)tpYbu=f#q0$I{BD|`o zFJ1>Igwm2SWQ zG@SAB3-+j{p8Huy_&r-qS<8)jJk3@k5)qs=W^~K48Sm)D`I2~d3ZIsI*O#{xhBX`x zsWM}$Gxs%;ibK7 zO?lMvPl3q|qUDgiZ5L|U)EtV9hQcS>FIu33#ZB9nwqT5cayOm(1u|HBKrwmJlNaru zJCGb4AjA{d=Wph^=|&|YEBls&ptgd*=tuT%G73+^`Ix+-nXLY#IxVO58ltpQ17N0L zxH$kA>K!6dUpFGZ-`kJ3lUlH>wmxnRIB+N#uL95d6r&Ss{0SBFlApX8XG|V;FpM2< zk_l0;W<#N+WoZtt#u)P_|4 zcdkT40-|B*XJ+PU{2s#LY1qjDaNJg=^fS)3RFs1?isiAJyq$5r70Ejj9M-O3a90=N zn|Z0G7NM}j(>G9|xK{CMI3I*Wd1gTrOhtqDd3Lp`xgu{+FycLvi?fEid8-|L?O9L_ zY9Ri$`mJ0|u{?ox^qR-M`snR>FDoe^_&?1>vmi?22fd9SKlj9ICiEd#`f{9!~~V)hgr zRw@`ep2Q3+TQ8XjHSgtDtEc+Jd^_yO2Vtgx0l+jU8o>0(e{I@{3;8X22cp`QP zB`bM{nHsF})!k})VPS2NLS(7(CkMgO4PD);PnEB!k@kq`Le^>-lq{coF|W)gMUed} z{oSoMsxD;u*LU<{u@6qf+CypnB7K!1PKE?#V%z%Nl|Q1KH-!1$Vr{C1MUuIKZI zXVlh*gj|oFVyDwa4dC?OT4jf#PUMUd4Tpdi`p`9Q`mOaWsQ5rt9Weg$-oVe`m>|dM zv<-G!m=*eB8?~s#T7bbb^?~m_dhfl5_oIre&<>tm{6P`lbfH)VyIxc`xl6?fVBSo( zV`d(2ZLjRLaaKo-3|)M6!OC)jE6q;pb3u3&rc3p9&Dfwtp_<5<(yh_yW8lb{tQcn7y%R=vH|@zsy-lk5b{ z)H6G}$LFFZN*`9O4+mkl5nLli>tIR+16h%yPm~FKjjD`ApUeh~K8|29>V{}nTj3ng zcj6@Ue-{vbYOn)rEDFBKKDD>boPDaPQ6vL|q3B7Jn7L3qtm-E<_rXQA!EcU=#^zd- z_t{$G+~rF3M5#00I%ab0%(r-x3&+|eIcU`?2W?oMu@5S*!k+%Z$8LrVT{hCYX z5m>4_^rP3Rl9!C4lc^MIhyeJE^&icH5BV5VfJw&-TH`3PTvz>GVlrmVwG}|<1Iy|(EKmGBxMC2Hktqu4! zl(S`TYb&BLp>Uhf-MAUQ!EEiika^=xn8`>gQ{kG3Y{X(*lUW-O)>!wjkyUbV+NuJ| zvF*0Ok9dpJM5`3AO+_tb0a7Ne$ILw@^d|kfn^|NnAR#?>>Xs%Z))FuO(i|?-Z%6v@5}>INuKvLd9yrhnHZC)z75H1UVm)3DzI6(jO*w3S*B4-jfu z^w|4GPtDypV7p;E2SYf&cI3f)qrWfmMcv6+9eio+0i2b6&AY$a3#kji698x&b7kNO z&PcUOchf@4ct-BC*~c4P0}0FaQZ{pKY`*QpHFuG%QB#eo(`}Y1b+yS>(80hVI#YsZ z-OOT%TpV=0h&Vzz;w5F2h{hEl`Tf57HwU+V;rDbbq7&O_Z?>aE|A++PM z7hVg;;{o!*yH~+JiBQYb(Ke>9`zIaF8%X^(X7=oV^Q<#*09D7Ma!s*=+&vDRL~N$* z@CvY&k`U+JACFs~{ItAeb@WxX0Vx#V)m$Rfp? zp1F|&!JN$w%|6Oi56wP%N+P(r@{eUTSyM`X>>uE|ZnAA;{i~x29?kkPLwGs&66tr^ z)E4(OYoFvA8zZZC?KD`CIb+`|4rexCn4#*3pxBxI%u!m7iNSW;wddPxowSc$8)tbN z;xHF4PC}q7Tdm`<->&aIeDlA?!FlDRVJ^LBDb16r0>?mAi+x4#a%}~mZsL~8>*s1I z1Lk?%xaTMs?^;6otKRe-=1)tukFyqx_>HoK)@|$1SF~62?xLCOPoGc8&~KwLN&#w5 z8ogyE7RcIzUZ3@gx;oBQXOU^vrslo$SzD{Eq@wFrz3Pw!D;v=XAI8u@5rKMin9OZk zYXL=H^YybDLZ+eFnD;?F^>yN=$(Br@Zwi1%c1VNY1`QgU!LKGX;4@u0eLQ7hLKbnQ zG{>Fmt$CUzHe8VCu?C4C7ek!%RmX@qL@7FkAqTJmK2c>hByZ9&3H^e$FeeTO+*Iq6 zzJbalQ0$`~;&N=ulw8OV#d&Do<$aE*wEa!0qVBv(RZ`{-)H5;k&Xoj`B#8uT#f~Nc z(#v{1^-}+fHP(zJMEd~tow3~&P$qAR!Kv+(mwQFVWH7xASKUVVDQt znqS+S#)GB{v-VqL!e*d5G22+BAW6aKx#!izSHq>g^_@!*K8ze;n~+?gP`bE8DjOl* zi$fS6xA+afmG)JHHnl&j{mrX6U^ zWv)kQKi-O*ptdP_Br;b960gf<-ymq9HB?;L;kTa7vZlS9WRUCF>wyL?RhClVL6bCt zN;=yoN=_|-E&3{5oJFKpl+-QbTT{^~{KSX&(^~SkfKP%vwSRHf*V`br&L8Go-5tF3 zd`61y=~&DBDOaDeOwk-Fm=$Bnu!utJxX(I`WLhw71q%e33D#j*Z`#$@)6`4!%>)*5 z`0s;R<5fTWM&CVHU{g+!UC1v1fL_;<|7MQ3rTJ&xK7jWIhcYXxe4f7s-jag@r)fsL zQp6ft>+A^lq)qW~G){rsl61tRBvdj)_I5J(HaRI}najy%(=guM%iGmWm+|sAB7)vF z%<*`v(fPJjeHI;>Z@acOz|uc=&tNW|ee6wmS>M+Fq&nrkBBOKa_eh;S5jyp^kY>g% zcCTd@)0rU3)Ib14bvu;EJPD|*^{nQMx15TNYkODhjRz@R zs53&uO?j*Va~lV^In!C<{aJLYvEL<(X~vBi^J%Aa&H>tMJ0_@t+S*6N+TkM%|8%}- zpO_9GWHcLydg-TTuAgIzBk%nMlui)^uRFZF4RvMlT9Qg>U1uWiapba!4Je)WN=$Wr+9@Byfn)SiC%(uuV>fT1e0PXpRzX;s|)OypP9pqd2_OD8v%v5UR zT^5IvGkHVOnS5$}G1EtQx%$p;#yRHz~5!G ztDreBgw~{aY0c;IuPLB=Tf#~&bz{t>KA5@weoOkYx1-Xh(~a z+NGFI8GOvy5<_bBGo;*!fp~1>VtT41;ucYBD`(Lp;B&Tr+7{IlVRSAWN37!L&E?EV zFQ`6JR9Y=5qRRRlw+K!n?Kq}05!M|12Lk4?yo)0ESf*%Rw}Bqd+jyK~D_5}+=-Gjo zO;h7ksMiD{WVGqyGoxf8lo*8(k$9yNKtU?;O+5Na@1k965hHmk)eqEo2=d4*$^0#FCq)&_+yP0)`4nK;ICK_QKl zK5+KAe0{|*vd3+KksVHsund#`zA^U%NidY{R?z;R;OM4Tqe>NFB*}$Xv3;TSp^70fwB!C61wg##r;L!6G}Fe zaDHRd?PiWMG2!o{t=)9ZWLn3{HMk^*sy#MA7!p7cq4br+7ZZfa+{UI5>K?EmTT@r> z3BqK&Au4e?9!2O{!6lYi2ud#3uH_%KR)j{rD^(x;c3z7v1oOWrky9N5->=e>nYLK= z68#rbIRez5>-qrUIP11bqLd`J6C*USMbQ6idjcD47s*fIguL3sP~+VU6||TipzN~mr^LP)=~ixcGr=t4WU zraAhaoF+I#f#z6~Y$d$K)U^mdVQJxFg7aD>+%4e~LlFnC8E&LFn3cC5fIe7Uf}}?n zxAggfXU$~|9+(=qo@fV^vhz#W7j=+9Z1=?j{vB~oh_)wQu7c9O_N0ZBa; zfFsF$8q913Lbcgt^pJ^i49ct&iNC8F-SbYi*2mi60cb&7iCyTZ!dRe9%p1i%DKhBY zRexm9I!JpDL-O3hAMkI!_~Tehzc|4n0wuACZ#u0pzrq){pei(-@P=I@&ACFJLs%QH z-yfdclH+iued2~KaD>*;02{iC{~1$1(fl=vGBM&R^ta=VX6?b6JJ}KQUOigF74wp8 z9Qn+*06vo}iWLdI=ZQ+3Q@&st2>coXSibv12BV5p4?#rq6-ZM8c~;-PaItsnAb@ zLvvFu3bcHkfYTuebCea=yRnl^wO26HT9{3V+_tekL8Fue$C1RELZKQM&ONX8W3bSX zt{U=m70s@*B`^k-Ns@T2s1woRMphDn_!;=V0ObVDVioopiG{tI6n~x)P(zCl_2p(PLVD+f! zk@l3OpRA%)lgzxMNvR>)%@xL}Xk&1t!Dm4ks8;bl8q!z~dRsoPx3LGEIMf`edw)a^ zNX6o92*+pqRPYrj1uSWT`Xkx1i=wT=duUo$C*})9RWdRedRQBjxzBuKNL&FK%hlF* z38+!loJez^Q)WaH*N-JNtjwdyjxaTr8`Pp{-Awf={EL|u(Rl(_cR_fxw-4~yYDwU!(~0j^q6aaOc&` zOMg$#hu3Cj-kMKE0znUoli5}^9D7nf8aiJEmFpm2P2UFbkNJd}T0u#?b;u6P+hAtj znA*C&@@>5ZQV?u1rRJ7`@Qi+nKpddpcafd5DAwh&m+M1wZa5cQVb-=StA1ZvKO-H8 z-6IaS(Z?J^hMYOiHM|5CLH1EAlZeDlcqN{>5U?2(IG1^sBIzeqa9eM6N94-(t#e_n zDTBICtYD#Ai*W3KQ`%?$Y%kU7=qj$rv9wk7^iI`M%O;vtBxNxba{VvmzQL(uY4)}$ zP3%GoFv_95FFw1dUg(+YW^Ofux+vh`blKrRc)$V|%xDW`eBSw(G7Jj*+O+$m5>7|E zHEz2DcP3Y!WS5O7)gR}o*L4H_(RT`!FMV9sDpX3FP<15GjSAC5{$uACd|4^<+ggAn zHO^*Dz?`{`-~Wa(4d?V_A*o#3K-=+OQfl(DDAZi;YQSt+1vQ3xJ2hk3>Zn9%E5jnu z>kuZ~#S2BF`hS{UqYk`PzEbDcYYYga0SqU3e|&G6z2|MpmPbjkwo^3x9!i)}b((x; ziskR?GC`VI+emBO={qSV0F{>IInRva%4# zdr404!S1=4NOV&nO<@YfN(uuBN)XcK6U_XN4GZYv#fj{7tk!;W2-SfPE^|*--L@vL zM6_^B03yiizJ;v{29&cGVjZ`tt}jeez03@X<8^XjA$H zzzs(0>!>$K=`TCg^-a?Gi=7<^ zbq3K)jnbOsB-3US*U^;aeeR-f>#j*`2@{MvVpi3ys5S)TM^v791(F0+nk54z;Ys-J z^3qS=RQab&cY9!Gh=+f4I&~2-hN6E@oq`49p|y*QfWQh{G-Am zj(_{H2u}n%Y&GSqnoLswB?guDSY`@HvwWOtg)5tb>5b$!1?~3y7MB~M9RNJ4^RHP>o;hZNBv6wv$>=Z z^SjFp;8B{!D_Mc0W%j^1&9tb4atUsfzkR-%tLic>-tZu*zTSNk2l!iPi_lUw)jBn} z7aJ3MgY3Oc=4kJB`+kk$GYd?m)?0u5{d8uw=_@>h?Xq{U8tJ61Y+@JdT7(KDx2QqB}T@Y;kF6j^#B9J{7LR z2r@%3b|tBB?hOwmQHn|Fa8jX#f+L391bvfZvqb_7Cy5O>@~w>US^T%+Vjj-%ZFlaJ zA)Rc1MA9&=2#2EEl@eY2f~+d1CcXHEXy@=2!tPEmw>Csc6fdm2oe62p+|xgda5M5w zrsoT|{iv=6qAvh|-T&X-)igOyW!b-?U{w{NEb4>qh9ZCsBIxLhU;c)VR{ z&=;Ca5bKPfXew^z$0PY$L3l;r?_2|udZnB2|O%7GiV;P*q+Kv5Xc9Tx&qRh z7tu{v(qW{$(3ck$gVsZpGw=Q3gA=0c8}J&!{DNTe7Hcm{D zKZ{Y>82l**`V%%_%T2M}g<{g$TZtHrIUWCB733`s>;!|AhJ~HH+N*sj2D#Sp81xam zb)*%aS*Usa+hqvt8unO^ZXYLoFy(pZb!M=b%BkBMrrR4KGL7HGDSziDm2lWE*5qnd ztI5qv5X2T0J4fEASdReQ$jKbBq|EYnU@z0hv$91fx=L8BtgVRq8dC&LJgY_%DHd~& zx8FM?CNN=CZMN-`2?aA4=@u7fmrUM?u&F{NmcI33A9j-kTuGH#IIv`vYDwWHk))cH z=~-8|MXI-~3j|&=LxyR_|LpejQ$rEV>g$LibtE%qfgc3A{!blHky+fdml~U=D%=+* z1Uji9_{Bpz&$E)Qwm*A@R~_*|u=&TRY@mZsNoP__UJYqu?~nGJBn5vdO__xCsV)Hb zDj`#CXpqKG(0X$GeAQSt^)`XUE#o4eWWfAjQgD$U4pM|REAk}>cSwxtc0oYh9Z2w5b>h}*U<>IxH62t z?I+@C|00+COH z86~P?p>^wD#M+-SV8HVr$u}P#myZaxP0IJK8JCycJ}?7RPqRW!9Mjy7e>7fwe=kf5 zN+LzfFv5F6lXO2Ld4JZhnz~epB)ppw?MvE`d)dD$J;k{IHaba9X#wW}-yHpsY{fkA z%O?y05icbynf#sFxznQcnNr7cZU-PC|9^}TFdWbk4UvtUItfWy+^$$1&x&s+5=MyZ zI~EyodjHJJnts+LPf*9}TY1KNKzU!&p0)ed!N2%cN+GZNG!&pBKUC%25SBRf z>x-Y+MRX0Ly3P5nA2%02yM5Fl$|_R0Dv|~8ARC3=%LwMFvBmEi5E?Q&*0O2vK1^`6 zPVQny1sN?*D$dO8fw!H*h3eQ$aMP(2m<9_-`RkFU#4>P5!g+On`SFk1b+JQ#`SE|O z;C0i^{{>UNB~IfNR_?RPoN_Nv`~U)gA_6EcvFcuT<$2kn_F9GMN$ux3!o_FhCkS%& zEDLCf#A+>4ir1{MRvn#mSLn(`K31=bp_0PFfz=dwujb{>VjeMC`=RX{_Ep&phlSIV zoxho;Ef~CclQb7WuclaF-s3szYZ)Bb^(yqfeY+~S%fauC>9Q?}o4elY1{T$NJYm)Z zcN%6YYL)sL1WW@FjiK3kV=*LH#X^dQum)C1r#bLW=QeMLG(g9?gYZq~>h0B3jkg*d zi8rQkccakxew0e;Rs94_l{G1)fBEsJtcZbU!2aS+XvgEHFoZ#5j{njY@q@4(5henc zv6|SrX0O^`9Yi>>y;33KI%DO($$X?m>ILPv19HKjcqLA&8)^k*UpzhQTWJtu8a?yL z{a;tvon8oG`9;ar3fR6FvZ=;xkkRoXJK_%P^EqBFZxj0IQp9Z!SrZTC{ zH0ogk>Xfsuz)`NA+Br@nksi?>`0(Dt*{=c_VUOvsrTgV_wZ`*ZlECAd7AFVO_@w|8 zGwIAiQdsXx-ROg9r+FJxb8DYr?6jb%xdbofN*k$G0l!>H74#PGh_-wSxiODsH)h*Y zvQu^qOYHIUb=uB50zxPQCNf;PxUrn}ZyX&{DS)H3f48LUyoi57j?pZFhiCe?MS=foDE0$hK} zvxxG-3Jp7HQB)6MshsUus2^HgP40h9nMR5lypaa@$kdm;ORO1h*rAtDF@a`*XrfvQR4mLBdpJ znn%++Yk{y3xJkq+_%*vO*7aZl%cYSu!`}M`4xhJ;K{eBpVcbT9C()T zCX>9DW~pEP#3{UXF8=UZ{dCGo?}emW_%g$4*RV08_wa6QDG$-^1v-_?AP*H*(+I?k zVLn4lm)2>P-PQ})D`^I{@CLOy&Y|eAW9XZ($7#`}4(ekVU<8mCur}A)M8lm@a2ev2 z@{F-|>N4uPx-EkmcHONx$@DyvdHv)jeWg%koxoC}lffGU!Z0~@g<{}R1W3|pma2D- ze@mGybtP-l4&)-8~wIc@WLsA7lh_M3>VxzeFXT)0jzD%vbFp+Q1;(ZiZc;a zT?uWpv`A954HgXAX6tigznW#vDJlAekBO-B+-6J=Y~qqnEg-($*NoF}THn>K%O##v z`y>U`O39gv!Ai)XV-kTys6@Pe>E*KkED4o#8ouuQI%!%g*`-Xw3)R7|vIGlF^!lai zSAMT^P!5PgAx9e;89-dhT0IU>BBs>tPy)DbO`K7WY~c|a4uW%D3a$m^ImN6G=cqTu z!FunWr$kag=nan25etsHU|Y;4eMi4BCz~~~!C4NMydUm?sQHFFVZBpVlo;ri78VO+ ziMecpBuCjh!F>_xU2p)P?m}EEP*(>XCMmCmwZ<0$Ymh@1K1P~y+nG=vCd7FG}lgfC=%sH z<|B;wVo-%xqhuIrdc&0 zhb)UubdfnjQw^pmmS&@i*pe6O3SO%vq2?N{;2tQ~mRG4&vMMe4NRHzQk+!bPh6iy- zi9U0CQz&Z6$Q~jZ#3^aeBF0+6mV4R7k6gW*V$i7(Rs&!aFnB%$2Vfp#(QK3i2q$p{ zeknt6btr%MO)K2GZ+qZao{MIG^$!1)r*ME3XU2V_-dlx_p6JZirbY{tB~er~2lT`+ z(G44vW504P+wavv*TZ^fT9YOPk$8~G`HAaH$Cu<2wZHP*0O8j;eao?O0f2OLma{Ap zGk86kXe;QfH?g7Pa0;x}gxYmb>lX zSfNX*wdrsp39O2?IQ4%ckJe;fl^2{dFp;a*_Jz!6&>d_1d4_xl?bkTs%VKPEI(3-j zmcw1$wAjWpr=s)%_WCT_6&m@)`| zuuzvt%AkA?XpJGm7VWrZrCek(`M)X3sk1boZE8k;l0x{8MT8rN*5D#++`Q^FZ48KA z^dIZpC@3Bo6<*TTn@+(}`CTLyN#{vju8dBQ4HuBR9*OIl6x1bQ({Wq{C`$3369Q*V zFXTGSRvCw`j}5*&p5S2$BoAY`sM}A5ZsTE= z{-5^NmAQF35Xkd#>g z#;PvGLmHOy3BefC51jZ)V3mkiUlvt~k7~MV0?8LQwt*}OU7x`$#YhC0WqSbaxre)) zv1`Z=Hh96*S<6G_%Vv<(a#Ir$r(Vdv=a(PxEIdtPJHafyOwzOo7maquLhE|eLt!Cu2F&ZTA z+gb{uFodDlkk94)6cA^Mh|i_-e`5<*=fZIt`|nj9P=A_vSxGwEL72sq+~> z{j7MqiPI!29~H@5O4_3!45ofA@b3mH4GUd@mFWy3Qk9~bDsMpxJMw!H=>ys> z87&RFycH0Zbj4fLCtiU>>2-`tzDR3U&kwu-QQHF%p&B!r-g>Uy(VJ;U&P9s37{+1^ zcOcF(fVE&%H<(3Xmyflj#ReL5B(>QGz{^)*80MDq)uRH%W98Q0pq|uui z$;bs&0_N;akPxU*NS_8$)@BwSjF)6gc4TOA*cE#i^e4H{sklteQNH$J5H{-nX;Ec8m8ByPj^9h&u zag6%E0%{$i_v5jmdo--cW300u;2g0L5JQ?sh!z+M<@hbTS5nq?v$TbiVh&2h9o!C= zRddQ}7sq4D0&y}wA-1q#kuA+BX7q4kyVVBE*pF~y7X#YTre<^vb26_%$iy-S(z zSJoRt+%#r0X5u4_l{jzTu?HUY6J|6EcgTcJ=(v;0O<6b+i~C6E;%_^@iKi!b#nyE? zTY+m9T#*{d0B*Rf3bJA`_E@7QCk!m8VuUL^1Bll%F|fdhB&hRTx}uH_8ucH4iB%Q} zmvz`3bM;41ue-J=RSqz8{)p^K&<2@6>_gEp@hE+#PbNSNk@SfFr3jF5V_q^R(5WLd3s@?p0Jc!*wP+~Yoco1*Vxn=Z5Fg{#UKJOAA$gK%4p3jl z3|)d0EGlqD5s4*2E!dZs?(}<*BI&Xn=~G}QI2$`sk&lz!S9S|yQB@uX&FKAMsK;`I z%`((W1?WrfeSHOR9LW;ph%IKcnAu`xmc=ZKnVBuiA`2~MCX1Pw*=oB~9~BmA_ws{7_hjz>+}bWD&_LnZh?m zKvg*s88@X{kCLrQB7NjEnDam=QES&ovSi`+xTwihkB%MO)m!hLu~LZ$N!KBF0UN1W zx4~1OZIzKYw%zgX5g$K@=OhsDpi#hDu!!N51SlAaqc9nL_htRPXB$F zM~qFxRqtKZEKgj9X7Glt{F~`PDon_PZWKP|F!k3fv4;ENN;buqkC%C6)B)7+a#tPr z3^@@`hnuE&FYj^k^L9C=D2xi`2eYE^bM^f>n$~BC0%xpdqI|*Y7J*A(baXPHWt_V5 ziDdq~C6l?$W?N)h_WK?PlFDg?I3b)Qh$!^EYNFr0gD_@@P{WriI+GX47X)-=1YwWo z8*KLk(E^I4Wm0hqUsd$Z8UB%;=CqQEY-H*)37WYyikz6NE;q^7dt$GHJ3~Uq(MIwI z!||AIqc-n8G=0Jty4-?n2m~4LAu}twDs(m(fuTpL7D~lIjO9nnnK*~rw>?Z~1=~>B z3Kn?KYobA!R`#IEaSJbx!f6yj!jIX2_fes^d(6$vdp0sGAbhM2KGqZ)Pmz;8OzPwu zC`c0`NaCXr@|P6j08boY6ymS+uNDygNp(9;77n`#MWLw0slX-f;d1sTqiC?IKCL)n z5GQ6f32GjTQIW|kWPlez*GYg?27kx-98!3tCt7#eD3H5H?6>j-88p9ryT-237SAxl*!hQ%?+b<<45M1DFe-I@Ehr|1QzEHRfy!l2jK$@9Q17V}tX$|i9wYr0PC+&CusKDA z+UdTIpdI#2@ZrcwCfLb}QQ7xMt^m*&2*oT8S!z2;F2JPLOtkX*Ko6UT8>Bacx=(xB z-$3DHc!iT}U+~wM+y-A?r<~ZP11Eo8Yv_V#5Lc4wq_AFn7MS)X@qy@ zFX~DQdH&%X7Q*q+@WH%^v)p5Q>aZAxzCO!4M&_I1|)Gp{fhgKeh zqZp}*zVgnA7GR=7RRwyaxAi!tHDy`BU80KyTb#9djMJd;`jb%40_z15iOMv-IIj$`9(!5=NTl>dd2B=0Jke4GyiEH^j6%MH z2K6GuaG6r2Tf6Xh9t>Hr^zJSu|= zv#~LPY>GfCy=xEb*Fw4wgyjw6brgx~?g8GP`wGLkt^=Bk5=_P)ppWtG-?Tm{gYrBq z9%$~DfG0xxgVk=0w)#xXcR6-P z%f_N--fjxdX+U#C9Zg=4e}+=#lWbvao@7lJJ)LEZmzSoP=DYa;7(;YCf;TI(M5SEk zb(BZ)SqFOiQ@bCpnUhMi?`Kk1uzKPiU7yTYp>ssKzhNEwtqZi26z#J5#F-S#;8Kbx z)b-$3ao96Soq}*0H@eT+>hKSfFbk`{e#ui#5kq1BK8~bUCi!g57MB=qa+mDl+fFIM zDOUr|f=|L@wy#5xwbGlcPKlK|F7B4GH}XlbEBko(R^VvSRvS#d{&OU%1P_@x7=x~b z!YO0jTLB)L3wgR|xTy2GRlOjh9SxqvGdZ8#LC! zChQ%jGA<7`EKFqK9MXI%U`N;P=w$09dJH41M$S1!Dx~I5QPZ+g2y<17&TH9>pWXAp@yTk0?fKTt*(-^+^vN$IL6Xw z0V6CR4gtOa&>WODVZvZ+(#1Eq>OgIlBuF7EqG*ZaiRz$v+S-}1{2r;EmQ;J{M|#^h zXse;0KS&O;&>rr!yOs7F9rs%oZiEMD#h}+}yQ#JkNv-Z7hDOm=hVN)1+}2?$EGx;` zlumU@-BqylOvW-~sYrv7FG~!qLY@uY3~?kvS6o__8rkJ6gz_p4Px@7WC}D|vkEX7- z+MJZ_bK4JhhnTWi;*$=-urC3F7@BfIM(`Ud1~T8RL~|!4rPA_Wlr0KrV&!z2Y2VJR zS&`h3!P|t`nvGtaQ?S~wupV-BVTy4ZIRHv2QIKgY3A^f`b!SGa;Cms=6>E|mRTQbh zeioa+T?X^q!|6;7e-v!VnHSL&f*!P~XP7+ZCQp4|9h#CLHpW4J>46miuk zn+s7Gwv)W-sfDGkf`EN<*zZ!CaZ9^2_L82&6ZHIWh%a5?eo;nfePL3R5OrM6g2*@9f#h|)fz zVGG8bR&g@h$E5t={Znw+gDCx+t5f_mXG8!V+ z2SHxkxmj>oaanARjU&wE^Ql4LPVNv~b)cRJR`4OoLv@)vj$+;?(RfZV)^|t7;|rev zdgI81%A)wEGwuE&QBENJ-qtVMOaZK-xRt~dTs>X!uA+wF4Sk(X3DDY=;h#Y?;@W10 z^$rggJeqXFqxpHFAb47c1b6o6vfiqieLJ`VrCpkvR7Rjtro9U&Xo@`hqtVMwqq%93 z_-Kvi+fkC{-z8Fl|Ja;2+Em;)1Z^sOkE|widH}stD}R;%8Q z2}QE5da0MdIy&GXw1!X}tpr~WXmdElrt*d&oUP_E2aF$$56lm;5< z>l0m$v{2fOo0mxhL%DkC6|g2R&L;?M=UhQ5C(cRi9FALkwBi=c_c`H6vP9L%(v@$4 zFh-V&pFck@d`+K%tY>;>Ai{dPTT*SXy^2?5v#k<~8jlFls&ns}3>@7ry9Iyfi|a;- zJ{3b*UYjhfKcY+P-sAzQ-BmQ*()kZh*U(ywS3C~tf@ehn6noV$x8V7N-TT$lGk35< zwc0SDHGx~1Aw603iFZg4_@b80=Y09m{I$-MH4Tf2<;`d0Z{##0H+YyuOB)hfj~>FI zd!}hA1suyYMIS5gWn6=rz)|x=kvEFht}H8NL2sdNqH-0JnSl{?G>5oA)K^R&l0ugz z(&T!CMxP+IQ}fIx`D308Zfqoa$7z^huKINqR#d}Xb6EU2LL}9QyJPG{Zy&|E*7XPu zjAsW-jjT8}%4)=yg?ui2zlWfh+f6xGGV^+dPaWO^E+v5Q!+BBP^#b-eF2q)-#7Hv` zHq;hnu-<`qjN(o6G%joUTz1dS!`QJdEuuwpQ}bwN zS?asP0RD9L#Qr$IgZOqh24KdYIR0VjCI<`!MqHj4~ z;0Re8je=usC#2x_+2)KMrI7vXp6%V#CbL3h{|XseXGIdM8WKkm70G3D?sq5@r&5vL zkF>$>EOwG6!=MwJ;;AmPMK@DUeVrkctdfSs0%FbECQUX!4Ckp|WS430fh*%dZaZ^) zs--b#);1*wqky9N{u-t@r@;!vah;wjp|#DCkAWN&4lVD@grz;?EF~HCgv@XsPphnCNV8V5c2H9D>14}h{8SX(N{kW1Uhmmcze=M!> zn!!cggZ}nY4W}v9aErz2+3-dJ-RG7ninYoNq}5Hi`Ga;B`Gwiu^LVfAvAd z8HT8~6-Z9iptfTcl06FYbskP~;uUOP^^UyAx)6wH zRV`mLLT+J!pPq)z8d>ak`ZR;dvM4!0l)m1i`W93$)!p zt3FI<2Y#m{ERPzs&hjVaY0j=Ep6Ou%C3(f>LIvT*Xm*F748pV;JY$ntYW5U=s3;I{ z`tX#4#WXieRTi^o)znp_!L6uvr%{d#+Jtn=s=I5t;+uL`@-S#F`kdxH<#J> zX5yYL7MFGBo`l|m$$%$LQO`@5y{7JpzOY++RqRIEQOBKBmEu;{e(_pxKO}d#^S*8S zs@QYMDOs(*+*KhRIua{gSWW$D61tlI;<~_E3|)Gok(GMSy%xpfVcibxrt#ZiVspY* z^7~P94lqIY%u`fGdrmU*g&2%!&*Dt1*kzl^WUgM&Tf{mlWNukgF?ziHU2yItp`Rm* zx?@xRy_+OLZ--R(E0*wNAu~Y|mz~^qn78J-w1=e#8Qm1SA}gfFazj>1p%hR4$1#OM z;)>Rnvn)ha@_9m`q+r;xo4YIf2}k|hCK?dm%*K^0oQqw`%+jITp~2;5amHKYxH!ZI zc|h+qlCpKSSe!dCxqIUrLXz3Zg7gxV@0cM$4SbMNA@uRyU_V8{W@++Pe?0WJUFLY} zHyY&JRrM+2u`HO{s^1K5v6}HnnB_^`Bs4T+nt}s=s2fbt0iwc#s{%+YP`{VlCAD(mVGE3zS7S5z)t;FSit_J;#@1*>Il63y!33Te`H+13<=Ys` z^-qQgSJtVYok#hf17(BS_@BMxrNF?^006){K)vc$E&Jx%Q8f?%U=|zzKml@HZ5@n0 znAqAlDeD_p8PmI2TlK~)S%5Mk1)M#h5#8aanNfulqkSybfYtu$&B%QO>7dRuQEI!^ zKpkWgQZU|3%6v7(9vDi#CRWYrt~hGKbAZSpOrxE3%(Qj2pm~_=@Q@ZDnSOzRO;)FdRyZeL8RLqRYRs- z2-14oy<^H8V>D_}sI!B=iQd?X3{gc7olFr9we8gqF7+)zII}#5!N92}uN3AK9%MJ! zaH1GkacmVyI8|0dlL;ekLfO`)8?XOn!0E11C!N{NqJhYjUyY)@JivKJ9c!<4w%j<@ z;3*!%C20LLxU1Ux=6g)?raQZ}>zk|VW1HV%4DmYultY7A;@iwJ^D3}K@b7N$JHNdk zgaQEI*+Ks41{-H<17ins8`EFiaFVuSlP!kk4eSPtNgW$2&rtiC(IUm#NmUh1b5{a@ zVQS{3A&9Jt?UUlyk~X3K`2jA=FG4>rs*rdVZZfQS4Er39L$zqmMOYscO#HVmD_;R_FWm5wH_$CNbA+=)%G3!zBvUVonVu zy-iCDD^@Hmi??^ew-rp7D{E!tvqL*~wKrk=TP^~}XO7P|M4MqR6_0cKp2m)uCyz53 zJ0=PtO3QQvw@st87gt3EY9-|RM<@m-Eo~Jvu z10%-wBwcQCe=)p44nY*vQA?RFrj#_9&9_}> zkw_WOxH_EpUf|A>y1mH|;)Y!|45^b?^e%1w2o?g5h!m-WFW%Q=&^ zJL)gFj(87CBFr|52aAg5*dO(0;=b7#9GArVtDX0_)9&oB%S%zDA)3Dh|E_t zjlT?J4$SI*?TL!}%aL7%nls3{5~q>-qxjP#xD#iSeNkMpPl@<+ckiFNu!2;<+9s{= z$QG!Hby;huN9I(b%ZasAz9mk2@UlJ>=}WU}QI5Elkm`!+6+rIhJUo89R1tBscqg5F zCL+^jfg}yjCV2%PyImZVGF=hQvQ`-Ff!;X^3u0__Dbuzm6Wh)vp3=kBWHRU_wQIlN z(dTkbMIW=HgB}5YGNZH**2bI}Q@7v{w!<9MQ!|oiNt+?4mv23*W%vNMDPqmMhcje~ z@q$+QSdr))3a~}O8-XqSO?Z8e zPb0{|fJKB$iI*V1*}zh345Pb!PS<~n|KdX$xq2b3UJK(yE zN3P*0zsCG-Ey+YzuHhKJFuA}mGX2*B23-_3PCT|KKZyKpP|5jgr+HPn!0U+N@KMUx<;+kz=Umrdizi0A@^7&XJIFAoa>{mbNN`OGtHI{ zOD8+$jsn1U^V=%w=&z-goH??4(!SE2IKj!)9dNj4*7 zg!fAa$Ge2Z0VM=!hKJ3}6UuY61J@Qtq$A^9WPSmU2$DX#>o?0DRBf|CH-*w?5A8Dn z$@^t`Cv0u8go&Ng6QP6&W8j5N)=+c=ROWxmfnrsize`S6e+y$Y(LSg@$25haWcN@q zehft+aI6O^2v#tN#Uc~?O~#6PqP-qWApff1muj{K?Z0Zx9$H!Q|BngFLJ4HL&H=ye z$sU5Nhy7)bu~Xxh=J8)3v4o6SWARJ)wZEZ2VrBQcsQJIr{`6Ammc4Hje;LFh@Y@EU zMfWpH{=e+3*?5rB=40D;)mX++&6c@aqtXR=HaYi`nQ|2pj zI9eFe^MYQ*FuCYwx&=MLF{MggY;)|k#S+OP&P|!NE<8C!>_y`?`FkB1TrhtdE_bn_Hom}hg4lW3j89Fme==2k#r!jM`W~?sVoNER847+1E*h) zZhtHNTPYE&XD@1OuVR6?=TJ!hrsP|rkur>_OMr;L&+%4r!(si;VrksN13ms(`@Y}f zi9-Eakig+rxW)3LIb2D|5PHU2*TH*7F+X}^9zT2Txm&bD4O2=IunLqFyk zktSDRO_)=qoM#V>4K4ADif6wk!-+w13i~-R6XrfaLwl2an?FL)Y9F768`Sob^oc`` zM4E<|bj+?&PlHxnw~KjwHXYJ-=rc@ePEalqg-{kDcS&akeA8Ks9Iz^!FeG1oJ%gC2*mQ=Hs;BY<&`)Dl&h)jLp z7yRJNF4sp}_IbO?ZX;yKVJDPz0AbuBju}L;m~m9j;&{(1L1x@i520|gv%;KFk=>w> z_N=2_Fv`BF$lv=IeJf1}^Ac}+8_A2c8#5sFTs)TPLW<9@y{&0}aj?4b#bWgCeYa|u zYVSqa;DX%bvxL>50ypJ*akEy`)qS|H9UQHNtrh#<=8iwHah)Kc(*`pgY%5NN=_bds==hY`>>KUmWh@SMW*yc<-o+vTYh6d%tZ<^!-}mLc)KU?bP~nXe zJj{dRx@JpT%eyAXaoZ~JW%-)>mdi_ckG2)zBjbMeIjW^iXJeT|wGfdu#F93G7p{X( zQ&sq%2HW3Ed(Yz0%LigNgX}NC1G46MO0L24`GD(O*ZSK%5)G%ok&{Uc?g+()34$4S z#2gL*-x+14b**Y()nQ}4TX3enpG+&_c7dusaj`% zqCg`zwMuk-u6%4r?GV%RXxl%{w{4|^=Q4wF%-dW^O=Ec;DzWHtLhRaP#7fE^xtg#C z#N3=@rh=(1xk3g*w?AaV!cB6$;G;aRQw=D;}Ds5!M_|ui&>$H zkSuzP(0R*LYxN+N`Udvz(SQ3*#hVBiY$x6U0O-F*eY-2FU8gaNa}cO-dcQFd{n_e*p4TW}sIm zkoI;iOi4|EB!QURx$phv<}B$zG0)kRil@BKdy}MgOu}zA`%WUf^PzwLxB?lc)jR0? zCx2o|{5H(Hr9FeUX)Sot{tHd_t&inn&euGE*e1nCQ>bcZ4j9Wi5S1Yx+^z$UmEHG` z`VqQ;8)ex9tM^a%{EklIZ?AoF?$0KCYg%VHK)C||KZ37z$elcW0~f;T{i%>{R1H!F z)Wra)`WWBLeHd}rMd4e2vQ=~R`X0$@g*NLdb33BjThjUL z3(;hub5a*sTeo8_4CB*y;Hn|6)Wzu6W9Sm?v{{Q7?qTOFsj1}%gYWXo>TRfoNV~+0 zv3!0m?|EyS1U63h*>rBJz`W)Z2}f(@9lcT9@Wn~qIjAQyS$J(UCfSsuU@yNsF<=iK zNA?0YU~_>bDV>YI<~zn5JEV}80s%z>`zJePWNTCD1f0e(LIMD&z`N@AC&%a4FHK=! zp32z9Nmu!^ow1|#uRH8d1v?J6BKttmap0{9`x_0UIX<~SwYm<*R*oO&f1UpX@-_Q- zY5_%5fIy^w0qcMqBU?jx2U|PG5Bhd?|Et<>j9Y$IK=cYw_Sf|D_b10k0GMa{FWS)7 z;ja|ipOtUS0=yG|mf6i(Df$Q%4hW~el`zQF% iA@Luu_R-(qKL<#8DF|Ty003~nF96tgl_$Xd2K*m!H`qr2 diff --git a/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_3—Philosophies_du_pouvoir_et_Archicration-pour_une_topologie_differenciee_des_regimes_regulateurs-version_officielle.docx b/sources/docx/archicrat-ia/Chapitre_3—Philosophies_du_pouvoir_et_Archicration-pour_une_topologie_differenciee_des_regimes_regulateurs-version_officielle.docx index a1fec825436892efce0455aba6268f7563001806..6daefb2fb66c687198e7f5c7375f2adc0697c968 100644 GIT binary patch delta 107325 zcmZU(b8O&k)C5`^Tie>Y-P*R>ZM(H?yT97@*0$|#ZQHi(_P*bjdvo<9Cpmx5%t>Y@ zPg@gm!W+OI5uWDJnU7ObH(a-ES{Cu6$zl-V$X>QJ+91 zKs7o5pWt7ARj1l}?0;L081!i2bP9&eki>||yrP&|-+ ztDpuZ5A$~q7awhcc>_1Z(^*tPrdL9yi%r#xm@@>1H$f_`koH%Bg*2?k_)X0-P-Q^GQEa}7c2fs39=$NNT}uU!^H!(PwD|50t_4L7 z%l|4~Q&F2}FA{ju3~1$YkA-i`D|kzL-e(s)}cW0g2#Q+KX2_-7XBc(pU?Fj4pr)0U4K0$c-=oPoNyD7?R}X% z|6*!nQ|2aHKzC^r$4(x?%ApYz+8&y-(#|5kpt=se;Lk)UFT*R&ny%($>jep3WHo4I-sVK0GdMN1H*x@l3?S?@JIEpObi_U?)bB( z-9wkAc7dMqG2^9sT)jIe8sc{S$_gd}dez3OF?>teFw155!KJ8~7(qZ@Ly9ZC#HJwU z>HP=f=$*SOq5ytRBHm4YHP@Q@$7<_RB&s^(kvZ~<2V>T6k}Z_hO36vibS0Ko517xu zWExxpY3lcRPBf#+L_8{+Yep3C2togMk%naa-z9Zo0Gu4?mG5Ul2)X7JOXjiSXarqsx4@@FvS0gw%F*Jo z97b7f=vKtbw<;|LiJH2(_wxO@DxY$WtO6xuYfw9wiXzqG z9EF#poA9IJF?;(p-wX_&t4lcM05Z?PAlnN3Sk6I4j>`{GA9ga8z>iGV&lg>j-j~6L z7VgF5l&imvye?aupJw#pW-)2DaDUxpB*pSrcp1eJ2Tr}CJ`gRj^}0MUYt%e zNm$Y^z-|ETQW{H%wCJcCtY7`NzJpq~50wh`Lpdf?d|=}tY!6E1PSfwM$T<#=kpDvq ztkQ1~rT=J|{r}R^qBsO@0QNsLq&AL#lK@)dj_aJ5o73vGt!e2RoTMfi37bmF^{DE< zFFAGUc)CI)CHK-GI6<(7U-PHj4u+2c7;izx;v`42&z|}c{NQhPG9%&RTD?D?w07|H znD+@O(B^$j{z6eAx$xDer}b>>WJSpZ!i#Djs02_QksTeab9}ph+V>6?#I}K6!U8?+ zX=zp@eUZAcJXZL`UlAc`f}08TAh0i^YF*G{8*xg|PDq>3zBP6l{knd*C$2+aG=C)e5E&ryuVekovK@Fdk+`&GBCEektp9hQ(hFHOl4ZBH` z@`8~IAbF4Quq$M;+}y)S_3U30KY^jSoYR_@{Rq_F=ur3pg6WL3V_j8Lr?kn7Ri_64L&^JAo3V^q-6kcacUXRsF}&VBK{Pb6}#|VLyQi(M)B4;{az(7 ziT}vCePMb2rnuv(<{lB;B@T3e=6=R=xgydv^HRv7m&>}uDs>W40V=9bPiw*D6!6&i z_&SR}KUtexj%~litkO@^VGndB=7kE11N*H!+cS!l>!#y3E(gc;G{NM=MH&qFTA-r? za=NX1-{E?p31EDee!gfl?4S%+(#}G|&DunVZ!n&5TPL~XCN+g09U&^qq=!bcBFBo{ zullkgKmOsL*I$+S0^G*h8ldI~K-Bj>Ft6Z7%7@%FwF~6@UAJj_ko(y72y1kBYRua` zfX`>d$K#_({ga$@3EVGLr%^?zsL*(^CNm5hQK8F z&Lb;U3sPl8yI1&d&rX`axM}wbEjZ~LRf}L~kmF~z_{?n)Fc^EMbV$$@ixJzJ+gnwc z1aFQZ+w1-gaI3`I8b4OC({zb|Z3=Y}j^(?cO`!gB@-u4!56fa4Sq@5FxAe#Rqq0+j z*ebK)y?J6VE*A@NIaVThBJ@9-jd(b({*0)4;}RGrp%%T5EmTqZj`b`#075i*}rw12)3>y(dS>9A& z+^jXQ*2qj~_vq*Oo?`9w$Qk8X-OB=tfmRhz2bj1c{Q@hQppzT+PVz*l0 zp2Gl-J99mj8LY}CkhS9{b5^T1yoAu%T3D}{tsfY8_>ZojSF^h*$!FX~y_%7e1|Q3o z5`-SzX;$qnA8+H7*0JJpw%U9)J*DtHc{T8M%)#;0vp6?N>=4&zaWqw%`q^RjE zt;W@m4i89I%G2wDA5rSLvl0VWF8$6;VlBYhlvKid;iXwJ)O78@r$6@W)*fb54(Qp! zaQpklhI1&fkIUlI(<7fzyAwADAI(2<2^r+wA=hoLe11I{q}&R1T6`IGq@@TC6P~Q{ zO(Xm*bX@EDF;}9f4A^e24EYny)P;v%lUVQIbk&uB9V3J|p#)#6%L*kTi&?jrSfwy^8`41dJh% z;Ulc&Y@`)0!FaU(;c01UX8lU|kzpC$*N%+JNEBoGdhk@xuphu~sj{nZ5tORLLh{b{ z1W|>*NEWhcWF7sAJ6E3TxVVg6q4b@u^+EJ~m2e8L-daLDMtzO|YC(R$RtUz9#(+t<*mSZYM zCzyO|01r(8=a!|(n33>?#tteI^H$W>M_?0yEsUffaQ_0z{L{A+OZnz0-X)v$=N~4! zCd{_M*BfViff!KF!%Sz3Ctc&E*BFRq;({;NzvLpHrmF@coP0d%83@25VKF4ZBUS@B z!C7iOl1M09{c~}_Iz8Ns5>O&Fm*<;vO6(jZvHw{z_EI@M>WD`rJ6#&-q8yiSakk=l z%=RJmZ2h*AvE>q#R&rfG9mbX+wlLl75pDZi2C2S**O|Bn%dbq|4!YW0*3)6 z6P2v`n0^dzKT`{Dv8k?L57HPJDa`kl6A>4y<4H15U|oJZMXCyELua5hw~)KN9=m;a zL{VNZ)grpjA+hkEP-TMBsGDn>cryc6n@-|Fh9uD6!wlN|rF0 zF2s1TaSS1UpQgXO2o9&C7e&uF+4!#@;65Ey4zLTU&Y@j6vdAUkB1P#+zb_SyRpCiPA z{Qt3&sxt#l3TTYmt~34Ue5QrivKezshY~)}4geX=J0bZ5NzbRt_l6;-paQlr9&0!M zSzJ}jE01Tb5>z39pM34gRTQF4$ymYFYm|_qgsdy4iwODl@K;?)?t!yVs4RsAbiykT zx^7>^wpl#ta+b>Y^}T%jiQ^8UELphMG(TEyMuEDb0nSXjM)%=It!=OWSe~`PZ8Lehxdd(J+|Q0@cmaOw z^A+7*z|b%3LZ9CHI?#ys!`j91_CdSP*C_l9U0VtUQpyO5{Q~TOyZDW?9q;MA@VL3Lp=nJ-yNg>t{~ zlOof~6zNtgOIpHk8QL>~X}D*O!@bDNy~yqsknZWF{p8U-ZE-L9{zv-RDX;9CX=8Z&Y6gWDnU(b-%2}kJ^FdD7h zLPWWSsle=;*$n{wA58@OnpU{{PZNj)|IPoE zod5S^TizGJ%R%A)ADu>`Hxwzb&?OT~uI|XtnxluZ69MUN(hy1qCVq8{IF8#VPjqOsKIF7$mL;#=^&h?lzG>U9^Xcal2Qu48`M6ztT5f;E zZngJ=-@EK_xVpU_y6E|y`~K>QS2&dG*sHF_)K2JTllPHqVY|>F=O4%6i?ju`4X(a9 zsalouanZQiSY#j8xwLz;U0YpjcJu7ES^c(MyRE;Lq?T1pep5MGP zt}~OozM+l(!3&HMJ-;*4C@0H-!lUPtdHZ)HsN~$+e-xhO|)-J_F_te zZ)&xJlHJM7d{6Uw?U|jf?HT@^2vN^_&$ygitnxnEE={9%R@t#$ z?ztS|HlWjiRG9$%CEKs}cc{ANlmyN@UN`R$#%J3G%%@J9?W4e`>o9g^a+Z3qAO%gQ zuISiWn%nY0I#0!d1c-sxoxhySG53G*Sbh|I7V2?eMtAq; zXS+ch(Q9mCJZ*!nll)*=DLL-QNacf-Fv(f3*S=}E$6#bQ(eZ2;3cMKGy596FA}f%Y zo{fS0>h_QtXV$5!on@R!xzmv&``#qi7=2Eh9#@s?dy2E=w3gD#%(}|-mImt~JuNP& z0XE_-G#El1EZz5MxmlHB;Cy3$lVn+XDIlTSA=2Lz+t!79LwZVjKCp!!F)cZ>dcF$( zak&ipM7(I20goJ0RO*kZ_$^dgUQg5^r&sT)QB||AGaTU2AidyTs>X zFSn;Yk34VG(g>cq`Cm=iY5saG^c;(91oX3Gcj(-hFtn$4Z>K}{j~`ga*}Kd)*q$X$ zoPz2`8ve^u>osCwV|$#0*Gy_yod1;=l(KY#OJ%ISm%#yK%HrHe$4{bzQuY?1{iBr{ zuHU+H&&ihS52M$N&TF?mFZYt{P`e#opP6AkfbJbUO)_GB!K!63^1N-{#{NlRR1&3#H@QfC43 zO>$g}>s4%7oBITL8@`mv4s*GT_AZZb0mo7A^oPfGG9TxADs1cof6W%^2(ZsD7G*{9 z4i`4IO54!0BNMFzB+@}?+N3fp;OvG_~- ztJ4uu#Y=TxyTMNJRtIUnKjWIH+Cz*{D#qb#pE_A!;zrP0AFYf8V;%gFq7T4QSj=7#(uz$M77Bi0DiaiG()iL2D!$>0<@Mfjq4(|OfE&tt) z=83&#?aD(8`r$3-C(%eF;fnP_t!ml{GDBKlxuGgQ3cococc0yZ&)Ct#rK*To=poq_ zpIx!@@sxieCOtZ?qSZHzCh0%-tJ!dRjP1M#a|~_@bLp4h+3QM~nE#@GLDLj35zmol zWX{;v9MlX>UmmIiK;2$NK8oejwkxpXyCRWK#8X;(onEgzJkDPbzZ*nESbT35NA!4* z<)3edSV@wr$jD$nU2(};K8fiyX3N_FjX~ei`qKaS)M@pAcs$mCLv`DrvMPIoT-&ga z2(EOUe=L$QafQMY-!-QBQTZD9qj)3QZy#39AHK1X%D6EE@GRyvPhRa&ePx=QRT=RV zhP+|(AhPE<$?FKQb07XCM`>-Cm@jPWh(}C|#xI+#!75@_G5xaRG0YT#l7F#lm$Elr zJG@%Ye+!+YK!{iD32>QWGS!BP`I>6gkIZ&IUEnn|j1RNPPD}l;!~}H&CYW|L2C$xv z|1uOUiAAXbyltIjue&;C@V(s8J)F|cq4bm#wi28jUL)9y!t-&^Q>5S(!)|r$`WP@M z%cY9Q;wob}_yc83%RSm|JagF28>g_Jfucb0(~16us}egnj+(>CslMt<_o~oAI$sdn^gyvJUySUN5xy1eC{=J0Xe19%GbeJVyoxw%^RcGW_tD8_9jo_d z13k^ni~l-)N6-voU?%}b4n86tZI8BkKSUIKmMhoRYhf}=!5GZ~)01+)(RZnKExO1l zaIoT}Sl982e1h(nXy1V=VPDHO`-`LLqewI6Fx@vR3JjL#JFle^DTA;%+V?IG&6!!$ z7VkIUu@`>p)f4iPY?zLR8FGo#>r<~Ha^+E4K&9tKcz(8AqC$tx*Txy!1tq_>;Dhto zZoapgn?y$zb~DKQTjn6gVIj`lE37!d=H@6g;s{I4r(qtB zidv9qR&%-5p}!}7p*?=!+N3>5jx)(0Zm-m+eF2%cB&4P zCz!?Z4iZJ|O{9yk(fy$@byrG?71X7isdBh z+po|z^c85tXbLM6U8qn#4#tc(eB5-gpn1GilCdBW{MCfiDDNxmG!h0GM@Zl};Xs6R zjB0j(9yyF_dPXj@#BQ~60iV0{-D=1s4n4I~i}(>E!N1XN)*^TDl1Bxbs!<|m5T<3t z$r1%kFrUH387)#=s?c{aENddC!b+RhiJ3h<(R0uORg?JSC)4?Q)t! zvPlJd9z9U+-Cb_X_o98mb<`A-;osl0wsi2g9xg$=oK*E}y4f|eg!qb++_@6 z*qT#DPmTfI0l`PRY_M`=pSxzy-4%Mg{AheA^6k{3W)%^ur=;TToC>7xDZmZ3C`>v0 zy;lg)J0QJ#S|uyI@0NwK#v}==pd|5gn|-lbz271Y*6t8nWcfHlRAy+5Qs0e^RcrB0 z&L(=+yxu&w&DYVF7^%lSAPJezD$clm*wwhBu)O8>E}txup!I05L5QU<-=hPer%D11 zpphH#G~r`Jj0oZ15dfsT_x`;&rw^w)4hKeLpS_FMQ4gmA8U-M` zKAI*c$5U*6y(3EolzHhTKm63lH&4K&(D~zduI6~UxmrrEH~JbPZfRG@ygZ_JBZG=F zvn(SOKRV3Wv7GuCa*t2dhz2mW5W1162UNL(KP=n#j%vAlSVPCp&ZUJs)>J1Rg(k$3 zk|;48^p>6LUjs#SGW~;O=(BPLsmCJAaazAh@3(gv^VW9wMZmVOD(F<^lkSN-t#IY^ zB8eov`}|jKozyAtM-?1YG!=^i2gI6>RN)*IPerAW7o}Wr**^U_6EO|iTT7vrbTU=` z`WU9H5UQmk+bEa2Y4MBfRMJSsT!22_?_RV#F-%UCWdo}Rb;ab_+S?K=KNoJzIIWU- z#`%Bq8<>;kF`SFEpAwsJqD+wdM%ngr4`xYIiLMNAi!;jzC$&@8(_k=3tLY`=&Yjt> zFd*&cW2I<)iukJ{+vuCJyPI|XQ#ZD^`>ak|l4LzWiBt(4abnM;Ts;!Y-BwBb7_qGZ zFRZMb+Y2bMwEYTv#@HrNcgft-a(S1fou|G_R&9j9sc@G{IPADeqOS_jqZ$>8-?3<# ziSU&J?}TRJEuGa~NFTJJH(Gv23!?X1XEWwZ4#OcaIN%h){4qs+Ok?ckMUT#SKfdJ~ ztoQWN^kO1#N*V7}jI@T;I3A1(^Czn0zl@_iG!E2%?!HsWY*1rz^caDd#)YyauiU|* z(w0pnW}Wm`+_a(7?Z|}p_oQT2u5BP3p{p<}k+tKKMTvSi%sSyzDKLX9cYq`>zFeM< z+sc^AD{N%M`o4a>|CiZ9C9b=ldjk!Na+$7&!mE>VM&mUht#VL$3UN*#wH{ed)QEQN zdw|!IO+9|kA2MYy>C(#S&Tr%44X<($ks~VMI52^hLIrJ>pvpezZDoOKQqkbFYjYaV zF989Es(M$J)P&W(FU$W0D>oDasc?jcJef-7QxebX(C;9KrBV*aLMS685?WkE?5T1I zGyw!tvfllK1JH`Y=Dt%5B&t!9Bs{AQTA+f*!iMlqD9kkppX;iX3$I?N@GMHkiK5*o zpGEG=fo5lb_CtzWNpttv0_VkX=#-j5ky^O1s%AQSt54u_CvJSi0Uxpj2%}RArLXK z{-X!ZV(2)y?8$MM|1K9p0QMC;wUlmC@;cU<5WJl0skGAojmtNqUeBn)@Qu#NTH&|^ zpFdt9@xD1`$Oq;OkHr@K#}vfJUl|f@E=PcYvqS|{22u}8i_)DY;o#mE_wfh)FSLAQ za~=OFu?=S|`UjLt^O9m6Wl3^31VD(sjc{eY**P)GQtqPGnpf7BPC5KS7jge0P}_nS z_6LzFe6J$yZ4Cz&?+KU1okho4vyI$03fmwMyemKbE?D=&IyU$7pxXkYI19$!(`xjR z`Da3Wyo-$OQDerHyL!H|tuA{xZHvwo)$!m)TbRaB4$z>j@di7`lt6}m1sWghR52dVDYhDW81e|- z40e*-?-2MJY*x`T52xp815ku0`<)!UIyoj+lH0%>7qk<~M1MNyC7rZ2j1`O@Xtn9% zw*J%Qh~AqoQe0d(_J6E5(Rf)qgvh8$b9jrdLkbwfKSR94gn%GMbD_NfbJT4ju%teb zf(xGj3FU^osDR|wOlzHq+g5A<(H%`a?H))rUSRgq58JWSB>^RZ1zwas1~wU3-~HSQ zGYoOmf1!@X6gR#^9MmOFuv5QUN|*7jqRij!1rJ8FRt+FAf_F024K}I_!1qz(FsO-- z&}x|>)!1+QV2_p^K6I^J-Pf0VFP6~p9Y~(_8EZLWi|I-o3_;GxXW<+P>xHY<)1t{= zd)TYR;8!UnxI#kU0fbq89)ntK^}N4{;zFCiS~Zq=H!%PG3yR!-zA&14osB^oByxf+ z^R@lS8mL;wzT0<@_K!Xjdf$7Z`bth1WKrFW`w-p23qC~l-bFdAg_}w!xrroM%h5CR zT80dzU2fLof&CpT0n&1{4Q^f^S>#IbFR$@nO-^%C6v$2)1rWzDmLXs{7@p&cR?mhq zs8_l5aoh1NXCTw2LYyeDTRE_ri)8vW$e=T-Rz(pnry!R~2-nX)H%b8Ql+Afej|g?) z(F?}rmy1-YVI`z~1qvq95&6-_b&RjHDLggo@+bT_Se-hebdUKsG-W;6uxu=)GFTUF zDz^>Rd3+>P9w^nzlLKoKKUls67h!D)gydMi`%7U2-lHSHNE!v!gO1q9yFlenMmk5% zl%=geCDSJF*MRH)=Z$;c7e^*y(J$n{Ye~D$_80Y`H+z=$FUm&@u0s)NIyR2&{Svxe zTS6TS2$G$`FInL}imkcnh%^D=IzzXo{^#$9*c?E&68J%#Q!fk8Q7W2%Z|JQ{mWR!H z7v3GMaGwq*#;rTIg?_~(ixD4!=~&n9%$eAb)*6mrjldA$qVKf z8ql(a?o-voUq3qU(x=3ztHhQx^VEE@%8iUT3~g4uBfrglW`IkPKQ-aqQC#RRR9C*R=WdnD(+^YuI0+JwP$Og>D+{Qyuegxoxve2(3IQs{>W}Hh z^^Yrqns2e%PQr^)W|*GA6s8Hq2u@MjPC!5=rD(1B4-1@H?ofeSxX`gvG6>;jNUQ+W z##+q}vPr7}R-)avBWfl*bbg93*B`!&%k=5PC^(o8Ax2$dbUe zDeA51=yKj#HO0P8>D|g)4V^=jwCBHqHxzEO9I6>SCLIYN%&h%_E zzB=eku_eYvlBt{mo;9}3r_QK28^E*YoWlg(zUJTbX|DyvQb5ii3ZeE4oU*^8l4Dzi zN{YFM1AO&uKu&BpnVW8G8~g%&$_C6qo+=f@BzHhz$-gUkP=u1!mBPNMmjR=u#o8LezM`iYpT$SyBSL&a3x~lIn7m<_)^irbA z5R^7>0vhK8QPDJ7w9bSyKL1#{kNy#r_;kL;dOV8qD5no)u0~t=N49B+DHz}^)-2H3 z{iLfaoz!mAy06Sw_!|zbRRpY^{%+N%BeoKV02fsbZj9(WM4}w$Yzqm5i%;1Ub&^O$V1;DvjN-+5wAXLlP3A@DITGC`Cd!-pc%dJIU`UGMEK#36&lqhw2eqqE>IGFB@qMKNIzZ+EnOuvBAubV z&4y88)Y2Z!e!r03f`f^<78{WG6etG?X^ch2m!k*YAq$df)hf-fEa1U)dZv!uZ9t!N zk?MrTT9FJmJZG|ww*$*P}FxNhN9%EkpG_)WP_rbM3#5PhAThiYwvElTE26@vIkOS_UwjkW~MJOVyZI#3Fi~F?}NYmXoF@{$}?5q=6R+RdTJ;7*vn`~9q zd5^W@5PdK(&#fOJiL7CMGxvy4yU57feS=`B>6r-Hgnvn||2D#jw})JeL*avtuktf^ zVFZyguLv@nd1w-e2xh)TrvRbJRnH8nw50xeHObOKxdi%_ z;QH&%a|lxN{cJ9q_~{p~($;uQd=*H5caVhiLWwD~(9cY?e(tA&oocf^{e)0lKTi98 zb1C61I;$H)RFp;;dsf3BDb2XM5?#z{(j1!~JCUN_XKz1Ku>{q*qEkba&4am%@G}xN zJ8)#ZXaOAK8RSVXc=C8Vusr)H8Bf1$x6-F!Qb|(IJbg`Ep2G>rs^+P_4`d72LIVH4 zJ7crB>kM3%^jvm+MforL{Aen~1A4)9vP;ht{s-d>#jQaUfX3j**rT{y&^bsgvva1mv>h)?sEQpfRS z=YNfs-jrO1q9u}Qa5rjK%`+&2gQg@WbvkDM_nFSY&*1R-1177go2Fn>twt0H)fIIm z!%Ri5CfLmU06q1e5`7zDe=@V)(3PZZi)m^P*0}GzA=-h?WEmD^NdcHCk}^PWRorp_ zAq~Whf@$PZIE>PdnziPoyJKZl@u0v8BBc?k^S(t+al-eX3tT-{?ZPxLW0O+BPTyHrtR)+CwV*iqvGFD=$&lHx|l`x&uY zUgTWo&szYZV$PVJ0U&qu6{&LRrvFf~oArkC2ul-@GkL$RjD~T?R_()^(`(Sit&7 z)ttK?XDGxhOU?E+YJo}AsZrk!xv`kAu2-?mp#BiaYoo7H^<`%uM{Lh(WDUp1W9w1> zeT&f}vB3^=uYc@j5VNuuL_ue#XKEWepcrrq`==%st7vw+z|qMnfE%Fgsbf;7cn zYOYe%&U=#u1cEPxTuIYD31?L1nYY!EFe-@MQ523`%#*?DsJ2`ExU4M*0Nl0~@QRGk zi5@3m&VF_m|=d z8&@sWq~}uefq*ak&AJAQf+0`z&^T|YXiqvwBVzM6pT^VQF-u&9XVeGgco1GRQp^jD zvD1;fAN50(Px%A%lC|PoDFEH1XFR}MFe`nDQaN~_xW#3$uuW)~%jD-r6QA9fx$&RCITz>QrAS{6@?#1x zwy{SF4i5X20)8wAVN+d#-2rMD@c&AI>zto1#Y<)_y+t=dF_>eLU8!k`2$`lZOdnajltGqIwah7)udPaz(HC zgEbK$=Dv}*$X0qb!2!EwN8@r_G%z~MXA$7+-JiniV@b?F82+aqU4r!_+Eb3kDoLL8 zX4`&dQW?_9_P~8=zYUa0>awQlvb3|AH%pF`NXt)yQ8YXuz%iTUnf6?lOR^qmZ)pNj zh5tb~S8T5xcJQZJQi4X;GyCE;uBKNea|_&Yb93OqQs=`g&FFu z2e|V)YqBbKCjb_zi$-n)nvgXa3Z2N#9m<)Vtf7=SKPaxa6L>}!3sZ{@kGf6}t@DJ= zno<4s4qQZ01lVFIrt{!X@)qo?`1S%2%@{5MM5J~>6p;ddf+#sk(bC+98#LdVCh4S# z)9X-`h{uN->wvVk;%W}DHd$R_ypo{KFdSnv{JOf;UbGGTFWxf{Yj+T1koTB;up3WiYEtKF?+~pV#`3#8+FfK5H0L< z32-x8H3o2FGb6j_|FWpD-f>4EksD2%Ib%LE35nl1++WjcvH1SB`Qf0%@jIjwU%|oA zi@XNdamT_WJ~Ba4tz6Ri8BrKh&`i!~N%@zL+iEK26G1$qLhRp(gmfTs-x{q3ma5aP z$D(Y1=hrWoJxm)dOiHZLEeNCb~% zo20?XR^IPdg80EXThVFi@3nQouTW-c*(^7gl7lD6&_GX-ssC`+$YWNskG3oGqEW+$ z#sY=^wC)z}Xl-2)2&8;Dq?WzOS8|k=mCy8}<34kpy=!Jr^)?M zy?WP0HVY>xgjc|whCBXM6k{X~?CZwRINaI$LH($y%%aR1T`^R8y}}-xG5f7KAl!da4k1u9t`CsL%D8KEgAF3bguin0*2q`GB~`NVt9D-S zH1f=3Q4gvkzYL{3Yi*9DmZ#PVeSLpvd^8xZ*286-XAY`1$LGmn?F3IhF=(7aBD+ zb^>_Rinl8!$Yf}m4pF2hV+Rt>paH$gjU_y4L@YG&iW_WeVEEy6RHkerav9S-Z_HD8 zQupLF##^Zw%w;Bwji}GV3BQWP##9kuMiNdoK*kcqGTFm^64Ub zV$3TBDu5Lq)?nrJ@0*&2crU^8GX#;RUxvX2F^ZbE3v`d&Ra`4H#(>~ykcYhZ`afPc zW_TafoD2=v)F zUx0f%8-puQE$wVmD&A*@zRdJn*C^e7`{uXz>`(@DmVxLhc)%jXiCYRmOl_Ho*UYSL zEGh61(>clqdK#h{aw8{1Lyb+ssKhQ#*@ORBatBV>2bJQeuxUnvu2){ovSGxVp7Cv# zw+MD`H-I|20GLfZ;~a{g5ju54=GOFv`XeIXu%@{SIRB?G_j=?HzxxrxrpPX~(NZpf zpVhSJRj>X-fS~o1{EO7D^vrg?45bwCg5$lat#!~8*T0>q4UKq<@pdqdN{aDH%~o3e z6u@2@_3jbdLdfmCDcMc}x9dH^w{_imi>GG`NgEMu-TS=y(e$U7o!dAB9I+BBYNuQ0 zp2B-rdVx~S7}tXUC~eQW4-q++km^l#Bmt3;{6NJ8zw>I0dQsKuDHNN$)mKX-{3lMA(_bl;j}(a@ z)-xq@j@szt0b>#=RSvanQBxXg$f>%$Vr@mQ;g3mrT&_s?b%ua0qnN(mkE^8h-fy?l ztpeI=fQ??JuWr)AQ2{dH_nlCPy;L>bP0sYNkF70ek3?pv9`m7{GyJf}eyWr-{@}@O z5o@~=_HhP4$n`QaSFQBrcpW>tB97I^21bz>2pK!i4Mz|(xof6p3Jbx(#LwScb|ty7 z)@18a$Rl8iOW@@TUR!ju)!G9_B*xI$vJyEAAW4#|j{SZU(4%p~$3B%IXkU{5>YF>+ zO!m-aIO0$3CVbW=F``g-HF5f#+nKM3uDK2kE-+8xbSao_0G$n*r&TG08LZZzOfw!9 zW6NGCeZ@!y6ZvD`n)QHKwq%VP7t&Z>Rf}9Zpne|aF^J#e0(*(!cX&}wW!euCgzT~e zfShn1;M_-D71}T-=O*&G)F-%cB)zrtrJj*Nh8eub3wB1#b{$=0qI-V8UzhsU2qSa% zk*@kvr%dM0_rCk?Mo7G&C6Qu^u*htVC;|R4(-_oA+QfwQb(0fZ62gebWNSm;y`R9M zfw;w39Fu7+Xo^$zCEF~jaA#8Aro!a{G#XhQbQxN{u&V?OR>E=>73P8XKswvG2A8Nz z8S$5Blkw&L+q2WP#*NW@eyG>)aB@t1Y0CU7*^QV@&$94WQ;(Pk)tAuV>`0Adt6e6Q z%4(0wZo3C81%>t8HYZnYw@7t!*q|~$JUdv)XbVG6JanUi7Y@Ht5^a(VrD#PA80`7^ zL-i3bRx8aAr<^vMj~V4@H5F%chC|j=u^M|&&U13Yyx?;(qT7CL$O#kv^73`ric*R> z2+LM5g2?5lBkE5mMPg^2()<-OW?ED9H}_bu&3Y!>KFU?cp0UobKzA0Zg?+23t8a%Q zLb6d1PqNBFEh6@MA5hgO{l1_uWH)KdIQ|W&D3lF6T?i#6z2PdxfL}j8tK9{4<^PzPHU~BV(_6O)T z=N-q*x>0C_ZCr2gy4BXi{YkxqGG}oCnMu}=6d@nx%~yrbP)DnbbeSZ!^?&W zG}oTJ;ChSqLV_g9B>m;2J6KdRADGDY=F?QNZjv7DZ}lEt^{2>%#fS)K7}8-_<-+P& z@L020B15h=%|pLiNA#5D;zB+@0Zj^_uiz;OTp=M)xKqIxCazS33!9h>kF zP7ozq465KvN0ZY%hk*+`2=;Wx)jJfPIo1hEu%iQu82ahur^7^?gV*K{V@bIn8T_iK zXeKp^qQQYdvZp~jIvtba8?a65(G zIYL&BoV0-O(OMFki#`gAk#H)8>0ucbYbDquI=#ij^M5*u8e^=a8Vh(2II%dN5l`zv z9)vV|u#iRf)rUtT+{trf#G8}>r|ka}Yx$M=$UvI4Ld3-vE!p)cSq(AW{LnGDmFnDd ziW>0WzcZtH04N^nN)LPnhtoJuFVhvN2I#*S*=&I5Td~BY(~L6KO@2EI#WJo@|4K}#s33XK&QXY8FINwM-~12yURq9!Tb=+W_YD(5F_%)CzR!D zDaANZ>HMsM(2dGXrMUwNBqm#E-$EixoC^ZyK(0h=f0%-IUj9mWNF{t*hb_qFV~-;l z=B8^mX##3uKb2Civ`F-+*6W987+lV#_BaR~yYLmKqW^pWVn69uFeFTR0)AtNXJPf_ z{$F#Ul8nE`xl(8Xs$;xx&w=Jw64U7TbihYsF7ApshgdpEO1Ucwa8{%Uw~TSd831jF zOe+yZf1y@nNG&n3)gpOm7AOJTFE$_%_UbqUa8y`_=YjSYcitTXi~z&Fs4>08@MMfB zdi$*(zx%`Ex88dE;B563T|)3!h0ix_yEakl_w|Op&9GldC|#EQPWiCID6=3L!fh$h z)EkrL3J%D2DRzJ4#coB1l7j+c4c8^b!XeSuf3en(L2e0REYQHb14Abau|Hv%039RI zcM~b1!NAv6J+KH?3ZEDYvnS~YpR;kN+Jn~UV2gbeTxt(g6x*|I+UxO%=mF_{Fl1cb zVzc(Z_E_U(9*kXrn5_A#))~pr;@z&(Ugsob>AR6qE&YV2Yq1*xM;06L9tH@lZT-z3 zf2UxrvvI)AaCl1j9yYu|t5 za+LB#(uC5S0*6|Ro+!`AGZp7in4;k6f8TW*d&^H(3l{E}Ps0!gXAIUC6&olNGYOXy zhn(KR3oc`r)Cr+0vqAzGV_P}>Jzcd_VRfNp~Nq?Nw7e{R)(8VkTg&pAq z&?Abh4L0{HSm-Qn_ED3#1v6?tamUkf^UnsGVO(u~I!7mMZGhNm_lrb9E)G!0&OVg=_cRIz1-#-sSSIfi!T(o8FZ8VHA z<8;Ct$>Ht$`<73K%tmAe=H~&>K&@YKe+J+BmbWUQ9UmrsBVRmW^9_k@e@gT`?7AIE z0490!!gM+sjmKwT=D0$Gx07VR-AfFvzWEmba@?!Prb>DB=H=KiwKQy_Cfq7F215a< zkxCoRjW+fhMA4gAbuDFb!8-PYDOVIm+#TT9<)Vf9iuNmeh*5oi!P#^PzofR*!0H6i zN@EOxF9@CCcd74q8+~!$n6?{gQbXJ?G z%1boOwIfhsT#XQprzy@e~w=KQ5^PPEIw_&qWHP7g%Q-v{4he&EDYV!%4Z1U!^BwFJ#CQIW9}WsMAol!cguF z(YAcfqtact2W>f2T_ZD#Gp$Nz?hDX6iO#C}`YMsI2*8%h_SyvT!@n+TULdVh8Lw|| zC0Xx#9I?%ee|*Y73}q~-`*AIn7(<7GF=O+=TQl!Hmj?z6CaJ~V#`YU zg6%15`S85nNXFTWiuC>&D+=bE>8Ot$`D%PPuXZ5Me}G`P)_GfdlO{P|hlI8e%h=pm zBj&x3%4pxy-N*!i;4w6c$p))LWNF0^iVAuEF}8D6iZ$Bcj=gJ%v7 z4m6@E4|Kc~dtc95RPsw)G4r-gdP5!gzLn0W3tI}Ga{ZMAuf4NS-`++4-Ukm{;#a4R z@Q7C-e@3>^M7+mZA_11x z<&=BwE8u;}gTSXzI;%l&kPNKQ^2?#%YH??&qvm=YfyRE#Vi`u9kze8t(E*plro?|0 z3gKOxf6Ni|E)%D4w|Rl6#mC9Ud}(bK;(Y^avrEF*!Eciqxo4HXxJ&VM?)FNFLj-$S zeb5i>BXMTHH__S_+@%K z{v5-jme;qItr*MyH>#NxjDU5-aq%Ky6$Y6(2XnHS z41Ly=GVSp2Y*`6T%%BQ0BYU(`t5jwhe{e?&pu|8HO0IFX`YaOEEDB47zQ1+Y?ExgY z&x97&PPkjEKeN0XkLZv|Y9o^M2D3~wR=!_8L77wi@X0JaJY#%lW0u=|;79@qI-tlP zm@%y+qR9+t6Jjr>rjZn213zB`WjJI`1=u;rgr|M5&@6yzghPKNq#=H4#jV(ce^~3v z^Zc&na%-euc$`h-nG@00zG@WF!%|?JPY-j0obkSry+pS1VYLo3$l5+5`I>90 zGAu8`d|6}@L>&9@#Ngx@MwRe|4p!*18F;E|egI{3vW18vb`BGy&4-jEe+-xbbL3H$ zgyw%5_2#==h_iMrpOQTcG)NIpzBZfboNE_Dzq>SwU zCR=t|GEOP-Hjyy~2@0J7)Z1kUie$=gfa|`;@w@qBDV}PGRQRjkGJQl7i6KD~`0kJ2 z{o&CE?=z#;-_>Z;8T3qvfA--1fN~Nzlmv5z;@7d}=2Gyd) zk9w1Di5)E!l`69Q2Vh3}Z{OI3KK(e_;3;`#obXJ!?&p{FdC0g1f9Lsi^=`!m7^*cR zkce9<7*Ff0&9#ntz=G%5hJIryiNwwhphgqt+!#B2!LVg^lu}z{T(Atovn+q3df?cq z$}C3LK|bv6U|1N|lTpO$kaK*O^wifNrSUFRVpTG}$!%Ll@9Dk+pry&tuO|9BJ4C&V zAZqJ7Rq9`nA^qipe_Z^~=pgCKNsyRn+|+GwcImo@k*g!wnHx&OMUQE>lO8vW;VLTu zF3B|9$nqg!PyAXOz=0BzqQp6c1ry;Hwat4vWsn>6?WC=kAy>mXzuxgBmgIBM4)o@V z^?~WR3!PDHyj()gJjh^x!OeoV;ZKRWKRVxBufrKB1>9&aL%-kmx!*^u>`kQcebWNZ zsY`#TW^g;Le@^<&ki~#FDeA7H)xTpG#7A?`D25sH^8mljQ*^s}0GwMupwni9E{`Yj z0aiJ5@*N0+%h2t5D*S7SOW(aHH;PMJ0L)5pfBr|X%n?8#m`8Lj!so80NMI$;V6`L& zS$|RnTJ(BM9ZviOHrBC&@#OshZ~pk*|9-Gy`R9Ble{3gG1_(+9z;CZey;_?Dxm=tJ z2$OKL(c3)#A%0eij^`bp#@JO+(&Ah1kd8t3AmN}5!GQU;Q9)F!i2d;W!nEnSAX5h z7y`1VfA8KmecH`;aipCfLp4e%nOc$l%k_UJ(hOihdt7Z(9M;!uDNMP_jei`s^nN&a zN1gHsFKyp)8mbL3=_}Rxi2351vR~+3FNz6NZA_b%QB=v}>}oGx*~_2W`SO zBIRt1Mxm3wnSh_(&`AvX77qa<*M`{+e`-tXpe0*fUHVCiaOv#*qxd~CtfrBi{~+Hp zkrSTuMRwvaKB%9gis{c6;!xc<^mHogmQ{`)^i3pe2T}#^Zq@VL#`M)WfhN2Vp zD;|CD!8_7a_xOVk?%QB~0-G{$mC!M2dP2>T0+Q=t-Xm*##OxX292I$7wKp3rfAL+R za11J{`z2lHoRGvEE}8)BK+m**L^__1ZHzW=0DNQVcD>VlTSj?8v_;ImzP z3_9g-m64Y)58-e#`4h>Lh@zNNuuYPupvasQBVYQSMW!!@em^2cv=Xw|Guf0GaA0W!hl z+S;IL^NHnWotJ3M5|~qEBZ^|p)LI&FCB8d3q8pi{C}_T`vabczogVVf0_F5ch?P|j zmmk=TbJMQOXow8&M?uVk*(qQbiNmgrxf>9M`5DkidRR2%8=o~Z2L8JtO&1sOrB_35 z^S#-X7vF&|u<6U~))7U?e-J-mf{IfhA3`y5zz$M2q;a3Y{?o!vXywPNBrK#{9b|hv z*yIPP()!Uk3F##{1HY@=P2u{pW4B9amgZ7lL(8>ie#x7qvAW0|RasUJ;c4$ONQ%aY zt-sp;%w0+2DPa_x&aK5xUQK&Ail_^faY!*1d(~fHvP4XjAnzi>JAk%8z;!YOsCE|`W-}wTL&jT-ls%) zS**crqc-9}T2}>be{z=9kiaw?p(ToG0xYD|JPU=E=Y~BWtg`bHWnf*XT5MYAS=+jm zT?d={HpdNkFp88!StwQ8#3_JboMAXJ9VXhK2k+>I^V>{4A_>2Pt=E#!47g&@Q`C+e zDzTT?uiUg9-Bm@)OiS9V1+^o(xvQ1-bl1lW=2gAn5VW#>f1`wO364ykWZp zdh44x1Z)ZBL}rAt8c$}`R|Z`22puUUy9u-74DPffS@h>TO7$IB+s|w$xMKtZ;)h2G z3hW`G&Hh{Fmm0zG>6F1&b(}~FQE6^osE$LOo`NH05xNW)x8kI@(-3?v4g!(Qu4E`F zoM$>m4;9d6f2>T|40>T0QR$3pUUiNO1#M+(VARh0X)M#En(Vfs+h#N3-MDwhD<{0O zd?&*g%nURk%`20~W9Xt{zd2PXOyA4Y6_Qua+0qBkGCfB*jb0%Q8+1JsfX!yOqr`)P*` z8A+x^W_W56754fSZAMeL)c;OTZHJRgb=8*n8c59FoN zAo6uvP8*;f);3-^;svwZO~P*_cco^6hA|TpTc)+gIEFNwIep^NXj4s?8&x>!r&_!8 z21LCxwPJ53@k~1^gK|8|3H?+#qk9?Ia}u$je;bxaam&rWk#RPtihMP3=3S!8VlwFa zeaF>H(?wq=Q~R3IM2{aoNIR+&DeUW#fq5|`mYs@|>Mzc9q=z_P0)|NyHXBc?Y{@^B zQa*A0=d;1Vuhgz8PNJ&U@j$cprku3M0zRqms)?lH#m%zphxm(5tQ39N}`!i$woV4A|$e6H9HO< z0o3PPevtW^l1=~ zXm!0aST?>EP&B(8IL)PDjBDG>WWWXnaQHi)meenD5L}-b%Y7~|A4n^apl8iz{)Ns$ z=X>E;HOVQ<05$ zxr;)`@~!Xiz0d_B>TWy1~Sx3n8EH|!U!^jpEoE)$T8L*h5g{uzPFFETdh3yg0BN_G#e;_N>d5W0k z84sc5JgY{ry7wnMPhWuj6iLmrQxTcZen8|rKb-M6M&qOErjY%>BW`_C9wZ=2ePipb%R73&h0{dSO0V%n%GhuH_h*BOKNGyk4J) zANtO{!$dy`@a*GMKMwd=e@Uyr6>e#5y%oHo`F7MAwTBE?>zD(Rr3OSoN|J^u@m=1@ zN~pi2Bw--Ps(RQ`-gI_&9>zxBA~u>Nh=vrDFUp$yeRW0fv8b0;S&B#qp<>Wu52sM7 zPdU7=%IZ=o((@=h9kM6Ja2%VhO{1tnTcXGWb;Lu$j_?FN^fO__e;{AgeeAuJ{0Jru z@yc_^$5l%J@&`x6Ja?Z9KXX%?RZ>UELjE12nT*|sanH0Cqw|$xPmpDOL(03GOC2yu z(f~(7vN@o3rylkp|2g@rck`c5=~j(O`K`PVQbz+#Ut$_Pm`0fM2566>wJSIqzef)2 zSSMzQw3s(4Yyghce}~`&ppj}8-N=1fgww|m=Pa2ufSH9ifvIm&0dMY&>=y@9`cZpc zAvI;hnwY3aOd+(L78Xd^I!T*E0;z(Q>d5lR#59m+BX5t8r0xBd@aS|>f10M$$xVx}8cpN|MS`ZV z%4eO7LVr*`flyq4&H2u7TrAe6-Mcf!BILWTQs7L^prFmE51Sk6gR`CESuP8L!@2<=m)#j8YWS z)?X8IL7WUo%1|&Z6pP%m14!204Z>USkiQ|(+me8N*$w4#cZJ;IVTeIX9BGwZR~XR9)$5T}I-2jw;7X8;csp{V|MAk~JlEe|fSN8AdR2P^7I7VqiJoj?4)W z9Y^l%OH~gURko|AX6?(MDVn6|qpC;AAtfA^l8tgR*3HXHp3-_mN51|>8bjKK=2*^S z&u2NH4Av^g40cAwDk@W9R;JW(6rqiGqZn8vpHVjyNGkd)51ixHFG(ZyXciY!@LX^X z^EA$ae+5eC{%rLRZQ{U)UTD12QXlY$#e0*^*{3Wb;EkmRdHmL+_a78O<-cA^McBtj zIO5g>>u1!3ae$h5ZR(260YWG-+*rME$e+IkgJ z?Gz2|#%oI&#gB^&#OAyr(j735Ec#NJ1fESUe_xdR7D+rU97ZyY!tHsq$Z>!>@2Wyd z^Lo6D3@3OhH!#{kSmG$a0dC^1>FRje;F%lG$qbhbOkUYa6M{^0ddW@wHs(5EWGoGd zylb2mD@<(X))uz-+ zf6Y;Rq$O^3>5YIS1|G#-dui|aXnw&05KrcPsk`K%Lxlm_UV@89I!0x7F?Xz6bL?jp zek{1Tc{%ulnRKRalEL34sp1-jN@`g0006#0B%^qtnv%6OPexi{F)doAg|1WE!1o{e-khDTJ42EW}QPd?vY$eVm-Dc;O>QVfmcU9 zP{r=Jp;Ou@&y4-~{p6%I`xOHOEt#ebo%;wYauHc`GL@GsmY`tS(UaIxhJVm%86^o4 zRDO((h_}%}y2pAyn<9Gj0!S;dAaLuzLM$B86 z?sjvy=`=UOS;^$rw#f9>bD+1fON(R=@fv{jFk-XU-4li-5o)BY7S;>C{8_5&BlQnY zC+VNH0$3An9zeno`5Ks$YlxF^e@UccpKuyxiHt2mBLY_U;y#qsUg}PeXLE$ztV9qo zrb>h`q@I44`=ihXI>PzWQ9@nI6Q>?`HjtEg_&P_|mYmtMl_bn=Bh`!r?X@J!HGqCH zf52-#zH8|VgP^-kj-j06?e`n3HaT~|w zfrc=()p%xH@8!=JJCzm2NSlJqY*k$DH&R3p^V;r>s|zbdKwJ3ix*<+YDO>G_mU;iM zBpHASjV^Ci14@ANn3Im{KT94Dkul#U#H8`)a8uVzj_BGh?0l3x9iyyeGE2%i!4~fU z{eaSON_T$AXTi(3GG|5_e*y9wJjLPM9+=djK}Bv%rh#+5%J)U$MS5gghC;WtBd-EMzazHMs44HDcu>xF*OyuQBf8vT&-p*h%V}ibftd6ljJjsQzyWS_OzR9;mLtj({evq46Vppj zs+Dx+K2z3IZI4U#e_@E&D$<|AWHxV1-!;K{OI&Rr&)eH!I&JYO;^omm6W2`Je)b^$ z;t{wZOdsYjeQggt*twJY67)^0S_x7Q%+KXc2`vq4l#0k7ibe^ob6MyEbxnc<_f3?-c&sg(=FapFgWnK$J zBmR7BMN|zI(wufND4>}w^OK}4e$gBjnLT5Vc;4k|frFlr+h*1pctD5^uF6K)jX}Oi zYgqRsP)mBWhe?vesf?RZe(PI2qvA(ze=9Nfm(D(*M`&*mu=~(`x&o39aSKD&IU>=rAWBNL=_J*s(^LPz9>Am{ zwJuO`Z z03s9p)r`3yO~unS{Wxz0KG2%PE}`@;D-n83vY2&9e-z4YSVrlH0Jjc;0q&7?nu-xc z%5tv$Y>D%i3zwQo3HtfiP8{x3b)h$0tc<~7Pv7v_wp>YExyTi5WMVQhkXDX90IU53 z<2prYv|=ZxE6E{{t{;pNJc`~42X@X!;Rt7hb}uF-?*#cYGm-IjC$;DNBza5O2Bv=3 zblY?T3y3{AyRX-S5j{^;uIh9mZER zi-3sA$1KA%zX^<;}kgL*Azu3no__bMqKN zBS1c#gn9^3=qtX#(%?c2=SFH|kZI1*QI4ys_F2+BamVgvpSd7pC%slbO$LS{6Fc=b zE;`Xb6jDHwq0Fc#N3OzR?phz>`fuw!Uy_qv@&v*`i-zu&3;Z&6R&pFDhDp&-i9sW2 ze+ItxObK_fj^^b&VJDI6U%jC#E$&e0-k@y9u|on8aIguJW*~A|JTQC$2>_D(vXW4J zU#%fU`W`VuJ5Dtp?bDsqFUo#ff5*;2%y{JJv7Gu&+O;{dp$#ViV2fu!Ckt9N zD+~G9T>=oy14Y)7hdSJA02&A1+|RM+UzKF7E=}RD-hA}#+mE@y|K0cAdyoybN1&B; z-<++!N@>+rx;B*V3Z3$^*pEkAQ2g~Ua*)QU5vWUON{mibH<*Xitlm`9$7GGaf9cN8 z!|*_-6v37P|Js}F%Rc=j84PCH^q<$zT@ExS^kUX+TMpk$k@M8Wwf>SZMy8dtX!k*8 zqLUjIEn9NMTq+R2_Uga>AldpM=X*#yroGC$)Mawu<8<&Z^NrR_k+f|_AJUSHc1I4V zf52HCq{PL#Hi)0XlhhNCn5WhVe?AdIIvnE`znn47Irr03)#OHoJxUkkVjIF0>uxev zAG5D*le!c(u;AFcu=JSPG>d|rmw7oZIe#A}M68Il(DlcvST!ruf=!5--o$n46tRNF zO{?47`*eD+EGb3V8czF|ETyS}%)?_CtYaWKj^DWwV{mrF?%h6l54y3fe}u<-;Fr7B0DCleuwkl@nvE49!|fSnl9Xwvp5$g4y3h_8OYv_ zGK>^+jKd&Fr9sZ+y({~VIZd9ZZyNUA_)sszplg%j<*@_8&Gd3xOlZ2DI;dBe4T}8o zf}7Kc?MB6?4$CpOf61rsSyyX1hDDyct6Rm+$WY_h)eb{rboD|cH3+M&R{1r}cl6;S zqj%Sn_q3GzUxK7*N|NlczEiKkM-P1y6G|lEto<RMVG{`WLx#a)0^`4ck(P^3J?=cc%o=V2NB! z&N$tB-+Jy-Rd5TW=xgr(^}WW&xCl$VV!MfhQUB}EwEJ_1@`7ZWuw_agJSkR%{FCds zqIR83jQx+fe;k{wl0mSdkY8wN6>(PLfPm)L(V05I6nzoCsGpxJ_r-Lmw3nb`1iYk> z1x2Oco?$P$92TL$Ur+pEq`jzOpBQKxR-g79sr;SHGDk!pVaKIxpBt8=BN$sF>lol* zeo0#qyEhewsEpi7%a*#@zm`rT)B(oab|T%mWv;{_e+^bgih#=zaf}V8M5R2f6+b3r zkuHj^whWrw(huK%$X+F=QI%$&gCpYxtv4-rcxB$T019Lz8(ocjzpFURiVIkH2qCL( z+f-oS;cmgGVXRa@TUmWGvHN0^1ewWU4eFM0Dk4?grsvkWRRY2TI?I>P0d5^A$`os+ zH^K`hf8#ST*XHJB!}x+>g-LXak+NSiDJ6^Y>g&s3I_C=<+Ujm`(nmajrDT4MfBHuX z6My*QDPzNr00_Cj;Gy{-HE5!T&OGf|HwYq=*f5R{5p*Npvl18y&CS1GA(on2dTq;& z%2`yW^;*Ukg)}0_x6yknNWen0ezL$a_IX)t ze~v|KCwQ>|j^~W8AfqYg833gBcFdmM8m31aGMw3%PK*;JxUJkc1<}QxCvHvDSQpz% zrOw1Fv)n8)V-eS*OoH5TYrWc$yP0kga|0!x=%+d1GvfXmm+gF-(~vyvSr6JbKtW4J zU@y$x}K!=~y26QJw4>ol542Pz4@*VHK-QfZawf3wee zaI{Ay`6W7wFVQXm-fWwcvfNVKPPn6QBomk2Y65x1sjce}u@#nlNz`bQ&FDK=MoCsi zRyjc(57s-?sWy(C(qPp>P@1s1RoN$2YW_t!b&Lm)X&+H~6%EX&g8S(eh+IeLo9)3~ zck>^OFlOI|2N4iRqJSS<_ZT~ve`}eqlyx3tqoA{3!*nX+Piw2c9YSbLQ6I-qMCB`Y z_G#X*Fq`aM4vsLSc1gpnLc=&-B%HGE>gLW&3FNz1}D;f6qBJ?E?rj zIKUZL2M={0vRqZ0$1Mt!J0*JisSSFe^)Us&;>p7qP;q3^wlb3LGx6n%ejlFA-XB}W zF!+I1!(8zKr4A+?*3g_IoMT*4VRH|fHZP241|vg9>*$(&!XxXr5?Ij)q@)7@89NLe zK-B&{LO&-ylJ`BT$f2v%f1OrG@dExa^N{riaQ#s)#u3$$ZfNLqO3xdK;m+7QGn{19 z#k@F3(hXcZwwc#t6!GrDs^m&IX^LX?cU{jT>;y8(lR`dt50gSZc0K=yQE>CW&e53Ma_Rc_;pYFPfA_2ZlUC^GbnV~9Ftgx> z*zCJsmn1zyhmI;we?9u(?GGO8lN~R+zpqT|9^ z$h#bOPw(=YiGY*leF1$=-pX{|qT%-RH+49@#e@FGqP~0iql7PO7?Nz=} zE#FzQgEW)+rd%Z-ilcC%bb%RUW<8`DXHD*|^_;HotZal1Q?l2r)TLofAE{|*J7ZSB zhbgD^CfiP%IFx5<5ATiC+6H~7X{x*lgSOyCj){D;MidAoumx}lmM)HO4>sy9HGvMU z&cKk*skdete`L`lh};=NyKe)sHJX zV;pXLQb>S+`bx zlx87P0tuh)#Lqf}G~I-1mK+^d!yV9}4ep9n)#&KJ1u}rC#eB-AW;nf9^;KwS+kXFT z*=~-gJ}9#~utP)YkB0&D?XBK{OM}f0K&~a8S|887mw7HW=*DkDKVZgf2(rj+w6Mpw+h>LgokjiK%$I6 zU#FH=8zW6o>A=}ILPVBLLeg=GoI$kYP$E%x@1ZNFzN-rYEwi^gUfIUdP0$1eD!Ql~ zD0e`g)Nh2DHzAE1SASD|lh9%qT8gGtjWpePe?C{uS0t9N%<>(!cL(OQXgdmhm7>oQ zZBgePPv+?Af&ajOM3lJUE8e#)%vuYCUk1x0b(AcjlT8|TBmr`Qxc?aYVrUcp31ceI zs!gQGx8u(q&6Cw)icyyqKH`kfs$#stn>%(`WO5W6!jh3b7;LYTd>)9;x^Rww&tbb$ ze{fe?f8%EB(1mn`v0QOB?R?tf+Bh^bZ&F?wDiTy}+2m$PrI%2r!zz3-S^73zE{y~g za^agc6=?QOw@Z(!?o)L>6voH|w`%n2*oNO8R{luLXUQ?Y5+`&X{z0ezvLWm-+}F?* zj(SXdUn$ISNJN{#`(-tmSlQ(wYCS|oe+x2VD6uqUze(Mj&KWHyi@y;C(Anb13bZic z_tw5FYe;ucuU!>{%RT`X=f~Ojl;O60wP~Sp6}i!n!ad(k>?SyD&--hJ0qxgj_X^u? zGb^QJDn+jXHH% zTP(I=5jKzrzFiVZe#)ln2e`_-+&q&CliRIt9N2#A98A8SxYa@)KyDl6z5k@aHBTus z>q8zukhsS_MU?g$Mlh`5O7ak?e%HU@95!TDM9KqC7U75nkZLL_F1`acGO^{8^jL@VaZWHD99M6hf6S{4@CsrV zfcNYKl|t%8a*Quh14(RRTZgpM{rQmW*OB%@I9y$k zxUd8Hn#M%L2F>P#P2-<8nG+hG^H{!K6|EphNC4Q9{7v1U7!!#*cvSK`GP(VO2cBP9 z9aLXz0`~%-D|O2}>FoRle;K7RYCvlBDPzOJ8-qx^psYrLL0u^WZ{p~Ht%(eqFxZi` zU7Ex}#1=-OYNz0r9aB-JV1%E%+l*m}M(3egWWn}kvT}qE-FRow8u4O*YQc?-PNa{! zFY;$O%-H55n#|FPg5q?mH8p3=>Dc>N6&M`b@Pemfiqdj-c`XAwe_S#9h)0biS=MI_ zvC?Mpv=<2zLk11xQ60~NQ{lDwh5M9Hn1B&+WYv%f7v2`^)zqNY3fV+l&W? zDW<2`yFF;BY%nh@SO%ePqo;T56Toi2`_2QWrkOKzadisMDpBVU$J=3jo8nyrsn z#z?^7m^EO1#2+4jHCT3+c7w;7|Jo!ZPVeC@CmkIl+!;n+OPeMcU7hzc( z??cuv>ZQ!BFZV?VN1dZ0y+%HeJQJ%;2}D?FVpklmR01BZhmlFvquaJ{_LU8a^h=zai(@u!nHRCUEQeF8MN75Q zBmbq0X}b-uqdh^xH|Rf?YT9OUtz(PgYS*rCe_P)3=c(u?j?BUJ>O^>YI4-TEH>pKt zHE~*Q+|yVY73?vRmklw0F{1{Qe2z749`kT%Qc9jxIOf)aOuHj_IjtUINY0E2~#quN*reszqFYHNv|m30<=!E}_`_wyu(& zfB8Hz0#IlknEb=~LPtjMq_9G>oQ0NJ0n$@smVpupt(r%5ZXl#$j8YQ$zoZN z^}`X`!Kk3r&0tESFiZwW)XG;(3!JbJ{KYM~+P$ohOQ>1|fx0}8tV6Q}$T)=d&uaO6 zA*qspI8%Ftf%;dwtng+gDv(}1py?p&e_2?R#W4HzzyooJwNfjub!WcwtGxqIr3|6= zVd-|~(<+Ap*ctiu$HIPR?ybyblnEx1xUQJo+K@D^S`>peYXpoq1q14<+7ckXC0(Vk zoE-TKiXMBl54g-lHq6By+8uy|PPQi4lx*TkcB0-ooyd%eMOJws^!KU z`Z8Ks<)~I&$79iByL|*LnswMPDaTM8;+T(*JQmV>^db&>;>q<|gSTE) z{Qc8iq!_&}-O)zr>fA;KTUR(rx{2$ z#N0$*XyuwdXn*(<9OtLU=C^Fu^OQ6n_tC=VLR?Kz^hL%lZ%#{}Y8~5IF@G@<0~;l4vc}^=-TFkT&rO_glhjfpH+v7k|#4`P4bg&AUX z9pPfMDZwYED30$NLtn-kD8l^zwpryuvEWL249e%Jo=4vmgHThwq)N_)YPn zOfd-e`<0C*&<+iGbVQxnOg4zA0*g~Gc@nBwA)Y96>H904J*iOp@}TaX&NnJ z)s>qPT`2Q)B$yQ5UtLWrW8_BRoO63R*O#NyAxw!#ToUj*$B3(2%Ew9xJ|aV>a)p$f z{O-wf*XQV`y0yl|h_=aT3$2ehOw0{S*UpHUf8cd1iLc#}4cQa}BWb&y&b4$l8klUz z=8(#`ru#~$kVW~VY_?_FK72~<@HJCVz59sgLjCal<6pji?~|c!WdPY9;tXg#x?0VV zu>J=G4g1CHmST#z^{H7+S9Xd7TTT7!zjQ!#Mou2k-ZsX6E$Nuz3D zaF3%UK7k8j?cElv>$7Vq(7=Iu-@-$0f9s-^Z}h`#VK3R2@7V%GDZgMY16@pE^bAHp zR7=}V9G<&$G{S$svi#t^dsmhkM(J9)>{jxf7h*!Zu9c?OJFXXEjjNjcD4C(hf98P~ z>fR|VH=gD+{>Ye_B!3qDGEG+{ohgd(zW2ZvRESwX z#ajL2zT=TrC>ec)4u@IzCX{~7R4;F|CurMr-3e{hcVK$4F=)?WEbar!Z+Y1gRli%NdC)p64alEJUX zX{d>|LfTMbpaakS;zB(4EG>w9Asa-{Ao0VXvOjH$SfEBlYE)dIBg>KvUWXwVrCL zWJn4^1GGdDB80{JWo8IicX83Dfe7@GCa3tsL_79S89Rr_I`2F=)SioU$Dl>l0~NCq z3WYNVQf*8d$<$wA>c_~_f6ifdt)7q|fp~9KFYDeyb)$L|4VTLXA5n0QWZyp(tfd&dsQRbZp zq?`951B*u@ym`)(0UFfvXGq_rvfPXyV}FJWr|B{iB-1CQvJBo79T`fprq54TF>Ue^JeBoa&@L$DSwVx$xca zAED~cgEM_OwF^uDO+d20d*0lsT^d0X2zS2v^1LM|)lQ874y3lAnX_oAP*C8>b{InR ziUCl9b$5mr#scvYP_`bfK0_DFCvs@HblG;S4F{Ds{t&HlA2=C>_mkI}Ms_*ROVH_+ zes~X-`=Mht%sF1=;(yK+`q1?v%=@Q>aYf~FUX=JSL+dyX3E#@yK-e8%xS#S_0o$cG z#jPWywei<*LAz?~^F}YPJTh{&!J)(t=m?agW*ByvhNzrBGhHDVbsHA!CI#Nl(7f2n z7eG@2f1Q+J%&o*pOGD6IlYzFJN!fvRw$TYNwO07}vzZEvcz|fq> zZ|K8ExME9EXn(0mupYqVIVbh~Z#_si-{J6#2gQ>*8WCsZPD zT94TY%Y(_tXQv}Tb5=V$Lz7Lw7;4T-*F4+{R@L!Z8YecIToUSYuq27+jj~gX3{+C( zTBlSP^cbS5D9^io?XX71#QH?DrH5GPle1(Bll{pOm49**IKH<`*a~gS5ffL;=`%IE zld;dnY}y|58tTMBtz%D?sz}LiPW`N7n9+6a0}-;r7JC}94?vqv*(4V~?$%Y+=P3!j zfS|z8BotvaX@tqTqbW>S=VBy9igW$eAyWdh za2OeFB&y>u7v-Rn*EzZpL3RLvdCM5qB`Lz|7_c~%Xn9o8G%`a{&{ib_gt+lWCVTF{ zuB9iEr6SHD{oUowpLEF&k0G_y5J)IFbK2X@9DjZDFA5g-nrj86a_E*<@d}uMZ19@s z#C~{ad?%?5`p-2c^Q=*Cm3BZ$j3zbWJZOcVr*T#{FE2Q(zPiWpCo>F)cw&LqAE!gZ zYt9G$miL5{2Vr8`<-NzwP>3LrkOF6vUm) z8h_=nnu89_t3VT<1$+CmJ2UZ0lqfR|mwf6%QWnD@RbDf&8Gf|JP~d)}uc&}p#=Gi< zZRgCMRewTeDkc<4$d+0pCvAr=it{bI>gccLEaN0`Bd=CMgX@SNG3#Lvi!fM1TeBHz zL-xjQCOMn8WNN58z%u3Y!dwGuhS1`lm45=uAeki{FJ=yVqEt220<-m(+)???*&`j; z$(GKr4rK~GJK55gfE6upCIz^9sI@YQb|%m#Qx}Jq$zvaq>QHAn~+JPkVypA9=Ohp?{dj)FS8`RKiO-hbdG zU}n9hbuR-VZ~mw?<0|9~0!_J^v44TfYDiXfvq1IR!pSLRN&ulvTWeWC+%`jV#!!VYnkA_?lD&ez!?O0+s+220`Y6fR@{I)%nP zqq=nDI@!D%o5sghQ+eNqM1P7br-Cj?>rlh?{H8lUx5J|F=61Y|$ZW;1sjb!t7D$DJ zdPgX0@ezXdMTKNC*Bml?#YA@x^sfzKkz$=;15+!7O%PzmqThMv##j8xjrD33@`7NI zc3r(5^cAh!XcgpR8OsU>=waPNEL-Httx9mVG$#fof5Bmd&G#`XG=EYj=b&@)E{9~+ zL9ng8PPsoU^L@HOhLT0QC!HG}*>tuPeEex7WcazJo^;tieO|2Id2r9#;fvC`2{?B! zH8SJ!N;@)l$hDY%z^o=#aM<+`$SP;w4H;vYmy1%p%-_6hxgTNa>7>OY&vQ>eKC&9vXnv(}l*1ED0Bq}iF|#IlITqYR zCYn2%0q-a>~}QxkM{$YbD2-&tmAx^p~$VDL+JzC7T;ieT!2DoS+0)`#b0 z2Y7Lg(U(T_l+r9qgiuQVGSF+U;(BbX{c*c#0)rN$xqyQp>m)Wvvu1y^e;6$Y979?M zx8}Qqg);zrWz-%_uKj|ir)XSYVQMC2oHaw747q6;fPYk2MKvB99qbY8@XHUZ`;HrJ zKxZRJ4}IgArRH4iRPsjLRyOr4vTz>1;3j?Zt~u$wsnO^$VJzV%QnawFa~?UR{*7_dZSfqK=a(@+#M0SQkb<@)iCfBK23aL@!v#*D|D9`FS#dmii15 zq(Rm>HVQ1cO-yw=E*D6uT!}MS&5&ZL+c@{sNUxJ;kq6L{l^Zz02Srd-(>8)saxWue zpD_c{*4j}AwZ^0rtt31ati|2=VqR%TC<=)^B7aJn5ZESY6aC`Qp}?91buEyWtgZ%7wsd2bQ(s!rkix~D z{2tA~a3IVTBDf>Ufn0Dxs&#YWnFo<12fg@)FVaT&;{T`aZFVF{t~1eBiPZ%gh^m>U zG$W}BP=jnXDb8(*qMDkSyY!6k%=D&*M}M|^c&d^sZneGIY5+nTv89DJ+-cVZy+}RD zwex-F96M(2Syhbe8`T5|uq!h%!o%I{*!lT>0Q-N4raZKC+jo`&pX=JOCgt7nx>NL~!E>(pdUP53{%vpg}vzL9byFGNL z(??4f1$)VkiBA3ny8zx%-6uch}FS*T1L7YMwW4v+s&(rJpBJ0ets( zpRoXMp$^x>xu@*7yd};xkWx%U?i^bSl>cHW-70%u#ed$Ds`~+OqN?Br6MvO8&jl4_ zDE%&q<0?0y@ILdDj;j+JJ_}^E#SlBqf|*gE6=*J;q3%)KAov(L5E^Gh@WxVg@)9?_ z^&ea{J#}$PCvk0w)L=Zx`9|b3O0bVdka>R?2fi6^%LI+yEYgeu*GUa83QJW&ymT8O#$45m=7@(Q(e&ok3CM+$)K1K z479w}tm+wZ`;eQtmH0;B5z5a@Z)19!x!r>dPI3I$UILgF5@gYZB6lVBw~aff939H8 zm6Ne~RNV};q(@o0qJQR>e%wOXi4r81lL1#}#v&?AqVOBIPG{?Y970_m#!m+a7KbLo zb_L3f1_|F8Iv*oYb9!H7LhDetKY-r&#|_Z_KJLcPi1J6AoL_A-mu2gWWcCftIM^@l zt{sm>Dte%AAP?=5RKrK1D~HY$U3~clLV{*DZ9u;oO%Vu|*MDE%Y9OhZig8zND_(6$ z`c%2!baU*4bbAn&W4Ga z(M&iLe=hBnyBoR;|m;k_d-{dD}ES(>%Z142;IZyBqU_0aqOZ$62Y5ElVn{hA7 zjeqg+N1Gw4B!3RGQ2}MxNZkj~B+_6g_g{H5ha;vMDSeUqlR)pqL ze6Tn-)ffoAgZoCh@AL@*HPJz*$Yo6IM3w_rr)giPlE$tDGO0r5r+lhc!qf{n8m9RQ zUsoGN+F2Cs*A7@5ZTf|GDeVsGCO-2=`%&;O2-HJ^N?%t)b}(wJ(lMXLE{oNrzc%;;xpz;9Fvqh7dT{)C%E#`@V7))`h{5ClTN X?2c;tFL?PKHs2@=$ow%mLsFF zJj-fzHQlG)ThT6l&GS32Ly_~zfKaQ(_=1SAtbfDoR?feftuiarLUl!ecuBwX85M@tIYNjH}KKZjXUB&TofRVvkP zIe#Nj1^CVJ>dW?&|C#fD(%Q}P0UUTRP z82*mlDCF@&U0j>JgxFh@Z-u_Zf|sv1+s?w=g5xP_>F6dKe(a7JK_Q1``XWW}$Kx&@ z0ughr^iU|B$&Ej%L^2Op?OO4zPo9sU7=Jhl>t3a~)ce5%C!#)qm+-~%(K#dBIZV(t zeaijutC@-;#2{iaBLl~7YMtT_tK1J{P)u6L(xO6UQy8|q#m87! zb}50d@jV-Jg@0-IrQCSx2N+Ju+>T$MldlBD*?0BJ5J;KN58Ay9reWSG|TTZ~dIKTO~j{ zxL<1lD=;Qq=a)Pc&RYR*3iH}kxQOIjdGz~^)ls~|kB{@NNm;bK!w-e8nO^eI%K9mK z_T?o^%|~H%oh`x|eB-Q-s1hMhnt%O~x<@fKo|&dp#2$nJSP=b$3+C>Vq_jw2l76c~ zqsMK~^phkh-8XIEO8J_eo6xKPb_qvTuIn&XALz6$NLh(3kLhzz7h1#e3T^a^+nfv7 zQr`={c1htWC4P5Zmd?kxWFoPZGW>XRSG9M?9<1{ zwAkwb&9*O@Unu>^7hFTMExD^TJUAfwIeVujdVk zr*i{WQXPIF;A%Y&a9}yvixY2TKZm>5|C(;7)~$xow7DR+N^Su7^1N~@9Hd|sh?RWkuYZqLrgVb~+}VK?fHqb6Bd&RX^Xes|t}FINu2`dno(}hOB(bAV z?}dC6ra_s}p2EO^XbH2}Ci<}w-;AN4he=bdf ztkLy^R`ECgL6^)(<~Kun^m=52{BWFyqblU3j~=@l9L>$E?kGnLwO2Q(EX#C0n+D$9 z%6uO!4uL8R7=N^#rJC?QH{$u`GwF*k0td!ty9v?iDcO4}Q@TmS0yjUBi6jAWQY2PX zRw>7i+D{v$$E6){r|L<0)HgTU%#IbM03(j+cHJO}8CyAnPi#O);iIz;Gx?AS(sj4< zshxO168I){o+*7ofLv}7g1d{GN$k|8`aqQ-Xj0y#!+(bD3H?vd5e?urkdJv*;qhs7 z!Ts6$JMF#2C3BMSF6XzgL1h7EF(#M1wLzNNIMRB}ly<)-i=(-_eVB|d?Cq+LHqAp5 zF?e$5s}%6&fB(;){#4G7bd!4WI7HWhQl`kcNgkCq^#1f#QeU#u)`f#~)^(YBZSlLI)q1DOqjepxaFaU(|gtQu$8YTQjTpTn7zYIEZyB z(PU8?`ID?YHStMjCOm>@JIsM_*DLhRKDkE4?tl77~TyB2wtF#?&eY(Sn7A=uEz473= zjiY|{=D#L)p8e=gzxb&n1JWy)PP09m(tqhuJ?ZqgLdORggU?6w1$39x-@DKde;M_< zm4Ikq6L_I$I$=etM}8|QRD*sOz$6@s8a(Kl#H@7JFk16$>$gbm!~i*EASv_$DG-E! zPA%X~FDxuRY#QW5`*;V=SW=4f?qC1*3CrhYyeiXLKI3B2*FS1gcnX6Tqk=<)`G1L7 z4UZs>Y@Yc)(zy%!sBNARXAhZeoQqAFFuHI9H1Df1g58t{IUvbSYwUP7hZ76w{o*fW z(h(g*^h2xva^=bDNePMu53a0sK#QPv*BUkdy}oXtw6Pgd?Y}n__P}Y-(B=a+0UdSF zt%J2hy3KuW|G<{-n;maud&(Xv*nh4MV{;I7P=NlF#={)(!ZxEgHFhRXnljx^V73RZ zC*)2ofH*`9DwM)x`_FjTp`CvIil^`Kt~mKLoMj2gD6Eb-W)^Q;&Tn2UM5)z8Ne4$2 zm69AwdQ})2WFoLqdZ^;r(WMjR`R4Dcca>T#!tW63Ov%*68K+rt@~+MH2Y5!aOv*;!o1APJhRp_(->}u>2W*KH@NpSQfCV`cRkO19*xo))gkr*bP8A zOwA^CN3~|fB?o!vNA0B*PT?nojaP!@$ytTgvsBiN2A*n&wY3`iiD`hII_h!b2(3KS z`P~f+20I9Q)9cn8Se&u`rjReU)bT?XKaedt<9>hMSfzp%`&Mp!6wcxiG&JNIMTq|Z;Ew>#donpKap!cAl{ zJ>eXmcDEAvq*W(f9hqpLuPFT=`LnUTpIa4!Jvf1`RTCt+00gUI9Rc!}g4z))X>w%X z^jP!ky!zbdEm?WzsgGXCLVIP%vuC;h)6j%N)PVL>DV4B1SCgpi(Y1{$%p;01^AZ)3_BkcY+rlE|2T2cAY* z&9qVQ9axJ=wtu;KI4FsgtfKUl16aIvl6?$t*i0-#x{YQGYAnby6`7Q*28>`v8H0_w zq<86M+f3irH^Cs@eSq0|32JX%{MPyAI}js=8%<&1M}~}#PFOvH1X8K(hUo7bR7-=4 z?BoFWa&w;biaLZoVO19)`T6EE;~z((F}ayfX@mPb`G1LXzcW5sQScZ3)ZC7GuNF*@ zGr$QZDs6*SL?`@cC-b8Z9xcwz7XKy(dmcy}$UQA#{ENTH38Ru3yNn#-BF>g9THte9 zRvND{Ady0T+1iA_tlesXZXkmmvPNAP=vp#yb^#P- zx~13LQ-9X}dCf-`+}(T|LS62Zfy%j$m2>XPwrmhy_nO_NT;~7||9v;kdA6Gey6GjS z!%_SDlMb;Jd&H+pEiOgZfiZgJMo3xVTa_HJ+=`XKkbfUK@0|gf##Zz|)L`hG@FE5H zvvdF*pQQP|ee`hK>Vre!u;dF#3vNSD;gPZeYJW+a!kDxe@ReT%j}NU2Lds|j4MMeM zE!p$GfZKrVqTkbWuYYds2(@x({CEnuHIyF|ND6s;y7yEUI3DCy$j?4u zf@3KDh=MJD#r~uA{8P$*b?nXmQIjhEGe@CMK6pwPYn%fPpv{*M-LWpPYBs%t+s14# zH-EN+PmYn9P5y`NUR5MvJX9xuY04n)e@NSEt0#zdAL!vXt4O$eay>z2P!NP@5J&nJ-{K z1+;7g#!iKIn1X2)3@IBlTRUMfD1CVs>3<~p^!eZ;k`qX9<}e&irfga2D1uH08HG<% zu_(?u{Nj06>L0vk0=8yOcE*)ZLb5;=S1#%%%M;l+Xrsn)u*xx*EXjheNna&bg;oL( zG`?IeYjfMlaV0g^^xi7!$p2SWiG*@Ub6QwI!wGBB zmWhDT7f^=Z{tS5FQe_dlz+`jHW{q3!Vt#8=XP_=zB1aLWxms%cF&3OC0kvv zj>E~BmBu%lM1`6}18sdlhX%ho@1Dd!5{|Q{Khr@RX7dpdvN%o8zSk5qK>347p$ELo6m6sX(a#&hoFN`DJ{8VYOS zdgG6#cJ6wmxCrwL$(1X{OjQYjp|Bi1CoMHT12j*7uiNrG#c)WuIbY7NPEES$r2c4} zIvfQ1{(?Ld8}s|9)2K#4@}?HL0Yu!n5H@U`_h=l-R=yhB>ut%s3y0W;K7f9{AX{#; zTP>rti1akCQd$AY6G`DH>VF|2X{>b#$+70C7D>rRnNd%WIV=;N7=xGWz%7yWpzG)M zEbT9IGL-+$)hqFbx`)*k%;X*{>B>|}Ag~l>3B~-!$*PcAY-ym#6e@VfD)4L8|5llbXV>=mw$8d;G@LAGl8Va z{RGNu_cXu8b8RznOY~a^Xy;x;P@}OW|J{@Nc{|8ijwGa^Sz1tCK(tRV}H4(ge>x~aoG2noo#)D$Fy&0c-?eV@oBtx1k$FR6d$-MFby@H zXB;*X&Dfick#&_gK|Y;JYvgrhd~ulMZp+(@A&zJxVvNq_P}v=xavl3roHDh_Ws0dc z5#D_>`sL`OiS*KB`l(?e`y!92&xwb}>GaH(;Dz@CKD?Z-e1C{5Fd>zve6}{jbjQad!kcN8g{Hjy7=gpItX6%bpEm%kT zhkml$kmFsJ^%A>*qwCsz4`YD#zuYu4&@4W2_%G%$`cZgHuB8xoztefi4ROnQc*&V? zG6Iogi2c^_EHVyLD^-&m^j}hM0TLDZ8WX91%9;K8H-CiTs9M5QV%yZ6VRg2 zB8bUW!t2kBnWjGxRN2>uBh@|iCHJx^ZktqCs@gwi|l7n4**lk{m|aEiK#x)oq!Ym5I zCzy02@#$3aJj@=?_nA{B%=?1-zReaur0`t$vp)=uQr$|PT)F4~;p`psG#H&~m$UsW z#ebfTQy8CX2`eaN8BgeZ*Jmb2AEZ^KpPf?ktLD-TyhG>W%ugS5mTrEz_G-^hWRO&9 z{IaM1G(&2al-=~*4Gf_7mABaQpe|`U0vniMfpwy(UG|719Kyl>t9SXSn2h z=1kH{GuRBqxgZ#>HvBUNma52)1nX4Fd(bfI#Ve20qoB};$)pJzw&tZmSH?RX`+piu zv+Ne6g657~(6*?2^VV*MTp(#PngGW_-BT3|?_6FSgXGTHOVo)`Hi{-Cd$XE5De=7E zGNqM8W1#9;nD}9dXS3(*aB*2@EM*QRS+5%wZ7Dk0edyv-0TK1BY`&C{62`csJ?<-s z0i2A!9r$r%e`+u!~CA!|=&?#k7%ZqmQC0XE{-ZnAMDh0tus@yWB z6J2T;1fMY@CfPnx&QiPDa69LiD5!4qF1qxIZ!({^#{&_9Pb@d$cd6%;WR?c=`ZF## zF!{H}8Z!>C_ZKp^(8p@jjZMdC`vkkSq7$uplSu6mw4)6(e|bOm;HK7+w0{jW3i%q_ zJ%xjZR@rfRZw)xU3J8th1#cFL=j#dlJqL=MXK80PFdjFsZD^Z;Uf=!LK9dgC;k(z^ zTSt;gM@P=AT^`D+gw=RbZQUAusoW^%X1))Il;f#jshs<^gEC*?UdN7_pz&K^ugJ*} zAZ}>67lDqoje?C-NFQ^PM}Gi|TmAJaijeeT`SshteH0^VhxFJhe~Xr_cgmKR=sdIE z3p{qSk{xR$uYv?n(MdA^s!4T`ZH{@E{Pr6{KH9uUv>?h_XWrLYMn9gZt906jjeo-+ z53W)awj;7Ij{YiW*y9^lXo6_VG*z}eZ#i*RT;zgP90vl0?)hcyv44uFPYHS|mE@%w z<3Ge*Ounj$*xD=EmYOR98MaXFlmCTEioO>`x4@IAYBiVS_BBV=lb8)Ux zowt#W-kyqO8+i)UR(eBUU^no(lSgDN{)G!*om!*qQAPe(QH?FK73q-R861m|k4DzK;n`h@8-eogcv58MO^`pj=8w1B*965Fv00s- zT%)k|Nh=6_Yn^z1`0CDD6BP3d<8fMJC^|X$tsN}Ba%+cJmVY_cXfMLE|Fq5tJa%t> z^MCTvXK5qbG`&a{zlOvLVy96g%}83Gd`sGu(*3#QHenJ2oWdTO64|r0^uAnZ%2hx({gzY{(=UBY zwRty0UjS93OMd|sVc1SA&#)f+;Y2Y6s}b$Isuz-3ft<86g5|UK5EY23wb99({hA6V z2R&d|^c5MnD_rTp+4+izojYbHB zVJ@ibY1PV_d%ROT8$>8@9!sA|nyf591oc^6s`du5tjd1X_~JQnIlF~3vQH3sb_Xc+U}N%-rg zlsxsRbZjr!b^c2u)CBQs1hMSU>S z(vrt!38*U82+2b$!8U!zEYY!XpE&yRF|{oU!Y%owTG`ZO*gv zwo>_}V?J$pBFRt5NU=y1brZK)@hfl#?thdZpY6M@X8Dq?FM z(iUUbxO!9Qipn?Y`XlnY9D@)C^UWXVP9wa=D=06Q`ivm{#Ya$fxGIfa&VI>*b19yq z6h?!3I72a_b&UuIzH)rG+s$`O-zu$CNm?;DGyP^y@jc7UXBBg_;=qVdptK;4rhhsK zC)t$Z!frKm^3!*}!30?IRqYOMm!^rS^19QkSKa1xZBI>#@VnNVdEkvs+Ebx{T1#I@ zov`Xar+@u>7|Y;5IyCfIV+M+DBW8IUmrTBI5F&siX-&LQTShJXVXnKutA}t9Y_ktEi?9;+ixnd{{}7?X@&AIgYLX zV5Uo=heV&kEyA;L;>@3zc?8Z%qadExF}sGwDosSmU7bQdAieJm+Xp~k>!1ZS3)X5K8`z0H5vPPWZ^iJM(`ffx4zBV zVNuPJt$`902{C+Y_NQof+kcE{b97A4r-y;uFHP1(E*YpETnJ83Jn|}glJ;(khC>9` zYC`4nqza+`eDj5weCqef#;@7iQ9BG0y3E!pn`!hJds1?}Tu(Mu8a6}%goL~0#G4k& zj}&ZRxV7h1(n%CtN-px0-;h2I;ake~<^3uS*xHxU3MTehcx-jNqkp++0TmIRP9swe z&C=mQRpeA2%ArUn+f1i+;`$|1%2CrF-f#gErIb7B7+!oZiPT`c#}U65v+S9974%Ic zGsNM}sU*fok^yLlhZF(kTSQO!jdmMozl-L(TH|FF9?`WPfE=NN6?m)l-2vLYu@}d& zbISJxjAJtnigd7fw|~ymNh{@Oc|@6W7kQ<+*Low51EuUY7zV5vI%1IiHh^JlHc-kF z>K<-H&^d0QW-ug@O*|zTu+pT$maM_CBgBio`H=_j0IXg-|XD(#e1jpeH*eJ*J(Q>kU;I&3^%Hqso2UWpQ(5SJwB^0vGno67&v7A?_LH=@Eb0Wp6VQr9!~*+zDyofThH*5f8@n z{ci?a{gSV|$gxSJPk+q_rM_l{gTa^1y$Ce~O5fsDEM5gx|7zEZjtKH6$U#9__>a0l z_}>tXe*`P_nSVxtIcJna|C!X2&*EbFwpxRD%2`o%4+F&EqA5!36MnY8Nm2S|X^jrD z$~Zh?v9E#vEqmn5X0PQg6*DwF_sbL|ty8!HjoAckt3M}@JjIw^t0gzZmd=Ot7Nk=0 z*Dk?zAv#QXSdJaYGuTRoeF51pjP3&AU?DC2z8ScGxqqn-a6uU$hhOB$K^3vP7D(-~ zLsNk@(ms3rFTTf@rXv}=;T=~sQ_*I==TOCPP+=>4Cx~xq?dq&vuoO@{dK1j_94=`b zFGfEpYC42g5ikc?b{*Y0CppVa*atS{_#zgxZB#Q4DY&2Du7J%0K5i+*W9s*X{7#oj z22{m!)PGS#AKDf_(=;W+R)aHL3$bJZE=r0Gz0)#;OKJIZ(m4XBNi8bdNw8NTp~th8}wB^9kqnIfu=YNCW-c z#+LFd|CP?Jo5KR%SXOvpf=SdlXAfOYeTn;L8)|YNJ*}y$h%pbrSFO19)Pw09#Cfg&awN2%wHmRvw}z9+!KN=~QDITzGeK}fh{Z7&?jF_B4KO;{QnAo4B9!?a z8-Ir&vUO{BhLzr;4Rl7+Z|C?zakQxNwR53MR{M6ZzfM&^N}wf$`~0y!0>7bkj=1*K zL|mKN`DYkpr59${ibDx9Lm~qS4OtgtC(2Pm4b@KhW=g~M_?kJ^#L)$buU0`8`&Tsp z8udV$Jgt*Oamg_McV3{oS+#G9ctEq;%YV4bqkvg>N)YG1V^tABA~nLMDid?~4`ZWz z3QTMr%Ay5Q0M$2Vn3Vd!Eet9Yu%Ficqidb#=Ky23wCL%ev`3KxFsKVH9+%li4G*A=isxwChnfFIu0_gq>`_3x9@~ z;ZzrD8G*5X7@7k^zBR9oum646;fPyKmda8QX76^Kd4ixkt-M>6tA%zMkY-oVx(%)vPez3{6?0JU-#EE-@1(E)%NH!6dD-*;I(VXNL zJGFgrG%b6S&vlQ!8=RAYHP)RBaDM_2xFoT<@5<8wYepK8dCe5rtCqd*NMl8L*n2Z* z+(V$n!NR> z6u5~9mg+8i^b^`ECyC5VBDBFL1x(Nb73Usu7uG91}1Ol1U_ zlp+S&>g+$Bad%{nWcx|;osf>HZgOILr zN`@B9z<|Cf!iNaXw!$Vk|7mT{yws@sE61?AW=v*`n@-o`c=ePmcJ8$u(gNwjP1GPB zSUA^0)qS4}yC~C37ZO|dI-MXET8i*e4%3-l*@QQigro-lIvzidTV#z(WZA<9CLj2(HGFrm^UzJQ69*Yo|l6EHr z5xa4RWvb-3RR1@g-G5^YC8h%{5O%3<$D~~=3~!W}c@E83Q*@fN4K|gWvKm^n$p<^W zy~oQ!P&y^{HQ+k1ksnX%az!m0&BfU2JT84aTEy37_RLhx*&_g9Ty@u}(lNMaHpMfG zJh{^j@V;c8{OM|v#EC9t1*&8zR4KMzV@jkzg||K!1--m=EPodFMT0FCC4z6p=5QdY z&(+(;q8ILIb=7z&CDPx&D)j0i>n{akYU$vZ%i=I%W^DBw9A2&w*Xp8Oceye%;$`xJ- z4P?R<2lle|((?HdPR2DkYFhx9RBJ^KNkjgDVQb?1p$D5m>j99No3Rn6v~_HwYW!Bn z#sD}DqKs(m+{u+ralCJ3xi(q|k5clspOe-W2ka1NlYdO^tvNA|^k^LF`N297Ka%QF zfOle>ILlH*L?C2Aqw0jR^l&sJFl1fXl>-S0raNp4llniX$BxgfF}BZ*0Kq>PUa&iD8kv53{oI$94w7AOaW2g(SAnmrOcHEGL0*KUxcOd zAPKrnTYpEtPd3}}e5Adct(<;&C ziF3f63n@XPSib61m+4!|?Ti&uT6e8jO~r;Gr$-+7*qEeuH_c-T({j}=1)MCNlS|y4 zxg7$t!CHQX3|}7g9Q&$MSsQqN|m_c2aP8J<{zza|Uo z4u8s>RvH;b&t`0*zCgV@T~14e05Yc)j5^B^JyF`z?Qtqnh0JE+;SLpXjf3GUzO3wR zfe7=hRg%Jjyw&Vx2|+!28?p5^nbbRoqx zxQ9{w^@9`>1|U;ZjU=eRcuC+9z5s!h*nbB1f`?S7;5^Ph>nwymG39 zDDg`sIRL^aP0hWr^WTw0nv0gPVB3;;pED7&DWzvvjXty|SIF6ga{y4oLBax5A{q{= znzZj9rozqUg}Pr9M}e;gsS}B$@Pzc*3IX1TPBK|LU16}i=%84Z$Auyo;YMJ%u73}c zVSa@y*EZ{M$~EAb*fJ&mT+`)g#>h}nd@0>ZxgmG!uB{|=SSQPNa+y+5W8~yx1>&?~ zWIbQ8YjbjVcXrlV)c5M$VvBQ&-aRLzTk{FxH}Sn0hA8@cVDU8Gih&;C~GN{>2sE=BjR0K889Z=J0R*ahGdWaxZ)MQ-1pI zq$J0Sc#B$==aqTu^p_+j%Q8edrO~Ha1G#XG?DbBt0G43fcUU=x%=wu#v~~v-uUBP_ z{0@NqPd0^_EJ?Yx_Y`?7X|_mNx-@`?83i10Io;PFYyBYUFx(&U7dka6rGG@NNyMO| zok4@*vP5~>-eDm{qbXG=AZenKNm48m!59|(E0YZbHS<2yE{Y+#LOCBb($A1EexB>tuh=H07 z#J>k7<#$)3F&D$Rj-tYbKqUBrIpBpy`A!C)Gs1`^R6h1nDs%=-J(i#^X3!Vhv41Vx z6J|&#c~J662DI>rcFIF5DA&dXNzwyChL~#keVx8urLWh_elE1+B&P%J86FL~WtIZw z(22MJ9P0rM#<3)_ynmDyI2sud7BO=(+yksU8%;ZRX7YnB&#HoIl6ywhBaxPMH>4Y( z*v6OW1XasElvVzH>V-MB7M!fnGO6XG3e{;dNOMA^T9RN~k@X5XCEyidZ;_Xe9CKKZ znr)3DzwaIF>lcxt*}XCI&@s`yph#uOQ&xo?IqEFn$BhK(VikZreTa<5AsahOBRxJ zaa?p|>tu-gZaEA5`Y95ri%t+>+oqrzgEJ9qxwQ45@!-d|n|GVu| zyyXXBP{;-nhE3Wpu?X&gr~ur4Igj0**CC`bnT`XDkUp{BYKz&r%jgYK0k_;QKp=o8 z`h4?O4aVpMu;aSSyNhSPAa+b)J)JRk&KmIGi-sB%fErx=xsVi($moB-u4@9dviUe9CV}rFzxQU`z~c` zH?4EfbEAnnh>x9+Hzy!yp$JIyff)ACRS)gZa9#-5q@Cu`&x2y71j9gR3D5p`C6vx$9t)aPF9HGR)2ox`RMHQAw_p&kqIf=m+Sc@4FV}} zL;9}zNXS_V@cl#(ZX=vm+hHMf%bJTT4BdKXYkjZ{?Ex9ErVMG`{4o8|J|%P@gXE;2 zz1Vz_+IEf8Xy;@x!WY5Ta-)5qNlnthI8uUyBtuKkS`+H%L@A`x`GDDSoY4Y%5>Kzv z+kY-oYn4k#mv;rwcF6VQ@V}Y6-EDhPZV1{dX$Q)vzKq-K*Gb<+j7yTi}Cf_4Lnr-N3+9I z`MkLqj}PrOIQxverPcFuZ_-J-KC0wVlvXk1XfCbSEMcz zeBl+`zLJto?!x{cQuHV76u7F8JaXhy*lI8GZ3~Olw03OJ$ispMxn z7<$u}npNC3RX6)4#T-uDQ5$8sIVC^|j$z7;Cal$F-jg@!ouzy(zfsk;kza%wa)OMK zgoLmj1rtdM@dd~#)BI)YQHH_*k^%@7rk^_oSGm5;l`JLwZ|=ISeNl*xBG6Bb;d;WC zh3!tFnCSEihtgKJ~@nKAJMESX1_Fa{@60#lVfvGYALvaRgZfs z-QVdMzpkKhRFGHGWgDm>gy;a&CLa3v=u_0n)pADZq>MBoRanB!Zu-U`4!WDCtdcf4 z-j>`8by_+sz#jRy3cwdXu_VNOIv#(0S$Re~Y>hEOM%F#jF-gHq5X)9WGk<%15*`X3 zv_pZ52kjse6waNE#(@tTcRt^22Nlj2KMGPPq+KX?U18Pye9Z%QHj;Fa##7MJhzey> z1xpACd983>PQ50XkNYUG0}AF~y^*lI%2dp9#Fr(fRJK~z6LP7l8(Eb@&j4dUoWCg( z9#M_&sCX^@9m4o7FuL|TRikqvhLC@?+w!_#t=K|+XFSebFB)TOfDJTYN?MDxo@IlJ zNZ|+37?{K2^5fiOd!!y5WCl-0pcDFv2Wq_IJeV3wYq$_67IaiKYqO9?O)eDJnQ7lT z^x}B+C9{>Bd_Uj(Bwh2J9ILW;eD53IWt0o*(^-^Gq7H3=mzy6S=Up@Rr;vZ&YKFm~ zy8OAU&Q$5$v_a6b+1#KR#){5V=$JACTN5*Nf>uO-(A@=?H6R2dL{C|O5+X}#th~N} z@NlfSoOmWF4lHHaok{Z%0s?F}rG$??C+rLrMbS!WP*KtdQrC_ga+!qBTzV}}Xf(_5 z%si-z)J$F!i7l6XS{k~2-L!v}E^*Qyn?mnVIbojQ1&LRC2NmxR#aqZ6b-iilm+>#C z&)b+%$Z8CdYSmE3ol62eXGP3QAe|o(P%yd7S_bk{Z4`MAHXaliNo90gt{yox6s1cD z(bV?3ytKolcQh*_v+q>cWME#NG4VD%BwQ@}DoopuhqU<-E2uM6cnW{=W}5SNkO=9Zuk0LNDK*Uff-Vm;ETb>c(I*J&2Sg z@=q(qw6*CizueXOaWfO&M-YmhggC7HF7Y7(7!VLG}Blc@%@h7n|sVQr&u9l0q8*w{Oa{i71t&c?wTbR4e1wrA>(< zR4zz6-pSG#J!W!F7pQFMHZe!gkm(b=YFzipCf^HAZ4F9+XJl{vt=JPg8K-u#z_Wm52W@n6f7Dg~(DtfuC_xd-;?`D;epf5%!6CQyg zQeYi>!p0076bphdtd;suu|Xp9vrt9tW1cCkul5xR2`gT+w(EVfqvYWqyw;y@ejrQs z)4mb;na|}oI~jj_Mqjl&No;j9AjHYF)de%BV`?QR^NxP4%<<_JJ1_#ZuA&uAM=ihA zVKC^t0{WVAL+LuF8x&*<1y0?0o-28mEZcm4G`Q?*)g(^vT`#GhPp39pPK>Awn%oe| zjzK`uWLYNejeU2o`uL_7b8$6SmG4?kOA74|s#0lUoOyp}nVT2ORbQxHFem9s^n zqmwQfSwhZ`GUN&_j(Gx&OD*9kK1o(xMmZNCLM0NnHA+Lzo2k1QSSe@&zd^D;1>k_K zdpiMR_Rrn)!fNsMaQFIOMfH$U0s8QbLu5k%M24HRw(eRgtEQN6Bh4phiKm5n;xx)< zTRrw+hY5cl8KH`6WcaaI6rFtt@jMYJ0&%SFl(Mx+!i1V~R+Lt(@rEq{pTq82kL~(< zEryLM1-y*N9_KTVub zUlkyVFom&EX+2u0oSd7T3QXZyh2d*H>ejY%I57Lh{3?O-y*OX1H+`m@Y0N7D;q4?Y ze*J&PN^bZGEVAN=z*l*+qGuTA$ImyvFn*;)J_U1N*%i`!G4vMD=$G~}(u#kU-pdYc z>Bt00Nt^T)JsCIaD$D96$3!qMkg@HXZOoAhEMBBswI(07DH}dVp@o=^${TsEVT7%Oriat*!TwQL z7sM{4taz~^n_ByMCaCSpDez=CFKQ5JNo;GeFmnkgZ!}F{D$HZcJ0v{c(z-}N;*Nh2 zEHj1PhCmHNgTN>Bn-g?7OKX+%&DHs2Xh5oi9L)9DxNdXbw~7Zn-pK%QP=n55lKy%A z&g*8(Ws5aZ2#cna5)j5_(79tNUx<-?F}YJH2Xh(>m2jyzWxTQvbEXsl%=kOlS^HpB z7m>44r>gr!7{YOvpS-F#2UtaDo?U-%gZ_Ll>=8VQJr4S)?p4fQgp_%uIJ^x!0}*p^ zepn=Q%P@lS*Y+Ca=$Z|nz?j9%EwP%kuFG|vZAB$F{82u5H1?=hdKT9TE zCP^;b&ZBZ*`JJBS6@~D$d*w6A)+O2H9d>Fmh1R&uuwxojgc63sowPH*oGpe1=+T7bH%WV`4AK(=!s5KG+1Wwy;mE<_y=SARY zFi9tv!;GtfNdbaTqaC+VlY)=7<_i6B4>0~jO&4Efu1$5c(~XU94HQr5~Z z#Y<$^>J!aARv0f+ix}M_p1`4B-BxON`x;~|ax8q2LW0(lv}Gr}4K?km%u;BVFn^l@ z0nRWvG}Tt*LymuBmpuU4uw{JAY+y*GqyYNN>D(g9%e(ZVTv$X=gg~7o=Ss?zkG0*0 zE#%`s>g}D#93VGc78!RsvnpIDi2rzMbfHA-M z&A&UGI*)$>G`$IRs0-p&^ruJly+E zSaMU9Ju^a|{&Rf&``pY6;3-+H7y>DrPQnar;A?;Im-0gV>dl%LBz(;ZQhg8L<;gs< z(pS@Ql3|IqPObJ;D4~6CVu71zCFLAXb=krla2dz>>PsB%xewcW&qP~-!GDdcvP;hB zgA}Z`8f*d>EjQk(0$b!G(%f#>n{LcUvk;yWIN9?mLC|&|*_9Ld@(lkSBa7F%QR!GV zig17LJlIr5wKH3VnpdXa#3vx(COxrkXiS)7cbjStU4BeRgSw3c&d^oxMsBNi670*6 za^lQt9yCX)p&?@2XAz~=Tbg~hj3Mdol5(s!N! zc)04@;sHEz0%uA0e0YmeLaX#Sc;*^0m<4}t(3*_ji(_1_8`h(7T=}*kC9#Wex(x>i z;vXtyw4*5|W^+pU0Of{kgXT339homi$dGLuS(cxWRL3Uu)IK{sQ+#)kSaAd|7=ey0 z5&UzeT&!k_6%WE{W@`>ej$NP%sbeXf&$*B6MClR;)8JJjlR%x#Sc8D=fQE}gMKgbz z%)brY9i`?{40B6o*Y+URTIo7(5i=2Lm&l#;OGx!{H%{;c@)Ro5LKQ-dDr z>APak>}eI42g6b93hY7q7L0(7kAXOM#|*b_S`U zJU7Vd-}$I>D@l2hrCaGX2&iSCi9&x2QynSZ;ixA~V#etI<(S)1Yie1Ek%&^^_L!&} zyEWDT8{r}zI+_>AP99?Z&tgae*6|=Tc2l^S2i*b8MHPpR+{B1w8+N*x7S z680k(N6b-Dq4R<>gDc+QsW3uEwSP~@N=i1`L5{R^t!m5WaG$qh(C$0IS7?9eRT(h@ zg)roXSPQZft7Sff@XRwZM;ihtw!JYcKm~1p?AbBY;FoRFls?UOj*imX5?#RzLvf$h z1Ipwl3t=zKqK!%>7+af4!&J;&HDR@J{X)E`l*@{p=g>AdSRSPp z#7zIgiIPU_lVzm@`>u^A_t`rlXFh5Fr#nB_M{oMxx&T*hrK$pK?IX+WS9dcsVX7^5 z+^q49y1-#0u9^QW*(Rp195meHe3V-%LfI%IJz>~R&y2F`ZX!9R-_L*H)fh86PG%?t z9h`gL6z;M4bhI=jZNG4=kVkF%F?7oKh0srUhO)}IP3KuYw9^$qsj1@7 zx<%zHE$-`&o?}a%gX&E6YzyBT%)c%?)I2?0aM{L?BZfrZ;*B z`BA0z!mJgBZBySAmP<)mk@i09le zat|^VM!Qg)PWgLQUK5eZzVd1T7p^Ti$mP)DH?6tTtMkqwj66$R8rkEiQKI zsJQ;N0S9eSDi3jqQAf%ha1m$nA5T2hLP!t1(8w0Nbp`aaUI(*+0q%sae|O*76yyz+ ze{7H;KTXMc+MBYpzaF&43x+9qJNnpr8&7a3hed$%sv2q#5?b$NzP~miWf3v6-M1Xc zqLcqf^_G{Ml2m^{7GPo{*FNWcfkEEFi_I*dn_-|uULz2x@urQz`)noc@5u1>PosKv zar=8!P#OhAQ+r4t?0pNPT&(Jf3;H3Zxl!4w05ym4Zk76$r~)!bMor%zpXx?VeNey; zOlY6?);3b_)(y=*VbW+?Q4V#Q|8_ar)UK%V{B?4s`DA~egZr+Ra0ZUdg4a{>J?^D& z5l{_Oy(R9`;OqwzevHyQMNa&`@N7Yl`*I#1(uZ`X<3p>;R`=w{Owa;6I1ce@-rpb} z%vXF36m7cD`7mv6AFjp@zNZv6(KC4;v5z5nUU^uKj5Jj&&U{6OOK<$hfmC+;F$Gyq z0nmd7!X$qpAv8PY!1$tB+N1KXX7}Av!dVv^eL%Ducjmqk~N2u&hczT z8d|pyO9BI;_8TL1cDbizkFuxgrMQ1ey}136b`Z2O5FI~=GWA-mOKK|W zlr|hKgpb6bSohZ}X5<+WcwGX0FFO@Z-|DI{)gjgRRIp%JeFuZfPH`UFBQw=ZL=ceO zqycv_sOY4ClOMHz-#)yPb(<67d2lpmnGP)RY9hmMd)zCueE3a{^+r z(E(tKywp0vYD%?_(iTji`>q?hXq18{CPG%N_D2$=y}^#oH88%$tAug*p}%7E}|%)nxIifaAyY5~QrdST_6N zdS#ztNGIYZ2UjaTUWujPWQMv~@;5J{%bI7}W&$=^EUQ&x2@91@3L3>Lc(u|E(caZ& zT{JCKm)($)1onN6y9qmC>sXvYB6Zr0d;OW~-{mSIDpy~1fDer zx)(AnxrnRk?jT=(;gwe$ij2f)l$=ay_yuem#&}>Zvf51C2zjmNuy0RQT}crUtEE@m z%=8&1Gcwkp;JBuG&o{s9MnM62^7?;x94#*i&#$=|j_Gdi6JbC7EU7^la`L-b$PmkBIjbetBjaE_(?cV1QimLk?E4H@ z-4~proOW6w8f%}I2pV{^2}>}m%&VTH9^5{IEdaU(9?_+I-Mv!P17?3I!_{7r6=_pe zHJ#9>R~8C{gtH4@-ano}s+ND`eVg(A!M`mwD1C5YUUuD>n^0?;BqYex5U&tVoV70%KtwS&C1+1W z`P$mNxY<)oDi^n#W`hBC(&_-hOHU$XcK?%#no4~W1u@p zm1QhDc{A4oH;JyOMk0YxFe}f}N|x4VH9RTJcC{3x%5L_qwb@LRYs6}0m^odzG>Q$0 ztUaKMhfACiO0+%%56K}Xxrk+A`qul6D(D&O?N|&E1)fr_p0>QD3}oSa%xt8bHe_1S zC!1d)owNkmn9D4_pKpJD^hRYax0OW~vYAPRgRbEKz|UoGw@?$F8iC{BjGX|%I~+9| zoC;&|D<9TiVRNpY)1B>l(8v~b;)kYhEEV^0XR;?yv)Vr96}GOV7mrG>`&FaT=O_LZ z5vs0xDTg}lEb9B|a6Z=!Djyv+stx(Aq${h<^e&)9A9hBL1~h-6llMMSgth0%Hc!=Z4)X+Mx^; zdtmb^VkBn~b=7|YvoF-%!Hy|lrVEySZX{^0v|^jAkCD7rw`>jphLCQwTqfFjMJ)Vk z*0#2f6JJ`AGq%&lTZ~RJSE~{LWybQwT3zKTq_9N48ejiT>gMfI5UT8tTE-r@BSJE! zVgO?ks#5J!t{lO#W16nFmo2(rdr!Exl4w zRWP7=D{wqeNmSo&=&Ym0{S(pQ{=4M}D*Q4+bK^WxN+i6DKrp^|nK$N{$-UC-RM0qD z!2C$v<C5T^CGT`_>iQcq0IjJ`M)jc)a`eI#TSIUobS9e+Jer=14ujBiuqwHp>A;yZo(~HCVSO&G zk6h7Mj+`RGo&mwJVj=wuuBYXnhrBK83>LV|PaS4!kr0F#foG=Us-F)Ea53IYAti2~ zRG@!V3RleFYsEA|GI#);x=c`l!O6}=tqZJfAU=9N>jRE8Txwsp!{>JeDIG_e0e@23>>>xm17cHWIbR(fnl5Xw69j2ciL4DAwD8BXr^I zSf)n&xte`l5ogMor{Tk-Dk9vKa2nQbDP|SR@-#cmH#aIsiganIB&ZyKzF}J+U=cDX zUCsbASpsVSKT(|-{pa1>Bez8vg?Hq<-@sy*?vYx&VY@4`x4u%-dPLs>(_zf-*qVRi zuu2kw$cfrjxu1E1tgr%e#bj#vu_Kc<%Gd~5h3UtpP_@>Un<=nllL?Dnj+?ys6@7X@=5S(7fZ zlDHQ~`czc@!6%Ob3BUgqAmPW~3Xt&cUtHmBu4*{nW3a;i9zlh+UXIVumgax5k>9@s zJ{UjmaWG-pT93ZRJFoH_^kNWm#L|{S;c`(>3L#xm3LHiYUWn_6&!y<^^Npb!R{~IB z2cUqs;{zGLXmBhNsuDRU^MsI{6=O*aLd90us=b4xFh{e}i>cg{Q-LZJO3<;W(Q2rn zX&$z0Uqz>lFEXU>#H~A^5p#buE=Qx`VJ@ll!72eVTaLjDB)vA|xp}B|JIj`Cv#tma z_(GW9eK?@o)#1irA?5oxJq)|s@i;`4OZK1J!<{N|<_J?LV&xD+H4Qi)#tBlJ*THg2 zURD-RvG2`|q88W($;NJ9f<2Cu%AcqC$P-Oha7}Zk^GQ3pUDXi5%`G@9|Y4&#fpE#hf8 z`RcX=B%PnXs1EW_)MkI0O`)r6w}IKaNbssI6XZ65C_B!+g-W~Io(6!Fi)me5rp$Nt z7I)I+eRe8SjjB8P79Sq(V)EfVE)7<21mz~7IME~fM z%kAvHIf76^9jvjAP3x%9oP9F^BzBEKfz7L=6So%fBfTDg+pkF9T@<;i93^mb9Ju^`U~`aCPESVF~gVI=BHu{~O|uWm1W zPDLBbv=qqQ)M${yZV>4`7;mH;X*%h{PqMYY$zxGro%2(Q;?e%*u{p^fGt=z9KmWKa z3VCYhfc$@sitxP&Wgdwyw)NJ(vLK%R^B>WXN(=u>2`)JBf6}4DAI`8J3u^RLag>>B z*8W^Ewe;aXNFn#xfBwJw?(V(R)E=plzxVN9{Mq+ElFK~fGJYoCb@MkeZfWLMPrHgg z|F0iy)d+z@*pz71D5=UIFgxb43Nz(|>a4##ngD-(37o0Y`PyuNXW2l%II`TEh^dWw zqLVk6R!|(A+17nz2%PklyU1N;$ScirhpN3XVzE|Y`&B_XZi$s{9OReWP>^PAtk_`t#Bn}7S}x90^E>o`-K z_$lew@vIFhpF2NgRub8_=;7U2@%GDh98I_eKb=#^n?%25TfS6Q1DJ$ie+TJgoH^t1 zOEWB+^-obvBZVpE@BMsw{rgk?g!q3lmw1M=XD^;FlBZ1F-Yii!ydfJ3vZaujVk7~> zoIAQP^?C8|$+x@7y3tezMs$9*>&_G1*oizMH5?EZW{oA>Z9Fyj5T$=Iwl`9^OP7eY z7g?c+e-HG@+-E&1K?|gcS2tVKa_M89Me9unN|0{oe%FA$& zN^!D1=azhmz(~4HI-0*o`}5Z+*%?I_uHAh6p26xaUEcRU{^$e8C8d{2gJs_qJUSs% zfjZY6AUiQBi;|6U?IriF6_Bwm)0WBqUQxO7JN&n1&~0@6i_MzBx6Q{95&Lv{3|dK++iZ%h*G+Cd z+woJ3SAK0MESc4G7p6F^-;vtoQt;!cYP|*x1>pFg;XR4ad+!9a{;YKs>b<9AN0@l5 zCi!syr2SUyM+Ecst>?CZa(Nu~g-5qM)N`_qRKOnHJ?aUo^^DK9MTvh?Gl;A%e@P4N~vkVYO`P49ZVJ5w8b< z{eXru`7L+wsG$;6d9A}5CsLaF41$z!_#HD`}J)ea~o)r&|DZQ1W zUo*+>s@p$j=JxTQfApb`y&p(Avi*=J*jgPX!&=#TX|u7jtmE6DYjaK?13ME<6+ET; zmQq&we4Y??w-u?Di1a}m0mm)>HQ(ufW`wzKLX@L&3(l_W7vrWs@bVjaBV`PnLc-fK zGu6QqXn zpIGWPGys35gZIo5v|ulUJA+!JGZAeL4i(~1GI{12Vo|`{Y&$eYt%Ja>IJ)1ou6Iz( zkfNtu-aK2rSeRfj+(V@W@m&ze{I4k(28>}xWHWJ{C4^mm;%3A1x3%|>p^@OgaqE?1 zFzZLMRkk}t?oLIDBNHm*_=s;7`v^H8t@1@tX)34M;wx~I#9Pf^HeeKEYNUkqV^IkMg9)C3C z6{(z`H6cy_*DqTUHJa(sJqnRu>FLJ1M;vP5v<={W@WnY&MloGn*hf}ccyI%(01be6 z^7wxkN%emv5Nl6MCr5^b%J_gqR5U=CS-GfIW6D_wVCYRP;u?nJJX9;80r=>caK$Wg zRi&^%U=+5hwiZN-8o>huj>~={Zf!&WOz-d z0++9f1|t8PeK%tC`(*QT^#`*gfr(M7-Kc-Bvru{7Qo-+p{~X)v8JLDoO0!TW>{+H^ zn@CbI{QW5GrqiQrIXGwo8i?S2}cgM4)Yf^nlT6gSc`g z=S{W}9J@@VmaTKFbWL%mo5)w2Y4m?-8;UZx1mQd)6ls-~0ObM}wuTyVbEQ(NXvLrE z_TlcR@*m|Hp@(&P;lvzM+7(pvn<^f|7TBQQjcrx6w5I@3t9b!euP~N)Z*dB>VbK1%yT6t?~5u&!DtsK6m=J@tJr_+E`a=p zQWw5kh}Z99Fa8o@d~kW5>^T>VfNu%;DjImt=Ak2EMciI47eN=4hjd}rJ;H~}0lp0^ zZX84yky2>bq=kZDqVkoOLI416M~*~x8{-JP2{C1Fta5?flG-t+iuW}FE~9^4^>`#DB;dKOR|W+B#j zyc1~?tLuC%F`?w8O)JsL#q~jcAxB1dVtLPp*JpDpCNkD|;@!AUX&rAxo=WvgGB#aMY|5(f z=|i-#|2FN0HUfZW)E@ip=1^ssX7XUkY*dyBuF{Z9JuFze&wXzXt)E!xK&!1(7O&U& zBn;6qp1BK2kUf8+wKTim(wGeo9ml5OdtGL5A%sJHRI8yv#-N8_JQv}y`eh?sJvZI; zL|TPP^B+7p}XdYCcqH5kp58Yw{e!&Rf^w z^smMAL6$G4Tp2Zll{1Y9)V@%x@|q ziqKFNQQl79ba6N60zmiAu!LcR{HTR2ikGYrooniQm9zEWQCc-ylRO;02RjXR61^`= zM=1(B6_MM${yjPWxwCgS_mf8=(F(XrTc?rL-i@}t2vW`c@RGpTvIv(ax#F1GW^WB_ zN2uo&J4Sz+<8NHZG$de?O4H(GQ>37B zcyr9DI zRy0De!r;(4Epu$Ov34{HgowI{&dHW`1Xa*BkTZYUS0d05TcFt@!J%$t4>V3Vv~?&n zTod9Fr4g4Ru}2=$B7}ida;R0!g^#s&O|%$FF~hQRsh&bHvREy7tz(F=bQif}5IfA$ zESdBYf3Mj>Abd!Yf~8WpV8+&0K^s<$!5nw(@kk3i@rvu4~BBRbs8zLJMCiWr+d%B|1+M_fady@q33lW82k zr%t+$(~0I?RoPZ|utGKbRd7gWTQyJUtIl!H;XRC3@SN_MrxmkJD6**@e&L&{#X?5D z60ELK#~&bvZ2Zb82-$+Wcb8n%XTKY(81jEXzd(%uWrdWV5)6J9^Kcp&J)ug=Y{&Xhm5olVH8Pk~{K@is#GeMb zR;A@sTKv5W=;AhZls59&Hga4W?S-HSbb4SJN`y8!_-*Nsw)ZMxTE^20?x3HmbBYA% zfdi4Ca3KNttNGYf#g=47w4&mIREEu~%Br5N?WzIDAQY{G$|y2 ztv9l!S1~i}4-V4IKAx^kyWQM&y?6@jio>&=3Kt3<0UA3vubl_m6}T$y2zAEE>JZXH z>U%lLz?SL=t-jYu06nIWkOI5JOv_eE!H-8o5{_5B==$bE*#SCBeIT+S zwcL&Jx~k4y44Gz$A1XG@Kg`__4PK~s^O%Ke|y zOLari*<^DN67C%`i|T(NBfPaHOmVHlmNpoKKHvNj@SHeuaQ)xX3ConJ^zqdZ(b%d@ z3dGkPx6ivLiCcT!QcTKawbRp_iH!Q=o>%_~M$tc6=)%246z*G^U8h`g7BHUdxXZ2Y zS{9F`dKi33`X?!`#!M_MfhsXxiIKQWdWyyfQoU$yEaeog(ibZ~6#(aWvoR0)pl z6)%O#iMY<8C>XbSvBwzA4we~*cXEr41F=!2nPhGPm}kq^*PgEer!4Q*HF_M2ZZX?K zpJqX$fg}MmDD`FH4%3arXu-q@?o>6f;rj2**drMJNg#hp3nJy%C_B3YSP2+GY&k@O zWT47N3sW9{B8LJ?8ylBN*?ZsZXD!ftp<-a0>z=?C!BHe7if$0qhD0|B$44Ic;8#58 zdzS?!L7rGRxboGvFeeyx8Wx$p_PX{a^Q+ijRx`0b)B5e&I=dw;{>c#GZ-P|kg$<6n z`y(MU)XslWiD#vbmP)11H-Fnosoqe2N~yNe{@Z-sj>qoVPtqQ^ZHBPa_gooVyb_vZ z#n>j+X1mUYIdqnm{@16#rnwP+5NnR2Eo~CKYN_XH#*)2*aP1<)arPA+hjRYaZ7OSI z3i_T+vU}-yqS)BLoSYbL+0u9E;nM^6(_7h@Zt#DWr zh-ZJ&-EEUj-Cqd@THPvO5I(jC4CMiM5IwtX1-MTIA7np*9TyMyE(*|FAs^tilWsYl z9q?pCLsNO#Z2PXQp%R{gfjn)d2L|dLZHpCZEY>FM9v2eA;(j>a7*PlimvpX#!m3PM zDZ_Sk92G?-r*~!lmZ5%=qh!+ix=4RpwHtrxwPTar?YBo|2&j&ww@U=D(?jk$MT{BXH;?eM z9_#cmm_x=f%W_6TbOe;kqk@95hfFQ--AmMXx#I#fiX_#{%N&5X+mFXMCbf23$%4x~ z)<=*D<*=g|uvHvu79^~cx25Yka&ODuaxwxE$*j?1Fe-)u!rPNmko#1bg^^TlbGkf8 ztn1i^tIRcWVigWBiE1*oKRz@w6+(aAF1c5@uVsGX#z{OM5;=fWw8bQOUD@@+G74TK zQBzg3Frzk6zq@tGXKRu+;;J7+`9RC=kF97nrd$ z0y*fiUYsWU^n^I6gTX+*_nAsNrCV~!5Z3!nVZRQ|@8}Xi6XwS5;Wk7&J=E~azKKS! zD~I#~yKVvao~Bsl8cKhX;lemnBQ#tn*?MhHkqs>d2`m>gWOSw5QOFs7chNb#>lwhb zP9k@zc&l#KNc**BktxW@=j=o0m^*Q4%RWM`I$l&V=(N2vqqFHGJeDlc+QyYvdBxd2 zgk!fJfBs;NKPUw~^95_P%xZX_6A}}y++{vjx$( zVzt8q?&RHlUsZSMem6I4=*Eu3Hj;WJdnmC!1isoJ&luo1BLLl4f|CGtn-$8vI9?)h z=`AGqI9MkEHO$6x_8qyHIHdZrQ#Cb)k)>iNBiM|g>hA%VYObc^c!i2p#U{1s%~m7P z859~&$x8o9gQ9=Sa zsUz&S`6W{tKHlt@_mXyjr80GL6k9 z-D)Wl*3HdRS~?#94v{-`KlkXO+2L!*eyX_GeQ**gzRQXO)neGV-cB8iXTi+Xlw(uH z2Nub@Y1Z0!Um#to@utIZ?ci zj>&)3q|eBV5^K>4*oy8m{0;6itT1GZ=>-cnLo*Y$;j|Ja1MSDo6d;MSB#>6Jpg&i; z+u^rrgDZn(NHeQV(x{Fz+u(&R!hLl^DgthsFrQJ|Wo=$qM9DUHgLUl>auw91Qu|f9 zFQ_21>PB^TrJ6iwdj*Sp%CW+X=f`bsy|sTQcYSRQG)oY-iquqfYFVdKT%{Mzf#&$z zT5!dFkd+}{WVOC#yuske%y0=*1OUM?_QM;u^C@1Ygzo%0_K78j3a?^;hjw>ywkr=C z{dHa4a(`}x@*CKv3aQ+p@-bir8+mP<7S@dqWjI~6qjg(VNvJVupHGb~|3b-fao~TV z8_N3OwL%9Lrq;eY1&*)sM>vt1i*8#nEv5h9uy z17fd&6qR1kU&Q6?k2F=b1+bH;s$}v*0G8=#Lj2npm1-BNP9Z{bxRd-(xb~b*d5FN@lEVV`Dse@wU zgv={e(VFaAlQN3@8;zk!p(cHqb`j`MZjECnO$g#*(OwsS!x8WSyRWB!3nfJU8fAUD zJugj2-uhEgx;CO9{Ek6X2tg4K!I2>C2IOF{0_AE{!A&D+tZUEhA~=6**k>WP4A0f9 zebinNqWzoFY*d8%=*~QK2j?-Qk8q!a^eYITT=~p$=DeD~;4CUBn)?q^Mj#_5UJ}` z$H|ih&OBYt3J|>eZnS^9W!jj;b>l-09d0aguwsf|TwvOUx6<6e7~L8hfsSg&)Hc7M z%(->k!(Rn#Y(z4|Im}~|C_$PtUfZ4Xg|ARkdz6@7}{_y*0)%O=5&lk9Qi) z^aVGVeYUE>!I6LNp-Imhf$h4VyM3I0V2}AvF)?znWAh0cma#x)G5`4;J#wF@-JtD|ugV<|NL0m)Bi=IeiH@_4;X#ek&FAv8tl z!xE$2VaVdOvfMy#j>-J59?8dSFev^OrO71y$bf%53uSlSfOrw5`5k&<_)MW#WnMC= z5EH>a+aO9$p{7VnF{s>)G`ALOg63X*7;rf5lbyw)PqaMf^HEE&2G5~$Gb@iGP!!n< zl+z^v`nFT;jJPR2EUxNG^e5h@)Yg)9Dw)k*T>C0mG?2AVt!IiG5c-%v<0cNqa)Rsw z1f73ZEvKpVlsC-na^oiUR~7$beFJtS`U2Hxy_BrMZO^r|IzKAs$=W2PKyNd96fHxb z9-WQybEH-!N}@tUX+l()%bFT-CVQ&@CK^$@UjY-YK9 zf@0{l!Cl>x9p{((eyxI0l2phSGDnR)M?Qbfx-Q5)O6%%hUt5=1B7iKR$M$PJ=(%ab zu%cYtuIP$B!-O2s4BvcqV-gRSgmQ&AUcm+&a&z0xqaJC`D}{x{UOZl3n~g}yNdQMc zxW7b)=kB(Hx*>YD=_nxtb&8v2ikon|(#~ZAZ`h5BsM_Z?b@+RQT_W6S>t-jC_OvJ$lj9SxQITco-!;3g1o00 zX<}h>vI&T^!kaO`>Fr|6?ZW`0DTNt|gPUX}VK+#(0^&}=&S1Z_F`B%%zV2Ru_uz8r zo0EI6ChKx92z+sy2ef}M`KRGRZ z3#T!wbGQjGt$Sg_5=u~;XK;M@rAn9!=Q+0Gwi#3I#~l4%4<-fxxpnuFl?bmr{zU?R z<;-}*DE8f2b%R?O^GUDg?RXP3Ql>kdQTbtAEYmq$!%Mi6bJC1f8hQv#WP5`2yEUZT z)(~hm3>i*qU07{*dtgvSrgMxwE_nRFRN=7|SPk`~fdW=;W-rw4gIcs@-ODMup)Gpk z6Z#)!)735cXZXGFi@I0ZZLWjD101h^2^uWb9et+7IeH2!U%Q%xoA8;#D*z_PqY>gKSt>xJBQLiZwQg-4lgAPOXOOdS6t>r$rhwO^? zMqC$_%Uc`Fi{2_5O{%!Z^<e54(e^b|u@~bPHG4L7`}wZHNRk^UD7uhq6GuIs?mP=dzsW*%`;GuQ!zd zEVe9M)MgpuQtm^)jGna@JTkEcmuI2xOt6ONNR*1i@hE^`c6fW!@RyC9o|N477n=}X zawpFzGS<@D77HtC2t9^Yv;k~?B}@y@=8{q*MGgcXme|<}HuompMT#fLo8<#b8}=mx z7U!aB5(S*V;$&=fgPwxJX~w~=$Gq&p0eLC8r1aqR9JD&S09-sGS6YFv>#~Dp>W% zo-*!NS%>F}>4R3`KWbNNa6{(ITJSX|8=1T?6+Z2fxK`@WGPrg{ql;~?69?<3X3*Qp zd6_XE2?_FNTSguMJ{4nsYgA+Ge{=Kq+JKV{$ey$E`Ov-QYH(}q$>m1PfgM^4dbHB7 zM?vlTck~T2+`3pYB@e^yu7BAT3(mgF>Iy9Ri%DX&GcUM0D*boUVoH~kZ4vn;^Fr8~ zHUgSWgDCTx=DVuNs1mS@p{Tg_N^i8aj|7MLGg# z6(wV#Xn3dcPw3!TV{@hFk*OxJD=hPw+v8qgEHTYhBa)R!O5)w7AYl43s5Sv`W7~2P z6;l&!Df7KF08))YgJ2%lvSeg?DZIewVnOf2f4kD8bo9Y=;qm&^?sx&FLFo*tMmN<# z4aWnyo{4ZB-BJmrG<@$S--IRa+{ zinI^~&n7e^&FW;2J#Z=untH@~t*YUQ6mKbdNGUvha^AxZd2iv?g7j6SA;!G61MWdr zG`mS~Cpw4grZk@KzlFy0@wY%AaO2r}F28JXe|YKdQ7X1Cu$6 z_o(B2+TOP=GEF-Qb$R)u7$Gz<5TtMSSI4WXmIR-FNt~UxoB!2bNmTe^cbg({$_I^E zwB7twlYVn(E~&c9S_^h&t&YB{_L(Bj=yfUn;*!nO@H)xOQ_5b#d0zo zh3O@#;wc|GrB{C5oRDy=deOgcKig+nO%z4+XFNwIqh)3zQx2mqc^{hCq+JRq!=eS1 z=lE=YXuHU)L2!+>+D&(26KD{T?2qQe-5sByh#+mOyP_cqM2`FpMb~R98Rba(JVNp!0D8iFj%g7g$Y zKw6q5`vM`)AWL{{NjiceepME4LIx^g&9LKcSK7dm+uwO+$73p44_Py9#XSFDgxACT)4INwTSb z*0q|B{at*!G>l^D?DlQ_|PIiy8ogrby2$e$*SH)5%jDafEocj1zr?L zoH_Lk=TWAEOgev_bZjJF>cr|^eX1FmWa&$>$C=q=_L_yx+TV;F?VM!k?J24LTNdqdyF1EBo?id6^g(l{Lt%Q7n@>j^ zVU9&8n*b{jsbB-(T&Rze;W*P_RVY@ZP_<|#Sza%Hl~Qkr{4mpbW6DMn+t3w%N@=4U zvY}3v&~Xsd`(_aMg2K(iB?7XL<_kOZ}dtW8c*?Bdc z^Vc#knnRVA*P4bc2{6)?Z@!vwaECR7n9WGm(hfk0Lf6x#gOqfYn`M3qI)*q9F^_5P zk6`|aF5!E3zl#UAl~}ON;Tf1Sk=8kB4r2*lZa$}F_4@a{nO9W{DdjBlzSAx)+bELK zK!MCojBJ8TQog%c_X>c2o0M&9C%PlQ^43l90F^^}#W(-qdc*oMd4b-$39C(BrnIK? zl4hWLVM&^2s-|07o2Uf$+X2H`Lpf2Br0?bvAr-+3QROkFuhfb@y*&12G)%q1TB=)* zmpodEQJ8aPF?ruo{XxHUrf?`M#W)D+JdwX@CM{D!h+JqVd50i>A}x0BX?0#4O;c`# zBauF3_O_ck<{u3aqhhtvg2!LZhU3miDsD{!&-z51QEq2w6pBf}mnsXqber9Bgt+0R85jKELkR z_LYD}uRDt3%EWGeHt?vT99}GULqH8rjO_m(b??$6Np_tH{uM{BM8L8jO5NyI7KVga zMFQ$6iG+&OV3ro{779;6g#JkWlDX&m&g+_a zWF<2x4{}jJW%%3d-gD36d*H?j$6u2zto8P0FduiKhMG8kO|Go81=Mg^bLJO$P>d%k zLA1=MpoZDWOPma69uo$PeDC>;YD#LCUe$bc<6EuIsvzv)-@Yk7NR1411a3?(Bgk%! z3p?wz`!PThOJ_D}xV@SvT3fjiH?<=0O<54$gLy}luS`wQBV(BXVMeKoIUdPjcRdwH zIpw9*S9w5x+x9FVcx}s0vhW=c`cJCHqA>fpmdL zXakj-cLJpEye4+XXbIA^4hfs~XoCkC#Tp~2a=a{Xt9&m>pGSv7wJx14UZm}GDRmBE zJPD&-Jp!=8Rt+^B0~q8s50C$h|)sq3i>dJ57T#ey#3XsW;B z^0WQUc2dAlj7^wVgk(z&FU7LZR%O|~-%#q@`8aNToRs3tcTRBV#^au zg7^oiA_g-rNIIBwOe%#vtWq>ASQBegW*I(zX;)RM&r)uE=?fO$qe(krwW+GYnaiXs zna3V17P$wvMqc!e`JR2m7HzJxhy#qP^dl#P<@^Hsc_SYmRYIM zChOHxSf8l1?{D5!ToLQvRVf|8ANt9TpmS>1^x5vq{29{Tfs~s!AVb*R^qDnnmbc!2 z*IT617J);KC*qeBP9`rOq>qH9jbudLfLZOFi{A6=2R!f!{W!05S9kRc`;xt7Mpo0! z*2OTO#=Lt>${^Q-aBp;2eZqAp?}Vn8aJG zN%rg%xgJ)qlPrap%3*+ys%f7Sk+3`i!0F1ux^y!@_Breql9Yo1AU!YB8S@5zq&mw} ztCA#gIOhI$r4P#nMuG%scWPC1&sCnKr=V|RLc)?bOfGKg&UnHOVI-@=cN?~Us-DpS zts3|ANx|mh;e}UIgnciRVNrw5vJfb{=%qn3QLH>&B$c{J4&~d6|N+ei{wv z&|OMhSJV95yIZ3JocN}72LrxkB+?GLw>h&H;T#9$i8D9WxmSBg2HeqAG#UQdg%-El$zi%(i=7zC!#^yMJ`J zRs1p+GSr4AMafHHzeu!y8X8U2%gNOZ4X(J$@=}lJtaxm1M|8VVg|~EyDo63#-%K4- zbht+Z&}*Z+rSh`jw@4oatrc*LSB+a&kWH~9yn#daL_b-9WzzKK%nj$Z8BIo$TiC*& z@JURPR6)O8>oPQYKx>c7eP;qASH8uaFocczht4M#cEe7m!qwt`K7<*R=JjP6NFcZR z0Llbx)nhC`jl6zyxR;xIv7I~%jnZp}DyAVV!W0wpsQ$a1Ctl?$SB+WoPE0x{U=oSsN@>@Mi0VJJQZWkyWdN3MULI zwIfa=$2uFRn5sCqLg@_4Eo%k#`2YlJ13KucY6TRHlKzB$C8P{XNj$RRRr#50l&llB zHG^%eG>PSwe(ox|iIXqe;*o~ja$N;|(;ttmv@_V1_kGaB6JqDYAMKZpF{+hsIU8g5 z@GjZOOJKV48+51fDYMk@E-X=iM>q~cXu<<*kGq40@=@7$rkWC*0fJqmR&hN(tK4e z=0C`BT;9-6$M5D`J#BOwQiCs$YDx#uA6s)vHRTC^{CIWUtfmu#*kNER()NXtR7~q+ z)hP_EA;ZcgrGP{2%fX}XL2k)-&T102B{es>h&_*hA{TcVY+H+ZMc8G+cMVH0lsnnN z<`6CCwznK}28|%H243D;Qa+~UR|lv@XT{VSv?U5agC4*d#b>9^U&41L6v7v^eObMa z)V=^6nfjbyrFA2hXC zYK2E=To(sf@r>c>OF*L>mG(x+a`|P+UAGNcK@lhsFux^>Eq;r4x=rhMpusj4^;g?>dT`>S?~6aehBRSF3+t4 zL#|9t2DL!29qF)cI8=F0#g5+{H8ACRFU>D6pV<(6s3@0NRDwGFI_#IKa^LA9uxW{Z zw@={V_$_+APf2xT$os1I*N4_pO|@TH^wq5Xm)!Bef!f#(xk!4}dF$u_z4A$^MQmY? zbT$cO09x=53o=2rswkAECvCG$`wXR~5fZQcr`0Fws*{_lA7V7Eq%kL;ic>ISAr4sT z6N#F^wKJ&)6>dZbsM?^cTFXnv?eMmLiODj=LolHYMgWghT)$F@Q9XoQ*Nh@;O`PpB z=bRmCoAtFXWF_;4^r+WcJY?Om_MprXl`y4#A*(_zLd6*)ZVf8dKrkO#sH&i?=) zDjIra*cTHub6}PNl`@g3c~W&yF+8h=uROes6}Yl2Q8Bfp3o^WjI@1C`msli!g7#t) zodC?1rclGVHzn^%g>PoShXs$joi16iAD>Y*h;uHIrb<|>Pn_H~cGkjOPbTKlU9up+ z$N)$AWYh^5c_7ofXpa#7r+-bx$CGKN?c*$s#@VTZ=`&{Y6+{_abf8H?bY%z`cml_t zQm)-rEp4(*%u8Q-W7rV=GFHHUfoO^SWkPAq1rN-Ze%P07xj!Auhi{`2svVtMnJ`K> zS4J3U!<&GEm(a+|_34IvE^k$qzXTb453z1}^Vsf}{Bb$c)Rzle`TSzvPr@JWu4+T_ zMQ5-}9l6M1`otWwS@V0w&SLEB7;^l?(~)Ok*#OXNsM!<=7GZN{Ls)Kq&(8!wf^e*^ z$+7@$#Bpd|6DVu;nL$|$C+scsEqtX;H!6q;d^5NoR!=j9DOHr>;j->2d>>q8{rro7 zl~i?Z3y7^|Pc`iDJ({&MXbf^`c(iBiNyDrR1Gt@oF0N!37Lv8qT*3qNE z8ds3)Xrosv48TEbrh$#*%Yh5RTj%an^4NtlGtN~bIMi?f*tg-khR{FQBqGYMvzs(z z`mqa`r1o>wPW!RFw4_~KU7Y`zOkl$x@V+RN@1cC~RY7HcKMeqKFou`y`M)$i{QpR$bCh5G%c*;OQ(gjYZVduX2mEBy%+D_GRd&YMJqE|)ECsZ0(q+wLB~9rac`xbNvT@g z#T80_I#1&{_frV6Np&DwT@E!P<;s?$lK%+CE)*_yNu{B&*?6Y_4vZ*P{hxdKZrpVS z0TTQjp072CI*}5Jq>NdYt7_x8oR&zBSkj<8P@gBNZZ){`tJM$tp0jS;OqYV z#|yCXG))JD>CK^I=2s_>GyP1e{%6I=AcCZS)|;p>n9UY?p#?%l$|Ex{MkV`;Vz(^( ztK3zv{3v-oDq3+0UHXQB4CH~9U0@_8FB3B4shGx0X>=qm~FM5Y%@S4EywELSMLJutuQ)-Dxn5QbYMq9f z0RlY**?2UBYV~xwF4YY)K_DL=-u{b3?5nn=K7^J>#&20RdIPi@sdKDo6RknNZNP%s zs(a-CTjTz2b!ug8%AL_6mcx2qTCyyEm-$ihfksbf$;2D{S)MO0j@F&JE1`mA(D}4* zPC}=KxiK7pvyVa*NX?`aIW^Yxd%dVsS)tyAHIH*W5F-~A2fz1hlWWzE3}ZCqyrmo5 z$GRO>8C~YCor>AL(l&wn2j(e!nra2rQa$5U^F%r~wCh{9??SR8qX+bYNq0|wgYyMD zU&{8MZrB}?+aR@4G`ucad_>=|Mj@=x65;QVoPSe8K_@O(Rl@tyMAdjItZ00SsZ!fU z(=PAchhGPt3Qzid!q-_68{USJgcDR@q^Z+7Q<`ds^yVH|Y@c3W)G-g0XqLcB=a@4$ zWJ)IMAw12MwCJo@7KVVtwc|N|occ;Z2JW4-Q3e1;8PQ4MM8!tGC$7lXKHN*i?PCfm z=PER*NnW!NiaJ8$go#f`2X@~85{ZK_U8;RPhZZX}2X0$#d5?y29jr?*T)g<3#tWR3 zZn}vB{~_$p#p64PyLfk<5=XLP;&Cx1DS>gBh_IB1@@O2WuY^`Xmf-$>WS5A80;o4& zy!yI}Tt|S{IO229qxP^}Sr%UNoJ)j^%|4>LQS3}E%gD;GEF|koJv7i*N{pP~)c)1G z+9R)qo~p00bn{!IZNB~PPBmlvkZ8TE9hDEZJ_9c6_$g&Gt^GtiX1J@mAqLB}xqBL` zjE6&!hN>@!i{AA%IKjP4?_uU2t21xvXX|0Q>j>`b(2CyZl{b%ns+)rjCRqgl)-h5v zP1W~^JXmti^}092+eQvOjfub5pwBLnw=^bS%t}^}6m(;n_e0afj2PX%HNwv&M(!4e zp6HiMcr^ljFtgcDUAEEirNx%d3pr-s{(|;;KTV5{ZyZjf-A~8-H0on;W*fOez6m(z zrYs}c=^$)*YIl=OuIPsTg@ zJ&4?OLNhy{Ln%eNQBqb*qw;iYTE|w|T>1RDY~i*_fZP3*y|=#T9!Q8XLP2bTN(-tT z6Dk`~WwoU5b$`qtNLapbx^2Q6!__9Ukx7CrDwV)x*&J(CerCxd zHU3u6zkyc8FeT*ij+5sRLzwc-mzkXOx!)k+TT;et_5lI0tOS$4iADDdCxA(KT-XM< z-IdeNCYsfMxLF6@5>pyhoA|Ni{)-p(nVnxs(Na<>NRVoxAQP#nlTMsLGp;R{pA>F_ zQ<0EKHo6N0jD|R~Vc5iwS*KCcl4+wE$0Wc?A+&Vh9!Iq=#m^k)gQjS_yDA23nB`Wa zF4?5i5rPcvfz(}IsR}_=m=HSaH4OE%+%PkRsnz~}G)zjjC9cvMxN5IZXB8;)-k$^B zZCIrUlze}$C>PZ+lVs-r{;Oe{r?Z_BB5Bg^jtlwNdVXnsT2i^gV%Nk@NHsvuM89)c z9P+{k$uw`(4m7naWaDz@6ZGnGam*mqGFDB!UXr?nEp68m-A2W7=)8#h{rPpdPv7}8 zOq1?^_756*6 zjGoLlU0Nh8)-AMSApB%!1kD($+OKZYo~QHflk+##`*fR?A*$rXlwtRjoX%#^0*0-wkRz0+>RGB0u46zer} zQx^5Kt2MuG7odn)Ast?i?a@*q{T?~Q%Muh{_p=s+Q+K<}*3pE*_9p$x)sR7m6ylC{ z#TGJX{uFHfJd!!4qr?~I7kDRaOx>SmmtS-zM7j#iBDww@5IMBgsYpYDr-^ql7ljDZdV7OKm=|HfU0jK@SC} z=Ak;Exf})d?sE+ z>^GPLe-We1az77CW3+(%Q>xJ0F1jhHt(su2{;UQcC#wh-x20EsmTtIzZZFYf4ldQg zi-8G&k6<(Cj)*{2zf9rdiFV*Jx+-rjITYSqP2z2Cd#?Z7z1k0==kS*dxrBitBiz-F zW9Ux5{Z3mJHLvKKZeb%LI#*Vo*MpOoX?|XJM8hheAM^76TuA^fR}fFELi?)s{`n>X zHQNsJiV5*WhM476hYp~BrSOvCcMr0+P;n}Ky9#4e=N~E5T_23-TGkNf0`^|o2@eVb z&d@nyv0se+$^v1r&;rM>OUOUrHMhglumSDYnOmVoN)Lzu7hP);5w9Gi{>DHND~qnI zshWKkS6Iq6l_*bY++IpTgXd8w34pe`h;FU_g>Yx z%T2_Rf(+BkmsQqZojwh`Lvb)BVsehed{l*N-q-tZJutnC7 zXP^E^djfqUt}!&`dIj#%hHa8WY)$g~t=xqQh^`r`CGvgFjaOtQ~u z@c(XQt|)^pQ#1onIVrxNRimu#G(k~Q74je6M-I`!{=ff|v|<$lE+X{(+}Df>=Zlty z$+VdixvmB+mWYTKj$~~!R6`7%RvTdKOb$^L;j#XIY#(r$=+t1XBj0R~h6^C@3(C*X zHkpOvAs6bj>~7jwW+Tv`DfibThCHq(J1CTjDkO!&XkZGrbSi^P^PgvMNL5~8dx3DO zQ36uurKEJzX?X||Ez3@2?ihnx$s#}bBPEOc zImjY^U#@i)+{#!^u5J!c z(ARXkY&#qt^Z_}U9^+v1zJ0@&87d}d{HykZF@Fc8k+r*_l-!6kSHXZ&(D+8 z!#kBk^b~&+y)0Q1Wm`m~M+6G0P7Ns(;ma?7N(YxFt845UWh7d~Us4Lw+7Z@Zsi`0` zrjTrU?reC8t<#v0CO^*ES)iBn&@N8nWkUT3E2&?Z!8sQt*5(ePSUVRSVpc32JUGTL zjlD$uy_zJ=8HUzz>KMAl8~|;^;iCfT-5y+(ctyDDR7+?ig_lbDUT!z`x8rI37uWxP z1MF7+2ngg<9U&ECazKq|K$vVayxF2MA&>MawzHg`+Z~mEgY+PAWoj_w3dmAEfA90b z-NEe3NcpBbxoTI)J*byX`N3)(XCAMBek?A?oCJO^I^R<4@ zehS;WDvYT1EY|`iMyaKYe1HMO_&D-4VZ1k6d1i`%7>46}eZD(!OX#{&nQ_S$?j&=Z zeQjY(i%d5%apOeaVdjTztko(ga(jVr+$xj{1MZFgyg-uAwcns!*_~NDsSmeh ztSRYwy~;v6u^`uCURJwmhich$gv;>6XQV?A9dUYzZ$(d_ufGlLS<)OWyUMTUW z#W0Ht!-xDzHy6F)=@B1VV>bXWmt&?gk`^IJ=6kA2pJAj%c1KbaiK5lWq_OkXO?(^bRTdgjNdTghDQxw@nlQ8<^%hL;Xua3h@)c60}f06@El#%|^ zkHi%jjc(!iJ`BmTCUrk5F6SdgC1>US*)?&&el!}7poB4)pKcU?cvBYH&2Ta`E`<~Y zxWFK+-8rE#5)(AA`qBd7m$fboQ_Vr?n9MsoM)1~JyI3b07%s|rIC(3~$OK@|aXc>( zA$hAm61gr7X=F5zwqnYU&y3-y6>xsAMh5fEGW7=q*kzphxbDlv$%&@D71(Hh^({`3z`mr@W+Ih2%jkON!sR9Vt8o`j7TkZ)8jfS)T_wMfvUYhJ zl|5jq)=M!Us7%5xgMvap4Hc4htJ*QaCRHLWITaZMpbzVYs5tliBTsfwqqEgelINR~ zs#LR{^A7L=O&l0Zm5qkO9+@$Y`Iwt@seaYb$zxr~ezyC6`Dk93Dq^J5;<_YUIp{U(L95t2vh57P?YmCZP&)B4@ozR0q0v-(=o=)x~Ww;QI zrG@E*IR}w(WjAJmt83kG=qYTb+!XEyOdHRX&sXT0)B0rVkT`@h=qSS5?c3(TM2x8*1?^J>pi3t9pP^`7b0m@D1M(+(RCisljKnIVf{+0P}>Wz_D095H~>-}QFuz{6I8T0x= z!%JhE9zk;NTE(CJ8gSZ@%1s;=#<}7h8U4;?oy6+8-FGg+*6q8;sursj$6zVnxiS?! zp3Vw?bEzlufg@Wn(o00R={sJnSzJW;c5Y~grSXWoVEv`ohyo$(inD?z&$#3Ou}Ly3 z6Noyd*0{?G{th#nI*v6-~WELY8-{stG&_&Xg#N_S2Mlu2= zY6HjwGSmk8b21l_q|fw*G-lh7DfWWT>KA+ko#6~ zALy)~`V^uU`k%M6nZuS39|aJ}q)uXguonD6APD%@+O=;zfFNvB&R+ldfbpC)72KE< zp_`};C3}Z3Zj%J)Mvgy97`$6K7DVTZt=CXLbO+gYYM_X1Yx$#wGE{r&2UcOL0ycb! ztAoso2&Na#sh>^jAT$kdoSr>7wgwzaHWdZ!GP!k|zITS=*3+D9cpm4T8eX-3<0b~Y zQ#xRpoerZ=f}g^L#OyjDQ+BBzX9*)D$Tu^4P9M?0F6j&rBlVNCMLmbdNN|NOCEYGU z!gQuwSVH2>jces{Q#lupeQE_(Exz)Tg=^~8!vRhf>6usUkwWilHX)X>^ZA;<{ngeV zCiS?X-2ttG?2ptj$*1PdovS5(*>$gn;qAZa-kZSA(CGxbH+8Cxl}pmxE0F<|^cIDe7fgoRe0pmT zlGe8;5+89qWft8Bo=@P7Bq-w1T_Cf;CcqTFdW_#dm|r zZ{-GHPRk;$4&hF?pM>0s7bcqFAhvYj`lQ$yZeGK~_}#HX|J zKK7ZqZ7fN*!#5dW`%&&-U57ULJ*?HP{Vl?Sd`3M=2h>!SR+67weuwrrcF~w|Qm5jW z#4NX*`P<6I43msArzEm}dD)|@uR33tnP_O4Wp5;do(qRl>K+jaHq{axuzBVs(9N?P z)B2@jq>4qVv@u08p1H^%jJX9ERDqX*vH8SabhFD9aySU$AHVCye4=S>ZaN=?{!C)* z5WN=cL!Ta}`0fK(0|a@FCll73gKTgi0c}>(N+Bwgm5mwe?>Mc0lo4^wEJ)2uJsljI zYgkk&6XB@Fr=`h%;D$rqs)UEK+fO3O#L#jpTj-1S($~C*U2;!%>t%~(hYfqFVOwS3 zZ8;sLV^`s@d7o%?0cks$C$Eu%%!rj2?S=1z9ls$dTI6!rg2?`);1BzW!N*} z;K`>$G*V|?46ETI&R6Htb2_wi&Tg(vB)r3vmHD}B`(dT#yTUA}t`-{epWF44OCo%Z z0p`QRO6hWNjODI9$S!XsKT|=mXPeM9u28(Pz!VTgk|0%oTrqTA7yx`=gWqtKX6J|e zgd{$fq?y3al|a3cf;1H3+-_T@eD8&> zlGAcb0KSeI>(<~Y&-tirs^@n$q;a%s|7qa~1DZ*HJEXf@?P9#N%7vs2yRbo+bvg6P zR;_5S4>lzjE*~H=OE_L~v()d%4A5Q{<4Su&L4L~*Fh4fKJ13ZS%%1ISYB;tdII@Qe zfUVecq_@x+PSTXO|4XnEt~6;Uw#`Z_^o#UUKH{cJ-X+Z-qPHIVyMAatt!{W36YrGD zv48G=6A&b3BL@7;%xbz$8?*k$T3~ui7!jYUH7-7x`GZdqku(cQ>)I{nHsE@b)zP$E zVO|TR=MOc&F!+Q3eY7$0s#!G&h^xj|sg^K9-$q@X8Pqahr=^iYLWS>5cUR@0BU)5g zuY~cw&^kRzn|Cx(xainR8tk%h+FyKQMf(PS8o`7&cH?0M9=m4uHNXyrY!{-#Y@n%h z|EsCPAstSKNN%;aC^(P3T8iWyvs)R-=;$X%L0|lll7jv-IssoN_&g!%rgvh6y5 znmL=#Q@8Tk_}qjV z6!3hy>3o6SZ@8usLnf9YShi zO`r{ERVb+EJY&{b77l);NXqS&_7F*uvy~PTkrEKSQ)(p5 zG2lRjRqg3*R#Vm56SRUh-i-adn&fZJZ-W4LzJqswWZ#K?s$Cp-!G(nO`*fAca-Gs4 ze%V$k%9o*|B0!+a(i^}VX}T*1?A)m)*DUy6w{1##{C3H}QGo--g@sHeuFH5(g)*LK zJ&fD-QSfo=hjZnmY9H67?>+^8$>|cAN%y#MZ@YRdsN@UZ?HOpRv;ak#7{K-;(&G&> zJ8*a(IPUI_q3X?DF%<; zC+b(SQ9IM5Oq=qvF(|!jY>=Nj`HA|2eq1y`2k`E5osGUsIDr11{#swdgn1vtP;f~CnI@xKo`1qG& zm(Ger6sao1ms(TycLYRwtVkPOE1tN(+8Q#&i(T(Nz#m#5bl#Ms%6RN9CHbyJ7?%HY9TGrB!#BG?gLk!sVps)GNxSw5cptavv)$J+$(3ROwL*f$C{Nt4gK_nQPjEU@m(OkC z0QrhrnWGMnn?A(W0(|z?&dN#5EV<@hS#Mzrxgn=Z@Ok^svYq>*p0%DORnMJ&;yTj=f@MjLqW*dvAfXUwY_tK@3 z5Oe3vp_9$ix^ypBf zXT-l;ClUp$t`j^2%BL=jUoV3-9g^w#i?v?>`pR%A__5An-vFf?P4O;yg$4UPvWBZl zy5)p_(Q}EF_&kw+Eh}oGZS3X?o(e@^=;MU{O59z$hTE%F9mP*wIFm(iqTG{LF(Ldi zA6?u>Nl~j7@kRTXkd=Pv;8QJDRg+wGCYAwHzHX&bNA@a2;o*c@%bIres9X~i)oS9r z#P$I$yZFUOp3j~s($CL{C$pWEfU~TL7WD^zfE(e&84{B4n(;j2jk;Z&PAgo?N1E6+9`{V&5X9wZA5gV<&`uJ97+m_gDKqo2EVuL*q#l z)}>WRl$AYG^|+Fj0$kVfGU=AQppg&jB!xWb;7ob`On6E_%js{tD@=y1 zduo|5n=!UUlyG{%#LJ~Q*Lz`!ME&!N5)NRvF%!L25jNTJ}@toPy zG|QNiL;{!hIvjiSBXiE4x~3+Z%kHp>Y`0bd(pDZKIF&p_SLxBtDku=+wDZ~821`0P z(vd`SA0q@9V@Vf^og3}sZKEs~RHG^X((o`lVEpjo&-W!UZy{z#+Fr#yO&YHe6Py`c z{{K~VFcB^&WdhhC3WMGpGhh{e2!7Ta%?006o_vhhWSIdKAeQ9r5ThqX2ek(f9*b#O z*kS}1&z2(7B^ztjP+hXztj&aupzQtfS3Ri`Ha8L=;Ch!K=3d=dsY2T4Rh=CDj%AzU zS7k-4iUR^6+1;RWiyj_=4}aYgGSTcj$Bm`Qc_n?oE*zD1_oVr9@+vcb?rFF>b&k;V z;h713qk9gknzGBA-A~HL97_Gw?7n{J$J0Ny&F-f|FTI(sd+Eu_NBr%n?ELbUU$yvB z&I)(Yh_Sb=q^&ER%5ENzx)Tsx@Z73dzhmi~j&WO7r@`^@ev<0>qoR?|<;YD-VTC8N zdg&^cu%@zGgOdG- zljZ~jq% zQ+b-#l{6hqUZ_5^P>3VWOhau}do(gMzxC&KAEw43fCv)Kyhce^Ryew7kg9O!(V>n9 zZWn*qI4*nJvhpwO#kW@CIsJjb`7Ij(1GUqGEJLVtnp?R@%rD-F^I6=Y*Fto1T1n2v zMAtFyQ8lB`FL>^M_K}MiVW!g5r7H0pT)X7a@T5nc1Se8B-6z2r#FzV+RlU3Vs^z&* zahuj>VK>V4bIDAkVLyUM;3(l^W4v=UJLJYEg&z zd0!6ZO)1F9?0XKkHQe7S!rD=FftlZDm%LjWugl*48^$hwMvY#^gul8>)NXe-{p~XC zt25N-)Tx`w29L|`dm64b+ZeLnpETm@J|@@jvt+AjUxMH|4=tOsqiR5h*8%laP09ZW zd&)zy%FM=D?lP(QY;Bm?os(ktnm=!eu(js5MwCXv#21Qlls-%7n?@d~#KEVw#A5gOcIejP54T;S9B0*4IeeB&Cz`u%N~LuwM~D6e4_e? zZpV?(o!H1Zf0k!BW@?osb_jr5C`fPUb#Q465iA^9g&@5jiRVDeT++e40cavNy;?Ck zgq5c!VyU7fFGFN^cdQAj%Xf+r-1=ZafU9<4snLK>xP_ z9Yi^mZFSU(FB*ulai_4yOr#YcYC<|_AIfGHtefnhe<{9hqAb}FWaH)uXmZs_zXFwX zZw8Izx+Rc^T)8B@p9<(s=e{*!Tle;#4Wp-`0`3yZKUzSX*Mcr1J7qCrk^!swi~1yT z0Uc9%P@@lZ4C~5>QKrMt{T2jb8Q9Sx9oe$LmGEBrACeA{K&O6 z1rZ<*D7JC&^i z(lP=;MDPiAhkJB;Br%LA;C)cJq-fCCNp-<|e^Wbxx>ho7AwK6`0myeXFr&ko zGR?79<8fh#IaR}>Jo3%Qc0Swt(hQD&Kb|D*H#wNdnK_*6@5;iJRiUw6oz|CWq$zEP ze|5yct9QwS4qcH$b7T`+c2vInxUx>#>J%V!fY9A~LRCAHqAj72V@7*Jxk)ds9G7wo z%l{rKh5NPtQH^4Z17r8oks`F?>>_;CAsa`m^JxHfPky!cZ{Nr`tXxd73_(=8n`8i1 z4_YnxaEZa;?RSrn=wzr{Bs+N<8j0I(f3hEzlo!5RD$M6vpen1KDCj{2Ps|IWP5umX zh|tqXeXk;g5rGwF0V6(S-0hY79pR2_E0Z#l$b}ASNgW;N%zVv*5YewHH_Nw`E!;!Z zv2Z(4J%lgFTUL}ILs!FFx3{CkHBp_E+UmYn!o;dXTBmQ%leV4V4xyT0Qp=)Cg`vV))zMp@KI!MB!xDTr0|?z+ z>01jkNKh0>Par&zVIv9Z0p=%}j-iT$Js6nbA3bSh1 zL02hthBu9ygxVBSQd48h04)OWRGD~Pnvkw4hb=+LhZts&%0awEllX5>R~E=VuYa6< z8InYaNWkUBHs0bkbtPgq2KU@YAeVP=maDGrMy zJsKHF=vX@!t1o>_<3SPi_A1d;-SWMmSx%?f!igB!D5VZ>zmsrM;?<)Q8EzzySF!PP ze#3Z=qkwe8f9sd;rZWk)y4yLeKAXqxue?xpIS8XvDts)6EO#Jg3g$74mUZ};U5 zHSV~uwl=9!4Qfpl5Opg(|G>zuT3Ao1bFF%>wYV(gc@z~w8YkrlTyuz=m1b_Sf3fLi`Vr3v$&LYn+{#%!t9)1SRZf9vUo|KVCs{|)VexBv5~oGMfn zLVfM;j_VHSOM>srin**y7#jKtRaJ*!R(jwS$C@C%Taymetcn<*sjgm;KEc!$ql!9| z1!1fQOzNE)TpmcoxAF)i7Ua)AFQ?7vh`$*FSN?2cXX9@GVj6;g+@Zx3C4nR())6nvN5MyQOM%tK5UHOa1*!aF>z8hXg7 zdl+Y#x@~=;OTR4?8C`_wEaS{_P}a~u@m)B6;GKQ)I%lmC;|EWa5w=#AY6b^y=?EY1 zNdXJh6xVHZo&@0m&*ElX@(seB>GSm)f36oT-!N-PlmBq(ZFAtg_{OQrba+AqKv^-0 z|8n6YvJ@}=k`&l4sKyO|I8l!1;SArK{fYT`O8S)=PgOvvY0idvlvN;yXo#f@W&wqC zvavq;y4B!usPXRLJ9BDXMg0T6u>Mid*X_(??a=*!#QVsJbT0MIyhz0s;v!Ale;Tx` zSC9Qh5yRVP{rK2lLP@#@M4sK~T@x4yypt43u$xXd0)C&lYWCCH@6H_azx|Eo0DGwN zR$ioWeO=r&VN`w4%GVz|BLXI0>8A1n4>}i~V8yIL$=1+`a0h6=?-f0btQdP`FyE1+?Yhe4R?-8K%hr69OKdkSYesCT|& zPe5$rSR>U!!Ln13Z%vLsY$mc(WRxZ`}Q!|VjgvNVrsamTx$+A zY)l}KbRjQpT=JD5)`$lCe^iboCNMY!sdd4JR)U|pyh-xDbhEKUQoWVV{H8jM%}j~N zW0{bYyN`ig@4RSC-U2S-5+zOI9w|g2WbzK($|_b9ykrBU8cYE$TA;mR`QgioNR(;n zSwMF+b3Rn9sD`Jr;;EyZ&mIY~IT_S)nrK*;>unTKd2*e=TKK{)e>OWMfdZ1E zNV8FuUQ7~GNxres*K`$e-SdIjCcriV*XOG!RH9RJk=3~Y=P}fQ&|;E@V!|eR?ype4 zb@Id_>xY|}S#F^$22F7lp~V6he;pC>b7mcc_i0`;CHD4ljXdA_XJ3l&EW zy>HeoB89AfLn@!9m`Np5+n51D;*j9hwOrG!Q6p#rUyF^xe@@VsgU*$nINYSf1{#vW zpz;&03=4C(^Q!;OfR|Lym}jdvTc=wIrH9CyeA#C;82zb%TPTM-)v>E4devExqqmgL zKw`<^o0whkv<%I_-V!2GIZ)nyXCniAGz+7#PjgbZ?iprV`a8bE_{%Eag&eenOKCyd zMAad5G$|9>f9b0(a)z@ogjbc(ksvfLtxl--4*#gzr(I&dC~CkgE+2b7p0E+8g)iU? z;j5~C(nzYvzk2<-ttRF%I?Qs9?t^)_C>NTr}uO2E3ZMhp9>l#>_gnHe4y|o?3eYq#ne{%VD`o=vfU^1-A2p%NTy!pB-)0a%TCs>$$34>V&ryze}F z=}AC!f8FZw&QnU}mlR{4e4FpRa=SmNW+p0N{e$LHzG0<6obt5CPjMrX@A+{qm+HE?%P5?u{=+2p-}8MrnUgR3e`WU%-RmDHp-3a3hD)mKZD9fGW0sv(m+y+PkAEQ)JLabSSe-HBtKg&KUG8 ze=mElNv~Wmf1y&EC&!Ul>tdZ?f1k{!CfEtDckIVfs}4^QrQW`grD@i2o_sH+Go?Z( zV_)Htl7$VDy6?_`1T(dtK;2_vwPH|tDTH)D=4v;SEyB9-;p}3(#bDsxnNu{}dl6#Z zg%$)wUwRW|lehdv^1yBmk^1sYq3dQoe{Z?w)0Nd#CU8+EDvGred8T8xkxgZKegFF5 zq^;u?;OrwxHK6=2QONgm4%@Ub&`nJBXQV9cy=nt**>WSle? zTLWTiWfxlDd;h4f33XWHxUSYdtvPKKNg-+eUsblH>Yx%OU_X_Z4z+1f$sxfOe~zz@ zI%OrQRQP`-1Yot4GyJACu0^PSS>RI4UsmW{HL+1j2ykJZps-gkv&x%|%cpjAVbojFTf zhl8GEmqxKtR#)rOH~}(YlN+kAe>qI0pr=$dsvFhYG?7fbe=by`du~>36A3ye6$?;o zj_lMp-@?kEgHYu7!uj6%!|?0XyAnna)7d0?ytnhxq889RB;Qsf$brT98=-z~j8)WUt*iVvl#d>SF>{zAXUP?jNf(U(o&mP$*k!f0AaN2ej4U zaJrF{NQE7KK4o$SVG_9^Tx&Fkyal6O>)X|bB8~NRg11&sJ~|M1 z?Ct-Tw-tvPfAp+oghfE~)2t{t z`>TkmN)=x@4S;DSXBGQd;{rDx9Bd|l>VCJieYe%KetENOU>)yFSn_o6ski4|H324x zhs6BY)8ss<8X3M$%bZ9#9z1z)Lw!m9N6&n1foAHmK)^Q+j4>E;e;t%;-gnL6PTf0X z5?8i57jtEl43^pM7P1JO>83s#@E0uX)dMk7rUYbvMAAmk(gA2PIod0o)C7Tu4U&u| zRT05w4S8N_P@f;0L@)#iUu-|*(m88np3tEk_)hPrQuU~BRLk?O3M~vx97?JIPeGqm ziSuK*V7gx5{^f{5e`_~SmV}34?#tcnBxi-rF6V%V)Z66}(!&raw~!Jgw&OCArOC`b zXm%ThWNy@$1d&V*EDfL{Hc(ChdBqCG@+8=0!&y!HuHBfncj*Y0RQ~}`8dofz4Ek=8 zQ|j-IOt!rnPtqVs%1G)+dwmhY{iWLQu64SSY_jlOc5U&ne``>;gOZ(7FEt85aJblV z#fA~geQRS-&0$ehT3Eg>i$pg84tIsdQTsg6&D78d$VDVY&hgd_FJywgrX43glyzd9 z7`B=T8P)BwuCSl;*08b7+ju$_S+oLd<-2gav^Tsg=f~S*`l%0Q!TVMbFwQYpBF(t&xG0u$TaZmNx9jb~9htD3>VotHU%WB^M0o*WX!Uc5TbP@-$lGR0GBHN+~7gAJ&-)i1oDN z+bRXHf5VLR^q_=tVuY*}ab3L6#Z^BlO2FgAN+ltbf3)( z$xgHn!vE%Ghvbsv+xn(fI2FZkoE4Y;43Zbh!xW2whl!H{vRU*nfo$Zy z=TYsvq_i1;fMN6Ewp`_ME$&nf`6tW%fA5cyc9$#jvxSW2at4(Uof!Cv2gSkNMk7sC zcuqJZMfGdwVys{aU;t;8XWWPp_Gx*LW%9qvu;P5b`&tawlzwAI?FTxgs68_UW}(}> zpOy!lGjArTJ=F`h?Hz?AN~Fdwlx4^*qZ`_dl$2aRJyLE>Y<`HUyu1`eoctxnf8dh9 z`Zu$$3o)SJ)+Da2WarZPva-X8idiw%)GXcP*amOgf zyFu8>k%9fJxr*DGtdK%F8xGCP#2q=I!D=LCu6*P~vzxC&T93V1pG*?YTP^z2?JW_V zhR6kpkX47STBjg}gG`hRdUoCRukdyR%f^|8N^zh-m5v8?w}W`5gm8`fe~~)697M42FZr~AbHq%@&{cwBM~tai;;s~D!KG1ZnL z9T`=PGb>^nD|NF&P|$~+SIxTS-muETgo_!SymjsQH9JkI36dEx&$StTX%Mc)eNd21 zCN((mhGGqYGx9x3f4h;_(8a0JnOdJPW-#YF2_q*7G~X&VUy^0$Wu;cj9Da(KMB|I` zU=SGZVURR9%!GlC__;YYCx=FHhyl9d>^;-rXRl z_o(!1Y zxjkwIp>pbgkD^LBG0=#BsdH?_vFHWwY$*078?MPtYz4hFXFigoYW=~ci~NdN4R*c+ zAwZ=p7Xu4KcW(K)`|~C>j+^I6SlO<}hnyF0GxxIMuBqaopaG?@XsZPaV?4bsIehLD z99Ag-V|>~|f3_6b;Zj)#{|{jhwu2_prNlTyap3vYAuG$(Mm-l~BvdSY=#$(c+*I?Z zg^jIj-INhdfn!8E30UC?|-{qAxn=9^$y zYg&kD^ydRwb>-R!6m)UGX3YWl>;bmoD-4WMWUP?|e;jt_Eh3vL5a@Yz4ec*&uzI#3 zM3Qc-Qfv$J`Q+QSwG|>9_Ch(~e&1_s_;4Yqe&5TGRA^?NJmQFny#QXysmjK2xOEvZ z1@BVKXta%>W~wJc21L74w0Etn{#^3~yiVO4B2Ul+3IpzpyE7I-D!yXjBw$|+?6iUN zvG$g;e-Jr}`g@cFV>g)A&Xs2~`Se0NoB5gw{Nl3qM=8%iCvscfp{93wg@(vTOFh1jF@{a-S*edm3e6U#_UUcVgXy5<*0z**rf~Vcq_z z+hk6|qj0TLjj$w&-WmhZ^uz=luxB2zHh!@nf7S}i*UA%ap?wE#YMm?`R&|ng)K_|L zx&)OQ?sysOG|e;OFu(31`&&pqCeRlNxV>f|xx!{{zExgQ85Sx}ZbS~HC}Fcg`j>aD z7Lzk&U!-kK)!sdo-FV5ePuxn5b;TMliA+aNaG*`MZ9U!7mpoi@j$Gq(k0+*P8c7^M zf0o-N4If?iJSw}z-1E@)vW7-SCV4lqY=felZql#c)5eQAZzNj@??VAmf)*&T-rF_a zs$eOCT6OV}U~gs8^kk99L8hz#_a>@sf65U$l-+B-FB1Ptl66+xP_5to*@sTCy7v?% zjkQEH5T}IEzIwIG8&o+{>uB%Eeyx$h`&m6vrocj5vJPq4KbpDopJVR)b^l5j=%-U68N&%9iOcDSV4eCcfP9&hYbD{enG=oc}g zSuUVEKZnH5PsNW#gULFPNJ)e2e+{{#?t0D$!u0C0j*|SKx_|hd#ccdZYXH_OB2hoe zy^(g+^6G`0)uFsoi{5DPHEJd>w=?g9L$S4ai~4vupM-^oVkbR=8w$_3y~SHJh}L+D zQh3$~hqWR^ZF5HBoU7hpNS32$kzv4LqJhaPYUO8`tqSu47on~4!Ev73f0LCHWEFX} zBf&_bl_MR(O8FT=_ES(_s*jT1Y~7Z{wbroF+S#g!YIV38@QdrVec&m3i0o+ZwkQHV zty&Qud1n3R_ncXO{(CvIo|gOm!gt2*uS&WElBg*(+UUTN$^gB7qp|Y32&uOExcc`! z#VogI^5jeNlOeV35ll^!f4HCtB4xlT^)iyv0IPRS7qeBT9aMKRB(s3jSrr+2`zD&6 zKs1n@q-w?b)J+dJdHP~mmxv@IAYJ4^`C!d5hXqI6$Jxm0V0^ryiV6N;k|u1rkavRS zavg>$>dB+T#!8-snS${fWEy#*EgoZNd0OkTbc5CuqqBC*{8t5le{IpRj>EMmpQVxo zr<=ELOv2!}$j?;e*u%Y?yQeX=t*L{qd9z5|NbB;t=i`@x@vRJNB?mrR38C5$7(7l^ z>D3*#G@m}4pe-N_%H7XLQiSv>>6MI)Tsxve>t51|Drcwa|F6v%SEWtN@dhixzik&j zQTqjih0hdu$u&{lf8v|dqWpR-8N|_SnM{g07ev~a$OTU%W0sFbm5b(9St2@3qNi@k zHm@#`5dLBh+NlBCh|1wfd;L7g{WoN|(2J(reaBr!pfDyD`c_by(z5SXT6*62eu*r0 zJQ;=D;1sy(E-~Dp`yo8ga-rwocP0&ker%7YM=BV6j#}E_e=!mA_pSJffjf^=;v-^l z`@00=Csalliei~tKq|k~cpSR5XFI1sHEq@*${-T6GN>#4L|y+ae{CCh_uXqQY)~Nn zZ7_6&_8kZZ@_3(CKNY_Y$~&5r8_hj%A3pZ0qYcXR~-+(3MpYYloEG z+MKVwdnTjbe|DA&S1y*g8A(5T&fT6B5el8Hvi6c??MaeyB>(-$mfT85LZ`X;U93{F zTi8_xa-wPZ3}WiaO;nFED@M?K=*|vJPTx&6Um_DQK2m%KRbhM}R_9dPkH-SB?ZmEB z;!#*fPgMC#@*0xK!dmvZ^_Qyk(3r`=IJWn@zmyL>e>XKCC+-^YdX~G4?b*vKUbh!- zfBgb%p`l$79?Q>P)G_A};aQHGsrhKptlvWn7}4x26@Ur$4PEuqOo#*{kWMF{vT_Hh zTM!18UER7A@RazE;o2!XNW%#v$gav<`8nzv$zb8lDM>Ltb-7nf@*!^w4 zKS?e5e7V}T4;m(X=3iYkoRK%yOvt1K(5N^< z#DIFja*qUB$}d;=0Jg`IT(2V0e3LY`Spl&SNbmzEBMHm*aA@PT(+F$pm}o{&t^iaJ z?!`$bvzT3^S#>(E)DI&)c)H=Z(D3F7H=zCIe*{l0hhYOh|`C+{jfsTE_HqAosdTLWn87~7}>McH?@ z1?7G~f{!|DS%#h0`<-jBdF}Qj&wLnK=3Dcrhq;v-ezD~3n)UGOxZu7;Z)1}cKDSKi z#wK>(k->tW?QI-+N=zSyr=dIhQo5NEf9%JI_WeGNa;3J4Ud~xk@nC2hPll7J=Sw!w zLHW4P_HOkjd_3SaNLEeT0`walCI8ej+ynEp61ubHl~m2IEc0&Xhx^yBC`YYzP<{t* zF@4Y5kcX3`2szPhqZe?mNE z^9Dyatng18WV{c>G9C)N5j0TFI`J)0EV_GMlVsdj$h;UO1|(e@t~16BZKDm9P1{bo zg~A;?n!zL#;Av%ctn6(A84MAuELmd|W zyR1tXCRI#Z5TNGRRh~jj@<^!ree;rA5Qpe z{M2b8msx|+W5U&T!lmbCy=sSm#xy=%FnB`3*HaI-Ta2JC7}rXZf5w`MlOnHs!jW}U zzjhh9>B?O~6(oh*)YAtX&2+}CRILlz-69ojdD`PiffOtK^J+S$Dp#H&srFn+8=z0| zrKCQJp;pAA@_>o9$o^jYlh_yG_3q1IC`Lqba8KHi!z>6uCjr%&Udu6TI^7KNsg;e6 zQZuuio~4Cv-<)Wte*%eQ2w8FGjYfO4%=sw#%4~VROJ2yma55fF6Im zeCgNsx|~!t7K`Z@rSvVA;mdY9oFJP0#XS&E?O3v_^2s0De*+!m4nrdY@d)i=Iru-k z_4yat`Xm=C@RfO?VDzN1Tl+8CG}}?o>6=qH?}F%L_fyEjCduu)EZt3H*N-qJo;9Pu z1o05#LW&Xfl)dW=lYm+9xL3dnGKksxh~^tEV+mljWZEH^v-V6M8V$K4ra~@BM*NBKlys@#N}7_@oy&C$ znx1ruo;g!lF>k6VdGoOzAitM1!?K~%LrYvW0d{xpu1Li>t>hvbnd~pZh|;qJlDjum z3&VQ~Ji^sMtKzS8d1T59BJ*?2;}nI}J$dvX($BJ!f4^0idQ<88`Dio?X?@=rXd#T& zs*{ew1+yGG>YdihDTaO=pDdc~Sdk=m$Ey4+N3jNqlq7$Yto^WPf_`9Eh09tL^JvqODwMMH{wM z-!ac(j0Qo6l%F7y*W*onM&`9%0Nhx^$pnp2bV6@O^1;rP0Kz>9pfL%G zN478(H5U*^-1leOx%f60ZN;~qYIbaJD?!NBcDm}{H99G1%#z#Me%sWP6zuTyAvMwp zOy+EuH6&`iGmH1C2F$Ku?i^jY_2=TU83qx;e`cfcG|ubd00$s@VY1w`*ja9f8PLIJ zWxMMxAOU{Ti5ZVC)=Efu8@nbFK||MK67?h#Q4M6vP|a}sN4n4RbjcB zGzshKLee>@Hb2eyb}iT@PaGtC{X8k^94s&g_NLO0N5j%UzL^5L@kvMNnWZpvWa9R=mIGSH2n-=>_2%wrbnPtxwTDHKO+*nb&@N_e^ zyCUsd35i?xsVvN?$)pLgu+gn!kl9;#js3H|S>hj*T2QOoY=vCED^FPhUq#zn5kZ2w z8cwhAHRGl1jR*{Va%ORO%X>PRovv&CfAL{uI^vIKCV7zPVIJ`Oi?ajy*LNjwKe{DKk z2kVV^gIik*t%zgHP%)&$38_#NZN}lNRyla)GP!Y1EJ>rjCQY=+`gNQ)CzDjWTvV+p z=U@M*07tZ1l!4(Wd6U4S7IK_W&%N+}F;NtR-Yp$cKI`dUv;k2tu6Js>sv!o-SXt>O zI9=WMQvb`k_Xktlm@UULpMi4DfA;1Vf~E7>?w7_osIqYMFKR&BBqQ zm&emVg@|39iq;P0g^kfDzQ6naHy5bAOu94;TgzwKlg4O*OF@MmDt?<~8Ib)@Vq=BN zZ|oWEfD=Z20lJXZhi(z{MN;gr>dubvjW3~Wt3j3C&L=@_JoEZjn}>dYe{Y!q@g}#0 zrhJdKaa3LO(^lboc(EUsl|Xw6bjndMG8g*y)=k608Fz|lOQU<$#UPUgbBY*zT`Z|6 z>GPl->{d%klM)-BL7XG*bdEI0_eOo7#NP91e*)C*YyZ$lmhw)kl!cLs53+4KRmGjp z>37|=(k$$|=OBhkiBhY+f2^lbvJt%nGd&6O&liFvwwnfI_EAhZ_QT1G)Y0^!_46pW zlJB1~QGBk2PNt2-uId{2tBMzrhv3tBlHqFlT!QLtSqpOh z%(Y;Gr2`rc58WoAt?7|f@?+49_X!Rdm6h1^N3 zOLn7-b83O?rz;8{DEv|6dIJ2YSfen&5>ddFPp72|y*URtI<~%R$snE@ zBr!{q<-$Ie5J!-Fe|P8fbdAaLO#7Qv!yA(cc3ar0mM~h$V5vxFw`{Cen#3vH)}BDL z$m8XmOI@H*SsF!Wvxpd@saICBN67O3dHt>fCKYZ^3r@dQ6KH8GuIv^=W(jprTNcqX zNO#vw7jU#vqeY6v5O*+U``KsAh3CJUJ%Y;-~?2Dd_&8-;Vt}J%#@~Qw4^A_2+ z4H-#CvaB_FA_QQgH%uUa8O%-7g-Q^j&PtdU^ zA16srv8$X{f0B~@9QuWA-rK0)um+o^ex<@NIiix(@9Q8?=R1eX^C={#-v>6>ciTD4 z(1@#)+QhC8%>sCoeNJ#uI7e>uL&A=7`@}?D@H@qfwVkJtnZ`?A^`$cnV7_n!k zlWs&U2&a|ogC^5_0fvhvqSY!9dm5=N6l<+Bgh-=7Z+0z8G?)-%OOTAp!DwQD?HS!g znw~->WNP4vM`Jy~?87F!Fj4Doq2w$FnW+zFooTgx$eBkR)qneeVg&zB*>zu+C3F%T;zxch>$eM|rCUlg_~0+{!yosFC^9 zN+|`%6eeEi=c|}`?pl=u?I8JCk5Eu{e=F(B6yFjNrhU&c1IzDa_OtMoog{>_@#;aJ zXArC5$F}X(b(0OL%Vr5Ko0g6=T5a^&Wdc4j9d3S_x2}H>ZFks^39LeQg!ull; zo%t$s0uI{Jo@89@=qJkFB^~ha2jPgxbC?tzT;YKE>$=0lGWLve@@%g zr^5hD675iJxE4>j!#9Hu{Hx3}tF74Uzu%zc`Kv_Kxy7UVM<*5f3pC*#r z?S4=zU_C_bQFiF|6E)Gl%F?XLe{+=+_Jy`Su2>S-p1R;*QxAGxnzrG_K*enf_LQYh z>H?cI-kbifq-;V&DT#@)e}%IB_Fv9{xQfM}|i zR07od?>6nxQiAOg&f=Z95K%rw5jEv(h3n|t~vSAR!CbnbbXz!s~TFl zu|V=fg+j|UbUcwYaMj^x4=zxppeL1^Kr0YktePHslW;*_KBb`??A0I146c4}Ri159 zppC*NwSh0hA3QIu!PyXSl%pr_P|D74I&+f1y9}EDr0Voh7Xuo$fBncEoB$_s?}YFd zUs4SPc8BSt`WcdpO?H)$r0A2N&H$Wn@NXJIjpI7lQ*#z}-NQp=w1^MA<+Oi~(fPcf zr%}!g>=BM=Qts5GUVpt^a8Y5q!G0CAf{y)|ZeSL(z}uH7(1ycv@(+WLj$)3&zSI64 z(cg{(QjbJZY_esRf4!sCtii%%z(I|4?1dkb`_MYq_gWrB$!ZF!Jwu!sUkdz6K#)H7e_T5t>WGC70Hr>9=tn2u z*3&08uB>sOCQNcR=>M*)BN8u?oqa-V1P>tk(#<+Ag7!&{U5(Ff?sP9m+Q_Wtx`Xfy zOq|F*?TVQhI<_9OOOQ_`U}gpA4HZP;Tt3>0!e!H?dRG~N@Tvl{)87a$Aa#I-7HlUK zokF7&o$h+Df0r=_loGnIf0gkvwh8$W9&{fr$Y3}$<5{AK&26+g%_=o?tDWoi#n`V< z0bzt9<^JStO6&XczM%1>44|6E^G81O{yUDmz0W=MuAuAHSUszF#>uyWc>T+w<|S5U zCfxa{8MtCeE{G|h0}eRwl&897Ri_zywYp8nf4dfBf7@7JB|iI+)~F>_ladh0uWjip zqpxJxFqD{O?Uh`GBg#jxIIOH=B9LZ~N;hC}-sPCDSaBE)@}1PXj;Npyu=;h>XKa;g)-Av6 z*r71RlG7`js#K>uP)=5}bt5eVaFoayUvih5WvnJjF=;|CP7C(AsfYqqVZd|&QC#k? z!?I)Q`S#6?SpK2-c;Y;z{0B}4@ODJ&)`|qCeuw)@4>&yIqJ zDz%8Igq;W)Qk7dEE@O(Ea6!iu4l3&!J%f-jXB&FQ3EJ|UjzmgaUBHofb-5v$2}TMk zeMS3y$`qgp9GRlB1$*=Zj;DjuR=(sgd^$9=)xAR-oec{WtKbB}NC4U{m`*hL?LtHd ze~Bu_S>;tau@hZ|H%Dcr{|m^`4+MC%jBlZQ zfaU#quU!+4PMclwgt^fhJsV^ieLB(91zY{VtEuK?mCcA&PBs+TDS}z999yM}*v09O z>R#RVH>9$d=d{?MPP zi0}z`m_Pa9U;M>i{6N6yU0vO4%Y@n(%M>$7zx%8RJ4&!UQnY48agj;$nMs0kf5_1l z6e)%8?$j8_+I|a04&|U*W;fTBA(45Qa2U1F^R@M9&r7_C(=98Nb|sqXU=418LB6b> zDWjm}?vCGa#yrTndnLG3PrV(=87jvu5DOB%MP$0v3kXkK^>-cMAAeIm=k@Mq!utKV z3GCPV7QgOx_utu&`|vq%xvlD?e`=;dl|%6QcEX`1`3;D(m2ZAmK&gar?m_d01sqg5 zUbvo1W6CpeM=i5w?`ZKhzHFqo|LZ($CFP&bzjdu5@vM+FW53K@;ExWk=Zc$ba42T_ zJk_P;cbf85Wv89gBY8%&%=U4ZA(IX97e=+#c?Mb({rwAUBdABf&JNd-Q>wYrn26 zO`dP-r!Sv~ADgd#KpHys^5btEJ*9!RVq}}-(PX37vo63@3qK>bdG{;1#d*0o${Dx8 zv7jhw;j*TurDT<+fi$7}io^aTjL6z2c8&jFO(jV0eJo#Ku!7qve_-o)D1cMQK9sa` z_7dJ!=}Q6^NIt<@Q6$rmlzv`ft6kU8;BjF-w{3c3` zD<$mB`JU|z_4}T!BuV-q<$u4CFt~>vy!ddRMki%Bm}(AX3MER(scV)MP4-7qj@3kG*rbKkp&KVMXyALH#|pQ~59zB9`&yM5Po} zUefkarB|%;BD~W?Vw{?jqFTFlfYES`fxm8_a0s>FV39m& z3S5Gn4jNs_e>1mvE;YLAzP3tAfZkI5)I|);sU#Bgk!%t%YbFuLCN!tWw$U!WMHQimW#I? zp!xB5BFXq4cij@xwkG|Z?H8RoNTHrp_aW}Hs&jo4fAbC@QQ{&OQR%t8qqvUe6x5a! zv%EPZ&$8E1Zd5!s0Z)?Gx8Dtkg7<0O55JGB6`N_9!mv_dHcKF9s^L~C1yvs_(!g#? zX_}U`<`qyu8_N#G98DHME1IL_EG;o$;wT0CR~{Oyplx*)oL8Ph)>Z*pc|sWZ2owM? z_`M9Ne`I=6uKDfT-(cuBSZ!@0(yC9ZZ@Z(*k}wWc-*f1C8*W_yIjk6>$$+nh=BYGq zyIGZWR~1;~KbX9BW63gH9tAgwsnnt80NDvf)Z00<#(BfHIZYh{96MTFzcnFlF(404 zzZg2z9qZ>BN3Jn{&)AWY^EiXU*3P|aC7bMBe}(&`i8}6*L1+9ATCz0CtkaUvPt(sb zc%aDxXIDg6p*v;Pe7A-bf42LX?B2b}nwP}+&bIWPfxl{u449sY0IxmepyQ9>1Soap zg_k#PIRu2v>Bd~dE`lSnr5Zk9UCau7UdG7i_i}8K6&k3Ck`Hv}lnQQVT%n3)#8wgGcp``1P~WQG zf-(z+Q+5<_1{Zd8RSuq_P*nhbm^jCpY<1`|lEqjL_8lzmoRj?!4?K2g1H@n@dYQ`Lf9pmu zcfMuh>9{&~3>mAKZ1<;y-8JQLBlGUG17vg}Rq=hF`9!fPt@D zB0b#8bvz5V;bnHm3vMBcIX4sCP3C}c*;rF z?v&d5>ewNvi=A2j7w%tI_QU^eZ@YDy6weLUQX?U6)w;I`bg-71MCyBbLa^3xr?Lh! zDn;N_uC~pNkT*e9ypmsq-8?HI@t&ttAFuS93tf`u&V52%+GBG?t@D7ee=*{zjYhjM zb%rsM&rY*Re17e?^4I9}%Cw zreV-{w>#g9qw;+IkU;$&M9P2p!Dsaur+yV`zazg?Cqoo=wThYeRnxR`0uP% zG=AFoSH{vZb;Lkgn8n8Xj$F5&tSA1slqZ@j%Fw&b^-jyZYe!?*XZ zPSE;y*uJSmV}?PjHr3N%r_Uc)`C~vV3S+l&Z7n1BNp*ej$JR=n=hw377YuAFi)CN2 zRMwQtbtNIV9j9*z93tP*)CsllP3q;)xE1DS@$;EfLui2H5wA5Wnf{v67CoRo4;QaO z5@=8$wM|&dX0YTgY=$9Kim*`j?ZIqmp}YvpwQj0RJQJg%52_bHa5bc6(VW7KlOerb zUgZuaaGc)Ww)A)0eWWnvQ#_KHzIoOi&x%J!Zf&U@;VIH01gA=h+e+mDdma8O{j?m6 zz@ey;@)eBPe5=FOKq1e|>lw(~pA1yK5&V)sv%0`H=Ns<4m0)I6LNw*Mb6>SxHNzE3Xk6%oLXic7*W$sNL%1ozP>y+S7}6neEs&WamyJ;C1|o72VLYT@}u(K z8;zJ5AQWYX+581ieIbkc)1cZ2kbRssZyWkxoehqn?5tkt<@b^OPKRc|N8jR1ZW2!d z4+G39QZ|9NPPUo3TaZMi_+EEklZtlI=tExE%->mGx3c=C8+hR?Anal6=vEZQt@Y0M?` zX)y;`WM;lPFMFhY7YfZOhZfr@I#C*#s$D%k2SDQn@ztJUDpC^sCCui+DC%LXy&Lu} zSG?HavHz<7d@B>r3CP6yJV9$$jRBO&mD=)Wk?j?zkt5>^0*M^*=HB*W9_ecv zC_pOx=A9tigwCibI7osyB900pE9%i_j1#NmFS5k&lw4T$4>yUY72GVfa7~B5-MKHg z;@c<0sS!5^Pyeuv>io#!DRWX4Ko~}7z#ZD~!cR@qZ8K4|JWR1={<)@aw@`EiqW9Jt z(Q+W2MCFu80PSYZC-e~$=-lpUngOvPh(ISc@V(2aj4g>}BE>geSR@g7cqKgk60iP} zspqETedod=eXa(BB=^jyQwx1b%hIb;*0_gI(o zT-!*(fIRAaD2|Z}R#YLYIP7hmIc7f6uma|MnoCBRI&sgB;-9hNeYDRcB3}p)coo_F z&rqD-QoreCJR@ z;LE1ER<9VoJmzqC$sRX_zs+d4v{^*o1@6!^PL{pC@H8AlI*8>X0n5fVu#n5ZXrSO+ zi?J_N$!3@eJk!bb-A`7-;!Hw+9iUo#uPC%TI9{3_8QFKXU{(Lk%_v_YO0qa?@+t10 z7$~v$h#di9>oRdSOmdiy8vR|tM+;5hyU9=+9r|!yhxt99&KD($(H4*Ggak)6$h~u; zF^Q&ZnbpEIe1la)tM!-J3qoim$C%Q*b#Ew~6@ovv3Tm=Y2Jp({kAd247B9-}q3ta}otsel&uGkk z{X#gI+Nt5!#$G1CW5#?mV)Privj*(h5!u+^5!dOh1lMZnXo~pzAEK7C5)my+f4ZSy zddTJ8Qa3;MudznX#%_N7!RSv!Fenc>7%wW?l^AaAJc3s2sGdKO1|iFGVq&@c14+Kv zJZyrKF4isr>$Afro_>{u=0%H=6k)x-p9zFrywOj|tF|FV-NCzonsLBqI6wn^Xs*1A z->-uGB;R+7iMDVu?|Rozrh2}|NX$Ck%8W4uV=&IuycXr#asB693zzOz6P27KVbzGC zR6h^6&VYT2V=6K7hT|^A;=3(xP!EkYjS~ajyaPIgD``>i4e;_tCqaEvLBDa}i&Xg> z+0xxqpwl6M(*E|$d2%0u*cov?FGtu+TQmX2r>|pg=Beg6vO^B|Mo$F0k_fG?jy!rw zDhuwU2ZoYdVRdiUe;fUUhoVg0fTqf*bb~l)QsMb$+(e1}S{}gm@gJ8vhze!2L(B1I z9($6Uk=e;(zP$5C1ZE|y5Hkr`6dl<5Xu4<5b{L#Rds z64l=RXKgRTJr3_Z60%j1;jBfg-8miz?Y15Txju3VS>+@Iz9^Ny7qLy%?IwHUc23aenwB{k`BP$SPH)W_<8 z7U~4NT31Cf@X_F5?~$^Rsx9e&^dPhxYuQ$ZHS#x&TAJoH!oREqON>W^82k%R3oSAr zS5FH?&#g^}`9*vdk}^AI3gMjnNC9*(yD%Cou%?T|)Rh9sNYTFw4P_TK#dtpM3ujQ! zK|~$-iS6|9wOCI)N#{J ziJPgrmFNA@)^Z|}DmvlsK_F88yO*7_S>y28q$WT0`(dwU)qgCM=ruH2?F{`{69k(q zQgHL@>=i)IU#X@uIt-GU|KJ#WBfyi|o6f9MJUA}Y+gs{%gv#Y!Os^d`-tA(pN_&Uyv-y(*+dD4-m? z@pJ*tbje7ln0Z=`Lz2?Dy34w+A=NeyJO1j##p$Nhec%$St!I50w4tWNl;nEkAxf!7 zWb|>;*F-kr@#nPx(V0W=mdO(MVV=1o{m(!SZ(8tJhbQms{dxZkVqm#8g+ay1D z)g3O-$>L>}2eaZqXKe^5+lvXGdVXSjIqeXiOd*q&--(Yu{O{K`%_w{VhnYP6rGD#? zvsF+;6l~E1aw3pil1X_$r#PwTZND*0YZ-~$ELtD8K&5I*+7z{?)W$>vH37ZF^L(w+ zs=hT;Hip7##OtX;=MRF^+++qpEi{*c$zTVhDrH4ya(=*YC2Kh5%u)3>N-6=toLgo| z^RFB=pI^W0{K#XE^xGAERdzh%&k940J0}acPL2Hj8ikMNRzdpHJNzu6GhZ z635C{M+}R?k0^^5JP{ZtWz|2mo`O^i5(FS!WP|;V0gV*P8Y|xqa-dM7y;P zVy^87VL`16bm-xrKt&xRIHb(##~-1akH4zv3cv?dLx1s4%NYg552tDF)0cuBU!`{4X6SLTL4Lh9sONBM1y_8id=cvD|bJt%bG9wkK7refcV}e;rAD>{=X)iw#s|ode7W4k{J@xlh)mJwP ziRpn4gP*KjlgKD|VXj{!qp3eTgNpqYP%dr+AjIg_Rw;8tShxC3I6XU0L9zWgua<03 z$Jf*2`msCr(vdeotf?#)ao;~*y#>6gp=-o=W!5EEQHh-MyiGrzFlqwR z7%ONTY_Y2Fexaj7SV4odm~*5a~7%nN`^`xu1I$05#ju(BrZzgNdJC z_Cx)+yT25z3F~9N{Cs-7 zclKXRwndJPT$Dsc6J((U$rXo`d{?zM3Fx*lo-x(*jNY|n;i$EF#)!RFffC7{dvg{S)N zF7*%Jyn6;si#B6uCMuSurX#076W_fO733M3s}}OxQ)&;d0dz%df}d%U^hNcn#|=ln zzAU$g{V3kvrNnFlKVRoD?_TJ7BZs11eSL!yPJS;R7=Y3j=Mn)#eZ^v=7^Vv>Gpw&& zEBm0gtcOz`=tp;@=EjkcQX`NTp>nuK87I`NGBj(LwUEC8t4HZLwkSPrawQ{Ka(7jS ze$lf_=8$Qt1G<5vq8gQHfX?(K=g=pA-~6d*I|~H1j@H}m%PkF$4g~~O`TQ!>i%CCP zBV8z%KEx6Zm_a1F5wCD$G<#FLqm3FVQT&QXntJ?~YBo*BQzY<__l?Vv{x2>8(Xp{n z6G=(YiAZz>LbMWSrmf;oTbLR?tf@StL<3kRf+{9<1qw$Q{h~g=?*B0dc@m_hjMSDk zabfdVs7&}oY8G1-Ez@qayWisG`Tds9vn`88-?hG2K_z{^U>*D>)$Cm31pD^lyUSd} zg!80*YIbw|n{C*8hVanv#({c#H;CVgbVMM90cp70t_?vLZOgG*+jQociOS8k zq+d532~@&_&G@bz+KlkD*D*8zgZv7Hsz}xCd5i<;=vDz@Q(ei&t~xcNC%k1cCaJz( zjHmXyM>urIX53h?LmZS|BhUM(3e-fr&4o2e8jt&P6Ae_Fokqp~T~`hwQa;+@yfC#c z`7Tmh9v@#HbUV(dHhCF%%sHanI5+L0syk`6f(T)Sn*){ONm%(!&V<=U(Y5G}AT+(Q z*y4I$_>&=U?{?MWM`tzdn{;0apD}$4+H1rw*)>diU0raUA^3#-5mt+=7h6JwOdp)} zqe|js+#}5w_w_j|cyU`;|5)`VN0DCrA@~MxonAJTPEFplyh`bob_}|)p@zGw`u(A9 z8#EJg)lo%~AVj%r`a{sbWD3H{iAO-VOS5W3jK^}I@#C?^p3HBH$3cc%DID+b{4<|? zqT)H5g+_XoRFHcNW@OdYKQin1qhh&LElQlB(YA941v0cK_fOq%=OIr}gpI7M1B_ z47PShcf<$e+nq;^Rm!G(L+N6iGxYCk9Ab?8ZmPlF4@sl3HKtRH(=Eb$L-0(@UU2CV zV**1N2siyR1JT|mR|eS8%cNdX1{^-p-yp!c2HH`Z??l;9JrMjzD69 z@ML>&_XDbhvczdbsX_c5)T9daflM9AZkHw^sto?eyn+wG(*V5oa`nsr2Y4+7 zT$(@%Y8LPjYn3poJpnqJN(8?*9x`Uau<+nyMkc=@NW?SH=Gl4Z`g9XQyg0O>_THll zNa-V8h~hIDcHg|#xf(zOs62w7K{Z_)gLaUZa zG6Qdyd>$GzzR~c3rQ|`b?pZVF2D(wyn4G>^#rVqB4;CD(tmXxCnqf#0$ZQ%0jbKcz z^cy9vG5>b9E63l`%RkQB`2e*Rbvzx{nx8x(qP3tf)k_e9ohlcU zfgVVPejfVcxK_yX_^A97y?JX@schAFW&2#P+aop`E4@0mi!fY2!5Hd+~oPxyn=&&sTWAvpswbCPh%N#v`!ZKk-y_wz9_B>@K>+|x23r=jF4+uWcaG|H`3dKj|j8ziF@~-A$sP8>Z&hB z%QJi`h}D$}%L@;~puyYp{$zd@G_6crp^QgRPixCAM_*wJAyJSCllPQl;G41%PvRm3 zaVBzdJ5vNjc~aqO=^Bn5>ADd4#?}JtRY-PV9&b}6L~IBbqs5O}Uy1br1ba!R|2XAT zI~$bR9ThsmaJ(Y2uvTqnW(ROX^D`Zzoc|T(3d$#S=)f08g8%^ug z4sH}hlBp?!+{Y{I@;#y-JCIG~eZx4Z{PdT11_FndY0hQ>9^>{@*SC9?B(z+0e?rpZ zHDK#C&uMoGUn!WtLbWxKUQK!PEh{%IZHP2%pS%Kg9VRRu5OWYo3sB^7SxuWNsN{%0 zdFNPReSbAfkEXZ3kT8O zdn%gtY_BVIYIM6?Pd=xx60y?jguR}-(JRr|jYsF$13YCKN}POr#`9>e1xrDRh>p1H zEB0F_DlUZ?nWHjxhZo~x%^7>C@t0da8_|x^=Q8j6XWtzW&03+QntOwWjIC)tZ%;{d7>SPxOtN1kKWBX}M z{ogL!3Q&8z%;Gw!C)dM`-~&~?hS1jj*!SIhFhvN0BIy3rP1I<%I9Vm(6vJPZ9UVZw z>DT3?L&#dELW95|jkUG%!&duR>epM!>t~6d){vYbKFCaKYl<2@J&X)VwR%RoZ!V{T zT(uy16%q^rT+F9*#6aznexbFW+KWBQE?wZaT9c*w7b-+z#mS;A{|2UaUi~6TO~F4I?}+^w+3v;_JrF78uMl%U8Dt4~M`j&9Yf}gEb5- zbD+1c#&#b;#c)$M=tFf}xB8odRI35PyA4^X%;(0PQ!7lHn)$oRDr9&xVK@JYspNP-H zW#m=&@Kfmx^%<~?|1$o{4qF92P@8k-y&OLe@V)+^2(V$xsfyHIN~wk3)FCNAN;%?q zSL0-yZl!XxR;Fh(UL#ayXaX%!OamlY5@eFYz5p- z@MltU@6_85&=xq!3`UP!i$;J@l4mT=h2b&6Je;+mhxTFYu5^*?Pm6Bm5-Y@AfN%o7~EbW=Eta)ZgLlJ1wsUuWuwvO}T{>*W%qki_LN?^Ps zrUY&s4c1GX+F%pIVL{R3>p6$k(PVXjR)erkOzY$&Nns6XCEZ^Gn_O6?e z&T@^Df_7+D+O#S!ruvuUjVzeG0;}_;u9vHd0Gs%WO=P%4RF_}!1b^Oeog<{rB4ng% zhqBL@?hh%o zOez_jg98&I&d${?hKw#<{K3xnt7PWrweO0d`ZC8S$h*m3W3(SitCgHg`MkH#BJ<24 zxUFJlt|p?Lp|?Vj#E;?iF1`7yc}_mx=V4UAs94~NOQU)uB?R;rvM&pnulCh;6q4((Ce8d|CB^+h9S;Jd?#SDKUH67^PR*qKVT z+Ybmvu_UzB438REJLI?8JP{n^U)9ZNW*L;-EELTyxgc4jCb>F|x7n6U5{CX@&FDZ;RxFR0h=q(=}|?`65*0Q?euj&3VN6R(gAp;UZcD%5UwS zd{P=x!MMu9z_Y^dCN~wsctqZXB?B~8xHMjw0bA2#pqg9?fOT zD41fZ3)jOFYEoXnxozbgO=w0O<=aq3_VlUu4<0Zps&1i5m*nTAXXQ8UuElRQ{qfO$ z!Jwu9v8qPOR{y9U@j)#oqm7t*epuvPG-4mLKqM`Jh&$h2Z7= zuU8LZSp7%C?sr$-VRcA`akLug+t)Wh^|^6kvO8lE?6dqD@B_S_S9%mMV|?8G>?iUs z6#QE>wPmwOKN|6+`m}wq-?tu0IcxGvIk0^W^+CEmyn7hlB7b=CWORJv@(39i`IgYa zI(+6@Uw!{OtNA*^c)MO+oI9W&@&k;ry!7qUOSQr6Icpcg1@i9Y*c+^>0wR*cN^g@> z91K8069J&A00WB)zy%;7Ap!Q3zy^X1{X>>80Kh7^V-b#v{6AAB_n*J&zE7#c0sxqR z|NRt!(U;)J;od=D_9ZwHSRuG%6F5BJe{q6c-rvFCfWI%n5&sXi{6AP8_+(vpGS>gX z8X&7_0My=tO}_`j`roktRtNyF>M|VJ|4_Itzf;^Jf{lmZ2<-lwLu~TS{}U1bF#ZJq z0RA5iJrn@I+u6;6-QC02!P1@0$I;=x7dMt41B~7iAba3uC^i5LT!AB}{7+Fr zxS%R$?=W=I|Asl@0>CQou>YUu3LFVsCO!ZhzXFHP^nXkJzqjH4eyR!~7;_m84;LQc TKMA0{4*(nh@KXF95Agp0PYz1y literal 252601 zcmaI3V~{R9u&zC}ZEKBf`x)D|ZQHhO+nzPHZQHZP^S%3=Kl{&jQq`%hN>Y{FS9d2- zkOl=q1A>Br0#Zu$)dBin4f#Lc#NJrJ$=<=4!Pwr(l-|SE##d=jZkQ3S_X%C~)^brT zTVur)r64yW!~p6qU5Os1#Uj;&+UviPn@#wP1gC~QZ_l_$rn7^+@(LnY4$?Q zxL%=;$7SqET=`i^7NY{1&}3yUQe>QJjAN445ijQvacSU$bT6|ixk7``DnvqD(nX9U zl(nFwHzTn4&Sfb>_^di92*(vaO-5+!vZ(9;%9n46V^`PT<=CiDtNbX?$!25HKO6&i zXn`D(pH84pN!z=%=~VHSyn`-Lq+M~AI5S_KQ{(lYwT6Ui6!sg+hesf^9Kt;P!+Br8 zZ#_m;+wYKb91skIJQGl@)ioKeH2u%90f(pieDnq)5|0tz0*h!%U}Md0B_2s~Ma_v2 z!F5f6y%xWE{L)=j#=C8{?stR(x&liXZ|l(NLWqb5`G}eRpbFBEP?^4`%{IV5K-(Zd zKnnlAsF40QDnkc{{~?vDIQ1VXq@E{q#lNYXfSb`uykeLT&H$~2`wrE*X3HRyttR-O z{xMsz3G93~^HCOShVCDn@N?9ftJbPRTEG!h%CcTROkmflcp8X+lF{3B~F>Dyxg zjz!({1|vTgJ^#1AEG`}5Q)l|e7MQ@S71j(9uS3|+q?R|+@;6jY0>~VQE5!O@Mq&C; zxc&j+_w3LmR`8=|5~XI6K0i$7W{++9RC)F%R~$u_t;Yn9Wc+yz?Utw9WSEpz3uh<^ zr6_xMCapVpAzfffS_U(#ERSe^&g&pcQpo`xct4hQG+&1x_?t?Tx-IUQrIf?Oe5D~r zZiDcLL*x<28Kmn*@i$z^X%GL;{{b^r zj`g7Z9~hPYCm7WK4aV5j*~Q-W|FD^Dgc)K)3q9B=huYXuflOR%iRR={`IoTU2JCD< zE*tIZO&W9?7f#48x5W1?QiHUCY}Ls?^9P6y9)Xh1{=1YDFgUSqKoC-J0zupDwx&Z0 z9x(wNO-p3WRgPv=x<0!PpU!1WPby}wl;^0#8aF$Xd3^|+%&oGbxDkr_PU6G${&30m zEsbEZclWkyPwZ`5>}S4(`9A@7unH8A{@<=2{w7k{!J7KCki= zd`R%>uE3}u!>gf!eb;|2J>jzL7Wx+TrJ|4LMs<^N<1pfhZvh!Il6q%Zq@hkr&W~D? zOz>E(o=czyU6!|u-`4?li<-8zK`pH`6>j;7KWnjhqS|yg@RVAkDs9P}lchT4fuez? zPdcOTDHYNz`=;|BcSN_|=I4nsgUSig^xQDu(r$Sr#yO}vI?5&pn(M!hqUFPc65P0<@`(6ydg!Zy+%OfruButd!F`9#&#Uq73?;9`!69 z2^MM&0XMWgtfl?jAd)Ge0+v2(o$~$a9}kaE*;Z-+$K}83N&+Ed9i!yne2N~)%$WqW za+!$dZzV4aRz}!7*ex4Z2q)Zg`X)JMg09Jb+G2w`Y+;aInD+gfe76uF_IkNATwKaS zWnA!>9E;-clY)|GIU$d~U$4lwx`THNkA?K0=~wao9wi~wx~p96M5sqZvq3(zoRcI( z5c27cY-Eaf=%EC5xG@I{crr(`3|FOa^!I##|BqsSV8IOjM=?Cm|5r%;&vo;E6#L&= zUH3{mldUyUbmZ$JkB(qj(*id|-6>UDpiFp=-?1uMQu%?@?d2U7ptI{(RK_e%%P*`+li0#hCIiWY^XHH^Gyy=j9^#_d>wu z*JD?8smpFG=yo0MqQVi9mJd!?9hXqiXfHr?mh4zr|K~ z9PxXe68kNhTT89{z!Q38J@5Q@7z3Bo#ofz zcHe$p@xFZ4<=cPMRfPvq810NZua#PV+YBPGjB#*|)Mi?EUt9ie=v)Kyq{slKKa`zPwGDZoQlUM8*<# zOZE@YUB=q;<|}zGPS3vf;D7F_34Y(rcV_T{MY2HJIC3| zV|5?ves8BbeZ#KyBK;U`CZlde_VSlo@Sd6DcPTF(zK@)kR$bZ%`4_i3((Ie4x5z_a z>WC8;<9~$s_8xNY^?mP>>ptT!|Kav!_#K~qT(#*e9sS&g*I$Lkog(_b4Y%vQ41N;& zJ`NHR^nL#4@qfJ~%kw97Z`t+@c#q2-H~wrq=bOa!VSmP@Y5URt{%+jMd5ql=#>?{; z``(TA(eKjyJe2>c`LsI0)9sm^Toz`?kCbK0@vLFKXr%bI7LAn7Xkx~{NB3oHc42kP zuDM8mINV}HM`Q9q>$yJ!{gm)LV=|=K)&6Ek?ye{c+&@Wp!e*9NtADh&VD{C{iDQoy zu37(1hpb%re@r^;0OS#|=Qy6#vYj-q^mxXpl9~GapYZ?PSN&%TV|V;t$2i)z2eEBA zz8zHAg?>{M_Ge2bJgZ`+JWd5OCmL+}UxGZbZaKyN?f4fCo7&HaePLkQ7jdI2Bk`bj zQfp`}h8NCVeW!pD+qZauZ~d2zvI{SZEhA3C(P&IEx1A>d`yXk;5BZf=)n4rKF3WR< z&3jybjPuFBJ)>)Bc4nBa{Z2gzk#-hgd%=Gi9po3}A8TH^TR&(2T2Te>9CUm(&|F*~ zyjq9=(7kk)7%{y$=c(E_9?D5x12!_?-*&o3{8!QaHLf3+Oho)XKtLg$m#!DV%yoomh%9@Y* zS9N9j9lC-zL96?e3jB(UomTfdeM|dw_&mz^Tim$aD?-!pa6pJX!a4KwO!c(Y@W0Nn*6geztoF{_AnS@P zI}V<@E;kj_VW)X!(rC$cM@K;>qfe3PVaLL2i!UwGIBQF~G`l@5(C-uzaC>D?)sp9K zQ++1*TGMlYQ!l{LieVRFokweM?bdV%X0_SwTH>)YU+;8ITzTP*>X2!% z38|G9(KWV-AkBbJt+&TIZ+IY>EW1GW(J^5onKZgsY7%h|zA+4E9Dy)lLq zA8X3FEk{$N)%k;s#))5uIh(d|JROxzbTfPzOS+|!Du1C$NH}S>R;{+WixedbU4Lyg zmVmSq&~^evz4Gj}5tsQF6#%ntZbda83<#Qn`P*cz2gya|m5pAn;VJj(2-}_&2YLaK zr`t6)iyxAN*c$?QV#%Jo{z2fWTP{VSTR|jvm@nM#m(bZqKld* zxDN~d3mX=-o>H5G%YQyQva0>17!JhnAPPV4cmr`S+fpOR&X>=PrkiS0J4(8V!ePKQ z5%Lx9O0^ZR$*|ELi6LHHX7S_OowGYQMr;kbzw0x5nTM}WOckLRNm>m?V9~?-$Ql)F zmi=r%IWa>3wJ)x8H3m>X5?+tCVlv!ISd}GcM&nO%7`KkMd1@GOox2>FA8RZ<>h*Yt zf2x5a)Yth5LmrB0Cu!pPrg84}h_KbExY%5!k?#19od#@}bmvc(MalX#&77AU$UI1g zX$WGC$<%A7(`5p$htY8CBOfA6k2t+nQ9hC*(JR~>pZE%qbeyc&yuCGIuNzJpUp+dS zOq^^T$a*ebTvtYu)MshRRzjgcOCWr;!NQ)178PoA3vDlpenA({l6CXs$8t z-Whb);nK6gh;5CkaY*e@@*(^n+v3jWuCTz_HNw<4vIrg4rtQ+rh+WzX8_k=O#VS$6EBt?QSoS1nqqIQ-ocO)kwn@096cnG#(X7x*C zl$a=ve;=vA(Q|^^sG`zDp!?;(Y7S^G8U|w6@{V~72T!zOZ%676Ol#a406k-)(PWq< z2VzD1n2|9@MzOkXyn+h$2spRzwj=_No;$+}(QM#fB8m|$v)dSW|7lGA-HS|Ka-{N? z5;xJ<+0cz84E$9$gz)&>*&&#Rlg!J2->|THO>nERid=mZDip!MGiSCO+hlD~Imz`U^%Q{os7E{Q=u(cd5`Kf} zYeY~FQ9M%MZyOUk$LQ*3w>)y#sj;+K)8%PP;Mh%@{wPao$GXu$$F=do>fqAOkq-7R zDPR!YP|f3?&4E@#AcYc%;Z^KAd5=El%TY4flNSq@253vTq^jWu@*TGC*HefK^#z?* z;L+i~9^1?Fn<+~yo!x@Xux$|w|Hq-Rrj-I=dB~!xL|NnCm3-*fG}>{eyD(lOTbl1u zK(*a4ZsDGmu!P_B-Y-wE_h@C_Y*hbmtOR3vi+cS0X%aqaSJ?Eb*hN;^@%H-OFU1C9 zoIpaS(h6Tvgo_7x18R@UxbokQiGQ}%dIt8uNyOWhv)R0aPUjo)3~a3j3|j+Tj@kQ~ z)hP&JE+p7=>L|=;Uxs}HZ&9+U`8hGXg2#qdn|LT%haK=Yoe5ruJy`l1GJqsgq~S=N%U z*Br6|uXZxbbPk4LsxU*XW`#3yB)XxGE|H(mkQD2wNS1MGP|Vw!uoUXE-guej;zY0q zd1+4*_gR2e-fx@DEF_sdS!-_r9g7r&D1UMZHJwJzJHc~h6)Eyr%psyOPSguA9)gff zIE^6pGB4T5fCKk360EE}06bhMsC6lQ5_^$2I-T8`D|04s!ZT?bQ4`sQ zOPKU7z*Uj}ASo~dJA(!ITQR{6=pyOTW%p4RUrMMUZv_+4f5r13JO_t}cxH5_-A`Ki zQI3>lIC_xu?elQ$+iv`j9%S?+4ga&K3OR9Vo2NK*`S^jxMbIIUfRCJJq{d4_Y*~&m z%lOIf6l>N8VCYr*P)G57wsjeWuvcV{JTen}xsQJLpZ+4BafYj8qN+I_U z0!$<5I>Vq&*WJGf1$HFfmT5*ZC_uf3gd;3Xu$;S%D2qeu>AA)ou;bM4t0*_-E#Io- z1e1Y>*EyAf&`qdwUf_I_=zB3RYuGw&7?{Fka%dbdccuC8Ao53>`VcreV@e|7ykTIG z!SUCtZ7ddxNo?821PNgLvT)MaYhemW;=37wmcy;e*RyoJ1cT!TlNf)TLgS})PrIJ* zSOg7-+k_*-ktn>W`XC+1;xf_Nx~&6#xro#>S(6!ri?W(8E-C)fFIkt8`tAcS#Ax}h zlu=;1){dbuHG&)z+v-X|HWqnm9=ix}N=Yp70STH0xN$$>9Z5EKLJ1S&)K)+f_G8lz z-li}n0fiECgf|+*$wIaDlhQVrF!^_poW6b$54OXj9@Zpei`e#&9G1j9E4+;u5Rov@ za>dZC0KKcx)fz(y#*Uk0SWbF2Xt;xUG0*qUNh0#w7OAZ`##M$>UXq>i(P3!a7k=8% zz)ew*r`Nr*p)DeRPZt%vw3oNdte455l|VF;O6&v(J^3n9=;R{)X(bw{ur--FGh;`+WO{gOC@jaL*XWTXOEMs4 zz#K$@*^{8G5REHaOd40v{KgdRXFb_L@4XYg2H78{&Mur+pO)Cc#GJcS+n^Y4>Tu#w z=7$zN7}`(;aDxtrlF0@=kcX5NCD={BrsRwqp_q;^f*=p^(R;3xls?_%x-a;;Pp%UD z-nw#QBfk?KaJ4rXr*VYFBNsXpEhnf)_=#{pBjKvT(DY*Cm`RY3GD9-{N|@!kORWye z$hP~?O*ob3MOkd!qeCFaa`k({F<2YGIz0TBj=jHKHfbPdA`dC`;Z>kRcqfxF?h7_H zjDx8AAW8(l&nT)6=pcXjTtzzJ?#3!#tZIh4W(~-5sfL!Qj~Nq>SM1*u*ka6FqM?-L zw8f+9Hw}fFjo#P+Q+Sy2-?*imP0l?jh&Gk2Z4MrTo$`=|KVZT^%V^zl!x{*1^<%1v zT9v%m3ZN9&WhS6~r)MvR@;Qs~1)<6<-55Y&a&cE5Sd}A*O=9}=YZX`c=Hp=wUdg{R z;CJ6;S4_3ZCZg0C5lE4>Y2!zu+Ti7VZCKeto-{68FLOY62RqUXj%esk)}qoP6&MRu zb1f)|z!kn?aRYZ;1{^efPA1Q5BlcYU7gkBv{q8GKeLv-PRg;y4jXr9xvJbMYTHVNK z82!b{O%(M9S8;GZW3+KnTs{%rW-w}x&vWaUhFwszaSaGeJE2_?PL%R=i#D3Pa$t@S zcgsPyK|3eO;Uf!2gMa3uF|8p24jY(_(3~b3{|4bbRD*4lUoGLBvc9BNb8{(&6ij^@KD;w{7O zE1za1VvsGZ$0~rjrf4nGvyD)nWHyYe(#G7bid0&XW3`p<7TrpX5$J)N!q8_RQt5=)S-mkWWE6M?-eR1h{9$D(sP|A6&~+C zbt3PBhi`X9mg{#*``Wpa2fo?%lzyw00$(k#v-Mg^om6U7Nrtf)i{}#LG-X$jYDbXEGBZboe_nKu zHJA^GT$myOy{~+5~u^)Aqn~LU>_#i4HLjdYNhf zikk7pR@|rP8R6ZB3iVfhf8I_!9h6Kc6nchK@}_Mb$whjd$vpg+mD~oXss}baNnHy% z60Ys&d5HF~I>RIrpp0k9bn`gzL_iK`-xlMJIlaYMp;}N>LF(JfIzyBTW%da{Byq=@ z@|(fR-vgU1YvL3KwJSL@iJFWdo9YwmTCk*K7|qdmQ*{7(cyP$c=t2fXQjvIi?AhWX z`Jt>_xD{8e2?KBhlO-Gsd^r;~7zo4w8*sd+{Ryq0b8ciCtJ>u#w!*XaQV8&P27$v$ z;eW2iHTdOv8nZEk0S5~uHD}ki?8mJLdkYo)y1G3?+TFouep*g8bn&tMCo7&?B5TNc zhwI&_Y|n63)v8%#G&F@mH_`>DS}H-!mqvYk{BPMfcUg#EzC+R2NQ@>=Ao;P@Z5Wvbz#)h$;ovnU5HaehRF+sDY1zOPT%`_x##JxaJ*DU;4>W9Go zalM{(qXU8VTLd3*pOkE*(g9@-Pbd1f>r63!ZuBCB2<-bf{#NPfX5B>WO@)o4^lVh9rSz01Z4OiI?5BuQB_x6onc(0Fj9Ql1^X0& zffLavu%3+rxVxL`(`(ZH?l@BlDmB55oQu_63+md7ZEd8+mXkTx?z4-?`&t` z+i;rhyE`}c#=tZerL-WXtN^$yOgZJ}^WOgk?}OmXpM?r;xrl?*@(TAe z%tih7QV3{I%EgG!^!?z^4gG2@B_*#2howQnh10_5iho#RC)Y2)wzAb0t@st~m$&B> z=$CO*lW!<@i}dxHn0cbN&MK4%a=x>YJOrI82n*?eEzArif-yu=dXb8?^JtQE?M(dT zUG2J9t_OD;m*6o;pT9eB|Mq#w`HQ^>KTzo2&fZg|DR_tpm3|OOll$PKck|I3BZ8?f zkepQtlSz+N{$MrQ{r>W*l;^V$g{?vJ>((n_PU3qLg zbdtKO+OoMSY2*@fXap?wAJlATyH&P(?eJ>mizZLcE?Qnl1Z_$6xVxdoop}Ujj2&ak zQ9oY3-R^cnn6;!XQOSn zUE?UpClj+HCFSMC6KMHzQ%o zaPa4*0}3jP>t?hBGwBi;sG;20#j21chw5%AkXZf`6XvjOj`FkDEqaO}(+WL;=zZ~S0V>Z^8X9=7u0eL98WbYTA*Tz2L zX1@)G(xEhLW zWpFk)w*Wm}tj^TN40q50>lXLKj$=44AiNPqob@dGjI0pn3c)5M#dr>CO6>GHr!ENl ztVz5UAa@6N=e6R2w58H*)&%$l4kcNsVM>&X`!lV$jIjoyG}Od< zk+F;*E23xO#Z%|&otE%Dad%P}<{Jd|f#KvyIZlCmP`s8h5$6mI z1Btpw7Wzfp=hDFMRA*M;PUF%K8;>LQtaaJ%Kbhrp9}g9Hve@I0htP>qYMqkIto)_9cxzj=1rx?@KoO2LZ$GaoPd``P0cyXufl8Y|?P5-lXGiZX;rCNY;8jZ- zy^$Yc)|f-0>e*QvtIvU@1d16Ev3`M%EkMy>4KeyA z8q-rrceHCH=j@e9cvh9jSJs6Qo-Fv?wF_r?%zwJ+Sn79`Gh`gMtfNOc=k2w~jP`;I}Gxg`6ZPO8xMMtx4x?gcrInL$V_2*yU#eD0R1V|YEw;)Y@0c3pQa z#oCk72=h6xNehs_#DG&2gF}oxIDD@&Z+K=}c}xKei2?Sfe%*lXg!~b0uIz>gZ$yhY zR3{>-p(Sl^wbclf_W^>H8p*7}$VL1KDhKIbip^SCWK!W+{*s%XzWgfDa` z&-X|XxTiYpuuue`bT)aAh9*C&5-UeJGe9Per z$!BDr<M-{F&cYW-?A)O1qw2^Gsb*9Q^>-uL@X)FzBSwkb%|{zG|E8;1?! z;7Ivge`s;3=x0+&{Omyi&}^w1I^8=DB`L)}xhAQ^beE3hy`}}dPMH}pMbie(*sAHX zZhe(<9z(;~4mkr_`kB=w$Q8T<0WVZrd$V+(tSgr4n9v9Ell7CXT@C!K4BGKZG29xa zrS8lp-C-Ao$G8_dJX8tcZ5Ir(UwrSFElm2fI{mjbhEKKK0&BaR`ZXNYP7cF!d)%2^ z{lvfAYh}6X!V+g*L^nOaK*VB*l3CO+%O*DiG@*LPDT4BvNOGQE%eNuF*j2CX*r)Rm zk@5CKnc2{<%e*2B`6#%8;Z>|bP>jkOUEs>4mEE2kq6?csz~W8yGYL=)ev7hCI$vg7 zkad4uTP6NF=tdI0@5633v5il0c{pI6&#UUb2Qq9w&Wre=biu=cdZO~Pej73S85rmYK&`kULN z!x2`uT@0~mF{Tj^U0QHL^HlPP|BOfIkwy^pb?!SyTZOq9_i`@{R)Y z>DBHYtu`JFhFvVo?5k=z=fSzctInY44h0nch1H1zn3FbTUe{v|y=1c?7y))G={Slm z30^FP8u}LGsSNRe+&H5#z`(+9A6I{mb~oqJNtxjT|YordBPwt|}{LVu9D zAB9QB;%BG;I*5)>%`)=W1xLw9I$ZKX2(;uz%XzpE0-n@eExvSbJ)tz8hOik@6fM`6 z93z+Z^@XGNp8z_mquhp=lCvDayZg?i`dB(4Y-h>?=?Eum8lthziBbnJQiK|EqrL<5 zq5Z(?ojA*tTC$IZP)*;b_BZm&5q3`7j5Fo4q@nMB%ph|{2sbT(A~30wMHYQF!fecL z-1gNWyUra;C4QS%J>pBN>oGIz(mG%AJe_I|;{}db#K(q8Z6Sq}dv;PF@Bl-Pw9Lrp zxqoY@q8%+UpJnSEOY{{C`@2$pd>3+{J-V%zPT0;y5+f@xK~IoqN$=1dd9sxR|0K*t z2&5}GP+E=)SjjDH|F)CCHf*?0MdX;RFYTO!bqQyZ5a<@t5bRdftxK3c?5et85cd2o zQ0D6d&m8jkUcazc+QwhmMEr{*9AbXwhWe>xOFE5KxBP6iZHuLXJIDX}>`qx? zXiUc$2?H~6Tomexo^X5M0(f%7RlTikB+F%X+wpTd-?eNWqB#TYVbt^32zr5e#&hqA zNPw}dBO})>?-y!TCmULDm7rZgUNGZ8-JWfbYYnufRM`4b?TUk>r8{vVv@yFX7Q%$h4HiKW;CCl5t?~eot zdbHPI4j`xN2i3pLCl(*l+z%BNrJZSV$!#(HUD!|1h6N!_J7gWCQc)xeIZA4^#re)8 zMxlF{-UikYjSmV?Y>0#Zu$cR#Z~1KY+w8M;t;oqm=MhFW-DCqnk{YZ^Pl%irSJg@N z_BU&@9-bqNQ$c<<}hb1-$RC6K-n0jES<60iJ0vr%4o zW?x*|{Dr?5ouyv?%et)iFER1vGrp*|vEN(tHT)K>M#NhpJe((IWn^om>ZiD^#vh1+ zJu$oR4n%h*&}B8(iRoigU|{fQSPCXHt_`>QDXT}QcQk8PU|x<=G9h+Sl$fn_GAqfk zSHyXmwwjhWWPNepmLZpABp#xDX(XOvlNvd%P^m0W6KtUC?+z?;-sbP}T#I_%DziQE zGZaO}Mm%z*!SGW1#=LBS6qsnVlM<^s()CKsgYaGhN!{;WRIOQ(toYCvylY6u@ggrh z5y&`#%5~9*sUypcnfsz7IcSjpoi1Oq57AyyHOBsVqbRBoK%oOB^<8Z_<;M!gwB(z$ zly+KU?#^=Bc@f<{)oPc&hKj&(lf!xoX^P2D#7<8(!R_2JS%>PAJyy{jvVELk*!JTQ z!m)^p1|sTPiSL+GOToUBdk9?W$_4dpc1m6+_(QC`MZS?mun8VPH%~U%eOwKg<&DBY zW+AC^net9yW=C3r$7P0+r3hJ_JAO zn=H6h^d07G-q8WchI$(e${}w(&2229>NHq30z%-Hw}6kSPr)+DBz;u*%HJlYJ!qT# z3b_;z4RK$Dl>7JQ@=#rjxoqdtJX@QLA07eKkydhUD&)$2>MF=LlGWsoqJZl^Htve7 zr+vdV21Ws(E`V5_5=~fzNXnQ}LX4Aq!vXHVmX#z+zQI+L?Gp=gZRglqEeF%5>}l7N zvncfC%jqG*N)*SRu?uZmVJU8jj+%W+Ivgjc_v{3m$N8|rXJkY8|0-MeCx=))Z|W#0 zoJJw33MhPADaU}Fv>(2fw>-i`pSE1ti1sYrq7~x(QkMupBV#BTsi5phe$O)M7 z_?MySuq5xr5DF?sVQh{H91$M|NbG4SL(LI|66a!A1~yy@ryL92%q15+e)4ZjW?HEFQ zlMRpd_j{8R!E6;2pbYB<&@ZOEr=gdy>pMW8a0KyTGHhIP6YT<5cn=y%eFh3E;O&|c z{S-7(s7)JvE3(*}%x$SYD3kCd+N{v|#N!>8pk4^!iW9?5D3fU?JP~(bIiS4a=?!I{ zh6@ufhL>AhZPnu@POgom5-qpCxWRtqm@4XG+fR0V(_HOk9crZzo>b&FUlqIBJ!G2Y z*!G2?@w$uJ`FF0?y3T*S^r>!~&+qq-JJ)A-ZS0o!lUgRZD63ESV}v=SWiM|rsl%z{ z;rlzB#&yRuY_YHGLdK6db^QgI{j*h^3124jPbE=;$SOKBKd;(IZc#j_ZrnTVB##n( zN~t<4CQ!;%U2e*IqW#ZJm3Dft)x_aVIHAwigTT*oJ)*$Z`G4O_khf*-K}1~y%Zx@( zGHT(eN9IxEywxtn<_tW0fv@}Ea6~2H@}z6=#qyKC3A+?%yUq&%@wgHRIZ%X`08lnX zs5_D^`9sJ?B^lh)5q|KG9vABiD)NzB@YsFJjc?*3moD@TSyRoy?0>pr1% z?2SsTDs}SXZ6_hm{2a_$*HkV>`1+2)Z9J`IC{l|?r3jnZwy+&2BFomSJz82E#YVDj z37o!840%HA>{hl3$5>T{cbzM>;@bmG!=ZT97FL^dAuPS;=P47>uBg}vXSj^nB=!`O zt;5yAzlEvbQ97c8rcXe^B5_l;AxRV3`W{MyR}q^c9q-g_`vl|%bW9OqmK?K;GkooB zge{fg4HRT4;Xk0}EX6!@94>loM2lHO$wYy!ooQr^bjbECkqemE~EtyjH4$KHV&y(A4c(F2}9&0P0U z8MlUE&QEC_xc-T5)o06GN(sTu4k$vg4KbKtT4S}-n;0rwpe`=y~gSb^RE zTIxDqtu6kI_&DfCz`ro)-ReG z=Tai?ylY>BDUK3|N8SfJlXa`BEJN)y2a7JBV8;U7eh}TX%nVaRewH_GXt}kHh?jLkM#<~W>89j-y z>xN~gefsGQyH^rK_2YLw{z6hrP}6#UAS-c2Gqz($yk{D{4hC1P^h zD^e%unj6bEtb^a9{2LdIiZak-4<<{M$qrAyXdOlO_eR*8mH7aRTmrmfUK3Kp&j(vr zX*#kwUUVNvDfoG!r;b%z@ZVj%=jf5C(Dh9vq*4l|zgh_R+;Eee+1O>}?$3WIzXwS~ zx>jLVGQ5swB5%exCrA6FtjT)8$`&+KfQg$TK$6NN-g1U(=OiLNRKO-1+R~YF%6|fu z{d9A5bOeb~X($yUv^dyHW?0gsu-CQfg!Ya`>sE&3G5^?A;n$!`;avDnlI zm1dDSy|=2Ak&zpG3?=#7bM|sZct^W$wrU#>^LNbu{c%b&u;Zn-D3zPh?RVWrZ>mrP zx!r~C^eyP!<=tlo%NxU)dj?#5Yi=QrjWs1j3p)*ajvMkT#gn=a1DKcr6o38ocxbjx zXt;=1g;XBZ6)9fUYpg2#+Lt~uePp}Uk@TYboC}kUF6N0?RsCOy3_|_8c|-36gGM?Y z?@KQIJGh2sT#u%)U!?aF*JS?a$b1ZF5NR*{=UEO*K>tLHkBwoXl$o$4`LrCc7{E3^$)!;{&t8fS5eiell9%0B zq!jgp_IxK8_uK|Ti?djKI`k$BV&~6>^kUu8D!a#j55ON;`xcX7Z7mu`iM_qv*813Q_OU$povX?>z=)fAqhm zV2f#+l$YDa)V(5(a9flrHn$Mw4<>tO^7+icuzSa9utivDRb#|9@}WX2DqY|3ONcjy zKXUNu(i^GtK{G-*bT{0-9|PZzfanMGjE8-MrHrpfD-2JCkz+-GxSH2oMip5qsY;9Q zZL*S$42ao@oFv(arc1{$EG^Rp1-^ORtzAW2#yGoyAa=xJ%^DAo-nWD_-}tJR(>8yg zn>ZSx|H^EQh2C**7tD;YXd%SUj_XMyyLN9^NBNo$(I&@4dE}ZV?SwLH+yf&HhCT59 z42iy$LJ$f<+MG1z$AegvxL6sUqZ(w5W^J6PpKhT+GSjprMoC4ukh+DX+a(O0OP1ML z<#LOFl;n$*5y%WGDR)n%CThb`@z<&v!SnH-G7bZoDAFBT4F=SWMnD8Lb$dMIR8vvZ zLJJ!O_>I4wR9!=a+K-6wzk}{6j?Aci$Hd2efRt*3X$*RZ;7Cfz)NWI*K=zegQu)y# zqV}g_X6Y-!DT6_kJe?T8(H#CMU=0N&Db!Iq81nRm0MwPn480zZ^l$bXXmSBi{eY?c{h56U)o&Ing^Q2Ah z)XM7_vyg>YIMu#s#dH(YieUlaDcVcZoX(G7XCTY>2t@J&Sr^Dq_)5@|Q5LLvV1)>n zMpg2mJ5k(j;XhB3i#SZ-#0u%OuKz4p7GbvZ)<+t5(o3CArmL;qhDgY+pMjz9FW-tg84omo2y$&KiNjimSJwE9` z+K9g|lSlC?wK`GHjvlo2Qcd1TY`_z&%3HIfwsg$@J%+@|+*40ULwSR?aiIa3?Ch54 z;?sd-?8 z00X-EO5@M12r#rz`kJzA#mn?;r+t|uv1pX@YXbu)Xc*6^a3f86?QJT~Ltz{(NfOW5 zz0@Zs)BxxU`13EhM{3-F#m(_(Bp>&Ve6y;RE-KIhN7Yxn@-B`O$NgGdgmwpwmDHki z;4kZuYgbt0vG=ABC5^p=ZE+BwFCU$`q{XKyt1WmAyls2d@dWT#q_sNr^R{Y;+B|Z) zRYnOGwDLLBZ+4o5h|~|i1@S!7B`R*LdM?|52HvwD<=(^CT~;-OLX!%t+V@};8ZygU zV5D-6V%GQId}>+0JDk!9!gFKyJl_j6XUj*@kR1Mat|ajC`jQ$<1_X_4T1X57X~%Ey zgY|7#9j(|s2gVNpw`#Qx)()80UI`uAuZ8YA0U(2e5}ynlq_XCJ#Ll!c)Lt zKC?mXZEZV^Me(ssOkNr%zr5ZBHha;>-;5PCX^#_FQE|&NOVp^rT_%cJ;f4`{E=cxe znQ^SqLyJoe*>?WGfVLQtO{x2>Jg5zNc%4jXnJPr&K4+wMR^z_L3!Ph%FbeCPu6nD8 zW6eBA60%h13cz19O9x92;oIB6+=Mv=x{&KZ4Oq&o$VaVCwGb$z58Uz*8;q~Ph~u+rWPv z$Y3&Cwjg2ORH^iBnlCLj;g+m%Ns=VWwUJ|$ltm++ig#+{3@7f%XQujY@3z`l?nCpN zpK2wTsgKSKypWd4i{w7qZ;O?Xw~!}kil;OD}|Nx)stHyagy zn*n$E(O_DkXhZXVZUTg0ng7A*(KIuKO6SY#4_7LBtGSa-)e&bbn1%>9s1&Eo!*X+0 z?FwN_wz64mUZQ^py|xD6H_>6?dxfe0iI0ktD22YX$$v1)VJbG{F(cXY&2p=I>IqPD zOGYi8vsfFp=VD6ZN(pc;w%0QR)Lc~g5|S* zxFsGz*>%y&{*8f;kLwk>!d|qPnlhUcUcMtj=Yx8z=f(hP5y}hZ(_C)hwVWd3*2rAt zh~dkC)lXG99Ruxse!b}X{LClh_xkNKpc#TK_-3a6(K<2!kW4?07B}Pg3@gDS4*6QelMbPjuqS6FFIsmtEqy?A&VkpTc-=u# zKg-)pLl6~6f|SwRD>Qkj4WD$#2Mo}gs~BcTC{r_=!8?W6YcA;uEnXGirtgMw0sHdM z>cCGm$D~>v7#?m9r=iR@H6&LLyK!n1cRz>qveTM{iTefIF=*T%D(j}%f{+9<#Je3Yb0v`YPUXGd;$|usi7!XH!a9bEI@Jrr8d^vFIN6r2!s>4r z-a8#9$J9++^5!=D>ky+nZagCchigFJN)+tg5P#;G7%^-iMm%uIc@n=Vbwi#O_FCt| z-$|?24xD2&$|5IAHNJJPWWgY3gepTEaS!ELr8-_2&bGJ^l&nHRGG+^Vw%WogY=Jl^ zgKf4MtS9nM1T1=a5*{#Sr2&vqTWDq5qL#AYq0V8J>Ui9*T|=`d1~+CJm>zcKYk1Ln z1(q6!dalD|+-qz1;Cepp@_2+xPEfIQK*z^VR9)*9aN8%6TxVbZIFYF!lSNOe!4kh` z>BOo}7+Vgx;gG>ycP6@sOQuI5<<5Q1zCl8nplrOt%AJ5e%6LS5P@bKOBQdpHrF79@ zvU9WCkTt8;Zqv1wf8Ho3F5AEfS?*#b%PG*|J?QkXe{Na*WxuU;^Z`&K76W9LD{7k- zX*KQ2#BBao zt+xw0*9$_1OqmkW=j~Ka%6pUDvs*)i2fW{F4ZNEkvL6rU@Z1w+t;E`QAw5v3{n=c={|HW>ds^oHQ?@Q3{*rr{S?%>rFmvYpI z{d{!s!_nNtXvhsky;)#PG6AR+A8Ema9QW-sddS1z_;%-<$e4%XrwBW(_h7yox&fcr zn0uwFrNu2+i!VY+>fbZdwO+a&J7Scl|uh@#?nt8-jf3?MZB;NIrxzUI32yidb zwz_L45y>5%H;ad7WkrgkRxyko?o+12E)JpMRS_U-jYvK)vG9b+VegK(q2Wo_+acda zX(CC5h-$H(``-{p|5E#pHb7F5b98OwJ@0yE;KBaNd13Drj3CgCj7ZV*#FGJDL z0IZA>+k8DIPXj@A8&T{i6Pu4#3UkDi${&r{4EH71avr{7{)X;MJHHwBR0t0hUN23H z(~6cUBF6@iX-2IxwSl#R_be&gzN2?*mH>q1XR z)L{Y1-D)V_inEfwtlbHXp=#IxdWHt^Qa%v{x?bD5^e3VZ$a*y7iVqlRD|={SJ0~c( zEo1H)U%Jm>q^Qw5zVy!gRul4=UCv7W_XuE`Sxa8{p7&|bbD`9WY)Eb7#GH<9DH)DH z-lC8#IIc5gU|Te94CIb|S8-9=#=U z_KMrxYvk*$HqcV!VR%MGiP3iGb#2H3^BBMY1qM=%;XLamYkupgH1y}1IUS=PT57_F ze+*{vMsP`d_)}aGA6$b=;zNDx&a*Gw?93(c9@N8svA!|ZwWX2b2VUyIM>tp$zXY=c zTkuB-!wWYUyeLdt0C5jM+$VF41VKD@S%XwN*P}F66^dA{*MMvZ7ZW@NV zoQk&}e)Le-C_ei50owNT(*|m#q$`|wTgInsOl;aY%i4EE6k$kS$>o=Df_M#gTzsy| z>DrR?<*VsGOA7b0coj6mA3ma~^;0e+n?R7Y(oR)s?u<`c$k+w1Jb3oexLE?|nMeR9NQFIL zGqy4wh0|Smp5;8i;;kp!G}zv8u^*HTOEUk0D48C{cq!u+9bpSVA({4&FS%}8b4`*} zetwf4D=$CG1Az6?3^@WD4Yfk57)swA8vc5pm`OSz*TQk>@n7o1_IeB%x0aF=Ws|3* z%#Cmy><_5(mu!cAZU&K{M=}90>;wvn><+(_LAu$jS6DYZj!GfVJJl=PA3CW8r>&;s zNO9ZEjK{Juq;|WvS&){~Y-%RA3Eh(Ogls=c+K-l3klOvYk+%IlUukm7MoHN*)BQ8-ze>LcUGsQj25)@^yu26or@|nuBVU+juAX9 zCNk+x8n={5(r(HXjh{<$oL4H`t5g4ErZtSE*E#?6UYxQx<-mj4F0;MFI9sil>UKdZ z;qx#+O`-af3CxGWh*_sI+AOA|Q&OCmkw%K5$grE2%5*E3)tC-nuc?gU<>?Mrhc8Ow zGJM|G>kd076h6w~N3*+>il(fXx=wO-{uD|M? z+bAB6#82FrNC|SH#=WQA)M$@f?MBaLkt9<(x1Wh5E>=!DxN9BFzOv=C4MH|eZtp1T z5~|X&mXJyfnC#@J+Pmud%@BOE&=X}&Vh&1%lgzcTIqq=`?yg_-XF{hmR~|T}3fAp4 zlu%Bb0LF|El#QyWN>BZkb-;2N^y=Sn$5>Ie~o~Tb5B3AoJT$SjwU9V3(515cU zshmL78=DgRG6!SD_PxN46(inoSx_pj@Z1Nkn#napTQH^)<4QOd(*Ow6%eh?@@}a zZOXNaxppk3$>*t5oHZR^PGa*&)@ws`vw3#$mn~w7(14?|vZh$>arL$7Ay~jeX$&1H zGgbT0^mm`9tvCgDmYQikqP z3gv7k*cb9z7KJrZo_+V&vXDr`+ftkN*9Ls7Y$xh{=Wx7BkGw}VdnX3K=vOKCDgx0Vwyg3u> zA0gG$IHi8+rBI+z)V3osCmP`1C$(Vv47giW_Uw2o*1qm5VOT&Jr9wr83##fT4Vh@L zXFgS`E)+^wH)KgN0E9z}wSBzd#F!HgN`N16)eAXUiFtgxy z3M^EcB75Uq(QmHnEfEJyhB+`Cwm3Y9v79&`cIG3bG^Ly)6S52+-LW@SlJPmO>_==E+z&wYOMEUjr#+%bV@p5?sbU+Mig<`7IjD1B(w!R!NTs zl%mbSU}gnEC>Zjj6sg*=hB=org4_!ZE~;iQhLb)Yr+e@Tdk7$*y?p#jbZpMJ?7qI! zMh|BB0?8N|w!>rM^Bin#!|v%5w)WuF)h$sY_l@+x*)>g6TSH_SIP^Hc9aFwB^Y~_J zKs&IhG^OjsxKZTy*$rZohX6&g7Z=C(=4{<+eDC0LQ|alr0iRhFK!b#MQCelCLZ$b3rnC#Fiox7 zn=#$j-8w20jVt@?EEzR|qL3h5EYfi7bk0j(80jiyDl{ly%; zhUqGS?_bGU3;Hyq!(>#D7x#xo{o<(7c7G(Q5Rwlh3sMHGe6cgGLsEANkZ*X-+}sNg zU#UgQWWCOnn=eLYD_b=~4z+tBhuS>^LbwYJIt{%+nuI(CVV~WsT+O*(iQV^DMWyVsUAG{E&D2AxdRZV6nC+&$<`h6RvvH~$aWN$ zIwa+0PPBAFf8jFf!bXBHSL0yCm&@+vm^Y?cHD>531J8+@`%j4IqeCPy{U($(pP{M(pD)} zBx<56e@_y2dUem)v&w$VEYbWOqN2HoYkHehT;*)mI`GVN?P{}U9N=zvHIH&3Pe1!u(~OAapp3KYx(!qg33NdH zjy!$a<%$?AG`wb3M$!g}zUIDm* z<*{`(_u%Wns{e=M;w#2QNO8vuvcKGLnrKzWrcb-a`UzBS3hzKvJKGX9AqAdgk=`!* z?^YLodBEZ@-yq}obIh2NXUN}iV(sGJ+6Ob#&sh4yJHR2`vC!pDn$>fyZ$c@XNuYhW zEzqtZt`56yqB*lH61cw5G-LFNLz_I0l065qiJg9JB93%wsDL7^({iYtk9Pvs8sjEp zkCEMo$Wal$)3SuqT52(aDHiy;!dD@m2af$QmwvnZ?Ev%XHX=lUlU5g3fIZ|rcpft) zU@(#&>GTT58LQ(<8FX2ylJ%mwMdz7+Sf2=zPWlX}T@yv?5%$*(RJ?lxG>lq%7ub8m zpmUwzCj-I(_UN8Pff>{j3nmMbS1=e&rEs3`aq81+7!k?YV^%uNR9_w*dpb1Ilx- zR>Fgbv~7SY=TA#?!Pt>$i^<1EXWP=yP!#y#%Wbz;%liHech}RP@+bzP%8i_TS-Qc9 z4907jU;$-g9muG7g##O^OHQIE0^2Z2d zFsL41cjV>9PDGuvie>H4IMxF>%_FCmJg^v)W=IFP=@s4RZgtu&f9|c({X=z()+fe{ zlc2=+wC&sm=Zk%!*5xefI)#qz!cGENre;Z_a9xBvB@7dDmfnM)aJ0FKg3)oHP+;}T z?wsJt1}T4LGmzboIjz8w9EzSRf~vZioNwdj);?C|moMAF=Y6uxO@3=~Fx#k%C;5#V z7wd{mcX+XUMVYL&vx%yKJVv$w6q!Tsq$_IaiI5N*izBiT#VZ<*VajgPkVV*sPnZJ@ z&De|-04bCcCXJX+p?EvnJim9G?NN^ot}ArGJV|g;yHyK67-A00JUIC*m97LB9u|d= zEU;6oOUf31*C)8L;$K+yol7q@X03E@9KeP~2SibMO4^rcWO-IW2#KRHc`hTlF4CjG z<~7reJs$0f5!!R?D$0kqswnrh?)Zp*eO2p@kFL?WL%+D@QL;6=&MLik{0Qsub)-#E z5wQ@*6x9<}87=gk;&Y2M6{*HIxb~^PjH4oir1z_!U#g+>jWbkaSfCw7Zfyc|@nW3j z4pe%Kq9nbe-6Tmil}<7?p~lY|9$0uoqPzfn`7#4#A(uLs?Oqf!ExX|a^6aX}%iP)` zFrPGDNH|=j_Qq4=a6~b}ip>hwfTfq@uD<@f=53Pt>_vTMW%wyK#p2>`V@ysy#+~hF zRzTNH-nZmmF;INaV3QzOCr+l0%Kpf%rIkRX1-@8-8(|aGv_Ds<-5=|L~X5Aby-mYYk z_BFg4xQ?}+#v|!fGSH)#>k~+>n^XwD{8D*|`ij}rhZq@*&^K{tiJHqXx};rmTu?{b z_8B;brZzCyy0sUbsJ((6rQIEGLJIft6Sa2C%#mmP^Nws)p15(!l69TsRv$`SC73%> zx}}MBB*64DMz9_{kZI29#SaR?QDnIqo_pHWB7P^=4oc!J$>NsT^j>Kwc}{B)ekJN{ z`)*mYYsuM85b1-F-;F-z8E7e@nl2w=lgzBF1&bQ;$h7)yyT2%hDOO-?F3=J}kV4%Q zY^@M4k|id}JUp=(2S_IAsy>B@CjkVO zF3eGsMQk5mKG66jeSEGgPRaqjN|8jCGTNc=80TeQk^>y*=9h4}+R)-e+>yl8#gEZf zjCpgkryz)<;hf=QS+}1p0>3~D8V+=|D%YDK!ch#x+rOm~%+!_-#83|buOSLdI+g-& z|5GkaoM*Z}*q-kEXeuow zPYQQP%lpFGMF#$4!kp$}Rv1L_r6>e5$UB3>~F9Zkd;ClhjTs~3DcRXwOpB{2zvRWyW# z)(M@nqU25At@&y-pXN1rcCMFS%n@3N#IXE23a9;Y)-$-wR(_6({=-w^G9X1#a@=`z z!5GPQ$(6biQS8sh)mmVOUpB%$c~~icp_gNI2u#v9Y?&$4tPB=Uc$Ep)*Dm? zTP0-5+h<&ywAf_N6rr22WG|Hy_v$3rp&j5DKb%Fv8w(ysaZ*gF1if!s?{J7I-~xm! zgTG0Q!^;oM$_(=OItoQ&G|Lg4ZV6T}HOyZnsx6hingM0q-Lqpp+iHy(xoCk(qrG@> zLZV_Cw7A~HimT$3atbX#K)#A1;(3E+i)K1|BO_*Lw*yz~jT|1-=EaYBM4><@?)|w- zSK~L#0Xi$ba&=Fl#r*GxfpKr_EKSX8YFDG!LQdyUFd;s^HAYGN3`7sCVxA$bvQ(P? z-&1BWL%2}-A<%w$p*6#O2_F2Wyc(?nEHVO7uI`hdGTYb)s0dZV#SRNKb#y$qA)1LO(tt} z${kNTr8V@CL@{QXLgO1Ve(%0MLGos9A?yfWA)um-`kC6u3+%^=MvCWPP{V1C3GyWn zA*>Se^Gd`rOoQgsV@`eYMacM~r~i&-bWP4C$5xa-`2~AMe)?718QYpKH^v-~G<)q- z#+zhz$!lYn9CMI(&WyIvN$+dIi~_)SglXK*Xb1B~M)XmsjFlcaw$D~YRSrAcwprq@lWlM<+NrPCnUJDU-^zRebBU?uB16f$esT5Qo4SBmvFG`Zp9i01FQGZK zMSVA*+lFio^+?G|lA07w`(PzKlq9ZX(MtS!7u>dB?$6Wsk|gz$G`sLfytK4GqUnZN zVWm=HQ&f$VZJu@)e;e(Rh(g?oGEZN1Um=r0@L2+aKv8R73UedYk0VITY(~av=XQvf zP!J^u>r<_!O)#Ay?GPhQQ*)ai;Z7z+-$@e~-}_LL{7GZ9pH-i80QgqUT9$CY41$$& zq-4$CMysr<)LxMZDN7ut677c_Gq~0YYPsD~x9m&aa!H%4yNvMKNOA={Bd))i7H1p{ zysDzv`e=gWDdU`IbA#^SJ>YXxsNRu6Ek~*T6qUtnuKfo6!XnfJ?eYQT67Yn%#)sYc z@#6nsp1T1;T2dg$(mTMZhP027A*C)}(0fi=%RB_S9x#scCk=P?hBP1b6X|g_Bzb)j z$1Pq0V%jYuUJm-r&#bR`?+SJL=sN235@orsdgkMws-F4e8r3r&tB$^&$!dE=_TRpp z`E&Nsd&iHCA3{Yu{kibA^u_ickNpov>_rI`!J%`IH#pSPXh#;Upor=;|Ng@b$PjNl zRZq4%ZlHG@+G@X)nR)kNW7u^TE}lg}Rt-rqyny3<*{mXxQRq=sw@35(;?E?N<|6nw zY6(UMWl;%+D&o){8yC`CGjCmyWQ(B7$D<}u&MF|sZ}StXZPga){%Jo;U|wic#xELgmR{d zUAi+SoM^{Y-)*elg>+H^D;x89CVPx)n$oS7c<~J697d+Amh8@+ZbO#g5unO{9T|*d zSsb(thb!0Uhaq9@A>Og;k0tf(4QGY4w&Y^L9z8BS`oH$LkuYqtRIJ%!i}Zmn_KG_a zl%Z-s5(Wt*7ME%d8?6^yUA&MkA1}aUFX?k{86{|ymkTxI%@5FUK_CQXDV3_3+mY{B z7&kdc|33f#0RR8&eans{$Cc%;IJjuA29epUA}LlCK?0m2)y)B0Er`;fcY>#fM}(C; z+=KqeuGC7~UiS|Wy_l|&fay)|v}0m^L|-y?&b{_<&&YR#<%6{$E933vX7_pSIam1n z8DWmCk?bxZR291Iix`Z9JRGmt()G zUWqG`j6pmcqdBr)5g5S=vuPX8o9cx4{ASgOS}!i==VU1cT$!U*fMj~*^V7GU@GSIZ zUuHl3C3{tNS>*cc>9aow5{N?l4Q0px`R;I5TjT0A6aq8eh*Xo0f)X+|76yFvq6O#$ z!-Lx{Gn*ugwKv}W@29_JA12&-cVWV38BDl6bcfj|PdKwT=cv3NhzV1ybEIjwM_6(r z?9M;^b>^*qZL+)q(I$uv1%`^2v<)h-A<#J|i7%#@1<(_3UU3Q>`wNZP(fJrLQ*bjh zHY}_sE!#13e2^ufwU2g#j2<{bI!bEk=zz1Z<64V)5-)bi2iw!PpcwxA%u(jEK4P1` z%@>_?-VyI^+GSq5IBw*_l15hP5OfnK>lY^)v54ldL)djo(y8SA?t&+36e5xBoFpMx zVOn2{oIARkPB{heG1TSoXTxrhH4c*!SL2_=!+5$;R;mlpCRTTFJllovA(kDsj4zE?hcsSQJ*=TWpBC&soF$^5$;gO%D^L<;pw~FW_q1#6JQVmJ4xcG?m5ejPv5Q3R-rww&4NsW z?4PXib}17cSoGd3&#-L3_FHpyq~6$Rv~#X@Sxak13KbeZUVD_QYKnPjy$ucR(2X>( zE_Md(FB{5apF#}%qV14>$u<)oo>dHycgc%;< z8;HEKTtWkbf3aRUDx08&u!6S(pFf&Qf0x_z;d57NT9-B;Dyj93a7dC+1-3#}-R2VV zhRfhk?>D{89Go$Kzw>V&b-dqEm`?$&zPk_@`19OQHfy;>UFv7LX4fdK{Y+PAMuy$P z?AvdjJeUH@BhB8ue6=XV5MxUCsE8ND<4Vfb9yKNLp3`@A*`g~nVsz9lSc_39(PQ{A z6K)yM$}f?mx>6I_EoT{<0B9vhPC1jR?y^SXONW2f3V<#p+-SFi@CJ6m*?6;Qh7FOR$|gVs8&B!T0pkI!Yl9ZUwRyEv&*n!w ziH_*O{uH3{da{>iugf88u@u#rmUY6NGNzou%5oArjnz(ktpNwaQl!oI?43Wu7tKL5s)@7=S%-sTM|L2B z(+SN6lI5NEbG@G+oQ*2Q_H289vxCs*`oC;vL6S~>jyQ`Ya(2ZF4Z%L^uY zopLf0%npl~YvQ**@awLYX&0X9MzbnkrX3XDZYhGs$)117&6X$z%y@l7TKk0j1kR_a zL+ePC8H2TEI&IReiKQ>y1Fg;NFj69hoG`119EypIuv7XczHVumrxkM;! zdHSD&jHy6-A`*Lx$pLZ~n(HuT0Kd7f@z@l7MO!ZOc8*|X**3$b+!kCXLu1-A%@wHA z+0r_Y{J9jOXuuBIn?-7*Zc55kj$UG=Q3%q@z65Z6`#U{9sq?jiP{|hWMBa`8L3to! zAR~l&vT|UIV>js1AQ$LQ|GSUW9_rGQO~3a#$%Fg}8%dNuhji>F`@dfMjVS83 zI#&p)sv^2zh)M0b^cl&Eq4fc*(WL3ooz%suZED8hx&KS4OH1j8bKsLLhkA&jkJkKA z7)sj`vZy|yaRo$$!ombE1~&~5!k3&ZK=G^QV2~Bw0HmEmL?;;XO&{#V19;izIGhVN ztrxutmCn<5n76(y!E(xW-`CR9%SgaGbIG^f$Gz^-XsBaU2uoyVP320s<(Z+#zzbCW@pOyX0gDm zY+V=~b}b>MKrK7D6n{?B)b(W$*iU+oIPfkglPmHm_p~LN1Vv^=_kDkxz4m-K>*;^x9^<#Wf+g&e?ooEzPc!I*mZnImdj#+>mXz9ET=dZ zvv;xH^i9@dLIEx}Y=sdZJ^ADkSPI0ILqeG&M#%?u#SknEwKV6^#U0J}KbXKlVYNOv zSBarc+Na=BkWOmfat+*Ucfy^!X?lB;iq(!cz$}ccdx8{6Bk9-&xJF8|YGvB#u~!2r zWJ61K9!hP#MAtS>qQH41u%j3f2FJW4yP7M-Z8b#XSEeq1GgPIb{PmG9K6v)oFNnu4 zty3+Phc{o?oZ^cQo_=x%OuQKFlxeqd@l&lYjij4~>j;Y2H+FD8`|P}M=XW+dU6l(- zVf3QWT6=((_@xqWM&p$H8#ZKND(HXMe=P-H2c5YtQ%{hM&o7)ClOk&RR^bh_}a0=(2;XR)CH~TxFlB zx?}w4f$-MJwzQwS5nK7g;2)tA$>BNh5sUoT{&sR6k-~1%g7QZSLNZv|4>bi~Mjrs$ zahri^uaUV#*~c$}g~4my&XLFBw^o_5=;?2272l~};ooe79T=q3ca+mY`&1vXZV&6~ z9$F0$KF(FiCCB`|uwN4nZ$BDO*&~cFMo;njND}x?Bp?nS6_ruUTJ-#*gXf>TA6ZK2 ztS=Z_3VGsQE$0|}xH{R`w7Lb^X1eC#)`&IlI;udr$YZaI5I1?tH})5{N4uAqm`#)x zLLAO^Xkg@u;o~eHxE`LY%-W1{yLJA?taH_Ja8ax>rAWQ(^xZ;51;f6jg_RwUx)SOz7N=>k<_7jrdsBR)sWY@&ch?YA^B zajb=V?l)fgIa>SnV=ux%9~fRU()E?2Eeyn(&E#{EU|zmcFZU9o@sRUP69HiuP$0)+8&dp|Z#ggkmR!9Aq^XcK>)I%FWYl zSUd4rd!mG-L*=IT<3?j2Vb^%r5SuN0gmWUZfp*6+rIYvlMHVqf^gDdSbh*Cro)%Yk z8~#RmB)S&JOOXglThto!W>_q^Cf`=RyE0OV@{0&^zBihj7S-v0^G=MI+Db)=X^ho1 z!`#20@ld=$`T79vk$4q7-1!i_rM9Pvb#sZRidAESvaM4_TUxqQf+sQdJv2REx>h>M z92AtgM8N0vPCvE63u8fTt%(BbR0Lq|0?ou@bg-8ZFK^HyNE6~kW+^RVyDJB40U#3r z`)vJKy7p~I7<96x;SPYUX$-N3drtt)Xp#iMykN(YoD82l+Pe|KRICB6ntB=0=kB-Q zJJJq3+w+&l#fr9pM}6Y5cbws~`5rP*Q|H5y5QRr)9xH#t0SCdvs+3))B!guv!O-Os zzHX-m-lN)khMrLI4t(pF0AH%kHD4fk;Fh-skc4~!%DqwM808n3iX%yGr?VNLOY52U zM@p8R{tc%9a6L=Wfn+-XRJ>N=Si~#KUk_a`<3z_y$U0(Iz&=gFpu1Auy0MVuHf^pK zc=rX`Tu+}~L7VG^e(lw>NhoPOqiOm_5w)L*ls(d*EzqdtJ);^5GiQFKTt6P)NcRh2AS!(r-KT{$GWttRrXP1#yo z=rp~O*!>TmzWDf~zy0aopMCVvvnPky_jWxb9G=D0Q0vBSOqnRQCeAGFFT_Zja6hf` z*4}3rLiRc#Bm_-a$H0a(lb1Uuq5Y~s*)$g!NmYswSccJY|3 zpE1s9!uknJQnEXUN11ap;z}=jr5bOqo1vWcuDp1P3_M>;bmZ2nDWfAS%{tUc!~~Y8 z1(5iffq&fu;iEb3h0)BQbCRc`R_$HDBV7nik1OzBZ+`Gqr6<2(^APRbmPLISgR(vS z&w&9ej=x-&mU-|}4SDe1B z#i5_Rv%ec)qX`KTN~%X)!$!Qf&ZDy~*j3r)+B=6d+5L{d6UEhE4H2ybef+e~(;4_( zQVq;}44EOeP8k4TdP)+uWVNfJ^m2%LVtx2Sq(trEvdOej;wAa%FMs>fe|=r5Jm*`j zEyO$ANoKN3NuzI{(t1Mh_Wqxg!bQl8X$E>7L@UW^BIXPISzK0!o@gX(0D zx=chgTP>;B-{ytb_yEzwdGGtHETuS#A}Ns^+DpGNx-MSC?^Hl^bJ@t&*gBp5o0IZF zao^Mf4Cd1p&p#4)-1FOE;~t)Exoi^p_I1mYhd=E2%UJ<-Yv$l@{V1rbKgg7KDwLfA zhAC-z%m%IP1o>S`FD{Hn$ri}Q?5NX}U1TCeD^hw35}>;Hl-LfNl9~Fo-qJLIYSdX0L_8H6Y$HQV^@`a_P&t}&c*l3x$tosBGI z4#x9B?YL!sOV;wo+-~{upKId432DZ#&6|<~{YsH;9qkG?X^lKw+MdaF4F;bM$~Q$d z+yQ(+N)U9x6+k3t|7@%mH%NQ1pPPES3v&a`-EjbS(B!eFBBWrJjB-JqGT zioq6vMo8;j?pw}iM(gu?jrAiEqY!>-a{I$zLr<78>5&Na0oPl98DXnyN1tda*HlqW zYc7C{q@{5H9sxHJHo^2en?Wi_AhU4mV6SZ?TN|mmO#6zl1?Rm>>tPqINft`0%MLhf zStXgAw8qMjk3hB3?)Q8S=!e23IonuGihk6j95p*eE_z-bn*?+dBO~Xd|1=9)U#y_B z^UGT-?4C<^fiex+=_y*a2>x8~<3?hF1V~kiGBXYBUTvBNa5)XFJ^b&3AAeDaD&4Qn zRJKjMX!C=J$AI3jE?OV`&_?^3x6K@Ac+*wAO93Y(IXD=z!Gt!F1O@Vs5G=E(Q0ymU zNClzD7;+I6oEzk%RoQj+VKx*e12d6;n1orXCk)tKpEX4Rd_7gk)NW^9fFr6yVQ@mp zIfMxBxV(grZpVm@d}C|?_a@2RL138BY>)Ig9HZAv_r>fEFc^eha=Bgeg#$_{&mxrX z+NHEv)_E;(rZi4F=~c!9NfPkq2?M^Qm)hY2JKdup2`ka*A#Ebc`c8-~0|FKzbG;oO0NConB2}{OZSv4Rn z`GFIu_9nJ{Zg_X+=Ge>!YE;q>kWG5x|GTsYWTH z;;h+ohxqm|hbFqBVMTN{PL!;V`!xseByulWLp_tgEeF;KwkHr>{PdUomJ_Yd8!9ar zDk5fzlu5GHp;kHKZq2=lP|VZoAZ&Fx^bry58Xl)76dvf~xT-k^p&08|1o?pW<-=le z0bX+VmgBoIjfqaFxRqA)}h9)h(-`<}-KZv#T&d`SMCueeCNgL3) z@;}n#rK4=i+co0&1@d~NPvsl46r68hY6j-F)-h(#B@1zoqX*}U$I~oChOkX;gl|9@ z+Pw%Q{xCgZ#H_G7kXi;}aU8~lFeK?^cMF-3=Q zHag6bu$5JpIc7;p8yn0(A5V=Jef7HL*RTuEof=Mv?QP{~^=V`cPf+{Di7T!=Dw zn#H6jT#7)S>y!&`zcZzgESkd1cGI}Yy^q)@K5j{_XiO8}eUL9d!!5{wp78SOEX{{&*M;WR9G#{@Bt#^GkPS1%aLy28)5Undw=$D*)UlrkT;#=J<} zes`v{_Qrpbdt4#(*}+7_`7GNv8e-bzZV>XOS{4yI*nPO4KW7=%F&Ia!U=%~jlN{g~Fhc>3f4 z$Ih4ThVQnH0{cnfylPrEXG~)7UPC{bJH&9E%|8fe4bzz&{}xZY96VKAPU<)!y<{v| zRKD|0x#f!1xVWfk$-zEz(>NGobaG=d67FVXl}q!AY?T*it57whj@0UrubsYo&8XI! zm1wQ5w1Xb-*4b&z&v$lo#{mCUm_SjRDrwmM`}Ur;Tw!oF@o3G<3G~br7nI$<_He*D zq8gwYx!s-0Py*J0yPymxJ2w%eEn;4Q{H0b#|59RIN~gy?RtHa2b|f1=RE{{wzJK?i zr!3V>8mifpGO4D`OmD-N;7XN$vWoP>(DcSeuWpS58K2jA6+aNjY0@Oq-vlPuF^YpDG7$$tu$nWQ(%0N79D`tW~;p9(sWZZH~5~nGk0vY?7+4O-<{BYL9gHdkpEc z8Tm+s!#&xKc~yFD!kEHrGbqoG=cMzEkrA1?;Bq1fchWAlXXF?nP~l7&lGvu|I_gT3 za5Zp@2>Bu5_7QoAHnI0TUU)U(in|SCv$Fwsx!#=qnbL_k^EabA%EpnB-w?<&yb2Ig zOK;l7lf$@W(ofrUs&>D9?;XOqzWna=$9P6ixg$L$NDuds2Imxe;hwlqzlg)1-LPDe zz>McV%^mo7dIzo$+w7i4>aMF!Y243sB9q&DU86zzeVd2a!IfP>!|0)2+sb7?kM7DM zX|vty^Cj|EcWy0jk|XZZf=1$tkI{xs_`*dxquvV_5v9NFuRYjnwr^@1JLZX|Vnn$y z!8O?kEY+mX6fVBkD{HA{)*DUf1VOA&lZ1n=rDpAWz1A_)x&sb&kIYrvW#XcI2PawX zphO!jI=IFkJDg~Mjuj)F&ps>n3l=Xx-#E6vX)33ow+1Xv{~Z!xR31D?4pkVDaIhP# zXpI1+B5s=zvx!4Mu%0m`An~$5@8R7%u-}NdTTek?RlW7>W3s|Bnopu;%7Jxzjvz)S zUF0k&ex^zjDa_bm_A2FoY5+r)PMO3(pQUqOd%oH&?B`)i&!(a!W$%t;o=Ay;#ffAK zHwW1&dQzUTy+&2iJi5VtTxj00>MC}yd0qBtl<`ttr8PXKZ~axGKK2gywL}Vl-{-8P za?a4Vir9B@0yR3SZKM0L8;EqymrAl>?F9gFnIcF6z`XaufuVdmlh-yu1AN85F)rC^9+@*wh`Y?MUAa_#dYY`eCp;*FvFmL~`I{kC1 zpgZA(?T0=X+-BO-IA&c7nWsdYDgh~t5eg7OFBc7wi4=-xT6aUYfkZD3!I2CFa!g&w z?-{=YMKQN$^2$2Q+C{Nss_4)QgTO2cs#npQOaRiB&+tNGw? zHmy=Qv`HzksxpY~+E6m*OuGuUC0S`ojFO&Z*-FxvNr*@JxQS;DAQad5WGrmoE(n4= zDZf-su6LU*^@B$zCyl&QaxdkRl$t>bW~M_@{`fArryp7h+B>%VyDmBX7-mSkGXbjQS9=5#qUZ5ppf4X_iS-BN^bth6E= zJW1JtH2lN!qIZ>ts4lI|Pdk#HYZB&k>5=S~{fq<4q*}LoQ*w!Oiph_x95k+h&n7t4 zX#d@WB{-{ZyhO=fOCoo}!6wOxqc|Nb}SLVxA&fB*a6 zHpQo(Jb(J}@1K73=_kK<`uxR<&vb3|bH3pZ(NFpN@m;xetv^0|cK9(j+}94Py69%v zk!dtZvwti}_*9pY{bCpV^y7u5{oK))ZK|)xQk&&u4&mPU)jMqEo~s+$l}5yawZ7JQ zJb9;VK+$5)V0p;!NQk)&hpB+lTi;zPPZ@iIbHbj@f;LLV3MjEytja3;Wiu4{Q1u{O zdiIOI{psJIzIgu0lf&#+CVM@!h_)!OBE4Z$^729C9fe?oiN1Ya>VO!KXn5<-a2KJG zN%c6p-Acw7-rvl!e2L4FX{61{R87~||CK5%-$L{a8%;zmvA0and>0lIdxu>8?iU#S5N^F$nWIv)(9dC(RAvLIoH~`{(YS!WrJ@zUvsQF+E7@tHxm1%TFE!guzH}D`ENDqw*I?yctW^6D}ILW>VhS zBcgW@Y2m4{h zhE^Qm+6=Whzd?EV4F>z%r%%R5$)1WzIHA@5cq!Ny zK{GmRP@ThmK(#(EL=cOTEA-OVXw9V27~W=Vd~V-W3sI~psDlP4-`F*f685WdJdhHx zF>y4MtV1MZbQ9_-M0)zp4WoCQz8C5e5u~sY9Ew22Dn}CGXIz*fs&()3@Q^Nv7`q)X zN^R`n*<43eI2eZ54ChrQtkWvH@xRKpT%TnB(;l@|zMgr`Q|lrB81_IFPk%&~5)*{h zO7rqj2)3F=9PTJ*2Wv4dedyQvpuIcRA;?@oZkYQ+}}cKw%mJD*8Atj214 z`ZTzp;WY@Q%Hhp{*mt`N5CYf?aco4i{kggfR-s8K}lK=2;fBHX9GFQD~oZtrPn_7*NjjXJVmoOIS z6^Q*HutyDHWuLZ(_@Di2t!>B~vytEy-^nGy?N-Cu>0?C5 zy$}Tw8^Ek;%{ql~pW4isOp|L4s^buBGc(d&%; zcT?=Rh7?iP6$Q>?)8fqvtiU77syWIZc@|?Ar>LZYaSSflQl)_GekjVWgMN$;vv+V( zu8{DKPsrC!Hy6BTF?M_GOjQWXk-Ky#z1*Gqe5DieTsZ6JT{#4m`# zv^i?37x#pZ9bZ` zD95S>bD)&!(QbD|5t>?{X5RrwXjJK$irC=`4jDV{AXxa?2qCjDYh8)B*G32Sy1)JQ z+gbJxc~#jQ5i!=&7cV}s3wfA5d-37{#|AqrfW4w??EsTzlx`gWxcOKi5Sj$=?wxcK zk_6#IVS?L|EEn4(PO;Nrht6fY8|8&GHi*#406c)EBEMabNpd zM=7{&>yGvgJbd;SDt5 zI*eEABi730bNkA(^-b0>(X`_sanF02PN}}xm%wKC<+&L(tsxPfu8tsI8)epx4%x=H zM{K#vVJv%b9dQu9_Yzw>aBA~f;-_)3WDsK89TrIS~LI+jo_N^@7IT@+u; zQQ6Xuq9$Ke<$(@m+3dE>*J~O4_h`XFcsJDv15!MXHz*+zX2F(GIYU>M065d3XZ^!FzfjuxF*BZ1}dpsG0+Q1wL~%FXq&?`nTP z4h(=t)>)W#XqN;SZ3Prv3*U03lsUdD-4TJ?ftCn>psxL9E zBt}{ivPOO~JQcb}15SoJR=zvT zqK9xW?&3vc!HZP->i6Mbze>z0_;QSuyz?URory4AA+}A%wHrM0~egIAcgh>~PV z=5(`wa@JHi?tSN#H-eFtZCf6f_B}rgzUSXJ!)w8bEM>NgSyzBr2h-=Ym`bS{1n@U( zuyIX4zLG3yLF?`3V-dc(8WH@?z5Ti075}(6Nu%Oxfu69(ew5_)kLocaFIpSTmR)+l zY#F2!*6X@z92DRi&GSM#<@0G)Vg2`8$HjNxYj@&|1D96q>wN1$L^PDGVhqXSuU`+S z5WG(ll~ixL5*K>h2)!dtcxAYYhtvoXb9rORDOf}m+F7}nXf93a_r0f3nfc!nn0r_b zlU{F|<0a)AsW;g*_R^SM8`X>_PAZ*-k@zE~%fPqMNFrA(c-L z*3f|!5psE)Qzyhn zV8--SWu1v6f$MB7fd?y;5{w2`22F-H`{6kkDO(7cqTI^Sa3@sm zT5~ig(XX3?k9fzz)NedoSeeI2(kIgB#Ow+>#99aB(adJ*{Pe$$%K)>dI%Pi0^T$E} z@$@nRh)=IV0P$46_-dBZ-K?wJ9uP%*!u#>f8;o$s+^UY8a{GeAzmai!uSRqUQN-1L z+tmpr$iF)+9$h!ExiTZfdB6TT<&qoL^tL^AlSB8t$-XaEHh=8}zgnHXJr>jp$I{C+ zzy-ysTx?AzRca93fDxyF;C5-lN=V)d_Qpn@2bwE;l8Ki}G2yfa{l*Eq$tFs^ydg!6 zIWoBHs2zI8=r9#3@D=u=mvpXldv=Bw9s{N+N(hR#!4z6idfm*0)a3N~IweCQs$&4G z2wPr&HN#Pd5w>7-mKNpsiPoHQDsJBK%=izvqh7B;h8WKC2 z5*dClz!O^o%dvTZ!`E8BkYTkLPa~WoI0tW+0Z^+Cr){hG!XNPlFI4E?wzZqtgPdTl=Ou$bZ6M*oOp*?QIo@U;gD^Kv;eH zwy5M|Jb%(6Gd^YZvt zC`s$g``CSV`$l)C z61s5#H)U%>ymfy1e{I_2m_y{PzS@wjnwCdTr5SElYuoeiXZ(?zU2kwiOx{M=i2Wcu3e z(=%DKQOD6n{qc6G+rO8OzWuD@wQl_QaO2LAfpLDA{lg*d;J@ZalljNz&pH42^wZmo zKc+l-zs_A1Rrx@e!?ewM(@Uj+VlIkaa%6j3oU`*kp5>*Yil5K}s7$y3Pn-puF+k3R zXThmbFs2#7O@%fAn}^4lA^&7uf$n^dCV(ViOAU2 z)IiH4foLRf-KPtvYDRd3)`Wo&DI>e;$r};;RH{swPFmaihgImv0d-@V;zYt8b}jR@ zRH|Hw1MDn)H?6T(`fH724IYFtSe}XaZpt_I-vdc(lnor+O%6cHF#d29>q99;wM_L> z$dSx8eN!|FtL^Z463XS(5<%Tc2*}uBaOF`VVZ6$m^g5b_=|kUNNx%>ot|bIM%)UVq zM?UM2yC&N`NF3-U`_dB^it*d)Pq<2ZSl3DCQg>cZ;+-226jI+z)jaanb0jf|%9jxp zH|wPP_JjoQIttdIHpdMiFyfXt{LMc&*L5ranpuF1Yiy_7ve4x!YiMm~-$W12!!gXi z#$74V4J^Yc@r20Naig~mxEw*s_FiHV|GKS4pxw5>vgUXUMm%da<`6EbbOo%NEi+49 zzhy`!JcsZC9bwZ;=*qZ432#ChcN-;Ll)-k4zVRUY5AZjQy%gGYn_>cpeLL2#`&ulu zmd+fR`5}vEpWKpHG;JuxD(2FL=SF$D7x^dO&_fP7v>@8`?0=ABf5$XS0wU2S)cu$$CoVQP>DOZO*TwN72~PHf|7s zsht5Q_?~u}>^{8?k7oy;yBd_ytbf;O1l9!Hea+pKSY$1t{|k83$7_F_1$C#D-3UY;H~{_2@%4F*{fWz)>7^fF)t!c7|OIh zrX6vN#SnEJWA+8e5ksK;)Rb0Apvg*;agJ2&bbcV#c@3i7voIZ&=04bzOVxLkW!$D` zw5l%8(yLO%4*J2Xu|(~lz>LT!p)pMdZ4m)8ko(8H8ewJ*v}!3ixKIyb9ffTLcleSm zMwoMnm!km_t&sMS`8M^UuqC(Fa&mSgI)XaRXybRJvn3jtX6Nz%oxf! z*oiBI-bW&?!Do6M{tbP8)an1-Yl^DOTTJEIyZ^-ppMCT~J|}ubRW5q}0uJ!mx6I4- zix29ic1z_xc{1$4pQ<7``QSQ#W7br>h=-%7=v?K+?X+)i zcEFO-A#^-Ko2oI&I?8F$@<30`Y#ew&a1i;9M;!MFX=~n}nR7i+YI?q**2%RE+P~9` zcY+{hP#0yE;Xw%&HFgX* zKc{NiEEnyHS`;Ymcc%l2q^_W|m2_SP3rh{EZVx_guIVbXa#d9CuO6OTW*T==~#m zYki&Pmm{9u(;p+Ta%d^XghP}d=T3Du*fbj$p^Nu=VHri&x%nI zd0F6xNBlVBVF)ixxo`0E`L|448(wexxKzb~ag^*xqeT?h0ElT%^`bR}T!~|lRV|14 zbjoAYnGXRrtQz;q-J_ZAC->Vky!|5Xx6iJ^{iZ*>J@f77o*!_!eM%6_Zzw*(;yBQ0 zJ>&gOyL3ZV*;w}yDz~drwB?J1g0oC58YFdpJHEDuM?`zBD14N8C9DAbqrKv_wT-`N zx;%{oHC;Ej{1Rjm0{imxv0#R!{Mqar(yUTw8eGSFo;wgA_!;tkB}jcYc_6@So#o8A zn<-yY(Z1P`#wJiI5HBiym=G%}o4F~Otvp;A2)Xks9rjd^xKYv9bOlstr9}pjoB{a_ zY6rcHn1&7vhDssjzCoFNRo3%6fX%qy2E#9_35BX8fi|oTL1l)609gKZZiIwx-SFNk zno~7EW2&xFCUx!G-0xN`PX$kC}!y0v(pBv5kIjoaqW%n>#%xq$l^MW)_1nko+&??o& zQ-kzS!Z~p`VgGVD6@6K(YO$!oILQb`icEFSk}W^fhQ2bGc`;wgu6M5WtEO8AtCl7$ z`mXF^T!TsqwI}^*?evAXZq84t4x5|0l6CCjZjG~ycZmy5P|L zpY$V90FX)|dWGn~OOo?C;Ynm2U){unDH|dS(+zcvL`&WZ5v!2HMMYBXu=H##6g)4ras&!5X?i@VkGP+q?3)sO=dVzI85rA|NCGcB?>2o` zN=)LO>GUc0B}AIZ=F{HG_RDDK>Fq*vnyvla4@1*`zOZqJ{Q&ucjEXQH2AX=kjWY6u z;cszSx-}$Fo?!(50llobed-N)d`Dj(TfXz3L2^=%!MA!dk%soV+esXKV`75sS>d@K zH7?0BJ$vsVt?T&bb|!@ZFHlrFm@AHlVXcAG^g!<^pk!>sLXGlFDq-!LH34Gc)Ux4@ zle@)jQ<*9h#6>5g@B{(q_Xw-F7R-CkV7$psP>Aw>3;a-W$nc`J!J!C1aTafFIFLBV z16b{h(7iA(kD0M|?5JkpOCkygFF?>m&tsUn?7AW1n?iAm9we$_cw-gj<;YDb^4PEs zPLx|~fg!Q4sxvBBk|YWIK`2rr5vG@nQD$>D!JN;Z$>XpG|GT z6;Avfw9AuDxhdkG6K>YI0m3yzL_#ALwIEFA!$FNTW^OdRkq*Q$`^m5qws0l_o1gA9in~=N>$+6H~N=D1D?Jc zC!4uui>}r)3lHUxx0B>qz=QrdIWAgV0V)6cm=}BVE7T`v(}EhRiqXAmOERN$L{bQ^ z{jxQvUQCAj6KCN=-)v0O6H1ePM-*l3O|?d3l?Ze8w1B8j2xV7VOl9qPa2in9ON2K^ zL#GoJpV~A0rx%(J9XPFh6{|*gC@*3uOt^Yy@#;H|*|~kj8e1`TYl`P56s|Ah0DhUH zoMOtj&6Rz=wRsxe6wIZ*)b~{5SLGyqXFKlUn#W7G;n!PeZIe}f9jw3{4X#(o*l~`g zv-Ee^mR*XZwFt*bWfqf0f7Zd0!tUoTfZ zpC6YsG6e33SQlH%QuaqeI7kMF+7Y_VT|2!`z5(hhzBbu=<6`Ti7*B68sl%%VCclve zq8(?VyhUQG7sd@9$=~Z{t}N6xrdXT!S8pR`izl6Y-T3~RqSu9cGoZR7T!%FT&K&Un z-5=dcKh}Af?vKGzeEcjvHrGysZv0JH*Z*;Em-mK#cF!TRDnNm7P=gmV0m`hj zhX|scI2gZYzo@|eFx1*Ac7c>Qm@q#z(c3I_5P%1Fg2I?&C^Cf04tC4{%$i+@-;xEF z9(ttHV(StzPHD!|ZC>Hmf+XW^eudS@)GHA(88yABmtbyM2f2KsCH&NDK;+P`G1+27v>lG4!JcuSYwvp&?@#Q{bvJjg1@7ruKE8lm?M=SBVw3SN)m z*4~KQfMAT%cPlCUo&nATTht7_sk}%LZW9Jgk?*ma^5R<7B8}$94 z;SQtIl(e0i!B?SBp02M6cV~Y;bUIG|8&>ya>RxzS1Y3akm)VEXet43+{hu20CGo4f zWo0f+Z2FOEG02az%OxH z0|w)$J$;MSO*wOP$&kW6xd5*=zK}pW7I$H>K>6AzdOR| zJSqMr-}T7k`{3w|AYHOMjhTE7gsp%wl6<_gS!5bR_bMt!0%z39gr0Q|c&#;eMF|n= zZ2*8|E9C3+E;kczbqwM6`!qm!?<=nyIe7XPlgMk|Zo)e(?Rq z)Xg6gvGFFms&6W@>+tr@ujzXO(w8)4fP|Oz6`GW(G?4Yc+f0ycLK(~=6%;VRla7l_ zYq@z^1g;*s0CWQ8o`BvyK=l~OzCvJYpkVOkWJ?%e!t*iprBYQMYYD{7B|fqpG!I@x z#~f|c*R+rGO4&Q*s7h03+iC3|#dWGecZ9Cn{dGR;Bs+DnjkZi$q0UTt!qw zl~S&F%iT@B%56njq|zfEsgJB_TeS!X-<1da9HgYYOp!u&hA+;HtKKMC+-3M)n zZr1d&KV{ovH#x??!}!>s;`IxVcCE}|_SL2()k&P8V)oLDQOpRLbIxX)=Hf{BY10~e z)Hmz{2TWs^eONUnt8)TeD;|7cqI-qj&LUYw0?^E{;cRBsx*t-NPsk3MZ~4KJQp+!u zO8&{#Um99tf@RRKRlq9_3~axYBDkgl%PY@-&C0FmBgNd%E_G08bJmv%9gjomXS^2Hk!O* zZfp<_ba}R=6&YDD$s43uR@hIK{&&=3vn%mGb8B2ynRcCK*{_=R$YvuM8#c4-A56tR zU9W@w`ycbV&R3Z<3XpTi9NY}~SeFBWOga0RwCp1G3(ETWTzfR&6QQwiH+VpDk71;i zNMA1C?#duQ;>)dZIj6hdj1?&z-76{;v^6(=*Eus-0XJ*HB_N7EHg-gZq2zhX_N z<4K`xNMfc^`>lDu>y#TLdd$SOGKt#Y9Wsejf2F!s>ry4v2^=c?gVk-xkp-q|vx=cY zSTZklvTwv{XtOD6IitjDkY0~7R7jvisH+QmTzL6hI+Dt!-2E0$h{cPj*=%BHjmbO8 zYQs3)RVgA3*++Q?Qt6?}KB+FGxz}q^{1V9B*#;;Tqp5uqM2J?ojg*y$l2l0u8riqC zt|x%Ty3s~ToJeZzrmRojcAl>(T_(w%@xj_IRG*G9{qAj4T5N6UJ@AlA0V(AUJKOM$ zONl%8&Vhb7>k0|)Joy6oiOzA|4rCSMsDz0xrtL6L>k(*PZpMx-46prc&CG|BcA`nf!e|8J8L8zFm!GOrEYD48r>V0{{U3|LlEBZyec` z=3fc)N*n~)R;fxVsW1ZERd#m)vR!ahHwH5p6oQeFdBzPjQjw~iOmjN6QlDevQ2&#!u-N0>kA_<`fn)aR9DbSH*Q$tD+iT1fcAOrihB{jf9`o z6hph%Y=*F@T+QW<%0?#>;inoQR z!&|_N`pz;9-WnN4Qpp5bsX`leB{Wk8ir}Z0?vEW3eWCL`>o%c9cpl;#P2(v#|>Q51NsqaIzOl3D+L$=KUc$gg}AyW-u{ z31IvJe20tfL@tPYVBp!uuJ82M#pA4YugP{eoFoVn65~o2^G^+uYwI?lzfGwzN}#M0 zGPR395&2v&Z+X7>>z?tZ)ry7`71i9>t|Wr2Qoqd$bJ9rvh3#hDe=SKB)9v$8pGQ-l zHpGd$i4YqfF4NW3&}FOnGJZGpDWho(7i z$#i{iNu>Q`uaR~q)AiFUn697Pe-ozbr}Brl{`!TB`QYfm(S6*7U-ArH=gt;zUq7n8 z0)%$a)|lode!P8mJ-WsJ20nHQWQKGI(J!lU5XB&NYNS{}!$WPcX-Ve_OV2o7pJF2U zd>qVzuTadWsgFg{Y`#y{k6Sk28Pyk3jCOJF{=)~K{Pl-F-GBJ#(Lt8b(bx63=9C$j zKEZE@!unD1ZSZ{Tc$CYccDqDe7>YkMhd!or6Vm&rGVIMIx4kWdt=bm%gh+PU{Gs@V z{`eTuzb?g;@e<8{0%14#>EF6!$~M&)|GYSXa9&N`?A~7rvi)3G#6_V^Uea4JxNQ+R zmAwtm;+=&#Jk8W!)PZUm*`DXvCa@RcVI37>Rg8Czdd}iyDWobCSld5-{(5to9zhfy z4N9aY@Nm@|Oh2{1@ylHtXe+%+!UsvGZ{VIFx4g*!owUaAQAV1MS0_WYV#aqg*LHhZac*}kOlDy=GSJ{24vm{a(?hS5gd^lm>|xZ3zu6t+ z-46B~?Jw~e<<#@CIm#@5e%IID>dbxJDn-0Hk>o&{P)M%2nz?!7KzG;LzN}C6URJ2P zw5&wwBX)+&k_SzK^c$SqwyzgWO@*bq07jb_6km4Eu6!>){hLnS2v5t{R??iN7!~PG z>yOkz!y7EQN4*|MnodpXm{h1SkO+q=tipf7rB8@+f~pON6o2FBryqa%_u}69A2+A` zr2hVwhreuH1gr-10l)tG>$3P}=+{TZqq0~Z-T(B#!O^wX@k5P(d+jjn1>b#9cfqpt zJEOEHwQ|XgVZ5h0GD)MR#IEC=%m01;x@!g`ajc4B#EA@!4fM*D%i*cygLxdkwA;ay z;i(Dq)D(&cj!dKDlW^~JTvej%?B8-I$`z5-I9{uwl$LChFrLk!OOEorH-P!iiRIu zPdYgw1eGn{1)5R;mUA<_o|XzsCf-7zGN8nS1+ga{3_Opq-m3}V#|_5bVt9pRA{AuB zTleQQ04Y5kv8C<-T`QT{G8mxAEtjVmuH}h4h-XdPucZY;_qWR^j<1t>&VYlb z#(F0v+`jtFvk(;MpOZ%lWELo95}=QA$zGI#7wG)E2xK{N6xx6gBvaClC}?Gj^Df<; zImlD9rQ$WYm-7r%E?#ZS%=EaY2e=S0yrw?x$qId}t_Nan*Ny4wa`yzoR>-*q_^b0T z!tT9)Q0lTkEMR3iNH4shfKj$9RxkQR-_hBvg|G{^I-4FDir z0Y3B;WtGDbbv+l%IgY2SqD&@auP9%<%W-JaekI9G#yIxfP+^GfTkLu2#Orm;=KGjC z2YY$*IG6tqJq<9-Mxu2x9^i8nUx&J>JR&tJFA8Lip9zy9zq2S){Ui{C2# zPog^I5AH2~ciL!J{{{h~zNF)srcG`et&fWT@=srv#ZUkG;NWA+M4o=9ntIw8jACCC zCYJH-6tX;=jcTOZRVD~6|DMYKxqW>8f6p3r=5b$JQL%R9FGE9cY!|cX_Y8v+5Pw_u zgPTUB>d=kc@IG&njCLUOFdt28mX_Lzcu%eXTG59AM!cRPsVw>?5(=u;pwh&TMhCDB z5?4SO(MdQngWKwyz*5W^&KTjPZRMO5sQh({Ki=i3L*0WLskYo0E;-kbL_ej^UTQE! z{OAalTr*xHfb{W{s1A^tol2I{En|Bf$I*9RIqlySU;oqWMVQ-7=dU`|*wlWrRp6-- z5a@WUN9OyXl246Du!Bdr$w1t6*U8##&8j0JogkAW6Y%|Jt37+b!dWB?OhP+BtLSk7 zX=V6}sg@ z9QPB-A{Wt#qebN~f2Ac(na_wkPluOr!NgtS#8Ei1A-Y)(Uc}nF`bP{4Wqny-;JhfEt5VgSH@AngwZVpKlDp6~<~|w;IA3UyG=4B}DA3Kipmp3R z_m`{&y`>aS@;V&n7%IaW6_lc@6G4naZn3U*Y;lcVsTMH9Q44Zi>D5W^5VCzN?UQ3+ z(V*MJ%c%=T7n!>_SDZ8G9&6m7U&ztG}eus|_p zuS>_NBBrn>&#$NoGYYn5V_O$~mfhp6ro6;ITEH>9ZdjeZrk zWh`(+KFF5VSXd@5e$X(W2|`QgSuM8ojKM&LP4ajqLvjMrio1&9YI2UHUe{g%DN8U8 zatNL$osOa8yzDjh&@2{yZNeAoPuv@{GVYnc2cyO#s?jV}{88~s-i6y+FWbF@ejf{V zOa4dp;K&!3Hl7t(nQhN+=RpxQ=0sD5>7~wSJnt&<7)L7JijF^2W|l5}_mQz%G{eVsfjm`hJQ_>= ze(Vj$dc-V_28N0l)j4ZNr5aw?OE1wD(oxTP&%ynzSkq639%tzCglXox=b~)g+b8a+ zg$yHtM1VUHk7jto1f7@K2Jt8px{CCmHv%vqkvvynY_=NEUlfXY7x7Be!+>XZ{ zH%a`JJO6`6ndj}EcoKOyv3#ZIPodFP>?fnyLNc6;M44Rn=l+^m8eD>eI;$4dny*Cn z?E72!=y&9wH@*jU8*9zJ3AEZ~EiJU0tUh{?1!}9|gy#;}AJA-Ci5)Usp#mB>Jpb`< zVN}AnA5N-{)Be=MB=!gXSlU(d@l&V?XHwNa!#+D%NzGfVd*X zswZLSlCkRAGXdr)nC=q=4w6A1X|D<@z{^)fe&Ipj1iSczhNeR&0G_VjNI=vPm$)xz zXTn{bbbv`YbF~&(dlw8nGmQXmoaz!KukV2N;Lc9m66VegH=&W0FfN9Eq$TJ<#myh- z8ZCg(j|A8eK>vRDwws3b0LbtDvgnwdU#vgSlhDL^$G2$9< zM_&UoZm~MHG+jZ*10r)9cktj~NEj`l3`qw+6k;|uW`fhFdrA~xxeFr4G7gDnhNV{3 zj*Xgr=$bJrrfpt?A;em8Q>q1{`ZK`|a z8j)4w;i75XI{L{0k|zk&=HvzkOO>V&M_K%-Kz+-c|B^S4^gquAn4xpZ zr0+?~A;b*2CGf_p1=I&`dG?bjr};(aLf&eXlPB-{4{*rcBB$)riQ>{&K#7~|py``R zZxvYTk_{jK!#`b`_nwF*ZAVNrx20W#J?T^fSUT)n_bk$k zOLP&Ua0@g>J)FPVXzD~ETAXpU&Q}$~%klv2fgt(9i!7u`EXP!BcIzg*P;_~fpv4+@ z*39w9|I!9Zm{d}2&_+JHABHCUXY}irX~I8v6HWNfSi!y^q zld~FuMOj{vIjYoFDox9B6RFmKtH8Aa!{d@HH|Ap$71jOjB$mam`+q#)hw&DDYAszd}D|ei!0P1iH*5g_*gY22UdzcfpdVZNA(oflHm%#@fA}A6N96cy2aIrK#c)fu zX`CV;;|-!hO;Yn770=u)cY$jcw_!<)a3p}|nKJA`Q!VCImn@bb$OyKSX-wPVj1w4w z?z?8Fg>+{I7c3g~aPAk)&}nbR1JY>-SdCm8?K^az7=d$`4j-r=;-&!D;z44UT=pcE zQ)$tRq=E*uz*d>fvZuRT_OzF`Gv9rQpt{-Xd; zBDeB5vE7}{PN7kBAQWO!kAvGMba0OQaX4vuW8pVH8u1N4MgFnf*BAJ0#5!38yQ$BT}U;V9z}+ z)a5%V%K1ySc4u911Zz?(5RxGWPSyE)!)oGLb8(`=jQkp0erh~uT;7WQHOV|#PcRL+ zisjA}OEhlGCeAfhLZaQB*?@VU3=`w!x{F`5qt1UQ!0)XVY{@BoS*TO4;GM(Ij8$ug z=9C5=DuG8`!hQh6T$w~(t1{cg3qE{R>t(n!Hlx@Ta(9;`vqA3*YI89nA=}4S_*|rm zq401SOi-gOQ!X353p52(!7v$?Wh~`Tszz@rf5e8%2W73xq@@wq-`8hLdC^n z@B%MsNnLy($93bgmnig8kD}X1tB22GQwkStBidJmeQDiupje@%3>42@M5)0`C(QxF zspy%h6i6iHFUMG#^78sT(?m{C(UButQ@S&rF4MIe@h-h?W(O;wx2IP@-$*-?kx_z{K% zCI@dw>XK*_`G88cJJGFfMKU~UtM1JL>*~YYY69rhE_PmC^+=_U)tShAU;JTUgzFFd&X`6 zLxWbSN989_0rwJv4g{Iq=w5XZ{~Ux>u-nY>$OWhuxkwM%8|dR@ll{sdqj*y~fHDTn z*4?-cx$K=AwqfG32!QX9FM9{#MTlLLjzX;+{s=DeahB%!S82*ar;J=BV4_0Xy5aO@ z=4S9+0^m&nS(3^Rw5O^jJn>d{jfQS#LueGCG=M7*XVLh&sNkZ6p)o%;!ftBs4awlI z`}QTq4>S-Vu{8>lyd6W_M*;5Xv3ZU&_3h|dk9?0JWr|W6u~G+ce~+b{0|L;WEgR~C z9de)TD7{R^{rDSIP4Spv9~ie`kP*D?RvDikF7qX|tuAyjoPB1*e@Xp^ylsU0n@TvN zC8R}$LOcKXMCxoaRiug_xk=adE-D2Xzc?fTVM*>p!-=rpDd%^``INCoG0-(0?{E)% zaId`X-A5!D308SB6n|3Ipmt_pht8Q+0sRe z^M55ciZ>Jx$q~l1M03825G{ODx>tNjl&Q)}+&3rW!^b-?5xB%%xcAD6apx7QxukEs z?pd^K4>Up0lJt8jH_cKI$cnVhS2HxYZ9E7+&5zVENSNA(@Z-aKSv^hx|f=B@xQ6u zX?^anLw;0~y;3`tL*w0pz2s@|#lq`hR)xkW{XjrhzoOM5vC}S$4`O|v>DXs+nbbnS zL-OLWW<=a|M0&5-;~=Ytxe$|7JL5_^x7bVb!hJ*6zLZ~O{Sf-pP}Mve(Y_)=YO~^z zuOSOXfX`Y__qfjHpMj-xTCFZq>zpya!J0Jq#)LrPIUz)&rCW${PipYWc%$-EdtD*_ zD9K&nr6_sjT()X$Hty=pvT|OVi8~UmT&Lq-3OF-SW)it+k&t(b)4L>M?X878_hw2~ z&^ZzvJWdg8G;_PF%y?i#R3RmEu7jFvkpelHT$?uDV})&rAhFJuT~ix=DYV7Li@*pt zGv>?}Uqo@HC6{0KuHYk&GET#7M8ANNb&}rY=1!WPMw>Gp_tYwi;3e6Yp_bV4K zb-#V$DGYSmv4w4@J=vj`Tn3Cvaa@&PUX(Vv%fgz&RC9ABGyFICFi#<)dj6X37#cIj z`kAC2ho{)Vu2b4ZHL0u#CeD5Q@oWMc+gFtMuIk*InUF!SFR|?spWX|Bz zh|THwYnsgQz)_;N8r9QPKlEzi>&Nm6K_Qtw(k)ay6unsS7G1({LeIMq+lMVwOW5ZH zya=EqMf0b=hC2`bAvl>!x8@$AKVM~Txi&&rT&+dhfiH&k*zm--3>_C7mYdS!udke~`u&s-0_$x|MgsU{}SU$0hE zZ-i9m60{EvLJ_H9muOl@{cm$9oF~APx2hp^9GFCF)TN^)Loi*c$cZnd} zWbfA^$(pu?82MTk0MR!qLnsQl>LcB=h%`G@K2$U%mgfsLRjM%}@Z$a{CL{iNQ2%U@ z6$GijP3ncaQI3pqrY;+8bJ2taDGUv4Fp`PEks0%vNb4|WT<1B?89%4@CKF}1j8eE| z<^WefsJ|ITav$yoO>zm%fvVx2o-xH+)1>*J5r$C^g8? zKjGplDnFxusa~e&zfc{;3_h{^Qyp@k^Km7QFXH+h4h?ayRn!qSQFF|&Hl6rBGEyK? zmkpZu8!cP_v$%`itY2(LsKnoFl6Z5~L2l+|Gy$hu6A37`w`VF^4%bZrhL*{9>Za^U z0cd`O97bda^gA^vE8`nuXWV5+ujlFE>+4jBGfRb0@TiRomzV=h_4K*RFhEBopDFy8 zu_ROC*5^t!WH`GOl6E$BTyDeYta8FUWv^v?$Ir3D+{nfg?Z|;(vuTtS z>XvFv;A!hM)i7*~z%;I_mfXkeDs^VM{VNl3h{gzI*gK z?#H_ILqHc8g-I4~u!<|Z;HFrdRfD+$-0tm0U6P(}w$$%tv157tzby~+TT(!eE>azy z+yrh)z&VFY7H(#sqA1EV5T#h#mvuH*UXN>Hw2+53MJ9KXn!FlWa*$@vHQw-sklh~g zv~NvTb;l+yZ|mORa)M}>y_``TM!3qQ$-_^LdaUsrvw5)=RRxQ>HVmRIU_S&=3=bcG z4k~woI%&gH9Si|^5Xdg1!yxlX}^+3>jkr4R2P!!*Sq~!MFEIiw9!jtZRKD8<9^;hZGWB9Z2EX z;*2_9&~x%wI+_#c4CFATDhoUgiofTs+h9!$FpD=223J-Z)%+kH7P8^2-XAD@dsI_H1zSW(% zJSpoN~25;ePMY!<`=(YYu`2 zh%HDjHTKMsz1@qnTD(PDunc7oPJhD6dk5~43#k5xJd5_Op=E^|Zx7Qs;z(~>4B$yD zD@1M*XX6}9#?lcMehc0G3;JTf*yM!=vwK*UCvpL5M?2XhUj#)dK{1NNeFZuJ;{l@r zxNBM)b8ra{G4WK6=$pRZ>mHv1iyN;kD(WWWliU+H;-ecYJ;fFjfC_8|kbSCdRc!d8 zMxq~@10WT9dndVH{Bd2PZ-89sl{Y4eA)zZFosB%#3b~uHj3#4fBM(`np{JF`H7Vw^ z_U@*mr@ZPyR~tFZn|&Zb?}wABV-F#b_Go6e2vgKRjLfj&^tziL5Zi!@wgj*S!Cpd$ zSBZSj1%|O7TM<WLD{&Coa(fNo@nkC6`WbzG+6ICX3vlUs1memGD!#dy>6;~|IkeNfaWz7H zmP~ou9y{;QmaT-M=2MnW{bc_*kZ4A82^~Ds&A0bYo4Tb(N?22U#}DN5dQmLZl7@Vq z=LQL8Eao!P6hfxjY2%~a!==xuBJO=|gQ;kNZ$B&XDy{pzV24xI>J+`t52`W1+IX?} zS|gJqMg$W7#I2faR{T2%i1M~}smFCQ3h}Cca7jk-$zC&xF1w(_Wk{zefH_Y`=394{74pEUgsBhBl0SL zn?9~9AHstp_dn!^-%-XW{HD^I@<~o9>McM0cVy%iID_a60BC?O?1d}eb!YE zR5P2g`D?C{pzgPK#P(f_{Q3ISw7u=!|248>y$85`Gf>d%pefS-T%W$Q*!j6LWo=!% zv%_YpIAAJ%?spJhjVy%y6&ZxJ{ovM1PPJfKb|f4$^XVYaj*(3l;UoKDLHW@jbZQqD zsOQkR3SS=t{j%jNydPK}BDAy9wxk*=>k*J(KqOV91A|-E4HWkx{)b#dohXBxzdkd* z=NT(dxI_uO1XD5uR`*xQ5}JEGUB7ehvN`{ACa^DcT(C6Pp(o8Cd_Vl|^!ye7d3bit zj&i%GkPx$#!}A{x7fkxe__1YIv(1?(vH9UM{KsT^z#55_CCBtT7Qvo21HxLyr~eGl zPEHhna;^$R&f+$30q)o+`XS5lciG@)pC7Qh<_#@`54bJ}x8q8jq+p=yfdE|RHmdLA zXRi6y2pRLkPYr9YLCA|`~>8Y6ut^smj`mzT%*Dkk-vCWzj({zt0_#0JU%+1_5e|@NrxS3hS=%NS3 z@=1^Zl+qBOr%ffw?FY1l@~(p}L7oMmuGH9)xthz1&Wu%yANo3YAELOzRWqyg@_w-g zYK^QL2*@h_JrUFFb(d2m&rlo@V$+gr>d2OHq4!sl?8q4w`z|M?CSa!1z#6Z==VW%w zL?+qm=ZlHAQ4^vf0n}EDJd&QZwmON0tfj4&2pNJ#jIys1BPb!_)|6=Q4yD3E7{FT= zt`pqZSnNT{^e*GVuKLZO%4(59v%C1?)0=n^7HotQ+@;W3n#w#*ECxuLO#~ssZ4KnU z`=dN|R?Ed{Q!!)25?9EIXSG$EOHU=QK+ZOd0MIBxMA6yJ^MS7i6Pf8#SL|a7RmXml zEu{w|j@q$LZgO+Sjt6BSa!@3JlDXT(v>hdAP;Boac+9u^I;4yCl*iPfeVXYB(A$YJP*>B`HQ&D? z9`9DmJ*Czhqa(`-()%W#1Y2*{u43|R@Vp<5e*fkZg&By_*TILq-LhSd_F$ow zyF7mnTSrmRs?E-rFo=HQJHICodBeV{G<&$dhv6I}h)Aj7A~3;Ofx(l4rnfvkiZ9JkI4(j)yOHJdZG_2)C(q&pyK5RD z_I9#75p{$6=qvBja}#Uj2fR^M8ntFJC1L68S{KYERf<6GdXnjJU+8$~aMp-AI05Ht z88F|BWgZO{B8F?86$2B|Vs}F)S}hsK-D3=$JAo6FV$ltYZE#Jb-Ap4+7*>f$sV}9v zyvBSktOY}hRPQv)J-{e~LMu0-*Rm0XY9iWbRCY(XirsSpFeGb)&y0NDo{UCd6zyUT z&2pr*U~rBYefHeBV8k5^f9`z+ub=ZjZmLZwA&lmUB){Jr6kmuLvAn2@i#pY0Nw^J3 zO#r)O9n+gm{Syv1ZLtFPWn*1AOEV`V&tJPG7(I@X2SzM&0D3?r9)j@}+|tsRI-=2Vbfa?I3`JENHt{l4 z&5H);bO2xdzugBOdb7cIf`KBkbJ!WRE+|twlm1HLjHTpY-OT_!#+nyrOatb3uSamA z1mcy&r7NejP+jV}8m(e5F-%4j2w%{oN&UO&=~QrhQfD1|RM1ce)4jMLlXqvwHG?@p zXS0-2cUOwsy?c8gFa!t*DE4Io!rnGD5fX)@RpH*b+zc^cMjiyTGP;g7RGv&NToV*M zr5#s~fJC=ZrPHw07|f$ ze(;gV^Vw;OgLB)&+?gmD-X7g?wCV@Ck@>s*#*53Ln2PYZdcS783&lq*{TL+K%wmf( zclyfwef0^JC$5)cERWBMyxUb0)o)+`9PN`lyBnD-+@P}-2fmY$)d~hjFM&{4iTy~r zN=WD`?l1vpO$Ibu8;B8g6EI)t&o+Kcz!;I*Mc%1r*T1aBn_y9JQ4;r$QqkuQj(5my zgN_(yoKe)hmQUMEU2jk8UF=YX@IQgVjVdx^Zv3AvY0foM%epMW<7JkL;8XmH0Hh;h z{SWffNAzVII2lT44*Ie2V0w1=z}@I95*wbh>N^yW65EN;wCKk~Fr{)&>7{Mbz)y|X zH{M0>D)%AanaYw5S~d_x%&5@r{qqX9KQqe;<1RQU8$BWdARzU4%*y=ZMT(^_)wrPa zvS?W%EZWYb6QUPV+-Dx(heOri5cTW{A?`6!c}E?j58Zc+lp)!o9#lg9H{W6T+@+3+ zujtfe{PbUq>{Ye!mJOCJ~Bd)iHXf<{)-=NRBN&A0GLn#p`3PnrW~di4c_Cdm``C-tvb{zF}S1 zsn$fQuey;tf|dV1$*w9Ho=gD@d4(JcV(w*EpStjD7*{x9+-f$C7A0%6`lnNF0iof4 zUi|fkf8KZFqekVOuju>h5C0R|Xfl{&ozw}t^9_=UwyzgWZI}p59sV~=0pd^p)4%=n z<3D!A^n74Z+*fb~K|l^RCcT=dFaEH=}J{=8RoiZPWyqIyUpYkT;x;jUblmJ9wmAZ^5p@8 zi0F(=mjH9&QCEUHaQa7tll^}v%nWqcjNne(!WalrMD7SxIK}RCGz0pH_?Y*Oj*bp~ z`thfKFYdinjGjC4rt$Rrk4iN8`FLz-end(f#eXA`;eU6L=BRjZ|KKhY4wv0w0VzG9cv`%Cm(%UG4(o$%T+`M@J86y^y3@7dW(Abr@%juCQ z-p9}z+l+Ge_-RTa)QbzjC4rrPqw%*h<{8}3h&u$+20;*)%~J?ZM0M zLTI3XLL@V9cVm=jXSFGeOGl$TC(liKA@pr0VarR8wNov zjAV-NX*2$f=dTPSEr`Pqjq;Q=zb4N#OX(pNqW+IRadm}Vw!lO_`?Am}berboT3hO! z>eK8IiF4P9^4>SG%?-xz{nE4z4VObj;jJ;aX|?jK+DHyL9rU8Y%hs8ah)8Wr)*_lR zej86TmeR?6qSIVZaKK61i9O2{L(;i-P%?O06TD~1u|oE@2UKw@ zX#z|Fl#1vh9lGRIdqQ}}(-pT;6;*ZUKWB9^n7VHPsiLT607;I0MuDeFYRokmz^`4l z+aCruI;8pDVzgSX2^f`mgcqT>l9if-joF)l3Jp!sSc#&lqzF+W9kU$WqxC)$=>?$) znLK<9o>^)Bv|s5%_dqJb434C6Y3U*0j_S!2NBIBj*LZB3FhB`bSQui_)35vhC14IG zgL5x+={6vH!P9)3VT#dW^P`YDu;gxvm?_1WHuO6IVsrsy4IvSkvqKCI=r}WMMu9cr zEmy5lf!t1ax6&D%@Q*A#dHN+;`=apa+VfZL2@rVz9aR?r0H$1E#Xd;uqod;Iqtq$a z)T?{f#3||-kJdX4wxP?>Hr%xooDWk9T#V! z69Pda@kwRZ4CUv+fhj`5iTQAuSPw@Kf+%CapK(#NV+q1U0G7}`3pS^_Q9H-}jKLxc0@t3X7)lxOVXnG4l zVpV-?ss9DSy;oc8`OD3Z3Zwi=oo+=%fCqufk|Z$H=qdC_D`1O8zsN46;dQQoubV@h zfiqFQM-ugg9U9U>N@5TFaY|vAZUc)80W7WtW~)*9vo!KA-*+7ttM?(*W!xR`!uji# z43eWUFR+<>ek3WrPgSugxm9N#U$3nAYsCuGAjQPA`|CbEz$4=qNk?D=s z5D7EbwduD~k6j2r9ez3x)1@R#bP9HnDbvPLVuexIaagzg z>KOMqD|zbcX57KtqdN>OygXqq>n9AC?+5qcViDF{8IdpS0b$~f9LKV1^u1KpJ{t-X z%{kSj_9oQ%t6gkbM&!KkNYhL=-R%y{*}^T{rK!X?B+d@0HBzq~9rMAQjLqmJzDYpV zoDj6LHhljtppvn?nK*K^=fCP6)vm9-RbTAunX?Mu4lDo*X5($YB7Cl>JzBR6r2m02 zx(P5r7Z+Zx0_BYbIwdryroSuYn{`rS0jBZ$kqORwE;4s7-%}YELEm7rt03G&Pt3$1@V~{rVU=k*}a*cDz0RCf?UM1!Dw!IyE^A=toid9`U z)k!bIi&PA#)Ja&$kRPB-0x_wBz!dZbtK(*%?u`W=44I&pa53gLf&Sq$y z^HCCPZSqmOX50vZa(46XyOb`Hgr+P_{Ll0*kA|oDp{Nqrb8K>INx5eNriq0ojjJ%0 zmp7&Ml(C4kU4Zn7Gizu)1w9!?yhY}6*Ep>6COe_U$3kjyH8MpQ7OujtqBlDkkgy6% ziOalY6Cn4Wgab5}BM9cbT`wyS=G$n`_B@%@oBfzqekqt6B?rex45u{!LXkGS~r({4!R8Py5*@6UurZu zA3IaC@+rgtfk&r*!vS-PUU^y#E6Plg8JOHVC|tAM993QS!-7~!!F^M-BT4FbcFi5} z&cYgQxv%Tg?Uv`Zw{DK~P@ zf(&Q2QJI>mxo>WxHKE``zmVFD;s4911SVhYqtWF@wPM%Qs?++G#@u|y(eYy#Ro?jVjUmr z5`U)3yL(a0lkYC<8K!BzmnC%Z_h{?PIXzVQw!u4Tu%lVzM@a|o6m|^i8xngzC!-dU ziHcfI(bTW$0>%^tjZZSzbAJD`x3}0LihSi@Gp8K%+r1xk-lhC&qH@5cjS!_1r2x+^ z+6Fzj%Y95$XOiGbsFPGai7i=>0hAx}si{`ShFd|`>UHl2>nntVkj(6w3*W8`|%?%n%D83F2u^wX9i}kQK;ps*5kfMvmrbUjc;p#TExfr8du0sv~Gi z+*m|CDz-tPjCZT*`uvs6k{!g=_wCwbiRr+e`w!1$x@_XC%kn}ucm-b@yYLT<%Otv!2bYwKpUhY;ZWn>aegC^v zHT>>d`eFA=X5n7_5&gO=8r*~b{`=oHOL>>yfB*e=ef`;|pMUb``};rp?9+$$KY#rA zku0IS&M)vrGQUHo{V9vnS5`V{=YZ@e)btQGY?**os1AD>+EEU#wip%oaxkor7 z67k;#J^S0W{{B^cRngec z&g4En;Rl*1M=EO6M7+$N|ac8Q_sT( zJZ7j89Ow3(G(j~{HLGBWaw3YHIPaRlJpmL{w;u~IPa<*k?G|vY5S5@^SGAdOtv>I} zGHp`EKqDdtunr#D)BT|SBaYy(VxfI6qKr+tyAv2)Fm+}nHz+}H%2mp( zA>xywG$IBU@n_x0Opfw8O5NFpJuCfjMR&xRxe5XMexm&G^xgp9`+k19<=`&QYzo!5 zY1cg)wzKgJ*s>({T}EGPt1kK{>m$adfr2^hASUiIwslLIbja8g+AaB(I}w}e#GN#h zSeQF?8cd* zr8@M;zd1=-`1zaq(FeFi8DQ?Ft1GS~Qz>g3!G5Fri8JYp`*&#CeIcUn2sg2jq|Dlr zi-_+}cLX;^EV7Avi7g=3W0m?G+4_{n!gMjR5Efp5F7mkXKzr4F?bJ}`k{Zpl8OOEQ z$&=U_ZNim1w;h113$F%nq`e9uVRDTI7m-2!aK?Sfx?eMI$Oz1k@uP^m8Jqf!n|{ca z5I%u-wB%jbRxa2+hi9MMTcx^moAg6u8Gmd=F(9ODj>RA-{m1^{IT0VKkk0r;UBw!_^@d zfLlcpByq1Tw*YsM(FE{rnU%a@?%Z*P!@{A13z>{lsfA%`5t}Ugb>18*g^Vw=+#_#i zuK9M?=9Lqp+4Hq8t9Dg&-QlzI*Jm%uqx0c?m~(#e+2?oeoI!(E@w{G!cgvhORYTWm zgpYIGFTAa1sh&u5$~>smFIz^&c@GC35jS4252?hfmc$WO;|2^cRP>Ux zQF2DQF{wU%;>XLkfK*u`NH4cf!^910SKGrHq8NGWE%){pxme`a13kWHyXXmPF|+2W zScfjS$;Rw;R7asFs({P1L0ws~7;nT=n%x*YV3Yb$8Q5nv@c8*7uziLu5k6eWgv%9@MCzanl=k>TyR2N|CF{CWhVBAX z2g82Cx+!cii$nF>UyW~g;XQtIcj3kTGv`@#=Bb@9^Cl~Oy*?a-s8*dZm)UkRS_=0gQXoOjI%{Q(m0aF zDlT486Xr`-t6H|B(cS4owy&AijoYm*$yyx`sx`e3;+E;um>lJ`dxcTt?JPPiB)+Mh zu0aM|hY)nbh^F!GR_-Jttj5Dd)57OZ-tr6bmnH1lxA1G2^!n&y*9{5$@Gs=Nz}=h3 z!|6R4ni?YDs)@K~0UuU&mWNrKwEb~4{}`tD%}|DEx;LYZ6f0=hCUmnhb@(iq=RwUz zS6NV!ATC*--v>UTldr^o4_TvBP9al?yT})ld$nTRaNqsvA{f*_4`y0uW65~rs zra*0^4+Ap$xGFuiEIDuf$7sT3Ebs{N_LoCfa`%cyk?{d^2RV+Q>}k33y{x2R9Hn3l zyf{!Ls1w`A7D_!WH?=4Af^)&Gt3s4wuP$ncab{>Mb-KoI%5W3tY@B$@e0WYK)KEQX zCLOuSPTPqLLvc<8X2zIo`*8!IK)KgQ3@4MOgw1;S?91K$c6>UTIg2vghE2P+Fhad;Zr93O+opXcuTbZhImT9Zkn=Ku1 z>KKZNGio7sS^-2982Vb;F!n!{_*oql-(i5q#BARsm8!iMjAiRuO7~8wXDWMpXqF@5 zg@>b8y2n4Z^y<>CNN@Rh@D#1<0hsO0=8#cuHIQZhx2gxEH$O_u7KJ6L19G-EKv4gRd^>$pCmCBA$ ztwcU-T))JXlS+flUbd<1$9u*|zB(kaIrf!(x|y{ES`^pA%l(PuRr|Dfse}UzvioZcPLM3b=f;_)elvR3lSA*qvP~|9^!V9-njrd+aEBZ(ZvKq!U9M{mZRcZkQo@PlF&1^Klz>mc1j#O zt7dmceTvc1u8~C#wW9Y=eDvx~Pj_A47MhBq64`sPrt>l_SMpp%d;eJLULEF@GC0s( zJA0M+6vS;tkjsoVs$e=-RW_t(0^5Y&k3I8usIx)yR%+%n!fK3#tnUg1?>dd1vM;;2 zR6M4t`UcTPmq<;`TOc=`wqUuP=hgUS-p-9eX(aI4WH$;TmR+8h!C)(|i<0qE5-qYh z|MUEz!;_KQNEX6}tgO#btt!@;$`O~n>1-$r+RI2@CCrMBieH7EQG%_?x(mXbCCmB{ zqeqa;5Eik)PXzg$jVG5(NshtF`jsFat~h0`v!m8$+!2l1pdVgY0W}}sUFb$G$=rNg zH503opqgc?dZ5-5m2F81fiFxaaTCZ0|46Wklf$l0O#Qnrz~!{ym}+x))HfwDe$Vi@ zcsS4RFlZiO69Er4q_jF|^~V#ekE?xp{SP%;{`52^zfhK``4UMi(&!JymT(_GRFD@c z=bq3BNKg+q?jE_u@Up<65sYF0{R0Q z0OT+bO7nMKI0k&MeHK1s%VpaXe$2w$jL8ePqYySsIcXd9C;{ETEeVHyl-M=5t?nR4gg&fZ)$0PFTP@Z_T@6VH0M>N9& z+83xEX1Pt!W+4F=<4wa8`dd;rEXb))67a|;k@ZwKZ|>CY_ZA~gpV#`!HBrN3hPGQe zT|oT5{e%AKgNJ`3UkPi=U%Mg$e(Tqx)%#Dkb`fvBhDIG*s|wqO@JIs}XwsoU+wI%6 z>H0rZrAv|xseF0&BX@qIs-be%Z_$md@QKcdkcDKL`gm~Y9MB6|n%Xq_Q`(^;`6IXW z!9f*gI%XZz)yCEHN5$XK1SIZdvA~d(#KR>htTk*bmF++|aT^D2XLPa#b22u_^jzg# zbu1dXpfOf`TGb;TOKLhsYQ?rx-qARug20nuG%F+|uyL-5wX3vErvd<(7G%)wfag$v zlrbJZM~PNR1rGHg57=}6%`obve9PC&#Jj9odg~A{im|5vg|HYKcj#{S*~nBFe`|79 zv2vQST(GK`tp_5v1b(#{GqIb-E|orY$8QwWF*-!l+on#&&~Qv>qoW`q<*8) z?JPn{x^T1}%nN_GD~?}Uwo&&jwa$Frzia@CirL2$2ZYVABYj|vViEO>xee5tnYN;r zeOG%%1fZrs6jB5}uB=3W%wy!lFW#Fl&z_BmW;|vHO($an&^Quj*7rK%&HZR_pU?gz zJkJM0hb*W~-dqY#qy6XmOOaBpY6kS~j-$rBC>*KUXax0gSEDEvO)n`2UGQjs4#vHX^(1`Dawpn- zu&Tl&fx~@!=nW@R%jy{KfLlz`)!t%3;r3VY1S_q6(f5jb_F%NJ&RP?K6Sw-^D;^%49@5f41IY$F2j=?<>v*CNy-=uC=8_&>l2b+|z zo?J_#bsAL-2@}}95fKSblkemcj zhNKIuv9j?2N9>$60B*g3m4WOt0tKs+35aWmb!$1ruq?+@t=GK^)))b)!`2gaz*331 z-K_jZVW>X&>6b$afOtB)*pOe*eQa&^;|89oOdmY?oM0hR<7=Ust<5o;&ym@Yvopds` zYm1Q#a;l@z0F`Sn+-#(vV_bXyLVL+>e=I65=ndWR=;Oe1JdzOL;!5mU zoiWp{3CT>e(M~&-=|}V><9^)zKBArgGH-!Z+(<-L zR#ryDz1Q83A3p~Lj|hA6W7zJ_{!|IeQfVT6pomz8mW;s5G-xq98TCRBe37B_o_V0X!*I0^;eVTe&Z{5)<&}mmr-rq69@2;dP^=_WNU(_*IYts--m#N z8o0PI37!7CrV2*{^$fug?NBy*^Wss;1~WS`u0nMnv-}N^@^|sSvFc zpz=`DS#QO4O8K5gnO8C0e9zF(wLF&>H=SWRG=#Bp!F66KkKboz15SO?_0DofU^g^# zYMR$W+Cl`1#YO-sI>*2D!a4#_I`$TcCRJy}Sd4)&_f~!?>CK7!*!62~D~eMSQ=bZQ zF*&0Yf3>{pGniW?ZH~Yf)^@Aw*;K?AyBsKxve_G`K;1$PtLi9glT=Rqvl48=@ zmCkJvfsp;(Inq1k*(OLW4N9zQM{P-Mc+>Jfc(|cHF|>V9{Cki?l21oqR3Hd>eh{CN z%$Wk?iT4L5uS4PAruu;mJ@Uy~kqqOorSf;lE4uQf)d-svWVAa*-q$LFXfvSE*~2Gg z$x|4|rA^-9@H}N-;FlvGC*c=uzrh=Mr%q~2=@uFhOJ3t<(D9|sj&@;=dg5S0m9OB$ zFmoIEKdrlZQja}@Ke(sdRy4u8dc{~W$l-xAE_*v*gZv3L1Z6l!DMthTaECi$6QGp9 zR~vW2pDUCnPpm-K7NFmt14mtJVv=-+hVU!kq2Zzh)8lR_KyM{jMA-R>wmzT1OUW-? zzNJ6>*$w8gF%dPZ9$5cBF-*A`mpG$v|viDJeSMmR3`%OVsi&Q$j2y{9a-u>8Hvin2rgYdr{ zBc?e6TbOc`ewd11M2x>QjqvoB#RFY14~s?OjJ-4wZ2PF(2^RbTIdK581b;~Jfo{!o<- zdWuENA{dI9yLG`XCmD}nRi zN0+JGr;@35cFw3rO2Q2@ue#K2rO+9|X;oaI+&P#YgFg%dV&*ib`Q*Wa+2)b})a{Mox1(tIfJV*|3Fp1o%mRZgWJ# z{*6<9tQu%k-LSP@XIR)Wg*8OeSy-1g zS*0LVV;pU1Scf6JOO>GUEmKB@el5x$+iuG;`Qf{6=zRHI*WQ+grC`PaVuEY1e}2I{ zH0X$Waw81}lzoJhObI44!h5>6k`Q9-l*-aJDMIDHWi)@V;?W}pwXo%ESw=Q6-lRbN zuhal@!LutAMd^sPcZhj`{AE1-h~z&Mv$x5S!`~xn$fj?hgQN@t01~hGpmXC)sC+Wt z^SAqGxy2&&QfXZauPevd!A#m@*SNaX)0?GFxS10Cr4L%}(lNN*`I+8~LxLHu&DX7= ze!~{MGZ(luF0PIOG!&v@^H4t`a3VE(w!{fX+N>g7afP>HQerRG=IeFe0qQ{Lg{^D! z#AZS6X$W&SwB392+nd6?p@*Gm0ZD+)b+Mc^hAf0Kam_a~ZI*e=mdlo@Hf{i12PePz z4G0i2{YJgYXK{7#E8F!oB`iBZ4NlJUP;dau?pk=4x;CEf7h?8`Q_>Iy zDB~|zeZovF0w6wvh0p2bhM29gbf{2gEP5$W2Aczpj$uD|rN12s(m3dCJ4LcG)~^g? zN=>=Tl?UX#z_LG{wrD}!$*aS$l}D?P zMw@J07%;Jc8>RWCW=4hbw~^9B%(BRs>_=19XF7ntcH(`bovG(;f`wv&84eS)^?~U# zTC<|J^At;G!%nd>#f2kC8FP7BCKK9dwBRstssA`khEH4iPP(+Us@jV=h*1ah6~UF* z9C>b1EDKGbsBv>!sH=zm6y{NgnWGrpz^sP8*{?mCIZ>GcLp@uYVJ@c^cl6>D{C3@N z=TT|eRwiYG{EpJ=zOUisV;-vef=ekD<8o86__wYZDR_TdbK3s(=IrH(Ydb2eo|U5c z_!S)=$4+_)UvxcB=GE~$ZeLz7kjq_+fhPM&!`^LBQ^IQ!|K` zk7nitP`jE3O)!22*+l*{KVsx@#=bk&02np$gVayxapGe9oaPXTs*lRw7ld3*b%0wy zLx8Vo3PnE5U00%RM468}k%6!|oRo3LY3$v$2A(da8|BnKVDCPkN^uG8qb`!kW{@x~hwqSK*8I3rIK23*(v`cO|78gzbC1 z{pfz0CKrCGRBnFe7Mneq{Nwlk@9BX%W0BknAAqzzx_$*lWvo5*sba98B`rV^y-zM~2x&m6%o z7x9;laB!!3dr;b=7rG_lpn(7W)&A`JV`JDLzH$0LdWa2^WS$5fY2ER#!iimd)oscp zSiGK(Dm=%O`W1$>quX`%k}8~mX{B6$;&)pRC?*hxaLCrf4iuzts>ghN`ti^;C{};@ zQ~o9RD(fEca6A^qNNZPRhM+5%c|hD$EDStNO7|>#goE7$(O;`sV*vsNLEAx2L1Ug5 zHgmz<0o8Yj_;0DV{h(NcL|EB6i?ZqTwgb9~hc_}va_5E-7zKEQ{cqg&m^>O%_(nMU zAz4V30)_j>`(M~eQIcOQlp-oLqJyi%2SGx2y_#s;(UlB8QrE#Hx)3Rz zt~}nmx58x=>wg|P+seKCN|q4d{d)G_Q&@X#%_-il>9$KiLv3x%x)X;)%b6cqPRvSR z%RImgD-6doASkWds*mZmkg0kBUS3bh0^OJov$rmCm6hl3$l1%2u9=)^v<^c3*IB^M zxb`-fL_0o-WVvtFaJr>TttMp`rNPQ`mULE5F^z zort#2aksJaYPg=g>;qxn3uIRXU=ZeGU@j(xtW!HVX zE&Ff3;y2ST)hqh+5BS&Ha!WVvn{R&O*7_~K`R1FiyXyV-K6vNJH;;ez{(C=v{K1na zztCr)pYs{Mhcm3J- zlvRLk6UO+EgG4>k0T_6gd>v9*$Qv)YcqhEZefj9YyGM^79zKTb>xmhB>K_9mKg>9; z*;!za@!+cKsaQb6CFgy7=SOuPF)ak}I`VrlWGrHwcmik$SvHoP^X9($qq@0Zq*h)# zhl_qV>~gx;syiUNJ+tXWa10o^!zjPChVHN&ODhHk>UPa^T3+zm^0~ta0v)-b>&My; zZclAZ`+_GRr6}a2I*1v&(R1`lkA(`DW~}O2c^$<^blI);WyZ-P;bxz`Jl7QFe0W(7 zsLKYCwEMnS-Md*M*o2oP1&>A~ z5~g&KBG?LG|9BSpg#rcAL$W0gDybJF5XBMv%%M`B!q1W^R=mf$1W#in<%|zBktT*3 zOE3+-s>S%0Jtf>rIeH*WSYc*6&17y1_Q=_sd*&9$a0Us{j-Rm4w|HC{Z6lsH}0A(4_2%z+i%@@PX=#XV|>(dw{wjaxag+9OooqPeeLXJ zQ!mXjV&-vUHdWuT(*^@hn-VJe;ugT=mbcjmfs5nLrdx#<=-A)%-7dTU>zwdBWyrZ5 z>J=i7PQph6B$4AJ`bWdG6SJsfP<@qM!l1kWh;sV$pLXM~KbkWTc|l~mpv9Hog>=m4*}1dnu{3X#M2R*UJ7TrG46UOb`?P9@55Ueit2)ZkT2CQn81ztd5focp7@j3$d&e+q(mcUnNBxO*q2?u zQX@H5l4iTzHo~(rmsx`^D7M{-fsaFYJYO_P1s+%%D9z`m_pPBr52&e^eJqk8O-Rm|kGn&XhNt{F4)(~}t&Z~kdziVltT)^oxF5%`gR z7GhKLsldqC0Ey_RDneV%S|*$)b{O#q)zobukeO4~dvxmbQ`_kTcAkTVmzE(K=Mom9 z$L8ILgTrj!>9VJ!ITQ5iTE^5UI+pFICSB6a7Q?dzgF98}MI6Ls71QJtULWZ{u~%;w z#6`i9Ys~T9Y|GDwa*2x3G!gRcO&*2kw$*^$IaIYtBsa0z^L+JYT!0XXPpp1Zh&>+^ zDPF(v0cLGGlyKhi&~%CNHXbOsUaNJ8bW^uG&L5B?!A0h9lh_+j=$h2gN*fvkrY2n06*BC z(Nyv45S8myukw4%*>=&>)hW09VH;0xe zRc^Uz#p4!-S@t?}xZ=x(y;C-eaVn*o7j=r!R2Dc}-xS(#(O9@*N_qEWYIkh#o^<=p zkt`S4=QGo7osx_quSY*M&-;`$LFUeu#v3g(eTgvwBi4MoIs4P%6zx2p<1qLKR(9pu z72}TdX1Dm3dB20ccPkdesnHrhLoN%uQ+DozzD$b^b+q_QO@(46&uQ*4?U|@#YJ;r^ zPNp$#bc9+sn1S#t`-RDHbybhI+uYgz!744Bv|kM7gW8vSeq==(lLgq07N1zBS)|s) z?uB~-gIMaCIZ!IRf7ecE(Ai?ZvsC{ZB>ZT1SE4y=4!2@!;{#KX~$w-~Zw9FW!IuVG*VM2MrIeck0|s z;OK3;!>!C!rC!HfUmtVShRO->=Ril@r z-(3xwy=Bi(Y9l$5bPm%7F8TVR$hK(1bjJmbX#++#*HAFgSbz4C@p3O8r4M;fw2x6o z-k%$K=Fu=*E4$G7VucnAAE2|jT^@=@y@g~X*redAfCfKK_3P2#_j|6sG9~_?%lA?h zL2rN&tYo5O4`!Ery~4kQl0jEd1JK9hfv}E7eta!FWhN}8M%BFx_wp^v2yFF%=XI-v zTiG|~4RA7zTinc61cQw;4cIX6Q216cI(RpNyKn9Oe{^qv=bESLb~_j5dcq+Xq{$*} zy!3#MjBxP#WxEP&UVg7IZK4)Ag=GoDVsY=|Fa-rlTV>>VFb!C49W>=IgcFxOlJ0el z9QRkbN?Nx#E_<^A^c1EX80%~7 zv;B^*?K98J@x*AEGGyWTVq&qSUHW{8>6SMMvMMDZ!Rx2r#n{W9;c;W`@X%-IQWf$7 zFc-J$>eZmHsLr^WUVn^1Q-OOP)lCuko{1AzRrV`REnj^MwCSpqt7_?RPV|_rL{-lp z+5Fdj`19h|+|xuqRCM;#0;60`Ffog&@VZ&7>CrC`A=MB&PT%k>Hr?QGD}2!+L}wSh zbhP;4Z;J3@A*EZ%$gs`vay7&?DV4@zg!yM8;VxHJaGD6!eW zHp|M%zEp|DY0LxVZBULc$tiZJgE&9OoFOn+g>}A_=G&{IU96f6UZ9!t7;UzUv zra`o)iCeZ+@8uveI4#u!+zD@Mw06#3vJ%%6y;7glRJ79$`;hk)|88Cza;dd4`H&xU zAt0BRsMKHH(>Tzj6*{AuVY!QzfG20cVM&AWBZQ%|zcwyZHLM1-=SY~LQJgUaO%OMh zbqp%95ezMf>gy2k-Za$_*9LXcy9<=NSoFfrEJyCGG0KG&R+eS(z`daKjFqwqkxLx- zhOe19OqF5HG9V8{BxVrTw86sQ;PsI>nG>O^6|RFd;wb0Qe+Ls|81FQ|6#|k39ZfHy zx$SBZ$MJGBy~0mzC2c;fY?XKg*gmiLBvr!(=z7_jz31Fw~p@L{{ZDgSY9)7&JOR8s}Z7tj3zk<3Y)wz zPd9#Vp5YNVpX?2$JD}fz)!wp^x7Wt;2MV`rrUovMICzx^-1CfGTO!et6IXtaE&6-6 zQ!o6UB^s*IPr3Mnb~c|HDCMb!Y&`10bll?_)@>ZN)pp$J*!diC4JQ;PLF|~Kq;*%b zu9`oaa-~?8pAuW9(uu3_FfGTrvFH;GYWedp&q<=PnuztaYt74Ba|b`vevSCc9@6rN zovq%wgFG)8CFSV}@gkSDv{>8Erm+UITc5$muD@1W@^z;M5rSqQw#4@fIui8FudZ7c#u>rE}*1W z>ZV;I|4Egnut%7#Z=%DTThzuFQM%uZ9$ij&CvSDOY_nGVa_D+0b+w1bZ2=~uqG%H# z3I3~8`ihbxLK)@vyo(t5^bSB2b6npFGYXiJ<1wVNm8$vBh4B^5ADf#8Q3s0K&3tT~ z%eOo;>yeK}m{*?3=3?S?gSKnm9m9zLUIx#(_25J}P_bQ53q9Ffr0%~Hrd@l1xI*l~`=)-oucg8P=yG~)UaG3vld<9f zbNLo@g+nV40dy8n^C8%>x8f`h3LrkEwkp{Ge>I|1q?pwx=onv&r#n@j@`~#eef2~A z4pz5IJ=h18U9un|Vio)gsw<>_^8C*;KB|bAzHcD!F7XVCU};ypx{=VH5$*$d4!i|5 zcFc>(5;S(rG@ktxY{-ZuUM!djj=_Ni6bBDo^osXve-h@1SgNM>9y_U%<%}wu=PV6} z-GMn$K3DUsnIdvRJHga6cPmW8Npzm}-W9!Ljfjuz`8g=*a%u=a*wTB6++J$#$E0on zj>xfj)Q;9vePj0P#|K_#&+S>Yd02ik$+1h ztj4g^hYN?gfiQ_#amTjY%my|}$kX5>m+|oLXeH2}yk@0GAq-FDfZ zayP*yJmWL@D7~RS_BePMN3S16OnRKjboa24r-#>pQA4HSHnWE)o>8WJ7`P?yDfZXn zVwr_CH+jHdE1WC& zjqu`q0>$ubk((J++A8srw^7eTj6r)*Z{Und6PwspB#b|1PIF|~Py%HxL2CoMfRM&_ zK}aSeOvn~%wv3|4fc56zuJ0M9fn{1DovAJ-olw{BR-trBfbi85^iG{J_~SfY^X)=X zc6hqGE&6nH2P0j=i>KUuYcBTxctt~uJyXJBUEJuKUZ}cYM`ET0ZG99!aKWK!#VeRo z7^-Q&N9|`_JE?gjk`3LorC{ItRLF4P(7bo?`&&1Ob`pK+Q>GF5Kdo=bnQZ%^5t~D% zfLe|-rZL3X%XaUa^bnF*DQPPlYvAJE9bEdl;I#*6vYGliU;cTu48faU z4l@qj*{e2Yr)bTm7Y|3w6vBi*O2I+0 zpf#2LBR$M%UTe%Un{awn=~<4 z&9WlxLaRE;K~FA_An4800p{2wD>T@flLAAOt*sWg?j=t_wL0>TFC|{c`n~}c5-T2z zx)*0)bKJ9km1|106B>8+-*O|8Mg^cSG4$XT0x~&s>taw*+Xh?FC{>h@DXBA3ww}pZv(KSx7s2Du z)a|?+Ld-_BHi|UpB4|tC(2V!+0^k}!gd^)HCPnJg*~{p=Y=5%~LZ7vF6fm;LKFN@Q zH@5Spz(p{TqAvpgxo5W062z&$j?$I=x2~a!9KNj=|6Fc&A1=P$oV`48ZAaM`XQ1+? zXC+@u;mz0!abAwc6zKj}fB(Y-8HOtMuiEV#9ISYB=V`VGdGW2fJ*;-FiklRT5!7+p z2tjH~^R08cFX`;IpHeQVfA_cbs{1Xp?z`slgZ)MhHk>@s6B<6II{a6syA4D4=l zhOW;);r`LT|AxPkD~Ivpp)UXRpMJM_^vRd}65pVI{ijX+=<_dcv=!Ju=N)8bm#(<$ z%MuQP+Gd_!6pLfZhF1y@Shw5Sk zC@GWXFrJv*qkJ+l1$~*SKl}c?*3VomL}hGcUtj=j@Yd0z^D}K@(S^q)t7llUy_FayyA((yCA0jHmXQ1@ zS!II%$sf9%MxU$2R@>Oya@3evs`3ddhYDy$^^FYYpK?_&OiNs@4qWQYF=!irI&~a) z6`r7K{L+)!Zt=5ll;DK&ffmBi-UEkDsA&h{qblz!Eh+IO3T7H~O#oNdFxg1u_A$@U zaw$9w$&4J|#h>D0K86c=V0!8sh+abY97~qrp2iG{m$|>-u;y*gYy4 zt@~b96&pXO*$$N3m};REHsNom;wCR{9dBI;Zi0zChuW|27~sdBomxtCOCH;ypQ%KH zeqQZo_F_;r{n*5*)0;R*NTs7-bk(Nq9{F`_Besgn(7HV-X@gjwZ$0B;zy#1Z($G^J zYY#uHa1yO1k$a@GVG{N|Q1r}`n{Y(V1KW04m4;x@n&-kKfAcxQs*?l{A`qS(!#fP= z)yCeZYwJX2JERw58euUVEX^c4>{t3=hc99WtDk36F@@Ok{5DPJ_X|Z_UT)1q>s%3v zu7bk$fwpHAzqS#{>BSSk|p9IOST`{`Gv)jCUQ5F1wGJ=pQf~$ z=^yyyyJ~E^UHM!kUuX2{F#G10b-PvHHSpgasCF!!R0Hdw4be!V$fBK0FxJtRZu#7e z`roDMyK9}p$+4;h(Oxc_34=2*n*a+(`znx|2W)dOjuh}tF_Eu@r8exCi?NOrA%(?~ zmZa#$zW_mP$dm&e-3Wa8D8Z5fh9m@%R$BU$Hwiyp%{tGuHdH$ooE^!k;`?g9!9)G} zrl_X1SN;Uk5xeivPc}8z3Y@`+L8QJM0e353&fJF>_BrhUIHJ=d;3p&nVmYbs_E5jL zqe=Zi4;i2O2N*ir>B)JX#Kw*mzNUlWMRoMsQ7z0mQ!uO-e4GybEhT~vqjy&n{nOvC zSx$QFmHO{r-tv~>Fme7*(K6cAS}jQO{Ng(l#H@zT-Elrkr-p0zn(vgLZm71ILY24( zDL$tP^!A5DJffSzE8H@rqk~TIqs1pG)`ui*kT(o7g9ZZ-fB17cgZRVWUPu3YpL585 zB>`n>bT8QLp9bMJ z({dG?RB*={!!i^l$+$@}8~R+x95A*(AR)4ko)8WNcGm2PZdPMOSHta}GT6aGkZcNF zK1GkvgOT6f)lG-)ry4wPA*wQGTULz_QxfIHtGr%e{hsqS8M##sxI;yO!~0RJ`|`MM zJd%u)7g$|Y+F=_tg=S;921MT)5Oo`>-=UeM_@*#krXF%MSAZAiG?wXoo(Ohs#Ro!T4c{<9=Ph7B4vg|7Y8~hfEx{SU#kEmnPrbCjB`Z;Udyqc%0(O6{J z^80YuKYIlV?mk8%ym3mN6I^OiL6U=ac@UfOuWgq#PvoOPD6fUZrHMdQ_n^m=Je0)e zE~;hmo}r^l`uM_0({zbJu85DRGL>sukh(DwY>tleXDMC9bWj+HZw;pqn2wqUileT*-LfSmLaUMk&hx zMCV%k4en;yA5UUp=Em@bxA%1C{fI0Z0j90&{H2Jg2(K+FIz%|rP~xBUmS?kKkWDiwpQlno3Ufqp z-RQhdytV0QTGP2C{w;#jT9JF9%MAyf;74G;SVo6kq(+*2!oPP@RZ_;ypYU&#Z?EVr z(MRwVgBg}cmZo1}C?5uK^;c83-G>1do#AHQ+v}~CN+HwGs7g%Nz84fmBF|qx(QJlA4s3*(zTL= zvJL5?Is0R=xTO2nt=GMLu|eh_<*dI2eY?PlJ-;_DRKYq_YH_8p=$xlBDDAnQ*!)(% zDswlzCS#hog>7wD#S2y?})5t&-glAcw3y!|0a;hLH@Q|WK^&t-HLul$UL}=AR9IMj+?>}!# zH@|!2=eO5`&Owa***utsI?vIJ79R_3|aI#X{n5 z^uwPQXbK1?(-v0@8FKud%?Yz_2Yqi?fAqrBj|8X6k@Z4Mlh^Z}3f93L7f}0WWAWb2 z8_!Y4K)(S07i9`E*la!Pqs0$@yOJhx`MDBb`2`cBH|n9tAZM}I9W5UJ{DX)07VxV4 zvIzyIM1Iqrq{SnSk6|7eZ{RH7&%go@ZRyxPbqwD#79;Rkn(Xpgaxb8k%VpZrFkJL# zblcsz`E*)TW#3}PCc(eYpO|)3J};Fd$1SkdAC=&%JaC)l^X}zBd5rkC8cPhBM)S*wM!X%$@7y4b|7<1fDjJHq??!3mwuj z(AfvW_EA4racB(d^In}P2b?gQQAn8FwrhlNXe|SH4f8&RrQjv739kjNo`TnE-LC4B zdNsuoN;5o4Z?&%{R#FVQMoBTrp0($KeyiP73T%TWn>aNpO-YmVhEFU@ZK4_Hew)j6$oKoEXYkufuSm!ibKDXK}JoiWdw|K)$Wl9Wf%brq{R;FeeBfN zJwl5N8G=bLCKJ_BH)lW3%WED81^B2qigs%m9Iu77rol%2f-w7gto}INTB+T7b8qxSu4&$uH=c1Ocpoi}3um$y z4;tfsv;5NF2k(xMGm;dHy~U{ATCG#BkL{k4dlr}N?ucut7k>0Yp44*v@9 zdi#a-jo`|_UO$mZA?tQ>J}fMjLVB1b|5wkLTr)hRrGjV(m>Ol|ZNt=`#3T2b7R%gw zVBXKTl_r58&H=t_TliQCxrBud71jW$0Z#U8#?f$cDb2wXFK*yR`W3a_6Bu1D>(%9R z0%=s(9WCB@_wjuIo}bw^FIY*tP@sb0S<#0{5;ppua``V;d>W;ZOInLF6&RCLj9io3 zYaAB@8@_9aNlF6Kz&3P*>@c*0JmzP&BTl%Ei_d_iHJ8M zL$BhL+ms(8)3qo3IvucOpK6AHDm#p!rs$OwDtmN%WY+Ni((sFkQ(XsU(6qKZDpZconK-?d7#EpFk!5v*Sk#065qUkHK*?0l~Lkmi47<>NDKB1y56no;cDW%6X%R`?BjC1 zu6sTUg%1=paz&kR$li5GY%vZ34&DmutQ=0ayRlQknO95;HWd3_+sjfW5 z=|irVVsnDR%W)$AmN!JHV-e=({d|rW-7yzFH+Miwnz${{wS}8rJVHKBVfP=u|3AFK zd}O6R$h%!T8S6DF1|j=X={NXTmt>Dd5@4&ZVaIcuAtY~2Gy!#_%o$9gkJfivnek`9 z?;pSazpvRweZ41ib;I>_`$)T^#k=pl|Ii43b7=;D)sh^>PE7XWD4(FvatuvGNqGFK z1>IXZMgFxwzy(x_aFa9kI!?97H$TKf{A#Ftk-5~4FLh$v_RW84>!k7f0J_joI z=w1JEb**JSXd{$%fG(b-kZ0N_6&&KOkhKwY=-@u_X7{RubERI7jd+URij*(XDNqlK z8~8IrBgW69>5dkiFfX|yJJ9P)@cd75?)w>~*_`rFo)Z$g%(qr(UU{7@>1-Y_}lk;T`hN647 zL=wA-eR_Ru1hZ2=y)~%&+u#XWQD3QY!QNL%ttvEk3L877(r+VOAaf^I;Tah!L!DN0 z3K9)k>pJO0sIH`2ak^DfmVhK3c48$TXZ*kiDI=B5<1iTl5)h`Cj+oZUJbQ}A!zXju>O3looTKgR7 zCQq4nUd0!AR>xgh7ouw`5`si(`R!u35i<;qkl;i4zoR;p%Z8UcJ@ zc$z|!;*hMrG4=3m#pssxPt!oZEC=qDy`)gJ@>2d>>A&37z!AcW!(j6YNrU1RS;GNf zzjLQH0I^&%J$VD~DKED^n_#WW$^bhM{CNo^0mc$!r1JB7>ryZ9bp`oE2pw?LHpcn zyHH-K{F;QoNZkmXO_yrui_4+evuSQ0Szc@>YqeY^$9uH+AARa=6f~us$4a1pTDEXY z5M?Kkb;t05InsF#U;!7*#det1>v||f1xpV3U~pZx^>*4Krt3NB^r9N|vZBAVE1_f& zk2P42LOPSPtCsRPGA8hIWf*(mghbJGIyO#_9&Vk;15}+@%m{TU)vmQDN zEwAchDv!Cpa_saO!Nd1N+oZO34#4wc6uCFHm~{p><GPG-8C)OI^JnRO^D?7I-jbex7`nZO;HjU;~8nTY)~-8E8C_?kdI z%?xbN-HS&S_;-bMDcw^UO`&21IF^VBQIMfO&X*&x%=XM|4iig;-ni_`;Sqf*OI6B% z#D?nHadYuM(a)!ZJ36mHXi2k7IM4&nv=rat{b`Ixlzy>+vH6aA7q_crASoV~mc z=i{d$prAKDsJW)N9G)+4;Uy~@aAGZEkw|C;PW?de!d7gV`C%DO*_dI*G^hmR_D1!< z-uH$Fqr`$W*C{&GFMLu6eKT<^^$B3%<+Fk^nH$e5pc&bDEML^}giPZfeh+whqOVDR zin8(@(pw-ue2`U^)bo)>OIu8%($q|SmCBKuADls#pr4OCNY>s+OM3qRa=+VjRB6az zYqb8or%-d*WxLe4;7BY8z=jbN(~5zrr$f$*EH9Szdg`n2V|Xm76r7aG^r*|p76)?w zJI5D?soFHMUJK8|4x+evfus2_mgY(-M~W0ZhlgrS;#)-LZVRE!f=PQ3+*nBbcDySO zezkSWB8oycr2lUxwK0!m&Z6E!E*Vi}g9ALl6t2M75Mc1apc#)>*oWqJu@4sZ!Hh6x zNZ}TS#FZh`8`+X%tv3TvmlYaTt}jK#YAh**MVgRv86-0PiI;%K_wqEV9#re2oL4U9 zRCbMfPb>a|#Z9**kM6zmv!6XNlS&jq^ds8(R1P7JhUSwn6O4MNcrh0CsjfAZ>Rsbb^c)qOp{Bb^_Yyg-SRC`q!u0MFF`mn(r3{GN zme0Mpfr8&`$o5DO07a}7yo?*1c_+!M#$}G;X(zTkH(?~z1U(l@uQbc+CLP|ptr;<@ zk2aL&r-Rq3TWoHq8EGfxb`IwSH4<_&NAJ0<+MKw>IrdhX1?3R?1#Zm^tn@gV`F&GL z?!_$nk(Hx{pt#1BsQATNjl=iIf%2Tc5TKtrsjlLDAe@d5bl%*_I%1*5A*Klc}Dug`57 zO*?tt{qW0H6@%-l!yJZ683j3jf3V#JhP(Bd#96Jdv}VsAAAcXLrCY}Gb^}SJS0YP@t0AAF4i3}8A=sowP`!m zB+*}(xA~_w5@SBcp^twpZr`O20ju*avU^@$2BD+Zr!#({qQH&fz7zh5X(S)_69lIP z#=m1&?a|^(pS1gqC}qnhx2Nbp2~l5H?zUvKvjTC;&iK(AT81iMaYwJ#QFRU()g7DP~m0p1nS$aJsm(%~>G?wHp=k4M*zK3ds#Gx0G5TzY8N3#>L16 zY~qN>ja>RzQ7HH!4Dv*vbl({X6WS?y4IoI?e(BUJT{gD5rJXm)<6xJBW5%(#k;p(V zlOs6Z%Rs(*lSGLr)aSRm4!X{-ng#vJl~h_Czk5X%^v+GPpt|LsZOZnTK8-Uc`qwa0 z%IveKOY)>;*L}M!`)|MEH`6cGEBcF%`PbWWOKazwZ+_#}`Ypft=9{m(>izdVc=!Ep z9{=q9_kRBPgC|dZp$|hp=QDf}{gi)6ALF&l^WCHOj^4!@{S8}2aL;vfy6kK8AUxHP zR}iZzfIfUp?sZwnKF0(K0y6g?kNx4#Ik*0oyz7`pT%L4co(07T=P&Fal;`mK;cwd5 zf%k0JZzl+?mlJnanOB5rs;80TVVS5dEeb z)$4dLT^jw;<0nrZXBF|g$*n$Ge8#Y&a828B!}1tHx5+$oQ7nGV>e~fNLw*X44~C%K z!y+M_gMQF=C!OLrJ(smzFYC$b5S@LRZM=;(nQL%g+jtbsi`cw%#i zR(`3K%xo{Zt`o%_^*;crt2}keGvsCpR9;nxC?$)x=(;)OZ?x^8>%XhdzOO{7Oa8Nv z)}nMrTA{CIB_Dp$1#^ML7qTp}WgnoRHIWn@Zz3uy%ib6`Qf3Yoe8742S>dfBmn|Kj(^(9s`)GB@e^ZU}6e?zAeS^ zZUml)je`n!1l5bKm(u_vg5hnGP{Kx6ZCatca#|x}b)E_qmJ9vSu2!NqG?!2^p$zBs zeD)XGe~d0g!lxjML&dF}z@0BA^{3<_#BA~CBRFNTcqvnaw7O;DZy0KNV`=n0{$uKV z#3_xFDxU7S;H6y4A$#JRt4kWgLwV`?^jZJGyhc7JMmk`#tkDOu5H=GXF0HCOJ(7Pt zl%v&-RW}JT%B#AYI9VLe{)$Xf-$w@wRE}DDHp0PVLD-%(WUZE4qofK*HLB>O!g8%@ zAHy=l*swXl#yvVZ-5@69tZrMNCVv|HT;9YPFOFhnQ?F&V?kA}CwV_^){*o|a2s%0t zz4~;TIgFH_XnNA9<6Ygd-!w#xsr-M0o~?TDa#Y~)FpRWRu5F=`W)qp4a=XL(hN_n7 z3bkq(c<3YVz=B+s3!pMr#E*KZ)AF3mA6Jz4J^Ip(zwP>O7hi8&*Pj-A^nU#1*Ir`U zz9^rtD`to^-EPM?F%XY0YTEM6;*+vzIM?{1TsaIvE^8hC^ygl0 z_B>NViHbqw?iC{R8>%IJA~<>ClhT!K3@lXE0!kC2boI##|lk8862RPTy;@BP^6yfk%gO#<-k;#Wj#i4h7vNv*WDN^l*bZ5)!HObQ{lg2Audaa1>j~fIhh`BZ*P=T`loZ!Ee z=vJKHt&H#zMFQT48CMOhY(>J*lFfGXEFL_5^1&}27PFksLpu>91T~DHl7g?x*uM25 zdEB)hfDIaV&s#a@2b}PEv8pSjt=lV@AhE`%uS)2f^om84OP-g38y*G&S>1t-xgxYl zbHdNA$Cw;$g4Vmaq9|330B`(0t~TY_Us`9aMH!eZR2@J=nEadmRJ~HrfzEX#kWC{^ zJ;PoRaR=$%wfMv>>uE-5s2XSZCZ6S=Du3cfnB?QrZs)P7M4Y=7) zL~q@I%vMEMxCP0*B<9SZUkZoYfwk36CJ~dax~)x>Ysas^7eLrZR_ais8rG)NHeA*e z%!@?_(X(T^WgH(fE-vx9)3sw%0xl~6Wq7$ateF=+qzvYC!e)}tNJX1i))xPWBKW48 z5d8TiX*nm)#ADNacZ$4FeJTPW)xU*y-n1P8sLUv)w;$^!v6`0LMOl0_lu{@r(+``QY8Uglj&U# zCYZpPwT&}_P1G}Itk)BuqPG>nW?Vl6Qw(18OqwOBBBY61&WvZg|B~0`j)yXAMk>=_ z?5DCrTw=G>ATpqmDHePS>68XArE{;qPA%$vxX8=XmMxnnP$ZH5Xz`hi4MjErSQ59v z>F@;FY*fFD7pK~Bcka4E6Kv0InSwKw4mdK>N1hOD6?z)+QpKdSdlBYxm$bhQIhy2= z!a&Sb)joL=s#?~@t)OdSlD=|a)$KUxan&kqx@@J-;aMSpzo2=+jvMPLY5+}1=2~)M zpt9e+Q*yv4>dv7Ec1EZ%i=U{Esuqc#H^Q)`L#%c&o7U=)>}Xa*sI9tT+xh#E=M>7@ z8vb?JH#RQHTp5a}nY7muiH#V_4Sjhh?b~&uMLrc|TROrDO5FM>Pit<>&M*W3LwdkL?AfV zqq`(&Ep!n9p*im}!`;7ys>F&*He+rOP~S1Cj++Xu%DS9JIS3eli7IEq@HxGf|E|nt)pihq=huEI zwUjxLMUr{5A4!u``6t8acG;;AeM??LEKp{*@ap9QDpp|{UJzqMLag*kxz zitdk8(Sd6bn%{xM#QrXNy!fD7x{!gSi@mlA6N!P`DbN8rbcRC=&0aouyBWu&HoGOg#LUGP+n{5!; z8<9MaSZ7HkBjnDb#itAdiolC1aV7gEYw{T9i>avN-V42pn58nCN<98lP z&mwTFaWbsBX_URE!k~@n`4O!DLLBn#4ke*qPnL2%$}YiH|lGd zmcbdateyTS?_H1MQHQ(tU-R+QpqCqh_nVNi-E~;#4vH>L)kFfd%;Z8wW2Gd@c!jb(eFAZ*D(IB{d zu}u@oLe=t>cf@$s%yt)hhBi><^SM{eJ)e0RR8&eM^%g*LCJ! zL3lAiPM}*4O14DB(7~Y;VMWNcYEvlL;vI{5_GV|VZ&*OW1rxGUhaES;c+Fd3okY_)vgNxU$!T_e% z%u)3C>1Wxz8uCaM7OQh+%gIeJTagDhrvRn`8tkOkB8$?3F&O{}75UAf01Lk-B4=&Y z=Lz=i%V_{6&}z`SWAMdfYJ6qPX($HYAsA1OES$~0U^E>v!OVf!H|hVY;IaH8Dkg_+ z5*WAI;|Xa++HAqME_oCY9xLEt3~R3bcxs6N2$OGZPV2DI=aCV{DbH@mcpo?`o9EYz^HCZt2hxXe?SWxBdaYsB z9En-Sxu+%%DUmL#-$g}HZcXdLiZ||{ zMAi*|35b?kZD_tA9Zhk?HYgL=^|-i}_-AqjK|>*eF|X4{MVs+Ab15cbLO5>R;AvEP>myL{rvc5K^E~Z_@rB^SnlL znap!_I+{d*AfPg#zE&v%EaN?p*7<&qYHNlDS?nh8e93r?N<&e{1M^$#wJih65h~^n z0t@p?v79pD$%Y*=R(VnXs+oj~P_!NV@T3+d%LD!*UUUI-A0acimxbxur-M;XP(4yXPZAPyD`0s`XzR`D450XNr``_PuZJiR^r zaqJ_JKsj36Wl`^SUk_e^Cfg1(0%*0}7NsxW7G3Y?D^GA#kV1L#9dD)$ZP{ikYFE1er=_@>TtV>0 zT&~`sLweq`lWjX`mp<*CU46unrg_!rsCrlTlDrA>QYqs{ci^>xQwR@W_;_u1Hny9u z?h|oa^6nOW`Q5p<6hyRk2@kRav6vzQ)+!?#SPems=wkxjsP}G&k^69%3*O|LFFA3z z$#&>|gi}|CNWt}Y)~<60?$zP4Yo%KrOQnkw)yH|#px+c$5v?q(b2SniVONLKw|M$i zsw=e7TR-_;qmjaMmbh>WI6g<-+T?*9q->mr0Qq+IhZ`0S2^IcGGnwA{11y5~ycCr~Sw;e_$1=mwKJ8fRsk6_cQT zB13D*&E^i<8*t1_txvE#8E=f1{?Bx3tXH==y}c-&A0A*YwgIsZa-P%Jpd`d``j&I` zuBGqe?*Lmlng`gPf@M*jM{N}Rrrxz|%n=k$eIB@cGE`TWTNY6~uSqKAX>Aa>M&2bRr5XLomAO9Q(?<;8*iH4RZ+ru zx8&mEWA3gRq!OJC&$s@!!nZ_b`7r%VrN8Nl+Tm`tI^YmGKx>YLKG zyljYjRHy%38fbI3HejJbY8xJCFd_Qe)j#p)#H&f?I~Yz>eWWA!x2rGR9v7X!NQer| z4=~p>gG;0ZvuwvN=#wC5`0K?+1j6$=vMyjuV%I2;WZ2Jj2bZ#p0x=RTv#vy0<9$VA zVZ^!a>^ib&@__syxKS;-Q!+apBG9>eq~0g(4t-AXN{ZV+Dg0&L^uhBXqg=~Nk<7dS zvGF0)KcBnRROiL7YQHRvQ`Y}9{jP-YMfF2vdns3LNYFQ#a!_TzBw=QD9;?BPE;ZkA zalu<0VpZ7y*TySRodc1tu0*iuT8A@&nzLXiC%#!hbM@=c&0KV^+ljA#nc4B6E_Q>3 z=2E|t7cy|cse&*?F>PuAOZQb-9ThmO5YQsmL%e1~XV1?)xH1?)v?Lh1Yph+Z|1fcy z$KT(Su4?p8O|?i0nClB>N=d-;YKn|eLQ{IpXNk5ALhw%v{;XSaX*brM%yR6-KzW(@ zxR_v|T3w&nXFNmM8 zI@6&l`imMKg#Md(oj({6c9V3&)n|g$y9uhhN{zS`$ji6~MUm5`liFmwf96fQUS7vq z6{Q!5ra8WSUMI9=ryB`cH{RL9$kF}jajerbMv zdHRnmNlvgnQ8b?P0~Y{oK$5?%hOg=48{s)qJ7VU#yz=>Y(TYRx)W54(#Uebl#ShYZ zH3Sk+Xo7>GS3OGs@}X7IF;88c&abGupiJ(f>H1;T3WraQJEY3$>1*fJ{t@heHAItaN+t@@4PJ8P=}-RpM?d@d&;LemyME5E_(k+nevm%Q zdmqCmFMsm#C(LfXNa~LD3e)~}ge0aMieYT36Qtoj@y@$EvJ$e1mmL29lBF+Fnc0d{ zL0r7T(A!$NMghETg9w-GqK6eLHMyVudMGYfiht?0(5~tSFA85?7W;!_Qz0ZIs_fTW zf}h5j+yN<8DQ!)-6$-_OW;1S8u!)AV%6neDZBK7i^NPRSja4a?5upDfSoL748*om8ywN2O_M8gZqO8+E#V{p3|$xRx?CS z6+)477s2TD9XrDxdx>dafY8f$*=>yT_slL9AsTDnU8E~x@-&@B-I&qTCvaj3i%{_$ z1`IO~pX?uX@3xcf7Q7&emW7Jw6*}D2TtH7*Z}$Pwf2dgonAg-sPLZ^VU=6(K_H|p} zU|@;F5Y&mI7{4hl%iBv{$E{rtJvdC__j)xPPurmyPTz?O?Da};mfL-Yj*t5*XsVBk zgB>Nnd}ve0d5gm8_6%3HH+wlPyv>3+oU*<~hnkT;0^ zoU?3J?4Q2c;xMF`lZz7wjv^)I&N7%1U7#gY(aH@yq1055>sT`PvXEnpTaQYU)b?I& z{s%0RegSr91E;ybUt`Z~kP|ghS#>*os_KS9tFU93>)LNRoXgP?kwn9zkvsxKoVKO% z(B_NZrtUZozJP$vf+IWV4FSu|Ed{DS&h~j!09tg2kQ2bJ*6QJ0Ot$F_B^?LMQ5kT#0EBt;8BVI`(is zTk8v5Z(7BciFT729YGBpyRt{3t84LC>~!Z+&Hy5KNI74w7|3ysb{4Ktq#`1kT52Ww zu~jT0zpD2xe6^CbQYf#mym@tW8@}OoNW_jj8@VF zihN)H4$XF-)d9#nmr@Ybbl+j`6A~gbn2l1az1apd=tUw~htsr4w(N((l(gl!XzBn_ zrl^86lURYxc#)fqoYFX{USXh(tqp;qX~2P{J6IS1iz9Pyej@R4X!%qJbP;?W?x2r!*B5&lpsJM$44EvM_w^c|`J8$+$cz&I zrxD4oa{4n!&}rgy^!iF zAy_Pfo12UOY(#~3--#fXC9fh1n0VExSQk7_{b3EB6X)MU;j+xG5#v)=KfZWXl+s&r zuUJu(Bu|^!2eOp(O*OBYs5K$Hf%+!bu;@9Fx&Sta|j#veCM!8I{*T z{LlXxwt&)150JdUnT4$C&;OO>%CY3ysqx)SEs&5q4uyze%0kt-N@O?UHu0-!V$X)u zJUmE9f*7T9vQN-Ai~i#^j-97|k;fvv8nyL}{Xr~&9V#;>rjJG;=Ud$6$DXMaMlv3Q4pPX zqxG1(kaUW_OrG;bZsVdSj$RejTYWR*h0Maxj<+5m@l%6OyRj1d#N0*nE?G`zuA)DP zMDUjZ_v^M6M~q@oJ>z>~_co_D$I7ee06J^x1Ma7F(~XFKsCea7?%uE)TR1vu%ee43 zG=1+AC3|eEr@h|9DLsFA9Eq`o6oK-iS#3Elr#(nB!#dGH1-)0<$TU^&QQ@gqI~owh zRMJ#e&m`}5#T>0G%jr<{)^)5y7V(<6YZ0P~7(3Tl-P&xyWpEm zfA9>w#i=j_PA%Yjgk+DiB^nU&NNc)MN>}B=yU!K?oQ}m_O*>zIv5V7!SY!F7jJw|K z8k=J1y9)P5WO`X8t)XzL>bxP?jctg;*rh)}F`i>(`7utYKG`;QDb=j(|MPz(CIm>v z3FzjF{0U}3?!;`61V2>9=j=nda%mPWIaeGuB0pqyRP;s3C^Ar7FIKQkZ5(H4XesJGgoFMI@zI7( zf|QOoG~0%8t(qI|_Y~vPlk5D14VlPRDIK7K{P`lcZaHI^^jZ_Rhj!RCR~odgXvdH* zX>GGVD2Sve6_ZvsXmEmI-qwmtBMPLtTR-(oN%*@o5Z)U!d`J5A1S!@L$;l>@hYYhA zQL(wVuX%@j#DQIm+}F?2UyS|1=e0wl7Y98hi4`1f8~YMquP3Jzc#oq2k%{ z+$DtoLpupKK}PxRHo4P&5_JMdOd=W^v`;5a$(;p=hk|B}Asbps;8rtzeD`rK1Hx!` zW7B(qPi*S#)}~;V+6RsVogMY{B3G2vX>2mXug+8X^bfNUPJNgcN{hC9PT4sv1 zILNLrx1)p~QRV=TWBb~WrC7<_OmnlDm!eDeOBs&`-|@)t8T}nn+|8uj4lY5)QqHTZ zWq#2eB57B>gY5RqVX`hIjBb!COt3`5#$Q}4Sf~fH64ckH&!&fxP6riJVEKrq5ZO#l zmltDX3lz%~+u?Uzd&_h<`2J+luVjMfZuF%HF}Uvs30EF}zF3*_H!`*oL;E1lLTJ4U zR)9H(zxcywWshGe`gaY*+)G=34;HLqnBy6t&iZ6jxVUrQ2Qm4hhB1#lDIk~5^zwu2 z;~4@FP7-Me%B@{E5)`t{{ol#S_|d8`Pbb9M^}E6{TDs2kwCSUAb$ZF*hx(nBm54tW4;6MEkT+tEIT;2rl#T*0+W-%(kQ}8|z=<9e;Nr)4 z0BI)xNM&o}!l9(-q(rxCqsyx5^9*@s0uHR|#Aw3pmWp8hvN?T=%;z~BMeqKVmo6@E z93W>*)Y5t-&nXtLH*W8PD&d*30%3Dey6z1Ki%DnI7#ISh^R&XESV7~GbFHm&h zE{Xs7KzNOo;yP&@KpUezN|Qv0CBAyP(k*-*)x-R7|O*7s*9 zcLF-gW@Pkm%SRi*Vd05Wg=VnJ*7V*rItFUzy;`>}vs`Oa(?m11&&qhIWw*(4on_bc zYR@w)%)Gk;K(X(HUtl&>rGdgLG4O;^NM#W%9gNRkDm%9_m2jxF!@{>vzwgF_f>c{~ z>y}P=SyxgQ;?$*kjxWJ0k8t&PS&qw|Q-zVMZZN;1OfuIAXsxjWz@1f9J7p;v)ano| zj4e;jcS7);K}sV6B1yA3$iSU>{jQm_R0c%_Ww353uPfVIhIm_TzeEaVNQJgMulUBu zFkSmLT|bB@Wmk#{<>V<3%4t2lb$N5=@i-WMz-&pMJpRBd9qmN}cXb=|%cBS&_S##u z$2U+-dVHI0U(4wO;C;*=w6+bu{-882{Rf*B;~?rZRii&;F6geLyhhX2H@KYYkn%na zEE81)C<=CMp^PpWE*eNvl}1+LIVjAqZ7p(FBA1L$E9)MzCuT zWf}vlTMcfce;dU@&Ycc~YD?O!UYT4&l5d%$#$YV4%nQJ*b~Ng{Tfp9u1TuXQAcoW1 z%@eE0KVggWvwvb)rlZV-Ls6Lz$C|ci8)!0Ch|@*StekDkvd0024bm4BeSvwrPK*Xs z<7vIskz4%Yb_9l#l>Snc6h;a{Of4EYR>Hd@i2#E>lB?WAVpcM8@n`Fzk3nVRGR4X) zmvm5Kwp3Oomy`1f7Y^q=8cS@CZTq_PA|~20i(4KE!V3ZskN|fpF{e$d9SXDFty)u% z*gEZzwYs93$cka<$r*OP9$D3BzPIXb=F;LU0SSq+|BL$M7QJdsy#p37)1J?8X-cLO zt?O0L$9Adi^SMYL$a1rhC&tYmpECs>6xm@y=O&k8O+MV8Z zfa5?z@mTaMpfeq^URn?UDng!bc5lCKVYO_TbxBNp7Nxy)Vu}^P)r%5Cj^+I}DZnfz zsrrJ!$sUJkik_Eg;pxpzky$bn`@Ug(*X3lebj(?N4O)1KraGJ6P-=?(boTcM9Gzio zt8;7!L*!j%R@>*4 z<2+$c`d$yzhHOKz0WflB!lDY>{aC4#3>{>HeM&g1P4^caTXlUQ(-H7O_cOCF74t2( zqv^_O@QZMLh5#ik~Q)KEQkZ43D=s{X5Cl!dYVL zk|+Vn7UFE_F=mapP81$ZWJil>Q*+wn4k-B_vjobsHmsKM!cmlbAkYI!fnHe?)EO6k zi9N`1Z`BAu?yWJXWIQ6GB*tAAr68hFR&|SmJ}a-teJ9veu~Rj@Rw9>*ae#01daV+~ zJrG5Tf)>~f5r<1_o767pqgRMamA7>hnB(6QUcVbHoveX#4VQ-B-Q)`88$6g8bj_sG za4%`Q4pxKJYs%zk6UfY9h77V~DYO3R$gi@g%tIu~4aFe^x~uNb>1ls1tnKYzhk{>o z=gR#wPSTYEmWjisA?O|gnuuR=&$2PQm5usfMYCI7U%vWK z08%cJsuaXjYgEZ6_wUjjbX2(Jivf;C!f0o}(Ta@}9iWV6c#K=+RgfZ`oKFSB9-X7F zCgL^&DO>-Z_zw2~aM3GnQx6^xxpw#GSPzn~)UD<)-`BbylI37DF7gHZeb$1}w;WuF zPHuV=xd=ihz>r z(_IMf`p`@UriQ%>zt2U{Ds>-FOhSPH-j;rS@EmfPKiq@Sj0D0*918DOq(4LY(7N1V z2gJ|@aPde$!3zvT_^ruWYN$r=1I5gdqUqmdP!oBhK4LKWhO!%%&6yKyl!v`bzvOHekIs5fFBXrA@{<32 z(&#>*wXa5K4XsdASVGrAmPAUn)T?@U6=L`F+i>WkO%WrOsyjP z>!Pf+k@lk8s9q=$@OV^V!L|Hr=;~Jg*OS+tSIzS*zG{;-a8^RtqJpxiAU zYu5?`Q%3VP@xqzP)EU60qR!uS19$ORR0nCVz^Q64?)RGdqF4VDdfZ|X+j^r*bw|mh ztyjGU#Ze6?3M7gu;LmEJ-s0|--LA#BZ57Q9rUwV_6f2V4L#MZLFol{!WF+`@?-?nrG|`k&si?B# zP_MVWMyx)Dh7iXWI7i&89YiLs@;Y$W^aVq!{sRj0HcXZ=TOx7IgRx4-c!LlYr`d#F z#qU*Lie zSG;K&yF*>E#@*JM{3?StDeWb%XgKny6HJ9KOr?J#5H8fVYBL(KNSHSVfhL1qcwI6Q zeIpji5FJ0#A3myk-deAa9pO-25^i$(e{D&kZg``stO1dW-#1w1bL26C_lAz2pai7G z$KK4ngoBIkd@%=z%GoQtS=3TLucB?IhB`$-;~|n6^!+@K;)4CGOMzSY|L=QrH}&YK zx41v3(9Br3!J{2pZ)ROM>utFO+E=wQFI{-MblLgPx&Oqg1@IG!FG9$e?V*l6mqE3= zhq4wbJCYdgONeQrURBM)XiHk!V#(e&lL?ZX_Q7gb@xi9peYapojo^Fyqb6`@q z_T&`4BLDE8#W5ufw7|htV5CC!TH6r_+V(z6aWv&gBbxYcVW7T*ST z7I0CQSBFkc=s~BY?gRI=h{$M^lSanshybMP-hX-|MKJhrZEPdI#fOgSc{e2uFO?>B zn~J%o|I9c?mE)o9j=@3O10bSE~V#5qt8iZe{*q#jLDNGBpO3-h+RiQ$=QfCBiZ=m<>Z?R zN7eNX+Sxl8p3Tv2wit4@$Jp415IGxWBu z8`rSgqO;#dSO$D+%GP1os&eL2%#pzxPikmi!6SX!rJsiWpLXZ5gB+F-*e#$`7c zT`Un!TYEoyB@~%KoW50OXuhTLa`i>>CnPnoSJ(b0(l-hJ7V#FSNOtZI3LH-s`hSRe z6`BiEkaG@gPvrQqI)G{uK5_pZhYxECbfmLA-cLEFm4RYp*Y0kd`#u-$F&(ChrY>_) z8WUAMMV*a(aajkR2ezOZ4zHtkd4sAVnEn}YrJ`(Sv^e@oMndN%`^y2EaNoqiOjl#I z7W-Q5#IMRmI2egjqUu(0(o01T%ji}4WeyQv3y5#fx@U%gcnL9X~{FM_FQwT5HBgelBi>)d~KZ!JINxe$J;6=u_+E-r3w=+q-162t4=H z#{#?POmB-;XhLoWRsCqjz4q*Jwjb*rs1Ds*`VQ-(b1p0@!}hfG9e#LF#eh2IVMbG| zJXTIVocEz<4(1jUFsd+J^6GE zOfEPve{ejh>DQs_Dw<$+3jrxtRF(IMHDxBn*VQX{G^vY6GFjWFC}l4~E6a zskH{}vbSMe#%a<|BA@Z!|3-`y zjq1;*ymiyh?#n%c4uBPptuRvDx7w2bvXLxIDFb{#3I4d9eCgmqluJ6S%b2Hw!|bSu zaC$xK2G0KI&Pt@l>08rwUvhQb{2e1rfkZpQI1=&HZ{d354)CdfOpoVsx_QTY zj^|IpmzXd7pHC-y$56Ms=Gx!=+y|Ikd!b#SMrM3jw%Ziq`fO~CPNm_JI{<22)^c{E zY>sNBhQpX#=I1TVLZ`+{8$|%PO-#bj+O@$T6%+Q-*Jk{Yc`rpjawVHf?-UPIX?Ib zeQm8tv%|2bQEci!Dwg+*R|kbzsl|k9A#3k&81)lrG%WIwqY^TTRWw416WfF+vKC1O zFZ&M^9T+SZ?#*RWWzkMoFsA3)T0(A%wWoWAbVw_CcE$8!Qz4hciBa{X;()wAhn3Q2 zhjo8fTc!^wqm{4(M2c>`sTG*HXE3Y19p%cWH2_2iapB z-IFpmxU$^(Sr3_oXqmy5li&r_UlQ0)z~q5OlSz%wsDewoi%v}^mM_POIF13nl~qe5 z*hlo6TKl%9F(=on$dgV{v|)bt@j4{dh%ke)U@8u;26*VTymUks{4aVAA+Deor5jjp zz7luV;>i&`Lc|ttcfa zx5aXN@Q!y?Z^1-6puO2)(FF%LSkW`X1j&eMx}G{1+NlQL~_voEAHNI?lo6a^U%lO`l7W}??C)E&L{>jhlgE%DsmP%T7e zbz;AVukFtrgEA{Kl0n_%S?5G5YyZnk4rmGY<-Hn$mqz>LEzj zBD{Q2>940!&%~a(d@q7TaHPz(4vs;nKt+UHML3pFj8X`>I#rF-P%s*`i~}zQhLLKW zzKOcKZ}C0_XyA74m0ul;=5VNEe_j$$`G$LbXlT*QlIBtGi+e-`%?m?Fmu5{j*ssbN$z^uOP~kGM6}z0SOMn0DAF(4*I91_b%CnHFYA4-vWXaX|hb2Gkp89LRx z+cwo}k<5@T%0Mu&?|Zi0ptcz1$9izP6E#9O7xY)$Z5!1u87-DF+A3w=U9l{}xY(V( z1N|+=TT(}NE*n@VK&fIdeVDj%-(4|g^tI^%w5M-JeJP;Z_hjx%b%HTcWnz0$SfCr^ zevGNNPn`OS6g-jKba`tZBpZf`WF(m$;nsvk*KobLB>jtmlzgt6bY^dw5aYWLXCIp> zx{`-t+&YDn;3XF)Wt`oH#~g(G(1TkHd=9wi0$L-0E!7Xz3%Z?9F0s))bM+5{Wk4l2 z*E3PAh!ANLNX>osW8D)XBtJ8nvV@N9R-GB;PHNL&4;kL5?02!EAGyQE%Z?`5dl*r~C}0Rk{3{sL1i}jy$NcP%6Ka0> zwWs5zgJHB>_Y#6`*w?WHqs5u10-IZjO@Y>9%QATj)tczaH}>%<(^!F^4PY6sd*HPM zAbff#rd3bSrPu|-IB}^a(>zY?c`fHZd|bl!{8pT@pc^))o8W8d>I zJXo)`r~lHK#Dz=Pj+IN#D0KFYq2TW-S4yKYmCks9U^tS+qO%X$T+gU+&rW zqYovwBt{oq_w~N$zy1<$cE40_++X|zzup#mcL%@v>YuBve#@`E`s!c0@~1!f*(X2$ z>PJ8P=}-RpM?d@d&;LdrihjHFp-R#v7D@hbb9^_cKGZslktA<(L9;ftG5#uo79+caxLse+Hex@G z3S~%<`D`xz>%W46d3pm7TPz_JSrTjND2BwvRJuhYO5mDlDkTRWDMmYt>8!VAhZmQr zH7&*77{csO&c(kh*_HQpBAmVHO!d=*UyD0?Yv-n0TH0iutCh~mJhuqLymL%U&baUt zNjf#cpVj&A{zAn3O1<61o=hj%;xAXfyv4ARYt%1f3LuB{y^0!?Ykg4*9YABQ&0y_4 zg*#BLhEWC7^!OR(zAY49lX=K&j~r{MR|@H;xF7X9DLnX3nIo|Fv>*8%%xwPqeK>mu zF6690zFCp%mP2Iym@&kAiiae^qLBiv^@l{rhB@MSq-@@gR%5p&VKJATson?OZb%Sf zFTvMB1|~r0$^Ty#ox&`JZhsNfr`dJes%B0t8Q`I*qt`J>{O%6d&X@tuIo5RD(ldB= zQbRxugI5ZuvP~JXWX0}BArUU7L|d5CiKWSmck<{kBX)Pa4jOG{Z5o?(W!xS09tJJh zBy_4LxJ2#OWix$#ifg=H5ahEkrF7^}@1Txc1%(aUD3Z5o-5Kx|mi_T}k?SHN0Vgg! zLfsx+zv-(e=fjQ(W(O`sk=1Jot}&3reMmycHfE~emfc%=?8Lc(7>%!0|DJ7xsn&ef zbXetEQ~%q57n=|lTndGzo$!lW3@3*nQcZgzh2({m`tBSyru46iZYmp3E-LFDgsNVu zT2EQ>x>ZnmtHf|dGj8G6Z~t0{*R`2N0}S`C*JEWb8sCZDBd51V7mS79@F5&~ zikhO`yh|X^zCoi=&57OCXgu;IwF6NnPoy2f7)S{&gzD+iw>Q_ZTa&yvBJ; z-BRH;fHtPRheoB{v>9JrO9b_VA_zJn$fyyJIYcO4nYgGF#uoyQoQBe^k-#YZ@K8_9 z^!|0I*T^V{@a*9L_;9O(Kj>t+M_BY|+W)h*?*qV$#<7O64~_%v7Gt$U%F{%+I~!Ks zWGcX2sK;B}qY?&?(SJ4o$WSVqLg4%vm6$$=3gZj*PcSs@Fu1!8n-{km5GqQ|WQIv( z|N6?zzBM*tlsxtjDL95?F**X000q$Qana-wFlCwp2<#9TBN=EO3L>oJxmf?sY(WrWjcMcl3 zjMnbrOwOUYz)o2zLHo=X`C#P*KOI=P#)DX>ZxIshfEOX;2 zsE%p}3|Y-zehkz(w$i+0k6WuD&%y}h-R71-?TnJ3rcBBw(KbO4HCk9PRHTq1^=9__ zgy#y_S>I`!Z;Of6xsORz?3eD6y9I27x}%^zNIO!vRLC{lmhn5M5K6J=OcRFso7)lL zXShkXDQ9OcL$F}#vR>M&z#apztZoVBGNoGds;I@IUR!mM$)a@OYl?EF&}FogHZm_f zcjop1bcgG=-0~x$f8lp^(bVj+ z1fPL+qXOP?5^UvMDA_6>*TFo}_hJO>7Cb!yZNp~!=9F4Y0X3FE#q*}0-J8Mf?^M=2 zbH;evp@i0^G``Y-p|&*#9Ve=Tt;Hw(=eDXgFD{Dm>pW|ZXdTOYuQS;sW=@sOv6rsa z6!*6j_~A3c@>&|?6kbPZ(M!r2OW)DM}!G^UFs!gVMnOv45= zyf-^#xDHc&^yH6)n;DOK))#k5U4+s68M7Zqw!o}9x8CBCO*MTS8OF9|B3HNrjQ zbjHik_#bkwDLGQ@fGrx#?J+dyjn(1*s|zejw%O{hAi% zomi++qX+w7>Zxu{txDiW+?bnu9$0JQeWv@K%-l@1y^6IpBgAa1C_vpr0%TikpL@%Y zv%A)*@1)0d-N-FmJ{iiJ1AtKKuG2k%VwdTB%zJ^V%c2ur7r!w&%XOhy7jUY?dFUqq zC981Z2Bav@f2O+Lw1o#-3)L@uqFHAU+~+Dd zsuVT?8ydZ=`fJr&g^tPs&hi%9jZCdO)(i*&sW+CnuXglre$j!UN3QHLi8Iu=G z8N6=2H~tk1!^y;+(XcBoizFawZm6KTjN!2@j`hw{f&nwm(+3hF!)4dkzmv1_h{;O} z*G?V1P%H2B_SiKO701^$Oo*TfN0F9`D7P^H8$!PyKz*osm;y>Nzw4Y;LjbF1TtA*V z0kt|x-=U)h5dknK)(N#O)hzlnQMU+OnvGX`suaHJ5(PMrlcV=E!WM_Vd#$FrQ4=N4 zEhdOiTs+4f{>4;JC5Q6Y%?e|sDDP8NLkQeKdvubR=!H)brh|w^<7tTBqcS%^{_!YH z_qbk&&+pnOsa`h2WDD$9Nynd5)XTW}K?cNqCr%(uOIrb2vP=@mL^6uly^5`$H>jS{SdD`&-4JOSRZe;=z6x%X~pjO6yadw#=As_a8Jif>i_1a$AZ zjj|ls17VM2-R>p{fy29a$3C{(>k@{>1!}7~ms_H@PLR#;JD5s~Ihg=H_jTn;M-=TX z@zQe77A-+W3_J3Lg}e0Wg@9Z!L(4h1XCy6sf3E-fXJnNYj*~)jhYGDQcQQ;?PYZ2%RT4$$K-b zdoF5W!i|b9pY~)!*I(obM7ghi?>0vhEd;GlhVbyW_3qr4{^4pe8wp?9Hh9+2^5ZSP z?Dn0Id1{6xzJ;Vldq-dI>J3zl`gP<>lV)D=d^MD)ou{)-AaY%~r1b{t!;Gsh`v~XL zl$@p%0s&nE?${gG{UJk}GXVGE10WLfH%ipXOD0?pPfTT0Z5l#28Z%B8uA*1drXc9y z5L(UD3=YDvI@#CKi((^m%uRg)Q}HJ+8VZ83!E*KCQwnmX@1_psqf#kjgw@ z^AqJr*T<^Lrg1w|OAEK5U1H_-nA_BF49;_gm}rXkNp2}UCQTlSi4~*(3~~p}-_&cL z!GVE0Lp+5dy!LEdv+bp|M9mLzm2^pTTLlj`b{v^Z(X?oV1-~_m@p#4&toRz}XhE>P z?(e}2JbnjOynAsN%=v`K{BwJK=E!$?dn`(t@9>snUDg6;_VkfWU(k~;=(Q!&+Ozj_ zOy7Sl|1D_u=JYKZpn6|g|8sij{6c0*2^d1q?FAwt8J+cxaHsUwX_6t!nMH$qP~wb) zcB>i1jvnna|DYpjHNlMRLumfw72jHL@!hslW5*bo3tV0uy7BV#X6_3CRsu98(g}g+ za1|+zuIMZ86;oEyeK1X}g-6X#GPvrcvo)x_SZXGEGxQ?{eq0v)-W?Ow>Z7_*3lT|* zOZ0m`UdNCSc=6yL(Bb~b+5_$vE^3anDBBqQMym3sQi6C6AGz%1m3jk}SFZeXDLEhW z#}U-z>9jNRK@_1H$Fe0~Djc~0ndak$zOZXkSWm^-McHNW^DxfYM^SlaIuWJR%-k|% zVx%|3;@(Q{m$=ZDu@GA2akc(uL7-2LBvgA?te)>xgzQs)ZxUx7ykCimH|UoN3<0-L z5wAnqNz=5DZ)=K@UUry!xGi+Jyc*OfY`EHAxHD4zF>htM9|>+=Kn%2j=UZP!s{JmR zsD?p?&_g%z9PTX$nvTBiTVCSOl@K~yuXI)>(-``g&8!_VZpsum944;$lF6m()SLhA zHO$hy7oJ7u>MmV}tcgi*Dw^0=UP6cu{O|DJ<1X9B!~Omrx$otoK>#t8K+L zHv*3o>t6pc?g~$Bee7UX@c|^a+Td^ES!D$RkWM2cAKbxstoG`uJZ_T2a7eoT4_=jz z9dd5#4U~5DOqE=Vsb4ga$|cCIEaVABZ!VWon;=YlZsCov&T{9cj!Df@Rvlat(=;3S zpnYa`4oCQmPhQ=+}PmYM%)IwzpQ%4Xa3XaKPB6uPHK%Hrq0 z9}kHJr5scPTMCGb%~aN#cM&grd^qC6R*}LRW{`XsF%?dOkMktdUYECzJ) z%uCSd$E1V?YigUJs%{@=dAgyJKH}gq)G#=O&VqYHUA+0kaG9?mg^r)GLP+ZNSc@a+ zw$NU9d0F60k9km0Ba;vl%AjFzPNS&sJ0<&Pc=ze8d&_jxscNEt8~;M+0|_n`_M(b* zm#4#NXbk>JTP0Dm;#$N{6!BslAi8o_BH%XBn0O}})5~*(N6{d0<%>G`#*6OfD3^Nb z#^Br0D^Xr3n$z2YsDJkqsXhop)&4^`G$OaE?qHMtCbr?++%0jILCN^w;#OH7sH^Qe zpMw`0TlCA_p0N>l)#+M!pn-Ch+Z8#;8#UQsEeTtG5&Wj`zf&;JDI^5d3@Fv-$POTJ|C;#ZL#>>4x+*yi>etj;T zON!mgSPg&P-NYt?CZX?6NNFDF?5$Uxj!)l%XkrR&`=f|K#U9imY_CqYIQ(RNSTs-Y zFv-YYP|2AZBfq{rCW_Fy}F0 z5$e?E+%BlhN%OAeq`O#}8eegwmQZBWj$FYlc)_Aqk|ArR1{iw)w)SZPvgq!xp(^`c z-kYpzv%xi)FZ(~tEX)iM5P%oI0m)D+-xa$*YN~V!QUS&eN{jn_C25}INm2o(=!bDY~6IDtG`Ksq_mmTFfJW%C1~$C#$_=LV$tAUOqxE# z&XFS(Ooe0U(xRdLC_GtcfmOpWg@rE^mdK|X_&?6J`l2LN#V{J~i^|5sq;%TrtSKrG z*i&E=W$Lf1$4elOTNx$;h_x-)Yq)u#Uq%Jdxu3$QI3t>O=UEJ&yTwHr_frVH8fw{3LdPi&dO5J8IK%^v%P$QBm3K8Y9om}XT=#$Oo>s{4o>y<^vzTh> zb*p1KD?6c`);?0SHB)6sqFvn-9vU*#ky=v(`V|JMNyVf78SA}JOSO|@M|z~t^!!o2 z_YNM)~G&Ha{Zek(%Bd-?F1ls;vwluW+tF6O}ZL%oSh$}SrzIV`sX^zRRrSnWQDG0m;gWxw16uo+JM^Yk6;ECC0|_o(s~WZY*{-2bs> z*tirM<0~~67I)P_N14J1cMp3aq(XbY@k0ipWW-pe9kngB?0FY@UVx6&oK+qgAF&`vSoS#E3ZsYx8GdBqR{{&Mw?F##^)vGBP+78Y<)ov(AE z-)A5v;R~t~RV&?Q^|Lgfrb_NpH(+X(K%pE~nh`8c+0HD^@gwuNd!0F))GaZK9X z-e*uj#-jWqbj5phx^uY)Su2IN`?d6Bl+aU4Qy&0O4_13xg_`eN8|RnR^txtACFiyj zDye;PwLjFo;u);$GU?5IjAC#{xF(J4<*wX!>3Wr5qaL_B%b07bGhsh^$tiD(Ck^-h z^ky^{1FKJiIMH_Sy5iJc?;;)fffG;ng{Dn7C*39CB`=V+=st>@1iY5Y%RU64Vn~W( zI6d-;G__HKu-{@RvZ5`|p2)J8-rda@kBHf=94<8TBD$ zvr!peksFyPTNy@-(b)BR?ea{nGN?*6=q95a*5}Ip%~0i1HNYxXr4u&ow1OBq8QE$- zC*UwNHn|}0!9l|c=dU8Zd|&sk9uwddbE~0reGFVT)PyT zkARO30~Fnf=0F=6qf6V!|HW(zc0BzNjuf1(d?UT+#btaKD+6xVU?dqS;mdO&yL;Yz z7!WlT*LS%`r&<5lyUi~-sOFt&QsR!mnrKO5VMuZ+b3pAS2I&|j>qKf#=_%tvlXBy9 z$oHbGskzhb+gbzkC=C$dSZTP#{F3b|XdafAr#}wz`6g1~uAi`L&!wrw`v}eq6@5sJ zFXQz+)<&}FntG#iB0n>Ex%#c!t|R42uQf*ItiR+I(3xoh)L47Ekjck|k)=WaY|V*8 z*B7y%9)pSe#-iKJ5<06cr27}=J5lbRCn;F;daco!ESGS?%<_b1aKXLwY;8*Guh|_r z)eWaj{>ta`$t`jj%mI%-^9EjCX*r{`RXjEwy|oNo966%ar6=J?+>aN&{Dfv%8%9KF zmenW>%9$vXKM>|@B4abBL@-Z(*J=HB>yk&eDDyEcpUncY!^c$7B)j$k9#$!IG_RHy zGd6G|CWIXxd2Wi5sa~A^@M3e1S?L+O1=d5ybdmq@mYScZo9h-G`Ft6uCHZsOfB&`tG-5FSD;9j zGaAi4$14?4988)GOOmaPP)tIu#Hc9}+|&*HB!(lY$IN;D{!Kr-=b@yEXF|pB!&$=2 zVo|gFx5+dkl#T0$J_Y~>356YUA^uVLArhQ(zv}I-^90Ucc{F+|dFXOhqd&6OU=;bT z7JXjj@e1Ps|L&&kmKw5UMWr&$ZLO0*NV^I8t2#yE@yTY104?N0g`WfH1U<3V0&`zD zSuvz&raUYy-8LOrqca(Z99T)SJODTc7+?Wx%Cs5_p%m__SgQ8k@}7oRIPvnV)tE0s zzOhu`%FSQ&1|_ty%V|#)rh({f&IbbcINKq?RY4z<#ka)JH4_^SiwYk+vqb&oM|b)? zc0CaUobeZ+rea|1iK&Bc4hPhr>O35+SZs=mu2-ke8K3J0RHabX<;YZ@^AP~2CX#B+ zqBWEBQH7RTiT&>~f-kqm-P{*j7Gu#|4ZK*d9P@0iwI5|{cLPP%B<%7~kIFUz^cqfYy)7hV8mL3z9&z0~RUCU&+Dj$Bm;8?1 zRlAS;@9;Z&>nA_{EB#5h#qzUzBI0|09`4Qme9BP&ox`tvVG!d{jQ%iUqXQY)E48sz zNS)~eM}$S8)`}RBiP;GTQ4^Urb0ut#DpVn>NG-^HW=QgLsAwjn#LOYlIG)J8Wn!pR zjEfO{%Tw6C*g$BWJ9nv}O{qLj0JVuFy>PynWF#;r*!h?-@DWi;pfJNiWuYkXK=d(0 zs@vcV0YSeOi$W3pb|GpeJnwPQW`B09kA3yRAo0OzQVGGVq5B@*1fq(5db@Q?Y49PN z!;7h{8vt2*aNaQ50H}c%LsQDZn6gu&cTD632&KI6-jq6_4OSpZKUE%H&`XmWApApx zPYl({)rUkE&*wdfPo@OzbdnM-dLRdoy#f%X{*ciAq#v!q0;HaBi^;+1$A87qo#D{5 zkPCw`?S#L7QMkJ~xs6%MCbG}x?FA5d%klt!075{$zr9yt!R(Xk7RaQ!qAFJ^y|i)# zVZA54Ao*~fU6-n-YKAVuc;grE@xHFtHR!GxgUnt9n^|f~<6W4XR2PTzvdKDmrj)Yy z$hRma;j-uL$my~ad9c^A#oTw^Ph+;qYi(IXD_USjF;uSP8Nb<7(#O#L4+oW@aB`>e zhKPtZ^ha<~_nz7ZWHLx5(OY7ExmN*|*5CnKAyLxSUrDXoqha--Ad0S1!VA^xqB>UB z47MJZj(S`U3HlG?GGa>dKKTRX>GC||j8_IkIb~X&-IWyt%Rj&C%4w^X`NFgf_V$U`YCC+Pag=X-a z@u3-`E2_H#84uUNIC=I){##L$eRKz;m*zDhRc|t+>Cf>l^c84#qQk=Z%X|^o&h(_~44&UFFkbg&U0K zSK0c6?l?A$N3x)-9qsM4ec8j%52-VXQ-Nu1xK+d87jY+sCnP|{a% zp|Ta*5Rz`Ho{(@61diTgvVwIGNfw_k*=SW-rR2;-w<7Gqo!c)iY=8TPrcKzAA>+0< z8Jl-kE3G=RYAI%U=y!zDq7i*2owA+RvHE?U2bfu^gg%5$R$Dd84oCh!00030|LlEB zj~vIf=3gmjF%W?wFKJn}MZpqmO1jnz{kWElSqjlv+0{v9WtQ{NCcX0ZuDzWBE(QZw zx(4QMyz@>C{}KO^iSIk-#3QSk6vggnHtmfqc2`wbW=5PikMFT~A~$F-A&%V)E9SI# zBacG!7&Zf~uk+8@_RBA+$E3hN4SBJDqHwwphGG=;9@P{|7@n}%`0d=(^Lq8uzV#`= z_+_(ReeM&l^SbMOlJVI2B57C$qjyu76Io}x}&>3dNCS~ zuV`8^`i~2442NKV(!-XQ(rSP8tFNCTVQqGi_8SH6*a1)Fy$emDYaLY_RMJsUjEv$T zxB!vN>#Gf{v22SFo#&`Pbv{QJR*JL>oWfwrmI~jkk1PoccF5*L6I*JzBqbh2b7_ov zmHxlqm-QcZ?CQVy`s@94+qMy?l6&{js=}F|vj3M4`!lw+W}{hd5(G;ryAo>=ZJP(a zV(z3ADO(+7IiUNF0hTXG8px6Bx3|cmgQSptTbfHAj<~Fzp>W_IWwBUKD#eRNczSUg zUv2VGhs-1RS`wXYxg_6@sj%P6Bl3CILb=zPixml>XCPiLTvc^Por4F8fnH1_j!r}Nx9fV<@ z!($^VE#%=@x+|Q=$m`t2pEQ*F7%@tlkR;*I6AVcUwMhfVAIF=fH32hF)q9yjtsKnf z*u&{i)sLg>{8`*!ElyaG%5S^2;F3yypea(#O1mGUgA-3$U)vv)_WBY2plmQhoO-gP z1=7aTGH1`l()8Zy=W?o6v|sOJ)@CaBCq9rMeZJHhNu?sPSzHv#*LV|dB{(HOzxujY zr_XUbhZ}|E?BCSJiKr13B{HbC5br5eo?7k=^?4>}miS+;2|j0?s0Ujnef$e}-x!aR zBYhXXLl1%x&$8@{?yg^rgWDd%AO@-H>tVWmuujFax3l)Aluobkf`2Gq;g6@#1vIvTL=!U`8~Bi&H+N>;8_FVS@yk5w z1!`GWe%F2M8MiA z|G`J|YVYGb)5P=Wk8+*e|KvHAV%}uk?ug|Foofuj@unKzW(cD7L7A-xXC0In;-Xp< z%hm)O>z2i=MP|;vIUaYNYoBS}PKYneT-euA&xy2SN-(=i8wyJU5Hrr0C<~`N);j5@ zX|uv`uGaI!0+?x?8X@BfATmUHf}-c?kNSEkIgRy$elK-HiXQgb*%aT;X#7;BrAz?D zP@5n?ecZA()kMssSH!3=s!a0vJw^9niFbLV9Ub-)thVzB&J#4FA#ZC_mf(kg=b5O@ zwYgZMtV{KUJjevy>8al>{9CB^&gPvc?)#7I`tEM{H-2dqYp`cjlR4;di)U8XfQ|2} zF!g7HJ1l%nPW`o-c6l-&&&5v-VZJ_Cm>U(goc)D6H9%@r?wOE(?eOKpXY29EYo$9e zE@ADOzWY*{3!IFHdg1;VoBfJcQuT-wqa^nk&qw-ei`7!|o|6;=O9X518#f?DhU9d* zObniXPW$WYRN7~q1FilMIxmk*UbQ)ypdp3x>ep9ER92bmge;OZ_Uja?{Th@XUh$;yX+7n7_pK8e=4=XZwm^zbgTPL__&+i>FvME9#f^i9Hs=2-I8)|2k~SJivbU;lTgmi0I_50Kw+g4;UnIs+aH0~BlkOaA7AV3yUZ=7NOV#* zJi|Cea3qeKyZ6qY6{mGXA%)D#bu0u0D<${7Ec-fop=u4;4**=ST+GxZO58?mUXAmK z64V9tkx!2!$@%&f!Xg?cf$)^sk-Bu0f0iQ2+X5G!d6&b>aepRIm7*8lbWeKms#`@^ zj3s>6`{0G>#9N;gN27LA3hjr)FE?!xBM}qz2kS_0Fq~vY5ZX{`v#W7@q4GvHtLwVC zwFYm>-&*3w6#KU%Hzocp!7+i}Tpe22itMySJ4%08F_3SVSt{}es)Q0oY8V|~B&hr* zPQRhvx?zK(J($UkYBx7hupvP0q*-T_OgT`kvz|i>trLi$x;#j+l|u=xDY`Ge&nYN_ zLWt&bf{smW=SrJg9*0Z^hmG>7ek2XpT`yJR`Wg{~B5}Yqf;gMr8}^?qUq6Orj$l(m zgvOIH#hk~E7)cbTj$&;i2mNSL95=734PvIlh=S|GdQXWQQkfA<^p*!AHvsFfFfwhJ zBpV=vSDGV!TMx+-V=r!Pzt^!}o%n!d{S|-SoT!NzjkA2w*Y?lSm!~7ae3UWHzD^m{ zm3Zh+W`a&7peso-7+Baaa$GBx2as3$7tP0%Vv%lA1{o1#ujQ|WpI6n9nc zZwW-G?)t@5Hn;7Et?LqHgH1AD$;ky}lA5wtpV0*l$B8%6&MSKdLS-}L6FJ6NOm=ku zzsZuLHw+MR^_kA&a+r={H0H=-Ola`y;0KMP5}aN^;FV{(*V9=)7Vil~wX%Yjdj7XR z&WX}QF%001T&&yg>-G>6P_Wf9)ZicvqL~pvH^rfNNvk1pSp2_lH z^VoqJGYnDJ2FOX!JmgVVE;)q!*K9T}WcPvHr<4dLi~=!0 zorpxNXNuZkl62a0_&rjX3L26i5a9vRrTtm?W=UZV+Mcb z_T_tRf|t2_3B!>GWWN(+$NbKicI0l6dO`k%}0AhSd@S7P%k z1At&Njr9||x1&2Ym=RdAsz{HeB%9JZllzyaUGMWFJnv%7A>#EALy?$_^{fzNe47TR z<5<5)dFEC^$~c#LaL&CKu(L`cobq9<7flYYj>eGfPJ~X2de;? zAOZ%4I=2h#0;=<94?X#*Q>go-x29}U*T&bZpc5X$>(Ib{^(BxCvtDOc`lhaMfJ(NA zV%@+9!bn2E3!l}fxO8vB2a&X*=Ns%K0EP%^=U`0`!=XD(T zQ{GhWYj8!vKi8`Md!Xc}~2+kK&<}RSRW7=|68-y`%YS$@$vjQ78 zh)DYHv6a7&lYd5Sw(A9ESH6@EpUFMIB~is+?; znA)_flL0q~dA{ibq%=$16mts@O04Sl#^?e)+XOYG+T(?Ss<50lI4Egw@e<$0SaH_@`eg=qs3RacITK zPmsh73g)e{?-E>g*G5bPW#kmAxl;Lre$H%%R#NKBqS3(`9zQ`>iMk$&`SaCSkH2?s z^_aM2S?(c7P2{%WgkLVJdm4O=dKt5Yw8_5^1i`#lR1 zasXKFO`SB8Lx_t5@#)En&Ev23;7guxqJ+31e-mCxhx}Eaa_9`l$2~tSQul&$ zJoI~A@qYibm@{Y(*TS+X$fhQ(EHt7K}D2>qB|Ds50<{{9eVjDl8lho5t1UI|Jq{g zW!=L^3d}eCA(g%mvLgD3R7jsm#?Vbu^dL%Pd5jqlyseQDlvyLx3AGLul5-yT3t6!^ zUsAyvf8{-E5|cLYHKS%7A607OwQBB^%(5Pt zaJbLre>?Y$6hD=Q33Ykk5kE~1(-9{{dnj^P7}hGw3*>UIjvVDPur$p%mDUW>0cvLO zbR^dD8fN#=UoWAC*GoOGH0O#i1}!*KhT#j_SCV(Vcu8Q5ZJ(^30V>&C{`q*A3N;EUFb5j@DRoY zX$FgEGx|Et{=lw|oeGCHox4hQS3tO}6G8wxF(h0A9zTcsBu=F0G~AxRtSHu2HPU@? zKTYDpyQFA`$!qFprjj-MpSnAx6A{-uqL1IL((jUlS&gR)=A%263P_t^SH5ClLLnRp zEdf{NFr^VHydWu;fFxn z#xK73b$zPe;fpW6_`I(kJb3W^`#=2R!Too?|APlVdhfj->SELn`ncP~kNKCE*hRLa zzfEL#=ia*vwZFbR?>U*N1q3jRn&{oO;k>aKl!TL$^Wsa&Prfjho9O^RYrZN6`((SAaR5 zATqU0k9b9HSu^#|e5lp=WT&7bS_SHuVGA2E8)&ePs2M~|PHQTjIaR-ggkddRKZ=>` z#DYVnVxmpNzpZxOW1tCP0P=(oRx|1&?vosRh+vNQR=@H^$i#CVA9UtZVoH=C>u8nr zl8x^2bx&<`wjj}DP}TX$U!~lmb*5;M#xu9+$5A9AlNscJ(t-cZZL_Jz(C)JIA|ycU zOYePn)M16bE>l!Jz?hCuNP{>ZWjc7%;g!3Y*CHwDF9o95mIl45@LtIr=CL!omqZSWlx4`*l`IKD4{sH94zKu4?sik73t&Hh5IQDiiLQBW=V(!FRo z`6Wad6SdmmI+HvdlU|?7)I*r4=4u`q-n3mO5Q$o*f5|!DOiO@5rtuL~1OfUe_b|{E z#@?kvjYnlky8JV-< z3KUt(Bf%g%TsKuEZA1-azQU-FfmTOa&#Set^`(NZ`?QA+(AY*1BLU5thN(Q@L? z88?e*R93(mAbMXbF^P5P$nOh4qc9aUIh!N zuTIpYX4%0dh6h#Gppq!2PM1pm=?ANp+~V`qezGwWoU9Qn%p4Zv3JJ^EHA{+B^v%KR z&qZW-+x92!Rqf1gbkHY~=CshHuwT`bMJ41OmDVWTT)vyjq+3)!L2-ln3B^MV2@~YD zik3)qPW)@4lP308dcKJ+m}$!-VL8efS!d&z(@iS-uS!26^P#p=vhVa?28LJJAwh78 zeZ{%3Y|TWgTEx)tu&e$h6?3V*-*mT<;zxBNzy@NN5XvZg? ze&f&YBcXi{8?zr4>?xn*0#cr&5sGyeFmrvED;b+zTBZDFpyFFoYYAVZN5E(T@0+xc zwrr5>+@anP;XAFcVzg41F4X_5Pq5|whtI2PvKxNp@2&_!g7B=usi6E_>g&{2K z*ie*z@u{EmbLIRgix2#%4~3fsHi6<`V{trK23Q+8KUc>b1HYuayj?%N=j&BMAN<+w z+ARcR&vtUn=!|zwP)35Z2tE~O^D8E`Z_0)#lvjN0^EUD;;=I`n!^MA2vON^uV#akZ z<4p9b2M|>Ge7d$NB&C+r0uy(uG-5=I!u;1BwQlyi=P?eyi8~jhmuA~hUterge7@sv zU(zy#Sig2$%?8vZ6C{f$NYeeG3rKil{1!AeYx?3P`<)4JGn&uqvE)8gAcTy#>W|gc zS=Yz5)7YeiQ94pF8Xupz5!;W>OM-RWKR0c;P5TSAGa3N#6I_TJv^E8I|3*Oko4PD; z+sL0#wmR@n=+s8lX$9#wmfwX;&QjpgCRK;=AM$Gl@6)f4!T!9TecgyReD3_N>j3Fk zl;1e}E4CQiw(kgcQp)0pEgKL_i@_oV0&z$#p>HzKnVO*<^ccVRQ%~IT1Vo9bPi3ua z2lXU8`&mHi>DSYkA@5p#_0B$so&JAr-l8Y&Y18R>t6slDanNl#hfn)ig}6_LjXmU~ z&3N`@Lp$Zi4jun~kn9-C+zCf&^-=x1`WbfRXa3~eqWq-AG!EB{y6OLYyjz{r(FG5sFIh3hM(vEc~_2sUddu$<_h5lnI?2k!w{CO~F~ml92{PcEZ_PJg~I4gmx%YXGI(7-7nWj#2z|eTPr}p9DKBB7O-ZQV`Xp8epwKlW64F4 zNjn4#AUp;J2L``4Gd4SZ9mbZBhvM$43<#&(B!qvs`ZpnpX{4n#h(C$7bTBl>62u`Y za38Kdp0o*Z-YiE9$6;VygOSVNMx;HEPH&j$j3Eo!HNm$rOw>LsGBmZueefI#i~N|R zLB)=>ODJ?R^2KRY4b-UTw%F9xlP=4K_up-fE;CwhLg*}+@$w9vzdKg=o#*6~5l8$S ztneb?yPu?c_n*7tkD`g+eLkA_z3>0R-k;eBPFhBZfIvov7O=cjW zuX$4;=7YJ*&#d!)hA3LI;~DoRW00MKXKmJOY=hPLoCqUGbtetyagQGEslf=++s0^u z1XBiJ)Gnd|%4rkD>V1mVSMJ2Whr_KLhP27Vh>XN@q?1j~w7pb$afbOwg!Y)33#uIT zu-}D3Y>y2sA5~5;Vb}h-O!#%mo^ZmS%tNyY^F;(u^eo9_0u6?LI~690`6X1VPDaYO z zks50Wd1^MtSe&2-SCc0HsCGH)hk%y6I6=!+{l>@a^p_!)7?arM5wd=9>#WZ)tJoO= z@?KrYYZZZltW;Ag|8jgbP8VOv+yQ(A<+I7UEVgRWpcoJjrOb0A25%X~U!b#kwO3s~ z^$!$nSvlBsnFN1qbB_Lhti$020gt+*kHKJ@6qtK$uKXfaj2;IZSF!8kMTc&|ogC>k*7Nvz0}U*FOSj z6i%yDs1R}#+E(!Kxm-iaZOwhEDPuK)bLQ=DeSKG9vgOWNpFg0p^sn{V#s8hlC^Fv> zeZc7PCDvmBAjeo7hI9cV!tQ%dR{}Vh(d{?-C;vqjr$0PJ3}y_R?{ZKDxAK44HnZ(6 znbEJ*D%zCjH}$y_G;dVF(p1p^OC#96JQlTDS4V;Q(+F z@<|owO1s_(Fp1fhq;|r|jY_i2n{6hsH)(!8y9Mr}*h=~t*0o^0%8V9-YKUg6s4NVF z8x^8rpr5q*jzegbB*W;zNBg@`VE64^FSz?eB{md6{$F>jta1@YzB+4AucIANCysdQ zIE_Ii!O=M0cMem{aB|Ai=L?dYca2=x$W+&z(q7)&`qyFZHn^HHk5f|r)Wbn2ywp(@ zS&P8SiO&^VMACnG<_fLwNm8g1s_f>L0Vyhf?wg!K`S4I`@a!Aw>I z;2nsdbIG!j+5tG?8bNRD3=vZGXL94}j1--UMdhmK+?Q2t7hQHDdhV)OBEbRh zUF8CR&^r_{QrMZ;R$lQbh9yY-o5l_X=%4ZskOKgXRF`N#r{!^aEZm;s5G1L}8i1Lu zcLg2`24lP0R+77%W-8i?2}t6`8vfaAFQ0#f;huP;5Yg6bO;?f!&pA6GL5MSmT|@?# zJ?{^%VDY^y5A)w<>LU=Db(h?Exg@Q3_F%1=!pJcA=TwI?ENKBLf8XzSAMxOqvQUni z8RV{Lg!!F@7nfn1q;Nu62g4;f#BXq!`Q5O&8`f1AkPP*X#CUDE#9?NfV`>zUW?U5x z7c}yD#(sEf0?0>3D?P6pU1nziQH<)IT_}L|VU84-EYvjgi8c+jFc>eVBeJFNQC)noU&BA5F1gZF;$;Er4|pY3)w0Z41r?+2fIP%7wc zywSAz0gYp@8t+gLQeQnn7;>YpxAJ>5%O^(?pHm!D2$bMrMXma9T0cPxu|r zI3J=1`)(g9l{&RO+Nd(rI2k6P5iyye4Th^YL%XdDCbQQiU44r>ULQ5+ODQ%`p&FG$ zP>d}6KU&P+jq$U{nPVNVQf%wgfY;#uyv<*2Vk(_t;Y^*q?C>wPamo&VALsWkMOUQi z8#ir$8>0@IrjC(_dWg3; zp*!l{mFj%ZTwA~rGl57^b436lIbpZyC{ss>(CvvPhKEsU_g@JvC9-@=XS<)7E6u-8 zWqe##Z-4LpgYVs03pH}vxsVc?Op3b8jS-%fE)p6MwFMJM9FwD|sj)W*)QN+M5Axe# z5I3|moiHW9SuIOgaTf}oQ8gw9zpPgRUb@?~>l79UxC|Q|0ygP=UL}Tmi5AaugU7e; z1&n9F+@3bA|M4fE{OJCD;(z%nA(k!f{5OC8`yc)*)D74*B7ZYsBu%e+E(K*)Q2n)+ zf5z{=UMMQ(pArZz9fnXz8^J!we}QlQTIR`pN^wXav_;y3M;OjVb(V<~xo z;#LQo1dzN`_zI-5H}Gm%v||_>U0{E3YmgL+UO_dwaSb$xGYlO z&{Bjih=JW(S)SC2kn6JhQb{1%%ut0!5jH1Z~9N$LRcap|S zN|GQT*E)oa0}#Uo;;%HKHgO)`8Y7GHOwaA3<@@p47p$k-lg27cPjtXxt}yGF(F*)5 zY1@yBXE2IMvVY%6-J;9Go0n=>JY3PPr*j}xZRe&sqv;6lYcr}GBRelmo0`26!)!(> z+E-(OFy5^i!6>z65!4qJ?82(M8%)g@rfFNY@A9L9*&1mx?eOh>Vb^L5y{~UM9NYYTTHAH1N4gCvmp&2|gMp#o?=l zeUq zFsds8kwTiAY)ratiESXoOxD)OGDAD?k|yyoFxpr)f{l11{ta`n+H>``KI5Wy_p`{o zx+c|kzn;E#|Nc8yA;es&JGig~AmV}fx?pKb4gf9#XBAnI&d8)An4Rdvn8nTW^%h?E z$!$c&mAH_S4{QUdod}Jjo_}SsD<2Nef%GI=o-F4{FsN1v_^-n5q^;*L*b$p_=qS_z z{9Y(To9Z=Tu?cLsyw|hqdZ0x`SGE@xOR9^|UeZ0+7M=f4nxO?uO8Ak) z-J_Z3h(H}^(IAhYKI8?1!v$f7Vq+{3?-sWv+iY!#Uim@!StIs{T=0f+l0y>* zp0zn-htk1NPe)S_6p;wd6!n~-!<#=nF8*Zl!R}LSzXbw6;x!M&v~&C}np9 zm95FEGTm=xKlO0&r@-0p8_pO~iW5w|zY#;B-j^NKx92eaNFPH|~pf<^n~J2^x|tYj6}|;vhYNUlA%Ff-ipAnO~zbR&8mEp%7R2` z1^U7x&37k0XPXVv;om$AT2G}h1hU6-S#i3*|KWcj@A7#cSFZ#v36X#Q!~ZVx9Mtf= z64LPUKAd?~UlNEayFp|evQ z3~;RKR0dRpmnEvzFdReV3*1IQNaHwL2g24`>PflD(~en{AMk7XBJS^LaCFZ*EHdjqFok}CJ}v>0bbGsgV&Du^8^yan4!oM zxd{-hkQqWq;UxglS2S6Ae0XiF(*4^2XBw0435xN6){59}MY@EDpwyOvgQEysE_nAI z6DVB8-FW3=qX+N(=m&Rv+K@{^w*j$mP@RPp_Qdg|7tF656Ok`euiPGI=!Q>w1ja3a zuHmur76*~Jb?A1SQCde8NPQWj@n}Rk-gG4S-J)|h$G{hhU_S?vs9il8`rnt*juOSl z^91BBYD2PleQHc3kf0osnT=13tzT*i3i%-1Z}Eq=9_O8rWj2v3x)4+KOE2iCAqWP* zh6$&Z7M8c%35DnH`%b$=y;(Q#U`6~cW(5vSDyUM7+DY~&2gtEVK(yDr^(p(FJ!hfK zqL>-|1|1glHCsvQ2-*0|8af@S3mPbto{) z415zx|Ab2z`cJ$MQXv$|g7V-Yrf9&FMx)huI+mO4v=@JoBiJ7ZA{(X}1;vo`9A+g+ zc$)KcP5B)@)H-g_$k%jfwo|@dDR$u;w2t$Wx(uJHFKGM6OOqn)s(bjiCVTm`U9p+f z&^p`4b_AV*^vZ=BU|`J=f!>6MY_8s3W{ZiqwIij#w5H1)U8?ORHc$R;h!hO8(MmCy zCyyu_*Nw3^IMvH=YcL7#1HqpJ+$1*7p zKGNKUzK@zZ6&2JQ1(Hy*npzfgiZk{oo*%&sZb1x8X^dVGunF?Qo4RPp z>-SFQciU5yUuA?kXX3e>1uQ4e>(I;~N2|_=7>d|={&?DcGPj;SoBO3 zdLzdIWiVuItrAmQ!Liz~h`1BVcSqw^LYDldVwfv-Pd;un)<-ZX0XCYA%QOEulii?BMCP9bp4sadr7vmKCo@M72#1mrNA1^t($7A5Z_9L37;Hy6V(^p| z6mv#r1`n+9hefB_ir@NvT!~uGc@0qIfc3Wbxm1xc1_ok3eD{vncIn7UwH1VoAdoLN zCX_hS?c>~El>k!vtHMmCW;+j2wlXaNGi|{_hrjj*$5_$lwg}?h((G~2Ll@R`14Qe~ zB*`BZ9uC;d=HPJE>AOHd#+0kFuYDMl?0R$6bK2(%>5R0GYNj~q3g~xIe0^;ltqu!o z>qVW7BI`}GJo=L-^_0nkFsj>^e!jb~Y^Em{2Sm4YAN=vzCME1eS2wtQsY0!=81GM^g!W|K z*2BHk$K&W4!;KA?qO|^3=%$q#3PP#({)0Pm)HJR1e+ol3Thm4#HUF(C12H;ZFYI*R zZ_?3B;IfobEKgJ`ZCaDiNGK>(u&|VMk`{SBp(!(RCmnEsOwlAbuG^!t#U@d`EsatG zA=eq|)IY5zj4UG@J5fSj>dqG`f1(J8uul?%LfxqWwN+<{VooqC7f`Bv`SV_EUBf1oL{=^Hk6eBL-u;jLghasL@%wAcemME`B}yXNeS12a}3)>Z@;LE!P45{#A; zloH<#WH~Vuk&aUkt0`Bmivs^@??aQ!3X4R-hmqh|?ov(W;SDQA5y?R}eDki%Z&TC0 zT{7F#32l)Ti?b(`yo%n4sI|IFQ89+Z6KKlqX(~#_rfIX!?^SBD)bl?6t;l>?#3hJ!AR93p)jpID1 zU;}fGDg~B`7F*DJt{x>HYs|C69%$LqowN8?k;3-x(3&>^m zqJdIcG`U%(4OtWY%A07F!oYMiC@E6#34&mb_VuNIrkXv1(2WS3+Y@#$)30Gj(55&zX13BtpMoEsQQx#BkI;0ST#sT{SEw9g4hrZHH znQHe|w6vBsH(#J8pfornUog-f!Ij`=PUH+ zg849Svuin6Pt1n|wd`+R4~1{jI+wSM^WKENL>hYez63{MZW>bWUwkdPKLzo1&@GUb zL&i>7sVRNZ_X)1wK_%w(YtCQ!VGzdnfM*BacL*6TJ>O;B)#Qc~+@-rqITgYUliTvBu9t%Lg>R5(8hiGUIMFZGlPYuZ;^%3}M&p&q78@!8GQ+zB?9 zH+PZ#q_MJNaU(PJbL4wOhKZ`CYJZ3z`S^@l*ptdyLnSDe-=}g$c&-h4DwkxwkzWV&)+gA1f0dw47LaC(OJJbGN{4 zt^6AG?=0w3AJom<=DhBt02RAYEbJ@a>I4YkxZq&{|2H&WW-4H68O39^*!5e%wrkj8 zg;0<@A>*6SyO5jQhvzH4ANBkcx4=gRYFP)}b16$mB>{u9@7RW80-lNPFAexpk3)t1BB_(#2FUH@4~`iod|-e1QB`_oBpY5 zVLVBlgh-$PN~FeqMOL4+J_`=xc74;0CWfwzL=U1Dr!ZkdejmO)lonG37pt%l-v0cK-QSD{?d ze}vO?A+Q#(8*H0QZi}3KvK|i6o$whk@z7|3HC+4!IX&fQ)sN zE1f9is1(yB!rQ^-wB%4K0t;wb>{D~Q2`b4P{R^&o^DTkT!Pj( zGHw&Csj3p^0=1VZ0eWCmVcD zwpf#;;*|~1d^AOmx5*U`l+z2O4**u^Qsg~{Rn@w2j7LIAZQp=-Z%rzK=n8AOC4yyf z8dhe_QDmm>qMeLWmF9)M#j(y{9VVPd;+GHMr?bf-=;81%U`RMQv;LJRR_^+Z^ih_A z8b^a;1$^yrBOb09F*XW<9LQQ<`56I~H$l}LegoVaLB=WOM<)kY@Fi|y_W$N;C;nt! z;kngOi$!IEh>qo|rn>>E!U>LW4>ShZ|$gS zSOH!lS+kD0Rgi}QgpIX5GqgpUI0D$O)S$=zmk4(RWplWv5VImUmNv6`5bA72WzXAM3`QHOJv6>*MmggD)+!>*Of& zYxd&n6Jou(PVVYtc*8I2cEsPrZvyU6CVlFrmr2g~?{mf>qL>kktH=INiqCCN=K=q8 z=7E=$A5tPnu@VD;Q%9I!VysQ7Kw+VnzBuDA6& zZ1vMdP^mcvPFf>yRU6@(97M#HixwPYztJi!!?{+G<|hTN@Q4cb2)JZmDCu{)#r*h1 zaxD*z9)p+%L1rS$q3B5YhX_Lv`aFiv7;QonX(d<%zjaILlo%*Dz!~Ep*<|2AbfikQ zCd=zAThvP^TMM;0wjzkn0gV9Am;GKeLrQsch%UO&YEDIwCDC^p1!MxPks%vmJ0{Wo z?C>YKzfaoJXw^Y)~s&9-K*rP#&#E8Y8yDs?5xArEihHG}CTF*g7W!mg3UedP#W z_Stmy+SQ4w2G%`G)KU1&(jW|S>*!dD&b7~E)`CWMK3~Cqb5C#JkRktIEI8MfiPF9N z_c@3lRIZtxn}MtHy#li}Z15Xcz6XA+R?so;JfKb>;n?|49LQgM;-lQ{Ife+y)pk%6 zG4uy=$As9|ZQ>Z%p-e8Rwh^o2Rp=8GIj-u0z@Mb9xcX6$V~f4($JH|^^8-jm>sEmv zZfLB>Q^+4}A`cYvDB{k7c!%2SxRJdF5e(M-IN`1VMJf7FvFJd7O0Pm~6rszJd?wka z_{34LY+@QQ8uH7>2pv+3wO>|f_+JWR-ac%{?t@+pD!-i^r%GQ4W;#0*s@5=GXNNZ% zU{65;3I%x_t4h~9$FT6hBc}8?3AUYq0>rVz z&7mKdms%s(QR1TKFCC33(PO*4jpECyP3oX!(yaxn`eYoi@OMx>&P^?Qk22mYY{!gF zUnZAX$c~BfHc`q7_?_SGu$W2p`M5su5D-_`}yDi=doziMFo)cUBw7|$)M z(;5r!N8G4(usQQ*LJ_uL-kq03KI0po!S5a2 zjyLaO(OLAxVgi4%zEYW}@{@T|?Fzp?!OZBb;LP%^PE#(zdPeA9nBc{#!r1pF;0xst zO+geWn%&WhgfrCoYD|n?{_9?40?tQ{^X}p+8WCb44jo6Rf%{}5@oC=FI%d)la5jjQ zdBd0wJtTWo>ziELM z*W@AX_80$Ioyp3TJS`oo<)u`pzf$>;1AGD%WzklJvo44cQx7gN8p}FXQGZ373DFd5 zs1rM^M9#zn9M|@1NSgG+rVc*{=l5kw`G?B0@>Mat-qjH}z)usaB6A>&-j#IQQ$Pcx zzIbP~{zOYWOkN-2)jOvP1x+wkC_-o&RRMTDJ@r*Ho&{du(-z^a=s<=TN&bqdjlY3+ z17CCqDg^v%XZ_IpKH#zKGQ z{|~00c#vd;7;yyI3^+JATu-6+frJJ2i!ezrC`#v-@}M3N(p-tdXWLrxuK*FWN{0== zAxS?b8%)?JdH>rtTL1Kkr{P9e~-^YDi1L413 zojYKVgFn>mS*O2-ceR`_Sb~9(KhEP`Rl9@rbb|0smxN_9IGOqxYfqXEs2Wu5Ai^!K zyN7vs1J``{*d1JSCeVxDNqh4p8WVf}(!4p5436^7L3a8d6CeHXI-A#*)HXOMd7`nZ zvt%)9X+`b-Bm}Qb0!Afq*BY=w(=)=yujHa$d>M$}rkpDhJ^uK(|jCdy77Jz0q2SqMiF z%N|ICVE1VyytsM*m4w9@UQs6ng@1)RwTu7o_AFF8nr$#j?pZ>`Ye~dArN&6ZRyn^hbZG zu+YTyns*-xMNCoEz&Yf}DKIcPJY#Nj?keuVwEJ~$^_wm%FoU2PATJ&mp-?jNgQ~8z z=qPnnKWKCA5@5OF4hDB~(G0mEVwjIv+$|Xi0}EIL9r%N9{^Moi&d+MMX}aw@@*TQ) zCogK+^VVMSz3{tFH}jI3{MP-q{J(tU947qt^J3ab-+#Gt!@N#TTFV)q@A`egB8=e(~V`yWju8gCD*3-VgPz z>IZ$yZ=xUbFW2&HZ@=dHWzKJ0Fa zsdw=QR;(gYV6>Fb!@azdk4LIDshNm%#@S;BLh{?E>={o~=TEy==YhvI(nocY-gxRy zw>Fo!T5aN}VAD(sIe-*2s|^q2LO9@0QF|wOTr%mNJ3Z1(@(k;9Z3Y@74$JS^Gx_@; z{tL>JvWOGAGhlH3_D2?bjL1ns8iddY^6TO(I+-o$MSJgG$) zOGHK|G*QX!reUUQppl9Yg2Fm3lcPQ|EIGhRfK4ZT5ZCoS=P&?j;%+SwFP+_49i9u9 zuaBJK0ZzI;$c+<~)sJQ7W8htevz-MbMlRyuh3mYKlT<35(0BKkzDKUhb1`L2#il)7R!apv2miHIL0}i1kD_gFaWgb9gJz!`oCAu#brI)- z=&(C!({v`_=FhEXzMwqcZ1>EH=I4yya>~1ik}q0nK8XVDPhG5H@`Fv&hI1jBNd~j8B)w)aMs)$)2uMX(zeG0cU169f^xa%e4C(}3__BO4 z$z?mAl2x`QAwPU@pI_^EX5f!Vk{ai#(lmY(TiWAF>~)1C4TZ&CSYuMNL^T5DSR!;6 zbFgADFD85OWG)lc%rMUOx|t6|e>Dtk%8ioKqN_++kR~L^3kic+J$Ua&_c3dqoaAF% zXy5uSyt>2OV@>osi4tigUF5F34A<_}ulC~KTdA3&ut(B|$xQ67_Ub=ahw5sUq`6g) zf?3CfF~YHuAZCYYI&yo`LVw5&^$8(18$*iv)2^!b3Ug2$44@>ZI;$FFhaxGOm`ogL zi;zsnd)qatR1z%=LZ>7Au16-{VDH%fA}U?;h`grd9@ zQ*c-&KA%THJ1J&u?u4#-)6h(F)wymT!sj%7ie0#MY0U7iHg(m=gPi@%PGalt9*$=iBAqs^f9WTm z{OJCD4z&2rs;%9Se%<2{_+>uf(ue=epMB1qR6SOg`K=N1K`>DuXw~=<#Q%H7mK8gx z?a-xsy4FMC!fmzg8OL#k}#T_jrrx3GuXzO0gFFu{;s?Zj7!H~ z%{PBty}jt0KWFKr71>MQ)9;ufz3g8>l$+`g@7$U*UAmrHB>MQ$H=@9*Byt)1oSr&= zV4(1n>^3>r$C|<>w{O-Q+vil(NWk@G<#)nG4wc z5W&+Mycg%qfsy@{rxzc06vPWRDMBN18xF#WLZ zu6(9^d#cDsMs`5mh>7W_#6dNRNGs-aj#6yRh4rsqlf2hH&)rdKt}E4QOZzvhTxy9LO-_#~<6q-Flv-P_v2>LN+^;!HtlGYkb3>jP4bQ#pH zbtVH-mZt8X=1D8-`UbkUQt#)}7Avl+v-)&x(LU1X<(ED)+qWVuoe*}A?uYh8DADqV zuujJ`X^}tH28OpOzfjrm`*M{%*ymT?A*`AI3bWm?)IOUI$Sty)?FKO=NxER`1#BY| zV^^*9<51`u{THiox0yid#HS9m^#cR*z-iui-5Q@Kj=qBg231)M|Dm`EB= zHojiYV#_TwBZseQYBmG5cSPy>1-e_;Ip{5|$aQlgZHv8rYu;_zRN3Gtne2+@$uGVk zzkKfe@YSyy$WBb3GiagmiPqZxoqQbWc`gb!*-XpL)jfoJ9IkcHZnkP|sh31Kv-#u+ z8@+TD2?srrJtFpvj9b4-xYqJ8R&~>96`OEMn{jJp}s6q(uQ*mK9pPHPZuiTa9jKJ zX-G1P0>zvU&@B3{0ew}ni$yeZI4eWXqf8?~p=Krfmt)_aI}+{sE!h%D$_}U-PCDQU&GZ0V!`uqA zn$W7n{VcY0R0MSt^`CT}t>V@l9l>z;H{I#rQl3PiVH0&(MxpadH||hZZX=C};PAzg z0s{Y)9biE)XGOmd@Y~c$Mu-ebYnareC@~sMT1=N-@V7a4km>%s@i|kwGN*eilZNNe z6Y%x@zNs2Atmqs{cpn=NHuX64$_r*i2PXAGFW;!xqaN>^T`^b0tqEAMAY>lIrWT$k zW0uJvyITA;YT23)oXNvHSJLN7#n^)_iTarN0rK9)^xiLD5>OL&L#fV(Sr%(i=j=p8 zhWB|Rnv&uJd*((rZ2VCf0AT{7dO9il9;J$+G%mhI4bqeTw}V^nc|u2!-ZXm*Xs^mX z;e9dh0qb8MP;xe;j4(?1pmp)5S?4TG+nRe}(>Vc%>%V;BhJus%MboiwB7non33b&` zzFX`K852pN8X7cv<)?3~hv`SpmtK^CWwUL%=$Yx`CNxrG$5%Y~uux8W@{SWu5rp}= z)c}_Q1Q@d@Xm$>tnYi1^q*^JyLsN+cE01{6Y6Y??1Kh;8GOI7(2C?c-PjS+Tx@ihh zB|QU|=MQWaaS8V#H6T4kqtiQK_1`)*nNTW_?BYc&&Yp%_`HW|5UN9q-WgHZJ0s~6+ zp{Z+FI5OQsJ*$F|h{=WWM`7}BKUEGP5)lE4DcA*rHTQ|30t>+Od5Z+$@Cj8Z2 zx*4VClNj+%ZjEs-#}O=`6wDBjepqa-8Z) z<9{3Vs-xuV?dfFc{r4qG$`zHQKE2|m!w2_PpEbuYBHi4!Hkndbh$?pv#N&~jpT2CBA-M_V((ox42?+AR2GCFLIei?#m_LGkugq| zz#YfP(8v1NlxElaFI0~aJ7ce``e82<8ugPht3~^V|FCD%+0LdrJde^-aH)vScUS7P z>Tfsn$f4 z2L4g#nT+WQMlUqkT4YggSnx9K*)o@vOjAqFkeI4kTn=)}(s&Tae$o@hYipnE_)CkNP7XifNEBQ| z_Sk}1HN@KeGeBBvA|cXCE!gd^!su_Ev?12%*->P0gv(BtnhI=SA*ccek)X*iZ=E`^ zhQCzt`^6x(*BPqz!RyjZ(+iBy$Jhixj&oK+2P}Yk&Hb9+U?}C3cAa#&8w$^vanS0_s4?c?Y=E@v~MXxi~ zUz&&`+d^JijC@!0a{Z?E7ia!q{)BLa>Q2GrSdT9;*E+rU8j*jk8tGPI1uKVQwxI_Q;%+R3eu``ols#S1^q|rP~Yc9=aeYSVc#8Qf2(Zri;In z=R~UhhP?->4MRrMY41yV@`=J5d-KVlC*(reaK+#}WfASEhX=ls&Xbliqm3AUxNWhF zkqY5^a*c`t$p&yW+sjB8hy0B)hl)DUHNq2)&$sKoZ}y*`93Etl-x)J z!&n?o36Qnvrr9i;q8Lt)9$>yQ4CwsR$ILLRuEV zI{EI!f852Pm);Zwz$}SdMd`-thWn9@n44I4$66u6wOlz?ZkYkV^sYe0(lYVhj2sJAFp{kY4ymc|eFf!2VaUknTKX0J11x3klq%?tfmJMfI_a_0vL3*<39c<#0lA| z*dqqh6>y9<>{O_r_NTm^B2A&=f8_rI00960?0w6QB-eT7s|2(dkU(}@O-ZIn!7?-? z4N+)Wv`AyTBThv|Wt~=JL@F-nDzCWp+FK7`%*I_ZU~Rb5td#JJ=t<^$|K(hwvPd?W z^;c(eHWE84t1=_vob%tl%R^);%>aYDY>s~VQ}m2N-`_g6X0G*QWo+j?ey^j-Z9TXF zPtnO`L^GdAG4iGs#ZhzcCGe|>mXG1|v5~l--gmMjPnBcCbw9>J*W8XqfGRrEOh_u3 z+F}ZCcHg5si)DvOE!apHFk#v3nlu9_&~1D23)W!>i#n@)rb~9h8iDV`-2sr!^K@_4o3z-;c z%8yKyX*#$g2RaTu(=(EJbWI#yPSTAZ)BBMz|_NnB6{6Vp5?^HlP)AdOdg~%%XuUCMnk; z1lFK-oqVUIDpJW7DnNN)_A`lZsBn5_JV)5^0pq@KMuwZ7 zD}JQFeFik&Z%1j5j&VXdsu*VryFMxh*A4QMJVncsv6QX7m>H)KRbAOmTi~tXkBudi z`iQ@VilCu%TZFGun0f`c;+bt>r0n|+xTSE z3#GkLT+URDhNN?FXIPVK8W!q~>Nh0Jg)|8t(}~1TD`^~%oQVY6sF|FNFFMaR>VD8s z!4BLZqp!s&TgNaV(92fN`Zp!Vmfw4KR~5`SqCAcQu5Lj~2>(W( z(JuriP=sVhU*y=W3w~h_o<)k#b znO`mKc=8+~YL1R5Q2-QsHOWiOV>nsl6X3I)8a@rW*Gg7iHl^lv(FrlnoN%y+9PzlhZ-uRDf6K7 z2ScC|eJrmwk*%<}KavRu1!Wd6WQxBl?$EYHd&aJ|9zsqD%j1PK%tEK;5!tvaGPCBd z$7z|_&4JEa*q8qd#=CH(PaetcNa}T{UwTQIe5`E3f5Ip!Y_CQYhPn|COC%n8rrDfN z)LRblC1YW0ZdsNpI3}&Ynv{wXOG{DvRCMWB-!6uM*+h2X;j@Q9eUeL+OP-NiVb#&) zFuQ(?QIC@qbbg)*`C4Vst3>4h)u~ZA7}g!iMgMg!PD5&>NGqO0XIMf~VI@U8*;Iz9lH|fBR zY@fyBmzh~=ezR34?z>&sq7i8J{J2?2;GoRDcDg#;!YIAyxn`bf7+Z<@_;(XXLP71!4{?LrY*2uDa)$r`KN{-)aY`%9lYGWy9~h{M_B!;vcER~}>? zbBAG{f-I+Yoq%jSnozY!->oQbkyk0C3$T^CC+nO}au^gQ5k@` zy2Nu3?USg5H{r3|aMWc`p*dtp@j6M1(HOI3d8IN5uA5wKXnZ3tRTa=-gmxJczXyP% zoy~E`7TE=Xc(+si>KZ8tHT@Ad&`{(V)|^i+%%0pbm$g`!)EJKOAx%cP&7a(!VXJqz zT?-qdSC9&G$N*vMn5Cgz_MXeH&VdUfWw!3-bN=gM41hT9U|JH z+(3?(vEq^vXh4KoQR5@6S~9V@ho#MgOr1ij5KaSSN(CLNe`)RD(LltmjOfx2_=C;0 zhqqz&Tf%QaRb>r5M472oM$WboXg4hyrU{g(w3>`TZmy}%20XIg!W)^~6kc!k zj*({>el~pH^9d+r<1h7SnK94oY$B%R+dLGdXg^&w1F`Gje|f!Y`vJ_Wu!za3SSg-i zYhrKU2^-3V#4*Sb5@gm;JlyVDSHF3K!*uy~%uA^$Hw^R6Zgl=Qmwl)6nEPMztw^q1 zX$J7BTlW`DINiI=kN6vQ^OoP_+kLBVc_;qtig$_Rh%q{%2zy84we-Qo^ z;=?fEzrX5Oxaj-eZr$+PPx0pPOMV?b@m>6S*vsKbeE#`wnoIeXpMU=OXMO$b*?T{J z_ubE*{qQG0{>x{7_1=5$%H5Se^bvg%`7?j)3 zKO)oAO!OX=iBM2Yj$1-B+M}yKsR4?JC9h{n^tyfUOkNplKLEvLped@E2ZuLUX9q@|__WBocH)azy<+Zfihw zCwJVAJZDydibu65Ly^4BIu1F+t!@B1R`f$Sy9`HP$V~jx>UsDWy3J`|7WNG;tu5SO zOPLXzq`4&xab{xt5C4LOiCmZjQ>bC|-IKaM{GqEs)2MmcutndIy+p$wc+qzvq>)d} z>8F}BtMzp$kU+F^x;tW-oirf&VdFYAM_bR*)I7f&j0H887#Aw#v7C2gA3sr{B813H zJts*<(4t7{0F+G&f6}gTCvi2(zSv|MN@zB_&UDmQvI@8L*m`Jgivm3=kgc7gCgjaQatnb#C=a-qdgq=?<-JBvzS{w42jl1HZ zGz$OR`mo(l4q!p(UaG|g-7o?CrK>3y{SCM#V6wkqt)>sI9FBtOSN(i>X@jI~3|2&|-4g>4PQ84FMj%{r7ijiHXmWsg)a zK^Kjn)P-qhp0SL6!=7_BEAKzXaFAsZ@bn%O=y*n$>gNuK(3fLVZK!e|90_DiGGW|P zDrM_LktR6!9;KY1Ej0E2J7quQwaIM0^>-XTGS$e7ljBKWgTU2#mYzZ{Q!(c2=00^J z)+|;$fRQZYM;+SD*oUifTJY7Tb1vVaB*O7%u5;Udt&^D85*T-Y^IqD?XoCpS%+nJ- zHn=Zix6EV!u@>>xBz*WFAZ=zCWbz(`CCB-M#J@v(fD#kPv{D*HoXd zy&Z~woVu@Jyg$iP{000JBvfSPXBL;8`@KDS84_C$n4~eCBDdj4Y{6 z%BH0$5fqOg!p+QUyQQMv)--~};qnrK=sT4Co9^_EkoTmBp@t6+ZtxcZI~&{%o`R!{ zeCj3~is*Qv@+U@=o6#QFc|r(I=?$GcyS?)=89ATm7{ia60YX-}fw@AbOny=_fHL~l zy+En`zVyuzULI-JH8G%5-s<*EjT2}iLwswk<<7^i08wavL2U^|9Ee|Gh) z3^mad&W!MXfBK`%b>AV^8ecP(!KTTGyu;z;rsaL8Qz?FlX1gzdR02XWT!_sLiY#Hf zt`2z?Y@29Ynt2|uK;pxug6GtqY>wRywB4J3PNmR_Pyy6nHa+`FP#4Yc823fCPL!oV z5wG@UZ7i+ARVb&gJ?hlHgR#o{%wzy|QKd%og|H&~nH1HSFFzB~s|8p-z91Z}fe{8| zirdf#Q=gEwhF&<@QzQ)=rC7;7M@cbePbsP6q{BwjHUKqxMP3`V)h0cU7Y22T?KE7# z8B>DN(2IU<8z4PTPJTR}6>Lp;;g?2%lf#_EbB2?J&>3nKSa3IO zxO=E<>MO`N5^W$8)fehrd=#QZfHwOIz=)si*TB}81a;GbT~NZI;Nc?yB}_Q0Lg}D# zW%X4*T1G0nDuJkJ8Wxk?T0)V(ffr4zI_C6?XnB-9C?+ygJwitnf)0CaYjQ39J+7iY zZmXNhQ4UJ%Q=XPnt`u(|(f9^(o~;L%76Y&kOfXd@pdFHVQ5G&%OllCuBAkUO<0VXA zI1GshAao;iq{9gg`ta&%~?*47eyY?WL?r+{PGezyj!2o0eG(hR?bE& z>h-YnF6PO)EGIJcIAJRr^*`IT>{D=O+PojZK#(_2Q>74{c*CxZsP_wX_)=~=N~IVr zW?*DncdxJ=v^c$P@1`PyZXEDo!EZ2^;iTrm)3|e<4qr~DY*k6*F`DP1ayR%bXS?Z) zYPz}~Soca5rfil~`85!RrIS|9P3$r>K`~JJDHsN*v3{RhK!mXwdC5dUj0|M_wT9vk zDgbl*TeGUlJs{;%eAlo229K%)Byr2cMU0{Yi+=UkivChvg_wCA){`EYZ2zGb> z*ZuPsfA|}dB=dQp8Z$L5)sksU)=D$e(o{*|41}i&=bl&v*`2+Xm%0s`kk{44FoU~p zb(xm-fiUCA0Q9X*j`EN@^!R7~O5_Xkq0TOt7*L_DD;K#Mg$&*K^C_qpY6RW8TEZme zo|22@tcB-F1!rNW_V0kaSJu4${1D?TZCouGwW~tv#As}lNeR}*6r4v8!stlZz!J|# z;BsxmyAAZTXfZzk*8JhC)W;GH{nS@?h?a4HH6FKs4<`hj3s5!km)^cc$SE-& zQV?5GyjE4YW+f~_Hr@^Cn862)lfywojzvxmqOi54bF$>tXNgS5iaP{!3BTw%xbG)Thxqlh`ZS%RBWFVp-%4arz!x1ULGpA6h>-A|_$vVu;<`puRu_jbTjPk8-(s}1 zuveq6MYqAtbk2|c_F~9W0l&uhsq$^eD*HIt5plGN5%%G#&!@*ig9Iq9MhY%-s@N3! zK~sh2(k1Dy7p6q7SzGzLgK&SI&dS%#wf?(b+^@T83g^TpbXwImWhX68KDV%R_D$RG zcHBgYntdu$7w4=hM%)=Y_%_j&GN!_%|2u>bRQXqp@D6Sr8JWhNgAzsIHfrfU!}cF-Q{&!u?=zsj{*RR#^Lt#8YD=o zgb}V_&X8`@08XNBL!EBd_M4gAsD@Awu_AuB+ab3(pS4WpiaW41Z^G~%y-pFP3IW;GGtZ_8eNT@^7#ALb zg~Q?Z6RG;gL|(cEq|@2@J!PUOpq*ckgLzzNXG}g|Wl1@l9&F;KFP+)}!4500y6!#_DJz!BWwdwc%K82G^~L z-{G(Mxkp+c&TbOuMA(GlZOCPa&n6nUrLv1!>YQ6A_H^T%USyI0nUn4Sk6)U^7bCDm z%n}H`zkD8+Phb&eyse zi;m^E%jiDXh5@J=_-+=M%E%QAIYkb!Ys*wU+?rggA)GyAmT1(Z!zPQXc*&T8`N!7d z3Xp1VeFwb(x{=|BJ@AGyiw_rY;ihSb{1MJ1JQ+bq8=F>ywt_ja5)VzV4%U5FNA_bA zU8OVgvgrNYR2v6ejkhG{ms9rGnP-2)4i^V)uLv&K_5>Mlr>EU=OK6`_Q-qTZ zbtBDF=a4Cd$~G({o>jB5g?Ov2K!vi6qh{WV`5k zUdX>J?J;PYKBx@cx;gxZOf|E!K+f%NW|4N%dw9>4?J0XkfMY9Kv7g5$VKq)+WBAU>MqG{s;SDNI zJba(5!d1$HWZc;pR+!CS+1M#EhmpFOG-YNF?Wk08?a*1!;$PFD%I$VTkH26!e1$rp zet|V}qq5qNBM%*-D;2H`2@+=MsqJs`^iJ?8_e0bF9<(ZM`Ak%`^9uf(>I1UDfSUQf zZ)cEA!@2o4)!)x#JV3&a{94-&BV{fg&2`qlZfF05&tD>BT!5*Om|b>k^zh*idiPQe zU}b`r+0jSgg%!sxV=E?ID!`tsh@MA%mX#25sFTRbGA7SDd?agag-lU;7_My{wQ=wr z&nJ9+*v!`+@G1^pI^M@je<3gt(d)MQEgAce;9!yTNdVyiqS!W5@%%*x48Uz}U-lf^+&n&;wvVg| z8DeBuV1@vBX4tLB{F;{6CD0gDUx0#pGhNY-quEVUW?QRFc=!lU4`!nEQ zvZC-P)7htm1`TN)s3DnQB}`fh^+4GC5#>6*=0N`~Th2)J5lJ`_v))oTzopqYH)6x( zQca!Mxw+4eiiMuIkUgJZ{~1c`EZX1G+Zh_F+z^;-TRK9B=EoI^H@~IUaLnaxj)Xc2 z3#UPqI3$vG`c*WuqJmSA(jC2H$hbwwya?!e z1m@9H7d>#f)uq2~#st=|yUDC3kH8||gz~y4a#y8a<4$iChZ3BZu3*z~KY+X*SO`$E zxaK-Ue|8FLrUgRrd}7llNgrY*ejQrtWy1z;Z1R+bc(m+Ld#^C0C>O&zj><2Z`h~k= zEo5_K{8?h6LL_cFrrFKIBbaQGJYcm!p|HKIZ znMq*Uf4IGH#Dom1?g|v{P^6&59|6s3g!CVmnE2)79G?!pQ}F;~a&z*s1>iGL6tWYJ z_Pg2RAerW-6BgJ55rxhuS^glohGd=B>PoR?!f2sWVJwB_8-)D46)1b%(6$S#l#AD?B%-ZVMmp8ke zoscBSMr{_8s${%FO$V|P9te_Sc)l-KoMv~#q1SlZBvmVJLax{k-II_;61(F6-uAd} zhTcrWLLx-yu&X4$f*fdQS{HlX1bZQ|PsVAJ6&YJg z3E5%2;E=>U0SvNgYyCf53tM6>4 zw5f5J(%Cc0Kfz4nWyl3_Zc#!R5pu}RCpkuL1(m{;tWWtCXHcb0+S{x2+pa2`uj&h# zQK!|RzMx>`f0#@3wC2ypwO$imJD-JX?Zy5N>e+aQ}EpiT~Ww+r_ zNKCaG;J7ywa{O?t4uMz zQo#AnZEFT1rfyEyL8FX>Nh+Xq>N>o``BPDK%kLuDp$dP1Avxz0)C-)8wmT!a8jiu? z*&hC5mR=oMF9Xh_R=pu8NV6`3so%lV$ablXMS@(`M3mI+&tLo-$&EZgAo=qb|2xO1 z8->xZlhm7Im!a1eibxZAQOa}N>h3p_~rA2a^yIs_i+=>GgNi9 zca3fgiI0;Xs9N!elrn`b-yv(=`u0SofMqrO!qElG(58tm)a~KR3E%3B;vXwyCUAEl zd~6-CL}pxL6(?CuComc#3Iwr03dVWZqgP4}jY$wm-BUWiIT7XJ*%=d--%dCMV%L<1 z;q`zq73O6^lZ^O#>)k{db%djgy^lGrba@`4rF7qsJ@xa8o&@L7?`2i)_!^ywlv+Qn zNV^gLxs{YVcK>+f1r?`GwaYTsn>qYB*wutPAAU*ou_)r|q$IO#Ui1btENQHZg;8P( zFL^?)+SDeMHf7B6E(f>qt*+E%o?!717tnEnh^WrsT4|FB1veKxF4|PSHC+821+yYk zPFk8)BWzNH(vOeAKb->j?QTcb(Ji~Qv897t%Iv0CZmZP4rgkd(_1QVm8J{3j{Dj2G z@gb6_MW0jZlHp?14J=$(IN%#hEbjBvrV5|rF#M(9=2)kI#2#=?Enq{k9ay$ZRIM_H z#mZ_wp zTbL54rfpuN+cg>;Q}aVc;5i=%d448^fxuNXe2mI4J0i9XON~(UZUzMn8l^8sqQS33 z{t7?MEI_k<4QOIWfEaxjFnjy!r zNja9bSD)Sw`}tZRhLCcadfU zr<#>WA%|@egu@C1kckk~nnuv7JCmnXQsUE1(fPo;2I&A$6M@-?n~O z4F8RS0|V0s;t1NEZmtp<9a|Avx$W4+LA0|6RRCFwMoHKm)WK;*eIXoq;~c(Pw*(?S z)SB0-4M#7JYte#4%NoUE1v<2FZr&P|`qD z>d1sV3`;Y*l`KM3;+Hur8rEfvE<9ltEm#*SCq820$a3rC1b8-S8v)qm@azY|QAwMb z`+%7~Tt$7-B{?sT0~y-g>IU$?%XcEgJ|d|iBt6GodocRNtAF18ox2=ov+&d+HyWAfMwwU@ ztMywdUS=N3xgFOtEz8?N@S;iLd-)KfQ0EJ0ArkH? zL9-hf_JP$71QhSShvv9`tLO2v@IfaEz@19wc$EVHdv9)P&S&NPtXMKcD=bC*C6ZK7~s-p_<$) zKEJB$m%YxF+NZwE5VaM-U0|IhhXqO4uAINf?0<(A;fixwR+CCIuSgPThG`xy!jNxR0PAwg6My2g=5+awODHD(j5v{0H&hcBn-1rpwd z5w7PFK_L4H6^4A?Z5TXecJss=fsUZqUNL1XL1cO)*ylxS>nWzv2+~(1-iUPRzL{Ob z3E`gewFsU)t^OffLgDbPxs9PfdP7i})Hq8kH61lr0q9fWzDoYfhFe5PM=C@o7*(#% zai+Gd-*9Q==CzhqnQR?Rz8a`9oVdSqJ{`qO>25;AF-Rja|69U zEP)Fbo9MZ67~?X0M=2N4;h+FD^{ggL?fT4x*6^r_Epwj!)kf1OPN?MmF@nx9gK{Y>Z%u%pFB8LCv!p+iTJt9#R4~*;2P0VxAquH%hdhcrYJRl( z)7VM9`WHW0$U=0=&gV>?n?19VnOI?rbUx8{;i0vx7&Vtky`4DcFr+|4h^@_$@j(M( zilER)B+KnxxL#MQMM1$x8Y?&6Y=On~intkgI!YD8y5IUv^nw|t6Y2-Q*D$0RKMN1O_#x`?TR?YVaRt98N_{) z!8Xh~M`TfOc`3V0g_HKZzpg}EWbj+|=nkQvxR2-EKy+x@MPQTkO6rVW1l?1{&8pTXRb}1Yw z3O0zC0>9O7lUfANQ(rW4zi>ZP>8WIG}!fRL)C<970%6!hy!s-2a|v?r6CzsAOhKJdk4E7!w7>Ts@LQ8mrPBA}8VM^KwWze1TvamK_o& zO0k&BYrA`Y>1twzL?MYctabRol_T6RYhIXaiN?}S)n4FQx#j>_ke*qiQgEaN$h(z! z=6fQ3GcYxGThr=wnvP>no~Gp}Dl$xEh^_8S19mnX{D;f7T0x8U3!i@Mj_f;~`)SXX zK@uX1*%s{|&LN_W`yD+~z+)!&81(@Ki!K7u)^`$TX*pS0=2CKtUb?VQ3%seVqSSn~v8c+^tJ zZGAKPrd!f$baG85q3G|b9xYqr)p$WGQ z7KrYV9{FrIxMNLKYqvpJy7&%^+oJI^Xg$;ma097i)-F_p6Qxb-)al|~E^QS{$Bw7f zM`G8oBD+mhV;IHLTGraqQMXhq#iVI^1cg#YM;c`!rlW~$=wC=+y@8iXpsza zbT;epypEwSQU&V-WIMs*d5tuXXduL?Ni=xL@JU?n_)635Pm zgKrVej(8c85^P2>LkTdOGf%=ocoHDnpI>bl2=j$%8WZR`Hhv} z7Z^-38uoE7hUPNFh4=;YAr4^zPrZa*!>r(5tUK8zuvg&7q5uqizd*ZCG?8aNWikOF ztDe^+0nJ4IXg5cq0Ms2sK;*l-7XYT@PaR8+NCOOnJ4cTy1n@R% zUl~RPYCco5Suot-NthgNl|b6?7^bDC>M-D1l-yA=dZaaz-t9Zo|*{|0Mm>>0PT?bnd)ArvUWqH$~A zZGOamy_>iECg1K`eak!XXCJTiwP*6V=@&Zu47|qh*Z%qkKm0-XR|wa`g#Z4kBjlp* zf4gpMTcZ&z`;a<9FZt{MiqG^5egJ z_E+z{_paO-`9mMkH<3T{7Z3V)kFV1oJ^jhkA5%s2o3NWaHK{Vt7`be=Gn60;9v63L z9=d&X|IsMq`ndg%omAgFhP=`@J@(pzk*rRr>+$a>}AIhGjSYy7xNI}35BvoJlxyJnlR2O0hm#2S%>6$320wcHG-3TzPY8FM83*Ai z1zt@dnye>?alLMm5TZ`$W4F0<$H?gbQ80ORhnSW5Uqng%*yu{!j+MCoj7hJJ1zI2a zV0iVLi&+;6|4`RgA^G(K-43MfqNGE@$}9uOEHeg16NsJ8yVq=4ypKL3lz<+(SN!d6 z_npR7%6^tzme(=gzpn>X7M?f^?=J`G2J8r_!Cl1Yb;hj^{{5nYGt2f8?pS16n5>~X zEo)%GE?7f~$(Mq4ntbhd#fw8DP70G*sX`%w5N+W^)c#!Fu#E@gxYC~qYJ6z;M+`u| zbLu6Nn)r+PY<0XtXGiZO94j5S51&>)9|;LSe?C-4{S8p7A%*s&kBH&QNDg%u^Lhg_ z@$8nO?fhaMZm?5!A+=#=;qaKSyjXZ6{Xy1f499Nkx4;eLtCApbPXwD9uB+{92W&#P z1@m^Su5K;{PhyTU%B9<`-wbYd<>iJ%UYnLyZ7ZC<_d&*T%z!dmsAX@K3lpP8PsfWy z$58`_!Nfw|l0+;iU~c<5E;=Uw14=c3H>KZ43WJy(19IlEVt5}xzsLDIs?g36--Poy zh>2-kFNZd45#+nB-!sg$M|SeW!{s4_`KcP57<@4YVNBX$YAvf}#o&ogt{9zS=1}L( zWMfmSDL4RAX3x`wD(nWW5IB8TZkqUzpaglY{hBg0RaiFZA3dxc%JC1Sl&$wwolf|o zf@PLT+NTL1iiN?O^^uC$HIZR2LSb}uk^}7(@7x3TsK5HUv7fdm%)W0Iu4{CAG29S! z;WTFSud2k^KQNo*{+mGg4(+=~xNMb@knV=t)9ed$hHzFsG;rkpdy==Zifa8q=L>Iy z57a%vJgh7r=esI~Y{f=|hXtxy6{(kx76@<{J}I92qnwI&?9;LgvFIB44)?O9L|n!z zXgZDbDmHEe$gV- zz&s;Xnd|Tt+PP6rS4n;SuyI{1Xe@-S?;e^DJXtt-IrXzo&^U<7HVhb{j{is-R7idx zFdS~zj1CdQIZtMZ=-Zu9p-4y<#*Nf`HK@l!jnMYo`LaZGb!)CZr>nzl&kg7%(}y#O z#%o51rdHXaUZURGwnwjjWaazEV(j-K6qbvzD{Zz3AG~XmUwW3jsyqBb-D)`#IPHBnBZ&5g0(u%TTv~IgAPI%G zD|->~vFnqHny5$<+E{C9l)XCymAb`|L>oaa+}dxpi!r@~gFS%i-53x5XnsQqBqU1) zoE`zlVq=Bn%1pJImdaA1am0bZ=2Wo0-sFEAFLznQkU?CdT5o2DqxGH89yZpzN^>nC zBNi7gduHrs0>#kA>H5j>)}eEIIDDyUG9i2sYK&?du^hAuDbW%|LTFL}c+(OGo+w`q zE;CZ+dGxVqv)LxGyZ*Q-q@;%Q&jK}Y;(TFsgeDmdg%AM6ljn|=nFgh#5fbO3r8=E< zVBm2XS?1@HpL`UqrPB^aPfO1{A7K~sF>ZO+8Q~c;C&`f_@AJ86w;K+(p-f#9HA>($ zdKPkB-LtOHrSo>=bOmsUM*A4Q*;PoX7$!sP8F$gNBWeBG-ZYO2ez{q38%MyKye-3&jc>DT@??BBn~qi-B?WtE#D`d9v(6aH z%tF`QF7;b|00o^#viZ_TI*n<#iJ4R+?hcR49%qzKE)1BHn(-M$r{{#Sf6>fI zG*YVOirv&_7#Kh~S!9z3x61Wor&VT&ariG9dNxrK;BF~OaB`BvH_V2{>S8#&1mtD4 zY zkkHmNJt{Fj@!8^JINmC?%+n$@TX10wMTB#RQsMJ$;vy7&?xtH|`F6e8wHI^uY4C1+ zDr~{mU;kIKgif?AoVYpA=FoqbZ<>O>uRGE(#Q7ja-&qS zma5e?{ckuyK}(=fFfRcbL;k$Kr4s%)C&i zyoS#=AqF1n`2lcsc*(bLr|y7UAU9n{44b+7$A5(OO-O>z%8u-nv@M)zvOhb;QTn;shUkd!9NZ2;lIOb6jYzcEh;7|21d}w%M zreaS6e~4dZLrzBLJBOIqR4vuZVq)olRaaL zZ6@C0%RP?!8IHxqm}9&slBC;Z(^z!7-FyScyMWp;gsNqsWn%(t#Ff0ECYOip%<0BT z0rbdF61g{9nJ~f3#izQ4htV%J&a3SXn~LzHfaI8?0o-=$6ueCF6g6t59BaCc?+i{* zIQ#D8>bfcAU~l1-9ITLsn^B6w;3APng``9I z5LJ`f`|`(I3V0lDJxRf2(2v~-38VREy^b;I9z`YzB$|_pF%}Ha=|M4e0y-GzbfPz> z$qskmI02d*1b#5H zQBm@n=5l7%8!FZMs-OBTGz)2(n}5$j^orSC#bx+#xK80nktc~C?whvX?Z`55+piBV zTU%4l51Vjf8@aEagahAq8=FpQKUaVH&p&_hhY`bwP5F#3!|Q+ggbOLs9uBWUif^}A39^j(xvI(aEVO`1OmI+{FACNNhQRG=)1b z%Oo-s%rHmxZA&1#Y~x-M(n@<_q|ug1v=J=sGUPw_JEZ%STBu`Y;yTiaskXJDYGhh^ z!@o2#bZHc)I$c$0tv3_UrkkOkcW7pJev8jXqYS@@Ljrq*N<|VEkak6L-?L02@k*2}~^xNSvgDv8`aK^2bvf8EG(Rq}=d~ z5GAK25m?zL{DQAW^DDX8&ocW-j!$|=cL7^F^<|w zVOOF^M+;PuhdBZ&6!%285n_4P8Xb8yMQ8#7ISSS7@E`CATFruX&Gks@MkwobMcoJGxt7n}^L20}TF?6;P z9EiDj&2vPC+OQ^nVc;<~(Y=E<56R?AG+)?;z@k>EmN^xQ@9+p&;3YPV8&cg?eN(xbZo^7)>a!LUl#ER$Hn;LjPEct^;MTJT<3FWi-0D9 z%*C!2NhZ0;4NXf~_%@R@=I%>)V@RS@yELvW3SMq|5zhE#9-AXDBEzNkSmGe0wDgUy z^1CBsK5S%L)S+y3qY>Qot#^L-?47q?i9-3^FZI{E2EZ=5-ue{au5Wam@BHv>l2{>g z09wv3T&s2nwob;ZG=r3!PNV&CjL}^U8aj0+qvpw{OpBjyM3GyuQPNLJh}kAJRaXqH zW#j?E+@|x4GZ2}NeCSXL=ulFPOcFe(jOgtEx)I6jq)oCA%tkE#+kq|GX39U3aCd~+ zq&pkl{qackPAF;Oxe@_1SPTrH3E^Tg_4QpmaB77z--7Hja4^GbBiz(&!|n!+4&Fna z2kzMIHrCIgXk(T7JsxR{w}mWHspO-x1&G1iI3Z_@#UkWacvK#R{Ld%u6CjO2K+=W0 zqmX>raJ%cR5J;PPLYCRAmL1O(Z^qGe*b)toXL}kLCoQVEEB~_f1E#q=X{As#A5uEM zHd@<2UX5}fdX_AF-&AdG@&lT!(#xuJe&KYt$&>OZsUu30#R;QR=L4MhEhzVRKyF?D~-7y%eS|+ZdyFYnn<> zvQVJ$VxilS0bJP26QAx0T84RRh@3;ep>7!vPiPtY7QYPF6pl5`FrYWRs?dn1hJL%m z(5ylVh5d2q`G>CCaFiOBGmD4Xu+Q0JE3779mK35C>bjcxnPW2x^*!7qzun2Hf^X{}#ys8yGg;gqY$IbEV)+`j;uTUhOwgJ{6PUu%6{ngE7ZeTF0R;;C zKelI=Rj6R~sNx!@8F``10w#j3CR?KHuZt4(7V1L;7^F%?(nonapYuBYvz;J`d=sCF z^e>#1d{zh+lwNr;ivt+VeEN(0pKk4TG<39MU{lR2r64=owQ7pPgg~0FfLcNSTKC*c zrhibWO(<5%A#b2EatF+QK8J+}2}cRxbZWd$L#nVsVBk%LXnG6imW2ee4@q2M1x3P^ z+MyuY?)4PCx`qv*qg{y55<@*U2p~3uxz(L?OSm+0_#5U^m7`F|ibo2E4UZA+5Mnue5Fi!Okp{V?rHu##@yIa-%9_THZs5!vTVH07tW7}@ji@beACp0y zfkBq$a)f6gP`SDdiA3gB??)~lu8DW1QB$3Qhy1EOSfBRs>t+D>@I0fM8lG*^P#Y^U z;vs=L{Y@Oj?Pj3K7_pEiZEj^asM0DZd4FZ5IF+fN${DNEJYR}QWlNDq?92{)B-ip5 z_u*;vJY-Hs%9$lgWR!+vs6b`LiY}L#0-un?5#b12Z8Ts{ks@(9XQ7^X%ofWIe9G8dWQnMw9TJ)K4Aa#uSo582L?Qes|qe@$*){{x9R$jT-EYG^Qdmvs8$QG3p$LdBq{ydp2#3}HC9%R`|yJo;x;KZ#hBH*I^ z3q>L-ECzil4ch=LNnMz-0#SqpAc;e-=uAStHARkcXj?opG}h*(Z&WddkdCZJZH$XxTy@Mm>YrN2EY!xA``S)fEXJi;dxXX=;A z=%^fUT5*Wc{3s>9tRf*^$?C>#>)uorYHu1hH7%C89g}q}5kn$tD~YS$F^YF8g+7Z+ z{O&tzrdg4koMbz%p{5t9i8@Eaida(+yc+5_VMk0~FscaCYuc*;_RIa5Q51~ISMjq) z0o1B^U+TTkLP&iuwd;g{Kp0gmSDFn+F%>O|n?Soqh^vu?bBJ(p8ivmEwh zq92&M{-AfKCiO=<}4nFC%geqYEdbzub?F-Z3-QINqUQ@0ja7=7Z5Gc6c*A@vbicD zbvsXGI6(ARLV7uN)w(L$lZ+QVhB&hj;R&JsS9oNRK*!5m3~e2M!9u@zJSgRj20z19 z>Ad6wh7FRbUu$?-_X;9y880K1w|vuXHM=`#+X%cSjmh!0WQY&H1#VH)yV!8occ-qE z-!#Tys&Y3UVOOcB<*X>Y6r_}kfZUyy>Tpl3kEbr4WhD3evoiwn5y}X54jR7rw?paKBd{#k7 ztbtIgYR*6?pQ8dB`dL_?1{T-sh7un4@nR;#derkAon!OmA|8w{of6%BSy|<`+e!)& zw59T7@!M{x@XlQ3InjI1s^h|Er?Wx{4&{mEB|8O}#3i*Qs0RFf5@Hy+n~G-~SefId zm3EB=WV+v|t}&^$Jqnrd{oibiY8dEUelut@`ttQEIN25nnmwQFMEKR}kjq}b1&1&O zArLz+6%&e)mBuZ!Lx@ZvDu&yLfUIA4Z^ei!Zi^+L{UKFM_Oqu(K-~`vNMoJTIW_^+1rYzSk7~dXX<{X$vg=&&--K=z zo$ccDp(;1Ek3&k0S*^sKYLnoNZ~FT)fBi}|P)VhN0a~X!_vJVHJaDSW$fFmbfh}Hq z4PFHwFGUMuYV#yzOmzzx*X&A))U7-zY_9sU5*VyjtHw2A&>5I~5f)+9x7`X;DFKtV zxO5HhuCrN0LjV96G(oM1+LZDZwj2k#rTt*^BnPiXi~lRm8Z#=)LI_5+k?~22sEVQT zd9@z3D%Q8#ttvM52EGgs80;0B))R^r(>yC*Z?)(T{ir0LB)q#1$7mbgT4jo&s|+`} zC1>VfRVT`o)#kd)zB+5mIjz7 zh+zo3s@hcFb#VwEyNgZDx3Rfm379iB3LbO`VtqCgZOEwXu>AH3y2j~7HCi?gzn6VH zS^U-?8b{_Uc^CVb}rQzMD@El1&CRO?-P94ZM}Mk6mj-QsL4%~LjiVf z3a!2#Wimr!MmnS8@{jR`Ijgd5yF!>W_QHindB^B<2nxTdl^-?fsiN>GffMCn1ugB= zao^XuhGr0C!0BuZBm56Dph9T8ZL1%)gfT)#&&M(RD>VnOEsRJD%+A0?%AL& z2V?~vLj0$3MxM9Tt7)PP72!(ti|~!gF&E!}blhNmS)cyM)D8KL`Am3ZP(3_}m&6+G z)mF%b-03uubKML|siL2yNjBU4r}lu)`TSghqdF|FFLg|aCp)fnsWTOOMTkV@nAjPz zG?IM?9hZIGw3{xFvp;8ileeQj*H$3GO8p!A$cJ^9a!R9AFKNKp(XPOS={!^`oJT3E zocM#{cBZb*I+4}qh>e_H#V1#})d3udya;8_6AV2cJ$AnZQUz}26Y!fNE$PCh%BRd{ zlXY?DFxBv1s3npi&bi*xDsi|9R4HL-$tR!{Xl6Sx&CSbtbk0-z@R+M*%!6g722I}? z6vMgH@#&a8;s-_?{Ku&1bT~AnCnFpvp2h!9V)bSw-#E-!I@AUbZZRABL_v4r`BW~YZbFJ`)2(g9-@OwsXG2+hVjQ9I#X&5RosM_#L7);| zP89Ms$S~J>QR|uiG9`eXe)8bigFv+NkQ}hzEjfl1DGD!Ai%hpNeJiShX(T`dCEF*u zD)FnxAPdj6QRT_=D(&U@G@8awlk=R@kv^P!i$vV1K2Xl9POKzId^NlMrSQWh{yo>} zTe>CXbl)Fha7ncQN=C|FHlC<6R6_1Rm7v0QT!xOD;)mxY^>KE}4D|me z09z-8$C&OTUIRm3nb?fAF(V!f)9KMM%XkxGHGPv~&!|9kiafQ#?l$N|pc7C;l;1qN zMZ@Jc8x?3sB#X1zs6v207?FwrcBgaT^`Sze{Bj@H&;zWj2=P+Ws_= zN`ctWAEHs=)b_NFulPQ5eED^XX2=xW&0iIPotSKWO z{RO7uAgSIwq~iKNKCS^*QTRn^soFFYtHZLp$s2S)Jh8Z&dK2&Vh zWgdlM$}k=}Vnw{P-aT&`KE5r;yKnTBYmv}s3&-Jg*L&__P@_TvxcxM!IF)f9;Z1J> zbXzLzluSyLqP-W_A-brI+i*CQUI_LbVla>zTgqW(iiQ#xCC(z#ZmPDsdYYSvr<5qZ zdohg33;*dOvo#4fl_r(!OJ4+53*tWtt( z$%5r%fgH2I(;7ai%3U_h(Ro~n7|J`P(wv@p6T-g(hcaykXDYxo1hy`RUs!xHrr+`! zIW1+{NwoX22h}l5XerSNXvw=PRR}OV?1l*s=DMI00dpP_KBxi%QrX0JoU;lgW>>@~ z(t3EZ_;e4hIY7I?th!&?hAEeo2*xsJHf35LYvp>coevc%o!wt(xTg=3f0szFiW$ErX@Agti_qm z`;7lG6h*o7}(DpRgpxP&WMURFLLdm zq0cV9%F67yJeq*W<1$XGsouj0U*R?+o}%aT-GQ=-KZ>+u%}NPhm>w}1WtD{e0TtYG z;Wi%jCMKS_?!^6&#OGmQCf^%hJ!|`2Wi(7pj4FL@-?uG{k^b1nJz*DK0dP0AsQjj zp8}+%TXd3FwC7&XZ86}eLt%(0pUuFy)v=T$a>p!Y#FTh+!d*kTO`!k5^KhpKWkUEb zt%-63LC$3&6(Bx&1X}XpxN#sWfYPXpDWf<8RmLe*FCAUDN>Qr^o)qeR&ZFCHrb4~s zM;bsrvYX6+e`|yBpM-8Rrd05e-LNQotuJ4%E0Ed>YDNJikMC}YU+Svf2tMbs?TxUh zFu3s(TuOQBUIMUfWkj_LTZ5RD_Y!T-Fo=mTTe#8?1V0>?aU0d)e#xhw^Y@UnK!6Jk z=dR|X=B(DWUC(l*$fixTIzmfD!NpT)d7bAe0#tvDWjm>nDtys2+ZARu4b51#k~FT| z8X4Y;VRg(|m%T}_yKJ;7Zd1YB`5U_#)7^{$Gg`iQa;h~C&N#6ydqbH;4^4~lC1{ry zrx#~=t4$-j*0spv zdXG>SC{&cwWKNtclc;W8Pmkbr|JPqzG*Vv~U*L6w4CNJfJq;1wN_cqap@B+BpQ&%0 z$8WgQ0h~bl)JtIU#;yjhJai=1RZz7H%)$2MSk*Xf`ccvZbY)kc1$(+V=r=$`i2%mU zYch!1!2z6=ov$BF2+6CAfQiof!S?@>{8Br1UyW_9B76fzaH)bWakq!=G{pS@`cc#C z^KJJ{24LuTQ8`uEWGlS1K2$14UOcp~Q~O@@NlZkmgUbwCY|&tiDqcRQYURhNac z@yoNwpY%vwH}3puHlBB%zzSFSbx|%3Rb5|;uYEXH>P1^k6L;sLh}DG4e>=};aSfsb zT;i3qei35YuytSzoIRI04caxVzZNCD48qpZQh3Z~hw>X^Sn{$(v>Eqnys(PMH#k^7 z6TX+F#~ob6ZF=yGoaUL>k3O3b>}MU77;Jqeah7bL%7B0g1=E+RRhCKX7!HEtF#2!a z%=bHAFAICU;4{fiUA$SlW&Zz7ndJWY1SEe`0Yj>P!hi}HJ{rB&0oZfz) zd_OaGK$5~2VUZ!7*R~;h9mFR$Hu;1$UT+SXT977329Z zrZnp1D5c6UzFMqU{LVu@kUnP7;9eoLY%Cprvbg*ss95lcm#>Gg10;pld5%!|d=zvM zVtBx7Dj|qHyV$kE+2uDqZV|xJx;%Ef?z=HBirFr^E7@HFJ_(OtvI#Z$md`=*+>zzA1L zGn-99Fk!0j@^znxh4FVn=*WHtDG22fFto@Z*FjFXE zLeFRaX!ywhgZc?~4Li7^b2ihyNwWnAuVnIuJ#64F!isu&}V##S>I<9IMp z@NZg9^>4Q}1#FcEw_q)E93^@RppSQH7sx^BWj=WeSyj#Iwp<94Hv9z2xo)fR>+ovv zPvy!_5*c@WhBFbDpS_alFm@%mLLt0+MYLkZ0g{C6vNS|_?PRXraXZOGGKzYaufcEX zG#>YHTpzT<3e6VV)k|iH!XIY-oImv798tJ*4{wOsEt#%k%F-0F$~sIJI5yWWrwKgC zxaIe8eP5OX+b8ktTz*4sn`R+lSwq#Ix>}clvxf1F&*=Q}bq)Fjx;(VQx}l85bx3WQ zg~n4#F{5f2@gCP1WuDkg)bopRe=u;?h>PzM(c)|tP!Zq+{=Z7H#b$f+By!!g_;-q3+A{0%OZ zuF53W@)H2GAjZ#-wI+Pt!<Vl?|;OU zvJlT~8d0N#FFwWeflr&P#cDDksO7c-&+9P8@2 zqV<6~+sV*!QjL}NCyQSdl~6QK<%D_)Gv^A4R&&zMh)f<9p+gyspUR5oR1;W>j3mY2 z-IhI#p4CdW8C}ng?bga~pfqVs<`}g#`R2_uN^(rzz~V|7htu`Qb&3pUBGI^=su|Ou zqlV}|HVoB>#pbj*^Rt{vOn%ITGN~V@OQMy?u<8#_?e)w=T(vN~0DXP5dT}pCCmOB5 z+NjSo!NQ~-oy5=ao|u20#xN>gSCuH)O2c>eeB(RgD{hWKsDhixExNehtQUv4rk94C zG8l5d?8YuBrYFuH33c}P@|XE^?NqZ)EsYnGYuSr*&)Tl~I^`DbIQ;3TYvAsKamjec zW1J~AC!R4-19XgfV9JecNX4q~GQ45dt}NteV&| ztCj$MN7su7u?jt+$OX)VXbGxc_Hzy}N;Vyl60-vvAss@_@h#-W-PNPkuvmHu^I^1n zb^$rVwiU?f!-uo|X7X#&HQKf)e8wm5I+R`Yw%?$b`LYyxt?{6poi_*#NDEFGO6pTEa^$5m)5TOAwbASCctL$U^+N)^p@K^w~w)3wVROYPO4wt4TZlC1)E>L zj}C{$PM>Wu@6uacf#l()#nO-62EYOh`u$S7`2CxEVrBs)2&^l;hfwKOjnU`=1~h;s zuM4V;z@_1E7nM`TiF*6R-Vv&h2c>XA8J{HV_B~ft{qcrJs*)KZsZCsi$*y!Ii1)i{ zHCi;l(NnJCr>RFEmUVeo4gMgNcHhvpD~HOJKqMaW7(b%rlQjo92P@l{Bud4>F~iT6 z_Ej`2AQv<_VkmF`$SFqxfRHV)01W`ER^VLo?Y)ehZnxtD3Q&9<%JZ{84x?YUF@5(n zqrw#mab3pX6aIC-e!EwWptdLi^^YN!Ayi&|$Kf8kdYiVXdM_3qp)ShABBTk_R}JJ0 zJ1JDuNVCc&?<$d&J|-8#<-ZTY9G`QtTr^=T(rq!;4D^-z-Y?Z=&^&T1)KSt`+aL-3 zYeoo%M3-NMtz5XLpDaGFBxINX#!BHchZ0trbB8hJGgZTWxNjaCI>k5cV@vW98cmG0uc;v#V#3-XAa6$;Bjo@Xu229>!v(C6UjxN`mtzOz>P(2rS|>As9$F79 z=u)P_l9Y zOXhI@N+2CCGH)UX*;iH1L7%W#mHjkcg?7-oyqXM~+H@+F7ww56wTse5LiZ}?*I~); z#r=n(7%}%?3sVn7upr^FtbGCyC03imyR++uzo=izj4Nl=&v`zX{K_G6&3b*dtHFs} zqkL&W?}_*+c+!dy$53p@D)y2bG3pCzD)8lex|CU1JxqELt9>Vw0JR2F$CF5ZknDFG z0+?Wr!s%(n3HyW!u+rlVRJa+#?LDB)CIzW=c^odvXV*}`$NSEttAKd0?isq?+98Ku z6YWwh-_I4E9?*VDBPfeg;F8m*$kf*eHuBaJX6*L(HJsd=Q1No^dqOUA;LIF<4X8VF zv!39Xu8cWAJTEWD?jng>#GkKKdRQWA9=FjIU937G{&8-Hv}aB9eE(ct_!LF_ZY*H; z{B6~reOWy=R>fapU;)nbML?alJ#?Z8)?w*dOWY7PWUFe?52J*#e*2-j2M>vZZrS(QHkxMd$%>yI8-{T@`MT2px!5FFW)>x#K zFPO8c0p2Il&!@?2kT~=^&#JoZ+xWj(0HV#lz7>uenU$7`LstS3Bg_rXN-U|Up>eA5 zwaQTJ+Ip5g<^@lUwcu{7diRA;hgXZEd*sy1_T-ginqB6~O|8iJM)P7b3gx2J;&;2y z&4z*K875(u_pa)gD6yQ(>1Cbjw$xtkzoI;NpX#>rYM{I!S{r@#OhOT~DfkDAa51QG1=uB?35UvTtLt78Lm-e4rr#{`)tE{q76THM%DAJbNig4S9 z%zl}Z38~eoPoUnjp0x=ZorbKWDu6-i5yA$p@VVwMe;U`(jqO-m!z7T;BCvyWBVEDA z$KK6{UBurR12RN=v0=|?43;TzkjdqYS@-7&tmj%M z!O;7wWd?Ox8k3xbNiGL5Q^Xv|1R$jwGOy7l0g@6f|L*`EA5(86-jY|$KB`L@{jg8q zQzJ^awlJATW&#nNg1212cMm zKz!|Q^)ikN1#cboycO-qdF9!0AQTWJ2J1UA%!3btWi#VhbKB>^vQ-eqzOVf6JMl9m zl77)&@|$ze*b)Kd#-dAbD%C@^tE)upC2^f71x&;V{B_KKW_C+BF%-)S`UD6Qb=t;? zKbK8R7}xmQgpUv=<_XKdWRk%Efn^V?Ev_}g~D{uj09$W#X6bWnvwWKDt9~!#^U9l8rV0x-FnQ@ zhqh>)Q2ov_v!UL!(ej;bALrd=z7T!knk0+BpSjph4yV8+%g`Z#3DCNkMe{jddHm5z zkPpY*zL+ovLXTwrk_?!BRz1{(6Y;#G-9;i5orF&c=XhUWhkp&FtVecV#GZIX6t~Y+ zyWKO%Bp~zj$e!hCJ-&Kmw^W23e4)?&e4b70!XL!M>$+jtX=Zm8=_Wa}PI@wq@WO;P{d;^BqBq|sGcd-bX^p}Urw%=9=!$-ry z|He$<15hFnADJ3!@x;`%C^g^nW|#|N%>nc*g`7s8XZjB0?%JU%lrf7D^>UDN{QY*$ zyPQ2_qy0+M&8^WkLp#k~q9(V_)yl%SfOlR_n&04L4H)^=WPO=~Tx1-wXuA%TC_Wz{ zkTSl(x~BfYq#-HezhK3IW)fO4%`j2KgeKG%y(9E(=5w|oX0=Uw!s!yXK`>Q~;Cfwf zNm|eDYye$ZZ{$OS>^K!H6k8x2rRnEPuGsh~eI@0wp)*9n;%wZK=)o|X*T6MR_+Szy z*MA=;QUVI|nK7$8I@}f@(Om$&?s;`SMVVn7T9P9qxdmbbJR9KAv`zyw z0jTw0a^=!-Ac(bw)Fe$_GyqaSB*ryo5L7|sy>ahl4%fJb^5$48{#>A!Wv4M@JZXit z!ZV7gq6UqZxwoxK^2E3}{u$5iWNWse5h=`eOs|nM$}x4sccx%SxR%R_cKMzS$1lsU zuA0q{H2v;Z>)C5R%>SUl@6JNAiJ$h1AAInG_)|ZGZot29GfJzr z{c;<+FF(hd;~!P)U;N-lAK}lNu#LOpi!Xj(p6XS8@x>Q^Xp5iz%+zn#|K7ofXy+D&sTLHQse3em zpn>&Xr&0?v=$<1AmiNM*(jNLbXL6cr*8&S}F8b{oXieK~{Fwj&3a z;xlW`|`^}0V9S>(>Gu>){qAjBST2ZV#@vyh$ZPreU9hi8gnQ{ zm_ael%L$8tUV1-I>xfuqnsRiG(F2~^T3YQ`s-rX6-5jNUw`}v?4B$JNYTQJ(C1^;z z(!X8J^Sdo*zD!r1rcV+*XYMRbjuEkAyB6)<@)eDoni?t)Y+(GVP0U}=v)A}}5r`s{ zDv>kpN>jq*DN!3sUgkuZ)aB*t{uXA=zzPKu^Ol+#&UP30}#;y6{%Sl?&= zThxNe3PcDr+7R#yr(A=C9Af6In<;ESh%ie+eXPbYI}*t->zSa;iesJmzRS$YH#XA( z?GqSM@``?u+2Z%iYG8gN{%u{3U$-ZlF$^&kuSyd#w0BXAde2~GK+N~w1U~Woqbs%G z7}nt_ubgVxM;?)zY|P`hpFZY`(y@OW_hV?XM{`5{MN^!0&};G|$I$@+p{i2;IoB8- z9UGTB6*>SEh7|qHazPl2tT-V>_!!33ZDD2j*(5y@^ypF$4kwUn@_hZcddX(LROdml zS)QJjaXob^1tO4Dvl&ZO4@w@C<89rjgzMH9ROfZocg;2JGxs52kAzX8o9NCNS!#)TLw^D{bgu0tXnUPhbPJt~)?;~w2u9&gIV-&9uk!5PEF&$GMLd~Z)i`IxtR!$rxq35OQeeJ9H?&vF7^(43rw zT{Un@E{qtTMs*u0PuVj+wsxrAwzn_)<75T#3R@Ks!n#`*cJ=!6!hp>%TeAdb^ z_O5HGQyaI0dWfF>aT`R)oVhub_{3fVc@)2jw8=v0rj;ge!xUX*J0(u|Nn)8Qm}X$XJpGZe5KPZ=e6 zNeWi3OL;KTecPwg_wXwIm>KW?NPAP73PSvX6QzEq*XIt-i1l<&7h)a!_f zv6RzrjLYFo#>ftIL{qs&qL-7Y|KT`=ggp`iRX%N*LPBYa%4fnUFz=P67;OrEW*a>r z7H+wNn-(Qr4^eeegesSNB&sN?kgjlFVN@QzRDyP8SCkpeDf>a|^7zC#2kZjiqIY%B zQg$WhmuL^1^F1v1bsevxZru#tc0>{d6w~5C?5pFu%TL^4SN(v-d)~;+kC0gGgdYy3 zmzads&r9t&A9Y!rSr``Y0SpEIB7No%v%O;I-#7X-@F8Oe%~GZ+J|gw-+k}7{CPsikl1}@ z!xP6u$zY{sgL6$yp_&B*P-kz+cTU!v#m$2<3!70WCaJ~Cf5)OA?BQqv<3oucd*v12 zON_tHDaR{*2fj3>!K-?oZSz=L54^XrR-VN>#|vRPybCfwxxf7=SPiEXo*aRLo#FjBRKpn*_R81XBDF z$Ab)pE6&J1e!qNo3_7y1)ltv%SB^!-abC$v1~e{1Xx1|C0xM_9z~$=(s*GH8L;i5@ zQHVm*xHNvzKZ4n&XaC^)ILI@4GMuP-aad%o+myf+!)@fdL0NaHRAluo=2Hpzrj2In zBj5jXIrPf?!_}Rf9HVaL8)yEOQ+hiUw9`wIc=R&;-MR}~peRwHPT=T6jAOn1%^y2~ znZ_urSQA$h@v5Y9eWszuI>a`-EcyEW*p(8YLQ-)rDMISpHkHc6+yDvrSn!S{evhC2 za(p!eZ9N-9ev^sWf= z58M^;Gbvy)RmY^-qk(=;hox(0k|DRmCoxqz3v9it#qFE6venk(#exLTW(DHD+mM<# z=dC)bLCl6ZY^EetlswD|%L*~0-~hNp7kC-&q z3Skz_Vw)jNfTO9G(_i!hqM&|pEF{LeS*@qS@TbIcFk=2Yg>+1ASQa1q9S8WOKCILrEu7)aGJe=Bj8?;jKuZNF{BoH)v!*%8AsY{RB%lz{iBn{&ox zJ^9yc#3}B|j)%vNABN9qO>%Evc_~U^oLCLq$cc;A2*UQUf^5!YTNPX?=x&nm6SD&r zwDwkwiPj_}PB-PHc9^zDtA=bBL34KQGAGCm?e#lA>eZYurvXnx~!JX+qAs zoVqopF&dpQ*o6xY;HcA<*&^dZw-Q^6?ju{U0f(iAuw$5mZ4~IFNTNx=Xf~!yCmnN8 z1h2atD^*e*)f$&?%zgzuv=;}#k!j_vYRq#^5gE4=(*gJg?v zV!J42%RUy%%3um7zzJ-Pz*g#&;u0BP$9SE&8I`+i0%b3SleiA`iL7s@Qx?--O}sVu z1D44Dy&p@%%7;#{A+mS83vJp)}p&Xkv zRkFH;ITk_B_S48?KdX6)y8%iqE`7T~q4^u)`brsHJ^G@i&U0Qc_lc(4YFJ7&Jvvd; zez3)kYZ}Y^c%fns3J@#0a8`FlEOazQ%;T3+-!Yz%U)4g0NPU2+WPh@cF;&$iGil5Y zw8^tZhhx?2VNe;|B)`al@x(^kR8s(NvCS5T;_iXfM?U5Cpwi* z`&V^2=}%->?s@&`$c(%PT)gL5J?+@ne1mmLC!na#D=RA#j{Q&;@y_V>sLMBl)z8^M z_evHr+5|^DgPj|}-MhEk&u&9qy=!LZMU0X(&y`{^Bg8D^fskIa25zbsDR!vliqX;_ zSYO|Roa?Jo8%P+ICW0l`8OyqyMSYpiU_6uNR0{6BwoCY#b=hZKz+QPb$Cu@BwIkUJ z1`TcFT4MeyL=7bByq#MA9or$)CCJn8sUhh2{EXd_4lmL`DdBno6&#JDy#K=`q585IC=WfPd`|^ z_fPTKkh6XsgX#uu>y!R$b@BcJql{pisRUnCgO)akJ=bzff|i1v1UXKW0>49L=e%k< z!%Y%xHI3U`A!M^oW;6yJAgWzktwoaMv}!PkJGGr>O}XV_cBm$@?61alsMgU&Eb|`F zB+e*EPdJi0IdqTo#9r#ScH%i-Ri|TDSZ_TOpFBQ~-Yr@iS82;;Jsg(R$5$to)nSTt z?B^wo#19oy2xYbBzx56^w&qI~nxEfcIu1*#i`VQNR}D73antS@== zY3QOIW5haxUfFQG-z0R4m}B4|)M-_7(kkYj31cHa2H|i63RLL}ZWz&5t5UZW^+w|2 zu7XUskE-B4yo&)^Dv0S6l$e88L-{5O2#5A{-kl%v4aaP${R)VicD&Ln8=cx9ch>FbwTrA_Ll>wUG^= zDM`me?S|Ml(4_98yp)I}hC`4Dz(64)t9jCa| z0bt`p=yJmyTD3ZEIGzJ~Dvs;L_y+3b-7M)a=dL4B9nVb2XSEgI-SS4}B99UB|^KDy#AR z{dRhIoVjCXB4$ymmd}3%v2%(-^@5{CDm!<*zMOM3F^=}7(G8AZq8qB($19lVGL~ZO zmKjeG{vDr9vk4o>F$~HBixN_Ux*s|0B-_x*1a)=5HwPM#uFR|Hb`i(Q9ZxM$17ewa@VOfymv z+&0 z4dI>u{`9>QEtgu~g!J)_53ZZV(`}vFAN%8Y$`g6i%e)0({!M4gRf0Bwy!ZbI|X@#suwtiHW{JHgv?WmqD}P~d{1YQT9gyW&z>gz zh(GYz!#94*oqziq@?Q0*tdaUkv{b3cnZ~({BIcHRxp4*t3vpg?b{$3Qo1@|H7vtXk z{cZIsZs9dzl>7Mpxo)dcUxwQ*=CCIzdxQvh9M4lDWayzGXxgb4!!XYIMsJ>?1O@^V z?p2DQ?tvD>`>~6lKq-Yd@`HCy>MqMWY2XiivkKtgg9igmnED2I_Um?Mm3&!+r4}+F z7qPse?eO46|GvvbeX5Bst9N0v&}!+8^zdcjo(YUEZdXw}5C@u-sj4RW;9K3_p<}l> zxkW~LG4Wg|{Am*m=ERe$$4E*^IW|km6uBNc3~4+xdfw#sz&c|#3&e*#Y7+{K;uMId zLvW_CPt_Q*{O!iNw}c|8yeOAxTV=D9`*ge7N8RcNpiet?V3mX43c}SZ@7Y#G*PhIL zS=`fIxdGPzxkmA>Rp`r^F0AxuCCMYf_u?N$>$bTce%HFSCf-JN6VLxSA4Q@^XV2xx zb1`>b<=&iGB?J@A`mGQbhpp*Mh=2)Irdih;;1(R#?Cszvhg}@toZ4~Cz%xEMllGnQ zdHvU2opwbF+)>q88Nno%pT;_kMeVUw2CYGY`VBm$lr%!Ou3*j`2JmipCcAPZXS{+w zFBXBBXpW`a1G$1Lml(+LvW%WJW{@4a1A6n zIXMovb9C1EWvkeovUypKdqNepj%S9Ls@~rQFnKfx?M2r@1+Cfhv{~66LEW6E@VZXa zF~jH^&emTqp6g8rqi|TC<3{oZ$<=uO69+8n@2`za9u zf1$J6fKn$IC|+lI%}FjH;?i4TNv@TzP(UqGLS@0kvRiv=1203=BcKNm$ z>MzR>P1xqga{bM?)e2mFUfWxKlz#WCwY~OK?`-;m2EPMCN&K{5{NRHh#Gm5h>IVG# zwllqI+b_4F`|@+VIsQ?#{>2Y|%s+3!Hm=hbU;Ms2)vNsCi!c7r7C-&Thd=r87f(O< z=}&(4^uv!n`YT;}{hZHuA^IsloIkWXAH|QK{Ork7+Qi?d{se{Trm6lrroC=Dru%9( zH?+{clc9Y3(ce2Rurfd^W4koiy7AwC0Wm^%NST6pqqPNXR z?*A4>=~d#o=Vof!A&B*JOxJM9pEN^t@|XX)u6749`iI&Si}#*>^jAN+OGNF^OY&=~ zbo~wtriUS2KJbcs_`&-^WjBHH#0?B>M=wrd7UOp^xpGbubQPwlMT$Ub570eEsdY|n zSI+rOljurU%6`vi*OCr{A;p_sMN#Uj!VGmL%s?DDKK&Z)2T}HlC*j+FJ#INqFXkP4 z$lv}4>U==YP&%%u_>e)mmP82nTuh4>C7-3eEw%iCeL~lL%|0sYfgzJ3KQ=$9CMIt65$vc|YFK?L6}1dPbOR@t;=|ktAB%$Ms~j z9!V48DKa0GX(WKsx&qmD^nln33s6l&XQN$Xi~AH2F~@S>8EDzmz^pbZMb z(?w;MI<6fj2&z6Fv#pIDu*9803)-soWTS=(!H81!sb!2Ga30U4m@h;gBGo;?eUIIq zkm~q<{_#&)tvvp8;JWM~&0V6c-L_~t^wgT?3~munf@9>}g!-ZfPMy`>Xj?A7S(^@e zFU<{ny!n%DWP6~}7L_LXT zBbVKrVsJ*)Cb(pkzKo@3X&Pza1`(hqi%$?=OC=Sgv3%l<97L4DTN%b*Olt2j1^0~m zZsiQTk8_bb41I`m8tYd2y`=wmJ3g)NzghsNzhmnaH?7$6X$EeYQF_}V0lZ#z@z}3~ zD(3Qa%hqO9%E~r8Q6(!b=a=8qia|g&*XPADzDn&`6B&FLQ32Pl)$Lu|!;I%Uj#e%) zdHD79DsoDw3)=K-9yXJE4AMh4!&bMIXeTQrP{NU_?@=M#_zOIDf#R_58(%z&2KVcU zs$tH2$*trOhkX0zkKfjb)NQdYV<5-PJH{pRcPHQe>$iVCwo9>j3?aGl zfn2q>n&<;yFyg)VaH%ZNA6{JkpFtoEsIgm}?+>8LTV}70(UJBsf||W3?(h>3LkyWs zNA9CuRaFeBq-3I(_)~(lS%6~EZyKi=F8_U)z9D~GnjoV{XFWhzibNG4-xALuOLwKN z32xCBWv*HHcphOuZ}Vjfn<3gjj3bb<-P&|ML~D6nb{Vj3RF7drUqnK(g)*=jh##bl z%g{TFMSN=fd&1X8O@?`*V;nWa@PuHt7|S8qmo_!x$l3?%_vG6@fBPSc_bi6|Z}ED5 zo`sR{8HJRF2+gWF# zZ%ws0tzIEeiT~mZEqf8fa|9#n!=}VkuCUnXI8v?j3{w@Cf5|$>n*YRa@GmRrWvGNQ z<>6%E(e6dY1)*N+F1+l6%e*EP=x7G2JDLiIJ|fg*XK*@pcd+Ll@`mSaEf_KF11P(P zrdn#vgx*iC(?;For%6F<8Uu!XG%m{gTZ%UB&qAnEnMwifT^*_i;B;oq_h-N=2&hXzbrIdaj{Vrw837G}QcTN~R42l0X#*3= zWwi%q874y6^X6M3Z6f5=3|F#{A5QAg78w^$-_3mxc zA@8s2;50|RFmnOb=(gFAh5Y#Pn@Jhox*k47OqHQ_JfjlFyFE$a^4XHQWt*FJWpXRZ z39%(LzjHix?NP)5aL4+O+U=ZBkbr+mcRsAw}$CGSJq$)qE;spX(O#`b{wSK~+ z=;?>=KY8nob8jKmCkVrrM;AHwp2NGQ)MRj|XbJ@OG>Axjf;aiLLuqf=IpE#`heful z9CfKDJztTFYRZD5to&)*=|9EBh%EkQc7o$}w7)Y9XiU(FX#;rBlz0>cg)$Es87lUa;IM^^87P+e zJa3v5Z%J174uav|;20#84#)cxjwz!H@hK$221@}t;pK?CTg-h$U$W956Km+9M2k>> z-@`~b6XIS`d({>Q>UEh=tG6^YKK$VQE6BWwoK@j@g0+NM(waA^;W=!&Fui3A$i%Nx zggIa7a96d7AX|=5i_wC?iYrh!;bDEwzswHZLmWkQ8&#MUxL`x&L`*ONMw$?$Lf?4% zSoR?)OSl+1sUj&DC7q4&UCkrokgh$idJq&^;)l7rYY^9(tr9||wD0#361*At9;UpdM3d(G!&X7P7bg<}Hy}A;7r!r-XHp3d>OgkEPhVRL~ zihgojJkpaZ1oUK{$XSn?TvWaCEDH8Yg2Tj5zIdM5&SnBl+XPhl3wZn5yw(k+U?nOh zGIHve8@pc`o1Y%%Qb>ZO(M2&}=G6e31q$6PV1Fk|KaY>W>>2pKi7&5&+ij7E#n&JNh{@-Z#pNHf?%4S#4G#=& zbrio~f2O;6aJn=m1Ur2n?;{8}DuGRPg-ay~o-VaUDRhA|Ei?XVV#JzJc0XAtDl1+l zuT~V@rPzd#rG_P|7Y;|%S3Bj}vC#5WJfdZu6!xWP*6YAXMwc|lkAY%7zTcM#f-FX% zxrY&v-1qw4upqUv`E;8Q4V^S3h0h-(L>>#VhpV1tdiPOP5Y|ie=1w&Oy;B*nDgp@% za9TV!#@-AoeXDkgr_!8L0j0=Gzm;eL(NN6mghNHH*EM6MJ{4B*FOud99cGKs+U_x0 zU^_D`DdOM&G^Da;90n&C?oHV*j?|6t-#-Why$fW3SjbFM65E{AnOyFgGWXS~N|si0 z*@<^C*1Z8POBR7dJwZxR-QmZ^ci4=xzl11u?8H~FW%fhOB!gdqduYb99N%#woLofL z+ojKRdv+~cI@eJqPMJt86(&{=i&-4}^Lz2O@dkHgr^Ei3MwNdNMQf?Kn-f;*$TAO6 zJ=bDytc%a(hu2kjd<;t2O&1ty&-{Rck z;V4RC!&_1x^46mv+m(grav6H1Hv%iy>gtJa@NwHH#}%o{JkwJuf6agP0FP4+X0C(49-C>%tGvk4t1gXn!M z84N2yk)Kvgg`>IUEO(N81*WT-@?QVLO75;i-Q}{MlxNJ?U1huqeGLO6pD7Dhv&V3rBAe!<>ATuj0IuBy|qi$Q>bfe}m| zxU3a7;vHC{2jl5p?AvM?`b9co?%&sq;d!alU4J2jRc^3pKdw;KAIck!8YBrrXv*qU z@e5-ip@u4vV?9L)^>b(qdOEZoeJb*F4`;JW+vZv-!&>Ab;0-pFOc;gjs@jZ~|3(Um z&NvYvpU_uAzmJcZJmk_|pQlSA(QFa4E963^qx#__ud2R*>doOc(qA9arQ^VDsc zL_AEm#4zCkyqlO|j9HLzD8+UM{2)5yNvj|ot#83#fiWmRX+Y%kl;R5_2xSA@y6zarQu(}^b5vACeMNRtcqP(*2%AF11}Pk^MmH^%`AgSDpJ0 z5ObNL1W3T3F9Y3}&>zt+8GGM*&&)g`a;Zvp%gUqHIOF+L!v$b z{n!Xg-tG6h8U02rD1)kqF1PbgwOO}cT4G*70%e>b)ugJO6M@1@@@OAL)nSPi*L2pa zwFDTI&DMDEbp*vrTu26Gi(v0jAX5U$Won;fl#X3~<_T`Th^5Y5$o?NGC84!_OK+T( zjj4Hy?Qst5D~f9+v}Aafg>?ntdPTajsy$`~XALDzp2T2%l+~PhKgPNop)4@Fn)z7# zV^iCpLsU1LGDcpfsnMUL+fK)?;2XZ-_JW9Y^bkn2{U7jTX1=tyb2XVn`2Obi^11o0 z++@GD7bmO|GV4O5F6~g80VqC`yW0NDusmf}4Sk~K@)PMU`_29jpL}{UW*W@=7=k`w z91e(x*>UU_O>P*KY5Cx@1Vd4X+Q^AE?uLAC+^N|c9-Wh%j4Q(>>+8k`NRZ=lN9mc# zzoQ(}pf6~83y+Vi_;1D?#eZYkErr*0II~wLYBr*{Pj?n^MsdVr@_VBC!M=r8viKjHb^i_=9Q`>XR6w)*lVjK*?_UK5XS=0@= z{sgQvhT5Q2){Q{#X>J^T0W}(tXKr6YfIXA(Z;!Jbh0xAr09b+zH~Cu2?zATO5reu& z0Z^JOrX!;xS*UP32wgIv?{J`KNs5vDS6j0tLAwaO?zSblBGHJh?mhE19+2>WdJ#kK zMqnm%&-1HI-)O&~oX15MXuOdafcxy(m;HFw(~{QiW{yV2J6XSb)u`B^Y}E{HUEYR( zbN8no3|sD@iIlcOOAbu2Lt~=80lM5Wh)Wb*aO)N9U* zDO=Dfjr$vIBmIb&6iAc8Q@LH#FY4XaS_M$s_U+&JZIF65zY}i=zc;MB`KWz2EzsYi zU%$=*{pYu_Kz~pE@a-QYS)jj?=MZ#UJm6#3wLf7zUu9$Yv`)st{X^lH;hsg1*jTP z>oeoYjAHl%K$ z#+$iP2A<5?didPBXSH72)=L~@Uzao`r@nyRxK0e>Hyg>{vsxTbIdnh%X&v8 z-}=Y^maysqMNf{o_OW4_9Dc%01;mE941oSalHypo#LOoEI~|7`b51Wa;WPWjt?A!u z`Tl~g&lO+wT4JwTuNUrJXD`mm+C0rZsk6_z&hVGQ!_KE@(@knt|NgW0J~~+hCv*0y zM`p1j(9PPdWGrb;WKLC$m9?Av66$0a*|8}zT70o&9SfDL1_UxdcZg+?N0KG(``99) z+z~?ES+i-@lp8I?T-PFpZnY6g8f4u#jCEo3>;Wkq3-#3uN_5W&`Xwx(0!+-iSoR-( zYnOlGSEd(-D4~(|3jzqzfVgme{w=^_A+auuD z{aG6bR3KaoRgb?#(DcmwQkAeIs0ZQUFpu>COFyv<*~OIPRSX=QK62i@C0r&t*J zP+-=Kb`kn3wN5GTerMjPd9R+a*5mtZ?Ww=$8+g(;uj{uc?e`9_JN)tIdr9M)@X+rXpaA2fWTX^YD;DiIF|BDL z9i@ajm{^B^j^Qz#2JLlRz*{te`J}#HoA9dF@u_L<64$u!us|+wOF}_p6{~ONPJ8YRs5p1M-hJKb z2XoQqLt7SQ-ke4d+?p2MUG6~DoY9v8CkfUpl~24i!{EcyhnU`0{tW5Di~!9wv8I$L zss&hCi-Cl=5X4nc#0WM(*_15QDH-pb&!&E_oqU)5^_Dfr;pLnnqqQ zixx~e7`MVAQJtF!^)>J$&4q_-T{X*VX8!TzFk06w1Mw+#XX67B3i&kjB<`uAdx>R~ zP3u&4<)6D^|BW1Oi--^tO&rp2Dm~GIMjGwqYp+aNfbC1R0Gdnbz$7ADQ`&Y^(gZ3v znt5^krq+uh&*gH)f;nkj*(#unP9+1~^Eat>rd=Si$M0cP@IfjN0ZN&h&_Go?po6Bf z?Zv8a|2G20cULAsOwDg%p4eV+K}kBZqsqbqp=Z6t;}^1RdRCB1Koq#*(Ys{ttfAIY zlBhK6Dk>oGOX+Te#=b>UVp=q_3_tEE$c>2WWHC|qe%eOU&Jr1mu)m@L0mJ_;G_Ij0 zU(r!kx?Pec%Is?zZHKDUG7Gv!X0=jM>03H4-L(|#(g`C++HTL3in9gi zASq3am7>rdD+7&fe0(L^Z2TsYBF=`*lHffO)0>85=S?v@D=CT*b@D+ZX>c0lLD zCHvm0LNKEAW%u9!62&l;kQ)RHcqcItzq+AYJo5}Psc8Cwtw4O$hqojZ+{Pa)Yt*ix zU`4OLkLcrst{@Q3HPGhiSNxb_=fM%=0dx<^301xfv%n!t%RC&EjQ^l3L(;M*9Lwk>bMC*`! zJ81N7T26Hb>fNndYDbMSlKG3+czsR|i5y2}TeIm7;m<^LibjsdnXI50GBmgbX&@e8 z$RcF1mAV%ZBG6UKetvT;DM{QxQ`1$NfzcBp>?01BBq`McI>B~gg6#6*Q_x9g^RUY0 z1Z)u2x8~fP)l4Kl7~pzPA1fEo&jhrej9Jpe6^5eC`jGG6oI^2G`sR*XP4PLTOVZ=_ z?kPHMsKptL1_ZBkR(7mO6jGv~#hS3iFgrtb&sjFE{|bnF3*3pDn-PeoHtgWXut^ru zonb@$DiSl&LyQu0PfK=xcBIkeP77TA1Jdan2_t&wL$YoMy+OQh+Q-IAA0>$)RdDvW zaSr{!NS@gfk0akp6i%+4o;|oed-g=q$4GGMCM)Y=F{T7$<^DwCCasPeF6Ii%2L7;rDbm&lYEBjPxbo?Us0wVVzW?e@~c*^QkqygvK% zgXN7<25@z3x&$qzrnI*b-IX;1zsP4IXBNh6>^$fSFq80i2pC0<0{nEKc8w>+S| z<1DLtn*D|!{NeL%E$BF^Nan3$RAr9~Pl0jz5}A@KNMfo^R0aw0RU3fb&J$D%W?-n;b0iSHAgMt$9VrimmI5iBp}^2!?se%xj@eDwCm38 zQ62~gLpoNYPnh|1!xo#6H=x%}4A;q|;L9Is3PddnnCP*d>wdl-+R%~s7R1sMag-DX71lHBQRT&qy zsAU)OFe4Fayo>1l=PpH5`pEUXvBzHjDi0dGH!)sni+h1l0V!ZMQaJ4M)UwEYI#sl? zDgg$$4=gb_?E*-}UL8U}>b>r^Xc;;fFT2J0SvBl z+Xs6R^y~x-J@0cEo0d!B>{2zmGI>A3B8+mlQ3WgEtuyrYb$*^G(6ZVRW-D% z4Khhz@y5UZS(i6U(=M|2pS|~slg0dU?Rg{FqprS{S+?aI*w?FIErZuP*qV#Zka3k* zJ|sM}D42c1h6mYKxQrw>?+%pTv^;pEq&jjuV=BPVmzCQbYxhPPF3E|qfbVe>JC#`+ zp-elowipEmYmC{K&!O>7)%@crMdKvT&vYI8NOj7!i6x`5RXeN=8TyZ7ut?eHNOG;2A=k`x82M)D3@3UXKMNfyG zulZdng_H69XV0FUEcAeki;d)I)~Dr~rbO8nF5P!`LAt!z=fg7lWJM2#Zp5WS8`Cwb zM02y3+?jNN;PN$Wg8;0ygK$u|!YBAwPx7b-Qrz6XV}3wRg+kqj{@rcm)+Ry~zZ@?A z*+t!uii`vKDByLnr|70PDe3|`2v(YuvU$Nh9~ zvssa-mNZ?-REn2Vpxn3t#0v1tXzC6d#t%pg=zrG2`hLB@Y*daeWLYxM(V*XT`p7Ds19d|1mA7qum(Ul8Mg+wlWQdlWAK&(y;LE6iEVQ z!cOO}zGN4T%m2ORj*z?K?1mQ2z4_?Ag%I9kFNK^@%I(%>zb?<3p?rld?1$V?1Ehy` zIeU$!U83P26n*_|n+g>u=AoUcbHE|uaNh26D0f9Q0X?2(Uyu&eC=ZA!-mN{SRL^J6 z&9ITYZT@586Ai_8>e+lPPBblg2+J-9?m zF|yTgkKK|1OCQ>g!z+}e-Z;I`PNbSMKujrQ;o|O*a7D*`DzU+6PDAOE=FmYKn95-A zsiF}gq#{c~wBXGsXm9p}o@KA4>ZDqJNoi`Dhmqt4Tf2oXcBF+6rSF6-?o>CCN(9=g z`fm>dPQ|kWiz}8NxM1aA8^CN@M^o6-&b&wX(KW|lWG@4u#ynSW>E~TxoL@znWV{mr z=4NN($Y;^L9!5SwH_?n8V`6ytwO$5~zq!9E*`NFft(cZOZQ?*1ge-7B6sZ|>G0sb> z?S{>2=Cp;mD%^y|W`qXt801Y^Q%8nc8bmHAjl1-gw+FZDy7srqP|u`Vtr3XD0uyGRq_YmLomv zMe6(ASho;zF-0VMgS=0sikCh4ve}jOcT^HQd;cW)y@%QuwkumYLD#9vbghG=sX?i; zwtW~stEWmYEfnv2v!jbGxam@trc#6l?@Z|*4N0v6sZ)bdefEXWH03sadVGCsAfEq*Er=tq$-topR5g`ypeoCK7ctJFGj~fT&18U5F%mJ@q_V_oKs#t zmAZr4;+s9E7S!rd(}RpCEO{!Vt@lbrDUooAV}Ms8mzhON_E(1_ACK57klk^OGWKQ+ z+5drpn3vN*eerT&f(%x3F@Wp%aMIsT*}Zt+4nuAzF<@vgd@G?MXDZv`U+g$=V= zx~*8@2w9{iLy3?3*yxuCw?jAm!qFzf5r0k0I4P{urFO+S`tQ!<< z;=dFe7GuVc(Sn=;PK{Lbdq#9B42EbYt{7KFJ(-VhO-DsL^rKB11QPrg2>0V2CpD~a z!TM9PM!p~%F_O`8Yq0P=zL@rwoR=D&FtKDYOSY^bA^1!Lg{7y9Mg#=5t7d)bzPnX> zW=@rXaf!IMbrR}#&n)F6#^XB+2v2HW?#wr*nG^2KPij42HO(E)EmPGE9qeF(zNv_Z z^SM(ro3fr-NqmZ4)tqCsyCnb$sW zSDPE@`;4bfrT#d>vsxR#S=2)s7%+pQ*QF*d6jw2>>v~Or39$3sON#H7kxC;Wq_Hsm zs7oFXDyF%-sopL)akG~@dnZw`r=KtqvA(wlbjX}@acRr)?VO+Wz(7$)QD&+8Sb0A3 z$$9<4wlZzCEy1Q#k4_{*HLn!F{i@uzXz|D?#>FjSdc(FVBbU`33E45}NH_~fU&a4L zu_4Gxm|BPSDpR&e2xdIY8G*MtTT$+BM?Sy{e8Hm;rMtyvFg<}T5IU4{AkOPOzUNa} z6{7K@GtK!h#EJRnj7Eb}6lJZ%2T^W=m)t2tZJe;Rw5Hj%Wr%^H+*4ul3DWknVZ$(Y z+m9I4%=Z8ZMSPec+`s2 zgiiUj^u2)mBrzPF>tJGeXvXn0`(1n0fO*>tbQ-hxUZff)3Mt=186JW=WN@sO4sDYW$EE-ysn1R%$U6u#b1>ZO(oXDH0v-lQOkVX?0>RdY0&4Ro2hwd)Izw>45J zTeomq9=y0&MX$3jMO5rvdkeoCIKNpLw~EYZf9i6YkpwHTRZ&Q5`3y}oAlw(DpA51T zoe^<;tq*E1my{-bU&LnQi)`Z5aq4y$bkE%Xf!-7-TL-a~Fa`9;>2Ao;+ociAjMOH< zc%%<(fvXzby5-5y-%_R(SuXV$F{M6Fwm#r72@#i{+u&qwV%QnKH14^XdsIfL` zmky1-J~~U}a>i8#oz)^bV6}rKf|Zd?p{o{qp!mk7CGHb@M2gn~pu zWS3PxSFv+LH}eDBR;KHP;1eH|X}TLpZgB;&C_jG)tFkWNcqXwA!I1vJp#YpnGHF7^ zhx^E)n<)tKDZ&x~0AOha!m%9#jJoH{b@Mw9}W`ii;64+dLICfoi-3CwUF+mrjGVHRsh`>Oo+1^Lzp;3 zV2#s+TIjkG*{Z85g?3T`L55z_#`gF`jMs8XB$%>jIDO^h|Ja!MAi+}GD1$MVyH=jv zfip+nR{$wcZYrMVNip2D=|)hixsx&4JYr%aGX*I2;_T+K9T7+%`+6Yqz*M-`?Xq;s za&2`&wV!m3j=*V(`TH#+kN?TvbLzp$8e>yetVV6uEVA>VEen;Xjzm|ybN3cHCB3Fg z`%#gb%WY&x_A&@KP*^aP3x-TOA>2KdlUru|vzvjEB$xY79MQgZTZWPnY8Wr(AG@V* z{0E`(8>Ek>fF~Xzetp1;&#@gUxyjEazY-Dt7z9Pd60urcWMhP(O7Lf2iZ8v+6|^kn zRQ5d9J)F}^bQd=I@EBAKw7&3`GV&&X2^-WfQcYmYaltH@V=y-#Z3X^i5`yUn(4|)8R zC>xIrDJplKBVnf2!mGTZPA;bq+~JvDm^8{K(}ZK&KfWWTXjo#9n?jPxV5>-OxlinF z{csUjTf2dzLYT{2FgIlKfkn_!u|&I#+0<+mq}jvOJQ3ur77$#iZsSjWnkm3blt_BQ zpS$B~;lI!az){WUhpwpxu&iX+3R+gcl2YTJlbkaH8C~^n$~BAAaFY;v5_8vH+%fdh zpZmGpOSQgn?}88jbvYJNSjbl>M-%Zo{nB-y0FMJmREd3K)fJwaH07EhVy?`Dl{LQUU0Gxgei+An|h>}T#@ZoRiX{r7dPs%6uBw=wN^U(*k}Un+}V z{_KPI>DOzsaqs5aZ~tIda+TkH`|USP{__ui@!?;8``)vkfB4aRzxep$zn0f6pYs_m zL_X!O_7}?AfW1F>`q9%5Fz)-iE0^Gn3yZXZ2@&oA&hB+p)Fo^6Yk9LK&B5J`)7Go@ z&3i*i>MgG@lv-n{#LcW!-`$lE2*D5PC(yRAEmo@T$cZEe~j z``TsBYvPcACEhbPgAhDq2WWckoKkK`DF>ahErr95GF>~u%72>lDULWLRA^|f`9+e) z`sBTjKmPC}J0Ch=bkcg?{+|9MvYv{(y^-S}^G%b8J|SbI|NPUR-+%T#iQ2DbcZ2%#l*e1LzroU-bx(G#=B&;Y&JA{YPRL|WtbvHm0 z9>io0|EVBW<`N^BV|ps#FGj@v>pO0fS2ANvkQ5b}nBkr`RQ0(#I;YMgTR+Vr0P}$K zN-zJEwRXu5MvD>`aL;IL$r|GpYCm9J^*|pe;cFmwFG3_J2Yqpv%AcX%q;gi`QPPik z&P+lZN|}t)Mr>-A{70fi30KglAR{HQx%{NB_DrDz8VeV+8j_T|d|g;EBT^s8MOIb< zXq5&+%EHkk3FJ3WO()mHHEEQ6=Evg8dE5AIVPd0bHg?*-iiJmX8_{^AD$R$Aj-cb1 z8Eg{I)|sOq52|&cE>RO~!KW+DPqZ6E$~25*-x$uB*x(Z)=%P`HQ=1CTl1^+F2sYpr zBAIm0*i`vY2^VGuLz{v=dBwnIO6ckLT>*3RP=9i*y#b0K-M(69l3hoG646{2Wav27 zZ@Y{9Oq)1CLv9hW$Xc1pM@Z1V00Z3orY$lIwVmaj5Fq~ z$W%~%D)2*@706F>q-YYa6aRbcV}z^4FCK)4fLMGuiOUN{7W?oK#}-Q5;j!w23V2Y7 zSNnQ2#YwWpLpC4+XB1TkL0aw_RvsdTer>9Y&hCi{{K2}vLB)2j5TRQ${N3Sla zr}lvg7mRJzPfLBcbwGS!1SZVTF$9`pQ*w1?wEp3xNHP zAfs0BWys0l{$!E*5ye~#o26E0E9em00S){lg3Ws^%~~WRbMhAC{KKqPT<*FruPV;; zx%J<%7%hXtM2P+bp|8OhvKiQfJM|-ui|{U(%OvEFWlu(=u11C>@z)9)D4>edwToDb z+MfzYxkep{lZR7`|JIZp)`ZFxu*5yNrPrnPhaOL;J1N=G<6nSb=!0#cN2dor>dA3# zFx4XhcLU#LLG<~#PRg~H5;&!Dxs^y~ohgLZJ*%(iT&l&OniQkmvqe|+QxeQ8%-neQ zNYAXb8;mKSV^(&_v>W}17u}5#4@30y;Hu}j-l_AdP&_0|cu%TEC50k) z1mJXlP*%$p1`YKzDrB5vqb2xS$=SC19b z-4h)g&ALhNXO%2MqZ*GuTCfbxO1w|DrazPZg{IA^Siw;D5OEVPZ$Jxh2y>L<7!KJ- zW=Tz)UN!h`{nVy4z&T)JsL>qHH4}BejwsP{YeCEaxS4pmLL1`A!8IGU&&%@4xR^k@ zbYohecuoR>DtubP1u9+8)54za%3UHt!V{M%oQZMzf)r`a_`m$n?L?cj_wXd>%4l3S zwOP$o&*G?dwHhuiw5NqE0SbR=QV|k?6P|V2$oB%RAFS6PCdXxFO|v_Wj4mM2ea40r zEYvmcv2grBxb$aDRxorO!sZ;dQS6F^$BJ=NXhfBrdBt3F*u@$|V9k$`lQcnJ*o`j7 z;JJgkjW0BHat~1cp=ND9&*3bVWS8iqT-;#8GXpSWP4vwqn{L*ur?QOj+u7R1lWFhg zj%dfDEYfHGd)Kf?-|~`=_d@QTFT{`J%j;*Wb0#OZ>B&xdvsaBu;x-SR1TN3Ke7ytf zT@Db~Mgp5oNaMCCQ_~{ z4%!Dc#IdK@m!f6D__X}ocy^$2?Z>M z#!;7b4DO;CU4p$bE?6kTDtp7CrvaJe*XatrR3;6_`f2u+X~&b4(RfFsgTpw5P1%q4 zyZ8I}-bMX~yfvLRMna(+*TYHa-CoK7h(9{edh!j$JE)qML!xZw`L**Afq7JXsE^_(FaHAji?%4;w-t%j6fT2ACLQfNZp5tF z%mW5@Xw- z1=X3TnldXnm+*7v^b!;>$`gQ2!G4TVDy9>K0baa@p{pRoN1}a;Jr9#;UW<^Yax$0< zWUXPMvJsgb=@HtI;vZ-qvj(8(xuyw0O73@0asB}WownBYX(@HX3@ljIihnG9pM+ zV46sZY0R0Ts&XL0Wl^q3o2lzfAK_!trt2b`>K)F&ZU|vYyQKs&PShd7fYH<}X%CG% zvn+d9NpKGfsHK%zwhZP`;<&JpS*d}08)}0y9$E(DjYz?s6og+6P03i-a-?8S7Vulu zkkE7_aY>aX&8Xs4dk=T2tI0anL)HB{>h%+sWZ}OD zez!Y)mMxXKh59I$G1WnAX|Dvz_<4Nj_oPM4KRK@{hb+v*HDTgB+pJ*ge1-Se*f8f&raAbLW{bVg+(;sYy<=6T{JpHD{yH+ z-(x=Ar~*=kRa_v^gc&Yetu4y7T;sp}3|YZ;u^k%VO5lE~lcP2~=I1;n=eCdfdI^{3 z7J}|b=hG~@g!iVM9(Q&;x_eWv;!|vVo~eGwC3_(dvqExLwOnaMV0sxY zKA+z?GVyT(3;V^mu398+wrO*t8u~QxnTFxYN}u&@UZeYwt zv-xs8Bvh=a8_#g1+MgACh`VxTHrs#|AUm_m|3_!kdBd5wPdCSUx3+yc?^FAV>MT}YUnL+kSjMLgTaZl zeYLF``kho>n=hc*s)9O6GhQlCxScOimx0ghvX!Q<@6m+XrNY&Wnp~7o6_Bmet1aa1 zE&{_tC70kT3rS^q&#kR@P02Fb_8LqSa_A>CGdb&KYwLGFh|OEuE5=PY6oq1}j;cvW3B=U1`$2&D(=Jt|l2l!sGSe_+}x!P(fm0tmMqrdRuzx??9D2fG! zn3v1^@%tbDJ>?wc`0}{Q{PNmX?qq)*=9kFyb&a}o13p3fR%E2sW2$uojB+n-#{eY~ z|7YZnR}W6QeyNZ1D&jSyDWQ%^%Pz2Pnej>#eOl90>bENP&!D-EtNm`gA{TqUfSz~z zfa;u^Sb)>p%0;TcGZrvcCT>J+R^x}ny~|f3ypT$yKe^hs>8ToK2SsXACG$B=e4iGV zfZOy+9(lR1sE{aIu`*!WfrLuq2s&_At1>T1dPF4*L96C^a1r%&Bnpz&q^;1`)J*+| z5=}VF2?qjf!lTQ3$7)S3`^(R)LcY|klg|Fu1d|3ARE7$9Q9&0h=bWxHT{7A(yv%dj4D;g8uG1#F08s+!{_>JhD(j z(tc3#;e1iLcR|70-QcRSuaaSL65ppZSkYGsq^l&$KQ6LJPQFFvzpuuc@|_#DN2BC5 zolv#g$0KKfv`%%Qg%^awY&PNr4%zhlj>jS7Ic3jddsbFW*SP<8U|WLM(#4Z;2&^#A zms#)pBP6I)uZ{R41Yv1cmFL!*>#+m7gcj5jV8XAJLkGM=I3j|CW zS>dg>$h7ci3?vG>ZrKziZ%!%A6un5A zTb?4(^t`SqCiicsB%OUGLshy~_sFG^Ql=Oi<22AFJniLjD?&W8gkn68j%{1_ZslEW zxqMM&D}r)^E4(BN3`Dt_pporfkCcTnX2+7n>m#lq%1^UT2KPC<4NEqZ zePjV>44t|MYzB&B)

`Oo*r?CPO`c{Mif#$>HB@`Iic3T>Y;4 zz)V-S%T4XxPJbM7;~}=kh8F2w9@rF9`LWE_nA$79z6#`H55-mn?6Y&#H<-y)4&7b) zZe??qw;B#v_K&vB=T>U5a;Dt%^WHuTbha!`5V(m}mM#QI)>MyE2F_IdTQMYYTDz9@ z$OTY*tIH}mztznK!&;|n9W*&qJ-Vj4G)Q5E2x%AXS${q^A8EN2th*1v?@EJa4L*~~ z@dBO4hriU4XXhp#wQ*&Y5E!kKb}Ji=DS&gk>vJFel6UIcC?aUg8;##qA<^YxJMdR6 ztm|SMCJR`vM=n#mntg=i))HOPt0j5P8h$D`>Qb^z3}_IAW~6v=>7z}&buT$tt}L$d z**!Wh!+&SI_@E=cdh@u@s+C!QtLi;LA5Fr@(Xi7NQHugx z*x*#j4(BfyVQL}f&KD`~KgH%Y2b(QjRjcF;dvK4XImU8bjy}rLWI)ecOG#`S(IJEm zm#wtb7J62RFj*Z(q&et$n7mPX-3_SPk-5v@zkhjSpH}I4ZPr_)eyNg33ssZDXtN!x zs24I4U-T;5y%?Jl-oEN5WNQ|{aK z0-CD}5u2SWnN9;MkchXgwLe~yzzdt>%{d}qu#rfR{#TO*^S{(-F#L?Pe|!7F`nK7Q zC4cy8xZF}*75GWR4QsFbIIFi&6Ui!Vq^E<;BBKT|b2}7fv(1(^ajs$n=-r)kmWse; zj&t}sdHQ_EeseIcuYq|5 z&2I43KQS7!dLwhWP{vZV3dP187emazq*s`*lQ-(iOJI}pVq|lL(vn92w#)uUPlx93D}M+PzJTLH9qlDYhEx&$y_^8HL4p zv?WzJ^#wjB;o! zO}>H2ck2yz^C)by{l+67UQZZEA}Dt#^b(>WU}ur158w3*cK@_%&L=22^p z!}o_-ZakO_BD;BTz+x09Q0#R8to|Echt&u;j(F0m%)eTs*UOes{(K*$g8r}>PWKve z1@zqL{k7N^IUr0v6z9Q3xmss5*OcYZ-(JV@^=M2FK;cLmk*#ytjxexT;PEpX&+6t- zJIlg#y&e?UY{6ONYk}#L7=NS~&86&1&0e$jrVm*zc6Bb1d&D+MO5wzIzrSDRfPt!D zPI=2h=gEAxm#m+9w;CfAS44>PjU~Q6@FH{8Gye3<(npSr>BgJr^VJP@AqXpnF7Y#Y z3KpW4_Su`GjCt*Ds(}R+6qAOry?n)7R0KP7zC(Oq){-${@}`D3IDh@=0uq);c6QG^ zeg$z#07xW$>a6x0VnNvz$A<|Ve{nEzE)~vKrL)v1MBU@5|HBx6B)w*DlTtLVwqO)W zpzmLAGQpS1X$$75s3h`X^mqN$0@^Asy#T<>XJ(@!e0J9v&&@N(8E&Yg526%my4)Q< ze08c6_(xCjCUyYr;D5$_UupdHyY%olVg7d3BPDx1Z-nG@EHL$Yn};flskGLTB2793 zML94O zFP8uh(DjXkVk&ckRe%P~t~y;>{~T=14i1K;*((bW0)Mw>+Jj)+>It;zXo1h2z?d(S z>AH0nTXjlL$>ri6VX5Wb7M%Njg)MZM+pr*uJk1cTji1d#!7m+UWbntDBYz|V=@t^{ zY4oi>hgpQ-M%~V6KVtM;o+yqSiDBn>{7$!W^GO8`^p5j#{dE{kw^a(_PANmyu-XzN{vf-Hj=46G9u)T{S> zu$z4#owkmav}~_bxqZ}>0$}K>!2zOT7kn<+a8BOeo2Oa1sUFB=5M_hDc)?hO^Yfbn z@8sc{CbU`zoa5*%WryF3Td3C`fB1hMr8neL4eD3yD1~!O?&1iBdZ5xShte8>Sn8R& z)qkhZBcPKgPwlE1AY4#bTe?7LQl<|5x`m%aSC=b?~c{ah=m3 z02)R07$qA4puX=j5P~?MX`Qz!@4Y$7$}Hs1RbRY;wABmHu;C13CT_Ij4sCjoeiDVB za>fog}U*OGXS#AQ;hAMC)Alu+XWH=gA(>co6LpqDo=;$MOg4y zRb$-tIas*Bh|ci&)t!6z!R5M1mG&q{pH9LQo=U}fYW?MZ3g*BI)&!;d7gM_tEc;ap zlk{BGfXfHKiuoc1pd;c8c9h*JQGc{iG-SinMoMPCbJ?Xj7_YE13?Q%rGAg6D_<$bUcfRmP^thoa%-l(>e=32+UgH^*4U<;M21S#cM8BTid_zzU>$*A50l`I2?}Ht>6@ zyKV=;v7HssFU)-!cO!c49vcGM+n{U&!bnO!Xq^!iSmlZ>2=PIe+!}&Hy^<+Y}G#X^<8@1k_^#UegflMDN#MKc+$;A=T$m zEa;W*W%6(#7|DStwSNqf@JcWs05o%#F^B9wqq-=z(SiAr=^pfzq><5%ED+4v&DTPe zjJ*~-V-1v#{X1OQXb)KUx29c%L>xO^TZ*!CXUy@Kk!miS!{5`NB+U9>EWtD;lI3%; zbXM=6?(y(Sj%ktgJ1@fy2Tz@|+ZhQ3{fMJ+6zW;UU89gfwtuJ8wZ*l%qVc*;qkGzD z|9T_=Lf0NH&h(_mQmN0ylBiz-%8D*S^Z;Jk;}t?MGEjSaNUoZ{gY@>P1;(C!*3*ht zf4p-l@RP1KrO7k7Sa+iiK#kjA8D^-x97pK(^7Wx$`m#FW!^=D~@9Mf?2q8bdfFoEO z2pAo4^ANyST7TFoUfKHEs;_vV{`S|_%>@JRMJcu2cvb54sBX{fnN>h!nO>;EBN52e zMgl;L6+!0JvP>gBfu>`m5|jK?13&M{2{m!*PfO;^ygB?0a6;M2p&6y^SI+i!jY$O% zMg;3{oFvTqsV53Fa^M4Wjc^T^kap}v&5^gtHpoI##D7oeaNzO`4bW5}xQs`KXDEvF zxtcO*Y5aQYs&EpTaamu`xhfel34n89>ydsi)nw()i=Z_N$4rA(y|(l}t?gW0rK5H4 zcLJiC2(EPz^fO9D&e-__KU1jz8SPFt^V|;>o0>w^r8tn3c}mEzQNHO~3OJl3B#Lf8 zf!*REB7aS*Le@2Qi>IXjwr^wZP5F#-X+vapaW|!(E2IWQmE-h9PMCs1Sr8eohV5J$ z&1W)B(zVI7g|ia*_pg!;rmC6h0d&S*wW_FSr1mf&V#&^J^ZC?U;tGy=xXSHn->|^! zN=(jdTsuGS-Cy=6=^=F*&|F%%HPlEKk@6xfAb$o;WMGj`T(eBAm(?14RS(5mX-p2J zoF^$nqF9FJ)8|WCCM4RB_`qcl+OKohcw2C2UsZA_PLla2vUH$&RG5Civ;G^^^T5G9?$U)+0R3 zO_j%XRG)pv^IN6NYnElImhwEk4w`E(`G2A=18o+h#$TsLdY~`Op`82`E=rfa7haXt z;nI(=?^Zx8AJt~YiI;bH&-CS<3_ENuGDYbC7}x2}gE&vyWm1UqT}}qFYnst_S!|B4 zX1XzLrl9p{1~FM+Qe(@_T3CY#N9fJrZ%5~uYAd{+92dU00>pCKobVnf2m!KSzkl63 zA(5FdZ_drs{0XQkuGKd_80D-4t31L0h4KVGz{Eio;H(N2W4Gbn-AYp2qcl5>SwiyW z@KbeShE&!|f8tbnEaseir$8<9{3O|`+Jqsbt3H-}Qa`ye96r;gsUlYF58dj2NAp-wlZ?*2Tb)V^I*72UcY zV=yJGoia2-)L(3wo|Pha z(=nykqdOIPv!*)auW+dgnfg7Wdd8E@Rz~~Q8lM~CEjLv|(JCBjjT#A1@~-wtx--~s zDVwMJI4W>~PP8Si6e3J|jXiHO^%tyNw&Y?`9|Ngd-Ps)BV$Zm7TF$1YTh!Ob=`*1O zc^G;#nxjsQiR&XA%zqF?sz)*cNm{Qf=vdpRiVu0yDN18x`8S9ExV4nPk}J8f-_Z({ z4fP$$ezUsu=vL?}Jaw~3ioA_y7#5H$i*z~3E7MHv&QtpFXSvg4(R~G3_ zv{NkmD~a}NN14prJL{TV`*~9s$D5$jdF-u&4qegL3L*q|=lCo}h^f%NJoh%iyHPU^ z6(+FNf>R1EFP(GJhB;rHq)*DAnwJ%;CYO|6BA9)kJbx)$iXf+oSvKozx$rK^;G+8)J^#+=J6>dfH8Z_gr!i=ifV08rwL}Tdc%XJx~vD`WP#di z7@4kd)8Nhtl!~ybK7rkd-QnZ0B_p{dPW+rIaTW3rUcO*NL3Kroe})wH+~T0Z3HSU& z#WDcE_Jt2c_UunEGlrkh^mGov^2&rf zNWGeHeQdzB_5R~g=tfngGlu;IAz4GA?N z!@-Ns5B<~j{vXIP04;1|3C+l@WA{V)Xn&O7DL}ki0}RJ@2!G;|nN$n&Zhp{lk)@v*t)+7^&;H}1C|)Z4naA6#!({pA%lu(*>wolu zF^U?cm^)7o?7HtnQ9T75^+-RaY=<*tDBd&?VT-jr^^@bBA+y#!m|+QjM9vu`11J75 zqoF#JW+VY)sk^J3w?i5eaf=$y*|yu16BKY!NHC-jl0M@4EDrjydcY602<_vAdNoOK z9)bq~sLAPbunOf4A<3xnC^l1>Re!3zj&8-4bYA#4$;8B0YMY^sG|@>6#HoT2NSIQ9 zRE;}3YY(U-=jkn~9=%n1CW&Jlo1AAMz>PjkV2G59^<~q=h28DSneA6oj92&ZU30_@$X95dkDhD(qoDR!>|q=@_|<+Eg1Xruo!{bA*# z6HP;Gg48hTK2HQnYoR@+iho<-BT}XiGKG_|DfR)q8r@Tt7mJ4M$eM#@-mMP4zx9I= z*h9*ZH!M^Ux9kyP(yx$NHC$LZE06LO(lY{5jSGfETT1=zQA$Bb&86i$v_7Jg=i4mw zFIGsSToMYGTD5|T{;lDd2w>-S{`E%O+KdmtUy!+Edf68#4D5fi+JBL%Mp4_!A|1WE z_tU$j$i&e`^hMh7`tqnQZiFzUe_($$oYeKn zO`XQfo&ZnqPDa#<@l%o@%0< zz6%L+fh{+5MOa{z3!F{|xZt5^l6{d2dS7rpRE>kBfTg=yEiYwi5S&-!@hy(^;z-t% zVzC9OBff|2+*Y({X1Y?zzfFFw(Y#2mZ=V)6WKfjjGJiM0lm$u@qqLD$(@84Mc+K@J zp93%CB4UZc0K}HTZ?pu?v$Q6f3dPK8iK!P_*V(E9iLTPRWv_o74z!_la-57@xWI>6 z?Xb>**0rR5IDbEw9m@NE7>^3~0LdgZl%&XDeWEIS)Q9~iYQX+WNG_D#SX9iXiL3X6 z&E15Jntv;~j!Yxi5Hlp$2Yr4JLiLzs8IOwq2WejS9SC0>*2~IahGgc!*)l;cbicgt*%Zv$20!Q_ zO)ZV4#?iEEl4Io9gbA=(;v-6sNyknQQ$<2{3V%#8Qmo1@L!lk?!IWiW=EUXiD-|JW zFbL7K$lQWbzF(G;Glb*{kkt~Xt<~Yx?A6%nW<6(;P9;OVXHqo}on@qf4+r|39#?|9_2my~trL7gtrXyXjQ-3mUg->uuJX9&9~oQ+~R zy?+dAiPgjV-%1L5!jPgc3R%qy3%U0ag<_jqWY?H_>9RdNQCU%alhCQEM=*jGTBfIB z{t`h1!|hTPl0E-n??r)SWnnot&*#?Xh)ol`unN!#uu~-nepBdB2oF!(%jxcJv`SLe zf+p54Zm*(CUE2QLtesj?8PMOMZ{q9;7JnRY_ld^>vKnV}i_)QlCjWmU3;yS&EI7ux zT?PI3fA?0#=!(%`*jRm$&Kd0?+_NPWm4u5gda&=a!U3p>ER}+8d%t> zS>YLB=_zk5j}}v$5r{CYBBZMPiQ4hbTO0{V*x;&mxrEU$-SW9j^cfwqw6Tjh%{Pay zgnuJ<&6lmTvmVH;|3Y#4CYDInCVzi?>}M-?FB~Y4n{)20=^z>cT79!l)=8cPp-ET* zDJ(s8t;zN}gRhv5BJWyP3u&@0^jz==939@4TJ*Cy@Md?04W!$@c1rddI0PtnUlRp2 zz#C!w@nnCK+VVB1-%9`4I6t#U;F*ye6LOO4a~{jD_n{P@-J!>Chf1B`2-_Ca~7ybT&J`!Vv*P-TYR$xdVgC2I;fVJ;uUOHX%eHc-)?7nnzm!Fu(6yd^C%-IZw|lc zujX8p*DkWIXx}P$RmW|c76!(lqiQnTLo;DJ@T@CDMk%W)2etghpL@0XEQ4;7w%&ZM;(vPiybmvf`11*t#o67ZDX-r z+KZ~Ubg)MZvnC5qfX?kA^s8nxO;!9Bw9g=xJ`;*J7om1`qbXTd+p?GjpU&{~7(G6* zxU^xoEMB}y;&5jv#;;{b9pyTWPeW&2x1y@JrmzIqRn}bY4r_0pUCXGdB?L_=Zf4fI zt;qkVZcX;m{`fvT2!D!6$SCNdK9d*0QSsvV20EZ4z&`(1h#5f$!(rUwM4L7hgN|l3 zrE7|J)w>G|Ex#CjY+J%E6mw`f1RSQv)jcntik4I5- zeu0hy)h3?c*MG^}PrE#7DO7y$^t4P!dr-#($mEcAI5c0C3#u|eS-8&5e0rVCrngx0 zV9rd}(+8V$ z^X^^{yvGvVR`QqIS4>6BXtZo{w$H+lS+y#9KqM7Pg@5jZmM1LcNDDj z6z_q{UX8k3wNHg^~dQ#Sy`0Xvn zkiyx8Lw~|(KS4q2XQgRKVaVc3>h0kVNvxVeB<@67m+%Uw%X1gyMNLpnZVKVpE|g}e z2&&VsBH3zUByO&xW?G?*YDTk5xXNT!3rllGUpi~oEXHd9MHt3Mt{PU^YOio5&+1ok zmD-Cf5woSLTLs>SqPvi>&T=&Wisb}K`5>Nb(tkyLsV9#BnYPdf@kPj-1&(_5)nS=A z()-2$L^da07`#c*1g|iZ$MI!$;5o;`qBvijW4S>x@x{h9^{gdZc=PB@k+r+5);Hbr z!PKcs<;!u^?mk3Xs;h;n`6IQHCqxR76#9PDW5v07RA!$uWaAT~wxisdesKnhi(1=$ zH-9x`Jv$_22CZ5FN1S^Gx{PR~;dsqBnGo4-7EX)?(F&v4g$R!i8L-?%ipn>!TXUq? z3s)4O9VpVcT8ZcE z#hIOw<5xi)q44YEFm#^-Jix(N>FvaZ9e*BD#PQD9BIeMuGFWfpGDNx5zwi1&QS3SM z0u)=$V#?-!p*K29#9}6MG6A=gD@c(&Yq4Ta(s?k?EjQ1hqQr!30$G|t-Y(x>$!9m$_$$u+T za>#Jxp2Nf6i%zrofaJ}GIKK_3s|}_G&yyS%vfXk-iU6h zgZ2J@VK&e`Zj5YJYJLE*N>M&7@ODuu@uHlZ;F$qN?E_2>PF;=GMnPD%zcJv^WO&a^ zW(>%tb_`}BvSy!A@G59LGZWCe=YN<=SE?_x*7W1XP>Iu2h&<5|8O{DEh?{Q$KQP?X zFlSL=+V`I%jBL!RuYb90J+ncWJ^MHVpch4^F&hxK^Fppsdw$qZDOgi_nEJ&QImDYz zNEeRX5;h2@%4e0%;o*YWT^e7>Y^ltc2#_es!pExH4^$GNq^MfVbh!% zrDy&Hp0PmfpyeT>wzclK+vX+Nvn>xWMlQ%X9ZbfrShD!9j@#tP++9Pd(BgAX%ZreD zeH67HUnYSf7u%514HQ&znJ@vT7%FHCiV91%0uKk40%z|UHM%r0j)K&{5ZJ|s%~FP$ zUO!AvR~7wlXFr2RNWl5|7=J#d%cY6D37Du42wg2Q_X+j_DO9d#?Tw_J=Xp7s29F2* zk(H*(mn|xnosI4GVHI)I@k!$4axty-bMNhVE0MvZm2kKfJ;<(dmT(24&k2SOXHd=v ztb7#PS=4BHR`n-dITnFBhkzjUD0hf4bP<&rr#`=x9ZFX&w>uXx5PxYVx-AP&&BjG; zF+$-USShXAg!bSeQIweEy9;e1$enXOBio0us^f8+$6}0x_2%$(f2~E(9)G=|Y}PHQ z)~b@FyQ|wRj=OxG;?$GU+&MMeA|X8bivl%m36n^pDMSxB@i2T4>E3_P8>6x!&`GW*Fc zBXJ^A5btD;Gp^LPS_>(lpK_R&S>4HP*DiJTvS5h;kD@&NDaaXD8TTVKiav*|9XgZP z6vt^31Sh*T770ovW`pa2)}aB@DP%p5GU7FkS6!E~)?4mIQ-5wmrwgqbagu|3zu90x zx~D;AOGRTe7z@dy*Lg7|eyHDpLK^mG&U-lk(z$`tbdi+Eytm3B-X(ZL)tV{lu7M*m z(mZh}=+XkFQ|q9*SA@UDu|4gcgOTl!Jw+RB!tU7RJcVRWWj%5V{3yD{w0zQS=M8`N2Xog+-_(%v(2o!xPIT0j2KMM*~oXQ88JdNG!`u3qNgeA+>`?0drHA}0ZP8h)X&q&vOr|&lAq9fGf?b{ zTOb6}`JqoC;)!WNaDr)aJ6z-w$g*EnUr$4PM&O3QqJLV~CYr1HNwc*?@hr@$yVti| zoph2$1wT=}x-aOvx3W{^JSNp3W=RlwJR9s{Kjl znDZaPO3Q!D+F{jV%VGku2!N(9myIi;?rT49XT)(+{`ml-mO&}WOXz8)b!BZnZ%e8& z2}z&;Reu{BBx@xyC~l*fy){2GPWSF+pLH8Ng9%Ct>=Bo`_eIe92;OJls*Q80qFxHt z$887!OL`Xgo0}^ys=sF!J=anvh6W{Xg+Eqf?0M^~)^$$n9;2X(+pze>2BNyCMP+eh zel}$Fqm=}Odr?aKPLTxy1er!z)ZU@saHOrt5PwU^K&pnqo5TN?pI=YO;MhJ*7))0& zM8iah-x*C;9y0TbMG>nF=dXW-oxwX!H3Nu3nR1*(ZY1JByL>3jcYRsdyzRz(dUgAd z;z`LlROq6{CkgR8z&7Xl_=KVXqc%CW28u55`^6dUCb4#~7l(FEGiK_Xu@3H5i-CbF zoqyYnKxGPszsZ(o3l&o4JY#O+;&{ZsYqzSA$)F;s*Qjv?UFoe3C0%o341#o|B^KzC z3(;lHBGEvT+q!DZ7)K)0mEAN~lJSHG_DGCCsi9%Dtii>?D5E<-_>izinJOz1!PfL0 zgFrdi_=omaUer{nrW~k~79Xp|4ahy!<9}$nsHG*sGRJykzKB*|!M@#zp}B8NhTBId zA5nam&@=R|oc?TwF|A#*ZQG)jAqxZ+T(nT_7gZpKw;Hg!ezpz{@cxcbb)!)<(`jps z!YhxOloId2Ul-|h=3nC-d~Mh7uwh(ccEbJ zyaCi-Rz(|^U5*S`rWneHcCgvhy3#947Ge*>q*|>v%M!pTPz)@J4yEQ@t8%CSLr~WW z%8SdI4`mf4uT7te{Q-*xRV3#vWPg`@X$m<(eR!LnRHkPwrh=J^YVkoDn|^;yjOD+~ z-bTVcoLFk(Yx!O}HS9(a9-bA!%zO(t07%(r1`_?utXfVNZwSw-X!nXvhM>KRYTYR% z>ANS?yCi}2st(omq}A^oHfz2BWd zp7vh>3T+}U2p|=O6yl@50g+dRYSH3v_Zn0|N;TA4Dd@fbpGqPolwZn+8WLcp292hy zx^+b%Cr8=PlX#RkN@+p}Uw=yDKm7+%IeWUKw?u(Kc-wTSAD#zKUC~3s_xID~MVg;> zR9Uf^j)hvYKPq)2?Lqc7pPlER!lPgrX65<-l5-6Enpr~Nro8ObAvkPg-Un|E@BbUJ z18J5DKStW0kUW=PEA9Pdf{UkiQ{+E6b_r5Urrja#i=B={zezG}CV$dOdO=7p8{aTG}lOU#D7{%BfkMHg8Skp z=wFM+3rJJ$i?c*0gB{(lW}KD^c3my9QI()R;yoBIWC(*%BQz5MtQ{?46fNIuEUvNz z7&uAsVdbcX$wI>fzJGIZXH!TD7^1?4Dsva0z-=`QGDvqhS|A|ZUY2yv!F+T05B#=h zEowps97V3Okd_M6Fcf~%sDUa&9q}R5uWFZS(0+`I?&v3>B=blQR+t?{a88r;0NyDb zSQn}j*+b3Rga!WC%2atfbiRTcFs!T+g}s8%ZAgG~#(WVO9)DAad=lQ`Nsi%mE$|_5 z<17qi3v~=3rc@a@@OAzyB{P(YoZmpwdI|dX9Yp^r{Y2D5kEO!l zS0;rc30xqbH-D72p>}W(Iy}u-%9M~#Nr)f@OGn}<)p%K&$m*WiFCBGND^Gy&HAQ)J zTk(ygXE7b^zn85iqs|+sOdiq)Ooa9 z5s$hnmI0Z<>co3l$w%NR;ty`Q?VQ%wXOUdVtpOc|+>EwB*<@QXiVPo%;h!tGxyviC8KJ${st*whG(}kfbz8%}#<@e2z~(@#9(;{WB`ZB< z1zNMssDI+*g4fIYv1c`Q>?zoK*WYN(1%ti={mAI(RVp3`{r^bh>vj zvlz@wmLDr$as1!^eLF2KVy&?!H!{j8Eo)~K2h2aSyoqgLmRenyOwXp0usyMSJ5R2^YMoaXck04s^MST%cff1x zn}6ioKHD8zX9D=`w{tOtpf@OvenzV(jEPY!fGKh2HrU)HkF+9E@?|2fu^r`G%jlf~ zMZRn0LhJAgz)+hwlTYa4jNE;bznyW`M|a6+`n(`jkG-vf-jf!m2iab@Ib@)(7LAEx zG5(Fcflz1pNHB!pbw+cm0-0Q6VlJT4i8%DxFNVg~?U9X9K`pv^cPJG7q=32GO0*_L3?Uk;H3gsFdTz=pxi9!9!D90NXcfW+&CbyWwr#c+k8rQ+=9}p zm%9UVsf&UPa)1gdU3bnqAM^#Fg@3YLcS*<)$$iByGD=aNjZNEGi67`=K<<1g73Pd3 zehJi*jAK|u4qQnx<`kh|8AWRlhew-`b!u!AwiPV0UwRs;eIj~}J|!Eb{0yoS!8_IQ zwJuISAGg6KS_OF`=~g36!$Er{)TX>#xHDeK$@=9RA-HJb)@4&iItle4(0^J}DAa8C z#2@5}ES3wH(kA-#CO1*aY_Ru|$G{Q)>=wq|AE$cikx+`Xw=}nblWBg`&+J8*wLS|l9V{=L{ST6Hsv)tXTjm}L?Er2H)t*zyOTFmK` z6F2)5;^nG86HFYf)m4oLx=WQJ3@SDgStV4iP4{?vpghna*cz&uWj>g@YTTSA6n=af z$F0*Al6wB=g%dC+1@E&`xUTMVVQVb6X{`*4at?9>!>l!u7N$Cs zr^Xt^a4K|(b*5VvMQ#yWE&U?k&xSFBMK!oVs@8R01O=^9X4K)nbANZE7tbTm1DQ1KplH24y*(+UR`vJ=~R2!A=B$8zP931~F z^DYN%%#nhcG&bg*QB?wsHDYD`SjWur`2De~ zu4mJ7gpzsIaM7bQy<6T0cFGZ|D!n2pKNIW|{AHh0Ilot&5P$n}QD*>1?4+N&Et<8V zyq=Zz5JwV9xin63Up7iF zzg_h#ObfuU6dTEn5=BwOl1uGy{NMkbCNRFHblnT)GmE z{jj1v!H|PnD&y|iK*B`?DRI%>U%65~-=j@2H6p5o8Jkz8qX59US?!Dzt=D0uHRIIu;ZO9iF{MvOv%IqKv8J%f19P5oSRxTjb$oejsXl=!eW<91(f{;qgAt*v zeSas#f7ok&66(nG`1I8=iz&2{#kfwHc-&|Der&PIfU|aDa>oc}m=e{7=Nm-J?ae#AOPW8+eLsLW-v(%_rJ*A(l` z`;zG6O+_7$cX+hJs6}lvT!lwADU{-}kg=1`cVMTQ0=46bb$j-3hqu`_tEbm84S(5^ zZ0G3c+x*gEv*-Cy?>-bA>d4?#T5PY3h#uPUo~a+FQ!VNK*n=ELpndOIR&QvIc8Ekq z&fzoY&%iH-8Ya0+qwSb(6o7Z`Qxp0>J8w`*2`@-D8HnSV*hOEOxMBHd#037VLYja_J{Uuz_Vac`ZYiv!cp&OLl z=*F5IltN*FaH{%Z3`&u7UXPKa+-l9DA%)ui0HZo1>>^>fdqci|vs&f6|VgTd8?hZ@C~X-^;=1FtqTYt3#q9_|mXhB(AjCyqFx84OjC`e89#$ zMn<2Ok7QuV6<+pQZI=D0p*HiPx*TzG#&WG66xC?21P7!k_E=F;oVpmByBuCD)u>>| zqU1(g;u&aAy`B174u9qM)yc8y4E$xwveyEmV4qVBT0OPR0EnipLiOpsuS$bc){K#2 zrft0ga3I0=?;GyM*$pMW@m!D|B*a{1#?iOit1<9myM={;o2; zObGS}KBmay%aJO)P={3qoPaVZ$4zJ&^E|HHNflcP(G0hHN0yN$-JlX*@I-wZZWjx! z`?p#{Q=v85`rEQ-A*6V>Mmh4W;@w$s6iF=usb!Xe?E}zW|B59SYqxnk~FF-=@rcm&2)Ss#I?&+PDak-!Co;wsF`_(TfG z%;tsIDTiK*z|Vp|uik!y{-V50+&`BVNz1ah@jJZ}9bR(8zSewpnEBtqKE?5{9z>LK z<9D4d3J<_0;Z9IEfW%+j>N3V4wKKsc)=b|Pn&%pL;5N=m&1DbE6}tbpEn@a53@N7j zTl-j5p=^pntIX>lL(_Kz6ycKKv{Fuh1xwNdi`Z+JmSD0?H+)#t)Uhnp+K%{hkDaH% zWeqJ^hG#VX1Sbkr@ILmI<6xY%38wTg`z^9bWR!ubjOm~a3UIW|U{@+QcVHCLv2_Z_6J&Gz%Z#gda#1u*bD z{~?O}VLjh{TcRL8`iv>5rbgBrefukEZl|fqeBZ&AcaOVu$~3`tc6Kqmi)myz0sKeX zZ*Io^-@EzCv%u|XpLM{iyl=Kxez3f(_yjoG=FHbtpt%_|kGzz^rx zN0};f+4B0)cTOIut57Hs$(t?CQ=ickhKkJGmSh>`OAN9sLZy3@aukD6^>SX=`;H0PBlapNE0fd zQ1j{^Lu~xvd}>Bp%UbgO>4DLCLk4=Q^&ma5#&8D%iVb`pq~Y2`lYeU~g}VI)Hj__v z`N^w^W5Xmbg1e)S4-Ch^w(FS%4O)@0hr!o1xa5GI#PV@xf3yMV)1h z2|h+f$kYo5&dj2wjquWQ;V`RsqcBp1myjz;m*w6Wh!}KTxdJp9BGDe%I~^tdwqut# zYGh*G-Y~zDC%cmrM0!;{)6wL5B0Bh)d$T>Y7CbIiTXKejB<%cPrjVp+Gi(?JN@Z20l(^t-NiVZp1JvK$6~eZtQZlJmM2`PT6})%s z-!*z7`Q3@x;}_v%#`eK@#K#jV`C5Bcd8LG_o`WFPp|3=|a&83B(Nch(jc0$r)<*OA zNAIFgtjvc#AFow*BZuqL-IQ-RuZ6xk908_{YRRDlkW=xf8_7OkWe7NSKLf;RG+^+F z=>Opev`Fk)p`_|Jf=6o5RhyU5G|{Mg3M_Yj4>|LnyRx>!(~%fJUnTzo(Fn6bGRnZA zN`!T-N9 z`@zcpNpil1N{C70@?+(AvSDIodLI9jTFmir67zylOM{ZPn^t2^BKLcw(bPNYdQmJ% zb`pycw7V5w25s`tA=EFQ?0W(p9|%8Q{pnV5Ircr0C@a@ zd_gKdzEL$x4vlg4A-8k2lazggOeuiLTiPKP>87tO8FK>V`VP9?;3J3Dw3=Y~){x{h zG&w%Rv_5~IA;JRtmG|140W=hxt))3;Ml+5=lf9W2eChN?WKjX0HJYC249u-PZd-}0 zW1R}Q!KSe048yz@vp{GX5gB_SGVP)l9&m=br^&k*;^}Y*AYl)asPnfK*aMu{4s=@V zc5fc3XxKf4)+r;LnDE)y+1gWtTwQQKkH&kXsIKn5p+eq$rgJ=1uH0B!PsCe9VVfw0 z_|-;N?o(5-xm~0Y2C-6j5yfP*Pc$TR#lN#yi#%DO`s^#~am%^!n5*f|P3N&Ld-BuC z-cokbz$jQ%Hkc4=$r*NL{sunqzc%O=Q|dHl1Yzl0YBTpsYFZkc2lxRf1vinabMrnm zPn-qn)uTZB2FbLc<<34E5XTmHYPflFI!ytjl-d!b7`kx1?|SZTS-)6D8o&>Kp?`DA z;t!A2aI;D80~w$YN=uJ==>`W(VNy~rwS;YF7Tg^-9=xCPo81}cd;w?dQhEBZyiQIa zG&l(>2+|~L8(K=D^vv(tFjFNl6;|w9F}xC4(L=gbQG>?eqJsjCQ^8+Ef{g{Vds&&# z8v$Uu?geOjNZh@QX{{JMA1Ax-8`GD2j^lgynyR|q@jJE=HDmcaZ~w7btg77Qf~_i0 zbKr3p=UN>GY=7_SuR-dFUv<2!`Hn}mK>Z69q{dw<4 zXBEV(w5V}%4DsL?XI>pZ za7;J5zL_5t2VAbPt`PRD`x3Zs}_K8{@_NeCx=)G3`fF^ zJw>7D_ZEO1aiI~O@Y%Mf9J;~jnVW-|DyC>#A7fEJy;#n_P!W}rNHvgbCwp{ zzm+dOl8dCQNq1?Z@AYvvPx+_H-n;|n5r@Q3R?Kef!0`GHg)VaTgq7$jRjqf(Wf+?B z1X0_`6-a{2K+duT4=Wi7Xtzh?G`VhPdWE781cG>!rEb4HoX_q_>gSrp&|&ec$PJQ> zbA*DSt&xaum&L;C@HlsOp}vzk9yE{);EJ-pLWiJ9czCSFws)^AOM}hScdvy$x}`(~ zEjx4DqG^8M2Bm&GW*LPk#gA}HgvBj~N_jB9#`#l7p4k0}nmIEjTs_Ly&SFV9Ds58L z1ZbY#mgg2%;1dzKVc zAjwa=f9I&~A#;lF&w}pbq|?Myb&3Q5Jb)>rUz6cqwRvP*W^rL-`hN4kdX>#uzt^Lr z_o!BimJeFz5*2Rf;8o|gJc#5T3*JipvyCN{z*NQR>y+ zf-l4fP-@`bP70`zWyG|FQJt~#1E>n5EDma^_@r2ls)tUr%iLwaT9XO65bR8;(wK){PEvaq?pm^cg6G_D;l?_8{W(ci#e9F3=D+R1o*0g@WsL1ix3 zh1Et#b|sK&Pox?beIi1UsCtI}s9d!pJ%>M} zgkWWXfnscG@#Jq3Bp9v908z=>RbxH*nBcNBxIMB$#P!6AxFn{?W*jZ1Fw(_d4LukjjNR!{FGE1?z(4dcSmTs2X`U~C>KN5}& zjejhIn>#(7>J~U604z2`u2}LVMzB?)hYF04hl~m(jeV!PCd%3-zR84jb-DmQ-r&4mFepCT5iNVQ|-*%X_LRTKnPvBxz;H=xmiB zFedy9%?yn`@sC!e;KWOqIQ*OTd zIgAE+RIm?AX%2)UAR7@NYPaxA;{Pl^JkFFY1X5^U^A1|C3W(e3>}~E^R;tUKBOuUq z{!Arpk&L0ccu9~ee--c!!mcfG^AFmNJ#GQ4FsY&KJsp(fI4wUAH4U}*A z%x02U;1vb_!pg*T9wYCvz*v*(cfjokyVa(Co zF-=6TNaE!K@?sD6O?{qYyl8@H7j!C!p&&y(3W~ElA_J@;wOV}Wp5FHx$Br^()!DZuJ>Ma_x zVMpo!Gs`rqz!?{LbV(BU#8P|sks_rX)GBeAw?!_`Jst9xOR2e(9EHL#NSZALzT&<` z2#xZ?ujl*Y9~H;OH0x@29LA`K$TcZfLck~AtkYiV%R8TE$dCPZhrhpth0SGv2+f9CT2{vK_dMFO7(Am>@*@g-FBfnb z34hm=tttYxbi(Kbrvll>nwbJrIb(|c0l{Jq`e)=s&jx#%Lb4 zDObz|4SftsS@!mYgvB=y7~j>_R#=9@nWXS@3zIYiIt)8+Ixl(VWf*rz*-d%Yd76!r zV<<`E6xpC{i0w4(v?T`ddC7&YOcvZU zWbfW|3s%+}FA==P&Tgi2Y8lWY0e>-}X?XFdH?T2!rb?BeHHUCnR`cNa;*+2OIJ#z3 zp{SN>{QN$X$TfAskmWvjkHM$@)~K^$w^qMofp1py)$`2t)pEh92TUG8E~fNLE;mX= zR9HmcgZ<}fvMRlOsC(&#DmEUcRe9U2f-v;6RTDc8NBq^MNk1?en{HCKMW>#hD?%PxErJn#XchJxuPm}&O!7L zq)QQl#H{c$PIv*bF!jOD0I$c^Vn5j-P7zJ8t4CY2iMg;1=omT0ab>9Mvp6y!a33ye^79%uJ^$*Zf|s!@HfmBLpk}UURr+q4}1Z z%VaK>M%AQU(M(Eq;YgGY0uwfu$`J2?KuMa}KYR?`Ho9~}#w!C*k=RVnfV*kV{f6;7 z_p){c#(=75ay=1C#;|--e+QUAxAI-in#2V02IZbboczv#zts|q-iD#oBa=F%>_4P} za+gcCh|dROwOvwf+!C@Jtev&fs!S3s-Q}$;8ihm+Cx{(wD0KvR#>pQmLRjVE@LVGCiI6lGFSpX;6OxhsVV zQw1qEziI_?zZV@Itpf6ERfQA`rVV0F!tmS9)`@xaP%XEBS$;$+hV{A7D66?DZm95d zs=u<&@2}I(?u8Urx$;h;FF`lfDsgNG(WWTkGteXi=(dgURp~{VcJF=o8Lb5pY<~Mp zg@$*(Mv|I-7kwEi+{1sU@OB@|R&O!X@0EUcZRS-JD52kO&1#k;F{B(N7{l9u=E(E% z`douA5rPFoQ4BxXvQTSHLcP~jrT->%wggeW#>n444eLu^eCX^=ulP6R$xg1Hm7`9~ zPb~{T+KCpB$&EgJBbtV2>zJwD!2aC-bFx%^*IV3XZ{JXVln+wewE4`@qC(l5%k+AJ zxiK;UQ}SC^nIx^3N*t2+RzQb&#_eronaxd<|6mNLY8Xp=9J+1bX+in%_foC=TH{6-(LxiSC8ycCtmInEk7ulre^3V6pV6_3p%=L^hgF-e zi|LuF_7p{qxhK843`-;ca53;e1qqr<0?!zrC08m z+BBg`5_bKISk=CVGCUIEeUq>8#I`oAKhxfrw=Uq-6h8w?_E#r#3nzI$HXWXoexNVU znwOz4XR4A_0=XmmfID*?wZj9i41MVaCeQFA^JgVed;lAsVVY<4Y{G=^D~mD%a5J5$ z?O9T^jPnCg==Pp_Jtf-p&^NBIb}6{aNYi=Gc+{@Nu;0l{(cs9ZnnjW z{JfZV7G(0ZEZyfjg$Hr8Djp-KSwF6iw#` zyPu086wJdEepW5p(K~ly*B>;rZyy3yqL=BHeLsrAB+q#dMl?9~1BFw{cg2M;NSS&o0-bx9we8Ck!WjNyR(!7c?-&Th@kv+vYX#)y+nLkYa!1kCUP^ZEo z7tBSa(Z%gUxYdVF@Aafa34WE@douYiL_}{4&T_BIfDoKB(kDubDvkZs0bM-io7FL139d{%)!ZK$83ZWf$Oxzf7||lP{>@UpzD}KL8XlmYX4-`#&Kp72}-ok(hPe{%inGtx6s{T5(nqC zuTN3~aW(}>a9xH{$fW+3IQaRWXHE_(*G>uqb0~vFzM*dXg&(-qu2&;4#8NMf$Z@9 zj%ieR9EU^`vSmcmwlTKECvs!@wNi^4g-UBO(>g3vw;j#?IclOTc;D%_O2Q?|PFkv5 z+{VD%S%+Kz&v-llD4mv5sot>d?9@H|^tii3?^NO3@N{*wwQ(yNSjd9DAC-4v!&4}R z0A(SC*>z7uonN#w22laa3pM!sMCZ!WAh*Pcb>AP`n@Wue=X%KSzj6ljFMKx|9eiHwsMwhv3{db z2{5Ekfr=&88Y8APT$$5=^r!;mlp+a%a^XFsL|Nb1f3#3e2O%y<>Fswu@#MdrR+o2MX76vmn{ zOqzl2nT92=#p~l38tiznj9IF|UyqsVeETAI~{zY@JK_`OO zJ(R!zFwp&_`~q)0yLJZAjc$X+N4U!X?NG@F7N_rE)2$yt3>9PpZX5D2?0mmOQ>W?r z9?(kql~$}a@8@y5+zrLlk-Q#Zu=M8h5Re+v*{PAl#`csgLqTdnWT0qv$z>k!*eA=9 zME47vs6n?cyfsc-MMC7_6;!zoC6D1fYDn82IPPoJE?F)4evR+Y|LnFhPa5C^2p_9r zC?28rV(*_{fXwD=+br(P*!-yG#(-W~ZvHwBqK|qI16Ote$}iRTTSk zt*eW?S6Xff9SgS6j?i#}b7O9f1 zUPM7n8hm5>p8LwI7tvwP70?!87P7Uhy(Xi{Qr%_!*w4I^BEa^l%3P*(WFMKxTqfQ} zMC!p?N;9H+M#vv(zLJM-W?ZH2>F}ZXRz$wu@Mo9@jYZhY-ZT4}oo)wB2?kqzg{+t2 zw(xd3!%T!NUD01Rmx9+%v!a@SiYmjazW>k6>R+xUexp+qPo*tpUbi6v1Q;Ig^ux~e z`kBgze6njnmu!z^J6G^nqebkXk8Stwb|!mDWA3;SynOe+TBuGo2KiALK;r#6CRXL3 zoystIZ$>K~9os7X-Q?uVSMc|WVXIDHQwgvc>yVvm1EwuvyAfayL%vD@>Pb)-i6%@C z$X4;gY;UdwyFG zMF(7EQ#wlF*1%oE;*1soFR>X}c_Ob6v5EtFY#C80_le0GTgzBeHooN=Q5~<1(V5b; zF1ibzIL0wn`41%I2V()ACuwlYCbKgdMe)fxb=kUelfhL2NBzu{WWAf{P)_R1c;kCy z(h^E@iDJU)sX_U2oN+tQ)zOw{3FB9o-smr6Q&~5vU0fm?wqVXcg{wJEe3$L#R%1H}r}VvP2L4v{o;Sx~qULf`3|j@JW|ET(3aWBI@rTx zbU_Eg{KDd*ds*Fn%auh`)+Oxp8G}dNEpFFxm50{InLh+TC2$nCTn^rpD|l`hR?g`h zVt{*5WlO8}5rYsOHZpkou40aHL^hj$NrGB~7|tz3Bl|7dfF7lNzte3`-PZ;~{cd^r}%;C0( zrttY|*Hjg-kyX z(&QN9afKvYxKH6~mem76NkpXB{7|UJ;=b-06?6g!SLzD2)j%j9GV_XPOgeK=>?R@ZoPRS*`+>@$)~3~KfQ3Mh8*VWen@v=Ta@*4?&^~1g&-|t z7bj3HhV34=yzmJKB2Wi!h$Hdvb`6AlZ!-q$R1^nw{itL1(xBmjBPiPQXI4lqYBK4@ zHUdqa0Q;j;On$x_T?E2Ab&zkPgpy#H&M9St+$Kft1G` zIi-h+zV_Zpm~Q-hEs_38kRXW^*C2etd=L~cQDZ5W{2}YO*J(SR(btur#4;Y5#F7BS zTbeZ1Z&irL%b1rV2ykSSyg5MRAQ0vMO%X3m4%dlup~y0^G+ivhBN;)= zYJ@Nren!G_NsLwUs;td2_)ZB7#egT3`=pDa!G$I#Cc{o78f1Q3-LYrWo(rt4OC> z{0GHp*%rqgZj>N+f415kvSI@xt2_Rs-7G5kA#-}G=C2`3QMneo5oVn^;(QR9cV?Iz z$lfY)p5tSZq?U6@ii-U-=HpQlk@&aT|0id{KkI*qL4j52zH;kYAe&JAeXn*)UStt` zb}W2%IfpdnVT0AI(2AwK83da#o8qqI10r4Ia0Hg@^>R)w1}zY6CRZMCl$>(YnQvPPwFdjSwpCyil0#H8ULKlnv$8`Lm^ht*uayoF()JY zlktZ3<#olK#Y^ab{qJqaweg1na?cWLu+_m}iNYi=lfQV;uF{EQ5xRQ&--l1%%Bya0sVCGG&qr}s~8XbK28lj>APfH;g9^KV5P zQV2zIG|ElNN*B~w5Uv>~?bcsSyeFx*K15VpDwF@HpC}}ilfGY8rWGHnVYPc`@Pg@08|ur;?U`)@b*Y8u3h+C*?r84{ zVka~~Kgj7eSjmbTSwJkQS(qeU?I44JOyc(|ZW~2>l#7-V6D2#?7n|*4b=8)O+UA(u9=UY}~V1A^ru~y)(dffH^9*Q1lhY(AY6{ zpc@=iKy^LK^BJK5yTn2y3*`j-WvW^$s9meM2th~29pQ;C8>;0MRgtHhA)boR<)oh! zTaQv!3v+;c z0i(xv+FuN zSe{{H-f1X&V;O?fhT*l`(j)2{R%!fO^Rd{aRy?FJE6H$Ok=TR6po(yH{ErU+<@EOP zlU$GVT>%!b+VkxC9O9`e_ZmpmLZ6Dq%PqQ4=%6?5#F=+IjF=(hrD!QMH&9r73<0fZRBF>50;h(MY zmVFdL*t4jY%*nSRt|nbl=R7RPjbpj4LRJNSga^q(mMf8SXK9_Hm{qFbU23X=)eCbE zpevX38BJ{&{X@w5Cn?N0eVr6Az)b<0)o#>2Kes+Rqm^R zlrA(2s8?SiB)l@#^LDSfYdC|gUB5s37P~m@D z&UdX`b7c^-xya-*6=daWm>DsU%I%mWl^4)E6$J-^*2B~vg*6|ox5EzVN$W&>PPd}w zEnK3Pk?>VYI*&R74H%744Hm6`l0k9+g%S?i649V0;te%tqHC)~Xt1(3w!fvnsgZgr zRHinX>-tjfBP$T?R!WGMDyOteUD!{T3%9N&=CK-&Ykg8>iey$=ZSafA7$b`4*813N zDT|i45_?MaIi~oLgGCPz2Ki5VGN9H#R0>f*#&$gN>ZnkT;q}bzQN^pF-bZ5r4Gu+l z9DU+06B8QLNRe0N+{cyTii$>)ZS=F%`%`-&+wd!+#vlZ9HT z=}B%L@Q9SOx|goALHp6`aaKeO`64GzbosC{si1!lLB9e{srpe~U$NAEl|?hrgIB5T z`3Z26V)H42(3LkwlM}0|*(>Y;y*5A++-ua8(1AzCV!4Q)#D^R7Cs$inszZBs!#sG7 z7JgQAN5;unA^%qSSxlLRJPFA*E0W9+%%9cZ*tn<2hJsyr6X&A=d|krPDQUX|8__gP z$;a(nVBHjId%8GqB}`;xJzIfyXuUkL8Ge>R+x{ z+pUm)VOWK&C%;tR?xpIIJq+QlG$R_=mdWHCXvPckFc(9bCk;hWRzlOq<9_UGkhWA; z-K<>aCTKU};C^C>?NfxnmiEm}pS7=;%k$#&u;4ZS1^*4Y-SfG^X>yQQ#5e7thO$i4 z4ShzylDn*HObpJGjiVUozrJXTUgyb-7*)<&lgu>Em446OLrD`=i}dPHDZ1s0IgS#Y zUKlSDGeeRI8;a*Ba&L>~lYen-9I4M+B zP`k%s`TDm;HH7(jb-Yy#Gw8MjSD@(Njmg<{r8*9u5q+t*y0WB9;14C@C`5 zOt<%%#Q#Ba;=~6tFK@!H8c5-W>AfcBkVml^%a>U0PY)WUDrZf0Wah390Vv$(#a4;y z@sh~v?I8qovfV`$SaA@Y;Y6eQhU+M$jh9ESfTX9y6|I;%jz=H&Hkn# zde&UD$6gF8643{KYFi}-H%IR%6v`2$@5fJ4*qG(^dr-Q;W#oaNKsscu6=(m=hX2@@ zFnhJj6;3@YR$l64?b(I9wmD8!Z%yz2ZZZ5_Lbgx*uA{K2Nz z4G5t$iF?T_KP=;Ag!U-CfD3G<(W_n z#)=%B$@KtWbAJli<|nIJ)f{AL)*uI3q;6vvK%sDEP=}*Yvt-sO=fw+=IgkqwZn_%A zs7z|EZbiVu`T=K0cg3slF^|_NF7BY_nHafaf#)3?r5Pp%n0IgUf%%&#=63L& zxBt8P0De}Xx~qfvx$@m!40VfWItC5VcqIHJA`iyB#>|!)9NTa-Gg^{mOn$oE%a@{F zAo0*q_#A@BO`mBSklvTTAD7|?ffA6CA8%zN=xT7TprkV}8%w?IThNHsHSjfUKEj5vgmLe#m(4brrn7 z_5tt3%j;9eU7v4szHev`fnBm^u-hJuEEpVINV0V?K5 z_|6^DZ{~1|SQflqa(w6Mnr^F~RPd&b&*e50UMRhlt8z+mS1;YILqvc;xXkwkHbC!} zk9R6?-yI@1cfD22_}G1lZlFy_lMYWJb!U5OHPP#x4os+Yh+(H_kgOXuS` z02DkzAb)JV;mJ#Vhq59qS9#wA1v%&V4k9lF3WfrL0s;jE1#&EtqWzTtkf;p`0SwFM^cz1X2ZK*sq&KoI}K9YvV`ZNkaf!`j5@ ze}erSxS|5ST+{mo0)q5kFyzYN+qP}<%=>*+r_OtRti5*af2*(VySsY# zl9vJnLjwW=f&yw$_0~4Fv#oOm1_EM&00Kh&_f<>C&eqw))>%*4-QL7Whu+P`x+!VG zHjoiXn4*mj$WimB>>(q2~rm5d%56Sb{^`?Ks<$ZS-@EdEQk-YwW=n9=^J76m z6=>oMkwjyKe9Bu&`LJD@y(8X=-bx&}E(%XHA+g_JZnI^x%IB-|TNewscnRaD_4r3P z+*v{9MS!lHJOGgpEZtU{YPSTQwyg!vd(4`5E>C|0*^_gHVnSw{Gy_SNj)a^~g+ePL z*?RomFy;RX(vjn{@aaD|vmih~u>W>FM-yu&2KxUztLFP8L79*sc0F?p(>z_9RfLTj zxP)ifbO+hTr+-M z`q|EF*i;2HHqn#4U&6FA34g^i8xMVB`Ft@m=^_yc zIcwg)|7{Td4u2o*e_pHd&mc(u3}S3&B=2Zv@5EqWZ~q^c%~BAw?Po;ld_h-Oq;W8e z-z78(DlNy?^j}Bw5E@>KRSvURqYv0w0Z%&C&HH!z0nGXha5 zFO3h-dNB})k-}9T)bD4-Gs4d34{&u9SQW5htpvb#1~xX-I>^c)*XR3ZZ;UR?votaD zxpuQb7M{1G-{uagAx*eomTk9BFt8h)SKhjNmbb ze~&A2Z710v(vCSYKQF@P!d7*t+MoCa^R;+_R!G71y9X7J_P;P_S8nqIB8D#RspJCv zO;7ahq5FxL>BG54G!&2p$z8Aqz|7K0pN$kQBO(`n4Hk++iwrd8oKCqA_*7FqpAf$e zou(7?GDot6SCef~D`_O}vSy>9>F~5$x9;`7X<0MNieKwM%=&FNSGzB0yHUg!6%q>V z`91c95WuZO$;B*4eZt>P+4x@K{5Od}rh_2seZ@o&}XN*!i%1j;(=yiA*)pw+_W#d=zd)U!#w9ASggzi$XPvlHo_Ph%@q1I+2H_D^zB4@v4X~0RKoWb}-8CO0T z7bmO@!ZhzTQ;;_iCvD~QnqM!UmUOR4&Xk|bUEI*)VA?alck2f3Z|j`KNHz*4rhY5N zcsm}#A!6?ldcx5%pIh_t_kCH4w0z5W_^%E}DLq(9Tg2%D5O#nvLEVp7`Wxx}fIEH& z6ZAo7W)v&-V-nk?@XHIcq=X&-q`iCU`2e*QFC-lWQ_Fw`YnSQsfuzCiztQY11No)= zLvr_T{YTpWZ;%+dI62$d{7;-r*TM8Nq6P15l|Zd+C_~20H%4&sD8IyRHv>D_jmkuL zdy)iPNBLIl;|7V)yEIYJ%XU^0IX<}fQOC& zN6->lah0H17OhV2!l!T<(UXYSDP}t;vPMt$r(Ny?CvYn-DXayfz7czIz1^L&eMuo0 z@7%m@+Yx!%6!@5J{D1041q-JCAN9ip{kQ(@u6B;b4F4;E|BmEh^DkTd=Pds#hw&4Z z1OLfYZ!k|7Eo?TpLhkROc~ zACNH333>SSd_lI+5x8Y=D5wifzl=M05RX*ls(i5(sumi-26@+bN*o(Xz^5~`mL}w; zi{jr3U=9>;XO3VQC{N_*>3j$OZ_1 zMG_hrO%}tK@5tT~H%-s{h%sJ3;=-ILNYbXn%p}bHU$0yrZO@uNM+5{_71kH))z;@Z zKLc4>Ek8s~E_0I;9&Zo6Snoq~kUzIEFF!3m_g`J^N^n+cFKM5GTU!+!JOaK}OD`Fo zc0F6@G%eE|T2sSI_viT*EA9*e%@Zvv?jKjRT-51LB8Q)fb2D%jg1v{2i4$!%Cw)qx@>g6KCARPa9cc2sxECh)e)_{)ii8qezG_2hGvexQ{FM{ zD105Yrzf@q&e+|F2pD?!0gg(JQLa02E8RUQ3?3`vC7Vw-v{qh^)HNyUUoEf2)iWFX zKC1)$zPx(1JI#7c05U+}h|B|B^0!r|#CLw?#>mo}CjG8!&qtKjs?E>!zn5aFZSS8i z*PV~8tc{!QhwUsx{?A+Q5B(pmocr-hrAL}8&$pa8N1v@0nXX3y{U7()HM)0Ky8Cjc z@9v`|mL4A-FE8JpKI)xB?~D45wH=>N?`H?CO4%G%DYYE_Yi)K{o#kwPjby90kxdg3 zr$#!b>!t;Y*Gydj8O+oBu3OkOx}8=r9|OJZhs~M&A-uWk52qd4lkSv-@0->nj%NxS zjWC(+NITwDj~LaDtdmC88EeRCjf8`etd9kPhJKU#FQ?4=N?U!=28k_h;&_3oqmdB4%hVbU!8AXvtJEO{z9B`3=@NCsb|C zC#p|Q#+Y>50N(F~08n2i8qeMSzo7-I>@Kd#972%3Rx`HbK9$Lcr;x47VO9Ai0&CjI zG}{I4i!vlXM^SV~$@U{kp3AnUFfC_w=beLj^q56fEN&~~Or)pv=p?Dl8rl5SaU<}K zdjri>8@~d;99X5^=9*k|F=c(pauypWI_Y`RJ1VVU9N@it-Z7ab)yEoaH2EjKD1y{N z6JOj!yL-uRGV)wCVk%pcSbB#Zkq4}P1n-MEcu|S>)n-}S!f+Ivc92{p+wTp zA01-oy46RWZr&n|bt)?Hk^>W7N0zs$I83a>1_%_^g1|wfF~ZDskEEpDjzJ8zZ%Yr6 z9|1S2&l>)e_zWwrfVV@F47)ayxWyd)HD#`!#2re3ah5@chY@^^{*?WJti5R)bWyvp zCPRH+>}EM1S|*EXa*>@3Ge^jW_&t0dx)co)yzO?{wkplPJ@#|}mxvcNM}DMH1jnCf z>taa zXp3jUm$V3u+aLOMN0O7JpUn~@N$1=UNybp}75jv~Bll`19YF7dBf#pV z2e!V3+F|NC4%hnnDXrR~Rs66=C=2nMnL}vJ1)$Ow){<6naP@jIl9!e9jSfw08%5A! zD@$rNv@LsmuKLW>lTduo6G0cZpkhMtE3!5odk4b9#3igC)Ld)A(j;A`e`}D@bh<$Y1 zH9-(r{Rz8@2IG4oVGotnCCt+lw&&69@B4}c3Kf*zVRed+jhLT61kXTA;f#S3M*VT0 z_m{|zP?y@wnV*uL@|R)Vc#eZP5(NAq;dJQb^V=hhmi@;!GLiUz-HA>q?JR5TyWG+W zSD~<}6QB2iE-JpIw}~06f}6?OsT_(ye&KlKl#5Q7X=&W8!KU&(^J{AN-Bmp7uCee{ zmEec(;XZyFwWxrOV*1wXNU_k8~ z6DC&m1VgeG%M_~S+OkFXUXD<2?k}m)p0^c-EiZBX4UTv{YgPWc%`hpwVz#zc1NT<3 ziFPtW5-_+5Tw8I)$`FPA;U<*619a=&qCsw)h%0%J6J+-w$f~loPOW%?4`8C$1a$)i z`a7Os%xJSoI(b%GWNbeBuFLp2*_4TKWTQzkl0Lb36^D!}lZ7g5w>i~*)I)QwaW+Q_ z6c}{Mg@S^;g|_w-owmA|&bzRS@Zxc^wUc_m2@-evw^UYc=becpcBhH6nx3IIu=ZdGsB37AnX0u07Tv#01oD12cb<3Im%y^DbuOOcwTo zyj z8Ci6#gg1%}`iPx&WaFE3A4IJ1_=p6=)nGF!IO%T7m7=2pyJ@>|ZstcWb!Zb_bYcNZ z=o0paN(u;xDT+!2)L4dNxC`mv@*VWnTB&n=E`Yz8X@71KZ7%*XRbshYz#oxA9T|u3arL#R_A`V6DCfbBV z^7Tub%GB%0{sgg6zbkgRtu5nOi;Z*`slgI;2tyj8vzHdC$Y?BtVt@h?=~OfZY^AQx zXwZ~G@P#O%bB5aU4?!YCuG$Uw(%ycLk=s4Ew`t$tQwOi0y=k{B1uZAUINu=4R|(oy zUWQ++wzpgV`1~nYDcM#qM|MX@M4uGYJy{C7)*423B1O}LPNqE>bfnUAOa5x2WXr`& znX^@8>J{RKh;3P2jgCt@;vB1BOYaq8|KJs?L2A=pzh8N7_hAYc7mRePTJx)z z6qU089Gi4kW=w~lNl2{dgSL~4@h=J9Ib(bN!xE-1a)BFEQ&xtkvoUS`ya?6HPkO>g zHG1_>kfOemo(1hqE|aqZ>I|}x#|etm$=$ZH;Q36W>Ljdb%HUZB|UkC zB7YZIBwNcDUoNW$J54HV#BbJLLiUUDJ{p!B#|)vjc=_SKQCbb2IbHgvRM+oYZr~!C zKLVg1x390Wgf=8K~Cr&7GPwFi(rOxll7_(_X;@AR%u2dlR1_&vD&Sc z8tW1%nbfuJBS;-=-1J18NUs+>kRFJ%Qta7Um<_{WFQjrQ{7ouRowcjpxX6b#vSLlN z;k@r0-kugTD;C}zdTiULVBl%! z2ocwJdC%0Wnk7!E7#eFEhD3uHgeQvk{|Y}1uqArg zQTAdM`7$`Ta9Mq&()&*(iR%(2aI?*4J`~2%++OaV%;F^VXy=Id$`H zu3J%Aj(>nnstuQUZgLHsco;aaE5W`9sk1G8(AU z!X@_(B8YK-{Wg3!Y+|=tTWwtFvRlMdE6r1*Bvl8iL!xjY4M_>{r<3~ht^soS3jU4~ zm2X^zQkfp&72}+p?CGZ73pen+jT z7g6swEahFtkF)HcOOje*TscHYUZpK)KIz$s3`{dL* z39NI=I5iL1ur(mP+T815)h52m{P&)K27jx?lQ3gFXtP0uL-%C^CtbiIE^)v<-6eG4TdjEKQAOcnq?f-vZFG^AX6UTT)hqk*irxG>Ov4gkG4VI^3LZJP0p90RAP@o5RI=cj3@3yFTf!@f|2- zgXr1PA)8&4M~^keE8y)a?-7P66DNUBF#A|yI(P5yn3AhP^4LzOok!H*_Zx1zHOFJw z<^j*5k!sj&gCPcb$WcoYbv?p}Y^-Tw$kr~(+0Msl(}Woc+Ku~t>T9-+WiW^(ad}?} zRy)k^O+20h`3@^JXL=XyewvrgMTfs+K^+gQe_9cJRUY zKA{p$bSC3U53w3J;801iRtgQ9M$@@Ib0IN|96e;)czb0*u~H>`gN*J-W4M*}sia)p zEmx3at7Xtw9%P;3A;$}C&_eZvECtb*SdKR9wOJgXmeEB?E#pJi3CIFxI{P6DsGNVh z`VYCVC)wEbS(df#$_EB_`a(;)ljY=%UE>u>n1{88V>YBepCo zVe37JD-SzQMRw#tb7vFdxxY0AO0j7MA7Sfd9*iyJUI1Hghp0e{)*qF7P;xtDUn!O# zwjZe^cQ-mVLmlWnp>(OTW{w25nl$?A+;98f;VFsGQ{m>W|GB@qIIf+>AswdLwhlpg zLRMxkmgQd1Uxk#oH}3e(;%@e{OR3|$c$AP z)``4_^Asj||5?V}x8>5vimV|5mEC&k4{jmMS0oT*L zbq9Vu`{l8%vRV`u@9%J>%TLUj?-B>aXT9h}c*_~FV<$(FTSw(!<6;NhXYc{Z1mIGS;a6{{s!a?mu;UCbIJ=W z^R^Hf5(q1y=N6%xhGkL;huYlvt#bcYwI+Ew#UI z=bt(HwOj>Ek4Pude71891me+gM})p>dJG-k=k@DbaG=t&Z&UT-Ve4o^%5=?5-M$jn z+^p?mE3mI&e;j6`pTZ+cZNfB7Rv4iLTdq;laKGq5z1q&fsXXrhm+w;TjkeaLuRjMW zay5l7$&TD?5y5+jf=TKw*$oPCNAN2nUxu#;DYohKm+ABg&QNzO<=`A7mLomTy;Dh*J=^e9)R+=yo1>+zfF!^>M@mq4vl%9yymwT+f#9SR!no^Kj^^|$VO z)sY)GG`~#Xd)TV7de#B!Mu#3hPWcB&hKUiv%LR%--g5hO#KMo(qoV_HW{?n*Z;e@2 z_V8CZxGw?JdML4^L-fs^nn(dR%p6t;lc?L%kXt1#VUBq(^7l$8F?G6jr|dTLV4k&i z4Im8>v4qIqM40aj1pMio@}in7YXy}11*>#oA#U|5Zz0#4pYwAZ&g%y?W!U?u-78A%4HN$Six)2Bccftf&-+Sh|nxVT+$n3vs zg|J8lkuSFYECss8>p~!>{-q8&Fe&X>sp;wvqQ>kEL;=^_k<}2Y;isz_C@q_3%URw?(@4TD5D*Ml+5Q|&SG^XV^%^Ph}@FHk%%Cv zM9V}3VObAyl=JL$v`NGQ8;55T>_F6yPb^Bfk9Er#OOR*=CJ4v9(ab@a~3eQgSmNot+X3*v*m-)n%DDUwvD(aaasBG zFR7+Em8D)Lp>tHT7x_3sBhI_|J!^92S%~}b@3>HsROV8B+a&+!%naxg2WRj#2G}oC{4xAIO7g+A8(v@*@U0hnY z@uY^1U~{pw*h~S`mn#w;6~^l($>WiWQ}h|)&<7&w`Xc78Yh49@bF0LIjQX4`t}C@@ zYItUr?2Kc0&Bs3FWLKj_@K5utJd_Jg_}(;p2U_Fju*f50dy#zqY?9i6c_Ut#XGpK2 zbw1hA@FmHG!f-{2dAyP|?7oQjT>lj1PN~;l8ejRPEt#a1Fu&htAw%3GGfl6w;> zr~TtaqhWOF+9@$`PfYps*bcr_rIt5Z>2l`8Mo6OZhihA&bp_70F4q7rCe@Q`ekGUd z+L7A;@LyRGI+|KYwzx&sG>(M#0Z`BhiaQptk$V%WAHB^1?MDRmP%E_G)`DI43wmaU z!Q7zPHh8eBg>;0f<+0)|OtjTEs1+y;KfRk14oLdwBFa(Y-P#%KF(9;rk5m#^qhcxtQLhnDT0uRL$%`{Z%D_ge%EhaaRDg_}n0w zT>;OMQ_q*c95R!gmz(YAkIPK$E0_+5=3=ghW9%`mDf(W)fFhG$7p9rP^u%7hpnyNa zeOrQuCP%}{l;0`!c&#JOj;$7fpKjw%?AYd2pHyHzPUk zZB6EiTQ%}L8%%p~EIXw*D-*m|ut)5LPB0YyxRG7@ft z+KQ+klr$pWeChD|GR!aIf|JwR1Sa#-rBGDBNxb)>KaWs@ylJ5Xi(z>~hbV?Ly3Gp} z^?~~j^BU+35@-sg`gREQaqcqlzx?o|zj=@8U`|;%TI!zc_VHt&KExIXK{9=2aFN)aVd(bR zD~|B0hmV}uvi>w9#@r)$VnE{nhX`2U=!1O z*uFx_gAk$(X)L3(>oc!&F`u4FEK!P+?o#_>B8_xPsWrwt5ygW8!l{_PJrN_*7Y zo@HZ)J}wYcmkrmHEFI{$!fb7GGJ8yv7ey}~anA>>$2;e7&1^SG?_g5WcHHYCqPxas zolsT#uR~>Y9gttF9w}@QbgBw-M0mcH+z4m(?*T;9W2HePdkPZT`f}w{%Y)yMNgRpx z@(E)pyh+|HypNzU*eG|q@AEV3SlVsBp=`)Es+(DKU#{9ouFXv_@6)1Tspg{-pUf9hBz~Z>~Ld9@vvk-Hpp5EZ_R%%;C z-*z9WaHD6(eL&y&FW}E&B^4>DcR@Sk#-I;KgTs*gN7ee+Swm;lY^t*MJ>a3#qv1lB zz^RUjfFrf)2cFLulLRaK@*lVfiu+1JVNK5byelW{X-vLmMQKr82G0POYZxOLcpsNM z%W8e;&XgX;fSJ0mVOUg---RvFJiWhJNL2mO;@)*A`SP7@Y?RK?&Remz)5uJ1cJjW2P%Pz-VT4vJgKrVbu7x5;I-)!v&-xl3YD(s>0I2;%Num? zQGRW^I-9jr`ekRFtM-=n>K9QhgzDh%zO`AUty4-uVOGl~&+AcED3d)!z~XE?6ZsWz zFy)fdXh^Gyt_YZU>mQQ%`IKf8C5K^ZwJ}6(eo_Ljv;cC2hs(kdYu}yUY_pxH z6=Dl6yVX-o>%j$rFa&Si)Y$$gf_R~KM)k}!1eB6r{REf0j;3|jN}1rXF~VOceVlFQ zcSO>*F@Lbp)j5YGqyXR8r}Nsp3C7;P1c)kFNy{b?nfjN`jAGYGCr4glnXriT>LXui zBITbC7wWqAb<2xaY#P^p&8WXIxo`QYm&WJco)Eq#8&Cks*6g4P^ z0$Yr+!^S!qiAQ1VTiV1|tSy)P?nmUWNX{K<*gstLk56&&C$51JjxFVtbyk_9-;0X>1(QW0p=V(b}@~fOiZYS<*;a$~zKK`9^8#pO5=+KV{Ek zgCi_I)cvV`J{-cHfkd2~w}>q(ZaQ9OOQ6%mKf-a$DYocc{KN^q3?a zEQ<6bEk~ClEJG!DsKuuinX`{ayk3-NO`&jjsn{|GYk~MuJBCny{~TS2wOm^@2h{<9 zLS=W}llWAJ^uC=XWT?Jtbu=1s(ld=Ov^u=}r*Gy1aAHOrKjm7Usf#;|rwKhHK2TQq z4eN!Or;~urRWFMaP={eGe^7#qbiI?8xHafG$>}AdFQlbNbp`|uHg~Dl9xdC7BWa>! z^VpNCOc|9~iVcEbu-}mWqQb91ctM}PtItP*OB8)!Tcr-a&HGkC6JPUnS^q8BKMCj> zU0FTri1fO;ZiuaU^X&1!aNcI9c|5h4q^C*0Vi5Xx{l(Ha@Ia%ZZAJjU4-oj;qk?T1 zk?QJ4?LvIx&6pF`fo$T#dE^1w+4@FUe$wcB;0O@4FW1WG^(K9UWiVb8yz9wZ6{F-^ z+6Ijgje<)Yfbv;OE`~amDB-JH51ljfc~^`2Qn3{?2{cK-SF`pD-g>=8PDE5kbhD6fhPJdM}Tr%k?SjHx5SCu z01or2e}-Y#aURs!;mM@L&8fe@aYicBFtGkeIdhXX0NKT2vgvafgkROQphJNlr?i#L zy!xwI1UBayFhKx#{p? zJS$sps?4ko#rnU_ErlQxd!|By7Lg#7bDP}i<6AIj<@$e+31iu>aC2HDlk>Fmcyef^ zsGy4|j7rLCIXIsH03Xjb4f{XNk3dx=^@t%nYVp@D-?KAZH?uBUIa&qACC(J)MRSx@ z>B~y1LrhbiX>S*rJMa&t1(k-MXfosc!r)9SB(u%W#1+3QkFeZy^U!voH6RmDHp%`C zVz01Ci|e=RvEashH}So_n89EcLm@+~EUU5`{E{PXV^`~ksA;A*0R8>S05g^fV}92Q zPLv-3eqt7fitZTpdu7bxyYh;8*>9z_`&g;ziJ~xRN!s4hpkHDlymcZT8kw+tzaas*7 z^8p(s05VdemqGm|eix1$^aBjn~Sd7hBzKjeoao%|&uebSVo!-fZzdVrg$USVk)O!aamWmm=mfxFe_K zU4ZhrL0$WrGnU9JXWGj188Hbh3TB#2JU_;y4``Ftv8~@_-9)=^)u{@fSeFaVrLcQL ztZ-hLs_j(i*{UT&ut8~h2`d>)F8*a;mH+TzXBb!DtfL|zqZ}0Jnmi?KQtP<;78Y4q zKcn5K2LOME6aJ~AcstYMG+tp*CdaoKjjto~@bja~zDIHcs?IdQask_%lq#v`Gr|s} zy75A|5nAx9?Q-;eW)0Z+!eP4=xkyEN{n<3xeDU;-MHT3(_DiuwMOW8%CFj1hy&v8{ zNb1!F-Vm%J8QPWk3lZMXW%{feuAJ5_UIxge*O2{O2Ytz|JEY| z1v@->Ud3TrudOh?G&**cc|jEB`1setKh1_w#eoNTvm;`?kJ5o_y&k4;#&0OZKuP1Qv4eH&w5g(BOsHg5 z(br|mYE_BcBHmb(6dvCg-qdvQQ(NNoc%3Awr^GE|B`%^mGSqhW_q-9|Mcs%|)56o5 z{5yF8u!5$_2~6&G6Ax zCMi^fd#6SThbp3}V=3rO?F?=TE7A$MA!BXUae;s~vhpi*wU9P} zho~F4P-%_~djf4zl57N}A^PkJ?^`4dsPVJNxJpz}8ERIn9-K(mjf5o&Imh)$O~_nD z=V4k$X{S#kN-j_GI+BxTWoSt=LUx~K$!NnBIH#g65e1hY^aa0Kd3%w<`zUltblyJf zc(nk76Vd8n^4Z=vL8D`d31GUX@`T^Ux8@LL>uf6LlHMGlDgpr?J=jmE2#j>iW}C}o zEV@~=iT&x*jS{i$xKlbq@4o%g#;R&U2%u9&pfuZ(JcpI7IL}3}Ug8$?=%<$f(^Om7 zxh$t~%t@SzvB^xKaENR_@t1p#Vd}CM>J}e0+9xW>1Sf2r*(@e=)!K+j6q^ZjTIHM& zvp^oZl=0Xau=7_89cHOiRFBwuiJuX!pZ{t)M?@XwBTWM9h~I6s%KK1`CnnrEu%`8E z^a<@HD)Pp{&ePq2^R*AKnq}GD&34Np%Z=xEo~3=r-U@^6CvKF}<(!__5=Z3cq(Ib7 zAqkX8f}Jjl+pMmA9aY*GLXS8^e63@a`cTp=VdC82dYj@PhZ(A(u!d{c@mt~peQIQn z@50O`o{WwZuKZpvIs%1~K&cbm=DqwQpKUDRbyPO*D}h*%fb!k--Pl!6t-8s>lJ>A` zpEjGY4u3xhL)}dhMT1l@k&!C!!3FJY{Q`x1%xc}-_Oz^ThcO5~j1_yqhx<773j|xq zX$IXZxgWIhzMY+l482DBpXU{dj3nOd7KXOhg9QO}8dU*C*ebEr?8@fT3Ih~c+4tM) z&17`odW(bgah&BU=syv5S~VGYdNPmpm_^B%ECM5lcJlVu9%T~XM-)<~dG)JN&+;d@ z4bQA@Ba8}331nS&GFrPXGBaHf&Y=%r?=y zn_Z7F9MXhCQX!4103)>WpOLj31fr^$7IIV@pfoT{Rr~Jw)rx`c{oNDG{Qsz(# zw(!A2@+2tqNjMW`x%w%0qtVJ^go#e|IDZ+Q<#ZOi$`YN#tDG`8vKxVFl3)y_CC2c>GFIT$Vi_mLl?HF@A;G) zw=Aycj1>dHK#EHHbG0(;+o;jGtxQ=O8$yiu=-RC?R&p2awjdYx&|=0#Z@Y}#0c{srB_ z-R;L=faZX+JJzNNoF#^Ln2KPYLPjO$d&dy==jrF8r@gxj@wbPw@38_eP9lepfgEw; zcKDR5z${Agr$Bx)j-Fk{f$6mr@6GmPKYm^NgAhk9Evghp<$|m659e1*c8ULwpF35V zG{n(s^Mi<5)iENqh>|Ec>B&W7WwX&?vrR}*l1h{CP0%+@}rrShGEDui+Z`Tu_aH0 zZDy{bl{P~pX!Y>y-~gc6a9dL%ckbULaIR%KWDlf&?fv7$)@Y`|{+Hfmst(;a{sKs; z^e?E)xXvx>Pn+g(eM65e#{OwNszmfhYHFkexTD?&Bd(Kp?k~)bTHfuL=>gz~7M_?1 z3k{PwT@DIaGqDLVG_cV5ttu6LuJoZ{8yqHYqK%#;Zxpj-F(3$0F^NBssnnufVd>k^J&*N+(e=XQ(+ z4r<0hjC^X`F$xw%VWXORfFPSj6L_yzrfq8zpvB`LNgAsGLdBN~3UOlb>} z-6%|qeMca4zneR1-@cFA2YI%)t-9gtP*bK^`F^EkJ-o5iDVWdAlIndQ zH+-=l`Uy`0(QB|J8XKD&^Ng?1FaQS6sTG$J)~#;+8!DeR9nCBU{fPE+xs{EgTt0fg zGZv2Q`4|Xd3;U-oJU5;!0^`!Vo9=)nta{mFNV~cOe*#yx zPo0Q^!%`$l)Y8}E-}J4-xoVQ}uP}Js5OkaF#X1r%tivMSc~iH+aQ<_dnENIYj@HzO z(llG%nB4S-_>Md;n&YU)+Xc;*+-`t-l=aMk5!S^VbcAet(dNRwr0Cqy74L;fS9-g~ z4X_CNzlo8u@n`7|(bq_-oD5m{kqC?h0dE zRSK}#lCcbGG&=&HCzvIyh23SX|X!mI3l#l+{>=>hxZ8YmSlfR^q^vkhEp!(da4bKzPsfp>v z5VvZos4UBrSucWxj;GzvmP*Je4g_qdyBAbG02c*yW#rCYL9@Yy`O5xyxDz}Cg!~qv zip8kiO0!lB61Snbi&+Mhoy8KM9{|FZ0__f)m90i$I#h`*YQFw=%YxwkCl9G4uvM@Zbx5b^ zaDoFz6@hWugf@0Yq^`4HyK9xHc4uHt~uB+Npo9*qZa94rUg4 z^EIkUuU>`b+WI3WhxKBga3Nn|>hsW8<;r>WyG1_qa7X&K32VlMr5G4QbzX zQvlZhNKV8+7}B_&5;!w{wec|2;jN$E$hPA*Ug)gjR7EJlL-NBI(l*)ZBg!yl$bqW5 zlTXHpwvj*xe&TK1k0T4%Eyq6zw^=@^Z42BEKqY0Hh%do#v9lX11GvM+yQoq)e}m2a z&EJyPI*9@K6U7xS?0v#r3Im*S65i+KHAk@xeGs7D7)!NLnMd80!Kyfiwb&Ok;6@D% z?$jNn~%t?2y|>jG4X>{s;4QiyYlCs_K} zucP`(FT5ie`vdo@aCf7{qI!eq=dTP%ypN1CYtanv4t zg%mfGw~V}I-&L0l5nDuJ^Rwz_Mr1h^f5V*iizdj*rj$kV*4#SU+B;+y%(3nq;(1XgMXH;#iY1 zh3lYAuG=V5&hCkxbDIZQh&yk$$Fvh`!<^OQv*OPqEch#bq>k!wA}6EXg-N5VGgRCw zN1(mzlH^238<|)dKra?ENAq;E`H3q16ZB<`DDAc?TUB}`T1gMP$&Txm8eZHq+|Tb! z(`uv!xQFqrC8q4Zn%x|Hgj#=Ety2+>M5Jq8RWnjY?l zK~EYC1pnT3-cPnN$t;L}y@VFh<(WPpAvchw^MjdaWcwMH4vOopelxF1nM9)V7~Q~h z)wMao2V=dA0uwi=+W8@kEoHTsW)2M>YZ^5(4mjC;{AP|xQ7j@Ss5tE#3Niz#AGIYp zERG;wrL7krT$f1rOFL7=#(xpo#R_@o6j&8y=n;9+O=(og8dgo zL?Z)UIkgA+27lFY(-($me8~LF9tKtKKG7KfVJr^8qCCxva$$}iM@cSbg9Xi;^sGe_ zyV08S$8>b{P|bigov1(7JC5OG)sn3XKD!xh zFCm2JS3P3;SZwl7RN6|4}~`RwmH)tvHJi95OxP?qiA#CWyo z*($2rxCZG|s)2g5ESI{D2RTP{y@PdWW*xox>I`)Mu4EQOVj#eG^Bk27 zb0>+?k@^#+^xbgto41wH#?y~Um@bzhGXJjH8oyCK%jjlimFEad1KK7ou#CPC!?uvL z_Tc{jO+d20h){-a7K>Jyrp4tyBv@FFBPY{yxnRXC`VvVy9=tTM7^CIaFdIQNdAkNx zF#&8+KFD@nv=wIjD53&8)U-NA<03t0giuq=KsyAKVpo0u3$qkB!uTsGoq1=XJXvfP zD|MyZ2Av{NzbCaJVijm$k6#U+ZW@z@G(7Sd4jZqyL7zCjR!`_dRm9#-Wm;FRqm8^=?gz6_w-M+s?-UWL4!VNdASme@~R zCW%=$tI!=o=JB1$r)L8{fY~j_0^K9$>vkK4NAspS{Uf6nudHKqQkr`svz8F9&5Sp6 zr@|Jku%>JYGoporsW8!@Pw^%6`DIYY&T)8Vag;UIC77E@dXTwCK}g7l(C~!0d~)fJ z5GaT==9ZNSy~vr;gVd@sCb4I3(@a>3V@zdPJ{a>y{5=>ZT-zCfC5$*4$Etj({Xi6Y zSX#BSYT!elwNpURT!8_UT*xv~S;N+XJiqm}hVL;LJCApqgqAZJ*phsps$Uy2ooKx( z-=>+RDr|Q6m{l+r(9FzIfxsl?{1`meLZ>^Tq=nUyEXN3HPk|Gxk^FCIQFqF2#UQ#J zw6ZdWA%LtmQ!;GMZPr~B{R*VmwgNfu~33|XKm}9aF^rYSImM!ulZrFg|ZDIjT&}QmP185v@aA_TJu88=q=iYu&#~T8k`b5K3PhG*I(%h zpH6{s`8C!q$(Y~(16*X(U@uhDpq$Yu768wKybk zP-ws_i{Fsug>?{FaDL__7WljtxCA3ZZ_0>RwH5|T&a2L!uvMG9SAMnLVQjDH;;ALo zYyQPZN38*p5-5Wu);1|VZ5ZQgEyav5Ki{YG-XxtT*R>gfPsPDb)WibEZ}g^;P9*bzz?Y@!OW0{sd2i z{^yaQJN((er&&AFHWUxjJ;O+lq=Pk~YSRq8jran#4(g&03&0rN3=C{YEkduWKsRpAQBw2|=Dhqs$iU+_f4aa>SQrpL{833!)#xfxLL+ zzR&pWiW5F4fYNs`!np(`r3(~oc(3H^Nn|6=v@>3BtNV?57C9Em88MJ5QK9pu*G|;jHo&|ac zq~iZagZ|F9B|ER-raQL|_q@haavp6|&*eX*@|wvSNSv&r==`GNswp~qE)wbLfRP2W z+FHfR@U0K>R?rBT)u07enFC`sg%Q|3T~c`fHn8(iq3@%tam2MX%NYpGmd@5h_(=@Od|O(vZD=&g zJ_B@y!<)vZk-kR~pQQtUJLD`ZGI->R$GvcN)U$-sPE@D|AS0uMgF>~)F@>k8#d-xj z%7Z6MlvZt6nVS(6h}$S->vvsfrmHXs3EdV7#+z$l-fyYgqXlxbSz+C@yotuOe~%y8 z;ZQ5L*POEsLk~OZ`tg7wz7;)HQy#G`+}TqL08zzQvp8WCx@KZ_2I{m>5MqbM_ifB$g!VE9&VTuV{M{19maYri5lthm6rt?*7ElU9!>g!iqgPF~&?TYen zGB<&Ok!u4H<*hM-S8+%|r{Uf%uXltp$Yt4N3C~CB%Z}SYVNm!*gAk_cY43bZT0WJ& zP0`{&a&#Iit%tx97N?DN;lHS%@wbTE%H!54Sf3b_1jctkAv$RkduhG7d@Pw5B$g!r z!iUs8-a#$i4ZTH`L_jetr<=5S^z3W+=gv2C(#b9gRs;lSr2reP`YHQEoWNVle?iS? z%8vmenxNiVwyq7*=RvDG0(DB5SPUCqKkDQO0-Gmmw_s;Qdz==c+2+(fjuzHqtj|uJ zsm0=gZ9!1IWh;ORVi^9{cAQ~{h!SDhA`>6pyx$qIvMdi2@Uw6)3%U8ok;DG z4#3T{Q&$h%N**Wb;_ggxF&)0Z0Z_}sn{Y??jsIM)ZyajhOhK0^V?14IaLapgEvbn& zo4Xs3vovK3u55G0R2A!aEFykZ6Is9;d}R*zag1slUO#f{>CsCyZD+-m3IL0 z^=ucEN`*KcLfFB(CSvdElIe1)K~f{R$Vm7iOJX%CUOuxYjGFb<&Krmxg~X%NP=q}* zr?g{ruViSQRp#06Qj~!%{E4Sm^??SRn9ldk5U)>}ZgW8{3HS@uGp5IOyeL_%@W#SowRqDj;H*HZmM zk6P83d1Q;brkXQ84(;U5+ygiB!)D;)|FjRzSw8h47-9_*HuH@8oO!lqI7Cgd*%*;0m`|nhq*@GS;PW)z081?KZDHb&?NR&9R^~YVmPy83n+VX=uBH@-zq) zM;EX$F%fv|zmZ!N)i(Qh&#Kg0vVi%|hONR^!x?=HOPqkF(z$ShNX5~7EB)(42eC_a z>7m+s%;V2hQ~FAm{$h9ZH9!#+=EC&`N2BHpS}0e|QsSIP@L0nhh5@qd7?;JcSq_au zXB$uG@}TX$UD&RYK~mHY{L`IB+Xdaz6shWqsJ39b2Rg>^TiGnUunl_tSww6|2rzd6 ziDvhYdR}@ei-;PEsEM?>+bW=N?-AQ;4E5RP;fcDx!EDe`8YbL7vjp=T=P?t-Pt){6 z<_wZQPNke1o$MmMNGGLZ7IQz}$}G~)Li^b}rHn(;PdB|7me{-~_9|AjaPbKFR>U0P z7%XoB55kcP<0u$ob(jd$nk=x1sI|xm!DxkI>j&?~JmB8LSd9`IhM+B%bT0oIfDzNO z#CY6e(R6D+s*#@ksmi#?h%XSKlp1znCU+Kggw{*b*<$MW=tPtDEb%~5`3Zn+3L&WR zT*$f?t03PqH#Dbm3?w5C2`q|1b?fxoTH}1MkmS-b@_tH@IwDEH8X`zs-c--T(-E*Z zUFGC)b0dwl^r>{aq&tT6HHjpiy`c_clnTD`!n%^)`dyhC}i9(4MU)3wZT#ms1>*At=0 zcJBR^$Yl~n=S%Cm{2){ALJhOdmP}D22(t}S83T*&ByWDCUD#pGbXJATn_;o2yh1{I z(y!Kx04*c%34}!pzJb{(eY>#`*m1Xkz61*}mQO$lep}9!JohN@MFYMV{N(NFCoV8B${3=A#8IO$Fo0};K|GGD?` z!)^C$oDk!zqsgu{I=_jY(LI!%yjqUViExMnOTTiGO&LW>7e}7urH3|^+aWv&jl9r} z^NdQ&rOIWU14iRVlU>3n;eqmTR`!)~H+H^~>Dlq-nx(*EIehH1f#PW87G`#)+-zZP zH6?GFY>#zn#Ip_Pf*$uave3v{%s7n6#Kg)0(Xkbhto;7Nvh3^LZ6#azLP8t)&r9HH|GH#pA^XxP2lz_f zIaOqE_x5ed_BE`E!FjJvHch`eeate@AbYD>)+IMoKFsr?gc>Ld_oP%%1wW@$96I&u z>*}gyhZ3DNf?0CHtPhiuFtax0Hj*3dnZ)PB_NefTpC{Tr0Y!N_SRS4nbh&$%cGIS=@#C z7z00aI(O(_SB@dWRcJZgzhv3{E97Vnp6W(nCN+>QLcOh@GVw8c=!vg9 zdAzSU4qn?~s^wu87{^3`N7pi+pEs;?Bb8(+bO>ke;QQt2O!L_?4;Thh9<9}^?T$eR5s1@*=RFKy9u zg*ZQJs#vP3(+CHD3eSKG-FG0T6w229^o>Tqq}JYF1dD&~EQT)9&vFMN4{u!`IadsU z<_tE@xeJ@DJ*f*x@#>U+uyxD4op&D7stjA4YQ;E0<%sOD*R-waMNj``N-O}yS?kx- zLSpsY&(|9dU2t1g`ID9P+fy!fWD-?|c$xkNQj z2^aMgzA7=!n1(jtPF6CwR?-ZDZ*3|}EsVCmlnqwnMODKgmS&zrdYNNjSZWjJp7Nv` zbEawND%c2x3oyM90A++w?6WnMvvz!(A5*w$0F5|`0)uQ82HyB6kFjdng7+wb2pq`bYt=a>mt-r|IW6966&)uV!k+gn^+)(wCPO@f^{f6Ds z43mlbm!`icw7c`+`ybxS@-szIs|fn~bCNgJetQO5bb@1CBwMcW;lm?N7`Adp0LgV$ zQ&GKO8<1+ywK_<7bMU_!EhkTRq2z`%*`i`wT5)( zIr705?j>KFmlSV-lB(-ArFFn>WuF+93Waozat_XTK0XDE7HnB|)2RSk zv}u`-O$>P599tukBOOn58Q+%9IH6*fQbn_r+GWQQ+IW&m)z9aDVhGiRD(I!7_FK)aGi9R-YN(R9#aDb09`|572!D?qeexbI`)? zaHg%u4|b?3b=;cWIe_qu+u9^c^#~y1B$R|B!iX=>GanfJ;S00^gWqp~*wtsvRH-9; z0%nD0ubMbaMXd68sqG_JIK{U6qRe5=&#U5Zi7cMV!-n*Ca){U&OeR9(MuS}9J(yHg zyf!Ax{<1@05?FzTvkvbs+`aLP^3I!o_NIA*6iLJZ}y zsSlyLdMPX?O|S#mw+288p7E5!MwWkG-X4iJlecMkF;!?J&4+xLWh#6-A(8Rz0k5M& zGqF1l_m!JKpCTJlcQt=^rGjifmqy6Q3;j za7a#T)gJHe>pGr%(A!Z{p9Rz(^`QT#a-$sHlJm&QnTE^4H&$f5iXY&mr|juq?D5=> zFamw+hlCFZHE7Ztgl30YR^=t4S-oIC>2fn@#vp$Z5+n*^bO1xkvBCnZ>0%RFoxL`* zoVW+MKgEeE>VIUCj8}&GV1} z)ke53WY)zj4h9{S*fz5Mb-Azi1s+<{C^1rLH)JZatE0NajBd1DuBIsA(*3j#T>{hm zHIa}|MyR=Im~+)A*6Z|PUGj|yDFuHQI3Y$PY@hk5qFLOBDnDYIbHD(oXPrlSS;I52GQH{RUBRE*NJJsC3bZ3z0gHbJ*B>aQSqwTYz`-Ouy3ctNh3#oxrA-+7p=~=R1v}O zP2Sc=u0Q%!&XUY5X=);Dx%1(Nw`U4YhfW)`&Ajdk^=%l9-o1V2z3j$6<-;-m3Sg~U z&%qG7mjcX}IkKIpB1GKrP0a-e3+zdU(9V^L`iUy-84nK!lXTD|;M8ZH?-0xPv)i|` zK%QvQYi#q-81#k}x%2*efBW$-x8=QgZPSa1I;imzSw3pW2t{YNxzSAWB<7X;sO&j- zjHJ{@uv-L`#4k^uC_IxrA+W#6H`eU@cx=64ug=k*lJ7CLpbgcS#SfY?a5wP zkY1^xhhYzM@XA?{vN?`>tn#5hf8vrF#=aqkcTsZJ4qd`76l%{VbeEEk;>IaKK)Z)1 zikzTUr_=H@CCv&Y+%k!&U7_E;*~Ib4Nz)4I+pzUFw^F;?`^@tN<(+BEi3C;THgBkY zX`1`ImHpQXni>kXA>RXj-XY5jM&j_C&7+!ya%raI#DU}Ox&_ZudF6ku=`rMa#p2b$ zE3Z!z>)H2lTn|ic!?1b~ZoC(jk!ZvvD~%%-IB?Z$3l?W)R`nt|S365!ekI0p zG>TE>crp!l)-g?A$ryrwPh>4en5ohs{RZ`u}y%b#d z(l~dk-L*vvE-kk<-Sy5Vhc@VbTrP&T@H43POXRTa(o>L-&bBkfDSZP=P!v_DDw9+= zXS5vzDT%C-In~)YNJf7IsQL?Usguzm%uRmt3_KH)t|m)0TsSB8Mu4oJP>)o zsDMv=bO4PX18|XqmQE3*vux`ryOb>M(>`r|aD=^x6eX1Ku#aYqHQHv?cnow=YOD$k-o(Z_B*OGuwh*%7GDps zyTzd^95<0pWja76a{f}eK9E8{9H(8Ewf-J_DX=Ig&ya$y%RE(y<)%tsX`?@K3g(_U z&}1L#KEdmMd6`&Z7j@=>iUwg$zznwho{(kjCVaj_Ka~12E88V!sZ>E! zKOB|x5?SXP+T+0_SJ)l!uK+Oc7!yx`vX)dzvB4$}tOdbXX=Hjf3|FjPl~W`RU#YYr zA&xtTP$6XnQHg7c^~}-G{OR90q^C{KpZ*%f+KGIZurv$Op5p_%LxK4lNmBEw%6_{l zL+_^Ju$e3;SuF!K)bZ&bdtR0NUWJE!eN;=QUB1jqMk4uEhX?s6t@P^1FFtowL&tu@ zzHr(i`&X?aBaGa8_HjE=O3K;&pWWOI8hDV~-a&V%OZvu|Dt2>puw-yYgZSn zn{_U`{zhdgM>c^-N^EL$NG`W@*fTe0)2zS&t56p~=qWCMMaapMJkvT-y3n3Iw+J=R{&OLJIsufc$ldPT9=)vFCZ7Y`HI9VL5^i7K9S_Q zJd%iS9%Nl4kozKE&VhxfB@3IKAA%^`FonAi8YFGtq`q}4`{#PBf_OsyY|H;U!$pu7 zH}+t=s0*!Gyk51=2u39rGuzuH5^P#{9Eun7Q5zf1nvjjqie8FS=n)OEK@18u#yu=c zNZ|GelrbhboqHh-mJ&dO`YTsUntJ+J?(M6RQ|A&LAS^#Y10c%GB>-%R_)_7a5m(_@ zItKBeFEk|clT7Nv6fU7~#GBM}>x2VXk@Y8=ow}Y@fPKZ!vg^s4vqeDDvIEnlS!U-& zxXT0hzB6tv!fs&kDs13%g7_6V)7JA3(&Kti&x!GN^Zm4`f0m0@Cv7-t<_QQQwE9hH5gx8I-sQOPJ2B3pY|231!^tvXG7${_Qe%XP&^y6QYfnU+8y}&uYAYu zeo|I6HMP>1a@O*l%@MJp9fw^;OxchNMq$hs{`n4lb6^_vV@{cAj8LQ6S7XDcp{J@g z#{)4nS43S-Q^j)>C$wx=S}Ov^lag1R0k%Q~&KClWP~CrFe2XtkzDk1xpOWrFH2`#4 zF#?x&;juu6MK&r%%|+|~)s3i+m2WyJGs1Fghia)jD6Z?o%M@O5#>XedZK!%OkPtX3 zl!iq90HSXEq>rX9J(o32;zX_@FmG29qiUU9;p4mr4eJ!nLXZecgPokVahEbb?#M)_ z$`O$5vF71g*-5#aGn>dLRnHh_?eyP1@BQk)|g3|YMK);5qB2JPN4u^FTP z-b;q6{*Oyvwv+Dl2N0EmSwpTs?(Ez+R%sb0?w+qDmEmb$5~y55@Bp_Eemq1gT^}}{ zf9sW($eU6sO2HZI*1uX~k6gcC_P*CPt4{xr5GqD^i}%^3SAC{Una~?fc)E9tYKY}K zFW7~+n`$g23F@fI9jAl}3ERV{k_9$~eEyr)iq{bcPqZQSTC)8ph#5XCe+cd|J^Hzw zYUc%OOpisMh?3Bb zp=yK0si`h}K!O4CZ@oM^zF))<8i@n8{5F_nH{Prix8mm)3m;hQzwh{Br}nj* z#kyEP<6`Bb6g&r}J>(t+v;!m$$gyUzXni9lXqlK?(tL;`STkQYo%sn`6|wWDC|@#w zM5^;IqmNRlNa`nHGRjnB6XbzBGx!U8Nxr#Jj6{iw9P>f{9f|VK?o}Axbi;K}5ZXzW z>s*9|*-?GUN@1~YHBYi6UnetJ?^zl<&l7Ks>J3S-R7^y!o4|X*-l82J6?jY-Bg7Lr zEd?yk=@aI-6d7VlI4w>*C=7Ezv&KY`Q=L8|;X4GS+{6jqR4(nr`e<}iTKV)!)PYJh zvZqemXIr-UdQE#?0@{uG@&Up$pQPG!uUCy^t36PV5K5$C%FJ=`Gw2tc(l64<%uKy6 zpk0_0jmpNa0fFl!mOZN9u?Ub%z92bO!cpv@z_Mr3rL!zuFU|I?!|mgs>3W-9@)YH% zi4Gw*m+#2faB*MOgQptyyeIHDM!*DdPL{qitbCszH-iyfd3p0Lw#-!ZMQ8Rcecak& z$2NvbV%1dXGxApF1^k?s{PRez7L{3+KcTF`%b9B}X6%@hDu965C=-f&aoZ-;0m~9D zN_z{CUW*;Rs$8lE)>v1ku!GE}5!UMWx4h?s1E$mRaZ~c_hTJv6t$fLx)sd)X7?pBn z=aMW)WPl}2W|9M^bJg#nClk^H)<|##1}~fWdCD#s15l<`*BS3+5UBE;RI`+Mfy8IN zSLH8z>mo7Um~aA*I%3CEtlcx%Ub_VJ{8MudaGz6BCQjWZI@91;mcu>wh!PA@`r%Om zws(d=ov$*2H20!ncM`2~C*jIeVvRLx956d2Q@Tv6|L+hu#RE5uMGK@KUXZ+-HgG`A zsx6O)L~zx{bG3;c&g*2b9b1p6f-&)mh%sfo+%TP%eE1r;Pci+*k zO&y}5JmQEk`jFPys)D|$r^h9COBVqU2v|LxLg1FI=blg=;bS1aVo-xPC%)DjK%+nTefGKFrOt|nD zfn#D1(2J{27Dl`b`K}i5o2FHvXW#a+5pZk1q*c_{c_~8j?P~%f2$Bci9snMA?Ht;L zGe^FdShy}l%>bl(24E3;37$YAUx3&rrsz|TpMWnuz+{r@ftsHwEi6`qB_L)nz6nT^ zs{xxt1xm3H*cV+NwxEHBa1Rn?9PNmS>D|cc10?a3_Ty7r`ir<}{}r>W=Y7RH4E+w& zH&FLt$0gl9iO@T0*b_Y%)@nn;ZOVkaOZH=y$zKs4FjBk23~_V0&cwc`^C9IseQIC|QcP#XWEJMy zGBLO9NmHj8SM4ew)8W!Ufv|BYMtNwDsqR-9+Z_#zxxi_oJ?%)O+ z-~;`@Up5xBx2pGAAuv?#(;i01Gsev$*O_!x@{~^4b2sR-v_@wud)sa#K*B;7&e%jT5u;81*A~iXQ+|N#i3Op*ogUv2 z71`%I5nR-3KZri$C%E&rw;((2taw31(*njU7sQR71WB`?1{VKr6hp;JPqaf&0is2N z;RthD;-_UZYaADTNg$IA%Nzh!cp+wRA65pN{JdXYX_Jn)2H5%zG*wwVG5E=LGx8(s z=tJ+}E8gXOPi0CgiHin4Y$XF}jW``O$O5tCKGz`Yu7+ z)rXLy_IS+M_EW|CyINiy^a(^xs=bgFpkC&Z-k%wSiVbiEK8m4-8XrZadnGX6nF+YH zZ+Cpbv*l=8mCtsOH%Z?x*QwPGwm%)n)yaJ(JRX1Y(_as1i5^;ebZ75WB=07QTc;x|L0%c%+&Qg?M+%{UP7Gi!VLEDbXFMtT55c zu7HB7V**l!S*7II|dwe}_kC*3HZ8^t3 zm-62SO{E`m=V$NwQ!@VjyC1%L?(g5febM`WcK+`_IRE|ce|S5&W`AwHUThmK`qwT8 zoZ22--wt6Dg*O%Y|Nf`nrZ;xZ<1Bswk-WCkAGaTa`pJJjg>KsL4fdHA+n#Sq@h)@M z>vS-oD5s z=qY?VuKxMYfSYL2XYlgY|M}PZmtI0@Tx8m`WnGk;-A3{=E;-NVnbz`>d|$!#BI(GVgEwy79!M(du8k-fzb!S^q!au3lmw{D6`V z!%KJ&&%f}$K^1N>kn5vtuWekrmnD7v6*~U`JpU?x79m*a+_D-t9oL#=DZS5pgf|Qz z|7#lrU#sWy;XwmfrL*C-ObRy*POpZwR> zV+e{zZBE@JG_OFA&|%)GXd}nBfv%u=H_WeQKPQM2U-75%=_8z$&d*Kjd67qf%FOPg z*tqtxh~ec%Xa^1r_GFMApmzjj6pspffsX(4KWv~Or!cxh-wc6&o6=}S-h-Lmgo-NO z_@(SLZ(`AX#-iVVP$#?5xkm#ge&t}VO>p77uE(3WbPsmbH#;M*5Ja~;EmB_h-IXlq zn~3w8N1V0l%0m7zP7pXcU9_Kyje+ zNIHJf?dE4T=!wKRQ3uL*N-b}qwu41&9|!CnuvhD*rr>q~)#)oY%-#fUPe&&Z!4{56 zq-yMDV-`AtomL3!7~<)Pc@x+j=E_S}B}g_E_G;TTeAyVVG>5;J#;BQMN^DvV0t7&&2%yo6zepPvx7E zl+eat+EK__r$NV5!{E*+A}zlH<0?OW-I#{hrlFz}rN-U_UIz=jz6w0)V%H!b$bZX$ zDM&tmNbD((;7thj0%zunz-=q>Rk!w(8Nqs;KKV|vm-4t(YT{mEvev)di$!U4)}G<( zdJ~QvBpma7))dFj%rTMmk=yl;@=auRkVkS}cS)xagw35! zC8pF|I-O`Q1kFPJrY8<;NzDlfEgnJ+%7%sE&ho^PPC+4&ZosIZGM?MmFV#l!jTh2q zcvcu<>Fftew1l6MY}0;G^ezdW!|#&-I$=AUg!Uj^+xkC$Kg@SkB`g!Jr&G$AO~g!+ z-g+|Ed$>8=3(1vL^4Jz!MOydr-OnV2G}S{r_#IsYm_OW;bC;5$zp4@sx3bSkuI4h5 zh=N-c{dtfbC{c%JkkMi@9DY9F_*5ears?fhmy-r0Ar}aeaxZz4n?JuFb+x==jmAHw zoMk$WRifi)YF}jAoM;4G8R@%m6yUBR+O{_yuBRUkQ->gV!&DF3Lf9aGgbSEAYdH>M zwco>AzI2FXBHIVfU+`H_B4cQk+0V5_nJ8`W_teKORt{?CXREksOJ@Gxg$pHk3S~bx zAq7U(%X;a@;p<_o?<%Wp74n++;%9UJ%RBzQ!=LP1u6JCfJ#LzB*LnNx*G5ZF&VT;a zJNURdU&~7W?sva&3%i-${qA?)G{w8`zyIDlzq@n$-FM!*^TCH7zV9EOea@%6GW(Rb z4`glk%ItObmi&**8i#iimz|!pWOtc~y^d@6l9x_L6I^GRW^WCG=RC8okWBVVCY$?s z>k4YBoj!p=Z644|o3`g>i1pmD-~Fwg1GN*uB=i;Z}qjY%g^1#(wY(ifv#4IvL>!)u1Q+yMB??Pb)hYJ6oY zW?8Z)ubrx|R#q)xJAdtODTt1DDqU`&LdY>m!mWzJmD}cJs$6=hh`JlCmIRg(J2t49 zDpwJGY`4?&_R6NIXzDC!M#$xsYrt{Y*&~T9shfF4bNKr8aSI_F-Bea}t;bhJy>2#{ zdVF&S=C3gNusQvYYKMGM4t^9(@3MPd*t|J@=nxpIYOtb=G*tGnaoTt6Ze?egWKCaT z#MD(lf(cull!z=k|B1r#B~(PILhmJ*bceKI8d5o?JC~|Iw>$OBMRVfP=S#Bd9Ng?! zPES|ZdTn-99kss#9dI2vwf#pLA(@XRV}zN>X2s!Ei8=o|nG#zZy*^R$J(!fjQ%jXQ z9E8T23`)HYLJ4L#VJ=MjlhXz~Uz)a#OL(lCiQa7sAFF!Q&f$iE`vnK_$Hrueh0%u*K$bBpOY9$9`vvHYxusGM;_T*Q2do*{IY$&lY zD6<3Kp%FuNR-@7|p01}cmdks^*_A4_WVS(B#|Ctu1H@kI9xDhb9kJjg3K8a)(I zGg3{h7FkKZSLv64W%P+=M-S3ztB8U$xIe3!l2!E{1-Hm|ug6G>Q}c3L&WDa(b`I~B zsAhds?+bTO1yl-bsKHH$eyE)5 z34N`2C>C|NspMJk8*hr47!kwbep*L~9NZBWVX$^hV(Qa;I}db|en?dTh9(wb@^xx^ zLnk~mR%7$1ZH^Ha+{!-5W&N^WwYfW%T_vBQzxb`ICHVV3yYbCRHc|e)eAFWQRIW$7 zv&3ez?C$NmcW&Yl%Qr1`pTHKGv=0ST$=)$`vST&Vs54s}&s&%O*05=<|EOh-?OCdZ7gYx&^ePZS z`ZB1-nSEf831$Sk4%t_wYh^JWRC%YzpL;`2coZ`sL$&@91HJ6Voe$rCN31NBGN5wm zeZ3tYgMBF_EuSZ>6~YLYW=ZMis*fkZEyK%khx^Vb&4-TCl? zcVq+0jNSV9=pDw1V9a-V2V8o~-v*xvXN| z!BjD$2m+8D_X(HUrCEd~KDJT2WXDzT+YiPXJ(Zm%b8a|J!Bu5}_TLyKlM(cA9*P{S z%(~&d6PN{%IyE89Y&uV}?X?;yX>p|6v4cesgwUexlDqAj*f7G%Q6HSw` zWyDcP}Y$d1!D;K#9;c)ZbRmeI?!Ioul`FWSJ5CAa*~ za#VVFVASJ007_D<(|;RwoG@LdMJ6cy$!DHEwoeIR37zPI%V(arwJL`mBYid+_=GXj z)E@`Ys19|fISJ)`CdYE-ypikdJdeFPYv|Z9602ZJdNC$1{v`HUNxxc){|jtO3CtEq z%F#lkvW^+t7uZj=uWb;A#Z&RS+yhw$-@DG$Q9oH*j$&z?fj@*s!SP zYeeB5Iq}Find?p2#z0NBGQPK)UC`VQZYYIR)J=U9^C`{F?UY%}Vl{0OL{)`Xmi~%z zmK7Gf4D2`L^KxmGPSgcXI+IUOqg^IzstSXv6G`iolK&}0!q;B2@4mm&j8y-@IE<0}vH$xn*?W&#pvI?om+Sop!etHzP#acB^&vIlLK{dErqB~(SSD7yD<}@3`hR%~wIpALT4)wKX9*}z z1Gk?3R+8D8wb}~jXw|Hn<>?bS%q9n~VuO55a_zh*?XvYvsOT|%j@_Ejm>F3i-fk-& z{g@bR5*6U+OS;DBY>i`gYyv=MC=5(dR*V9KJDW{g?z*IFr*wL$Ci9N4l$U63wFVf? z5trYJ?P>|D3+vdIMrw1f{LSXj3t-@`E}K`40QXl4H?_~f>a0e6R?pFmcK}m3Pin7D zBQ`&Ss~5A#kLd^6EUa*?57#GJ7KM7zCi>9rxG2I;Dw?^fBD1%X!_Tn7Z!eAfTWo(N%|>`x?dpx^cmB}#Lc~y_7lpovH8>YCd->PADLmj zOo*vowdsrs!P>~}^&It={k}-7#?NMD~8Vr5!+JF+;BkjG?_sa#EJuAZX zCF8ShW#6P?l~kHTOXLqs_7V|RIR*}9AB9zYHKKXc!2#bD!B5T;o-o%H9>LTC-BmEpus?G?5!kXZmJor&a-Gp`Y-I z1eBlW2q-(>RP9vT-q^8|L{RyD9GthS-KeWRmxS0@p)bY0WjAUxMHM48e)J>*>`G13a940Zm7@2)$d_|` zWGz{Y3T}qohc-XoCO1J)K!W>2@x!4Qxn&{Be<$w7NUl9%L1G%#VbE0_mgrDRE_E{o z=iSh96y?x{~bS5zAQwVg!@R zOnv1;S{Mq#-G=Pzd?lG+Ecvo+AW_FaTp-?|Ep^zaY6qP;Y8&t=`iA_ga+={3`{(m) zd)QUKI{kl+-M3Yled9KVs3^^IR_})FzlkF+D;!!Dp7ZUk?4NEOJ-C(K__|oF%Xtrc z#+}=L`|&RyWuKG|E`NnXoL9H_%H5kpQZ$Q2tKpe^*bpqfO1XxhPV0*~TlEqpcZehU z&{{y<&`Kr|wSheglLRfHQY5Wu zMinWkW{Q+rWVh_zjVzGiNCX)fk&FijaMjyhYdd46(MDCeX6lXZYIcJ454rtIu7BS- z$K4~5Ks}i02^6s*3z>;Tgoi)Q<9qlyvX%miKgUFzh;>_BxX@IxVWvC{#n+=2$)|cf$bEYo%6Vc3zCb-0qk-{<8oA}E+y^ke1|mvP35hZd ztZmu!XsV@_>NL`1_gIcML3$Jye;Xi6gQ=UwIx@17u_rk6aQ;ZhnkYo9L?wp>#)q^2 zQ5Sw|3^RV}M2zc{o?uT7_qk8T&(ZNg?LCfkgNFD2tV*5lQu3C+@L&J-zcBaobVWMz z*H!csj#zt*rW9)xPi}OWnjy*L4X1f~qM}a?>}0U62`zuF{W4t|e#(uaHXO~A-HQ;T zx0fQvVoZvQFpS-YJWnreO=+tNWpFshOT}C2IK)Y4-A`+}x)7e)X31SW zAeXrYyCIp9ey@=P{nhjbb`fx${V;RL9kqM163FjKqd4(lk~5Q)$H`_YT2Zav2fa1{v$5*yF~e zagQk7P$5Li35h{^jCy9QS@c(CjM0-c4uaAQl>0kDliiNUK}04r!eVwIL`G4YaGO;u zOMUU-MWshz&b2XU6+5Yfjq$84XNy85m3E%iJ)AujogkTk^O;{6gTOYWcIb!6tu&56 z_5w8XVB7|oajwzifS9dkOF^;($yL%6unEN-y`KoI2UM4za{fJwr23HVNRW{{u*M0P zTA*lEt<8UDYoyfWQ5ywM7lee~Ox4;P_{Cp=1FQuV<`ZLU<1)eQKt#koMYOGP$}O1^+%~+p*#9B8Fn+y=v7=r8URW_wZBm!>T^)q!Xe$w z^tYMuVLwMX%Is*ga8i@tKH>H&?=Sp7ZPZmI2xp};S=q&H=}7v?BWHUlg)}2KhFY7z zlqJZp8eLCts-VfW@&<{8o3_aV3}#T)jis+~wdnzDa_^-q=a(|_%gFHnDe|h$DTsrW zpzoyS&9XU*-U4xDy%|&E3qR85v(Lw-$-T~gU(`ocSIwS;R^<5}R@tKu-hcN#x<|im zzbm?O_BqP)=eh6o6HI43f!SkZ4~rMc{OnXB?9m4waHCOqP{wHJXx8mQk_A60dYL@3 zCh?)Qc83j;CT(@BS9GkJqC;kUJP*I%;NzxU{nfejDP0tf zXk&z|v((z+T$4~q5xD)79Rj@AgAl2h;2a*hAFO0b3n5iBsZ}b*rv^dXPImmuxigL` zADY%G>LDvqHy|W40RX%~SIHS!Xbrox5`MNmaWyLhpJu?X)Gu6@YkTom{A6JMy2uWCpSomyj&QNupeS`oari6kyFBLGtfHi_)FcVd0Ksk|7 zl|*T@B7%@=lmu);x+NKi&6xA^Z3##Ub_wM09*mZ5Kx8{2J$5YFLF+_T6h19 zwSv0sdV{qmR9%-iQ_XEc3*b7sPLh7nFAD4{Q+g*0142OzzoTKMcF|*@E`N~@A)DY9 z)l@r`(%6?6?8kGxQ|T)UlV^+ox1bud1Ny{|8-o31wXyc&hE!bUvP{yiDXJjJ0=VU* z9aNux|2G!FrjRG&>^~UaF{=5d4sJ@| z4N)++$Ld8zrkgm>$lGq}P?P4oa2C=41bNFw_aTI~R@ID3hc|SXw_o{z=@>$`zhzJR z#y;YY>jQWCMT4f{5o|5;OYZYGXS`m^2jV8q$P8)rb&p-ECJ9*cmW|)6T`b16iTnmZ zoRqo-J;ED0jX$>bu*mioYrzM*t~Y*8qCi4qv1^P@NG*q}ZI#;*$xXD2k!iDqX|Sbr&di$l}jZb#YiX$HLU z3*(gCI+0u!=uSFP17ubrKsayVi=75lq!K-2(@0m&SkudCkY}tymjRS2h0l;A)k7>N zQIpi3f`2>bXhm^=o-D6o7+G(tNaM*=Jfsj3_$h8M3CXm$t6i3@^;$>`#AD>)Y@0e) z-uBM zv_a>l0}liTN}AU6t-8okGEEe9`c&P25qGIe8dT$6b+b#VV=qV2 z%r<->{K}2G_dNtbG5A%`v`xH6Zb=yOm~F3#PQ57Z&mRUx_oIux5C|Bo^8$_wX95i0DispdZ2HCtQ$%%cAO#tu836qxL2E_l?^X zKYk3^Y|PkSd{^Lf{KeRP;{)BOTBPf3yl-C6{mrr1@Xo$$3%Siy1a!xv;Br@PAb ziyhZ6FGMe9X8H#g-wMlDn<8S_U1A^7f`uuRIZU?C}_Jf=3S%O|x@8 zQGa%GCkG>dHkDVohcqNw7AFu zsfNGgHMCa53dou>LoMh?3Up#RX{Ja$E%T0@xX0k%ezj948Ujlq@cDqg9R9Ppf=Oez zh(-;r0=_Xl5GW7$8og!0j593~J-u~Wi}<$B+_Vbg?C_L;QcXuw%MpZcko#=N52k(Q zSc_KfIzZu}{!~isQf2yMaXb{6g?Nuc z)tM6pw>xtBjcP#2Y=5as3sG0+qUA)W;h0G8^LKMjKGW(8DP>CKGJ{8&0{gupWA1E< zef|M0LcOrhzc_<)kTiJOaY&N(jKOmlfn(-gsn*l}ts{4QGrws#vv62#2$n`s`FOnj zx?NY))*8zPEowS`*Xzm$1totM^el{KM7nY0J-Yr!;d7}b)9K}Rzl%T36UJcP-2xJz zRwxirDdU!9JAe{^m&PvYkD1gN=J|IDJ=t8J9@N1?4OQN<9gosk%7R4BlbbY_o_r3m zNiQG@zait-A7JbT*N~#O=y05VOFMQ;9H`eX=lEP+=|DMQsKiJPc?g<7Sz8NFlUiCT zx8}}N(lCi=MsZiu=ROZtJ&9eI%wbxijcdGWzsm88)N5cGGP7t;gCHMS_^}aInIvj# zA0SK2`TUA{FgH_C6o_6e?6*lAk!zmIC8X)*+Alm~Y_!J06GW8epig7aHYrEZbTo4h zO<^tFMjed$yCAMswd^N}mv{EKEOvc_L5dcx0&tV=m6NvgEs0A$YmO03gvjHQBUcxz ziS_1#%PICNrONvf&|4QxLw#9G@G~dx%jI`P?enHwOFVWiaMQsS+wx*{vou-TLmX*h zhuTM}as&cscTmbzeZI9Y=h8$!*9rDG_Iu{RXuwA>&$RMI&nFdBW)W&tH9lc?^T~N9 zh7c=j1^wqA$J0*rDj*a7p(>6FDg*x*6T$X)Y=^RwooiDaWSW;3z<6@e{lnxC@!#z~;v z-q}Zo!AAI)p%Tf8)3&Pl514;-6p68GS6UkiLjb_jK42Ro$pI*YxPb zfJ8=sc$o8AB@%yf6z8Q5F9vY~70+qkc{@%?!b3PyMREZIhK}t2exBGtt5Y**M@oSilK>H7u9CRf%Zt{@P{+Q&}t64~I_S#$XS5fjy2_jz0 z0S}dc5`aT!68vD4YW9g4W!}VZZ|4V($fNCj9%NQ1pU0|>NFz*6)3#|+Oj?w;KS=0N z8R#uQ;-Y$TBE7hWkR$xToVP1ogkUyq4g6d{j!C!B;6aVq6m_dhuAu?w0CVnc5DEMB z#q+XQQlJC90#*{`9kaqvgATew1=nts61L)9qYjtouQM!hdF4eJZ4^!L=j6^K?(3(c z&(cN;ZTjGGA&zfaLEOhKbUT94Ai;#zn79YQk`>s-P27ZvWgyOgh=FpnB&imOm#z_h-f)}gJ=NbWFJ)w|Li52+^ln-xf z7Gd}l#qN-!+&oB{Jh|D(BgJ@o9r3|73@vOz?6I>ZWu_ql2A0V7RiK-I&(=ZBxelt* zk&MNh^GTglXAypNqw0XW%R*>muarKR5_u}0s+jkN1S!e}=&MpVdM1;u(5HE1=w|(r&8{#~vc8d4RTG@zwG@h{v~k;%1sfs8L2Ru_tuSXVS0NW2ymkW2O9emenC;9iaRSo*IYq_4z!@rD}uXXRLQWjp&< zAHP;z%Z=!9;U{o=2weH&qG_rloD?g<4_0G6sGXy{m}yzxBMB^z!c=CZG)S%c}uB)(ygio;-#HBhBgx? zEL1-v31%m_!-vt>sRwJ&$h%WbTy19&HlO&lPhE6_I?Dq!fS8B+UeIkp+l=7s-lt+d z)sZ&>e_|D5jwD>I)zU0 zFx6&^l@&yrz+nFyrXS=m%wGDuKcF%o-9gS5`M3 z+xnI7l3jlh%g_`U>tG;f6c>Wx@|kBN>6nPv%#&sESK#tW)!JD}3fgvJW@VRsT&(=T z1fyGoG}1hTlVR++N_2;k83yLTC&D8 zJYz5ZQiRfUFYH+AQu?Oe(}GlK*TC|E!rfQV$=Bf6Q3cs&H3z0=U~^J+qCcG zT(9)Ys#)eLQat+L=kH4$Mt3>^;)PjMQekY!S=o@X_25kHn8gW1 zp;AmJY0uaX)iScMFcGsR;32%a2Xc;?-@jKIK79_FIrMT8 zU&=k4pH?(tVZsd|Nkb3w#vOp$AMWP@WHJ6z+RQl?=Dvup1XXbrkh^%+5&6fIi&f_k zJ^x>AHy#xSO&X4hqoOXp%au6XTX&2_A7G1-J>|*q#s9v~dJmd*q2e>)ie|67vegIT z(4cnW0M_-=fAHsSuAJTPCe%CbZ1;sireG1Qd}hYBeeSTU%|(yAuO|#+Yd!VFfm3P^ zr+Q{)XVpbO{iEnRJNind0zG1eTjj;#`L%;sw62`0+p4*`&-AeEAZbL3 zNgZop+=0k-()y%Oqgb~J4RP^GKh~UPGBsTq%-HgIJ_Le_L^Dag1bQLOH%FpRc(q0mB^(8yrQXOC@G7~!*zU+qK(3nOt_aql*+fQs^oDlZ zU`{hg@3`~GQEuj?Lh}_Fdul8Q)(FkCF0C!~v26*)Yl#hlI$1pZh~e$bq?qJl+9q#N z$B+OWOH~72X^cd7Vm(Jkm9soRo@0%ZxB;SyBD>=>a!*C~b4KgZYO)@V!uUepvmd)D z$2&p8vRo(o#$58Ixs~ZeM`DgRa3NR%H<)V(n-QaJ!TBTqQ;KaU6mE6opTNa`U^e+{ z@(0AImH{aCv?EwFN8LE6XT#37$J?^$nL|Ufxo0UPaQ}p>14m(dv!OCR95w7C- zv9JX=h8kZ>o7QH%py1A3b9wDZqErp8vnne4iv-C4IFrPBoUFZ4TT~X<=!#a6RN0%9 zrj8m*e_75~%WH|dgcQu9WwHLOC7K}9t#U9lPqxHFP1F4dG@08MD%LcgT^7aNhDgXY zgA5D3t{^tqi-TOBv=gK2c(V!K_J?gpEMf6t62y*4qq)XM1UOVse($%Juo`mRU?PMp zE)1C-W7sNl-KY?*aGM&O6^kJ60s^Ls9Z;;%enBTm)tbcyI4PQ@kzGQ`_1kXemkd>$ z)lp;Wvwm6?rU_=-@u~J7im8Ln#Ez2{r{M7ws1%90r4xoY_CRey!iyvgP*a6L~>a7Lv@s87APt|Z1S`;2qPbX z#$6Q`p`-`FkEXIYJ#WDggWmW?VR5Ubqoa3BPu2F6|n{~kaQ@Z zbF6wZY|}F%*K=eH%S>mDsNo41(PxM9UR!5_c zkCho@sO5!ELuOw|(dYnNps!Bc?04MYX20!P$ZX{5B0c)xy${p@YGMT{wP#V;ZyRxE zn!z`*gIHl2BOwF}q$@WIa<=(9aQ@0xxvV0BA;biMgqaFKzCM$1#3aOFd7;14xWHAZC> za?wIr6SAfg4?{ec1o~Y1q{vQgVSpYN{scP?M|UI(yTn~q0RP;3mbFSQhb_d6yi?o8 zpq+gJpFTgB$3>GFNGXCy5QAE$9vO+RV!z7A%$^4UGD#~>L|~p)MOaJvZ*%&Y;N%GU z${Xcc$3m;;@C#fW3CUg_siF0nJpfQ|NlYZ^bx;_!?2KzKEF!AnhS26yxKVH7Nk4~6 zNt~Vc8#3=D($-w1u*GQWotd)WM*$U_VXV0em~C#lOzvI z8aqQf8V9{PV`T|zAEOcMB{TPPQGsd)O@tw3W=1`^6(Z)rD7#-_GFIXO6~VX4TM#$U z{zd%V+dXLxP&yD%my74221(t7T+d$W6>6{wfq(zggy43GwW7we>~$7Etr)J0PB%?sXtV<#SVLE_~a;)XGyOw=m+yBfK6BEt(X zKwTkvikP5tdUsBxKiODKY;@Q?Tu%N3Luu_WEJ`S8a9Y9iHO_}FQS zV0KL1d^;3d++|N2+bu6d@r|Cj?toPs>U6l zPf$*qW9)$k#GX>6y8q+`V=!SPhTYKBn8{Ao{U;}NCS+%o~YYk zR66HR>0>`gW*XIwI0O5X9OMk>5wMSe48$d{LLk`*`s2nOHCGxwqX9uL@kPh>y*a2` z!9Wb<#%>e+kUHp2P=B0;#%>WXP(zH&ppw`*C!g#dy)sOuWhRX@B|_M!SmoM(bB{-o z`U_J>yTO|cwDJNZgw z;BY5`B1y4ADw`=%QYEQxC4Kg*Sj5@{$w{TQu3dLip!A#R<24BZQ9mFWzZa2sLO4U? zCFcZ@s@od!19NOJF{(7VfY={E*lw%@G=JM&GhXw$kE*h=x8Amy>&NT6578~Ink8TU z?n58vc0>Hg*9-e4zVR|a>W*rSSXkR$eEqKbLgIF7PW0qdF~4U?>*C*ih(C{|muVDM zhtdK`MLzte)nQ=%Y78Q8_fa}6ZFOi*LHvJa?yLe7m%Zbff_$Y5q*%1Eo64`Gu39>Q zbKpnFF*NF^6I31iT8Cx_0!REB3Ncl)D7r?P-$6+@Lp$*`AKJ${;_`H^KQeCO^qS8W z5}!S|_|t};Hi@ivcd^jdm3)1}E;tW727#qt+7@gbp=vqOY%CT5VzWhNgKf&9AB+igV zZ2!Zrp~JU_%FW`$9qaCp$VBBzcEAkRk~~k{-&VlV%^ugV#;~r|{-=04An5vAD_5aF zf*?R_ktqeZ_vnN7e|lfCK#|uj0&@@hUvOql;O)N}i}T`}%8-R$jq9o@R@8hX@Z}f- z?EiV>(4-zP}XlNKt8Jhl|EdLzTt;;#p}rhDlZq-Sp75$-FT@ ze1}!f4JN4cT>-htT9pM(GDxtfikb)-qVAy+F#z-@&PXJep(Qk#Y>p)Fy*WC%e7ELIlq?vs~E7`(VXGTQkq&zZKK+rA|F_J`OU9tT4jK=o(< zhWr6)B!-q1CFVIAS4$V2<`ez=*m9r4S(TfM2x&_uS|qlLEQPEhJw|{#T%BS*;2^iK zkmA*=_^0p8F(EpsW()8P!i=L-<6xINcR(9mJ?uh~>_cD*Gw`YK-vJ%1Kf5zORLIn% ztrX41ZcVje$BzWX?4&{OgH=cQUUSF zcKhu}w_=0wlr&n7g4pxmR4v`@)Pip1R!2&sXNrr0sE-VNRCt823y|ZSOGr;IZL1oQ z3;g>`BfYjY9P1U2L!DVl`F@?MjyXOhI^733?O8XOl$wm+l55ZXvY4@NpxRqf{S`D@ z=Kc2v?bnqiP#3&b;m3EWjYs92tzh4z!`$IU_ zGV&pj`g2VBg@=ZGJ-9v~5Y zdR({A{b|S8`SZuVuEVVRci47v%VZh2NrC9XaFdf94V|7_Y3NDl1WdbwVzx9hMzeHR z{R5fjCs*X8PQ=?juFej1!5H>I65xskYh(89JWwETV z<7ABUbI$dIf^4cz+A9b6-E0SYPJ31$yDi+vKCTM3*yV8|cT6(cQaVFjzPeos<;Xdv zr+!q74-k1bf(p)c>Q3M*%sO(8faQd!qi2lVSV_47c8O~M2F1mMI5eNFN2eFS-Ap4* z^;cY%3*GcIgn?wPj_OcKbkYK;=t@vC-6W#T9jsEl-iN4X$j%g6iAx)XY?)DBd39wZ zWmEi;LmP)OaM3JHAjl*QQ)x4bOisB{Y3`$ahe~&6-V*V78NV`4x(*yugsy#6m zJEbbLtlfxi-Nb`ZcH+%7{>t&)kDD#{*r`cX?{@}@jDX13x$#UZ`3^o8{?Q-LNh(b3 z#e`GXPkq|@KoAqU-^5jT0(Y~}6C#61oZ;5&Rz>&iD2^IhFL>$M{(}bes<3s@K8TKf zc`jvV&z3qf7tg8f2u7vT!X>zvO=5d4SXy?RV2m`k57QKBm6#FA=Pi&e#ZRfD@7a9n zp2%o_aDv25q`Uj^XsBv3<}oFXwGtYdU1~|D03KtpRx6jm%k_2nTfscaM8egD1~slK z0n4UM=BRp0SI8-Q?Uqfm|N6K8_(+NgvX~dZ2#1>vPQhyA8}57JMmG75iG2^hM^O~u zWojELWXAG+Os4i9i@)v^@w;Z-E_4rkDJ|+dPU6cFt^L$JtJFQITEQ5$Umn{IBQNJKt)dYG`RU2tj8S7qS-dNk7x#!o(lj#COjn*^M2?G?Ljv zP@E9f2|2bH{r^0a$K{{UnrfFNf9mr z%W>`+s{9l>ai}*-t&$tT1a=--SAOFZ7sJb{y3ohTSEOXigOS95s~0z!(i}+wIn1~& z;uH$;Pt{9F^+E9g+s*n^NL=4D4y+ioa2HX^%upP)V;@_Sxk~L>1>2aF2Xh*;72e1Q z61~#SmF*~MMF$XaE1HG62T3AJ^L6dV30KQfTsln+B5Eyf(Z<&&Pc#;K^BYwkKiv%s z>y;%RW(U)g%Q+J@baiL0Q+I$Ko^YyE>Lx-HYMfiPt7?)-Ns&hKPqMrzZL?86jF6mU z15_DqvvZVx3lMd(tL=W8>)uTCBek0X?NrW)c}VzD`5viROz+I@hSeuHfR!vM^vPS+ ztWiuB;XSh@@JjvXd)e5ywuhJMHA=%ipfv}f-y+e&fdg+9#u5A zT6g{ox_OKIpGWN|zM(>aigfU?3Ub8q;+ayuBPs?Hq3{!=0m@&HN5_ov{hTAa*<>mb z^Nu?9X6MTANbPsE78K(Ukt(!_z2TQKkHl+ed9t#KV5EWylKsx{#b1Z$2pfMz)~O{> z$Oo`j7y(WR7XId{;NV619}#hH?}4HuWhf-u#sF`F5EBPiFG764V9dV{tqU$EIV?8mh~idRs_Q8flc zPtt76?BI?VryhgEPK;ABmiz)9p%3=o%^=2MfYSHDMKTo(4V(ozzJ%wknO~YA^LKO) zjLsB3thMjkkaS?;EDxXY9y$m9Bt)s}mh5NRQEd>)lNgFLGKUY^OQY{}>&rB~qzOsR zIU0*T>RPqjU~o;v#eZACHrMjll4jH7qgx(Ohyao*`;fXaK4-F3~8r=ja{-sPDtqg@8ah zH^t^xB7yf|cJsw4v;bZDn%f5z(Yk!_>iLZFbX{Qb6oWr92i?s44qC;xjN;@&a5Ua& zDHO78_PGP9A__IDv**ycz#6R8ok$qlocE^6{Gxa_FD_!2J4up=XN~8XNhQ0rB5Ly8tJ;4RlKC!_)NZ`@&I~MiD-;G75<*h@(-Iz8`5DEmq7ER3D z`a$gFlTN{pHHEY8hIH}5bJZXSc*wS=vL{XdP!GE?vCtv1zYkyJ#7rHLBop+p#W@?h zQr!_;oGeCbTu2Y5Itx64M6Ht`WP)-w&^USS_u=ecreuh$304}Jk$M4<#Z}cLweXmJ zpXS=ElLEDs-@^;qC{125AwJ@W!_$pwV2NQ8^QHjD%Uj~3>8kntS{@rDt84KEhC^fA zGJmu?rk;D)A31QcQj5Cn5&$ikTk$NN8tiI?c`ly5evE%lp=w)yinUfu2En7iH8w;*nZ(uWMpwh)S@tG*bjf7^rs3O0QlbM zUeZV$oz!=3$rjE8zAl6ou|f>_;JO^1TYc>}+|lGqYIpG$3GOsJvEk~9P99Lx^L)QD zUffT_6x^TExFRUy*;7ZmyF=1fGx^IYtRdEzs413ylPLv1nBx3J6tEu6At_ZM-@2~bY9d3W)R-QNFv7z1Aku(zo}lLDQDVjLbU~fj zgf|ekh*QDXSkW_$yS^IMG`V-f-S&yb=85& zH*rC)P^WGeyl|*d30lPTNhPip;up8O31srPmnN(z@i&)x+9?(dS5?$YB(bu^VMFx8 zH&QM?0kZe=2r!m@{Yiy@2g{i8x>^Bh>_f(4$aF%bM7v%jILel32eA-8c+`f!Qxlwu zcU%8woY2)sT@cm9r20LP>PUo@*o)X19RHOj@9QnGy@yO+p+!>=$k?AZe*Qn}-K!~c zWG6yRCA8?Fc}>mGp6YN^>;Lq7j_Tk0zw_Nc{p5r9-u(b+A2o z`*w28c5Q=PY!@#2*RDVWst?X@9bx{24=v=s_S5gv8{6_Y7r*fPJpx4jc=`zvDf@ox zC9Vs9LBI3r4dkoJA19?7WYLYi{_cymlH||4Aep*0XbDU46&IhMh~L|*@4OveiXVOF z?MsXF)2R6;2j%Rot7?q0Lf?u{X8ZHu1k3t-4)<(ceY}5ZzARIP#dTLTi)y_IEqTcy z=i0p+@+*e?D>4v&08wpoJ*LUgYh2Lw1Afw4+s&1}`cRQivB|D}>2<&LV7r@y9NEvc z$Pq)~n=>J=V7Ul2 zg1{1Hi(&zP+50y&h~D$_d-Y-eZP!BgXrt+7c(STXI&(m7e#BZAO0Z`vF+}9Nd7K81 z&Eab2@f#Fk@A-lJ@U!8Qmm?tV=#)%rw3r0OYd{ajD!Df`P~FL+eD$&1)k^$Q5iC)2 zMnNnaXrzxoJqgkev*zOYvanvbGFonGNO{Yj&=+o$>i8s~pc2!%Q>~znq!V)SrvSNC zU_vhvbdeE%QzN}w{*WF|qCBjfsyV5Ss!LsK^hK=QVbAX3`M0D0%_C{^&RV}cULTa- z1&LXM#LpG+CeN{dy?ySMJb=S3p-)rsGl}ZV_X~l*RyXjw`0jSZcM~EkH#x!~gK^&* z9o+3Qar)&{Yc}FaP3J<%$cclEKVU+_bXi#NjSkv&Ir5JaEpmfyL{qf@Kc9#zY;UcOpRUNgYW*|*> z?!v15gjK)gQtD0v#JxZ7hl^*cz&GmM!YBEDJ^3dBGMw_;qm0E}kaatPET8%>#;!+E zhH2!g>P3YMP%KIeV=r91eyQe`#9N13Ymd_s8J3!Ea{}3J*b@3EsPn~-aRt87k=Ws$ z$(LilR=9ESb_iO8A5lzl=n6?K#WHSdTz8cj+nW~09q>U-E758bft?J`=z$30+2XQ{ z21wJ7X2(?tH5`=Q3Lhc*r|Dh_+IAQ9WsUlNC$K|P%9`DySR;Vzs^n;VZa2+feSZ69 zw^k3g=zeD|xa*|0rX1-+;>a9w{UKI#on>6A4*r_x(Yp{ae~2iRx997N=YzH;z?>7= zI?!V)AHcje82Bzce8IzhBBYnpCQ67)&^%?`PUtrv!pwf>rqW$fa|$ecTbXZk)VRZ< z(iOHE$~v{2mm-&8x0^8^HnjYzxcJ-9@!5QI9fofQz`SBODSRS#omA59kr#Ji?VfVN z&CYP=Ft3WGOSjzVaVzF%!eUk{xq+jvfsR&D&Px+=W^IiCZ_xLVQy&Zun%)9ZYV#7E{AiF^o8sF$Bb$MkYgUacAVjL%_$1)8DxHXG=T$)W+h>yKCu)IIf4cZ9;7LW_OV3K| z&w?Rn5K7U!C3Ub9Wp(f^w1hwr2c$S-6Qqc6=3ds}Noh6gWUlyOcZ??W9xQob`7Fmi zzy>0}ejaM!{5DAh1y_YO{l<3=})I<}FrE{f~U)3SB@EI1+7k zQx-A_a?C~lX&)L)mtWA2eQ@!o2W6%Gj#XQV#_^=~I*%ey{Zs;K9<}8C!+>ZVi!}2Y z^ePd=;wqy;alG=f@?SXn$N%$>Klxd_V#B5X$DjW3e@J;EvyEr7)Q8;ci{wVddlsLF zQWAWuJkXtT8L<|OMwO`DO6MjL5CBu$gXYp3fAoC(IejIks$O%I?duA^z#2+hwh$hF zP}Rwl5cyB4L?Ziv5NO-=Dri=koF&~X#2(E|fPiD{HDrcFV&PYqgmmH`L{-5EEHQ|$ zq|g%IL4U1wX9-9JSl}9@R{9R8*4KtjACw0d&}D-u5vJo*uPhq(E>c&Ynw~x^zpR+c z0mAvJa}DA_ej>fAkL4TZ)?fIkXKx2Jq3=Fy#+Bwy^=Ta<;rQm0(q4RI4>SDAwkcdu zrscPe1t?zOE@&e(L|>55IHAdY^yz!ymqC z7e9Od{rBGc!=tx<_S5$s{rrOu-nTia-}4!-Ouyx=>(8~^QefN9=XV~y^YGn_8fI4o zCTS7tx}fVOj^TlaZg7i}rhR~Ze?MII@z}|!vAZRA(;wz%0#+|({+z(BIyv9f+|3^V zu3H9}bc_>bWCx0%V+J3u*A)fq-RKV}acJhDgJVtomtt-AwynadgZqyU^k^xCL+{uh zmVR47>^swYHYc|nW?!%ScvfRnJx|oulXLx+J({_BzDz}74M-SEkPEssetTecf-1~S?g2aqfNBK zO&U-*Np?d8Mj#3eiWgd4{B;G1>hUzXL`Io<&9vMwWndmyulq&}=hc;5AXCpxyIVA> zS8YStZR%8WNMlqwk34bFD=`i2P#59}q5RB?=QX0N2>H)cHhkSl_tbq?^|Q~%l^=-m z#;%QP&Aj%1)zbl+eSSWiSYKJ)CU4ou&F($=;Jx?%>)-zP=!5s)zVA1lNio+??1ftk zqX^Lo9aLx`h?~wk+$&V6Z|5LCoP7xs>RAnid>_NB9VZQwQHwU)8NE9+wIRa~SjwVk zWb0uqIFq~bYiDJ~{?ul$+|LU3m1UjM_)@e z(vPh2!=COHER1%tT+v~G1B9HH{z&n+L(2>ln?naGnA|1C^X_b22&Zmc7wYJH%jVBR zJ4XR;pn0$MPvDCeJ5#z`*qZ8FZA{@|R}HK&djHU>x`(;gGgkI{?jo<0`0wUf3K54k zyBh@r@VTQHn=P13CAa1fa(Y-brg1OWxlgrCBr>!X<~Tc0`#5HIMEnm^8HrnBxAr(~z@XuZ7EHC+zdiJI zrQ_F%3ijsiln0SOGa;Z67AGxQ-jm3k2?;Fh{6vN2SySO7+oFqP!Y3aBT3~(Bc4(F_ zM+vF7AXdvy4P2rcRBCi872^hG&Ja> zw%@L`=4!j2f6*tWMYpWn)uyp>Jy-le7BdN@Jq>LHjbX33<7+`Z*TPA!y_lJQg>clK z@x>3ikgH_NU-nX5V?3K#ApjjzWPae#ya*eA{Ut5h5PapbCsc3c1-fl&_tmvPhWfK| zJ~6eVB6C9q($t94&(USqj%)Q6qm^1Sn7Q_>9nl(DhVlwNlihC{_hHx z)9W?UfPV-x&|q1Q%NpszR{1mF+mVPV{}auXQBw4y=NctC;OCEKfu7CgM$SRBq)M;R z?CAe&mriOr z(p9Jg)>o#wnDOkKOO9HpV_@QUsG>8})iP9J<~3(`eF-&?X|XYfJ1Y7G9XDy>p4cnC zQXO(fX2AuIU_RZXoRDWY9?qW9t~e=;sFg1+LUtknDQ*$px3U)Be|__k*BLjpq?FLX zZIv0{-xT`Ds(@;Sj6s@s6U$!Ba}GbC%p3!6`&iE58hJqU>K!>;{25SSdLsL)L1ul) zE18N^J<-QUb#-mKEu#TFve*!SVAv6u5sfP`3kaXhV1qrTNJp-((B|f+i?7Fi$QD*5 zuFu@l5%5Zxp8mH4R$A$h5s~C>{o>+T6Af%JgEFtRn51b-8(hmwgQm{3X^+m$7XSIj zv9rF7VO6G9dMIpQr2K&U51)2F6v_Mw4bmNqxS!>ELUDqK#jc+RB?|&tCiXFFp~nV< z;uu8CllMEfqF)0)any|pdT$n$YkE6|35{nvLqlNh`NPHE2h$^HgB`V0+aQm2YA(hn z?z9;Fe-&hYG*mUfPTjyNUFe|(ee@Z$o<*}jTCYI#mwwR#buWuoa$T4imm6A7easV3 zSB(L46Zc@4@BpNf&C4Cc0v3NGg2t*VlT(!!h^!q$hkyHAi1r!GF>@|w{`EbsWW*Ff z8AT>7WOYAEjVO8syDQ|{W{YN3mgs&1c+`4vX7j3=QCB4(aYuMha zEjtyCv!Xn$jM?JvP_QC$8k23=jssV=bP$k8@gpRqNV%go6Z9SfDaLXvC><9UfB6Ak zlCO1MkZo|BFQ%VItR2nM&%m5G^$CzcVL$i(XxHsftSZ(>yQ=gLf*_HLe_x)j2gf71 zJZ}oaiuh}&jdkvy(37Sd{igJoC0M`Reu?79T)w#AH;REPUEci;>3@1SBN0TOACo?N zLZxa8&E*xQB#Ps=YYBPS)4Q7xk^`^p7k^qj(^(>Wx+}Nh6WMtF7ipW&4AJSM4 zpUR%Nl`Ee~M{E1-c1L?0Djk}f_sx2wwSTeVBFu63H66XfA7GODI)7C;kixYxXdX@G z+SO%x!;h$TrG;S@m!NnyD?m@10~(iBg+XRhz5R=S_wif^;`?z8CK-bxmV|+da1*hS zIp6$x#11V_z@4pY{8QiBa7b!|iFTUQkTW1`(r0J&tm&y<`0eX_#YEIVG>G#Ovy)tV zgcchKbO(R0O2cJFT2-RxAgx41XD*~z3|*G0iyZ41nKvHo&2vsn`HPzGBxST%RGf)6 z@U2?0J0H4F#=*4veW3B7JayF1Ht7zD{PiZap>(INsXE*4IXfg+=v-`>N;z@g)8dEp zBKI-CS1R9NJM5iRswRy5T1e-9W9v~SWK54bVGQIWGuwp{YoKiC;d^xP=b>VTO=Q+d zg@=QUNP2L^nUgmnE;^iQdWZH?df4*N2`q0&P##qFsc#U*J4zgw%`M^GGJw= zyf`^+rJ5FENQyFmn}C{_hU^oGGdyn#bXn<$e#Wv=mvM>vVAO|3wupH&tC>fyME;40 za~UTE%VS#P>-KeiX`TMs__0q^1X!uP6hV$EM8Vs8{~G^+oaJeK`B9p@52OWUgGZ zsD3acFB9%==ZoJ)es1Mi9AIzYeM;T_swa5uGL51gwO>Ac;m@ZA8(b$Y8k0Onk10R< zmrUp+=FuHCcN#XT9w?hdonY5r&`*>;h9cDy;gcvcsr)?clNv>D?0u|cE3Pi)nP!lb z3q$sUi)U1Z=aqZJS+yLP6a*0_$?R3iNWv00cC5yFsMd8VWBu*e4*no>O=GG`i5B*c zI$gU0HzaYmPDNx5vhf3-!Dcd8+zDU*61;{7l3&aKn@U{b7q=Wx!P6*>Watx?cCZ52 z0s+5-BwN&k4xa(MF%;a)hkbN6p3Re~+{I8?qhJY=(WzlBR>h21;V-wQ z7>l-|aeMsq^~bM-p?>si5sSo~S@AHj4|;VmYrLc%^MG~R{*_pwJ2+9UY}4hcl{Wa> z93{Vy{-qngnXB8lzs)EA`v3jE|1J!^*^?(v@WZM?kFX(xxj02u?Y{t$jeaP(51v+7 zzOi1;;6bv^ti39yb|sVL7+hx3ZlAh5xlGV!q-4Ep3w?+p`dF^=`w-Hp@2jN`Fa4GK z%?V~V+@+)><+rb-3wPWbfhG|0SO@#M9Z_fN1O`@Mj}Yi$X1UjjfvG@ZP{{E?XVJ() zdpUKTT^>y-@j|(Z$JLorsJ7&kbJ1Ui7-4{LBLSVqnxDR&)E;}`))f@^Lk3PDAsiT7 zcO}AaFXMezjgC*7(TBi#09Zh$zo`VEEda@ts$usypm{8O5(%cN?g@%aoo%`f73Dtp zd;$fdnOtC%NJTpqtXU4-CTfWfe>)<^LNIg>|L~Kt80NES*M2_pG1%aAqhDYAedzDs zk_g}vjT)uZ`dQ((@px_pg1cY8WhK%6lLnueZtU^|C@qF!PrGzkk|7V2a;!~A2ditwai*l#_;B_cb~{yoEmRdngiWk@NN?is`K@dK!b)~677pPo3e5E1Yhw!g z8+B{Eu|)+{g~T4tJ^|1z$PZ)(q-d8WR6H3olex8r#T@`TV9g=;VHumLiACt?J0`3{ z{@oyGLT4IP=Sc6ga(p$1TB|rzJOt!Dy$Z|eauMjZ0g{*~yt0PN! z?2eFjuUwQ+hzPfyy1-%^oi#XbPh9hL`{2`}YcmBX_uhH$?YAjz^Y+_*ydKW}`@;v1 zAKssbX>qy*q~}9QG&+bu$xLqAWYUDaO}HY`4;)+&jghANU0yzqodb0nyvjRBW0>BS~^3PXZ&cl=d}r6Ki*>${_NgBk3G-j{AA-_s@XmLo>UR zV#B=%b3JZH{2~M7&x@`<@eh3N|F!t0ILFui{=`8!{{Gx@dQ~;YpF+27Js#E7LKrP; zALPit79iK@UzS(G3DwI_t^Wf{Y2^^S2_+?e)((MZKhcqtuA0(?+4*B<{Fdxf*VpTE zw&iyZ30?%g;YM%1r}cYj&3OVDk67TZ8l3b!+w_EHu^I^g2s5+%D z0owt#s*Y$-j=z+12Z~66fH5(}6qOzV$<$uL?DmtJ0o@Vpwv`Zu7H7)cU}mae-AcAv zAch6JaO}neL{cEGBFRCkOU7&JhPZ8C>QFC%R_}x2&~Y~Q#%C!Iz^AAVstUG0uukfi zv%mI$yO@g)Y#0+6=uiw$VX1~d16WB4;k^fb4 zbT(DTz;LpvaOyHyiJnzn$+5{=FUpWw7<@L<m}T#s*xwI#Qm9ZN1^WVsN#nGi+y(AgCcq(iAJ3P$NshWI0C}Ng#Wh zdst^`Ba?Kyw9-q(Y*u+gSKY~ICyh4xEQ1Dld|YvuFhuqK!1z0!J*prJFfn626#dS#fLSBSHPUS`g5vg(td#V}Q`m+RiG zjMijWCX^U!`X6XmqzSyiCC#=+XUJR*!1AD~u}Bh$cxb`Wh8`v&?+^$DN`;~TxSUL` zto*qyKM3t_>v1CU*+nBoQ);q*-- z8EHc(VY{(k>QYp=n@ICb(Chw>uqVpnA?MRHn2rRhJ;q_!$`YPH$A9?Rdc7;&z8dqu z>VAvUix2)Xjdap%pcEvizDN$I{0U;ufi!v{Ywt&<#~)-!rSFLG11kYLz1vWmCS@VW z5cKm%#69z?Zy`uOJ2?Vyi!UvzZee+fGHBf-EaLNVecz6qhPc5-K8O)UX7{Ba6D)_# zif~&s2?C_Fd4VtQ{MH~PgP`y)Ml^7hR6rdyo3OLc{6ZYcE_qqXN!m|=x@pJ`8+iCz zs-ygL>q(d-{yj8kFY`HiP;uq@C{^#Le+%<+<;WS=>z16kpKbyMa_+b{fQx^VfXaYx zm8q_QU&8<(oSc_kG1j^$>PZ12t@LP@1$Gz;D)R5HoS*DjD=q#|mtDto3}d-qt42!q zCu3DBPa&d3Y(G1qNT)w`iNCE(WU?6hzRJ#8I0g0#3%lIlcjc?`^@bniMO>=C=#CS` zY5FZvb`NJ4|2F%|Z;G>Dbj3G%sQ7*EbDxdNWKtqZU)60Nh*JIR-Y=?UF`vEj_M><2 z&j!em!oss5y;^Ji(%?t35esz9DHw(I z%&r~uVDb0!v{)AXiCn%?V_-n$KVKHo_26jGuZYXVQ0{YmM}yBZi9UIFIQv7Bb8sGQ z9DtL+z~I-uZ^7UNh<=pwhW{1(v1o&-e(!O`0N7;~>I*;{JCcb)j#S7@nFU>c2B~-; zNLinlXyinJ$5@vZM{LP{ZomNw%wW>{oQsGD6MU(zOXGc1>_W_vlPP5*q7{!bCpUq1Qy$qxSte7+x85Hj+7xSD6*7_ayn54 z)!j+aX9fhDhikD$Cl;FsJj+nsys7e;U--=no7Hb1Y-z>k;&zm@PTv}+n`9<|B?S#Jb(@7^3%H0U`6@yn+--~k;!l0^V zONU_3$ujauj5_kjsS^z#1h#x4*@K%Os)fwVpvj-N5%AK= zPW$M}3i9Y%Ve!|NrgBrMC0*1g7C4{+sANFv^;w4!G=PbI7%P9_eWJ~BS%7v$!IEZj zrZ55YQE_0+1z|8g)bP@zWZI`DXnlZDFk5t@)$RWhf>u4HD6&|LH}R~xf;%TftsEes zLzLRFm|36{K~~#Ncv5_rUz|tjfWcaTLauF727JbbO$X`_`B?v|kSdcHhp@?ZAz0hA z1Z4xS^ugPPO6GwYRU{|KmX=Cc5J0|QohF-e%V*7XI_u(ld<9Me8%#{Mi1Y!Ab@t?6 z1D)Uhl_C`5;qc&0r=jrwaGkLdq7X{fQ-%SkS~f~X#QdpW`(tKrsz!6%W(+c68JS>9 zBa6z<-kx8HWHSJw+Z-RvQlL*#JQOes-Y;@C-b9~ZoK z-O3Fw7PY>$0YT}Kg`c&qy~SS-8_!gkYFaePbzoibcjQZlkA3Eqa-OHORXb>vvpU}< zMumv0Yl7s|rJkP&*u;$*>K2n4H|DPoMN~-v1-ONJVHM2mw(3|VmTuuN&;n_aRNRui z=V@9onw0QFTU)G!{MHJ@P)qw9o=)>999E1Ixn3b9&$T=i+=y6WmFGqVW1mIIZc?c% zs+G-^wmKH}vFRnQJ0PPh`9G~FHzh7{r&LkYgBUl^{O2FXvQLmp`$%pPc^&m_cjTiE zBgIB!K+l8`d5GyS9l4%ePbKJ_;fC<5kT78Y3wAlY$OIkvt!m&Vjn~4T3@A{{!<+QO zm4vky>?tQW()suym31QtpwR?qOT$y*e!mizrub2|%a#3GW>TOUx$)MV-HDXz!Q->q zX(M6-t0Yx~LzV{*a3+5^GkJfiOAFQpDW~`-7j%XUVdZf#4ls)95^a^7n^VVNZ(whU zI0tR)l;os{dxVIKL%~IbVRydm08268;OxNI3rdm4Dz0)|)wmG92YfpwJ%zGbhJG=7 zdscKStk?#f6}BBho7hYl5YCU4_LtEn7(@N=mh1o~QGChk_y9_TNPCc1su^p);0bI} z0T#Ch9e_O?TinfMzVhht%c>CFL;gw3Z1NX^{%OD3&?zlUdIp`$6*e-8nqHD8Ehz~J zGy+St0tt-KA4$hJfVov~lnv^P_&+Z?lN2T4MfyLB-Vm=^>%Y*-4_a5q zfmCYCe?sKBXI;BmcWS7V(BolE-eDQ|(doE|O}r_rdjFA&=it`v!cq10p5yiflji_? zy#KoCb*I$pc&G2dKBJc-Ni}Dg$^_#eF+9Xnj|-jc)mGWhim&C4Y8y0kfuKm@*TiY1 zScFL}QS$aH6rbkC`aYLsjLPk(ebF0XNTiX@4M0>TZe(km=&}=u475nzOZ1!;4@Vl+ z4t>C0M(`D~(@Hz#p%NZA?umx}w4an1gqmi~+Kq_?X3*qWRaA8Lm$RxK6kR17Bs$|; z96$Y_t*Zs5&&jyLN7X(MIkn&Bok&eizX5ORoPyc#-{p9kNK78-Ry_GNf0P!TV?ER& z>}{srKCb8oHL}A20YO8^=8GS@RMe(SITozY(M1ZYfDw4ex215ds^;Q30iOgESEntU zMsG(TLPXpdF-kc&xz{bq$3<7v5564N*_uqnIQy+%0sg6(s@*$pZ*Z3}iTwFWqC4Z0 zOB*RMEYEAnKW7G54N{++zsRY<#D#Nqp&Tj(J-|?+_Sq5PRSMWhYprk%4^BH=b%X&# zw?*{tdl7Q=3qt7}8}jm(1>VifRqTz#6I$jC^xCZK>6|wk zw0>vK9~T#Y8}@;`xFPqdVA5i>KB6cY@BwL7$r^S5hZN!(wZJE`(Q*{5alA=L8WjUKl?N{W zTIz(kjj5)Fi{&Vvj37-G*otwHIJoJl=Pa)fD2;T!1HFcJIziOKr00a?hl5HLm=iTA zC2bZ_wwtl76b|TK)eKsnP_cZ>RuHj<_!xPTmG@(B1CBb(}@#Gi`bx z+S2K=9EBNTuQ>9cDXqd6We(|E6PZVtARa?DGZjJ4+pkhBs>pdjxyT|*>DZb6Xs&ZF zSzIW~iTHn5vyiJ_c9s8G!pM}pI-arLXGFKa+h8?9Vr2@(s}8;S#0Y(Za4{sg9jX|o zt{HnnM*5K4&F-PP+*TCMN5QT}Pu5>djk@%Gi)fEg$Me7L_X5c1sQj#t+KJr7x4HnL zCx5}`)BaxRH|a9~X7xnYofH>;n^yMRS+#U{I&=GIp%k1)&f(t@_p^iBRSw|N07%HxD{>XM#)y8ME-!5(@8 zj2p0mqG-STZ7s5+mLIcK#j?gulSK-O08wpTGOljiN&RD%k)18zP%8D$5V9RY4=fUp z(j28elr-2RipF9r+mSr+9tnf%0!Omc9bDOpw1bj@F9?NNwh`64ak)hG%8Xz{(Kb=P zh=fR1IwwYmi3hY=T!MsnC|PUOaiH9sKh6F3S?FV>sXgpS0!^RdxtUFLEkR*$r==-(CxO45*9Q!5p00=sX0%oo` zt-3%-VYJ#9TJSM&LbC#^!GAzErIWTJI8WfsiyBSMh;9nKGE|_Or52ukgvB5rYCuhl z;a1LVyaKAjpJ8i|a(jPJt;P0s2B8?lm3-QL>)+?}*aJiSW6YP1UmcK>tD4W}U1*K;Fm!8$=_y&P zHB*mU7U!)9A^qAEf+9{vrJ9dl5?2q&1Ixc?8p&UzjU5YKv7BB@fMn1Rs#rK$(|0T4-|E|Q7twCwib&K zsn%1rt`%-RiD2cbSg~4Es-}X; z!nxsujETo*RlDGrE|?@t66P}Z>bSR2gR+vXa-i$cTr-SgoJ#7k6^ey6r%-TKrMm+$o;Uh>p%v&ig<5uPGpjko z7Umc*|xt5CYVo))WP+nwz~59U z#!*71xxTtMajU8^eIwD+A&lVPhvGWM`EIohF6l03?T%blcb*_1venNSMn}Z(X+bB6 z1T3t0T`30#t=0q)+^_T{DjV(O!e5B<%(U|dJ;A--)n2P^Vxp$le!m2_3sZ4*QV$Ra z?Pc3`Oo_lCjb`c>ICi$-~#hayEMik%G8{v=b_4iN_GM>jmcDGQM(pd zMmF-(AXxd2bMuckT3uk>5qV3@%{FOraA~X;IaEOeCRzjlf?hS_2Cawun*di8veSCF zMS{2%LR^BfTg7xytVNzZx7>;#E~3V^>XehHD~Cv~EivvNUpd*Pk__j~=HqS3b8qY8)LM0s{r0$aXFO4a;5+u#MLu;VDWii670zZc!*fI*9OK zbH3t?lE*)MEKF@KbH!_x+FxF@v|_XZzNp6_E8K|~=Pr+g zy;NpzcpLoVsEsWNjKF!fI#Z`xbsc=EH=NLtM%qg3mAZ>(+8PN0RL4D)tZ^Et1A*+) z^Qd$rz6826*s-N{1Uzf}B&_?5Ie8_1RG5VE?4%r^U2%~4o&Y?3X!W7uA{Nwl9A-t` zc72qXJH{IV0mJ9GoJ}9exJD#8U1^nNXMpKvar@urR=@kGM-}sdBS+$;hAvH6bmg?Z zE%8HJm3~hb2@}B0iyB%D;@~+pB9)XHW#E^Ni&MW}_j;^q)P3ntHE*2FQ&-e0bc+mP z`|0G+lb6Ij2&a1$BEB3XB`kBnqlE2#eP zQXxOhhN`^yx0%ZB`7GhdlP99Teet{@zc!rO@?`b7*-3O*Y*$~^MW#IKo=i=4Roi;R zz56ZCpRWvN4mt|Uapx*VR}BL7XzIXN1Odd~zZ?b!?HTwuDf<|3C%d1}?^2kODD0Y; z5Ww6qZxUkqR#oIAL7?)@hHfI`Qa7m2n7{VX0;sYd_hsdb9TtEfbx9HzIW@ciQg z%>`zPirI+Rh6?Jr4PumE$cwQy>7GRh&BPJLP*a3J(LP2+F=82DYCF>tf9ZpI)&TsU z`toG##`U`RMr%g!ADOAbxltaqASpDFxF^m7lCBTlBe*Opo1GRFk#b^aW1k4tISMrm zdap_zJ;+`VLRqbP(4r&Pe8_pDLLUj78-(+-Yqi{Wx!vWw(I6$O#3fa<&y@*0otl2C zRGG_TLXv$?V^0-_dCn&sKv2X3H;I=sOCwFS2Un4gZ``4p2rm2>QH=;5X}vXZ$_2Z} ztZ!&kXNEMrh{P2^PL@({Q$8kgun36LGMyGN^tbbNfn&)dw3Bu}uM^rwA1$ATO%#PP zJ^;$Ei`6y&g?>WfmKR*>9^@)ltU48hta67~RjOtRMCMtwg0>uq4 zha0d5Uu!Xqiu>MA{QQdMtkqd}ppTlz+9k`m=&@U$H$!ozjtS<(F9jFSu&v^N=BX5&Ki;gjs~1RczjUq+&hhtC@Tz7%9oe*vJUh zGLw(BM;FgEj@{;vp`Mb0#8m@HdyhGLFvp0VllH!~g!BXE0%@j??4)miA1|RR50RV` z$N(KDT%yXJb9`>cIq>*W!_sN%jg7q^ECGcQ*}Hfuy1audq2C1Rwx=NTr05uHBi@k7 zB>izMNr)g)_|~gtrh0)gTity7rtp{*(57hO}&whD~i^adRYkR>#MC z*eY*cLVSfUMv6k0ploBHFkuSi#KlJsl$6e#dk_bEF>1pjuWhj0A3kZ*>as;zseU`!%GoyxN*U*3gK~}MA5o- z=qr$sDNW==YPQtLdkJA|bc4O;ZZGE~ zV(k0MfYwE$vqz|L+UyD$;9W=5s55F|1Fc^T*er{Y8- zwuFNe3&}gHtAY$|ymQE>lGc2#+o3Z(6#!w1F{uAZe_A)!U}WN-39zQJj{KuizWk|E z7rAnD0U^%CD#w_KCo!@TWtdUqlJ$Hu2)c{7@&t(EKYTp;#gw+zH^c+{rm*aa)rxKL zC{1H+L+%x53Rk87L$@U6^)bRS0oIS1MP9iolh#V6n6Nm+eMZn~lkG+kI^`Br0|%+0 zCYc0W{vb4$s9YicD49`^Qxb6{M6GiX17!0L^sUS1Z`?!(x>Z>bzYkqJlTBahaCy}0 zCnc^LglP?9cOC`KbG3&jVQm8f@!Ci?nWo199$nW$t(BgO&(W952{@nVicJ*tFzf3i z<_YKs1jQ=qBN4E(wz;f@!|41JTg}ZO)2NNvc~sv|Ur@cAY~3DlAg85X{vleCo(DU) zBThM5n`c^B2e{qM3b~|g9YZwLgHzsUlwB&IO1#{M=-I6a`cN!cjf0Fw(C_pcBU`mT z`dtWE1|QV+QxH22k#E8!!n6zKoLF}Qc$}h*r~-#XhW^WHRm^Aq(g8s8MYUd!U6iz5 z;Y_Z_Muo!Lh>n+510&R;m%3}fnYKrDwNwi9aRp&=a#;T~MVjKfdsNKq4N)F-O8w;S z$oxXzH;(Ou8#Sr@Z`^<0HVic|4J><5d9zJ?ZygJQ7|y7SZf}w+tf{na+ku~(U~G77 z+2hOKP9&~ItpC!AYpyZPJDbYRkUv54H2+bV^Ok);(7DZe`H%ZBIAoFPWtd2r3RF^& z+J|?;l`B9XQHf2$CaMpBHYBd$?UT0i`857wG)R)y5i3_G8Jd1q7$SXm`flU)7?}G`~mQCnl_p9nU9h(BIYvR>x5{Y z00igOH9di%VdH|uTT=CPX8H!nlV_*GTiX3;LR?J2I`>@If53Gi1#-fP@&RCPqAbEF z5g!5QJfJg?8nOfDaQNNUM|PAv2|5JRl6+#z`eQwu6MV3iP+!Cjx*=r9H}t#?vMp-d z867X^Xugb{lo$F@?dEBGRHVm#Eruj^%L)=4*+Z|`Qv%yS;Gg~q67qZzk_B^puGmo{sKHv8Dbhekxzu89koIR8=$G<>@fVO6PCOfvl(RlKwz z3tf_i_M(oamc2ZcMU~?qnajj#RpN#{6tu2UK`cl`b}490d80`QU_Lvp&J=hYs}!MQ zzHWQQJ(E80VW_=bh#zq?ZEAmkFp_}c9|15jo48hH7GPq)9l7yE+n?DwM6I0@zXPXBTlS42gOb}AzdCdwBQ7_D&%A`8c z@c;-KW^XtrCLu#ix?zdwW)9d`Q-v4=1}f zO1>%g+O*9BY}kM|!*vn1v(?U*_Jjr<8|xOfgb3JD6KQa%hEL~)qATb2qklF>{?mpq zkr!FQvV&)0F|lq3wY6#f^N(XG6{hCcKi(S`NL&HCy+*BBl^F-^3FMqOR4qms)HSm~ zvzhFfC4%Y-Lhh%AOgAB?G12jyvac9DhmQXQ+u_a@{(qH}qh_soF}Qim!34H!Z1BV9 z@~ESMaGqjq<`F~+^L8_xKZFPLEoXDD`A}<$~i$p0n%^{uuO$kOs>rTqttj~ zGE51_Eh#X@msIl^*DK8}9WeR#2(1 zj09btUw)%U1`#rRZctgrQ+FYSk``rhg%X+Xn{u*6P?eunn_}tz4ZV8}k8MU` z^SO9l>;pk}^9mr_AHnD1>uO{kV=4$E!1-fTfR$j^71~XuZfP-c6o(e-L*bmp+Eylt z`Xgt4z8BB^zH{+xi2&Ah1DmNquRq(Y?%_Wj{7{8r!;rSV_`4{1YX?XD+4fBNa zlIvjv%h80bQqbzl zIjjP?$Ccy?j54R&MlgOe1(ySVD_2!j4s5Y2opQ(K@b!|$ZqYP6h)jXapQPex8fx#@ zP1;4!#CEACj<|C90M_LV5I+u`1{{vK5Rp9a*RO&t==>A_!RR}eDj8EuhJGqiHj1?5 z;Vh-4(~f*{JPI*~VkTE(<8$6UltyltO37{+_!gpVlOe|Z9EVozl@w+mT7nQEX4T=e zQlzfD&B>TZKIP8leB9NTCm!+4h{H1NW+ixNogDd$j~G5;?e{AFu>VDRUF@_WMkHnj zszU$9fUB=Hky;CUG}&E-t^ie4Ov~PwbMM+gkd1dpwMr9Dv)yl=^vU%1fn`zEWGvFt zy)Z945pwqX53e9T9}3zb&JLjOs1zuQyl|kl6P>-Is2rja%~kK&W5(eEab#Hs@j!L z>WW6uGrb#w*>Y2koy@u*a&9t%4h_zBlwK$n%`l&MK5GNj$7CvP)%J9`=PxbVWkbU7 zZ7GrGvB@}GkmQ#oNCU{=Ta_%&8WiOWf%0PDttKY!2`HLny4NU4|H2@5_aLUOt5!v} zrfF$JFw@YP^sah|xGSFyrd1&{)tAK)6gd2@r}#pA=|Wy{-LmzGQ^l_<3GGX^N2s&+ z=3pV%_CBd!`mrZ}4`&}WCMR7EoX+q|<(**HT#OxnJggmEPu<)-{sC=`A&^IvX1E7U z5`yw6eyGQdAEep6(kJcpZY~eB;xp+RD zuPLvEZeM8EMn>88IHRrs1K@%9F#G$v8FIxlBgyo z?LPV+&xF<&y!>24FxLUnrlK>0vTA^FT9HphhLGYaS(x)A$o9{xUE*JAAF+0$j}r+> zJf?_5FLSm840&Wk;GNG3Z5(FxXvL*KJ zXFfg@#kqB@DJ!=-5=w;xjZpj8U+r>q_XVJFMec+CHuQT-KMz){?im*ksMR~A<*Ay-9RC2o3aw24lhh#UbVpmAE3Z$_Wz){c zIAyPacba)Ec|uY;+(WRf#<)0HS&2gWjs;Rz2(YLr z?`K9qu#$^4;yJxwk(-es6zW@i-G6v};x?{n&ZeUZ+DQh1V`88CL7qwW*clp_XF54N ziw=ffQW5q)0#sxAVk;*}7N6$6SI8|g44Kpl<^g(5!ft3L221Y^A^#1ytY3%0>c^CY z`Hu1_E72MY3K5L7xJVB9KyI3^PQ)aq(oIYANr;}&SLih@+LAQn=&qFr8If+rj>}w2 zbBISl^a&5AMV@n!8Ty9D#hR_`+$iHku}0J>;IKq4FJI!B`;N^- zanqnK8*C{1Bc4i#CY{UON8z&SU^x%BFhUCPq8ahBMD+c_k{mpXrWev ze#TY{WgkYQ#Vx5jeI~B(FDh&9J_F1&Cnh3SY?Vz@HxMA2meP%_h;sOyXp!^Uli;L^%;nrK(p;B&jeqMb{N_HTcml38lMaRge(Q%>>_{ z@?7cNN(4v+c;CW|x4Gh6v_W|6;FY|nFxvrKJDk=sPD#JOk5K41ZwjpyarM^D?9lly z%#si$g{nlJfmZ=#5v_|8a{_fKa5hfrw>ihria7a{-INv{St(Kd_p&g|+8+qm#d;?O zR8reIe5DQXP@*&+ROV5*e71@}6i$kYk?{l{&fV7dw@zY9A_p8J~_NR@CG zt!kcRcApb#TQ^d5m(3^|-};YhJ=HRnAhp2|oV$7>32KK*TGtNlHiup@d!ULGdi{aY{)F(^yTkF!f{oxIpG3 z3YF-aNi{$*;A){4HELXcioIK3@zTcHH@+e zj^z0}PwGs6=$LYNL2Cplv({XYx#fPu)XSBV(&o66f?$EjLIgcDN5-33%e}#LfjLE@Y8WGt=w`Pm^0Kwe_2y?2AAf4kEE>hk z1mo>46~hjHs7>oW8GDPFi87X~Coz1!JI$N3Oe&5sv(M&7V5Ro1J;L4rI{HwVm`>Ea z%xnnTbD|T3PY7!0`{djG4{*n6_o`aa$Z0U#+M>f=o-4ZfZIrc!#=rR?lJ9P;I@Zg} zi|05WBsYw;1M&=mWG(k3En;EarQlSDB6!x>m)VH8zX zu~ePk22#~s8q&s%-c6B^hd+l{iezlT$$8>$(`Azxm?&Cq_6lY1@@sdJ9Y~NChx6-# zA(}KBu>ZP;vs9Y3mL?u#$Q?yRi?Tgq$>?i(>}rWU=l(!Rb6I@J6fwVufdL&AJ<~Tb zJ&=zMG92mpz_27mehQavNe&Ym(YZ87#lX^_rlv0P<_Esl!r2?Jef{z48f<55%*BT3 zs;#7b?f0Wl{moqaSl2}lM9EYv5y5+=8UNvBp=&DZyKasj6h+_<3kf8!!vm&*W0Ib? zjnsKrghzZ;sLTwz{Hc=K$tbShQzXEOheZVjw{iRuY_`j9wa26#X9A-|gHoslY$B&> zojS?wvmF@|L3cSEhDuIb_X3@+odqsK@!-%UYtz?P#t};bB8n>=?!Yga;BxRG>6D;> z!6-&BFLkxT)b!C&sM(Yt&Ef^49LZ0n(#>C%80c%7r2u3&o*h1*F-Q)arS@t_KcD$s z-NX~!FiWJ8Z$BIAQvg2b^?7jn`j^ZU4#02n`(iPYR})TB^l3#$_q44?30$U{5-G$+ z0$zb?mJl{TzimLh4jjqe9baO|A^4nlPwIpZ8baivLq%UM&YD1TuqHTAGI_fZt-~Wc8V{qA+}2$kCVb5_X39y|#))xt zF`YX2E?T=t=PqA_?YS|8&3!~EGBreFHpwO$0&h;8d3MUQNSr%CEH_w*aTMB$zaXDY zFnoQ?ETWV5go&q|=765`v#U+{wo}pb9~j*nRb^#wy{)f(y|7pMq3Ckw%3q-;SWpn5 zKW~PUi)XzEXutHV{A{&8Df+6v6eND0va|p3rw=FKuIrNr8`$Bf*8l039@W41fA_n8 z`pF0Hzy01%{67&_{L@d$v*Oy(^uPC{Ddjic-u7$$15b-{AIyjMj;k|Q#&;k49q02x zE}~t_H@)-oZC}N|d))_)+F@u{*L}j-wQhU+t?Bi=H65N`bybOfF8%)>x3zrDqn~~7 zu735#>+k+-`|Ce{wDtA(-h1cOUVs1HT1QcV4}Qze0{(x%U+p`vfF8F>B-*y1-iiZx#c*Oi+zn?O&R=R0y(!PoRX%uM zZ)&E!>?mV(-Hmb_<*$$&mYdpv?#y+IO?1FZ4ly^RyCF^vW7VpjD!6ZDu-^^wu7Fni5T@m7pFEcURWJX~P$xFr_w)yDp{s-v$y(4VB9 z1U^$6wZC&sTJXw$HemLfDpmA4=x_9Ke|L;iSHY^JIfE#fjCr29)J42HRZ>_GH=xdnusB&VsPM zs#^qLT&;5v(ZaetIWN0nB#QYi5Zlp0{4~`GoHWTzL=wvF8wiuTKx`+0*hGj@cfnN0 zGvQa?1pqrLQJ2wEIGh`5-MzSY7I3U%Uo7409rkylzB%fjHH)I`V*INDc|HKfsotfc zwnINpU;I}5FTL)B1&lK@eWJ;36q z48-vF3&$X9Rdjb@)eaY(xa_JL%*9_qxmXZFQz5!*OwI2it(`<#X<$n%-IcDDcc=Vo z5BLxh3BvULu0bs@k1h>nMSkxJO6uJMc>O)c&*u%$7-XwUcNRAqjlJ$-s~zPNX)91C zd$QZFk>RNo&1BC{FxYpY)y_gIAL=$`(Uo-V^t+KbAHuk(h8H91hdIJ4QO1Ar5H1+z?)WpJvk*t`NhoSGn zJD}o#o72yuQ{R=YKX+l(4+3Nb_`+0uHAgH3K5;)AyCYCB=QFkB@FDh6%J##>pV2az zM{4}Utm7`k+EH$qjypB8hiWy6xC|hn(tdXl*FGXHct>13|Nq&0nss)yglW}f zmR&?cB=JEL#()O&2nrzi2vF3_1{ReWnH7!5h-7@Es<@(7&$Q<5jbz40vl(@ZW}3xl zF*5E@;tvsj$@n?`gZC zviJWdv6;u}=1CK>Ug9Z?S)_{wMiKcdcX)i@HG2d|=34m!_S$n#uIJF&G-n8{7&e+mIFNVVO7V$Lpx1zNLMZj^`I0z2zMK4W<;6hU`RRCSE2?Aru!5*{J~t@UzasgMp``}T^)ohoYjrUMg4NP`PY78!up~zJrE!% z>y?S5)WcfdRaV=|S7zbGPZ##h2lhDpkL)WHc2MGrrullEw_ksuS~2C~ul|B^Hg&#s z&+)6TepW2?n!ft#t1p}RgYUlm&UfGY>cLyz`|kH2y!+mJ@7PMxU-StTWAxX2=WcDD z{VVkC^S95x`wB`!hYG|owC74_7m_w^FEsa!oVK@Me#OG^1-b@z<6+(WIwSbg;@s@r zPQ;$%zgt(Ym9%(VmsNH1qz1tw%eQ!4cBqK3F=<1(S5kVMH70Jj`yCJQJLrAAgu!to z8DI_TV^_Yq08^;ppO0eD=WSP{^8~eC^=(DqDqXHN&C(+ISK$$Jc~ML@(3KwP*+o^ZA~F5&1AT5o*Q%1IdNPGkB9~FD6pLCjdyaA` z#eG!33?$}>pVOb`TK#m_=fT9ai<S*pli2ryIW=vfeZMwr4Fq;5i<88mU{yF8n=^A^%EfOa&qO9jb4_*fK6 z4Z@p=fTxc`NU7X?@ml79>Rnw+0TnEOK4fNL5l8W^%g5A8C~(Ivje%Z2)s+`vMpmO{ zWV$eo->aUHni2>!82Kz``r2VOCd(Ht11#lnZRvsG{@hl)eey2Wg#>ho$6xWR%2%Kw z3?8FV>a)UNk)jFSG{PedX3#AjAod~a%2h2=qam*jYzVd1mZ1{dSXFb7aRc`g_>cp= zuW@wZgJ+kp3y1h(LsPZ^Z(cWE>r};8&$FM@Dp!ujB)G|3P!~j}_cJQh^BLOr7foq` zn8>o+pU2KFW^(C|SAyZ-i^3g}b!VUR*lX0qLbnVzRUVL)g>BiI5Re_of=f%2?^&qD zQ={BdAws(@y17>c-Q2O;>$!ysR5SqzvPhX%)ClLbmFC6aZYDN+t6$Br=pb0^mW4hZ zeMMaPa>NE*IVNf9)<1w7oHaThhR%*H#7>Q2yp2LU!Q_5aTy|xH$Ek_hN_R~er4UQE za7yFyO&uW<5NX9N{(Zf z;+HWZ?iXt^`*O!)yfVLZ z=hMe-ufqgH%kyQ{yKjEs^5<2NeO}g!r!U&u2s;nnd*_`q2GIju=4bAS&T)CaKmt^+ zTsFPnrAlZ1SN`(9a4ApGU%%{Szx(|&xBd{GA>S+L@n}X*0Sv63MKfH8Ee`W6P1r=P z+vjtj$+Q~u?I^&`%I?i=x5Lx|ej_d%x3%s<9(U}i$_!cLv)!Gs3m|_dSS1Te(&*Xh zzTes(g1or8ENcf>svWnbI_$$Th!o4`l+hgfUL&2bGoM9r5h6gadG^ik(TNB5w{pK% z2CMnWzxl(sIKbU=JF4zfCA;=o-9u}x;)_yJ8ab}w`7C#5?F4bJ%K5t(FuRQwfUCrY zHIt{UNTmKHbsshx5JxX4lIuh!p|={S_b<3xoa#dDfzKav-6({0KZB<$_|^E zIR^L?NOH{L%9Voakfw$t%BM^9Ai0w!PVOvV{$+9z?6S7KG6lW8cSlE`LWaOw-y3LZ zd4ZXk`@YMC%KEar(6_kEt1krw;qvp2mTKm{Rjn9N%5RExuH})tnmIm`HG1sxxKy$W z+)}LWjTj0I>x1(25@+CzZ`No zgC$vX%f`h*v2I)Y%=*!=@-{~Ltw@0!2G{gO)G$){{9q#+FrZIN(h!KCdM+;lTXnIh zS;3kHgJ$(y;w7HaCu+LqF$xz=fv=-?FB0o1vZ-5bI_JX(ta+9I{sH#dEti7rqeEfd zHm7Y|vegZpW>0R-!QjILkpzSa%ifO>*UPr4z3itvJlU;$fim>08C|-_I@28@$Ih}p zBL%k*ng>p=NSn07Spn`aFP~Z4;=0b)3cUl=6a9U+#y`tfd3UJ>U_TdMFs${GHO!}< zemVvI&a)q#-+zcC7I2vCho86if1Iz^Lw1ij>)Q|Bdh0AI*S$}nUNYWOTovn$+KI`j z6TmftUHET6DocHXo?o?CA^xby>+GYZ=U&OKvn>iD#+hNm({Mp+SR7gJXH{X*)rjpa z9u^JymSPeqV5Fjz%&b7tfd1uLoCMDtl&A@Qv_4XxZ8_taWE zULdqB>gA6$rMs}d@V!4j9Bln81IaKo-54AOzz$InwQ^4XF7tzHKg+6>~ zQ?<>;7h)Skl*>tPDjPHRVW)m)w6lB~Lq&x)BD zuiDkPg*6(HF<|A`MU;V0c;N1Q>o(%PE{_nGd%;IZQ*vDcvS=r_2PJ72m%FoUi_Cjj z^4~aZ$uXNFRx`t#!tnm^M9#9o&?$bfvKFLljoP1**w<)w&h>ESsfjn^Qy`isAf%_M zUmgHi_&(Iu$h}uJb6Yz*mb7}3^W9QsS!{)w>&7YfD5XL`=rqx;&GpI^H4Dj#L!*jP zirPfbQ#=5a9V7^s`M~M}C3_sbJ^6ymJw=_*&hS%5>waL=aQ2 zK^I2d#Y%b7TS(#zu=s$xD?&ovHrX#l1n)AsE-iT5Q~my ziC^$D98f$<-SX~pw8bSC*yI)NyUVxnRWFC#EV4P1mD=I`NHw8_kEGm?(|FRx=m=eK z*gjgke=&gnnV`Mr+_=>j8&44((%Nu*q|r7ihl3Y_LPxK@kuT-=JRXu-K7C-_$^}og zRh%d4?mYs<^p*^l&Ps{svnffK5^r@k`BQs-ncw_dUF<}j4tpH$LqkTI7wYz#>fXrN zmWt&ikwOdZf(b-n7T|t9?AT%WL%09R*_3=Vu1c%2i#tZu==_V5aII;(xQEl-1}PN2 z#w4f^q_r1Tz^y8I1wnIF%yz8n-AiIGnXeR!Xf7TVijQcUf_)%s?`qH3Fnsy#MZL-e z0SIPy9F;|fZ9a?o%D#VvO1)X+{)5C_xby7iwNm=~UI-Et4O51!B5^(V0Yfj%1N}I1 zFn2);YYviy*I&e)8OEBUS`Dk>>$H>5Mbt1UW9057=x$1b!B+~>Qb0QC4okNNY|SIF zHqT#gDzmj&)s-v5MC6dHSh+o)=WThOMJyL?mZ7XzftGE#@?LTu)(arhKh4{=aoH1! z%=`H9BKvs2ub!gU$lKiS5wFtl2s`b?x<$n={H04?z{ONbo-FAve=wsn9oRNef`S}R z$t-Be5(maV^15z%bt~S_h>*4H0*A>Gb{#Wz>3`~5CSII^6iyjA??+ul8Ruw=Y7hWW zyS}Ji-8x^eYA-7EJL3-U(HD<-th)0;aSpa2oATAru;;`LZ}+m^u#GUzVO|ar+u?95 zU*?)L+*+XP6#2l^kkqu5#SVAL^Sq9HQw^$Fa=++0!VgYe=81$F#2ked)W58H1(oIq zr((PlI8NSRQoX|OHn3Yy5RGHntmJxCmjz>n)un(hpGC-aLGT(!ryvTotP>yyGOeIs z709VIX{{2%N4qBO7Y8~3;*BL9*lq~bs8--#+6tL1Z}G24UA<_nv5J@ZM~OH@H)C5& zs4uUIr@Fm?!Ze=>I6Uv7em`SxO-y)MNy;HxBNcHWsFNYE0QobpMu)%N6wTUzd>_Ab zyrmOVSSK3DZ9!yIOR~@MwsVEc7v+ZR=pp;0yQ~M7M$jA=q-cOu0*APe+zX!Po~Ghg zphvR*Tgn!Cc$v4GvOZLE`Q{(pwh~b5qx|C9#oL#AnD^d(>#cXs1jTVj%YZzx14*dk ziDV9}1VSj-%;+CEny`1sv&c5CI~oN1qtflBWSQ&|6e#8~3Ckr#a zGwCYqjcB{^C^2u?S@tOBrAahm8aDDab^*gZomSSV9A<_8H2z?k05d|lsf9Da?6d6? z;2N*e*?NU0NvFB70(CL(ggE!V<39#{MUz>ipu8`Oe7#08QW5EeS3Lh6g->9&mcEkv zb&__F@(OnQuI@80+1hZ=4F`lmMYWs9ojfe?5le6TK;TEy2g)*Oin3cj`?fgZ0|kfrT-c2^_0^V zp33rtfw5_wM-)M+tSksy?fSo;$?-SpgV>b9nqLjI&1!jowA1FnX9%pmQ4ybd2v#m( zolD**e?{swU8`+*^nJ5G&MCV|6$<|Nn_=4;Q2&ax*^98-!-Eb8jn1Hq!>MGYLX2$Y zl5=>}4S2p~MxHZZqtcTkWJ92(R@Uw+Z(VX+_E9|@h7hK#>dr$mZ9x2bmtPOM%VyHf zN8?#i9rm5#Grb+x;@XXhqqe7e4Ygp{!`cYYqsF5w$Vj=N7#C!Ged8icuaQc+nGzhi z+arpLOS0!)H+G@HC_=;BDLbDO^hPzRM(puXYjKAU=U0Qf$-IB)>o&+ttQ2y;+Gg*88!Za{R`m6z zyh@ytqvxumu2@Q-i)Fbj79r+Ibr z?_7_a>NN}deDdK5{-WO=5aW9;rRPmp)j5?PLjtjIJ0J8|FGM6a)Q6aC(ZKek$nFUd z)%}@Sgp|7rbn9M&MN7RYesM-rNL-?AX~>)lf4Cky$Hr>XE5@KA1i9WG8$s?d10iB1S{T?*fBN-5g)QnM;-7x~&z?QN<+&(E zSH}*-B|kviJ>Y{?T9exW(sf6y^sE;MGWY>F(y^QBx&xDE{F^u;12i$dK6h1EF+IB$ zkzx>ZjtZQAWxX0~iu_(TGPt$PbcVZTKd@{DcX%(r@aL_KO+w@R{n(|1VXoU!87Vm4 zfr*rB0-&taDzAY;E^naoR=n|LuO*iUaFteMw1q*nFPgba^Xfdn9lPB)gXTQPAvDsu z(eYbI2Vb}&jB)Na4}=SRf*Lg|$k)@^j@r+uOqiC>(YZb%CNDhfsEfKkTiHX3nZ+qg zbpH4zndM4RWIxGi{)x-}n2?RAS{6rog8ob{q1fg2@fRi5$mh}Fg#za0Npt@~uthn| z_EI{R&9wnW0-(EX7gJAPHMxIg3c*ELd)|2OX9uOu#JrLc_HO=hb-e*Dap~?tqp&`+ zxQ;w)9qn>)u$$Acsnb4Q3p1%I-<0BSVDzrIm>$nDb}SsW?p%ao5}rfYBQkXvm1A+B z<1LI1BgM#dAQ0Qi&`<7c%$U_Yo&6zE>9X!TasGC;7Q4>wmJN7X7}Lj}Q*v0V!*6SV z6zD1&8-JU(rS1Xl>^gqhp~F4;gz-dZm;n?W+a@A7`6zT3DNZ24x-nC=tq}5M04=nO9uuwUonAb=ua#Fqe+5^(+0qh6y`e=Z9mo9 zFIByxlBu|>7?KIw`a*h?Y7;&tl~nM$c+8p-FSqf3^Hx5Hi|DRyosxgk=7W;bOz7r` zZYvV0j&cM*+=Yxk&o`oq%FL7`C*6QD*RUn|Wd?4AjQB-o@T5~nis>l}GcCZLU(@Yq zr!~6U$qMb6WQSeo3QZbtpb;qHpCXfQH27(84yYwdm$Dz=uB5yJ%9;>K5@~?6%Ffy5(4b1T_7Z<^-&K*% zj+jm`5~);PA!AAN!Aas2H0Jsib(EC1rEb6LL3bfQsO1yMC1ED zXY)dg)Vu!W(3CS3-#}hQUYxtMH(A;99C|%HM776J-v~v9uYVYa|V9;9{U5 zkspuO@>N^T8}wzn9Bp%9ffid~W}qS{gB-HuA8N-qm(pT`#^okf+YqHAvtFbKBP=j{UXNumPu zuOhUsbuAfE8wma|x9BVZo;NM$BqiCkBG|wpBM}OfJn<0_Wo?tW#n9_K0#+AhADMrM z3l=PM(Ub*Y(j%@cRtd0H~gzYBmA zYtk;R0JZCI#HJ}1-H5&DBG2cXI1LhbPem{flVz0Xbfz-#nc1vO+D!x6cO-*t!97`a z+>HooGpdBD2+U)O!YboXUb#fwTj*LxjAaR^tgR6|%HFhmr%6B7EhWC^ zz026V-Rg+Np6sRv(?G9QelOt7zTtH?%i`H#_g?M(0lK~y%~d0%E%EjdbQvwD?A{(+ z)%f@#)o2j4p!F_)L_Bp_i?UQ@WP73Hyv~~X!ZIDpgdje&y}TBwta_%okxUz09}L3E zyNHHAYcTZS>(Yxd71mY|*Z~85&Fur@hhCj%mPnt(PgF(J%f+OBB!I}44Ro1)0WMOP znU2zBo8f|qIe)Jq7Dqoh0vAe>yWh*)*9xqM0w)$p6nqRv5Xrf^P zNeQ7;2&186Jq_7~K@mlZXA&ed%#d&Ce|V}!h&oF;ie4D}vT4g-Nw3WhQqe*KRr}4a z^>^S|aB`&WF*UJEj*Q7*imP`@+VAtV)H{BA=(quQN74egSlhs`h#>?BB2{x|NKOmM z*WmiPcq5J^si0Rrd^MQTkv(gxA?{V2iSzuFK(seo5h#+le7vaL3Qu{vqH{ltSRSDw zFM4JQU5S}2ju?Rtu2cM?UcNor^y|?M`6F;Qr$|v)H#fMOzXh#rVOq;NfVN;h5><#0&f%iz}i*5Ms7@xO}+3C@NJGi+C6_9TJAmkz5AH zc*aws)3J8No5uDifWckH>_@$sczt>QlU~NHkmuHnOzJYl$Lpa= zj@Xst)HNc|Klaa39Sgswb%h${Z^wrUSH>||6sihE6gzvs)}zzxDH>p`hVnk61lnsp zF^_z{RNq7ragwr1GW<9?9!-H2^l?X~ZZcXe6har6B2=~Xe2IZ*Z{E(05Iztj&@nmU z{=l{*dGh876cQfGKbH#j0(F4Q?#XnhjM|eTfqLOn8m#Ld7r`8gO>YV`=;1zL+cd z=Wl)oPz9scOfmtZEgGeRgnj!Aa@p|8C70;ue5II+q`{YkUw@s^pOvP<;^M}6JQzz{aNIK6xbg5NN z(ayhV9sx_8`F(HhEePs$v&R3KE;Bv2bB_P0=FSg`m3x*4(C+%w#oI=4GF=;0P}Sj| zdB!51We?u_?mK7lFlrawZvKU1%r{RSx!*?><8Dy7Z>=D`b{D6)A1}hB<>Y>wz`u-N zBXX8&v+Ov}K1CbYYZlok4UJm$IR$$Ubonkg_tCqwhluQu!ExgL&2R71R)lklcBRYR zto6=e7HoLG@vV4zP zkM_1h$rab-v`UfzI?B~60BAGWv*0Pn{um{3W-5fqvs##vg1xxEi1jOHpr{$+HPHp4 zN>FCTmYTx`{qa%fO+=l>$^hNK?6IJ|?a@K75A}YxWs_<}%nMBnYNkSxjp=C!+R&r~ zW-<;TN4aB_3ze84QduG~EO1ZA{XQ8l(qxFmh!VP}04K?JOFBm0uDyIKIm6)vb)3zU>{;Tiuj!uMp{|XkxMP>&aZTxmHKBQQ4Gjp^hipG?%+qOP z9b~2BYZASMUK&1|WXCF%6Wrd+)_IRTgIDo_a+CTbq7W|Wy`elf@5Z4-XhEaa?wBh# zUhguJ>BdBc{0g%-h!wlBEmX7np4MwGFy{EuK*Y)-{Bt!8Jb}kH!@{)OrtZR{hf2^NXhUY!7=I_lxsR2)1FemR&d&_cL+>N8!+;DXm@;eXY3^)1N4xjCs3C)=o_CA``~Q z8-or{=B%QOw;;AR(yceG1_2(BB}VV;K#i*mRe*lPRw$EWdD)pH@w9aparXF^P+7OI zLclBEYUUV8_#*eI)pmjIC8I>2f|BC43#?Q;6e2ZV0RKDYk`?l>b|O|LNp6s$xBIEy z5AiM&Swu5)(aUh3M2xf+MSMiPAN$D|uTkmw_>%*F4~`$%*<;{Te|G`m>6WOd%^nD+ zv77CIwcPKNsZqJcn|~K!k2R~P*6KT7ZaurxboaO7E%DU*4pF=|I55OZV(hV_X5RbO zVFyJ}$wp`5qDvP6?Gm9=()PRDU>(DY_`%|7rKcpI?a|M;8i9Iv3W4`xz1KxQX&&vb z9_(N4b|3P1h|y>rYl${~q1JklaJVOnj_}c$AG^<&bfHj0+{7)!9tuPScUwCdeOZYd z?<5=bRtHF=yiD?rz0}C`Y2u1Tx`|06SVq`JCPkJ~S@av320}L+zIt_`7R;RpyStkx z5y8x;ysJzRuGOm^jI_w4=f^y1Y(Tv0yD;s8($d<&^1;HNmQ7szk>8W)z;CS3LP;9}O!>YLyG0QUhsTw#w`qYIkgF6MLF_gXDpxSs&zqtunE!pa8bp(}Rm zTNV1=ngw)09MyM{d3}lzwlu&iX|)rnAa0TUA)b}B_3YP{g`mq3$Lme#s@SA_M+Bx6 z<@YCJ)C51afY9()$&w+k*k%-SQaLR=%5v+NK;N&3UaOpCy9@d`;3f2;sQ=C z8aUd_5+f1c43_WuNA>5$LEC?aKZI_3S&I(R)cAYMQ`0<7SwO0bysNHdXygm=;tzrY zK2tdAEy{~g8Rnd3|U24>_n+3K7 zPYq03FPA0T7*QB3VjG=Xz&@>PJ0W#--~85)K7?*uF0BnatK6jRFISUxwHSTospBzs zamCOsK<}xS*Ro?gLRA%%y%TK zY8vCEiNZFfIcnN!b6Ud!!mhDH0Im;JUv8uk#65Lq*YoQl7W}amX=Fbq7VSJeQk-^h zGMIsQwWzoqJc?4@2{{ZD+}*WqHc#pL>Q+EX%Et2Q?%p2BONP|rb<3s?G*w2U8A)mUKf3nT9hahBpegALDwwqsG4i(A%60Z(67h-7&(FX4?Kgk0E?7{j7rd0ky~sUDg=B_EC(Rh=(te4W$UJb;3G0Bl z#D)pgQI$h!1B*UWbU|e;hxCh_E(cjYz6)SgxMm^N8_NN$%W&kPh&1SJxXgF~hd*~- zk9v$MWXAPB#dI}X9VkG#i2i%0sU7^?*|vQn!C zK?^Zn(H1Td8(NvSkRFfc-9=uqkxGl`1{G6P?{9wZ@@Mg&#psuLgTnT^t>gB8y%@ax zX=?m0QWJ=CzLW*Y6d!|BM=%C1jW#5F+<5G9>J+JiuhNj3t95aq1YM0HpLCb?P}lj% zXu2QT2UzB7tR;2h#)X6X3hePC`%D>Lssxn?&)h*W!U~ z2*ym?!|u5Z!k^8%9h7)?oFL_`U3-FJ3x%|lw5~`w+KWb zS7v_<;%nRMuzBIQW-K7;C*eX;Gs}#E(&hYZsS$T!5VT~jScB{cAkWWh z&alTcs9NUpl<5N=WbJ7~oD|?7vodBf!4YR7EVe1c3_M5arM_0u0ov8P3sZ*xOjc@E zj)`5Sam^4YXHt1Am-$?%X!uhq-sAPR(MQzjb0ON@JYKajQ395xX>#|oJtfbmQk*xJ zYCkM<&K<@!##pIpnpC-qU$UreMibXTvZ%X%WnK1Z&{TJ8+({%?qA?(8she_d=wu>B zqjR`fd8L%DbG1T+fG~0w6@so9;}}`Y7~xkDU)y+bM?g~FoLw)&j5)kQJDc}4HDYlf zXlrlFF*OK$s3?GC#rk^0?3zkHXy-3&dgpCXnX`x5pAd6I54P)%rGd1=WfUn!y?xAO z4tAt@He_itqDu>_C5N&kAx8&DjP+>(#9j6SdRVCK>B!~zaW4pf406oEK!FT#NY
5%Y+}3;|%FPu3KP7Gt$0o!@5lFOBeaF&x*3j>sYT1z|ZJ^KRN(8I8Wt_oy+(_(zJq6|#n{e20+?AnZ?|T8*QJN2{751=> z$tKQB{6XRy^@(yYq@+%3K-Gz{Bt}j$_*Ji4uIbQn8~TK zn1{s}znpMQwJ0rIr5eDoQ}A$ z<_|j~Q@dJwoThib9OE6hMzr^JXLjhP8uDrs0n66b*KL_Ek|&k1{0s`}rAa(k_HqR1 z!ShQPwz0B4bw@^#{pdXV1=G3I?2@0<*@rC#3bOvP$UY?8-)BEA+@b!7EA`Xi{twjud zohBMs7!JbZ20e);*18-Q7xS`ZZ!hPZutFo^xs*0e%QfdmpoX4j9}d2CUG^9$o8R(B zEP93qyk(Nulciyy%JbE{wcC(P>-|xL~8xa#fe68A&u}~qa2!$D~s43V9A z-55n2`1@Qqp!o~Nlk^bGK7Z%??*{%!;G2+SaUj*n=P6E&XjD+qVHUZ@Di13D7Ni}j ze61ff`o4&iC@ClCF-JQx-*Lm+BWY3P0s+U>Uj-?(e2C^fc^`Fpop1CK8$rlyLzYEB4woE^btl zehd3BG6I_H$w~J#$PIfPjf}3-<#(Y(d5STfaPlKrRA1Eyyp&& z8h-M0zrefrtj(36ph2~JXdDI*Pc3|<>0cN`RH=No*j6a*@zarm&Ofdjq2o{>qk}lABkhakFzFv-nvYj>;xcW zW*M}@k+tF(mI1Kjols(mv<`t=?2mi$Sy1ztEy`^4J$YJHxE}s*0Dq3|>sq&e3 zaw*!S28KI_AKfzPFV0vqV^zk)$u(U9AQr(|JtQO|G6bf0Rqe>NM8l(8ju%2y@bt{o z1m%g9TqLia2sl9z=6UdiSxXn)SSTw-KzN-|{$}NA%G<_DA|H05P{Nz$cGFtmTCP9y z_>-YmTbc`L-{ahGMI?y3R6MygQbeMsY9&wJRb6U8FrH4cu1hlvBTPO2<8KDFn!jbb z$di7}$j0}!#8D>YBb%c{XjLfh$-?B+x%TdRsEwQU@VvvlGESbqgli%-pbNIvMWBFr zUmNx|hvhQ#H9aFra)4S_MQ?(u`6Ayax&w+O83kS&^#H~PFLy_d9=Ct$(wrQVz@)P5 z3Kn`wj1BLY-yVmK#9Yth5hDve?Je6TFj1>wxKcSQ>m)a~y6c&dUI2;!>@8bSS=y-B z63psAx^CI`5rKXCNp5!i%MnN?;G4mBUh5Fw^zKFyRO#%;Cb+h&I8!Xx(qvE;+nkzh z20BJ!y=Xc8Qx4C%wfo^e{raD0_y+rcRbh(U`hxo`?lrj@furP=Z>xvN1`OzkUAQ2e zyBfN@?fg7%D+^xp6_zi;sK%KtG$IL<=h};}7Dk9)dC@i$N%4Mm{A%&#j^r>_-f^m`!qyGy_rJ zGQ%Z)3;ZE0LS1$HGAb=3QfOQFPUmS(u9#>}HcoACWeE2JAu$VTy-IeDNZEk=CCM=n)Y zqY;|0xFnuALw8;GmvDi?4J8NjlMB>2B2eqLmWZ}SvO->Bx5jL4H>^pttVNkV<>OFN zfFz3HBPHyT!tsh-Gjg>Nbv(u$RqzN7!T9N(0SUe$oZPQY^Ce^s9PJ}Sfy{){G=)o9?@2rOek*LWb^ z6b9s<@oc~H<6}_enVROWAFJy*Lgub(l1%337e2KRR5F}=N%J}oT3oW)xaH;Z%*cN_ zS&}D8z^tc>X@8kr|FNs9b+qc(Oe#znvH)(i8jgmNkw7+cGZ4{kLvUkI^1BYp_(nsg z6!ucW-k7OSg309o&?~*qz>G@-OqLcBW{%jbJ;R_J@9>`?TFGwl(suIb3B#NW|z} zi9X`bcJsvlR+OtnKk;dMT~d;fD#GZ|rwlhWXO3L0%V*sIbR{h@Wm8G}BTyH+#_+;g zd#D#((_Uy3Re65a6&W_tT*CXGtQEOJI0Lw@E?XRrhMW(fvxQoAGn-(Dt9ass(%@GDtw?$(>+k5P@m>YGq6pED+FLdX=$Q=~iNFRk;D= z75(d^i?q)mGPH?wWN-ipxwB_G@t)pwyC80Zfm)0< zChXAD-IQT3c7zO5${yPk=SZTxN~hDhKs@$1u=Mmp{{#P9EoMtn?o}w1-I=NebAef~ z%5Ysqm7vg~$otp`hp8hi%I;Bv^g(P7wPP#HQ!$j4EM~;K7zyRr_&s!VVx`xhNl9EX zneX#+(mW43O9cO1B{I-WwpZeO9}OC~-5|{)ts=H)a^vtM!^XY;r)AT(+2^IJP8} z?oQ;AUhS{T0Xv#S2PHA~D5B00yaLR1LCiRdAihJDqav})UEZ^0m|T$t18PC5Ga|^% zq82cYoGW{WEe?4@6cfj@ZbGY3Nka+5-h5Uupp-Y5SKSvH?5A5Q8K~H3u-v#{jtxgD z35h9fzFJ$@bMxXKpro*nXV5c3_8@{C{)GA-$7@tSOm!lLh zo>B313Nm;#OVGKMnYtc_BpT%_Tb3+pym8)8m-yxQjT%}x!A7&)BAWQN=B_8Tg%Q3r zSW%|SH!^FE;E=l)Xg~O@DT8&YN`7&SO{3>C2fq*92PpQ9S)T|kLbL=mij>ak9Y|P zMy685#zh;q97Vau?SM;nVZUlr5ilQI`8o}+tWK#?dji7!s?FDH@l=oTaA`Olc?>r7 zJnI1$=O<7JOY60WsWFES7-7TeLNg6gs+A?)KU7-vrws+IDa_>EO@15_Raa6l1 zSG5F(ln)#*zqN!1(IOK~e1P+1RV2&P&FF4H*r=!|NpRV8R#EfC9_>02P2+3l*(X%o zzInnC4wOtYs!}w=23WUIf;pGf0YRC`FN*2MqA;YtD&@WBbcVE2nhht_EGF(5PD#2E zt6U7V!x#ZTs8KH_=;ezAw`VJF1X6bu>4MpM5lLnVQJRk0tyEZLC#?t>upzrhdU*s> z1@fyKJn+2Et7|aKCnCsc5rfg8YLlg7L-^^@YvcQVk4TdhA=(AQ_L#Uu4W$QX)0FsJV{%@D4k{Uz5HENdgwNkbdc^ztSPb>L`YX93u|iT z1i95H{aqiY3G>2I)({3>T4~^1zKyvG_IdC#+R+4h3 z$~hasS-#p2=w!f&rKXM-OBcz;__8}*GF`ABNLGG7j8McKI8cI6UJI-c;eSbQJ9rBWg$+09Wv8eQc9{xsdfNIVPF-L?4Ul%N&0dZnV=+Ac?HQ%n^3JN<*G3IuI&V# zxp~s8iu&epSNH+(a&0?i?kB|p!l{*z4oG(#TO6)rQ2ASm?suT}07A-07V@XjbA_C} z5oIQQQ#Fjw4dEASb0+t$FvvNlDTbIrWS&;z7|h31{)MYnOCt!>=y|))=3ak|vq`h1 za>tTrv@xHAAXpO#(T?kmJuo~4M@l);mCi&!p-qk`jI+pH(WM}XhBRk>DGywVaPNE? zL=%?6t){!h;7>BU8?<9d+epMmprrvmi087nG%Kc17UF~H;t@vau+9Z&5uARg0%y`a zs}%`%VvHiKESY}a`P8VX(q?JJ)f_yebQ2(HKc0|<6PvZ9{fI$;Xq)gPVZWm($x{*? zZ#d#TSxN30nKbi=5rAjiP+T?A?)HbYZFlhDUgKE*B{3D?}`Z- znI=-SCdDwyN(Ys9a5KqB+D#{NaKlxq!sbW${Ojz$HE!_*(d3h~Il#vItXY+F@a}#A z{Hb1LuBIX(?qx_N8$^&ZZ>Fi#`7v!=K<>8C zA+4fftV8Y#vYY0uCRNzJ#=*)ebEq?s$E*Hv)G~N7$LCv5^SgEa2nkPGP~OEK7nl&7 zbag<)sO;BdA4#$%AeUP~k0G7Jz zN>LET2Ym>;fXB*rH?3;@Sk;+T}bdFZDQM_?$2Sq2pV0+o44& zbr-}-Sn~jbaOIv#&MV(gCr-Jp$GU-yD5Q$WEi3yjko&!+CRmKkx~xy40)9}4s2e!m zJiZGNO^QyQwz8sGTd4+QnT;!Mw+~FC&TCc4XgaF12x$_{;C^O$b^;gsm_zv$qbA~L z5hAd#iWY-c>2aH(TR(MpBthw3#^Bm$tTN!pF1QYB-XzK=HuZf!0+}kB{xlz|>}RD2 zGcs&$kv~wU%N0L2|8kO8@g-(*)k@wa4+#UrU;gRWzj6Qh-We3gCJrq+`tPS6#%nev z9%vL9w~frUE}S%DQO*fWMK2IhH&fLFw6BdK{dsp2t~%z9El#0 z0<38E;a2+Y!nDnQ3T6WZkI8{_*K;A#*)~$jgqjUB;=L|6IeeG*^*wYxr$nKi5jCc0 z`F~)eH?@uf3CaPw%c5MZi`i&k-Re~g${=x?nnpC%pZ`afuZc`&wrCrQeeu!ory~6> z5>A~pje2$o61iV^~ycM(EP2a^)-_dsue9h)nj!_Q~vFa%zDvsvYRh0iYsPr zJwK`qRU|F^#oSGV1lp1=z^aK@soWwO{;ATkFZh2OA@%Ejy4Us4kBjzdzXV$0A6+Ng0C-_UyR zuAt4?3doU~AZeaEl2?r6T)e}y2+mV2BH0Fh7*?VyYk7;ToIpgv)nz|A{|qK=E`_d7 zk$?WM`Fj_avyYqX%S#U3{(aeBX1{RzE17%hgZIAwcI+b?Bt2p|=dxaUCaFLKZL?8l zyU08NI5;)LzxjRkBU!4hZUSWO5~*+gkofKbp-gle^Mz#4zQio}9>gb=;Y0g;JXW$T z4LE|I9z{G+4AEjkNw$(?G!hXjs4TN!>Tdq9M+-C(MV@2@($2s6cgYYa)bO~wzb)E} zyh;rNiZ`9DGT+@W(27jP=s-~y$y8lGAY)>1NpC>0f6%(@Jp0kG!2bMb=qsdGCkPmy zT*00kN&gp{qL^Q%ixTg>a|Rr~soV-M{)3Ud-7_M}m78w8hhG$(z&XGvDp{`5Yvj0j z*>HLx2=h$TZ6+k`&?YUW8QK`*Rv4TqTUS*2SbcUW($AWd8($1;0rg*-&q+HDugrNkKp2U@>=^T!Wv6ST$H!%4 zo6(^^yAV5tk^VE*tSmsa%5^`R6ibME4caRpQAap2q`9PO#Og!^?c1wPSvdQ+RB$E; zp(3CEawridx?DLsQCc#J2igKBuA3IE)ogth;d0&($0x~Q0$~fMRhP-T`*D9!R07wb zlZ1UXn|yl^aMxR>1;L3?p@uIaw@NRabt~;S+3<=H&0PBO%b_Xb6h;jgjF^(Ub7Nhy zpb+mL)pBqLPixX@0w!auC9#3exY@QX>2?Rp)(rxtM6~j}+hg{Uxc}Hl}ot%eYgcKr=7^e3m$F?T!=G6R9QX_zCSJ z$k1VZsoXwsM|w><0xx$xX?h4W5^8gtGol05tWXg0>=Dn9K$zstnAt#P7d)z~rtQq- zEAsrF$mtQ`yy}CoV2(`=EeY7eWTLRM&V{O6G4mX$=jgyo7ny$ssOhw0(0p0rChp;9y_fl}qZ6lO1 zvMO=>9ARW8)%o+mm#ERfe<{?G2Vs$|gGjG`cS2yf_apZgmHtP6{YCW)_vioqum0k_ z@Bihyf8qYwUvJzZU0mf){haRSKCKt>lW*<&G53bg@@q6S>@}3Oi}310_Z&aZ18Q-4&)|LzWbLIZ~u&LzNJoxT|xAj+# zzyH0zd}r_Xzx&Qxd%yqA_x8X4```Wk-tWKr;QP@v+qLy_v8})89~L<>e|>N+_3+Ee zziBT2Z(sc){$P6^=lmmA06}_w`U+jJrwxfPC-ir@0L)*bLaL?}gPPnW4?=2U{n|pi9z5Q!r z369aXO@{7ZLRUP(l4d;#O+`eiQYIW1_8c~fqiB)=-)KKN3L zkU{>^|pe zVCwc}HN41b`0H0SA~^68*ngFy!TkeW>Wi;V876$n`ShJoC&>SMLxK~Q0uRYZ8eVP5 zzW5E>zrbJorr-RdLcMpj9C*#|@57P4k#8punyQ5gYHG5aiMp#L!ku~yuYMAK_l7J7g9skuY$Xpir=Y+{Stf5JF;{UJ+_-gqtno^v|1L7@;eWN{m8*m_CFm&?xo>~g_Zua_S_r?lsx3T803 z{9u0so8Z9Z3h=tWPc5V0WSB=U6LcfKNjHyjvwsSD+}yZt73bYhR#n^~Tkzw}>v^%q zy8TUxx&J}DJmL24r=uTqgGr*(;{Za6WxpeD^CtN`)E@mbW|%h1WjQZpkm+9Ctl=M{ zVrNTtdP-4vHq)W&kn-qbqW3R1xYxoTif-cC@+J*E%5(hN5KUv5oo(dGWU&@$>D*iu z#ugR;zH9?31mGnb-ejvsd2+V|SXkG%PsJ?7<&q0*zK(F__yLWO&Zk7;1Mn{rXVKz0 z%XwpQ4VhT6#MXvylIWx`EhhUTt%&TNg!Z#HdGxXFci8Q27xaa97vJZO77NfJ$cq;8 zo76f9){wY2AIm7b$&il(@J%x$f%A;|5-GdQ#GHE$y$n%a`9;EW`%s=85}) z)Artpy`w&e)<18Of?utL{bw2PrGG=o?i ztkjEaWN)#gT4K($>J939)CUyHM5%R8E&*^hGU|z57s)B|_n|n|b!Eg}5bq|4C+bsv zlgWNNNecehgp7wIvw3&Db{n`YwaQs<+*eZM#F^<+R)prG_>U-E97p4WKVYvtR~K~O zH;*Yk^OAql-_K*+IsJRj94~xniPM+);I|iYqO`MwXAVw#ZG?y_poB3~?4pxvrlBB+ z@KJu8A~aBD%r83jzLb$*mH+W|b6@hVd_WnZe3%331qdO=HKtkyPm8L-gmh;P>cVZ` zL#DX<5BofOc$xE)$~k0GA01~~=wo@$YrD;YEyirp7}`+|on>BQ^z80FX_b=NV?GQH zwp+Z#)ny6y7VlK{`aR#s;jR){OFZgLxovt%V3~5&Sb`+zRlUegJ&bFOhzREOLM^b( zhKlm{R0*RIbm!YHuiI0}esBsSpb*NKc~o{QS-^ML0+ckXo^EUP=6=3UBO#{pwl>v& zkSB*q2nr(U{Q#lqUAXXAQ?A>9@H=~-k0DBUTJ_SO)LC=Ef5(=K!&9M>gUd^Db^!+S{rlL5Gi)Ovv+#S=cWnWc%1&%|@_AVoZ4maJx6O4vT2eD{Wu%Kl zQ7`zS|7b|PsRz!r=I3w(hjD-WAx*w=Y4_A_v&G3yH&A8zMWY-v2FrT&m-^W2VXa6+ zwXHlD5MKOrVc&dUE5iTCz6e=TvhgynSMHCf$RuOsQ)~(@n&#_u-hTasDn^!zzxoSe ztaZM2tL>|=epW2?vcLN3t1p}RgYUlm&i5XC_28}VefRqh-hJ;q6JxYr^a(FQf6aG} z9TNBNjJMCtO2GjWoXf z5NjvewVj0$AED?935n7Up6qS8f{bll1_z)#Fs|HgeFX1KBX-az&E7lIvf+gh;Lgn; z2e1t9lJWpxK%c*Ed-J3U$Sr>|sxubu(rQiF{0~i{v;0`fltKE}W|hl>H?MFMq&cHz z=0E4^NB{58kPk15PV#y7F}+%NuJ-wTjki12Z2SuD+v3X>4v6>D8?bQ^i=U3q4df(2 zDo`c6&u}m?oMA3Yvg_s0j|NeB&tn)FP>kD0?z;H|`Xvb~x*-OD^3m)gvWO|)sT8CrMWHjQKiiE_1qTJ`_oX-h;2r zqjDiI%fe23@e`DGjsK=3*YP*Nm6Y6peJ)GMI{0LWQmwiCgaZzdqpb@&lr9Ii$1ImF z*MvP`c&G>9Y?Nq)ls24OW8(`8O-xSIs%&cs=VwpNM-F5VeTxk4Ar__JVl%ZXcEJW( z1);j}CXhmqj$hcqO_E3IsAfS9f+ti}I@7C6*c`+Ud9bLgNgfK1EXq0s$2-sd`;gZ@ z&q#V+rpgV1-Q9w4y)1O8K9Mbe>1YKh@0WWLb4%wWBShM~sqm)vu~1jo9y7mW#Yq;< zGPI<}JpQ1zm*Uu3?6w_sLlXMpqvUtRQU(L=g5$x4DG1EYve8%2Q!sbBqUH$8Mzh ztp=H)FqONBX|1|K&efPMf}>`>ta1TUksn;7`zqi=+mX>+V$@;XTo;s$n&+E7VbGhs zinjR6Ez?Ngu8m;3zZpPhgB(@%e#=*Hdq+fP6J zwD{Anf8+k^g4cPLZ_l&(JiB>(ekRew+=vP1EX}EBAs8%Xf>AT!%L<1>S(vAM@>S{7dp>y=Fr%t)jjCWNue7M65EG|#qnflT8il_u|JJD*#L-idBOUmb!JHTZ0 zv&+W`A#s9bKAKqSj5^>*x-BcVCs~m5RM( z-qW@9f;yVA3!f_=x-Rs2-I5S5*lan}Xq(~qb0O#2{a_)@t<)#MXXUn)o;mE+5B?Bu z3w$+_J6TD@72Mz7x?@&EribjuK$@z|eL~!!dw=)0Oo#q%Up7>T@h&-E+Oib{(CrUb z2@geC5oKyhJ7etS#3zm0|Nf+b@2(5(AvC#|uBc(MQcKokz%kthcdN2j9#rA3OZu+` z?qjzp<~<;{Y1u10rcb}Vb~A232#RBrEp909iQV{|W3k$VZOr9NSKUzfBSe4B8#0G`s+(2srW zt9lxg`FVcxyQgu|54y(GER=a3+y2?Q=wejpJo}_Azs`Qxw6#l=ksH6~a$^@9)OtNy zTF4-!`&@V;vn^Q$0rxkxDsp$(-SMqEe&-}lxWB!!Q`5bca@TK&nYW&2owtn;u(|D$ zB_yOqY$X-4o3;C30zR`Y$22ox%mv8!ex^PA@s|6!Oa%dnMb9cQ^*sLblC<4HkI?Yz?&F|*Sd`N0-H-ly1-*VJT zl*B-3ky*~b<8-%4h6#%H=3fS5EV!k#D%xV`U_+J1l~J)=7Gw7}9_j1cEgF}KSLpA$ zg*0y}dE8i36=xJksxaZJDQG!kNB<&nw;~b|H+}8AU%13e0Oz4DMMXF{Q>nYg)bBbW zIStSn3MA>AyH8vJt#o%%;H+#3l#Z=MfoRz15GTHtZI0Zyg{4Q*Haf-Hk?3F}Ru^QN zFF02-@T+wrG$1Ku^ex@oMdx*%WcuKlw`WmsC`U%ZYQ;6WvI6xNt5^xSTL@7HZesyS z@q8|UQb!GWKM4@G_$9PrL%;w~mT&aU_!{vHQC0qAU)BR(YOnjtwTkh{8SwPUtpnbK z_o+GH_VtVx)eg!h=NTNH`cK`eDf5LC$SyedjVv3gz^yM@7lS{oxZAF?oEvT7_2H0J zh$NhE<1qF1Eq1&C%>>??NgFz|`D&)6CtovblD72`o;1}w<`CoELoSo>VD1=$sxwkv zQ7_BdPyM7lv*yw-6tyL8KA27VS$hgC4bo zwEpo_NT!pZDd3q}lg0CoLV+5n$&$k^IOs0H`8@krY09%bjnORt3jBr~Wkk)u3MRz$ zx@OB6bd9E#Mbe}6l|Dhzcza7k`0;=KLzgf9^Y_^E~@ez6Pp? z>;I@NP`K9Fy|>?b@ZB@FLG$Xm^AtA3fp%`fdyo-zK{=}fVvL6xaIFZd%$LiO6JI`X zOw+vd38(3*MZ?MiqM_Fr+-10@g`7d0Lu55ZSBa^ZyHAxuY(1m1++^Dns@JM>wVn3Qt4P-(i7pA)Vn7yKIx@R7NDL4pq!>y(Z_a5V8?~t+4n}|8baYuMz-6fWe zg(_hL$-Ib#9CUedV@Jf!2vMzkd@;`Wak}e54bcfRbx|Z6;-86Rk?3gX6bK&DGgXo% zkArepH;;8rPntFB90FeKPKR%f^hI>m1pFLosJIv>=Ul6S9pTx1b6b?|eXYj8_`z`y z>`^YQDC>8aNYfp}!(0R>HZ#$d+-Z1-)(iQ|>!DgHVe=u)IG_`TWdaFVq}Sc^r=iCJ zSb4TX5KYe}F5zUVVKe>nRs+@H=mg1LUhb~z`K9~xkt|l|Cf-6p*^!Dse{=Af5<&+u zAN4NkpKgl5o!E$bc+;}M%x^vAPmg&mM9STHlZytQd+---Ltz8VarL9TDQ-pgWuP-Y z-R9u%EThr=PW7x)e@e_SA*W0_#gzVIMrR)x)(k)@Cxsc^RN&?pYINm=Syii}HlYr@ zYI;{D-7y^qx9{6LxF}g!-G*0Bnd=u<_(b81OI(Suk6TzpfsocJgj6#$+4#FJLV{$n zu|0~3dX;oMa8fsA8v`&FNVQfo*`>^PaW#|*7lD6LHN;&h`0D5P%iX!7mm;bN*7h8; zndcp0e9Wv#QWF7Mg`ZW7W`+nu$tD49qb57KV83>C^SHBh9zCjt!d5M%PM~66DRP){ z*(*7bi`2A17U6#ErAO(x=l~&c9*6=XD{RRhh&6)H zV{-9BAP@H(N+HMst>CeQ5VQd&Ok03bUUyK6<2>I>|yUcI?O|OUP05NkyZB0iu|16{? z)+i833!Ot3!)-_`yBL$~=%xWxBiNK+Oo?yZ27g?VVOm!wT6QXvw1dyFUZ#XtR8<-S z{mucux6D0>`q`AGN7dYBa6zs0=u2XOZ5(;22HMi{mXK=5p8qy}x{)gO5l*^~Ej_;Z zNA&QfbeT0)?1H?RO|uefR`vi(2q<-mW~?`rnABG?QrncBs)V%jW^;+CiX;xRN*H48 zr8r1=8zV=N9o!{R+`H!okQXno`Cn&khO{5@lx6tIK54YW(tOr4)$q^vQxpM2U*-cP z<1c`ME?h9^iSn%SVSdR`GMP3TsAlCpihY%M80iC$PQ@E>1aFHtZ_0XX7jSVIVY9v{ z@`3VegN9hCOMF3uNLtPbY33aU?|`#Q3&5;Nfe8`bY^tKHW-^-#>ZVXMWTqfU$k;%o zHZ8@PyU#b&)td)0jW&^ny5t}57s6C-bYh)n0wwSxidLD+&10Ra%s<*(j2R0y$WNS!R{2i>NAC_iuiCpZa{#vUc0&WX&&wZUy#L z?zRGx6gH>=oM7}O_~O(8EW1nJ+GyY56P(whZm_v&X|0WjQZs8SVVCGc#6;$D%zKMT z3FgVZ&L3&}RjuusjgsbOm?qB&h$SuCf!t7mWsFEE?`@fM_THw*yX;rxiaiLQ%tCfZ z%$*iqj7wV-s`CgAPxNGFo_mIg*_PeI4+HG z;8&l7tBQwmjkaN zJ(<+LPwO(-xGh{4qU4_B!#pj37!-{C!IugycFVx!1xY`w2tTNni4o6logLJPRWO~`7>fj>q;G^C3g8Tpl@h_IYN$CR z44XoC?@|7kpKZCIgbt>EMMP)rb*d%V<{na3_z9Gxc1ArD?Wtf*oA1kAc{5Um+;Jue zp1#Y9F%0jYf3l-ivCQmV?2_u%^R5Vb-eJha)nVP)OkG{vI=Uwd8$ZRxD$QjsW*Wtu z;XCT^o!xUg0&{2a?Bue%!rP+yK{Woezs5{L_C=rL>K?rJ?q6yVVW0|VbeBcz{ulI1 zX-^4PB~=aU-2L>D>?ay^H}xgu{dxJNU;r$0rGdjG_fOS}5}v>lCmxEb(-$=)Vo7sO zoxZ0fhg&8o*&_FDwWT-+&d$!eg8!euX=!0f6*!zd`xljLbknc>)B8oLf<8mocJh1~b=|{c-kFg&X!D9Dla}-aVXJK)#|_5e^@8%qXf);j;ue4})AE(Tn~zK-3CTnPNvSa`aD`b3&zPOBdOal_ab?{`i}LjNqHcou}5} zgwWo-$kYqqZpptN4hm7o7%n5T_h>Ve?qzd%MxH zZ{8%wn#%QYWVNgxdA*`C49mYJ1wf*`bQ;BM^^U*!H!WuNsPLyeI+v^_T!9$@&k%`C zsmsMBOOjqb%uVBjyblB)Bor4#*OaxMJ`0@dlt0t`W!hY|iEE_JKa{=}J2UXZDAbnf zK4M&vKKCZy;Dsj3xT~Q$1u1XPyt(;*+*MHRO~a?cJ1Q&QE1;8lW+`B-+90y_P`RdX z&1o7zM!=UkKbi)F*~x$?v2F82C!@#|#RdMpVReosu7O=&iejtfgeNeuau=~j;VDss zpLQ;$Gub=V&LRpZXuhFc0Et(e2&-d%=Zg z%%{D3UdFeGN}Rmf_~46j+B@2#9Z`7a_n_l!s^CBhhet&pcY(x99GofWD!MSt6?&US zAJ6BYY_Sl07IL_%?qtFqTA8}SbmiMzKrtnl^7m?<-6bD$6z@oJ=bY!23#zH&=Z=>< zI2;#4ombrGWVN5ja-6`2ygB&V|=T%kTs5%9f4}L!*jB zE~>&x$lKnluBE)2V}&=``psP^T%^kXcKr*Bdf66bEr^_$%L`c^VpMx=4HMTMy?AM& z9MT8g4jXCt`?MlT9Yfcpn&goHb-S4jS%DinKZ>G}OBm5-S(DV@{`&RC^u0#CeVF)Z zyu)MQ(eI(Qp}nvMe;<0kfKj-My^JO^155*H zWQgI-6IqL`9lplI_%=cxNg^Ed)*Tu9Kn+w3I(S)OzJndoNxJ9u$&SWA>I#sqi#3b_dRdW5yKmGcjj{WDJ z)|W4qXk@nGR!7aJw721(6V;IK)3Y8Z=Um3Ryb7{O^6vxpwq;W(sAPUtJDjZ3fqTs2 z+h)BH-BQt_m67qdIh5!QtF~$(^NN0A%cisVEs8r7zQ|O?)d-P`2OD`p;xzR8+D4dC z-ee{2`E!{tVQRZX@(**^mVvOU7`O^A5%7dw%L&T0HT2v-w{m4<;58<8pwS+g7;M=r zn3sfEG-dC#W5k9%;JJ$eJvTjkE(R9^@}-bq66e~@uxQ6^?L@m)t#nLvJD8|iqa3aV zeYS06YL{Fp9f5dFl9Nx|Mepj%B6oAEca%UV!}obI3~QaZ1Ow*@-V~$^Gi|EnYnegR z_2u5c>0Q~(Fa#Z)Bl=3ph38I>6NEEuBK~e&c=4T_x5-m6qzKfgTy3k zwaWd^B@2*bKu||gQ?>%~1iW>)zbLAk-=3RDDk`P--a7*=im(I-F48wuFkW(N9U_GL z&59dxmL*PyUG+IHvGzEE-Bd_KQ5 z<((5A1vijX@z&z}a|JY9;jxX3ffmwB33QWg)VA{W3bBC@&-B7(6Z~6blu3khWzW!v zcPL@Rn_5TCZRKS?H)~)#^ij5xHWlS2f>FAlH6_n?S6j%QI!#P>zhOug&C{Oh0v-&T zbfXz*Ki>tsx{@WdMwh8g4q#4|3Wf*JgcuDHpNAc^UYY@@L8|-k(Emwj0aMIlqn5D2 zo>s$4(iFC-@B1dB)wrov{Ry0@+JX{+05sd;=3f%oEuZA0M(UuDXBfIoQ6GW&4#5bn z=X`MGJ{wSZT`mjugHOCX<4t@!rk)+@4frr zO!d-*w1InCl`C_Y4T=m#Y7|=`8<$dD0KpIo@hMaTvr1&ei z`qE`)%QDOxcukmfQ|d4beT^kqRHo)>DD{0_fr;|EPTdIDQREM!{l{D$x=cdzeATQfJn4NUSRaG8$TLEU< z2PkJbFFxGK=J^X&1&XR~`=33JmCbD|c~0@2mep$&74@m}gQf=p{i zqfe}}6MMNw3M*6eKKTj>I77F)G!*# zI=W9V9kP$osEs?lQ~7J5?$ciFEVONdTJOx{erFu1kZ(zGa_3;O4?YC^%h)MqR8t7k z}+Alky|S6J42(0Dg-!8u{dFGw}owat1%emezlF*KG#|ElxyRW)t+EQd{-XSg&gT`P`v1-Ap4 zc#-_GE~sy`NCfoA)FWIX;*i=2NE*ZlE#YtVE$JYMu_ z2l!o;O4z>~z9>Tj7&2O9U)}t>6ns&SsT#M`M$V@yttAaow)5{})tE9`+kpO#)^nHG zTu#-$Tty(mz%t(xX@sOYh*E#>ZlFLgO#Z|sw@NnuLCSYx6gdJ;MBrD)Y-Q{{QCuCh zT_YR2TFhl&fh(>WSd|JfJ`|O6MU#|8Ch8-PhPG51{x3=W7y=bis8u8rHG}+ECQ4TB zCiJd!3bU5hjCE&vq#D5M5My51-tLjPda#`r5&L%{q(U-gTCjxxy`@e;Nf6Uq5{cH3 z?5z7h;TA*LRBN3b@5F;Flu2~ik)rd`mosS%JV{qZmkAXxnQ20!V$oa`$-TIj8VJqCf-4 zoyMZrEkk}xJhnv3ZsLqaBPibRsKFW=Uw$#j$mANVCNKHTt@FuZ*$nb%Qr@(x+;VbU zYLBG;M9=*(4O$;w zajx`!5)~ZkUKj56Cw2CDBw8kUh$tOR3?N=~VDdHAl|pu#_H(Az2&?J$ zR;RTlhd|y?_2owDjk%)CsY08Lu~L!|wE~&^)zFm?tIIlfxXfvRqVn&Brwkr8Kf0h}<;TyV@3&f=WuEAO$87CVPYq>X-%m@;az$?@` zY?dxo7++P*MHtjgPM9j|{^s$jl?Ae@?DUV8LBfEeqHI7dG4IgyT%F!pwNd+X8QE1$ zg1Q$hWu3d+rFOe6Y8y@wVr31B_)%hFsi@6t%WX2WPc5Ld)zA^+^3tcaBgDijK#7>QTC5!4rLkV zR>GxC-2V7KTZqzkfBe0>l62W=^3VBE`=9@Cxz7LVKmJFmPYHP}L-pmT2@}-iEq z5{Ew_Lg83!%tAqGAD*EV8zVF+`UW0*GW$?TA22B<#BObyL#M;oNs)TJm~yIhhUQQm z&!)xH(y@?t!xIhiqqosoP-P>XU6xmhXKH9JPL=EiGg>gJsQ~3a`&b4lovtD6lI2+P zlC4yck=}E@$T!+)Cr`I*wYd$Z?$x~5_-xSR*xk1UIzpYHJHso3OPVMJZZi9<9EPSFmL{*CIw9?X1T~Sf)e=_lgKbsI*+OX1J;)z5uJ*%i{>XjwuP@!>@2N)o&KZwCU(!$)O2=hDSLm}xxn$IMtnl>W z?*+fNR|q@+Tso+be4vd!u=%R~vrTNoD$u&n(szc4h}&4T_(1Rh8?lT2dzhQw7Cx^H zUgKAprxg{$)qS3V9St8;qiJR%k*V2EJ(5?22*SzWQGrzFnRT06$erU~#3u5=9XX{FI{moZ zY=(CBVzvT@IIR_Oh-eC_7uLMllw4CxRg?)-s>-ttDL3>t?elrhqP<$RBFeS6dEyS2 zMW|z>o9njqj7~$MvYI+X10HeLC1ft+D#j9aV{0gx?vk@Lzvx_zoep(UWfS9x`{B;i zR*`-(iqx;F@_NQLs+s7H2-JpVsGbng-VVsyj`5U^F-}mUj#Kk}S+Cp|IY*WJ)AuCE z?4C%-LG6&!s>t=WE;T%3`acB0(k-io@P45+a_9jl43-!+@)>heTz<-@=dLXVPxbkA z@cx?%6|^R}Fe18Z^7v=a6ohtD;4kji>6VCaHLnI8ZO8D+>68*|ATSx^Sf-9R>t+$G z6>D{sOE<$MW+vnAinX(}1R2jG7_DSf5N4cc7tKAg3vV88BdPMFc|;3Y){1sxW_gZS zH078?ET>fW+EhnEtUiTmGwgj!64GGToDBKc2O7DxPkl^DxXQY2;9VxBb&2)f3|O#> zQFc7m49<~sm|g6j=skN;W}ZyIqW9+PA^C7;DnO@B0T_;D3J1GL#J%JS@kyf^tfGq6 zp8N#wk@kMl6$O{-sub6S$i?Io@NXbIP_4=KpgZl9bjp(t`raqmeCy`As7Dd|u1+7m z^xr;Y8uuks#=&kOh8PnD2;&=yG~EGIlNPkMu(RFcyEv}>L2ihmbpJ!@Y!ly69Kavz zsO)8MWEg6m?}5jr$8aS1gHi*X(kGIhqROsUoVyXCA6&VV)l+#9rffS@wH6&V%;3`3 zo5#v_kK2m?zwHd(qsFx^;ibnUI3HBaXhA>^iBFf0O{nc29Kyf!uFkYl{puiF@byrw z@Di2Vylw{TH7Zg&r%3H0ilw$qYL?h)B#b~>Q>bTNxxjj!eeQ`d7&4qq#O*Za2MU=K z)1_^@JDplg&w}aelAUG{h+4(EQ=R1J*^fEHB|{YMZUy-c_#WlP=tb}$LqK+ZCz4`+ z`t?7#gdd}s?$P~oFrJBI!4mg@WeT-G2wsRN43+S<>4pZ=uBF(VN{vc=qdC#WeGv-p zVZ@>5mwCG?bdKkKL={c7XC8{`c68^dUv}XRa~b1thhaXFQmfpQl+h+PUx-6ZB(Q=V@sOZL4Xj;+e1ZkoN zlw*06^+^TE1VY3rRsm-l}F9ZW0sO`bs7ZP=|-XjO#( z_1q8nwVcWrM$)Xa~tndVMOnM%TBC7xF`>7{rP-~BMlT&+n&$M(w z7Jh;W+fkLBk@7h&bsj_;qjE^Q2bvJdPPB@sz*N$jJ7(juH6dw zQIXf#M@^4DZ$l>AgR_~E)|kww#@Q&UV-Jc3YT^VFkbVVaDi(yu8}b1mN8J`iBVLI@ z;QNtXDg^Hv;Ac6-PkqQ@z7=)Y+^bOo#o#Kp5md`4AHsM9Wok822p|t|F12n9`vNXo z%pnJlc_OqmRaEF`j?lAUC1l36%ClPt@`*W{ZgYuFL6_b0G^1IzaK(9@)7A+oei$x0 zdrh*em?T&u#gYk>W{^Gi)4l=K8{DQnvM>|D3N>Q#(l8T#05M^prEsI&Dl&s!M?r4I zVj@wa2Q|Adk#J`hBf&UW-5SQ>%}q%s+*aN6jE)n#M5sa`H$p8J;6hCiE-2+%=VTO1 zGpc!%BXtT78MCsK@k%bUR3V(k&A`dlP0z{KF+SsO>+(GNu(mG_hbd`_#hfteLIDG{zK-`y0whrT2AE9Z!CMWmDCJz58W+NjP=G~-e zGzy#=F-SiWsB>qR*J}(s*wkoeO=+}~^Qs65hgJW6#y@J4-PVKZ&TN}n&T|1fMjB|swjCXcg#0ewn^Q=y77f;A1m?X^ z?RStR`|)M&uHujX=YRe~muy`3Jo`!I@(?Tn^#+d8sQE}SgtUrcA*~myn*X*~V7^=8B z2I2ualX6R39@-Hf?nTH|&bv@@lhlt2`8COm(BRhL=1wb3iIG5}s1Dpg zT$s91<9^kgXabIE=8!!1Nw|$DI-_>*$>=#UDM|$?TTX5}C2NW&{=~qllq&db{CwWH z2C;(hs80MtG4!-7d>Ev_5t@VpWRYOxdmgY+E|cFZL$6Ige}410E&>ffxbVqtoU1fR z9W7$f=S~^5h_{^zI*|j?4m!Q0#F6X=6v$9-Om|D0Dw?J%#0ff+KAZj;f%YROfqwK` zIKNS-Y-f;$63>{pXLs%cnsFjO*ozd<{cc`{Is%c zhTJh2{?rl`T^y-g6hb3#LMKyvLcsY_%uxQ!xZHGf>4uB0Omw6?jY z6hczo6^cVgC6LtOiu0zp!rfD6n3#Ia+gJD|;!I(AoM(AJ%o;eZd%O%7!rHV^An=y3 zGGxZpNi-ER<^ocS$!}>bqxCMAVaG}!?m53qv@cHJYRoiArvu$qST51iU8giK_BM;B zVJ`__FBxn%sml{Rc4E^a>lI{(gR%o&2DpZ?m2zR8Rbk+1M1#Xr1v~L~?y$TKNtmEA zSPDE$hizVx)Wsm*CYi#spQ(pebGFQ2^5Kl+WJ=p8DHYy*QvCcbnO=tFiu4BXu{*+L|*U|^i?B-x6Msp86A z9ZjcLTA5N6zr)+28H4*d@j{gi=!uSX|Npc1E=_J6cfROXshAZR0a6dkvP8uwf+l5~ zKGaxa>3HtB8%K6k0!XS*1=a)Z_R79HFYd~BIVZv~C+3(O#kDtD%-o3>M;Ow^-@^VR zH-G;}Ru+J6J_IDXTfMN=1kmWJtbF_*zsC_mwM5frwtij_Pa7et*sJAHcL6H(KIB07 z(E90x%y`3}963O@{<5PIV0bJ&69a}Loz2?$)R#^n&s1^frZ=1@D^4}#IMsdI^b$P?No;HSRj9 zAV>sOXxj@Pzs+^YXWWPb+6Gz0lr<_^HWM|%QZ1#dSD_#+Oh~Lqu}<;Z8yWc0BS1Bn z&g(%>I<;u0Ph*wTz`BqmN#DkCW-B`o#l4s9=sQ4ta?4~ng?mI@~mnwF4@k%X-gEO7DyYk>WX=QwvBN1&;W zb&{E}$v0x%XallegYLBa{T`wD_hIFda&aH#E? zC#g1E^o$6_RNoo8xv9?Y6Ht|qM0NlN79e+MB}C;Q^0|-9jMx@&*Fk=+3%}mm=-4rF zKRQT4aIt4vLZ`oh+E~-MP8$0yi<^TIT(dPfe|iBx3TrL_VA@;VVSwTq@D~yqC?Rpe z$@0L8Pr4_vmh6U#D>b&Ba{bUpEmH%?gbkv%$$+LI+woFM(qCWii^Zh zK&E60FviP0jw-6(r8+Cc^G;6ffFBS9xry4cSa*yfx2OJq=n2yDZIUl~m3gw4JAGU` z+9V&={V#3y8LBJEgg!)1F6|8;gJPRei~`x1N`0%OKFYjV!KJPSt4~(t@>^HpwMptTk;SZqM^aXuH6(_E}h*d z)1jUWsI5W&OQf=rhF?C@B#e~q8!Lax0Jg+TZcm z=>9I-T`Dft&z~SU^#3EKB+eWk2Ri&E{}+0uBe?d7$|N#Oi;p57O|miBH;(aMZ#WMg z6*41+8CL~)p%9+25t2WcRil=-3IL0(mIl_FXq0;q-Yn(XSD1gp1t;D!dtym!hdMiD zkGCpB`|o>Cv|&T_i&&3$1WhJeIwJOtWDCc*1cjjcEu1zP+bmcm-p}Y9Oe1dX$9V0L zhU1A4!4GDoVc{ zCzt@`*ZqL;OSw6)VN7HfxPI>EPVN$_v&*6H6xBPjo!{k%sUcKa%>EXuH(`ZJNZrVk zrz&_F3|*tfQ&4eCuG1&+Gvl~U9ToSIMUz5dXT_a6KB)35m^!cej^EHB6+^gy7)M(f z68o3M?kCg_ZMA*|K*2+R`-#G)+k!lQ#gq~}Z|Q*I4KbF+`1*Y|drP$~F0q)Af>%5(S2%zQ{2OSgH1M z*)sxGas9^%1Sf(Krtfeb;V>HyfS>J`E@U~6w8f@}1K@IqYdWXCODpYX!0n`MISfZh zdv1syA)qx18(H%W@hbkge!i^zM}#m!yY{ovso>@wU&14RDnU!6a|Jy-ju=y*)I2x8DlKvCO^B?UG!>-kkDDZ5z`@zJI$&64DVr zhaRDUNU9*{QyjSw))qGqkp(7WIxF5KnQ11;Al|M|0NH}xh}=8Vv?@K}{b!Emz}na+ zb#J#$utfU>*LDbyJmE-l5(t|NOunvstZ$iQ2I5GZpv;inkbjIIje*uHyc9*Wr(F^t zi<)4_DRt{184RgT+oeOfZeWg;A#7vJZAcm74VQA<$d*@ocUp3q=!;ufW_ZUf!Z8|Y zpqDnv2#&*J+HtfFdsra&hO`D{=*iI76x8x$U|0+DybTO$rd1!xSK=k5!2Q3@v`fS? zUW1W00jo%;`WVO>G=@oL8-v7^lmhC+lsq1wP^+PU4Y-}negaR0Ley{+vey!aO#Z>V zc_ZC7yt1m@seBL(H%y+(SbjZz?UcDesm=_VQ+iO4=Xnt^^BvI^#Y2KucxrCMK-uwo z2rq+4=pm%TZ6Jj9S!qrE5vt>`jaPQYHF{gMr1OsU8}+NvjkQv)Y2#S7o$!E;_Mf4N zafDNN{fDmM1CMUEq2rFZ|9h_yfA~UqjQu;j(00Xzltjx4$D}{v<%|qb4JZQ{S4M_N zhuRD~s7|0;`EZVY9xN%SNE~>GHGW)TuEDjn>9B7Nh- z;v<*F8ndgwU1%T z!!*RV*^0Gta6$sV>|@5u7ZdItkBdzQ4jv~`!69j+DAG%UUrj9A5Ebso1c_-Le%72& zgFn~#dIfG-9GWH zqTGd{4{~nlaJ{K-b)b^_8Hb*9T^t0_by@Bg5^AnxN!y{YkgACEU<1yw!)GVJiMV@@ z-q|r?2AtB!=0)T|6-rEx+#}zzC_6;jrzJs_>*LZIb#l-i@mJul<%EzIMN^|+Ac>$R-!H=cvHsulapOAvP-p}ro4Ale#w7X)KkKW>*~dcUr=+?n7X>IcOR+R zLhYU8g8F8phb!zyV(hl{62^l_S+3(~sC3fE;8Uf6Ow$c;&E%b%2bQzO#G%IS%ZX9u zp#rxzTImb_y!sD3Rqp~lWRq6@G_g-L10G@qGypPai>?Zh7n3lK;bqOqMY2J7M697F z{p?7$I|Ye|#UQDHpv}q99wyE?s^Cd`x{=x__1lqNS1zD@$>DkUciup$H;-UYsf!!c z`Z;`(6r)e}xQ+UXXmE~lTB0b8wCh7b<c=8Pn3aAPi|YilE9v@2iMfT@wW&27r9z zLNg6kRrHngF%3dMb&h^pUlwC8-U{)MvJ>0ZuEP43pdGmRN%ZgaZ+u!FztA=Aq_0f5 zVJVsNf$Ej8LcCd$ods35$fLW%)^2fz+L$@LY#kee578~pY;^MOP>47usG zXH_=``-^Vw!s!?u>z)_A4o`Pd%75gWPRf7s_xy{$|GW3!{mwgo=YQtNSjzH+84B7~Xy01D=l!Uqrp+Z+iQ^U0+3i_o5G+)LmCE zF8YMkYu)ws8{_MFV>~=RY+QjKXa2tr>XN_at@qw~N4|Re`aAFKe*L@ey|w%G?|gUX z>+inv_U_Mr@4e`n_1ZeV*d|=`kE{XjSRR~@g2L7iK9uwS>%aafzOfyTGygtOnPplzKXZOtENsUs#P86})?ACe@&)Jig?r|BIkmskkG-uczWwE} zh02TZGJ60CnAU9O*1VeD7)EjTSkh#;8A}<)xEs8j%e61m-b#*huGQ^+x zVc<+NJ{|~mwMi>~+405xbThs(z8{;)O??0p%=JXJqn^j z5Rx9cBbPOhx?&IO2LtMEpjEMtk=5X8x5$&Sj79#J#PWnF!KgO>B%zLqDj?B}NVJft zwRTXzx7jVFf=sf33o-$n4VBUM_J|Lm=7pjP{<^C+LBMy#Cc=Yl+VqAf1M#3mvkH?% z6#sQv=<~b@5cd`!K8CE8pxqQ3eiI<>WxC(5a>R!|RzTt?W?ExpXMje3qxj$^7`%kR zU|tWFda*@Zi2SGJibra7`4?}XdAla+zMxTnrRb^n+Wc87u9DLwl)Gw4kaI2M>rsE1vRa*uk^>f=`E4TR~WN7%1VGNx3_O%wY@x( zpA6K2!j7CYfw{xsulpQOREWf_2l&+Wwo0a?ApX& zaqD1Urr(5O`)Q{J2t%Ys!E7T~_W)&2#vEbswS#`oNXUW=&qXBoCM4Tet9!R-NZCsR z6OT&knO%^Q;QlDHrO?&xmLsI?Y8g<)L%}Nue2?mBJNb(@ z@z^(s#~!*i_jhXesCeyK@J$f5HL@R@=4o$(@;m4-5XBx-iit2aqEI6^BO}@ywA(cb z$ws;;JwNgs3-2Z<+wZ~eFOwN6udB4yH_A_MqOh%F31?B|+J*Q$^_7F91+jJY2~E*U zj+nlj=-iQ>vxUWMxBjvtJzup{uP!7jU7xrN|2g4*y(Xt)_mli)--&VmtX{IS+?cF) z6VB~r-Q2ke#;!v!Hqv|Wrx0bEioGDb3_LFEDNdklGmhNw#STb0$p ztw{(}5OgeRcfo189}%lGx>b;HotwO`BtZ=79{%SN2-sV)97+;z z6AJ}d8*sQZJ^!_b>B+wX3X7&Db~zZ>^_*4y}Pqm z|C{)O`;B#`ih~r%z0hdv$_lBglt@siB*RyTng%t+6^WjTYGveH8FMj4T8g6I+k!Se# zS~1+6WXA7!XAAt$5$cRzrS&r+Qqv|TTn#Kk_GrUa7g#s~7-U}*<;TlEBi2o;9-CbA zjy+%7pqSv7D!-!I&!pFfzBp8B3oFvBP2|@rS6$F|$8L`qn@zH+XMj0gx|8d5ytl5Z z!4}l2Z7;sQn9W?O#T+%POdA*63-X;p6S7saM+t;X@25%94IHSK1uODXV`ifPnr8ea zAp&F(-C!7&awHnT>1jJ8uwKU!DXB&z@!c!90~DM9&*dQqji76K>!hH-HiyUzT-9^T zJLuo4D2kG44v|)Ugl%BUR!0~d6N+jWqdO5{2^2cJzKD=Ice9U!*DT@OSPM+I6*j(u z|3(H90{Ei{*(sO6dm^B(QDxaL9NPxc%@+|i<(@zCj6deeQ2oFLM=>Aobjub70;Sr< z>v=~x9U72j-%d7^Ovc&5j-Ie6=^D;#ey2S#v#4$kzxeQrb;%MPf1-Xi4&PLlGPyBr z=mjW#O%1!B_72_c)UG$GWnH5pUPw)2C|OWgsV`JwgJRgj_9tY7!C+MciYPiQPRJys zA*vSwDyCn&$7(TcQbF)iL|kuO2D32=WO-hN?l6ts28S1znF?w2(cl2=psy z{d7r0O}6CVC^fi8H+QoKlHZa&F-P|`w5~^n49N}YqdlDl%ZK3YwmR(rr$WlR9i>Lw zHH7^iVh7xX_dYnAVY)W;!jY8uV#*^m*O1y6-S`S#o1>+DRCgGZ^O@ zrm(5EV(DGd@pFzo*5PjU7VU^W)m@@mqa?%uIUvb8H#rm%-`*Day=z#Po@9yu92MY_ zPY7yev}cQxdRqnJfHyCo6Yl7iCa2woau=%ivCPYa+Y_f9*YyfYdHT~KTJk~7%vA`s z79fI$m`*%xW(LQu)52bGy^Xsc+&Kx@iM!e3Q8jy#x!g^}FbM(S5R>_|=#)b^_Ht@c zo3F;Ap>02%I)d0w$&7O!-b3efi+6_%{C4-DMxpF5)cOT)RMVX;;CD%#N*AH^gPGec zcgTtUYA6lWCzwcV{iH&={1xJ34DT%#0SYeDO}$t)Rj$#>)m(W{qA?Z_uY5j(+MWu^ATNxe9IdL z+;`r-`}W;;U+ieJj}s*Z_Kj!BF8@-UCb~JE!Q~xUOPk<+Fj%CJoG{Nnj`q($~Grb3w>VhDHYiB(;P}i zmvs==&wVsys%{{%%E9hdu8I!dz12kaJi@N>^VyVaG>4O)Dw!*2rb&-6q{aTj4Rs%L zqAcP~W?KzGjz%axwA7aM*{dagd)cutZ7$znt8bnbP+d7FtcR^fRGwuAxummx_x+7; zjZJbXLQPPjzbHHbD(&*khF7T8?qyBfFUzlfJ--=;`$b)u^&f8r;%EN&?-$ua>n`6| zWcLQYQ&*Xmz`b(j_^pyyAeo*@1!Ax&@3fJ=oJ(i9&A$FEd}yg(jDHq&-ZlPMZYR>? zC3LA)R!9y+n@4TGY|I`06MF#o?Jgv|{=>VDa6PG%4T!z84K0rCTSuUWHh?4q97mnJ z+>Y~v!I1;5+o$9&oeb54oP@5C`=t<&w$T+vlx(|Lx(3%NK#=s+_$M~+0{<>?PlZ6^ zgG0KeaV)~?V6zt*lq<5=VIhyyfW6~xqG@wN1#=*lYU|$QrdSmQX zDmu%p#3f|^cM-9hJB2%G>O_z5cGS)yW(Pbq5b^uqpTTg-+Y?O`e26vdH~Vt_K~c|M z+OCWB^FkYTv&O7IPE0$Zkd~_5tQ$7y_D0ivJQ}RnMCLbX>OCt&dJ?e-Yn# zYx356w~w?#8ZBlAoQ2u;sXOeB8TDnQ0-ShSSgJN(&t1f4SHJw~i!#yXF`*aEokG}X+nIlr6vD+(aoJEjNQH3H@OJ)K#W^vaZ@uA@Z|59W<)yCH8}|7L}5 zc&cRN7$q)fz2v5;l40EvFN(+YtZx16YCiw^|MuUt_kf-cQH}$DY)zH<9o}cnfBqu7 zFNOx1IYE-Zfzp%FxK9YCBLC1g375n)@g48tjl0>O|MSY^5TP4R2_xT&pxlrx9s}uC zxb}%s`Vq6|Ce`ZZhs!NNMiouf&t8tid)vpOX5y9e>oiE!3+z8|*6H6PEqiDIS-*>k zM<>ybj#1k}+O6qh7jkbtCQ#Jyiz8X}wC-X><)N1C780+5xqQ;rB@haJSM-@LrE~=0 zr;H+pf}cUwE>0nfM}+G_pG?{aTVzH^(dCC41PlN_5gHOcA$+S_Jy zw^N#xSuT6GBQ2B&5NJ-Y#oXmRKR4=^u3HJN|k6%+&tP2LCD6fZ2v`kBc5C}vEj&WGyUEF|d{qg_H` zE452>Nzh&P(-1q8zt<+BDlpStQabJ=-pkxYm6}95L)vIW%x138Z6DwqbrlJ=R&9O! zaR{?<0gFJ)PtF(jzu2xuaQDD&C`Yzdn%krlw``mrC?CR#K#gcEq}))Kb=v`6Pjt8e zJe^ZcS~|bcn@zivgN+uBV6=py9WLcieC+bM@pJbFuAQHl{htu$QYbe1DB2eP+pqpv zP&0q~)&Cr7$f96G&CE9U=USU2Uw&P{zR#^$09=TZg7bPxvP`5iVX7HCDkz|geOm=+ z1*}Tc5hRlroZyqF(@0uVb;Sr9>P7XXDqN;Z(skmbF1vr<`S8FeQ`sYKvf7R(5>$P< zxy|lFCBttokJ`r1Z;*1a754rYK2wxIs=5Bw`|rJf`)>A-frp@RLe*l)d~sR|pZSwx zKFToo;WDY59f7H-eD62~$k9@j>fYXuw@C!$r^*yVwxl_>wEYq&85JYs>gUJx`j2g( zLW#<*#LM=SDOn^6m*dN_xlfsDMkyZfEZzI?|JaZEL)1=JhCa)T0uVEfCK5ApFg2iV!{yPR}&oDwyP#SVnq?#q? z@U^7az@6yFX3XE>Y`d^bDK{n5QCdr4Xs+Rv-I(RF9!%~OKOdy9BG^po%6T51J#&$C zyTS{YB~P`)QUN~GvA9)}>UqQju$bfTKY%I$A-1X2#nUC$l%)ry5?GqhLwdaK%Yf)5 z)w%^LP;4}Vp%&!c$Z}D6l^vVP2R~WwmSg!&JEDlFf zXDGao)ZxlDT`#CxEf@KbEe$f$E0Q-pOn=<`x2pa{X$v2SYuNay$s3yt+C-6I(hkV( zEBVx(o!KJ$QSGO?tFnJE?S*9MJ^p2XOi&q{k$yf*^Q*6;;$hmEKsyr`q^tdxZZ47z zM?Nr$ukXdNhhN41Y%iti%rdC*_Mo{UM{Ynu@O>EZ2lWZF&zF6wah`Iw-?3MIL(Yk* z0=U~?E| zFxEMS;shQhrAoAg@B-w;wo<(ldZa;}qH#lALxUUbqRMAeK6+|EuDFI4_)f`o2yHh; zxHP|kyOP6l>OV3Vtu(Kc-Ry@g$M&qGF*7_`j&_;f=TGPf!qUbfdDse-2eQ*76IM0% zc`?5l>(8o0xe$$X+Aa4V`{pnI_0_M_X&zQMUjR~^NUqi}FfgpjI9nOYUwqJ~9UDKd z62(=#UxoX=oA^c_`2=|W^%p)|x%1TgqVx}8YX15k|0`8giQMyVzxroc$^DRdQcCEz z=P6n%w;q7GlD+rty|=z|`-+@U55OljT_2a^LNzHlDg#@bkl$IB5m%$JIEz9^=$Q^e zy0e#%cJ_0i5SQnZZHBKLMDB+U#ct(P`fLo0DPRtl=#hVbG)GUJBR+NZQ4})x$Nk(a z7A8>{Ws=EOm-w+W3$EwVMXCo*`K5}{XyZILOV^oFr8f|Axv8@wTQA8*TjO)D4q<|n z2dE017KH0}h&iMthh~8UCjM|rs2EMyH7S(& zRx}yz$cplldt`|>P-Q~M;%85l*C1B-H}CjeY^a5hUkNu;`nc;2=TrXy?HmXqhD}(e zZ4}{?!Z&~-edWI#m9=)HO2SwyCfsOuhH7i1^HHw9q+CC!Jrj#v$^lHx!7U++?ku1Xxhx!{%>fB+70PuH8P;KN@)iHdFf_r z@m$;zNTwD$EcWzt5Ib4osfYL{)9iw*epDJcU-{Y9j()T4-D)59$$LIuHjNzuJSM2I!^hM|@~X!!d=GyXi^ANY zPnwtFvF%^0{bkA=41i5})DAntnA5zyrvy>QbKEzgATd>*^Jq-5R?C%Gr+za0v!EBD_9Y?z5`%Uh(1gLybmX(*1ABO%_}wM4{!Z>&&nc0}0Zb`0 zV-d!J?VC9*p_3&BwgCQDja|6l32Y-6c%dom(YWN zi4uYQdhj9Hud4BWhe9^5P5$@c=gH-^by0U|$Sc#iBfCx9&W@cns6^;0ljq>-jIhsQ zzK5Mr8bJ7Rf5h&6)7o(Ic|lls0P=SF@NaTW?JL94y)2Qr1m$g?$+)_-%ub{|j4{NK zGPggmO=Er3^rUZG!4>P#`&xzDauo8L0C870-P?Wg)vdqmju2@3*h8`7ZaVe(H_m?w zJcwwJ_iZ|EX5x@;T5r?*6WyqUf2-irt)QMjVa#jWA{Q`?_C2n_*hk{eCzAcpl^vXR-{W2Kxz z9lB8>?0pcHlZ>xq2y_Co?W1LjdOGGiz}SN4yg>xgX&zxZj8|408)h+1KWy| zG1o&p0{fFE#Hz>pm!qEZ!U^+0+&@UTc7O`OkyemF3Avy41sie4pW1A ziH)$a>)%tyMrApcwd4NbO42ZSxv2weAVO3OY?$<^R)~4H#6g-GaonQy<85MYan#FJffbHi%XU z|1s4@$I8zk7nfLp8}H6C<$b9R2IxDXEQ%m?x&E?iECJ+JwT}zsJ--&4mVQfnPqo$_ zka$vX)J8%DWUPYItu2kbm;4mMHK@!rG^oPHnF^0{PxzH1@}w&WhERZ5MvF+_!@`E$ug zV-8lz(c^+~GxU1ZxYX}g2!(tWmWqWSS#!Ol3_g7%qh@NHVfCgIAo-v%pKhkuVHeD} z&MDd{wj!2sRWD>Ez6t|xFAkYB7B;q@BlX+3{I#@xQ}_2%aaE*QrrOy^w%CS3w9&Jf zqE5PEG9Sh1=d+g1#+$F7f66jm3ak&Hf<|Tm>JUZHR+(g5fM(b+I-N6DCcN1$GemWD zzX$l^HHKp6t^tOV_gBA7tRNi&u7j59fUA;kj7ftnohFl@#+G)I^J_`Ti(w+j)a81F z-rkgpVS)6SDlD=rQKj0BT!=uU%Cd)MPc;l5jyKqnS?Z)kEJ{wf$2mH7-%A3sjhF1W zUN+_T9j47axq3FTV{wL%YRYlb?UmG$_GJwlRR&dFrYGfJe#suBz4F3Nsfdh!Qj&W43U zI*@eyf>N2^*;m|HOctcZx=Q}E=qQ&++{?*TUXp+vN;U9D2tu){FU8eLBgb!R_2w~U zez_A>U%$)zW8e542rTD-Ye6YsF<~35Q@bF2SQSMkte*x&tG=8O0>CFlLRY(&UUUZT zQj(o;5Uz?ThcRb3zmQXrg~E`geBA%_-~W{u+q5>y5WrALcubKQq=AO!m0~v79$fv- zHG(`sokrtWpK_I0@LWX0kE)3|n0e4n9j27hds1!J53Mq=745ZUg3Tfd+jjEYKIHZX zi9Q@-pe+U!gNu!I%Xm-gHLOV?$`IRpVo^g9AiFk`89e~aDM1q0)AjS2lwDFipC9|c zuWu)zJe-rcsRKj?4{bvRcvw=hc~xDUlpRINN$aq34P50zwuGB8>2ztu<(>8&AKLqM z_@thjik`EIqt8v=S1gO@|78*v)W$6BDC&=~lyfR>#jixf=WCt;n6WUNwgO6!@*P^u zei;xvQ+Cy8>iaD?5IFW8(@+-9e^S_Vq5$8Cj=r$q1vJpcAp#yaZ=N2MZvzyQ0XkGMWhi-TNYI|#%ut!ye>TCsbYtZqJu8cvxeq82P+1Io zlX+dJkc#4l=~#!+XX#EF8}Du$UKB4R?d*NDV>;(Rn@iVCsc1GIfmFZ#4HE=mo3j4G z5BvX4NOXVLW$#YjxxE=x(Y7V-T5*j!ZT9A>V0k@If>Is$p~796^&j|X6-N}(nSu9f zGe$!BeVvNT;utiq9Yuk(wg!|G_p1b>4wiX5^q{x0zmUVSd{vdLee~Pc&!3>WzW!aZ zz09y}u{2j!qiW^w=k%f0u6uS!Yj!B7;C zrc3GveA9P%rSqVT+WAtVi8v+Hi$Ls7W_@i?)k?V~UqEa3S#G~V@ry#~4nNhsWZ&eU zqA`w7JG#2#2QXpeGcV~z4N|01g@n}lziOMP2oxgrNR^I5b|cJsrTyuv=nMCzC10MD zo7+yH^JK6p9wJyivPOannyL`i^lq9*yvqz{vm!w0<=mgigRJ>v^d=G@W}v95;1Jy= zEji4?9Hus9DLAK=kr4l1st^ z_}Nrb3oKil2_rXBlpJ_8Gvl8~=ZH~LwRP!=W5~@F#1?FpZH%C)x|9eZBw{77q+y^@ zo2_#Jg!*wR91eC$IcJMdGzKI!U`J%u5rAtW6zpN`)I77w}RQ`NvXR(e;dwVk@S&%GrcoS17PyHdZyJ8|fp`N*B?x zF#j-T1;ETa8^d$de+fCVC4CHl2Gp)-L(}B|l_Bm44%YN3Z!m<7TRuX8DVYhK2*|8- zfHBf<-pil5Wa<@Lva)qfFx-;?ayZh672VG4mXDU!znPW9A_ZH@|JKxSO}ag+%nYrf z+sDBAYZWud>r%mWK=w&1fvwHSWY*%0Zh}JAE-SolD2n3~RO24~Tw6hQ5X^jyuy$_bTdQL|b z(I8{sz@6h9QOFOU_BHow<|L0ob-gXCvAB>I`q0ps27|YoYYpB%oH@kZxV(BKin}C``He(p9+LjwGUA#X@l}J)F<`X);I$@ooJ6-x=P6fX$yXFs9(` z2@#gc!)((0n5RU$Yg~6c2Cr}ZeCdPm^>fky5tUayF{*T0+no8g8R_B(ML7t&MXE~7 z>epWTsCaX2C1$Q?&@4)f=ISdkzC?nsyLcLeEVRrRbS6fH)GSEcjblpc1(X|Q)$P!G zP?95{P;LtPM{$H$N7ifb6F=se4=S9`&&zViLLv~?s5dNBczbFak!?a?FgTBIsk0Px z49|KkRF+m6)-k19+$9Zedk}eI2{*quSlfjoq?FGniZ!q#OVOYoS?NW9nv(wfYpLt?M8Li zr});XW9C16d&uD1|HCcJ!vCi+CntU%c#%fNA!@S);Ka77RQ9k8Gd}U5pL7eVA?Zgr ze=PU)m#Oe_u~YX@eWR)>X%URNZH*;JA(x5RWsyAM{r^GBFxONd<;bBX(E7^|#GS)E z%p%1mO5qm!=S*Kdh=s_jD0P^C=Crg?Mc|4_Wy-TwxBrh_J~y_^e&E{qiK!$VAmMk; z+_vctC;n98hAPZn#tvFMkwSwFT(UvBlyVHJ-Is9cQMe=(^Q%a-w5@}T32Um5$PtrR zcqbc)PyG2mvs-C%xko3i*n6YZA0cnO|K4|R-_0WXD8ymZm+*Ua#f)ZDH)+8^l;0l> z6s$1l);277UD#cI;eJo^5A4AhsT3Ku3MZuJh!BC9h#Q-Qe~K(-M*WGNME_4LBe(q_ z<^KiIDHbi;w2&8g+Mpk|VGeYC9v|E0T(%wIB5lwetR{BoIYpBDseknAKTaZZzmcpu zDrV?Xxx{o3X6vK-*V@=;Fd@q5?k@6|-}o9tSfu!u<#S7oiK!#Rb?(!Lig2<=fNL^b z8_S-MC2N+>}b{_mL`@UwE+CmBebqiio7K z{ahpc;vp7E9{)EZ<7m;S909>nYiZuiKI(S!Ed7ObjaU}Y$uTlOrV!Hq%Fk?bVzXP1 z>sj62&VnAi<)S?8+JN1xOf^GxPadf#K~n(B3%$pA6J`JR1etS$0#WMGS0S6kKn-dA zj}c{uU+1eVO@#`bW~OL{I$$WVv#9G;3b8sk1_svb^>j#SEs0SLxnjzRI(Bb} z&5ltr8>Nf_5J^@+5>Vve{xYt!ZFbiLue>EBI?=N{m)>Q}w{P!epT#vtbA~+ee8KAE zp=Z5Vvd(;~4mqMvoNfmtu^qF-@hatFs&u)^VWCX8wUJnHhIX<<_kT;niQ8!twZi4; zHlbUjWpNwjh?Mu}H=Lzw(%t3yH;9vbPTAfj$l{1kPMx5tF}agmNjKy`ff#k;l15Jl zQF9C-yS*|$eD4I6>RlvbbLMwIsr5Y@3C}Yb0E~nc{8zuPK(%Jqr zA~uxmi~Dp}H14>Y{iMpy{Bbg)R((}3wt?$L*&ZQm7tP=R1yV#z0PLmCmOJzL^s6sY z^|i!?C!m9vy(S_NY$6-lkTb|aL>wvna^(0ETxX8})myn3HJ%cg=;J!>lR*xS8Y8VBe~U*kI3I=i@xp4g{iWXAXa}c>6I8Bv0{`G|bwy${8=(>od~CdFY0{5MA8Qz5QFM(vfo|1lniZfvL;}$* z5~EVs{-G7U9sj|ekKVb32YhAwgt~tdt&RAtX%@BB7~^bw8V{zac#@DCX1mE1Y=ylq z^-ZF_&~4dG!BUP3Th|3U#6?YV^jxFQ5qOk*0JmpVUEoLmJC7>A(AiKbYM3wk$~B7S zVkvy1XMNgondy4vLXCVvH;GWGg7}no|6mXr=BXT2$VO0K^dh&+-PDm)o}Ih|sA~Yf z1RNqdQT>RigskKl>jH(1JVKU^2q#x$gCF?0(8OZYGz-^}u|d%CyO!zaOUR$?=gwkZ z_e8gL@OwG}&^@iltJ*$9d8~IU&A_uj;-SysjNq){n`z1ofOGgC={nE%XGI< z398)$q>mtfCF@(3!Q~}blcy~}l1^r`5|eK-bWPYnXU_dbp=Cp)Hmazk9GDj~qA{0! z%sxXED4DkxWEse7jKzl$;gPp-sre}SNCZkVy`HT=yt|Ivx47K{t)@qj>pZ0($6%L? z%Jl4s#I}bCo#t6z-bDJZybL7%K-DiSTpy&gMvPQcm};egPhxO)tfA^EmhDP64|&)~ z`zI1fxpV>Aho8nW?*m9>9EC~LnJ{vBH37T5&Uc(x?wZD)BhFVKJ)GYo5< zPxPBenuh6{gD8}6>3!Tx1#>N-6dPVKLvuILrt)}vnIkwcMF_-I63IZZJ0Fa!sT{>lYtFceuFrREANqKLI@8{=A9P( z^WeAw!uh4kVa`)CYsFf&9ZnW$t59FDLdP(17bS|-*3bR5_UVMNj@twr!1$@sZ;8!O z3!?K=k-P!gH4s;m4oOF{ilY`#swse|nt;p*8J^7m`#u4~d+1HcyAoGC>1T*3B2keE zm%>~{L7kgf06Yj#y5a8l(j&ST@WrQdyD)$GQ_`trG{v$J1yliRONjryK~3nNY%L3fppN_JWKyit{s zk-KT=eYCV!`E4sSJ<@L4;MG>LYX@4l7(k9-g{<+ED(ihf2p>v1S!lv%a1Ts3w;=Oo z-}gCFcI&P8-+%iyK`SJ9@%Q3pgl%T!ZZ0MWG$RmZY$qN(T5BM>b>dt@)K;aHh5~!a z^U_w5T9V*NkYGqT24gc_k^(zGjBC5#Q6UfxR=f~cSx$R4d`8=GV3=79Q3sK2iS&oax8aJc z8V6$&x6M?LgjTT?8mCaNnaUv3NWyCK1BqwiPzs1qd|G`{23WGASRsuga}O1w3^qwA z$0%$QMH& zXidFXYKfsKv>qB@Kdcoj$;kk3qV2(ziOr<^1f=-DGB#FfB>@^V)bI`w5L~{KjYX>j zEa>OJ(&lWicU|FuqMz?0<7bT&lU0H&mS#ViZi+6f-1zN2CDKoAl(8#{HDEt+x<(ZL??VMThR})p=POLb{YaI#@~dC}!X#Rnw{{i=Z_{*(9s-?8xuc3djQ(gL z-#fzKm?yvZ>WjTA2VAs1^SW?TCv~Z&bGgQl8ZyvCn;V?2%XwX`pDh%%dly3B8zpX- zE*Lm`;G@sg@?)rRZzMILio1!&jB6gc23+pa!mFn27wAWYS~%Je49Mifp^g9JMY90w*CJc+wYU{YR+YvM)*yy-mB# zJhhGc%YUWXgRf!ff62r<;(OH7sRKZwMa!PrNhK7UU=|xCCT_9lsYQJ2RTAjEJnhyN z`&VZN>V?$Or;J^CzH6Ey?+K?3>4Q21y!V80#m;n6Yda1XO|W`4#ysIVNMRc zIKU@EL$x$i#Z>*+iXyKCaaGa=J4_s}iACdb@nDLhJG!izp60+8+;rkeR$$VQ@_6=f zhM_@;?ijH;myyIn$KN_@h%xMqt*;}lmjBck>gJE9LVEdx`1RjM zRXNoXpte$C#x{|O#EUCZ!0}rLTMeoc`$hrwZ@>C~{`|YvNcSn?fB9!NCxmXQ4d9Bz zsJlEFFu^*r-~q=6n8y!gHPg-OQVqsc_-TxH#%VuD4AcJSFrnCcYlQWQ0wmR7Cuat$ zC84Bc^f~#~;oS0vlq>-XY5Z9yh_)6Ju@#II_HmPA5t>;Qdye`S6)=?QSf>83Te(1N zoYxC%RCY&_K2+fBsW3KIn^}6=lZQ#v0bxaMAA65jC(>sY{s+ymAJ?s2&a@FU4^CP!pI^0!LMpTH|e0f%pR4XPXRlrF4A(CxM%|T$cGwr%3 zrp^0u1Bjez_7TxKMqy;vsWIfzy(t7nYR32Ycx1(suwdYKwB=M)n0-Ru+5N{H}mq$~%86C{8I`8-QR zJ$B9EKL`gV3WcB?vw0Z>h!nS!oHbFN7=UzLU(jLq&`h)c;d9K};jgTGZb=j*aV%|v zrdXsO2fyhOIdm89FS4%*Bu@%uA#20cX}r1edmoMPNV;JbxKI-qHkVJs%u2u6j$ z@-aaR?1N#r#AdwJJCe}=RH2|!*%RBf!Dba7RK=44{KP>4HemcG5h| zL$pm$JL|GfrEKv@EP;L!L%#?SILVz53D-zAPpgs-k1=|rcs|_x^ zG+}Nn=Vzt3@%njV7XC!($b`K^FU5z+E!P)E^*1TM$r?%=A)eUAd_MPk!Q7U9qfJ&{ zBafblYKnz4w-lX3lu9AG1A|J7HRWNv`?{e?Ue?ZXK(p{6OnryTG^z9~zqtlknvpu{ zK%~cX#wbm#WsQojt^u_sCo-bxPsOAMp?P0+$7%dh%F{6oC<=0hvJoBM+&VuDqb%g~ zkdg9HLWtEU>~e_JR$wS@sE>a0AolgH_~2o$fP8pND%eI+D6~SCX4OvyP~J4w5*7TK z-Y#sD^w`^v2&wp>qiypm&8YH|rluI}ZPz>Coep5N_G>IS0ruA25}Xt4aHzks}t zHS;9E^q+MVAB=I~<8fdl?udVBfk37e(Wcbj#;gS9f>M;-oOSaBu317c3c1Nxhaid} zRP>p&AYOPy4(d-6#llehtVb}ARyObA_XYi`$k&)1A)%uxj@W=0rQ=}CvDKV2QVJ6- zFtYa0-df?mv~PH<_SSFQ_2P@M$cSVPx8l!Ztd9^V7_>G*p^TG|NW8!dWFA^59rOSQ zYs7iJUmv0}7>b61q{B?+lDH@ZxT^0L12iaB!VcM9RPN^1sJa1+b3_gQH;qVR@oRdY zx<9i@5Pn+xIYA1*E8Q;EZ_qZ z``P&C+)tjV!;VT?>c}*ZuEB;Q?Agy?g3E1On3chB?2sC5I8T`TT z^$5HlM1XD(n@w!zJ;L-+b9wBJ9BIR(diJ4QrCV&=h@5PZ_iZQpI`KBg3`N8yCDpOo zA%2*0WsmQ(-D;%`Dz>&SN1_h2NBg&_ey;i{ErjJ$KCuwCoP$20Bx0cK>kv>#0;vS6 z0`DdFLJhkQ(SshOp(l!<4&%viUM-CIXF$OW{Y*F@|E$J+iT&^S;WVUE)}CV7RLa^q zesU|ph~y|VOSo;&*Z~^E@r8uJDN9%!JO~9)^)n~JAK^zn3adBTp77SJDJHqDdDdgr z8)hRn|L|Jjqvo__Tnum9&*^i1xjNBAQ2`_kq{rQWg`XVrP(at3c)wBpyqm3mMH7a* zlCnTsP43#Lx@LQvk%!(!BODkHAs5F~ESPiq?(T+jYu482hE)66w4k z74yhR8^R$QxwyX#!r+MmH#Za)OV^}qbS7_H%D@Z;-y?q$HV*Rpc)9-a7(}+a*-skT z6GK;N0$+%s3`YGG8^BVmYcOuk&Fe)y_qk{|VVj6G7eXf*qi6%$(MrKd_F0y{+kJmTi8=`-K@|34`kRSvn^n%3X zfC^7ZtVQZOD`(OIbd~W!3W5{LLP=zd*!oS-Ir5VPI6=8KoSf9P6q0{==~DM|1@glA z5B#=Sy3T}dz2FbZ5&pn$8I746I=fn~V&=3DP!_QykFOEdgqJQVIhadZV*it|GH+hi zExopKbxFJv_Aoh3uQ5lBtro&BMdmm4S*k;fms`1hw&HRtqasI+Clh@cmA0nO1F@Eh z*{z?EIG82j4c-(4sl;|Sge`8{!vQgge`fih%Mig@Rp(WU&Jyql7uv@J3$70W&=b7W zXl3-QY}d;2^5KwexLS#^u3}#esOk7~s0|+`amKzFIM<8i`rq<73tDcP_EECB=*!M6 zOGgt-*RW)MSi%&l5QbDsoS0_*XcIdOMBpLb@J=GJacwyMc&R!s*F8SJz+ z5>~=l1v2A8_s`>k6FzqByh_J&Yi!6G!-f9(18L%T3dB98Qgdo`30HZOq8?P(J-<)Tj}G$F+wPRT?SA{2}y6+joV>YObp z3ut`!5yCV7D|79dO0U7$;AE%a7~Ctmkl2kXP0$u(dUo1iqN|rw1UnL7oy++p@Cb?wmN6!_tj|pOZ4K>q`6v9?pyc}B`WcoWV!oGtKzo6b{;2+iKkTxfT2uIw z&}QFv>HK+bz5V8!-@C2&sG-;xq4$RLZY-DScb7HU+=(V0??FX9XSk`7`XaT(m-AQ{kf!;NYZp6Xs-MWuT$ zW_KpfeUyNGL2jB9nc9?heK-3^EE5QP;4edpC)X@ICu5J`>5=!{AP6Ah1C+)RZ291~ zo-!04-TC_YiRrq2bmxA%f9P{IoS={fr?v^ht4uTNsm;J(leQcAX9q+r{mG41iu?g8 z6{G6cF(;cu{1oGv`-n?-S`p5srqPNR5GhyU95z<@+$@%tzs?v$Ni{2SE5ODz1P6a_(^ zL(imclVufmvqvmZRQJO(c%ZG?WYf1ypzm-Yvf51B zufEv3WZ{J>xN{4~B^JlBLsOHhv8{z*fJ(G&6s(UqQh)vTe>KHdUvzuV3O<|&#GoZz zKNh9#vrn3OIbT2XC)vlf5C0aX@L6Dg$|AU}C@QO}H6VLLWe!5W948#U!{*xRt6wK8 zZXf)17N*-jLK^9Ne)l%8Z9y1mR1SP-R<6iCsegfqo|sntanG~M$DG+e)E(6We?a!G zSv}3}S7-Ro|3J&+W1Fnp@%Ec*j9u8C3`x zixf+h+7bCw^@0nspx08h=BNkLiQnx1@~31f|E{WPdFm(S`d=34VBNk_iT0KPV@R=k zagnF&x>VG#V7yYUE(X^6nZ5M$(H{!Q_L&z%S^Jr>>)!~)pv~s%=O>L>{}DKhR5SSC z_jkX7zeV;L%H@k>ep$C)m`&{K>8al6B}tO@bX(7t zp7lw{83_9En;8iFsfu-7n)?OCo5XRy{%zg^keu|nl7Hg*`4n7}md(@-f6GNZOX!nw z-00^YP$@8d>dkgS{U9kMFKx5_eJ`2axG|qHXdv-%gyMvEXK@)(l0D`V;?pqIV_`Np z36h|?T0*@gFs*|-8^wRhnN(1lzB{6wlN0KZRI)*=Ob0npqX9VvfI6dUTwsQ7z|zQY zPze_dL@R=cJ>{k{`35+4uwc(v@L9X{=E0|0Ic{>=%ETH67-Mjc5bsD znexOooheh7dOoo=)corygTCte^8=K+-g^K2?@=hanPtV5ilOQsLq~xGCpH$O8mT!T zEE{UsiM)hZ(-I!17xpI9w{G>7L!ns2MpJ3)glITfke{3}ELIr0tD=1~XnGZH(4-Z1 zm*^saVeWLh?@t! z6V*$g)5C1DC_^Qe@jrOO#a1Xm<69Jx*)5_Y^&!$@6r%9~4#*Fc94I;)1J0s2^5Hd7 z@^TeuiWfUgC(>9UFKE3S0#L;!<`rx5+91q8npy*GO^N*jO(qX&j#PmLq9+E3WKn#lQ%JymS?2 zTZAg->gsrQ$(&J$L#jMl7@!na_nja?ZSx`?&3^Wksp(Sr1V{MJ!MOf|aNn}4(~T!+ z_qqa>g$D?Oqnor)X(y0WpMB~ov;Jdrzr?|7Bs(RKFh6@gH9mIoztxw~7eUOFK46LI z-LlLjC2SIcUXh6CF~$EY!;DWxH`pS(-+W&8)s`Pt+7#(=Fkb0>0@s*S9o}1Sz5m|Z z@cGP4Wy-TwcFmz6kg_x6t&90oJjt^ntZUudVJT zSx{4AOy*0u3x<59p9H099uLKtRb(jmf_-%FQ{)ND9Cpq6%TmM%>pq`Lz(%1^vg$i> z57CH5aloez2E)PPO%sXhE72k$JI1=9em>$^-gqTRAuW!a%=Dnp1mKR}wHcTeC;~(* zwg}AWSPOVIVs30JYNb!)NGiL5?%CPmM7#yjp%8)XF09$v?peipxlN@!;%&v8Z)=wS z6S0y7aKMz{Ghl2PSTG3mjpX?@tZsTJ(Y1DQQnK1j-^S`=G#OJZ`Y z+q+5UJV0NnG)yvqb;}qtG8>IW_eKkWw$bg1mY-H`FD4j!-o!rq2ql`*Os<&#{YwQ< ztm{Ryd&Ah6Ni5vQRb9y_j!L`x3JYG#>ss(iwdE!b8^K^JbaxPS&2+b#96LKxKxq-V zeWofkJq~JjYS+iL!KgB}@DGDRz&4vTrszq3Nx21hJ#dL&r@)&xjtXv5_{@H4xR^sB z5u#p>G>M|ulZ^ROGEAqi+~>V3n`f$>5+#yy^vgTqAd>b(c167sIm{w;)+H5|5}SI}kpkA+<}KaSjt1?%^Ltp$e6i%L0tSKNC)a(CS#ZLL`x{ zaoK^?Se8V3AFQed`}wv%d17;}H~4`Xc=xAEp97iD1s?1)Gj81Lxf+(lkZPn{+SD&7 zgO_k_ibgy(4(FF}-lqJi8>iHR)-_ox3Neldm2t%EGxjH>Jn9zGjpw^59Y>zoLp(xW za20Nf5A=iwbL=hor&CfZhHI}H<^xA{w#BAtik7+cmLys6ZlSlW*()39D;TBAr< z?GTAH;x;D>p_6V4tPV|$kh(PO^}W-DnYmVpz4c55ORwdvLU^(+xJ=p(g#2rHv%!X# z2%N2TGqE2@?zZuSoH5a=@6b$?fk*)x#zeE=YN^ zLzrV5zFXp4UeB8y@E&xh)H$@kgI&j)U1G7zoq|_f6{#L7XQ?`~pehlEu4pNv;0{uE zCpdl1H>B^Bw(aCE+3{rv10kt;5(oLC;=UA*HwwqFNizQT=_7v63( zav0i;t(}tNn6y$GD2vBjdwu)$7p2cf?o8d&WR5902XA-Qzq>_jwyUU(lt2^gQ-6{t1IHgeI(f4A>eqkyQ?hfSt`Nfad{7?z?w-1{uYR3ONd{PL z)T?e2q%1~3jTn8RRi<3>BgoGNq;{1KvzIinrh5Ffy*;?cG}av=Pg9yYJjj+yigW+T z*b*f5(mb7HfBs@;WH$(=ZZrSw*sr(Bn~-u+s~2(*xz$5TT&tO6|Ji7#$YzMgQv`(brlc`q~xAhM`nNyl;vd&ku?{*EuGssmjBL}iEwPR)4 z0LzIC#UOUc#pA)``;0dB)KyI|VquV54R&+~*o4nf6)iSBM<&`O8-w{G7q(VD!j_Xb z;;7oXeonN6sDu=q!6XQLbe)(-K^TW-#!v04E_>$rxr(%7J~p4bRQA%hCmYrH9i)Sb z5L+!&aTSLK%#@ENYJXl}yu-^TTS1KoU*rQG)1dhjqtV*KTVakO^SFbs0PojU3fP%5 zC!KM+u5Ejz&>dplB1BQgEMF3y*FA~f?fIlQ#`N`C(>go=4ePMyj8q2_fmjuII!X`qJ zgZ=vhU4V}d{X60+1-V*H>m#!%RXQ6aatc*EA^0qtv0H8$h!mu7ri06UE4)Bas=W0N zE+@GgpLvx2r=s?U-X!~s_Nu@A>VMy62){x#0n~&j6KIEHa44l)OMeB*HlPy3k=TTQ zLY^opxCP{dAGd2nSmK2=kU!`os@tGjzql$RRf_6KUkm-9)O8~n&dzzHqOYt zfNUM*5aLz5kI9i4J!;%32 z3raHWAd)*UK+5xYfr{JOEX@es0AwBoF%iaSk|K1!Xa)PE(WC-h+&ag-<#qtJsV}yA zGyBP;sEklWp1fdZJA6&owr#>H;H^PvcWc}jMnR*ts`Ei0F%nlCMsS?)=BAsoe$3J5 z;J}ecG^9eRV#HHl@dg%Bxhrz=JYc7!UKGWMZCi2DX#8$*otYHPq{IdwyY6;n6{RAsPK=v$KgA zEMypx`5+mIULq#qo0lpNn3@#h*FJoisTmZvzNmuF*_17}fHdFQ%z7k_8H?U`;%wt5_-CSr2ac~zw-NmU^iIL zCa>?i>fGmQEpZR`*|GXxm_W~OR0?|;dc@m zM?$N%Ns=2%$AZY}UXHti-_+cc=JRr^JSQk;jUVqR zU&zAmBMTz{5o|tCkTYGKEOg861(Ok#nS^s)9$-)%^* z#I3`2qSEkwvXQKA8%e^-yZ#(HFh6q3rZ&iNx4JG(a*^i;T*D4!V`*SRZInr@Ntw)Mr|!iy9;mVwi;A2 z$yuBvRRW?kZ0IjM(hdtjY!!ss_^DIs<#6Ti0L2D~Zo>+NsvA`yn6}oBXrGf-U0q#~ z9rN);QhFFx)mo6oEvpPCea>|?bu)F;+TifgtWB<`w@cPN;D|MDw*=1!DOj zjs|$aCre6Lj)g{q!WfCUs>~2jlBm5bCMEIA19^2aL>^q{(58>Dr;80ey8_?tk5o;; z62J#83cUaFCs$qsi%Mi~S8TN1k2xgm!d;w-Bps7cYyFtRQa6RGUL<3gcxXmF^OOY) z0jMxbhb!4)%<7lDh`|OHL<|@d*lqV#$O4hk^VDqsIJ>GGtk;%70h% zzIr>xAK>3ThTfPWw0)#Jci&pqng{ym{b}~JuicK?ID$Wa^bp8NJ}nhS_WWtkk~oqv z?acT^kNK7G9KK!^!4wSMDBV0j0+9rw5gLSvN?R!xQDe*XGgff2%um^7;~TAe3G{O6 z(=(sW{9D3PO}!NY`BeW6v33g?f9l)~FH%nw={uEUCUR3GN7Af>!l@q{`2#P^`VSrB zI_Wfx-8#k^s6H=vQumV2sm@x;XV>QIXVq3mICNAFu-wKO+b(5@G5<)j5Y>?^EE{Bq z{i~%%EyXsr`h?4II}NNp-s2d?t-&yfiOYRrTK z%6+_>7}`x4=TencMqLVAZbb&^ZJj%E=g{Uvw2N?;kt$*b^9wwe`m+(~(9{LL7OY_o zZFpmm;AUx?_3!)O1?3jYk}4CR7?XGj^XO~PPW;`8Br=yVA`_GJ2(dC~Ne|Aed#^tW zldkEPgUBg1*8!njj{LU+LYsdN<5*WjgJ0R^1Oqu9Z-4#R7V4_g0@@V`s2NR^mwn6U z%Vsp)s)}A>BgeiGzjKsv+exM`z_CEiwq!!<`nN~r$aa(TfOgP~Toim-@0Z=em4pM> zw2!!>rS}Jh*l9bfuf&ZhgN+U4wcO2W2IoBq#zD)K2XodxEXF)z7467gK-EUpZTX`oKndxbbmwfJn+#s{2B=+BlUP2+)b` z3s5CF?UW&kx+1~Q1Ck^UXu3EwB6)HWB%k#*_D%}XbSu0Rd>#D;qrDnR3b`-L$Vae4 z*Uv=oB(=W7tTBs)VS~txY{v%S5?8u}{#x6)&Scmq=YGs=l|#vAHpR#HAg|5JOzJjlOY@?FZDw>wjA;_ z)6@MQFe(0!DqRGF%TC-Bv%-qR6pkz^tYmXUYyd5xFSJ-c>%ycS^s>l~u;bF$)!2g` zk0(91%^MQOK6MmT!6^+r1nk59CKpUuCk-MJEFnTM?Lfht>2CIrVqBX&`WcD?>t}gs z1MZDAe7^o|-UDC3d)d^TTG`yGzAxPqD%tg?+&hDOg}<1(pHAfn;=YTv&g#@zh~OcG zUb1tO^KL-~j5*L)!4D`^NcBiQ!LYIW zNaII|vQn$-0GG&OR@trZy#3wVda&5+e&gbC$Dx5fbsNuiK<CXORfhI3VcG7m15pGIgu+@YgQSmTtlA7HmX@qZG* zqz@}whl?ovKm^wpUb4d>O1iHm`>b(%S+_pHOq%c@`}aOYbb9BbcIi)n+b^^`-v8Wx ziDZ1AiIWc~BMV+Xzx?S8X*yQaYlM>Gq^2E;tgA~Yi3-1A7Utpk^IIv z^E2=eN~%{RJ{SwCWO<3Q)Mb#hcyWAwTIaH zP@KBgrWm5j{p)-(&YZjS7bZAE^&GXUxOzcMAOC`nvYw;E?so~FO4({CvmvKq!4#yV z=8pKk(Hq03h6ZXoJkEUXm_jo5v&~-%l9Pc*(?f2?XX`XA0aL)2UZe=UCtaQXFMsOH zFLBQ8zhDSaXFnNeE<@B0aPQ^Zm38YwcTSnOdC*23!S(MA2f%@;rF^U)?MPk}ZQUcg z_RsTEdv<1v>_-rlcUATerfta4A|KmdqFG6yD_1gtx?p3UpavLqv*lx?5+jraLWlP! z(xef1c-b#P!=96SiuI0QYw_sB6?YG?px%1_z4xz*S;Yp3r=?nmU(eK}N?KwD;vV&& z7-27R<|#dI1*?lHAl2Za%a}EFzqACnTGX!q=iJL=4S)!}fuy5hBzI79fnA zqllJHWtMj1CcNrR+E_u@k8JOMyk8nevGHTz*G%wB8lXjLmEn`I#^i(GBNLt$%Z(U> z7pDM6N`KA->%R17$0w|}Yx?Zt`pm~V>;G$(Y>Rs9{rBHuTeYrnC%q4RG}?Vs`Qw*k zsL46E?4pum2gR8Us13ieft*YR!11v#gtuL{WjP^XI-zEd zKv0B?vz4aAX6Te?gHR}2X+mdmj&W$ONT~A@t;K>=U)2jI=-_JVg~OJJh7Pd6w@ z%|bPGR@Nt2dHtB%Dy>)Tz3~QDoK@UHOf9&>O+*G4p@P#yu~ldSrYataBkj=XCI<;R z`Pztq&(C9ngR9smF59N}XBgnthZ7LHz^q_Vvv7hPMeDRnatVQbx^pc@MKB45n#8yX zYVb6s;dva`Z-OhZixU!Z3mT`i)LU0EHpQQLfjQ6yD*BWiolv9jK?0!|v)ms$qDJ9& z48L;jX8(PtcaR`rK)C>dh^PQk*1b~|jIP&zOUcJi9sD&20{ETURwO*aB^9m+MQ}(W z`T_yrf1__l>l+g)pe3dgbsgo>Map?4l4jJ|-YmEXyjo}sHpUDWZaQWEqeF;kU6uOu zW3*dmQtOaXNk*GX*e#$}n4`BtWmEr{!MQA`H(D=J*ZxR+#NH7V?)@8VmG1HP1@LzagL$YtcK}s_kMJ;45(H>b^NF6~u-?FfW2F;3ME?WqMff@MSR`+%*f*Uu2()?BL#V)=;A>kg+%&Ug#n3I-RWY|*!UxiAoC z>O1We3*DFt!`c@%T79FPLJ~@!uR(7pNIpjOI@^U`3?QcTIx9upql&LXef&``uCogA{4A6UOh!$E4X}Oc z;4x5v`e9eu>^4Iy{~#>jQTg8o`)7XK9*#>g1B-psW*9|GT(jX&9K$X^Mr5V!00E-! z8cWN{9k-*6lzLw@cZ82=k6~&Z=DlS|fZ-SZcmP2PF50}eho->mUBba*G42SCps@^S z$7V9_BLPc@T>w*wcrRNmr15g~)6VZ2Gin)`jbz&|@uF^9IS7GwqHZbGt*KL0b+Vy} zKbARk3s)+%6c;w+Sp)^(%HzdidiyyE`u6KD%FL8^(g}x7(%jkSru^#H zd-rsctB?5J?TZxK_r!@R@7!>Mmr3i=}G8`FpAj<;q#Id2Qnh@`KQ=d`D#_q=e{t;5r6mzt2IDbH_2H+F5Bp$mJgGYW` zpUBtsg!Q18D&$6jZfIS}9EgC+#o6HhqC1T$PKeh0WjCP|a*w(|xfV4?9VIzRMsEU^ zsQQA0vnrUCsX=HIl8I0+saX)7-*WLRjFtcMz>g|RtBi;m@~17Ecdnn6f=KqUE%`%Y z^rutUov!#GSrP7@xSkS8Ux#V=69z4l^$pk4=~(0zUW@p3l_JvTT&cc5~tH0u6*=auEMIR8svHnZ*(n50R8<%o!d%i?I0EhWRkG z`5~cK^uzi&YNWySB#3j(GU!w_lN}Jig35;>sbArUJ`V{7y= z<-0J=jHAI={DrVaPJqaMu9$|D#%yxcdf{3Z+K6WPGvf2b`evziF%l$Y@q9FJZP4c= zjxk{sdOq;|cN0`tg6q-;5D}#~>4|AHR3~lakxcsFT9ay5du&G#4+5FX$OURPDLqT` zLo{#XbK?@`M%DHl=`7yzH~~pp(wy}^(&pK#1a>JDAggLkk?#0~A!KAm??c}wwh#6K zsoP5|l`gzA%7k-8n>5S59V;TKNEr@0@vZQC0u{Fz10U6~onLp3YM9amS^pckl(Q=} zUgTd7{d`vX!MPBWmL$jCKjQT||9goDEllK4cc*m5~2rK*k0(8}^5YdWLt zdsG*Tt|M)X1RTTwiWI7>*31sA3-rQRDVWS8&h>~?xLo!S&2%(6J$S?g_kI_s0#2fL za3Gkf7@_c_s~&yKXFyY6HW`Z0fJt=#PV#wUdaMAF4^aQdTf_E@A(v;&fu?v{w%e18 zk|b zLcIt*6Bl*Cd1gzYWQ!g}C149`f#BHh1TZ$>tbgu)^&G@u@TDu7ymm!D&okTwn`VkZ-qo=X9x*$%3;>L?4+U)tSl{VR#5$>DLb)s&9&i{#IrHzuv_ z`XGZt$eg1Jyg-_P&kI!X(*?6ueVT*W4zD@QE5^%g-h-K?1?Q9_XxbLaWeQCa2U?Y3 zjM&PNhMClupdojMV!&jTFTav0CQg78Io5ehKBAUU0=aEEBSO#9(w=hax+PW;39cty zd~vU5RBs}s1Zj+*i;Fhrw>21z;RAH0^Ws7IQhLATi@YS!YVv#7oGEXF*1H^$YF@XC zw1p)mPthDhv9W+JSz~dUi5}@VT^?16Y!}q%xtcGc!~n2x$e_6>>)dt3;-DO&ZNVX< z#EtfILBL4llfsmI$Dk)0^7NaECLqFw3PpzzK*XmAPq4|Xf0t-y1{i0v_>rIGRPpw? zI7Kc?r5i}iPbDAOhle z(Uitemn~%c@E?0IK~FK~&e>w)R^d_ON|Te#78-z@+az2LsEcsFi@b0fP^Vh9QR<~; z4}3SP3P6ZHH%-MqmvwH~X9cuwp~7VuyjSRS76*T;5GOETOmDhD$>% z#*Dy+KB6Hez0DGKIam^sD_m1oc7cbNUZHP@Su^1=Txfgnx^fPWS%K`CG|WuS0WPXL z+(QWHRFX2GVV|`jP*rDPt*l;l)NA@6PNWdSw>yYV@!_I=R^8m6!m6VlR>Lp^kRxDZb zx^47@s(INqk>2s135-{b2Ul=1Nmn=&>C>ti7YPOm&eRWy-Ec(k% z;k(?)z%t-sJ*CbgJ1s8Jqm5>psR~hTyKaS#$>DH-ljkFtQY^$tY~{Cv5n@Bg9>Z=D zxcKzCN-^zGgCWTg^AR*Asq(~xWcE+6yt}qbX!%V=CJeVZ!1&KW{0!hzg)0PqPtsFb zEbE3}W!BCaWq5;}Rs#3u(H2RLG;*i}x*6h*AOO+!Cr?<`Ac6~TLwJLqVo(zgt>$3v z7|@edu#HGf6=R@5Jh5e^t{jW2-U|$b)D+Von;;2d+{)XerllIPhd80QlB1cjl7wHB z%ZT(B!DG)s7R34tocbs-Gg2?6=XRd8J-3BBI^@Y$*-GhBsHMui;^0`@#p!9M0p6}C ziyXpaW-vHT4Rc1lw*kK=HD{i-*H&mootd%Nx!)60R$r+0NbiNM_w>>oSRWE$p8(Jt z@0}Zt1xcEXT|>if3MW~Fal#-gp|L_8H8;SABG4oOHL6vxZ+hWZoCxE@a7Qeri%cuh zs8b}^oL>&O9NQo&Md|<{&(Z1IhUX6dqu;F@vU>g5T-} zt^&0ixt{;$-+gfNplQ9yquzv?^7=Z2ME3;Z!cDID=(un?DiEsJ@CfHeX%h(vxS&;m z3BaUK=|5^TN75|_&CF6cXiRRV>Em}tbEdkAaN>R5*yd(lZ05!xps}0A2I@){ zG|2iu;!Rp1byO{my1-OhT7P+nC34>J9w#1AYb7*Y42w)TC}ZC-@s<^bk zjmgUv7wo?C`&1)gCB1P6mGhe?J)62n?=i5i6VH*TNR}(zn$M?HD<$y_kJ2XbY)lyB zA88Bt`nUb6i4MrEQ*7fXZCTH2u_S4GswruEFj;j#=rjeNrOi;dDK=y8fe5ZRdn!~q zqJM%&*cttiPX7B7E}EDgZELw8JL`WI3_bFN=~G< zgy<&)RnVtIe@+_&s9@71iCV;mNJ~0Jc5O-#Yo7oPoZ7$8iYDiz5kT^y+9pkS>V0!b zPxoU#89=fO1q|`jjI0Y%3nC#u*!AK?!}v{ikJtH|=T7v`a84PfN1RpuWO&xH%I;of z&PD0d{g-Mj>Lct^y{_p+b@Bi-oci(*X@BEM5+0x%xacbl*Kgsoa{9)Ya z6ZXINs4Dn3-`w?U{sWKA86;`-y{S93#qjO}pXPmR_#)~hf79FV?fNSEyBB@nr0%+U zanUENUhA&6-xy!d8{^^mVdDz?IP?E~P?!8QZ@u%*oATA;*T4JT_jbPi&U@e4`TF<1 zyZd{-_vYI>Uw`+VccN?7YwP%8n{d%TvZk<&J~+QYglQZ;l=J`Vzy2w{u^o>y|2~wJ zo0k8%x{vC!em^2}+l0R$-+BIS@tO0RP+>b>Gkq(+8_%`qD_;;UTzGnfCB+lzm-?}{ zb=2Em4(m-`j2G7fA4u2jmXHFkrZ#_|W!@E!}Z`H;l<^J=*%qVSSK zOzY}qh-HXB^TY6slt{)GFg|o%=Yn36IB>{8Igha?RpHl}bhK&TOgeeS9}8<|$TK+0 zH`~^)FFU?C{BFkg-0?M8)Ju7t0j4P8W`M)N)Ckb1zO!;h)o&eR&dwj-H-^BA|DW&R zxUtm(_L@sD@UK45pKNmOFKbZsT7&rNW3qe5Un{agw7)^=6!FZ#HX#xq-QkyTi2|;p z4*x;=ov-s$@4sB^w6B0DCZdiI*rt4)d6FVVx?;=pv8u`ivURM3hC5*>2`$cT01DOa z33)PMy;iE^k`b>;ZCIF$L{>)(SBcbych)m6QB-!tp6DlmSz7e`6h}h3AF#calvjzC zst&g{uKIqkVSU0<1q?Z&86#ET5en(D#(h`p5&mR2F!Q=B#deOIc*d~oO&20wVtSx5 zG8^!~$+iYF2<85THs^V96H)FhqWp}yI1GMnUvFExi6^&4_0x`$pq8yXww1D4Xymc% z?a(E@aAM!Yli$jCk{u&*c-2{<)d5k}eU9-;T{$#g0Gi|^6qVd6?D;m?z z0d4lbOReVC2QP;C)VF;+sc=y{(0_mvaC!GS5A7yw+%z2TW!IvuCa%jZi30z?ji6Fh$CjG zW$5vvvL(uNT0bX1A{|rB-RjGJ`z@FV13Sv}_llQl?CPi9zBwk>#EuO9=@P z{fS$ZMur1jG0yWQK}ZzKuB;v4-=t{-d+3f$+u--)CyJje$nM~Z2-5Ph+;SaW|Nf$2 z=O(gz)mj>(&Px~%%rve<1E@5tP;(Pl?q?&U!ac2$*pD?{Ij$RXOmE`LoA`1RUp7_< zw=z+JsLD-@xu1e%+&@#znZ*)vWC%z|JPKikC2iw-U}^d10VbmxKM$7qDp6p83{+>> zV3@5bP(mvqMIzOin@Drty>7d?qvmzf*u0|}<&$50^+hqsp4!I!<-g1XDhZHXe7-W( z3Y#S9wI<}LMl2GhmXpx;J|X=pKkQbGgs zFIvB3?mhQjGjoqfvPeZ*X0j6KRxu+ZBHhi+?&rDZ$hf(f?wd&SK#`^~lP$+$)pz5@ zDGI1UDj>zl83kE{sR-{qip?=%70#$3ikwg8(PB0GCc->eg!#eOrVqObH4k!bJ`%o* zem1)~r7PJPnZAiOZ=%gfv{`j6|5(mg`fg&)gTEvHi;oLL zEljBwPm-s{*}LP>++y45VY_uyFaN*)x8%ARUb%e}P#!3tB)8a(N^EMS7#D=SnY35r zjr5sX_7J$O5KYcI>%D7~mt85FW5JVIyxZq{*PD3qC7Y$pdtH5&eACv_7^ z?kx4EV0GfECG$1`Chl!tGbl^WN6L$N6Gh%ck&`I$$+%KcV08C}lWy5Pt#6{p19`M5 z!#O8>C6`9l9YB)IuOk&m3nd#jpXJcW9jklZ(V?8bOPP20`xEvZ)#~Z%b=|&Nwd*F# z+&!CZ$+SFcsAN5rnw64k(JMpw#WApz75JH3mDHRDlZ{AcH=?4ABDHeXZJM$TGeAnf z&ZU>I4Q?XLL&3)wpp4LP7dx3mDrrx9Nhw0tqDSy|!jf6lqOsv!fMgDH5T{i?F?1Ct zBf}WPO~iS)DV}a4YTZ+6n42K;P+6I9h4v|1zsV#Z(Uv)Y$#`3eT)qi9Z-UNA&?%DI zs?XjR zKd{FNlI8U^a%QmpbL8P==_5Xqx9Yxph@i4^1iZV|>c< zn6JiCcN1prahVAQ(?#tg)%ysoZS=`wHL?jPOO8mHsTz#E^rRD77F0ANj*}i@0)wce zf(kx?pS%9(#eH)Ak8pb4u(PJC^m6NQexQ3ve6sgxD=DQcXQZz6A~3}QqqGr?^B234 zNu#g1()&Tzj%QcbZov4e&VdTE1X8K zI#D^uLf>BGp(=mXJu;QW1*u462)fMO@ZOb^13>hg<2jyZA@}oN9^lT-7x~zr4ttfzAWLm?dV(5wwYBwrId3pA1%`IvLfgtt< zOd0$@Xa6=_x$S?h2>fLpiSsy1FZ57A$&0CeA=)OeEBdKck?=Yqv06X+s1~gV=b*X1 z%&za0l%m79T~2)`a^{xTSe|O^b77GZkPdVH#-`U43%N+fpB6D^y>iFqDtL{rQ_4H! zQ|1HGZ7|iTvC*y|an5a@B*Q^sO{{XZZ9kc8h`P$Uhh0j$l1ekjp*}t~h<+83=ATdsgC;S!|uQ&iRaH+GL8#va1X& z1Pa9?7v;JAghQO$D`!cbFGr=uJOpRFM?m@#WoffM&)w$clwkDW&ubwyFZLUJ5Oze+ zQ(;!rJGt4wi^D4g6|b@$7VH<>&KIX{e7dke^1^E$=W0i1vQL@!#%BmDEtLGWfHQJXaBl(Q?2G`ixwzT&~7^^Hyg3GjMypp{gHB?%Nn4i z>FdhcUibKoYv;#aNiL))@0Ej>zFCJCaS;Yqc9uYhh+##$J4mVmAG?s4we7pHaiKel zYus{3#qkxtiSDuFag+&!+=wXHyI4!gI_t*iad!)xs_T^>W2&*jB?aGv$+Ho!Ks+(emDGanRs4n>FLl&)U#!dii^r;uRWE<=#=HE%wp`Qs z`TX-w-LYQc=bwN6Sy#RN?RUQSoo{{q_FLci_IKa@{=4s*RF!?vhqws+nl~@nwCq3Y z@7#Uo?)P4#oOa=Xc-m9kkL2vvMRoQE>4o`et3le9 z6slS!Y0Bt@I?h5)F^Fe)ei#Sa3c?F*lTA1qD8hBUH}+(xT5`oIs4@?bIdTc_(5|f1 z*|W9lS8N3-P%j3${#}AGW5WzK$+W+NOoDx)TsgaPD?S5t7EH$?zE?+vf|V3=8!OeGwn{sC&2q3%>`0c4&RBQKSl@*XWNbQ$-_*znBbxrII_ae> z;KdG&y}Z7n5b5k$i9VJux?^tWA;Xtnm#sjFYnJB*6BGRcF%zoHo2ILStbDiB5X@SG zk%2eV2@)g%$B~(3i}?aLIFO{XbI5c$+_f@DE#he za%+!PrDWxFljc&$@B41k4duFaZEHK)oEsmU@u`RnZ%f5f+haH3N8Y{Uff%UN7v0el z5nGVy6+UGQZAi*mIak&kGlG~kH+;;!n^|n5OV-5X1Y#-_8YEUQQxV`+UKjl6bT}d7 zwJbh?JE_=e7Vozep7T!}9p4Y>{$1Y|AE*BLG|y@*ig(_6>)W?uzmQE#3Yi2OCB5D3 zyza5gm6W($c0x$mW4TuA1;rF3<|5$;M)@FyUd_gP%?w`?&;QUO|6Wlx=@#KIHynEw zYuVOI)aKD7^t{t61_DlinOW;_lmZnTj!?j6wh0vCA;QbnA9=z4LDCjBjUOhn+-zO7 zdr*`Ar0fK>CG5ABLe8Dj!9f)hlp@fQIP3zNW9-`zfF#jX#;1E8j?E8NC>PWzyre>l zL2e=Nrka1|Sc;eKD2+)c=~5DrlAEPqs;`nrcI@RlC{35-^z5Ijlc^m=lb0gcQ@TL& z(;Ty{q^>40S;#4#j1&#)BcpG>R!yHv#d&>Tm4vI&ioRwk_GK>Gb*WCgx3~)X>xEdL zE4aI&bfeP>-r7wF(~~M5!;0!vYh6wZlOj>)B93kqPNk$Ogmm6(?-mtihG z6eLFOJhAGfxCDj<3(^Gjtg~lO+vBR&MBSiq~b;w|n%-IV)gf}Tzf9Qw%UO3)&&VF|X&HE6WFQ*=$_I~7D zC`G(0XY$^YluVCACTveufHDk2-)%%vW2a-c6HZd{jqF;X{@Qaz75wa(=@92UNbGC1 zgOaHTAA%*iQ~dR#ejF?r)tC5ebBt0o+MAW;vvg?@%CsF%1}zH7X35=u9m}rytrOZ1 z@>UQ|L1JuWa~@&}C2X5kV#ziJOc|sGRwZJ2g12GguoFP>Ox0Lb4ozaVNoUXa9@#vF zY6$(C)(6oMe$3Slq0r6*#ixB4-jFrDQZ`*5S10?%M7;vldx<$Llr@0Vj9cjfBaM&% zC{_^Ysqk0yF-b2aW^ccE9Ze9Ty+w*5hX4ZX+#j{4$dT(@A<&JME~U=P0;rh zyz!}EL<%x~r&7Sl$i@(v4<% zzDKnV4ds8(KjLh@xLf%|j4c zx%6e=;%13TQqV=z3Y6}axnZO@CsEK?-;qg|EmKEdqY^gnGs}x~A&0se8%!9X4jI@B z473^G=LS{@wj*LLXBD~23z;UhQA5;SK&V7f(N9}|@EzU4xQ&D1L3& z6SFN93dqpj4kC zA0;^)J!VWYo&B!(xa&t$T7T+m`YZ=}1_liXdx|*uQEL<;K*TxH!NL{tq|XD(9VP?t zC;#zJtMSjj$&>}(E&|4qlT<}&Ec5Ph^ERU7KJi7uj-AN>FWr3Kx`s9&C=YcmId|~* zSzWg4x?N?gh`zBdxfsazdY`P{8&fDxI%gvDHssd_W5=K~y0+rUq%*=+RD8;;K6+)H z$@>)b)SiWywI!P$`q})*aPATrKpVTLG$&XLEFY4P_w-fK>)8RzLnQT(k zv#TdN53rOXnj&~3=^N=xPR?Zn7QEky618LKc-Ys`C5iq*GvRr7l}86Ykr%DQBieef7|I`avLx@uU2U#I({f z2_-4tRyrO@H8NMgd@oc_0m~44AWETSRdo#S#q;7{#louew*l~(embd&MpSGVM47!? z3Wb7I#77j)6LoTNij?J0 zz_k*6^=s5Bf_Ahz4=rCbwHp_b)U;?|pcJ0W?NJan^c0}?69Py{my^F(%CM&mk2KCW zs*0b8giHJqgtRbzDz10uG8yhYyQe05R|U4lZJarQ(R!@T_xzPNxbNr0M^M{*og z^S>u_X@FIqBL>amES#|^HRs{WaA3}vGUJ63SJzhHasx-v>j+v-`A9B-ailcPsX&z( zm2=2R@pFfhpK#+)6fv$Xm6{D0Cxj%qqQ4h}^aO%jB!LOK~5;E zs8r#M&q6VyU{h)0@!vmba@fe=>J9T<9X|ByPHVN7XuWQq1mYL*?J40p3)!&Ot))i~ z&dI>HkZ8;eDJ|{!6Icg6q95qoT$q?kSz!_ocDbsJZd0hAdZZXTgEkhdBk@yO(0VVk zTZ4&FHyyB&wdDp#A4UjtgetTpRw(Pt=Q2zF6%YDdC?1#niq`MJ0|l>vF&Foyrh&(+DJIimnO0 z&PeKa_Us8I3R{7L(Ooe2ZCBITx9W(#u&pc1qVpK0?p8yxQLNz|*xUrvArzS7W*TPA zKTwFGvcZo6>d?t>hO7-wWD_o0>Q_y-?SUftbiav4+sh8txLkJDuj^tdl3pD4BLMUULf?d?{?` z28*dCH0S)05Edw4=7hfCS6s4EH}JZKczb3{CCHmFzpuHy(hIR;*cT3KB{83~0)a3W zDEP>UChwC{s$qe@n%>Pm3$Z*xvEmaZtVh7ddsia2>ILy*jB$iatB8oP*(5{@ug|;9 zt_!5WEgV zbF>$Q%IyUl=fEX`rF19PB??^SfGGgzELH4vrl}Zt+1AHOal@F2^2kFz*ZCr%(Lm%Y zEJ{sKln8NY*;+vnBQmjyPZx8aXI@%nVy9DkzodMj!Swdys@|xGlah{Z`HZo(37G`w zX5e6hy6K;`~37?@u`8wDzO`7-<%eoc8A9?&@OxX-FLqe ztPOo47$TsE7c;B4OU7YwK`|?>%nJZXxgf3Qs^?eMEEYHDSED$PbA?Pceb-QEDtwCy zjpaaO#KZK}2+`<0G+fss!H}*B7e;*2QlVRQ$H&^nW~G`yP;?iZMLWJ*P9BA4z|tTP zOB-fWsY1idBuQ!tfWQEXXUb~*BA}@gP=Jkp?Vc}0ZSuT?O-b@}4MH?K*ZLxntgALjTGovr-C^)ylM9D;xA;&sep8yCevj}9 zo$nQcZUs6;E7%VuxWPh}JWO9tM7ex06RLRSxm3sY+rPL&7;+g!2T8nRIcJN6MHuZN zqLAdHRo%0T&B)lqwuB6^sI6(%g}ZK8G++R`qZKbftbi&jufl^Sv@A8vt1;fGBZuUG zdr8zLk&q6Kq@%V{4CbqFpz>e36MUUZ2%0LBbiO`XCN78}CZz+=4$c_x8)0hFKq64S zS(kh_%2Eh7o3d4!BQ>)jf$ru^bj4<#%wq$-z>Pp z<2nbv_&E{S{>w^X5LXoS@ZM}wH-^f!7QVSJAF8fk5gYvsdi-K|>s65$zhrjuFG1E! zMq3~usz>L5lecoMs)VE5p+g3VN!_n3Y*;6_f>6ozY5+B9ghqF)xUD;(Y1Co9gg7=1 z6Tk%vX7q^*ncmQoCk|8zf$!R0Ba?Sj574~e_{2C8y7sv5OnVj}t{I&xM?yw3qETQ1 zNulUQA|}y2RXJBDuy;tdy2@>XCLQTj>;)4g>5AnIGnYS|&I?X|Vd^bc z#im^rpkG!QqAZHB#3^+_*v^)YL%f`MwUh<%sK{6-!#Oe{irB&bPln>jC^f2sZ$7Ee zP5N0VmLZ#)i9Lrnk*-ZaIT{RZ89j)W?dA9Izn((Ss~%N$G6G(!>ZRfM8Y$D4OW@m& z&=*i$?r8Y0i7kGP5V;Cr#+pkCpPH)sh730KeD}hcZ%YVId%< zz)qkE1J^}pCkA3Jsg}TRWInFuoRd-#%t<(&wwIQkZ$qjQj88T*J#aknL&3cO$($cQT6QRayk9uwN#)6QkN~O{TI|t%rU;8s(B2Y!Ir-v^z(=|xw0NIS;dPi`DNTna8*uMxP;8L05FA5t zE+5ISwk3eteL5uYLYP2NPf1KUL}bA-69bz@)%@zh#fF+m(NEvD4^YVjXjEN?rFK^ z9%e#80*a$vGFWZgj}2N{Y-z`ez8r8j);^GuA-F-x&BitSwMYxso4Nr;AS9*85QRe% z1QQl3_D;316TyOHX2JBCV!F+gfx!6%tw9k=;eRN5W!{4DKhlLitMh2(rsO< z8tQSWQsMPD1>>(ve2b<(Gaiv)Z@H-6oPD*$P?WZu>z2Vg=pOQ^}DoR7RD-R5rK+aAGZHi2XtWK!#wQJsVq@ z*^c3(k5Q%gyOWW1^qS5qgi3%kE5@286~Ew#066BP8pGa#;;P&x%HF0vDJHv|+i3p+ z{S4{rloRF#Hus^jOrat9>h4Z5@P$Edw)wRpX72I5FkQ2lXqAZxr3bpj5@UGN`p+06 z=P9SOKH>4AUwUUUP;On=Y)9|9wNaZ3&oO(ME4uFMK(hy1Z0dnsBy zrL(ufKetLbuCO9>`RV#s{nx!&UP7sxWMX$(&4^LlHAj;UR<825rEhRGR)Yvp@_2krq2-FZmya}f5P!;jJXF>>5-6Ejx9;09m*C{tH}|YZya{Y$)id%L5gCUif#-B8Y@?-r%GfOx0FO zZwcj`qCQs~FJ^1j3C0;?7K|C9GuE{&cjD2TAR|H1F~@u@S5ekAV3`P112s!*LCjJC zR2hqpIM$`$yO*@U75B@&tjdNqBioyE?o)2+oU0B4iL$}9`lA7}l(im1)Wt?J^DHK< z5HC`zO=3(y^ldFb%Xi*>dx14|>m%0mmheQgdXBhz-<^ zRzevLw721C0@!Auli=1%>Q2yes9cQDCVe5UbSB)96GnHsl1)Pkbhr4V>|>t$;HWMB z{-kV{XMb!L;lA?boR7vY%jL3OAAE%Qy~T`KNO*;qQhI|voz$ioAgYZ9MJ9d%%(=?1m{x0NR$PRWogiEUcw1dT2{9`_)UW?GAl?#J)c>cg|mb{ohMZk_0*Gm;l zItRR_Nef?}hrBN5WtiyyOj!mkfkNR2GcdkXwj0_D>ow{nQ%-a}cuDgmnJD(s&EP$d zsm#)r=qCGoeDz_ghl#IoF#6PpAI2FnnlwH|+-l>;Il=N7qC|A$-M&g@WLE}{pRgt9 zq$JODEo~x$zrt7*>b5HT)`*KPKA*b`&YR5q5?izHl zchCsE10F&ASMXO>XVW22rxOkfJGweBY?z~^OF_Xxz|WKy%BHULQYmOG=v*))36E9H zNFr_|nQ0&zmWj?rj8A%FI#Hj@nlcJg+t~@kDXx@SF^RYWx4S~&r$f2t@PyvNt{gG) zigp#Ex^htN^L|t|nJ^a{}GTQFo8Lx8Yj0Qog25Gw)ARLG2; znKRJv`Y*o~U^p#q1*(f{ML{$$;IcvuKxgHjk0^*S1fKxL(u(wDsbD{m6ToYXo2}Hp zM_x2#`WZK>v6Xw)OGhzw2Bq@s!bR>o-eX~3&pSP*RUQWZ(Ni)00Y1D@&rKk3A%F{Y zs6a6s&_P=UUppn4C_V4@8`R?rglGl3T!pf8{*HVp$FF2>?o>5~e8Ef24EJhCd)VC{Yt^8o@*$%>gXWVBQmQyDMVFKY_y?W$A)M zN+!$3#p_n|)9LXEQQ!GY36iaO4lnTjBuV2CSeTOx`tn?Pt%E;*)j;OpW~M?cqR3jJ zID1AnKMF!eO=d#llxs(Ps3gR5g8qPCZIv{F4iSnD@&hk#snRw%*LEwSKXFL8RvbIR z%fOk%vs0o3W|J3IpNu8Xg{mZ3=qjZR@>n+TEJ9lKMews~=P_#m;L>pGvX^{~-Zg{c z*ig#={su!dYNqp!S*e+J7GNx9g0zYHWDrn^Me!X@v9Z|JTa8U9thrvU{Zd)+f@IqB zNkZnl^`3ced)`12yP^$hRv`upiJtfluxpX>9K%CT1$Gt4I8jH?>eNEn0~*LK1T_N$ zx6C+!h_q%91?`NXKl?))N?EJ2Uos3H+s|C48=O?uF{LIh(W%RcV=g$<`CS2atYzsQG+zW38%B2Bs@eU)=@)^!iL3kmOzGdWP;xi~a8X(w_?CAeRD zp;alZuWS_Kbbc^xr;|MaQ54JTWNB=EpT7Cau`>s_WGvd6z8he*qz4@_Vrq(EKv-%C zZI7gI&#AqQ$r>h*P10X}J8lz=xRj4)5W)=HWmUGJa*?tYMTndbCO(hO0GeCeU1 zY$P9$RKX_w(E`YGcOL&`TztE(VYUi!plNQp0@{i1K>p#e!ypVHR3!yADg(IQ~K5Uh+(Z5BZ+ zoUZ#+HBk{5QiDuovQ1V2Y*!B&#oW|KqmmOROby%G!;xXfam1pPiLhn&G?PKcCa6!( zR)qWf%oG?v+orYX=?dB~Ax}GSUA7XPMN@pDmC>Z{%_!3pbhv3)N-M#GUwBgbssiz^ zioHyxJeI0Q8H+`esuDADf8{Z3QV7Q_QR$V>8o6@)5!%+^_ zMx@mhD2`2UJ5jyRWTZ)>vx%#*@xkqN;oMa{JIfh=()C*=ju2Gk*|TjaHQ*VAWp<*z z#~Vj`eq0xyx>Y`!np<6NLcPE5+Ob{v;_(;bYUQ7t{f}HpZKrIPHN8{mXuU!71ci@LDYUTg^|Teq7uA6@S9(eJ2zKf*O}H{^n9y)?}>CN@`5zKz4qG8M*QS=D|247XKW#BB4sxhUq0s+2A*#I`o#6WcM8OaCCyvd; zYiqwhRp>s-G3!kzujDf0zj)yO`s?5RB5~IK_I~;(sVQ?xJSC_~BE+5&Jh%UZnsANu zj;%+p=-v`A>SPQyt0AYf@+7Fhrc+07R$wO9wq?`QO5Y{m=@TBFFkMDw{w$RWBHQDm zJO)Xzi9_MKQ}x(5^q*35LNC~AxiFp6o=r;X#-Jt+R~^H%3m$i)$Jmf3xLY6=v~I#s zHi`_-`S6my467FRt{T(>w=CE@vgA^WeDh-RTsXtPeKB#FWou|k@r+LNrN%~DnN3$; z6GtIs!L$RG)}8xADPkg<9+I`3`yn{5gsCYqOoX|_Jm>Sp(yROQY}j5($IVXYaYKy~x>5+#r6j5_b`!3Fk}1pg;ZM>fK=`9gnmfzTS$tIK*@FUMTE%n!@7;kFQU(Mjhb zYa_u?e&Ss^Us4BByIeDxFO=Z6qCvRW(CAH@yrv{rE<1*JYJDdvSn|f-)vsjV4j%u6 zM~#Q@jw0k z;>+y8`^V}=rU&z z>H4UXg6s1pV-K^UEN$`-nEwRMoy#`A{qFa_P3h6w@4oxa?XNM8k?uas*i|xA*0olr z@S&6(5*{w5hrDX0r0 zcr5_@W?T!EhGFU;sU}D15#_3kPWiZOj(%BIC%(A#Fv(sbik?rwciy^v>jKCg$sPscMS!&I5SWV0T*q%nu_`O z;PYC%2k?t6?*y(>Ch38N4SbDL)`-^@;`+G03R<$S&~m?eYVT3UmjVNU&hkbIz5-|1 zU$!Lt*W}Q;g3C)*PG=!>egZ*(0oyi#|5Ad28{PL;UuiO{8&&CEYOS-Hqu{M}U1=vj zMe9WJ)iT&o)p$=mreFd%LSh^Y(Cy2a$B2?6Qw5-O8mNbIE%XP4q+^Z2yuXt$i&M~M z6e;Ga7FA}2$%raZCt`u?dX4|8s@e|0js+rh4iSi_? z>?{9dq3pVo5{S$KFkgRLiH6BlD|$SyCYuJ|tXCb^gA!USW=+sv7f{oe$wmc~ML4QVp1atrV}h_6pfnvv2OcUS7MK-;%jJn2 zV^wc!9hD0JObG@p(#>GnC#HP&;AP4=89b?gtK3Zje!$1ab-#`=y3GXTsw}h!#*wA* zrf<*wrPOhGK{8y<6m{>ObfZlom0>Px2qvB-SC&FDou=PcrJYiyF)6wWX73p`boS4K zp4bV(dof{DhNa9KQVxn?HX3}1;&%B+li{MHMs>DuaT&{3l%|5fidSL3Q@|NDnnEJ%{n$Ui;Ctk!rGX6 zBQ7Y=s+u@JGIJtu0orw4wKE@lO+2;9hc}_N=kk-LNONZb`wwilJmWMB9V6LuSwGc6 zH~mdAz>mpC(iQNFkIGeBA4_@p7e9}{l-uMePk2hL*n*C3Nyob+&-)dk@l7AOi@81E zSzU7~bjPfGPDKkia0Hu)gqS5TI9nT~+}6KBg;p5Em$esRcF!tXN4*TZEO~gc5D|7@ z&R&uW=OFN*&)oLxpZogcPF7za+qj=jP*1F zuo20K=?paFJwK43W?ZCGM2qBghPAszDto+ZG47=kadA+2m)ioa}aVgc~%EB3wxWsm*R7;td;%Qq|d9|wnv&Jix>)ie0facA;x>r|6J2q z!EB3JBtzK-)wR#cc9rYwB2O;O{DpQxUh_4DdeY@QihRWR79+GrF1(rPPyXYdR^y+4 zlZzPi)>M|nYaztn4#t-)AcmN$LAe(CZap^Ey9Z^?vKD36P*Xu?oyD!TAy;77U6SVp z8=ikYxFQQ#2ONRKmPQ!jR0f>c=Q+SWc=150Sy8wZQ`J(2YlJ|Fy`kf=*{4WOT#F}w z!8D0r?rfT}O?rS%g^$HaU{a9*_By7B_K!$3sU}|_=@n#cfA!+zFs#N+Dt3X4H>%}E zHzN=tmD5tKP19fa(YzAqntLy=Xmy}+NRng5a`hri)-fpn1udR2H@Oxg)PDtKi-xU= z5~pV@Z;538wIRo2a$_s=2WWvH!O`(i%I){JqMEr7as6Qk{aUcu_JCfm5rAdT_DLRPoa_XU~)Z*&W2D~ zh~68H6T&*in^1`Up~4mysdR~(l0OVeOfN|)54O>c#t_~$aZ#4*I01PG{BRCAx$x}f zvJx7;^C^e$y{sod+N^z&C1WsRs3=XBJCb(u9+vTGE8sdZ( zU6Bg2!6M*pYQUx9`cVf6z_1HPslM2NB&~U0v&5v0f=m;~h&ns`0{+c@=GFf8e$R9R zseZ*W-4z6*#^AdV8#_^7M~KAnrj$g52qlqI_1CDvbOjeb^7Vjztn7uPuB}8+POAlz zDG{k-rTGX(re;Jyfk|~H#sZLhGns%+W+M%68Ip=9tHKw!h?7;Uwn6@6l*FT;ce4Q> zpD>nA&3Odw>+?3K!8PiYrvEsjEU3dVsrF!6F1l$Pix)K3s+-9?Ay1^I9#(^V8E4;*G=IF?H zI2{|7vYHa(evRQ)#+#qNmH2DfI3}E?({fHO9OeC(1VHyOPS5OGM{RY9HC)!d=^_Pt zK#eI95r{P=(~&3iaoOq^E6-EjO4$x?hY|=6@zuv>Ceyk0M5WV49hZG42&rTP`e#8vZt+`MMBVfya4hB#3aX2yM4pA|KGO|vAJJvgm=v^f?8v2rSHlY+ih(4*X}6==n=#<=~vKmM2SZj z%Fxnqaj3kiHTaKu3JLlvC^QvulCB-$_3vrIG~o)=ry#IaX{4`!-WK{HknHRd!P|UH z&%FaT#KLKAZaKOK(`C8n${fW3+uCjwd6M?LI3lpLU-(zB5e8QaBf(Hxh4I>$Xmoh{ z6tQc0CgT&H zlC-dpMuTxKl+-sT+=XAG|0*IJOJO$;qmC0!56Qusao_9|9s1n>n+?^6>kX%ac`ztq>3`z3x?UhxtVIb4QpXEqTE} z)lDH?nZ*1QEp4Vg9h(i_Fp2_`dtsVy@@IQ=SSG`3T$c-vmNOQ=j>O+74Y*YBdLC>; z{fL`cbdAp;qNR5*okF$SpU(?|pq%rGtvM&3&4nlwpVym({fuq;1ZJUJJ#K?vu#>K& zO7P7Q(DZCzz>QrRQbvq>h1iMXlOz*W3>rBrdWI}La`ozkOrB_=DxGa3VpzIMn?0{v zl|7G8-&`iu0t-x5(PQ3VF71e7W+|g|qkyMa8eODEOioNK%z28LQdp4=`;vpS7QiIAv@cIW!K^lkc`!#Mf6kSK8UdYzQ`@c?Kzwsb0Zl6% zg7=yGO4z4UsgYZ6f9v~i-v-YIZzcxiit@^mgNDj5CzYF)QH>T7WY{KXV3L^ieo0J` zPrx$~^|Fm(nJIW#IgD{|eQ*hZQl5?xU5xeVa1z96Y!o`|5v}!MkC@D+R2-MQ4yPc# z{D37Hn`SpKlg!rV;!wCgbueD1rmnIQTHKSQmA4l^j4k8V(#lR%+bF&6qESSekD1O; zGrLjRkSOOeE_l#%n1Zv&dIGREXCNU|3f0l81y(rV>ZY6nSw{8J{k%^-Gt;JOkr9(E z*fd=o#Hr9S;OyDB?rF0J)x|OiL@KRveX!FOp5=GG<3JwV|05gOMUs(=iDI@Jr+9dqc8<&BNS51>buhtniV2qKS=X#nS2SY1gKJA z#btI|RuS*|z>QDueA;=H8H|oBmi0mrDCzo>tDs~_N`&f$*b%ne+)b`A)w!hIqrqqX zKt0oWI5h@p-WpI;G%SVk38@AV12-^bFIi6dw30GS(0ybb4W;0*g^h_3OuD1T)*Y32 z{7*(MpcZAt84{0`-G( z7-(YpN&=kid%fiN7i~k1(@rC2&2aoDydeZe$ znl#g#Ei&3I zPl!e`M^u6MSKTGbm}B2<#M1&?F>y$!05`%#ACd$s1}8oPl!`+ zo7T$`_8YC3PT&PiQmUI&V^cGiGP0<)nIeBTWuO-WKfcBnWo3}8(A!Z3=9GG!o!?O7 z(Ikp6Nt5MkBLv|N-b9Sj zi-pm!oo>l~BFl=xtmhL!OLau1z8v9#=~u_KugZqqL3Q`GZcpg7HYnIynLYZrICsO3 zaNI)e?s}Nl4=I9WlDDR?n*vvpzr!w;qc|l3{e}$M*hbA;zvI5-#mp_7?@5Bqh=CC| z3^!vV=3PK{t&y2*$`z*!MZMP0$r|63EmXB6A`;kFmffVF-xMHWe|QGS6A8&7VdK-j zgf+Yqc{!w2Mv)hX#+MTXjs)aAQ8+~t3@Kw@ZNI7}4jE&fi0ZDz2NM2pT1Gkulb z8R4=_;FIGiv9QYj!tu%I`JF>q89}V&#R}V1p`FalswwyrkokySV%^n&t!z%Vl%(1K zYar80c4+vNr~I}DMRUK}&FpuJS8qIm(%H(y(RK*Z{f6zJFf>l!8cOTvi@=8n#PDe= z9erQ}v%b1Bm(|pk#u_(}7UrM*VDf!`#+fu=bt`*u)B&=q@g%qAfuROMYR{ z2t&gN`9Ag+Y|fWsSL=1GlO3F-yuwS;?t2!Dc#+CHckOq{4rCC#H|afz3??% zxFYqX?iCd*Ky6E(rKe|{5{SJxV!0Vwe3?YUN+XPmZ96)PDz%FCz?E9;tGcr9MP&^u zQYlP{-Rw~#)VCUNZXFl7Ct`j$>!r=-BU>Rawk(w!7a!!WU9-RxkKoKcyo?fKi{vjw z8XJaMNy|E&{r4z!TX3b}@I*^0g%C-=yO;NS-`MswsXEvw%p@SnKNNGx=j(+UO9v%q z?Yrvit7R@iz4TU%uV#<5ogg`~B|2$@6WacZ39O~`_AdT$S&LfT2vEVM>DEU)bXEgA zAfBk@3W4ZI%jZlz&>;Q`ai=Q?PFqpL7`jfmS;l^sJ`mJ1P|_71D!#7M!mcc#=0;Q1 za5R~p=Xj*Cfp84!oMLXAwj{2K1q$;diR==pz=$GiZ6X1~3T@|J@!czi;wEH%E5Mmr zp4WRg85D^u1F?%36B5y}nbB++j+-Y{`8Uc`E^Pe^`w@)f;io`MUPQIftPd9y#7Uzf zDBcPlEap9daPJ#CBlqw+==2@9kf*BCyq~r11}WLg(79q|zh}E{CC^$&b{+UvpTqes ze}xW~%qcIYCC*Hyl9OuY%lucg!&VJn0ha+7jEO|tNe9<2BB0YN5Jn3>i$pX5!-8Bn z=kHy1tub=wydNg6cNjgigez33h`H;vs@_bCLnAky5;JFuhLK4+3seR9vcf>Yb9-s_rQR zfRK$)+^g7>oKFpVO2%M}sWxsH>_hj^sjw{> zV&QX2fl=~Gm<46$%_uE?joEdrqm#JZr|%56*bIbsl)HFD$u!OOAh*9gS$ zo>ox6lujpe@~+rg8)xZM!|@Ww<)><10eP1XW0^?1K*{p#89hM8p)6)(pD`c0zr=*-oX42s zie9BFoDZ4vHBt==*uSwQh5IpwHF8?5{*0KWSPQdkQI(r|C@1Zc%o+#eTSf&ki$Uyh zF%2IguYXp6}!0v&QM8aN*T{8ym?ZQ!v{Di>s>acf(MQ2U#dyZ z9E~P)Ei-p=JPs+3xUv9CPAw??IV)Anpbmb>7pe`aT5j-#zLR996}FLNK&m|QK#U6U z21xL_6~8BC`SA%3@4AS;*bE@3Rh18yvk4TjcW|}2!zmg0(pE&md49UVn$Jo)xeN%W z#{tX;mgQretwz*JW}$AH5|d~GUdXO68-Y>`#b`T066A*wuyGH@GkR>+Uw7?zF5|MA z;+Kz(4tp?US1N3TzP%qBDO%8`IZl%UxQ7}~t3oCYaB9={~%1bO3P+*@up_C{ZBLXg;dOfqH99Y~Dr2FQ%2HiWH_a;Z*KCGCxFi^kuJ; zU|CCJm&TAc;4!RP!_iG-I;=dDn24Nvt*wzMfWV&-&Om+0zXSL&U(W`PDC_O##T3EH z2^LhKBL-I;2RN6&8LiA_ZX3C2C0GfCO5-aTQ2pXY-})$X(^qU!l%{Q$M2J6gW(=CdXXJ2iN$7)0YJdq5EprpvgQQRxo@?xY95U*Bh<4lbQ zzag$f`DNp1qSDE3ct~vEal%y~_TWI~S=9k4L|GZ$d`tEwUOQd4rPnWbpTf?sT2$s! z7tX;`clJN=QQEOpy_LVop@67wh(L#T!D*a5TaHyAgrjfiPF1kP*-C?ad z9XkZ^Da=hpjqJjcF%fm#XwgEL-$5L|yQ=N0#^Qx0Ny``CYz z$bn07NhA~nw{!^9_QKBN#~5LX3J#ITQhYkgBA3?WTL`%^D^&&lurwu}%6G{o)&6BW zOt2ba=nO#5T2o*P6Wkf(1|r{|!Xs3UWw8hI5#ax?>rmf*AM+VUTP!quindpjZo9+= z!+Y<4{W#2?&v4Y}fAmX^nt!A}`pX}@@$Pru`t}?2PuA`F!5hn`rT+ORm0eVY=D5C0 zAAHa*<)d%y`y9RDVR_oo#&?fVQz z-m^2_jNf^_E%>Y^leBb$9IDZWU3Jc8dv#+G4wh`BU)kHeFn8e)i{0 z`rUZ%SMuIU`ZWPti{j_=qN6usbSnQFT7Z`rfZoTH$M|v!|F^H>d4;dP_1SznS0}rw z+x?Z-{SfQ?^6UC|!oV=Y3nh$)fneMEoCeK&#rPseP zE~n{Wia&=a;|lryYxWEt%dR$`s(jDP%Ak_Y#$%RBG7O#JdFXL~oa5$c9OP+y2qN&Z zpTi|sjc5}p)}YDo$qf39YdDNOisSebgEW!4mA>6gaCE7`Q4niMT0J+1;2?*9F4uRd z&Xj?>I3kk%pJ+JFG;Pdf--Jg8bj>Eu73T!QWbT}p92B;GUXr_U#jku0&;$16Z2c#) z6jgKf2f;w1|G%ld^nPpa>1}gQdx(SBn z>-_;MANMA8r_wwC)1Og z^^X&QOEC6yV~@?A=D`!@o=_USc?O5FKQlFYA%QR+3yjk6JVdwbp5BB&2TOQUh)_D3 zCsVj4Zl-lolVQ0DgDx`+dSqE~?A{k|rd-xHG10+NgoFhL1e_Z_0II_K zWpEMKFd$+bZ;I;t`;_^7e7ZStZCIQznL=B)UWS3Ku#QXz(XQy_BX`{OPG^nEW4g5X zuIE4E{zo0x+2~Wgs_P%T@vuH}T7!7(`udo^@Z|m0pYtn6XW@Ncmp^#pao4Vfx_Eq_ zU#|QQ-guwK6N{g|URltkK{hc3u zI=!@Co!q(q6Ml&o@dt05)OQ~I20gAPbrP8C<2!(5XK0&B`CX_$RDqYh?)?7;&!uW(C|37<;LU_d@-0 z z0l1@-QFy|4UfhcO({LVs5m~5j--N|CVew5^d~R6GXDo?$g)NecG7*Mj6fF_3vzOoO zCMbLLs#r?2r__B0%U?)mBw(Y2Kl$bf9Jn>xcFOn^8J;L3iCBJqK0%#!H%H{qZ8+&} zqT>UB1$mfgt>8eEfR#u*OcF)FZgeU z1$?=s(r>vITu%30p~s_Gi(*wXuIsa}dLe;hW_{4RM_?Y@nd>FCJf(!hYhNirD)eGk&Q53YY_{Cy_T$~uy1HI zGC5q3bZ7%pF;jx-Tbr(4gdc%lcj?dIq>q=R%CXY1ubkeAWlTm|n@XpH>J3+{q|1RY zSmlKl;CeItvQUZO)nfAMT>#THVOh?gH~qqEI5zf#%d{ewB9kXd&rf4&W$xw&lVo6ms4({fhfh)=j~hO^?e9_8E~xuo3iV$@G0PQ*LCw2$nZ(#UYom<1yuFjFm#A#7k=JRouj;Flv#-`7+F4fv0!yS<{Z_?5v_`xh+j4}?R}{g31D%Pv zaN>xcIjS8*>m#@mZ_$9ytb8pPvVHXwFq=q`o$qr+0WsfHu1A8Tt8SnJQ?6>S)35HS ztR`&^-)*{~T-UAz7O{W=D?f)d>&I76r{fi+2l;GGCTc|)3wJ?!6|HBX){v7?N(4<# zPSqw8wk>izDQIt+(Fg#dSY0yfAYaMB3*}?2MtVuwW6JXv-w8?|@v`sgAyJ62#ftDw zH)zh7>|ee!X$Y_u5)1BhOWMk`B9439v?k;Bn;YjpEM*02EEGFIDCD*%C)_Jq7FHzx zHw>Nh{FmLjjJenz_6SPr!S%Y3+zs8TUeZjH$Ih$3rjn2zGRRs~fGgDk1QHfE9z5bZ z&mMGV|DLqST9`};H5|^Rsim@xVN;EblxN@}^`Bg{S+Qo3{LB=WXe^+wkTozF%63`y zOS81WxL*2cV$GMjU42Wxza7`|uDaPa_MW%mFCQ$YFTR<61adhiWxJv;RCFO!c;Ywg z9M+?*`(j=8Up!W|o_hI%H{Ql4+j33&;q%Wwb;o**pMU=OXI=IEx4-?Zw?BXTyWjrq zcfR$#?|jz;a_oyf#6{TGym`@2cK_ae=k7aqzkj8ap8Par*oQ^BiZ+*GE?9wGY2`^a z?qgeEjpANOQO&96$N*pgk&`pP0KJv`m=<4P(Gv^Qz8!|DFuW{GOrh| zNfYl@Rn?JFq^Zs&{Dh2eTiQrMY2Xad!IYZ~YR1|xoQ{&%+=6T9wz+(Hp3e7y_YVR) zbsv_wBA{cbJm{**1H1&eQ*l}RrzulCuG>0N9RX>PGliwRL|3N@&5<&t<6C3nYNI&p zk%@jhDxe60T6!BBoVuzn)%*n!mkX$tJn!#bpLmvjPzYO9(oulf(Y$8K|7ZhJsd6(@ zroF0waLsvij!Mtbo^=dSro4u@H$py^E>2MN$FZBg7Ib?Zz&cEe3{_b^DA%9QMapZxxY#t`~$he=B zXaClkjIhUck{SNe+MfFb6LKxmg;~xQA1^N&xMS@uqwN8VkDwz_9BBhe(x1{wd}VS* zG5*Q4EF7QFMqRHBWjdh9rGgn+C0khOMhjvMJ_dv)M2^*yGkRGw<&x;m0HZ zNwdoFJc;~B4y zVz*pX8QBV)jOcKFP~#2}BVQ_QCdU{UOE1#Skq6l!?n>>x#OMqW;kz?5asI0KabHFZ zW!-LTa6sgW!XHlLpe*iQa3sCpjk~P{`yD%Pf%r>bM(XN;qzSts9$#`k zy+*2V`55JJR@AX-^>IWcRZk3BW>2C-8LbAl{p-_m5rK7C-C;Pzkct;TP`wxU5jp{D{Ld zKml9brtCYpy@^pI07p0UN9E~_1HsG0NNSP#>zoG0RA#cwwE7=MGVL z%Jqy@Q+GFovL~H)n4x}ZFLCNs)8A0ksX?#xJZ!tFJQ~q7)+f5^Yf%d^dWn$x-z^?A zaz4;=76@tXGa@k6NvhzBqw?sqVc2k+>ww(S?axF);n*^$xS^d)pHuCqp}&rgd*12_gmuu48a{qB- z+SF<(uML&Cg69>#=yk3nt4;XxZ~pV&|7+dWxh&z&XLfMGMY3^Ob6>gTDBMUoijN$f z0O#)@;Qgd-%dx@!`3N!Dl70^u)k54XQ>O8Ddr~%#eA!S4OYv0BwY)!tI>Xx|>Mqjq z1{Yy$l)o&PaY<~Vep0alWG-QKgwj$bEfz&uP)1k2$&~>nBL&u4Xav`K#NtPtq!0qT zz)dmyD-8Gpyzs;s3qm24JFfWo@%R|k;@P9RvS%Bx{()Q8z`K?{FW$KcwNYDKH^c*w z=@2v91n)kiE3ET?VLT-Nh<*W0G+-|HIGmQwxS9j_0=WVTfZz&_5!&LrP+*r>Ip?Bk zLN+fvPT(gwsSGeZYzBcGW95WPHLNKT9QUFk-GTdhnKqZi1J}gUlgTHuxM}ERY0Hku zu;`wlJ!~nal1fHH^Oji!tqX57qLV%yKghMg*|+_;tiC8d>gdT8+~Qx=oJcD~!?1WF zW#YBd_)^i)hwIHr>1+QtEf_74rw4ao&Hi)a@9bq!%t6S=$s!CxEG7vUXI*uPs5RG4 z;prD&=(a_4)%FfMMZ!d$@@{fhDixZMi%f#+N{ngH&S@HBhAG_303&j#S!%R9O!kK; zC4glMBhs9-FRW@nAy@o?_Cnu{8?hNWDv!9EjB?p4=>WfwRC1G7rwFV7(JGf)P}hvD z76Y}zacy|0U{sBfW~8T7e9F;cQ~bmYzbbCQ_2jjqpPjhk@d;&R?W*XGiw~R;o7HXc zQSaOrD8@LhH&@x5(A)36`z|G*X?F#|r-+FndH0FMBQM}8A-J%jbXph()GBK(P(~6F zu-KIh|3WtbMf`%fHVRO+{Q<=sX~^X*A;o&PR&@|tOCI19vMlwbPz>ica8w0+eH9@i zlId`jPe|he)0x6B6oPe4&ghT2vEq`3ZneC}@u9L#oITS5?1fF{pG)1qSFmMkOYyNq zeIO}k6l3N9CTU*`Y9c&7g7%oft#0860Uc6^nS96Wj7>O_5Wbt(|N$ zYDzt}wrLEmv(${x6V^9l9N`fXegJ}IqZCs(BKt5M7ogI=3mBJcla$R6QCcU-FaEfGhuMMCg(2YDX;=VGqFrr&)?azWx0ZL3#?t)LLalQEW6PzwH;tkGCiKC z^y@jamQ&Cm``&HMVEZYBBb=1U|F?c<52t*J)oxSbRSqcO*RpN~`(} zH>eQwvTZcCaP~~Niz5h*Uqt1$=Gc+J{nGLS;h4uCVIR(O=scVtZ^%r$L_2KgXqjAK zC*YE;%ZIYR2UHa;g*=%4bU0Zfx+QBySEBR|ahw~!<9WypM_%=@My@qppJ%EwRy*aL zz{VPQm|$hy^O~vqHXSg$EkIL(IkAR8Qy&GU>F~SEWfR&+V&8%;$l=Qd*TYzTp!lvN z)681(6O@;s@Wt~eR>wuKPCh2Li1`O)gMb9c1nS5fOqhFW$!@|moarNJ-^fm0xNesL)?ih=$|O0s!fFPRD6-L*O3%t$f`Q#lwJpNJrYo+a8a z)r3ZBjT}{q7i?M8;D(GB$|)46*4rM{!Lbc?D~8xt&iK4%WC@Io_;O?c4l<_PT5Rhr z>%%lcPgImg9tQjyF}0iX2tb;pr4Yk~qE|p7DSJvrnkqPq{Hc&1(ix9QWrkn9btNrD!J*?}hPjI{Wh<{zLiD$RoP%6)* zD2xD`2%~CrF#Mzrgsjrzq@X6^i~Nu(gz#Lbi`~$?c}l#hCG!)eII>)|b%wJU#r1Rq zbdivG3guy#0ljiA=$!aB44I*1j*g7ArY@y31z7>*wFvW8xeibj(opu*IX61(ASnZ} zkOT1GDa%;KQWhOFL;5TGNX&X^zYA89Awr=e7RenJa^Z9a=pNwRro?GLFb6IuKW^0P z3R9UnW0^xYY^e@ViQpJ&%S%NQGtW?M1kyPl6)++R85^&Wk90m4*zG~UsCo?-Vqeau zz@SGVzLZJsov671vG00KpmmfyknPPG-B>z+{LvB1%>uhq4nxTukuXOxW9u8NJ#9R^ z=^%^`1A?Ve7|FxfayX#uCcZe~V);qHY+wk<7f0Q=TmsJLZ!b`TKc?euv^q<-;=T}F z{MlFB1#TReoOcK-!ceMIW4K--?KFDJQr@Ds917HQi!F3tU3Jphpp1q*I`!K3B4{AM zw^Sr1Y75$^W6kf4Skt+Z#3Z6Of8MG9>QojbnZ1>{0=`xeU$HY76js6@cS#vRq9`81#a^}MykaME)g zjZKc7^9<;p4TNX54lLXlGHrCTDkf3dq?Sb4;>k@VDw3Ft2sguTxntwKa;(A=xF&JK zhb`BE%FCL52$iGB^bcnI`YHiG&r_9=UR*gWqB^5)S_0|#ZG#4!`5Bvb5i0UCZXEq&o3mkeUon0r9N2Gs(+l}oa>3vhTz(Rl~Pz;?i${mW?c^y(27lK~E<;ddsW zxe(Dp z+Kp_SL&K9^#>*+05Js@f`I`{n=Xxqx?~H<&qil{e?-{d#A*!@a(%FkE0XjWM4L?_5&)&M;%15f`g(Mbm(BLUAjZ zCC{2X1ZA5bD0-}MdqT=H7Tdl&I2*#XK_x{Xtj%?6;ZEi)D)bIOVJ*Hm24Wj9IMhjN z*Kca$wuT--0@}&V&l_O4{Jd+EI#=~n=BYt>W#dK^SDFhLXM0ZK$XVltaT8jLU=|hU z_go)$b&Q}9qmRH5<77=~8Ja`_gQB$KvXw93j1z~|TJ0Ea+mupkapAls!FCCy(!7xr z?ZFin>oRlVMcg&JShf#QDyK1x?YU40zOp)jxT^BQeslZ`e?xBrc zBApnsWkrcOj7t_&; zIEwS9KiQ%|*Gug}Mdt^$OVJ(U=j@>lw#3k@{DvbuXudw= zWDrjeL7^hrwTrsv%O*2R>jaIM*7#?015Lh5T` zY<}7ny&G6Q)dhY^ZWt!Hstt~mRmn`WwNezwuB&!vFF&bWPapfZTy_H;1tB-^RZU?6 z=LegUy6MQKNn;${6A`47{hphuXhPx}l%>EJk;X6i@`C=$v20Cj$Jj+gffWYi1Pfk` z4f%4xf-(E^*sSD)${S;Zjd8z7lS#g`1L!HfV_Tbs3PYZ|rzLVUN!p|x9(YLtKt#a! z-pVz;P&EpFS(y!UBWs)dqRG^*S&?N5cgb5^OkL8#lyLh+oaG1;Lu3mwfub)*Re>2v zywzDG0ne2YB?XsO{4)=a8zLZ#SsB}6Z2xENAe0Q?sZp}qGJHm-*#SiZ*j2_iaxGfG zoit8U7oeFrRA#)hV46!6F`z4D=TCvAB_F*C3|Xp!oV0E^n+%^#c&YW%t~L2m3d!~) zGB!k~M3Q{4C|2Wv-$8qsnwzo%X$?@VQ{jn}s{E;}+n*!bLA3cS-n@W3G!%pkuNS7J z@jKwe@T=n*vpvH##7~z3Z8YY>;)ng%b`;1D3?IJ?BsHCaT6u<#y8dEV+MYAd8=60( zs>4qvDXWgdJ5C8MrCl$0!y#5C1SL2F31(+S+T{)5DKQfi0VAE!5@~=>cFAo^FsZ8< zvPl`SSfjpAyqm|UWnRS41(*|Pn+^5X(*QlZ&D?Mvy>!#wjlxC+j@tx^j0?DXOkoS= zQK|+)Qra3spMK9AHC6b1DpLY}H6^B}v{71~dj@i^hxPryQeZBpHp*;!v{%B}J?l0N8Q2!((4e^*)fc(A3ipa=MRsmmYxj9u zcT%F!SHRCzB{T2ZTZw=#D4!7}0?&6B?)# z)4*gLJqE6u*zF~_Ept56BP^O#XjUJfBEgWP1`rpZ1gePEV$w(QfW*nX(Ev!rzmbE z{a~+@aowsp)kv1CQA3;bhz+3*IX1#II2{%Q)rg$mTWz-nlTj2oT-deWUZ~9@ch2yV zm0SxuGcJ;)BZIeshT0<4osUciw}V(C?ItH0U|s-e5IP|TgV7&)!!h%_oYW|hxsm7p z;a=!bt6=ykY6{j3XG0&lSrCP)z)C3QY2cKI?(3QuCmuG$J;&*`%#g`r`i4Q!8`|P> z1|`(iR?dkB6fM~Lpyytt?)b9!eN|#CiGgegCR?l-TD;4;S1RX$mC-`X8OWEoWtclK zF`0QBO;Pp97lhZ^73g^+iSp_hAe~Z!T6OrsFDbHXqv&84rV2$kRv{N+pQoiYUfxn! zwZy(sU{BkzaRxmA>(>Tj>SW=ri`3bDHS(vJkN}xqNbXt9cn4is)dxPY8Rx@;M*&wcy$S0K1NIz46E5QNjld?tNAe1 z%p4JBNb+top-+xU5M~g(@Fh}Q$`A0%vAl?E;(GXlhXShJ@?tD!a5A>K&nc~ILgP8l zFqCZGjQbx(-F`ax!+rj6jV@$d|0Rz>xgELJgI`T3kb#qD8}XzRJq`fQq&7aw)yaF- zcZ>IhXkM_WR@UmnnJdcl_jJHk3@fC>zQ0?10^0cqM3YjPeNc-8;>yqz>sM0=&?ddk^XjXY}*p$6QZ z2^*zklFF|5<;rE;9ufw;mbdoEPIUx3WAJUg+%ouv{(6w&6%lKiap+m>q|(`5iw4Q%;FAc##-36UIP-K z_a4`onV~aTKqJ>nh-S^HsiXj=nSA{MZ*k@EOXu7_S4=3Y9Cbi1jBE1F4&7`y$yNo; zOum*OA$!4wJcrvb(-T4nCdKABU~e|Y%FwwhBc&Fgl2kgE%SG(U4nG?485L?726p-> z{e$olRIC!wXAWADa#HJr$~IJkC3fj5?xUC4W}}fAa4Qqz80)%KcepjU{VcjsWW{3d zWWAFDowg#n_L?LF0*IO%@kEwhi}~n&N-@2y^)_Wl%n-)G=cBIQ%y**E4j2c?gwQoc z8acNkr;T&mu|#aHA4FYSA1ht6(C*q(r@fKusFS(l%8%=PoFf-bS1p!H|CJxuQtRQD zL(7~Qu6-#t3K|Y!zSFUiTtUhrH_9Whjz~2r*Cd+D%pHjIiH}vvXZ+1AGoQEkR+_Pf zo{co*iqJL0+cd6LZM5jHP{HkbAH^z|KL4^f7h-U=<4O*{t(e*+kqn5GaJlC)Fv}LI z11Vf2vqqZgQyEV=>cau1so(*3xA?%AZ{A1u0l%G%Ehv>u;GkH>jw3^Z=FUsxR;>UOI+`oG}(TIgy zt%B~XvhIsGr5}ZAQ=wB}(V9{Rd!deuOB3!2Cy-*YF^ov$--9j%U!xGa!1;5`NC3e~ z%gkaMK!~|dRscM1_l$}O5;z+_uSJC(VSr{=Hf$1q9k81mrg6Ep_Ei6wd@aCYMlN#wp!2mW9RP6pS3B*Mv$T-gk1xtN$6Mv zMQg8F9LRZ=-JK1k8zqLRP-=Ouyaj)C5b_8{_u|V{FSl4ihY_>7D3&40BYnqKaJie- zAE@4Wh({ZAKH0me76ykoPfbk2xW(8%LCS}1xen@SVb_=36y;R$7JD9YK`C_l_MUD| zf=OrSmo{<6r`p9yRbr;HG5qcc!X}|aGvIaDb}A|J(MT8RPfGHqw}W&?3d2^Cr(bn_ z$A6xMlI`x{$(UA(rwMUAw3qP)-sdAfUwYb-tMU-gY)+7?zrz6i88vGx5z`6XT`hh` z*`SzCU zfBtRz1;a@N{QW~(l=7th%l~Ktgd2PbEPyMlXVPNgOBdxB_q1MFPqvMc+TW^FntZPfA2k6DU&Yk8WCB7B^DK%{$ML~AO z-~w&Ml`Be7?22r?H__^4rf&P?Ha7$PRG{O{nc1lbj8$%$vp)#!DeLv+TZFwB<($i~ zJbQMG3AYIF)4&Xmhv!*#iC;2p5H=_}_aL3cr27G=>bPRo!=4s_dz0m+tNK$g1(VTe zg*O`qDk9+7C28*Vq?4et`pa*}9;thY>5MTT9Pi~-3s)tKghX0Y4wF0f22RqxSD&oN z8vJ9ih$7t@saRnJWulJf><-*nJ zii{#Rjq%R`yx{$E!9JABiR5A!W6T3ZQbX{`m$qu6H5Fmr8**h5q)s%a@RR};I^o2g zTrF?KZHZW!1#6GGo*~q{=a~z&_5p1vQ3+z?)MxsI6rWl}r#S_p&8cDN0=U)R*K4a` zs>DN53E}b8vFE}or=^?I;iP1VT?_buTK9@*tWIGgZ$qOJ-SRHA82okR_=HEQn5C39 zXAn;P)9+PD+f6UB_|qS;!_jJ22)KZa{n$_-JL`Mg6HvH{s(|TP7^|Q~9(t4x5mhRf zJulf!Xc&PlpP_5G5?q6R0b^NWBFp}$9x#?{AQ+aQvDWl)B14KuXuk^SQb|*BT`{`3 zdf~|@Hs*`fLXi&I4BFz+vKo-rsCOyK#T#?NG($-& zCzz`HZK5STG1M}8>*tiK$(TwI7IdxsS#RPc3Hc3o^#Yf2W~$EP`e~`ua_eqcYQcbM z6gKD&O3RN;-6i9I0mdvRT;2LNv>|Ev1lQB^6XT9yWzx%Ck<+|n8S=-3iqI<`|h3DvFP;e|-TzhCf zy$s8br{Yb87y*+xkjb6QMa3pM+H36I@-$GtrXfq4dI!&!7g{DYfh4HGtauh>QSbqi zoG7V9B=jNdl|u+9owU}HxMir)Xu1(WB7qSJ(t9Eaue^WW+uYe8xEcPl$0Hg7W#E%a zSzAvy9_>JPBo`&TI5I-z`GdYRy&7=~zblr?ZpUhu#R+C~N6o_0DmDA|NF99DY$N7K z$<3g##rM~DC8#?V*(;dbkwa(Z?eD(*-CX7YN`0fJ9DXT`sHRaz&oXbW_5pA8ZP#F~ zqCOgPjZS2CdH1^wMRRqP>F%D4-l)-NcZ-bHA_y7G80PM!z1x}{NCZSioK-mNiG zC;S542xwo(oj_$R<7ckt@~2v&DKT$qcl=tQ6+=0U!;5+*hu1wk-E`z4z5)s;acdXg zDzv&61SU2oryf@Psu{=qd+Hw`VpNWo5-`?XPg}4PX@p!x(mmy&ZGKeQ1I4%A%5{^P zi58+!#kuAfdCjEaH|+u61L=0)Wn>-Ux~;ji3?{kW#5qxIXqQs$rr*WF4cV5Ke?r%A zt`-KguxnWe60MX@Sh*~KT87H5@#o5HAiu3K5nd85oMuAqpr!B={O2t&a zzUI09bJkoIm{|*Il^@kQ5>!`&6IBRB$wDGkMDl2YeQVJoi$UNNf2d5U3StuGM!?av zD43FMP9txr##?4#trn;(X#jOrU%P)$wIlOYsLRh}@_{H?$cIFCs_Gt!n|9 zIA4|hx*KU7tUiQ%w?Z~Tmabm$VsfHtpiHjFC#C^B0ZhyRq;1awq9LtSzLd;U$DS>k zgPL)U*ywBL)l#RtIMO#$p%E*~ENOLEMZ-&0)g1S6jA2X22nBME^@~4Im1`92)tVpA-@)Y zCZR7Hw6hqzxlV^!-p%D*Ov7mTb)my;jG*$|YT^*wxbxDX&H$9~+O}ZE@XApD!H&*` zP?_|v4U~Z{Bm_23D2)#wGhVt~Ju4g4dmq<}N7;KtgkFH}QFzF*-ZW=_Si4jsn|5&B zMs||OduqhOJh|fLvj}4HLV?%VXv>~{jf6q;ocL{HTaN!fdvCKN$91KPzDmF&5(v_g z+LkQ}Er6tCi$2uPkz~7jWJE^p$_gqnA{{^3EDa9aXL8V!JLwlNdeY)G?r9vLae)ip zk;>;muAk)Y?^|o_y(2TLNKsW$Rdfw(u`;u=G9&h0d;NSrRzJz`@B)&zD?d>V?}Oh| zlIZqhHC%lhAY`<^9IA63;vMk>z9>b06H%IA_Ml%T(Q&Nw1Dv5Ss0xU9i*g47A$TVW z!9+}V9$z*=H$Wy$Yv%w8jW13(9tk7MGH=U}`UASe(KG&~(9Gb;CD%nnEr()7h*tnb zijsq*X-CWwBxJs^J3|@Fh_q)QoEt(8Q531Y4)Ku><}SCb`>TT1{@z_iEih&#zDtH0 zmn_>Z4Hn}(lF#SGjtFfI^}r=uhRLjvv`-P7qVZtlPv#SP#|tBClQ0AlEzD7b=s&`} zbiKhpFwIk9NrNU6rh{_)Bx+I1stm{16j8+)lFz=2I&xHZOmzgI-uD`sbS_ZC=D``* zg~nz6ommn%sxk!%-y6HvKVqYT1wK&7o74Yf6y8-iPn40tvp0gyRWADkHJGF;$-#5+ z#ZUGaUt7I_l}fzQ7lC&uD%Ee^R?Y^J{08v7`oOr2DV^4Z50Ny zZ2R82N0;74NLaX6e4?c*JmBRn;Y?HPy7dZmwW!Z|Np zmq+huMy<6Ei95QD>=p;}F$PYbu&_rN^ne{loNc!%8rq`Q5~o#KXqTt^1_Zzl9y@@1 zG~%Cg=e7HkN}(h?+_gHUn*hKvC_hNHX@w#=8YDhhj^MnL`%pdW$WuJ~4*d;Z?Tq z`}N@0>O778B)uPvW15MZD2jv+F;q)Lb0(5~!I5KEh37*M4j7^z9~a%GVmP8S&!d*A zcWu7c29)?iOgEK-ghp-iYk~Up=2e~V&bKWo?(L*xDP$0viH#Zq2IqKI_gm$P=65B@ z&J*Bd(5_mBlt|ltQI2N{ZGi?7(>ogjzwUJ5^$yL`f2lEWZZ6)k>nt>?zpfvRWgV2Q zG9OwKqBFe^)dOCt(l5~Ht+P+v@C~1Bbk)#y1h2!JBX2lHd1 zTbOfL*O&~vORv9XjTNMnvkAa@-YsMyv8IIUa3Q2lmXCi2}8|LQp^lJN8 z!^|oe6cA`ki?tcop|fu?Mi_hGl~lDLUgbY)7i18F8s3EQKZ%@7ic^0gq&ZQ!)wXw% zf7hw@T#&~D&hcb3$howuNSA2K2AsFs^W{NDrKlzQ60NCaRjis;)Cam4Xw1S43)p(i zHLzNmq~6ayYnbslQfcQs3K9ife|Y&K94+lR!2*W_c!S_zsk4CWAECL>>Ouvb;kw%Nv)N$y)pcdxw?Apxjcz^Cw$`WLE@%7Z))bldt3Q_X^|;zVtLKsk z6R4y6P!vmtN%7%P^i5G|Ls6&wy9btB)b#zZB9Olu%R7p$_*AO!cZ@1*sZfdf#;2NX zswC1B+iImpuWFEJU5frdjov|{hM3209T0_pq~DNJ`ScGgAnnq#4ek%5!D;z^)qQE} z^~6rlT)Qnc8%1%{=>Z)&X%SP}NA5ZRk@x%q)tcHgxSW)pEzAkJSQOIB7VY_>7v)s( zM;GRmDWtc_^pxPbK^i62_0pah+c!#^Pa7I)HosSE`j1$P4!B6SJc4Ctw?s1WF?GEC z&Uxg|8h>~f7Ie_SF;`#0R*HbO_M2)k(OtO$1(<0;>GW>BxcKy5zy+!rMq&42HaTDQJBQ4QnwZhO|qXT-NK>(78mT zuaxkIr-L`5y&$EVxF&S|Sl5-K){*{>Ckss*ZwbNpaEJLprdGnTA{X@;>E6wVl251e zdB1D>Yc!e{Y5p>{aJ74$_HQp^JpbW-V@GXM(L}(Q;2wiR2tZDaBC^jN_~swo&pyYw z(=>C3j8B}eZT$1ulfEw2Rhi*|(x2b+94>kG&RcK&Of;iHom7UdNO1S@yQp2@cQl8o zmZIli%{Oz}AQiXYfT2ah#|W@PSnP_8LJ|}JEQlYr%w_MV!%yMUg@y!kv0xc7cW>^$ z{^g&W|NW=g1gRkOx2;OTq4iXr_xnEFAj$17fsuC3SN_;idlwpd7#(gTu@Qp|m+I`L z!@VFFz1Pjt_2o1X5$XRpTv9NAbkHX-F@I`~R$aD>S`%WT0S&KrQS6Kow}z)DfD+MG`Q#CQQt2T!eH{)lgyl46lTX3jf{0e4qF)K#B{!=F{9x)nM^$6< z8flUyamcyG-xXh7gnZjqKa%DTu6kAFrE_> zTYV07UEb3AFfs3)F`9qiYhKLfgQNNKaC>H^DkSVD&RHNkq*KBnY^G!?F5(4Y+cA#KEGR&Xp7HufunMPSQd0_5%`5~k~;p8 zsR_E@>J$0Yh;-!APLP}084zP)s0f^F+^%v$RA|u1DrsY9>A3KnQiroXKqdFBEjuCV&ywoTG?f2L-pQE5I z$>0>wsxoA}%5%phzbt!-Gg_my8yHPGE+c1)Yt>@v=w2lqtYIkh(3hi~ zSob><`^Y>>y#jM{BA}Q4uAyE=x%XGFm7+pg)ELi&{$P>5kB5Uo`m=7_h$l(#7^SL? ziY!S!3GpN|!npX+!p%q~pQ=uTpyq=zRg9e5v2Hm1QULx?DYfDZhI6smxZ2I-N_!61 zbM)s;(X9;jc~AuD5(Y|7-z@o_GvbcHbfv2~&ATKKnkKIDSi-*zhG+iF7Z#do%_VU2 zL>t1dk4?5MdO8y%1L~z9Ns%u!dZ_ZHO}q911FpGFvOSZKK4>~Dzq7<4v{EVl5F|hi zamkQeD=+DTe$-e+S}*XiJV5QkZ6m;CTlQ^F3WLk>wD=Yx*55e67rN1YEs?y&Kye6F5et?1s(w|B66j~ zj8m%2J0IiY0(KN4{N$7sK6~k#9YY&4m)vTkJN7oZ!3UHgppiW2_3T8)tGePVe&I~6vmX@8u5HXhnp{})fpGnB0I!jC2w`5SWe}TS^>c@`0E~=> z3Y-Aqdi;O=QOsQ7E?r1APDW=8O10D+K9qOKyfD~NNW~R3o@L@pD>t!l%mep9D&XEc z=+~P{bs{zJ^)~&XWA>giVt!~cq?~elwm)e^8Gc8hS3cE1V{Wr3o+81zsT0VqEP=vE z3iFSgs&+AE&ABqQMZ$TOBG**MTNy?+jqmLc?yo{`S}iI+sj!Q)U$kRc_#-t-AO=xb z^t(S%B%w98S&X%5u=U-a&ro#$#45=lm!`|DY-BqZWKu($%v#cqV3#*{Auk{XnHQw3 zz?sev&9jQLz@GJ3-BX=9i#^bdFE+|uU;cH+Zr(C`5C;pNMqwx3kV9zC_*)MnVFIjM z&dmgWhf~QH1uN+FSV+EF6v3`+5%HQ5OJ{7lt&7wDIfwuOJd;^inVyu%nn;3j=^5FQ zlHe4Dna!h&;Vnca9+gFk=?>HuCTxD4Nt?7c?)IFq2Z}mWWk@H4sQ$klTvSY$>$-hL z)eBllgmj-C5=?413E7O1!xIEM&~~U0@{RU9u@3a72cA)sqR145BYMt@-4`3xHynZT zQeiJ`C#d%CT$lPo1NMA`{B_FjpuWClxM*aE;X7yI%5kZEgjrXn*aV0}gNCzY{42PJmb%gNW%c>Nfn#^w^#(6>Uv zL4eSy&6Md-FRNwoyt*j|{o_ROhl6kZ8if@&zIbX!BSyEPbbdHL(g`1-C*O8+hZSlX znufzQvXz)A;}9N|8XGP-76+I>ho3$hMe#LA_Vqe0kdsY- z!;}8I9F?&P@5`5?LWjyTq*zzb^vY#F`YOYTsL8x%fyzsTeoN9&w-e$rhGzv2X$Kn9 zl&+0K)USsjF-0-}B%}Lr(XES;T`F)03l(?6!OdRD`yw$GT);L0iY-q6L)F$q2`rr7 zpjY@m4jn=L)8OsF@#h=?Byy{@wnnsc>Piq4XXPKxowk}Q$hr*HRe znjLz)0g=(qT&;`?nH~#hn7lhcL4{VIFwRxJ2%8ir$ zLp1BWIp=Dv)?!_+9z+^3CuXH0?kny6Id3}#KgvL&Ty7oRNN1~X#7nX~DQjeL%W5+C z%kDhst7R)ayf5Jp%{I($e6UvOu1BsIw*?HRxQYOf$v&)>u4@P5d_1h(df~d^t~8>e zRBKWtO9-C#4624Olq)NukK{WSwNGmoXfZK`g{(FUvnjh{uEPnQ0G;WyIKwpy2>Yn* z%D{h};_cHZRXWOIMbE*iku`nPrX&ry(dJ*Z9qUz8FrGC9J6Cu-+l=Q?7k>ycrfZL? zAzXlErmT9H8&gkFTh;DqbdI7*MNGPYT^!6}aFu1XlfMvXVhn zc779CZ;l!b$An>*yKJDF5rx%8VeS$}YALx*g-DCc6jUer=poz2K?Ezj$XaJ6mDsiz zNG;BhUkdiUdfDb^(0G;2L6SeFzO$EvH9luBrohIzjCw5mP{3-+j1Bb!i?mFL(KX9O);2QLhf7!p}l_>j{_aX)i?5I83gRH`BB z`lLh;&)CpWo8vNWv<@?JQpigP4ucR&`8u(Ut4%=x->4H*N$}L7Q_#xkzpYegs|ytv z0SVC->dF&cn3npqt=Jq_>JyW~T(2_uebq7POu{~i|C6Y{5~nGcJtD7l>#;L;RQr`q zHxNFT(99#ibGA4{@%^L9oJ$E9S1nT9Z<{L0)9a03H-+RS>Zp?oaj+;P@*i|b^$p4dw)=RMvRH%F&xzYsfe)eg_%**Eu8w?$SV7?QHCa$_Eq z&R@Wi2)DI7cHdW^21&Ua!qL{M+CsE48 z`9d~H>8AXS)DU$-tqLNhQ|ToCFR)NtYMQE}SCe$-W?Kt{MCnxg{RKucmTrXMuVz#8 z76a2|%P{DZJxyvjhn5>Zio)^$1h7Yq=FAPlf`)p16e2 z?saZ(>3y`Af6cZFpTy%FEO`!0mz2tcTG-`tBa3e*H9?jC?!$*Zn%Hnc0t z9fiFvr+u)4!hu~03S3$9iI+}L)A9%1I_(f!GNXEhElYdR!zgLgN6Q8Cc!6&o+Fq6k zlx?)?iN=q_@SdyzMxcng+5rj8j#ageB~=B=&ZDT?8t0HnB`&)hOVEVFGa0HlrC zRi%*KOJ($OdGwL>xu$Y2m9s;$13iY_UlA8&sexBCm{hMm#GI(Hk27BAagdJ{25Q@} zNBAkzES?({noTp}6Y5WfG!@`q2CH8Hd{d-f~5Q3$u34e|gOinGi8sU~n5gox^% z?Fje?OJ|A#2Z~_g7oUvpQ4`40Gz)8e3!Nd%dF>K95`j45OU!Ft7e5z)jV$gbg7)UM zNyY$QDk&Ea0CK>C{wInNjS0RQ$SJVy*abuvYBGunKt*~%+WhgQa^Px%s1=!fLaS@h zEiLX=DLI>EMIxzolw=j()0&dA7}H0 zpeuBh2J)jCTEvK+_xLZ5|foU8{KH`Z;TeOKf4QQgZs;WvKij&Z*0zd9OfqV znyWsn2GN2`8ls6@*FM|%x!t*+;fy$TMyPrCYCb%6Wrszr|IxQy)W7wgp&u^j7@4=e=Oj4nw;>?-kBI>!GKAJpDXBo?f0`cGVL9T>1Y# zZfkj)09rt$zqfz-*4z5lJCDEf?!m`@^7Fqt`1sG?`su;P-~GwY&UpMM$!E6DHpqwV z!iWCY6+VF3jT^c#EZgv+QvTn5`fd8f4&2W2QQIxSW8sh6hd@c#`$GW5b>T1Qd!D_C zzXH^4>C~ol?DcokwU)f)4>>8q*&qw)8++M1Z`s=VCT?$iFx}gaTi9&^UU6VI{WxC5 zGp^-32Y1xp=(YTXj&pVxekymin>xSZCFZ`my~K7D(bwe%j9I52V0sq4&IfwM-1{;w z%2_nu73?b}7C_xKalcZq|a>$L!jeI&*!-e(@dxA*zHeYAh`Uw@u_(f6Kl z=ZD<=pWNR47*SetJ|N0!h{NMi?e;LgU>nU9+ad8$|V^?3-wDd}^`45iHhmVsSb*v|fJ>cng!y@63al8QK)wC6iU(eR}= z>_I?UVx|=axOcB>GI_&p)+cS#Zd#oM?XWuX9jlH~zFIGhb@y5);T##=4Z8(T&csCL zsn%+O);oyVzfJjmNXqvl9kDNW8PT^n--WF7Pc@6yoDUPe-lk=z-_p!L67Ji4?_j=n znF-eGIEBu)&Jy(*gFHnqEuyYV6QwBWYG4$n}zTG6RwUw3)785ebhe~4U@ z&&s>oJno{VPZLJ%7*xtr*9pG?+_pIX%)3qCzHb7jq|d{?^0#^0>#pdJ8tU(bylqPK zH5RxjMO|B<-)$CmnOWTOLbJHj7e`f7h2}(1K~5$Wz3P{|E^y*Di`%>EzotZM*vLVl zrd~lO<`^aw$k|S6h<5e*W0YeHqOrGW+{JW+628s>%H>qRx1?xV8DEVY99=w;Jkx&N z?Qr!%Z%-FQClmRIAd4mvK5TO90opE}xgkM--6nt+mH;(~xzje3q_=6{g{=2q z&?K)D?XEa&-O&h5CFV^F_%vsK+Z_Vl5~N$61;XlUP3msb zvc3EKxQz%B!DtghT-Ggh_b2xw^{o_T#xdLa(~(L;=gGJZ8jExl z484c!j(cACU4Ut})F}c#%(G*G*UOKuInBOJ#&&MThe^eFXb&u_lDZUje{Qp`3(LAb ziy{<i6UwFD!fwsM>4dd28vP(1O8nJo3{Ad6;d z;s&aq$Y_LVrLx9qe?+=rYK;mbL_mZhn_Ml^C?VlY`%2)ku(gU>`zXcH?K<(dh0`g{ z!4e;Fpq)E08}e)3bpsh^U9}K9B7@xG6YSh==xO_UCfCohRvx~aT2Aj8w#i*M>gAIq z7<;PcPpOG0S*Hl#1n`*7*0hCvgzg{4L&;^`3R&xZ_Bbl7iF1-j)u&YQ=zAbBp%;4> z%2{tkuZ&vOQ12Jyw=Ne5iz}hmUKX7Xq61;1HubV<#IfQesE_w2{tut5BONUzM%~Xo z@(b39q+v;8nzKHB7=Sm5ElXe4x20c2e$|XsufpYc==24jbofSq;{=U4zpz}7bi$15 z;Z;TJaIp`jA>tkk*ye1YEpp+k#3xg4l?;ZipRwx)PijGWFnM}8c0Oo>3_cx-F=r6wr ze-0Y{b#c6G^=xjBoW9sXaJ6)5Fwa*#8+!>12siau-7Bl~G(g1h2abC2CI0L^1X36L zGzWAL6HDs82***pkLp5QW5(gwVNJeLzMK3MM@Njn*ob7UNDC@>I5~wq2MgR3e@B&9 z$pXd1@u)cccZM07wG8XF-yHMPs)fS#`q`SOsh54gscW2=o2eb88*#kTY@>7PC%05b z(W;Ojhy`;VuH?eiRsG-RZpIP#-5)P{4OfQcZFS=31yVobF8y~!AHiFln3BW%_u({X(Y9Z&i|*?$Rhqb3 z`gi7#uPN4kLI3V|U$`UvjKBNc@4jlww}0}^&wl!|-@X0TPk-|6+dqHrJ(KsfclwB* z!rte{mz~HQ-hJ=ff9L*tOscN3c1lMk{o&&25Mbz{(%K9Aey=)KI$QuF)zygKoAtGB zOG&H-pNu)wYaz)=9x)4b$A@@JnRi(=<1;?ffR`eI4GAh8ABa6B1@EJbI*e-T&K@W< zKa!|KlMH>_rcG0!culN6ZJU_+L4d=l07~0wy`+lv7HUITsc#p4Stt4ksras?PdjTB zu>tDU3=KByv&d_ZYH5R1a%-L{Ew0z#Y;r1-ge9Ha^lR3(=}L}VGZ!~ZHms?kG%eCU#KHNb;@Ddpd-3LeVeo)Y59AobWX0zp|eR> zWO=~R86{v}`h=Su<+vyYc%|YWKD41*>;HvPK%Zq!f%FO*VTdjMyu)X2+Vu}oO}?Op zkv5mVZ}xSi@#@<37tXRx#e%x@#QCt=@Z}}T)2_)9vJdp)@iiyVeCtK6u#kFx9Mp)} zuWnct)z#X1D~wvG&izh1)_8&dh?uF3XRUje(rW05s@iLr)7qD((Z<*Q;ZT^dV{`b* z9aYbRV)0e(dNcr!&Xby)=W^s%eH~ab%y}L7m9Ov{pRu9YDxdvAT=mhHXgQU~UAq=% zh^yZg$Ud*~!fe}mMC+$}+2y#%?~D+Cr0Jn~wIN+j1})=K&I>#=TFxcC_??OKG;s@4 z4zX;PhOA|^X@VDf5mprV%zF{C{s1q)splHYdo_1uu0OGto{aPF&+5kZ)Uxt8X6C_r zf2O;6#-EY*96sOyy{t;~lUVVXrEzZNz)J{4h>^C>6;A(s)bt^8Kqn1&E1(MPluzdM z@+UZomx8sM?K<#_%3N{KYAIDQ(`qj^;PN00)A(vn#(H=SW{iK>P2elrG7$v!K{PUGYt%p@;N<#R(hfMRtb&3!OMtz-I!SYi5O*u*) z0VROXC80LK*%P;^J}Nk+eIRcTC)_@<9lI55Qn7N1)BljMHhyXB4g7*z*r*GtbuM~q zKd8Dq!znZkpNsH(&|(1=MAfh0LS8Ut_?j5@X-u9aahKItXj7#J(Jqctv}Q*{u46+W ztpWJ8fTZAB!=DEeg$*~^-<*)K_6~OF+jxDjjBiZo7n&eR5503JRNVMnTj%|{RTM5C z=z~h-na71~@<-^enFA_Y7M$U4TmN2Ypf_3B@$aO#uVuBxa>}zX9mGdqPsA^b33Lu{ zsd+7e<&X|DcYissN_FCb39kRIUmAKSv?CjW8W^37V*2sus2V~sI_HTigJ=VU=`K(N zupTHj7(UCjX z7x@hs2eR|&V{ac(rERw=45pa&Q+Il>f-nRgt{B;XMiV_o@??^yI1(M!gMFVzoNKq~ z!%vPMP+oodqOAS$ITj3o+of6hAD*?upuZ%35J1IL3!zE#4FxvzCAcEBgb!edG}+qJ zMS1Z}rb}(+&1LAz+;Xid3+vRKN{;N)7Z&IRj|H{ifhR6+#7o+Q^R{c}gzBhIYZ1A}PYts(JT5djK zM`gBU#u+K*LQyQ)>~Pzy`TN+{=LWd zp(d^q_g{Za^XGe?wDq#^C&#@n+7au|-F;~a5yn7U|F`_1w5U(&5kM6+>QA7P4RPFIqv{>wz;j#hOL4~2yIK+JM6~x> zDFCXD(A{q;1)tXNc3p9Sp1vqB<^v-2M0zfYM_smByT$0?|HOymy7C(@`^wd>SQQyi z+#_I~pmP<#y#uT?XWj!CiDk9DbxK;X!Gut+eH}H1ulzrc1vvjXTS(+ zYQ?KH=k1btIrp~TcK!;Tt#f>N*_FY$kIdZ9$E}w}tEcIF-kMstHR|N+bb_BGX%7OW zqh}U_%kRJSv9EbM6iG5mR*bq$bN80W4JkN(?Z4?UYVb9}s{h98ijmw95cP;#UKfj& zur{8nem#v_7XkUPmoVp=9IExA)7FN8^vCD3u0@`GbbF9Pc}rk@XgoY=mj3G9`K0w} z_p|oiheg-s*~k7|^Fb!h{)-O+3m_VNefQ40Jg(no5~JkfyiZTKk(E>S3u6nqjs!_qxQeXPmi+amz`U+ z-AVSjFBRQ!jZgT6&$hDPcGc>55Zv*%wH=k`@MJ<4GeH8)f1VhJZY$qZp-6=e53J4` zEU%xU7X#!-YQYqODM@G0|E{)*H-2#S!|6IwQzB$Zn~ajKz3{g?YH3kdM*2&eu^RNB zozZWk>)lHu5f|br>zh}Fna@}cKQGlfX)GxCR8If{z`3}zJyhG z@zlBbVobf8v%Jx5HHmtL;kKEt>bIp!KG0PGm_I)qx!?xKTsg2%1NxVyy+W?E@k_%w zi?8opGQ`fHzR(fqzIEsZSmR?vTCnV-u!&^{c&d)ML&&4U(Iqz`G_1o5>bANedGH&G zxl0kuJEOJ6*Ks77uKbo+M-KPgX}rJJ6${HhW&$wdqMdC^8C|s7TKNmqysm}=%uX>PG5&6B--yG(eWWIs_#MCFpzn~ z;tzTKe7&t~d-{JWvND1}*d_@Li}D!6N1YO~`}9q<`leV-T2+u2XuDo%#@5ub*(Rcq zk3>BnG#Hhb`ZEI&F3Li|qE65~Q&|G*-mu>lNCf`*hZux?UW}@ofujKMZeP8K(uR(* zx$N}D%?`BLnZN|rf)xtl*@e;Ta!lz6Q>?!BP?y?{x+XxKrxRH>D1&JXoZN$ z0S|YwBoqdak{%+R%cvB}cr{*sh;kfG`Nf9@>Au42%@{+Sdr0X-=rHvDrLkSf#$i87 zf5Bg4iEV*_V(j2!G=9j$CM={9{I=+ld?M0iBa|p4HW&o8mVE`A8W$IQ_bngr37U z_kQ+~KQUchfJP1%m+X>#Rl@RQT@hn_a02QYajf# z8(EnhcoD7>{Sn?90cl%YkX@uNT~`<$iS>nCbgn}jLw*;@t%AyrX!@+%s$rUDc9IRh zF<~?MXi>>&=6@8WCzB=U{LSAL7gDrD-FE4eENHdFK!LYY;XBb;nP?g$FI=lI5^&j# z1gTs>je|xYUfReb#xa8dBRcqYbuNUjf5AlykJS09lX*md&PXn}Hw6%hMLK6*c8DQ4 zVJilp)^))|Kjq0(igc3B(evFbanW|7cDGxnr%{jXIR66wlUg4}dc!>5Rf>oKoJR|b zJdz~q?oqx{0g9{p_)&3_1wcBBB|Ni2~u&eBq-;(TFzQ zSJgUu(yZEgsYm83uS$Pl9v6Mp|FC)i=jVg$VfM(!s-x`Vsvp|!WTq8($JekwyL)Dx zd?_2TCVF|*xOh?~2?bWXz}|x<7(aF%$~$$X0V-`Yqc>vXgl%499at(y?WU0YebeHP zK2XgcZL*q_&V(Q^CmW!jNCWMVA2iEj!Wo`U*x)bi7Cw$wyHR-`$#Dbnj58Xy5uln~ zoPvk0rYjSTEF)@er5xMQ7(5ev2zSW))xDA>% z8)TXf68ecukmig%`l&bww-aW@#+!6Uh|z7fLPOTInyq~k9e-JXmp zLhYK4j4wPC=R3N6+Q_D`o4OCmBYWkqQq) z9HH!MlUz;|Nmg~cDC%o>XngQc$PHpot?AM?!Me5jU+eqj{9b|h})bT0CtSg$8 z9ftk5+30GLe%(kmpGhRC*hCtnOwf`VFc0y$1%)lNE8b0x%9mzVT87WzIqI8sqF1tz1IO!`g zV@`>QF7*4NXw(5S*b7Mv(U#Qqr%LeROKN*7CAPak80^hT=;c!%9Z8q4J(r*g;?>m} zuw(pm?a4B)Dd}@~tA41I#vM|(Rie74+3KE>+N6t? zeMa_vzz{Z+zg~fu+Qbe$>rL6L8aovVt8VQ<;#dA{&0?Wrp!5rXQ;sG^HV5z<{+5CAj_aURN7njQQZ{nHvaw%#(y0WmR9_>>ARTJrzi)D;X=?Ox3)Gp{M6H@ zUYpD>nAFOEy-VP6Ax%hK5~3!VvcS^QW$9i@P!P6KhR@T#`gzm@jb z6M=N#G>WF$_>!ViMu47ldK3LO4zt~4z!J%gZ0VS?`wRk0=O)3?DC0(LM@52({@gUs z1sU>aEs`33(DGdK&14iArymOR(zP!2cL|AlS&^Kp+mWPXQ0k*f1!hf}sDI7P<)r3u zp#4DEppx-?s5h@&rhD$ml7N94?EY#v7JRx%ug})x zD`dXtZKG_Cu`96W{H;CxAH`7A*~h2<_sQx1`*n8bH&32GNCt!4hV!ckEs{z2vD=Cc z^Rie2*H0bE-r)}+)}YO1wi*klhx9hy)^yBbt}~~FPDb*mSeTxn1ZzB%+M- zlmQcE&KpCF#Olf30~lJy!kJG#+2D4@zvu+0aXjKsU@O~4 z-L=1y>LN6mRXi!0?BjO1gp^1^?!(63SM22ZNL9{3#?5n6cZ^pj7Xz94AQ!H8E0Rh; zCB1~QU$cTF6Ci6CfR-WPBtjwPSN)pCA1c7Auxl}yf`SVO#@K_Kjl)^^-Jitz0B`l( zpLLs1l_<#~=m&$7o{-ug34ZU0%bNNW!kEB`Pk9zJ7$%A zO~1?rL8S;Zh~JdZ>r7c9;7*c}kQILaeZ>=Q;n(Ol1VH&6rAUYr;qny>vP`H zbR?&00=@BX_3-Pi9jdPKcmH3r)BgkS@TK2${uRw#@D>IstvVMl5#W$l#HZm-(`VzFmUK3%(f#qp{Qiu~H9>ZS> zU3=!_VAJ819Be*2?l%fCOER2ZXlOo5Id;H;DSo%ZUGK9G!GA|jP%94@`#_bn3o+D| z574ck;p2vjsLW{CvDm`t^T`NXCJB@7xuo3y_DW8@N9o|^=QW!my7)Ea4K2+M>Y(u` ziU=XW%Idc#N!<)rCSR%$J24^eTP}x>_CgN{Quh)!o5@&SfqPc^2@P8FKI7v^s_G+s zm)1sxf6{}E6~vZJBqkMpie-sTAH^5KG4OA43>-l&tt^>g_&oYfl8nm%BDgUB z8y`EL%r3@mrIq(@s^@oe+fN}e(LfX#$7l)rO%s{{Q|P6MpAT1&WKH?If~-gQJcd(} z#H;kC&&6Q61NQRB?3claLCW739OR;NQ6cPxh?Xd9$emfVkct?$9p;7oU9E6BE18yx zWuP*Nzd2O{Xk~ETjG`Ei+%Whjvxi;N*2@S4vUm?Exk@M*r2F%@H(GBWHN=`Jxi^kp zqcLpK1e^DaM|4Jw5Y7}W+EPNMKb2-Ip3oLhqo@R4!lOaATCfju`nVcRZJZQJF8aB4 zQGP(tA}X2Bl-xA)FMT|fnyt>`o)}548^SJn9W|Bl$gGRAUO6n`pO^ z6VZU_-7}&!`_}Em?l9uQZ%T_uNE!*zAf|Jn<6H&?hI&b=WEC7Nb;1a_C#G)S{qcR7 z>h;1@aLrQFzhK>)9ECnPt10NfcF$n{OcbM@78@um-1!8u9u2y%K0f`ow|`2y+D~_? z6ky}}xHs2MG&g__@7i&ru#sa!5%lV$QEF>g34J>~E=Fnb)#lE|>0|)AB;4=N7_h_b z9aH9)C}Ifl>yu&_j@>_HUv9c;wPFbQqFp)aOsLmPK(|HMUlI-bD-hQqqAn5u34 zly(}Mt&epK2BDT;6sQ03^}SEO8J|_se2T8>p-bQcDY{1jo{0U(jpAk$xQO{@V|Cml)v+fvC(zdO zY1$z)+Gdeqc(tkTr3o=4Y=6aZ1))ID3PH%rAd7<_5lki4EiC4(mXu$Z^JD^AxTC+q zIRF4#nc}B0YIji3`}17sF#Q&ISp=txX>w4UuXaGpKK=ziHZ@jP?RuB&Hy!w;(;)xl z);isme(-jL_%-tMG2bOFB;*EDDVn$Mr)mw$bH&sy>@T0U2Th#~z;sh4nQ1ecBz9|( zoZ(Q-C3BU>1c`4J<~BKN^jRU1>`dXNr=uD-D!veVpL=HMreMdUPox-~!GIOiBV|@r z=o$*j+7O4pKhe`WkvT}Oa$q?1D?Omxz*qQ_rcyFEH9W;k0W|W4^NRb~mqp@XXy_cv z)|YM2c#OwzOy=4Cw-=ysCg-smk^~{r5qAl^i8ZkpP(mQ^(#m~#`s~*IIcxAGmSA)B z&@2dPP%~1SsFfN8gc33=_)SGbY$cm2Gh0s0l_u@L#1l335NnMH^I}|-_NqV8 z!$+7K79xi#kV(uuOSdf+rUEvBx|zJhTsLZ@^=p=IF9bCLndsy1X>x(x*clFP|&POCDcNO9GzC3pcKrRB@s5>U1+Qs8VmN7#QN9ZNVkf(m|$OMb_vvYy1#?1ocB^4+?0Kc6~##_SfmKUji9g z>aRH!7pHPn&eXhhMAa2X{>+{@KnKO?2cc0vbE@uBS#AO!vL||*Oly{=R-yqQ9>$l} zWjZTFO2G{x)`7ql1nZ2?A4SLW#KsL*{kZjeOfu^)xjyI$cLmp80kS51BD~0ieLT6` zxg?UBP{~h)5LaZ_sa=k_N+&yGBy^e~5=n1znrUA~tf0WL7Y8U4e-=f_kQJ(nS;}Dv z?O6)KTza8Df2<(2lq9+N+s3e<40^QG<^zRHWV!|MV>#nY7b8mPV-rVN`C3osdorpF zIC6o=gqp`PC4FsC`&ZwXvvSWA9<=Sa9CZi*r6l-CtQVF46WsaQ=i{~T(Zq+5G6i$$ zB@`f0?aW~b5=)PLtYPYwBs+$dn;c@WyKxYoROA}<-Iwii>3H(}ci(3^hDn^Cii{A< z@P}d)0h;yqV_WTh^Bwg^q0sht|0Uzjo+$b#(&s%p^Gj9SO6W*1cx1$JK2 zxVovxiW?GMPX9nfQ%v{w@%{Pt;y&Jdeeg)fpSSN2%|=PP=oMl%0t5?3Zo7 zgl6QZ@lKEGV`D39Ior!!z16)B;193sd?aB9sgzxDke7p3tol z#E-Pe{T+LM|2I`fE7cL3yi37xt8VQC!zj9(-EjC_6%<9F4%%mvx0FALw?fezSiI#1R(ulWJoN0?sh{`hnbuX<{z<7EI^G4-!|pcB3mXLI%Y58 z%mW(-^aF(42*UGG&A9zGSoYg=tcTe~sOdFTVAuraV%(yjo4X7mUxc#QaKHpa*#C1f zy1%r!>j#N1PqCEaDFxu!crp62TK__zLUouQgg$=S6?i|i6^P$k2Fg(SYf(9Y*zg^F z`L3-fhlEEuz^z;j&(>angrk@3wBEF$ieR4`lgir)j zMpRzCGk%Q_Tk~BV)Jqs)uqLR~C&xS!@NfFR;UA|jHYB>?-{g(skKL=8*-?B~zid90 zvIu!!CK}ID+`Axev}{$MGAJ%~lBewU8-(=Ai{#HPZJEj~5Z2xGLK9x4{6oqn6O_1! zmzpe~X+2H6L;SsXAF@a$UmChaeFSm}E*xM6;NS$HZ$R=ZhK8i3THm|wztWqPD}rsp zt&sj$_Kg6WmskBHqcqGv+Uun2cvig%?qMR1_kWkFxlt8`XUMHzqg zn4v|wt%_NQjIZ1d=o9qAbzOjGTw0`Ti(2`ozFHL(sEOa94BgJwOLjXQdO^MrD(wsM zLI=|R7x_a1I#hv@+NoOek*YT*dO_;8ryXAa8@8G_yQ$)$Vqr;n7AZL;)~nWl?BTFMh=~DlBe2rN(HZ_#p#Pz8-tz3G#@a60F(1%;rK#fVEVrL_>>}%{J)>bU zbtOIS#N(#y+7qORvvP#ayC_o=ynS$=T5ruZ({n~<#NE=PY_Bz_vh9IbebiR$O%;)V zt>E6%7h7M7q>FIQZm=peQkSGDO;RqMEYGwah4W7^0%__hEhO4rsX`;QN39?FKnMmt zA3yz{niG%@-nm*Gfb)PX95>V|+i;|im{3Z66w8s|UYQ4*3B|Scz=ukYaa{Wx1V_E4 z`{E4f-y{!2bQr`kt;9sO7>->BR_`PKNAkIcYlkm-INPo?<|Vmc;+{9pvJ;x#cYnJ4 zQ5IXQTA)yGg=RPgobK?@Fy~qM-Ji2NUvLj(Umd%)JIOQs@$(K8MjQZdzxUodcUi_V z)G@?0y$j5ZNmCz4zm9>;?++Qbu=t)cnsM*|Dtpzz*Jd=DvO4i8J9117PI(ys5l6&F zQ7(R*zAhTK#tfX;I!73q;Rbp9&xoh;|&2<3I5O8#N(|lI49m(w+!jstO9(-4Ohcx` zv!7tbUIR?n_clOW`tn!$R&z_YC1j;gqRn*Mcs@|iM&vUe>|xO{{dP?PL>I;pT6kz6 z3c?{(ed(qsPCrgJ&Zx=HL-k{$XqlgFh^HW znSQP-#6QaftV6@BoE6nVQ%<(7RoJ=kY2 zjMkTUVuiCq$llRlN=2PXT7t8Tffal*(DW;{ix9+BBDR-!@?v3%bCAKSbP3Ma$2+4% zwd01J42>>ff9mGbI(}4VLA&b4xLF=D%#B+(g{c<-r2gelG_^a)z5=VPIL_`|`WgRN zv?Z}2+HrL}Ku&y_eMx1w>|r@yZH&VA=RduhhaO)%JFvC3XqJg7&75m2`j$)-7eqPl zlGc_cH3U`e<}FcFFb+WSV0T+_04kF+LSo@0Cw2#Fjw~a+bvwL))6w)wevVdvv7ki( zLpCT;{JpvG3CUjNYmazDwzSID?BpzRs~ZmVAlgzKyA0}Y@2fqBLSU~(v`7>~v{%}> zph7UxY}9p7n|Kg4WK}OtPHzs>t%j)9L5K)gP%fi*JSy6&6%?3S;6R`dzs0UAt=FK! z0BE5om5<;E86XuX=I#@QM%EQjrcv)C|JhaYSb)@Qu@oYbIN#wN zQw7MYyzj5(W<1k<@13H&C&(MD1M3J^@yrBi3O4Sd8Fa<-h7{2g_=wk$1ALLE+C@@- zm@HDir&ib-ZvE#DK>bH!_qFbzSH8y=qUZC~G4yg5os~T8QTDVQ{o(KrPku8~6JYZ7jRDGoo#pr6bn80ECg@yQr8zj3vuHr1ObWX}~MsyF$h za5QvTxAED~uJE{^sRdx5mo6M{=#A9dsuo+IQa_MeKTsD-$slv|}p+dC^H z!!n2_5eiC0Gbo)F(h+~rk0C!6T(yF}A6ZWfY>NGj@+iOx)Re>8q9$b*gMafGA<)Oj zg3y{HIvC&1lAJg9Fpxg;Nh5v>*4g8|7rIbrXld$SgKEA~a|T0N^eP$CjNn)T!r2gE zfo%NFqmyqGkHkgd-@L7>X60|}UAEnUk?add9s3uru!o4~&gWK?E7rxFVdsJ0-wgJH!{?Vd~bZ^u4NVYCw+$(_#Irz4^Ep_5cK72xj`2im;m zGUpE;M|#rav?f}VBI=`x<)#f08yV>*(;lVv0N3Up!2Exwu-rxUo&+lBx&>X{q{9q@ zW#R4jroAj1K1_%)b>?y~c_K>ts_x~aXy{!KQV*DdaG} z;9E~mH(iWJNz=F|0x3!=8?+$R{WkGHEg%x`I%WQM2F{0eT2#Ht(<(S2@dk|HuZog! z@{0m2Z7PzQaO(GjWnM^xllkNXfHzla{mxr&y>*vUBoZ^w@s}%*>SmqA2O$jU0C8x? zhTLyC^_9ddTQOx7_28#K8#XB~x85{u!U?Wb4tz zPFv{PHI}=f?1lk{(O2GpVDrIKZ79>NG}whp+OYA#mF}p)m+{gE5kH8=aG?l<9Rc+a z3kljS;ebed2dBe+M@D0HJi;z9AP9RYI|pXF80EkhjH-Wy+Dn8T5t?iPCM+jlAVED4 zC>B!fXXA=zKLR&vB908ws$&us`;mUTstVc#Ft35>{82J?a`O9o(X?em;(7hBF8oU$IseU|L4Y0g%c@@ZVlDfySaldd zHipPFdF5E&_+pW*M#PjMQEzaKN%0SR?0DWOq)j5qh%OjJe3)4(HsFL622v+0Ey31EMXtqQ>b7&>7qEl;-gzDkxoBaU zqPrWTuf7Q(RSGj5TF|1we^UtyHg;4T<)$@XLgQ>&?h{BPRPj&hjQRj2^#ez&jOfbo^o+S3j+Wgx_3@ zTinJ~d-`X@D=1XNZWJ?Y?z5#eeHa7d zwdIKy!0I;jw=gNC^P+F-al(O2yK!6L*OX^<49_}IWkFJ>>OrReP(Cf2y8d^LyLQvA z+sI@yBvVEDlRGepb6x_RFqV z6g-dr5eh6__EoW16h%(eRLqajx!`dh14I+mF?|g15iTo$&Q?CKloxtIXU%74%3Qe~ zmga(m%f0BGNLVYHSo`Sy_=bAc+R$M!d_6Uph16$S($ZnQLfE`=swIdzOrS{)8; zEhiW7fyCIe&xFX+v_r9$xR~HHkyxrarr#NrIxI$URs3!LIabGQy=xNeGlX$1(-n%W z4i(_o-M9c_Va&cfc9mazkBeq;azFco1X@!O+-ZcrsU&Q=zB&l73=?En>UWBf&Ix3I zEs`3eRy%E$uWEIv4FTpoxZ(KObtGNh{Ec&_hnRplL$Nzdcaip1mpFb@w~eXQ6szd3 z(Y>^#8LOhbxR##Yg5Z#>BG>MjMDe!P=%uqocFouH4&a?<*H?%Swoi}3_$^Nr6_P^% zkujtwdo{F3dD!Poqvmd3L%(rRCeml3eMAon5vSYjAnXvWInpoZIv1BqGGHsw}GY3h9 zW+jRq(}B>czzHwn*1^$@?MOr!cP((7ujxv0{iJdx8n3$10}Zq0+A#K}vE0O7Pj+FP ziGf^#rUY<_0wXO6YSHVO?ybN8}qY-n??jj+JMFS zvD(k=Sl68XyLj?WUp?tC1*9(#az?WM^xeH#l znR;tVu#cy|t)I!-la5IqrhdSVIW)*tG{+*=eDaikmt{LHYN{rF8CP%Ls(&s1%yH4v z)?GaiZV2n`aX|E2oXrYdNVdr7AB8v_#>akJ=n8awoHopEEbKF+m9$7DiqCbC=Ki7)aR#2d zc6df=BxZAu&P{_H>%m7@>==LL*)k%sw%S%Uhwec$l#!Nuen0zd(NU@EtLmSMruf<) z`M;65@^q}cL$_V~jadP8r08>ZM6#=57t4 zc$DhT;CS>zXBH1ea+te<{0qm zHE(D`s375VR&gVvE-FC)PLh+P0-tjouE!yCZu=s_4QDEnA4LBhrxSt3*R-L!WC+Tn zdn`6tF*aeXJfnwG>drAW*%B;ll6D*tBrZm19E^4rkBtmiZ$@(QVdU~fEERL7WV&Lq z)z+FNN`y_v2Ftpem;Ws_%u$WO-PE1;3PK;+Rb7Yq9Y^3mr_!V&7F(siR8m{$plqp% zySso_Avx5<`ilCUO7Sw-6le%IY1VW~X@wUl=X>IRrQWO3@@v->hR-gE&QsIDZ0r`2 zR{B`-dDoW5?%rpe?47P1S^&*;vVVtCf$#kMt+#w^e&_Fg`c_tKeb~Bx@A3V+x%!=z zK5&t^$+qAYdIlZ3SvBR*t3na?99JOOq3n!{_`Kg$%3`&-E087!&ZcRWs_k!!=X`$o}+&-wzGpA}T7@r{V?Cg3GVp=R+muOFE`d z)mr?i}U_x$04^iTEYy_e+7TZHiP(L1o(t%K-JRpjm8bB!o{3{TI^Ccb-P~R z4p1{;p+)q2~?`N_BTq8xY6J8jMA<*s+TM4dl z(Tt9~kev91d0Q}Ykp^ubUVL(KGY+_4lYTmMiG2g>$6Rr{B1M<)5G>}+36~78s|YiT zn9M*DyM*2L!Tu2GvUA0=g&MCcX(S9q*)38gD-KnWFDwtQ)B(AyRqLxyI0}6j49w|@ z9cG>W8*b=&yHZr|^?|W;O(EVEAaL^Z|!siTq4l8DQe59v^|$59k}ktCyP$W$NO;XJM86- z&$IQ(aI64sk&=)Ne9X#T%yO9uqWptDRDV|`hX8nl#&Oq<;`}a|Bt;s-?5y8KCO0ik zoKK6UX`%UAHO0`fpZu$$$v*VIgF`Go$aoYiayl!2btLkIul2Ss{kIO-9g+iPTGLWS z1VpJw(`jp5((1Y$6d_>TaSF6yn43sik%TME~Z3|ok zcmJ#_FJBXEo;2N7CP2tl3Y}qB2~Izo_TUAAv1U7~R5k|8fOfip=<#*~gpKEY8v~Q8KG93_vdnEqYk{W$&8NNyzW26;dj{l=x#n zdqZ2csRR<(k3IPLoepdZ?VGB1BkyW}@}#AQWbiBsB*8~Ju2*R3PPPNzUTram{>myH$Ofnq|SDIAJaiKTHe_bC) zqze&dgW`YU>@bMXhf%r+SJ2R$>mceyyts2*^AtrLyF@1-7j8A4KqphAnl{~(3C>YV zWuZ(xEY%n~k3E%KxR(QZJlJ_yyL}NTqF672kj06DB_u8O;G!0EKbbuw+TL=U8Y-GL zHnXEr973C2g%p$BP^LsWz?UKOx1+%v0f3eYAh0o*QZP8Nu~gNlH{q-~yu45U5W|$% zB51c%Pn|b=s1^51QCcwM_N>z`E@em(c^Q*4*$Tn-aj~I3u2L(ksS#-16A1R5;24x= zgH1jeYM+h1j=?|g=KA-0Axe;FEk>%1iuC)Vc3d9dR&eYQBqdBWm10fPuAF~aa1+Eg zTGZ7_sTU97+ncAWf(MOHw>fY1e|tp_olgGC-A?=e7WyxeWbr z^HEBj*Gy2}kdj+(K%`_P7r;G3+Kv|es3AC8#>J6m2WDZxuP{Fgd6LI1Zti;iid)k! zq{T*k0jGil4@{Hfh+@ITy{71S0-I#0q;DfPt&g-bO+5n`u-DBeLkvyyd-Up;k|sZ} z!y$5oBMc)&4X0>pmU+C8FspO9fog%f~M|gt=V$PW2$19Ud(z zz*;ptTfXG<@hDXi-~f=S_lv$9yRtHY5GJsupD*(ud3&Xgt50{q4on_isk}x}+cDjO zLO-bbg|kuREn1rA^U~M@Lm`B=;bDZ^!Euxvl|;Y)WF; zr;=e~V!d=ce#A$LmK*o8PXe9H6h&Q738T5m;9g3uzU6j(FC;lM4Hwdf&w{U=LQ4~3 zSJXn}o)3Cr{=5g}D)V<}}^ux2rmB3~B4!XI%HQ zPklh&VUdTRgFvANM5tdE-8g7pEHX+HLsKM(__Csjs@9Ub`i?r8cb(FVCk{K++OP6u zRSaq*Tr7_X^A?_*_BtcPeYpSB%UAwQ}s!`8j>`n(XWU0r_%?H&XCIy67wj{f`MAIqqaCfy|pt@z_*M{9$I=y7g9GM@h!ENryGv#r(Y zhmIsrNy6-0+I@aQtt2;=_&t(iHYQ6aS5-d0dkWbtXc?Ddt>bk#v90xVT>DS`{D$Np z(h%K%sv~H$w)eQwe#6&+9KmCL)_ysE$Ny z@UOuMW$7=aPb1;LpeYhsT)I>r%(-U{U%&cl%M-sq{iV=bp^ZH*fUK#U4NnaDb&lRYb#rU(-0%LB9T4EpzWcK%GRdF6clyVBB1A7>4fHcD z(|*gN5Tk$?x?)S>rOSTl+77ZPAC8NYOx;5s`XrIM zix9)BGxZSNGFwq!NQzEkkR_`=6>Lt_Skcu%=9CWL0zPbliJUiSQ8r_ouJC+GEF|WN zcTWwY7dBLAlHov=6r{DLqy6 zW{XCA2&$kw%$$A@@K7AZO1~eOZ1#S10ULxduJ&N|;-D13=uh*zC+w7yVP3nd#u}?$;;D7(?xTUKTiOrWVZo&y6y?>PT&|Z|- zp%-hXH}oJPMW=;*Qq#+Po!LPXt(cCu8kas~@li|jkb2#Wr1cZ!H@&jd*VX8GT{K)~ zTqsiA@MzN&(Nhvq5`rhn7?gZlBEzhq+UH)#a14aZh8SUvLp4{B{t6YJ)DBaYlb|)O zGHp)~pKwJHD+bX8j^N%)EX2=L#we>iX73SanaYv}@DkNyv~OZ&p@!yDtcrP73$=_| zUcv!HZxfv|CPa#(J)~EAh>fA%J@~_wVL>{aTj5yg15w0A^@~wkLNqIN-PG(%va8qt zB|UiC)}sIu4Xyn4&wl1@9*$kf6+;PmmoV79b(E9h2?I+@m899imX_Qm58_! zwZ9+v5C32@F8NPUL#o8KDEP9b=uLFu3iLSGAjkhcslGlgPXD9M9u;37Gpj8G>?StO zSA2H*i}*#caOjB66gMAC+Wdh}ZT~GmmFr z=ovGobWL2|faXA< zf3+bx&^62Z*@tSC(I>e2eyWD&G%@O_Q5|>{{&S=zHHi?Vb-3pNPV7|50d=32nHRo) zKFIfaB>3jhKTx!wfsGsoQ$q@4F_SJ5WM2>uu5b$&O?lf4@)_r819Mf#ZiiGfLTlV zV!_u>Vec&35l3e(O>M)F$a6R`WLJ?j)(;~c>j}V5G0XIyA#*82(7i^)uL_jmUzY7K z5NtN@*`khGMkXR(T_ihZI$xw=2UQX#=&+x{yxwOgXs^lOj0;KOnh#8*KS^K0v_lI( z3g-tV5Yq>w2Tl#qB~I#VJ9jkNx1T7J1)Powm}ROscD7rJ4wE}<@rNkO8Chdp-b zwV`1JW|y-&*T(yTh75sUIR9*6hOd_tW3!iB0y5_qmIRdMAPZqnIrNS0bp)bBs4A5M zAk!XX852I6^-84^YJF@bF22xvKkbLb$;^{_%0S}pOT^dBXpH~TZ4{y+?EgLp{Tu(~ zDSk&u5O3U!iX?HNPpS2LZcuw$l0XcPHd?f6F~=(Gs01?O#i05JE{0Es%^+)H99o+n z)7)!fZVq&~65#PkD`;{dI>!nvkTXK1Jf-MdtE}((fu(mPpKg6ae$eHNgeXN;ZKNxj zC4)=CDS}m1^2Cv7#;Cf4`1BTu;0M zDjfgoA#dH7?PYEj#5Ya%-a7Hc^o#P-v=$o=0=X)`vJJYB8!36S{SM9^O!A zhMfw$D%M6Z0YXm}(UUkkrmjgL&@qv1sDhwSf>0)91kj$Q@?WsRf1tQh?RwTlkoSa4 zlhfGDlp+qWPKJUIqls=;v{%BaB?Lsj3O=og5xt-ON<{ulyiEC7l-6RbN@Y?2;CA{g z;H71y7Q_?Q&-Dt?7ptag_ct-UVu>SyQPp}~G~Cz~Oe+cG6!h(!oz~dQr0j@%CKG+< zJ)Eoj@n`s~Up&nFlJD)Tzw7+o>yV|3+}CAka(@cHZfQN1YKohSi8mHci2UkL(?UcE zXG~G*5V43{{FcS?8Wj3K%@?<00*?9qf|TI%is#aaWiMT$0q)0rr1}ofUf79-scwp} z#f9LJ2Z()6xnlX3X>AExs>-9;GV7cjLkj}`=)*=iuPTlhr_{mJseDZ0*xZ!tnUZ1B z9;`{CAzFH`O%>5=mA{CaE5xY>S7#VjJ=%dvJ^VXukwR52`- zOi45qFglFhlZRlvTZ}Ml*0&mIVV(%+;Z)=)i|<-<-khcc*60pmYmjdGTR8XH#p#P` zn9E)3ydA6h|FR;@GFZKPcTsrrZ0bobuJO4t0(%oR_8H4Dj@(PH^YmprIyhs*LT(Lw zF?r2Io=?vXv4epIXh?zCCDd#^JSa4u$amm@!U&y*2hp-Mku8bEV|Z2%faK6ny_+yT z*K2T+9dnbpR7YZxWcp>~^LI=m+cH4K!(gavJB;5Cnm;Gom&%lS)m#d#iPFm9RZ%)z zsgOalC_BkSQhYf(M-{VhpRW}HoK^9c`5O1`<+i8^e}L|&tOj<<5xYZ8EG`i?{g0Rt z3Ro@71`})8-Lk02?fs;!i4^>vu2!e6&}y}&|sQOD2`<6h35V%_Zd*nYLN$1gv+Fv{W z%&I&6w=!m~lV1chhPHYEX?8UE{j}K$9JH@buU{~=^#mY`90|cRaMp3kl?EffV0!lE zG_@;V<{Nx-r@MAgNl2SBVPhK8FgEklbzx*&Fxd8CPK;9Z*k706pA@-{bJZk_;f+S# zBZl(eo#!N=rFMDZMkpw|1nQ`7BjLVS)YX0}9y0HczQcIUxKeNA5=@1O(k9w&dl;us z)2=HQ(S1qzMyQTJGOU09m{c9W+JH|6dHClW zhVL%EMsk2;toLORG*smno?8;TQHNnz$1Su)mRiYJ0Rir%|Dg)j5h|T%`PNJpdwxZl z3X<6AvG!pnt?D2|p;EBNU;_3*Z(KdVv>}&=_vjH=do^|`QAxA!JU&;Uq4>(A<4yUQ z^(HuL@Oqf|mXwet!Nq+M1R|uyFW? za)!$wjDCYtj1_&sh5=8l+S5M|S|4tPWT0($vd5vIi+{4JF@tfy)pJF4ZrKXviWgC* z>?{ZU$Emb;C{sdhUK(X?S{KId&9yrNK2ZILwAraAZ&U`iT6f;UV78&_-xi%1jpL1! zJ7Ot>ewZH9ppE<8T~lEt#Bps>)~51B>!Cb-NQ8OZ} zl{^&m6_mf%q`bTsN&}?EhDWYp)z+FF zMdGyzQk5pzg3eFK7XhSCc|ODG2+YMNNV%>gA4p}FPS#UDT~OS;y%d~;Z$2xe!{YBc zH7!ItRa^`Bairb5sEE{ZqK}X7hjIvY&5nGQ*}3hc(ZM)n^1algSasF=JUn0|k|cpt ztdvO9X!|?-xpnoN^;ERA5XaH!1>HX$!+*k{i(l3*H zy_6i+t9ZM980)XF2GN=D2XG+&zl7^}>Ep$R->;)@cXe3Q`X7CxMg3dHhbgG)wu-w+{W9f5Fq@1i7v~cT_!h%lPbL zzcoK8CyLaC@`1sF$`jdl?|NQO4uYdQwpC_N$KHDH4whJHnW9PH7 z&Tib$jbW*W7nSn=_S0|EFLvN|mXF$QiQy`L+&)Aj(%!$MgHrel`krS8kguu%RI5Su z)!6IrrfV&E%a>$x=kBzyw`3uGV=sHhu5SNL+<5xnq$kv>4(*}c^y7FH4_`|zhTChY z*YX$EgP!KLiXtuQ*Sf^qSGSi~FY#AY?)?G4m+1$Xo<6VhfnG5Qy3C7m7OD*0&RrkQ zS6p-q+P8~N@9`(<<7;i-m!;QpFTex1`B%KpJcMuW^LhJd|K`6wHua+K{aIw{S3SMo zyUm1Na`%5>!?J60%P+!2>T(X8N=!%3UWq@BdA$68XfI!3s{WXK+VT4>(I0*p&uYf~ z@Enwlq6j!hnPt~C#eeO4a1q!1`(NYF&82B-%BP8e%*D0KoXl*E$8=qbfGfQTKRhr# ze6>XUqJkZVUVva5*Xb<1r)!jP->_}=iBez-Iwa^|CHRuHV_?K8mDrhga^$Z1UuZ-Y zmo4(;>juF&^5h$LcT}2FhSgz2(YexX_1fE0DHJY|ed{9`;q{KD8S>W~c2^!AB5i?+ zQcNGU=v;L@0`ymqxz0mE-zkhbatB`zFK^H7(nnza-N%A zMZb1waeJ?G7(-m zsA&^rmz?><3uHbyo^P|;Hzm8R8nH9dUZzeDZWG)K*>_)_zJMM-x|W){3J5qz`|(spOaF51t{db(_Avc0ZGpdkQs*@A%M`EivjmiTquP>_&M_($&nT zV)O;YyqNKtkdUy85<#pWv2vT*UeGQx;Vv!v%%4qEoQ#ao2(4A_kctN?_nM4l_4;!v zzCw1kh(L+IwfGG9TYj4!US)dtn1;h=S;*X`h_AbeK0JMKR5jHZ6CK$|Wzh|8@``68 z>3KdP79~z4zW6pdd{dIc$lVX(RkxYpMQyhlCTmepfCIR6Fp8NEJW713xRU-0%C$tV z+MJCx#mbpPKBO)x@a|3ZO{75q0=jK?UeK-UsO|4!doyZcxcZ<_U>^IQVhUSBS0jj6 zeD^0bLbnxYl;8as#ejcgJJu@_i_e?I-sXwlCr?yBoMnlYhVRjOwTVp);8AAfS>j*! zN`Rl+TyTzDP&S?F3kc5VHXpo@&GH4w%^KbI{2LTsvg1@D-eO(r*w=?CgWwJ(L$G zhuOqVWKobWahug$WmfkDA9M+gsT47Mo7P=S4OBF$#n=VIla&ud{lr6_c^v@5u!oWX z26XkQ$XcGu^t#RNZdP^|b?e1IFq~36q;8ol7rgyGZJT=$Yh-Ar+^1*@h+7%d6y%p` zy%{?vBEs=LFnQQ?E$|%5E~{j&e4E}~Tw~VKf}95K-RXbUrgzIt)46AYh!OLgsMT)S zxp?Y8_p!N!FkWD0cL1%(8-nJk4t4zIjR>tXhy=84(%jZf^EH z&v%Y%qdw@EO?E;gBy_VQsENsWwx;HZA_3SmMY_7xC{ERF+PU)XQ^Z#?X}!>HEBm?1 zKQ}A`&+(zE`%Tmo6t&F_kA97hFUk~>WF(v4N(^CCwn1pV5>U*1CdwTA&xipx+;+?l3X!X?XO6yNCA5?*uKj$)IXW{zdT7x>9TpmEZ4dUqZY*v+ z5(}B>oOf@3EUGfpCGtsVGDC)(fAYd^uKx~Fc}xx~_(?&Pz{^~;K1y~3>f2rk?Dtrz z)7hlArJbMkuR+^%Ye^|pK&oVPt?0Fv}9NBEe~pQjw6+85-Vb!;P+u2#|b zXB1KfmTX)&)0@7OTQ$?VCS0ncQ`tfFqwe>RpyJ54E!RWOww2>DsjtP}kp(O3{{HMM zI`O-|_ss6>Fc`ZmgF+u2R3mcj6W41bmCj|a|wVYyXPpp5sd zl_o-R7ykb2Gi5Mm-ed<^#k?9y{N!6vOQ?qOjI{<1{cIm5oVbXcRi;{;RkMPMn+iqv zc7+^>f0DdrfVeEiPad#LBE;#i#D1uBZh3T!z*h=JfU*jZT4e$jpsf?0Tso0D_$9xh zLKFCYrHJN|$Yf61^CyBBMjO>k)KH5GU?OzW;R_Z%$oSYMJ}U9|DWjZ+kH5dUC&zj$4q%~me~p%a$PT3+ z|8^)T{0tvgVTJGuh>)u){DOw{te;V|&7}zcmMVKE0j5OA{M(6uk?NiL?ptj?Rg+LN zMCVi8b`4JEA`s+z)v9CdExOhDBo;Pl9Z5MLMjcdHDcop_GF~YH@R$RLli*CD8&mFc zw7x8#Ay^+1%5x@BR;C*jnP2YD*c>IH{ZQ$&h3OZ>an;30sCD!`6R~8GYF>k8hS9J~ zzY)4EYrbNJ3bgUE%81*w4O(V{19@AC-wPn8q9#UyR26~ z((kW_jdo3{iz?Lo;+vl??8Oi5Psd+j#`CqSSM-I-(auEb{O|p-(s|Q-vvKV=Un=2x zxu9?6?qKaU+I3}j+7Lr6;5gGC$;zm zII=C$z7n5}{VU7>{y>dRB4uGHIb^X5Z{t2js@;1`#% zUq-Uog|yjG+sG4dyv=ixnPUpOYSb`sy<4b8Oq-gw;0duPp&Tae-ii$GOc3 zK8D-2-Uhe3sVl4_z6&1{TA(eiqj0-PEB?m8_vs`AL1w@@o6tm5PlZH0XbYMIv})p7 zK972?pWPE$SIX}Y>i+lxkp*RP<)!)z`vqnynf$_s;TLSGPCm^?e_Z#U{N_*fH$|Ho zElBN$s@WjVj~sgZOF#dBy>fbIEM-`+Y@G=fhpO4^9)9T;;Tl88B5`BA5PnDb*w5&@ zKP^fYA{LuW;ZB$p%-TNSgYEl3blr4GC5Dr3jcPKs;_lC$gffAxKcFop!kTJHMzP9` zbc4y(p1XebOJTx6tC-~jA??YBp&rvc~^7tVpEZ2;tPF>qDX>4#s)+D6a`W(fHUgi(G-|5mhq%_XibfrwiTa15F{6<|HAb9D4_q+eK zSbs0Em$!Ky=z-9!fsclALT))kmM5+faF=2-tekP1O8WrD$e5>s!^^!+L*P@I#|#wL z=r%aMFHc7g4owN}Ol-5pJ!uwk<6OuuTxn>9matMr1N%2 zt!<@hFZl-Ulhqrx@ao-_ZB4lfn&f=3QGslB&#K&`x@s(WhLCJNyYRwneZcFzCDRM% zZ6lRcO0af+Hm8BY>J}wmEHy0@1Ev^)CI#Tdh`y!6!u5*bG(25^&>5tuInz4laxQ^M zbB2zik?TtQGN(VirPs*2@zMduwhwYaSB}Nv{x$X!ZQoee76=XtiOT~35w-!8uGU&d z;WLI#reUXMdiEIgMJ-bEKE1lXZk`1kRU>lgr0>z_JEHX(ULPrRm^*y4%KbqDltRFE zlyz|Z1cp})*lcszuN48PZ}CHCAt5rU7j&S*J6-R{^0f;~7Ub8sp~Lx5<+=dZSLA@z zkdbI%^Jfi)t|npgnE`H)N++$OLq7>xbcw~f7=y`pCr($FRFk5aQpTeZoEY z+G~KtkaJXAXjgNEaX$0*30jSoV~WZ?^g!RN@+L`K4%diCaNT~U2_}>B^v77h+tP=i zxbFAOhDVK_bMX3m3bNEt&hvmT(p9Vcvl&O7E>m2CcPzRrWoxGrcTTR@S0u9Vt8qdg-!jH}jN$iFHZ z!l*;_eqqx_7a;(PZ{#$k(L1u&y-0w@fmA756%Hxhx@q}JxMmzH0%YH5dzF58COszy z55Jb#n532EhS{$hx}S0LU{G9A(vIYgjjvbu21c;h%nNHjaP<}W6ZgfWY>MmA~j>wdK;jS4O2)(4M_~`nn19{(;VDTXOKWOZtuddw>pT>!H}4j zw)izt;VI66Y};MlhYq#9no_px@PLq3aq1VJQ7+e(^IkOuF)fZZZ>1{dopwWKBV1Bq z=XM=expS2vxip7Jp-O#A>lPG!SCPL#46uY*vGgWrryqSFZo9Lhh+wq!-H$#9Lq<85 z7U_S0j-E1pf1R>&o&gjN-{sll+FP6$oczW|tdS@#V~#*tL#NysQ*_6%YVx-w@hso<)1z<4u{@_6dFrWQq_g9XUzvPPQ2dL2Y1Ad>2xxMBd z@Sa~(^20QAs;{;E0SIcj-2JtMeRtlXE2^GMF+i0}KFxyvIaF@iZ@Qgi%9%+JUg;+9wWbVqYa+|yeiO_Vey}?Nr)~M9JeOWJE zSygd@1MmnR+L-KPbMC2#Wni=xyq)|Y6DRD+Ti=)MQ5>7GP^DP%8|R$%KkrX~o}0%a z+=M&LEnDe+DFq3|Q+27#SbT(vwf__U;>To)>b~R*d=fujHtlfk<|*VWI-5~=3ZS)P zQkndK;ehTCBg~DZj?pRn8l&_WCed-TfNp%Llrm|@0PQ+|MqkiqvQShmmzzn@G8Gy; zqsWOaHW?&Fc$jd|NbtBo0R~MUxj{Icx*IyZvyFQy5Y7A3Eag}3(zVvag}(y-CXx{j zh$D6Y6|fUhmi{qu$&F)?66 zzM_h9q%1$>RR~VY+;KWi7ul+GuvAPLtV*sF53u&!t7M~vWsT_yUM4q?UkamQv);F~ zgJo)31dMa92`1EPDGB6Wo=7yKmIP}>VZF{Ib9E>y#&tZ@?`@7mVE2wy70PR8`epne zk-8Yq$A_RzSQ?TJu?@(_I#bSvuxS z=xLAH$W6}2&7I_OJOJa9>3TEYM*}V2me$Kx&DQ9D(We;A=yoADc)=8tM#Gx(L4q9u zY#cRsq5EdbPtpd*GHvJw(T0ssby8gfyiTabXCYS@Sy(HBAa-j}h;*o%XgWC5$#l0D zQ2Xe&*Q!mxrF*I3Gu}6#flpHPku^{?hfGDpya){p4tHI+RdLpW(a*N?GGkIycYAWr z;5_llDwLjr3yHu@q9gadp8%6M=0^wNC@|I8Cy_E&X^1HeZ_{i6|}5l4Z9gGWC#9 zn_x7mOfEFjCbQ8w=9Y8==$@4?#t+Y=KTFS>pc9s{SsH>4Y4#%%#arXCHx80x zFksrW1{{?;@0w~bT-nU6OfM6W;d#><+ZP!e2+}%XdbBWo9K_sU-0(H}$#P>00n`Be z&va`{zyfd&lVgvWo5XZTStx7x$cG^r!^CbW`Uo)16)>jVL?h5H+Vb4eB@f(z2od21!0~Xah6PWgiI;3|h=y*VatTRyzH( zVvi=LRu5$eh95{I>KJWT`8RNO2Lan!EIG_B=xk-O;Zx#wj+jn$-#G{H_VDDNEPEJq zXzPe+!!2YGHJ^P*n#Li zIN$&aCoK(hB`ErUsSn*CUcWI6ybh{9;c=5v zWXPtEkjI(q4UZ`&hHyG45ky`S6^Yy9Lxm);iWRl6HOeJB17^H(L)Vqbx{J~Yk5Uz` ztpg8EZZe@}J5;$UIx?M}`3^e|h2VT6IE{)-Cnl8Bdo?g*RSF$O(3%P6VF0AXSfbUNPhfM) zNY$%0ZjzN}I(IT)-M8iW05JjxOV!HD>6O6u!uO4`O6*?LDk5f|G>y@@jrAe2P2Ps7 zD}8%c!=Sd=I40=GjPr`fE}2!}`8s%SrF70^(>Mc>F%z8rp|x}N)DKz!`*xt<;vD69 z38c}(FS&~}pAtAgf}J}Fy~WPcW|UUbE-jU^cXO_N$CE&205fegG-#Cu%S!B=(LANh zPpW5Di$D4)OW|gj?jG~Qw5=0TK(g|VGVR@8Hx?t_X6tfW>Ov+ZcNMmfp3YQKl6-B8 zZYr}E2St}QjQ%DA=4~X=23JKZC>wpcpE1jkZ!uc@!l%Sb_ph)e#d-ke^|`~!&)jNN zHgq}6WLcF>rb9vtWlU3?SAYZZnQwRBIi+xCv~$xv!hr26ndgpF+XN}N%*@n6H z9-^O|_lL;cw~T^2LV-ulQHC2QumrkoA9DO97IMbLBR0n=k}AiYlira8yUv?TjkE{n*~m{Oah3J9foD}jH>e1>O#@hTcLB)Z7ecyDna6VuAnSA( z$1OHxEp6d)DHH?XDoDVd8dIf6E&4Qt?;#Ex!c)aVF3R~8oam`wUK2!J5X`iyE318^ zN#fnlpoKOjNqB{7Mc|9d_NkO%fd>l`o6QROZz{9SkK2I^Yd&RAJ5#B4AyQ)~?u2%Y z`%g*}X*hlc?W3X;K+kE{ui_o$l!j6gpk6freLKlUu-A}<4{bX2bT4m2;1+&;>HqKl zDUWe5h*H61TW3YdOa8^M z$n|UAqFnRDwG9iW6;o{wCXDK2wauh-q4V!bBduzljwX242{|c;d$X| zd>CHk%DBpKD=a;7!f2{{Wymt;sh9?~%rC+1eZFxy6ZytXpO7`wP(AAgyrS!#Y5Vmk z)}f(1LN!)V^saUaRrRl$NIv|cU~Xee-mN*yte+SeEn`;pD!tdcWR!643ew9xM#TJ- zwhyr})4|kiRsd6&LXV%|zqxa!Q0+t&JJG?;THi|m6c#kUtC7RUY0m6szw<5mK!;I< z4Mg%5{uJf;#ee(nvlXw~<`M&e$m3C3xa`n;#Ew)o#$UB1qD_APBBZaL^&+GN8k2e} zt@7I=-yDX)UD?NRa6sBiqa7$6Zi_19?x^2Xw4Quq%9*Y}`5UR+lBPom~*4L%KJY}oNZpRUO z9*xiPB~Z~jn67Twr0L^zpn*TZbnh`J#^zim4MJV?CvJ()iA`W7!E1X_$=EbC7h@(G z2NSW3UkxjatItjM*2=7LasbV)?8?Ib$(_4za(S&#N|j2K585(rOJ@39=d+CKMJn5y z@>#F860#bwik;}|NlT6!i|X|rty^x#)-!YxQ><7qk@grBc41Wu=60lCDY^KozUzV~ zdtl8ZSsqn%x;-O8u-Ba7rQ{5t+VeWtTj7!@#Di<^6!j%T?0EvB%@~8dw86 z{zV;dglKySJjyDZ{iSg2CcU-?xl0vEB?fEP3}JF9CN6SoB9R2(%{yGr6AeMtP za$9gy$E14lft&|^%>0!KYb3lx+R+Vdt6Xs|gf!`*xZ!THYzn%Y&tQOZ0|S8M>5au6 z0&GRTupby`Rm;<|k*W1`Nz;qbE|0XLlN~M&+UjoBP$W;sAs63>I;Vu&QAemd)=>p) zXqely$&xeVWFs-b-C$r3)}$aWw>l73^X=~S=x*zGm~M&)ZT90VBf~C(%PYMFB4h5Q zqucS5`K!6HTGSNv(6O=+ZYWdvS4FkAHs^*0V7XjUfbRn}Vq30gfB2!(m?D1x8`N-m)xMat^GBpsHjWTj*A)Z8jO#84R27Pm7~0n9 zNW+$)ZGc~z*obXh`Z{oo05r(Lv5{y&I4?^Ut7WmEvQ{&zwI#mcF-y#ywG1CGRX|EO zdRu8xu4R9C8TYRFTuw1~1jwaJ* zE1&?eF$%wxX?sb~mlR5y00Z4<#<*_(^8!5!?Os|c2C?Y8>PW=v_|fN$-_55Ka*kN^JS}@cGq&1 zryffH6$7pLRI@IY_VzKO(YZfcP)PL`fj}Bd*uaiyy?YMSV>NBJ6qRpR3e{Sdh$OiY z7pjU(5L5-Wd#*%Zl(k}L{O-Gf`^TKhOl#I@bVC+p;O`R3>4e`+YM2-FpVG52Q2w`h z@==CkN_#-WDelicso$Yef*Ych%q*b?Ut(NQb(q8F#=`~1If5SRV8FBJb+a*8KN;28 zCKRN!?ap^EtRzRr<1xo4Oh`(ZPRTvVJ}ARQQSRUg6MpNgLFOL3+Du7p6rd8Nthw~U z3~Dxj7g-?lk&cbde_-FwyJ7q0EZ%yq6Dp;jddW@jpl?TEIN}#dl-Wvl1-OF8<#mOh zKW&CYF9ZziYz4=%9~2THgv+^{1kuH?v zp?cl1s>Q9zlBANMNz%KM4s|~1VW*|0gy^#tGUE5q{=O6(G})x1nqHk@Ci51VEdMj%xty$z*T`z%IA@o0`M2mOJLE;bS#{d*{QaG3;3G z@JdJ$*azlXK*n{Ow;yVCpb}SIr50*E)0G3L^eJY_t)iG28k*9aibAYj7uGXdWv&Dq z3iDHC!Y*owNp6@{1UV&ISy{b3-!x`FqfGrCY2o{`-JerrQy5c!hq9L|6!2BTO?yQv ztuw#g_G$Ekmve5gO|zIpYMBmNk`~AI=QQ=tjq5S2BOCCLbmZDVS#7N$R25)ntaiEX zH8a&27rNT;Xoa)*{qVu}J;awW`Hl0(JisEn<~`c4y{{L80SmGwb;lE;yS9QQgmzxT zuB<1T0e^-}jLMxp8S&1vEv9lxw^U5mpG7V=(S24-aCWKfC zEJ`Cpfw!MT!hXRMERt%ftT){!lQfT!OIdqE+=CfsufXLXbRH@uxw;T$B^{^Q4s0U<##3E4k_xl^l-e6ea6HtySaV2Jqii};AEy{N zH!v#!Gq?D=?d&ZhwPO59ngu{_>od!l;aNUB)CqxNjC?|GvjXPnY9e~d23I{)vvc1y zLNhIgJ=?O;-^RHDj!yeJsn#|hYAt}v3Ccgdm1xM&wxWPF@rMurwbt0v0XRIL=B)Hg zTMw1Q0Pf=@xT+$ayIT_{8WO|E1Cz%3)deBs-QT#{r!0-!s#!EL3>a9M!yq7MZ;HZP zlwC0}XVD2=jx+Mx(hh7AU0uiFnUmpWo`9RcuQ>L{)qs-87fsa-f!TDF4 zfVU)9`lMb$J&WQjx)%YkE|S)lg0cf0A-BBnwBDUgU>M|_q)v(?&y_U2Y@ulDLbSIm znzQb5bKYc>9SgA%ty5bAPOCZ9JoXlNHbyM2v>~t@bN=U2&KCaZR>)MOXL{XP~e9izy|C+3;p4%qAd&u5d%6L=a7c#TwlL>9h#(v~eFozE;KsI9v)3Z7hTr z)Lgs`)6PP9|3suzy1s?iMZ^7idnnmlRqnf<)&Tr8zqJ#X@!aig)QP1!x@A6LcP?{6 zu~hjhHAtK}JC;Rk$wT5GWJ>}}Gj6l(nPPbywa9_=Nx`^uiJi#0Y~JL66In5@`84i9 z3)-0+_%E-lmAmRF@-LFu_Msn%0#Fu)^g7p`A_u2##;uI;%^X)NV)Q|hFz9jQ1x|4G zy`iwP^%F3umH0FO8+D(BmqPR7!{-jSBeqx4L^nu6FK4h9W}7I<^s4?y&QZRMJL|fU zaGr|8n!PsQ<>(7^y4+{$2b0UAJwusdd5RtpVy!@PWv70g)Zq|;%3Lr{R*obr7cqTE z7%)d%FFqocwdNQ7){%HuuZwOtwn%EM0`Rv9xIzTU1ggyuNEcrTk_8m43|NM`zP=<%caU@LlO$au-beCg@SU5=nl|Z83 zkcdRHwF*?;84;FTJf>?VyRg;GY4U%0^UMa5f+lJWiVdamWGbw#&xaM{eQW+y;_j>-6@z6l%C~4q+(cD{nXhmzGHn_L z=Cj6emKH*Dc2Qb}ohxV-r!33>nm9g|~n6n6pkkV5L`GSbKW?FJG>>T}rwPf?K%AC72=#(=%}S=NEG*B#wQ zN1{ng@1M+Jl+9MupE>ANG&)|%6kFXa*zqgRk`lnvr zp(nP4vKA{KDfg5+Z$a{!t+KSIgNwl+ErljbLZ@lp(mE>4-#C`?c2p8tRppu0Ia!PK zeZm`oPbC3`?~`1h(r+14+h{Xto_uiO1w|>gkjF^A0(Qp#=1uua6^mcSq(q_hSc&y47ld=TW$+Nj~@k#k!VF#}u#O$$1@PIMDdv;ng^ z*nYCFl_R@8O2TI# zoXf$LN5+sJ{4&pCawA0tg19ik80)MdLL^d4C;+wY!QDNSJpjNwLibi?0Y{e*AmSE8 z>A(&>6S7zJ?!_&!*}Ff_KJM4p4xJ7LTcg;nz3)9c@YjtHjPmDcx6A%igOe3Cy1Z!!0 z1r8!azl=0~95JBrf>vXApekabWUYP@TO-WnLSVv==xfKM)OR(s;^Jr-!2Yz|Gf$#R z$$+t&Je|Xn=6L=*cYgP?NCY3hZ*&My(n1?@$XvB&tApkY9j|TW&ATJK+qjjmbmp=H z_wt%J^4}K?PZ-YJf}X;5sD@3RTm2xJZD*!`tT`n+tTJ|03QL)|`B6>D&?yF6(>toG zWSJ@-um>h8b-JPT6dI6WXWuM4t3`U%KZ5%T^?})lfl(E|E1P#6!(-;N3x2kqCuEDE z6Oc@bQK2}Zas&Cc&r6Wws?@hvrEhkBA<)^c)FtQs%n&(F6x=yD19i;IKH}Zp7mwuCV}BtwsArB zm39!QEKZ*PZ^5i{cuCxc0jhJh`^(t^Mns_np|&N7>v#qr0E6aQ9|*O9jptg~+MOy~ zL3gT`@&j~0o_d}2AC!6+j~f+N;UHnzZAmPiHba|p{3B#`oZGNwZb$3&MMdtJ?DwNJ z*|M6)l*grnnUlgggSfH}lMdZhS{3jwC50a@k~|yNLOBA;oTg#7sx%Bc#YCN0 zediD*YZp2z;bu#B-UjcQ^fa$;5C`5nh_4t)1y@|_M#m-+$C&v!1!ulMwn|T>ExU00 z=EIMr+H(WbDFrM>MGDNpG22Lpud?RxC#B=*wAP`s>Ofq(I2Kna4P-#UQQo1vkdAGTPr5qz9V$}u z;BKL57Kru*0@MRCp#v%lCsOSfWcU+ewz+m*jI}yy8HUN@;!pa zL-JrfN)=o^8cWU_at>j|yOImUQPQ%Yq834X}=oKya29th;7eJM@;q&?e;5K5@D2?8N# z%v~X1llQ%_PKOF_m%Nek$WChIQY8t{t&AaXkXT<>N+L6*fxS`+?95L?#)O;FV5h4@ zyE!|f8fz_U-Od;RG9{%C6dx{x;divFj&q42I|2F5XXi~@BUlT0>g<=ZF^)kimNqI# z9`e%FeJ4IhcSspqeovjeQZtW7yFr1D{e>4SRx>CIZ^m7b z87U?rR6Q1YGJ6yxo6aOU;Ux^xN;~@89lTn9^TLFO*-=KPlnrKuXFT6!S!XYDNU25M);2wzTW2OwA6) zZiwNQG*+n-Iv%u@PJ9hBEK?(6*0W z4W>ch1=d1~NY2R^&=n6SV{c1TKU3zZ*tpH@(n8m^8$*I;7v;q<6rpcku=Vhh8b%*H z8YiHP%48U(_<@3nag^-n6o7#w3*zXBtQEktsiet(4q|;Y9NKl6rH_{vumbRd%5Ky$C zNlqUii=Fh1BIugl(j;DZi46xAr3r%EM1QinZ4^2S-D#=vPuW02jba3y8&`Rizx>Jp z8)M0Q)N~tth;`koQ2I|ma(ryx)y@1QRP%(0oHkfyj_rL<(-_DVPEALRj#CE;q;|!H zf{f%~PeRytIqSwa0*({f>EexX55qW#IMY*H2NLx|fxh+a{`T>`aYQK`{otHXezd0qD+oceg=I15g0hdI2PUHfB&Lf2 ztZLKv1hN`ZOBrH65v^+)$4-DN0os;pRRejp-_!C-blc{!-xJm~PAu^?|3Z1ixAdswgcNO4Dp|#t z!pSNNV&tgI4N4EbV#Eaco|5hiNcUg}G<8)ZM8%OZn%PVn;P!|c=hyt`kfK3`%58g7`00JIuFFEfThQ(q zwrf^$q!&0;u}p%4H=YGqTy|0Al+(0rHFTwiPVUClJR$^ETttOgEnT-=Up_0nML)TA zckcUy0e73Sjx)1+gzR$NJVkDq?|=W5Yz8fSozlXrFQEk8Y%`u~R0!$OGi;8>^}tip z@RTa5Efm_(Z`7~C3f$gOYrqs+al2_(WP`e!SJb?=bFu}q7L2ClZ)4fY@pK+qVdWwY zYajce?!W3WrrhTMxxH-T>3Y@VqS{cF%(MX?%&MmCG`!J?e4+r z)OQzY)NvcD_fR2Mp%O-p3pQb@D4WbB?}0?z5_>OzNi*~)`1Iw zOm9@IbG2wVi0>vH7L>Uu#~DfEkvX|&xaCZzYt>>mU*s889NCs?_xFBi`I?QTAxslU zi__JsGHdj}CwEz{(uK_20Jz+oH%dv*TESTX2}T3_MupFVV4Xj2Ho1uJ5k`GUI}U^J zuJ7COe89n?SD#!KLkkKw-;0j!g2$>l9f`^8XDZYa;d*n`g0a_GG!H?F!_g!wLl;3$ zW>p8_>{W&SESn1+cwo@lAVWI9ALNy_G^UprJLTiq40>{TH%8wK#hM9ZOw2hawdfZN zmIG!AVOp4zyz}j4V;;IGrQ_Fd57|n{A=5cRsB1LlF-r=V7z(guNJTUu8AJuMO$&o! zpKpt%Y{8nK$ZlVRj|aOa^FZU(+sm$rnoHkwqbZYPXO=+4>b+Gs(Xl>J7576 z_9u*q2;!azT_0YcZzwm~Sf0fQ^8-$);xL6Ju<1-=H=K89iJpi{v+Q-@#;6FuC0y%v zf6M0fo{WK#Nf&rzj`&Hv3`w4ts(qgVNj%SnB&2pB%xIgTXX0+($MZTD`knUv?2%rG zIOd8OpgK?$PJHwg86xTZsdQTMsjPXA02{9v-adj~5nT&)>L!9ZJs}FN6q)23=TP?V z)lWcgGEbR_5}1`+E`7nJMlC+(e8vEFHZ@aLh^j2>5*K4mcWiE9XmqNM9cU19^{2-r z+z~G6iV{aG+3p<|Nz1^Y*B+$#IEkXGBcCzP(~xvBb?ee?ZP#DD-8QRh~foh5IVkiSpTplSjw)1cE&R@=6vQ^=y0k!bQTO z?5V)5GBh;jyBBKv=EC!{9J<6S&6O)fb(4&7e-t8hvo-b}7lChy<9ae}ZQkKxg1BTp zfg4FFz~=00L#N}y=;gkl3u{*9D_%7qbp#d#gtOgcU97?0ygk8C*of)?XK1P_ghADm zl$9b$C=As)=LhnN`4tt1I4CZo07indNT#rrC0b^%SV4`lG|@lXR``|^AcWOWq_~o7 z$R3mMkQsn3jcf9kLA#+%m`Gs~H+89V!N^wW{eoxRjxkZLh-nS(lDbJyG63!QZLzzL zlRhInhDeg*5S586pf(!k$q|7`(igZ4Coj;wONV^f$ubqqniY`>qif)zil!yLUNP-e z{%oY7br`e59IJX6W}%a+!4%b@P2c&5#TSJf+R|%84I&C02&KklnY$WMn`J3!9q8{C zQ5yM*A@97@!IFt76wW#k4{VxtLFSxmW_hP1N9;ckH=@K*uebF*E5pI>Q{s?NWN$T! zJNS;gB_?V2XBAgth30v5H3B;JGWnb}5^9_6Y*`JQs`C%rB+Uqn+L$}DqLqp+WL0BC4UyjsGvTs_-!Mj?^{Onfd%=-1Vu89u9$NlM z#bA0DWQ4Rz9em@|Ar7?=Hn)8MefgmkNTlV*M4lg9qGA3sOxD!{s+~~_%i8mflERm2okGqD#+R$_PU6@1Y$FT@DXv{Lg(;ktdyWE;AgY6a>cQA!p z+{y3UP|g0}FKZtqTrd+2bsJ+|@tZBIRokGs%3qOamJ5}N=>o)_=yX>GIT~R%DV>!7VYg>QOOPO`|Q@AnT3Oak$)y+o;~1I_i9?Pa{cQ zL^84!=NKo!^NxnsSyP47hL1Y9 zEQuEAK@I@!K(Jx=oI`|ESx>+$LO*lf4!sKqk=zRRDgOlW+j3FzY)h^k)in~(#c5(0 zr=jKH(>#jaIBZF((bu%)r7R0}11a4bA^S{4PAQ1Q{=t88F170@1VKWD3dg>AU4??# zv`el>fG|lrPMvC+)5_^)K6hO)R95E2UT>YUg>W@Q=xI9E8tcH^C43>d=b<+g05xZT zMY)RXVVAbivhC&EHyvU5ymdx$hIjRzQ3W^kPwk_JF2v#rc;^Pjpjoo*Ppd8x@zZgP z)8Sd`;Fuv1`X^5PDdlRn>&AlAOg{U;mG&{mT1}~2#sC`d2(Il*9!rCZ=@LMlR=v1l zC0q+a8`OquQKGc1Zx>SuQ4J1mzYyhZ+5IV=yO!>GY{O9)5u~E0lan!o2s7KNjZ_yJ z^5!4N1`W83C(ccuLuyy#>dJE+rW9@1F!ZUjm61rZQQ*$zv>jo|WmwiYXa&9>b#wP)(#NS3mESoD7_ba&>3O@>?^Ftk% zBC?^)*Eiy#VG^^B*mT8IqiAe7fmLt~QKYiT0j)ciH(D-6hwU-vN=(~qhH7Pn(aKBe zLV@rpq{gJ!opLH_rDN^tT;+kWcuh4JMRnBPjvC!j6LySIJ%LWOZ~y{a1>=+mR`|JY zb~umHqx3w=Qf-R^e5SV-+W!23ch&!@Ak>JWilL&m-=GE@4OQ(Bnnr z3wf&4?=94asOw^w{WFLbKj8v@fZyz$Ge8Nz$j*SjaVJptf^F$wcL27^K=x)*u$oMhrDv&q>D^x6PKWrIh-l2z{dV zBn>d~)c@w{*;i{iSl#Si-YxPZ#;8*EKGIU{-!U=^35D{@li*ngR@>=Y9(lvYS&@-U z+N?Z5LAJ6x4lZmCAKmZ%-V4@-uI4JSf(GjSkl+wU9^T|t)NeOi6kfWUIEsA@EP*FD zUAu@_XJy?v+x>fw0bd?RMR3>66U1!OZU-scN}S2Z%TPF-6{<5^+y>!yIczd{m1I1+ zE0vl_rj)@sUd|lqKd23J4;~V?&&n0z>nI((`#UYclKi2oXa^ycVBKCMw=h&KzR+f_ zp|X_7ozM>y+-|oZQ?q>1kWS0{v)_7GpZ&UZ_3k^g5k7Br|53qSa!qQ6hgceZjw9yI z7^Xy#rFIuK#KX?hu7{!q1cNL+N7m|(pZ);?9lPg6#kc?-zb*A_$R?QmhAv`3hL?qm z;~cO`BUjb#IoGR0dd~JcMVvHSaPW6~rh{`@D-2&V0wdoT2v8b;@&uy|*S2>&89sjb0Y{9K+@ z#3)dj2c3nvG8`aAxXaaI;U^G+V*pNu3GJ<73%?@60ov}bzy@9ZL0UwY$?Z!CAviBSja^U zxuoCLbpT|IX)x&TZuy92-K}xTo(r=XTVHRK`yEmp8-OXwMxSXW(F3e^hwqyn>rw|z znI@O9{JadlZaqpT+#h{cedvV23MU!_T6)+Gi-^2kDCc8?%T9FG^XigmA!D$jN4utL zuBBZdHXK^D!x31vUm{U^y1W}hQGO+Ne_VR35;Jxv2uIYkEd5L*!6iHf;1bPw;m&F) zle#5`;gL^yY!Un0dg7KbB2T)m9Ro@^D>IGNmG=iya*~iH0_a{wWT0mCXt&T|MNgcqCnP8Jm1MteD}WpqJ({HgmzmbRg!yHbhMfC40wC&zg;SogY2bW;m}# z`BKL6v!s%h@3|0xwgl}FTgi&^PWlMLftZJ;NOoaxC0OF>y6)>|&Dw4JV)k+SO*7PU z6U3IACQrhy7tvXiFV6V{0BE7RGTfKWhvu$*2pNB`3eCzue?g(h+`zr|BL2x9SHeVf zzeTex0aBA6D#}rJFK(RCGgck}qt0KSpZV4nVNcS>8gzWcEfBtu;Xeuy(6wN6-ovak z0g6lv@k?+6$z501O^<&RO|hmk$79OO0FCSn(G4aAxf|w{7a?Rr2{!En+7%IL%(X4i zc{xUs5>`U)(fA@3N~dIGI%c14+#!Eev3seB<`_PwwQtaD08%BJVof_ps0?^NPXnQl ziiGhp(-FchqQ67m(;+0{lv4EtE*w*-(H}1$pUFuI^kL|F4W*K~=1j3(Rh}D0D3o(E zomcJ0WUUk<2Gi$(zG<&|S7584pmyCX-esC7O7|d6TQ?i_jEvdlnpUv}N0B)^9iF72+i5mBo{K2AUg%pwwjPl57+%?Khf7YnrZoj2gi!+~ zP(Yq<@4~8pB!A$9j_1JrZDD4AY#kGUC(|x1>!uWrntyin-1Y^h1a!IwWT*^Ynms}2 zJ-=E}N)tIlR#6BbGeJC{?zwE$aY(Sx8imTZ zuTDe(kuoXcvB5so%&S@D6QUF8PnbIl3zLr#%9F92uZEu!g`FGc3LZZ8Qm71|VxHAp zI!Zdv&t1pj%>W&j%YF7eb*k_Qa@cJQG=fJj%0Iz1^3H;5b%~ufze#ZqS-Fi7#Iw|8 zhl1ZevBR>CAwXy8rLr4G7)7dX5j1(|<+c?8>)eu7kpYApqi;K#&LX2Ot1uHs^zO0& zJPC!Qv7{2h;j$=aEYc#JkgW8_J4_S^7O`OxfXg`_E*<{5Tl%&i@4E>OMc!M0lCqY9 zPA*R<=6!@EY&zBQ1ykMsETC{58&^WPrlo)UFO<^{Wk7TVAda==Q>)yTtA@<+(D_%% z0UQWHd;-E(Ap?yHlP6I=7q&I8l4{xGDk~43qAnT;D{8}`CWQ!c10^($jzVvHTg<4c zYz+uQS_}juf0aX>uxM$i4xY3{Km(h)Y0SZw9eh4~E@A+&W0@z#>H934g8#R)2(dvV z+sf7eNGOb>tX87U_$eb0UBVz7vaaUPio~eO%akN3`rUmuoTB~1g(mJJ;85~U3=M-(DeJ)-%_)DQah+krwMo@Nb%9u!Q>1iAN z5rg+dqpo6k78yI~%L|dNRk887&pJ_Ja3`>%iJEH8qD0NgeY2JhofaTe~xLwyXRc>-@RZ`zWGctEz|WLl@rE` z-1@=`aAR_4=@-^;JIM$_?iRK&_DKOTR~Q^XPuXu(`#4tjeph4G2u18hy5cfHafPms z8Le}VRMJs^27(ncDAnLd)+okKP{UxQo@g@Z$jFYh1D zWgX_s4|370aHkINP7J{u-X`5ymWMVEZc&E^#qhu*XnOowUh1Yr6x|NRE2w#}8?uZm3;+iE7=H(xwc2RZ1 z28F$d<^gvJy!{COl&cW?rVqDjiiIyqDP<1yHTw7Q)n&b+&sAmZe?L_8cL09-2YuzA z{^6sa{S-f(dopJ9;}7wJTlT*Fr+@hH$3J|X-ExE(XT;l`A1Z7Pi{=vHyL~#NQg%z3 zh_oaZsfbvPMWKHb0CfOcM#>@;gJ0DcXOhoy7A2oaC{Yq^WD$7L$+Z~+&kBq)&^O!x z zRs=J6ua58uF-Ev9FkGl~Iv<*$wHxR$UVh2*4Hf1_WXi8xDyakE+&4v^%d4v%(RHM=yyr1@vau& z9;rAF`sW?gZEEAZUb#7RD6Y7mh$Zq7Kh64Bg>K*WNK zarr&hU49v;%0^$KyF)k})5k&meW3mZ~w|7pAgVu4iRD<}={y`FKlM+0^rK-(Wrw*F;k2 zlM2B7*(dl@NpLI;{fbX0Rvs0gQbS`Ei{eIi;p))qeQ=sblN{b7fRt~ZA7gUtvM#E@ zQomw~Ik54(RqHkzj+4go)2K`PYWEz$KvNg|gvH`_bk<7gJ8iZV^SbB`(1?YC-?IX> zg%urDjWzYb15XNV2gd7r>nZbjHt(T9=Q~uLjcumTGe*N0-Q?D_J|Q_%{ZFyZIS){( zG%OZhC{Va>V-Z@c_jW2T^f|AzdsOtLC|ZWCmfbmJj{bX8n=!9v4*i8(decRj^5 z>DyfWW=LeI92O$ejQuAQ>nAVx+Q@ux#W;6%AoCPZ4v~Ons*Zz>0HmG1=aTH1{(She z1N>X-DMkroC&8SJy6AK5-G?@)yq&;YuQcSP0w?22;C8~FYKDu}E3v<~xJa=*>h7W9 zJDRBx8;uT*mqAB%t2zP}wouakmpGnVdkxde8j>XK5Zn^0vHLTu2ASD5IozRKFUWaU ztUY6o7emUCKpz1*U`;0GPb@_|tjQ2*~r9Ljrm*$e`s$~L;Pi>^1 zPLt;Y5V*eGEgs$Yeg$I*O={0tY-@_X{j1Q-hdDhTzsc#b74Oe0{f~aldG)XKXaDm* z{lhPQ^79`9K}e62ZgBC;=>;vab-#43=eZt$d?tA+O)zW(E%{`8v9f0SIaU0W{~+lGt&XYU~F zq7RPDdf3h3Lxudm{q(QtjqQ1y#jhyh15%%Vy!aTD4fg%aQs0KZpx=4@;r^9-Pxd_*<(i<+ zkScGr>0q?qZ#sR(pSikR1}>IYq5{^`H`>Hpf~i*C##KSYW4I1Z<*x&MFtPW(ZP&vQxVsqR3Gr^DYU_wW$i0_3Q(Ti$$t0$Ht#=T`v z>`@v*a_4b>Ck7rZ!3(hs-2J`M9;*%kz3i#HkN4j2$^1_A#(1hMkqNzcAMYJz=YJv7 zYMROm&MZpqq_fWvNHLeG`8W;*92%$x1VJrm3XT}$2bLMK!Fz-U?_mdcO7&wp5yVVk6c&hO*I!yITbn0-?;3dQ8~OW{!g@6?S4+oXV30e=b_ z`8^NL6&M`^1VEzv_i^Gu9@Uq6QpTxNmkzgI2^EXA+nnP=oAOzY7s4sjBPV0;0V?%A zKs-`_IGz(yIu#8O8S1a%u~#c6@1w(mMTd{v!qzwx9Nq_phcQk)Z}-liMzxH+j@3aQ z%zD3}Bvl$NF-?-sY??(R{1PG#)+At&Blx8Eao}Bu17!=?V4G}!d+xk#RvJExCMYSI zcnX3<-T?1|zQY{W-v@r1;<7M?s!l1Y<~sZu+O-(0<}lE-E>JAwWKJ1_U!bH;@Nt`KGv8nXYRM0N`Ld>_~yE3n&EuIo#gRl{Pd&`bEt z;<9!d;do~d^@jT&IBqf7dS3xNUx_DKDxVM(H+Y~C){nZyMGTPs>Rx^yi_47 zw=sES={3Hu>mBg0e&x<7f@W8=d(Qn|S$_Ph#SCrlCf(domzNz>)yT-Th!ts|@jkLU zOd};CW4H`gFr|l`8Xp@aVnHq7XjJ3UB|T%16BK*YF5X9Zhl}zi(`^b~626~qOXnzj zIvF6omOS)*g!g?SJY=s(NyGC=8cXj(y@MQpPZPb+2=9~qJd#y?5IIe`Z<}!G&Xq0& z6V)kO%KJF)F2s4YP@a;ND<^w}>vcty=?9Kc<|NnV9>)@pv-~i zh>Ax*^o4e>#`2Nw)d*VO$Abrp2T>$HtDs*N&JyKG;68gF4ITzdKBABv5t@Vir)vfi z%3egxc?63i%tO>V?d_wI8g(YhCDd=GswUC%OQS`4rpwAdL%4V^bg`_#ubW96 zU-Rt@d~Tby`5*7~wRSX^WL_x_N9ul9AmG6-aR32ZV=h_KwD; znCsnWG2&3joG~_KUAVS()1J)xuUJJu5WR*Oz`cP9ao6Gn+Tc;TBS-w>g!qHmF!<3c5oA)f$5jz z(VjclWg|mxExTZ?&B!4xOvl|=veC3f_>GG&^bm$2YLQ}KB{Z;iyP6TjeKVj~_I3ox z>6R*P=<+^nYSlWtu^aaW@}_=TiKZ)XGA3`I;{jji3tp3J>!2!|MHz^+@~SV0e$ws* z#J)x5Mk&KnyvaPiA&o0Tz8-pc9?ta}>7!QAd&oAmVAwj=%!+^^)l5n@BIYH`+RT3(Fb=$IWe{TVX*XE3 zN}%c>61v+qR{RdWqHk*YL4I1+s~_q2*TY6DYt=;+GQ#-grwe=WL;KV5SC}_;?dlbM zp)%bv9WDQRzh^mbnr}9){pL%htt}Vy%|F6#)^0;P;Onn{@0WUwUw{4eS55JwU;OA7 zKmPi|pZxeoKl#~DKKkJ=Y+>|^KH-b7uld2va?Jbp_DA7V{tF0lgh#+s#;24*P1Loj1PkvB7qKnITn}&kA1+ zW!P^Mig}S_5Uu5M_nf)b!7);Ezok2a2#(Aekab=*EcIAJih0nA1d6s{_JIEC3wpoN zA5;dU)2_aV&Y6lvx!G1p$#L>^N`Czw>*lFB+|Zx zsrRzz^b9q}R=_LzdeZM|0IsaTTELo#D`-5@rMXHpogPIs9;U&k{E1@cELz`sPK<17=XtFoG!Ds00mj zMz)&wFD7)LY-(;L2oO`GUXiJ-SV$2rh5QKYXqRxuExYK^+y(oy7pSC_z$oQRRQ9tr z-;vBTp(Q4xk*QLX`RQdYM6qrd;+ubTE0t6%MUfT6hixgr$AA3~u@kiJ|MkBFefcDK z3X*E~>~kC`aHIk!&oeW|;jvt{-k1y={XdJ3&1Z7k`gk|)S-Ani8Uq|3#4>y9O%+kc zMl3ujSTUy(pw}ER9WMoidA@u-^zL%tu?Cr$Bku#8?D=dNiYpf zGpmSSqy1NQf_z-&>O&khBRQJPp9RX;LWeI_g$%>jI_}>Iiwdf%2%krv=oNx0-S45i zaUstBH3Y_OO>vB>GX)<<#$ibr0}dWnvOBKGbqHVU-e>lC^kr2^YkW0l)Ql{i@1=Bo zaorkVck@&wG2Jpq_7<#jI2Zzp7G?+&OcKo=VPmmWF+W9R!?=*`OadRpa$zx$UhbYP561)Uu>qmb2mMZy4{SZ&)%}Fx)o^ zNH)pro{sYY>>E;_pdi_|tir1x%9sV+pFJ^kUrB^r%`TGfXI}=r^+O+<%(#fCNv=T3 z#UOVp&!4pm^{JD=hc}3sNq0?N)0{u$I`5UdMyf=MQny&a)IIzuc6Xg-@yapQo|p9H zD}Uo`!NW(U5ZVmww*zg2%%X;ePD@_xD^$lX*=pF6Js*}SMj^9#qXWj(DB5utu5?2v ztn|KE*UcG1o-U*8<9v2rvg9;&3D#rNaGEdt9f+CQL5>ebn0yD?*fGIGaFdoF6) z67J1pjC*LCv%T~$`PNITVWDz~np|Koq-D##SSXS*I!|yM5~Q$+N`w;0AV6ueq$n?j z)+bs)rf`3*j4@;@l&hUy3*R9D92XwSY5~NVl8PSC1VT77nvoShdE?yO z{yq0O*K(?gX`@j0t2J2RsyG_BQg256oohy_xz6i_(ZcwYGl#>cuP%lp{zy*z;nn^| zHJY)(aZ|!xoxG+<*4G>qOXVSqswqD&8J9B3ILjU$<+Eul2wFz?JF-c#r`g=VMg=S6 z`k{|uUkoX4-0qh-rmN2^cq!TDoKv-G05o^f&V@3uO=5S=MNn@+i)LR-080)iB9>c{ zg-U1XHvkgr!p}ANl6D)Gv>Nvhk}L2cPh5!p$=c0R1^L#sY)9#zL$7;?vYeLw-0r!| z9OJ4cDO)F3!dV%Md~)JFB$k_DTNa=@WVeZ9yl_LWUu>_d7=2jaMNp*{q&96@I7*wU zh|jP`YqMO?LY%t_7svW2y{lL$1xXN;QfS|tV+NYmw9xeyuXlYgXv~V5D{(D-+!MNS zr)0m6_?Ygm93j>4pd?S`&@-pqFY9INf(1*;pG>jmdR!InkuYEu4{NS44kvzJJ9r7+ z^hsxTp0ssgXFA#&IO|(3(Bh_|a)=IkYaLW}lV#~Cb8b9C{3=da-@o)R9oQ#kN@r^( zJHqKbPf7RE6-vip(i&|G%Kd5?9#E$5$(5qrOxx9*{A@@OH=)zS2GcfTUo1qsxVnpVn zgu%1}lrkFaoi6dbEqk4E!*WV9l!fM_SJ-{f1wNRO$5~>R zEfQaBK0PF7=07Ueb;-+N_VOS1!6En$TsZZ~x5P_48HJ`AFtVehYiW0X-RR_8iP+NT z?ily9cfe4zLgF`<26=^Kj{ff)Ka>?BA$k^7MHU!D$k_Ar-yRaIG9?Qu8bSgo1ao0M zkn{pk%)qJzSJp1*TaR#_AFYAMja@v8T1&vgC~Un1?ce5=Lf^O3<_k;#8wiA=&Cqhd z#y^9i2CT>!(814c6DZ}oD>Zh*xN$8AQE+mKdDpJ#Y|ECl9*V?%Aqwp@&||$6jZ`@e zJ4g8+0lov_hqVRB=JC#f6Ov2Fx&Jjy(dd^eB5gkjM~|^pPgP<+c5Z%sMAD(pv_X|! z6EYB`JA+ngZXlT%yFBa*fm%t1eKlv7G#lNWxu!_cxm#RujG>ct<9x=$-&I3b3ZBS~ zK%&yF;SUcd*PTy|-lH$pOw?nT>Bo>fTLgG*|v(2ZU zehRiU1X49O``pF-*>CTkJ-Rfj$qfW`GeVkG7mR= z_N5L>foGpB!9`Ze0QL-fZIn=rDMAAgFo(1>e=q!SC?BbIrR-vdbj)E zGd50Tlk-~AzkS{Ax`mvICNcG0yH8s@*FJq?%A7$7Dz41@K~z zIP0kisoR!8S*@$+!nSL{J>)|>yN**H)VS3ip#{XHv{)O*YX$9iM5Vq@Z6O&sAjq|! z@NDL|JcII5S0In#s(-lESSaOEj8sa;Jz9|ZtzGK^3=E&b>C4)16v*w>v(AlDI^?uo zMoBG0RkSL}$u^U4gf8JqM{KMB#u~d~#8@O!ipaE}sDiLnu9||L3?;>Pu|!~4&78YK z_qOg&Kp1gOGQyPtUcEzdc+}R?!58nbBGqSw)L-0^Zb6`|<{>ksT(f&$TsHIBzdG{s zt((t2qmBE)JUA5AN$Z`2TsUpN^{zhqb?fTgcYr|u%3bn&O;362P|cn+7yfB;36G=2 zbI#8)hhp2^i!GTW*y6Ta0>g3e5&Y|Fb%>ajOOHS+=*5*XM3z5o_*2ttns&SP5wd!C zE`nrI*XevzAK*bloUUkUE;_gVj@sY^R*|%1az6B^#UVx91d@?2@8Is3Pr>d_r9~T( z$cqwJ7cl}?t9l$>!J}viF=nDIYx;DG2a#P46pBq`@XYf@VDpS6d|@ERdi3+P^KEkb zbbzK`$j+ve1O~*RD<8=dtO2rWn_(;TA4}-laIM`saWZe6>q%fydY0c?)s~=V4((-n zAPjHVOy&^`kPLJrh^A#J+lZ6kXIl;f1Hy>jVy}dVaEkl+-Z8}6-NpgS&inU6h&O<< zFbS-L{Nn_ryg&Gw9!jR;(B!S!{bu*q`Utc?bIrW)ApgjvaoW;<`~$#cyXOTr_3n7L zY0DY}Qi4iwn+$ShMz5f#ErMbJrN)vG0`O4CP|#5lz@idiw7&8eC}L8eQfN0+ZKtyA z$4q@x0VUVsY6Hlf26H1Y3m$oDt*xtl+<@84R#4&U=XoW|9b^%^`?JSWv5#I_%fcm_ zH)8tld_nO8-y&f&Qj#QeW9Is#yunk zK;^Ps3`i@tuojvc=Dcmh+av3UHhi8C?b%Sey0rCiFuFT4qGEH}w$8b!e4%Yt00U)m97Qd^&T(mF19|_tlIbOVr5p4`0 z(vq2Kdy9#+HX!4KDZ~VxQCui|wetx_+IU7KZ&3kd^p#K`1abF;VK2If+?E(Ci8U07kqEbsQ%}HQA(Hx5 zq-Pf{cA$pZdUJSclUW+|8*b>jlFK3Bit$5#CQw8QcKT-M`JK#1$_jHMS3G9AVD*hC zKtCGHJo1Rg&Epln#*u^uc*KU}e2Sl;xjR=6*Z`#63 zS+(~q8Z<9_Ehyh~f+qMB(R7J3O?g8snOfdE&|?H9*;0`yZBz_Nd0rwvbU8A*%uT&P z;?CU*3qp@jTN3<7(z}R*o}+TfEBiM`NL|Fpr+#5suCfJpJo%FB1zH##44TUULYOm` zDhFAiU(Pa52MmnQT}tPi3Ri!T6{_a3`Tso%Cjlwp8kM&cHHP&QN;VPATg{+cKB0 z;TA|Th#SaM477i)g2hsY?Mj35D><5`W*3nI32&~rGAqA@WKL^wbzX$9(g(^d2*4!P z3AjjhH)T)ayM{w9J*mx`oyj_qgqqdf75TLl>Kmv=Z{}(_sWDlNZVO@>)4e zR$+&x^hew%izF75z=It^0Px7hIu%UznV&oJzF3BLtCF_EhLM3^l*fH>DiKOyAfe7K zbVga5^85uqDSWxPRwMKMlHEzzX1b9EOSX1X{->Ove_l>dcf7m)v|!-Mx#I}E>2RL8|T}F?Ts~m1e0on zd4HJ+j`Pl=Dup1w!<-7o6hR-hQ08n$mt%9m*1A1ig6C(db3JW^f*Y-5nQM-rMe#bx zs(EVjNJEL&$*@>fT+w#oNPt4%=Zt!rY8ItBZ}Bue$hP3ONC5<$f@$s$TI9;0rfK*- zELX0WhjkqSa0_jbQgAe02TNQb5ZFYmd87j9RGap^KaZ!UkIX$s>EQRONNQo=shV|~h9D#o6#`zYEDJh#zHw#!Qp@$OKf^T0(EB)5H zn8=@t!%49iN}sgHRbXl^@7Tl_i+<`@c~TT(S*pM#l}d1#m*a6eWt&wi%3cqE|iY`@fG2xUHvcQ9JHbRFU zE+ZTF@E;(?FbUELKddY8=K@=ItPzDTTb9p!D28m?@>!71$vuA=RLic`wvMVTbmQ#a zwcQ!B1H!ytPTZrA2hLM}ShUThxV+>=)XZJ0}@~73Q^~2)VLi zkmTr!+*&o10>0r=MoR&lYBgepwAT}+of}_Ylr83+t&>>{Z7bc)e8e2twUWPlCB0_` zz4-5gOS&Pd@ncDfsd9ovI9C(?EM?`F=EYID_O`9LNZE{Q5KLe4jGOz+?u5iy5CR!% z5N~r3Bk?d@vG!Rsd<^R2Ga+VSIn_~R{FXgAu2d@a!nYb#>byllz`jUu1RS{2Z;3Qv z6xm(U&fP0?iX0;ZnM~1$;t9ehE;T0a2(k+0Rn36?jGcm} zVtamr>9O$(6o*AMF~n@mN+)%+q?wz^6PbND`*TyO8zFvWk|!GmKd9stiR(<^Q&+}> zQ51x5QTCEgNJ*0#;_(DVUV^TAX)zPkwF)BRU6mZm*; zqlg2gr6?+Fx4uGC1>lH(WQf6Be+1cCOCGM=dPtcuWSOjj8!RM`rQuuR?w@4d%ACq@ z67vXgn_FcY&rIk0xzjE>Ljh3Y7Nvz7QUc6E$CK1ah1fMzl(GdBC#H+|tt)t5?1npHj1i%*0~$ar;d( zA0>i0Q1UJL~`+xjzy`#K5lf%^Ez)68xBQ-uXVnbyxc5^OG_dfS2j*SC6p;z|= z4jN3aUAs~ZJP+t{tJuKgDM?9-dfhl!YO~iB}n@`q4 z@mmCAOEvOBPy7+hWY%yr2#S=_@vxaGMeLE`SuSs&J~ zF8}0?z+QU&D3*zs(cXB38X2sA-LT4b?jni7A2Qj$ZrH;9Sz&uwJ~MQ@1TKL9)1s?R zgN$xmHVY!7S7#nQPOa`{*#PMJqGZ;O<8?$>=vw5Q-mQImF@F z++IdL1q3VCfkVBaJJD!L5?OT!quJ8&!_QTJeWJsdNUXU?jT3;wm~$Bd&zcs5n5i;b zmua5+b`j-W__~xpz?~1-DoFx2&3Uh5&~H)fo-64`PChl52ch}$3{xn5)#=uc8Fn0h zt4o8ta}eI?*l&r#Ut6-cYW#?%YCr-ZcxTGbY56jg6vukFN|zpaRe46QBMYS#!T0g{ zL@Jl1dOjUd2#v+Rb3WSyiA({sdmWtGVOjDxT0|{zP^!K#w#Ey+bVV|rpww;OJL-G8 z+c;pH`0%k5&Edhsj}_%bAg-^4EW24QTj3J#M!m*#+L)E4qS<7fI+oLaOTg>kL z(f@yc{vXGUnGeR*$Pji|3+*=;815x(TMcD}Kdn`fZe}LlalVI-=*)ZU{P-4b?6~#AM z<&7>!jG6Buj)x2x7^lND4DUisY3@^8M2oXkx~)$ZjZwsvoerZ0e)xMwPwzYTjk|Pt zj^+nOco#6q%syR}tf@@K_~>`LaOLLm|N0-YQA$1Y?e06-KRg4g^LE_DH|sx-n8YCA zKAzf(1oN{X&RQ-a>BQC9%oD66Tcy3bcVPiM6q@ofYJ!&1R&prQp$Yr z2Ng2D3jYIP9>71IQ@9f>DdI9rjEFBw2TVg%Jiy>{^7i8ju9G24bgOTP(^GvpIED-r?jpuleR0ge>5E11L z79yRIRJ^Jq&Dsau;Ze70%-be0-QA^;yvArR%Q~s>ONK{Ik;@Di(9s#*NEx+XL11o3 ze(6;^CcqON0${#*;VG=C5VvS=g8aj}SyK6cV>vOtOd$5gVL<96=EoEt$%3 z-&W^0CS)=3^ke>pO(t`mkbzJs0~Dc4nIipmXiBAdAyMul4m+S;KvD@ibO)@k2!J> zdn|f(9D_SNVo4cSEfXbi>!}n)LZ`-R0Z_s!5=|z*m_HX@h9NZ_ZyiwNKXsXmg9^$nP5PaeqPZ%a)#E5u0|LO zFAUX}Icm?Y9PvsOwZq?H?~8TaoC!=nXNjn1Gag++C&MXAjOj#_ew3eJ1CAjcLH&qQ z6YVXf;g*4&qG{SiSx3zOvcg2*}`jQiD@#cZc)6 zcHsO;qa_q}y10mR26lg|Bavs5$ZoR7L@_yX6xjMs9B$V7ALcyKC=I$oiRMDKK9TlL zn|4JT8y5qsKD0XOnq~m6hzJfej0lIdp;MEMiUx7GZ#xChio$a<^c18A?OzTBU8vA4 zf|ym((V??F;_ZtQyP3ssHk7=I17Zh$Z^kE5J+wv@uoO6^kwF(w5u=XFf(Y za4dDOVZak2jmx@N(@oo1rgfBgZt}xS;&)5J2s7VT%Xl7)A{UNs(y5xja%fXQ zR~#tg)#Hp(w`s4WqGp)cI-{@&AeIllxDk)Hl9lT1z^ z5}ZT!%+e$Q(a}9SMH=5^ddeHO!c5kASu@ebNaHH2*%dh&7J$eV&`DQTeGG>Gmnc6) z$8;LaXRRj$<|%Q6AaV;mAD-!Qk~tyO>RmsG{kOx)l@PS~4j$0lk{IJ(YAHFsC@NPn zF&MV>lEQU*>Xt+Zvsa+LVNxya-BN_V5!9Zgt{qREFpBf&2EcvevI$`eit*!RYejSX z_ys0LX7~R12Oe?z!*s?i%(Y=9f9qX6d+aZOkVMG?1Mj=<8dOjJnTf(n(6c;>1VcD# zTVN>rUg8!#gVO$E^&SC>OOPXcgVmUA2!^UrpUqDNaq#ZDp_5OK=Mh4PtqgGH31mz( zKOQ)wLK_u#M;Rm=_Rpp)xB#W);h3nxD68BffLJ=)GEt<*zjJT#;QBcmIc|SaLlDsaw z&=g_73_yhKwrTrpE1#~k)fS@U&=Iowy0LAA9yq3DhmPw(ASmu`O)CB`=)2*FEvB8+ zq8&uLE|&09YS+Sd?@kfF;G;m#c?-hLA$Q%mE823~4{dV>dFimjM2(WK>YDmAwhAnQCx8kSyx|XYXyABss2Y!M~EG&FePHZV~`NicNbkgBlB5TcrueVTIiW}EWID1_e;jlx%awz zL}pbtsw=&!8npqs@-x!I{eGT%4tl{-$zsyj_fo~~mfo%KUq@fb)gWk)Tw_;kRoB_; zn(C@4U@e4Sm?`( zrB@%A;}8(JUTQJL890!#sXgBYA0Is9aB?ExwoLW{2`GH=o;0TPyaF&%MTSb$X@uHF zWNyauXa{tLywMf9U^@x7Q{za^zd~3!2pEft#t)Kd-Jb$X_~j`_&TpeQuUOlp>vjY`uxje*WW0(_Dhxi(&X1G2 zKoVRe(v{;L@1Y|g9G+lBZ$xvtOW24I4?4CC$l5BXJrOTa|S60!b^s5=w}Z7*?dR>OU4TY>u;Pf zQ_U>aC!K^cSdw@OWEe%@k@`hJ<9zaOO=QqwQx?#U${H@KEQxf0dwH zt%JdM<5g<%Z+S|F#s2TuZcLWUE)mL7x7T%yy+t`Avk>E z2uv{@&qS`#T!-A|YW3`OlDRuW-(erf=?>@4VibEp?wT-^mwa}S6XChX39hsTg_Bl` z&RnIsF%oc$h|Hy3&6|HE)#nX$o{CMAk-C({jdq*JH+aL!eVucAK!B~4vWryajH)bY z4(5tvyJqm7Y$!r@2evjH@!RU)v5KGh1i2pwCso~@&UiH}BbFx^`iFaVXE9$aS6)MFq zAEp$2e%f+A(#<{^e8?riPM0ul8UyDS1aAtCc|&mo6!u6nXkaT^Fu|;Y65cz_jdfeg zGtOGll(kMr6-3r5)$vUf61e$TL*!t$N+q25{ipS$fb9X5w2IfJ^ny}dZhb^356i_S zky9;I=kbrBrvQ#U@X1HoU)H$YrmVDy92n6hqr~qt;(6(GnQ&lBmUx<%+(dRFyBg|l zW-jl2~3lTr7UYe-UsW`&qtG%-yPmfiT^#YYfuYZ*2rvjMSpw}gr26n7sP zSu*n_YQ@>FoT_ECMbDJgs9}O6Vj-~OmBC$5AwjtA&8kFe_r%nFnm{Ny3t%oRw~tCf zHfqC!s*(izPaioEe_LGTcf`k;I60)CYG?a2hj6gnftoXUU5oP|hG*tDsQhUVz5A#CXQ~dX9 z(lotrqeMFlVdLwF4;^*r5aZ(0<9%jTdc5NM1Kz~RVq48lOZaqj1yL`#nmz0aSKU0> z1uJvOCtSJTr5mBGSm)zI+Ds1xLIVD zUln#vkkt~JBMMg721L%S1hq316)JuSC6PeK<>lTojnM2d69FX7=R>_QptRVh5wTv@ z8iBM*&q0IhLMxnh3e64$4#{`~uTJb}_@=pN#PN#LIl3{$*sfR_?Lv}tu9{(aU$V`^ zd`_?8gajLTO~Wvg0W=nuVi|YS;GW9An^t(G^iRyFt*Jp&2&WGuK-!=H@^tpwTE